Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1954 oo tar oe 2s! 2 ete ete ee a ee 6 es ¥\4 4 wd . i a f ‘ 4 : hela a ; d 1 4 i q | i i ¥ en ) i 4 : s ; } ' \ I “ i t | wet ; : Le vie " i # { ; ! i iia} i} } aL ‘ | i i ' | 4 : j 4 ; F n . Salads that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiffts statement marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Eleven Hundred Dollars and no cents (31,100.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 3, 1952, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Arthur Keith Shealy, trading and doing business as Keith's Department Store, the sum of Lleven Hundred Dollars and no Cents, ($1,100.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 3, 1952, until paid, together with coets of this action taxed by the vourt. This the 17th dav of December, 1953. C. G, Smith Vlerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Fall Term, 1953 No. 378 Iredell County Larry 0. Shives VS. I X James M, Sample and W. W. Winters | t/a S & W Trucking Co. This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion that there is -- error in the record and proceedings ¢ said Superior Court. It is therefore, cosidered and adjuiged by the vourt here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable Jeff. D. Johnsm, Ut, Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS REVERSED And it is considered ani adjudged further, that tae plaintiff dopay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, t0 wit, the sum of Two and 70/100 dollars ($2.70), and execution issue therefa A TRUE COPY Adrian J, ‘ewton Clerk of the Supreme vourte day Filed in office of Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County on the 5th C. G. Smith C, Gs Saith come “ee he ee mh mH of January, 1954, Mo, 5502 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Winifred Oscar Wright vs Maxine Gladys Wright This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks tht they be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being alloved to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, This the lst day of January, 1954. C, G, Smith Clerk Superior Court ‘Wo. 5246 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Statesville Gin Company vs JUDGMENT t. L. Shoemax er This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersiened Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing ‘o the Court that summons and claim and delivery were issued on March 5, 1952 and that the Sheriff's return made on March 6, 1952 shows that no proj erty "as taken by him; tht the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the “tion be and the same is hereby nonsuited and the plaintiff taxed with the Costs, This the Ist day of January, 1954. UG. G, Smith Clerk Superior Court “eee KK eK /No. 5227 NORTH CAROLINA na tl IREDELL COUNTY Neva Sommers Hoover VS. Lloyd H. doover + Naees nee a ee ene oka agentes mana plaintiff has that right; ‘No. 5106 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Ruby ©. White vs aS ae Yates S. White me eee ee et ORE ane. ata? koe hee te Sane to take a voluntary nonsuit. ia! that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This the lst day of January, 1954. This the lst day of January, 1954. eR KK KR me mR me KK IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT BEFORE THE CLERK This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the and it appearing to the vourt that the plaintiff desires to take a to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court ee KKK KK mK HK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK JUDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that they | 1] be allowed to take a voluntary non suit, and it appearing to the Court i, i 1 that the plaintiff has that right; | It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court tat this ; Hy Cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed | It is further ordered and adjudged by the i that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. C. G, Smith County, undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that they be allowed cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed to 4 Fy, r take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court Court ——t ’ cour igi fcbbRegs tare Celie MNO. 5479 yorTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK D B. Mason vs William (Bill) Hartness : | JUDGMENT ) and Thomas EB. Hartness ; This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of fredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court-.and asks that they be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the vourt that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This the lst day of January, 1954. GC. G, Smith Clerk Superior Court me Ke Ke KK KM KKK HM No. 5531 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Ola Mae Mullis Padgett I - i JUDGMENT Horace Nathaniel Padcett ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Ncrtl “srolina, md it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary “onsuit, and comes into t is Court and asks that they be allowed to take ‘ Voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plantiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Vourt that this “us¢ be, and the Same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed to bed. Voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court “at the Plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This the lst dav of Januarv, 195/. be G. Smith C —tierk Superior court — * )e ke ee eR ee OM eee enema A ates A — - i es —_ ~« -_— - +23 ‘No. 5570 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Zora Annie Mayberry vs. Clifford Lee Mayberry This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it apvearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into tlic Ccu~* and asks that they be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff hase that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that tiis cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is futher ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This the lst day of January, 1954. C, G, Smith vlerk Superior Court mee Ke KK we KK HK HK No. 5315 NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK Theresa O'Neill Campbell | vs i JUDGMENT James William Campbell ' This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Vourt that the plaintiff desires to take a volunter] nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that they be allowed to take @ voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this Cause be, and the same ishereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being al lowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudge plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This the lst day of Yanuary, 1954. C. G, Smith he or core s **e#eeeneeese geese set No. 5317 yORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY lvia Benfield Hutchins MF Baxter H. Finch IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK vs Richard Hutchins This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Yourt and asks that they be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this ause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This the lst day of January, 1954. CG. G, Smith Clerk Superior Court i No, 5507 NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK i{lantic Furniture Products Co, vs, lewis Haver t/a redel) furniture Co. This cause Coming on to be heard and being heard before the un , dersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and {t appearin- to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary Q suit, and comes into v PLuntary nonsuit, right; Court and asks that they be allowed to take a and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that .; It 4s, therefore, ordered ani adjudged by the Court that this Sige be » and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed to Cluntary Honsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court the costs of this action. This the lst day of January, 1954. Cc. G t er uperior Court one a er eg ren - teat : eRe ae en iY eat RS Som Se a i $ i a ~~ m= Ut tie ot eee at 6 4 . wows toe “No. 5336 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK John Plain & Company VS. D. W. Scott T/A Mooresville Bakery This matter coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that this matter was heard before H. S. Douglass, Justice of te Peace and appeal having been taken by the defendant and it further ap pearing that the defendant desires to withdraw his appeal from tis Court; It is, therefore, orddred and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be allowed to withdraw his appeal in this action remanded to the Justice of Peace Court and that the defendant be taxed with the costs of this court. This the lst day of January, 1954. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court eseenen une ee aK KH . No. 3064 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: CG. M, Veaton vs. ! ! The Mooresville Building & Loan ! Association i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard upon the plead ings and on the motion ofplaintiff for judgment in accordance with the prayer of the complaint, and it being made to appear to the Court and the Court finding from the pleadings that the defendant Association has suspended its ordinary business on account of restriction placed on it by the Insurance Commissioner of the State of North Carolina, that demands have been made by the shareholders to surrender their stock and have paid to them the moneys in accordance with the By-Laws of the “ssociation, that the Association 18 unable to meet these demands because of the restriction as aforesaid and thet it is for the best ‘nterest of the creditors ani the shareholders that the defendant Association be dissolved: dant Tt is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed thaf the oy be forthwith dissolved and that this judgment be and it hereby is made an order of dissolution of The Mooresville Building and Loan Associations It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that all pa@sons, firms or corporations be and they are enjoined and restrained from instituting any suit against said Association or in any manner interfering with the assets of said Association or with the Trustee herein appointed to take possession of said assets in the discharge of his duties as such, It is further ordered, ad judged and decreed that A. W. Uolson be and he ig hereby avpointed as Trustee to take charge of the assets of The no resville Building and Loan Association, collect all debts now due or here- after to become due to it and to bring such suits and make slaes of such property pledged ty the defendant as may be necessary or expedient in omer to collect the debts due or to become due to it and to wind un and liquidate the affairs and oroperty of the defendant in an orderly manner and to pay all reasonable and necessary expenses for the purpose of liquidating the busi- ness and assets of the defendant Association, to pay its debts and to distribute its net cash assets from time to time among its stockholders, as the Jourt may hereafter direct. The trustee wil] within thirty (3) days from this date file with the vlerk of this Court an inventory or statement of4l1l the assets of the defendant Association, the amount of debts ving by it, the number of shares issued by the Association and Outstancing, with the date when the certificates were issued, the amounts paid thereon, and any other information which may be per-inent. It further appearing to the Court that a large part of the assets of the Association consist of reel estate in Mooresvills Iredell County, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Trustee be and he is hereby **corized and empowered with the written assent of C. A. Mayhew, C. P, McNeely, *.W. Colson, R, W, Troutman, md H. P, Deaton, a Committee selected by the Yirectors for that purpose, to sell any of the saii real estate for cash or m such terms as may be for the best interest of the creditors and share- holders of the Association. The Trustee will publish notice of his appointment once a week for * Period of Four (4) weeks, in some newspaper published in Iredell County and Ml, in said notice, direct all creditors of the Association to file their ‘laine with him and all shareholders of the Association to present their pass book * to him in order that he may pass upon any disputed questions and report et¥on to ‘he Court for further orders with respect thereto. via The Trustee and the Committee hereinbefore appointed wil, prior uly Term ofthe Iredell Superior Court, appraise and value all of the of the Association and partialarly the real estate, so that the Court n ay determine what ba t lance each mortgagor shall be required to pay in order ° dise harge and Cancel his mortgage. Te Trustee is authorized and empowered to employ such Persons to carry out the terms and provisions of this order and to incur such expense, including reasonable Vonsel fees, as may be necessary in the execution of the trust hereby impresses upon him. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Trustee shal] receive as compensation for his services the sum of $100.00 per month unti] otherwise directed by the Court, said monthly sum shall be retained by hin out of any money in his possess:on as Trustee. He is also authorized and directed to pay the premium on the bund hereby required of him and any costs which may be incurred in this proceeding. Before entering upon the performance of his duties as Trustee he shall give good and sufficient bond, conditioned as required by law, for the faithful discharge of his duties in the sum of Twenty (20) Thousand Vollars. Frank M, Armstron Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District. eK Ke Ke Ke me KK Kk we Ke kK No. 5557 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Theresa Campbell, Plaintiff Vs. James W, Campbell, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the Honorable Carl G, Smith, Clerk of Iredell County Superior Court upon plaintiff's Motion to remove this action from Iredell County to Alexander County, for the convenience of the plaintiff and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change, and it appearing from the plaintiff's motion that this is ™ uncontested action for an absolute divorce upon the ground of two years separation; It is now ordered that this action be removed for trial from Iredell County to the Superior Court of Alexander County, for trial. G, G, Smi ourt erk of t uperior Iredell County. eK KK eH Noe 5688-A IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, DECEMBER TERM, 1953. yortH CAROLINA , iiKes COUNTY. William R. Marlowe wi JUDGMENT clara Everidge Marlowe This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Wilkes Younty, North Carolina, before His Honor, Dan K, Moore, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, William R. Marlowe, and the defendant, Clara Everidge Marlowe, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Dan K. Moore Judge Presiding. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Wilkes County OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT I, Cora Caudill, Clerk of the Superior Court of Wilkes County, State of North Carolina, which Court is a Court of Record, having an official seal, which is hereto affixed, do hereby certify the foregoing and attached (one \}) sheets) to be a true copy of the Judgment of Divorce in the case of MILLIAM R. MARLOWE vs. CLARA EVERIDGE MARLOWE as the same is taken from and Compared with the original now on file in this office. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Superior Court of Wilkes Vounty at my office in Wilkesboro, North “Tolina, this the twenty second (22) day of Becember, in the year of our “rd, 1954, K9 Cora Vaudill ™ Clerk Superior Court F fled in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for the County * Tredeli | “tate of North Sarolina on the 13th day of January A. D. 1954 and ’ eorded in Book 31 of Minutes on page 189 Public records of said Vounty. Martha D, Parker eputy Vierk mek we wk em me Ow em (No. 5631 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County The Springs Cotton Mills, Plaintiff VS. Walter F, Miller, Defendant This cause coming on to he heard before th Honorable ©. G. Smith, Vlerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; and, It appearing to the Vourt that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in tis action on the 23rd day of October, 1953; and, It further appearing to the Court ——... together with a copy of said complaint was served on the defendant, Walter E. Miller, on the 26th day of Uctober, 1953; and, It further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer or othe pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file plead'ngs has been rranted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; and, It further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an expressed contract to pay for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff tothe defendant and that there is now due and owing by the defendant to the plaintiff for said goods 80 sold aid delivered, the sum of $1,546.88 with interest on $1,230.90 from April 30, 1953 and interest on $315.98 from June 10, 1953 until paid. Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjuiged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, Walter E, Miller, the sum of $1,546.88 together with interest on $1,230.90 from April 30, 1953, until paid ani interest on $315.98 from June 10, 1953, until paid, and the costs of this action, This the 16th day of January, 1954. C, G. Smith 7 Clerk Superior Vourt eee KH eRe Kee He kK eR OH Ho. 5219 yoRTH CAROLINA, In the Sure rior Court IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Southern Friction “aterials Company, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Klutz-Schafer Furniture Company, Incorporated , Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undereipred Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appear- ing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attomeys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and canpromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit: IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, upon w' wu of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of Court. This the 16th day of January, 1954. C, G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. CONSENTED TO: ims, Dearman and Winberry ‘torneys for the Plaintiff, NY: Monroe Adams xe KK KK Ke Ke eH tor ee ae — —— eae Saco aieet eons 4. ee s oo ae . a “No. 5567 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR Cour? IREDELL vu OUNTY d's Inc. ere'e Plaintiff vs. Jack W. Morrison et al. Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C, G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County, North Varolina, and it appearing to the court that the plaint&f and the defendant, Jack W. Morrison, have reached an agreement in this action as to the sum that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff; and it appearing to the court that such azreement is that the defendant has consented to pay the sum of Une Hundred amd no/100 ($100.00) Dollars to the plaintiff in full satisfaction of tie debt and costs in tiis action which has been agreed to by the plaintiff; Now, therefore, by consent, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, ard decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, Jack W, Morrison, the sum of One Hundred and no/100 ($100.00) Dollars; that the plaintiff pay the costs in this action; that the order of attachment and order of garnishment issued in this cause be hereby disolved and vacated This 15 day of Jan, 1954. Vonsented to: Wn. I Ward, Jr. Kttorney for the Plaintif?r Baxter H, Finch Attorney for the Defendant CG. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court ee ee ee | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, January 25th, 1954 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the asth day of January, 1954, at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. when and where His Honor J. A..Rousseau, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, 1954, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. is present amd opened Court by order of the Court. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, J, C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court the name of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for the January Term, 1954, First Week, to-wit: and for a Grand Jury to serve for a six months period ending June 30th, 1954, to-wit: W, H. Morrison Mrs, Virginia S, Allen R. D, Grier Mrs. Clara S, Tharpe i, E, McLean, Jr. Coite Brady Troy Taylor, Jr. WH. Wright ‘. H. Surratt ¥. G. Gaither Mrs. J. T, Alexander J. A. White D.W. Riddle William A, Hethcox LW. Hostetler Nede M. Hoover Horace Howard Roes Nicholson B. E. Bollinger Gilbert E. Brotherton W. C. Morgan C. L. Weston C. E. Stikeleather William T. Comer, Jr. H. E. Massey Robert W. Kerr C. D, Poole K. B, Lamberth L. Little M, H. Mason Quince Martin K, F. Holland C. A, Lippard C. G. Mills Thomas E. Grose F. J. Ostwalt N. D. Benfield Homer Troutman H. C. Horne Sam Wilson C. E. Miller Vance Goble A. F. Orren Roy P. Sherrill Robert W. Adkins Willie E. Wiley B. G. Kurfees Mrs. W. M. Meadows W. H. Parsons Eldin Meacham John F, Tutt G, P. Lewis Harry D. Gabriel L. H. Hollar, Jr. R, D, Grier, Mrs. Clara S, Tharpe and William A. Hethcox were excused by the Couwt, Cia r Lippard and A. v. Orren were excused by Dr.'s certificates. R 7, 1 Sherril} lives in Alexander County. eens - ee iienietnte ince - an rf = : =s5 Se I na sree NNR I a ‘ a ae a 3 Wi} lie E. Wiley is deceased. homes a e er John PF » Tutt lives in Catawba County. ‘ry D, Gabrie] a AER a ae alata deBbinen - - a aa was excused by Statute. »?P "rsons was excused by the Court. eA ——.— + SS sere cee ccs .. teat ee ee : a ’ — ail ie —* fon) - a5 ae a Rey (= fied tag SS Ve uz —_—-_ nag, cS eed : MA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 195), Monday, January 25th, 1954 The following good and lawful men and women were duly drawn and sworn a3 the Grand Jury to serve for the six months period ending June 30, 195, ’ to-wit: Ross Nicholson Robert W. Kerr Mrs. W. M. Meadows Mrs. Virginia S, Allen Mrs. J. T. Alexander L. W. Hostetler Kurfees Troy Taylor, Jr, Gaither M. H. Mason Morrison C. L. Weston Miller Robert W. Adkins White B. E. Bollinger Eldin Meacham H. E, McLean, Jr, L. W. Hostetler was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. J. B. Goforth was sworn as Officer in charge of the Grand Jury. The following were sworn as talesmen jurors for the week: M. L. Williams T W. G. McLelland nal ‘ewe gs Ms Arey J. P. Patterson 4No. 1103 State vs_ Guy Ramsey No. 1415 otate vs slifford Jharles Hall ‘No. 1422 State vs Matk Miller ‘No. 1616 State vs J. 0. Gray ‘No. 1644 State vs Troy Fesperman ‘No. 1724 State vs L. D. Wall Wo. 1734 State vs Willard L Dison sc A, S. U, Clarence Redmond Douglass Campbell black, Jr. B. M. Sprinkle vampbell Roy Sharpe D. Ps Barker James Cook J. M. “orrow FALSE PRETENCE (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. FORGERY (COMPLIANCE) { Defendant called and failed. Judgment Ms Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. DRIVING DRUNK (COMPLIANCE) Wisi Defendant called and failed. Judgment Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Vapias ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT (COMPLIANCE) is! Defendant called and failed. Judgment N Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. ABANDON & NON-§UPPORT Alias Capias. DRUNK & DISORDERLY Alias Capias. No. 1774 State vs L L (Bill) Lackey Wo. 1775 State v8 Cameron Harrison flo. 1831 State vs Reath Taylor flo, 1843 State vs Bill Jones Nog, 26 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «--- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, January 25th, 1954, (Cam) Hayes g nastat XSunders Spann io. 1879 State vs Amos ‘ucker No. 1881 State vs J. C, Kennerly Wo, 1986 State vs James Campbell ‘No. 1887 State vs luther White No. 189) State vs Coyte Hou ston No, 1899 State ve Seorge Harris Yo, ) Stare” V8 vharles Henry Knox Yo. 3 Staten” vs ohn Everette Garris PERMIT MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR ON HIS PROPLRTY Continued under former order. MANUFACTURE LIQUOR (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON (COMPLIA\ CE) Judgment complied with. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Vapias. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. FALSE PRETENCE (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT (COMPLIANCE) Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Instanter Alias Capias. BASTARDY (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. DRUNK Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa & Capias. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ==-- JANUARY TERM, 195, Monday, Yanuary 25th, 195, / No. 1968 | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY (COMPLIANcE) State ] Defendant called and failed, Jud gment vs | Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. nt Misi Bristol Rash | INo. 1757 | MURDER State It is ordered by the Court that an vs | Instat er Capias be issued for a materia) Arthur Gilbert Jones | witness, Hal G. Bennett, in this case, BREAKING, ENTERING & L ARCENY “Nos. 2027 & 2028 7 aes rue . State vs ‘Dorman Lee Barker William Ashley Bustle (ex (No. 2008 | BREAKING, ENTERING & LANCENY State | A True Bill. vs tia. Clifford Lee Poorboy alias | re Clifford Lee Phillips init “No. 2014 | FORGERY State | A True Bill. vs j Hilda Henryetta Reid | ‘Mo. 2015 | FORGERY | “tate | A True Bill. vs ij Hilda Henryetta Reid | ‘ 1838 & 1839 { ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON & BREAKING, ENTERIN — | & LARCENY c D dant. ‘ Resane GhttGerd Sacieen | ontinued for the Defendan @ oun | hd ‘Nos. 1840 & 1841 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON & BREAKING, ENTER" 4 “—— | & LARCENY ; : : . ' James Gray Nonnines Continued for the Defendart, 14 road , "he aor? | LARCENY OF AUTO a A vs Continued for the State. » | \4 William Glenn Gilleland / iis cade | : ue Ht | oe 2012 & 2013 | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY ie | i oa e A true Bill. -_ se i | Vharles Current | un 1 ‘Joe Watt a ||| ‘Woodrow Chanbers | i]. No. 193 ne it a Seess , | ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Judenent That vs Defendant called and failed. € ‘ Wanda Jean Henderson | a a mild: No. 198 TW are ? | NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE _—" ts a | Defendant called and failed. Judes WN “anda Jean Nendergon Nisi Sci Fa and Capvias Instanter- IN THE SUBRIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 195), Monday, January 25th, 1854" Alo. 2007 State 8 clifford Lee Poorboy alias vlifford Lee Phillips ‘No. 2014 State vs Hitda Henryetta Reid No. 2015 State vs Hilda Henryetta Reid Wo, 2022 State vs Virgil Patterson Nos. 1920, 1921, 1922 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926 & 1927 State vs Roy Daniel Rum le, Jr. Mervin “onald Turne~ ‘Yarshal’ “lomry Fox Menneth Weslev Fox ‘No. 2012 State vs Joe Watt C652 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill FORGERY Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci a and Capias Instanter, FORGERY Defendant called and failed. Nisi Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. Judpment PREAKING, ENTERING & LARCLNY A True Bill. . ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, INT TO KILL: ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON: ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, INT fO KILL: ASSAULT WITH DEANLY WeAPON: ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, INT TO KILL: RESIST ARi-EST: ASSAULT ON FEMALE AND ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, INT TO KILL. Burke & burke are private prosecuting Attorneys for the State. Trivette, Holshouser & Mitchell, J. G, Lewie and McLaughlin & %attley are attorneys for the Defendants. In #1921, Defendant enters a plea of Not Gui lt Ve In #1923, Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. In # 1925 & #1926, Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. In Nos. 1920, 1922, 1924 & 1927, Defendants enter a plea of Not \uilty. Nos. 1920, 1922, 1924 & 1927 are consolidated for purpose of trial. ure sworn and empanelled as follows: He W right R, L, Little D. W. Riddle Thos. E. Grose Gilbert &. Brotherton N. D. Benfield C. E. Stikeleather Sam Wilson Wm. T. vomer, dr. M, L. Williams K. B. Lamberth C, E. Pharr At the close of the State's evidence, the defendants and each of them through their Counselor enter a plea of Guilty to the “harge of Assault With A Deadly Weapon. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to seceiving stolen property knowing same to have been stolen, which plea the State accepts. Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the State Prison for a period of not less than TWO (2) nor more than FOUR (4) YEARS, and assigned to work as provided by law. This prison sentence is suspended for a period of Five (5) Years on the condition he not violate any of the laws of this State, and pursue some gainful occupation, if able, and to pay his costs, (1/3 of the cost). FIRST WERK o==> JANUARY PERM 1954 a eee a eA Monday, January 25th, 1954, a ‘tude Tis "oi a Wea \ | ’ ’ Rid ye f A jmsat iH ; | ‘No. 2011 | —e ENTERING & LARCENY io. 2010 LARCENY i ORR alt State efendant enters a plea of G 7806 Raley | | 7 |, Qr.the coupe of Breaking’s Calltt ten Bat ee Lee Se Ey a Charles Current alias of the Vourt is that the defendant be donfion jack Robert Johnson W. H, Wright : ' .. Lae James Currence | in the State Prison for a period of not og ac D. W. Riddle oS oa | i Ca21 { THREE (3) nor more than FIVE (5) YEARS, ang Gilbert E. Brotherton N. D. Benfield ' | assigned to work as provided by law, C. E. Stikeleather Sam Wilson | mame & Gwe “Eke sae Judgment as fo, Wa I. Comer, Jr. M. L, Williams | & in No. a ; K. B. L : | concurrente/ten «uf. <.7 ; yl run amberth Coite Brady | aif ba ENTE RCE 1918 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON | No. 2013 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY ‘Mes. 1403 & 19 Continued until May Torm, 1954 State Defendant enters a plea of Guilty as charged = ° y : ; | On the count of breaking & <nteri as ; vs 1 g ering, Judgner : Woodrow vhambers of tne Court is that the defendant ce tadten Vlenent Gaither Ve in tue State Prison for a period of not less tix THREE (3) nor more than FIVE (5) YEARS, ind assigned to work as provided b» law, _ On the count of Larceny, same judgment as 2 Bie Breaking & “ntering in No. 2013 and to run bE ae C@ncurrent. ee ae ee $2 Sea al taiecas le ctascadantiga one op omega sAnN VO e £UUU tye State wait! 7 Harold Williams DRIVING DRUNK ue Solicitor recommends that the judgment hee of the Lower Court be affirmed and defendant y | taxed with the additional cost of Superior Court. \No. . 010 | LAacENY ' : “tat A true Bill. | : vack hob-rt Johnson | } “No. 2019 RECKLESS DRIVING _— Solicitor recommends that the judgment s of the Lower Court be affirmed and defendatt taxed with the additional cost of Superio Court. “enny T. Ranne ——_ ee By i | speeding a ahh e | Defendant through his onhornee, —. i Jack D enters a plea of Guilty to speeding Ba | ; — arnon With the consent of Counsel and the defendat! in open Court, the judgment . the Court ng 5 in th : ay Fredell County fos a period of SSFP tol" 13, : and assigned to work on the roads under a 1 control and supervision of the State Highway til and Public Works Commission. (2) Tests iba | This sentence is qongennee for +wo at ris ; t on the following conditions: That he nov ! any beverage containing alcohol; that he be tT late any of the laws of this state; > a i i a fine of 750-00 and the costs; that the Nib his driver's license into the of fice .. ; 4 | Clerk of Superior Court; and not or this H motor vehicle while upon the highways ©" |. Bite gy Days hd, State for a period of Ninety Days, the 4. phe euptresicn of ee the license t? a wr ver ° } him, s directed to de This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, January 26th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. ~N ‘ Stare HIT & RUN a A True Bill. Sebastian Cansino JUDGE PRESIDING IN THE SUPERIOR C FIRST WEEK --- JA UARY Tei, 1954 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT : Tuesday, Jmuary 26, 195) iy | FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 195, Tuesday, January 26th, 1954 EEE ERRR SSPE ‘Nos. 2007, 2008 & 2009 State vs vlifford Lee Poorboy alias oe Lee Phillips ' i : ‘No. 1995 DRIVING AFTER LICEN E bia Hy This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday no ba readint Wiis Wis atterner ee Never a UE | 230 o'clock A. M vs enters a plea of Guilty, a y; H Morning, January 26th, 1954, at 9:30 o clock A. M, Ernest Berry English Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant We32 be confined in the common jail of Iredell 4 7 ~ a periee of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, and li ssigned to work on the roads under the control - ae No. 2020 DRIVING DRUNK - 2ND OFFENSE and oS State On recommendation of the Solicito ca. the State Highway and Public | ¥ | Wey bee Yea?ol nd Getedaans samme with naeiettct en The Clerk is to transmit a copy of tais | rif Harry Lee Vanelt and defendant taxed with additional cost udgment to the M V | We h2 of Superior Court. aleigh, N. . — ee i ' It is ee to the Court by Counsel representing the defendant that the defendant iki No. 1878 POSSESSION FOR SALE is a disabled veteran, and the Court reouests § a State Defendant enters a plea of Guilty, that he be given a complete physical examina- th vs Judgment of the Court is that the tion before being assigned to do any kind of = i Gilmer Sherrill defendant be confined in the Common Jai] work, : | 48 We56 of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) | Ants : MONTHS, oe assigned to work on the roads under —_ the control and supervision of the State “No. 2092 DRIVING DRUNK= 2ND OFFENSE f wae eT Works a ae State Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. | ' s sentence is suspende or a period of vs this cause coming on for iud t i Four (4) Years on the following conditions: Ray Rufe Reid the defendant's seened oftaehs “demue or fe Feta That he not possess any beverage containing W-36 the Court is that the defendant be cofined in 1h alcohol; that he not violate any of the laws « the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period 0; this State; that he pay a fine of $100,00 of FOUR (4) MONTHS, and assigned to work on and the costs; that he make his personal the roads under the cmtrol and supervision appearance at the November Term of Cart, 19k of the State Highway and Public Works Commission and 1955 and satisfy the presiding Judge — and that he surrender hie driver's license to upon his ofm oath, or any other evidence that the Vlerk, and the Clerk is directed to send he may be able to adduce, that he has not these license to the Safety Division of the violated any of the foregoing conditions. Motor Vehicle Department so that they can be On failure of the defendant to carry out any o- revoked as provided by law. ‘ the conditions of this suspended — upon motion of the Solicitor, Capias an P ' commitment to issue to put the prison sentence nae 977 ] DRIVING DRUNK into execution. Late j On recommendation of the Solicitor, vs } Judgment of the Lower Vourt is affirmed and Bill Bumgardner | defendant is ordered to pay a fine of $100.00 sNos. 2007 & 2008 j BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY °27 {| end pay the cost of this action. It is ordered state j Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. , | that the defendant not operate a motor vehicle vs | In No. 2007, on the charge of Breaking ¢ | for a period of Twelve (12) Months. ‘lif ord Lee Poorboy alias | ‘ntering, Judgment of the Court is that ti vlifford - Phillips | defendant be confined to the a Hy ‘No. 2010 ieee wo 3 fo iod of not less than . more than SEVEN (7) YEARS, and assigned to “=o Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged work as provided by law. ae in the Bill of Indictment. In Noe 2008 on’ she charge of Breaking & “ack Robert Johnson Judgment of the Court is that the defendant | Entering, Judgment of the Court is that the “3 be confined in the State Prison for a period of } defendant be confined to the State Prison not less than SEVEN (7) nor more than TEN (10) for a period of not less than FOUR (4) ne YEARS, and assigned to work as provided by law. more than SEVEN (7) YEARS, and assigned 9 It being made to appear to the Curt that } work as provided by law. This sentence ¢ this defendant was indicted in some several I | 1 Glenn Campbell run concurrent with sentence in No. LARCENY s Defendant enters a plea of ~*~ 4 corn t0 Prayer for jude met continued fr term for a period of Twelve (12) Months. cases at the May Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, 1951, and sentence was imposed, suspended for Five (5) Years on condition that the defendant be of good behavior and not violate any law. The Court finding as a fact that the defendant since the fa@egoing judgment was pronounced has violated the law on the charge of larceny, the jury returning a verdict of ilty of larcen and it is now ordered | i ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON that a comnittaent Lseue to put the suspended ais) — Nol Pros With Leave. sentence into execution. This sentence to run 1 = concurrent with sentence in #2010. %». / J/ ‘No, 2 Rete DRIVING DRUNK v8 Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. “No. 2020 State mn vs | atl Harry Lee Van?elt Weh2 INo. 1878 State AL | vs if, Gilmer Sherrill Hf W-56 — By! ¢ «Nos. 2007 & 2008 uh od State + | vs 4 slif-ord Lee Poorboy alias i slifford Lee Phillips W=37 a ey - ee y a r -dilcadienminemned a — aaa ) > 7 ro i te ‘Nos. 2007, 2008 & 2009 State vs vlifford Lee Poorbo alias a Lee Phillips ‘No. 2021 . State bid, vs Glenn Campbell IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 195, Tuesday, January 26th, 1954 this Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, January 26th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. HK. DRIVING DRUNK - 2ND OFFENSE On recommendation of the Solicito Judgment of the Lower Court is affirmed and defendant taxed with additional cost of Superior Court. POSSESSION FOR SALE Defendant enters a plea of Guilty, Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jai] of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the roads under the control and supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended for a period of Four (4) Years on the following conditions: That he not possess any beverage containing alcohol; that he not violate any of the lans o! this State; that he pay a fine of $100.00 and the costs; that he make his personal appearance at the November Term of Caurt, 195, and 1955 and satisfy the presiding Judge upon his o¥m oath, or any other evidence thet he may be able to adduce, that he has not violated any of the foresoing conditions. On failure of the defendant to carry out any 0: the conditions of this suspended sentence, upon motion of the Solicitor, Capias and ‘ commitment to issue to put the prison sentence into execution, BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Suilty. In No. 2007, on the charge of Breaking & bntering, Judgment of the Court is that tn defendant be confined to the State Prison for a period of not less than FOUR (4) not more then SEVEN (7) YEARS, and assigned 0 work as provided by law. tet In No. 2008, mn the charge of Breaking @ Entering, Judgment of the Vourt ea ; defendant be confined to the State ale for a period of not less than FOUR oo more chen SEVEN (7) YEARS, and assigme . work as provided by law. This sentenc : run concurrent with sentence in No. y LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Ooh Ze tern +0 Prayer for judgment continued or ag term for a aaetae of Twelve (12) Mon ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Nol Pros With Leave. ‘No. 1995 State vs Ernest Berry English -3 “No. 2002 State vs Ray Rufe Reid W-~36 “No. 1977 State vs Bi} Bungardne r ‘No, 2010 State vs week Robert Johnson m3 ‘No, 2001 State vs Jimmie Kink IN THE SUPERIOR C FIRST WEEK -2- JANUARY Too 195) Tuesday, Jmuary 26, 195) URT DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley enters a plea of Guilty, ' Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS and assigned to work on the roads under the control and supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Comission. i he Clerk is to transmit a copy of tnis udgment to the M V siftcn, x0 _ otor Vehicle Department at It is suggested to the Court by Counsel representing the defendant that the defendant is a disabled veteran, and the Court reouests that he be given a complete physical examina- tion before being assigned to do any kind of work. ‘ DRIVING DRUNK= 2ND OFFENSE Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. this cause coming on for judemmt and being the defendant's second offense, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be cofined in the Vommon Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the roads under the cmtrol and supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission and that he surrender his driver's license to the Clerk, and the Clerk is directed to send these license to the Safety Division of the Motor Vehicle Department so that they can be revoked as provided by law. DRIVING DRUNK On recommendation of the Solicitor, Judgment of the Lower Vourt is affirmed and defendant is ordered to pay a fine of $100.00 and pay the cost of this action. It is ordered that the defendant not operate a motor vehicle for a period of Twelve (12) Months. LARCENY Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in the Bill of Indictment. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the State Prison for a period of not less than SEVEN (7) nor more than TEN (10) YEARS, and assigned to work as provided by law. It being made to appear to the Curt that this defendant was indicted in some several cases at the May Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, 1951, and sentence was imposed, suspended for Five (5) Years on condition that the defendant be of good behavior and not violate any law. The Court finding as a fact that the defendant since the fa@egoing judgment was pronounced has violated the law on the charge of larceny, the jury returning a verdict of guilty of aoe and it is now ordered that a committment issue to put the suspended sentence into execution. This sentence to run concurrent with sentence in #2010, %.% / yy, DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed. Sci Fa and Capias Instanter. Judgment Nisi ‘No. 1991 State vs Elijah Green b= 33 INo. 1990 State vs Elijah Green C= 33 4 No. 2027 State vs Yorman Lee Barker W ~ 1 g ‘No. 2028 State vs William Ashley Bustle } No. 1966 State vs Hubert Stimpson uo IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---= JANUARY "a 1954 4 Tuesday, January 26th, 19 HIT & RUN Defendant enters a plea of Guilty Judgment of the Court is that the def be confined in the Common Jail of J _ County for a period of EIGHT () mo assigned to work on the roads under tie and supervision of the State Hirhway _ Public Works Commission, oi f j-4) NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE Defendant enters a plea ofGuilty, Judgment of the Court is that the defen be confined in the Connon Jail of Iredell ” County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, ang eo * work on the roads under the control and supervi ¢ Hic and Public Work fame bie sentgnm? is to run concurrent with sentence in #1991, BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant through his attorney enters a plea of Guilty of Larceny of roods under tne value of $190.00 which plea the State will accept. Prayer for judgm nt continued for a period of TWO (2) YEARS on the following conditions: That he be of reneral good behavior; that he not v olate any of the laws of this State; ‘hat he make restitu- tion to Stamey Holland in tre amount of $17.25 and that he pay the costs of this action. BREAKING, TERING & LARCENY Vefendant through his attorney enters a plea of Guilty of Larceny of coods under the value of 3100.00 which plea the State will accept. Prayer for judgement continued fora period of TWO (2) YEARS on the following conditions: That he be of general good behavior; That he not violate any of the laws of this State; The he make restitu- tion to Stamey Holland in the amount of $17.25 and that he pay the costs of this action. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Ce H. Surratt K,. F. Holland Wade ii. Hoover CU. G. Mills Horace Howard F, J. Ostwalt W. C. Morgan Homer Troutman H. E. Massey H. C. Horne oe De. Poole Varce Goble Jury returned a verdict of Guilty 8 charge in the Bill of Indictment. Judemem On the charge of 4reaking & “ntering, © of the Court is that the defendant be con in the Common Jail of Iredell ,ounty of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned on the roads under the control and supe of the State Highway ard Public Works “On” he On the charge of Larceny, Judgment 4 in the Court is that fhe defendant be confine tod of Common Jail of Iredell County for & Pe TWO (2) YEARS, and assigned to work roads under the control and su State Highway and Public Works °° “ This sentence is suspended for 8 he not FOUR (4) YEARS on the condition tat violate any of the laws of this State. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 195, “No . 2003 State vs James Smit h Mo. 2006 State vs Lillie Smith “No, 2023 State v8 James Archie Small W-17 No. 2024 State vs Donald Wilson Sherrill W-18 No. 2025 State a immie Wey nerson Baker Tuesday, January 26, 1954, ASSAULT ON FEMALE A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill, BREAKING, ENTE: ING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Vourt is that the peg mer be confined in the Common Jail ° redell County for a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, to be Sesieoaa to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended and defendant is hereby placed on probation for a period of Three (3) Years under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its officers, subject to the nrovisions of the laws of this State and the rules and orders of said Commission, and its officers with leave that the execution might be prayed at any time during the period of probation. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of Twelve (12) Months, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended and defendant is hereby laced on probation for a period of Three (3) Years under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its officers, guazest to the provisions of the laws of this -tate and the rules am orders of said Commission, and its officers, vith leave that the execution might be prayed at any time during the period of Probation. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea ofGuilty. Judgment of the vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended and defendant is hereby or on probation for a period of Three (3 Years under the supervision of the North Varolina Probation Commission and its Officers, subject to the provisions of the laws of this State and the rules and Orders of said Commission, and its Officers, with leave that the execution might be geopee at any time during the period of robation. Mc S=> == a === FA, he LU We ' ‘ => ao ho 2 oll We /No. 2026 State a obby Lee Hege W216 No. 2022 State vs Virgil Patterson Vel9 ' No. 1962 “tate vs dal E Roseman ‘No. 1961 “tate vs lal Eugene Roseman W=53 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---=- JANUARY TERM, 195, Tuesday, Jawary 26th, 195, ee eee ee BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE (12) months, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended and defendant is hereby os = probation for a period of Three (3) Years under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its officers, subject to the provisions of the laws of this State and the rules and orders of said Commission and its officers, with leave that the execution might be prayed at any time during the period of Probation. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Yefendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the vourt is tliat the defendant be confined in the Common Jeil of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE (12) months, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public works \ omnission, This sentence is suspended and defendant is ie: placed on probation fora | Period o (3) Years under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its officers, subject to the provisions of the laws of this State and the rules and orders of said Commission and its officers, with leave that the execution might be rayed at any tise during the period of robation. hat as special condition of probation ordered by the Court, the defendant shall pay the costs of tits action on or before the May 17, 1954 E. FROM. PARKING METER SPACE With Leave. DRIVING DRUNK 4 Defendant through his attorneys, W. f Battley and J. G. Lewis, enters a plea 0 Not Guilty. : Jury sworn and empanelled ag follows: ve Me Surratt Homer Troutman H, C. Horne Vance Goble G P Lewis Wade M. Hoover Horace Howard W. C. Mo ve De Peake D. W. Middle C. G. Mills Gilbert E. Brot Jury retucred a verdict of Guilty 48 charged in the warrant. ant Jud ment of the Court is that the defen’ be confined in the Common Jail of THs ont County for a period of FOUR (4) M0 aa and assigned to work on the roads be Highway control and supervision of the Stat and Public works Commission. This sentence is suspended for Years on the following conditions: — t pay a fine of $199,990 and the costss ih not operate a motor vehicle upon +3) Years; of this State for a period of Tye ois That he surrender his driving aad Clerk and he is hereby dir ected these license to the Safety Div n e Motor Vehicle Department hey c@ (dontnued on page $85) herton No. 1961 State evs Hal Eugene “oseman No. 1999 State vs Zaphon (none) “ilson B18 “Te, |p NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY State vs Paul Church IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEX ---- JANUARY TERM, 195, Tuesday, January 26, 1954 DRIVING DRUNK (Continued from page 204) revoked as provided by law; that he not violate any of the laws of this state where the Justice of the Peace does not have exclusive original jurisdiction. It is stipulated upon his failure to carry out anyone of these conditions, 8 tH to issue on motion of the Solicitor in the discretion of the Court to put the prison sentence into execution. The foregoing judgment is pronounced with the consent of the defendant any his Counsel in open Court. (See page 208 DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Vounty for a period cf FOUR (4) Months, and assipmed to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Hirhway and Public works - ommission. This sentence is suspended unon the following cn ditions: That he not drink any beverage containing alcohol; ‘hat he pay a fine of $100.00 and pay the costs of this action; That he pay into the office of the Vlerk Guperior Court the sum of $50.00 for the use and benefit of E. M. Rollins; and that he not violate any laws of this State; That he surrender his driver's license to the Clerk and the Clerk is directed to send these license to the Safety Division of the Motor Vehicle Department so that they can be revoked as provided by law;and that the defendant not operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways for a period of Twelve (12) Months. It is ordered that $75.00 be paid now, $25.00 of wich is to be applied on the costs, and defendant is given until lst of May, 1954 to pay the balance. lbon the defendant's fallure to pay the balance of the cost and fine, capias and commitment to be issued by the clerk without further orders of the Vourt This cause coming on for trial at the January 25th Term, 1954, of the Suverior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J 5 ; ge J. A, Rousseau, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant, Paul Church, was convicted for non-support of il) egitimate Mild at the November 1953 Term of the Superior Court; and it further “Ppearing to the Court that as a result of a conference between Judge J. Will Pless, Judge presiding at the November Term of the Superior Court of Tredely County, Sally J, Jackson, cousel for defendant, w. R. Batley, r “Presenting private prosecution, it was ordered that Mattie Lee Boggs, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 1954 WEEK ---- JANU: Tuesday, January 26, 1954 a = ae oe Dennis Lee Boggs and Paul Church should all submit to a blood grouping Mo. 2005 Co) Saeed Weare | pn Defendant through her test, and that if the test showed that Vhureh could be the father of the vs ee burene irivette enters ns irs, Chloe Smith a plea of Not Guilty. child he was not to pursue his appeal, but the Court should ten pronounce att oa attorneys with the State. cicmaieneaawiiis snis tee ete, ean en we en ceigty Defendant withdraws plea of Not Guilty and enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. therewith; on the other hand, if the test showed that he could not be the father of the child, the verdict was to be set aside and Judge J, Will Kos. 1984 & 1985 FAIL TO SHOW DR LICENSE: DRIVING DRUNK . . Ad WU ULUN S tate Continued. ws Pless, was to recommend to the solicitor that the case be nol prossed and James Groce Harwell the defendant discharged; it further appearing to the vourt that the test was made and it was reported that each of the three persons had different ee = tpe blood and that Church could not be the father of the child; it a oe ee gg = : sees at further appear‘ng to the Court that Judge J. Will Pless set the verdict aside; it further appearing to the Court that counsel representing the private prosecution stated that he had been informed by doctors that sometimes different results were obtained upon a second examination, and the Jourt being of the opinion that a further blood grouping test should be made; and it further appearing to the Vourt that W. R. Batley, counsel for private prosecution, and Zeb V. Morris, Solicitor, agree that in the event the test shows that Church could not be the father of the child the case will be nol prossed; that if the test shows that Church could be the father of the child, the case will be calendared for trial at the May Ters of the Superior Court of Iredell County: It is, therefore, Ordered by the vourt, in the exercise of its jiscretion, that Paul vhureh, Mattie Lee »orgs and Dennis Lee Jorgs, appear at the Duke Hospital, Vurham, North Carolina, at 12 o'clock on the 17th day of February, 1954, and submit themselves to a blood grouping test. This the 26th day of January, 1954. J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding. JNos. 200,, 2@e5 & Gen , 2006 DESTROY PERSONAL PROPERTY: ~yare BEXBKYXNRAROKS ASSAULT (ITH DEADLY WEAPON James Smith Eugene Trivette and J. G. Lewis are P Max xxtthkore xem kehx prosecuting attorneys for the wera Mar 120 Lillie Smith Defendants through their attorney of Allen and W. R. Battley, enter a pleé Yefendants withdraw their plea eres Guilty and enter a plea of Nolo Contend This Honorable Court takes » recess until Wednesday Morning, January 27th, l Dhecess Ao UDGE PR DING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERY 1954, Wednesday, Januery 27, 1954 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, January 27th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. No . 2005 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON With the consent of Counsel and th —— defendant in open court, Prayer for Selena: Mrs. Chloe Smith is continued from term to term for a peri 7 of TWELVE (12) MONTHS. The defendant to : her costs to which the County is liable for and th officer's fees to be paid in full, ’ /No. 2006 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State With the consent of Counsel and the vs defendant in open Court. Prayer % judgment Lillie Smith is continued from term to term for a period W of TWELVE (12) MONTHS. The defendant to pay her costs to which the County is Liable for, and the officer's fees to be paid in full, ‘No. 2004 DESTROY PERSONAL PROPERTY State With the consent of Counsel and the vs defendant in open Court, Prayer for judgment James Smith is continued from term to term for a period We of TWELVE (12) MONTHS. The defendant to pay his costs to which the County is liable for, and the Officer's fees to be paid in full. “No. 2003 ASSAULT ON FEMALE State Defendant enters a ples of Nolo Uontendere. dente © It is ordered by the Court thax this oe ae case be dismissed. No. 1961 DRIVING DRUNK State The judgment heretofore entered on , vs Tuesday, January 26, 1954 is hereby amende Hal Eugene Roseman as follows: the That he not violate any of the laws _. State except that he is not to violate - City Ordinance So) Jang Produce from a meter space, Chapter 17, Section oS nis Chapter 22, Section 44. Violation e% Ordinance would be a violation of the conditions of this judgment. "2: 199% ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON _ Nol Pros with Leave. Sebastian Cansino W-28 be HIT & RUN - Defendant through his attorne vs C Cc lea of Nolo Sebastian Cansino na sine oF che Bourt is that — be confined in the common jail of I County for a period of on SATEEN (18) 9 and assigned to work on the roads Z control and supervision of the Sta ; and Public Works Commission. ~~ “ : ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT a , Continued until the May, David Bailey Superior Court. 1954, Term of IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Wednesday, January 27, 1954 Nos. 1996 & 1997 DRIVING DRUNK & RECKLESS DRIVING Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: v8 Hazekial Griffin H. E. Massey K, B, Lamberth Wilbert K. F. Holland kK, L, Little L He Hollar, Jr, Thos. E, Grose Cc. E. State Wright N. D. Benfield - Stikeleather Coite Brady ~Wm T. Comer, Jr. Wade hi, Hoover Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in the warrants. In No. 1997, Judgment of the C ourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a periad of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to ’ work on the roads under the control and supervision of the Rate Highway and Public Works Commission, It ss onburek that he surrender his driver's license to the Clerk and the Clerk is directed to send these license to the Safety Division d@ the Motor Yehtrle Department at Raleigh, N.C. to be revoked as provided by law. In #1996, Judgemet of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common Jail of Irede!l County for a period of SIXTY (6C) DAYS, and assigned to work on the roads under the control and supervision of the State Hiechway and Public Works Commission. his sentence to run conarrent with the sentence imposed in #1997. Mos. 2016, 2017 & 2018 POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LICUOR FOR SALE: tate POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: POSSESS " NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Harry Baxter Defendant throurh his attorney, w=L,0 Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn ami empanelled as fo!lows: Sam Wilson vl. G. Mills M. L. Williams Homer Troutman C. He Surratt H, C,. Horne Horace Howard Vance Goble W. C. Morgan GU, P, Lewis C. D. Poole D, W. siddle Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in each case. In #2016, two counts in the bill charging unlawful possession consolidated for purpose of judrment. oe of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Vommon jail of Iredell County for a period of Twelve (12) Months, and assigned to work on the roads under the control and supervision of the State Highway d Public Works Commission. ” In Bo. 2018, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) assimed to work on the roads under oe ccheres and Supervi sion of the State Highway a Public Works Commission. This sentence to euhe on tne oe of the sentence in 201 7 ( i ’ rs the foregoing cose tone of the Court is _ ‘ the defendant be confined in the common Jali 0 Iredell County for a period of FIGHTEEN ie) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the roads under the control and supervisi on ‘i. pt _——" Public Works Commission. s sentence is cceanee for a period of FOUR (4) YEARS on - condition that he mot possess any intoxicants o any kind, and that he not violate anv of the laws of this State. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK e--- JANUARY TERM, 1954 No. 1927 State vs Kenneth Wesley Fox Wel, , No. 1926 State vs Kenneth Wesley ‘ox We2h JNo. 1929 State 1 vs Roy Daniel Rumple, Jr, Ywi30 pie, No. 1921 State vs Marvin Vonald /urner W-18 ‘No. 1922 State vs Marvin Donald ‘urner 18 "No. 1923 State vs Marshall denr F ox We17 , "No. 1924 Itate vs Marshal) Henry Fox INos. 1925, 1926 & 1927 State vs Kenneth Wesley Fox Wednesday, January 27, 195) ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jai} Iredell County for a period of TWELVE (12), MONTHS, and assigned to wark on the road under the control and supervision of i State Highway and Public Works Commission, ASSAULT ON FEMALE Judgment of the Court ist be confined in the Comzon Jail oftredtyt County for a period of TWO (2) YEARS and as- signed to work on the roads. Thig 5 ntence is suspended for a period of Four (A) Years on the condition that he not violate any of the laws of this State. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Judgment of the Court is that the defendart be confined in the Vommon Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the roads under the control and supervision of the State “ighway and Public Works Commission. (Note: Vefendant may be sent to First Offender's a Busey ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, md Assigned to work on the roads underthe Control and supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Kote Defendant may be sent to “irst Offender's amp. ov - ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of Twelve (12) Months, and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. “his sentence is suspended for a period of Four (4) Years on the - condition he not violate any of the laws of t# State. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON dant Judgment of the Vourt ig that the defen be confined in the Common Sail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the roads under the control and supervision of tne State Highwy and Public Works Commission. (“ote: Deft. may be sent to “irs Camp.) p-9 t Offender's a WITH DEADLY WEAPON . udgment of the Court is tha ntl be confined in the Comeon Jail of Iredell for a period of Twelve (12) Months, a sen 0 to work on the roads under the ae shoe oO: the State Highway and Public Works od of This sentence is suspended for @ per he at Four (4) Years on the condition that violate any of the laws of this State. t the defendant SCI _ FA ON BON Sci Fa discharged on payment 0 of the Sci Fa. f the cost IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK e--- JANUARY TERM, 1954 No- 1846 State vs. tis Horace Howie We23 Nic. 1963 State v3 Glenn E., Miller W-22 Ao. 1998 State vs Glenn David Frye’ Weil Ao, 1947 State vs John Everette Garris WORTH CAROLINA IREDELL cv OUNTY ‘State #1376 State vs J. Samuel Brawley Wednesday, January 27, 1954 MANSLAUGHTER Defendant through his attorney, Hugh G, Mitchell, enters a plea >f Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: M. L. Williams Vance Goble Horace Howard G, P. Lewis W. C. Morgan Gilbert E. Brotherton C. De. Poole K. F. Holland Homer Troutman L. H. Hollar, Jr. H. C. Horne We. H. Wrirht Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. MANSLA\GHTER Defendant through his attorney, W. K, Battley, enters a plea of suilty of Seckliess Vriving, wnich plea the State accepts. Judement of the Yourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell vounty for a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, and assigned to work on the roads under the control and supervision of the State Hirhway and Public Works Vommission. This sentence is suspended upon payment of $50.00 rine and the costs of t.is action, DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Sam Wilson R, | Little Je He. Surratt Thos. ©. Grose Ce G. Mills N. D. Senfield D. W. Riddle voite Brady C. E. Stikeleather wade ™, Hoover AK. Be. Lamberth v, M, Arey Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. DRUNK Judgement of the Court is tmt the defendant fined in the vommon Jail of Iredell aeuiee for a period of THIRTY (30) DAYS, and assigned to work in and around the \ ounty Home or Farm. ‘his sentence to run comcurrent with the sentence he is now serving at the County Home. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM ORDER The Judgment heretofore entered in the above entitled case by his Honor 4 , ‘len A Gwyn, Judge Presiding, at the August 1950 “erm of Iredell Gunty Superior Court, as the same appears in Minute Docket 29, at pare 174, is hereby notified b; authorizing and directing the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell muy to P®y to J. Samuel Brawley the sum of $360.00 in reimbursement of the 8 MS paid in by him under said Judgment and no further payments are to be ma fe by the defendant; except as herein modified, the remaining provisions ee caowaaend Sedans z — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---=- JANUARY TERM, 195 ¥ Wednesday, January 27, 1954 upon which the prison sentence was suspended are to remain in full forge and effect, but the appearance of the defendant at the July Terms is waived, This 27th day of January, 1954. J. A. sousseau Judge Presiding wm MK Me ae Xe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TEAM /State Laer Stat: vs Ralph Edward Ferrell m) The sudpment heretofore entered in the above entitled case by his Honor Allen k. Gwyn, Judge Presiding, at the August 1950 Term of Iredell Jounty 049 Sure rior Court, as the same appears in Minute vocket 20, at page 175, is hereby monified by authorizing ana directing tie Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County to pay to ralph Edward Ferrell the sum of $615.00 in reimbursement of the sums paid in by him under said Judgment and no further payment s are to be made by the defendant; except as herein malified, the rema‘n ing previsions upon which the prison sentence was suspended are to remain in full force and effect, but the appearance of the defendant at the July Terms is weived, This 27th day of January 1954. J. A, Rousseau Judge Presiding “ % \No. 5456 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDSLI. COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 195% Mary S. Sloan j VS. | ORDER Henry Grady Sloan ] This cause coming on to be heard and being heard a t this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Hone, J. A, Rousseau, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the burt that an Q e Qn rder was made in tris cause at the Superior Court of Iredell County in which the Hon, ¢, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell C . ounty was anpointed receiver for the funds of Henry Grady Sloan, = Pay out certain sums to the plaintiff, Mary S. Sloan, and it further IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Wednesday, January 27, 1954 appearing to the Court that Henry Grady Sloan was represented in this action by B.S. Brown, Jr., and that Henry Grady Sloan has written C. G. Smith a letter authorizing him to pay out of the funds held by him and Attorney's fee in the sum of $60.00 for services rendered by 4. S. Brown, Jr., and it further appearinz to the Court that tnere are sufficient funds in the receivership to pay such fee without imparing the payments to be made to Mary S. Sloan. It is therefore order and adjudged by the Court that C. G. Smith, Clerk of tte Superior Court ofIredell County and receiver be ordered and he is hereby ordered to pay out of the funds of the receivership to BE. S. Brown, dr., tne sum of $60.00 for services rendered to Henry Grady Sloan. This cause is retained for further orders of the Court. This the 27 day of January, 1954. J. A. Rousseau XN h 7) I+ a’ GRAND JURY REPORT JANUARY TERM, 1954 The Grand Jury found true bills of indictrient on all cases presented by the Solicitor, Committees visited and inspected the following County Properties: County Jail At the jail we found the following prisoners: Sixteen wiite male, three colored female, eight colored males, mak ng a total of twenty-seven Prisoners, Ne found the building and equipment in excellent cond.tion with a health rating of Grade "A" and feel that the filer should be complimented on the *leanliness and efficient operation. County Home At the County Home we found the following inmates: Fourteen white female, seventeen white male, eight colored female, four colored male, making a total °f forty-three, Ne found two white male and two colored male -risoners. The management of *%e County Home is to be commended on the clean and orderly premises. re i ne — a on IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK +-- JANUARY TERM, 195, Wednesday, January 27, 1954 Prison Camp We found the Prison Camp to be in excella@mt condition, Court House We found that repairs referred to in Grand Jury Report of November, 1952, have not been made, noticeably; leaks in outer basement walls of py; office, Tax Listing office and Negro Farm Agents office. We recommend algo that rough concrete floors in the above offices be covered or treated in some manner to prevent excessive dust. We recommend that the sagging stairway from second floor to balcony on East side of building be examined by a competent builder and repaired as necessary. We recommend t.iat at least one new fluorescent light fixture be installed in Northeast corner of vault in Vlerk of Court's office to provide sufficient lirht for work in this area. We recommend covering with asbestos, steam pipes located under floor of Grand Jury Room to prevent excessive heat in the above named room, We note a flagrant laxity in janitorial service throughout the Court House, particularly in the ladies lounge. We recommend that steps be taken to correct this laxity. We find all other departments in good condition. ee No. 1915 DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED ie Continued until May Term, 1954. Robert Preston Weatherman _ 1931 EMBEZZLEMENT -” Continued until May Term, 1954. 8 L. &. Cashion, Jr. e L9 iNo. 1986 | ASSAULT ON FEMALE — Continued until May Term, 1954 Oscar James Lambert ‘No. 1994, SPEEDING State Continued until May Tern, 1956 vs William Darela Bunton : 1 This Honorable vourt takes a recess until Monde Morning, February ’ 1954, at 10:00 o'clock A. M, AN GE PRESIDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February 1, 1954 yorTH C AROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL SCUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1954 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Monday Morning, Febru ry 1, 1954 at 10:00 o'clock A. M., with Honorable J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding and holding Vourts of this Fifteenth Judicial Vistrict, spring Term, 1954, present and presiding. J, ©. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell bunty returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawfu) men and women trc_serve as ‘rors for this the second week of the anuary tern, 195,,, Predell Gounty Superior Court, to-wit: Clarence A. Moore Purvey Levan Lamar Gulledge J. S, Speaks Paul Sherrill Tr omas H. Hager J, C, MeLain W. E. Johnston Coite P Cashion James E, Brawley Hazel Atweil Charles B. williams James R, Lackey Russel] Ashburn Thomas Henderson 4, M, Gabriel L. Gordon Hayes Thad D. Setzer Henry Lewis Neel T. S, White agenellen White Holland v. weber J. W. Stinson .B. Stikeleather Max B, Tharpe T, B. Johnson ° Oliphant Toy L. Hutchens Mrs. Dorothy Troutman H. Rummage John F, Grare Miss Mayme Reavis Carlisle Mrs. Ethel Levan John M. Wilhelm - Hicks ‘obert W. Bell anpeared for Jury duty as ordered by the Court. \, M, Gabriel was deceased, Paul Sherrill lives out of the State. u "azel Atwell was excused by the Clerk. ) nse Mayme Reavis, John M,. Wilhelm and J. S. Hicks were excused by Dr's ‘ertificates Co ’ ite P, Cashion was excused by the Court. th omas Henderson was not returned. The following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed the “Worce Jury #1" to-wit: “larence A. Moore, J. S. Speaks, J. ©, McLain, Jam es R, Lackey, Henry L. Neel, Holland C. Weber, Toy L. Hutchins, John F “+ Grant, Mrs. Ethel Levan, Purvey Levanand W. E. Johnson, No, 621 DIVORCE Be J 1" being du worn an wy m Nantz Caudill ompann tid EeSwers’ cla issue subha Ped to # E ; as follows: Verett Cyril Caudill IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February lst, 1954 <No. 5621 In the Superior Court, February Term, 1954 North Carolina, Iredell County. Betty Jean Nantz Caudill } “ i ISSUES byverett Cyril Caudill ! 1. Vid the plaintiff and defendant marry each other and are they nor husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes ° 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more tiian two years prior to the institution of this action, ss alleged in tie complaint? Answer: Yes . 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes . North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. February Term, 1954 Betty Jean Nantz Caudill i vs. I JUDGMENT sverett Cyril Caudill ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues Submitted to it by the Jourt in favor of the plaintiff and »gainst the defendant, as set out in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Betty Jean Nants Caudill, and the defendant, Everette Cyril Caudill, be, and the same are hertl” ” and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. A, Rousseau Judge Presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Monday, February 1, 1954 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. j ibis We: sm: Betty Jean Nantz Caudill v8. ORDER FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILD Everett Cyril Caudill This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding at the February Term, 1954, Superior C ourt for Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact: 1, That one minor child, namely, David Everett Caudill, was born to the marriage union between the plaintiff and defendant, said child having been bom on the 24th day of December, 1949. 2. That the said minor child is now living with his mother, the plaintiff, and has lived with and been supported by his mother, the plaintiff, and has lived with and been supported by his mother, the pleintiff, since the defendant and plaintiff separated on the 15th day of July, 1951, except for @ small amount which has been contibuted by the defendant. 3. And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff fis a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor child, and that the best interest of said child would be served by being in the custody of his mother. 4. And it further appearing to the Jourt that the defendant should be required to contribute to the maintenance and support of said minor child. IT Is THERSFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. that the phintiff be, amdShe is hereby granted full and complete Wstody and control of David Everett Caudill, the aforesaid minor child. 2. That the defendant pay for the benefit, maintenance and support of the aforesaid minor ch'ld, the sum of Thirty Dollars ($30.00) per month, the saiq Payients to commence on the lst day of February, 1954, and said PeyMents sha) then be made at the rate of Thirty Dollars ($30.00) per month, “Svable on the 1st day of each and every month thereafter until further Order of + 0 vourt; that the said monthly payments shall be paid to the Heintiff for ¢}, : the benefit, maintenance and support of the aforesaid minor child. 3. This Cause is retained for further orders. Tt further appears to the Court that the above entitled action was Son 4 nt hy the plaintirr for an absolute divorce from the deferdant or ‘|. ground of two y inor ears separation and for the custody of the aforesaid m Mild + 4nd for maintenance and support for said child, am that a Judgment ine aga a ~~ a a (eine en es Ea ‘acme IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 1, 1954 granting the plaintiff an absolute divorce from the defendant has already been entered at this Term o* Iredell County Superior Court, This the lst day of February, 1954. J. A. Rousseau JUDGE PRESTDING DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being dulv sworn Jatherine Holmes Smith and empanelled answers the issues submitted vs to it as follows: Fran Smith “No. 5626 North Carolina, Iredell Sounty . In the Superior Court, February Term, 1954. Satnerine Holmes Smith - i ISSUES frank Smith | 1. Jid the plaintiff and defendant :erry eact other and are they now husbani and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separate and apart from each other fo more than two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes ey ; . ; > N 3+ Has the plaintiff been a bonifie resident of the State of North ‘arolina for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer; Yes North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell Count v, February Tern, 1954 satherine Holmes Smith vs. j JUDGMENT Frank Smith { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Irede}l we County, North Carolina, before His Honc?, sousseau, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaint.ff and against tie defendant, as eet ot in the rreegrd: wae 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February 1, 1954 It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds f matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff Catherine Holmes 0 . Smith, and the defendant, Frank Smith, be, and the same are hereby ’ jissolved, and the plaintiff is pranted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding. Ao, 5639 } DIVORCE . | — | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and John Fox | empanelled answers tne issues submitted to vs it as follows: Mary Fox NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY a n - @ DTT “* VID” IN THE DPERIO sua John Fox, Plaintiff -VS- Mary Fox, Defendant . ; ‘is - ail ) a a1 27. ; th 320 i ? 1. Were the Plaintiff and Defendant married, as aliered in the vomplaint? Answer Yes 2, Have the Pl intiff and Defendant lived seperate and apart from each e : + nf eh 4 anrted ? Other for two years next precedi ne th2> commencement i nis action: Answer Yes j . a : + . r No , a lina 3. Has the Plaintiff been a resident of rth varo f é : : mmoncerne ni acti ? ‘or six months imrediately preced ne the comme: nt of this action Answer: Yes Wart Ui R ILINA { i ij ) rb IOR COURT IREDELL Anvaeen 1954 TERM sul VUNAIT John Fox, Plaintiff Mary F Ox, Defendant This Cause coming on to be heard before the undersiened Judge ho cing é regular term of Iredell Superior Vourt and a jury, and the jury having “Meered the issue submitted to them in favor of the Plaintiff and aprinst sae SE AT ~— —" BeBe ER on SATS - oe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February 1, 1954 the Defendant, as appears in the record; IT IS, THEREFORE, Ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of s marriage heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside, and the Plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from t .e Defendant. It is further ordered that the Plaintiff pay the costs f this action, J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding ‘No. 5658 Camie Ann Jcnaldson DIVORC The Divorce Jury #1" being dulv sworn vs. and empanelied ansvers the issues submitted to as follows: John Oscar Donaldson IN THE SUPERIOR COURT » Ann Jonaldson VS. | ISSUES John Oscar Donaldson { 1, Hastie plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the plaintiff and defendant senarated, and have they lived > * . - . ; n separate ani apart cont’ nuously for two years next preceding ‘he institutio of this action? Answer: Yes North Caroline In the Superior Gourt Iredell County vamie Ann Donaldson vs. i JUDGMENT John Oscar Donaldson j The cause coming on to be heard before Honorable J. A. Rousseéus Judge Presiding cover the February Civil Term 195, Iredell G@ounty Superso? vourt, and being heard before said Honorable J. A. Rousseau, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted to the Jury: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February lst, 1954 1, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Varolina for more than six months next prececine the institution of this action? 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next precedins the institution of this action? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes", It is, therefore, by the sourt ordered, adjudged and decreed tet the bonds of matrimony heretofore existinr between the rlaintiff and the defendant be foreve- dissolved, and that the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, John Oscar Donaldson, and that the cost of this act’ on be taxed against the plaintiff b: Jd. A. Kousseau Judze Presiding * OK OK “No. 5666 | DIVQRCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn Mary Dalton McHenry and emnanelled answers the issues subritted —- to it as follows: Norris J, McHenry IND M1 AMAT Teta ; So nl , Ui NORTH CAROL! 1A i i Wwavil VU URT DELL COUNTY ¥ary Dalton McHenry, Plaintiff Vs, horrig J. McHenry, Vefendant 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and ws : ' — and and wife, as allered in the Complaint? Answer: Yes ——— 4. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apa . "art from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other . Or m i 4 : “ore than two vears continuously prior to the institution of this action? “a . Newer: Yes. —= --_——— 3+ Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North aro); ss a *na for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes, es a ma ‘ tt > aoe fon Ea. —= << i 4 —— ee a ' a) ia ] i, an) Oe l oe ee rs ~~ at SS ee “—y + a See Sse IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February 1, 1954 the Defendant, as appears in the record; IT IS, THEREFORE, Ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of ~s marriagse heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant be, ang the same are hereby dissolved and set aside, and the Plaintiff is eranted an absolute divorce from t e Defendant. It is further ordered that the Plaintiff pay the costs f this action, J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding “No. 5658 Camie Ann )cnaldson DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being dulv sworn vs. and empanelied ansvers the issues submitted to as follows: John Oscar Donaldson NORTH CAROLINA |} THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDH L COUNTY Camie Ann Donaldson VS. | ISSUES John Oscar Donaldson | 1, Hastie plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes é. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3+ Were *he plaintiff and defendant sevarated, and have they lived e ‘ , a j on separate ani apart cont’ nuously for two years next preceding ‘he institut of this action? Answer: Yes North Carolina in the Superior — Iredell County vamie Ann Donaldson V8- i JUDGMENT John Oscar Donaldson | The cause coming on to be heard before Honorable J. A. Rousseau, Y ‘ 7 ‘ : r vudge Presiding over the February Civil Term 1954 Iredell Gounty Superio vourt, and being heard before said Honorable J. A, Rousseau, and 4 Jurys the following issues were Submitted to the Jury: “No. 5666 | DIVORCE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February lst, 1954 1, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next prececire the institution of this action? 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes", It is, therefore, by the vourt ordered, adjudged and decreed tet the a bonds of matrimony heretofore existinr between the rlaintiff and the defendant be foreve- dissolved, and that the plaintiff is hereby granted a 1 divorce a vinculo from the defendant, John Oscz naldson, and that the cost of this act’ on be taxed aprainst the plaintiff b: J. A. Rousseau Judze Presiding * me OX 1e Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn Wary Dalton McHenry | and emnanelled answers the issues subriitted ey to it as follows: “orris J, MeMenry NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ry Dalton McHenry, Plaintiff Vs, Morris J, McHenry, Vefendant 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husb and wi & — and and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 4. Did the plaintirr and defendant separate and live separate and apa . Tt from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more 2 ‘ 2 wore than two vears continuously prior to the institution of this action? “newer: Yes. _-— -_——-— 3+ Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North “Molina f ‘i “na for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February 1, 1954 Manday, February 1, 1954 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT the Superior Court of Iredell Younty, North Carolina, and the Jury having IREDELL >OUNTY answered the Issue submitted to tem as follows: Mary Valton MeHenry What amount is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the Defendant? Vs | JUDGMENT Se ANSWER: "$4,639.72, with interest from February 8, 1952." Norris J. McHenry NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the Plaintiff This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of have and recover of the Defendant the sum of Four Thousand Six Hundred Thirty_ the Sunerior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor Nine Dollars and Seventy-Three Cents ($4,639.73), with interest thereon from J, A, Rousseau, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered February 8, 1952 until paid, together with the cost of this action, to be the issues submitted to it by the Couwt in favor of the plaintiff and taxed by the Vlerk, akainst the defendant, as set out in the records. Yigned and entered in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior burt of It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds Iredell County at Statesville, North Carolina on rebruary 1, 1954. of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Mary Dalton th Aine Sede Soapepresteme — i c t Norrie J. McH > i the sa icHenry, and tne defendant, Norris J. McHenry, be ond the same are : } : e Punn the plaintiff is granted ar absolute divorce from the No, 5587 J. A. Rousseau North Carolina . In the Suxerior Court Judge Presiding Iredell unt y February 1, 1954 Jivil Term Melvin C, Lackey Jury sworn and empanelled as ‘ollows: vlarence 4, loore, J S Speaks, J C McLain, Vs. Jas. C. Brawley, Jas. Kk. Lackey, Max B Tharpe, : Holland © weber, Toy L Hutchins, John F, veorge M. Benfield Grant, Mrs Ethel Levan, Purvey Levan and W E Johnson. 