Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1955
Microfilmed by ® North Carolina Department of Archives and History , Division of Archives and Manusrripts Kaleigh, North Carolina oo ~ i a P ‘ | ‘ F -_ 2 ‘ > 21013) RED wath le 4 0 or YEARS — 195 a J Ale ciadak Wi Hiase George-/a4 Allison. Miner va¥s40 Me Evere tt Fae ford-22/) 23) Ataica here aks dn-219, 308, 48,507 Ab ison, bhilliand &. ~ 225,599 Are Kay Elee trie Corp. -a7l Anderson, thomas H.- 351 Adam s Mae S- 342 ee Adams, T.C.- 353 MFE~ 390- Alexender, Samuel Yates- 440, 403 & Albea, Ralph Shelton #06 . Alley, hobert Q.-4327 ek, Bk cows Al Sard, Claude W -s0y cadens Jacl -4587 Albee, Cesar Leanatlt, Lut Wha, Pegi ciaen Allen Betty S-y9y i s Aut Farts iF fe -36 4 $65,523 . pt oe Parsee sud man peaiianenwate-twih pdemeiorin aren nist om 3 ¥ m f = b e + aiid ee Beaver, VW. F. 7 Brown, Lewis - 4s Bein CE. 2g Barkley, Nabert-sig Brewn, Ann ake, a Brewer, dames Faul-¥60 Bradshaw, Willian, Henry - 33,39,44 Bea, Chffard Woodrow -¥6¥ Beaver, Herndon Albert-ss Praner, Kama C-¥ 74994 597 Brown, Robert Shaw - 39,219 Brody, Marry - 492 Borders, Jamas, Sr.- 39, 2/4 Dis hanes, Cary Co -48% Ba ss, Martha Mayne re hed Lish op. Kenneth MN-st%, 50% Brunner. Franh- 6¥ Bailey, N en Pad) - 54s Blac k, Kober FC. + 72, 79, 94,9 6,97 Leaver, eberk hee-s06 Brawley, bel Loi K-11, 1/2 Bradshe wv, Charles 8 -4u Braw ley Seed 64. -M.Hr Peard Lew:'s A-83>,iWy Bellamy, Lucinda- (ay Ba tler, De /ares- 589,515 Bargess, Fred k.- 129 Brown, Gene A-569, $14, 41y Barker, Dwight I -/3.7, 139,435 Benfield, Frank- 71 Bailey, Alanna - 14h, 449 Bryan Ldahn E/ave S16, $12 ' a Bian, Cly de -/47 Beaver, de wry Allen-S50 : Brown, Din es bec -A07%, 244, 369,402, FOI Bre Wey, Genkry lee “IEG Bustle, Gilbert Eugene ~o2/0,2/9 Brewer, Dewey S -s4e v Brock s, Wayne Hay weed -/) 228 Br stn, Margareh SF ~S5Y, 599 | Beber, Crady-21%, 225 Meaver, Nalen C- $54,599 4% Bra dy, OF. - ass Beaver, Clif Sard Wordv qui #69 Burgess, Lerma Wi'se -239 Benge, L£dna fox -379 Bar tield, Robert Pdbutar dn tue Brown, fae Emmua Hartge |)s09 Biggs, Mattie Lee 256,264, 2453 Bane) Fewsral Hinee- 2% ee. Last Banal, Furnikure Ca - 2 79 ¢A33 Bing ley, CO Bryant - sar, 40a, wo Bras well, Lewi's deantene -364,27, tom sad Baile y) David - 349,500 Brees eale, Char/es-309 3/0 Br run, Wiel hn es Fienaiie nae } look we /de Getty Custer-sa4 Dy num, dulia S.- 325 Bem's Bris, Ba 4 ln Bd Ben fre /y Harry hee~ #79 Black, Wellie dames - ¥é1, 4 Bang ue 36, dames Lleo-401, ¥as By ers, Ed May ~ #0), 414 fas z, ik “406 ' : ae od cn tM re neers <5 sa coe Pi, latte Sashet Ce. Il Charles, EG. - 432 Csllier, B. A.M 202 Carolina Dohor Co.- 43) Craig, Mary D. Ash 26 Camp be//, Konaie-¥5/ Coffer, Walt-31 Comp hel} Brenda - 452. Camphe || James es 33,166,208, 303,304,399 Carson, Nenvy-481 Cummings, Mein Wi, Niam Alits Ter Cleary, dN. -463 Cummings 23, 34,46, 418,202 Cook, Marie 0. - 4a gpses Lampbe ll, George Will am-32,221,344,900 Calandrielh, Daniel J= 492. Click, Willie- 54.30é Childers, Glenn F-30101 Cline, Rasse/l S. ~ 54, YSIS Cork Marry hee -$02.,5/6 Cranford, E y/o Madrid lass-87 Conelias, Willie A - $09,519 Corr 'be, Emery C- Jb Clarke, Budojoh- 337,09 add, Fred H. -uv Crouch, Ned fay - 5/9 Fuld, Batt « Jnan-iif Camp be/), Gracie -53/,622 burle e, Shirley Mae barsen-/32 Crebh hots Slutzs -s2¢ Campbell, Jiha- J46, 469, 5/4 Campbell, d. oh - 425 Coxne/,'us, Sarah, I -/40 Come drake Mat ceva Cotte beeper, TB. Mokor Lo.-lite Chom bers, harry Lewis -s¥? Rieti ne Shins Equipment Co -199 Chambers, Donald Avery -Syg Chek, John T- 200, 399 Cook, Frank J - 549,560,558) c arr, James- 207, 364, 406,540 Cass, JS) + Shertie~ 504 Clark, Dard Janathen-304 2/2, 5$4.2,, 902 Cosh, Viekse Care/-too Combs, Gu -22/0,.2/9 Charles. Ws Litas macy aa dee as Ch eek, Curry None) -2/4 224500 Cong e.¥; Ben -2L/4¢ Cashion, Homer 8B. - 219,309, 407 Conan, William I =44 ca be § fre. bikie: Mae: 25 5,272,371 Camp bel) Elizabe45C ae re felainaicese| Ci pnidih iinae' sh Cask, Albert Lee- 30 Coven, Piiaiee Lersy - 302,.3/4, 442,500 Chillers Ketmct ve - 30%, 309 Ys Canphe th Eli -s3ig Campbell, Ethe/ Cashitn- 322 bod ec, Sylvia Fern @ - 344 Cline, Ruby - 334 ( aldwell J. *¥ CO BNF Mary Lucille 344 Chine, Betty W.- $91, ¥oe di @ fh bers, W.C% 944,448 | Batmnton Calvin Co AP, B8h a ee ee eer eee ne a a a aan pees Dison, Willard L.-#1,30e,303,399 Dishman, Aawrence £.- #6 Daney, Mary Ki - 74,1380 Davis, (H.,Jr -/44,397, 463 Dielx soh, Pui V. K. | 40, 962,253,360 Davis, Wilke H. ~ OF, 215,354, 308 5/6 Fase, dake Melvin, Jr-215,38 Davis, James \/ -2.36 Dillard Wilford Eugene - 3M Damats, Veronica Anita - $36 Dar's, RW. - BS4, 395,554 Danis Supply Co. - 394, 395, 559 Dawkins, Thelma -327 Varkon, Gloria- 3% Dune an, Are hie - 401 , ell Davis, James Reyle . vealeas Dolton, L. 0 ~463, 446 Davis, AZE Lea 40 Davis, Katherine -4a3 DeVin ey, Virginia Marley - 446, #49 464, 5323 Os, Pp MNeer- 416, 477 Davis Fred, Davis B;|Co-491 Prye, Gurley Ralph-so3 David so, Frank -~313, 516 Vearman, Vanee Lee-s/d aes g: Laseilg: Ml eur Day ¢ dames & -s5y Dancy, S+, Chean £.-5é/ Ditre ki berky Fant foods, Tne- 542, : sent iu omer i we seamen a Kear ; fuser ees anse sei otter P bce. | ae = enillccne Statin las deniainceie eames PAD een iceeeennctien fh pg eo ee EID. MN ec 6 RE ENE ae Fagle, Maude J =? Eagle, PA - 48 Employment Securiky Osetia tense n «300 Eagle, Mrs. 1.C. - 36! Ellev, Tohn J -16, 564319 Wd Bechara Jaanrttt leaned ent tt ait ~ : i SaaS ai ASO SO 1) t T iit i i it a \ * i a i a 4 i Pa cf : q i 3 : 3 ; Mi rl a t * Foy, Ray mand Kalyh / Friend ly Loan, Servi lesa£ne. AZ Franklin Savings Bank® Fesperman, ray — 3/, 246,$ 43,397, 491 Fleming, Genes Bruce Alias GeneBS, 32, Ye F ake. Henry Kuss me Te SS, 18 Freeze, Ralph -3? Franklin Savings Bank-/02 Freeze, Benne 2 Fay ~(F6, ALF, AS6 Fairview & racer ry Fleming, Willian Taf #- 209, .2/9, LH Fox, Prul-218, 225 on ous zeke Sedu be bne- 29s Fy é, Sarak Lesna eae Frady, Mary Eunice - 240 Fox, Ernest- 354, 355 356 Fesperma Ay..% lay d.-401, 4n Fist Nob; sna! Kank sf Mosresvi lle- 4&¥ inineell S ae al ~aal ee a Feng Gud ley Bros. Linplement Ca. OE Gra von © pd. ~ 31,746,363, 399, 506 Credmen, Lake White 34, 4/ Gilbert Engineering Co. Ine. - 67 ay, Nettie Sharpe -7/ | Greenville County Fair, Lne-77 ‘ (rose, Wim Frad Caldwell-/0%, ib b-lag.coe Ht Distributing Co. Lnc try 6 itis Poul ne de Jot), 420,476, 543 a Gilleland, Glenn 125 cout Alvie Lee - 246,303,399 beesby, With am Alves, William Taf t Fleming - 261.219 Goss, Wilke pee-209 223 Ghspy, Wi lh'am Plly-20%,206 rrecne Edscanad Jamiae~ ain bibson Herbert Alexander 221,200 Grand Jovy “Report 43 -243,3/4, MY 19% bedbrey, Jesse Kranklin-308, 366 Gregory, Foy CWHN) - sos, 317, set bri FF hp, Wilbert Hezehial - 305 Cible, daniin last enn 365,309 blaspy, Mohn- 309, 12,50 2 Granth, dune - 344, #01, HID. 6 illeapie, Frank Foose ve/t-3)7 Gray Tohn W. - 34/ | 5 brady, Carol Mae B.-390 . brant, Charles §-¥o9, 502 a Gillespie, Frank Kooseve/t-we Glasgow, eos Carrigan -#/4 Clemn,d.K, d Hidrietal-4¢ Greer, ukh dws Je. YY YYS Genera] Mat ors He ceptance, Comp -¥6/ Gabrie/ Noney 2 -v97 Guither, AM 449 Gaither, Cle menk Fowl dr.-5da, $42 Gress, Eete/- 549, sn Goodseh Compamy, BF +763 hme an RNa Rela: Ae Pps Haves san. Cameron (Cam) Hayes 51, 343 Nauston, og dean -45 Houston, Cay fe -t,45,a04,s00300,0,8)Nay es Euls lyers - Kee Harris, George -~ 32, A260, 364,377 ,42 Wy] Ear /- Bef, $46 Hill, Lstah-3h, 44,269 Name Lng. Co sth -48) Henderson, Vode Jean-3.3,207, 304,400,500 YS fell Anne MNNeely -4g7 54, $05, 5H Han t er, Laura Mae ~ SH, 21D, 2 92,392, 402 he cs, Cameron Marri son-499 Harwell, James Groce - 34, ¥4 Now g. Fred, Te -S if Homlen, heroy, In-.37, 74 N04 e, Ytn phLdsaine. de- dh? oust dn, Piece OP ati, oi Sib, 409-549 Nal}, Cly da Bia kacda dt? Hansen, Jach H.-¥6 Helton, James Nalter-s/2 Hinson, Weaverfi-s3 Nason, Meher dhl a24 Hall Samuel G.-1/3 Hamparies, Fr ed- $Aa0 Hielory Poultry Moret feed Co. ~h2? Hoover, Joan Uilheln- 559 Harris, Kosa Lack ay alt Ha er, W. Lewis-579 Huds on, Minnie Baie — 140,449 dover, Vil liaom Thomas -594, $8 Hl Wille -~/46, £47 Hayes, Ale /N- 59? Hill, George -/40 Hone yeutt, Aken Eugene. -517 Henderson, OR. -/40,599 Hedrie kk, John-I52 Mayes, Gonnie Mae Chari by nist 42 Hl end Eug ene - 207, 40d, 506 Hud-san, Thomas, {r.- 201%, 215 Halland, Geer ye Dwi ght “22/0, AV yh! Henle cen theme eae Howard, William To -25/ Hieke ¥, Art ell- 2¢ 3,597 tough Wylie Co. - 296, ves Hosni fini -~ 305,506 Noward, Namie elle. 323 Harding, Margaret Alex ander- $3! Ham Orig) t, David Frank -333 Herding, Betty Sue - 34¢ Harris, C lay — 387,363 Hendren, Mrs. Mae -359, 39%, Hal Hute hens, Dillard You ng -S64 Hemmings dames Cray. 373 Harris, Jack K-23 eb Hel, Labia: SIb, 419 Nam, Jesse hee -¥ay, #11 Nay n es, Paul Read- ¥st, Sot i e, Peng y Jaanite - 11 Ntbman Walter Fene- tas, 4 Teenhour, Atwell U ly sses-%33,207, 3040s Tredell, Counky of -/a% Lingle, Lersy - 303, 310 sae, Glenn Sm FA - 309, ¥OS, YI, SS¥ Lnpram, Jack Nerri//- 401, 412. Et bend Siinal Shoe Co- 4a 9,497 Eset hour, Floyd-#16,8a3 LZ hard, [ary Cather ne-$04,505 i : eee seidnic ab it | i t i | i | at nr er? mene rere renarreeraenrinnae “nen nn asin Ce iaaihliailaenaisatenmeianci cana anensNet annem Jus dake Dewey, Jr.- 25,40 Johnsen, Me Brown -122 Jobosen, Maynard L. -)4b, 263,253, 14 JB Croper Mot» bo. - 186 Jardex, Tsabelle A- 200 Jian Eugene ~ 209,224,260 $ 0°, SSF Dib on, Henn an dim CS -02/I, 196,516, Yr Jebueam, Wilieue G.-134 Lally, Buth L/. “247, 352 daknser, bleed Fo: an Johnson, Foster-302, 4, ¥ae dehnsen,dames Wayne - 34s Tehesse. Homer Linwesd- 342, 3il dae k, Melvin Levey -36 Y, 309, #43 5d dohasen, Elizabeth T.- 204 Jordon, Thelma-391 dohnson, Arle -48¥ d ones, dah Nenry ~Si7 duis Litas EX sige bn cass thnson, SLeven dy. Alias -S4), $62 Luvis, Laub - 542, $04, $45 Ws tihon, Peat Se Pi otnes, Dla Eds th Moore -s9 Eat dian aries ae itanectncael ecaniaananammemenmataanal Hee ENTS ae feat Knox, Gharles Hemry ~32.201,364,39 yee o Kennerly, J. C. - 32,303,499, £46 Knox, Mildred C- $4219 Kebrick, Kn.M -ke King, Sam~207, 4006/0 : Air b ; Lohn Calvi'n-214,2.11 / nox, Kobert J.-24/ Ht tH Const rue Sina Le dt L Hennerly, Samue] Fdgar-252,347 Kecter WH-22738 : EP Hendal) dil Co. - 365 Kimbrells of SLatesville, Line -$44 "Tha seep nad win gsi ach ana ht ep deni nted' dav,Jl hang, Sam K ney. heckey, LL. Csi) ~ 31,343,499 Lewis, Jehn W.- 32,268, 3lb,40 Lambert, Tames Ralyh-35,2/9 Laws, Cran fer d An drvew-3é Lane, Bri'seo- 4.2 Little, S.A Wn.the Ayerly Walhker-)49 hynch, Thomas hee 226,317,402, Hy 519 Lowery, A Fs ta S99 lewis,Lvah Mis bet -253 347.454 557 Little, Richard Davidssn- FOL, $12,501 La Vi'gne, Lem's JijJr. -369, 369 he Vigne, Fvasees. 23. Camannn 22! howe Motor Co.- 34 Lewis, Emma- 344 Lewis, E.C. - 344 Aytle, Bemaer-354 Leftwich Hessie Hdes'e \y- 37) howe, William Chavle s, abe 594 YMly S£Y5F7 Lowe, Emory Lagan, Admr—311, 44,644,587 $77 haw Z er, Charles Boscee., Fdn- 291,449 45% ! 4 $27 itt doles dpaephrinn «22240, ep amberk, George, dr. ~40), $03,554 Lambert é e/een & ~ 463, 407 Law reace, eimai Wes lay ~ 446 Little jshn, Anniz. the (-4S¥ hacke q Bron, E. dre 457 Ai ttle, Avis Grown -459 Little Zia Pianist Hog Leiroye Ainenee ge 479 led ford d thn Floyd- $41 Ayhton, le stey-sa2, S46 Lamberts Nennie Jee SI 7b, dyt he, Alphrnse-£ 54,590 Litt]. Bruce-554 476 Laws, Wilhiao Wayne Shed Laren oy, Danie |-s96 ge Mawbray, William Mitch olson- 33,208, 364, yoo MNLlelland, Robert Shes Tune Banks- 35,208, 344 Maynor, dames - 34,4), 45 Maynor, Wil Liam Ear! - 34. 90, of Movéen, Terry- 31, 7d Mitchell, 2. Vv Fach -~ 34 215 Matheson, Edgar 8. -# Messick, Bristol A. bur More, VW -68, 62 Meadevs, HE. -72 Martin, Georg e Uinkneyy -LAS ithe s Fh ial F nwutinninn Messiah an of Liipais-17 Read sui H. E —i/9 Murray Bisewt fo. -)23 Morrison, hile K. -128 Morris, M. i ~/34 Meadaws, H. E. “J24 )37 Miller, EF -l#to Mller, J. S.-spo Moore, Harold G -208 Myers, John Hebert - 204, 214 Mews Sabin i 204, .2/0,.2)1,.9/6 Mot on, Tabnny L awis-125,306 Mar an, George B.-230 Neekin, Hgze/ We -2387 Mapai cas Fh. - 242 . Martin, Rukh Shoemahe r-243 Men's on, isn Aew's b/i/son.t52 Mize, Mr. Mrs. Geor ye A- 226 Mosser. Warren VAMosser Flying Myers, lee Pract On — 364, 464,505, 410,518, art Serwite -. Moore. Willian Taladge oP Om, 44M, S08 t M Cssic k, p , Pap hee- sey, 309 4 Mill er, dachie- 310 Mey ied Gewge Ldth-311, sa Nilst ead, Oave- 228,40)... t i Nayes, Beatrine Pesle - 397, 4u0, 5.409 Meadows, Bruce C. -4 1, 442 ih sovesville 0,'/ Ca “ALT Honey, George ~S4aS [oore, Liman -56% aves san, Cas lyin, dr. ~$O9, 5/3, 3/5 Morrison Calvin, Sr ~ $39, 5)3, $18 Mp ran, Leanavd person aS // Willer Men nak Larvel! ~SI0 oore $i /d, Aiber tM -s54¢ I8G semenr pension. Mowresvi'/le Producks Co 74S sO M* Mullen, Cro VOr- $5,%2 MA, ley, VAISS 4) Elwee, WoH.+ wife, Dugles P-203 Crary, lam my hee -2)8 AAY M Chee, Margaret - 337 M Daniels, Darre|{-47b,IAb,$21,404 MNeely, Ethe | F.-497 IN Bu£h, Shirley 507, $5 te bes bs, dikes Fran n-S/2% MZe [lan d, Robert Alias Vane Banks, sy 900 Mash, h.G.-140, 48 eshit, Li hynn-/48 N. C State High way ¢Pablic blarkelmm. yy ‘eho ls is Fiiexel Fi siithe Lane. -/S3 Nelson, NoraCall-24¢ Nixon, T.L. - 362. uso Nagel Clydene E,- 396, 420,58) Nes bit, Narry Lee - 403, 403 Reino W. MM. 44 Nage) Lawrence. £-s9! Mee emniumensiume i Dstwelt, SamH etal - 104,229,253, 346 bst ma lf, Thelma- LUD Aas, ars Drren, VB -135 ¢ brren, Haze] P “/35 : Desai: William Leonard- 315 Dsbwalt, Ruby -$46 Overeash, Clyde Kenneth - 461, 12. a: : Contin, Nirman hi SO0S on s, Abi L.-st = ni ot RS oat Pa Syn aloe amd ohswipmcid pba amination ‘ " : it Ao +. al af | Fs sail ach he . settee ei on ee u ad Ac od J i Pd y and oa ’ ; ie oe ie Pharr. Howard Clayeland -s4¢,57 Prker, Mav-3% 74,469 PS. West Loustruckian Ca.dno-b4253,41! Varker, Grace - 4b, 274,427 Prerce, 2. O.- 72,140,265 _ Mary Mla vandere ti, its,ted | Marve Ski man - 72, #0, $I$,599 ; ae Georg e- 7d cue os feoples Lua wii Savings Bank 20), (Pato, hve le Clarence L. -/46, 497 Planmer, Willa Lee - 20%,2/4,234 Props Lt Harvey ~ 2/0, 2/4, Ade PieKelsimer, fs lyde WAN Tr- tll, abd Varker, elen Ferr y 247 fiercy, fay 4 352,415.20. She Phill (ps, Aisnns eli Bl Patterson, Virgs | - 309, 316,313 Farken, al Judy - 342 Parker, Walker- 342, 343 Acker, David - 343 Payne, t ‘harles H- layne, LF. Seo Phiser, Nellie 6-932 Peacock, Elle Wilsan-371 thie Marshall Douglass - 39/ Pape, Leroy - 397, +76 Varkey, Jesse Willard, Ar - 401,413,519 Wasteon David 0. - 46s Gowers William Neward-467 barker, Mrs. Mildred 2. - #69413 Cel Lum ber vty Co, LIne ~¥77, 96 Privetbe, Granvi le. Lee 4! Plyler, Paul Revere - 44, $F Vichens, Nerberé -304 VAiler Wilken kas atts Ryd. Discount Co. -402, 409,469 26,2 Rad. Discmunt Co. -522,504 Jo vx 7 Kiscoun£, Cb. 118, 4e.p/ bo, 440 C4. kKhicount C.,20, 1489 774 Raby. Jud. SP 2510 22s Redfern, Jack Kichard -3342, + Rarvie, Curtis - 3344 Recker, Hars ld Frank hin-#9 a Reid, Fiead - j fischinghem Agricultral Exposi#itn, ve z 4 uot, August, Tr -/10, 361 | Bee hut Mar y Pearl-0,Ul,3” Kam Sey, Ethel L. Smitth-/ 40,269 Re/d, PM. -20! Aeevit, Hal Monroe ~245 ; } Riesel Wi'Teaun Frede rick-2)9 223 q Rieharda 6n, lade. ef ani or-225,.245 Hi Ramsey, Thomas -3o4 Nebrrd sta A. RB. - 365, 3le, 4/0, 426 Rappe, ea Til gh mas, Tr - 364, 409,509 [Saliiion Bbc ak Kai. ond, Junius — 359, 391, $42. Riis Wilford Kay- 372 , Riebis cue Benjamin- 37! Aibede Dallas A- 397 Bian Nare ld d.~4¥463, 6am Msberts hie Mas A. 44} Kibdee Coal Pres Zon-S4l Heep Narry hee - 542 Robine tke, dana kh wv “Has. Ka 2er, Charlie Ss duns ar- Shs Reey, Mare En ene -S/2 K fg yal Willie-sao Reid! Charles, dr -$99 ae SS a ci 354 $2,553 Hatesville, Coty of 18% AT 118.290 4/? eathers, Kay hee -LS4 Sudder ¥h, NE et al-41¢ zr Stamps, Herbert VW -as¢ Sherrill, ME Sr... , sath Me J. £. - 264 Statesville Industrial Bank, 36%, 374, 225 Fakes ri//e /Th9. Co. 285 4.90, 469 Samples Mir ters L mp le ment 60.451, al, WS oa Lhermipinale ¥ x), er Co.-24b Spann, Ka mond Saunders -3/, 266,353,392 Stren e, Ames -302, FIA, $O4, 07, A 508 519 Shi'nault, Bial Rag ies Mh, Bend Bliss Bill ShinaulF - 3.3, 34,48, 819 122 Sine, loke It - 349, 406, A Scott, Edward Kichard- 33,44, 4521%,221 Scot Z, E. tn! iy) ¥ Onl ly) -5// Surles. Levi ' Parsan-33,a/3 Cott, Fannie- 3/7, 41d Stat on, 9.8. - 34,37, ¥b,21/,35 Speaks, Vivian Vass-3!7 Stevenson, Voce Lewis-2 456,37 Ttivn MF. - 320 Smith, Roheek - 34, 36,25¢ Sloop, Ray Franh- 335 Shine, Nat han- 354 St; He leather, Yeva- 3736 Scott, V.C - 3%, 213,243 Smith, Mary D ye - 347 Sims, Sam Eugene-3%, 225,315 Pitan OC. - 359, S94, 5%o Sigmon, Luther Frad~ 3%,2/), als Shufsrd, Limmie - 359,Wae,yse Spealts, Stroy Dug ht om -56,54 Sivn Last nv Lee-325%, 591, 465, 444 Snaei. Kay Frantes -b5 SLakesrille. Fleur Mille Co hey 396, 425,486, 444, Saunders, Vittens base; 72-2 OS ~SLurinpia vr, Mis. Here |- 306 Seruggs, George D.- 72,133 Stallings, BK - 392 SeetF, Mheyd- Van 469 Sisk, Joels herey-393 Steadman, A 2 -725109 Sloop, N.W.- 384, 3275 Syhes, CA. - 72/09 Shell 2R.- 399,432 Sloan, lary S 5, -743, LOB Abs SA erri/) Gilmer-349 Stalling s, Mar - Crom-77 Si'my son, Thomas -yoo, 0% sata Hen, ry J-/27 Sipes, James -460, ¥6F 5/3 Seat#, Ballet her Sr — 446,359 Shepherd, Namer,dr ~ AOL HA, Shuma ep, Clidis tt oo 257,253 Seah/er, Navold Eugene -463 500 S Fates rile Mstar Staak oa ~/44, 259 Sharp e, Clyde Ka he 4 ~PoO? Steward, Have ld S440, 468 Shee maher, Eshket 0. -Vbb, vor Stewaré, Hen, y J. -/40, 404 Southers, Cova-#0l,543 } Simi th, Th n - 140,409.56 PhumakeMary dane Barnes- 430, 469 Sims, A. J “Ib Seville, A. We -43e Skates ville Theather Corp. -/44 Shaver, ds 9.-439 Smith By ed - “9246, 3943, 299 | Saunders, Sar - ted Sharps, 2 Pe Marcin sue 224, Si, td Spillman, A. O- 456 Seabees E athe 209,212,344, par. States ville Used Auts barks, Lira, “Fed. Sout her, George Avyi! ed. 22 4 Sherrilt Avey. Paniel -#ed bi Shu Ford, Hermon £ “29/0, 2024 Son Ed. + Sons Ca. = me al Charles C.- 236,42, emacs ih La k . | : ies ‘i Pr itu! mn Sie ae eHh Ore, f APY! had. “ Shed, Gear ge. ~562,5/7 keke ek. tak tee ke Swain, hesker Kutus-$07 Suddre Ld bibby Ouan-54? Shiemaker, Widest alt Si Shitmeher Fe/i 7-509, 515 Serre Un Wilhiam Kichard -s/2 Shamake, Duis ht 520 Stutts, Bre dy Wh - sys Stewart, Ses K-45 4, 59% 599 Svith Lele J Mdass - SSH, 599 antth, Cle Bites. - 554,599 Shak nev, lle Sr, é h bs -~ $7, \ = ' Sener : ei Tay lov, Reath- 3/,39, 343,494 Tuclher, 4nos- 31, 343 Thorne burg, Billy James-S$2,2/7 ae 4 Tau chette, Vincent Lerey - 0 ‘ B Thempson, Thelma Wray 6 [win City Poutioe Co. - 144,409 Mm Thomas, Varia Nae -15/ [urner TF 9 Co.- Als Tucker, F. A. - 341 lurner, dake Riwdestian B62 316 476, 599 lake, Sarr = 41s, We hi | i i homas, Navgavet /1. ~YSb, 469, b#0 i, Me Thomas + Noward Co. « t Mc hary, Ine 490 ; ee Tilley, Wilhe Dean - 50% leant, Jamas. Seadbd -~Ib%, SS ¥ ‘i : Tyrer, Mayhew-£0, 5/9 : i / - Travis, James wv hLavena- S55 Neca tne 1 Stakes of Amer ica -293,198, 495% X® ‘ ‘ A “4 \ ¢ ~a VU AY +I a » Ai -se a 3 — —. ne ae Hal-219, 36 : Robert Nitehell -5/6 ~ a § = 3 =~ 5 2s = AsO” V; Woody, Rache-b Leen - 25 Shell. DD, - af, 206,843,399 White, Lukher~ 31,206 Veatherman Robert Freston-st.go? Ward, Thamas Whi thing Pan-33 Wilkinson, Edward Wher t-3¥/34 48 Bhs te Gerldine Luat lle - 35, 2%,286 Vell man, Cdeatl te Webb, Melnin Walt er- 38213 Weds, fred £, -%4 White, TAheas H. - Inde, 18 oe an Martha bus J Ad } j " Warren, James ha 126 ¥ Vellnen, Christopher C-1a6 Wilson, ViF-iat Narre n, Mrs. Rae ford-130 Waugh, W/ )- 140,404 i at FH. -143 9 % W aw 9 h, Eula B -/43 Ve Mack-2 OF, 21% 225,226,354, 86 Williams, dahn Edwerd-2/0,223 | f: / f ‘ Wi ns/ow, Win tord Arlic ~/4 f y + V¥ OOWm , af a 4,342 WhitQnery, TeEdVvgead Waugh, VB -229 464 | j Willrams, Mrs. A Willams, Clyde L. - 253 46,594 Waugh,C. B.- 253 } I} * Je 4? , Whilh Sir ertrude GC ~ A253, 164 Washingt on Mfg, Ca.- 272 Walker, Leelee Ann-tite Weeds, ti Plaids - 3329 Webster, Delphi ne a S32 Vite Mar gar Ce - 359, AL Vither s poon, dah n hee- ¥% Welba rn, Kenneth Edgar~443 White, Fear! P- 44S 444 Wal Key. Edith Lackey #0 W ilnbn, Rie baed Lae -#bk, 56% ie tn, Ark hur +. — 2/2, 369, 317,412, IF Whiklo W, Moyle Cleveland -225, 3b, ¥o9 Vhite, Jee -490 Wele 4, Sohn Gray ~\S02 Warren, CLES ard b/-504 Wingate, dachie- 528, £08, S/¢ Woed, fear! Diean Narris- 434,84- Mood, Wilbam pe Vh te, dames B-s5y Williams, de my Lavid-597 Windsor, Mrs. Jettic Mae - ill O. ~ 253, 464, 154% I9Az5ST3 Weavey, Mrs. Martha Eb zabeth- 354,357,339 8 7X4 Neskmereland se WA Mares ville ffearhings Heat ry lr York, Carolyn Charlene -2 7 > , 353 a Yor K, KaFhy Moe- 276,353 York Claudie V ~ 419 $34, $33 Pits eiieaeiismon se A Rh: pT i sapisrieih-looinenubiasiediesiiaasni Tienda sumbeteiisnooh! 4 amps NOW, THEREFORE, PY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff's cause of action and the ancillary remedy of clain ay delivery be, and the same is, hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that the Plaintisy ;, forever barred from instituting or maintaining another-action based UPON the inded owed it by the defendant. 5 2. That the defendant be, and he is hereby forever barred from instituting o maintaining any action against the plaintiff for its failure to file its complaint in this action or to further pursue its cause of action in this litigation, 3. That the defendant be taxed with the cost by the Clerk of Court, Signed and entered the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell ty in Statesville, North Carolina, on Decemher 3h, i95%s C, G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Trek] County. Consented to: C, H. Dearman C. H. Dearman of the Firm of Adams, Dearman, and Winherry, Attorneys for Plaintiff, QO. A. Clodfelter Defendant ee OK Ke ke kk me v# 576, TORTH CAROT Tiras NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Industrial Bank of Statesville, Inc, JUDGMENT.OF NON-SUJU!I! Mrs. Ruth G, Lackey and husband, Cecil w, Lackey ) ) ) VS. ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard before the Hon orable C. G, Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statenel of the counsel for the plaintirr ¢ hat the matters and things in controversy have “ agreed upon and settled, and that the Plainitff has acreed to take a non-suit a9 i ° his cause of action, and that the defendant has not filed answer. No : it j W, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintif! be non-suited 88 to his cause of actiog ’ and that the plaintiff be taxed with the costs. me the defendant th 5881 RTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PoRDELL COUNTY By Beam, eintiff, JUDGMENT vs 0, Johnson, & Fred Defendant, * his cause coming on © be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of This Ge i ‘or Court of Iredell County, upon Motion by the plaintiff for judgment azainst Superior ° : he defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed and Summons n nS issued in this action on the 23rd day of October, 1954; And it appearing to the Court that the said Summons together with a copy of y of October, 1954; said Complaint was served on the defendant on the 23rd day o er, 43 JOU! Demurr t! leading And it further appearing to the Court that no Answer, Demurrer, or cther pl ees : . = in Bhas been filed by the defendant, and that the time within which pleadings may be filed mhas expired; And it further apppearineg to the Court from the verified Complaint that the cause nm - ixe ff action consists of the breach of an express ccntract to pay a sum of money fixed t >) de rp", f) \ by the contract, to-wit: the sum of Seventeen hundred seventy and No/100 ($1770.00) tp bo 1S wae ate gcllars, with interest thereon from the 3.5 day of April, 1953, until paid at the ra of six per cent: And it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that the ee P ‘“ . F Yr n F pPaintiff claims the right to the possession of one 1950 Model Ford Deluxe Fordor automobile, Motor No, BONR-141390, in order that he may sell the same as provided in : <) - in , g ‘tain chattel mortgage executed by the defendant on April 29th, 1952, in Chattel “ortgaze Book #185, at pace 587, Iredell County Registry, and that ancillary to this m°ction the plaintiff caused to be issued claim and delivery papers for said property s2nd now has same in his possession; OW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and “cover f the defendant the sum of Seventeen hundred seventy and No/100 (§1770.00) Dcllars, with interest thereon from the 15 day of April, 1953; that the personal Property above described be sold at public auction, for cash, to the highest bidder * Said sale, after postingrnotice of said sale as provided in General Statute 1339.18, at the court house in Statesville, North Carolina, and to that end W, R. “attley ig “ppointed Commissioner of the Court and directed to sell the same as herein- ‘ove provided, and credit the amount received therefor, less the legal cost of said ‘S's Upon the monetary judgment herein rendered; and that the plaintiff recover of © cost of this action. , * his @th day of January, 1955, Ge Smith C qo A OCLC erk © uperior ourt ee te ee a, ey ee a ae ae oe ate a Wo. 5920 NORTH CAROLINA oll , CAROLINA Me psLL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT IREDELL COUNTY ) ody, Executrix Ann Gale Brown, pchel ae Deceased, Plaintiff, pr He Os Plainti vs. ; “cee eer,? JUDG MENT Holland B. Rrown, VSe Defendant. J} Fox and wife, This cause coming on to be heard, and heing heard hefore the Honorable > brtha Ce Fox, ' Defendants C. G. Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County » and it appearing coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the se 5 to the court that the time for answerine the Plaintiff's complaint, filed in this This cau u v m by laintiff for judement against n : County, vpon_motion by the p cause, has not elapsed and that the defendant herein has not in fact filed an angy, meamuperior Soom. of Iredel . £4 le fe, Bertha C. Fox, by default final; f ts J. R. Fox and wife, herein: and it further appearine to the court from the statement of the counsel fy he defendan the ple And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons leintiff that the plainsiff has elected to take a Non-Suit in her action. ? ; the plai e<ite h j ce ine * 1¢ ig ’ Ae: 4 OR 0 tD t ’ AD. \ D A ND DECRE n ne 3 u ies of And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with copies o n cher ; non-suited and be taxed with the costs to he charsed hv the Clerk. ; the 17th mgaid complaint were served on defendants J. R. Fox and wife, Bertha C. Fox on th This *th day of January, 1955, : h ay of December, 1951: Superior 2 or other Clerk of Superior Court em And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, « Consented to: io extension of leadings have been filed by the defendants or any one of them and no ex " : * . . s s ma — meme to file pleadines has heen granted and that the time within which pleadings may Attorney For eee pee filed has expired: pe : . : the cauce we 8 8h te ee ee And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that ' ixed — f action consists of the hreach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixe NORTH CAROLINA, . : 2 00 ($875.00) TREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. y the contract, namely the sum of EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE & NO/100 (4 : : d a ee SLURS, with interest thereon from May 18, 1953 until paid, and which sum is evidence 4 TSe rea lt. Harris, ) C dv; | Plaintire me’ 2 note made by defendants J. R. Fox and wife, Bertha C. Fox to H. C. Woodv; : have ‘ad vs NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered ,adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff hav i) ° IUD f EIGHT : Harvey Harris Tae nd recover of the defendants J. R. Fox and wife, Bertha C. Fox the sum of EI » “i, 8, | ) UNDRED SEVENTY FIVE & NO/100 ($875.00) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from May 1 This cause being heard before the jor Court of Iredel) County, 8953 until paid, and the costs of this action. Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk of the Supt This the 18 day of January, 1955. and it appearing to the Court that the defendmt, C. GC. Smith _ bonds of matrimony heretofore Clerk of the Superior Court defendant at the November Term, 195, Supe rcott, Collier & ‘Nash, That the Plaintirr in th ttorneys for Plainti ff, Jor Court of Tredell : County; tatesvilie, North Carolina. is action now desires to tt & voluntary non~suit; take a jud cst the Court finds as « tact the plaintiff is ertitled # ee ee ee © a judgment of voluntar ¥ Non-suit and that the ris, doe not resist such action, defendant, Harvey Harris, IT Is plaintiff be and —r, C. a oni th I erk 9 erior urt 0° Ir edel County “#4171, NORTH CAROLINA ) } IREDELL COUNTY ) MARY D. ASH CRAIG, Plaintiff - Vs. - LUDWIG ASH, JR., Defendant This Cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Judge assizned to hold Courts in the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, by consent of the parties to this action, and it appearing to the Court that Marv D, Ash Craic was cranted an absoln»te divorce from the defendant s Ludwig Ash, Jr., in the August 1914 Term of the Superior Court of Iredelj County: and it further appearing to the Court that the custody and control of the minor child of the plaintiff and defendant, Mary Davis Ash, was awarded to the plainitft Subject to an acreement previously entered into between the parties hereto; And it further appearing to the Court that upon in the May 1917 motion of the defendant mai Term of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carclina, the Judgnert granted in this matter concerning the custody , control and support of the said chili was set aside and partial custody and control of said child was awarded to the a ; s : defendant, and it further appearing to the Court that the judgement previously enterd j I % ) j 3 in this matter in the Aucust 191.7 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Ww : ‘orth C $ arolina, concerning the Custody, control and support of the minor child, Marv Davi h rs y Yavis Ash, was set aside hy 2sreement between the plaintiff and defendant i: the November 105 _ . ; 1954 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, at that ‘ e Custody, an order concerning th control and support of the minor child, Mary Davis Ash, was entered in the cause hb Y agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant: And it f i urther appearine to the Court was to have Custody of the Said minor child, Mary Davis Ash, during all the entire North Carclina Public School Years North C i except for one-half of the Chris arolina, excep and it appearing to the Court that under said Order that the defend m+, Carolina, o ris AS op ts to same and shall sign whatever affidavits, consents, or other papers sen ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the judement previously It i8, therefore, his matter in the November 1954 Term of Superior Court, Iredell County, ered in t cea concerning the custody, control and support of the minor child, Mary h. be and it is hereby set aside. is further ORDERED ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the plaintiff, Mary D. Ash It is fv ’ g her husband, James A. Craig, Jr., be granted custody and control of the nig, an e ’ Mary Davis Ash, it being understood by the Court that the said plaintiff, id minor, ’ D. Ash Craig and her husband, James A. Craig, Jr., will immediately institute yo ™ : ion proceedings for said minor child and that the defendant, Ludwig Ash, Jr., tion Z t ‘cating his consent, make whatever appearances that may be necessary, and do any dic e “? her acts which are reasonable and necessary to effect the adoption of said minor, fry Davis Ash, by James A. Craig, Jr. meal] not make anv further payments It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, Ludwig Ash, Jr. for the support of the said minor child, Mary Mavis Ash. further order of this Court. 1955. This cause is left open until This the 10th day of Januarv, Frank M. Armstrong Judce Assigned to Hold Courts in the Fifteen Judicial District of North Carolina The parties to the above action hereby waive any defect in procedure, jurisdiction, q venue, and consent to the entering of the above judgment. Mary D. Ash Craic | Plaintiff John H, Surratt Attorney for Plaintiff? ludwie Ash, Jr, Defendant Hugh G, Mitchell Attorney for Defendant. KR Kk ek Ke Rw ek Ok ek ok Ok OK feats CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Industrial Bank, Inc. Plaintiff JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT VSe D. Oxford Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the court that the defendant in this action paid the indebtedness claimed therein hy the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff never got possession of the property of the defendant: and it further appearing to the court that all matters and thines in controversy between the parties have heen settled and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsvit in its action: It is, therefore, ordered adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuite id be i 5 d and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 24 day of January, 1955 A+S)e C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court x ok ok ke ok ¥#5907 NORTH CAROL] NA bias coaeiy IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Godley Bros, Implement Co, Plaintiff JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SALE Brown Defendant ) ) vs. ) ) ) This cause comi 1% on to be heard before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon against the defendant bh motion by the plaintiff for judgner Vv default finals: of December, 195k: I u , app , , 5 uO sh Cc . : oO VU p 4 9 = v n he 22nd day of December, 1954 + ©O the court that no answer , defendan a: And it further appearing er pleading has been filed by the demurrer, or oth e . . nes has been granted, 4nd no extension of time to file pleadiné and that the And it further appearine to the cause of action court from the verified complaint that the Consists of the breac ey Fixed by the n of an express contract to apy a sum of mom contract, ‘rom the lé6th day Of December, 1954: + he sum of four hundred fifty-two and 50/100 ( $452." And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the n jaintiff claims the right to the possession of one Allis-Chalmers 1-B Tractor, Bes and one two-disc 1-B plow in order that the same may be sold oe a certain chattel mortgage executed by the defendant, and that neillary to this action the plaintiff caused to be issued claim and delivery papers bor said property, and thereunder now has the same in his possession: Wor sai Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have - eee Riss id recover of the defendant the sum of four hundred fifty-two and 50/100 ($452.50) 2 n a 4 Mllars, with interest thereon from the 16th day of December, 1954, that he be sored aunitied to the possession of the said propertv, and that the same be sold s by law provided and the amount received therefor, less the legal costs of said Bale, credited uponthe monetary judgement herein rendered, and that the plaintiff S scover’ Uf defendant the costs of this action. It is further ordered that the mproperty descrted above be sold at public auction, and to that end, Royce G. Gibson, M:. is appointed a Commissioner of this Court and as such Commissioner of this Court ul 0g SCHR Heebineloner is authorized and directed to sell said property at public BB ction at the courthouse door, Statesville, North Carolina, after due advertisement ney me! the said sale as provided hy law, and report to the Clerk the last and hiehest bid meade for the property at the said sale, and upon receipt of the purchase price there- ote or and upon confirmation of the said sale to execute and deliver to the purchaser me’ the property a bill of sale therefor, and out of the said purchase price the yoissioner is first to pay the costs of this action: retain to his own use as omissions five per cent of said purchase price, and the remainder of the said Purchase price to be applied to the indebtedness due on the iudgment herein rendered. ‘13 further ordered that the said Commissioner report his transactions in this atter to this Court upon the completion of the said sale as the law requires. This the 26th dav of January, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court OK Ke oe ke ke ok oe seek ook ook ok ok ok ok ok t ith ime within which Pleadings may be filed has oxpir®' IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK JANUARY TERM, 1955 Monday, January 31, 1955 IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY: TERM, 1995 Pe it remembered that A Superior Court heeun and held in and for the Coun 5 y and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 31st day of , ni iM we - January, 1955, at 10:00 o'clock A. Me, when and where His Honor, Frank M. Arnstro,, 2 Judge Presidinz and Holdine Courts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District of wi ‘ ee ee een ‘orth Carolina, Winter Term, 1955, is Present and presidinz, and Honorable Zeb ; ae “Orris, Solicitor and prosecutin=s Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial . or on 4 Nictri if Naw Cr ‘ sa ” : : istrict of North Carolina, is Present and prosecuting in the name of the State, d, Cc Riminle. we Sheri P Tred i Je OC. Rumple, veh Sheriff of Iredell 2ountv is present and opened Court by order Rumo Hieh c 2 ne f ; ple, Hich Sheri eof lredell County returns into open Court the names of the following scood and lawful men to Oo serve as jurors for this the THe £ 7T ? a Jan yt, arr anuary , SI 7. ae ) dy 4 ada tr i. ee : redell County Superior Court, for the first week, to-wit: G. C. Lambert M Wills I 3 "YSe Williar L. Allison John S. Meadors T oO Le Otevenson Morr I orrow Miss Cora Lee Stewart Gill a4 We ise Paul G. Teeter Moore Rohert Warren P rrer rs R, Horton 5. HY Holland, Jr My vT 4 " u * . a "rs. Yersie Fox Hollifield Paul Ss. B. KH. Stinson Mrs. Martha R. Tucker nee , e i. C. Plyler Parlier Woodrow Parks t Ross W. Whitman Wear, - Waugh Wade Marlowe Frooks W. Stewart H. R, Morrow R. Reid He KR, Morr Raymond R. Rei ioe Le Murphy Pp James K, Stroud R. Laws B. Troutman wx 3 W. We. Stone P. F. Murph L. Gregory es Joe FP, Moore i i. Cook : Jessie A. Coo Carroll McNeely John 7 y vOnn TT. 3 n Watt C. H. Thomas L. Thomas yW R ets “"enry E. Miller N. L. Boggs K. Suther . - Warren , Mrs. C - Sca rhoroush Ww M Jr. helene =. A. Malcolm, laudia Shul FP ‘ luienberg hant Clyde F. Souther ‘ er D. Olip 4e D. Greenwood Se elder Glenn Holland Virginia Blackw Charles Ai be Freeze He B. Munday Darwin 1 Gs Stkeleather aS excused by Judee, a a ° Shaver Biya etevenson w ies Paul G, Teeter, c Ve L “recor and 0 T} ° \ ~ Vv rs were not returned, oi aoe Glenn Holiand, J We. S haver were ®xcused by Doctor? Woodrow Parks and John § Meado Mrs. Martha R, A. Tucker, btea Searhorough, Z. D. Greenwood, and 8 Certificates. Virginia Blackwelder WaS excused bh v Miss Cora Lee Stewart was : excused by Clerk, C. Morrow is deceased, the Grand Jury, nN charge of the Grand Jury. B{ Cam) o. 1523 State vs Walt Coffer lO. 1A16 Ba State vs . D. Gray "0. 1644 State vs roy Fesperman lo. 1724 State vs oa. ). Wall Bio, 173L State vs i: Villard L. Dison ee NO. 1774, my State vs . L. Bill) Lackey 10. 1775 State vs vameron Harrison Hayes Wo. 1831 State vs heath Taylor », 1850 ate Vs e°yn0n Saunders Spann Bio, 1879 State vs ™S Tucker m0. 18a¢ State T. V8 ‘anes Campbell lo, lege State vs "her White IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK JANUARY TERM, 1055 Mondav, January 31, 1955 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT Alias Capias. DRUNK AND DISORDERLY Alias Capias. PERMITTING MANUFACTURING OF LIQUOR ON HIS PROPERTY C ontinued under former order, MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR Continued under former Order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Called and Failed. Instanter prozess. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias. POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR FOR SALE Continued under former order. ABANDON AND NON-~SUPPORT Continued. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Called and failed. Instanter process. No. 1891 State vs Covte Houston W-2), otate VS Charles Henry pr nr si INO. 2122 State vs lsiah Lewis Kennerly Knox IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IRST WEEK SANUARY TERM, 1955 Monday, January 31, 1955 ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT It appearing to the Court that at the August, 1953 ) of this Court the defendant entered a plea of nolo’ contendere to abandonment and non-support, aS appears 1 the minutes of this court, and was given a seitenes oro years on the public roads of the state as provided ty 1. which sentence was suspended 6n condition among other things, of this Court the sum of $12.00 each week for the gum, and maintenance of Sheffie Eugene Houston, th first payment to be made on or before August 10, 1953, anda like arount on each Monday thereafter, to be disbursed , provided by said judsment, and it now appearing to the. fourt andthe Court finding as a fact that the defendant has wilfully violated the terms of this admits that he is $432.00 in arrears: I therefore, ordered that commitrent issue to the end that the defendant be required to serve the sentens heretofore imposed. judgement, and roy te 5 S 9 N-TAX PAID LIQUOR under former order. O OPERATOR'S LICENSE Ailas iu Capias. nmr RECKLESS DRIVING Alias Capias. oi headi as DRIVING DRUNK a“ : vOontinued under former vontinued under former that the defendant pay into the office of the ruil IN THE FIRST WEEK Monday, Kos. 198% & 19#9 State vs J on Wanda Jean Henderson Nose 2050 & 2051 State vs atwell Ulysses Teenhour Enos. 210% & 2109 State vs James William Campbell Nos. 2173 & 217k State vs ad William Nicholson jowbrav No, 2186 State v8 Robert McClelland Alias lune BAnks Acs, 2192 State vs Billy Wilson Shinault Alias Rill Shinault Mo. 2193 } State Vv $ fdward Richard Scott Alias | Ed Seott 1 vio. 2194 { State i VS } Alton William Cummines Alias} Tom Cummings No. 2214 State vs William Henry Bradshaw No, 2211 State VS Thom t . e 9 shomas Whittineton Ward ‘No, 2215 state vs “erndon Albert Beaver No. 2155 vtate _ VS “ames Ralph Lambert No, 2163 State VS } evi Parson Surles NPERTOR COURT — ” JANUARY TERM, 1955 January 31, 1955 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT: NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE ‘Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Fa & Capias Instanter. DRIVING DRUNK: DRIVING ATER LICENSE REVOKED Defendant Galled and failed. Judgement Nisi Fa & Capias Instanter. ASSAULT: SSAULT ON FEMALE Defendant called and failed. Fa & Capias Instanter. Judement \ TE} TCORNSE REVOKED DRIVING DRUNK: DRIVING ATER LIChNoS EVOKED C j rent Nisi Defendant “alled and failed. Judgement Nis Fa & Capias Instanter-. FORGERY BY ENDORSEMENT Defendant called and failed. Fa & Capias Instanter. Judament BREAKING? ENTERING * LARCENY Defendant called ard failed. Fa & Capias Instanter. Judgement AKING, ENTERING 4 LARCENY efendant galled and failed. Tq & Capias Instanter. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY | Deferdant called and failed. Fa & Capias Instanter. Judgment DRIVING DRUNK Hale Defendant called and failed. Fa & Capias Instanter. Judement Nisi DRIVING DRUNK : Remanded to the Recorder's Court to comply with Judement. SIVING DRUNK aes age ocr to the Recorder's Court to comply with Judement. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. SPEEDING Continued. IN THE SUPERIOR COtRT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---weecanun JANUARY ‘TERM. 3 pins? WERK --------- JANUARY PERV. 1055 Monday, January 31, 1955 a . Monday, January 31, 1955 Mos. 220k & 2205 POSSESSING 49 1/2 GALLONS NON-TAx paqp , BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY | e State | POSSESSING 49 1/2 GALLONS NON = piQUOR: = ER tio, 2195 A Trve Bill baie tee SALE TAX PAID LIQUOR 9p state | aura Mae Hunter Continued, - J ! - John Dewey Jarvis, JT e Nos. 2181 & 2182 | ATTEMPT ARSON: cCONSP IG, EN N N - e E VS IRE TO BURN a 4 , . ) BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY State | True Bills,. , SU No, 2196 A Trve Bill. ua ane \ state nés Maynor } ioe Se Jarvis, Jr. | ‘Nos. 216s. f 212) } CONSPIRE ' { I \ Y , NSE TO BURN BUILDING: ar EM ; a | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ey True Bills. TEMPT ARSON psc | A True Bill. William E Nav . ! illiam Earl Mavner } ane MeMuller } a ne | CONSPIRE TO BURN BUILDING No. 2229 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON vs | A rue BIka, State A True Bill. ! ; j x; B, Staton va , = Gerldine Lucille White 1 No, & 2234 } BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY my llgs 2299 vs” | True Bills Howard Cleveland State True Bills. - vs me Willie McAuley Pharr io. 2127 . eo Nos. 2237 & 2238 } BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCEN State ! SREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY By State } True Bills. es | A True Bill, : vs } Edward Albert Wilkinson Nathan Shine No. 2193 en Nos, 2222 & 2223 } BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY State BREAKING, ENTERING Rg LARCENY a State i True Bills. vs A True Bill, vs Edward ‘ichard Seott Geneo Bruce Flerine Alias Alias Ed Scott Gene Flerine — e ee — Ao. 2192 eee m ‘Nos. 22122213 | NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: DRIVING DRUNK State NGAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY State } The defendant throuch his counsel in open court Billy | " Tepe Bill, ee 7 } enters a plea of suilty as charzed in the bills Billy Wilson Shinanit Henry Russell Foote | of indictment. Alias Bill Shinauit ~40 | The defendart in open court, throuch his counsel, | consents that prayer for judgment be continued No. 210) } until the May, 1955, Term of this Court. . 7 ty St t = } RRE K NS Rr ; 9 sy Trae Ree TERING © LARCENY No. 2110 DRIVING DRUNK 5 a. . 3 : ) u y oe WA 11 4am Cummines j State The defendant enters a plea cf cuilty. 7 *om Cummings V8 The judgment of the Court is that the defendant Odell Wellman be confined in the common jail of Iredell County INo. 2196 e328 for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, to be assigned to do State } FoRG labor on the public roads of the State as provided Robert NMeClel} } eee By consent of the defendant in open court and at Alias J “ete an j his specific request, this prison term is suspended ! for a period of two years aiana Sollevitg SO Ty a 1. That he pay a fine of ° an No. 2199 the action. State } ASSAULT WITH 2. That he remain of good behavior, not violate any Jo T i | True Mite WEAPON of the laws of this state, particularly the motor woe Lewis Steve; : vehicle laws. ee ! 3. That he not operate a motor vehicle in the State | of North Carolina for a period of one year. NO. 2145 In the event the defendant violates any of " mess ASSAULT wrry DEADLY Pc gn esol ae, lb Ree semen: a teeue. Robert, Smith A True Bil), WEAPON said two year period, capias and c YNo. 2145 State vs Robert Smith C-22 JNo. 19 e O. 1ORL & 1985 tate vs James Groce JNo. 2210 State vs Cranford W-38 INo, 2199 State vs Joe Lewis Stevenso Or-ewrnty Andrew Laws , A Harwell edintel « LL EE SE EN er Ee SE MR Lo A A ME NE A I Se ee Pe <—_ << = 7s ! aoe SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WE JANUARY Monday, January 31, 1955 TERM, 1955 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant enters a plea of not cuilty through pj 8 Attorney, Mr. WwW, R Battley, whe -~@ . . Ate J Preu on was sworn and impanelled: ° co following dry n Q w t G. _ i W. K. Suther He C. Plyler Clyde F, South Brooks W. Stewart ve G. B. Troutman J. Carrol] MeNeely He Lis 7 ‘ At the close of the State? raws his plea of not cuilt ple f z y and ent assault with deadly weapon, a re pa ine judement of the Court is that the defe i i jail of Iredel? County for a term of fe E (12) MONTHS, to be assiened to do labor on the hl roads of the State as Provided by law, o sy consent of the defendant in open Specific request, this prison followinz conditions: 1. That he pay the cost of 2e That he the sum of He B. Munday irs. William L. R. Y. Gill oie Charles A, Freeze S evidence the defendant With-. ndant be cop. court and at his sentence is Suspended on the ae ee Sere action, vy into e office of the Clerk of this Co isbn os 951.00 to be disbursed by said Clerk to Dr..1. | ; het ; balance due on doctor bills for Garfield Jones, + inat he pay into the office of the the sum of 4200.00 i i patie: UU » to be } : proper receipt, to qiqbureed by said Clerk, upon Garfield Jones t j ee o Garfi © reimburse him for los; prea ase oe paid in installments of $50.00 Per month, th aoe payment to be made on the 15th day of February, 1655 1d ike Sum on the 15th day of each ter =e — full sum of $200.00 is paid Le al t ? } ; tee at he remain of good behavior and not violate any cue of this state, | n tne event the defendart violates any of the terms of this Qe e V e nent time durin > 4 > nt at an $1 Ss g : caplias and co mi ’ ent tc issue, FAIL TO SHOW DRIVERIS HOW DRIVER'S LICENSE: Defend ant enters a plea of not euilty through his Attorney goa wae st 7? “re John Lewis lowi was sworn and impanelled: —— on ms Ge C, Lambert we <, Plyler DRIVING DRUNK Clyde F. Souther Brooks W, H. B. Munday G. B, detcceeere Mrs. William L. Allison ‘° Carroll McNeely L. C. Stikeleather K, Suther G. ie Moore lhe jur cae S. R. Holland, Jr. vY returned a verdict of euilty as charged. We SPEEDING Defendan Suilty of zone, °Pters a plea of/speeding 55 mph in a 35 mile Judement of ; the common selec that the defendant be confined ta edell County fo f THIRTY a assi ra term ot tate as Provided hy sa0° labor on the public roads of tht Y consent ; r¢ of th n Sentence is su aoe a0S6 da followings co “pended f y ndit . + That b ions: nt in open court, this priso or a period of one year on the $35.00 and the cost of the acti¢ © st of good behavior and violate a peg a In the event th » Particularly the motor vehicle la: © defendant violates any of the terms ° » Capias a a Subsequent time during said one. n commitment to issue, : a in the ¢ t is that the defendant be EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS tt of Iredell County for a term of Public roads of the arese? assigned to do labor on She, hs ate as provided by law. Clerk of this Com [iM ns, 2188, 2189, 2190 & 2191 State S vard Cleveland Pharr | > mrs, Versie Fox Hollifield % Mos. 2200, 2201, 2202 & -19 ay lola 3AQtA+ fl ed font State & vs erry Morton eroy Hamlin, Jr Edward Albert Wilkinson Alias ddie Wilkinson Biax Parker The followint cood and lawful men and women were duly drawn and sworn as the rand Jury to serve for the six months period ending John T. Watt Ravmond R. Reid '. R. Horton John R. Laws TS. Claudia Shulenberser A. W, Maleolm, Jr, we Boers Darwin M, Lundy ah B J By This # at 9339 O'clock 4, M, 2203 2187 IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK Monday, January 31, 1955 Offs was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. Goforth was sworn as Officer in charge of the Grand Jury. *norable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, february 1, 1955, JANUARY TERM, 1955 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY. Defendant enters a plea of suiltyv. In No. 218% let the counts he consolidated, and it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the Central Prison at Raleich for a term of not less than FIVE (5) nor more than TEN (10) YEARS, to be assigned to do labor as provided by law. In No. 2189, let the counts be consolidated, and the judgement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Central Prison at Raleigh for a term of not less than NINE (9) nor more than TEN (10) YEARS, to be assiened to do labor as provided by law. This sentence to commence after the expiration of the sentence in No. 2188, and, by consent of the defendant in open court, is suspended for a period of five years on condition that the defendant remain of good beha ior and not violate any of the laws of this state or of the United States of America, In the event the defendant violates any ¢ terms of this judement at any subsequent time during said term, capias and commitment to issue. In Nos. 2190 and 2191, prayer for judgment is continued straicht. the BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY x ' Defendants through their Attorneys, Mr. W. R. Battley and Mr. John Lewis, erter a plea of guilty of attempted Larceny. Defendants through their Attorneys, waive the bill of indictment. July 30, 1955, to-wit: H. R. Morrow Robert Warren Paul S. Parlier James K. Stroud Joe F. Moore H. L. Waugh Henry E. Miller E. L. Murphy } B. H. Stinson Alo. 2217 State vs I. V. Jack Mitchell Wo. 2221 State vs Melvin Walter Wehb No. 2226 State Vs Robert Shaw Prown No. 2197 State vs Clarence Houston No. 2192 State vs Georve William Campbell Ino. 2199 State vs Joe Lewis Stevenson Inos. 2206. 2207 State VS Tam ah ‘ James Borders, Sr. INo. 2133 State vs ma Je 4 Raby ‘No. 2227 State vs Sam Eugene Sims No. 2229 State vs Gerldine Lucille White ‘No. 2231 State vs Mildred C. Knox ‘Nos. 2222 & 2 State wi vs Geneo Bruce F] Gene Fleming r mine Alias <a ee ee oe ee ee OS —— oe oe ee ete ee ee meneneune reams seams es ec eee nace eee Ne oo IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 1, 1955 ; DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the term, SPEEDING Continued for the term, DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the term. ASSAULT ON FEMALE sontinued, ASSAULT WITH Conti nued wie DEADLY WEAPON BASTARDY Continued, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY 3 : WEAPON CVontinued, - POSSESSING 22 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID MALT BEVERAGES: ce sae 22 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID MALT BEVERAGES BREW. war CDSHSSING MATERIALS FOR MANUFACTURING 40% W. MANUFACTURING ROME Continued, BREW ASSAULT WITW INTENT TO Continued, COMMIT RAPE DRIVING DRUNK Continued, ASSAULT wIty DEADLY Senkinnae. WEAPON ABANDON OF CHIL Continued, DREN BY MOTHER BREAKING, ENTE Garinaas TERING & LARCENY ters a plea of muilty. Now 2232 & 2233 be State $ - wie Richard Redfern B Curtis Rorie Me ios, 2230 & 2231 State vs ® Jake White Goodman m Prisco Lane Wo, 2133 = State vs J, J, Raby S ixo, 1831 State : vs A feath Taylor Wo, 2214 State : vs s William Henry Bradshaw i Nos, 221¢, 2219, & 2220 State vu Luther Fred Siemon ‘Nos 2216 - @6otate vs Harold Franklin Rector We38 "No. 2225 m tate Vv Ss talph Preege \y No. 218 State ; RR By Staton SN I ae SR Pr ep ee ce Ne I IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK Tuesday, February 1, 1955 JANUARY TERM? 1955 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill. LARCENY AND KILLING OF CALF A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT RAPE A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order on condition of payment of cost. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of zuilty. RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED Defendant called and failed. and Capias Instanter. DRIVING DRUNK: Judgement Nisi Sci Fa SPEEDING Defendant enters a plea of guilty of speeding 55 mph in a 35 mile zone, throuczh his Attorney, Mr. John McLaughl The judgement of the Court is that the defendant he confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a tern of THIRTY (30) DAYS to be assigned to do labor on the public roads of the State as provided by law. By consent of the defendant in @pen court and at his specific request, this prison term is suspended upon the payment of a $35.00 fine and cost. TRESPASSING Defendant enters a plea of cuilty through his Attorney, Mr. Grant Bolmer. The judement of the Court is that the defendant he confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THIRTY (30) DAYS to be assigned to do labor on the public roads of the State as provided by law. By consent of the defendant in Open court, this prison sentence is suspended for TWELVE (12) MONTHS on condition that he pay the cost of the action, remain of good behavior, and not trespass on the lands of Mr. Ostwalt, the prosecuting witness for a period of two years. In event the defendant violates any of the terms of this judement at any subsequent time during said twelve months period, capias and commitment to issue. CONSPIRE TO BURN BUILDING Defendant enters a plea of not guilty through his Attorneys, Mr. Fred G. Chamblee and Mr. Coble Funderburk, whereupon the following jury was sworn and impanelled, ' G. C. Lambert Brooks W. Stewart E. C. Plyler G. B. Troutman J, Carroll MeNeely Ross W. Whitman Claude F. Souther H. B. Munday Wade Marlowe Claude A. P, F. Murph S. R, Holland, Jr. . Lars nents oS am Ktos. 21¢1, 2182, 2183 & 214) State vs James F, Maynor William Earl Maynor Nos. 2195 & 2196 State Vv s John Dewey Jarvis, Jr. a i Ci 3 | : ~ + \Nos. 2230 & 2210 State vs Vincent Leroy Tou ’ r Jack H. Hanson oe 41 ° IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --~"------ JANUARY TERM, 1055 Tuesday, February 1, 1955 IN THEMBUPERTOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesdav, February 1, 1955 ; .© money paid to the prosecuting witness? in this case, ein Court in pronouncing judgment in these case ‘es into consideration the case now pending i Alexander County wherein the defendant is char’ with Breaking, Entering and respect” fully suecests nz, and Larceny, , that no further punishment bé meted Out in the Alexander County caied none cf the laws of this state, particularly the motor vehicle laws. 3. That he not operate a motor vehicle for a period of one year from this date. In the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this judement at any subsequent time during said ‘two year period, capias and commitment to issue. : . - iin | ATTEMPT ARSON: CONSPIRE TO BURN BUILDING hea 2236 ama Oita Gt Gdieh Gstere h nlce of suilty | an a their Attorneys, Tt & i, | er } Let the counts be consolidated for judgment, and it sm vy, dre, enters a plea of fuilty, | Willie McAuley } is the judgement of the Court that the defendants vathan ghine . ate and each of them be confined in the common jail of Ps ee ee sual ef 7 FS Iredell County for not less than TWELVE (12) nor : noi } more than EIGHTEEN (12) MONTHS, to be assiened to ; Orato one of pce pert Offender's Camps in ais al ihe : ae 18 state as provided by law, it a earing to th ! BREAR a, SuTeR ING & LARCENY } Court that the defendarts are male chiar boys oes < efendant enters a plea of auilty in hoth fe | 21 vears of ave who have never heretofore served a caseS, throuch his Attornéy, Mr. Eucene Trivet } prison term. ! In No. 2195, let the counts he consolidated fe . | judement, and on the consolidated counts it fen, 7 | judement of the Court that the defendant be co. MMM los. 2235 & 2237 } BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY } fined in the Central Pri { ; = “a i ntral Prison at Raleigh for a ten State i The defendants enter a plea of cuilty. | of not less than THIRTY (30) and not more tha, fae Let the counts be consolidated Au he Judem | SIXTY (40) MONTHS te be assigned to do labors MA Willie Fae Eke Geort th iefendants deh cr Shea be. : . mned to do labor as Willie McAuley of the Court that the defendants and each of them be provided bv law. Nathan Shine } confined in the common jail of Iredell County for j _ Tn No. 2196, let the counts be consolidated fer } a period of not less than THIRTY-SIX (34) nor more ee ee is the Judgment ee the Court that } than SIXTY (60) MONTHS to be assigned to do labor on poe gc eonams e confined in the Central Prison « { the public roads of the State as provided by law.. Raleich for a term of not less than FIVE (5) nor {| This sentence to commence after the expiration of more than TEN (10) YEARS to be assiened to do lay | the sentence in 2236 and 2238, and by consent of the afise the ae —_ thie sentence to commence 5 } deferdants in open court and at their specific 7 by eenamett eee “ the sentence in No, 2195, j request, this prison terr is suspended for a period ik etn o t e efendant in open court art {of FIVE (5) YEARS on condition that the defendants apeaiea fee” rg) this prison senssaee } remain of goood behavior and not violate any of the | followine sondtitciel of FIVE (5) YEARS on the } laws of this state or of the United States of America. oe “2 7 oneae) 2 Pe { In the event the defendant violates any of the wees ee : efendant remain of good behavior ik | terms of this judsment at any subsequent time during ig he . e any of the laws of this state or } said FIVE (5) YEARS period, capias and commitment to ae Saeoenies State of America during said period } issue. poe 42a he pay into the office of the Clerk o’ é ‘ or. =: the sum of $290.50 to be disbursed by oe | DRIVING DRUNK Tavicweer ti upon proper pecet ye. te FCX store, | Bom : The defendant enters a plea of cuilty through his | 2783.00 to me aed Carolina, the further .* cane aii ! Attorney, Mr. Grant Bolmrer. 81.0 60 aa wae ° Mayberry, and the sum 0 ag « Matheson ! The judgment of the Court is that the defendant - ee ites obert F, Rash. ; ahi } be confined in the common jail of Iredell County eee ays s Sess of this action for which the | for a term of SIX (4) MONTHS to be assicned to do "iy Shas alent be paid. a k } labor on the public roads of the Stare as provided Bs sgt oek wad in sixty days after the a. : } by law. ae aaa ce papses in No. 2195 Coe ee : ' By consert of the defendant in open court and at { the sun of 830-00 ice of the Clerk of geo oe |} his request, this prison sentence is suspended for | the office of th Se month until he nei ! a period of two years on the followine conditions: 1 said sums of wena oo te ake on oh eea oat Po Ph wi ee ; i e action. | for te Dewey Jarvis, Sr., to reimburse hin : 2. That he remain of stood behavior and violate ! | ! ' | ' es No, 2230 } BREAKING. ENTReTYr Stat LARCENY AND KILLING OF CALF 1 Judeuctt eo ee & LARCENY Count’: a Defendant enters a plea of nolo contendere to 1 See jacket or there cases entered in Wilkes 1” Jake White g Larcagy of property of the vahe of less than $100.00. | vacxet in file for copy of the judgments W-40 “9 soodman The judement of the Court is that the defendant i bowie be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for Teel, a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS to be assigned to. do corer on the public roads of the State as provided by law. ee Pty SUPERIOR COURT WEEK ----—---—— JANUARY ° Tuesday, February 1, mae 1955 tes 2933 LARCENY AND KILLING OF CALF are beng wh iad enters a plea of nclo contende a $100 0 Cree eere es of the value of less tha * Wek] P400.00, throuch his Attorney, Mr, Georg ” é tae Jridement of the Court is that the d ae } he confined in the common jai] of Ired 1 fefendan ! for a term of TWELVE (12) montis te be i petty f } to do labor on the pinblie roads cf the oe { provided by law. ate as \No. 22 L QQart ’ pm oo | cnr WITH DEADLY WEAPON ae ! the defendant enters a pl f faa | With D : p ea of snilty of Assay); arover McMullen ! aeriee Weapon, through his Attorney, lr. I a? The judement of The Court i Judemer is that n be confined in the common jail of Tredeliean 4 | 1oro2 term of SIX (6) MONTHS to be assigned ton fm on t 5 are iM ered: e public roads of the State AS provided Hie No. 2232 iti week s otate | pases iG, ENTERING & LARCENY vie Defendant enters a plea of cuilty, Jack Richard tedfern \ INo. 2233 booty PREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY ot Defendant enters a Plea of not zuilty through his Attor Mr f i lion en! Mr + John McLauchlin, whereupon the a+ Ow Jury was sworn and impanelled: 4¢ C. Lambert BE. C. Plyler i Curtis Rorie n : i Srooks W, | a S ¥. stewart Charles A. Freeze G. B. T + ; * +routman J. Carroll Meleely We K. Suther Clvde F. Souther Re 8. es ; 3 : “unday Mrs. William L, Allie Se A ee ee ee EE eS Cie ‘ aes otikeleather S. R. Holland, ¢r. pe “ng ‘rial Solicitor takes Nol Pros With Lea. ii o IN THE SUPERIOR COURT .... FIRST WEEK --------- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 1, 1955 GRAND JURY REPORT JANUARY TERM, 1955 The Grand Jury found true bills of indictment on all cases presented by the Solicitor. Committees visited and inspected the following County Properties: COUNTY JAIL We were conducted on a tour by Jailor Sam Laws and found the jail to be in excellent condition with the last rating heing 98%. We found the following npigoners; Thirteen (13) colored men, Six (6) white men, makinz a total of Nineteen (19) prisoners. COUNTY HOME At the County Home we found the following inmates: White female 163; white male 12: colored females 7: colored males 5: making a total of 40. We also found the following prisoners: Four (4) white men and Two (2) colored men. We found the entire premises of the County Home in fair condition. PRISON CAMP At the Prison Camp we found it to be in excellent condition, with a total of 114 prisoners. The three compartment sink recommended by the previous Grand Jury has not vet been installed and this Grand Jury feels that this should be done: also a stove pipe to one of the heaters in the cell block be replaced; otherwise in good condition... COURT HOUSE We found the Court House in fairly good condition but recommend that the State Probation office and the ASC office in the basement he painted. In the Welfare Building we found that some electrical repairs were needed in wall receptacles, | We found all other departments in good condition. N. L. Boggs ——— N. L. Boges, Foreman This 1955, at 9330 o'clock A. M Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, February 2nd, No. 2232 State vs Jack Richard Redfern Nos. 1984 & State vs James Groce Harwell W=-33 1985 \No. 2214 State vs William Henry Bradshaw We ld, : OP >t p02 4 Cos / ‘ f FIRST WEEK -------- JANUARY TERM, 1955 LLL A NE NC SR NS Me I ee a ee AE A SS OE EE I ES EE ed ee ES <r ee ee ee ee ee ce ee ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT Wednesday, February 2nd, 1955 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY It appearing to the Court is a eae colored vouth under apparently, who has never hereto prison term, it is therefore the Ween ay the Court, on the first count, that he b . confined in the common jail of Iredell ¢o for not less than TWELVE (12) nor more ” THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS to be assiened to dy labor at one of the First Offenders camps of this state as provided by law. On the second count, let the defendant be confined in the common jajl of Iredell County for not less than THIAT Es 36) nor more than SIXTY (60) MONTHS to be assigned to do labor on the public réads of ‘the State aS provided by law. This sentence to commence after the expiration of the sentence on the Breaking and Entering count, and, by consent of the defendant is suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS on condition the defendant remain of sood behavior, not violate any of the lavs of this state, and engage in some gainful that the defends 21 years of any.” 2 occupation in so far as the economic conditions of the times permit. in the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this tudement at any subsequent time during said five year period, capias and commitment to issue. FAIL TO SHOW DRIVER'S LICENSE: DRIVING DRUNK Jndement of the Court is that the defendant pe confined in the common jail of Iredell Couty 1or a term of SIX (6) MONTHS to be assigned t do labor on the public roads of the State as provided by law, By consent of the defendant in open court, this prison sentence is suspended for a perio of two years on the followng condition: 1. That he pay a fine 6f $150.00 and the cost of the action. 2. That he remain of good behavior, not violate any of the laws of the state, and not Operate a motor vehicle during said pertod. in the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this judgment at any subsequent - time during Said two vear period, capias = commitment to issue, DRIVING DRUNK The judement of the Co defendat" ba a : urt is that the de = confined in the common jail of Iredell Gout) de tae oe (6) MONTHS to be assigned ' Pr on the publi State 4 Provided by ia lic roads er the er consent of the defendant in open court on co entence is suspended for TWO (2) oA ond ene eee the defendant pay a fine of ' Ne cost of this action, that he remain ° of thee tor and not violate any ¢& the laws ,° State, and that he not operate 4 M0 vehicle on the ubli ) ¢ Als this sta for @ period ee dna cei of Nos. 2181 & 2182 State vs tanes F. Maynor yo19 ,) § P19 be +f Anhe tog Bil W am 5 Loyte Houston { | | Edward os. 2184 & 2183 State ; vs illiam Earl Maynor us y . J Oorgy tiger en dy 4a he Lei / f< NO, 189] State vs No, 2192 State vs ‘lly Wilson Sh i s 4 Alias BY} Sa. No. 219 State ; vs Rich Alias Rq oc Scott No, 219, State _ IN THE SVPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK. ---------- JANUARY TERM, 1955 “Wednesday, February 2, 1955 <8 poe ATTEMPT ARSON: CONSPIRE TO BURN BUILDING The judgement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of not less than EIGHTEEN (18) nor more than THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS to he assizned to do labor on the public roads of the State as provided by law, In No. 2182, the judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the Central 'rison at Raleigh for a term of not less than FIVE (5) nor more than TEN (10) YEARS, to be assigned to do labor as required by law, This sentence to commere after the expiration of the sentence imposed in No. 2181, and, by consent of the defendant in open court, is simended for a period of five years on condition that he remain of cood hehavor and not violate any of the laws of this state or the United States of Amorica. In the went the defendant violates any of the terms of this judgement at any subsequent time durine said five year period, capias and commitment to issue. ATTEMPT ARSON: CONSPIRE TO BURN BUILDING The judzrent of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell Sounty for a term of not less than THERTY-SIX (36) nor more than SIXTY (460) MONTHS to he assigned to do labor on the public roads of the State as provided by law. In No. 2143, the judement: of the Court that the defendant be confined in the Central Prison at Raleigh for a term of not less than FIVE (5) nor more than TEN (10) YEARS, to be assigned to do labor as required by law. This sentence to commence after the expiration of the sentence imposed in No. 2184, and, bv consent of the defendant in open court, is suspended for a period of five years on condition that he remain of zood behavior and not violate any of the laws of this state or of the United States of America. It has been susgested to the Court by counsel that the defendant William Earl Mavnor, has suffered some injury to his back and it is ordered that he be given a thorouch physical examination before he is required to do any physical labor, and that the Director of Prison notify this Court, through the Clerk of this Court, when said examination has been completed and the result thereof. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT The tudement heretofore is striken out and by consent of the defendant, prayer for judement is continued to May, 1955, Term of this court on condition that the defendant pay into the office of the Clerk at this term the sum of $200.00 to be disbursed to Betty Jean Houston; and that he pay the balance by said May Term, together with the current monthly payments and give a bond in the sum of $200.00 for his appearance at said term. If the payment is not paid and the current payments kept up to date,commitment will issue at May Term. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Continued. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Continued. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Continued. INo. 2122 State vs Isiah Hill 2222 & 2233 e Bruce Fleming Gene’ Fleming This Honorable Court takes recess at 10:00 O'clock A, ne I} FIRST WEEK ee ee es a PR eee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ~- JANUARY TERM, Wednesday, February 2, 1955 LARCENY Complied with Court Order. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY In No. 2222, let the counts be consolidated for jfudement. It appearine to the Court that the defendant ig g male white youth who says he is under 21 vears of ac and who has apparently never heretofore served any prison term, it is therefore ordered that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Trede}} county for a period ef not less than TWELVE (12) nor more than THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS, to be assiened to do labor at one Of the First Offender Camps of thi; State as provided by law. In No. 2223, let the defendant be confined in the common jail for a period of not less than THIRTY-SIi (36) nor more than SIXTY (40) MONTHS, to be assignei to do labor on the public roads of the state as provided hy law, this sentence to commence after the expiration of the sentence in No. 2222, and, by consent of the defendant in open court, is suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS on condition that the defendant remain of cood behavior, not violate any of the laws of this date or of the United States of America, In the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this judement at’ any subsequent time durin Said five year period, capias and commitment to issue CONSPIRE TO BURN BUILDING p J } ; > . Judre withdrew Jurors, ordered a mistrial. I or Continued until May Term, 1955, until Monday Morning, February 7th, 195% Std I’ THS SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ JANUARY TERM, 1955 Monday, February 7, 1955 N THE SUPERIOR COURT yoRTH CAROLINA JANUARY TERM, 1955 IREDELL COUNTY This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourrent on Monday Morning, 7, 1955 at 10:00 o'clock A. M., with Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Judze February / ‘dine and holding Courts of this Fifteenth Judicial District, Winter Term, presiding ? 1955, present and presiding. io. 5752 Yorth Carolina Iredell County In the Superior Court Janmary Term, 1955 aude J. Eagle } | Vs a ' ' Southern Railwav Company This cause coming on to he heard before his Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, at 4 - - 4 * * that r r-+ ic ) this term of the Superior Court and it appears to the Court that parties to hf : ot 2 Or Imo 4 +he 5Oo f Pp A. this action have settled this action at the same time that the action of P. A Eagle was settled and by azreement Plaintiff in this action is not entitled to recover anythine of tne defendant. It is therefore, by asreement, decreed that plaintiff recover nothing in her action and that the action be and it is dismissed. . . . } ” * . By azreement the defendant has acreed to and it is taxed with the cost of this action. Frank M. Armstrong Presiding Judge 2y Agreement yr YH. Ws waa Baxter H. Finch Re A, Hedrick Tor Flamed tf ees Tee Ae Collier “Lorneys for Defendant “ IN THE SUPERTOR COURT SECOND weEK ~---~-. JANUARY TERM 1955 Monday, Februarv 7, 1955 - No. 5752 NORTH CAROLINA i IREDELL COUNTY In the Superior Court Before the Clerk i aivais oo ; QYOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY Lnis Cé use con ad i 0€ ‘ a 4 ne by a> OT} vy ~ tf arc | ~ 118s 0 4 * 4 a k i A iif , | | £ 1 e ¢ ¢ € e j JE or e } i I ° T I MM, a iS rone af ee! VILL» anc 1t pr 2a i] ; 1 ’ + f 3 Ve U 7 be ] t Cnat ‘lai nti and D id 2Y , } e j a sears 1e ¢ I } i f 4 € .@ aul lave g eed Ll to a settlement be C Sev sINnen yetw en hen [ ; I veen themselves: that hy the terms of the | 2 te * the acreement P} i Lets pendven aha eae en aintiff e¥MVOL Cne Sum Of Sis hundead - as olx hundred dollars in complete and final sett] and all matt ; i ae aa n+ matters due or micht be due to him hy le t im oy the defendant “rowing out of ~ i , . a4 sy Of y the collision alleged in the complaint [¢ i +} rafarnr ; | ea S therefore, adjudeed and decreed that plaintiff 2; >creed th; intiff recover tl Cant the sum of SIx 5 coat ae ETP rome | eo HUNDRED DOLLARS» that VLLAMNO $ nat the def a 3 eee *Fendant pay the cost of this Frank M. Armstrong Acreed tas rresiding Judge ———Baxter H. Finch root A. Hedy 1 ak rOr ‘Fis nti fe eames pote As Col] ier ACGt rneys for Defendany ee ae The vr a a ee ee ers Nn er of the As c Q) av 8S taker p in hear? - 2 on the Motion Doct ring pre-trial matters and case? . { This T 'S Honorable Court tal ” vaKES rOCaee at 10:00 ote} eee ES Leen ot v E O"cloe ANeESday M , lock A, mM, yY “orning, February @, 1959 hc Ui JUDGE FRES IN THS SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 8, 1955 this Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, rebruary 8, 1955 at 10:00 o'clock A. M. J. C. fumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the second week of the January Term, 1955, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: c, ¢. McLaughlin J. R. Powell rR, F, Murdock J. F. Crater D. L. Dingler R. E. McAlister Cecil L. Stewart H. M. Speece J, Watson Brown James Albert Current Jerve R. Harmon Mrs. Katie Grose Robert F. Putnam J. M. Hager W. M, Lineberger Walter S. Freed lorena Tatum T. O, Hager Carl B, Steve nson Robley D. Stevenson C. B, Thumas R. D. Brotherton lawrence Sloan Willard T. Barnes Fred N. Crawford S. G. Swann S. W. Campbell R. L. Hambright J. R, Hager L. 0. Goodin Dave Gunter Glenn Faust James B, Epperson Mrs. Karl Kirkman J ’. A. Stamper B. H. Staples J. F, Crater is deceased. Mrs. Katie Grose was excused by Doctor's Certificate. Lorena Tatum, C. B, Thomas, Glenn Faust are non-residents. lawrence Sloan and Dave Gunter were not served. i. L, Hambright was excused by statute. the following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: C. C. McLaughlin J. Watson Brown Je Re Powel] James Albert Current R. F. Murdock R, E Jerve R. Harmon McAlister Cecil L, Stewart Robert F. Putnam J. M. Hager H, M. Speece W. M. Lineberger _ captain erat yr nce ‘s IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK JANUARY TERM Tuesday, February 8, 1955 » 1955 J$5885 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Lawrence E. Dishman : vs : Issues Marie R. Dishman : 1. Has the plaintiff heen a resident of the State of Narth Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Did the defendant committ adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes North Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County Lawrence E, Dishman : VS. ‘ Judgment Marie R. Dishman : F This cause comine On to be heard before Honorable Frank M, Armstrong, rt, and being Armstrong, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted to the Jury: 1. Has the plaintirr been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next Preceding the institution of this action? “+ Were the plaintire and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? The Jury having answered al] of Said issues "Yes", It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be for hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Marie R ° Dishman, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintirr by the Clerk, This & day of February, 1955, “rank M, Armetrons— udge Presiding “0 Ree @6 o & xk oe ‘nag Ba Bryant i + SS oRTH CAROLINA g IREDELL COUNTY ¥ a he Superior Armstrong, J~dge Presiding, and a Jury at the January, 1955, Term of the Sup ' d to them p Court of Iredell County, and the Jury having answered the issue submitte e as follows: o1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ( JANUARY TERM. 1955 SECO Te aay February e 1955 ‘ COURT Ae vile CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR IREDELL COUNTY it plaintiff = ia He ISSUE at VS. ) ae Defendant ) a he plaintiff entitled to recover if : ‘ damage, if any, is t ! ® Question: What x | from the defendant? ni | Answer: $450.00. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Willie Click ) i | Plaintiff ) 1 JUDGMENT A vs. 4 ugh Re Bryant ) Defendant ) r FrankM. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, dant.s? What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover as damages from the defen Answer: $150.00. ere av Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaint th interest ind recover of the defendant the sum of Four Hundred Fifty & no/100 wi thereon from this date, together with the costs of this action. This 8th day of February, 1955. Frank M. Armstro - Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding ee RK eK Ke Ke KK KK KK OK KK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 8, 1955 JNo. 5880 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1955. Martha Rhyne Bass Vs ISSUES William M. Bass I Were plaintiff and the defendant married and are now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes, II Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina fora period of six months » immediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes, III Has the Plaintiff, Martha Rhyne Bass lived separate and apart from her husband, the defendant, for a period of two years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes, North Carolina, In the Superior Ceurt Iredell County. January Term 1955 Martha Rhyne Bass Vs JUDGMENT William M, Bass This cause coming on to be heard a nd being heard, at this the January Term of the SuperiorCourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, residing, and a Jury, Submitted to it by the Court, before his Honor Frank M. Armstrong, Judge P and the Jury having answered the issvs in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendam as set out in the Record: It is therefore, Ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrisi! intiff, Martha be and the Same are heretofore existing between the pla William M, Bass, Rhyne Bass, and the defendant ef hereby dissolved, ‘and the plaintiff is grant absolute divorce from the defendant Frank M, Armstrong ———— udge Presiding "*8 60 wees eek kK & & H NORTH CAROLINA | SUPERIOR COURT : SECOND ier. JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 8, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY-FEBRUARY TERM-1955 . 5930 Nos CAROLINA } IREDELL COUNTY ' weaver F. Hinson, Plaintiff § ISSUES --VS-- : Mary &. Hinson, Defendant | d the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband Le oe e , ? © and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart 26 e h other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for mor from eac ’ 9 © than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? me than Answer: Yes a tion? | for more than six months prior to the commencement. of this ac Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY-FEBRUARY TERM-1955 IREDELL COUNTY | E Weaver F, Hinson, Plairmtiff : ' JUDGMENT -VS- Mary E, Hinson, Defendant, i of the This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term | Frank M, Armstrong @ ‘uperior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor Fr s submitted to Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issue as set out in s it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, » the records, ds of matrimony It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bon defendant, Mary | heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Weaver F. Hinson, and the d an absolute &. Hinson, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is grante divores from the cefendant. nk M, A Fra udge res ng ake Ke KK eK Kk OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 8, 1955 JNo. 5939 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR couRT Russell S. Cline Plaintiff ra SUB Ss Montest R. Cy,ine Defendant : vs : . 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint’ Answer. Yes 26 for two years next preceding the commencement ¢ this action? Answer. Yes 3+ Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Careline for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this actior? Answer, Yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TERM Russell S, Cline Plaintiff — : JUDGMENT Montest R, Cline : Defendant : This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the uperior Court and a jury, the issues Submitted to them in favor of the Plaint aS appears in the record; regular term of Iredell § and the jury having answered iff and against the defendant, it 38 » THEREFORE, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of marriif heretofore existing between the ph intiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved and Set aside, and the Plai ntiff is granted an absolute divorce from the Defendant. It is furth °r ordered that the Plaintiff pay the costs of this action Py and wife, as alleged in the Complaint: ‘ae Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each oth: mee /) than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OOF SECOND WEEK -------- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February &, 1955 Pino. 5912 i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT q NORTH CAROLINA JANUARY - FEBRUARY ie TERM = 1 ain b rRepeLL COUNTY | 955 re f Wea Flora Reid, Plaintiff ne ‘t ISSUES a VS. i s Ae uubert Ke Reid, Defendant | We) 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband Answer: Yes 2, Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide° resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY - FEBRUARY TERM - 1955 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY | Plora Reid, Plaintiff | JUDGMENT ———— vs. 4 Hubert K. Reid ! Cpa This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the a Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, 48 set out in the records. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of “‘rimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Flora Reid, and the defendant, Hubert K. Reid, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Frank M ron udge Presiding : xe KK eK Kk ke kK Ke KK OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ~--------- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuaday, February 8, 1955 ‘No . 5904 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR ¢ IREDELL COUNTY OURT JANUARY TERM, 1955 Thelma Wray Thompson Plaintiff vs. ISSUES Rufus Marvin Thompson Defendant 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived Separate and apart from each othe for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes, NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1955 Thelma Wray Thom son Plaintiff ) ) ) vs. JUDGMENT Rufus-Marvin Thompson ) Defendant ) was This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judged holding the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the Plaintiff and aS appears in the record; iy and the Court havinednvestigated to its satisfaction th a plaintiff and the conditions under against the defendant, which she is attempting to raise the child born » and finds that the Plaintiff is a fit ans svitable person and shou! be awarded the sde care, custody to the marriage and control of the infant child, Harold Andrew Thompson. IT IS, THE : REFORE, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of marriag? heretofore existing between the plaintirr and the defendant be, and the same i hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is olute divorce from the defendant, granted an abs [N THE SUPERIOR COURT if SECOND WEEK o------ JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 8, 1955 No. 5903 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | vont CAROLINA ay JANUARY TERM1955 a IREDELL COUNTY | Bula Madrid Cass Cranford Plaintiff ) Tes 08 s v8. | ) | ford ] Ronie Nea? . Defendant ) 1, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the a Complaint? aie Answer: Yes | 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina i for a period of one year or more next preceding the bringing of this action as ] alleged in the Complaint? | Answer: Yes : 3, Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each ay H 5s other for two years next. preceding the bringing of this action as dleged in this f " . na complaint? ay Answer: Yes ita ks 5 a — F IN THE SUPERIOR COURT F a mt NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM 1955 fula Madrid Cass Cranford ) Plaintiff ) vs. ) JUDGMENT Romie Neal Cranford ) a Defendant ) This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor, Frank ". Armstrong, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the January Term of the Superior “ourt of Iredell County, North Carolina; and it appearing to the Court that the ‘efendant has been properly served with process as-provided for by law, and the ‘cllowing issues having heen submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint ? Answer: Yes, 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina f *F @ Period of One year or more next, preceding the bringing of this satien ae ‘lleged in the % Complaint? Answer: Be Yes, ach Nave the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from e ’ is "for two years next preceding the bringing of this action as alleged in th Complaint? Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ ~--~ JANUARY TER M Tuesday, February 8, 1955 : 7 Now, therefore, it is ordered adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff Bula Mag ’ rid Cass Cranford be, and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defends Adan Romie Neal Cranford, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing bety een the plaintiff and the defendant by, and they are hereby, resolved. And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact that there is one minor child of the said marriage, a son, John Neal Cranford + who has been living with his mother, the plaintiff, since the Separation of his parents, and it further appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have custody and control of the said minor child and that the best interests of the said child would be served by being in the custody of his said mother, the plaintiff: It is, therefore, ordered that the plaintiff be, and she is hereby, granted the complete custody and control of the said minor child until further orders of this Court. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This day of February, 1955, Frank M. Armstrong Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding ‘*eeceereceeeneaaRaeRE ER EO & & WNo. 5867 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY, In the Superior Court January Term 1955 Stroy Doughton Speaks, Plaintiff, Vs. i 8883S Wilma Millsaps Speaks, Defendant, { 1. Did the Plaj S saintift, Stroy Doughton Speaks, and the Defendant, Wilma Mills" peaks, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes, 2. Have the Plamiff, Stroy Doughton Speaks Millsaps Speaks, » and the Defendant, Wilma : lived Separate and apart from each other mm ediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes, re 3. for two consecutive ye" Has the Plaintiff, Stroy Dou ehto f the State of North Carolina n Speaks, been a bona fide resident © for six mo of this action? hths immediately preceding the commencement ANSWER Yes, ae ae TARY TERM, 1955 WEEK -<---+---- co Seeder. February,&, 1955 In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. January Term 1955 stroy Doughton Speaks, Plaintiff, — eee ee } ! Vs. ! jilma Millsaps Speaks, ! Defendant. | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor Frank Armstrong, Judge Presding, and a jury, at the January Term, 1955, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues having been submitted to, and answered by the jury, to-wit: 1. Did the Plaintiff, Stroy Doughton Speaks, and the Defendant, Wilma Millsaps Speaks, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes. 2, Have the Plaintiff, Stroy Doughton Speaks, and the Befendant, Wilma Millsaps Speaks, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes. 3, Has the Plaintiff, Stroy Doughton Speaks, been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes, The Court further finds that summons was duly served on the Defendant by '. E, Bebber, Sheriff of Alexander County, North Carolina, on the 2nd day of October, 1954, by delivering personally to the Defendant a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint, IT 1S. THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant be, and they ‘re dissolved, and the Plaintiff, Stroy Doughton Speaks, is granted an absolute divorce from the Defendant, Wilma Millsaps Speaks. Let the cost of this»action be Paid by the Plaintiff, This the 8 dav of February, 1955. Frank M. Armstren udge Presiding eee KKK KK KK KK OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ECOND WEEK -------- ~~ JANUARY TERM, 1 ’ Tuesday, February 8, 1955 = INo. 5805 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Fred E. Woods : vs $ Issues Helen D. Woods : 1. Has theplaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes, 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant Separated, and have they lived separats i} and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this actic! Answer: Yes, North Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County ba Fred E. Woods : vs : Judgment Helen D. Woods : This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding over the February Civil Term Iredell Superior Court, and being heard before said Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted to the Jury: 1. Has the plaintirr been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2. Were the Plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plai ntiff and defendant Separated Separate and apart continuously for two this action? J , and have they lived years next preceding the institution of The Jury having answered all of Said ji Ssues "Yes", It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, $ adjudged and decreed that the boné of matrimony heretofore existing between the Pp ever dissolved, and the plaintirr is defendant, Helen D, Woods » 4nd that the costs of this action be taxed against ™ Plaintiff by the Clerk, hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from th This day of February, 1955, nk M n udge Presiding ** ke & & & & ee ee we He & iyoat# CAROLINA Ince B Ince OR COURT. ECOND Ed esas JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 8, 1955 $SITL IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Y IREDELL COUNT Pp, 5. West Construction Co., Plaintiff vs —— eee Dixon and Christoperh Co., ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED JUDGE PRESIDING: It appearing to the Court that the defendant, by and through its Attorneys, t ap h. Moore, Smith & Pope, of Greensboro, wish to withdraw the defendant's demurrer Smith, Moore, filed in‘this action, and it also appearing to the Court Phe, Oe, SMM, 0 th plaintiff agree to the withdrawal of the demurrer and consent to an extension e ; j March of time for the defendant to file answer or a@her pleadings to and including Marc 7, 1955, it is therefore, | ORDERED. ADJUDGED and DECREED that the defendant's demurrer is hereby dis- . , as nissed, and that. the defendant shall have to and including March 7, 1955 within which to file answer or other pleadings in this action. This 8 day of February, 1955 Frank M, Armstron = e Presiding at the January, 1956 Civil Term, Superior Court of Iredell County. CONSENTED AND AGREED TO: a —— aymer ymer Attorneys for Plaintiff SMITH, MOORE, SMITH & POPE By: M, Hunter tterneys for Defendant ‘eek KK Ke KK KR eK HK KR 61 YNo. 5664 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | SECOND WEEK ------ ---- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 8, 1955 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUP COUNTY OF IREDELL ERIOR COURT Bristol A. Messick, Plaintiff, JUDGMENT W. F. Mackey -and- } q ! -vs- } R. M. Kabrich, | Defendants. THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Frank M. Armstrong, Juige Presiding at the January, 1955 Regular Term of the Superior Court in Iredell County, and it being made to appear to the Court from state- ments of counsel for the plaintiff and the defendants that the parties hereto have agreed to adjust, compromise and settle all matters and things in contro- versy between them, as appears from the pleadings, by the payment by the de- fendants to the plaintiff of the sum of $ 146.57, each defendant to pay in to the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County one-half of the aforesaid amount. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of $146.57 in full, final and con- plete adjustment, compromise and settlement of all matters and things in controversy between the parties as appears from the pleadings, each defendant to be fi . e fully released from al] liability upon the payment of one-half of the afore- Said amount. It is further ordered that each defendant pay one-half of the costs. This the 8 day of February, 1955. Frank M. Armstrong udge Presiding: "Stee e006 b 6 eo oe , . Kab 4 M elity & Guaranty Company, : W. Fe Mackey, ® coun 4. M. Speece IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---------- - JANUARY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, February 8, 1955 Nos 5300 TH CAROLINA spate OF WN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT cOUNTY OF IREDELL rich and United Staes Plaintiffs, ' JUDGMENT { | ! -V8- Defendant. THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard and being heard before Honorable Frank M. b immstrong, Judge Presiling at the January, 1955 Regular Term of the Superior Court ’ | of Iredell County, and it being made to appear to the Court from statements of to settle the matters in controversy between them, as appears from the pleadings E ty the plaintiffs taking a voluntary non-suit and the defendant taking a voluntary non-suit on his courtter-claim. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the plaintiffs be and they are hereby non-suited, with prejudice, and the defendant is hereby non-suited on his counter-claim, with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs pay the costs. This the 8 day of February, 1955 Frank M. Armstrong Judge Presiding eee Ke Kee KK KKK KK KK Bo. 5437 » W. Moore vs foward Deal The following jury was sworn and impanelled: J. R, Powell Cecil L. Stewart James Albert Current Jerve R, Harmon Robert F. Putnam Valter S. Freed Robley D. Stevenson RD, Brotherton Willard T. Barnes P Ted N. Crawford James B. Epperson "rial of this case is continued until Wednesday, February 9, 1955. *his Honorable eee Aes 4 WA . hi sel for the plaintiffs and the defendant that the parties hereto have agreed Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, February 9, 1955 at _IN THE SUPERIOR COURT _ SECOND WEEK ----------. JANUARY TERM, 1955 Wednesday, February 9, 1955 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning February 9, 1955 at 10:00 ofclock A. M. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT REDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM 1955 0. 5864 ) Frank Brunner, Plaintiff ) vs ISSUES ) Minnie McCray Brunner, Defendant, ) 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes, 2. Did the defendant Separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate ay apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes, 3. Has the Plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more tha six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes, NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM 1955 Reckatee one eiterwenss sci Frank Brunner, Plaintiff, JUDGMENT vs Minnie McCray Brunner, Defendant, ) cneercenetittocnenettin bean annem This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Term, 195) Superior Court of Iredell Coun ty before His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, Judge i Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to i in the favor of the Plainitff and against th the record; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrindt! heretofore existing betw fen the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same af hereby dissolved, and th e plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, This the &th day of February, 1955. . " : udge Pres TP OCe + ew Cw. ae ; Jonn Chester Johnson armstrong, ¢ | IPERTOR COURT SOOND THER noone --e= JANUARY TERM, 1955 . Wednesday, February 9, 1955 +5131 A ont CAROLIN TREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY - FEBRUARY TERM 1955 lKay Frances Smith, Pe i by her next Friend, L. G. Plaintiff Se ee ee See JUDGMENT vs. ) Defendant ) This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor Frank M. udge Presiding at this term of Court, and it appearing to the poate that this is an action brought by Kay Frances Smith, a minor, by her Next — L, G, Smith, against John Chester Johnson, alleging certain injuries suffered by he minor plaintiff as the outgrowth of the automobile being driven by the defen- the min ’ : Enh P ant's son, Martin Johnson, overturning on the 26th day of Sqtember, 19543; the 3 th 3 plaintiff minor at that time being a guest passenger in the rear seat of the © sutomobiles And it further appearing to the Court that the palintiff minor, Kay Frances < S Snith, suffered some injuries but mone deing of a sericas nature and no permanen injuries resulting; And it furtheyappearing to the Court that the liability of the dfendant is nd questionable and that the injuries to the plaintiff are not of a serious a eed permanent nature and that the plaintiff and defendant, through counsel, have agr Eight upon @ settlement of all matters and differences between them for the sum of Eig i that | Hundred Sixty-seven and 00/100 ($867.00) Dollars; and the Court further finding the injuries suffered by the plaintiff are not of a serious nature and the» the settlement made is fair and reasonable and for the best interests of the minor plaintiff: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Bight Hundred and Sixty-seven and 00/100 ($867.00) Dollars in full and complete settlement of all injuries and damages suffered by said Plaintiff; That the defendant paid the sum into the office of the Clerk of Superior d Court of Iredell County and that the said Clerk of said Court disbursed the sai 5 Mey as follows; $50.00 to Monroe Adams, Attorney for plaintiff $159.00 to L. G, Smith, Father of minor, and Next Friend of plaintiff Kay — = (to reimburse him fér payment to the Davis Hospital $133.00, $26.00 for — itens expended in this matter) } f the That the balance be retained by the said Clerk for the use and benefits © of this action, : is 9 day of February, 1955, cost Minor Plaintifr as Provided for by law, and that the defendant be taxed eo the ERIOR COURT SECOND a JANUARY TERM . 1955 Wednesday, February 9, 1955 IN THE SUPERTOR GOURT SECOND WEEK ---=-=-~=--- JANUARY TERM. 1956 Wednesday, February 9, 1955 - neko ae eee . #5007 i ie ‘ oS a hh Caaiiie | yorti CAROLINA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ae Adams, Dearman & Winberr E peDBLL COUNTY . Attorney for Plaintiff Ine bs | * gilbert Engineering Company, “nee, : L. G. Smith PLAINTIFF Father and Next Friend of minor plaintifr - JUDGMENT Land, Sowers, & Avery Attorney for defendant leton, trading and doing ' : er oe heaerice Oil Company", SP ee ee ee ee DEFENDANT + Acuna This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Frank | IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT By. armstrong, Judge Presiding at the January Term 1955 of the Superior Court of i ‘Grace Parker, : Iredell County and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel that pee ) all matters of controversy set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the : a — parties, and that the defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff and the plaintiff " i ae Dofealenes has agreed to accept the sum of Six Hundred Eight Dollars and Eleven Cents : This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, iS (HRRats eRe domerest thereon free EE ote oes creer, os | Judge presiding at the January - February Term of the Superior Cout of Iredell of Cate Gaetan 19 ful] aenens aad atiatecnion theceors i County, North Carolina, and being heard upon the motion of the defendants herein | Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the ag for leave to amend Paragraph V of their Further Answer and Counterclaim, | plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Six Hundred Eight Dollars bet for the plaintirf having been notified therer counsel rt * ’ 4 h k. r | the hearing of said motion, and the court being of the opinion that the defen- root SEE Action :-te-be tened: oy Une Sher i] fi dants should be allowed to amend their Further Answer and Counterclaim as set This 6th day of February, 1955, } forth in said motion: 4 prank Poe NOW » THEREFORE, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the defen- Consent: m4 dants b S be, and they hereby are allowed to amend their Further Answer and on fees J Count i nterclaim filed herein, and Particularly Paragraph V thereof, in accordance Worney for Plaintiff with said motion and amendment Grant Bolner adic attached thereto appearing in the file. @ ‘ttorney for Defendant Plaintirr is to have 30 4 ays to reply or otherwise plead. eke KEE HK RK KH a This 7 day of February, 1955, Rae “nat Xe Arnstrons—— udge Presiding ~~ ROR ee hee ce ae This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, February 10, 1955 oat a 10300 O'clock A. M IN THE SUPERTOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---==-~-=JANUARY TERM, 1955 Thursday, February 10, 1955 #S4AZ] NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. January Terml955 JJ, W. Moore, ! Plaintiff, Vs. Howard Deal and Calvert Fire Insurance Company, ! --+-+-+- = a { f i ! Defendants. 1. Was the automobile of the plaintiff, J. W. Moore, damaged by the negligence of the defendant, Howard Deal, as alleged in the amended complaint? ANSWER No. 2. If so, what amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff, J, W. Moore, entitled to recover of the defendant, Howard Deal? ANSWER $ 3+ Was ue Jeep Station Wagon of the defendant, Howard Deal, and his Person, damaged and injured by the negligence of the plaintiff, J. W. Moore, as alleged in the amended answer? ANSWER No. 4. If so, what amount of damages, if any, are the defendants entitled to recover from the Plaintiff, J. w, Moore, ANSWER & y for the Jeep Station Wagon? Tf so, what amount of damages, if any, is the defendant, Howard Deal, entitled to recover from the plaint iff, J. W. Moore, for the injuries to his person? ANSWER $ NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY, JANUARY TERM, 1955- J. W. Moore, VS. JUDGMENT Howard Deal and Calvert Fire Insurance Company, at the regular Janueyt and @ j © Frank M, Armstrong, Judge presiding, ™® ury, ee : ’ and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the record, : Issue No, 1 being and Issue N. ; 0. Court from the issues answered defendants are answered "Non 3 being answered "No". appearing to the by th that neither paa@intiff nor the y the jury th entitled to rec the this action, over anything from 1955, THE SUPERIOR COURT OND Ee eee JANUARY TERM, 1955 i Thursday, February 10, 1955 fendant, Howard Deal, hertofore paid the Court that the de ; It appearing to d under the order made by His f $500.00 in this action an tiff the sum o to the plein Will Pless, Jr., at the August Term, 1953, Iredell Superior Court, Honor, Je ; : ey was to be made in the further orders of the court, and of this mon disposition his : endant Howard Deal, is now entitled to have t sun of $500.00 returned to him. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That the plaintiff, J. W. Moore, return and pay to the defendant, Howard li at , h m of $500.00 hereinabove referred to, the same to be paid within 30 He Deal, the su . ided the defendants have not given notice of appeal to the Supreme Court; days, prov e allowed by law if the defendants or either of them should within the time a 7 however, ds of tice of appeal to the Supreme Court, the $500.00 is to remain in the hands give no the plaintiff for further orders of the court. 2, That the plaintiff, J. W. Moore, recover nothing of the defendant, Deal e in this aciton. 3. That the defendants, Howard Deal and Calvert Fire Insurance Company, re- m cover nothing of the plaintiff in this action. 4. That the plaintiff, J. W. Moore, be taxed with the cost in this action, ert and that there be taxed in the cost the following witness fees for the exp B Witnesses who testified, to-wit: 1, Dr. J. B. Aycock, Statesville, N. C., $20.00. 2. Dr. Wesley C, Palmes, " 7 ON $20.00. $50.00. $50.00. 