Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1953
hw geen a cmeene Ter aee ine ms ree, 3 Pee PRs EN an = a i lI lg I ct ain Nala incat pacers SS a ae oe ~ No. 5399 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT IREDELL COUNTY H & B Company of Statesville Inc. { vs | JUDGMENT NON-SUIT N. K. Sprinkle j This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable ©. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Vourt from a statement of the Attorney for the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff desires to take a non-wuit in this action; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the costs. This the 9th day of January, 1953. Uv, G, Smith Ulerk Superior Vourt Iredell vounty, . C. mom OK \No. 5355 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Bb. H. Gillespie vs JUDGMENT NON-SUIT Yoseph £. Holley & Roy F, Singer This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable LU. G. Smith, Ulerk of Superior Court ot Iredell vounty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the vourt from a statenent of the Attorney for the Plaintiff that tne Plaintiff desires to take a non-suit in this action; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the costs, this tne 15th day oi January, 1953. GU, G, Smith ; — Ulerk Superior Vourt Iredell Vounty, ".- Consented to: Grant solmer Attorney for the Plaintiff RR ROR RK OK ek ok ee CC aaa —_ —— Mo. 5402 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR VOURT. coUNTY OF IREDELL. Docket No. 5403 t McGhee Margarey plaintiff ovs- PETITION FOR NONSUIT. liam Russell Mc Ghee ™ Defendant Petitioner, Mrs. Margaret McGhee , hereby appears before this Honorable Jourt, and hereby requests that a non suit be taken in this action for divorce which is on file in this Court. Mrs. Margaret lhicGhee Plaintiff- Petitioner. This cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing that plaintiff is now desirous of taking non suit in the above and foregoing action for divorce, it is now, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attomey for plaintiff, asking for anon Order of non suit, = said non suit is now hereby granted. This the 23rd day of January, 1953. C. G, omith Clerk ouperior vourt, Iredell County, North 6arolina. kak KK KK OK OK OK KK OK OK KR Sion achat adienshtiennnt gehen e-acTo > aa i Tita a tn Se a RE ee RT = = = See ee ~— mows IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Monday, January 26th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun amd held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 26th day of January, 1953, at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. when and where His Honor Zeb V, Nettles, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, 1953, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J. ©, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and opened Court by order of the Court. J. C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court the the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for the January Term, 1953, First Week, to-wit: six months period ending June 30th, 1953, to-wit: C. M. Weatherman J. B. Privette Miss Ina Anderson L. W. Raby J. A. vhaffin J. C, Feimster Herman Wallace R, E. Milholland E. A. Readling L,. 8. Hollar, Jr. Nathan Trivette D. F. Shumaker E. T. Feimster Mrs. J. Neely Kincaid Hal R. Sprinkle F. L. Helms C. C. Bustle J. M. Suther R. B. Sherrill Marvin H. McDaniels O. Coite Sloan J. G. Lackey, Sr. ¥., L. McLain H. B. Tolbert Walter Roy Beaver Lillie l.. Reynolds W. M. Wallace C, W. Westmoreland Mrs. Blanche Shaver Rk. T. Brantley Johnnie Haynes David H. Andrews Calvin M. Wooten James H. Gryder L. R. Current Vlaude Cashion and for a Grand Jury to serve fora Lynn M. Barnette J. B. Sipes H, T. Watts Mrs. C. L. Sherrill Albert W. Rogers Clark Templeton J. F, Mason John A, Stroud George ». Westmoreland M. L. Marlow L. C. Plyler Clarence Kissinger Mrs. Lillian Massey Steves W. C. Bell J. Boyce vrown Charles A. Gallyon B, B,. Swann Robert Lazenby Marvin Sigmon appeared for Jury duty as ordered by the Court. J. A. Chaffin, Hal R, Sprinkle, Charles A Gallyon and Robert Lazenby we Herman Wallace, Nathan Trivette, Mrs. ©. L. Sherrill and . L. Marlow were exe used re no revumed by Doctor's certificate, C, C, Bustle had moved to Virginia, J. G, Lackey, Sr. was excused until 2nd week of Court. Calvin M. Wooten and John A, Stroud were deceased. L g. Current had moved to Forsyth County. The following good and lawful men and women were duly drawn and sworn as the Gr Jonnie Haynes vlark Templeton Shoemaker Brantley Hollar, Jr. Swann L. W. Raby was sworn as Mrs. J. Neely Kincaid J. M. Suther F, L. Helms J. B. Sipes Claude Cashion Mrs. Blanche Shaver Foreman of the Grand Jury. and Jury to serve for the six months period ending June 30th, 1953, to-wit: vharles A, Gallyon Ww. MN. Wallace E,. Milholland Ww oe Raby Boyde Brown W. Westmoreland J, B, Yoforth was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. The following were sworn as talesman jurors for the Week. i, &, Smith T, J. Weber flo, 1103 State v8 Guy Ramsey Yo, 1205 otate v8 Nathan Patterson No, 1354 State vs Benjamin J Threatte, Jr. Yo. 1345 State vs "ary Saunders lo, 1403 State _ve ‘lement, P Gaither, Jr No, State vs “Lifforg Charles Hall Yo, 15 Sate” vs Toby Hyde J. P. Patterson L. F. Warren B. N. Sprinkle FALSE PRETENSE Alias Capias to Rowan County BASTARDY Alias Vapias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order. POSSESS LIQUOR Alias Capias. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias. FORGERY Alias Capias LARCENY Alias Capias Wo. 1549 State vs zs William Leroy Smith No. 1572 otate vs Bud Little, alias Marshall Little Wo. 1599 State vs George E Creson No. 1604 State vs Josepn Fulton Woods INo. 1605 State vs G. A. Benfield Wo. 1606 State vs Joseph Fulton Woods No.1616 State vs J. D. Gray Wo. 1633 State vs Homer A Nantz \No. 1644 State vs Troy Fesperman Wo. 1724 State vs L D Wall Wo. 1734 State vs Willard L Dison ‘No. 1757 State vs Arthur Gilbert Jones IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Monday, January 26, 1953 ASSAULT WIiH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias BREAKING & ENTERING Alias Capias ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias ASSAULP WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias ASSAULT ON FEMALE Continued under former order. ABANDON & NON-§UPPORT Nisi Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nis Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Alias Capias DRUNK & DISORDERLY Alias Capias MURDER Continued by consent. cece a CC IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Monday, January 26, 1953 No. 1763 State v8 Guy Richard Elmore Kio. 1764 State v3 Richard Glenn Bowers No. 1774 State vs L. Le (Bill) Lackey No. 1775 State vs Cameron Harrison (Cam) Hayes 4o, 1777 State vs Thad (Bud) Lambert lo, 1799 State v8 Goldie Mae Setzer io, 1800 State vs dalph Wesley Carter No. 1760 State vs “laude Eugene Pitts No, 1660 State vs PW Byers No, 180 State , 8 “lian J Kiker No. 180 State 3 vs i ert Garfield Lawrence, Jr DRIVING DRUNK It appearing to the court that the defendant has been called to the bar of this court and has failed to appear. It is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged that the cash bond of $150.00 be and the same is hereby forfieted and ordered turned over to the school fund. DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the defendant. PERMIT MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR Ow HIS PROPERTY Continued for the Vefendant. MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR Continued for the Defendant. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Nol Pros With Leave. SPEEDING Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. SPEEDING Continued for the Tern. SPEEDING : Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. Instanter Process. ($300.00 vond. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the Term. DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the Term. ae in ce en a arenes Fa a a at pS aE io meen A cn mata eae ES ‘No. 1807 State vs William Glenn surgess Wo. 1808 State vs Louis W McKesson, Jr Wo. 1768 State vs William A. Moore W-73 No. 1794 State vs Frances vampbell U=22 Wo. 1816 State vs ee Monroe Southers IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Monday, January 26, 1953 DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the Term, ! i I I DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the Term, UaIVING DaUNK Defendant through his attorney, R. A, Collier enters a plea of Guilty. ; Judgment of tue Court is that the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the costs and surrender his driver's license to be transmitted to the Puolic Safety Division at Raleigh, for the purpose of having his license revoked as required by law, 1720 Boulevard, Statesville, 4. U. LN-74969,. LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled. Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and empanelled. - Defendant withdraws his plea of Not Guilty and enters a plea of Guilty of wilful abandonment and Non-Support of his four (4) minor children. Judgment of the court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Eighteen (18) Months and be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a term of Five (5) Years on the following expressed conditions: 1. That the defeniant will remove himself outside the corporate limits of the vity of 1h Statesville or the Town of Mooresville immediate’s 2. That he will not indulge in the use of intoxicating liquors, wine or beer; 3. That he will pay into the office of the Superintendent of Welfare of Iredell County ire the use and benefit of his four () ainer eS the sum of $40.00 per month. The first paymen be made on or before the lst day of February, 1953, and each month thereafter. Said sum to administered by, the said Superintendent of it Welfare of Iredell County for the use and bene of the said four (4) minor children. Loaf 4. That the defendant will not lo tod around any place of public entertainment Seer any place that sells or dispenses wine or , 5. That he will follow some use a gainful occupation, and will not in ane interfere with the control of the said a eeeare children now vested in the juvenile and we authorities of Iredell County. ~ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Monday, January 26, 1953 State v8 roth Mae Southers . ir 30 Wo, 1822 State . George ‘ranklin Andrews do. 1823 State vs George Franklin Andrews Wo. 1614, State v8 ffard McKinley Lackey hio, 1775 State v8 Cameron Harrison (Cam) Hayes io. 1774, State a 4. L, (Bill) Lackey flo, 1821, State v8 Joe Frank Smith Hos, 1822 a. & 1823 v8 “nee Franklin Andrews ABANDON & NON-sUPPORT Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled, Defendant withdraws her plea of Not Guilty and enters a plea of Guilty to wilful abandonment and non-support of her four (4) minor children. Judgment of the vourt is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Six (6) months and assigned to work in and around the CountyJail or other County institutions. This sentence is suspended for a term of Five (5) years on the condition that the defendant not indulge in the use of intoxicating liquors, including wine and beer and will not loaf or loiter around any place of public entertainment, including any place or establishment where wine or beer is sold or dispensed; that shewll not indulge in the use of intoxicating liquors, includ- ing wine and beer during said period, and otherwise remain of good behavior. LARCENY OF CAR A True Bill BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON - INTENT TO KILL A True Bill MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR A True Bill PERMIT MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR ON HIS PROPERTY A True Bill ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON = INTENT TO KILL A True Bill <1] SNTE & LARCENY OF CAR: BREAKING ENTERING a = vee enters @ plea of Guilty as charged. t dated for purpose of judgment. erate of the Vourt is that the defendant be igh for in the State prison at Rale eT less than four (iy) nor more than seven (7) Years. Se agian see Die en errr ee nena Sie on: aE — = ~ “ : aaa — No. 1821 State vs Parks Shumaker \No.. 1758 State vs Webster Colonel Lunsford W-1,0 Wo. 1759 State vs webster Colonel Lunsford Nos. 1769 & 1770 State vs Arthur Bailey v= 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Monday, January 26, 1953 me ee a MURDER The Grand Jury returns in open Co (sighteen present) a true bill of hel _ = i ee Parks Shumaker, with the capital offense o urder i follows: n words and figures as "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR CouRT Iredell County January 26th, Term ’ THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR 3953 That Parks Shumaker late of the County ? ne ' on the 15th day of December A. D. 1952, with fo and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfull wilfully, feloniously, and of his malice ature.’ thought, did kill and murder one Reuben Sneed contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State Zeb A. Morris Solicitor "No. 1821 State vs Parks Shumaker MURDER Witnesses J. C,. Rumpls Bunch Redmond Cleo. oneed Floyd bustle Baxter W. Scott Dr. L. bh. Little Frank McVaniels Those marked x sworn by the undersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found A TRUE BILL. L. W. Raby Foreman of the Grand Jury. RECKLESS DRIVING Defendant enters a plea of Wuilty of Reckless Driving, through his attorney W. R, Battley. Let the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of this action. The Court finding 48 a fact that the defendant was operating his car in excess of 75 miles per hour, and it is ordered that a copy of this judgment together of with a copy of this finding of fact be transnitt to the Director of Public Safety of the Motor Vehicle Vivision at Haleigh. SPEEDING Nol Pros With Leave. DRIVING DRUNK: FAIL TO STOP FOR SIREN Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Conreny onsolidated for purpose of judgment. Judgment of the court is chae the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of one cameatted and surrender his driver's license to be pe Depart to the Safety Division of the Motor Vehicle ment at Raleigh for the purpose of having bis license revoked as required by law. Gen Del, Statesville, N. C. LN=323005 “IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY Vb, 1953 Monday, January 26, 1953 LARCENY Defendant through his attorneys, McLaughlin and Battley, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: E. T. Feimster, James H Gryder, Lynn M. Barnette, H. T. Watts, Albert W. Rogers, George B, Westmore- land, L. C. Plyler, vlarence Kissinger, Mrs. Lillian Massey Stevenson, \.. ©. Bell, Marvin Sigmon and hi. C. omith. Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in the Bill of Indictment. No» 1785 State vs Wallace Raymond Moore W=35 Ho, 1824 ASoAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON - INTENT TO KILL State Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to an Assault v8 with a Deadly Weapon. State accepts the plea. Joe Frank Smith Judgment of the court is that the defendant 0-38 be imprisoned in the Comion Jail of Iredell County for a term of Eighteen (18) Months and be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public orks Commission. | thet. C~- 7° 6) No, 1813 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict vs June Banks alias Robert McClelland of Not Guilty. C-23 | J. G. Lewis is Private Prosecuting Attorney for } the State. ‘No. 1804, DRIVING DRUNK State It is ordered by the Court that this case be _ remanded to Recorder's Court for a Jury trial; Fred L, Bell Defendant is under $1,000.00 bond for his appearance at said court. No. 1819 LARCENY OF CAR _ True %ill Jack Dempsey Peacock No, 1810 DRIVING DRUNK State A True 3ill v8 8 P McHargue NO, 1819 a LARCENY OF AUTU re Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. ck It is ordered by the Court that the defendant Jack Dempsey f the Sheriff to be turned over M2 ies a 1 eeetioaey Authorities for whatever punishment they may see fit to administer or impose. NO. 14,04 NTE ARCENY (ORDER) G. ENTERING & L State a dase is continued under former oF a of the judgment requirin Rees Pri Ry Bp Pinto the Stiice of Clerk of fourt, the ' on of $500 weekly, That part is stricken out. it is further ordered that the amount = ee the Clerk's office be returned to the defen ° Linburg Price. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Monday, January 26, 1953 INo. 1814 State vs Efard McKinley Lackey Ce55 | | | | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON - INTEN Defendant through his attorney ‘cn enters a plea of Nolo Contendere to hesinds ait’ Deadly Weapon which plea the State will ac a9 Judgment of the court is that the defendayt, be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Irede}]} Co for a term of Twenty-four (24) Months and be _— assigned to work on the State Highways under th supervision of the State Highway and Public w . omnes onset is suspended for . ° erm oO ve ears on the f i conditions: FOrnOwsnG Sapveeeed 1. That the defendant pay into th the Clerk of Superior Sane of Iredell on . the sum of $1,000; $250.00 of which is to be. paid at the May Term, 1953 , (by the first day of the May term of this Court) $250.00 at the August, 1953, Teim of this Court, $250.00 at the November Term of this Court, $256.00 at the January, 1954, Term of this Court, for the use and benefit of the prosecuting witness, Charlie Little. It is further ordered that the defendant pay the cost of this action now. Said sentence is suspended upon the further condition the defendant remain of good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State of North Carolina and not induge in the use of intoxicating liquors, including wine and beer. Permission is given the court at any subsequent term during said Five (5) Year period to place this prison sentence into effect if it shgll appear that the defendant has violated any of the terms and conditions hereof, and has failed to make payments above specified. Defendant to remain on present bond until the above orders of the Court have been complied with. The defendant is to make his appearance at each Term of Court for the next Twelve (12) Months and show that he has complied with the Terms and conditions of tnis judgmnt. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, January a7 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, i. cay V) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT = =———™ FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TeRM, 1953 Tuesday, January 27, 1953 eet This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday yorning, January 27, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. Me ho, 1750 DRIVING DaUNK state Defendant through his atcorney, John McLaughlin, "8 enters a plea of Guilty as charged. yenry F. Heglar Judgment of the vourt is that the defendant W-i,0 pay a fine or $100.00 and the costs, and surrender his driver's license to be transmitted to the Sarety Division of the Motor Vehicles Department at Raleigh for the purpose of having his license revoked as required by law. Judgment on the Bond is hereby stricken out on payment of the cost of Sci Fa. Route 1, Linwood, N.C. Li-513239. No. 1833 LARCENY OF UaR State Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. vs Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be Raynond Seeds iuprisoned in the State Prison at Kaleigh for a W=22 term of not less than rive (5) nor more than seven (7) Years No, 1828 MALICIOUS INJURY TO PERSONAL PROPEATY State Defendant through his attomey, Grant volmer, vs enters a plea o.' Not Guilty. Ansel Jones Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: - James 4 Gryder, Lynn lh. Sarnette, H. T. Watts, Albert W. rogers, George 5. Westmoreland, L. U. Plyler, Clarence Kissinger, “rse Lillian Me Stevenson, W. C. Bell and hb. ¥. Smith, J. Lb. ‘ieL and T. J. Weber. ” Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in Bi of Indictment. oe of the Court is that the defendant be in the Common Jail of Iredell Vounty e assigned to ision Works Commission. - Soe cannes a term of Three (3) Years on the following expressed conditions: — 1. That the defendant remain of good behavior; 2. That he not violate any of the criminal laws of the State of Nh. Cc. or the U. S. of America; 3. That he not indulge in the use of intoxicate u including wine and beer; 1g eat be not loaf or loiter around any place I tainment either by day ornight; ' pudlivet he pay into the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell vounty, the sum of __ for the use and benefit of Charles Vincent, 4 st of this action. Pay crmission is given the court at any some term during said Three (3) ioe We tk er say son sentence into elie ! in re defendant has violated any of the terms and conditions hereof. Mo. 1832 & 18 LARCENY OF CAR State 33 A True Bill vs William A shle Raymond Se ae" aaneee sen \No. 1829 State vs Sam King Wos. 1787 & 1827 State vs Dwight C Robbins W-22 »Nos. 1817 & 1818 State vs R. B. Holland B. R. Crater \No. 1830 State vs Clyde M. White ‘Nos. 1817 & 1818 State vs R, B. Holland B. R. Crater JNo. 1763 State vs Guy Richard Elmore FIRST IN THE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK --=- JANUARY TERM, 195 Tuesday, January 27, 1953 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON - INTE —_ A True Bill NT 70 KILL — DRIVING DRUNK o. 1827, Defendant through hi Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of Not Gulley Jury sworn and empanelled as Polimer’” C. M. Westherman, J. B. Privette, J.C Pei b&b, A. Readli bavi ‘3s eee u ing, David H. Andrews, &, B, Sherri} Marvin H. McDaniels O. Coite Sloam, H. B Tol ' veaser Roy Beaver, £, T. Feimster and L, F — arren. Jury returned a verdict of Guil in the Bill of Indictment. oe No. 1787, Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to Speeding in a Residential Section, through his attorney, Marcus Nash, which plea the State will accept. Consolidated for the purpose of judgment. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Sixty (30) Days, and to be assigned to work on the state highway under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a term of Two (2) Years on the following expressed conditions: 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of this action; 2. That he not violate any of the criminal laws of the State of N. C. or the U. S. of America; 3. that he will follow some useful and gainful occupation and will not loaf or loiter in any public place or place of entertainment ; 4. That he will not indulge in the use of intoxicating liquor, including wine, beer, whi skey, or gin. The defendant is adered to surrender his driver's license to be transmitted to the Director of Public Safety at Raleigh for the eS of having his license revoked as required vy law. LARCENY OF CAR A TRUE BILL FORGERY A True Bill LARCENY OF CAR ble Defendants enters a plea of Guilty to Forel Trespassing which plea the State accepts. ¢ Prayer for judgment continued upon payme” of the cost, DRIVING DRUNK . It is ordered that the judgment of Sei Fe eretofore entered be stricken out and @s¢ is continued until next term of courte IN THE SUPERIOR COURT soeisshinccininenainenimianianiaanien FIRST WEEK «-- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, January 27, 1953 Oe 1809 Mate vs p, F. McHargue Wo, 1810 & 1811 State vs 3, F. McHargue Wel,0 ‘No, 1830 State vs Clyde M. White W-30 No. 1785 State vs Wallace Ra ymond Moore W35 Mio, 182) State vs Parks Shumak We} 3 er St a vs Troy Fesperman Wo. 16,4, te ASSAULT ON FEMALE Nol Pros With Leave. DRIVING DRUNK 5 ’ WIT } SA Saneclidazet oa. — Jury sworn and empanelled. No. 1810, At the close of all the evidence defendant through his attomey, W R Battley : — a ge ree of non-suit. Motion allowed. . ate accepts a plea i Simple Assault. : . valence ie Prayer for judgment continued for a term of Three (3) Years upon the condition the defendant be and remain of good behavior and not violate any of the Criminal laws of the State of N. C. or the U. S. of America and remain away from the Tilley and Jordan stores; to keep the peace toward the witnesses in these cases and to all other persons; that he pay the cost of this action. FORGERY Defendant through his attorney, Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of Guilty. In first count of forgery, Judgment of the court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the com.on jail of Iredell County for Four (4) Months and assigned to work in or around the County Jail or other county institution under the supervision of the High Sheriff of Iredell County. In second count of uttering anda publishing as true a certain false, forged and counterfeited bank check, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the State Prison for a term of not less than Two (2) nor more than Four (4) Years. Thissentence is to take effect at the expiration of the sentence imposed in the first count pronounced at this term a court and is suspended for Five (5) Years on the condition the defendant be and remain of good behavior and not violate any of the criminal laws of the State of N. C. or tne U. 5S. of America and that he not indulge in the use of intoxicating liquors and that he maintain and support his wife and children LARCENY Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Twelve (12) Months and be assigned to work on the state highway under the supervision of, the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Ps “1 t) MURDER The Defendant throu enters a plea of Nolo h his attorney, Mr. Avery, ontendere to Manslaughter State will accept. which plea the until the May Term Prayer for judgment continued 1953. efendant is to give $3000.00 pond for his appearance at said term of Vourt. ANDON & NON-SUPPORT ‘9 Defendant is ordered to pay the cost of capias. Continued under former order. yNo. 1829 State vs Sam King Wos. 1787 & 1827 State vs Dwight C Robbins W=22 »Nos. 1817 & 1818 State vs R. B. Holland B. R. Crater SNo. 1830 State vs Clyde M. White ‘Nos. 1817 & 1818 State vs R - B. Holland B. R. Crater JNo. 1763 State vs Guy Richard Elmore IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK e-= JANUARY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, January 27, 1953 tte —— ates me mm a me em a a me ee ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON = INTENT 70 ; A True Bill INTENT 70 KILL RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVING DRUNK No. 1827, Defendant through his attorne Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of Not Guilt Ms Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: C, M. Westherman, J. B. Privette, J.C "Pei Bh, A. Readling, bavid H. Andrews, R B. Shi ae Marvin H. McDaniels, 0. Coite Sloan, H. B ac! sola Beaver, E. T. Feimster and L, F Jury returned a verdict of Guil in eg aa. of Indictment. —— o. 1787, Defendant enters a plea of G . “> Residential Seetden. throug’ attorney, Marcus Nash a ao » Which plea the State Consolidated for the pur j pose of jud ° Judgment of the Court is that the acne be imprisoned in the common we of Iredell County for a term of Sixty (60) Days, and to be assigned to work on the state highway under the supervision of the State Highway and Public works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a term of Two (2) Years on the following a conditions: - That the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of this action; . 2. That he not violate any of the criminal laws of the State of N. C. or the U. S. of America; Be that he will follow some useful and gainful occupation and will not loaf or loiter in any public place or place of entertainment ; 4. That he will not indulge in the use of intoxicating i including wine, beer, whi skey, or gin. The defendant is ardered to surrender his driver's license to be transmitted to the Director of Public Safety at Raleigh for the ong pon of having his license revoked as required - We + LARCENY OF CAR A TRUE BILL FORGERY A True Bill LARCENY OF CAR ‘ Defendants enters a plea of Guilty to Forcible respassing which plea the State accepts. Prayer for judgment continued upon payment of the cost, DRIVING DRUNK It is ordered tha va t the judgment of Sed artreeoes entered be stricken out and ~s¢ is ntinued until next term of court. saan IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, January 27, 1953 0, 1809 Pee vs p, F. McHargue No, 1810 & 1811 State vs B, F, McHargue Wei,0 ‘No, 1830 State vs Clyde M. White W-30 No. 1785 State v8 Wallace Ra ymond Moore W335 No, 1821 State vs ks Shumaker ms Wo, 16 Rate” ASSAULT ON FEMALE Nol Pros With Leave. DRIVING DRUNK & ASSAULT WIT ) ja Consolidated ia — Jury sworn and empanelled, No. 1810, At the close of all the evidence defendant through his attomey, W R Battley, moves for judgment of non-suit. Motion allowed. No. 1811, State accepts a plea of Guilty to Simple Assault. Prayer for judgment continued for a term of Three (3) Years upon the condition the defendant be and remain of good behavior and not violate any of the Criminal laws of the State of N. C. or the U. S. of America and remain away from the Tilley and Jordan stores; to keep the peace toward the witnesses in these cases and to all other persons; that he pay the cost of this action. FORGERY Defendant through his attorney, Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of Guilty. In first count of forgery, Judgment of the court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the comu..on jail of Iredell County for Four (4) Months and assigned to work in or around the County Jail or other county institution under the supervision of the High Sheriff of Iredell County. In second count of uttering and publishing as true a certain false, forged and counterfeited bank check, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the State Prison for a term of not less than two (2) nor more than Four (4) Years. This sentence is to take effect at the expiration of the sentence imposed in the first count pronounced at this term ad court and is suspended for Five (5) Years on the condition the defendant be and remain of good behavior and not violate any of the criminal laws of the state of N. C. or tne U. 5S. of America and that he not indulge in the use of intoxicating liquors and that he maintain and support his wife and children LARCENY Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Twelve (12) Months and be assigned to work on the state highway under the supervision of, the State Highway and Public Works Commission. c pay “:t) MURDER The Defendant throu h his attorney, /r- Avery, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere to Manslaughter ich plea the State will accept. " Prayer for judgment continued until the May Term 1953. Defendant is to give $3000.00 pond for his appearance at said term of Vourt. ANDON & NON-SUPPORT ~ Defendant is ordered to pay the cost of capias. Continued under former order. Io. 1829 State vs Sam King W= 36 No. 1831 State vs Reath Taylor a No. 1824 Hi State / vs Joe Frank omith C=38 No. 1799 State vs Goldie Mae Setzer ao. 1801 State vs William Philo Witherspoon 7 * No. 1802 State vs Mack Leonard Rash Wo. 1806 i. State Hy vs Grover John Dula Wo, 1812 | State vs Troy Church “No. 1820 State vs Elvira Smith ‘Nos. 1825 & 1826 State vs Bert W. Sweet FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, January 27, 1953 a ee (ne et eee nt eee ee IN THE SUPEXIOR COURT ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON - INTENT TO xIL Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty thro h his attorney, J. G. Lewis. 46 Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of Not Guilty. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Mr. John McLaughlin is private prosecuting attorney for the State. Defendant through his attorneys, J. G. Lewis and Macon Simons, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere to Assault With Deadly Weapon. Prayer for judgment continued for a term of Three (3) Years. Power is reserved to the Court to pronounce judgment at any time in the Three-Year period. ‘The defendant will make his appearance at the January and August Terms of this Court for said Three-Year period and show by competent testimony that he has not violated any of the criminal laws of the State of N. C. and has been of good behavior. Tne defendant is to pay the cost of this action. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The judgment heretofore entered on January 26, 1953, is hereby stricken out/fhe following judgment entered in lieu thereof. UDGMENT of the Vourt is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Twelve (12) Months and assigned to work at the County Home and Farm or other County Institution. If defendant is not satisfactory, he is to serve remainder of sentence on the public roads. SPEEDING ; Upon exhibiting to the Clerk Superior Vourt 4 doctor's certificate for the defendant, this case is continued under the same bond until the May Term, 1953. DRIVING DRUNK Continued AID & ABETT IN DRIVING Di UK Continued DRIVING DRUNK Nol Pros With Leave. ASSAULT wITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued. PERJURY Nol Pros With Leave. SPEEDING: RECKLESS DRIVING Continued n = a —_— a oneeeamenen ee SRENERE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --= JANUARY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, January 27, 1953 “GRAND JURY REPORT JANUARY, 1953 The Grand Jury found True Bills of Indictment on all cases that were passed at were presented by the Solicitor. on th Committees were appointed to inspect the following County Properties: County Jail A Committee from the Grand Jury visited the Iredell County Jail Monday, January 26, 1953, Mr. Sam T. Laws, the jailer, conducted a tour of the cells and also the kitchen. The jail was found to be very clean. There were eleven white men, nine colored men and two colored women in the jail. There were two trustyS, one wno had charge of preparing food for tne inmates, the other who worked as a houseboy. It was interesting to note that the jail nad recently received a sanitation grade of A with a 98% sanitation rating from the State Health Department. The committee has no suggestions for any improvements at the jail at this time. County Home A Committee visited the County Home and find the puildings in good condition with this recommendation: That better heating facilities be installed in the . 4 chtine i s building that is now heated with wood and coal. Also, tnat better lighting fixture , j ‘ d be installed. We find 16 white men, 16 white women, 6 colored men, and 5 colore ; j help. women: 2 white men, 1 colored man & 1 colored woman as prisoners and 3 hired P Prison Camp : d prison A committee visited the Prison Camp on highway 21. We found 90 colored p r j j v0 j a Ne A inmates. All premises and buildings were found clean and in good conditio : he old Suggestion that oil stoves be placed in the sleeping quarters to replace t Coal heaters, County Vourt House i ade in The Grand Jury inspected the vourt House and find the recomendations m : fed and ‘ovenber have not been completed, such as P. M. A. Office walla be water proole dditional fans placed in the Court room for summer use. i be water The Grand Jury recommends that the walls of the Tax listing Office n the Tax Collectors Office be re It is also suggested paired and Proofed , that two leaking radiators i * Proper Sink installed in the Hall near the Grand Jury Koom. ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT — FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, January 27, 1953 No. 5228 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT that the proper Ash trays be installed and the removal of all waste from under IREDELL COUNTY stair-ways. a ¢, Morrison, Administratrix Estate of Joseph H. Morrison “7 Plaintiff a report is to be submitted to the t’oreman of the grand Jury by March, 1953, Vs. JUDGMENT Committees have been organized to inspect all schools in the County ag 5, J. Zackery, and Alexander tailroad L. W, Raby ‘ompany, a Corporation Foreman Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiding at the regular January-‘ebruary term of the Superior /No. 5427 Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Christine Robinson Continued = counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the pleadin.s have been Benjamin Robinson agreed upon by the parties, and that tne defendants have agreed to pay to the JNo.w 5378 Continued plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept tie sum of three thousand dollars Clarence L Little = ($3,000.00) and the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction thereot; lrene Morrison Little INo. 1832 Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the O- North Carolina, Iredell vounty In the Superior vourt plaintiff have and recover of the defendants tie sum of three thousand dollars State January Term January 27, 1953 ($3,000.00) and the costs of this action to be taxed by the vlerk, JUDGMENT This 2 day of Feby. 1953. vs Willian Ashley Whereas defendant William Ashley was arraigned on the charge of Larceny of Zeb V. wettles Auto at the above mentioned place and date and found guilty: Judge ‘residing It is, therefore,ordered and adjudged that the defendant William Ashley be Consent : confined in tne State's Prison under tne State iiighway and Public Works Commi ssion for a term of not less than 1 year nor more than 2 years. Capias ma commitment to ‘ary 0, Morrison adn. the foregoing sentence shall not issue if the defendant is committed to the ry C, sorrison Eastern Carolina Training School for Boys, and shall there remain of good behavior, without any attempt to escape therefrom, and obedient to the rules and regulations a, A, Hedrick of said institution, until such a time as he shall be discharged according to law. Ktorney for Plaintitr Upon the violation ofthe rules and re-ulations of the institution, or upon the ; escape from said institution, capias to issue immediately for the said defendant, Scott Collier & Nash by R. A. Collier and the above sentence to co into effect. \ | — Hugh G mitchell sa Jennings Zeb V. Nettles oon ttorneys for defendants This January 27th, 1953. Wo. 1785 LARCENY ne State Judgment heretofore entered is stricken out -~ a vs ; following is entered in lieu thereof. Judgment on mmon Wallace Raymond Moore Court is that the defendaiit be imprisoned in the °% W=35 Jail of Iredell County for a term of Twelve (12) aa w to be assigned to work in and around the County ction other County property under the supervision 4 = the of the Sheriff of Iredell County. In the oer eee defendant's work or behavior is not satisfactory, . the remainder of his sentence is to be served onefect. roads and conmitment to issue to put same into © iNo. 5347 NORTH CAROLINA | in the Superdor Court 1 IREDELL COUNTY | Before the VUlerk MOODY WHITE, Plaintiff, vs JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT LA*MISS PIPSLINE COwST? UCTION COMPANY OF -N. C., INC., Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before ©. &, omith, Clerk of the ouperior Court of +redell vounty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Vourt from the statements of the Attorney for the plaintiff and the Attorneys for the defendant that all matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties, plaintiff and defendant, and that each of said parties has released the otier party from any and all claims growing out of the controversy in this action, and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in his action, and the defendant has elected to take a nonsuit in its cause of action set forth as a counter-claim in this proceeding: It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed by the court that the plaintiff and defendant be nonsuited, all matters and things having been settled and compromised between them. It is further ordered that the plaintiff be taxed with the costs of this action. This the 9th day of February, 1953. Lv. G, Omith Cierk of Duperior court, Jredell County, North Carolina. vonsented ta: Moody white Plaintiff “. G, Lewis Attorney for Plaintirr Henderson «. Henderson By Wallace 5. Osborne Attorneys for Defendant NO» 5hly2 rth Carolina : No In the Superior Court Iredell County g, L, Lowie and Vompany, ted Incorpore Plaintiff Ws JUDGMENT I J. $. Hamrick and Wife, Omelia Hamrick, | 1/4 Statesville Ice and Coal vompany Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before tiie Honorable, Carl G. smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendants by default final; And it appearing to the vourt tnat a verified complaint was filed and sumons issued in this action on the 29th day of December, 1952; And it further appearing to the Court that said sumons together with a copy of the said complaint were served on the defendants on the 7th day of January, 1953; And it further appearing to tne vourt that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendants and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $853.42 with interest thereon from the 7th day ofJuly, 1952; NOW, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff Nave and recover of the defendants the sum of $853.42 dollars, wits interest tuereon from the 7th day of July, 1952, and the costs of this action. This 10 day of February, 1953. C, G. Smith “Tlerk of superior Court Ree KKK KKK HH FH iNo. 5466 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mary S. Sloan “. JUDGMENT Henry Grady Sloan This cause coming on to be heard at chambers before His Honor, Zeb V, Nettles, Judge of the Superior Court, at Salisburg, North Carolina, on the l0th day of February, 1953, and being heard, and it appearing to the Vourt that this is an action brought by the plaintiff arainst the defendant for alimony without divorce for the support of herself and her two minor Children, the son and daurhter of the plaintiff and defendant, and that the plaintiff is entitled to tae relief demanded in the complaint, the Vourt having read the complaint and heard the affidavits of both the plaintiff and the defendant; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant now has in his possession the approximate sum of Gisht Hundred Dollars ($800.00) and the note and mortgage due by his son, 5S. T, Sloan, in the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00): IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND AUJUDGED BY THE COURT that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the sum of rifty Vollars ($50.00) per month, beginning the lst day of March, 1953, and the said sum be made a lien against the note and mortgage held by tne defendant and due by his son, 8. T. Sloan. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this note and mortgage deed be No. 5bl9 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Jerome Dreyfuss t /a tional Ring Company intern Plaintiff VS. R, &. Cook Defendant i 1 4 JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL t | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable ¢, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default finals And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed in this cause and summons issued on the 14th day of January, 1953; and that the said summons, tocether with a copy of the complaint were served personally on the defendant on the lth day of January, 1953; And it also appearing to the court that no answe:, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed in tnis cause, and that no extension of time has been granted for the filing of such pleading, and that the time for such pleadins has expired; 4nd it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the — e ixed by the cause of action consists of a breach of contract to pay a sum of money fi : q > 7 > sum of Une Thousand Seventy Dollars (g1,0 0.00), o dba et Set ee said express contract, namely, the placed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, * n abo. with j l lay of July, 1952. and the above payments to be made from the above cash and the note and mortgage, interest thereon from the lst day oi ’ ery ed ft C I) c v1 mM Now, thereforg it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the piain = collection of said note and mortgage to be made by the Clerk of the Superior Court — 7 a aos ars (31,070.00) @ recover of the defendant the sum of Une ‘thousand Seventy Vollars (31, ’ of Iredell vounty,. * July, 1952, and the costs of this action. a 4 . i 4 IT Is FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the attomey fees for the plaintiff “th interest thereon from the lst day of be deferred until further orders of this court,and the above sum is to be paid until This 16th day of February, 1953. the final determination of this action, Zeb V Nettles Judge Presiding C, G. Smith “Clerk of the Superior vourt, dredell vounty | No.5096 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IRSDELL VOUNTY Phyllis “lizabeth Hutto BNF William L Hutto vs JUDGMiNT OF NON-SUIT Joe Khyne This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned vlerk Superior vourt of Iredell County and it appearing to the vourt that SumnonS was issued in said cause on July 3, 1951; that no return of service has been made on said summons; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the action be and same nereby dismissed and plaintiff is taxed with the cost. day of February, 1953. ‘ UC. G, Smith vlerk Superior Vourt No. 5226 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Tom Wilson e r ~? ra > Sif vs JUDGMENT Or NONeSUIT J surl Johnson Thie CaAIIG COmi ne + } 3 . + ; > ; ic this cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned /lerk Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Vourt that Summons was issued in said cause on ; that no return of ’ Service has been made on said summons: mons ; It is ) f* ‘ac ‘ , — i » tuerefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the action be am Sane is hereby dismissed ani ee : . as , Ss by dismissed ani plaintiff is taxed with the cost. 4his tle 20th day ¢ February, 1953. C, G, Smith Clerk Superior jlo. 5260 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY rs, Pearl Shook Weatherman, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT ille Motor Coach Company — The vorporate Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heared before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court from the statement of counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff ana the plaintiff has arreed to accept the sum of Five hundred and fifty dollars ($550.00) and the costs of this action in full accord and satisfuction thereof; Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Five Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($550.00) and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Vlerk. This 20 day of February, 1953. U, G, Smith Ulerk of the Superior murt Iredell Vounty Consent: R, A, Hedrick ttorney for Pla:ntil? Adams, Dearman & Winberr *vorney for Defendant POA A OS ce nee er ge mie No. 5324 IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT JNo. 5415 WORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT rEDELL COUNTY IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK pr, Lardner M Shannon Auto Parts & Electric oo. Plainti vs JUDGMENT NON-SUIT land JUDGMENT L, W, Westmore -VS- Wajter L, Campbell and irs. Walter L. Campbell, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of Lredell Vounty and it appearing to the Vourt that summons was issued in said cause on July 3, 1952; that no return of service has This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the been made on Said summons; re a ae er a, Sa an, Sane Carolina, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the action be and same and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plain- eae ae ne . , P is hereby dismissed and plaintiff is taxed with the cost. ti hat summ to the defendants Walter L. Campbell and M - Walter L, - iff that summons to the defen s W e ampbe n rs alter This the 20th day of February, 1953. Campbell have been returned, "Not to be found in Iredell County,"; that the a a cali ’ ve 8 U. G. Smith IS OO oe ais , ‘ : p oO plaintiff's attorney is informed and believes that the said defendants have Vilerk Superior Court moved to Georgia where they have established their permanent residence and has elected to take a nonsuit in order to clear this case from the Court Docket; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs heretofore paid by the plaintiff, This 25th day of February, 1953. C, G, Smith Yo. 4693 Clerk Superior Vourt . NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Consented to: a ner IREDELL COUNTY SCOTT, COLLIER & NASH B L h John M Gaither i y &. LL. Nas | Attorneys for the plaintiff. vs JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT { { J, C, Greene, C. H. Sears “"arlotte Motor Car Co., A vorp. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned vierk Superior Vourt and it appearing to the court that the action was instituted on ‘une 9, 1949 and that no answer has been filed; that tie plaintiff desires to take a Voluntary non-suit; lt is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the vourt that the Plaintie is hereby non-suited and taxed with the cost of this action. T , '4s the 20th day of February, 1953. C, G, smith Ulerk Superior vourt “NSented to; eke Battie Woney for Plaine — North Carolina In the Superior C Iredell Vounty George 1. Wike VS. Judgment William A, Sloop, T/A _ Home Appliance « Electric ; Co. This cause coming on to be heard, Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell vounty, and to the vourt tnat Summons in the above entitled action was issued of Nov., 1952; that the Sheriff o1 redell vounty made his return showing that the defendant, William A. Sloop, was not to be found Jounty; and that service or summons by publication has been had up William A, »loop; And it further appearins to the vourt trat a warrant of att issued on ll]t. day of hov. 1952, ordering tne seizure and attacnme peperty of tie jefendant, william «a. Sloop, which mirht be found i that said warrant of attachment was returned on the llthd vounty; showing that attached and taken into custody of tue Sheriff; that notice of tne return of tue attachment was duly advertised in the Moo pape., once a week for four successive weeks, as required by law; That the time for filing pleadings on tne part of and that no answer, uemurrer or other pleading .as been filed by t And it further appearing to tne vo recover the sum ot bl, note and chattel mortgage signed by said uefendant; Now, therefore, it is ordered, ad judged, and decreed tnat and recover judrnent against the defendant, William 4. oloop, 2.00 dollars, torether with the costs of tnis action; ounty, as in case ol e into the ofiice or tne sroceeds may be applied to t anto or that any in full; pi, 392.00 dollars, t tiis action, remain j e office of said Ulerk for the be fendant, William A, Slo y. An “har ele , ‘ nd ner or lered, ind decreed that this pe operati net proceeds from the rt that this is an ac jon bro ta 7 e property of tne defendant, jua ent T. 1S that tnis J ourt jefendant, William A. Sloop. This 26th day of February and being heard before the Honorable it appearing on llth day on said sumnons in Iredell on the defendant, achment was nt of all of tx n Iredell ay of Nov., 192, certain personal property of tne defendant, William A. Sloop, had been issuing and of ‘2 resville Tribune the defendant has elapsed he defendant. ught to 392.00 dollars, due the plaintiff by the uefendant on @ e plaint iff ¢ for the sumo that tne at vacned xecution, and vle rk of the he satisfacti™ surplus over ogetier with + nefit ad the jud gment gale of the d willia shall mot operate 1953. as Mf 430 Vow SUYI-A IN THE SUPERIOK COURT Die'si MARCH TERM, 1953 NORTH CASOLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, Monday, March 9th, 1953 ROWAN COUNTY. NOVEMSER TERM, 1951, NORTH CAROLINA, IN Norman Wesley Connor IREDELL COU! TY. MARCH TERM, 19 JUDGMENT - Y) . f S ner > y , - inson Connor Be it remembered that a Superior Court bevun and held | d for the State . . » ’ ’ ,A C i y » ayn} ( / cause coming yn to ve heard and Qein heard at this Term of the Superi and County aforesalc, on the 9th aay of Mar Cli, ) wnen an where His t or Rowan County, North Carolina, vefore His Hon He i 4 zev Ve Nettles, Jud;e Presidiny Holding Courts for the Fit'teenth Judie! Rowan County, North Carolina, vefore His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Pre. Honor, ° , (teenth Judicial $ } } 2 * . 4 M , Tearm Gb4 or and a jury, and the jury having answered the issued submitted to it by the District March Term, 1953, is pres . J. C. Rumple, High Sher‘ff of Ilrede yunty returns into oven Cou favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the recon: 2 names of the following good and lawful m and women to serve as Jurors is, therefore », ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matri : . ’ oO . h { } wy 9 4 1 “tfe } rt S81 yf Cr iv tofore existin yetween the plaintiff, Norman Wesley Conr sr, and the de the Marcn i ermy, 1954, Tredell yun vy u er yr ) Ces J. 8. Blackwelder i, P. Bost F, G. Davidson ve be, and the same are heresy dissolved, and the plain ‘yoree from the deferdant. French Holmes se. Vivian D. Wilkirson James } Jeoer Barnes \ ce Davis James He HJYLE SINK satel a allies . 7 7 1m THK a Artnurs i tr. Crider Clarence Judge Presiding Feimster Summers a ee “ =oee Hepler Blackourn Harold superior Court of Kowan County, North Caro- Crawford H Howard J. J. Kiser oe a true and correct copy of the judgment 4 Thompson urs. Chester L. Killer Wiss Louise Wilhelm entitled, "Norman Wesley Connor vs. Mattie Johnson irs, Berthe Benfield Ww. F. Feimster Ralph H. Shuford moer Term, 1951, as the same is taken from and compared R. M. Summers Dick Kimoall F. ©. McAuley fice and recorded in Minute Docket No. 38, page Blackburn, W. C. Davis were excused by the Cour te ni Rees Bertha Benfield was excused vy the Clerks icial seal, this 27th day of February, . ‘ ‘fing Davidson end Clarence C. Upright were excused on Doctor's Cert ficatee Sara S. McCubdvins : Crider was excused by Statute. ASS'T CLoaRK CUPFRIOR - . COUNTY, NORTH C: i. V. Crews and H. N. Howard were not found. ne ane ns ae Seat enn ? he t t t "Dh vr The following men constitute what snall hereinafter be termed the “Divorce Holmes, L. “. Carnes, H, We Arthurs, ee ae Jury #1" to-wit: J. S. Blackwelder, French d. Th ymnsony Re ue Summers, Ne Ps S. Hepler, L. R. Crawford, 1. Mrs. Vivian D. Wilkinson and W. ©. Davis es . t "Divorce The following men constitute what shall hereinafter 0e termed the ~D Jur , ’ nh Wau Je Je Kiser Ty #2" to-wit: J. L. Wilkinson, A. G- Blankenship, Je Ralph Waugh, . James E. Pharr, Clyde Andersons Ze Ve i " F. Feimster, Dick Kimball, James K. Weber, “otherton, John White Moore, Harold R. Overcashe "No, 5403 Pegew | °88y Brady Howell by her DIVORCE ] rn and empan- next friend, Paul Brady 0 The Divorce ] * " g 5 0 Jury #1" Being duly sy 4t as follows: elled answers the issues submitted to vs. Daviq Howell IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH ‘TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR CURT, NORTH CAROLINA, MARCH TERM, 1953 IREDELL C)UNTY Pessy Brady Howell by her next friend, Paul Brady VSe TSBsBUES Davida Howell 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the S : jas inti e State of North C A ( nh Yarolina fo 1a for stx months next vreceding the institution of this action? Answer’ Yes 2. Were the nlaintiff and defendant j 3 h laintiff anda ac married as alleved int -_<-o"" he complaint? Answer’ Yes J 4. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived sepa e re ant ao 1adiw TA wre © e : ai } art continusd isly 1or two years nex preceding the institi tion of thi 5 > sri lin his IN THE SUPERIOR COURT M\RCH TERM, 1953 JUDGMENT ye heard before Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, Judge vil Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court, and be- -2 V. Nettles, and a Jury, the following issues resident of the State of North Carolina for the institution of this ect'on? iefendant married as alleged in the complaint? he plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived — and apart cont ‘nuous11 a nuously for two years next preceding the institution of this The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". Tt is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the donés of matrimony heretofore existing osetween the plaintiff and defendant be forever dissolved, and the plaintiff, Percy Brady Howell, is hereby granted 4 divorcee @ vinculo from the defendant, David Howell, and that the cost of this action 9¢ tax against the plaintiff by the Clork Zeb Vo Nettles cee udze Presiding He eereee ee eee BD IN THE SUPHRIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 enn — ern ne ennEEEEEEEEIEENEEEEEEEEEE cence [Noe 5409 R, MC Jolley VSe frances A. Jolley DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #2" Beir ng duly sworn a é swers the issues submitted to a ———. sai yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Rn, Mc. Jolley VSe ISSUES frances A. Jolley 1. Were the plaintif* and the defendant lawfully married as complaint? Answer: Yes 2, Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of tnis action? Answer: Yes 3, Has the plaintiff been @ oona fid ss ident lina for six months next preceding the Answer: Yes YORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. R Me. Jolley 0 V8. 0 Frances A. Jolley 0 This cause coming on to oe heara ana being heard before His honor, Zeb Ve settles, Judze Presiding and a jury at the March term of the Su erior Court of T an ~ 3 } iredell County, and it appearing to the court that defendant has oeen properly serv- ed with process by publication, and the f>llowing issues having been submitted to answered by the jury? l. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the compla int? Answer: "Yes." + ar) f e Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived sepsrate and apart from exch other + wy £ 92 ? for two years next preceding the pringing of this action? Answers "ves," State of North Caro- 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the ling is action? for six months next preceding the oringing of th Answer: "Yes," Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff R. lute divorces from the defendant Frances Ke Jo lley be and he is hereby granted sn abso etween the plain- A, ' Jolley, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing 0 titer and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. A832 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH ‘TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOK CURD IREDELL C)UNTY MARCH TERM, 195% , Persy Brady Howell by her next friend, Paul Brady VSe David Howell 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of horth Carol4 e i na for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer’ Yes 2. Were the nlaintiff and defendant married as alleved in the complaint? Answer: Yes 4, Were the plaintifr and defendant separated, and have they lived separ art continuously for two years next preceding the Institution of this IN THE SUPERIOR COURT M\RCH TERM, 1953 JUDGMENT ard before Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, Judge lerm 1953 Iredell County Superior Court, and be- V. Nettles, and a Jury, the following issues resident of the State of North Caroline for institution of this act'on? defendant married as alleged in the complaint? sfendant separated, and have they lived seper and apart cont tnuosusly > ‘ nts nuously r two yee preceding the institut-on of this The Jury hs , ; y haviny answered all of said issues "Yes". it is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudyed and decreed that the ponds of tri » ve . of matr mony heretofore existin Aant be forever oetween the plaintiff and defen dissolved, and the plaintif’: ff, Pescy Brady Howell, is hereby grented 4 divorce ® vinculo f he def : of lo from the defendant, David Howell, and that the cost of this action ¢ van against the plaintiff by the Clork 44 . Zeb Ve Nettles nee Jude Presiding teeta RH eee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 Oe as [Noo 5409 t . : 2 . tu vs ( The Divorce Jury #2" Leing duly sworn and empanelled an- prances Ae Jolley ( swers the issues submitted to it as follows: NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUrERTOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH THRM, 1953 n, Mc. Jolley VSe frances A. Jolley 1. Were the plaintif® he defendant lawfully marr! complaint? Answer: Yes } ¢ Haw a a4 r “a c T » laf’ ‘ } ’ } 2, Have the plaintiff and the cefencant separate and apart from es other for two ars next prececing the ings of this action? Answer: Yes 3, Has the plaintiff beon lina for six months next precedin Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Ro Mc. Jolley 0 V8. 0 Frances A, Jolley 0 This cause coming on to ve neara ymnor, 4eb Nettles, Judze Presiding and a jury at the March t Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that been properly serv- } : ‘ a hay i 4 a J ed with process by publication, and the fsllowing issues havin bec! submitted to na “id answered by the jury’ le Were the plaintiff end the aelen iant lawfully married as allesed Compla int? Answer: "Yes." ee Have the plaintiff and defendant lived se ‘arate and apart from e ch ot p , , ‘ her for two yoars next preceding bringing of t! ts action? Answers "Yes." gy , , 3 * North Caro- 3- Has the plaintiif been 4 bona fide resident of the State of or h lr action? 1a . ‘ , >} for six months next preceding the oringing of this Answer: "Yes," Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Re ™ Polley ve and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Frances A, eine Jolley, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plain tif f'and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 Ana it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to ve taxed by the Clerk. This the 9th day of March, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Judge Fres{ding ‘No. 513 Margie Mize Combs DIVORCE . \Ioeur " The Divorce Jury #2° Being duly sworn and empandiea answers the issues submitted to it as follows; . HE SUPERIOR CO TERM, 1953 4 lefendent intermarry as 2llesed in the Con hey lived the Complaint? rth Carolina for j 963 ard and being heard at the Ma ‘ch Term, 195% vefore His Honor, Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Pree ‘ ving answered all the issues submitted to it +f and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record} is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of mattie mor neret ‘Are wf « - ny tofore existin: between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the ss? ; ‘ is are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff he reby ‘ra ted an } r "9 Ast , mn ayso ite dative . “ve ii ITCE ir »m the detendante This the 9th day > Maw h ty Of Mar ch, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles ee Judge Presiding UPR RR EHR EHH © IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 Io ’ 54.17 a Davis VSe : yay Kurfees Davis Q DIVORCE 0 The Divorce J.ry #2" Being duly sworn and empanndlea Q answers the issues submitted to 1t as follows: yoRTH CAROLINA, IN THE Sl COURT, [REDELL COU! TY. MARCH 1 1, B. Davis A VS. vay Kurfees Davis . pid tne nlaintiff ear vend and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answers: __ Yes 2. Did the plaintiff ari defendant senarai ey lived separate + and apart from esch other for more than two yeons | J he institution of this action, es alleged in the c »mplaint? Ars wer: Yes 3. Has the vlaintiff for more than six months before complaint? May Kurfees Davis This cause coming on to be ouUnerionr Cray , . : perior Court of Iredell County, énd a fury, and the jury having answered all the issues submit! the tiff and against the defendant, 4s fully appears the Court that there ’ 5 } fands child, Carolyn Davis, ana ie defendal said child; and it further ap ring to tne that the defendant is a fit and suitadile person tr trol of ; ‘ of the minor child, Carolyn Davis, ne that % s Would be »s : » mothe d be served boy being ‘tn the custody 9f her mother, Perso , A n for the custody sf said minore oonds of matrimony is, therefore, ordered, adjud red and decreed eretor 2 ‘on dant ana the same are hereby fore existing between the plaintiff and «efenaan” 1G, AF , Age ie dj se from the defend- rived, and the plaintiff is hereby 5r@ ted en absolute ijivorce fr fend A ‘urfees i further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defen tant, May Kur D * a ‘ q 1 of avis, 06 and she ‘3 hereby awarded full and c ymplete care, custody ana ontro the olaintirf pay to the defendant, May Kurfees minor child, Carolyn Davis; that tne : . ‘ Carol 12.50 per week for the support and maintenance of the minor child, U4 yn eee Fi A836 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 Davis, first payment to ve made on the 9th day of march, 1954 and each Saturday of each and every week thereafter until further orders 7f the Court, This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody and support of the ming» child, is retained for further orders. - This the 9th day of March, 1953. Zed V. Nettles Judge Pres{ding % ue 42 8 ‘No. 523 ‘}1mer Johnson Dellinzer DIVORCE vore 7 " 2 > vee ) The Divorce Jury #2 Seing duly sworn and empane)ted Dellinzer ) answers the issues submitted to it as follows: ' IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 they lived the Complaint? heard at the fc aAinz iredell County, vefore Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presidiny jury havins answered all the ‘ssues submitted to it in the asairet the defendant, as fully appears in the records ser OC Aasen 4 ‘ a . . a ints++ Sourt that there were born of the marriage of the - 4 ' : a‘ nas oild, Mary Lois Dellinger, and that the plaintiff herein * the c: -_ j the f said child; and it further appearing to tne court and yO t fine 6 ’ ne urt finds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and euitable person to nave t custody and control pest in of the minor child, Mary Lots Dellinger, and that the terest of said mitnor . e veins ior would serve by being in the custody of ner mother, sh found d ) a t Y Ae, , ‘ to ve a fit person for the custody of said minor. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 ‘Oo ordered, adjudged and decr Kes It is, cnerefore, » adjudged end decreed that the bonds of matr!trony ; r be € he plain ‘f and daefendar ; ; neretofore existing between t plaintiff and defendant be, and > same are hereby : f 46 heared ran qd an } waited, and the nlaintiff is hereby ‘ranted an absolute divorce from the deferd- nt It 1s further ovdered, adjudged ana decreed that the plaintiff, Gilmer J>hnson . $ ymahw awnar 7 ais ee Dellinger s be and she is hereby aw rded full snd complete care, custody and control child, Mary Lois Dellinger. cause, in so far as it relates to tne ed for further orders. This tne 9th dav sf March , No. 5426 “{]]4am D. Keavis ( DIVORCE VS. ( The Divorce Jury 7 Rertha P. Reavis ) answers the issues s YORTS CAROLINA, IKEDELL COUNTY William D. Reavis VS. 0 Yertha P. Reavis 0 l Did the plaintiff and the Answer Yes 2. Did the defendant separate from apart from a period of two years or Answer Yes 4. Has the plaintiff been Mre than six montns next preceding Answer Fos —— ee NORTH CANOLINA IREDELL county 4) “lllfiam D, Keavis Vs. 0 Sértha Pp na Pp. Reavis 0 i . ‘ ° ov ‘ h March lerm 195 This cause coming on to be heard 4 1d being heard at the “aren rm, 3 es - Zev Ve. N «. Judge Presiding, vor Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Zeb V- Nettles, 5 ssues guomitted to 4t in the favor and q , ' Jury, and the jury having answered all the 4 of the d; and it ne ¢ ; va : npea: ) the recor laintiff and against the defendant, “8 fully appears in , ‘pearing of the marriage of the plaintiff and the to the Court that there was born dant herein has the care and def sndant a child, Sybil Ann Reavis, and that the defen . as he custody and con- 4 \- fact that the defendant is a fit and suitable person to have t Re pete e. Ss State of North Carolina Deparhnent of Archives and History Raleigh SPLICING AUTHENTICITY CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the following records of LTREDELL County consisting ot MYN WTE DOock ET Su PER (Of? Cour Ry 3 0 beginning with TAGE a and ending vith L2G E 1+ Ht | have been microfilmed to correct an error in, or to improve the quality of, the original film. The error or the unsatisfactory image or images will be cut out of the original film and the retake beginning and ending as indicated above will be spliced in as a replacement. This is further to certify that the microphotographic processes were accomplished in accordance with Chapters 8~i,5,1~-6-45.4, inclusive, General Statutes of North Carolina, by the undersigned on the date and at the reduc- tion ratio indicated below. nate fo —-/—6S _Reduction i * | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 A36 Davis, first payment to ve made on the 9th day of March, 1953 and sai ane y of each and every week thereafter until further orders of the Court, This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody and support of | ide the minop | child, is retained for further orders. Wah This the 9th day of March, 1953. i} Zed V. Nettles | Judge Presiding ene i] Seer tee eae ue eee Bat AMNo. 523 | | | Gilmer Johnson Dellinger ) DIVORCE | 1} VS. ( The Divorce Jury #2" Being duly sworn ana empanelled at Chal R. Dellinger Q answers the issues submitted to it as follows: , i | } NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i} IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1953 it Gilmer Johnson Deilinger 0 H ee. ) ISSUES } Chal R. Dellinger ] lj 1. Did the rlairtif*® end the defendant intermarry 2s alleged in the Com plaint? it 2. Did tne defendant separate from the plairtiff and have they lived separete and apart for a period of two years or more as “alleged tn the Complaint? ——_-- * He & 1 ~ a 2 ‘ — se ; ; ; ) lias the plaintiff been a resident of the stats of rth Carolina for a more than six months next nreceding the filing of this Complaint? NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1953 rilmer Jonnson Dellin-er 0 This cause cominz on to be heard and vein: heard at the March Te Superior Court of Iredell County, vefore His Honor Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Pres } Sesenes 2 and a jury, and the jury having answered all the ‘issues submitted to 4t in the » , a: favor of the nlaintiff an: asainet the defendant, as fully appears tn the recores ef ‘ ne 2 - ‘ + : . D aintif and it appearing to the Court that there were born of the marriage 0° the pl ” jefend as and the defendant a child, Mary Lois Dellinger, and that the olaintifr herein } mee § : the the care and custody of said child; and it further appearing to the Court and to nave the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person est im custody and control of the minor child, Mary Lois Dellinger, and that the > terest of said minor would serve by being in the custody of her mother’, found to ve a fit person for the custody of said minor. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony neretofore ex iissolved, ate pellinger, be and she of t isting between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby and the plaintiff ts hereby jranted an absolute divorce from the defend- It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Gilmer Johnson is hereby awarded full snd complete care, custody and eyntrol he minor child, Mary Lois Dellinger. This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, is ree tained for further orderse This the 9th dav of March, 1954. No. 5426 william D. Reavis VS. Rertha P. Reavis WORTS CAROLINA, IKEDELL COUNT’ William D. Reavis vs. 3ertha P. Reavis le Did t plaint? Answer ate and apart fro Answer 3. Has the mre than six montns next preceding the f% Answer plaintiff and a period of two years or more as al plaintiff been a resident oJ we Zed V. Nettles act iw SAL y Judge Presiding a a z x 2% Q DIVORCE ) The Divorce Jury #2" Bein: duly svorn and empanelled ) answers the issues submitted to it as follows: I RIO. COURT, Q ISSUBS 0 4 4 ° * oe ‘ ‘ the defendant intermarry as all WORTH CAXOLINA IREDELL COUNTY William D. Reavis vs. 3ertha P, Reavis This cause coming on to oe heard and veing Sup ‘da Jury, and the jury having answered all the .ss f the plaintire and against the defendant, 48 ‘PPering to the Court that there was born “efendant a child, Sybil Ann Reavis, and cu ody of saia child; and it further appearin ior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, 4 fo St that the defendant is a fit and su ‘RCH TERM, 1953 0 JuDGMENT , at 1eard at the marcn term, 1953 * nT +1008 Zeb Ve N@UULLIES, sssues submitted it > 1} 4 fully appears in the record; 8” the c of the marriage of the nlaintiff and nt herein has the care and that the defenda court finds 4s g to the Court and the tody and con- e cus Stable person to have th Judge Pres iding,s to it in the favor “A838 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT t MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 trol of the minor child, Sybil Ann Reavis, and that the best interest of Said mi nor would be served by being in the custody of her mother, she 9eing found to dea fit person for the custody of said minor, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudsed and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing ovetween the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the Same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, Bertha P, Reavis, dc and she is hereoy awarded full and complete care, custody and contro) of the minor child, Syoil Ann Reavis, It is further ordered, ad judsed and decreed that the plaintiff, William p, Reavis pay to the defendant, Bertha P. Keavis the sum of #40200 per month for the use ana benefit of the minor, Syodil Ann Reavis, the first payment to ve made as of the first day of Marca, 1953 and a like payment on the first day of esch ang every calendar month thereaft as long as said minor is in the ectnal custody of Bertha Reavis, said payments c until the minor, Syvil Ann Reavis attains the ise emancinated. it relates to the Jivorce Jury #2" Being duly sworn ana empan the issues submitted to as follows: NORTH CARILINA, IN Ti IREDELL COUNTY MARCHE Elree 0. Wilson * , fo . ¢ a 4 on- ‘intiff and defendant attempt to enter into a marriage ¢ Complaint? Answer Yes . , ; : ; al leged 2. If so, did the defendant, at that time, have a living husoand 48 in the Complaint? Answer Yes 2S 4ng ‘ Ly. ° — ears N th Carolin de Has the plaintirr been @ vbonafide resident of the State of Nor Answer Yeas ee IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 yoRTH C AROLINA IREDELL COUNTY giree 0. Wilson ) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT * MARCH TERM, 1953 VSe JUDGMENT Yattle Re Thomas Wilson This cause coming on to 92e¢ heard and being heard at this Term of the Super~ tor Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, vefore His sor or, Zed Ve. Nettles, judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to + it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and azainst the defendant. a set suk ae ses the records. It is therefore, ordered and adjudzed by the Court, that the purported arriaze contract between the plaintiff,Elree 0.Wilsg, and the defendant, Mattie R. 1 is absolutely null and void, and it its therefore, ordered, adju:i‘ed Wson, was and is : and decreed that the plaintiff and the defe 5439 Joe B. Stutts DIVIRCE VS. 0 he Divorce Boboie Jean Lytle Stutts Q answers t WORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY Joe B. Stutts V8. Sobbie Jean Lytle Stutts 1. Were the plaintiff ar Complaint? Answer: Yes e. Has the plaintiff been lira for at least six months next An swer: Yes 3+ Have the plaintiff and other for at least two years next Answer: Yes NORTH C AROLIN IREDELL counry Joe B, Stutts 0 Vs. 0 Bo bie Jean Lytle Stutts 9 oe f His Honory This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before redell rior Court, It Judge Presiding at the March 1953 term of the Supe Nettles, AAO IN THE SUPERIOR Cour? MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 County, North Carolina, and a Jury, and it appearing to the Court that the det end. ant has been personally served with summons, and the followins issues having een submitted to and answered by the Jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as Slleged 4 th Nn the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Cap ” lina for at least six months next preceding the bringing of this action? > na se Se Answer: Yes. 3- Have the plaintiff snd defendant livea Separate and apart from each Other for at least two years next preceding the obrinzing of this action? Answer: Yes, 3 a1 And all of said issues having been answered in the affirmative; Now tnerefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed trast the Plaintire, Joe B. Stutts, be and ne is hereby sranted an absolute Givorce from the Defendant, + Yv Boboie ean ean Lytle Stutts, and that the bd mds of matrimony heretofore existing be- the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, 1953- Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding March Term of the Sur of Iredell County tia +z "Now 5iphi2 DIVURCE The Divorce Jury answers the issues Roscoe Morrison VS. Creola Perram horrison 1. Did the the defendant intermarry Answer Yes ES 2e Did the de ; . separ stendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived s¢ . . ty +9 ate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint’ Answer Yes : ina for d+ Has the plaintiff been o resident of the State of North Carolina ! more than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer Yes eae IN THE SUPERIOR Cour? MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday March 9th, 1953 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1953 goscoe Morrison = é JUDGMENT creole Pegram Morrison This cause coming on to be heard and beinz heard at the March Term, 1953 Superior Court of lredell County, »before His Hor or, Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answered all the issues sudmitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudzed and decreed that the bonds of atrimony . ne defend Ky and th Ss r neretofore existing vetween the he aerendant be, and the same are, and the vlaintiff is hey sranvied an abs te divorce from the 9th day of March, 19534. Noe 5445 Vicle P. Taylor MM E VS. T) bivorce James ¥. Marlow NORTH CAH OLINA, IREDELL COUNTY Viele P. Taylor Varlow VS. James M. Marlow 1, Were the vlaintiff Complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Has the plaintiff beer ina for six (6) months next Answer: Yes je Have the plaintiff a other for two ycers next preceding Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 County, North Carolina, and a Jury, and it appearing to the Court that the defeng ant has been personally served with summons, and the followinz issues having been submitted to and answered by the Jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Caro. lina for at least six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes. 4. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for at least two years next preceding the orinzing of this action? Answers Yes. And all of said issues having been answered in the affirmative; Now tnerefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed taat the Plaintiff, Joe B. Stutts, ve and ne is hereby sranted an absolute divorce from the Defendant, Boboie Jean Lytle Stutts, and that the donds of matrimony heretofore existing be- tween the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby cissolved. This 9th day of March, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding March Term of the Suverior Court of Iredell County See Hee RHE S "No. 51 Roscoe Morrison 0 DIVORCE : VS- The Divorce Jury #2" Being duly sworn and emnanelled Creole Pegram Morrison 4 answers the issues submitted to it as follows: NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1953 Roscoe ‘iorrison Q VS. Q ISSUES Creola Pevram Morrison Q : i : a n ¢ Com 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the plaint? Answer Yes e 2. Dic ief ‘ i have they lived sepa ° id the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have ‘ n - in 9 ate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Yom laint Answer Yes ‘ : for 3. Has the plaintiff been e resident of the State of North Caroliné IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday March 9th, 195% . THE SUPE OTT yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1REDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1953 goscoe Morrison 0 Q JUDGMENT VSe creola Pegram Morrison ( This cause coming on to be heard and beinz heard at the March Term, 195 suoer Lor Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiding, upe ga Jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor an ’ f the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; 5 r : 7 Ar ang > rea and dean h he } A r rim It is, therefore, ordered, adjud zed end decreed that the bonds of matrimony 1 " aintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, neretofore existing ovetween tne laint f . : Ia intitft s her: AeaYN J an a j divorce fron ne hereby @issolved, and the olaintiff is heres) granved an absolute orce from t defendant. This the 9th day of March, 1954-6 Zeb V. Nettles Judge Fresiding a a % “ = Noe 54L5 i a nm "TD Viele P. Taylor Marlow Q DIVINCE ow da Boks ly sworn and lied Th wer C Fa Ala J ~ -4 = VSe 0 oor DFS : + -5y tt as follows: James ¥. Marlow Q enswers ti¢ SucEss NORTH CAP OLINA, waRCH TERM, 1953 IREDELL COUNTY ee ee Viele P. Taylor Varlow 90 vs eater . James M. Marlow Q 2 ¢ a Lr v e Aa art lewfully marr. as : l. Were the volaintiff ar Complaint? Answer: Yes been a resident of 2. Has the plaintiff lina for six (6) months next preceding th nS Answer: Yes 4. Have the plaintiff ana tne ” * ° + other for two years next preceding the Answer: Yes Garo more than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer Yes 442 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR CoURT MARCH TERM Monday, March 9th, 1953 | ! — - | NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | * IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1953 Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina Vicie P. Paylor Marlow 0 for more then six months preceding the bringing of this action? it “a ) JUDGMENT Answer: __Yes | ! James M. Marlow 0 aia : | THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Z, y, Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other HI Nettles, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the March Term of the Superior Court of for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? | iE Iredell County, and it anpearing to the Court that the defendant has been personally Answer: Yes | servec with process, and the following issues having been submitted to ana answered Pee ee by the jury: ee Answer: Yes | i} le. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the il] : BM complaint? | Answers Yes 2. Has the pnlaintiff been a s0na fide resident of the State of North Caro. | 4 1 af | lina for six rorths next prececing the bringing of this action? | | 4- Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and avart from each sther for two years next preceding the brinzing of tnis sction? : Answer: Yes ial 1 Now therefore, on motion of Finch end Chamblee, Attorneys for the plaintiff, it is ordered, sdjudzed, and decreed that the plaintiff, Vicie P. Taylor Marlow, ve and she is hereby “ranted an absolute divorce from the defendant, James li. Marlow, the plaintiff and aad 9f matrimony heretofore existing between them, defendsnt, be and they are hereby dissolved. lover that there were no children born of this marr.sgt plaintiff pay the costs of this action» WNo. 5447 Richard Dix Justice DI VORCE : VS. 0 The Divorce Jury #2" Being duly sworn and Sarbara Bowling Justice ( answers the issues submitted to it as follows: NORTH CAROLINA, IN TH® SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1953 Richard Dix Justice VS. 0 ISSUES Barbara Bowling Justice I ; the Com Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married 4s alleged in plaint? Answer: Yes enn eensees ' Se on, eee eee tee eee eed IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 ho. 54.50 Robert Lee Campoell VS. Jessie Lee Campbell DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #2" Being duly s answers the issues submitted to t¢ aa eae ovo] nd empane) lows: ted NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE ST . [REDELL COUNTY \ {HE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Robert Lee Campbell VS. ISSUES G a — a Jessie Lee Campbell 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged ir the ¢ y z - -. olaint? Answer Yes 2. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they liveg —_ e ti - pare ate end apart for ap ars . k period of two yesrs or more as the Comolaint? Answer Ves 4e- Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina fop more than six months next vreceding the filing of this Comrleint? Answer Yes NORTE CAROLINA IN T RT a + WwW JV ile IREDELL COUNTY KC} c sJUN LIL MARCH TEI , 19 53 Robert Lee Camnvell 0 Se 0 JUDG NT Jessie Lee Campvell 0 This cause coming on to ve heard and oeing neard at the ch Term, 1953 Sune ri ’ suirt of Iredell Con , ; P 5 or Court of Iredell County, vsefore His Honor, Zeb VY. Nettles, Judge Presiding, ard +7 , .¢ } } and a Jury, w the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff i again th laintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; It -S, therefore, rdere ly adjud red and decreed that the y9nds of matrimony he ++ " r " reretofore existing v,etween the plaintiff and the defendant ve, and the same or, divorce from the hereby dissolved, and t? a a on . J lved, and the plaintiff is hereb” granted an absolute defendamt. This the 9t os ‘ jth day of March, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles ee Juage Presiding 2a 222 22 2% @ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARGH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 {Noe 5452 Janes Boyce Hayes vs. frankie Marie Hayes YORTH © AROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY Janes Boyce Hayes VSe frenkie Marie Hayes 1. Did the vlaintiff end defendant intermarry, and Q DIVORCE Q The Divorce Jury #2" Bein C Deing duly sworn DE ( swers the issues submitted to iia aa 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 0 I ] SSUES hey now husband cr are mi wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Bid Answer: Yes 3. Fas the plaintiff veen « for mre than six months prior to the com Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY James Boyce Hayes VS. Frankie Marie Hayes This cause coming on to oe neal Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury hevir the defendant commit adu ltery as alleged in th oO Complaint? rolira yonafide resident of the State of North 0: yncement of this action? IN T MR CO T MA » 1955 0 JUDGMENT rd and vein, heard at this Jerm xf the Super- , C f hi : Z t] Judg for Court of Iredell County, Nort! Carolina, vefore his “onory, Zeo V. ttles, a) swered the issues su t t k ntiff, and 8 -ainst the aele? t, as set out the the Court ir records: It is, therefore, mony heretofore existing between the pls‘! tiff, Pp ‘rerkie Marie Hayes, be, and the same are, favor of tne clai ordered and adjudged by tne Court thit the James dissolved, ™ absolute divorce from the defendant. No. 5453 Pauline §, Morrison 9 vs. Ydel] Morrison ORTH CARO LINA Pauline 8S. Morrison Vs. del) Morr ison 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant adaze Presiding 4 = : ee? ™ 0 DIVORCE ft « 5 y ad em anelled ae l sworn an os 0 The Divorce Jury etry, ‘6 tt as follows: pmitted IN THE SUP RIOR CURT 0 answers the issues su 0 0 ISSUES 0 4ntermaerrys and are they now husband Pe Wife, as alleged in the Complaint? divi ey ae ee ANSwer: Yes TN NR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH THRM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 DIVIRCE The Divorce Jury #2" Being duly sworn ana \ empane] answers the issues submitted to it as follow nelled 8: IN E SUPERIOR Court TH MARCH TERM, 1953 ISSUES ieferndant intermarry as allerze 2 1 in the Con. otate Comr nor, ssues subdmi fully appears in tne record; decreed that the vonds >f matrimony ant be, and the same are, an absolute divorce from the a Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 ( DIVORCE <a, ( The Divorce Jury #2" Seing duly sworn and empane lled an- cvankie Marie Hayes ( swers the issues submitted to it as follows: “i fl , IN THE SUPERIOR COU at CAST MARCH TERM, 1953 ” Janes Boyce Hayes vse 0 enkie Marie ayes Q 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermerr} end are they now husvand © end wife, 9&8 alleged in the Complaint? Answer: __Yes 2, Did the defendant commit adultery Answer: _ Yes 4e as the plaintiff veen = 2onafide for more then six months prior to the com Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY James Boyce tiayes VS. Frankie Marie This cause coming on to o€¢ for Court of Iredell County, Nort: Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury the Court ir avor of tne plaintilitl, records: sf matri- It is, therefore, svdered anc deferndante mony y heretofore existing between the ranted Frar = as an d ‘rarkie Merie Hayes, be, and the same are, dissolved, ™ absolute divorce from the defends te Moe 5453 Pa, ‘tuline S, Morrison ) DIVORCE V8. ( The Divorce — 'dell Morrison ) answers the issues submittec : we QtTIDER » COUR IN THE SUPERIOR 0 MARCH TERM, 1952 sanelled ° » duly sworn and empane —t ateel to tt as follows: PORTH CAROLIN i CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY’ “auline gs, Morrison rssvusE® VS. 0 del} vw “Orrisgon ) : re they now husbdan l. Did the plaintiff and g4efendant intermsrry, and aire y “d wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes AA6 IN THE SUPFYRIOR couRT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 2 Did the plaintiff and defendant Separate and live Separat ¥ Separ © and ap art from each other, and fave they lived separate and anart from each oth F id er for " more than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? 2e as the plaintiff been a oonafide resident of the State >f Nort oe “9Pth Cano. lings »Y ior t iY S 5 ths . a9 * “ r more ix months prior to the commencement of thig SCtion? 4 “¥iOn' nswers: Yes . ms » 2 o a ¥ : f > 1 YT T t i re i a 7 y y an - 4 L WO 1647 4nd Jein ne rd ib t , r 0 4 mm 9 Go wo oer avi ) "tT J I Ga G' ; r ,e e £ gy u 4 4 ad ~ , ) { *O ; i v . 7 2 a AY 13 a 610 mJ Z \ i ] os“ 9 4O4 re tei mons + 0 ; 28 ‘ e nr ty € E ac » 4UUVLe , J Us Yoo * >», ¢ 7 ~ ee T Nis, vurys, and the Jury havine ans we ; ‘ “5 answered the issues symt} ed to it by AvZVyibl UU av 4 = I 1 VOY f t ] Ss fs 4 ‘ ] ‘Lil, and against the lefendant, 48 set out in the ‘ ' J Jeer t é y 94 4 4 ; ? ‘ f laintiff, Pe tline S. Morrisgsor » 4nd the defend + CA,i\A ai + Vii? vy Jdel } »r’ y ana ; ily J 4riG ne Same ar Scan? ri £ ’ 4 vame are dissolved, ar the plaintiff is granted Zed V. Netiles Judge Presiding a anita Pe | 28 lise 7 reeman = ) DIVORCE a ! : 7 i© $ ; _ Tiine . a " ‘ne Div or ce Jury #1" Beine du ly sworn and empanelled ‘SWers the issves submitted to it as follows: Atay C y IN THs SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TiRM, 1953 1¢ ] uisge “ Ta i reeman 9 VS. 0 ISSUES ‘ reemay ) : se di t 1 ee ee ee ‘ oo" ANG the defendant intermarry as alleged in the com F : ; Answer: Yes ranean ce si aveé laintifre ane : w@ the defendant lived separate and apart for tw ~Mned lately Sceedinge the iy 11g commencement > f' this action? veen & resident of the State of North Carolina for Aine 44 AG UNE commencement of th.s action? IN THE SUPERIOR Court MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March th, 195% " yoRTH AK OLI NA I Trp, i RM, 1954 IREDELL COUNTY [ARC = +. iattie Louise Hall Freeman VS. ‘ JUDGMENY James Freeman 0 This cause coming on to be heard at the reculsar Man z 3 tren, 1953 Term of Superior Court for Iredell County, North varolina, and being heard befare +} } I f ira e re tne unc eT} ts Ace Presid In , 9 ad 2 x a Rn tha Rs. om a signed Judge Ss > ar jury an he jury hoving answered the faliawin. as, ha >; lssues as indicated and as appear in the r cord, viz: Tg 4 "hoe a *nt . 4 4 . l. Did the plaintiff ana the def nt nNtCrYrmarry as alle-ad thm sanam nia int? Answer: Yes siantaalelage a niciaiimasities 2 ve thea 1a 4¢ ri ; ne t } . ~ u mt u rat ‘4 4 4 i r two years immediately preceeding the commence: lis .cti Answer: Yes ila de Has the plaintiff been o resident of the <4 rt? Carolina for mre than six months rext or: ceed!) t 5 neement f tnis act ? Answer: Yes comeinaieciaamiinicneintiai It is, Lnerefore, ordered, adiu cree e bonds 9 trimony heretofore existing between the rlaintife a lant e end they are revoy ) - “ 4 hd Ao i A i , ‘ . i¢ ~“J»9 dissolve ‘ - 4 £ ] dis ed ar t the plainti be f Y » “ranted lut ‘ce rom the defer nt ve Zed V. Nettles corre anne Pe Jud esiding % % & ta ee a tt brn 4 vy annie ; rr WT MBE ines ) DIVORCE - ve, 0 The Divorce J y 1" ‘ luly sworr nd ine Lad NY 4. Joines § emswers the !ssues submitted to it as follows: far VAS JLINA, LLL COUNTY MARCH } , 195 3 .. Did the plaintiff and the defendant itntermarry Pf « } aw he + é. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they te ana j Md apart for period of two years or more as alleged in the Answer Yes Cusemememanen State of North Carolina for 4+ Has the Plaintiff been a resident of the 8n six months next oreceding the filing of this Complaint? 4nsSwen Yes ee neeateneteneD | AAS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Morday, March 9th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 SUPERIOR COUR IREDELL COUNTY yoRTH ¢ AKO LINA IN THE Supepy MARCH TERM, 1953 IREDELL COUN TY Annie Mae Jotnes ( L, Tucker, y Q whe batt J U DG MR N . } = a VSe N 7 } lony Le Joines ( Wil » WN T i : Anna Belle Tucker Es +mis cause coming on to ve heard and eine heard } a C fi 1 aT) Bil E 5) rd at the Ms h | og Warch Lerm 195 ri o ’ 4 o a oe 2 ; . } 4 , 93 This cause com ng on ts 36 heard ay eine heanad at this Term of tr 4 Supertlor Court of Irede?’ County. bdef'an 3 cn 77 low : ee eae MIs term of 1€@ suverior y C redell County, vefore His nonor, 4ed V. Neti les, Judge Presias = ‘ ‘0 i r F 7 A \ J } | i . as es ie oa 2 ding, Court, of Iredell County, Yorthn 3451 ina, before His Honor, Zeb VY. Nettles. Jua- v ? ’ in Che sur’ iayV in f answered a) L the issues submi ; ted ' . it . ™ vw ae | e ALA 'e sed & > & b} rs 4 n the fayop Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury hay?; answered the issues submitied ‘ } — ; , : ‘ . oo ¥ a Vee ASSUES Suo bLed to t 4 tne 2 inti and arainst the deferc an aca. lf" om = . oe ™ Ne 3 rerdant, as fully apnears in the record; — } 1 if : , the Court in favor of the plaintife a a7ainst the defendant, as set sut ?; the 7 @ tien noanan a . , “ oe “9 4 v yah ' 4U 418, theretore, orders +9 &Ajuased ana decreed that the onds of ma tri we UPL mony records: , cu are € Ly CW 2r l i} y . ¢ e1 ntiif efendant be, ay t} ’ 7 Le gg Ye ie . ‘ vane are, It is therefore, ordered and adiud-ed oy the ec ' @ donde of a f ii< roa e laintire . , , ‘ va / ag i matri- ’ + Ne} Ao€ y* en ° a * 1 y 8osolutb. Livorce fron the h + ics ee kh acs Sines - — . . ‘ | | ul ony heretofor: VALSUING Oetwesan the nila»: CLits e he svcrer, e de! nt, , e ba . Anna Belle Tuc} ‘Ty OC, and they are hereby Jissolv 1, and € laintiff is ranted * , i. . ‘ce an absolute divorce from the def'e; lant, a Zed V. Netiles J eo ¢< residty z eee naa ees aia ~Y. 208 o~— Todire : a“ < @ % % % tute x ; 2 ‘ f % 5019 el] ! ree dgury #1" Zeing duly sworn ; empanelled ve Campoell, Q Jury sworn and ¢ nelle 8 follows: J. S. Ckywelder, - a : @ - e J i i 4 J i eV t - er 0 rs the ues susmitied to it as follows: a Q French Holmes, L. 4. rnes, hk. 4. Arthurs, L. '. Crawe ; Plaintiff 0 ford, i. 9. mpson, Re Me Cs ell, W. FP. Sost, Mrs, . IN Ss TOR CORT 0 Vivian D, Llkinson, Loutse Wi] elm, Ralpt - Shuford, F i V8. 6 anda Tack ster eS i Oc V Asta ‘ u . 4 i int as 4 A ; cker mares Lymm Grinkley 0 oO @ ct ><> Wi 4 oe C ct o © "s <_ l6lendant inte ‘arry, and are they now husoand iefendan t? Answer; $300.00 i ers Yes ecaeetannenenns heen —_---— ° ld i lintiff ana a ss intvift ~' naant separate and live senarate and apart NORTE Lina I tha VA J LA - ’ ee i ‘ ¥ “ nr : ‘ 7 = ra part from each other for more IREDELL cow TY two ; nud } ’ § : oly institution of this action? * &. Camp ell Q ’ " * vy . | . ° ié6és ea a? s , ene Palintir¢ ( . a bona fide resident of the State of North Catt ‘ ) mam — JA L LCE . a6ent 9 wid vis F Vs, ) . | 4 Ty th ar ‘ . i ‘ 9 0 Yr t9© th miencement of this action’ "les Ly nt {f this "8 Lynr r lev } v r e s ri an a ) tates ef Nn }° S 0 a) naanraA hafor His Honor Zed V alia “his cause coming on to ve heard and being heard before His Honor Zeb V. Cltles, ot 4 ty Superior Court; and it appeam pos ene Warch 1953 Term of the Iredell County n ‘ ‘ ae nand q the 9 day sf the court that a tnd ment vy default and inquiry was rendered on tne 7 ‘ap s eee sut ‘’?ch, 19 2 ‘ Mas a ‘ ‘ One ae following 499) e h 4 Mig been SU0- 77“) 1N Lavyor Of the rlair tiffs and tné Mitte *. ‘d to the Jury and having been answered by them as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday March 9th, 1953 and recover of What amount, if any, is wae plaintiff entitied to recover of the derendants Answer? 300. 00 ts ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plain yy f*, 4 e therefore, it tHEt hove Now, the sum of $300.00 dollars, tozether with the costs ctione tay of March, 19536 Zebd V. Nettles Pw _ uage Presiding, March Term, Iredell County n Superior Court —— jeber, James srotnerton, Har hepler. oe v7 heard before His Honor, Zeb + ne Iredell County Superior Yount; and inguiry was rendered on {issue of the plaintiff; and the following - c¢ # i Ww ; to the having been answered by them as $0130" if the defendant’ vy «Lf any, is ti aintiff entitled to recover of Answer: $500.00 ee ee at 6 rf have iow, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plainti recover of the de this osts e defendant the sum of $500.00 dollars, together with the ° ction. This 9th dey of March, 1952, Zeb V. Nettles Yudge Presiding, mare urt Iredell County Superior Co zene RE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 IN dury sworn and emoanelled as follows: J. S. 2lack- welder, Franch holmes, F. C. ‘cAuley, H. 4. Arthurs, L. R. Crawford, i. 9. Thompson, RK. M. Campbell, W. | Bost, Mrs. Viviar WLlkins: Louise Wilhelm, Ralph H. Shuford and Jack - iuie ¢, Ge Hutes , intiff vs. Hazel Chandler Nichols, MS = Defendant. <D<OroocoocoOoOoOo What damage is the Hnleaintifft yer: $300.00 i yORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ¢, C. Huie, Plaintiff VSe Ws, Hazel Chandler Nichols, Defendan te ee ee ee a ct O THIS CAUSE coming on a Jury, of Iredell County; and 4t apr wiry in th’s cause was rendered Court of Iredell County empanelled as Raloh Waugh, J . . . Tam e er, vu Cs Jury sworn and Jlankenship, d- h Dick Kiroall, James he 9 Z. Ve. Brotherton, Banks Brown, Ve JuDdpGamM ce affines ult and inquiry The judgment of the Clerk in this cause +s affirmed by defa t by { the judgmen — appearing to the Court that defendant after the rendition of d hi ; ntending that he ha defay ¢ Court conten me and inquiry in this matter appealed to thi Pts *.16q a answer herein; ' Attorney for de- The Court finding as a fact that the snswer made bY — r verified yerified or signed b ” torney ° fendent was the At not in order and was not sf Preyer to RRR Pas : ; z : = = re Oo Ps nr eral ee Fen a an = — : = IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 by the defendant and tnat the same is not an enswer and therefore the appeal 1s dismissed. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court ry MARCH TERM, 1953 hat damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover the defendant? inswer: $ 500. 00 ral A 4 se coming on 9 G f f this term of Superior ning on -AY é Honor, Zed V. Nett ue Pre Lg and a jury, and the jury ; » bi 3 ne issues suomittec plaintiff and against e 17 fully set forth therefore ordered and adjudged for tne sum of Zeb VJ. Nettles Judge Presiding M LRG H LERM, 1953 Vilson Plummer my, 4 4 nerior This cause coming gl for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Sur +f C ¢ nat the Praintif! Court before the undersin Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the P a be none was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would pro- Suited, and it a: y oe] pesring that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appes secute this action: @ the It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, an seme is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff taxed with the costs. Zeb V. Nettles Vente tk eh This the 9th cay of warch, 195%, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TFRM, 1953 Mordey, March 9th, 1952 Plummer, Derendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be ersicsned Judge Presic vefore the unas - IT APPEARING to the Court i T Ai at the Novemver 6, 1952 term of th Judge Presiding, entered 4 nlea of Nolc Yansleughter end was senterced to jai of the State Highway and Public rks waich sentence was suspended an Taree Years, anc TT APPEARING that the srobation gs set forth in Ch year 1937, ar on or ” ~* ments; 0 Lefendant nas h oo . - 4 has chanted his the Provatior a+ g 0avion judgmen ABTY <Oy 1953 drunk and ‘Aata , ve 9 under Carolina heretofore nediatelye March, 19536 os - pote pee ee ee = — ee als Sie ee ee IN THE SUP ERI OR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 3 MAR CH TERM, 1953 MARCH TERM, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 Monday, March 9th, 1953 eee LL NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Aid6 5407 Q Jury sworn and empanelled. IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1953 gover De T4209 ' jilie O-« Tilley ) Juror withdrawn and mistrial ordered. Case Continued, earing to the Court that the defendant, Willie Lee Plummer, tendereg peas ee contender at the Novemvoer Term, 1952 to the crine ee SPE entence of 1% wr ming } +7 } me +h 6% ng ne OV ete tne said probation sentence and suspended judgment in the law and on the 26th day of Jan., 1952 was erly and on March 2, 1954 was again convicted axi and furth appearing to the Court that ticer this action incurred; sertence of 1 months to ve in to work under supervision of State Highway is hereoy ordered in affect and the issue commitment to issue thereon. vs Roxie Sh.ves Lazenby - -Continued Mabel Jones ~-----Continued --Continued oy Court for Defendant ixture Co. In x U nr for Defendant 4) liam vw kyrrecd ’ +? liliams vs Ernest avenpnort, David A. Floyd Adams -Con tinued ee 5 D aint2- A. Setzer--Continued for Plas Arc Ray Ele : ’ m ar a El | scar R. } T/A Mills — Electric Shor / ----Continued for Pleintit: Cornwall F Le - f ° 5 . . a - 8 bit. Electric Shor “= --Continued for Plaint-- , Sr. T/A Stonestreet Cafe vs ? TM e8dan March 10th, 1953» Honorable Court takes & recess until Tuesasy No. 537 Katherine vs m E Sloop 0 Juror withdrawn end m4 d na mistrial ordered. Case Continued. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Tuesday, Marth 10th, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes acc ording to adjournment on Tuesday Morning ‘ r ’ Merch 10th, 1953, at 9 20 o'clock A. Me The following men constitute wnat shall hereinafter be termed the "Divorce Jury #3" to-wit: J. S, “lackwelder, French Holmes, Ff. C. McAuley, EH. W. Arthurs, ‘+, 0. Thomnson, J. L. Wilkinson, W. P. Bost, Mrs..Vviian pD, Wi lein. Ralph H. Shuford, and Jack Feimster. ( DIVORCE ( The Divorce Jury #3" Being duly sworn and empanelled ) answers the issues submitted to it as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT > laintif‘’ and defendant married to each other as alleged fide res: of the State of North defendant lived t g and from each + the bringing of IN £HE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Stefford i } ¢ ei Zed Ve ause coming on to ve heard and seing he vefore his Honor, e358 ' ; . : Sean / 1 of Presiding and a Jury at the March Term of the Superior Court Nort} 14 : : at the de ty, North Carolina, and it urhter aprearing to the Court tha 7 Gs 1 en oy perso las been properly served with process, oy publication, and 2180 °F ! a gwer- } yr ‘ } + t and an é .E I Sé Vice, and the fol lowing issues having been submitted 9 he Jury: le. Were the 3 alleged in defendant married to each other 4 the Complaint? Answer: Yes. ; . : rth caro- 2, Has the plaintifr been a bona fide resident of the State of ” F in the lina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action, 48 alleged Complaint? Answer: Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR CoURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Tuesday, March 10th, 195% 5 defendant lived seperate and apart from . ther for two years next preceding the bringing of tnis action, as alleged Ou " Complaint? Answer: Ye@S-e NoW, THEREFORE, on Motion of Fletcher, Attorney for tiff, it 18, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND CECRFED and declered that the marriage contract enter- ed into between the plaintiff and defendant, ve, and it is, hereoy declared dissolv- ed, and the nlaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, louis Lester Stefford. And it is further ordered that the to be taxed oy the Clerk. This the 10th day of March, 1953. 4 No, Sy8h ¥ Ww 2} VOR Herbert M. Sharpe DIV RCE ; i and emp: vs The Divorce Jury # Being duly svorn a " £ cad s3% fo ws: Juanita Sharpe answers the issue ORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY Herbert M. Sharpe vs Juanita Sharve l. Were the rla Answer Yes 2. Has the plaintiif been lina for six months next preceding A armswer: Yes 4 4e Have the plain for two years next ANS Wer: Yes RTE CAROLINA RRY\GT tr MAT H IREDELL COU NTY MARCI ‘erbert M, Sharpe vs ) ‘Uanita Sharpe ) H Ve 4 ' his Honors Zeb This cause coming on to be heard and veing he rd vefore ia | ; » Superior Court 0° - en, Judge Presiding and a Jury at the March Term of the 3 ! t that the defendant ha el) County, e Cour North Carolina, and it appearing to the vy publication, and also by a and enawered by the | personal acceptance 08en | Mperly served with process, of hmitted an Service, g been suoMm and the following issues havin Jury; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1H ree Sy oe MARCH TERM, 1953 MARCH TiRM, 19 Tuesday, March 10th, 1953 Tuesday, March 10th, 1953 1. Were the plaintirf and defendant married to esch other as the cost of the action to ve taxed by the Clerk. alleged i n HUREFORE, OKDEKED, ADJUDGED, AND DECI the Complaint? ; THEREFORE, ORDERED, AD ’ DECR ED, ad + by and with the corsent of 4 “er SC! e - defean he ) Answer: YeSe that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sg f On 7 q ) the varties, um of One Thousand, non ine Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Caro two Hundred, Fifty-8ix Dollers and Fifty-Four Cents, ($1,256.5h), together with 3 lina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action, as alleged in the : terest thereon at the rate of six ver cent ner annum from November 28, 1950 until . + he a t 4 ¢ } ) rave ~~ “ho Complaint? together with the cost of the action D€ xe y the Cle paid, Answer: YeSe Entered end filed in the office of erk of Suy of Iredell 2 Have the rlaintiif an: ‘aioe — ts Mar 0 4, 1 defendant lived sevarate and apart from e: County, North Carolina, this March 10, ars next vreceding the bringing of this action, as alleged a Si de i 2 260 Ve. Nettles 223 V. NNTTLES, Judge Assigned and Holding Courts in the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina. the plain. Consented to: Adams, Dearman & Winverry Ttorneys for Flaintiff iage contract ene : - Je G Lewis iefendant, ve, and it 1 hereoy declared Attorneys ior DLelencant rsranted an absolute divorce from the defend NORTH CAROLINA Juanita Sharre. IREDELL COUNI en : i aia aii olmes bos 5275 f dues_encen ed enpanehine 48 Ee Pe dost McAuley, He Ww. artnurs ~e Weel ee —— cS cs e Shuford, J: ; = ii > + J. Je Kiser, And it is further ord L. B. Skeen ) Q ) vs *Iarnly 6a 0DK James W. Atwell Zeb Vv. Nettles ] James a. Atwell udge Presiding ‘ 0 ylaintiff's in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Did the nlaintiff contribu the c@efendants? ver: Yes. What damage, Answer: t eer 4 o HFAFD, and »eing heard before His Honor, Zeb ¥ fas the property of the cr ’ ny + T 5 of : neg - 3 7 ne 2 YY 9 I an iolding Courts in the Fifteenth Judicial District f the nleintifrf? ; for awaws rolina, and it a pearing to the Court that this action was instituted swer: Jam we Atwell er titled - Four i ‘ 4 tt defencant, uv the recovery of the sum of One Thousand, Six Hundred Fifty-Six Dollars and Fifty If so, what amount of damage +s the . per % recoy ; ; Cents, ($1,656.54), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent | ver of the plaintiff? . , the wer: annum from Novemoer 28, 1950, until paid, »ased upon an open account between Answer: ned « satis partics; and it further appearing to the Court that the parties have reac matters factory agreement about the cause of action, and effected a settlement of all , ; he and things arising, and as set forth in the pleadings; that by the terms of t Hund- settlement, the rlaintiff is sand, Two to have and recover the sum of One Thou mep e : st red Fifty-Six Dollars and Fifty-Four Cents, ($1,256.54), together with intere 4d thereon at the rete of six seal 2 per cent per annum from November 28, 1950» unt Sota a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Tuesday, March 10th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Le B. Skeen, Plaintiff VS. W. Atwell, and W. Atwell, Junior Defendants This cause coming on to Court for Iredell County, North e Presiding and a jury, and Juds , 2 the nlaintiff's action in favor to it on the cross act 7 and ine Cause having come on A hr . rb ’ . ed by counsel, the Court, sfter considering the allegations arcument of counsel concluded ie) —— that said paragraphs should be striken am IN TS SUPERIOR court MARCH TERM, 1953 be heard at the Regular March 1954 Term of Superiop Carolina, and being heard Lefore the undersigned the jury having answered the issues submitted on 9f the defendants and having answered the issues fon of the defendm t, James Atwell, in favor fs) TyTanr Aya ay lly appears records: and decreed that the plaintiff have ‘gs action and that lefendant have his cross action. the yefore His Horor, Zeb V. Nettles, upor _— ' the »f the Superior Court, and it ap earing t0 i ons ause filed written Motion to strike Paragrat sons stated in the Motion. gont- to be heard and all parties having been repre sf the Complaint en¢ e of plaintiffs be permitted to amend their Complaint so as to set out such ome ‘ 4 f we + } * ction as to their counsel may seem proper. a 8 be, yen thit es 4 Lt 1S, therefore, Irdered and ‘fecreed that Paragraphs 5, by 7 an and the same are hereby striken from the Complaint. The plaintiffs are 31 sta ty days to file an amended Complaint in this cause. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1954 Tuesday, March 10th, 1953 The cause of action is remanded to the Clerk of the Sunerior Court uiing of further pleadings in the ceuse, This March 10th, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Judare Pres ial ng e ng RY +t ionorable Court takes a recess O'clock A. M. « until Wednesday Morning, for t March llth, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Wednesday, March llth, 1953 March llth, 1954, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. INo. 521 IREDELL COUNTY Pp, S. West, J. Roscoe West, R. C. West, Re F. West, and S. E. West, T/A West Realty Plaintiffs JUDGMENT VSe —_- / r a Iutner 0. Hawkins, T/A Hawkins Super Drug Store, oO This cause coming on to od a v erring to the Court from the stxtement of counsel that all + - ta , ~1% £ } ~~ 7 . y a } . “ ‘ . , ~~ } } > controversy set out in the plesdings have beer freed upon by the the > fendan t as artreed to avy to the plaint accent the sum of Ine Hundred Dollars ($100.00) and the costs of thi Baxter HB. Finch Attorneys for Plaintiff LAND, SOWERS, & AVERY T . Ward, Jr. {OL Attorneys for Defendar ‘ IORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUP:RIOR © Viiller, Plaintiff vee ORDER 1. Banks Culp, Def'endan t co__.UcocCOolUCeCOlC OS . aa NORTH CAROLINA IN Ink SUPERIOR COURT heard and being heared before His |} les, Judge Presiding at the March term of tne Superior Court of i THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and scing heard before the under s fi motion of the defendant for an Order requiring the vlaintiff to make more de and certuin the provisions of raragraph 9 (b) of the Complaint of the pl This sonoravle Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morn! , ng, jonor, Zeb V, redell County matters of rties, and that Siff and the plaintiff has agreed to action in l accord isfuction thereof; He 5 ‘TY , , : 4 : a + + | Now, therefore, vy consent, it is ordered, adjud;ed, and decreed thet the mane nn) plainti! ve } recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ) RT signed ' , ‘ . upon Judge Presiding at the March Term of the Suner‘or Court of Iredell Gou ty uP nite aintiff and IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Wednesday, March llth, 1953 emma f ee oe : : Paw pa , hearing arguments of the counsel for the plaintiff and for be tne Court, after > ' iff and for t} [se gant, veing of the opinion that such Motion ought to be allowed; fen ’ NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDURED: 1, That the plaintiff be and ne hereby Is ordered to serve upon the defendant } g to file an amendment to his Complaint within ten (10) days from the signing here- an 4f getting forth the portions of his head an yody which he alleges to have been in tured in the collision mentioned in the complaint, the nature of the injuries which he avers he has sustained to those portions of his head and JIAY, AY the particular ! 