2 : t en EDF SS <= —22324 Se - Jury sworn and empanelled Reaieeisoster omen om 6H - ISSUES ern bislicttentibinadia es : si : aie 1, What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of “re ve &. vashion, trading and doing rcineee ne St oe ’ 1) ee se : olin t Siness as otar }illin 7 vompany, lefendant? Plaintiff - a ek SS Qs MBs . i Vs. Answer: 365 fon) — s Sy 2. What amount, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover on his Counter claim? aim: Vefendant,. a) —_ f , P ——— “nswer: $50.00 4 H LP ie | wi . De t? Whet amount is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the Defendan NSWER: 4639.73, interest Feb &th 195z. mH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT oot TREDELL counry = Me} ’ NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT “vin 0, Lackey, ; Plaintiff IREDELL COUNTY, FEBRUARY TERM, 1954 Vs, JUDGMENT *“orpe M, Benfield | ’ Defendant. i Mr. J. R, vashion, trading and doing yusiness as Star Milling Vompany, Plaintiff, This cauge comine on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, | : “ousseau, “UEP op ' Floyd “dans, Judge “residing, and a jury at the February Term of the Defendant. a I I Vs. j I I Court of Iredell County, and the jury having answered thc issues 0 $i : This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Hones initteg to ‘ “lem as follows: , 0 J. A, Housseau, Judge Presiding, and a Jury at the February Term, 1954 ie eS a Se ail Sie densi: a Rt Ke em ee nn eae 4 : bia’ ad | a Wt t ‘ iad ; eh +t Nia Hie: i ahh ct , ay tt : DD it ‘mle wey; i ’ if nt { as, by ae. ; ae iy a) ait Aid ah) | he, ‘ane wm ‘ul t hia) ; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, Monday, February 1, 1954 1954 1. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant on account of his complaint. herein? ANSWER _"$65.00" 2, What amount, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover of the plaintiff by reason of his counterclaim herein? ANSWER__"350.CO"_ NW, THERLFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiffs have ani recover of the defendant tre sum of Fifteen Dol’ars ($15.00), vogether with the costs of this action to be taxed bv the Clerk, “nis lst dav of February, 1954. J. A, Rousseau Judge lresiding ae North Carolina In the Superior C ourt Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Russell Ashburn, L. Gordon Hayes, J. W. Stinson, 7. 8. Johnson, Mirs. ——s Troutman, Lamar Gulledge, Thos. H. Hager, Charles B. Williams, Thad D, Setzer, Agenellen White, J. B. Stikeleather and W. A. Oliphant. Iredell County L. Kk. vashion, dr, ISSUE What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover for personal injuries caused by the negligence of the defendant? Answer 210,000.90 North Carolina, Iredell] county. In the Superior Court, January Term, 1954 L. R. Cashion, Jr. vs. | JUDGMENT voy Lee Hales 4 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, he Superior tted to J. Rousseau, Judge Presiding and a jury at the January Term of t -ourt of Iredell ¢ —— . i redell County, and the jury having answered the issue subm tiem as follows: \! e qu ies iat amount is the plaintiff entitled torecover for personal inJuF Cwsed by the neglirence 5f the defendant? Answer: "310,C00.00", t tie plaintl £ Now, therefore, h interes! it 1s ordered, adjudged, and decreed tha have and recover of the ieferiant the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars wit IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February 1, 1954 thereon from the lst day cf February, 1954, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk, This the lst day of February, 1954. J. Me Rousseau Juige Presiding lo. 56}3 North Carolina | In the Sunerior Court, Iredell County | January Term, 1954. Jonn R, Scott, Plaintiff, ” DECREE Statesville Plywood and Vencer Company, Inc., Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Judge Jd. A. Rousseau, at.the January, 1954 Term of Iredell Superior Court, upon the Vemurrer filed by the defendant in this cause, the Court, after hearing the Complaint, Demurrer and argument of counsel, is of the opinion that the Demurrer filed in this cause should be susta‘ned. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that this Demurrer be, and the same is hereby sustained and the cause of action is dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff. This the lst day of February, 1954. J. A, Rousseau Judge Presiding To the ruling of the Court plaintiff excepts, which is Plaintiff's “xception No. One. To the signing of the foregoing Judgment tne plaintiff Rein excents, which is Plaintiff's Exception No. Two, and notice of eppeal to e a 7 a . ° . ee the Supreme Court of North Carolina was civen in open Court. Further Notice Waived, Appeal bond set at $50.00. It is agreed that Summons, Complaint, D : “urrer and this Judgment sha)l constitute the case on appeal. Plaintiff ‘S given twenty Defendant given ten days days to serve case on appeal. L *reafter to ser ve counter-case or exceptions. Thig the lst day of February, 1954. J. A, Rousseau Presiding Judge. RRC A Ge ? ee Phi IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, . Monday, February 1, 1954 195% 1. What amount, if any, is tne plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant on account of his complaint herein? ANSWER _"$65.00" _ 2, What amount, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover of the plaintiff bv reason of his counterclaim herein? ANSWER__"350.CO"__ NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant tre sum of Fifteen Dollars ($15.00), sogether with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This lst dav of February, 1954. J. A, Rousseau Judge Tresiding a Ox Ne. 5579 North Carolina In the Superior C ourt Jury sworn and emparnelled as follows: Russell Ashburn, L. Gordon Hayes, J. We Stinson, 7. 3. Johnson, Mrs. Doroth Troutman, Lamar Gulledge, Thos. H. Hager, vs. Charles B. Williams, Thad D, Setzer, Agenellen White, J. B. Stikeleather and W. A. Oliphant. Iredell County 1. k. vashnion, dr, ISSUE What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover for personal injuries caused by the negligence of the defendant? Answer $10 ,C00.90 In the Superior Court, January Term, 1954 North varclina, Iredell County. L. R. Vashion, Jr, | vs. ' JUDGMENT voy Lee Hales ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, r JA Rousseau, Judge Presiding and a jury at the January Term of the Superio vourt of I 11¢ i a , tad ted to of 4redell County, and the jury having answered the issue submit taem as follows: What : : juries at amount is the plaintiff entitled torecover for personal inJ cwsed by the neglirence 5f the defendant? Answer: "310,000.00", plaintiff Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that t!# interes! have and recover of the defendant the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars wi? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Monday, February 1, 1954 thereon from the 1st day ef February, 1954, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk, This the lst day of February, 1954. J. A, Rousseau Juige Presiding fio, 56}3 North Carolina | Iredell County } January Term, 1954. In the Superior Court, Jonn R, Scott, Plaintiff, ” DECREE Statesville Plywood and Veneer Company, Inc., Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Judge Jd. A. Rousseau, at.the January, 1954 Term of Iredell Superior Court, upon the Demurrer filed by the defendant in this cause, the Court, after hearing the Complaint, Demurrer and argument of counsel, is of the opinion that the Demurrer filed in this cause should te susta‘ned. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that this Demurrer be, and the same is hereby sustained and the cause of action is dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff. This the lst day of February, 1954. . f A, Rousseau Judge Presiding To the ruling of the Court plaintiff excepts, which is Plaintiff's Exception No. One. To the signing of the foregoing Judgment the plaintiff sein excepts, which is Plaintiff's Exception No. Two, and notice of eppeal ‘oO the Supreme Court of North Carolina was civen in open Court. Further Appeal bond set at $50.00. It is agreed that Summons, Complaint, Yemurrer and this Judgment shal constitute the case on appeal. Plaintiff i ; ’ 8 given twenty days to serve case on appeal. Defendant civen ten days — to serve counter-case or exceptions. his the lst day of February, 1954. 5. A. Roweneen Presiding Judge. i {{ it ow ee gs Sea. i nme = ‘Nos. 2014 & 2015 FORGERY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WlEK --- JANUARY TERM, 195, Monday, February 1, 1954 No. 5452 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR count COUNTY Je Pe ernie _— aintifi, -vVS- J Billy Putnam. and Joe ShaLyPutnan, aud Defendants TiIS CAUSE Coming on to he heard, and being heard, before the unders ened Judge Presiding at the February, 1954, Civil Term of Superior Court of Iredell} Sounty upon the motion of Traders % Mechanics snsurance Company through its Attorneys, Carpenter & webb, for an order making said Gompany a party plaintiff and allowing it to file a Complaint setting out its interests in this cause, and the Jourt heine of the opinion that the interests of said Insurance Company can be adequately protected in any final Judgment entered in this cause in favor of the plaintiff; IT IS, THEREYORE, ORDFRED, in the discretion of the Court, that the Mechanics Insurance Company to intervene and be made a party plaintiff in this cause be and the same is hereby overruled; Tp TO PiIRTupT r ren . < it i URTI OPNERED that before any final Judgment in this cause ai.owing recovery to the plaintiff for damage to his property is entered that the interests o* the said Insurance Company be ascertained and its rignts protected therein, This the ar of F ‘ ; is the lst da- of february, 1954. J. A. Rousseau JUDGE PRESIDING. wm State on of the Court vs Hilda Henryetta Reid The Solicitor with permissi takes a Nol Pros With Leave. mL, 4 u ry ? Lnis -~ a a ’ onorable C-urt takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Febru 1954, at 9:20 O'clock A, M / d k g IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Tuesday, February 2nd, 1954 This Honorable vourt convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Yorning, February 2nd, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A, M, No. 562k DIVORCE 4 ret Austin Stockwell ~— Plaintiff -VS=- Fred Taft Stockwell Defendant. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF IREDELL Margaret Austin Stockwell Plaintiff -VS- Fred Taft Stockwell Defendart. l. wWere the plaintiff and defendant married to each ovher, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: _ Yes 2, Has the plaintiff been a bana fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years immediately preceding the bringing of this action as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THF SUPERIOR COURT. COUNTY OF IREDELL. Margaret Austin Stockwell Plaintiff -VS- Fred Taft Stockwell Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, and a Jury, at the Februcery Term, 1954, f ere submitted to and Jy dge J, A, Rousseau, Presiding, I "edell County Superior Court, the following issues w found by the Jurv: — bid Mc tt a Ne ‘an. ~— oe | fe } a ah oR —_—_— 7 Pea I Mel PO ia ome _ ae Se ae rl IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Tuesday, February 2, 1954 1, Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes". 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: "Yes", 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action, and the filing of this Complaint, as allezed in the Complaint? Answer: "Yes", IT IS, THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for the plaintiff, ORDERED, CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, that the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved; and that the plaintiff is hereby granted an A3SOLUTE JIVORCE,. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff pay the costs ¢ this action, to be taxed by the Clerk, J. A, Rousseau Presiding Judge. Statesville, N.C. Feb. lst, 1954. Ke me Ke KK Kk mK HK he HK No. 5699 DIVORCE Allene Hubbard vs Rayford Hubbard JOUNTY OF IREDELL Allene Hubbard -vs- Rayford Hubbard d in 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other as al lege the Complaint? Answer: Yes bh 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of Nort : ? Varolina for six months immediately preceding the bringing of this — Anwer: Yeg LL 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate ami apart wn'g each other for two years immediatdy preceding tk bringing of this action? Answer: _ Yes ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --=- JANUARY TERM, 1954 Tuesday, February 2, 1954 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT cOUNTY OF IREDELL Allene Hubbard -VS- teyford Hubbard THIS Cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, Judge J. A. X ousseau, Presiding, and a Jury, at the February Term, 1954, of Iredell County Superior Court, the following issues were submitted to and ’ found by the Jury: 1, Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: "Yes". 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the brinzing of this action, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: "Yes", 3. Save the plaintiff ani defendant l‘ved separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action, and the filing this Vomplaint, as alleged in tie Complaint? Answer: "Yes", IT IS, THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for the plaintiff, ORDERED, CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, that the bonds of natrimony now existing between plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved, anithat the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce, IT IS FURTHER ORDE ED, that the plaintiff have the care, custody, and control of the three minor children born of said marriage, and now in "er custody, as alleged in the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff pay the costs of t!is action, ‘Oo be taxed by the Clerk. J. A. Rousseau “Presiding Judge. Statesville WN. c Feb. st, 1954. ; : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK =--- JANUARY TERI, 1954 SECOND WEEK----JANUARY TERM, 195, stale ad ietiaeat His Nani Tuesday, Februry 2, 1954 /NO,. 5340 taxis jt rete, Metorney for Fred Sharon Satfford NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cour? Fred Sharon Stafford IREDELL JOUNTY red Sharon Stafford Be O. Shoemaker Plaintiff wow OK OK KK ok eK vs Mack R. Walker, trading amd doing business as Veterans Vab Company, ‘No. 5372 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: and Uleude B. Sprinkle, and Fred Jas. E. Brawley, Clarence A. Moore Sharon Stafford J. R, Cashion, T/A Star Henry L. Nell, Max B. Tharpe Hollmd C, Defendants Milling Co. Weber, J. S. Speaks, Toy L. hutchins, W. E. Johnson, J. W, Stinson, Mrs. chis cause coming on to be heard before liis Honor Judge Jd. A. Roussea Vs Dorothy Troutman , J. H. Rummage and John F, Grant, appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendants have agreed A, A, Setzer have compromised and settled all matters in comtroversy existing that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of “ousand & 00/100 (#3,000,00) Vollars and the costs of this action 4o, 5492 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: (“y agreement of parties this case is to be ‘ull settlement of his claim ara'nst the defendants and that the defendants, KM, G, Givens heard by Ten jurors) Russell Ashburn, L. Gordon Hayes, T. B. in consideration cf the above compromise and settlement have agre d each vs. Johnson, Lamar bulledge, Thos. H. er , . Thad D. Setzer, Agenellen White, J. B,. ith the other to waive, release, and remise any and all claims that they Yonald Goforth Stikeleather, W. A, Oliphant and Mrs. Ethel Levan, ~ now have or may hereinafter have wainst each other growing out of the said accident and collision which was the subject matter of this cause of action, It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of $3,000.00, together with the costs of this action in full settlement and that the defendants and each of them waive, release and remise any and all claims that they may have or may here inafter have arainst each other growing out of the automobile collision which was the subject matter of tiis action. This the 2nd day of February, 195k. J. A, Rousseau Jr Kr Rousseau, Judge Presiding, Fifteenth Judicial District By consent: Baxter H, Finch Attorneys for Plaintiff “, A, Hedrick Attorneys for Plaintitt &. O, Shoemaker Plaintt a, @s Ue Shoema ker Land, Sowe~s, Avery * Ward Attorneys for Defendants Mack Walker This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday —— Mack Walker, trading as Veterans Cab February ird, 195), Defendant » &t 9:30 o'clock A. M. hk 4EeR Viaude B, Sprinkle, Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -=== JANUARY TERM, 1954 Wednesday, February 3, 1954 This Honorable Court cavenes ,ccording to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, February 3, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, . No > 5498 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY M. G. Givens, Plaintiff, vs. JUDGMENT Donald Goforth, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding, at the February Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel that the parties hereto have compromised, adjusted and settled matters and things between them in this cause; NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the plaintiff recover nothing by this action, and that the defendant be and he is hereby forever discharged of any and all further liability to the plaintiff by reason of the matters and things alleged in the complaint; chat the plaintiff be and he is forever dischargedd@ any and all further liability to the defendant by reason of the matters and things alleged in the defendant's counterclaim, except that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. this 3rd day of February, 1954. J. A, Rousseau Judge Presiding CONSENTED AND AGREED TO: Fred G. Chamblee ttorney for Plaint Hugh G, Mitchel] ttorney for defendant : moe ke me me me ome me om IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 195, Wednesday, February 3, 1954 MNO» 5372 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY 1, 1954 CIVIL TEM J, R. Cashion, T/A Star Company anes or Plaiatsfe, A, A, Setzer, Defendant. 1 i -vs- ' ' ! 1, Vid the plaintiff and the defendant enter into a contract as alledge by the defendant? ANSWER: _Yes 2, If so, what amount of damages is the defendant entitled to recover? ANSWER: $200 plus interest of 6% per annum until date paid, plus cancellation of demands in this case by the plaintiff, 3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: None Alo. 5538 NORTH C AROLINA TREDELLE COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FEBRUARY 1, 1954 CIVIL TERM *alph Brown, Jury sworn and empane}led as follows: Russell Ashburn, L Gordon Hayes, T 3 Johnson, Plaintiff Lamar Gulledge, Thos H. Hager, thad D Setzer, Agenellen White, J. B. Stineleatner, WA " Oliphant, Mrs Ethel Levan, Vharles Willians, L and Jas. R. Lackey. teriy, BA Karnagort riy Kannapolis Defendants 1, Was the plaintiff's property damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes " 2. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entptled to recover? ANSWER: $250.00 3. Was the defendant's property damaged by the negligence of the Plaintitr, as alleged in the answer? AN SWER: ‘What damages, if my, is the defendant entitled to recover? ANSWER : a a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 195) Wednesday, February 3, 1954 NORTH C AROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY=FEBRUARY TERM No. 5538 Ralph Brown, Plaintiff, -VS- LL Ve “TK Ka & Ls Be | | I Byerly T/A Kannapolis Bakery | & Garlin UV, Mencer, I Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding, at the January-February Civil Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them, as appear of record; the issues having veen answered in favor of the plaintiff; IT IS, T.EREFORE, ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty 250.00) Dollars, and the costs of the action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 3rd day of February, 1954. J. A, Rousseau —JUDCE PRESIDING. — Upon the coming in of the verdict defendant moves to set aside the verdict as being contrary to thegfreater weight of the evidence. Motion overruled. Defendant excepts ani in open court gives notice of appeal to the Supreme Court for a new trial for errors assigned during the progress of the case and to be assigned. Further notice waived. To the signing of judgment and to the judgment as signed defendant excents. Defendant is allowed days within which to make up and serve case on appeal and the plaintiff is allowed days thereafter to serve counter case or file exceptions. Appeal bond in the sum of $100.00 adjudge sufficient. J, A, Rousseau eK eK we eK om IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 195, Wednesday, February 3, 1954, No. 5566 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE BUPERIOR COURT JANUARY-FEBRUARY TERM McDaniel Boyle ™ Plaintiff itis JUDGMENT lliam F, Gryder * defendant This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding, at the January-February Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, and It apnearing to the Court from the statement of counsel for the parties of record that the matters and things in cntroversy in this cause, as alleged in the pleadings, have been settled and that the defendant has agreed by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, M. C. Gryder, to ~ay to the plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept from the defendant the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty ($250.00) Dollars and the costs of tiis action, am the Court finding as a fact that this settlement is not injurious, unreasonable or otherwise harmful to said minor, and is a fair settlerent of this cause; NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT IT IS ORDSRED al. IGED AND DECREED that plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $50.00 and the costs of this action, This February 3, 195h. _— at Rousseau, aay tin, Sovers, Avery & Ward =888¢ ie Avery, Jr. ity. Tor plainci#? Hugh G Mitchell ty for defen: dant rt $+ Gryder oy ryder, Guardian Ad Litem tan FP. Grvder an’, Uryder, defendant. IN THE S UPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK es "oa TERM, 1954 SECOND WLEK «---—- JANUARY TERM 1954 Wednesday, February 3, 1954 Wednesday, February 3, 1954 (We. _ fo. 5497 Katherine D Sloop vs Wm E Sloop ~--~----~...-...-... Cenbseues NORTH CAROLINA IN THESUPERIOR CURT No. 5513 Dorothy Moore Leonard vs John Leonard ----- eeccecrce Continued IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY=FEBRUARY CIVIL TaRy ho. 5670 Jerry L Scott vs Inez Hill Scott Conn teuie Margie McDaniel argie pyaintafe, No. 5680 Mary Proctor Young vs Fred Grier Young - Cont inued is i 023 Ellis T Bailey T/A The Hudson Bailey Paint Co vs “ve TUDGMENT Mo» 5023 Wm D Fox T/A The Mack Fox Paint Co, «Wac~---e---6 @-- Continued William F, Gryder, Defendant Sp 3485 Robert H Moorefield vs R B Albea & wife -----.---~~. Continued lo, 5542 Lewis H Winecoff vs Yates S White - Continued by Consent This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, J. A, Rousseau, fio. 5554 Mrs Lona M Overcash vs Neal Blackwelder, Infant; Judge Presiding, at the January-February Term of Superior Court of Iredell ND Blackwelder & wife Kre WD Blackwelder ----~---- Cont inued Cnintin jio. 5575 Roberta Goforth Pierce BNF MC Goforth vs County, ae Bobby Franklin Pierce - Continued It appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel for the 4io, 5647 WG Blankenship, Jr. vs Sebastian Cansino Continued parties of record that the matters am things in controversy in this cause, /io. 4197 Mrs. Ruth Shives vs Larry Osborne Shives - Continued as alleged in the pleadings, have been settled am that the defendant has No. 5465 Betty Lou Holleman vs P D James & Wm James Continued agreed by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, M. C. Gryder, to pay tc the No. 5533 Roadway Express, Inc vs Frank Pardue Contimued plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept from the defendant the sun Ho. 554, TH Davis, Jr vs R W Yavis, Jr. - Continued of two Hundred ami Fifty ($250.0) Vollars and the costs of this actia, lhe. 5611 Piedmont Lumber & Mfg Co Inc vs H » Yortner--------- Continued and the court finding as a fact that this settlemert is not injurious, No. 5632 P S West vs WW Cloer ----------------- oo----------- Cont inued unreasonable or otherwise harmful to said minor, and is a fair settlement f ‘Yo. 5682 George Moss BNF Wm S Neel vs Blythe Bros Co. Continued this cause; io, Sp 3751 Gam H Ostwalt & wife Ruby Ostwalt, Katie 0 " lt & wife et al ------ Vontinued NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT IT IS ORDERED ANJUDGED AND DECREED ewman, et al vs Gaither Ostwa Re wenteee + that nlaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $250.00 am the costs of this action, ST TIES. No, 5372 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT This February 3, 1954. ee ee ee ee ee J, A. Rousseau JUDGE PRESIDING. IREDELL COUNTY. FEBRUARY, 1954 CIVIL TERM CUNSENTED TO: Mr. J, R, Cashion, trading and doing ° Margie G. McDaniel business as Star Milling Company, Plaintitr Plaintiff, Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward I Isaac T. Ave Jr. vs. “Ittys Tor stone A, A, Setzer, Hugh G, Mitchell] Defendant, Atty for defendant sg C, Gryder This cause coming on to be heard, ‘. C, Gryder, Guardian 4d Litem and being heard before His Honor, ; Term of J. A, “ousseau, Judge Presiding, and a Jury at the February, 1954 Civil Te William F, Gryder ing been submitted Willian ¥. Gryder, -detendant ‘he Superior Court of Iredell County and the following issue having to and aiswered by the Jury. L. Did the Plaintiff and Defendant bY the Defendamt? AN SWER : "Yes", wok ok ke ok ok ok ek enter into a contract, as alleged NI i 7 eee gry — 7 oe - ~s ) (a = Fs ’ fy ie sop w ’ a+ ae - ORE Ae ee | | Tew ag - ana LA —— | SaEtcs Srieweeee a ee a —_— fo wt att ao et acetone IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---< JANUARY TERM, 1954 Wednesday, February 3, 195i, 2, If so, what amount of damages is the Defendant entitled to recover? ANSWER: "$200.00, plus interest of 6% per annum until date paid, plus cancellation of demands in this case by the Plaintiff." 3. What amount, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover? ANSWER: "None" That upon the coming in of the verdict, the Plaintiff through his counsel, moved in its discretion to set aside the verdict for the reason that the same was not in conformity with the evidence and the law of the case; and the Court in its discretion granted the Motion; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDIRED, ADJUDGED AND DECKEED, that the verdict rendered by the Jury in the above entitled action be and the same is herely set aside in the discretion of the Court and a new trial of the action is ordered. Signed and entered in the Office of the Clerk of the Supe rior Court of Iredell County, at Statesville, North Carolina on February 5th, 1954. J. A, Rousseau . . A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding ye Oe OR x**e Ke K OK % IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 Monday, Fébruary 8th, 1954 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid on the 8th day of February, 1954, at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where His Honor, &, W. Hall, Judge, is present and presiding by appointment, as per the following commission: "OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT of the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA W. A. DEVIN CHIEF JUSTICE TO THE HONORABLE C. W. HALL One of the Special Judges of the Superior Courts of North Varolina. GREETING: WHEREAS, It has been made to appear to the satisfaction of the undersigned that the public interest requires that you hold the special one week term of the Superior Court for the vounty of Iredell, beginning the eighth day of February 1954, for the trial of civil cases, NOW, THEREFORE, I, W. A. DEVIN, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby find that the public interest so reouires and therefore Ido hereby commission you to hold said term of said Court for the County aforesaid, to begin on Monday, the eighth day of February, 1954, and continue one week, or until the business is disposed of. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, on this fourth day of January 1954. W. A, Devi Chie? Justice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina Mtest: John M, Stro Kiministrative Tssigtant™ and J, C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and opened Court by order of the Kourt, J.C. Rumple High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for the February Special Term, 1954, Iredell County Superior Court, toowsSs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ... FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 195, Monday, February 8th, 1954 Hubert Oook V. N. Campbell R, L. Beckham W. R. Patterson Ralph T Mills L, A. Lip»vard R, P. Swann J. J. Nichols R, B. “iller R, D. Wallace James E, Honeycutt, Jr, J.T Nicholson Ervin T. Bowie Roy L. White J, O. Hunter G. B. Cross Theodore Woerner Johnny W, Taylor Lester Sipes J. H. Hildebrand B, L. Morrison Guy Hobbs Frank Harris Clyde Davidson Lonnie G,. Lackey James H. Stevenson J. P. Stevenson Mrs. Sadie Hickman W. A. Hoover E. N. Ferguson Clyde White J. C, Murdock, Jr. C. E, Fraley Wayne Deal Mrs. Elmina M. Shelton Francis Ford Ralph T. Mills was out of tie State. J. O. Hunter, Hubert Cook, R. B. Miller and J. H. Hildebrand were excused by the Court. B, L. Morrison, Clyde Whiteand J. T. Nicholson were excused by Dr.'s certificates. Frank Harris lives out of the County. Clyde Davidson was not to be found. Francis Ford was deceased. The following men and women constitute what shall hereinafter be termed as the divorce jury #1" toewit: R. L. Beckham, L. A. Lippard, R. P. Swafin, Theodore Woerner, Guy Hobbs, Lonnie G. Lackey, Mrs. Sadie Hickman, Wayne Deal, V. N. Campbell, J. J. Nichols, R. D. Wallace and Lester Sipes. i oe DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being - ony > Sones sworn and empanelled answers the iss "t t follows: Inez Hill Scott submitted to it as NORTH CAROLINA FEDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Jerry L. Scott, Plaintiff Inez Hill Scott, Defendant ! ! vs i { | the 1. Were the Plaintiff and Defendant married, as alleged Complaint? Answer Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 Momiay, February &h, 1954 2. Have the Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes 3. Has the Plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer” Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 Jerry L. Scott Plainti ff vee JUDGMENT Inex Hill Scott, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the February Special Term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the issue submitted to them in favor of the Plaintiff and againgt the Defendant, as appears in the record; IT IS, THEREFORE, Ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of marriage heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside, and the Plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the Defer ant, It is further ordered that the Plaintiff pay the costs of this action, C, W, Hall Judge Presiding eee KK KK OH IN THE SUH RIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK w-e~ PEBRIARY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 FIRST WEEK --- FEBRUARY SPECIAL TE RM Monday, February 8th, 1954 Monday, February th, 195), » 1954 (NO. 5682 Nos. 5480 & 5537 These two cases are consolidated for the purpose of trial North Carolina. In the Superior Court Fogieman el led Iredell County. Special February Tern, 1954 — : ;. |, a a a Carl W. Rardoe’, Ad mr L. A. Lippard .. 4, Nichols ¥, Scott Murdock & Atlantic R. P. Swann Lester Sipes JUDGMENT Greyhound Corp Guy Hobbs W. R. Patterson Lonnie G. Lackey Jas E, Honeycutt, George Mos His Next l i vs i Clara Williams Wayne Deal Ervin T. Bowie 4 ss, By Friend, William S. Neel, vs Carl W Murdock, Admr W Scott Murdock, dec & Atlantic Greyhound Corp Blythe Brothers Company This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, ©¢, W, Hall, Special Judge, at this term of the court and it appearing to the Court Pending trial of these cases, ¢ne Vourt takes a recess until that this action is brought by George Moss, a ginor, through his Next Tuesday Morning, February 9th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, Friend, William S, Neel, against Blythe Brothers Company, alleging certain injuries su-fered by the minor plaintiff as an outgrowth of a collitin of an automobile in which he was riding with an automobile belonging to the defendant, Blythe Brothers Company on the 7th day of October, 1952; and It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff, George Moss, suffered some minor injuries, but none of them are incapacitating or of a serious nature, except a cut at the hair line on the back of his head, which will leave a permanent scar; and It further appearing to the Court that the liability of the de- fendant is questionable and that the injuries to the plaintiff are not of a serious nature and that the plaintiff and defendant, through counsel, have agreed upon a settlement of all the matters and differences between tie and for the permanent injury and any bills incurred for medical treatment by the payment of $250.00 to the plaintiff; The Court finds further that the injuries suffered by the plaintiff are not of a serious nature and that the settlement made is fair and reasonable and for the best interests of the minor plaintiff. ntiff It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the ple recover of the defendant the sum of $250.00 in full and complete settlement of all the injuries and damages suffered by him; that ” defendant pay the said sum into the Court to be disbursed by order he cts of of the Clerk of this Court. The defendant is taxed with t this action, includng a fee of $10.00 to the Next Friend. this Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Februar. C,. W, Hall wuae 9th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. e Special Judg Yt Sfp. FHA Uy Y eK KK RK KK RK OK OH JUNE PRESTOING a an ewe — sleet heb = ai A a scl Seis ee arene 7. Se ee » IN THE DPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -----~ FEBRURY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 Tuesday, February 9th, 1954 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, February 9th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A, M, JNos. 5480 & 5537 Ruth Ellen Fogleman vs Carl W. Murdock, Admr W Scott Murdock & Atlantic Greyhound Corp Jlara Williams vs Sarl W. Murdock, Admr W Scott Murdock & Atlantic Greyhound Corp Trial of said action resumed and continued through entire day, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Mornings February 10th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. CA (fo HK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WLEK «== FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 Wednesday, February 10, 1954 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, February 10, 1954 at 9:30 o'clock A. M, Mo. 5383 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. SPECIAL TERM, FEBRUARY, 1954 larry 0. Shives, { Plaintiff, j Vs. I FINAL JUDGMENT James M. Sample and W. W, | Winters, trading as S & W Trucking Company. ‘ Defendants. | This cause coming on to be heard before His Hona, Clarence W, Hall, Judge Presiding, at the Special Term, February, 1954 of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County; and it appearing to the Court that this cause was heard on a Demurrer before His Honor, Zeb B. Nettles, Judge Presiding, at the May, 1953 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County; That an order was rendered overruling the Demurrey, and the Defendants excepted; that it further appearing to the Court that the Defendants appea led from the order of Judge Nettles to the Supreme Court of North Carolina and that the appeal has been heard by the Supreme Court, and the order entered by Judge Nettles was reversed, without prejudice to the Plaintiff's right to move in the Court below for leave to amend his complaint under the provisions of G, S. 1-131; that a certified copy of the Judgement of the Supreme Court was duly transmitted to and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on January 5, 1954; that under the provisions of G. S. 1-131, the time has elasped for the Plaintiff to move in this Court for leave to amend his complaint. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed in accordance with the opinion rendered by the Supreme Court of North Carolina; that the Plaintiff will be taxed with the cost. Signed and entered in the Offie of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredeli County, on February 10th, 1954. . W, Hall C Clarence W. Nall, Judge Presiding. ee ee OK OF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --= FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1 FIRST WEEK --- FEBRUARY SPECIAL TER« » 1954 Thursday, February 11 1954 ’ , Wednesday, February 10, 1954 » 1954 This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on ‘Nos. 5480 & 5537 Ruth Ellen Fogleman Thursday Morning, February 11, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, vs Carl W Murdock, Admr W Scott Murdock & Atlantic Greyhound Corp flos, 5480 & 5537 Clara Williams Ruth Ellen Fogleman vs vs Carl W Murdock, Admr Carl W Murdock, Admr W Scott Murdock, & W Scott Murdock & Atlantic Atlantic Greyhound Corp Greyhound Lorp This action was resumed for trial and continued through the lane se sasene entire day. vs Varl W Murdock, Admr W Scott Murdock & Atlantic Greyhound Vorp Trial of this action is resumed and ti t} entire day. continued through the This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, February llth 19 . » 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, UW ekl This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, Pebry qj ‘ry 12, 1954, at 9:00 ofclock A. M. Dt UY 4 —JUDCE PRESIDING ZY . i eA : : in if —— -d — a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK #-- FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 Friday, February 12, 1954 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Friday Morning, February a2, 1954, at 9:00 o'clock A, M. Henry Carson vs Mary Dalton Carson Continued Ernest R Gaither vs Elizabeth Finger Gaither Continued Thomas H White vs Herbert D Wooten & Joyce Wooten Continued J F Goforth vs James M White Continued J N Cleary vs Mary E Vleary Poteet & husband J M Poteet & Merchants & Farmers Bk of Stv'l ----Continued by Consent 5592 Spencer Hartsell & wife Neta Hartsell vs Blythe Brose, CO e-----2--- ne een ne nnn nn nn n= Continued by Vonsent 5605 S A Little vs Henry 5 Setzer --<--------------------- - Continued Sp 3724 Eugene Mitchell & wife Jettie Mitchell vs John McDaniel & wife Nettie McDaniel, et al Continued 522 T V Mang m and Euver Lee Mangum vs Southland Petroleum Co Inc. Continued 5L94 iomas LE Hartness BNF Mrs Edna Shoemaker vs 1m Lambert & Robert Lambert Cont inued S White vs Stamey Steele Continued In the Superior Court Betty Lou Holleman, by her next friend, Mrs. Rachel Vickens, Plaintiff, VS. P, D. James and William James, Vefendants, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, V. W. Hall, Judge Presiding at the February Special Term of the Superior Vourt of Iredell Vounty; and it appearing to the Court from statement of counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the pjeadings have been agreed upon by the parties; that the defendant, William James, has agreed to pay to the plaintiff md the plaintiff has agreed to acer? the sum of $773.00 and the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction thereof, and to dismiss her claim against the defendant, P, D. James; and it is further agreed that the costs of this action shall IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- FEBRUARY SPSCIAL TERM, 195, Friday, February 12, 1954 include the sum of $20.00 for the Commissioner's fee in a preliminary examination of adverse witness heard in this cause, and the further sum of $5.00 for the stenographer taking said examination; And it further appearing to the Court from examination of the plaintiff, Betty Lou Hollepan, minor, and her mother and next friend, Rachel Dickens, who appeared in open court, that the plaintiff's injuries herein complained ofhave mended; and that this judgment is fair to and to the best interest of the plaintiff; And it further appearing to the Vourt from the statement of counsel that the parties hereto have agreed and consented to this judrment being paid in installments of $25.00 per month and payable into the hands of prescherk of roe Super eee Punt ne-phainsise, the first payment to be made on or before the 10th day of February, 1954, and a like sum on or before the 10th day of each month thereafter until this {udement is paid; NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover ofthe said defendant tie sum & 9773.00 and the costs of this action, as above defined herein to be taxed by the Clerk; that the said defendant be allowed AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, to pay off this judgment by installments of $25.00 per month to be paid the Clerk of the Suprior Court ; into the hands of Raed G-~ham-lee- attorney fom tie pieHeHas The first nayment to be made on or before the 10th day of February, 1954, and a like sum on or before the 10th day of each month thereafter unt il paids AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff be nonsuited as to any Claim herein against the defendant, P. D. James. This llth day of February, 1954. Ce. We Ha 11 Judge Presiding “A SENT: “eter Lou Holleman aintiff ickens “ext Friend of Plaintit? “Ge Chamblee ‘orney Tor PIaintit?” €lendant SOT, COLLIER & NASH By: " = A, Collier Way ueys for Defendant, il liam James a a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK #-- FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 195, Friday, February 12, 1954 Ao. 5465 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Betty Lou Holleman, by her next friend, Mrs. Rachel Dickens, Plaintiff, VS. P. D. James and William James ' Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. W, Hall, Judge Presiding at the February Special Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, for the purpose of directing the Vlerk to disburse the funds received or to be received from the Defendant, William James, under a judgment previously entered in this cause, to the following recipients and in the following manner: 1. To Davis Hospital, Statesville, North Carolina, for treatment to the Plaintiff, the amount of the balance due - $207.00. 2. To Attorney Fred G. Chamblee for legal services mndered to the Plaimtiff in this cause - $125.00. 3. To Mrs. Rachel Dickens the sum of $441.00, the same being the amount paid by her on the hospital expenses incurred by the Plaintiff for treatment at Davis Hospital, IT IS NOW ORDERED, that the aforesaid judgment in the principal su of $773.00 is to be paid by the Defendant, William James, by installment payments of $25.00 per month, to be paid in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina; that, by consent, the Clerk shall first pay out of the monks received, the claims of Davis Hospital and Attorney Fred G. Chamblee until such claims are fully paid, as follows: of the $25.00 monthly payment, the Clerk shall pay to Davis Hospital the sum of $15.00 and the remaining $10.00 to be paid to Attorney Bred 6. Vhamblee; that when the claims of the said hospital and the said attorney l have been satisfied in full, then the entire monthly payment of $25.00 shal be paid to the said Mrs, Rachel Dickens until her claim is satisfied in full, This 12th day of February, 1954. C. W, Hall Judge Presiding CONSENTED TO: ttorney for Plaint SCOTT, COLLIER & NASH BY 2. A, Collier | _—_-aa= orneys for Veten IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 195), Friday, February 12th, 1954 Mo. 5537 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. FEBRUARY, 1954, CIVIL TERM Williams —_ Plaintiff, Vs. Carl W. Murdock Administrator ISSUES i { 1 of W, Scott Murdock, deceased, and | Atlantic Greyhound Vorporation, Defendants. 1. Was the Plaintiff injured eee negligence of w. Scott Murdock, deceased, as alle ged in the plead ngs? ANSWER: Yes. 2. Was the Plaintiff injured by the negligence of the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation, as alleged in the pleadings? ANSWER: Yes. 3. What amount is the Plaintiff entitled torecover? ANSWER: $1,000.00. NORTH CAROLINA IN THe SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1954 Clara Williams Ve JUDG). ENT of W. Scott Murdock, Deceased, I t varl W, Murdock, Admr. ! and Atlantic Greyhound Corp. I | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Judge and a jury, at the February 1954 Special Term, and the jury having answered the Issues in favor of the plaintiff, as appears of record; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed hat the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of $1,000.00 and the costs of ™ action, the cost to include expert allowances as per individual Orders. This the 12th day of February, 1954. — os Sst PRESTON APPEAL ENTRIES Upon the coming in of the verdict, the defendants and each of them in “Pt time made a motion to set aside the verdict. Motion overruled as to @ 7” defendant and each of them excepted. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- FEBRUARY SPECIAL TERM, 195) Friday, February 12, 1954 The defendants and each of them in apt time gave notice ofappea} to the Supreme Court, to the signing of the judgment, and for errors assigned and to be assigned. Notice given in open court and further notice waived. The defendants allowed 60 days to make up and serve case on appeal and the plaintiff allowed 30 days thereafter to serve countercase or file exceptions. Ar»eal bond in the sum of 260.00 adjudged sufficient. C. W. Hall bo (No. 5480 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL VOUNTY. FEBRUARY, 1954, CIVIL TERM Ruth Ellen Fogleman, Plaintiff, VS. varl \. Murdock «administrator of W. Scott Murdock, deceased, atlantic Greyhound vorporation, and efendants, ) 1. Was the Plaintiff injured b> the negligence of W,. Scott Murdock, deceased, as alleged in the pleadings? ANSWER: Yes , 2. Was the Plaintiff injured by the negligence of the Atlantic Grey- hound vorporation, as alleged in the pleadings? ANSWER: Yes, 3. What amount is the Plaintiff entitled to recover? Ai, SWER: $3,500.00 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1954 Ruth Ellen Foglemén ~V~ Varl W. Murdock, Admr. of W. Scott Murdock, decd, and Atlantic Greyhound JOrp. 1 } JUD GYENT I igned This cause coming on for hea : the unders : os saring, and being heard before nage and a jury, at the February, 1954 Special Term and the Jury having answered the Issues in favor of the plaintiff, as appears of recorte 4 dffe” IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --FEBRUARY SPECIAL TeRy 1954 Friday, February 12, 1954 : Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of $3500.00 amd the costs of the action, the cost to include expert allowances as per individual Orders, This the 12th day of February, 1954. CG, W, Hall JUDGE PRESIDING APPEAL ENTRIES Upon the coming in of the verdict, the defendants am each of them in apt time made a motion to set aside the verdict, Motion overruled as to each defendant, and the defendants and each of them excepted. The defendants am each of them in apt time gave notice of apreal to the Supreme Vourt, to the signing a the judgment, and for errors assigned an to be assigned. WMotice given in open court and further notice waived The defendants allowed 60 days to make up and serve case on apreal em the plaintiff allowed 30 days thereafter to serve countercase or file exceptions. Appeal bond in the sum of $200.00 adjudged sufficient, GU. W. Hall, NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ‘uth Sllen Forleman “Ve | { on Murdock, Admr, 4 | It anpearing that Expert wi tne i be allowed as follows: Ur. R, A, Moore, who was upon attendance of the Court driving from Win ton-Salem, is entitled to an expert fee of $50,00 Yr. Wesley Palmes is entitled to an expert witness fee of $20.00, R, B, Kestley, Surveyor, at the reouest of plaintiff, made a survey “nd diagram of the scene of the wreck, and was paid $25.00 therefor by ‘Llege % Johnson, Attorneys of Winston-Salem, and that sum should be taxed *S expert fee and paid to Ellege and Johnson, and it further appearing that ‘e returned to the scene of the accident at the request of the Greynound “*Poration, for additional survey, and that the “reyhound Vorporation sh uld pay an expert fee in the sum of $15.00. NOW, THEREFORR, IT IS ORDERED: That the foregoing fees be taxed as above indicated, 0 ; the Superior Court is ordered to forward $25.00 to Elledge and Johnson, "ston~Sal em, when paid, the same to be taxed as a part of fhe S902. e é . C, W 1 and that the Clerk (No. 5437 JUDGMENT It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA of the defendants, E. ©. Fethe and wife, Gertrude H. Pethel, the sum of M Fall Term, 1954 $524.23 with interest thereon from the l6th day of ‘April, 1951, at the rate J. W. Moore ‘ of 6% per annum and the cost of this action. \ { v8. No. 382 Iredell County. i It is further ordered and adjudged that this judgment he, and it Howard Deal is hereby declared to be, a specific lien on the following described real This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: estate: BEGINNING at an iron stake at the inner edge of the sidewalk on the East side of Culp Avenue at its inter- section with Pine Street in the Town of Mooresville, North Carolinas; thence with the inner edre of the sidewald on Pine Street running about East 197 feet to an iron stake on Pine Street, formerly B. A. Troutman's corner; thence about South with what was formerly 8. A. Troutman's line 97 feet to an iron stake, formerly Rk. P. Pethel's corner on the BR. A. Troutman line; thence with R. P. Pethel's line running about west 197 feet to an iron stake at the inner edge of the sidewalk on Culp Avenue; thence with the inner edge of Culp Avenue running about North 60 feet to the BEGINNING point. Upon sideration whereof, this Court is of opinion that there is no error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable R. Hunt Parker Justice, be certifie: to the Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED And it is considered and adjudged further, that the plaintiff do pay the costs of the appeal in this Curt incurred, to wit, the sum of Thirty and 00/100 It is further ordered and adjudged that Kk. H. Peck be, and her phe dollars ($30.00), and execution issue therefor. ‘ ™ . aint A TRUE CY tr is hereby, appointed a commissioner to sell the said real estate after Adrian J. Newton due advertiserent as is provided by the Ganeral Statutes of North Carolina, Clerk of the Supreme Court and report his proceedings thereon to this Court. This cause is retained for further orders, this the 25 day of Filed in Clerk Superior Court office January 30, 1954. January, 1954. C. G. Smith, C.5.C. C. Ge Smith oe ~~~ Clerk of Superior Court Seeseceeaeeeses eee & & Wo. 5660 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNT ‘No. 5668 Town of Mooresville NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SS ee cat -_ pr Ss iS Sa E. ©. Pethel and wife, Town of Mooresville Gertrude H. Pethel This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing that a verified complant was filed in the above captioned case on November 2h, 1953; that summons was issued by the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on November 24, 1953, and that a copy of the complaint and a copy of the summons was served on each of the defendants on November 28, 1953, by the Sheriff of Iredell County; and it further appearing that more that 30 days have elapsed since the service of the copy of the complaint and Summons, and it further appearing that no answer has been filed. vs. ue Mi Malcolm and wife, irs. W. M, Malcolm, This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, ©. G. Smith, ‘lerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing that a verified complaint was filed in the above captioned case on December 3, 1953: that summons was issued by the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredel} County on December 3, 1953, and that a copy of the complaint and * copy of the summons was served on each of the defendants on December 6, 1953 by the Sheriff of Mecklenburg County; and it further appearing that nore * the copy of the than 30 days have elapsed since the service © led. Complaint and summons, and it further appearing that no answer has been file It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, W. M. Malcolm and wife, Mrs. W. M. Malcolm, the sum of $152.47 with interest thereon from the 16th day of April, 1951, at the rate of 6 % per annum and the cost of this action. It is further ordered and adjudged that this judgment be, and it is hereby declared to be, a specific lien on the following described rea} estate: Being all of Lots Nos. 1 and 2 in Block B of the Ham Smith, H. F. Walter property, as shown on a map recorded in Plat Book No. 3, at page 114, in the office of the Register of Deeds of Itedell County, North Carolina. It is further ordered and adjudged that R. H. Peck be, and he is hereby appointed a commissioner to sell the said real estate after due advertisement as is provided by the General Statutes of North Carolina, and report his proceedings thereon to this Court. This cause is retained for further orders, this the 25 day of January, 1954. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court we KR Ke mK mk Ke kk Kk mk me ‘No. 5652 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK otatesville Industrial Bank, Inc. Plaintiff, vs. C. L. Freeman, trading as Freeman Baz and Burlap Company, and Walter E, Miller, tradine as vtatesville Bag Company, Defendants, This cause coming on to be heard and béng heard before the Honorable + Ge Smith, Clerk of Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that the defendants and each of them have been duly served with summonses and that neither of them has filed answer or otherwise filed other pleadings within the time allowed by law and it further appearing to the Court that this is an action on a contract for a sum certain and that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final. It is therefore on motion by Land, Sowers, Ayery & Ward, that the tons ‘ d plaintiff have judgment against the defendants in the amount of Two Hundre 3s ws f vil xty Eight & 00/100 ($268.00) Dollars, with interest from the 15th day ° a ; une, 1953, until paid and for the costs of this action. This tha 29 day of January, 1954. C r G. Smith t oO uperior our erk kK oe we ee ek ke ke me Om Mo. 5597 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY g. T. Troutman, Plaintiff, VS. a Coit Ray Troutman, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and beine heard hefore the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the Plaintiff and the Defendant, that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties, and that the Plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in his action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff be nonsuited, and be taxed with the costs to he charzed by the Clerk. This 9th day of February, 1 C. G. Smith ; Clerk of Superior Court CONSENTED TO: g. T. Troutman Plaintiff FP, G, Chamblee Attorney for Plaintiff Coit Ray Troutman Defendant ADAMS DEARMAN & Winberry nD “Te “y C. B. Winberry Attorneys for Defendant. koe eK KR OK No, 5686 NORTH CAROLINAS In the Superior Court Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. Chapman & Wilhelm, Ince, — a North Carolina Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. FINAL JUDGMENT Harold W. Morrow and Forest W. Morrow, a partnership, trading and doing business as M & M Appliance and Furniture Company, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 15th day of February, 1954, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys, for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appear- inz to the Court: i That on January 12th, 1954, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. ae That summons was issued from this Court on January 12th, 1954, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. ate That the summons was served on the defendants by M. Maness, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on January 13th, 1954, by leaving with the defendants acopy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. -k- That the time for the defendants to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendants to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defend- ants. «fe That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands 4 su certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants under the contract and agreement of the defendants to pay 4 certain sum therefor; that an itemized verified statement, marked "Exhibit A", was attached to, and made a part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price t° ” paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the transaction. im That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "exhibit a", that the defendants are now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement marked npyhibit A", the sum of Five Hundred Thirty-Four Dollars and Ninety- Bight Cents ($534.98), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 14th day of September, 1953, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, Harold W. Morrow and Forest W. Morrow, a partnership, trading and doing business as M & M Appliance and Furniture Company, the sum of Five Hundred Thirty-Four Dollars and Ninéy- Eight Cents ($534.98), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from September li,, 1953, until paid, together with costs of this action taxed by the Court. This the 15th day of February, 1954. C._G, Smith Clerk of /Superior Court of Iredell County. xe Ke Re OK kK Ok Ok ‘No. 5678 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY G. W. Lee, Plaintiff, vs. DEFAULT AND INQUIRY A JUDGMENT v. C. Mize Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgement against the defendant by default and inquiry; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 31st day of .December, 1953; And it further appearing to the court that said summons, together with a copy of said complaint, were served on the defendant on the lst fay of January, 195k; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, °F other pleading has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff - ‘ave and recover tudement acainst the defendant for such damares as a Jury may award, and that inquiry of the amount of such damages be executed ®t the next civil term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before 4 Jury to determine the amount of said damaces. i Ww i xe . Fak ay ir, Bae a my f > a an f nr r a fj 4 a ae ae eatin ee = TE erie cas Pa —o-bguaerentalet: neg j to nates - == os aaa prom AS a orl an ae “Ser er This 17th day of February, 1954, C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Courp——— mw Ke me ke ke ke oe (No. 5460 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Mrs. A. P. Head vs. JUDGMENT Iredell Auto Co. of vtatesville, Inc. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court and it appearing to the Court that Clain and Delivery was issued in this matter on January 22, 19 sheriff returned a process showint that no property had been taken; and, it further ap: earing that no complaint has heen filed in the matter: is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the action 's hereby dismissed and the plaintiff taxed with the costs. of February, 1954. C. Ge Smith CLERK SUPERTOR IN THE SUPERIOR COUKT BsFORE THE CLERK JUDGMEN' Mayhew , + “Ale : : jgnec Cause coming on to be heard and heing heard before the undersié Clerk of Superior Court and it appearing to the Court that Claim and . oo Delivery was issued in this matter on November 17, 1952; that the Sheri! returned @ process showing that no property had been taken; and it furt arin : urther appearing that no complaint has been filed in the matter; . fe It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the action be and the same jis osts. S hereby dismissed and the plaintiff taxed with the ¢ This the 20th dav of February, 1954. C. Ge. Smith en /No. 5650 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Marie H. Lackey VS. JUDGMENT J. Lackey This cause coming on to he heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that is an action for absolute divorce and that the plaintiff through her attorney requests that a voluntary non-wuit be entered: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudved and decreed hy the Court that the action be and the same is hereby non-suited and the plaintiff taxed with the costs. This the 20th day of February, /No. 5497 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Katherine D, Sloop VS. William E. Sloop This cause coming on to be heard and heing heard before th undersigned Clerk of -Superior Court, and it appearing tothe Court that this iS an action for ansolute divorce and that the plaintiff through her attorney requests that a voluntary non-suit be entered; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the action be and the same is hereby non-suited and the plaintiff taxed with the costs. This the 20th day of February, 195k. C. G. Smith is CLERK SUPERIOR COURT xe Kk Kk Ke wk Ke Ke eH th ; s No. 5688 yoRTH CAROLINA No. 5659 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COU: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT : COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK IKEDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK rn. W. Davis, Jr. and H. W. Sloop, 1/A Davis Sup, ly Company MOTION vS. William K.Brawley, T/A Brawley Seed Company ° VSe N. F. Hall and lizabeth C. Hall Luther M. Waggoner wL11Z . . Now comes William R. Pope, one of the attorneys for the Plaintiffs Now comes William R. Pope, one of the .Attorneys for the Plaintiff in the in the above entitled action, and would respectfully show unto the Court above entitled action, and would respectfully show unto the Court that the matters . that the matters and things set out in the complaint have been fully and things set out in the complaimt have been fully settled by the parties hereto: settled by the parties hereto: It is therefore moved that the Court enter a judgment of voluntary non-suit in It is therefore moved that the Court enter a judgement of the above entitled acion. voluntary non-wuit in the above entitled action. This the 19th day of February, 1954. This the 19th day of February, 1954. William R. Pope William R. Pope Attorney Attorney NORTH CAROLINA N THE SUPERIOR COURT NOATH CZROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK SA weeee sen ie IRJDELL COUNTY REFORE THE CLERK R. W. Davis, Jr. and H. W. Sloop T/A Davis Supply Company william K. Brawley, T/a Brawley Seed Company VS. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT VSe JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NCN-SUIT Luther M. vVazggoner N. F. Hall and tlizabeth C. Hall This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by his Honor, This cause coming on to be heard, and bang heard by his Honor, C. G. Smith, . : : ; - ; : I f Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on motion of William R. Pope, one 0% the attorneys for the plaintiff in the above entitled action, and it appearing ° the n fully he Court that the matters and things set out in the complaint have bee adjusted and settled between the parties: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that a judgment of voluntary C. G. -Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on motion . William R. Pope, one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs in the above entitled action, and it appearing to the Court that the matters and things set out in the complaint have been fully adjusted and settled between the parties; It is therefore ordered , adjudged and decreed that a judgment of this 2h day o eS voluntary non-suit be, and is hereby, entered in the above entitled non-suit be, and is hereby, entered in the above entitled action, reOEUNET, 875K action, this 24 day of February, 195k. C. G. Smith ee si Clerk Superior Court C. Ge Smith Clerk Superior Court Kee Kk KK Ke KK OK ee I : VE ee S Cho aoe | ) ( cake ee ee ee — —~ DP PORO cme eas to. o. 2a . i SEE ‘No. 5687 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Piedmont Bank & Trust Company, Plaintiff, VS. Ruth Cashion, Sara Cashion and G. C. Cashion, Defendants. Now comes William R. Pope, one of the attorneys for the Plaintifr in the ahove entitled action, and would respectfully show unto the Court that the matters and things set ovt in the complaint have been fully settled by the parties hereto: is therefore moved that the Court enter a judgment of voluntary above entitled action. 195h. 19th dav of February, Nilliam R. Pope Attorney NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUFERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Piedmont Bank & Trust Company, Piainciff, wW aiva ion, Sara Cashion Cashi Defendants. on to he heard, and being heard by his Honor, C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on motion of William Rk. Pope, one of the attorneys for the plaintiff in the above entitled action, and it appearing to the Court that the matters and things set out in the complaint have been fully adjusted and settled between the parties: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that a judgment « voluntary non-suit be, and is hereby, entered in the above entitled action, this 24 day of February, 195k. OO C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court i JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NON-SUI? Ao. 5422 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY , C. Miller L Plaintiff, A, Banks Culp, Defendant. THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Assistant Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County and it appearing to the Court from statemant of counsel for hot} parties that all matters in controversy arising upon the pleadings i ~~ settled, compromised and adjusted and that the plaintiff submit to a Judgment of non-suit forever dismissine the clain cause of action set forth in the Complaints; that the defendand desir A to submit to a Judgment forever dismissing his counterclain set his Answer and that the defendant will pay "er ~ oO - NOW, THEREFORE, RY CONSENT IT IS ORDERED, 1. That the plaintiff be and he hereby non-suit the claim and cause of action set forth laint he same hereby is forever dismissed and »harred. 2. That the defendant be and he hereby his counterclaim and the claim and 1S f action set forth forever dismissed and barred. Answer be and the same hereby 3. That the costs he taxec azainst the defendant. lst day of March, 195 Aft wn j “ 7 CONSENT : 4 wiser C. MILLER, Plaintiff. Srant_Bolmer GRANT BOLMEX, Attorney for the Plaintff. eenermit Caldwell ‘it CALDWELL, Attom ey for the Plaintiff. t tT" iu ha A r Ss £anks Culp 4s BANKS CULP, Defendant. CARPENTER & WEBB *y_Allen B. Webb Attorneys for the Defendant. eek KKK OR OK OH eae -_ mamigmane po ere eae oe os INo. 5693 North Carolina Superior Co Iredell County urt A. L. Mills Jr., Mrs. A. L. Mills and L. Ne Mills T/A N. B. Mills Gin Co. Vs Robert H. McKay This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court on this March 4th, 1954 and it appearing to the Court that this action is based on note given by defendant to the Plaintiffs for 3763.69 with interest from October 12th, 1953; that defendant was served by summons on January 29th, 1954 and has failed to answer and plaintiffs are entitled to judgment by default. It is therefore decreed that Plaintiffs recover judgement against the defendant Robert H. McKay in the arount of 3763.69 and interest from October 12th, 1953 until paid and that he be taxed with the cost = Smith ouperior ) No.5222 (ORTH CAROLIMA N THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Herman Mitchell Plaintiff, vs 7 } vy e " } johnny George »Waugh and Ye lie waugen, ; Defendants, this cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the under- he : 4 : : . . : ing tot Signed Clerk of -Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing , gummors Court that the defendant, Johnn eorge Waugh was never served with and th h i oO ow uf ° and that the defendant, C. M. Waugh filed answer on the 30th day of 1 EX ° . fandant August, 1953; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant, - lv dass . j ° gun ve Me Wauch has agreed that Judgment be entered in this cause for th £ POF > of $262.00 together with the costs of this action: It is therefore ordered, considered, adjudged and decree | . &242.0 tiff have and recover of the de*endant, ° ’ ue “Yauch, the arm of d that the al with interest of this date until paid, together with the costs of this action. This 8 day of March, 1954. i C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court By Consent of: Cc. M. Waugh ” Defendant, C. M. Waugh Execution not to issue until after April 1, 1954. If defendant pays $200.00 and the costs on pr before April i, 1954 this judgment is to be cancelled. We. N. Battley Atty for plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERMS 1954 Monday, March &th, 1954 NORTH CAROLINAS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM? 1954 Ke it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for ¢ the State and County aforesaid, on the 8th day of March, 1954, A. D., when and vhers His Honor, J. A. Kousseau, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the Rifteenth Judicial District March Term, 1954, is present and presiding, J. Ce Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the March Term, 1954, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit; Be We Hollifield Gray A. Stutts i Cowan lr. Warlick G. Le Parker Dixon Stevensor Mrs. J. Moddy Smith Johnson Shoemake? E. G. Charles Kivette, Jr. Mack Honeycutt W. &. Taylor D. He Litele nr osey ie. Be Harmon T ile « Marvin &. Owens \. Mayhew William E. Benfield Marvin Sigmon . Jares Crawford C. A. oykes ¥- G. T aylpr E. L. Dixon F. Bb. Holland kobert C. Archie Mrs. lrene darmon Ne G. McHargue fF. J. Owens James Theodore . Warlick and Marvin Sigmon were excused by the Court. id L. Shoemaker was not to be found. Mrs. J. Moody Smith and James Theodore were excused by Dr's certificates. William E. S3enfidd livea in Catawba County. J. S. Johnson was not to be found. Helland was out of the State - No Service. The following men and women constitute what shall hereinafter be termed the "Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: cc. W. Hollifield, - B, Stevens”, Geo. M. Honeycutt, W. Rk. Josey, Mrs. H. W. Mayhew, Robert Marlin, John L. Marlin, A. M. Redmond, Bertha Burke, C. W. Horne, Gray he Seats and G. L. Parker. Wo. 5673 DIVORCE | 3 The Divorce Jury #1 being dul empanelled answers the issues su it as follows: y sworn and > Robert Y. Clendenin pmitted vs. Janie Lee Clendenin Sole custody, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM 1954 Monday, March &th, 1954 er TH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY Y. Clendenin Robert Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOK COURT -vS- +e Lee Clendenin -_ Defendant 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes 2, Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes WORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Robert Y. Clendenin, Plaintiff -VS- Janie Lee Clendenin, Defendant This cause coming on to he heard hefore the undersigned Judge holding the 7 ‘ : “ . , ° he regular term of Iredd@l Superior Court and a jury dt jury having answered the issues suhmitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and agains A +h ‘he defendant, as appears in the record; and It further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff, who has had cust : ; ' ‘ ; : ody and control of the children named in the complaint during the enti : ' . . . , re separation, is a fit and suitable person to award sole custody ol the said children; 29 Trop : IT 18} THER considered and adjudged that the bonds of "arriag . age heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the Same : : are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute d ‘Yorce fron the defendant. D 28 wren miecs y IT IS FURTHER decreed that the plaintiff be, and he is hereby granted the control, and supervision over the children born to the marriage; namely ‘ Robert Neal Clendenin, age ll Steven Young Clendenin, Age g Spencer Lee Clendenin, aze 6 It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. J, A. Rousseau Judee Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- MARCH TERMS 1954 Monday, March 8th, 1954 ie DIVORCE Wo. 5674 The Divorce Jury f#lfeing duly sworn Ernest R. Gaither answers the issues submitted to it as follows: VS. Elizabeth Finger Gaither NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRr IREDELL COUNTY Ernest R. Gaither Plaintiff vs ISSUES Elizabeth Fineer Gaither Defendant Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint: Answer. Yes. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Yonpalint? Answer. Yes. 3 Has the defendant been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more ’ than six months next preceding the filing of this complaint? nsw Vas Answer. es NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT YREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM irnest R. Gaither, Plaintiff vs JUDGMENT Slizateth Finger Gaither, Defendant me. 2 E ‘ ” 19 L This cause coming on to be heard and heing heard at the March Term, 19 . : ny r a . ‘ J Presid. Superior Court of Iredell County before His HYnor, J. A. Rousseau, Judge Y . ; ‘ . eo it, in the and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, as fully appears in the iy, t : m It is, therefore, ordered, adjudeed and decreed that the bonds 0: . : ‘ same heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant be, and the ‘ . jivorce are, hereby dissolved, and the Plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute © from the Defendant. This the Sth day of March. 1954. I-A fousse ——— ~~ Judge Presiding x* eK ek wk Kk ke eK OK and empane])e: recor; atrimony IN THE SUPenlon COUR FIRST WEEK ------- MARCH TERM M, Oc Mcnday, March &th, 1954 sii fio. 5675 es G. Overcash DIVORCE Jame Plaintiff The Divorce Jury /1 be; and empaneled answers the to it as follows, ng duly sworn issues submitted arwell Overcash Suomitted laomi H wr Defendant yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM? 1951, es G. Overcash — Plaintiff vs Naomi Harwell Overcash Defendant I Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as allesed the complaint? Answer: II Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: 1il Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fron other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY vames G, Overcash Plaintif vs ‘80rd Harwell Overcash Defendant This cause coming on to he heard and being heard before His Hon ] f +) : Mar T’ Qs “or, Je A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding and a jury at the March Term, 194, Ol ti q ° i : 4 'o1 y “ne Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that the defendant and the following has been personally served with process, issy ' : ; *S having been submitted to and answered by the Jury: 1, Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the ouplaint ? Answer: "Yegn *. Has the Plaintiff been a hona “ide resident of the State of North “Polina for f this action? more than six months next preceding the bringing © Answer: "Yesn IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FinsT wesk - MARCH TiaM, 1954 Monday, March 8th, 1954 3. Have the Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart from other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: ."Yes" Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintire, James G. Overcash, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Naomi Harwell Overcash, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and Defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, And it is further ordered that the Plaintiff pay the cost of this action and be taxed by the Clerk. 1 This & day of March, 1954. J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding x we ek x Ok OK ke me Kk OK DIVORCE The Div orce Jury #1 being duly sworn and Cowan H. wagner empanelled answers the issues submitted to it vs as follows: \No. 5690 . alaine ‘ and defendant married as alleged in the comp.asn and defendant separate and have they lived separate ; $ . ye sw ; thi two years preceding the filing of complaint in tmis lave the plaintiff and defendant been residents and citizens — af Nath 0 ; : : : : , ing State of Nath Carolina for more than six months immediatéy preced the complaint ate ‘(ORTH CAROLINA N THE SUPERIOR COUR! IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM 1954 Cowan H. Wagner VS. } jora Pearl Waener j This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before 1 answevet the issues as set out in the record. It is therefore ordered and adjudced that the bonds of matrimon existing between Cowan H, Waener and Nora Pearl Wagner be, and the -.. u hereby diseolved, and the phintiff is cranted an absolute divorces It is t as ordered that the cost of this action be taxed by the Clerk of this Cour ‘ ying Li 4 j » .Ve r r ury ha His Honor Judge J. A, Rousseau and a jury, and being heard, and the J y neretofer’ ie. + vn@ ~ IN THE SUPERIUR CUURT FIRST WEEK ------- MARCH TERM? 195, Monday, March &th, 1954 provided by statute. Je A. Rousseau Judge Holding Courts of the 15th Judicial District lia ho. 5691 DIVORCE 0. 297 The Divorce Jury #1 heinge duly gilly Sue Hankins empanelled answere the issues sui 8 it as follows: Janes Franklin Hankins sworn and submitted to ORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Billy Sue Hankins Plaintiff vs Jares Franklin Hankins Defendant I Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged complaint? Answer: ae Has the plaintiff been a bona fide Carolina for more than six months next action? Answer: Aaa Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate an other for two years next preceding the bringing Answer: Yes Defendant Tes . ty - this cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His honor, ve Ron ? = : Maren T QO5 ) “e S0USS@au, Judge Presiding and a jury at the March Term, 1954, of the 31, ‘ 2 ; : Cesay - Uperior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that ihe defendant has been personally served with process, and the following 18 ‘ ‘ 2 . Sues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: W i od in 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as allege Complaint? 4nSwer: "Yesn IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1954 Monday, March &th, 1954 2. Has the Plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes" 3. Have the Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes" Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff, Rillvy Sue Hankins, be and she is hereby eranted an absolute divorce from the defendant, James Franklin Hankins, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and Defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, And it is further ordered that the Plaintiff pay the cost of this action y 1 and he taxed by the Clerk. This %thday of March, 1954. J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Daniel in Reavis, Defendant. | a : bao in the l. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in%t eonplaint? ANSWER: _ YES __ 2. lias the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of ‘North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER :_ Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and a part from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COUNT 1KEDELL COUNTY Violet W. Keavis, riaintiff, vs. Daniel Austin Reavis, Defendant. | Th 4 ‘ or [his cause coming on to he heard and beine heard before His Honk» a : the J. A, Rousseau, Judge Presiding, and a jury in the March Civil Term of IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM? 195), Monday, March &th, 195i, superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been personally served with Summons, and the following issues having been submitted and answered hy the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleved in the compla int? ANSWER: "Yes". 2, Has the plaintiff heen a hona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next precedine the brinzins of this action? ANSWER: "Yes", 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fron eachother for two years next precedinz the brinzving of this action? ANSWER: "yes". NOW? THEREFORE, It { 3 * i s ordered, adjudzed, and decreed that the plaintiff, Violet W. Reavis, be, and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendsnt, Daniel .Austin seavis, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, be, and they are hereby dissolved. And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact, that there are two minor unmarried children of the said marriage, namely, Patsy Anne Reavis, age 12 vears, and %onita Sue heavis, aze ll years, who have been living with their mother, the plaintiff, since the separation of their parents: and it further appearine to the Cowt, and the Court finding as a fact, that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the said minor children, and that the hest interests of the said children would he served by being in the custody of their said mother; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the plaintiff be, and she is hereby sranted full and complete custody and control of the said minor children, until the further order of this Court. AND 1T IS FURTHEK ORDSRED, that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to he taxed by the Clerk. This *thday of March, 1954. J . Rousseau Je A ~~ Judge Presiding kek ke KK KK KH IN THe oUPenIOn COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1954 Monday, March 8th, 1954 DIVORCE 4 The Divorce Jury #1 being duly s empanelled answers the issues aati it as follows: , No. 5720 NORTH CAROLINA Betty Ann Barnhardt vs Bruce Y. Barnhardt NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Betty Ann Barnhardt, Plaintiff vs Bruce Y. Barnhardt, Defendant Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint’ Answer__Yes_ 2e Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state of North Carolina continuously for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer_ Yes _ 36 Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for a perioc of rore than two years continuously next preceding the institution of this action, as allezed in the complant? Answer Yes NOKTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IkeDe&LL COUNTY Betty Ann Barnhardt, Plaintiff vs Bruce Y. “arnhardt, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned judge an® : : ing a jury at the term above mentioned and being heard, and the jury havins returned for a verdict the answere to issues set out in the record, finding that the plaintiff and the defendant were married complaint, and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the ot Carolina continusouly for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action. ‘hat to said union of marriage n° children were born no children; and that the pla intiff and the defendant hv been separated from each other for a period of more than two years continuously before berinning this action. ‘ for It is, therefore, on motion of Ernest R. Alexander, Attorney the plaintiff, considered, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the oa , psolute plaintiff, BETTY ANN BARNHARDT, be and she is hereby granted 4 ® : +he as alleged 17” ttaveh ate of NOT ue IN THE SUPERIOR COURT wook MAKCH TERM? 195, Monday, March 8th, 1951 foal Finol divorce from the defendant, BRUCE Y. BARNHARDT. Let the plaintiff pay the cost in this action, this the &th day of March, 1954. J. A. Rousseau JUDG PRESIDING HK KK OK OK OK OK OK OK JNo. 5335 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Number 5335 IREDELL COUNTY. sarch Term, 1954 Frank Rk. Jelleff, Inc., Plaintiff, VS. VOLUNTARY NONSUILL Kobert 4, Stallings, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and veins heard before the Honorable Judge J. A. tousseau, Judge Fresidins at the ».arch term of the Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attornevs for the plaintif that the plaintiff has elected to and desires to take a voluntary nonsuit in this action: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintift be nonsuited and taxed with the costs to be charged by the Cierk. This the 8th day of March, 1954. ___ de A. iiousseau Judzve rresiding Adams, Dearman & Winberry Attorneys for the Plaintiff. 