3. Dr. F, Wayne Lee, Charlotte, ° 4. Dr. J. S. Gaul, Sr., * . This the 10th day of February, 1955. Frank M,. Armst rene udge Presiding cee KR KK AR KK KK RK KK KK KH ‘ons a , ENTERING & LARCENY “ Nee sen of the court is that the fot eee: 7 a confined in the common jail of Iredel oe a ae wn Albert Wilkinson period of aoe eae oh) ee catia ent ,o 7 vis : — ; works Canadeitans This sentence is pees ee cot a riod of FIVE (5) YEARS and the defendan ne Pecet ex Gagetate "ar tne starr att Zo ion Commission an : uaseatioas set out in the probation Te naeet As special conditions of probation the ron ge shall pay a fine of $100.00 and the cone ea on or before the May Term, 1955, Superior Court that he not operate an automobile for a period of 1 two from this date. le fre flit, 1 ‘<< } years hy las MAS, Pe? [POR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---------- JANUARY T Ao Thursday, February 10, se 1955 IN THE SUPERTOR COURT SECOND K --------~--- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Thursday, February 10, 1955 Wo. 2200 | BREAKING, ENTERING LARCENY ae #374 SOLINA i reeme peneme CHORD State Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant ae | a i vs {| the common jail of Iredell County for a period ef fai ay ELL COUNTY Se ee Jerry Morton FOUR (24) MONTHS and assigned to work under the su ists IRED W-19 of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, i" he Matter of the { sentence is suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS ‘and a of Nettie Sharpe s95U8 { the defendant is hereby placed on probation under the deceased ) { supervision of the State Probation Commissbn and its off; a | Subject to the conditions set out in the probation 4 - 1, Is the paper writing propounded as the Last Will and Testament of As special conditiengof probation, the defendant eh : : ! a fine of $100.00 and the costs to be paid on or teint vettie Sharpe Guy dated May 21, 1949, marked Exhibit "A", and every part and { May Term, 1955, Superior Court and that he not operate an ™ ? } automobile for a period & two years from this date, clause thereof, the Last Will and Testament of Nettie Sharpe Guy, deceased? i Answer: Yes. No. 2201 {| BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY State Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant be confined in Leroy Hamlin, Jr. | POUR (2h) MONTHS AND ASSIGNED to woce anber ote ee mlin, Jr. to work under the sy H CAROLINA W-20 of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This & Pes art sentence is saspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS and the defendant is hereby placed on probation under the supervision of the State Probation Commission and its officers, subject to the conditions set out in the probation ! judement. As special conditions of probation, the defendant shall pay a fine of $100.00 and the costs to be paid on or before the May Term, 1955, Superior Court and that he not operate an automobile for a period of two years from this date, Me REDELL COUNTY In the Matter of the Will of ) Nettie Sharpe Guy, deceased ) JUDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Frank M. Armstrong? Judge Presiding, and a jury at the January - February, 1955 Term of the ‘aperior Court of Iredell County, upon a caveat to the will of Nettie Sharpe Guy, ‘Me. 2203 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Bieceased, and the following issue having been submitted to and answered by the jury: Judement of the Court is that the Defendant be confined in M the common ‘ail of Iredell County for a eariod of TWENTY- 1, Is the paper writing propounded as the Last Will and Testament of Nettie wid arker FOUR (24) MONTHS and assigned to work under the supervision Sharpe Guy dated May 24, 1949, marked Exhibit "A", and every part and of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS and the defendant is hereby placed on probation under the Supervision of the State Probation Commission and its officers, subject to the conditions set out in the probation | clause thereof, the Last Will and Testament of Nettie Sharpe Guy, deceased? Answer: Yes. jud NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Last Will and Judgment. As special conditions of 1 probation, the defendant sha Pry tine of $100.00 and the costs to be paid on or befor Pedy Term, 1955, Superbr Court and that he not operate n automobile for a period of two years from this fate. te ps 7F, Y "Ge i) ‘ toys spy i ss P } OU WA. cs of 2 a A 4: /4 + Testament of Nettie Sharpe Guy, deceased is that certain paper-writing heretofore AA AES AS ES NN NE A OS Ee offered for probate and probated in common form in words and figures as recorded in Book of Wills 13, Page 533 in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of iIredel} County; vv IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that B. S. Guy and Ross Clanton, Executors under the p*'¢ will pay to the Attornays for the propounders in this action the sum of Two ‘tundred and fifty and no/100 ($250.00) Dollars, and to the Attorney for the caveator he sum of One Hundred and Fifty and no/100 ($150.00) Dollars and the costs of this Proceeding to be taxed by the Clerk, as a charge against the Estate of Nettie Sharpe Cuy, This 10th day of February, 1955. Te On ~——Judge Presiding Keke Kee Ke KK ee KK OK OK IN THE SUPERTOR COURT SECOND WEEK 2---~s-=- JANUARY TERM, 1955 Thursday, February 10, 1955 ay ‘ $532 taf CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 5767 Robert C. Black, Ind. & as Stockholder,al Vs. Black & Taylor B TREDELL COUNTY Motors Inc. ee ee ae ee ee ee te Da me ON Se Ines soceene~eneantendcabonhwnstonesbesbeccctnny . White, i Thomas He eoiaintiff. INo. 5858 Mary K. DAncy Vs. Provident Life & Accid ent Ins. Co, JUDGMENT INo. 5856 L. 0. Pierce Vs. T. M. Gladden on ) ~~ Continued, Me verbert D. Wooten and ) ) ve e Wooten g Joye Defendants ° No. 5743 Vernon Lee Saunders Vs. Betty Hall Saunders C ont inued, ‘No. 5#51 Mary Alexander Parker Vs. Ernest Lee Parker w= Continues, Wooten and Joyce Wooten, the defendants in the above entitled : We, Herbert D. Continue, ies action, 40 hereby confess judgment in favor of Thomas H. White the plaintiff herein, INo. 5875 Marie Skillman Paul Vs. Richard James Paul, Jr. (No. plex We or re ea S« r lees VS. Mar 1e +e Dishman Continued f T Hundred hiry a Nor=5326-—Tremas-— A White—Ve;-Herbert—Dy-Weeten-t 10 Woot ’ oom iNo. 5609 OR anneal, Ss utomobile resulting from a collision with the automobile of the defendants, and & lie ° UO & -4 iS | V rrin Continued, : No. 5696 . lo. 5696 H. E. Meadows Vs. Landreth I. Pruitt of judgment therefor. Continued, George Pinknev Martin Vs. John BAnks Shoemaker, Cent ional /s/ Herbert D. Wooten Wo. 5746 m Accepted: ae eA Q - , /s/fred_ Chamblee nec ‘ - a o “ittorney for Plaintiff /s/ Joyce Wooten s j > user<. Vaeaadtaw ~ } Sworn tO and subscribed before me, m this 5th day of February, 1955. _/s/__ Nancy King Pearson Notary Public f ty commission expires: 9-22-56 Upon the foregoing confession of judgment, it is now ordered, adjudged, and decreed thet the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of Two Hundred p Thirty-six and 44/100 ($236.44) Dollars, with interest thcrton from the 7th day of February, 1955, together with the costs in the sum of three dollars. This 7 day of February, 1955. C. G. Smith Glerk of the Superior Court kk KR OR OK KR eK KR HK KR 74 A#5954 North Carolina | In the $ Iredell County | uperior ¢ Before the Clerk, R. & J. Discount Company , Plaintiff os JUDGMENT OF NON-syrr Rankin Robinson Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Tredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statements of Scott, Collier & Nash, Attorneys for the Plaintiff that ’ the matters and things in conteversy have been settled between the parties, an ’ that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the full amount of the note sued on in this action plus the costs paid by the plaintiff: and that the plaintiff has elected to take a voluntary non-suit in its action: i 28, THEREFORE, Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be ang it is hereby non-suited this 7th day of February, 1955, fa/ _C, G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Consented to: R & J Discount Company hi Scott, Collier & Nash, Attorneys + By M. L. Nash i Sot Se te baeae * + ii “#5913 ; if NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a Sam ~Wi i epee Implement Company, Plaintiff, j vs, 4 JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Sam Tomlin, | t to take a non-suit in this action: iT Is, THEREFORE, ORDERED , ADJUDGED Suited and be taxed ee with the costs, Filed and entered in the offic REED that the Plaintiff be nor © of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell 8, 1955, County at Statesville this January 2 Ss G Sm i ‘ oaeenee - ve Omith, Ulerk of Super Court of Iredell County, 45887 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 2 that this action was instituted in the Superior Court of Iredell County, ae } Court, S Chevrolet One-half Ton Pickup Truck, which was damaged by the collision described (ont CAROLINA BEFORE THE CLERK ie IREDELL COUNTY | rhe | . P. Van Hoye |) neire a JUDGMENT | vSe d y, He Longest an j i : due i girs. Be Me Par Defendants. | his cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable i This c i : ith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the : Bc, G, Smith, 3 North Carolina, on November 10, 19543 that thereafter the Plaintiff filed a duly 7 verified Complaint, which was served on the Defendants in apt time; that there- ' after extensions of time have been entered and the Defendants now have ean ; ‘ including March 21, 1955 in which to file an answer, demurrer or to otherwise Ae plead; that it further appearing to the Court, from the statements of Counsel for all the parties, that a settlement has been reached regarding all the matters : and things alleged in the Complaint; that under the terms of the settlement, the aot Plaintiff is to have and receive of the Defendants the sum of Eighty-Six Dollars and Twenty Cents ($86.20), which is the total cost of the repairs for his 1950 and alleged in the Compaint filed herein; that it further appearing to the Court od: hi that the Plaintiff now desires to accept the settlement upon the payment to him take of Eighty-Six Dollars and Twenty Cents ($86.20/ and desires, thereafter to : the a non-suit; that, likewise, the Defendants desire to to pay the Plaintiff for 5 . ties j damage to his truck andoonsent to the Plaintiff taking a non-suit; that all par agree and consent that this judgment shall operate as a complete accord and satisfaction barring both the Plamtiff and the Defendants from maintaining any further action based upon the facts alleged in the Complaint. NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, AD JUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the Plaintiff's cause of action against the Defendants be, and it is hereby non-suited and dismissed; that the Plaintiff is forever barred from instituting or maintaining a future action based upon the facts alleged in his Complaint in this cause, laint ¢. That by the payment to the Plaintiff of the damages alleged in the Comp , ‘nd by consenting to this judgment herein, the Defendants and each of them, are in forever barred from instituting or maintaining a future action based upon, or growing out of, the Collision between the truck belonging to the Plaintiff and the 1951 t Plymouth automobile owned by the Defendant, H. H. Longest and driven by the Defendant, ; e. Mrs, E. M, Pardue, as set forth in the Plaintiff's Complaint filed in this caus 3. That the Defendants be taxed with the cost. Signed, entered and filed in the office of the Clerk of the in Statesville, North Carolina on February 16, 1955, C, G, Sm Consented to: Adams, Dearman & Winberry Attorneys for Plaintiff Teague & Johnson By C. Woodrow Tearue Attorneys for Defendants eueerkEK eee RK ee ek ee ee & 45870 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Rockingham Agricultural Exposition, Inc. Plaintiff vs. JUDGMENT ae Ross Manning Shows, Inc. Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard befecre the Honorable (irl G. Smith, Clerk of Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing that all the matters in controversy between the Parties, arising upon the pleadings, have been settled, compromised, and adjusted, the plaintiff having agreed to submit to a voluntarv nonsuit as to his claim P » and the defendant having agreed to sub- a mit to a dismissal of his counterclaim: Now, therefore, by consent, it ® ordered, adjudged, and decreed: That th Plaintiff's cause of action against the defendant be > * » and the same is hereby, nonsuited and dismissed: that the defendant "Ss counterclaim against the plainti!! be » and the same is hereby nons uited and dismissed; that the costs of this actit be taxed against the Plaintiff, This 17 day of February, 1955, Cot Smith erk of Superior Consented to: Rockingham Agriculture Exposition ~ By H. M, Plaintit? Boyce G Gibson, J . . r. Attorney for Plenty Ross Mannin Shows, In . Prick Manni MOEN i oo 5, Land, Sowers 7 & Avery I - A r epee i “torney for Defen ant — oa eek ey xe ee ® eke we ke & pte ee Superior Cou, 15671 terri CAROLINA ty Fair, Inc. — Praintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Greenville JUDGMENT VS. Inc. and b Manning Shows, “ei Manning, Individual " Defendants a i ee eee See Sect ee Manel is cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Carl tf en of Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing that all the a in controversy between the parties, arising upon the pleadings, have been ; settled, compromised, and adjusted, the plaintiff having agreed to submit ; a voluntary nonsuit as to his claim, and the defendant having agreed to submit to a BD isni his counterclaim: ae by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed: That the m plaintiff's cause of action against the defendant be, and the same is hereby, , 7 nonsuited and dismissed; that the defendant's counterclaim against the plaintiff iD be, and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that the costs of this action Bbe taxed against the plaintiff. This 17 day of February, 1955. C. G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court me Consented to: Greenville County Fair, Ine. | By a. ~ Plaintiff? Boyce G, Gibson, Jr, _ Attorney for Plaintiff BH Ross Manning Shows, Inc. By . Ross Manning Shows, Inc. # —___Ross Manning Defendants @ land, Sowers & Avery Isaac T, Avery, Jr, shasta y Attorneys for efendants, eR RK eR KK eR KK kK KK OK * a ees Ba A pM a Re eee ais a “#5685 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR come fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $275.90 dollars with interest af IREDELL COUNTY ie poney cok lacus's He nereon from the 3lst day of October : | y : e ia i Mary Crow Stallings, * , : ae ce Plaintiff,* Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff \ : the sum of $275.90 dollars, with interest thereon # vs * JUDGMENT have and recover of the defendant $275 . . o aatasuee be Bee on the 3st day of October, 1953, and the costs of this action. : e ° - —— 2 7 : r f v* Defendant, This 4 day of. March, 1955. : This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior : C. Ge Smith mt Clerk of the Superior Court. 24 Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court fron t ak KR KK KK KR KR KK OK K Statement of Paul R. Ervin and W. R. Battley, Attorneys for the plaintiff, thet all matters and things arising in this action have been compromised and Settled ho PE AROLINA 1 ; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT between the parties and that the plaintiff desires to take a nonsuits Me TREDELL COUNTY It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be and Robert C. Black, individugldy, . i me is isd : kholder, on beha i the same is hereby nonsuited and the defendant is hereby taxed with the costs, " ant 0 Pe creditors who RECEIVER'S INVENTORY ; This the 26th r of Feb , nay come in and join him in this say of FeUrnerys see Be proceeding against Black and = f Ene. C. G. Smith Taylor Motors f Clerk of Superior Court T0 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY, NQRTH CAROLINA: ee B isent af: : fe our ce" Pursuant to a judgment in the above-captioned matter entered on the 5th day Mary Crow Stallings Mary Crow Stallings, Plantitf mo’ May, 1954, your Receiver respectfully shows unto the Court the following a Paul R. Ervin and W. R. Battlev Finventory of all the assets of the corporation according to his best knowledge and ’ ‘ \\ By: oR Becatan grelief and from the information now in hand; a Attorneys fr Plaintiff 1 | SASH _ON_HAND a eR RK RK RK Ke ke ok oe ke m°110.72 on deposit with the Peoples Loan and Savings Bgnk, Statesville, North i v#59L2 Carolina. i NORTH CAROLINA ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a iene oe ; ies 5 epairs . Gl i +} : iv. Apt, E220 ascock Distributing Company, Inc. ) “ of Indiana ee ‘10omington, Inc Plaintiff ) ’ ° vs. J. Watt Alexander Insurance 89.00 : ) JUDGMENT BYarmony, N. C, ave Brown T/A D , \ dees ave Brown Heating ) Ammons Radio 60.00 By ammons *Sutdios i 4 Defendant ’ * Broad St, City ; Bk DM This caus ‘ otors 10.41 Cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, C. G. smith, Clere (Clely Brendel) Parts of the Superior ¢ ‘’0 Carolina Motor C ror TOUet OS Teens County, upon motion by the plaintiff for “ae — 4 judgment against the defendant by default final: "ill Baile ; / Repairs 22.01 And it a Co L. By Bailey 8 i Ppearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and 109 Lincoln Ave City Summons issued i | , t ies n this action on the 17th day of January,1955. Mereetker C4 Note 22.00 t further appea - City ier , pearing to the Court that said summons together with ¢ 1. Ry Bat Py Of said complaint were 5 Sherw piey Battery & Repairs 21.83 aie erved on the defendant on the 20th day of January) Pod Lane City . ” . Mrg E W ‘ate Ws Boove And it further appearin 523 &, Sharpe St. City Repairs 14.33 pleading ccs Z to the court that no answer, demurrer, or Floyd Bowl fen filed by the defendant and fil | vo 4, Roy Beads perere i Pleadings has been granted an no extension of time to 2 8. Green City d tha j has expired; t the time within which pleadings may : ; i ae oee = pies of Tae casi . eee ro See a T. E. Bruce (correct address unknown) Hugh R. Bryant (Address unknown) T. N. Cashion Route 4 City Mrs. J. H. Chapman (Address unknown) J. H. Clifford 431 Armfield St. City Ed Coles Salisbury Rd Citv (Public Ser. Co.) B. H. Combs Loray, N. C. L. C. Crane Gen. Del. Wallace, N.C, Crown Chair & Lounge City Custom Chair Co, Shelton Ave, City Asilee Daniels c/o Staley Redmond Rt 2 City Henry Deal Old Mountain ha, City H. L. Dishman (for Billy) 1209 Pearl St, City Bruce & Leona Gaither Hamptonville, N. ¢c, Bruce Gaither Hamptonville, R. Gy are. LL. 6, Gibson NX N. Center St, City H. P. Grier Davie Ave, City V. A. Hager William B, Hager Route 2 City os D. Hendren C/O Vance MeL City ean Sales Co, Re E. Hewitt Boulevard St, City W. D. Holland Davie Ave, City Hollingswo City Sworth Motors Miss Emilie Horr4 inet 6 W. Sharpe St, Blas Charles Horton 1014 £, Broad St. City Repairs Paint job Repairs Repairs Accessories Repairs Repairs Repairs Repairs Repairs Repairs "53 Plate Repairs Paint Job Repairs Note (che'd back) Repairs Tow bill owed by Ins. Co. Repairs (to be paid by Note for purchase of car Repairs Parts and etc. Parts and so forth Repairs Repairs Parts Repairs Accessories & Repairs 49,37 12,57 99,96 4.00 118,69 32.09 1,09 111.71 52.11 25,41 50.00 17,62 30,00 81,82 25.00 18,00 70,00 62.88 51.79 67446 96.23 spton . V Howard donee A Cowles Ste City Mcutnans, Ne ms me 5, Levan mi, center St. City in Little Bos Clay St. City i arlie Loyd eT steers Point, N. Ce ] hert Ce McCoy . b7 Brevard St. City Berican Automobile Ass'n Miuch D. McCracken) artford, Conn. m™ J, Finance Co. ity rarles Madison i/o Statesville Brick Co. Mrs, Catherine Mallory avie Ave, City avid Leroy Mayberry raley St. City B.D. Miller lalnut St. City scar Mills ills Electric Shop ity ». A, Misenheimer ount Ulla, N. C, scar Morrison at. § Box 359A Pity loyte M, Morrison toute 6 City i. Morrison, Jr. 0”. H. Morrison. § ‘i NS Kelly St. City -l. Nixon, Jr. & S - ’ * Te pe Ne Race St, vy iM, Phelps RIA 16 Fifth St. Ext. City Me Pierce Oute 4 City Marl M, Pope Salisbury Rd, City irs, 2» i yehine Reid “oresville N. c cP Shoan ‘Broad st. city » Smith e8ville ° N, C. Tires, repairs, etc. 183.89 Repairs 14.66 Repairs, ane Repairs 131.68 Bal. on note 2.00 1 Repairs 53.12 | Repairs 3.93 he Tow bill &.00 Tow bill 2.00 Tow bill 5.00 Uncollected Ins. claims 26.91 Repairs 12.42 Bal. insurance claim 50.00 Repairs MF Repairs (see W. I. Ward) 43.76 Bal. ins. repair 43 00 Repairs aoe Repairs ae ‘ 8. Repairs Wade Repairs Bae Int. on note am Accessories & Repairs 52.33 00 Repairs 10 Repairs 8.79 -00 Repairs ? G. G. Spann Box 45 Troutmans, N. C. Mrs. Mary Speaks 211 W. Broad St. City Statesville Bae Co, Walter Miller City Statesville Plumbing & Heating City Mrs. W. F. Tavlor 632 Hiehland Ave, City Mrs. Sam C. Troutman, Sr 608 Monroe St. City Harvey Wallace Goldsboro Ave, City Louis Wellman Route 1 City Lewis Weston Route 2 City Mr. ? Whitlow Motors Ins. Corp. Winston-Salem, N.C Yeo Ue Charles Williams Rt. 7 Barkley Rd, City Mrs. L. D. Williams or R. E. Lowrance (Address unknown ) Mrs. Ruby E, = illiams Cleveland, N. Cc. Mrs. J. D. Wolfe Scotts, N.C, H. H. Yount N. Center ot; City OFFIC Studebaker Neon Sien Display Stands (assorted Sizes) Display equipmen ~ es) ee crather covered sofas vNairs (assorted sj Tables (old) wren eee) Desks filing cabinet Poke oi S (metal) ] large, Book Shelf (1 shelves) Parts Bins (Me : , 1 ta Parts Bins ( 2» with drawers Woode i : Parts Bins (Sma T dresce Sivider we ~ WRwWOnN PRE wWN-EN ww S-h tube lights ‘1 tube ldgnte 1-2 tube light ) Desk lamp with Shade @ t, Note Repairs Repairs & Note Repairs Repairs Repairs Note chag'd hack Repairs Repairs Tow bill (Ins. Co.) Repairs Repairs to Mrs. Williams car damaged by Lowrance Bal. insurance claim Heater for 1952 Stude Repairs TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FURNITURE AND FIXTURES (pictures, banners 3 small, & dividers s) Wooden parts col eee type-metal) Slorescent light fieecerawers & shelves) : 0,00 1 333.29 8.17 25.75 2l,,89 20.93 3.06 10,00 15.00 130.20 8,88 50.00 63.27 54.34 $3,197.50 25.00 70,00 75.00 ESTIMATED. VALUE A $100.00 200.00 . 3,00 100.00 25.00 25.00 5.00 £90.00 100.00 20.00 100.00 100.00 on me ee Pr DY FY PO Or YR row Dre gpot lights National ca Adding machines ~- ) ters rate water coolers (one new) Oil eT wt a ster Chec mae billing machine (WIZ) Complete Irter-Com. system seister (late type) ia 1 electric - 1 crank Studebaker parts price book & stand with catalogs complete Bieevene 30 we Pencil sharpene wire filing baskets Metal waste paper baskets Leather blotter pads Wall mirror Clothes — ; Venetian inds Ash trays (3 stand type-5 small) debaker bookkeeping supplies, other uae supplies, etc. (all office supplies) Tani hine aping mach! TOTAL $2,092.50 SHOP EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES ITEM Ww ee ROH RRR eRe eee Oe eee re ee ee he ee Metal (upright) tool cabinet Metal (uprieht) service mgr. desk (new) Lynn Shop benches (metal) Automatic Transmission jack l-ton Chain hoists Weaver twin-post lift Kent-Moore single-post lift 25-lb. grease gun (air) 100-lb. grease gun (air) 2-ton RV hydraulic jack 10-ton Weaver hydraulic jack ld-ton Walker jack (hydraulic) l-ton Walker hydraulic jack ld-ton RV jack (hydraulic) Bench press Bench vises Bench grinder Electric batter charger Anti-freeze tester Oil leak tester Valve-seat grinder and attachments (Hall) Armature tester Electric soldering iron Champion “park-plug tester & cleaner | Valve fac ing machine King Electric-Tach ing Gas Analyzer King Motor Analyzer bees Wheel balance machine w/weight cabinet ranbee front-end machine (portable) peeree brake rivet machine with motor ortable air tank secant air hose with fittings sridebaker Special tools - 1946 to 1954 models udebaker special tools - Automatic transmission et of taps & dies HP Drilj ‘ Drill t. chain 40 ft. water hose . ft. air hose tery cell tester oor cree Rubber=tired” for mechanics ed f ter stands reight truck Slay Head Lubrication Stand Wil oe hee Overhaul Stand, complete ery Charge ta-fast fender ‘onaee cee ee brake fluid dispenser * Sledge hammer ‘tery straps aad Stools —* hand fire extinguisher 4.00 250.00 220.00 50.00 50.00 10.00 15.00 10.00 10.00 5.00 250 ~50 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 10.00 2.50 3.00 20.00 8.00 50.00 15.00 200.00 25.00 5.00 50.00 25.200 75.00 25.00 1.50 5.00 10.00 12.00 10.00 6.00 «50 3.90 30.00 5.00 ~ 50 15.00 5.00 5.00 8.00 100.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 2.50 5.00 300.00 50.00 2.50 15.00 2.00 1.00 ee oe ee 33388888 24 gal. fire extinguishers (foam) 55 gal. drums 30 gal. drum 25 lb. cans graphite spring crease + can 25 lbs. . . ” lbs. Wheel bearing grease lbs. Gear lube gal. Hypoid Transmission grease lbs. Misc. oil and grease Coal Stoves Shop brooms Misc. water & coal buckets & ft. 3 inch iron post 12 ft: 3" " " 14 inch chain 183 feet pilons entrance signs with cross bar s (for used car lot fence) ( " light posts & chain) Body Shop Equipment and Supplies — BHO NH ERR HBR RHP HE BRP HEHE DE HH 10 1/2 box assort QUAN, 5 HP Brunner Air Compressor - New Gas Welding unit - tanks, welding rods & cart Portable hot water heater Banks paint guns Air regulator 75 ft. paint gun hose Air sander Porter power unit with all a 7" Sioux Special Sander = Black and Decker Sander Weaver Head-lamp tester Carbide welder with truck 25 ft. Drop cords - complete Scotch Apron taper stand ce - complete “xnaust fan for pant h t Set Body & Door Soaks as rr. Drip mold Pliers Bumper tool Set - Pullin Body files Sand Paper - all types Gal. paint thinner Speed-flo paint mixer Paint heater lbs. Body lead lbs. rags gauges, tips, ttachments — attachment for Porter Power unit ed door lock Springs TOTAL SHOP EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES PARTS AND ACCESSORIES Pr NUMBER NAME AMT , QUAN NUMBER 1 122825 Bearin L 1a9050 nae” 7 ; sbeaes \ 130986 Cup “16 | saat ; : 26 Grommet OL 16 ataes : 40706 Bearing 49 seuaee 8 168011 Gasket 10 6 sheen é 170045 Pin 2.16 2 1gkeBe g Hyoous Pin 16k oa3iy 1 171498 ce ei i 191373 20 wie oan arn ocd 40 171500 pi> rire 4 194401 ug 30 171502 Ferrule “a. ; 19405 : ioibe? Spring "38 : 12bb12 : teense Retainer -30 ; renee é 172622 Gasket “16 5 Ngbbok “a tht ht Bushing -4.0 ; loneee ; . 259 Bushing 3.12 : ianeae “ oeeelt Cover -92 e 194570 + lashes Retainer 36 ? 194376 : 3 539 Washer "a7 . 194658 +4 tase Bushing -50 “e 194706 3640 Gasket .60 i soceis ‘ 94841 —~— $2,059.00 NAME Wheel Knob Bearing Bushing Bearing Washer Cap Bushing - Washer Bushing Clip Shim Gasket Knuckle Knuckle Retainer Hub Spring Cable Gasket Lever Shaft Key 25.00 Yer — nm ° rey OWMONnornNooo S38 8888888888 QUAN. gun es RWW DH EWE IAS OH _ vr ee SO 0 & FN OHO DWN NE’ FF ROW W ED BE WUNH NH AWN DD DY pene he WY PO AD FS Wwe ree Pe - BI wD NUMBER 183904 181.478 185180 185873 185892 187003 187161 197253 187167 18781 188015 188064 188318 188626 188628 189113 189112 189316 189327 189592 189604 189813 189863 190301 190893 190895 190896 190897 190907 190919 191713 192720 191723 19172h 191725 191766 191827 191912 192247 192307 1921.80 1921.8, 1021.87 192576 192825 192826 193019 193122 196701 196711 196715 196726 196859 196880 196882 196891 196897 196911 196922 196937 196941 19691,7X1 197027 - 197039 197083 197096 197161 197189 197190 197192 197216 19721,9 197252 197259 197260 197263 197267 197269 NAME Cup Screw Spring Bearing Bearing Gasket Hose Bearing Point Belt Gasket Adaptor Ring Armature Bendix Rotor Cover Slinger Plate Spacer Bushing Cap Bumper Pin Gear Ring Ring Ring Fork Ring Clamp Clamp Shim Shim Shim Pipe Support Distributor Plate Pipe Coil Switch Link Core Shaft Cable Retainer Gear Cable vVlip Cable Rod Bearing Gace Spdmtr Rad. Gauge Belt Gasket Cable Pinion Pedal Knob Leaf Washer Spring Relay Shackle Shackle. Lever Washer Shaft Fork Hub Hub Gear Shaft Seal AMT. 1.74 05k -60 15.73 9.80 3.06 052 5-79 76 15.00 05k 045 02h 6.83 3.63 3.63 ~62 8h 56 042 1.00 075 18 9.10 63 236 236. 2.66 236 -20 20 2k 18 1.93 ~20 745 68 11.70 16.00 4.08 7.92 Rink 5252 1.59 4.05 19.52 1.42 03h 3.34 1.80 1.50 1.54 7.67 2.21 1.67 88 «03 1.23 3.15 1.50 3.68 +39 2.38 2.17 1.04 222 1.30 «31 21.87 21.87 2.18 5.95 495 QUAN WOOO we PW HOH RH eH WH OWE PHO HERR EH WNHEFYETEEKHMOPEFNNNKFONNDBOKRF HE NNMWMKHNONHYNANDHNE OWDHKNNUNUINUIN BHO NUMBER 194,843 19L8LA 194845 194816 19L89L 195117 195123 195157 195211 195268 195278 195133 195460 195502 195528 195669 1957hL 19577h 195897 195911 195913 195922 195921, 195935 196110 196143 196151 196183 19618L 196185 196186 19€L04 1961.05 196414 196500 196516 196558 196571 19657h 196576 196578 196580 196623 196638 196655 196661 196663 196673 198973 198990 199085 199105 199116 199159 199177 199235 199219 199251 199313 199325 auats 1993L2 199385 199397 199432 199434 199435 199438 199447 199477 1991.80 199481 199533 199548 199551 199552 199633 19965h 199660 NAME Shim Shim Shim Shim Cap Case Rod Cap Wasner Pin Link Pipe Plate Pinion Flange Pin Spring Switch Pin Plug Cable Pedal Pedal Fork & Lever Cap Gear Seal Seal Plate Ring Shaft Plate Plate Gasket Slide Cover Cup Yoke Plate Bolt Clip Bushing Bracket Bumper Valve Therm. Screen Cup Fork Plate Spring Cable Pipe Link Retainer Cyl Shaft Poppet Yoke Bracket Bracket Bracket Washer Knuckle Rod Rod, * Spring Plug Pipe Rod Rod Rod Core Plate Hose Hose Rod Pump Member AMT. 2.09 2.09 46.98 -10 +96 1.38 16.11 1.68 #~e MM MONYNWWWOWND NDNKMYPNLEKYNDNE a £ eM EE HH PRR HH OOHNNUNWWNNEP EP HEPWHHPEN PEE NEP EEN ROODMHEE EH NUMBER 197270 197275 197276 197288 197303 197305 197376 197385 197389 197417 1971.70 197570 197592 197650 197454 197655 197731, 197735 197714 199719 197801 197830 197841 197880 197902 197921 198008 198071, 1980764 198077 198078 198079 198123 198180 198195 198330 198526 198579 198814 1988864 198947 198970 198972 276536X1 276687 276688 276898 27881L 278815 278938 27891,1X}] 27 RORF 280789 280821 281082 222035 282172 282173 282675 283170 281,033 284172 284,187 281.516 281,517 281,521 2814525 284601, 281,605 281,462 2814812 281,845 284,931 281,975wWP 281,996 NAME Baffle Bearing Bearing Gear Housing Sleeve Gear Washer Gasket Pin Gear Shaft Washer Arm Bushing Pin Arm Arm Yoke Yoke Arm Piston Shaft Lever Rod Bracket Bracket Arm Bushing Shaft Washer Washer Arm Rod Care Harness Cyl. Rod Sha ft Shaft Gear Plate Shoe Mirror Lamp Lens Cylinder Driver Driver Handle Handle Bumper Washer Washer Knob Handle Lens Lens Knob Lens Lens AMT. 12 16.40 10.68 49.20 8.69 5-10 61.54 Le .17 3.00 045 4.17 4.17 3.08 3.08 3870 11.88 11.90 1. .70 09k De 00 3.12 1.68 1.39 1.20 1.20 1.24 QUAN. ny bw MOWOARHE HH HH HHH BH HY HW PW dH HEE eH HO HOH RPAIOFP NAN ROM MRM RRND DH HHH H HH OHM HHH RW EPH HOOKER HOLS nO NUMBER NAME 199759 =Rod 258378 Lock 265166 Lock 265178 Lock 266180 Shim 266181 Shim 266937 W/strip 268440 Clamp 269818 Screw 269909W Door 270164 Lock 271214 Lens 271215 Cover 271276 Lamp 271277 Lamp 271278 Body 271279 Body 271282 Lens 271283 Lens 271245 Clip 271729 Control 271959 Handle 272078 Grommet 272289 Grille 272420 Mde 272522 Body 272560 Grille 272615 Grille 27327, Milde 273278 Lamp 273279 Lamp 273378 Rim 273537 Lens 2735h2 Door 273627 Tokle 273671 Lever 274215 Handle 2741426 Channel 274427 Channel 274438 Stud 274439 Washer 274852 Apron 274897 Hook 287890 Apron 287982X1 Knob 288211 +-Handle 287608 Gasket 288239 Handle 288588 Pivot 288657 ~=Plate 288658 Plate 288701 Milde 288769 Hood 288777 Splashguara 288236 Emblem 288952 Core 288968 Switch 289044 Ornament 289138 Clip 289128 Fender 2892146 Breaker 289293 Control 289355 Link 289501 Hood, 289520 Fender 289570 Air Defl 289638 W/Strip 289760P Rim 289791 Reg 289792 Reg 289793 Reg 2897964 Reg 289798 Reg 289799 Reg 289864 Bumper 289872 Handle . SS a ee ee ae MRO J PD OWN WW OWA WD . so So ook ee QUAN. RR RE OW HR RHE OH DE RP RRR ERNE Ree Pe nm HOO OE OY ORO DDO AID Ree Re es SS OR he he NUMBER 285006 285007 285181 285196 285197 225248 2853L6P 285139 285L85 2855h6 285623 285646 285850 225851 28585LX1 285913 286105 286107W 286133 2861L4 226145 286226 284390 286391 286415 286575 226609 286660 2864642 286663 286718 28601), 287029 287078 287079 2871.98 28752), 287525 287528 287780 287781 293581 293662 293663 293665 293687 , 293748 293778X 293798 293828 293830 293831 29391] 296075P 29631,3WP 296391 296393P 2961.03 2961,07W 296488 2961.89 296601X1 2961.50 2965146 29679), 297011 297379 297726V 297771, 297880 2981.18 2981,1,9 298532 298533 298961, NAME Mldg Mldg Gasket W/Seal Lens Mlidg Housing ' Lens Reg Clip Ash Tray Seal Mldg Mid¢ Mirror Rim Ret. Plate Link Splashguard Splashguard Emblem Pilot Handle Handle Clip Midg. Stud Reg Reg Reg Reg Plate Recd ver Tray Guide Lock Apron Apron Bumper Panel Panel Fender Motor Clip Driver Control Gasket Rim Clip Lock Lock Lock Cable Rim Name Plate Emblem Insert Pro Emb em Brace Brace Mat Bumper Ret Mldg Lock Hinge Brace Emblem Gasket Ret Brace Brace Brackett Bracket Gasket AMT. 1.65 1.65 -20 229 3.28 62 1.12 1.54 -07 46 .28 18.84 7.80 1.39 1.54 1.77 10. Lh 10.44 221 21 012 12 063 QUAN. PON PNP WOE HEN EPP E WBE HW RHEIN EP ERE NEP EN BEEP ENP PEP HEE ENE NN HENNE = PUARHHHREN FP HEHE ERP RP RRUNE NUMBER 290121 290157 290158 290159 290160 290161 290208XI 290208XK2 2901.20 2904.21 290422 290423 2901.88 290535 2905L4 290545 290578P 290595 290632 290633 290654 290722 291039X2 291370 291371 291189 291511 291595 291601 291626 291884 291885 292125 292530 293027 293170X1 293210 293230 293233W 293336X2 293338 293375 513292 513302 513306 513400 513405 513502 51350L 513505 513545 5135hE 513547 513590 513638 513653 513655 513776 513939 514163 514411 51LLLY 514577 514578 514634 514669 514675X8 514711 514019 51532k 515196 515378 515379 515731 516015 516189 516349 516350 NAME Est Drive Drive Drive Drive Drive Drive Control Panel Panel Grille Grille Air Defl Ornament Support Support Midg Grille Support Support Ornament Lock Control Splashguard Splashguard Spacer Hinge Door Door Lock Kit Shield Shield Plate Hood Midg Knob Frame Panel Grille Mat Gasket Cable Switch Rod End Lever Bearing Arm Shaft Bushing Ammeter Gauge Gauge Shaft Cage Point Set Condenser Button Lever Rotor Brg. Yoke Gear Cap Hub Cap Plate Button Emblem Cushion Rod Switch Pump Bearing Cam Distributer Case Point Bearing Bearing AMT. 1.63 2.70 1.53 1.53 1.80 1.80 4.32 2.16 ~40 «40 4.35 4.35 2.01 5237 9.88 4.20 1.34 1,656 5437 oh5 7.50 iy 26 49.98 1.14 495 5.28 > Hee eH EHD DOD HHH HW NE PWN HHH W AHO now MNNNKMNWNHKFPR HRN NNRPWONNHPUUINUE WwW HY OWw PD He NUMBER 299018 300960 300963 300965 30L746 3047h7 510193 510278 510550 51262 512197 512499 512632 512714 512752 512778 512813XI 512817 612981 512085 512086 512988 5129890 512900 512992 512997 512998 513002 513003 513015 513019 513020 513021 513022 513146 513148 513160 513255 513260 519110 519121.Xx1 519145 519117 519157 519238 519245 519261 519291 519293 519152 519483 519623 519628 519633 519634 519776 519783 519785 519795 519796 519797 519818 519819 919829 519814 519872 519876 519877 520016 520017 520018 520052 520110 520111 520112 NAME AMT. Midg 2.31 Lens 2.16 Rim 3.54 Ret e31 Gasket, 226 Cup 5.00 Gasket col Spring 9, Post & Worm 6,17 Housing 5.99 Bolt 1.26 Bolt 1.65 Washer Ok Bearing 4.20 Switch 2.76 Cable T51 Lever pO | Pinion 564 Shaft 18.96 Shaft 5.95 Roller -50 Ring ok? Gear 4.36 Shaft ad Shaft 057 Lock Plate .OR Rod 4.36 Shaft 19.18 Gear 8.18 Gear 322k, Plate 7 AD Hub & Cap 4.18 Hub & Drum 8.80 Cable 3.2L Shaft 19.80 Lever rx Bell Crank 3.45 Knob 075 Switch 1.36 Shackle Kit 4.55 Switch 1.50 Member 2.51, Ape 2.31 Housing 5.0! Bearing 11.58 Bearing 4.20 Pin 3.27 Gasket .03 Bracket 2.06 Bushing 236 Knuckle 6.81 Knuckle 6.81 Pan 50 Core “99 Cable 1.98 Cable 4.65 Cable 3.10 Cable 1.55 Cable "3 Cable "OL Switch 2.00 Cable Clamp ane paper 5k Bumper ‘37 Leaf 7.20 Leaf 6°03 Leaf hol? Spring 7.15 ns 5.52 ane 22.08 23392 Ww PR RE OW ENR PR PRON HPA EHP NPA DOUU He N He ~ RWB AE PU ON HHOADNAWUHHEN HH HNWNNEEHENNENNN EEE EEN OCH nN NUMBER 516351 516352 516394 516395 516396 516397 516456 5161496 516712 516732 517090 517126 517563 517638 517710 517903 517904 517905 517906 517907 517922 517929 517943 518002 518241 518289 518377 518119 518433 518452 5181.53 518626 5188140 518913 518914 518928 519065 519066 519067 519068 521473 521474 521475 521478 5211479 521181 521482 521188 521492 521493 521494 5211496 521197 521498 521199 521501 521567 521572 521682 521689 521690 521691 5217148 §21753 521754 521768 521779 521780 521781 521782 521783 521784 521785 521786 521787 521788 521825 NAME Bearing rt Bearing ‘4.l0 Bearing 7.08 Bearing 6.78 Bearing 6.05 Bearing 5.65 Gear Set 92,45 Guard 2.52 Radimeter hbk Sync 5.51 Seal eo Bumper 30 Link 7.92 Bushing 1.65 Bre. Set 5.6L Bre. Set 5442 Brg. Set 6,19 Bre. Set 6.19 Bre. Set 6.19 Rod 5458 Clamp 028 Gask. Set = 1,59 Hanger old Rod 1,32 Shaft & Lever .78 Arm 1.39 Arm 2.47 Bushing 3.08 Shim .03 Shim 1,08 Valve 8.40 Reapir Kit 6,08 Gear 285 Gear 016 Arm 3.30 Shock 6.60 Shock 6.60 Shock 13,20 Shock 13.20 Shaft 11.32 Shaft 5.95 Core 85,26 Gear 3.63 Bushing 15 Shaft 48 Shaft 1.36 Washer 050 Washer 1,20 Washer 1,08 Fork 299 Shoe 5) Yleeve ob6 Gasket 36 Fork 1.23 Spring oll Cotter 050 Shaft 17.6) Pin ar Pin a Pin og Shaft Pe Adptr. 345 Rod 2.90 Spring - Shock 3. 40 Shock "00 Shock at Shock *25 Shock 25 Shock ; "60 Shock 6.30. Shock 18 “hock 27.75 Shock Flange Re OWE OAD DD HME BH HW RR EMH NNWYOBHNHE Err Wwonnrt kr O COreM OHA DO OHM OWE ee RMR PRD DD RM OOO HO DOH DD Ww EO NUMBER 5201147 520150 520161 520225 520217 520305 520304 520362 520495 520779 520816 520828 520835 520836 52099L 521003 §21192 521362 521363 §21371 521386 521396 521425 521130 521431 521433 521434 521135 521437 521438 521439 52144 5214145 S2iL48 521455 521456 5211467 521469 524977 525039 525141 525142 525175 525206 525336 525345 525107 525137X1 525547 525587 525591 525596 525668 525673 525675 525927 5259145 525989 526020 526053 526070 526071 526077 526092 526093 526163 526199 526212 526223 ; 526221, 526225 526229 526327 aeeaee 333 526336 526337 526357 NAME Rod Set Rod Set Rod Set Gage Rod Lever Switch Housing Saddle Support Pump Brg. Set Bearing Bearing Saddle Tube Shaft Supt. Bar Supt Bar Gasket Plate Holder Shaft Rail Spring Cap Pin Spring Gasket Shaft Lever Clip Shaft Ring Plate Ring Lever Lever Bushing Bushing Saddle U-Bolt Bushing Kit Knuckle Pawl Clutch Knob Clamp Core Bearing Bearing Kit Gear Shaft _ Coupling Seal Spacer Clamp Fork Rod Rod Lining Shock Shock Knob Bracket Bracket Bre. Set Brg. Set Bre. Set Knob _ Arm Cable Cable Ring Bumper Rod AMT. 20.70 20.70 16.74 e31 035 1.86 2055 4.16 045 -30 11.42 10.8h 4.15 3.32 1.05 1.08 13.23 93 93 016 2.76 1.25 19.9k 1.45 06 OL, - 230 212 -18 1.54 230 207 11.11 035 4.17 02h 1.57 1.57 1.00 1.00 30 230 3.00 7.65 6.90 1.33 13.27 095 18 36.83 5.28 15.89 18.80 6.48 22.22 71 5.68 1.80 11.10 ONRFPNRPWHRAKHNOWUN ny Ne OM RW HHORrUNnwWPh a) AN AN OB BNN HENNE HRP N HP EP NW HWW HEHEHE OANHPE HNN BNR RPP HRH HEH NUMBER 521880 521889 522007 522023 522026 522013 522161 522179 522272 522279 522290 522302 52277k 522782X2 522783XI 522786XI 522966 523063 523100 523103 523105 523132 523573 523658 523703 521083 524101 52L182 5214183 524280 5214297 524316 521336 524391 5214633 524863 524913 529178 529220 529252 52938 529376 529392 529400 529167 529678 529719 529769 529770 529903 529967 530009 6300L7 5300L8 530050 630051 530100 5301L46X2 530181 530203 530204 530221 530222 530311 530364 530431X3 630713 530797 530813 530815 530934 530835 530858 530937 530959 530992 530993X7 NAME Pipe Spring Spring Shield Grommet Pin Set Plate Gauge Pin Rod Lever Rod Ins. Knob Knob Knob Switch Lever Mirror Cap Rod Reinf. Pin Knuckle Stud Washer Rod Set. Knuckle Knuckle Knuckle Piston & Pin Piston Knuckle Rep. Kit Core Bar Clip Shaft Pump Spring Ins. Cap Bushing Screw Shaft Seal Gasket Shroud Gasket Valve Oil Pan Thermostat Ammeter Guage Guage Guage Valve Wheel Cable End End Core Guide Seal Button Insert Handle Bearing Set Gask. Set Gask. Set Kit Grommet Grommet Cap Gasket Leaf Jet 10 250 057 038 2.80 2416 3.00 1.08 075 212 3.39 6.90 1.40 002 10.35 5.40 5.40 5.61 2.12 2.12 6.90 057 42.63 32.70 1.20 1.42 10.80 7.15 58h 1.38 L.4h 1.60 2.96 06 -O1 28 02 027 2.17 1.71 "3.51 1.85 4.62 3.70 3.86 49k 3.10 5425 5425 34.80 1.52 037 1.54 1.14 2.78 és fund KM HORHOR PH HEH RNOWUNNNUHHENE DOK EPMESWNUIWNPHNHY OHPDNW NUNFNNHNHWYwW Ne ny AOAN ARP RUPP RE DRBRrUORFRERNF NUMBER 526369 526371 52637L 526168 526530 526543 526716 526717 526718 526719 526731 526735 526739 526815 526901 527018 527088 527125 §27225 527517 54/5483 527L 24 527802 527875 527957 527959 52796L 527965 527964 527967 527968 527980 529011 529110 529132 532686 532733 532853 532939 534281, 609382 6093 83 609385 610610 610411 630079 630351 630352 630353 630354 630355 630357 630358 630359 630368 630369 630370 630373 630388 630710 630661 630785 63079] 630802 630803 635955 636313 636348 639224 639225 639227 639228 639235 639950 EL0202 61.0193 NAME Shaft Shaft Pump Bushing Washer Socket Ammeter Guage Guage Rod Ammeter Gauge Gauge Kit Switch Shaft Guide Kit Plug Plunger Shaft Ret. Kit Switch Pump Gasket Gasket, Gasket, Gasket Gasket Gasket Gasket Knuckle Shaft Lining Wheel Breaker GAsket, Lock evl. Kit Spring Panel Panel Panel Panel Panel Clamp Spacer Bearing Ring Ret Ret Ret Spacer Washer Bushing Shaft Plate Shaft Fork Roller Gasket Stud Flange Bushi ng Bushing Clip Cup Gasket Nut Washer Shaft Shaft Spring Spring Stud Stud AMT. 6.30 4.20 8.79 2.88 03 012 1.17 1.85 3.08 5255 5.85 7-70 760 5.18 3.00 4.01 1.52 22.50 bf e12 2.10 -30 3,00 17.58 08 18 -10 Of 1.20 ait 96 597 6.60 4.05 7256 ey 60 «20 2.10 38 aes Si 24.51 18.51 18.51 18.51 035 cm? 1.10 OL «ie 12 06 «07 025 -96 299 08 of7 .07 03 -70 2.75 3.55 96 sah 8.88 2.77 203 0/75 «20 6.56 1.46 12 012 1.08 1.08 QUAN. bh WR RMN DEH R ROR RP RH NWD ARMY RH OOWHRAWHPPY od ~~ ON ~ PMR EEE Er Hr NNWWWHPWWNN EE EPH ET HNNDN DODDS RH YP Ye YY DHEA NUMBER 531182 531190 531191 531219 531324 531359 531361 531409X1 531409X2 S31Ald 531424 531644 531693W 531722 531761 531767 531812 531811 531836 531837 531838 531846 532132 532134 532135 532161 532177 532161P 532200 532273 532282 532299 532365 532462 532591 652580 £52620 652720W 652737X1 652798 653028 653035 653036 653266 660138 661203 661330 661331 661333 661334 661346 661374 661515 663120 £63853 6614037 6614039 664010 66L0L9 66L078 661079 664160 664170 664442 66L 444 664445 66LiL6 664475 664522 664824 665022 665023 665026 665027 665190 €65169 665170 NAME Pinkit Pin Kit Kit Strainer Cam Tube Shroud Gasket Gasket Gasket Piston Brush Guard Lifter Brush Spacer Loom Ret Emblem Pad Cap Washer Switch Switch Switch Screw Rocker Arm Bracket Ret Kit Sector Bumper Core Choke Kit Kit Ammeter Reg Support Name Plate Knob Lock Fender Track Track Hood Ring Spacer Nut Nut Nut Nut Cone Shaft Hanger Bushing Hanger Cross Member Hanger Han ger Plate Bracket Bracket ROO. . x Pipe Bracket Cushion Guard Guard Clip Pinion End Hanger Hanger Hanger Plate Switch Cup Cone 1.05 % 6.40 9.60 1,84 60 ) 3.39 36.54 — ° _ = RO RD I I IRWIN RAD PH RR RRR RRR NPR HN Orme Nr ° ww a Ne ee ed ee ee oe ~ . . wa S32 ~ KHrO RH OAn eee Pes a once eyP “ wownreuw > * ~~ NUMBER sce 61,06 61,0666 610667 640675 6L0682 64,0718 640724 641168 64,1173 EL 5696P 61,8626 618627 4148679 61,2702 44,8710 64,8714 648796 4L88R9 648937 649102 64.9110 649111 649158 614.9159 651777 652091 652117 652121 652295 652318 65232h 652325 673176 673653 673663 673664 673691 673972 674041 671.059 674,068 671083 674152 674156 674312 671,372 674375 671,377 674392 671.393 671.396 674534 674.535 671.595 674.596 674,869 674881, 67,885 674.887 674888 674.890 674991, 675365 675393 675391, 6751.83 675601 675721, 675773 675775 675917 676151 676180x3 -676181X1 676181x3 NAME Belt Carrier Seal - Gasket Cone Gasket Gasket Gasket Flange Flange Mirror Door Door Grommet Fender Defl Pan Apron Hood Fender Grille Grille Grille Grille Grille Washer Channel Support Support Support Stud Hinge Hinge Hanger Flange Stud Stud Bracket Hanger Kit Gauge Lever Push Rod Spring Yoke Cross & Brg. Spring Bar Plunger Base Fork Fork Gear AMT. 1.00 9.26 2.56 1.98 7.25 kei? 016 208 4.00 16.05 1.36 25.20 25.220 68 13.33 1.79 98 4.88 24.38 15.2¢€ 6.45 hf 3 £413 3 80 6.00 2h 68 727k 4.71 S253 230 1.86 1.86 «20 3.09 rck? 1.47 075 5.82 1.54 93 19 8h 5.18 6.54 o2h 2.16 015 6.02 8.04 2.16 6.26 King Pin Set 3.61 King Pin Kit 4.36 Gask. Set Carb. Kit Oil Seal yeee rin Staars Sleeve Sleeve Cushion Stud Reinf, Reinf. Cylinder Link Spring Gear & Pinion Rod Diaphragm Cage 37 2.71 oL6 3.12 09 046 46 46 7265 1.62 1.28 1.28 10.00 2.79 14k 35475 1.84 13.50 553 Shaft w/core 2.14 Core Core 1.59 9.50 QUAN. bs PNUNHUNNHEPWHNDNH NEP HP RRR EE Rie FNRMNYINNH MOANRUH ARBRE UNEP RRP RW APO EPR Ree MPNNF NDP RRR RMUwY NUMBER NAME 665257 Pin 665290 Beam 665361 Hanger 665362 Hanger 665605 Washer 665791 Tube 665920 Flange 6466007 End 666009 Knuckle 666010 Knuckle 666029 Beam F4A60L9 Shaft 666050 Pinion 6660466 Shoe 666071 Spring 666108 Spring 666131 Spring 666167 Shaft 666276 Beam 666293 End 666822 Drag Link 666858 Switch 6466700 Hanger 667706 Hanger 667707 Hanger 672473 Rod £72504 Clevis 672551 Rod 672593 Shaft 672807 Nut 67322k Stud 673229 Stud 673249 Stud 678169 Chamber 678171 Kit 672327 Hanger 678392 Spring _ E7RLS3 Button & Wire 678537 Carb Kit 678541 Rep. Kit F-72818 Sleeve 672875 Leaf 679169 Hub & Drum 679223 Bolt 679257 Seal 679278 Washer 679279 Spacer 679375 Housing 679393 Insulator 6797L8 Pump 679756 Gauge 679789 Wheel 679998 Pipe 680017 Gauge 680154 Gauge FR0164 Ammeter 680446 Rod 681182 Lining Set ACCESSORIES AC 1386 Cap AC 1361 Mirror AC 1638 Mirror AC 1640 Mirror AC 2046 Light AC 2088 Ornament AC 2090 Arm Rest AC 2097Ventshade AC 2115 Kit AC 2116 Guard AC 2139 Ornament AC 2318 Ornament AC 2327 Guard AC 2328 Spot light AC 2331 Light o8L 10.20 3.08 13.7 13.45 1.7 3.08 6.95 . Os ON GS wn ) * . WeRrROSBHY OBWurw-)18s WH _ OAK NAHM FH ANNE NR OW BuonSeeo Our OUMru~) 91 alien miteecigl aa ee NUMBER 676190X2 676191X2 676215 676363 676456 676553 67655h 676587 676594 676617 676618 676659 676678 676682 676824 676893 676930 676996 677286 677309 6771,73 6774.76 677515 677530X2 67754 4X2 677604 677605 677705X1 677711X3 E778L8 6778564 677925 S--333 S-334 S=339 S-368 S--369 S-371 S-372 S--374 S-376 9-377 S-378 §-379 S-381] S-386 S-387 S-388 8-571, S-628 S-429 S-631 S-632 S-631 S-635 S-638 S-766 S~765 Large truck CARTER PARTS NN DEW E HR ANrN-E-H 3-3258 3-338S 3-3538 3-4215 11-2428 11-1628 NAME Shaft w/core Core Bolt Core Bracket Knuckle Knuckle King Pin Set Shaft Bracket Bracket, Ammeter Hanger Shock Abs. Shaft Bracket Shim Spring Pump Cup Pipe Bracket, Rod Clip Clip Knuckle Knuckle Knob Shaft Hub & Drum Shaft Leaf Pin Set Pin Set Pump Kit Pin Set Gskt. Set Rep. Kit Rep. Kit Rep. Kit Rep. Kit Rep. Kit Rep. Kit Rep. Kit Cyl. Kit Pump Kit Cyl. Kit Rep. Kit Rep. Kit Gaskt. Kit Gskt Set Gskt. Set Gskt Set Gskt. Set Gskt. Set Rep. Kit Rep. Kit Rep. Kit AMT. 4.20 3296 ~80 41.76 1.84 15.92 15.92 3.20 1.2k 1.24 86 057 525k 093 o31 «30 5.86 10.20 1.00 wheels w/tire rims KPNNY ERNE NYNNE NW QUAN. NUMBER bw Ac ~ HRN FEN OPE AC > 2843 2344 2409 2426 24,36 2437 528 AC 9280 AC 9280 1 678026 53A~2135 53A-2515 61-23 61-57 61-58 NAME Ornament Ornament Guard Lock Adapter Adpt. Kit W/S Washer Solvent Johnson's "Car Plate" Gauge RNAP RPRRENR EE een ar, 5.25 24.75 » 20 334% +50 50 1.46 9.00 1,38 M WPM YW & HP —e OO ONW BH DD ON DDD BD FF HW HWY ADO = ~» Mee WR RMD EIN NYDYHWDY HAH A Dw 14-2558 14--341 14-3428 15-358 21-498 21-708 25-335 2h-15 24-23 25-428 25-LLS 25-185 25-918 30-145 30-20 30-23 30-34 30-35 30-39 30A-37 30A-39 39-10 39-11 43-68 45-58 48-61 L&-77 L8=122 53A-1615 53A-168S 53A-211S 160-168 160-56 160-£75 160-71 1706-2358 170P-778 170K-235S 121-538 181-1018 181-114 181-1308 184-188 186-14 23-27 23A-16 F30-60 61-138 156-b4 156-51 156-52 156-29 627-SA L14-S L685 501 s NMUINAWD BAWUIADIWNNWNHHDNHNNNANNNENNENNNN me rs now Se ny co HO oO 61-148 61-151 61-157 61-171 61-173 61-187 61-188 61-190 61-200 61-201 61-207 61-211 61-213 61-253 61-261 61-298 63-2L 63-35 63-37 63-15 63-58 63-93 64-588 64-60 64-628 64-768 75-337 75-393 75-L8l, 75-652 75-4666 Gals Delco Super 11 Brake Fluid Arvin Heater Model #200 rge roll auto carpet material Ssorted rolls glass shim & fender welt pion “park plugs " " J-8 Cham H A8Sorted brass fittings RB=10 Trico Wiper blades RB-110-10 Trico W Assorted Sizes Wiper motor (Trico) " CHM-10-39 1 n CSM] -3 SSM-107 CSM~8 CHM 11.3 KSB 386 "Sienal Stat" Universal Carb an Permatex No. iper Blades fuse receptacles ne ~IP NONNHNANNWUOE AHH EUIADE AWEHND 117-665 117-74 117-9858 117-113 120-678 120--85S 120-1298 121-25 121-37 121-49 121-51 121-56 121-58 121-49 121-72 121-74 121-92 122-428 122-6LS 123-368 145-29 149-438 149-6258 150-62 150-92 150-97 150-98 150A-10 150A-13 159-58S 159-608 95 100 ft. copper tubing t . he 50 ft. W/S Wiper hose ¢ $367.45; that the United States of America claims for taxes the sum of if a Assorted size hose clamps “ ; s 1h! 500 ft. Assorted size electric wire $1,229.29 with additional interest and penalty on said sum: that the State of * Nuts, bolts, washers, clips, wire iin | » dC , ‘ i 6 pec tuelun eel ee fittings, S orth Carolina claims the sums of $56.45 and $74.64 for taxes, and that common | ii ae » Stove do ye ts, etc. sreditor's claims amount to the sum of $5,292.09, making a grand total of Light bulbs (automotive) a 2 6:40 x 15 tubes : $13,386.613 ma) 2 qts. Prestone : : at : te Windshield sealer & weatherstrip adhesive And it further appearing to the Court from the said report that prior aT i Brigss oil filters 0 M g : ‘ eee 12 C2 & C3 oil filter are a to the date when proceedings in insolvency were instituted, no judements or ie fs 10 GE #4030 seal beam h/lamps~ : i" ci m—: peote — licht bulbs S jiens were filed against the said Black and Taylor Motors, Inc. on the records vt / ssorted battery tables ‘ j | habeas | 4 " brake a of Iredell County: and it further appearing from said report that there is no a Sets 5:50 x 15 tire ; atl ae record of any real estate mortgage or deed of trust executed by Black and Taylor i He 90 gts. assort. Sti eo ‘ the mortgage records of Iredell County, nor d ae a oe S uncancelied chattel mortgages executed by said Black and Taylor Motors, Inc. on bh : Sets 1953-54 Studebaker seat-covers the chattel mortgage records of Iredell County: Ei iil " 1954250 . | de 4 ” 1949-51 Plymouth : : : And it further appearing to the Court that written notice was given by t ty hy) the said Receiver, bv registered letter, to the last known address of every a hi NATIONAL SERVICE MANUAL ; peal ath CHILTON FLAT RATE MANUAT P claimant who had properly filed claim with the Receiver, setting forth that his el STUDEBAKER REPAIR MANTIAT? e Hh " STEP . Tie oa » findings as contained in his report would be heard and determined at a hearing un Hi iets : : ; ite ii before the undersitned on Monday, January 31, 1955, or as soon thereafter as ne Hi TOTAL PARTS & ACCESSORIES © --sancsccusoas. saan $5,537.48 # ordered by the undersigned: } fi | a) Hee Ua fa TOTAL INVENTORY Lp ay i AL INVENTORY ----enamenccasatccmwenensiuel $9 687.68 ; And it further appearing to the Court that at the said hearing before the Pe a Hf This the 5th day of June. 10 . ; ~ ue | feels 2, 195L. indersigned, no interes.ed parties appeared other than the said Receiver and his Vt /s/ Baxter H. Finch aCCorne a Baxter H. Finch, Receiver i North Carolina, : F IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered, adjudged and decreed that, upon the expiration gt | In the Superior Court. : wil i Iredell County. of three days from the date of this Order, unless in the meantime exceptions to iL | Ro} S i Ai and as a Stonek sg individually, ) ‘he same are properly filed, the said Baxter H. Finch, as Receiver of Black and if himsel older, on behalf of ‘ in and. jenn in uae who may coma aylor Motors, Inc. disburse the funds in his hands, to wit: his receipts of Beit “nis proceedi; en . i ORDER 93,299,682, as follows: VS. Ce i Balck and Taylor Mote ist. That the costs of his administration as Receiver, as itemized in th J ,OrTrs nec, Para ; This cause com; graph IV of his report, in the total amount of $1,800.68, be paid to the i a ling on to be h firms 4 of the Fifteenth Judic; 1 fard before the undersigned Resident Judge and individuals and for the purposes and set forth in sub-sections 1-12 Finch, Receiver for pj k » upon the Report and Petition of Baxter™ | inclusive) of said Paragraph IV. wack and Taylo 2 Court from the s ; — Inc., and it appearing to the nd. That the balance of the funds remaining after payment of the costs > Said report that receipts j “a t of administr ; n the hands of the said Receiver ation, to wit: the sum of $1,499.00, be paid and disbursed in amount to the sum o f $3,209 68. | fo 299,68: that costs and Receive’ ‘cord with the priori ; r administration amount t expenses incurred by the priority and preferences of the unpaid claims as follows: © the Hs That the United States of America be paid the full amount of its ‘laim for taxes Claim, sum unpaid wages amount to the Sum of $1,800.68; that claims for accrued an 1 oO te wit: $1,229.29, with interest and penalties due on said hin a. the two months period prior to the Ppro- at th 3 wae © County of Iredel} Claims for ad valorem tare ec acai ity of Statesville Claims for ad valorem taxes ™ ‘thi $2,025.00 was earned for and wit } | - | . | ceedings in insolvency: the sum of $366.01. b. That the balance of the funds in the hands of the Receiver ft ° Sl ter pay, ment of claim to the United States of America as above provided be paid ’ Pro=rat, to Robert C. Black and William F. Taylor, as their respective interests appear in Paragraph V of the Report, by reason of wages earned within the two» h Onth's period next preceding the date when insolvency proceedings were commenced as provided by North Carolina General Statute 55-136, 3rd. That the Receiver report his disbursements to the Court 4th. That this cause he retained for further orders, This the 1 day of February, 1955, Frank M, Armstron Resident Judge, Fifteenth Judicial District, Presiding at the Ja ss t ti nuar Term, Iredell Superior Court, . North Carolina | Iredell County | In the Superior Court Robert C, Black, Individually and as a Stockholder, on behalf of himself and creditors who may come in and join in this proceeding, vs FINAL REPORT OF RECEIVER <P Black and Tavlor Motors, Ine, To Honorable F Frank M, Armstrong, Resident Judee of the 15th Judicial District; The Undersi a i 1gned, Baxter H, Finch, as Receiver of the Black and Taylor Moto j Otors, Inc., having been du ly appointed by Order of Court dated May 5, 195k, respectfully reports to the Court as follows: I That under a is n Order of the Court entered February 1, 1955, the undersigned eiver was or : BEL eRS dered to disburse the funds in his hands, to-wit: his receipts »299.68, upon the expiration of three | 3) a nd er unless in the m ays from date of said order, eantime e : xceptions to Said order were properly filed. recej as follows: tie $3,299.68, as provided by said Order l. Q 9° a ct | Ce je of Administration Statesville Daily Record Inc. otice to creditors published May ll, 18, 25, June 1, 1954 $16.80 Summons to Defendant published May 12, Notice Receiver's Sale of Automotive Business published May 26, June 2, 1954 L.hB Notice of Sale of Accounts Receivable published noe. 2, 9s 16, a2, 1954 7250 32.68 Lazenby Insurance Agency Premium on Receiver's Bond-Policy #25538h- $5,000.00 25.00 Virginia Webster Preparing inventory and secretarial help for Receiver 50.00 H. H. Yount, Agent for Mrs. Marion Fi Carne and e . Yount, Owners Building rental under Receivership May 5, 1954 to July 1, 1954, at $300.00 per month 550.00 Helen C. Turner Secretarial help for Receiver 50.00 Bernard Robinson & Co., Certified Public Accountants, Greensboro, N. C. Auditing books and records and preparing tax returns and forms for Receivership 300.00 C. G. Smith, Clerk Superior Court Court costs 26.50 Less advancement paid by Scott, Collier & Nash, Attorneys, at com- mencement of action 7.00 19.50 Scott, Collier & Nash, Attorney fees for services 350.00 Covrt cost advanced at commencement of action 7,00. 357.00 M. L. Nash, atuomobile expense- trip to Salisbury and return re Order appointing Baxter Finch, Referee. 54 miles at 6¢ 322k Automobile expense-trip to Newton, N. C., and return re Order confirming sale to H. H. Yount. 46 miles at 6¢ 6.00 ny . On Baxter H. Finch, Receiver- commissions Receipts $3299.68 Disbursements 299.68 Total 299. @ 5% : 329.66 eaxter He Finch, postage, office Supplies, long distance telephone calls, general office expenses and miscellaneous travel expense 70.00 Peoples Loan & Savings Bank -1-5, check book for Receiver 2.80 6-16-54 service charge on checking account 50 12-9-5) intangible tax on receiver's checking account 1.60 _hbe90 TOTAL COST OF ADMINISTRATION $1,800.68 2. Claim for Taxes to U. S. of America, Director of Internal Revenue, Greensboro, North Carolina, Prin¢tpal tdance of Tax claim to U. S. of America 5% Penalty on Tax $1,229.29 Accrued interest on Taxes 64.80 Lien fees 51.79 ne TOTAL TAX CLAIM $1,348.88 Riki ti ~ ae s Claims or Wages earned within two months period next proceeding com mencement of action in insolvency Balance of funds after paying cost of Administation and Tax Claim, to-wit: $150.12, disbursed as follows: ae Robert C. Black, Statesville, North Carolina prorata share of $150.12 on basis of $125.00 x .6672% 83.40 b. William F. Taylor rorata share of $150.12 on sauss of $100.00 x .6472% 66.72 150.12 150.12 $3 5299.68 transaction in this matter, the under- TOTAL PAID FOR WAGE CLATMS TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS WHEREFORE, having fully reported Signed Receiver prays: 5 Ae. That € 26 his report be audited and approved. That t : ; upon the same bene audited and approved, he be discharged and relieve i d as Receiver for the said Black and Taylor Motors, Ine. R a+ : espectfully submitted this the 17 day of February, 1955. Baxter H. Finch Baxter H. Finch, Receiver fr Black & Taylor Motors, Inc. SCOTT, COLLIER & NASH Attorneys for Receiver By M. L. Nash North Carolina , Iredell County Baxter H, Finch, being duly sworn ’ deposes and says that he is the duly appointed and acting Receiver for Black « makes this affig nd Taylor Motors, Inc., and as such Tidavit: that he has read the foregoing Report and the same 1s those mattes and things as are thereil as to those, he believes it to be tr’ Baxter H, Finch axter H, neh, Receiver for Black & Taylor Motors, Ine. ———nr M ent Ju r 15th Judicial Distr IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY + ¢, Black, Individually, a a stockholder, on behalf of nimself and ereditors who ay come i j is proceeding in and join in th P a VSe ee a i ee ee et Se Black and Taylor Motors, Inc. This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor Frank M. Armstrong, Resident Judge of the 15th Judicial District, upon the Final Report of Baxter H, Finch, heretofore appointed Receiver of the defendant corporation; and it appearing to the Court that under a former Order made by the undersigned the said Receiver has filed his final account with the Clerk of this Court and that said final account has been audited, approved and confirmed by the undersigned; and it further appearing to the Court that said Receiver has performed all duties imposed upon him by the Court and has well and truly accounted for all property and funds coming into his hands as such Receiver; IT IS THEREFORE now ordered, adjudged and decreeu: 1. That the said Baxter H. Finch, Receiver as aforesaid, be and he is hereby discharged; 2. That his sureties upon his bond as such Receiver are relieved from further liabilities; ! 3. That by reason of the distribution of all the assets of the said ety insolvent defendant corporation as aforesaid, the said Black and Taylor f Motors, Inc. is hereby dissolved. So 4. That a certified copy of this judgment. of dissolution be filed in the office of the Secretary of State and also in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County in which the principal office of the corporation was located, and the same be recorded in the Corporation Book and in the Record of Incorporations in these offices respectively as provided by North Carolina General Statute, 55-137. This the 21 day of February, 1955. _Frank M,. Armstrong __ Resident Judge, 15th Judicial District. we KK Kk ke eK Ke me OK OK KOK OK 1#5933 NORTH CAROLINA. IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR coupr, Twin City Pontiac Company, sae Na as JUDGMENT, Fred L. Stvers, defendant. . * eee e . e This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G Smith, Clery : = » Cler of the Superior Court of Iredell County upon motion by the Plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default finals . ” s And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed in this action t 0 r action on the 20th day of January, 1955: that summons was issued on the 7 2 Q 7th lav af 5 QO : . aay O! Januar vis 1955, 1U being a clain and deliver V pr oceeding; > B ’ And it furt i | further appearing to the Court that said Summons was served on the f e defendant on the 7th dav of January, 1955, and that the complaint was Served upon the defendant on the 2kth day of January,1955; And 4+. f i it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleadi : \ Pleading has been filed by the defendan¥and no extension of time to file pleadings hz P ss has been granted and that the time within which pleading may be filed has expired: And st f ; + urther appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of action con sist Sists of the breach of an express contract to pay 4 Sum of money fj y fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $329.09 with interest lary, 195k: thereon from the date of 2 Febr} And it furth °“r appears from the verified complaint that the plaintiff Claims the right Bnt to the possession of a 1946 "ord 2-door Automobile, Motor Nl. 99A-913133 in ss in order that he may sell the same as provided ina certain e+ mortgage executed by the defendan t and that ancilla to this action the plaintir¢ caused to te be issued cl : Re | aim and delivery papers for said property NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AD 3 JUDGED AND DE , plaintiff have and recover of the defendant ee ee the sum of $329.0 thereon from the 2nd day of February 1951, 9.09 with interest ) Ene. | ; that the Plaintiff is entitled to the n of said automobile and it 18 So ordered; that the defendant shall ~ C. G. Smi — Clerk of the Superior Courts — * "5909 6 sees bk No, 5898 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY an and Savings Bank Péopley, 6 Plaintit’ W. J» Kiker and E. W. Hamlet T/A Hamlet Insurance Agency, Defendants ) ) } s . ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard before the Hon. C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendants W. J. Kiker and E. W. Hamlet,bv default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 20th day of November, 1954: And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a ll copy of the said complaint were served on defendants W. J. Kiker and E. W. Hamlet on the 24th day of November, 19543 And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleadings have been filed by defendant W. J. Kiker and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired: And it further appearing to the court that by order of the undersigned made December 18th, 1954, the defendant E. W. Hamlet was allowed until the 7th day of January, 1955 in which to file answer, but that no answer, demurrer or other pleadings have been filed by the defendant E. W. Hamlet and no further extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired: And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach offan express contract to pay a sum cf money fixed by the contract, namely thesum of ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SIXTY FIVE AND 26/100 ($1,365.26) DOLLARS® with interest thereon from the 21st day of June, 1954 until paid, and which sum is evidenced by a note made by tefendant W. J. Kiker and endorsed by defendant E. W. Hamlet: Now, THEREFORE, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants W. J. Kiker and E. W. Hamlet the sum of ONE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SIXTY FIVE & 26/100 ($1,365.26) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from the 21st day of June, 1954, and the costs of this action. This the llth day of March, 1955. erk of the Superior Court Scots + Collier & Na Attorneys for plaiaerte; eee KK eK Ke KO KH _ commissioner shall retain five (5%) per 3 : cen “of $50.00 WNo. 5882 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPER IREDELL COUNTY ‘et Franklin Savings Bank of the City of Boston and R. A. Collier, Trustee, ORDER AND er CONFIRMATION OF SALE OF LAND aT PUBLIC AUCTION BY COMMISSIONER VSe Dock F. Mitchell and wife, Shula Mitchell, Defendants TO: The Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County: Tr I N : : Whereas, M, L. Nash, commissioner, prusuant to an order of sale of this Com dated December 23, 1954, reported to this Court on January 29, 1955, his sale at “9 public anction of the land described in Paragraph X of the complaint herein to Franklin Savings Bank of the City of Boston at the price of SIX THOUSAND AND NO/100 af ) ARG . ($6,000.00) DOLLARS, and said report having remained on file for more than ten (10) days and no advanced bid having been filed: A t+ 4 + ‘i : nd, it appearing to the Court from the allegations set forth in the recoris herein that the defendant, Dock F, Mitchell is an enlisted member of the J, S$, hir Force and by f hi $14 y reason of his military status and in accord with the provisions 9f th Soldiers and Sail je d Sailors Relief Act was represented by legal counsel appointed by the Court, namely. M n : ’ ly, Mr. Boyce G. Gibson, Jr., attorney at law, Statesville, North Carcliri, who filed : ‘ answer to the complaint herein on November 22, 1954, on behalf of the said veter ndé i an defendant, wherein the allegations set forth in the said complaint were admitted; And the i issi : Said commissioner having filed his supplementary report on the 10th day of Febrary, 1955, recomending that the sale be now confirmed: It is theref : i €rore considered, ordered and adjudged that the said sae be, an the same is hereby approved and confirmed » and the said M. L. Nash, commissioner, is authorized and di asia directed to execute and deliver to the said Franklin Savings nk of the Vity of : y Boston , or its nominee, a deed conveying said kmd in fee sinlt upon receipt by him on the Purchase price Out of the proceeds from said sale, ™ : {ons of the price thereof as his commiss for sale of the Property, pay the costs Mrs. Boyce G, Gibson, Jr, 1, including ; , attorney for unt costs of thet any specific liens ¢ defendant, Dock F, Mitchell, in the ame e - 3. Documentary pease’ may be on record against the lands, and t bruary, 1955, F 7 " Resident Judge, oe k aoe x TN TOROS Wee ew ADSLEE NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- MARCH TERM, 1955 Monday, March 14, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1955 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, March 1b, 1955 at 10:00 o'clock A. M., with Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Judge presiding and holding Courts of this Fifteenth Judicial District, Winter Term, 1955, present and presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARY $. SLOAN ) Plaintiff VS. ) ORDER ) HENRY GRADY SLOAN ) Defendant This cause coming on to be heard on the motion of 8. S. Brown, Jr., attorney for the defendant, and it being heard by the Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Judge of the 15th Judicial District of North Carolina at the March Term, 1955, of Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that under an order previously entered in the cause by the Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, a certain nc*e and deed of trust executed by Troy S. Sloan and wife to Henry Grady Sloan was ordered placed in the hands of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, said Clerk to act as receiver of the funds due under said note and was to hold said funds for payment in compliance with the order entered: and it further appearing to the Court that said Troy S. Sloan has paid in full the principal and interest due on said note and now desires to have the same turned over the the attorney for the defendant so that the note and deed of trust may be properly certified for cancellation so that Said deed of trust will no longer be a lien against his property; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County be and he is hereby ordered and directed to turn over to B. S. Brown, Jr., attorney for the defendant said note and deed of trust so that the said attorney may have the note and deed of trust Properly certified for cancellation. This the luth day of March, 1955. Frank M, Armstron udge Presiding Ke Ke ek Kk ew ke Kk KR OK Ke OK 103 hats ae oe 4Sp3751 Sam H. Ostwalt & wife Ruby Ostwalt, Katie 0. Newman, et al vs Gaither Ostwalt & wife Levy F. Ostwalt, et al Set premonitory for This Honorable Court at 10:00 O'clock A, M IN SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------MARCH TERM® 1055 Monday, March 14, 1955 ; first case Monday, March 21, 1955, t akes recess until Tuesday Morning, March 1), 195% IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1955 Tuesday, March 15, 1955 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesdav Morning, warch 15, 1955 at 10:00 ofclock A. M. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names 7f the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the first week of the March Term, 1955, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: R. E Stroud R. J. Newton J, D. Johnson Davis Reid Brawley A. L. Brown Houston Jurney Harold C. Austin J. L. Shumaker Ww. 0. Bell Gordon S. Troutman Ross M. Hager W. E. Sherrill Moore Ralph J. Norris Johnson W. H. McGraw Jcehnston Buford G. Spann Knox tee FOR Sharpe Brantley D. Stikeleather McLelland Robert J. Williams Mrs. Fred B, Bunch, Jr J. Le Robinette Fred L. Sherrill J. Morrison Troutman G. L. MeLelland P. L. Cartner Morris G. Johnston Leonard T. Johnston Wilson Godfrey O. R. Brewer Fred Herrin H. F. Watts Houston Jurney is a non-resident. Fred L. Sherrill is a non-resident. leonard T. Johnston is a non-resident. H. F, Watts is a non-resident. J. Morrison Troutman is excused by Doctor's Certificate. Ralph J. Norris igs excused by Court. C. R. Moore is excused until May 23, 1955 Term. Ha rold C. Austin is excused by Statute. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- MARCH TERM Tuesday, March 15, 1955 » 1955 The following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed ' e the Divorce Jury #1 to-wit: R. 8. Stroud R. J. Newton J. D. Johnson Davis Reid Brawley A. L. Brown Je Le. Shumaker W. O. Bell Gordon S. Troutman Ross M, Hager W. E. Sherrill K. E. Johnson W. H. McGraw . s # 5 Q 6 § 5 NORTH CAROLINA 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY J} MARCH TERM 1955 Emery C. Carrico, Plaintiff ) -vs- SS } ISSUES Mt tal nN : Margaret W. Carrico, Defendant | e j th intif : . Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes “Ne <. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from “ ? " each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other » ror more than t : ; . San? 1 wo years continuously prior to the institution of this acti. Answer: 3. Yes, H . . as the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolina for m © : ore than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes, NORTH CAROLIN INA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY RM 1955 MARCH TE Emery C, Carrico, Plaintirer ) -VS- \ JUDGMENT Margaret W. Carrico, Defendant } THIS CAUSE, ‘ eard and bein +s term of the Superior Court of ¢ heard at this » North Carolina, before His Honor Frank M. 0s Jury, and the jury having answered the +8 Submitted to it b , » by the Court in favor of the plainitff and against the defend” 4S set out in the records ft that the b oe therefore, ordered, and adjudged bY the onds of matrimony hereto Carrico, and the defend ore existing between the plaintiff, the plaintire is granted an oe varrico, be and the same re o a bsolute divorce from the defendant. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- MARCH TERM, 1945 Tueday, March 15, 1955 ASO6L N E SUPERIOR ips CAROLINA IN THE SUPERI COURT REDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM 1955 ifred Caldwell Grose, Plaintiff } Win ye as i ISSUES Huett Flake Grose, Defendant { 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. 2, Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. NORTH CAROLINA | IN THE cae COURT IREDELL COUNTY {| MARCH ony ae" Winifred Caldwell Grose, Plaintiff roo / \ ,JUDGMEWT 7 -vVs- { | / Huett Flake Grose, Defendant ae AW i n to be heard ale yeine/ reaper this term of the ounty, North Carolina, before His Honor Frank M. i e! THIS CAUSE coming Superior Court of Iredel Armstrong, Judge presidin jury and the jury having answered the issues Submitted t it by the Co in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, A / as set t It) i matrimony hanetofore existing between the plaintiff, Winifred Caldwell Grose, and the sh sadeki, Hyett Flake Grose, be and the same are dissolved, and the plagntirr is er as i , absolute divorce from the defendant. aon en Frank M. Armstrong Judge Presiding Ke Kk KK KK KK Ke OK OK OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MARCH TERM, 1955 Tuesday, March 15, 1955 4 #5166 NORTH CAROLINA J] IN THE IREDELL COUNTY | SUPERIOR Coury Mary S. Sloan, Plaintiff oer JUDGMENT Henry Grady Slaon, Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard upon the motion of the plaintiff before the Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Judge holding the regular March term of the Iredell Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that Kk. A. Hedrick, attorney for plaintiff, and B. S. Brown, attorney for the defendant, were present, and the Court having heard the gatement of counsel, and it appearing to the Court that this is a motion to have the Clerk of ouperior Court of Iredell County, who has heretofore heen appointed as receiver of certain fu r t nefi inti ertain funds for the henefit of the plaintiff, and it appearing to the Court + : : si ; rt that the plaintiff's motion is to have certain funds now in the hands of the Sf S) “dor Conrt+ he Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County turned over to the plaintiff for the purpose as set forth in the plaintiff's motion, and it appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that it is necessary that the plaintiff have a portion of said funds in addition to the regular monthly payments here-- inbefore provided for the cost of the purchase and installation of certain bath fixtures, which the Court finds as a fact that it is reasonably necessary} It is therefore considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Clerk F Q of the Superior Court of Iredell County, pay to the plaintiff, in addition to the regular monthly pavments hereinbefore provided, the sum of $490,00 to cover the co : St of the purchase and installation of said fixtures. This the lkth day of March, 1955, Frank M, Arms tone 5 eaditt Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presidins a Ste © 8s 4 4 6.6 4.6 6 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PTRST WEEK eee wrr st" MARCH TERM. 1955 Tuesday, March 15, 1955 0 {ori CAROLINA i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY aC. A. Sykes, —_ Plaintiff, * os JUDGMENT D. W. Scott, L. B. Lyerly and a. Defendants, In this case,°at the colse of the plaintiffs evidence, the plaintiff, open court, announced through his attorneys, Messrs Grant Bolmer and R. Battley that he desired to take a voluntary nonsuit: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and he is hereby allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this case. This the 15th day of March, 1955. Frank M. Armstrong Judge Presiding xe keke KK RK KK KK OK K This Honorable Court takes recess until Wednesday Morning, March 16, 1955 a Se ee = IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ««<<<<=8== MARCH TERM, 1955 Wednesday, March 16, 1955 W57\9 NOKTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court IHEDELL COUNTY August Ruof, Jr, ) Plaintiff, ie ) ) ORDER TO STRIKE Ue Ae Fesperman, Hivthe Brothers ) Sar atcha Company, and William &, Davis, ) Defendants, ) This cause coming on to he heard hefore the undersiened Presiding Judee upon the motion of the defendant - Rivtihe Mrothers Company, to strike from the amended complaint at a term of the Superior Court of Iredell County heing held on the date set {"¢ rth healow, and heine heard, and the court being of the Opinion that the sald motion should he allowed: It 18, therefore, ordered, add4udmed and decreed that the following be and 4{t {8 hereby Stricken f ‘ror Paragraph XITI of the amended complaint: And in order to look after the needs of his wife who was tnfured in said collision This 1h day of March, 1955, Prank M, Armstrong Presiding Judee W571 NORTH CAROLINA IRDELL COUNTY Mary Pearl Kuof, Plainnire Plaint4 . Ve Blythe Brothers Company Ce Ae Fesperman, and William &, Davis, ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) Defendants, This cause comin Cause coming on to he heard hefore the undersiened Presiding Jude upon the demurrer of the defendant , Blythe Hrothers Company, to the amended complaint. ay 7 ' 4 ‘ ' a Se @ Oeem ef the vuperior Court, being held on the date set forth below, and heing heard, and the court being of the opinion that the demurrer should be over ruled: It is, therefore, ordered that the demurrer of the defendant, Blythe Brot u ) rothers Company amended complaint to the be and it 4g hereby over ruled. This lh dav or March, 1955 NN tact } SUPERIOR COURT ST week cae MARCH TERM, 1955 ua Wednesday, March 16, 1955 NORTH CAROLINA IN TH SUPERIOR COURT (REDELL COUNTY ) mary Pearl Ruoty atart, | s ND APPEAL ENTRIE i} CU PT ONS A ) AVP UA ky KON) TA aed Company, eB hn Nhe eal Roe a ajythe Brothers nigth Pasperman, and Wet ;, Davis, iiiien 8 Defendants. ) % * ¢ tc the ru ing of’ the The defendant, Blythe Brothers Company, excepts to N * + * . ~ 1 s t. and + ¢ 's demurrer to the amended complain { said defendant's court overruling . » + ‘-afrom to the Supreme he order overruling the said demurrer, and appeals here from f "ne ’ « : Court. Notice of appeal given in open court. Appeal bond in the sum of $50.00 ie adjudged sufficient. This 14 day of March, 1955. Frank M, Armstrong. Presiding Judae one #5918 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ‘\lliam K, Brawley, T/A ‘rawley Seed Company _— vs LSSUES © Kovee Perry, T/A ‘erry Implement. Company ee ee ee How much, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff: Answer: $990,143, #5948 Miiom Ky Brawley. 1/ brawley Seed Company : Koyo p iy © Perry, T/A Porry Implament Company J ; "Y @Morn and impanelled as follows and answered the issues as set out above Ly Cartner Re D. Knox anne Beg uohnaton We i MeGraw 0 renee W. O, Bell fred Nerrin KR. Be Stroud ford g, Spann J. D. Johnson B. D. Stikeleather IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ae cee TERM, 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST ee Scie 36 1958 FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1955 eo ae Wednesday, March 16, 1955 17 IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the Plaintiff, , No. 59L8 e Defendant, Henry S. Setzer, the sum of North Carolina 3, Ae Little, have and recover of th ' 1 In the March term Superior Court ae red Dollars ($1200.00) and the cost of this action to be taxed by tweive Hund William K. Brawley, T/A the Clerk of Court. Brawley Seed Company t signed and entered in the superior Court of Iredell County, North Vs UDGME} sited Carolina at Statesville on March 16, 1955. Royce Perrv, T/A f sie Yantareat Caseant Frank M. Armstrong ee ee Judge Frank M. Armstrong This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by the undersigned Judge : . Consented to: and a jurv, and the jury having answered the issue azainst the defendant in Adams, Dearman & Winberry Attorneys for the Plaintiff the sum of $9090,13: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant is Henry S-_ Setzer Henry S, Setzer indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $990.43 and that the plainitff recover ¥990.43 with interest at the rate of 6% pe: annum from date from the defendant, Asn6a a + - * - y uy and that the defendant pay the costs in this action as shall be taxed by the MATH CAROLIBA , In the Superior Court Clerk. IREDELL COUNTY. March Term 1955 This 16 day of March, 1955, Samuel G, Hall, Frank M. Armstrong . Plaintiff, ce Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT = & & Ne ac x x* ‘ a4 xe ote i . Romulus Vance Miller, / #5605 NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant. IREDELL COUNTY. oO hago ee THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, Ye ” itt S, Plaintiff, Superior Court Judge at the March Term 1955 Superior Court of Iredell County, VS. JUDGMENT ‘orth Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of C. B. Henry S. Setzer, linberry, Attorney for the Plaintiff, and A. B. Raymer, Attorney for the Defendant { | . defendant, that all matters and things arising on the pleadings filed in this This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable action bet > things Frank M. ities. ween the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and all matters and Judge presiding at the March Term, 1955, Iredell County = : arising in connection with and out of the Arrest and Bail which was had in perior Court, and it appearing to the Court ” , that ths is an action involving an automobil , this action, have heen settled and compromised, and that the Defendant has opi te accident between an automobile be longing to the Plaintiff and th agreed to : 0.00) Defendant, which occurred on November 22 5 slam ns ces te amarante nce ad 1952 at a point in Iredell County an where the d the cost of this action, all of which is to be paid upon the signing of 70: that it appearing this judgement and after state that upon payment of the aforesaid sum, the Plaintiff re- ments made by counsel for the Plaintiff and by lease Statements made by Henry S$. s Sthe Defendant from any and all claims and actions arising on the ¢ cetzer, the Defendant, that the parties hereto have Plead ‘ mutually agreed and consented to all ma ings filed in this action, and that the Defendant releases the Plaintiff tters and things arising on the Plead- from any and al] chi ms, that by the terms of the agreemen rights, actions or causes of actions that he has or cover a t, the Plaintirrf is to have and re- Might, have in any way or manner arising out of, in connection with, or growing Out 9 ($1200.00), f the Arrest of the Defendant in this action and the Arrest and Bail Proceeding which was had herein. ea aS ae 30 ier SSeS SS = Sees i = i = sin IN THE. SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MARCH TERM, 1955 Wednesday, March 16, 1955 It further appears to the Court that the Defendant is to be in all respects released from the bond which was executed in this Cause, and that the surety on the bond is to be released and the bond in all respects discharged, IT IS, THEREFORE, By and with the consent of C. B. Winberry, Attorney for the Plaintiff, Samuel G, Hadl Plaintiff, A. Bs Raymer, Attorney for the Defendant, and Romulus Vare Miller, Defendant, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the Plaintiff have and recover of the Defendant the sum of Fourteen Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1450.00), the same to be paid immediately upon the signing of this judement. 2. That the Defendant be taxed with the cost and that he pay the same immediately upon the Sisnine of this jndement. 3. That the payment of the aforesaid sums of money by the Defendant constitutes a full and complete settlement of all matters and things arising on the pleadings filed in this action. 4. That the Plaintiff is released from any and all claims, rights, actions and causes of actions that the Defendant might in any way have in connection with or srowing out of the Arrest and Bail and the Arrest of the Defendant had in this action, >» That the Defendant is herebv released and discharged from the bond Riven in the Arrest and Bail had in this action, and that Mrs. C. B. Myers, the Surety on said bond, is hereby in all respects released and discharged from Said bond, and the bond in all respects terminated, This the 16th day of March, 1955, Frank M, Armstrong Judge Presiding The foregoing judement js hereby in all respects agreed to and consented to by the following: Samuel G. Hall Samuel G, Hall, Plaintiff ADAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERRY BY: ie BB Winberry Attorneys for the Plaintit? Romulus Vance Miller, Romulus Vance Miller, Defendant RAYMER & RAYMER BY: A. B,. Raymer Attornevs for the Defendant #5746 O8 2.8, eine ew OK we me ek George Pinkney Martin vs John Banks Shomaker, Jr, Jury sworn a nd impanelled as follows and answered the issues as follows: R. J. Newton F. L. McLelland Gordon Ss, Troutman Davis Reid Brawley Ross M, ceate ta ne . Willams a. Ll. Shumaker K. B. Johnson penere B. Butich H. Re Johnston G. L. McLelland UPERIOR COURT ag ovata MARCH TERM, 1955 ’ Wednesday, March 16, 1955 Noe 5746 Martin ’ George Pinkney Plaintiff, VS. ker, ats John Banks Shoema Defendant. et ee Se ee ee be wn Ww tr U . Was the plaintiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of 1, Was t , * the defendant, as alleved in the compaint? Answer: Yes. 2, Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his own ° 1 - o ; damaged Answer: Yes. : eo 4 sre ant q to 3, What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled . recover of the defendant? Answer? i intiff as Lh. Was the defendant damaged by the negligence of the plaint a oe alleved in his further answer and counterclaim? Answer? j . n i “Oo recover 5. What amount of damages, if any, is the defendant entitled to e of the plaintiff? (a) Personal inivry: Answer: (>) Property damage. Answer: ed —— NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. Pe ee George Pinkney Martin, wiki JUDGMENT. ~~ John BAnks Shoemaker, Jr. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Hon. Frank M. A™mstrong, Judge Presiding at the Regular March, 1955, Term of the Superior ving “ourt of Iredell County, and a jury, and issues, as appears of record, ha deen submitted to, and answered by the jury: aah Now, therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaint ‘ave and recover nothing of the defendant, and that the defendant have and ay “seover nothing of the plaintiff on his counterclaim, and that the plaintiff pai the cost, This the 16th day of March, 1955. Frank M. A r udge Presiding. 2 *2* 2h 2 Oe ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1955 Wednesday, March 14, 1955 Mf 596k NORTH CAROLINA | IN THE SUPERIOR court IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM 1955 Winifred Caldwell Grose, Plaintiff | -vs- | JUDGMENT Huett Flake Grose, Defendant { THIS CAUSE coming on to he heard and being heard before the Honorable Frank M. Armstrone, Judge presiding, and a jury, at the regular March term of the Superior Court. of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that summons was personally served upon the defendant, and the defendant filed an answer, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record, it is, therefore , considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that tne bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the de- fanaAan a 2 one oe . : : 1 : rendant be dissolved and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant: A . a. en - : , . And it further appearing to the Court that one child, Brenda Diana Grose, : t r . an eae . ‘ ‘ 7 age two years, was born of the marriage union between the plaintiff and defen- + + $ 2 4 s ; dant, and that said child is now and has been ever since the separation of laintiff an + + : p j and defendant in the exclusive care and custody of its mother, the plaintiff, and the defendant havine filed an answer in this cause by and through his attorney, W. R. Battley, asking for the right and privilege of visitation of the infant child, and the defendant and his attorney, both being present in Court at the trial of Said cause, and the Court upon the evidence offered find as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and proper person to have the care, custody and control of said child , and the Court from the evidence furth rs ; er nds as a fact that it 4@ to the best interest of said child that the mother have t he care, custody and control of said child, and the defendant having , ; > prayed for the right and Privilege to vwsit and be visted by said child; it is, theref ; , merore, considered, and ordered that the plaintiff be and she hereby sao and the defendant is ordered y the Court t bule é © pay to the plaintirr each and every week, the sum or $12.00 for the support and maintenance of said child auth anc the defendant is hereby uthorized and granted the privilege of bei z n ® visited by said child upon his requestof the plaintiff : Re : the mother of the child, once each month on Sunday, e sent tha t he can take the child with him to his home or some other Suitat uitable place in the compnay of the plaintiff: further order of the Court 7 this cause is retained for the with respect to the care, trol and Support of said child custody and con This 16 day of March, 1955. a Nae ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---~--~ MARCH TERM, 1955 Wednesday, March 16,.1955 - AS736 OLINA In the Superior Court NORTH CAROLANA, March Term 1955 IREDELL COUNTY. wjlers Mutual Insurance Association of Illinois, Plaintiff , - JUDGMENT Ys. Slenn Johnson . alenn , Defendant. VW THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, at the March Term 1955 Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina’ and the Plaintiff having introduced its evidence and rested its case, and the Defendant having thereupon moved for a judgment as in case of non-suit, and the Court being of the opinion that such motion ought to be allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED That the Plaintiff be and it is hereby non-suited, and that the said cause be, and it is herebv dis- missed, and that the Defendant recover of the Plaintiff his cost, and that all of the cost of this action be ta»ed against the Plaintiff by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. This the 16 day of March, 1955. Frank M. Armstrong. Judge Presiding kok wk eK Ke Kk KK OK OK Ow x AP-3828-A NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY In Re: The Matter of "rs. Jettie Mae Windsor Respondent ) 1055 This cause coming on to be heard, and heing heard at the March term, stron of She Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honro, Frank Me _, in the? Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that this is a procee ing Hono aoa. of an inquisition into sanity which was duly heard before the Caroli e Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North eh ha on September 17, 1954, and the respendent appealed from the finding and piers Clerk to the Judge of the Superior Court by writ of certiorari fact y ns heard de novo by the said Court, and the Court finding as a that aha nedical testimony that the respondent is mentally competent and of lo ki 18 in possession of her full mental facalties and fully capable Oking after her own affairs; t iS, theref he order of co : fore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the oe heretofore entered by the dt eek of the Superior Court of Iredell Proceeding ond the same is hereby overruled and dismissed and no further sh of Midon agnan be had under any orders heretofore entered, and this cau St the respondent is hereby dismissed. Frank M. Armstrong Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding TREE ee ee ee ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ MARCH TERM, 1955 Wednesday, March 16, 1955 45819 : NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH 1955 TERM PRED H. CUDD AND WIFE, ) BETTIE JEAN CUDD ) VS. ) JUDGMENT EDGAR L. GHEEN AND ) JULIA 3. MOORE ) This cause comine on to be heard, by agreement, before HONORABLE FRANK M. ARMSTRONG, PRESIDING JUDGE, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiffs and the Defendants have agreed to compromise and settle all matters and differences between themselves according to the terms and con- ditions of this Judement. It further appears to the Court that the adjudication of the rights of the parties in this action are not intended to affect the rights of any other parties except the litigants in ths action and their heirs and assigns, It further appears to the Court that by the terms of this agreement hetween the parties that the Plaintiffs own property located on the West Side of the alley in Block Fiftv-Three (53) of the Statesville Development Company and that the Defendants Own property on the East side of said alley and by the terms of this asreement, Plaintiffs make no claim for the Hastern half of said alley containing approximately five feet in width and a depth of one hundred feet and the Defendants make no claim for the Western one half or five feet. of said alley and for the depth of one hundred feet and agree that the ad said ‘acent property owners may use that portion of alley free and unmolested by the use of the parties adjacent and on the Opposite sides thereof, e It further appears to the Court that the because of the fact that ther are permanent improvements in the Eastern one half of said alley that the Plaintiffs Will release by Quitelaim any right or claim they may ne the Eastern one half of Said alley to the Defendants their heirs and assign: It is therefore, ordered, adstudeed and decreed, by agreement, and without Prejudices to the right of es any other parties other than the parti to this action, : on, tiffs have a right and easement, by dedicat! to the Block Fifty--Three (53) of the Statesville Development Company for 4 an? IN THE SUPERIOR Seats sas WEEK ------ MARCH TERM, 19 Rae panavely, March 16, 1955 ilmington Avenue North and that the Defendants, d feet from Wilm of one hundre irs and assigns, shall not in any manner obstruct or interfere with : s a their heir ful and quiet enjoyment by the Plaintiffs of the use of said part the peaceltu : d driveway and easement for such purposes as may be for their use and of sai rj ' ror the purposes for which it was dedicated. for t The Plaintif® are taxed with the cost of this action. Frank M. Armstrong Presiding Judge. We, the undersigned, jointly and severally agree to the fore- going Judgment. Julia B. Moore Julia B. Moore Edgar L. Gheen Edgar L. Gheen Hugh G. Mitchell Hugh G. Mitchell, Attorney for Defendants Scott, Collier & Nash By R. A, Collier Attorneys for Plaintiffs wee we we ke we Kk Ke mh Ke kK Kk Ke Xe AS6E9 Thelma Ostwalt vs Sam H, Ostwalt Set for hearine on the Motion Calendar for March 21, 1955. Ke KK Ke ee KK mK eK OK #5606 H. E. Meadows vs landreth I, Pruitt f 1955. Set for trial bv Order of Judge Armstrong on Tuesday, March 22, ? kok ow eke keke ke ke ok oe OR Ke OK 21, 1939 This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, March at 10:00 a, M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRr IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1955, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid on the 2lst day of March, 1955 at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where His Honor, Peyton McSwain, Judge, is present and presid , ing by appointment, as per the following Commission: OFFICE OF THE uF JUSTICE OF THE SUPEREME COURT of the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COMMISSION PEYTON opecial Judzes of the Superior Courts of North Carolina. GREETING: WHEREAS t h LEAS, It has been made to appear to the undersigned that a one week Special t f 3) ‘ peciai term of the Superior Court for the trial of civil cases is scheduled to be held + 0} , “ } : : in the County of Iredell, beginning Monday the Twenty-first day of March 1955 : eee 72>, and that it is necessary for me to assign a judge to hold said term of court, NOW, THEREFORE, I, M. V. BARNHILL, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby commission you te hold said term of Said Court for the County aforesaid, to begin on Monday, the Twenty-first dav of March 1955, and continue one week, or until the business is disposed of, 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name as Chief Justice of he supreme Court of North C rolina, on this Eighteenth day of February, 1955+ : M._ V. Barnhill Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of North Cgrolina Max 0. Cogburn Administrative Assistant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 ASL yORTH CAROLINA { IREDELL COUNTY | P, Gryder, Plaintiff } IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Pauline -VS- jonald Gryder, Defendant | THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard at the extra special March. 1955 term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before the undersigned Judge holding the Superior Court of Iredell Countv, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action for divorce a mensa et thoro (divorce from bed and board) and for support for the plaintiff and the five children born of the narriage union between the plaintiff and defendant, and for counsel fees, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff by and through her counsel, of record, 8, A. Hedrick, has filed a motion for alimony pendente lite, for support and naintenance for her and the minor children born of the marriage union between the plaintiff and the defendant, and for reasonable counsel fees, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant was personally served with summons in said cause, and was properly served with notice of the motion for alimony pendente lite, and the defendant being respresented by his attorney of record, W. R. Battley, and that both the parties and their respective attorneys were present at the hearing of said motion, and the Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff has not sufficient ‘unds whereupon to subsist during the pendency of this action and that the plaintiff has noysufficient funds with which to prosecute this action to obtain the relief prayed for, and the Court finding as a fact that the defendant is an able bodied "an, and has an average weekly income of approximately $35.00, and the Court finding “a fact that the plaintiff is entitled to an order for support for the minor hildren born of the marriage union between the plaintiff and the defendant, and ‘or an order for reasonably counsel fees to prosecute said action, and the Court Pinas “ding as a fact that the plaintiff and the defendant are now living separate and ‘Part, and that the minor children born of the marriage union between the plaintiff and th * defendant have been taken by the plaintiff to the State of Virginia, where ‘hey now reside: It 4 S, therefore, considered and ordered that the defendant pay to the Plaintipe i the sum of Twenty-four dollars ($24.00) each two weeks for the support nd maint *nance of the minor children born of the marriage union between the plaintiff "nd the det endant, and that the first payment of twenty-four dollars ($24.00) shall be Tue and payable on or before the ith day of April 1955, and each two weeks ‘hereatte r Orde tan the further order of the Court, and it is further considered and Ted by the Court that the defendant pay to R. A. Hedrick, attorney, for his IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 services in bringing and prosecuting this action for the Plaintiff, the sum of fifty dollars, ($50.00), the same to be paid on or before the 15 day of May, 1955; this order is made without prejudice to either the plaintiff or the defendant in the final determination of said cause, and it is further ordered by and with the consent of the parties that the children be brought within the jurisdiction of the Court when this cause is set down for final determinati, N, Peyton McSwain Judge Presiding By consent: irs. Pauline P. Grvyder x eS 2.2 2:9 82 Se * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Martha Ann Wooten, by her Next * ‘riend, Nettie Wooten, % risiacifr. 9 x JUDGMENT VS. b 4 Fred C. DAniels, * Defendart, This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding ani h ine t 3 2 m ; : olding the March Special Term 1955 of Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearj is i ppearing to the court that this is an action brought by the plaintiff, Martha Ann Wooten 14 » 4 minor represented by her mother, Mrs. Nettie Wooten,as Next Friend, agai ia : » 4fainst Fred C. Daniels for personal injuries caused by and growing out of an automohb; * + utomobile accident that happened on or about the luth day of November, 195L, at ° . i » &% Abbat. 4230 otelook P, M., in Iredell County, North Carolina on U. %& ghway #21 about five miles north of Statesville, Nerth Carolina, while the Plaintiff, a oj j firl of thirteen vears of ace was in the act of crossing said high- way at that point: i : Point; and it appearing from the pleadings and the statements of the plaintiff and her mother that the plaintiff, Martha Ann Wooten, ran from behind a car parked on the shoulder of Said highway into the path of the car driven by the defendant; and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendant have voluntari nvarily agreed upon a settlement of all matters and things Srowing out of the facts set forth in the complaint, and that by the t erms of said agreement, the defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $1261.10 ; Ly in full comprom; 18e settlement: oh, The plaintiff w aS present in Cour t ee with her mother, her Next Friends after examinj of her mothe pons the minor Plaintiff and hearing the statement r, and the Statement of her daptes ’ care of said minor after her injuri Dr. John Hardaway, who had the Juries, 4 gation is of the Opinion, after full investiget!™ " IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 ris fully recovered from her injuries sustained in said that said mino ident and that she has made a normal recovery, and that the settlement en acc roresaid is fair and reasonable, and is to the best interest of said afor minor: It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that ’ the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $1264.40 and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk in full, complete and final settlement of all calims and demands of whatever nature and kind growing out of said automobile accident. It is further ordered and adjudged that out of said sum of $1261.40 that the sum of $261.40 be paid to Dr. John S. Hardaway and Iredell Memorial Hospital for nengitnd” and medical expenses for the plaintiff, and the halance of $1000.00 to be paid into the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County for the use and benefit of the minor, Martha Ann Wooten. This the 2lst day of Mareh, 1955. Peyton Mcowain Judge Presiding By consent of: Fred G. Chamblee Attorney for Plaintiff week kK Ke KK Ke KK OK OK OK \#58L2 NORTH CAROLINA J IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY H] SPECIAL MARCH TERM, 1955 Murray Biscuit Company, Plaintiff ) VS. { F. D. MeCoy and Margaret Leona McCoy | THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard at the March 1955 Special Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before the undersigned Judge holding the March Special Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel f nut *r the plaintiff and the defendants that it has been agreed that the plaintiff shall have and recover of the defendants a judgment by consent, and it appearing to t - he Court from the statement of counsel that all the matters and things in con t "oversy between the plaintiff and the defendants have been agreed upon, it has th *refore been considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and "ecover of the defendants the sum of two hundred dollars ($209.00), and that the cost, of this action be taxed against the defendants. —_—___—_Ferron Mesyg fa udge presiding —Re A Hedtick rendants ttorney for Defendants IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 #5074 North Carolina, In the Su eri Iredell County. Perior Court William George Alexander VSe Ollie Kimbrough & wife Elizabeth Kimbrough, Thaddeus Kimbrough & wife kster Kimbrough & Connie K. Spicer & hushand Robert Spicer This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 2lst dav of March, 1955, Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING #5081 North Carolina, *. t 3 j rt Iredell County. in the Superi Lucinda Bellamy } j VS. 1 3 { Alfonzo Stevenson j . , This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Court before the ersien ide : ] he undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called b i y the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be non-Suited, and it ; ‘© appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: i is therefo ordered aj tion be, 4 Store ered, a Judged and decreed that this acti , soa the same is hereby dismissed and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 2] day of March, 1955 Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING "WOR Cen e 6 be — Ce IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 117 ; 4 Kel Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. Lillie K. Morrison VS. a <= o q2 = & James William Morrison This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is herebv dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 21 dav of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING #5164 North Carolina, sa : i In the Superior Court Iredell County. Glenn Gilleland VS. Mitchell Glenn Meseimore Infant J. B. Meseimore & Alma J, Meseimore ae ee EE CY C4 cS o QO 4 < This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would he non-suite , and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 21 day of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING Kee KR OR KK OK KR OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 v# 3921 me North Carolina, Iredell County. ae: manera — James L, Warren } VS. | , JUDGMENT Bertha Mae Murdock & i eeestent Hushand W. L. Murdock | this cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersiened Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the a Shute ie Filia intitTT was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or 7 7 A h @Q114 5 4 ; 2 ° + he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and proseente this action: T+ + Paw : it is thereforeordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, This the 21 dav of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING a ee ae a a te oS “i L, 2 0 4 North Carolina, Iredell County. 