7 } 9 aya " Si) ted Y wil e S\ in ‘ TT ine?) , Sa 3 Lv injuries wiich he avers have resulted or will result in permanent disability. L 2 The defendant shall have thirty (30) days from the service >of such Amend. ’ . Vv amt in which to answer or yatherwise »lead. 7 7 1 2 a yr f Ve ‘ir 7 C2 : This the llth day of March, 19556 | ‘I } A Zen \. ttles * ww ——Judsze Presiding "9, 5401 (RTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNT lester Jordan, Executor of is D. Murphy, deceased. a a . Se White cause coming on to ve heard vefore Ais + ry ‘residing at tne sarch Term, 1953 upon amended comnla int . ve It is now ordered that the lainti! ment of this term file an amended complaint in this cavse. This tne llth aga y of March, 19536 7 Oe aiititnllaiecanienon 460 . WOU eee Awa Pres 1 JUG ti > * or ond declares r rmits th le- r {cation 28 i iiscretion withdraws The Court in its discretion nares a mistrial and co! ttnues the case arm ae A ar we and fendant to file an amended answer required by Statute. = 2 @ Lo "3 . t t ~ cT a ~ oe ooaCO: mo SS IN THE SUPFRIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 Wednesday, March llth, 1953 IN THE SUPEKIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1953 At Wednesday, March llth, 1953 a NORTH C AROLINA, IN THE SUrkiiaR CoURD Fe The Court on its own motion continues this matter to the May Term 1953 a | 7,’ VW Y Rl IREDELL COUNTY. Hh Clarence L. Little 0 ad aii ear | 1 ; iredell County Superior Court, and the defendant {s ordered to aprear tn thts Court | = 0 ORDE rv M 8 at 10 ofclo f a ny A ER on Monday, May 18, 1953 lock A. M. at Statesville, lorth Carolina, to obey i 1. » Manns ‘ || Trene Vorrison Little ( and ai de such further orders as the Court may make in this ceuse || ae ee les Wat [This cause coming on to be heard before His honor Zeb V. Nettles, Jua Ne » Judge a: ; , wa ; This cause and the matters set forth in this order are contin a a Ha |i Presiding, and a jury, at the March 1953 Term, and the Court hereby in its disere re continued to the Yay Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court at Statesville, North Carolina comnence tion orders that a juror be withdrawn and a mistrial declared; and ing on May 18, 1953 for further orders; and is in all respects retained vy the Court It is hereby ordered thut the defendant may within twenty cuys siter the for further orderse adjurnment of this term file an amended answer and cross action for divorce a shh + : This the llth day of March, 1953. mensa et thoro duly verified ir this cause. Zed V. Nettles udge presiding This the llth day of March, 1954. Zebo V. Nettles Judge Presiaing ‘no, 5462 +e eReSEeHReHeHeBAAA IN Ti RIOR COURT WORTH CAROLINA C {io. -97 Sen a oe IREDELL COUNTY MARSH YEAM, 1953 os ces een In the matter of the DELI NTY MARCH TERM, 1953 Custody of John Roger Murdock, age 5 and ooo moO em YW = reo Ruth. ives, Patricia Ann Murdock, Plaintiff, ' age 2, infents vee : CONTEMPT ORDER The avove entitled matter coming on to ve heard and veing heard efore the ¥ Larry Isborne Shives, ) uMersigned Judge Presiding at the Merch 1953 term of Superior Court of Iredell i &N nt. cae County according to law and being heard upon petition of Writ of Habeas Corpus in- This cause coming on to 0.e heard and deing heard by His Honor Zeb V. Nettles, stituted by the father John Roger Murdock, and the Court finding as # fact from L ,e Juce residiy ot + — - 7 . ie \ tf ] , Av Tne en erm ] 54 Iredel] Sounty Su erior Court, upon the ; 44 . * . eis man * » ft’ imacea evidence of testimony and investigation mace vy the Welfare Depertment ot trede] '' $ Ps Wh y presen _ mont ny Adama 7 : . . . , s nt } motion of Adams, Deerman and Winoerry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, Mrs. Ruth Snives, a : Annie Carson ft . , be te vounty, that neither the father, John Roger jurdock, nor the mother, a — 19 is now irs. Kuth Shives Pescock, to adiudge the defendant in contempt of court , | | 44 in . control of said children; Muna 1 : ss ar nur ock, are fit and suitable er sons to have custody and t oo | hy ~ natietna : : | | for wil L129 PEe,;VUSing, 1aid in 59 «6 neglectin ; to make the payme nts required by | L d It ts therefore adjudged that the said two children ove placed in the A th rders of tnis Court for the support of his minor child, Mary Elien Shives, 4ne m 3 aced iH ) Us tody of the Supt. of Welfare of ir dell County and that said children be | lacec 1 the Yourt finds: veliare O1 1 ~ | of si f Nelfare, shall be to ste | 1 such home or homes as in the discretion of said Supt. of Welf . i -~ lw + } eal * i " bts interest of said cnildren, and that the said father, Jonn Roger M rdock,y yi That the defendant has wilfully failed, neglected, and refused to meke the 7 | liegt I | | a pay into said Office of Supt. of welfare of Iredell County such amow payments wi.ich the Court ordered him to pay for t he support of his minor child, | | of the said childrene hn ma y be necessary for the support and maintenance Mary Ellen Shives ase ane ol y Ellen Shives, and the defendant is now in arrears on the payments which he This cause is retained for further orderse was 9 rdered to make yy the C yurt for in the sum of U he support of his minor child ons rT) : nig 9~ 11-534. I'wo Hundred Sixty-Five Dolls 626 — I ars (%265.00). Zeb V. Nettles = Tudge Presiding atte t ne gn 2 2 4% % e*e+ 2a % That the defendant is in wilful contempt of the orders of the court 1 i" he has wilfully feiled, vefused, and neglected to make the payments which he was ordered to make by the Court for the support of his minor child; and that he * de wilfully in arrears without lezal excuse and justification in the sum of Two Hu red Sixty-Five Dollars ($265.00). IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1954 Wednesday, March llth, 1954 Jury sworn and empnnelled as follows: Die, Kim ‘ VY. Brotherton, L. Re. Crawford, Har 1a R *e yall, H. O. Thompson, H. W. Arthurs, J. Le Wilictns vercash, Feimster, A. slunkenship, J. Ral») oe Jack he jsourd f Education Kiser and James K. Webver. MUSA, de dy lredel] County Iss plaintiff aid defendant enter into a in the complaint? ' ¥. ‘ yes s ile Sylvia B Hutchins vs “ichard Hutohings ----------------<-------- Continued Lucinda Sellamy ve Alfonzo Stevenson -----<-------- ecceeccce --Cont inued Arvel Dale Payne ve Clarence Morrison -------- eeceneceseeces --Cont inued R M Kabrick vs W F Mackey - Cont! nued WW Goodrum vs Vera Loretta Goodrum - Cont inued John Plain & Co vs DW Scott T/A Mooresville Bakery ---------~ Continued Lucille M Ervin va Minnie Campbell & Isaac Campbell C A Ervin ve Minnie Campbell & Isaac Yampvell Herold Lee Jordan vs Hattie Speer Wilson ---------------------Cont nued Germann-Compton Motors, Inc vs Sam A Srowm & Lorene “rown --Cont inued Donald Lackey ve Frances Morrison Lackey Seeeneoeee onacecenaee” Cont inued yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ALEXANDER COUNTY e L, Summers - Plaintiff -vs- JUDGMENT Glenn Summers Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding and a jury at the Septemoer Term of the Superior Court of Alexander County, and it appearing to .he Court that the defendant has been properly and personally served with process, and the following issues having been suomitted to and answered oy the jury: l. Were the plaintiff md defendait married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes" 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for eix months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes" 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the brimging of this action? Answer: "Yes" NOW THEREFORE, on motion of Ray Jennings, Attorney for the Plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged, and declered that the marriage entered into between the plaintiff and defendant is hereoy declared dissolved and the plaintiff is granted ® absolute divorce from the defendant. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 27 day of Septemer, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink Taare Presrain a North Carolina Alexander ounty I, Charlie R. Watta, Clerk of Superior Court, do hereby certify the acove Judgment is « true and correct copy as 4t appears on record in this Office. Orded invivil Judgment Yocket, Sook "g" page 128, che 12 day of Oct. 1951. Charlie R. Watts —wierkoSuperior Coureé t Of Iredell County, N. Ce Witness my hand and official Seal this Filed in the office of the “lerk Superior Cour * 10th day of March, 1953. Joyoe Dobson puty Clerk “uperfor Your on th eceenvvaeveseee® <= = es en 5 ee cS No. 528 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR Court BEFORE THE CLERK Arvel Dale Payne t Plaintiff —> CONSENT JUDGMENT Clarence Morrison, Defendant $ This cause coming on t» be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court, and by consent of all the parties and their Counsel, it is agreed that the Plaintiff shall recover jud;ment of the Defendant for the sum of Two Hundred Twenty ($220.00) Dollars for his damages as alleged in the Complaint; md that this is a compromise settlement of all matters and differences existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendm t. THEREFORE, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff recover of the Defendant the sum of $220.00 with interest from April 1, 1953, until paid; that the defendant recover nothing on his counterclaim; that execution shal) not issue on this judgment prior te April 1, 1953. The Defendant is taxed with the cost of this action. This the 9 day of March, 1953. C, G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Consented to: R, A. Hedrick orney r e ain R, A. Collier mey for e endan * aeneanenen ena ana av 2 40. 5463 forth Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County , Weaver bahia Me Mee pleintift vs JUDGMENT Rn. D, Wells and pria Wells as Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before tie Honorable, C.G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, upon the motion of the Plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and sumone issued in this action on the 40th dey of January, 19533 And it further appearing to tie vourt that said summons together with a copy of said compla nt were served on the defendant, R. D, Wells on the 41st of January, 1953, and said summons t» rether with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant, Zenobria Wells on the 7th day of February, 19533 And it further appearing to tie Court tuat no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleading has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified compleint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay @ sum of money fixed by said contract, namely, the sum of Thirteen Hundred and no/100 the 5th day of July, 19533 @llears ($1400.00) with interest thereon from that the pleintiff have Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed sum of Thirteen Hundred and No/100 dollars, tnd recover of the defendant the "ith interest thereon from the 5th day of My, 1952, ad the costs of this action, This llth day of March, 1953- Cc. G. Smith Clerk of tue Superior Court eS “Se ae got ae Pte =e bir Oe ant gett Ft ae tee: a AW = pi Se ee oc = aS as See (NO. 5448 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. Tae Parker Pen Company, 0 Plaintiff, , Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT R. E. Cook, 0 Defendant. ' This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this léth day of March, 195%, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Yaurt: ole That on January 10, 1953, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. o2= That summons was issued from this Court on January 10, 1953, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. -3- That the summons was served on the defendmt by M. Maness, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on January 10, 1953, by leaving with the defendmt ® copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. “ly That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed oy lew for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no snswer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. -> That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands @ sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement ofthe defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized verified statement, marked "Exhibit A", was attached to, md made ®@ part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the Gave of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the transaction. -6- That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked “Zxhivit A", that ” @ defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of th merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhicit A", the #8 * four Hundred Eighty Dollers and Five cents ($80.05), together with interest thereon at the rate of sic per cent per annum from September 20, 1953, until pads I? IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, RE. Cook, the sum of Four Hundred Eishty Dollars and Five Cents ($480.05), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per gent per ennum from Septempoer 20, 1952, until paid, together with the cost of this action taxed by the Court. This the 16th day of March, 195%. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior vourt of lredell County Ban ueeaneun Bueeeree eee ‘Noo 5436 WORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Miss Frances G. Nicholson, Plaintiff Va. JUDGMENT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Ira L. Sneed and wife Eula M. Sneed, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard, and being hearc before the Honorable Carl G, Smith, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons in the above entitled action was 4ssued on the 17th day of December, 1952; that service could not 06 had on the defendants, Ira L, Sneed and wife Eule Mm. Sneed, for and because they were and are non-residents of the State of North Carolina, and it further appearing to the Court that summons was 1952, and endorsed by the Eula M. Sneed, were not to be S aff of Iredell returned on the 17th day of Decemver, - County, that the defendants, Ira L, Sn ed and wife, found in Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that an affidavit was filed that the defendents were not in NorthCarolina, and that they were none and that service of summons wife Evle M. Sneed. b uo lication Presidents of the State of Virginia; .* has been had upon the defendants, Ira L. Sneed and Court that a warr the seizure and attachment of f attachment was And it further appearing to the os 9 tssued on the 18th day of December, 1952, order ing seine un *ertain real property owed bythe defendants, and located in Iredell County» : State of = North Careding, ant more particularly dese ‘ibed as follows eee <P EE es I ET 7S a Lap ee nN a RIE "Beginning at the iron steke on the West side of Hill Street, in the Southeast corner of the Salley-MacKesson property; thence with the Sal ly-Mackesson line N 7h W 21) feet to an iron stake; in the Sally-MacKesson corner; thence § 17 W 100 feet to an iron stake; thence S 7) E 222 feet, more or less, to a stake on the West side of Hill Street; thence with the Western edge of Hill Street, y 2h E 100 feet tothe beginning, the same oeing the certain tract of land conveyed from the First Building and Loan Association to J. F. Woodfin and wife, Lelia L. Woodfin, by deed dated February 4, 1942, and recorded in Book 147, page 580, Iredell County Resistry;" That notice noticgof the issuing and of the return of the warrant of attachment was duly advertised in the Statesville Daily, once a week for four successive weeks, as required oy law; That the time for filing pleadings on the part of the defendants has elapsed and that no answer, demurrer or other pleading has oeen filed by the defendants, or either of t em; And it further apparing to the Yourt that the is an action brought to recover the sum of $410.35, plus interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the 3rd day of November, 1951, due the plaintiff by the defendants, on an alleged contract woereby the plaintiff performed services in her capacity as a real estate agent, handling the real estate affairs of the defendants, and that the plaintiff from time to time advanced money to pay the defendants obligations to the Merchants and Farmers Bank, of the City of Statesville, in oehalf of the defendants, as their real estate representative. Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover judgm@™mt against the defendants, Ira L. Sneed, md wife, Bula M, Sneed, for the sum of $410.35, together with the costs of this action} that the attached property be sold by the Sheriff of Iredell County, as in case of execu tion, and that the net proceeds of said sale be paid into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court in order that said net proceeds may be applied % -” satisfaction of the foregoing judgment, either pro tanto, or in full; that any surplus over and aoove the amount of said judsment, namely $410.35, together with the costs of this action, rema’n in the office of said Clerk for the penefit of the defendmts, Ira L. Sneed, and wife, Sula M. Sneed. And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this judgment shall t be operative only to the extent of the net proceeds from the sale of the propert] en attached of the deferdants, Ira L, Sneed and wife, Eula M. Sneed, which has be end that this judgment shall not operate as a personal judgment against a defendants or either of them. This the 16 day of March, 195%. C, G, Smith erk oO @ Superior Cour *2aniuktee#aaeaesBenue /NOe 51486 yoRTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY, 1, E. MoNeely and J. L. McNeely, Plaintiffs, In the Super ior Court Before the Clerk Vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT fallant Transfer, Inc., Defendant. Tais cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before ©, G, Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court fom the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, that all matters and things arising in this action and growing out of the accident which occurred on the 21st day of January, 1952 on U. S. Hizhway No. 6East of the City of Statesville, North Carolina, when a truck omed by Tallant Transfer, Inc., and/or ‘allant Transfer Company, Inc., and the truck of the plaintiffs were in 4 collision, have been settled between the parties, and the plaintiffs have executed a full and complete release, and now desire to take a voluntary nonsuit: IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, OKDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winoerry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, that the plaintiffs be nonsuited, end this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costes of this action be taxed against the plaintiffs by the Clerk of Court. This the 18th day of Marcy, 1953-6 C. G. Smith “Cissk-o? Superior Court of Iredell County, North Caroline ext <——? eee CONSENTED TO: ine, Dearman and Winberry, ttorneys for the Plaintiffs, oY: C. B. Winberr Member of Firm * 2s 2 2 2% 2 t eea2e2 222 * pence i = sae ene Oe wv NO. 5377 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Katherine D. Sloop vs. William E.Sloop This cause com-ng on to be heard before me, Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and the plaintiff through her counsel states that the matters and things therein involved have been settled: It is now, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action be and the same is hereby nonsuited. This 19th day of March, 1953. C.G. Smith Ulerk of the -uperior Court NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Ray Mackie T/A Mackie Lumber Company Plaintiff v3. Reba M. Fox, Admx of the estate of Clyde M. Fox, Reva M. Fox, individually, and W. V. Fox Defendm ts This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Caroline, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of attorney for the plaintiff that the plaintiff has elected to take a non-suit in this action; It is therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff oe non-suited and ve taxed with the costs. This 20 day of March, 1953. Cc. G, Smith <a Court Clerk of the Superior Your Consented to: Land, Sowers & Aver Attorney for Slatntt pera tac *e# eeeununeneucennanaaenenana® M0e 5,08 yortd CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Poole and E.D. Poole Plaintiffs clarence L. VS. Judgment of John Wesley Givins VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable ¢, @G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of attorney for the plaintiff that the plaintiff has elected take a non-suit in this action; It is therefore, ordered, adjud;ed, and decreed that the plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the costs. This 20 day of March, 1954-6 C, G,Smith Clerk of the Supe ror Court Consented to: land, Sowers, & Ave Titorney for SIeTHEUT *2 2 2 % 2% * sean euneuxuunenueezeeaaea®? hho, 5393 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Neil S. Sowers and Jessie S. Sowers tiffs ene JUDGMENT OF V8. VOLUNTARY NON-IT Home-Made ChairCo, Inc. and its Officers L. 0 G4) & . W.Gibsor, oson, M. B, Brosius This cause coming on to be heard and oeing heard vefore the Honorable % G Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Caroline, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of attorney for the plaintiff ‘hat the pla ntiff has elected to take a non-suit in this action; Tt is therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff oe non. Suited and be taxed with the costs. This 20 day of March, 1953. . G. Smith “cise of the Sap ator Court “onsentea tos k & surke, I, T. Avery, Jr. oy “. 1.Ward Jr Attorney for plaintiff aog@neeene eee NE A en aed a Se eee lwo. 5477 NORTH CAROLINA, ) IN THE SUPERIOR Cour? TREDELL COUNTY. ) G. & He HOSIERY CO., INC., ) -V8- 3 JUDGEMENT BARNARD HOSIERY CO., INC. ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before C, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County. The Court finds from statements made by Eddy S. Merritt, Attorney at Law of Hickory, North Carolina and being the plaintiffs attorney, of record; that all of the matters complained of by the plaintiff in its complaint duly filed in this cause have been satisfied in full; that the platntiff desires to take a voluntary non.suit: It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be, and it is hereby voluntarily non-suited at its re.uest and because of the matters hereinabove found to be true: ‘The property hithertofore attached and levied upon bythe Sheriff of Iredell County is hereby released from the levy of the said attachment md che Sheriff of Iredell County is hereby directed to deliver the said property to the defendant and or its agent, the Statesville Finishing Company. Issued, ordered, adjudged, and decreed this the 20 day of March , 195}. C. G.Smith erk o e lrede uper ior Vourt. — Yo. 569 NORTH CAROLINA IN TEE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL vCOUNTY Augusta Dry Goods Company, Ine. V8. JUDGMENT Mrs. Ruth Lackey t/a Fannie-Ruth “hop ee ee ee ee eet ee eee This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable & % Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon the motion of the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default finals And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 5th day of February, 1953; co And it further appearing to the Court that seid summons together with & COPy of the complaint were served on the deferdant on the 6th day of Februarys 1955 Ana it further appearing to the vourt that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed with the defendent and no extension of time to file pleadings pas been granted end that the time within which ti file pleadings has expired jad it further appearing to the Court from the verifiegéomplaint that the cause of action cons ists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of mney fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Seven Hundred Fifty Four and 38/100 Dollars with interest from the 7th day of August, 1952; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Seven Humdred Fifty Four and 38/100 Collars, with interest thereon from the 7th day of August, 1952, and the costs of this action. This the 21st day of March, 1953. Cc. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court fio. 5472 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County irs. Ruth G. German Plaintiff vs JUDGMENT E. L. Shoemaker Defendant ee ee et et et eet ee This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorabl of the Superior Court of lredell County, upon the motion of the Plaintiff for judgment against the defendmt by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed md fumons issued in this action on the 10th day of Feoruary, 19535 * And it further appearing to the Yourt that said summons together with ker on the PY of said complaint was served on the said defendant, E, L. Shoema jth day of Feoruary, 1953; other And it further appearing to the Yourt that no answer, demurrer, oF extension of time to file Pleading has been filed by the defendant and no e filed Pleading has been granted and that thetime wthin which pleadings may » has ®xpired; And it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by said contract, and the amount being the sum of Two Hundred Seventy-Five and no/100 dollars ($275) with interest thereon from the 14th day of April, 1952, and the cost of this action. This 2th day of March, 1953. Cc. G, Smith erk oO uperior Vour eFretrtririiriezeetPe PRR H EHH XS "Ww \No. 5348 NORTH VAROLINA, In the Superior Vourt IREDiLL VOUNTY. Before the Clerk Samuel ™, Frankel and Max | Frankel, a partnership, T/A Frankel & Company, Plaintiffs, Vs. | JUDGMENT QQ VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Julie's, Incorporated, Defendant. T his cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the under- Signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it ‘ appearing to the Court from the Statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, h Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and tnings arising in this action i! have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires tot ake a voluntary nonsuit: IT Is, ¢nwderURs, COs ERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, upon motion ot Adams, Dearmgn and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, tnat tne plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and tnat the costsd this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Vlerk of Vourt, This the 4th day of April, 1953. C, G, Smith 7 Clerk of Superior Cour of Iredell County, North Carolina CONSENTED TO: Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, BY: Monroe Adams RRR KKK RK KR Re Re OK me em IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 195 Monday, April 6th, 1953’ , yORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the APRIL TERM, 1953 County and State aforesaid on the 6th day of April, 1953, at 10:00 o'clock A, Me, when and where His Honor, George B. Patton, Judge, is present and presiding by appointment, as per the following Commission: "OFFICE Of THE CHIEF JUSTICE Or THE SUPREME COURT of the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA W. A. DEVIN CHIEF JUSTICE 10 THE HONORABLE GEORGE B. PATTON | One of the Special Judges of the superior vourts of North Varolina. GREETING: i WHEREAS, It has been made to appear to the satisfaction of the undersigned that the public interest requires that you hold the special one week term of the °uperior Court for the County of Iredell, veginning the sixth day of April 1953, for the trial of civil cases. WOW, THEREFORE, I, W. A. DEVIN, Chief Justice of the Supreme Vourt of the State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby find thet the public interest so requires and therefore 1 do hereby commission you to hold said ; f term of said Court for the County aforesaid, to begin on Monday, the sixth day 0 ‘April, 1953, and continue one week, or until the business is disposed of. | £ IN WITNESS WHBREOF, I have hereunto signed my name as Uhief Justice 0 the Supreme Court of North Carolina, on this eleventh day of March 195 3. of North Carolina . A, Devi - Lt Pat weet Justice oF the Supreme vourt | \ * Attest: John M, Stron Ministrative Assistant d Court by ind J.C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and opene order of the Court. Court the J.C, Rumple, High sheriff of IredellCounty, returns into open men to serve as jurors for “ames of the following good and lawful men and wo to-wit: ‘he April Special Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior Court, << IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «--- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Monday, April 6th, 1953 Mrs. W. P. Johnston Mack W. Sharpe Vharles A, Lippard Mrs Louise E. Barnhart A. S. Ballenger, Sr. T. J. Blide Marion Benfield W. G, Wilhelm R. B. Hudspeth Joe Ikall J. W. Kiser, dr. “iss Della Arnold Ira D. Hefner T, V. Bumgarner Pless Leonard Morrison J. W. Tarleton C. D. Wilson Mrs. A. L. Lowrance Jarvis Renegar S. S. Davis James Robert Atwell R. R. Marlin H. W. Honeycutt John E. Robertson Clyde F, Lindley Louis A. Stewart Vlaude W, Nillstead W. N. Ballard Walter D. Levan J. Wade Webb Edna Sigmon Ben A, Stimson Mrs. Kenneth Mayhew W. H. Allen B.H. Henderson C, L, Williams Mack W. Sharpe was excused by Statute. Mrs. Louise E. Barnhart wes in Rowan County. Marion Benfield was not served. Joe Ikall, Edna Sigmon, Mrs. W. P. Johnston and Vharles A. Lippard were excused by Vocotor's certificates. H. W. Honeycutt and R. B. Hudspeth were not returned. Walter D. Levan lives in South Varolina. T. J. +llis was deceased. Miss Della Arnold and Mrs. A. L. Lowrance were excused by the Court. The following men constitute what shall hereinafter be termed as the divorce jury #1" to-wit: Ira U. Hefner, J. W. Tarleton, Jarvis Kenegar, at, R, Marlin, Ulyde #. Lindley, W. N. Ballard, W. G. Wilhelm, J. 4. Kiser, Ue, T. V. Bumgarner, 3. S. Davis, Louis A. Stewart and Ben A, Stimson. ‘No. 54,07 Grover D. Tilley DIVORCE ‘ The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn 7 sada empane led answers the issues submitted to as follows: Ollie 0, Tilley North Carolina In the SuperiorCourt Iredell Vounty Grover D. Tilley j vs. j Issues Ollie 0. Tilley ' 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolin 7 more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes - wine THE SUPERIOR COURT FIR e-- APRIL SPECIAL TERM Monday, April 6th, 1953 a ane 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer’ Yes. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Grover D. Tilley | vs I Judgment Ollie 0. Tilley | This cause coming on to be heard before tionorable George Bb. Patton, Judge Presiding over theApril vVivil Term 1953 tredell County Superior Court, and being heard before said Honorable George 4. Patton, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted to the Jury: 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of tais action? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of uatrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be rorever dissolved, and the plaintiff, Grover D. Tilley, is hereby granted a divorce &@ Vinculo from the defendant, Ollie 0. Tilley, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk. George B. Patton — ize Presiding Ku Kk KK ROX Se RE ee Ce ee eR TF ~~ ears ~~ ” or » > oe - ‘ = ~ Sa OT pte a SS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -e- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Monday, April 6th, 1953 ‘No. 5419 vharlie A. Brown } DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sw vs | empanelled answers the issues oubaiteed ole as follows: Bertie Vaughn Hurley Brown North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County April Special Term, 1953 Charlie A. Brown Plaintiff vs ISSUES Bertie Vaughn Hurley Brown Defendant Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? answer: _Yes II Has the plainti:if been a bona fide resident of tne State of North Varolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? answer? _ Yes III Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next precedimg the bringing of tnis action? Answer: Yes North Carolina In the Superior Vourt Iredell County April Special Term, 1953 Charlie A. Brown Plaintiff vs Judgment Bertie Vaughn Hurley Brown Defendant This cause coming on to be neard and being heard before His Honor, Georg? B. Patton, Judge Presiding and ajury at the April Special Tern, 1953, of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty and it appearing to the vourt that defendant has been personally served with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in - complaint? Answer: "Yes." IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ==- APRIL SPECIAL TERN, 1953 1 Monday, April 6th, 1953 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived Separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer’ "Yes." Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and aecreed that the plaintiff, Unarlie A. Brown, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Bertie Vaughn Hurley Brown, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the vlerk. This 6th day of April, 1953. George Bb, Patton Judge Presiding we OK OK OK OK Om NO. 5475 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL COUNTY Betty Poovey Martin, | DIVORCE . j The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and vs empanelled answers the issues submitted to it | as follows: Newell Kester Martin WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Betty Poovey Martin , j ' Plaintiff “Vs- ISSUES Newell Kester Martin defendant | int? 1, Were the plaintiff and defendant married, a8 alleged in the Complaint: Answer Yes @. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each ether for t wo years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes ; for six 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North varolina +o Ronths immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Monday, April 6th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT April Term, 1953, Betty Poovey Martin, Plaintiff -VvS- JUDGMENT Newel Sester Martin, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, as appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, consiiered and adjudged that the bonds of marriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved ana set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. George B. Patton Judge Presiding we KK MK OK No. 5443 North Carolina, In the Superior Vourt, Iredell County. Robert A. Ball j vs JUDGMENT William James ‘ This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term ofIredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 7 day of April, 1953.6 Sone Pies Tore re) a ae ee a ee a ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Monday, April 6th, 1953 fo. 527 Daniel Lazenby vs Roxie Shives Lazenby ---------.-_-..____. Continued No. 542h Hubert W Blackwood vs Lois Laws Blackwood --~------.-..... « Cétkehins jo. 5473 Margaret Jones vs James Mi Jones s-------..-~...-.----.-. » teri No. 5474 Geneva Coleman Gragg vs Lewis Gragg --------~----.--..--. on Cine No. 5487 Marie Houston Owens vs Kalph Owens ----~-----------~-~-.-.. Cont inuad No. 5128 © F Moose, Admr of estate of Kalph G Moose, dec vs Southern Kailway Co & Thomas F Pardue, Jr, ------------.... Continued No. 5422 LC Miller vs A Banks Culp -------------------------------- Continued NO» 5060 Billie G Miller ~~ sworn and empanelled as follows: Tarleton, Jarvis Kenegar, Rk. R. Marlin, Vlyde F Lindley, W. N, Ballard, W. G. Wilhelm, J. W. Kiser, Jr., T. V. Bumgarner, S. S. Davis, | Louis A. Stewart, 4. &. Ballenger, Sr and James RK, Atwell vs Clyde Ray Randleman & Wm E Knight Pending trial of this case, the vourt takes a recess until Tuesday Morning. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Norming, April 7th, 1953 at 9:39 O'clock A. ines See rn te nt ase = cn EE - EE ERE ETI saben eile Ni ee Ma Fs oe Mae a ; IN THE SUPEXIOR COURT FIRST WEEK == APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Tuesday, April 7th, 1953 4 A86 om This “onorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning ? April 7th, 1953 at 9:30 o'clock A. hi JNo. 5060 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPEXIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. SPECIAL TERM, APRIL 6, 1953, Billie G. Miller, Plaintiff, { { Vs. ——— Clyde Wray Randall, { and William &, Knight, ! ! Defendants, 1. Was the Plaintiff injured and his property damaged by the negligence of the Defendants as alleged in the Compalint? ANSWER _ Yes 2. Did the Plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his injury or damage as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER No 3. What amount of damage is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the Defendants for his personal injuries? ANSWER _Four thousand five hundred dollars. 4. What damage, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the Uefendants for the injury and damage to his automobile? ANSWER Five hundred dollars 5+ Was the Defendant, William E. Knight, injured and his property damaged by the negligence of the Plaintiff as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER 6. What amount, if any, is the Defendant, William 4. Knight, entitled to recover of the Plaintiff for his personal injury? ANSWER 7- What damage, if any, is the Defendant, William E. Knight, entitled to recover of the Plaintiff for injury and damage to his automobile? ANSWER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Tuesday, April 7th, 1953 The Court wishes the minutes to show that Miss Lucy Dowell brought her class of boys and girls, the 6th grade of school, into court to observe the trial of a case. As they left while the Judge was charging the jury, Mr, ¥inberry went back and welcomed them on behalf of the Judge, congratulated them on the wisdom of coming. a a No, 5380 Lucille M Ervin vs Minnie Campbell & Isaac Campbel] m..-.--.. Continued No, 5381 C A Ervin vs Minnie Campbell & Isaac Vampbell] --............. Continued No, 5386 Harold Lee Jordan vs Hattie Speer Wilson -------.-.-.-.-..... Continued Mo. 5395 Arce Ray Electric Corp vs Oscar R Mills T/A Mills Electric Shop-Continued No. 5396 Cornwall Fixture Corp vs Oscar RK Mills T/A Mi lls Electric Shop-Von: inued Wo, 5406 O C Stonestreet, Sr i'/a Stonestreet Cafe vs The Traveler's Indemnity CO qweeemwenewnmnccncocnenwweccwccecncnecouccecececea( -ontinued ‘Mo. 5420 Jesse Fox vs Suma Fox onnnwccncnnnnccccccccencnencecccccccccccs Continued ‘SP 3589 Mrs L O Williams & vlyde L Williams vs Myrtle Williams & ste husband B F Williams <--<--------~-~----------.-~--~------------ vont inued ‘SP 3590 Mrs LO Williams vs Myrtle williams & BF Williams ------------ vontinued Vo. 5428 Zeb V K Dickson vs The Board of sducation of Iredell County ---Continued ilo, 5435 Donald Lackey vs Frances liorrison Lackey qncennen-ne enn nn ----<Cont inued This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, % 9330 O'clock 4 April 8th, 1953, e ie “4 187 W LATA IO TS 2 Rp nn SPS ena tae ee ee fe tite ea PEPE ERIE LED OTE ee ee See IN THE SUPERIOR COURT M8 FIRST WEEK ------ APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Thursday, April 9th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Wednesday, April 8th, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday morning This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Thursday Morning, ) April 8th, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A, IM. ipril 9th, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. ‘ "4 f Ho. 5008 " loaninger & ye |- Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: 4 troy P yosen ee Jettie O Cloaninger J. W. Tarleton, B. H. Henderson, R. R, Marlin q Jettie | viyde F Lindley, W. N. Ballard, W. G. Wilhelm’ || vs { J. W. Kiser, Jr., T. V. Sumgarner, S, S, Davis, 4 vs Louis A. Stewart, A. ©. Ballenger, Sr., and 4 Baker Foy P Brittain & Bugene Baker James Kk, Atwell. : . 4 ia P et. a T/* Brittain Lumber Co @ yr britta After the jury was empaneled and the pleadings read, it appearing to the Trial of said action resumed and continued through the entire day. Vourt that the juror, Marlin, nas sickness in his imuediate tamily and that it would be an injustice to require him to further serve in this case, and that counsel both for tne plaintiff and the uefendant agree that the vourt may ‘Ho, 5060 relieve the juror from further service in this case and stipulated that the WORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CuURT, trial may proceed with eleven (11) jurors, and that in case another juror should : IREDELL COUNTY. SPECIAL TERM, APRIL 6, 1953. become ill or incapacitated to serve, the trial may proceed with ten (10) jurors, Billie G, Miller, j and that the verdict of the remainins 1l or 10, as the case may be, will have Plaintiff, ! the same force and effect as the verdict or a jury of 12. Vs, i JUDGMENT The Vourt, therefore, withdraws the juror, R. R. Marlin, under the above Clyde Wray Randall, j stipulation and orders that the trial proceed in accordance with the stipulation und William E. Knight, | above set out. Defendants. | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor George 5. | | eeeeee 6 8 Patton, Judge Presiding, and a Jury at theSpecial Term, April 6, 1953, of the : h ! Superior Court of Iredell County, amd the Issues having been submitted to the ie. Sane Jury and answered by them as follows: : , of the North Carolina, In the Superior vourt, l, Was the Plaintire injured and his property damaged by the negligence | Iredell County | Defendants as alleged in the Complaint? | | ANSWER "Yes" | Lena Brooks Johnson j ee is injury or damage lt ¢ Did the Plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his snjury _ I JUDGMENT 1 a8 alleged in the Answer? | Charles Tolbert Johnson j ANSWER __ "ion f the Defendants | 3. What amount of damage is the Plaintiff entitled to recover 0 | | This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term ot Iredell Superior for his personal injuries? | | Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to tne Court that the ANSWER "$1,500 00" fendants for ! ' ecover of the Defendan | Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she 4. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled tor e ted to the injury and damage to his automobile? would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglec - “ ; : —"$500,00" _ the | appear and prosecute this action: . d+ Was the Defendant. William &. Knight, injured and ne property damaged by t ae Answer ! It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and Negligence of the Plaintiff as alleged in the AN same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. , SWER lili ont. entitled to recover ' e b, Anignl, This the 8th day of April, 1953. what amount, if any, is the Defendant, William ‘he Plaintiff for his personal injury? George B. Lea ANSWER ee eee This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, April gth, 195% at 9:30 o'clock A. M, : X yA Ne x IDOE Pitaddeldels C IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Thursday, April 9th, 1953 7, What d amage, if any, is the Defendant, William E. Knight, entitled to recover of the Plaintiff for injury and damage to his automobile? ANSWER That upon a motion to set the verdict aside relating to the third issue, the Court indicated to the parties that it would like for them to get together ang agree upon a figure satisfactory to both parties covering the damages for the personal injuries suffered by the Plaintiff; that as a result of the conferences between the parties, it was agreed that the amount of the damages the Plainirr suffered because of the personal injuries, should be Three Thousand rive Hundred Dollars ($3500.00) instead of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4500.00); that the Court was of the opinion that the amount of Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($3500.00) more nearly represented the damages suffered by the Plaintiff; and that such a settlement as agreed upon was for the best interest of all parties, NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Plaintiff have and recover of the Defendants the sum of Four Thousand Dollars ($4000.00), and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, Entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County, at Statesville, ‘orth Carolina, on April 9, 1953. George 3B. Patton : CEORGS B. PA: 10n, Judge Presiding Jonsented to: Vlaude Hicke J. G, Lewis Attorneys forthe Plaintift C. H, Dearman Ge He DEANAN, of the Firm of Adams, Deariuan, & Winberry Attorneys for the Yefendants This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, April 10th, 1953, at 9:00 o'clock A, M, Vs) Ni 2 i i as i a wa "4 IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST --- APRIL SPECIAL TERM Friday, April 10th, 1953’ ava This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Friday morning ’ April 10th, 1953, at 9:00 o'clock A. M. No. 5gL2 North eavensne, In the Superior Court, Iredell vounty. Hazel Russell Martin vS. JUDGMENT Samuel R. Martin This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, George 5. Patton, Judge Presiding, at the April Term of tie Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the Vourt that the plaintiff and defendant have agreed to a settle- nent of their differences whereby a separation agreement and contract have been entered into this the 10th day of April, 1953, between the parties hereto and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant has agreed to give, grant, convey, release, set over, and quit claim to the plaintiff, her heirs and assigns, all of his right, title, interest, and estate whatsoever including any right af courtesy in any estate whatsoever which he has, or may hereafter acquire, or become entitled to by reason of his marriage with the plaintiff in and to any and all real estate and personal property that she now owns or may hereafter acquire, and that the defendant has further agreed to give the plaintiff immediate possession of her homeplace property located at 213 S. vhurch Street, Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina, and a,1 household and kitchen furniture and fixtures located therein; that the defendant has furtaer agreed not to molest or threaten to molest the plaintiff, or her minor son, Basil 4. sussell, in any way Wiatsoever, and to not enter upon tiie homeplace property of the plaintiff. It is therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged: 1. That the defendant convey to tne plaintiff all of his right, title, t : e whatsoever interest, and estate including any right of courtesy in any estate w an - y his which he has, or may hereafter acquire, or become entitled to by reason of Marriage to the plaintiff in and to any and all real estate and personal property “Mat she now owns or may hereafter acquire. intiff I ssion of her 2. That the defendant give the plaintilt immediate possessio e and fixtures therein “unrntee property and household and kitchen furnitur y of Mooresville, Iredell County, l aad “sated at 213 S, Church Street, in the vit : in any way the 3. That the defendant not molest or threaten to molest 2 y Plaintitt or her minor son, Basil E. «ussell. he aforesaid homeplace property 4. That the defendant not enter upon t f the Plaintiff, IN THe SUPenkLOR CUURT FIRST WEEK --- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Friday, April 10th, 1953 5. That this cause be retained ror further orders with reference to the provisions ol this judgment. 6. That the defendant be taxed with the costs of this action, This the Oth day of April, 1953. George B. Patton Judge Presiding, x K KK OK Ke OK ‘No. 5098 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY TRUY P. CLOANINGER AND JETTIE 0. CLOANINCER | vs | ISSUES | FOY P. BRITTAIN & BUGsNE BAKER, T/A BRITTAIN LUMBER COMPANY 1. Have the defendants maintained and operated the lumber plant referred to in the complaint in such manner as to constitute a private nuisance, as alleged? ANSWER: No 2. If so, what special damages, if any, are the plaintiffs entitled to recover of the defendants for the period from July 9, 1948 to the date of the trial of this cause? ANSWER North Carolina Iredell County In the Supe rior(ourt Troy R.Cloaninger and wife, Jettie O. Cloaninger, Plaintiffs vs. Foy P. Brittain and Eugene Baker T/A Brittain Lumber Company, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at a Special Term of the Superior Court for Iredell County, called to be held and held during the week of April 6, 1953, before the undersigned Judge assigned to hold said Court and a jury, and the following issues having been submitted to the Jury and the first issue having been answered as indicated and the second issue having not om answer, to-wit: ated and eged 3. Did the defendants construct or permit to be constructed, loc operated the lumber plant in such a way as to constitute a nuisance, 48 all in the complaint? Answer: No 2. If so, what special damages, if any, are the plaintiffs entitled recover of the defendants? Answer: 4 “4 oes cle se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Friday, April 10th, 1953 It is therefore, consiered, ordered and adjudged that the lumber plant of the defendants mentioned and described in the complaint in this action was and is not sonstructed, located, maintained or operated in such a way as to constitute a uisance, and that the injunctive relief sousht by the plaintiffs against the jefendants be and the same is hereby denied. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs have and recover thing of the defendants or either of them and that the plaintiffs pay the sogts in this action to be taxes by the Vlerk, This the 10th day of April, 1953. George B. Patton Judge Presiding APPEAL ENTRIES Upon the coming in of the verdict, the plaintiffs, in apt time, moved to set aside the verdict of the Jury on Issue No. 1 as being against the greater weight of the evidence and ior a new trial on said issue. Motion denied, Plaintiffs except . Judgment signed, as appears in the record. ‘he plaintiffs except to the fore- roing judgmentfand each and every part thereof. ‘/o the signing and the entry of the judgment plaintiffs except. The plaintiffs give notice of appeal to the ~upreme Court in open court. ‘urther he Court, plaintiffs are notice waived. b+ consent and in the descretion of t allowed sixty days witnin which to mak¢éup and serve case on ap eal and the defendants are allowed thirty days thereafter within which to serve countercase or of ¥3200.U0 adjudged sufficient. file exceptions. Appeal bond in the sum This the 10th day of April, 1953. George B. Patton eee residing wm me eK KO OK ‘No, 5236 Minnie Lee Martin ys Tate Linney ----sssonnsno nnn mmr Continued Me. 5190 John D Beaver vs Clester Roy Beaver ----—-— - Continued ‘No, 5206 James L Miller vs W Ross Vay, Geo H Smith & Fred w Hudson -----= Continued We ne pens vo tee Catt een Continued + 5235 John Clarence Smith vs Ernest ™ Troutman-oo---99 orn win " $4 VW Goodrum ve Vera Loretta Gocdrum enssmeneennn nnn : ate "5322 AG Frazier vs J C Morrow ------" wocceseesooo=" sorocenownoonrnn” 4 5345 R Cashi Co ve Floyd Adams omneweornne"" ---- Continued on T/A Star Milling 4° lice "0. $367 John Rell Wallace vs Mrs Ida h Keller & RL Keller oan Oe al "5972 R Cashion T/A Star Milling Co vs A A sneer rere’: aie 5378 Clarence L Little vs Irene Morrison aR NS RONMK, FIRST WEEK --- APRIL SPECIAL TERM, 1953 493 a = s YNO. 5482 North Varolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell vounty. | N. M. Lewis, T/A Nosco Lewis Machinery and Supply Company, vs ape ee: Ray Rickard, T/A Sanford zace Veneer Company ele Pies lt gs This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell vounty, and it appearing to the Court that this aie action was instituted on February 25, 1953, and that a copy of the summons and verified Complaint were served on the defendant on the 27th day of February, 1953; ’ ; : that the time for answering or otherwise pleading has expired; that the action is for & vn the recovery on notes given by the defendant to the plaintiff, upon which is due $458.30, with interest from Dec. 17, 1951, until paid, and that the plaintiff is entitled to Judgment by Default Final; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $456.30, with interest at 6% per annum from Dec. 17, 1951, until paid. The defendant is taxed with the costs of this action. Fe This April 8th, 1953. C, G. Smith Clerk Superior vLourt we Oe mK OK KM OO +No. 5488 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Cvurt IREDELL COUNTY, Before the Clerk Peerless Mattress Company, t Plaintiff, ! q Vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Lewis Hager, T/A Iredell I Furniture Vompany, | Defendant. i This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court irom the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been ti settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take 4 voluntary nonsts IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIVERLD, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, UPON mot ion of t the plaintiff be Adams, Dearman and winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, tha nonsuit, 4n4 nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary JUDGMENT 7 i Sie of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of vourt the costs This the 8th day of April, 1953. GC. G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, CONSENTED TU: ns, Dearman and Winberry, tere for the plaintiff, BY; Monroe Adams ke OK OK OK OK OK OK OK Noe 5344 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. Anderson-Tully Company, a corporation, Plaintiff, -Vs- North Carolina Furniture Incorporated, a corpora cion, Jefendant. ~_— eeeeeon~S ~~ eernnes err ja ic? Io Im | poe ies I= Je This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, ¥- G. Snith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing that this to recover from the Defendant the sum at’ -One Cents ($2081.31), with interest action was instituted by the Plaintiff two Thousand Eichty-One Dollars and Thirty thereon, on an open account; that the Defendant filed an Answer denying that the Defendant owed the Plaintiff any amount 4s alleged in tue Complaint, and in addition, filed , counterclaim in waich it sought to recover of the Plaintiff the sum of One Thousand One Hundred Nenety=oix Dollars and Fifty Cents ($1196.50), with interest thereon, from December 1, 1951, until paid, and the additional sum of Three Hundred Thirty-Four Dollars and Forty-Four vents ($334.44) for freight ber 29, 1951, until paid, and Three charges, with interest thereon, from Vecer with interest thereon, ‘wmdred Uollars ($300.00) for labor and storage charges, it furtuer appearing to and Defendant that all : the Court from from September 15, 1952, until paid; that the Plaintiff matters the statements at’ the attorneys for s have been settled by ‘n controversy between the parties arising upon the pleading yr Doliars and Fort e accord and satisfaction -Tnree Cents Payment of the aum of Eight Hundred Seventy-Fou ($874,443) by the Defendant to the Plaintiff in complet f Two Thousand Eight y-One Dollars and of : Plaintiff's invoice in the amount 0 es not chose to pursue its riginal cause of ac counterclaim and this Judgment ? Mirty-One Cents (2081.31); that the Plaintiff do ee ’ *ause of action and desires to take a nonsuit as to its 0 t ms likewise, the Defendant does not choose to pursue its e that desires to have the action dismissed; that both parties desir ed shall operate as a complete accord and satisfaction barring each party from maintaining any future action upon the facts alleged in the pleadings herein; that the Plaintiff has agreed to submitto a voluntary nonsuit as to its Cause of action and the Defendant has agreed to submit to a dismissal of its counterclaim, NOW, THEREFOR2, BY CONSENT, 17 IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, aD DECREED: 1. ‘That the Plaintiff's cause of action against the Vefendant be, and it is, hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that the Plaintiff is forever barred from instituting or maintaining a future action, based upon the facts alleged in its Complaint in this cause, 2. That the counterclaim of the Vefendant against the Plaintiff be, and it is, hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that tne Vefendant is lorever barred from instituting or maintaining a future action, based upon the f.cts alleged in its Answer and counterclaim filed in this cause. Signed and entered in the superior Court of Iredell County, in Statesville, North Carolina, on April 15, 1953. UV. G. Sinith veGe OMLTH Clerk of the Superior Court in Iredeil County. JONSENTEU TO: Scott, Collier & Nash Raymer & Raymer “y AB kaymer Attorneys for the Defendant C, H, Dearman Ue He DA AN of tne rirm of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for tne Plaintiff cs OO Ok me kk Om ,No. 5058 NORTH UaROLINA, IN THE SUPEKIOR COURT IRe{DoLL , JUNTY. ~~ Mary Liza Sain, by NF Dewey Sain, Plaintiff, ) -Vs- ) JUDGMENT ) Glyde Wray Randall ) and William E Knicht Defendants, ) This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before his Honor Us Ye Smith, Clerk of the superior Vourt of Iredell Vounty, North Varolina, and it . ; ; . ve appearing to the vourt lrom the statement of counsel that the parties hereto he ' ' sing compromised, adjusted, and settled all matters and things between them and ard on the pleadings filed in this cause, NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, 17 IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, That th® . are, Plaintiff recover nothing by this action, and that the Defendants be, and they geeks he, a te Bree oes “ay Aa ag7 TM wn — ft” — es r discharged of any and all future liability to the Plaintiff by reason foreve of the matters and things alleged in the Compalint; and the Defendants shall pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the VUlerk, Signed and entered in the ~uperior Court of Iredell County, in Statesville, jorth Carolina, on April 1), 1953. C. G, Smith GU. G. SMITH Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County CONSENTED AND AGREED TO: Claude Hicks J, G. Lewis Ittorneys for the Plaintitt ¢. H. Dearman TH. DEARMAN, of the firm of Adams, Dearman & Winberry Attorneys for the Defendant ee KK OK OH fio. 5059 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. Juanita G. Sain, ) Plaintiff, ) -Vs- JUDGHENT Clyde Wray Randall, and 4illiam E. Knight, ) Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, befare his Honor CG, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and i hereto it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel that the parties e compromi se e nd ines hem and hay . ° - thin ‘S between ta 1 oe arising on the pleadings filed in this cause. | ? WOW, THEREFOR, BY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, . | That the Plaintiff recover nothing by this action, and that the Defendants be, 4 , and all future liability to the P tne Defendants shall . laintiff by they are, forever discharged of any = 6 int; and Teason of the matters and things alleged in tie Complaint; Py the costs of this action to be taxed b: the Clerk. 1 County, in Statesville, i A ih Signed and entered in the superior Court of Iredel | ‘rth Carolina, on April 15, 1953. c, G, Smith ; 11 Clerk of the superior vourt of Irede County. VONSENTED AND AGREED TO: “laude Hy ck 1G ‘ie ‘orneys for the neff rye Hl pean Mans po *\, of the Firm of » Dearman & Winbe Kttorneys for the Defendant | r } i} i} 7 A9S (#5293 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK John F. Long, W. E. Webb, Sr., R. H. Kennedy, J. L. McLain and R. C. Millsaps, Individually snd as Commissioners of Iredell County, North Carolina, Plaintiffs, Vs. Statesville Daily Record, Inc., Defendant. oo OC Oo OO OOOO mS os This cause coming on to be heard and veing heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs desire to take a voluntary non suit, and come into this a Court and ask that they be allowed to take a voluntary non suit, and it appearing to the Court that tae plaintiffs nave that right: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby non suited, the plaintiffs being allowed to take a voluntary non suit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs pay the costs of this action This April 23rd, 1953. C. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior court of Iredell County, North Carolina eevee ezeeerrtereevexetke fF #5294 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IKEDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Jorm F. Long, individually, end as Chairman of Democratic Executive Committee of Iredell County, North Carolina, Plaintiff, SJUDGMENRT Vs. Statesville Daily Record, Inc., Defendant. oocolCoco oOo oO oO OOOO This cause coming on to be hard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the pleintiff desires to take a voluntary non suit, and comes into this Court and asks to be allowed to take a voluntary non suit, and it appearing 0 the Court that said plaintiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and n tne same is hereby non suited, the plaintiff being allowed to take @ voluntary no suit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pey - costs of this action. This the 23rd day of April, 1954. C. G. Smith erk Superior Vourt o County, North Carolina rede ekReR ER HRHRHER RHEE JUDGMENT? a ase con Fae eas se ash 499 VAN Rd i 45296 A ya CAROLIN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT st pgDELL COUN 1 Home, Ince, 4 cavite Funere Pla intiff, ; Vs. , JUDGMENT Stevens ¢ yrs, Irene Defe ndent. Tis cause coming on to oe neard before the Honorable ¥. G, Smith, Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County, end it appearing to the Court that the summons snd complaint in said action nas not been served on the Plaintiff and it further appearing that the time has expired for which said summons and complaint can be served; It is, therefore, ordered, judged, and decreed that the action be dismissed and that tne Plaintiff oe taxed with the cost. This 23 day of April, 1953- c. G. Smith Tlerk of Superior Court RRERER TRB ‘#5505 WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Production Credit 0 Association, ) Plaintiff : Vs 0 JUDGME af Q ¥. F, Hinson, Q Defendant ] } Carl G. This cause coming on to be heard, and oeing heard before tne Honorable hat the matters Suith, Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court tha } , hat the plain- ind things in controversy have been settled between tne parties and t tiff has elected to take non-suit in its action; ad that the plaintiff be non-suited It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decree ind be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 2h day of April, 1953. Cc. G. Smith “Clerk of the Superior Court Consented to: W. I, Ward, Jr. Wtorneys for the Plainttit anne e % # enunnnue SR i / #5498 NORTH CAROLINA 150 ROL INA IN THE SUPERIOR couR? OM ort# CARO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY a TREDELL Dont cory Jack Silvers, Tr/As Ee i Estes : ; American orn a 3 Plaintiff, a JUDGMEN®? 2 Vs. SOasurz pavid A. Rish and Ernest t+ Davenport, — Defendants. John H. Tester and Lucy V, Tester, oOo OOO Om Defendants. 3. @ on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor C. G. Smith Tais cause coming on to be heard before the honorable ©. G, Smith, Clerk of This cause coming ’ g . ior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintirr for judgment a- aoe te Super . inst the defendants by default final the parties have agreed and settled the matters and things alleged in the pleadings; gains he defendan ; sires to take a voluntary Nonewuit, with the costs to be taxed And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons that the Plaintiff de , issued in this action on the 2lst day of March, 1954; against the Defendants. i "ORE, ORDEX D, ADJUDGED A! D DECREED that the Plaintiff be, and And it further appearing to the Court that said summons together with a copy IT IS, THEREFORE, Ex D, ad to take a voluntery Nonsuit, and that the Defendants be tax- Of said complaint were served on tne defendants on the 23rd day of March, 1953; he ig, hereby permitte y ° And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or other plead ed with the costs. C. G. Smith « Ge OMITH, Clerk of Superior Cour of Iredell County ing has been filed by the defendants and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; Heeeeteeeeeteeeeee ee & & And it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money he CAROLINA aa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Seven Hundred-Forty-Three and },0/100 IREDELL COUNTY Dollars with interest thereon from the 8th day of February, 1952; lB, Williams, ; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have : Plaintiff, ; and recover of the defendmts the sum of Seven nundred-Forty-Three and 40/100 Vs. , NONSUIT dollars, with interest thereon from tne 8th day of February, 1952, and the costs of ee bens Ernest ; this action. Defendants. Q ; fore his Honor C. G. rd, and being heard, be This 27th day of April, 1954. This cause coming on to be heard, to the Court ‘aith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing lleged in the Clerk of the Superior Court Pree SS GERRED Ne 90 Non-wuit, with the costs Piesdings; that the Plaintiff desires to take a voluntary Non-wuit, TERS ES SHPO % be taxed against the Defendants. r AS tiff be, and he I? IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT THE Plain , axed i Vefendm ts be taxe “s hereby permitted to take a voluntery Nonsuit, and that the "ith the costs, C. G. Smith > clerk O of Iredell County uperior Cour oe Je + ee ee ee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE CIVIL NO. 216 filed Apr 29 1953 Clerk, U.s, Dist. Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. L. P. CAMPBERL DEFAULT JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) Goldsboro Street ) Statesville, North Carolina; ) former address. ) Now resides at: ) 220 Wilmington Avenue ) Statesville, North Carolina. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard upon motion of Thomas A, Uzzell, Jr., United States Attorney, and it appearing to the Court from the record in this cause, and the Court so finds the facts to be ; That complaint was filed and summons issued on November 3, 1952, and personally Served upon the defendant by the United States Marshall for the Districe of Eastern Virginia on March 5, 1953; that no answer or other plea has been filed by the defendant and no appearance entered by him or anyone on his behalf; that this action is brought upon a promissory note and the amount due thereon is definite and certain; that the time for filing answer has expired and the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for; The Court so finds the facts to be. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED & DECREED that the plaintiff, the United States of America, have and recover of the defendant, L. P. Campbell, the sum of $1,063.03, plus interest at four (4%) per annum on $930.13 from July 1, 1951 until paid and for the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. The Clerk of this Court will certify a transcript of this judgment for docketing in the Office of the Clerk of Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina. This 28thday of April, 1953. s/ Wilson Warlick UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ; ina Filed in the office of the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, North Caroliné, on the lst day of May, 1953, at 8:30 o'clock A. M. C. G. Smith Clerk SOIR de tate teak se ate ae ae ae ake ae a ak a ak eect seetemneeeemenen Lt eee ——accsinaiaisnsinnannasaesiasssiioss cL ete eneeeen No, 5h22—A JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA thristine McCrary Bowles Spring Term, 1953 vs louis Grant Bowles No. 379 Iredell County, This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of Opinion that there is --. error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court, It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable R. Hunt Parker Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS REVERSED ind it is considered and adjudged further, that the defendant do pay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, to wit, the sum of Fortythree and 75/100 dollars ($43.75), and execution issue therefor. A TRUE COPY Adrian J. Newton Clerk of the Supreme Court. Filed in office of the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, N.C. on the 5th day of May, 1953. C. G. Smith, CSC (SBAL ) x * * &* € K* & K No. 5201 JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Parks Andrew McLean, et als Spring Term, 1953 vs Iredell County. Town of Mooresville, N.C. No. 385 This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion that there is no error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. opinion It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the op ‘ be f the Court, as delivered by the Honorable J. Wallace Winborne Justice, be had “tified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the proceedings rein said cause according to law as declared in said opinion to the ties ind it is considered and adjudged further, that the plaintiffs and sure this ‘ppeal bond E. L. Carson and J. C. Rumple do pay the costs of the appeal in and ‘urt incurred, to wit, the sum of Sixteen and 70/100 Dollars ($16.70), J. Newton srert te tne Supreme Court. N.C. on the 5th tx, *Cution issue therefor. (SB ” A TRUE COPY P ‘led in the office of Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, a of May, 1953, C, G, Smith , * * ¢ # * Y 0A Hi / i s : J No. 5191 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Spring Term, 1953 SUPREME COURT Shaver Motor Co., Inc., Thomas & Howard No. 382 Co., Inc., Quality Southern Oil Co., Inc., Holland Transfer Co., W. R. Holland, Statesville Fabricating & Welding Co., Frank L. Walker, D. W. Moose, Rev. Paul Reese, Mrs. Earl Kuy- kendall, David Moss, Mrs. David Moss, Louisa C. Littleton, L. P. Johnson, Dora Johnson, R. R. Fox, W. Carl Moore, J. B. Renegar, Hoyle Eller, C. F. Crooks, Jr., C. E.Tate, Virginia F. Tate, Melvin Troutman, R. R. Brawley, A. N. Rutledge, Mrs. A. N. Rutledge, A.G. Guthrie, Mrs. Anne W.Guthrie, Edward B. Hadges, Mimiam P. Hodges, Robert J. Smith, Evelyn G. Smith, Billye R. Brown, R. P.Wilhelm, 11] Eva M. Wilhelm, Mrs. Lizzie Brown, J. M. Harmon, Hazel S. Harmon, L. M. Lackey, Mrs. Lillian Fox, C. T. Allison, Mrs. C. T. Allison, Smith-Douglas, Co., Inc., Henry H. Poston, G. H. Mitchell, Mrs. D. O. Cowan, Mrs. C. H. Gant, Robert Y. Gill, Do. 0. Cowan, Jr., Joe Summers, Sam C.Gaither, M. J. Angell, Jr., Karl 4 Bargey Statesville Country Club, Gordon | Poston, Mrs. John Carson, dr., H. V. Lutz, Carl M. Pope Iredell County 2 Ve THE CITY OF STATESVILLE This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court, Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of ; opinion that there is no error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. : It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable Emery B. Denny, Justice, be certified | to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED. And it is ; considered and adjudged further, that the defendant and surety to the appeal bond wit, the sum of Thirty-Four and 20/100 Dollars ($34.20), and execution issue therefor: ; (SEAL) | | Travelers Indemnity Co. do pay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, to | A TRUE COPY drian J. Newton Sree of the Supreme court Filed in the office of the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, N. ©. on the Sth day of May, 1953. C. Ge. Smith — . ££ 2 ¢.2 8. 2.28 ks ee esis oes Noe 5483 watt CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT iREDELL COUNTY. yterial Handlers, Ince, Plaintiff VSe JUDGMENT NONSUIT janes BE. Meacham, T/A yeacham & Watts Concrete Company, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned ‘lerk of the Sjperior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Scott and Collier, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit: IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED upon motion of Scott & Collier, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, j costs of and this action dismissed and terminated as of viuntary nonsuilt, and the this action be taxed against the Plaintiff by the Clerk of Court. This the 24th day of April, 1953. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Consented to: Scott & Collier Attorneys for the Plaintiff By Sew Aw Collier v er No. 5191 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Spring Term, 1953 SUPREME COURT Shaver Motor Co., Inc., Thomas & Howard Co., Inc., Quality Southern Oil Co., Inc., Holland Transfer Co., W. R. Holland, Statesville Fabricating & Welding Co., Frank L. Walker, D. W. Moose, Rev. Paul Reese, Mrs. Earl Kuy- kendall, David Moss, Mrs. David Moss, Louisa C. Littleton, L. P. Johnson, Dora Johnson, R. R. Fox, W. Carl Moore, Jd. B. Renegar, Hoyle Eller, C. F. Crooks, Jr., C. E.Tate, Virginia F. Tate, Melvin Troutman, R. R. Brawley, A. N. Rutledge, Mrs. A. N. Rutledge, A.G. Guthrie, Mrs. Anne W.Guthrie, Edward B. Hadges, Mimiam P, Hodges, Robert J. Smith, Evelyn G. Smith, Billye R. Brown, R. P.Wilhelm, Eva M. Wilhelm, Mrs. Lizzie Brown, J. M. Harmon, Hazel S. Harmon, L. M. Lackey, Mrs. Lillian Fox, C. T. Allison, Mrs. C. T. Allison, Smith-Douglas, Co., Inc., Henry H. Poston, G. H. Mitchell, Mrs. D. O. Cowan, Mrs. C. H. Gant, Robert Y. Gill, Do. 0. Cowan, Jr., Joe Summers, Sam C.Gaither, M. J. Angell, Jr., Karl Bargeg Statesville Country Club, Gordon Poston, Mrs. John Carson, Jr., H. V. Lutz, Carl M. Pope No. 382 Iredell County Ve THE CITY OF STATESVILLE This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court, Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion that there is no error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable Emery B. Denny, dustice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED. And it is considered and adjudged further, that the defendant and surety to the appeal bond Travelers Indemnity Co. do pay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, to + FSD geo + LER Re porn sc PS LL EE OIE OR NN, : wit, the sum of Thirty-Four and 20/100 Dollars ($34.20), and execution issue therefor. ’ (SAL) A TRUE COPY Adrian J. Newton ——— erk of the Supreme ou Filed in the office of the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, N. ©. 0 the 5th day of May, 1953. C. G. Smith eT Noe 5483 rtd CAROLINA, rREDELL COUNTY. yterial Handlers, Ince, Plaintiff VSe E. Meacham, T/A aches & Watts Concrete Company, ee ee ef 08 68 88 £8 8 £8 6F OF Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned ‘lerk of the Sjperior Court of Iredell County, the Court from th that all matters and things arising in this acti and the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit: IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDE of Scott & Collier, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the pl and this action dismissed and term this action be taxed against the Plaintiff by the This the 24th day of April, 1953. C. Ge Smith “Clerk Superior Court Consented to: Scott & Collier Attorneys for the Plaintiff By Sew Aw Collier IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT NONSUIT North Carolina, and it appearing to e statement of Scott and Collier, Attorneys for the plaintiff, on have been settled and compromised, RED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED upon motion aintiff be nonsuited, inated as of wiuntary nonsuit, and the cost Clerk of Court. No. 5503 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Mrs. Pauline B. Sloan, Administratrix of the Estate of Lawrence Sloan, Vs. Quality Oil Transport Company, a Corporation, This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff, NONSUIT Defendant. the Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing that Summons was issued on March 24, 1953; that from the return made by the Deputy Sheriff of Forsyth County, it is indicated that the Summons and an Order Extending the Time to File a Complaint were served on J. H. Glenn, Jr., partner of the Quality Oil Transport Company; that since the Action was instituted against the Corporation, the Plaintiff now desires to take a voluntary Nonsuit. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the Plaintiff be, and she is, permitted to take a voluntary Nonsuit, with the Court costs assessed against her. Entered and signed in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on May ll, 1953. C. G. Smith cial C. Ge omith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. kek KK KK KR KR KK OK KK KK KH tS pes ‘4 “ xe \ Eg os q ag cog att ates ays a aa oti as as paren a sedan 9 2) Ting scenes ci RTS r RE. ot 5 3 oleae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 18th, 1953 We ort CAROLINA, sggDELL COUNTY» Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 18th day of Yay, 1953, at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. when and where His Honor Zeb V. Nettles, Judge ’ presiding and ho 1953, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor and ’ lding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is prosecuting in the name of the State. J.C. Rumple, High Sheriff of present and Iredell County, is present and opened .. by order of the Court. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for the May Term, 1953, First Week, to-wit: Willie Padgett J. T. Gilleland Mrs. H. H. Yount L. S. Williams ¥. H. Padgett John M. McConnell J. C. Elliott Rk. G. West Robert V. Bfantley J. C. Miller Elizabeth Connolly James L. Miller William L. Howard Harold A. Drum V. E. Holland Prank H. Sherrill Vv. T. Moran Mrs. J. H. Troutman E, F, Belk Mrs. Floyd Warren Clarence E. Faircloth Luther A. Lippard Ila Wilson Kyles John T. Hendren C, F. Linker Forest Thompson T. C. Ostwalt Marvin W Byrd M. T. Overcash C. Harold Brown 1M Cook Mrs. Jessie Plyler A. M. Guy, dF- C. C. McHargue Samuel 0, Thomas Ray Russell Willie Padgett was excuses by the Court. . H. Troutman were W. H. Padgett, Mrs. Jessie Plyler, Mrs. H. H. Yount and Mrs. Jd H *xcused by doctor's certificates. RG. West was deceased. Robert V. Brantley was in service. \. S. Williamd was not returned. ‘larence E, Faircloth was not returned. urys '.B. Goforth Was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury iNo, 1205 State BASTARDY ! ! hn Alias Capias. Nathan Patterson IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 18th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 18th, 1953 Clifford Charles Hall 3 vs 4 Parks Shumaker ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT not less than two (2) nor more than three (3) YEARS, to be assigned to work on the roads under ot’ No. 1345 } POSSESS LIQUOR Wo. 1724 : o Alias Capias. state ! Alias Capias. q Mary Saunders { a Wall { | {No.1403 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON B® 40, 1734 } DRUNK & DISORDERLY | wes Alias Capias. “Bstate Alias Capias | Clement P Gaither, Jr { | wilerd L Dison { | Me, 12 54, ) ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON : fo, 1816 ABANDON . ! Continued under former order. Bi state r oe called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci | Benjamin J. Threatte, Jr. { ous Monroe Southers Se | Mo. 1uL5 FORGERY 5 ip, 1821 MANSLAUGHTER Vs Alias Capias. 4 State Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be = confined in the common jail of Iredell County for Troy Fesperman <_< a SC | JNo. 1509 4 W-34 | : LARCENY a the supervision of the State High aT! — Alias Capias. a Works Commission. ee ' { ey. 1! Toby Hyde “ No. 1828 MALICIOUS INJURY TO PERSONAL PROPERTY IH re State Continued under former order. 1h th — _— } ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON “4 vs a | - e : Nol Pros With Leave. 4 Insel Jones ti William Leroy Smith i 8 fo. 1760 | SPEEDING i No. 1 : Stat . 1572 a ate { Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. ) ) State see Pee eae 4 vs }| Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be i} vs | pias. “@ Claude Eugene Pitts } confined in the common jail of iredell County for a Bud Little alias i 2 = 7. 26 } a term of thirty (30) Days, to be assigned to Marshall Little { ys } work on the roads under the supervision of the oat , | State Highway and Public Works Commission. ih ‘No. 1599 i } This prison sentence is suspended for a term of Hi State os HOW-SUPPORT i } Five (5) Years on the following expressed conditions: | pe { ee NEREY SEeNEe Aen. 4 { l. That he be and remain of good behavior and George E. Creson j i ont heen of tae, State My ° « Ce wi rega ° | (Wo. 1604 | DRIVING DRUNK : vehicles ) t ; . — gs Ta pay the cts of Ray aabgequet 4 Permission is given the vou | eee eee Saw "4 | term during said Five (5) Years to place this | INo. 1605 q { prison sentence into effect if it shall appear that State | ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT 3 the defendant has violated any of the terms and | vs Continued under former order. ; conditions hereof. a | a BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY | | e Defendant enters a plea 0 . | an { DRIVING DRUNK I I Judgment of the Court is that the defendant am ) ea } Alias Capias. rf luther Newton Shelton confined in the State Prison at Raleigh for a (s). ' W-36 of not less than Three (3) nor more than Five \- ee Pane Salen ! Years. Both counts in the Bill of Indictment are \ consolidated for judgment. y Sg ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON bis sees ias Capias. : RUNK ; vs j pias State eal an through his attorney, W. R. Battley, - D. Gray ' VS enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. fendant be ‘Me. 1633 Milliam J, Kiker Sudgment of the court is that the defendants 2. State | ASSAULT ON FEMALE O.mne imprisoned in the common a sosigned to work eo : Continued under former order. a term of Six (6) Menthe: pervision of the State Homer A Nantz j oo = reat ebiie Works Commission. This prison Highway “ suspended for a term of Five (5) Years sentence ** : ditions: con on the following payer of good pehavior. state of N. C- of $200.00 and the cost JNo. 16 oo } ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT ela vs : Continued under former order. b. That he not violate “3. cf Amer re. 2. That he nov v'the U. S. of America. of this action. in the motor yehicle 2>No. 1660 { ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT State ; . os Continued under former order. be s. .. fer oe, of two (2) Years from P. W. 000) a er ; a | the riguns ; goes his driver's license to 5, That he Public Safety d to the Director of f this judge be transmitte with a copy ° Raleigh, N. Cos ment. “510 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 18th, 1953 Nos. 1839 & 1840 i State vs Eugene Clifford Emerson James Gray Hemmings ~ ‘Nos. 1867 & 1869 mit State VS f Billy Eugene Huntsinger Mary G. Huntsinger Wi} = No. 1844 Tah State vs Flora Bailey No. 1838 State vs Eugene Clifford Emerson “Nos. 1842 & 1843 State vs Robert Lee Strange Bill Jones “No. 1339 State vs David H. Harkey ) No. 1807 State vs William Glenn Burgess a“/- 7- 4S \No. 1868 State vs Mary G. Huntsinger \No. 1867 State vs oor Eugene Huntsinger sNo. 1848 i State } vs { Stanford Lowell Lambert, Jr | Wo. 1834 i State | vs | ‘ Nelson Curlee Land BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill. oss 1849 & 1850 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 18th, 1953 DRIVING : a AFTER LICENSE REVOKED: 4TH OFFENSE DRIVING | state \ Defendan t enters a plea of i onli Earl Sharpe i Consolidated for suki « — se W-3h | Judgment of the Court is that the defendant LARCENY } be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County | for a term of Eight (8) Months, to b A true Bill ‘ , to be assigned to | } work in and around the County Jail or other ‘ } County Institution. ; ) It is ordered that a certified copy of this | judgment be sent to the Director of Public Safety, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ; } Raleigh, N. C., for the purpese of having his A True Bill. | license for driving an automobile barred for life. B® v, 1103 { FALSE PRETENSE : state . ae through his counsel enters a plea of fi olo Contendere. ee ye WEAPON - INTENT TO KILL : sy Ramsey t Judgment of the Court is that the defendant * } be imprisoned in the State's Prison at Raleigh, N.C. : | For a term of not less than two (2) nor more than 2 } Three (3) Years. This prison sentence is suspended ; : ; ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ‘ Rear ghn 1 Rh eo oe eee —— 4 ' “1, That he pay to the prosecuting witness, in { Cc. A. Kyles, of Statesville,, N.C. the sum of } $800.00 in full and complete restitution for all } Claims and demands arising by reason of the indict- DRIVING DRUNK } ment herein, which said sum shall be a" as oe i The sum of $250.00 in cash now, an the cost 0 osaee antics ak a that the defendant this action, and the balance of 3550.00 at the rate Zourt f i i ugust Term, 1950, of this § of $50.00 per month, the first payment to be made Cision a SS ce ae a vehicle upon the public } on or before the 20th day of June, 1953, and each Sus canes sent a >} o> ee { month thereafter for eleven consecutive months Judge presiding. This aoe taki a0 one } until the total sum of $550.00 shall have a —. . as a fac a i i the ; nts shall be made intothe office 0 cree the pert of the Judgnent with reference to t 1 neck puperior Court of this Court for the use and ence to the . inabove named. bond is hereby stricken out and the Clerk of this | Benefit of the ge wT aneee a andes wenavier Court is ordered to refund the bond to the defendant. es oe ae taaah laws of the State of and not Vv DRIVING DRUNK | n+ ch it shall appear at any time that the — ~ i an annanaae: Yeava, bie etecrecy, 8. Site | of this suspended seoverorore set forth, shall have plea of Guilty. 1 immediately issue Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay { been violated, — capias ore ine apprehension of a fine of $100.00 and pay the cost of this action, j either in or ov a“ oe at a subsequent term and that he surrender his driver's license to be { the defendant, a f th rison sentence ewe 7 to the Director of Public Safety, Raleigh, } may order the ie" of the p . . C., for the purpose of having it revoked as hereinabove imposed. provided by tame The defendant is to remain on his present es at the August, 1953, 2erm, } and make his appearance 1954, and LARCENY j} the January Term, 1954, and the May Term, nd , Defendant tenders a plea of aiding and abetting |} show that he has complied with the terms 4 in the charge of larceny. } stipulations of this judgment. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be ete in the State's Prison, Women's Division, at Raleigh, N. C. for a term of not less than one dio, 184.8 KLESS DRIVING l (1) nor more than three (3) Years. State a aeniat through his attorney, W. R. Battiey, vs enters a plea ° Not Guilty. LARCENY Hugh Mitchell is private prosecuting attorney for the State. Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the State's Prison at Raleigh, ™. ¥- for a term of not less than Four (4) nor mere than Seven (7) Years. RECKLESS DRIVING A TrueBill. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill. a Lowell Lambert, Jr d. Jury sworn and CPO endant tenders a plea of During the trial the ng ROMY °. ilty of violation of Sec , gu Judgnent of the Court is una Ene, Ae opentte y ey® imprisoned in the ne at? ae A super to wor ae be eoignie State Highway and Public Works z This sentence pay the cost © os of this judg eas corti fiscter ef Public Safety, Raleigh, Ae , oe — <> A A A A TS — eo IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 18th, 1953 JNos. 1842 and 1843 State vs Robert Lee Strange, C- Bill Jones, C- | 7 | | No. 1866 State vs Walter D. Peacock, dr. ‘No. 1844 State vs Flora Bailey C-37 \No. 1836 State vs James M Lamson W-26 \No. 1847 State vs Emanuel Tucker C-23 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendants through their attorne Simons, enter a plea of Not Guilty, a rgb and empanelled, uring the trial the defendan : plea of not guilty and tender a Poe wee Mage assault with deadly weapon, which plea gee Bal by the .State. S accepted Judgment of the Court is t each of them be imprisoned sn the Come nite a Iredell County for a term of Twelve (12) _ to be assigned to work on the public ‘eae’ under the supervision ef the State Highwa Public Works Commission. This prison seakenes suspended for a term of three (3) Years on —" eet conditions; . s to Robert Strange, the prison j suspended on condition that ns be ont San goed behavior and not violate any criminal lew f of the State of N. C. or the U. S. of America a pay the cost of this action by the August Tern of this Court, The defendant to give bond in the sum of $200.00 to make his appearance at the August Term to show that he has complied with the terms a of this judgment. s to Bill Jones, the prison sentence is sus for three (3) Years on condition the defendant - and remain of good behavior and not violate any of the criminal laws of the State of N. C. or the U. S. of America, and pay into the office of the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County the sum of $300.00 for the use and benefit of Johm Waddell; the said sum to be paid, $100.00 by the August Tern, 1953, $100.00 by the November Term, 1953, and $100.06 by the January Term 1954. The defendant to give bond in the sum of $500.00 to make his appearance at each term of said court to show that he has complied with the terms and conditions of this judgment. The defendant to pay the cost of this action now. ys, Lewis and LARCENY OF AUTO A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Elizabeth Connolly, Harold A. Drum, Frank H .Sherrill, &. F. Belk, Luther A. Lippard, C. F. Linker, Marvin W. Byrd, J. M. Cook, Samuel 0. Thomas, J. T- Gilleland, John M. McConnell and James L. Miller. Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in the Bill of Indictment. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Eight (8) Months, to be assigned to work in or around the County Jail or other County Institution. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant through his attorney, W R Battley», bh enters a plea of .Guilty to Forcible Trespass whic “ the State accepts. e core of rayer for judgment continued for a te Three (3) Years ea the condition that the defendant pay the cost of this action. SPEEDING bing Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to viola nicle the speeding laws,to-wit, operating 4 motor ve at 75 miles per hour on the public Judgment of the Court is that t imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell we & a term of Six Months, to be assigned to wor the State Highways under the supervision © State Highway and Public Works Commission. (Cont'd on page 513) a lea ees Ho. 1847 State vs Bnanuel Tucker (+23 Ko, 1836 State vs James M. Lamson fo, 1845 State vs Haskell Mayfield C- dios, 1774 & 1775 State vs Le L. (Bill) Lackey “~ Cameron Harrison (Cam) Hayes W- >. 3/ Ho. 1853 State Carl Bynum, Jr, YN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 18th, 1953 (Cont'd from page 512) The prison sentence is suspended for three (3) Years a term of tions: on the following expressed condi- l. That the defend : the cost of this srry ul pay a fine of $100.00 and 2. That he not operate am i ‘ otor veh = highways of the State of N. C. aa pnts period, and that he surrender his driver's ee gree Rag = to the Director of ety, Raleigh, N.C., to i a — of this judgment. ee ermission is given to the Gourt at an y subsequent term to place this sentence into effect if it should appear that the defendant has violated any of the conditions of this judgment. (upg. %37) BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Guilty to Assault with deadly weapon, which plea the State will accept. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Twelve (12) Months, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. PERMITTING MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR ON HIS PROPERTY: MANUFACTURING LIQUOR Defendants through their attorney, J. G. Lewis, enter a plea of Nolo Contendere. These two cases consolidated for judgment. Judgment of the court is that the defendants and each of them be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Eighteen (18) Months, to be assigned to work on the public highways under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of .Five (5) Years on the following expressed conditions: 1. That the defendants shall pay a fine of $1,000.00. 2, That the defendant, L. Le Lackey, shall not violate any of the criminal laws of the State of N. C. or the U. S. of America, and shall be and remain of good behavior during said five-year period, and that the defendant Cameron Hayes shall be and remain of good behavior and not violate any criminal laws of the State of N. C. or the U. S. of America for said five year period. That the defendants shall make their appearance at the January and August Terms of this Court for the eo rr ia i ny 0 show that they have not nee * ia eee ie this judgment. conditions of ded a cenditien that the defendants pay or cause to be paid the said fine toe sion is y asen aaa said Five-year retry to a. into effect if it shall appe oteniante or either of them have violated any of the terms and conditions hereof. The defendants to pay the cost ef this action. RECKLESS DRIVING A true bill. 513 ey FIRST WEEK Monday, May 18th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT . ben---- MAY TERM, 1953 No. 1834 State vs Nelson Curlee Land W-19 \nos. 1888 & 1889 State vs William Taylor wm 92 4 No. 1812 State vs Troy Church *No. 1757 State vs Arthur Gilbert Jones “No. 1763 State vs Guy Richard Elmore *No. 1764 State vs Richard Glenn Bowers \ BREAKING, ere & LARCENY Defendant through his attorne enters a plea of Not Guilty. ideal warts, Jury sworn and empanelled,. Defendant through his attorney wit ‘ plea of Not Guilty and enters a aes oF aati to Forcible Trespass which plea the State will reek at a bet udgment o e Court is that the d be imprisoned in the Common Jail of 1900der heat for a term of Twelve Months, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State : Highway and Public Works Commission. This prison sentence is suspended for a term of Three (3) years and the defendant is placed on probation, subject to all the terms and conditions of the probation judgment signed simultaneously herewith. Further condition that the defendant be and remain of good behavior and not violate any criminal laws of the State of N. C. or U. S. of America and that he not loaf or loiter around any place of public entertainment. Defendant to pay 4 the cost by the August Term of this Court and 4 by the November Term, 1953. FORGERY Defendant enters a plea ofGuilty in both cases, Consolidated for judgment. It appearing to the Court that the defendant has heretofore served time on the State Highway ina series of checks in which the two cases here are part of, these cases are consolidated for judgment, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the State's Prison at Raleigh for not less than three (3) nor more than Five (5) Years. This prison sentence is suspended for five years on the following expressed conditions: 1. That the defendant pay the cost of this action. 2. That he 36 That he 4. That he State of N.C. period. Permission is given the Court at any subsequent term during said five-year period to place the prison sentence into effect if it shall appear that the defendant has violated any of the terms and conditions hereof. make full restitution. be and remain of good behavior. not vielate any criminal law of the or the U. S. A. for said five-year ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Nol Pros With Leave. MURDER Continued. DRIVING DRUNK Continued, DRIVING DRUNK Continued. Ses eae tes HS OSES eras sree rene 2 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 18th, 1953 —t | ncn AMATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT sotY OF IREDELL Docket No. 1368 gtATE OF NORTH CAROLINA VS. ORDER FOR CAPIAS }, Je CAMPBELL WHEREAS at the May 22nd, 1950 Term of Superior Court in the County of Iredell, jorth Carolina, before the Honorable W. H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding, the above- naged defendant, J. Je Campbell, entered a plea of Guilty to the crime of Forgery, and WHEREAS it was the judgment of the Court that the defendant be sentenced to One Year in State's Prison, which prison sentence was suspended and the defendant placed on probation for a period of Three Years under the supervision of the jorth Carolina Probation Commission and its officers with such conditions of probation being imposed as are set forth by Statute, and WHEREAS it is now brought to the attention of the Court yy a duly authorized Probation Officer who is a sworn Officer of the Court that the said defendant, J. J. Campbell, has wilfully violated the terms and conditions of the Probation Judgment as follows: l. Failed to report to the Probation Officer as ordered. e without written permission of the 2. f residenc Changed his place o considered an absconder. Probation Officer and is now i k of i IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that a Capias be issued by the Clerk of this e may be taken and returned to the Court fer the above-named defendant, that h s of the Court for a hearing as to his guilt or innocence of violating the order Court, iff or other IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that when the defendant be found, the Sheriff o ; the defendant duly authorized Law Enforcement Officer of this County shall return in Court for the hearing above mentioned. ‘0 Iredell County and shall produce him This the 18th day of May, 1953. b V. Nettles _ & Judge Presiding a a ” gme Fa and Instanter Capias- vs Soldie Mae Setzer ning, May 19, a 9: This Honorable Court takes a recess until T $30 o'clock Ae M. —— FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, May 19th, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morni ng, May 19th, 1953, at 9:30 otclock A. M. |No. 1800 State vs Ralph Wesley Carter W- 27 ‘No. 1861 State vs James Owens Johnson w-m-tt No. 1876 State vs Emma Johnson INo. 1872 State vs Holt Monroe Lothery We \No. 1885 State vs Glenn P. Benge No. 1884 State vs Glenn P. Benge SPEEDING Defendant through his attorney, M enters a plea of Guilty. Yo MPo Sowers, Judgment of the Court is that the def a0 Be fine of $25.00 and pay the cost a action. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant through his attorney, Mr. ; enters a plea of Guilty. es MoLaughlia, Prayer for judgment continued for a term of Three (3) Years on the condition that the defendant pay the cost of this action. POSSESS FOR PURPOSE OF SALE NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant through her attorney, John R. McLaughlir © enters a plea of .Guilty. Br Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Six (6) Months, to be assigned to work in and around the County Jail or other County Institution. ee ee DRIVING DRUNK Not F Defendant enters a plea of/Guilty through his : attorney, Grant Bolmer. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: V. E. Holland, V. T. Moran, Ila Wilson Kyles, Forest Thompson, M. T. Overcash, Ray Russell, J. C. Elliott, J. C. Miller, William L. Howard, John T. Hendren, T. C. Ostwalt and C Harold Brown. Jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. t Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Six (6) Months, to be assigned to work on the public highways under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This prison sentence is suspended for a termof ; Three (3) Years on the following expressed conditions: | 1. That the defendant be and remain of good ‘ behavior. 4 2, .That he pay a fine of $250.00 and pay the cost of this action. 3. That he not operate a motor vehicle within the State of N. C. for said three-year period, it appearing to the Court that this is the second conviction for violating the drunken driving statute. The defendant to surrender his driver's license to be transmitted to the Director of Public Safety, Raleigh, N.C., for the purpose O) having his license revoked, and it is ordered tha a certified copy of this judgment accompany said driver's license. nt Permission is given the Court at any subseque term during said three-year period to place the prison sentence into effect if it shall appear that the defendant has violated any of the te and conditions hereof. Se eee ales Fe @ Eo al agg ete a tee i Forgery A True Bill. FORGERY A True Bill. FIRST WEEK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ------ MAY TERM, 1 Tuesday, May 19th, 1933 a fo, 1860 State vs Herman Harris Pierce fo, 1880 State \ vs george M. Smith ho, 1859 State vs Joe Walker Brown W- 3/ ho, 1963 State Vs Stamey Head “lo. 188) State vs uC, Kennerly ‘No, 1882 State Vs ‘onnie Shuford ——— ee DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorne i ac e wae a plea of Not Guilty. r lbs, t the close of the State's eviden : ce the C directs a verdict of not guilty of driving = intoxicated. It is ordered that he give a $100.00 bond for his appearance before the Recorder's Court to answer to a charge of being drunk in a public place. ; False Pretense The defendant through his counsel waives bill of indictment and enters a plea of guilty of operating a car without the consent of the owner. ; Prayer for judgment continued and the defendant is placed on probation for a term of Three (3) Years under the supervision of the N. C. Probation Lommis- sion, subject to the provisions of the laws of this State and the rules and orders of said Commission; That as special conditions of probation ordered by the Court, the defendant shall: 1. Pay half the cost by the August, 1953 Term of Superior Court. Pay half the cost by the November, 1953, Term of Superior Court. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney, J. G. Lewis, enters 2 plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Elizabeth Connelly, Harold A. Drum, Frank H. Sherrill, E. F. Belk, C. F. Linker, J. M. Cook, Samuel 0. Thomas, J. T. Gilleland, John M. McConnell, James L. Miller, A. M. Guy, Jr. and C. C. McHargue. Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in the warrant. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of Six (6) Months, to be assigned to work on the public highways under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This prison sentence is suspended for a period of Five Years on the following expressed conditions: 1. That the defendant be and remain of good behavior and not violate any criminal laws of the f N. C. or the U. Se Ae 7. That he pay a4 fine of $250.00 and the cost of this action. 3. That he not operat State of N. C. for a peri rising of this courte — enThat ne surrender his driver's license ’ be transmitted to the Director of Public Safety, a Raleigh, togethe Permission is give term within said Five-year period to place this the defendant has e into effect if it appears tne © ae any of the conditions of this judgment. e a motor vehicle in the od of three (3) Years FAIL TO KEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL A True Bill. FALSE PRETENSE A True Bill. BREAKING & ENTERING A True Bill. { | 18 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, May 19th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, May 19th, 1953 4No. 1881 } FALSE PRETENSE State : Defendant through his attorn e : “ : , enters a plea of Not Guilty. Y» Grant Beleer, fos. 1874 & 1875 DRIVING DRUNK: POSSESSION . Ce. Kennerly Jury sworn and empanelled a ; tate Defendant through W-37 | ¥, G» Bbtland, Ys fs Miron, Tie Writes hii 7. | sentenced. | Thompson, M. T. Overcash, Ray Russell rd re Forest gingham Neil Freeze ! Defendant through his attorney withdraws hi | J. C. Miller, William L. How ra ve Elliott, | plea of Not Guilty and en awe his ard, John T. Hend y ters a plea of Guilty t | T. C. Ostwalt and C. Harold Brom. |” | both cases, Sion { Jury returned a verdict of guilty as char eeeeeceneee for judgment. | _ Judgment of the Court is that the deteumn “ udgment of the Court is that the defendant be | imprisoned in the State's Prison at Raleigh a 1 f preewerr te ire Vevae ett Ot sretel, Comey } for a term of not less than one (1) nor = » N.C. i ae term of Six (6) Months, to be assigned to | Two (2) Years. This prison sentence i ae wee Oe See ee eo ae } a term of Five (5) Years on the foll ao oe ne "ionas oe are a tae Bityeagrspcicgged in 1. That he pay into the office of tan —. { Fare on Uhr folie -onagare: A bs diinalallaa Ma Superior Court of Iredell C iy ollowing conditions: | fae ths wis ae See ak oe tare - ¢ $290.00 : nis That the defendant be and remain of good | Implement Company, of Charlotte, N C. — ' of the state rte the o. ee _ Ze «That he pay the cost of ‘iia. ‘ e Ve @ Ue De Ae 36 — he be and remain of good ouaeaie and | of oe ea a not violate any criminal laws of the S$ : {| or the U. S. of America. The cabapeas Gs a | public ee a ie tacks en. et { in the sum of $200.00 to make hi oo gf ties cea + i ee } August and Ja T © BLS Appearance &s the : } Years from the rising of this court, the defendant oF maa ae olay of this Court for a period : } to surrender his driver's license to be transmitted ot phi ioaa uieh by satisfactory testimony that 7 } to the Director of Public Safety, Raleigh, N. C., 1 eeanens p ' the terms, stipulations and & } for the purpose of having his license revoked as onditions of this judgment. c | provided by law, and a certified copy of this No. 18 3 judgment shall accompany said license. so * } SPEEDING * | Permission is given to the Court at any subsequent a ' Nol ProsWith Leave. } term to place this sentence into effect if it should | appear that the defendant has violated any of the 1 Bert W. Sweet No. 1826 RECKLESS DRIVING Wos. 1851, 1852, ar) ae a : ! — { Defendant through his attorney, Hugh Mitchell, , { Bert W. Sweet ; aaa a plea of Guilty to Reckless Driving. 6 1854 RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVING DRUNK ° udgment of the Court is that the defendant ta - Continued. } a fine of $50.00 and pay the cost of this aeatiee e ~ ! ! It is ordered by the Court that a nokéteon of Boil Bynum, Jr. ! | of this conviction be made on the defendant's driver's © W-26 : } license and a report of same be sent to the Director i } of Public Safety, Raleigh, N. C. am No. 1879 } POSSESS NON-TAXPAID LIQUOR \N Fi State i Defendant through his attorneys, McLaughlin & No. 1870 | RECKLESS DRIVING ii vs } Battley, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. — ! Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to Driving through 4 iy Tucker { detgnent OF ae “ Se eT eee j a . the Common va | Joseph I. Mills. J | a stop light through his attorney, Grant Bolmer. ; { imprisoned in 2) Months, to be assigned to ! P » UDe ‘ Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay : ) for a term of Six ( , | } a fine of $25.00 and pa a. a. of this actions {| work on the roads under the supervision of the | . ~— } State Highway and Public Works Commission. This | s } prison sentence is suspended for a period of three mee 1884, | FORGERY t } years on the following expressed conditions: ‘ State { Nol Pros With Leave | | 1. That the defendant be and remain of goo = ! . a } behavior and not violate any of the criminal laws mam %. Senge | of the State of N.C. or the U. S. A. wN } 2, That he pay the cost of this ye 0. 1885 | FORGE j h ke his appearance a RY 7 ! 3, wat @ = d show the — J a enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. : and January Terme ory evidence that he has not u Glenn P. Benge } getgeess oF tee oe ean ot “he Ce } violated any of the terms and conditions of this i for a term of not less than One (1) nor nore than } judgment. : rt at an subsequent ¢ Gwe (2) Tears. thie rie “6 suspendet page ree given to the ite effect if it should | for a term of Five (5) Years on condition the defen- } term to place pap at has violated any of the dant be and remain of good behavior and not yielite ; ee or Sudgnent. pny criminal laws of the State of N. ©. or the Vs ¥° conditions © : = ert} and support cal maintain his wife and + amily and pay the cost of this action. 0. 187) i Permission is given to the Court at any subsequent” State ) aacciee® veggie Leave on recommendation of the {| term to place this sentence into effect if it shou Vs i Nol Pros | appear that the defendant has violated any of the Melyi | officer. ' nC. Lacke conditions of this judgment. y ! conditions of this judgment. DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY: ASSAULT ON FEMALE: _ y | 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, May 19th, 1953 ie _— NON-SUPPORT ate By consent of couns el for th vs Solicitor for the State, the cabo ie en tad the nued Elvy D. Sigman until the August Term of this court that the defendant pay into the ePFics condition Clerk Superior Court the sum of $30.00 of the for the use and benefit of John Thomas oa infant son of the defendant of the age a years, now in custody of the mother = ; Paine in Iredell County; the first payment to : d child or before the first day of June, 1953 ant rst day of each month hereafter until ie Term of this Court. i} the August oo RECKLESS DRIVING udgment heretof i vs as follows: ore entered is hereby amended Stanford Lowell Lambert, Jr The defendant shall not drive an automobi except when his mother or father is rar his company during said Twelve-months period “GRAND JURY REPORT MAY TERM, 1953 The Grand Jury found True Bills of Indictment on all cases that were passed on that were presented by the Solicitor. Committees were appointed to inspect the following County Properties: County Jail The Iredell County Jail was inspected May 18, 1953. At the present time, there are the following prisoners: 1 colored woman, 6 colored men, 1 white woman and 14 white men, making a total of 22 inmates. The kitchen was spotless and the inmates quarters all in good condition. There are no improvements to be suggested. County Home We find the County Home in excellent condition. There are 15 white men, 16 white women, 5 colored men and 5 colored women, making a total of 41 inmates. Prison Camp Prison Camp was inspected and found in excellent condition, maintaining 4 Grade "A" rating. County Court House The Court House is in very good condition with the exception of the walls in the Tax Listing Office, which should be water proofed as suggested in Grand Jury's report for the January Term, 1953. Records of the Justice of Peace are in order. The Grand Jury also suggests that all Witness fees be taken care of 4° g00n , as possible. The Grand Jury, at this time, wishes to comment on the excellent record th . at the High ‘Sheriff has maintained for Iredell County. L. W. Rab IN THE SUPE Tuesday, May 19th, 1953 ————#8t re ee ae es dR Sonera Be LEE gh Siete Ge Ra ae 8 eaten eas Ep MRO 4 OR BS POR Wr PEO SPRITES we oT ee a Oe i aa “GRAND JURY REPORT on Monday, Jan. 26, 1953, the Judge in his ch arge to the Grand Jur y requested an inspec tion of the County Schools. Due to limited time during this session of Court, @ notation was made inthe Grand Jury's Report that one day be taken f aken for this inspection before the May Term of Court. During this Inspection, we find the schools to be under very competent en leadership. transportation facilities are excellent with the exception of one bus which ic has no heating system. All Drivers Permits are in order. We find some of the buildings are in good condition, others are in very much need of repair. painting and roof repairing. school of Chestnut Grove. supply. No. 1845 State vs Haskell Mayfield No, 1882 State vs Lonnie Shuford C-18 No. 1856 State vs William ForrestSigmon Mo. 1857 State Vs Quince Shoemaker ‘to, 1858 State vs Raymon Saunders Spann There has been very much repair work going on, such as We suggest immediate attention be given the Colored This school is reported not to have sufficient water /s/ L. W. Raby L. W. Raby (Foreman ) ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill BREAKING & ENTERING Defendant enters a plea of .Guilty to Forcible Trespass which piea the State will accept. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County fr a term of Eight (8) Months, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This prison sentence is suspended and the defendant is hereby placed on probation for a period of Three (3) Years under the supervision of the N. C. Probation Commission f the laws of this State subject to the provisions of Uf and the rules and orders of said Commission. That as special conditions of probation ordered by the Court, the defendant shall: 1. Pay the cost on or before August 1953 Term. DRIVING DRUNK t Nisi Sci Fa Defendant called and failed. Judgmen and Capias. Instanter Process. DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the Term. a oe rer Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Capias- lled and failed. Instanter Process. 4 | 529 2 ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, May 19th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, May 19th, 1953 ee a a en tet atten sen POSSESSION FOR SALE i Hy /Nos. 1864 & 1865 { PEEPING TOM fo, 1678 j Seek tau i State { Continued for the Term, . j a vs 4 Bredsh gilmer Sherrill | 1 Bunar radshaw | serra ho, 1883 } FORNICATION & ADULTERY. YNo. 1869 { NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE mate | Remanded to Mooresville Recorderts Court. Wai State " “efendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sej ‘ vs | | vs | Fa and capias. Instanter Capias. “BH yonroe Crabb Hale Willie Phillips } No. 1877 } POSSESS FOR SALE NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR ft State t Continued for the Term. vs f ; Emma Clark | iNo. 1801 | William Philo Witherspoon . | ‘No. 1802 } AID & ABETT IN DRIVING DRUNK ‘ i State { Continued. ; i! ' vs f ! it Mack Leonard Rash Hay \No. 1803 ni State et vs reid Robert Garfield Lawrene,Jr | \No. 1808 } DRIVING DRUNK af eH State | Continued. a Vs { at { Be, Hey Ue Louis W McKesson, Jr } ’ No. 1837 | LARCENY 4 State { Continued. “a | vs ss Tommie Stikeleather { et - * a | +No. 1838 & 1839 } ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON-INTENT TO KILL: vad ON ad i State ) BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY ; ‘ | vs ' Continued. We i i Eugene Clifford Emerson { HT} \Nos. 1840 & 1841 | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY: ae State } ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON - INTENT TO KILL i Oe | vs 4 Continued. Wh + Oy eae ) James Gray Hemmings { Ws bis | ‘No. 1846 | MANSLAUGHTER ik Aaa . State | Continued. ; " ‘ vs j ; | pl Otis Horace Howie { ee / a | 'No. 1866 LARCENY OF AUTO ie State Continued. sg vs =a Walter D Peacock, Jr. \No. 1855 DRIVING DRUNK ies State Continued. ie vs Edgar Thomas Lunsford } DRIVING DRUNK | ) State { Continued. me vs { ' DRIVING DRUNK Continued. ‘No. 1863 FAIL TO KEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL bk State Continued. Hdl vs ay otamey Head ‘No. 1873 DRIVING DRUNK til Monday M state Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nis This Honorable Court takes a recess Um vs Fa and capias. $500.00 Bond. . Robert S Brigman ** 10300 otclock A. M. orning, May 25th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Monday Morni May 25th, 1953, at 10:00 ofclock, with Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiat: and Holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term i989 present and presiding. » 2993, J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court th names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for thi the Second Week of the May Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior Court, ‘eae i 3 Pane Py ney “a ae fe W. L. Morrison Fred Slane, Jr. E. R. Douglas 5 oe D. E, Threatte W. P. Frazier Edward Y. Sweet Le C. Stikeleather William A Sharpe W. L. Alexander J. R. Halyburton William N. Morrow C. E. Keiger L. L. Green Jay Ge. Cook Roy R. Sherrill Ee H. Gurley C. E. Baker J. M. Blackwelder K. M. McInnis A. Fuller Sams, Jr , . Zeno W. Proctor R. E. Fox,Sr. J. Ervin Chambers, Sr. D. S. Brewer, Jr. Miss Edith Head John V. Barger E. F. Billings H. C. Hawthorne James E. Creedmore W. C. Chambers N. C. Sharpe O. C. Stonestreet E. L. Estes W. L. Morrison, Roy R. Sherrill, 0. C. Stonestreet and E. R. Douglas were excused by Dector’s certificates. E. H. Gurley, J. Ervin Chambers, Sr and R. E. Fox,Sr. were not returned. Jay G. Cook has mental disorder. The following men constitute what shall hereafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: D. E. Threatte, J. R. Halyburton, L. L. Green, J. M. Blackwelder, Zeno W. Proctor, H.C. Hawthorne, N. S. Sharpe, Fred Slane, Jr., W. P. Frazier, 4.C. Stikeleather, W. L. Alexander and Edward Y. Sweet. +No. 5516 ! Hazel Knox Lackey ' vs { ! Melvin Clyde Lackey DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being druly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as Follows: North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Hazel Knox Lackey ' vS { Issues Melvin Clyde Lackey i 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 9 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint: Answer: Yes 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived of separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution William H Parks, Jr R. M. Walker i: M. C. Dagenhart 2 SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 cect ener this action? Answer Yes North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County yasel Knox Lackey i wi 4 JUDGMENT yelvin Clyde Lackey This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, Judge presiding over the May Civil Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court, and being neard before said Honorable Zed V. Nettles, and a Jury, the following issues vere submitted to the Jury: 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for nore than six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? if r h they lived separate 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they 1 oa : itution of this action? and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution © . a 4 ’ 1) " The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes ". It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be forever dissolved, and that the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Melvin Clyde Lackey, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk. May 25, 1953. zed V. Nettles __ =e Judge Presiving Yo. 5511 | DIVORCE ‘noe duly sworn and oe . 