3y \ionroe Adams. Ke KKK mK No. 5671 NORTH CAKOLINA, In the Superior VLourt IREDELL COUNTY. March Term 1954 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: & We Hollifield, k. B. Stevenson, Geo. M. Honeycutt, w. kK. Josey, "rs. H. we Mayhew, Robert Marlin, John L. Marlin, A. Me iiedmond, Bertha Burke, Ww. Horne, Gray A. Stutts and L. Parker. W. Re Holland, Plaintiff, vs. a vatesville Development Company , Ce oporPoration, S. Wallace G. mann, Executor of the Estate 133UsS 4 fonedore Wallace, S. Wallace Seeeie ts and wife, Leah S. Hoffman, Siefes Hoffman, unmarried, Jules L. and wit? unmarried, Herbert Hoffman Unknow &, Babette Hoffman, and all ville b Stockholders of the States- Perso evelopment Company, and all reht who may have or claim any the r? title, interest or estate in Sanines estate described in the 'Plaint, ALL OF WHOM ARE ALSO UNKNOWN, Defendants. ges Pt Oe ee ~ a a aa os at a ems. ae F } ‘ A : : ; ’ i - ape. - 5 { A ar) ¢ ‘ ; . { t| { bat ay! | \ oe 1a ‘ ; 3 1) Me f } ‘ . ; t t ie! } : t : Sa 4 { : it at ie . hye, 15 ‘ . pena , ea ed : i b 1s 1 j ete a ' - te f ‘ thé g =a. é a i ae re i 1 ty y ae } F Mle — IN THE SUPERIOK COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1954 Monday, March 8th, 1954 1. Has the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, been in the adverse POSSession os the lots described in the complaint in this action, under known and visible lines and boundaries, adverse to the defendants and all others, for twenty years prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes 2. Has the plaintiff, wW. ii. Holland, been in the adverse Possession under color of title of the lots described in the complaint in this action, under known and visible lines and boundaries, adverse to the defendants an; all other persons, for seven years prior to the commencement of this actior: ANSWER Yes. 3. Does the deed of John L. Milholland, Tax Collector of the City ry of Statesville, dated July 7, 1926, filed for record on the %th day of November, 1924, and recorded in Deed book 94, page 373, in the office of the Recister of Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina, convey the lots described in the complaint to the plaintiff, wW. R. Holand, in fee simple’ ANSWER _Yes. __ NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court March Term 1954 IRSDELL COUNTY. W. t. Holland, Plaintiff, VS. JUDGMENT Statesville Development Company, a corporation, 5S. Wallace Hoffman, “executor of the istate of Isidore wallace, S. wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffmann varrie Hoffman, unmarried, Jules L. Kaufman, unmarried, lierbert Hoffman and wife, Fabette Hoffman, and all unknown stockholders of the States- ville Levelopment Company, and all persons who may have or claim any richt, title, interest or estate in the real estate described in the conpeint, ALL OF WHOM ARE ALSO UNKNOWN. Defendants.. | T ' Presic:t (his cause being heard before His Honor, J. A. Rousseau, Judge a , : at and Holding the Courts in the Fifteenth Judicial District, and a Jurys aa ‘is ' Carolin the March 1954 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North © he jury’ and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by ° "1. Has the plaintiff, W.R. Holland, been in the advers 4 visi . a We . an s of the lots described in the complaint in this action, under knowor twent! lines and boundaries, adverse to the defendants and all others, years prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER _ Yes @. Has the plaintiff, Ww. R. Holland, been in the etvere: under color of title of the lots described in the complaint def under known and +‘sihl= limes and houndaries, adverse to the ° t all other persons, for seven vears prior to the commencement of ANSWEK_ Yes, lle Development Company property, and which plat a possessi" ., IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM? 1954 Monday, March &th, 1954 . Does the deed of John L. Milholland, Tax Collector of th city of Statesville, dated July 7, 1926, filed for record on the Sth day of November, 1928, and recorded in Deed Book 94, pasw 373, in the office of the Recister of Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina, convey the tate described in the complaint to the plaintiff, Ww. R. Holland, in fee simple? ANSWER __ Yes PP And the Court from the summonses, the returns thereon, the affidavits, the complaint, and the evidence offered hy the plaintiff, finds: wie That summons in this action has been duly served on all of the defendants. win That the time for answering expired more than ten days before the cpnvening of this Court, and that the time for the defendants to answer or otherwise plead was not extended, and that no answer or other pleading has bean filed by any of the defendants in this action. -3- That this action was at issue for more than ten days prior to the commencement of this term of Court on the 8th day of arch, 1954. she That the deed of John L. ‘iilhollani, Tax .Collector of the City of Statesville, dated July 7, 1926, and recorded on the Sth day of November, 1928, in “eed Book 94, page 373, in the office of the hegister of Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina, conveyed the lots described in the complaint in this action to the plaintiff, #. Kk. Holland, in fee simple, and that under said deed, the plaintiff, 4. . Holland, became the owner in fee simple of the lots described in the complaint. IT 1S, THEREFORS, ORDERED? ADJUDGED AND DiCRooD: 1. That the plaintiff, Ww. R. Holland, is the owner in fee simple of the lots described in Paragraph 7 of the complaint, and particularly described as follows: Lying and being in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North perolina, on the East side of Fifth Street, and particularly described as Ollows: Being all of Lots Nos. 6 and 7 in Block No. 2, as platted, mapped and a S j t Company, known as the States- wn on the plat of the Statesville Developmen wy & wees te sae Book 15, page 441, Iredell f ounty Kegistry, and to which —- i hereby made for a further and more complete description, and - at aheiiend identical lots conveyed to W. &. Holland by the deed of — : 9h are 393 Tax Collector of the City of Statesville, recorded in Deed boo » pag ’ redell County Registry. 2. That the defendants be, and they are hereby forever excluded and in the varred from hereafter claiming any right, title, interest oF essase : taahove lots described in the complaint, and particularly described hereinabove, 5 d. Adverse to the fae simple ownership of the plaintiff, W. K- Hollan indexed, and recorded in the 3. That this judgment be docketed, | 1 County, North Carolina, office of the Clerk of the Superior court of Iredel f Iredell County certify it to the and that the Clerk of the Superior Court © IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, March &th, 1954 Kecister of Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina, and that the same be indexed and recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Irede]} County, North Carolina, and then returned to the Clerk's office, and the Kegister of Deeds of Iredell County is ordered to make a notation - the deed of John L. bilholland, Tax Collector of the City of Statesville, to Ww. k. Holland, recorded in Deed Book 94, page 373, referring to this judgment, and the hook and page wherein the same is recorded in her office, L. That the cost of this action be taxed azainst the plaintiff by Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. This the 8th day of March, 1954. 56678 G. We Lee vs Ce. C. Mi -~ Continued by Consent 5023. Sllis T. Bailey T/A The Hudson Bailey Paint Co vs Wm D Fox T/A The Mack Fox Paint Co--- Continued by Consent Sp 3485 Robert H Moorefield vs R B Albea & wife-- Continued for Plaintif! 5263 rs. Clyde D Jenkins vs Charles W Lewis * orrison Furniture & Fixture Co Inc-------- Continued by consent Sp 3589 lirs L O Williams & Clyde L Williams vs vrtle Williams * hushand B F williams----- Continued Sp 3590 rs. L O dilliarms vs Myrtle Williams & husband F F Williams ---- Continued 9th, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Mare 1954 at 9:30 o'clock A. M IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MARCH TERM? 1951, Tuesday, March Sth, 195,” This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Mie Tuesday Morning, March 9th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. \No. 5662 D1 VORCE The Divorce Jury #1 being duly swor q Viola Jordan Tevepauzh empanelled answers the issues pe ea Maga vs as follows: i Robert Daniel Tevepauzh NORTH CAROLINA IN IREDELL COUNTY Viola Jordan Tevepaugh Plaintiff vs Robert Daniel Tevepaush Defendant Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully arried as alleced in the complaint? Answer:_ Yes lj Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next precedine the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes III Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fro each other for two years next precedinz the bringing of this action: v IN THE SUPERIOR CO ARCH TERM, 1954 ‘1 abi _Tevepaugh Plaintiff vs JUDGMENT h we " : nn Robert Daniel Tevepauch Defendant ° ‘ : ” 1] u ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His bonor, 1 ‘ ‘ * n -_ oO ft t e ‘* A. housseau, Judce Presiding and a jury at the March verm, 1°54, of th 3 : : hue Court that Sup rior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Vourt defendant has been properly served with process by publication, and the f ; : b e jury: ‘Ollowine issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury 1, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as allered in the Corplaint? Answer: "Yeagn ol lol . Mea ns = te - ce fo . ; > eB, ifs aa = anne ae an ee if yy a - VE I ; i * h -_ ie a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WESK MARCH TERMS? 1954 Tuesday, March 9th, 1954 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes" 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each dher for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes" Now, therefore, it SB ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintirs, Viola Jordan Tevepauch, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce fro, the defendant, Robert Daniel Tevepaugh, and the bonds of matrimony heretofcrs existince hetween the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action and to be taxed by the Clerk. This 13 day of March, 1951. __J,_ A. fiousseau Judge Presiding & & Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: &. G. Charles, W. E. Taylor, ar a - rs ~y A ° eet? ain G fn ‘owan R. Harmon, E. L. Dixon, Robert C. Archie, Ne. Ue. “Cnargue, Me ve Cowan, Mi y d C. F. Dixon, Wilkes Kivett, J1 D. H. Little, “rs. Irene ‘armon an Marvin E. Owens. SUPERIOR COURT. efendant ; ant af 1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defend red in the complaint’ AnSwers NO ‘ imence a8 2. Was the plaintiff injured by his own contributory neglis alleced in the answer? Answer: ' yer fror 3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to reco the defendant? Answer: —— pitfas 4. Was the defendant damaged by the negligence & the plain alleced in the counter-claim? Answer: No a ; IN THE SUPEKIUN COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1954 Tuesday, March 9th, 1954 5. What amount, if any is the defendant entitled to recover from the plaintiff? Answers ___ NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY J. F. Goforth, Plaintiff VS. JUDGMENT James M. White Defendant } This cause, coming on to he heard and being heard before His Honor, J. A. Rousseau, Judze Presiding, and the jurv at the March 1954 term of the Superior Court of Iredell County; and the followinz issues having been submitted to the jurv and answered hv ther as follows: l. Was the plaintiff injured by the neclicence of the defendant as allered in the complaint? Answer: No. 4. Was the defendant damazed by the necligence of the plaintiff as alleged in his counterclaim? Answer: No. Now, therefore, it is orcered, adjudced, and decreed that the plaintiff recover nothing from the defendant and that the defendant recover nothing fron the plaintiff in this action by reason of his counterclaim and the plaintiff is hereby taxed with the costs. This 9th day of March, 1954. J. A. Rousseau __ Judge Presiding bio. $425 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ny ve We. Beaver Plaintiff Joe Downes a as Blackwel] nd Stokes } } ! v8. } } } j ! Defendants This cause coming on to be heard bere his Honor, J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding at the March term 1954 Iredell County Superior Court, ve % appearing to the court that the plaintiff and the defendants 7 ye and recover judgment by consent acreed that the plaintiff ha of the defendants, Joe Downes and Stokes Blackwell, in the sum of “x Hundred and no/100 (/$600.00) Dollars: SE er a Gt ae Oe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- MARCH TERM, 1954 Tuesday, March Sth, 1954 It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiry have and recover of the defendants, Joe Downes and Stokes Blackwell ’ the sum of Six Hundred and no/100 (600.00) Dollars and the costs of th; ris action. Mar. 9, 1954. J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding By consent: Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward lsaac T. AVERY, Jr. ile, Attornevs ror the Plaintiff Grant Bolmer Attornevs for the Defendants JCe Jowns, Jie Stokes Blackwell c. tiartness i Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Bina vhoenaker E. W. Hollifield, R. B. Stevenson, reo. M. Honeycutt, C. A. Sykes, Mrs. tl. W. Mayhew, Robert Marlin, John L. Marlin, A. M. Redmond, T. G. Taylor, C. W. Horne, Grady A. otutts, and G. L. Parker. case the court takes a recess until (his Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday porning, arch 10th, 1954, at 9:30 O'clock aA. ca cle 4 _IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1954 Wednesday, “March 10, 1954 This Honorable Court convenes accordins to adjournment on March 10th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, f . s f Wednesday Morning, So, 549l WORTH CAROLINA, IN THE IREDELL COUNTY. ARCH Thomas E. Hartness, by his Next Friend, Mrs. Edna Shoemaker’, VS. Sam Lambert and Robert Lambert. During the course of the trial the plaintiff announced open court that he would take a voluntary non-suit, and the defendants and each of them announced in open court that they would take a voluntary non-suit: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudzed and decreed that be and he is hereby non-suited, and the defendants ar hereby non-suited on their counterclain. it is further ordered, by witnesses and the defendants shall cost of the action to be taxed azaist the against the plaintiff and one-half azainst This the 1lOth day of March, 1° No. 5509 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: R. B, Stevenson, Geo. M. Honeycutt, Mrs. Redmond, T. 3, Taylor, C. W. Horne, Grady A. 8 , *. L. Dixon, E. Taylor and E. G. Cowan. LREDELL COUNT hobert Lee Beaver 7 sical Plaimiff vs. ieorge Bane and Nallace Rumple 9 Defendants. : ‘ ‘ ‘ + h 1. Was the Plaintiff's automobile damaged and his person injured by "he ARoli vance of the Defendants as alleced in the pleadines? ANSWER $ Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----~--- MARCH TERM, 195, Wednesday, March 10th, 1954 IN THE FIRST WEEK SUPERIOR COURT -- MARCH TERM, 1954 Thursday, March llth, 1954 2. If so, in what amount was his autmobile damaged? This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on ANSWER? __$750.00 rhursday Morning, March llth, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. Ma 3. If so, what amount is the Plaintiff entitled to recover for the 09 personal injuries which he suffered? 55 ANSWER? _6000.00___ vORTH CAROLINA IN TRE SUPERIOR COURT ata o (See pave 297 for judenent) IREDELL COUNTY Robert Lee Beaver, Plaintiff, No. 555k tan UM Deaewmah and Wallace ee aoe eet Run Defendants. lackwelder, Infant; Rlackwelder * wife }, Blackwelder } cause coming on to be heard and beine heard before ; i A . : 1 A. Rousseau, Judze Presidine and a jury at the s acreed bv both parties that this c mav he tried with nine 7 : , : . 7 ‘ mt h ‘ay ; ; . Superior Court of Iredell Courty iorth Carolina sworn and empanelled as follows: P r . : answered the issues submitted to ther as follows: 1. was the plaintiff's autoronile danazed ar is person neclicence of the defendants as al i in the pleadings‘? Yes. Cc e the Court takes a recess —_ — ss = = so, in what arour } so, what amour (WG € personal injuries which he sufi : - Answer: 26 ,000 .0C ) ‘Ow, therefore, it is ord have and recover of the defendar ts the sur i fifty Dollars (36,750.00) and the costs i = Clerk, This the llth day of March, lo Je A, Nousseau _— . As ne Judce rresiaing | ah No.550¢ Robert Lee Reaver si m ’ vs. te Den , ; worge Game and Wallace Rumple. ; : : Son j f the judgment Jpon the coming in of the verdict and the signing © , . the thereon the defendants in open court except and appeal to the a T a s “uPreme Court of North Carolina. xceptions denied. The defendants (his Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, March llth, (Mh pete 7 7S JUDGE PRESIDING ‘ TT he grounds then moved to set the verdict aside on the third issue on t , 1954 at 9:30 o! a” ; : U ° o'clock Ae We 9 ‘ tn open rourt oive % excessiveness. Motion denied. The defendants “Nn OF The defendants are allowed oan 2 Es not j ‘ i oreee of appeal, Further notice waived. ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- MARCH TERM, 1954 Thursday, March llth, 1954 60 days in which to serve case on appeal, and the plaintiff allowed 20 days to serve countercase or file exceptions. Appeal bond in the amount of $150.00 adjudged sufficient. This Mar. 11, 1954. Rousseau Presiding. INO. 5509 Robert Lee reaver, VSe Seorce Bare and Wallace khunple. Court that Dr. Julian E. was under subpoena and appeared as a witn and was admitted to be an TY Dr. Jacobs be al]owed the sum of ’ J. A. Rousseau Judge Fresiding iE SUPERIOR ville Coca Cola Sottline Co., Defendant : i USE coming on to be heard and being heard at the March of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, «s m tousseau, Judge Presiding, upon an appeal by the defendant herein from an order : , > Q trom an order entered in this cause on the 15th day of February, 194 by V ve Ge Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County; na e o ze . : sthin and also on a motion by the plaintiff for an extension of time within which he the may file his complaint, said motion being directed to Court in its discretion: , ND WHERRAS ; ia AND WHEREAS, aaid appeal from the said order of the resis" ; . jon Superior Court of Iredell County dated February 15, 1954, and the mov ‘ ; ich aforesaid was heard by the Court on the Sth day of March, 1954, "? resen time attorneys of record for both the plaintiff and defendant were P at said hearing and were heard by way of argument regarding same Nn TP | in AND IT appearins to the Court and the Court finding the fact® IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MARCH TERM, 1954 Thursdav, March llth, 1954 regards to this matter to be as follows; from the records of this court > - v ‘ au and the sworn testimony of C. G. Smith and 8B. H. Finch: 1. That summons was issued in this case on the 3rd day of October, 1953, and served on the defendant on the 2nd day of November, 19535 2, That the plaintiff fijed a rotion on the 31st day of October, 1953, Praying that he be permitted to examine the defendant through its officer or agent, James V. Johnson, adversely prior to the filing of his complaint; 3, That an order was entered by the Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County on the 3lst day of Octoher, 1953, allowing the adverse examination as aforesaid, and said exanination was heard on the lkth day ’ of December, 1953, hefore F. G. shamblee, Commissioner; That said Commissioner filed his certified report on the ~* e ‘th day of January, 1954, of saic adverse examination said adverse party was duly sworn and examin . and record as certified was a true record of 5. That on the 26th day of January, 195 defendant tendered to the Clerk of the Superior Court for County an order dismissing this case of record whict signed on the 27th day of January, 1954; 6. That at the time the aforesaid order dismiss: was signed, counsel for the plaintiff had no opportunity to he heard on the notion for dismissal in that no notice of a rotion to dismiss was ever served on the counsel for plaintiff nor on the plaintiff hinself; 7. That neither the plaintiff nor his attorneys wer riven notice, as required by law, and rore particularly G.o. 1 - 568.21, by the Clerk of the Superior Court that the adverse examination aforesaid had been filed of record hy the said Commissioner; T om , c Y ; - ] ®, That on the 15th day of February, 1°54, on motion ol the counsel for phintiff to set aside and vacate the order entered by the said Clerk on the 27th day of January, 1954, dismissing this action, the said Clerk entered an order setting aside and vacating his order of January 27, 1954, and allowed the plaintiff to file his complaint as of even date therewith; whereupon the defendant took exception to the said order dated February L5s 1954, and gave notice of appeal to the Judge of the Superior Court. AND 1T appearing to the vourt and the Court finding as 4 matter of law that the order of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County dated February 15, 1954, was correct and proper the same is now therefore aff; rmad ° o inti he AND THE Court upon motion of the counsel for the plaintiff further llowed ders in its discretion that the plaintiff be and he is hereby 4140 { + _ ~~ l lo 1 Wir 3 . i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- MARCH TERM, 1954 Thursday, March llth, 195, to file his complaint as of evendate herewith, and the defendant is allowed 30 days hereafter within which to denur, answer, or otherwise plead to said complaint. THIS THE 11 day of March, 1954. J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding Statesville Coca Cola Bottling COs the defendant in open court objects and excepts to Findings of c L nr “9 ’ ’ ° and %, and the defendant further objects and open court to all of the findings of fact and to the order lhe defendant in open court objects and excepts to the foregoinz findings of fact therein contained and gives notice of court to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Further LN) jefendant is hereby given 60 days for the purpose of al, and the plaintiff is hereby allowed 30 days nt exceptions to the case on appeal or serving 4 in the sum of $200.00 adjudged sufficient. Je housseau Judge Fresiding. Pe Lyerly & L sore in: a mee Continued bY Tange” es Blankenship, Jr Continued >Y * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK MARCH TERM, 1954 Thursday, March llth, 1954 5591 Henry Carson vs Mary Dalton Carson Continued. No. 5680 Mary Proctor Young vs Fred Grier Young Continued. No. 5532 In Re: Caveat to Will of W Press Sharpe Continued. jNo. 5632 P S West vs W W Cloer Continued. No. 5611 Piedmant Lumber & Mfg Co.vs H B Fortner Continued. No. 5326 Thomas H White vs Herbert I Wooten & Joyce Wooten Continued. No. 5542 Lewis H Winecoff vs Yates S White Continued. No. 5544 TH Davis, Jr vs R W Davis, dr. Continued. y8p 3751 Sam Ostwalt & wife et al vs Gaither Ostwalt et al-Continued. No. 5606 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Lillie Lyon Smith Plaintiff vs M. Cs Smith Defendant This cause coming on to be heard befre his Honor J. A. Rousseau, Judge Presiding at the January Term, 1954, upon restraining order and citation for contempt and the Court having dismissed the restraining order and citation for comtempt and by consent of the parties hereto orders and directs that the R. R. Mayberry Cotton Gin of Iredell County and the Platers Warehouse of Winston-Salem, North Carolina shall pay unto Lillie Lyon Smith one half of the funds now held by said wrehouses derived from the sale of cotton and tobacco and one half of the funds to . C. Smith derived from the sale of cotton and tobacco grown by Lillie Lyon Smith on the lands of M. C. Smith, and that Planters Warehouse and Re Re Mayberry Cotton Gin are hereby authorized, directed and empowered to pay to Lillie Lyon Smith and M. C. Smith one half of the proceeds now in their possession and that this action be dismiss ed at the costs of the Plaintiff, This the 27th dav ff January, 1954. J, A. Rousseau —~TJudge Presiding i By consent: Lillie Smith eC. Smith H.R. Battley, Wm M, Allen ttorneys for Plaintiff Lewis, fe: Se Jf) -tvette, Holshouser & Mitchell Li pif VA tpt Zoe Attorneys for Defendant * JUDGE PRESIDING uy is ae a lad “Vo. 5709 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Paul Marion, Administrator of the Estate of William Gray 4Jarion, Deceased, Plaintiff, JUDGMENT -vVvs- 3. C. Godbey, Defendant. THIS CAUSE COMING ON TO BE HEARD and being heard before The Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff that the plaintiff no longer wishes to prosecute said action and desires to take a nonsuit in the action; IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff be and he is hereby nonsuited and the plaintiff is hereby taxed with the costs. 10 dav of March, 195L. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County CONSENTED TO; Paul Marion Administrator of the Estate of William Gray Marion, Deceased SMATHERS & SHUFORD BY: Earl F. Shuford Attorneys for the Plaintiff eee Ke Ke Ke ke Kk ‘No. 572k NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Southern Piano Company, Inc., Plaintiff — JUDGMENT Mrs. Charles Drumheller, Defendant . the This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before he Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Iredell County Superior Court, upon ¢ plaintiff's motion to be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit of i i in 1¢ appearing to the Court from the statements of the attorneys representiné is be- the plaintiff and the defendant that the matter and things in controversy tween the plaintiff and the defendant have been settled, and it further {ano appearing to the Caurt that this was an action to recover a certain P ’ to vake and that summons was issued, and that an order directing the sheriff de by the clerk, ™ the piano mentioned in the plaintiff's affidavit was made bis action, that the piano was never taken by the sheriff, but that service of sommons was had soon the defendant, and it further appearing to the Court that the matters and things in controversy between the plaintiff and the defendant have been fully pletely settled, but that no property was every taken under the order of .rjgim and Delivery, and it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires ye a voluntary nonsuit of its action; e Lane t is, therefore, considered, ordered, adjudsed and decreed, that the plaintiff be ce ig hereby allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit of this action, and that the cost aig action be taxed against the plaintiff. this 26th day of March, 1954. n . ia Ve Je omith Clerk of the Superior Court i, Hedrick mney for Plaintiff .., lash Pemey for Defendant No. 5708 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY The Auto -Finance Company, -ys- Rebecca Dickens, Defendant This cause coming on to he heard, and being heard, before the Honorable to G. Smith, Clerk of the Iredell County Superior Court, upon the motion of the plaintiff for judgment by default final in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued by the Clerk of the Iredell County Superior Court in the above entitled action on the 13th dav of Februarv. 1954. and that upon said date and at the same time r . BL, : , + . a : on ,g the plaintirr filed in the office of the Clerk of superior Court a verified rn : a . h ; complaint, paying for the immediate poseession of a certain 1942 Ford automobile d i ; ine > Court that an order “@scribed in the complaint, and it further appear ng to the our h anre n , 5 i ing % Claim and Delivery was signed by the Clerk of the Superior Court demandin the immediate delivery of the automobile described in the complaint, and it further appearing to the Court that a copy of the order of claim and —* ‘long with the summons isgued by the Clerk of the Superior Court, and a copy of the verifieg complaint were duJy served by the sheriff of Iredell County upon _ 1954, and it further appearing to 1954, in defendant, upon the 13 day of February, Me Court that the defendant had 30 days from the 13 day of February, he action served upon her, and Mich to answer, demur, or otherwise plead to t t date filed ’ further appearine to the Court that the defendant has not to this any / i * any answer, demurrer, or/other pleading to the cause of action Served apa; Alnst, her, and it further appearing to the Court that the time in which to Plead has expired, and it appearing to the Court from the verified complaint filed in this cause that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for in the complaint; It is, therefore, upon the motion of the plaintiff, considered, ordered, adjudzed, and decreed that the plaintiff have judement against the defendant by default final, and it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be and it is hereby granted the relief prayed for in the complaint, to-wit: that the defendant deliver immediate possession of the automobile described in the complaint to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff is hereby declared to he entitled to the possession of the said automobile, and it is further ordered by the Court that the cost of this action be taxed against the defendant. This 26th day of March, 195k. C. G. Sar ith Clerk of Superior Cour t x wm ke Ke we ek Ke Ke kK kK he ok ‘No. 5671 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY We. R. Holland, Plaintiffs SUMMONS FOR RELIEF Arainst Statesville Developzent Company, a corporation, %. Wallace Hoffmann, Executor of the Estate of Isidore Wallace, Jules L. Kaufman, unmarried, S. Wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffmann, Carrie Hoffman, unmarried, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, and all unknown stockholders of the Statesville Development Co, and all persons who mav have or claim any right, title, interest or estate in the real estate described in the co mplaint, Defendants THE STATE OF North Carolina: TO THE SHERIFF OF IREDELL COUNTY--GREETING: This summons is issued in a civil action and not in a special proceeding YOU ARE HEREBY COMMENDED TO SUMMON Statesville Development Company, 4 corporation, S. Wallace Hoffman, Executor of the Estate of Isidore Wallace, S. Wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffmann, Carrie Hoffman, unmarried, Jules L. Kaufman, unmarried, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman the file defendants ahove named, if to be found within your county, to appear and a written answer to the complaint with the Clerk of the Superior Court ®r in Iredell County at his of #4 ce in the Courthouse in Statesville, N. Coy with e complaint fail thirty davs after date of service of this summons. A Copy of th is hereto attached. Let the said defendants take notice that if they within the to file WRITTEN ANSWER to the said complaint or otherwise plead : relie e time requirec by law, the plaintiff will apply to the court for th d in the complaint. Herein fail not, and of this Summons make demande due return. given under my hand and seal of said court, this 7th day of December, 1953 . 53. orney for Plaintiff: nn na, Dearman & Winberry, Box 72, Statesville, N. C. PROSECUTION BOND FOR COSTS C. Ge. Smith CLERK SUPERIOR COURT. We, and each of us, acknowledge ourselves bound unto the defendants herein named in this action, in the sum of two hundred dollars, to be void, however, if the within named plaintiff shall pav the defendants all such costs as the defendants may recover of the plaintiff in this action. Witness our hands and seals this 7th day of December, 1953. W. Re Holland (SEAL) John L. Milholland (SEAL) Johnn L. Milholland, as surety, swears or affirms that he is a freeholder and a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina, and worth TWO HUNDRED dollars over and above all his debts and liabilities and his homestead and personal property exemptions allowed by law. John L. Milholland (SEAL) Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 7th a on day of December, 1953. Charlie Fay Murdock Notary Public My Comm. Expires: 9-2-55 (NOTARIAL SEAL) CERTIFICATE OF RECEIPT OF Vc NO z SUMMONS BY SHERIFF Received in office of Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, this the 7th day of December, 1953. J. C. Rurple, Sheriff OFFICERS RETURN OF SUMMONS Received December 7th, 1953. Served by delivering a copy of the within Summons, together with a copy of the Complaint to the following named defendants on the dates shown opposite their names: S. Wallace Hoffmann, Executor of the estate of Isidore Wallace on the 7th day of Dec., 1953. S. Wallace Hoffmann on the 7th day of Dec., 1953. Leah S. Hoffmann on the llth day of Dec., 1953. defendants, Statesville Development Company, Carrie Hoffman, Jules L. Kaufman , search and Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, after due diligence, ‘nqQuiry Cannot be found in Iredell County. Thi 18 the 7th day of December, 1953. J. C. Rumple, Sheriff of Iredell County BY: Sue McLean Deputy Sheri! —™~S J. C. Rumple, Sheriff Iredell County By We Cc, Jenkins, Deputy Sheriff NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court kaufman, iS a resident of the City of Cleveland, State of Ohio. IREDELL COUNTY. , WV. Re Holland, , ae That the real estate which is the subject of this action i j i Plaintiff, S situate in the City of Statesville, County of Iredell, State of North Carolina Vs. 4 . COMPLAINT aii. Statesville Development Company, tical a corporation, S. Wallace That the plaintiff upon information and belief alleges that the Hoffmann, Executor of the Estate of Isidore Wallace, S. Wallace tatesville Development Company was organized for the purpose of d tam 4 Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffman, st Purpose of dealing in Carrie Hoffman, unmarried, Jules L. real estate, and that said corporation did for a number of vears ensave in Kaufman, unmarried, Herbert Hoffman z and wife, Babette Hoffman, and all the development of real estate and the sale thereof, and particularly that unknown stockholders of the Statesville Development Company, and all persons said corporation did subdivide into lots a larse area of land in South who may have or claim any right, title, interest or estate in the real estate described in Statesville, and a plat of said land known as the Statesville Development the complaint, ALL OF WHOM ARE ALSO UNKNOWN, Company, showing the suddivision of said land into lots, is recorded in Defendants. Deed Book 15, page 441, Iredell County Rezistry. NOW COMES W. R. Holland, the plaintiff, and for a cause of action alleges _7- and savs: That the land which is the subdject of this action is now owned hy the elie plaintiff, W. R. Holland, in fee simple, having teen conveved to hin That the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, is a resident and citizen of Iredell John L, Milholland, Tax Collector o* the City of Statesville, and is County, North Carolina. particularly described as follows: -2- Lying and being in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, on theEast side of Fifth Street, and particularlv described as follows: That the defendant, Statesville Develpment Company, was a corporation Being all of Lots Nos. 6 and 7 in Flock No. 2, as platted, mapped and shown on the plat of the Statesville Develprent Company, known as the Statesville organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, with Development Company property, and which plat is duly recorded in Deed "ook 15, page L441, Iredell County Registry, and to which plat reference is hereby its principal place of business in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, made for a further and more complete description, and being the identical lots conveyed to W. R. Holland by the deed of John L. Milholland, 742 North Carolina, and the plaintif* is informed and believes that this Collector of the City of Statesville, recorded in Deed Pook 94, paze 373. tredell County Rezistry. qi F 4 He a r f | t , # \ a . i 4 : ‘Be iv 1 A i ; al i ti 4 veh A UR i tm ‘ % i “ 4 | . a} ‘3 i B ity Te él ‘ ' sai ' iy | £. } a i ¢ 4 a} 5 * 4 ’ i , WET a hae t. 6 | é I } } i a i) id be % #- + f 4 o A an | ' 4 ’ | | eee pa I { 4 i | ' ' — F ‘ 7 — we —mn | al 3 a ! 1 — ie } ( } { corporation was dissolved or went out of existence about forty or fifty years 4 =Be Ni aro. That sometime prior to the vear 1991 the Statesville Development iS ajo ; Company was the owner of the lots described in Pararraph 7 of this That Isidore Wallace died on the 10th day of May, 1943, a resident =) complaint, the same having been a part of acreaze tracts that were owned of Iredell County, North Carolina, leaving a last will and testament which as by the Statesville Development Company} that in the vear 120] the Statesville was duly probated and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Superior mm ee i el Development Company had a map made of certain lands owned by it in South rr ate vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, in Will Book 12, pase 201; that 5 s, fas Statesville, which map is recorded in Deed Book 15, page 41, Iredell Walkce Hoffmann dulv qualified pe : ; Wallace, at 2d as Executor under thewill of Isidore . : . " vOunty Rezistry, and the above described lots are shown on said map, and the i) We and iS now ensaged as Execu ‘ ; : e: that S. Wallace nar 52 GEEnengEeS ee Gere alleres that the Statesville Development laintirfe : ‘ ‘ lnre ; 4 citizen Plaintiff upon information and belief Hoffmann, Executor of the estate of Isidore Wallace, is a resident and ©’b Com j "pany was then the owner of said lots in fee simple. o i of Iredell County, North Carolina. -9- 4 } = . . Upon information and belief the plaintiff alleges that in the year re That the defendants, S. Wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffmann, 4 defendants, 1923 the Board of Aldermen of the City of Statesville duly adopted a wid, residents and citizens of Iredell County, North Carolina; that the district on the East side ) ae ‘ sal ordinance, laving out a sidewalk improvement n Paragraph 7 of this complaint were . ; of ‘th Street, and the lots described i the City of Danville, State of Virginia; that the defendant, Jules le dinance or ‘NCluded in said sidewalk improvement district; that under the or East rdinances SO adopted *yv the Cit of Statesville the sidewalk along the Eas Side of nt of and adjacent to said lots Fifth Street, and particularly in fro -1l4- was paved and improved. it. That there is no deed or other instrument of record in or under which the Statesville Development, Company conveyed the lots descrihed Upon information and belief the plaintiff alleges that under the valiq in Paragraph 7 o an erso rs ; ordinance or ordinances adopted by the Board of Aldermen of the City of of this complaint t y Pp nN, ‘irm or corporation, unless the same passed ynder 8 deed executed by the Statesville Development Com Statesville, a lien was assessed on November 1, 1923, in the amount of pany to Isidore Wallace, : OL, acknowled ! mh ' Twenty dollars ($20.00) each against the aforesaid lots, the same being for gated October 19, 1904, nowledzed November 25, 1904, and filed for , ibe 8. 1916, and rae j e R Ch aaa & a the paving and improving of the sidewalk adjacent to and in front of gaiq record December 25, 916, recorded in Deed 00k 54, pase 19, tredeli Ceenty lot Registry, which contained the followinz: ots. ep a“ "The conveyance to Wallace shall include alllands now owned by the Upon information and belief the plaintif’ alleges that the City of Company, and all such as may revert to the Company, or anv richt thereto, hy . : , , : 5 a of any failure whatever in anv former convevance hv the Company Statesville was unable to find a record title owner of said lots, or any one aga . ne onpeny ve ae . gs such lands, the object heing to convey Wallace all such interest d claiming to be the owner of said lots, and made the assessment on said lots, ” : Eo : ' . rights in the Company's lands which have not passed from it, and which may "Owner unknown": that said assessment was in all respects a valid lien on i . . : an ees . ; . ; . revert to it as the Company itself has or would have in the premises", said lots for paving and improving the sidewalk. ' _— o15= -l12- That the plaintiff is informed and helieves, and upon information and Upon information and belief the plaintiff alleges that the assessments ‘ - belief alleres that Isidore Wallace did not at anv time claim to he the hereinbefore described were not paid, whereupon John L. Milholland, Tax s oo : ee owner of the lots described in Pararraph 7 of this complaint, and that he did Collector of the City of Statesville, after advertising the lots described ; i 7 e : : . ; : not convey or attempt to convev said lots to nv person, firm or corporation; that n Pararraph 7 of this complaint, as required by law, sold said lots at public : . the plaintiff further allezes upon information and belief that the devisees under auction for cash to the highest bidder, at the Courthouse door of Iredell P e a ' ¢ the Will of Isidore Wallace do not claim anv right, title, interest or estate County, on Monday, April 5, 1926, at 12 o'clock, Noon, and the plaintiff in the aforesaid lots, and that they have not conveved or attempted to convey the Me ah became the last and hizhest hidder at the price of One Hundred Fifty Dollars aforesaid lots to any person, firm or corporation. ($150.00) each;that the plaintiff paid the purchase money, and John L. p ly ot. Milholland, Tax Collector of the City of Statesville, executed and delivered t Leal * i . : . That Isidore Wallace. the vrantee in the deed referred to in the the plaintiff a deed conveying said lots to the plaintiff in fee simple, , ; Preceding paracraph of this complaint, died testate in Iredell County, North Said deed heine dated July 7, 1926, and filed forrecord on the 8th day of P P ? com? ’ i | ‘arolina, on the 10th day of Mav, 1943, and under his Will Carrie Hoffman, a November, 192%, at 3:20 o'clock, P. M., and duly recorded in Deed Book 9%, o 3 ‘melia Kaufman, S, | Er and Herbert Hoffman were the devisees of paze 373, Iredell County Recistry; that the aforesaid deed is made a part » Se. Wallace Hofman, an e the any real estate he owned at the time of his death: that the devisee, lo" hereof as fully as if copied herein and will be introduced in evidence 4 7 fr . “arrie Hoffman heen made fe ; hi ection; that Amelia Hoffman GPri iit t d ad dant in tnis a 10Nn rial of this cause, . has been ma q e nd ] ’ kK ‘aufman and her husband are hoth dead, andher only heir at law, to-wit her ie «i3- e : . > ] fm Son, Jules L, Kaufman, is a defendant in this action: that Herbert Hoffman J That by deed dated November 7, 1945, filed for record November 10, A a — a — — . he Will of Isidore Wallace, are de- H) dS, Wallace Hoffm vi der t 1945, at 11:40 o'clock, 4. M., and recorded in Deed 300k 172, page 306, ce Hoffmann, devisees under I ; ed *ndants in this action. redell County Rezistry, W. R. Holland and wife, Ethel Holland, convey Vi o}9- pe SS ~~ ' ; ife, Lot No. 7 described in Paragraph 7 of this complaint to W. T. Dixon and W , in possessio” ‘ That the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, is the owner in shed in Paracraph 7 of this complaint under fee simple and ie Lizzie .Dixon; that W. T. Dixon and wi fe, Lizzie Dixon, remained in POssess} the aforesaid lot until September 13, 1952, when by deed they conveyed t?* Sion of the lots descr 1952, the deed from W. T. Dixon and wife, Lizzie Dixon, hereinbefore referred to. ad —————— aforesaid lot to W. R. Holland by deed which is dated September 13, filed for record on the 16th dav of September, 1952, at 11:05 otclock, sa {mple, and That 4a the owner in fee simple, Rs M., and dulv recorded in Deed Book 235. page 489, Tredell County the plaintiff, W. Re Holland, 8 ‘ 4 " Possession of the lots described in Paragraph 7 of this complaint by sf Reristrv; that the aforesaid deeds are made a part hereof as fully 48 and by adverse possession a js causes Wverge Possessj twenty years, copied herein and will he introduced in evidence at the trial of th on for more than un ter color of title for more than seven years. carolina, that summons be had by publication. -19- 2, That summons by publication and notice of ths action be made That the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, has used said lots, returneq the all unknown stockholders of the Statesville Development upon Companv, and same for taxes, and paid the taxes thereon, since the year 1926, with the upon all unknown persons who mirht have or claim any isda exception that W. T. Dixon and wife, Lizzie Dixon, had the use of Lot No. 7, or estate in the land described in this complaint. and returned the same for taxes from 1945 to 1952. 3, That the plaintiff be declared the owner in fre simple of the lots iid described in this complaint. That the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, and W. T. Dixon and wife, Liztie 4. That the defendants and all unknown persons who richt have or clain Dixon, who were the owners of Lot No. 7 from 1945 to 1952, have been in the any interest in the land described in this complaint he rever excluded and open, notorious, hostile, adverse and continuous possession of the lots barred from hereafter claiming any richt, title, interest or estate in the lots vG@s . , ? , . I o e e ‘ Ss described in Paracraph 7 of this complaint, under known and visible lines jescribed in this complaint. and boundaries since 1926, and possessing the same openly, notoriously, con- 5, For the cost of this actin to be taxed in accordance wi tinuously and adversely to the defendants and all other persons, and 6. For such other and further relief to which the plaintiff exercising all of the richts of ownership thereto, and paving the taxes be entitled in the premises, and which the Court ray thereon, for more than seven years under color of title immediately prior to the commencement of this actions; that the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, expressly alleces and pleads that such adverse possession gives him a fee simple title to said lots, and such adverse possession is expressly pleaded the plaintiff in bar of anv claim of ownership bv the defendants or any other person, firm or corporation. Holland, after bein -2i- ntiff in the ahove enti That the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, and W. T. Dixon and wife, complaint and knows the contents thereo ( 7 Lizzie Dixon, the owners Lot No. 7 fror 1945 to 1952, have been in the own knowlede uy except as to thos open, notorious, hostile, adverse and continuous possession of the lots inforration and belief, and as is described in Paragraph 7 this complaint, under known and visible lines iS and boundaries since 1926, and possessing the same openly, notoriously, Suscribed and sworn to hefore me continuously and adversely to the defendants and all other persons, and a . this the 7th dav of Decemrer, exercising all of the richts of ownership thereto and paying the taxes “hayw) 4 v " si ariie Fay “Murdock — thereon, for more than twenty veare iemediately prior to th er —— Nee sae 1952 a) of this action; that the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, expressly alleges and ‘y Commission expires: 9-2-55. aif . P| . 4 {wan se pleads that such adverse possession cives him a fee simple title to said NOTART 4 : :f lots, and such adverse possession is expressly pleaded by the plaintiff a L SEAL) = in bar of any claim of ownership by the defendants or any other person, NORTH CAROLINA #3 5 irm or corporation. “ane, COUNTY. ii : } -22- WR, Holland, , a ibed That the plaintiff is unable to sell or mortaage the lots descr Plaintif a4 My + . a ae in in Paragraph 7 of this complaint because of the cloud on his title, Vs. ville AFFIDAVIT FOR gh eR | PROCESS BY PUBLICATIO! that there is no conveyance in his chain of title from the States patearile iichiiiiis, dieaiiian > Oration, S. W 1 ville “ » 3S. Wallace Hoffmann Development Company and the catch all conveyance from the States secut or pron, |S. Wallace Hoffman sii : d to leaps? 9+ Wallace Hoffmann and wife, relopment, Company to Isidore Wallace hereinbefore referre ° | lot ann, e Hoffmann and . A Jules L, Kaufman, unmarried, ne — lerher¢ . WHEREFORE, the plaintiff pravs the Court: tL ert Hoffman and wife, Rahette Hoffman, and y oe Developrom™ stockholders of the Statesville 7 th tay. pment Company, and all persons who of Nor "SY Or claim any rieht, title, interest or est 4 : ate in the real estate described in the Com ‘ ' Plaint, ALL OF WHOM ARE ALSO UNKNOWN, Defendant S-. 1, That summons he issued for all of the defendants and dul State upon them, and where the defendants are nonresidents of the W. Re Hollmd, after being duly sworn, deposes and says: -l- ehe Statesville Development Company to Isidore Wallace constitutes a That he is the plaintiff in the above entitled action now Pending in the laintiff's title and ownership: that the defendants are cloud on the Pp Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. s to this action: that this is one of the cases in which necessary partie “= service of summons may be made bv publication under the laws of the That summons was issued in the above entitled action on the 7th day of state of North Carolina. December, 1953, by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell] County, North Carolina, for the defendants, Statesville Development Company, Carrie That the Statesville Development Company was a corporation oreanized Hoffman, Jules L. Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, and the and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Carolina, summons has been returned by the Sheriff of Iredell County endorsed as with its principal place of business in the City of Statesville, Iredell follows: "The defendants, Statesville Development Company, Carrie Hoffman, county, North Carolina; that said corporation was dissoived or ceased to Jules L. Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, after due exist about farty or fifty years azo; that the nam ’s of the persons who eet nati diligence, search and inquiry cannot be found in Iredell County." were the stockholders in said corporation are unknown to the plaintiff, and - their places of residence are unknown to the plaintiff, That the defendants, Statesville Development Company, Carrie Hoffman, -6- Reems nem eR aA. oe nee. Jules L. Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hof*man, are non-residents That summons and notice of this action should an publication on the defendants, Statesville Develop» of the State of North Carolina or have departed therefrom and cannot after dus diligence, search and inquirv be found within the State of North Carolina; that Hoffman, Jules L. Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman and the information the plaintiff has, the place of residence and mailing and on the stockholders of the Statesville Dev addresses of the aforesaid defendants 2re as follows: are unknown, and on all unknown persons who I tes ee ee ille Development Company ceased to exist about forty or interest, richt, title or estate in the land and the names of the stockholders are unknown. WHEREFORE, the affiant pravs: Hoffman, a resident of the State of Viraini t l. That an order he made by the Court her address being 268 West Main Street, Danville, Virdnia. action be made on the defendants, Statesvi ’ ’ ~ : ; Yarer e.4 ” . ss Wy f, (3) Jules L. Kaufman, a resident of Cleveland, State of Ohio, and his ‘Ofiman, Jules L. Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman é offman, TAing aUaH address being Mr, Jules L. Kaufman, ‘4ttornev at Law, Union Commercial Bui Cleveland, Ohio. 4) Herbert Hoffman, a resident of the City of Danville, State of Virginia, and his "‘ddress teins 268 West Main Street, Danville, Virginia. (5) Mrs. Bahette Hoffman, a resident of the City of Danville, State Virginia, and her address being 262 West Main Street, Danville, Virginia. = ° 7" ® ‘ t 1 That a cause of action exists acainst the defendants and in favor 0 the plaintiff as follows, to-wit: .This is an action to have the Court ‘ . . a ibe that the plaintiff is the owner in fee simple of the real estate describ the complaint, and which real estate is situate in Iredell County, North Carolinas that the real estate was owned by the Statesville Development nr fro vompany, and there is no conveyance in the plaintiff's chain of title the Statesville Development Company; that the defendants are devisees of Isidore Wallace who held a deed from the Statesville Development Conpene under which the defendants micht attempt to claim ownership: that lac ance from the Statesville Development Company in the plain , ind and the claim that the defendants micht assert by reason of a certa of decree q in uf ' pudlication in some newspaper publish din I 1 County, North Carolina. k of 8 conv?’ pitl? tirf's chain of eed fro 26 That an order he made hv the Court service of summons in this action he made on all unknown stockholders of the Statesville Development ey intoreat vompany and on all unknown persons who have or micht have an h ic . ., the land described in the Complaint in this action. a ed : this the 7th day of December, 1953. “wScribed and sworn to hefore me, “Nis tp 7th day of December, vharlie Fa vy Murdock © Wetasy Pash ———— Public “v Comm ‘ ' -88i0n expires: 9-2-55. NOTARTAL Seay) NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior un IREDELL COUNTY. whe W. Re Holland, That a cause of action exists arainst the defendants and in favor of Plaintiff, the plaintiff as follows, to-wit: .This is an action to have the .Court th laintiff* is the owner ij i Vs. ORDER FOR SERVICE oF PROCESS decree that ep wner in fee simple of the real estate described BY PUBLICATION — ———= Statesville Development Company, ee en ee iter ei eects carolina; that the real estate was owned by the Statesville D ei cle ts Batten, — and there is no conveyance in the plaintiff's chain of title from the et 2. tia Statesville Development Company; that the defendants are devisees of Isdore oe, oot Ts Ce, Wallace who held a deed from the Statesville Development Company under which ain’ area o mat oe tae rie i the defendants might attempt to claim ownership; that lack of a conveyance from title, erest 07 t sh MLL OF eer ine iso UKE, the Statesville Development Company in the plaintiff's chain of title and the claim in the complaint, and which real estate is situate in Iredell County, North ’ . evelopment Company, that the defendants micht assert by reason of a certai eed from the S$ otitis Defendants. n deed from the Statesvill« Development Company to Isidore Wallace constitutes a cloud on t intiree A verified complaint and an affidavit having been duly filed in this eee on Seer action by W. R. Holland, the plaintiff, and it appearing to the satisfaction title and ownership; that the defendants are necessary parties to this action: that =e ee f ¢ > io ~ Yr ft j f C r I j j j ; vi } of the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North this is one of the cases in which service of summons mav he made by publication Pie r ; ee Te ile oa aoe % . ee Ge Sepere ae ~ 7 - ——_ “ . . a - 7 z A a _ —. a ce OO a see Atl PN — nn Jane ical Carolina: under the laws of the State of North Carolina. ole -7- That the Statesville Development Company was a corporation organized That surmons and notice of this action should >@ served and made by under the laws of the State of North Carolina, with its principal place of publication on the defendants, Statesville Development Corpanv, Carrie Hoffma, business in Iredell County, City of Statesville, North Carolina, and Jules L, Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, and on the stock- that it ceased to exist and do business about forty or fifty years ago. holders of the Statesville Development Company whose nares are unknown, and on wie all unknown persons who nicht have or claim anv interest, richt, title or estate That the defendants, Carrie Hoffman, Herbert Hoffman and wife, in the land described in the complaint. Babette Hoffman, are residents of the City of Danville, State of Virginia; IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that service of process in the above entitled that the defendant, Jules L. Kaufman, is a resident of the City of Clevelan¢, action upon the defendants, Statesville Development Company, Carrie Hof*man, State of Ohio. Jules L, Kaufman, Herbert Hceffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, the unknown stock- h ” ; -3- holders of the Statesville Development Corpany, and all unknown persons who ™ m4 i That the summons issued to the Sheriff of Iredell County has been re eht have or claim any richt, title, interest and estate in the land described turned endorsed as follows: "The defendants, Statesville Devdopment Company, ‘n the complaint be made by publication of the notice issued by the undersigned Carrie Hoffman, Jules L. Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, in the Statesville Daily kecord, f r + ; : ." . ’ : £ after due diligence, search and inquiry cannot be found in Iredell County @ newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina, for four successive weeks, as provided by G. S. 1-99.2. -L- That the defendants, Statesville Development Company, Carrie Hoffman, This the 11th day of December, 1953. , +dents : Jules L. Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, are non-residé oe eae Tlerk of Superior court of Iredell County. : dué of the State of North Carolina or have departed therefrom and cannot after CERTIFICATE orth Carolm- diligence, search am inaui " tohe N ’ quiry be found within the State of : C. G. Smit h, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, aSen That the stockholders of the Statesville Development Compan d in the comp ight have hereby certifies that on the llth day of -December, 1953, he mailed by placing ym ) 7 in , , saint! the United States Post Office at Statesville, North Carolina to the following or claim some intere i rest, title or estate in the land describe defendants at the address viwen under the respective names, a letter in which S, : res viven wn ’ — ny are that the names of the stockholders of the Statesville Development Cong" vice of 'e enclosed to each of said defendants a copy of the Notice of Ser unknown. of December, 1953, and a °€88 by Publication issued by him on the 11th dav and that the names and addre COpy of ‘ aba Of the plaintiff's verified Complaint, ~ iS = Wes fa re Ca of the defendants to whom said papers were nailed are as follows: 1. Miss Carrie Hoffman 268 West MainStreet Danville, Virginia Mr. Jules L. Kau*man Attorney at Law Union Commercial Buildne Mr. Herbert Hoffman 262 West Main Street Danville, Virginia Mrs. Rabette Hoffman 268 West Main Street Danville, Virginia That a copy of the letters to the aforesaid defendants is hereto attached That none of the letters to the aforesaid defendants have been returned to the Office of the undersianed Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. This the 6th day of March, 195k. C. G. Smith _ Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. her ll, 1953 Plaintiff velopment Company, Defendants Dear Miss Hoffman: You are a defendant in the ahove entitled action, and I enclose for you a copy of the notice of service of process by publication jssued by me and a copy of the complaint. Very truly yours, C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Iredell County, N. C- December 11, 1953 Mr. Jules L. Kaufman Attorney at Law Union Commercial Building Cleveland, Ohio Res W. R. Holland, Plaintiff vs Statesville Development Company, et al Defendants Dear Sir: ' you You are a defendant in the ahove entitled action, and I enclose sie ed by me and a copy of the notice of service of process by publication issu a copy of the complaint. Very truly yours, C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Iredell County, N. C, Decemher 1] , 1953 7 vr, Herbert Hoffman 268 West Main Street Danville, Virginia Re: W. R. Holland, Plaintiff Vv Ss Statesvill* Developrent Company ’ et al, Defendants Dear Sir: You are a defendant in the above entitled action, and ] enclose for vou a copy of the notice of service of process publication issued by me and a copy of the corplaint. Very truly vours, n a se Je Smith Clerk Superior Iredell County n ,Ourt Mrs. Babette Hoffman 268 West Main Street vanville, Virrinia Res W. R. Holland, Plaintiff VS. Statesville Development Corpany, et al, Defendants Hoffman: defendant in the ahove entitled action, and I enclose copy of the notice of service of process by publication me and a copy of the complaint. Very truly yours, C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Iredell County ee ee we me . : Fe ye Seta 0s sy t ; NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. W. R. Holland, Plaintiff, Vs. aise OF SERVICE oF CESS BY Pup Statesville Development Company, PUPLICATION 2 corporation, S. Wallace Hoffman, Executor of the Estate of Isidore Wallace, S. Wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffman, Carrie Hoffman, unmarried, Jules L. Kaufman, unmarried, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, and all unknown stockholders of the Statesville Development Company, and all persons who may have or claim any right, title, interest or estate in the real estate described in the complaint, ALL OF WHOM ARE 4LSO UNKNOWN, Defendants. __ TO STATESVILLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, CARRIE HOFFMAN, JULES L. KAUFMAN HERBERT HOFFMAN AND WIFE, BABETTE HOFFMAN, ALL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE STATESVILLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, THE NAMES OF WHOM ARE UNKNOWN, AND ALL PERSONS WHO May Hay: OR CLAIM ANY RIGHT, TITLE, INTEREST OR ESTATE IN THE REAL ESTATE DESCRIBED IN 7H: COMPLAINT, ALL OF WHOM ARE ALSO UNKNOWN: TAKE NOTICE THAT: A verified complaint seeking relief aganmst you has been filed in the above entitled action which is now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. The nature of the relief being sought is as follows: The plaintiff, W. R. Holland, seeks to have the Court decree that by virtue of a deed from John L. Milholland, Tax Collector of te City of States ville, adverse possession for more than twenty years, and adverse possession nder color of title for more than seven years, he is the owner in fee simple of Lots Nurbers Six (6) and Seven (7) in Block No. 2 of the subdivision of Statesville Development Companv, as shown by the plat recorded in Deed Book 15, page 441, Iredell County Resistry, said lots being situate on the Kast side of Fifth Street Nareh in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, "or" a : ‘ title, Carolina, and that you and all other persons who might claim any interest, “ right or estate therein be forever excluded and barred. You are required to make defense to such pleading not later than the 10t day of February, 1954, and upon your failure to do so, the party seeking service against you will apply to the Court for the relief soucht. This the llth day of December, 1953. C. G, Smith ———— Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, Statesville, North Carolina. ORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Gourt IREDELL COUNTY. lland WR. Ho : Plaintiff, Ys. Su UELeAS TON OF NOTICE F SERVICE OF PROCESS Statesville Development Company, BY PUBLICATION 7 a corporation, S.Wallace Hoffman, gyecutor of the Estate of Isidore Wallace, S» Wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. offman, Carrie Hofman, unmarried, Jules L, Kaufman, unmarried, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Rabette Hoffman, and all unknown stockholders of the Statesville Development Company, and all persons who may have or claim any rizht, title, interest or estate in the real estate described in the complaint, ALL OF WHOM ARE ALSO UNKNOWN$ Defendants. Q This cause coming on to be heard hy C. % Smith,Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and the Court finds that notice of service of process by publication was issued by the undersiened Clerk of th Superior Court of Iredell County on the llth day o® December, 1953, for the ’ defendants, Statesville Development Company, Carrie Hoffran, Jules L. Kaufman, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, all stockholders of the Statesville Development Company, the names of whom are unknown, and all persons who mav have or claim anv right, title, interest or in the complaint, all of whom are also unknown, from the affidavit of Mrs. C. E. Middlesworth, Statesville Daily Record, Inc., that said noti publication was dulv published in the published in Iredell County, on Decem?: on January 2, January 9, and January 1 1954, and that last publicati thereof was on January 16, 1954; and the Court further finds that the last 7 publication of service of process necessary to completé the pu lication thereof as required 2, 10¢) and that sé ryice of process and ov law, was on Januarv 195L, Summons by publication on the aforesaid defendants was complete on the llth rt f 7 ; 2 o vanuary, 1954, and that the aforesaid defendants were in vou ees action on the llth day of January, 195k. This +he 10 f Tf Os iS the 19th day of Januarv, 195L. GC. Gs Smith a Clerk of Superior Court of — Iredell County, North Carolina. EXPLANATION: Notice of Service of Process was published in the Statesville Daily Record on Saturday, December 32, 1953, Saturday, December 19, 1953, and Since the Paper was not published on Saturday, December 26, and Friday, Pecenber 25, 1953, on account of the Christmas Holidays, the notice was published . the followine week on Saturday, January on T ‘hursday, December 21., 1953, and *he "7 * 2, 195,, r successive weeks, and the day This completed publication for fou period was figured from January 2, 1954. The notice was published by the newspaper on January 9th and January 16, 1954, without any authorization fp OM the Court or the Plaintiff, and was not necessary. This Januarv 19, 1954. C. B. Winberry | Gs Bs Winherry, Attorney for the Plaintiff NORTH C4ROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. March Term 1954 W. R. Holland, Plaintiff, Vs. Statesville Development Company, a corporation, S. Wallace Hoffmann, Executor of the Estate of Isidore Wallace, S. Wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffmann, Carrie Hoffman, unmarried, Jules L. Kaufman, unmarried, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Bahette Hoffran, and all unknown stockholders of the Stockholders of the Statesville Development Company, and all persons who may have or claim any richt, title, interest or estate in the real estate described in the complaint, ALL OF WHOM 4RiE ALSO UNKNOWNS Defendants. Has the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, been in the adverse possession of th lots described in the complaint in this action, under known and visible lines boundaries, adverse to the defendants and all others, for twenty years prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER 2. Has the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, been in the adverse possession uncer color of title of the lots described in the complaint in this action, under known and visible lines and boundaries, adverse to the defendants and all other . : : $ ? persons, for seven years prior to the commencement of this action: ANSWER Yes . i f 3. Does the deed of John L. Milholland, Tax Collector of the City ° . ‘ ; ¢ November Statesville, dated July 7, 1926, filed for record on the 8th day C= r of 1928, and recorded in Deed Book 9), pate 373, in the office of the Registe +} in the Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina, convey the lots described in complaint to the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, in fee simple? ANSWER Yes . rt NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior 00° March Term 195 IREDELL COUNTY. W. R. Holland, Plaintiff, Vs. Statesville Development Company, a corporation, S. Wallace Hoffmann, Executor of the Estate of Isidore Wallace, S. Wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffmann, Carrie Hofman, un- married, Jules L. Kaufman, unmarried, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, and 211 unknown stockholders of the lle Development Company, and os who may have or claim any JUDGMENT a nt, title, interest or estate in eae tes estate described in the ameleint, ALL OF WHOM ARE ALSO UNKNOWN, Defendants. This cause being heard hefore His H nor, J. A. Rousseau, Judce : . s ;f > ’ . : ° e Presiding and Holding the Courts in the Fifteenth Judicial District, and a jury, at the March 1954 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues having heen submitted to and answered by the jury: "), Has the plaintif*, "a Rs Holland, heen in the adverse possession of the lots described in the complaint in this action, under known and visihl: lines and boundaries, adverse to the defendants and all others, for twenty vears prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes __ . 2, Has the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, teen in the adverse possession under color of title of the lots described in the complaint in this action, under known and visible lines and houndaries, adverse to the defendants and all other persons, for seven vears priory to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes. 3. Does the deed of John L. Milholland, Statesville, dated Julv 7, 1924, filed for 1928, and recorded in Deed Rook 9L, par of Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina the complaint to the plaintiff, W. R. Holl ANSWER Yes .” And the Court from the summonses, tt} the complaint, and the evidence offered uke That summons in this action has defendants. ate That the time for answerine expired more than t lavs bef the convening of this Court, and that the time for the defendants to answer or otherwise plead was not extended, and that no answer or other pleading has been filed hy anv of the defendants in this action. ste } s . > we 4 + That this action was at issue for more than ten days prior to the Ct Tr QO5 commencement of this term of Court on the #th day of March, 1954. ole That the deed of John L. Milholland, Tax Collector of tr City of Statesville, dated July 7, 1926, and recorded on the &th day of November, , , 1s 1928, ter of Deeds of in Deed Book 94,paze 373, in the office of the Regis iredell County, North Carolina, conveyed the lots described in the complaint in this action to the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, in fee simple, and that under Sai 6 in fee simple of d deed, the Plaintiff, W. R. Holland, became the owner in the lots degarihed in the complaint. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff, W. R. Holland, is the owner in fee Simple of the lots described in Paragraph 7 of the complaint, and particularly described as follows: Lying and heing in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North Caro): on the East side of Fifth Street, and particularly described as follows: ina, Beine all of Lots Nos. 6 and 7 in Block No. 2, as platted, mapped ang shown on the plat of the Statesville Development Company, known as the Statesville Development Company property, and which plat is duly recorded in Deed Book 15, pave 441, Iredell County Reeistry, and to which plat reference is herebv made for a further and rore complete description, and being the identical lots conveved to W. R. Holland bv the deed of John L, Mil- HOLLAND? Tax Collector of the Citv of Statesville, recorded in Deed Book 91, paz: : Iredell County Resistrv, 2. That the defendants he, and thev are hereby forever excluded and harred from hereafter claiming anv right, title, interest or estate in the lots described in the complaint, and particularly described hereinabove, adverse to the fee simple ownership of the plaintiff, W. R. Holland. 3. That this tudement he docketed, indexed, and recorded on the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and that the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County certify it to the Register of Deeds of Iredell Countv, North Caolina, and that the same be indexed and recorcec in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell] County, North Carolina, anc then returned to the Clerk's office, and the Register of Deeds of Iredell County 's ordered to make a notation on the deed of John L. Milholland, Tax Collector of the City of Statesville, to W. R. Holland, recorded in Deed Sook QL, page 3” referrine to this judement, and the book and pare wherein the same is recorded in her office. L. That the cost of this action he taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. This the 8th dav of March, 1951. 7 J, A, Rousseau Judge Presiding NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk W. RK, Holland, Plaintiff, Ve Statesville Development Company, a corporation, S. Wallace Hoffmann, Executor of the Estate of Isidore Wallace, S. Wallace Hoffmann and wife, Leah S. Hoffman, Carrie Hoffman, unmarried, Jules L. Kaufman, unmarried, Herbert Hoffman and wife, Babette Hoffman, and all unknown stockholders of the States- ville Development Company, and all persons who mav have or claim any right, title, interest or estate in the real estate described in the complaint, all OF WHOM ARE ALSO UNKNOWN, ORDER OF REGISTRATION Defendants. County» I, C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell in the 4 Carolina, do hereby certify that the forezoing Judgment natter is the original Judgment entered in the ahove ent and that the same was signed by J. A, Rousseau, itled action, Judge Presiding at the March Term, 1954, Superior Court of Iredell County, North Capel tne , ’ on the &th day of March, 1954, and that the same is ad‘udced to he in due form and according to law. I do further certify that the foresoine Judgment has heen duly filed in my office, and that the same has been duly recorded in Judement Minute Docket No. 31, page 278. IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered that the forezoing Juderent, andthis certifocate be registered in the office of the Resister of Deeds of Iredell County , North Carolina. Witness my hand and official seal, this the llth day of March, 1951. re_omith Superior Court of Iredel] North Carolina. she she whe she she she soc ah ahs ate she she ak se ate ate ate she ake ale ate ake aie aie No. 5647 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY W. G. Blankenship, Jd Plai vs Sebastian Cansino, Defendant, This cause coming on to he heard, and heinz heard efore the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearine to the Court “rer the statement of McLaughlin and Battlev and Rayrey and Rayrer, Attorneys fa the plaintiff, that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in this action: Te 2 P ai + yiaintiff t and It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plain ea he is hereby nonsuited and is taxed with the costs of said action. This 29th day of March, 1954. nr Ve Ge Smith a “Clerk of Superior Court 8Y consent of: NeLAUGHLIN and BATTLEY RAYMER and RAYMER oy; iW, R, Battle . a Attorneys for the Plaintiff ste He ate se ste ste ste He ste He oe ae ae He a a 2 ae res a ee i TO jNo. 5592 3TATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL 3PENCER HARTSELL and wife, VETA HARTSELL, Plaintiffs, -vVsS- BLYTHE BROTHERS COMPANY, ee ee eee ee ee Defendant. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard hefore the undersioneg Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and It appearine to the Court that the plaintiffs and the defendant have compromised and settled their differences by an azreement whereby the plaintiffs acrees to accept the sur of $250.00 and the defendant agrees to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $250.00 in full compromise, settlement and discharce of all thinzs and matters aleeed in the complant; It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by consent that the plaintiffs have and recover of the defendant the sum of $250.00, and It is FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by consent that the costs this action be taxed azainst the plaintiffs. This the 1 dav of -April, 1954. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court, Iredell County WE CONSENT: Grant S3olmer Attorney for plaintiffs KENNEDY, KENNEDY & HICKMAN BY:_P. D. Kennedy, Jr. Attornevs for defendant We Me He Me Me ae ae we she ale she ae ae ae ae she aie ae ate aXe UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA TATESVILLE CIVIL NO. 217 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ve WILLIAM T. COMER, JR. STELLA M. COMER Route 1 Troutman, North Carolina Oe Oe we we Oe THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard hefore the undersiecned United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, at the regular March term at Statesville, North Carolina, and the same being heard; And it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount praved for in the pleadines filed herein, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff have and recover from the defendant the sur of $526.15, plus interest at the rate of 4% per annum from September 10, 19/8, until this judement is paid; plus the costs of this action to he taxed »>y the Clerk. The Clerk of this Court will certify a transcript of this judgement for docketing in the Office of the Clerk of Superior Court for Iredel] County, North Carolina. This, the 24th day of March, 195k. /s{ Wilson Warlich “7 23- DISTRICT JUDGE. WILSON WARLICK whe she he sie whe whe she whe ale oe ate she se ak UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ue FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE CIVIL NO. 238 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT v. M. L. WEBER Route 5 Statesville, N. C. “se wee w Oe Oe THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before the undersiened United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, at the regular March term at Statesville, North Carolina, and the same being heard; And it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount prayed for in the pleadings filed ROPEES IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintire and the plaintiff's undertaking were served on the defendant by th e » DY the have and recover from the defendant the sum of $249.50, plus interest Sheriff of Iredell County on the 28th day of January , 195k: that y , 19543 that on f 6% from Septembe i Sde at the rate of 6% per annum from ptember 30, 1950, until Paids plus the the 28th day of January, 1954, the Sheriff of Iredell C , “Ge ounty, under the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. writ issued by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Count VY» a tan tte LS a tO te BE Bsoad ff = The Clerk of this Court will certify a transcript of this judgment took from the defendant the automobile hereinabove described: that th ’ > ° ; t e for docketing in the Office of the Clerk of Superior Court for Irede}} defendant failed to give the undertaki > , Ing required by law within three County, North Carolina. days, and the Sheriff of Iredell County turned the above described automobile This, the 24th day of March, 195L. over to the plaintiff; that the above described automobile is now in . 1 Wilson Warlick N WARlick, U. S. the possession of the plaintiff. aie rhe He we we ae ate wert ale Be ae he ae ae ae ae -5- That on the 13th day of February, 1954, the plaintiff filed his dulv et ee See N 4 ifi i j i No. 5695 verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of NORT AL NA S ; yr ; ‘ NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Iredell County, and on the 19th dav of February, 1954, the same was served be RR At - . = ies - alas IREDELL COUNTY. on the defendant by the Sheriff of Iredell County by leaving with the = a . VI H. S. Gilleland, Trading as defendant a copy of the complaint and a copy of the order Hotel Garage, = NE Nees eee nego Plaintiff, - bias : ‘ a That the plaintiff in his verified complaint demands a sum certain im Vs. JUDGMENT FINAL BY DEFAULT money due by the defendant, based on a verbal chattel mortgage on the Mack Frontis, above described automobile and the assignment and delivery of the title Defendant. certificate for said automobile issued bv the State of North Carolina ™ , This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by C. G. Smith, as security for the payment of a sum of Money certain. Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon the oe Clain ana de ] iver Vy pr Océ edir 7s > -he summons , compla int and Ss ,atement 02 That the defendant has not. filed an answer or other pleading in this counsel for the plaintiff, and the Court finds: ACTION, AND THE TIME FOR ANSWERING OR OTHERWISE PLEADING has not been extended, ite and has now expired. That this is a claim and delivery action for the possession of & win . . ; ifi te 1941 Mercury Cawertible automobile, Motor No. 99A-407308, Title certitics : : 1953 That the plaintiff has a valid chattel mortgage and lien on the autor obile issued by the State of North Carolina to Mack Frontis, February l2, , hereinabove described for the sum of money demanded in the complaint by the and being No. W-1094568-E. atte =Qe mm . . unty That this action was commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell C0 That the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant on the on the 25th day of January, 1954, and that upon the affidavit of the and delivery of the title as a verbal chattel mortgage and assignment plaintiff summons was issued for the defendant and a writ issued to - Ce ts (.$61.97), cribed Dollars Ninety-seven n Security, the sum of Sixty-one Sheriff of Iredell County to take possession of the above des together with interest thereon from September 26, 1953, until paid, @ automobile. the rate of six per cent per annum, and the cost of this action. ajo That the time for the plaintiff to file his complaint was extended * -10- Feb 13 That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff on the verbal chattel ebruary 195k. ’ mortgage described in the complaint in the sum of Sixty-one Dollars -l- N4 from esye compla’™ Mv-seven Cents (#461.97), together with interest thereon hat the summons, application Sor extens‘on o* **me *O Ate f's af fide’ and the order extending the time to file complaint, the plaintif if 0) py. ng Z- ' ~~ Tew he i = ranean ze rect ~ seer ere er re ee A ne ee ah a me a a ,— eS be. ee - : September 26, 1953, until paid, at the rate of six per cent per annum, stte That the plaintiff is entitled to the possession of the automobile hereinabove described in order that the same may be sold to Satisfy the indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff, which the Court finds is secured by a verbal chattel mortgage and the assignment and delivery of the certificate of title for said automobile. IT IS, THEREFORE, upon movion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Sixty-one Dollars Ninetv-seven Cents ($61.97), together with interest thereon from September 26, 1953, until paid, at the rate of six per cent per annum. 2. That the aforesaid indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff was secured by a verbal chattel mortgage and the assignment and delivery of the certificate of title on and to the following described automobile: 1941 Mercury Convertible automobile, Motor No. 99a-407308, Title certificate issued by the State of North Carolina to Mack Frontis, February 12, 1953, and being No. W-l09468-E. 3. That the verbal chattel mortgage on the above described automobile and the asdgnment and delivery of the certificate of title to said automobile are a valid lien on said automobile, and the plaintiff has 4 lien on said automobile for the indebtedness hereinabove described. Lh. .That the plaintiff is the owner of the above described automobile, and entitled to the possession of the same to the end that it may be sold and the proceeds applied on the payment of the forego-n money judgment and as otherwise hereinafter directed. 