7 oe Christopher C, Wellman VS. _—_— eee eis Cc © G = 3 2 Emma McClain wie this cause j . : coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior h efore the undersiened Court vudge, and it appearing to the Court that © the Plaintiff was eo ~ nalle bs S $ d by the Sheritf to come in and prosecute this action oF he would he non : ~ NOn-Ssuite 5 ; ed, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglects + -O appear and Prosecute this ac tion: It is therefor vne e e ‘ ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed —— . and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 2] day of March 1955 Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDIN aan a RE nen anes reat REO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 #4379 ; sarth carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. qenry J. Setzer & J, F. Wilson VSe p, S. West, de R. West& Fred Lowrance qy o OQ = GB ar m 4 This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiffs were called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or ‘As neglected to appear and prosecute this action: | i ba Big they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiffs failed and dee ft vile | ‘ j It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this actionbe, and the | same ig hereby dismissed, and the plainitffs are taxed with the costs. This the 21 day of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING 421,407 lorth Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court iredel] County. City of Statesville vs i, A. Bost & wife Della C, Bost ic, to i, Ia I= Ite — [a This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the ‘laintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he "ould be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected ‘© appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and ‘he same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 21 day of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING Kk Kk Rk Kk KK OK OK OK OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 North Carolina, anne : In the Superior Court reael VLOUNTV.e Allie Brown Johnson UDGM Charles W. Johnson This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredel] Superior de peri Court } efore tha unders signed Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would he non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: 1a Ss therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action and thesame is s hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the This the 21 dav of March shig 1955, Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING fore it 4,7'73 a \ ’ ° North Caroli na, il . re or Court Iredell ] County, County of Iredell] VS. Elizabeth N. Grav et, al This cause ¢c ; £ : ‘ vs Comings on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before t} ind 4 : ore the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that. the Plaintiff was } } S called hy the Sheriff tO come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-s13 : ° Suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and ne 2 glected to appear and prosecute this action: It is theref : rerore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same j ‘S hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 2} day of March 1955 Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING K x xe oe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 [#4874 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell Countv. Pred L. Burgess VSe L, 0. Hawkins This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 21 day of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING HLRL8 “orth Carolina, : In the Superior Court Iredell Countv, ialker Lyerly, T/A ‘leckory Ponltry Market & reed Co, vs. 4. C. Church << Ce This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior court , . rt before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plain tif , és ‘iff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he WOU . Culd be non=suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to ‘ppear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the Same 4 ae 8 hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 21 day of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING wo Ke me ke oe oe oe oe ok ok N THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Monday, March 21, 1955 /$L.O17 North Carolina, In the Superior ¢@ Tredel) silted. Lountyve Mrs. Raeford Warren Raeford Warren This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court, hefor N@ 1} ; , , + s vourt before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the I : 2p " ’ : : Plainti was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or ehe wilaA he a +74 + 3 ‘ ; } she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and nev. o lected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adiudeed and decreed that this action be, and th » ic herehy ; ; B ‘ ; i vne same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 21 day of March, 1955, Peyton McSwain JUDGE PRESIDING SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company Defendant This cause i . Se coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, Peyton McSwain, Judge P $a , © Tresiding, at a special March 1955 term of the Superior Court of Iredell Count : unty, and being heard without a jury upon an agreed statement 0! : acts, and t Rovtsin : . ' he Court finding as a fact that at the time of the death of Charles Walter Dancy on Aueust & , 1S not entitled to recovery: ct i6 therefore ordered 7 , ad‘udeed and decreed, upon the motion of Land, Sowers, & Avery, Attor f nevs for the defendant, he that the cause of action by * tiff he dismissed, plain d and that the said cause of action is hereby dismiss Ss cause of act This the 21 day of March and the Plaintirrr 10n is herehy nonsuited. Peyton McSwain —FaDeE PRESIDING * ok Me oe bd ote ‘ x x : Hooke oe * te te * lonora le Cour t takes a rec | aay *’ at 10:00 o'clock a, “SS until Tuesday, Morning, March 1955, This IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Tuesdav, March 22, 1955 This arch 22, 1955 at 10:00 o'clock A. M. Mh , 44 J. C. Rumple, High Seriff of Iredell Countv returns into open Court the e ° — anes of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for nam , eae first week of the March Special Term, 1955, Iredell County Superior Cour to-wit: thomas J. Wilhelm A. 0. Bass Carl V. Westmoreland Mrs. RK. J. Rogers g, Re Mullis James E. Stutts #t a Glenn F. Stutts Le: Ae Parks Ray D. Raymer Flake R. Conner ¥. F. Bass Mrs. Nola J. Beard Ry diy aes OP J. C. Joyner A. M. Joyner Mark L. Gurley fn C. A. Sykes Taw ROLLOY, Sts F. Kelly, Jr. de iene Morrison J. I. Ostwalt Lynn H. Sherrill J. Carl Shumaker Miss Sarah Tharpe James Gentle Herman L. Troutman Early L. Tillev James E. Rarv C. F, Thompson Sherrill Keller James M, Lone Willis H. Roy Thomas 2 a. Summers Beam Arthur Swain Henry .Deal G. V. Hall was excused bv Court. ". F, Bass, J, C. Joyner, A. F. Kelly, Jr., and Early L. Tilley were excused by Court, M pe TS. R. J. Rogers and E. R.j Mullis were excused by Doctor's Certificates. T “e A, ‘s : Parks and C. A, Sykes were excused by being non-residents. The following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1 to-wit: Thomas J. Wilhelm Mrs. Nola J. Beard Car] Vv, Westmoreland s Re be ALLOY, Sho ‘lenn PF, Stutts Mark L. Gurley James E, Stutts T. E. Keller, Sr. Ray D, Raymer J. L. Morrison Flake R 7’ onner 53 Cstwalt this i + uU Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Tuesday, March 22, 1955 4#5979 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court IREDELL COUNTY j SPECIAL MARCH TERM 1955 Shirley Mae Carson Curlee, Plaintiff -vs- Qn Henry Clay Curlee, Defendant } 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes. 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two vears continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff heen a bonafide resident of the State of North Car i 2 for r t e3 2 : a : : Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? ANSwers IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SPECIAL MARCH TERM, 1955 Car Cri : varson Curlee, i ' "xa~ } JUDGMENT Clay Curlee, Defendant THIS CAUSE i a ie vm Coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Sup rio Cour 4 J] l ¥ Y r arc li € I ] ¢ al ede] 1 Coun Y « NO th U . na, = * 7 ; , M >ywwalin & \ p j i 4 + “ - * J idge resid ng, and a ur V a id the J ry lavil iss eS suit nit ) V Y O° the pla ssues / ed o 2 1e 2Ourt in a | 0 the defendant, as set nt g + ; . 0 in the record: it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged bv the Co ‘ s©Q Ov the Court th t} ) oO hat the honds of matrimony heretofore existing between the inti euween the plaintiff, Shi y M ) : » YNirley Mae Carson Curlee, and the defendant, Henry Clay Curlee, b ‘ © and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is Franted an absolute divorce f¢ rom the defendant. Peyton McSwain Judge Presiding ae ae ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Tuesday, March 22, 1955 A586 Nerth carolina ne Iredell County george De Scruges Issues VS Yelen W. Scruggs was the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more ‘ instituti this tion? shan six months next preceding the institution of th action Answer: Yes 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? . nU? Answer: Yes 3, Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes Vare er : orth Carolina a ‘ - In The Superior Court Iredell County George D. Scruges VS. Judgment - . . » + » . . . . Helen W. Scruges This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Peyton McSwain, Judge ‘Tesiding over the special March Civil Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and being h : I . : £ + } neard before said Honorable Peyton McSwain, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted to the Jurv?: 1,. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for nore t} ; : : : : : ; 9 ‘Nan six months next preceding the institution of this action: 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived Separate ‘ : : ‘ : f > and apart, continuously for two years next preceding the institution 0} this action? T . ‘ he Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". It is, therefore, bv the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of ’ matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant de for ‘ver dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo "rom th © defendant, Helen W. Scruggs, and that the cost of this action be taxed agaj nSt the Plaintirr by the Clerk. This 22nq day of Mardh, 1955, Peyton McSwain Judge Presiding xee Kk KK Ke OK mK we See ngeeeteetah rn —atiareleitar ate ae ee a AEP aN Sn Anae re 2 > > meas = Pape + Se a I ae aa ec ee J45801 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Tuesday, March 22, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR cour? IREDELL COUNTY ny . ; MA, C. Morris, Pilainitrfr William S. Moore, A - c ~ =) o Q $2 cS — ha Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor reyton McSwain, Judge Presiding at and holding the March Special Term 1955 } lrede 1 Superior Court, and a jury, and during the course of the trial, attornevs for the plaintiff and the defendant announced that they had reached an agreement to settle all matters and things arising out of the plaintiffs action and the defendants cross action and counter claim whereby the defen- dant would pay to the plaintiff the sum of $950.00 in full and complete compromise and settlement: It is therefore, by consent, ordered, adivdged and decreed that the Jlaintiff have 1 rearove +} } 5 plainti lave and recover of the defendant the sum of $950.00, together 5 + ho Nate . . 5 ; } with the costs of this action to he taxed by the Clerk. Vw 4 /*« Wa ea oe — this the 22nd v of Mar 1955 2 dav of March, 1955 Pevton McSwain Judge Presiding MCLAUGHLIN and BATTLEY met... We R. Battley \ + Attorneys for the Plaintiff? ___Fred G. Chamhke Baxter H,. Finch \e+ avtorneys for the Defendant mK oe oe ok ok ok oe ok te oe oe ok ok ‘oat! CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Tuesday, March 22, 1955 587, ’ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY y, B. Orren and wife, tant) meets 7 Plaintiffs, ft I | VSe george Little, trading as Blue ss , ; 4 nr Cab Company, and Edwin Clyde Mowbray, Cus << Iw Iq — Defendants. THIS CAUSE COMING ON TO BE HARD, and being heard before His Honor cevton McSwain, Judge Presiding at the March 1955 Special Term of the Superior Court cf Iredell County, and it appearing to the court from the statement of counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of One > Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($1,600.00) and the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction thereof: NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of One Thousand 5ix iundred Dollars ($1,400.00) and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 22nd day of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain Judge Presiding Consent: , Fred G. Chamblee \+ ‘ttorney for the plaintiffs revcott, Collier, & Nash Attorneys for the defendants "7" Re A. Collier IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Tuesday, March 22, 1955 [Ue vif 56L8 NORTH CAROLINA N nm mr YY PRR IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR courT Bennie Rav Freeze ze, Plaintif ££ : Ton eG Jr. and T) f lan Vertfendants. DD & HEARD, and being heard before the Honorable nd re P sj ; f\ me ‘ | Presiding at the March 1955 Special Term of'the i nel) a Younty. Nort ; ; ounty, North ina, wpon motion of the defen- Arerican Ins 7OmM i insurance Company is a proper partv to this + om wr Oh ms > 4 : 7 ny : pan e made a party plaintiff to this action: and court f rom the motion and argument of counsel for all ie} ion, that the court in i j j i rs] ini she court in its discretion is of the opinion insurance Company is neither a necessary nor proper I ; OR] Wh OT A NY AT) .TTIT) / *T 9 UtUEnsD AND ADJUDGED that the motion of the defendants moc \ ° american insurance Company a party to this action be, and Overruled and denied, ~ Ot March TOGE ° 4 Peyton McSwain Judge Presiding i ee f LF 5608 4 He &. Meadows ) ) vs ) ) ) Landerth I. Pry sf Jury \ Ay) ‘ y Sworn and impanelled as follows: Thomas J. Wilh “o Ue ee elm oe Carl V. Westmoreland nav wD, ntayvmer ae Flake R. Conner Ne Le Alley 2 | q y 9 Jr, : Mack L. Gurley us he Ostwalt A. M Lynn H. Sherr}1} * Joyner ns . a pi . pigs | Ss Gentle ending trial the Court at 10:00 O'clock A, M This Honorable Court at 10:00 O'clock A, M 055 takes oO * 8 recess until Wednesday Morning, March 239” takes om °S 4@ recess until Wednesday Morning, Mareh 2) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Wednesday, March 23, 1955 45696 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY CIVIL TERM MARCH 21, 1955 H, EB. MEADOWS, Plaintiff -vVSs- LANDERTH 1. PRUITT, Defendant . was the plaintiff injured and damaged by the negligence of the defendant alleged in the Complaint? Answer: __ Yes 2, If so, did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to said injury and damage as alleced in the Answer? Answer: ___Yes 3, What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover for personal injuries? Answer: 4. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover for damages to his automobile? Answer: Was the defendant's automobile damaged by the negligence of the plaintiff alleged in the Answer? Answer: If so, what amount,if any, is the defendant entitled to recover for damage his automobile? Answer: —— #5868 Dwicht T, Barker vs Gilbert Engi i Zineering Co, George 0 Wetherford ve J ury sworn and impanelled as follows: Sherrill x eller Roy Thomas Henry Deal James EB, g + ot utts J. L. Morrison Thomas J. Wilhelm p Carl V. Westmoreland Plake R. Conner R. L. Alley, Sr. Mack L, Gurley p Glenn F. Stutts end ing trial the Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, March 24, 1 955, at 9:30 O'clock A. M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 MARCH SPECIAL TERM, 1955 Wednesday, March 23,1955 Thursday, March 24, 1955 able Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday Morning, This Honor XBRKXAKXAKABXYXAXSARXAXXK, | : on varch 24, 1955 at 9:30 o'clock A. M EREEXAERORABEE XE SURE X BANE EXE HES EEE XGHE LEX EH OHSAS XK GN AHEM J > X3q 1 #5868 ORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Nwight T. Barker bung Plaintiff vs. Gilbert Engineering Company, Inc. and George O. Wetherford Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor Peyton McSwain, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the March Special Term, 1955 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the plaintiff having introduced his evidence and rested his case and the defendants, after first agreeing to a’nonsuit of their counter-claim, thereupon moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit, and the court being of the opinion that such motion ought to be allowed; NOW, THEREFORE, It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plainitff be, and he is hereby, nonsuited and that said cause be and it is hereby dismissed, and that the plaintiff be taxed the costs of this action by the Clerk. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendants be, and they are hereby, nonsuited as to their counter-claim. This the 24th day of March, 1955. Peyton McSwain Judge Presidins. To the ruling of the Court and to the signing of the Judgment the plaintiff excepts and hereby gives notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. consent of counsel for the parties herein, plaintiff given Ninety (90) days ‘0 file his appeal and defendants given thirty (30) days thereafter to file their f reply. By further consent, appeal bond is set in the sum of ONE Uy “NDRED ($100.00) DOLLARS. Peyton McSwain Keke kK Ke kK Ke Kk RK OK OK This Honorable Court takes a rec 1955, at 9:30 or €ss until Thursday Morning, March 2ky Lag pepe oe 4 JUDGE PRESIDING JUDGE PRESIDING Clock A, M, N THE SUPERIOR COURT SPECIAL MARCH TERM, 1955 Thursday, March 24, 1955 Sample-wWinters Implement Co. vs Edward M. Cloaninger & T, T/A C & H Implement Cones nem nomer Continued Maynard L. Johnson vs Boss Reid, Curt Reid, Rosa Lackev Harris vs Silas . H. Vi ¢ ] vs R. V = is ‘i l Davis s | N. Davis, d Continued Dickson Board of Education of Iredel] Helton, County Superintendent Iredell County County & S, H, Of Schools of Continued Lolleither Smyre Scott Wade Franklin Scott Continued Mary Alexander Parker vs Ernest Lee Parker Md Continued Continued friend Cora Smith Continued Certiorari it. Windsor Continued Shumaker T/ A Fairview Grocerv Oil Company of Khyne & Statesville, Ine. Continued jerce Continued & Beatrice R. Bailey-- Continued General Accident Continued M. L. R. Walt Huskin T/A Gaston Body Shop Continued Cecil Continued id he Cecil Continued Ni 4 47> NID A : 1 Willie Hill, BNF Georse Continued H 1A Be ee ee + otewart, Henry J. The ee “ducation of Iredel} County Continued Stewart & Were Miner N. Alli sid te va WwW. Allison Marie Waddell Continued L. G. Nash Vv H h i : . "S hs MM. Morrison, Mrs. Mattie Mae Morrison et al --- Continued John Smith vs Rohert Continued eee S nenderson vs Duke Templeton Continued Clarence L, | RNR a i roole BNF Sarah M. Cornelius vs Ray James - Continued A. L. Sim m vs Dave a Brown Cont inued | ‘ #e # i ) NOR raEDELL COUNTY | 0 CAROLINA | 0 - 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT : D . .f L, Lynn Nesbit, Plaintiff -vs- vincent Muncy, Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard by consent before the jersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to undersis the Court upon the statement of R. A. Hedrick, attorney for plaintiff, and E. J, Prevatte, attorney for defendant, that this is an action for damages arising out of a certain automobile-truck collision, which occurred in Brunswick County, North Carolina, on or about the 5th day of October, 1953, and it further appering to the Court that the parties and their. respective attorneys of record have consented and agreed that the plaintiff shall have a judgment against the defen- dant in the sum of $200.00 for the damages to plaintiff's automobile becruse of the automobile-truck collision described in the plaintiff's complaint. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND DECREED by and with the consent of the parties and their respective attorneys that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $200.00, and that the defendant be and he hereby is taxed with the cost of this action. C. Gs. Smith Clerk Superior Consent? ; R, A, Hedrick Attorney for plaintiff Ee J. Prevatte ‘ttorney for defendant L, Lynn Nesbit Plaintiff ‘incent, Muncy Jefendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SPECIAL MARCH TERM, 1955 Thursday, March 24, 1955 Sample-winters Implement Co. vs Edward M. Cloaninger & T. R T/A C & H Implement Con-cagrre om ~--Continued Maynard L. Johnson vs Boss Reid, Curt Reid, ~--=Continues Rosa Lackey Harris vs Silas Harris Davis, J? s Rk. W. Davis, Jr, ~~ Continued Dickson vs Board of Education of lrede] Helton, County Superintenden Iredell County 1 County & 3. 4, t of Schools of ~ Continued Lolleither Smvyre Seott VS Wade Franklin Scott Continued Mary Alexander Parker ernest Lee Parker Continued hichard James Panl, ~a--=-—== Continued friend Cora --- Continued Vindsor Continued umaker T/A Fairview Grocery ithyne & ompany of otatesville, Continued T. M. Gladden Continued le Motor Coach Co B. Bailey & Beatrice R. Bailey-- Continued General Accident Continued Huskin T/A Gaston Body Continued Continued Cecil Kelly Continued Willie Hill, BNF George Continued narold B, vtewart, Henry J Education of T 7 irede]] - - iol e Otewart & \y M Nau V The Board 0! | Continued Minerva W. Al Allison ve Marie Waddell] Continued L. G. Nas ‘ H N r ‘ash vs H, M, “"Orrison, Mrs »ie Mae Morrison et al --*- Cont inued vohn Smith. vs Continued Ve R, Henderson Continued -———-— Vv Clarence | ‘es Cornelius vs Ray James - Continued Ae iy Sims PPOWA scmniidaiacnnidin uiuauiiie ball w-<-- Continued 1 0 ; isrq CAROLINA | THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY | Tr > fg 1. Lynn Nesbit, Plaintiff Le -vs- f t Vincent Muncy, Defendant 1 s i bh > yr the a : e and being heard by consent before THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard . : Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to k of the Yuperior Ce undersigned Cler 5 . eae iF ss f R. A. Hedrick, attorney for plaintiff, and E. the Court upon the statement of HM. A ’ , , t this is an action for damages arising J. Prevatte, attorney for defendant, that fa certain automohile-truck collision, which occurred in Brunswick County, ot er vat . . . h QOS ait further appering ‘orth Carolina, on or about the 5th day of October, 1953, and i " ont to the Court that the parties and their. respective attorneys of record have consented and agreed that the plaintiff shall have a judgement against the defen- dant in the sum of $200.00 for the damages to plaintiff's automobile because of the automobile-truck collision described the plaintiff's complaint. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND DECREED by and with the consent of the parties and their respective attorneys that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $200.00, and that the defendant be and he hereby taxed with the cost of this action. CG. G. Spith Clerk Superior vonsent Ry A, Hedrick attorney for plaintiff Bs as Prevatte ++ ‘“cvorney for defendant =+_Lynn Nes rlaintiff MR 1 lincent Muncy Jefendant, A ee anal Pe ests ate eat a oe shag en me te 2 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR coypn IREDELL COUNTY JRE THE CLERK i & SAVINGS BANK PLAINTIFF KNDANT This Cc 1S nm t h . pause coming on to be heard before the Honorable CL. Smith, Clery, f Gian : ere £ 2 rae ‘ f : 5 Or superior Court of Iredell County, upon Motion by the Plaintiff for Judomen ey against the Defendant by default finals And it appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed and vurmons issued in this action on the 25th day of Janaury, 1955: a i firth ; + + j é and it further appearing to the Court that the said Summons, together wit! g itt a con yf i fe: j a copy of said Complaint, were served on the Defendant on the 24th day of January, 1655: And it furthe j ’ runer appearing to the Court that no Answer, Demurrer, or other pleading has been filed hy ¢ e ; iled bv the Defendant, and no extension of time to file leading b ran P 38 has been granted, and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired: appearing to the Court from th And it further vher she verified Complaint that she caus - ~ Ac Ai act] oY con i 5 ge! € Cc a i -© S st x Ot he Ore ac 1 Ol an \ xprY es S : r Ot money Lixe d 7 G e nr +r £ . ’ I ATT [ RE m mR he contract, to wit: the sum of SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOUR iNT 1/10 th AND 19/100 ($481.19) DOLLARS® with interest thereon from the 2ith day of vanuary, 1955, until paid at the rate of six (6) per cent; And’ 4t further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that . Plaintiff claims the right to the possession of one 1948 Willys truck, eepster § ion W j pster Station Wagon), motor number U63043, serial number 62553, in order that i } - 1t may sell the same as provided in a certain chattel mortgage executed by the Defendant on September 4, 1954 ’ 2 duly recorded in CHattel Mortgage Book d+, at page 14, Iredell County gs nestistry, and that ancillary to this action the P aintiff Causéd + } . mre oe issued Claim and Delivery papers for said property and now has same in its possess} § Ssions: NOw, THEREFORS i ha ind na, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintif! ve and recover of 0/10 of the Defendant the sum of SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOUR AND 19/100 ($681.10) DOLLARS 1955: that wit : With interest thereon from the 2h4th day of January, the Personal pro Perty above describ eg 9 : jon for cash, ed be sold at public auctioms to the’ hiche is Enest bi . : ike ke enue ‘dder at said Sale, after posting notice of said Ovided in '@. Pa ; C+ Te ae 1-339.18, at the Courthouse door in vtatesville N - Je I» s U 2 J > "9 orth Caroli aw . na, and to th jssion® uu “nat end M, L N . ted Comm is L. Nash, is appointe + on ‘© sell the Same a of the Court and directed t S hereinabove provided, and cred! the amount . nt received + ' d theref etal! ne .2 + Slime a » +888 the legal cost of said sale, upon the mon ORGCred? and tha t the Plaintirr t the st ‘ , endan Cost of this auction. recover of the Def This 17 day of March, 1955 Me, ee ee ok ok 445076 WORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY SUPERIOk COURT 4, WAUGH AND WIFE, i WAUGH , be PLAINTIFFS VS. CARRIE HOKE KNOX, DEFEN ee ee ee ee ee ee This cause coming on to be heard before the Undersigned Clerk of the - e t + earing to the Court that the superior Court of +redell County, and it app r Plaintiffs and the Defendant have mutually settled all matters and differences r Lllusi 4 F netween themselves and by the terms of said agreement the Defendant has NeUWeoH v 7 Ali _ Title to property belonging to t executed a Deed removing the cloud from the the Plaintiffs. It is therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND non-suited and dismissed. It is ordered that the Plaintiffs ” m+ +} ze OM1IUN ny »} , TAr4 r’ inet sh Or ouperior LOUuUrt #576 NORTH CAROLINA TOONTT OOINTY IREDELL COUNTY. oe Ae bACtse, Piast , fn rFiaintl a) VSe Henry S. Setzer end wife, JUDGMENT OF tthel Setzer, and Susie L. Stamey, ee ee a ee ee ee eee Defendants. This cause being heard before the Honorable C. Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted by the issuance of Summons on October 14, 1954: that service of Summons and the Complaint were served in apt time on all the Defendants; that thereafter, an Answer was filed by the Defendant, Susie L. Stamey, but no pleadings have been filed by the Defendants, Henry S. Setzer and wife, Ethel Setzer; that it further appearing to the Court from the statement of the parties and counsel for the Plaintiff, that all the matters and things arising upon the pleadings have been Settled: that under the terms of the settlement, the Plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non-suit and recover his Court costs from the Defendants, and the Court ‘inds a8 a fact, that the Plaintiff is entitled to take a voluntary non-suit. IT Is, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, That the Plaintiff be, and he 4 . i “Ss Permitted to take a voluntary non-suit: that the Defendants be taxed with the Co : StS, said cost having been reimbursed to plaintiff. Signed and entered in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredelt County on March 30, 1955, C. Ge Smith C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina Kk kk kw Ke ke we we Ke eK Carolina State Highway and Norks Commission, PlaintiftT, ORDER DISSOLVING RESTRAINING ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Defendant. ) coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor, } Frank M. Armstrong, Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, and heineg hy consent of the parties heard and signed out of County, North Carolina, one of the counties composing the Fifteenth . and it appearing to the court from the statement of Battlev, Attornevs for the plaintiff, and Adams, Dearman and Attorneys for the defendant: That the defendant and his wife have executed a right of way agree- 1a ry he plaintiff for the road improvement program to in the Complaint, same being dated February 21, 1955, and the plaintiff has settled with the defendant for the right of wav and the damages arising to him and his land by reason of the road improvement program referred to in the Complaint: nd that all matters and things referred to in the Complaint have been ++ 7 } i + 3 Settieda and compromised. «. That the Temporary Restraining Order entered in this action on February 22 de dissolved and terminated. is to be nonsuited and taxed with the cost. , Upon motion of the attornevs for the plaintiff, and f the att attornevs for the defendant, ORDERED, ie T at : | hat emporary nheStraining Order entered on February foo 195) and the gs is here} i - he same is hereby dissolved and terminated. 2. That thi j oF hat this action be ! , On de, and the same is hereby nonsuited and UaRe” and the plaintiff taxed with the cost This the 26th a f Fe) + day o reoruary, 1955 Frank M, ArmStronmg ee Resident Judge of the Fifteenth o Judicial District vOonsented to hv: MCLAUGHLIN & BATTLEY ATTORNEYS FOR THE PLAINTIRE BY: ew Meta ots Member of Firm ADAMS, DEARMAN & wry DAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERR ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEFENDS tr PG. Be Winberry Member of Firm ma 5892. Ae vogta CAROLINA ao BEFORE THE CLERK TREDELL COUN as it » & Je DISCOUNT COMPANY, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PLAINTIFF t VS. rt HAHN J, HAHN, DEFENDANT This cause coming on to he heard and being heard before the “lerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it court from the statement of SCOTT, COLLIER & NASH, ATTORNEYS LAINTIFF, that er in controversy has been settled between roaAiNi a" seis and that th intiff has elected to take a voluntary thereto, its action? ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that a See it is hereby Non-suited. THIS 5th DAY OF APRIL, 1955. . AANQ PNT i VUNOGINI & J. DISCOUNT Je VLIOUUUN svOTT, COLLIER & DEFENDANT ) Thi ‘ a.) * : a > wWwNnde i¢ +¢ this cause coming on to be heard, and being heard befors 1e undersigned clerk rk of Superior Court of 4 ; . " : 3 3+ nNpe "ing to tne Iredell Countv, North Carolina, and it appearing UO ne LOUrt fram inne. rks. mts TAINTIFF ‘rom the statement of SCOTT, COLLIER & NASH, ATTORNEYS FOR [nb PLAIN! IFF, that the fan + . . te t ® Defendant has paid the two past due installments on the note as se Pe 1 Orth Tt) in + " , : 9 : 46 “nthe Complaint plus the Court Costs advanced by the Plaintiff in this act3 on . » 4nd has arranged to pay the balance of the indebtedness now due, and that the Plaintire ; iia a “Ntiff has elected to take a voluntary Non-Suit in its action; IT IS THEREFORE ey ‘ | 1S THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the Plaintiff be and it Nerehy Non-Suited, THe HIS 5th pay OF APRIL, 1955, C. Ge Smith ON Clerk superior Court a sekray TO: sean,’ DISCOUNT compan COM, COLL TER. COMPANY : & NASH, ATTORNEYS SeeMiah ee kkheR Kk Re ee me ee eH KK * —e 2 SS wes heard, and being heard before the undersi ene: il County, North Carolina, and it appearing ty r COLTLTR thay ATTODNEVa 1 i [, COLLIER & NASH ORNEYS FOR THR the two past due installments On the nots Court costs advanced hy the Pla} ha? - Ind + balance f ! ndehtedness 1 wh nan D ww DECREED A5abE oi ORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNT? statesville Theather Corporati Plaintiff, Defendant This eause coming on to he neard + ‘ hea T+h ea a his the, wh day o far the recovery YT r the Defendant Plaintiff: it further appears summons and Complaint were served on the Defendant or 5., and that he : ee ntitled to Judemer ONneD pn AN TTINCENH awn hy 1 ‘+, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECKEED Fendant $m the amount? intil paid, and that the Defendant Aas oe MALE JAROLINA ANSDELL COUNTY A vde Boan, portation Company, Defendant This ¢ ~ thd Sas m4 Se coming on to be heard before the under-signed Clerk of Su » and it appearing to the Court that this action is brought by Plainti / or an unpaid balance of SIX HUNDRED AND 96/100 DOLLARS, Vefendant owes to the Plaintiff: 4 Purthe s ver appears to the Court that the Summons and Complaint was lved veqg on the Def endant on February 18th, 1955, and that the Defendant has failed answer ii or Other $ “ ‘Fwise plead in this cause. ar Is THERB PANT rime EFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff recover of Defeng “"dant the ‘ Sum of BF L : » m ¢ : or 9600.96, with interest from January 1, 1955, until paid, and + chat the Defendant ‘ ? ; e taxed with the cost of this action. Thi , 8 the th day of April, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court mM om me me ok ok oe me ome oe h sum as may he recovered against the defendant for the value : ‘ nc ut : pe paid § SUPRRTOR ann $ -he wrongful taking or detention, wit} UPERTOR COURT yi property at the time of the % , : ‘ v h of tne as damages, for such taking and detention, together with L Discounty Company, F = snterest thereon, laint3 $ . Lair ne walle of this action:" tne } , ° ryt 1 5 £5 nY 5 a ind it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint and Puiomaiak <i os E : : - ha the plaintiff is entitled to a monetary 1 | ! rit} : : unit of claim and delivery that t ple A and Hay Chapman, additional defendant Wrsh © tat OKs. % i reer \. £ A ~ 1} ia < & nal Vvetendant as suretv on defendant's undertakings all ca prayed for in its complaint and to the possession of the said syqemen i, . : - “ h r : aoe ' ee . a 7 ay that it might sell the same as by law provided and cred er h it property in ord ‘ z on to be heard before the Honorable C. | 3m 4 aru 27 UNe nonoy e Ate mi AT aul , ° Me OmIth, Cleri he amount received, less the legal costs of said sale, upon the monetary the amount , yal Tredel] ne CS Intv nn Itinn hry r\) ; ‘ vountyv, upon motion by the plaintiff throyeh judgment $ & Naet far ave + : ites oe ures © Nash, _ agement against the defendant hy Now, Therefore, it is ordered, adiudged and decreed: lst That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant H. w. Griffith ve ais : urt that a veri fi ed complaint ; 2 Tir Ana s h s + tk 1’) LUTINDOE INT AN ) * { AR Jit 7 > st 2reon the sum of TWO HUNDRED ONE AND #1,/100 ($201.84) DOLLARS,with interest thereor the llth day of trom the 27th dav of July, 1954, and the costs of this action. the torether with a ‘ i i f and. That the plaintiff be and is entitled to possession o defendant + fH SZ +h ” : ndant h on the 17th day A M 10,0 Studehaker 3/L ton truck, Serial No. 2926836A, Motor which defendart H. W. Griffith is hereby ordered to release and deliver to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other said plaintiff. vy the defendants and no extension of time to file inti 3rd. That upon recovery of said property the plaintiff be and and that the time within which pleadings may be ) Aved . allowed to sell the same as by law provided and credit the amount received, less the legal costs of said sale,uwpon the monetary judgment herein rendered. to the court ¢ + verified con Our rom he Tey 1ed comfy beh i oe : ' a= x + tho plaintiff cannot he kth. That in case a deliverv of the property to the plaint ar ; breach of an express contract to had, plaintiff be entitled to the valve thereof, to wit: the sum of TWO namely, the sum of “UNDRED FIFTY ($250.00) DOLLARS® and damages for the detention. Satan sane a eee D intereet thereon from July m . ny am a sth. That the plaintiff recover of defendant Ray Chapman the sum o appearines to the court fram the verified defendant's undertaking, or’ replevy bond, to wit: the sun of FIVE HUNDRED right to the *« i i . \ rY POSsSseSsSsio ¢ e O1,9 NAT tT Ana : aha t nm. © one (1) 194¢ DOLLARS ($500.00) ee he discharced: » 9erial N 2OQARVE : ‘ ; ate a ° =i Motor No. 2Rewxehi 5 R-15 0050! hy 4 L i ~y WILL 9 wy t 1 ees a Jpon the +99 + th vavment of the damages and chattel mortgage, dated July ea - Up he return of the property and the paymen og «a i, executed by defendant to Auto Parts Wane and Electric ¢ end aut “StS recovered by the plaintiff, or, C Stu Guiv transferred ana assigned to plaintiff securing the note referr 5 to ine mol int ee ” I a retu nm. © she pr oper ty cannot . 7 ies'p ae: a | e -OMpPLlain hat ne} + action i oO c mr mav eS ft | t nt, and that ancillarv to his 6 tne aintii Plaintife + h me ti an = | he pl rAalNtl] f $s) h sun as ma he ecovered a rains , UNE snaanv i , value ; -iaim and ie] ivery papers or said prope rs i, And it further ‘ , rey a Operty at the time of its wron ul taking an : = 8 gh Uli A appearing f ) - + a : rom the writ o claim and delivery tha 5 Property was the 1 uy t AT * wm Of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY ($250.00) DOLLARS, together with the costs the action, declared hy plaintire to hea worth the "g \e h t in > worth the sum of $250.00; tnat order that the property as ve) the total recovery against the surety in no event, however, = ‘nr “rom defendant H. W. Griffith by the Sheriff of exceed th Caldwell County he Svbnnedvan © penalty of the bond. ie hie , defendants H. W. Griff Chapman A its H. W. Griffith and hay e executed defendant's undertak} f 195L “Ms the 6 day of April, 1955. : noe or replevy on th 17 4 f N vember Yh , 7 a in the Sum of FIVE rrear Ne th Gay o OVER : i E HUND : Co Oy. epi tn and which bond provided by 1% Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County. RED ($500.00) DOLLARS fT, ' e : terms, "that if the said broperty h Perty be returned to the defendant it shall be delive rwered to the plaintite. yds Pea ee a ee l » With damages fo ' n together with r its deterioration and detentio™ the eo ts of the Ction 7 - Ss i ‘ ; - a j al , i e had, and if such delivery be adjudged and can be shall if Such deliy me tivery Canno for ¢ . ‘y Cause be had, that the plaintiff twocO°O 5883 = NORTH CAROLINA p ) P AI209 INA IREDELL COUNTY NORTH © : UNTY Motor Company, A Se Coover jes! Loan and Savings Bank, peopses an Plaintiff vs . nett & schafer and Mrs. «were C te : . tennte Be ohaver harren, Defendants undersigned Clerk of Si +o he heard before the undersigned Werjor This cause appearing to the Court that $+ anr the Court that the parties have made adjustments ne 1% appe : ; , ‘ourt, and Lf ) \ v4 P oO Octoner 195/ y tha bs : : : ; A4Ssmi CUO is £794,ant nat oummons tween themselves § sire now ¢t . mn aisr hetwee! n © vs on November 3rd, 1°54: that more thar rvice and Defendant has failed to Defendant is indebted to the AND 30/100 DOLLARS, ($202.30). 2aintiff recover interest from October 9) the cost of this action NORTH CAROLINA a ’ ae Omit _— I Clerk Superior Court. AATIAIM YW IREDELL COUNTY Wrlia Mae Thomas, 7 In the Superior Court Thee . nis cause coming on to be heard and ing heard before + G Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County upon Motion , JUDGMENT “on Plaintiff that this cause he transferred to Alexander County for Defendant nana ; : . , ste divorce and that appearing to the Court that this is an action for absolute divorce and thas Cause coming ra : ' : the a . j ee eard, and being heard before the undersigne ne defendant has not been personally served with summons but was served superior Uonr+e ar 1 . : nih] ¢ , the cour ©" Iredell County, N rth Carolina, and it appearing ‘ publication; ~ the court fr or the State ‘ 2 ” ‘ i Ole men 0 ’ i ry . ed . T+ es Ae , . 1 1 scott, Collier and Nash, Attorneys for the *U iS, therefore, ordered that this cause be, rPlaintift¢t ak . ‘aintiff, that the defendant nd the same has paid the #1] F indebtedness dv? *0 the Superior Court | C ll amount of the indebte lor Court of Alexander County for trial. Plaintiff as set Ff, : ¢ ‘ ‘ orth in the . : Le +4 / ne complaint herein and the court costs of this ‘his the 30th day of March, 1955. action a + — 2 : » and tha nN consideration n the , C. Ge. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of said payment the automobile claimed } writ of claim . r, and deli, >yY . “TY, ancillary to this action, was returned to said Plaintiff hy the Sheri re = . Jil . ner 0 x this oranly County, and that plaintiff has requested CNIS action h Same , y éE nN ed Smissed hy reason of said a ttl As Settlement? It is there | tnererore bey the » Ordered, Adiudeed and Decreed that this action be ant * Same is herehy dismissea This the R+h th dav of April, 1055 Consented to: Clerk Superior Cour Re & Jd, Dino tn . LOVOunt Com a : n . Jany , ; : weort, Pollier & ash Miuemattt? . VW lievs Me ln Nia tt * Oe & 8 ok we ge IN THE SUPERIOR COURT #5981 E SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA 1REDELL COUNTY Funeral Home, HC, vicholson CONSENT JUDGMENT ; Plaintiff 3 4 Ss fendants VSe urs, Jettie L. Ritchie and R. sil anitd? to be heard and being heard before the undersiene, a ee ee ee ee ee I Defendants Iredell County and it heing made to appear to 4 hereto have arreed to ad ; IST, con promise and Satt), i : nae coming on +O hea heard hefore the undersigned Clerk of controversy hetween them hy the pavment by the 4 Superior Court on this, the 14th dav of April, 1955. and it appears to the : ; WE . iper] Irv } of Seven Hundred Fifty ($750.00) Court rhat this action was instituted on March 226h. 1955, and that Summons adjust ment ‘ compron ise and settlement of and Complaint were sorved on the Defendants on the Lhth dav of March, controversy between the parties as appears from the f it further appears to the Court that the action is for the recovery of a stated account due hy the Defendants to the Plaintiff in the amount of Z FOUR HUNDRED NINETY SEVEN AND 50/100 DOLLARS, with interest from November 26, seven Hundred Fi $750.00) f 1052, ($407.50): of all matters a: ing And it further appears to the Court that the Defendants have pears from ta dings i f answer or otherwise plead in this cause. & ORDERED, ADJUDGE ND DECREED that the Plaintiff recover a Se f of the Defendants the sm of $497.50, with in st from November 26, 1952, and that the Defendants be taxed with the cost of this action. rn ry Y : + C. G. oI > 7 (Vass vy ' : iperior Court of Iredell County G. Smith Ue } : 7 Clerk Superior Court £2 eS ; x nee Attorney for Plaintirr Smathe re Somat Maa es . ee a oo = rnow > -— K orney or Defendants No. 583g NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiffs Agfainst SUMMONS FoR h Annie McKee, single, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Wilev McKee, and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A. McKee, being all of the children, their husbands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County North Carolina. RELIEF ee Defendants. NORTH CAROLINA: Ad iff of Iredell Countv--Greetine: a tax foreclosure proceeding HEREBY COMMANDED TO criywon a : ‘AW 3 phi : ss ; ( COMMANDED TO SUMMON Annie McKee rle, Vivian McKee Wilson and husb nc hy Ws tr MAY ‘ we and, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Wiley McKee, and all other persons Claiming anv intereet jin th anc ; ; i est in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell Couty, North i : - %. ) o } + } : NOrtn sarolina thea defendan S arove named, $f to he found within your county, tO appear id file : wi a a. ; “ e a PP and file a written answer to the complaint with the Clerk of the Superior Court fF Y f > 7 a. wwe « ee : . . a : : : or Iredell County at his office in the Courthouse in Statesville, « Co, within thirt + , ’ nin hirty days after date of service of this summons. A copy of e mr ; $ « +o the complaint is hereto attached. Let the said defendants take notice that 1! they fai + . m Th Mey ail to #47 RTP TON NQwE ‘ s ; ie WRITTEN ANSWER to the said complaint or otherwise plead within the time required hy law y law, the plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief dem i 3 , demanded in the complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make dve return, Given under my h;: . nand and seal of said court, this 25 day of Aug., 15h Attorney for Plai mh ffs Name __ Baxter a G. Smith aah. 8. Ce S+ CLERK SUPERIOR COURT. CERTIFICATE OF RECEIPT OF SUMMONS BY SHERIFF Received in office of S r4 “heriff of Iredell County N. Carolina, this the 25th day August, 1951, . C. Rumple Sheriff T vu al OFFICERS RETURN OF SUMMONS 1954. Served by delivering a copy of the within summons, neceived Aus. 2). : , Complaint to the follwoing named defendants on the th a copy of together Wi dates shown opposite their names: 1. McKee on the 30 day of August, 1954 anni e , ' yyian McKee Wilson on the 30 day of August, 1954. f Aueust, 1954 Yeo McKee on the 30 day o : 5 y of August, 1lO5L. rred Wilson on the 31 day of Avg o 29S ait Wa WEIR Battlev, County Attorney - authorized asent to receive legal Serve moe er vrocess for Iredell County on the 25th day of August, 1954. c, Rumple, Sheriff Iredell County by San Laws, De Se Je C, Rumple Iredell al B NW. C, Jenkins Fee $12.50 Due B ro Us nkins NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiffs Arvainst Annie McKee, sincle, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Wiley NeKee, and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A. McKee, beine all of the children, their husbands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary ‘ell Blackburn McKee, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Jredell County. North Carolina. ee eee eee Defendants THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA: To the Sheriff of Guildford County--Greeting: his summons is issued in a tax foreclosure proceeding ‘OV ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A. McKee the defendant above named, if to be found within your county, to appear and “ile a written answer to the complaint with the Clerk of the Superior Court ‘or Iredell County at his 6ffice in the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C., within thirty days after date of service of this summons. A Copy of the “omplaint is hereto attached. Let the said defendant take notice that if she ‘ails to file WRITTEN ANSWER to the said complaint or otherwise plead within ‘he time required by law, the plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief dema nded in the complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due vurn, Civen under my hand and seal of said court, this 25 day of Aug., 1954. ‘ame ——Baxter H. Finch Smith ——orenysurenton COURT. SS CERTIFICATE OF RECEIPT OF SUMMONS BY SHERIFF Received in office of Sheriff of Guilford County N. C., this the 13 day of Sept . 195L Je E. Walters Sheriff ect, OFFICERS RETURN OF SUMMONS Received served by delivering a copy of the within summons together of Complaint to the following named defendants On the dates shown cpposi Sheriff County Deputy Sherif? AIADMtY Aar TATA OR] YAROI 1A N THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY YS +a, fF OQ wt 0 hn in ahh iy owe vity of Statesville, a mun pal corporation, Pp Plaint3 Annie VieKee Sintle Ci oe x ne . Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, veo Menee, widow of Wiley McKee and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A, McKee, being all of the children, their husbands and wives of the late Governor McKee and wife “ary Bell Blackhurn McKee, and all other persons Claiming anv interest in the lands described in the Complaint i ne T ¢ J non and Iredell vounty, North Carolina. ; Defendants ine plaintiff, complainine of the defendants, alleces: I That the Plaintiff, City of Statesville, is a municipal corporation organize? existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Carolina and charter, and as such is authorized and empowered to levy taxes and street assessments arainst r : imits, real property located within its boundaries and City Lim and the amount of taxes levied 3 ° ‘ s 4 vor ‘S a prior lien against such property in "” of said plaintiff. II That the defendant Anni ' au County, e McKee is a citizen and resident of Iredell North Carolina, and is unmarrried: : nd that the defendants Vivian McKee Wilson 4 husband, Fred Wilson a aro are citizens and residents of Iredell County, North % that the defendant Veo McKee widow is a citizen and resident of Iredell that the defendant Lucille ilford County, County, North Carolina: ane citise” De , widow, i and resident of Gu ean McKee ’ North Carolina: that the defendants are the pines G 10r McKee and wife, Mary Bel] ie ana heirs-at-law of the late Governor Mc and wife, Ma li i sole © Kee of Iredell County, North Carolina, in whose names the after- ; McKee ©! Blackburn ; ord: iescribed property is listed of rec ae ) III That the defendant Annie McKee is single, never having married, and is a id Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee: that daughter of the sa | a ; eee . nem bhava rhe defendant Vivian McKee Wilson is intermarried with Fred Wilson a a eee late Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee: that the defendant Veo McKee is the widow of the late Wiley McKee who was a son of he late Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee: that to the rarriage between Wiley MeKee and the defendant Veo McKee there were born no children: that the defendant Lucille Dean McKee is the widow of the late John \, McKee who was a son of the late Governor McKee and wife, Marv Bell Blackburn veckees that born to the marriage between John A. McKee and Lucille Dean McKee were no children: that the defendants as hereinabove named are the sole heirs- atelaw of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee; IV That the defendant, Iredell County, is a body politic and corporate, of the State of North Carolina, and as such is authorized and empowered to levy taxes against real or personal property located within its boundaries; that th plaintiff is informed and so believes that the defendants at the time of the filing of this Complaint also are indebted to the said Iredell County for ‘ ntinuine intermittedlv taxes levied by said defendant commencing the year 1928 and continuing in up to the time of the filing of this instrument: V : +3 that have any f there are any other persons, firms, or corporations tha : ; r corporations in the after-described property such persons, firms, or corpora are unknown to this plaintiff: VI M were That the late Governor McKee, and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee, q £ 4 hv J M. teeded one lot or parcel of land on the 8th dav of April, 1907, by John Sharpe and wife, ; ge Cora M. Sharpe, which deed is recorded in Deed Book 35 at pa 9 ‘ " : . ; "5, Iredeli County Registry, said property being situated in Statesville vmship, Iredell County, North Carolina, and more particularly described as “ollows: DESCRIPTION NG Lot No, g in part CG of the Cowles property on Tradd State kan na myeeville, M,C. ss shown on map of said property eae eo Said freee in the office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell eee Lege Tap of the e Green Street and reference is hereby made to the above w les property for a more particular description of said lot. VII That the Tax Collector of the City of Statesville, North Carolina plaintiff herein, in consequence of the nonpayment of certain City of Statesville taxes for the year 1948, which had heen lawfully levied, and vhin ich were a lien upon the real estate hereinbefore fully described in Paragraph 2 VI above, did, on the 12 day of September, 1949, after advertisement in the manner provided by law, offer for sale at public auction at the Courthouse door of Iredell County the real estate described in paragraph VI of this Complaint, when and where the plaintiff became the last and highest bidder , and the purchaser of said real estate for the sum of SIX DOLLARS AND ETGHTY. ONE CENTS (346.81), said sum including the above-mentioned taxes, including APY A 4 Py 4 SEVENTY CENTS (70¢) Tax Collector's cost: that the plaintiff is entitled to recover interest on s said sum at the rate of 6% per annum for one vear from the date of the certificate hereinafter set forth, and at the rate of 6% , 4 Tonk + f per annum thereafter until paid; that thereupon a certificate of sale for property was delivered to the plaintiff, which tax sale certificate is now in the possession of and owned by the City of Statesville, plaintiff herein, said Sales certificate heing recorded in the sales certificate book in the office of the City Clerk and Treasurer and Tax Collector, reference to i is hie} tc arah vr ; ’ which is hereby made, and is asked that same be taken as a part of this paragraph as if fully set out herein; that the same is still outstanding na iwuHnYre- 3 a BS : a SAe and unredeemed, and the indebtedness evidenced by same has not been paid; that the said ceri ficate is oO in words and figures as set out in the afore- said sales certificate, and more particularly as follows: CERTIFICATE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE FOR TAXES NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY vente Be GUY, Clerk and Treasurer of the City of Statesville, se certify that the tax lien on the following described re property in Said taxine unti, to-wit: sl ~overnor McKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee (Name of taxpayer in which property was listed) / in Statesville, (TESTI | Tewnanty was arene — aap opti Seavert igtis an y me in the manner provided by law, for the quent taxes for the year 1948 amounting to Six and 11 -100 dollars ($6.11) pe ty oe S provided by law when and where and cost to be added a City of Statesville —_— of Purchaser) r said amonery at the price of Six and 81 -100 dollars ($6-81) further certites be highest and best bid for same. And l within the t4 thaténless payment of said Lien is made whose name re and the manner provided by law, said purchaser the right eens Siven, his heirs, or assigns, shall have allowed bY law *Ciose said real propaty by any proceeding purchased said lien on said IN WITNESS WHEREO F day of Septemh , geen, ere his er, 1919, unto set my hand, t A. E. GUY CITY CLERK AND TREASURER VIII aes abatavit® during she year 1939 ‘paved and hard surfaced a side- a , F i South C ing alongside and adjacent to the property aforesaid on South Green walk runnins " ing the value of the property aforesaid and under and pursuant to : Vv 4 f the charter of the City of Statesville and the General Statutes of rhe terms © ' f North Carolina appertaining to sidewalk assessments by municipalities the State 0 : r int its said property was assessed for ;cularly this plaintiff, the defendant r and partl sularly t oO ; ~yine to them and the property hereinabove described and were enecial benefits accruing to LAS spe 5 ; ; £ EFTAUTREN WW Ana d with said sidewalk assessments in the principal sum of EIGHTEEN DOLLARS assesse , ’ np 75/100 DOLLARS (318.75) which assessment appears of record in the office of the City Clerk and Treasurer and Tax Collector for the City of Statesville, vorth Carolina, in the City Hall in Statesville, North Carolina, in the sidewalk assessment. book or record in said office; that the interest and penalties on said assessment to date total SEVENTEEN AND 08/100 DOLLARS ($17.08), making a erand total for sidewalk assessment in the sum of THIRTY-FIVE AND 83/100 DOLLARS ($35.83), said sidewalk assessment now constituting a lien against said proper*ys IX That the plaintiff during the year 1942 paved and hard surfaced a street running alongside and adjacent to the property aforesaid, namely South Green Street, improving the value of the property aforesaid and under and pursuant to the terms of the charter of the City of Statesville and the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina appertaining to street assessments by mur icipalities and particularly this plaintiff, the defendants, said property was assessed for special benefits accruing to them and the property hereinabove described and were *Ssessed with said street. assessments in the principal sum of ELEVEN DOLLAKS $11.00) which assessment appears of record in the office of the City Clerk and ‘veasurer and Tax Collector for the City of Statesville, North Carolina, in the u , ; h record Hall in ‘tatesville, North Carolina, in the street assessment book or recor ‘" Said offices City that the interest and penalties on said assessment to date total “THT AND 34/100 DOLLARS ($8.34), making a grand total for street assessment in “he sum of NINETEEN AND 34/100 DOLLARS ($19.34), said street assessment now "Onstitut4 : : ituting-a lien against said property; X That the plaintirr during the year 1950 paved and hard surfaced a street Tunni i . “MS alongside and adjacent. to the property aforesaid, namely Bast Sharpe str Set, improv: ng the value of the property aforesaid and under and pursuant to the ¢ ' : “m8 of the charter of the City of Statesville and the General Statutes of the § : ; . ‘ate Of North Carolina appertaining to street assessments by minicipalities an Partioy) ssed for “arly this plaintiff, the defendants said property was asse SPecig re * benefits accruing to them and the property hereinabove described and we SSagg ‘s - "with said Street assessment in the principal sum of TWO RUNDRED FORTY NINE 4 ice ND 15/100 DOLLARS ($249.15) which assessment appears of record in the off of the City Clerk and Treasurer and Tax Collector for the City of Statesyi}), f t) it, . North Carolina, in the City Hall in Statesville, North Carolina, in the strec, assessment book or record in said office: that the interest and Penalties on said assessment to date total FIFTY-FIVE AND 37/100 DOLLARS ($55.37), making grand total of THREE HUNDRED FOUR AND 62/100 DOLLARS ($304.62) for street assessment, said street assessment now constituting a lien arzainst Said property. aootool!l sue “ -\ ray, XI That subsequent to the tax lien hereinabove specifically Set out for the J9L8 taxes, interest and penalty, advertising and costs, as aforesaid, the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff for subsequent taxes levied by the plaintiff for subsequent taxes levied hv the plaintiff arainst the defendants! property and said taxes have hecome also liens on the same property in favor of the plaintiff for the vears 1949 through 1953 inclusive, the principal taxes 4 ations with interest and penalties, advertising, and cests total FORTY DOLLARS > O00): that the total taxes now due the plaintiff which have been lawfully -vied and which constitute a lien upon the real estate aforesaid from 1948 through 1953 amounts to FORTY-SIX AND #1/100 DOLLARS ($46.81): that the total amount due the plaintiff bv the defendants by reason of the street assessments S 1 dewalk assessment aforesaid total THREE HUNDRED FORTY and 45/100 ($340.15), making a grand total dve to the plaintiff by the defendants of THREE HUNDRED SIGHTY-SEVEN AND ID 26/100 DOLLARS ($387.24): XII That the defendants also are indebted to the City of Statesville, Plainti? herein, for the 195), taxes and interest thereon, which taxes have been levied but have not as vet been sold as required by law and thus have not yet become 4 lien against said property; that these taxes, however, and future taxes will become due, will he levied and become a lien on said property in favor of the plaintiff WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays judgement against Annie McKee, single, Vi i f Ji le e T™ - ‘ . : kee vian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Wiley Menee, and Lucille Dean McKee widow of John A McKee, bee all of the children, their husbands and wives, of the late Go n vernor McKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackbur McKee, and al] other persons ri in claiming any interest in the lands described the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina: 1. For the tot Plaintiff, determined, h al amount of taxes adjudged to be liens in favor of t other than tax fi €s the amount of which has not been " interest, penalties and costs thereon} e nitell together with For the f Creclosure of + Complaint ee the tax sale certificate described in arainst cane Pw Other tax liens now duly held by the plaintiff Liew upon the real eseg,a7 that the judement be declared a al - oJ ; a 4 ea e . m ‘ - 0 Ba hereinbefore set out and scribed in the certificate ; “vil of the Compalint: 8S particularly described in paragraph i be directed to advertise and , 1er be appointed and be dir Oo adv ; That 4 ce described in paragraph VI of this Vomplaint sell the eee provided by law, and to apply the proceeds of sale to 6 Segment of said judgment; s of this action, and for such other and further relief For the ataeLrt may be in law and equity entitled to receive. as the p ; 7 Baxter H. Finch Attorney for the Plaintiff 0RTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IREDELL COUN _. rn j j by jJeposes @ GUY. after being duly sworn in the manner provided | law, depos A. Bs 48 + hw > m . C for the City of that he is the City Clerk and Treasurer-Tax Collector fo he Cit and Sajyay eee es *Y ; eer : itv to make this certification- C ina: e has the anthorit ; i North Carolina: that h Statesville, Nort 3 e 3 na WwW the j ced Compalint and knows t the foregoing and annexed iff son: that he has read the , verification; t m j de xcept as to those j of his own knowledge, ex f: that the same is true contents thereof: t! in j belief nd as to ters and things therein stated upon information and belief, a matte cning tne ] he believes it to be true. Ay Se Wry " ra 7 Collector Treasurer-lax Colle City of Statesville, North Carolina sworn to and subscribed hefore me, this the 25 day of Aue, 195L. C. G. Smith vlerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County IREDELL COUNTY ity of Statesville. a municipal corporation, Plaintiff, vs annie McKee, sincle Vivian McKee i WE n tle, icKee ISWER 7t80n and husband, Fred Wilson, r nd Wont? Widow of Wiley McKee, and Vivian McKee, widow of John A, McKee, being all of the children, their husbands and wives, of the late “overnor McKee an Black d wife, Mary Bell wyeekburn McKee, and all other persons juiting any int densa n erest in the lands cribed in the Compalint, and “edell County, North Carolin, Defendants, : ing Iredell County, one of the defendants in this action, answeri Complaint filed herein, says: I NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Paragraph 1 of the complaint is admitted, II city of Statesville, a : D . . > j Parasraph 2 of the complaint is notMenied. municipal corporation, III Plaintiff ! That Paragraph 3 of the complaint is presumed to be true and is not d VS enied, Vivian McKee { ad nie McKee, single, Vivian tic MOTION jij1son and husband, —. _ ~ pry Seek 2S That Paragraph h of the complaint is admitted. i s oa ;dow of Wilev McKee, q ne co se it it being af i Veo McKee, W) 7 ‘ . firmatively an Vivian McKee, widow or Ae alleged that the land descrihed in the 4t : haing all of the children, in t +h paragraph of the complaint is Sub sect See giants and wives, of the late ; iH to taxes for the vears 1928 1931 1932 1937 1930 1OL0 oO ne McKee and wife Marv Bell rune yea + 1¢ 1937 9 I, 9 vernor Mcre : se, ’ ’ , » 1939, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1943. 194, a aeybere McKee, and al] other persons | iy 1945, 1947, 195L, inclusive in the total amount of $157.27 as of the bof claiming anv interest in the lands ita S of the month o! described in the Complaint, and ; | } - _ ") : eran j 4 thle August, 1954, as more fully appears upon the tax records of Iredell County in the Inegens emunty, North Caroline, i é } h : Wigs et office of the tax collector. Defendants it Hee ' He V NOW COMES City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, plaintiff in a a wt © VOUT. J a = Wy " | : 4 : mto th Th that Paragraph the complaint is admitted. the above-entitled action and respectfully shows unto the VI That it filed its Summons and Complaint in this action on the 25th day That Paragraph 6 of the complaint is admitted. of August, 19543 VII That in the drafting of said Summons and Complain* a certain mistake was di he , That Paracrar ; ‘ i intif ssires to correct by anamondment to said Summons lat Paragraph 7 of the complaint is admitted, made which the plaintiff now desir VITI and Complaint, said mistake being as follows: One of the defendants named in the Summons and Complaint was "Vivian McKee" widow of John A. McKee: that the correct name for this person should be and is Lucille Dean McKee: complaint is admitted, IX , ' ca er . . : 1 f co ting that Paragraph © of the That this Motion is made in good faith and for the purpose of correctin® complaint is admitted, he ige e x the pleadings as aforesaid and for no other purpose. That Paragraph 10 of the WHEREFORE, plaintiff moves the Court that an order issue allowing an compalint is admitted. XI amendment to the Summons and Compalint herein as in the manner and for the That Paracrs e d Purpose above t out ‘raph 11 of the complaint is admitted. oe XII This the 10th day of September, 195k. ‘hat Paracr ‘os aph 12 of the : ; s he complaint is admitted. Baxter H. Finch WHEREFORE. hav} * ; f the Plaintiff y evens fully answered, the County of Iredell prays that if the Attorney for Court decrees a Sale of 5 - » 3 + A fron aid land that the County of Iredell have and recover ° the proceeds of . 7CSSGE Said her Sale the amount of taxes due on said debt and for such oth and further relief as may he Just and proper. W. R. Battley Tredel) Attorney for County of Ire NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Ernest H. Trout ; oman, after 3 t 1@ rst beine says: tha tie ; duly sworn, deposes and Say the Tax Collect reaector for the Count ‘y of Irede ead the foregoing Answer edell and that he has r and know " S that the contents thereof are true to his own know ledge except th p vnNOse d pelie! matters a . nd things stated therein upon information 4m a " n as 4 , me P - Sworn to and sub this 15th da anaes before ¥ Of me, i : Pe tober, 195k. : hing >On : nOvary Public My commission expires NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY n City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, A . h nNnie Any Be W1iS OF Veo McKee iT and McKee, Vivian McKee Plaintiff Neke sno} Vivi MeKe McKee, single, Vivian McKee and husband, Fred Wilson, widow of Wiley McKee , , widow of John A. , being all of the children, a he ge : ee their husbands and wives, of the late a Governor McKee and wife, Mary Rell ° Blackburn McKee, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described Iredell in the Complaint, and County, North Carolina, Defendants coming on te be heard and being heard on a Motion by the ge Court and the Court finding as a fact that the hes amendment prayed for in its Motion heretofore the exercise of its discretion being of the opinion should be eranted: ordered that the plaintiff be and it is hereby allowed to amendment kine from the said Summons and Complaint the ; ies lan McKee and inserting S in lieu thereof the name Lucille Dean Meke my This the 10th d ay of september, 1954. Ce Us Omit Clerk of the Superior Court le an amendment to the Summons and Complaint here- WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY a municipal Corporation, Plaintiff city of Statesvi lle, in V Ss _ innie McKee, sinzle, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow © wie MeKee, and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of 4 John A. McKee, being all of the children, their husbands and wives of the late Governor McKee ) and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands } described in the Comptaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendants } 10 THE HONORABLE C. G. SMITH, Clerk of the Superir Court: The undersigned, R. A. Hedrick, heretofore appointed Commissioner for the sale of the land described in the Peti the Court the following: I That acting under said order and after due advertisemen hv law and the terms of said order, he offered the land described Petition for sale at public auction for cash at the door of the Courthouse in Statesville, North Carolina, at noon on the 26th day of November, 1951, when and where Isaac T. Avery, Jr. became the last and highest bidder in the sum of $ 675.00. II That your Commissioner verily believes that said price is fair and adequate and is as much as he could reasonably expect to receive from the Sale of said land. WHEREFORE, your Commissioner respectfully recommends to the Court that if no advance bid be made within ten days as by law allowed said sale be approved and confirmed, mL s This the 26th day of November, 195k. R. As Hedrick Commissioner NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal corporation Plaintiff voc vee ASSIGNMENT OF BID Annie McKee, single, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, et al. Defendants transfer set over, and convey to C. C. Foster and his Foster, my on hid in the sale of the above entitled matter, neean whereof Nese wn, ° have hereunto set my hand and seal, this 7th day 10Cc} Isaac T. Averv, Isaac T. Avery, IN THE SUPERIOR unicipal Corporation, Plaintiff McKee, single, Vivian McKee Wilson and hvsband, ilson. Veo McKee wi 14 Mek Yilson, Yeo McKee, widow of'Wilev MeKee, and widow of John A. McKee, being the children, their husbands and wives of the iovernor MeKee and wife, Marv Bell Blackburn McKee, and thor yr "anne a) +mian-e ; ; i ‘toe Sons Claiming any interest in the lands described| ne Complaint, and Iredell] Countv, North Carolina rolina, Defendants } Dean Mekee This proceeding coming on to be heard upon the report of R. A. Hedrick Commissioner, and it appearing to the Court that on the 26th day of November, 1954, said Commissioner reported to the Court a sale at public auction after advertisement as required by law to Isaac T. Avery, Jr., of the land as descrihed in the Petition, at the price of $4675.00: that said report has remained on file for ten days and no advance bid has been made and no objection offered to Said sale; and that in said report said Commissioner recommended that the said Sale he confirmed: and it further appearing “er Court from said report and from proof offered that said price is fair " adequate and that it is for the bst interest of all parties that said sale be confirmed, and that said land he conveyed to Isaac T. Avery, Jre or his ss i ees i ass enees and hi o} est iddey ’ » the last and said Commissioner reconmends that said sale he confirmed: It is now or ; rdered, adiudzed and decreed that the said sale be ond Same is hereby in all re Sper i Pects approved and confirmed and that said Commissioner be and he 18 hereby authorize af i oad directed to execute and u rchaser a f00d and Sufficient receipt by him of 8 liver to the Pp deed for said land upon the aid purchase price: and that the funds so received bY him will Pay over to . the City of St i ae atesville, j lete satis~ Héstion ona sia n full and comp ent of a 11 the taxes, street assessments, and liens due Se ee f $118.42, and that the 110 laintiff, in the mount of % e4 8, ar hat the a Statesville, P city of f Iredell, defendant, any and ae av to the County o » Ge » any anc : ssioner then Pp said Comm es due said County in the amount of $158.15, in full satisfaction all taxes re fe the County of Iredell against said property, and that said and discharge OF UH : t of said proceeding, including Commissioner's er av all the cost Commissioner P .. the amount of 5% of the total purchase price, or $33.75, and the fee, in tne _ ‘ x > 7 + her + fore ‘ e after the payment of the amounts heretofore id purchase pric ; halance of sa forth be paid to the Clerk of the Superior Court, to be held as by set, 1ort : , ' law provided. This 13 dav of December, Qo ~ ‘ $ Ca We OMth erk of the Superior Court ’ $ Ma nit ) r (See Jdg, in Minute Docket 31, HF? Lavontnn IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a mynicipal corporation, Plaintiffs Acainst Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their children, if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, if any, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendants TH CAROLINAS TC THE SHERIFF OF IREDELL COUNTY -- GREETING: This summons is issued in a tax foreclosure proceeding "OU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their children, if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, if any, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell] County, North Carolina, the defendants above named, if to be found within your county, to appear and file a written answer to the complaint mith the Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County at his office in ‘he Courthouse in Statesville, N. C., within thirty days after date of Service of this summons. A copy of the complaint is hereto attached. I “tthe said defendants take notice that if they fail to file WRITTEN ANSWER t ® the said complaint or otherwise plead within the time required by law, the Plaines rr will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Here in fail not, and of this summons make due return. Gi ven under my hand and seal of said court, this 25 day of August, 1954. ‘torney for Plaintiff: Name Baxter H, Finch 2054 3. Center St, Statesville. N.C, Co. G, Smith CERTIFICATE OF RECEIPT OF SUMMONS BY SHERTpP Received in office of Sheriff of Iredell County jn, Carolina, this the 25th q ay of Augrust, 1954. J. C. Rumple Sheriff OFFICERS RETURN OF SUMMONS Received August 25, 1954 Served bv delivering a copy of the within Cc ’ . Summons, together with a copy of Complaint to the following named defendants on the dates shown opposite their names: T im Gaither & wife, Carletto Gaither, their children, if any, their heirs- at--law and assicnees, if any, and all other persons claimine anv interest in the lands described in due Complaint, after due and diligent search and be found in Iredell Countv, N. C. on the 25th day of August, 16%), J.C. Rumple Sheriff Iredell : County Sam Laws (EDELL sity of Statesvill cornorat 3 corporation, e, a municipal Plaintiff Jim Gaither and wife Carletto zaither, their children, if anv SS oe s ‘ : tneir heirs-at-law and assignees if any, and all cther persons Claiming any interest in the lands described in t C int, z : ed in ‘he Complaint, and redell County, North Caroling { ,. Defendants | The plaintiff, complaining of the defendants, alleges: I £ 3 + 4 : ‘ v nized That the plaintiff, City of Statesville, is a municipal corporation or! and existing a : and ne under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Carolina its ch % ) ; ; arter, and as such is authorized and empowered to levy taxes and Stree assessments against real property located wi thin its boundaries and City Limits, and the amount ‘ ty of taxes levied is a prior lien against such proper: . t 2 in favor of said Plaintiff: II That G ‘ an. he defendants Jim Vaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, formerly were citizens and residents of Iredel e415 1 County but that at the time of the lidin Z of this Complaint they ; eir have disappeared and cannot be lbcated and th whereabouts are Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither aad a did have any children or heirs-at-l@"y at so far as the Plaintiff knows p 3ther either Jim Gaither nor Carletto Gai Deputy Chon ft MUY Wl) ie ; a 4. deeded transferred, or sold their interest in the after ; jgned, have a8825 ty and still are the sole owners thereof: that the defendants : roperty , jescribed P : . - ‘ d wife, Carletto Gaither, are listed as of record as the owners of um Gaither an re sim Gaithe ne after-described property; rrr he defendant Tredell County, ia a body politic and corporate, of That the ae i i i ee j gi * : p we e v¢ eVV ¢ N ¥ Carol n and as suc! 18 autnor d and mpo ered 0 ne St, 0 Noy 2th 4 * tne State # ithin its boundaries: that the 1 property located withi ‘net real or persona raxes against i he time of the e that the defendants at the time > is inf d and so believes th lainti nforme olaintiff is 1 | i re m+ Sinan f this Complaint also are indebted tc the said Iredell County fo: filing of tn in . ) ‘ +4 114 <0 ins levied by said defendant commencing the year 194] and continuing up to taxes levi by said def chetime of the filing of this instrument; IV . +0 that fh ° 11 That if there are any other persons, firms, or corporations that have any 3 amo Y rr at j 1S are interest in the after-described property such persons, firms, or corporatior inte dir UMS unknown tO this plaintiff: V j i t els of That the defendant Jim Gaithernwas deeded two lots or parcel — 4 s - 2 } e ert and wife the 19th day of September, 1904, by deed of J. E. Colv , Colvert, which deed is recorded in Deed Boc. 35 at paze 493, Iredell County Resistry, said property is situated in Statesville T ownship, Iredell County, on : cre sisted bv the plaintiff ‘orth Carolina, and was discovered by this plaintiff and listed b A wh 4 roperty is on its books for taxes as of the lst day of Janvarv, 1941, which prop Tore particularly described as follows: DESCRIPTION All of Lots 7 and & in Block C in the North Statesville addition | hs os to Statesville, North Carolina, said lots being 60 by 150 Ths Peg Seats cescribed in plat on file in the office of the Register of Deeds for rec County, North Carolina. (This property being deeded to Jim Gaither in Deed Book 35, Page 493, Iredell County Registry). La a aaa ixcepted from the above-described four lots is a portion OF ohne we deed conveyed by Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, to Sxy eee ae dated the 12th dav of April, 1906, said deed being recorded in oe aaa Page 245 in the office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell ree tte ia tract being a part of No. 7 and & in Block C in the North Statesville Company. This lot is 30 ft. wide by 150 ft. long. VI : 1 roli laintiff That the Tax Collector of the City of Statesville, North Carolina, P herein. ; : Statesville taxes for “2, in consequence of the nonpayment of certain City of States ‘ 4 > real "8 year 1041, which had been lawfully levied, and which were a lien upon the re est : 1 day of “tate hereinbefore fully described in paragraph V above, did, on the 14th day Se ' wi POF sale rember, 1942, after advertisement in the manner provided by law, offe at publ; . tate Public auction at the Courthouse door of Iredell County the real es deserys intiff became ed in Paragraph V of this Complaint, when and where the plainti the last sum and highest, bidder, and the purchaser of said real estate for the of Ty ” aS, TWO AND &8 /100 DOLLARS ($2.68), said sum including the above-mentioned taxe int 's cost; that “et, and penalties including SEVENTY CENTS (70¢) Tax Collector's ah ple in j “f is en j led LC reco 2 i s © said Sum a th LD© a u ver intere . n ] Sum + per annum for one vear from the date of the certificate here} Pate -reinafter Set f orth ’ and at the rate of 6% per annum thereafter until paid: that thereupo 116 j n a certificate of sale for said property was delivered to the plaintiff which ’ Cc tax sale certificate is now in the possession of and owned hv the City of Vo Statesville, plaintiff herein, said sales certificate being recorded in th P. 1 the sales certificate b fain? FHS t : ae ales ¢ rate book in the office of the City Clerk and lreasurer and Tax Collector, reference to which is hereby made, and it is asked that same | , a taken as part of this paragraph as if fullv set out herein: that the Same Standing and unredeemed, and the indebtedness evidenced by same been paid: that the said certificate is in words and figures as set tha aforeacaiaA er $ £3 7 avoresaid sales certificate, and more particularly as follows: CERTIFICATE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE FO! TAXES SOUNTY 4 \ erk and Treasurer of the City of Statesville, oer that the tax lien on the followings described in said taxing unti, to-wit: ae cides Jim Gaither ame of taxpayer in which property was listed) ae re ee + : : ee cts eetegeti ie {ineeees Township was, on the lkth day of September, I‘ Fin tie vane teak ae ee provided by law, for the delinquent taxes caeunee es at a to One and 98 -100 dollars ($1.98) penalty ohieadimeta ttaa as provided by law when and where City of Statesville Pn0 eee Said lien on said real property at the price of Two and 68 See OL are (52.4%) said amount being the hicehest and best bid for Teds witete Gee er tee that unless payment of said lien 73 waka alk bea onsiadiibeen « ime and he manner provided bv law, said c . wnese name is herein siven, his heirs or assigns, shall har th : nave Pm ri oht+ £* - : + rich oreclose said real property by any proceeding allowed by law. to ITNESS IN W 7 1 a 194.2 I have hereunto set my hand, this 14 day of Sept. A. E. GUY CITY CLERK AND TREASURER VII that subsequent to the tax lien hereinabove specifically set out for the nie ae Penalty, advertising and costs, as aforesaid, the qa a - ‘ pent are indebted to the Plaintiff for subsequent taxes levied by the taintiff arains a Sirs ae ray SUe Oncaea Property and said taxes have become also jens ‘ S oe oh She Samm prepare x in favor of the plaintiff for the years 1942 throu AyD) in sj ; tad nen Principal taxes alone with interest and penalties, — 215 g “MSs and costs total FIFTY-SEvEN AND 98/100 DOLLARS ($57998); that the total taxes now due the tute laintif { Plaintiff which have been lawfully levied and which consti real estate aforesaid from 19), D 66/100 DOLLARS ($60.44) a lien upon the SIXTY AN 1 through 1953 amounts to VIII That the defendants also are indebted to the City of Statesville, plaintiff -, for the 1954 taxes and interest thereon, which taxes have been levied herein, | — have not as yet been sold as required by law and thus have not vet become a nut ave aginst said property: that these taxes, however, and future taxes will lien a& Be levied and become a lien on said property in favor of hecome due, will be levied saad plaintiff. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays judement against Jim Gaither and wife, anletto Gaither their children, if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, var . ie :? any. and all other persons claiming anv interest in the lands described , an the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina: 1. For the total amount of taxes adjudged to be liens in favor cf the plaintiff, other than taxes the amount of which has not heen definitely determined, together with interest, penalties anu costs thereon} For the foreclosure of the tax sale certificate described in the Complaint and all other tax liens now duly held bv the plainti*f arcainst the defendants, and that the jiudement he declared a “first lien upon the real estate described in the certificate of sale as hereinbefore set out and as particularly described in paragraph V of the Complaint: That a Commissioner be appointed and be directed to advertise and sell the real estate described in parasraph V of this Complaint the manner bv law provided, and to applv the proceeds of sale to the payment of said judgment: For the costs of this action, and for such other and further relief as the plaintiff may be in law and equity entitled to receive. Baxter H. Finch Attornev for the Plaintiff NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Vv ae? 2. BO AE 2 2 2 A. E. GUY, after being duly sworn in the manner provided by law, depose anc . : . C4 ¢ d says: that he is the City Clerk and Treasurer-Tax Collector for the City of vatesville, North Carolina: that he has the authority to make this certiticats es | : cree ‘cation-verification: that he has read the foregoing and annexed Complaint and : knows the contents thereof: that the same is true of his own knowledge, except 167; 43 to those matters and thines therein stated vpon information and bel and 48 to those, he believes it to be true. A. §&.: Guy . Trueasurer-lax Collector City of Statesville, North Carolina 0 Worn / and Subscribed before me, thi '$ the 25 day of Aug, 1954. Clerk are Smith a : lrede}} io. ourt of NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR IREDELL GUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal corpordion, laintiff, vs Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their chiHren, if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, if any, and all other persons claiming anv interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina Defendants, ren 1 Car + wW na \# h ’ } ; Iredell County, one of the defendants named in the complaint and answering +h smn? + + £5 oO 5 ne complaint filed herein, says: VSe That Paragraph of the complaint is amittted. a ‘hat Paragraph 2 of the complaint is not denied. III m - Dine canny ; : : e : : spe ‘hat Paragraph 3 of the complaint is admitte, it beine specifically avered : : tnat the defendants claiming an interest in said land are indebted to’ the County of Irede a. £6Pr ¢ es For + . ‘ : ; ; dell for taxes for the years 1028 and 1941 through 1951 inclusive in the total amount of $41.41 as of August, 195 > . 954, aS more fully appears of records in the office of tax collector of Iredell County. IV Paragraph complaint is admitted. V Paragraph complaint is admitted. VI Paragraph complaint is admitted. VII Paragraph complaint is admitted. VIII iz ? hat Paragraph 8 of the complaint is admitted. WHEREFOR ; t B, having fully answered, the County of Iredell prays that, if tM decrees a sale Of said land that from the court the County of Iredell have and recover roce h Proceeds of said sale the amount of d for su" taxes due on said debt an other and fur ther taf relief as may be just and proper 5 i We Re Battley iy Attorney for County = vrt# CAROLINA od ter first being duly sworn, deposes and says: that grnest H. Troutman, af ; he Tax Collector for the County of Iredell and that he has read the fore-- he is tne inswer, and knows that the contents thereof are true tohis own knowledge going ’ those matters and things stated therein upon information and tdief and except UhOve i s it to be true. ag to those, he believes 1 Troutman Troutman Ernest Ernest shed heft sworn to and subscribed berore “* this 15th day of October, 195.. Nanev King Pearson Notary Public vy commission expires: September, 22, 19564 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff lin Gaither and wife, Carletto vaither,. their children, if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, f any, and all other persons c.alming any interest in the lands cescribed in the Complaint, and ‘redell County, North Carolina, Defendants ! A. BE. GUY, bete duly sworn, savs: that he is the Tax Collector and City ‘lerk and Treasurer of the plaintiff in the above-entitled action: that said ‘ction was brought by the plaintiff to foreclose on the defendants’ after ‘escribed property for delinquent taxes due the plaintiff and for an action relating to real estate within this State and for one of those actions wherein “tvice of proceas by publication under G.S. 1-98.2 might be had; that a cause ~ ction exists against the persons to be served and that they are proper parties bn wae ‘aid action and that the action is of such kind that the Court will have “‘urisd4 ‘ diction under the service of process by public ation or service of process Outside the State: And that after due diligence, personal service cannot be had within the ae names and places of residence of the defendants according to reer aa knowledge and belief are as follows: Jim Gaither is a citizen and al non, Maryland; Carletto Gaither is a citizen and resident of rt the State of Connecticut; their children, if any, addresses unknown; heir he 'r8-at-law, if any, addresses unknown: their assignees, if any, Arey eee “knowns th meat other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in ® Comp) Plaint, addresses unknown; that if such addresses are incorrect your eet See = a = Affiant does not know any other or further addresses and } all other Parties } a ; ny Ving an interest in the after-described property are unknown to your Affiant and ha ve oneen listed as al) other per sons having an a2 te in h l crib } ed n +} vile Complaint"; that the name and residences of on int": that the name nce f such person or pe ersons or pa Ties having an interest in this action other than the ones specifically named ee led as Ta +c ra "HOW 4 $ : + defendants are unknown to the plaintiff, that diligent search and inquiry } ¥ have been made to discover such name and residences and that they are and have | : : Ve Deer set forth 2 H 301) r- j ¢ ; set forth as particularly as is known to the applicant, plaintiff herein: that ~ vi) ‘ a inti ef helieves there ‘e er ) ' i are persons who are cr may be interested in the matter of the acti w 5 1 matter o she action whose names are unknown te the applicants and sai; “BTUs id persons yo sr ob + + $ p are or ma e interested as heirs, devisees, crantees assienees ? a eto ' creditors, trustees or otherwise, and the nature of such interest to the applicant The property for j pror oreclosed upon in the above-entitled action particularly described as follows: All of Lots 7.and # in Block C in the North Statesville addition to ae North Carolina, said lots being 60 by 150 ft. More fully soba h in plat on file in the office of the Register of Dees for ah ese rs ad Se ae (This property being deeded to dim fitcarch toe a age 493, Iredell County Registry). eee eine pried ios ed four lots is a protion of lots 7 and # deud dated the ere — and wife, Carbtto Gaither, to Exy Crawford by hbk AA oe cee ne Eee 1906, said deed being recorded in- County, ee ye hth ro = one office of the Rerister of Deeds for Iredell Statesville Land ¢ nz a part of No. 7 and 8 in Block C in the North wand Lompany. This lot is 30 ft. wide by 150 ft. long. WHEREFORE the nlai sy “, "ne plaintiff prays that an order be made by the Court that summe < Ky ¢ cariran < s | rvead on said defendants by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell ny aes ay . 1 County, North Carolina, as by law provided. A. E, Guy Affiant eworn to and subscribed before me this 3lst day of August, 195), T s . vane M. Worley NOtary Public My Commission Exo} AE Yi oxpires Nov, 18 1955 , Z je vont CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDBLL COUNTY city of Statesville, a municipal norporation y Plaintiff WS yim Gaither and wi fe, Carletto naither, their chidren, if any, -heir neirs-at-law and assignees, ¢ any, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands jeseribed in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendants 4 IT APPEARING to the Court from the Affidavit and verified Complaint of the plantiff in the above-entitled action that Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their children, if anv, their heirs-at-law and assignees, if anv, and all other sersons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint of the plaintiff, defendants therein, cannot after due diligence and search be found the State of North Carolina: that a cause of action exists in favor of the plaintiff against said defendants and that said defendants are proper parties to an action relatine to real property in this State: and it further appearing from said Affidavit that this action is one of those actions whepin service of process by publication under G. S. 1-98.2 might he had: It is now ordered that service of process in the above-entitled action upon Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their children, if any, their neirs-at-law and assienees, if anv, and all other persons claiming any interest ‘nthe lands described in the Complaint, defendants herein, be made by publicati ‘nthe Statesville Daily Record, newspaper published in Statesville, Iredel] county, North Carolina, cnce a week for four (4) successive weeks of the notice ‘ssued by the undersigned as provided by G.S. 1-99.2 and requiring the said tefendants to appear at the office of the undersigned Clerk of the Superior “urt of Iredell County on the 20 day of October, 1954, and answer or demurrer or othewmise plead to the Complaint. This the 31 day of August, 1954. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIO IREDELL COUNTY R COURT Citv of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff a VS Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their children, if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, if any, and all other persons claimine any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, NOTICE OF SERVICE By PROCESS BY PUBLICATION ee e ie eee Defendants | TOs. din neirs-at-law and assienes, if anv, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, defendants in the above-entitled action: ‘ake notice that a pleadine seeking relief against vou has heen filed ari commer in th ‘yperior Coan : ommenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, in the asbov- entitled action: han ; * viel aad i . . . + j ‘ne nature and purpose of said action is to enforce the tax liens against the rea] i 3 T3 ; ai estate listed in the name of Jim Gaither upon the tax books of the 0] inti¢f aa + ” ) j pilaintir® for the vear 1941 and the years 1942 through 1953 in the total su of B60 66 f 211 _ et ; and for all other and further taxes due the plaintiff at the time of the Said property in question being more particularly described as follows: : A ry . Y piste eel ge Mg ‘h Carolina, said lots being 60 by 150 ft. More “Tretdl County. North Gavol tne 1? (An, the office of the Register of Deeds fer In! Deed Book 35. Page ae (This property being deeded to Jim Gaither i I ’ fe 493, Iredell County Registry). Except : t 7 seen sig ag above-described four lets is a portion of lots 7 ee conve ed by Jin Gaither and wife. Carletto Gaither, to Exyv Crawford by 0° _ re in oe oF April, 1906, said deed bene recorded in Book 4) * tract hed ne i © of see OF the Revister of Deeds for Iredell County, 5# pres Pi r part of 2° and & in Block C in the North Statesville wenys, This lot 16.30 ft. wide be 150 ft. long. And th j © Said defendants will further take notice that they are sie il to make defense “© such pleading and appear atfhe office of the Clerk of th Superior Court of of Iredell County, North Carolina, and answer or demurrer otherwise plead + P CO the Complaint in saig action within 20 days after ie? day of September, ; or not later than October 20, 1954, and upon your failure to so do the par ‘ jl ty seekine Service azainst you, plaintiff herein, i apply to the Court f or the relief Soucht and demanded in said Complaint+ This the 31 day of August, 195k C. G. Smith Clerk of Saou NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY city of Statesville, 4 municipal corporation. Plaintiff WS tim Gaither and wife, Carletto gaither, their children, if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, :¢ any, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendants { I C lu SM eH Clerk of the Superior Court, do hereby aegouiry nds ‘ 2 ° . pid a . copy of the Summons, Complaint, Affidavit, Order of Publication, and Notice of service of Process was directly mailed to each party whose name and residence appears in the Affidavit, to-wit: Jim Gaither, Baltimore, Maryland: Carletto saither, Hartford State of Connecticut, on this the 31 day of August, 195k. This the 31 dav of August, 195k. CoG Smien * Clerk of the Superior Court. (SEE JUDGMENT IN BOOK 32,PAGE 2) NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff - vS « ‘in Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, COMMISSIONER'S REPORT a children, if any, their heirs-at-law pe assignees, if anv, and all other persons --aiming any interest in the lands described in the -omplaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, | Defendants i 'O THE HONORABLE C. G. SMITH, Clerk of the Superior Court: The undersigned, R. A. Hedrick, heretofore appointed by this Court (* : vomm 4 Ssioner for the sale of the land described in the Petition, reports to the f\ “ourt the following: I That acting under said order and after due advertisement as required by law ; ee nd the terms of said order, he offered the land described in the Petition for ga} ® at public auction for cash at the door of the Courthouse, in Statesville, North “arolina, at noon on the 26th day of November, 1954, when and were Frank Deaton became the last and highest bidder in the sum of $175.00. II T ; and mt your Commissioner verily believes that said price is fair and adequate nd ig “S much as he could reasonably expect to receive from the sale of said land. WH ; EREFORE, your Commissioner respectfully recommends to the Court that if no a va Ate bid be made within ten days as by law allowed said sale be approved and “onfirmed, the @6th day of November, 1954. ‘ ; aed ‘3 a ae 5758 NORTH CAROLINA THE SUPERIOR couRr IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal Corporation, Plaintiff VS SUMMONS FOR William Butler and spouse, Mrs. I. B. Jones RELIEF and spouse, JohnH. Butler and spouse, and James A,Butler/and spouse, being the children of the late James A. Butler, and all other persons claiming anv interest in the lands described in the complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendants MAD T KT SARC LI i\ As — iia ie ade of Iredell Countv--GREETING: ssued in a tax foreclosure proceeding SD TO SUMMON William Butler and spouse, Mrs. I. B, Jones Butler and spouse, and James A Butler. Jr nd spouse, the late James A. Butler, and all other persons Claiming any inter lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North varolina, the defendants above named, if to be found within your county, to appear hefore the Clerk e of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, at the Courthouse in n Statesville, N. C., within 30 (thirtv)davs after date of service of siymmons and 0 . , Gia a : *ce of Summons and Complaint herein, and answer said Complaint or ott 2rwise r > we $ + £ erwise plead within the time required by law. A copy of the Complaint is heret att sA T + ¢ i] reto attached. Let the defendants take notice that if they fail to file vritten answer to the Said Complaint or otherwise plead within the time aw, the plaintiff wil apply to the Cont for the relief demanded the Complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due return. viven under my hand and seal of said Court, this 2h day of April, 195k. Attorney for plaintiff: Name Baxter H. F4 inch C, G. Smith —— 2054 S Clerk Superbr Court rv + . e Venter St s Statesville, N. C. pe am CERTIFICATE. OF RECEIPT OF SUMMONS BY SHERIFF ‘ c 4 / * s A s te ol ved n ¢ 4 LCE OT o 1 0 N. Carolina, this the auth 43° J. C. Rumple Sheriff OFFICERS RETURN OF SUMMONS : hth. 1954. Served by delivering a copy of the within summons, geceived April 2htn, OS ith a cOPY of Complaint to the following named defendants on the i wW rogether dates shown opposite their names? due and diligent search William Butler & spouse, Mre,.1..5, Jones & After au oe John H. Butler & spouse, James A. Butler & spouse, children of the spouse, am James A Butler, & all other persons claiming anv interest in lands on late vam for the 27th day of April, 1954. n 1 5 ds Wwe mumpie Sheriff Iredell Sue McLean Deputy Ichn Alexander, as Chm. County Commissioners, Iredell County, 27th dav of April, 1951 e Tee $ 2.50 Due NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal Corporation, Plaintiff lilliam Butler & spouse, Mrs. I. B. Jones & spouse John H. Butler & spouse, and James A. Butler, Jr. « Spouse, being the children of the late James A. Sutler, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell vountv, North Carol ina, Defendants The plaintiff, complaining of the defendants, allezes: I That the plaintiff, City of Statesville, is a municipal corporation or i ° ‘ Q i‘ J ganized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of North Caro) 4 : ‘ rolina and its charter, and as such is authorized and empowered to levy taxes an ai Sard d street assessments against real property located within its boundaries and City Lins ; i J Limits, and the amount of taxes levied is a prior lien against such pro ; Perty in favor of said plaintiff: aa That the defendant William Butler & spouse are citizens and residents of Freem Mie Mew Hampshire; that the defendant Mrs. I. B. Jones & spouse are Citige "8 and residents of Pineland, Florida: that the defendant John H, Butler Spouse : . are citizens and residents of Winchester, Kentucky? and that the defor ‘ “ant James A. Butler, Jr, & spouse are citizens and residents of Wittier, California, said defendants being the sole children and heirs--at~law of + Y the late James A. Butler of Iredell County, North Carolina, in whose name the after-descrihbed propertv is listed of record: Bei That the defendant, Iredell County, is a body politic and corporate, of ’ 1 the Sate of North Carolina, and as such is authaized and empowered to levy tay Y baxes against real or personal property located within its boundaries: that the imvizt? 12 14 piain informed and so believes that the defendants at the time of the Filing of this Complaint also are indebted to the said Iredell County for taxes levied by said defendant commencing the year 1941 and continuing up to the time of the filing of this instrument; IV o That if there are any other persons, firms, or corporations that have any interest in the after-described property such persons, firms, or corporations are unknown to this plaintiffs; V James A. Butler was deeded three lots or parcels of land vy, 1907, by deed of J. S. Kerr which deed is recorded in 520 . said property is situated in Statesville Township, Carolina, and was discovered by vhis plaintiff and listed ry, £ : 1 } T plaj nm its books for taxes as of the lst day of January, 1941, j h or Vv ) + 4 > : Lcn propety particularly described as follows: REINA ny ' ille ; vaiNG all of lots Nos. 18, 19, and 20 in Block D of the North Statesvil' cn, Company as shown on map or file in the Rezister of Deeds office of Irede! bo errr ae Said map being recorded in Deed Book 15 a* ee Th. oe Ss ! e€ complete descripti , ca th f eat e f Mrs. \lice Daywauld to J ption see the map aforesaid and the deed of ™ Oy aie Kerr dated +ha cs a+ t A 007 nd recorded in Deed Book 35 at pae S19 'TesAal) Mace 15th day eta +." pae » +redell County Registry. oe eee has hean platted and mapped hoth bv the plaintiff and tne defe dant iredel1 County and is that same property known and referred to on Sé n yo in tne j 7% i i : i Te Treasurer on at 3 he plaintiff's City Tax Collector, Clerk and the defendant Iredeit aiock @, lots Nos. 9, 10, and 11, and also mapped " Shee Sh Beane ounty and recorded in its County Manager's office 8 g » Dlock 8, lots Nos, 9, 10, and ii | That the vi Tax Collector of the herein, j } » in consequence of the nonpayment of certain City of Statesville taxes for the vear 1941 ILL, mh 4 n which had been lawfully levied, and which were a Lien UP the real estate vie’ »Sstate hereinhefore fully descrihed in paragraph V above, did, on Sept, 1912 offer for sale at the lk4th dav of sth 7 s 7 aw, » after advertisement in the manner providec by? Public auction at : : the Courthouse door of Iredell Count real estate described in paragraph V of this Complaint, when and where but Plaintiff became the last and h a, ichest bidder, and the purchaser of said estate for the Sum of THR tat 4 DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS ($3.50), said sum uding the ab o p 1 sila sth above mentioned taxes, interest, and penalities including sBvet Ni 70¢ T C E 8X Collectorts Cost: that the Plaintiff is entitled to recover f e of 6% rom the dat! or < tifs he certificate hereinafter Set for in 4 rw hy on j r $4 id 8u ! at % ~ at p a num erest oO r he r e n oO! one J ‘ th, and at the rate of 6% per anm Ae : ginti® City of Statesville, North Carolina, pl poe until paid; that thereupon a certificate of sale for said property therea jelivered to the plaintiff, which tax sale certificate is now in the was deti a ton of and owned by the City of Statesville, plaintiff herein, said sales ssi posse ‘ 1d in the sales certificate book in the office of the certificate being recorded u Tax Yollector, reference to which is hereby made city Clerk and Treasurer and Ta P git is adked that same be taken as a part of this paragraph as if fully and 1t 1s Pe iV at oueaeneatt that the same is still outstanding and unredeemed, and the oeu " -debtedness evidenced by same has not been paid: that the said certificate is indebte opitee Sema ‘words and figures as set out in the aforesaid sales certificate, and more particularly as follows: CERTIFICATE OF SALE OF REAL ESTATE FOR NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNT I, A. EB GUY, Clerk and Treasurer of the City of Statesville, do hereby certify that the tax lien on the following described real property in said taxing unit to-wit: James A, Butler TNare of taxpaver in which property was listed) 3 Lots in Statesville, (Inside) Township was, on the lith dav of September, 1942, duly sold by me in the manner provided by law, for the delinquent taxes for the vear 1941 amountine to Two and 64 --100 dollars (3 2.44) penalty and cost. to be added as provided by law when an where Citv of Statesville purchased said lien on said Tame of Purchaser) real property at the price of Three and 50-100 dollars ($3.50) said amount being the highest and hest bid for And I further certify that unless payment of said lien is made within the time and the manner provided bv law, sai¢ purchaser whose name is herein given, his heirs or assigns, shall have the right to foreclose said real property by any proceeding allowed by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand, this 14 day of Sept., 1942. AND TREASURER VII That the plaintiff during the year 1950 paved and hardsurfaced a street “vining alongside and adjacent to the property aforesaid, namely Bingham Str ° ss ° } ] wreet, Improving the value of the property aforesaid and under and pursuant to th he t , : : & if : ; “rms of the charter of the City of Statesville and the General Statutes of the h ® State of North Carolina appertaining to streets assessments Dy munie4 aso : ‘ “tpalities and partcularly this plaintiff, the defendants said property was 2 “ssessed for special benefits accruing to them and the property hereinabove desep; : : *ribed and were assessed with said street assessments in the principal sum of TWO HUNDRED eer t 0 HUNDRED SEVENTY FOUR AND 50/100 DOLLARS ($274.50) which assessmen\ appe : ri ~— record in the office of the City Clerk and Treasurer and Tax Collector for the cs e a 3 5 i ‘ _ = Gity of Statesville, North Carolina, in the City Hall in Statesville, ‘Orth ¢ P : . “ de . “rolina, in the street assessment book or record in said office; that the ‘nteregs ‘nd penalities on said assessment to date total FIFTY-THREE AND 53/100 DOLLARS (4 NUNDRED TWENTY-EIGHT AND 03/100 DOLLARS ($328.03), said street assessment 93.53), making a orand total for street assessment in the sum of now Const ituting a lien against said property. Vit coat CAROLINA That subsequent to the tax lien hereinabove Specifically set Out for +, ‘eEDELL COUNTY Vie em or 20 A 1941 taxes, interest and penalty, advertising and costs, as = I 0 aforesaid, the fter heing duly sworn in the manner provided by lar, deposes } ; j F T C I 4 > defendarts are indebted to the plaintiff for subsequent taxes levied by the : A, B GUY, a . 6 i C ‘ - Paw % TUS dee . ; ‘: he is the City Clerk and Treasurer-Tax Collector for the City plaintiff amainst the defendants’ property and said taxes have become also | and says: ‘That ne 4 MT ‘Carolina: that he has the authority to make this same property in favor of the plaintiff f - a ille, North*Carolina: same property in favor o ne plaintiff or the years 191.2 B of Statesvi ; : rification: that. he has read the foresoing and annexed sive, the principal taxes alone with interest and penalities wortification-verificat advertisi ; f: that the same is true of his own nm nm y yr —_— ; x the contents thereo ° sil . sing, and costs total THIRTY-NINES DOLLARS ($39.00)* that the total tare = Complaint and knows now adue +hoa plaintiff to those matters and things therein stated upon informati which have been lawfully levied and which constitute a S inowledge, except aS LO LAYeL lien nnen the real i | + th e he he] eves ¢ p | 2 4 L¢ } rouch 52 . m heli = and Ss ( os ; , € f state a oresa d ror l t 3 ‘ am¢ I S 0 FOR Y. and ” 1é 9 4a A . Ae Ge y AND 50 L100 D¢ LLAR 5 ( 3! 