1" being duly : Marvin Woodlief | ee a issues submitted to it as Vs } empanelled answ i Susie Partin Woodlief follows: . rior Court North Carolina In the Supe Irede] ] County Marvin Woodlief ! ISSUES Vs. | Susie PartinWoodlief | of the State of North Carolina for 1, Has the plaintiff been a resident ; f this action: tion 0 tore than six months next preceding the institu Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT son We Kod TH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Marvin Woodlief | VSe 4 JUDGMENT Susie Partin Woodlief | This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, Judge presiding over the May Civil Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Ceurt, and being heard before said Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted to the Jury: l. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be forever dissolved, and that the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Susie Partin Woodlief, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk. This May 25, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 V Ao. 5512 DIVORCE flie Se Stallings The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and vs empanelled answere the issues submitted to it as Mex Le Stallings follows: jorth Carolina Sk <i Sees dom Iredell County May Term, 1953 pllieS. Stallings Plaintiff 7° ISSUES Yex L. Stallings Defendant I Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes II Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes Ti Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other : : ° : ‘ 9 for two years next preceding the bringing of this action: Answer: Yes i in the Superior Court North Carolina n the sup m, 1953 Iredell] County May Tern, 2 Ellie S, Stallings Plaintiff vs Mex L. Stallings Defendant on to r +s Honor, Zeb Ve This cause coming to be heard and being heard before His ‘ Term 1953, of the Superior Court ’ ee ot i j the May ge Presiding and a jury at j . endant has been personally f lume County and it appearing to the Court that de aving been submitted t o and answered Served with process, and the following issues h 'y the jury lly married as alleged in the 1. Were the plaintiff and he defendant lawfu Complaint? Answer; "Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 ! i, i, / | 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Ellie i , : S. Stallings, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Mex L. Stallings, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 25 day of May, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding * & 8&8 & © 2&2 SS fF \ No. 5501 } DIVORCE Nathan Lyerly { The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and vs |} empanelled answere the issues submitted to it as f Violet B. Lyerly follows: NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Nathan Lyerly t Plaintiff vs | ISSUES Violet B. Lyerly, Defendant { 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a reddent of the State of North Carolina for Six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes. LE SeeS. a eo oe oe Sees IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 “ 529 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT yorTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY May term, 1953 Lyerly hathan ©Y" Plaintiff ae JUDGMENT j t B. Lyerly a Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of narriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. 5-25-53 Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding DIVORCE The Divorce Jury # empanelled answers the issue as follows: ‘} No. 5487 ' Marie Houston Owens 1 vs | Ralph Owens, ' 1" being duly sworn and s submitted to it NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT REDELL COUNTY Narie Houston Owens, Plaintiff ! VS. ISSUES Ralph Owens, Defendant j ermarry, and are they now husband and 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant int wife, as alleged in the Compalint? Answer: Yes n the Complaint? 2. Did the defendant commit adultery 4 alleged i ie lina f North Caro 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State ° action? for more than six months prier to the commencement of this Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Marie Houston Owens, Plaintiff VS. JUDGMENT Ralph Owens, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the 4 es Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before his Honor, Zeb V. Nettles. |) > aa Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant, as set out in the records: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Marie Houston Lwens, and the defendant, Ralph Owens, be, and the same are, dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. 5-25-53 Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding x* * *« * K DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: ‘No. 5491 ! Minnie Bell Moore Lambert § vs { Raymond Lambert { In the Superior Court. May Term, 1953. North Carolina, IREDELL COUNTY. Minnie Bell Moore Lambert by her next friend, Macon M. Simons VS. ISSUES Raymond Lambert 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: _yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of Nort for more than six months before the commencement of this action, complaint? Answer: h carolina as alleged in - i iS a & SIROTA IE EEN EEE i nate ea ce sO IR) MERE RIE MP te TERT a a Sia es aa a ae A ki aa aa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 Yorth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term, 1953. Minnie Bell Moore Lambert, by j her next friend, Macon vs = . JUDGMENT ! gaymond Lambert This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Zeb V. Nettles, judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of ambert, matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Minnie Bell Moore L and the defendant, Raymond Lambert, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. May 25, 1953. Zeb V Nettles Judge Presiding Mo. 5529 Bina Loui DIVORCE . , — —_— : The Divorce Jury #1" being or on Marvin Garland Greer | empanelled answers a | follows: OR COURT NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERI 53 MIXED TERM IREDELL COUNTY MAY, 1953 M MNA LOUISE GREER 4 v. ' ISSUES MARVIN GARLAND GREER ' t lawfully married to each other as l. Were the plaintiff and the defendan alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes f North Carolina 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State © tion? ‘er six months next preceding the bringing of wee & cement 3. Have the plaintiff and th g of this action? other for two years next preceding the bringin Answer: Yes a2 ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 NORTH CAROLiNA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY, 1953 MIXED TERM EDNA LOUISE GREER ( ve } JUDGMENT MARVIN GARLAND GREER 4 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Zeb V, Nettles, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the May 1953 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action for an absolute divorce on the grounds of two years separation having been instituted by the plaintiff : in the Superior Court of Wilkes County, North Carolina, and be said Court upon application, verified petition of the plaintiff, Ordered transfered to the Superior Court of Rowan County, North Carolind and thereafter transfered to the Superior Ceurt of Iredell County, State aforesaid, notice of which last transfer having been duly given defendant by publication; and it further appearing to the Court that EAE os. defendant has been properly served with process by publication, and the following it issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married to each other as alleged in the Yomplaint? Answer: "Yes." 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? a Answer: "Yes." 4 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes," “o NOW, THEREFORE, on Motion of Burke & Burke, attorneys for the plaintiff, it is iy ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, Edna Louise Greer be and she is heré- a oy by granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Marvin Garland Greer, and that the 4 bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, And it further appearing to the Court and the Court finding as 4 fact, that there is one minor child of said marriage, Edith Geraldine Greer who has been and it living with her mother, the plaintiff, since the separation of her parents; s further appearing to the Court and the “ourt finding as a fact that the plaintiff * of said minor dild, and ody of a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control that the best interests of said child would be served by being in the cust her said mother; nted full IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the plaintiff be and she is hereby gra IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 et maaan and complete custody and control of said minor child until the further order of this Court . And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. ge This 25 day of May, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles jabib Judge Presiding hw fo. 5447 forth Carolina +n the Superior Court Iredell County March Term, 1953 Richard Dix Justice | Plaintiff ; ke vs Judgment Barbara Bowling Justice Defendant i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor, led V. Nettles, Judge Presiding and a jury at the March Term, 1953, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that defendant has been personally served with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jur:: as alleged by the d the defendant lawfully married 1. Were the plaintiff an complaint? Answer: "Yes." 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina on? eding the bringng of this acti for more than six months next prec Answer; "Yes." nt lived separate and apart from each 3. Have the plaintiff and the defenda this action? other for two years next preceding the bringing of Answer: "Yes," d. adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, ’ Now, therefore, it is ordere ed an absolute divorce f rom the Richard Dix Justice, be and he is hereby grant mony heretofore existing —. Barbara Bowling Justice and the bonds of matri y are hereby dissolved. b *tween the plaintiff and defendant be and the cost of this action to And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the be taxed by the Clerk. as of the gth day of March, 1953+ » V. Nettles ——4htrresiding s 2,655 This judgment signed, nunc pro tunc, This 25th day of May, 1953. * * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 follows: 4No. 5515 | DIVORCE N. A. Lewis i The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and vs empanelled answers the issues submitted ta a s Isabell J. Lewis In the Superior Court North Carolina, May Term, 1953 Iredell County N. A. Lewis } VS. { ISSUES Isabell J. Lewis ) l. Didthe plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, and have they lived continuously separate and apart from each other for more than two years immediately prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina six months prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1953 +» 7 N. A. LEWIS } vs. ' JUDGMENT ISABELL J. LEWIS | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court infavor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudbed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, are set aside by the Court, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute the defendant. Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding ke at this term of the Superior as set out in the and they divorce from y —) rt ee” PSG RET Rt SNE A EET RN et e ee a LS eee > IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 ee COLO C _ nn eee — fo. 5427 yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY ristine Robinson ! " Plaintiff ! VS. PETITION AND MOTION jenjamin Robinson, Defendant. { NOW COMES the above named Defendant into Court through his Attorney, Buren jurney, and enters a special appearance and moves to dismiss and quash the above entitled proceeding far the reasons as follows: 1. That this Court does not have jurisdiction or authority to hear and determine the matters in controversy, said matters being exclusively in the jurisdiction of the State of New York. 2. That the act under which this proceeding is instituted is un-constitutional and that this Court is without authority to hear the same. 3. That the Defendant has never had an opportunity to defend himself in the State of New York where the crime is alleged to twe been committed, it any, and he had not had the opportunity of confronting his accusers and cross examine Plaintiff's witnesses nor offer evidence in his own behalf. 4. That the Defendant has been denied the right of Trial by Jury as ed States and of the State of guaranteed to him under the Constitution of the Unit North Carolina. proceeding as certified to Wherefore this Defendant prays theCourt that the be dismissed, and that the Defendant go hence this Court from the State of New York without day and recover his cost in this behalf expended. Buren Jurney Atty. t the facts set forth in Benkamin Robinson, being duly sworn deposes and says tha his knowledge except as to those the foregoing Petition are true to the Best of ief and to those he believes it to be true. Matters stated on information and bel Ben jamin Robinson § : ubscribed and sworn to before me, this the 19th day of May, 1953. L. L. Nesbit Deputy Clerk Superior court IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1953 Monday, May 25th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Christine Robinson 4 Plaintiff VSe ORDER Benjamin Robinson Defendant. ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this the May Term, 1953 of the Iredell County Superior Court before his Honor Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiding and being heard upon Motion of the Defendant for dismissal as filed herein and the Court having examined said verified Motion and Petition and also a record in the case and the Court being of the opinion that it does not have authority undwr the Constitution and the Laws of this State to hear and determine the matters in controversy: It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Defendant Benjamin Robinson be released and discharged from custody of this court and the case so far as this Court is concerned is hereby dismissed. It is ordered that the record be remanded by the Clerk of this Court to the State of New York to the end that said State and its constituted authorities may take such additional action, if any, as they may be advised. Zeb V. Nettles Judge of the Superior Court kek Kk eK we eK “No. 5190 {| Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: } D. E. Threatte, J. R. Halyburton, L. L. Green, John D. Beaver | J. M. Blackwelder, Zeno W. Proctor, He C. rs {| Hawthorne, N. S. Sharpe, Fred Slane, Jr. We Pe Plaintiff } Frazier, L. C. Stikeleather, W. lL. Alexander and } Edward Y. Sweet. vs i i Clester Roy Beaver, i ISSUE ' ‘ Defendant Did the defendant execute and deliver to the plaintiff a conveyance of a one-half interest in the land described in the complaint in fee simple? Answer: Yes a ee te ee br cs tee Tee gg mw RRS a pe at Se ae Ri 8 Ao. 1799 State vs Goldie Mae Setzer w-F-26 No. 1847 State vs fmanuel Tucker 0-23 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK Monday, May 25th, 1953 een MAY TERM, 1953 SPEEDING The Defendant through her attorney enter s guilty as charged in the warrant. : whe Judgment of the Court is that the defendant é ay a fine of $50.00 and pay the cost of this iste” ' It is further orderedthat the judgment on the bond is made absolute to be discharged on payment of the cost. SPEED ING The judgment heretofore entered in this case is stricken out and the following judgment entered in lieu thereof: Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Six Months, to be assigned to work on the State Highways under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for a term of three (3) Years on the following expressed conditions: 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of this action. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways of the State of N.C. for a period of One (1) Year and that he surrender his driver's license now to be transmitted to the Director of Public Safety, Raleigh, N. C.,together with a certified copy of this judgment. Permission is given to the Court at any subsequent term to place this sentence into effect if it should appear that the defendant has violated any of the conditions of this judgment. H+ 5497 } Jury sworn and empanelled. . Katherine D Sloop { At the close of the plaintiff's testimony, the Court VS } withdraws a juror and orders a mistrial. William E Sloop { Wo. 5320 John Henry Jones vs Mabe! Jones ecenooe nner errr rnnnn= Continued te Rage annccoweeeosoesoe**" j d fio, 5474 Geneva Coleman Gragg vs Lewis Gragg -----""""""" Continue vio. 5502 Winifred Oscar Wright vs Maxine Gladys Wright --------"~ Continued coccacscessContinued dio. 5513 Dorothy Moore Leonard vs John Leonard ----~-"~ ontir ateee cise eenahnanene een eee ts Continued Wo. 5517 LB Spillman vs Treava Spillman -----°""" v This Honorable Court takes a recess until at 9330 o'clock A. Me Tuesday Morning, May 26th, 1953, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 Tuesday, May 26th, 1953 Tuesday, May 26th, 1953 een ce ii rn ecm Yo. 5235 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournpent on Tuesday Morning Clarence Smith eee ’ John i J. M. Blackwelder, H. C. Hawthrone, N. S. Sharpe, May 26th, 1953, at 9:30 otclock A. M. M Troutman W. P. Frazier, L. C. Stikgeather, W. L. Alexander, Ernest D. S. Brewer, Jr., John V. Barger and Wm. H. Parker, Jr No. 5231 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY May 1953 Civil Term M. T. Pratt Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: C. E. Keiger, D. S. Brewer, Jr. John V. Barger, Wm. H, Paris VS. Jr., Wm A. Sharpe, Wm. N. Morrow, C. E. Barker, R. M, ' Walker, M. C. Dagenhart, E. F. Billings, W. C. Chambers ang Comer Huffman E. L. Estes. ISSUES 1. Were the damages to Plaintiff's automobile caused by the negligence of the Defendant? Answer: Yes 2. How much is the Plaintiff entitled to recover from the Defendant by way of damages to the Plaintiff's automobile? $412.35 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. May 1953 Civil Term M. T. Pratt { VS. | JUDGMENT Comer Huffman { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, Judge presiding and the jury, and the issues having been answered by the jury as follows: 1. Were the damages to Plaintiff's automobile caused by the negligence of the Defendant? Answer: _Yes__ 2. How much is the Plaintiff entitled to recover from the Defendant by way of damages to the Plaintiff's automobile? Answer: _ $412.35 IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff will rece with interest over the sum of Four Hundred .Twelve Dollars .Thirty-Five Cents ($412.35), from date from the defendant; and that the Plaintiff recover the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. esday, a recess until Wedn This the 26th day of May, 1953. This Honorable Court takes , Nettles ns. cer prettding 1953, at 9:30 otfclock A. M.- aa. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --------- MAY TERM, 1953 Wednesday, May 27th, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday ’ May 27th, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MAY TERM, 1953 No. 5466 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. MARY S. SLOAN 4 VS. } JUDGMENT HENRY GRADY SLOAN 4 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that an order was made in this cause at the Superior Court of Rowan County, in Salisbury, North Carolina, directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff, the wife of the defendant, the sum of $50.00 per month for the support of plaintiff and their two minor children, said payment to begin on the lst. day of March, 1953, and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant has failed to pay any sum whatsoever under this order of the Court, and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant has on hands or deposited in a bank at Kannapolis the sum of approximately $800.00, and has on hands a note and mortgage deed executed to said defendant by S. T. Sloan and wife, and it further appearing to the Court that a Receiver should be appointed by the Court to handle and manage said money and note and mortgage deed, and to pay the plaintiff such sums as the Court may direct: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, be appointed such receiver, and is authorized and directed to proceed to take into his possession said money belonging to the defendant, and also, to take into possession the said note and mortgage deed and to collect the same as it becomes due and payable. No additional bond is to be given, said receivership to be covered by the bond or bonds already given by him as Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County- It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that said receiver is authorized and directed to pay the plaintiff on the lst. day of June, 1953, the sum of $200.00 for the support of plaintiff and the support of the said minor children, and the sum of $50.00 on the lst. day of each and every month thereat : s ; rs This cause is retained for further orde until further orders of this Court. of the Court. This May 27th, 1953. Zeb V, Nettles Judge Presiding eek KOK Kk ek eae ed Se eee eee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- MAY TERM, 1953 Wednesday, May 27th, 1953 Ho. 5206 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Iredell County s L. Miller 4 a Plaintiff VSe JUDGMENT i ' Wy. Ross Day, George H. Smith, fred W. Hudson, and Joe I. Mills ] Defendants ; This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, led Ve Nettles, Judge Presiding at the May 1953 term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel for the parties that the matters in controversy between the plaintiff and the defendants have been agreed upon and that the defendant, George H. Smith, has agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of Four Hundred Fourteen and 67/100 Dollars; that the defendant, Joe lI. Mills, has agreed to pay the plaintiff the sum of Sixty Two and no/100 Dollars; that the defendant, W. Ross Day has agreed for judgment to be entered against himfor the sum of Eiht Hundred Twenty Nine and no/100 Dollars with interest from Nov. 23, 1950 and the the plaintiff has agreed to same; he Court that a verified complaint was filled And it further appearing to t and summons issued in this action on the 18th day of December, 1951, and that a copy of the complaint and the summons were served upon the defendant, Fred W. and that no answer, demurrer, or Hudson, on the 20th day of December, 1951, ndant, Fred W. Hudson, and no extension other pleading has been filed by the defe of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which plead- ings may be filed has expired; that the yerified complaint set forth a cause of in the form of a promissory um of $1,658.00 with interest note to pay action for breach of an express contract 4 sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the § at the rate of 6% per annum; and that the from the 23rd day of November, 1950, endant, Fred wW. Hudson, for plaintiff desires to take judgment against the def namely, $476.685 only the part of said sum and interest for which he is liable, sel that And it further appearing to the Court from statement of coun e-fourth of the costs of t f the costs of this ac costs of this , his action; that Sorge H. Smith has agreed to pay on tion; Fred W, Hudson ought to be taxed with one-fourth © with one-half of the and that W.Ross Day has consented to be taxed a *tion as the same are taxed by the Clerk; adjudged, laintiff Now, therefore, it is ordered, and decreed that the Pp 14,267, from the ‘ave and recover of the defendant, George H- Smith, the sum of $4l46O/s Cass eee I IT — -_ <= — ae aia por & WF » se ae. oe ee eee ; me 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1953 Wednesday, May 27, 1953 —— ———— Sa a rE defendant, Joe I. Mills the sum of y62.00, from the defendant, Fred W. Hudson, the sum of $476.68, and from W. Ross Day the sum of $829.00 with interest from November 23, 1950; and the said W. Ross Day is taxed with one-half of the costs of this action, the said Fred W. Hudson is taxed with one-fourth of the costs o this action, and the said George H. Smith is taxed with one-fourth of the costs of this action. This the 27th day of May, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding, May 1953, Term Iredell County Superior Court Consented to: C. B. Winberry Attorney for W. Ross Day William S. Neel Attorney for plaintiff Lewis, Lewis and Simons Attorneys for defendant, George H. Smith By J. G. Lewis McLaughlin & Battley Attorney for Joe I. Mills By W. R. Battley kK OK KK Kk Ke OK ‘No. 5495 North Carolina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY George I. Wike ! vs. ' JUDGMENT William A.Sloop T/A ! Home Appliance & Electric Company ! This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiding over the Superior Court of Iredell County, May Civil Term, 1953, and it appearing to the Court that summons in the above entitled action was issued on March l?th, 1953; that the Sheriff of Iredell County made his return on said summons showing that the defendant, William A. Sloop was not to be found in Iredell County; that service of summons by publication has been had upon the defendant, William A. Sloop; And it further appearing to the Court that a warrant of attachment was issued on March 18, 1953 ordering the seizure and attachment of all of t of the defendant, William A, Sloop, which might be found in Iredell County; that said warrant of attachment was returned on the 1éth day of March, 1953, showing ant that certain personal property held by Carl G. Smith in the name of the defend William A. Sloop had been attached and taken into custody of the Sheriff; that notice of the issuing and of the return of the warrant of a attachment was duly cessive advertised in the Statesville Daily newspaper, once a week for four suc es SSR SES I gee ee ora gett eee aes Qe: ne at pares cress sae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ MAY TERM, 1953 ; Wednesday, May 27, 1953 weeks a5 required by law; That the time for filing pleadings on the part of the defendant has elapsed and that no answer, demurrer or other pleading has been filed by the defendant; Ans, it further, appearing to the Court that this is an action prought to recover the sum of $1,392.00 due the plaintiff by the defendant, William A. Sloop on a mote signed by said Defendant; that Carl G. Smith was prought into this action because he was holting certain personal property of the defendant, William A. Sloep, as bailee; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover judgment against the defendant, William A. Sloop for the sum of $1,392.00, together with the costs of this action; that the attached property held by the Sheriff of Iredell County be paid into the the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court in order that said net proceeds may be applied to the satis- faction of the foregoing judgment, either in pro tanto, or in full; that any surplus over and above the amount of said judgment, namely $1,392.00 together with the costs of this action, remain in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court for the benefit of the defendant, William A. Sloop. And it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that this judgment shall be operative only to the estent of the net proceeds from the property of the defendant, William A. Sloop, which has been attached, and that this judgment shall not operate as a personal judgment against said defendant, samaniili loop. This 27 day of May, 1953- zeb V. Nettles iia Judge Presiding kok eR KK OK KR KF me set \ BADLY WEAPON Trg ASSAULT WITH DE _ It appearing to the Court that at >. i : j ourt, the defendant entered a ple eS a ae , ly Weapon and was given Efard McKinley Lackey guilty of Assault with Deadly pe Gus es — a t of Twenty-Four (24) months in the os gs to be assigned to work under of Iredell County, nd Public Works tat te Highway 4 ; a, . pe . ended on condition that ommission, i itness $1000.00, t pay the prosecuting W e oe ak wt eeung250+00 to be paid at ~ i te ; i It further appearing to the Cour a ies has failed to make said paymen t failed to pay tae coe The Cour in the suspended genvente: vtelat dant fact that the defen sentence f said suspended othwith placed into e fore, ordered thie kof this Court ffect and the Cler a lenee commitment under the terms the said judgment. sentence Susp EE —_— oe oe ee ro oO Ww Ww IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 28, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Wednesday, May 27, 1953 ie I | | /No. 5367 + dure euben ont Sibemed teas This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday | John Rell — PE say Ma es Y. Sweet, A. Fuller yorning, May 2eth, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. | > . « Ej. Keiger, Wm. A. | Mrs. Ida M Keller & { Morrow, C. B. Barker, R. M cae ne | husband R. L. Keller } Dagenhart, E. F. Billings, W. C. Chambers } ’ ? + . Chambers and si Ko. 5367 “Ae * r | © jon Rell Wallace, } ‘ | . sa Plaintiff \ if : VS. ISSUES i irs, Ida M. Keller and ) f ; % Husband, QR. he Keller, { ; ; Defendants. { i ‘ | “ l. Did the plaintiff and defendant, Mrs. Ida M. Keller, Make a | PM contract to build and construct a dam and other work described in the complaint? 1 ~ 3 | ee Answer:__Yes ‘ | | - 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant, R. L. Keller, make a contract to SM sild and construct a dam and other work described in the complaint? Answer: Yes Rie aoe | ey oa fa 3. Was such contract breached? ; 4 | ie Answer: ___No Vb / Ee 4. What amount, if anything, is the Defendant, Mrs. Ida M. Keller, as Hq indebted to the plaintiff? . aR he | Answer: $600.00 e , = 5. What amount, if anything is the defendant, R. L. Keller, indebted to ' the plaintiff? Answer: _$600.00 ————— (are page He Fr iy) | This Honorable Court takes a recess until .Thursday Morning, 1953,at 9330 o'clock A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -------- MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 28, 1953 Y 5A6 i f | JNo. 5235 NORTH CAROLINA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. | John Clarence Smith, | Plaintiff, | alae | ISSUES | Ernest M. Troutman, | Defendant. i 1. Was the plaintiff injured by the n i : sashes aw Gg Ee 3 y e negligence of the Defendant as ANSWER Yes ‘ as 2. Did the Plaintiff by his own lige i Te as alleged in the Answer? ; Se ee oe LOR TR Ties PGP, OMe acer ae ANSWER__No : i 3 Wh a ites at amount of damage is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the oa ie | NSWER__2,750.00 _ . ig | 5 Pi NORTH CAROLINA . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ke IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM 1953. m4 oe ta John Clarence Smith, Plaintiff -VS= - JUDGMEN Ernest M. Troutman, _— Defendant - | OTROS aR za 2 e OTST hi eal ™ : ‘ : This cause comint on to be heard before his Honor Zeb V. Nettles, and a Jury id the jury having r ae a : and the jury havine answered the issues submitted to them as contained in the $2,750.00 ec ¥) } ; a sy : + 2 record, and having returned a verdict of Two Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty | Dollars in favor of the plaintiff; 184 = IS, THEREFORE, ordered,adjudged, and decreed hy the Court that the plaintitf recover of the defendant the sum of Two Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty ($2,750.00) Dollars with interest from the 29th day of May, 1953, until paid. i IT IS FURTHER ordered that the Defendant be taxed with the cost of this action. This 24th day of May, 1953. >t IF GLEE OT Zeb V. Nettles JUDGE PRESIDING “| The Plaintiff moved the Court to set aside the issue of damages as being inadequate, and the Court having denied said motion, the plaintiff excepts and 0 the signing of the foregoing judgment, the plaintiff again excepts. The plaintiff gives notice of appeal, in open court, to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Further notice waived. Plaintiff given sixty days to serve case on appeal. foe thirty days to serve countercase or exceptions. Appeal bond set J PRESIDING APPEAL ENTRIES BY DEFENDANT To the signing of the Judgment as a , ears in the record, t _ to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for errors ana aa a. of appeal given in open court; further notice wa aan n the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) adjudged to be sufficient> . a is efendant is allowed sixty days (60) to serve case on appeal, and the Plaintd allowed thirty (30) thereafter to serve countercase, or file exceptions. This May 28, 1953. Vv. Nettles —sreg ding: oS . r : udge res ng * * ts he Defendant exceP assigned and ~ ived. Appe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 2&th, 1953 Ko» 5190 North Carolina i In the Superior Court, rredell County | May Term, 1953. D. Beaver - Plaintiff, { VS JUDGMENT Clester Roy Beaver, Defendant. j This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor, led V. Nettles, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the May Term, 1953, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the jury having answered the issue submitted to it as follows: "Q, Did the defendant execute and deliver to the plaintiff a conveyance of a one-half interest in the land described in the Compaint in fee simple? Answer. Yes" It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that W. R. Battley be, and he is hereby appointed as a Commissioner in this action to execute and deliver to John D. Beaver, plaintiff herein, a deed, conveying 4 one-half fee to the land as described in Paragraph undivided interest absolutely and in Tree of the plaintiff's Complaint herein and more particularly described as follows: Tracts Nos. Two (2) and Three (3) according to a plat of the Je Ae Iredell County, North Carolina, and more Davidson Farm made by Grier and Grier, particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West boundary line of said survey, said point being distant S. 2-3/4° W. 771 feet from the extreme Northwestern corner point in the Western boundary 1931 feet to a 45° BE. 267 feet of said survey; thence S. 2-3/4° We r of Tract No. 43 thence Se line, being the Northwestern corne | f e within 7 point, said point being the extreme Southeastern corner Ol th ract No. 7 of said survey; described tract and also the Northwestern corner of T king the extreme Northeastern corner of 5 Oo thence N. 5° E. 1224 feet to a point mar 62-3/4 © Ww. 547 feetto 4 point; thence Ne » acres, more the within described tract; thence N. containing 95-° 0 ' 664° W. 232+ feet to a point, the beginniné corner, or less, his judgment be filed in the office It is further ordered that a COPY of t rolina.e of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, North Ca Lone The defendant is taxed with the costs of the act geo V. Nettles uage Pres ng Sernbne Tenant a sate TSE = * i. 7 i senate > 2p Go = aoe a ets > wee : —— = a eed ee = ——<—— = ——- a —-- ee neem para a Rin IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 28, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT yAg™ SECOND WEEK --------- MAY TERM, 1953 nt Thursday, May 28, 1953 Appeal Entries AND it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff, within the time Upon the coming in of the verdict, the Defendant moved to set aside the tted by statute, namely, on the 14th day of June, 1952, filed a Notice and ’ ‘ permi verdict and have a new trial. claim of Lien against the property of the defendant, Mrs. Ida M. Keller, located Motion was denied and defendant excepted. . in Coddle Creek Township, Iredell County, North Carolina, and more particularly After the overruling of the defendant's motion to set aside the verdict 4 follows gescribed aS 10 : and have a new trial, Judgment upon the verdict, as set out in the Judgment, was | DESCRIPTIO! ’ gn N signed and the defendant excepted. : Tract No. 1 -BEGINNING at an iron stake, G. W. Liner'ts Corner on the old W. B. McNeely line; thence with the old McNeely line North THEREUPON, defendant appealed in open court to the Supreme Court of 69 degs. West 300 feet to a stake, J. L. Gordon's new corner on . North Carolind, further notice waived. Appeal bond was fixed at $100.00. Consent 7 the old McNeely line; thence with the new Gordon line South 24 ; : : : ; bc degs. West 350 feet to a atake, Gordon's new corner; thence with and in discretion of the Court, the defendant allowed sixty days in which to e Gordon's new line South 69 degs. East 300 feet to G. W. Liner's He ar : : h w Gordon line; thence with G. W. Liner's 1i prepare and serve case on appeal, and the phintiff thirty days th corner on the ne ’ Ale ——— i] — P EEE | North 24 degs. East 350 feet to the BEGINNING, same being that certain tract of land conveyed to Mrs. Ida M. Keller by Jd. L. Gordon (widower) by deed of Feb. 12, 1949, and recorded in Book a Zeb V. Nettles an 206, at page 147, Iredell County Registry. Judge Presiding ; to serve counter-case or excevtions. a a a. Z = Tract No. 2 -BEGINNING at an iron stake, Ida Keller Corner on ! oe f A. Me Bullard line; thence North 69 degs. West 500 feet to an | ‘No. 5367 * iron stake; thence with Jack Norris line North 24 degs. East i io 29 feet to an iron stake, Norris corner; thence with Norris ) NORTH CAROLINA p line North 69 degs. West 290 feet to an iron stake; thence i NN U ‘eg - . } ° Hi IN THE SUPERIOR COURS fs North 21 4 degs. East “6 feet to an iron stake, Lackey Corner} H IREDELL COUNTY 3 thence South 73 degs. East 790 feet with I. Se Edminson line “d to an iron stake on Ballard line; thence South 24 degs. West ti} John Rell Wallace, { u 167 feet to the BEGINNING corner; containing 2.11 acres, more i Plaintiff ri or less. (same being that certain tract of land conveyed by HH} ! 4 J. L. Gordon to Ida M. Keller by deed of December 2, 1950, | vs JUDGMENT 4 and recorded in Deed Book 219 at page 214, Iredell County Registry.) | Mrs. Ida M. Keller and bY AND it further appearing to the Court that the said action to enforce husband, R. L. Keller, } y Defendants ba the said Lien was duly commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Zeb V. toh : f he di within the time permitted by law, namely within six months from the date of the filing of the said lien; Nettles, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the May Term of the Sjperior Court of — titled to AND it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is ent Iredell County, and the jury having answered the Issues submitted to them as oa March, 19523 + ,2 . y iar l 4 . pans aiien upon the above-described property dating from the 12th day 01 ! > : ows: ; f laintiff have NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed anes SPE 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant, Mrs. Ida M. Keller, make a contract t0 ‘ | : ach.ab), anh build and construct a dam and other work described in the complaint? + and recover of the defendants the sum of Five-Hundred Dollars \¥ , | Answer:__Yes A interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the 2&th day of May, 1953, until 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant, R. L. Keller, make a contract to puild y Paid; it is hereby stipulated that this Judgment was reduced as indicated by the and construct a dam and other work described in the Complaint? Court on its own motion; that said judgment be and the same is hereby declared to nila ve a lien against the property of the defendant, Mrs- Ida M. Keller, specifically 3. Was such contract breached? described hereinabove, and that said lien against the said property dated from the Hagges indebted l@th day of March, 1952, the day upon which the plaintiff and the a intiff to the Sua if anything, is the plaintiff, Mrs. Ida M. Keller, inde *ntered into the indivisible contract heretofore referred to; and that the plain Answer: _.$600.00 "ecover of the defendants the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. 5, What amount, if anything, is the defendant, R. L. Keller, indebted %° THIS 28th day of May, 1953+ the plaintiff? _ Zeb V. Nettles on siding Answer: $600.00 x * * ) IN THE SUPERIOR CoUuR? aneia Wi THE SUPERIOR COURT 0 BK ecoccsoese MAY TERM, 1953 SECOND WEEK ----- MAY Thursday, May 28, 1953 Thursday, May 2%, 1955 — | : i INo. 5300 Mm Ao. 53°3 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, INA IN TH | | . yoRTH CAROL ‘ N THE SUPERIOR COURT, | IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM 1953. 6 IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM 1953. | R. M. Kambrich, - ! ; Shi i aintiff, Mm jarry O. Shives, . . i ORDER Plaintiff, , { i VSe i W. F. Mackey, ' QRDER ae Defendant. 4 | james Me Sample and W. W. Winters, ) . mm /a Ss. & We Trucking Company, ' .< e This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor Zeb V 7s ; . i Nettles, Judge Presiding, upon a Motion filed by the attorneys of record to have This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before his Honor Zeb V. a; BS cei ee ree 1 sl lee : the Plaintiff disclose the name of the company with which he carried collision | 4; Vettles, Judge Presiding, upon a Demurrer and/or Motion to Strike filed by the ‘ insurance, and to have such insurance carrier made a party to this cause of Demurrer And/Or Motion to I ion; i i ; : ° he reading of the pleadings action; that it appearing from the Motion filed by the Defendant and the argument Defendants; that upon the g E aie Strike, and argument of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the Complaint of counsel, and the information furnished by the attorneys of record of the Plaintiff ; * ees s : : , and that the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 ‘ | . : ha laintif vt i ision i ; pace "E does state a cause of action, i that the Plaintiff carried his collision insurance with the United States Fidelity Se a . ; oy - ; : aie ‘ of the Complaint are necessary and proper. i) and Guaranty Company, which has paid to the Plaintiff the amount it was liable to 3 P eal him for the damage caused by the collision as alleged in the Complaint of this 2 IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Demurrer/And/Or \ / 41] have until June 27, 1953, in that the Defendants wi- action, with the exception of Fifty Dollars ($50.00), aS provided in the deductible 4 which to file an Answer, or otherwise plead. if ih a | Pa Motion to Strike is denied; ' ' Court of Iredell County, Nor clause in the insurance policy, and it further appearing to the Court that the a ee ; : : h Carolina, in nN | United States .Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a proper party to this cause of Entered and signed in the Superior th va ° } action. 2 Statesville, on May 26, 1953. a Di Sep It further appearing to the Court that thi f i ] ig Zeb V._Netties ie h ppearing the Cou 1a is cz f n was pl idj 6 s cause of action was placed on ZEB V. NEIILES, Judge Presiding ee ee — we | the Motion Docket of the Giendar for the May Term 1953 for the Superior Court of APPEAL ENTRIES: to the Supreme Court; 1 . . t : ’ i Iredell County, North Carolinas; that the Clerk stated that after the Calendar was a be ice of appeal id The Defendants excepts and gives not f record ab : Plaintiff given thirty prepared, a copy was properly and promptly forwarded to the attorneys ° 60) days to serve case on appeal set at Fifty Dollars Defendants given sixt counsel for the Plaintiff " y ( . my ($50.00). it for the Plaintiff; that at the hearing upon the Motion, Appeal bond cee ake (30) days to serve countercase. | Zeb V. Nettles ail ZEB Ve NETTLES, Judge Presiding IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United States Gere if it so isd a. = 2 3 % > + 3 Fidelity and Guaranty Company be made a Party Plaintiff and permitted, or file such Fey et desires, to adopt the Complaint heretofore filed by the Plaintiff, pe Or pleadings on its own behalf as it may be advised. Entered and signed in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, in Statesville, on May 2+, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presidiré APPEAL ENTRIES; The Plaintiff excepts and gives notice of appeal to the Supreme Court; Plaintiff given sixty (40) days to serve case on appeal; Defendant given thirty (30) days to serve countercase. Appeal bond set at Fifty Dollars ($50.00)- Zeb V. Nettles n Zeb V. Nettles, Judge presiding ae 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 28, 1953 ene aresetnadeneanetaeeeomekon enemies Defendant Ao. 54,06 North Carolina |} In the Superior Court, Iredell County | May Term, 1953. O. C. Stonestreet, Sr., T/A } ‘ Stonestreet's Cafe, oi Plaintiff i be vs ' { JUDGMENT The Travelers Indemnity Company, ' ey This cause coming on to be heard before Hys Honor, Zeb V. Nettles, Judge iq Presiding at the May Term, 1953, of Iredell Superior Court, and being heard upon agreement of counsel, without a jury, and it appearing tothe Court that the type of loss recovery sought by the plaintiff against the defendant, Indemnity Company, does not come within the terms of the Insurance Policy sued upon and that under oa the terms of said policy, there is no liability on the part of said defendant to the ois said plaintiff; i It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover m1 nothing of the defendant in this action and that the plaintiff be taxed with i the costs. } Zeb V. Nettles i Judge presiding ' i oa ae ‘No. 5323 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM 1953. ba Halbert T. Morrow, Plaintiff, } Vs. 4 . ORDER f -_——_—_— d 4 Harold C.Barnes and Clyde Boan, Defendants. 4 be This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before his Honor Zeb V. Nettles, Judge Presiding, and it appearing from the Motion filed by the Defendants that the Plaintiff carried a collision insurance policy with the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; that since the date of the collision, the insurance company has paid for the loss and damage sustained by the Plaintiff's automobile with the exception df Fifty jPollars ($50.00), as provided in the deductible clause of the insurance policy, and it further appear ine to the Court that the .Defendants have moved to make the insurance company oe Plaintiff on the grounds that the insurance company is the real party in interests and the Court being of the opinion that the Insurance Company of the state of IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 2¢, 1953 er | of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is a proper Party Plaintiff. pennsylvania ’ IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, be made a Party plaintiff, and permitted, it it so desires, to adopt the Complaint heretofore filed yy the Plaintiff, or file such pleadings on its own behalf as it may be advised. Entered and signed in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, c in Statesville, on May 28, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles ZEB V. NETTLES, Judge Presiding. fo, 5263 ORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM 1953 Wrs, Clyde D. Jenkins, ! Plaintiff, ' Vs. ‘. t QRDER Charles W. Lewis and Morrison Furniture & Fixture | Company, Incorporated, Defendants. } ; } j nor V. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before his Honor Zeb Moti i] y endants liettles, Judge Presiding, and it appearing from the Motion filed by the Def isi 2 icy wi Twin States that the Plaintiff carried a collision insurance paicy with the i i i of the collision Insurance Company of Charlotte, North Carolina; that since the date d ; . nanieie d for the loss and damage sustained by the Plaintiff ‘Dollars ($50.00), as provided r appearing to the Court the insurance company has pai in the automobile with the exception of Fifty deductible clause of the insurance policy; and it furthe j any a Party Plaintiff on that the Defendants have moved to make the insurance compan) y any is the real party in interest; and the the grounds that the insurance comp Insurance Company, of Charlotte, Court being of the opinion that the Twin States North Carolina, is a proper Party Plaintiff. ED that the Twin States IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECRE y Plaintiff, and lina, be made @ Part Insurance Company, of Charlotte, North Caro etofore filed by the pt the Complaint her alf as it may be ad ounty, North Carolina, Permitted, if it so desires, to ado vised. Plaintirr, or file such pleadings on its own beh 11 ¢ Entered and signed in the Superior Court of Irede “n Statesville, on May 28, 1953. Zeb V. Nettis age Presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----------- MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 28th, 1953 NO. 5492 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR Court, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Matter of the Custody and } Control of James Ray Hayes and Margaret Ann Hayes, Infants. To the Superintendent of Welfare of Iredell County: In the above entitled matter it appearing to the Court that this is a controversy between the father and mother as to custody and control of the two minor children, and it further appearing to the Court that it will be necessary in order to more fairly determine the custody of said children, that an investiga- tion of the homes of the father and of the mother and of the paternal and maternal erandparents be made by the Superintendent of Welfare of Iredell County: It is, therefore, ordered that the said Superintendent of Welfare of Iredell County shall forthwith have an investigation made of the home of Connie May Hayes and J.W. Hayes, mother and father of the said two minor children, and of the paternal and maternal grandparents, and make a report to the Judge Presiding at the June Special Term, 1953, of this Court. In the meantime it is ordered that the custody of said children shall remain as at present, with authority of the mother to see the children at any reasonable hour. This the 2&th day of May, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding. No. 5191 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. Shaver Motor Co., Inc. { Thomas & Howard Co., Inc. Et al, { VS. JUDGMENT. City of Statesville, 4 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on motion of Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward, Attorney for the petitioners, it is therefore ordered that the judgment of the Supreme .Court in this matter as fied on April &, 1953, be affirmed, and that the same be enrolled upon the minutes of this court. This the 25th day of May, 1953. Zeb V. Nettles Judge Presiding. ¥ TENET oom eee . Pee ss IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---------- MAY TERM, 1953 ’ Thursday, May 28th, 1953 ee ce —— —————— No. 4197 yorTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. May Term 1953 , Ruth Shives j - Plaintiff, ' CONTINUANCE IN CONTEMPT ORDER f rry Osborne Shives, = Defendant. Vs. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, Zeb V. Nettles, judge Presiding at the May Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court, in the contempt order entered in this cause at the March Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that since the contempt order hereinbefore referred to was entered, the defendant has paid into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court: of Iredell County for the maintenance and support of his minor child, the sum of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). The Court, therefore, on its own motion continues this matter to the June Term 1953 Cabarrus County Superior Court, and the defendant s ordered to appear A. Me, in the Superior Court of Cabarrus on Monday, June 15, 1953, at 10 ofclock, County, the same being within the Fifteenth JudicialPistrict of North Carolina, at — 1 } } ma Concord, North Carolina, to obey and abide such further orders as the Court may make in thiscause. he contempt order hereinbefore This cause and all matters contained in t re continued to the time and place herein~ referred to, and all matters herein, 4 all respects retained for further above set forth for further orders, and is in orders, This the 26th day of May, 1953- Zeb V. NettleSs Judge Presiding e* *« * & & ® NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE Defendant enters a wae of the Court is ong et be continued upon payment of that the Te appear. Af to the ve ordered that the oes + . It is there f 19. prety» waived and that he pay the sum of ¢ : id costs. to apply on sa - No. 1869 State plea of Vs r for judgment Willie Phillips ¢ this action. Guilty as charged in the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 28th, 1953 Thursday, May 28th, 1953 se a nena ot am erence aicaie SASS staan asieiaiuiasunuhaii cet etaennteeteetien ee eee eee ~ ea eee INo. 5381 This 28th day of May, 1953, . Zeb V, Nettles NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR Judge Prestaies IREDELL COUNTY Oe iiisas of Ce A. Ervin, Plaintirr Plaintiff vs Minnie Campbell Minnie Campbell and Isaac ) t sampbell, Defendants cM Isaac Campbell f "@ iefendants This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before his Honor Zeb V, Grant Bolmer Nettles, Judge Presiding, at the May 1953 Term of Iredell County Superior Court Attorney for Plaintiff , McLaughlin & Battley and it appearing to the Court that the arties hereto have agr 1} Dp} ing p greed upon a Settlement Ittorneys for Defendants of all matters and things in controversy between them: It is therefore, by consent, ordered, ad judged and decreed that the plaintirr ‘No. 5410 ; 0. a have and recover of the defendants the sum of 9250.00 together with the cost of this NORTH CAROLINA N THE SUPERIOR COURT action to bet xed by the Cl kK, ; axe y e Clerk IREDELL COUNTY Mhis 28th day of May, 1953. Seb ¥. Bate: rs. Clyde M, Holcomb, Executrix of <2: Nettles 8. F, Holcomb, deceased, Judge Presiding Plaintiff 4 BY consent of . : wae -VS~ JUDGMENT Plaintiff Charles Bailey Reese and Paul Reese se q rs. Clyde M. Holcomb, individually, a : and Clyde Vv, Holcomb, minnie Campbell Defendants ween tt hy and being heard, before His Honor, Zeb V. Isaac Campbel } Defendants THIS CAUSE coming on to heard, : — * Tread l County ’ . ; ; ‘ ne m on a uper r Court of iredeil “8 Grant Bolmer Nettles, Judge Presiding, at the May Term of the Superio Attorney for Plaintif ore eee : a M Clyde M. Holcomb, individually, and Upon the Demurrer of the co-defendants, Mrs. Clyde M. McLauchlin & Battle, ennai aeeneeeeen ae “ Nai} sets and + , . Ay . aoa! . 2 . t Charles Ba iey Hee Attorneys itor Defendants viyde V. Holcomb, for that the Original defendants 9 ifficient to constitute Pan) i te facts sufficie Paul Reese's, Answer and Cross-Action "does not state ! ; A ied So} inion that the sai : a ° n i the opinic + No, 5320 & Cause of action against them", and the Court being o I NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Demurrer should be over-ruled: | Ny ECREED that said Demurrer be IREDELL CcouNTy 7 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED tha ] i Cc $ : M. ~ : : ‘ . f a . ; Lucille M Ervin, Plaintif' d and the Same is hereby over-ruled. m ae . i THIS 28 day of May, 1953. Minnie Campbel) and Isaac ' q Zeb V, Nettles Campbell, Defendants ; Judge Presiding f . To the i . . Holcomb except. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before his Honor Zeb V. | To the entery of the Court, Mrs. Clyde Holcomb & Clyde V oe . a f ] idi i ive notice of appe Nettles, Judge Presiding, at the May 1953 Term of Iredell County Superior Cot, Signing Of the above judgment t hey again except. Both g llents given , ' ment ice waived. Appe and it appearing to the Court that the parties hereto have agreed upon a settle “upreme Court of N.C. in open Court. Further noti countercase or : , . ays to serve of all matters and things in controversy between them: | 0 days to serve case on appeal. Appellors given 30 da! ; intiff zt 18 therefore, by consent, ordered, ad judged and decreed that the plain "Xeption, Appeal Bond set at $100,00. this . Nettles have and recover of the defendants the sum of $250.00 together with the cost of bev te Presiding action to be taxed by the Clerk, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK MAY TERM, 1953 Thursday, May 2tth, 1953 fh ox : a } i s Margaret Jones vs James M Jones Continue —— . : : aiid Minnie Lee Martin vs Tate Linney Continueg C F Moose, Admr of estate of Ralph G Moose, Southern Railway Co & Thomas Ff Pardue, Jr Continued WS Kivett T/A K Dickerson, Inc - John Plain & Co vs D w Scott, T/A Mooresville Bakery J R Cashion T/A Star Milling Co vs Floyd Adams JR Cashion T/A Star Milling Co vs AA Setzer Clarence L Little vs Irene Morrison Little The Board of Education Sam A Brown & Lorene W Brown-Cantinued * vs Schneider M ry Connor et al ker T/A Veteran Cal (He Op NORTH CAROLINA waTyY OF MECKLENBURG SOUTHERN APPLIANCES, INC., a corporation, Plaintirg, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT fILLIAM A. SLOOP t/a Home Appliance and Sectric Company, 0 q 0 0 -Vs~ ; JUDGMEN® 0 Q Q Defendm t, THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the Undersigned Assistant Clerk of the Superior Court of Mecklenourg Coun ty, North Carolina, upon motion by the plain- tiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that Summons was issued in this action on March 8, 1953, and that said summons was served on tae defendant on the 2hth day of March, 1953, and that the plaintirf secured an order extending tne time to file omplaint herein to the 7th day of April, 1953; And it further appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed in this action on the 7th day of April, 1953, and that said verified compliant together wth order for service of complaint was served on the defendant on the 7th day of April, 1953; And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer or other plead- ing has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filedms expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the oreach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Three Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-Six Dollars ang Thirty-Two Cents ($3,676.32) with interest thereon at the rate of six 'S) percent per annum from August 11, 1953 until paid; Now, THEREPORE, IT IS OKDERED, ADJUD3ED AND DECREED that the ee ™d recover of the defendant the sum of Three Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-Six Dollars and Thirty-~Two Cents ($3,676.32) with interest thereon at the rate — (6) percent per annum from August 11, 1952 until paid, and for the costs of &tion, This the 8th day of May, 1953. L. Carl Cook ; TRUE Copy a} Lester Woire tk Superior Court WH. Car? Cook ASSISTANT 2 Se aeeeaceaeee? POO /#5495-4 i STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR Court COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG SOUTHERN APPLIANCES, INC., a corporation, t Plaintiff, , | -Va- , JUDGMENT WILLIAM A. SLOOP t/a Home Appliance and Q Electric Company, Q Defendant, : and ; CARL G. SMITH, Clerk of Superior Court, Q Iredell County, North Carolina, ; ) | Garnishee. Q ie i THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard vefore the undersigned Assistant Clerk of | the Superior Court of Mecklenourg County, North Carolina, upon motion by the plain- i tiff for judgment against the Garnishee; | : | And it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted on the 18th day | of March, 1953, for the oreach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed . by the contract and that judgment by default final was entered herein on the 8th day of May, 1954, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, William A, Sloop t/a Home Appliance and Electric Company, in the sum of Three Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-Six Dollars and Thirty-Two Cents ($3,676.32) with interest thereon at the rate of six (6) percent per annum from August 11, 1952 until paid and for f the costs of this action; } And it further appearing to the Court that Order of Attachment was served up- on the Garnishee herein on March 18, 1953, and that Summons to Garnishee and Notice of Levy was filed herein on March 19, 1953, and served upon the Garnishee herein on March 20, 19543 And it further appearing to the Court that Carl G. Smith, Clerk of Super ior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, Garnishee herein, on the 17th day of April, 1954, filed an answer herein admitting that he has in his possesdion the sum of | One Thousand Fourteen Dollars and Fifty-Six Cents ($1,014.56) belonging to the defendant, William A, Sloop t/a Home Appliance and Electric Company, said amount, however, 2eing subject to court costs of an action pending in Iredell County em : titled GEORGE I. WIKE, Plaintiff, ve. WILLIAM A. SLOOP t/a Home Appliance and Electric Compmy, Defendant. NOW, THEREFORE, IT 15 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff have and recover judgment against the Garnishee herein, Carl G. Smith, in the sum e rt costes st the Ine Thousand Fourteen Dollars and Fifty-Six Cents ($1,01). 56) less cou hereinabove set out, said amount to ve applied on plaintiff's judgment again defendant. This the 8th day of May, 1953, s/ Le Carl Cook sar uperior A TRUE COPY me J. Lester Wolfe Clerk Superior Court By L, Carl Cook ASSISTANT eee een anannann & * a ‘ a va iq 4 /No, 5289 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ' Welch Company } ames O. Wel ar " Plaintif{ VSe } JUDGMENT Yoward Montgomery and L. W. { : 1 5 - Ae f . yekesson, Jre, Trading as M % H Wholesale Company, and City Whole sale Company, 4 corporation, and ] ic Trustee John Price, }% Defendants i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable CO. Ge Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of [Iredell County, North Carolina, and it nith, 01 ona ia aval Linge 4 eontroversy have been appearing to the Court that the itte: ind things in controvers} k nf | Wl rrr } ; nts ard Montgomery an seo 4 settled between the plaintiff and the defendants, Howard Montgomery @ dL. We Lite W laenlile Cam — 4 { 1 Whe sale Compan) and Gity Wholesale ULompal McKesson, Jr., Trading as M *& H Whole e Company, i j ‘ i iff « elected to take a non-suit in its action corporation, and that the plaintill nas e@1 ted to talk i i as to the said John Price, Lee. t the decreed t t ne ct10 It is, therefore, ordered, ad, ( jecreed that b j t { j { -ontinue af ist the said John Price, Trustee, be dism ¢ other named defendants. r h da of | lV, j . —Fierk of nerior UO , O lrede J yount Consented to: Land, Sows rs & Avery 5 W. 1 Ward, dfe Attorneys for Plaintiff io, 5280 . eupeRIOR COURT n TH IPERIOR OO L ww 4 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE IREDELL COUNTY James O.Welch Company, Plaintiff . { J U D G M ki Nv I VS, Hows ' ’ : -: Montgomery and L. W. McKesson, wo. Trading as M & H Wholesale Uom~ ee and City Wholesale Company, @ “orporation, and John Price, Trustee © c E Defendants an Smith, Clerk of ¢ 4, sé ard before the Honorable vs This cause coming on to be hear udgment aintiff for J by the plain the Superior Court of Iredell County, Upon motzen ©’ 4gainst the defendant by default final; #54,95-4 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG SOUTHERN APPLIANCES, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff, -V8- JUDGMENT WILLIAM A. SLOOP t/a Home Appliance and Q Electric Company, Q Defendant, Q | and in CARL G. SMITH, Clork of Superior Court, i Iredell County, North Carolina, Q | Garnishee. | THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard vefore the undersigned Assistant Clerk of ; | the Superior Court of Mecklenourg County, North Carolina, upon motion by the plain- ) tiff for judgment against the Garnishee; ) And it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted on the 18th day Hi of March, 1953, for the oreach of an express contract to pay 4 sum of money fixed | by the contract and that judgment by default final was entered herein on the 8th Hi day of May, 1953, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, William A, iil Sloop t/a Home Appnliance and Electric Company, in the sum of Three Thousand Six | . Hundred Seventy-Six Dollars and Thirty-Two Cents ($3,676.32) with interest thereon } at the rate of six (6) percent per annum from August 11, 1952 until paid and for i the costs of this action; And it further appearing to the Court that Order of Attachment was served up- on the Garnishee herein on March 18, 1953, and that Summons to Garnishee and Notice of Levy was filed herein on March 19, 1953, and served upon the Gar herein on March 20, 19543 And it further appearing to the Court that Carl G. Smith, Clerk of Super ior Electric Compmy, Defendant. defendant. This the 8th day of May, 1954. A TRUE COPY J. Lester Wolfe abe Super ior Court L. Carl Cook ASSISTANT NOW, THEREFORE, IT 1S ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the ee eneuneueenennnne & IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, Garnishee herein, on the 17th day of 1953, filed an answer horein admitting that he has in his possesdion the sum of One Thousand Fourteen Dollars and Pifty-Six Cents ($1,014.56) belonging the defendant, William A. Sloop t/a Home Appliance and Electric Company, said however, 2eing subject to court costs of an action pending in Iredell County 6 titled GEORGE I. WIKE, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM A. SLOOP t/a Home Applian and recover judgment against the Garnishee herein, Carl G. Smith, in th Ine Thousand Fourteen Dollars and Fifty-Six Cents ($1,01).56) less court cost hereinabove set out, said amount to ve applied on plaintiff's Judgment against the s/ Le Carl Cook Meats of Superior Court plaintiff have Apt ee ee ee ae No, 5280 yorTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY j 0, Welch Company wet Plaintiff JUDGMENT VSe Woward Montgomery and L. W. McKesson, df ss Trading as M a H Wholesale Company, and City Whole sale Company, 4 corporation, and John Price, Trustee Defendants This cause coming on to be heard a: i being heard before the Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carol appearing to the Court that the matters anda things in controversy settled between the plaintiff M & H Whole e any, McKesson, Jr., Trading as tiff has elected to take a non-sul corporation, and that the piaintitl as to the said John Price, Trustee. } so acainct . i decreed that tne action against the Awan an narea allu It is, therefore, ordered, ad said John Price, Trustee, ve dismissed other named defendants. This 17th day of May, 1953. Consented to: land, Sowers & Avery , W. I.Wara, Attorneys for Plaintiff aio. 5280 ; « mur GUPERIO! COURT NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR TREDELL COUNTY James O,Welch Company, Plaintiff : VS, : Montgomery and L. We McKesson, pany Trading as M & H Wholesale Com- corps and City Wholesale Company, 4 poration, and John Price, Trustee Defendants <a ee ee ee This cause coming on to be heard before the 0 ‘ py the the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion ©! against the defendant by default final; er ae a ‘ompany, and City Wholesa sut that said aetion conti Honorable C+ G- pl aintiff for Honorable C. Ge ing ‘ . 4 ina, and 1t have been and the defendants, Howard Montgomery and L. W. t in its action nue against tn ct OD le Company, 4 Smith, Clerk of judgment a And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 8th day of May, 1952. And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 16th day of May, 1952 and that an amended complaint was served pursuant to order of court on the 10th day of September, 1952; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has bean filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleading has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified amended complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely the sum of Six Hundred Twenty Six and 47/100 with interest thereon from the 2nd day of October, 1951 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, other than John Price, Trustee, the sum of $626 47/100 with interest thereon from the 2nd day of October, 1951, and the cost of this action. This 18th day of May, 1953. C.G. Smith Clerk of the Superior x oe x NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK and H. W. Si Company MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BY “aa DEFAULT FINAL F. Winston Shumaker tS ffs, Now, comes Z.V. Turlington and William R. Pope, Attorneys for the Plaint and would respectfully show unto the Court: That on the lst day of April, 1953, the Plaintiffs filed their duly verified complaint in the above entitled cause; that in said complaint the Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendant is indebted to them for building materials and supplies sold and delivered to the Defendant during the period between February 8, 1952 and May 30, 1952; that the Plaintiffs and Defendant together audited said account and after deducting all credits, agreed that the balance of said account was in the sum of $505.98, which the Defendant promised and agreed to pay; that the Defendant . ] ly has failed to pay all or any part of said account; that the Defendant was persona’ ® lL» 1953, i t has failed served with summons and a copy of said complaint on the 7th day of Apri that more than 30 days haveelapsed since said service, and the Defendan to file an answer or any other pleading in the cause. es naam WHEREFORE, it is respectfully moved that a judgment by default final be entered against the Defendant in this action for the sum of $505.98 with interest shereon at the rate of six percentum per annum from May 30, 1952 until paid, and for the costs of this action. ZV Turlington and Willian R Pope Attorneys for Plaintiffs NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK a, W. Davis, Jre and H. W. T/A Davis Supply Company VSe JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL f, Winston Shumaker This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the Hon. C. G. Smith, 1 » ena 4 neari + urte: Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court i, i t laintiffs filed j uly verified That on the lst day of Apri- 1953 the Plaintiiis filed their dul} if Nn i at i j mplai laintiffs complaint in the above entitled cause hat in said complaint the P iff ] is i q hem f ‘lding materials and supplies allege that the Defendant is indebted to them ior pbuilding mat » dueine j tween February © sold and delivered to the Defendant during the period between ! = , 1¢ stm anes 441 cether audited said account and May 30, 19523 that the Plaintiffs and Defendant toge ata ai count was in and after deducting all credits, agreed that the balance of said acco : n pay: that the the sum of $505.98, which the Defendant promised and agreed to pays : unt: he Defendant Yefendant has failed to pay all or any part of said account; that the b | ‘eter 7th day of - ‘d complaint on the /th Oa, was personally served with summons and a COP) of said compsss"" ; : ; vice, and the ‘pril 1953, and that more than 30 days have elapsed since said ser ' . 73 , i , i WhiG d reading in the cauSee ant has fail to file an answer or any other pleading @r ‘CREED that the Plaintiffs recover J. no vila — IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGSU AlN with interest “ « ) y tne I ate ol S1X | Pan O24 , O e? . vy e , 3 , 1952 yntil a , action, This the 18 day of May, 1953- No. 5128 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY C. Fe Moose, Administrator of the estate of Ralph G. Moose, deceased Plaintiff VSe Southern Railway Company Defendant <i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff that the plaintiff has elected to submit to a charge of voluntary non-suit in the above action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and taxed with the costs of this action. This 20 day of G. Smith rk of the Superior Court NO e North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Raymond Lambert VSe JUDGMENT Minnie Belle Moore Lambert TO THE HONORABLE CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. is cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a non-suit in this action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This the 25 day of May, 1953. C. Ge. Smith Clerk Superior Court. Consented to: R. A. Hedrick Attorney for the Plaintiff Hugh G Mitchell Attornev for the Defendant How 5439 yorTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY (Before the Clerk) Donald Lackey -VS- Frances Morrison Lackey Now comes the plaintiff, Donald Lackey, by his Attorney, Tressie Pierce Pletcher, and requests that the above entitled action be removed from Iredell County, North Carolina, to Wilkes County, North Carolina, for trial. Tressie Pierce Fletcher Attorney for Plaintiff Now comes the defendant, Frances Morrison Lackey, through her Attorney R. A. Hedrick, and requests permission to witndraw her Answer in the above case, an agrees that said case be transferred from Iredell County, North Carolina, to Wilkes County, North Carolina, for trial, and states that she does not desire + + ; + Pon Am T + es 1 vw Wi e ¥ TV to contest said case, if it is removed trom Iredell County to Wilkes County. R A Hedrick Attorneyfor Vefendant. Saw 4 : } naara hefore m nd it anvearing from the record The above Motion coming on to be nearda before me, and it appearing ir ease be removed from that the defendant, Frances Morrison Lackey agrees that said th hat she aesires wes Carolina for Iredell County, to Wilkes County, Nor is removed + . at : Ps . ol Aar as if it to withdraw her Answer and does not wisn to contest the case 1 1 to Wilkes County for trial, it is, therefore, —— \ ved fro! 11 County ORDERED, that said cause be, and it is hereby removed from Iredell County, North Carolina, to Wilkes County, North Carolina, for triaie Statesville, N. Ga Ce Ge Smith vo 5 i Sourt May 2 95 ‘Terk superior Uourt, ... 2 Ds ] 153 Iredell County, North Caroiina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Monday, June 22nd, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i] IREDELL COUNTY. JUNE TERM, 1953 Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the i County and State aforesaid on the 22nd day of June, 1953, at 10:00 o'clock PY G) "OFFICE OF THE A, M., when and where His Honor, George B. Patton, Judge, is present and : presiding by appointment, as per the following Commission: Ke 2 } ty CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT of the STATE OF NORTH C AROLINA W. A. DEVIN CHIEF JUSTICE \WHEREAS, It has been made to appear to the satisfaction of the undersigned that the public interest requires that you hold the special one week term of the Superior Court for the County of Iredell, beginning the twemt y-second day of June 1953, for the trial of civil cases. NOW, THOREFORE, I, W. A. DEVIN, Chief dustice of the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby find that the public interest so requires and therefore I do hereby commission you to hold said term of said Court for the County aforesaid, to begin on Monday, the twenty-second day of June, 1953, and continue one week, or until the business is disposed of. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name as Chief Jie tice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, on this twenty- sixth day of May, 1953. W. A, Devin Attest: John M. Stron Administrative Assistant" and J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County 4s present and opened Court by order of the Court. n Court the r the J. C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into ope names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors fo June Special Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: SO IRE TIS SERRE TO THE HONORABLE GEORGE B. PATTON i. One of the Special Judges of the Superior Courts of North Carolina. GRESTING: i i on eee “ey a5] 3, C. Beaver Wade D. Blackwelder A, L. McConnell ), Fe Heath J. F. Shinn Mrs. T. Le “oore 3, B. Hedrick E, ©, Bennett J. H. Madison rs. Jo Me Hedrick Glenn Plott R. M. Craven y, V. Lineberger Rk, C, Pierce, Sr. C, F. Marlowe J, A. Deaton J. S. Hicks J. R. Jordan lewis Lucky Amos Smith A. R. Reid cs ¥, A. Woodfin W. +. Colvert A. S. Lentz “a irs, F. H. Deaton J. Sam Overcash R, B. Bunch ¢, H. Ramsey R, J. wilson J. Rex Campbell | i. A. DeBow Miss Eliza Cashion Mrs. L. S. Williams ‘ Mrs, Lizzie Srown Harold S. Millsaps A, Pressly Hobbs | = N, A. Wooifin, J. S. Hicks and Mrs. L. S. Williams were excused by Doctor's | certificates. os Mrs, F. H. Deaton was excused by Clerk. Glenn Plott was not returned. ; / W, T. Colvert was excused by the Court. Miss Eliza Cashion was excused by the Court (crippled). A, S, Lentz and A. Pressly Hobbs were excused by thevourt. J. R. Jordan wes deceased, a The following men and women constitute what shall hereinafter be termed 7 a Ss the divorce jury #1" to-wit: B. C. Beaver, D. F, Heath, -- B, Hedrick, Mrs. 7 M. | ‘al H. A. Dedow, eee. Chief Justice of the Supreme court of q North Carolina % IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WiEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Monday, June 22nd, 1953 i ee ee i 2) H. i nse Hedrick, H. V. Lineberger, J. A. Veaton, Lewis Lucky, C. H. samsey, Mrs. Lizzie Brown, Wade 0. Blackwelder and J. F. Shinn. j as n and women constitute what shall le reinafter be terme Pierce, The following me Sr., Amos Smith, the divorce jury #2" to-wit: 5. C- Bennett, Ke v- ‘i ell, Mrs. T. L- B ’. Sam Overcash, R. J. Wilson, Harold S. Millsaps, A. L. McConnei, £4 oN , R. Reid. 3 Hoore, J. H. Madison, R. M. Craven, cS, #,. Marlowe and A 8 No, 5520 DIVORCE e Jury #1" being duly sworn and The Divore bmitted to it as empanelled answer | s the issues su } follows: | | i Ear] Beaver, Jr. vs Patty Sue Beaver NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY In the Superior Court June Special Civil Term 1953 far] Beaver, Jr i ES vs. j 1s3U P atty Sue Beaver | the complaint? q as alleged in 1, Were the plaintiff and defendant marrie Answer _yes 2. Did the defendant commit adultry 4° Answer __yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Monday, June 22nd, 1953 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceeding the filing of the complaint in this action? Answer _yes NORTH C AROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY June Special Civil Term 1953 Earl Beaver, Jr. vs. 1 JUDGMENT Patty Sue Beaver | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of Iredell County Superior Court before His Honor, Judge George B. Patton, and a jury, and the jury having answered the Issues as set out in the record. It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be ani the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. George B, Patton Judge Presiding xe KKK RK OK OK No. 5536 DIVORCE j } The Divorce Jury #2" being duly sworn and Mary Anne Helms {| empanelled answers the issues submitted to it vs. | As follows: Ronald B. Helms j North Carolina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Iredell County Mary Anne Helms vs. | Issues Ronald B, Helms | 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Varolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 2. Were the plaintiff anidefendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Mary Anne Helms vs Judgment Ronald 3, Helms IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Monday, June 22nd, 1953 ee CC —_——eeecea —— This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable George B. Patton, Judge Pre- iding over the June Civil Term, 1953 Iredell Superior Court, and being’ heard before said Honorable George B. Patton, and a Jury, the dllowing issues were submitted to the Jurys 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? The Jury havine answered all of said issues "Yes", herefore, by the Vourt ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonis It is, tner ’ ee .? os ; of matrimony heretofore existine between the plaintiff and the defendant be forever dissolved, and the plaintiff is sereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Ronald B. Helms, and that the cost of tis action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk. This 22nd day of June, 1953. George B. Patton Judge Presiding WH. 5236 : siiiia: iil H oAROLTi N THS SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SU I I Jury sworn and empanelied as 1o11ows: . Bo R, Cc. Pierce, Sr., Amos Smith, J. Sam Overeash, &. J. Wilson, Harold S, Histone, ; re cee . a L McConnell, Mrs T L hoore, J. H. adison, Plaintiff R. l.. Craven, c. «. harlowe and A. R. Reid ISSUE IREDELL COUNTY Minnie Lee martin, Tate Linney { Defendant | a toler COV ares fror What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover as dana defendant? Anewer? $143.48. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Minnie Lee Mertin, Plaintiff iV ENT vs. Ef eRe rr Tate Linney, | Defendant ! re His Honor, This cause coming on to be hear d and being neard befo at the June, 1953, Special term of the “eorge B. Patton, Judge presiding, and @ Jury itted swered the jesue subm n Superior Court of Iredell County, and the dary havens * to them ag f 11 ; ollows: amages from the What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover as damag defendant? Answer: 3143.18 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --<=- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 va" Tuesday, June 23rd, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERN, 1953 Monday, June 22nd, 1953 : : norable Court convenes acc _ Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff ea Pe GREENE CO BAJORTAMAMS On Tusnday Nordtag, have and recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred Forty Three and 43/100 ar — sicusiacecasinaatia with interest thereon from this date, together with tk 2 ; fb | , ’ g 1e cost of this action, | Bes WW This 22 day of June, 1953. e; a a4 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1a George B. Patton 4 — — George B. Patton, Judge Presiding m4 [REDE LL COUNTY JUNE TERM, 1953 wm oe OK NK OS OK xc ue ze Se “4 A, G, Frazier, | : ie Plaintiff, ‘No. 5274 Daniel Lazenby vs Koxie Snives Lazenby ---------- ; re if JS iaiceeeeenesiee vontinued = (J -Vs- ISSUES a No. 5314 W Ww Goodrum vs Vera Loretta Goodrum -------------- : Wy | eee ee eee Continued 4 J, C. Morrow if Jio. 5424 Hubert W Bleckw is Law | 3 | nee | | 4 Huber lackwood vs Lois Laws Blackwood ---------------- Conttenst a Mo, S497 Batheriae D Slonp vo Willdam B Sleep <omeecnececsecennens ia “9 1. Was the automobile of the Plaintiff damaged by the negligence of the | JNo. 5502 Winifred Oscar Wright vs Maxine Gladys Wrirht ------------ nah toee i Defendant as alleged in the Complaint? f iq) iNo. 5513 D My ‘ 3 . , ANSWER Yes | | 5513 orothy Moore Leonard vs John Leonard ------------------<= Continued bg ‘No. 5522 Fannie Wilson Wooden vs James Henry Wooden --------------- iad r 2, Did the Plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to the damage to his Vo. 5535 Evangeline P Mayhew vs Taylor Mayhew --------------------- Seieiinnn aytomobile as alleged in the Answer? No. 5465 aig Lou Holleman B!.F Rachel Dickens vs P D dames & ANSWER __Yes___. m eames ee ; - , » o Vontinued for Jefendant 3, What amount, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled torecover of the Defendant? AV - 9 F G Sc am vj 4 : NO 54,90 J f Goforth vs James M White -<—<—““—<—<“ ae ee ee ee Conti nued by Consent ANSWER Alo. 5322 l. Was the automobile of the Vefendant damaged by the negligence of the x Plaintiff as alleged in the Answer? A, G,. Frazier | Jury Sworn and empanelled as follows: P | B.C. Beaver, D. F. Heath, C. B. Hedrick, ANSWER ve | Mrs. J. M. Hedrick, H. V. Lineberger, © 4. i. J. Ge} } Ramsey, Mrs Lizzie Brown, J. F. Shinn R, B, Bunciys 5. What amount, if any, is the Defendant entitled to mcover of the Plaintiff? . o. Morrow | J. Rex Campbell, J. Sam Overcash and Harold S. {| Millsaps. Answer NORTH CAROLIN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL SOUNTT.’ SPECIAL JUNE TERM 1953. A. G, Frazier, | Plaintiff, | Vs. JuDGMENT J.C, Morrow, Defendant. i e | r This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Hono he Special June Term 1953 of George B, Patton, Judge Presiding, and a Jury at t Carolina; and the Jury having the Superior Court of Iredell County, North answered the Issues submitted to them as follows: nce of t he ) 1. Was the automobile of the Piaintif? desased 7 the neglige Defendant as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWEK _Yes 4 the damage to hs | 2. Did the Plaintiff, by his own negligenc’s contribute to ' t a automobi d in the Answer: This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, June 23rd, 19535 oe oer ANSWE ee | er of the Defendant? at 9:00 o! . M 9 o'clock A. !} sila ld 3. What amount , if any, is the Plaintif Judge Presiding ANSWER : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Tuesday, June 23rd, 1953 Was the automobile ofthe Defendant damaged by the nesligence of the Plaintiff as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER . What amount, if any, is the Defendant entitled to recover of the Plaintiff? ANSWER ° NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff take nothing by this action, and that the Defendant go without day and recover of tk Plaintiff the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk; and that the Defendant will take nothing by reason of his counterclaim and as to which the Plaintiff will go without day. Signed and entered in the Superior Court of Iredell County, Statesville, North Carolina, on June 23, 1953. 2 sone 8; Parton Judge Presiding APPEAL ENTRIES To the siening of the Judgment as ap ears in record, the Plaintiff excepts and 2ppeals to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for errors assicned and to be assigned. Notice of appeal siven in open court; furtner notice waived. Appeal d in the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) adjudged to be sufficient. The Plaintiff is allowed sixty (60) days to serve case on appeal, and the Defendant is allowed thirty (0 days thereafter to serve countercase or file exception. Siened and entered in the SuperiorCourt of Iredell County, North Jarclina, on 3, 1953. George 5. Patton GEORGE B. PATTON Judge Presiding No. Sp 3683 NORTH CAROLIN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JUNE TERM, 1953 William G. Odom and wife, Mary Lee Odom -V- Charles B. Young and wife, Jane Young. ' It is stipulated between Plaintiffs and Defendants, that a jury trial 18 waived and this matterAs submitted to the Court upon an agreed statement of facts ; r and the additional evidence offered by the parties, and that the Court may rende such judgment as the law and facts justify, without the intervention of 4 jury IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Tuesday, June 23 , 1953 a Cy es It is further stipulated and agreed that the Trial Judge may enter the joment in or out of term and in or out of the County or Judicial District, jude 4 that such judgment shall fs ve the same force and effect as if it were an : F rendered during the term. Ao, 5336 John Plain & Co vs D W Seott T/A Mooresville Bakery ------ Continued 0. Slarence L Little vs Irene Morrison Little Cont inued ho. 5378 s until Wednesday Morning, This Honorable Court takes a reces 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. \S.- udge Pres ng IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Wednesday, June 24th, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, June 24th, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. /No. 5474 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Special Term June 1953 Geneva Coleman Gragg, Plaintiff, Lewis Graze, | | Vs. | 1 I Defendant. 1. Did the plaintiff, Geneva Coleman Gragg, md the defendant, Lewis Gragg, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER _ Yes . 2. Have the plaintiff, Geneva Coleman Gragg, nd the defendant, Lewis Gragg, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years immediately prior to the commmcement of this »action? ANS..ER Yes ° 3. Has the plaintiff, Geneva Coleman Grar-, been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court TREDELL COUNTY. Special Term June 1953 Geneva Coleman Gragg, Pleintiff, Vs. AFFIDAVIT Lewis Gragg, { Defendant. | Geneva Colenan Gragg, after being duly sworn, deposes and says: ole That she is the plaintiff in the above entitled action. @2@ That she is a resident and citizen of Iredell County, North Carolinas ~3- That the defendant, Lewis Gragg, is a resident and citizen of Caldwell County, State of North Carolina. a ution of That the defendant, Lewis Grar~, was not at the time of the instit n of this action, nor is he now, nor has he been at any time since the institutio this action, in the military service of the United States of America. IN THE SUPERIOR CubuatT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Wednesday, June 24th, 1953 Geneva Coleman Gra Geneva coleman Grage ypgoribed and sworn to before me, Juve hig the 24th day of Jure, 1953. tarlie Fa Murdock se bablic fy commission expires: 9-2-53. (YOTARIAL SEAL ) WRTH CAROLINA, In the Supe rior Court REDELL COUNTY. Special Term June 1953 Seneva Coleman Gragg, Plaintiff, Vs. lewis Gragg, i Defendant. | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor George B. i j m June 19 Superior Court Patton, Judge Presidinre, and a jury, at the Special Term June 1953, having been submitted for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues g to, and answered by the jury, to-wit: is Gragg 1. Did the pleintiff, Geneva Coleman Grage, and the defendant, ee P intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER _ Yes ° 2. Have the plaintiff, Geneva Coleman Gragg, other for two consecut md the defendant, Lewis ive years imme diately wragg, lived separate and apart from each r + , ‘ a £ 9 prior to the commencement of this action: ANSWER Yes : | been a bona fide resident 0! the 3. Has the plaintiff, Geneva Coleman Gragé, preceding the commencement of this State of North Carolina for six months immediately action? ANSWER Yes Z wo feeshae | was duly served on the defendant by the s The Cc i that summon he Court further finds 1953, bY delivering 17 Sheriff of Caldwell County, North Carolina, on Feprwary ©" ylaint. sopy of the comp Personally to the ijefendant a copy of the summons and a COP} | ADJUDGED AND DECRE defendant be, am ney ED, That the bonds IT 13, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, nlaintiff and the of matrim tween the mony heretofore existing be greated “i beolute ‘oleman Gragé eis lissolved, and that the plaintiff, Geneva Coleman ' ‘i ° “Woree from the defendant, Lewis Graze» Plaintire, Thie t he 24th day of duné, 1953 George B. Patton Seorge Se Feriing gone ee tenes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Wednesday, June 24th, 1953 /No. 5521 North Carolina | In the Superior Court. Iredell County | Neil S. Sowers, Plaintiff, vs Home-Made Chair Company, Inc. and L. 0. Gibson, M. W. Gibson and M. B. Brosius, individually, and as stockholders, officers and directors of the Home- Made Chair Company, Inc. Defendants. This matter coming on to be heard before His Honor, George B. Patton, Judge Presiding over the June, 1953, Special Civil Term of the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Car lina, the Plaintiff being represented by his Counsel of record and the defendants being represented by their counsel of record, and being heard upon the Motion of the plaintiff to strike allegations from the Answer, as the same appears of record, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and the citation of authorities: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed: 1. That the Motion of the plaintiff to strike Paragraph Two of the Second Further Answer and Defense of the defendants be, and the same hereby is allowed. 2. That the Motion of the plaintiff to strike other allegations from the Answer be, and it hereby is denied. This the 24th day of June, 1953. George B. Patton Judge Presiding To the foregoing Order the plaintiff, in apt time and in open Court objects and excepts and rives notice of apneal to the Supreme Court of No in open Court. Further notice waived, By consent, the plaintiff is allowed 60 days in which to make un and serve case on appeal to the Supreme Court and we defendants are allowed 30 days thereafter in which to serve counter-case OF exceptions. Apeal Bond in the sum of $200.00 is adjudged sufficient. Uhis the 24th day of June, 1953. George B,. Patton Judge Presiding rth Carolina aN trie SUPonT Un COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Wednesday, June 24th, 1953 /No. 5433 North Carolina In the Superior Court Tredell County E. F. Belk, Electrical Contractor Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Mrs. J. M. Hedrick, H. V Li ~M, s Be neberger, C. H, 7, Mrs Lizzie Brown, J. F. Shinn iti a oe Overcash, Harold : s mos Smith, R. J. Wi Blackwelder and B, C? Reaver em vs Schneider Mills, Inc. Issues 1. What amount if ay is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: $551.20. North Carolina In the Suverior Court Iredell County E, F. Belk, Electrical Contractor | vs. JUDGMENT | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by his Honor George B, Schneider Mills, Inc. Patton, and a Jury, at tne Special Term June 1953, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issue having been submitted to and answered by the Jury, as follows: 1. What amount if any is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: $551.20 The Court further finds that summons was duly served on the defendant by the Sheriff of Alexander County, North Carolina, on December, 1952, by delivering Personally to the defendant a copy of the summons and a copy of the€omplaint. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $551.20 together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 24th day of June, 1953. George B, Patton Judge Presiding eesesee eee” Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: E, C, Bennett z Pierce, SIs, A. L. McConnell, Mrs T. L, Moore, J. Mo. 54.25 | j Madison, R. M. Craven, C. . Marlowe, A. R, Reid, H. A, ! Jeorge Carlton Sanders ) vs Owd Underwood DeBow, . F. Heath, C. B. Hedrick and Lewis Lucky. Pending trial of this case, the Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning. This Honorable Court takes 8 recess until Thursday Morning, June 25th, 1953, 8t 9:30 o'clock A. Me Sd 5 O Ww IR WR UN J % IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Thursday, June 25th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WELK e-- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Thursday, June 25th, 1953 sepeeeememmanemneret —_—_— ate ita ae arrrneeneerer ~~, -iciaisetaatatA LACE LL LLL LL DLE LL ra _ _— ii ——_—$ 4 This Honorable Vourt convenes accordiny to adjournment on Thursday Morning This cause is retained for further orders. ’ June 25th, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. This June 25th, 1953. : George B. Patton % UDGE PRESTOING i AN O- 5492 i i a ae ae : Rem 3 % H NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | JUNE 3 — IREDELL COUNTY E SPECIAL TERM, 19 a . , t anit | » 41953 SW jog canoLina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ; ~ nA m Qo aoa Wai" Wi IN THE MATTER OF: : 2 ae =u 16 a ; The Custody and Control of { ORDER ie IREDELL COUNTY JUNE TERM, 1953 antl } James Ray Hayes and i" irr Be | fe Ma Ann Hayes, Infants "H@ Gerge variton 2 i — yee, a Plaintiff i (Ages 7 and 3, respectively) { a ii , i" vs ISSUES . ik The above entitled matter coming on to be heard before the undersigne ry Rt gned at the 7B Dowd Underwood a June, 1953 Special Term of Iredell Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court, i eeceemaue a : t} Cor j ine the f wing fa : | q . ; : sia , oe i ee Se SONS TINE Se Serene Ferre 1. Was the automobile of the Plaintiff damazed by the negligence of the 4 a. 1. That Petitioner, Connie May Hayes and Resrondent, d. WwW. He ere m = : , a | : y y Vv . ve ayes were married on Jefendant as alleged in the Somplaint? on “g i November 13, 1943; a | . ; =e | ANSWER: _ Yes 1 ' The e marri » \ ahttaA am ap , fo Sonn Ol ‘ ‘ sy. h % i 2. That to the marriare two children, James Ray Hayes and Margaret Ann 45 ayes were 2, Did the Plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to tne damage to / i I born. ° H | his automobile as alleged in the Answer: i 3, That on Febrmiary 9, 1953 Petitioner ani Respondent entered into a separation ANSWER: Yes Br arreement by the terms which Respondent w have the 5 eare. cu Ay : : S+led of the Defendant? a. eemen y e terms of which Respondent was to have the sole care, custody 3. What amount, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover a and control of the minor children, James Ray Ha es end Margaret Ann Heyes, and ANSWER: a tha hould esp nt be ahle to maintai the ct shou ; , epligence of the Plaintiff hat should Respondent be unshl maintain a home for the children and it ould lb. Was the automobile of the Defendant damaged by the n ‘ hecome necessary to place the children in some other hom it should be one F : ; ae Get oe SF : as alleged in the Answer? satisfactory to both vart’ es. iSWE = ANS “ ER ; ee a . ” m : ‘ pal oo cura Plaintiff? That the Petitioner and Keevondent are now and wre at the time of the i jling oj tled to recover of the 1 } +s ; ‘i etn eel ti 5. What amount, if any, is tne Defendant en le the Application for writ of sabeas vorpus livine in a state of separation. ANSWER: Abe ' . That Respondent has established a home for said children with his sister, Sdna —— WI Hayes living in the home and carine for the children. NORTH CAROLINA ‘ a ; ; ; . SPEC AL JUNE ii q 1953. . That the home now being provided by Respondent is a fit and suitable hom IREDELL COUNTY es for the minor children so lone as Respondent's sister, cdna Hayes, lives in the Jeorge Carlton Sanders | aA nant : . ; Plairtiff home and assists in the care or said minor children. | | JUDGMENT ; Vs. their remaining 7. That the welfare of said minor children would be best served by ; Jowd Underwood in tye custody of xKesnvondent, . ain y tespondent, uv. «. Hayes. Defendant i i 6 e is Honor veoreg + ~~ | aT’ fore H Janee 70 heard, and bein neard, be This cause coming on to be , € Term 1953 of vne It is, upon the above findings, ordered that the minor children, a dury 2t tne Special June lina; and %ne Hayes and i.arparet Ann Hayes remain in the custody and control of their father, 3. Patton, Judge Preeiding, 2nd red er ewes ree answe J. W. Hayes until the further Order of the Court. superior Coy , North Caro ourt of Iredell County, Jury having It is further ordered that the Petitioner, Hdna Hayes, be allowed to have the Seance wales sed < y the negligence 0+ ** £3 tslock : 2 said children every other week, from five o'clock P. M. on Friday until five ° l. Was the automobile of the Plaintiff danagee : D the Comp ; P, M. on Saturday, until the further order o: this Court,- the first of said efendant as alleged in ~lock NSWE ; periods to be from five o'clock P. iM. on Friday, June 26th, 1953 until five ot cloc WER ____Ath.. P, M. on Saturday, June 27th, 1953. d to The Petitioner is to call for said : hildren at the Respondent's home an return them to Respondent’ home at the expiration of the t ime above set oute IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Thursday, June 25th, 1953 Did the Plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to the damage ¢ his automobile as alleged in the Answer? ge to ANSWER: Yes ° What amount, if any, is the Plainti ff entitled torecover of the defendant? ANSWER: len eee Was the automobile of the Defendant damaged by the negligence of the Plaintiff as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER : ° 5. What amount, if any, is the Defendant entitled to recover of the Plaintiff? ANSWER: ° NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff take nothing by this action, and that the Defendant co without day and recover of th Plaintiff the costs of this action to be taxed by the vlerk; and that the Defendant will take nothing by reason of his counterclaim and as to which the Plain- tiff will go without day. Siened and entered in the Superior Court of Iredell vounty, Statesvi-le, North Carolina, on June 25, 1953. George B. Patton GeOnGe B. PATON, Judge Presiding a ae ae ae s ae "No. 5434 George O Cornelius « G Jury sworn ana empanelled as rollows: Sarah hi Cornelius , he C. Bennett, R. v. Pierce, Sr., A. lL. j.cConnell, H. V. Lineberger, C. H. Ramsey, J. F. Shinn, vs &. B. Bunch, J. Rex Campbell, J. Sam Overcas'l, Harold S. Millsaps, R. J. Wilson and B. ©. Beaver. Gaither Bldg Co Inc Pending trial of this case the Court takes a recess until Friday Morning. 4 Thie Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, June 26th, 195%, at 9:30 o'clock A, KM, ee a a Iw tan olUPenlUa CUUnT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Friday, June 26th, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournmmt on Friday orning, arate, 1953, 8b 9590 ofctock &. B Noe 5422 wrt CAROLINA REDELL COUNTY . Ge Miller, 1 Plaintiff, | t ORDER -vs- 4, Banks Culp, { Defendant. 1 j and bei h 7 he undersi«ned This cause coming on to be heard and being heard hefore t : , es aaa i eae ‘ Judge Presiding at the dune, 1953 Special Term of the superior Court for Iredell i ant t j ions of > Reply of the lountty upon motion of the defendant %o strike portions of the Reply : sine of the opini that such motion in all respects plaintiff, and the vourt being of the opinion that suc ti should be allowed: the defendant to strike ¥+28 Bx AAS g.se. > x ~ oases Y a < im 5 mis ‘ “e ne h n t NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS GhJhaen that the motion ot bered 1 through 10, and the motion of tne <a those Paragraphs of the Reply num : . pavaerann 3 of the Reply to the FIRST FUATHEM A defendant to strike portions ol aragrapn 4 0 th pl a tter be and the same a ee ; er red and sucn matter ve IMD DEFENSE be and the same hereby are allowed, 4 hereby is stricken from the ieply- j SECOND FURTHER » nl um em Te PIR! ERED 6) apraphs 2 and 3 of the BY >ONS ANd I i iv fF UntTiba UN Rov that Paragr p | : a icken from COUNTER-CLAIM be and the same hereby ere stricke ANSWER AID DEraNSt the Answer of the Vefendant. } hie ewe ‘24 a to nis ANEWS 7 defendant 1] ave 30 days to file an mendment ine defendant s nal have 3U aay .- oi t ‘laim is based, , haan ¢ h Counter-vialim if settine forth the facts and circumstances on which suc ea 2 : m t "1% ° enw the filine of a Reply ° req hy aw oY l Ld and the plaintiff shall have tne time allowed by 1aW je ; to do SO« such Counter-claim in the event tnat he desires This the 26th day of June, 1953+ George 3. Patton GEORGE Be PAL-UN, Judge Presiding. re consent: h. . to be by consent, We © 80 much of the foregoing Orde! ; ADANT ROLMER ea mscme GRAIN SMATHERS & CARPENTER oz Grant Bolmer iii Ketorney for the Plaintili. 4 _ William B, Webb ttorneys for the Derendante | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WESK --= JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Friday, June 26th, 1953 Friday, June 26th, 1953.” fo. 5466 : ho. 546 D0. 5434 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERTOR COURT, TF gr CAROLINA IN THEQPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. JUNE SPECIAL TEM, 1953. AA spgoet county — , . George O- Cornelius and wife, Vse i ORDER a garah M. Cornelius, Plaintiffs denry Grady Sloan { , i -vs- JUDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this June Special Term ; o : - a 4 Building Company, Inc. of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, George R a a" befendeat : Patton, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that C, G. Smith, Clerk of tS a “ . . This cause coming on to be heard at the June Special Term 1953 Iredell the Suerior Cort of Iredell vounty, was appointed Receiver for the funds on ' : . all Superior Court before his Honor, George 5. Patton, and a jury, and the issues a leposit or in possession of the Cabarrus %ank and Trust vomnany belongins to the fact raised by the pleadings having been answered in favor of the Defendant as iefendant: : : , they appear in the record; It is therefore ordered and adjudged by tre Court that said Bank, -abarrus y PP , om 0 , ; IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiffs recover 3ank and Trust Company of fannapolis, North Jarolina, immediately on rece int of “ied f nothing of the defendant; thet the action be dismissed, and that they be taxed 1 cert fied cony of this order pay over to said Receiver, °. G. Smith, any and : o . : ; i. 2 - , vith the costs. all funds on deposit or in possession of said Bank and Trust Vompany, belonging to This 26th day of June, 1953. the above named defendant. George B. Patton This June 26th, 1953. JOG! PRESTOING George B. Patton APPEAL ENTRIES Judge Presiding To the signing of the foregoing judgment, plaintiffs in apt time and in x , J C ae her open court excepts and apreals to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. furt — o file notice is waived. Appeal bond set at 5300 00. Plaintiffs allowed 60 days © INO. 5434 . ; fe tionSe [ORTH SARC case on appeal; defendant 30 days thereafter to file countercase or excep NORTH CAROLINA HE SUPERIOR COURT G e B. Patton ai rote PRESTUING IREDELL JOUNTY Geape 0. Cornelius and wife, Sarah M. | sornelius, “NO. Sp 361,2 iORT! THE SUPERIOR COURT { NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR IREDELL COUNTY JUNE 1953 TE. Plaintiffs, Gaither Puildins Jompany, Incorporated, Defendant ; ; | " Mrs. Lessie C. Knight and husband, V- T. ; Knight, Mrs. Lucy C. Doby and husband, 1. Did the defendant breach its contract with the plaintiffs as alleged by 4 Alexander Doby, Mrs. Tobitha Cc. Trivette and husband, Gurney Trivette, Mrs. Ida ¥. Grose 1 the plaintiffs in their amended complaint? and hushand, Leslie Grose, Zebra James ~00 7 and wife, Raby Camobell, Corndius Campbell and ANSWER: No ‘ wife, Helene Vamnbell : 1 ? 2. What amount are the plaintiffs entitled to recover from the defendant: -vs- ANSWER: reek son Campbell and wife, Magcie vam bell, ae j2idon Campbell and wife, Eloise Campbell, Yohnny Campbell end wife, Dorothy Campbell, urtis Cemobejl, unmarried, weldon Campbell and wife, Erie Camobell, md James Campbell ad wife, Hazel Campbell. dell rd at the Special June, 1953 Term of Ire This cause coming on to be hea Judge Presiding, and Superior Court before his Honor George B, Patton, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Friday, June 26th, 1953 It appearing to the Court thet this is a special proceeding for the division of lands belonging to the petitioners and the defendants, and that upon the filir of the Report of the lJommissioners and the conrirmation thereof by the Clerk of Suverior Court, two of the tenants in common filed exceptions and appealed fron the order of the Court confirming the allotment. It now appears tot nis vourt that the parties do now desire to withdraw their exceptions filed in this cause and agree to permit the vourt to confirm the division heretofore made by the Commissioners appointed by the vlerk to the end that the allotmets, values, and assessments made by the Comsissioners may be charged or credited .o the respective shares. The Court finds as a fact that the division made by the Commissioners, the shares allotted to the parties, andthe values placed thereon, are fair and reasonable, and that the Report of the Commissioners should be confirmed. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the allotment made by the Commissioners in this cause, dated January 31, 1953, be and the same is hereby, and in all respects, ratified and confirmed, and to that end the separate allot- ments made to the individual tenants in common and the joint allotment made of Tract No. 8 are respectively set over to the separate owners thereof, and Tract No. 1 allotted to Lealdon Campbell is charged with a cash contribution of $1,900.00 for use and benefit of the other tracts as set out herein. Tract No. 2 set over to Johnny Campbell is credited with $317.00 to be paid by assessment against the more valuable tracts. Tract No. 3 allotted to Cornelius Campbell is credited with %638.00 to be paid by the more valuable tracts. Tract No. 4 allotted to James Campbell is credited with $448.00 to be paid by the more valuable tracts. Tract No. 5 allotted to Jackson Cambell is credited with $926.00 to be paid by the more valuable tracts. tract No. 6 allotted to Curtis Campbell is credited with 3613.00 to be paid by the more valvable tracts. Tract No. 7 allotted to Weldon Campbell is to be paid the sum of $458.00 by the more valuable tracts. Tract No. 8 is allotted to Lessie Campbell Knight, Lucy Campbell Doby, Tobitha Campbell Trivette, Ida Campbell Grose, md Zebra J. Campbell, and is charged with the payment of $1,500.00 into the Court for the benefit of the less valuable tracts. Each of the tenants in common are assessed one-twelfth of the cost 0 to be taxed by the Clerk, fl a ied The Report of Commissioners, together with a copy of this Judpment, 18 certif 8 to the Register of Deeds of Iredell County to the end that the division made in thi Proceeding will be recorded in that office. George B. Patton Judge Presi ding YR KEK KH KR Re OOK K f this action SSL ARO NRE RR secre ee eer IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 Friday, June 26th, 1953 518 Alice Inez Bost Smith vs Roy L Smith Continued Now 5 fo. SP 3617 Mary Sharpe Morrign et al vs “annie Sharpe Hinshaw et al - Continued » Wo. 5473 Margaret Jones vs James ). Jones Continued SP Ino. /3683 NORTH C AROLINA IN TH& SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JUNE, 1953, SPECIAL TERM William G. Odom and wie, Mary Lee Odom -VS- Charles B. Young and wife, Jane Young { This cause coming on to be heard before the undersiged Judge holding the . : fad a - : . - ao , i 3 ties June, 1953, Special Term of the Superior Court of Iredell vounty, and tne par having waived a jury trial and arreed for the Sourt to determine the entire ® uly filed with the Cour he controversy on the agreed statement of facts duly filed with the vourt by t parties and their Counsel. : : h acreed temen ft And the Court, after giving due cmsideration to the agreed statement o Vas ~ Ve > 3 : : - rad h 4 ; n and , a : e ; by the parties, being of tne opinio facts and the additional evidence o!icred by tne r ) oe eee — w. K. Neill and wife findine that the deeds from J. W. Brawley, Trustee, tO M+ be _ , ; : Hiandnnee » eonvey the lands Maybelle Neill, md W. K. Neill anda wife to Plaintiffs, only convey .Y } the . «a bad esnd MO) fe s contemed by th jescribed therein for a depth of five huncred (500) feet, as C9 : at eover in this action: : “3 tae 4 are n& entitled to recover 4 defendants, and that the plaintiffs ere nd env 3 . se ae . _ y + hi cr yy tC nel adjudged tha ne plaintiffs take notin by ud § Und vel IT IS, THEREFORE ordered aru said action and tnat same be It is further ordered that hy the slerk. ‘arolina, by consent of all Dme at office in Franklin, Norts vounsel, this July 10, 1953. George 3, Patton, vive agi ho, 5525 NORTH CAROLINA ot Git Gaia coi Oe sigcuzms REDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Harold Lee Jordan, ! PM, f. Wolke vompany, j i Plainiff Plaintiff I “4 | _ VS. JUDGMENT oii j JUDGMENT | 3 ,D, (Mack) Fox, trading es Mack Hattie Speer Wilson, 1 fox Paint Co-, | a Defendant bs Defendant { Ga | : This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Carl G i: : a This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable v. G. Smith, vlerk of the Smith, Clerk of Superior Court, Iredell vounty, North Carolina, and it appearing es ’ . : TH Suerior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against to the Sourt thet the parties tothis action have settled e1l matter and : + isti 1 ' PM the defendant by default final; . comtroversy existing between them for the sum of One Hundred Yollars (3100.00) f : r4 F fi And it appearing to the Court that a verified co plaint was filed and summons It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff m ve and ie ae . g esd PM issued in this action on the 29th day ol April, 1933. recover of the defendant the sum of One HundredDollars ($100.00) and the cost f the , ; t And it further appearing to the vourt that no answer, demurrer, or otner ue of this action to be paid by the defendant. % i 4 dings ha ‘ pleading has been filed by tne defendant and an extension of time to file pleadings as Nf This the 23 day of June, 1953. ‘ aor -t20 «Saas av be Ht been granted until June 20, 1953 and that the time within which pleadings may : / Ht C., G. Smith ie Clerk of Superior Vourt filed has expired; i) . ified complaint that the Hh By consent: And it further apvearing to the vourt from the verified complaint that 7. . wet ‘ ; ° , ay 1H] : aed n een anntract to pay a sum Ol money Hh R. A. Kedrick _ rause of action emsists of the breach 0} an express contrac , oe oy HT Attorneys for “laintiff 4 Thirty Nine and 71/100 oy / ; ps P Bad Jyy id nir yr WIN Gas i+/ | Lend. Se : 1 fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Four hunare J f anc wers, Avery ward . rher. 1952: , el Dicecat tattle nes tein iaen . * } y of epterm”e! 43) a | Attorneys for Jefendant (3439/71) Dollars with interest thereon from the 20th day 2ep , ’ Ie .. . : ;ff have a é nN : : bik d decreed that tne plaintiff lav i Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjuiged, and cecr wr Hundred thirty Nine and 71/100 and recover of the defendant the sum 0% fou from the 3 ber 52, ana tne 20th day of Septemver, 1952, an ($439.71) Dollars, with interest thercon Costs of this action. this 27 day of June, 1953. G, Smith ng nn jerk of the ouperior vourt Vie . L i / No. 5385 merchandise shown in the plaintiff! NORTH CAROLINA, S statem ibi tement marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Fr Hund ed S V l ( (~ \+ ) to A e e t COUNT Before the Clerk thereon at the : IREDELL COUNTY. > rate of six per cent ver annum f ' rom i.arch ] 50 a ' C 5 IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERE % 4920, wandd madd, atson Casket Company, 0 SESS TERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that tt laintiff & AN J nS 1e p ain recover of the defendant, C, 3, Reavis Plaintiff, ee 7 | S, tradin- and doinrs business as Reavis FINAL JUDGME IT “uneral Home, the sum of Four Hundred ra Seventy Dollars ani no Cents 3470.00), C. B. Reavis, Trading and together with interest thereon at the loing business as Reavis 9 nee wad, : s *uneral Home, — paca, together with rate of six per cent per annum from March 14, costs of this action taxed by the Court. Defendant. This the 13th day of July, 1953 a This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the under- ce G. Smith lerk of Suverior © i . . ~~ - hc : , r Vourt of siened Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this Iredell County. 13th day of July, 1953, on motion of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: | )#5568-A —_ NORTH CAROLINA, That on October 13, 1952, plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint DAVIDSON COUNTY. in the above entitled action, with clerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell Ve Ge PISTOR, County. ” -2- REBECCA MAY3E:(RY FOSTER ° t t hie surt on U “ft of er i 3 , 1 d& ’ to tne This cau sec om i Nn 44 i A da ) TY ' 1 ] at summons was issued trom nis ™ , . , & 4 ‘ is I , il iam i. Hatch, Jud:e Presiding, and ee e ame 1 12 na provided by law Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provii oy , ares To Sapeee nn ed in favor of the plaintiff: Tiat the summons was served on the defendant by Bunch Redmond, Deputy were the plaintiff and defe as alloged in the Complaint? ‘ rc : 74 r ¢ } nt a ANSWE : Sheriff of Iredell County, on October 16, 1952, by leavin’ with the defenda ANSWER: Yes. copy of the suumons, tocether with a copy of the complaint. nave the ,laintiff and défendant lived Separate and apart for two years prior to the inst‘tution of this action? oh@ . 