5. That C. B. Winberry, be, and he is hereby appointed as Commissioné? to sell the above described automobile at public auction, to the highest bidder, at the Courthouse door of [redell County on Friday, the 16h day of April, 1954, at 12 o'clock, Noon, after first advertising the same wal ten days by posting a notice of the sale at the Courthouse door of f, *n Iredell County and a notice in the place of business of the plaintif the the City of Statesville, North Carolina, and a notice of said sale on f business automobile hereinabove described, which is stored in the place 0 of the plaintiff. ant if 6. That a copy of the notice of sale be served on the defend wit he can be found in Iredell County by the Sheriff of Iredell County, sail service to be at any time prior to the time of sale. 7, That if the last and highest bidder at the sale of the automobile hereinabove described shallfail to pay the purchase price immediately to the Commissioner, the Commissioner is aithorized, empowered and directed to again offer said automobile at public auction for cash to the highest bidder, at the same place where the first sale is held. g, That the plaintiff shall have the right to bid on the above described automobile at the sale thereof, and to become the purchaser thereof if he should be the last and highest bidder at said sale. 9, That C. B. Winberry, Commissioner, after first paying the cost of the sale, including the commissions of the Commissioner, the cost of this action, and the storage fees on said automobile, shall apply a sufficient amount of the remainder of the sale price to the payment d the foregoing money judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and if there be anv balance remaining, shall pay the same to the Clerk of this Court for disbursement. to the defendant or whoever else may be entitled to the same. 10. That upon payment of the purchase price by the last and highest bidder, C. B. Winberry, Commissioner, is authorized, empowered and directed to execute a bill of sale conveving the above described automobile to saic purchaser, his heirs and assigns. This the 3rd day of April, 1954. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell Countv, North Carolina. | No.5642 NORTH CAROLINA N THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY David Little and wife, Rubv Little Plaintiffs. vs T. E, Deal and wife, Hattie M. Deal Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Carl G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the court from statements of counsel for the plaintiffs and for the defendants that the plaintiffs .» Grie and the defendants have agreed that R. B. Kestler, Jr- and L. 5. Gries i true Surveyors, should jointly survey the said land and establish the tru greement a Stvidine line between the parties, and that pursuant to this - =e “= “ - 2 ~- 2 = ee ae ateeee ne a ——<= — = . Bi i ah Aandi - eee gg = = the said R. B. Kestler, Jr. and L. B. Grier, Surveyors, did meet On the $ f . : land on March 5, 1954, and established the following line between the parties; Beginning at an iron pin on the western boundary line of the etd dines the said pin being North 4 deg. 9 min. East 1, 094 feet from a stump, the southwest corner of the David Little and wife, Ruby Little tract of land, and being South 4 deg. and 9 min. West 1,094 feet from an oak, the northwest corner of the T. E. Deal am wife, Hattie M. Deal tract; thence South 87 deg. 11 min. East 2,873 feet to an iron pin in the eastern boundary line of the two said tracts of land, said iron pin being 1,094 feet from an iron oin, the southeast corner of the David Little and wife, Ruby Little tract, and being 1,094 feet from the northeast corner of the T. E. Deal and wife, Hattie M. Deal tract. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the true dividing line between the plaintiffs and the defendants shall be the line that is des- cribed above, and there is attached to this judgment a plat of the survey made hy R. B. Kestler, Jr., and L. B. Grier, Surveyors, showing the said line, which plat is made a part of this judgment to the same extent as if copied therein in fulls and it is further ordered that a copy of this judgment and a cooy of the plat be recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the cost of recording the same be made a vart of the courtcosts. It is further ordered that the costs in this action he taxed one-half to the plaintiffs and one-half to the defendants, and that the costs shall include twenty-four and 65/100 ($24.65) Dollars for the surveyors, R. B. Kestler, Jr. and L. B. Grier, for their services in making the survey and plat. This the 23 day of March, 195k. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court D 3y Consent: Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward Attorneys for the Plaintiffs J. G. Lewis Attorney for the Defendants He Xe whe ae ae ae aie ie ie Beate aie ac ah ie aie eae ‘. 5717 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court Before the Clerk Dixie Radio Supply, Inc.,_ a Couth Carolina corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. Harold W. Morrow and Forest W. Morrow, a partnership, trading and doing business as M & M Appliance and Furniture Company, Defendants. | This cause coming on to be heard, and bheine heard, hefore the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 5th day of April, 1954, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winherry, Attorneys, for the plaintiff, for judgement by default final, and it appearing to the Court: ole That on March 3rd, 1954, the plaintiff filed a dulv ‘lerk of the in the above entitled action, with the Iredell County. That summons was issued Sheriff of Iredell County, and itn . vw ne ke 4 5 ec That the summons was served on the defendants hy Marshall Maness, . ° us Lo > a4 t+ +h Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on March 6th, 195k, leaving with the ‘+ rer t he vr) , a defendants a copy of the summons, together with a copy o” th complain ake + q th That the time for the defendants to answer was not extended, and the ; . e g no time allowed by law for the defendants to answer has now elapsed, and n ‘ 4 hy tf . answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been f led by the defendants «Se ; i plaintiff demands a sur That the verified complaint filed by the plain I a the fendants certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the de certain sum under the contract and agreement of the defendants to pay 4 certain Myhihbit A", was therefor: that an itemized verified statement, marked Exhi ’ P ' t set forth attached to, and made a part of the complaint, which statemen , ice to be the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the pr i f the Paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out © transaction. un ep tnn ee eo ee shi That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that the defendants are now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement marked "Exhiit A", the iw Seven Hundred Fifty-One Dollars and Seventy-Nine Cents ($751.79), together oe interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 19th day of Oetober, 1953, until paid. Iv IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECRZED That the plaintiff recover of the defendants, Harold W. Morrow and Forest W. Morrow, a partnership, trading and doing business as M & M Appliance and Furniture Company, the sum of Seven Hundred Fifty-One Dollars and Seventv-Nine Cents ($751.79), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from Octoher 1°, 1953, until paid, together with costs of this action taxes by the Court. This the 5th dav of s . ADr C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court County. t ste she ate she kk ste aie vc te she she ake sic akc ote ate afk she aie ate aie In the Suverior Court canse coring on to be heard, and being heard by C. G. Smith, Clerk uperior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing ” from counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for the defendant that the Sdlaint toe and defendant have reached an agreerent in regard +o the motion filed hy the plaintifé the motion filed by the defendant, and the , filing of arended Dleadines. aT TLODD = po 4 am L Is, HEREFOR tt hy and with the consent of Adars, Dearman and Winberry, and J, Lewis, Attorneys for the plaintiff, and Baxter H. Finch, Ne I. Ward, Jr., and R. A. Hedrick, Attornevs for the defendant, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff's motion for ‘udement by default and inquiry, fs haw ,t iled on March 10, 1954, he, and the same is hereby dismissed. ’ ‘ ; \ 2, That the defendant's motion, filed on the 2ith day of leven. so be allowed to amend the verification to his answer, filed in on February 18, 1954, be, and the same is herehy dism} 3. That the plaintiff is hereby allowed +o file an amended this action, and he is allowed thirty days after the date of thie which to file said amended complaint, together with one cosy jefendant’'s attorneys, in the office of the Clerk 0° the Sup Iredell County, North Carolina. L. That the defendant be, and he is herehy allowed thi the filing of the plaintiff's amended complaint to fi gnended answer thereto, demurrer or otherwise p] copy thereof for the plaintiff's attorneys, in the Syperior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. This the 5th day of April, 195L. consented +o: nar ADAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERRY ov ry R : 18 ve Be Winberry Verher of Birr ae T 24 ve Ve LEW!S ga A ° ve Je Lewis attorneys for the Saxter H, RPinnh raxter } e ; + "ner Defendant 324 1No. 5706 North Carolina ; In the Superior Court o ue Tredell County Yorth Carolina In the Superior Court Ty 1 County Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, Iredel Plaintiff Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, — JUDGMENT Plaintiff Peter A. Ferrucci and wife, Madeline M. Ferrucci, Defendants -VS- j, K, Sprinkle and wife, | oguline Sprinkle, This cause coming on +o be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, ie. Ve Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion bv the plaintif¢ This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, for judgement against the defendants, Peter A. Ferrucci and wife, Madeline ‘lerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff ai i Ferrucci, bv default final; ‘or judgment against the defendants, W. K. Sprinkle and wi Pauline And it appearing to the court that aMerified complaint was filed and jorinkle, by default final; in this action on the llth day of February, 19543 And it appearing to the court that aferified complaint was filed and further appearing to the court that said summons together with summons issued in this action on the h dav February, 1951 int were served on defendants Peter A. Ferrucci and wife, And it further appearing to the cour at said summons the 3rd dav of March, 19543 a copy of said complaint was served on defendant the court that no answer, demurrer, or other February llth, 1954, and on defendant Pauline defendants and no extension of time to file 19 has been granted and that the time within which pleadi may be filed it further appearing to the Cov heen filed by the defendants to the court from the verified complaint that the oleadings has heen granted and that the time the breach of an express contract to pay a Sum ‘iled has exnired; the contract, namely the sum o* Four Hundred Seventy Five & id it further appearing to the court from the veri 7”. Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six percent from ‘ne cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a ! 7 of pp po a ie he : waliod ‘aid. and which sum is evidenced by a note made by ¢ money fixed by the contract, namely the sum of Sight ‘undred 4 10/1¢ = r a2 ¢ ; 220 An : * 4 ’ rront froar and wife, Madeline M. Ferrucci to Peoples Loan and Savings 00.00) Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six percen rer Ke Natal o . ° ce "nnato “tober 12, 1953 until paid, and which sum is evidenced hy a note made Sere sr are ee ° -_—_— a > : ‘ . n ; riff prin rn wif t : . : - > Yr aq Savi cS R rf REFORE® it is ordered, adiudged and decreed that the plaintii? nkle and wife, Pauline Sprinkle to Peoples Loan and savings ank; ‘ i i NOW. THERERPOR Ee se : ' wu ¢ he plaintiff have and recover of the defendants Peter A. Ferrucci and wife, Madeline Me NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed hat the plainti L WD . RS ith a . : £ Pay j Y ink Ferrucci the sum of FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE & NO/100 ($475.00) DOLLARS, ¥° ave and recover of the defendants W. K. Sprinkle and wife, Pauline Sprinkle sum of : ® ‘ y 1" LITTAINNh © ° ° ‘ An uri + in res t >Y° n f m interest thereon from September 11, 1953, and the costs of this action. SIGHT HUNDRED AND NO/100 ($800.00) Dollars, with interest thereon ‘ro This the 9th day of April, 1954. oe 53, and the costs of this action. a ee Thi ’ 4 i C. G. Smith . Court 9th day of April, 1954. Clerk of the Superior Cour smi Ce G. Smith : ’ eg eae Clerk of the Superior Court a ttorneys for Plaintiff, Statesville, North Carolina. Scott, C0174 - Attorn vOllier & Nash ‘“Orneys ¢ t . ‘or Plaintiff, tategy: we Se se Se He ste ete ae ste ste se ae ae oe Sville, North Carolina. she Se ste se se oe se ae ae te ae ae a Ha MNO. 5020 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | ho, 5554 coat CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ’ IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Pr ITY. MARCH 195, TERM Vanee McBride 1RBDELL COUNTY ARCH 1954 TERM. Lona M. Overcash Mrse VSe “~. JUDGMENT veal Blackwelder, Infant; and yD. Blackwelder and wife, leg, Ne Ds Blackwelder Villiam M. Herrin Mrs. Defendant ™y 4 se comng on to be heard before His Honor, J. A. Rosseau. Jd) This cause coming o t he heard a hej f — it ere ae ee ees © dge his cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Presiding, at the March Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and mith. Clerk of Superior Court f Tredell Co: 1 i Press 0sine » sr Smith, Clerk of Superior Court © redell County, North Carolina ; sopearing to te Court that all parties in this cause have agreed to compromise appearing to the court from the statements of counsel for the plai " | ; and settle all matters in controversy between the parties upon the following a+ at the matters and things in controversy hetween the rerms and conditions: that the defendants have agreed toray to ed and that the plaintiff has agreed to take a non-suit ‘ the sum of $2000.00 in settlement of the plaintiff's personal "he defendant has agreed to take a non-suit as to the defendants have agreed to pay the his counterclaim, and beth counsel have agreed to having judement of non-suit within Sixtv davs after this date and have agreed tc in this action: that the cross-action of the de*endant, is hrebv ordered, ad judged, and decreed that the plaintif? hy and through N. D. Blackwelder, hi july appointed euardia cause of action and that the defendant he non-suited as tc judged herein that the defendant, Nea lackwelder, costs of court are taxed equally against the plaintiff nave and recover nothing bv or or , rlaintiff in this cause. y a ee Now, therefore, by consent nm nr ‘ . CG. Ge Smith / Clerk of Superior Court the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants onsented +o: Dersonal inivries and in fy1)] settlement 0 a1] matters Sw controversy } =) Land, Sowers & .Avery set forth in plaintiff" s comolaint; that the defendant Neal Blackwelder, Attorneys for the Plaintiff by . , ty # 3 : : e aAtstnn arainst : ufant, have and recover nothing by reason of his cross-action aza nst the fitchell v ee, ee Ry aladé : » — a nT Ri) - Lwold . for the Defendant laintiff it heing for the best interests of the said infant, leal Rlackwelcer, thes & a . * 2.2.9 D4. _ , nr ; fant have “at N. D. Blackwelder, guardian ad litem, of Neal lackwelder, infant, nav , : we — +*- and recover nothine from the plaintif? arising out of the said cross-actior enn : . ar 5 5 l . a? . . . ‘ ; . ; : f a} es ; ckwelder aganst the plaintiff, it being for the best interests © he said al 51a ’ nhante « s ‘ a a wk agai + the ‘Mant; that the costs of this action be taxed by the Clerk agains Worcs } Asaf . . : jefendants eendants; execution to issue Sixty days after this date if the defendan fas ai} Gli ¢ a y : : : -O comply with this judgment. ize ) this the llth dav of March, 195k J. A. Rousseau Judge Presiding TardTeitckwelder McLaughlin & + gd Infane 20 litem of N B lder Ww. R. Battley ‘nfant of Neal Blackwe , LS neve For Defendant “D. Blackwelder Mrs. Lona M. Overcash oe Plaintiff lrg ~ Ng D, R e Tefendanrg oe ewelder Hugh G Mitchel] Burke and Burke sie “ietornevs for Plaintiff she se se te se He ee a He EM . ‘No. 5716 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL C OUNTY Raymond A. Smith, Plaintiff ! vs ! JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INoUTRy Hezekiah Ramsey i ss Defendant ' THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard am being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, vpon rotion by the plaintiff, t hrough his attorney of record, for judgment against the defendant by default and inquiry; AND IT appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 2nd day of March, 1954; AND IT further appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that said summons, together with a copy of said Complaint were served on the defendant on the 8th day of March, 1954; AND 11 further appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to fi.e pleadi:,: ‘as been asked for or granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; IT IS, THERSFORE, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff lave anl recover judgment of and against the defendant for such damages as a jury may award, and that inquiry of the amount of such damages be executed at the next Civil Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Cirolina, before’ jury to determine the amount of said damages. This the 15 day of April, 1954. C.G. Smith 2 — Clerk of Superior vourt mu we he mh mh me me ee Om kk em Mo. 5668 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERION COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Town of Mooresville VS. | | Ww. M, Malcolm and wife, ' Mrs. W. M. Malcolm This cause coming on to be heard upon the report of R. H, Peck, Commissioner for the Sale of real estate described in the petition in the cause, and it appearing that the sale was conducted on March 15, 1954 at 12 o'clock Noon at the Court House door in Statesville, North Carolina, that at the said saye C. L. Edmiston became the last and hirhest bidder for the sum of $225.00 cash, that the report of the sale was duly filed in the office of the Clerk of Superior C ourt of Iredell County, North Carolina on April 1, 1954; that no advance bid has been filed, and that more than ten days have elapsed since the filing of said report; and it appearing that the price bid is a fair and a reasonable one. It is therefore ordered and adjudred that the said R. H. Peck, Commissioner as aforesaid, be, and he is hereby, authorized and empowered to convey to C. L. Edmiston, his heirs and assirns, the real estate described in said petition upon the payment of the purchase price and every part thereof. That out of the purchase price tiiat he pay to the Town of Mooresville the amount of its ju gment against W. M. Malcolm and wife, Mrs. W. M. Malcolm, the cost of this action, and apply any balance that might remain toward the payment of outstanding taxes, and this cause is reta ned for further orders. This the 15th day of April, 195k. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court ee ee ant) j f ‘ a wS "lds AROLINA 7 Vv UNTY CO aett “et bee ‘ichelson, Ne ’ ‘ "TeSS Plain ) 4 VSe Minor, wed ronre se ca — *he stareren’ wo “axed ‘| sce i | = A Pie or * Te ~~ > a = = —_ = < Vo) Jes aa a) a A °¢ 7 \ ( art lowed a Ananw hor over [kh aa avrenral give ithout honds AVC artey n the possession of the ’ i 4 4 arcreed has That the defendant ey on the note and chattel mortgage saeco the above described versonal pron "ae +hayranft foe sim ala be the : an » ar Jue rope + f he the Clerk o: ‘ :ef 3 i” 4 no that the Sher se] ] convey ™ , ‘ iy advertiser Aivert aaariheé hereinabove d from the defendants propert shall have took nty that the defendant, the above descrihed$ ' abo eA inn a’ and at the time of the se?! ve described personal wo Sh sal] have assigns hond, LiStratore »sUrators or Cc} waiting the three day nN ‘ -yrned that the Sheriff of Iredell County . : rg onal of over to the vlainti®®, and sa d pet propertv or s hy 4 Ffurt her in the proceeds no claim, action or cause of action against of the aforementioned reason aim and delivery action and/or this interest fror the plaintiff i \+ now ‘udeament. the sale , e the Qe “¥ fy i defendant in consideration of her releasin interest and estate in the ahove described ‘om the sale thereof, be, and she is hereby » indebtedness hereinbefore cart forth. lattel rorgage hereinabove referred to money jJudement is te be entered against ers and things arisine between the ba ‘oceeds from the sale thereof are hereby gz to bersonal] di Scharzed t lefend: he defendant + : he Plaintity 2, Property rs 44 na mo p ‘TOm the vat CAROLINA NT 2S) SLL COUN: ] > 2 ° to ss §€ 3 e L oe aquipment partnershi: business e of Piedmont squipmen -gtesville, Ne Ves Company, ~ m + Se NE ee Re ee ee ee Re , rene ver the defendant turned o . fnetriument the aforement instrumen olaint i Ets me shad. and that the plaint ¢ noe described, and ae al . sees Lt ° ana gs a claim and delivery action and was instituted ip the said rules as it ‘ ~ ~~ " a\> t 7 ‘me sai j prot er" Iredell County hefore the pLerk, on the 14th dav of Apri] “— »908@ of sell ing sal 9 47348 ‘ “9 £ ) ~ + $ 5 } 2 fF 1 Connty ar : iy isidera Or i} to the Sheriff of Rowan County where the defendant resijn . eee ; . ' Ss @he Aue Fn ry py 14 : rin + > + ylae r S : ( Q Own From | in the two mules and two hogs Lies ff 1. , Pr ¢ swe ’ , saner Oo Owan LVOuNtVv Seized the . . + . > |" s return that the two hogs were na that +} ee le fendant Us ( i fon i = - iM .\ a ee descr! entitled to the property to jes nereto, the rreomer € , bh d +wO mules F machinery an 9 c > : ee 2 4 £ c ss - oO £ Y s | C ‘ r= + z Y 4 4 4 oO > * . + G. » t oO = Ft - £ © c € + 3 oO oc & & 4 4 5 Cc v } a + s ; € j » ‘ 4 ° a= rt Tr “r + 4 oO > i : = oO é 5 oO oS O - Oo f S = °o 3 + 6 eo oO ) > °r < ¢ oO O oO ¢ t °o co Gw. > ; a ‘ pase i . ; . © oH © Q o ” oO ? w t 2 - “ = ‘ ) = cS ar no t. £ — < . me wn c ; " “" = 5 <x = a - 3 oO < RQ. c ‘ . ‘ 3 + £ f 3 C : = ££ ¢ CSC ea & ‘ Ry £ > ‘ i oo ve) : = = _ ° 3) © S. + + 1 - § c ; c - : a s. o 4 4 @ wo ‘ — @ i) 3 @ co 1 a $ cS ° : <| ° - 5 o =a x Oo © 4 = co wn oo t tb > rd ry S r - o oO c 4 7 = > a =] co on ors = oO 2 wo o ) wo > ‘ € ° - : > = < : =< n S — re > ’ = n : o & oo <> a Oo t % oH ow ' - i - uo = ; c a a = a os e - < - ; : , > on 4 oi << + > | e > ; . i : i > cA - : . > ' - ‘ Qo S. 7 ‘ a & & E+ Ss > © a gxs a ow a % + mS Q. e S. @ S. a ss <a , © + @ Oo = & + c+ & a wo + w aA Oo ka TO 7 +>} S. rod » = t °r | C xy a © om ° t}- tr G, G & t wT | ‘ oO a & os $ c C a ayy xX s c € cc} —_— cr} G ¢ a . . ba fo o ¢ WO | * 5 e ‘ lo % ¢ . & | e Tb % + ; ;— hina C . ” 4 | 5 fron > 4 @ r . a 3 Oo @ S S. ro > € C : fs oO T wT P= 4 3 < $ + 2 | : 0 s: oo v o q c S ¢ ‘r) < mt S$, oO a oS 4 C @® wo _ . 4 Tw a C a s $ c oO rT oO oO “ $ Gq ¢ S S. s a S$, os l Sa F Le "§ — . . © . . A. . c SS <S ee ’ - rs . V ¢ “ ~_ a oc pan . * Oo <e e e ce e eo . T et -_ Tt ~ a $4 e i hes oO . n + ‘ . ~~ e * + . os : o a . - » 6 | 4 © . an - : = Y . s : ~ 9) ° > DO + S s SS © > o $ Oo > = o » ws = + wo < mc “4 7 . 7 . e eo a 4 oy oO 2, = ~” <= + = . 4 = & tr. wo — no £ Oo o o i “3 ws < A <> 3 . es = + c 3S ; oS 07 E So — ie 4 , > a . ¢ ; 7 ot r +> ; = a : > = b — 3 \ t \ oo a «= oO ° a - - s ‘ a a < + -*? cs > = ~ i. cs 3 ° v - 4 r 3 ow = u = <= $2. 4 ° + ~ cs ° ° °o Q + 2. ° c Le - » <= c wo ° rs - c - 4 WM) a> : 3 or ¢ ” ° © £ c ie » b no ow oO oO 2 S Simi - P=; Ps . t ° ° > s o . £ = - . c oO - rm = oO £ C : = —_ woe at ou a+ ( s h, 2 29) e , e . a oO Vv 5 | i ‘ ~ > + a o —“ » Tc | ss bay . © , } = € ‘ C C ‘ a oe | 9S = . 4 _ ». . » > ‘ * — + t “ gg a ; . = : o c - : ‘i : 2 = + C : ‘ é' os ‘ ¢ Yu | v . : o Q. ‘ £ ‘ = = oO fs o a - O a - c . 4 4 ; - ; — ‘ - — ~~ Oo c; £ S & i pam > 2 £ + C 4 . em - { oO 19) o 3 ‘ c oO C oO c Y % WO + n - t O x — rt ¢ oa Se a Tt ¢. © C - ~ an . - < . ‘ > YY $ 2. ° aa i. o O . ‘ b + ‘ whed ~~ ‘ rp + ' “s + see c Cos & & wo = r- oO . c eau gC) c & oO C C c.. O - - w) © ra f T » atu € 5 “~ : 3 oO C o . £ 6 c no ridually 1d AY Oo i ehalf stock | 7} -_ Ss eo: % 4 - » wo coe rx sal m= Ff ‘ ~ . oh + O © ran see e c - = C O > i, o na ) Caroli ount any , ’ , 1d an € Nortn COURT ’ Vv SS Ss >) 7 il > > tH t a < x4 ot wn mr ad +a e« > aq Q tx TAA oJ ‘ ’ “io ro <A A ee ee pause cor This 3 s a oon) > - oe rs) sa ro on Superior om Or ,0urt — a ee ee ee ee ee ba. 1g! , t on Oo c 4 4 c . ye C Wy + a : c ° | oo © < a es S + n oO j- b el. —s > © >. Zi ~ i" © + + oo T a ¢ ‘ + oO e ~F c- 4 wo * >. Sn oO °r t C cs} & . © © cS + 7} O j , G 4 co s 2 ° = > - = - ; = — ‘| oS a ‘ 3 72 —_ e = s < i: 5 8 ‘ ; e ‘ wo ; {* a s ¢ 4 wo 4 is + -~ t 2 oO i< ; c ok oO 2 - wo } 4 £ wo £ + ‘ C + °o o + c © e ‘ é 3 ‘ 2) > + wo c ct ‘ «| } count 4 » £ wo ¢ & C Y G 4 5 . ‘ oO i s ‘ w p AG + cs 3 + x 4 Oo ‘ . > + ~ rm = yn St + s) " wo ° ‘ wo hea - > + © n " e +9) U : me ; & ~ os oO G wo = oT ' ‘ 4 4 © oO Oo oO : - a . e 4 GC cS + vc € wm cS o ° O . ¢ e O c ‘ x c O o > AATINGT VY Uivi ¢ CAROLINA acTyTy "sybbe U SS <a e e + a o & ro ~ e 4) a os cS Dyer or vy 7 — ' ~ Se no c > Oo ' wn G t 4 a ol oO aot = > «<a wm IDG >< oe ee a heard ro: vupe 0 “1 r = oT y ‘op oe >a : ee ee = a na : ee pee J a ne - Sa nihenane deemed w ot. he oO? Octo’ fron mith or Ce je ¥ ark Super! eee 5 sd ~ SS <A a ae oe -~ ca x ‘ ce “ — + a + oS 4 on ee G rity TS La Sa' “1 CAROLINA COUNTY Loan apa S <A A ee ee - . a ox Oo 4 on i. i. . © T ° ome + — 2» Lo < ) - . $ . o- c ~ , ¢ > ‘ O i ‘ . O t > > ‘e cS f ¢ - ? wo cs ‘ ort $ rs : = -— S oO s e = . ¢ 2 © ” > £ oO ~- oo. i) & © “r4) > Oo \c Cc . 5 ‘ Cc . oT hae 4 oa } *) - . - ‘ . rs G 1 r i ‘ “9 i “ee | ix ~ << i} C © ‘ } - f © ¢ + - r - 7 aA + 6 ox J e . > ‘ c be Vv r ? — ~~ = _= ~ - - - _——- r - - , = Se ~ ee a i ae ee < 2 a ae - ~ = - od = - _— ae a ; S SS ear , a ~- ee : = . s —-- = s--s —* == -< t - . ‘. “= : = ee poms ra as - ~ - a “ —— OCS... = : a - ——= ~ = = > fails and called - & o = € + @- -) tc o or i i ' ' 3 = Hi f+ i ) + «gl ur oO et = @ Ss © fe = oO Ti es tt. - c oi a AY Vv i I MA om = 4 QO, § = - ow § 1 fi 8 i Ne m 4 4 hy is) \ IN v S 2 FIR Monday, » :) ’ Uil LIAN a ( " VY ( rer order ” 4 oO << ae > oe rn YU C ‘ a am | ON et wo cq < n wr $. A - £ Re at rn rma vw —~ ¢ ry Se <f ¢ © & < | 7% +). on) ae, Sas ~r Sees _ a - t , . . *“-. « ! . . s ( . 4 ' . t C + ‘ } t vc + ’ - 4 Io . > cs j a ‘ aa » 4 ? c ‘ b. £ ** 4 & ab YU s + ° t c a> ¢ e r >< <-=< ee eee ee NS Ee A TS I CS Oe a ee a Oo C © ‘ } - $ & $ ( oO ~ a - G - ‘ ¢ « ° ° f ri ° £ . wt “ C — ~ > o ? us cv o rod v "s ae c a $ C a ' x ’ ' ' o a i+ ++ ‘ 7 se = on ' ' < ~ @ *- + . --s ’ - ’ - S “* : a) : ‘ cs 4 @ ‘ t M &. t °o . oO c « 4 1 = 4 am mt f 3 ¢€ 4 Us 6a © ] > Y - c i wo , ot ¢ . c ° ° » 0D 4 > > S~ ° ow ‘ ‘ . += C t C o 1) 7 tx} =} c > U Pd z a aan - @ = t * C } > é 4 — 4 io J ( c c ry G , ot . 5 c © c 05 - = 1 J c «= « ‘ 1 . re £ 4 “4 =~ 2 . . a4 5 t S (J > . a t- ‘ . cl 4 . . = 7 ci Ww t $ C {x} Te 7 | c 4 ¢ r4 - -c . - -- : . ch 6 ~ ” i = * t ' ' i i ! i <r e e e ee a ee ee ie ae ee ee <_< oe oe OO « —entmenmencectn cineca wr > Wainy . . a e . ‘ ‘ 7 5 * » . Tv a € ca r ~ i € . o- i £ w « i a . 4 : t e 5 * C - - © s j . . c . j- « ev t C ‘ c i $ t Tc C i . s. $ . q@- 7 . ’ + “4 + a b. ) G b c 4 + c cu oh oh 4 ort 4 i ¢ C 3 oay TSO aH. 4 on r ‘ . 7 ms ° ; ) + f . G J : v ‘ ee © Se MO a a nn a A a Ce = SP — A G AES Se eG SNS NS see One suenS NE eps aS ee een SN a8 a 83832 ees ee ES ER OS eS OO eee nage samen ones a ee ee rm € - +4 f GO € * ‘ . « rt ef » . ‘ Cc oO ‘ ‘ 4 bs + C Tt © fy x ¢ & ~j ‘ oO ~ a 4 one pom 4 IN © - - . i} Oo + 2 ? oct a 3 = ; >< : © 2 ss wo — —: - “~ ‘ 7 < © a oO ' ‘ u ™N 4 4 ae e== , ; . i R ‘ ' < ‘ tr - a : . : - ” = ‘ > < P ' ‘ ' c <3 ‘ © ‘ ss oO Oo £ oC cs - > cS Ss SS s + ) oO: > on ow tanna- » cASF 0 2 ° oO Cc ¢£ a O {oy a ® SS kK. & 4 ss oO O O +r \ . + + ~— 0 © & ‘ » a m Oo OC ey + ke OP wo ° 2 J i my e- + 4 on wv © 6 . C. Oa ANY’HHNO Badme wal ow 6D m- i fs w 5 5 © a tO 40 hy 4 - 4 > @ « Cc O C e + D3 Be e+ G+ ao TH WM A = « os YMOYk 4 SO tic ; , Sin “J oo “nn u% O QD a O OO crOMCTOENN A OD. © - aime on g ' & Vx _ a 4 faci o oO ¢ c : = mw<t a - Po, Or oO i Oo oO Ost : eee oe ~ o ma V 4 oad .< $ = . Oo : y 2 cet cn SS») S—~ oO O Oo * wn AV i for Ji af ] ry ) ‘ x 2 ae o a £ WM C4 SO be ee c Cs <n Ore Ti ode = + > we ne Cc at 1a 5 4 : O 4 ¢ a. € eo c 13 4 eq $. &, 2 + . << < ” C gs ¢ O & = — a e <6 4 Ba . Vv eae — 24 hese ; = 2 & ‘ fa, ¢ c Vv oO 15, 6 3 — n Ps > A haben SS Se ee ee ee ee ee ee ee = NA NR Pie” MPI ee - To — TF eT “e Sin oe “= ee > 7 & 3 es eae eer § ¢ a a ake OPO mg SE EE A apo ee OD "8 wr 280 P i 9 emer - - P " r a e . . ~ EE, iK 4 ho ad _.) Al} Ww FLRST ae aati ee ee al A RP as AE A Se ee ee oe oe at a a . t ' ° i . i ia Tv i . i > ] . 4 7 . . ] a C b E 3 C ¢ ° ‘ “ > 5 5 <n es an C oT a . e ro = 4 . » : ; : . . y © ; Ps ¢ f Pe. t ° O £ t ; C ‘ “r “ : : ‘ wo et + 5 : . 1 c $ » C w - + @ 4 c 4 & 5 cS c = oo $ oS o ; . e c c * @ G < ‘ co > So a t - . tol cs ed S. a + . " < u a ) - Ss a © P= s i + a t ‘ 2. o = Sis = © t oa € = « c © => «< t = ‘ . r raw) ” , s ‘ a ‘ < > ‘a = Se — et : Sooo Os *. 5 : = © @ = @w oo~ + < & c > « ' -“ + %. Ss © = ie ¢ Se ge § co oOo r + a o Oo a +s Ga - ot ye 8 G oe ars c a » os ZS Da o » oO Ss @ 7 @ © oO mm wes £ C ‘ © co - = & © f @ < ID = Cc e che + oO i 4 ° oO a ‘ oO ta Qa @ * 4 * + ~-oOs @ OM D E He; r= a ¢ &% Qn BS & 2 2 6 S&S & & no Pp eo Dw = 4 bf 3 2 M + Cc oO co s ‘ O34 no c- o GBM =} ucoo or Os = Ore a oO nS. O Seaovses M tS. 4 ow Pri Os QO. OW + : ei bs c « >. O ww © ¢ > 26 0@ Ose & i _ £. sa _Haws &.° < © om! ¢ co = 4 oO “Mn OO ELH @ OH = © T wo 4 +, % So .— = OS Wee > — a GS: O c wm ¢ © . ¢ >» a- GQ a S& Orie - me < s&2cos ah 4 § Mm & & ¢ "eA nS — ° > t O- nen a . . ee oO Om oO e 3 GS ib; ef O < cOns ‘ < < = oeouwv se S&~— 04 oo OL $ ei t © 4 + <= & $ a= @ = O° Lp) Y Ps Ua Oe + : @ ¢ ¢ C ¢ >° oe Qa S®Ov & TH Ord b&. >: O > @ © 3} ~ GOn+.- Uw Os cS < = oO mer “+ Ceri = © ~ a w > & @ Or ¢ s 3 Sri 1 @ Oe ao mM Ww o MS om c © + $ as t ° ¢ oO Gc t& @ w ors ord Tx. @® : oe “ poe ge gee > i : O & %.OnO abe oS 4 = O = c c Oo + t O. O c O fu 4 NL. EwWwp»p + 4 S4 ° it & & Ss ¢ @ a » “A= &d OO GG = i aot O: ~ OW O i S$ + PO Mer OO x >. <= 5 Oz ; ” . C Lew Ga = “2 om ~ ee Ses ~ oer eS = ) c C 4 ¢ 320On O- 2 E CF ct Anes Of i *r go oO . & ee ed $ ce YO >.4 : “eri > y + Hr Gd mv U 08] Cow £ $ b. ¢ SO eee eo tk CS @ $& f ® ; oe eas ae ; ‘ e- . . - : me = S So et = Se 2 “ cf $ C oC C Ss OG + @ Sis OHO Ges ‘ aAerocon £. Dt > , oak >: = : << casas ot ene oe : b © aA COENYSYZ= 120 x HF PAse Sie ck Se - & y G 3 = & hes OES 4 é . o< af ona oO ) t ofc 0 6 anc Om & © GD oS = mo SS G% @0O thc Oo ef~®w E + } Cc » OOD Cc ~ @o> Q or oO Ctr Oo & 0 & 1 4 oO EN & “&¢ « C O64 4 MoO & fe = 3 ‘& Oo Poi w oom dv Os C $ @ oO nT .ovocr ¢& oO me 8S — & 4- mi ws + OC 7 6 ws oD & x Ly 5356 He x] 4 oO ~Y + o S. + v vc oO & 4 nat T C ‘ cw cm oO. + & cs 1, § =, = G2 OT a < C : wo oO zw 3s. & ae PeiOft ©U cf «+90 - ° Oo Ye CHUT ® 4 ow) 8 ° coc aor kh ¢ Oo co Oo x oc @ 1 Qua wy cof UO Q aes ~ e— & _ riesw- oO 4 v 4 wo ¢ Gomes ce Nix © mT OH @ UY +r C 6 eo on s+ & j 1D DA Ot oon oh te 2 ie = & & ori 0 § : Mri 4 . : cS @ ‘ I Ea > Ger 4 E 71 Y 4q m + om > Op ¢ £ ? f T & lanwtouvue sD 4 2) Q 1G. ¢ 4 . Sw. t ny « © os 1G Ho Os 2 7 : Ace c rt Es 4 TH O G < IVOMDG-nee oS Gy ri £- NOApwe Oo seria &UD ¢ 2° = $ t a oy Y & OoO@gQ 3 6 =) O@ c- nox tr L a C3 = mM * m + 3 C C oO © 4 — fx PS EE AS A SS SS CS Se ee a Se me AS AE oe — An Ee . ee a ae ee ~ As ie . © * 2 Le ots Sot ga it a a “TA weer} Ter oe) ound heme] | Bs | vaatt Ca | ht rN ' ni | ep ema AF ics ! i ' j i ' i ' ° oot ne WY < Ov cs 1 a Answe’ 7 2 ms . a a - 3 re - - es rm - . . . . - + - . ee ee ~ e . ~ ¢ - = - - ee - 4 . - - ; . - © £ « < ‘ » YL ‘ . > . Z = EA = — ere ; % hn thd thaon 1p ale gta a wewrgn ~—e OE AO TO - —s . 2acn ¢ , a ao re or + ndan f"¢ de on ‘ + <— Oo + c b = CG or t 7 + .< is . c 4 wc “* 4 o ° 4 — oo = . cq c - © + os = a - @ S > a @ 2 r the Sus erior +f has aybmi 0 er As fendant , ine ) i ts @ > C & oS — 4 c - + ” t: 6 8) C bw Bow ; . . ) a = ——— ee ae ce a = Sane ee cents ee SS SS ee > ¢ ¢ : : o w O r ** wa =e ¢ 5 : G C c a S ~ o VY ¢ : . S ey Sd Se G 6 oS q ‘ — fl ® A es c s 7 Tv rj coc t dS 4 G é - c S oS , G — _— ome — c t oo : 5 H = = b L <4 +> Has Lo « b s © c a = © . & 4 exes ones eats OS aS a i pee : ae x ~ c c — W wo 4 Gq ¢ ¢ G Gq 4 “J @ i S : fr} c - c ¢ ; o C t + . Q = c ¢ Ps } 4 + a ‘ C 7 a ; ; 2 > $4 + a eG : J ¢ C C : - : ™ c os . @ c a pat walk . + ~ W) & U ; - c > Co C c q O s - t cn S = . - r -- . ; ¢ ‘ r . - : ‘ 4 e ) *e 7) c ec : € . ‘ * : - * < = Qa = © Q a . ; n + oOo $. = t = > ~ ; . ; ; s = + @® w wo < > Co . + ‘s E o = e . $ cS c ot ‘ e — : . ™ » » yj = ~ © = c> 3 t ; : “ : : : a ‘ 3 -—~ x ¥} < $. o ? c bo j cS - “r s ; : 4 P = = + > 5 : »> ec > ' ’ . - : = : ' \ ‘ : ° ; ° : a YL Ls + . - 1 4 ‘ - a c ‘0 » . . ° 4 S4 < t € w c on ra : ; : < oc s - t c ‘ ¢ e a b. c » oOo r < c = r > s- Ee £ afk ‘ G4 4 4 . wal 8 x = = x Cc ¢ « t ‘ S : = = ¢ r - » oO c > 3 . a © ” . 2 . ‘ Q b t - . = = as S. . s Cc — C re : Q ” 7 $4 = de c G 5 . fe . eI - “ 2 $ ms E- fr} © E+ > “s ; : s oe oO a ~ — Se * c Oo C. 4 t ; © tri ‘ ‘ ' =} c oO 6 “ “ . ¢ C7 ‘tg Cc wo mT § aN cc «C6 |S G oie ° w Oo. | ® — is > oa a : - > oe — & 3 5 ff >. & g p= 6 ee e = Te . S « S S . G = Oo = tH “ i i § « in i ' ! ! ' - E a = = Go rH ¢ < ~ aie | f 3 u“ U rc COURT MAY TERM 195) i. MAY Orp yy Avr TPwR t 2 iR LOR . rx pe ux & eo : =) i he ‘ © re =. ~ ati CARO LINA spsLL COUNTY a 2 Cc i c oes < of Cc -ion vy INaSt ST t+ Y tho 3 / Pe aOmm ,O + tor d s~MaOAN,W + ¥ o> a ana SY Presiding doe . ‘ { ‘ ‘ r t c « + : > : © b. % t . | } » i } c > j + A . | t - © ~ i r | . we ee se > ~~ <r teter ae ee ee Se ae Se ar eye OSE ee ee FL elas pee es pee Se ads al ins We ‘ rr a A tet rs] = - — ‘ ci a Oo = % » se cS > 2 < 4 (+. $ e oO © + mn | ! ' 1 ‘ ! & l “ i s 'a YU + { - i: C i » j <- —_ ~~ 2s = rs © j . —s i = S » . - ae aa TC ¢ . as q ‘ a= © £ ” ‘ Scoll =" xe - - . vam" ¢ , Qj mg + - 4 a % i c ‘ Y © s u ( ° ( co + & 4 fx S ‘ t C - ' o na : ~ , wo or =~ P os U - £ F j a, i C sa ; , a 53) ¢ a wo a - & & > wo a + + 4 i <t : VY ® o- = a oO & t 4 £ ¢ - i e pa o @ | : c . c G = OO O U + w t c - wo 4 c n ow © ra ort 4 ee - Se = <x . x KS - - o 2 aoe v - e. = a 4 « < o E a s t = i as . v4 : : a : , | : c + oO x Sy fs - ae te . co ‘ | t + . a o S s + ao o ® ow Oo = - . j c « + . “ ; ‘ w oS ° Oo $4 le . iD o = s, oOo is $ < oO Oo a £ Gq th. oO « .. <— oO eC =o = cS oO . ‘ s “ . r °o G re) oO cS Cc + se - v wo Oo ¢ 4 » ba S ae or c OS . wo ¢ + + a $b. dea ¢ as € ¢ | = © od nae a a 1 XB L s: W c &: Oe ; & w = er fx] q@ © *| © + rc x . E pe $ i j G oo Cc E + G 4 4 e j > C oO aes ci j r ° - c = c r { = rt 4 W) Y x = © Ss E . {> ro cc at He c : i oO + | & u 4 om ! - e * > | > 7 wast § ad a | : : oF §.cN + CT + | ; . on 4 wo ¢ | 5 Mm § Ss $ wo + t i = _ A, 4 @ o ; . = | . — 8 f G + ¢ C : . yy G + U ¢ | s ; . a o a s _ f-} 6-7 fr] fx) $ or 4 Oo | S - IN OND ‘ Monday, by Wau efendant S ¢ QD d e a 2 S G 4 ee a) So an PP AT TEA elect a a wee ee SAREE ST ENT NE ES — - ere: a - lie = ee SE eae - n nan \ 4 oo © ) - ce oO <= e © on on ' ‘ ‘ - ‘ & . ‘ i - . ' oO : ok + wo ow wo - \ S E: « mcs ow c => o 3 a t - c ow wd s + - @ Cc . a] wo ow ~o + ea « - - * > -~ Gy a oO ° Cc ts uo s ; € + c £3 — oS oC rc rod oh c 4 +> & > 2 ra ¢ t 5 C s t S S @ o-t @ © £ c wo + + ¢ ow 2. < c G ow Gu s o- t +t a Oo wo re ee s. C c t Oo - ‘ = 4 ie ¢ 2 eS oO oO o ‘ ‘ e a © o Co = S *r £ G = = a ort C = p 4 a @ + £& ¢ Oo 2 Ss co s G J “ . ‘ —— Cl U ° VY and . , sai Pi el e 17th day of May 195L, on County; and the anual S on th inl Smith {2 rlowe mother , Louise omlitn Mar] jredell aa an ali = ae “not M7 + defendants a + > : od | : C 2 E + » co c | 7 a ei uN = ¢ . | 4 tO Cog T C — om - —_ : OS 4 @ Des gy <6 | . C cs t © in ite ° 4 4 i . TT @ j of o- FUN a i Es On @©@C nm: Tc i : 5 ‘ c “i 3 09 3 wo s ° c a a 4 > es <1 u ‘ & = 1 ov Oo <« t ~ 1s “4 0 c ‘ a sa * Cv 4 ° c =. ! > +i © ( } . . c ’ . go . cCUT + 4a + ¢ rc | ¢ as > Oooo. € , : 4 o s , 4 C Ot ws 4) SS or NN ng “ > . milo ones » o ; 3 = * - £ ox a eSn A OY OO . Cc ° c ’ w D ooo st Ue ; : \ r be G Zas esoso ‘3 é a “— . 7 : . ‘ ; i = He Pri OT aZ q m C “ © f Oo a é : es 4 } © . + . 5 ast > bei ‘ . . C t cS © > ° > oy wm C5 cS cet) e : nm . ff On ey 2 oT o 4 . c 5 a ee ioe ' 7 7 — " ‘ > , - - So movda 2.2 © C © oe « : . 4 : hi 2 © + C oO A ) ° or + “ano « he « oa - ( “ a “Sno8 & Bee ¢ . : 7 = Ga o o ‘ ‘s = ‘ 4 Zo ee ya t C \ ° 3 : PUS HR GES FB ° 4 . > 5 ; Sees c i OS S ar ) ) t on a 5 r c > : HH wo < f= © = < ro | ‘ ~ & 4 S > oO rt ¢ } in . . o. ‘- > oO at . x 3 : + oO ? . : : Oo es + oa = co — greg c a Ss . ‘ 7 e «3 fo ond a -— « ” = . 7 4 c a 4 4 ‘ - a a o ‘ « c c ‘ t -Q er + c = 4 a ‘ 1 £ .2 8 4 a . e 4 , - ; , . ‘ < > ‘ ‘ e @ « ct « « c c ‘ G + > ¢ $< . @ oS a os < ss + ‘ - $ a < oH 4 © = ¢ Ss 4 € - . a c 4 wo > 4 . c 4 : ‘ ‘ 4 >. st oI o - : S ‘ ‘ . 4 b Cc e ys * t s Go Of, & & ° . ; j nt ae ad an Oe 4 s ‘ c : os S oe : oOo uN Or 5 : , S > S ae a oS : © onc “f 2©nG OG OW e ° - . j - . 4 0») BO = Oo a fa s t | ep uw wo on c a 7 ’ 5 + t sa > q@ er : : © Pisce & r ~ : r + G Orn & an . ¢ ¢ ¢ HG ¢ os or = i © <« Go oc s —t fx] - 4 ; wy oi. ~ 4 4 ‘ c co UC uw) 4 t re on 5 . -~¢ 4 4 + . wm $ a "4 . oc + 4 e- q ° a. * : ™ . ae — 4 : i - a 2S «Sh = + : 4 > w mo ‘ @ ¢ oH $ oO fr] Ms G t © vw a + . re c C es = + o . Oo mw ° es G ¢ = =z ON w ov fc oe = © ee 0 V4 Ses : ; © oO "te 1 2 ¢ ‘ rm pwn . f tris O a C co em — — =~ <— — —~ ~_- =<~ Ss ; S ’ = a? - 1 ° c C wo '> c ° t @ : [oa > “J § w ¢ [7 c ° BK ££. §$ c — “ ° ~ > b, a ‘ » § Me > 7 * uy) 1 - a ny : c > - - $ I< aaa ¢ 4 - : rf] U 4 am , ow a ° br” 4 Be &] { + 4 . ¢ r e g ; = © 3% ec ; f — pa C rt a . c 'T 4 + , ECOND , . > ’ ra) ~O+ + a cee _ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND Wa&EK ---------- MAY TERM, Tuesday, May 25, 1951 ~ same being recorded in Mortgage Book 150, at page 150, in the off; ‘neg shall prevent theright of the said ! : ‘ 4 , 1¢ce of eb. net ister of Deeds for Iredell County, North Carolina. the j . gaveclosed and the property therein V» » the said deed Of trust haw: ne foreclo , avment tO Southern tanctineering Gomvany hy - « fear due advertisen ent, in eekaetanne we FP, Barre: 5 Baap nee : a | steel and construction wsed in tha hid “ ; tenn and the laws oO th ‘ r} \é Uilding of ; rust n Frovethe aa Aor gee 2 of land described in the said deed at aaa ee - MUst, this aragranh Ten he Con : ; ‘aan and Savines Hank ‘in Mortgage i i ei # ‘4 a i (the ( Paramraph Ten ef the Complasn' . ai It is further ordered, adjudged and z inet lecre ed +t . . * ‘an ny yer the cost of this action against sai ju 1 egal’ Companv have and recover 4udgmen from vanus stitutes 4 cer rred ‘ } ¢eq Jane aforesaid deed of trust dat A *r are t + ? t id od 0: 5 C . i¢ sal deé : s» the publ North Carolina, 1” she | : Come tone © -he lien of Ornamental 9 expressly ordered and decreed *? et the security interest a ing¢ineering Company in and to and that nothing nerein cone = N sday, may 2 Lue ny oe A te a ee aes 3 3 = ee a oie ss x. = ~ swe - ” ete as Ea = 0 : Solillieeste aa ot sn il ge eget — ~ yg os SS SS ad *« - - Be ee ee eg aaa a cantina oe pee == eal ‘at TT } or 4 RIOR ’ a) sat I f HE Sv K ay uw c Oo ce ar vy MP a4 MAY T 1954 c ’ 2) & spor i] [4 Tuesday, May ' andin all respects 1 iy tria a f a+ he r apr fisy i 1 "2 lan | ° . - c : ' ' wn . is os ; t ‘ > oS ° — 4 4 ‘ 4 < a = ? o < : ee 2 - , t ° a ® - + bd ® s . os w~ A o = c c 4 ~ < a .. o + $ £ u Ss a » * . + > + Q S < = t c <= c a 4 a - t $ ce % © . C : ° . _ <x ia) = ° > CS W) . C r c x = * e 4 G ¢ oo . oS ; - e uy s cc _ O + $ . * ; + + + v, . Cc GC C U me + + c c C Cc $ $ — A ° + 4 ew . - > > > A - r 4 ‘ ‘ CO é r ‘ j c c - G s ¢ c c 4 tL, 4 Cc . U sh C ‘ > . > S + af ‘ $8) + ' C c . "7 . . : a < C G . $ t 4 4 4 a t 4 c ' © _ 4 A e rf 4 * , , fs} xt — <~ — — — ‘ ee a s . © aa @ ~ rime me ™ Y . ne ! ° 7 ¢ : ry ~ aa a n q q «¢ t +9 : . ° c © q& C . or G c . 7 —_ Ca 4 me s > q - - € = bk . =— @ + | © Hc. oP) + 4 x4 53 ". i - oO o $ L 195 , 2 nA Vi, 3 ~ me re fe c oO | t> o weet enren-- MAY TER 25, 195) ‘ Cc ’ ri on s . « . > bee r 7 — fx o > c =— - _— ’ - = a ca . c . ‘ a r + 4 + ie “ Ee] w \ a © ra c <—~ SECOND SSS - ae =~ — ae re Bogen ses) aes | Ct (a RT 1°5) t } a ( a C ’ © NC . on ° e G Him + e s . oO © ae a Q : 6 . ee oe a oO . t r a vr 8 s Ss w, } c ° mis oe. 3 ' ‘ fx? 8 + c ‘ 2 ' e ° ~ fr] i - ° oO ¢ bo < a QR ca Ts oe) = — —_ . t . ' 1 ' * at @ a » i ‘ ‘ - : Ot OD $ £ c Oo . e 1 + i og Max w “ qa 4 ¢ . 4 4 a < & i} a C . - oO em © -; aa © e c ‘ ‘ 2 b, = O G wo r] cw 4 af r ° + fx = oe og ‘ ; C HO= oO. } Be: ee a ae : C > = ow S > c c 4 > : i: : © — ® 4 C ee t . > OH L te n & ‘ C ¢ : - O ° Oo ea 2 = ¢ BS on § : Y — SS SS "4 ce c oOo G. co © . + 4 ° © a e be q& oO q crt - ‘ . “a by . ' ‘ + + a do oOo - + F G ‘ 3 t ‘ : Oo. © - fr + wo . $ a , > , ; os Oo ¢ w o- G wT et r or otherwise Ww ‘ rn a 2 ~) + i - r - ~ oO Cx + + o = + Es s 4 . o G So m4 E < $ Z ‘ + S = 3 a @ ° ° o $ ¢ ° - = ont ° wm > + : ‘ ‘ => ' > < oc a ‘ ’ - - « wo + “ : 1-4 + < w & = wo -~ x a c < + wo & s x a a. 2 ‘ « ; S} § © S = % oe Ji /9\/@ « c < - > - ~« $ $ oo > on io a ae : d - c 2 + ee am! S + > d osc @ | r ot : . ‘ ; ¢ . > S - OO er = ¢ Oo ‘ oOo > E 5 me & a ert Oo ‘ s “ ¢ °* @ ve oO o o » oOo «es = i crt c < =< x , - © ad ~ = > Ho > o a west at . S na civi ae a am 5 G . A 3 O & Sf a ¢ ‘ : + <= q ri = wo G4 & a ae 2 Q $ — . = 2 < = — TU eo os + s < % +. wr Om >O q - 7 C c a 5 ° i a oc co is} & a. © > ei et #6 = - — : on. ‘a TF} sx A yy ; - ‘ s _ ei oc ay G a - a eco ( ) + c ts + = doer Oo fF} , ; C a a ae s cS ac e~i 2 pe > t a ear? g © ~~ @ © Of E ¢ ext 7 c Cc ° Tc Es ur S era.= ‘ : r om: - = © #8 §€ E+ ON co Sy tor ‘a 5 ™ = = Mes a0 «fo + ‘ 1 OS S. b “* S = ExLUOosT ; i ‘ 4 \ w” wv q £ oS a oO oa @UwT dar >’ x » o 7 te °r ci Oo © NC %jw0O ss < 4 y $ mN Weim © ¢ | 5 . ( S ® oa cc &, 5 | ; - ~? - $ ° oO = oO $ co & ¢ | > > MX c c 4 © A H o ° } sm $ i rc a Cc fn i and K ---------- MAY Rarker, a = - bat hn c Q c < ° a — = oy oi oO < WH 7 ; + c fa _ 4 u ~ r o~ ~ Offi — wo wo eS oc 4 es G G Tw . & ( C é i o Sc e@ C ; : 2 ih @ LnNnnn ‘ : ’ ss eos xO ‘ t : : ale a ek ea : : . ne == oO & oy 4 : : C . + = eo c : > ©O@e . Ogio - : B + { | | { | — <_ ee - te oe “ . ss — ™ - ‘J at - A - °° o e ot £ © - ~ x c e t o c + ul - ‘ G . = - . . Cc ¢ c 4 Be : * . =o o « 4 " oO re or aN 4 " . o ow a ‘ 4 oS ‘ a 5 oot : ° + ee 2 ik Zé 3 GQ a . © Or c c ) se 4 “— e ° . 4 _— ¢ ct . ° j oS 4 =< . . B = > q — 1 dd . ws 4 = C C mp ° < A . ’ c ‘ Co ow = oe - q a c = e <> ; - ° a Qa e T. . . . e ° a A 9 Ea rm SS ? r4 ° - ‘ ce w wo 7 ‘ ¢ oN ® © E A a ~ ™ & 4 c q r ah © os ~ cs of th “2 > = —4 ; o =F re ; fox AE aS iy an ch et 2 . aa Fe tv: >. > RE Ri gr = Ss te Sr i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK Wednesdav, May 2€, 195) St; aayvit Aavivt tha arts defendant to appear before this Court on Monday the rthouse of redell County ’ cal any he had, whaw ¢ ard, tha NAV defendant § +} + +ha hat the why the defendant oane=eenee MAL TERM. TOS w » "ay 24, 10 defendant, of the olaintiff the Court on May 17, ee =. 7 ’ ENterag } 7") Ne Vitv of States. fonday, o'’cloc — hearing OF residing, 84 Meg otclock, ~ resented Yo? wr A+++ Uv Rattley, * t ince Thursday ° nor sould not Tr was entered ++a0 That ii 5 | 4 (321.00), and IN a short time aft in this action, ce elf and for the child in in Irede} 4 that the Cally able Order was ] defe + jefendant, to encage entered at in some er the the hills in connection therewith oi 2 tobbv Franklin legal and Term August the THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK N Wednesdav, May 24 mM MA , 1951 os ierce, n able- rainful occupation; 1053 Iredell County Su IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- MAY TERM 1905) , ar "? ) Vednesdav, May 24, 195) jefendant was gainfully emoloved in Jacksonville, North Carol; , ol na, and making aronr ants required under the orders of tha Court and wynti7 so 7 ; i © Sf0uny menu A Ua i > comvlies Fortv-five Dollars (3L! per weeks that if for any reason the defendant h ve NU has } NBar this Court or is otherwise discharred according to law. loved since January 12, 1954, or for a portion of said +tin UPR AW DT ’ ’ aid time, he Would haye IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND pecReen bY “T)e Jilin, led to draw and receive what is known as unemnlov + n as unemploymen compensation, 1, That the defendant, Bobby Franklin Pierne , at 9s . “rt. in that he has wilfully and without lega} rt, in t 1 a J y thic der the Fandaant Ranhnh« Tw * rs Cc 18 OF he defendant, 3obhv Franklin rlerce, bases wfysed and neglected to comrly vwrentc Webi Panth + } ) NY} } avments § ortn in the order oy he he defendant, ort Yr Orth) : 2 erior wu S in arrears on th- Le a t : hree hyndres © mundreg * | 3 ee iy a } a i } . nd committed to - 99 ¢ 1} th j ‘ syagte u ~ I 4 . orders of je Court vy Franklin arrested an . eam e the ayments be there confined until he has made the pa e! — “ TaAINntYy ) conne ee lo) : at 7 1953 Iredell County ou Court requiring that 1 this cause at the August 1erm S70 pay’ the ‘ail until he has made th eS i _ ~ 2 . Soren ge eres a ee le IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEBK -------- MAY Jednesday, Mav 26, 1c and until he complies with the orders of this Court, or is otherwise q;: © discharge, according to law. A copy of the aforementioned order is hereto attached tached, The Sheriff Iredell Countv, or anv other lawful office : i= cer of Irede]} n VOUNnt Sheriff or anv other lawful officer of any county Within the State of d. it sth b e of Nor+s wherein the said bby Franklin Pierce mav be found. is h wne? in Pr) rs : Pes HAV O€ Und, 1S nereby Commandas 7 Manded ed and - > , ne said def. ndant ‘ Rokhby Frank) in common jail of Iredell he there conf; comp] ied with the orders af + ns f i a i raers of the Court herei; ae er AOYrAiNne + ate rccorain ore 1¢ d, however. ths +e - i a+ y vila 7 Honor de ne , wt : . a: av" OF sss ¥9 - Filed a mote counsel, rs im of One Yyndred Dolla! fore ° ($50.00) hereto 4 said mot-™ ifty Dollars ‘ at notice of said motion, 4” who 2 serces . fred be Pi fierce, andon Al re of ror the hearins ¢ m, to appea ’ lerce, and to ti. tion on Monday , May 24, 1951, the defendant TH CAROLINA apm UM ERIOR COURT rr 4 U a 2 | QD Me uw 9 InN TH a (™~ min 4 - § > co & @ &) 6 & i ' i WHEF Ln ursday, SECOND SpELL COUNTY {no ft ai RM, 1954, , ‘ Lo mm MAY n vary ¥ row Stallings, ff, Plainti VSe S ings Defenda 7 tal tle Re 9 comi oO w Hh 4 > hefore ca A hear rane , jousseau and +h aha anc 4 ‘OP KAY (pn ae aledeeaaaen tea eee ene ere ead / dus ee SA . < Avigning: 2 ae se Z EEC R RTE a as 03 t COURT tI Oh IPR ate SU mn x) TH \V I} ee ee ee oe ee ee ee ee 1 Witt ‘ny My n wy O! a id 15h AY TERM, 1954 V \ 7 1 A” « , May — ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ner . a EK Thursday, A cal SECOND nn U <p oe ee ee . ° W) S . + Gq T Cc c C $. O + OU" qe & i 3 bo + = ° oS ¢ ri * Sc ac i , . » © €> Ww . w wo mS © > ° f. <= ot c> Gon t ety 4 wo . tx ort @® e+ A aH ts * > = ta 4 < s - i : < = 4 = © E-- a = oO © > — wo LN oOo oO» — a 2 | ° % ae = 52 | — a a ws fr] an © — I fr] —— a_i oe = tH Sy oO in + Ls wo q $ £ » . G w re ¥ oo S fx] c E Ss oe © s a uae g rs C = nr * js ~ rh oO or > > 4 . = oo — 2 . -~ 2 7&4 C ¢ x ¢ E ¢ ans KH 4 ao a rei é Ss $ 4 : CS os 4 YO i + r} rm Cc) > w c - = ro a . f= : ersigned } nnd 1 . . . . . ° * . ° * - . . . . . ee - . - e 4 ¢ - ‘ . t - ; ‘ « t «tT . s 4 4 2 ‘ \ ow & oo ey a oo « x . € c - og « = « < e . a ‘ Gs < + co} ~ ‘ 4 eG. om ° ‘ . e c ct’ uv ‘ . - » c 2 eH a orn C 2 ‘ c rs} c = c> = r} ‘ ? ‘ ‘ t er oO © ar T l co - — } . ct ee + - e aa e's - . ce . ce j «& . - + ~ - . $ Gq 4 i t Cc i“ | ©. Oo : i . i . + a c Q c ' i 4 C a C 4 rt ‘ ‘ i ny U ¢ 4 t . © © » ° € oes q T . - | ro) W ‘ i a ' . ‘ ¢ ' K ' + t c i > u + ° . i U > c t Fs i * a £ < a - s r “ wo ¢ cr 6 ¢ - . i . 4 ) 4 | or~ “ ' [ C at 5 i - , 4 . ° . + > oe ‘ e ‘ « ' + £ G& i ‘ - . See acta nn epapeeaganereis a > . c ’ 5 . 0 © t ‘ U . A . c . ‘ ‘ 5 a a = co se = = a eee ae +h ° aro rh v1 ee bree eel Be IN THE SUPERIOR couRT TRY omy SECOND WEEK --------- MAY TERY ini iN IHRE S ] ORs is aprnn : t r M 7 ; Sts ew wee ee Vv , 5 hursdav, Mav 2 . 195) OBU ND " auf \ : i Thursday, May 27. 1¢ ,. i ttlement which has heen agreed to and are to ¢ a, | ; : aid out of the : aS Said “15496 C i TA mt ‘al \ vORTH CAROLIN: ATTRIT VW } g le : - ¢ at ee pee 5 ‘ ‘ : a COUN rt, after having examined defendan and inautred as + beta REDELL GUY! ’ ' O Als in. . v p= a1 mM } ° ° n , : sc ke ‘ . a , Lh : aanwey CATTHER JR Administrator he " 77 ~ nr irred, is of the o nion tha? + } hate \eoce: ie y. SANK&1 gsALingont, sil @ P oa . } i os } n ! ‘ ] ee Aree ee ; , vege — N1lCN has hy ~¢he Estate of N. S. GAITHE S af Sté of tne ; t ® var ight reg of ate and his . ‘ } C 9) } Peri : : , , 4 wno Ss a VS. 0 5 ; sonah}) +t] nt ’ hat +} 9) eh 1A ae ' “ ls ; ai 4D0rovede AAR “9 A Fua * ’ 9 ne Sto { + rat; viel canal . 2red and der, +1 a _ , " i 4 y o np . ’ : Nat the nla: . are of \ > Aof ¥ “+ + ( : : e i ° a 4 bs . ( 2 aic nen « 3 nto b * r +¢ ’ y y a Fal lows ‘ . ge d rues This cause coming on to hea ar . 5, i : 7} x ? Ye Y’ "” + + a : e é . 7 . . , , 4 i * . . a senate saint ha , er oy, 1¢ ! ; +o Davis a tetnaets , idge Fre 3 e “a err, , “ ‘ 3 fs 4 = e e 7 , : a ap : ct : ; Sin ehatnet ft. # Fic ahs ia ‘ { ? 9 rs pF us +c . ’ e an “+ are 4 i: ’ . ager? arg + 3 aay rr +o +} ; + » , i t agers a L : 4 x : ; : y , re + ~ + rant = ° , + . ‘ : | + - “* . ‘ s wy i sisal iia se aet we satwnet +h | a - - + - , . . * | ° - x i ' : , . ® ¥ : _ ” ie ee ° , if tt t . ° att . . , | ihe sa “ - a. = = = —_ = a ein —_ aaa a ee aes —_ " — a rcnconnseeti ees qu ~nemensannegaemnelinatagaain —- 2+ t c = 4 y 7 ad “Ar r . m 5 “ ’ . ‘ ; ’ os -—- n? " . . e . rv ae ee ee eee ee O! Tame r 6 . ee ee -—-——— ee ee eee “~——-——-— Taneiv : . . > -<—_Seee eee eae anew ee = ~_——<—<—-<-=— sC! i ‘ e . ° ° i c + on ae ore ° Yoo vw GQ FPAT FIN oCcort eeeee oneceaecece ” Tame iy ‘. ana seen eacaceeenesee ,0! ° ¥ ee ‘ar * ’ ; ° . ee eae ea nmacaanaonaeaeea= ¢ anti > " 5 . . . -_- ee ed Oy rs y » - . . . . 3 hea - : -—<—-—-—=— 4 , . —— me ee ce ee ee ee ee ee ee ee *ra f ‘ . , rs ~» + ¥ - ° 9 . . © ( r Tan " ‘ : + ~-<-«—«—<-=- 4a ” e . y C *s 4 J -~——-———-— -— ‘anti! > . > e * ‘ NOY ee - Yant 7’ ‘ i ' oneeace Us ° e ° -——— a ee ee ee ee ee ee tant if ‘ noaee ,0N 7 . ° . fo -“————K eer ee a a a a a J : . whe Court 5 ’ -~-s ¥ ce : = . : o + + a y ] ] . ° . . ie ° ad © ] 7 . ‘ ca Scent aAhiurn get , g . e ° ° mre rag ——., ¢he VO : ‘OY *4n1100 T ‘ / ’ ; ‘ ses v ’ , + apf ” ap ‘ ’ lane + 21. 3° Rawr? : 4 : . sre e e ie Cc ‘ 7 . tha One GO ‘ ‘ont o om od ib / te . Pane i ness / , 7 ‘ad pe Yonti! ; ] i Ka . ~<a fe ° . . 20} ‘ e e nan’ Cr fate (cr ] ee ex na ° atnued by the Ue Tae ea . ncent UNCY aaaasseeasecnceaaeaGOnt 1 Nuce / 2 a5 2 . / ai r/ | ; ¥ ‘ ry . ‘. ’ rT e © A f Or ‘ ee ey a: , eve j } Vab 4 4 Rants . 4 i 1int 106 36 vm +@ OX% 4 wo the You i ac ¥ gine Y tant ined ; Og ewan nanecnnsaesnaceeaeeeeneee (J ON n +i kj pial ana gol : —cemnciaeR ce ara ee " eo J Fa r eee ees oo < spo anyT ) Ae 4 _ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- MAY TRRW Thursday, May 27, 105, ” 1951, IN Miurt ~ iN 401 l SUPERTOR COURT MAY, 1954, CIvz TERM ae cai wea ~ rR ‘ Tarr » vy superior Court at the May Term, 1954, at Statesville North Ca law at 7 rv Wir ar + : : ri o ler of alino dente lites that it appearing to the Court that - tented an arti in the Gitmaet an Baume as : an ited an a on in the Superior Court of Iredell County against the 9 VOYrre a Vr naa + +h . +) + sy rn ; ’ r a ° a snsa ¢ nor; na in apt tim . laintiff served notic rvec n “+ + a a} , ~ . ) } O appear and snow cause whv an order sho not he entered cor: 4 C I red Ccomrar:. vn ‘ aa aa’ . > ’ ° Y i 3 ron ” arta ta ton +} Taine as Yn 4 iain e ‘ ‘ — + iP uo a iat a+ : } i 2 s€ a i 2S neard On dleac- rit ; “3 n PF lavits, the testir wv of he plaintit ~ Y ° ++ a Se af +) ~ A ind +ho ar? : 77 . - ec ° . . + 9 is , yed toveth ‘ V e 4 . 7 2 = ‘ e ¢ + niainei® . s i . i i 2 ‘ , " » Lupe rin bh ne ser ‘nt ° + 7 ~ + mo ¢ e } n° res n *ne iT 1 1c 4 roxima ] i915, 4 nenc ¢ that she o * * fy ] 5 ; i ais hie - +y, North Carolina, "9 “ a si nh she sec ( 2-3, AA+7¢ t ‘ : , . anthe ¢ 3¢ n ac - } ° 7 vnanerty Wr. mon all hay Ona oo0er we : 3 € 44 i . ‘ . seru owned r ~ ) 2 hot t ll 000)$ a ry one ° ‘ f . A ment 158 °% r we - ‘ é arm mach y* 4 } 4 {on 1.00 ‘ ( "4 nv »* ; Yr ¢ oN ne nar , Od i . po tlearrs m ‘ fH? a! ’ t r+ » + ’ nt 108s n tne own 9 +on 2 ‘ elw estima - ‘ ; i? — ts ar 3 are heey ar na 3] So lot owne' ‘ y +. 4 " 7. AN AnN\ - + " ne iv0-v rr Jolla “20, /5 cna on © ; Jars " i Lares and Paw nt \ ‘ pepe i i a sate Piwe ho: cand Dell C [ approx a i i Nollar > 7 + $s ant ndred yose* r¢ y nA r y ~ “ “+ r ‘ yor ve 4 ‘ ~ at ¢ 4 rox ated vO ao 4a non- ; —e +qjrety iv ” it as © t "AON er-+ Ow? | an estate hy the en : 4 - Ca” ww — no l@e te par e ted as ap nem f ee , . a + peraté 4 ir ( ar the plaintiff and defendan opera . aths ei a ‘ » past several mor C e Iredell Furniture Companv; that for the | ; . 4 ur o of the 0 under an order TAT mryr ‘Tr ‘Y 7 ° iN THE SUPERTOR YON] SECOND WEEK setae. ¥ AY To LNnuy sdav, av aT; 195) z +y receive the s e £04. toon which each party receive the sum o rty-Five rupee ye this business the liquidation of nis olf S e swt 4 a f ( Aan c O : That the plaintiff and defendant are fointly ay : Lf nr oximately Fourteen 4 ca " wrprance Ol appr mat 7 MY 10 and deven er a n ' FRE Oe ae syenty-lhree Cents ( 1h, 7 a 3 ) O] nas endny ss° +} jevent threatening foreclosure of the encurhered pronert re ~wurt stated that he did not wish to see anv of his operty dissipated or foreclosed and if it was nee oreclosure, he wovld be willing to sien th nec $4? ster and that he agreed to execut notes tn th rm — ee S dkecae. 2 ngs and Sign ar ed © ¢ 0 - those not la n> ff na Inallv or tr t+how ”y 4 4 That tha %¢ wt faye th “ tac 4 ‘ oe wetag)) ah) tr mrke + a+ rn + . ie a e 3 0 rede) Yr t Yr ‘¢ y } ) Y t r - , art } r isis’ Aaa euion y er re — 1 y Th at - c ~ we ’ Asan r rn ~ + - lina ar . > + ; - ’ a n > . 4 rr od wr ¥ ” y ‘ . ‘ \ 7 PA c a ¢ . P ' ° ne . e/g J j ( ty. : - , . i *ne ‘ ve i ‘ 4 4 ’ ’ i aT I + + © ‘- e | v ; ’ As l i ' red eae ue %- = 4 y ws ‘+ Af «+ AnFf . ¢ . +r } . $ retry. veé > Y oe ( n= i nr yy, if ¥ ’ r* ‘ ) i ve ——~ zc ww. O = Ov co m8 jo & « mM Et am tm fy 4 fe & 3 a + ra ' « x >} fx] © fs) 3 IO = € $, te S Ce r> A } Goodm Frank 1S Qn U a « Ss eo ei + SN A or — ¢ P O e-L w ¢ . on tS cs ow - ¢ . . + . . Stevenson Drac: wi SSC g}) a ’ LO ” eo FO “oO VOU ause r s 4 4 Thi ion + ‘ U 6. 4 * = 3 Sec ‘ 4 >? rvroan s5 oO ' s & > So © < + +ha tw on oO ‘ ‘ = ' ¢ oO S 4 c << oO G ‘ @ > os — | <s ~ ” ‘ ‘ YY s < & a ‘ : oO cs o + + AG & é ¢ e s: a Q wo : °o Qa t x a. oy b. + t oo «, ‘ G ” r ' c 7 c + $ 4 ° os 6 om © a + + wm + — r t r-4 Ss ral ‘ J ns - oO ‘ 4 ¢ S 4 - CAROLINA 753 LN Ga ae 2S 2 t rt re x O st fx, : > C4 x} cy a — 4 o /“ rei a YY — NTY COU DELL 4a x < oS Re dmon d + n << ee ee ee ee } ¢ O ( t 5 ° co ‘ t } t ° Cc v ¢ 4 b » 7 e . « c + + : “~ *r e % 4 7 C Gq ¢ Oo < ¢ a ¢ - ort 2 wo € O ont + s oC + SS os s r + * — v oO mons ( e~t E& © ¢ ‘i + Le TS GK € : * 4 ori or iw ¢ t 5 4 + rir mH t x - 4 ° n a a a : C > or-i ort = & e~) ct + C = . = = Cc ei a 4 4 . co c - - wo *r ‘ : ? . > a a $ + os v ? - ert ‘ . } a < ' a 1 ' 2 % -- ~ ‘ = + oO + v c % c G ; 4 wo oO wo a - 3 e = oO Cc a v < ‘ o ‘ c> : c 3 4 r s: e x ‘ ow wo wo c oO c & c « < ‘ct © . C, 1 nm S. £ ° U < £ Cc 4 ow 4 4 c s £ ° oc e~ s no $ 3 ‘ O et 4 « z + > C © 7 a b . © oO C $ « c ° t- ~ ee ed £ o c a Y & r © > a ‘ Gq vr rs a . & rr + C Tc . ee U $ 4 o ¢ hea ; c “ r 6 e SS c ! . - . 4 tY * € ¢ 7 + rt ' t - 5 C ¢ ~ ry + C . ‘ c » — —_—> —— ~~ c CT co t - + C - 4 - b & C ° : 5 ee . S > — § a ° TO CD C & c ’ So € ¢ cs e¢S . , a > et - e tT t > c oe on SN ne i a arc oy 8 ff have decreed that the plaint 4 4 imed an ty & 00 ror Hundred » the sum of Five tham ,* the defendants, and each c of recover fror +ha n ec sy +h oreaact liars Do erson “ - b.JG c . ‘ Io Pitt a eae + gre dt i ¢ . +] 2 bu} ¢ + 4% ** jr cy c > ~ Q ej f. oj + 4] © jo ; 7 G c 1 . . =i Bi “i : é 2 c + iE < ; ‘ Qa ® <= . + - - ® oS cat wc . wo + C as oT =< { oO ‘ ot 4 os o + c . on e - t - r t . ' r LODE * Oct << ee ee rr rT } ‘ + nt ; § COUNTY Clyburn, Pla \ TY ‘A3ARRU = Qn Vv N-SUIT ‘ J AN Yy IREDELL COUNT ry -VS- —_— + rmara Q 2rs Clyburn, Defendant ap a ia + ‘onorat a Bt 4 t £ ‘a 4 oO s + “3 Ww a £ L © e . Mm + u ‘ “ a 3 oO + i 4 S. w a & + a ‘ ‘Se eo a ’ « $ © : + 4 + Cc c rani - ct) * Cc + marr oO nan VU ary _ wor ny r , an NORTH CAROLINA IN THESUPERIOR ye “ J 45722 Count ica CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ‘BELL COUNTY Statesville Industrial Bank, Inc. Plaintiff satesville Plumbing & Heating ‘ciel Inc. VS. jonpany » ’ Plaintiff Lewis Hager and Claudia Tomlin VS. Hager, Trading as Iredell Furniture : Company vinnie Le Sharp, | Defendant Defendants THIS CAUSE coming, on to be heard and heine heard before the Honorable Ce This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Clerk of § super. ior Court of Iredell Caunty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court tee Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Cor nty, and } at ‘Aringe to the the defendants have paid off and satisfied the Indebtedness of the Statesvi]) ‘urt from the statement of counsel that all matters of controversy and ; sat. . ot in the pleadings have been arreed upon by the parties, and that the defendant Industrial Bank, Inc., and that the defendants are in the possession of the t ' hae t “o]j js seas} f certain } saa tee , neinune sisson ancl at bin hse personal property described in the said complaint and that Statesville Industria) 33 agreed to relinquish possession of certain items of personal propert set, out nthe plaintiff's Complaint, to-wit: One Hot loint refriger: +, model #iCe: Bank, Inc., plaintiff, desires to take a non-suit in this action. ' : : . : rial #061152 and one Apex washer, model #1015! It is therefore, upon the motion of Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward, attorneys erial f , , ’ has agreed to turn over said ttems of for the plaint iri ¢ ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and it js snail : - ‘ P ‘ofore been done, receipt ofsaid hereby authorized to take A non-suit in this act ion and it is ordered non-suited, ‘aia ind the defendant, has agreed to re] This the 18 day of June, 1954. he might have in andto said prope Ce. Use Smith a Superlor court hall be and belone to the plaint! keep, manare, use, sell, or dis: i secret i¢ an ' ° ant; ~ | ire HOTA nand that said plaintlf North Carolina In the Superior Court rivate sale and have and keep for Iredell County ‘lived at such sale or sales of tae upon it, } the defendant. herein: JUDGMENT Ma > plaintiff shall hence rth He ‘vc tt i" fp s , . meyvyen 1G: thal] have no further int rther agreed pay the costs of is ac i 3 * whic This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard hefore the Honorable . , . ¢ Ne plainti¢f and accepted in full accord and 8s isfaction there re omith, Clerk of the Superior Court, andit appearing to the Court ‘ror NOW, THEKEFORE. by consent ' tn ordered, ad dred, and dec the statement of the attorney for the plaintiff that the matters and things '! p F ‘Mtiff have and it, is entitled to possession of the aforesaid the plaintiff has controversy have heen settled hetween the parties and that iehts etohts rights, Oherte . - aa ‘ » , 7 aa erty and that. it , the said plaintiff, the sole owner © ut electea » te . man tl ‘ . . ] a Ge ike A nonsult. in its aet 1ons nd ine ; further decreed that the plain *rests in and to said property, and if is Turtner he t is ' refara in . i . ‘ intiff ' | 5, therefore, order ed, adjudged, and decreed that the pla t ° thie action te be texed by have and 0 recover of the defendant the nonsulited and be taxed with thecosts to be charged by the Clerk. the lork This 2 day of June, 195k, Thi ‘his the We h day of April, 1954. C, G. Smith - 2 soe wT ar the 3 jor vour pn ge aN mmc Clerk of the ouper Clerk of Superior Court One . Sented to bys reenter sFinch ““n8el for the Piaintit?r walls mfr Hs Batt Ounge) f ee ae or the Defendant NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRr inte CAROLINA : YOR IREDELL COUNTY 1RSDBLL COUNTY THE SUPERIOR COURT Vance McLean, Trading as M & W Motor Co. ] mntiff vs JUDGMENT wercrs Gertrude Sharpe, Administratrix, Cleo Scott, Deceased ‘ace Lynn Parker, r Defendant. = Bd are Sh mye eg a a This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G Smith, Cl k , ’ erk of Superior Court of Iredell County upon motion hy inti : E ’ n by the plaintiff for Judgment on the This cause coming on to be heard and being heard hefore the Honorable C. CG Ve Ue pleadings; Clerk of the S : 0 e Cath > ora } ‘ Peas . ith, the Ulerk © e superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the It appearing to the Court that summo \ j j i : Pt mmons was issued in this action on the2]s+ ‘urt from the statement of the attorney for the plaintiff that the defendant herein dav of March 1953 and a verified com: nt 1 i e j j ‘ : yr e mplaint was filed on the 30th day of April, iq file an action against the plaintiff arisinsg fror the same circumstances on which C f h ( I rCurstances on wnicn Vv 9 A 5 + e + nr a + 4 : it further appearing that verified answer was filed on the 17th day of Jy ul ig action was based; that this action was filed without knowledge that the defend cae ee a nia : and it further appearing to the Court that from the pleadings that the cause t's aforesaid action had been oreviously fi in this Court jon ¢c sis 4 b nr : on consist of the breach of an expressed contract as set out in the complair And it further appearing to the Court same being a Dromissorv note in the amount of $4620.38 pvavahle December 15, 1952 ‘ee office of the undersigned Clerk, interest thereon from the 15th day of December, 1952 until paid. ‘en served upon the defendant; and that ‘urther appearing to the Court that the plaintiff claims the right to n nis action; of one 1951 Ford, two door sedan, Serial #PINR-103449, in order the IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED same as provided in a certain chattel mortgaze executed by Cleo suited and be taxed with the filine fee to he charged ancillarv to the action the plaintif*® caused to be issuec This 1k dav of July, 1954. property and thereunder has the same in his poss pny therefore, ordered, adiudzed and decreed that the olaintiff have and OENTED TO: y recover of the defendant the sur of 3420.32 with the interest thereon from the 1): PF. G. Chamblee attorney for Plaintiff ary a i na oy | Mey 1952 and that he be declared entitled to possession of said pre- he | to sell the same as law provides and credit the aro therefrom upon the Judement herein rendered and that the plaintiff recov +) f PannvA } he defendant the costs of this action o Ve * hia , ae 7th dav of Julv, 1953 c. & site 4@ Clerk of superior Court ae es => SSS = nia — ed ee amines a < eae piisalsasatlie Nip Redeagid note Neemtinestl 4A5786-A STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF HORRY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANCES C. McGINN, Plaintiff, vas DECREE HUGH T. McGINN, Defendant. } ] c ; Honorable J. K. Dorman, Master of Equity for Horry County has filed hj ' 18 renor in the foregoing following a hearing held in Conway on April 11th 1952 at th : uy *726 at the Courthouse. The Master has fou that fijati j i found that a reconciliation is practically impossible 7 up his abode with another woman. The testimony of the plaintiff is substantially corborrated ~ var ) rated > other witnesses, andafter considereng the pleadings, report and testimony and j _ 1¥, @Nd lt appearing that the vlaintiff is entitled to the relief asked for in the complai , - ‘ Xu Mplain DECREED, that the Master's Report he and the same : herehy adopted 2a r £3 me ar na + " : Cc 3 ed and confirred and rade the order of this Courts: and that the said ‘fF le ye ree Mal $ h : } 4 f, Frances C. B in id she is hereby forever divorced, a vincula i - i ‘ ' ror the defendant Hugh T. McGinn, and that the bonds o f matrimony here- hetween the oart jes are herel v forever dissolved. the plaintiff shall have the custody of the four child Carolvn Jane MeGinn and Sandra .* in the house at Little Dlaintiff the sum of One Hundred of One Hundred Fifty (3150.00) Dollars ‘ieht to petition the Court for modification y, that is to in the event of death of eit or the plaintiff remarries, or any of concerne soncerned n of twenty-one, or in the event of marrying, or in ™ erervency then they mieht have the richt to petition the of the order. ; hild- that the defendant shall have the right to visit the ca reasonableintervals as mav be just and proper. . Badger Baker ne Judge 12th Ju ’residi ; Circuit. A TRUE COPY, ATTEST Fred G Graham Clerk of Court, By___Edna Mae Go0pet——~ j Ass't. Deputy a ae ae ee Horry County, ' 5811 ' «(gt CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1REDELL COUNTY Dn illa B. Smith rise plaintiff, Vs. ORDER 3, J. Smith, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Judge Frank M. Armstrong x; chambers in Charlotte,North Carolina, on the l2th day of July, 1954, upon notice ‘ssued by the olaintiff on June 30, 1954, and heing heard outside of the Fifteenth ndieial District by and with the consent of counsel for the plaintiff and counsel tor the defendant, and it appearing to the Court from the allegations of the com- laint that the plaintiff is entitled to an order for support and maintenance for rerself and her minor daughter and for counsel fees, and it appears to the Cour ster hearing the affidavit of the defendant and the argument of counsel for the laintiff and defendant, and based upon the defendant's affidavit and argument of sis counsel that the defendant's income fror through February 28, 1954, was not in excess of One Hundred Fifty ] $150.00) ,er month, and that T,, SL. heen oaving the sur the defandant, commencing with the week of Jun of Fifteen. Dollars ($15.00) per week for the support of his child, and 1 roviding the home for his wife and child to live in, on which he has been making conthly payments of Seventy Dollars ($70.00) on the mortgage thereon, een paying other bills and providing other thinzs which went to the maintenance and sigport of his wife and child: that the Court is of the opinion that an order should ‘entered providing certain defenite s forthe maintenance and support for . i ss ‘ oe , » wireumet ec &wite and childs however, the Court is the opinion under +h cumstances resented to the Court at this time that the defendant is not able to pay more tan Thirty Dollars ($30.00) ver week and kee; up the monthly payments due on the “ortgage on the home. IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND DECREED: m ° : Le fa y ¢ Mw. Ks That the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff, his wife, or to KR. A “ler, Attorney for his wife, the sum of Thirty Dollars ($30.00) per week, commenc~ “8 thursday, July 15, 1954, and a like amount on each Thursday thereafter, up to d including Thursday, August 5, 1954, and the plaintiff and the minor child shall ive in the home of the plaintiff and turin ‘ " . . : 8 Said period of time have the right to l “endant, and the defendant shall during said period of time kee; up the monthly on the mortgage on the home. All avin - “ents of Seventy DDollars ($70.00) per month , , . . if * "Me provisions herein being conditioned upon the minor child of the plaintiff an : : ; * defendant remaining within the jurisdiction of this Court, and the defendan nable hours during the Mavis : "8 theright end privilege at reasonable times and reaso aforesaid period of time to visit the child, and have th ‘ . ’ € child with him Within . AND IT FURTHER appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the jurisdiction of this Court, and to return the child promptly to her moth z i that e er at the que of action consists of the breach of express contracts to pay a sum of money time agreed. - nyed thereby, namely the sum of THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-SIGHT AND 2. The defendant shall pay to R. A. Collier, A ttorney for the Plaintity, 4, 1/100 DOLLARS ($35,138.77) with interest thereon from and after date at 6% ver sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for counsel fees to date, $50.00 of th : ' 1S amor ° baal gnnum y to be paid atonce and $50.00 by the August Term of Court. ie ee NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the ati Tart cqpiees tems 3. The orders herein made shall not extend beyond Ay gust 5, 1954, and this nd recover Of the defendants F. W. Morrow, Harold Winston Morrow and cause is retained for further orders and the case is set for trj ria : : ; ie t and/or for such vorrow, T/A M&M Appliance & Furniture Co. Jointly and severally the other and further orders and disposition as the Presiding Judge at the August 7 ' Terr wut R nih tY-FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-EIGHT AND 77/100 DOLLARS (#35.138.77) 1954 of Iredell County Superior Court may make herein. with interest thereon from date, and the costs of this action This the Vv J O5L. his the 12th day of July, 195 This the 20thday of July, 1951. Frank M. Armstron tesident dudge of Fifteent: Judicial District, ‘4 E772 ? 25722 NORTH CAROLINA N THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘orth C.rolina Vat — sia Iredell] Countv IREDELL COUNTY cai eoples Loan and Peoples Loan & Savings Bank, Plaintiff -vs- VS J MENT » 4. Thom; and wife, Mrs Me Ne fr. W. Morrow and Harold Winston ad Ur. J. R. Morrison Morrow, T/A M&M Ap,liance & Defendant Furniture Co., Successor to 8 & M Television & Supply Co., A Partner- Ship, and F. W. Morrow and wife, Violet J. Morrow, and Harold Winston “orrow and wife, Doris Jane Morrow, individually, . wiCLOMOS ! { ( { ( ( t ' ee wont we ee SEs Defendants tite wtitt e : . —— \ - THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk ° the jor Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the against the defendants F. W. Morrow and Harold Winston Morrow, T/A M & M Applian¢ Piipniturs ws. a - 9 . . . rt ersh: ' and Furniture Co., successor to 8 & M Television and Appliance Co., a partn a eee - 7 ~ = = > ee ie = F lar i ts ‘ . 4 yall’, and F. W. Morrow, Harold Winston Morrow and wife, Doris Jane Morrow, individ by default finals: AN iv ne 4 . i am . gummors AND IT aypearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and . . thor i j j j j P » + nower qaemuyr rer’. or 0 € issued in this action on the 24th day of May, 19545 it further appearing to the court that no ans ' e ‘ +oant i r t N ith a CO leading have + be or any one of them and no extention © AND IT further appearing to the Court that said summons together “S Nave been filed by the defendants or any Ob® ® : teh4 ich pleadings may : : , e and to f4 : : t time within which pj of said complaint were served on Harold Winston Morrow, T/A M & M Appliant © tile pleading has been granted and tha and e Pr Se ge ye 9 ee ee 24 furniture Co., successor to B & M Television and Supply Co., a partnerships ‘led has expired: 3 | $4 ‘plaint that the from the verified complain ws of And ; Harold Winston Morrow, individually, and Doris Jane Morrow on the 27th day d it further appearing to the court May, 195k; 7 f m e ase of f an express contract to pa ' action consists of the breach 0 Nine & 15/100 ($469.15) eae “ or other Four Hundred Sixty J _~ r rar. “ixed h AND IT FURTHER apvearine to the Court that no answer, demurrer, y the contract, namely the sum of within which adings ma} ' 4 r _ | eon from oaid, and which sum is ing S been filed by the defendants d ne tensi f time to file pleadin ars with interest ther from June 10, 1954 until paid, sah oa ) ; m M N. We ompso EC Wiuan WwW. T sson and wife, “rs. been granted and that the time withi ich vleadings m e filed has eXP Need by a note made by defendants N. We Thomp Jo Re Morrison; and en *ndorsed by defendants M. W. McCombs and vr. ae jaintiffs recover of the defendant the cost of this action July 27, 1954. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plai Ntiff have and recover of the defendants, N. W. Thompson and wife, Mrs. N. w, Th ’ Ompson, M, McCombs and Dr. J. R. Morrison the sum of FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY NINE & 15/100 ($469.15) Dollars with interest thereon from June 10, 1954, and the cost . 8 of thi action. This the 22 day of July, 1954. 25726 is jorth Carolina iestencias C. G. Smith 7 I t f the Superior Con Iredell County innie He Cooper and Carl M. Aluse yobbins, Trading and doing #5309 nyginess as Coopers Grocery North Carolin eee Store z . In the Superior Court, Plaintiffs Pde Nictednt. Iredell County Before the Clerk vs We Se Kivett, "Ere a D. White Kivett Oil Company, alii Defendant OF NON-SUIT eer ™h + nse comi and Dickerson, aes of the Suverior to be heard hefore the undersigned Clerk of the Superior to the Court that the plaintiff, through take a voluntary non-suit ordered, adjudged and decreed that the action of the action. 445787 NORTH CAROLINA IN THS SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Ninona Smi — se . aE s ~ ata SBS This C. G. Smith, Clerk of Je cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, £4) 60 i als ne si int was £1) Superior Court and being heard and it appearing that a verified complaint 4 lune ing that on dune 10, 1954 and summons issued on June 10, 1954, it further appearing he sun i , 95h, Summons and co;y of complaint were served on the defendant on June 2h, 1954s a° ; + psed action being on contract for rent due, that more than thirty days have e168 and no answer has heen filed, ordered It is now, on motion of Z. V. Turlington, Attorney for plaintiffs, . 5 wit ie ne ee and adjudged that Winona Smith recover of the defendant the sum of $423 «4 r of the d that th defenda™ interest at six per cent from May 1, 1954 and J. O. Turner recove ar + ce aAaLN : : ‘ . . an the sum of ©30.CO with interest from May 1, 1954 at six per cent IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | UPEH ree GaMay. Icke ete FIRST ee... Monday, A t, . 166) in oe see Monday, August 2nd, 195), 1954 NORTH CAROLINA ’ the following good and lawful men and women were duly drawn and sworn as IRSDELL COUNTY. r C ne Grand Jury to serve for the six months period ending January lst, 1955, to-wit: Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the ¢ F i oe ; ) 955, it: Ounty chomas Ue ie ’ W. V. Sisk and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. Cc, on the 2nd day of Hilderbrand * O. L. Brown Jessie M. Hobbs - x we August, 1954, at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. when and where His Honor J, C. Rudisi} ’ gverette Troutman L. G. Smith McNeely Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Fal) ’ le Term, i 1954, is presant and vresiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor and Pro » x, Hethcox - Robert E. Benfield r id aie secuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is pre telia Ce Rogers H. S. Metters A. Abernath ’ pre~ Le11a Ve : - es eo ’ ernathny sent and prosecuting in the name of theS,ate. J. C. Rumple, Hich Sheriff of Ire J. Le McNeely was sworn as Foreman of the Grand dell County, is present and opened Court by order of the Court. J. B. Goforth was sworn as Officer in charge of T >. Ry 2. Hi Sheriff of ; i J. ©. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court t The following were sworn as talesmen jurors for the week: the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for ', 5, Alexander 54, First Week, to-wit: nd for a Grand Jury to serve for a si , >, Souther hs period ending January lst, 1955, to-wit: _ a6 740 ABN & NON-SUPPORT Hethcox i. Sisk Cecil C. Sarueiie th rs Mayoderry A. Smith nichard Danner anuel Shoemaker , Judgment comolied wit! “ Levan * b T O¥ gE. Levan J. D. Oliphant ASSAULT wI Samuel Wilson stat Judgment ied wi and ordered taken Fox T. Mayhew rremryor nryv so TT rT ] . V , ** ASSA LT Vill URBAVLI WAT! Defendart called and Holthouser T Hugh L. Holton Everette Troutman Thoras G. Mills ae t ABN AND NON-SUrroOnt! i ” ; 3 . Qn ~~ + + vrents re » he Rot ort Be Renfield ’ It is orde -ed hy the Cour ha ' ayme a © e oe : r t Defendant according to the Judgement of this made by the Defendan cording ; 4 jn Cf ic YAsoret at + ‘ Court, or the Defendant 1s to 9¢ in his Cou at th next Term. L. Knight L. Hinson iy T vi j Be Le Murphy ie aes Souther : RN AND NON-SUPPORT » op ° J. S. Alexander P, South ed by ¢ ABN AND NON " : te Mayoerry, Fred W. White, G. H. Holthouser, R. nes were excused ' ' Alias Capias. Doctor's Certificates, J E r d by James &. Levan, Miss Charl; Pacem Bhs , Sloan were excuse , lie Faye Murdock, Alex Ross, C. DRUNK & DISORDERLY the Court. . Alias Capias. H. F. Moose was excused by the Clerk. W. H. Davis, out of County. RE OF LIQUOR ON PROPERTY : {ANUFACTU PERMIT MANUFACTURE OF ton order. sanford A. Smith, non-resident iy Continued u A. A. Cashion, not to be found. PS ana pe me & 5 .- =. - ae i : al . ial a . , Pm ~ = ~ = . Se : on aaa ail - z SS SST ee ere Sor is = eS eonaeaee ~ aamameny x - een ~ ; ; ane —— : ee ee ae ne r “~ 2 = - es . - a ie a Seta 3 x * na oH a co es ~ oe . a ~ . — - A Re . Pam - a “No. 1775 State vs Cameron Harrison Hayes “No. 1831 State vs Reath Taylor “No. 1831 state vs Reath Taylor YNo. 1858 iItate VS Raymond Saunders Spann ia No. 188 State ve "No. 1945 State rs Charles Henry Knox "No. 1987 otate vs David Bailey IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM Mondav, August 2nd, 1951," 1958 MANUFACTURING LIQUOR Continued under former order, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant Called & Failed, Jud is a Fa & Capias. udgment Nisi So; ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON It is ordered by the Court that the entry here tofore made, be stricken. Continued under former _ order that the Defendant pay the cost of Capias. pay t of Capias, DRIVING DRUNK Alias Canias. FALSE PRETENSE ii > PRET? FALS& rRETENSE Continued under former order, POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant Called & Fa and Instanter Candas. Failed. Judgement N ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON a d Continued under former order. Defendant Called & Failed. Judgment Nisi 9° Fa and Instanter Capi rOSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Alias Cavias. DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED sed te [The Court finds that the Defendant has ae ert’ comply with the Judgment of the Court. It 18 the fit by the Court that the Defendant pay $25.00 on v” and cost of the Judgment of the Court, now an, balance of said cost and fine by the November © this Court. BAST ARDY Continued under former order. ABN AND NON-SUPPORT Instanter It is ordered by the Court that an witness 39 Subpoena be issued for the Prosecuting the custody this case. The Defendant is ordered in of the Sheriff. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 195) Monday, August 2nd, 195,° DRIVING DRUNK _dudgment of the Court is that the Defendant confined to the Common Jail of Iredell County for period of SIX (6) MONTHS ) work “Noe 2001 State vs : Jimmie Kirk Morrison on the roads under the Supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Th sent 1S suspended for a period of TwO (2) YEARS following expressed conditions: That remain of general good behavior for said time, that he surrender Clerk of the Superior Court and the on the period of Clerk is to the Motor Vehicles Department at Raleich. N. C. to be revoked as provided by law, that the Defendant Dav a fine of 2100.00 and the cost of this action. Forfeiture on the hond is hereby stricken out. oO ae ee es es ee ee los. 2045 & 2OLE FORGERY: FORGERY State Judgment has been com: vs is ordered off jene Marshall Roberson vtate we 10 Oger 7 vee jreland NO. 2104 State vs car ames “+. Gilleland rw hy the Grand Jury in R A True Bill is returned Court with 1@ members present. ue open “onnny Lazenby STaTe Ap « SUPERIOR COURT “ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ee IREDELL counry August 2nd Term, 1954 a mu DORaENTs That Johnny Lazenby THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: Tha 1954, with force 7 th day of July A. D. te of the County of Iredell, on the 10 unlawfully, wilfully, e Charlie Bailey contrary to the 7 feloniously, and of ‘rm, at and in the said County, “lice aforethought, did kill and murder on orovided, and against the peace and t t orn of the statute in such case made and ‘HO, to be assiened to work on is sentence the Defendant his driver's license to the send said driver's license to the Safety Division of IN THE SUPERIOR couRT - IN THE SUP UR FIRST WEEK --------AUGUST TERM-----195), FIRST WEEK | re totes tes Monday, August 2nd, 195, Monday, August 2nd, 1954" a dignity of the State. ‘No. 1994 SPEEDING et ror Defend Y ‘ Ae M s State shi fendant Called & Failed. Judement Nie: ae i vci Fa & Capias Instanter, udement isi jilliam Darcla Bunton Those marked X sworn by the undersigned foreman, and examined bh Defendant through his Attorney, Mr. John McLaughlin, enters a plea of Guiltv to Speedine in excess of 75 mph. wi ‘No. 2106 State vs A TRUE BILL Gwyn Edward Staley irand Jury, and this bill found WR ii alinani teh pecignrie nent Judgment of the Court js that the Defendant + 2 +} ry : T a ; ila ; oe confined to the Common Jail of Iredell County or a period of SIX (6) MONTHS. to be assiened -tiwts \ c we b t A to work on the roads under the su ervision cf tne otate Highway and Publie Works Comrission. his sentence is suspended for a period of "wo (2) Years on the followine conditions: That he be of good behavior for said veriod of time that he not violate anv of the laws of this otate and especially not violate any s;eed Jaw, that he pav a fine of 3200.00 and nav the that 1€ not overate a motor yeh (4) Months, license +n J. L. McNeely Foreman of the Grand Jury pe) j BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY = ‘ : Nettie tees 2 ee ae enter re i. Pattiey, enter plea of Guilty to Forcible trespass. The State accepts said plea. Judgment of the Court is that the Defendan: be confined to the Common Jail of Tredell County vs for a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, to be assis: of Six to work on the roads under the suvervision of the eeepe SSE Se SePer een oF State Highway and Public Works Commission. This i nines cs ae sentence is suspended for a period of Three (3) ‘No. 2107 RECKLLOS DRIVING Years and the defendant is hereby placed on pro- state ‘ol Fros With Leave. bation under the surervision of the North Caro- ” lina Probation Commission and its Officers, sub- ayn Edward ject to the vrovisions of the laws of this State and the rules and orders of said Commission, and its officers, with leave that the execution might be praved at any time during the period of proba- tion. It is ordered by the Court that the Defent- ant pay the cost of this action. es snr me ee ee ee ee ee ee = ee No. 2122 ly State vs Isiah Hill De fendant Kestler, waives ters a plea of 5106 Vt, 4 ‘ . . Judgement « be confined to t! for a pertod of ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee c SREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a :lea of Guilty to Forcible Tresvass. The State accepts said plea. Judgement of the Court is that the Defendant he confined to the Common Jail of Iredell] County for a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, to be assigned work on the roads under the supervision of the Highway and Public Works Commission. This 1tence is suspended for a veriod of Three (3) and the defendant is hereby placed on pro- on under the supervision of the North Caro- Probation Commission and its Officers, suo- to the orovisions of the laws of this state the rules and orders of said Commission, ane its officers, with leave that the execution mi" he praved at any time during the period 0! . tion. It is ordered by the Court that the Defenc ant pay the cost of this action. assigned to work sion of the State ission. his ser of Five (5 ) v, ars oY That the defendant remain of : l 0 S ed > . esl ee eee z 2 - ‘ { he not violate anv ct the laws at THat he follow some regular and gainf ment, that he pay into the Office , » £90 Surerior Court the sum of #176.' ed by the Clerk to the De fendant's Hill, to repay him for the money said payments to ! made at tl oer month, the first payment } fore the 10th day of ust, i and a | oayment each month thereafter * before : 10th dav of each month until the said s m of $172.00 is paid in full, and ;ay the cost + ; ats . — Upon failure to make anv of the afores the clicitor AUL <a ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee MURDER oayments as herein set out, Continued for the term. ) authorized and directed to issue capias and ve commitment at any subseavent term Cc his Ou to out the prison sentence intc Defendant is ordered to appearay weer : + + > c 1} Vv Term of this Court to show that he has fu Omi ad wi r f this Court. eomolied with the terms Oi Uni: rt. i sig The $107.00 impounded shall be disbursed ; - ¥ pibss : ay ¢ . rn , 14 to the Prosecuting vitness, Frank Hill. effect ‘ The ‘ the Novert er uN NK FAIL TO SHOW DRIVER'S LICEN DRIVING DRU t . . > Continued. ee re ee es ee ee ie ee a ee ee ee ee ee ee ee James Groce Harwel] ' W-M-33 3 ce : — State vs “No. 2110 DRIVING DRUNK ‘mest Curil MeCr . N i} id mM acken state Continued. ee vs Benjamin Odell Wellman C-M-28 STTATY HIT AND RUN: DRIVING DRUNK Cee eee | These cases are consolidated for pur;ose oO! Trial. ar ; ie il rr iatefondant Haroun ee ee " ~ hare and empanelled os nee “ie b: E> ecmtot Ray v oeres so: aes Rossevel ison Cecil C. See aiiherd Danner Same] “Wilson IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM IN THE SUPERI Monday, Aveust 2nd, 1954 + 1954 FIRST WEEK Pt ba Monday, ! St 2nd, 1954 105) / J “No. 2024 2035 eee Me ’ mp 7 m 2033 2034, ’ BREAKING, ENT RING ROD AY STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT = 2037, 2038, 2039, te ft: weaaeaa = LARCENY SOUNTY OF IREDELL & 2040 be combined in all cases, “ ww State 3TATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ohn David Lambert ~ , Lourt that the VS ORDER DONALD WILSON SHERRILL This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the August 1954, Term of ° of Iredell County Superior Court before the undersigned Judge Presiding - 9 the defendant, Jonald Wilson Sherrill, having been returned to court as a violator Of probation me a report of said violations being made to the Court by Tom rresnell, State Probatiy Jfficer, whereupon the Court finds the following facts: That at the January 1954 Term of Iredell County Suverior Court before the Hor- orable J. A. Rousseau, Ju Presiding, the above named defendant entered a plea of king, Entering & Larcey, whereurcon the Court sentenced months in jail to be assigned to work under the surer- e Highway and Public Works Commission, this sentence being sus- sended and the said Donald Wilson Shwerrill was placed on probation for a period of chree (3) vears, under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission ari its officers under the conditions of probation, that as s;ecial condition of robation ordered by the Court, the defendant shall pay the cost of this action. Court further finds thatthe defendant has violated conditions of probation a *ollows: (a) He has violated that condition of probation which says he is to avoid it jurious habits as shown by the fact that he has purchased and consumed quantities ¢ alcoholic beverages at different times. (bo) He has violated that condition of probation which says he shall be of seneral good behavior as shown by the fact that the Police of Mooresville at rumsil 4 _ ; . » . eyrharces: simes have found this defendant cresent when they were called for various disturos ‘ : t at has violated the laws of Narth Carolina asshown by the fact that 3 =e 65 yor VW : r ) ; ‘ wilson -erm of Mooresville Recorder's Court, the probationer, Donald a fine and cos: 9 3 . 