2.50) ; that the total amount, due the plaintiff by Treasurer-Tax Collectc r Citv of Statesville, North Carolin: Street assessment aforesaid total THREE : JUV defendants Wey reason of tha AND 03/100 DOLLARS (8328.03), mddne a erand total due to hk nthe hefore mre MIDDO a o~ onnen sila e sworn tC and subscr ¢ a net or il * defendants of THREES HUNDRED SEVENTY AND 53/100 DOLLARS . this the 2h day of April, 195L. IX C. Gs Smith clerk of the Superior Court of © are indehte C4 P. Seat nae nti? f Iredell County. also a indebted to the City of Statesville, plainti‘ ae the defendants in, for the 1953 taxes and interest thereon, totaling $3.21, which taxes ; . B NORTH CAROLINA been levied but have not as vet been sold as required hy law and thus have “ie not vet h ecome a ] j 0 TT ‘ ‘ IREDELL COUNTY afainst said property: that these taxes, however, and ae t B citv of Statesville, a municipal corporation will he levied and become a lien on said property of Statesville, am nicipa FE ° Plaintiff ‘udement arainst William Butler and ‘lliam Butler spouse, Mrs. I B. Jones etek eee » John H. Butler and spouse, and James |. nl spot eee. Put kee and spouse, AFFIDAVIT and James A, Butler, Jr. and spouse, being children of the late James A. Butler, all other persons claiming anv interest a s 0 Iredell County, North Carolina, Carolina: Rut ar } D i : Butler, Jr.. and Spouse being the children of the late James A. Butler, and’ the Other persons Claimi and 4 ne anv interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell] County, North in ] Fo +he f° oo eee sores amount of taxes adjudged to be liens in favor + Une plaintiff + ‘ ; pa : 8 + : . T ,ollector, of the plaintstr, joes han canbe -hs-aent of which ha “&. GUY, being duly sworn, says: that he is the Tax C rete ciee initely determined, together with interest, | ae 7 tape at oy epereine lerk and Treasurer of the plaintiff in the above-entitled actions that vai W 9 For the foreclosre Cf the t the complaint and all ot ax sale certificate described in plaintiff azainst the qd _s Fear ‘tion was brousht by the plaintiff to foreclose on the defendants’ aft her tax liens now duly held by the desers wat ater pl aaneae gainst efendants, and that the judgment be {Scribe Property for delinquent taxes and street, assessments due t ple certificate ote ten upon the real estate described in the ly and f F ny Br described 3 Sale as hereinbefore set, out and as particulars! “’ Tor an action relating to real estate within this State and for on ? “4D paragraph V of the Complaint: | ff That ac and sel] oe taint in the manner pro OF sde to the Pavment of sa For the cost relief as th receive, Ommissioner be appo acti ‘ Q ‘is ight be had; nS wherein service of ess by publication under G.S. 1-98.2 m : tise process by p th inted and be directed to adverti LNne real estate de scribed i chis that a ¢ . Scribed in paragraph V of th oceeds ause o + thev are ; action exists against the persons to be served and that vided by law, and to apply the 7 prope ; t the Court Said judement: vePer parties to said action and that the action is of such kind that > and for such other and further "11 hay jur r rvice ® jurisdiction y ; b ublication or se in ] d to : ’ nder the service of process by Pp 4 aw and equity entitle Tor t this action, ® plaj nti c. may he of Of pp Process Cutside the State: Baxter H. Finch Attorney for the Plaintit! the : And that after due diligence, personal service cannot be had within States our * and the names and places of residence of the defendants according to y Af} ant ’ se S best knowledge and belief are as follows: William Butler and spou Te citd d 2 . . Jones an ns and residents of Freemont, New Hampshire? Mrs. I. B SPouge are sy and Citizens and residents of Pineland, Florida: John H. Butle nd residents of Winchester, Kentucky: a" " 4 > and James AB o utler ’ Jr., and spouse are citizens and residents of Wittier, California: that 4 such addresses are incorrect your Affiant does not know any other or forth ae rther addresses and all other parties having an interest in the after-described sroperty are unknown to your Affiant and have been listed as "ql Other persons havine an interest in the lands described in the Complaint": that the name and residences of such person or persons or parties having an : 1 +n + his action other than the ones specifically named as defendants unknown to the plaintiff, that diligent search and inauirv have been cA 4 A A iscover such name and residences and that they are and have heen set q Y Yr ; aa ~ 1 xy © to ~ + + 2 : -n 1 - as particularly as is known to the applicant, plaintiff herein: that the ayes there are persons who are or may he interested in the + action whose names are unknown to the applicant: and said or may be interested as heirs, devisees, crantees, itors, trustees or otherwise, and the nature of such 1 the applicant. he foreclosed upon in the above-entitled action described as follows: DESCRIPTION RRTN?T 2.7 . : ve : : er oo cls = ine os and 20 in Block D of the North Statesville . s snown on map or file in the Register of Deeds office aes as ae North Carolina, said map being recorded in Deed aforesaid i eee ae 7 so complete description see the map a0 @66 ata; ta Alice Daywauld to J. S. Kerr dated the ma DE ay oO [ ay, eothe histone » and recorded in Deed Book 35 at page 512, Iredell swe syto iL Ve £ T ) , OT lrede] This pronnarteew: This propert has been platted and mapped hoth by the plaintiff and the to an anche vVOountv and is that same property known and 1 Clert ont te in the office of the plaintiff's City Tax Collector, Cler} ! Lreasure > ! and also mapped cee eo 38, Block g , lots Nos. 9, 10, and ll, County Managert y the defendant Iredell County and recorded in its it Me Y S of Ice at pare 38, Block Rg, lots Nos. Qo, 1G; and the WHEREFORE. + inti 4, the plaintir¢ prays that an order be made by the Court that Summons be served on Sai atd defendants hy publication in some newspaper published in Irede ee e d a vLOoUnN Vs North Caplina, as by law provided. City of Statesville a, By A. E, Guy, City Clerk & ore Affiant “worn to and Subscribed before me + \ his Ath dav of Mav, 105), Jane M, w me Orley Notary Public — My commission expires: NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘ TY REDELL COUN city of Sratesyilie, a municpal corporation, Plaintiff vS lliam Butler and spouse, rs IB. Jones and spouse, John H, Butler and spouse, and James A. Butler, dre and spouse, being the children of the late dames A. Butler, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands sescribed in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendants IT APPEARING to the Court from the Affidavit and verified Complaint of the plaintiff in the above-entitled action that vVilliam Butler and spouse, irs, I. B. Jones and spouse, John H. Butler and spouse, and James A. 3utler, Jr, and spouse, being the children of the late James A. Butler, and all other persons claimine any interestin the lands described in the Complaint of the plaintiff, defendants therein, cannot after due diligence and search be fou in the State of North Carolina: that a cause of action exists in favor of the plaintiff against said defendants and that said defendants are proper parties to an action relating to real property in this State: and it her appearing from said Affidavit that this action is one of those actions wherein service of process by publication under G. S. 1-98.2 might he had: It is now ordered that service of process in the above-entitled action upon William Butler and spouse, Mrs. I B Jones and spouse, John H. Butler and pouse, and James A, Rutler, Jr. and spouse, being «he children of the late James A, Butler, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands ‘escribed in the Complaint, defendants herein, be made by publication in the Statesville Daily Record, newspaper published in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, once a week for four (4).suecessive weeks of the notice ‘ssued by the undersigned as provided by G. S. 1--99.2 and requiring the said defe nd : ; io ‘ants to appear at the office of the undersigned Clerk of the superior Court u of Iredel] County, on the 22nd day of June, 1954, and answer or demurrer or 9 : therwise Plead to the Complaint. This the Lth day of May, 195k. C._G. Smith Clerk of superior Court ray coal ‘i ee 4 Ce | North Carolina Iredell County Citv of Statesville CERTIFICATE OF CLERK ay , + Clerk O the Superior Court do hereby certify that a copy Affidavit, Order of Publication and Notice of sos. ion was duly mailed to each party whose name and residence William Butler, Freemont, New Hampshire: Florida: John H. Butler, Winchester, Kentucky: and on this the 5th dav of May, 195), G. Smith Superior Court THE SUPERIOR COURT unicipal corporation . NOTICE OF SBRVICE BY Mrs. hv B. Jones utler and spouse, and and spouse, heing the >S A. Butler, and anv interest inthe somplaint, and Iredell] PROCSSS_BY PUBLICATION { Defendants | utler and spouse, Mrs. I. B and James A, Ri itler, Jr., and spouse, being the children of the 42 Ae Butler, and all other © Complaint, defendants in the above-entitled action: Take notice that 7 , , d 7 hat a pleading seeking relief azvainst you has been filed an commensed in the S$nr : Ail f oO 9eY) yy ff 1+ ~ - i . t or vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, in the have 4 adove--entitled action: The nature he ure a urpose : : inst nd purpose of Said action is to enforce the tax liens again the real estate listed in the name of James A. Butler, deceased, upon che % ho 3 bocks of the Plaintiff ¢ dY em vo e : . t 1 or the year 1941 and th years 1912 throug a vOtal sum of $42 50 m e g ; rt ene EOP. Bt reat assessments and lien against said } oor in the sum of $328.0 maki 9 $ for a : ©O3, making 2 "rand total of $370.53 an 11 CRE - further faxes qd ue the plaintir said Praintiff at the time of the filing of this actdoms Said propert+ in ca ; ) ] questio vind n being more Particularly described as follows: B. Jones and spouse, John H. Butler : gcrived persons claiming any interest in the lands des¢ DESCRIPTION: SING all of lots Nos. 18, 19, and 20 in Block D of the North Statesville BEING a anv as shown on map or file in the Register of Deeds office of Land Pr Geenty North Carolina, said map being recorded in Deed Book 15 irae 72h, For a more complete description see the map aforesaid and at pee of Mrs. Alice Daywauld to J S Kerr dated the 15th day of May, ae recorded in Deed Book 35 at page 512, Iredell County Registry. yVig This property has been platted and mapped both td the plaintiff and the defendant Iredell County and is that Same plore: vy known and referred to on said maps in the office of the plaintif Ss City Tax Collector, Clerk ond Treasurer on page 38, Block 8, lots Nos. 9, 10, and ll, and also mapped by the defendant Iredell County and recorded in its County Manager's office at page 38, Block 8, lots Nos. 9, 10, and ll. And the said defendants will further take notice that they are required -o make defense to such pleading and appear at the office of the Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and demurrer or otherwise plead to the Complaint in said action within 20 days after the 2nd jay of June, 1954, or not later than June 22, 1954, and upon your failure to so do the party seeking service against you, plaintiff herein, will apply tc the Court for the relief sought and demanded in said Complaint. This the 4 dav of May, 1954. ‘ 7 oan 5 + Cc. Ge Emit Superior Court NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY vity of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Pp in+it Pigingirt. vs “iliam Butler and spouse, Mrs. 1. B. Jones and Spouse, John H. utler and spouse, James A. Butler ". and spouse, beine the children of the last James A, Butler, and all ry Persons claiming any interest ae lands described in the Complaint, nd Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendants, The , T is ° . . he County of Iredell, answerine the Complaint filed herein That P : aragraph 1 of the Complaint is admitted. II Th at Paraeraph 2 of the Complaint is presumed to be true. III " “hat Paragraph 3 of the Complaint is admitted, it being specifically d that the defendants are indebted to the County of Iredell for taxes “Or the years 4941-1953 s is hereto inclusive, an itemized statement of said taxe d asked to be taken as a part of this Answer as if fully set forth "erein, IV That P aragraph bh of said Complaint is admitted. That Paragraph 5 t 16th 2C V said Complaint is admitted, VI Paragraph ¢ Complaint is presumed to he VII ry Paragraph Complaint is presumed to he VIII Complaint is presymed to he ‘ IX Complaint is presumed to he true, answered the County of Iredell prays that if the f said land that the Sounty of Iredell have and recover Sale, the sum of $54.41 with interest from date of purchase price and for such other and further i. Battley County of Iredell Attorney #2 rst being duly sworn, dep and says: that County of Iredell and that he has read the at the contents thereof are true to his own ters and things statd therein pon information and Urey H. Troutman H, Troutman and su day of June * NI 5 j ar Cw Ki Dp Set INS FeAarson mr | nith \T t Notary Public a veion expires: September 22 yoRTH CARCLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY city of Statesville, a municipal -ion ‘ corporators Plaintiff VS Wiliam Butler and spouse, Mrs. |, B. Jones and spouse, John H. autler and spouse, and James A. AV heinzg Qutler, ym and spouse, be the children of the late dames 4, Butler, and all other persons slaiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint » and Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendants THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable G, omith, Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, 1 this the 23rd dav of June, 195L. At said hearing it appeared to the Cort that: I A dulv verified Complaint was filed by the plaintiff in the . the Clerk of the Superior Court cf Iredell County, on the 2kth day of April 195k. issned by the Clerk of the Superior Summons as to all the defendants was of Iredell County on the 24th dav of April, IIl s+h mm That the defendant County has been personally served w Iredell summons in the manner and within the time required by law 7 e’th day of April, 1°5h* that the defendants William “TS. 1. B. Jones and spouse, John H. Butler and spouse, Yr rs and spouse, heine all of the children of the late James A. Butler, 7S i. ‘\* Persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complain deen Served hy hy hlication in the manner and within the time required IV T : : ' * the time prescribed by law during which the defendants might appear and pread to the either plaintiff's Complaint has expired, and the defendants and Fr all of them, except Iredell County, have not appeared or pleaded in any manner to the hich Plaintiff's Complaint, and the time prescribed by law during w any ea . . s mi Person having an interest in the subject matter of this action that might appear and set up his, her, or their clain has expired, and no such person has 3 Ppeared or got one of Up or defended any such claim, except Iredell vounty, th A defendants herein, V That the defendant Iredell County filed its answer t © the Plaintirer, complaint admitting all the allewations set out in the plaintires S Complain: in its said answer a claim for taxes due to Irede}} Co ee UNnty arid setting 1 — hy the defendans except Iredell County avrainst the property deserihed 4eserit n the Cx my la $ nt in the tot 4] sin of 51; -s 7 DOLLARS said Answer ha vine been filed CU On his action was not commenced prior to six months after the lith day of Septem . 19h2. "he Court at said hearing upon the verified Complain filed by the plaintiff and the verified Answer filed by the defendant, Iredel} County, he foll nv facts. (a) | Ay sal rertifiegte for iSL) Cite of Statesville taxes listed are of James A. itler avainst real estate hereinafter fully degerihed, to the plaintiff on the 14th dav of September, 1942. by the tar ollecte t th , " statesville after said tax collector had advertised aid real estate and had seld said real estate for said taxes at the time and anner provided hy law, plaintiff being the highest bidder for said tate & ile, said taxes were duly and regularly assessed and 10) laintiff is the holder of said tax sale certificate and there is and n the sum of $3.50, with penalty on said sum at the rate can igs per annum fror and after the 11 th dav of September, 10.2 until paid. (c) at’ the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff for subsenuen: es levied bv the plaintiff a tainst the defendants’ property and said » incl 7 interest and penalties, advertising and costs plus the 1941 aX¢ otal $45.71. (d) That the defendants and each of them are indebted to Iredell Gout’ or taxes from 1941 through 1953 in the sum of 3keh1 DOLLARS which taxes were duly and reemlarly assessed and levied against the property hereinafter described, (e) That during the vear 1950 the plaintiff paved and harsurfaced § street running alone ed Side and adjacent to the property hereinafter describ value of poe ; pon plaintiff has duly and properly assessed and levied uP? ruing to ther putes 0 belonging t¢ the e ; ne de endants, namely RBineham Street, improving the the propety and the the said p 0 + ‘ JT 6 ee property of the defendants for the special benefits ace pursuant to the teres ae % © verms of the said City's charter and the General 9%@ the otate of N , ‘ North Carolina appertaining to street assessments by muniel +h mo 4 Nat said ‘On 03 auc Street assessments are now due the plaint iff in the sum Of 3328 including ven rhe | ding penalties, Interest, and costs, making a grant total due Plaintiff b set vy the defendants, except Iredell County, of $373. 7he palitie | voW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed: he plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, except Iredell (1) That t $45.71 for taxes, including ; +aracte nawne ak a ? county, the sum of interests, penalties, and Q through 1° inclusive: that tha’ Aafendarec sosts, for the vears 1941 th rh 53 inel v and that the defendants s1]iam Butler and sponse, Mrs. I. B. Jgnes and smse, John H. %utler and Wilda r enouse, and James A. Butler, Jr., and spouse, heing the children of the DPVUUOS 9 Butler, and all other pesons claiming anv interest in the land l late James A. described in the Complaint, except Iredell County, pay the costs incl penalt fee eoate and fees eonstit + ttyed by the Court: that all said surs, a first lien upon certain real estate descrihed as follows: DESCRIPTION BEING all of lets Nos. 18, 19, and 20 in Block D of the North Statesvi Land Company as shown on map or file in the Register of Deeds office ¢ v4 Iredell County, North Carclina, said map heinge recorded in Deed 300! at paze 754. For a more..complete descrip a the deed of Mrs, Alice Davwanld to J. S. Kerr dated the 15th dav of Mar uding a reasonable fee for plaintiff's attornev, the same to he hereafter tion see the map aforesaid and 1907, and recorded in Deed Book 35 at pare 512, Iredell County Keristry. This property has heen plated and mapped both by the plaintiff and th defendant Lrede]] County and is that same pre pert vy known and re Farpred on Said maps in the office of the plaintiff's City Tax Collector, Cler and Treasurer on pare 38, Block 8, lots Nos. 9, 10, and 11, and als« mapped by the defendant Iredell County and recerded in its County Mana office at pare 38, Block B, los Nos. 9, 10, ard 11. . (2) That, the defendant Iredell County have and recover o the de fan 1a ‘illiam Butler and spouse, Mrs. I. B. Jones and spouse, John H. Butler and spouse, and James A. Butler, Jr., and spouse, heine the children of the late J 8 Ry, - : <i cy , . ames A. Butler, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands leserth 4 on la iia hp 5c, ia ia , és scribed in the Vomplaint, the full sum of 54.41 DOLLARS for taxes, includ interests : penal tiac S, and costs, for the years 1941 throvgh 1953 inclusive: and that : f . hat the said defendants pav the costs of this action, as aforesaid, includ Fan " ’ ding a fee of $3.00 for the attorney for the defendant Iredell County; th nat a Sai S1m $ : “4 ll said Sums, interests, penalties, costs, and fees constitute a first lien ' ‘. upon the real estate described above. (3) That the plaintiff have and recover of and from the defendants, +) ‘ ‘lliam But ‘ : E ‘ler and spouse, Mrs. I, B. Jones and spouse, JohnH. Butler and pouse : ; » and James A. Butler, Jt ~<', and spouse, } Tames R ; a, utler, and all other persons claiming anv interest in the lands An ‘’8Crihad ‘ . ‘ ed i in the Complaint » except Iredell County, the sum of $328.03 for Star ¢ t¢ 1 eorta nte no i being the children of the late ee ’ as Sessmentes and improvements? that the defendants, except Iredell vounty, eh al] 2 Pay the cost of this action as aforesaid, including a reasonable fee for Plaintyres ' 8 attorney the same to be hereafter fixed by the Court: that all Sai@q Sums » Péenalt ies ; hereinabove described costs, and fees constitute a first lien upon the property men aerinien matraieatle re hnitrntreieeiescinntteoenn tb Meese erened Peete — eee oe atresia ; , : (i). tha his Judement he declared a first lien upon the real eState Nereinahnve Aaoernriha c sKiAYr +4 5 I } : [ nereinabove described, and superior to any title, interest, NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPER] Claim, op lien that any of the Defendants have, have had or may have in or to said ‘agDELL COUNTY p Operty ; ; ; is ; unicipal xcept T redell County as aforesaid. ‘ity of Statesville, am n p j Hedrick he 2 4 sohy Dot j « Ae Hedriel and he is hereby appointed a Commissioner Plaintiff | of this Court to forthwith sell the above-described r estat ve-Gescribed real estate, and the on ! Said R. A. Hedrick, as Commissioner is rehyv dire . : f \ ae mmissioner is hereby directed to sell said peal ‘liam Butler and spouse, Mrs. ! WL LLLGR Seer : ‘ pn. Jones and spouse, John He COMMISSIONER sS REI ORT idder, after antler and spouse, and James A. butler Jr. and spouse, being se door of the children of the late James ' _ Butler, and all other persons lished in the slaiming anv interest in the lands ate at public auction for cash to the last and hicthest notice of said sale shall have heen published at the Courthoy a iredell County for a period of 30 davs and shall have been pi ; Complaint. and Gtatcavii ls Reaned wid Sune | described in the Complaint, vit Ord and Landmark once a week for four consecyt 1ve weeks, and Iredell County, North Carolina, 2 anDINK, and fram tha ” + - + a ( and fro ne last and highest bidder at such Sale a cash Defendants ! pi r moun Of 4 of thetotal bid. and after the confirmation of ; TO THE HONORAPLE C. G. SMITH, CLERK OF THE SUPERI( a\ iis Al 1 y Ourt, the said R. A. Hedrick, Commésioner, shall upon | Theundersigned, R. A. Hedrick, heretofore appointed bv this Court Payment of tne purchase price, execute a deed conveying to the purchaser the S Commissioner for the sale of the land described in the Petition, reports tx« al estat hereinahov deseri ed, in fee Simple, and the said R, 4A, Hedrick, s 6the Court the followings? vommissioner, shall applv the preceeds of said sale as follows: : I ( A a ch 7 P43 Wot Na ty + ’ . : j i 8) shal] pa he costs of this action, including a reasonable That acting under said order and after due advertisement as required hy Ze ¢ t aint CHL o aT. T Y st + \ } Qf ” } ’ g 4 ; ] ; i} j j ! attorn C » hereafter fixed by the Court, and includine law and the terms of saidorder, he offered the land descrihed in the Petition for 1 . fry +} } r r a A noants aT 7 Y ‘wr + + Va . . : : e o 2 : nr + ; + ew oO mes attorney in the sum of $3.00, and inclding commission: sale at public auction for cash at the door of the Courthouse in Statesvill: Ra: kA mM, ar } \ f costs of advertising and selling the aforesaid property. ‘orth Carolina, at noon on the 30th day of July, 1954, when and where H. 8. a \ sneé next r : . sp vs . $1] Lew . 2 : ot , AD NOTT : / 41) ] x pay h amounts due the plaintiff, City of Statesvi. eT Lewis hecame the last and hichest hidder in the sum of hd - D¢ LLANOe and the Aefonde + Ud 1eT¢ ar Y joa] )] YoOuntey + ee : T , way , + YOounty, the amounts awarded in this Judgment by wa} I] Of taxe penalties s ‘ ee ests therefor pro rata; then shall he next pa) "hat vour Commissioner verily believes that said price is fair and he judement for sneciat . . 2 , sp al nerit assessments awarded to the plaintiff, togetne “wequate and is as much as he could reasonably expect to receive from the sal \ tb nt erests and costs: f S: then shall he pay pro rata taxes, penalties, said land, teracte | I Sts, and costs of aan a . es x : i WHER ER ny . ° . 1 + axing units which were parties to said action but WMEREFORE, your Commissioner respectfully recommends to the Court that which filed nc } q 1O0 anSwe rs to th g to) no * at ‘ : 5s ann re action: then shall he pay pro rata any specié advance bid he made within ten days as by law allowed said sale be approved ann ani ho 2 & ene :s assessmen+ S o a pues i A 2 any n . © axing units which failed to file an answer to this confirmed. action together with int PR Aterests and costs on sai sge ts: d any balance ‘his the Oth dav of Ju 195), Said assessments: an 0 y¥, i954. then remaining sh ing shal] _ accord “ ‘ ‘ i 36 Court t \ | ic’ accordance with the directions d¢ this Cou R. A. Hedricx and particular] , Commissioner AVUICULE Ly ton thea is ,omn 1ssi0on ne per Son or persons entitled to receive said balance, Or any part there i je nereof, which Shall he : . : } t e paid into the Clerk of the Superior Cour C Iredel] County. (ce) The Commi Commissioner ehe? A " er Shall make a fy11 report to the Court within thre davs follow; . ? LU G U ; Owing Said Sale od ~» > Tivi +} (d) “Ag the full Particulars thereof, C The Commiss; sioner s : * Shall give a full and final report to the Court very ds, wi in es e f a s ter de ++ th V ay a liv ry oO] che dee , Me U ‘ : , - of Same, rec ipt ) th pu ch S$ e ¢ tle ure ase pani ed h avo 4 Vv receipts evid rj ‘ ee chien Price, and the dishursement of the proe encin: -ing all such disbursements. m This the 2h day of June 195) ‘ C. G. Smith Clerk of the gh tort tnt IREDELL COUNTY TIP anpe: D IN THE SUPERIOR COURT City of Statesville, a municipal Plaintiff h aid ;T liam Rntlar anA enanes My 7 R lliar ler and spouse, Mrs. I. B. Jones, and spouse, John H. Butler and spouse, and ; a : : 8 COMMISSIONER'S propos JameS Ae utier, vr. and spouse, bveings the oft Advan ant LAweA Ai ie Sake eee oe . i ‘COG OD] hildren of the late James A. tler, and al id other persons claimine any interest in the ' r laacprrit } . +) y nlad o J 4 Si n e Complaint, and Iredell ZOUY Pi lort h yar ] na, Defendants nders Tne Gs . Re Hedrick : heret ofore appoint ed eo this Court Mmissiener ‘or one sale of the land described in the Petition reports to - . , 7 4 U0 2 he Ac YAmmiaeatanoan aratrtnFt ¥ ” , as C SSioner, heretofore reported to the Court the sale of “Ee ¥yY Geese 1 in the petition on the 30th dav of July, 195k, when ar ] h lLewie honama + , 4 a oS ‘ e De | Ss, ame the highest hidder upon said property at . » and that your ommissioner held is > it 4 the ! f 4, of oner | his deposit in the sum of 10% of € amount -\ ° * and + + ‘ : : » UC > ohh, and that now your Commissioner reports that A nat Y 1a after tho wt wa oe 3 : : nT ver ene orizinal sale and report of your Commissioner, your sommis oner ’ skit as : 9 “te Ae Neadrick, has recdved an upset or a higher bid than the 4 y + } “ s ec al report R .. Redn 4 + + fr 4) 0 d « ©. Redmond, in the amount of $484.00, an tna tne said B. Ce Redmond hac de re ° . . Ad at ia “wwOnag naS deposited with your Commissioner, 10% of said d, to-wit: $#18.10 7 oueesss and that said upset bid and deposit were made to your ’ . ° 4OMMISS ner 3 +h 2», 4 S10n I W] LN1r the ten rl ner GavS as allowed by law and that your Commission now proposes to re-advert fea se said property for sale as prescribed by law This th ‘“ 11S the hth dav of Aumist, 105L, R. A. Hedrick. ...— Commissioner yorTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY city of Staesville, a municipal | corporation, Plaintiff VS william Butler and spouse, Mrs. I. B. jones and spouse, John H, Butler and spouse, and James A. Butler, Jr. and spouse, being the children of the j late James A. Butler, and all other ersons claiming any interest in the \ lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, i Defendants " THIS PROCEEDING coming on to be heard vpon the reports of R. A. Hedrick Commissioner, and it appearing to the Cort that on the 30th day of Julv, 054, said Commissioner reported to the Court a sale at public auction after an advertisment as required by law to H. 8B. Lewis of Lots 18, 19, and 20 in Block D of the North Statesville Land Company as shown on a rap as the same is recordedin Deed Book 15 at pare 754, Iredell County Registry, and as more = 9 particularly described in the Petition filed in this cause and as wi'’l rore - LE! CWfi\e fully appear from said Commissioner's report, at the price of $440.00; and it further appearing to the Court that within the ten days allowed by law an advance hid was filed with the Court by B. C. Redmond in the sum of $484.00, and a deposit of ten per cent (10%) upon said bid or $42.40 was deposited by nim with the said Commissioner as required by law and a former order of this ourt ¢ Ty wid y ian *» 18 now ordered that said Commissioner re-sell said land at publ aucti 0 : _ se aby iy even at the Corthouse door for cash under an opening bid of $484.00, aft : ater advertisement as required by law. This the 5+h le Oth dav of August, 195L. c n o Ve Ue Smith 7 Clerk of the Superior Court NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY - ee », VOmmisSsioner, under and hy vy; , id by virtue of an order and decree of the Superior Court of 0 : superior vourt of Iredell County made in a tax foreelos ure proceeding entitled "Citv of Statesy; ici k ntitled "Cc of otatesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintirs ’ Wirt Tate, $7 ce cael open Meo. Tt. 8 } a l ier and spouse, Mrs. I. B. Jones and Spouse, John H, But) . er and spouse, and James A. Butler and Spouse, being the children of the lat Ae Butler and a]1 the srson e im? : » and all othenpersons claiming any interest in the lands 2scribed in the Comnlai ni 1.’ 3 NY mt) vOmpiaint, and Iredell County, North Caroli na, Defendants" a Mines oo IO" > e 30th dav of Julv. ] 4, offer for sale the land hereinafter ANU WHSnGAS, at the time aforesaid H. B. Legs of Iredell County ae North Caroline tA) AP Pan. cue sce } ; na, id offer and bid to the undersigned the sum of $440.00 for nid opertv: and wher as ia. 6 +4 } I + whereas, within the time allowed by law anAdvanced bid with the Mndaerciensa ; 3) 0 I - Undersigned in the sum of $484.00 by one B. G. Redmond deposit haine : lepos e’ne made by him as required by law: ANU WO! BAO, + hea C7 ark Ff +h sayy 4 fv ; 0 € superior Court of Iredd1 County issued an order lated the Sth aA a rae? Qé ( ¢ ‘ : xy £ sime r ° . ry . , Nn dav oF August, 1954, directine the Commissioner to under a state tiesiae |< Mee te iaer an opening d of $484.00: C8 EEE MASS UNAer and by virtue of said order of the Clerk of the ouperior Conr+t gf ric Our C lredel] IOUNntyY +} vy, the undersigned Vommissioner will offer for oO ® ail » le under said opening bid at ouhis pening bid at public auction to the highest bidder for cash at the Court house doo + 4UPron Se da . tat 3vi ] N c n Statesy lle, Iredell County, North rarolina, at 12:00 tat ny 4£e0UU O'Clock con Oo +} a INC } n ha @ <7 r 2 : n day of September, 1954, the following described property located s ‘ . we VU yeqd LY) a re <2 my . i “ ebatesville Township, Iredell County, North Carolinas rE RETNA a INU all of lotr ee F a Land Company og ce OSs. 18, 19, and 20 in Block D of the North Statesv)** Iredell County. Noon ou map or file in the Regiser of Deeds office ° 15 at page 75," For as Said map being recorded in Deed Book and the deed of Mra eae” complete description see the map aforesai riipe Ald rt 7 : of I tice Daywauld to J. S. Kerr dated the 15th day f May ” ] 907 an . REgistry, |’ “"¢ recorded in Deed Book 35 at page 512, Iredell County This propet 1 Pety has } ; ie fendant Iredel] Tan platted and mapped both by the plaintiff ane the to on said abe in tha Lente is that same property known and referred Clerk and Treasurer .. ©. 1¢e of te plaintiff's City Tax Collector, also mapped by the defari ee, 26? Block #, lots Nos. 9, 10, and il, a County Manager's ores. cant Iredell County and recorded in its Th 3 its page 38, Block B, lots Nos. 9, 10, and ll. ‘nat at the t; oe Mae OF , the highest h such sale the undersigned Commission will require oe ae ee ee he idder + or to mak aah make & cash deposit with hin of ton per cent (106) she highest bid, This the ene Sth day of or Avgust, 1954, R,. A. Hedrick R. A. Hedrick Commissioner ORTH CAROI INA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1REDELL COUNTY ney of Statesville, a municipal sone ? Plaintiff coporation, | -Vs- ' i v:)]iam Butler and spovse, Mrs. 1. B. J6nes and spouse, sins oe 4, Butler and spouse, and James A. Butler, ets and } COMMISSIONER'S spouse, being the children of the late James A. utler, shall other persons claiming any interest in the lands | jescribed in the Complaint, and Iredeil County, North farolina Defendants j Cc. G. SMITH ITH ae ‘ CT ERK ? TUE cHIpReRTy YOUR T ro THE HON( RABLE GC. Ge &! CLERK OF THE SUPERIO! JUUNLS 3 ¢ - The undersigned, R. A. Hedrick, heretofcre appointed by this Court Commissioner for the sale of the land described in the Petition, reports tc the Court the following: That actine under said order and after due advertisement as required law and the terms cf said order, he offered the land described in the Petitior for sale at public auction for cash at the docr of the Courthouse, in Statesville, North Carolina, at noon on the 30th dav of July, 1954, when ard whee H. B, Lewis hecame the last and highest bidder in the sum of $3440.00. IT] a That an advanced bid in the amount of 10% of the original bid, to-wit: YY An . nA Dr s $ + + laure 744.00, was made upon said property by one 3B. C. R“dmond, within the ten days of the criginal sale, and that said property was re-advertised for sale as ffered said “aw in such cases made and provided, and that your Commissioner o Property for sale at the Courthouse door at noon onthe #th day of September, 195) oh 3 > “724, for cash, to the highest bidder, and at said sale on the &th day of T “eptember, 1954, John H. Butler became the last and hichest bidder upon said pro e t ® £ \ ey 4 ; j it in mePerty, at $725.00, and that your Commissioner now holds a deposit in t amount of 4 : $ i bei cunt of 10% of said bid, to-wit: $72.50, said deposit being made by vohn B, Butler, III ‘hat your Commissioner verily believes that said price is fair and adequate and rv . Said land, WHER Dr + SKEPORE, your Commissioner respectfully recommends to the Court that if ** NO ady ; i ance bid be made within ten days as by law allowed said sale be a Pproved 8nd confirm ed. This the 8th day of September, 195i. R. A. Hedrick Commissioner 1S as much as he couldreasonably expect to receive from the sale aii i PR « if, oly ee eae dh anc a Un "H CAROLI? 1 [REDELL COUNTY N N THE SUPERIOR COURT City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff ‘illiam Butler and spouse, Mrs. I. B. Jones and spouse, ohn H. Butler ans spovse, and James A. Butler, Jr. and Spouse, being the children of the late James A. Butler OR QRDR: and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands lescribed in the complaint, and Iredell County, N. Cc, Defendants S proceeding coming on to he heard upon the report of R. A, Hedrici i4 . e Hedrick, ‘armmiaeationar anda ++ nro + a + fy C a sic , and appearin o the Court that on the Pth day of September a4, said Commissioner reported to the Cou bli por 1 to the Court a sale at public auction after advertisement as ran 4s red by law to John H. Butler, of the land as lescrihed in the etitian +h ye 4 279 ) ia I on, at e price of $725.00: that said report has ‘Or ten days and no advance bid has been made and no obiectior C ered to said salee “nm: Giese” § $ ‘ ny ‘ ‘ 1id sa and a n said report, said Commissioner recommended icinds tas : 7 . I a 329 } «47 nfs A Said Sale ode cor rmed: and it further appearing to the Court fror Said report and from proof o . , . re and “rom proof offered that said price is fair and adequate and that .s Pia Duce, 2s 1 ° A > OY nea ect - ” cr ral ee . + . es nterest of all parties that said sale he confirmed: and it further appeaine that the owner of said porpertv became the last and highest bidder and that John H. Butler now holds all the title to the property nh questior Ject to this tax or claim suit, and tht he is the last and nest bidder and said Commissioner recommends tht said sale he confirmed: Lt 3 now ordered, adjudved, and decreal that the said sale be and the same : S he ret vy oin e recn ait respects approved and confirmed and that said sommissioner he and he : } i 4 and S hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliv to the purchaser a ~ A me : : 4 Cod and sufficient deed for said land upon the receipt by him of said Purchase pricae $ il] vease price: and that the funds so received bv him he wil: IaAY OVer to tha fs pa \ oe ha + fr 0 I ne City S ate vill s o ‘ : d ( vratesville, in fnll and complete satisfaction an I ayn ent of ai } ee} oe ele © Faxes, Street assessments, and liens due the Citybf Statesville p] te tf ° ™ = 4 . air i r 7 + oe : j ioner : » in the amount of $376.83, and that the said Commiss’™ + her pay to the a Pere ne LFOoUntVv of Ir j o" tredell, defendant, any and all taxes due said /Ounty in the amount of 557 .L4 : in full satisfaction and discharge of the vounty of Iredell aca; avainst said Property, and that said Bommission pay all the cost of gaiqd i ¢ a pr i i oi Proceeding, including Commissioner's fee, in the Smeny : 2® Of the total Purchase ori : e Price, or $36.25, and the balance of said purchee to the pr 4AVUO a \ - Pp y - 2 u I LUne a I | CE a e e i? ne ame nts 1eY eto ore s | Ow iers ¢ $a] MA pr Ope 4 mis ‘Nis 30 day of ¢ ay © veptember, 195) “ -*e 3m4 C, Ge Smith —_—onrt Clerk of the super a a a ee (4004 : “ORTH CAROLINA ‘aEDELL COUNTY 4 srolina Farm Equipment vompany, Plaintiff VS. william L. Charles, r LH y b Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith ‘erk of Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion hv the Plaintiff for -_ ‘dement against the Defendant by default final: oo ‘ph And it appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint : a g a. ® Van . Oc Summons issued in this action on the 24th dav of March, 1955 And it further appearing to the Court that the said Summons, together with a copy of said Complaint,was served on the Defendant on the 2/th day of ‘ } E& March, 19553 And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer or other pleading has been filed bv the Defendant, And no extensior of time to file pleading has heen cranted and that the time within which such pleadings may be filed has expired: And it further appearing to the Court from tha verified Complaint that the cause of action consists of breach of an express contract to pay a sur o! toney fixed by the contract, to wit, the sum of SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY SIX AND LA / pe ({4s¢n . . i c 105 ; 4°/100 DOLLARS (8674.44), with interest thereon from March 25, 1955, until paid at the rate of 4%: nd it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that e Plaintiff claims the rizht to the possession of the following articles of personal propenty: 1 Avery Tractor, Serial No. 1296021 1 Avery Cultivator 1 Athens Disc Plow 3@rber chairs and such fixtures and barber equipment as contained 3 in barber shop of William L. Charles. ; “ order : : te that it may sell the same as provided in a certain chattel mortgage execut h ted by the Defendant on November 1, 1954, duly recorded in Chattel “Ortvare R ‘ 8° 800k 240 at Page 339, Irgell County Registry, and that ancillary to thi v1 g§ acti Pa i ‘ on the Plaintiff caused to be issued Claim and Delivery papers for Said Property anq now has sam e in its possession; AW eo < ' 4 ‘ tin *, A a NEC aa ES atts Hz NOW, THEREFORE, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the P} aint iff have and recover of the Defendant the sum of $676.14 with interest thereo, March 25, 1955,3; that the personal property above described be sol oS et ir i Auction, for cash, to the highest bidder at said Sale to be h ld e mT. ‘HE OFFICE OF THE CAROLINA FARM EQUIPMENT COMPAN AROLINA FARM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, after Posting Notice Sale as provided in General Statute 1=339.18, and to that end 44 sv u n ‘ is appointed Commissioner of t ‘ pp the Court and directed to Sell the reinadDove provided, and credit the amount received therefron rom, tS of sad sale, upon the monetary judement herein rende ' 7nt ne ered: spp recover of the Defendant the cost of this action 1955. ni ala Ge GU Smith Clerk Superior Court SUPERIOR COURT Troy Lith it alantic yraewhound f iat ( 1} 1icund A . orporation and Vernon Odell Blackman, Defendant 1S causecominge on to he heard, and heinge heard before the Honorable Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearins tec the Jourt : ‘ . > : our ion was instituted in the Superior Court of Iredell Count ii wm t™ 5 j ] i ina, on February 12, 1955, by the issuance o! Summons and the filings verified Complaint; that thereafter in apt tine of the Summons and Complaint were served on both the Defendants it further appearine to the Court from the statements of counsel for E parties, that a settlement has heen reached regarding all the matters . things set forth and alleged in the Complaint: that under the terms 2% Settlement, the Plaintirr is to have and recover of the Defendarts the si” f Bo Hoy Ot Four Hundred and One Dollars and Twentv Cents ($401.20), together 7 the costs of this action to he taxed by the Clerk of Court. CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: bu That t, - 4n+4 : he Plaintiff have and recover of the Defendants the sum pf ‘our Hundre ) dred and One Dollars and Twenty Cents (4401.20); and the D ; x “ , ~ “ 4 a ea endar 8 e taxed Ww sh he cos S vigned, entered and f iled in the office of the Clerk of the Superior, North Carolina, Court in Statesville re on May hy 1955. C. G. Smith ae ” ~ t Consented to: Clerk of the Superior Cour ieee Oo. Chamb] Attorney for laintit? cer anne Attorneys for eee atanber nts ***¢ een netnen ee ee 8 JoT “eRe CAROLINA P, Me REID, PLAINTIFF VS. y. Ae BRISTOL AND yABEL Le BRISTOL, fe ee ee This cause coming on to be heard before tne the May Tem of Court at Wilkes County, North Carolina, Court that a mofion to set aside and vacate a judgment of Superior Court on the 20th day of September, 1916, Court of Wilkes County on January @L, 1955, at that time the Court enter 1 order directing said judgment as contrarv to law. It further appears to the Court that the Plainti appeal to the ruling of the Court and the Supreme Court, of North Carolina and the cause, affirmed the ruling of the presidi Mette 49) 6 It further appears to this Court that the appeal of this case should now be dismissed and that the order directi of the said judement from the records of Wilkes and Iredell carried out as contained in the original judgment herein. It is, therefore, ordered and decreed that the appeal It is further n ordered that the judgment of Mrs. P. Administratrix of P M. Reid vs. Mabel L. Bristol, dated Septemb and transcripted and recorded in Iredell County in Judgment Book ‘h7, is hereby set aside and striken from the records. It is further ordered that a copy of this judgment be transcripted to ‘redell County to “ad the end that the judgment now recorded in Judgment Book 9 at ‘ wrour + Page 247 shall be cancelled and removed as a cloud upon any property that e De endant may own, Signed this 4 dav of May, 1955. Je Ae Rousseau Judge Presicing NORTH CAROLIN WILKES COUNTY certify’ Cora Candill, Clerk of Superior Court of Wilkes County, do eee May temasas the above is a true and correct copy of judgment entered ab tae » 4955 Wilkes County Superior Cort. Cora Caudill Clerk Superior Court SEAL Bk 57 . eee ek Ke Ke Re OK Pea nes —— v#6011 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY 141134 VOL J ar. Plaintiff Adrinistratrix S £8State 4isie MAES ee ee ee te LutherAllen Arndt Summers . , To J Defendant his cause coming on to rmeant Of noaonee + i \ > . y > ‘ 2 ai \ ee (DE misse 3+ he cost of th } a») 5 " ‘ c 4 a : - . fie Jif } ( v Ol mai , T TAY Dy , Lt ALO ) n fo] \ ) choser ‘ > ) Henry Loon : ‘ . / sia de . . Alo } Varncrn 7 T) 7 : ” wld ne pia ntiff and Oomplaint ANOWL AS Yes Se 2% Did the défendnt Separate and apart for in the ie Complaint? ALT . arty ANSWER ¢ Yes Has the Plaint ;PH heen } for more than six he heard de fendant Separdr Et ree need a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT upon motion of the plaintiff for ERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the action be defendant which has been paid. llowing jury of 12 eood and lawful men were sworn and empaneled to try said cause: Fred Ha rt j nson We F > Aus { j n , or. Peter : aval Lee Hefner Thomas O. Clark Luther R. Wineharger Clyde S. Huffman Cletus 6. ‘a Claude Townsend Carroll fist: Iw So Us 1G Tr A intermarrv as alleged in the from the plaintiff and have they lived a period of two years or more as alleged a resident of the State of North Carolina eintind caine preceding the filing of this Complaint? ANSWER: Yes . JUDGMENT This ’ i cing heel # | Cause coming On to he E Superi Perior Court of Catawha County rresiding and a jury, and th ‘ a“ d CS Su nN Lve ; Au i 4 a oO br t a ¢ T 3 e V I ¢ appears in the record: the plaintiff and against the defendant, heard and being heard at the May Term, béfore His Honor, J. C. Sudisill, Judge Jury having answered all the issues It is, therefore, rhe same are, jivoree from the defendant. This the Oth day of May, 1955. iORTH CAROLINA COUNTY UUUiNd 4 CATAWBA I, P..W. Deaton, Clerk Superior Court of Catawta retofore existing between the plaintiff and the de hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the herehyv said court being a court of record and havine an official seal, nereto affixed, do hereby certify that the foregoing of divorce iudament in the matter of as taken from and compared with the original on file in the Clerk of Superior Court and recorded in CONNIG WN Minute Docket Witness mv hand and official seal of office at this the 10th dav of May, 1955. Hunice W. Manney, Ass't. Clerk Superior Court Catawba County North Carolina x % SS: 2 eR SR Se FSTELA NORTH CAROLINA roi IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY i, He MCELWES & WIFE : NAttar _ io sei , ° DOIGLAS P. MCELWEE : JUDGMENT st AL, i is Ex Parte ° This cause was submitted to the wndersigned Presiding Judge under the Dee “claratory Judement, Act, for the purpose of determining whether or not a Cartas eral wrt 2 rs 1 e " paper writing offered for probate as the Last Will and Testament 0! Miss Mamie Maw mie Mc#lwee deceased is her last will and testament. All of Miss 0 determine whether or The Ire : del} County with the YOnW» Quegt, was denied, and doer ment, that No. 27, Page es lewton, T ’ } ] Ce +e Q ee Tv } we Judge Presiding 7 Ne tr ] w+ } % a a Countv, North Carolina which seal is a true and correct cc AAR CHURCH > J / y AG UNUNAUN } uO vO . ve 11 Go office of the North Carolina, not Miss McElwee ded intestate. McElwee's heirs have joined in the Petition, and no the Court is of the opinion, after examining the request that it be probated in common form, which the Clerk of the Superior Court was correct in his ruling. Spute exists among the parties, their object being solely Paper writing was presented to the Clerk of the Superior Court of —— —_— - mn eae ’ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ MAY TERM, 1955 ae as ; Monday, May 23, 1955 The writing was originallv typewritten, but se it have been stricken ovt in pencil and in pen, and the names suhbstitintea ;: ed b ’ ituted in writing ip # : NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM. 1955 the typewritten part, the writing then being stricken out and Other nan : ion jb 3 Me A me instances names have heen Sttieken cu a ‘ ge YT more ith no new names inserted, the same being true as to Other Portions of Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the 8 Nee County and State Aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the parent that the original writing was drawn manv years before th. gird day of May, 1955, at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where His Honor, death of Miss McZlwee, and that upon further consideration she determined frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for this the to make chanzes in it and did so at many different times. North Carolina, Sprine Term, 1955, a é ; Inia : T)4 e + + and so many changes ' rifteenth Judicial District o and erasur appear that a phvsical inspection of the wil] makes it present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor and prosecuting mpossihle to determine what Miss McElwee's wishes were, and the Court Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is 4 concludes that the many chases and erasures indicate that she had abandoned present and prosecuting in the name of the State. Je Co. Rumple, High Sheriff F thought: of the wetednw es eiemait aan will, and that jn effect she of Iredell Covwnty is present and opened Court by Order of the Court. i seithaceted! eupecdea ey eee it, this being done-by ‘the pullin J. C. Xumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court J ator h 12% the names of the following sood and lawful men te serve as Jurors for this ae " therefore concluds S, and thereupon holds that the paper writing ee re ee Oe the First weska A S net the Last Will and estament of Miss Mamie McElwee, deceased, and W, &. Gant ee eee — ert t sk } ntestate, John P, Godfrey A. G. Honeycutt his dement is gzned ont of term and out of the District pursuant s. R. Benfield ae re wthai r r all parties to the action. Robert L. Massey Ralph Benfield t the 26th dav of Mav, 195h. ; : Albert A. Nash GC. &. Morrow J. Will Pless, dr. Lionel C, Kellen H. W. Parks J. Will Pless, dt. ode Steele i eal ha JUDGE PRESIDING Roy R. Tomlin Thomas E. Barker oe = "3 ’ % x J. He Jordan H. Brown Je K. Goble C. W. Gatton James E. Lowrance A. F. Readling Robert C. Garrison C. W. Brown Reid Billings W. P, Payne Bobby J, Lipe R. L. Miller John Lai] W. F. Menster J. C. Sowers fl Allen M. Brawley a. C, West Burl W. Mann #. E. Harwell James Robert Atwell W. E. Gant is deceased, . W. Brown is deceased, h Robert L, Massey is a non-resident. ’ ai a wNo. 189] State vs Coyte Houston W-2) YNo. 1890 State vs George Harris C=45 “No. 1900 State vs John T. Click i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ MAY TERM, 1955 Monday, May 23, 1955 ~~ DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called & failed, T x ; Judoment, Ni Fa & Capias Instanter. Nist Sei NITH DEADLY WEAPON Capias. & NON-SUPPORT ved under former order, NON-SUPPORT Capias. oO 41 T DISORDERLY vapias. THA SPEEDING Defendant called & failed. Judgment Nisi Sei ra & Capias Instanter. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT Alias Capias. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Judement complied with. Case off. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT 4 Sei “a Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Se "a and Capias Instanter. wt POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Alias Capias, POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Continued under former order. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEBK ---- MAY TERM? 1955 MONDAY, MAY 23, 1955 Mow 1925 State vs _ achert Preston Weatherman W-59 Charles Henrv Knox vo, 1973 State v8 Sam King vile, 1979 State vs James Carr 0-27 Alo, 1OBR & ORO State ae Wanda Jean Henderson ¥-19 alos. 2050 & 205] State vs nha Ulysses Icenhour ee o/#- nessa x whe DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED It appearing to the Court that at the May Term, 1954, of this Court the defendant was given a prison term of FOUR (4) MONTHS on the roads as provided by law, which prison sentence was susperded for a period of FOUR {4) YEARS on the following conditions: (1) That he pay a fine of $200.00 and the cost and not violate anv of the laws of this State, to be paid by July 5h, and it now appearing to the Court and Our't finding as a fact that the defendant has wilfully violated the terms of this judgrent, in that he has not paid the fine and cost. It is therefore ordered that commitment issue to the end that the defendant be required to serve the sentence heretofore imposed. BASTARDY Continued under former order. LARCENY OF AUTO Defendant called & Fa & Capias Instanter. ABANDON AND NON-SUPP Alias Capias. DRIVING DRUNK & DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED The defendant enters a plea of guilty to a charge of Drivine Drunk and Drivine After License Revoked. The Judement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of EIGHT (8) MONTHS to be assigned to do labor on the public roads of the state as provided by law, in No. 2051. In No. 2050, the judgment of the Court is that the defendant. be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS to assigned to do labor on the public roads of the State as provided by law. This sentence to commence after the expiration of the sentence in No. 2051, and by consent of the defendant this prison term is suspended for a period of THRE (3) YEARS on the following conditions: (1) That he pay a fine of $100.00 and the costs of this action. , : (2) That he remain of food behavior and not violate anv of the laws of this date, particularly the Motor Vehicle Law. In the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this Judement, Capias and Commitment to issue, DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa & Capias Instanter. -No. 20°00 State rs Harold G. Moore No. 2108 & 2100 otate vs James William Campbell] W=20 T S tah H4 1 ] wO. 2184 State vs Robert McClelland Al} June Banks C-21 vNos. 2212 & 2213 state Ho . D. r nenrv Russell Foote V-23 Mowt rav Allas ee ee ce <<“ Xe a EN ON SS ee Se ee FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1055 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, May 23, 1955 RECKLESS DRIVING Defendant called and failed, Defendant appeared and showed 70 Continued under former order, Instanter Prore.. od behavior, e "QartTmn AQQAU Li Alias Capias. LARCENY Judgment complied with. Case off, TM ww ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Judgment complied with. Case off, DRIVING DRUNK Continued. DRIVING DRUNK & DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED Alias Capias. FORGERY BY ENDORSEMENT Alias Capias. NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE & DRIVING DRUNK The Judgment.of the Court is that the defen- dant be confined in the ccmmon jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS to be ass to do labor on the public roads of the State ; provided by law, in No. 2213. By consent of tr defendant and at his specific request hiss term is suspended for a period of TWO (2) Year On the following conditions: sts (1) That ho pay a fine of $150.00 and the cos’ of this action. (2) That he remain of good behavior violate any of the laws of this State. In the event the defendant violates any ane Seeae of this Judgment, Capias and - U issue, In No. 2212, Judgment of the Court is that OO defendant be cin tinad cn the common jail of er County for a term of SIXTY (60) DAYS to _ aa to do labor on the public roads of the po fter Provided by law. This sentence to commence * 22}. the expiration of the sentence imposed in ‘THO This sentence is suspended for a period a (2) YEARS on the following conditions: Si: (1) That he pay a fine of $25.00 and tae of this action. — In the event the defendant violates any terms of th i issue, is Judgment, Capias & Comm net guv and not - itmen ieee The defendant enters a plea of guilty. NOS» 2241 & 22h2 State vs William Goosby Alias William Taft Fleming and Mack Wood Jo. 22,6 State vs Eugene Jones Alo. 2243 State vs j Willia Lee Plummer No . 221° State vg Willie H. Davis No. 22kk State vS Willie Lee Goss —No. 22L5 State vs T 1.) } John Hobert Mvers Alo, 2282 State vs Leon Norris Sharpe Alo, 228k, State vs William Olly Glaspy Alo. 2217 ' State vs James Lee Brown Alo. 2311 State vs John L, Morris Ho, 221.8 State vs Thomas Hudson, Jr, lo, 2250 State vs David Jonathan Clark lo. 2251 State vs Rather Scott Ce << <<< SM << ee ne NN <A Se —— Se ME A IN THE SUPEROR COURT RST WEEK ------ MAY TERM, 1955 . Mondav, May 23, 1955 BURGLARY A True Bill. DESTROY PERSONAL PROPERTY A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A 7 m4 A rue. Bill. FORGERY A Trve Bill. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAP( JI aR 1rne Cit. LARCENY A True Bill. + ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH A True Bill. FORGERY A True Bill. LARCENY A True Bi zy * CRIME AGAINST NATURE (SODOMY) A True Bill. CRIME AGAINST NATURE (SODOMY) A True Bill. INTENT TO KILL p—4 3 = - ~s = Se te re errr Seeragetmieetes st tne sbeeasninanaietes aba sonia se IN THE Be eee ei ST WEEK -------MA + 4 se Monday, May 23, 1955 IN THE SUPERDR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ MAY TERM, 1055 Monday, May 23, 1955 © & 2310 } POSSESSION OF BURGLARY TOOLS | ASSAULT & ROBBERY los. 2309 i A True Bill. | A tue Bill. State ‘ } vs Jr | jckelsimer Y surene 2uSstle } Clyde (NMN) ss ¢ , } and Wayne Haywood Brooks } ASSAULT & ROBBERY j A True Bill. 6 } FORGERY i wo. 2299 } A True Bill. | State \ vs : { Jonn L. Morris 1 ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO KILL ' A True Bill, to, 2265 } LARCENY OF AUTO { a ee ) m True Bill. 1 Souther } State i vs georze Dwight Hollard ! 225¢ | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Wawa ad IRGERY ! A irnue cen, { Alo. 226k — ies R31) 1 Oe ne } A iTrue Btit. ee ie ee, i otate James Johnsor | vs ' a i Everett Raeford Adams \ ‘dward lliams j . sa 70R OER 29 Nica sia a dio. 2261 { FORGERY ae 22 tEAKING & ENTERING State | A True Bill. } A True Bill. vs ) r + Everett Raeford Adams } vames ohnson } : ee iward Si tien Alo. 2260 | FORGERY State ) A True Bill. vs { { BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY ; Everett Raeford Adams { { A True Bill. Sis Meats Alo. 2259 { FORGERY State { A True Bill. vs { ! LARCENY OF AUTO dverett Raeford Adams { A True Bill, } veorse Dwictht Holland | lo. 2242 } FORGERY State j A True Bill. nT c vs } 0 go" Tm ween nr Uri? A m ¢ WIT 1G Ev a ae | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A PISTGL Everett Raeford Adams | “nee | A True Bill, Narvey rropst ! “110.2263 ) FORGERY ota’ { A True Bill. No. 2277 ’ vs \ wNO» PO wien: ie . ser WAT\ bl Everett 2 Siar, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A PISTOL erett Raeford Adams i A True Bill, VS Harvey Propst STTRT ‘No, 2197 § } ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A SHOT SUN ae 4 A True Bill. vs N Lr ‘State | LARCENY OF AUTO ‘larence Houston ve ! A True Bill. 2° | “a ad } CONSPIRE TO BURN BUILDING te Continued for the defendant. “No. 230) State Vs William Larry ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT 10 ™ A True Bill, a © B. Stat #59 taton Charles << los. 2218, 2210 : : DRIVING DRUNK: ‘9 2219, & 2220 : RECKLESS DRIVING: D — DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED en At the close of the evidence on adamant moves for a judgment of Non-Suit. allowed. “No, 2305 State ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT A True Bill, vs ; yaner Fred Sigmon Wilham Larry Charles Alo. 2300 _" FORGERY A TrueBil1l, vs John L, lorrig <_< a “No. 2201. & 2 State vs Laura Mae Hu No. 2250 & 2 State vs David Jonath and Eather Scott 205 nter 251 an Clark NET ala’ IREDELL UUYUN I T That 0} at fe the form of the ststute and against the 6 [AT“& OF NORTH CAROLINA oi loniously, and murder ee ey IN THE SUPEROR COURT FIRST WEEK weewce --- MAY TERM Monday, May 23, 1955." 1955 MURDER The Grand Jury returns in (eighteen present) a True Bil the defendant George Arvill § : d i ‘of Indictment Charzir, Aud offense of Murder in words an outher with the capita) d figures ag follows: SUPERIOR CouRT iT) h nay 23rd, Term, 2955 evasininy HB JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR George Arvil Souther late of the 1e lst day of May A, D. 1955, with and in the said County, unlawfully, OATH PRESENT: County Of Irede)) force and arns. wilfully, and of his malice aforethought, did kin) +b ier one Webster Volonel Lunsford contrary to : swab o sa n such case made and Provided peace and dignity of the State, Z£eb_A. Morris Solicitor, No. 2297 State vs George Arvil Souther WITNESS Mrs. Claudia W. York Shirlene York We M. Snow Mr. & Mrs. W. Ai Lowe J. C, Rumple Dr. T. V. Goode, III Those marked X sworn by the undersigned foreman, and examined hefore the Grand Jury, and this bill found, A TRUZ BILL N. L. Boggs — Foreman of the Grand Jurys POS ESS ING 49 1/2 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUGR PSSSING 49 1/2 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF SALE Continued, CRIME AGAINST NATURE (SODOMY ) fe Continued, 213 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST Jo, 2303 State vs william Larry Charles No. 2164 State vs Je C. Seott wlio. 2163 State vs Levi Parson Surles W~63 tio, 222) State vs Melvin Walter Webb 4lio, 222) State vs Melvin Walter Webb force and arms, at and in the said County, WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1955 MONDAY, MAY 23, 1955 } MURDER } The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body (eighteen present) a True Bill of Indictment x > . oO ia . n+ | charging George Arvil Souther with the capital offense of Murder in words and fizures as follows: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR TREDELL CONTY May 23 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON TH ( That William Larry Charles late of the County of . Iredell, on the 9th day of February A. D., 1955, with y, unlawfully, wilfully, felonicusly, and of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder one Robert Overcash contrary ee : the form of the statute in such case made and vrovided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. Zeb A. Morris Solicitor. No. 2303 State vs William Larrv Charles NNTOTME NT INDI! i wd YD MURDER LeTmAD aC WiLNE&OO R. E. Perkins Those marked X sworn by the unérsigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found ake A TRUE BILI N. L. Boges Foreman of the Grand Jury. ASSAULT ON FEMALE 43 stanter process. Defendant called and failed. Insta I SPEEDING fe Remanded to Recorder's Court to comply with Judemert. SPEEDING ; Defendant called and failed. Fa & Capias Instanter. % : It if Ordered by the Court that the entry here tofore be stricken out. Judgment Nisi Sci SPEEDING Remanded to Recorder's Court to comply with Judgment. FIRST WEEE. onounnees MAY TERM, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, May 23, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------- MAY TERM, 1955 Monday, May 23, 1955 ANos. 2273, 2274, 2275 ! POSSESSING 3 1/2 GALLONS NON-TAX Paqp }. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT 2276) & 2297 | POSSESSING 3 1/2 GALLONS NON-TAX paqp Le a a Pe ee cath ee cat ee Ot nolo contendere State | FOR SALE: POSSESSING NON-Tay PAID LiQuan oe state to the charge contained in the warrant, which vs { SALE AND DID SELL: ASSAULT WITH DEADLY ‘i _ Reavis plea the State accepts. Harvey Propst | WEAPON TO-WIT A PISTOL: ASSANIT | Hal Monroe ; The judgment of the Court is tl fendant L: ASSAULT WITH Dear 28 ' e judg ourt is that the defendant | WEAPON TO-WIT A PISTOL Y W--28 } be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County i Defendant called and failed. Judgment we: } for a term of TWENTY-FOUR (24) MONTHS to be | Sci Fa and Capias Tatanter. 7G8ment Nis} } assigned to do labor on the public roads of the } State as provided by law. By consent of the } defendant in open court, this priosn sentence is eNO. 2271 { SPEEDING \. | suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS ON the State } Defendant called and failed. Judgement Nis: 3} following conditions: esa { Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. ao a | (1) That he pay the cost of this action, ohn Calvin Kirby } “ { including the officer's fees for returning the ow defendant from Virginia, by the next criminal term \ of this Court or not later than the first day of Alo. 2283 SPEEDING x October, 1955. otate The Defendant enters a plea of euilty as . (2) That the defendant pay to his wife each Vs charged, : a week at least the sum of 335.00 per week for the nford Arlie Winslow The Judement of the Court is that the y support of herself and five minor children, the defendant be confined in the common 4ail of \ } first payment *o be made on Saturday, June 4, 1955, Iredell County for a term of Ehirty (30) Days ¥ and a like sum on Saturday of each week thereafter. to be assizned to do labor on the public ' Either the prosecuting witness, Mrs. Mary Reavis, roads of the State as provided by law. By ‘ or the defendant may apply to this court at any consent of the defendant this prison term is * subsequent term for an increase or decrease in the eS Ne a v suspended fer a period of One (1) Year from the rising of this Court on the following conditions: (1) That he pay a fine cf $25.00 and the cest of this action. (2) That he remain of good behavior and not violate anv of the laws of this State. In the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this Judgment during this ONE (1) YEAR period, Capias and Commitment to issue, amount of support per week. (3) That the defendant remain of good behavior and not viokte any of the laws of this State during said period of suspension, and particularly that he not drink any sort of intoxicant. (4) That he sive a bond in the sum of $200.00 for his personal appearance at any subsequent tern of this ccurt to show that he has complied with the terms of this judgment. In the event the defendant vblates any of the terms of thigiudement or fails to pav any of the roney herein provided, Capias and Commitment to issue to put the road sentence into effect at any oc 5 DAA ry fs Sli ial ia LAD ° ~ ae eet ‘ ve = aa : -aer ) POSSESSING 22 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID MAL? BEVERAS: subsequent term of this court during said five year are: | POSSESSING 22 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID MALT BEVERAG period. ec FOR SALE: POSSESSING MATERIALS FOR MANUFACTURING e a HOME BREW: MANUFACTURING HOME BREW scsi aa ania halts tt | Nol Pros with Leave. Met aa | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILA vs vtate ] The defendant is required to give a $1,000.00 wie 1 bond for his appearance at the next term of this “No. 22h5 ) FORGERY milie Hy Davis | criminal Court. tate eget . vs } "he Defendant enters a plea of euilty to lo, 2248 dun foheus us ! uttering forsed papers. "an +? LARCENY : eal Web h aoe } Judgment of the Court is that defendant or 1 The defendant enters a plea of milty to a charge : | be confined in the Central Pr’3on at Raleigh Thoma 1 | of larceny as chaved in the bill of Indictment. } for a term of not less than TwO (2) nor more Cason) udson, Jr. 4 Judgement of the Court is that the defendant a -{ than FIVE (5) YEARS to be assigned to do, tebor re ‘} confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a ! as provided by law. x term of not less than TWENTY-FOUR (2k) nor more : YN} than FOURTY-EIGHT MONTHS to be assigned to do rovided “No. 2290 | labor on the public roads of the state as p State NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE 4 by_law. va j The defendant enters a plea of guilty to 4 It is ordered that the Watch be returned to oy (None) Cheek charse of No Operator's License. ‘| Nannie Richards. w= } to, suet DRIVING DRUNK . me nme 2296 < The defendant enters a plea of guilty to a charg State DRIVING DRUNK bie of Driving Drunk, 2nd Offense. vs ! Remanded to Recorder's Court to comply with W-29° Jack Mitchell Judgement of the Court is that the defendant Ben Conger | Judgement. de : onfined in the Common Jail of Iredell County °° : confined do labor W-57 iy a term of SIX (é) MONTHS to be assigned to do on the puBic roads of the State as provided by law. Al0S. 2218 No. 2213 State.’ “#19, 2220 | RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVING DRUNK: eeate | LARCENY OF AUTO ull vs DRIVING AFTER LICENSE nares f not guilty through The defendant enters a plea of not gut luther Pred ¢ The defendant enters a plea © k Battley. a Lee Plummer | Seer eat hs Sno following Nas was swor’ Wa13 ed Signon his Attorneys Mr. John McLaughlin & Mr. ae ipanelled: Jotin P, Godfrey E. Re Benfie } Albert A. Nash Lionel Ce. ™ . G. Steele Roy R. Te J. He Jordan Je Ke ames &. Lowrance Robert { Reid Billings Bobby cca eed Alo. 2281, State vs William Ollv Glaspv C-19 No. 2293 State VS “dward Lamar Greene V-33 FIRST << Ne EO EE ae a ee ee I i ee ee EE ee RS CS ee BE ee RE ae ee RE ee ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK ----~----- MAY TERM, 1955 Mondav, May 23, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------- MAY TERM, 1955 Monday, May 23, 1955 LARCENY The Defendant enters a plea of 123 & 212k NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: RECKLESS DRIVING larceny of money over $100.00, Suilty of Joe The defendant enters a plea of guilty as charged in both cases. ; Of the Court is that the def James ‘ThorneburgZ Judgment o s that the defendant for a term of not less than TWO (2) taleich roe be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell than FIVE (5) YEARS to be assicned Or more County for a term of SIXTY (60) DAYS to be ! ! Judgment of the Court is that the d | as provided by law. This sentence i labor | assigned to do labor on the public roads of ! | ! i } s be confined in the Central Prison at efendant . suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS and the State as provided by law. By consent of the defendant is hereby placed on probation ee Cen court this prison term,in No.2124 under the supervision of the State Proba:; A cea re >. co. eee ee: TWO (2) YEARS C ans d i : : 010N ,& on the following conditions: ommission and its officers, subject to the S (1) That he pav aid e 495.00 2 conditions set out in 5 \ ee o xARe Ut SE 26y Ong Due the probation Judgment, ss cost of this action. . (2) That he remain of good behavior and not violate any of the laws of this State, particularly x the Motor Vehicle Law. oa In the event the defendant violazes any of ¥ the terms of this Judgment, Capias and Commitment se to issue. FORGERY = In No. 2124, judgment of the Court is that 4 4 f ae ° ° ~ ° j i 7 ‘ : ~ the defendant be confined in the Common Jail a needa tae eee te plea of guilty as x of Iredell County for a term of SIXTY (60) DAYS iM Tr oN 2 ll 1 oo, so to be assigned to do labor on the public roads sR a 311, let the Seen be consolidated : ‘| of this state as provided by law This sertence and the judgment of the Court is that the Oe ee, hk wenttation of the sentence defendant be confined in the Central Prison Oe aw Wes 9599 - and by consent ae cia cate at Raleish not less than TWO (2) nor more than SY hl ale gee ets hes eae Wile ae am! FIVE (5) YEARS to be assigned to do labor as TWO (Ei YEARS on Mae ht deine aondttt onset vr) . } Wy \ i iu , Av SOWITiK COT ULLODTDe provided by Law ; } (1) That he pay a fine of $75.00 and the In Nos. 2299 & 2300 let the cases and the ; ie Be *hie action ‘ sNn+ $ - duc U i WMNIS ¢& /LONe saan = consolidated, and the Judgment of { (2) That he remain of good behavior and not the Court is that the defendant be confined tts Se et Oe Saws of this State. particularly in the Central Prison at Raleich for aterm the M t r Vehicle Law pa as of not less than FIVE(5) nor nore than TEN | nee die ote Pe Tae do dindant the latee’ Way oF (10) YEARS to be assigned to do labor as 1° dis aaiceas of thie Jodewent, Capias and Commitment provided by law. This sentence is to commence 1+ ee eae rex e ’ after the expiration of the sentence in No, ee 2311, and by consent of the defendant this prison term is suspended for a period of Alo. 2271 3PEEDING FIVE (5) YEARS on the following conditions: State : Pa data enters a plea of guilty of (1) That he pay the cost of the action : 2 ve Seesding 55 .. ee ee within NINETY (90) DAYS fron his release from : John Calvin Kirhy } Judeuent of the Court is that the defendant nr 4 7 > ‘ + + = - a. prison in No. 2311. } be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County (2) That he pay into the office of the Cler on Jai ] ge: : - f + SIXT 60) DAYS to be assigned of this Court the sum of $32.00 to be dishursed for a term of SIXTY (40) DAYS sign t blicfroads of the Sate as 41. Ctwibt tn he 419 +o Glen Po to do labor on the publifoa ‘ ite nd ie tea er it FE provided by law. By the consent of the defendant aD )~U 4 i ea ve ¥ KET « . Pr .- t : 4 a9 3 (3) That. fee aoa oe se behavior and not | im open court this prison term is suspended for violate any of the Age? this State. a period of ONE (1) YEAR on the following Ao : ‘ Ce, conditions: ! (1) That he pay a fine of $25.00 and the SPEEDING a costs of this action. ia The defendant enters a plea of guilty DE sper | (2) That he remain of good behavior and not violate any of the this State, particularly the Motor Vehicle Law. In the event the defendant vbdlates any of the terms of this Judgment, Capias & Commitment to issue. . 3 o Poe iph, » Yudeuone ot the Soult is that the — be confined in the Common Jail of iredel County for a term of SIXTY (60) DAYS to be assigned to do labor: on the public ne the State as provided by law. By ie the defendant in open court this Pr) YAR . . suspended for a period of ONE 1) YE the following conditions: ‘ * (1) That he pay a fine of $50.00 and the cost of this action. se (2) That he remain of good behav* not violate any of the laws»of*thasevm or paticularly the Motor Vehicle Laws of In the event the defendant vine bass! the terms of this Judgment, Capias ® $ Commitment to issue. ee Late This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Moming, May 24, 1955, ei ne — - eee! men oblpo9 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------~-- MAY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, May 2h, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------- MAY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, May 24, 1955 No. 2133 | ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT RAPE . al & 22h2 } BURGLARY 0 : : af h jos. 2 { The defendants enter pleas of not guilty. State Continue or the term. > : , cre i State After the close of all evidence the Court vo . . ote vs i directs a verdict of not guilty. Je J. Raby 1 iilliam Goosby nee ne William Taft Fleming KT n a T TYATY Ce No. 2202 | AID AND ABETT IN DRIVING DRUNK i? | State | Continued for the term, ai Wood ! vs ’ 0226 Howard Hal Vanhoy N-1,2 peti in. 2226 } DRIVING DRUNK los 2 ) The defendant enters a plea of not guilty MNo. 2291 { SPEEDING nae } through his Attorney Mr. J. G. Lewis. rte ws : ¥ t f a} ridence the defendant State Defendant called and failed. Judgement Nis} Robert Shaw Brown t At the close of ail evidence the defendant — rs | Sei Fa and Capias Instanter ; } withdraws a plea of not guilty and enters a plea S { VW ou iUe e . te Ween aad f guilty lliam Frederick Roesel 2 erat of the Court is that the defendant be } confined in the Bommon Jail of Iredell County for N 2301. § - MURDE ASSAULT WITH DEA WEAPON wrhecta SIX (6) MONTHS to be assigned to do labor No. 2303, 230k & 2305 | MURDER: ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT -. — eat Lie teaee tet aes a provided by law ‘ men , YN A TIT mM mr p> TAD ¢ t Dw ) ) ) sis YOUALE i& Al UV LaAWe State | TO KILL: ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTEM en eee Ge rentart tie prison term is vs { TO KILL wy Conse ee Re ete eeane ne Gk aces 2 ; . f ; f TWO YEARS on the Villiam Larrv Charles | Continued for the term. ! suspended for a period 7 10 (2) YEARS } following conditions: be ears. or ) (1) That he pay a fine of $150.00 and the cost oe DAN RPTVTNA nee WpPAan f this action Sane eee DRIVING DRUNK 2nd OFFENSE is That he remain of good behavior and not otate q Continued for the term | (2 That e remain o 4 , “4 oe t ak spe, i { violate any of the laws of this State or of the Homer Cashior } } U. S. A., particularly the Motor Vehcile Law. In a { the event the defendant violates any of the terms ! of this Judgment, Capias and Commitment to issue. No. 2207 { DRIVING DRUNK hate | Continued for the term. ; eens Leroy Watson Adams j No. 2155 DRIVING DRUNK 771 0 ty Recorderts Court te State { Rimanded to Iredell County Recorder's Cou vs } comply with judgement. Bs ao Oe os , . 2 Ala + he complied w { Ylo. 2208 | DRIVING DRUNK _ James Ralph Lambert { it is ordered that the judgment be comp sade ene ete ! at this time. ‘ ota Continued for the term. fe vs i ooten j No. 2234 { ABANDON OF CHILDREN BY MOTHER ae ore ae es State { Nol Pros with Leave on payment of the costs [fc Nos . 924 sen os ib ae eee ane vs { which the Connty is liable. MNOS» 2312 & 2313 | BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Mildred C. Knox ! vtate } True Bills. vs } a LOmMmy Lee Me Crarv \ No. 2298 ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO KILI ‘ m * Ri Paul Fox A irue ata Ty one ! The defendant enters plea.cf of guilty as charged at saa vs : Bi f Indictment. Alo. 228 idiaraceeet eke et ee eae wit ! in the Bill of Indi mera: State . AID & ABETTING IN ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPCN George Arvil Souther 4 Praver for Judgement continued straign ee cat | TOAWIT A KNIFE r i vs i "oe a ) ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A SHOT GUN No. 229 id e : i 4 re 1 { ASSAULT WLTH DEADLY WEAPON TO.WIT A KNIFE ; vs . Continued _ vs | A True Bill. caries Houston | urady Beber \ / { No. 2192 State vs Billy Wilsor Shinanl Sor VLt Alias Bill Shinault Nog 2252 eo Hees & 2253 [ BBERY not ; SREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY state a Phe dotwacanne enter pleas of/guilty through their A True Bill, she Attorney Mr. J. G. Lewis, whereupon the fohlowing and | eugene Bustle Jury was sworn and impanelled: Se 9 Je Ke Goble BB. Ey beariela” Robert C. Garrison Alo. 219 Albert A. Nash Peer ete Stat ” | BREAKING, ENTERT) : Lionel C, Kellen John ai vtate 7" ay ENTERING AND LARCENY { R ds Cs Sowers ! A ; oy R. Tomlin . : True Bill, i. Ro aan ee ee ae Edward Richard g * Dh ; dict of not guilty Alias Ed Scott Sovt | hea The Jury returns a ver eack defendant. Alo. 2194 : we State | BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY a ~ vs A True Bill, ova _ Mins sta Cummings om Cummings . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---~. ~-~-- MAY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, May 2h, £955 se I! THE SUPERIOR CCURT FIRST WEEK ----------- MAY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, May 24, 1955 Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredel] County, WV State Carolina, whoseé*prisoner he is, Georkend 7 vs Souther in his own person, and the aie gyerett Raeford Adams prisoner being at the har of the Court and 0-30 Mr. John McLaughlin and Mr. w, R. Battley. Counslers for the defendant are present if Cont in behalf of the defendant, the Bill of Indictment in this case was read to him and forthwith it is demanded of him, the sata” George Arvil Souther, how he will acquit himself of the premises in said Bill of Indictment specified and chareved upon him and the said George Arvil Souther answering the Bill of Indictment aforesaid, says ha js NOT GUILTY of the felony and MURDER therein charged, and therefore, for good or evil. he puts himself upon his Country and His God and Hon. Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor for the State in his behalf, doth the like. MURDER On this the 24th day of May, A, D, } ros. 2259, 2260, 2261 FORGERY comessinto open Court, in the Cnsete: 955, there INoSe 5° 99h3, 226k The defendant pleads not guilty of forsery, but ‘vil Sonther . Trees Caste ae 2262, 2207 enters a plea of guilty of uttering forced checks in all six cases. In No. 2259, the judement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Central Prison at Raleigh for a term of not less than THREE nor more than SEVEN (7) YEARS, to be assigned to do labor as provided by law. In No. 2260. judgement of the Court is that the defendant he confined in the Central Prison at Raleigh for a term of not. less than FIVE (5) nor more than TEN (10) YEARS, to he assiened to do labor as provided by law, this sentence to commence after the expiration of the sentence No. 2259, and by consent of the defendant is suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEAKS on the following conditions: (1) That within 12 MONTHS from his release from prison in No. 2259 that he pay the cost of all of these actions. (2) That within (64) MONTHS from his release from prison in No. 225° that he pay into the NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR con Clerk "s office the sum of 3139.00, to be IhEDELL COUNTY MAY TERM 1955 disbursed by said Clerk, upon proper receipt, : $25.00 to Churchill's, Inc.3; 315.00 to Henry State ( Houghton: 935.00 to Carolina Motor Company, Inc.$ vs i o28.00 to Merrit-Pharr Clothing sompany; $15.0 George Arvil Souther ]} to Re F, Murdeck: and $21.00 to Fraley's Food Store. (3} That the defendant remain of good behavior and not violate anv cf of the United States of America. (4) That the defendant make his personal appearance at the first criminal term of this Court within (1.2) MONTHS after his release from prison in No. 2259 and show that he has paid the sums herein required. In the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this judzment at any subsequent tin during said FIVE (5) YEAR period or fails to pay t the laws of this state or The Grand Jury having returned a True Bill of Indictment, charging George Arvil Souther with the murder of Webster Colonel Lunsford in the first degree, the defendant, George Arvil Souther and his counsel, John R. McLaughlin and W, R. Battley tender to Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding, a plea of euilty of the murde: of Webster Colonel Lunsford in the first degree. This the 2hth day of May, 1955. 1 the money herein provided, capias and commitn to issue wpon motion of the Solicitor and in tna discretion of the Judze presiding. /3/ George Arvil Souther George Arvil Souther ee NE ee A f[s/___ John R. Ne Laugh}iz efendant in op John R. McLaughlin Court, praver for judgment is continued from tern to term for a period of (5) YEARS or specifically /s/ Ww. R. Battley. i — until the first Spring criminal term in 1960 ; W. R. Battley In Nos. 2262, 2263 and 22614, prayer for emer . A continued straicht. Alo. 2297 Stat | MURDER WE PSY ot . ‘ . . AAT U m iT] Ce DE ‘e ve. It appearing to the Court that the defendant, “he SIP 2266 , 2268 ) LARCENY OF AUTO: LARCENY: LARCENY OF AUTOS SPEEDING: George Arvil Souther 1 through his counsel, has tendered to the Court 4 Steve uci | NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: LARCENY OF ney ; 11 the anne ! plea of guilty of murder in the first degree, * -. 4 The defendant enters a plea of euilty in aii tne 1 provided by Gen. Statutes of N. C. 15-162e1, 2% CeOree: Deri “) cases as charged in the Bill of Indictment. ‘ | the State having, with the approval of the Cour, wig Holland) « ~¥ Gn. wos 2265, it appearing to the Court that the, | which the Court does hereby approve, accepted ") defendant is a male, white youth under 21 years 0 | plea. ; ee age who has never heretofore served any prison | Upon this plea, it is the judement of the “0 ‘| verm, it is therefore the judgment of the ae. 4 that the defendant be imprisoned for life in th _.f that the defendant be confined in the Common ne State's Prison, <} of Iredell County for a term of not less than TW (12) nor more than THIRTY-SIX (346) MONTHS to be assigned to do labor on the public roads of the State as provided by law. ; In No. 2267,,Judement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of mere of Iredell County for a term of not less than 7 (2) nor more than FIVE (5) YEARS to be assigne i. do labor on the public roads of the State as ee eee tal by law. This sentence to commence yo the expir . of the sentence in No. 2265, and is sa eee the defendant placed on probation for FIVE (5) = ee the defendant. to reimburse C. P. Vinson in the : rt $100.00, Elmer Rash in the sumof $50.00, a Wea their cars, and that he not drive a motor ¥ ee the public highways during said period of prevdtldns In Noss ante, 2 @, 2269 and 2270, prayer for = |) judgment continued straight. ie Ry Me De idea as f ; yk The facts of this case reveal that this was ® j deliberate and premeditated killing, with the Su"ficient under our law in every detail oe ihe defendant to suffer the penalty of death, a ds sentence imposed of life imprisonment under 122162.1 should never be reduced to & tem ti. vears ~ and such is the undersigned trial ™™ unalterable recommendation, bi Frrent vines | It is Ordered by the Court that the 22 Condemned and sold as provided by law. ieee ] : © be in excellent conditi a ‘ourteen (14) colored ren: ; wenty-nine (29) prisoners, At the County Home we white males (13): et of (hl). We also found Three (3) Colored ment We found the entire do recommend that We found the Pri 112 prisoners, in the Thi mittpane d Richard Scott Hd Seott w 29 William Cummines om Curmings 1~33 sa ” A >.> * 7A ‘ yay ‘% j ound Petites were conducted on We feel some thouecht cell blocks, ‘We found the Court House in fa 20 chairs he bought for the Grand 8 Ho ‘ at 9:30 otclock A. Mir FIRST WEEK --~---~ MAY TERM. tour hy ifteen found the Colored females (7) the followine prisoners: and One (1) Premises of the the Electric Inspector Son Camp to be IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a 1955 Tuesday, May 24, 1955 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Each of the defendants enters a p) tuilty as chareed, — Let the counts be consolidated, On th Breaking and Entering counts let the dere . be confined in the Common Jail of iret County for ‘a term of net less than TWENTY FOUR nor more than SIXTY (60) MONTHS to bs assigned to do labor on the publie roads of this State as provided hy law. ‘ On the Larceny county let the defendants in each of them he confined in the Centra] Prison at Raleigh for a term of not less thar THREE (3) nor more than FIVE (5) YEARS to 2 be assigned to do labor as provided by lay This sentence te commence after the expira- tion of the sentence on the Breaking and varceny Lounty and by consent of the defendant in open Court this prison term is suspended for a period of FIVE (5) Yzars on the conditions that he remain of good behavior and not violate anv of the laws of this State. In the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this Judgment, luring this five vear period, Capias and oa) : ° Lommitment to issue. sie a il Wate ai ina ema AND JURY REPORT al TE Pi. 1955 Sills of indictment on all cases presented by Spected the following County Properties? COUNTY. JAIL Deputy Grier Rimmer and found the jail Ne found the following prisoners: (15) white men, making a total of COUNTY HOME following inmates: White females (17)! : Colored males (4): making a total Three (3) White mens Colored woman. County Home in ecod condition, but inspect the wiring. PRISON CaMP in excellent condition with a total of should he tiven to a more adequate heating system COURT HOUSE irly good condition, but do recommend che Jury Room, L ‘ S, - be Bogs until Wednesday Moning, Wednesday, Nose 2309 & 2310 State ciyde (NNN) Pickelsimer, Jr. and : Wayne Haywood Brooks No, 229k State vs e 5 William Frederick xoese No, 216k State vs Jive Seott C-31 Now 22h4 State Vv § Willie Lee Goss C~22 No, 2133 State vs Jy J, Raby Mos. 2254 & 2257 state vs J Say We ne Sdward Williams A ee aes , ppere a A A A I MC NC ME + FA, Leesce IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -~---- -- MAY TERM, 1955 eMay 25, 1955 e 4 of as ss as POSSESSING BURGLARY TOOLS Both of the defendants enter a plea of not guilty throuch their Attorney, Mr. John J. Mahonev, dr. After hearing all the evidence the Jndee allowed a Non-Suit. SPEEDING The defendant enters a plea of guilty of speeding 55 mpn in a 45 mile zone. The judement of the Covrt is that the defendant be confined in the common iail of Iredell County for a term of SIXTY (40) DAYS to be assigned to do labor on the public roads of the State as provided bv law. v consent of the defendant in open Court, this prison term is suspended for a period of TWO (2) YEARS ON the following conditions: (1) That he pav a fine of 525.00 and the costs of this action. (2) That he remain of cood hehavior and not violate anv of the laws of this State, and particvlarlv that he not operate a moto truck over 45 mph any where in North Carolina. In the event the defendant violates any of the terms of this Capias & Commitment to issue. Judgement, ASSAULT CN FEMALE The defendant enters a plea of cuiltv as charced. : The jiudement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Tredell County for a term of NINE (9) MONTHS to he assigned by the Commissioners to do work in and about the Countv Institutions as they may direct: and specifically at the Jail. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCHI The defendant enters a plea of not euilty, whereupon the following Jurv was sworn and impanelled: Charles &. Isenhovr J. Ke. Neill A. G. Honeyeutt Ve P. Payne Ralph Benfield Re Ce ire C. E. Morrow Re Le Miller H. W. Parks We F. Menster Allen M. Brawley 3url W. Mann The Jurv returns a verdict of net guilty. tm ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT RAPE Off by abetment. arn BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY: ee & ENTERING The defendant enters a plea of guilty 4s charced, Let the counts be consolidated. The Judement of the Court 18 that the eee be confined in the Central Prison erie e a for a term of not less than THREE (3) nor SEVEN (7) YEARS to be aoazgned to lahor as rovided by law. in Ne. 2 » 3 In No. 2257, by consent of the Gea in open court, prayer for judement pe: Mes until the next term of this Criminal . ec Stee mee ee See ee i me a ee IN THE SUPERIOR cOURT FIRST WEEK --------. MAY TERM 1955 Wednesday, May 25th, 1955 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of Suilty of bo ta ae papers and knowing the sane to be stolen, through his att tp Battley. : ee Judement of the Court is that be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell] County for a term of SIX (4) MONTHS te be assigned to do labor on the public roads of the State as provided by law. LARCENY OF AUTO Judgment of the Court is that the defendant he confined in the common jail of Iredell e County for a term of SIX (£) MONTHS to be assigned to de labor on the public roads of this State as provided by iaw. NC OPERATOR'S LICENSE By consent of the defendant in open Court, prayer for judgment continued. Nos . the defendant Kos. 2281 & 229) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ST WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1955 oe Wednesday, May 25, 1955 DRUNK: LOUD AND PROFANE LANGUAGE The defendant enters a plea of state ' eases. vs : cau] doseph Fox 2279 & 2280 State vs Paul Fox and Mwady Reber the defendant be confined in the Lt in open Court, this sentence is of THREE (3) YEARS on the (1) That he pay the cost (2) That he pay into the c Court the sum of $35.00 to be Hospital fer.the hospital hill and the further sum of-$116.10 tc anv of the laws of this State or « Sommor County for a term of not less than to he assigned to do work on the publ State as provided by law. By consen prosecuting witness for lost time. (3) That he remain of good behavior and Consolidated with No. 2281 for judement. AID AND ABETTING IN ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEai A KNIFE: ASSAULT WITH DBADLY WEAPON The defendants enter pleas of not gu As to Grady Beber, judgment of the LU=W $1 +. wnt r pry ins (12) MONTHS roads of defendant In the event the déferndart violates any of this judgment or fails to pay the money provided, Capias and Commitment to issue. AS to Paul Joseph Fox, this case is consol with Nos. 2279 and 2280 for jiudemant, and t : of the Court is that the defendant be confined Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Nc than TWELVE (12) MONTHS to’ be assigned to do lat on the public roads of this State as provided by law. <— e ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A PISTOL WITH INTENT TO KILL Continued. "2 ee wer Get gas vr Teac 4 0 > a + ry By consent of the defendant in open court this prison sentence is suspended for a period of TW (2) YEARS ON the condition that he pay the cost of these ‘ ’ SSL Bi aed pee ee et actobns and that he remain of good behavior and not violate anv of the laws of this State or of the BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of guilty as in bothicases. 2312, jiudment of the Court is that _defendant be confined in then Gemmess J9tay [redell County for a term of /EIGHTESN 18] nor more than SIXTY (40) MONTHS to be assigned No. 2272 ee ee ee Ee ee Se ee ee ee ee ee Ad V a te de labor on the public roads of this vtate as provided by law. In No. 2313, judgement of the Court is that State vs Hoyle Cleveland whi the defendant be confined in the Central W~3), rrison at Raleich for a term of not less than THREE (3) nor more than FIVE (5) YEARS to be assigned to do labor as prcvided by law. Mo. 2278 SPEEDING his sentence to commence after the expiration State sare of the sentence in No. 23]2. This sentence vg iS suspended for a period of FIVE (5, YEARS John Melvin Derr, Jr, On the conditions that he remain of good W-37 behavior and not violate any of the laws of this State, ; bs In the event the defendant violates any © NOs 2285 & 2286 SSAULT ON FEMALE: JLARCE the terms of this Judement Capias and State Mamie gre LARC 1 } i { : ! ' i : i ' { ! i Continued. Ve Commitment to issue. Mack W “30k Woods i Q Wo. 21194 } o — State AID & ABETTING IN ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO RAPE vs Continued, Geore eee No. 22 orge L. Whitaker ; Set DRIVING DRUNK vs Continued. No. 2214 Wade Junior tt; State DESTROY PERSONAL PROPERTY — een vs Continued, Eugene Jones \y C-18 NO, 2280 State © DRIVING DRUNK vs Continued. “No. 221,7 Yohnny Louis oe sas WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTEWT 10 KEM = James Lee Brown ontinued. ae W-22 es flo, 228% State DRIVING DRUNK Ws Continued. $ " Eugene Sims, Moton FIR } i 1 t i ' { } ' } { t ( ; { i ) } i { ‘ ee ee ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ST WEEK ------MAY TERM, 1955 Wednesday, May 25, 1955 : ASSAULT WITH DE WEAPON wrt ASS J y DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT 70 Nol Pros with leave upon pa which the County is liable, °F £08t for BREAKING, EN BREAKING Continued, DRIVING DRUNK Continued, DRIVING DRUNK Continued. ASSAULT ON FEMALE: LARCENY the defendant required to zive a $200,00 3ond for his appearance at the n-xt term of this Criminal Court. POSSESSIN N-TAX PAID LIQUOR: POSSESSING 3 ] GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR FOR SALE: 3S PAID LIQUOR FOR SALE AND EB] WITH DEADLY WBAPON TO-WIT A PIST WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT The defen Nos. 2273, sontendere In No. 2273, of the Court ig tat defendant he confined in the common jail redell County for a term of SIGHTEEN ) MONTHS to be assigned to do labor on the ic roads of this State as provided by _ In Nos. 2274 & 2275, judgement of the Sourt 18 that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of 'WENTY-FOUR (2) MONTHS to be assigned to do labor on the public roads of this state as Provided by law. This sentence to commence after the expiration of the sentence in No. 2273, and is suspended for a period of. I (5) YEARS on the following conditions: (1) That within SIX (6) MONTHS from his release from prison in No. 2273, that he.pay the cost of all these actions. (2) That he remain of good behavior and not violate any of the laws of this State pr of the U. S. As, and particularly thai.) L€& not violate the liquor laws, and apace)! that he not possess, actually or constructite”" any sort of intoxicating liquor or beseen during said period of suspension. aa Phat he not operate any sort of 4 for public place where the public is lovin fither food or drink. of ee the event the defendant violates ~ a. 16 terms of this Judgment, Capias 7 vommi tment, to issue. , ent eacte NOSs 2276 and 2277, prayer for i vinued straight, No. 2302 State * sh Yerbert Alexander Gibson io, 2198 State ys george William Camphell This at 10:00 ot IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MAY TERM, 1955 Wednesday, May 25, 1955 BASTARDY Continued. ‘ ' ; } BASTARDY The defendant, throuch counse a plea of guilty of the misdemeano failing and refusing to support child, Garry Wayne Stev the body of the prosecuti Stevenson, in viola‘ ior North Carolina, 19-2, that the defendant be imprison: Y jail of Iredell County for a fr. STX and that he be assigned to perform labor said term under the directi & Public Works Commission The execution of this sentence the consent of the defendant period of FIVE (5) YEARS upor conditions: (1) That the defendant pay action at this term of the cour (2) That the defendant pay the Clerk of this Court the sun disbursed bv said Clerk to Virginia connection with the birth of Garr that he pay into the office of the Cl] Court for he support and maintenance of until the further order of this court herei: sum of 510.00 first payment made on Saturday, the 28th dav cf May, 1° the sum of $20.00 on Saturday, J $20.00 each two weeks thereaft further orders of the Court defendant desires to make to not make a payment on do. (3) That the defendant shall comply further orders of the Court hereinaf connection with the order to provide supp maintenance of said child. vapias and to issue at anv subsequent term of thi carry the sentence of imprisonment int in the defendant fails to comply wit! aforesaid conditions. ight to modify a enson nson, c ek +hea per week, ne (4) The Court retains the ri judgment in relation to the Support : of said child in the event of change of circumstances of the parties or of the circumstances of the child. The said Vireinia Stevenson is hereby enjoined to expend said sums so paid to her solely for the support and maintenance of her said child. (5) That the defendant execute a bond in of $300.00 for his personal appearance at any subsequent term of this court during said period of suspension to show that he has complied with the terms of this judgment. ] a4 + sonNnerea nd maintenanc +he sur eee a nee RE RS NA Rn A I A ES LO NL SE I ee EE A NS ee MI I ES SO ce OS SS : ; ; ; 95 Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, May 30, 19595 | screed citetige JUDGES PRESID NG Clock A. M, : ous SUPERIOR COURT is wick) ane . sa IN THs SUPERIOR © RT IN ing ous ERI OR \ COND (EEK oe ete PA TERM, fn , ae i\ Wigs SECOND WEEK ----- MAY sECON f K O55 h . ¢ Nonday, May 2g 4209 Monday, May 30, ) M Noe 5669 wORTH CAROLINA, reEDELL COUNTY. 4 {fu ¢ ? ' Thelma Ostwa+> ‘ ing heard befor 2 under- Defendants Tredell Superior sourt, upon ee SE a Clerk con n= report of the petitio: and + sca a - and the Court, tha recor’ os : : , and veiling m Attornevs of land, F cian ty seen report are unequal: upor commissioners said report SE ee So Sa 7 ~ ~ aliotted$ this ae : On Defendant S ans r ry} a ] V I ay i ° p ora . r } i Pe on $ or Cort o é ’ n B new appraisers ve - the pet ; a TeG.e nlvoredq 1. That the Plaintiffs have not dockets THE SUPERIOR COURT ) im oure Supreme ag same has expired. writ of certiorar! ah dae ; alowed in th use for the serving i : ‘ : : » Suorer or docketing the record and transcript in the -upre’ Carolina, mn to. nstrongs heard before His Honor Frank "+ Agim i} o ‘ Fe einen . he appeal "ee il teal a . eAATT ANT ECREED t , Une BP} Co mty upon x HEREF RI ORDERED , ADJ ID YED AND DE sits 1 . a unvys ‘ay term of the Superior Court of Iredell ¥ mhandoned and *. ‘ hneen 3 anaon nt he Supreme Court of North Carolina has been © QD intiFf P y [rn ° aH eons + plaintiff for leave to file an Amended Complaints judgment iS now ordered + i ‘ final 4 * rT oO : 1 he A ad ¢ he judgement entered at the November Term 1951 S hat the plaintiff may within fifteen (15) ; i ad if no appeal h the adiourn + - hit a ronment o his Term of Court file I Cause, and proceedings in this cause shall be as an jAmended Complaint, been taken the defendants, however, the right to move to strike anv portion Thi t thereof,to demurrer thereto aad ehiscsiv6) dav cua ‘Ris the 30th day of May, 1955. which to file Answer or Aneuats This 30th day of May, 1° “Onsented to: Ong : Land c M ‘ Armst (Ls if 200, Sower & ~ a ‘ Frank Nin a S_& Avery by Neil 5S. Sowers (continued on next page) mk mw me ae 4 3 5 . s a ioai hie ’ erpRRTOR CCJRT ny mrTy TID! r ATID. SUPERIOR MTP? M YS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ye MRT “TERM, 1955 ND WEEK ------ MAY TERM y at ) Wi May 32, 1955 Monday, May 30, 1955 wots oltshouser & | chell eons nae ene emerge taaneaiae mente ican entaentipanen Be } OR nana +tarnar f 4 0} x ° Ainge to Onyart convenes accorall ! Je Vou! - For the Plai ;fFS pe a CTeENne 1055 at 9:30 ofclock 7 Usah Sheriff oO} eee eAAR na Following gooa al coe week of +he av aed SY hoe | Bie Ge | "G7 x i Le a - a ins , noe heard hefore His Honor, . a * 32 yortor Court rosidinge or VOUT appear? ement of appear? aS have acreed to pay Tah oO f LW cord jecreed he taxed DY and +ha f axe Yartificates is' deceased. f Arm ong - nk Me Armstrom— J Q 7 +s ont of St atee ———aoe presidint r- D. Pope are men and women const to-wit: 055 Sea May then?’ Tuesday Morning, May 349 Reuben E. Troutman R, Hatcher oh N THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK ------ MAY TERN QO Tuesday, May 31, 1055 és. 5072 North Carolina I varol nt ‘. ; he Luperior Court 4 redel] Mav m N) erm 4 i ¢ 1955 Vernell lawfully married as alleced in the hona file resident of res nv of North months next yrecedins the hrineine of this ie Pendant lived separate and apart from each ceding the bringine of this action? Sra ein tens stenthsnsansasees orth Carolina a In the Superior Court - le en irede]] sOuUNntYy n Mav Term, 1955 iT ~ . ~ /ernel] rerory Smith Plaintiff Judement Jares Alexnader Smith Defendant "hn 4 on miS cause Comings ; . i frank me oe ; ¢ eine heard before His Honor, ‘T4" - Armstrone, Judge ury at the May Term, 1955, of the Superior Perio? en-- Court of Tr oe : © Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that def dant has hee ms n e 1 er a personally served with process, and the following issues having hHean eke om §) mitted to and answered hv the jury: 1. Were the Plaintj rr | and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer; "Yes n Ss. a Has the ° S tne plaintirer » Gavevicn ¢ een a bona fide resident of the state of Nort = ~sne Tor more the , ’ an six months next preceding the bringing of this actic anSwer: "Yes t he served by hei in IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- MAY TERM, Pik 1955 Tuesday, May 31, 1955 3. trom each other Answer: "Yes." Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudzed and decreed tha a. Yernell Gregory Smith, he and she is hereby rranted the defendant, James Alexander Smith, and the bonds existing between the plaintiff and defendant he and And it further appearing to the Court, and the co» that there is one minor child of said marriage, Linda has been living with her mother, the plaintiff, since th the court and the c MA parents: and it further appearing to fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person tc the best ine anvad control of said minor child, and that the her said A custodv of mother therefore ordered that the plaintiff complete custodv and control of court dav of for two years next preceding the brinzineg of this Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and ap: ‘pyre rratrtransc a ” fxam here . afc YO IN THE SUPERIOR cCouRT SECOND WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1055 Tuesday, May 31, 1055 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1955 and the defendant intermarrv as allered in ‘ fendant separate fror period of two vears or more as allezed in the Complaint? plaintiff been a resident cf the State of Nort! orth Carolina for more thar SIX months neyt nreradine . A 4 ‘ a E the filing of this Complaint? v answer es, N THE SUPERIOR COURT --» CnAnsan ® . laint+tiF¢ter "e heard and being heard at the May Term, 1955 irédeli Cauntés Ss : t — he “redeil County, hefore His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, a vury and the jurv havine answered all the issues submitted + 2 2 om + ; n the favor of the plaintiff and acainst the defendant, 4 fink] ° LY appears in the moO J s eet ~ “ie record: and it appearing to the Court that there was born of the riac he marriace of the plaintiff and the defendant one child, Jerry Johnson, age five vears Old, and that the plaintiff herein has the care and custody of said child: and it further appearing to the Court and the vourt finds as a fact that the Plaintiff is a fit and suitable person %0 have the crstody and control of the child, Jerry Johnson, and the the best interest of j Sdd child would Serve by bene in the custody of his father, he being found to be a fit Ail Person for the custody of said child. it 48, there nere a : : “res ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing betw -X1Sting “we en en the plaintiff and the defendant Des and the same J are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an Lvorce from the defendant decreed that the absolute qd It is further ordered, adjudged and Plaintire, William G ‘ Johnson, be and he is hereby awarded ~ full and Complete care e, Custody and ngons This cause, contra of the child, Jerry Jon in So far as for further oO it relates to the custody of the child, 18 This the rders, 31st day of May, the Complain: the plaintiff and have thev lived separate N THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK. ~ MAY TERM, 1955 " Tuesday, May 3, 1955 iNo. 5975 North Carolina Iredell County p, F. Brady 2 ISSUES Mary Nell Brady Were the Plaintiff and the Defendant married and wife, as allesed in the Complaint? Answer II Has the Plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County for a period of six months, immediately prior to the commencer action? Answer Yes. sa Has the plaintiff, D. F. Brady, lived separate from hi a defendant, for a period of two years prior to the commencen action? Answer Yes. th Carolina Iredell County, D. F. Brady Vs Mary Nell Brady m i his cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this the May Tern c pe ies p . ‘erm 1955 of Iredel County Superior Court, before his Honor Frank Armstrong. Jy) ee ‘ - iswered the s*rong, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having answere “SSues submitted to it bv the Court in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Def Defendant, as set out in te record: Nv a Q 2 Now therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the honds of Matr; intiff and the * “atrimony heretofore existing between the plaintif renee defendant, be and the same are hereby dissolved, and tne Plaintiff, D . F, : Brady is cranted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Mary Nell Brady, Frank M. Armstrong UDGE PRESIDING * MR SE EOS EK BOR RS amr 2 Eos 2 See == == = = a So Sina rire eR EE AE OI 5 ee Seeliieenee mame sea antenrak eoaiatironer ict point ~ Se eee Ppears in the IN THE SUPERIOR courT SCOND WEEK VOU vi i Wit, —— ee ee ee ee eee Tuesday, May 31 COURT TITRE. iss 1G defendant intermarry as from the plainti and have they lived wah tWO ves rs ,y~ re ae alleradad 7 +hz rs I I 3s @li 1 in e 4 4a of the State of North Carolina filing of this Complaint? beine heard at -he Mav Term, Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, Judge having answered all the issues submitted Favor a ee : so . le plaintiff and egainst the defendant, as fully record: +}. "ao & nereforea Ordere djud wed, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of v heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, Same are herohy q @ dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby sranted an divorce from the defendant 31st da rf + a he i VO WV / May 1955, Frank M. Armstrong ———" Judge Presiding * £8. 