4 ' - =e anc me ANSWER: That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the ts WSWER Yes. — o> TEN Ens iF) D ‘ . s , ik , ) DI l DJUDGED AND DECREED THAT 1@ DOr ‘ { allowed by law for the defendant to anewer has now elapsed, and no answer, , , [ the oonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the sam ar ; } in 1 defendan =) nd Same are her Ss demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. , i 4 ereby dissolved, : ana tne plaintiif granted an absolute divorce. ae This the llth day of April, 1953. That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff dem ands a sup certain . “3 | .; he s/f William T. Hatch in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under t TNT TNE CID ING ' : : t an ; contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; tha "A TRUE COPY" art and made 4 P Me P. Cooper Clerk of Supertor Court of Davidson County, North Carolina itemized verfied statement, marked "kxhibit A", was attached to, : , . . } . ; j G he — of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchases, t : its am of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all - credits arising out of the transaction. temized That the court finds from the duly verified complaint and the i that the Bias " verified statement attached to the complaint, and maked "Exhibit - seis of the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery F590) Ino, 5533 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH C AROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. JUDGMENT Ve ~— eee eee FRANK PARDUE 7 e coming on to be heard before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk his cause es : : f the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judg. of the ment against the defendant by default and inquiry; } - iA , . se 4 1 d and nd it avoDd : ; May 953 . summons issued in this action on the 14th day of 7, 4 $ - n ; Pp > j together with a i it further appearing to the court that said summons, And 1 ’ ppea y we a . ~ eo “A Ol i ay Pp a 1 , r ed on Vk a el eri V i 5 ’ t a earl. f to n cou J at 10 ans e > iemu rer ? and it Tur ner Aap 44; t e oO r t tn I ©Swer r ‘ Or ot im o file plead- 3 by the defendant and no extension of time to file ple vleadine has been filed bv the Ten hee 7ray “ ] i 4 \ } \ : t e d a ¢ ma\ be filed has d ae t thi time 11tnin macnn 1 a 4 © ¢ t j ne. s has ni p nte n 4 i rry\4 se expired; r 1 } aintiff have and JUD G! NO DECREED that the plaintiff - r wr \" T Uv 70) aay mm Ta 7 ‘ 7 (UW aly AUYUL 77 19, inMbna fa ; ws I ve A ¢ € f j ) la a oY award and eco - rT a I he de en ant ‘ r such Q res as a ‘ ury - ~ uagrem nt malinst Vii - ak + ’ +hna vw t 2 ‘ r armns 20 ted 4 > xt civil term a a a 2 u t the ne to determine the emourt 5 , le y, before a jury of the Sunerior Court of Iredell vounty, Ve of said damages. This 28 day of July, 1953. C . G. Smith - . - a Clerk of the Superior vou O91 fF Mo. 5553 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. G. R. Shever Phaintire, VS. M. F. Gaither and wife Margaret MM, Gaither, Defendants, This cause comins Clerk of the Superior Coy of July, 1953, on motion of ? In the Surerior Court Before the Clerk I ! FINAL JUDGMENT ! I ! ; On to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned rt of Iredell vounty, North Carolina, on this 29th day Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default fin that on the 25th complaint in the above Iredell County. Tat summons was the Sheriff of Iredell That the summons was served on the Iredell County, on June the summons, together sounty, and final, and it appearing to the Court: ale day of June, 1953, the plaintiff filed a Quly verified entitled ection, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of wien issued from this Court on the 25th day of June, 1953, to was returnable as provided by law, + -i- lefenda'ts by Sam Law, Deputy Sheriff of 25th and 26th, 1953, by leaving with the defendants a copy of ith a cony of the somplsint. ne Defendants * o answer was not >xtended, and the time + nts anSwer nas :.ow elapsed, and no inswer, demurrer, other pleadine « ion s been riled t lefendants, That the plaintif? « ited omissory note sued on in this action to the ndersigned Jle:k of the Superior Court of dredell Vounty, am the Court finds cnat the oririne! rincipal s eo te was i'welve Hundred JOllars and no vents (31,200, 0), together with interest € rate o' six per cent per annum from the date aturity until »aid, hat there was p2id on the above mentioned note, the sum of iwo Hundred Jo} leaving a balance due of interest from January dy 4T I§ REFOR:, recover of the defendant llars and no Cents (‘2 UC ), torether with int rest until Janus ie ’ 1950, weand Dollars ents (31,000.00), together with 1950, until 1d. AL i wy tiJt jit , 4 ) ) 7? 2) that the plaintiff J be dy , / r F : } an a arrar sit her the . S i? saitther and ¥v Li@, warrarev i.e Wal ier, l sum of “% 4 . es 6 sents (31,000.00), torether with interest at the rate ¢ o a no ,eN pay Vr Th and Vollars ®n a One Thousan until paid; together vith t} m from January 5, 1950 until paid; tog he ner annum i I Ss ix ner cent ner a vy the urt t of this action taxed b: ne v ° 2O¢ ol Aye icUl CGC. G@. Smith a ee sa oy a vlerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. “No. 5548 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 E MATTER OF THE CUSTODY AND CONTROL OF WILLIAM JUNIOR COMBS ORDER ee e¢ ef Judge of the tter coming on to be heard before the undersigned gz This ma cal he Supe riorYou s ior Court holding the June, 1953, Special Term of t uper Iredell County; — i earing to the Court that the petitioner, Lucille . : eg , and that to sa Clay J. Combs, were heretofore lawfully married, a respoment, ° | ae i there was born one dild, William Junior Combs, the j marriage an oi appearing to the Court that petitioner and respondent are now living in a state offeparation; r alleges md offers And it further appearing to the Court that petitione have the care, evidence that respondent is not a fit and suitable person to ad Be custody, and control of said minor child, and that peoaganian all offers evidence that petitioner is not a fit and suitable p core, custody, and control of said minor Ghis; dent investigation And it further appearing to the Court that no independe bility of the has been made as to the fitness of either party nor to the suita homes proposed to be furniehed by either of saidparties; de should be ™ © permanent order And the Court beingof the opinion that no p Superintendent s and de by the in this matter until a thorough investigation has been ma on ae ess 0 of Public Welfare of Iredell County, both as to the fitn the suitability of the proposed homes: on the aring = that the he as Is THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED BY THE COUR ’ 10, 1953, til August bove entitled matter be and the same ishereby cmtinued un a Iredell County Superior Court. It is fwther ordered that the Custody and control of the Junior Combs, be awarded to Mrs. R, F, of this Court, infant, William (Marie) Moose, pending the further orders It is further ordered by the Court that the petitioner, Lucille Combs, and be allowed to visit said child and under reasonable conditions: the Respondent, Clay J, Combs, at reasonable hours It is further ordered that mither of said parties be allowed to remove said child from the premises of Mrs, the home of Mrs. Moose while und It is Moose, and that neither of them shal] come to er the influence of any intoxicants of any kind, further ordered that the Superintendent of Public Welfare of Iredell County make an investigation of the personal fitness of petitioner and respondent to have the care, custody, and control of said minor child, together with an ness of thehome R. F, Moose, and to make a written repo investigation 48 to the fit of petitioner's mother and the Mrs, home of rt thereon to the Judge holding the August, 1953, Term of Iredell Superior Court. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell C ounty Order to petitioner, Superintendent of Public Welfare of Iredell County This deliver a certified copy of this respondent, Mrs R, F, Moose, and the Order is made without prejudice to the rights of petitioner and respondent in this matter, This the 26th day of June, 1953, George B, Patton, JUDGE PRESIDING, ‘eek RR eK eee HH a a eer rae PRESS 1 eg ee i ra te ‘ beceer a 2 ots Pee FTE Min OS eevee. See ents (31,000.00), torether with interest at the rate « c ny no 2eEnN 3 po ys YD Thousand Vollars *na ! | . One Thousan ; r 5, 1950 until paid; together vith the 14+ ner annum from Jvanuary ), 41> per cent per @ action taxed by the Vourt. ha G, Smith ‘ vlerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. “No. 5548 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JUNE SPECIAL TERM, 1953 IN THE MATTER OF - oie THE CUSTODY AND CONTROL Q WILLIAM JUNIOR COMBS This matter coming on to be heard before the undersigned aaa Superior Court holding the June, 1953, Special Term of the Superior%ou eae Cece to the Court that the petitioner, Lucille ae respomient, Clay J. Combs, were heretofore lawfully married, oo a marriage there was born one dild, William Junior Combs, the su aoe appearing to the Court that petitioner and respondent are now living in a state offseparation; r alleges md offers dod it further eppearing to the Court that potitone have the care, evidence that respondent is not a fit and suitable person to aa custody, and control of said minor child, and that ee to have the offers evidence that petitioner is not a fit and suitable p care, custody, and control of said miner Chie} dent investigation And it further appearing to the Court that no independe aise a has been made as to the fitness of either party nor to the suita ther of saidparties; homes proposed to be furniehed by ei ail a e Superintendent s and t orde And the Court beingof the opinion that no permanen a made by in this matter until a thorough investigation has been ae ess 0 of Public Welfare of Iredell County, both as to the fitn the suitability of the proposed homes: —— ii IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED BY THE COURT t ’ 10, 1953, til August bove entitled matter be and the same ishereby cmtinued un a a Ld Iredell County Superior Court, deliver a certified copy of this the in this matter. O93 | a Seen a aeetreresteesneteersnennsisnecenetenesstenamaennsenesemenens ee It is further ordered that the custod Junior Combs, of this Court, y and control of the infant, William be awarded to Mrs, R. F. (Marie) Moose, pending the further orders It is further ordered by the Court that the petitioner, Lucille Combs, and the Respondent, Clay J, Combs, be allowed to visit said child at reasonable hours and under reasonable conditions: It is further ordered that mither of said parties child from be allowed to remove said the premises of Mrs. Moose, and that neither of them shall come to er the influence of It is further ordered that the the home of Mrs, Moose while und any intoxicants of any kind, Superintendent of Public Welfare of Iredell County make an investigation of the personal fitness of petitioner and respondent to have the care, custody, and control of said minor child, together with an ness of thehome R. F, Moose, and to make a written repo investigation 48 to the fit of petitioner's mother and the Mrs, home of rt thereon to the Judge holding the August, 1953, Term of Iredell Superior Court. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell C ounty Order to petitioner, respondent, Mrs R, F, Moose, and Superintendent of Public Welfare of Iredell County. This Order is made without prejudice to the rights of petitioner and respondent This the 26th day of June, 1953, George B, Patton, JUDGE PRESIDING, ee eK eK ee ke ew / No. 5527 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK J. He Thompegn and W. L. Neely, Jr., T/A Statesville Insulation Company, Plaintiffs -vs- JUDGMENT Sam L. Davis, nn This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on this the 7th day of August, 1953, on motion of Scott, Collier, & Nash, Attorneys, for judgment by default final; And it appearing to the Court that the action was instituted in this Court on May 8, 1953, to recoer upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and @livered by the plaintiff to the defendant, and that the summons was served on the defendant on the 15th day of May, 1953; And it further apoearing to the Court that in the action based on tie account, there is due on said account the sum of Two Hundred Seventy-two and 02/100 ($272.02) Dollars, with interest at 6% from October 17, 1951, until paid; that Complaint was served on the defendant on May 15, 1953, but that the defen- dant has failed to answer or otherwise plead in the cause, and it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against the defendant; IT IS, THERUFORE, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Sam L. Davis, the sum of $272.02 with interest from October 17, 1951, at the rate of 6% until paid, torether with the costs of this action. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court kee KK Ke we ee ee ) No. 5527 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK J. H. Thompsgn and W. L. Neely, Jr., T/A Statesville Insulation Company, Plaintiffs «veo JUDGMENT Sam L, Davis, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of th Superior Court of Iredell County, on this the 7th day of August, 1953, on motion of Scott, Collier, & Nash, Attorneys, for judgment by default final; And it appearing to the Court that the action was instituted in this Court on May 8, 1953, to recoer upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and @livered by the plaintiff to the defendant, and that the summons was served on the defendant on the 15th day of May, 1953; And it further apvearing to the Court that in the action based on tle account, there is due on said account the sum of Two Hundred Seventy-two and 02/100 ($272.02) Dollars, with interest at 6% from October 17, 1951, until paid; that Complaint was served on the defendant on May 15, 1953, but that the defen- dant has failed to answer or otherwise plead in the cause, and it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against the defendant; IT IS, THERUFORE, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Sam L. Davis, the sum of $272.02 with interest from October 17, 1951, at the rate of 6% until paid, torether with the costs of this action. C. G, Smith ae Clerk Superior Vourt Kee KK ee me eK ee No. 5527 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK J. He Thompsgn and W. L. Neely, Jr., T/A Statesville Insulation Company, Plaintiffs <a JUDGMENT Sam L. Davis, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on this the 7th day of August, 1953, on motion of Scott, Collier, & Nash, Attorneys, for judgment by default final; And it appearing to the Court that the action was instituted in this Court on May 8, 1953, to recoer upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and @livered by the plaintiff to the defendant, and that the summons was served on the defendant on the 15th day of May, 1953; And it further apoearing to the Court that in the action based on tie account, there is due on said account the sum of Two Hundred Seventy-two and 02/100 ($272.02) Dollars, with interest at 6% from October 17, 1951, until paid; that Complaint was served on the defendant on May 15, 1953, but that the defen- dant has failed to answer or otherwise plead in the cause, and it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against the defendant; IT IS, THERUFORS, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Sam L. Davis, the sum of $272.02 with interest from October 17, 1951, at the rate of 6% until paid, tosether with the costs of this action. C. G. Smith ae Clerk Superior Vourt kRK KOK OK eR KK Ke KH State of North Carolina Department of Archives and Historp Raleigh CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY This is to certify that the microphotographs appearing on this reel are true and accurate reproductions of the records listed on the target (title) sheet preceding each volume or series of records microfilmed hereon; that the records were microfilmed on the date and at the reduc~- tion ratio indicated; and that on the date of microfilming, the records were in the custody of the official or other individual listed on the target sheet(s). It is further certified that the records listed on the aforesaid target sheet(s) were microfilmed in conformity with the provisions of Sections 845.1 - 845.4, General Statutes of North Carolina; and that in order to insure archival quality and authentic reproduction of records filmed, they were microfilmed in the manner prescribed,and with equipment and film approved, by the State Department of Archives and History. — (Signed) | le Camera Operator Mircrofilmed by North Carolina Bepartment of Archives and History Bivision of Archives and Manuscripts Raleigh, North Carolina IREDELL COUNTY ee ee ee MIN DOCKET S C VOL «St YEARS 1953 1954. PAGES oy he FILMED 6 23 665 RED RATIO 16 1 i NS ct i ah Ak en Eid -_—- ee ee remy . Aa State Hen, ny Co-2/ Au State E Gui pl. Ce- GO (Areher, Frew. RR - 9 (Arehev's Ford Stare 947 AtKins, ery Kw Itt? | Aicten, Arlene /- 182 «sy Aohe, Wayne 1/70 itive 32 17? Atlantic Furn. Products le. dmc — 1257 Aides Finmse Co. inc. ATG hate faets » £lec. Qo. - 343 Andeews, Aletha - 372 Allen, Lugene - #0a-B, 44) Allisan, a. th 3B #44. #24 Alezandee, Lanest - 4355 ¢¢ Alexzandes, Atady - #42, ’ Abel am S, dd he hioods Jéw p23 / J2F See enn ae ere eee re ae } Byers, PW.2 6 | | Buned, Les. F.4.- 348, 5/9 [PF ewers, Richard GL of bad Harcheey -~ 333 | Bynum , Carl Err. 3 | Bunton, Dan K- 399 | IBraasew, Chas. G.-s | ie, Si ko 4 (Bussell Clyde dr- G, ae, /I} Beaed Fvely, T- 402-6 gs | Brewley, al, Samuel -f, a Bailey, Ellis - 62-4, kre Bensen, oy eae /3 Bustle, Clyde TA - #327, ¢35 | Barlow Glenn J- IG jos nw ten, gle, Dadele » Lah “ar Briqman, Robert 5s -2/. 7, 422, 1/283 Beaver, prazre/ -H, 123 Butts, Denald b.- FOS, SIBLSYS (Behe, Marvin T— 3¥ Macun, Tas. i - dad Brawley, Mee 3 — 4 Bteun, Tomes he - Cbg Brown, VR. Ia | Bekee, Muis w- va¥ Boiler lee dy} 5. 2) Brown, Tee wW- ¥72 Gamaarner , Rey -//4, fa) Loan, oh de N_ 499 Ga ley , Kear's B- /i/ Benticeld Mabel 6.-S4e Henae, Shirley O- 14/ Bramer, Frank -38| S Bum aarner, Bjll D- 122, 2e/ Bromner, Minnie MeCray - 565 Barnes, Kathteen G- 1/37 Barnette , Thomas £-/#éb te Olarkweea, Hubeel Ww /s7 a Brown, C.C 1 7/ Barer Dorman b- (£6, ger Custle, ws A- / 4% , Fer Bakex, Bein EK -a03 Bailey » Oavil - 208, 453, £26, ¢4/,5g2 Bayter, Harry - 307 Bunton tdi Dn ate se () Brown, Raleh - 333, asy Brawley pwn K-27 Brawley Seed, GC. Den Barn hard bethy Ath. Ah Beaver, C.W. - AFB Beaver, Moper h-2¥5> 297 7 Blankenshig, WAL Tr. 3/8, 484 Bukgess, Wm. g),~ 430, 917, ¢02-A a Y Block, Rebeat t.- etal - 3%, Ho beauvec, Geo & — 453 beavee, Lugene ad - 37/ | Campbe// Eli -6, 13 | Cochvan, fear | C- c £3e,526 | Cae son, Henny - 4I2-B | Can pbell dames -f° 1325, 19s T-3 49 | Cleaey, TN — 404 | Claw, ae a {2 i 2e | Cook, Clyde A. Ts ~ 366 sor i | Cly burn, #6. -T2 - ¥/3 | Crouch , Dempsey - af | Cavk, Emm a7 me a ; Cooper, Anuie H- 443 Coopers GLoe. Shree - ¥43 Click ae? as 12S; 257 \530 } Cunteg, ihe in ee | Cashion, b.R. has ae, 12 2, ait, 24, 9C0 Comwall Fiyfuve. Covp— KF | Ceump, F hanes 4)- #6 Creedmeve, F£ rSons _ s°7 Coong, Liutse £18 - €9¢ LledSelter, Hare/L A -C/ | touch, (7b. - ¥%o Combs, W% Jr—- by | Crawson, Halbevdt Fe Iu, — $6! Cometon, RQ - 73 Lheh, Wilhe - $62,531 Sj Cometen£lectie ©- 93 Campbell, Temas Willen = 52! (Carr, Wenene - 10% 120,525 Chamber les'n, Hal - S24 Se Chuveh, faul- 76-6, 2047 bs¥ Crary, Mary D Ash - 952 Campbell Henry Rebt— 1/6 Consolidated Greers Carp. -568 Chambery (Rosa lea - 4/28 Gerley » bois G- 135% 13C Chrisky. Marthe O- /4a Cerra) Metis! Ins Co- / oS Careli wa “Vr actor Vv E gail. Coe 173. Ca bell, Theresa ?- (S%, 48 CuMent, Chas. (76, /9¥ Chambers Wvoodvow- 794 /9F (¢y Currence,- as. Cansino, Seba<tian- 198, 2e F a Campb«Il, Glenn - 2e®, 4335, ¥37 Caudill, Setty Jean W- Avs 7 7/6, W/7, Hu7 Cashion, Z. (t- aaa, 2384 293, 137 4 Cv gman s tS} /he lng ine o MT Clendenin , mntett Ab? Comer, w%® FL ws 5 Canceling Nihdee Ly. - 26 i. Cotfex, Walt- 349, #45, F276 Cuntey, Vivian — 353 ClaeK, Matuin- 85-S" Clark, Philipine- Sf Ss; 434A \Curke, Lenteade £- 35%, $44 | PTs i | LDisen, Willevd b- 2 yor 1 7H\ 349, e520 Dickens [fP.be- Fe Dison, Zeb UX SB Di jon, Wanke 4 ONE 1/57 ete TA. cee Jed Deaton, C.m. 196 ‘Donalison , Came A220 Dic Kens, mrs Rachel -14¢ 242 jDeomestic beans Jac .2é0 Davis, RW. Ty - 263, #66 Davis "rQy Ce - Abs fee Drie Radic sueely ‘ame ~32/ Deal Lindh -~#IE YU Darnel/, Selle F. -~I%, Driscoll Distributing C0.,Ine. -S/b Davenport, aS DO. -S5ar Davis, Arvin Pause -b23 . Davis, TH..I4%,-587 os FRO | | | } Emerson, Eugene ©-3, /96, 557 ‘Evans, Huerv] C-32 Evins, RAL 1m Fnolish, Ernest BE ao/ Fagle, aude J - 487 Fagle, HA. -¥8% Echerd Horace K-52 Eagle, Mrs.J. 0. =25.8/ 4 Gi rf ; oa a ay * e i faa +: od | Elmore, Guy R32 JOf, WT [Emerseon, Eugene ao 196,337 Evans, Huer] C-52 Eins, RA 1% | | | | it Faplik, Erneit” B- 20/ 4 mae i Fagle, Maude I - #97 os | £ ag/e, pA. -¥88 Echerd, Horace f-5.29 Eagle Mrs. JC. -55/ J Me Mind cM em ee ae , ti tinBA Doobie Bde renee - . > | Fespermaw , Trey - -2, 1d], 194, 349, bes Fox , marshell fi- G »2?, 108/97 5 Fog, 7ienneth “- Ly, Ao, 106147, 31° Farrell, Ralob £- 5, ea | Foy, Jesse -4& Frye, Glenn D- W ‘Pot, Tehu. 2/9 Foaleman, Ruth F- 243, 24% 29d 247 arz 253 Fat, willie B. — 368 |Facees, Vas-P)asen- #34 4% Fox, fay mond 4 - ¥70 \Faecere, Bennie R- 4F6, $51 Flowers, Fau/, -507, Farbenhs G., the — $/3 | OF: Gray, a 2, 105, 194, 24, #4, 2 0 Gaither, Clement- % 1%, 107, /97, | ¥9 Gregory, Frances. G | Qs Tus Regert I sa)215, Wo/, Zar Cilleland WG _2e ,22,/76 353 (,ecdvum , WW- #° | | CilbexT, Paul — 66 Goble, eye 3- 72 Garris, dohn E -/0¥, 122, /157Z/ Croom, Chas.w- /°7, Lo-~ 4% 44 Gillehont, Anerle. /26 Gi, Sohn > 17% bereen, Elijah — 2 Griffin, WilberY H- 207 Rivers, m.@_a3/ 232, Gaither, Ernest ff. AT7e Goforth, da f. - Ava Gillaland H.£.- 2/6 Goeden, L. - 348 eed Pad Rave Fuen. Ce.- 38 Ekesham, Dennis- 353 baithee, W Sankey Mime 2, FID, f 9S fraithee, MS. -Dee- ¥02, fos, J95 Eilbeat Engg. Co. #42 B Esdman, Kenneth - #09 Gosdman, Ftank- £11 Gi He land, Jas. £ - ¥87, 433, 435 btskam, Howanad A - 435°, sede oom, Chanles—¥9¢-Je4- 46 77 Foggy leal/-£06 Crmann Comp} on Mitors, Ine -52 bi / war. H.C. -363 ores re aes RE SHSS oe \Maen is. Ra \Newe //, E a. | | a Hemi nps , dames G- 3, /24, 146 tense. tis H- 4, 19 7 /aeey I i] M Kewtirray sey Hayes, Cameron H- laardif 19S") | Haraer , iy a. ©, 2 Heath, Trey - 6,13, 34%, au | Heover , Nevin lod oe , 520 | Harding, Lena Kk - 367 eR ston, Bethy 2 73... | Hence, Métmand - 3% | Honeycutt, Clack M- 422-4, #1, ¥S7 1 Ail, Lael - 402-68 3S! eis George - % {2a a 198s So, #16, 5.20 | KepKins, wm —/F Hudson, Fred w- S$, 16°, 16/ Harris, Harvey -S@,437 Heftshouser , of. b- IF, 226, Hoe | AOU, ar: ae ¥/7 fit, Fasad - 427, i2/ ' helt houser, 4loise 4 -—-¥¥7 Hay ee, 4%2'se — od Keleemb ws ClyLenn.. 7,193. Hwaed, Naney D - der —_ J 2. 3. Sneccengl. S72 Hacks, Clay ~ ¥77 Maren, Rata. WA. en 77 Wichen Oley ~ - on ne i PF Hail differ C. 7, 101, L9%, a¥9 age, Vanee -££6, SS/ Har bin, bt. 2 JId Hb. Ls. Jane ot Stetesyiffe - 083 Head Stamey - A sein Harr:'s, Mrs. haura 7. -5//, Jo/ te//and, R. OC sez, fag= £4 4f Hellar, Venee Thames J /, $3) a Heal Gryaur 4jm — f/foO Hemmings, Ps Ray - 422 Hutchine, Richard - (or Mayer, Claudia - 7¥8, Lo¥, £90, 49) ead , rs. ALA-78 4, 26 forver Nev Ss. (#z Hutchins, Sylvia B- 196 Houston, Pe mpsherh, -~323 Honeycutt, Robert h/ -J535/ Henderson Wanaw J (94, 352, ¥SE AFL rege , Oobby bo- Be’ ye Harwell, Tas, @. 207 ass HAE SI5 Hubbard , Allene - A2F, 227 Mo Haman, Betty 4. - ay ¥, 252 Hankine, Oy Fue - 229 Holland WR 277, 29 ¢ Hartness , Thos, gE ~AzIy, 295 Merten, Spence . Ivy fbte/ G rage . ae # «ZB Ls os Statesville, Dne.- 3 ¥), Haw A's, Lillie Y, . save gssnd Cc a as4 gene -357 H _ (68 ingre”, Van B. | | reenhoue, Atwell u- a 5S, 43 ¥+,520 hethus A. --042 ‘Zeeland, Engkom, Jones, Anse] — + | | Tones, Gill -BL IH | | Aenes, Arthur & - 3, 101,/76, 457, 44, 54) | Tohkasen, Mrs. ¢. be- 44 pad! | Johnson, C.k- A, 22, 334 Justice, Helen +tt- 27 Tones, ar wet -$/ Savvis, Thomas - (62, JOS > /63 Jectins, R. & - 17S Johnson, Hack R_ 19? 19D 2of | Tele, Franig 1%, Zne +477 dohnsen, (45. A.W. ( Dunk) - 254 Tohnsen, A.W. ( Dunk )- 252 Wineon, Mand & - aot TenK'ns, Gtady f)-37¢ cones, Lnez 7. - 3% Jenkins, Odis 6 - £324 denKins, Mes. Clade D- ¥7/, 477 Clones, John H - ¥4%6 dohnason, Jemes Ldwerd -~$29 a nie i , me) | | ae iy ih || | : | i | ie l4 / HB Ae i teal! | i} ie 1) i | Kennery as C.= a, 1F4 > #20 ‘Min , 2a - 144, 17, 2F?, 520 Anop, Chas H- 114, 1957450, f2e 550 | Kitehings, das. D- 392 inky, aid = OF King, Yas. @- BYF - 402-4 KabereK, £.77- 444-6 Krett, W. 5. - #Aa Kis Hee, Prarie w) - #55” Tiler, Clenuenthuid tine Henn yor - 363 | teak Nelsen c— Away Jol, IT te Lunsford Edgar — ae lracKey , bb (Bi II) te 9S, YAS bytten, bester sere feo ber a 16 \ } 4 aaa, | Lytten, nys - Ajice f- 37 | by owrmee, &.1- 94, Ar Linney » Edger - #l fod hittlesohn | Marie. » 19S— hiftle, David ! (3G baiiaevl's bas «17a bamver Oscay S— 14,4272 backey , Melvin C -A24 pee, &w. asd bpackey, Marie A- ae! bittle, David. ~3/7 L/tHe, Ruby - 3/79 Little, lldeenee & - 444, 369 Lazenby A Jon ¥egeme ky Hd. Co. 3h Lambect, Hehn O- 35%, BFC, f87 hbambect, 9scae JT- 35% Mackey, Flayd @ - as7 pane, Ogiee - 357, #33, SIS Lam beat. Denald Fi- 708-4, 584 Little, $.A.- 402-6 hLazenhy, Johnny - 4AT, $33, ABS ham beet, Sas- dee- £36, €4/ hackey, Betts 6 - v4 7 Lowman, Algevia -~ 4359 heonand, Dew sth « fr) - #£6 Ls dees z. Jams s Via jp h- $3! hambert, Thad /'homas-52f hock lear, Jun - 525,549 Aewis, John i - $238 4y t/a, MS env2er-8S/ a = - Se as naa \ | | H | i} i | | | ro -G Id, er | Prock, Phillip - $03 -B, 472, 476, 49/ oore, Jporen | Richard Au o, 12 | | Messiek, Beis?! A- 43.8 Yr" \\s, Marlin , Jimmie = Morr, Hu ah Ray - | A.m- 33 | Masen, FRed F — #47, 424 G 15, 7, Joms, Jom -.. H Praelewe, 3-4. — #70 Payers, Mayhew, yengeline a As \Pporee, Hatold 2- ¥32, fj, 47) maar’ » b.c- AG | fa tReason, Kobt- D-¥#¥/ Moervisen, — $ ~-<s™ (7 00se, Andy Jd - 4% fs | Noere, 1: s - oF, aS Y | Boa, 49 Mon shel, Colleen A- #59 Nikon, nh - W Ppeeee Field, Kibeet H- ¥74 Wryers five. Service, Rein 72 7) ‘fthe M, Augene = 476 yiller, Ned Deven - -/7a yo! fehel, Te€bie ~- ¥76 Miller, Danie} - 74 1) edotk, Buddy 4) - AI} ,5.2/,borb Yi Wer Mack. 421, /9¢, Zaf, far Mong an, &¢o. - FF, 33/ | / — “e o miller, G/ean F- 706, 122, 2// Ppitiees Ms YWlorrison , ¥71"5 ath Sr - (53 Nore, Hermen— $62 Mecre, Jahn w- /7/, OOF Morrison, Mary Sharpe we FOS Mooresville, Youn of- ail 173) IS 2FS 829 Mist ead, Ma mond — 547 yrt A ry Mranite] a Table Ce ~ /7Y chess, oe £7 7 Pillee, Marlen, Dillard Robert -37),27 3/2 /"ason, LD. &- (§ Malt Fred, Jr. -321, Jar ; Mayberry , Zera A-l4¥ Mase, Richard WAN) ~ 731,424 Marlowe, Wm R- /87 Myore, Jshn dL -$22 —_ Morrison, Jimmie K- el, 3352, a7 Mow bray, Wiha arn Mess, George BY a Meadows. Hh. £. - FS? Miller, A. C. 265~ Mize, George 4 ~ $47 Mi //s, Akh. eu Ab Mis LB. Cin Co ~ 266 Mitche/I, Herman -26¢6¢ \oore . Herman —- 27 ¥ Marien | Perl . 272 Marion, Wt G - Ata. Myees Tine Seavice oF Stv/ Enc, BFS Nyers, iIm- S- 357 (\oee, Haecsld & - 358 Moone, B.F. - a60, 447 P\aalewe, a) m- C Kerghven -3%6 Mintgrmeny, Alexandee # - 3\¢% Piller, 6.2 - 3490 ane Cs. 4 #or-B £73, £74, #4) | | rmtKessen, hous “Ir- 3, se ©, 5 MCfe/fand, ohn - Fos ineclellend, Chas, £- AL, 14 | metal Viele 47 WM anghlen, ieaiteee 72, Ing J Rexry, mary D- 44/, 222 mtpaviel, Heyle - 2357 MDaniel, merge - F356 Mo bp-ha-, Vance. ~ 33 Me lsefee, Tames Wm. - S6/ tye Aacr~, Vane’ #76 } Ay A, / , 2 le Ginn KF hRhantces 4/6 Me Chacken, Edad 2 = 4A FP, Hak 4 ¥0 47 } } Nich olsen, Wits. ~ $9! | Newton, 2H. - 3 s7 Nesbit, i. Lynn = foe -3 , £0,557 ie VN, 7/F [Mooresville Produts Ce. | 4 North Lroline, 5444 of -51A Hagel, Cyde W418 Dxdars Vriatiaao 6 Rea. 74) i | | Overcash, mys benam- Ws, 427 Dueveash ; Tames bent sad¢y¥ Dvereash, Geokge Y. Opens, Sm. 4-359 Ognamental shone Co =~ £05. Ostwalt, Jhinley C - 36c we y Ss 4 SSFP > x 2 “ 2 ‘* ¥ > rs g ™ v Nd “it 2 3 ° ~,, ~ ( ¢ — ere -___, o “ J ‘ . ee —e ne o } i URS? — fd) ee } VES = ea i} Pos Fs P a f 2 om a ae Seid, Walter O- 7 | Piexce-, feo bertz. G— é 2, 392 | Prat Bertie 1 — GF flerea., renk - a, /03 | Mice, Walter, dm (°F, JP s | Teaver, Memphis 4--72@, jlo | Ayler , Rew| (?- 196, 102 Lng ——liedinc dees a Penne, Vas. F- /A/ foigert, D/a Mee m- (FA Plain, deen 4 Ge « 186 ae Toorbey, Clifford be» (4G, 197 Pee . Phillips, Clifford W- 196 177, aoe Paterson, Virgil -197, 2¥, 350 elmer Bk ute Co. 6p Vargo. a @ 324, BIS 7 fo Piedmont Foam Aguip- Go. - 335- | | | People's Loan v Sevings BK- 347, £Al, 494 hisee, Hee man - 359 f3e Pride cdl Lumben. ¢ 1) Fg « Co- 39 / fesple s Aban Saving Bf - $40,317 Farher, Koss -52/, 529 resne /L, Jach-523 Farks, ( layton MN. - saz Privette, Farline Mayberry -£4/ Potts, dlie B- Syn Fachey, Mary Mlexendler, J5/ Fronkice Hall, ITne.- Ibs Pithens, Hevberk L.- 349 om — se = = sm ee 4 eg ae ae = a PR ee re | ! 3 SwEhi Start = Shwe Sen ee eee Qe eee a Ramsey, Guy - a» : Rash, mack ey ee) Reynolds, Resem*%, Hal £ - 12.2., 204, POS) gf | wet. 194, ad 17 ‘Rumepley Rey fu G, FS, )0® i Reavi>, Jt F- POM, WF Resse, Paul -™ — | 7D | | Rash, Gristel, 122, (25> 163, Ven, 146 won ry - ee /{ oss, Joe Y- 147 Reeves, Jack wW-139 Rowe, Ellen 7— /S2 Reid, Hilda Uo 76,197, 9 Rape, Binny 1 Reil, Ray R- ae] Reavis, Viele? AO - 277 Ai tehie, Pes. Natiiell - 341 hoseboee, Eaelne D- > 5% 35¥ Kose bore, Wij) - 259, 355 Kesebe cough, W'jl- 350, 35ST Kober son, Gene “- 387, 35%, #47 Reinhaedt, Rabt - 357, #37, 4¥1 Ramseut, Elizahbe Yh ~- 359 Redmond, b.@. - #4 Robbins, Cael). - #a& Kaby, JA £33, 4¢2,5F/) S32 Kedmend, Temes S- 82 Koadway Ex peess,Zne - ¥e2 Rebinsen, Boyd M. -S3S Aichardson, Bath Eluse €-$37 Yaby, Demps y —_ —-3S43 { | | ‘ > — 344, vee, oa ] Span, Ray mond S Sith, Geerge m- 3 191, 444 ‘ Shufore, lsennie~ > Bigmen , B™ P- 7; 2/ Smith, berber 7- G,12, oti Keleather, Tommie- € Shoemelser , Quince - 7 mith, John Cink y - 4414 Stutts, watson ~Le 19 Sheves!L 7 17, /24, Peo Je Southers , Derethy ¢ l 7 Southers, Howard 7- /7 Shwer, J. GA StricklanL, Caper ->/ aperks , yjarthe. P77 4a& Simmens, Bessie J — Sh Amit, Atieewr. {nex _— Shay pe, rank bo, a iia es =, Sher t| lL, auva i “oy _- go Jaq ’ Elvy D- ?. We Heinbaryer, m,8~ 76 At stesville Saage t Tuva Cus a Fh SheamaKer, fe/i x - So, 473 Stim psen ‘ Hubert - 4O¢, 144, Por Dhetuecd, Figen, Glenn /eH¥, 1/07 Shue, Ralpa- f76 Ami thy Nancy G- FA Stetes ville, tity of ~ 434 5b 35/ She adm an, NAR ilew, #0a-b, 495, 487 Smith, Kesec/la &. Poqthern Asphelt- Kee wr Ge- (45 (om itk, aJinena, -AA Shanon bardner Pu 4P/ Service o// Co- (7 Fates v,) lay Ga Co . (7% /&/ wowers, Ne// 8-/7¥ phase, in, a- = AYs mith, Atmnes, D0 Av, 406, POF mall, Jas. Ae 203 fmt, hidlie dal 706, deh, gill | Shackelhed, (143. YJaney Martie } ; : ; herridl, Oovala w Aos, 4d? | ; | Springs Cotta a7 /lis- 19 | 9 Seuthern Frichion Meatenals G-/¥ | ami}K Mrs Chloe - 207, 22 ¥ | dlean, Mary 4- 2/2 \im/}kt, Cather'ne 4- nj | Star Milling, Co- PAX, 231, 333 \Seott John RW. 225-439-375 (SHecKwel, Wervgere? A. 2a? Shoemaker, --O- 230 Seat, Jevry haa yo A talarlle Se ad ASE, ¢/¢, 54S Sleep, Katherine D.26/ Sloop, tt ab3 Aouthern Plane Co Ine. r292— Smivn, ‘4ymond A 32H, 376 Smith, &.J. e6a/- 3357 Stallings, Pyary Ctew- 33%, #4? ih ha ads foe cK G. Bt 3 Shoe ma kK ex, Manue| - A¥?, 4a a SLeemaket, Robeat. 7. — 454 S</t, Darnes Pi lseed ao < A i Sdazenes, Ce Lady - 335 ¢#O Shanpe, Zennie ul - 334 Sa) 4¢ e ’ peat res &S 7 Maaevad 565 Shaepe, W. Fhess, Dec. 379 Sate Delle: thew S- ¥6a £8 Saundees, Seenen 4 fsa . 4 “ames ne +M7eating ee os ar @sm//e cd : '/ 4/9, $4 Staley, Busy Edwand- £29 | theeadil, 2 4.-—#a4 Sptaks, Wavy Aha V | Ssheetrll, Kuth o £¥¢9 | Se0lt, Delicitkee > ¥b be, G7 | 5u4“ty wl b Cia YGA Seutheen Flee. Seer, Gitnet+ o9 } } ? | 4 it | | sw/t, Laverence. W.-497 Nes. Goer B..At ~ os were (la Sharpe, Frank h.,d 4. - 843 Stallings , Mary ress ~ 565 Stradley, Kalph A - 4/4, \Summers,Neaberk lurner- 521,654 Sarles, hevi farvson-42] Shouse, Paul Kupert SAS, 5249 Smith, Robert 4.22 Sherrs//; da it Henry IBY Seoktt, J. 6.-S32 Spealts, Prey Vang hten is/ Stok hk, Dollei*hey Smyre-J4/ oyhes, CA-55| Lake svi //e Siok w 6 bach Se eee oe - ac = re { = By s= oe tl e weg ' a Mi al | é om Ng a r if | "i | Tayler, Reath - 3, J4S7 fre | ‘Jucker, Amoas- 3, /Ad, 1987 foe, 435 Tarmac, marvin D- &, 22, f0 51197, 272 | Tredt mary, C2 Siu 77 | ! Trivett, wm £. (ox, sos, /b4, “Tayler, Robert /7- /°4 Teague, Fred ~ W/Z Thempsen, of. €- 117 Turner, Jelia A- 199, 19/ Trowtman, £. T-—26°7 [eve pau kh, Velo fl az/ TRalmob./e, Tne. - 339 | | | | | Thomypsen, Lsasah 249, 254, 460, YASH 34, £47 Tutner, Hattie C - 260, 38, $37 Thompson, as.F - 370 Tutnee, 7.0. - FRB Tilley, Bobby a — 447, 428 Thomas, Nude/yp, - 487, #36 hetne bueg, Billy Aas. - Y3¢,52/ Yuin States Tns- Co- 47/1, ¥77 Seine , dames Edward - 21, £4 Try jeke, 4re hie 324, $3/ ; | harpe i "lara Syhes -539 2 4 | 7 er Jamas A- Um bere | 7 Ud. g A unten — { } oll, be Om. Al pol, FA: 349, MAEM Miams, Mas. 4.0. ~ 494, 475 with “om ud 2. r. 2 72, jo? i} G/sHiams, Clade - ¥7¢ det ev sy 7 ‘Weeten, Vimmie i 7 i Woods, Fred E -# Fe, J5/ Waldell carr’s ¢- 7 White, rhamas H- Hil White, Luther —/&, 123,, (9S 349 faesad Williams, Ine Lb - peo Webs ter, luther Fug ene -323,$3/ Weather man, Ro bey 7 rw 20°, NE, AH, 354, #4¢ S20 Woods, Joseph | ae Y. Waugh, Garticll V- 23 roden., Fannie Ww 3° Waosgh, CB - 5S Wiiame, Arthur- Af Wagner, J. 1. S64 Wamsley ’ Isaac - “+ Wi/[:ams, Nowen - 762 Wilsen, George ~ 12%, 108 WI sen, Paul QL yor Wester , Clyde RsoFP Wi Ili ams, Aecy ust is f. (re Warren, lw ao sin 19 Onte, yates a- /4a3— Weeten, Rachel C-/32 Ware, Car/ O- (29, Jel Wa/Ker, James (P.Jr - (#7 beet huifred P-~ 14/ White, Raby C~ {ha Watt, dee - 776, /97 Williams, “F2re/d - /78 Wilson , 2 phon _ 2057 350 Willi ams, Claya -2¥F, Bum, 246,744 As] W Bowes, Comon /?t - AT2za Weber, we, dow 244 Westen, Catheene ~ 357, 354, 440,332 Withelm, Benton & 337, 35%, 340 Waugh, KRassell Ff - 3393 Whisht, Hoeace Y - 359 Walken, Fcaest 35% / . White, Kobeed 4E0 Williamson, Matgaretl H-377 Btnjyms Wellman Odell — 428, 52/ t) + /36n, Howatd Ef ~4G4, snipped ie ree = Tuner te mM - @, _ ‘enitd Yavid - $25,527 ene, S Young, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «--<----=- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 3rd, 1953 ith | f yoRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for ae eaves seiaiaepe abide saiescos sia = the County and State aforesaid, at the Courthouse in Statesville, N.C, on the 3rd day of August, 1953, at 10:00 o'clock, A. M., when and where a ee ee ee His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, Fall Term, 1953, is present and presiding and Honorable Zeb A, Morris, Solicitor and prosecut- ing Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, i is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J. C. Rumple, h , i High Sheriff of Iredell Couttt’y is present and opened Court by Order of the ii Court. , J, C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court My | the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the First Week of this the August Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior Court, | to-wit: Ht C. V. Campbell R. D. Clodfelter James T. Hubbard i Oscer M. Williams Clifton Shumake M. G. Queen | Fred Jolly Frank Hillard Osborne Smith 4. 0, 0. Sloop Ross Hall John T, Gill ; ¢. H. Goodwin Hill Sherrill William Brown | Miss Dottie Jarvis H. L. Moore George Wilson | William A. Christie Paige Beatty L. B, Holleman W. L. Hines D. C. Sherrill John 8S, Raynal 4. ¢, Rummage Lee G. Lackey C. D. Snow San H. Deaton Willard Bowers C, E, Stewart XW. Gabriel Lawrence Lapish L. M,. Brown Allen McGee Mre. Ora T. Reavis F, N. Beaver 9. R. Goble W. F. Taylor R. G. Tharpe Glenn Sigmon Mrs. Harold Wilson F, M, Sloan Claude D. Madi son Earl Nance R. L. Mullis Mes Lou Dulin Clarence Adams C, E. Bundaey Mra. Lackte Frye F, W. Whitlow II E, Price Furr » 6 “loaninger W. G. Blankenship H, D, Jolly c. V, Ca mpbell, J. C. R ex » Vs. Rummage, Mra. Mra. Ora T. Reavis were used by Doctor's eered ae ove Lackie Frye and Mrs. Ora » 0, § loop, Hil} Sherrill and R. G, Tharpe were not returned. Mise D Ottle Jarvis was excused by the Clerk. Miss Lo "Dulin and James T, Hubbard were excused by the Court. i Ros | : ® Hall {4s in the Merine Corps W, P, Taylor was excused until the November, 1953, Term of Court. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------~ AUGUST TERM, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, August 3rd, 1953 FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 3rd, 1953 Clarence Adams is in Swarmoa Hospital. ; 1842 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Cc, D. Snow is deceased. — Continued under former order. The following good and lawful men were duly drawn and sworn as the snes Lee Strange Grand Jury to serve for the six months period ending December 31, 1953, to-wt: Dp. C. Sherrill C. E. Bunday 81,3 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Ho. 184 Defendant is ordered to pay $150.00 now State and is given until next term of Court to Bill Jones pay the balance. John T. Gill H, D. Jolly Claude D. Madison Earl Nance L. M. Brown F. W. Whitlow II C. H. Goodwin Glenn Sigmon 8 DRIVING DRUNK Willard Bowers George Wilson ‘lo. 185 State Alias Capias Osborne Smith C, BE. Stewart Lawrence Lapish MT orl Ud chee ee vs Raymond Saunders Spann Ww. G. Blankenship F, M. Sloan R. D. Clodfelter Alo. 1879 John T. Gill was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR State Defendant called and failed. Judgment vs Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. J. E. Smith was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. Amos Tucker No. 1103 | FALSE PRETENSE State Continued under former order. tio, 1880 State vs v Guy Ramsey 8 George M Sm th FALSE PRETENSE Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. No. 1616 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State . Alo. 1881 FALSE PRETENSE Alias Capias State Good behavior shown. Continued under vs ‘J, D. Gray vs former order. J, C, Kennerly Peel a eal Y _————— VE No. 1644 2 - State ABANDON NON-SUPPORT Mo, 1882 BREAKING & ENTERING Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei State Defendant called and failed. Judgment = Fa and Capias. Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. Troy Fesperman 14 Wa % 4 E 7 Wie A. vs Lonnie Shuford 1 H ‘No. a660 ABANDON « NON-SUPPORT Mo. 1757 MURDER = e Defendant called and failed. Judgment State Continued. ~~ Fa and Instanter Capias. vs ‘Ho. 1763 DRUNK vs Alias Capias State DRIVING L, D. Wall Continued. vs Quy Richard Elmore 5) Sat a a No. 1734 te Ld Mi S \ State vs Willard L Dison SNo. 1828 State vs Ansel Jones \No. 18631 State vs Reath Taylor No. 1834 State vs Nelson Curlee Land DRUNK & DISORDERLY Alias Capias MALICIOUS INJURY TO PERSONAL PROPERTY Defendant called and failed. Judgment isi Se? Fa and Instanter Capias. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEA PON . D Good behavior shown. Continued under former on efendant to appear at January Term oo il BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant cal nisi Se! Fa and tetas Judgment ‘Nos. 1801 & 1802 State vs William Philo Withe rspoon Mack Leonard Rash , ‘No, 1808 State vs Louis W, McKesson, Jr. “Wos. 1 :,2°* > ion Ugene Clifford Emerson / Nos. 1840 State 40 & 1841 lem ames Gray Hemmings DRIVING DRUNK: AID & ABETT IN DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the Term. DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the Term ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON - INTENT TO KILL BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Continued for the KING, ENTERING AND LARCENY RESAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON = INTENT TO KILL Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 FIRST WEEK ~----—- AUGUST TERM 1953 Monday, August 3rd, 1954 — W-38 be confined in the common jail of Iredell County in addition to the sentence pronounced in Nos. | ie for a term of Four (i) ez and be assigned to 1851 and 1852, and, in view of the prison 4 work under the supervision of the State Highway sentence imposed in 1851, is suspended upon a = and Public Works Commission. This sentence is the following conditions: i. 7, suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant not operate a motor ii uM a 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 vehicle upon the public hivhways for three years. iP —— and the cost, 2. That he be of good behavior and that he i re. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle for not in any wise violate the motor vehicles law io Ve &@ period of Twelve (12) Months. for a peiod of three (3) Years, otherwise i Ws Yani un fon he /No. 1846 State vs Otis Horace Howie INo. 1764 State vs Richard Glenn Bowers W-42 *No. 1855 State vs Edgar Thomas Lunsford ‘No. 1856 State vs wad dom Forrest Sigmon =3 \ No. 1774 State vs L. L. (Bill) Lackey \No. 1795 State vs Camerén Harrigon (Cam) Hayes ‘Nos. 1918 & 1919 State Cline t Gai n aith John McClelland MANSLAUGHTER Continued for the Term, DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Guilty through his attomey, Baxter Finch. The judgment of the Court is tht the defendar be confined in the common pail of Iredell Count for a term of Six (6) Months and be assiged to work under the supervision of the State ighway ani Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspeniy upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 ang the cost. 2. That he not eperene a motor vehicle upon tix public highways for Eighteen (18) Months, 3. That he be of good behavior, and Particular) that he not violate the motor vehicle laws for a period of Three (3) Years, otherwise capias to isu to put the prison sentence into effect at any sub- sequent term of the court. 738 W. Sharpe Street, Statesville, N.C, LN-li)M¥ DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attomey, “ohn McLaughlin, enters a plea of Guilty. The judgment of the Court is that the defeniatt 3. That he be of good behavior and particularly that he not become intoxicated for a period of Three (3) Years, otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subse- quent term of the court. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Sixty (60) Dave and to be used at any County institution f ch period of time as his services are satisfectory” otherwise to be assigned to the roads under thesupervision the State Highway and Public Worke Commission; that he not drive a motor vehicle on the public highways for a period of Sixteen (16) Months. a MANUFACTURE OF LIQUOR ON HIS PROPERTY wen behavior shown. Continued under former MANUFACTURE LIQUOR ut behavior shown. Contimued under former ASSAULT wiTy DEADLY WEAPON « INTENT TO KILL AID & ABETT IN Ags A N True Bill. ULT WITH DEADLY WEAPO Monday, August 3rd, 1953 Hos. 1851, 1852 & 1854 State vs Carl Franklin Bynum, Jr. We26 ‘flo, 1938 State vs Carl ry peanklin Bynum, Jr. Ho, 18 Sess vg “nae es Bunard Bradshaw @4,7 flo, } $a 005 vs Charles Bunard B Wai radshaw DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY: ASSAULT ON — AND DRIVING DRUNK ” efendant enters a plea of lty in all three cases through hig eteseale, Mr, Avery. In No. 1851, Judgment of tiie bourt is that the defendant be corfined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Eighteen (18) Months and be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, In No. 1852, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jai] of Iredell County for a term of Two (2) Years and be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commig- sion. This sentence to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed in No. 1851 and to be served ge y from and in addition thereto. is suspended for Five (5) Years upon condition that the defendant be of good behavior, work regularly, particularly that he not in any wise molest or annoy or assault Mrs. Carl Bynum, otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term. In No. 1854, Judgment uf the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Six (6) Months and aspigned to work under the syervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence to be served separately from and capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the court. NON-SUPPORT The Court Sustains the findings of the lower court, orders the prison sentence of Eight (&) Months put into effect, to be served concurrently with the sentence pronounced in No. 1851, PEEPING TOM Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere, through his attorneys, McLaughlin & Battley. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of not less than Sixteen (16) not more than Twenty-Four (24/ Months and assigned to work under the supervision ofthe State Highway and Public Works Commission. It is respectfully requested that the defendant be given careful physical examination and assigned to such work as his physical condition will permit. The defermiant admits that he is sexually abnormal, and the Court therefore requests that he be given such phychiatric dxam ination and treatment as is indicated. PEEPING TOM Defendant through his atto raeree McLaughlin and Battley, enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Two (2) Years and assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, this sentence to begin at the expiration of the . sentence imposed in 1864 and to be served separate from and in addition thereto. It is suspend for Five (5) Years upon condition that the pehepia tbe, pf good behavior and not in any w IN THE SUPERIOR COURT cost of these actions, which cost shall IN THE SUPERIOR COURT F on cece UGUST TERM ry FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 — iuites meas ia, ibs} aad ha Monday, August 3rd, 1953 ' ety Vo. 1893 & 189 FLIM FLAM « LARCENY BY . 1895 & 1896 | LARCENY BY TRICK Se oa 5 A True Bil) TRICK >... Defendant through her attorney, J. G, sate ta ‘a Lewis, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere, Hi Henry Samuel Harger Juanita Maxine Young Consolidated for judgment id Juanita Maxine Young W-F-39 Judgment of the Court is tmt the defendant ERE be confined in the common jail of Iredell oe County for a term of Two (2/ Years and i “No. 1890 PROSTITUTION assigned to work in the Women's Division LL State A True Bill under the supervision of the State Highway PH , o and Public Works Commission. This sentence Ran) dain Frances Gregory is guspended upon the following conditions: ein! HE 1. That she pay a fine of $100.00 and the || tha mt Wos 1892 & 1896 FLIM FLAM = LARCENYBY TRICK include the sum of $16,00 for the use and St : benefit of Mrs. C. W, Fox, $10.00 to Mrs. = A True Bill W. H. Hartsell, and $10.06 to “rs. £. F° Henry Samuel Harger Stewart. Juanita Maxine ‘oung 2. That she beof good behavior and not in any wise violate the law for a period of five (5) Years, otherwise capias to issue vs Vlyde Junior Busge]] Wos. 1939, 1941 & 1942 BREAKIN to put the prison sentence into effect at State ’ | A G2 ENTERING & LARCENY any subsequent term of the court. = True Bill Lorenzo Moore Richard Alexander Mills | No. 1890 PROSTITUTION — Leander Frances Smith State —~ Defendant through her attorneys, Mr. Simons v8 om =. Lewis, cavers 4 fies of Peta eae? Frances Gregor ury sworn and empanelled as follows: ih “™ — LARCENY ? WePo25~ . Oscar M, Williams, Wm. A. Christie, Sam H. Pe encetara ats tRpygh he attorney, John HeLa Deas RNa CahEtND, Allen Maden, G- R: cotte, | t ° + ° ° ; y Tommie Stikeleather i Jury sworn and empanell si. Lee G. Lackey, M. G. Queen and William Brown i f i At the close of the State's evidence, defendant wens 2 ee tee oo eas. { 4 Motion atiemngeorney moves for judgment of non-suit. be confined in the common jail of Iredell : " ey Gounty for a term of Two (2) Years and i rf “No. 1928 sesigned to work under the supervision of } State LARCENY OF AUTO the Women's Division of the State Highway i A True Bil) 1 and Public Works Commission. rt ; y ' lo. 1866 | LARCENY OF AUTO Nos. 1933 & 193, RECEIY State Defendant through his attorney, W. R. ; State ING ys Battley enters a plea of Guilty to operating ua vs A True Bil] Walter D. Peacock a motor vehicle without the consent of the fi Troy Heath W~33 owner. 1 a Eli Campbell Judgment of the Court is that the defendant Tih be confined in the common ie of Iredell ne County for a term of Four (4) Months, and i 8 * Nos. 1920, 1922, 1924 & 1927 | assigned to work under the supervision of the f 4. State “ae wipe DEADLY WEAPON < INT TO KILL | State Highway and Public Works Commission. X vs rue 5ill ti Roy Daniel \ Marvin Donald Poeje st No. 1857 DRIVING DRUNK Hi Marshall Henry Fox State Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. mi Kenneth Wesley Fox j w Judgment of the Court is that the defendant | Quince Shoemaker be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell a W=40 County for aterm of Six (4) Months, and A No. 1940 oe assigied to work under the supervision of the Vt State REAKING, ENTERING 3. LARCENY State Highway and Public Works Commission. | balidies Moore True Bill This sentence is suspended upon the following | conditions: 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost. | Wigs 0% FLIM FLAM 2. That he be of good behavior, and particularls vs AT By LARCENY By TRICK that he not violate the motr vehicle laws for a Hen Samuel H oe. SARs period of three years, otherwise capias to issue to a —— put the prison sentence into effect at any subse- | quent term of the court. ‘No. 1660 3. That he not operate a moter mbtste we State ABANDON the public higways for Eighteen nths. ‘v Defendane’ 7oUPPORT New Hope, N. C, LN=410488, P, W, Byers the Court. Scharged from further compliance with he i ‘ * 3 9 Sta Compli *No. 1930 ." "Deteatens appeared and showed compliance — FORGERY Jimmie Reece w with orders of the Court, vs Jimmie Martin ° ae ws fi Z om ee ~ aa ‘ =" FIRST WEEK -----. AUGUST Vio. 1893 & 1895 State Henry Samuel Harger Juanita Maxine Young “No. 1890 State vs Frances Gregory Wos 1892 & 1896 State vs Henry Samuel Harger Juanita Maxine toung Nos. 1939, 1941 & 1942 State vs Lorenzo Moore Richard Alexander Mills Leander Frances Smith “No. 1837 State vs Tommie Stikeleather “No. 1928 State vs Vlyde Junior Bussell ‘Nos. 1933 & 193, @tate vs Troy Heath Eli Campbell St vs Roy Daniel Rumple, Jr, Marvin Donald Turner Marshall Henry Fox Kenneth Wesley Fox wna 2080, 1922, 1924 & 1927 “No. 1940 State vs Lorenzo Moore \No. 1894 State ve Henry Samuel Harger >No. 1660 State vs P, W. Byers 3No. 1930 State vs Jimmie Martin & at or ee es a PS Ramee me ts es ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TERM, 1953 Monday, August 3rd, 1953 FLIM FLAM = LARCENY BY TRICK dios. 1895 & 1896 A True Bill State 8 juanite Maxine Young w-F-39 PROSTITUTION A True Bill FLIM FLAM - LARCENYBY TRICK A True Bill BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill Ng. 1890 tate vs Frances Gregory LARCENY WeF=25 efendant through enters a pleace Nee eer, John McLaughlin, Jury sworn and empanell ed. chronge es one of the State's evidence, defendant Motios aliowae re? moves for judgment of non-suit, LARCENY OF AUTO A True Bill me 1866 tate RECEIVING vs A True B4i}} Walter D. Peacock W=33 ASSA ! A Trae tpH DEADLY WEAPON - INT TO KILL ‘Wo. 1857 State * Quince Shoemaker BREAKING, ENTER I Tru BrreRING & LARCENY FLIM FLAM . A True Bul) eXY BY TRICK ABANDON & N ON~SUPpo Defendant RT the Court, discharged from further compliance with e 0. 1369 State FORGERY avs i A True Bi) mute Reece Wooten FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, August 3rd, 1953 LARCENY BY TRICK Defendant through her attorney, J. G, Lewis, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. Consolidated for judgment Judgment of the Court is tht the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Two (2/ Years and assigned to work in the Women's Division uAder the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That she pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of these actions, which cost shall include the sum of $16,00 for the use and benefit of Mrs. C. W, Fox, $10.00 to Mrs. W. H. Hartsell, and $10.06 to “irs. E. F. Stewart. 2. That she beof good behavior and not in any wise violate the law for a period of five (5) Years, otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the court. PROSTITUTION — ~~~ Defendant through her attorneys, Mr. Simons and Mr. Lewis, enters a pies of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Oscar M, Williams, Wm. A. Christie, Sam H. Deaton, R. W. Gabriel, Allen McGee, G. R. Goble, Clifton Shumake, H. L. Moore, Paige Beatty, Lee G. Lackey, M. G. Queen and William Brow Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as chaged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell Gounty for a term of Two (2) Years and assigned to work under the supervision of the Women's Division of the State Highway | and Public Works Commission. LARCENY OF AUTO Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley enters a plea of Guilty to operating a motor vehicle without the consent of the owner. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common i of Iredell County for a term of Four (4) Months, and assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. —— NT ES ne DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for aterm of Six (4) Months, and assimed to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost. | 2. That he be of good behavior, and particularl that he not violate the motr vehicle laws for a period of three years, otherwise capias to issue to} put the prison sentence into effect at any subse- quent term of the court. 3. That he not operate a motor vehicle upon the public higways for Eighteen (18) Months. New Hope, N.C. LN=410488. Compliance Defentant appeared and showed compliance with orders of the Court. RT INTHE SUPERIOR COURT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURERM, 1953 www a FIRST WEEK Sener , — saaiias ours pe a" 4 Monday, August 3rd, 1953 , ‘ q Ss 5 1 Cone Yee Mos (GD US TS REO: Tee) “No. 1371 COMPLIANCE - CASH BOND — icttettiin oftne Seure. — Will Pless, Jr., Judge presiding, and a jury of twelve men, at the vs . Garris Calloway Waddell This action coming on to be heard, and being heard, before Hon. J. August Term 1953, Iredell Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that ug ’ ‘No. 1376 COMPLIANCE = CASH BOND jefendant ha State Continued until January, 1954, Term of Superior Court ummons has peen duly and peperly had on the defendant personally, amd that 7 8 s been served personally with summons, and that service of vs + a So he parties are properly before the Court, and the following Issues having the pa “No. 1377 COMPLIANCE + CASH BOND State Defendant appeared and showed compliance vs with orders of the Court 1, Were the plaintiff and the deferd ant married to each other as o a 2 Ralph Edward Farrell alleged in the complaint: been submitted to the Jury ‘= fendant lived separate and apart from 2, Have the plaintiff and the & ; t preceding the commencement of this ee. SS Sr COMPLIANCE - CASH BOND each other for a period of two years nex pre g State t? It appearing to the Court that the defendant action, #5 alleged in the complain vs is now present in Court and states that he has Norman Taylor Hoover fully complied with the udgment heretofore entered in this matter, it is, therefore, ordered I A eae = 2s £ aintiff been & resident of the State of North Carolina for six Bag preceding the commencement of this action, 4s alleged that the cash bond deposited with the Clerk of in the complaint? ; a this Court be turned over to the defendant a8 having answered all the Issues : directed in the original judgment. And the jury having Ps a NOW, THEREFORE, ON MOTION of Z. A. Morris, Jr., Attorney for the aia inl DIVORCE Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: plaintiff, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed a Pearl Carriker Vochran Oscar M. Williams, Fred Jolly, William A. Christie, vs - W. L. Hines, Sam i. Deaton W. Gabriel, Allen matrimony heretofore existing between the above named plaintiff and the Ralph Cochran McGee, G. R. Goble, E. 0. éloaninger, Clifton Shumake, H. L. Moore and Paige Beatty. =a above named defendant be, and they are hereby, dissolved, and that the NORTH CAROLINA, Vv from the NTY ° lai tiff b and she is hereby, awarded an absolute divorce Mc J defend t Pearl Carriker Cochran e an Plaintiff, AA This the 3 day of August, 1953. -VSe~ yi { J. Will Pless, Jr. PRL Ralph Cochran, PRES ID agers FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Defendant. ake eee Re HES to oil a 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant married to each other, as alleged ho. 1862 in the complaint? State vs NON-SUPPQT | Elvy D0 “ieman j ANSWER _Yes j Continued under former order. ad £ f — ms 1873 e ach _ DRIVING . RUNK Ze | Alias Capias Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from = fobert S Brigman other for a period of two years next preceding the commencemen t of this action ™ alleged in the complaint? Mo. 1415 State ANSWER _ Yes vs j FORGERY i Clifford Charles Hall | Continued under former or der. e 3 as the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for Six month ant s next preceding the commencement of this action, 48 alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes _, NORTH CAROLINA, Thie H day Morning August 4, 1953, IN T T. onorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday ; at 9:30 o'clock A. M. Pearl Carriker Cochran, Plaintiff, ~V8< Ralph Cochran, ee Defendant a a JUDGMENT FOR THE PLAINTIFF: ; " L ' i i: ; > > a) Sa 4 SS = ot cha a : Lie eet eed mh a a w~ ——— ; me) eG OI ESR = = = See's nad IN THE SUPERIOR COURT z IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 r FIRST WEEK ----~ AUGUST TERM, 193 Tuesday, Avwust 4th, 193 : Tuesday, This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, August 4th, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. J No. 1897 DRUNK & DISORDERLY State The defendant through his counsel, Mr. Battle vs waives finding of a bill in 1897-A. Upon the Lester W. Lytton defendant's plea of guilty of illegally transport- W-35 ing im oxicating liquors, judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Six (6) Months ani be assigned to work under the supevision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for three years upon condition that the defendant not exhibit himself in an intoxicated condition in a public place nor be convicted of saidoffense, otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subseauent term of the court; the defendant to pay the cost. No. 1886 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT State Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, oan necceans enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. ¥ a. ampbe es ene of the Court is that the defendant - be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Two (2) Years and be assigned to work on the roads under the supevision of the State Hichway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay into the office of the Clerk Superior Courtaf Iredell County $12.00 each week for the support and maintenance of Maris Ann Campbell, same to be paid out upon the receipt Of Mrs. Theresa Campbell, the first pa ment to be made on or before Saturday August 8, 1 53+ 2. That he pay into the office of the Clerk aj additional sum required for the necessary medical treatment of said child, said sums to be paid within 30 days from the date of said bill by 7 doctor, drug stor certified correct to Ehe Clerk. hospital, or te ee Sal miner 3. That the defendant not depart the confined of “Wo. 1943 State of N.C, without leave of the Court first hand State been obtained and after giving notice of his inten? vs to leave to said Thresa Campbell. , John Pinky Smith Upon failure of the defendant to fulfill each & all of the foregoing conditions, capias to igsue 6° put the prison sentence into effect without _ order of the court. Nos. 1908 & 19 > 1907 DRIVING DRUNK: RECKLESS DRIVING vs In 1908 the defendant tendere & plea of Guilty Frank Junior Clark of Driving Drunk through his attorney, W- R, Batter _ ¢ dudgnent of the Court is that the defe “_~ ined in the Common Jail of Iredell County on oe of Eight (8) Months, and be assigned to * Publi the supervision of the State Highway and -— Works Sommission. n 1907, defendant through his attormey, — enters a plea of Guilty to Reckles conftaia ts of the Court is that the defendant b . corm. in the common jail of Iredell County fo under the Three (3) Months, and assigned t° work Works © e supervision of the State Highway and expir nh a yee This sentence to begin at the be aerven of the sentence imposed in 190 and i separately from and in add 8 8 that the delende for five (5) Years upon °° dant not nicle upoe t o r ve caterae highways sisthe' thee tine, and that " Teaue to” - Fes behavior, otherwise cepiss © Subsequent term, "wence into effect at any August 4th, 1953 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. ce of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Two (2) Years and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Thi nt i oh Rp s suspended upon the following 1. The defendant shall pay into the office f the Clerk Superior Court ef Iredell Courty 12.00 each week for the support and maintenance of Chucky Eugene Houston, said amount to be paid out upon the receipt of Mrs. Bettie Jean ouston, the first payment to be made on or before Monday, August 10, 1953, and a like amount each Momday thereafter. 