2 olead guilty to the charge of public drunkenness and paid - =. gatthe Ly rk +8 He has violated that condition of probation which says he shall wo . th for the at suitable employment as shown by the fact that he has each month f months reported that he is not working. ° +4 i prova This Honorable Court takes a recess unti/ wis meee of ‘ ; $y nt of PF . NOW, THER is ordered and adjudged that the former judgme te o be ass? , » 9330 ofclock A. M. = 6 ee Ee 4 AK reat bar + - ; t 7ion oe revoked and that the said sentence of twelve (12) months in jail jgsion 2d to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Comm we Pawn - : ed. heretofore suspended is ordered into effect and commitment ordered issu J. 6. Rudisill UDGE This the 2nd day of August, 1954. SSS a ee ee No. 2056 State vs Philipine Clark C-F-32 re _ 2H 37 r) 7 Cc ay! 4 waif + at ouvtate VS N33 . ‘J 2 > Ja1$S . enxins Sea eee = i ——- “Nos. 2130 & 213] State Vs larold Douglas Moore W-M-16 “Nos. 2130 & 2131 State vs Harold Douglas Moore W-M-16 N THs SUP&KIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 1954, This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesd & - es ay Mo : rnin jugust 3rd, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. ee eee ee <—_— os = a > << oo e<€o so Tuesday, August 3rd, 1951 POSSESSING TAX-PAID LIQUOR AND pip SELL Defendant enters a plea of Guilt Judgement of the Court is that tae a confined to the Common Jail of Iredell C period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS and assi at_ the Women's Division of the State Bri Raleigh, N. C. to serve said term. This 5 is suspended on the following express “aa, That the Defendant shall not possess Se mit on the premises where she resides or — she works, any intoxicating liquor or beveram that she remain of good behavior, and that eh’s a fine of 550.00 and pay the cost of bath terion Upon information to the Solicitor af ae a that she has violated anv of the conditions of th aforesaid suspension, he is authorized and direste: at any subsequent term of this Court to pray capiss and commitment to put the Prison sentence into effect. fendant >¢ Ounty for a d to work Son at SELL TAX=-PAID LIQUOR Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgement of theCourt is that the defendant be confined to the Commer Jail of Iredell County for ; period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS and assigned to work at the Women's Division of the State Prison at Raleieh, N. C. to serve said term. This sentence to run concurrentiv with the sentence in No. 2056. AID & ABET IN DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his Attorney, Mr. Fred Hasty, enters a plea of Guilty to Public Drunkedness. Judgement of the Court is that the Defendant ;27 a fine of $20.00 and pay the cost of this action. NG NON-TAX PAID LIQUOK Defendant throueh her Attorney, Mr. J. & Lewis, enters a plea of Guilty to unlawful possess ion of Non-Tax Paid Liquor. Judement of the Court is that the Defendant ° confined to the Common Jail of Iredell County fer a veriod of FIFTEEN (15) MONTHS and assigned to work at the Women's Division of the State Friso, Raleigh, N. C. This sentence is suspended mS Five (5) Years on the following expres: the Defendant be of good beha’- £ +he a ve 9 eriod of conditions: That ior, that she not violate any of the laws 0: State, that she not vossess, drink or deal in an beer of any kind, including wine or liquor durné said veriod of time, andthat she pay a fine 3300.00 and the cost of this action. Upon information to the Solicitor that she has violated any of the condi of this Cos" tions of th : irecte’ aforesaid suspension, he is authorized an aoe at anv subsequent term of this Court to a ny . 3 ify and commitment to put the prison sentence effect. ENTERING & LACE BREAKING & ENTERING: BREAKING, Mr, We Re Defendant through his A+ torneys © sible tres Battley, enters a plea of Guilty to for pass, which plea the State accepts. aout LARUE? BREAKING & ENTERING: BREAKING? ENTERING & True Bills. ° oT) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 105, State Ss +, G. Sherrill “jos. 2132 & 2133 State vs Je J. Raby ‘No. 2104 State vs James E. Gilleland ‘No. 2105 State vs Johnny Lazenby “No. 2102 State vs Clyde Junior Bustle “No. 2079 State we Oglee (None) Lane fa. ‘ 7 (None) Thomoson ttie Campbell Turner enn (None) Campbell ‘ C. Sh r4 yepeshe?? i1d Tuesdav, Aucust 3rd, 1954 FORGERY ! A True Bill. ’ RAPE ENT TO True Bills, >< < CRIME AGAINST NATURE: ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT MUM | in- { LARCENY OF AUTC A True Bill. | | I eI 7 wa | Continued. It ordered he Court that | Detainer be issued. { | SELLING AND POSSESSING LOTTERY TICKE | De fendar thro ck their ttornevs, Laugh] } anc attleyv, enter a olea of Not Guilty. i he three case ar conscolidat f tk } coseod trial. ’ Jury sworn and emoanellé as follows: ' Cc. F. Fox Barl T. Mavhew } J. &. Grvder . A. West } Fred Snow . S. Alexander ' O. P. Souther Mrs. J. Orvillé nte ) Rk. R. McNeely Jo C. McNeely ) Sherman Mitchell Carl Robbins } FORGERY : | Defendant through his Attorney, W. K. Battle { enters a plea of Guilty to passing a Vorth] ) Check. ie { Judement of the Court is that the De fenda t } confined to the Commor Jail of Iredell vounty fC } period of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, and assigned to } on the roads under the supervision of the State ) Highway and Public Works Commission. This se | is suspended for a period of Five (5) Years ujon | following conditions: that the Defendant s 211 } main sober during said period © core re na } he not drink intoxicating beverage of on Se : uw 4 heer or iau at ne work é& some ) cluding wine, beer or liquor, i ee Yn sn not neaced gainful employment and when not engaged on said job, he shall | children, not loiter on | with his family, that he earnings for the support family, and that he pay use the ;roceeds of his and maintenance of his the cost of this action. ) FORGERY . ‘ efendant throug t veiall a plea of Guilty to passing a Worthles Check in excess of $50.00. Judgment of the Court. confined to the Common Jail o period of EIGH on the roads unde Highway and Publi of this action. lw with aentenc® der the supervision of the State c Works Commission. This sentence tn “No, 2124. —_— oe ee he at home with his wife ar the streets, but be at home ro id his Attorney, W. RK. Rattley, is that the Defendant be f Iredell County for a TEEN (18) MONTHS, and assigned to work Pay the cost is to run concurrent- __ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST Mee Cie TERM, 195), IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 3 FIRST WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM. 105) Wednesday, Aueust hth, 105, siden. tienes eS w ‘No. 2105 State vs Johnny Lazenby C-M-22 ‘No. 2050 & 2051 State vs Atwell Ulysses Icenhour “Hos. 211i & 2115 State VS James Mason Faires Nos.2123 & 2124 St ate "hornet wre This Honorable a 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. MURDER Defendant through his At enters a plea of Guilty to mM Judgment of the Court is confined to the State Prison torney, Mr. J anslauzhter. ohn Stroure that the Defe ndant } for a perio me be than THREE (3) YEARS, nor more t¢ Od of not Jes and assigned to work as peavinur tt AVE (5) Years,” DRIVING DRUNK: DRIVING AFTER LICENS Defendant Called & Failed, and Instanter Capias. E REVOKED Judgment Nisi Soj ;. DRIVING DRUNK: SPEEDING IN EXCESS OF 75 MPH It appearing to theCourt that the Defendant serving in the United States Army stationed int. It is ordered by the Court that these case oy continued until the November Term, 195k. - NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: RECKLESS DRIVING Defendant called & failed. Judgement and Instanter Capias. SPEEDING Continued for the Defendant. m™oOTPY iLMLUR ordered by the Court that this case be remanded to the Iredell County Recorder's Court. $m hash hare tv in down Cha: req) ested that the Court takes a recess until Wednesday Mornin This Honorable Court convenes according yorning, August kth, 1954, at Ao. 1994 State vs yilliam Darcla Bunton ‘No. 2128 state vs doward Allen Graham W=-M=-24 No. 2102 State vs viyde Junior Rust le i-Ne27 0, 2103 State vs “r"ne A St Alexander VaNe ‘llos 2104, Yhate vs Ja ” ‘ mes E. Gilleland to adjournment on Wednesday 30 o'clock A. M, ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee he ee ee ee SPEEDING It is ordered by the Court that the Sci Fa Judgment heretofore entered be stricken out. Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to speed- Ing 1n excess of 75 mvh. Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant be confined to the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of THIRTY (30) DAYS, and assigned to work on the roads under the suvervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, to serve said term. This sentence is suspended on the condition that he pav a fine of $25.00 and pav the cost of this action. One excress condition of the susrens e ion, fydement of the vourt is, that the Defendant surrender his driver's license to the Clerk of this Court be held by said Clerk for a period of Six AND at the end of said Six Months period time, the ( "-k 3s directed to return the fendant's license over to him, and that the Defendant sha not operate a motor driven vehicle of any kind upon the cublic highways 1 . o of the State of North Carolina for said veriod of Six Months time. TAIT Zoo Defendan* /A as was ss +hat +hea Sei } stricken out ana the case r + ) oraer. vetendant av +he dement cost SOERHTINA ) adath ws Defendant thro Rattlev, enters 4a hetween 55 . 4 el adement of ” a fine of A r¢ Defer lant ey It appearing to t! fourt h offence +ho Defendant's hiles. he having stated in Cour : ae a fs - ‘ re ¢ served more than five vears alre: for larceny of automobiles and ” a of age. Iydement of the Court is that the JUQEI ; Me os i he confined in ‘ he State rrison ° a us rm (7) not less than FOUR (i) nor more than SEVEN ) i we : s YEARS. and assigned to work as prov ded by law. LisAllwW, Ais eos "— ce Defendant FORGERY Defendant enters 4 ® ATTIR my “—s ent throueh his Attorney Mr. J. G. Lewis, ontaan : ples of Guilty o*% attempting to commit the ime as charged, which plea the State accepts. aE Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant be confined to the Common eg bo gel for 8 period of not less than FIFTEEN (15 =? 2 che RIGHTEEN (18) MONIHS, and assigned co Ee oe roads under the supervision o! the S and public works Commission. => S ape "i : f cee x es gt 434 “No. 2105 State vs Johnny Lazenby C-M-22 ‘No. 2050 & 2051 State vs Atwell Ulysses Icenhour “Nos. 2114 & 2115 State vs James Mason Faires x horneburg See - 1954, at 9330 o'clock A. ne a ee f a ee Sn. = Fo a ; (his Honorahle Court takes a recess until Wednesday Mornin IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM 195), Tuesday, Aveust Sed, 195, MURDER Defendant through his At enters a plea of Guilty to Manele Judgment of the Court is that the be confined to the State Prison for 6 nase than THREE (3) YEARS, nor more than FIVs” and assigned to work as provided by law John Stroy. **? ant be Od Of not Jes. E (5) Years ’ ee ee ee DRIVING DRUNK: DRIVING AFTER LICENSE Defendant Called & Failed, . and Instanter Capias. REVOKED Judgment Nisi So; > ere DRUNK: SPEEDING IN EXCESS OF 75 MPH st appearing to theCourt that the Defendant ; serving in the United States Army etatdenel to It is ordered by the Court that an ae continued until the November Term, 195k. a — <a NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: Defendant called & and Instanter Capias. RECKLESS failed. DRIVING Judgment Nisi Sei 3: Ope ntTNA YJ. aw VIN Continued for the Defendant. ie aiciacaniil tala memnieniaies LARCENY DY iInlLU It is ordered by the Court It is ’ that this case be remanded to the Iredell County necorder's Court. —_— << => A o—r meee ,eTTAA h6F ‘rT? , Ad ~« RUNs DRIVING DRUNK " Tose returned a verdict of Guilty in hoth char , téitmeimmen Oa etm Thad ant requested that the 9 he A ornevs O he Defendan yueste Nay ve , } nant } Si an e poled, where? on the ’ as oled and ¢3 ‘ ; : ss : 7 pakartes } answered that their verdict was Guilty in each ¢ as a rwesranr rore » th, Es Augus’ ” This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment yorning, August kth, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, “io. 1994 State vs William Darcla Bunton 149 ‘No. 2128 State vs foward Allen Graham W-M=-24 vlyde Junior Bustle i-M-27 late vs oe Alexander O- 2101 State vs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM Wednesday, Aucust kth, , me i ee i ee ee es ae ee a ee a ee ee ee ee — a ee = <a ee a —_— << <a <a ae ee ae a ee ee ee 1°51, 195), on Wednesday SPEEDING It is ordered by the urt that the Sci F Judgment heretofore wend : pe A a. Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to speed- Ing 1n excess of 75 mch. ; Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant be confined to the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of THIRTY (30) DAYS, and assigned — to work on the roads under the suvervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, to serve said term. This sentence is suspended on the condition that he pav a fine of $25.00 and vav the cost of this action. One excress condition of the sus:rension, fudement of the Court is, that the Def fverts license a” ee oe driver's license to the Clerk of endant surrender his this Court to be held by said Clerk for a veriod of Six Months AND at the end of said Six Months veriod of time, the Clerk is directed to return the De- erry 7. . m " - oe al +} + ‘ > sicense over to nim, and that ty fendant's Defendant shall not overate a motor driven waht Ff we kind 1 vais 14 : wave rehicle of any kind upon the cublic highwavs of the State of North Carolina for said veriod of Six Months time. VOI ILO i ” 10 L efendan* enort on noena afte vapias was issued. It is or ‘ the Court that the Sci Fa dement heretofore enter stricken ovt and the case continued nies ‘orme? order. Defendant .av the cost of the Ca: ias. nan or snd z Defendant through his Attorney, Mr. wW. 8. , — ee ee attlev enters a ea of 2 lty c oO y hetween 55 moh and 75 mph. lndement of the Court is that the Defendant e ‘ ‘ av a fine of $25.00 and the cost of this action. LARCENY OF AUT( Defendant enters a plea c sulity. : that this is the It appearing to Fo! yb 1 ’ + ehe r he Cou i —ffoann for stealing automo- Defendant's 1 offence for stealing autome hiles he having stated in Cc 8, n vears already ir saat that he ha ison } fs served more than ive ar Ff aytomoriles and is now « for larceny oO years of ae. Judgment of the Court is that the ° he confined in the State frison for a term of not less than FOUR (4) nor more than SEVEN (7) and assigned to work as prov ded hv law. Defendant woADe LLANO, FORGER } oa ies Defendant enters a plea of NOt UUlivy. ae ena — CRIME AGA through his Attorney Mr. J. G. Lewis, enters a ples of Guilty o* attempting to commit the crime as charged, which plea ae Oe acme Pr Judgment of the Court is that the ef - 2 i: confined to the Common Jail of iredeli Coun y 7 f not less than FIFTEEN (15) nor more an riod o! h EIGHTEEN (18) MONIHS, and assigned to oe SS roads under the supervision of the State Hig and public works Commission. a renin | | ; | i ii i ri ae ss ee Midi Christe setae te == nn : ae . ep meena or eee — ee ae ee ++ atellbet eas : wiincitie alot a a ; : - 2 ‘Z fe ete Pe ae ~ " x = = x 3 a s = ~ ge “4 he os be >, . pore = a os eee ” x — Sa i =~e- ate 7 —-= Re Bt If = 5 , = < ER See ened ee ‘No. 2119 State Vs James Lee Lam W-M-29 "No. 2042 NORTH CAROLIN IREDELL otate Vs ~ 4} ° herine vanerin Noot The defendant rraver the Cour No. 2092 State vs Herman Phif IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 1954, bert TA VA YON Y COUNTY en ait » enters a for judgment is : +he probationers, a recommendation ee ee ee oe ee ee ee ee cont he Probation Officer t have Mrs. Ue 195k. Wednesday, August hth, 1951 RAPE Defendant through his Atto Lewis & Mr. W. R. Battley, “a et Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled Earl T. Mayhew J. E. Gryder B. A. West de oy Alexander O. P. Souther L. B. York c. Fr. Howie Ray V. Orren T. C. Rowe J. E. Roueche Hugh L. Holton Cecil C. Barnette ‘No. 2094 Mr, 2: G, State ente nters a plea of Not Islah Thompson as follows: C-M- ‘No. 2095 State vs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1951, C-F- ARSON plea of nolo contendere. inued to the November Term, 1°54. In the mean- Charles Hutchins, defendant and make the Po m 4 the erm. November ty } LARCENY Defendant Jury sworn and Ear] T. Mavhew Je Be. Aw Nest Je Se O. F. Sovther L. 3B. F. Howie Ray V. Nowe J. £. Rouecne Hugh L. Holton Cecil C. Barnette — Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charge. Judgment of Court is that the Defendant be confined to the Common Jail of Iredell Coun for a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, assigned t¢ work or roads under the supervision a State Highway and Public Works Commission 0°" said term. plea of Not Guilty. empanelled as follows: J, E. Gryder Alexander York Orren + enters a . ve La Ge he the the ASSAULT ON inued for ASSAULT? Cont POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR FOR _ Ww. R Defendant through his Attorney, ©: wful Battleyv, enters a plea of Guilty to um - possession of Non-Tax Paid Liquor. Judgement of the Court is that the be confined to the Common Jail of Ire " for a ;eriod of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, and a” work on the roads under the supervie sion: State Highway and Public Works cs Pive sentence is suspended for a perio Se dons! Years on the following express cond’ ih the Defendant be of good behavior, t late any of the liquor laws or any the State of North Carolina, any liquor or intoxicating bever pose during said time, and that $25.00 and the cost of this action. Hattie Campbell Turner IN THE SUPERIOR COURT _ WEEK AUGUST TERM 195) Wednesday, August, Ath, 195/, FIRST SELLING LOTTERY TICKETS At the close of 5 t se of the State's eyj ; vate idence, the De- sondent through his Attorney's MeLaughlin ” wen makes a voluntary motion for a = “otion is allowed and th fendant done e Defendant It is ordered by the Court that the found on this Defendant he turned over. Defendant's Attorney's to pay ther for services. . on NY ie NON-oult. Se ee ee ee ee ee ee SELLING LOTTERY TICKETS Foy + + ra) } a“ \ ‘ T } : wee endant through her Attorneyts MeLauchlin Pattlev, withdraws the rlea of Nolo Contendere and enters a clea of Guiltv. Judgment of the Court js that the Defendant oe confined to the Common Jail of Iredell County Lr a : . me, “* © . vies. ; aes = aheoe : or a ;eriod of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assiened to work at the Woments Division of the State frison at haleigh, N. C. to serve said term. This. suspended for a veriod (5, Years upon the following ex: res: conditions: That of good behavior, not violate any of the laws of the State of North Carolina, especially the Lottery Law, that she do not any lottery tickets equipment of arv kind on or about nsion, and that she and ,ay cost of this sentence is of Five bien Vin tn a the Defendant he thatshe be rmi t or her remises during said period of sus:e » hhh mh : C De ° tne SA ee ee ee Ee ee Tm OO ,TAIA ¢ a TOTTSpVv TTA v VUsISOILNG LULISN! LUG -d at Defendant through his Attorney' & Rattlev, withdraws the and enters a plea of Guilty. of the Co the Common Ja! f TWLEVS (12) } unaer s McLauchli lea of Nolc onte ndere Judement rt confined to for a period o to work on the roads State Highway and Fubl said term. This a period of Five (5) Y he ) ervi a nm & " «(C+ sOmm1SS5 10! C ic Works serve sentence is sus,.ended ears upon the fol That the Defendant that he q ° ~~ express conditions: rood behavior, not violate any < laws of the State of North Carclina, esvecié the Lottery Law, that he do not ,ermi lottery tickets or equipment of about his cremises during said pension, and that he ;ay a fine pav cost of this action. tickets and paraphernalia the eases 2091, 2095, & 2096, held by the Sheriff of this County, to be livered by the said Sheriff to the Federal authorities who have made the request that they he giver the custodv of the same. The money, — other than the $500.00 taken off of Thompson, is confiscated and the Clerk of this Court is order- ed to cav said funds intc the reasurer of lre- dell County to be disbursed by him as the law provides. } rine Lowin : > pe ¢C f the The raid in received in shall be de- oe ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON? PAID LIQUOR Defendant throug & Rattlev, enters a These two cases a of trial. Judgment of the confined to the Comm POSSESSING NON-TAX h his Attorney's, McLaughlin olea of Nolo Contendere. re consolidated for purpose Court is that the Defendant be on Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and er os sents a f sion of the ot : under the supervi week oe en Works Commission to serve said ic Highway a e065 the same judgment to run con~ currently with the aforesaid sentence. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---------~ AUGUST TERM, 105, FIRST WEEK AUGUST TERM, 195), Wednesday, August &th, 195, 74, Wednesdav, August hth, 1905/7 GRAND JURY REPORT AUGUST TERM, 1954 natter is to let the matter be continued for final judgment until the November The Grand Jury found true bills of indictment on all cases EXCePt one pre term, 1954, and to permit the defendant to return to her mother, who lives in sented by the Solicitor. taylorsville, Alexander County, and that she shall appear hack here at the Qecianas Committees visited and inspected the following County Properties: term, without further notice, and in the meantime the Court is asking that the County 0082 probation Officer have Mrs. Charles Hutchins, who supervises the women probationers, At the county jail we found the following prisoners: Seventeen white male to make a complete and thorough investigation and direct this defendant as to her y colored male, one white female, making a total of twenty-six orisoners conduct and procedure. ' : . : ° TL 2 t , We found the jail and all equipment in excellent condition. This the drd day of August, Also a sanitary rating of 98% was noted for during the vear "53 and '5,, County Home At the County Home we found the following inmates: White female, 15, male 16, Colored Male £, Colored Female 46, making a total of 13. Also we the following prisoners, White male 2, colored male 3, colored female 1. We found the entire premises of the County Home in fair condition. Prison Cam: to be in excellent condition, with a total number the Frison Camo include a new cook stove, a three compart- in good condition. vOurt nouse the repairs recommended in Grand Jury report We recommend the following repairs: Painting eal aaa 7 | i Es new drain for the colored Farm Agent's Office. a . + former grant urv have not irs recommended hv the Ee ‘ecommend that thev do so. he Welfare Building in good condition. are needed in the Clerk's Office. ee } S nd roverent in thea ianit orial service in the Court House ane sa n of this improvement. other departments in good condition. J. L. McNeely Foreman ‘No. loge | er ce ¢ © , 2 : = NOR CH CAROLINA ' T nr SUPERIOR CO TERM, 1954 | | see Gs Thursday Morning, August 5th, IREDELL COUNTY Gl 1] ‘his Honorable Court takes a recess unti NVA State lor / vs *%9 at 9330 o'clock A. M. y yo is Sf tera Wanda Jean Henderson . This cause coming on to be heard and being heard upon an appeal from th —<mbCE PRESIDING order of the Recorder's Court directing a prior suspended sentence ” wii . er- effect, the Court going into the matter and have the Probation officer make © o handle this tain investigation, theCourt is of the opinion that the hest way © Psd Se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 105), IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Thursday, August 5th, 105), FIRST . Fay a7 AUGUST TERM, 195/ ursday, August 5th, 105)" This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday Morn ‘No. 2119 State Defendant through his Att aa Lewis M i ~ , wad &. W. R. Battley, withdraws his vlea ' Not Guilty and enters a Slea of Guilty to Assault on a Fem i s U male, which ple ei souaute. ’ ea the State Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant oe confined to the Common Jail of Iredell County or a period of TWO (2) YEARS and assigned to ; work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Publie Works Commission as provided by law. a od ill It is ordered by the Court tnat Dr. T. V Goode he allowed the sum of $10.00 as an ex ert witness fee, ee RAPE ing, August 5th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. eid A Mh ae aie Lee Lambert ; q-M-29 CONTEMPT OF COURT Defendant throuch his Attorney, Mr J.G Lewis, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere =o This action, by agreement, being tried the Affidavits of the State's witnesses and the Defendant having tendered a plea of Nolo Co ‘. tendere, and the affidavit of the Statets on nesses showing no wilful intet on the part of the Defendant, but that what was said and don was done as a friend of the man for whom he , was Speaking, and the Court finds that there no wilfulness therein, but that there is a NRT VIN violation of the law, it is therefore ordered ‘No, 2113 DRIVING that the Defendant pay a fine of $25.00 ang state pay the cost of this action. vs 5 Math Robert Dewey Matherson “No. 2047 State vs Grady Starnes ee ee ee ee ee ee ee is s 4 AND RUN The Court finding as a fact that this is No. 2118 a case where only property damage was done. this wate - > ’ rer amount ing to $21.00. The Court further 9 7 Lee Ireland inding that all damages caused hy the colli- mee See erelen Sion have been paid. _ _ dudgmentof the Court is that prayer for ¥ 02 Judgment be continued upon the pavment of the = 2103 cost of this action. state Npon the coming in of the verdict the Defer- ee dant moves to set the same aside for errors — Alexander assigned and to be assigned. Motion denied ard silica Defendant exce;ts. Upon the pronouncement of the Judgment the defendant again excepts and appeals to the Su;reme Court. Notice of apjeal given in open Court. Further notice waived. The Defendant is allowed 30 days to make u; and serve case on appeal, the State allowed 20 jays thereafter to serve countercase or file exceptions. Appearance bond in this case is set in the sum of $500.0C Avpeal bond is in the amount of 3100.00 or complv with the ctart +o 4 . oa «ar ros The Defendant ry + + . ,07 ar Oo 932 lbidorent of _«< O 1 tO sd of al ee, a ee ee a ee a a } i ! } } ! ! { i ! { ! t } ' ( \ ! ! ‘ ( t ' DRIVING DRUNK Judement of the Court is that the Defendant he confined to the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned ‘ work on the roads under the su,ervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. (A sentence is susvended for a veriod of Two (2) fears on the following conditions: That the Defendant surrender his driver's license to" Slerk of the Suverior Court to be forwarded t the Safety Division of the Motor Vehicles De- artmrent at Raleich to he revoked as provided hv law, and that he pay a fine of $100.00 ane ay the cost of this action. Upon the coming in of the dant moves to set the same aside assigned and to be assigned. Motion Defendant exce;ts. Upon the , ronouncement 0 the Judgment the defandant again excepts oy $ ABANDON & NON-SUPT Ord Mak his bondsmen hereby a;yeals to the Supreme Court. Notice of af? Defendant avpeared his "sha eteanent ie ct Court. Further nee aee ee a . relieved and the Court gry te a ae The Defendant is allowed 30 days to ariewee rer tl the November Term of Co ba and serve case on appeal, the state Je 20 days thereafter to serve countercasé * i exceptions. Appearance bond in thi® fa is FORNICATION AND ADULTERY set in the sum of $500.00. Appeal oer h Case No] Pros With Leave. the amount of $100.00 (being combined wit No. 2111) or comply with the statute. +hoa ighway said terme Canias and commitment Defendant if the De fendant Sastern Carolina Training ocnot of rood ¥ ehavior and he ohed se laws until such time as he shall have charged on _ . +h r rar $ ¢ S and escape, then capias oon the Defendant and the above effect. service or upon escape. commitment to fate : verdict the Dete! sentence for errors denied - <a ee ee a i ee ee ee ae ee ee ee a ee i a ee ee ee a ee ae ee ee ‘No. 2067 State vs Gertrude Elizabeth Cooke W-F-21 “No. 2135 State vs Grady Alexander “No. 2132 & 2133 State vs Je Je Raby W-M- sourt, takes a recess until Monday Morning, IN THE SUPERIOR courRT FIRST WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 1954 Thursday, August 5th, 1954 : FORNICATION AND ADULTERY Nol Pros With Leave, RECKLESS DRIVING Defendant through his Attorne Mr, ' Bolmer, enters a lea of Guilty, >’ re Grant The Court entered a verdict Of Not Gui: CRIME AGAINST NATURE: ASSAULT WITH T 7 COMMIT RAPE ae 10 Continued until Novemher Term. onset SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM. 10 Monday, August Oth, los)” ooan yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT REDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 195, This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, jugust 9th, 1954 at 10:00 o'clock A. M., with Honorable J. ¢, Rudisill, Judge Pre- siding and holding Courts of this Fifteenth Judicial District, Summer Term, 195L, oresent. and presiding. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the i names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the second week of the August Term, 1951, Iredell County Suserior Court, to-w! -e slLe J, 0. McAuley G. L. Houston Frank H. Milstead (. &. Kates Me We. Brown C. Ww. Nestmoreland Thomas Murdock, < Roy Vinson Robert H. MeCov G iE. Keizer earce W. Miller Souther McAuley, C. W. Westmoreland, excus Souther, served first week. mm, W. A. Pearce Doctor's Certificates. not served, Robert H. McCoy, not served. Re Milstead, Mecklenburg County. Noods, Deceased. a ‘ 7 . + . ‘tute what shall hereafter the following men and women const uw Yivorce Jury #1" to Jenn: oe ‘ f > eee t “Anings, J. 3. Renegar, Wayne W. Miller, F. 3. ;' ; - a. z fur ‘ Ue He Harris Kates, Thomas Murdock, ore, 1 3, Parker, 5S. K. Moose, # yrose, Roy Vinson and M. W. 3rown. NO, 5703 ‘ames Lewis Brown vs. aney t r cy R. Brown Aucust 9th DIVORCE The Divorce panelled answers the follows: Jurv #1" being duly sworn and em- ‘ssues submitted to it as } IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK --------~ AUGUST TERM, 105), SECOND WEEK --~~--~ AUGUST TERM. 10 Thursday, August 5th, 1954 Monday, August Oth, los, ° 74 ‘No. 2067 State FORNICATION AND ADULTERY vs | } ! Nol Pros With Leave. Gm oxth CAROLINA “oe Elizabeth Cooke RSDELL COUNTY This Honorable Court convenes according t jou | 3 tO adjournment on Monday Morning, _—— RECEESSS ERIVENG Me st 9th, 1954 at 10:00 ofclock A. Ms. with # State Defendant through his Attorney Mr. ¢ B® iugust 9th, on vs Bolmer, enters a plea of Guilty,’ —° “tant Grady Alexander The Court entered a verdict of Not Gui} ea: lity Orable J. ©, Rudisill, Judge Pre- siding and holding Courts of this Fifteenth Judicial District, Summer Term 1954 i Term, 1954, resent and presiding. Secictielli lnctestieadt eminent wise arr nae ‘No. 2132 & 2133 CRIME AGAINST NATURE: ASSAULT WITH INTENT te 7 J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell Count ur State COMMIT RAPE INTENT To , y return ; = Continued until November Term. ranes of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as Ve Raby ‘ - 4 4 Se _— Mm che second week of the August Term, 1951, Iredell County Superior Court. to-wit: S into open Court the jurors for this 1. 0. McAuley G. L. Houston Frank KH. Milstead * 8, Kates h Brown C. W. Westmoreland a Thomas Murdock, Sr. Vi Robert H. McCoy Harris Jennings Renegar Perrar A. 3ryant Harry 0. Brotherton W. Miller Re He. Josev J, N. Morgan 7-0 Souther H. H. Evans Abner Overcash o eet Parker R. V. Wiegins Mrs earl Steele Moose Por s - —— ow Cansler s } j y 3. Grose Floyd Dean ~ ic a C. W. Westmoreland, excused by Court. Pee < * gk hag ieee a o . rei _ - ad served first week. loustor N. Aw Pearce Doctor's Certificates. el Wigeins not served, Robert H. McCoy, not served. a cee a ee k WH. me 1 ’ 1 ny ‘Re Milstead, Mecklenburg County. > VOods ° De ceased, the 7 ‘ : hat ahail h fter he termed the following men and women constitute what shall hereafter “a % . r H. Harris “vorce Jury #1" to-wit: C. Kates, Thomas Murdock, or., vs - enn 4 ' , fe Park 3. K. Moose, W. 3. Cansler “ng8, J. 3. Renegar, Wayne W. Miller, F. B. Parker, 5. K. Moose, , mS. fan : Ny Wy 2 J . wese, hoy Vinson and Me We Orowne C. 5703 ar ‘ig “a Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and em- ian ea oo ee hritt to it as mes Lewis Brown panelled answers the issues Suom ted to ee as follows: “Y &. Brown a , bu ‘ ‘ Oth Honorah] sourt, takes a recess until Monday Morning, Auvust 70% 10:00 o'clock A, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 195, WERK SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---~. 2. _ AUGUST TERM Monday, August 9th, 195, M 195) onday, Anerust Cth 195, . / pee No. 5703 ‘io, $776 } DIVORCE wi . ’ f £ / NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT she Divorce Jury #1" being q 1 ~@ xtty B. Lackey elled answers the issues submitted eee ore and empan- IREDELL COUNTY 4 vs ! mitted to it as follows: a on G. Lackey, Jr. ! James Lewis Brown VS. 5 @ voxth CAROLINA Mie one j ISSUES yORTH N THE SUPERIOR COURT N ‘ rR NTY = ancy R. Brown } @ epelL cov AUGUST TERM 195), @ xty B. Lackey, ! l. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the § J Plaintiff a 5 b oe 2 4 e ¢ h (* : . State of North Varolina for | more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? me ISSUES Answer: Yes B im G. Lackey, Jr., Defendant { [ o r 4 ; £ ° 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint’ ; a i intiftf . BePous i i ca : Answer: Yes 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the complaint’ ais tecaniah m wers Yes 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separ- ™ Sr ve ~ ++ x - + : : ° H ve ft j nt an } ale ¢ Su > : ate anda.art continuously for two years next preceding the Institution of this = he plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each action? other for two years next precedine the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for ORTH CAROLINA I H& SUPERIOR CC six months immediatelv vreceding the commencement of this action? IREDELL COUNTY Answer: Yes James Lewis Brown ! vs. JUDGMENT MATH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT nesety ereneey ia : ancy R. Browr | ASUSLL COUNT ANGUS ERM 19 erty B. Lackey, | his cause coming on to he heard before Honorable J. C. Rudisill, Judge pen ' tresidine yer the Ane Cswil Ter IO¢ Tl TT ; Ofetth ase hej rd Se ; . rresiding ov ne aug. Civil term 1954 Iredell Superior Court, and being heard | before said Honorable J. C. Rudisill, and a Jurv,. the following issues were sub- aed See ’ rv, le J Defendant ; mitted to the Jury: Has th. ianae ' . “7 sna for This cause comine to he heard before the undersigned Judge holding the 1. Has the plair f been a resident of the State of North Carolina fo: coming on to 5e neard . repular + asic : ; - ‘ ee es tory havine nswered nore than six months next -receding the institution of this action? ar term of Iredell Superior Court anda fu y, and the jury having answer¢ tial ne issy ubeitted ' the pleint! d against the defendant 2, Were the olaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint sues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and again: he defendant, wate 3 aopeare :,, ’ ‘ tne tnwante? qt it tisfactior .. Were the ,laintiff and defendant se-arated. andhave they lived separa rrears in the record: and the Court having investigated tc s sat 4 iN * \ , ‘ 7s fre ] inet . . ° 4 + r ce the ch ld : ainti-e ~~ a ie a : wie e ; t pting t rais re , and apart continuously for two vears next oreceding the institution of this “it and the conditions under which she is atten 0 orn t + . . : g #4 ¢ nit r e pversor action‘ © the marriage, and finds that the plaintiff is a fit and suitabl ‘i s 2 should he a, . tr f the infant child, Johr ‘he Jury having answered all of the said issues "Yes". d be awarded the sole care, custody andcontrol of th ’ . + Lackey IT] nd — he ef the defendant to make month- It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the | “» 441, and that provision should be made for t he 7 *ayments e bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant or itS care and support. ulo from IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered, considered and rf and the defendant be, and adjudged that the bonds of forever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vine YE tapes the inst ‘lage |} + . : ; j the defendant, Nancy R. Brown, and that the costs of this action be taxed ga” * heretofore existing between the plainti tame : b lute ° are ; Siatat’ s granted an abso hereby dissolved and set aside, and the Plaintiff is er the plaintiff by the Clerk. “VOree fy, ee “Fom the Defendant. f iinor custody and control of the m It is further ordered that the care, J. C. Rudisill ___—— g x Indee Pras! ai IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | IN THE SUPERIOR court : 4 SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 195, SECOND WES <o<--<5— AUOUST TERM 46s 44’'7'™ Monday, August 9th, 1954 Monday, August 9th, 1951," 7k iain child, John G. Lackey, III, be awarded to the plaintiff, and it ; “iff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant S directed that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50 00) » PIU. Der j 3 7° nD 2 J. Ce Rudi i month, beginning August 1, 1954, for the care and Support of said minor child, a Dat TRESS It is further ordered that the defendant pay the costs of this action ;' say st 7 3 mM ~ Mm 4 . ~ + WO OK oe ote oe = A NTS ae " resets / ~ | Be DIVORCE i J. C. Rudisi _ The Div Jury #1" he; | : ill orce Jury #1" being dul Ae —— 4 ‘ . ' yY Sworn and em- i JUDGE 2193 wn Holthouser 1} panelled nswe fee ae em DGE PRESIDT @ iloise 7 4 answers the issues submitted to it Be fellow: i "Seep e Fee 8 6 8 8 @ icmny Gilbert Holthouser ' / 4 No. 5780 ) DIVORCE ( The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and emoan- yTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Francis Melton Crump ) elled answers the issues Submitted to it as follows: ‘ VS. 1 RELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 195, William P. Crump ) jloise Brown Holthouser } NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERICR COURT VS. } ISSUES IREDELL COUNTY johnny Gilbert Holthouser Francis Melton Crump { { l. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Com lain VS. ISSUES Answer: Yes Nilliam P. Crump | 2. Have the plaintiff anddefendant lived separate and apart from each 1. Was the plaintiff married to thedefendant as alleged in the complaint’ cher for two vears next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes Answer: Yes 2. Has the olaintiff and the defendant heen serarated and lived separate 3. Has the plaintiff been a residert of the State of North Carolina for and a,art for more than two years immediately preceding the institution of this ‘xmonths immediately preceding the cormencement of this action’ suit? Answer: Yes Answer: Yes 3. Has the vlaintiff heen a resident of the State of North Carolina for viTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOk COURT a veriod of at least six months immediately prior to the institution of this USLL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 195 Suit “018 Srown Holtshouser } Answers: Yes vs. } JUDGMEN ‘Oamny Gilher+ Holthouser } VNORTU Cat T TAA TN TUE STIPRR TR COURT NORTH VAROLINA JN GRE OUP SI 1G ML ‘ : . 4 Lt +ho undersigned I 1dve io] jing the ‘nis cause coming on to he heard hefore e wna ¢ iea AGS ts? TT T VT AIT at T1r°AOm TrDYV OS) IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1954 ea ; : il a ee bular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answer! Frances Melton Crumo, in a : fendant b ‘ . . ‘oer : inst the jefendan Plaintiff " $8ues Submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and agair ’ | | QMENT 4% appears ; " ; i{nauired as to the fitness VS. JUDGMEN! appears in the record; and the Court, after having inquir | ‘ i finds eee ae h ines , trol of the child, fi William P. Crump ® plaintiff to continue to have the custody and con Defen d efendant t ‘ } le custody and t 4 far : : ‘ » that the sole cus ‘Tact that it is for the best interest of the child tha ; tne i FF ‘ - zz . the ylain Li . " ° ° . . * 4 the ; Vi) rol +}, . ss a lt ser he awarde ad Oo Un "his cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of of the infant child, Jeffrey Steve Holthouser, isill bonds of C, Rudisi++s Se tertile ' tudged that the bonds aii IT Is, 'HEREFORE, ordered, considered and ad judg riage hero+ Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Hgnor, di aintiff and the defndant be, and the ‘ ted . a 2 ‘ ‘ submitt ) | Jiadge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered to the issues °© ofore existing between the pl | | Plaintiff is granted an absolute Same et defendant, as § are hereby dissolved and set aside, and the to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the “vores e "Mie "om the Defendant. dy, care custody I o | F i ted the sole custody, It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bond bo ee ct , - er. and that the pial matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Frances Melton Crumd, trol of the minor child, Jeffrey Steve Holthouser, defendant, William P, Crurp, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and hs ae ie — Je Ce Rudisill o TIDE PRESIDING 448 A No. 5783 Navy Speaks vs. Jettie Shoemaker Speaks NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Navy Speaks, Plaintiff, Vs. Jettie Shoemaker Speaks, Defendant. 2. Did the defendant sevarate from the a separate and apart for a Voe Answer: res. 3. Has the plainti nore than six months next Answer: Yes. iff and period of two ff been a oreceding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 195), Monday, August 9th, 195), DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly elled answers the issues i F Sworn Submitted t and empan- © it as folloys, ee ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR coupr AUGUST TERM 195), ISSUES the defendant intermarry as allered jin the Cor- 1 plaintiff and have they lived years or more as alleged in the Complaint? resident of the State of North Carolina for the filine of this Complaint? JORTH CAROLINA I § SUFPSRIOR CO rr T TY ’ wt. IF AnMGVeaLL UU AUWUO) 4 + av yoeCaks, } saint 9 A , : , _ 7 Se J D I 4 + . shoemake Jc,eaks e shoemaker S:eaks, Def ndant 9 | S ca -Oring on to he heard and being heard at the August ‘erm, 7 , - ae f . er , t e411 Judge rre- suUperic -Ourt of i¢]1] Count hefore S Honor, Jd. C. Rudisill, dg idg ° ‘ [++ ( t t siding, and a jury, and the jurv having answered all the issues submitted to +ho > : on ° oo a Pa . noears 1n ve in the favor of the :laintiff and against the defendant, as fully appea zt is > therefore, mony heretofore existine same are, hereby dissolved, yorce from the defendant. This hetween the 9th day of August, \ Yn yf matri- ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds 0! and the the plaintiff and the defandant be, h ute di- and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolu 195k. Je Ce Rudisill Judge Presiding + % 7 erates 28 eS eS IN SECOND WEEK Monday, os 5785 th Odom Sherrill 4 ay ws vs. ; jesse LERoy Sherrill y0aTH CAROLINA aeDELL COUNTY wth Odom Sherrill | e Plaintiff VS. jesse LeRoy Sherrill Defendant } elled answers the issues THE SUPERIOR COURT cweseee AUGUST TER August th, 105), me ao DIVORCE The Divorre Jury #1" being duly Sworn and empan- Submitted to it as follows; ISSUES + Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the com- laint? : y Answer: Yes, 7 & db y + . Smet Pe hea y iq recinen> f thea State £ Nant} ‘arolina Has the plaintiff been a hona Sident c he State of North Carolina ‘or more than six months next orecedine the nting of this action? Answer: Yes. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived sevarate and acart from each other ‘or two years next preceding the neinz of this acticr Answers Yes. ATH CAROLIN: ne ee eee Ret? Arr stron 195, SVSLL COUN 4 IUDs 4 , - + h Odor Sherri]] | laintiff vs JUDG) my VS. £SSe Lenovy Sherri]] Def, ndant } "his cause comine on to Sill, JudgePresiding and a Sine “Ope Kved ws h rly Ser ved with process hv “OM tted to and answered by the 1. Were the plaintiff a “trlaint 7 Answer: "Yast 2. Has the plaintiff’ bo “ore ¢ , han six months next preced Answer : "Yes 3s Have the plaintiff and defendant 1 - 4 - ° ‘ OF lredel) County and it aj} — is cin 2s, be heard and being heard before his Honor, vs » , : f the Superior fury at the August Term, 1954, of tne o been earing to the Court that the defendant has pearl yr Uv vne b t r r tr ¢ ing issue aving been j i a sllowi ~ ive S ha pu licat 10 ‘9 a id My ‘ J jury: j eged in the nd defendant lawfully married as all t j for ride resident of the State of North Carolina na 'ide re the i j etion? ine the bringing of this act , each ived separate and apart from | tH A J q i Yt at nw ee a es =. = = = : Set ee is Ps Eas ee es eee A No. IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 195), Monday, Aucust Oth, 195), DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" elled answers the issues 5783 Navy Speaks vs. Jettie Shoemaker Speaks being duly Sworn submitted t and empan. oO it as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR coupr IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 195, Navy Speaks, } 4 Plaintiff, vs . Jettie Shoemaker Speaks, Defendant. j 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as allesed in the Cor- plaint? Answer: Yes 1 2. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they 1liy separate and apart for a period of two vears or more as alleged in Answer: Yes, the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for 3. Has more than six months next voreceding ) this Complaint? the filing of Answer: Yes. TORT PADKAT Tre , 6 , rT VORTH LVANULINA I 4 2 BiH LU vw ee ae ee -seeeroOm Mm OC) [IREDELL UUUNI I AUWJo!l Ib 4 4 — . —_ Yavy Speaks, ! as 7 riaintl 9 : ' 7 c+ Hm A VSe ‘ J vD I ‘ Jettie Shoemaker S:eaks, e Defen lant, ming on to be heard and being heard at the August Term, 17 Court of Iredell County hefore lis Honor, J. C. Rudisill, Judge ?re- , > . laaunsae vhmitted to it siding, and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted y in the in the favor of the claintiff and arainst the defendant, as fully appears 1” records e trie ‘ 1 . ° 3 } i mavr It. is, therefore, ordered, adiudged and decreed that the bonds 0 the mony heretofore existing hetween the plaintiff and the defandant he, and t + * . . + b ute di- sane are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absol yorce from the defendant. This the 9th day of 1954. August, . : l J. Ce Rudisild — Judge residing IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --... AUGUST TERM 195) Monday, August Sth, 195, ° DIVORCE The Divoree Jury #1" elled answers the issues 1o. 5785 uth Odom Sherrill VS» Jesse LeRoy Sherrill being duly sworn and empan- Submitted to it as follows: oat CAROLINA HSDBLL COUNTY ath Odom Sherrill ) = Plaintiff VS. ISSUES jesse LeRoy Sherrill Defendant ) Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the com- laint? " Answers: Yes. Has the plaintiff been a hona Side resident of the state of North Carolina ‘or more than six months next vorecedine the nzing of this action? - Answer: Yes, W } Sas : ; . aan 7 rete nd acart from each other nave tne plaintiff and defendar ! 2d sevarate and ar ¢ cn ot ‘or two years next receding thea y tine of n a act Cc Answers Yes. PTY aD AT +. I i \ OUR vt.n CAROLI 4 4 9 Norr . . aad 1 AWSLL COUNTY AJUUO. at, nl Odor one y a | laintiff VS. t Vd hs esse LeRoy herw ‘OV onerr 1] Def ndant ' ‘ haf His Honor, d. JU. a i . } . i efore § i TiVh ‘his cause coming on to be heard and being heard * the Suverior ludies , * see T OS of “sill, Judge! residing and a 4ury at the August ierm, 1] ing , fendant has been wrt of T ; ‘ourt that the defendan - Of Irede]] County and it appearing to the Court sha issues having deen S : following weerly Served with process by publication, and the following ~“Mtted to and answered by the jury: allezed in the i ‘ anf married as 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully “trlaint 7 Answer: "Yes" j t ; North Carolina for Pn nae ride resident of the state of N the plainti®*® bona » Ore ¢ ; ; ai of this action: han six months next preceding the bringing wa Answer 3 "Yestt , each ived separate and apart from 3s Have the plaintiff and defendant 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 195, Monday, August 9th, 195, ” IN THE SUPERIOR couR NT URT SECOND WEEK ------. aycygr TERM, 105, Monday, August Sth, 195) 7 , 7 Aw other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action ‘5790 . Noe 5 : a y0ath CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintire 4 REDELL COUNTY i ame Ik Answers: "Yes" Ruth Odom Sherrill, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the ‘ lanes Stanley Redmond, defendant, Jesse LeRoy Sherrill, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existin q : co between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, . | i oo ee And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact neh ayer? Pre cleene | t. that there is one minor child o sai mar iag ’ Jesse LeRoy Sherr tao Jr mn r nm to eard n nz hear t the , ern ( f dm riage e e Le y Sher: » Ye, who i : h : * . ° ° ‘of This cause coming on 40 be 1e% 1 an t i nas ¢ een i Vi ng witn iS Mm + 9 bs 1 +o , ince the separat ion 0 his I and € ilk nea dq a Ul Aucust Ie rm ] 51 : 7 | | 7 vil’, Dy } > thh other tk a nla n f Ss : fr f Ire © ; I nc a Super ior vourt oO 2d a1 Countyv ne re His H r C isi J 4 , - sides ONO! 7 J. nud) rae Indge parents; and it further appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact oe a that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to havethe custody and contro] siding, and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to i+ in of said minor child, and that the best interest of said Child would he served by the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully aovears in the re- being in the custody of his Said mother: cord; and it appearing to theCourt that there was born of the marriage of the ss sk, eid: eeiniieb ails di amie Gc sink Se ea aia claintiff and the defendant, Margaret Ann itedmond, January 12, 1948, Carolvn Fave a a lal ee edmond, March 2&th, 1950, andWanda Maria edrond horn Naverhar Ira . full and complete custody and control of said minor child, until the further order nn ne oe ae stad h P+h av r 3) 1069 arn } + +) int 2 : ied on the 2&th day of April, 1952, and tha he defendant herein has the care of this Court. ord yet Ff sai hi . nad it further ari + } j ad custodv of said children; and rtner appearing to the Court and the Cc Ind it ie #1) . ' ; i ; ; And 1t is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this actior *inds as fan+ that tho Aoe jant fie oa £4% and esital } } inds as a fac nat tne defendant is a fit and suitable person to have the cus- ‘ody and control of the minor ; Ia e o C By h h davof August, 195k. Se] 4 \ - iy iD ee ° ct ty ~ a. + ys 2 ~ . *arond, and that the best interest of said minors would he served by keine ra atei1} *he enetndyw nf +) : ad o } ’ f 3 ‘i a ‘ — Dae HTH CuStoay c neir mother, she heine found +c eq fit erson for +h custody in JUUUG WHI Nu 1 - Said minor children. } 7v . an "Na EROL I ntyose it is, therefore, ordered, adjudzed and decreed that the bonds of matri- ne ™* i VIVUNUS Me i ne 2 _ ne ; ; ie Divo urv " hej duly sw rpan- tony } ee are eae ., ; i The D orce Jury 1 eing 1] sworn and empan my heretofore ex sting hetweer the laintiff and defendant : and the same are ame St an] Sr 4¢ imond { elled answers phe Deedes Measles t dc besaae te $4 as follows! a l I 9 fi = ht ¥ . wla » . 4 ‘ o ie vs a ‘ ee : ered} Seolyad : a : ; Bia :, a le Mod tut vere imor reoy dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby eranted an absolute divorce oO! "any > defendan:+ 1 ‘ : a a n> verendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, i NORTH CAROLINA ™N TUR GIPRRTOR COURT uth | ; oe : a : . IN THE SUPER LOR GUUAI “Ayers Redrond, be, and she is hereby awarded full and complete care, custoay ry Y ‘ TT «* apr a REDELL COUNTY AIIGUST TERM 195] and . ' ; : 7 o drond Pi cee ee AW GUO! Mah 204 “Control of the minor children. Margaret Ann Redmond and Carolyn Fa veamond; by ‘ . Stk ‘* es . . ; Jar S ta V¢ r é mond \ hat th ; eo ; 2 bor — a i re ) Yaintit PP : “ the plaintiff pay to the defendant, Ruth Myers Redmond, eUU per montn 10! 4 la : | . a { ne Wi» . : » . ‘ - + + ran . : ‘ SU:port and maintenance of the said minor children, first payment to oe mad rs Larrea - A 1 i . 4 uiads i - sie ISSUES A On the 1&6 "rn + ‘ na we Lt ‘ay - Ben : : a "29, OC 320.00 on if ana uth ers Redmond ath day of August, 1954, in amount of $30.00 and 230. tedmond, ca ndant. | “ay of each month thereafter until further orders of the vourt. the custody and support of the Did t} tm the Com- ‘NiS cause, in far as it relates to 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarrv as alleged in the “ : a oe ‘hor chi ; ‘ : Children, is retained for further orders. laint? ind te «¢ bait y ¢ ste of this actior Anawer: Ye and is further ordered that the plaint:! Mundin iSwer's 1é@Ss. «0 | ‘ i sved *e taxed by the Clerk 2. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lives me this the Oth day of August, 1954. ear we , f : j ? fant Separate and apart for a ceriod of two vears or more as alleged in the Comp! Answer: Yes, " Judge Presiding His J. C. Rudisill ei } ‘ + . . 4 N a 3. Has the plaintiff teen a resident of the State of North Carolin a a a a mk ke ke oe ek KK OK ® more than Six months next preceding the filing of this Compliant? Answer: Yes. v No. 5792 Howard E. VS. Esther Pearl Wilson Wilson NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Howard E. Wilson VS. Wilson Esther Pearl IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1954 Monday, August 9th, 195, ~~ ) DIVORCE { The Divorce Jury #1" being dul elled answers the issues submitted y Sworn and empan- to it as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a 9 IN THE SUPERIOR couR SECOND WEEK -------- Auaugt oERy Monday, August Sth, jo5) 1954 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" bein answers the issues submit & duly sworn and empanelled ted to it as follows: gi ill IN THE SUPERIOR couRT 1EDELL COUNTY louise Hayer VS. yymond I. Hayer 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident , . > ) . : ff + O+ ’ Y : Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in complaint? of the State of North Carolina for Answer? core than six months next precedine the institution of this action? . . . . Vv the plaintiff and defendant separate as alleged in the complaint ert See ; Were the claintiff and deferdart ried lies and have they lived separate and apart from each other for two vears immediately 2. Wer che plaintiff and d sant married as alleged Yes. : Se . . . 5 iswers vreceding the filing of thecomplaint in the action? anew Were the plaintiff and defendant sevarated, and have thev 13 Answer: y 3 ; a 5 : : ad apart continuouslv for twe vears next v-recedineg the institution of oOlaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for ens To ' Se — ee action? the filing of the complaint in the action? Answer: , Te CARC LINA NORTH IREDELL COU? Howard his Honor, jury answer- . ecord. . : oe : erimane heretofore ordered and adjudged bonds of matrimony herete Yvon ‘ : 1. f the State of North Car tesae srehy dissolved laintiff been a c , plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby aissosvey, ef, oa : héuba £ is action? years separa- x months next preceding th nstitution of this a ? franted an absolute divorce on the ground of two vears = : sedi cy bilan e +n the comrolaint: dere the plaintiff and defendart married as alle ed in the compl action he taxed hv the Clerk as provided bv law. I ; Cilrl r) L@rmCe have thev lived separate were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and ha . ‘ - : e hie +4 n? Rudisill ‘tution of this actio oreceding the inst Presiding _—* continuously for two years next Judge Bes ; : ' : "Vos", Yurv havine answered all of said issues “1es that the bonds + ‘ ie sydged and decreed ~» “nerefore, by the Court ad judg ordered, ao ie e ever * Matrj tne 4 the defendant be foreve “‘rimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and i ines f the de- lisso ‘ vinculo from lved, and the claintiff is herebv granted a divorce 4 ae d against the “ant, Raymond I, Hayer, and that the costs of this action be taxe “aintire by the Clerk. this oth day df August, 1954. Rudisill Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 195, Mondav, August 9th, 1954 : Ne» 579k DIVORCE ‘ The Divorce Jury #1" being duly swo Avis W. Baker answers the issues submitted to it as Follows: melled VS. : Harry G. Baker NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court IREDELL COUNTY Avis W. Baker } vs. \ ISSUES Harry G. Baker } 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next vreceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action‘ Answer: Yes. {ORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT [REDELL COUNTY ivis W. Baker { hefore Hgnorable J. C. Rudisill, Judge Pre- * , a 7 o 7 ’ : ies ant that rd Aucust Civil Term 1954 Iredell Superior vou and ing heard + u , nefore said Honorable J. C. Rudisill, and a Jury, the following issues were Sub- : . $ far ] Has the claintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina +0 rore than six months next preceding the institution of this action: 2. Were the olaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint: i ehaw 13 eparaté 3. Were the olaintiff and defendant separated, and have tney lived 5¢! ° * : 4 +4 t is and apart continuously for two years next oreceding the institution of th action: The Jurv having answered all of said issues "Yes". , + the honds It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that fare . A ‘ $ nt < e Io! of matrimony heretofore existing between the olaintiff and the defendan ; from the ever dissolved, and the vlaintiff is hereby granted a divorce 4 vinculo : : , gainst defendant, Harry G. Baker, and that the costs of this action be taxed 48 the Plaintiff by the Clerk. This 9th day of August, 195L. Je Ce Rudisill_ ——— Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COU; SECOND WEEK -------- - ANGST TERM, 195) Monday, August Sth, 1954 DIVORCE The Divoree Jur elled answers the i io. 5795 ! { y #1" being dul » Winecoff Kistler 4 : & duly sworn and empan- { ' ari Ssues submitted to is as follows: VS. sjarence w. Kistler gat CAROLINA (REDELL COU NTY wrie Winecoff Kistler VS t ae ‘larence W. Kistler { -. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for ore than six months next preceding the institution of this action‘ Answer: Yes. 2, Were the plaintif*® and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3, Were the plaintiff and defendant seoarated, and have they lived separate and apart continuouslv for two years next receding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. QTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERTOR COU REDELL COUNTY arie Winecoff Kistler | an VS. { DGME darence Ne b stle Y ' This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable J. C. Rudisill, duage “Yoeias _ P - ; * _ a & we " y+ ric } e1r 'eSiding over the August Civil erm 1054 ire jell Suoeric Court, anda neard | tae eres rower the following issues wer ard before said Hanorable J. G. udis 11, and a Jury, che follow: to the Jury: . . j ‘ — f North Carolina 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state © NOI * ' . pmatituel f this action? Six months next preceding the institution of this 4 . : in the complaint: 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in 2 i - * yparav lainti f and e T a T e h ve Ut ey ived 3e € ; - d e idant S¢ par a ed , and ave h y - institution Ql nis action: “S apart continuously for two years next oreceding the ™ " the J\ Se . ot tt ury having answered all of said issued “Ye decreed that the bonds It is, dered adjudged and therefore, by the Court or the defendant be for- af “ Matr intiff and ‘atrimony heretofore existing between the olaintif j vi from the nted a divorce 4 vinculo m "ver di issolved, andthe plaintiff is hereby 8r@ anliiad be taxed ag Sha +hig action ‘end , -s of this ant, Clarence W. Kistler, and that the costs "e plaintite by the Clerk. this 9th day of August, 1954. J. Ce. Rudisilt Judge Presiding Pc 400 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT il SECOND WEEK wceneen= AUGUST TERM, 195; SECOND WEEK ----. ~-- AUGUST TERM. 0 t Monday, August 9th, 1954 Mondav, Aneust Oth, los,” 95k DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" elled answers the issues OB |v. 580 vark Me Honeycutt VS. ‘len Me Honeycutt DIVORCE a No. 5796 The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sw : bein elled answers the issues submitted to ¢ duly sworn and Sepen- orn and €mpan- Submitted to it as follows: : Andy Osborne Moose 1t as follows: vs. Minner Lee Moose <_< a <— e NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT q “gtd CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY @ sl COUNTY Andy Osborne Moose { @ ovark M. Honeycutt VS. } ISSUES 1 vs ! ISSUES ; JES 3 . ISSUES Minner Lee Moose { @ leon Me Honeycutt ) 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for | 1. Has the plaintiff heen a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answers: Yes. Answer: Yes. 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the Complaint? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as allered in the corslaint: Answers: Yes. Answer: Yes. 3- Werethe pliantiff and defendant separated, and have thev lived separate J. Were the plaintiff and defendant sevarated, and have they lived se;arate and apart continuously for two vears next preceding the institution of this wd apart continuously for two vears nex receding th nstitution of this actic action? Answers; Yes. A nswers Y es. ‘ITH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COU —— “> @e - 4 . oman LREDELL COUNTY (ONTH CAROLINA I 4 SUPERIOR COURT Woh YUU N ° - y rk V Han + ANIUGLL a awk. nonevcut { nm 1S indy Osborne Moos | Se } ws VS. 7 IDGMEN’ een M, Honevent? | Y >” 2a OoOSE L os } ae e ee jisill ic lis 2 "0 ne on to ‘ hear ere > nonorani . . ’ aa resid; — we ; Pope i ae cs vues men Cased dq} ne nis cause coming on to be heard before Hanorable J. C. Rudisill, Judge waeing Over the Aug. Civil Term 1954 Iredell Su or Court, and he ; saz j 4 . hai “ore [e Ban annd , nr ' a cas ee the Ffollowine iss 2S Ww - residing over the August Civil Term 1°54 Iredell Superior Court, and being © Said Honorable J. C. Rudisill, and a. » the follow heard hefore eata u ee t a Matto sso lamer he following issues were “ted to the Jurys neard nezsore Said Honorable J. C. Rudisill, and a Jury, the following | ' Irys > Mans he lina * = ted to the Jury: ie as the laintiff heen a resident of the State of Ne h srolina “¢ ( 5 tr ’ [ for “han 8j nrehe a ° a _f + f« aes ri? 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of Narth Carolina +0 ‘X months next orecedine the institution of th action } : : y Wane «} ei : a pica avriad as alleged in the complaint: more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2. Were he plaintiff and defendant married as alleg tne ¢ +} r ; xd sé arate + ; . . : r) inv: 4‘. ‘ o i ‘ rate nd have ner ] ved Ss 2. Were the ;laintiff and defendant married as alleged in the compla Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, a n ; : ‘tution of this actior Part, cont next preceding the institution ¢ , eparat im 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived s¢ ‘nuously for two years : eticr ™ . . ny " , : : . f this act) the Jury wt : d issues ‘les’. and a;art continuously for two years next preceding the institution of th jury having answered all of the said issue : 4 that the bonds on It te + sd n ‘ aA’ 1dged and decreed he Jury havine answered all of said issues "Yes". ‘S, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudge of he fare honas . Matwe P 4 the defendant e ior : . . t the ool atrimony har ei pe as ii aintiff and It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that Pretofore existing hetween the pla e the fare ®Vvan ’ wt culo from h j t be 10! " diss 4 ; . ‘ i ted a divorce a vincu of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant Olved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted — 1e me Ss ; tion be taxed against : : ‘ from th ‘Ndant. 1 , -s of this actio ever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo » helen M, Honeycutt, and that the costs Snat “ho rie 2 " agains’ ihintire by ene ns defendant, Minner Lee Moose, and that the costs of this action be taxed a8 * vy the Clerk. oe This o¢ . the plaintiff by the Clerk. th day of Aug. 195k. J. C. Rudisill his 9th day of August, 1954. _ Judge Presiding “” owe ee ee SO SO FF 1N THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM SECOND WEEK AUGUST TERM M. 195: 195), Monday, August 9th, 1954 7 Monday, August Sth, 195, ° 5 snt? ‘ wing of this Complaint: a aa Di J #1" pb Bs "Yes" e ivorce uryv ji eing dulv swo | Answer? : Zlgevia Lowman elled answers the issues submitted to it as Fe VS. . John H. Lowman ae : er “ ee IT IS, THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for the ‘ » * wil© 3TATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Minds of matrimony new and heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant eee [REDELL COUNTY M ve, and the same are, hereby dissolved, and that the plaintiff is hereby granted Sleevia Lowman M 2 absolute divorce from the defendant. Plaintiff iii ae Q STIRTHG ) Rk + } - ey fy = ‘ 7 IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the ;laintiff have the care, custody and con- VS. ISSUES trol of their minor child, Dannie Lowman, as alleged in the Complaint. , ae ; John H. Lowman Defendant IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plainti av t ae 2fendaant ’ nv. he costs of this action ne taxed by the Clerk. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in the complaint? Answers Yes. Have the olaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each two vears next preceding the bringing of this action, and the filing yliant: a bona fide resident sroni o +h hring or eceaing ne neine Marshall rsh ‘ olaintiff and defendant 9° arate and liv ; a awe fron d have they lived separate and a, ar 0 14 . a 2 oat 4 ® 4 . , , o hi } r Judge two vears cont inuously } ’ Ut institution Oo} heard, and heing heard before his "Honor, rs continuous] rio . ‘al vt erior VOUT» the August Term of Iredell County 2 : scat , + dq founc Has th ; ,fr n of the ota the following issues were subm tted to ane as the plaintiff been ; oO ‘ wm wT ? ) thi > ina for more than six months the commencemen® © alleged 3! Answers Yes. :ff and defendant married to each other, ™~ Foe Answer: "Yes". er from each ~ 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart f this action and a a A A IO fs other for two years next immediately preceding the bringing © the filings of this Complaint? Answer: "Yes". r rhe Strate of North and the 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident, of the ‘ ‘ , " ‘ ‘ : t 3 lina for six months immediately preceding the bringingof this action, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----~---- AUGUST TERM, 195) Monday, August 9th, 195,” “No. 5808 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 195), Colleen H. Marshall, Plaintiff vs. Eugene Marshall, Defendant This 7 h i 3 "his cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Suver- ior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor J. Ce. Rudisill, Judge Presiding,and a jury, andthe jury having answered the issnes Submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the records. is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Colleen H. Marshall, and nse the defendant, Eugene Marshall, be and the same are dissolved, and the I is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. ing duly sworn and empar- itted to it as follows: ar n 4 far a resident of the State of North Carolina 10! ing the institution of this action? defendant married as alleged in the complaint: Answer: 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separ ate and apart continuously for two years next ,receding the instituti action: Answers: Yes. IN THE S!PERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ~-- AUGUST TERM. 109 Monday, Angust Sth, “ ra Yo. 5614 ath CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR covet RaDBLL COUNTY ithur Edward Ingram e JUDGMENT ‘ice 0. Ingram This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable J. ¢. residing over the August Civil Term 1954 Iredell Suverior Cour: fore said Honorable J. C. Rudisi and a Jury, the following iss» “itted to the vt Has the plaintiff been six months next precedin Dlaintiff and plaintiff and inuously for twe . . - nero ‘ro ney © 9 + s~ ‘matrimony heretofore exist: ‘ver dissolved, and the olaint?! efendant , iMstin # 7 Alice O. Ingram, and slerk. of August IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 195, Monday, August, 1954 Leen No. 5533 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1951, thi, { Plaintiff, Roadway Express, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM QO Monday, Ausust Sth, 195! si “e, 5379 sgt CAROLINA M MUD arn ey c IN THE SUPERIOR COURT o At Tmo ” oath COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1951, srelyn Jane Beard, a Minor, j 4 : oe 2 { @ .; ner Next Friend, L. We Beard, VS. ISSUE 3 Plaintiff, { Aa Doris R. Pardue, Administratrix ' q VS. | JUDGMENT of the Estate of Frank Pardue, Defendants. ! Nanning Shows, A Corporation, | Defendants. what amount of damages is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the Defendant ii This cause coming on to be heard at the August Terr, 1954, of the Iredell as alleged in the ,leadings: : ‘unty Superior Court, before His Honor, J. ©. Rudisill, Judge Presiding, and bet: ANSWER: As requested $1183.89. ward by consent of the arties without a Jurvs that this cause was heard u,on i os satements of counsel for both :arties, and evidence submitted to the Court bv duly NCRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘sensed Physician, from which it aroears to the Court that the Minor, Lvelyn Jane IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1°54 ward, now sixteen (16) years of age, by her Next Friend, L. wW. Beard, her father, Roadway Express, Inc., ' Plaintiff, eetituted this action to recover damages which she sustained because of injuries 1S J DG EN seeived when she fell from one of the ridding devices of the Defendant on Frida Doris R. Pardue, Administratrix | ening, September 26, 1952, at the Iredell County Fair Grounds, located near th 5¢ +} . Ist ate of Frank Pardue, Defendants. wn of Troutman, North Carolinas and ‘t a aring to the Court that the ,arties ave agreed uyon a settlement of all matters and things growing out of the alleged his cause coming on to be heard before His sonor, Je Co disill, Judge ‘ ‘juries set forth in the Plaintiff's Complaint, dy tne terms of which the Veten- + o e oe : 1 Canunt siding, and a ry at the August, 1951 rm of the Su;erior Court of Iredell County, ie . a ant has agreed tovay the Plaint FF the sum of One nundared [wentv-Five Dollars lorth Carolina, and the ry having answered the issue submitted to them as 20. x . = “= ° 125 Nh) 4 o } nie + nf the Minor's alleged fmturtiasc toge?t t 125.00} in full and comclete settiemen oO né in S a i LU ’ lows: not 1 the cost of this action. that amount of aracves »} laintif? entitled to recever of the Vezen- —s, articular- And the Court having carefully examined the e' ence of th e, pa lant, as alleged in the pleadings: at nd "the eyi ne af +4 Phaetatan ler hoce care the inor as treé dy atiU syiden © ¢ he Phys an, nade? ios A ; . 90% oo AnOWale ag . . a wade ¢ : S A f oh att % zr ntir 7 it f Lee made to appear to the Court that the parents © } } Y nr + T mr ciae he laintif! tng 4 ui 4 49 Aw % va Ws Av Vu LD, and UL tis Vs 4 =r ; th a} : : ~ i. in 1¢ a4 r 1] n the settlement and that he. ds Ba folhroo} ‘ of avis C al, vta ’ ave and recover of the Defendant th m of One Thousand One Hundred #ighty- ee -nton that the Minor has mie excellent . 0 i VerOlina, who treated her, of the opinion tna pe L leva and RiehtyweNin Vat a .s 0) y the st this action ' ree Dollars and Eighty-Nine Cents (. 1,183.29), and the co: O is a Snare ‘ : turtes as the result of tne acc:~ . “oy and that there will ho no ermanen nu? 5 ic «CS he taxed by the Clerk . e +he llowing aec! > . ° nte ~ + Yarnyw? enters Ol1iLOwW A - ; that after full inquiry of the matter, the vou site ; his August “ 1¢ ° > Hundred and MIS AULZU 1 ° 1 - , ‘ sun ) Ons nat } , = nat the Plaintiff recover of the De fendan the sum © ' ¢C. Rudisili ..—<—""" ; the Office of tne — Je Ve BY; HOntwohs . 7 fo nt into the U ™ “Jr Tr Rudisill, Judge Presiding ‘Y-Five Dollars ($125.00), to be paid dy the Defendan Lark of tha o ; see North Carolina. Of the Superior Court of Iredell County, *OF’" carol , 5 ow te ae OK OH Beard, 2 That out the Clerk shall pay %° % °° out of the funds paid to him, ather ums 1.00) to reimburse 1) of the Minor, the sum of Fifty Dollars (: 0.00) iat! ae i a other exXx=- ment : : ‘tor serviceS, an¢ “ to the Davis Hospital for the hospital and doc are f° ie a $88 inc ; i Scott, Collier an incurred hy him: to the Minor's attorneys, oc , Nash, the sum she da ‘ s+h the reoresenta~ “Venty.Fs n : ‘ ection wit! "nty-Five Dollars (75.00) for services in conn , Vil ‘n this action. J. , ne taxed by the Clerk That t at of this action to De us ‘hat the Defendant pay the cos Sper 4 Lor Court eee ae a F “s Fe fore = I RR as EO a ee —_— Se a rT ar ~ a a. ~ x ne IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 195), Monday, August, 1954 ee “No. 5533 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 195), Roadway Express, Inc., Plaintiff, vs. ISSUE Doris R. Pardue, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank Pardue, Defendants. What amount of damages is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the Defendant It, as alleged in the ,leadings: ANSWER: As requested $1183.89. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOK IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM hoadway Express, cause comi f-, and a iury at Jorth Carolina, and the recover of lant, as all IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK ------.. AyGUST pape AE LLL , r . fh 1951, Monday, Aucust Sth, 195) =a ‘io, 5379 gat CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR coURT DELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1951, Saad) yelyn Jane Beard, a Minor, wy her Next Friend, L. W. Beard, Plaintiff, VS. oss Manning Shows, A Corporation, Defendants. i This cause coming on to be heard at tunty Surerior Court, before His Honor, J. nard by consent of the ;arties without a Jy statements of counsel for both :art? licensed Physician, from which it a ard, now sixteen (14) vears of are instituted this action recover ceived when she fell from one cf evening g, September 26, 1952, at the wn of Troutman, North Carolina; “ave agreed u,on a settlement e serned Q : ‘juries set forth in the “ant has agreed tocvay a0 Ann\ 125.00) in full and *r i the co 1e Defendant County, North Carolina. to him, the Clerk shall pay - 1 $50.00) to reimburse of the inor, the Dollars (350.00) ices, ‘ tor serv “O the Davis Hospital for the hospital and docto! Aatiia a : Q > vO lier an “Mcurred by him; to the Minor's attorneys, 9COb%, vee . ‘ f#h th Y-Five Dollars (75.00) for services " in this action. ss aw erk : $ to be taxed Dy the © 3+ That the Defendant pay the cost of this action to i ars rn ‘ior LOourt, Aw IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT SECOND WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 195, Monday, August 9th, 195 ; } oe 4. That the settlement between the parties, entered by consent, ana ’ - ’ aPoroved by the Court, is not unreasonable or unjust to the Minor Plaintiff but is ¢ h , © her best interest. j , in the Srreri XO rt of is Signed and entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County, Statesville, Nor Carolina on August 9, 195L. ee Rudisil] C. Rudisill, Judze Fresiqins ral L. W. Beard, Next Friend Scott, Collier & Nash By: Attorneys for Plaintiff ‘ t Adains, Dearman & Winberry By: C. H. Dearman Attornevs for Defendant T . T r . « We LOng and wW. L. Bonin, n / as . ; : /A "Bon x Long", Defendants , TF TOR . VUITI I YANKOLINA AOU ELL ul Nilliam L. Alltsor joing » rading and uSiness as "Statesville Manufacturing Com:any", FamLaciir VS. ong and W. L. Bonin, inder the firmr name of Lone", Defandants Je ve e heard and being heard before His Honor, bee ° es ee ae Court Rudisill, Judge and a jury at the August Term of the Superior ¥ to them as 7 of Iredell County jury having answered the issue submitted follows: ; $ : ‘of j hat sul: 1. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff, and, so, inW ANSWaRs nee ang” ($537.66): “ive Hundred Thirty-seven Dollars and Sixty-six Cents IN THE SUPERIOR COU SECOND WEEK ie wes 5) cori) Monday, Aueyst Sth, 1954, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintirr nd recover of the defendants the sum f YS yp Ww miu es nave @ of Five Hundred Thirty-seven Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($537.66) with interest thereon from the 3rd day of dori] : rae i I p ra , 1053, together with the costs of this ion to be taxed bv the Clerk This 10th day of August, 1954. J.C. Rudisill Judge Fresidine swe ok le x & f #563 vORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY iilliam L. Allison, T/A Statesville Manufacturing company, Plaintiff vs. *"vron Bradburn, Defendant l. Is the defendant ANSWER 3 52928 .16., H CAROLINA IREDELL COUNT’ 174 7 : $ } lilliam L. Al] son, trading and loing ousiness as "Stat esville anufactuiing Com; any," Plaintiff Defendant _ : } Fara HF coming on to he “d and being heard before 1s } T a + nT é at the August Term oO he Su rresidineg, and a we . tusw haetin nswered the V, and the fury having answer laint! nd. if so, in what defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and, 11 SO, in aoe m - . a. deca t ahs 4 rs and Sixteen Answer: Two Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-eight Dollars $2,928.14), : sno i FF have N . reed that the intl n “OW, therefore it is ordered, adjudaed, and decre t a , +yeeioht and p Thou Nine Hundred Iwenty-e1@ “Cover of the defendant the sum of Two Thousand ‘in vw - Jol) thereon from the lst dav o “ars and Sixteen Cents ($2,928.16), with interes i by the Clerk. action to be taxed by ay O59 : » 1953, together with the costs of this This 10th day of August, 195k. Je Ge Rudisill Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Mondav, August 9th, 195), if No. 5733 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR IREDELL COUNTY Re We Davis, Jr. and A. W. Sloop T/A Davis Supply Company VS. Cecil Waggoner and Layvon B. Waggoner 1. How much are the defendant endebted to the plaintiffs? Answer: 611.7( apm ‘Mee oiinwn eee NORTH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT August Term 1954 : Jr. and H. W. ‘ as ly Comvanv ce Ss Have, ve. 6 Sloop, T/A Davis Sur; Cecil Waggoner and Lavvon Vacgoner Cause coming on being heard hefore his Honor, ing found that the defendants tudisill and a jurvs wagzzoner and Lavyvon ®. Waegoner *2717 On : e : . . dite /Ve is urtner ordered the defendant endebted to the plaintiffs? IN THE SUPERIOR cot SECOND WEEK AUGUST cEne ea Mondav, August Sth, 195),” O51, ‘Yo. 5754 whi NA NY mye CPere yoaTH CAROLIN IN THE SUPERIOR couRT 1REDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 105, 9 ¥. Davis, Jr.- and H. W. he S : a ~~ Qn sloop, T/A Davis Supply Company VS. ‘ { This cause coming on to be heard and heine heard before his * fF, Little Honor, J.C. Rudisill and a jury; ry having found that the defendant ebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of 457,23. It is therefore ordered, adiudeed and a. little is indebted to the plaintiffs that the plaintiffs recover the sum of 457 the defendant, the costs of this action as shall h- Honorable Court 0*2n ‘ 7330 o'clock A. IN THE SUPERIOR couURT IN THE SUPERIOR ¢c gk N Way 'TTA° rom : T es vile ” OURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST Tanw, 195, SECOND WEEK AUGUST TERM, 105) Tuesday, August 10th, 195/ Tuesday, Aveust 10th io This Honorable convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning e apsolute divorce from the defendant by this Coy ’ ee . rt. under this judgment. ‘ August 10th, 1954, at 9:00 o'clock A. M. Done at Statesville, N. C., this the 10 day oe i ugust, A. D. 1951, “No. 5820 4 fadee Pee e+ Rudisill ys PUR anppers vudge rresent and Presid: IN THE SUPERIOR cou; a é Siding RT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST NORTH CAROLINA MOoOnprs a TERM, 1654 ‘Yo, 5621 vORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY wancy Dellinger Howard, plaintiff i | ISSUES J. Houston Howard, defendant | ztty Jean Nantz Caudill, 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant intermarried VS. Complaint? iverett Cyril Caudill. Answer: Yes. It appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that at 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and avart february Term, 1954, in the action of Betty Jean Nantz Caudill vs wow . aa V other for two vears next preceding the institution of audill a divorce decree was zrantec and in said divorce decree divorce, as alleged in the Complaint? given the custody of the child horn Answer: Yes. one-half years of age, and the id de roviding that the defendant Has the ainti heen ‘resident of the State of North Carolin iff the sum of 3 O( er month for e maintenance itution of this action for ahsolute div child, the Court " : a that the defer 1 0543 the Court he has only the defendant tee being iss ied defendant ana the Reeular August judgement T t hefore his Honor defendant intermarred as : ged in the 0 ‘he defendant has fully complied with the orde is case continued under former order. . Af t v intiff and the defendant lived separate and apart :ron Rinus te . 7 F " , . : for absolute LOY wO next orecedinge the institution of this action [for ao livorce, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. i 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Cardina ‘ ¢ monshs next preceding the institution of this action for absolute divorce, 4 alleged in the complaint? Answers: Yes bonds 7 ‘ce + s j : e it is, therefore, considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that th he de- of matrimony existing between the vlaintiff Nancy Dellinger Howard and t : is ; ted an fendant J. Houston Howard he farawar Aterclved, and the plaintiff 1s gran IN THE SUPERIOR COURT UGUST TERM, 1954 August 10th, 1954 SECOND WEEK ------- A No. 5789 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY RAYMOND RALPH FOX IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR coy SECOND WEEK ----.