28 N THE SUPERIOR COURT i ECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1° ii Tuesday, May 31, 1955 Noe 598 North Caroiina iredell County. azel We Martin Vs aruel Re Martin Jal iff and the defendant marri in the Complaint‘ Answer Yes. TI TT Has the plaint on heen a resident of Iredell for a period of six months, immediately prior action? Answer Lit Has the plain ived separaté a period of two vears pric .o the commencement "his cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Ce - ; : 5 ws a ‘a s Of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Nerth Carolina, Y ,* nor Frank M, Acmstrong, Judze Presiding, and a jury and the answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plat and arainst the defendant, as set out in the record: Now therefore is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of “trimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, be and ‘he Same «x ‘ é " eo : anted are hereby dissolved and the Plaintiff, Hazel W. Martin, 18 gran absolute divorce and from the defendant Samuel R. Martin. FRank M, Armstrong Judge Presiding me wk ke kk mk me ok we ok ok me ee om N Jt r SECOND WEEK ---=----- MAY TERY. 1955 lesday, May 31, 1955 COURT Walttel Iss pre) and +) lafar ‘ and tne defendant intermarrvy a: separate from the have they lived od of two vears of North Carolina for Complaint? nendqdercon ' ei OC es heing heard at the May Term, 195) f wy His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, iury having answered all the issues avor of the plaintiff and arainst the defendant, record: and it appearing to the Court that there am § NaS YC rri ichae] David of +} ne plaintiff and the defendant one child, ate two vears old, and that the plaintiff in hae +ha was as 1 are and c + 3 C the Omri wet , 20ur and the Court and suitable David He 1 “enderson, and that, in the c Custody of said chila, Person to hay iStodyv of his c istody of said child: and it further appearing 4 indS as a fact that the plaintiff is 4 fit © the custody and control of the child, michael he best interest of said child would serve bY e "father, he being found to be a fit person for t 2zed in the Complain: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT emeONt WEE MAY TERM, OND Wiss a ¥31 1055 Tuesday, May31, 1955 oid 1 is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the hond av s sti between the plaintiff and the defendant neretofore existing betw Pp a es hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an are het . trom the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and d plaintiff, Thomas D. Henderson, be and he is hereby award eare, custody and control of the child, hie cause, in Sc far as ++ relates Te hte for further orders. This the 31st dav of May, 5SORR North Carolina 1 tiff been a bona fide resi “arolina for more than d Six months next precedi Answer: ITI fy Have +} : te : art ave the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apar Other for two ve ”" é : : £ « ' years next preceding the bringing of this action: Answer: Vac 2S e ‘orth ¢ : “arolina In the Superior Court Irede]} n bi YOuUNnty s on rc mv} May Term, 1955 ‘ ron Wise Burress ‘laintife ° vs 's Judgment J Tee Bureegs ®endant This ) 4 °ause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, Judge Presiding and a jury at the May Term, 1955, of the $y Perior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court saat defer, 1e8 dant has deen personally served with process, and the following tseue havi vi ORS been Submitted to and answered by the jury! ae ee ea IN THE SUPERIOR | . i 1 TUR SYPRROR cOuRT SECOND WEER ooo Wiegee IN THE SUPERDR COURT Tuesday, May 31, loss ' “T5 2 1955 SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1955 Tuesday, May 31, 1955 Were the Plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married a ri S alleged ;, vo, 5087 the Complaint? No orth Carolina Answer: "Yes." = h 7} Iredell County. Has the plaintiff heen a bona fide reside q a l riage resident of the 3 x tate of North Rohert J. Knox ‘or more than six months next preceding the brinzing of this acti : ee ee + 10n? "Ves," tho Y) ; + 34 f + fhe plaintiff and the defendant lived Separate and apart fro, , years next preceding the bringing of this action? Were the Plaintiff and the Defendant. married ’ 7 $ the Ccmplaint? ror : : nd wife, as allered in the Ccmplaint: adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff ; . intiff, ee Answer y granted an ahsolute divorce from the 1 caw sia oc aii de . Q ae oonas of matrimony heretofore existing resident of Iredell County, Nort! d they are hereby dissolved, aths, immediately prior to the commencement c -, and the court finding as a fact, ald marrige, Irma Jean Burzess, who has iff, since the separation of her parents: rt and the court finding as a fact that plaintiff live ong ate vee a person to have the custody and control r ' d separate and apar period of two years, prior to the wmmmencement interest of said child would he served a Vv ze sie n wer eS custody of her said mother: ANSwe! Se +h . "ee ; erertore ordered that . in “ he i hereby eranted Dliete eustody on i . 4 ai 1 control said mi intil the further CP OIKrt Frank M, Armstrong __ Presiding Ths a 5 ' “HiS cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this the May Term of of Irede1} cuperior Court of the Year of 1955, before his Honor Frank ¥ a" +? T r . : . : 4 7 Armstronc, Judge Presiding, and a jury and the jiurv having answeray + ‘ ed the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the Plaintire é ; “* €nd against the defendant, as set out in the record: Now therer aa nds of wererore, it is ordered and adjudged the the bonds ‘atrimon a Yn e _ ae 2 j j y heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, ' and the ° the same 2 : — ' are hereby dissolved and the plaintiff Robert J. Knox, is ranted bed an ab moe S)Solute divorce from the defendant, Georgis H. Knox. Frank M. Armstrong JUDGE PRESIDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY THI Tuesday, May 31, 1955 LAN & fio. 6009 SARDLINA PERTOR anne ERIOR COURT yorTH CAROLINA AT AY mp re MAY TERM 1955 NT IREDELL COUNT? ath Shoemaker Martin, " Plaintiff, vs immie Wayne Martin, Defendant, defendant intermarry, and are they now husbar; ra \ NUSOariG plaintiff and the defendant intermarry a Yes. ant separate and live separate and apar: ) id the defendant. separate from the plaintiff and have and have thev lived separate and apart from each other fr d apart for a period of two years or more as allezed rears ‘all ah aie nuouslv Answer Yes. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North resident of the : te of North six months next preceding the filine of this Complaint: the commencement ion! Answer Yes. nry vw Q U ny AT T TATA Wide CAROLINA Arm TORDRTT. CONTV COUR i 4 ‘EDELL CON cz uth Shoemaker Martin, Plaintiff, vS Nirem4 Way Ni + 2 1e@ Wayne Mar Lu Defendant, 1 +ho ° heard and being heard at this Term of the " ise comir n to be heard and being heard at Y ‘ » n - ‘. 2 1 = ouperd Cw by 7 rn * 2 rT + ! sounty, North Carolina, before His Honor Frank Perior Court of Iredell County before His Honor Frank } - : +#h rresiqi ¢ 7 +, and a jury, and the jury having answered te ding and a Jory, and the Jurv having answered all the issues : ‘ to. ie 4 + = ¢ ’ oi - ourt in favor of the plaintiff and against in the favor of the Plantiff and against the Defendant, as fully in the records, “pears in the record: T+ . ” . f “ is t ti ae + 1 me 4 ny ordered and adiudced by the Court that the bonds © » therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the honds of matrimony {aq + he} herefora matrimony heretof ‘ heratar ony heretofor oy el heret a, ; — ore existing between the plaintiff, Clorice R. Moore, and Crore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the sam ’ sri ff aver? the defendan: \ —T an Pan | Vv » Faul H. Moore, be and the same are dissolved, and the pla h . r 3 ‘ As ereby d Ssolved, and the Plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce iS granted < } : €d an absolute divorce f the Defendant, rom the defendant. Frank M. Armstroma— 'S the 31st dav of May, 1055, Judge Presiding Frank M. Armstrong Judge Presiding Reerk az dk me & SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERTOR couRT GE occas see SECOND WEEK --------- MAY TERM, 105 Te ke Tuesday, Miy 31 Yoss °°” cumini plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart nave vVisk 2 t nor for two vears next preceding the bringing of this action: ofner er eo " "Yes. Answer: a. aa oe . dindged and Now, therefore t is ordered, adjudged and AVN he and he is hereby tranted carta iefendant Rosé a Jv Cowan, and the bonds of qerenualiv, **™\ cnet Te defendant he i thev are sotween the plaint and defendan e and they a1 And it further ordered that the plaintiff pa: the Clerk. ro he taxed by This 31 dav of May, | AaT TTA CARCLINA , eTT Aarram IREDELL Ul INTY iohert Edward Barfield, m each other for Plaintiff: Barfield, T - “ Defendant. ‘ * ; 7 ro oe In the Superior Con Ff and defendant lawfull May Term, 1955 2. Has the plaintiff heenAd hona fide resident of the p r ; : : : ad arolina for six months next preceding the hringine of th S se a Os ,Owan . t ow > , De fendan? ANQuiD v PG ANOWSN§ Yes, J)» Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate be heard and beim heard before His Honor, ach other fF i vv muner Tor two vears next preceding the bringing of this actic 13 ‘ as nm 10 f n@, and a jvry at the Mav Term, 1955, 2% iMowon, vy ; ‘ ANOW Tt $ Yes QOUPerianr Carin i“ + . ‘ I © 10 G oF iredel] County and it appearine to the Court that defendant i naar nas heen nate 74. : : ° personally served with process, and the following issue h s 1 lavVvINe heen enhe? nN submitted to and * and answered hey thea Jurv?: 1 ; Ve Jere the r : ‘. ne plainti-rr and the defendant lawfully married as alleged ne complaj Piain Res ANSwer? "Yas. ~Oe ae Has the viae * Plaintiff h 5 , - ] een a bona fide resident of the State of ner? vVarolina for more +h or more than six m Six months next preceding the bringing of this action? a ; AnSwer; "Yes n THE SUPERIOR CouRT -------- MAY TRRM® JoOKs . , oil ) » May 31, 1955 IN TUR N THE Tle O18 Honor Fran) the Superior defendant lawfnlly married me state of North action? lived separate and apart from intvine of this action? G. Chamhlee, Attorney for the d decreed that the plaintiff Robert sranted an absolute divorce from the hat the honds of matrimony heretofore defendant he and they are hereby hat the vlaintiff pay costs of Armstrong. __— 7 residing this IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1°55 Tuesday, May 31, 1955 ev yorTH CAROLINA L COUNTY auth W. Jollv 4s lliam D. Jollv id the nlaintiff and defendant intermarrv Di nyghand and wife, as alleged in the complaint’? Answer Yes and defendant separate from each have they continue separate and apart fror than two years pri institution of this actbn, complaint? Answer Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident North Carolina for more than six months prior to the action, aS allered in the complaint? answer NORTUW faADNT : ; Wett KTH CAROLINA In the Superior Cour ToeneTT ante ica pt adee IREDELL COUNTY May Term, 1955 Ruth W. Jolly, Plaint ; fr , vs iam D. Jolly, Defendant. TL . ; . } + } “Nis cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at Super4 CaArssne , ’ * } e erhor Sourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, before 1 of armstrong. Jydeo P Sa4 t “ somestrong, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and thefury having issues snhmi+ ‘ . , Lanes f Submitted to it by the court in favor of the plaintiff the def ‘endant, as set out in the record: i +h Sonds of matr4 imony heretofore exsting between the plaintiff an be, and the » 4nd the same are hereby set aside and declared null and vo Court a ; ‘ : . » and plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the Frank M, Arms Judge Presid 18 therfore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the cour a+ Honor, Frank a n q o answered the “ ry inst and against t that the d defendant, id by the defendante strong ing IN THE SUPERIOR court WE &K A Q intermarry the plaintiff hwo vears or more Carolina for a somplaint: o sfore His Honor, Frank v, and the vor of the i in the rece rd¢ the ro fo YO y , } >» wy dered, ad. udged leretc f¢ . ° au re poy : I >X1S between th I) , le pla Same are herehy dicen} : . GQ SSoOlived, and the ds sy . 4lvorce from the } : I T e at — i endant . ma ee Ria nis 3lst dav ¢ Mav, 1955 f , /@e ACNIRT VVUiba a ing heard at the M. Armstrong, ‘ury having answered all the Issues plaintiff and against the defendant, : +mony and decreed that the bonds of matrim intiff and the defendant be, and the e plantiff is hereby granted an absolut Frank M. Armstong Judge besiding ee Me MK Me Nese tecesk te oe ok IN THE SUPERIOR COtl SECOND WEEK aR Tuesday, May 31, 1955 No. 6025 at CAROLINA | NOW ‘REDELL COUNTY 4 othe ‘ : : 2 sop Yelen Perry rarker, Plaintiff - vs -- tr t 1 " e Is + voodrow W. Parxer, Defendant 1, Did the defendant interrarry , 7 +h wplaint* hushand and Wiieé, ne COfr pia n : , Ya Answer: 2S a ° Did the iff and defendant 1 L h¢ rom each other, and have they lived separate 1. + hy for more than two vears continuously prior to Answers 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident ‘ ; : ‘ ra than Six montns prior to t encement IREDELL COUNTY alan rerry Pay! sy, 20h il rar ye ee ss oadrow W,. Parker raer., Defendant cause mming on to he heard and nT Iredell County North Carolina, udge Presiding, anda j and the “sues submitted to it by the Court in the def tendant, as set out in the records: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds hatrinon: ae iia a ‘ony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Helen Perry Parker, and the defen ‘al oi ‘< 5 . fendant, Woodrow W, Parker, be and the same are dissolved, and the a Palntiff 4 ‘S granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. And ; m , ’ p nd it appearing to the Court that one child, Sarah Lynn Parker, now if vears ‘ H * ae e of age, was born of the marriage union between the plaintiff and the defendant and ; 1 intiff ‘» @nd the the said chil is now and has been ever since the piat and defe i@nd + : “pY Separated on cr about the 15th day of July, 1952, in the ®*xX¢lug4 ing ve care, custody and control of the plaintiff, and the defendant having [pPeared ; 5 i din this action by and thragh his attorney, W. R. Battley, and it ANnNNvYeE “Ing + appearin C = q a a } +heE es IN THE SUPERIOR court SECOND WEEK ---------- MAY ERM i 1055 fuesday, May 31, 1955 n + - er ¢ sourt from the statements of ec e r pi ff 1e ant f cansel f Plaintj intiff ang sourt finding as a fact that the Plaintiff ¢- ; wnt SR TT. ani the care, custody d cont 3 y and control of Sarah Lynn Parker er, sidered, ordered, adjudged and decreed by and with is ee With tho that the int f - hat ie plain r be, and she hereby ite oo: UY IS, Bivey wrny hee yl — ‘ . Lynn rarker, and the defendant is herehy . . 47a. UU YV authorized and tohave said child visit hin at it him, ially the child, and interfere wit} ; Fa 5 3+ vad sy } . s further ordered OY and with + Ao t + he defendant pav to plaintiff each and maintenance the sum of anc payable hereafter, until said She married, whichever p ' fs wet Ba an Lien £ sTLE ordaey ¢ na IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM. 1¢5 Tuesday, May 31, 195 No, 6028 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY. Be TLLIAM Te HOWARD, JR $ I l a a a a et ee ee and defendan secuti being heard bef > Presiding and a jury at the May vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Aafas A 4clien ant + - . $ q ant has been properly served with process in accordance and the follo 7 wing issues having been submitted to and answerec 4 ae Nere the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged Complaint? Answer: "Yas " LES e a. N ¥ i Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina . Tr more than six (4) i i i shis schAen? ; months next preceding the institution oO 1 " Angwer; "Yas. “Oe on Have “rom the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart each ‘he Other fop more than t ng the institution wo (2) consecutive years next precedi of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: + er: 'Yes.", THE SUPERIOR COUT {THE SUPERTOR couRT i THE SUPERIOR COURT Tuesday, Nay 32, 1955. ECOND WEEE. -“>—--— =~ MAY : , 1955 Tuesday, May 31, 195! NOW THEREFORE, on moti f H BREFO} ; otio f pH on of Hudson & Hudson, Attornevs ¢ Se order 2 4 s j a aoe the Plaints re . 7 a is ordered, adjudge n i t ™ | , judged and decreed that the plaintiff be and h een ed ) nN ; - I) e is he reby Wilson Morrison Plaintiff rranted an ahsolute di n absolut livorce fro ree from the defendant, and that the } i » the donds of Annie Lewis matrimony heretofore existing }t nner xisting between the plainti y intiff and the d . ne defenda : hair Ajtaec nt and aQiss olved, aid VS. thomas A. Morrison <A SN Defendant #) th yr ed + he c ts f th h f\) er r dere yb + + ~ . be 4 shi / »S ‘oO oO j é j I ¢ a ¢ Ne Mis action @ ¢ This cause coming on to .. ‘ n eg we T , 7 f Superior Leury. ror Iredell Coun ss Me. Armstrone ne ~ Presiding se peep pe table te Shik bt tae Ea \ 4 } a pe ae * -he undersigned Judge t residing and a iury frallawine 7 1e Sn ; 7} wing -ssues as naicated and aS appear Vit we) plaintiff and the defendant t Answer? Yes. erior T 4 . - og 3 VS bh Dia and he aé . - = Ac taly yran 5 lv preceding the commencemen defend rn + 1 aeriendant Atear rrv a theretore “d j ip I i fi 4 ma ry as ’ . ‘ ¢ € , Cr z a; ad }uds ed a ratrimony heret enw a ks : eretofore existing hetween the plai they are herehy ee . y, dissolved and that theflainti defendan 8 3 s sranted an bs nt ¢ a4 jiefeniant lived separate and apart absolute divorce from the defendant ie Snel e commencement of this action? of the State of North Carolina for No. § I L et O Williams & Clyde commencement of this “yrtle Williams & Hushand B Ivah Nish ; lisbet Lewis VS Nosco M Lewis sont inued. Thelma Ostwalt VS Sam H Ostwalt Qs West Construction Co, Inc. } V Dir a 7 e KR H Gi ee Board of Education of Iredell Coe et Works Commibctek C Co VS N. C. State Hichway & Public yam H 1S . . a VS cat chaone & wife Ruby Ostwalt, Katie O Newmar Mrs Lilite Ostwalt & wife Levy F Ostwalt, et CB Waueh va ¢ Combs VS Marshall Combs Dart mde vs fake Rhyne Stout Artell Hie White VS Trois W White Biiguhetn 4 VS Pearl Hickey ------- Sama “rt ee VS Hugh J Campbell <-+«+---<-<-<""r~ Mattie Le r Kennerly VS Mamie Burrell Kennerlyv <------"" Ray A Poesy vate VS Paul M Church --++------------4""-" Claudia & c S Edd Ray Stroud & Mrs Robert Ivey ----"--~ lvde three udaker T/A Fairview Grocery VS Maynard 1 vabaeen Ten Cil Co of Statesville, Inc. ---~-~ son VS Boss Reid, Gurt Reid et al ---"*"" Continued. Cont ; nied ‘ al-Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. encore a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- MAY TERM. Tuesday, May 31, 1955 IN THR ee IN THE SUPERIOR couRr inor Rosa Harp, Plaintiff 4 and defendant married to each other a * 5 ie : ’ ar a bona fide resident of the State of Noth Carolin ® G immediately preceding the bringing of this action? lefendant immediately c be heard, and being heard before his & irv, at the May Term, 1955, of Iredell 9 sues were submitted to and found by the Jurvs ) and defendant married to each other as alleged resident of the State of North for six month siatee ee ae ‘ng of this action, «Ss alleged omplaint‘ Answer, "Yes." 2 Uy : Je nave the plaint ton h other ; and defendant lived separate and apart from eae or two vears next 4 q this Cc j 7 vompBint, as alleweg in the Complaint? | 4 U > Vom 1IIGs Answer: "Yes n N THE SUPERIOR COURT e menor 1¢ ORCOND WEEK died MAY Leutraes vol 7 Tuesday, May 31, 1955 POE OEOD ER M ; f Tr ie Pierce IT 13, THEREFORE, on Motion o lressie rierce , ORDERED, CONSIDERED and ADJUDGED, that tl the plaintiff and defendant, t laintiff is hereby er tad sissolved, and that whe piaint f is here Hentead ED, that the plaintiff y THIS CAUSE comir on to he heard hefore iry, at the May term of and the plaintiff havine introduced his ev def fendants having thereupon moved for ich r, nonsuited and the defendants recover This Ho , se : aan Ya O65 S Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, June i, 199, at Os 330 O'clock A ae vi e le me ert a ~~ Ft ae ANae PRESIDING / IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN TRE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1955 OND WERK --------- MAY TERM. 105: Wednesday, June 1, 1955 - “Wednesday, gune. Le1955 INO.» NORTH CAROLINA TINT VY IREDELL COUN? jandia Be Shumaker ve a v r/\ Fairview wrrocery VSe eet See See ee Sel See? Rhyne and Quality Ci] \lvde Rt , a of Statesville, x170 % e heard hefore sompany ned Judge and hei s~ @Nd Deine This cause coming on to be heard at the e plaintiff 2nters a motion to he snarior Court of Iredell County before RY h . va and it appearing to the he referred for the reason that the trial amendment to her origi case requires the examination of a long account shall be allowed thirtv davs from the plaintiff. in which tc file said pleading \ ° rm oF NIC) . Mie COURT'S Own MOTI 4 aw 4 we Lia w WwW the defendant's counsel shall be allowed oth of fact and of law in the above entitlec ichto file answer tc same or to otherwise referred, hy compulserv reference, » Baxter itatesville, North Carolina, who will hear the plaintiff and the defendants and report his Frank M. Armstrong DGE PRESIDING of law to this Court in the manner provided hy law. ORDERED that the Hundred and no/i00 (! leposit with tha J lerhk of the Court ( n Nal ° Vollars, said deposits to be made with the than Jone 15 10c¢e June Song and said deposits to he D + : pav he costs of this reference, This lst day f Sherrill] d 1a 0 ‘ irch. Arr st Yon? <M ee ee ee jw LY | : , Frank Le ae sna e ; sea Aes ia SAl NG endants Judagre rresia ne £ ‘ Honorable To + 1+ toni heard and heing heard before the Honor LO the entry of the ahove order hv the Court and he sien A & Armstron Judge “ 238 " m tne rede}. sai } : i ; . 2 4 Jac Bs dee | esidine, and a ury, at the May Term of th d Order the plaintiff and each of the defendants object Court, ¢ . eh , ‘ : e the : Thie Ff: » and at the close of the plaintiff's evidenc ALS rst dav of June, 1955. defendants hay; ; ‘ ~ Having moved for ‘udement as in the case of nonsuit and the Frank M. Armstrons court ; a esiding court havine eranted said motic Judge Presid ‘ i Sé q no ; n? x mp eb tts eae ants are 2% MEPBARING to the Court frais eke pleadings filed by the defen? he in + rein that a countere] ying sal aim was set out in the defendants Answer pra the sum of 4 ; to sult OF Py and the defendants having greed judeor ent seed Cc - r.$U+" . counterclaim aforesaid in as much as the Cours ne NOW THEREFOR R counter’ it is ordered, adjudeed, and decreed that the of the def atainst the A endants nonsuit”® Plaintiff be, and the same is hereby, and dismissed, m This the 1 dav of J, ine, Frank M. Arm2= * om eek ke vdge Fresi@ius, BK wwnnnn= MAY TE N THE SUPERIOR COURT Dur 7 - . , rASP moor. as NK ------- MAY TERM 1955 sinus WEY ------- wy oe Cee es 6 dav, June 1, 1055 Siacasae June 1.1955 JN f 7) £ No. ‘ Io 5645 ‘ ’ “ . . a art arolina In th ee : N “Vi sal A Y mn tne per MARTH vt , >uperior Court, iORTH CAROLINA 7 e ideas Troanol)) ‘ounty h Naw Tear JOce ATIRITS : ney vey m, 1955, | IREDELL COUNTY o y Qo in arhert at Sq statesville Motor Coach Vompany, ! laintiff 4 377 North Carolina, ' ’ Statesville, : op ) Plainti ‘ S. | oS ee ‘ a wa 4 JUDGME fendant. } La Bailev and Beatrice hh. } Railev, y 7 re ie ain Pr ae : a , f 4 t ‘ lain f an efendant intermarry, and are they now hushan Defendants, i oe 'US0and as allered in the complaint? This cause coming on to he heard, and being heard, t ‘ore his onor “ ‘ T > $ 4 c a | a) - T y . i tat. . + op Answer: eS. x Prank M. Armstrong, Judme Presiding at the May ] erm of ] : ount = es Ps 4 ad 4 ee ; Bide ~ ms Aefeandants motic he Ate, seh ae oe f ; d the defendant commit adultrv, as allered in the complaint? ' superior Court and a jurv, and upon the defendan ( or 2 C10! ( wee ws Fa a tho plaintiffs evidence For indement as of nons' ite: S 4 4a thoreafe re in: . 7 1e | ! 5 - eee : ar ran ; re Sus dis j that tr Sntiffs actior and the sa: is . a air ff heen a bonifide resident of the State of. North ordered, aiudged and decreed that plain S actic an ame 1s ty mG) 0] 1 far a haw « wien et ha a ee ee z e ice akhem -4s eeee . herehv non-suited and dismissed " a x months immediately prior to th: stitution of this : : i a ction. as allesed in the complaint’ F The defendants and each of them anncunced in open court that thev Ti << Vee desire to take a volurnarv nonsuit as to their cross action azainst th« ay . Ye t ninines Ff Dial! S. ‘ RE Re os * ; es } At3idgeed and decreed +t} Pet sarc } na, ( In the Superior ‘ourt + | 1s, h e: or . ord: red, cons dered, ad Ia Ze ana , . per 7OuUrt, y 7 c \ . n - defendants he ard thev are herehyv allowed to take a voluntarv non: it . ay Term, 1955. eRtre eee tae : ; ‘ ‘ e as to their cross action. . 2 lair er A ” . 7 s . : £ g + } * -+avoa it is further ordered that the costs of this action is to be taxe . A ‘ronenuren® 5 ana Pe a . fan S ) m ~ 1 efendan This the 1st dav of June, 1955. 4 e f , his Rea siti Ae aie sis , : oe ‘ ‘ ° + Frank f Armst PE i ik auieade S caus C r on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the ee rec dinne super ic ( af Trade ‘ 4 , — Prank ‘ ‘a Ry + : 2 - Iga Han yran ue m s ‘ is — ntv, North Carolina, before His honor, 0 the forecoing inudement the plaintiff in open court gives notice ¢ irmstronz i. Pabbthiee aio Se : he issues ’ anda : ew nda the v rine n wered tne 3 c DD 7 . : 3 m : FF 4c e a ry, and tl jury having answer appeal to the °vpreme Court. Further notice waived. The plaint 5 ritto ‘ i. Racca vn i * - defen- > ourt 3 fs * g + Smt Giff and rai t the i , al] AKA A ‘ ‘ i to n Avor oO he plain ; and agains llowed O days in which to make up its case on appeal and the de endants lant, as set out in the ” YaAarnnA ¥ | | ecora? ellowed 30 davs thereafter to s°rve countercase or file exceptions. Appeal 4 is therefore ordered A 44a 4 hy the Court that the lenin i ‘ . ) | , eee eens eet eae aeen din the sum of 3100.00 adjudged sufficient. ends of matrimronv h +aAlan : ’ : : : ea p eretofo) existine hetween the plaintiff and the ~ A ps e jafand } 7a fe me Tndse presiding sa ¢ ant., €, and the Same are hoerehyv dissolved and set aside hy the Court, a | ana the niaswiwest & s oe ee ee ae ae ae ee ee ee SS piarnti*f is eranted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Frank M. Armstroné Judge presiding ti we se ¥. ¥ te st ae we ste de we de ye > icapable of IN THE SUPERIOR SECOND WEEK Wednesdav, June N THe onprr IN THE SUPERIOR coypr ISSUES jent mental capacity to intel] ‘mently plead to 7 : properlv conduct his defense with safety to is. COURT heard and being heard hefore the undersizne’ 5S Tarm of the Onperinar ourt of pP Iredell Court finding 4 ; ' + Y 29 A appearing to the Court, and th risoner, Sugene Jones, is charged with having committed Ne? nerennal nranartyw hye hAuyvrnine " winlation ee Oe pe , A I \ pe Y ola OT 0 Ue Ve n the prisonerwas hroucht into Court on said charge it lonrt that the prisoner was mentally incapable of pleadim +rant ar ae undertaking his defense, 200earines to the Jourt and the Court #, rhter finding as é ° ° ‘i 7 « npon tho a jnrv duly chosen, sworn and empanelled to pass upon . t! Has the defendant sufficient mental capacity t ill of Indictment and to properly conduct his the jury answered s rights and liherty?": and that LK Bugeré reby establishing as an ultimate fact that the said *l8 pleading to the bill of indictment and of ; ; ion 0! irther that hv reason of said hearing and determinat ital es tate Hosp! oner, Eugene Jones, should be removed to the Stat , a _ i ‘ 9-83 0! arolina, pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 ar met YADYT \ NORT! \ROLINA TT " y TIRIT S | iil 4 N97) £4 4 No. 2: State a | S 1 serene von ~~) 1 ec tha 2fend 1 + V6 Y 4 oe “te he nt n Int e = clin he iat an 7 art wv answer O« _ 1 4 “HOTT AATYAT® y° f Ce ‘ + 4 a } “AY e } i } hie pnane ror aAsne \7Q at T . : 4 nf . C AY I — ant +hat +} me o at ~ + wy * cr : 1 ] ae P an + + at th W e crreste rn +h, to ft a hKI17 - ne rn rthoayn facts tnat thee pon eke ee oe > , ntell)igant? ile, nla q I 1 piea aAatf > tera + ense with safety sont ; Said issue "No": the nae “ar a” nes mental 1‘ r nant al-+ s 146rtaking his defense: Tt appearir ~ f*. 4 rR - Aad aia } : sa lssue, the pris 5+ 4 1 NY at Olds} oro, orth the General Statutes 1©] Wc 2% and amendments thereof: 'N THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 1 June 1, 1955 Oo ? soo ‘ Ta ‘ a ie et ‘ NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby ordered bv the Court: That the defendant, Eugene Jones, be and he oe ; ; 1 hat the Were Oe. ee ee ee i S con ted tc core : fn nT ’ . ; ‘i pete aL a a a d . aeate Hospital at Goldsboro, North Carolina, pursuant to the aforesaid the otate ! F 4d amendments thereof, and the Board of Directors Pog wt statute and amenamen ie ’ | Cc S ° } $4 e he hy Atireartea to receive sai, See dem as torches * said hospital are here directed to receive said & ‘Hkh ck a j id Hosnital and treat care for and maintain said Ene Pee patient in said x : . =i pithy £ @211Q Maintain Salada & ene Jones therein pursuant to said statute and amendments thereof, 2, That the Sheriff of Iredeli County is heret sted to convey ym he Yones to the said Hospital at Soldsborc orth Care ee ; said jrene ones C I o Q oS 4 J LOGE ‘ } a > him to said Hospital pursuant to this imment. T rar pt a As ide ¢ fanaa he <a my 3% hat a anscript o he evidence before ; 31 : hearing and determination of the aforesaid iss made andao forwarded to the Superintendent of said State Hospital at Goldsboro, varolina, and costs and incident to the making of said anscrir pa Vv the Board of Commissioners of Iredell County, North Carol This 1 dav of June, 1955. Prar be T) 1c yac q y 0, 5036 ORTH CAROLINA ‘ : SUPER TIC . LHoUELL COUNTY * . Lowery Plaintiff ) 'S . 7s ; } ‘ U ; 4 fn ; rady R vas 5 “! Pe MULLIS and j c vy S M,, . Cat oue } llis T nn Defendants This Cause comin + h «te : as Hie Hanne se coming on to be heard, and being heard betore s Honor, frank M. Armst »« armstrong, at the May 1955 Term of the Iredell County Superior . 'e y+ ly " 3 in . » and defendants have tues . ee : *¥ appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and adjusted 1 . ° . } ee te dQ all matters in controversy existing between them and that the derendaanvs are to pay to + Nie os eT eile ne) Pay to the plaintiff the sum of Seven Hundred and Eighty-eight ($788.00) Dol} : Vilars in 17 ie : i : 1] settlement of this action: 4 . “Sy therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that aoe “nd recover of the plaintiff have Richty-eight (3788.00) the defendants the sum of Seven Hundred and ilars together + YO with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. Ths This 31 day of May, 1955. Frank M. Armstrong 8 Judge Residing Lang land, gapeowers_& Avery ®fen a A ers de dants & very, Attorneys for the wk Rk kk ok kk Rk HOw OK OK itis ris fy B ac i ik i # Lt ' . eee ee oa | ortn varol la, oe an | 4 i JX i e Tat T) abe r af . . i - . . * lair La a cg a “a nat an ( a n < . La ¢ wt an 5 - T ( yHtwy ner , 4 FPF Schools f Trea) ) ] ] ja rt i oi F nF } Sr ss ) ( T ] ff tA ba . con® ‘ ane s Pils rar e Armstrc : + . Dy rc o a 1 a ry 2 ~ : pa OT +> + o * C ps ; rC i ( yr Cc 4 € C cr : a Indian ; . e Wa ‘ , a mar part a jar 1at S l ons , SS 2CY S ( Y Ya ny “ ile . ( S ar 3 ee i js i mo oad 3 4 i Y a4 a S rthe ? Ril as - - A twer avs aftar amended c@plaint or IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ~-------- MAY TERM Wednesday, June 1, 1955 No. 5918 a in th ; NORTH CAROLINA, e Sunerin ; } % n the superior Court I RIOR CON ee we Sk sUUILL eo May T 106 . CONT may term, 1955, IREDELL COUNTY ee \ esr vaynard L. Johnson, . i ) ORDER OF REFERENCE. 1S. i 2 et ie GO: 2 BER Ross Reid, Curt Reid, Et al. e Me \ This cause coming on to be neard at the May 1955 Term of Iredell nrandan+ ) A A 7} Wathiahs 4 n } £ +ha und rr ened lnidce rocidineg and 5 ~~ . sO , ¥ Supe i0r Court oeriore tne indadersignea vuage +o Ast > @ appeariyr naan } et LG >« he Court that this action should be referred or -t reascr at to the UOUr n stlie A 1 O8llsiVUUlsu cS 1¢ f U I A ng on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the requires the examination of a long account between the plain f and dell County, North Carolina,upon a motion of the | Me . r >. 2 } 7 J A f defendants, Boss Reid and Curt Reid, on a building cc "ac ( > RPoard of County Commissioners of Iredell County, construction of a house, and between the other defendan ar action, and motion heing heard is Honor, Sc : : sub-eontractors, laborers and material-men, involvine liens and prior : r residing, and the Court being of the opinion : . p ] It is now ordered that a1 of the issues both of fact ar ay th wr cam re nt Or a 9 wr («4 . a A : . ; Or simers redell County and each of tem should 1 4 } 14 c ar a7, action be, and they are hereby referred to William KR. Fope, 4sq., a S action: Aan tical ni’, Vase fF M ~ NI b ont 2 “haan +} 2a * £ + attorney at law of Mooresville, N. C who will hear e < ( re, ordered and atiudeed by the Court that the Boar scot oad : : tee we ‘ ; plaintiff and defendants, and report his findings of fact and concl or a = ‘A es Ae ; redell County, North Carolina, said Board being ee ; : , ‘ i . iaw to this court in the manner provided by law not later than October l, a WR ie oo af > VT . ( yharman, and Jd Ve. Ervin, Vance Wagner and Kaa . i : . We 2 . > ‘ 1955, Tt is further ordered that the plaintiff advance 1 a -osts an nd said Board and each member thereof are hereby Ja fah Amick IAD A ; ; a a ee jefendants 5100.00 costs on account to defray the expenses of er Ss to this action. It is further ordered by the Court + ieee ad reporter. i by the Clerk of this Court against said Board of eh i ns inisS tne 31st dav cf May 055. > ember thereof and that thev be served with said 1 rmstrenz Frank M. Armstr ‘s avian cu cmitee ; e +a tae etitior Judge Presiding. opy of this order and copy of the complaint OF peti’ carved the Court that the plainti on said Board and each member thereof. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT " SECOND WEEK ------ MAY TERM, 1° Wednesday, June 1 ‘ 1955 ve xk ove ~*~ (OK >< It a we kel ie die ff shall have ee ci “attie Lee Boers > e adjournment of this Court in which to file am Paani eae i pe ON e ran) M. Church, Frank M. Armstrong Presiding te Judge Presiding This cause comine on to be heard at this term of ; we . a rk 2 ee eS Se Senate | “pon a motion by the defendant for a continuance $77 Atal ine t : : a °S of his counsel, Mrs. Sallie Jackson, the Court - i! the , b ] . > . term, but on the specific condition, which the hotfie : ; d of, that if his counsel is not able to try the Civil te d rm of this court, it will be necessary for him and the e ° 88e will not be continued again on account of def ®*Tendant ts counsel, Frank M. + ee RRR RR Re RR ROK OR dudge Presiding. Iredell Superior on account of the continues the case ia defendant is hereby case at the next to employ other counsel, the illness of Armstrong IREDELL Ye + trad ra ( 21 Zz ° . 4 od nav ar HOE Si)n rank "4+ a\ I e je 4 aq ILE Infor i 1a “ IN THE SUPERIOR court AWA, KT ie SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM. 10655 Wednesday, June 1, 1955 CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AATT AIM YW 0 V a Oo Plaintiff ) . a ~~ is and Scotty Oricinal Defendants ) ~— [ry and Huth ) is cause coming on to be heard, and being heard hefore His HOnor erm of the Iredell County Superior and it appearinz to the Court that the plaintiff and defendants have all matters in controversv existing between ther and that the nts, Grady BR. Mullis and Scotty Sue Mullis, are to pay to the +} lie a m1. ee bine . on a “ . ~ e i rn | he sum <¢ hree Thousand Two Hundred And Twenty-two ($3,222,00) n full settlement of this action: + . _ ae were ron $43 > ¢ ae oe j iff S, therefore, ordered, adiudged and decreed that the plaintiff ” 3 Tr) NEF 2 . > ‘ is] cover of the defendants, Grady B. Mullis and Scotty Sue Mullis of Three Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty-two (%3,222.00) Dollars ei togetner with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. nis 31 dayof May, 1955. Frank M. Armstrong Judge Presiding vy Cor nis a ‘i. s 7, Lewis Attorne fOr thea Laint ££ | Land, oowers & Avery ++ Amnec ~ a A orneyv or +h t aA + * 2S) A Jefendan 8 i rad a. 3 LI S ana Icotty IVE ] lis. PHant @. trary pa 6 ; warpente « weohd, Sy J. G. Lewis, Attorney. Attornevs for t Defenr | t s r the Defendants, H. T. Lowerv and xuth Lowery i 1 % xkKkK kee & £2 RE ES KS co 2 or mL. 2 tr : e ’ Hl , he ~ et 5 A i Nils nonorahle Court takes recess until Thursday Moning, Jun ) at 9:30 o'clock A. M, __ bam PREo.DI ee JUDGE Superior Court This canse coming on to be heard upon the Motion o Co ; ‘ : Bt le a cs i | pomlan aaas mPlaint and it is therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that 195), N THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND. WEER ~oc-oc- MAY TERM. Thursday, June 2, 1955 Rand No. 5743 North Carolina, In the Superior Youpt . Iredell County. ~ 14 Yernon Lee Saunaers ’ Retty Hall Saunders } This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell] iilas } before the undersigned Judge, and it appearinz to the that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and proseci etion or it would be non-suited, and it appearine that the plaint failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this acti s + + : : “i - ; . “a * 2:7 . ane isa 8 the same is hereby dismissed, and the plair : aX — Jibs ~ . Fran} « Arms Pe et td Se Ty - . ee i ea a; WU Lov ivas > ie s Ne we 5! we Care %ADN T CAROLI 4 IN + por sd s 4 A >T T , os IREDELL COU} rece Pierce, { Plaint rr iS. OR wv Se Gladden ; Defendant | ~ f Plaintiff, thre » Scott, Collier and Nash, to amend his Complair “© and include in Paragraph VII the following allegation: nm 3 ) 4 wh 4 That te has lost wages and has incurred dector and medical 11S. the Court, in its discretion, permits the Plaintiff to amend his the s Comp ; ; di s ‘ Pp Y Plaint be amended as moved in order to add to and include in Paragraph the ot 4 allesation requested, to wit,: " . . 2 That he has lost wages and has incurred doctor and medical bills." Frank M,. Armstrong Presiding Judge ri a NORTH C AROL ] NA “1 ’ ceoneT Ty nfireey IREDELL COUNTY oe O, Pierce, Plain riain we Se na. . e iaaagen, Defer laint wae } (*¢ y+ aracraph VII the followine allegation: NThat as lost wages and 3 ineurr ioctor and medi : a is lost wazes and has incurred doctor and medica] bills," pectfully submitted, this the lst day of June, 1955, SCOTT® COLLIER & NASH Attornevs for Plaintiff Vv R. A. Collier \ : P PRE TRIAI FEARING, ladder . 4 * / r cause coming on for a pre-trial hearing at the May 1955 Term of rior C of Iredeil County, the plantiff being represented by » VOll ash, and the defendant by Adams, Dearman Winberry, the he plea rs this appears to he an action by the plaintiff fendant t cover damages for personal injury and damages “ CS2 07 mc ] in a co} } isior hetween plainti fLIsS vehicle heing opera re ao wet r 1 ction on Grover Street in the City of onelvyy er = + |,22 on nis he 12 10 th truck of defendant : ‘eae veptember 13, 1954, and the motor truck 01 + ‘ ° ° o : 2 € 4 n the same rection on said street, alleged to have been the 3 ‘ : if or netlivence on defendant's part, in that he, (a), was guilty ° kles nz in violation of G. S. 20-140: (b), failed to keep® if a IN THE SUPERIOR court SECOND WEEK --=---- MAY TERM, 1955 Thursday, June 2, 1955' IN THE su! IO 3 i IO —<— rough his Counsel, Scott, his Complaint he amended in order Collier and ERIOR COURT 4 NT to add to and include (c), failed to vield the right o movement could he made in safety, 1@ passing and overtaking statute? (d), : f f wavy in violation 0! failed to in violation of G. » Nash, respectfyl)y IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COND WEEK -<------- MAY TERM, 1955 SE Binh Thursday, June 2, 1955 TaANlra ; smligence charted, pleads contributory neeli Defendant denies the negligenc largea, pieadas contr ry 1 ae lene +e nY a ” ce Se Rl os f + nti Tt and also sets } 1 cross Ac I10Fr or dan ares tc on the part 0! she plai : , * tn + 1 intiff wes Yc ligey iy rnNné h (3 nie truck, allegin= °F both that plain was negli ’ ns Meet a is was guilty of reckless driving in vblation of G. S. 20-140: (b), violate the speed statute, A. S. 20-141, sub-sections A and C, and (c), violated 1 §, 20-150 C hv attempting to pass in an intersection: (d), violated G 5s. ss @. Se failing to vield the right of way to the defendant who was makine 4 ‘ : : . i fatiaa \ teary me mnie a mnt ‘ 1eft turn in an intersection: (e), and failed to keep a reasonable look out o> his motor vehicle under proper It is iudiciallvy stipulated by all the parties to this action: m \ 7 $ 4 nYrran jan rac lant a7 J3iaty 4 y + ] hat the collision occurred in a ( ; pany he c shelby, . . ” r) Bae , ena I ti hs he eae 2. That Dr. E. Re Caldwell of Davis Hospital is a phys ina and entitled to testify in this action as an expert. Subtect to further consideration, the Court settles the issues a fa} rae OLLOWS > eo Ve [ erce ) D : 2h Plain : ) Se ) oe aoe 4 Qe . } / 5 \ e Me lladden, ) Fan . \ De endant e } 1 laf + ® : . e : . } : sy ty lnmaer io Was the plaintiff iniured in his person and his pr t lama . mS ? a4 . i , ‘ i rthe nerlivence of the defendant. as allesed in the complaint 1e defen . as ] sd it Shriit ao + 2. If so, did the plaintiff by his own neglizence contr e t< n4 "ries and damaves, as alleged in the answer‘ AnSwer: Ye 3+ What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff ent Yann, Over ff + , ror the defendant - (a) Personal injuries? (b) FP . . ) rropertyv damage? A 4, W. ” ‘ an © sq hy “as the motor truck of the defendant, T. M. Gladden, damaged 5} the neo? ig widens ence of the plaintiff, as alleged in the answer’ Answer: iii ee ele ‘ 5 What amount of damaves, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover Of + he plaintire; Answer: ‘rained siahinins is’ mee ieee . wo mus QnPerTAR entre IN THE VuUT ERIOR COR? T ‘ THS 2 } mit WL 4vuu L ™ ua ~ ara ey marys . -ECOND WEE Paar i a AAN ee MAY oP N SECOND WEEK ------- May TaRy 10 SECOND Was MAY nM, 4 ee 255 ~ Thursday, June 2, 1055 Thursday, June 2, 1955 if | soe pug Li 4 : pe No. 501), : IN THE SUPERIOR coypr : _ ttle : { Le verth Carolina : | i North va In The Superior Ait | t ‘ \ as uw i vb . \ jredell VO} nty lY | | , 7F ~ Rs a a i a wae ae hy ; ;. } ‘ voun GS a TT; : thel L. Smitn ams = Pies 4 a mith § ; her next friend ora 9 ; 1 i Jer ) . / vs icc ed i < (eee | heinge } ~he w 1688 4 vee cause being hi at the May 1955 Term of the Superior Cour ad z 4 “i YWUUT ‘ . > é 4 | “| : lvde A. Ramsev, minor, thal os ek ae - ‘iyde Be Se RCM : varolina, before His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong an and William 9. “eel, [ih > uc a ardian ad Liten } Wie J i } a a r first and issues as fol] eae ’ me ; ve aS 0 Ows: f a ph * 3 Lf os ‘ Se fl - be Se a ae if re WS? “ Was the plaintiff heen a resident o the State « arth re na for i a than efx months next preceding the institution of this acticn’ Ad * ° ” + . fer re Pannant arrioad ac allagad in the enmnlaint laint and defendar may ed as al] ¢ F c } as SO, i the plaint i oe Wer his own neclicence contribute he hd « ; eee nower? Vas answer. as ar ITA TES ae 9 aerad rm #+hoa newar l a. a i \ I i.w W 3 jas the plaintiff wnder the are of eichteen vears of ate at the time af the purported marria re x + > Db . . Was the consent of the parent of the plainti ziven to said purpe << ee ee strong this cause comine on to be heard over the t Tiers the Jurv. resident of the State of North carolina for S next preceding the institution of this action: ° era the ny} Int : 3 comN int: Plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complain ANSwers . Nas the ’ cn i > Plaintiff under the ace of eichteen years of age at the time 0} the Purported ; <“O Marriage? ANSways "a @ Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR cov SECOND WEEK ------ MAY T Thursday, June 2, mn" 4 + it Au “4 parent of h plaintiff river Y © said Purporte; said ord ered . ine hetween tha vlainti-e and and said marriaze is herehv declared y)} act : on ha + axed i } 7? qiu 4 ibioW li Viivite the Plaintire E EFORE THE U } CNED JUDGE 16 Sac Wich Silage ans ee heard ons rratyranse 4 i custody of their the 20th, or at the next draw add*tional Af withdrawn and mistrial the plaintiff to amend her 20 davs from the adtovrnment of this se 4nSurance Company fork r tn) der with:, : ; . davs thereafter, te answer, demur 0 Y n which to file its own ML This 3 dav of June « Armstror vs Urens howls ad journedssine#die. ay Nt ONY i x IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT SECOND WEEK ------ MAY TER) Thursday, June 2, 1055. y 72 V\Oe 58 ot ATA ORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUN? * the said issues as £ 4 orth, ee 88 8 oe #e oF ordered. adi a . aM lecreed that nz between > plaintiff j ang na ce sa QY Sao ’ } and said marriace is e vy declared nu)] aintite ily this action he taxed « ns* the pl remreemeynee . Cc h « a stodyv of their ust 2Cth, or at the next mav draw additional ig withdrawn mist ; ew rk be fo is hereby rance Cor to amend her 30 davs from the adiournmenrt of this davs thereafter, to answer, demur oF 8 order within whick This 3 day of Frank M. Armstrong mar PRESIDING 7 DGE rHROLUI I hie U LS nonorabhle eer + a ° : /Our’ 18 adiournedssineédie. Tt JUDGE PRES _—_ tA _saepIorn 2 " “ . ae a - eae ¥ = sit oe te a ES Se Defendant / 3 + c % 4 c .: 7 os » oe “ \ Cc C ~ C pe 7 UY its oF O oC Nn C c t nN c se ; >. &@ @ @ ae a eee , . & s carr > S aoa : . - oS 7 t z , 3) — Cc = As $4 + of + & & c ; 4 - , . ae, wt 4 . : ~~ = ~ + + oa ¢ ) 4 . a : P . ee 4 = + s ¢ ee: i . ; >| O ot ep r $ - + ¢ rad ¢ © wo & ; : C : © q ¢ c . > a4 a ms r ' od a ¢ £ $ C z _- el @® 9 ¢ wo : ; © s & by du. C . ' a q oO rm x = > Qu x S OS 4 f " a C . she Y ; z) Ss cS ° ; Bh F r 4 r > aan o— © r @ . v + wo ¢ y = 5 2 1 ot o r q | = + + oie . ha Ou S r @ = c . : } 4 nt. = : S Oo ; & & = , e 7 UC - ° @ i o = © 4 oS oO on o x= + : es oe 3 e 2 «2 oo G oy Te foe A fe sa & eH 2 £8 2t ee . v c i. e S bey a 1 t = eS . @ se eee . = ec 5 : - . ‘ . = : Cc - 2 a CO a Q - a G 2 : S - wv : ret ; t : i OG es os oS S c o . 5, 6 ® a > a 5 * ¢ : wv &. q + oO a ., G & 5 c ; 4 os + oO G 7 “as : ‘ o s a ee ee c o : io > 2S = = = = e + o 3 : : ) — os : m=) d 3 x 2 © bs w . Oo 5 oa c pe & a SS u ‘ x : ¢ = - i ~~ - = 3 c 3 h © ‘a : h UO < 4G sill ae x & ., CO rt S i oO G ° Or + o SG ® : es a o © e . ® ct eri - ee 80 0 08 8 08 88 of eas a e ““ = ,o) - G wr wal ‘i - ” Co be GC © + Oo : S oO O co : : c o ‘3 Oo Oo ® o & OG Be - oO Gs > ® a © 2 z | x TG ¢ ‘. on 0 oO “4 G C C , > : oS —= © O . @® o Dp t, os © ~ < . Oo = = ‘ @ e 4 - -& o x E * +“ + a & x = > 1S TS , ~ r o 3 = t ; > = , 3 , &. = ° . = + s + £ q@ eo -& ao & oe ee a ees j G- x , co . | * *r 2 . q o ph: ee os > $ : o 5 5 © es % 86 S oC ° a : . = a e ° - 7 ”~ % G » c ger u ° © oo @ > * ak 2 & 23 q . 7 pee t @ © ed cc e e _ > 3 w Oo s > ” £ — KS 5 C . f , CW + C2. > a ¢ b. ° “ \ me ¢ ¢ at r G oes c . ° = © fe] ro C . © o o * © on @ C : a = tis - at < SS 2 os s oO c * P 4 % 5 x x : @ S 2 o & ~ sm a mS . ‘ UO w : c ei = . ; .- ao Ss wee l * Q ee S. ge ae $. 4 : ) oS oe os @ ae n 9 © = © + q o E = - = 2 5 ca “+4 a wn = : tb 4 = a oT £ TO 4 Oo E : P — s sj & no _ Hs cocoa s A el < 7 : c 4 a c> : - °r ~ a a. = E - oO « : = . = * . - a je ie & 4 = Ss a = i ano © @ oO o oS - q = - + at oc a ao = o Pah * 2 e ee o> os ole S 2 = = A oO oie a © - = o e w a oS S @je oO} > ola ie : t c = d : Eg eres £ ) me ge @F e £3 7. 2 - eet hae 2? 2 ee eee ie @ > a : Patel @ 5 = . s oud aa 5 a he ee aie sa oe aS a. @. 3. 2 ees = og n o Ae we JZ a > wo ES not a“ o ie oe it , 4 a f < =r: Jer | O aloe oa . * + & @ Pe) @ c Pot = ‘| ” + ri - @ ‘ e or © Aa =x ala = Ss = 6 ‘. 3 SS ci t @ ona pul ~~? - E n ol—4 c14> el @ as | a & + Q. + ae ae + oO a ort © oOo on Cc ae cs oi ol sho : ° s ¢ = = é : Ai Pa & eo 2 a : a os m Po 2 € : § = = 3 =. E . a. | dings sd = < < = ‘ c } i As s ‘oS ar Z = as £ 2 co @ . <> = o a + ks ka t nd As S ~ & f. a @ co 5 2 o aaa 3 Fos 9 5 & > a eS . Se tig ge gee a 3 f=] cee = @ as a = +2 = we @ = Se eae Ss .. i Q, Oo G o < oS. Ss co Se a. 5 4 et OQ. “ o & - 5 : a oe S a 4 > a. eae S33 2 te F 2 uw ra ae mt @ = ~ 4 ~ * : pe in ee = © ow > p. 7 OM fo} sé 3 > ie _ ° cy & <=. ¢ c. = ae oS o > — O ® . = et wn @ = oo rs) @ ‘ oC ~ > rt rd ei £ ; ee s a 42> o c S ~ or > a re ao} a a ee Oo Me a 4 : % $ 4 ae ™ : “ xj fr] 2) se s. oc q i 4 Q - : - a : L a) i, oe Ae ¢ : . . f 5 nea ; et © oy > at us S ¢ c E : a a os ‘ ay hp al C fr C é é oe g : Co E ie 38 b ee 4 € . - + $, = 3 £ ( c . gz i ai $ £ % © £ sz ; : ° > . 4 q ; rs ot . + a c x ; © $. q . . ¢ 4 c * C = SI sz Oo . o * + : - ° C / CAROLINA “es IN THE SUP CONn@ North Carolina [In the Superior Court Iredell County ~ rea + 50 y r or Q r OY ) . QQ 1 fe % ) " yener Manufacturing COMPON ¢ : oe pUrns Pisintitt, } lair ) ) | ) ‘ J GME rrr, " oe - - = ° ) v ) AIG IN I \ } . a ‘ j h 4 ) . ghinn, Jr., T/A Shinn 4 . se ° ny f lay Mat Company, se aa se ‘ otor ere Defendant, | ‘ y y Y + } ee | Y rs) i) = ’ ~ . + } - Am 4 rl ¥ ‘a , ~ { ry wr . ’ ’ ( e heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith. 0) Tia cause coming on to be heard before the tonorahble C. G. oi ‘ nith, Cler This caus somd ; ( } sy Ky ‘y +4 sd " at . mies ; er nae ' 2 ™ ry : - t ’ y i ae eae ee ee ii pe Gy ¢ J i L County, upon motion bv the plaintiff for “rerk of Superior ‘ourt of Iredell County, N. C., pon mot he plait: % a { - —Prinet +) } ss de nn ee gs 7 3 ; . ieee oP + tan we : 17) ¢ f 1a? lefault inal: fon tydement arairnst the defendant by defaul nal: and, apt rine to the Court that a veri ti ed con pla int was filed and It appearir e to the court hat a verified complaint was ! | 1 } mrmMoyY 1 } -_ + $a ants y he "+ lh, -y os 4 5 i : . ae - 3 +h O+h dav of nrtamt £ + ons 3 al or 0! he 27th day of November, 195k, eymmong issued in this action on the h da peptel ; ° on s -*? r ” annoar?s + -~ hh ne 4 a . kan ‘ i Vt ‘Lari ft * Tw le] % We ty ndanr j ti sppearing to the court that said summons, together with said summons was returned | the Sheri C edell Vy l, Opy of sid complaint were served on the defendant on the “th day of "The defendant, after due search and dilimence, not tc Biecdcinciinaadilect he an gi JC r 5] ‘ountyt i 4 i pounty’~? and, appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or other It appearing that on December 6, 1954,.tnhiS c m a roariaYynea Vy uy é - , ( i pecading nas oceen fiied by the defendant and no extension of time to file for serving said summons and that the same w t aa As a ad and tha he time within which pleadings may he Iredell County endorsed "The defendant, after au 4 : Nas -Xp "eas to he Found in Lredel] 7Ount yite and, appearing to the Court from the verified complaint tha it appearitr hat on February 2h, 1 , tcnis cou! ‘ action consists of the hreach of an express contract to pay th within which said summons could be served, and that on February «<), ’ Contract i namely ’ tl L¥ «6 oe és . eta gata uc : s ee : eee We igi sonia the sum of Three Hundred s&ignty $a1a summons ogether with a copy of the mid complair 1S { s ea | 7 : . : tha Ans ; ; . . te \ , ) Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six e Getendant, ©. T. Shinn, Jr.s¢ and It further appearing to the court that ro answer Va +h co . 9 n] : eA W, neretrore + . leading £ 2ef S ordered, adjudzed, and decreed that the plaints! _ nm mM . « } a ee ’ eh ee eee ~f +imn t¢ S been filed bv the defendant, and no extensio! S2 have and recover of the lefendant the sum of Three Hundred Eighty-six and “’ pleadings has heen "ranted, and that the time within which pleadings may /100 ($386.88) Dol lars, with interest thereon at the rae of six per cent “led has expired: an l, Per annum, and the costs of this ac: fon. It further appearing to the court from the verified com lair 27 day of May, 1955. cause of action herein consists of the breach of an expressed contract to pa CC. G. Smith ae 6r s00ds sold and deli vered by the plaintiff to the defendant ana . - Clerk of Superior Court re i a S now due and owing by the defendant to the pla intiff - said goods S$ $0) i ; . i al 9/10 “d and delivered, the sum of Qne Thousand One Hundred seventy iWo 4 id 40/1 ($119 0) ‘ : n7@oh0) Dollars, with interest on One Thousand Sixty igh 3 <= + _ b—2 ~ ‘ Qn . ~~ 40/100 im an Dollars fro or ‘ LI } an Wry ’ mvune 19, 1954, and interest on One Hundred rour anne ; { \ $10) six (6% 10h 640) Dollars, from July 28, 1954, until paid, at the rate of six (67) per ce “€nt per annum, N intiff Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plainti V Nave wei ’ ‘ nan and recover of the defendant, C. T. Shinn, dr., ~/A Shinn Motor Company, the ‘ ny ‘um.of One Thousand One Hundred Seventy Two and 4000 ($1,172.40) Dollars, Loget, ! : } her with interest on $1,068.00 form June 19, 1954, and interest on ’ 104.40 from July 2a, of 6 % per annum and the Cost of 1954, until paid at the rate this action, T his the 13th day of June, 1955. C. Ge Smith = oe Rk te kk ke Ke Clerk Superior Cour for remove the matter he together . ¢ e heard hefore the nndersi ened lerk 0 appearing to the Court that the Pla! te i . ity S cuase to re: ove the case to Cabarrus Count, vit IP Senne ¥ ; ‘ : nesses, and he promotion of justice? t 2 » -, rans srred + wt , ORDE] ay BD, Oo Cal arrus ym s¢ Yih ADJUDGED AND DECREE THAT the matter be rogethe’ oe t euperior Court and that all the papers» certified COpy of the o111 of costs, be sent with this Orders dav of June 1056 , 7 re * e 3 ith Cierk of super’ Iredell County CAROLINA, n OU my UVUWL Le Rlectric Corporation, pu Plaintiff, mith. Clerk 4 a appearing tc ; e far Attorneys [01 t A + endan ra ————. Plainti j/ , ‘ ; ; iA MILLS BLE tree As Collier o Attorneys se for the Defendant yy 44 t oe RIC x ‘LIY wa Ta S ver , £ ow a ol, an Gi nrras 44iUlL VU ++ move as ES Be ant a , + & — q + ® £ S * LY fx] + © s no @ S Mm © q w & + | @® et & oO q S. a. a . + $4 a irty the , vu ne A ot + + EH co n oS — *r < — Es es t ® 4> & om . cg * Ss ~™~ o on = =< ® a) s 4 C hon tre ij all an ated syrin the inated and hor n 1 f ci ‘ 4 O r . - + 4 OU € ry m ca C rot E < b. » C 4 ace yy ac? 1 anntY qa con “oresai wo nm aq wo a “Antrant om 77 | C f cies = . wo + $ wo 4 4 ‘ oO r 2 * 4 c C M C “ $ MILO e U mea WAYUY wh isen or y A a oS n+ fenda We cuaranty of a h ise e gm of r of the Defendant th e recov ring from the statement —— h 1 goreec that this juden hat it has heen a d 0 per month commencing on the han fr) LU eV thereafter unti- of each calendar month the de fendant indged and decreea that +3 sndemenc in installments of §a1d : ewes 1955 and on r annecant UOlLOC.. by Laura Ma ke ik AUGUST, owned _____Ralpn Lionel Holmes _ Defendat 46061 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Washington Manufacturing Company, a Tennessee Corporat ion, Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT 3. H. Nabors, trading and doing business as B, H, Nabors, Store, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the under Signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this llth day of July, 1955, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, for judgment be default final, and it appearing to the Court: raved. adjudged now ordered, adjud vitae of the defendant the sum ° That on June 7, 1955, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in th with interest thereon fron ® above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, until rate of six per cent per annul dnfibe That summons was issued from thig Court on June 7, 1955, to the Sherriff of Treg el) County, and was returnable as provided by law. ote Aco? OLINA That summons was served on the defendant by Bunch Redmond, Deputy Sheri¢y WORTH CAR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT of Iredell County, on June 8, 1955, by leaving with the defendant a COPY of th IREDELL COUNTY e i on, trading and doing summons, together with a copy of the complaint. viian Le AStatesville SD rateorine -L- 4 toeny Plaintiff, juDG T That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended , and the VS. JUDGMENT. i ‘ am, trading as "Southern time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, Re aoering Co.", Defendant demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant, -5- , THIS CAUSE COMING ON TO BE HEARD before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in ; Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon motion by | ‘ ; i of by default final; money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final . . to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized + seneer ing j this action on the 7th day of May, 1955; verified statement, marked "Exhibit A", was attached to, and made a part of the summons “iseued tn tn : t further appearing to the Court that service was not obtained upon complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the mY. T . the defendant within the time required after the issuance of the said summons, purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and ; ; : and that, upon proper motion, an alias summons was issued in this action on the credits arising out of the transaction. ‘ilies and day of June, 1955; And it further appearing to the Court that said summons together with a That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized + ps copy of said verified complaint was served on the defendant on the Lth day of verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A®™, that the June, 1955, in forsyth County, North Carolina, the county of his residence; defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the 4 ; And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or other merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement marked "Exhibit A", the sum of 5 | : ‘ pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file Eleven Hundred Fifty-Six Dollars and Forty-Four Cents ($1156.44), together with : pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 12th day of has expired: October, 1951, until paid. : ; And it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint of the IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the PP s plaintiff that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract plaintiff recover of the defendant B. H. Nabors, trading and doing business M ‘Oo pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Six Hundred as B. H. Nabors Store, the sum of Eleven Hundred Fifty-Six Dollars and Forty-Poit y , Seventeen Dollars and Three C yuilding supplies and C ents ($617.03), for millwork, building supp Cents ($1156.44), together with interest thereon at the rate ¢ six per cent Pi ($ 3 naverials sold the defendant by t intiff, all as set forth in said verified annum from October 12, 1954, until paid, together with costs of this action taxed endant by the plain ’ complaint, with ; November, 1954, until paid; by the Court. interest thereon from the 26th day of Nov ° ’ ) NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff This the llth day of July, 1955. have and recover of the defendant the sum of Six Hundred Seventeen Dollars and C. Ge Smith ounty Clerk of Superior Court of Irede Three Cents ($617.03), with interest thereon from the 26th day of November, 1954, kk RR KK OR ee RK ke RR RR until paid, and the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 11 day of July, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court e*ekheR KEK Ke RR KR KK RK KK ni el a i an ie } f ij ‘i i ; ~#1,803 North Carolina In the Superior Court Tredell County Southern Spindle and Flyer Company - Plaintiff VSe Dottie Lou Mills, Inc., Statesville Associates, Inc., and Nathan H. Platt Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the undersigned Cler; of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, upon the motion of Raymer & Raymer, Attorneys for the defendants of the above entitled action; and, It appearing to the court that the plaintiff filed its complaint and caused the summons to be issued in this action on December 16, 1949: that said summons was not served on either of the defendants personally or by publication: and that since the date of the original issue of summons herein, no alias or pluries summons has been issued and that there has therefore been discontinuance of said action. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff's action be and the same is hereby dismissed. And, the plaintiff is taxed with the cost. This the 19th day of November, 195l. C. G. Smith in Clerk Superior court, Iredell (o,l.‘. * ex keeeeketetkeekeebheekeete & & ke & “#6037 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Bunch Funeral HOme, Inc. Plaintiff vs. JUDGMENT Joel Brawley and wife, Dorothy C. Brawley Defendants THIS CAUSE, coming on the be heard and being heard before the undersign a i the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing ‘° ime Court that both defendants have been properly served by Summons within the ¢ ding within the allowed by law, and that neither have filed ananswer or other plea and that time allowed by law, and that the action is on a note for a sum certain, the plaintiff is entitled to a Judgment for Default Final; It is, ff have therefore ordered, adjudged,’ and decreed that the plainti of and recover of the defendant the sum of $650.50, with interest at dient ‘ id °# per annum from April 28, 1955, on the principal sum of $500.00 until pe” and for the cost of this action. This the 22 day of July, 1955, C. G. Smith erk of superior eR KK RK RR RR Re KR OR OK OR ; thereon fro 4607 (ogi CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Lumber Company, a partnership an of Eugene Baker and Foy P. Brittain, Plaintiff, VS. JUDGMENT t. L. Walsh and Fannie E. Walsh, ee ee Defendants, This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendants by default final; and, It appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 15th day of June, 1955; and, It further appearing to the Court that said summons together with a copy | of said complaint was served on each of the defendants on the 20th day of June, 1955; and, It further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer or other pleading | tas been filed by the defendants and no extension of time to file pleadings has veen granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; and, It further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consits of the failure of the defendants to pay a certain promissory note | ‘tom the defendants to the plaintiff inthe principal sum of Four Hundred 400.00) | “ollars dated November 9, 1954, due ninety (90) days thereafter and bearing six (6) “r cent per annum from date until paid and that although demand has been made by } Me plaintife to the defendants for payment thereof, no payment has been made F thereon: Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have ‘nd recover of the defendants the sum of Four Hundred ($400.00) Dollars with interest m November 9, 1954 until- paid and the costs of this action. This the 22nd day of July, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court KR RK Kk OR ek ek OR KK KR Ke RK K #5960 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNT City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff VS Mrs. E. F. Wrenn, widow of the late David Turner, Claude Turner and wife, Mrs. Claude Turner, Clyde Turner and wife, Mrs. Clyde Turner, Willie Turner and wife, Mrs. Willie Turner, Cloyer Turner and wife, Mrs. Cloyer Turner, Dennis Turner and wife, Mrs. Dennis Turner, Mrs. Ray Lael and husbad, Ray Lael, Mrs. James Collins and husband, James Collins, Mrs. H. T. Hamby and hushand, H. T. Hamby, Mrs. Everette Miller and husband, Everette Miller, Mrs. Dwight Saine and husband, Dwight Saine, Mrs. Ollie McGalliard, widow of the late Junious Pinkney Turner, Edgar E. Turner and wife, Mrs. Edgar E. Turner, Mrs. H. R. Smith and husband, H. R. Smith, David Turner and wife, Mrs. David Turner, Mrs. Robert A. Eckard and husband, Robert A. Eckard, Mrs. H. L. Hallman and husband, H. L. Hallman, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, Defendant } THIS PROCEEDING coming on to be heard upon the report of R. A. Hedrick, Commissioner, and it appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that on the 18th day of May, 1955, said Commissioner reported to the Court 4 Sale at public auction after advertisement as required by law to P. S. West, Trustee for West Realty Agency, of the lands described in the petition filed herein at the price of $220.90; that said report has remained on file for ten (10) days and no advance bid has been made and no objections offered to said sale; that on the 30th day of May, 1955, said Commissioner filed a supplementa'y report recommending that said sale be confirmed; and it appearing to the Court from said reports and from proof offered that said price is fair and adequate and that it is for the best interest of all concerned that said sale be confirmed; Cc Nh ne i$ IT IS NOW ordered, adjudged, and decreed that said sale be and the sam h hereby e and he in all respects approved and confirmed and that said Commission ? i . 00d is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the purchaser 4 § er ices and sufficient deed for Said land upon the receipt by him of said purchase P is and that the funds so received by him be paid as hereinbefore ordered in ’ cause and a judgment entered herein, This the 3] day of May, 1955, “Clerk of the vuper 45960 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY city of Statesville,a municipal corporation, Plaintiff VS ri _ F. Wrenn, Widow of the tas os Turner, Chade Turner and wife, Mrs. Clude Irner, Clyde Turner and wife, Mrs. Clyde turner, Willie +urner and wife, vrs, Willie Turner, Cloyer Turner and wife, Mrs. Cloyer Turner, Dennis Turner and wife, Mrs. dennis Turner,, Mrs. Ray Lael and husband, Ray Lael, Mrs. James collins and husband, James Collins, Mrs. H. T. Hamby and husband, H. T. Hamby, Mrs. Everette Miller and husband, Bverette Miller, Mrs. Dwight Saine and husband, Dwight Saine, Mrs, Ollie McGalliard, widow of the late Junious Pinkney Turner, idgar E. Turner and wife, Mrs. Edgar E, Turner, Mrs. H. Re. Smith and husband, H. R. Smith, David Turner and wife, Mrs. David Turner, irs, Robert A. Eckard and husband, Robert A. Eckard, Mrs. H. L. Hallman and husband, H. L. Hallman, and all other persons claiming anv interest in the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell County, } ‘orth Carolina, Defendants | THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, i this 16th day of April, 1955. At said hearing it appeared to the Court that: I A Duly verified Complaint was filed by the plaintiff in the office of ee “we Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on the 3rd day of February, 1955, II Summons as to all the defendants was issued by the Clerk of the Superior Court, of Iredell County on the 3rd day of February, 1955. III ™" ‘he defendant , Iredell County, accepted service of summons within the time r “quired by law, to wit, on the 3rd day of February, 1955; that the defend pray: "EBs, He L, Nelinen ead husband, H. L. Hallman, were personally Served i ‘ nthe manner and within the time as provided by law, to wit, on ene Sth day of February, 19553 aude Turner : that the defendants, Claude Turner and wife, Mrs. were personally served in the manner and within the time as by law pro vi ded, to wits Claude Turner on the llth day of February, 1955, and M a Claude Turner on HR the 12th day of February, 1955; that the defendants, . Smi th and wife, Mrs. H. R. Smith, were personally served with summons in the time as by law provided, to wit, on the 7th day of Spe ORE i ae Px elit dea iat ahaa dan ampisunians eee: _- ny ) ay « Pan i . February, 1955; that the defendants, Mrs. Ollie McGalliard, David Turner and wife, Mrs. David Turner, were personally served with Summons on the 8th da y of February, 1955; that the defendants, James Collins and wife, Mrs, James Collins, were personally served with summons in the manner and within the +: vite allowed b to wit, on the 6th day of February, 1955: that the defendans. 4 Mrs. Hay Lael and husband, Ray Lael, Mrs. H, T, Hamby and m husband, H. T. Hamby, and Mrs. Dwight Saine and husband, Dwi cht Saine, Were all personally served with summons in the manner and within the time as by lay provided, to wit, on the 9th day of February, 1955; that the defendants, Mrs, Everette Miller and husband, Everette Miller, and Mrs. Robert A. Eckard and husband, Robert A. Eckard, were personally served with sumrons in the manner and within the time as by law provided, to wit, on the 10th day of February, 1955; and that the defendants, Clyde Turner and wife, Mrs. Clyde Turner, Turner and wife, Mrs. Willie Turner, Cloyer Turner and wife, Mrs. Turner and wife, Mrs. Dennis Turner, and all other interest in the lands described in the Complaint, have in the manner and within the time required by law, IV That the time prescribed by law durine which the defendants might appear and plead tc the plaintiff's Complaint has expired, and the defendants and all of them, except Iredell County, have not appeared or pleaded in any mamer tc plaintiff's Complaint, and the time prescribed by iaw during which any pers an interest in the subject matter of this action that might appear and her, or their claim has expired, and no such person has appeared © ; nee r defended any such claim, except Iredell County, one of the defendants V That the defendant Iredell County filed its answer to the plaintiff's Complaint admitting all the allegations set out in the plaintiff's Complaint * setting up in its said answer a clam for taxes due to Iredell County, agains! the property described in the Complaint in the total sum of $27.72, sail Ans having been filed on the 15th day of April, 1955. VI ’ : - day ° This action was not commenced prior to six months after the 1ith day September, 1939, m + he The Court at said hearing upon the verified Complaint filed. by t : ¢inds plaintiff and the verified Answer filed by the defendant, Iredell sith the following facts; (q) A Tax sale certificate for 1938 City of Statesville taxes listed ame of Ellis Leander Turner against real estate hereinafter descrihed in the nam lly, was issued to the plaintiff on the llth day of September, 1939, by the fully » : \ lector of the City of Statesville after said tax collector had advertised tax col . : state and had sold said real estate for said taxes at the time and in said real @ the manner provided by law, plaintiff being the highest bidder for said real estate at said sale, said taxes were duly and regularly assessed and levied. (p) Plaintiff is the holder of said tax sale certificate and there jue and unpaid thereon the sum of $4.95, with penalty on said sum at the rate (4 per annum from and after the llth day of September, 1939 until paid. (c) That the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff for subsequent taxes levied by she plaintiff against the defendants’ property and said taxed, interest and penalties, advertising and costs less the 1938 taxes total (d) That the defendants, except Iredell County, each of them are indebted to the plaintiff for taxes from 1938 through 1954 in the sum of $47.87 which taxes were duly and regularly assessed and ievied against the property hereinafter described. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed: (1) That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, except Iredell vounty, the sum of $47.87 for taxes, including interests, penalties, and costs, for the years 1938 through 1954 inclusive; and that the defendants, except Iredell County, pay the costs of this action, including a reasonable fee for plaintiff's attorney, the same to be hereafter fixed by the Court; that all said sums, penalties, costs, and fees constitute a first lien upon certain real esate described as follows: BEGINNING at a stake, said stake being N. 27° 99 min. W. 329.8"; thence N. 61° 15 min. E. 71.8'3 thence N. 50° 50 min. W. 22.1" from the northern intersection of Stockton and Harrill Streets and running thence N. 4/ 10 mins E. 128.0' to a stake; thence N. 42° 18 min. W. 48.5" to a stake; thence S, 47° 15 min. We. 135.0" to a stake; thence S. 50° 50 min. E. 49.0° to the BEGINNING, For page reference see Deed Book L2, page 199, Deed Book 97, page 321, ae Book 122, page 460, and Deed Book 217, page 599, Iredell County egistry, (2) That the defendant Iredell County have and recover of the defendants, &xce t ‘ 4 st Pt Irede11 County, the full am of $27.72 for taxes, including interests, enalt Penalties, and costs, for the years 1938 through 1954 inclusive; and that the Sai 1 defendants pay the costs of this action as aforesaid, including a fee of $3.0 ° for the attorney for the defendant Iredell County; that all said sums, intere ests, Penalties, costs, and fees constitute a first lien upon the real Stat ate described above, (3) That this Judgment be declared a first lien upon the real estate hereinabove described, and superior to any title, interest, Claim, or Lien th: any of the defendants have, have had, or may have in or to said Property, e Iredell County as aforesaid. . (4) That R. A. Hedrick oe and he is hereby appointed a Commisdoner of this Court to forthwith sell the above-described real estate, and the saiq R. A. Hedrick, as Commissioner is hereby directed to sell Said real estate » public auction for cash to the last and highest bidder, after notice of said sale shall have been published atthe Courthouse door of Iredell County for g period of 30 davs and shall have been published in the Statesville Record and Landmark once a week for four consecutive weeks, and he shall require of and from the last and highest bidder at such sale a cash deposit in the amount of 10% of the total bid, and after the confirmation of said sale by the Court, the said R. A. Hedrick, Commisstar, shall upon payment of the purchase price, execute a deed conveying to the purchaser the real estate hereinabove described, in fee Simple, and the said R. A. Hedrick, Commissioner, shall apply the proceeds of said sale as follows: (a) He shall first pay the costs of this action, including a reasonable fee for plaintiff's attorney to be hereafter fixed by the Court, and including: fee for the defendants attorney in the sum of $3.00, and including commissions allowed him, and the costs of advertising and selling the aforesaid property. (b) He shall next pay the amounts due the plaintiff, City of Satesville, and the defadant, Iredel County, the amounts awarded in this Judgment by wy 0! taxes, penalties and interests therefor pro rata; then shall he next pay the judgment for special benefit assessments awarded to the plaintiff, together with interests and costs; then shall he pay pro rata taxes, penalties, interests, nd costs of taxing units which were parties to said action but which filed no answers to this action; and any balance then remaining shall be paid in accordance with the directions of this Court and particularly to the person persons entitled to receive said balance, or any part thereof, which shall be paid into the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. (c) The Commissioner shall make a full report to the Court within three days following said sale giving the full particulars thereof. (d) The Commissioner shall give a full and final report to the five days after delivery of the deed to the purchasenShowing delivery ll : nied receipt of the purchase price, and the disbursements of the proceeds, anger" by receipts evidencing all such disbursements. : This the 16 day of April, 1955. C, G, Smith Clerk of the Super e r ourt mow ue ke ke kk ee ke ke ok me eK OK OF 4927-7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE CIVIL NO. 288 UNITED sTATES OF AMERICA Ve CONSENT JUDGMENT DAVID G. FRAZIER Route No. 4 Statesville, North Carolina “ee wee we Oe ——— This cause, coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Inited States District Judge, and it appearing to the Court, and by agreement of both parties, the Court finds the facts to be as follows: 1, That complaint was duly filed by the plaintiff against the defendant on November 1, 1954, and that personal service of summons and complaint was held on defendant; 2, That defendant has filed no answer or other pleading, and that the time for filing answer has expired; 3. That defendant is indebted to the plaintiff inthe sum of $1700.00, plus interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from January 13, 1950, until paids L. That defendant is willing and has agreed to pay $10.00 per month beginning March 1, 1955, payment to be applied first to costs, then toward interest, then toward principal until the judgement is paid in full; d. That plaintiff has agreed that so long as defendant makes regular nonthly payments as hereinbefore set out, judgment will not be docketed in the office of the Clerk of Sup@ior Courtfor Iredell County; 6. That defendant will be taxed with the costs of this action; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff, the United States of America, have and recover of the defendant, David G, Frazier, the sum of $170.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from January 13, 1950, until paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. ¢. That this judgment be docketed in the Office of the Clerk, United States Dj : . : District Court, at Statesville, North Carolina. 3. That defendant pay to the said Clerk of United States District Court at 3 , ‘atesville, North Carolina, the sum of $10.00 on or before March l, 1955, and e ach month thereafter, said payments to be applied first to costs, then interes+ i St, then Principal, until the judgment is paid in full. 4, the p) Plaintiff shall immediately thereafter be free to docket the judgment in the Supetior ¢ * “ourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, or in any other county in any State a * and shall be free to then levy execution on this judgment and to take any and all other legal steps to effect collection of the said judgment in full. That in the event defendant defaults in any one of said monthly payments, 4 pn nS nally ean 294 5. That so long as defendant pays the Clerk the monthly Payments hereing, Nadoye TT woRTR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT provided on this judgment, said judgment shall not be docketed in Any State oo, rt and execution shall not issue thereon. This, the day of December, 1954. ist Schools, Inc. ?amous Art Plaintiff WILSON WARLICK, U.- Sy Distt ~— YUL, I consent to the foregoing jukment: 3, J. James and Gertrude James .o Defendants James M. Baley, Jr. United States Attorney ; THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk By: | im F B istant U. S. Attorney : : be 6 ici ke Fate J. Beal, Assistant U. 5S. } of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for ‘ydement against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint wa: Attorney for defendant. summons issued in this action on the 3rd day of June, 1955 And it further appearing to the court that sai #5918 : ecece aaa N 3 F R COURT , - aan aiak Cages Peet ee of said complaint were servedm the defendant, E. IREDELL COUNTY UW 1955, and on the defendant, Gertrude James on the M. L. Johnson and wife, : And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other Elizabeth T. Johnson, * ; a tian | pleading has been filed by the defendat and no extension of ime to file pleadin Piaintitts ” ; 2 nas heen granted and that the time within which pleadings mav be filed has expire ++ i" : And it further appearing to the court from the verified com Curt Reid, , , , cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to Defendants * contract, namely, the sum of Two Hundred Seventy ‘ : Cle Superior This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Sup 7 Dollars, with interest thereon from the lst dav i earing : cetneie’ heave Court of Iredell County, on this the 4th day of August, 1955, and it app it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have 7 9 , ‘ > ’ f ‘ : ry - . : : ‘ment with all 0: ad 7 : — n to the Court that the Plaintiffs have made a satisfactory adjustmen “c Tecover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred Seventy-eight and ‘ ‘ ; ut of the F a9" A\ the Defendants and that none of them now make any claim growing ou 278,20) Dollars, with interest thereon from the lst day of May, matters and things alleged in the Complaint; “osts of this action, 7T ‘ : ntation ‘ It is, therefore, upon motion of the Plaintiffs and on represé This 12th day of August, 1955. Di etme a ; , : isfied of Plaintiffs’ Counsel that the parties to this action have been sat ’ ny Qn Cc S+h C. 0. omttn nr Clerk of the Superior Court. ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that this action be, and the same is, heresy non-suited and dismissed. The Plaintiffs are taxed for the cost of their action. Cc. G. Smith <= Clerk of Superior 4° Agreed to Attorneys fr Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants, Curt Reid and Bost Reid, et al. J. G, Lewis xe kK RK Ke Re Ke Ke me ew me we OK mH 296 1#6063 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cor $578h IREDELL COUNTY COURT yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY coh Wel 4 ‘ nll ai Plaintiff | grace POFKOT#) intiff, ) VS. JUDGM ENT ey JUDGMENT De T. Barker +c. Hill and Gray Hill, ) Defendant ) . Defendants. ) THIS CAUSE, comhg on to be heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk ¢: This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the Honorable the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judenent | ¢, 6, Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing against the defendant by default final; | so the Court from the statement of counsel that all matters of controversy set And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and sumors ot in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the plaintiff ssued in this action on the 9th day of June, 19553 has agreed to pay the amount of the costs of this action which she has already And it further appearing to the court that said summons together With @ copy paid, and the defendant has agreed to paythe balance of the costs of this action, of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 10th day of June, 1955: | s]] in full accord and satisfaction of the claims of the parties hereto, each And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other azainst the other; pleading has heen filed by the defendant and an extension of time to file pleadinss NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT IS CRDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the has deen granted but the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; S plaintiff be assessed with that part of the costs of this action which she has And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the already paid, and that the defendant be asses.ed with the balance of the costs cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk. money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Two Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty- This 18th day of August, 1955. one and 08/100 ($2,861.08) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 30th day of C. G. Smith _ Clerk Superior Court ee ene CONSENT Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff 2 eed Ve Ue ews have and recover of the defendmt the sum of Two Thousand, Eight Hundred Sixty- “torney for Plaintiff one and 08/100 ($2,861.08) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 30th day 0 fred G Chamblee ‘ttorney for Defendant November, 195L, and the costs of this action. mL, 2 - 1 This 12 day of August, 1955 /* Clerk of the Superior Court ee Se ee eS ee eS Ss UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE CIVIL NO, 299 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT ) ) Th 4 1) ; + ' h i ‘ sf This cause coming on te be heard, and being heard upon motion of James wr rT M. Baley, Jr., United States Attorney, and it appearing to the Court from the record in this cause that the facts are as follows: m [The complaint was filed and summons issued on July 19, 1955. and ’ ¢ ’ ‘. personally served on the defendant by the United States Marshal for this District ° n July 27, 19553; that no answer or other plea has heen filed by the QO. @ % fendants, and no appearance entered by them or anyone in their behalf: that this action is brought by reason of promissory note executed by the defendants on which they defaulted; that the amount due thereon is definite and certain; th the time for filing answer in this cause has expired; and that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for; IT i5, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff, the United States of America, have and recover of the defendants, C. G. and Kathleen Y. Steele, the sum of $668.49 with interest on $4655.23 at the rate of 5% per annum from June 30, 1955, urtil paid, and the costs of this action. The Clerk of this Court will certify a transcript of this judgment for docketing in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court for Iredell County, rf North Carolina. This, the 16th day of August, 1955. Wilson Warlick WILSON WRLICK, U.S. District’ lag rt) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE CIVIL NO. 301 fea STATES OF AMERICA Ve JUDGMEN JOHN W. MILLER a This cause, coming on to be heard, and being heard upon motion of lanes M. Baley, Je, United States Attorney, and it appearing to the Court fron the record in this cause that the facts are as follows: That complaint was filed and summons issued on July 25, 1955, and personally served on the defendant by the United States Marshal for this district on July 27, 1955; that no answer or other plea has been filed by the defendant, and no appearance entered by him or anyone in his behalf; that this action is brought by reason of payment of subsistence allowance to which the defedant was not entitled; that the time for filing answer in this cause has expired; and that plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed fors IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff, the United States of America, have and recover of the defendant, JOHN W. MILI the sum of $329.25 taether with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from ‘ovember 27, 1950, until paid, and the costs of this action. The Clerk of this Court will certify a transcript of this judgment for docketing in the Office of the Clerk of Superior Court for Iredell County, ‘orth Carolina. This, the 15 day of August, 1955. s Wilson Warlick WILSON WARLICK, U. S. District Judge. zkearek & % eek kk Rk FS ene = nS Y6117 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR coupr IREDELL COUNTY Joyce Caldwell, by her next friend, Mary Lucille Caldwell, Plaintiff, od ba Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THTS CATISR Coamine t i a j j THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigne; Resident Judge of the 22nd Judicial District of North Carolina, and it being madeto appear to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendant have reached an agreement to settle, compromise and adjust all matters and things in controversy between them by the payment by the defendant to the plaintiff of the sum of One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars, and the Court, after making inquiry into the circumstances under which the cause of action arose and into the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by th e minor plaintiff, being of the opinion and finding as a fact that said settlement constitutes fair, justand reasonable compensation for the injuries sustained by the minor plainti! for the damazes allezed by the individual plaintiff and that said settlement is for the best interest of the minor plaintiff; 1EREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of On e Thousand ($1,000.00) Dolhrs in ull settlement, satisfaction and discharge of any and all liability of the lefendant to the plaintiff on account of the matters and things alleged in the al woo Sone : . . e ; i 13 f Complaint, and in full satisfaction and discharge of any and all liability © +) A ra) - wn > + r ° o . . ‘ tert ne defendant, Zetta J, Pinkston, Utica Mutual Insurance Company, and Soutneas 4 en the Fire — Tnenr mnanty st ; i i i i i insurance Company arising out of the automobile collision giving risé cause Of action stated, It a. ° j ! 't further appearing to the Court tlat the bills of the following pers™ and insti ‘itution for services rendered the minor plaintiff have not deen paid, the Clerk of the followits vourt is directed to pay out of the recovery herein to person and institution the following amounts: Rte lg Us TAVIGE. xeccinsdnaiecua denne $ 50.00 LOWFORCG HOSPItS] «vcosncncnicsendeummmnaeue $103.25 y . trorney It further appearing to the Court that the Honorable Grant Bolmer, 4 h this 50.00 - : : 10 j s r he plaintiff, has rendered valuable lecal services in connection wit action, it j a ‘ 2 » it is hereby ordered that he be allowed a fee in the amount of $ dollars out of the total recovery herein. Te ta 8 ction ¢ t is further ordered that the defendant pay the costs of a assessed by the Clerk, This the 23rd day of August, 1955. Hubert_E O14 esident Judge CARPENTER & WEBB WE CONSENT: Mary Lucille Caldwell Next Friend By _ Charies = Grant Bolmer torney for the Plaintiff ttorneys = 7 301 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Monday, August 29, 1955 yoRTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY - Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 29th day of 4 f\e Vi } H3 Honor Hishan ey 11 4 are ust, 1955, at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where His Honor, Hubert E. Olive Ja Ayy AU iydee Presiding and holding Courts for this the Twenty-second Judicial District of North Carolina, Fall Term, 1955, is present and presiding, and Honorable leb Ae Morris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the Twenty-second judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the States J. C. Rumple, Hieh Sheriff, of Iredell County is present and opened Court by Order of the Courts. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as Jurors for this the rs hugust Term, 1955, Iredell County Superior Court, for the first week, to-wit: DD Queen Max Cloaninger William McLain Sherrill JL Lackey S ¢ Cline John Ralph Montgomery 8 L Tevepaugh, Jr L W Westmoreland John M Brown ] G Clendenin Arthur Hanks Carroll E Campbell W G Wrieht FM Bost William E Morrison James Henderson Clarence Moose BB Hil Grier Bustle Ta aot h ; ; arold H Tomlinson Paul F Deal tM Linker J F Billings J Turner Rupard Harry L Parker Hal Deal P D Lipe ‘omer E Harrington Clyde M Perry James C Southers VA Childers Joe T Hatcher L P Bell, Jr "8 Coffey, Sr George Chambers B W Chesson JD Cochrane, Jr Glenn Monev P S Hedrick Q OR Richardson WH Morrison E W Blackwelder, Sr 7 "1 Cates James E Levan W A Renegar N a “— Alvin Morrison Russell Lee Summers ye "" Spencer, Jr A J Starnes James W Long \ "liam Morrison is in the Army. \ JpC Schrane, Jr, J F Billings, L P Bell, Jr, excused by Court. PD Li - ‘pe &James E Levan excused by Court until 10/17/55. iy OR Ri ¢ swe hardson & Ww A Renegar excused by Doctor's Certificates. Ja mes ¢ Southers is a Minister. "6 wry h ent is a Non-Resident, Joe T Hat cher is a member of the National Guard. "gam McLain Sherrij} was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. J, R, Soforth Was Sworn as Officer in charge of the Grand Jury. Now 2204 & 2205 otate vs Laura Mae nter Stat ° vs Yavid Jonathan Clark ather Scott William Taladce Moore vs Albert Lee Cook W/M/51, INO 2328 “ State VS James Leroy Cowan C/Ni/2) <_< <= << <> oe oS <r oe <a oe ee a ee ee ee ee eee ee <—— <> he <> —<—~ << ae <<< <= =o IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK ----- AUGUST TERM. los: Monday, August 29, 1955 AID & ABETTING IN ASSAULT WITH INTENT ; Nol Pros With Leave, TENT TO Rapg POSSESSING 49 1/2 GALLONS NON-TAX Pap tron, POSSESSING 49 1/2 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID Te FOR PURPOSE OF SALE QUOR Continued. CRIME AGAINST NATURE (SODOMY) Continued by onsent. SESSING DRUNK DRIVING DRUNK: RESISTING ARREST: POS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: DRIVING DRUNK; A ; Continued. BASTARDY Continued for defendant. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ‘el ‘ , Continued. [ANUFACTURING LIQUOR Continued. NDOTWwINGA DITNY UNLVINY DRUNK Continued for the defendant. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. DRIVING DRUNK Continued for defendant. IrENss ' DRIVING DRUNK, 2ND OFFENSE: NO OPERATOR'S ort Remanded to Iredell County Recorder upon payment of the costs. DRIVING DRUNK te Court Remanded to Iredell County Recorder § upon payment of, the costS. ’ No. 172k State v8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK renee ene” AUGUST TERM, 1 Monday, August 29, 1955 DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias. << ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias. oo << ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. — ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Alias Capias. DRUNK & DISORDERLY Alias Capias. <a e S =o be ! 1771 ) PERMITTING MANUFACTURING OF LI state ) Continued under former order. vs T(E) backey No, 1831 State n Vv S heath Gull Taylor lo, 1858 State VS ‘aymon Saunders Spann “lo, 1870 otate 1S No, 182) State vs J, nr ve Kennerly No. Lage State, + ‘ameg Campbel] MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR Continued under former order. good behavior. << ee me ae ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON fsood behavior. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias. POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR. Continued under former order. FALSE PRETENSE Continued under former order. food behavior. ! ARANDON & NON-SUPPORT ’ Continued under former order. Continued under former order. A ppeared and showed I Appeared and showed Appeared. \No. 2371 State vs Thomas Ramsey Wo. 2219 State VS Willie H. Davis INo. 233] State vs Romie Lee Messick W/M/33 IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT FIRST WEEK Monday, August 29, 1955 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Defendant called and failed Fa ard Instanter Capias, POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Alias Capias. RASTARDY Called and Failed. [Instanter Capias. Judement & NON-SUPPORT Capias. NOTVINGA Nnorinyr DRIVIN 5 UR NK aS ts e re Alias Capias. Der 1 partment. HOOA a On ON FEMALE inued under former order. ™™ 9p AQaAIIT™ bi % ADSAULI t DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias. RAST ARDY Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Remanded to Mooresville Recorde payment of the costs. ILL ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO kK Nol Pros With Leave. NON-SUPPORT The defendant enters a plea of Nol AUGUST TERM, 1955 Detainer to he IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, August 29, 1955 Judgment Nisi Se} Noe 2315 ; State vs Ro * jlo. 2317 State vs + i “ No. 2373 state WS tesse Franklin Godfrev No. 2371 State vs 'mmie Harris No, 2249 State vs Willie H. Davis No. 2317 ’ State ] VS | lames Alva Phillips { filed with Prison No, 23°75 State VS lames Wayne vs Wade Jy nior Rj rdeo M/s Richardson Me, 2290 wtate ee ward Hal Vanhoy M/x2 r?g Court upon here, } oan Mijyg’ Ne*ekiah Gries > 0 Contendere: 4 s . i ect a wlll th eae ce EN pcs St nt ee ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Bill. BREAKING? ENTERING & ASSAULT A True Bill. ESCAPE A True ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WE A True Bill. BREAKING, ENTERING & ASSAULT The defendant enters a wrongfully, misdemeanor. Judgement is suspended ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMIT Not A True Bill. BREAKING, ENTERING & A True Bills DRIVING DRUNK The defendant enters a plea of zuilty as charged. JUDGMENT, let the defendant pay a fine Of #iUVerd and the costs. AID & ABETT IN DRIVING DRUNK ; : The defendant enters a plea of guilty of public drunkedness which plea the State acceptS. JUDGMENT, let the defendant pay a fine © and the costs. $50.00 NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: DRIVING DRUN ND OFFENSE : The se taaaaee enters a plea of guilty as charged in all cases. : JUDGMENT, nos. 2341, 2342, 2343 and 23) eT for judgment. Let the defendant be confined in (6) MONTHS Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of en Hi hway to be worked under the supervision of the State he deven- and Public Works Commission. In no. 2345, let C ty for dant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell eel nal a term of SIX (6) MONTHS to be worked under — Enis of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. on ras sentence to commence at the expiration oF Sine, 09 NOS. 23h1, 2342, 2343 and 23L4h. No. 2335 & 2336 State IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK AUGUST TERM, loss Monday, August 29, 1955 °°”? ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT 4 Bprcy. DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY Ck: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK AUGUST $2321) Monday, August 29, 1955 COURT ’ sod vs N rl Junior Smith The defendant enters a plea of Suilty of ma) eg ma M/16 damage to property and not euilty of isan Leioys +2EDELL COUNTY Deadly Weapon, whereupon the following rb © with 7 sworn and impanelled: 5 Jury J. L. Lackey W. A. Childers We R “i mm ‘ la bs Tevepaush, JY. he S. Coffey, Sr vs R 11 Je G. Clendenin Panl F. Deal ' | tewis Jeantene Draswe Clarence Moose W. He Spencer, Jr R. M. Linker Max Cloaninger Harry L. Parker James erson The Jury returned a verdict of/euilty.. : JUDGMENT , ae one races be confined in the ommon Jail of Irede ounty for a term of Tur : + da ant. Lew an : a) I 1 Of THREE : + efore. ordered that the defendant, Lew (3) MONTHS to be worked under the supervision of — the State Highway d Public W n any ; t wite schiein + os — o , ‘orks ‘OmM13S*0n, and the prosecuting witness, Rosa Lee This judgment 8 suspended or ONE (1) YEAR upon and th au + 4 , o 5 + Qa : ; ’ ° + ° pa} ment into the office 0 che Clerk ouperior Samii Lee Gunter submit themselves at the Davis Hospital, Statesvil Court the sum of $15.80 for the use and benefit % a of Thos H McAdams, and the pavment of the costs provided the defendant remains of good behavior e a 4 = f » 2 fr) : . ° a or said period of ime. Otherwise to be in fy] eck , ; : regen Te ee eee - ee a havi id b rrouping test accomplished and tha he defendan ay force and effect. having said blood ¢ Fr P he Ea c/ was State : f Upon the call of this case, the defendant, 4 ; hur ite 2 lood grouping test as provided by statutes Gunter and the tarolina, on or before the 15th day of September, 1955, for the purpose eC EN A A a I A ES expenses incurred. DRIVING DRUNK : ; cE . Vi Viiv seU il . . : QOge ore ¢ ' } . ; This e is et down for trial at the October 1955 Term o The defendant enters a plea of not guilty, his case is whereupon the following jury was sworn and impanellei Je L. Lackey We. A. Childers nn. 4 Tay yeh ] C fae 5 ie ~e .evepaugn, JN e e We sO fey, YT. Thi . 4 Os pe 3 “ . : ; This the 29th dav of August, 1955. J. G. Clendenin Paul F. Deal . Clarence Moose W. H. Spencer, dr. R. M Max Cloaringer, Superior Court. mn R. M. Linker Harry L. Parker James Henderson The Jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. JUDGMENT, let the defendant pay a fine of $150.0 and the costs. NN A William McLain Sherrill E. B. Hill James W, Long 1 . W. Westmoreland Now. 2373 L. W State vs -on 1 VJe@SSE SOUAF ib : The defendant enters a plea of guilty as charze) JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in te Common Jail of Iredell County for . of Okt J. I, Cates E. B. Chester (1) YEAR, to be assigned to work under the io supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is to begin at the expiration of the sentence in no. 9278 from | Arthur Hanks Chatham County. Harold H. Tomlinson John Ralph Montgomery Homer E. Harrington George Chambers S. C. Cline Clyde M. Perry ‘ Fa : fete meme we es ech tet Cc one Heme ee B. W. Chesson D. D. Queen ’ "al Deal Russell Lee Summers Carroll E. Campbell ESCAPE rr The defendant entera a plea of guilty oa emets* JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined Sa Common Jail of Iredell County for 4 re : (2) YEARS to be assigned to work under Mt Work supervision of the State Highway and Pu om Commissi is to begin at ¢ Commission. This sentence 1 0 et tras expiration of the sentence in #22-73 Mecklenburg County. this Honorahle Tuesday Morning, Court takes a recess until 9:30 o'clock As "y AUP St 30, 1955, ° 7 pBRBE Bike ae pt APID Breazeale v VS James Lee Rrown ‘No. 23064 State vs Homer B. Cashion No. 2307 State vs Leroy Watson Adams IN THE SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK AUGUST TERM Tuesday,August 30, 1955 + 1955 BASTARDY Court directs that Capi i lie f oO pias issue for the defendant, ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Court directs that Capias issue for the defendan: RITMAM 4 UA) A True Bill. NTERING & LARCENY 1 & LARCENY CENY OF AUTO True Pill. ITO 1. ,apeee a LARCENY OF A a Zz A True R4 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued. DRIVING DRUNK 2ND OFFENSE Continued. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEE AY Tam menu AUGUST TERM, Tuesday, August 30, 1955 flo, 2308 State vs arthur Je Wooten No . 23 1,9 State vs velvin Leroy Jack No. 2353 State vs Lake M. Shue y Tilghman Rappe,Jr No. 2350 State vs Kermit Lee Childers No. 2342 State VS William Thomas Brown No. 2363 State vs John Glaspy No. 2367, 2368, 2 otate vs ny n . enn Smith Inscore ‘No. 2376 State vs June Grantt Wo, 233] State V8 Romie 4/M/33 Lee Messick No. 232) State vs 4€W1s do LaViene, No. 236) state vs Junior ify ter Goble DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed. Jiudement Fa and Instanter Capias. MANSLAUGHTER Continued. DRIVING DRUNK 2ND OFFENSE Continued. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. BREAKING, ENTERIN LARCENY Continue POSSESSING NON-TAX Remanded to the FAIL TO HAVE DOGS VACINATED Continued. i 120 GALLONS NON-TAX PAI {TING AND POSSESSING 120 GA ae aren al 4 RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVING ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued. NON-SUPPORT : are JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the 6) Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of SIk ( MONTHS, assigned to work under the Supervis:on 0 the State Hiehway and Public Works Commission. BIGAM "Tal aabeania’ enters a plea of guilty as charged. : JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in eee Penitentiary at Raleigh for a term of not less t TWO (2) nor more than THREE (3) YEARS. LARCENY OF AUTO 1. G. Lewis The defendant through his Attorney, ve ve ”™ ’ enters a plea of guilty of temporary ST Te abe JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in tar. 1.) Common Jafl of Iredell County for a term of 1Wes ion of MONTHS to be assigned to work under the —* the State Highway and Public Works ore agre te This judeament is suspended »pon conditions Probation Judgment and to pay che 5 aaa aa THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST aes wecc----- AUGUST TERM, 1955 FIRST WEEK ---------- AUGUST Te Orr Tuesday, August30, 1055 TERM, 1955 Tuesday, August 30, 1955 x 6 J RATOR'S LICENSE: RESISTING ARREST: VING DRUNK Wo. 2360 SY BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Noss 2364, 2365 & nef - The ao tae dane through his fe A ll ra eee State The defendant enters a plea of temporary } State j Collier, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere tn han 2361 a. , JUDGMENT, let the defendant in confined 4 arceny, vs (Only) and 23653 and a plea of not guilty in No. 23664 wherac Vir¢il Patterson ga State Penitentiary at Raleieh for a term ty the 3, (Only) Ve hein upon the following jury was sworn and impanelled: { less than THREE (3) nor more than PIVE (5) yeas Scott \ W. H. Morrison Harry L. Parker *BAnO, ¢/M/32 : Glen Money W. A. Childers 7 2>r Rupar « de Starne BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY : Si atcetace, Sr. ut The defendant enters a plea of guilty of J. L. Lackey Max Cloaninger oe oo Pier valued at less than $100, 00° R. M. Linker James Henderson hrough | ttorney Mr. ‘urlineton, ' The Jury returned a verdict of ceuilty as charged. JUDGMENT, let the defendant he confined in th JUDGMENT, Nos. 2364, 2365 and 2346 are consolidated Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Ey : for judgment. Let the defendant he confined in ‘the SIX (6) MONTHS to he assigned to work under i Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (4) Supervision of the State Hishway and Public Works MONTHS, and with the permission of the County Commission. This judgement is suspended for a tom Commissioners to work said prison term at the County of THREE (3) YEARS on conditions the defendant _ Home and Farm or County Jail. If for any reason his be of stood behavior and not violate any of the ; work is not satisfactory at any time, then the remainder laws of the State of North Carolina for saig of the sentence is to be served on the roads under the period, and he is to pay the cost. Otherwise to ‘ supervision of the State Highway and Public Works be in full force and effect on motion of the _ | Commission. Solicitor. ) a Nos. 2346, 2347 &2318 NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: RECKLESS DRIVING: HIT & RUN Dp YAPAQAIN NON T r TOITOR “— rat eo : ‘ . . hr r POSSESSIN zs NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR State The defendant through his Attorney, Mr. W. R. _ The defendant through his Attorneys, Mr. J. 6, vs Battley, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere in No. 234 Lewis and Mr. Morrow, enters a plea of not guilty, # «Homer Linwood Johnson and a plea of guilty in Nos. 2316 and 2318. _ whereupon the following jury was sworn and impanelei: w/M/32 JUDGMENT, Nos. 2316, 2317 and 2318 are consolidated Glenn Money Grier Bustle for judgement. Let the defendant be confined in the Alvin Morrison William F. Livengood Common #il of Iredell County for a tem of TWELVE (12) A. J. Starnes « S. Hedrick MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision ' ‘ } n Saetin Cf§ COMMISSION. h r John M. Brown B. L. Tevepaugh of the State Highway and Public Wor J the sentence he ry ag Seager So aearEate 5 WA an a F. M. Bost J. Ge Clendenin This sentmce to run concurrently wi D. E. Benfield Clarence Moose is now serving from Burke The jury returns a verdict of cuilty as charged. JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined -in the Common Jail of Iredell County “or a term of s «6 NORTH CAROLINA PWELVE (12) MONTHS to he assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public IREDELL COUNTY Works Commission. This iudegment is suspended for : a term of TWO (2) YEARS On conditions the defen- istate dant be of sood behavior and does not violate _ vs anv of the laws of the State of North Carolina, eOree Arvil Southers and that he does not operate at his residence and one Rembeton a place known as Jackie's Country Club orspave Ho 12, 22 caliber anv form of business or entertainment or/any c ‘Le #747661, other way operate the place now known as Jackies ‘ Country Club for said period of time and that ‘ow comes Mrs. Eunice Southers and respectfully shows to tne pay a fine of $100.00 and the costs. Otherwise to be in full force and effect upon motion 0% I the Solicitor. n il A U <A eR ee ee 7 ee That George Arvil Southers was tried and sentenced at the May Term 1955 of I . Cc Lunsf : CE : hererpor sredell County Superior Court for themurder of Webster Colonel Lunsford. vtate : The defendant enters a ple@ of not guilty, wer Il eer the following jury was sworn and impanelled: That 6 t Charles Breazeale ‘| John M. Brown B. L. Tevepaugh at one Remineton, Model 12, 22 caliber rifle #7766 was alleged to F. M. Bost J. Ge Clendenin have Colonel - : “a9 . » ¢ 3 Webst e D. E. Benfield Clarence Moose ren used by George Arvil Southers in the fatal shooting of Webster Volon Grier Bustle R. L. Beaver Lunsforg William F. Livengood T. Le Coffey ‘i : P. S. Hedrick W, He SP eeity ees The jury returned a verdict of ceo in the Ii JUDGMENT, let the defendant be con ” A , , , not That ; : . ° 5 arty State Penitentiary at Raleigh for 4 ters) YEARS» Said Remington, Model 12, 22 caliber rifle #747664 is the proper) less than THREE (3) nor more than FIVE ( i INO. 2372 LARCENY OF AUTO your Sas ‘ : ats Petitioner and said gun was in the possession of George Arvil Southers wit} rhOut t t he knowledze or consent of your petitioner and was taken from the "esiden Ce of : ss your petitioner in her absence. IV 7 2 ; hat. the court ordered said rifle turned over to the Clerk of Superior “Ourt of Iredel] County for such disposition as provided by law. 312 That your petitioner is informed and believes, and so alleges, that this IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------------ AUGUST TERM, 1 Tuesday, August 30, 1955 a V one of the cases covered by the General Statutes of North Carolina wherein the Clerk of Superior Court is authorized to sell said rifle, WH Wa ts REFORE, vour petitioner respectfully pravs the court that the Clerk of Superior Cout of Iredell Coun be authorized and directed to return saiq rifle to and 7 + os further relie as your petitioner, its rightful and lawful owner and for such other may be just and proper. McLAUGHLIN and BATTLEY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, August 30, 1955 42360 voRTH CAROLINA zi IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Stats OF sity OF IREDELL avg OF NORTH CAROLINA Vs ORDER vTRGIL PATTERSON } This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the Aurust before the undersigned of Iredell County Superior Court Judze jefendant, Virgil Patterson, having been returned to court as a robation, and a report of said violations being made to the Court by Tom Bys W. R. Bat ‘ ees ' ea : y _* »_ Battley . omesnell. State Probation Officer, whereupon the Court finds the following facts: Attorneys for Petitioner i aie coe That at the January 195 Term of Superior Court of Iredell County hefore Ut A UL t A -REDELT. COUNT the Honorable J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding, the above defendant entered a INnBUeLi ; * Sct ; plea of guilty to a charge of breaking, entering & larceny and was sentenced b rs. Eunice Southers, after being duly sworn, deposes and says: that she : ty ; = : es : : : Py : the Cont to a term of Twelve (12) months in jail to be assigned to wor nder the is the petitioner in the foreeoing Petitions that she has read the foregoing mi 3 ; ( ; een : 2 ee ines aa ; supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, this sentence heing Petition and knows that the contents thereof are true to her own knowledge 3 r, , : . ; ae suspended and the defendant placed on probation for a period of three (3) vears except those matters and things stated therein upon information and belief and : Z sages P if ‘ 3 under the Ipervision + N + s > Lats an n oe . ° + FFI pare as to these, he believes i+ to be 4run Supervision cf the North Carolina Probation Commission and SO cers, under the usval conditi f tion the ecial condition that he pav the Mee. Eunice Sea sonditions of probation and the special condition that he p M Eunice osouthe sone ' ar as seat MYSe inice Southers bs ost of this action on or hefore the April 1 f 195k Term. Sworn to and subscribed hef e Coy ‘ : : ay a C efore me, vourt further finds that the defendant has violsed his conditions of this the 13th day of August, 1955. drottion as follows: erases so DE * Carson that at the Aucust 1955 Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, this rohationer plead oi 14 + e Pa . > tr s Ta : na R epivine : ead cuilty } z reakineg, Entering, Larceny and Receivins commisSion expires: Septemher 22, 1956 © a charge of Breaking, En — 7 *rom whi : ; This is i "wich eh received a sentence of 3 to 5 vears in State's Prison. nis 1S in Violation of that pare se 7 Tau ny pa gh ee eas a a ; nat condit i f hati whi he shall "Violate no penal law NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT I on of probation which savs he shall I 0! any State 0 + . ‘ eo s as at€ or the Fede 1. ¢ h £ - ad hehavior". IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST 1055 TERM ederal Government and be of general good ha NOW. TH RE : . : e State ", THEREFORE, it is ordered and adjudged that the former judgment o Vv oe rohation ha ee a 4 cat. 4 George Arvil Southers ORDER ; 7) She Chee Che WORe aactenee-of twelve (12) months tn jal) -0 and one Remincton °€ a8sioned ; My WOM LY n gene t wr ot Ne oe ; sel 2 a hy Works Model 12, 22 caliher © work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Vorks Rifle #A7TLI4E! Onmissj F es ‘ ~*9S10 14 an 3 n, heretofore suspended, is ordered into effect; this sentence is to hors - Thi “ : ; Eunice soutic>: 2 Coney ‘N1S cause coming on to k i f Mrs. Sunic ‘oncurren i , 1 to be heard upon the Petition o . t with the sentence in Docket #2360. and being ear a . . st 1955 T n ( heard, before the undersigned Judge Presiding at the Augu his 30th day of August, 1955. 7 e Lerr of Irede rr . . a . that th -dell County Superior Court and it appearing to the Court Hubert E. Olive oe UDGE PRESIDING Remington M : k of JUDGE PRESI ington Model 12, 22 caliber rifle #71766 was delivered to the Cler ‘ Superior Court for q ing KR RK Re ee Ok KR ee me , a ; ar isposition as provided by law; and it further appe from said Petition that r of said Mrs. Eunice Southers is the rightful owne — : rifle and entitled to Possession thereof: It dell 18, therefore, ordered that the Clerk of Superior Court of It Count ; ; Ounty deliver possession of said rifle to Mrs. Eunice “outhers- Hubert. £20 i Received the above rifle this lst day of Sept, 1955+ Ww. Re Battle 2) Mrs. Eunice This the 30th day of August, 1955. * ok ok ke ek ok wk | 315 _ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WER w<~-<+= “AUGUST TERM, 1966 PIRST WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 1055 Tuesday, August 30, 1955 Wednesday, August 31, 1955 GRAND JURY REPORT FAILING TO ABATE NUISANCE The defendant through his Attornev. Mr. W. R. FB vay enters a plea of Nolo Contendere, , ; JUDGMENT, prayer for judgment continued for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS; and judement be at any tine during said period bv the Soli defendant operates the business in question ¢ nuisance, and the defendant is to pav the cos Nos 2359 AUGUST TERM, 1955 “state to vs The Grand Jury passed on all bills of indictment presented to them | 21; Campbell so CS oy the This Grand Jury recommends that the Solicitord I redell County Recorder', Court issue warrants upon those citizens who have failed to list NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: DRIVING DRUNK seats The defendart. enters a plea of cuilty as charged “ both cases. — : Fs william Leonard Owens JUDGMENT, Nos. 2337 & 23F are consolidated for 2 , judgment. Let the defendant he confined ir C jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (A) MONTH he assigned to work under the s rvisi he § +} Highway and Public Works Commission. With permission and of the County Commissioners to work the defendant ’ around the jail or County Home. their properties Ales. 2337 & 2338 for taxes. Committees visited and inspected the following County properties: w//31 COUNTY JAIL a x $ Mm C Oo nee Oo + t D Members of the Grand Jury were conducted on a tour of the county jail hy et Ce I TE the jailor and found the jail to be in excellent condition. The following iF 3 » @) = ry n x t * oO 3 Qu. ee x 3 D . wa nae \ j f " re ur ny : 9 DER N white er ales, wenty-three (23) white males, NOs 2278 SPEEDING The defendant enters a plea of cuiltv of speeding 55 mph in a 35 mile zone. JUDGMENT is suspended upon payment cf the costs State vs : l Melvin Derr dr ss ae dae ohn Melvin Der Ps PRISON CAMP 4 M/37 three (3) colored ferales, nineteen (19) colored males. At the prison carp we found it to be in excellent condition with a total ‘ape a RA alee ‘DTT ny DrIn DRIVING DRUNK The defendant through his Attorney, Mr. W. R. Battley . vio. 2227 of prisioners. he three compartment sink recommended by a previous Grand State - \ ee ee i} , a 4 1 | . - ‘ vs enters a plea of not guilty, whereupon the followir i . rv was too sma L] when $4 arri ved. A replacement has heen or Jered and is Sar Eugene Sims jury was sworn and impar elleds i Glenn Money James Henderson J. Turner Rupard F. M. Post W. A. Childers D. E. Benfield A. Je Starnes Grier Bustle Paul F. Deal William F. Livengood COUNTY HOME i. AME ame ? OQ of ) oO 3 + je) _— -) Trt > 3 ® < 3 3 . w - » . ee a on Se a eS a sommittee inspected the Countv Home and found the following: Max Cloanincer P, S. Hedric} The Jury returns a verdict of not guilty. o lents? h een (233 white males, twenty {20) white females, four (h) TrO als oy 4 Ver {r ) nezro woren, : risioners?: two a4 nerro males, 0. 2285 | ASSAULT ON FEMALE (7) state ' Nol Pros With Leave. one \i] nerro womane 3 vs { ack Woods | ‘} 3: : a ’ . . ‘ « ss ‘ a C/M ne general conditions of the buildings and sanitary conditions were g C/M/25 i ood. The srounds were found to he in fair condition and it is ™ ; w'lo. 2286 ecommendation ¢ his Grand Jury that a little more help be furnished to vuate mn . wu @D up the er eee ; ; ack Wood bt ‘} f Cc na an ; hoe l ) wi + h the f rm ¢ it ssc a b arm d les 0/M/25 LARCENY It appearing to the Court and the Court 1aS as a fact that the change upon which the suspended sentence in this case was put into effect has been Jol Prosed and therefore that the terms of the suspended sentence has not heen violated hy the change in tne +ho Waa find COURT HOUSE case of 2225: therefore this case is remanded to Iredell County Recorder's Court. : ; ions of the Court House to be good. However, it 1 the CP amr Aas e Ls cn y 1 + ; e ‘ ommendation of this Grand Jurv + hat something be done to improve th «ilo 2185 mi ° C NIQ » UILDING i State CONSPIRE TO BURN BUILDING a Chamblee a | = > in the court room which at present were found to be very pole : The defendart through his Attorneys, "Ir. Fred G. a - e ‘ ° a l t, B, 3t ; /s/ Willian Mclain Sherril WN/$7 aton : s th? uw pLe Mr. John McLauchlin & Mr. W. R. Battlev, enters ano of not euilty, whereupon the following jury was § and impanelled: . 4 irt At the close of all of the State's evidence See on rules as a matter of law that there is ee reutts bis evidence to go to the Jury and therefore ‘on case. 1055, Thie Hanarak n f ‘ st 31, : This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Mornings Me at 9:30 o'clock A, M a > WF oS alls Nos. 2318, 419 & 2320 State vs Wilford Eugene Dillard w/M/21 wn = D< A D rov Cowan Bre ae ViaCk iOOdcS \ (190 7 t MN - + nN wNoSe 225k & 2255 State vs Hennon James Johnson “No. 2272 state vs Hovle Cleveland Whitlow vNo. 2282 State vs Leon Norris Sharpe -No. 2315 State vs A. R. Robertson see arnae SRR Ne TT RD IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -~----~---- AUGUST TERM, Wednesday, August 31, 1955 1955 NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE The defendant enters a plea of charged in all three cases, JUDGMENT, Nos. 2318, 2319 &% 2320 are consolidated for judgment. Let the defend be confined in the common jail of Iredel] County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and th County Commissioners are authorized to work, him around the jail or County Home and i? not needed there to be worked under the | superviston of the State Hirchway and Public Works Commission. : RECKLESS DRIvryo. Zuilty as Paes Ts Se es die ra SPEEDING The defendant throuch his Attorney Mr, W R. Battley, enters a plea of guilty of-speedize 55 mph in a 35 mile zone. ; . Let the defendant be confined in the Comnor Jail of Iredell County for a term of SIxty | (40) DAYS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Hichway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the payment of a fine of $50.00 and the costs. A DRIVING DRUNK Strike out and failed. Capias. former order. Defendant called Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Mee ee ee ASSAULT ON FEMALE It appearing to the Court that the defendart was hrought in on an Instanter Capias and that the case has been disposed of, it is therefore ordered that the Nisi Sci Fa judgement be striken out. we ee ee ee DRIVING DRUNK Continued. “ , mn ' 1 (TW ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A SHOT GSUi Continued. <x <a BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY: BREAKING & BNiss" Continued. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A PISTOL WITH INTENT TO KILL CONtinued. SToL ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A PI WITH INTENT TO KILL Continued. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Wednesday No. 2295 State vs Thomas Lee Lynch Se State vs Lewis Jeantene Braswell } { | i Noe 2325 State vs Fannie Scott No. 2332 State vs Frank Roosevelt 4. Gillespie yNo. 2339 State } vs | George Edith Mayfield | No ’ 23 LO State vs Roy (NMN) Gregory vNoss 2303, 2304 & 2305 State vs William Larry Charles -No. 2308 State vs Arthur J. Wooten #609) ae sini (ORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY VIVIAN VOSS SPEAKS VS MARY WILMA FOSTER SPEAKS \ Were the plaintiff ANSWER: Yes, Have the plaintiff Prior to the institution ANSWER: Yes, Has ¢ , August 31, 1955 DRIVING DRUNK Continued. NON-SUPPORT Continued. DRIVING DRUNK CONTINUED. u Qc MD AaUrTA m1rIm tA BREAKING, ENTERING Continued. same aies MURDER: Jar ASSAULT WITH DEAD SAPC ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. ar mut IPR] TAL I IPR 2 IN In ov 4h LOR eed HH wm x and defendant married as al 26 and defendant lived separate and ap of this action? 36 Six mon ths Prior to the institution of this action? ANSWER: Yes, PATN TTONOT rALD LIQUOR INV Ke anni wre fue LY WAPON Wilh INIBN cates Recah tik se WI’ INTE O KILL leged in the complaint? he plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Caro MBER 1955 TERM AUGUST - SEPTEM art for two years lina for a hence ne aR See ENT RDN ars —— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ee FIRST WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 SECOND WEEK ----~ - oe ae 1955 Wednesday, August 31, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 urt venes according to adiournment on Tnesdav NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT This Honorable Court con Journment on esday AUGUST - SEPTEMBER , 955 00 otfclock A. M. IREDELL COUNTY 1955 TERM 1955 at D yorning, Sept «6, ch Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the J. C. Rumple, H,gh She into open Cour he : per re names 6 the following vood and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this in SUDGMENT a second week of the August Term, 1955, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: MARY WILMA FOSTER SPEAKS ) 1. oe E. L. Swann Si hile ee ae cnory Re Summers R. R. Compton This cause coming on to he heard and being heard hefore His Honor, Huber: i, 7, Burgess V. T. Menster E. Olive, Judge Presiding, and ajury, and the following issues having been trady Se Knox Hal R. Stewart answered in favor of the plaintiff: : ‘ales hn Os Pertter Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 1, 8 Orren W. F. Morrow ANSWER: Yes. ¢, P, Mott R. W. Cody Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for two years ¢, P. Vinson Luther A. Lippard “prior to the institution of this action? Fred Walker Ramsev BEB. H. McJunkin ANSWER: Yes. Prank A. White R. C. Johnson Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for J, 2, Morris A. L. Morris six months prior to the institution of this action? Jade A. Morrow Holland C. Reid ANSWER: Yes. 1, R, Redmond R. R. Morgan IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the bonds of loseph C, Morrison Je Re Little matrimony existing hetween the plaintiff and defendant, be and the same are (. W. Mooney Nathan Lyerly here dissolved, and the plaintiff granted an absolute divorce. Clrde R. Moore C.B. Moore This the 3lst day of August, 1955. 4, M. Sloop Millard V. Ketchie Hubert 2. Olive Thomas E, Kerr Iva Lee Campbell JUDGE PRESIDING J. T. Overcash, W. F. Morrow, Luther A. Lippard, Frank A. White, and “*eeth 2 Oo De BO. OS BUS “+ R Morgan were excused by Court vv ibe Ha} Q : ; nal R, Stewart is in the Armv. R r oS a hy te C. Johnsen, J. R. Little, and Thomas E. Kerr were excused b} “ocor's Certificates Av GUC e | Pag se Morris is a non-resident. m™ A : i ; ey he following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1 to-wit: EL. § ; — Emory R. summers nr © ie Lom = rent W. F. Burgess M * ™enst ae Grady S. Knox St : ewart G. B. Parlier 0 oe R. We. Cody ~o ae nver 6 1 Fred W. Ramsey i ] Wy i , LS honorable Court takes a recess until Taesday Moring, Septem at 10:00 o'clock A. M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1055 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 ° ’ 7 #6081 North Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County ER. Fs Shinn Issues n oe ee 08 08 of rr 2 hee residen rx Stat f N : na Sident of the State of North Carolina for is eee 1. Has the plainti more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2 on x, on 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleced in the complaint’ 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived arate and apart continuously for two vears next preceding the institution of - ih Ss act on? ) ‘ "eo Vv AliSWwe ° es E ‘ orth Carolina 7 7 , $ A arsawt a In The Superior Court ra eit "5 "+ f Shen, ° ° s @ i e s : Cc . S : Judgment . : Lois F,. Shinn : This cause coming on to he heard hefore Honorable Hubert E. Olive, Judge ivil Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and being nes re said Hon hle Huhertr F 1 4 4 ; r ore said Honorable Hubert E. Olive, and a Jury, the following issues were § tted LO the Jurvs ] ree ea a ; : a ‘ for 1, Has the plaintiff heen a resident of the State of North Carolina %° mc nan S1x mont hs next preceding the institution of this action? ) UF ier ae ee ; int! he ere the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the compla 2 . W tne Sn+ 4 3 j - Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived f eee : renwtaentan of Separate and aprt continuously for two years next preceding the institut? ine Jvury havine answered all of the said issues "Yes", Té is. thacat x hat the » “nererore, by the Court ordered, adjudged, and decreed t hk i nt oonds of matrimony h d the defenda eretofore existing between the plaintiff an vorce from the gainst ‘ ild, i8 be f ) feaaen? Orever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a dt defendant te Pan a ndant, Lois F, Shinn, and that the costs of this action be taxed plaint ite by the Clerk, n, minor ch and the custody of Barbara Anne Shin © , + T * rdere? awarded to Lois F. Shinn, and the plaintiff H. F. Shinn, the father 18° § r + $a id © pay the sum of $60.00 per month to Lois F. Shinn for the support minor child, This 6th day of September, 1955, Me ok oe ook oe oe oe oe sea oe oko IN THE SUPERIOR COURT D WEEK ---------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 SECON Tuesday, September 6, 1955 14107 “CRT CAROLINA ‘RSDELL COUNTY AUGUST , Cannon LaVigne, ie Frances B $ + xe tran Plaintiff, =“ * ,ATIMA vs LQO0')/ BO ve , Ir rand i LaVigne, Jl e Louse Defendant, 1, Did the plaintiff and the defendant participate in a marriage ceremony'as ‘ : 9 alleged in the Complaint: Answer: YeSe T 2, Did the defendant, Louis J. LaVigne, Jr., have a living wife at the time of said purported marriage from whom he was not divorced? Ve Answer? Yes. 3, Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina “or a period of a least six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answers Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST 1955 TERM frances B, Cannon LaViene, Plaintiff, * vs # JUDGMENT Lang T T . : 4OULS J, LaVigne, oPs xe Defendant, * ‘his cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, at the August 1955 Term at t th ’ ‘ » : TI: 1 I m+ EK ( s+raA he Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Hubert E. Olive, Judge P $Aa4 re ‘ es Anon ds © residing and a Jury, and the jury having answered the Issues su mitted “0 it as follows: 4 l. Did the Plaintiff and the defendant participate in a marriage ceremony 48 allezed in the Complaint? Answer: Yes, 2. the Did the defendant, Louis J. LaVigne, Jr., have a living wife at ‘ime of said purported marriage from whm he was not divorced? Answer: Yes, Has the Plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for a period of at . oo . . n? least six months immediately preceding the commencement of this act1o Answer: Yes, it 4 : “S) therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said purported "arriag *® Detween the plaintiff, Frances B. Cannon LaVigne and the defendant, louj : and re, be and the same is hereby declared to be null a This the 6th day of September, 1955. Hubert. E. Olive Judge Presidng Kok kK ok ok ke wk a we Re OH fil IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- --- AUGUST TERM, 10955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 #6110 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY Ethel Cashion Campbell, } Piainceite VS LZSSUES James Lester Campbell, Defendant { l. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged jy the complaint? ANSWER: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North fi 1 Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? AiO W ; Yes. 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart fron each other for two years next preceding the brinzine of this action’ ANSWER: Yes. UN CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT LREDELL CC + a Q e : " on wal 5 5 utnei Casnion Campbell, } lain r WU oa nf T V2 uv J D J N C ames Lester Campbell, Defendant { Ths cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Hugh H. Olive, Judge Presiding and a jurv at the September 1955 Term of the °upers0 Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has ’ ceen propery s 3 P : ing 0 served personally with process, and the following issues havin sudmitted to and answered by the jury: u * , . . lat j in - Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleges the complaint? ANSWER : "Yes". ¢. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide residentof the State of North Car ‘ - 2 : = ‘ s 7 varolina for sixmonths next preceding the bringing of this action: ANSWER: "Yes", H . * : eS rt frot 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and &P8 each oth f two v ; : : ion? her for two years next preceding the bringing of this action ANOWERS "Yagtt, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ND WEEK ----- - AUGUST TERM, 1955 PP lacsday, September, ©, 1955 wo THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, ’ 1 Cashion Campbell, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from trhel Ua b } tnat th honds f matrimony ca ne defendant, James Lester Campbell, and tha ne bonds of matrimony heretofore ‘ering between the plaintiff and the defendant he and they are hereby dissolved exist » ; and it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action cn he taxed DV the Clerk. This 6th day of September, 1955. udge Presiding ae ‘“ ” gee TN TEE SUPERIOR cc 4 CAROLINA ™N THE PERIOR CC nen shee “OND Tryp y ATI( < ai IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST 1°55 ee . annie Relle Howard, p 3 + 2¢# Plain . vs * LovU Lo ‘uth Lee Howard, Defendant, 1, Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as 4a. Anger Yes, fn 2, Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes, ), Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the filing of this complaint’ Answer Yes, STH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT CREDELL COUNTY AUGUST 1955 TERM annie Belle Howard, * Plaintiff, * vs ‘ JUDGMENT gn Lee Howard, Defendant, * This can ' ; T 1955 “cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the August Term, © 7 Supa PY aw 44 Tor Court of Iredell Olive, Judge Presiding . tres T y Re County before His Hanor, Hubert 4. and . } 4 * Jury, and the juy having answered all the Issues submitted to it in the vor Of the Plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in ung beaeers - ad »* @PPearing to the court that there was born of the marriage of the plaineit’ and « "Me defendant one child who is over 21 years of age and is now married. T ‘ ; __“ 8, therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony erat 7 “lor : : me are ° existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and gitine: : ha "bY disso] divorce from the der ved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute Je end . ‘ “"dant,, Thig : the 6th day of Sepember, 1955. O¢ () 3 | See ren di mull OK ke ke eke ok otek ok ke oe *° 8 eae ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK AUGUST TERM, 1955 SECOND WEEK -----~- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 ; $ n rn : NORT L Now, therefore, on motion 01 Fred Je Chamblee, Attorney for the NORTH CAROLINA fat ++ N THR ary j t. 4 re judged, and decre tha » Wakes ee o TREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT sjaintiff, it 18 ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintirr ? NOUS UUUNI IT t netrer Blackwelder be and she is hereby granted an ahsolute di livorce from Q ster Blackwelder, vye defendant Clyde Cecil Blackwelder, and that the bonds o matrimony an Pp sntiff $ > fe ” , + Plainti : neretofore existing hetween the plant and the defendant he and they are + . 2 oo noreby dissolved, and it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay ths Rlackwelder, a? this action to he taxed by the Clerk. Defendant. This 6th day of September, 1955. tiff and defendant lawfully marrie d as alleged in the - . AC Sc ] une ¢ mplirt resic ent £ +he 1+ a} feWN +; residen Le) ne ovate oO North Carolina ~ this action? i aL se + defendant lived separate and apart from each other is the bringing of this action? Carl Bynum, Defendant 1, Did the plaintiff and the de€éndant intermarry 1 wi # 4 i fe, as allered in the Complain Tete t oon Answer: Yes, 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and 1i ror e » } * rom each other, and have the lived separate and apart from each “an WwO years continuously prior to the institution of this actio Answer: Yes, + } oe i 3. Has the plaintiff heen a bonafide resident and being heard before His Honor Huber ore tha six r +} * i jury at the August-September Term of the 1x months prior to the commencement of Answer; Yes, and it appearing to the Court that personally served with process, and the following } "onTu a wes da CAROLINA ‘ <een to and answered by the jury s IN THE SUPER 1OR evens EDELL COUNTY AUGUST - SEPTEMBER iff and defendant lawfully married as alleged ?m° % TERM 1055 iia §, B %+ Bynum, Plaintiff } ee i JUDGMENT th ar] Bynum, Defenda: L! - ~ . . ~ » 1 nt Has the plaintiff been a hona fide resident of the state of Nor ! ’ This ¢ Carolin a » ee ad +5 action: ause coming $s term the arolin a for six months next preceding the bringing of this 4 ne on to be heard and being heard at this ter! of “UPerior ¢ a bene. sons vOourt £ ‘ QP a4 ANSWER: Yes. of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor Hubert. E. Olive, Idee D 7 lav . Sane 2 4 o : i t itted to Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fro jury, and the jury having answered the issues sudm hy theCourt ? in f ; ; t out ij for two years next preceding the bringing of this action’ n favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as 5° out in the + “*tords, It j ‘ herefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of inony hep ®tofore existing between the plaintiff, Julia S. Bynum, and the ‘*fendant “arl Bynum, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is geearee ® absolut © divorce from the defendant. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding Keke ke ek ke ke kK eK OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 o Tuesday, September6 1955 ” _#608L North Carolina #083 In The Superior Coy Yorth Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County rt or Court tredell County Veronica Anita Damato sare Bee ive vs : Issues yS ; Issues Michael Anthony Damato : ° george Franklin Frye 1, Has the plaintiff heen a resident of the State of North Carolina for 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina ¢ = tor , . : . . : nore than six months next preceding the institution of this action? more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? a Answer: Yes Answer: Yes. 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? ry * w& 3 Q. 2. Were the plainti defendant married as allevred in the tne 4 Answer: YeS. complaint? 3, Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate Answer: Yes. y ee ; and apart Continuously for two vears next preceding the institution of this 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separ: : : S action? and apart continuoudy for two years next preceding the institution of this actin’ Answer: Yes. Answer: Yes. : : Yorth Carolina lorth Carolina op sae aaperter Vou In The Superior Court Iredell County Tredel] Count Sarah Leona Frve : Veronica Anita Damato : ° : vs z Judgement vs : Judgment : ; seorge Franklin Frve : Michael Anthony Damato : This cause comine on to be heard hefore Honorable Hubert E. Olive, Judge This cause coming on to he heard hefore Honorable Hubert 3. Clive, : ‘residing over the August Civil Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and being Judge Presiding over the August Civil Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and ‘sard before said Honorable Hubert E. Olive, and a Jury, the following issues being heard before said Honorable Hubert E. Olive, and a Jury, the following / vere submitted to the Jurv: issues were submitted to the Jury: se foe 1, Has the plaintiff heen a resident of the State of North Carolina 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina '° aoa ‘ ore than six months next preceding the institution of this action: more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? int? ‘ ss 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as albged in the compiaint: 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complain 4 - Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they liv? Sa separate | : : Smatititi e bitution 0 and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution © sep t ry ¢ ee dh aie casa : al separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the ins his action? this action? See The J vury having answered all of the said issues "Yes". The Jury havine answered ‘a tae "Yes" y naving answered all of said issues “Yes”. I : d that the “tds, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged, and decreed that Lae it it there far : da decree 4 1S, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged, and ae onds of f . " + ? Matrimony he £ : : + 3 tiff and the de endant d the defend” “i sretofore existing hetween the plaint bonds of matrimony hereto? ist4 intiff an ° trimony heretofore existing between the plaintif ‘Orever q3 i ; ? dissolved, and theplaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo be forever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce t Tom ‘ the defendant action be ‘9 * tae osts of this George Franklin Frye, and that the costs of this vinculo from the defendant, Michael Anthony Damato, and that the ¢ axed against chile | the plaintiff by the Clerk. action be taxed arainst the plaintiff by the Clerk. This 6th day of Sukie sos yY Of September . sptember, 1955. ; Hubert. E. Olive mien Hubert. E, Olive Judge Presiding ————Judge Presidins x KR ke kk ek ke ee Ke HOR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Sage galt AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 SECOND WEEK --~ AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 #6080 P North Carolina {sors ORT In the Superior Court NOR iREDBLL COUNTY sot CAROLINA Iredell County Dave Milstead Plaintiff ‘1a Munday Woods, plaint at. -vs- Issues. VSe Nena Milstead iogeph Fe Woods - defendant ee ba U cn a C o is Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the (1) Were the Plaintiff and Defendant married, as allered in the hain hae 9 v yomplaint : Ans. Yes. ANQWER VY = ‘ . im : or ‘ n ANSWER Yes. hig lias the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North : ee (2) Have the Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart from each Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? other for two (2) years next preceding the commencement of this action? : ANSWER Yes. Ma Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each (3) Has the Plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for other continuously for two vears next preceding the bringing of this action’? six (6) months immediately preceding the commencement of this actior AY 5 6 Yes. ANSWER Yes. ort Carol 4 ms In the Superior Court sORTH CAROLINA Ire 7ont N THE § IOR CC AN GU BLL COUNTY AUUWUO1 ly 1 Dave lstead i 1. a Plaintiff 1a Munday Woods, ) } Plaintiff ) -vSs- Judgment ) | VS. ) J U J ‘ a Milstead ne ) Defendant { seph F, Woods, ) . Defendant ) “ae Thea aes ee : ‘ ‘ . tia se Hubert = This cause coming on to he heard and beme heard hefore His Hgnor huve wig inis cause corine on to he heard before the unde rsi nh >q Judce holding se Olive, Judre Presiding and jury at the September Terr of the Superior Vout tut r 1) . ) ’ : ood am reguiar term of Iredell Superior Sourt and a jury, and the ry having of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defndant has been ee | | nd the veered the issues submitted to them in favor of the Plaintiff, and against Dro ve vv 2a 5 + +} > . £3 - anc wn 5 ae r oe properly served with process by personal service by an officer of the 14M, © Defenda ue ~“Sndant as appears in the record; ollowing issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: It 3 , ; W lleged in th “’ “8, therefore, ORDERED, CONSIDERED AND ADJUDGED that the bonds o 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as a+%¢6 rriage h “> “eretofore existing between the Plaintiff and Defendant be, and the Complaint? same » are hereby dissdved and set apart and the Plaintiff is granted an absolu Answer Yes ORE . ree from the defadant: larth i a) : ‘ 3 ‘ a f Nort! 2. Has the phaintiff been a hona fide resident of the State ° te 9 18 further ordered that the Plaintiff pay the cost of this act ions Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action: 01 i Hubert &. Vlive _— Answer Yes, Judve Presiding from pos art ir 3+ Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and 4P a ee ton’ cata ¢ this act each othercontinuously for two years next preceding the bringing 0 th Answer Yes, plaintiff, F ‘ and he is +he at Vil Now, therefore, on motion of A. C. Payne, attorney for the is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Dave Mylstead > d th hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Nena Milsad, an the gerendat’ ” h o f : sonds of matrimony heretofore existing between theplaintiff and and they are hereby dissolved. bo action taxed by the Clerk, This 6th day of September, 1955. Kee ek kk ke ee eH USANA ~ — NORT 7 ai rT ED Lai my Gd CAROLINA CO STTD N THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesdav, September 6, 1955 - SEPTEMBER - 1955 , the defendant ntermarry, and are they the Complaint? eS on eonars . “ae - : lefendant separate and live separate and apar: lived separate and apart e Tror each other for me an" +} at + } 5 © ne Ot nis institution ar ie otate of North ent of this action? +s term of the tr Honor Hubert having answered the favor of the plaintiff and against the records. and adjudged by the Court that the ponds 0 ordered oraer ed, ; ‘ : ; ‘ Q : G P, Conee ine between the plaintiff, Sylvia Fern P. Cohee, Zussell Cohee, be and the same are dissolved, an absolute divorce from the defendant. Hubert E. Olive ———— Jud gre Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OND WEEK ------~~ AUGUST TERM, 1955 said Tuesday, September 6, 1955 CAROLINA COUR v 1REDELL COUNTY Ne exander Harding, Margaret Al Plaintiff, vs charles Ae Harding, - Defendant, Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as allered ae Answer YeSe Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff.and have thev and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged Answer YeSe 3, Has the plaintiff heen a resident of the State of than six months next preceding the filing of this Comp Answer YeS. Defendant, “8 cause coming am to be heard and being heard at wperior Court of —— : 1 rerior Vourt of Iredell Countv before His Honor, the ’ . the issu ‘tury havine answered al! plaintiff and against the defendant, th ob uo Ue 7 & record: ro 1s + rot Lf matrim vw ' therefore, ordered, adiudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimon heret of ; $ ; ; me ore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are ™* her ) $ 44 eby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby rranted an absolute qaqivorce ? , ror the defendant, ‘his the 6th day of September 1955. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesdav, September 6, 1955 8 Vorth Carolina In The Superi or Tredell Countv Delphine G. Webster vs Frank J. the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina six months next preceding the institution of this ton? 1 OF tH1S action? y ¥ e eSe the plaintiff defendant married as allesed in the complain:’ iff and defendant separated, and have they Lived separ: yore for two years next preceding the institution of this before H,anorable Superior Court, and being p Jury, the following issues wr the plaintiff heen a restient of the State of Ngrth Carolina for ine the institution of this action? ‘ int? defendant married as alleged in the compla: . ; : ara plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived s¢P and apart jon of this act Sly fortw vears next preceding the institut Tho oe - , J An nt answered all of said issues "Yes". t is, ther t the tent Tt is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged, and ddcreed tha of ? . j v a ’ he for- matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant ever di fron the ssolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce 4 vinculo aeTrenc t F inst jefendant, Frank n be taxed 488 Weahat " : £ ve We Steyr , and that the cos ,8 of this act1o ne plainti G erk aie This september, 1955. Hubert Es OLi¥euue Judge Presiding ft IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK AUGUST ERM, 1955 5 ly 4 5 - Tuesday, September 6, 19 A067 vorth carolina In The Superior Court tredell Conty javid Frank Hambright vs ee ee 88 #2 oe Kathleen Hambright 1 Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Caroli + rore than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: YeSe the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged sil Answer: Yes. 3, Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate i apart continvously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. orth Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County lavid Frank Hambricht vs Judgment lathleen Hambricht This cause comingm to be heard before Honorable Hubert E. Olive ‘residing over the Aucust Civil Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and rcard het : ? } J gE j P owing eard before said HSnorable Huhert Es Olive, a id a uryv, the followin ‘ere submitted to the Jurys l, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for 5 nore ¢} $ és - : : : 2 nin? - Wan six months next preceding the institution of this action: Wer : : . 7 5 +h com int? @. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complant: 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separ t . ; “ae ca cae 2 ate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution 0! ‘his action? 7” , "he Jury having answered all of the said issues "Yes". I¢:4 i ¥ : t bonds 8, therefore, by the Court ordered, atiudged, and decreed that the bon ° Natrimo ; fon b ny heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant oe *orey er di . i i ul ‘ Ssolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce 3 vinculo om the def is acti defn dant, Kathleen Hambright, and that the costs of this action be ; , axed avai wnst the plaintiff by the Clerk. The ¢ Sth day of September, 1955. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding kkk ke ek Ke Ke Kk Ke OK OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 ~ SECOND c IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 335 WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 North Carolina ) Hob C ¢ Ipedel! ) on THR SURE T Oe. Comes vogTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ounty OT redqei Ruby Cline Plaintiff CUE ee ee -vs- Cleve Cline bs. aie C Sa tamdank. soLON FAY HATHCOCK SLOOP, DEFENDANT, ! oa wo ! i anit i iil eis i wa 8 a wens Be Q <i palit ani aaeaninianat 7} Wer he vlai sFF > + $ . : l. Were the plainti and defendant married to each other as alleged in the 1, Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married to each other as . alleged in the complaint: Answer: Yes . " Answer: YeSe Has th >} intiff heen } 3 3 > J+ a+ h : ’ > ORT } y : 2. Has the plainti 2en a bona fide resident of the State of North Caroling 9. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for ; mont} immediately r edinge +} hring? f “ette. anand 5 ‘ a : or six months immediately preceding the bringing of this action? for more than six months next preceding the commencement of this action AwWwennr ?® Vv ~ ANSwer. ese Et eo as alleged in the complaint? - Have the plaintiff and defMdant lived separate and apart from each other Answer Yes. For two veare sw ; +olw yw Af yp hoa . $ 4 to Pp : wn $ . ’ " . + ar or two years immediatelv preceding the brimming of this action? 3, Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fron each 1 ~* Voc : . ee ff ¢hic wit se other for more than two years next preceding the commencement of tnis action as allered in the complaint’? M Answer: Ye IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. = - . fas \ war ee ORTH CAROLINA iaint Pi EES El || centers) 6% Sey ANAS hai SN eee ane axes n \ onisaal : —" ‘ BP lis Tae IREDELL CONTY — JUOGMENRT } DAV PRANY aTAND ct aire (*) ne \ “AL FRANK SLOOP , =— T a ; ‘ Plaintiff, Defendant. ) es -vs- this cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, sts 5 SOLON FAY HATHCOCK SLOOP, He. Olive, and a Jury, at the September Term, 1955, of Iredell County Defendant. eS eee eee 4 ) 1 Superior Court, the following issues were submitted to and found by the Jury: This cause coming a to be heard and being heard before the Ea 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged idge Presiding and a Jury at the September 1955 Term of the Superior Court of the Ceeebebens lredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been ine: tae P@sonally served with process and that this action is properly before the Cout, <. Has the plaintiff heen a bona fide resident of the State of Norti and the following issues having been submitted and answered by the Jury: Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action, 4 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married to each oLner, OF alleged in the Complaint? alveged in the complaint ? Answer: "Yes", ¢. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North ee 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from n more than six months next preceding the commencement of this oe a. and the alleged in the complaint? 3 ther for ne : : : j j Other for two vears next preceding the bringing of this actio ) each Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from eae mencement of this ac e774 t 4 : : filing of this complaint, as allaged in the Complaint? Answer: S ott tion Answer: "Yes", wm for more than two years next precedhg the com trorney grthe It Is THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, A 88 alleged in the complaint? trimony now y And the Plaintiff, ORDERED, CONSIDERED And ADJUDGED, phat the bonds of ma Jury having answered all of the said issues "Yes". sasolveds * existing between plaintiff and defendant be, and they are, hereby 4 that the plantiff be esranted an absolute divorce from the defendant. t0 IT o of thine’ IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff pay the cost be taxed by the Clerk. Statesville, N. C,. september 6th, 1955, Ko oe oe ek oe oe otek IN THE SUPERIOR COURT —_ SECOND WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT , © 106 WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 955 SECOND, WEEN Ay. September 6, 1958 + 2 tf TU We . : on motion of J¥hn Hugh Williams, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the Attorney for the Plains; It is, : . te ree . ’ : : ° ‘ is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintrer Ray Frank Slo ¢ matrimonyheret ofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant Op, ponds © ae a + } h Sal > h Tayt ita ° . + and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant hereby disolved and set aside hy the Court. and the Colon Pay be, and the same are Hathcock Sloop, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore exist; $ £ ‘i ae + ing between +, jaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. 3 fr +he t + bh + r ia plaintiff and the defmdant be and they are hereby dissolved, This September 6th, 1955. This 6th dav of September, 1955. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presidine at the Septemer 1955 Term of the Superior Coym « Iredell County, vourt of ae arate OF NORTH CAROLINA / —~——~ -#EOSS COUNTY OF IREDELL North Carolina In the Superior Court ’ P —_—— vargaret McGhee Plaintiff . Iredell County. | st Term, 1955 Vera Stikleather heed L riain jilliam Russell McGhee Defendant. eee ee ee Issues . : 1, Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as allegec leather, Defendant C int’ Defendant. complaint? Jid the plaintiff and defendant marry } ler, and are they now Answer: Yes, 9 alleged in the complaint? 2« Has the plaintiff been a hona fide resident of th Answer: Yes ° for six months immediately preceding the bringin: Did the plaintiff and defendant seperate from each other, and have Answer: Yes, ived seperate and apart from each other continuously for more thantw 4 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each ot! prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in tie ‘or two vears immediately preceding the bringing of this action? answers Yes, ‘ Pe a rm \] h STATS , plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North SATE OPNORTH CAROLINA iw for moe tha six months next prior to the institution of this acti, OUNTY OF IREDELL in the complaint? argaret McGhee i Plaintiff es. “VS- Wey. “liam Russell McGhee i) Superior Court, Defendant. ) * North Carolina, i Reece Ths +6 HO Tredell County. Term, 1955. ‘his cause comine on to be heard, and being heard before his paves Vera otikleather, — Hubert Be 1955, of Iredell Plaintiff, Olive, and a Jury, at the September Term, county § , found by the Vs * “Uperior Court, the following issues were submitted to and f Jurys Stikleather, } Defendant. j “e | : +h "ere the plaintire and defendant married to each other, as alleged in _ waa as f the “onplaing? This cause emine on to be heard and being heard at this Term 0 nt? Hubert Answers Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, "Yes", yes 2 er \1 4 hide I : ° the iss! ‘e Has : 2 N rolina He Olive, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the plaintirr been a bona fide resident of the State © North Ca months next as alleged in the “mplaint? fenda” for 3 a : t the de Six ; submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and agains preceding the brindgng of this action, as set out in the record: Answe were oe Yes", IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK’ -------- AGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart ra] ‘TOM each other for two vears next preceding the bringing of this action, and the filing or ed 5 Ol thi. Complaint, as alleged in the Complaint? a vw Answer: "Yes", IT IS, THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for +h, oe Vile plaintiff, ORDERED, CONSIDERED and ADJUDGED, that the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved; thatthe plaintiff have the custodv d the two children born of saiq Now tn he rr cust ( r ¢ 4 $ ™ e ATS 2 is _ j now in her custody as alleged in the Complaint; that defendant pay, or make an allotrent to plaintiff of the sum of $127.50 per month out of his pay f his p in the Armed Forces of the United States of America, for the said two minor children, as alleged in the Complaint, and that is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, ORDERED, that the plaintiff pay the costs of this actioz, to be taxed by the Clerk. Hubert E, Olive - —: Presiding Judge, otates\ ills ’ > a é Sept >m} »Y th, 1955. akan #6021 orth Carolina In the Superior Court redell County August Term, 1955 Yamuel Edgar Kennerly ) lair te ) \ } ‘ \ / ‘ j } lamie Burrell Kennerlvy ) Defendant . es 7 i ee i 3 . : laint? Were the plaintif* and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the comp Answer: Yes, I] +) : : on for ‘aS the plaintiff heen a hona fide resident of the State ¢ North Carolina re than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes other for Ha > $ : Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes, North SECOND WEEK Tuesday, Carolina tredell County Mamie g, Olive, court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Cou vue v . Kennerly Plaintiff vs Burrell Kennerlv Defendant eee ee ee This cause coming on IN THE SUPERIOR COURT e-e----- AUGUST TERM, 1955 September 6, 1955 to ke heard and being heard hefore H Judge Presiding, and a jury at the August Term, 1955, 339 In the Superior Court August Term, 1955 Judgement is Honor, Hubert of the Superior nf , rt that defendant has been } nersonally served with process, and the following issues havine been submitted +o and answered by the Jury: 1, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully the complaint ? Carolina for more than six months next preceding the Answer: "Yes." 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resid married as alleged in A Answer; "Yes." 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each cther for two years next preceding the bringing of this action: samuel Edgar Kennerly he ‘efendant, Mamie Burrell Answer: "Yes," :fr Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintitl, and he is hereby granted an absolite d ivorce from the I Sane g és SmANtT syrat far 3 ting Kennerly and the bonds of matrimony heretorore exis ‘ hots . > is oe ake ‘ween the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. j : : + £ +h ection t And it further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to *e taxed by the Clerk, This 6th dav of September, 1955. % 4% + » % Hubert Judge SS fe ccomun pil THE SUPERIOR couRT | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 341 SECOND WEEK -------~ AUGUST TERM, 1955 scoND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 'nesdav, September 6, 1955 5 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 #6013 , STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN x ‘ ) IN THE SUPERIOR cour, ‘cng OF NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ) R sgiNTY OF IREDELL Mary Eunice Frady Famineits sy THE MATTER OF: via Se { oe az 2°8 U 2S, John We uray } Se Box 27 ; oa - ae ed ! Carolina ' David Lawrence Frady ) yooresville, Norte oe \ Defendant. ) 5, Se NOs @hdeO/ =U ' tel ° ° oon ny { 1. Were the plaintiff and defen t marri + rove Motor Company : 2 plain Y efendant married to each other, as alleged in the vooresville, North Carolina a ™ Comptaint? 7TH Z ™ ' 7, 4, Tucker, Inc. ‘ DG : Answer Yes 38) Center Street ve wei nee jutland, Vermont | Commission Docket No. 2433 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina and ' Fay +4 months Im as = r \ $ In g . . pe = “ ss i or six months immediately preceding the bringing of this action? Sroloyment Security Commission ’ aa of Nrth Carolina 4 hi Answe Se raleigh, North Carolina ! 2 ave +h ry] Sunt FH na afana + 4 ay . Ye ‘ ° . ts ’ rY y ° AVE e plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor Hubert HE. Olive, Judge Far +1 years Smmoadic Tap 7 : " s $ “a ° ¢ mee i 5 obi a > 2 o wo years immediateiv peceding the bringing of this action? Presiding at the August Term, 1955, of the Superior Court of Iredell Coun 1por fhnawor Vac 7 nr : : . * 7 ; } BUGWSS ACOs an appeal by John W. Gray, Claimant in the ahbove-entitled matter, under date of nly 16, 1955, such appeal having been taken from a decision of the Employment veNT AAT TT. \ ar rT mmr \T JLiA A VUT VANUOLI A } rT 2TIPRR TOR CORT spupt+ n : i aT * 3 y ino «+ P ~ ; P ; = sh sik CO vo OR TReNPTT \ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. security Commission of North Carolina rendered June 27, 1955, Decision No. 2133, 4 4 u OY Cod do a ] ann +} 5 . : ° - a and the Court havne examined the evidence set out in the record on appeal fror : Frady, Pb f ( ( said Commission and heine of the opinion that the said Decision No. 2433 is ° ( D1) On o£. , a ae ae ee. ee ee: cnnare \ } “ } David I ; supported by competent. and substantial evidence, and being further of the Vavid Lawrence Frady, Defendant. ( Phie @auae canie , : pinion that such decision is in conformity with the General Statutes of Nortr i$ cause coming on to he heard, and beim heard before his Honor, Judge futer ; arn) ine BE. Olive . 4ro.ina and that the same should he affirmed: E. Olive, and a Jury, at the September Term, 1955, of Iredell County Superior . : Tt 4 + e : : . } e Sauve. Mie eae ‘tis, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the decision of th ommissior vourt, the following issues were submitted to and found by the Jury. Yo. 2139 + «433 be and the same is hereby affirmed in all respects. It is further + tne l. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in rdere t a“ i » at n 2 + } 2Aat n ee d that the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina pay the cos» vOmplaint . P ‘his action, Answer. "Yest ’ eS Dene at St ; sane ® at Statesville, North Caroli this the éth dav of September, 1955. a : oo ) # ins ille, North Carolina, is h vepten , «+ has the plaintiff heen a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolin for six n a +3 . q ir Hubert E. Olive /Or Six months immediately preceding the bringing of this action, as allege Judge Presiding Aneawe " - Answer, "Yes", \ 3 He > r) s : o - lave the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from this and the filing of each other p (or two years next in ‘ ; { i years next preceding the bringing of this action, Cam +n+ . Complaint, as alleged in the Complaint? T IS. THEREFORE , for the IT IS, THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney r ‘ . “\ — ia nine now plaintiff, ORDERED, CONSIDERED and ADJUDGED, that the bonds of matrimnl bait chy existing between the plantiff and the defendant be, and the a#me are, here”? dissolved, and that the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divoreee “a ae on IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that theplaintiff pay the costs of this — to be taxed by the Clerk, Hubert. Be. residing Statesville, N. C, Septmber 6th, 1955, Kok wk x me mk oe ke ke oe me PRT N THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 #6100 NORTH CAROLINA | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Judy Parker, a minor, by her next friend, Walter Parker, Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs we Alston Davidson Defendant ee ee eee cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor ’ live, Judge Presiding at the August term, 1955, cf the Iredel) ’ 0 Court and it appearing to the Court that this is an actior, : } Parker, a minor, by her next friend, Walter Parker, against 7 Alston Davidson alleting certain injuries suffered by the minor out growth of an accident with a truck driven by the defen- Fehruary, 1955. And it further appearing to the inor Judy Parker, suffered som iniuries as a result court that ths iahbilityv of the defendant , he iniuries to the iff are not of a ious permanent nature and that the plaintiff and the defendan: consent have agreed upon a settlement of all lifferences hetween them for the sum of $1,000.00. And the court is fair and reasonable and for the inds that the said settlement interest of the minor plaintiff. It is therefcre, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff it te sum of $1,000.00 in full and complete settlement damages suffered by the said plaintiff. That the defendant 1 to the office of the Clerk of guperior Court of ~~ ; ? y as said Clerk of the said court disburse the said money gi ke oo fe a ah © the o Baxter H. Finch, attorney for the plaintif?s $132.00 t ¢ a eu - $ the $2! Tor medical bill and that the remainder be retained by * : : ‘ aw and for benefits of the minor plaintiff as provided for by } that tho own 9 r , j ha ne defemant pay the costs of this action. Hubert E. Olive inn Presiding Judge Consent: Baxter H.Finch Re + Pons “4 + raxter H. Finch, attorney for VrlaintifT li allie eae LAND, SOWERS & AVERY ¥ iol bY. Neil S. Sowers Attorneas for De fendant, + Ai IN THE SUPERIOR COURT m D WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM 1955 — Tuesday, September6, 1955 R #101 “gt CAROLINA sREDBLL COUNTY pavid Parker, @ minor, by his 1 er next friend, ea ectet VS» ws)}jam Alston Davidson oo Defendant ; This cause coming on to be heard and heing heard Judge Presiding at the August term, Sounty Superior Court and it appearing to the court n -rought by David Parker, a minor, by his next fiend 4liiam Alston Davidson alleging certain injuries s lainff as the out zrowth of an accident he llth day of February, 195 And the plaintiff, minor, David Parker, suffere said accident. ’ it further appearing to the cour uestionable and that the zhhy s permanent. or serious permanent nature and through their counsel, by consent have agreed ann ! : and differences between them "Inds that the sa 2 ie Said settlement the minor plaintiff ‘ . | It is therefore ofered, adjuda@ed, and decreed that the pl aint ;f * th ° . ws ant. of a1) ne defendant the sum of $750.00 in full and complete settlement of aii } tne ‘urles and damaces suffered by the said plaintiff. That the defendant pay 4 7 . > ie Caunty and that into the offte of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County and tha . p ' : . : c llows: Clerk of the said court disburse the said money as follows: $100.00 to $307.00 for medical Baxter H. Finch, attorney for plaintiff, hi?) lll ¢ oe ; : becca aed coe eC wi 6 © Davis Hospital and that the remainder be retained by the said clerk to Se e se 10r 5 ' . } : that the benefits of the minor plaintiff as provided for by law and tha e hefena ndant ‘ . Pay the costs of this action. "0, SOWERS g AVERY 7 Nei} Ate 3. Sowers orneys for Derendant Moe ok oe me ke ke Ke Om me me x IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COURT 3495 T Tv r . mT) v0 4 4 4 Eee er acer 1985 eEcOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 sdav, September 6, 1955 Pyesday, September 6, 15 o nm CAROLINA aca ie is IN THE SUPERIOR COURT cnt! N THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY R COUR ospsLL CONT ewis, Administratrix of the ) ‘ : of B. Lewin; aries Be Payne, Infant vy _ Plaintiff ) vrrough wiemere Lriend, Le Fe rant, SF Plaintiff Se ) JUDCMENT ee } ) a we A ee D i eavis, ) VSe \ Se ae oe Defendant } “ , W. Massey, and Wayne ) This cause coming m to be heard and hbehg rd by his Hen Nas i f nda one heard by his nonor, Hubert ’ Defendants. ! 7 live TiiAco Preasiding + it a 3 4 rn : ee is te Wa v AOE rresiain a the Iredel County i‘ . ee ie deat ; : , + vounty superior Court, August tern, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor 55 and it appearing to the court from the statement of Cor ; se P a = pe ey OF OU vert B. Olive, Judge Presiding, at the September 1955 Term of the Superior A matters set out in the pleadings filed in this ec a ; i 3 2 in this ause have een agreed upon fourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Benet from the statement. of BR . 7 . ial nv tne parties ar 1 +ha+ thea Aafand nf h parties and that the defendant has agreed t to th nei : | rae ” has azreed to pay to the plaintiff and counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the pleadings have heen agreed ij 74 . 4 ° ° e i the plaintiff has agreed to accept the su 6.86 9080. OO. 4n- fuld ; : bid r aU’ rY the sum oO! pe, 300.0 LI uss accord and Dor by the parties, ar qd that the defendants have arreed - pay - ss a“ int . rf { i , . : i i and the plaintiff, through his next fr end, has acreed to accept the sum of Four ‘| bit NOW, THEFT EFORE hey consent it is ordered ad ‘udeed oe et de i 2 Y mse 4 e sASs 1 & 124 <a ~. by a ’ eve Fe oe dered, adjudged and decreed that nousand One Hundred Eighty-four and 3/100 ($4,184.30) Dollars and the costs of Bet ee . pes : i) \ i ° ‘AR | tha pla int £4 have and recover of tho defer dant at enum af #9 3200 00 sais 3 thie eae . e ‘ e e . an a a £,30U.UU anc his action in full accord and satisfaction tnereof; Hy tit ie ear ae ia : eae tay la ne costs oO ry e get ‘14 Yn he eaac : Pawnrs A : ‘ ° . petal ae on be assessed against the defendant to be taxed And it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is a minor under Mal a er bh HM Oy tne Vier tho o ou ( ' ' ’ 1.4 : — 1 Hh F age of twenty-one (21) years; and that the plaintiff has n fully and al the &t f } 1OK«4 eit), AT n+ om ‘ £ en a a i a ay or veptemoer, 4 De perly represented in said action by a duly qual ed next friend; baiah + BR ( tu t ; n+ : 7 na ‘ ° Hubert Ee ston And it further appearing that the defendant, Wayne Massey, is a minor under Presiding Judge the ag. - y 1 74 Cor te ‘age of twenty-one (21) years; and that he has been fully and properly represented O : n this +4 h Re cae 2 ° $ . . ‘ : are ree action by a duly qualified Guardian Ad Litem; ie He € r Ax r . RF noh e Ae Hedrick Attorney for } inet oe And 4+ #1, } . . : : axt i a " : — nee And it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff incurred medical = ‘xdenseg f + ‘ : : Ls +A LAND, S( VERY penses for treatment of the injuries which he sustained in an automobile accident 2 ad 4 t J : "on Which this cause of : : dical exp es have not been eil S. Sowers iS cause of actim arose; that said medical expenses have no een vy v vel oS At fds and th Attorney for Defen + t , : ,er 3 efendant at the persons and the amounts owed by the plantiff therefor, are as dLlows: kok mk mk me Doctor Weslev C. Palmes, Jr. - $255.00, Iredell Memorial Hospital - 15,80 , ‘ » and the Nscholson Funeral Home - $12.50; And it furth ne : ‘ : » oh ‘urther appearing tat Attorney R. A. Hedrick has represented the intiff and h4 iT an ; dhis next friend and endered valuable legal services Yr O$ec) e 1+ 4 “4410n of t , junacn . ‘ t the plaintiff's cause of action herein; NOW REREAD PD eae | » THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Paints iff h ; 7 ave and recover of the defendants the sum of Four Thousand One Hundred “Bhtyefo i - ur and 30/100($4,184.30) ?Dollars; said sum to be paid into the office j the C] { : he *rk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and to be disbursed by said ““°TK ag follows: ital * $416.80 ’ To Doctor Wesley C. Palmes, Jr. - $255.00, to Iredell Memorial to Nicholson Funeral Home - $12.50, and to Attorney Re , that the OA: ‘Ck, for ; ; his services as Attorney for the plaintiff, $1,0466753 “ainhe ba ‘ ance of $2,453.25 Dollars be held by the said Clerk for the use and "efit, of » *he plaintire according to the laws made and provided therefor, or that aid C] erk Pay over to plaintiff all or *Y Dare 8 the duly qualified General Guardian of the of Said sum, s as is in accordance in such manne r and under such condition 4 | } | | i ii pill i Se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955" ~*~ with the laws made and provided therefor: and that the cost S Of this ACtion be taxed by the Clerk against the de€éndants. his 6th day of September, 1955. Hubert Ec. Olive Judge Presj iding Sea ; » A. Hedrick Re A. Hedrick, Attorney for the ‘red G. Chamblee tT! } mY n 4 Fred G. Chamblee, Attorney for t Defendants. Sp 375] NOE SOL TNA mae ener « JANOL J Lin ne OUPER IC COURT + EDELL CC Vv ATTATTAM mm "KF 4 4 A rFUQ1 he 4 5 - wv { a a+ IA! e VUStwal ar fle, R 1b r Ostwalt, et a] ’ rat + oners c ’ Se JDGM T ‘eo z le . saither Ostwalt and wife, Lev . *. Ostwalt, et a] 2spondents Ss amie en : ie a } : } } } ; ‘S Cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under signed udgre PraciaAt« yr at tha A rat + QOcer t A Cc ; j rresiding a ne Augus erm 1955, Iredell Superior Court, upon the -Sponcents from the order of the Clerk of Superior Court confirmin: } report of commissioners: It appearing to the court from the testimony of Witnesses and arcvument of co insel that the report of commissioners should in alt respect S e approv re >q ana conf irmed with ne exception to which parties to this art? Ae ei oe ed : 7 al mr mvs action have consented and agreed to through their counsel in open cour In nN the Bore $ por ne ¥Yoregoing, ‘9, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the ro yr + fF for Saacin 2a 5 ’ i o+ commissioners and order of the 6lerk of Superior Court confirming Same he and t¢ S e { 3a 0€, and the same is herehv aby, approved with the following modificatio 0 a) See ee ee ee sai s : : wn 60 ye es consent § he commissioners are hereby directed to retu ro : ne premis es seer i mre © ~ e 'seS, secure a bulldozer and construct a ford across a creek on th far Lata an 4 4 “ P ) and +0! between lot no. # and lot no. 9, said ford to he used by the benefit of nefit of the owners of lot no. 8 and lot no. 9. The costs of the s?® construction of this etion ‘S$ ford shall be taxed as a part of the cost of this 4 This the 6th da: his the 6th day of September, 1955. 4 Hubert Be OLS VO eee Judge Presiding BY CONSENT: Je Gy Lewis Attorney for Petitj oners Land, Soers & Avery __ Trivette, Holshouser & Mit ch Attorneys for Respondents ans "5 eeeaeeknenn ene 2 Oe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 347 ND WEEK ---------~- AUGUST TERM, 1955 mee Tuesday, September 6, 1955 7 he CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 3 TRIICAT NOT ere TReDELL COUNTY AUGUST BRM, 195 If ; ; | y ith, Infant by an : ay ee next frend, H. E. Dye, ) 0 Plaintiffs, ) JUDGME Vs.. | tres 91 nd Ruby Sipes ae ee Defendants. ) This cause coming on to be heard at the August 1955, term of the Iredell ; he Hi } - Hut ie Olive Judge Presid = ‘ounty Superior Court, ! efore His Honor Hubert E. Oliv: ize Presiding, and ning heard by consent of the parties:without a jury: that the cause was heard yon statements of counsel for both parties and evidence submitted to the Court ya licensed physician, from which it appears to the Court that the minor } lve Smith, fifteen vears of age, by her next friend, H. &. Dye, her instituted this action to recover damages which she sustained because of injuries : $3 $ 1)+ hi hKaloangcing + h dafandante received by her while she was riding in an automobile, belonging to the defendants n 3 " Ty a 19o6°C Carolina on June ll, 1955, and driven by James Sipes in Iredell County, North over turneds; and it appearing to the Court that the plantiff and defendants have agreed upon a settlement of all matters and things growing out of the alleged niuries set forth in the Plaintiff's complaint, by the terms of which the lefendants have agreed to pay the sum of Four Thousand Dollars (2h ,00( together with the ‘ull and complete settlement of the minor's alleged injuries, Ana+ st of this action. : : i ae : Anet tanita eS The Court having carefully examined the evidence in this case, particuiarty ++ ‘ne evidence of the physician, under whose care the minor was treated; 4nd } made to appear to the Court that the parents of the child are entirely ‘atisfied with the settlement and that Dr. Charles Field, a practicing physician who treated { ¢ 1 . . lars Q he staff of the North Carolina Baptist Hospital at Winston Salen ’ ner ; . ° 7 + 6 r vv nsi orir 7 + '$ Of the opinion that the minor has made excellent recovery, considering ne rt * > ftoyr ft) ~ Serious extent and nature of the injutes which she sustained: that arter 11 inquiry 4 : vty into the matter, the Court enters the following decree: : s the sum of Four Thousand That the Plaintiff recover of the Defendants “— ($4,000.00) , to be taxed by the together with the cost of this action vier > . ty to be Paid hy the defendants into the office of the Clerk of the Superior OUrt of Iredel] County, 2, North Carolina. That Out of the finds paid to him, the Clerk shall pay to the North “anol ars T s ‘na Baptist Hospital for hospital services, the sum of Nine Hundred Dollar Se Venty. the sum of One Five Cents ($000.75); to the minor's father, H. &. Dye, fi Hunde Minety-Ei eht Dollars Seventy-Nine Cents ($198. 79) to reimburse loga] Py aah vices and the Iredell him for the including Dr. John Stegall for doctor's ser * Hospital, where she was first taken after the injuries; to the minor —_ ices "+R. A. Hedrick and Baxter H. Finch, the sum of $1,000.00 for oo: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ~--------- AUGUST TER a : “sens 9 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 » 1955 in connection with the representation of the minor in this action, and » 4nd the iy +o he paid to the dian of the minor f r balance to be paid to the guardian E minor for hey é . 1Se@ and benefit as provided by U lem het + : settlement between the parties, entered by consent » and urt, is not unreasonable or unjust to the minor Plaintirr MOVE. , interest, under the circumstances and nature of the dies Signed and entered in the ofice of the Clerk of Superior Court of Tr >) . wtew IN 1+ y+ eiui - \] +h 3 Q a m Iredell County in Statesville, Narth Carolina on September ‘th, 1055, Way} py : ame tubert_E, Olive hudvert E, Olive, Judge Presidvs ] Na me e fe VYEarman 7 C. H. Dearman of the firm of Adams, f oa ‘ Jearman & Winberry, Attorneys for Naf Ia vetTendaants Defendant $6 fa) : : the is cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Hubert Olive 4 August 7 10cc SUS i rm, 4 5 T 4 . 2 : ‘ e Cour , Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to th ha : : : . 2 fant that this action is for injuries suffered by Bettie Sue Harding, an intam Ps go i \ i acture t¢ ‘ifteen (15) years of ase, and that her iniuries mainly consist of a fr he j | erly ge the right leg and extensive hospitalization in order to correct and prop the bone for its future erowth: It furth ; h the her appears from the investigation made by the Court wit Plain ; orney Plaintiff's personal physician and from a letter to the Plaintiff's Att , | by the rom Dr. Carr, a specialist of Charlotte, that the injuries suffered bY A a no Plaintiff have healed and that the prospects are good thet sne will have furt ; ih rther disturbance by reason of the injuries suffered. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COND WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 g Tyesday, September 6, 1955 nsel >. + Plaintiff hima n It further appears to the Court that Plaintiff, through her Coun , the Defendant, through Counsel, have agreed to a sttlement wherein the ni ang } gant will pay or has paid to or for the Plaintiff the Defenda “uiSAtID NINE HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100 DOLLARS (41 ,950.0C sc1fN HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($700.00) has heen paid sed by the mother in providing care, medical and hospit institution of this action, and that the settlement now to ditional FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS (% 1 nr ronefit of the Plaintiff and such expenses as the Con allotment in this order. After an investigation of the facts and circumstances in connection the action and after examining the Plaintiff and her physician and the le tr. Carr, a Specialist, the Court finds as a fact that tl sayment of an addtional $4,250.00 is fair and reasonable, f the minor Plaintiff that the said settlerent approved. The Court further finds that there is now an ovtstandi hill unpaid in aldition to those already paid by the mother which should he paid, as follows: Dr. C. R. Carr - Miller Clinic -- Davis Hospital The Court finds further that R. A. Hedrick as Counsel "a8 rendered valuable services in obtaining this settlement ‘nd that he should he paid a fee of $1,237.50 out of said Services, It is, therefore, ORDSRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff recover * the Defendant, in addition » the monev already paid to the mother and her fer T benefit, the sum of $1,250.00. Upon payment into the Court of this amount of “ey and the cost of the action by the Defendant, the Defendant shall be “ompletely discharced of any and all other further liability past, peaqet TosPective suffered by the Plaintiff as a result of the injuries received by "er ag alleged in the Complaint. Upon Payment of the aforesaid funds into the Court, the Clerk of this ai directed to pay a f 7 Hedrick for his services fee of $1,237.50 to R. A. Hear and he j ne ig : i : . ; nnection directed to pay the following bill which was incurred in co With ¢ he treatment of the injuries suffered by the Plaintiff. D ~ c. R, Carr, Miller Clinic ee ee eee $100.00 L6.00 September, 19556 Vavis Hospital Hubert. BE. Olive Presiding Judge R tt lie 2 Xe eh ee * 2 ee Oe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Tuesday, September 6, 1955 Thi Ho I b e Cour t akes a ] ec¢ ss unt i Wed e Mo in iInis no at 1 2 n esdav aa ro £, September ’ 1955 at 93:30 ofclock A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WBBK --------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Wednesday, September 7, 1955 IN THE MATTER OF: MRS. MARTHA ELIZABETH WEAVER, Incompetent Jury sworn and impanelled as follows: Je R. Morris C. B. Moore Wade A. Morrow Joseph C Morrison » oe ~HecW. Sloop — C. W. Mooney Nathan Lverly Clyde R. Moose Iva Lee Campbell Emory R. Summers Rk. KH. Compton V. T. Menscer Pending trial the Court takes a recess until Thursday morning. Q is H mber °» This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thumday Morning, Septe 1955 at 9330 o'clock A, MM, sigh 5 6 arnt Saneon IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 351 SECOND WEEK ---------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Thusday, September 8, 1955 JAY) CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM 1955 REDELL COUNTY chomas He Anderson, Thomas Plaintiff } -vS- ney of Statesville, } , municipal corporation Defendant. } This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Presiding Judge a the August Term 1955, Iredell Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court hat this ig an action instituted by the Plaintiff against the Defendant for the purpose of enjoining the Defendant from the enforcement of an order of the ilding Inspector relating to property owned hy the Plaintiff. It further appears to the Court that the Attorneys representing the parties to the action have agreed that the restraining order heretofore issued should be a continued insofar as it applies to the enforcement of the order heretofore issued ty the Building Inspector, but that in order for the richts and controversies hetween the parties to be finally determined, the matter should be referred back to the Building Inspector for further hearings end proper findings of facts and any orders that mht be issued bv the Building Inspector as a result of any future ‘earings and findings of fact by him, and that a minimum of time should be taken ‘y the Building Inspector and that such action should be taken within the time erescribed by the Court NGG. D2 inG& VOu!l Ufle oO It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DE roctw : : \ 5 “straining order hertofore issued in this cause, be, and the same is hereby 4 4 , ‘ntinued insofar as this restraining order applies to the enforcement of an order the Builds ' he Building Inspector heretofore entered in this matter. In order to complete the record andproperly bring the matter before the Ourt, e : - : ‘Or any future action by the Court, the cause is remanded to the Building Ing Metor for such action as he may take in relation to the enforcement of the Ines Wit H : i me . Cusing Act or any laws of the City of Statesville as it applies to the wal ‘1aint f ifft ns 8 property and by agreement it is directed that the Uity shall take such act} a: ° j nd ‘on and have such hearings to enforce the action as it may be advised a "Ot lat *r than the 28 day of September, 1955. R ‘ ‘ da “xce ‘ i ; n is remande Pt as to the restraining order, which is continued, the act1o “0 the B ‘ “uilding Inspector as herein provided, and the City is taxed with the cost this actin, Hubert_E. Olive Judge Presiding eek ke Ke ek we we we OR OK ‘tte IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------~ AUGUST TERM, 1955 Thursday, September &, 1955 . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM , 1955 oa Thursday, September 8, 1955 ‘#6132 North Caplina, | In the Superior Court ’ / A5950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Iredell County. | August Term, 1955, vORTH SAROLINA SUPERIOR COUR’ Ruth W. Jolly ] TREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 19 Vs. 1 ORDER 1, Cy MOORS, ati ft . -vs- 7” wt l ¥ hei } . * be heard and being heard before His Honor, i, . his Ause mine t nis cause comin ; Mm oO 2rown Paving Company, iihertr fF. 014 ue oe me ee ge ; : : 4 ¢ tion Hubert E, Olive, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that Klexang a corpora Defendant * a der ee fg fo +h : ar Can “xr 4 whic . + + + 2 : * . : A Amer is the proper County in which to try this cause, the plaintiff and defendant This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of SCOTT, COLLIER and hnet heainge [+43n a ar + Ct) a Cc } . Ff i C both being citizens and residents of Alexander County: "sh. attorneys for defendant, Brown Paving Company, to amend its answer ‘ bby ? - s y zi It is, therefore, on motion of the defendant, ordered and adiudged by the this action, and it appearing t the court that said motion should he allowed; Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby removed to Alexander County It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, in the discretion of yiperior Cont nd + Clark f thi Comrt ; rah as + : ra) } ; he - : : superior Cont, and the Clerk of this Court is hereby directed to forthwith the Cont, that the Defendant be, and is, hereby permitted to amend its answer send a1} ner a Conse cee rk GQ $ ’ : f } r ; } 1a j } P wast (}5 s all papers in this Couse to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Alexander to the complaint of the Plaintiff and is allowed a period of Fifteen (15) days rounty} to he placed on the docket of said Alexander Superior Court. from the date of this order in which to file said amended answer A motion having been made for temporary subsistence of the Children of This &th day of September, 1955 and defendant, said motion is continued to.he heard at the next Hubert E, Olive AC05L Hubert E. Olive | (ORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Judge Presiding IREDELL COUNTY SEPTEMBER TERM, 1955 Ma STL VAR ed IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OUNTY CAROLYN CHARLENE YORK AND 40GVUEBLL , Y TrlrTrram 2D \é f WAt wan ir . a AUGU i TERM 1955 KATHY MAY 1Urth ° Infants This cause comin ¢ on to be heard before the undersigned Judge presidin eNAli dda LU c Saal Ls i il i at th ’ ’ ~ ‘. IOC Bh as eae wiry . he Court the August Term Iredell Superior Court, 1955, and it appearing to the voury ‘ that + $a8 . . .- D : ' : 36 nat the Petitioner in this cause does not desire to pl rsue nis ace rown Aavinge Comyn <: He - i 4 Jing vor pany, sie rOrnnrat+ 4 . es fy) +h + .47 ia Def Mier, and by consent of Counsel for Petitioner and Respondents a judgment Defendant * } ve of Mn-suit is to he : : Saceds im NAST lS to be t + dism ed SCOTT, COLLIER AND ss" entered and the action dismissed; 1 of OY Ls 3 oO nine oa coal wets “128 cause coming on to be heard upon the mot ‘ ; IPDOTAnD re — “ ~ _ £ } $ mi i % 1e Neat in this actio’ IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND DECREED that the action be dismissed and th Defendant, Brown Paving Company to amend its answer in thi tit ik loner taxed with the cost. appearing to the Court that said motion should be allowed} ia: thoes ™ ; ton of the Hubert 2. Olive ~ 18, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in the discretion Judge Presiding. + A + hat + +) 2 es ; : . at the Defendant be, and is, hereby permitted to amend 1ts answe ok ke de oe ke ok ok ke ke ke from the comnlain+ 7 : aa r ays ++ ne complaint of the Plsintiff and is allowed a period of Fifteen (15) day th ro ef * . i ne date of his order in which to file said amended answer. This &th Hubert E. Olive residing Judge * , C n dav of Sepember, 1955 bg “se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM » 1955 Thursday, September 8, 1955 wapsey, NORTH CAROLINA { IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ) August - September IREDELL COUNTY Term - 1956 City of Statesville, a municipal corporation Plaintiff -VS- Thomas H. Anderson, Defendant } (his cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the regular Aucust Jontemhe QOgs e G $ x September, 1955, term of the Superior Court of iredell County, before His Honor Hubert E. Olive, Judge presidnez, upon the plaintiff's motion to amend its petition, and the Court having heard the argument of counsel for both the plaintiff and the defendant in the exercise of its sound le-zal discretion hereby permits and allows the plaintiff's motion to amend its petition and the plaintiff is civen until the 8th day of October, 1955, in which to file an amended petition, and the defendant is given thirty (30) days after the filing of plaintiff's amended petition in which to file his amended answer. ‘his &th day of September, 1955. Hubert E. Olive Judge presiding -vs- a Sarah Beattv Fox, Defendant Jury sworn and impanelled as follows: L. Swann Ww. F. Burgess tT H. MeJunkin Grady S. Knox A. Stewart G. B. Parlier B. Orren R. W. Cody P, Vinson Fred W. Ramsey Holland C. Reid J. R. Redmond IN THE SUPERIOR ater WEEK ---------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 We vhureday: September 8, 1955 1 TUR CIprrtarg cenorom CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT #6024 yORTH August - September 12SDBLL COUNTY Term - 1955 t Fox imest te’ Plaintiff -vS- sarah Beatty Fox, “7 Defendant { This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by by the Honorable iubert & Olive, Judge presiding, at the regular August-September, 1955 term, ofthe Superior Court & Iredell County, upon an appeal from the order of the ‘lerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County from the plaintiff's motion to strike certain portions of the defendant's answer as appears in the record, and it appearing to the Court, and the Court finding that the ruling and order of the Clerk of the Superior Court in allowing the plaintiff's motion to strike was in all respects propers$ It is, therefore, considered, ordered, adjudzed and decreed, that the ruling and order of the Clerk in respect to the motion to strike be and the same ig hereby approved and affirmed. This &th day of September, 1955. Olive Presiding \URTH CAROLINA & SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ‘rnest, Fox, Plaintiff Sarah Beatty Fox, Defendant i : ! ! 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER : Yes, ¢. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North aro) ; ' "a for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: 3 Yes, Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from fach 0 ther for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? 4, Yes, Did the Plaintiff wrongfully abandon the defendant as alleged by the flat “ele Ndant in her answer? ANSWER : No ‘ ee SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM t Thursday, September 8, 1955 a NORTH CAROLINA IN THE § IREDELL COUNTY UPERIOR CouRT Ernest Fox, } Plaintiff } ¥S ; JUROGMENT Sarah Beatty Fox, Defendant } This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor ’ Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding and a jury at the September 1955 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has heen properly se 5 j properly served personally with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury? 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged o in the complaint? ANSWER: "Yes", 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six mnths next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: "Yes", 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: "Yes", Lie Di i the plaintiff wronefully abandon the defendant as alleged by the defendant in her answer? ANSWER: "No", NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, “rnest Fox, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, sarah Beatty Fox, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this actia to be taxed by the Clerk. [his &th day of September, 1955. _Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding Ke KK Kw ek ee ke me ee OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 307 COND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1955 Thursday, September 8, 1955 a7h aie iinentn: allie Ae CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT seapaLL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1955 1y THE MATTER OF: yp3. MARTHA ELIZABETH WEAVER, é Incompetent Is the petitioner, Martha Elizabeth Weaver, now sane, and of sound mind and memory, and competent to manageher own affairs’ ANSWER; No. ORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT [RSDELL COUNTY In the matter of the competency of Yartha Elizabeth Weaver, Petitioner VS. Jd UDG BK ‘leil 5. Sowers, Guardian, Respondent This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor Hubert i, Olive, Judge Presiding and a jury at the August 1955 Term o° Superior Court t o Iredell County and being heard upon the petition filed by the petitioner and on appeal from the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina and being heard and the jury having answered the issue submitted to them as follows: Is the petitioner, Martha Elizabeth Weaver, now sane, and of sound mind and mem ‘ ‘ d memory and competent to manage her own affairs? Answers No, NOW THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said Martha , tlig e - ee wr) abeth Weaver is incompetent from want of understanding to manage her own afta; 4 ; ‘ {Irs by reason of mental and physical weakness on account of age and desease, and ¢ ; t , , hat the appointment of a Guardian by the Clerk of Superior Court of lrede}} - 23 \ ** County for Martha Elizabeth Weaver is in all respects ratified, approved, and ¢o - nfirmed and that this cause is remanded to the said Clerk of Superior vourt, of iy } : - ' Iredell County for further proceedings in te guardianship as the law Provide : 4 *, and that the petitioner be taxed with the costs of thisaction. hig the Rth dav of September, 1955. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding eee OR eee RK EK seer om nwmdinre serge Sh ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM 1955 Thursday, September 8, 1955 Lk IV77 ace NORTH CAROLIN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Nellie G. Phifer VSe Charles F. Phifer [This cause coming onto be heard and being heard hefore the Honorable Hubert Oliv ne Judre Presiding, at the August 1955 Term of the Iredell County Superior Court and it appearing to the court that a verified petition was file by the plaintiff in this action under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement Act of the State of New York and that a summons was issued and that thc matter was properly transmitted to the state of North Carolina for their action, and that a summons was issued on this action on November 26, 1955. And it appearins to the court that the said summons, tozether with a copy of the petition was personallv served on the defendant in Iredell County, North Carolina on December 2, 1951. And it further appearing to the court that no answer or demurrer or ny the defendant ard no extension of time to file it further appearing to the court in the verified pleadings that this action has been properly brought under Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act of the State of North Carolina and it further appearing to the court that the plaintiff is entitled to an allowance for support of herself and her three THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant pay into the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina the sum of $25.00 per week for the use and benefit of the plaintiff and tht the sum he transmitted to her under the Uniform Recitrocal Enforcement of Support Act. It is further ordered that the defendant give a cash oF properly endorsed bond of $1,000.00 to insure his proper performance of this judgment and that the firm of Land, Sowers & Avery be allowed $100.00 as attorneys fee in this matter as attorneys for the plaintiffand that the defendant pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the clerk. Hubert EB. Oliv udge Presiding This the 7th day of September, 1955. wm ok mk oe ok oe ok oe me ke ke ke mK Oe OK IN THE. SUPERIOR COURT eae D WEEK AUGUST TERM, 1955 oe rhursday, September 8, 1955 Doleither Smyre Scott Vs Wade Franklin Scott Continued. Junius Redmond Vs Lettie Baker Redmond Continued. Margaree White Vs Robert Lee White, J Continued. 3, C. Steelman, al Vs A. D. Renegar, al Continued. John Rondville Turner Vs Edward Scheidt, Commissioner of - hs gre Ms i Motor Vehicles of N. centinued. Clarence L. Poole BNF Sarah M. Cornelius Vs Continued. Clay Harris Vs W. E. Steelman Continued. Renizer Lytle Vs Samuel Jay Karnick Continued. Sample-Winters Implement Co Vs Edward ™ Cloaninger & m [,. Roy Hoover T/AC&H Implement Co Continued. Mrs. Mae Hendren Vs J. B. Hendren Gontinued. Jimmy Shuford BNF John Shuford Vs Koss Lowthorpe Continued. * Lester Lee Sloan Vs Lee Graham Caudill Continued. Statesville Flour Mills Co Vs Mrs. W. ©. Goodnight T/A Goodnicht Poultry Farm---Continued. Statesville Flour Mills Co Vs H. W. Goodnight Continued. Sp387L WRB; Martha Elizabeth Weaver, Incompetent. Upon the comine in of the verdict, Petitioners move to set verdict aside 6 being against the sreater might of the evidence. Motion denied. Judgment. signed. Petitioners give notice of appeal in open Court to Supreme Court for errors signed and to he assigned. Further notice waived. Appellant. Allowed 90 lays to Serve case on appeal and Respondents allowed 60 days thereafter to serve ‘Ounter case or exceptions. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding ve * Court is adjourned sine - die. l#5928 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Zeb V. K. Dickson, * Plaintiff-Petitioner, * x vs * “ Board of Education of Iredell x County and S. H. Helton, County % Superintendent of Schools of * Iredell County, and the Board of % Commissioners of Iredell County, x N. U., said Board being composed % f W. H. Keeter, Chairman, and * J. We. Ervin, Vance Wagner and * Re. D. Wallace, ** me Respondents-Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court, and heingheard, and it appearing from statements of counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner and counsel for the respondents-defendants, that all matters and thinzs in controversy between the parties have been comprised and settled. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby, nonsuited and dismissed and the judgment heretofore entered against the Board of Education is ordered cancelled. it is further ordered that the respondents-defendants be taxed with the This the 5th day of August, 1955. C. Ge. Smith Clerk of Superior Court By consent of: Burke & Burke and J. G. Lewis By: Je H. Burke Attorneys for Plaintiff-Petitioner Re A. Collier We RK. Battley | Attorneys for hespondents-Defendants . Zeb ve a Dikson Plaintiff-Petitioner See ££ ERE OC EER Se eee 58 ‘ir CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT -qapeLL COUNTY ing, de Co Bagle irss Je * praintiff, Oo G2 c = VSe iawrence Be Dearmon and ‘ng, Lawrence &» Dearmon, e Defendants. a ee ee ie Se eee See ee” | | I | | | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable », G, Smith, the Clerk ef the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the pladings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendants have agreed to pay to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of Two Hundred Twenty-five and no/100 ($225.00) lollars in full accord and stisfaction thereof; WOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sumof Two Hundred lwenty-five and no/100 ($225.00) Dollars, and that the costs of this action he assessed aainst the plaintiff and defendant for one half each to be taxed by the clerk. This 30 day of August, 1955. C. & Smith Clerk Superior Court NANO Dar WNOENT s red G, Chamblee ‘red G. Gamblee, Attorney for the wand , Sowers klajaps’’ Ui Neil S$. Sowers torneys Tor the Defendants Seen eS eee he ew ee eS UNITED STATES DISTRICT couRT #503b FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SPERIOR COURT STATESVILLE CIVIL NO. 300 7 REDELL COUNTY ft nn ) s | ED STATES OF AMERICA ) clay Harrtes intiff, Ve ) JUDGMENT oi, RYRSMENT i JOSEPH M. HASTINGS \, i Steelman, ) } Defendant. ) This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard upon motion of James ft Ue being heard before the H b ¢ he hae ee : : . ¥ : h4 e coming on to be heard and being efore e Honorable C. M. Baley, Jr., United States Attorney, and it appearing to the Court from the ae om erk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing t record in this cause that the facts are as follows: snith, te fe oe rP roe i ieee f el that all matte a , io : ‘ : from the statement of couns ii matters of controversy set hat complaint was filed and summons issued on July 25, 1955, and the Re . i e pleadings have been agreed upon hy the parties, that the defendant personally served upon the defendant by the United States Marshal for this ott Tee . , intiff and theplaintiff has azreed i mie : = has agreed to pay to the plaintiff an plainti S agreed to accept the a‘ District on July 27, 1955; that no answer or other plea has been filed by the “7 te sun of One Hundred Twenty-five and no/100 ($125.00) Dollars and the costs of defendant, and no appearance entered by him or anyone on his behalf: that this ; a this action, in full accord and satisfaction thereof; action is brought by reson cf overpayment of subsistence allowance to the defendant; that the amount due is definite and certain: that the time for filing NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the q answer in this cause has expired and the plaintiff is entitled to the relief plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred Twenty-five i 4a prayed for; and nof100 ($125.00) Dollars and the costs of this action to be taxed by the | bi IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff, the Clerk. ii United States of America, have and recover of the defendant, JOSEPH ™. HASTINGS, fi de We a . This lst day of September, 1955. the sum of 3195.00 together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from April C. G. Smith ‘ae 11, 1952, until paid, and the costs of this action. Clerk Superior Court | i The Clerk of this Court will certify transcripts of this judgment 6r filing ® CONSENT: iit in the offices of the Clerks of Superior Court for Mecklenburg and Iredell Counties, red G, Chamblee | “| = ; ; ‘red G, Chamblee, Attorney, for the a i North Carolina. Plaintiff. if in This, the 3lst day of August, 1955. scott, Collie r and Nash aa Ai i Rye ‘hip Wilson Warlick *y+_R. A. Collier Hi WILSON WARLICK, U. : Attorneys for the Defendant. i JUDGE. ae Ko ok me ek ok Mek ok Ok ok Ke kK OK ; % ke kK KK eR kK Re Ke OK y Co : 4 os pene i woes) ia NORTH CAROLINA ‘ i ‘ ij N THE SUPERIOR COuRT A007 IREDELL COUNT | icaTH CAROLIN IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT ae ; Y 7 : Dillard Youns Hutchens, qanBLL COUNT ee Plaintiff, q : 11 Oil Company 3 oe v8. JUDGMENT p. Pe Koma Plaintiff Hi i re Ue eae We E. Steelman, ) VS. ) ou oe . I iy \ ie Defendant. ) a 3, M. Cloaninger and Je R. Hoover ie | 3 , uc, &H Implement Company a This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Defendants Piha oo. C. G. Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it a THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk i Both, ee appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel that the parties hereto ee of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon moticn by the plaintiff for I; ae i ie have adjusted and settled ail matters and things between them in connection | i : iudgment against the defendant by default final; i ; with this action, and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in | ! E And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and ie At his action: ish ie i fs baa a summons issued in this action on the 5th day of July, 1955; a i IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff ie And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a ee be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. : re i ae copy of said complaint were served on the defendants, &. \. Cloaninger and (ge i; This lst day of September, 15. a yet he i,k, Hoover on the 6th day of July, 1955; va Ws C. G. Smith : ‘ i Bh | Clerk Superior court And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or other i : CONSENT: pleading has been filed by the defendants and no extension of time to file fi pleads ; oes i 6 et 1 a Fred G. Chamblee pleadings has been cranted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed ee e Fred G. Chamblee, Attorney for the ; : OR a Plaintiff. "as expares; tie Rei We ei , +a) | , Scott, Collier and Nash and it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the Hegel 4 By: Re. A. Collier ruse Of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of. Attorneys for the Defendant. voney #4 , i mney fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Seven Hundred ifty-Seven and mf e,uReE KR eK KK KKK KK K Ke H 4/100 (8 esi. : j (00 \9757.58) Dollars, with interest thereon from date; i Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff : Et: "ae and recover of the defendants the sum of Seven Hundred Fifty-Seven and 58/100 ; 1 we 8759 " | 757,58) Dollars, with interest thereon from date; and the costs of this action. This li day of September, 1955. Ge iP Smith Clerk of the Superior Court KKK KR KKK KK KK KK OK OK —s 2 as STS oe Jit 5654 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Willie Click ) Piaintiff VS. JUDGMENT OF NON-SuTT Hugh k. Brvant Defendant ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina ’ and as appearing to the Court that a summons was issued on November 16 ’ 1953, and services of said process was not had upon these Defendants; 2s 4 o therefore ordered and adjudged that the action be non-suit and dismissed and the Plaintiff taxed with the cost, which have been paid in [This the 17th day of June, 195i. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court. » . . ¢ % ‘ es ‘ Me 1 6( 92 ( DAROLINA oa sa a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT inmnvoLL COUNTY hirs. Hazel Stamper, * Plaintiff, VS ; JUDGMENT Dallas Campbell, and wife, x: Mrs. Billie x. Campbeli, x Defendants, This cause comine on to be heard, and heing heard, before the undersigned Cl awl o “a ’ ; . ‘és ‘ ™ i a ae a ss a : . vierk of superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing ‘° the Court from statement of counsel that all matters and things in controvers! he Wea +hoe nore + ° ‘ ‘ rat between the parties to this action have been compromised and settled and tha the plaintiff desires to take a nonsuit in this action: It'is, therefore, by consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed a ee action be, and the same is, hereby nonsuited and dismissed. This the 10th dav of september, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court By consent of: Mrs. Hazel Stamper Plaintiff Re A. Hedrick Attorney for Plaintiff moe Me ok oe me ke ke ke ke ke me me Etna ‘a CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT case COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK ae and Savings Bank, f peoples Loan Plaintiff JUDGMENT -vs- me NI { wang G, Sims and Maggie T. Pruitte, lemard G Defendants { This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk if Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon motion by the Plaintiff ‘or judgment against the Defendants, Leonard G. Sims and Magzie T. Pruitte, by iefault finals And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and symmonses issued in this action on the ldth day of July, 1955; And it further appearing to the Court that said Summons together with the copy of said complaint, was served on the Defendant, Leonard G. Sims on the 18th jay of July, 19553 And it further appearing to the Court that the said Summons together with m copy of said Complaint was served on the Defendant, Magzie T. Pruitte, on the th day of July, 1955; And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer or other jleadings have been filed by the Defendants, no extension of time to file pleadings tas been granted and that the time within which such pleadinzs may be filed has ‘xpireds And it further appearing to the Court “rom the verified complaint that the “use of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of “ney fixed by the contract, to wit, the sum of FIVE HUNDRED TWO AND 78/100 *502.78) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from the lith day of July, 1955, until Paid at the rate of Six per cent (64 per annum: dnd it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the ‘laintift claims the right to the possession of One 1947 Miller Cadillac Ambulance, wri Murder 3420793, Motor Number 3420793, in order that it may sell the same as vided in g certain Chattel Mortgage executed by the Defendants on November 16, vi duly recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Rutherford County, North : “arolina, in Chattel Mortgage Book 65, at Page 14, and that ancillary: +e this “tion, the Plaintirt caused to be issued Claim and Delivery Papers for ” ‘OW, THEREFORE, t the Plaintiff have it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED tha Pruitte, the sum of “"d reeoy ° 3 * Of th Defendants, Leonard G. Sims and Maggie T- interest’ thereon from the lith day of July, 19553 That the personal property above described be sold at Public auction f cash, to the highest bidder at said sale, after posting notice of saiq a E provided in General Statute 1-339.18 at the Courthouse Door in Statesville North Carolina, and to that end, M. L. Nash is appointed Commissioner of " Court and directed to sell the same as hereinabove Provided and to Convey a; Y Qld propety by Bill of Sale to the highest bidder therefor and to further execyt @ any otherpapers in connection with the title of said motor vehicle ’ the Certificate of Title for said vehicles; hat the said Commissioner is furt! er directed to credit the amount received therefor, less the recular costs of said Tula ts of said sae, upon the monetary judgment herein rendered; and that the Plaintiff recoy- of the Defendants the cost of this action. This 20 day of September, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court , y kk ke ee x elon (OR CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL CO 5 5 n . ee - 4 cc © G2 C 3 ‘his cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that under the Claim and Delivery issued in this cause the plaintiff did not receive the possession of the personal property described in the said action for the reason that the defendants gave a sufficient undertaking and ¢ €pt possession of the said personal property; * And it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendants } ro 14 —— be s ‘ . ° ment fave adjusted all matters and controversies existing between them by the pay of the defendant to the plaintiff of the amount asked for by the plaintiff ig the costs of this action: nee ¢ It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that upon the motion 0 Land, Sowers and Avery, that the plaintiff be and is allowed to take a nom Suit, and that the plaintiff is hereby non-suited, and taxed with cost. This 22 September, 1955, 7 C. G. Smith — Clerk Superior Court OK OK ook ake sk ook ook oe oe oe oe ke ok ok oe ok OK OK Particularly en g ORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CO 12EDELL COUNTY ihe ) T ule august Ruol’, Plaintiff, oe j Ve ) ee My -jythe Brothers Company, ) . Fesperman, and “)i4am B. Davis, itt? Defendants. ) This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the aad ' norior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing that it has been agreed that Q } q * 4 tore a ao ¥ vy, ne We sydoment may be entered as set forth below It is. therefore, by consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the v ’ ™ slaintiff have and recover nothing of the defendants and that the defendants he taxed with the costs. This 29 day of September, 1955. ie Consent: LAND, SOWERS, AVERY & WARD Neil 5. Sowers Attorneys for plaintiff sane SOIT, COLLIER & NASH R. A. Collier Attorneys for A ‘esperman and Da f era C. H. Gover attorney for defendant. ‘uvthe Brothers Company Ye we - ye ae we ye ve we L625 PUD ‘orth Carolina, redell County «. Lillie Mae Combs, Toe eentift. Company, Vs. an, and = q 5 ; ris } U MEN 3 rshall Comdos, ’ \ ar Oh £ 5 + Defendants, Defendant. << I This cause coming on to be heard befor yperior Court of Iredell County, State of ndant : a ’ ' " : and it appearing to the Court tnat tne piainti heard and it appearing that all n ers in non-suit: ies on account of the things and matte It is, therefore, ordered anc een compromised, settled and adjusted, that the plaintifs § the same ® herebv non-Suited and dis ischarged, and does hereby forever release and discharge, the jefendant pay the Court costs not Jitional defendant from all claims and causes of action which j This October claim, whether now known or not, that Auzust -ased and dis- iefendants, Blythe sonsented tos claim or ik, A, Hedrick Attorney for plainti* heen agreed that 7 J. G Lewis " — ltt $ Tr aie al as ont he entered, one-thi f which shall be paid wvorney for Defendan rothers Company, and the | ce by the other dezen- defendant. vy consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the . 