-- AUGUST TERM ‘Yo, 5263 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 195, ys. Clyde D. Jenkins and ‘yin States Insurance Company, Plaintiffs, ! VS. ’ ! EDWARD SCHEIDT, COMMISSIONER vs OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF NORTH : : Of NA as : seen @ ochrles W. Lewis and Morrison @ wrniture & Fixtures Company, This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Incorporated 7 mm incor} , . Defedants. Judge Presiding at the August Term, 1954, Iredell County Superior Court, on an q \ > agreed statement of facts; and the Court, after giving full consideration to ; 1. Was the automobile of the Flaintiff, Mrs. Clvde D. Jenkins, damaged the pleadings, the agreed statement of facts, and the arguments, heitng of the ™ ty the negligence ofthe Defendants as allesed in the Complaint? Opinion that as a matter of law the petitioner is entitled to have his driver's 1 ANSWER: Yes. icense reissued, and that the action of respondent in reveking cetit} 2. Did the Plaintiff's son, icense was erroneous? tribute to the damages to the ! lai NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERE ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the vetitione ANSWER: No. is entitled to the return of hi iver license, and the spondent is di Nhat damages, if anv, are laintiffs titled to recover? ed to return the same. And t respondent is taxed with the costs. This 10th dav of August, nd Fixtures bi] as allered oile damaged by the neglicence c ANSWER: No. >. What damages, if any NORTH CAROLINA company entitled to recover? IREDELL COUNTY ANSWER ¢ Raymond Raljh Fox 8. 2130 ard 2131 NORTH CAROLINA Commissioner of Motor Vehicles 'o the judgment in the record and the signing and entering thereof the IREDELL COUNTY PXCe LHS d gives notice of ay,;eal in open court to the Su;reme 2 v3 far To ° + : : ; 1 hotw ) e LV. i waived. It is sticulated and agreed hetween counsel fo { a a . eal unsel forthe res,ondent that the record and casé on 4 MOORE { ° r f breaking and enterins tion, the answer, the agreed statement of facts, th AS, the defendant was arraigned on the charge of brea of euiltv of forcible trespass, which pieaswas — ee eee aes — . t ‘ ‘ ° A } 4 + U t O21 and . : and the a,,eal entries in the recore Appeal bond in the amoun *Senv, and tendered a plea judgement me ’ the defend- fore ordered and adjudged that $100.00 adjudged sufficient. pted by the Solicitor, it is there term of 18 months, to oes , i‘ ant | . ; a + County for a his the 10th day of August, de confined in the common jail of Iredell Coun i id term. mmission to serve said cited i ae al Ee SS Soe se Se nd de : : 7 (° 88Signed to the State Highway and Public Works Co the defendant J. C. Budisilh i t Judge Presiding “Plas and commitment to the foregoing sentence shall not ‘ t ool and shall there remain 0! issue if a spine abo 18 : . nat nd i Committed to the Eastern Carolina Training Sch al Y ho anv b obedient to the " — rs it ut attempt to escape therefrom, and be | | rb ioe il such time as he shall e dis = tte rul i ‘ °S and regulations of said institution, unt = Cha “Feed according to law. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 195) Tuesday, August 10th, 1954 Upon the violation of the rules and regulations of the institution or up Don the escape from said institution, capias to issue immediately for the Said de fendant and the above sentence to go into effect. This the 3rd day of August, 1954. dette Rudisill Judge Presiding ~ No. 5561 ~~ —_— and empanelled as follows: W. H. Jennings S. B. White x Charles Mack, Phillip Mack Wayne W. Miller Floyd — Mone? Overeash & George Mack T/A Charles G. E. Keiger J. B. White R P.M Danie} Mack & Sons H. H. Evans U.N. Morgan 4H. EB. Mitehos wn. > ‘ se se MIULChOn Robert C. Knox NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Yor c NO 1859 JUDGMENT AND ORDER coming on to he heard and being heard before His Honor J. C. Rudisill, Judge Presiding at the August T rm, 1954, Superior Court for Iredell County, and it ap;earing the Court that Judgment was entered in the above en- lav Term, 1954, titled cause defendant he imprisoned in the common work on the su.ervision of the State Highway and Public works +he Commission. This prison sentence is suspended for a period of five years on following ex,;ressed conditions: on . . \ j n y 1. That the defendant be and remain of good behavior and not vansene © of 1 ne criminal laws of N. C. or the J. S. A. 50.00 and the cost of this action. hat he not o,erate a motor vehicle in the State of N. C. eriod of three (3) vears from the rising of this court. mn srector ‘hat he surrender his drivhe license to be transmitted to Oe a of public saftey, at Raleigh, together with a copy of this J¥ Pern} 24 : : ‘ . : : ar rermittsion is given at anv subsequent term within said five (5) ye , has veriod to ; lace this sentence into effect if it appears that the defendant violated any of the conditions of this judgement." IN THE SUPERIOR COURT GR0ONS WERK ..-nc0- diate: oe ~ueSday, august 10th, 19 RM, 195) 54 That a motion having been made by the defendant through his c 1 ' S Counsel, and Battley, that condition numb sa yelaughlin ’ n number three of said judgment be stricken ified, and the court in its di ‘ tee cut and mod , 'S discretion finding as a fact that said tion is not unreasonable. It is, therefore, ordered, adtudzed and decreed: That Condition Number Three o° said Judgement be stricken out and another section Number Three be inserted in lieu thereof to read as follows: "That he not operate a motor vehicle in the State of North Carolina on or sefore the tenth day of Aueust, 1951". Except as herein modified, the remaining crovisions upon which the sefence was suspended are to remain in full force and effect. This 10th day of August, 1951. / Sp #3485 ORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY sobert Hunter Moorefield vs. *» B, (Dick) Albea and wife florence Alhea coming on tc heing heard, ar Sy lesa } : involves a houndaryv lin ‘me defendants, and that certain heen made and that ‘onSiderable time +o undertake ama,; ana tne cou that should he referred; ther of the orinion th his is case referer motion orders a " ™ Fore, Esquire, of Mooresville, North Carolina, © gh nd + testimony and siall hear this matter and shall examine all records and take 5 ; : 7 lew + ™ P ¢ deen ecessarv$ shall -he emises and make such surveys as he ma jeem nec "act ‘ . . a fear * witnesses a ‘S that he may deem necessary from witnesses, atte! he ; hir and «} . 5 a witnesses efore Nu! “ Shall have + he power and authority to suopoena * ness ar heard the facts, and p) re i peace where the matter shall be heard and when he ha | facts and his ey ! finding of the facts ane ll render his report as such referee of the finding 0 hall be filed in that that this report shals oe l “"0n of the law concerning this case y ten days before the r 0 } t n offic n ' tines Cina el] Count ‘ice of the Clerk of Sucerior Court of Ired , — N 7 urte 1§ Of the November Term of Iredell County 0 for further orders. ‘nd this case is retained on the docket oe Sena. A) de oa a eat ne eanr ne ne pe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---------- AUGUST TERM Tuesdav, August 10th, 1954 : To the foregoi object and except and a request for a trial by jury is made and lowing ssue to be determined by said jurv: Issue: defendant? Where is the true dividing line between the plainti 1951, ng complusory reference, both the plaintiff and the defendant he aerendants : Submit the fel. ff and the J.C. Rudisill JUDGE PRESIDING J Sp 3589 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM + 4a “ir 1 L. 0. ; Williams and de L. Williams c ~ Vv . N TUR enor: ee niee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1954 ita ORDER OF REFERENC Villiams and husband, ivrtle } Williams QD 4 M ie s a4 coming on to be heard before the undersiened being heard, and the Court heing o a boundarv line or which is disputed defendants; and that certain su have heen made and that considerable time to undertake ry the case on a maps and the ion ; eis S a case thi: should ion orders North Carolina, ma tte examine all records and ang maxe such survevs as he may deem necessarv . foeaomn : rad : \ ‘ ere . > > 7 a »+ + m nec rom witnesses Iter tne witne haf authority tc oena witnesses he heard and when he has heard report as referee of the finding of the fa be i ee : 1s , 2 Oi he law concerning this case and this report - } Clorl year ‘ fy v } or tne Ulerk of Sucerior Court of Iredell County ten davs before the November iredell County Court . And thi is retained on the docket for further shall be filed is cause and inted referee. ; shall hear als sses are sworn 0 ro 1 hoa cts an in the office . the opening 0 faroane ty ,le ar ? j j creso:ng com:ulsory reference, both the plaintiffs hoi ¢ and exce .t and enter 2g req iest for a trial DV jurv and suomi vv Said jury: ty . wnere ‘ fendant.? J. C. JJDGE ‘gs the true dividine line between the plaintiff and the de- Rudisiteg—— PREOL Il sderable time to undertake to trv the IN THE SYPERIOR coyrr SECOND WEEK - sekass Tee SECOND WEEK ----.-.. 2 AUGUST TERM, Tuesdav, Aneust 10th 195) 195), 3590 yr CAROLINA peDBLL COUNTY ins, Le O. Williams vs. wrtle Williams and wspand, B. F. Williams This cause coming on to he heard hefore “the Court and being heard, and the Court xtion involves a boundarv line or the defendant; and that certain surveys have } : © and that it case and the court the opinion that this is a case that shon erred: unr WiStOSUS G, the court of referpo uire, of Mopresville, Nor C a, is here sh ld, is matter and shall exar ecords and and make such s deem necessarv the power andanuthor: the matter shall such refere is case and of Iredell Peewee. a endar would ta} ne ing Furth IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---..... AUGUST TERM, 105) Tuesdav, August 10th, 195), , IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK -----W__ er ties “a VOL TERN 051 Wednesday, August llth, 195, Sp 372k a '69 N06 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR coypr “@ oth CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cover EDE UNTY HAtrom mr 4 ” whLOR COURT sas | B27 0, seokins a . rE, vettie mitcne 7H win States Insurance Company ss 4 Plaintiffs : 7 ORDER OF REFERENCE 4 John McDaniel and wife, e etasisl aaa ol Talmage @ xwarles W. Lewis and Morrison } IV nie 1z@, Lona me ohrni & Fi Co I . , “nr x e m i aeee tas 7urniture ixtures Company, Inc, This cause comings on to te heard nd he} Th 4 . : ‘ » 3 : sone oe , neard, and heine heard + sae ie This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge at this tern es mene nears before His nonor, vd. C, ; a i - aT iudisill, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the Ano m of the Court andbeing heard, and the Court being of the orfinion that since this : Jury at the August 1954 Term of the Superior i curt of Iredell County, North Carolin le +4 ‘ h r ; ” sno 5 $ : : > Cn Uy ) na and the tury havine Peete aa sake te action involves a boundary line or lines, which is disputed by the plaintiffs . jury having answered the issues submitted to therm as follows: and the defendants, and that certain survevs have been made and that it would 1, Was the automobile of the Plaintiff : : Was af 4 J un 4ainti r ‘led } ] i take considerable time to undertake to trv the case on a } ; ; : ntiff, Mrs. Clyde D,. Jenkins. damac. aer ] C U n i maps ad the haing oy ¢ or] © f Def 13 } 4 is ao aps; and the court hej: the neglizence of the Defendants as allesad in the C rplaint? ra) rn $ ; $ > urther of the opinion that this is a case that should be referred: Answer: Yes WHEREFORE, the court of its own motion orders a referee in this cause and 2. Did the Plaintiff's son, David Lee woote hi ] na =e LTiUd m, va 1 LAS wooten 1S Own neclirence con- a. : tribute to the damares to +h- Dia rs ones . 9 ee . > Pp - Renan re - a nT . ‘ ; ; : ae 9 BGHGEoS U n 1ain I S autoro! S TA n We te rope, Esquire, of sooresville, North Carolina, is hereh: appointed referee, the Answer? oe Shall hear this matter and shall exarine all records and take testimony and Answer: No. wtaer he ram 4 5 an maba a } 1a } 1) Lew the premises and make such surveys as he ~av deem necessarv: shall hear all 3. What damages, if any, are the Plaintiffs entitled t or es, ny, a the Plair s entitled to recover? acts that he may deer necessary from witnesses, afterthe witn>sses are sworn and Answer: $300.00, a+ c +3mn ann nl Da whore a w + ” 1 } ; Uhe } ; ts \ : at a ti anc place where th atter shall be heard. when he has heard the facts, 4e Was the Defendants ‘orrisor Furniture and Fixtures Co par autorohile h nat 9 ., la darared bv the neelisence of David Lee Wooten as alleged in the e snaii render nis report as such referee of the finding of the facts and his Answer? Opinion of the law concernins this case and this report shall be filed in the Answer: No. ' affine af tha Ciadk of Siteewtae Gan © tended? 6 > ten davs hefor ) ; ; lerk o Sur 0} Jourt o lred 1] County ten das efore the de mat darazes, :f anv, s the D fendant, orrison frurnitur anc 1x- | tures so" pany anette laar to reco roy? tel Op nine of the “attra, ” ery " TwaAael . . iets < ; = a f spel t J i Ove I 0] rec hah sounty ,OUTT e 4 ote Answer: a anc tnis case is retained on the docket for further orders. i mee ‘a i ‘OW, therefore, it is ordered, adfudzed and creed that th plaintiffs J, C,. Rudisill i ‘ve and recover of the defendants the sur of Three Hundred and 00/2 (3300.00 JUDGE PRESIDING y D0)) J : : ; _ La ‘ : : “ars with interest thereon from the date of this juderent, tozether with the ce. Oo th Crecoing compisoryv reference oth the plaintiffs and the defendants 0° » ” °0Sts of hh? o . . : . } ha ae ; 644 etn ~ “M1iS action to he taxed hv the Clerk. i ect and except arn nter a request for a trial hy jury and submit the followin a Th th : ita a - nis ]} dav of August, 195 i ; 4 su C y nea 33 _ jurvs a! ‘ a i Cn RII ccinicnsinieniiie By sSSsues vhere Ss the true a line ] ne hetween the plaint iff and the F aoe JIDGE PRSolDI 1 encant? ‘ , ‘Pon the coring in of the verdict the defendant moves to set the same ' Je Ce Rudisill __-- oo ———— Tite PRESIDING Side, Noes a ; ° e ial “or errors JUDGE PRasIDINs * “Otion denied. Exception. Defendant moves for a new tri 48s Judement signed as lt 2 Acne eaten ee ace ad imed - : ‘ = 4 fd and to he assiened. Motion denied. Exception. * the judgement the defendant excepts - a tw pen. 4. 4 M. . < “. ‘ a ra 2DDear ’ Sin the record. To the signing o and Further notice a , , 1th This Honorable court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, August 1th a a. ‘ S1ves notice of appeal to the Supreme Court in open Court. Q G+ ? ‘ r 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. I. Yaived, en Appeal Bond in the sum of $200.00 adjudged sufficient. ™ aterent The defendant is allowed 30 days in which tomake up and serve st ter- fter to serve coun “a8e on appeal and the plaintiff allowed 30 days therea "8Se | 4 . JUDGE PRESIDING , Or +3 lle exceptions. orang: cenaeaeee ee et & er ee mee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | IN THE SUPERI SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM, 195; SECOND WEEK eee TERM dednesday, August llth, 195, Wednesday, Ausust llth. ion’ 1954 “No. 5561 Oe, 5634 Charles Mack, Phillip Mack oe NA — and George Mack, tractus as fae at CAROLS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Charles Mack & Sons, Mm 2eLL COUNTY Plaintiffs, _ @ ‘av Harris, VS. e —_ Plaintiff Robert C. Knox, } 7 VS. Defendant. q ) @ j,i. Steelman, 7 Defendant 1. Was the automobile of the plaintiffs damazed hy the netlizence of th letlizence . efe 1 ‘ r j ~ ; 2 4 Thi mi to | rd and : ; defendants as alleged in the complaint? ; This cause coming on to he heard and eine heard at the Aueust. 1953 =) Answer: Ye | the Superior Court of 60622 Chenhs.. Kates Sta c ; swer es. m © the ouper:o ourt of Iredell Count erore His Honor J. C. Rudisill. Judce ill, Jud 2. Did the plaintiff, by his own neglicence, contribute to t residing, upon an appeal from the order of the Slex the damages to vlerk of the Superior Court denv the plaintiffs" automobile as alleced in the answer? ig the motion of Motors Insurance Corporation to set aside a previous ord of ba t \ . \ ¢ : pre us rder said Answer: No. Jerk, makine said Corporation a party-defendant in the ahove entitled acti 3. What damages, if any, are the plaintiffs entitled to recover? we grounds that said Clerk did not have the discretionary power or furisdiction Answer? 3.50.00 ‘0omake said Corporation a partv-d fant in said action: ot Was the defendant's And it appearing to the ; 1) Prar he [es lines ana arvrurent of couns » Robert C. Knox", automobile damazed hy the : : : a a : that iA Taw iueee eee ee 1 , : se gence of the plaintiffs, as allezed in the answer? “at the said Clerk had no jurisd Or authority to make said Corporation hates ; ; : is Answer3 “ditional partv-defendant in this caus ' hat such authority , . 3 . “ pe ‘ : in + Ai ratinn ° he fal - wll ee What ny, is the defendant, Robert C. Knox, entitled n the discretion c or trial judces: cover said autorohile? pearing that the said Corporation's appeal sh d > allowed and that . loryt lh an oy : ° 3 . . ° Answer: ustk’s order overrulins said Corporation's motion to vacate /e@ 6 lama : : i ce ” "aking j an addir? we Ada Sandan a naka tne 6. what darace, if any, is the defendant, Robert C. Knox, | additional partv-defendant and the said Clerk's wr Aat 4 e lad i- for personal injuries? endant in this action should he reversed > Answer: ion -1efmndant ordered that an additi was _ dav of Aueust, 105) ee Sanat ne ed i Se aa —— os — a on Ta iain AS a at ci il i a eae ee an iN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR coyrRr SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 105), SECOND WEEK ------- august qapy Wednesday, August llth, 195, Thursday, August 12th, 1952 1954 4 #5767 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT : 4 Cc ; This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment Thursday iis ores y, Augus l2th, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, IREDELL COUNTY Do BREA No, 2136 State EN efendant enters &@ plea of Guilty ss than 3100.00. - Judgement of the Court is that t s t i he Defendant be con ah: to the Common Jail of Iredell County for. eee > os mame: = eC . VUU vv 4 i a oa 2 “1GHTEEN (18) MONTHS, to be assipned to * WO on the roads under the Supervision of the vtate Highway and Public Works Commission. Thi eantoa 2 i = osha yo uvence 18 sus;ended for a period of Three (3) ING, ENTERING AND taerey Robert C. Black, Individually, and ) aac TERING AND LARCENY ‘ as a stockholder, on tehalf of hir- a self and anv other stockholders or ) uddy Millard Murdock creditors who mav come in and join K “EMe16 him in this proceeding, " ORDER -_ to Larceny K D of le : VS. : Ss SL ee ee ee ee s Black and Tavlor Motors, Inc. ) ’ Years and the defendant 4 3 : ue oerendant is hereby placed on cro- # r tion . a & ns ok : ; =e es : 7 Pe son unde he supervision of the North Carolina iis aii a or — ; - ation Commission and its Officers, subfect to iInloO VLAUOL coming on » he hear e re is H ~ 7. £ Rudies . the rovie 2 af +} al Le , : ee 9 LAYOS, CO Cc a © onor « - Mudisill, Judge wis eS the laws of this State and the 7 as ve ” ao s Qn . ° . si oar e : . . rules and orders of said vommission, and its office: Pr idi the ist Ter the u: eri { t. Co 1 ioe ith Cc > that +] + 3 : eee aoe eee , rresiding at the August Term o he Su; erior Court of Iredell vounty, and beine with ] ave that the execution might be vraved at an\ time an rine the oeriod of robation Ts. cia gui : ’ mY : : 3 : oe , ’ . és : ° eli - = we heard upon the petition of the Receiver heretofore appointed hy the Court in thie gered by the Court that the Defendant vay the cost of this action bv the November Term of this Court cause: and it appearing to the Court that said Receiver has made nurerous efforts \ : 4 3 ° : . sii + to collect the accounts receivable and outstanding Owing hy the dehtors of the ‘ : No. 5561 defendant company to it and that a total of $297.27 has meen collected hv the Re- jorth Carolina In the Superior Court j ceiver from the accounts receivable as turned over to him at the time of his lis Iredell County August Term, 1951 appointment: that the remainder of said accounts receivahe are such that it would i P| ff charles Mack, Yhilli. Mack & ( 1 * ° + ae ° + . . : * a on / . . . i oe imoractical tofile snit to collect same in that it would cos: rore, bv wav of eorge Mack T/A Charles Mack & Gan Sane @ ‘ ’ toons, plaintiff q -Ourt costs, than could he anticipated to he received from such suits: and that 3 JUDGMEN o j ‘ : . Y would be advantazeous to the defendant, and the creditors of the defendant, for the sobert C. Knox, Defendant ( iteceiver to sell the outstanding accounts receivahle at oublic sale: oe ’ f It is now ordered that the Heceiver he and he is herehv authorized, impowered, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. C. and directed to sell all accounts receivable now outstandine to the defendant here- mdisill, Judce rresiding, and a Jurv at the August Term of the Superior Court ~™ - >, ‘ s 4 * * ° ae : . 7: pa fe an af T . ‘ e ° . 3 + seen - « mitten ¢ e nN at l > sale at +h oO rthouse door ¥ Statesv le, Jorth Carolina, a e ’ iredel] s0unty, and the Jury HKavine answered he issues C . : . 2 ; oe 5 with a general circulation in 4S follows: in for four successive weeks and 5v ,ourthouse door in St: sville, North Caroi?na, ior to the sale #} he plaintiff, negligence contri: ° . - Anewor’ iff's automobile as alleged in the Answer: "No", ve + recover: fs entitled to recov ° £ t damages, if any, are the plainti! 5450.00. “ int ji ffs N , idee screed that the plaintif! “Ow, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and dec : “ave ) ¢ Four Hundred and Fifty Dollars, to- "8nd recover of the defendant the sum of Four Hun ether with he taxed by the Clerk. the costs of this action to ‘his 12th dav of August, 1954. J. C. Rudisill Juage Presiding a a a a a a a a ed - i 5 an aed = ee — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TERM Thursdav, August l2th, 195/, Coe. 5811 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cour IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 1954 Priscilla B. Smith VS. JUDGMENT vi G. J. Smith This cause coming on to be heard hefore his Honor, J. C. Rudisill Presig: oe & SS » *re lading T + m Oc Jud re at sh Au us I 1 , DL I d at Sup j i e r : v e \ £ S 4 er m 7 4 icc € ‘ eY 10Y C I u Y 1 ; ’ ’ ‘ t ou , and it a bea ing to the Court that Frank M. Armstrong has heretofore made a temvora rv allowance in this cause, and the action cannot he tried at this term of Court. 7 70 TuRDeerne ss . IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the allowance for the na han 2 + ; ; and benefit of the wife and child he, and the same is hereby continued to November Term, Iredell Superior Court, or until such time as the case be tried and dis: od of. h 3 r ft re tc YT neard before his H,nor, q : 7 Iredell Superior Court, upon a;.eal by the de- laintiff before the Clerk of t granted the to the Court that the laintiff was representec and the defendant was reoresented by “0M 3. Havmer, her apovcears to the Court that the cause of action we filed, and that the plaint? nat no counterclaim was the Clerk of Superior Court, which he had 4 f +#heo ordered, considered and adjudged that the judgment of vl * ‘ : : cts oF action be, and the same is hereby, confirmed and the 4 i. Rudisill JUDGE PRESIDING wk we ee ok the deductible caluse of the ‘endant on the rround that sation wagon Yore IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK ‘en phe ok Thursday, Avevst 12th. 05), ° 1954 ‘vo, 5437 ai NA a yoaTH CAROLI IN THE SUPERIOR couRT RBDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 165) J, ¥ Moore, 3 Plaintiff, VS. coward Deal, Defendant. This cause coming on to be he ea; neard | Wee Y 1 3 ins heard hefore 1S Honor J. & 0 shad . P ; } + + > Pn EC 7 5 ndisill, Judge Presiding at the rm, 1954, Iredell County sucerior Court r vourt, fram C64 a8 hx - : rom the ret ly I 7G y he laintiff LO the defendant's amended “a c +4 . fw Sn 3 4 2 answer and cross action, id fror ntiff's motion, that the defendant arried a collision insurance policy on his Jeeo station wagon with the Calvert ‘ire Imsurance Company, Baltimore, of the collision , the insurance company has paid *o1 } SS and sy ined hr 1e defendantts ‘ep Station wagon, with the exce i insurance further appea ourt that the ,laintiff has moved to make insurance company a yarty insofar as the alleged damage to the defendant's Jee is concerned, that theinsurance company is the real party at Court, being of the opinion that the Calvert Fire Insurance Maryland, defendant AND DECREED that arty defendant in “umons, torether with a coov of this order, a copy of the Arn mplaint, and a copy 6f the defendant's amended answer, and a laintiffte y» ; : 3 ee (Con aantiif's reoly, be served on the Calvert Fire Insurance Com,an 't Fire In to adc the amends Ansurance Company if it so desires, ormitted i] pO, . s : . : ~ j its own fore filed by the Defendant, or file such »leadings on on i+ » #0 May be advised, fi ; ; ‘ Yountv. North Carolina Entered and signed in the Sucerior Court of Iredell County, ‘orth va ' a St tesyi O+ atesy lle, on the 12th dav of August, 195! . ., Rudisill ve Ve E Rudisill, Judge IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- AUGUST TERM, 195), Thursday, August 12th, 195) a 5817 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1954 Shirley Louise Coone, Infant, by ana through her next friend, Mrs. J. C. Freeze, Plaintiff, Vv s . MY’rrison and Lucille Morrison, Defendants. Henry This cause coming on to be heard at the August Term, 1954, of the Iredell County Superior Court, before His H,nor, Jd. C. Rudisill, Judge residing, and "29 being heard by consent ofthe carties without a Jury; that this cause was heard of counsel for both parties, and evidence submitted to the Court A. “9 ppears to the Court that the infant, Shirley Louise Coone, now 4 . ay lil a4 oe. a ny , : , . by her Next friend, rs C. Freeze, ner mother, in- damages which she sustained when she @s attacked March, 1954, by a dog allegedly owned and maintain- in Iredell County, North Carclina, as is set appearing to the Court that the and things growing out of the 7 3 fw daamee llezed injuries ff's Complaint, by the terms of which the Defendant, Henry ison, has agreed to pay the Baintiff the sum of One Thousane and comslete settlement of the infant's alleged in- action earing to the Cou ermanert in nature, are not : ' ‘ ' , . red follow- ing, and that after a full inquiry into the matter, the Court entered the foll ; , . ry . ing decree: ; es ' : um 01 ver of the Defendant, Henry Morrison, the suf Morrison, Dollars | ), to} aid »y the Defandant, Henry ; , " ium % Carolina. ce of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North va the infant's out of the funds vaid tohim, the Clerk shall pay t° attorney, R. A. Hedrick 1e sum of Three Hundred Dollars, , ‘n connection with the representation in this action. 3. That the Defendant pay the cost of this action to be taxed b of Superior Court. " y- m . d appro 4. That the settlement between the parties, entered by consent, 4” ‘ t 0 A . a: ie put 35 ed by the Court, is not unreasonable or unjust to the infant plaintiff, her best interest. ue a i ’ Amns gratesy Signed and entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County,» IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND Wak -------— AUGUST Tend, 1554 Thursday, August l2th, 1954 rth Carolina, on August llth, 195k. T no Us yonpening le the Budind i) Je ©. Rudisill, Judge Presiding sy CONSENT : Mrs. J.-C. Freeze fs. J. Ce. Freeze, Next Friend Rk. A. Hedrick T. fedrick, Attorney for Plaintiff veDougle, Srvin, Horack & Snep,o, x Paul R. Ervin tau) Re Brvin, Attornevs for Defendants ‘p 5009 “ORTH CAROLINA HE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY 4, 2, Steadman, et al vs. ). & Scott, et Jourt to which amendment in paragra “a+ aterial matter. neted s entitled to arend their answer sO as erstand the truth to be, on, in order to be fai i and order . ‘ i next term of the t orders a mistrial and sa. -er +o have 30 days there- o4 d amendment to he filed wi i f to na , a replv. : : ’ ; ec 4 + ho cermitting of the defencant i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 1°51, pe aaa Thursdav, August 12th, 1954 " Ce elas, insu ee 195k" 195) “Yo. 5669 [Thelma Ostwalt, { ’ ft CAROLINA, In the Sy | . a will COUNTY. perior Court — ee | By, laure T, Harris, Plaintiff 4 The C d f h 1 é salad 4 fhe Court in its discretion, after the selection of the jury and finding 4 . id a that there are subpoenas issued for a total of 56 witnesses for the ial 4 x ee before a Honor, J. C Y q the defendant in the hearing of this cause, and that there are only some nine ’ ” Ce eee ee eee F ne nin Ay the Iredell County Superior Court, August Term, 195) in Statesville, North hours left of court time in which to try the case, the Court is of the opinion i roline on an application for an order for alimony pendente lite; that it that said case is of such magnitude and importance that it cannot be tried with- F pear ing to the Court that the plaintiff instituted an action in the Superior in that length of time, including the argument of counsel and the charge of the 4 T cot of Iredell County against the defendant for alimony without divorce on July Sourt, and for that reason the Court of its own motion withdraws a juror and 13, 1954, and that @ copy of the Complaint and Summons were served on the defendant jeclares a mistrial and orders the case set pre-emptorily for the first trial the same day; that the Complaint alleges that the plaintiff and defendant were i at the Civil Term of this Court beginning November 15, 1954. | wried in 1903 and lived together as husdand and wife until July 1952, when the The defendants in oren court moved the Court that they be permitted to Jixndent abandoned the plaintiff and nas since lived separate and apart from her; nake all the heirs of Mrs. T. A. Ostwalt oarties defendant to this action. wi it further appearing to the Court, the defendant has had five (5) days notice wrequired by law, And it further appearing to the Court that this matter was heard upon ludings of the parties, several affidavits, statements and argument of counsel; 6x $320 John Henry Jones ve. Mavel Jones <9<<<-3== eee" Continued cma ab sd ; : : : : iter hearing all the evidence and argument of counsel, the Court finds the following lo. 5513 Dorothy Moore Leonard vs. John Leonard <----9rerrererrrrrrer™ ontinued ee aw het: “a 'o. 5740 Dolleither Smyre Scott vs. Wade Franklin Scott -<-«<°c%***-**"* vontinued. x : 20) senna That the Complaint of the plaintiff states a cause of action against the C 58 Fred oods elen D COdUS <<nce cence ee esse errr rnenn ont inue . Se a ee ee : ee eee gatas and that the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary allowance and counsel f ‘Yo. 5326 Thomas H White vs. Herbert D. Wooten & Joyce Wooten ww=rrnr™ Continued ; ss - ‘ts pending the prosecution of this action; that the plaintiff has not sufficient a 5603 Vance hag Ss 3 fller & wife --------- Continued for Defendan if , ae oe - wins whereof to subsist during the prosecution of this action, to defray the proper . YNo. 5€48 Bennie Ray Freeze vs. Walter E£1i Sherrtil. dig OF Bb S08" co, 7 Continued by vourt. td necessary expenses thereof; and that the defendant has sufficient means from si o. 5657 George orean vs. Roy Fleet Peacock ---------ereerrrrn mn" Continued. ba to provide for temporary support and maintenance of his wife, the plaintiff; i C 56€ helma Ostwal iS Sar Ostwalt q<<---2 nen eee rrr een eenn™ Continued. ‘hat her only income amounts to Twelve Dollars and Fifty Cents ($12.50) per month : 5653 wv vrc h ’ r VS Iredell Farm Certer 146, seeaceeeereree™ Continued. "ich she receives from Social Security; that upon the foregoing facts, found by ‘ 870 ie Lynn ect e neent Nunev --««<<<cneneenerrrrn= Cont snued by Court ne Court, 6736 Millers Mutual Ins. Assoc. of Illineis vs. Glenn Johnson --°°""" Continued. IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED? i} ‘ sii ie tua ie ase ent Bui, | ‘io. 5023 Bllis 7. Bailey T/A The Hudson Bailey Faint Co. vs: continued: 1. That the defendant pay to theplaintiff for her rane eee ne wm. De Fox T/A The Mack Fox Paint Co. ----cereeenernrnnnnn e before August 20, iH! | j'* ($20.00) per month, the first payment to be made on or next term of Superior l hy and & like amount each month up to and including the 0 tof Iredell County, which begins on Novemoer 8, 1954. H. Dearman, Attorney for the plaintiff, @ That the defendant shall pay to % h * sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) to be credited on counsel fees. d+ This cause is retained for further orders. tesville Signed and entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County, State ’ hp th Caroline on August 11, 195). Ss Ba yting Op if = anita Tyage Hei° rete sa saaeaaee ae? IN THE SUPERIO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK AUGUST TR SECOND WEEK -------~- AUGUST TERM, 195), Thursdav, August 12th. Thursday, August 12th, 195. ' To the signing of the foregoing findings of fact and order, the Defendant Re ‘x5, 5609 Harvey Harris excepted. Py _p. Steadman, et a) me.” Thereupon the Defendant in open Court gave notice of appeal to the Suprene | VS. Court of North Carolina and the appeal bond is fixed at One Hundred Dollars ), W Scott, e& al ($100.00). The Defendant was, by consent and order of Court, allowed thirty the plaintiff, through his atto - ; e f saver ey ™ n ideas Lorney, Urant Bolmer ESaq., moves the Court days in which to prepare and serve case on appeal and the Plainti ; S the Court : : oe See ips tor judgment upon the pleadings, the Court advising said attorney that on ves- thereafter in which to serve countercaseé or exceptions. der was mad rmitting the def at on ye rerday an order was * PY ing the defendants to amend their oleadings as Entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County at Statesville, North oe so paragraph 5, and for that reason the Court overrnules the motion Carolina on August 12, 195}. eo said ruling the plaintiff excepts 2. 2. Rudisill ghis the 12th day of Aueust, 1954. in the Fifteenth Judicial Districh SP 4751 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY August Term, 195) Sam H. Ostwalt and wife, Ruby Ostwalt, Katie 0, Newman and husband, H. L. Newman, Sadie Ostwalt (single), Ruby ©. Ostwalt (single), Harold Clark and wife, Lelia J. Clark, Thelma S. Martin and husband, Ernest Martin, and Anna S. Glasco and husband, Jack Glasco, Plaintiffs vs JUDGMENT pomoanv, Gaither Ostwalt and wife, Levy F. Ostwalt, Defendant C. D. Ostwalt and wife, Virginia *, Ostwalt, Callie 0. Orren and husband, J. F. Orren, Jettie 0. Cloaninger and husband, T. R. Cloaninger, Hazel C. Cavin and husband, Fred Cavin, and Thelma Ostwalt (single), Defendants. ming on to ° : Q 0 4 ! 6 1 9 t ' ] ! } Q i This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at his term of the Super lor Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon an appeal by the defendants frou + judgment of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, ad the ir 60 edell court after hearing the plaintiffs and the defendants, and argument of the 4f of the opinion that the said judgment of the Glerk of Superior Court of Ir County, North Carolina, should be affirmed: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the court that the judgment nero eb fore entered in this cause by the Clerk of this Court be, and the same is nereoy erk of j ratified and affirmed in all respects, and this cause is remanded to the o he division of the , aid judgments airect thes this Court, who is authorized and directed to proceed with t descrioed in the petition filed in the cause, in accordance with 8 and notify the commissioners named in said judgment, and authorize a to proceed to divide said lands as directed in said judgment. This cause is retained for further orders of the Clerk of Superior oon? of Iredell County, North C rolina. This the 12th day of August, 195). J. Ge Rudisiil udge es 8 aeanenanneaceaen ea 22 F a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR court SECOND WEEK --------- AUGUST TERM, 195), SECOND WEEK AUGUST wane Thursday, August 12th, 1954 one Thursday, Aupnst 12th. ioe No. i 2 ; re §75 75,00 per month, the court finds that such ayments for the months of J oe 3) ; vers MVUUNS OF vune and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR courr q nly 1954 were and are satisfactory and that the defendant should he mm ” Mant Snou d€ excused @ von making any further support payments for said two months oeriod: J a 4 Meld Ag “9 rs Aa © t inti 4 i. A. Hagle, Plaintiff It is therefore ordered, adjudeed and decreed that the defendant vs. ORDER : ioward Deal be excused from any and al] oO Southern Railway Company, | woe i a elt anes ke Defendant @ -ight have owec atered prior to August 1, 1954 but ing on to he heard before His Honor, J. C. Rudisill, Judee | se sum of $25.00 on or during the n ‘esiding at the August term upon a motion by the plaintiff for leave to file Mm -laintiff the sum of $75.00 per month an amended com,laint: B endar month hereafter for the It is now ordered in the discretion of the court, that th laintif? may nereinabove named, and the fi within twenty days after the adjournment of this term file an amended complaint, jay of September, 1954. giving to the defendant, however, ie rient t fe t rike anv vcortion or The court retains the the wh i, ea Tt h re £ ; ; } he whole thereof. ordered upon a motion made at i hl ee ae — a ,; : "his 12 dav of August, 1954 This the dav of Augus and being heard at is Honor, ee eee prover notice to the plaintif! = — , vdere- ort vayments as heretofore orde: : | phe OO per month. to not more than ad h nths as a fact that during the me = 1104 ; ee f ) ver ©, JUulv, and t the defendant paid to the vclaintiff only 50.00 | = to al all aiean ltt, PAR all ne rather than $75.00 ver month as was heretofore ordered; and appearins ad mM,+S +hea + : . . ~ \ inor ou! nat the aintiff still has now custody of two of the three ™ We < OP po re pe eee celle ee ok ot Charles ldarer har 3 he * : , : s heing Gren born of the marriace of the parties hereto. Said children dein Ne} years and that — noward Deal, Jr., age 16 years, and Grady Allen Deal, age 14 paying to the my wy / 2-00 per month is a proper amount for the defendant to continue inete a fendant -laintiff for their subsistence and support; that in as much as the dete , : : preto helieved that Since his oldest son born to the marriage of the parties he os that it had entered the armed services of the United States in May of 1954 and “ than was proper for him to ,av to the plaintiff onlv %50.00 per month rather TN THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘NOs 5762 «gt CAROLINA ‘No. 5635 NORTH CAROLINA AUGUST aapsLL COUNTY 4UDIA TOMLIN HAGER IREDELI. COUNTY CLAUDIA HAGER VS VS JUDGMENT . , LEWIS HAGER LEWIS HAGER This cause coming on to be heard hefore the indersigned Clerk of Su,erior This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge rresidi t 1 : } . iding at of IredellCounty and itappearing to the Court that all matters and th met ings A Tr . ‘ . . —* : - the August Term, 1954, Iredell Superior Court and it appearing to the court that i ii ~ in controversey between plaintiff and defendant have been comcromis ed, settled action whereby the plaintiff seeks to recover alimony and a property propert and agreed upon and that the plaintiff is desirous of takine a voluntarv non- of the defendant; it a;pearing to the court that all matters and thinss things ue Sully upon and that plaintire ees ere ea ’ an THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJ and defendant have entered into a Deed of Seoaration whereby all claims for ali- . Le same is herehy entered mony, Support and maintenance on the part of the vlaintiff have heen settled and whereby a property settlement has been entered into, and it further aopearing to the court that said Deed of Separat ion should he reference he incor orated into igment and the sare »vroved and confirmed gee “de 5528 ADJUDGED AND DECREED that ih meme eee ATH CAROLI aA jefendant on the 3rd dav of “SULBLL UVUUN } be and the same is by ref wugene Allen, ORDERED, ADJ tling Comvany of and recover , Defendants the ir and equitable to both of ‘his cause coming on to he he A C 2 ae c UN hs WO Cisss a? tirevtes Gaur rth Caroli taxed against the defendant. ee oe Vee j d settle *aring to the court that the by the defendants a : . ° . +7 rrent COntrovers Ps existine hetween them, Wi the .ay! n os Bs i a 00/100 (41,250.00) Dollars te Y CONSEN Sum of One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty 00/100 (41,2 s 7 Vasiti intiff and + Ris Pen nsurance Comoany; Claudia Hager and the Southeastern Fire Insura __Claudiz t Flaintiff es oe — soon motion of At ' *t is, therefore, ordered adjudged and decreed, upon saat er ee ete mm hy take a non-svi irivette, Holshouser Mitchel] *Laugh] 3 intiff b lowed 4 SN¢ I ij 1e | ukhlin ‘ ‘ — smt iff he allowed Attorneys for flainti?tfr ~ and Tattley, that the plaintif laintite ic phon Lewis Hager ‘« he ebyv non-suited. Defendant <i, ; Coins Smith . Clerk of Superior Court es eae a oo ene ge amet : Adams, Dearman & Winbderry Attorney for Defendant caine. iota — of Attorneys of Record “ohn R, McLaughlin fhlin and Battley Ta LS: Sowers S W » °Owers, A ery & Ward / No. 580° NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR coypn IREDELL COUNTY Surry Bulb Company, Plaintiff vs. Halbert F. Crowson and Mrs. Louise C. Crowson, trading as Crowson's Feed and Seed Store or Crowson's Feed and seed Co, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell Ccunty, North Carolina, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgement against the defendants finals ay, earing to the court that a verified comolaint was filed and sum this action on the 28th dav 19543 it further appearing to the court that CO; of said complaint were served on the defendants on the 28 dav of to the court that no answer, defendants and no extension of the time within which :leadings rar +) rro ne to the court reach of ress contract an @Xp! +ho ene sf Four Hindared aa 4k Oo! rou! Mlabiuald TU rest thereon from the 18th dav of October, ; es : : £ fF d, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintill : a ° : . lave Fortyv-e rht and the sum of Four Hundred t ; f ) erest from the 1@th day of October thereon said summons tozether with a cocy : ne 5626 wat CAROLINA gapsLL COUNTY we. Nancy M. Shackelford ahaa Plaintiff, VSe jrm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance Company andFarm Bureau vtual Fire Insurance Company, . Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard hefcre Honorable Car] ‘ ae ‘ vourt that the the Superior Court,and it a, pearinz to ants have compromised and. settled al themselves growing out of an accident ) slaint, by the ,ayment of $100.00 to the -laintiff by th defendants; It is, therefore, ordered, adj the same is dismissed and that the tefendants and that defendants This 195L. 0. 579 4 4 MORTH CAROLINA 1dEDELL COUNTY southern Electric Seryi indersigned this cause coming on 4 ° P a ant ce teg *pearing to the Yourt that the accoun Sta OL$3 that the action that the defendant secured an extension © e " a 8 +his has fafled toanswer or otherwise plead in tn LO ; t 1} hte @ 4 is entitled to the relie soug the plainti That the seems Glan ae ee MN.INMNAED AND DECREED HEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGS) AKD bo from November 1, j 24 $n + est m of S4L8.9L, with inter m : : ‘ - this ction. ‘he defendant is taxed with the cost 0 this @ ‘his kth day of August, 195k. Cc. G. Smith s* Clerk Superior Court ek ke KK OK OF 494 MNo. 5807 9, 5676 ‘a ‘\Ue NORTH CAROLINA eee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i wat CAROLINA ie he ce IREDELL COUNTY 4 wv 4h OUrBA TOR COURT sll COUNTY Sheed dor kk Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, ; Ee a ae Plaintiff ® - sankey Gaither, Jr ) @ of the Estate of VS. ; JUDGMEN T Vs. ) JUDGMENT James G. Clifford, Defendant ) wis Hager andClaudia Hager, ' rtners, trading and doing busi- ti ao ; ; Ter ais ; ann , “tnevship name of , +niS cause coming on to be heard before Honorahle (C. (0. am: n ess under the = . es norable C. G. Sm th, Clakof the trredell Furniture Company, Defendants. or Court of Iredell County, Narth Carolina, upon motion *v the laintire “or judgment against the defendant James G. Clifford by default fina}. Thi ise i to he } , nals This cause coming on to he heard, and heine hearg vefore C. GC. Sete ‘7 A 3 : ° : : : re ‘oo Ns ser Anc it appearing to the court that a summons i i 4 i ° ppe ing t 1e cour nn sum! was issued in thi ; Q : ( jel] Ct 1 i aS issued in this action on ff the Superior Court of Iredell County. Nor+h farciie eed : Ve t , \ i sarc] na, ant . a ocearine tr ‘ the 25th day of June, 1954 and that a corv of ae : st fd ; Ji 9 +794 ma tn COpy oO Said Summons and copy of Apni; , ra) r : -Opy ol Applica- urt from the statements of Cr. - Winberry, Attorney for the taint > 2 p . . a : - : on “or sxtension of time to file Comolaint, showine the t t nsion : ] ns int, sg wines tne nature and purpose of ve Ittorney fo def . ‘7 as ! and purpose of itchell, Attorney for the de endant, viaudia Hager, and the statement of tha +hiae anti + f° : : nis action, and co;y of Order extending the time for filin . » and copy rd 3 nding tne time for filing complaint to + 7 Lewis Ha } ] 4 CO 4aint to the efendant , Lewis nager, that all matters an thines ar nz in the above ‘ . 4. 1+} 4 ge oy cy } lLOth day of July 195 were served on defendant James 4 “15 fF fara } ce} Ja V5 24 Y s ¢ n e: endary vames & ond “7d n th St aned . . - : 7 7 ’ “ © on ne 25th tion have een fullv and completely settled ey avrent of the rincivoal a f i 34 a ag lay of June 7 r lieu of con actin © » £794, If lieu © mplain ond 00) + i } lai PP : : ae court cost, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntar non- “ And it further aopearing to the court that a verified comolaint was filed TTS Ty PORE DERET HIDE nT 44.7 © fied 46-40, -NONEPORS, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DSCREED that thie act ior é on the Sth day of July, 1°54. and Order for Servic e Bearnitntet a Nn day 9 2754, and O: r tor service of Complaint was duly issued sme is herehy nonsuited and diermiceed arA +} laintiff 4 1 sw ame is herehy nonsuited and dis sed, ar he ;:lair Ss taxed with the cc Sn +h Aad >) Pia ee THEI 3 & as ) | } } 7 T 1] on th 1 day of Julv, 1954 and returned on said date hv the Sheriff of Iredell ‘O8t. Jounty marked WAftar due and dilisent search JJ ‘ A 1seF I nat + h foun my » . , ; “Od, ar dt nd diligent search James G lifford not to be found ic ¢ ae iw 1 e U © inis the n dav of Auzust, 1 . in Tenateat 1) Sian “ ar y ee ° . ° : ° t . 7: -n dreceil County, N. C. Subject is suvposed to he residing in South Carolina," Ge Smit res amet 5 . ae lvanalt sLEOrK OC ou rior vor C 1€ J and it further appearing to the court that plaintiff caused affidavit to founty ai No Ww I4 an, 2 a aD \ : : 3 i hh ¢ ade and filed showing tnat said defendant cannot . after due diligence, be Onsented ¢+ne > VeevVVU Ye Fey } ‘ + } Dis as a go on ra, . ss : ss ° : : : F Naneh Cund in the state of North Carolina, in compliance with the orovisions of North See. Winkswce i _— ® se iii “es 4 ¥ tre ‘- 2-1 a cd - . + 5 : ° ° : . 3248 + ina ‘weneral statute, Section 1-12]3 and it avpearing that in addition to samnisanna with whe il is " " . . . 7 o = £. Ompitance with the requirements of said General Statute Section 1-121, plain + & Mitchel) ttorne fo i . . waa ~» AU ) nN wr yr tne © €ndant 4 ae ee ' Repi iT . ee , . want, Llaudia Hager tiff, by Registered Letter mailed to Mr. James G. Clifford, 70 %ethel Stree . cs ; b 7 y f ———_Lew s aver \ v 1+ h v " sme rt . s * £ r ’ oe WY ’ 11V \ to ] - _ Clover, South Carolina, Receipt No. 57, Postmarked Statesville, N. C., July 1, “18 Hager, Defendant > ‘ 2 i 10¢ n ; ° ws ° . Inly O5L3 179%, enclosed copy of verified complaint filed on the 9th dav of July, 1954: 7 3 further : } : ther And it irther appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or otne leading have been filed hy the defendant James G. Clifford and no extension 0 leading has heen granted and that time within which pleadings 8 ne filed has ex ire is , ‘se wo : FORTY And it further a;pearing that plaintiff has received the sum of FOR?! / ny wy Ate ann a : 4 btea- (40.00) DOLLARS from defendant James G. Clifford as pavment on the indeote ea f° * , . ° ° } e of ness of #1,190.29, as set forth in its complaint, leaving a balance now du $1,150.47" " 100; - : : . ® ° ‘ 1,19 029, as set forth in its complaint . leaving a halance now due of arr TT th ee ; 4 tiff hav NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plain’ ’ . + ’ Mt t i ONE Ht i and recover of the defendant James G. 3lifford the sum of ONE PHOUSAND ical alicia j i i a ‘eon ‘from March 4» DRED FIFTY & 29/100 ($1,150.29) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from ™ 1954, and the costs of this action. This the 11 dav of Aueust, 105), we ok oe oe oe ote oe oe oe eee < 3 se Oe >< 3¢ a Ve CAROLINA THE SUPERIOR COURT I Gf rl COURT yr Nim Wig somone 4 iRBNU We : hel ( ‘ading as eause coming on to be heard and being heard at the Augus ' of ae i ec ata rn WONT STEEL County Superior urt before His Honor, defendant after cro; and su nth jefendant 1905L and that day o 4 ey —— trdsvidually ana trac maintenance said minor fenryv oO. Leonard, 4% 4 : oe Ae as ar a9 ‘ $ / svision now rema 4 payable on th , da} n , Civil No. 1174, Asheville Divis ayment to o¢ > and | 2 on © ' in my office. ™ . ‘ sayment The Cow retains the right to increase or decrease the pa: 4 fave, ordered ucon a motion made at anv subseanent term ef *ns ¢ a day of A IN TS&STIMONY WH seal of the aforesaid mr S { mY 2 “hos. 4. inodes S Grave ° A 3 . T Clan ———_. HM irs. George BD. ovevens : waerk, WW -) stevens & Co. : 2 Ao oh . . By M. Louise vs i ‘ Ls OU] SE sor ° lyderment memento ee! oo UL ¢ , 4a . e lite, Gl ra y wiser , A : + In rn . k, ee Goodni zh 9 JT e and . , e ; ’ : : x ife, Margaret ;00dnigh : $4 ¢ a Mp, 4 ae sry 4 + } hae fn H C | This cause comin® on C ‘ nea r¢ +h onorah] a ( H LROL \ : i at : le, Carl G. : as ing © oR I ( x y a oh . sy CnriYrt f . 7 ’ the Supericr Court rede]] “Ann Al “ ‘ he Superior © or | 7) Ce : nk i ies 4 7 4 ti ° : ; > ) a ft 1-7 in * iment against the defendants hy dea as e nale . q " q I s . ; "7 ] C r 4H0 a\ IS r And it appearing to the Court tha: p i ’ . T ~ ( “ ne : ' z . = 4* 4 4 wo I \ ; 4 | i? semons issued in this action on t! 2 1 ! . . - . nq - + thar aon and a Paring ( | se T ( a e 4 \ . 4 sa Ld ° ¢ : ~¥y Ta + Ol Said cc lain were Served naar si ; ; enue | - ee wd a1) OF OnD ' A ° + ~ ° sie . he : And t nN Y qa earine a ’ e ading nas ] hi tr . Cc a ay q th - ) ~ r heen Pranted ar _— ins : a! C r oa C ar] irc m, n 4 l . a4 - a ‘ . e + , : ra ® Pore - ~ ’ C y ive ¢ +h S erio? nn, ’ Shambers 4 AY b 2 a . +} tn a? ¢ } + - ‘wr 7 9 ‘ S 0 n+ a. — a a , r r ’ ay < Aug it El n Ofecloc . Me, that the a ‘ ‘ the ; : ner r r nto tf leralit of onment. = r act, 9r 0% a? + ~¢ } in - ticht ‘ 1a ( oe - . ' 249 r. Now, tk ‘ o : . Wiad 4 z . a , ° . cuseremmemamemennastigelemenesese Lan eel eee - = Ve fe 4 . " , ‘ . oe fcover of + Pt oe Pe y lz C tn rie Y A 4 ‘ y or : r a 59 q > na Tr onmr . of ++ tione ¢ ¥ ° rv ost ( on. » ] 735 Ar + - +} s ye +ho ¢ ” S ( co -*+ na or f ana ii : , ° . , . . ‘ ee oF “ce tira aes res — ea rd , ! ; ‘ ‘ Ue Vill ess, le 80 rT ——— - TTD ps3 be | eG ,UUN CARI vA l wkd, oC J 2 . 0a , : la‘y £4 ’ ° . “VS. . ° tj : ’ . Uv i \ - JU 4 ii rei ohe PS ° { h rr ; } %, , . > } : : je nNodan+ ® } lant. : i Sais i n “~ } f g Ca + ’ “a e eb nooere nan 7 rey oO? ou ( iW Coming on to be heard befor me UNnGerets! om ii » and - ° 1 ‘ chae thea ctior has 4»pearing to the Court that the Cou! hat the a ] } > ; } ¥ ’ , “se 40 b ; . . ; 1. j hat +he ac ior ne one ] r GitGvOnRS Ordered, adjudged, and decreed tha ne a : a Cost e | 0 the } : * ; r) Plaint ‘fr. j { i PD ih Court 10 T r , ’ I have hereunto subscribed at Asheville, N.C se tris 20t As th aay of July, - mv name : ame and affixes the bs A wv an 03 : ‘nth Carolina edell County This 18th day of August, 195k. C.Ue Smith Clerk superior Co urt pam Ty ap paar oe oe * oe a aT ee ai oe Sex Sees V# 5816 NORTH CAKOLIN IREDELL rPeooles J T oO t Pr. Gr sleanor .. 7) v +A 4A 4 iJ Gill aG ° T onal _ > a ._o > +. stat +} Fa) at $ ce + a ~ + on f Le Ca Ss ¢€ + ’ Qa re 4 he h COUNTY Loan and Savings Bank, -VS- 7,Ayr nda 4 4 ti 4 tt 5 ie wrieé wife Wii, ~ , is cause nd it a LO. ne +} A ne 5 , ~ eh 4 t} Wha J ‘ | a’ Y mo 2° . 4 ’ WJ sAvJY ‘ : Y é ay ( ’ lar } +2 + - + ry cf 4 . 4 ¥ y aint 3 V9 4 at ‘ aA n+ A ( nore! comi ear 1d the Defendants $ ¢ + ry ne to thi 1 THE SuPRRETO IN THE SUE 4alOR COURT oo : . Plaintiff, : i : a . q . UDGMaSnnr me NAN ar ‘ JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT “a . 4 F ‘ : Lefendants. : nr " + h 29rd hafan + : on oO e heard } erore he unders Lened Clerk of Su wi Ouperior } Court that all matters and AI Raw , 1iiterences her, ces be etween thaam have hea nN set tlede and ? 2e! ) Ga ana n r Orly wae ; 4 no oroperty was taken under 4 Ulle a 2] iveryve Ga 1 ° . - lav of luonst 7 - OU, J bie +e Je omith — a ; sLerk ou-erior Court J re) .t 4 , ) , 4 aine f \ Lait a ) j j vou 4 / n= . j . a ; efand ~ + J iant.e ) > Comine on to hy 1 and beine ses e, th ndersier ror ” = 4% ’ 9 + C of Irede] Yountyv and it a.cearinz to the Cour B Tr o)] 7 -+ > ait ouneek shat ai) aettees th ceeoukes bene sak eaeetitt a 3 reor ett] sAl ron OPW c ; anar ns e , +h ayment t , ‘ , a i a9 payvmer tr *y} inf a - . » * ‘on ac r he to the la + f¢ and that th laint I na + As _ ‘ . ie a . : +tor 4 ( ol rn ary ions + disn ission? this ac 0 a y o + i rit ‘ Lace and demands arising ovt of the colli on desc nod + a+ +} Pandan 44 1 : , Ga wild ay the costs. “( vy PONeon?t + nenen A TINT MT NeCREED: F rg Cc ° S UNUSNInD, ADJUDGED AND Ds DABS s h re [fy . 4 ms an f rint f e and he herehyv jis none ia and all claims at rn Gain? e 3 Y ‘ miwm mace . Sen . a 9 in 3 t 3 ( Cc tn collision described n tn sompialn f a4 ‘ime fe . are ’ mi ed and 4 orever t arread. efen nt wil a+ } nda ee av tne costs. C. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Iredell County Court ; CONSENT : wie T. Harbin we Te Harbin, Plaintiff ia ao gauss DEARMAN & WINSERRY 1, Dearman “intiff's Attorneys ‘laintl D we RR ENTER & WE slen $ . Web b rrormeys for the Defendant #12 (2TH CAROLINA aneTT ANTINTV USL UUUWL ¢ nm n leert F. Crowson and : R . E : ° : ° : . : -vs- ; : ° ° tf : nl. Qwens $ : ° $ nls cause coming on to he . ee 294 vt Or iredell | ,OUNTYV and t Sh hak : +} 4 . T af tuted in this Court June 2 ‘ ; the Defenrant+ Tohn |] ( J answer or otherwise plead in ] : 4 Te fw } - i apoears to the ane i fg + it is therefor, ordered age at he ; © tayed +h +b rost ¢ a2 cs e eo day of Aueust 105, ~e - se . o a, A Pa =~? . 5 ’ = 7 4 w\ D , i 4 n fore +h ndereion $ i S 2 ( > +o th nim #tae * ; ‘ oY ’a 1 Y On Ss rmons ar con ne . ) J > + M aw aa he te fn ‘ . ~+ v ofor ve ’ ’ f + +oroat Fran lanuary 7 nui ae . a+ ++ 1 wt Yornoy aor , a, a ia ove I atains +} Son + + rar Tar > } 7 ea C a i ° ntiar C . wi +) Ve Je J — 5 7 : a+ er} ) erior ¢ a vi 5798 NORTH CAROLINA Mm , Y + IN THE SUPERIOR COURT she plainti¢e IREDELL COUNTY JRT plainti now VUUNIL . weegpited and taxed with the costs. Willie Click ) , saa 16 27 1 f August 05h Plaintirfr This 2 th day O° ; ’ ] be VS. JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT an Ny 4 a C. Ge. Smith ) , SAULT AND INQUIRY 4 ‘lerk of Superior Coute———— a ‘MErIOY Cour Hugh R. Bryant 7 4 tot - ‘ig on) t ) Defendant ) Be sented to: a ala : : : Ge zyer W. Finch :Nls cause coming on to be heard before the H ab Cae Bx TPP t t Onorable C. G, smith, Cler; “torney for the !laintif } . aY4 . ’ , } % ; NI ( s of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon motion by the a a snr - 44) w ; } p } : ; plaintiff for judgment against the defendant Oy default and inquiry; Bb: 7 1: vam AADN NI ; ; : 2TH CAROLINA And it appearing to the court that a verified com. lain+ was f3 room NT . I vs > t COm,laint was filed and Oe 23DELL COUNTY 4 4 OUrBRIOR CC 4 Summons issued in this action on the 17th day of June, 1954: 4 :BComcanv, Inc. of : nd it further : cx a ee ; atesville, : ice Meme an nearing hh in d summons. + +} +4) i And furtner appearing to the court that said summons, together witha ™ Plaintiff, : covy of said complaint, were served on the de fendant on the 18 lay of June 15M “VS- : na + v ’ 7 eS . J i And it further a;vearing to the court that no answ *, demurrer or other me. . Fox and wife, : eles ; sec tae eos lanche Fox, : ading has n filed bh: 1€é aerendant and no extension of time to file olea Defendants. : 3 n granted and that the time within which pleadings may te filed has ex raga This cause coming on to he heard t) nde cre 1 ; 4 S. *t srefc » Ordcerec, adit deed, and decreed that the plaintiff have and: wurt of Iredell} County ana t = 29 ner tc he OU? at « mon ’ recover mment against the defendant fer such damazes as a ry may award, a thof the 4 ndants, and that more than thirty davs ha: la ne it inguiry ¢ amount of such damage be execut at the next civil terr c tice, and no answer has been *!] herein; ) ( scurt of Iredell Count: efore a ry to determine the amount c It further ayvear +} + shar 4 ndant we 4p ted ¢t : t furt! a ars to the Cc 4 a é . sa lamaces. aintiff in + sum of 3340.4 interest fry } 3 r i . . ‘ +e , - “wp = ’ = 25t aay of August, l 4. 4O, UNE, Ordered, adiudged, ar creed tha n lair Sa te mkt - ment arainst tr Defendants for t} sum of v3l Os, NitN nt t ( vlerk of the o rior Court +4703, until .aid, and that the Defendan’ tax h the cost of t v This 26 lay f ine : . 7 * ia ¢ A \ - « . : Sih i cl saisitiiiibiaeichnentienntnn: pterk S rior Court ° ) F i DG ; Adie os " cee fia vANOLINA ‘ > Y ar I THE SUPERION Of ' . : Wail C , verenda ) ( + rable ie ha ; ‘ , cain Honorable » Marpe Morriearn “ g . z on to heard and being heard before the hone "e Jp or ri8on and Frank L. ’ : +o the cc cas smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing 00 » retitioners ) . raintiff does © vs JTuDG BN fron * tat nt « the attorne for the pla ntiff that the lainvii . ) DG 1 +A x “hie Oh bil : has elected 0 “"RME.”*© Shaw Hinshaw x if to proceed with the above-entitled act on, and that he has elect 3 “{0WSki and pShaw, Nancy Sharpe } *<0WS kj ond iSoand, Edward Leo ; a non-suit in his action as ahbove-entitled: ar » “Nd Sarah Elizabeth Defendants ) Q the un ~ It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, i$ Cay 5 ‘ + ’ Y hefore William 3S vOourt on the report of the Referee, Wil btions to the refereets report - Sharpe, dr.3 and decreed that th ‘ - filed by the attorneys for * Marvy h wn Neel, Esquire, and ar; undersigned Judge o The court, after reading the pleadings and report of the rer It is, therefore, ordered and adiudeeg st ! - = Yr ferac : . 7 and ft f. < and evidence in the case as found hv the referee he fae ee rereree, and the exceptions to the refers revort filed in the cause, the court renders the following iudemen+ “ +f JUGements a aoreafter in which to file counter-case or a : ‘ ; j ° as 7 oe An ‘he court considered the exceptions of Mary Sharre Morrison and MMM ea) Bond is fixed at ©150.00. : t t MON} 1 and F . a This the ° dav of Septemher. 105) ind ! ' ws % « pay Se eee te Nes oy ; f ; “er onarpe, Jr., Nos. 1, 2, 3 and kL and jiudicially determined that all or me : shic 1 OT the $4 A I aid : ’ y a a exceotions should he overruled ‘he court herehy a: i s ° ne )Y r) rg oroves Confir e . . I iTms and ado te Aas ites own in all resrects the roa we f « Fa) i - ¥ 4a ~ as € —) ~~ ‘ < e i ) ort o he referee as set forth in hi sa vi IN IS said ro-, * Tt ic thoratnros ~ ro 5 S40, 1 b 36 herefo ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defena- vi } ndant, Sarah wnt iza?r } < nr) mm : Iiusn “lizabeth Sharpe, have and recover the sumof Three Thousand One tuna th Carolina mof Thy -nousand One Hundred 93 3. EAGPCA O1Xty--one MMM “ojel] Count v ly . fa ’ ea s ; ' 3 cu YY (49 947 ”AI n.9 sre . i and 01/100 (33,161.01) Dollars from the funds withheld hy the conmiece: 9 TMiISSiloner fror me sy Cross Stallings f me osry Cross otallir ‘ ie at rar gas os ‘ \ — ¢ on uv n the sale fF the sai v ] on I sal © i saia ropertyv. 4 V ‘ VS ce 3 lav of — + Arr er, 1¢ j R. Stallings r . - * a9 3 ~a x ud sill ¥ ‘his matter comine on +o “ meet it nis 2 sOomine n r . 1 ; f t t ! J ] Z : i a sales 5 0 ne a nrtn 4 ao jl ¢ ea Yano, * 4 * ~ > ‘ ’ : C : h ord ne adove cause that the refer appointed in this : : : ‘ ; " ; mer DR} 7 ' bs - 4 . +4 ay Oe e ¢ 27a tne siim ¢c ee tc his ea “3 : = li — . ° 4 I ( <z e r ‘o as Gian wr a ' ate hae a ia : y are + tho n+ f¢ b 1 ana 1a rs, llicent Lynn, the stenocra:her at the refere hearing. be ca as OY O UI a ‘ nN the cr . ° q Par her e eo \ : 2.3 ell Su.er ourt ar a Co hor Cort, n > , ‘ c oa - SA P } r ( . ( n S ES. OTN © said sumrs tc e aid ou" of tne proceeds “ Se al a tia | . tal ier has file th thie saunk « O! ale ¢ ea] rooe: » and the cost of this action to he taxed by the , ; a 7 . erk, Nadi LItv to comr]1s A the c re ratter. a e + < 2 + ow on vvCi ~ < — 4 © Je ‘ ~ ’ . . . -_+ ’ Toeace ne A Ae it c ~ , Cc } ronth © ar + 9) f . + ' we arolina jf oe . in the o rior ourt ’ ’ y na re rr OY ay nk : ( 4 | non re ¥ + yuna t € 2 { , " * ‘ , Y ; ’ — < ‘ ; 4 ICE 4 iY ) i? a y Ate or 5 ' iW, ii. ' uv naants. ( hie AA et ee in ‘ . 4 " es 9 ' : +4 esid 3 ( or C heard hefore Honorable Jd. C. diy : = x eas oe * ws . : . fe 4 saring to oF rt A ¢ i ‘ dq ai VIStY ne ‘ n *h arr ers, and A 2ar i hat . aie CLIme, i c ? rC » ne ] > iaf l ‘ ; 4 € ¢ One We De f i, As ree, 10, n@ 7 r c t er wit C to ti Cc t ar hat exce:tions were filed the et ners, eEexce ’ ’ ; P|? et eo or ' Cc = and idement of the tafaroao affirmed, as s 0 Juagment of the Courts and ae s . : findings it appearing to the Court that the vetitioners excepted to the finwis te Court oni ‘ + e » — am 2 . . : : 4 d au and Coy Luis ons Q* law oe nd Kher #hoa Referee and sustained bv tnis ” supreme Court of North Carolina and further notice was waived we days in which to file case on appeal an that d the exce, + ‘ae , + { . c the Nerti+r3 ; - loners he gsiy p ) ePrAannan+ . = aan s are oj yen ttione ons. = Me. UO TES 11 ne eee a hk ” c +2 _— —_ ———— =. residine .jy Age ae eC Ay a + 4 C - d y P 29 \ . + . : - e + OY ~*@ . . . + a ne Y ant Y ‘ hoa os - a . y ” ¥ ° > . . . ‘ _ om "ne + ‘ . i YNORTH CAROLINA CABARRUS COUNTY State of North Carolina, laintiff yond Milstead, - sane a f* Plaintiff, VS. : c tar Lugene weoster, ‘wie Torrence wis .Orrence, o Defendant << ee te ee . ad ‘ Defendant comings on t hy ‘ ee F o ” —s 1e ble This cause coming \ ~ + . ++narreay the stateren © atwvor! contorversyv have } een Qa’ andoned oy ta c take a nons ordered, ‘udted and decreed that the vclainti the costs he charced fv the Clerk. “ he action tled +4 en r ye +c ec. Ji Pe ee qank, justrial In co r-t ” tate han Er Ord his ) q A nere 0 ort Se ‘ovide forac ner ‘+, the man [ln int la ra ~_— | wr retro aw, 1” 1 mrver ‘ +e oe 1¢ reto +} ing a wa) acre © fendant tered Ae anc ant y a one ee eae a f f t Vii 5815 NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY tii leo IREDELL Ralph A. Stradley, t Plaintiff, ( a and wife, } Pete D. Alice 4 or. and N arv Ravrer, Raymer, and wife a Rae D. havmer naymer, , me 5 Verendants. * »L +he- e ’ + . 1 9 4 K O né 2 ¢ s€ € st CUCL sC¢ » Ing n + +} a+ amen? yf ¢ 4 C a > ¢ se . ar , Y + wre ad » + 7 + ee 3 diy , Attanevs for the olair . » Y m ¢ NAaVvrer ar ‘ ep, + rrnetw Navi a . & © 17 - yore ay mer an +h "on aint ras e + ] } + } endant 9 > 2” ~ ~ + - ~ > Ion nt n+ rs y = y 4 “Oe “rr 3 ¥ no + _+ + qin+teiFf Ine ( ( - , “* ‘ a 4 4 4 ° Aa Js 4 rauV y ° ’ > A J 7 , a 2 ° . v . 7 . ~ a. = . . . ¥ ¥ a i ne cr . e Le . 4 re oN . Sra In the oul ey i or Court 582k at ILINS - v m OAR(} + ORTH CAROLINA, r Yn +ha a . 3efore the Cler} In the Superior Court si Vt rK , 3 . TrNIT Vv / -Q2DELL CG UNiIle ava Laura T. Harris ) rs, Laut 7 . ‘ } } Reco ay \ Plaintiff, } \ vv } { { i Se / \ + 2 ae \ = - - _ — NA par ie a / JUDG GNI OF |] ONSUIT ee es \ arvey Harris, ge ‘ De endant. } T) rar \Fy haa . ws = 5 = Inis ma r nea 2T Ore Or, ds Gs disill y - , A959 + x ’ - nde + YATE mY r c f y + a) at the I E11 VOUT , ’ ’ a ne hear efore ~ : 5 ze Oo! ve Me oMmltn, grolina on an a lication fo ° 2 y ndan? } . n+ vy Kerth ee . . ’ P m wo na, and 1t avpea 9 earinge +c + Watbh ane at + > AY Wala nne r Cc the vy 2 77 ats © AQGams, Uearr rt of ]j >) ont aAraine+ +r ‘ ie ae and tha ws + 9 a A i statonen 0 Ae Of Ravmer c¢ ly 23 10: ay hat 2 7C “ v ~ vmey id ae a » a ¢ AY he f — 4 7 4 \ 1 nda » that all matter: efendant on the sare day: tha’ r n this action have heen fully cor- Plans ne : . - “ a ne ha +h laswnei FE o} fe _ 10n9 } r 1 ( I air the amount 22 1726, Wnen tr e“endar aha r uY 3 ; all matters an hings arising unc zart from here and it ¢ ° Y 2 a , , this action: and it furher a £54 ve 5) dave ; ce icin a A a } ° S$ to take a Oluntary ronsult: An t further a , , +e a ' 2 De Ji ‘ Sinn » Aiik wid 230 les on * 5 3 + Ss: c re - 4 5 - > mY 7 7’ y ECREED th s action be, and ter hea - 1 the lence ar . , nsel, - ai . axed with the cos. llowir anh ee ° hat lon la -y~ ae tb ’ me C , r reece OEE encant: a tha the laénr F fe entitl a at = OS Or ae ; i r of J f 4 irt oO + eves Sint ounse] nd ort that * vit sor P +o o: r 9 - +, + y ; : . ; ; c 4 . sar ‘ ar al de VUTEC s Se aintiff t ars ‘Kor re al 4 ( ay a a i ang C ( “ ‘ aly | . , . Oh. hat / ’ ar 5 ants | 6 ty: Le } ’ montt ay sne C ws r rr . ; 4 , ound Ul ¢ Ue aot , ° : ’ nr i JeUN EGU. J ve ‘, ur | e ( Us er 4) Vwi wv Vis 4 a yr? a A +h lian £2 Ie a* + no a nt C : 4 le defendant a € — r c r a ‘ wmrer tc ma ( bh neo S 2a ia ( Z ‘ ) er mor . i + » ob Ale +n ar nc sin month oa defendant shall pay to ¥- Sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) to be ered ° This Cause is retained for in the Supetor Court a fned and entered hn “8rolina on August 11, 1954. ited on of a ve in Dearman, 4A ‘ Faaec counsel Ss. further orders. Iredell County, Sta . : 4 J. C, tudisill — Tidsill. Juagre ne we 2 . the Fifteenth Judic: tes holding al “4 _ —_ = ,0ourts Di st rict ‘ To the signing of the nN wnien to 4 are ana fe aw y hich to serve nt > y the- ~ ty f oO e ( 4 OY WwMm)1er 12 10) 4 A s Ge a * VOUT 4 INA suid sit Ld a2 2Ar ~ 2 r . ” 2 ¢ y cf , ‘ < a7 at 4 ris . ° . > . 2 4 ) ea? J "Hor +} ‘ ‘ . » CLOr at f ni ° r ic r } y 4 f lic ’ . A ‘ a7 C c arc ‘ eh 2 rea T 1.94 . aced r Lredqdelid ,0unt* ‘e Valr as n otatesy cf ‘ J . Ana anotne warrant ec ie + Fa) s . Larceny of a Suverior Dairy ~ la fa 1 cetfendant 1S now confir foregoing findings of fact and th A ' 1 y + a+ 4 Qn 74 LJ 1a . ; ar nq order, the Defers... ‘40 defendant aamitS tMal ne is guilty in these + “6 thee ou 3 WO Cnarge De | WOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered and adjudged thet eh. e... in open Court gave notice of : y vey Che former judgment of i ¢ appeal to th 2s Oo Sucre yobation be revoked and that the said Sentence of eichte- (1a) e ap,-eal bond is fixed at One |} ne Sundred Dollars +o be assigned to work under the supervision of the 3 Ue by consent and vac fe oA gs. 7 i. a | y consent and orderof Court 7} ; Uy allowed thirty orks Commission heretofore Suspended ts ordered i - ; WO! IMLS © ° AE 2 raereaq to ef erve case on appeal and the Plaine; . C i si 1A FIPS ares oy ° ° Muir thirty de; ordered issued. his prisoner to be confined in Youth Can ¢ Y ercase 0? exce ot ons ° Mp, + if 5 rs This the 14th day of Seytemher . roe. *f of Trada } + 4 4 ii Coun at Tee J VT 7 a s le, lort y c 4e Rudisil) ee nemo 4 . aca T a a ce ae a 4 tet sii: - 0. Rudisill | ’ Sa ae eee ee we Y 1018S sdea u Fy peeeees J. C. Rudisill, Judge Holding Cassia 4spa¢ Y “ne ‘ ft aanth lnadtatal ne 7¥ licial Dietrin rapmty? AADAT THA © r * 7.6 ‘ ’ Vili CARC LINAS Y +heo 2KYinn Yn ! o { ( OOnET nprrsimy IREDELL C( i nana 6) has * id ERIOR AL RT ” 28 } , ‘ ne FalrdankS vVLompany, y poe 797 @ corporation, 4 ; . “ , h i La » + Ee i . ’ . i/ la 4 .4 a J 4 Ui , ce enema 794 i ptatesy lle 5 7 Jor ayer a 4 ° cAPnaRat 2 Ae i a corpora on, y ¥ q ’ AY a7 ne Nea, at he se Oterher a lefer ant. } + é > *na y Yo , lo ras ro lve resid ” ‘ ’ his caus comings or C neara, ar n¢g heared, e tne r A . r t 4 : % aS a viodiat an P ot - Pr ’ ¥ ‘ a at T. 7 arn] we C i ~ C © ¢ ( ° C a I'¢ - 4 4 sire wa Jourt by "0 - ets 4 4, On motion ¢ a ’ a am an 9 4 ’ 0.39 ‘ in C r 4 5 tne [follow agintsien i i 2 ae ’ ryment } ault I 9 aY % @ 4 ne v< Ourt: C a é sounty Ss rior Court befe Aine, Uf : nar 2fendant was - had . . , + a 7 Q+ “ 4 h a y fp ~ 2 r 2 y . i az * i ° 4 a ~ > 4 } ~»¥ ~ + i: rt S 7 ] } yr ] i ‘ h on he yOu ® ahowe ~~ 7 + = J action, t ° C 3 y ( 1 on Rid ti rned to work u nty . } 7 mor nr this entenceé : ork ot fe 1S Se! aZa 9 5 + fr 3 > . ac larc Y rooa on C my > - P } - — sis , . j at summons Vas . ed from this Cc t on ove,te ry 20, 1954, Ue e -¥ nr C +h; o th a 5 | na rro ausvV yreri fen a4 , 3.4 ; ; a _ 3 } Ia . Aeii VLOUNTV, and was re rnabd as c Law. . “ » 4 na ti the sual condit ons oT re ation al i a 103 mn al [oa ae ee 7 e later than 10:0U ° m is ’ é ound n url > places ia ville hat +} , ' t— Sande v * Lear Ue y wl ' . "at the summons was served on the defendant ou Lean, ¥ Lrede) ’ F . ‘ Sh +h jlefendant ac Vy 4011 Ont es ny 104) + leayv , W n n i BU a /OUNUTV, ON Se,tembder eal, 1Y54, leaving WwW ° i4¢jions ¢ = ‘endant hae vidated the conditi ian 7 1a nas vida ] 1e@ C he summane : : - ad ae SUMMOrY S, together with a copy c the complainte } g ay:t ’ os — : iefendant was °: : — 1 the tin 4 ae ~4 lis apiet OG), + is aeien nae « ‘ ‘ " + extended ana aq aay ¢ August, 195hL, A : “ae he time for the defendant to answer waS not extender, Tarren 2 ‘ pares” 9)) : +e@ & ALIA - » ~A ‘) nsw.’ ntering 40wed hy } has now ela sed, and no ans * a4 rn ahare sf Rreaking,. & ‘ ail on a charge o reaking, 4 ; —- 4aw for the defendant to answer + an ugus* 6°) eke . if + . leat fF +h4 fFense de ng A Jrrap ‘ 5 +4 Ga 8 defendan e Date o his o ens r, Other pleading or motion has been filed y the a € gnteri® - . QK2 . rohationer with Breaking, ing July 31, 19%: Wek dat of this offense sel reine +his bi 0 hore ake in the Iredell County Jail nnable to m ” guper*° awaitine trial at the November lerm of rt That the verified complaint filed by the laintirr oie laintirt demands a op SPY LA/ / ae entre “A money Sue Tor meranendtee Aetd Wad G6liverkd Go. the defeat ee EEDA ELKA/ Ch6/ bib / E/E ALLEL Gh USLLAEA/ Kb/ th6/ bbb de ALL AK AE /1PKL/ tract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum statement larked " ibj " 4 Statement, marked "exhibit. A", was a ‘tached oo am mess in hic . Fay +. LAP > nt, which statements set forth the merchandise Purchased -e HALOO// OK / KEL / BRE AL ete » f +h ion ‘ + bébé GhG/EF/EL/ GL BAALK/ / AAA // db A/ b/-/ Lb f/ BAALLLEL GA pe Lk ising out o he transaction. TT ELLIE LEE OR LALLA!) a 1 LAS 554 He/she purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and Contained a): #5E3L the duly sen com;lair iff, on account any, vine Cents |, : r annum from Apri] taxed by the Court. jon? and decreed that the charced hy the Clerk. Cc. G. Smith we Clerk C f Superior 4 . a ea \ + tor str A a \ Q > © . @ f. get 2 j ry be ia! im from Jan 4 (1, 659-b1), © nn 8 ’ a SES At SAREE Ie a ea oro a eee NO. 5432 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK Germann-Compton Motors, Inc : JUDGMENT vs. i Sam A. Brown & Laene W. Brown | This cause coming on to be heard and being leard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that they be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjidged by the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff py the costs of this action. This the lst day of January, 1954. a i erk Superior Court een KKeK KKK KKK Ke HK sort CAROLINA REDBLL COUNTY Be it remembered that A Superior Court begun and held in and for the County FIRST WEEK ----- NOVEMBRE Monday, November 8, foe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ERM, 195, 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 ud State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the &th day of jovenber, 1954, at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where His Honor, J. C. Rudisill, judge Presiding and Ho&ding Courts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District of jorth Carolina, Fall Term, 1954, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. forris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial istrict of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J, ¢. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and opened Court by order of the Court. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredeli County returns into open Court the umes of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this the fovember Term, 1954, Iredell County Superior Court, for the first week, to-wit: 3, K, Hoover Glenn Money i, W. Jones fenneth A. Wilkinson its. Flossie G. Frye i. C. Perry John W. Howard Johnnie B. Moore i. C. Summers i. M. Loyd 3. 1. Snow hy Waugh G. S. Hines Mrs. A. C. Rumple J. L. Sharpe H. L. Little Robert Wilson R. A. Wilson H. E. Sherrill Henry E. Stevenson James E. Davis C. E. Pope J. T. Overcash Roger C. Niblock William C. Pickett C. E. Verble Hal Harrison J. Rex Campbell Louis G. Bowles G. D. Pierce H. B. Sherrill Clarence R. Williams R. B. Parker Robert W. Wilson Bruce Alexander D. Neil Morrison BK. Hoover, J. L. Sharpe, Henry E. Stevenson, and D. Neil Morrison were excused by Court. ‘ohnnie B. Moore was excused because he was in service. tobert Wilson was not served. i B, Sherrill was out of the State. lobert Bg, Benfield was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. ' B. Goforth was sworn as Officer in charge of the Grand Jury. NO. 5432 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK Germann-Compton Motors, Inc ' vs. | JUDGMENT Sam A. Brown & Laene W. Brown | This cause coming on to be heard and being leard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that they be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being allowed to take @ voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff ry the costs of this action. This the lst day of January, 1954. eee ee toe erk Superior Court eee eee ee Ke eK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- NOVEMBER Monday, November 8, ise on IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 yoRtH CAROLINA Be it remembered that A Superior Court begun and held in and for the County ud State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 8th day of jovenber, 1954, at 10:00 ofclock A. M., when and where His Honor, J. C. Rudisill, judge Presiding and Hotding Courts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District of forth Carolina, Fall Term, 1954, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. yorris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial istrict of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J.C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and opened Court by order of the Court. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredeli County returns into open Court the names of the ftiollowing good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this the Yovember Term, 1954, Iredeli County Superior Court, for the first week, to-wit: G. S. Hines William C. Pickett Mrs. A. C. Rumple C. E. Verble Hal Harrison 8. Ke Hoover Glenn Money i, W. Jones Kenneth A. Wilkinson irs. Flossie G. Frye fC. Perry John W. Howard Johnnie B. Moore i. C. Summers i. M. Loyd 5. T. Snow Quy Waugh J. L. Sharpe H. L. Little Robert Wilson R. A. Wilson H. E. Sherrill Henry E. Stevenson James E. Davis C. E. Pope J. T. Overcash Roger C. Niblock J. Rex Campbell Louis G. Bowles G. D. Pierce H. B. Sherrill Clarence R. Williams R. B. Parker Robert W. Wilson Bruce Alexander D. Neil Morrison 7 K. Hoover, J. L. Sharpe, Henry E. Stevenson, and D. Neil Morrison were excused by Court. Johnnie B. Moore was excused because he was in service. Robert Wilson was not served. i. B. Sherri} was out of the State. Kobert B, Benfield was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. Grand Jury- J B. Goforth was sworn as Officer in charge of the WNo. 1523 State vs Walt Coffer YNo. 1616 State vs J. D. Gray No. 1724 State vs L. D. Wall No. 1734 State vs Willard L. Dison (No. 1858 State vs Raymond Saunders Spann ‘No. 1878 State vs Gilmer Sherrill No. 1886 State vs James Campbell YNo . 1887 State vs Luther White ‘No. 1891 State vs Coyte Houston ‘No. 1899 State vs George Harris ‘No. 1900 State vs John T Click ‘No. 1915 State vs Robert Preston Weatherman ‘No. 1945 State vs Charles Henry Knox ‘No. 1973 State vs Sam King JNo. 2050 State vs Atwell Ulysses Icenhour No. 2051 State vs Atwell Ulysses Icenhour FIRST WEEK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1 Monday, November 8, 1954 sia ASSUALT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order, ASSUALT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT Alias Capias. DRUNK & DISORDERLY Alias Capias. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias. POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR FOR SALE Continued under forme order. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Alias; Capias. ASSUALT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Alias Capias. POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Alias Capias. POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Continued under former order. DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED Defendant called and failed. Fa and Capias Instanter. Judgment Nisi Se! BAST ARDY Continued under former order. MAINTAINING COMMON LAW NUISANCE Continued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Continued for Defendant. DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED Continued for Defendant. FIRST WEEK js, 2111 & 2112 State snest Curt McCracken ho, 2122 State vs jsiah Hill jos. 2123 & 2124 State vs xilly James Thorneburg fo. 212° State vs Hillard Robert Marlow Yo, 2142 State vs joss Parker Yo, 2143 State v8 kbert Turner Summers Yo, 2144 State v8 fred Mull, Jr lo. 2147 State vs ‘mes Edward Torrence jo, 2148 State v8 ‘ohn Woodrow Adams ios. 2149 & 2150 State an “dy Millard Murdock bh, 2151 tate v8 ‘chard (NMN) Moose hos. 2108 & 2109 State 1, vs “mes William Campbell ho. 2110 state : vs ‘jamin Odell Wellman Mo. 2155 State Vs ‘anes Ralph Lambert Sate’ 2160, & 2161 lanes V2 *¢ Thomas Hollar MO. 216 State , lent "L Parson Surles v21- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ccoce NOVEMBER TERM, 195), Monday, November 8, 195), HIT & RUN: DRIVING DRUNK The defendant complied with the judement of the former court and has abandoned his appeal, therefore the cases go off the docket. LARCENY Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa & Capias Instanter. ” NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: Alias Capias RECKLESS DRIVING LARCENY OF AUTO A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL A True Bill. LARCENY OF AUTO A True Bill. FORGERY A True Bill. ASSUALT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill. ASSUALT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY True Bills. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill. ASSAULT: ASSAULT ON FEMALE Continued. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. } PAID LIQUOR: POSSESSING LLONS NON-TAX oeeee OSS Ese) LIQUOR FOR SALE: MANUFACTURING NO PAID LIQUOR Continued. SPEEDING Continued. ll ee - 4 ray ] i} + vi fs 7 ne? | ‘a f ti hey y *; i } i B ‘ te" @ ; tn my Uee No. 1987 State vs David Bailey No. 2042 State vs Catherine Wooten ‘No. 2140 State vs J. D. Davenport ‘No. 214 State vs Fred Mull, Jr ‘No. 2172 State vs John L. Moore FIRST WEEK ---- NOVEMB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ER TERM? Monday, November 8, iste 1954 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Co Judgment of the Court is that the aeendere, a in the common jail of Iredell of one and Public Works Commission for the service i. iy, 2146 dant be con Mi yate Co year and be assigned to the State ure > are oe Bugene Webster term. This sentence is suspende of said condition the defendant be - geod tease an Upon pay into the office of the Clerk of this aera he of $12.50 each week for the Support of his wif the sur | two children born of the marriage, and that h a cost of this action. : @ pay the | ARSON The defendant having ertered a lea at the last criminal term of this court. peepee judgment having been left open until this term, the ¢ ) directing that the Probation Department make an investi gation, and investigation has been made and the report filed with the Court, and the Probation Officer reconne ing to the Court that probation would be to the defendan advantage, Jt is therefore the judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison at Raleigh for a term of not less than three nor more thar five years, to be assigned to the Women's Division of | said prison, and this sentence is Suspended for a period of five years and the defendant placed on probation for a period of three years upon the terms and conditions set out in the probation judgment. The defendant to u the cost of this action. 7 Nate ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL vs Defendant enters a plea of guilty of Assault With atk Presnell Deadly Weapon, which plea the State accepts. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined in the common jail of Iredell County for a tem of nine months and be assigned to the State Highway and Public Works Commission for the service of said term. This sentence is suspended for a period of three years upon condition that the defendant be of good behavior, that he violate none of the lws of the State; that he do not carry a pocket knife or other instrument which could be used as a deadly weapon at any time within said period of three years; that he follow some gainful employment; that he do not permit gambling in or about his premises; and that he pay the cost. aug Nate v8 FORGERY ister L. Houston Defendart enters a plea of guilty of an attempt commit Forgery, which plea the State accepts. he or Judgment of the Court is that the defendant oo fined in the common jail of Iredell County for s © of two years and be assigned to the State Hi "a Saas. Public Works Commission for the service of 88 Y 2143 Sate Ys of Public Drunkedt? "Turner Summers DRUNK . Defendant enhors a plea of guilty a which ,lea the State acce;ts. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant 0 in the common jail of Iredell County ay way and (30) DAYS and be assigned to the State H gaid ter Public Works Commission for the service of two years This sentence is suspended for a period behavior and upon condition the defendant be of g 4 that ne PY violate none of the laws of the state, & the cost of this action. IN THE SUPERIOR COURY FIRS'! WikKk ------- NOVEMBER Tiny ° 1954 Monday, November 8, 1954 MURDER The Grand Jury in a bod yY composed of members, including the foreman, aienea ince ies court the toliowing bili of indictment: r STAT OF NORTH CAROLINA ¢ SUPERIOR GOURY 7". COUNTY t November 8th Term, 1954 . e Jurors for the State upon their oath present: That a Eugene Webster late of the County of Iredell, on sy ~ day of August A. D. 1954, with force and arms at and in the said County, unlawfully, willfully ; feloniously, and of his malice aforethought, did kill ao a Sumrow contrary to the form of the nm such case made and provided peace and dignity of the State. ee Zeb_A. Morris olicitor. INDICTMENT: MURDER WITNESS: Lloyd Hudspeth; Lewis Caldwell; Edward Caldwell: Frank Brumley; X Clayton Dyson; X H. L. Beaver; H. L. Beaver; Dr. W. W. Painter; Boyd Miller; X R. E. Perkins; Marshall Maness; Marvin Raymer; Dr. W. M. Summerville; Herman McGee; Frank McCombs; Those marked X sworn by the undersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found A TRUE BILL R. E. Benfield oreman of the Grand Jury. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters plea of guilty of Driving Drunk, which plea the State accepts. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR (4) MONTHS and be assigned to the State Highway and PubJic Works Commission for the service of said term. This sentence is suspended for a period of three years upon condition the defendant be of good behavior, that he surrender his driving license to the Clerk of the Court to be forwarded to the Safety Division of the State Highway and Public Works Commission for revocation as the law provides, and that he pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost. LARCENY OF AUTO Defendant enters a plea of guilty of Larceny of Auto, State accepts. “Ta ges Court is that the defendant be aa in the common jail of Iredell County for a,term of . (6) MONTHS, and be assigned to the State Highway an Public Works Commission for the service of said term. LARCENY OF AUTO R. A. Collier, h h his Att ° kta an of gulity ALoPRaRSEg Auto, which the State accepts. ; “i. defendant waives a bill of indictment ONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR “he of Transporting & ax Paid Liquor, which plea Possessing Siaty Sa the State accepts: + is that the defendant be conrines Judmers on jail of ireded County, £05 s E"Aoise vork in the igned to the State It is ordered HS and be ass tern. Commission for vt wervice of ated and sold as provided by that the automobile be con law. SSING 60 GA a plea of gui llons of Non-T TRANSPORTING & POSSE Defendant enters u24 ‘No. 1431 State vs Clayton M. Parks ‘Nos. 1981, 1982, & 1983 State vs Charles W. Groom “Nos. 2165, & 2166 State vs . Thad Thomas Lambert \No. 2137 State vs Archie Triplette No. 2179 State vs Jlemens David Kalischer ‘Nos. 2153 & 2154 State vs Hal Chamberlain —_——— =< oe IN SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- NOVEMBER TERM, Monday, November 8, 195), am. 195% DRIVING DRUNK It appearing to the Court that the D into te office of the Clerk of this court ae" nas eid $400.00, and that he has fully complied with a of the judgment heretofore entered. It is theres ordered that the cash bond be reimbur — sed to the defendant, HIT & RUN; DRIVING DRUNK: NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE It appearing to the Court that the defendant has into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court — sum of $150.00 on a judgment imposed at the November , Term, 1953, it is therefore ordered by the Court that th said amount be anplied first to the payment of the court, costs and the remaning balance be pro rated to the clain of the persons set out in the original judgment, ’ POSSESSING ONE PINT NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of guilty of Possessin Non-Tax Paid Liquor and Driving Drunk. Consolidated for Judgment. Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of NINE (9) MONTHS and be assigned to the State Highway & Public Works Commission for the service of said term. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of guilty of House Breaking. SPEEDING Defendant enters a plea of guilty of Speeding Seventy (70) mph, through his Attorney, W. R. Battley. Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and costs. ASSAULT ON OFFICER: RECKLESS DRIVING : Defendant through his Attorney, McLaughlin & Battley, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. The Bar unanimously voted that court should close at 5 o'clock this afternom and remain closed until Wednesday morning out of respect to the deceased Govern of N. C., the Honorable William B. Umstead, and in this the Court concurs whole- heartedly. to be Court adjourned on Monday afternoon to open again on Wednesday morning or of recessed on Tuesday out of respect to the memory of our distinguished govern North Carolina, who died and will be buried on Tuesday at 11 o'clock A. M. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, Novem 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. & one ping Wo. 2138 state inl David Young to. 2177 State v8 Jin Locklear fo. 2180 State v8 Paul Rupert Shouse No. 2145 State vs Robert Smith State vs Robert Smith So. 2175 State vs ‘urfield V. Waugh State vs Oglee (None) Lane fos. 2173 & 2174 State ¥8 “lliam Ntcholson Mowbray | ‘Nos, } ol 984 & 1985 vs James Groce Harwell No. 1979 State vs James Carr No. 2152 State vs John W. Lewis FIRST WEEK --~----~ NOVEMBER TERY IN THE SUPERTOR COURT Wednesday, November 10, 1951,” wa LARCENY OF AUTO A True Bill, § ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill. } LARCENY OF AUTO A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill. { ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON { Continued for State. } FORNICATION AND ADULTRY | Nol Pros With Leave. } LARCENY OF AUTO t Nol Pros With Leave. } DRIVING DRUNK: Continued. DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED } FAIL TO SHOW DRIVER'S LICENSE: DRIVING DRUNK | Continued. } LARCENY OF AUTO | The Court directs Capias issue for the Defendant. NG DRUNK | a ak dnane for Compliance. ued JNo. 2143 State vs Robert Turner Summers JNo. 2151 State vs Richard (NMN) Moose WNos.2114 & 2115 State vs James Mason Faires ‘Nos. 2149 & 2150 State vs Buddy Millard Murdock FIRST WEEK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM Wednesday, November 10, 195), _ LARCENY OF AUTO The judgment of the Court sentencéd to the Iredell Shoate teat’ ofendant de to work under the supervision of the Stat i 88 taned and Public Works Commission of North ¢ reié ighway period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS. This gcarelim® for a pended and the Defendant is pla SNCe if ous. ced under for a period of TWO (2) YEARS Probation conditions set out in the probation aoe and jos. 2139 & 2167 State v8 jillard Robert Marlow ne ENTERING & LARCENY e Defendmt enters a plea of of goods valued at less then $100.60. Of Larceny Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant b confined in the common jail of Iredel} County to b assigned to work under the Supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission for a period of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS. This Sentence is suspended and the Defendat is placed under probation for a period of THREE (3) YEARS, upon the terms and condi- tions set out in the probation judgment. DRIVING DRUNK: SPEEDING IN EXCESS OF 75 MPH ue enters plea of Nolo Contendere in No. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and be assigned to the State Highway & Public Works Commission for the service of said term. This sentence is suspended for a period ‘o, 2138 of THREE (3) YEARS on condition the defendant be of @ state good behavior, that he violate none of the laws of Mh. the state; that he surrender his driving license to samuel David Young the Clerk of the Court to be sent to the Safety Division of the State Highway & Public Works Commission to be revoked according to law, and that he pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost. ‘ In No. 2115, on charge of Speeding, Nol Pros With eave. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty of Larceny of goods valued at less than $100.00. ‘ In No. 2150, on charge of Breaking, Entering, An Larceny, judgment of the Court is that the oan be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of B}GHTEEN (18) MONTHS, and be assigned Z the State Highway & Public Works Commission for t service of said term. This sentence to run : — with the contents eae an es n No. 2149, on charge of Breaking, : ios , Larceny, judgment of the Court is that the eee hone 2169, & 2170 be confined in the common jail of Iredell Tr. oe a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and be assigne he service State Highway & Public Works Commission for pom of said term. This sentence to begin at ye sentence tion of the sentence imposed in 2150 one i from this is suspended for a period of THREE (3) a penavior date on condition the defendant be of go t when heis violate none of the laws of the state; toeieely obtain realeased from prison that he shall imme t the streets gainful employment, shall not loiter ee or cit!) of the City of Statesville or any rr on oF pefore and that he shall be at home every even ne oe after 10 o'clock P. M. and not be away from aie or step that hour unless accompanied by his mot father. ‘ vs “mtuel David Young Defendat® the Upon information to the Solicitor eae any of during said period of suspension has vi sentence, pr the conditions imposed in the suspende ut to he shall immediately pray judgment to P sentence into effect. FIRST wack IN THE SUPERIOR COURT wee ennn ee NOVEMBER TERM, Wednesday, November 10, 1954 7“ LARCENY OF AUTO In No. 2167, on charge of Larceny of Auto, the defendant through his Attor a plea Nolo Contendere. ney N. R. Battley, enters Judgment of the Court is that fined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term the sentence he is now serving. In No. 2139, oncharge of Larceny of Auto, the defendant, through his Attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of guilty of temporary larceny of a car. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of FIFTEEN (15) MONTHS® and be assigned to the State Highway and Public works Commission for the service of said term. This sentence to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed in No. 2167, and this sentence is suspended for a yperiod of FIVE (5) YEARS upon condition the defendant be of good behavior, that he remain totally sober, that he follow some gainful occupation and use the proceeds therefrom for the Support of himself and his family. Upon information to the Solicitor that the defendant during said period of suspension has violated any of the conditions imposed in the suspended sentence, that he shall immediately pray judgment to put the ,rison sentence into effect. LARCENY OF AUTO Defendant enters a plea of guilty of Temporary Larceny of Auto, through his Attorney, Hugh G. Mitchell, which »lea the State accerts. : Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and be assigned to the State Highway & Public Works Commission for the service of said term. This sentence to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed in N,s. 2168, 2169 and 2170 esnsehsieet ~~. x this judgment is suspended for a period of FIVE 5) A upon condition the defendant be of good behavior, violate none of the laws of the state, that he remain sober, he follow regularly some gainful employment = ge proceeds therefron for the support of himself and his family. Upon information to the Solicitor that the defendant f lated any of the id period of suspension has vio tia imposed in the suspended sentence, that a shall immediately pray judgment to ;ut the prison sen into effect. NO Somgon's LLCRSE ST ctrany Hugh metal ou ° online ak of fake Contendere, which plea the State dated for judgment. accepts. These taree oer. eng defendant be confined e Court is i ee il of Iredell County for . * Satis (12) MONTHS and be assigned & one Peet oa 12 Works Commission for the ote icense to sar Bhaet the defendant surrender hi fety Division of he S of the Court to be forwarded to Te tescian. and not, Works the State Highway & cas the highways of North Carolina ontil his arte as hissnee bee been lawfully issued to him. oe . <a cated 9 . s ea i oe Ee - = - _ ee ‘ wt ee we i nm a on * aT ase eeet ——- =, 3 7 me vt or OO <= “2 ~ Sas ae ~ tment i isl tiie owe -* . we = on PIT nin liga ne theme ‘No. 2177 State vs Jim Locklear VNo. 2171 State vs Horace R. Echerd iNo. 2148 State vs John Woodrow Adams ‘No. 2176 State vs John Henry Sherrill ‘No. 2097 State vs Clyde Carmi Cook, Jr. \No. 2147 State vs James Edward Torrence IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------. NOVEMBER TERM Wednesday, November 10, 1951, 1954, ASSAULT wITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant enters a ple assault. — nr os Felonious The judgment of the Court is t confined in the Statets Prison at hard sate fondant we of ten years, this sentence to begin at the nt Ay of the sentence the defendant is now Serving; ne Court wishes to call the prison official's att a | the following facts: ention to | hat this prisoner has caused consi in the camps where he has been stasienene an bape to abide by the regulations imposed by the of said camp; that he is now serving a term (20) YEARS for manslaughter from the Sampson and that he has incited riots and all kinds of trouble in the camps where he has been stationed. This prisone record is such that the Court asks that he be held in ' Central Prison where there is sufficient authority and County Cour power to make him abide by the regulations imposed, and ! that he not be sent out on the highways of the State for the reason that on this occasion he had to be shot in order to avoid his escaping, and the Court respectful requests that he be confined in a safe place where he will be forced to abide by the regulations of the authorities in respect to the service of said tern. DRUNK Defendant, through. his Attorney, W. R. Battley, enter a plea of Nolo Contendere. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confin in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THIRTY (30) DAYS and be assigned to work at the County Home, for the service of said term. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, WITH INTENT TO KILL, INPLIC! SERIOUS INJURY NOT RESULTING IN DEATH. Lefendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined in the State Prison for a term of not less than TWO(2) nor more than FIVE (5) YEARS, and assigned to work as provided by law. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant, through his Attorney, Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empaneled. A verdict of not guilty entered by Court. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant, through his Attorney, a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empaneled. * A verdict of not guilty entered by Court. Grant Bolmer, enters ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON R. A. Collier represents private Defendant enters a plea of guilty rid Deadly Weapon with saeeee oe NEEEs in injury not resulting in death. "hens of the Court is that the Doteane fined in the State Prison for a CO EARS and a8 THREE (3) nor more than FIVE (5) YEARS, - work as provided by law. © It is ordered that the shot gun b> destr as Sheriff. secution- of Assault with cting serio that he Tefuse , ho. 2141 spate - ; joss Parker Nos» 2156, 2157, & 2158 State vs jmes Edward Johnson Yo. 2180 State vs Paul Rupert Shouse IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------~ NOVEMBER TERM, 195, Wednesday, November 10, 1954 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant enters a pl weay on. Flea of assault with deadly udgment of the Court is that the defend in the common jail of Iredell County for a ina (6) MONTHS, and be assigned to the State Highway & Public Works Commission for the Service of sid term. This sentence is suspended for a period of THREE (3) YEARS upon the following conditions: That the defendant be of good behavior, that he pay into the office of the Clerk of this Court the sum of $160.00 for the use and benefit of Joe V. Ross for medical expenses and loss of time, and that he pay the cost of this action. ASSAULT The defendant, through his Attorneys, Neil Sowers ari W. R. Battley, enters a plea of guilty as charged in all three cases. In No. 2156, the judgement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell] County for a term of THIRTY (30) DAYS, and be assigned to the State Highway & Public Works Commission for the service of said term. In No. 2157, the judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THIRTY (30) DAYS, and be assigned to the State Highway & Public Works Commission for the service of said term. This sentence to begin at the expiration of the sentence of THIRTY (30) DAYS in No. 2156. In No. 2158, judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THIRTY (30) DAYS, and be assigned to the State Highway & Public Works Commission for the service of said term. This —_s wo at the expiration sentence imposed in No. 57° ” The aforesaid aeee sentences of THIRTY [3 DATS cach are suspended for a ;eriod of FIVE (5) YEARS upon the ditions: “alls tas aeientees be of general good behavior; that to molest or lay his hands he do not molest or attem,t to + sania upon the person of any children, either male or . during said period of suspension, and by children — Court means persons under 21 years of — 7. pelle y defendant at no time go to shows of -. cr” rece County; that he follow some gainful employm . = he pay a fine of $25.00 and the costs in eac . OF AUTO lies enters a plea of guilty of Tempor which plea the State accepts. t the defendant be The judgment of the Court is wes County for a term tf ir confined in the common jail o : er eee S, and be assigned to ; peg Ay Tae Commission for the service of said term ary Larceny, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- NOVEMBER TERM 19 5h FIRST WEEK ------.. NOV Wednesday, November 10, 195," Thursday, loveier Tt ieee’ 1954 GRAND JURY REPORT ) MURDER VEMB By, 246 NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 | me ‘ she defendant, through his Attorneys, McLaughlin & rr i dee cass a pies of not guilty , whereupon a jury wther Eugen empaneled. The Grand Jury found true bills of indictment on all cases presented by the luthe i tis antes . i aie de aaieaetet dian a — en a directed verdict of not guilty. Motion allowed. Committees visited and inspected the following County Properties: io 2137 } BREAKING, ENTERING, & LARCENY County Jail phew ) JUDGMENT of the Court is that the Der 3 3 in the State Prison to be assigned . oe oe searenee A " v gned to work under th t the County Jail we found the following prisoners: Eight white Male, nine (jg uchie Triplette Seto partes ct ee Highway and Public ache Tsien i ra period o 12) MONTHS. Thi colored male, making a total of seventeen prisoners. suspended and 5 Defendant is placed ih peuuatien fl 4 period of TWO (2) YEARS, th We found the jail and all equipment in excellent condition. } out in the probation folgueet. a ee oe Also a sanitary rating of 98% was noted for during the year 1953 and 1954, fo, 2132 | CRIME AGAINST NATURE We also would like to say the people do not know how to ap. reciate their State ! pager pat through his Attorney, George Morrow, enters . 3 county’ jail without visiting it. Cie a plea of not guilty.of Crime Against Nature. County Home At the County Home we found the following inmates: White female, 16, White hs. 2159, 2160, & POSSESSING 110 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: FOR SALE 1 1 2161 } MANFACTURING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR. male, 15, Colored Male, 6, Colored Female, 7, making a total of 4l. Also we found State Defendant, through his Attorney, Eugene Trivette, vs enters a plea of guilty of all three charges. the following prisoners: White male 1, Colored male 3, Colored female 1. lace Thomas Hollar In No. 2161; judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County to be We found the entire premises of the County Home in fair condition. | —— to the ge anne wer tat — — or the service of a period o 7 Prison Camp ! is suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS upon conditio n that the defendant be of good behavior, that he violate At the Prison Camp we found it to be in excellent condition, with a total none of the laws of the state, oe meee” te an rohibition laws, an at he pay ° number of 118 prisoners. } and te cost. - - ' In No. 2160, on charge of Possessing 110 Gellona © (s) A three compartment sink is still needed, as they have not received one as see cote rs —— ea ce, FIVE (5 on condition the de : yet. Otherwise in good condition. i In No. 2159, on Charge of Possessing 110 Gallons Non- } Tax Paid Liquor, prayer for judgment continued for FIVE Court House } (5) YEARS upon condition the defendant pay the cost. We found that only part of the re;airs recommended in Grand Jury report of August \ . ho, 1 a gust, 1954 have been made. We recommend the following repairs: Painting in Renee | rates through His Attorneys, Mr. 4 S. eie? and ; f guilty of mandaughter. wat Seeing Soap, painting Office. These offices have never been painted a ethur Gilbert Jones | Mr sidgment of the Court on the Defendant be confined Te in the State Prison for a term of TWO (2) YEARS, and assigned to work as provided by law. We found the Welfare Building in good condition. They need a telephone extension. We note an improvement in the janitorial service in the Court House and recommend a continuation of this improvement. We find all other departments in good condition. R, E n oreman 12th This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, November ’ » &t 9:30 ofclock. A. M. 4 ZZ ) Yo = eile "> Judge Presiding $54, 1th This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, ae 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- --- NOVEMHER TERM, 195), Wednesday, November 10, 195), GRAND JURY REPORT NOVEMBER TERM, 1954, The Grand Jury found true bills of indictment on all cases presented by the Solicitor. Committees visited and inspected the following County Properties: County Jail At the County Jail we found the following prisoners: Eight white male, nine colored male, making a total of seventeen prisoners. We found the jail and all equipment in excellent condition. Also a sanitary rating of 98% was noted for during the year 1953 and 195), We also would like to say the people do not know how to ap. reciate their county jail without visiting it. County Home At the County Home we found the following inmates: White female, 16, White male, 15, Colored Male, 6, Colored Female, 7, making a total of 44. Also we found the following prisoners: White male 1, Colored male 3, Colored female 1. We found the entire premises of the County Home in fair condition. Prison Camp At the Prison Camp we found it to be in excellent condition, with a total number of 118 prisoners. A three compartment sink is still needed, as they have not received one as yet. Otherwise in good condition. Court House We found that only part of the reyairs recommended in Grand Jury report of August, 1954 have been made. Painting in We recommend the following repairs: Office. Tax Listing Office, Painting These offices have never been painted and are very dirty. We found the Welfare Building in good condition. They need a telephone extension. We note an improvement in the janitorial service in the Court House and recommend a continuation of this improvement. We find all other departments in good condition. ae el oreman This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, Novembe 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. J. 4f uc ge yy es . ae oe P Pd Jo, 2146 State vs fo 2137 State vs irchie Triplette fo. 2132 State vs j, J. Raby hs. 2159, 2160, & 2161 State vs lance Thomas Hollar . 1757 state vs thur Gilbert Jones This Honorable Court takes a IN SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -------- NOVEMBER TERM 1 Thursday, November ll, 1¢5, —- MURDER The defendant, through his Attorne ys, McLaughlin & Battley, enters a plea of not nilt " was sworn and empaneled. a en. or At the cldse of all the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict of not guilty. Motion allowed. BREAKING, ENTERING, & LARCENY JUDGMENT of the Court is that the Defendant be confined in the State Prison to be assigned to work under the Supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission for a period of TWELVE {12) MONTHS. This sentence is suspended and the Defendant is placed on probation for a period of TWO (2) YEARS, upon the terms and conditions set out in the probation judgement. CRIME AGAINST NATURE Defendant, through his Attorney, George Morrow, enters a plea of not guilty.of Crime Against Nature. POSSESSING 110 GALLONS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: FOR SALE MANFACTURING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR. Defendant, through his Attorney, Eugene Trivette, enters a plea of guilty of all three charges. In No. 2161; judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common a a aged > >. assigned to the State Hichwav ublic Works Comm for the service of a period of TWO {2) YEARS. This sentence is suspended for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS upon conditio n that the defendant be of good behavior, that he violate none of the laws of the State, and especially the a and prohibition laws, and that he pay a fine of $500. Ce * ane No. 2160, on charge of Possessing 110 Gallona of Non Tax Paid Liquor, prayer for judgment continued for FIVE (5) dition the defendant pay the cost. —— No. 2159, on Charge of Possessing 110 Gallons Non- Tax Paid Liquor, prayer for judgment continued for FIVE (5) YEARS upon condition the defendant pay the cost. ~ -—s through His Attorneys, Mr. Eraser ae Mr. John Lewis, enters a plea of guilty of mandaug ‘ ”* Sedan ; s that the Defendant be confine t of the Court i ] in eg eed Prison for a term of TWO (2) YEARS, and assigned to work as provided by law. recess until Friday Morning, November 12th, $54, at 9:30 otclock. A. M. WNo. 2132 State vs J. J. Raby YNo. 2125 State vs Donald Lee Butts No. 2133 State vs J. J. Raby VNo. 2164 State vs J. C. Scott Nos. 1988 & 1989 State vs Wanda Jean Henderson IN SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---------- =- NOVEMBER TERN Friday, November 12, 195, » 1951, CRIME et NATURE The defendant enters a plea of not the following jury, guilty, H. L. Little R. A. Wilson C. E. Pope J. T. Overcash William C. Pickett Hal Harrison J. Rex Campbell G. D. Pierce Robert W. Wilson Bruce Alexander W. W. Jones John W. Howard returned a verdict of not guilty. SPEEDING Continued. ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT RAPE Continued. ASSAULT ON FEMALE Continued. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT: NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE Continued. 15th This Honorable Court takes a recess until Mgnday Morning, November ©/"" 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. Whereupon IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 Monday, November 15, 1954 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1954, ath CAROLINA EDEL COUNTY This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, ender 15th, 1954 at 10200 o'clock A. M., with Honorable J. C. Rudisill, Judge wesiding and holding Courts of this Fifteenth Judicial District, Fall Term, 1954, wesent and presiding. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the unes of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this te second week of the November Term, 1954, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: J. K. Brown Mrs. Essie Lumsden Charles D. White fred Ms Beaver thomas N. Crawford Wade S. Lamberth j, He Holcomb E. M. Sentman W. H. Brown 3,7. Hatcher Thomas G. Wallace Norman Hoover lornard R. Cashion Luther R. Warren Mrs. O. R. Vickers irthur Lee Stikeleather V. T. Moran Herman L. Moore i, D. Murdock A. Fuller SAms, Jr Ottie Setzer i, W. Robinette Ralph V. Feimster Karl Lackey Earl Bass D. P. Stimpson iy Cartner, Jr. fit E. Smith 1B. Pharr Myrtle J. Morrison F. C. Nesbit Mrs. Pauline Middlesworth B. L. Morrison, Jr. W. F. Hinton ‘ary A. Sloop Wheeler James lt E. Smith, Mrs. Essie Lumsden, Charles D. White, E. M. Sentman, A. Fuller Sams, Jdr., teeler James, and Karl Lackey excused by Court. ‘houas N. Crawford, excused until January Term. 1H. Holcomb, D. P, Stimpson, Deceased. 4 1, Hatcher, not returned. “onard R, Cashion, see letter. \ K. Brown, voluntary fireman. lade S. Lamberth, in Virginia. fs. 0. R, Vickers, Doctor's Certificate. Ll. Morrison, Jr., Mecklenburt County. \P. Hinton, Greenville, S. C. be The fo what shall hereafter llowing men constitute R. D. Murdock, E. W. Robinette, termed the Divorce Jury to-wit: Fred M. Beaver, Arthur Lee Stikeleather, Sloop, Thomas B. Wallace, Luther R. Warren, , 4y Cartner, Jr., R. B. Pharr, Harry A. 1, ". Moran, Ralph V. Feimster, and Earl Bass. * Se itt a Se die No. 2132 State vs J. J. Raby VNo. 2125 State vs Donald Lee Butts No. 2133 State vs J. J. Raby VNo. 2164 State vs J. C. Scott ‘Nos. 1988 & 1989 State vs Wanda Jean Henderson IN SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --~-----~~--- NOVEMBER TERM Friday, November 12, 1954 » 1954, CRIME AGAINST NATURE The defendant enters a the following jury, H. L. Little R. A. Wilson C. E. Pope J. T. Overcash William C. Pickett Hal Harrison J. Rex Campbell G. D. Pierce Robert W. Wilson Bruce Alexander W. W. Jones John W. Howard plea of not guilty, Whereupon returned a verdict of not guilty. SPEEDING Continued. ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT RAPE Continued. ASSAULT ON FEMALE Continued. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT: Continued. NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE th This Honorable Court takes a recess until Mgnday Morning, November 17% 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. sgt CAROLINA This Honorable Court convenes according to jovenber 15th, 1954 at 10:00 o'clock A. M IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM Monday, November 15, 195,” a7h IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 adjournment on Monday Morning, +, With Honorable J. C. Rudisill, Judge wesiding and holding Courts of this Fifteenth Judicial District, Fall Term, 1954, resent and presiding. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell Count y returns into open Court the unes of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the second week of the November Term, 1954, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: red Me Beaver homas N. Crawford i, H. Holcomb i, 1, Hatcher kornard R. Cashion irthur Lee Stikeleather i, D. Murdock iW. Robinette ‘oy Cartner, Jr. fat B. Smith 4B. Pharr ary A. Sloop Mrs. Essie Lumsden Charles D. White E. M. Sentman Thomas G. Wallace Luther R. Warren V. T. Moran A. Fuller SAms, Jr Ralph V. Feimster Earl Bass Myrtle J. Morrison Mrs. Pauline Middlesworth Wheeler James J. K. Brown Wade S. Lamberth W. H. Brown Norman Hoover Mrs. O. R. Vickers Herman L. Moore Ottie Setzer Karl Lackey D. P. Stimpson F. C. Nesbit B. L. Morrison, Jr. W. F. Hinton at E. Smith, Mrs. Essie Lumsden, Charles D. White, E. M. Sentman, A. Fuller Sams, Jr., heeler James, and Karl Lackey excused by Court. ‘houas N. Crawford, excused until January Term. He Holeomb, D. P. Stimpson, Deceased. «1, Hatcher, not returned. “onard R, Cashion, see letter. Kk. Brown, voluntary fireman. lide S. Lamberth, in Virginia. fs. 0. R, Vickers, Doctor's Certificate. * L. Morrison, Jr., Mecklenburt County. P. Hinton, Greenville, S. C. The following men constitute what shall hereafter be d " tonwit: Fred M. Beaver, Arthur Lee Stikeleather, R. D. "7 Cartner, Jr., R. B. Pharr, Harry A. Sloop, Thomas B. Wallace, 1, ". Moran, Ralph V. Feimster, and Earl Bass. termed the Divorce Jury Murdock, E. W. Robinette, Luther R. Warren, IN SUPERIOR COURT IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- NOVEMBER TERM? 195), SECOND WEEK NO ERM © ; | VEMBER TERM? Monday, November 15, 1951 4 Monday, Novemver 15, 1954 — INo. 5183 ) DIVORCE 4 ' The Divorce Jury #1" being duly swo F jrinony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they Donald F. Lambert { answers the issues Submitted to it as fee Cmipane vs. Ollows; Willie Mae Torrence Lambert No. 5183 J. C. Rudisill NORTH CAROLINA Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR co IREDELL COUNTY URT | RRR RK RK RR RR RR & pe hereby dissolved. this 15th day of November, 1954. } DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled ! ' ) ®. 510 ) Bi Nl. Robinson ) ) Donald F. Lambert Plaintiff answers the issues submitted to it as follows: VS. vs. y Viola Robinson Willie Mae Torrence Lambert Defendant Bits caROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the “ELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 complaint? "iM. Robinson ) vs. ) ISSUES Answer: Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina y Viola Robinson ) for at least six months next preceding the bringing of this action? a. 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for Answer: Yes : ? ethan six months immediately preceding the institution of this action? 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived Separate and apart from each other Answer : Yes for at least two years next preceding the brin ing of this action? aie ? _— 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alkged in the complaint? Answer: Yes Answer: Yes }. Have the plaintiff and defendant been living seperate and apart for more NORTH CAROLIN Son? —— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT two years immediately preceeding the institution of this action: IREDELL COUNTY Answer: Yes Donald F. Lambert Plaintiff ) t E COURT vs. Be caRorrna IN THE SUPERIOR ) BB: BER TERM, 1954 Willie Mae Torrence Lambert "21 county NOVEM Defendant ) FM. Robinson ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J.C. . JUDGMENT of the Superior Rudisill, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November, 1954, term MP Vile Robinson , sourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that defendant has been Iredell County F cause coming on to be heard at the November Term 1954 of the ted to a oersonally served with process, and the following issues having been submit tor Court eiese tes ee, 0 4 Rudisill, and a jury, and being heard an and answered by the jury: * jury having answered the issues as set out in the record. in the here- 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged Mis therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony b complaint? and the same are hereby Oh gas . < “ore *xisting between the plaintiff and defendant be, ce from Answer: Yes absolute divor ae Molved and the plaintiff be and he is hereby granted an 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the Stated North ¥ te defendant, n be paid by the plaintiff. uage Presiding teenie eee F a ie. - ie for at least six months next preceding the bringing of this action? ‘is further ordered that the costs of this actio Answer: Yes, ch othe? “Sth day of November, 1954. ea 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from for at least two years next preceding the bringing of this action? x % Answer: Yes Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the pl he is herebv granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, —< eee ne ee - . * . fm. pe - mre. IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------~ NOVEMBER TERM Monday, November 15, 1954 + 1954 YNo. 5843 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being dy} Peggy Lee White Glass, by empanelled answers the teense submitted ee and through her next friend, follows: o it as Baxter H. Finch Plaintiff vs. George Rudolyh Glass, Defendant NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 195, Peggy Lee White Glass, by and through' her next friend, Baxter H. Finch Plaintiff vs. George Rudolph Glass, Defendant 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live se,arate and apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 Peggy Lee White Glass, by ) and through her next friend, Baxter H. Finch ) ) Plaintiff vs. George Rudolph Glass, ) Defendant ) Superior This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the »vF Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor J. C. Rudisill, Judge o it by Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted ¢ in the the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out records. * Of Irede) Superior Court and a jury, and the Utted to them in favor of the plaintiff and again IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1951, Monday, November 15, 1954 it is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimory iofore existing between the plaintiff, Peggy Lee white Glass, and the defendant, . gudolph Glass, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an sute divorce from the defendant. J. C. Rudisill Judge Presiding KKK KK Rk RR OK kk & , $650 The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled Plaintiff answers the issues submitted to it as follows: VS. , laura T. Harris Defendant i CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 ey Harris, ) Plaintiff VS. ) ) ‘laura T. Harris, ) ) Defendant l. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer; Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and ayart from each other wo years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes tely 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County for six months immediately Wing the commencement of this action. Answer: Yes Y CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 'Y Harris, Plaintirr ) v8, JUDGMENT ‘laura 7, Harris, Defendant ) es M8 cause coming on to be heard bevore the undersigned Judge ho jury having answered the issues st the defendant, 45 a;pears in nr ®cords IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- *---- NOVEMBER TERM, Monday, November 15, 195, 1954 IT IS, THEREFORE, Ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds Of marr; ’ Plage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved anu set aside, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, J.C. Rudisil udge rresiding eR RR KR RK ek ok \No. 5853 Clara Sykes Tharpe Plaintiff DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empane)le; answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Otte D. Tharre, Defendant | vs. { ! | { NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 195), Clara Sykes Tharye, ; Plaintiff vs. Otto D. Tharpe, Defendant. ) ) ) ) 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint’? Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next -yreceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TEKM, 1954. Clara Sykes Thar;e, Plaintiff, ) vs. JUDGMENT ) Otto D. Tharpe, Defendant. ) J ing the res This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding i 4 the jut term of November, 1954, Superior Court of Iredell County, and a jury, 4m si and ag@ having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff the defendant, as aypears in the record; BLwsLL COUNTY IN SUPERIOR COURT SKCOND WEEK --.---...- NOVEMBER Ti Monday, November 15, 1954, = It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of ytrinony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and he game are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an jpgolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. J. C. Rudisill "Judge Presiding Ke KKK RK KK RR DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: fo, 5855 wth Bloise Campbell Richardson Plaintiff vs ijlliam Lee Richardson, Defendant \RTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 uth Eloise Campbell Richardson ) Plaintiff ) vs ) eLSSUES ‘liam Lee Richardson, ) Defendant. ) 1. Did the Plaintiff, Ruth Eloise Campbell Richardson, and the Defendant, ‘lliam Lee Richardson, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the Plaintiff, Ruth Eloise Campbell Richardson, and the Defendant, tive ‘liam Lee Richardson, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecu ‘ars immediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes fide 3. Has the Plaintiff, Ruth Eloise Campbell Richardson, been a bona ing the “‘wident of the State of N&rth Carolina for six months immediately preceding “immencement, of this action? Answer: Yes RT ‘RTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COU TELL counry NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 ‘Uth Bloige Campbell Richardson, Plaintiff, vs. ) J ‘lien Lee Richardson ) Defendant. ) d by His Honor J. C. Rudisill, Judge Thig ar *ause coming on to be heard, and being he prior Court for Iredell County, “siding, and a jury, at the November Term, 1954, ms 4 to, and answered by forth Carolina, and the following issues having been submitte . ‘h * Jury, to--wit: IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- NOVEMBER TERM, 195, Monday, November 15, 1954 1. Did the Plaintiff, Ruth Eloise Campbell Richardson, and the Defeng ant, William Lee Richardson, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the Plaintiff, Ruth Eloise Campbell Richardson, and the Defendant, William Lee Richardson, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutj 4 ve years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the Plaintiff, Ruth Eloise Campbell Richardson, been a bona fide resident of the State of NOrth Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes The Court further finds that summons was duly served on the Defendant by W. ¢, Jenkins, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, on the 24th day of September, 1954, by delivering personally to the Defendant a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the bonds of matrimony heretfore existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant be, and they are dissolved, and the Plaintiff, Ruth Eloise Campbell Richardson, is granted an absolute divorce from the Defendant, William Lee Richardson. Let the cost of this action be paid by the Plaintiff. This the 15th day of November, 1954. J. C. Rudisill udge Presiding eek Ke KK Kk Ke *No. 5857 Mabel G. Benfield Plaintiff DIVORCE a The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empan answers the issues submitted to it as follows: vs. George Aaron Benfield, Defendant NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Mabel G. Benfield, Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 vs. ISSUES George Aaron Benfield Defendant ) ) ) ) husband 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry, and are they now and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes apart and 2. Did the plaintiff and the defendant separate and live separate « re ther m0 from each other, and have theylived separate and apart from each other & two years continuously prior to the institutgon of this action? Answer: Yes. 1 UDELL COUNTY Borge Aaron Benfield, Bid G. Chamblee, gesie J. Privette, B** other, and have they lived separate and apar oon ua SUPERIOR COURT SEC NOVEMBER TERM Monday, November 15, 195,” 7 3, Has the plaintiff been a honafide resident of the State of Nerth Carolina np nore than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COUR NOVEMBER TERM, 195, att CAROLINA G. Benfield, bel Plaintiff v8. JUDGMENT ) ) ) Defendant ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior urt of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor J. C. Rudisill, Judge Bisiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the wrt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the records. It is therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony wetofore existing between the plaintiff, Mabel G. Benfield, and the defendant, airge Aaron Banfield, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted wabsolute divorce from the defendant. J. C. Rudisill Judge Presiding eeeke eK eK Kk KK KK it. 5860 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it atline Mayberry Privette, as follows: 7 and through her next friend, Plaintiff vs. Defendant | 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and “ft, as alleged in the Complaint. Answer: Yes t art from ¢. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and ap t from each other for more than two 9 “8 continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: 3. Has Yes of North Carolina te the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the Sta ’ 9 “More than six montts prior to the commencement of this action Answer: Yes IN SYPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- NOVEMBER TE Monday, November 15, 195) mm, 1958 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR coupr NOVEMBER TERM, 195, Earline Mayberry Privette, by and through her next friend, Fred C. Chamblee, Plaintiff ) ) vs. JUDGMENT Lonnie J. Privette, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor J. C. Rudisill, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues Submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set Out in the records. It is therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrinony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Earline Mayberry, Privette, and the defendant, Lonnie J. Privette, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J.C. Rudisill Judge Presiding KR K KR ek ek ok ok ke oe & ‘No. 5863 Ollie B. Potts, Plaintiff DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelle answers the issues submitted to it as follows: vs. Joe M. Potts, Defendant NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Ollie B. Potts, Plaitiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT vs. ISSUES Joe M. Potts, Defendant. ) Complaint 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Answer: Yes rate a 2. the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived s¢? Did and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 3. than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Cgrol Answer: Yes Bh cana Superior | Bessey Larry Raby 5: insti ina for sore | ‘part continuously for two years next preceding the IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ew eneoee NOVEMBER TER Monday, November 15, 195, RM, 1954 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT gall, COUNTY ie B. Potts, , Plaintiff, VS. JUDGMENT iM, Potts nf Defendant, ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the November Term, 1054 werior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, J. C. fudisill, Judge Presiding Bia Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor Bs the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, as fully appears in the records It is, Threrfore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony wetofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, weby dissolved, and the Plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the fendant . This the 15th day of November, 1954. J, C. Rudisill Judge Presiding x ok cok » 5865 DIVORCE The answers Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled the issues submitted to it as follows: vs. 4TH CAROLINA S0ELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT bey Larry Raby vs. ) ISSUES ety Le Raby ) 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of NOrth Carolina for % : ? “than six months next preceding the institution of this action Answer; = Yes pplaint? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the compia Answer: Yes d separate 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they live tution of this action? Inswer: Yes IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----~.--- NOVEMBER TERM _IN SUPERIOR COURT Monday, November 15, 105, » 1954 ; SECOND WEEK --~-... NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 Monday, November 15, 1954 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR ¢ if IREDELL COUNTY _ i ,, 2125 jrate Bhi); lee Butts SPEEDING The defendant, throuch his Attorney, | ‘ r ; ley, W. R. Battl a plea of guilty to Speeding not in exeess of 70 ‘in’ et Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant pay fine of $50.00 od Dempsey Larry Raby vs. ) JUDGMENT 4 and costs. Betty L. Raby ) This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable J. C. R , 5669 ay Judge BS Ostwalt Presiding over the November Civil Term 1954 Iredell County, Superior Court and beid ais. , as Ostwa heard before said Honorable J. C. Rudisel, and a Jury, the following issues were M2 The selection of the Jury began and continued through the remainder of the day. submitted to the Jury: 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State cf North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant, separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institutiond this action? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be forever dissolved, and the ;laintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant Betty L. Raby, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk. And it is also made to appear to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that there is one minor child of said marriage, Gloria Ann Raby, who has been living with her mother, the defendant, since the separation of the ,arents; and it further appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that the defendant is a fit and suitable perosn to have custody of and control of said minor child, and that the best interest of said child would be served by being in the custody of her said mother; It is therefore ordered that the defendant be, and she is hereby, granted 7 and complete custody and control of said minor child until further order of this Court; And it is further ordered that the plaintiff shall until further order of this Court pay to the plairtiff for suprort and maintenance of said minor chilé the sum of Ten Dollars per week beginning with Ménday, November, 1954, and each week thereafter. é This 15th day of November, 1954. November 16, 1954, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, J. C. Rudisill Os . Judge Presiding 20 o'clock A. M, / - ‘fe / 5 5 ee eekk eae RRR RK ee Gif Cea & - —v~Juage Presiding C —————— IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 105, Tuesday, November 16, 195, JNos. 2153 & 2154 ! State vs Hal Chamberlain ASSAULT ON OFFICER: RECKLESS DRIVING . These two cases consolidated for judgment The judgement of the Court is, ; f ; f in the common jail of Iredell County -fo Confing (12) MONTHS and be assigned to the State Higher Bp tale | Works Commission for the service of Said term, nn This sentence is Suspended for a Period of five the following conditions: The Court finding as a fact that commitment has issued for his being sent to the State Hospital at Mo for such treatment as may be necessary, and that the o has filed a waiver in connection therewith, and further oe the defendant shall take such treatment as may he aha et as necessary by the officials of said hospital and shal] - at said hospital until legally discharged by the officials thereof, and that upon his release he shall he of genera]. | behavior and violate none of the laws of the state, and shal! pay the costs of this action. ' a years Uton i already JNo. 1808 State vs Louis W. MacKesson, Jr. NORTH CAROLINA DRIVING DRUNK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1954 State ) vs ) Louis W. MacKesson, Jr.) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. C. Rudis! Judge Presiding at the November Term, 1°54, Superior Court for Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that Judgement was entered in the above entitled cause by His Honor J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding, at the November Term, 1953, as appears in Minute Docket 31, at page #104 as follows: "No. 1808 State ) In the Superior Court Iredell County, November Term, 1953 vs ) Louis W. MacKesson, Jr.) Judgment of the court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail o Iredell County for a period of six }é] months, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentenct is suspended upon the following conditions: l. 2. That the defendant pay a fine of $125.00 and cost of this action. riod That he not operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways for 4 Pé erated of eighteen (18) months, the evidence showing that the defendant oP his car at a speed of 80 miles per hour for a distance of more tha the sirene sounding and officer's cars lights flashing. the motor 3. That he be of good behavior, particularly that he not violate vehicle laws for a period of three years." Laughlin That a motion has heen made by the defendant through his Counsel, Me and modif set, and Battley, that condition number 2 of gdid Judgement be stricken out \e {gs not ynreasons’ and the court in its discretion finding as a fact that said motion that the defendant b a N SUPERIOR cCouRT I SECOND WEEK --... ~-- NOVEMBER TERM Tuesday, November 16, 1954 siaiia I, is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed: ’ that condition number 2 of said Judgement be stricken Out and another section 2be inserted in lieu thereof to read as follows: that he not operate a motor vehicle in the State of North Carolina on or before ith day of Noverber, 1954." ixcept as herein modified, the remaining provisions upon which the prison sentence yspended are to remain in full force and effect. this 16th day of November, 1951. J.C. Rudisill Judge Presiding wok ew ek kk ek ke Ok kk $669 ra Ostwalt VS. istwalt ‘following jury was sworn and empanelled: Fred M. Beaver Arthur Lee Stikeleather foy Cartner, Jr. R. B. Pharr Thomas G. Wallace luther R. Warren Ralph V. Feimster Norman Hoover Herman L. Moore Ottie Setzer E. A. Walker Mrs. J. W. Van Hov 95 Pending trial the Court recessed until Wednesday Morning, Noverber, 17, 1954 Mr. John L. Milholiand, former Clerk of this Court, having died on Sunday, ter 14, and will be buried on Tuesday, November 1¢, the deceased being a ;ersonal dof the presiding Judge, it is the opinion of the Court and the unanimovs ¢cpinion he Bar that respect should be shown him, it is, therefore, by unanimous vote of the /COncurred in by the Court, that this court take recess at 12:30 this day and remain ory of the “d until 9:30 tomorrow morning as a memorial and respect to the memory ublic servant, "said deceased, who was a man of sterling reputation, an outstanding p pe hat this nota ‘man admitted by all persons who knew him, and the Court directs t : , this day. ‘teed in the minutes for the closing of the court at 12:30, noon ember 17, 1954 at This Honorable Court takes recess until Wednesday Morning, Nov *Oelock ALM. ie lie ee KO teAtec* ; Inde Presiding J r IN SUPERIOR COURT . oe ial ae SECOND WEEK ~------- NOVEMBER TERM, 195, seconp weit THE_SUPERIOR court ednesday, November 17, 1955 ee ee ee coe ise + 1954 Friday, ‘November 19, 196), No. 5669 is 527 Thelma Ostwalt North Carolina | In the Superior Iredell County | Ne vert er 7 ern - VS. ; De Herbert H. Pickens, ; aft ;f Sam Ostwalt Plaintiff, Marv L. Pickens Defendant. | { Trial of this case continued through the day. vs pueaouvuES ' a Were the plaintiff and defendant qY ed, as Complaint * . Answer. Yes 2. lave the plaintiff and defendant j 4 each cther for two vears next preco line the ccrmencement cf answer . EOS. . las tr plaintiff ’ } f le} tate ¢ C k are v i iis eectun’ This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday, November 18, 195i inswer. Yes. at 9:30 o'clock A. M, - ? Se a eer = EL) putt Me reser) comnty | Judge Presiding. arh ore : | ickoens ) ee eee ee ee ne whee oe & ot laintif?, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1954 No. 56469 me he en Thelma Ostwalt Tht, eo ns ee ee Ss ta 5 ¢ CC r _ holding +he reevlar term of lover! r; 1O5L, ) perio: Sam Ostwalt and A Sicuias and + ™ Re cata havir , answe! ed he fen ‘ 2a Trial of this case continued through the day. of the plaintiff and arainst the deferdant, aS 4p} + b Cc ( j t ’ or le ! ard A rer the matrimony heretofore existine hoetw +) pia i + aside and the plaint th, Samo are hoarahy disaclved and se anso] tea divorce fron the de fendar . Ts is furt he y ordered that . f ft ep Sit erences A a ice Tres 1958 This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, November 19, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. Oo 0 IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------~--NOVEMBER TERM, 10 au SUPERIGR Cota? 54 a pridey;Hoveatie 19° tee Son Friday, Noveaber 1g tary TEM: 1954 _ ® ' . JNo. 5669 Thelma Ostwalt | to, $669 VS. Ostwalt ) nee ENTRIES OF APPEAL, Sam Ostwalt V8- NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT jn Ostwalt . ) IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1954, Upon the coming in of the verdict the plaintiff in apt time moves to set THELMA OSTWALT (HARTER) ET AL wide the same as being against the weight of the evidence and for errors committed aintiffs ? ty the Court during the progress of the trial assiened and to he assiened. vs. ISSUES yotion denied. Exception. Judgment siened as appears in the record. To the SAM H. OSTWALT, ET AL : Defendants signing of the judgment the plaintiff asain excepts and cives notice of appeal 1. Was Mrs. T. A. Ostwalt mentally incompetent on May 21, 1952, Ais ieee tothe Supreme Court of North Carolina in open court. Further notice waived. the paper writing purporting to be a deed from her to the defendant, Sam H. Ostwal: By consent, the plaintiff is allowed 60 days within which te prepare and as alleged in the complaint? serve statement of case om appeal, and the defendant allowed 30 days after such ANSWER: “a service as time within which to file countercase or exceptions. Appeal bond in the sum of $200.00 adjudged sufficient. 2. Was the execution of said paper writing procured by undue influence? J. C. Rudisill eet Me. Judge Presiding. Hook x cok ok ok ke ok ok ok ok NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT fio, 5846 Robert W. Honeycutt vs. Beverly Ann Fay Richards ----------- Continued. IREDELL COUNTY. NOVEMBER TERM, 105, 4o. 5851 Mary Alexander Parker vs. Ernest Lee Parker ---------------- Continued. Thdma Ostwalt (Harter), et al, j do. 5864 Frank Brunner ve. Minnie McCray Brunner -------------------- Cont inued. Plaintiffs, | | 40. 5867 Stroy Dauehton Speaks vs. Wilma Millsaps Speaks ------------ Continued. Vs. ! JUDGMENT 40. 5740 Dolleither Smyre Scott vs. Wade Franklin Scott -------------- Continued. Sam H. Ostwalt, et al, | fio, 5805 Fred E. Woods vs. Helen D. Woods -------------2-----"-"""""" Cont inued. Defendants. | lo. 5798 Willie Click vs. Hugh R. Bryant --------------er-err nnn nn" Cont inued. Continued. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor, J. ¢ Wo. 5437 J. W. Moore vs. Howard Deal --------------9ee--onererrnnnnn" Rudisill, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, at the November, 1954 Term of the Superior “. 5581 Earl Hill vs. M. C. Goforth, Melvin Goforth ------ Continued by Consent. Court of Iredell County; and the Jury having. answered the issues submitted to Ho. 5609 A. P, Steadman & C. A. Sykes vs. D. W. Scott, Continued. L. B. Lyerly & L. V. Coggins -cocceoooooneoornornrnnn” Burch --- Continued. them as follows: ; 1. Meek Mo. 5648 Bennie Ray Freeze vs. Walter Eli Sherrill Jr. & George H. - Was Mrs. T. A. Ostwalt mentally incompetent on May 21, 1952, to execute P ---Continued. the paper writing purporting to be a deed from her to the defendant, “0. 5649 Benizer Lytle vs. Samuel Jay Karnick ------------" oocee Continu Sam H. Ostwalt, as alleged in the complaint? ) GY decees >. i Rov Fleet Peacock -----s<----"""=""""" Continued. ge B. Morgan vs. Koy ANSWER: No. R. Bailey -- Continued by : ° " 5665 Statesville Motor Coach Co. Vs. L. B. Bailey & Beatrice ” Consent. ud 2. Was the execution of said paper writing procured by undue influence: ere si iis gs ck ig pee shy oak seen 8 rk ek ace Oe sea ne Continued. ANSWER: No, "os 5696 H. EB. Meadows vs. Landerth I. Pruittt -----"- wne---- Continued. ae he Lynn Nesbit vs. Vincent Munch ---~ A. Mize vs- Holland Furnace Co. Inc. oooene Continued. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiffs -- Continued. Ao, take nothing by this action, and the defendants go without day and recover of * 5713 George A. Mize & Mrs. George wife 40. 5603 Vance Hager vs J. S. Miller &/Rose Lee Miller the plaintiffs the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. er % 5824, Mrs. Laura T. Harris vs. Harvey Harris This Novemher 1] 195k, 9, 5h eounee+=-Continued. tout oon Seeeeaeasesoeonr® ’ a“ | J. C. -hudigidd ——— 4845 Mrs. J, C. Eage vs. Lawrence #. Dearmon & Mrs a Judge Pres ng fio, 5857 . ecevrcomenccnoocsooooorr* ° W. E. Sherrill, Sr. vs Blake Morriso -o9<< ont inued. heathen ! Mrs. W. A. Windsor (certiorari) A | Ai " 55b4 OT. OH, Davis, Jr. vs. R. W. Davis, oF. IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- ~~--~--NOVEMBER TERM, 195, Friday, November 19, 1954 JNo. 5669 Thelma Ostwalt vs. Sam Ostwalt NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR courT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 195, THELMA OSTWALT (HARTER), ET AL Plaintiffs VS. SAM H. OSTWALT, ET AL Defendants 1. Was Mrs. T. A. Ostwalt mentally incompetent on May 21, 1952, to execute the paper writing purporting to be a deed from her to the defendant, Sam H. Ostwalt ay as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: No. 2. Was the execution of said paper writing procured by undue influence? ANSWER: No. NORTH CAROLINA, N THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. NOVEMBER TERM, 1°54 Thdma Ostwalt (Harter), et al, Plaintiffs, Sam H. Ostwalt, et al, ! ! Vs. ' JUDGMENT | ! Defendants. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor, J. ¢. Rudisill, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, at the November, 1954 Term of the Superior Court cf Iredell County: and the Jury having. answered the issues submitted to them as follows: 1. Was Mrs. T. A. Ostwalt mentally incompetent on May 21, 1952, to execute the paper writing purporting to be a deed from her to the defendant, Sam H. Ostwalt, as allezed in the complaint? ANSWER: No. was the execution of said paper writing procured by undue influence? ANSWER: No. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiffs take nothing by this action, and the defendants go without day and recover of the plaintiffs the cost of this action to he taxed by the Clerk. This Novemher 19, 1°54, J. C. Rudisill ~ Judge Presiding IN SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM Friday, Noverber 19, 1951 oo Noo 5669 ‘ walt thelma Ost ENTRIES OF APPEAL. VS. jan Ostwalt- Upon the coming in of the verdict the plaintiff in apt time moves to set ide the same as being against the weicht cf the evidence and for errors committed ty the Court during the progress of the trial assiened and to he assioned. Yotion denied. Exception. Judgment sisred as appears in the recerd. To the signing of the judgement the plaintiff acrain excepts and tives notice of appeal tothe Supreme Court of North Carolina in open court. Further notice waived. By consent, the plaintiff is allowed 460 days within which te prepare and serve statement of case on appeal, ard the defendant allowed 30 days after such service as time within which to file courtercase or exceptions. Appeal bond in the sum of $200.00 adjudeed sufficient. J. C. Rudisill Judge Presidine. wok e wk wk oe Rk kk ke oe Robert W. Honeycutt vs. Beverly Ann Fay Richards Cont inued. . , . ; inued. Mary Alexander fFarker vs. Ernest Lee Parker vontin bi _—. C inued. Frank Brunner ve. Minnie McCray Brunner Contin ac re ‘ alia Stroy Daughton Speaks vs. Wilma Millsaps Speaks Continue - » a Cont jnued. Dolleither Smvre Scott vs. Wade Franklin scott Cont inued. Fred E. Woods vs. Helen D. woods © Continued. Continued. Continued. ‘ ' “ch --- Continued. Bennie Ray Freeze vs. Walter £li Sherrill Jr. & George H. Bure Continued. Benizer Lytle vs. Samuel Jay Karnick Continued. George B. Morgan vs. Koy Fleet Peacock Vs. L. B. Bailey & Beatrice X. Bailey -- Continued by s. L. B. Statesville Motor Coach Co. Consent. Continued. Continued. L. Lynn Nesbit vs. Vincent Munch Holland Furnace Co. Ince -= Continued. George A. Mize & Mrs. George A. Rise vs. co 1 Continued. Vance Hager vs J. S. Miller &/Rose Lee Miller Continued. Continued. C. B. Waugh vs. Flake Rhyne Stout Dearmon & Mrs. Lawrence E. Dear Mrs. J. C, Eage vs. Lawrence 5. --Continued. W. E. Sherrill, Sr. vs Blake cig Mrs. W. A. Windsor (certiorar page enespoont nue. . Davis, Jr- f ee gigs F 2 I. H. Davis, Jr. vs. KR. W ’ / ee lai mon -- Continued. > HAA TY North Carolina, I Iredell County. n the Superior Court November Term, 1953 Mary D. Ash Craig 4 AFFIDAVIT AND MOTION FOR ORDER FO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SHE SROULD NOT BE ATTACHED FOR CONTEMPT vs. Ludwig Ash, Jr. t Now comes, Ludwig Ash, Jr., the defendant in the above entitled action and respectfully shows to the Court: 1. That Mary D. Ash Craig, who prior to her divorce and remarriage was Mrs. Mary D. Ash, the plaintiff in the original action entitled, "Mary D, Ash vs, Ludwig Ash, Jr."; that in said original action the said Mary D. Ash Was granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, said judement being signed and entered therein at the August 1946 Civil Term of Iredell County Superior Court, which judement contained an order of the Court awarding to the plaintiff, Mary D. Ash, the care, control and custody of the minor child, Mary D. Ash, born as issue to Said marriage union; that said judement and order are incorporated herein for reference thereto, the original a duly certified copy of which judement and order will be produced at any hearing or hearings of this motion and asked to he read and considered a part hereof as if fully set out herein, 2. «chat on or about the 22nd day of August 1947 the oricinal order above referred © relative to the custody of said minor child was modified giving part tine care, custody and control of said minor child, to the defendant durine a period of approximately three months of each summer, when the North Carolina public schools are not in operation: a period of four days each months on week-ends or periods or days when the child is not attending school and during the last half of the Christzas vacation period when said child is not attendine public school, as set out in said modified order; which order is hereby incorporated herein by reference thereto, the original thereof or a duly certified copy there of will be produced at any hearing or hearings of this motion and asked to he read and considered as a part hereof 4s if dullv set out herein. 3. That the plaintiff observed provisions of the modified order until October 15, 1949 at which time and at subsequent times thereafter the plaintiff wilfully failed and refused to comply with the terms and provisions of the afore- said modified order issued inthis cause: that on January 30, 1952, the defendant filed an affidavit and motion for order for plaintiff to show cause why she should not be attached for contempt for failure to comply with the profisions of the Judge aforesaid modified order: that such an order was issued by Hon. Jd. H- Clement, r Assigned to hold Courts in the 15th Judicial District at that time; that an orde h to show cause was served on the plaintiff by the sherfff of Forsyth County, Nort H, Clement, Carolina; that the matter was heard on February 5, 1952, by Hon. J» rior Court; e ully failee plaints" Judge Presiding at the January Term 1952 of the Iredell County Supe the court found that the plaintiff had without legal justification wilf t the and refused to comply with the said modified terms of te order and tha @ °’endant requeated the plaintiff bv mail for custody of his infan rough her counsel expressed in open court that she would thereafter fully comply ith all of the terms and provisions of the said modified court order; that a duly wrtified COPY of said affidavit and order for the plaintiff to show cause why she ould not be attached with comtempt, a duly certified copy of the order for the daintiff to show cause why she should not he attached with comtempt, a duly certified spy of the order and sheriff's return and judement will be produced at the hearing hearings in this motion and are asked to he read and considered a part hereof if fully set out herein. h, That on February 24, 1952, the uefendant requested the plaintiff by mail ‘or custody of his child in compliance with the modified order on February 29, 1952¢ tut the plaintiff failed to reply to his request. That on March 16, 1952, the iefendant requested the plaintiff »y mail for custody of his child in compliance wth the modified order on March 21, 1952, beginning after school hours; that the jlaintiff refused to grant custody of the child to te defendant; that on March 23, 1§2, in compliance with the Court Order the defendant requested the plaintiff by ail for custodv of the said infant child hevinnine after school hours on March 28, 2; that defadant received no replv to his request from the plaintiff. That on gril 6th, 1952, in compliance with the court order the defendant requested the slaintiff by mail for custody of his aforesaid child for Fridav, April llth, 1952 ter school hours; that the plaintiff refused to grant custody of the said child the defendant; that the plaintiff informed the defendant that the said infant thild was toint out of town with the plaintiff and the plaintiff's husband at that time, 5. That on April 20th, 1952, in compliance with the modified Court Order the t child on Friday gril 25th, 1952, after school hours: that his request was ignored. That on April the defendant requested the plantiff May 2nd, 1952, after ”, 1952, in compliance with the modified order Ymail for custody of hs aforesaid infant child on Friday, thool hours; that the plaintiff refused to grant the defendant custody of his infant r ble be “id and did inform the defendant that the said infant child would he unable to be That on May 12, 1952, in compliance with “ay at that time due to week-end school. , tody Ne modified court order the defendant requested the plaintiff by mail for cus returned from school; of his infant child for Saturday, May 17, 1952 after she had aforesaid , his "at the plaintire refused to permit the defendant to have custody of mile n Compliance with the modified at that time. That on September 15, 1952, 3 oresaid infant weer defendant requested the plaintiff >y mail for custody of his afores . was refused *hild after school hours on September 17, 1952; that the defendant was Cus tody of his child by the plaintiff. 6. That on October 14, 1952 in compliance with the modified court Tt orde the defendant requested the plaintiff byfail for custody of his aforeseia r ] ee child after school hours for October 17th, 1952: that the plaintiff ing 4 Ormed the A defendant that the aforesaid infant child was ill and would be unable to 1 ; © be away | that week-end; that on October 17, 1952 the defendant went to Winston-Salem, a and telephoned about his aforesaid infant child and was informed that the chijg 7 was in school. That on October 21, 1952 in compliance with the modified court order the defendant requested the plaintiff by mail for custody of his child after school hours on October 24, 1952; that the request was sent by registered mail and was not accepted by the plaintiff. That on October 27, 1952 in compliance with the modified order the defendant requested the plaintiff by mail for custody of his infant child on Octoher 31, 1952; that the Plaintiff informed the defendant that the child was ill and unable to be away from home: that the defendant talked with the child on October 31, 1952 and was informed by the child | that she was not sick and had heen to school every day that week. That on November 9, 1952, in conformity with the modified court order the defendant re- quested the plaintiff hy mail for custody of his infant child after school hours on November lith, 1952; that the defendant received no reply to his request. That on November 21, 1952 in conformity with the modified court order the defendant requested the plaintiff by mail for custody of his infant child on November 26, 1952; that the defendant received no reply from the plantiff. That on December 2nd, 1952 in conformity with the modified court order the defendant requested the plaintiff by mail for custody of his child after school hours on Friday December 5th, 1952: that the defendant received no reply to his request. 7. That on December 21, 1952, in conformity with the modified court order the defendant requested the plaintiff by registered mail for custody of his child for one-half of Christmas Holidays; that the plaintiff refused to accept same. That on January 6, 1953, in conformity with the modified court order the defendant requested the plaintiff by mail for custody of his child after school hours on January 9, 1953; that the defendant received no reply to his request. That January 20, 1953 in conformity with the modified court order the defendant request the plaintiff by mail for custody of his child after school hours on January ard 1953; that the defendant received no reply to his request. That on January 2, int 1953 intonformity with the modified court order the defendant requested the - by mail for custody of his child after school hours on January 30, 19533 - the defendant received no reply to his request. That on February 8 , 1953s ” ff conformity with the modified court order the defendant requested the plaint! + that by mail for custody of his child after school hours on February 13, 19533 y 17, 1953, 3 he plaintiff 19533 1953, # by nai! the defendant received no reply to his request. That on Februar conformity with the modified court order the defendant requested t by mail for custody of his child after school hours on February 20th, the defendant received no reply to his request, That on February 23rd, tiff conformity with the modified order the defendant requested the plain Mm: defendant received no replv to his request. ¢ Ss} te "odified Court order for the remainder of the Christmas holiday “atesvilie : As % eustody of his child after school hours for February 27, 1953, That the child wplied t this tétter. g, That on April 12, 1953, in conformity with the modified court order the iefendant requested the plaintiff by mail for custody of his child after school srs on April 17th, 1953; that the defendant received no reply to his request. vg on April 27, 1953, inéonformity with the modified court order the defendant requested the plaintiff by mail for custody of his child after school hours on Mav nd, 1953: that the defendant received no replv to his request. That on May llth, : 3 in conformity with the modified court order the defendant requested the aintiff by mail for custody of his child after school hours for may 15, 1953: that That on May 19, 1953, in conformity ith the mal ified court order the defendant requested the plaintiff hy mail for ustody Of his child for summer school vacation period hecinning June 2, 1953. The nquuest was sent to the plaintiff hv recistered mail and it was not accepted hy the laintiff; that on May 29th, 1953 in conformity with the modified court order the “fendant requested the plaintiff by mail for custody of child for June 2, 1953 ‘tr summer school vacation period; that the defendant received no reply to his request ‘or the plaintiff; that on June 1, 1953, the defendant went to Winston-Salem, N. C., wi while there sent a teleeram to the plaintiff requestinz custody of the child on tafternoon of June 2nd, 1953 for the summer school vacation period in conformity ith thamodified court order: that the telecram was delivered by telephone to the ‘laintiff; that the defendant called at the hore of the plaintiff for his child on me 2nd, 1953: that the aforesaid infant child informed the defendant that her mother, “e pkintiff, was sending her to a summer camp and that she could not leave with the infant child during the “endant. That the defendant was denied custody of his wner vacation period of 1953 hy the plantiff in violation of the adresaid modified mt order: that the defendant did not receive custody of his infant child in nformity with the aforesaid modified court order either in September, October, or vember 1953. h 9. That on December 15, 1953, the defendant requested the plaintiff by ‘tistered special delivery letter for the custody of his child in compliance with er was “modified order for half of the Christmas vacation period: that the lett ; he n Winston-Salem, N. C., in an “endant telephoned to the plaintiff at her home i the modified court “fort to Obtain the custody of his child in compliance with that on December 27, 1953, the defendant Tde . . that no one answered the telephone; mpliance with in co © ‘elegram to the plaintiff requesting custody of his child that he Western Union telegraph operator in fendant that the plaintiff was siekeinn 28 eRe eren N. C., informed the d mber 2%, 1953, the defend ant telephoned to ‘» at her mother's home; that on Dece Q the plaintiff at her mother's home in Statesville, N, a ee Purpees or 3 WHEREFORE, Ludwig Ash, Jr., the defendant in the above entitled action, OF again | requesting the custody of his child for the remainder of the Christmas vacati soves the Court that an order issue requiring the Plaintiff, Mary D, Ash Craig on period in compliance with the m@ ified Court order of custody; w appear at such time and place as may be designated by the Court, and show — “efendant h be, why she should not 4 hed f was unable to talk with the plaintiff hut that he did talk with the child's ee ne attached for contempt; that this : or affidavits he read and i > : ‘ stepfather; that the defendant did request the child's Stepfather for the Custod —" nd considered in support of this motion. Ody h dav of July, 1951. of the said child, Mary D. Ash: that the childts Stepfather did deliver the saiq — : Ludwig Ash, Jr, infant child to the defendant for a period of approximately four hours on Sisal Defendant - Movant 28, 1953; that the plaintiff and her hushand, the child's Stepfather, did cal) Hugh G. Mitchell Attorney for Defendant - Movant at the defendant's home on December 28th, 1953, and did remove the Child from the forth Carolina, = ~ Ss sata ta e Swe -. Ss caine . = or - SS : aS * oe <= aan aon ee. os oe awe = = - = ee —~ = ioe Loa Panna ae eae “ — aaa ee a . - - - : —s = — * soy - x : ee Er 7. ry “ - = 4 2 .: zs tS 5 s 2g “ : osname oaenemnenen aceite : . — ——— < custody of the defendant; that the defendant did request the plaintiff for the Iredell County. custody of his child for the remainder of the vacation period as provided for in Ludwig Ash, Jr., being first duly sworn, according to law, deposes and says: the modified court order for custody; that the plaintiff did refuse to grant the that he is the Petitioner, Movant and that he has read the foresoing and annexed defendant's request for custody of the said child. retition and Affidavit; that the facts therein stated are true of his own knowledze 10. That on May 27, 195, the defendant, Ludwic Ash, Jr., sent a regis- except those matters and things therein stated upon information and belief and as tered special delivery letter to the plaintiff requesting the custody of his to those he believes it to he true. child in compliance with the modified Court order for the summer vacation period; sa Ludwis AS. Jr Jr etitioner - Affiant - Movant that the aforesaid letter was returned to the defendant unclaimed; that the jubscribed and sworn to before me, defendant went to the plaintiff's home in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, on June ; this the 30th day of July, 195/. i L, 1954 to get his aforesaid child for the summer vacation period: that there was tur L. L. Nesbit N no one at the home of the plaintiff at the time the defendant was there at veputy C. S. Ce i approximately 3:00 p. m.: that the defendant left the home of the plaintiff but iii before leaving Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for the defendant's home in NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IKEDELL COUNTY, Statesville, North Carolina, the defendant telephoned the plaintif's residence | ‘ary D. Ash, Craiz 4 in the hope that the plaintiff had returned to her home with the child, Mary D. SHERIFF'S RETURN vs 4 Ash, in order that the defendant could get the child and bring her back to oe ss widwig Ash, Jr. i ’ . e . . ie Statesville, N. C., to spend her summer vacation period with the defendant, Received the 2h day of August, 1954, in the above entitled action, the Order father; that the defendant received no anawer to his aforesaid telephone call; the Notice and Order to Show Cause, and Yirected to the Sheriff of Forsyth County, ; t telegrams f each of the that the defendant has heen unable to cet the plaintiff to accep ’ the Affidavit and Motion of the defendant, together with a copy © phone calls, or resistered mail from the defendant whichte has addressed to the cis : , {ance oe ed on plaintiff in. an effort to obtain the custody of his aforesaid child in compl The attached Order Directed to the Sheriff of Forsyth County, was serv stody , ’ sading the with the aforesaid modified court order. That the defendant has not had cu the plaintirr, Mary D. Ash Craiz, on the 25 day of August, 1954, by reading of time and on of his aforesaid child at any time during the summer school vacation period te to her and hy delivering to her a copy of te same, and at ~~ . ' : COpV of the 1954, in violation of the aforesaid modified Court order by the plantiff ™ the same date, by delivering to the plaintiff, Mary D. Ash Craig, 4 P a " ndant si ; Motion of the ll. ‘That except for a brief time on December 2%, 1953, the defe Notice and Order to Show Cause, and a copy of the ena oF ‘ although the not had the custody of his aforesaid child since March 21, 1953, the lefendant,, hereto attached. rmity with defendant has frequently requested the custody of his child in canfo This the 25 day of Aucust, 1954. ontinues *° E. G, Shore aforesaid modified court order; that the plaintiff has refused and ¢ Sheriff of Forsyth County the refuse to grant him the custody of His aforesaid child in conformity with H, L. wood qver the BY 7 orsth County foresaid modified court order; that the failure of the plaintiff to del eputy Sheriff, with the $1.50 paid. child into the care, custody and control of the defendant in compliance excase: modified court order has heen wilful and without legal justification and pa North Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court Mary D. Ash Craig, 5 Plaintiff 4 vs { ORDER Ludwig Ash, Jr., ‘ Defendant TO THE SHERIFF OR OTHER LAWFUL OFFICER OF Forsyth COUNTY-GREETING: You are hereby commanded and ordered to summons Mary D, Ash Craig, the plaintiff in the above entitled action, to appear hefore the undersicned Judge on Wednesdav__, September lst, 1954, at 1:30 o'clock, P. Me, at the Courthouse of Cabarrus County, in the city of Concord, North Carolina, and show Cause, if any there be, why she should not te attached for contempt in failing and refusine to comply with the orders heretofore entered in the ahove cause with respect to the care, custody, and control of Mary D. Ash, a minor child, born to the plaintifs and defendant. You are further ordered and commanded to serve the ahove order by reading the same to the plaintiff and by the delivering a copy of same to her together with the copy of the motion and affidavit of the defendant filed in this cause. Herein fail not and of this process make due return to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. This the 3 day of Aueust, 195. J. C, Rudisill Judge of Superior Court NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Mary D. Ash Craie, Plaintiff vs ORDER Ludwig Ash, Jr. Defendant Order for the plaintiff to show cause why she should not be attached for contempt. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Undersigné? Judge at the Auzust Term 1954 Superior, Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the motion and affidavit of the defendant Lud" Ash, Jr. filed in the ahove entiled action that the plaintiff Mary D. Ash Craig th respect has wilfully violated the terms of certain orders entered in this cause Wi o the to the care, custody, and control of Mary D. Ash, a minor child, born t . laint?’’ plaintiff and defendant. It is therefore ordered that Mary D. Ash Craigs P on in this cause, appear hefore the undersigned Judze of the Superior Court house in Gonce e should ré, Wednesday, September 1st 1954 at 1:30 o'clock, P. M., at the Court Cabarrus County, North Carolina, and show cause, if any she has, why sh not de punished as for a contempt of this court. it is further ordered that a spy of the affidavit and motion filed hy the defendant be served upon the plaintiff, along with a copy of this order, This the 3 dav of August, 1954. a. ——— Judze of Superior Court eee eee ee y0RTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ) wRY D. ASH CRAIG . Plaintiff - Vs. - WOWIG ASH, Jr., Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ORDER THIS CAUSE Coming on to he heard and heins heard hefore the Honorable J. C. Ydisill, Judge Presiding over the November, 1954 term of Superior Court, Iredell county, North Carolina, upon an Order issued by this Court upon Motion filed in this cause by the defendant, Ludwig Ash, Jr., for the plaintiff to appear and show cause why she should not he attached for contempt in failing and refusing to comply with the Orders heretofore entered in the above-entitled cause with respect to the care, custody, and control of Mary D. Ash, a minor child, born to the plaintiff and defendant, and it appearing to the Court that the parties to this action have settled their differences, and it further appearing to the Court that beth parties have appeared through their counsel and requested that the aforementioned Order be dissolved: E b It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Order issued by the Court in this cause for the plaintiff to appear and show cause why she should Not be attached for contempt he and it is hereby dissolved. CONSENTED TOs Mary D. Ash Craic i a evlatecir? luted Ash, Jr. erendant J.C, Rudisil] ________ ————Yudee of The Superior Court NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. MARY D. ASH CRAIG, Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, vs. LUDWIG ASH, JR., Defendant } This Cause Boming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable J. C. Rudisill, Judge Presiding at the November 1954 Term of Superior Court Iredell County, North Carolina, by consent of the parties to this nia ites appearing to the Court that Mary D. Ash Craic was granted an absolute divorce fror the defendant, Ludwig Ash, Jr. in the Aucust 1916 Term of The Superior Court of Iredell County; and it further appearing to the Court that the Custody and contro} of the minor child of the plaintiff and defendant, Mary Davis Ash, was awarded to the plaintiff, subject to an arreement previously entered into between the parties hereto: And it further appearing to the Court that upon motion of the defendant made in May 1947 Term of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, the judgment ¢ranted in this matter concerning the custody, control and support of the said child was set aside and partial custody and control of said child was awarded to the defendant, and it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have agreed to a further modification of said Judement; It is, therefore, Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that the Judgment previously entered in this matter in the Aucust 1947 term of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, concerning the custody, control, and support of the minor child, Mary Davis Ash, be and it is hereby set aside. It is further ordered, adjudsed and decreed that the minor child, Mary Davis Ash, shall he delivered hy the plaintiff, Mary D. Ash Craig to the defendant, Ludwig Ash, Jr., by 5:00 o'clock, p.m., on November 15, 1954 at the defendant's resiience at 643 Walnut Street, Statesville, North Carolina; that the said defendart, Ludwie Ash, Jr. he, and he is hereby eranted custody and control of the said minor child, Marvy Davis Ash, from said date, to-wit: November 15, 1954 until the end of the North Carolina Public School Year in Statesville, North Carolina, to-wit: until June 1, 1955. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that effective as of the daté of this Judement, the plaintiff, Marv D. Ash Craic, shall have custody of the mint child, Mary Davis Ash, durinz all of the entire summer vacation periods of the North Carolina Public Schools in Statesville, North Carolina, until further orders of this Court, and that the plaintiff, Mary D. Ash Crais, shall have custody * said minor child during one-half of all Christmas vacation periods of the North of Carolin a Public Schools in Statesville, North Carolina, until further order year whether this Court, and that the plaintiff shall have the right to elect each se shall have custody of said minor child during the first half or the latter lf of said Christmas vacation period; provided, that the plaintiff and defendant stall each have custody of said minor child for one-half of each Christmas Day. It is further ordered, adjudsed and decreed that effective as of the first aay of the North Carolina Public School year 1955-1956 in Statesville, North wrolina, the defendant Ludwisz Ash, Jr., shall have Custody and control of the nor child, Mary Davis Ash, during all of the entire North Carolim Public school years in Statesville, North Carolina, except for one-haf of each Christmas vcation period each year until further order of this Court. It is further ordered, adjudzed and decreed that the plaintiff and defendant rein shall each have the risht on reasonable notice to the other and at any reasonable time, but not more than two times in each calendar month, to take the said minor child, Mary Davis Ash, away from the house in which the said child is then residing, for the purpose of reasonable exercise or entertainment for not more than 12 hours on each of said two visits in each calendar month, but saigfinor child may not be taken out of the city in which said child is residing and said rinor child shall be returned hy the visitine party to the house in which she is residine not later than 12 hours from the time said child was taken from said house and not later than 9:00 p.m. on the date she was taken fror said house on each of said two times in each calendar month, provided further said visits shall not interfere with the public school hours of said child while she is attending public school during the North Carolina public school years in Statesvile, North ‘arolina. It is further ordered, adjudzed and decreed that at the end of each period of time that the plaintiff or the defendant herein respectively have custody and control of said minor child, Mary Davis Ash, as set forth in this Order, that the arty having custody and control of said child shall immediately deliver the said tinor child, Mary Davis Ash, to the other party at the place of residence of said ther party in North Carolina, provided that if the plaintiff elects to have ld during the first half ool vears in Statesville, hortn . of any Christmas “ustody and contol of said minor chi ‘acation period of the North Carolina Public Sch “arolina, as herein provided and due to physical disabili North Carolina, is unable gical husband, J. A. Craiz, Jr., from Winston-Salem, s Ash, to the defendant at the place ‘© deliver the said minor child, Mary Davi th Carolina by 3 pem. on Christmas T residence of said defendant in Statesville, Nor that the plaintiff shall notify the defendant 0 *Y of such Christmas vacation period , least 24 hours prior | ig Lo o d : 7 Christmas Day that she will be unable to delive | aid defendant in Statesville, “UStody Of the defendant at the place of residence of s nd, provided further that the plaintiff ’ “rth Carolina, on such Christmas Day 4 | tody of th mall deliver said minor child, Mary Davis Ash, to the custody em, North Carolina, e defendant in on such the Lobby of the Robert &. Lee Hotel In winston-Sal It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant, Ludwig Ash, Jr., shall pay to the plaintiff, Marv D. Ash Craiz, the sum of $25.00 for the support of their minor chid, Mary Davis Ash, from November 1, 1954 to November 15. 1954 and the sum of $50.00 per month for the Support of their minor child, Mary Davis Ash for such months that the said minor child, Mary Davis Ash, is in the custody of the plaintiff, Mary lJ. Ash Craige. This cause is left open until further order of this Court. This the 15th day of November, 1954. oO. Rudisill Judee Presiding, ii The parties to the above action herehy waive any defect in rpocedure, jurisdiction, and venue, and consent to the entering of the above Judgment, Ludwig Ash, Jr, Defendant wary D. Ash Craig Piaineirr ——_—__ Hugh G, bitchell _John J. Surratt Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintit? ROI A Rak gai got g gai tc alate aca ake aoa ae ale ae ae ae ae YNC. 5132 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Germann-Compton Motors, Ine ) vs. JUDGMENT sam A. Brown & Lorene W. Prown 4 This cause coming on to he heard and heinz heard hefore the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that thev he allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that rivht: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged bv the Court that this cause be, . tary and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff heine allowed to take a volun C f pay nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudred by the Court that the plaintiff pé the costs of this action. This the lst dav of Januarv, 195/. Clerk Superior Court eHSeeegeeegaecee & s NO. 516k NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IKEDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Commonwealth of Virrinia, Ex Rel H. G. Gilmer V8~ JUDGMENT H. A. Beaver ' This cause cominz on to he heard and heins heard hefore the undersicned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that thev he allowed to take a voluntarv nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that richt: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudzed by the Court that this cause he, and the same is herehy nonsuited, the plaintiff heine allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adiudted hv the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs o this action. This the lst dav of Januarv, 195). _.—_ Ve Ge Smith Clerk Superior Court eee RR RK KK RK OK OK H No. 5632 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY C. D. Kenny Division, Consolidated ) jrocers Corporation ; a ) JUDGMENT ) ) This cause, comine on to he heard hefore the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of VS. J. We. Morrison Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion bv the plaintiff for a judement; And it appearine to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 30th dav of Uctober, 1953: that the defendant owned real Property in Iredell County, North Carolina: that service of summons was obtained by publication on the defendant in the manner prescribed hv law; that the summons was J Morrison could not he found in Iredell] returned endorsed as provided hy law that J. W. vountv: that an affidavit was made to the same effect; that the Clerk of the Superior Court mailed a recistered letter to the last known address of the defendant and made 4 certificate as provided by law to the same effect; And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer or other Pleading was filed hy the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings was "ranted and that the time within which pleadines micht be filed has expired; 1] . y! 4 i } { ea by [ : ue i } F ae It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant, Ludwig W Ash, Jr., shall pay to the plaintiff, Mary D. Ash Craiz, the sum of $25,009 for th e support of their minor chid, Mary Davis Ash, from November 1, 1954 to November 1s, 1954 and the sum of $50.00 per month for the support of their minor child, Mary Davis Ash for such months that the said minor child, Mary Davis Ash, is in the custody of the plaintiff, Mary D. Ash Craig. This cause is left open until further order of this Court, This the 15th day of November, 1954. C. Kudisill Taine Presiding, —— The parties to the ahove action hereby waive any defect in rpocedure, jurisdiction, and venue, and consent to the entering of the above Judgment, Ludwie Ash, Jr, Defendant Mary D. Ash Craig Plaintiff — eae Hugh G, Mitchell _ Attorney for Defendant John J. Surratt Attorney for Plaintiff MEE SE eR a a ea ake ake ae ek ae a a ae ae alk ate ae ate ae ale a ale oe YNO. 5132 NORTH CAROLINA ‘IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Germann-Compton Motors, Ine ' VS. eee Ue Sar A. Brown & Lorene W. Brown 4 This cause coming on to he heard and hein heard hefore the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that they he allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearint to the Court that the plaintiff has that ricvht: It is, therefore, ordered and adiudged hy the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff heine allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudeed by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This the lst dav of January, 195/.. C. G, Smith Clerk Superior Court a No. 5L6k NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Commonwealth of Vireinia, Ex Rel H. G. Gilmer VS. H. Aw Beaver , , oo. \ -—— — — — This cause coming on to he heard and hein heard hefore the undersiened Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntarv nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks that thev he allowed to take a voluntarv nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that richt: at ts, therefore, ordered and adjudred by the Court that this cause he, and the same is herehy nonsuited, the plaintiff heine allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudted bv the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs o this action. This the lst dav of Januarv, 1954. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court eeexeeeueuee Ke Kk kK K HK & Aio. 5632 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY C. D. Kenny Division, Consolidated ) Grocers Corporation JUDGMEN? ) ) This cause, comine on to he heard hefore the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of VS. J. We. Morrison Superior Court of Iredell Countv, upon motion by the plaintiff for a judgement; And it appearine to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 30th dav of October, 1953: that the defendant owned real Property in Iredell County, North Carolina: that service of summons was obtained by publication on the defendant in the manner prescrihed hv law; that the summons was returned endorsed as provided hy law that J. W. Morrison could not he found in Iredell County; that an affidavit was made to the same effect; that the Clerk of the Superior Court mailed a revistered letter to the last known address of the defendant and made 4 certificate as provided by law to the same effect; And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer or other Pleading was filed hy the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings was ‘ranted and that the time within which pleadines micht be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that No. 53800 the cause of action cnnsistine of a hreach of an express contract to pay a ‘ a of money fixed by a contract, namely, the sum of One Hundred Twenty a a coho eo IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 30/100 IREDELL COUNTY ini Vet: tee ($123.30) Dollars, with interest from March 6, 1953; Winnte Wochay Drummer, ¢ | And it also appearing to the Court that pursuant to the prayer in the Plaintiff, : | plaintiff's complaint an order of attachment was issued and property belonzing to vs : ORDER a the defendant consisting of a crocerv store on Rickert Street in Statesville, asa ie ; i North Carolina, was attached by the Sheriff of Iredell County and notice of saiq This cause comine on to he heard, and heing heard, upon a Motion to dismiss, r q attachment entered on the records in the office of Clerk of Superior Court of filed by the defendant who made a special appearance for this purpose, and it La tredeli County. appearing to the Court that this action was commenced by issuance of a summons on iM Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff the 22nd day of June, 195) under the Provisions of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement ) have and recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred Twenty Three & 30/100 of Support Act, and it further appearing from the record of thie cause thet no ’ ($123.30) Dollars, with interest tereon from March 6, 1953, and the cost of this children were born of the union of the parties and that the wife is a resident of the action; that said sum he recovered by the plaintiff from the said Property so State of Virzinia and that the defendant is a bona fide resident of Iredell County, attached; that W. I. Ward, Jr. is hereby ordered and directed to offer said property North Carolina, and it ‘urther appearing that the Courts of Vircinia have never re- for sale after advertisine same as provided bv law for a period of at least thirty quired jurisiiction over the defendant: (30) days: this cause is retained for further order. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudced and decreed, upon Motion on McLaughlin This Noverber 6, 1951. and Battley, Attorneys for the defendant, that said proceedin> be, and the same is C. Ge Smith hereby, dismissed and the defendant is ordered discharced. Clerk of Superior Court This the Ath dav of Aueust, 1951. ok mom me wk me me me me ee ke ok wok ok oe ok J.e_C, Rudisill i i an Judge Presiding | eekeekeKeKR RR EE HH NORTH CAROLINA tk en IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT No. 5837 J. M. Warner, J. M. Sample, $ NORTH CAROLINA and Clarence Stimpson, Jeo, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiffs, : IREDELL COUNTY -vs- $ JUDGMENT Prentice-Hall, ine. laintiff I, T. Speaks and wife, : a Olivia L. Speaks, : vs. ) JUDGMENT Defendants. : i tia , . Clerk + Wesley Emery, doing business This cause coming on to he heard hefore his Honor, Carl G, Smith, as George H, Emery & Company, , the Court Defendant Superior Court, on this the l2th dav of November ,195/, and it appearing to ’ This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, Clerk of re than thirty that summons has he 2d h f the defendants, and that more Te ee ' the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgement days have elapsed and no answer has been filed herein: ffs against the defendant by default final; The C further f he Defendants are indebted to the Paint! © vourt further finds that the Defen And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons in the amount of 409.5%, with interest from May 6, 1954, until paid; issued ion on the 2th day of Aucust, 195i: IT IS, THEREFORE, Ordered, adjudeed, and decreed that the Plaintiffs on on Sere Cree h ith co : . a: ere ‘ May 6, 195bs until And it further appearing to the court that said summons together w copy rom ™ ’ , — en oe or mens th. Sane Se of said complint were served on the defendant on the 6th day of October, 1954; wErt> Gee TRF Whe Setentenns be Samed wih She ones OF thhe OP And it further appearing to the court that no answer, derurrer, or other pleading foots ot leadings has been Clerk Superior Court has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleading eranted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; kee Ke ee Oe ke ke ek KR Ok OK “No. And it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that th @ money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Seven Hundred Ninety-two & 36/100 ($792 %6) cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sun of Dollars with interest thereon from the lst day of January, 195k; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintire have and recover of the defendant the sum of Seven Hundred Ninety-two & 36/100 ($792.36) Dollars, with interest thereon from the lst day of January, 1954, and the costs of this action. This 19th day of Novemher, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court mom wk ee mk me we ke ke kk kk ok 5838 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff VS ! { ' Annie McKee, single, Vivian YcKee ‘ Wilson and hushand, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Wiley McKee, ' and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A. “cKee, heine all of the t children,their husbands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, ' ‘ary Bell 8lakhurn McKee, and all other persons chimine anv interest in the } lands described ig the 6orplaint, and Iredell County, North Carolina, f Defendants — eee ee THIS CAUSE coming on to he heard, and heine heard hefore the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, on this the 26th dav of October, 1954, At said hearine it appeared to the Court that: I A duly verified Complaint was filed hy the plaintiff in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on the 25th day of August, 1954. II e Superior Summons as to all the defendants was issued hy the Clerk of th Court of Iredell County on the 25th day of August, 195h. III within the That the defendant Iredell County accepted service of summons that the defendants time required by law, to-wit on the 25th day of August, 1954: bin e, widow of Mile! ’ Annie McKee, Vivian McKee Wilson and hushand, Fred Wilson, Veo McKe ' their v children, McKee, and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A. McKee, being all the Kee, 1 Blackburn Me husbands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bel to-wit! ded, rovi wae personally served in the manner and within the time as by law P Lucille Dean McKee on the 13th day of September, 1954, and all of the others aforenamed on the 30th day of August, 1951, except Fred Wilson who was served on the 3lst day of August, 1954. IV That the time Prescribed hv law during which the defendants mi plead to the plaintiffts Complaint has expied eht appear and » and the defendants and all of them, except Iredell County, have not appeared or pleaded in anv manner to the plaintiff's Complaint, and the time Prescrihed hy law durinz which any person having an interest in the subject matter of this action that richt appear and set up his, her, or their claim has expired, and no such person has appeared or set up or defended any such claim, except Iredell County, one of the defendants herein, Vv y That the defendant Iredell County filed its answer to the Plaintiff's Complaint admittine all the allevations set Out in the plaintiffts Complaint and settine up in its said answer a claim for taxes due to Iredell County azainst the property described in the Complaint in the total sum of $157.27, said Answer havine been filed on the l5th day of Octoher, 1951, VI This action was not commenced prior to six months after the l2th day of September, 1949, The Court at said hearin upon the verified Corplaint “iled by the plaintiff and the verified Answer filed hy the defendant, Iredell Countv, finds the following facts: (a) A tax sale certificate for 194% City of Statesville taxes listed in the name of Governor McKee avainst real estate hereinafter described fully, was issued to the plaintiff on the 12th dav of Septerher, 1949, hy the tax collector of the City of Statesville after said tax collector had advertised said real estate and had sold Said real estate for said taxes at the tire and in the manner provided by law, Plaintiff heing the hichest bidder for said real estate at said sale, said taxes were duly and repularly assessed and levied. (b) and unpaid thereon the sum of $6.71, with penalty on said sum at the rate of 6% per Plaintiff is the holder of said tax sale certificate and there is due annum from and after the 12th dav of September, 1949 until paid. (c) levied by the plaintiff avainst the defendants' property and said taxes, including That the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff for Subsequent taxes interest and penalties, advertising and costs less the 1948 taxes total $40.00. (c) to the plaintiff for taxes from 1948 throuch 1953 in the sum of $46.81 which taxes That the defendants except Iredell County, and each of them are indebted “ere duly and reeularly assessed and levied against the property hereinafter described. (e) That during the vear 1950 the plaintiff paved and hard Surfaced street running along side and adjacent to the property hereinafter describe to the defendant's, namely East Sharpe Street, improvine the value of the Property and the plaintiff has duly and properly assessed and levied upon the Said Property of the defendants for the special henefits accruine to them Pursuant to the terns of the said City’s charter and the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina appertaining to street assessments by municipalities; that said Street a8sessments are now due the plaintiff in the sum of 8301.62 including penalties, interest, and costs; that the plaintiff durinz the year 1939 Paved and hardsurfaced & side walk running along side and adjacent to the property aforesaid on South Green Street, improving the value of the property aforesaid and under and pursuant to the terns of the charter of the Citv of Statesville and the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina appertainine thereto the plaintiff assessed the defendants for such special henefits in the sum of $18.75: that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $18.75 and that the interest and penalties accrued thereon total £17.0%, makine a crand total for sidewalk assessments now due by the defendants to the plaintiff in the sum of $35.83: that during the year 1942 the plaintiff paved and hardsurfaced a street running aloneside and adjacent to the property hereinafter described helondne to the defendants, namely South Green Street, improvinz the value of the property and the plaintiff has duly and properly assessed and levied upon the said property of the defendants for the special benefits accruing to them pursuant to the terms of the said City's charter and the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina appertaining to street assessments by municipalities: that the principal sum of the said street assessment for the Said South Green Street was £11.00, that the interest and penalties accrued thereon totaled $8.34, makine a total of £19.34 now due for the street assessments against the said property for the pavine as aforesaid on South Green Street; that the defendants are indehted to the plaintiff for street and sidewald assessments in the total sum of %359.79 and for taxes in the sum of $46.%1, making a grand total due the plaintiff by the defendants, except Iredell County, of $406.60 NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjiudzed, and decreed: ept Iredell (1) That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, exceP County, the sum of 416.81 for taxes, including interests, penalties, and costs, for the years 19/2 throuch 1953 inclusive: and that the defendants Annie McKee, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Wiley ed and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A. McKee, being all of the a wiekee, aint, d in the Compl and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands describe a reasonable Black husbands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bell except Iredell County, pav the costs of this action, including 4 t all Court; tha for plaintiff's attorney, the same to he hereafter fixed by the ; as on certé said sums, penalties, costs, and fees constitute a first lien uP estate descrihed as follows: n the st! 4 d Street BEING Lot No. 8 in part C of the Cowles property on 7” of Statesville, N.C. as shown on map of said property which map has been duly recorded in the office of the Retister of Deeds for Iredell County. Said lot fronts on Green Street and reference is hereby made to the above- mentioned map of the Cowles property for a more particular description of said lot. (2) That the defendant Iredell County have and recover of the dfendants Annie McKee, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Wiley McKee, and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A, McKee, beine all of the children, their hushands and wives, of the late Governor MeKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn MeKee, and all other Persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, the full sum of $157.27 for taxes, including interests, penalties, and costs, for the vears 192% throuch 195) inclusive: and that the said defendants pay the costs of this action as aforesaid, including a fee of $3.00 for the attorney for the defendant Iredell County: that all said Sums, int@ests, penalties, costs, and fees constitute a first lien upon the real estate descrihed above, (3) That the plaintiff have and rcover of and from the defendants, Annie MeKee, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Niley MeKee, and Lucille Dean MeKee, widow of JOhn A. MeKee, heine all of te children, their husbands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary 3ell RBlackhurn McKee, and all other persons claimine anv interest in the lands described in the Complaint, except Iredell County, the sum of $359.79 for Street assessments and sidewalk assessments and improvements: that the defendants, except Iredell County shall pay the cost of this action as aforesaid, including a reasonable fee for plaintiff's attorney the same to he hereafter fixed hy the Court: that all said sums, penalties, costs, and fees constitite a first lien upon the propertv hereinabove described. (4) That this Judgment he declared a first lien upon the real estate here- inabove descrihed, and superior to anv title, interest, claim, or lien that any of the defendants have, have had or may have in or to said property, except Iredell County as aforesdd. (5) That R. A. Hedrick he and he is hereby appointed a Commissioner of this Court to forthwith sell the above-described real estate, and the said R. A. Hedrick, as Commissioner is hereby directed to sell said real estate at public auction for cash to the last and hichest bidder, after notice of said sale shall have been published at the Courthouse door of Iredell County for a period of 30 days and shall have heen Published in the Statesvilie Record and Landmark once a week for four consecutive weeks, and he shall require of and from the last and highest bidder at such sale a Cash deposit in the amount of 10% of the total bid, and after the confirmation of said Sale by the Court, the said R. A. Hedrick, Commissioner, shall upon payment of the Purchase price, execute a deed conveying to the purchaser the real estate hereinabove described, in fee simple, and the said R. A. Hedrick, Commissioner, shall apply the Proceeds of said sale as follows: y | a oer at ae el one a aes — A re aed in aalaaaall See ee * basgies See ote (e) That during the vear 1950 the plaintiff paved and hard Surfaced a street running along side and adjacent to the property hereinafter describe to the defendant's, namely Hast Sharpe Street, improvine the value Of the property and the plaintiff has duly and properlv assessed and levied upon the said Property of the defendants for the special henefits accruing to them pursuant to the terns of the said City's charter and the General Statutes of the State of North Caroling appertaining to street assessments by municipalities; that said Street a8Sessments are now due the plaintiff in the sum of 4304.62 including Penalties, interest, ang costs; that the plaintiff durine the vear 1939 paved and hardsurfaced a side walk runnine along side and adjacent to the property aforesaid on South Green Street, improving the value of the property aforesaid and under and pursuant to the terns of the charter of the Citv of Statesville and the General Statutes of the Stte of North Carolina appertainine thereto the plaintiff assessed the defendants for such special henefits in the sum of $18.75: that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $18.75 and that the interest and penalties accrued thereon total £17.0%, makine a errand total for sidewalk assessments now due by the defendants to the plaintiff in the sum of 335.83: that during the year 1942 the plaintiff paved and hardsurfaced a street running aloneside and adjacent to the property hereinafter described *elondne to the defendants, namely South Green Street, improvinz the value of the property and the plaintiff has duly and properly assessed and levied upon the said property of the defendants for the special benefits accruing to them pursuant to the terms of the said City's charter and the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina appertainine to street assessments by municipalities: that the principal sum of the said street assessment for the Said South Green Street was $11.00, that the interest and penalties accrued thereon totaled $8.34, makine a total of £19.34 now due for the street assessments against the said property for the pavine as aforesaid on South Green Street; that the defendants are indehted to the plaintiff for street and sidewald assessments in the total sum of 8359.79 and for taxes in the sum of 546.%1, making a erand total due the plaintiff hy the defendants, except Iredell County, of $406.60 NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adiudzed, and decreed: ept Iredell (1) That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, exceP and costs, County, the sum of $46.21 for taxes, including interests, penalties, nie McKee, for the years 191% throuch 1953 inclusive: and that the defendants An i Wile McKee, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of y il jldren, and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A. McKee, being all of the ch i Mec ‘ 1 Blackburn husbands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bel Complaint, d in the and all other persons claimine any interest in the lands describe ‘a reasonable except Iredell Countv, pav the costs of this action, including a ail Court; ¢ for plaintiff's attorney, the same to be hereafter fixed by the ] in rea on certa said sums, penalties, costs, and fees constitute a first lien uP estate described as follows: t in the city dd Stree BEING Lot No. * in part C of the Cowles property on Ta of Statesville, N. C. as shown on map of said property which map has been duly recorded in the office of the Rezister of Deeds for Iredell County. Said lot fronts on Green Street and reference is hereby made to the above- mentioned map of the Cowles property for a more particular description of said lot. (2) That the defendant Iredell County have and recover of the dfendants Annie McKee, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Nilson, Veo McKee, widow of Wiley McKee, and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of John A, McKee, beine all of the children, their hushands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary Bell Blackburn McKee, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, the full sum of $157.27 for taxes, including interests, penalties, and costs, for the vears 1928 throuch 1954 inclusive: and that the said defendants pay the costs of this action as aforesaid, includine a fee of 53.00 for the attorney for the defendant Iredell County: that all said sums, inte@ests, penalties, costs, and fees constitute a first lien upon the real estate descrihed ahove, (3) That the plaintiff have and recover of and from the defendants, Annie McKee, Vivian McKee Wilson and husband, Fred Wilson, Veo McKee, widow of Niley McKee, and Lucille Dean McKee, widow of JOhn A. MeKee, beine all of te children, their husbands and wives, of the late Governor McKee and wife, Mary 8ell RBlackhurn McKee, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the Complaint, except Iredell County, the sum of $359.79 for street assessments and sidewalk assessments and improvements: that the defendants, except Iredell County shall pay the cost of this action as aforesaid, includine a reasonable fee for plaintiff's attorney the same to he hereafter fixed hv the Court: that all said sums, penalties, costs, and fees constitite a first lien upon the property hereinabove described. (4) That this Judgment be declared a first lien upon the real estate here- inabove described, and superior to anv title, interest, claim, or lien that any of the defendants have, have had or may have in or to said property, except Iredell County as aforesad. (5) That R. A. Hedrick be and he is hereby appointed a Commissioner of this Court to forthwith sell the above-described real estate, and the said R. A. Hedrick, as Commissioner is hereby directed to sell said real estate at public auction for cash to the last and hichest bidder, after notice of said sale shall have been published at the Courthouse door of Iredell County for a period of 30 davs and shall have heen Published in the Statesville Record and Landmark once a week for four consecutive weeks, and he shall require of and from the last and highest bidder at such sale a Cash deposit in the amount of 10% of the total bid, and after the confirmation of said Sale by the Court, the said R. A. Hedrick, Commissioner, shall upon payment of the Purchase price, execute a deed conveying to the purchaser the real estate hereinabove described, in fee simple, and the said R. A. Hedrick, Commissioner, shall apply the Proceeds of said sale as follows: (a) He shall first pay the costs of this action, including a reasonab) e fee for plaintiff's attorney to be hereafter fixed by the Court, and includin ga » and including Commissions allowed him, and the costs of advertising and Selling the aforesaid Pro fee for the defendants attorney in the sum of $3.00 Perty, (b) He sahll next pay the amounts due the Plaintiff, City of g 4 way of next pay the judge ment for special benefit assessments awarded to the Plaintiff, torether and the defendant, Iredell County, the amounts awarded in this Judzment by taxes, penalties and interests therefor pro rata; then shall he with interests and costs: then gall he pay pro rata taxes, penalties, interests, ang costs of taxing units which were parties to said action but which filed no answers to this action; then shall he pay pro rata any special benefit assessments of taxing units which failed to file an answer to this action torether with interests and costs on said assessments: and any halance then remaining shall he paid in accordance with the directions of this Court and particubrly to the person or persons entitled to receive said balance, or anv part thereof, which shall be paid in® the Clerk of The Superior Court of Iredell County. (c) The Commissioner shall make a full report to the Court within three days following said sale civine the full particulars thereof. (d) The Commissioner shall give a full and final report to the Court within five davs after delivery of the deed to the purchaser showing delivery of same, 4] receipt of the purchase price, and the disbursement of the proceeds, accompanied by receipts evidencing all such dishursements. This the 26 dav of October, 195h. Ce. Ge Smith i Clerk of the Superior Court mM mm we mw mk hk ke me me mk ok ok (a) He shall first pay the costs of this action, including a reasonable fee for plaintiff's attorney to be hereafter fixed by the Court, and including a fee for the defendants attorney in the sum of $3.00, and including commissions allowed him, and the costs of advertising and selling the aforesaid property, (b) He sahll next pay the amounts due the plaintiff, City of Statesville, and the defendant, Iredell County, the amounts awarded in this Judgment by way of taxes, penalties and interests therefor pro rata; then shall he next Pay the judg. ment for special benefit assessments awarded to the plaintiff, together with interests and costs: then gall he pay pro rata taxes, penalties, interests, and costs of taxing units which were parties to said action but which filed no answers to this action; then shall he pay pro rata any special henefit assessments of taxing units which failed to file an answer to this action torether with interests and costs on said assessments: and any halance then remaining shall he paid in accordance with the directions of this Court and particubrly to the person or persons entitled to receive said halane , or anv part thereof, which shall be paid ino the Clerk of The Superior Court of Iredell County. (c) The Commissioner shall make a full report to the Court within three days following said sale ctivine the full particulars thereof. (d) The Commissioner shall give a full and final report to the Court within five davs after delivery of the deed to the purchaser showing delivery of same, receipt of the purchase price, and the dishursement of the proceeds, accompanied by receipts evidencing all such dishursements. This the 26 dav of Octoher, 1954. C, G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court weme wk we wm we hk he ke mh me me oe (a) He shall first pay the costs of this action, including a reasonab) a fee for plaintiff's attorney to be hereafter fixed by the Court, and including a fee for the defendants attorney in the sum of $3.00, and including commissions allowed him, and the costs of advertising and selling the aforesaid Property, (b) He sahll next pay the amounts due the plaintiff, City of Statesville | ’ and the defendant, Iredell County, the amounts awarded in this Judgment by way of then shall he next Pay the judg- taxes, penalties and interests therefor pro rata; ment for special benefit assessments awarded to the plaintiff, toeether with interests and costs: then gall he pav pro rata taxes, penalties, interests, and costs of taxing units which were parties to said action but which filed no answers to this action; then shall he pay pro rata any special henefit assessments of taxing units which failed to file an answer to this action together with interests and costs on said assessments: and anv halance then remaining shall he paid in accordance with the directions of this Court and particubrly to the person or persons entitled to receive said balance, or anv part thereof, which shall be paid in® the Clerk of The Superior Court of Iredell County. (c) The Commissioner shall make a full report to the Court within three davs following said sale civine the full particulars thereof. (d) The Commissioner shall give a full and final report to the Court within five davs after deliverv of the deed to the purchaser showing delivery of same, receipt of the purchase price, and the dishursement of the proceeds, accompanied hy receipts evidencine all such disbursements. This the 26 dav of October, 195k. n Ue C, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court 45789 JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Fox ) ‘ ‘ raymond Ralph Fo FALL TERM, 1954 7 gdward Scheidt, Commissioner of No. 382 Iredell County. ) VS. ) Motor Vehicles of North Carolina ) This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the a Superior Court Iredell County: a Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion that there is ---- error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. v It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion { : of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable R. Hunt Parker Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS REVERSED And it is considered and adjudged further, that the plaintiff petitioner and surety ai p tothe prosecution bond Paul L. Fox do pay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, towit, the sum of Thirty-five and 25/100 dollars ($35.25), and execution - issue therefor. | apt A TRUE COPY Adrian J. Newton ad i h We Clerk of the Supreme Court. Hig ie KKK RR eR eK KK Ke KK OK K ie my #5239 m@ NORTH CAROLINA i fe IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | City of Statesville, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff a - vs - Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their ORDER ne if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, any, and all other persons claiming anv interest a the lands described in the Complaint, and Iredell ounty, North Carolina, Defendants This proceeding coming on to be heard upon the report of R. A. Hedrick, Commissioner, and it appearing to the Court that on the 26thday of November, 1954, Said Commissioner reported to the Court a sale at public auction after advertisement 48 required by law to Frank Deaton, of the land as described in the Petition, at the Price of $175.00; that said report has remained on file for ten days and no advance bid has been made and’ no objection offered to said sale: and that in said report Said Commissioner recommended that the said sale be confirmed: and it further appearing 2 the Court from said report and from proof offered that said price is fair and adequate ang that it is for the best interest of all parties that said sale be “onfirmed, and that Said land be conveyed to Frank Deaton, or his assignee, the lst and highest bidder, and said Commissioner recommends that said sale be confirmed; : It is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said sale be ang the sane \ Tiz 4 i hereby in all respects approved and confirmed and that said Commissioner be and be That the defendant Iredell County accepted service of summons within the time : is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the purchaser g 8004 af equired by law, to-wit on the 25th day of August, 1954; that the defendants Jim sufficient deed for said land upon the receipt by him of said purchase Prices ang i caither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their children, if any, their heirs-at-law and that the funds so received by him will pay over to the City of Statesville, in full Ne assignees, if any, and all other persons claiming any interest hn the lands described ie and complete satisfaction and pavment of all the taxes, street assessments, and lime in the Complaint, have been served by publication in the manner and within the time due the City of Statesville, plaintiff, in the amount of $60.83, and that the sai BF cequired by law. Commissioner then pay to the County of Iredell, defendant, any and all taxes due be ” said County in the amount of $62.75, in full satisfaction and discharge of the 3 That the time prescribed by law during which the defendants might appear and ‘q County of Iredell against said property, and that said Commissioner pay all the 3 plead to the plaintiff's Complaint has expired, and the defendants and either or all i | cost of said proceeding, including Commissioner's fee, in the amount of 5% of the of them, except Iredell County, have not appeared or pleaded in any manner to the ’ total purchase price, or $8.75, and the balance of said purchase price after the H plaintiff's Complaint, and the time prescribed by law during which any person having a . payment of the amounts heretofore set forth be paid to the Clerk of the Superior : an interest in the subject matter of this action that might appear and set up his, 4 i | Court, to be held as by law provided. Sher, or their claim has expired, and no such person has appeared or set up or 1 This 13 day of December, 195), sil any such claim, except Iredell County, one of the defendants herein. : C._G. Smith ; v aR i “Clerk of the sats ei That the defendant Iredell County filed its answer to the plaintiff's Complaint aie i . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT By adnitting all the allegations set ovt in the plaintiff's Complaint and setting up ‘i 3 Hi » nits said answer a claim for taxes due to Iredell County by the defendants except ch at aaa — | Iredell County against the property described in the Compalint in the total sum of wi | Plaintiff | i | p $1.61, said Answer having been filed on the 15th day of October, 1951. Jim Gaither and wife, Carletto Gaither, their children, if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, if any, and all other persons VI { f ; pe September, 1942. claiming any interest in the lands t ' { JUDGMENT li ate This action was not commenced prior to six months after the lith day of described in the Complaint, and The Court at said hearing upon the verified Complaint filed by the plaintiff Iredell County, North Carolina, and the verified Answer filed by the defendant, Iredell County, finds the following facts; THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable 0 4 Smith, Clerk of the Defendants (a) A tax sale certificate for 1941 City of Statesville taxes lieted in the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, on this th 26th day of October, 195), pn’ of Jim Gaither against real estate hereinafter described fully, was issued to At said hearing it aii : the plaintiff on the lith day of September, 1942, by the tax collector of the City ; .s eared to the Court : a of Statesville after said tax collector had advertised said real estate and had sold I Said real estate and had so aid rea a r x he time and in f sold sai 1 estate for said taxes at the A duly verified Complaint was filed by the Plaintiff in the office of the Cl of the Superior Court of Iredel] c ihe manner provided by law, plaintiff being the highest bidder for said real estate , ounty, on the 25th day of August, 1954. tt Said sale, said taxes were dul d larly assessed and levied , r uly and regu ¥ . II Summons as to all the defendants (b) Plaintiff is the holder of said tax sale certificate and there is due and was issued by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel} County on the 25th dav Pad thereon the sum of $2 of August, 195), | +68, with penalty on said sum at the rate of 6% per annum from and after the lath Gay of September, 1942 until paid. ” if be and he is hereby appointed a Commissioner 6 (c) That the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff for Subsequent tare, (4) That Re A. Hedrick levied by the plaintiff against the defendants" property and said "axes, inclutin forthwith sell the above-described real estate, and the said R. A. t to fo : his Cour interest and penalties, advertising and costs less the 1941 taxes total $57.98, t b| 2 at public hereby directed to sell said real estate a (d) That the defendants and each of them are indebted to the Plaintire for Hedrick, as Commissioner is he y taxes from 1941 through 1953 in the sum of $60.66 f said sale shall which taxes were duly and rhea ll ction for cash to the last and highest bidder, after notice o ah au e ] ~ - f 3 S have been he Statesville Record and Landmark once a NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed: days and shall have been published in t (1) That the plaintiff have ard recover of the defendants County, the sum of $60.66 for taxes d from the last and » weeks, and he shall require of an » except Irede}) week for four consecutive w : , includng interests, penalties, and costs, for the years 1941 through 1953 includisve: bidder at such sale a cash deposit in the amount of 10% of the total bid, | highest ” Court, the said R. A. Hedrick, and that the defendants Jim Gaither and vit, . and after the confirmation of said sale by the n ” execute a deed conveying Carletto Gaither, their children > commissioner, shall upon payment of the purchase price, . if any, their heirs-at-law and assignees, if any, and all other persons claiming any interest in the lands described in the except Iredell County, Comp}, ©) to the purchaser the real estate hereinabove described, in fee simple, and the OmpLaint, = to s follows: pay the costs of this action said R. A. Hedrick, Commissioner, shall apply the proceeds of said sale a (a) for plaintiff's attorney to be hereafter fixed by the Court, and including a fee includng a reasonable fee for S attorney, the same to be hereafter fixed by the Court: that all penalties, costs ne ae Said sume > gz a » and fees constitute a first lien upon certain real estate describe: Sar se as follows: Bi for the defendants attorney in the sum of$3.00, and including commis All of Lots 7 and 8 in Block C in the North Statesville addition to Statesvill: - him, and the costs of advertising and selling the aforesaid property. (>) and the defendant, Iredell County, the amounts awarded in this Judgment by way of North Carolina, said lots being 60 by 150 ft. more fully described in plat on file in the office of the Register of Deeds for Ir He shall next pay the amounts due the plaintiff, City of Statesville, oe edell County, North Carolina. (This a property being deeded to Jim . 7 icularly to the Registry. p be paid in accordance with the directions of this Court and particu y Excepted from the above-described four lots in a portion of lots 7 and 8 r h shall © person or persons entitled to receive said balance, or any part thereof, whic conveyed by : 7 h and wife, Carlet to Gaither to Exy Cc ford by deed dated Ee be paid into the Clerk of the Superior Court of tr edell Cou y y » ri] 1 : ; Z i T Cc 11 f 1] oO wit n three Said tract being a part of No. days following said sale giving the full particulars thereof. 7 and 8 in Block C in the North Statesville Land Company, ithin This lot is 30 ft. wide (4) The Commissioner shall give a full and final report to the Court w by 150 ft. long. (2) Gaither and wife, five days after delivery of the deed to the purchaser showing delivery of same, m eceipt cf the purchase price, and thedisbursements of the proceeds, accompanied Carletto Gaither, their children, if any, their heirs-at-law ant i by receipts evidencing all such disbursements. ° assignees, if any, and all Other persons Claiming any interest i the lands describe he full sum of $61.61 for taxes, for the years 1941 throu pay the costs of this action, This the 26 day of October, 195. os including interests, penalties, sh 1953 inclusive: as aforesaid, for the defendant Iredell County; C. G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court. and costs, and that the said defendants eee K KK KK KKK KK KK KK K including a fee of $3.00 for the attom that all said sums and fees constitute a first lien upon (3) That this Judement be decla inabove described » interests, penalties, 0st the real estate described above. red a first lien upon the real estate here title have had or may have j » and Superior to any f interest n that any ° the defendants have, ; > Claim, or lis 1 nor to said property, except Iredel County as aforesaid, property, P ANNO. 5854 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR court R. & J. Discount Company Plaintiff a JUDGMENT L. G. Hardwick Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before Hon. C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon Motion by the Plaintiff fo Judgment against the defendant L. G. Harwick by default final: And it appearing to the Court that a Summons was issued in this 2lst day of September, 1954, and that a copy of said Summons and copy of Applica- tion for Extention of Time to File Complaint, action, and copy of Order Extending the Time for Filing Complaint to the 9th day of October, 1954, were served on the defendant L. G, Hardwick on the 5th day of October, 1954, in lieu of Complaint: And it further appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed m the 9th day of October, 1951, and that a copy of Order for Service of Complaint duly issued on the 9th day of October, 1951, served on defendant L,. G. » with copy of verified Complaint were Hardwick on the 2lst day of October, 195k: And it further appearing to the Court that no Answer s Demurrer, or other leadi j pleading have been filed by the defendant L, G. Hardwick, and no extention of tir et tof i: ile pleading has been Sranted, and that the time in which pleadings may be filed has expired: Now, th it is ' erefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of defendant L, G. Hardwick the sum of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY AND 10.100 ($150.10) with i nterest thereon from May 10, 1954, and the costs of this action This lst day of December, 1954. C G, Smith Clerk Superior Court ‘S866 ¢ ¢.&e% eee we em Showing the nature and purpose of thee 15859 fmt CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT S ipsDeLL COUNTY id action on the : ee bee rat VS Cc, 0. Sudderth, uae Ge MEETS, oe | rh Sudderth's Tire & Battery Service, a tiffs Fr Plein JUDGMENT —— eee ee R. Benfield, | wa Statesville Beverage Co., Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, and being heard before Honorable C. G. h. Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it , Individually, and Effie Steele, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Cl erk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this of November , 1954, day on motion of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiffs, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: ie Ae That on September 28, 1954, the plaintiffs filed a duly verified complaint in the ab Ove entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. snit iy . appearing to the Court from the sttement of the attorney for the plaintiffs and + @ the defendant that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between i the parties and that the plaintiffs have elected to take a non-suit in their action; y IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiffs be : BS non-suited and be taxed with the costs as charged by the Court. a This the 25th day of October, 1951. Clerk of the Superior Court 4 PF) Consented to: iW Mas at Baxter H. Finch ae i Attorney for the Plaintiffs eek Ree KH KKK KK KK X ! ees 45861 # ® NORTH CAROLINA, ne ‘G In the Superior Court aoe Iredell County. Before the Clerk i. F. Beaver and H. D. Fowler, t Individually, { H i Plaintiffs, Stamey Steele o; ) FINAL JUDGMENT i { i 445878 CAROLINA That summons was issued from this Court on September 28, 1954, to the NORTH Sh IN THE SUPERIOR COURT eritt IREDELL COUNTY of tredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. ' my, 8 Sherrill, Sr. ss vs ) JUDGMENT That summons was served on the defendant Effie Steele on October 3, 1954 ani i, Blake Morrison ) on the defendant Stamey Steele on October 5, 1954, by Bunch Redmond, Deputy Sheri This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the November 1954 term of Iredell Countv, bv leaving with the defendants a copy of the Summons, together Da of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. C. Rudisill, Judge with a copy of the complaint. i Presiding, and after a consideration of the record, argument of counsel, and Agreed a : Statement of Facts, the Court is of the opinion and so rules as follows: That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allows That the defendant is not indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three Hundred by law for the defendants to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pe . a SDollars for the alleged breach of the option contract, and wreement entered into on pleading or motion has been filed by the defendants. Z Mithe 15th day of July, 1954, and extended by agreement of the parties. The Court « 5 « MP further rules that the defendant, H. Blake Morrison, is the owner in fee simple of That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiffs demands a sum certain in fe Mthe lands referred to in paragraph 3 of the complaint and described in the option money due for value received, on a certain promissory note - Wader o00l Bagreement attached to the Complaint and marked Plaintiff's Exhibit "A", as the Court date of August 1, 1954, due and payable on September 2, 1954, executed and delivers : adjudges that the defendant was conveyed a fee simple title to the said 88 acres. to the plaintiffs by the defendants, for a certain sum therefor: that this note was ae The Court further adjudges that the defendant's predecessor in title, Mrs. Mary Lou set out in and was made a part of the complaint. BS tents, owned a life estate in the said real property by devise from her father, ad wipes Be Leroy Morrow; that she acquired 3/h undivided remainder interest bv deed from three That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint that the defendants ar of the remaindermen who had acquired fee simple remainder interest in said real now due the plaintiffs, | for value received on a certain promissory note, the sum of property by devise of Leroy Morrow: that George H. Lentz was conveyed the remaining Two Hundred Nynety-Three Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($293.17), together with inter# thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from maturity, Sept. 2, 195k, until paid. a) remainder interest by the owner of the other remainder interest under the will 2 of Leroy Morrow: and that George H. Lentz under Hs will by his will, dated June ll, 51937, devised hi i ty in fee simple to IT Is, THEREFORE, s t remainder interest in the said real property Pp CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJ his widow, Mary Lou Lent ’ 7 u nt?2. JUDGED AND DECREED that the piaintiff recover of the defendants » Stamey Steele and Effie Steele, the sum of Two Hundred Upon motion of the defendant, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Ninety-Three Dollars. and Seventeen Cents ($293.17) together with interest thereon Mplaintire have and recover nothing from the defendant, and that the plaintiff pay at the rate of six per cent per annum from maturity, Sept. | 2, 1954, until paid, the costs of this acti on as taxed by the Clerk. together with the costs of this action taxed by the Court y T . w E46 ewsinar itt, 108. his 27 day of November, 1954. J. C,. Rudisill Judge Presiding Ce CG. Smi LJ +f Clerk of Superior Court of iredell (om eR KR KK KR RR Rk ke eK OK & PERS. Ohm gone eeue ae eg st further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that the 445888 And it c< Carolina } In the Superior Court Tredell C tv | Before the Clerk on consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a Sum of rede ounty rk. R. & J. Discourt Company fixed by the contract, to wit: the sum of TWO HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE AND e ° u 1 Vo ey $ 53 on Plaintiff m ($239 "6) Dollars with interest thereon from the 25th day of August, 1954, 76/100 efO P until paid at the rate of six (6) Per cent; W. P. Church { vs } JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT | j Defendant } And it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that the n a : sion of one 1948 Oldsmobile automobile This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Cty — Bplaintiff claims the right to the posses ' : : j 96 ader that it may sell the same as provide of the Superior Court of Iredell Countv, and it appearing to the Court from the Ra cotor #9/2026-LH, serial # 98W3L96, in j ecuted by the defendant on August 25, 1954, in statements of Scott, Collier & Nash, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, that the matters certain chattel mortgage ex y Daina 5 . ~ 676, Guilford County Registry and that and things in controversy have been settled between the parties, and that the Mchattel Mortgase Book 541-B, at page 67 , j i intiff caused to be issued claim and del.very defendant has paid to the plaintiff the full amount of the note sued on in this Mancillary to this action the plaint ¢ ‘ ? e in its possession; action plus the costs paid by the plaintiff; and that the plaintiff has elected papers for said property and now has sam p j and decreed that the plaintiff have to take a voluntary non-suit in its action; NOW, THEREFORE, It is ordered, adjudged TY-NINE AND 76/100 ($239.76) IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and t and recover of the defendant the sum of TWO HUNDRED THIR i j ( f August, 1954; that the personal hereby non-suited this 29th day of November, 1954. DOLLARS, with interest thereon from the 25th day of Aug h, C, G,. Smith F property above described be sold at public auction, for cash, to the highest bidder 2 ohh . Clerk Superior Court at said sale, after posting notice of said sale as provided in General Statute Consented to: ae 1-339.18, at the office of R. & Jd. Discount Company, 215 North Center Street, Fa R. & J. Discount Company PA statesvile, North Carolina, and to that end M, L. Nash is appointed Commissioner of Scott Collier & Nash, Attorneys a Bathe Court and directed to sell the same as hereinabove provided, and credit the B L. M. Nas = y ash Pmanount received therefor, less the legal cost of said sale, upon the monetary KKK KEK KK KK KR KK K K Oy judgment: herein rendered; and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the cost “5890 e , Grace, o eoeeee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT > at hie getsee: BEFORE THE CLERK This 17 day of December, 1954. R. & J. Discount Company : Cc. G. Smith vs JUDGMENT see028 Be eee 82% * Margaret Lindsay Defendant : acer Be NORTH CAROLINA, This cause coming on In the Superior Court to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of HB ieeveu. county. Before the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, upon Motion by the plaintiff for Judgment against Charlotte Casket Compan the defendant by default final: pany, ici , Plaintiff, ppearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed and Summers issued in this actinn on the 11 i FINAL JUDGMENT : © > i PSN AS Sm h day of November, 1954: rs B. Reavis, trading and doing And it f usiness urther appearing to the Court that the said Summons, together with? § as Reavis Funeral Home, . , copy of said Complaint, Ny : were served on the defendant on the 13th day of November, © nd M it further appearing to the Court that no Answer pleading has been filed by the defendant has been granted ; i Vs. { , { Defendant. Demurrer, or other : Cl THis cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, eee f and no extension of time to file pleadis# i of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 20th day © » and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expire rember, 1954, on motion of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, fo " judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: sae io CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT That on November 12, 1954, the plaintiffs filed a duly verified complaint / Pe nEDELL COUNTY the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Irede}} County , Incorporated ) Epriendly Loan Service, One iatiff, ) a JUDGMENT That summons was issued from this Court on Nevember 12, 1951, to the Shenn , Vs. ) 4 B. Burnham i of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. pmEdwin M, Burnham and eee” { nie | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C. G, ‘i That summons was served on the defendant, C. B. Reavis » on November 16 } a erior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Ky » 195, mith, the Clerk of the Sup : by Robert Kinder, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, by leaving with the defendant rt from the statement of counsel for the plaintiff that the matters and things i paecou a copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. , . ' tan Sijn controversy have been settled between the parties, and that the plaintiff has ee ee 4 elected to take a nonsuit in its action; and it further appearing to the court that That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time aligeemm Mean ancillary proceeding in attachment was filed by the plaintiff in conjunction with by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other fee this action and that the Sheriff, pursuant to an order of attachment herein granted, pleading or motion has been filed by the defendants. cid levy upon the property of the defendants: and it further appearing to the court Se ~ that the plaintiff has no further claim against the defendants and that the defendants' pi aeamice ee ee oe plaintiff demands a sum certain i property should be released from the aforesaid levy; and it further appearing to the money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract [im court thet. the time: fom: answering the plaintiff's coeplaint has not expired and that and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor: that an itemized ithe defendants have no attorney of record: verified Statement, marked "Exhibit A™, 3 was attached to, and made a part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase IT IS, "4HEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff be nonsuited Band be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk: and it is further ordered » and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits that the levy previously made and presently in force against the property of the arising out of the transaction, defendants be lifted and released by the Sheriff. ‘ re fe ; That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint Statement attached to the complaint This 16th day of December, 195k. and the itemized verifi Cc. ge Smith ——_____ Clerk of the Superior Cour » and marked "Exhibit A", that the defendant is now due the plaintiff sented to: Fred Chamblee ' Ittorney for the Plaintiff? Ke RK RK KR KK KK OK OK RK KK » OM account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shm in the plaintiff's Statement marked "Exhibita" » the sum of Ope Thousand Bight Hundred Thirty-Seven Dolbrs and Forty-Four Cents ($1,837.44), together with interté! thereon at the rate of Six per cent Per annum from July 29, 1954, until paid. TT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaisti! recov er of the defendant, c, 8, Reavis, trading and doing business as Reavis Punt Home, the sum of One Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty- m ($1,837.44), together with interest thereon fom July 29, 1951, Seven Dollars and Forty-Fou at the rate of six per cent per anu until paid, together with costs of this action taxed by the ™ This the 20th day of December, 1954, G t tf erk of Superior Court of irede * 198 Reece RE emi pene IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘oRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT yonTd CAROLINA BEFORE THE CLERK IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK IREDELL COUNTY x Long and wife, Julia 4 on oe and Motors Insurance Corporation, Plaintiffs, Sam Knox Long and wife, Julia Ann Long, and Motors Insurance : a JUDGMENT or ’ PF rs, Plaintitts CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT vs vs HH HHH HHH Eanes Glenn Elliott, James Glenn Elliott, Defendant, Defendant, HHH HHH HH OH a I, James Glenn Elliott, the above named defendant, do hereby confess judgney be Midecreed that the plaintiffs have and recover of the defendant the sum of Five in favor of Sam Knox Long and wife, Julia Ann Long and Motors Insurance Corporitiopim Upon the foregoing confession of judgment, it is now ordered, adjudged and Hundred Fifty-three and 30/100 ($553.30) Dollars with interest thereon from maturity the plaintiffs herein, in the sum of Five Hundred Fifty-three and 30/100 ($553.39 Maat the rate of six per cent per annum, together with the costs in the sum of $3.00; Dollars, with interest therecn from maturity and authorize the interest for jniname it appearing from statement of the plaintiffs that One Hundred Three and 30/100 therefor, One Hundred Three and 30/100 ($103.30) Dollars has been paid this date fa ($103.30) Dollars has been paid to Sam Knox Long and wife, Julia Ann Long on this and the balance of Four Hundred Fifty and No/100 ($450.00) Dollars shall be patil ~ Peajudgment. It is ordered that the balance of Fourt Hundred Fifty @450.00) Dollars to Motors Insurance Corporation at the rate of Twenty and No/100 ($20.00) Dollars Ram ‘ “ lye paid to Motors Insurance Corporation, 1316 Johnston Building, Charlotte, North per month on the fifteenth day of each and every calendar month, commencing with FF iy ea 3 arolina, at the rate of Twenty ($20.00) Dollars per month commencing on the 15th the fifteenth day of January for a total of twenty-one payments and a final paver meay of January, 1955 and on the 15th day of each and every calendar month hereinafter of Thirty and No/100 ($30.00) Dollars, or until the entire amount of Four Hundre ie ; me or a total of Twenty-one installments and a final installment of Thirty ($30.00) Fifty and No/100 ($450.00) Dollars is paid, mollars, This confession of judgment represents damages sustained by Sam Knox Lon Fe This thelOth day of December, 1954. wife, Julia Ann Long arising out of an automobile accident involving an automobile ie F C. G. Smith owned by Sam Kgox Long and an automobile owned by the defendant, which accident Clerk Superior Court occurred at the intersection of Hickory Highway and Park Drive, in the City of [gry Consent of: Statesville, North Carolina, on the léth day of October, 1954, said damages beitt iim tors Insurance Corporation paid by the plaintiff, Motors Insurance Corporation, and the said Sam Knox Lon eae’ Re Ms Simpson , Staff Adjuster having subrogated his rights to the plaintiff, Sam Knox Long 2 5 James Glenn Ell i ae ua Sworn to and subscribed before me, Julia Ann Cong, Plainti?Ts this the 10th day of December, 195k. ee KK KK eK Kk kK Ke OK OK OK K Nance King Pearson Notary Public My commission expires: September 22, 1956 + 2 #5893 North Carolina | In the Superior 1 Iredell County | n Carolina ell County In the Superior Court Before the Clerk. R. & J. Discount Company Plaintiff J, Discount Company Plaintiff JUDMENT OF NON-SUIT ) vs JUDGMENT Alvin Griffin | : } i : | f b ! Defendant E, Hamby sitensek This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, cafe This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the Plaintiff for juipnul x of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from 0 nen statements of Scott, Collier & Nash, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, that the And it appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed an | rs and things in controversy have been settled between the parties, and that é o summons issued in this action on the llth day of November, 1954; defendant has paid to the plaintiff the full amount of thenote sued on in this And it further appearing to the Court that the said summons, together fi on plus the costs paid by the palintiff; and that the plaintiff has elected to with a copy of said Complai nt, were served on the defendant on the 19th day of pa voluntary non-suit in its action; November, 1954: IT IS, THEREFORE, Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and And it further appearine to the Court that ho answer, demurrer, or ote . Mis hereby non-suited this 28th day of December, 1954. pleadings have teen filed by the def endant., and no extension of time to file Pleadings has been o¢ d ; C, G. Smith . . 1 granted, and that the time within which pleadings may be file Clerk Superior Court has expired; sented to’ And itt further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint tht BM 5, piscount Company the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sim of money fixed by the contract, 78/100 ($139.78) t, Collier & Nash, Attorneys to wit, the sum of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE AND s : M..L, Nasi DOLLARS, with interest thereon from the lith day of November, ase 1954, until paid at the rate of six Per cent: ee ee eta e a , And it further i C | : | appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint th Film Carolina } In the Superior Court the plaintiff claims the right to th dell County | Before the Clerk. vo the possession of one 1947 Chevrolet automobill, motor #EAA-102329, iii RB J. Discount Compan vwee GheG'-4t-ayeekd the game an provided in certain i Plaintift chattel mortgages executed by the de ats ees Donald Cothern Defendant r ' ‘endant on April 3, 1954, and June 30, 29h, vs { JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT } i ! co 2 gsc This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned have and recover of the defendant the sum ($139.78) DOLLARS? adjudged and decreed that the plaintit of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE AND 76/10 ; with int m Statements of f, that the interest thereon from the ith ion as November, 195h # of Scott, Collier & Nash, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, rk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the cost of this ac 3 7 t $ 2 tion; that the Personal Property "6 and things in controversy fiave been settled between the parties, and that above described be sold # » for cash, to public auction def the highest bidder at said sale. after posting noti# *rendant has paid to the plaintiff the full amount of the note sued on in , ‘action plus the costs paid b h laintiff; and that the plaintiff has » at the office of R. & Pp y the plain : ) Cted to take a volu ntar ~ . , North C&rolina, and t : y non-suit in its action; im. THEREFORE, Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be it is hereby non-suited this 23rd day of December, 19514. “8 G, mk erk Superior Court Sented to: &, J+ Discount Company a sh eee KK eee KK He KK de a i No. 5882 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK it is forther ordered that the said Commissioner report his transactions in t tter to this Court upon the completion of the said sale as the law requires. is ma this the 23rd day of December, 1954. Franklin Savings Bank of the City of Boston and R. A. Collier, Trustee Plaintiffs C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SALE vs Dock F. Mitchell and Wife, Shula Mitchell Defendants kK eK KR ROKK KK KK KR RK Ke Ok ee 00 ©© ef 2% © o8 8¢ m 5889 he th Carolina | In the Superior Court or This cause, coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor Carl G. Smith, MBMredell County | Before the Clerk. Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this the 23rd day ifm, & J. Discount Company, t Plaintiff es December, 195h3 5 4 JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT vs { And it appearing to the Court that this action was commenced for the foreclosuy and sale of the property belonging ee Anderson j to the defendants and described in Paragraph X of Defendant of the Complaint; and it further appearing to the Court that the Defendant Dock F, Mitchell was served with copy of the Summons, 30, 1954 This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk together with the Complaint, on October Mm the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the » and filed Answer to said Complaint through his attorney, Boyce G. Gibson, #, ’ on November 22, 1954, and that the defendant, mtatements of Scott, Collier & Nash, Attornevs for the Plaintiff, that the matters and Shula Mitchell, was served with a copy Maatings in controversy have been settled between the parties, and that the defendant of the Summons, together with a copy of the Complaint, on October 31, 1954, and has as paid to the plaintiff the full amount of the note sued on in this action plus filed no Answer or other Pleadings to-the same, and that the time has now expired for he costs paid by the plaintiff; and that the plaintiff has elected to take a the filing of pleadings by said defendant: cluntary non--suit in itsaction; And it further appearing to the Court that in this action the plaintiffs prayed IT IS, THEREFORE, Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and it is - that the land described in the Complaint he sold at public auction and that a Comnissi fereby non-suited this 29th day of November, 1954. be appointed hy the Cle rk to sell the said property, and that the proceeds therefron be applied first to the costs of said sale‘and the C. G. Smith balance to be applied to the Clerk Superior Court indebtedness due on forth in the said Complaint; the note as set me nsented to; And the Court finding all of the foregoing facts to be true, it is, therefore, ‘£ J, Discount Company ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the lands described in paragraph I o! Cott, Collier & Nash, Attorneys the Complaint herein be sold at Public auction > M. 1, Nash and to that end, M. L. Nash is ap- fe Lee Anderson t the courthouse door, Statesville, ee RK RK KK KR Kk Ke KR Re OK afte ’ r due advertisement of thessaid sale as provided by law, and repo North Carolina he la i St and highest bid made for the land at the said sale, and after he 10-d i i “y period for increased bids and upon confirmation of the saié Complaint herein, and Out of the said the costs of this action; ret i ; ain to his own use as commissions five per cent of : Pay any taxes and specific liens o purchase price the Commissioner is first to purchase Price, the remanider of f record against the said land, art the said purchase Price to beca the Pplied due on note set forth in the said Compalint P to the indebtedness 4A 5891 24 lh ) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT pbs BEFORE THE CLERK. North Carolina |} In the Superior Court, Iredell County | DLL COUNTY. R. & J. Discount Company { baaeeas ' ranrans tt a jie Winters Implement pany, i vs JUDGMENT Bporporation, Plaintiff, CONSENT JUDGMENT ’ CONSENT Earl Reep ' Vs. Defendant i :, B ,. clodfelter, This cause coming on to be heard before the HOnorable C, G, Smith, Clerk of Defendant. S i Court of Iredell the undersigned Clerk of Superior the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment This cause being heard before And it appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed and sum . - sa e , : 17. 1954; that on the same date the plaintiff filed a duly verified affidavit Ons emb er g 4 > And it further appearing to the Court that the said summons, i 1 property together with he plaintiff a note and Chattel Morteare conveying to it certain personal prop a the p copy of said Complaint, were served on the defendant on the 23rd day of November, 1% sisting 3 A rr ing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or other d : ure the payment of the note an #415) Disk Plow, one McCormick A I44 Cultivator, to sec pleadingghave been filed by the defendant ) cf Two Hundred » and no extension of time to file Pleadimiiiebedness Owed to the Plaintiff, upon which there is an unpaid balance ‘i interest; that the plaintiff has been granted, and that the time within which pleadinss may be filed has expire: Mid Nine Dollars and Tn Cents ($209.10), together with . And it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that the express contract to pay 4 sum of money to wit, the sum of SIXTY-THREE AND 25/100 ($63.25) DOLLARS with interest thereon from the 13th day of June, sribed rected the Sheriff of Iredell County to take from the defendant the property desc fixed by the contract, j r iff: t at the time the Sheriff o Mm the Chattel Mortzage, and deliver it to the plaintiff; tha ised him that he 1954, until paid at the rate of edell County served the summons and order on the defendant and advi Six per cent; i and the Fuld have to repossess the personal property described in the Chattel Mortgage And it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that the Plaintiff claims the right to the Possession of one motor # P12 280235, i idertaking aintiff's affidavit, or the defendant could execute a good and sufficient un ty could be retained 1941 Plymouth four door Sedat, m equired by law, and if such undertaking was executed, the property serial #952084 ~4,, in order that it may sell the same as provide in a certain chattel mort full the the defendant; that at this time the defendant expresses a disire to my in Sage executed by the defendant on April 13, 1954, and thit ; t cunt of Two Hundred and Nine Dollars and Ten Cents ($209.10) togd@her with mteres ancillary to this actin t : 7 1d all Court he plaintirr caused to be issued claim and delivery papers Bi oreoy in the amount of Twenty Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($20.37). an for said Property and now has same in its Possession, NOW, THEREFORE, s t the ‘8, which sums represent the total indebtedness he ownes the plaintiff; tha IT Is Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have recover of the defendant the sum Of SIXTY-THREE AND 25/100 ($63.25) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from the 13+} day of June. , Property above described b highest bidder at Said sale t mendant further expressed a desire to pay the indebtedness in full and all costs d to have " etain the personal Property described in the plaintiff's Gattel Mortgage, an 1954, and th s action} hat fff to take a ’ bhe cost of thi 3 that Chatte) Mortgage cancelled of record, and to permit the plainti the personal © sold at public auction, for cash, to the Suit in this action; t that both parties have expressed a desire that this judgmen » after posting notice of said sale as provided in Gene » at the office of R. & J, Disco North C,rolina, and to that end M, L. Nash is appointed Commissioner of the Court and directed t a Operate as a h j a h rty from mainta ining ul complete accord and satisfaction arr ng eac pa Ytatute 1-339, la ther action of any kind fendants unt Company, 215 North Center Strét Statesville, e whatsoever lased upon the facts rerein stated or upon th in b t ] f . j n ry 211 the Same as her einabove provided and credit the ved therefor, t in ceeding of elaim and delivery; that the plaintiff desires to accept the paymen less the legal cost of Said sale, upon the monetary {2% herein rendered, d * of the defendant's indebtedness in the amount of Two Hundred and Nine Dollars an n Cents ($209.10) , This 30 day of December, 1954, 20.37) and interest thereon of Twenty Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents (¢ "ll Court costs, and to oe the defendant, Clerk Sastet of Roart +k ek & & g ‘ek hk me & xk ue me m ent submit te a nonsuit in this action subject to the cons NOW, THEREFORE, PY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff's cause of action and the ancillary remedy of clain ay delivery be, and the same is, hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that the Plaintisy ;, forever barred from instituting or maintaining another-action based UPON the inded owed it by the defendant. 5 2. That the defendant be, and he is hereby forever barred from instituting o maintaining any action against the plaintiff for its failure to file its complaint in this action or to further pursue its cause of action in this litigation, 3. That the defendant be taxed with the cost by the Clerk of Court, Signed and entered the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell ty in Statesville, North Carolina, on Decemher 3h, i95%s C, G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Trek] County. Consented to: C, H. Dearman C. H. Dearman of the Firm of Adams, Dearman, and Winherry, Attorneys for Plaintiff, QO. A. Clodfelter Defendant ee OK Ke ke kk me v# 576, TORTH CAROT Tiras NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Industrial Bank of Statesville, Inc, JUDGMENT.OF NON-SUJU!I! Mrs. Ruth G, Lackey and husband, Cecil w, Lackey ) ) ) VS. ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard before the Hon orable C. G, Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statenel of the counsel for the plaintirr ¢ hat the matters and things in controversy have “ agreed upon and settled, and that the Plainitff has acreed to take a non-suit a9 i ° his cause of action, and that the defendant has not filed answer. No : it j W, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintif! be non-suited 88 to his cause of actiog ’ and that the plaintiff be taxed with the costs. me the defendant th 5881 RTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PoRDELL COUNTY By Beam, eintiff, JUDGMENT vs 0, Johnson, & Fred Defendant, * his cause coming on © be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of This Ge i ‘or Court of Iredell County, upon Motion by the plaintiff for judgment azainst Superior ° : he defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed and Summons n nS issued in this action on the 23rd day of October, 1954; And it appearing to the Court that the said Summons together with a copy of y of October, 1954; said Complaint was served on the defendant on the 23rd day o er, 43 JOU! Demurr t! leading And it further appearing to the Court that no Answer, Demurrer, or cther pl ees : . = in Bhas been filed by the defendant, and that the time within which pleadings may be filed mhas expired; And it further apppearineg to the Court from the verified Complaint that the cause nm - ixe ff action consists of the breach of an express ccntract to pay a sum of money fixed t >) de rp", f) \ by the contract, to-wit: the sum of Seventeen hundred seventy and No/100 ($1770.00) tp bo 1S wae ate gcllars, with interest thereon from the 3.5 day of April, 1953, until paid at the ra of six per cent: And it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that the ee P ‘“ . F Yr n F pPaintiff claims the right to the possession of one 1950 Model Ford Deluxe Fordor automobile, Motor No, BONR-141390, in order that he may sell the same as provided in : <) - in , g ‘tain chattel mortgage executed by the defendant on April 29th, 1952, in Chattel “ortgaze Book #185, at pace 587, Iredell County Registry, and that ancillary to this m°ction the plaintiff caused to be issued claim and delivery papers for said property s2nd now has same in his possession; OW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and “cover f the defendant the sum of Seventeen hundred seventy and No/100 (§1770.00) Dcllars, with interest thereon from the 15 day of April, 1953; that the personal Property above described be sold at public auction, for cash, to the highest bidder * Said sale, after postingrnotice of said sale as provided in General Statute 1339.18, at the court house in Statesville, North Carolina, and to that end W, R. “attley ig “ppointed Commissioner of the Court and directed to sell the same as herein- ‘ove provided, and credit the amount received therefor, less the legal cost of said ‘S's Upon the monetary judgment herein rendered; and that the plaintiff recover of © cost of this action. , * his @th day of January, 1955, Ge Smith C qo A OCLC erk © uperior ourt ee te ee a, ey ee a ae ae oe ate a State of North Carolina Department of Archives and History Raleigh CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY This is to certify that the microphotographs appearing on this reel are true and accurate reproductions of the records listed on the target (title) sheet preceding each volume or series of records microfilmed hereon; that the records were microfilmed on the date and at the reduc- tion ratio indicated; and that on the date of microfilming, the records were in the custody of the official or other individual listed on the target sheet(s). It is further certified that the records listed on the aforesaid target sheet(s) were microfilmed in conformity with the provisions of Sections 845.1 = 845.4, General Statutes of North Carolina; and that in order to insure archival quality and authentic reproduction of records filmed, they were microfilmed in the manner prescribed,and with equipment and film approved, by the State Department of Archives and History. —<s — & _ ( Signed) J Camera Operator