1 : Qo ; r a G A. r of the defendants, Blythe Brothers Company, Neaututiadea ss : : ; : ‘sie Hedrick Leftwick, Plaintiff ne if liam E. Davis, and the additional defendant, August sue’, os : : . . ry 1 sa } aid Hundred and no/100 ($3500.00) Dollars, to be P ,» Defendant t ts 1 op : ‘ : defendants he costs of this action to D taxed acainst the de THIS CAUSE ‘ i : \ } fore the undersigned a ‘84 coming on to be heard and being neara fore Un it : defendant. i : ae lin d it appearing lor Court of Iredell County, ina, anc PP 0 the ¢ e > Plaintiff vue UO fy 4, 7 biatnet?t: * t the Fiaintil urt from Statements of the Counsel of the Plaintiff that th Sires “0 take a voluntary nonsuit in her action} IT IS 7 siciieens bie laintiff be and onsent: oT ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaint Vu IEREFORE ORDERED 1S hereby n ATT ’ erm on ; > s . . _ r > > tSe INU, SOWERS, AVERY & WARD Onsuited in her action, and that she pay the costs This ¢ oe | e ‘ 55 __ Neil De yowers_ c . — . Mii deity sia Attorneys for plaintif? a . Cc. Ge Smith : is ve is , a ; Court 8COTT, COLLIER & NASH Clerk of the Superior By Re A, Col) ier a ee Attorneys for defendants, esperman and Davis “claughlin & Pattley - Attorney for additional ( £ " defendant, Aucust Ruof, J By W. R. Battley re wv CV. H, Gover Attorney for defendant, Blythe Brothers Company Kok ke oe oe oe te ok ok ok ok ok ok me eK OF JH 607), North Carolina I : in the Superior Court Gounty a 1 redell W. Westmoreland and Nestrmoreland T/A ooresville Roofing and Company pany ee roodni 7oodnis Company be heard and beine heard befre the Honorable Superior Court of Iredell County North Carolina, upon p } on fs for judgement against the de fendants, T. Es Goodnish: default final: appearing to the Court that a verifie [ int was filed and sunros this action of the 2ist day of June, Summons together with a cor inizht on the 27th day 0 the summons together with >y of the complaint was serve on the court demurrer, or other that no answer, the defendants or anv one of and no extension 0: en granted and that time in which pleadings filed has expires + tho further fron complaint that appearing to the court the sists of the breach of an express contract to pay 4 sm” namely, the sum of Four Thousand One Hundred Aanet) ract, / 196.90), with interest thereon from May 22, 19545 ‘ Voaintif{s fa is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintl::s and Te be Goodnight, UDey the s¥ fendants, T. E. Goodnirht +heredh yards ‘ : ‘eee i jis TAA fa $ j est Hundred Ninety Six and 90/100 Dollars, with inter f : 3 costs 0! centum from the 22nd day of May, 1954, and the Cc. Ge Smish Super! rt Clerk of the Superior Cou be: Ys ws ‘ ; OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE cOUNTY OF IREDELL stats OF NORTH CAROLINA Vs JANES GRAY HEMMINGS This cause coming on to be heard and mderdoned Resident Judge of the 22nd Judicial iefendant, James ‘vay Hemmings, haing been returned to Court as a probation, and a report of said violations being made to the Court esnell, State Probation Officer, whereupon the Court finds the following facts: That at the May 1954 Term of Iredell County Superior Honorable J. Aw Rousseau, Judze Presiding, the plea of guilty to the crime of Breaking, Enteri ‘eupon sentenced this defendant to twelve (12) months assigned under the supervision of the State Hichway and mission , entence being suspended and the said James Gray ings was placed on probation fora period of 4 years under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation vonmission and its officers, under the usual conditions of probation. Court further finds that the defendant has violated his conditions of probation as follows: | \ As ‘ . APP ry . . ° , 1 7 \a/ At the September 1955 Term of Surry County Superior Court, before nonorable Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding, this probationer entered a Tul i rr rrayer or sty te the charge of violating narcotic laws, and “ontinued. This is in violation of that condition of probation Aat the probationer shall "Violate no penal law of any state or the ‘overnment and be of general good behavior". NOW, THEREF ORE, former 4ud rent of it is ordered and adjudged that the prohati h " ‘ pas , aw ation be revoked and that the said sentence of twelve (12) months in jai tO be ‘, : oes hlic a8signed to work under the supervision of the State Highway and fuodilic “Orks fe mm > : . . . vonmission, heretofore suspended, is ordered into effect and comm its j ment ordered issued ° ‘his the 28th day of September, 1955. Hubert E. Olive RESIDENT JUDGE 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT * Me oe me ok ke ok ok ok ok oe ok ok Ok oe mk a 2 a —_ P iB 3 of i o” 46095 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR courT IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Industrial Bank, Plaintiff Virginia G. Johnson and Johnny Frier, v8. : JUDGMENT ) ) ) Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard upon the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorneys for the Plaintiff filed in this cause, in which said motion the plaintiff asks that the judgment of voluntary non suit heretofore entered in this cause be set aside and canceled and that the plaintiff have and recover judgment of the defendnts on the pleadings, as no answer or demurrer or other pleadings have been filed in this cause within the time allowed by law, And the court finding that the facts set forth in the said motion are true and that this action is for a sum definite and that the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment by default final on the pleadings and for the further relief asked for by the plaintiff. It is now therefore, upon the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of a voluntary non suit heretfore entered by th plaintiff in this cause be and the same is hereby set aside and canceled of record and that the plaintiff have and recover judgment against the defendants and each of them for the sum of $325.00 with interest from the 16th day of September, 1955 until paid. That the plaintiff have and recover possession of the automobile deseribet in the said complaint, to wit: One 1952 Customline Sedan, Motor No. B2uk- 116159 in order that the same may be sold as provided by law and the proceeds, less the cost of the sale be applied to the judgment. That the plaintiff have and recover judgment of the defendants surety, Earl Hollar, in the amount of $325.00 plus interest from the 16th day of September, 1955, until paid. This judgment against the defendants surety, 98ion Earl Hollar, to be in force and effect if he fails to surrender the post cause of the said automobile described above to the plaintiff in as good as was on the date that he executed the defendants undertakings 4m ai The costs of this action to be taxed against the defendants, This the 13 day of October, 1955. ork of Superson akeeKRR RK HK FH feud yonTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ' Bemis Broe Bag Company Plaintiff v8. eUPDGHE NT | yalter B. Miller, T/A Plant Food Company Iredell Defendant THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard and bd ng heard before the Honorable ¢, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 9th day of September, 1955; And it further appearing to the Court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 10th day of September, 1955; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed within the time prescribed by law; And it further mpearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of morey, fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Six Hundred Thirty Two and | 09/100 ($632.09) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 27th day of December, 195hs Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Six Hundred Thirty Two and 09/100 (632.09) with interest thereon from the 27th day of December, 1954, and the Costs of this action, This 15 day of October, 1955. C; G, Smith asians erk of the Superior Court “en KRK KKK KKK KK KH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 17, 1955 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OCTOBER TERM, 1y55 Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesvilie, N, ¢, on the 17th day of October, 1955, at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where His Honor, Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding and holding Courts for this the Twenty- second Judiciai District of North Carolina, Fall Term, 1955, is present and presiding. JC. Rumple, High Sheriff, of Iredell County is present and opened Cout by Order of the Courts. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as Jurors for this the October Term, 1955, Iredell County Superior Court, for the first week, to-wit: J. F. Holland Fred Oswalt, Jr. Leonard A. Medows R. H. Tucker R. H. Mayberry R. C. Foster Ned T. Mills J. O. Cain Sam T. Goodman Charles K. Austin James A. Swaney T. A. Morrow Durman W. Moose Ben T. Clark James F, Carlton E “yorTH CAROLINA | NORTH CAROLINA | IREDELL COUNTY T. S. Coffey, Jr. J. H. Adams A. C. Robinson Flake C. Daniels Mack M. Kerr Bruce R. Carrigan I. G. Cannon T. J. Troutman John Stewart Ruben R. Cowles G. W. Knox John Joseph Ottone B. G. Kurfees Jay J. Crater J. M. Blackwelder Albert H. Cooper Glenn Crater Cecil Troutman J. L. Sells J. E. Davis Joe W. Beaver, Jr. James A. Swaney and I. G. Cannon were excused by Doctor's Certificates: Ruben R. Cowles, Joe W. Beaver, Jr., and J. E. Davis were excused by Court. rm The following were excused at last term of Court to be back this te P, D. Lipe, J. E. Levan and Charles E. Donaldson rmed The following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be " the Divorce Jury #1 to-wit: is J. F. Holland Flake C. Danie J. O. Cain Ben T. Clark T. 3. Coffey, Jr. J. He. Adams T. A. Morrow ; A. Charles K. Austin C. Robinson IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------~-- OCTOBER TERM? 1955 Monday, October 17, 1955 46029 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ipeDELL COUNTY OCTOBER TERM 1955 Peacock / oe ainti VS. , Vance Peacock q Defendant 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. 2, Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OCTOBER TERM 1955 Ella Hilson Peacock P aintiff V8. JUDGMENT | Vance seagock f erendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the » Tesular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the | ‘ssues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as | 4ppears in the record; and the Court having investigated to its satisfaction the --Paintift and the conditions under which she is attempting to raise the child born | ‘Othe marriage, and finds that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person and should be awarded the sdle mre, custody and control of the infant child, Denny Haskel Peacock, TT IS, THEREFORE, Ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of ‘ ‘Triage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the 8a —e hereby dissolved and set aside, and the plaintiff is granted an solute divorce from the It ig defendant. further ordered that the care, custody, and control of the minor child, Denn vel. eacock, be awarded to the plaintiff. It {8 further ordered that the defendant pay the costs of this action. This 17th day of October, 1955. —— hee rants eek eee ee ee KH FH | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST wien TA oe GOecm iee 1 FIRST WEEK -----~ --- ae TERM, 1955 Monday, October 17, 1955 ° 995 Monday, October 17, 1955 ae ind it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action NORTH CAROLINA ) | ro be taxed by the Clerk. IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT This 17th day of October, 1955. Wilford Ray Ross : s Plaintiff ubert E. Olive Judge Presiding vs a KKK KK KKK KOK KK Mildred Pearl Whitener Ross, Defendant 46109 ‘ a CAROLINA | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT S IREDELL COUNTY 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in = | field the complaint? i tarts ro Ss Plaintiff Answer: Yes. V8.6 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North . Shirley Kennedy Benfield, : Defendant HHH HH HH Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. Answer. Yes, 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart fro 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? | for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. Answer, Yes, So ees eae Se tr 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County for six months NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 7 inmediately preceding the commencement of this action? IREDELL COUNTY : Answer, Yes. Wilford Ray Ross iY Ho WH ae Plaintiff ig JUDGMENT 5 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | IREDELL COUNTY Mildred Pearl Whitener Ross, Defendant | larry Lee Benfield, Pd THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Hubert v8. JUDGMENT i a) S Shi E. Olive, Jude Presiding and a jury at the October 1955 Term of the Superior : rley Kennedy Benfield a ‘ Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant bas r This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the os a been properly served personally with process, and the following issues havin” ie “gular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered * F the issues he defendant submitted to and answered by the jury: Submitted to them in favor ofthe plaintiff and against the ? in | °S appears 4 ‘ 1, Were the plaintiff and the defmdant lawfully married 4s alleged } n the record; the complaint? It is, therefore, ORDERED, CONSIDERED AND ADJUDGED that the bonds of narr{ ANSWER: "Yes", age heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the 8a state of Worth n® are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the a as voree from the def Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? efendant. It is ¢ this action. ANSWER: "Yes", urther ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of rt fro Hubert E, Oli 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and aps udge Presiding. ? each other for two years next preceding the briging of this acttes ; ee RR RR et ANSWER: "Yes", sniff, NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the pla from the Wilford Ray Ross, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divord® imony defendant, Mildred Pearl Whitener Ross, and that the bonds of matr and ¢ heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and ® hereby dissolved, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- OCTOBER T Monday, October 17, 1955" — S$6116 North Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County Carol Mae B. Grady by her next friend Gracie Mae Brack VS. Issues Robert Graham Grady 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. 2. Were the plaintiff and detendant married as alleged in the complaint’ Answer: Yes. 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separ and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this actin! Answer: Yes. North Carmina In The Superior Court Iredell County Carol Mae B. Grady By her next friend Gracie Mae Brack vs Judgment Robert Graham Grady This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Hubert £&. Olive, Judee Presiding over the October Civil Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and being bar before said Honorable Hubert E. Olive, and a Jury, the folloing issues were submitted to the Jury: for 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Caroline more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? aint? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the comp d 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they live tion of separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the instit this action? The Jury having answered all of the said issues "Yes". hat the bom It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed ¢ f° d the defendant > 4 be a yinculo froe caxed agaitt! F of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff an ever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce defendant, Robert Graham Grady and the costs of this action be plaintiff by the Clerk, tuberin keke ke ek ek ee HF This 17th day of October, 1955. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ -- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 17, 1955 #6119 WORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. penjamin Robinson Vs. tS3SsuUueR88 Christine Robinson 1. Has the Plaintiff, Benjamin Robinson, been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than one year next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. 2. Were the Plaintiff and Defendant married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Have the Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart for more than two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Benjamin Robinson vs JUDGMENT Christine Robinson This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the October Term, 1955 of Iredell Superior Court and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to them a8 follows: l. Has the Plaintiff, Benjamin Robinson, been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than one year next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes, *. Were the Plaintiff and Defendant married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer; Yes, 3 Have the Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart for more than tw ° years next Preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes, It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff, Benjamin Robinson and. oe Def *ndant , Christine Robinson be dissolved and the Plaintiff Benjamin Robinson is grant, *d an absolute divorce from Christine Robinson. It is ordered that the Plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This 17¢h day of October, 1955. ——Hibee rksrothe seeenenecenen ee ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 17, 1955 J¥6125 North Carolina In The Superi Iredell County Perior Court R. R. Stallings vs Issues Mary Crow Stallings 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for nore than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County R. R. Stallings vs Judgment Mary Crow Stallings This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Hubert £. Olive, Judge Presiding over the Odober Civil Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and being heard before said Honorable Hubert E. Olive, and a Jury, the following issu were submitted to the Jury: 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolins for more than six months next preceding the irstitution of this action? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the comlti 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived {on separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the inetitet of this action? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". “ t the It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed tha nt be of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defends mm ea yinculo forever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted 4 divore sil be the defendant, Mary Crow Stallings, and that the costs of this —_ against the plaintiff by the Clerk. This 17th day of October, 1955. kee Ke ek ee Oe OF I yorth Carolina, Iredell County rack LeRoy Sisk t FORTH CAROLINAS F IREDELL COUNTY, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 17, 1955 4o131 In the Superior Court, October Term, 1955. Vs t ISSUES F connie Whitlow Sisk ! 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other and are they now I usband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2, Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separate ; and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institution of ; this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North ' Carolina for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as F alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, OCTOBER TERM, 1955. ; Jack LeRoy Sisk 4 Vs. 4 JUDGMENT s Connie Whitlow Sisk { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the » Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Hubert &. (live, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted 5° it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out min the reocrd; It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of p"rinony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Jack LeRoy Sisk, and the ed )“fendant, Connie Whitlow Sisk, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the pla : ‘ntift{s granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding see eK Ke KK kek ke KK OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK OCTOBER TER Monday, October 17, 1955 M199 W614 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT October 17, 1955 Term R. W. Davis and H. W. Sloop, T/A Davis Supply Company vs. David Sloop 1. How much is the defendant indebted to the plaintirr? Answer: $265.62 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY October 17, 1955 Term R. W. Davis and H. W. Sloop, T/A Davis Supply Company vs. JUDGMENT David Sloop This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by the undersigned Judge and a jury, and the jury having answered the issue against the defendant in the sum of $265.62: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $265.62 and that the plaintiff recover $205.62 from the defendant, and that the defendant pay the costs in this action as shall be taxed by the Clerk. This 17th day of October, 1955. Hubert EB, Olive ———eies Presiding eee Ke KKK KK eK KK | #6105 p tert CAROLINA © REDELL COUNTY F 2, W. Davis and H. W. Sloop tA Davis Supply Company | ORTH CAROLINA > IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK OCTOBER TERM® 1955 Monday, October 17, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT October 17, 1955 Term VSe Paul Hucks 1. How much is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: $326.93. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT October 17, 1955 Term 8, W, Davis and H. W. Sloop, ; 1/A Davis Supply Company VS. JUDGMENT E Paul Hucks This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by the undersigned Judge and a jury, and the jury having answered the issue against the defendant in the } sum of $326.93: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant is indebted F to the plaintiff in the sum of $326.93 and that the plaintiff recover $326.93 | from the defendant, and that the defendant pay the costs in this action as shall ; be taxed by the Clerk. This 17th day of October, 1955. Hubert E, Olive Judge Presiding eK KKK KKK KK KK OH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WE&K ------- SUPERIOR Court, 1955 Monday, October 17, 1955 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY I, Jack R. Harris, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution t the United States, so help me God. ———fack Re tarris I, Jack R. Harris, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the Government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of the said State, not inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States, to the best of my knowledge and ability, so help me God, Jack R, Harris I, Jack R. Harris, do swear that I will truly and honestly demean myself ip the practice of an attorney, according to the best of my knowledge and ability, so help me God. Jack R, Harris Mr. Jack R. Harris having been introduced to the Court by Mr. Robert 4. Collier of Statesville, North Carolina, who presented Certificate of the Boart o/ Examiners of the North Carolina State Bar that Mr. Harris had been licensed to practice the profession of law, the Court thereupon, in open court, administerti the foregoing oaths which are prescribed for Attorneys at Law, and also the st? of allegiance to the State and to support the Constitution of the United States, and orders that Mr. Harris be admitted to practice law in all the Counties of ™ State of North Carolina. The Court further orders that a record of the licen and oaths administered be recorded in the Minutes of the Court. Done in open court, this the 17th day of October, 1955. udge Pres ng cekKK KK ee Ke Ke eK KK KF j r 18, 19 This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Oetorel at 9:30 o'clock A. M. x Abby eget | fred Ostwalt, Jr. G. W. Knox E Sam T. Goodman ; James F. Carlton : John Stewart R. H. Tucker ss IN THE aT aeteae WEEK “ona e ee ERM, 1955 raat Tuesday, October 18, 1955 qT 0 mn Adams vs grown Paving Company, A Corp. + 45902 vs ; Brown Paving Company, A Corp These cases are consolidated for judgment, whereupon the following jury | yas sworn and impanelled: R. C. Foster John J, Ottone Ned T. Mills Leonard A. Medows B. G. Kurfees Jay J. Crater Pending trial, the court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, October 19, 1955. 45937 | NORTH CAROLINA, ) IREDELL COUNTY. | Thelma Dawkins, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OCTOBER, 1955 CIVIL TERM Petitioner, Vs. i Theotis Dawkins, Respondent. This matter being heard before his Honor, Hubert E. Olive, Judge presiding, * the Iredell County Superior Court, October Term, 1955, at Statesville, North ; “arolina, which is an action under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement ofSupport : ets that it appearing to the Court than an action was instituted in the ; Intermediate Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, by Thelma Dawkins, Petitioner, | *Sainst Theotis Dawkins, Respondent, in which she sought support for herself and ph Die children, on January 7, 1955; that thereafter, a certified copy of the Proceeding was transmitted by the Judge of the Intermediate Court of Kanawha County, , Ww : "St Virginia, to the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County; that upon receipt of | OF the certified copies of the petition and other necessary and appropriate papers, th * Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on January 14, 1955, issues & Sum Mons Commanding the Sheriff of Iredell County to summons Theotis Dawkins to ap Pear and file a written answer to the petition of Thelma Dawkins, 48 required Sy laws "3 that the summons was received by the Sheriff of Iredell County on January Ub, : 955 and was thereafter, served on Theotis Dawkins, on January 26, 19553 that no an Swer or other Pleadings were filed by Thetis Dawkins, and the tine hae nom ®xpir 4 and elapsed for the filing of an answer or any other pleadings by ee Ndent » that thereafter, on October 11, 1955, the Clerk of the Superior Court, of 7 ll Tede}) County issued a notice in this cause, commanding the Sheriff of Irede FIRST WEEK oan ee OBER eressosee OCTOBER .T Tuesday, October 18, 1955" i County to summons Theotis Dawkins to personally be and appear before th @ at the Courthouse in Statesville, North Carolina, on Monday, October 17, 19555 at 10200 4 , Honorable Hubert E. Olive, Judge of Superior Court o'clock for a hearing in the pending action: and it further appearing to the Court that this notice was served on Theotis Dawkins by leaving a trys and correct copy thereof with him by the Sheriff of Iredel} County, on October 17, 1955; and the Court further finds that the Respondent, Theotis Dawkins, is properly before the Court as provided by law, And it further appearing to the Court that this matter was heard upon a certified copy of the petition filed by the Pettioner, statements by counse) for Petitioner, and statements and information furnished by the Respondent, Theotis Dawkins; that after hearing all of the evidence and Statements of coun) and the Respondent, Theotis Dawkins, the Court finds the following facts: That the Petitioner, Thelma Dawkins, and the Respondent, Theotis Dawkins, were married in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, on July 8, 1951; that they are now man and wife; that born to the marriage are two children, Theotis Dawkins, Jr., three years of age, and Walter Lynn Dawkins, one year 0! age; that the Petitioner, Thelma Dawkins, is now a resident of 311 Christopher Street, Charleston, West Virginia, and that the children are living with ani being supported by their mother; that Theotis Dawkins, the Respondent, has 10 lived with his wife and children since July, 1954 and has not made any contribution for their support since that time except one payment of Ten Dollars ($10.00); that the Respondent, Theotis Dawkins, is an able-bodied m and physically able to work; that he is minfully employed and makes approxinste!) Thirty-One Dollars $31.00) per week; that the Petitioner, Thelma Dawkins, is not employed, and she has no means of supporting herself and her children a is now residing in a home provided by her mother. the That upon the foregoing, the Court further finds as a fact, that hersel! Petitioner is entitled to support by her husband, Theotis Dawkins, for i y attorneys It is and her children, and that she does not have sufficient means to Pa fees or other costs in the prosecution of her action to secure support therefore upon the foregoing findings of fact, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: e of the 1. That the Respondent, Theotis Dawkins, pay into the offic 50.00! Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, the sum of Fifty bee for the services of C. H, Dearman, attorney for the Petitioner. he ice of ¢ 2. That the Respondent, Theotis Dawkins, pay into the off Se ollars $10.0" Petitioner and her children as provided by law. ater Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, the sum of Ten D Saturday, October 22, 1955, and a like sum on each succeeding u after, to be dispursed by the Clerk of Superior Court for the 8 Ee . i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT EK ---------- CTOBER TERM, 1955 — roretay. October 18, 1955 3. For the cost of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of Superior Court . this cause is retained for further orders. signed and entered in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, at Statesville, North Carolina, on October 18, 1955, Hubert E. Olive Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding KKK KO KK KR Rk Kk RK K This Honorable Court takes @ recess until Wednesday Morning, October 19, 1955, at 9339 O'clock A. M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, October 19, 1955 “#5950 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE § IREDELL COUNTY UPERIOR Court T. C. Adams, Plaintiff VS testes Brown Paving Company, a Corp. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant 1. Was the automobile of the plaintiff, T. C. Adams, damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes. 2. If so, did the plaintiff contribute to the damage of his automobile by the negligence of his agent, Mae S. Adams, as alleged in the answer? ANSWER: No, 3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff, T. C. Adams, entitled to recover of the defendant tor the damages to his automobile? ANSWER: $250.00 SE 5982 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mae S. Adams, Plaintiff -vVS- Brown Paving Company, a corporation, Defendant (1) Was the plaintiff, Mae S. Adams, injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: (2) negligence? Yes, If so, did the plaintiff contribute to her injuries by her own Answer: No. t0 (3) What amount, if any, is the plaintiff, Mae S. Adams, entitled recover of the defendant? Answer: $2,250.00. > IREDELL COUNTY varshal IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, October 19, 1955 /#6151 yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Douglass Pharr, ee Plaintiff EB sivard Sheidt, Commissioner of ; Department | North Carolina, of Motor Vehicles of Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable bert BE, Olive, Judge Presiding at the October Civil Term of the Iredell county Superior Court, upon the verified petition of Marshall Douglass Pharr, : plaintiff herein, and the verified answer of the defendant; And it appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact from the F vleadings aforesaid and from the sworn testimony of the petitioner the following: 1, That on July 10, 1955, the petitioner driving a 1950 Plymouth Station Wagon automobile collided with one 1955 Chevrolet automobile being driven by Gordon B. Tarwater, which collision occurred at the inter- section of South Carolina HIghways Nos. 9 and 90. not have liability the laws of the That at the time of said collision the petitioner did insurance or financial responsibility as required by State of North Carolina. That said accident was the sole and proximate result ofthe said Gordon B. Tarwater's negligent operation of his vehicle and that all damages and injuries sustained by any persons or property as a result of said accident was due to the said Gordon B. Tarwater's negligence and not as a result of any negligence on the part of the petitioner herein, Marshall Douglass Pharr. 4, That on September 16, 1955, the petitioner's driving privileges and operator's license were suspended by the defendant. >» That the petitioner has been aggrieved by the defendant's order Suspending his said operator's license and driving privileges. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the : vontissioner of Motor Vehicles for North Carolina, defendant herein, revoking the g ‘riving Privileges and operator's license of the petitioner, Marshall Douglass SP : ‘arr, as entered by the defendant in this cause be and the same is hereby reversed. This the 17th day of October, 1955. Hubert _E. Olive Judge Presiding * eke KK KK Ke KK KK KK OK OK IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT FIRST WEEK ---------- OCTOBER 7 Wednesday, October 19, 198s 1955 /ys9g2 NORTH CAROLINA IN T IREDELL COUNTY HE SUPERIOR coypr Mae S. Adams, Plaintiff wee JUD Brown Paving Company, a Corporation, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding and a jury at the October term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the issues having been submitted to the jury and answers by them as follows: 1. Was the plaintiff, Mae S. Adams, injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint: Answer: Yes. 2. If so, did the plaintiff contribute to her injuries by her own neglizem! Answer: Yes. 3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff, Mae S. Adams, entitled to reow of the defendant? Answer: $2,250.00 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff ut and recover of the defendant the sum of two thousand, two hundred and fifty dollars,and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 19th day of Odober, 1955. Huber E. Olive Judge Presiding | yt CAROLINA E RSDELL COUNTY F vge 5. Adams ; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEBK oo-e°------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, October 19, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff as APPEAL ENTRIES ‘trown Paving Company, @ E corporation, Defendant At the dose of the plaintiff's evidence, the defendant, Brown Paving Company, cated the plaintiff's evidence and moved for a judgment as of non-suit. the defendant's motion for a judgment as of non-suit was not allowed and to which F the Supreme Court of North Carolina for errors assigned or to be assigned. ; refusal, defendant duly excepted. At the close of the defendant's evidence, the defendant, Brown Paving Company, moved for a directed verdict in favor of the defendant which motion was F not allowed and to which refusal, defendant dub excepted. Defendant moved that the verdict be set aside and its motion was refused and p defendant duly excepted. To the refusal of granting the motions of the defendant and the signing of 'the judgment the defendant duly excepted. The defendant gave notice in open court of its appeal from this court to Further & notice waived. An appeal bond in the amount of $100.00 was adjudged sufficient. By consent f the defendant was allowed ninety (90) days in which to make up and serve its case »" appeal and the plaintiff was allowed thirty (30) days thereafter in which to B na ; ke up and serve her counter-case on appeal. This 19th day of October, 1955. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presidingat October, 1955, Term of Iredell County Superior Court. we Oe kk kk Re Ke Ke OK tok ok KF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- OCTOBER TERM, 1055 Wednesday, October 19, 1955 " “IORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUP IREDELL COUNTY ERIOR COURT T. C. Adams, Plaintiff -VS- Brown Paving Company, a corporation, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, ’ ubert E. Olive and a jury at the October term of the Superior Court of Iredel) Coy nty and the issues having been submitted to the jury and answered i BW tie 1. Was the automobile of the plaintiff, T. C. Adams, damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. If so, did the plaintiff contribute tothe damage of his automobile by the negligence of his agent, Mae S. Adams, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No. 3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff, T. C. Adams, entitled to recom of the defendant for the damages to his automobile? Answer: $250.00 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintif! have and recover of the defendant the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars a the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk. This 19th day of October, 1955. Hubert _&. O01: Judge Presidi WORTH CAROLINA | r, C. Adams IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, October 19, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Plaintiff --ys-- APPEAL ENTRIES Paving Company rer Defendant At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, the defendant, Brown Paving Company, demurred to the plaintiff's evidence and moved for a judgement as of non-suit. The defendant's motion for a judgment as of non--suit was not allowed and to which refusal, defendant duly excepted. At the close of the defendant's evidence the defendant, Brown Paving Company, moved for a directed verdict in favor of the defendant which motion was net allowed and to which refusal, defendant duly excepted. Defendant moved that the verdict be set aside and its motion was refused and defendant duly excepted. To the refusal of granting the motions of the defendant and the signing | of the judgment the defendant duly excepted. The defendant gave notice in open court of its appeal from this court to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for errors assigned or to be assigned. Further notice waived. An appeal bond in the amount of $100.00 was adjudged sufficient. By consent the defendant was allowed ninety (90) days in which to make up and serve its case on appeal and the plaintiff was allowed thirty (30)days thereafter in vhich to make up and serve his counter-case on appeal. This 19th day of October, 1955. Hubert E, Olive Judge Presiding at October, 1955, Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. eek eK Ke kK ke KK Ke ke KK KOK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, October 19, 1955 #6017 Statesville Flour Mills Co. -VS- Mrs W O Goodnight T/A Goodnight Poultry Farm This case moved from October 31, 1955, on the calendar to November 1, 1955, Kok ok ek eK ek ke & ¥Y6019 Statesville Flour Mills Co. -vs- H. W. Goodnight This case moved from October 31, 1955, on the calendar to November 1, 1055, kek RK KK Kk Ke Ok 145727 Gloria Dorton -vs- Marion Dorton This case moved to the Motion Docket on the calendar for October 31, 195, ee KR RR eR OK ke E5766 Julia Hall stip Ralph Hall This case moved to the Motion Docket on the calendar for October 31, 1% ke KK KK KR KR KR KF 145862 Clydene E. Nagel mili Lawrence E. Nagel This case moved to the Motion Docket on the calendar for October 31, 1%” kek K KK KKK RK OK AH6013 John Rondville Turner -vs- Edward Sheidt, Commissionerof Motor Vehicles of North Carolina. r october 31, 1%" This case moved to the Motion Decket on the calendar fo Ake kK KK KK OK KR KF | fo. 6082 Betty W. Cline vs Thomas W. Cline -----------------.-~.--... Continued. E fo, 6113 : fo. 6031 Dallas A. Roberts vs Arthur E. Orbison . Oe . 599 Pe R Shell vs Roger J. Foster & Juanita L. Foster . Oe © e Ss. 6012 Lester Lee Sloan vs Lee Graham Caudill fo, 554b T. He Davis, Jr. vs R. W. Davis, Jr. Ko. 5877 Mrs. Mae Hendren vs J. B. Hendren q tio, 5962 Thelma Jordan vs Samvel Claude Jordan F fo5p3872 S. C. Steelman et al vs A. D. Renegar, E Mo, 6069 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, October 19, 1955 Junius Redmond vs Lettie Baker Redmond Continued. Beatrice Poole Mayes vs Shuford Mayes Continued. Continued. Continued. : josp3815 WC Chambers & Hallie Chambers vs N C State Highway and Public Works Commission -----~ pe eeece erm oe mien Om ewe mem nee e tern eeeeownenn Continued. Continued. Continued. : No. 5697 Ivah Nisbet Lewis vs Nosco M. Lewis ------------------------ Continued. ; ie. 5779 Leroy Pope vs McLean Trucking Co, Inc. --------- ee ee Continued. Continued. Continued. Continued. James R. Lazenby & Motor Mart, Inc. Continued. fio, 6070 Charles Roscoe Lawter, Gdn of Janice Jgsephine Lawter, minor vs F. S. Bumgardner, Johnnie R. Bumgardner, minor, James R. Lazenby, & Motor Mart, Continued. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, October 2h, 1955 at 10:06 O'clock A. M. Emory Logan Lowe, Admr of William Charles Lowe vs F. S. Bumgardner, minor IN THE SUPERIOR Court SECOND WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 24, 1955 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment On Wednesq ay, October 19, 1955 at 10:00 o'clock A. M. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Cp urt the names of the following good and lawful men and women to Serve as jy rors for this the second week of the October Term, 1955, Iredel] County Superi or Court, to-wit: Robert K. Kerr S. E. Dewey Saunders W. M,. N. Gordon Ketchie F. S. J. Carl Shumaker J. K. Radford H. N. L. A. Plyler J. T. Steele Ed Speaks Joe V. Knox B. H. Johnston James D. Hartness J. B. Floyd B. Smith C. W. C. H. Smith M. R. T. Brantley Mrs. Mary E. Morrison W. R. Hedrick G. E. Tharpe Mrs. Haseltine M. Ntcholson Moore Perry Ostwalt Arthur F, Kennedy Little Sam Miller, Jr. Paul Ellis Fred Davis Stinson Jay Holton Harris Brown Norman, Sr. Feimster Newton Burdette Moose hy N. Gordon Ketchie, G. E. Tharpe and Mrs. Haseltine M. Nicholson excused 17 the Court. F. S. Ostwalt was not found. J. Carl Shumaker was out of state. N. Little was out of county. C. W. Brown is deceased. Mrs. Mary E, Morrison and C. F. Moose were tess excused by Doctor's certific IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 24, 1955 : Jo. 1346 State : vs E ylvie Lee Gant Bio, 1616 State vs ’ J, D. Gray F ios 16bb State vs | troy Fesperman B Yo. 172k State . vs e LD. Wall Ao, 1734 State 4 vs ) Willard L. Dison E Ho. 1747 State vs P Fred L. Smith dio, 1858 State vs s taymon Saunders Spann Eto, 1878 State ; vs ; Gilmer Sherrill B40, 1886 State vs James Campbel) Bo, 1897 State vs | Coyte Houston bo, 1899 State vs Seorge Harri s By State Vs John 7 Click Xo. loys State v8 harles Henry Knox DRIVING DRUNK This case transferred to inactive docket. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON This case transferred to inactive docket. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT This case transferred to inactive docket. DRUNK AND DISORDERLY Alias Capias. SPEEDING Alias Capias. This case transferred to inactive docket. DRIVING DRUNK : This case transferred to inactive docket. POSSESSION FOR SALE Abated by Death. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT Defendant called and failed. and Capias Instanter. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa POSSESSION NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Alias Capias. POSSESSION NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant appeared and showed good behavior. BASTARDY Continued under former order. No. 1973 State vs Sam King No. 1979 State vs James Carr Nos. 1988 & 1989 State vs Wanda Jean Henderson No. 2050 State vs Atwell Ulysses Icenhour WNo. 2152 State vs John W. Lewis No. 2173 & 2174 State vs William Nicholson Mowbary Wo. 2186 State vs Robert McClelland SECOND WEEK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OCTOBER T Monday, October 2h, 1955. _ MAINTAINING COMMON LAW NUISANCE Defendant called and failed, and Capias Instanter,. LARCENY OF AUTO Alias Capias. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT: NO OPERATOR! Alias Capias. OR'S License DRIVING DRUNK Continued under former order, DRIVING DRUNK This case is removed from the docket, DRIVING DRUNK: DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED Alias Capias. FORGERY BY ENDORSEMENT Alias Capias. Judgment Nisi se; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK Monday, Aloe 2377 State willie James Black No. 2378 State vs Archie Duncan dio. 2391 State vs Ray J. Fesperman » Alo, 2392 State Vs Homer Shepherd, Jr. Ao. 2379 State vs James Cleo Bauguess Ao. 2303 State vs William Larry Charles Ao. 2376 State vs June Grant Alias p Charles Grant, Jr. OCTOBER TERM, 1955 October 24, 1955 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY A True Bill. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY A True Bill. MANSLAUGHTER A True Bill. BRIBERY A True Bill. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LAPRCEN A. Tene. Bii2. MURDER A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A GUN A True Bill. ies) Alias June Banks ef. ' Wo. 2380 No. 2198 BASTARDY | State State Continued under former order. . vs vs | “Seorge Lambert, Jr, George William Campbell | Alias Bull Lambert ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL A True Bill. . ad a] 7 ar ca | eed Mo. 725 BASTARDY ‘lo. 2405 MANSLAUGHTER Moo Ve State vs T. L. Nixon Alo. 2059 State vs Eugene Howell No. 2412 State vs Thomas Simpson Mo. 2411 State vs Samuel Yates Alexander No. 2413 State vs James Sipes Continued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Continued undr former order. ESCAPE A True Bill. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY A True Bill. MANSLAUGHTER A True Bill. State D VS td Ray Byers Mo, 2406 State v Clyde Kenneth Overcash do. 2407 State vs Jack Merril} Ingram | lo. 2108 State vs Jesse Willarg Parker . fio, 23 $5339 ' vs orge Edith Mayfield A True Bill. MANSLAUGHTER A True Bill. MANSLAUGHTER A True. Bill. MANSLAUGHTER A True Bill. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed. and Capias Instanter. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa Alo. 2197 State vs Clarence Houston Nos. 2204 & 2205 State vs Laura Mae Hunter No. 22h7 State vs James Lee Brown Mose 2254 & 2255 State vs Hennon James Johnson Ao. 2295 State vs Thomas Lee Lynch Mo. 2301 State vs Charles C. Smith “No. 2301 State vs Charles C. Smith No. 2316 State vs Amos Strange Alo. 232k State vs Lee Preston Myers No. 2328 State vs James Leroy Cowan Alo. 2333 State vs O*'Bryant Bingley Alo. 2334 State vs William Taladge Moore Wo. 2340 State vs Roy (NMN) Gregory SECOND WEEK IN THE SUPERIOR couRT OCTOBER T Monday, October 2i,, 1955 1955 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO- Defendant called and failed; jel — Guy and Capias Instanter. Sment Nisi i), POSSESSION 49% GALLONS NON-TAX PAID POSSESSION a GALLONS NON-TA QUOR: Continued. 7 i LIQUOR POR Sala ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KTuy Defendant called and failed. Jud and Capias Instanter. udement Nisi Sei BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Continued for defendant. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sei and Capias Instanter. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei and Capias Instanter. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant called and failed. and Capias Instanter. Judgment Nisi Seif DRIVING DRUNK Continued for defendant. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed. and Capias Instanter. Judgment Nisi Sei fa DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called ad failed. and Capias Instanter. Judgment Nisi Seif DRIVING DRUNK wisi Sei Defendant called and failed. and Capias Instanter. Judgment BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Nol Pros With Leave. = vs E ceorge Lambert, Jr F jlias Bull Lambert ' No, 2389 & 2390 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT iD WEEK OCTOBER TERM? 1955 SaO day, October 2h, 1955 MANSLAUGHTER S Ho, 2349 Continued for the term, State ' vs F velvin Leroy Jack ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL F Ho. 2380 Continued for the defendant. F State NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. F fos. 2381 & 2382 ' State - vs | colleen E, Lambert No. 238 SPEEDING pee Continued for te term. f vs | James Royle Davis RESISTING ARREST: PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS State Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa . vs and Capias Instanter. | Harold Eugene Sechler Pio. 2109 ACCESSORY TO MANSLAUGHTER - State Continued. a vs ' Harold J. Ramsuer E No. 2410 MANSLAUGHTER | State Continued. > vs F larry Lee Nesbit Bo, 2388 DRIVING DRUNK | The defendant enters a plea of guilty. B iets JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined to the common p ‘lyde Ralph Sharpe jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR (4) MONTHS g NV58 assigned to work under the aun st820n: 0 en q Highway and Public Works Commission. Judgmen iad upon payment of a fine of $100.00 and es payment of the sum of $20.00 to Junior Hartness for damages to his truck and upon payment of the cost. Otherwise to be in full force and effect. Moe 238L & 2385 |PRESENT ANOTHER'S OPERATOR'S LICENSE: DRIVING DRUNK — | The defendant enters a plea of guilty in both cases. e L (0 { JUDGMENT 2384, Judgment is suspended upon ~—— 0 ' CIw/antY) D. (Only) Daltonithe costs.’ 2385, Let the defendant pay a fine © 1$100.00 and costs. Ao. 2427 » %tate vs P Samue) Yates Alexander BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY lea of guilty of Breaking, The defendant enters a ple . 2 ier of oe { { as charge | om SUDGMENT let, the defendant be confined in'(3) nor penitentiary at Raleighfor not less than FIV more than SEVEN (7) . RT. & & Og Ie 5 TS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK OCTORER Monday, October 24, 1955 0 19%) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 24, 1955 No. 2321 State vs Lewis Jeantene Braswell w/M/22 No. 2412 State vs Thomas Simpson ANNos. 2386 & 2387 State vs Jesse Lee Ham W/M/32 dio. 2316 State vs Amos Strange c/M/76 Mo. 2272 State vs Hoyle Cleveland Whitlow W/M/3 4 NON-SUPPORT The defendant enters a plea of not Kos. 2367, a Jury sworn and impanelled and returma’”” . 2369, of guilty. Med a verd,, J state JUDGMENT, let the defendant = common jail of Iredell County z a mn the clegn Satth axa SIX (6) MONTHS assigned to work under et © B v/u/2 vision of the State Highway and Public ie a : Commission. This sentence is suspended ha period of FIVE (5) YEARS eS upon office of the Clerk deter tar Court of Tayi County the sum of $5.00 per week for the Support and maintenance of Ronnie Gunte paid to Rosa Lee Gunter Gryder tor tele a and maintenance. The first payment to be oot on Saturkhy, November 5, 1955 and each and ia week thereafter during term of suspension and upon payment of the costs. Otherwise to te in full force and effect upon motion of the Solicitr ESCAPE The defendant enters a plea of guilty, JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in th common iat of Iredell County for not less thar TWELVE (12) nor more than TWENTY-FOUR (21) MONTHS assigned to work under the superision 0’ the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence to commence at the expiration of sentence in #10421 from Wake County whichhe is now serving. SPEEDING AND RECKLESS DRIVING The defendant through his Attorney, Mr. John Lewis, enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and impanelled as follows: W. M. Perry J. K. Radford Sam Miller, Jr. Paul Ellis Dewey Saunders Arthur F. Kennedy L. A. Plyler Je T. Steele Jeet, oe Ed Speaks oe V. Knox B. He Stinson Grier F. Johnson The jury returned a verdict of guilty in both cases. Prod JUDGMENT, In #2386, let the defendant be — to the common jail of Iredell County for Aug of SIX (6) MONTHS assigned to work —. cats supervision of the State Highway and Puble : Commission. This judgment is suspended upc payment of a fine of $25.00 and costs. aint! In #2387, let the defendant be confined , common jail of Iredell County for & eth SIX (6) MONTHS, assigned to work uel supervision of the State Highway @ Works Commission. This judgment upon payment into the office of Cle as Court of the sum of $56.40 for the pre WG benefit of Bobby Lee Mclain, page into the and of the sum of $50.00 to be pat the use of office of Clerk Superior Court for of costs: 2 | James Tilley, and upon the payment ffect up ®. 2379 Otherwise to be in full force and e State motion of the Solicitor. , pm. Wh/i7 1° Bauguess ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON suit Harmon Turner, a witness §U ppoenaed for was called and failed to answer iyi SPEEDING seen Mrs oe The defendant through his oe in exces enters a plea of guilty te oR ape 55mph and not in excess of i JUDGMENT ,let the defendant p& and costs. om t rine of # 9139 gonorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, POSSESSION 120 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING 120 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED Defendant enters a plea of not guilt his Attorney, Mr. W. R. Battley. . ai Jury sworn and impanelled as follows: Jay Holton James D. Hartness Floyd B. Smith C. H. Smith R. T. Brantley L. B. Feimster C. M. Newton W. R. Hedrick E. P. Burdette Robert K. Kerr Fred Davis Dewey Saunders Jury returns a verdict of guilty in all the cases. JUDGMENT, In #2367, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, assigned to work under the supervBion of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. In #2368, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, assigned to work under supervision of the State Hsgehway dnd Public Works Commission. This ta Bane? {is to run concurrently with the sentence in #2367. In #2369, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THREE (3). MONTHS, assigned to work under the supervision of State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a period of THREE (3) MONTHS upon payment of a fine of $25.00 and costs. Otherwise to be in full force and effect on motion of Solicitor. This sentence is to commence at the expiration of the sentence in #2367 and #2368. In # 2370, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS on condition he pay a fine of $200.00 and cost. Otherwise to be in full force and effect on motion of the Solicitor. This sentence is to commence at the expiration of the sentence in # 2367, #2368 and 2369. . “- provided in G. S. 18-6, the Ford Automobile equipped with Cadillac motor in which the liquor in cases #2367 and 2368 was possessed and transported, was equipped and modified from its original manufac- tured condition so as to increase its speed. The Court finds that such equipment and modifications are So extensive that it would be impracticable to restore said vehicle to its original condition, therefore the Court orders that the 1951 Ford equipped with Cadillac motor be turned over to the Division #3, which is in the State Highway Patrol Div , jurisdiction of this Court, to be used in - performance of official duties only and am or other transportation or for re-sale other than a junk. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant, through his Attorney, enters a plea of guilty of larceny of goo an $100.00. 0 ee of the Court is that the dafondem De confined in the Common Jail of Iredell senna +e term of SIX (6) MONTHS, assigned to oe ao supervision of the State Highway and Fu e is Commission. This sentence is suspended. on op of TWO (2) YEARS and the defendant is Pp neato? He anccie probation under the supervisision of the 8 easel officer as #t out in the probation jud webs a ha condition of probation ordered by me $1000 cor aaeke defendant pay the costs at the rate © October 25, 1955 at Mr. Battley, ds valued at bux elle No. 2393 State vs David D. Pearson W/M/h4 No. 2394 State vs John Lee Witherspoon C/M/L4 No. 2396 State vs Roy L. Bost w/M/43 No. 2397 State vs Att Lee Davis w/M/59 No. 2395 State vs Chester C. Brooks W/M/3 1, State vs James Wesley Lowrance No. 2353 State vs Lake M. Shue No. 2398 State vs Lewis Brown W/M/31 Alo. 2402 State vs Eskell 0. Shoemaker W/M/1,5 “No. 2400 State vs Ralph Shelton Albea IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, October 25, 1955 : PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS The defendant enters a plea of JUDGMENT, is suspended upon bevel ment of the Costs, PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS The defendant, through his Attorne enters a plea of guilty. ¥» Mr. Morrow, JUDGMENT is suspended upon payment of the costs PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS The defendant, through his Attorney, Mr, enters a plea of guilty. rs aaeee, JUDGMENT is suspended upon payment of the costs, PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS The defendant, through his Attorney, Mr. Morrow enters a plea of guilty. JUDGMENT is suspended upon payment of the costs, DRUNK The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and impanelled and returned a verdict of guilty. JUDGMENT, let the defendant pay a fine of $10.0 and costs. SPEEDING The defendant through his Attorney Mr. Battley, enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and impanelled and returned a verdict of not guilty. DRIVING DRUNK (2nd OFFENSE) Continued. POSSESSION NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR FOR SALE ; rough his dant lea of not guilty,t Heeotge on ena et baneticd and returned a verdict of guilty. the JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined int (6) common jail of Iredell County for a term of oe th MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision State Highway and Public Works Commission. judgment is suspended upon payment of and remain of good behavior for THREE (3 this date and not violate any laws of the said period. Otherwise to be in full fore upon motion of the Solicitor. DRIVING DRUNK The defendant enters a plea of guilty. of $100.00 JUDGMENT, let the defendant pay a fine and the costs. DRIVING DRUNK’ ( 2nd OFFENSE) . The defendant outers peas of not guilty, me is Attorney, Mr. Grant Boimer. yerdi¢ Jury sworn and impanelled and returned 4 not guilty. throust IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, October 25, 1955 No» 22 50 state uid Jonathan Clark o/M/32 ho, 2251 State vs father Scott 0/M/32 Jo. 2381 State v8 Colleen E, Lambert W/F/22 Ho, 2382 State vs Colleen E, Lambert /F/22 Ho. 2301 tate vs Charles C Smith Hos. 2354, 2355 2356, 2357" state? 2357 fn vs charles C, Smith Jo, 2316 State vs Anos Strange Hos, 2 Sate? 230k & 2305 vs "dian Larry Charles ‘lo. 2306 State vs Homer B. Cashi on CRIME AGAINST NATURE (SODOMY) The defendant, through his Attorney, Mr. Mitchell enters a plea of guilty. . JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, assigned to work under the supervision of the State Hjghway and Public Works Commission, This judgment is suspended upon condition the defendant remain of good behavior and not violate any laws of the State. This judgment is suspended for a term of THREE (3) YEARS. The defendant is to pay the costs. Otherwise to be in full force and effect upon motion of the Solicitr. CRIME AGAINST NATURE (SODOMY) The defendant, through his Attorney, Mr. Battley, enters a plea of guilty. JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This judgment is suspended for a period of THREE (3) YEARS upon conditicn the defendant remain of good behavior and not violate any laws of the State and pay the costs. Otherwise to be in full férce and effect upon motion of the Solicitor. NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE The defendant, through her attorney, Mr. Mitchell enters a plea of guilty. JUDG MENT is suspended upon payment of the costs. DRIVING DRUNK The defendant, through her attorney, Mr. Mitchell enters a plea of guilty. JUDGMENT, let A. defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and costs. Judgment of Sci Fa heretofore entered, ordered striken out. DRIVING DRUNK Se Judgment of Sci Fa heretofore entered, ordere striken out. RESISTING ARREST: POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: DRIVING DRUNK: DRUNK a Judgment of Sci Fa heretofore entered, order striken out. Continued for term. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Judgment of Sci Fa heretofore entered, ordered striken out. Continued for the term. ILL: MURDER: ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO K ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT . Continued for the term. DRIVING DRUNK (2nd OFFENSE) This case is transferred to inactive docket. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, October 25, 1955 No. 2307 DRIVING DRUNK State Continued for the term. vs Leroy Watson Adams ( No. 2358 DRIVING DRUNK State Defendant called and failed. vs Fa and Capias Instanter. Benny Tilghman Rappe, Jr. Judgment Nis; Sei No. 2399 SPEEDING State Continued for the term. vs Paul Reed Haynes ! No. 2402 } DRIVING DRUNK State } Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi $¢; vs Fa and Capias Instanter. Eskell 0. Shoemaker No. 2103 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A PEICE OF Pips State Continued. vs Charles S. Grant { “No. 2404 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State Continued for the State. vs Cora Southers No. 2413 MANSLAUGHTER State Continued for the term. vs James Sipes CRAND JURY REPORT The Grand Jury found true bills of indictment in all bills presented to them by the Solicitor. The Grand Jury heard a report from the Welfare Department on its operations t The Grand Jury checked 6n its recommendation in the August 1955 term th the Solicitor of Iredell County Recorder's Court issue warrants for those ; the persons who have failed to list their properties for taxes and found that of original list of 380 names only 65 have at this date failed to list their ting properties. The Solicitor is planning to issue warrants for those not lis Grand on or before November 1, 1955. This Grand Jury recommends that the next Jury follow through and see that the above has been carried ute Willi “a oreman 0 see ee eR KR eK ee HH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------~--- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, October 25, 1955 fp OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT etat counTY OF IREDELL sure OF NORTH CAROLINA ' DOCKET NO. 2203 Vs t ORDER MODIFYING PROBATION WAX PARKER ! THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard, and being heard at the October 5 tern of the aforesaid Court, Honorable Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding, and IT APPEARING to the Court that the defendant, Max Parker, at the February 1955 Term of the aforesaid Court, entered a plea of guilty to Attempted Larceny sentenced to a term of twenty-four (24) months in jail to be assigned and was so work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, which sentence was suspended and the defendant placed on probation for a period of five (5) years under the supervision of the State Probation Commission and its officers and under the general conditions as set forth in the probation judgment and special condition in part as follows: "That he not operate an automobile for a period of two (2) years from this date." IT NOW APPEARING to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact upon affirmative testimony of the Probation Officer that it will work a hardship on the defendant, Max Parker, unless he is allowed to operate a motor vehicle for personal and business purposes. IT 13, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the special condition of the probation judgment be, and the same is modified to the extent "That the probationer shall have his driver's license returned and may operate a motor vehicle from this date." This the 20th day of October, 1955. J ee Kk Ke Ke we KK OK OK This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, October 26, 1955 at 9330 otclock A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Thursday, October 27, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, October 26, 1955 No. 2325 State vs Fannie Scott C/F/26 of Nolo Contendere. State of North Cfrolina. SE IS CE I ES One a ES ES No. 1973 State vs Continued under former order. Sam King MAINTAINING COMMON LAW NUISANCE costs. No. 2282 State TO KILL POSSESSION 1 GALLON NON-TAX PAID 1 The defendant, through her Attorneys /enters JUDGMENT, let the defendant b jail of Iredell County for a tern of Srna the conn, assigned to work under the supervision of 3 Highway and Public Works Commission the State This jukment is suspended for a term of Two YEARS upon payment of a fine of $50.00 and (2) upon further conditions that he remai a td behavior and not violate any of the la TQUORMr, ) MONTHS n of good ws of the Otherwise to b force and effect upon motion of the Solic in full citor, Defendant appeared and showed good behavior, It is ordered by the Court that the Judgment se: Pa heretofore entered be stricken out upon payment of the ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A PISTOL WITH Inta vs The defenuant, through his Attorney Mr. Battley Leon Norris Sharpe enters a plea of not guilty. c/M/26 moves for non-suit. No. 2108 j State } vs | James William Campbell | ASSAULT The State takes a Nol Pros. No. 2109 State vs James William Campbell w/M/29 ASSAULT ON FEMALE Carolina. upon motion of the Solicitor. No. 2315 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State The defendant, through his Attor At the close of the State's evidence the defendant Motion allowed and case dismissed, The defendant, through his Attorney, Mr. Ray Jennings enters a plea of guilty. JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS assigned to work under the supervis:0 of the State Hfzhway and Pyblic Works Commission. This judgement is suspended for a period of T¥0 (2) YEARS upon payment of the costs and upon further condition that he remain of good behavior and no violate any of the laws of the Sate of North Otherwise to be in full force and effect ney Mr. Battley " enters a plea of Nolo Contendere which plea the A. R. Robertson State accepts. JUDGMENT, let the defendant pay and costs. NO. 2332 State vs Frank Roosevelt Gilles C/M/22 r DRIVING DRUNK enters aplea of not guilty. Jury sworn and impanelled and guilty. JUDGMENT, let the defendant pay 4 f4 and costs. No. 2333 State vs O'Bryant Bingley C/M/29 DRIVING DRUNK The defendant, through his A enters a plea of guilty. and«costs. The defendant, through his Attorney Mr returned 4 verdic JUDGMENT, let! the defendant pay a fine of $25.0 Battley t, of ne of $100.00 It is ordered by the Court that the Judgement be stricken out. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. Lewis & Kp, 3 & plea No» 2323 State vs Foster Johnson w//2h to, 2377 State vs Willie James Black No, 2378 State vs Artis Duncan Nos. 2386 & 2387 State vs Jesse Lee Ham Nes. 2367 & 2368 State vs Glenn Smith Inscore Nos 2350 State vs fermit Lee Childers Yo, 23 tae’ MANUFACTURING LIQUOR The defendant, through his Attornevs Mr. M ; Mr. Battley, enters a plea of Nolo a . JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the State’ Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a period of TWO (2) YEARS upon payment of a fine of $100.00 and the costs and provided he remain of good behavior and does not : violate any of the laws of the State of North Carolina for said period. Otherwise to be in full force and effect upon motion of the solicitor. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of guilty. JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the State Penitentiary at Raleigh for a term of not less than EIGHT (8) nor more than TEN (10) YEARS. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and impanelled as follows: James D. Hartness L. 8. Feimster W. R. Hedrick E. P. Burdette Fred Davis Dewey Saunders Grier F. Johnson J. B. Harris W. M. Perry Arthur F. Kennedy Js i Radford es . Steele The Jury returned a verdict of guilty. JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the State Penitentiary at Raleigh for a term of not less than THREE (3) nor more than FIVE (5) YEARS. SPEEDING AND RECKLESS DRIVING It is ordered by the Court that the former judgment be stricken out. Consolidated for judgment. JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS to serve in County jail with authority to County Commissioners to work said prisoner on County property as they may need him and at any time he is not needed on County property Capias to issue by the Clerk Superior Court for the — service of the balance of his term under the sugrvision of the State Highway and Public Works Commision. POSSESSION 120 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSION 120 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Itis ordered by the Court that the former judgment be oe out. x a ‘ onsolidated for judgment. : : JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the oma jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (03), with authority to County Commissioners to work t : a frisoner on County property as they may see fit . ae they do not desire his services, the Clerk Super yl 4 is authorized to issue commitment for him to rhe ee under the supervision of the State Highway an . fares Works Commission for the service of the balance Oo BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The State takes a Nol Pros on the Breaking and Entering charges. The Larceny charge Court . is remanded to Mooresville Recorder's MANSLAUGHTER ters The defendant, through his Attorney Mr. McLaughlin en a plea of not guilty. defendant moves f the State's evidence the tor judy Dero Gen oaths Motion allowed and verdict of not guilty. DRIVING DRUNK Sei Fa Judgement stricken out. HT \ 3 | ees 5 J oR See hon © 4 ae 7d eer IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---~-.. OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Thursday, October 27, 1955 No. 2392 BRIBERY State The defend vs the crime of Homer Shepherd, Jr, c/M/28 INo. 2405,2406,2407, 2408] State f vs Ed Ray Byers Clyde Kenneth Overcash { Jack Merrill Ingram " Motion Jesse Willard Paker, Jr] Ingram allowed, i to each de “No. 2376 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON TO-WIT A GUN State The defendant enters a plea of not guilty, through vs his Attorney Mr, McLaughlin. June Grant Alias The defendant withdraws his Plea and pleads guilty Charles Grant, Jr. to Assault With Deadly Weapon. C/M/26 JUDGMENT, let the defendant pay a fine of $50,00 and the costs, 4NO. 2302 State vs BASTARDY The defmdant enters a plea of guilty. JUDGMENT, let the defendant be confined in the comm Herbert Alexander Gibson Jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONT W/M/ assigned to work under the Suprvision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, a This sentence is Supended on ayment into the office of the Clerk Superior Court of $200.00 to be paid to Elsie Jane Caldwell for the use and benefit of oo Sue Caldwell: and $125.00 for Doctor’ skHospital's Bills, to be in full and final Settlement for the — and maintenance of said child by the ee . upon payment of the cost. Said sums to be paid or before October 28, 1955. ee a So ! ! ! { : ( ! ! ! i Alo. 2308 State vs Arthur J, Wooten DRIVING DRUNK Continued, ‘fo. 2322 ! DRIVING DRUNK State 4 j { v Continued, Richard Davidson Little Mio. 2363 FAIL TOHAVE DOGS VACINATED State Continued, vs John Glaspy 1955 ber 31, +7 This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Moming, Octo at 10:00 O'clock A. M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK --~----- OCTOBER TERM, 1055 Monday, October 31, 1955 Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday, This per 27, 1955, at 10:00 o'clock A. M, to : C. Rumple, Htgh Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open court Je ° 9 - f the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for the names 0 hird week of the October term, 1955 Iredell] County Superior Court, this the t to-wit: Sates H. R. Benfield Homer B, Tolbert Be L. ste Royce T. Shoemaker Je J. Hall W. Lem Brown J, Le Harmon Rochell M. Brown Re. P. Cook i. Ce Christie Willie L. Houpe Mrs. Fleta A. Teague ¢, M. Sherrill Matthew J. Amon R. E. Lafoy Mitchel] C. Pharr R. D. Christopher John E. Flowers C, E. Dagenhart William C. Murdock Robert E. Mackey Felix Alexander H. A. Barnard O. H. Davis J, W. Little John D. Ford Billy E. Ervin Mrs. J. W. Nash William A. Stroud Mrs. Elizabeth A, Bryant Carl C, Axley J. W. Brannon J. B. Renegar A. 1, Hollingsworth, Sr, C. C. Mizell T. He. McAdams i. P, Cook and Mrs. J. Ww, Nash were excused by Doctorts Certificates, Christie is in Lincoln County, not served. Christopher, J. W. Little, and Carl Cc. Axley excused by Court. Mizell is out of State, not served, The following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1, to-wit: tL. Estes H. R. Benfield Homer B. Tolbert Boyce T, Shoemaker J. J. Rall W. Lem Brown " L. Harmon Rochell M. Brown Willie L. Houpe "t. Fleta A. Teague C. M. Sherrill R. E, Lafoy | iy 4 Be Be tJ Pay . ae / a ae a y é ‘a i oid May) } ; 4 ; ue Fe A the A ee , ue | 4 : Te Fi ee aon! i ' ; but ry rt , it ah ih : a | Hy ri an : Hi | a nat! ; i i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT oe. ater a 1955 46137 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. COUNTY OF IREDELL ) Peggy Carrigan Neds -vs- John Glasgow, Defendant. 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolin for six months immediately preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes. 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next immediately preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. COUNTY OF IREDELL Peggy Car. igan Glasgow Plaintiff JUDGMENT -Vvs- OF John Glasgow, DIVORCE Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and heing heard before his Haor, Judge Hubert E. Olive, and a dry, at the October Term, 1955, of Iredell County Superior Court, the following issues were submitted to and found by the Jury l. Were the plaatiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in ti Complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolin for six months next immediately preceding the bringingof this action, 4 in the Complaint? Answer: Yes, + from each other 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apar ‘is g of for two years next preceding the bringhg of this action, and the filin Complaint, as aleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes, $ allege? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ------ OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 31, 1955 It 18 THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for the 9 plaintiff, ORD ing between the plaintiff and defmdant,be, and the same are, hereby dissolved; FRED, CONSIDERED and ADJUDGED, that the bonds of matrimony now exist hat the defendant remain in the custody and control of the two children of said { 4 plaintiff and defendant, and that the plaintiff be, and she is, hereby granted an jpsolute div It IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, to orce from the defendant. be taxed by the Clerk. Hubert E. Olive Presiding Judge. statesville, Ne C. ctober 31st, 1955. kk ek KK OK KK KOK 6113 state OF NORTH CARDINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. COUNTY OF IREDELL San Tate Plaintiff -VS- lois Tate Defendant. ) l, Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in the Compalint ? inswers Yes, ’, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the bringing of this action? inswer: Yes, , Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for + ‘ ? ‘or two years next immediately preceding the bringing of this action‘ inswer; Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ------ OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 31, 1955 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL Sam Tate Plaintiff -VS- Lois Tate Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, Judy Rubert E. Olive, and a Jury, at the October Term, 1955, of Iredell County Superior Court, the following issues were submitted to and found by the Jury, 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in th Complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolin for six months next immediately preceding the bringing of this action, as allezi in the Compdaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next peceding the bringing of this action, and the filing of this Complaint, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. IT IS, PHEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for the plaintiff, ORDERED, CONSIDERED and ADJUDGED, that the bonds of matrimony nov existing between the plaintiff and defendant, be, and the same are, hereby dissolved; that the defendant remain in the custody and control of the three children of plaintiff and defendant, and that the plaintiff be, and he is, herey granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, Hubert. E. Olive residing Judges to be taxed by the Clerk. Statesville, N. C. October 3lst, 1955. we we ek ke ok ok me ee eH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Monday, October 31, 1955 #139 yaa CAROLINA rggDELL COUNTY sggcy JUANITA HODGE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff poe JUDGMENT AS OF NON-SUIT sg0RGE WILLIAM HODGE, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and behg heard before the undersigned residing Judge; and it appearing to the court from the statement of Scott, tollier and Nash, attorneys for the Plaintiff, and from the answer filed by the Defendant that there is no ground for divorce as alleged in the complaint and that the Plaintiff, through her counsel of record, desires that the action be dismissed; It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the action be and the same is hereby, dismissed and that the Plaintiff be taxed with the cost of this action. THIS 31st DAY OF OCTOBER, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESDING T his Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, at 9330 ot Clock A. M, November 1, 1955 duis ae re eee H -<-------- OCTOBER T Tuesday, November 1, 1955 ae 146150 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR coypr IREDELL COUNTY OCTOBER TERM Hubert Barkley, Plaintiff Martha Jean Barkley, Defendant 1. Where the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complain: Answer. Yes. 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. YeS-e 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY OCTOBER TikM Hubert Barkley, Plaintiff -VvSs- JUDGMENT fartha Jean Barkley, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell Guperior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the Plaintiff and against tn Defendant as appears in the record; It is, therefore, ORDERED, GONSIDERED AND ADJUDGED that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and Defendant be, and the te same are hereby dissolved and set aside and the Plaintiff is granted an absoli divorce from the Defendant. It is further ordered that the Plaintiff pay the costs of this action Hubert_E. Olive udge Presiding Kee Kk KK KR Kk KK KR eK KK OH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, November 1, 1955 66 ‘a CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT sREDELL COUNTY ul Julia Ha’"s praintiff VSe Hall, Ralph Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, dubert BE. Olive, Judge Presiding at the October Term, 1955, of the Superior court of Iredell County; And it appearing to the Court that this action was commenced upon complaint of Julia Hall for support of Renee Alberta Hall, alleged minor child of parties herein, under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, filed in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court, Iredell County on May 6, 195,, and that summons was issued on said date; And it further appearing to the Court that no general or testimentary ecuardian or dulv appointed next friend represents the said Renee Alberta Hall, the real party in interest, but that actionwas ‘commenced in the name of Julia Hall as aforesaid, and that therefore there is a fatal defect of parties plaintiff's IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff Julia Hall recover nothing of the defendant Ralph Hall, and that her action be and is hereby dismissed, and that the plaintiff be taxed with the costs of this action, This the lst day of Navember, 1955. Hubert _E. Olive Judge Presiding kek kk Ke KR KK me OK Ke OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, November 1, 1955 INo. 5862 NORTH CAROLINA ve HE SUPERIOR ¢ IREDELL COUNTY OURT Clydene Nagel, Plaintiff -vs- JUDGMENT Lawrence E. Nagel, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned upon the complaint of Clydene Nagel for support under the Uniform Reeiproca) Enforcement of Support Act and her depositions of testimony and upon answer and testimony of defendant, Lawrence E. Nagel; And it appearing to the court from the evidence that the parties hereiy voluntarily separated as evidenced by a contract and agreement between ther dated ApriVll, 1953, and acknowledged before the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on April, 18, 1953, wherein said Clydene Nagel was privately examined and it was found by th said Clerk that the said contract and agreener: was not unreasonable or injurious to her$ And it futher appearing to the court that subsequent to the said contrat and agreement the said Clydene Nagel left the State of North Carolina where the parties lad heretofore lived of her own accord and that by reason of the mutual agreement of the parties to separate there was no abandonment on the part of the defendant and that plaintiff is not entitled to the relief demanded in her complaint; It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, Clydene Nagel, recover nothing of the defendant, Lawrence E. Nagel, and hat her action be and is hereby dismissed and that the plaintiff be taxed vit the cost of this action. This lst day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive —— KKK KKK Re KR ew Ke OK KF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK --~--~~- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, November 1, 1955 yORTH Her cAROLINA in the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY October 31, 1955, Term en wae Hendrens . sntiff, is JUDGMENT , Hendren WB Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before ilis Honor, tybert BE. Olive, ,Judge Presidhg, and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff desires to take a non-suit in the matter, all matters and things arising on the pleadings having been compromised and settled: It is therefore, on motion of Attorney for plaintiff, ordered and adjudged by the Court that all matters and things arising on the pleadings having been compromised and settled by the execution of the deed of separation, this judgment shall be and constitute an estoppal of any future claim of the plaintiff against the defendant, and shall be binding upon her heirs and assigns and administrators. It is further ordered and adjudged by the court that this cause be the same is hereby dismissed and non-suited, and plaintiff is taxed with costs of the action. This the lst day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive dudge Presiding Keke Kk eK KK KK OK OK OK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ------- OCTOBER Terry Tuesday, November a5 1955" 1955 INo. 5862 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SuPERT IREDELL COUNTY SUPERIOR couRT Clydene Nagel, Plaintiff Lawrence E. Nagel, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersi snes upon the complaint of Clydene Nagel for Support under the Uniform Ratton Enforcement of Support Act and her depesitions of testimony and upon ansyer and testimony of defendant, Lawrence E. Nagel; And it appearing to the court from the evidence that the parties hei: voluntarily separated as evidenced by a contract and agreement between ther dated ApriYll, 1953, and acknowledged before the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on April, 18, 1953, wherein said Clydene Nagel was privately examined and it was found by th said Clerk that the said contract and agree was not unreasonable or injurious to her; and agreement the said Clydene Nagel left the State of North Carolina where the parties lad heretofore lived of her own accord and that by reason of the mutual agreement of the parties to separate there was no abandonment on tl part of the defendant and that plaintiff is not entitled to the relief demanded in her complaint; It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, Clydene Nagel, recover nothing of the defendant, Lawrence £. Nagel, and bat her action be and is hereby dismissed and that the plaintiff be tare ¥ the cost of this action. This lst dav of November, 1955, se E. oo ee kK Ke ee ee KR ke kk OH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ------ OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, November 1, 1955 877 Wath CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY In the Superior Court October 31, 1955, Term Hendren mm Plaintiff, vs dei Hendren, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Hubert E. Olive,,Judge Presidhg, and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff desires to take a non-suit in the matter, all matters and things arising on the pleadings having been compromised and settled: It is therefore, on motion of Attorney for plaintiff, ordered and adjudged by the Court that all matters and things arising on the pleadings having been compromised and settled by the execution of the deed of separation, this judgment shall be and constitute an estoppal of any future claim of the plaintiff against the defendant, and shall be binding upon her heirs and assigns and administrators. It is further ordered and adjudged by the court that this cause be the same is hereby dismissed and non-suited, and plaintiff is taxed with costs of the action. This the lst day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding a ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR couRT THIRD WEEK OCTOBE Tuesday, November 1 GERM. 1955 ff NORTH CAROLINA, | IREDELL COUNTY, | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ’ OCTOBER 3187... 1955, Tey Jimmie Shuford, by and through his next Friend, John Shuford, Plaintiff, Ross Lowthorpe, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that th¢plaintirs desires to take a voluntary non suit against the defendant, and that the defendant desies to take a voluntary non suit on his alleged cause of action against the plaintiff; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the cause of action alleged by the plaintiff against the defendant be, and the same is her- Dy non suited ad dismissed, and the alleged cause of action of the defendant against the plaintiff alleged in the answer be, and the same is hereby non Suited and dismissed, It is further adjudged by the Court that plaintiff be taxed with the costs of this action. This November lst, 1955. Hubert E, Olive Judge Presiding CPMSEMTED TO: R. A. Hedrick Attorney for Plaintiff J. G. Lewis Attorney for Defendant Ke Ke KK wR ee KR KK Ke : No. 6032 RR ee OR ee ee Seas pela fa a See a im the defendant, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEKK OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Tuesday, November 1, 1955 Jury sworn and impanelled as follows: Mitchell C. Pharr John E. Flowers vatthew J. Amon c, E. Dagenhart William C. Murdock Robert E. Mackey 4, A. Barnard O. H. Davis John D. Ford NORTH @ROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Katherine Davis, Plaintiff VS Milton Clary, Defendant 1, Was the damage to plaintiff's automobile caused by the negligence of defendant, as alleged in the complant? ANSWER; Yes, é. Did the driver of the plaintiff's automobile contribute to its damage, as in the answer? No, 3, What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant? ANSWER: $200.00 NORTH CAROLINA é IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Katherine Davis, Plaintiff YS. JUDGMENT “lton Clary, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding and a jury at the October, 1955 term of the Superior ourt of Iredell] County, and a jury having answered the issues submitted to them a8 follows: 1. Was the damage to plaintiff's automobile cuased by the negligence of as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes ¢. Did the driver of the plaintiff's automobile contribute to its da mage, as alleged in the answer? ANSWER g No, t 3+ What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from he *SWER $200.00 Now aintiff have : therefore, it is ordemi, adjudged, and decreed that the pl an rs * recover Of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred and No/100 ($200.00) Dolla IN THE SUPERIOR couR? THIRD WEEK -~----~ OCTOBER TERM, 1 Tuesday, November 1, 1955 ° 955 and the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk This thelst day of November, 1955, pabert Ee Olive 6050 Jury sworn and impanelled as follows: Estes H. R. Benfield Homer B, Tolbert “ a rt Harmon Rochell M. Brown J. By Renegar Hollingsworth, Sr. C. M. Sherrill R. E. Lafoy if i ender 4’ This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, er at 9:30 o'clock A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ------- OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, November 2, 1955 Ho. 6050 NORTE CAROLINA ig te | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY hrough Walter Gene Holleman, by and t ig } Friend, Fred G. Chamblee edn: Plaintiff, vs Yada Dean Coulter and Ruby Irene Aiken, Defendant, 1, Was the plaintiff injured and his property damaged by the negligence of Vada Dean Coulter? Answer: Yes. 2, Was the plaintiff injured and his property damaged ly the negligence of the defendant, Ruby Irene Aiken? Answer: Yes. 3. What amount of damages is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants or either of them? Answer; Property $200.00 Personal $500.00 SN AIEURAR A ane Seo Se USA IN THE SUPERI THIRD WEEK -----.. Wednesday, OR COURT OCTORER TERM November 2, 1955 » 1955 Noe 2315 State vs A. R. Robertson ASSAULT WITH DEADLY weapon It is ordered by the Court be stricken out, vir hat the former ie, JUDGMENT, let the defendant be eo - of Iredell County for g Signed to work u the State Highway and Public Nos. 2384 & 2385 State vs és L. (Only) D. (Only) Dalto PRESENT ANOTHER'S OPERATOR'S 1 9 tre « DRIVING DRUNK > BICENSE AS His oy, It is ordered by the Court t he stricken Out, and these cacen eee eetee JUDGMENT, let the defendant common jail of Iredel (4) MONTHS, ass of the State Hi ‘ +e eer judge S Consolidated ty, ;, be Confined in ti, 1 County for a term of POR igned to work onderethe Supervise ghway and Public Works Commission, ee Gehman nee eee Noe 2323 State vs Foster Johnson MANUFACTURING LIQUOR It appearing that the truck in this case was ‘ Orderd held by the Court from which the case was appea 1 lei but it further appearing to this Court that there x no evidence whatever that the truck either transportedor had anv intoxicating liquors in it, The Sheriff is hereby ordered to release the truck to the defendant, Foster Johnson, upon payment of Storage charges or other expenses pertaining to it, a ee xe k & ste oe Wo. 593! rauline Grvder vs Donald Gryder Coes . . tne The defendant demurs Oratenus to the complaint in thatthe complaint o $ 4s Su i not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and demurer 1s m : ° ° ° p “ “ a ; complaist The Ceurt in its discretion allows the plaintiff ten days to amend their cm ; : nd the ca and defendant allowed ten days thereafter to file answer to demurrer, 4 * hort + , ; e Novenve! 1S set pre-emptorily for trial on Monday of the week of th December, 1955 term. : ; ; ‘. in the cas The above is without prejudice to the order of pendinte lite . ® . £ ause. And the same is retained until final determination of this ¢ ek kK K “ee te & 4050 tae CAROLINA IREDELL IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ----~---- OCTOBER TE Wednesday, November 2, 1955 " IN COUNTY walter Gene Holleman, by and through 's Next Friend, Frea G. Chamblee, Plaintiff, JU Piyaia Dean Coulter and Ruby Irene Aiken, This cause | Presiding at the "and being heard, Ww + Was Defendants, coming on to October 1955 and the jury the plaintiff injured WVada Dean Coulter? Answers Yes, Was Answer: 3. What amount of damages is etecover i a Osts of This the 2nd day of November, ; Jpon the Coming i t the et endant moves the ¢C a appeal Defendant allowed 40 laint; Ppea) h - the plaintiff injured and his property damace pdefendant, Ruby Irene Aiken? Yes. per either of them? Troperty $200.00, Personal $500.00 therefore the sum of $700.00 from the this action to be taxed by the Clerk. 1955. n of the verdict the defendant, Same aside and for a new trial. Motion denied Ourt to set the verdict aside for Motion denied and defendant excepts, and in . g vO the Supreme Court. f allowed 60 days rT THE SUI a Nore Ui Term of Superior Court of Iredell having answered the Issues submitted t and his property damaged by J the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defend » ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff -ERIOR COURT ™™ "USN be heard before His Honor Hubert 3. Olive, Judge T County and a Jury, © it as follow the neglirence of by the negligence of the ants have and defendants or either of them together with the r 4@ Hubert Olive Judge Presiding Vada Dean Coulter, moves to and defendant excepts. errors assigned and to be open Court gives notice davs in which to prepare and serve case on appeal and thereafter in which to file exceptions or counter case. Ond in the Sum of $100.00 adjudged to be sufficient. Hubert E, Oliv Judge Presiding Ss IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK ----~-. OCTOBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, November 2, 1955 AIORTH CAROLINA 1 7 ‘ 1 HE SUPE IREDELL COUNTY ‘& SUPERIOR coypr Walter Gene Holleman, nis Next Friend, Fred by and through G. Chamblee, Plaintiff, vs ORDER Vada Dean Coulter ani Ruby Irene Aiken, Defendants, It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff, Walter Gene Hollenan, is, minor, 20 years and 8 months old and that the firm of McLaughlin and Batt)ey were employed in this case on a contingent basis and it appearing to the Coy that McLaughlin and Rattley, as attorneys for the minor, Walter Gene Holler:- = rendered substantial services in prosecuting this action to judgment and tha they are entitled to compensation for their services: and it appearing that the minimum fee scale prevailing in Iredell County, North Carolina, is 3}-1/)4 of the recovery had: It is ordered that the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County dishurs the sum of $700.00 as follows: $466.67 to Walter Gene Holleman to reimburse him for property damages and medical expenses and $233.33, to McLaughlin ani Battley, Attorneys. This the 2nd dav of November, 1955, Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding 446160 NORTH CAROLIN IREDELL COUNTY Mary Jane Barnes Shumake, Plaintiff, vs ORDER Ernest C, Shumake, Jr., Defendant, ™, 4 Judge This caus e coming on to be heard by His Honor Hubert E. Olive, : n the Presiding at the October Term 1955 of Iredell County Superior Court upp nee for Barnes Shumake for maintenance and subsiste ng the pendes! application of Mary Jane herself and two minor children and for wasonable counsel fee duri of this action; b é el for * And the Court finds from statements of W. R» Battley of couns this jes to Haintiff and J. G. Lewis, he rt Attorney for the defendant, that the Pa t ssion of action have agreed that the plaintiff shall have exclusive posse rhe d n she 4 home at 309 West Gray Street, Mooresville, North Carolina, wherel ‘ ‘ ann ha minor children of the parties shall reside, that the plaintiff $ a » of this action and to defray the proper and necessary expenses | beginning November, 1955, the sum of $75.00 for te Support % after during the pendency of this action that the defendant furnish im Ninor children & Bae a P: < IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THIRD WEEK --------- OCTOBER TERM, Wednesday, November 2, 1955 1955 possession and exclusive use of the 1955 Chevrolet automobile, title to which is H .. the name of the defendant, that the defendant will furnish all necessary fuel aik ‘ : 4uU of] for heating said dwelling and will pay to the plaintiff the sum of $75.00 per gonth on or before the 10th day of each calendar month with the lst payment beginning Wied i. . with November, 1955, and the defendant will furnish the Plaintiff with $10.00 worth of groceries, figured on wholesale prices, per week: and it appearing to the Court that the parties have agreed that the defendant shall have the right to have the children visit him at least one day per week and for longer periods during the rs a ‘ . A > summer months and if and when said children enter school thev Shall be sent to school in North Carolina and the plaintiff shall not take said children out of North Carolina except for visits$; and it further appearing and the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff has not su*ficient means to subsist during the prosecuting thereof, It is, therefore,by consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed: 1. That the defendant, Ernest C. Shumake, Jr., pay into the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on or before the 10th day of each month, and maintenance of his wife and two minor children during the pendency of this action. ¢. That starting with the week of October 3lst and each calendar week there-- to the plaintiff 710.00 worth of groceries at wholesale price. 36 That the plaintiff shall have the exclusive possession and right to occupy the dwelling belonging to the parties. % Fi 4. That the plaintiff shall have thepossession and exelusive ict » +755 Chevrolet beloneing te the parties, That the defendant Shall furnish all necessary fuel oil for heating the That the plaintiff shall have she care, custody and control o namely: Stephen Barnes Shumake and Lorna Shumake and that the def, > : . $o4 hi *ndant, Ernest C. Shumake, shal] have the right to have said children visit him at tf, least once each week and for longer periods during the summer months and if and When : : ai 24 J N Said Children are Placed in school, they shall be placed in a school in North “arolina, ~ fe That ‘orth Carolina 8, the plaintirr shall not take said children out of the State of except for visits or short durations. That the defendant shall pay to McLaughlin and Battley, Attorneys for ‘he plaintige the sum of $100.00 as attorneys fee. ™ Payments herein ordered and the other matters herein specified shall Cont iny . . nue during the pendency of this action or until the further order of the Court raven an THE SUPERIOR court WEEK -------— OCTOBER ‘TE wednesday, November <; 1955. 1993 This cause is retained for further orders and decreeg o This the 2nd day of November, 1955, Hubert E, 0); Judge residine By consent of: MCLAUGHLIN and BATTLEY Bys W. R, Attorneys ntiff J. G. Lewis Attorney for Defendant. Elizabeth C. Campbell Vs Hugh J. Campbell] ~-------nnemeeenee Contin Je K. Glenn, Je He Glenn, Jre, n, V. E. Bennett, & Ve ve Pennett T/A Quality Oil n rt Vs Vance McLean ---- | Margaret M. Thomas Vs Lawrence A, Sample-Winters Implement Co. Vs & M. Cloaninger & mn Qn [. Roy Hoover T - H Implement oo ww www onoon (ont init Calvin C. Compton Vs J. F. Curtis Harriet L. Curtis- Contin Thi : This Honorable Court is adjourned sine-die. Bo 1#6) ¥612h NORTH CAROLINA 1REDELL COUNTY Compton, Calvin C. s wae Claimant VSe 1, F, Curtis and wife, Harriet L Curtis, Owners, : . : Oya ee and Aw E. Gray and wife Rachel Jenkins Grav, Mortgagees THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard and being heard hefore the undersigned, J n the Clerk of the Superior Court, of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel for the plai 2 ? the matters and things in controversy between the plaintiff and have been settled and agreed upon, and that the plaintiff desires non-suit of the action pending against the defendant. T 1S, THEREFORE, considered, ordered, adiudzed and decreed he, and he herehy is, allowed tc take a voluntary non-sui the defendant, and it is further considered and adjudged that all of liens, heretofore the plaintiff azainst the defendant, he cancelled declared to be null and j @ that all the matters and things arising ou or because of anv of the matters and thinzs mentioned in the plaintiff's he and the same hereby are non-suited, cancelled and adjudged This 19th day of Octoher, 1955 Vv e Yar UW faan W NUNIA VAROLINA IREDELL conyry IN THE SUPERIOR, COURT ATLUBL COUNT y vAROLINA MOTOR COMPANY nme @ = . riaintiff ale JUDGMENT AS OF NON-SUIT Narrn = a JAVID HUGH WALKER, Defendant ~~ ee eere Tht a j ss a ; . hoa es j nd “iS Cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned a ++ t t appears ; Dv sae i ,borneys Ppearing to the court from the statement of Scott, Collier and Nash, Atsor o . . 3 has paid to the plaintiff ; he sum, um HINDRED TWENTY AND 60/100 demanded in the complaint herein, to wit, ONE HUNDRED TWENTY AND / h aa ‘ ne Plaintiff, that the defendant, David Hugh Walker, ($109 . : “u's \ 120,60) DOLLARS, together with the costs of said action and that in consideration Of the said Payment, plaintiff has released to defendant the property claimed therein and that by reason of said payment. and release of said property, all matters and ths Nings in ‘ontroversy have been thereby settled. It is, therefere, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action be, and the a hereby non-=suited, T + his 31st day of October, 1955. ED To; Collier a > nd Nash "8 for Plainti¢r Nash C. Ge Smiti ‘Terk. of Superior Vourt ..,.,;, eee kK ee ke ee “ er ed iia cb3) Y6062 NORTH CAROLINA SREDELL COUNTY Charles VSe Harry Wicker Thi us coming on to be hee hefore hi , his caus e coming o ard hefore his honor, C, G. Smith, Chey Superior Court, and it appearing that all matters and controverses have he settled. It is therefore, on motion of Z. V. Turlington, Attorney for the plaintiff, ordered, and adjudged that this action he and the same is non-suited. NORTH CAROLINA 1N THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Pre Rez Shell, rlaintiff, VS. JUDGMENT noger J. Foster and wife, Juanita L. Foster, befendants, "HIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Ue G. Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appears to the Court from the statement of counsel that all matters of controversy s# out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendants have agreed to pay to the plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed vo accept the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-Twe and 55/100 ($262.55) Dollars - , , . that it the cost of this action in full accord and satisfaction thereof; and . t ghall 0 has been agreed that execution against the defendants on this judgmen issue for a period of ninety (90) days from the date hereof} ' eed, that NOW, THEREFORE, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decree, T dred the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of Two Hun : n to be 4 eAefendants from the Of vixty-Two and 55/100 ($262.55) Dollars and the cost of this actio by the Clerk; and it is further ordered that execution against th a aa 8 On this judgement shall not issue for a period of ninety (90) day hereof, This 1l day of November, 1955. 6.) S Clerk of oupator Consent: Fred G. Chamblee Attorney for the P aintiff LAND, SOWEKS, AND AVERY By: Neil S, yowers Attorney for the Defendants eke KK KK Ke KK OK BP yepELL COUNTY E daisy M. Horrington, P tothe court that this is an action for a sum certain, to wit: © November yORTH CAROLIN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT punch Furniture Company, Inc. Plaintiff VSe Defendant n Je This cause coming on to be heard and being heard thefore his donor, C, ‘smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing $404.48, and for © the possession of certain articles of personal property in order that the same may "be sold as provided for by law and the sale price, after paying the costs of the ‘sale, be applied to the indebtedness and any surplus, if any after paying the costs | of this action, to be paid to the defendant and it further appearing to the court that the defendant has been properly served with summons and is now properly in court and has not answered or demurred or otherwise filed pleadings within the time allowed by law and that the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment and for the "relief sought in the petition. It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover ke at Ba 0 the defendant the sum of $404.48 with interest thereon, from the 15th day of 1955, and for the possession of the personal property described in the p Petition, and that Neil S. Sowers be and is hereby appointed commissioner for the = Purpose of selling said personal property and apply the proceeds from the said sale to the said indebtedness, after advertising the same at the court house door 2 three other public places in Iredell County, North Carolina for a period of 6 '2 (10) days Preceding the sale, and that the commissioner report to the clerk “Ss Teceipts and disbursements from the said sale as is required by law. This the 15th day of November, 1955. Ce Ge Smith Clerk of Superior Court eR RR KR Kk Re kk Re Rk OK Kk Ok 1#4381 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR y! COUNTY OF IREDELL COURT W. Me Norman, Trading as Mooresville Products Company, Plaintiff, - v8 - CONSENT JUDGMENT Mooresville Cotton Mills, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Ue. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statements of counsel that all matters j, controversy set out in the pleadings have been avreed Upon between the partic: as follows: 1. The defendant has agreed to the dismissal of its Counter-clain acains, the plaintiff. The defendant has agreed to pay to plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of $4,500.00, without interest, in full accord and satisfaction of plaintiff's claim arainst defendant. Plaintiff and defendant have arreed to each pay one-half of the court costs and the costs incident to the reference of the above-entitle matter, said costs being as follows: Mabel Moysey, Commissioner for adverse examination, paid by , Norman § ful We Me Alex Norman, Court Keporter for reference Bill of Costs, Clerk of Superior Court si ee to Hon. A. B. Kaymer, Referee Sail Al and 4. Each party shall pay its own attorney's fees, its own witness fees @ ose all other costs and expenses incident to the above-entitled action except th above listed. t . Cour’ 5« Each party has heretofore deposited with the Clerk of Superior of lredell County, the sum of $500.00, to cover the costs of this action, f : ement ° After the payment of the above-listed expenses, including the reinbure mmissioner, divided the $84.20 advanced by W. M. Norman for fee of Mabel Moysey, CO balance of $342.83 on hand with the Clerk of Superior Court shall be equally between the parties. eed that NOW, THEREFORE, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged a pert without 1" aed; ott ; the cel Plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $4,500.00, that the counter-claim of the defendant against the plaintiff be diet the costs of this action be divided equally between the plaintiff and and that any excess fundgin the hands of the Clerk after payment ae equally between plaintiff and defendant. This 15 day of November, 1955. Consented to: CANSLER AND CANSL&k By_ Cansler & Cansler We. M. Norman Attorneys for Pal neil? Plaintiff ee em me we mm Ho. Goodnight 5 - Goodnight Poultry Farm, = Settled + be df { JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Mpsse F r ipicht 7. Barke FALL TERM, 1955 . V8e a Engineer ing Company, No. 379 Iredell County. 16 Mpcorporated, and George ©. Wetherford This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion ‘that there is error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. It is therefore considered and aljudged by the Court here that the opinion of ie Court, as delivered by the Honorable Jeff D. Johnson Justice, be certified to B the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS REVERSED ‘ind it is considered and adjudged further, that the defendant do pay the costs of ‘the appeal in this Court incurred, to wit, the sum of Sixty-eight and 25/100 dollars 168.25), and execution issue therefor, A TRUE COPY Adrian J. Newton Clerk of the Supreme Court. eee ee ee we ke ke mk ke ke Ke & TH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT DELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK e tesville Flour Mills Company, ; Plaintiff vs Clyde Goodnight oodnight, trading ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT ) Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior y mt and it *ppearing to the court that plaintiff and defendants have compromised ) all matters and differences between them and that they have agreed that k sult should be entered and defendants shall pay the cost. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the action be, and it is 8 uited and defendants are taxed with the cost of this action. C.. e oooh ictal tninataroeetaisietadeinne ‘eek eee ee ee ek ee 436 14602 po 617) CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court ponte P OUNTY. IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK IREDELL VSe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK Statesville Flour Mills Company, JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Plaintiff Stugene — wife, vs JUDGMENT OF NON-sUIT | fely S» Kerley H. W. Goodnight, This cause coming on to be heard before Hon. C. G. Smith, Clerk of Defendant ; Santee Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the : h to ha b fully settled and This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk Of Superior _ Court SY man SST ec Ens the Parties: here or een ae : m f by th t of * Court and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff and defendant have cc. | adjusted PEP MPNEToy,, PETAR eT: CoRNNI Se thereer by the paynen 43 «58 : laintiff, and whereby all parties hereto have promised and settled all matters and differences between them and that they hare ; by the defendants herein to the pla ’ y : ll each other from any and all claims, actions, agreed that a non suit should be entered and defendant shall pay the cost, | discharged and released in full e C E and dama es ast present or pyr Ospective in connection Et is therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DE REED that the action be, and it iy : pienands, es of action, . 6 ; P : ' ' non j f ; 0 ° a dwelling house by the plaintiff for the defendants near Mooresville, North Carolina, and now occupied by the defendants. C. i Smith CLERE , It is therefore, ordered, on motion of Hugh G. Mitchell, attorney for the Re ARR DS OHO Oo | plaintire, that a judgment of non-suit be and is hereby entered in the above 445983 NORTH CAROLINA, ‘ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. } OCTOBER 31ST. 1955, TERM. F entitled action. This the 23rd day of November, 1955. C. G. Smith Jimmie Shuford, by and through ae a oe eee his next Friend, John Shuford, Plaintiff, , Consented to: 4 Ross Lowthorpe, Defendant. | Vs. j JUDGMENT Hugh G. Mitchell ! | ‘torney for Plaintit? William R, Pope = Mttorney for Defendants oe This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Suet 5 Kee KK KK KK KOR KK dul Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Hubert &. Olive, Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take! voluntary non suit against the defendant, and that the defendant desires to tal! voluntary non suit on his albged cause of action against the plaintiff: / It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the cause of act alleged by the plaintiff against the defendant be, and the same is herely # Suited and dismissed, and the alleged cause of action of the defendant rd plaintiff alleged in the answer be, and the same is hereby non suited and is Tt is further adjudged by the Court that plaintiff be taxed with the this action. This November lst., 1955. CONSENTED TO: RB. A Hedric —Ttornsy for Flaimerz7— Je G. i wis Ht orney for Defendant — eee eRe KK ke KK KK OK OF 146072 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY J. W. Seville, Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT vs. JUDGMENT Lester Huss, * CAROLINA Ba COUNTY 6053 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT of Mooresville v8. JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT rew Houston and wife, , Andrew Houston This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing that the parties defendant Defendant * e not the owners of the real estate affected by the suit; and it further appearing This cause coming on to be heard before t g he Honorable Carl G, Smith, Cer; at all the paving assessment levied against the real estate has been paid by the of Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the Plaintire for Judgnent "proper owners of the property. against the Defendant, Lester Huss, by default final: It is therefore, on motion of Z. V. Turlington, Attorney for the plaintiff, And it appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed and 19553 And if further appearing to the Court that said summons bes this action be and the same is herebynon-suited. Summons issued in this action on the 17th day of June, This the 23 day of November, 1955. together with a coy C. G. Smith of said Comphint was served on Defendant, Lester Huss, on the 25th day of June, Clerk Superior Court 19553 i VY. Turlington ep orney for Plaintiff. And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or other a kek E KR KK KOK KOR OR & pleadings have been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleating i350 PWORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY M. SHAVER, Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expirs; BEFORE THE CLERK And it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach -f an express contract to pay a sum of sm fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-ONE AND N0/100 JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT ($321.00) DOLLARS withinterest thereon at the rate of Six per cent (6% fra ( ANITE BOTTLING WORKS, INC., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) October 18, 1953, until paid; Defendant NOW, THEREFORE, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff and recover of the Defendant, Lester Huss, the sum of THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-ONE nd AND NO/100 ($321.00) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from October 16, 1953, # This cause comfg on to be heard before his Honor, C. G. Smith, Clerk of é erior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court me’ the defendant, since the institution of the action, ms settled in full, the the cost of this action. etln of the plaintire This the 23 day of November, 1955. IT Is, THEREFORE, upon motion of the plaintiff, ORDERED AND DECREED that the 2G ' , 5 ion be non suited Clerk of Superior and plaintiff be taxed with the cost. Thi Scott, Collier and Nash 8 25th day of November, 1955. Attorneys for Phaintiff Statesville North Carolina C. G. Smith erk Superior Court ee eK Ke ek ek ke Ke ke KK HK eee KKK KKK KK KK HK 1f6156 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY STATESVILLE FLOUR MILLS COMPANY, IN THE SUPERIOR coype BEFORE THE CLERK Plaintiff -VvVs- H. F. CROWSON AND MRS. W. B. CROWSON, JUDGMENT Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted on October 5th, 1955, by the filing of a Complaint and sung and that summons and complaint were served on the defendarss on October bth, 1966 that the action is founded on a note executed by the defendants to the Plaintitt upon which there is a balance due of FOUR THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SIXTEEN AND 58/100 ($4,316.58) DOLLARS as of February llth, 1955; have that more than thirty an elasped since the service upon the defendants and they have failed to answer or otherwise plead in this cause; it is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recom of the defendants in the sum of $4,316.58 with interest from February Lith, 1%, until paid; that defendants be taxed with the cost of this action. re en — erk ouperior eek eR Kee Ke Ke eR KKK KK This 25th day of November, 1955. $6167 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY R & J Discount Company, a corporation, Plaintiff vs. JUDGMENT James Hunter and Ethel Hunter, Defendants et et ee ee ee See This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North . and it appearig to the Court from the statement of the attorney for the pla | and from the defendants that the matters and things in controversy have bets Settled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected t0 in its actbn; se It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaint! | nonsuited and be taxed wth the costs ® be charged by the Clerks This 26 day of November, 1955. Consented to: Fred G. Chamble Attorney for the aintif Mrs, pphed Hunter efendant X____James Hunter ___— ~_* e& kk ee OF ¢. 0.9.6.6. 0.08 f ae take a some! ; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday November, 28 , 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OCTOBER TERM, 1955 ort CAROLINA PeDELL COUNTY : Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and a ey and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on che for the ph day of November, 1955, at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where His Honor, . pert E. Olive, Judge Presiding and holding Courts for this the Twenty-second cs dicial District of North Carolina, Winter Term, 1955, is present and presiding. . Rumple, High Sheriff, of Iredell County is present and opened Court by der of theCourts. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the ; mes of the following good and lawful men to serve as Jurors for this the 7 vender Term, 1955, Iredell County Superior Court, for the first week, to-wit: Deal W. D. Holland Clyde Caldwell P. F. Bowles Warry Hart G. L. 1 M. Freeman P, V. Breneman is Honeycutt J. C. Murdock, Jr. T, Mills C. T. L. Safriet D. W. Moore Claude H. Speece Hart R. A. Plott 1M, Johnston R. A. Stradley B. H. Mayberry rman E, Parlier B. S. Hollar J. A. Billings Holland Murdock Otha Smith | . F, Shoemaker Glenn Pter P, Holland C. W. Sherrill Keller E. O. | ther Thomasson a. Ti Aichara H. McDonald Hager R R Mayberry H. W. Parks Overcash J. L. Byers Mrs. Bessie Parker | » We. Murdock yp‘. Freeman, Hal M. Johnston, were excused by the Court. “fg T. Mills, B, s, Hollar & R. R. Mayberry were excused by Doctor's Certificates. on E. Parlier was excused until February Term, 1956. a F, Shoemaker is deceased. me following men:and women constitute what shall be hereafter termed ¢ Divorce Try Hart Jury #1 to-wit: Richerd H. McDonald P, V. Breneman J. C. Murdock, Jr. is Honeycutt Luther Thomasson L. W. Murdock c. T. G. L. Deal W. Hart ‘Ly Satriet Moore PP. Holiand IN THE SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER T Monday, November 28, 19550 1955 4$6138 North Carolina In the Superbr Court ’ Iredell County. November Term 1955, Sam Saunders Vs ISSUES Mary Saunders I Were the Plaintiff and the defendant married and are now husband an Wile, as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes. II Has the plaintiff and the defendant lived Separate and apart from each itp continuously fcr a period of two years prior to the commencement Of this actin! Answer Yes. III Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina for: period of six month immediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County November Term 1955, Sam . Saunders Vs JUDGMENT Mary Saunders ten This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this the Hovesber ia 1955, of the Iredell County Superior Court, before his honor Hubert &, Olive, it Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues presented t? in th the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set ot record, , of sat It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds a heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Sam Saunders and the defendant, dj Sam Sunt Saunders, be and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff, — se it eke kee KK He F ranted an absolute divorce from the defendant. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 Fe eee 0 Hiri CAROLINA ; REDELL COUNTY ; enneth Edgar Welborn, Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a Piclena Olive Byrd Welborn, b Defendant 3 l. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the ie ‘tonplaint? - ANSWER: Pe Be Yes. 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Marolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: Yes. 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived Separate and apart from each Mher for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: Yes. HORTH CAROLINA ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT REDELL COUNTY | enneth Edgar Welborn, j i Plaintiff } 4 j JUDGMENT Nolena Olive Byrd Welborn, } i Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Hubert E. eve, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November 1955 Term of the suger ier Court » Medel County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been "Perly served Personally with process, and the following issues having been Hinitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the Plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the mplaint? Answer: 2, "Yes", Nas the plaintitr been a bona fide resident of the State of North CArolina v si * months next Preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: 3, her @p t "Yes", Have the Plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each WO years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer; "Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------.- NOVEMBER TERM 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 ° NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Plaintity Kenneth Edgar Welborn, be and he is hereby granted anabsolute divore © from th defendant, Violena Olive Byrd Welborn, and that the bonds of matrimony } Cretorer, existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are dissolveq hereb re y And it is further ordered that the plaintiff Pay the costs of this act; Ctlon ty be taxed by the Clrk. This 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert EB. Olive Judge Presiding iia. eee ee KK RK eK Ke KK ee V#6157 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Ruth Owsley Greer, Plaintiff vs. ISSUES Paul Stanley Greer, Defendant 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Compitt! Answer Yes. 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fron eat 4 other continuously for two years next preceding the commencement of this actit! | Answer Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolin /« six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 x oui IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BuDELL COUNTY . Greer pth Owsley Oreriaintift 3 NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 JUDGMENT S. D. NO. 6157 iy) Stanley Greer, ce Defendant , This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the Bar term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the sues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as E ippears in the record; and the Court, after having inquired as to the fitness of the iy eplaintift to continue to have the custody and control of the child, finds it a fact haat it is for the best interest of the child that the sole custody and control of ithe infant child, George Gregory Greer, be awarded to the plaintiff. E IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of marriage Srp Pretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are { Pmreby dissolved and set aside, and the plaintiff is granted and absolute divorce if onthe defendant. $j ns bs 2 4 It is further ordered that the plaintiff be granted the sold custody, care and a f peintrol of the minor child, George Gregory Greer, and that the plaintiff pay the costs ‘ this action, Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding = eo be Mi Ke KK eK RK kk OK Ok Kk 17) erth Carolina, In the Superior Court, peedel) County, November Term, 1955. par) P, White, Plaintiff, Vs. DS S UES ge'don White, Defendant. \. Did the plaitiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband d wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, *. Did the Plaintiff and defendant seperate from each other, and have they “nuously lived Seperate and apart from each other for more than two years ‘diately Prior to the Answer ; 3. ? institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint Yes, lina Has the plaintirr been a bondifide resident of the State of North Caro n re than six months prior to the commencement of this action, as allged in the Plaing? IN THE SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, Monday, November 28, 1955 7 North Carolina, In the Superior Court ’ Iredell County. Pearl P. White, Plaintiff, November Term, 1955, Vs. J UDGMENT Gordon White, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Hubert ’ 4 E. Olive, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, at this Term of the Superior Court of jury having answered the issues subnity to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and Iredell County, North Carolina, and the against the defendant, as set out in the record; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the un are hereby disolved and set aside, and the plaintiff, Pearl P, White, is grants an absolute divorce from the defendant, Gordon White. This November 28th, 1955. Hubert E, Olive udge Presiding eee KR KK ek ee Ke eK Kk x J4$o172 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY | f IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1955 Virginia Hurley DeViney, Plaintiff j — 1 ISSUES James DeWitt Deviney j 1. Did the plaintiff and defendat intermarry and are they now husband wt as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and a from each other, and have they lived sqarate and apart from each other ge than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: 3. Has Yes. the plaintift been a bonatide resident of the ? for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action Answer: Yes, State of North on IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Dye CAROLINA =I . NOVEMBER TERM - 1955 4 IREDELL COUNTY | : virginia Hurley DeViney, Plaintiff cat JUDGMENT ; James DeWitt DeViney, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the F Superior Cout of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor Hubert E. ‘ Olive, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues E submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant E as set out in the records; It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of natrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Virginia Hurley DeViney, and the defendant, James DeWit DeViney, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Hubert E, Olive Judge Presiding Kw wR we Ke ee KK eK 6032 | NORTH CAROLINA | IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | Dallas A.Roberts, Plaintiff, VS. : Arthur E, Orbison, e Defendant. ? 1. In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? ANSWER: 500/00 Dollars. Pm ky NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY Dallas 4, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Roberts, Plaintiff, vs. irthur EB, Orbison, ) Defendant, ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Hubert " “live, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November (1955) Term of the Superior wat Ge Iredell County, and the jury having answered the isses submitted to them 8S follows: 1, plaintiff: In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the Answer: $500.00 Dollars IN THE SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK - N OVEMBER T Monday, November 28, 19550 1998 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED thet the pla tit? by and recover of the defendant the sum of Five Hundred & no/100 Dollars with inten thereon from the 28th day ofNovember, 1955, together with the Costs of th § action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 28th day of November, 1955. eee Ke ke Kk ke ee ke oe x “#6069 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY, Emory Logan Lowe, Administrator of William Charles Lowe, Plaintiff Vs. F, S. Bumgardner ,Johnie R. Bumgardner, Minor, James R. Lazenby and Motor Mart, Inc., Se ee ee ee nce ee et ee el Stl tl eee Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, Hur E. Olive, Judge presiding, of the Superior Court of Iredell County at the November 1955 Civil Term, upon the demurrers of the defendants; and the Court having fully heard the matter and the argument of counsel for the plaintiff and the defendants, and being of the opinion that the demurrers should be dale and overruled. IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that te demurrers of th defendants be, and they are in all respects, denied and overruled; the defendants will have thirty days from this date to file answer or otherwise 1 as they may be advised. Novesber 4 Signed and entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County om 1955. H tT ubert ve, ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---------- NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 ye f 0 Meth CAROLINA, PEDELL COUNTY. . Roscoe Lawter, Guardian of a Me ctseine Lawter, Minor, Plaintiff, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. Vs. , Bumgardner, Johnie R. Bumgardner, at janes R. Lazenby and Motor Mart, i ee ee Ce Ce i Me” ee nee” Sel Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, Hubert Plive, Judge presiding, of the Superior Court of Iredell County at the November a Civil Term, upon the demurrers of the defendants; and the Court having fully Board the matter and the argument of counsel for the plaintiff and the defendants, od being of the opinion that the demurrers should be denied and overruled. ; IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the demurrers of the ‘ efendants be, and they are in all respects, denied and overruled; the defendants will ‘hare thirty days from this date to file answer or otherwise plea as they may be Mivised, : Signed and entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County on November 2s, 1955, . Hubert E. Olive if Hubert Olive, Judge Presiding : eke Ke KR eK 79) PORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT REDELL COUNTY, NOVEMBER TERM 1955 NNIE Bailey Hud DT Alonza — Administratrix Plaintiff, Vs, JUDGMENT "eral Accident, Fire and Life surance Corpo 80 Bailey, poration, LTD., and Defendants. THIS CAUSE, einins on for trial at the November 1955 Term of Iredell County i prior Court, before s Honor Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding, and it appearing ® the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff of Iredell County to come nd Prosecute this action, or she would be non-suited, and it appearing to the “at the Plaintir failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action; rmst wait SUPERIOR come 28 Mw sormzee comer » 1955 WEEK » 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 #3791 -- Cont. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THar this action art CAROLINA, er eee noe &, ani | the same is hereby dismissed, and the Plaintiff non~-suited and taxed with PeDELL COUNTY. NOVEMBER, 1955 CIVIL TERM th the Cort in this acton. Donnie Campbell, by his next fiend, 1. Paul Swa im, Defendant, é Plaintiff, It appears to the court from Statement of counsel that the Insurance Company, filed an answer in this cause, but the Defendant, Cleo Batley . Vs. JUDGMENT ' did not file an answer, and that the Defendant, Cleo Bailey, was the Benefician Phichard S. Feimster and wife, Mrs. named in the policy referred to in the pleadings. getty Duke Pens Defendants. And it further appears to the Court from the statement of Counsel and tiy Clerk of the Superior Court that at the time the Defendant, Insurance This cause coming on to be heard at the November, 1955 Civil Term of the Compan filed its answer in this cause it deposited with the Clerk of the — ( edell County Superior Court before his Honor, Hubert Olive, Judge presiding, and of Iredell County its draft No. A-U 12232, dated July 13, 1943, in the gun of ty being heard by consent of the parties without a Jury; that the cause was heard upon Hundred Dollars ($500.00), payable to the order of Cc. G, Smith, Clerk of tie tatements of cansel for both parties and evidence submitted to the Court by a duly Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, for Cleo Bailey; and it furie MMpicensed physician from which it appears to the Court that the minor, Ronnie Campbell appearing to the Court that the aforesaid draft was to be disbursed under tlie pvelve years of age, by his next friend, L. Paul Swaim, institutednthis action to orders of the Court; and the Court finds as a fact that the aforesaid draft has i ecover damages which he sustained because of injuries received by him resulting not been cashed by the Clerk of the Superior Court and is now in his hands, ani . rom an automobile accident involving an automobile belonging to the defendants and that there has been no orders entered in this cause for the disbursement of th Porother one bdonging to L. Paul Swaim, at the intersection of Winston Avenue and proceeds of the aforesaid draft, and that the Plaintiff ims ben called at this pourth Street, in the City of Statesville, North Carolina, on November 28, 1954; term of Court and non-suited, as appears above; and the Court further finds tt Mand it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendants have agreedupon a the Defendant, General Ageident, Fire and Lite Assurance Corporation, 11., i : ettlement of all matters and things growing out of the alleged injuries set forth i d to now entitled to have the aforesaii draft returned to it: pr the plaintiff's rt We ee Mee OF Wick the defendante have agres tT 13, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED That C. G. Smith, (let gig! the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) in full and complete settlement of the ” , — Binor' of Superior Court of Iredell County, make a notation on the back of the aforwi : or's alleged injuries. And the C he evilence in the case, particularly draft that by order of this Court the draft is returned to the Defendant, curt having carefully examined the e General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, LTD., and upon the afer pthe evidence. of the physician under whose care the minor was treated, and it was made ¥ ’ +9 entry being made on the aforementioned draft. C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superi@ ©° appear to the Court that the parents of the child are entirely satisfied with the 6 e ’ jens at tnd County Sc: AMIE! Tidemes ous éteuinnad in Ee aforenentiie tttlement, and that Dr. W. A. Warner, a duly licensed physician of the Davis oat, Posptal at Statesville, North Carolina, who treated him, is of the opinion that the General ic draft to Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the Defendant, J inor' Fire and Life Assura Cc ti LTD., for delivery to said Defendant, § injuries were very slight, and he has made a complete recovery; that after urance Corporation, -, for de vies : Wl inquiry into the matter, the Court enters the following decree: eirexecutin po Pneenee Seeeee 1. That the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of One Hundred Dollars This the 28th day of November, 1955. ; $100.00) , to be paid by the defendants into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Curt of Tredel) County, @ Statesville, North Carolina. | , her and RECEIPT | *+ That out of the funds paid to him, the Clerk shall pay to the mothe Iredell Cou! tepf, lars Received of C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of % a Ait minor, Mr. and Mrs. L. Paul Swaim, the sum of One Hundred Dol the 100, ™ Dollars North Carolina, the Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) draft referred t0 a | 00) to reimburse them for the hospital bill in the amount of Forty-Two ¢ ght th the foregoing judgment, with an entry having been made on the back oa uf ‘Sete (842.80), and for other expenses incurrad by them in connection wi Ccid that it was delivered © us for the Defendant, General Accident, Ear , "S* in which. the minor was injured. Assurance Corporation, LTD., by virtue of the above order. This the 28th day of November, 1955. ADAMS, DEARMAN & Bolt for General Acc ‘ Life Assurance By: *eekeneR KK eH KE IN THE SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER T Monday, November 28, 19558 1995 3. That the settlement between the parties, entered by consent » Gnd a by the Court, is not unreasonable or unjust to the minor Plaintire but 4 8 to hi, best interest. Signed and entered in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of 1 Tede)} County, at Statesville, North Carolina, on November 28, 1955, Hubert E, 0 ubert ve, x ity BY CONSENT: L. Paul Swaim aul Swaim, next friend and step- father of Ronnie Campbell, minor, Mrs. L. Paul Swaim Mrs. L. Paul Swaim, mother of Ronnie Campbell, minor, C. H. Dearmon C.-H. Dearman of the firm, Adams, ioareae & Whberry, Attorneys for. plaintiff, Boyce G. Gibson, Jr. ae oyce ibson, Jr., Attorney for defendants. eee RHE KR KR KR eK KR ee kK RE 16201 NORTH CAROLINA® IREDELL COUNTY. IN TRE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER, 1955 CIVIL TERM Brenda me by her next friend, L.Paul Swaim Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT Richard S. Feimster and wife, Betty Duke Feimster Mrs. Se ene ee Se ee Sie et ee Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard at the November, 1955 Civil Tern of th Iredell County Superior Court before his Honor, Hubert Olive, Judge presidis and being heard by consent of the parties without a Jury; that the cause wt I upon statements of counsel for both parties and evidence submitted to theCour by a duly licensed physician from which it appears to the Court that the) Brenda Campbell, thirteen years of age, by her next friend, L. Paul oa, instituted this action to recoer damages which she sustained because of o* received by her resulting from an automobile accident involving 4” a belonging to the defendants and another one belonging to lL. Paul Swain, i intersection of Winston Avenue and Fourth Street, in the City “ ., North Carolina, on November 28, 1954; and it appearing to the Cour a Plaintiff and defendants have agreed upon a settlement of all matter growing out of the alleged injuries set forth in the plaintiff's ' cnet terms of which the defendants have agreed to pay the sum of one ret ($100.00) in full and complete settlement of the minor's alleged IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------- NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 And the Court having carefully examined the evidence in the case, particularly i evidence of the physician under whose care the minor was treated, and it was BS ade to appear to the Court that the parents of the child are entirely satisfied ; awith the settlement, and that Dr. W. A. Warner, a duly licensed Physician of the avis Hospital at Statesville, North Carolina, who treated her, is of the opinion Banat the minor's injuries were very slight, and she has made a complete recovery; “that after full inquiry into the matter, the Court enters the following decree: : 1. That the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of One Hundred llars ($100.00), to be paid by the defendants into the office of the Clerk of Bthe Superior Court of Iredell County, at Staesville, North Carolina. 2. That out of the funds paid to him, the Clerk shall pay to the mother and : & of the minor, Mr. and Mrs. L. Paul Swaim, the sum of One Hundred Soller ($100.00) to reimburse them for the hospital bill in the amount of p sixteen Dollars ($16.00), and for other expenses incurred by them in connection mith the accident in which the minor was injured. : 3. That the settlement bet. 2en the parties, entered by consent, and approved q the Court, is not unreasonable or unjust to the minor plairiff but is to her best interest. Signed and entered in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell on November 28, 1955. peouty, at Statesville, North Carolina, Hubert E. Olive Hubert Olive, Judee presiding PSY CONSENT: L. Paul Swaim py: Faul Swaim, next friend and step- Mather of Brenda Campbell, minor, Mrs. L. Payl Swaim 8. L. Pau waim, mother o arpbeil, minge Brenda oo C,H, iia: move fe Vearman # Dearnan & Wi of the firm, Plaintire, Adams, nberry, Attorneys for Boyce G, Gibson.Jr. boyce G, Befendants oo" Jr., Attorney for kek KK Re KK KK KK SR ee IN THE: SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------~- NOVEMBER T Monday, ERM, 1955 November 28, 1955 North Carolina, Iredell County. 7a the Supersde a" Arlie Johnson vs Myrtle Conner Benfield & husband, Fred Benfield This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredel) Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Pldntiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected t) appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and tiy Same is hereby dismissed, and the Plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28 day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive sODGE risa wee ek Ok eo etek “ESp 3667 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Annie Littlejohn, et al vs. Mary Connor, et al This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superi« Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiffs were called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action * they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: nd It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be,! $. the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiffs are taxed with the cost Hubert E. 0 kkk kK ee ee ke eK ROKK This the 28th day of November, 1955. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 ” Monday, November 28, 1955. : © 45320 ' Vorth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. E John Henry Jones VSe FE Mabel Jones 52 BM ue ee 7: ee eae ee Vi eta baeeoe ¢ This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before te undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the | same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. FE This the 28th day of Ngvember, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PR DING KKK KKK KK KK Kk OK OK D A5uu6 F North Carolina, Fife: In the Supe@ior Court, 2 Iredell County. F Montest R. Cline Pe ta v8. JUDGMENT y as © Russell S. Cline fe a 4 This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior f Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she é would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to p 4PPear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. IN THE SUPERIOR courT FIRST WEEK -------- NOVEMBER TERM Monday, November 28, 1955 ” 1955 445290 North Carolina, In the Superio Ifedell County. P r court, Arlie Johnson vs Myrtle Conner Benfield & husband, Fred Benfield This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Tredel] Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that. the Pldntiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and Prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected +) appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and th same is hereby dismissed, and the Plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28 day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive sODGE rare a i se “#Sp 3667 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Annie Littlejohn, et al vs. Mary Connor, et al This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superit Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court oe ? Plaintiffs were called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this ac they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: and It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, $. the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiffs are taxed with the cost ek ke kK ke ke ek we Ke we Ke KKK This the 28th day of November, 1955. = 45320 : 1 Carolina, | Iredell County. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 - Monday, November 28, 1955. : In the Superior Court, , Iredell County. q John Henry Jones V8. E Mabel Jones This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior ‘ Court before te undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the 4 Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he : would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected Eto appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the “ same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is t.xed with the costs. This the 2&th day of Ngvember, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING wwe eK KKK Kk KK OK & In the Supa@ior Court, ) Montest R. Cline V8. JUDGMENT E Russell S, Cline This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior | Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she | Would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert _E. Olive IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER T Monday, November 28, 1955.” 1955 A5L55 North Carolina, In the Superior ¢ Iredell County. . . Betty Jean Houston BNF Macon M Simons vs JUD Coyte Eugene Houston This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Tern of Iredell Superior tng before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintits, were called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiffs failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiffs are taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING ee wR eK ke ke kk kK Kk eK #5517 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. L. B. Spillman VS- J U_D G MENT Treava Spillman This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superia Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that te Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action *™ would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is Therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, an Same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the cost® J xekKe KK eK KK KK KK This the 28 day of November, 1955. oe * he “4 E Iredell Qounty. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 - Monday, November 28, 1955” 45591 jorth Carolina, In the Superior Court, » Iredell County. a ee | uenry Carson vs i vary Dalton Carson This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior ' court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the 7 Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he - would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected P to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the S sane is hereby dismissed, andthe plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28 day of November, 1955, Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING ww we Re eK KK KK Kk KK OK E 45593 | North Carolina, In the Superior Court, F bron E, Lackey, Jr V8. JUDGMENT z Jean Harlow Lackey This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior ’ Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the ) flaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he p Would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected 3 ‘0 appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the g “ime is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert ©. Olive D ee KK KK Ke KK KK K IN THE SUPER TOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, Monday, November 28, 1955" Om TP C li orth Carolina, In the S$ Iredell County. uperior Court, Auto Finance Co of Statesville, INC. vs. JU John W. Baird & wife Naomi C. Baird This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Super Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this Gction or thy would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected +) appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, This the 28th day of NQvember, 1955. E, live NG wm wm ee ke oe ke oe ke ke ok ok oe J#5797 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Auto Finance Corp, Inc of Statesville N. Cc. JUDGMENT vs. James L, Lambert This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Tern of Iredell Super! Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed amd neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs: This the 28 day of November, 1955. keke KK eK Ke ee ke Ke KK KH E Iredell County. a; <a b Thomas Brown Little IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM,1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 #581) olina © orth Car ’ In the Superior Court, F iredell County. 4 J, R» Morrison VS« y. W. Thompson This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior - Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the a Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he 4 would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to ppear and prosecute this actin: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the , same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING eR ew ee ke kK ke kk ke kk Kk Ke Kk #5830 | North Carolina, In the Superior Court, | Wvis Brown Little vs This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior > out before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff Bs called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be B r-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear 4 and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the “ine is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. Hubert E. Olive U eek eR Kk Ke eK kK OK OK This the 28th day of November, 1955. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM? 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 ° 45943 North Carolina, In the Superi Iredell County. Perior Court, James Paul Brewer V8. JUD Mary Catherine Brewer This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredel} Super} or Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglects to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and th same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive kK KK KR RK Ke we kk Kk & #5963 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Gertrude G. White vs. JUDGMENT Trois W. White This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Supt Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that th she Plaintiff was calledby the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action * Lect would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neg to appear and prosecute this action: action be, «™ It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this Same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs: This the 28 day of November, 1955. Hub Keke KK ek eK Ke KOK OK KH | ‘North Carolina, IN THE SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 it In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ; Statesville Used Auto ' Parts, Inc. V8. : Clyde Robert Moore 4 Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court that the j Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or 7 they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and q neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and . the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. A b ; Ceneral Motors Acceptance . Bi. % ct a This the 28th day of Noember, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING eowK OK Ke ee ek OK KK ok Ok A601,9 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. . : Corp V8. JUDGMENT . Card D, Hodgson This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior ; Court Before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the » Plaintire was called by the Sheriff tocome in and prosecute this action or they p Would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected t ° appear ang prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the m 8a ne 18 hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive wT << eek RK KR Kk KK ke eK State of North Carolina Department of Archives and History Raleigh SPLICING AUTHENTICITY CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the following records of me Dei Country consisting of My p/7E DOck ET SU PE R10 R Coun) i beginning with (77 @ EF 4AG2 and ending with (77 @ & 46 3 have been microfilmed to correct an error in, or to improve the quality of, the original film, The error or the unsatisfactory image or images will be cut o* of the original film and the retake beginning and ending as indicated above will be spliced in as a replacement. This is further to certify that the microphotographic processes were accomplished in accordance with Chapters 8-45.1--8-45.4, inclusive » General Statutes of North Carolina, by the undersigned on the date and at the reduc- tion ratio indicated below. Date Reduction Ratio Microfilm Camera Operator IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM® Monday, November 28, 1955 ° — A5943 North Carolina, In the Superior ¢ Iredell County. ourt, James Paul Brewer VS. fary Catherine Brewer This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredel) Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE S KKK KK RK KK wR Ke Ke #5963 North Carolina, In the Superior Iredell County. Gertrude G. White VS. Trois W. White This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to she Court that the Plaintiff was calledby the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or s and neglected would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed to appear and prosecute this action: ‘ nd the It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, 4 same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. Hubert_& Olive JUDGE N eeheeknuekeRn eR KEK KEK HE This the 28 day of November, 1955. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 6023 — Carolina, a In the Superior Court, Iredell ountye statesville Used Auto Parts, Ince VS. JUDGMENT Clyde Robert Moore This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of Noember, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING (#6049 North Carolina, Iredell County. Ceneral Motors Acceptance Corp VS. Card D. Hodgson This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Tern of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff tocome in and prosecute this action or they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same ig hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive — eon PRESIDING kekRK KKK RK KOK KH * nrg atoms iaaron ieee en Ae Sn cE OS = ss oe a ste IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM? 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 ° 45943 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. James Paul Brewer vs. ee aq, eS co QQ = e3] =a fe Mary Catherine Brewer This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredel) Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE S ke Kk we we RK KK wR KK KK #5963 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Gertrude G. White vs. : JUDGMENT t Trois W. White 4 This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Supericr Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to che Court that the Plaintiff was calledby the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or &% ; : would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglecte to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action game is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. Hubert_E. Olive JUDGE TDIN kkhekh kk eR RE K KE EK HEF This the 28 day of November, 1955. be, and the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 id vorth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. statesville Used Auto Parts, Ince JUDGMENT VS Clyde Robert Moore This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of Noember, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING kok Ok Kk OK OK kok oe x ee #6049 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. General Motors Acceptance Corp VS. ee cq, Card D. Hodgson This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Tern of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff tocome in and prosecute this action or they Would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected ‘0 appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the sane ig hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 28th day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive ————— JUDGE PRESIDING ceheeeneeeane eee * * Sa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- NOVEMBER TERM 1955 Monday, November 28, 1955 ” 446057 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. R & J Discount Co VS. _—_—— — — — —_—— oe ee ce Cc, os o q = we a Bill C James This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Irede)} Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute thisvaction or they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, This the 28 day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive ~ JUDG — ok ok ok KK Oe wk eK RK KK #5269 NORTH CAROLINA 4 In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY | November Term, 1955. Ivey Daniel Sherrill vs JUDGMENT See ee Clara Bell Sherrill This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at this term of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Hubert 5. Olive, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that this action was efendant, and that 8 tried, brought by the plaintiff for a divorce absolute from the d the plaintiff died during the pendency of the action and before it wa said action thereby abating: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that this action be, and the sane is hereby non-suited and dismissed, the plaintiff beinz taxed with the costs Hubert E. Olive ——~judge Presiding “ of the action. eokk kok K KO KR RK KF mber 29, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday, Morning, Nove 1955, at 9:30 otclock A. M. ig La Leone JU 89 eh carolina, iredell County + j, Ne Cleary j E. ‘ vjand, Je M Poteet IN THE SUPERIOR COURT RST WEEK --------- NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 FIRS’ uesday, November 29, 1955 In the Superior Court, JUDGMENT vs cleary Poteet & al C4 CS o This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court wtore the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was ralled by the Sheriff to com and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the sane ig hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 29th day of November, 1955. Kubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING keKK KE KK KOK OK RK RK KK Ke AND NORTH CAROLINA TKEDELL COUNTY IN THE Si}PERIOR COURT i. i, Davis, Jr., Plaintiff ORDER OF REFERENCE iW. Davis, Jr., Defendant ) ) ) ~v8- ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard, before lis Honor Hubert Olive, Judge residing, at the November Term, 1955, Iredell Superior Court. The Court after a tiscussion with Counsel and after inspecting the pleadines nas determined to his ™ satistaction that the issues of law and fact involved in this matter will "quire the taking of a long and tedious account of transactions of an operating lrtnership and that such a trial would be difficult for a Jury to understand and “llow and that the ends of justice would be better served for the entire matter to “referred to the end that a proper accounting may be had and that all matters i te 2 . Presented to the court by a Referee as provided in Oy Sa: S009 REED that this cause to hear all j be h It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DEC be and the Same 1s hereby referred to Honorable Fred G. Chamblee, as Referee, e referee is directed to tatters . of law and fact, at issue, in this cause. 1 nd as soon there- Proce ' dat his convenience to hear the evidence of the parties @ after a court 8 he has heard all matters at issue in law and fact, to render to this his fs ‘ndings and conclusions. ded. T ; i his cause 48 retained for further orders except 49 herein prov’ Clive ——_—— Hubert E. —Presiding Judge T laintiff © the Signing of the foregoing order of compulsory reference, the P nd def endant in y Jury demanded. Hubert_E- apt time except, & trial b Olive gkhekk ke ke ee HF e in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, sii aie THE SUPERIOR COURT F ------- NOVEMBER TER Monday, November 28, 1955" Sa 46057 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. R & J Discount Co VS. c, cS o © = <3) ar Bill C James This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Irede)) Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, This the 28 day of November, 1955. Hubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING mek we ke we Ke Ke eK HK OK OK #5869 NORTH CAROLINA 4 In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY | November Term, 1955. Ivey Daniel Sherrill vs ti etl CC oS o QQ es 3 Clara Belli Sherrill This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at this term of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Hubert 4. Clive, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that this action was orought by the plaintiff for a divorce absolute from the defendant, and that and before it was tried, the plaintiff died during the pendency of the action said action thereby abating: It is therefore ordered and adjudced that this action be, and the sane is hereby non-suited and dismissed, the plaintiff being taxed with the costs Hubert E. Olive ———Judge Presiding * of the action. moe kK RK Ke OK KK KK mber 29, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday, Morning, Nove 1955, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. ¢ ; JU R : 45589 carolina , IN THE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK ------ --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 ST FIR Tuesday, November 29, 1955 ort In the Superior Court, sede County- , Ne Cleary JUDGMENT vs & ney Be Cleary Poteet seed, J, M Poteet This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court wfore the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was railed by the Sheriff to com and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the ane ig hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 29th day of November, 1955. Kubert E. Olive JUDGE PRESIDING keekweKR He KK KKK KK OK F ANAL \0RTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i, H. Davis, Jr., Plaintiff ORDER OF REFERENCE iW, Davis, Jr., Defendant ) ) ) -vS- ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard, before iis Honor Hubert Olive, Judge residing, at the November Term, 1955, Iredell Superior Court. The Court after a tiscussion with Counsel and after inspecting the pleadinss has determined to his ™ Satisfaction that the issues of law and fact involved in this matter will "quire the taking of a long and tedious account of transactions of an operating Mrtnership and that such a trial would be difficult for a jury 0 understand and *llow and that the ends of justice would be better served for the entire matter to ‘referred to the end that a proper accounting may be had and that all matters can he S ; Presented to the court by a Referee as provided in % »- a It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this cause be and the as Referee, to hear all Same is hereby referred to Honorable Fred G. Chamblee, nat ; ers of law and fact, at issue, in this cause. The referee iS directed to Proceed d as soon there- at his convenience to hear the evidence of the parties an to render to this court after *s he has heard all matters at issue in law and fact, Nis fy indings and conclusions. ed. , . his cause ig retained for further orders except as herein provid laintiff eae Signing of the foregoing order of compulsory references the P and def *ndant in apt time except, & trial by Jury demanded. Hubert_B. Ol ) iy Ta J ive kkk kK OK RK RR KH KF e in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, Hubert _E. Olive residing Judge IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMBER TERM 1955 Tuesday, November 29, 1955 : #5829 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIO IREDELL COUNTY. OR COURT W. B. Waugh, Plaintiff Vs. ORDER Flake Bhyne Stout and Oren T. Stout, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor Hub . ert Olive, Judge presiding, of the Superior Court of Iredell County at the Novent , er 1955 Civil Term upon the demurrer of Oren T. Stout, one of the defendants: ang tl ’ he | Court having fully heard the matter and the argument of counsel for the plaintiss and the defendants, and being of the opinion that the demurrer should be sustaine and the plaintiff be permitted to ammend his complaint, if he so desires, IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the demurrer of Oren 1, | Sout be sustained and the cause of action against him be dismissed; that the plaintiff shall have thirty days in which to file an ammended complaint, if he so desires, and the defendants shall have thirty days thereafter in which to file an answer or otherwise plead as they may be advised. Signed and entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County at Statesville, North Carolina, on November 29, 1955. Hubert E. Olive Hubert Olive, Judge presiding wok kok ke RK KK we Ke KK OK #6012 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Lester Lee Sloan, Plaimiff vs. Lee Graham Caudell we te eee eH wm wo GS 1c} Ww Defendant : fendatt, 1. Was te plaintiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of the de as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: Yes. 2. What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recy! of the defendant? ANSWER: $711.00. nce of the e 3. Was the automobile of the defendant damaged by the negli£ plaintiff, as alleged in the Answer and Counterclaim? ANSWER: I " ant entitled to rece 4. What amount of damages, if any, is the defend of the plaintiff? ANSWER: _ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT T WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 _ Tuesday, November 29, 1955 012 Ml 2 sepowing jury was sworn and impanelled: P. V. Breneman Hart Hate Honeycutt ze _ oo He oA Safriet > e art richard H. McDonald R. A. Stradley Luther Thomasson Glenn Holland C. W. Murdock Fe, Murdock «ggg CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT gps COUNTY lester Lee Sloan, Plaintiff JUDGMENT V8« we Graham Caudell Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Hudert E. live, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November-December Term of the Superior ‘ort of Iredell County, and the jury having answered the Issues submitted to them, as follows: "1, Was the plaintiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of the iefendant, as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: Yes. 2. What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover ofthe defendant? ANSWER: $711.00. 3. Was the automobile of the defendant damaged by the negligence of the jlaintiff, as alleged in the Answer and Counterclaim? ANSWER : ° 4. What amount of damages, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover of the plaintiff? the plaintiff have NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that 00 ($711.00) ind recover of the defadant the sum of Seven Hundred Eleven and no/1l ent until paid, together ) llars with interest thereon from the date of this Judgm With the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. Hubert_E. Olive Judge residing T a ae a es Ne Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday This lst day of December, 1955. Morning, November 30, 1955 a 9336 o'clock ag. i . if Ad IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---.-... NOVEMBER TERM 1955 Wednesday, November “ae #5879 The following was sworn and impanelled: Harry Hart Breneman Otis Honeycutt Moore H. L. Safriet Hart Richard H. McDonald Stradley Luther Thomasson Holland L. W. Murdock Murdock NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY RY E. J. Smith & Sons Co, vs Edward M, CLoanhgcer & J Roy Hoover, T/A C & H Implement Co In what amount, if any, are the defendants indebted to the plaintire? ANSWER: None Return all merchandise to &, J. Smith & Sons, NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY COURT &. J. Smith & Sons Co, Plaintiff, vs JUDGMENT Edward M, Cloaninger and J. Roy Hoover, T/AC&KH Implement Company, Defendants, ) ) ) ) } } ) Ind This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor Hubert B. Olive, Judge Presiding and a jury, at the November 22, 1955, Term of Iredell County Superior Court, and the jury having answered the Issue submitted to it as follows: "In what amount if any, are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff: Answer: None. Return all merchandise to E. J. Smith & Son." It jis, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recovel nothing of the defendants and that the plaintirr pay the costs as taxed by the Clerk. i It is further ordered that the defendants return all merchandise now on hé So the plaintiff, B. J. Smith & Sons. This 30th day of November, 1955, Hubert EB. Olive Judge Presiding ; mber 1, 197 This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morining, Dece 9330 otclock A. M, IN THE SUFERIOR cCouRT T WEEK NOVEMTER TERM, 1055 we Thursday, December 1, 1956 1 1 CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Powers illian Howard Plaintiff vs. : y, Willis and Walter H. Willis, 1, Defendants eeeeeetee ee |, Was the Plaintiff's automobile damaged by the nezligence of the defendants, as jlleged in the Complaint? Answer: No, 2, What amount of damares, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the iefendants? Answer: $ j, Was the defendants automobile damaged by the neclivence of the plaintiff, as illeged in the defendants Answer? Answer: No. that amount, if any, are the defendants entitled to recover of the plaintiff? Answer: $ ea reentrant HATH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TEDELL COUNTY Kiliam Howard Powers, Plaintiff vs. ‘WW. Willig and Walter H, Willis, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor, Hubert E. ‘ive, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November, 1955 term of Superior Court of "dell County and a jury having answered the Issues submitted to them as follows: 1, Was the Plaintiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of the defendants, “alleced in the Complaint? Answer: No, : oe , er of ¢. What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recove Mt defendants: Answer: $ - nn eastetmees 3s Was a intiff the defendants automobile damaged by the negligence of te pla ; * alleged in the defendants Answer? Answer: No, he plaintiff? 4. What amount, if any, are the defendants entitled to recover of the Pp Answer; $ teet a N . "', THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed; 466 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----~---- NOVEMBER TERM 1955 Wednesday, November 30, 1955 mare #5879 The following was sworn and impanelled: re Ve Cs Ts D. W. R« As Glenn Ce. Us Harry Hart Otis Honeycutt H. Le. Safriet Richard H. McDonald Luther Thomasson L. W. Murdock Breneman Moore Hart Stradley Holland Murdock NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR IREDELL COUNTY E. J. Smith & Sons Co. vs Edward M. CLoanhger & J Roy Hoover, T/A C & H Implement Co In what amount, if any, are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff? ANSWER: None Return all merchandise to E. J. Smith & Sons. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT E. J. Smith & Sons Co, Plaintiff, vs Edward M. Cloaninger and J. Roy Hoover, T/A C & H Implement Company, Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding and a jury, at the November 2%, 1955, Term of Iredell County Superior Court, and the jury having answered the Issue submitted to it as follows: s ffs "In what amount if any, are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: None. Return all merchandise to E. J. Smith & Son." he plaintiff recover axed by the It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that t nothing of the defendants and that the plaintiff pay the costs as t Clerk. n hand sge now ° It is further ordered that the defendants return all merchandise to the plaintiff, E. J. Smith & Sons. This 30th day of November, 1955. Hubert _E. Olive Judge Presiding ber } 195) y im ’ This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morining, Dece at 9:30 o'clock A. M, — Michie fe IN THE avrent COURT T WEEK NOVEMTER TERM, 1955 _ Thursday, December 1, 1955 ‘$7 CAROLINA sail COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Powers jiiian Howard Owe) aintiff v8. ees Walter fH. Willis, 1, Ss Defendants }, Was the Plaintiff's automobile damaged by the nezligence of the defendants, as Answer: No. alleged in the Complaint? 2, What anount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the iefendants ? Answer: $ : Was the defendants automobile damaged by the negligence of the plaintiff, as iliezed in the defendants Answer? Answer: No. |, What amount, if any, are the defendants entitled to recover of the plaintiff? Answer: $ MATH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TEDELL COUNTY iilliam Howard Powers, Plaintiff vs. \W. Willis and Walter H. Willis, Defendants, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor, Hubert E. ‘live, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November, 1955 term of Superior Court of Iredell County and a jury having answered the Issues submitted to them as follows: l, Was the plaintiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of the defendants, ‘Salleged in the Complaint? Answer: No, ‘ + of @. What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover ‘he defendants: Answer: ¢ <_ eee 3. Was plaintiff, alleged in the defendants automobile damaged by the negligence of te the defendants Answer? Answer: No. er of the plaintiff? What amount, if any, are the defendants entitled to recov Answer : $ Lite N . OW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------.. NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, November 30, 1955 #5879 The following was sworn and impanelled: Harry Hart P. V. Breneman Otis Honeycutt C. T. Moore H. L. Safriet D. W. Hart Richard H. McDonald R. A. Stradley Luther Thomasson Glenn Holland L. W. Murdock C. W. Murdock NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR IREDELL COUNTY E. J. Smith & Sons Co. vs Edward M. CLoanhger & J Roy Hoover, T/A C& H Implement Co In what amount, if any, are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff? ANSWER: None Return all merchandise to E. J. Smith & Sons. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT E. J. Smith & Sons Co, Plaintiff, vs JUDGMENT Edward M, Cloaninger and J. Roy Hoover, T/A C & H Implement Company, Defendants, Se ee et ee ee ee This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding and a jury, at the November 28, 1955, Term of Iredell County Superit Court, and the jury having answered the Issue submitted to it as follows: "In what amount if any, are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff: Answer: None. Return all merchandise to E. J. Smith & Son." recove! It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff by the nothing of the defendants and that the plaintiff pay the costs 4s taxed DY Clerk. hand now on It is further ordered that the defendants return all merchandise to the plaintiff, E. J. Smith & Sons. This 30th day of November, 1955. H E ¥ This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morining, Decem at 9:30 o'clock A. M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK NOVEMTER TERM, 1955 Thursday, December 1, 1955 4915 irk CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT g0BLL COUNTY ¢ d Powers jillian Howar Plaintiff v8. . y, Willis and Walter H. Willis, Defendants |, Was the Plaintiff's automobile damaged by the nezligence of the defendants, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: No. | 2, What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants? Answer: $ }, Was the defendants automobile damaged by the negligence of the plaintiff, as alleged in the defendants Answer? Answer: No. What amount, if any, are the defendants entitled to recover of the plaintiff? Answer: $ WRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT EDEL COUNTY ‘illiam Howard Powers : Plaintiff vs. JUDGMENT '\W. Willis and Walter H. Willis, Defendants, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor, Hubert E. live, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November, 1955 term of Superior Court of ‘dell County and a jury having answered the Issues submitted to them as follows: 1, Was the plaintiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of the defendants, S alleved in the Complaint? Answer: No. of ¢. What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover the defendants: Answer; - ee 3. Was "alleged in intiff the defendants automobile damaged by the negligence of he pla : the defendants Answer? Answer; No, l plaintiff? f the “hat amount, if any, are the defendants entitled to recover © Answer; $ N Ow, THEREFORE , it is ordered, adjudged and decreed; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------~ NOVEMBER TERM Thursday, December 1, 1955 ” 1955. I ‘ That the plaintiff recover nothing by this action, II That the defendants recover nothing by their counter claim, IfI That the costs of this action be taxed against the Plaintiff, This the lst day of December, 1955. Hubert E.Olive Judge Presiding OK OK ek ke ok ok detoiiok ak ok dak #4312 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Harold B. Stewart, Henry J Stewart & WM Wauch The Board of Education of Iredell County, N. C. ) ) ) vs ) ) ) ) This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiffs were called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or they would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plantiffs failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudeed and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff were taxed with the costs. This the lst day of December, 1955. Hubert E. Olive HK wk we kk ek Kk kK He we Ke Ke 1955 This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, December >, at 10:00 o'clock A, M. No. 6167 R& J Discount Co, A Cor * “No. 5923 Rhoyd Scott VS Lorraine Scott wre = Continue “No. 6082 Betty W Cline VS Thomas W Cline -------------------""" ====Cont sn “No. 6113 Beatrice Poole Mayes VS Shuford Mayes a----=-Contime “No. 5391 Marie O Cook VS James L Miller; Howard Miller esha --Cont inue” “No. 5392 Clifford Woodrow Bea VS James L Miller, Howard Myller, “No. 6122 International Shoe Co VS Authur Keith Shealy, etal No.5823 Sample-Winters Implement Co VS Edward M Cloaninger,, No. 5848 Southland Petroleum Co, Inc VS John R Murdock, et 4 wo: 038 Virginia H DeViney VS Bobby William Edwards ----- “ai nnotuone No. 6087 R& J Discount Co, A Corp vs Floyd E Dwiggins, et 4 Alo. 6089 Mrs Mildred L Parker VS Curtis R Burch - Sp 3589 Mrs LO Wiliams, Et al VS Myrtle Williams “Sp 3590 Mrs L O Williams VS Myrtle Williams, et a “No. 5466 Mary S Sloan VS Henry Grady S1Gdh 4+4ss<csesor ne a (No. 5604 Eula Myers Hayes VS William G Rayeg oseresese ee ee “No. 5771 Margaret M Thomas VS Lawrence A Thomas oe dio. 6144 Richard Lee Wilson, et al VS Edward Sheidt vee No. 6160 Mary Jane Barnes Shumake VS Ernest C Shumake, le ooo" No. 3892 John Campbell v3 M L Shannon, et @] -<<sees eet No. 4896 John Smith VS Robert Pierce & Bub Brewer pienangenanyy NO. 5429 Irene Morrison Little VS Clarence L Little Oa No. 5581 Earl Hill VS MC Goforth,et al Se ee ee Wo. 5933 Twin City Pontiac Co, Inc VS Fred L Styers --- Pre IN THE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 — Monday, December 5, 1955 . this Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday, December as 1955 at 10:00 otclock A. M. Jc, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into Open Court the names ¢ the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the 0 cond week of the November Term, 1955, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit? se i, Ce Cook E. M. Crawford Wash Mullis irs, Je Be Cooper Je A. Guy H. E. Moore " vy, Collins W. Johnston J. R. Redman i, ¥, Stroud W. A. Watts, Sr. James E. Brown alter S$. Sherrill R. G. Lippard Wayne H. Wilson J, F, Marlow Clyde T. Richardson A. C. Campbell J, Allen Edmiston J. T. Brown W. E. Bruce Vance Smith, Jr. J. R. Cagle Howard E. York J. H. Howard Fred Davis X, G. Newton (lifford T. Steele (. Ne Steele, Jr. Ernest Sharpe i, B. Robbins Paul W. Lambert Sherman Brumley LV, Carson Bruce Alexander J. F. Goforth i, C, Cook, Mrs. J. B. Cooper, M. G. Newton, E. M. Crawford, and J. H. Howard were cused by Doctor's Certificates. ‘lyde T, Richardson is a resident of Davie County. lash Mullis is incompetent. lalter S, Sherrill, H. E. Moore, and Fred Davis were excused by Court. The following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed as the iivoree Jury #1, to-wit: “ W. Collins N. W. Stroud Marlow J Alen Edminston Steele, Jr. 1. E. Robbins Clifford T. Steele G J. V. Carson uy Lippard "A Johnston W. A. Watts, Sr. tg gene - ms - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, December 5, 1955 4f6154, North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County December Term, 1955 Edith Lackey Walker Plaintiff vs ISSUES James Lee Walker Defendant I Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as albced in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. ii Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes. III Have te phintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County December Term, 1955 Edith Lackey Walker Plaintiff e JUDGMENT James Lee Walker Defendant rt b This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Hyde Court Olive, Judge Presiding and a Jury at the December Term, 1955 of the Superior n of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has bee tted 1° personally served with process, and the following issues having been subml and answered by the Jury: in the 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged Complaint? Answer: "Yes", 11s worth °8"° 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yeg" IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 a Monday, December 5, 1955 , 3, Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived Separate and apart from each for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? wher inswer: "Yes" iow, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, ’ uith Lackey Walker, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the iefendant, James Lee Walker, and the bonds of matriony hereto fore existing between ihe plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact, that re is one minor child of said marriage, James Robert Walker, who has been living uth his mother, the plaintiff, since the separation of his parents; and it further pearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that the Plaintiff is a fit ini suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor child,and that the best interest of said child would be served by being in the custody of his said mother; It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be and she is hereby granted full ind complete custody and control of said minor child until the further order of this Court» This 5th day of December 1955. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding ke Ke Ke Ke eK KK KK Kk KR KK OK A197 lorth Carolina In The Superior Court lredel] County inet 0, Meadows vs Wty K. Meadows 1, Has the plaintitr been a resident of the State of North Carolina for we than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes, 2. complaint? Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the Answer: Yes, eparate 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived sepa ection? apart Continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this @ Answer: Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK ------- NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Monday, December 5, 1955 North Carolina In The Superior Iredell County P Court Bruce C. Meadows vs Judgment ee e@ @ 8 ef Betty K. Meadows This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Hubert E. Olive, Judge Presiding over the November Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and being heard before said Honorable Hubert E. Olive, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted t, the Jury: 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the imtitution of this action? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plamtiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for eo years next preceding the institution of this actin’? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be forever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Betty K. Meadows, and that the costs € this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk. This 5th day of December, 1955. Hubert_E, Olive ——~Judge Presiding —_ ww we me Ke ek ok ok ke Ke we ok ember”) This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, Dee 1955, at 9:30 C'cloek A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, December 7, 1955 IN THE SUPERIOR couRT “ORT NA aout CAROL NOVEMBER 28, 1955 TERM |RBDELL COUNTY emesis » ¢, CHAMBERS and wife, HALLIE \ eS, H. CHAMBERS and wife, “nytt ERS s@OnkY CHAMBERS , Petitioners, vs «TH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY AND “J3L1¢ WORKS COMMISSION, a Respondent. ee ee ee ee re This cause coming on to be heard and heing heard before His Honor, Hubert &, (live, Judge Presiding, at the November 28, 1955, Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it) appearing to the court fror an examination of the record in this proceeding and frem other evidence presented and considered: That this proceeding was instituted on November 1, 1954, by the filing of a pition and the issuance of a summons; that summons was served on the respondent on Ty November 5, 19543 that on January 17, 1955, W. H. Chambers and wife, Dorothy chambers, were made parties to this proceeding and adopted the petiticn filed herein; what ll parties having or claiming an interest in the land involved in this cause are parties to the proceeding and are duly before the Court; that a map showing the location and boundary lines of the property of petitioners affected by the con- “ruction ofthe highway improvement designated as Projects No. 6374 and 6375, iredell County, has been filed in this proceeding; that report of commissioners “s filed in this proceeding on June 23, 1955; that exceptions were filed to said “port in apt time; that judgment was entered upon said report November 18, 1955, ‘erruling said exceptions and approving and confirming said report; that in apt +4 x A e ine notice of appeal from said judgment was given to Superior Couryof Iredell County's That. now Petitioners and respondent have reached an agreement whereby “SPendent has agreed to pay and petitioners have agreed to accept ithe sum of RT i “THI THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($11,500.00), together with other consideration “reinafter more fullydscribed, as just compensation for the taking of the “asement of d lands and for all right of wavy, with limitation of access, across sai ama ; 588 caused by the construction of the said projects. an That the North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission is aency and maintain a system of the State of North Carolina, authorized to construct of e of naa highways; that # has the power of eminent domain for the purpos Acqui the Wiring rights of way and easements in land reasonably necessary for Co e the struction, Protection and safety of said highways; that petitioners ar on the map; wne hown 8 Of the lands referred to and described in the petition and § IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, December 7, 1955 that the estate or interest acquired by the respondent for the Public use ; N saiq lands is an easement across said property as described and set out in the aa ings herein and shown on the map, the same bdng acquired by the respondent for the construction of the Statesville By-Pass wnder Projects No. 6374 and 6375, Iredell County; thatthe taking by the respondent was prior to November 9, 1954. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the respondent, North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission, was entitled to acquire and did acquire prior to November 9, 1954, by eminent domain the easement of right of way, with limitation of access, in ’ through, over, upon and across the land of the petitioners for all purposes for which said Commission, its successors and assigns, is authorized by law, to subject the same: that the description of the said tracts or parcels of land over which said easement was acquired is as follows: Those certain tracts of land situate, lying and being in Statesville Cutside Township, Iredell County, North Carolina, and more particularly descrihed as follows: TRACT NO. 1: Beginning at a stake in the East sde of the Statesville and Turnersburg Road in R. T. Holbrookst lire and running with the road North 5 degrees East 75 feet to a stake: thence parallel with te Holbrook line North 74 degrees East 246 feet to a stake: thence North 27 derrees West 337 feet to a stake; thence North 20 degrees Bast 100 feet, crossing the creek to a stake; thence down the East bank of creek 6 feet from the water edge South 25 East 188 feet to a stake in Holbrook's line; thence with said line South 7h West 396 feet, to the beginnine, containing 1-1/h acres more or less. The ahove-described tract is a part of Lot No. Fifty five (55), cf the S. J. Holland property as shown by the map of said property recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, in Plat Book 2, page 21: S. P. Frazier, having assigned and trans- ferred his bid on the above described tract to the grantors herein and requested that deed be made to them for said tract of land. TRACT NO. 23; Beginning at an iron pin on the East side of State Highway No. 21, W. C. Chambers' corner and running with his line North 74 East 3461 feet to the center of Fourth Creek; thence yo the center of said Fourth Creek South 2& bast 60 feet; thence as 74 West 120 feet to an iron pin: thence South 2/, East LO feet iron pins thence South 74 degrrees 30 minutes West 305 feet ith the iron pin on the East side of State Hichway No. 21: thence wb feet Bast, side of said highway North 9 degrees 30 minutes East 1 te, to the point of beginning, containing 77/100 acre, more or as being a part of the property of Mary H. Blackburn known as Sullivan Farm, : TRACT NO. 3: Beginning at a point 10-1/3 feet from the ae edge of N. C. Highway 21, W. C. Chambers corner in Shoema ta dine; thence North 4 degrees East 20 feet to a new corner a Shoemakers' line; thence North 78-4 degrees East 240 re 7h iron stake 50 feet from the bank of Fourth Creek; thence of Lot 40 West 249 feet to the point of beginning, and being 4 ee Book 2, 55 of the S. J. Hellandproperty as mapped andplatted in (Mg ager at page 31 and being a part of the property conveyed to and wife, Vera B. Shoemaker by S. P. Frazier. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1055 Wednesdav, December 7, 1955 CT NO, 4: Beginning at an iron pin on the Ea i Honway ST leading from Statesville to Elkin, ¥, ¢, cnparead corner and runnine with his line North 76 desrees 30 minutes East 305 feet to a stake, his corner; therce with his line North 24 West LO feet to an iron pin, his corner: thence Still with his line North 74 East 120 feet to the center of Fourth Creek: thence down the center of Fourth Creek South 24 Hast 490 feet to a stake in the center of the creek, Mrs. Blackhurn's new corner: thence a new line North 81 degrees 30 minutes West 700 feet to an iron pin on the East side of Highway 21, Mrs. Blackburnts new corner: thence with the East. side of said highwav, North 9 degrees 39 minutes East 150 feet to the beginning, containing 3-1/3 acres, more or less and being a part of the property inherited by Mrs. Mary H. Blackburn from her mother, Mrs. Pearl S. Holbrook. TRACT NO. 5: Beginning at a point in the center of Highway 21 leading from Statesville to Elkin, Charbers' corner and runs with the Chambers? line South 81 degrees 30 minutes East 691.2 feet to an iron in the center of Fourth Crek (for convenience an iron stake is placed on the West side of creek); thence following the center of Fourth Creek, approximately South 48 degrees 25 minutes East 500 feet and South 42 degrees 35 minutes East 110 feet to a point in the center of said creek; thence South 11] degrees 15 minutes Kast 99 feet to a point in the branch;thence witn the meanderings of the branch South 64 degrees 55 minutes West 335 feet and South 76 degrees 55 minutes West 600 feet and South 81 degrees 10 minutes West 1,00 feet to a point in the center of Highwav 21: thence with the center of Highway No. 2] North & degrees 24 minutes East #82 feet to the beginning, containing 17,1 acres, more or less. The same heing all of Let No, 27 of the Marv H. Blackburn property known as Addition to Brookdale, as the same is platted, planned and recorded in Flat Book No. 4, page 43, Iredell! vounty heristry. that the easement of right of way acouired over saia lands is as follows: That easement. of right of way necessary to sive the Statesville By-Pass as constructed under Projects No. 6374 and 6375 a parallel right-of-way width of 260 feet, measured 130 feet on each side of the survey center line thereof, (measured 103 feet north of and 15” feet sovth of the center line of the west-tound lane constructed under said projects); Plus an additional area of right of way outside said parallel right of way to provide for the traffic interchange ramp connecting the By-Pass with JS 1, lying south of the By-Pass and extending from the parallel right of way a distance of 50 feet from, and parallel to the center line of said inter- change ramp, and including all the area between the ramp and the aforesaid Parallel right of way; Plus an additional area for sight distance or visibility in Oe Td quadrant formed by the intersection of said interchang? ramp w} om di t being that area included within a line joining points lying 150 feet er each a southerly and an easterly direction, along the center lies, from the point of intersection of the center line of the traffic interchange ramp and the center line of US 21, and the eastern right-of-way WA ramp. of Us 21 and the southern right-of-wav boundary of the traffic interchang . All as Shown shaded in red on the map filed in this proceeding and being indicated hy concrete markers on the ground. 0), torethon grhat_ the sum of ELEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($11,500.00), “eas P with the assumption of the obligation to leave an opening er os rpretinge curth Creek so that the same may be used as a stock pass except ion water, is the full, fair and atiaeate value of and represents just conpenst on and ent of right of way, with limitation of access, in, over, up Nerth he lands of the d future use thereof by t na Petitioners and the past an d assigns 1 purt® Highway and Tublic Works Commission, its cucceseoraw to subject the Purposes f is authorized by di me, and or which the said Commission is ojects, including e linttars? ra damages caused by the construction of the said pro: , on of access, as aforesaid. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1955 Wednesday, December 7, 1955 3. That the North Carolina State Highway and Public Works respondent herein, in satisfaction of compensation due Petitioners fo, of right of way, with limitation of access, over said lands and for al) v®, cere caused by the construction of said projects, as aforesaid, acrees te damazes the Court hereby ordered to do the following: . © and is jy Commission, (a) Pay into Court for the use of the petitioners the FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($11,500.00). Sum of ELEVEN Toys) (b) Leave an opening under the bridge across Fourth Creek so that th may be used as a sock pass except at times of hich water, iim 4. That a copy of this judement be certified under the seal of the the Register of Deeds of Iredell County and be by him recorded among the ] records of Iredell County. , Court to and 5. That the respondent herein pay the costs of this action, This the 5th day of December, 1955, Hubert E. Olive UDG APPROVED AND CONSENTED TO: W. C. Chambers We C, CHAMBERS, PETITIONER Hallie Chambers HALLTE CHAMBERS, PaTITIONER W. H,. Chambers We H. CHAMBERS, PETITIONER Dorothy Chambers DOROTHY CHAMBERS — PETITIONER Land, Sowers & Avery trivette, Mitchell & Holshouser By Neil S. Sowers ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONERS Land, Sowers & Avery Trivette, Mitchell & Holshouser By Neil S. Sowers ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONERS R. Brooks Peters ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT McLaughlin & Battley By: W. R. Battle 1 ATTORNEYS: FOR RESPONDENT ——— eK KKK KK KK OK KK See Cont inueds Elizabeth C Campbell VS Hugh J Campbell -------------- ” Continued Floyd Isenhour VS Thelma DeVier Isenhour Continued John T Eller, BNF M L Nash VS Marjorie M Eller rT = Contimel Leroy Pope VS McLean Trucking Co, Ine Eo Cont Ray A Piercy VS Edd Ray Stroud & Mrs Robert Ivey eee. Contin John Rondville Turner VS Edward Sheidt --------------""" att Pauline P Gryder VS Donald Gpyder: <e seses~e shone ae Contin P McNeer Dillon, et al VS Clyde E Gaither, Sr et al --- Contin! Rama C Burner VS James E Little --------------------"7" eae Contin Darrell McDaniels VS Ruth M McDaniels 6003 6133 6196 5779 5832 6043 5934 6153 6158 6175 This Honorable Court is adjourned sine-die. 5 vife, 153 In the Superior Court ttn carolina ° ? iredell County > KeNeer Dillon and wife, n ielen B. Dillon, Plaintiffs, v8. ‘ede E. Gaither, Sr., and ie iiian M. Gaither, Defendants, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable ',G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court from the satenent of the attorneys for the plaintiffs and the defendants, that the matters ni things in controversy in the above-entitled action have been settled between the mrties and that the plaintiffs have elected to take a non-suit in this action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiffs be non- suited and be taxed with the costs of this action. This the 28th day of November, 1955. C. G. Smith Cierk of Superior Court kok kk Ke KK OK KK KOK OK #149 HORT H CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TEDELL COUNTY ‘tednont Lumber and anufacturing Co, Inc. vs, i K. Sprinkle k of TRIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smih, Cler Court that werior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the s have been N matters and controversies between the parties arising upon the pleading muled, and the plaintiff has elected to take a non-suit in this action. and Avery, Attorneys for the It is, therefore, on motion of Land, Sowers, owed to take a Maintite, ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the plaintiff be all non- “suit, and the Plaintiff is hereby non-suited. This the 2¢th day of November, 1955. Cc. G. Smith Court of Irede Clerk of Supenieth carolina County, North ke RR KR RK KR OK KK KF 141,503 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPER IREDELL COUNTY IOR COURT L. G. Nash Plaintiff Vs. H. M. Morrison, Mrs. Mattie Mae Morrison and George W. Absher, and W. P. Nash, Administrators of J. W. Nash Defendants THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before C, G. Smith, Cler; Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that this is ar action upon a judgment brought by one of the sureties who paid the Judgment and ha the same transferred and assigned to a trustee for his benefit and that this action is for a renewal of the said judgement and for contribution against the co-surety, It is therefore, by consent of the parties, ordered, adjudged and decreed -hit the plahtiff recover of the principals H. M. Morrison and Mrs. Mattie Mae Morrison the sum of $399.10, with interest from February 2, 1937 until paid, and for $10,% and for the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, and which said judgment for § the promissoryliability of H. M. Morrison and Mrs. Mattie Mae Morrison, and that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, George W. Absher and W, P, Nash, Administrators of J. W. Nash, one-half of the said amount as co-endorsers. The plaintiff, however, to exhaust the promissory liability of H. M. Morrison and vile, Mattie Mae Morrbon, before execution shall be issued against the defendants Seor: W. Absher and W. P, Nash, Administrators of J. W. Nash, for one-half of said jugs as co-endorsers and surety. This the 28 day of November, 1955. C. G. Smith Judge Presiding By consent: Land, Sowers & Avery Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorneys for the plaintiff Scott& Collier By Collie Scott & Collier, Attorneys for defendants George W. Absher and W. P. Nash, Administrators of J. W. Nash. Ke ek ek wk ke Ok Ok ke OK f : ea carolina, | In the Superior Court, jredell County j Before the Clerk, mendia We York (audia "plaintiff, Ye. JUDGMENT F janes Coyt York, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that summons was returned unserved, and that the plaintiff desires to a voluntary non suits It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and ithe same is hereby non-suited and dismissed, at the costs of the plaintiff. This December 2nd, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court, Iredell Ccunty, North Carolina. woe Ke Kk KK KK KK OK OK OK OK OK OK #6208 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COUR IREDELL COUNTY | lenoir Finance Company, Plaintiff nee JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT hobby Monroe Fox, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior ‘art of Iredell County, on this the 20th day of December, 1955, and it appearing ' ; ; ndant © the court that the plaintiff has made a satisfactory adjustment with the defe alleged iid that none of them now make any claim growing out of the matters and things g in the Complaint: of It is, therefore, upon motion of the plaintiff and on representation : DERED Haintifets counsel that the parties to this action have been satisfied, OR ’ J is d OUDGED AND DECREED that thigaction be, and the same is hereby non-suited an ‘ismissed, The Plaintirer is taxed for the cost of this action. C._G. Smith —prerk-oF Superior Court ee eee eeeen ee £8 146176 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court Before the Clerk Thomas & Howard Company of Hickory, Inc., Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT Lewis L. Wilson, Trading and doing business as Wilson's Market, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this Sth day of December, 1955, on the motion of Adams, Dearmon and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: 4 That on October 25, 1955, the plaintiff filed a duly verified Complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel] County. oie That Summons was issued from this Court on October 25, 1955, to the Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, and was returnable as provided by law. ata That the Summons was served on the defendant by Perrye Goodrum, Deputy Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, on October 29, 1955, by leaving with thodefendant a copy of the Summons, together with a copy of the Complaint. a That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the tine allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. -5- That the verified Complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a Sum certain act money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the coni? aed and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itend of the verified statement, marked "Exhibit A," was attached to, and made a part of the Complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date credits purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and arising out of the transaction. ailne That the Court finds from the duly verified Complaint, and the a," that the of the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and a of n the sum itemised verified statement attached to the Complaint, marked "EXhibit merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit Ay 481 sre Hundred Fifty-two Dollars Sixty-four Cents ($552.64), together with interest shereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from November 24, 1953, until paid. It IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff vecover Of the defendant, Lewis L. Wilson, Trading and doing business as Wilson's urket, the sum of Five Hundred Fifty-two Dollars Sixty-four Cents ($552.6i), sorether with interest thereon at the rate of sx per cent per annum from November i 1953, until paid, and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County, against the defendant. This the 5th day of December, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina we mK Hw mw we me kK ok Kk Ok Kk Ok OK $5872 YORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ?, §, West Construction ‘company, Ince, and the tone Insurance Company of New York, Plaintiffs Ve Dixon & Christopher vorpany, Inc. Defendant BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY, ‘RTH CAROLINA: This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Clerk the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the ‘lerk from the Statements of the attorneys for the plaintiffs and the attorneys ud ‘he defendant that all matters and things in controversy alleged in the complaint, "which might have been alleged, have been compromised, agreed upon, and apnniee, Now, therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the plaintiffs’ “tion be and it is hereby dismissed, and that the defendant shall pay the costs “this action to be tzxed by me. This the 10 day of December, 1955. Ce G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Iredell County, North Carolina “NSENTED AND AGREED TO: TIMER & RAYMER Q A. B. Raymer Ittorneys- for Plaintit¥e—— os NITY 7 MOORE, SMITH & POPE ve ve B M Hunt eke EK RK KK KR KK RK KF JFLILES NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Harry Brody, Plaintiff VS. JUDGMENT OF VOLU} Bahia M. Fakoury, LUNTARY NONSUIT trading and doing business as Bahia's Shoppe, Mooresville, N. C. Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearine to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, by the defendant paying to the plaintiff the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00), and the plaintiff agreeing to pay the Court costs; and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit: IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, UPON motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff te nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of Court. This the 13th dav of December, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Tredel) County, North Carolina. CONSENTED TO: Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, By: C. B. Winberr MEMBER OF FIRM. ‘eek Ke Kk KK KK KK KK 4155 yorth Carolina In the Superior Court tredell County d . i yestmoreland an raha yestmoreland tlh yooresville Roofing { Company id Heat ing Plaint iffs Judgment vs i, spencer McLaughlin and ts Kay Be McLaughlin nn, ae Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, C. G. Smith, Clerk if the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon the motion of William S. Neel, ittorney for the plaintiffs, for judgment against the defendants by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 4th day of October, 19553; and that an alias summons was issued on the 27th day of October, 1955; And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of the complaint was served on each of the defendants in said action on the 29th day of ktober, 19553 And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading és been filed by either of the defendants and no extension of time to file pleadings us been granted to either of the defendants and that the time within which pleadings wy be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the ‘ise of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay 4 sum of money ‘xed by the contract, namely, the sum of Seven Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($700.00), "th interest thereon from the 10th day of January, 1955; “ therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiffs have Kay B. McLaughlin, the 10th "recover of the defendants, H. Spencer Mclaughlin and wife, “of Seven Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($700.00), with interest thereon from the ta of January, 1955, and the costs of this action. This lath day of December, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court Kk eK KK Kk Kk KK KK OK KK OK 146183 North Carolina In Iredell County the Superior Court The First National Bank of Mooresville, North Carolina Plaintiff vs Calvin C. Compton, Sue Compton and Mrs. J. G. Compton er ee See See Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, C, G Smith, Cler: , > . . ’ er! of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon the motion by William S$, Nee), Attorney for the plaintiff, for judgment against the defendants by default final: And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and Summons issued in this action on the 2nd day of November, 1955; And it further appearing to the court that said Summons together with a copy of the complaint were served on each of the defendants on the Ath day of Novenber, 19553 And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by either of the defendants and that no extension of tine to file pleadings has been granted to either of the defendants and that the tine within which pleadings may be filed by either of the defendants has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complant that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Seven Hundred Ninety and No/100 Dollars ($790.00) with interest thereon from the 20th day of July, 1955; NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff mr and recover of the defendants, Calvin C. Compton, Sue Compton, and Mrs. J. 4 Compton, the sum of Seven Hundred Ninety and No/100 Dollars ($790.00), with interes! thereon ftom the 20th dav of July, 1955, and the costs of this action. C. G. Smith erk of the Superior Court koe KR OK ek ke Kk ke we ek Kk This 14 day of December, 1955. #181 yoRtH CAROLINA ga0KLL COUNTY lie Company Hough Wyre “Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT oe JUDGMENT tgrnon Gillespie, T/A iillespie Electric Co. Defendant THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment wainst the defendant by default final; And it appearing to te Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 31st day of October, 1955; And it further appearing to the Court that said summons, together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 10th day of November, 1955; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and there was no extension of time to file pleadings eranted: And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the ‘ause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Three Hundred Twelve and 56/100 ($312.56), iollars, with interest thereon from the 29th day of December, 1954; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have ind recover of the defendant the sum of Three Hundred Twelve and 56/100 Dollars 312.56), with interest thereon from the 29th day of December, 1954, and the Costs of this action. This lith day of December, 1955. C. Ge Smith _ Slerk of the Superior Court ee eeeeagaeEgHR KE ee * * 446182 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Cary C. Boshamer, Plaintiff vs JUDGMENT George H. Malcolm and wife, Virginia D. Malcolm, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior ¢ vour of Iredell County upon the verified complaint of the plaintiff, and it appearing to the court that this action was instituted on November lst, 1955, and that “ of the vetfied complaint and summons was served on each of the defendants on November 2nd, 1955; that more than thirty days have elasped and the defendants have failed to answer or otherwise plead in the cause; it further appears to the court that the defendants are indebted to the Plaintiff in the sum of FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY-SEVEN AND NO/100 ($427.00) DOLLARS WITH interest at Six per cent fror June 22nd, 1955, until paid; It is, therefore, ORDERED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $427.00 with interest at six per cent from June 22nd, 1955, until paid and that they be taxed withthe cost of this action. This the loth day of December, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell] County. kek Ke RK KK Ke KK OK OK ‘46018 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Statesville Flour Mills Company, Plaintiff -vs- Ralph C. Stanley and Mary E. Stanley, Defendants jor Cou This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Supt! aring % of Iredell County upon the verified complaint of the plaintiff, and it _ of the the court that this action was instituted on April 7th, 1955, and that cory J : on Apri verified complaint and sommons was served on defendant, Mary &. Stanley, = re ¢ ° mo: 15th, 1955, and on defendant, Ralph C. Stanky, on April 27th, 195); ic rwise thirty days have elasped and the defendants have failed to answer OF othe . are plead in the cause: it further appears to the court that the defendants | ousAND BIGHT HUNT indebted to the plaintiff corporation in the sum of THREE TH . from Deces? FOUR AND NO/100 ($3,801.00) DOLLARS, with interest at Six Per Cent 10th, 1954, unti paid; It is, therefore, ORDERED AND DECREED that the plaintiff corporation over of the defendants the sum of $3,804.00 wth interest at six per cent from rec secenber 10th, 1954, until paid, and that they be taxed with the cost of this action, this the 20th day of December, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. Kk Ke we Re Ke KK OK KK Ke Kk ok ok ok Ab] ORTH CAROLINA REDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ithel Fe McNeely, Nancy B. jabriel and Anne McNeely tirsfeld, T/A Mooresville (il Company Plaintiffs " JUDGMENT Yisenheimer Brothers, Incorporated; D. A. Misenheimer; , Ae Misenheimer and E. B. isenheimer a ee a ee ee ee ee ee Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon the motion by William S. Neel, ittorney for the plaintiffs, for judgement against the defendants by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons ‘sued in this action on the llth day of November, 1955; “the complaint were served on each of the defendants on the 14th day of November, 19553 And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or other Pleading has been filed by either of the defendants and that no extension of time © file pleadings has been eranted to either of the defendants and that the time "thin which Pleadngs may be filed by either of the defendants has expired; And it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the ¢ 7 f “use of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay 4 Sum o ‘ : 00 nMy fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Nine Hundred Eighty Six and 15/1 D . silars ($986.15) with interest thereon from the 2nd day of September, anet fs NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintif - Ae baal of the defendants, Misenheimer Brothers, Incorporated, D e sum of Nine Hundred Nise Mheimer, c, A, Misenheimer, and E. B. Misenheimer, th m the 2nd day of Ligh a Six and 15/100 Dollars ($986.15), with interest thereon fro “ePte mer, 1954, and the costs of this action. This 20 day of December, 1955. C, Ge Smith arese oT tt superior Court Keke RK KR EK RK KKK KF 46147 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, Plaintiff -VS- JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Je B. Eller and Hazel D. Eller, — eee ee 8 ee ee Defendants This cause coming on to be heard hefore the undersigned Clerk Of Superior Court of Iredell County, on this the 2&th dav of December, 1955, and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff has made a satisfactory adjustment with the defendants and that none of them now make any claim growing out of the matters and things alleged m the complaint: It is, tnerefore, upon motion of the plaintiff and on representation of plaintff's counsel that the parties to this action have been sati isfied, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action be, and the same is hereby non-suited and dismissed. The plaintiff is taxed with the cost of this action. This the 28th day of December, 1955. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court ek Kk ee ke oe ee oe ke oe kk M#$6197 Nerth Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County Bruce C. Meadows vs Judgment Betty K. Meadows This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Hubert E. Olive, dud? . : heard Presiding over the November Civil Term 1955 Iredell Superior Court, and being before said Honorable Hubert E. Olive, and a Jury, the following issues were Submitted to the Jury: for 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? | laint 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in thetomP ' seperat 3- Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived of! this act! and apart continuously for two vears next preceding the institution of The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". bonis the 00° It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that 7 t be of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendan ulo fron t and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vine taxed ag@! ev er dissolved, cs defendant, Betty K. Meadows, and that the costs of this action be plaintiff by the Clerk, And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact, that ig two children of said marriage, Clifto Meadows, and Marsha Meadows, Clifton rhere vadovs living with the plaintiff and Marsha Meadows who has been living with her a" the defendant, since the separation of her parents: and it further appearing “ the Court and the Court finding as a fact that the defendant is a fit and suitable wson to have the custody and control of said minor child, and that the best terest of said child would be served by being in the custody of her said mother; It is therefore ordered that the defendant he and she is hereby eranted full snd complete custody and control of said minor child, until the further order of this Court. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 7th dav of December, 1955. Hubert E. Olive Judge Presiding #89 ‘orth Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. iM, Gaither, Plaintiff, Vs, ‘ay Cartner, Defendant. ; i d This cause coming on te be heard, and being heard hefore the undersigne fn » . ~ ° $ YY arin to the ‘lerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appe 6 4p tters “ut that the plaintiff and defendant have acreed upon a settlement of the ma an : in the nd things set forth in the complaint, said agreement being as set forth fa) : : ‘owing Judgment: ' i the It is therefore ordered and adjudged by consent of the parties that Paints ” ether with interest “antiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $337.49, toget “Om the lith day of February, 1953, until paid. fa be issued It is further adjudged that no execution on this judgment shall Provi fore the OVided that the defendant pays one-half of the amount of said judgment be Ist re November 1, 1957- ao November, 1956, and the remaining one-half on or befo ed *fendant is taxed with the costs of this action. "Ms the 3rd day of January, 1956. Cs on Smith ~% 6 Clerk of ovperior Cour County, North Carolina. f Irede A, M i ainty sther C At wis ‘Orne Y for efendant ee ae a ee + oe *