2. Such allotment as may be paid to Mrs. Houston shall be expended upon the payment of unpaid hospital and medical bills he retofore contracted at the time of the birth of the child apd for treatment of the child since then. n the event any surpius remains after the — of these odligetions. defendant shal ave credit for sai surplus. This judgment contemplates the revocation of the judgment imposed in an action against the defendant in Catawba County, and is not intended to increase the amoun required under the judgment of that court except for the difference of two dollars per week. This cause is retained for increasing or de- creasing the amount required to be paid by the defendant in the event the conditions of the parties shall materially change. It is ordered that @ copy of this judgment be certified to the Superior Court of Catavba County, with the respectful request that the judgment there be revoked in order that the present judgment may compld@ely supersede it, and this request being made in the interest and at the request ef Mrs. Bettie Jean Houston who is a resident of Iredell County. FIRST DEGREE BURGLARY The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body (Seventeen present) a true bill of Indictment charging the defendant, John Pi Smith, with the capital offense of Burglary in words and figures as follows: "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT Iredell County. August 3, Term, 1953+ FF THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: I That John P. Smith late of the County of Iredell on the 16th day of May A. D. 3953, about the hour of twelve in the night of the same day, with force and arms, at and in the county aforesaid, the dwelling house of one Marsha}i Knox there situate, andthen and there actually occupied by one Marshall Knox, feloniously and burglariously did break and enter, with intent, the goods and chattels of the said Marshall Knox, in the said dwelling house then and there being, then and there feloniously and burgleriously to steal, take and carry, awa contrary to the form of the statute in such tase made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State. Zeb A. Morri i citor. No. 1943 State vs John P, Smi BURGLARY Saliy Knox x e Mal. ver Knox x, RE Perki rarpstied fe SL Bist aaa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----=- AUGUST TERM T EK «<<-=-- AUGUST TERM — Seba; August 4th, 19$3 » 1953 on rh T F uesday, August hth, 1953 q | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY il | ' No. 1910 RECEIVING Hi F hi State Nol Pros With Leave. , Nol Pros With Leave. | Ait vs i if Lorenzo Moore vs h i Ve \ Troy Heat : + | eae a 398 “ER. mi) i) “4 ate a plea o ° I. NF o- to Forcible Trespass through his attomey, State vel hinnealiianealieeaniied uy Se | iy Lorenzo Moore McLaughlin & Battley. vs ea ae ad C-25 Judgment of the boure is that the defenia Eli Campbell i ti be confined in the common jail of Irede}} it {: County for a term of not less than ASSAULT | E if nor more than Eighteen (18) Ronthe, wnt (12) “lo. a ol Pros With Leave. | assigned to work on the roads under the ° nae her , vision of the State Highway and Public Werke vs hat ij Commission. (#~ po /1/ Joe Benson j . State fend i JNo. 1941 | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Joey ea ag Se PETE od! Noh Gyilty. | i State i Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Joe Benson R. W. Gabriel, Mrs. Harold Wilson, M G Queen " vs Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Ss William Brown, L. B. Holleman, R.’L. Mullis,’ ‘, l Richard Alexander Mills Oscar M, Williams, Fred Jolly, William A. E. Price Furr, F. N, Beaver, John S, Raynal ‘| ibs | C-34, ee _ He Eines, a —— Allen — ep te pp pepe Ber Roby Davis. ) | ° - O. Cloaninger ury returned a Clifeén Shumake, A? Reese" Paige Beatty ari in 4 dco — = — oa | Lee G, Lackey. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant ti Jury returmed a verdict of Guilty as chargei be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County Te in the Bill of Indictment. for a term of Two (2) Years and assigned to Judgment of the Court on the count chargin work under the supervision of the State Highway lar ceny is that gh 4 fondant be gonf ined in and Public Works Commission. The Court respect - the common fil o frede ounty for a tern of fully recommends that the defendant be given ti | not less than (16) Sixteen nor more than (24) a careful mental and physical examination and such if i THEO RMpEPHT oH ORY BP APAobR ES ERE A nie, Ve Vert treatment as is indicated. #19 if n count char rea entering 4 Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be a confined in the State Prison at hard labor for No. 1930 FORGERY + not less than Five (5) nor more than Seven (7) State A True Bill : ‘y Years, this sentence to begin at the expiration v8 | h 1 of the sentence imposed charging larceny, ani Jimmie Martin is suspended for Five (5) Years upon condition the defendant be of good behavior and not in h any wise violate the law, otherwise capias ® 98. 1909 & 1910 RESIST ARREST & DRIVING DRUNK issue to put the prison sentence into effect Defendant enters a plea of Guilty in both cases. at any subsequent term. Denpee C Judgment of the Court in 1909, is that the =a rouch defendant be confined in rs common jail of Iredell *No. 1942 County for a term of Six (6 Months, and assigned State are ENTERING & LARCENY 11 to work under the supervision of the State Highway i fendant enters a plea of Not Gu i and Public Works Commission. Leander Frances Smith Coane tt ompane}led ao Soliomi In 1910, Judgment of the Court is that the defencant - Christie, W. Le i nes, Sam H”’ Deaton, athe Meee teen ed eet oe Beal att rt ee G. R. Goble, E. 0. Cloeningss | toe work under the supervision of the State Highway ~~ H. L. Moore, Paige Beatty an md Public Works Commission, this sentence to begin ys y. rey as exert at the expiration of the sentence imoosed in 1905 in the Bily ened 9, verdict of Guilty and is to be served separately from and in addition Judenens of pe C won "on the count, charg thereto. In viewof the prison sentence imposed in larceny, is that th “ fandant be confined 0. 1909, the service of the sentence in 1910 is ’ e derendan ert 0 suspended for five (5) Years upon the following the common jail of Iredell County for at aty conditions: , Foy less than Sixteen (16) ot ee then a 1. That the defendant not operate a motor vehicle Bis EAL otioR EME nn SRE a PE HED EE afc: tet upon the public highways for Five (5) Years, this dudament oF tke ; a os cor oo defendant b¢ being his second offence for drunken driving. contined in the Shake aoe at hard Labor {0 | 2. That he be of good behavior and not in any less than Five (5) nor more than Seven (7) '# wise violate the law, otherwise capias to issue to this sentence to be in at the «piration of t put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent sentence imposed cher ing larceny, and 18 term. suspended for Pay he eon dition * defendant be of Zo pore any behavior and not in Char) i Ervin McClelland Apt. 14, Federal Housing, Hickory, N.C. 1 wise violate to it No. 199 the law, otherwise capias St 2 to put the pri " ffect at a" ate POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR subsequent cin sentence into e vs Defendant enters a plea of Hot Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Oscar M Williams, Fred Jolly, William A. Christie, ole H . ‘ All Hecke, Aree, gerie: Beef or ee oie hilton - Shumake, H, L, Moore and Paige Beatty. Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT o-- eeee GUST TERM, 1953 FIRST weReadsy, ‘saniet 4th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Tuesday, August 4th, 1953 N-TAX PAID LIQUOR (Grand Jury Report continued) — edie oe a er - ~ Guilty, County Court House Charles Ervin McClelland | R. We Gabriel, a. Queen, Willian rete; | Court House rooms are found to be in good condition, except for Ce. r: n Beaver, Prank tiaras Teor? seeyfu™ the P. Me A. Office which needs walls repaired and water proofed. Lee Bennett, R. S. Vison and John S. Ra team pipes. Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty, We also recommend covering s p All records were found to be in order and all employees are : FIRST DEGREE BURGLARLY a Befendant enters a plea of Guilty to commended on their good work and cairtesy vs | Housebreaking which plea the State accepts, (rue: ste Chaat? Albee te tte sa. J Pinky Smith Judgment of the Court is that the defendant We also fin ‘was i ? co snes Sn the =" ey Soe —s We also appointed a committee to visit the County Schools between | of not less than Seven (7 nor more t en Superior Court. (10) Years. this date amd the November Term of Sup John T, Gill Foreman PERMITTING HOUSE TO BE USED FOR PROSTITUTION D t th h his attorne McLaughlin & Battlen enters plea of Rot Gailty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: R, W. Gabriel, M. G, Queen, William Brown, B. Holleman, R. L, Mullis, E. Price Furr, (No. 1932 State vs Watson Stutts ee ee mR eee ee a e~ k: F. N. Beaver. Frank Hillard, T. G. Bowles The following were sworn as talesmen jurors for the wee . « be ’ ? * . ’ ; » Ve B tt and R. S. Digon, R. S. Dison . Pg es yh ates of Guilty as charged T, G. Bowles W. V. Barrow Lee Bennett in t Warrant, “GRAND JURY REPORT AUGUST TERM, 1953 t . hi 5 > a. 7ta The Grand Jury found True Bills of Indictment on all cases that were passed on that were presented by the Solicitor, oe Committees were appointed to inspect the following County Properties: County Jail Sat he a At the Jail we found the women, 12 white following prisonass: 1 white woman, 2 colored men & 5 colored men, We found the Jail in good repair and kept 10 excellent condition » except the hall floors which need to be painted. County Home We found the County Home to be in A-] Condition, We found 16 white men, 15 white women, 1, Colored men & 4 colored women, making a totel of 39. Prisoners: 3 white men, 3 Colored men, 2 colored women making a toml of 8 prisoners, We found the mt we recommend a 3 Compartment sink in the kitchen, » Painting eel] black that has not been painted, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, Ay Gust Sth, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A, M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «----- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, August 5th, 1953 at 9:30 o'clock A. M. Boyd Sprinkle was sworn 48 talesman juror for the week. No. 1887 State Lah White | | | | State v8 Robert Garfield Lawrence, Jr W-23 ‘No. 1899 State vs George Harris LNo. 1911 State vs Glenn Junior Barlow ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant through his attorneys, McLaughlin & Battley, entere a plea ef Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled. During the trial the defendant withd Ree of not guilty and enters a plea eae ontendere. The tons of the Court is that the defendant t confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Two (2) Years and be assigned to work on the public highways under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay the cost of this action, which shall include the sum of $250.00 for the use and benefit of James Lasenby, said amount to be pa s follows: 14 8806 on or before the lOth day of October, 1953; $50.00 on or before the 10th day of November, 1953; tai on or before the 10th of each calendar month thereale until the total amount is fully paid. Upon the failure of the defendant to make each paye as above required, capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect without further order of the cout, 2. That the defendant be of good behavior and particularly that he not carry any weapon of any natut upon the public street or road, and that he = the eee toward all persons, for a period of five \5) ears, otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the court. DRIVING DRUNK eferniant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Gujlty. Judgemeht of the bske is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Four (4) Months and assigned to wor k wanee the supervision of the State Highway and Publit Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upo ™ conditions: 00 . at the defend f $100. at tae Uk Ce endant pay 4 fine © 3 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle oD nak highways for a period of Twelve {12) - That he be of iod good behavior for 4 per of Three (3) Years and that he not in any wise oth ate the motor vehicle laws during that times ig erwise capias to issue to put the prison sem en into effect at any subsequent term of the court. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant called Nisei Sei Fa and Lome tale Judgment DRIVING DRUNK Continued, FIRST /Nos. 1913 & 1914 State v Ruth Dula Fox, alias Ruth Payne Fox, alias Mrs. Coy Lester Fox ‘No, 1878 State vs SLlmer Sherrill ‘Yo. 1 Staten’ ve John T Click IN THE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 POSSESS FOR SALE NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant through her attorney, John McLaughlin, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: R. We Gabriel, M. G. Queen, William Brown, L. B. Holleman, R. L. Mullis, E. Price Furr, F._N. Beaver, Frank Hillard, T. G. Bowles, Lee Bennett, R. 3. Dison and John S Raynal. Jury returned 4 verdict of Guilty as charged. Judgeent of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of not less than Twelve (12) nor more than Eighteen (18) Months and assigned to work under the supervision of the Women's Division of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a term of Five (5) Years on the condition that the defendant pay a fine of $150.00 and the costs of this action and that the defendant not in any wise violate the prohibition laws. Defendant is required to appear at any subsequent term of the court after notice and show to the satisfaction of the presiding Judge that she has fulfilled this condition, otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the court. (ate P~ae ss) gD OEE BNSE DRIVING DRUNK: DRIVING AFTER LICENSE The defendant enters a plea of guilty in both cases. n No. 1913, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for Eight (8) Months and assiged to work under the super vision of the Women's Division of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. It is respectfully requested that the deferdant be given a mental examination and such treatment as is indicated, particularly for alcoholism. In No. 1914, it is the udgment of the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for Twelve (12) Months am assiged to work under the supervision of the Women's Division of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, this sentence to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed in 1913 and is to be served separately from and in addition thereto. It is suspended for Five (5) Years upon condition that the defendant not operate @ motor vehicle upon the public highways for Five (5) Years, and that she be of good behavior, otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent tefm of the court. POSSESS FOR SALE Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty, through his attorneys McLaughlin & Battley. Jury sworn and empanelled. The Court in its discretion.withdraws & juror and and erters a mistrial. (#/f / 7 eo POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Continued. ti 4 + ' —— YNo. 1916 State vs William Hopkins ‘No. 1918 State vs Clement Gaither "No. 1919 State vs John McClelland Cu 29 ‘Nos. 1892, 1893 & 18 Sette vs Henry Samuel Harger W=52 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT : _AaST WEEK o-.-.. AUGUST TERM 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 —— se DEADLY ao efendant enters a plea of Guilty to With a Deadly Weapon . Y to Assault Judgment of the Court is that th be confined in the common jail of Tredel! Catt, for a term of Six (6) Months, and work on the roads under the supertisieg st ee State Highway and Public Works Commisdon, This sentence is suspended on the follow ¢ . 1. That the defendant pay She cout fe action which shall include the sum of $20, the use and benefit of Sarah Sharfocs.* oe 2. Th,t he remain of good behavior and particularly that he not assault or attack the prosecuting witness for a period of Two (2) Years, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ~- INTENT TO KILL Defendant enters a plea of Guilty, Prayer for judgment continued until the November Term of Superior Court. AID & ABETT IN ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled. Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. LARCENY BY TRICK Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. = betel Judgment of the Court is that the efen fredett Botte Rimes, in, the Foam) t33,8 and assigned to work under the supervision of the State 1agy and Public Works Commission. In 1893, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Two (2) Years and assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, this Sentence to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed in 1892 and to be served separate from and in addition thereto. d In #1894, Judgment of the Court is that the efendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Two (2) Years and assigned to work under the supervision of the — ot and Public Works Commission, this ence to begin at the expiration of the coe ae imposed in #1893 oe be served separate and in additi ence a Suspended for a peste EP Five 5) Years on Viole oedition that the defendant not in any wise . = the law, otherwise capias to issue to Pp © prison sentence into effect at any Subsequent term of the court. io. 1815 State vs Mrs. Dorothy May Southers No. 1816 State ww Howard Monroe Southers “No. 1939 State vs Lorenzo Moore No. 1932 State vs Neteon Stutts fo. 190 State , a" rank Junior Clark IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 NON-COMPLIANCE ( ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT) It appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that the defendant has violated the cmditions upon which the rison sentence was suspended at the January erm, 1953, as set forth in the judgment in nute Docket 30, page 409, in that the ourt finds as a fact that she has frequented places where beer is sold and has generally loitered on the streets of the City of Statesville: It is now ordered that the prison sentence be amthe same is hereby put into effect and the Clerk issue commitment forthwith. NON-COMPLIANCE (ABANDON ° NON-SUPPORT) It appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that the defendant has violated the conditions under which the prison sentence was suspended at the January Term, 1953, as set forth in Minute Docket 30, page 408, in that he has made no payment whatever towards the support of his minor children as required, the Court finding that said failure was wilful, it is ordered that the prison sentence be and the same is hereby put into effect and that commitment issue forthwith, FORCIBLE , TRESPASS Judgment heretofore entered is hereby stricken out and the following judgment entered in lieu thereof: Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of not less than Twelve (12) nor more than Eighteen (18) Months and assigned to work at any County Institution for such period as his services are satisfactory, otherwise to be served under the supertision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. PERMITTING HOUSE TO BE USED FOR PROSTITUTION Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be corfined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Two (2) Years and assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Com- mission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $300.0 and the cost. 2. That he be of good behavior for a period of Five (5) Years; that he appear at each August and January Terms of this Court and show to the satisfaction of the presiding Judge that he has permitted no improper conduct on any permises under his control, and that the same have not been frequented by men or women of bad reputation. Upon the failure of the defendant to appear and make such showing as required, Capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the Court. FAIL TO STOP FOR SIREN Nol Pros With Leave. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK -----~ AUGUST TERM, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 vs FA ON BOND Mo. 1906 | SPEEDING t of the Court is that—the i Fa 19 State | Nol Pros With Leave. an be m a ear red vl vs j pon payment o the cost of Fa. Whi Frank Junior Clark | Principet 2 Nd 11 State Fon . Surety uit [No. 1937 } RECKLESS DRIING tha ; State Nol Pros With Leave. ‘ / - ‘sett L. Williams | et ent of the Cou is that_the Sci ! ve OX ~pondsman bet e absolute tobe vif L. pWat charged on payment of the cost of-Sci | (No. 3912 | DRIVING DRUNK / Pri retpel Fa. | State | Continued. Géper strickl | vs | Surety # William Floyd Reavis | ' L lo. 1856 SCI FA ON BOND : ~ 1915 DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED State Sci Fa discharged on payment of the vost. ' tate Continued. vs vs | William Forrest Sigmon | | Robert Preston Weather man i Principal | J. B. Shaver Surety ‘Nos. 1921 & 1922 } ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON — Continued until November Term of Court. Mo. 1858 | scl FA ON BOND oO. P Marvin Donald Turner i State Continued | vs Raymon Saunders Spann | » Bi “ie 1920 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ; Principal a tate I Continued until November Term of Court. Mrs C. L. Johnson ant e vs ] Surety ‘ Roy Daniel Rumple, dr j ti No. 1873 SCI FA ON BOND Maid oe Sere & 1924 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State Continued. } viata i Continued.until November Term of Court. aie i H | : _vs ‘ j Robert S. Brigman Marshall Henry Fox j i Principal | azel Beaver Surety ais Soe 1926 & 1927 | RESIST ARREST: ASSAULT ON FEMALE & ASSAULT = | “ee eee No. 160% SCI FA ON BOND ont e ‘ U ntinued until November Term of Court State It is ordered by the Court that judgment absolute be and same ic hereby entered on gainst Joseph Fulton Kenneth Wesley Fox ‘No. 1928 Joseph Fulton Woods bond in this action a State {| LARCENY OF AUTO Principal Woods, Principal and All State Bonding CO-, vs Continued. ; pode —— Co.& Surety, fr the sum of $500.00 and cost of on Clyde Junior Bussell | jpurety Sci Fa. Ao 172 sad ‘No. 192 ° 4 SCI FA ON BOND a. ee , | LARCENY OF AUTO State It is ordered by the Court that judgment vs i Continued, L ” ' absolute be and same is hereby entered on William Glenn Gilleland * "Pp Wall bond in this action against L. D. Wall, . C rincipal Principal and Caper Strickland, Surety, for Wt -— Strickland | the sum of $300.00 and cost of Sci Fa. | ‘No. 1930 i ore 1 State | FORGERY vs i Continued. 4 1863 PAIL TO KEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Jimmie Martin _" Cont inued. Stamey Head »No. 1931 . State EMBEZZLEMENT ‘No. 1898 DRUNK ‘ vs . Continued. State Continued. » R, Cashion, Jr, | 7. + frank E, Pierce | A Rae POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR vs Continued. Lewis B Bailey ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON No, 1917 Continued. State vs Edger W Linney IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 No. 4659 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. August Term 1953 Martha Morrison Speaks, Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDERS H. D. Speaks, Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard by consent, and being heard by His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge presiding at the August 1953 Term of Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the Court finds from the verified complaint and other papers in this Cause, and the statement of counsel for the plaintiff, and the defendant: -l- That the plaintiff is represented by Woodhouse and Ward, Attorneys at Law and Attorneys of record in this Cause, and R. A, Hedrick, Attorney at Law, and that the defendant is represented by C. B, Winberry, Attorney at Law, and C, B, Winberry, Attorney in Fact under a Power of Attorney from the defendant. o2e That on June 11, 1948, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a Separation agreement which is recorded in Book 202, page 366, Iredell County Registry, and pursuant thereto the defendant executed a deed to the plaintiff for a house and lot on the East side of Buena Vista Avenue, which deed is is : ecorded in Deed Book 202, page 374, Iredell County Registry, and that further ursua isi pursuant to the provisions in said Separation agreement contained the plaintiff executed an ote and deed of trust to the defendant for One Thousand Seven ¥1, 750.00), Iredell County Registry, conveying Hundred Fifty pD l y Yollars ( waich is recorded in Book 151, page 187, the house and lot on the East side of described in the aforesaid deed, That this action was instituted by Buena Vista Avenue, the plaintiff on the 30th day of March, 1949, in which the plaintirer SOught a di vorce from bed and board, alimony and counsel fees » and maintenance for the su marriare union IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 That on May 30, 1949, an order was entered in this action by His Honor George A. Shuford, Judge Presiding at the May Term 1949 Iredell County Superior Court, allowing the plaintiff alimony pendente lite and counsel fees; that nothing has ever been paid or collected under said order for alimony or for counsel fees. o-6= That nothing has been paid on the note and deed of trust executed by the plaintiff to the defendant as hereinabove referred to. a That since June 11, 1948, the plaintiff has been, and is now in the possession of the real estate described in the deed hereinbefore referred to, free and clear of the control of the defendant, -8— ‘hat on “arch 10, 1952, in another action instituted for that purpose by Martha Morrison Speaks, plaintiff, vs. H. D. Speaks, in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, the plaintiff, on March 10, 1952, obtained an absolute divorce from the defendant on the ground of two years separation. =Se That thefefendant, H. D. Speaks, makes an ap -earance in this action by C, B, Winberry, his Attorney, and C. B. Winberry, Attorney in Fact, for the purpose of consenting to this judgment and order and for no other purpose, 10 That one Child, whose name is Alvin Dewey Speaks, was born during the marriage union between the plaintiff and defendant, to-wit, on April 22, 1948, and that said child is now, and has been at all times since the Separation agreement in the custody, care and control of the plaintiff, and under a written agreement dated June 11, 1948, and executed by the Plaintiff and defendant, is being supported by the plaintiff. elle That the plaintiff and defendant have agreed upon a full and c omplete Settlement of all matters and things arising on the complaint herein, and in all matters ani things arising between the plaintiff and defendant on “ccount of the marital relations, the separation, the child born during ‘he marriage union, and the separation agreement, the deed, and the note and deed of trust hereinabove referred to, all as contained in and set forth hereinafter in the orders and decrees following these findings of fact, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- - AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 IT IS, THEREFORE, by and with the consent of the plaintiff anq the defendant, and their respective counsel, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED; 1. ‘That the order entered in this cause by His Honor George A, Shuford, Judge presiding on the 30th day of May, 1949, at the May Term 1949 Iredell County Superior Court, and recorded in Minute Docket No, 28, page 441, in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, be, and the same is hereby set aside, declared null and void, and of no force and effect whatsoever. 2. That the separation agreement executed by H. D. Speaks and Martha Morrison Speaks, dated June 11, 1948, and recorded in Deed Book 202, page 366, Iredell County Registry, be, and the same is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved, and the same is in all respects declared to be and is a legal, valid and binding contract and agreement of the plaintiff and defendant, and the same is declared to be legal and valid. 3. That thefeed executed by H. D. Speaks to Martha Morrison Speaks, dated June 11, 1948, and recorded in Deed Book 202, page 374, Iredell County Registry, be, and the same is hereby in all respects declared valid, 4. That the note in the sum of One Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,750.00), dated June 11, 1948, executed by Martha Morrison Speaks toH. D, Speaks, and the deed of trust executed by Marthe Morrison Speaks to C. B, Winberry, Trustee for H. D. Speaks, dated June 11, 1948, securing the aforesaid note and recorded in Mortgage Book 151, page 187, Iredell County Registry, and on which there is now due and unpaid One Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,750.00), be, and the same are hereby declared valid andthe legal and valid obligation of Martha Morrison “peaks, and a valid lien upon the land therein described. 9+ That upon payment of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00) by the plaintiff to the defendant, the defendant is ordered to mark the aforesaid note and deed of trust paid in full, and to have the same cancelled on the records in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina, and deliver the same to the plaintiff 6. Th at the defendant shall not be liable now or hereafter for any alimony, maintenance and Support of any kind whatsoever for the plaintiff, and is not liable for the payment of any ali mony or counsel fees under the order of His Honor George A, Shuford, Judge Iredell County Superior Court, and hereinabo 7 presiding at the May Term 1949 th ve referred to. at the ssiadial Plaintiff is hereby given full and complete control, caré “—— "wees OF the | e minor child, Alvin Dewey Speaks, born during the marriage union between the Plaintiff and defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 5th, 1953 8g, That the plaintiff, Martha Morrison Speaks, shall be liable for the maintenance and support ofthe minor child, Alvin Dewey Speaks, born during the marriage union between the plaintiff and defendant, and the agreement widch the plaintiff and defendant executed on June 11, 1948, in regard to the custody and support of the aforesaid minor child, and of which agreement each of the parties hereto has in their possession an executed original, is declared and decreed to be valid, and the valid, legal and binding obligation of the parties there- tO~ 9. That the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County shall enter upon the original of the order entered in this cause by His Honor George A. Shuford, Judge presiding on May 30, 1949, a notation signed by said Clerk that the same has been set aside and declared null and void by this order, and shall also make the same entry upon the Minute Docket where saidorder is recorded. 10. That the plaintiffpay the cost of this action. ll. This Judgment entered and sirned by and with the consent ¢ the parties hereto, and their respective counsel, as a final judgment and order in this cause, on this the 5th day of August, 1953. J. Will Pleas, dr. Judge Presiding Consented to: Martha Morrison Speaks Martha Morrison Speaks, Plaintil?r WOODHOUSE AND WARD BY:_ William I. Ward Jr. Attorneys d record br the Plaintiff RK. A, Hedrick Kt, A, Hedrick Att f Pisin 47 ; orney for the H. D. SPEAKS, DEFENDANT BY: C. B * Je Winberry Attorney in Fact for Hy D. Speaks, Defendant C, By Winberry Attorney for fi. DU, Speaks, Defendant See = & Ss aS This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, August 10, » 4t 10:00 O'clock A, M, US 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND wLEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT IREDSLL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, August 10th, 1953 at 10:00 o'clock A. “., with Honorable J, Wi} Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding and holding Courts of this Fifteenth Judicial District, Fall Term, 1952, present and presiding. J. C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the second week of the August Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: Mrs. Garnell Thomas Mrs. R. L. McKee Weston Nola Franklin Miller James E, McKnight Overcash UC. J. McKenzie Hardin Taylor G. B, Morrow C. M. Neal Tucker o DP BP F&F A L, E. - E. Boan H. Ban E. Harris C. Bill Harris R. H. Westmoreland Payne Virgil Harris Thomas H. McKinnis H. W. Warren J. C. Weber C. L. Duckworth Miss Mary Litaker Don R, Hagler W, C, Lackey L. T. Freeze W. C. Moore M, L. Gant sharlie Menscer N. D. Blackwelder James Ellis Hollar Lester Hayes C. R. Munday W. E, Fulbright, dr. Roy Warren Bryant W. Warren G, M. Pierce Nola Franklin Mill of the County. Fy Me» Ts Pesegs » ©. M, Neal, and Virgil Harris live out C. J. McKenzie. H certificates,’ ardin Taylor and R. H, Tucker were excused by doctor's Bill Harris and W. C, Moore were not returned, Mrs. R. L. McKee Was excused by death, Thomas H, C, L, Duckworth Ww. he pay a fine of $20.00." and failed to enewer. hat It is ordered by the Court ¢ The following men and wome ne be termed the Divorce Onstitute what shall hereafter Harris, H, W Mrs. Garnell Thomas, G, B. Morrow, Ben 5 Menscer, Lester Hayes, Roy Warren, - W €stmoreland, Don R, Hapler and C, R, Munday. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August l0th, 1953 | DIVORCE Ao. 5563 | The ae ueree Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it Helen Howard Justice | as follows: vs | Forrest Odell Justice NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY August Term, 1953 Helen Howard Justice b ° l ISSUES Forrest Odell Justice | I Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes II Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Anewer: Yes III Have tne plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer; Yes North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell] County August Term, 1953 Helen Howard Justice Plaintiff vs Judgment Forrest Odell Justice ! ! ! Defendant | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His K enor, J, Will Pless, Judge Presiding and a jury at the August Term, 1953, of the Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that d *fendant has been personally served with process, and the following issues havi ng been submitted to and answered by the jury: i Ge theplaintiff and defendant lawfully married as Alleged in the Complaint? Answer: "Yegn 2. North Carolina Action? Has the plaintiff been a hona fide resident of the State of for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this Answer: "Yegn IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----* UGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10, 1953 fendant lived separate and apart from e the plaintiff and de he bringing of this action? , Te each other for two years next preceding t Answer: "Yes" that the plaintiff, red, adjudged and decreed it is orde absolute divorce from Now, therefore, reby granted an be am she is he ponds of matrimony heretofore Helen Howard Justice, st Odell Justice, iff and the defendant be an and the the defendant, Forre d they are hereby dis- existing between the plaint solved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 10th day of August, 1953+ J. Will Pless, dr: udge Pres g aR KH KR RUM KO "No. 5555 } DIVORCE 4 y i The Divoree Jury #1" being duly sworn and ugh Ray “orrow } empanelled answers the issues submitted to VS. ! it as follows: Mary Irene Morrow IN THE SUPERIOR couRT NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Hugh Ray Morrow Plaintiff vs. ISSUES Mary Irene Morr ow i i | | Defendant j 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for action? more than six months next preceeding the institution of this Answer: Yes ged in 2 * W j ere the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married 45 alle the plaintiff's complaint? Answer: __ Yes 3. Have th e plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for at least two |} years prior to the institution of this action? Yes Answer: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BK -c-ee- AUGUST TERM, 1953 gfCOND WE Monday, August 10, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT yortH CAROLINA JUDGMENT Morrow ' fugh Ray plaintiff vVSe j \ ne Morrow Mary -” Defendant g heard before his Honor, heard and bein r Court of Iredell on to be This cause © oming ust, 1953, term of the Superio less, in the Aug and it appea J, Will P efendant North Carolina, lv served with process, 4n ring to the Court that the d County , da the following issues having has been personal eed by the jury: n submitted to and 7 sw a resident of the State 0 bee f North Carolina 1. Has the plasntiff been g the institution of this action? for more than six months next preceedin Answer: Yess y married as alleged 2, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully in the plaintiff's complaint? Answer: YeSe 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart e institution of this action? for at least two vears prior to th Answer: Yes. Now therefore, on motion of Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward, Attorneys for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, from the ranted an absolute divorce matrimony he etofore Hugh Ray Morrow be amd he is hereby g defendant, Mary Irene Morrow, and that the bonds of nd they are hereby existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be 4 dissolved. This 10 dav of Aug., 1953- ds Will Pless, /r- Pan Judge Presiding xe a \ #{ 1 IN THE S UPERIOR COURT ND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Se usaiay, berese 10th, 1953 J/No. 5552 &. L. Dickens, Sr. | DIVORCE Plaintiff, The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn | and empanelled answers the issues submitteg Vs. to it as follows: Vertie Jarvis Vickens, Defendant. | NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. August Term, 1953, a. L, Dickens, Sr., | Plaintiff, Vs. ’ ISSUES Vertie Jarvis Dickens, Defendant. | 1. Did the Plaintiff, R. L. Jickens, Sr., and the Defendant, Vertie Jarvis Dickens, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes . 2. Have the Plaintiff, Ks bee Yickens, Sr., and the Defendant, Vertie Jarvis Dickens, lived Separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years immediately prior to the comm=ncement of this action? ANSWER _ Yes 3. Has the Plaintiff, R. L. Yickens, Sr., been a bona fide resident f the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commence- ment of this action? ANSWER Yes NORTH CARO ROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY, ” August Term, 1953. aR. L, Vickens, Sr., Plaintiff, Vs. I { j JUDGMENT Vertie Jarvis Vickens, { Defendant, This cause com oming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor J. Will Pless, Juige Presiq ne, and a jury v J » at the August Term 1 Suverior Court for Iredel] County, ’ 953, North Carolina, and the following issues having been and answered by the jury y submitted to, to-wit: 1. Vid the Plaintiff, R, L . Yickens, Jarvis Yickens, imternarry AS Alleved in th —() Sr., and the Defendant, Vertie pie, ® comnlai nt? ANSWER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 9, Have the Plaintiff, K. L. Dickens, Sr., and the Defendant, Vertie Jarvis Dickens, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive arv rs immediately prior to the commencement of this action? yea ANSWER Yes ai” 3, Has the Plaintiff, Rk. L. Dickens, Sr., been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes . The Court further finds that summons was duly served on the Defendant by W, C, Jenkins, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, on June 24, 1953, by delivering personally to the Defendant a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIJERED, ORDEKEU, AVJUDGED AND DECREED, that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant be, and they are dissolved, and the Plaintiff, Rk. L. Jickens, Sr., is granted an absolute divorce from the Defendant, Vertie Jarvis Vickens. let the cost of this action be paid by the Plaintiff. This the 10th day of August, 1953. J. Will Pless, dr. Judge Presiding a a a Wo. #55443 } DIVORCE j The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn “rs. Bessie J. Simmons { and empanelled answers the issues submitted “Te {| to it as follows: Robert L. Simmons { STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY Mrs, Bessie J. Simmons j Plaintiff | ~v8- LssUezs. Robert L, Simmons Defendant ! 1. Were the Plaintiff and defendant married to each other as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes Has the plaintirr been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six Months immediatel+ . precedim the bringing of this action? Answer: a ae Ha ve the plaintiff and defendant lived geparate and apart from each other i, immediately preceding the bringing of this action? A ° nNSwer: Yes — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10, 1953 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court, COUNTY OF IREDELL Mrs. Bessie J. Simmons Plaintiff -Vs- Kobert L. Simmons Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, Judge J, Will Pless, and a Jury, at the August Term 1953, of Iredell County Superior Court, the following issues were submitted to and found by the Jury. 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: "Yes", 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolin for six months next preceding the bringing of this action, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: "Yes", 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and part from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action, and the filine of this Complaint, as allered in the Complaint? Answer: "Yes", IT IS, “ORG, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for the Plaintiff, ORDERED, J ONSIDERED and AJJUDGED, that the bonds of matrimony now ecisting between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved; thatthe plaintiff have the ‘ustody of the two children born of said marriage, and now in her custody, as alleged in the Complaint, and that the plaintirr S hereby granted an absolute divorce. <5 38 PU tums OMERED, that the Plaintiff pay the costs of this action, to be taxed by the vlerk, J. Will Pless, Jr. Presiding Judge. Statesville, N.C, Aupust 10th, 1953, eee ee Key IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10, 1953 40 } DIVORCE Yo. 55 | The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and M. Myers | empanelled answers the issues submitted to A. a y | it as follows: Nell Coleman Myers NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY A. M. Myers | Plaintiff ! Vs |; {eee Nell Coleman Myers | Defendant | 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY A. Me Myers i Plaintiff i . JUDGMENT Ne]] Coleman Myers | Defendant j THIS VAUSE comine on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. Wil] p less, Ur., Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the Aucust Term of the Surerio r Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been properl y served with process by publication, and the following issues having been Submitted to and answered by the jury: l, W . ere the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged n the co plaint? ANSWER - " —Tis"__ 2, H Ca “8 the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Toling for six months we ilies next preceding the bringing of this action? a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: _ "Yes" NOW THEREFORE, on motion of Finch and Chamblee, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, A. M, hiyers be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Nell Coleman Myers, and te bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved; AND IT is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, THIS the lOth day of Aueust, 1953. J. Will Pless, dr. Judge Presiding a OK OK OK No. 5523 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Marvin I. Baker vs Hope P, Barer Marvin I. Baker vs. | ISSUES 4 Hope *. Baker | 1. Were the plaintiff and tne defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes call eeesiaieninas 2. Have th aintiff and : fave the plaintiff and the 4efendant lived separate and apart from each oth r tr e . : er tor tno years next vrecedin- the bringing of t:is action? Answer: Yes ent cceeneees 3 * Has th aij &4 } € plaintiff been 8 bona fide resident of the State of orth varolina { si : or six months next breceding the brining of this action? 4nswer: Yes + ee NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY In the Superior Court Marvin I, Baker JUDGMENT Jury at the Aug. Term of the Superior Court » and it appearing + © the court that the defendant has been IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 ally served with process, and the following issues having been person submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the omplaint? Answer: "Yes." 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Marvin I, Baker be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Hope P, Baker, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed bv the Clerk, This the 10th day of August, 1953. J_. Will Ple Jr Judge Presiding a ee Mo, 5535 Evangeline P, Mayhew " vs taylor Mayhew DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredel} County, August Term 1953. Evangeline P, Mayhew I Vs I ISSUES Taylor Mayhew j I Were the Plaintiff and the Defendant married and are now husband and wi ‘fe, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes II Ha 8 the plaintirr been a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina for Period of six months immediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes Ses SEES PP oe * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----~- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August l0th, 1953 rad Has the plaintiff, Evangeline P. Mayhew lived separate and apart from her husband, Taylor Mayhew for a period of two years prior to the conmencerent of this action. Answer Yes North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County. August Term 1953, Evangeline P. Mayhew | Vs | JUDGMENT Taylor havhew | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this the aucust Term 1953 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North varolina, before his honor J. will Pess, Judge Presiding, and a jury, end the jury having answered the issues submitted to it b* the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is therefore ordered and edjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrinony her t totore existing between the plaintiff, vangeline P. “aynew, and the defendant, Taylor Mayhew, be and the same are hereby dissolved and the plaintiff is eranted an absolute divorce from the defendant. _J. Will Pless, ur. JUDGE PRESIDING a ee “No, . oe oes | DIVORCE _ Fannie W The Vivorce Jury #1" being duly sworm | we ae Wooden | and empanelled answers the issues subsite James Henry wooden it as follows: North Caroling Iredell sounty. In the Superior Court, Aucust Term, 1953. Fannie Wilson “wooden vs. I ISSUES “id the plaintiffs and defendant marry now husband and James Henry Wooden Le each other, and are they » 48 alleged in the complaint? “nswer: Yes 2. OD id the plaintiff and defendant separate and have they lived Separate and apart from €ach other | i for more than two years prior to 7 nstitution Of this action » 48 alleged in the complaint? “nswer: Yes a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----~- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 3, Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months before the commencerent of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: __Yes a North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. August Term, 1953. Fannie Wilson Wooden i 7 ! JUDGMENT James Henry Wooden ' This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, ami adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Fannie Wilson Wooden, and the defendant, James Henry Wooden, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce fiom the defendant. J. Will Pless, Jr. —a-Tunee Prestdias mK KK Ke kK Kk x ‘No. 51,78 | DIVORCE | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly swom Mrs. Alice P, Lytton | and empanelled answers the issues submitted , WS } to it as follows: Roy M. Lytton j NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM 1953 Mrs. Alice P, Lytton, Plaintiff Vs. ISSUES Roy M, Lytton, Defendant 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife » 88 alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 2, Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from *ach other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for nore ¢ han two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 3. 4s the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North “aroli n “for more than six montha vrior to the commencement of this action? Answer; Yes STNG a PEE 29S RG EAS Salter, eAes ow SES At i ae gs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK eececnee AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CURT IREDELL COUNTY Mrs. Alice P. Lytton, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Roy M, Lytton, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J, Will Pless, Judge Presiding, and a Jury and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the records. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds ¢ matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Alice P. Lytton, and the defendant, Roy M. Lytton, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. Will Pless, Jr. udge Presiding | ‘No. 5518 DIVORCE The Vivorce dury #1" being duly sworn and emparielled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Alice Inez Bost Smith . vs Roy L, Smith NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Alice Inez Bost Smith, | Plaintiff j Vs ISSUES Roy L, Smith, j Defendant j 1. Were the plaintirr and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes ce H as the Plaintire been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six mos, ANSW 3. next preceding the bringing of this action? ER: Yes Have th e plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart ” each other for two years next precedin & the bringing of this action? ANSWER: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK <----- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Alice Inez Bost Smith, Plaintiff L, Smith Roy ; Defendant I 1 Vs | | ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J, Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding and a jury at the August Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that defendant has been properly served with process by publication, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: 1, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: "Yes", 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six mos. next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: "Yes," 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and ~art from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: "Yes." | Now therefore, on motion of Finch and Chamblee, attorneys for the plaintiff, it is Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Alice Inez Bost Smith be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Roy L, Smith, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. ‘nd it further appearing to the Vourt,anmd the vourt finding as a fact, tha 4 : . ; * there is one minor child of said marri age, Alice Faye Smith, who has been ‘ : . living with her moth r, the plaintiff, since the separation of her Parents: , . : 8; and it further appearing to the Court and the Court fimding as a fact t ; hat the Plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and eo : : ntrol of said minor child, and that the best interest of said child Would pb : °* served by being in the custody of her said mother; It . is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be and she is hereby granted ul) and “omplete custody and control ofsaid minor child, until the further der of this Court, And ; it is further Ordered that the plaintiff pav the coate of this ots *ON to be taxed by the Clek, T his 10 day of Aug., 1953, J. Will Pless, dr. Judge Presiding ee K KK KR Ke me KK No. 5314 Ww, W. Goodrum vs Vera Loretta Goodrum Ver. Loretta Goodrum more separate and ap North Carolina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----" AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10, 1953 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and | i j empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows’ In the Superior Court North Carolina Iredell Younty j i ISSUES iff been a resident of the State o N. Goodrum vs 1. Has the plaint f Nortn Carolina for than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleges in the complaint? Answer Yes and have they lived g the institution of 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, art continuously for two years next precedin this action? Answer: Yes In the Superior Court Iredell County W. W. Goodrum | vs j JUDGMENT Vera Loretta Goodrum ‘ This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable J, Will Pless, Judge Presi . residing over the August Civil Term 1953, Iredell County Superior Court, and being heard before said Honorable J. Will Pless, and a Jury, the the following issues were submitted to the Jury: 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for mors than six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2. - the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they Lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? - Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes" t is, the ; forever dissolved, and agree between the plaintiff and the defendmt be the defendant is L the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vineule id ’ oretta Goodrum, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge presiding bd * & Wo. 5539 Art vs tressie We IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1953 COND WEEK ------ Ss August 10th, 1953 Monday, } DIVORCE Jo paveree Jury #1" Being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted hur Williams, to it as follows: 1lman Williams IN THE SUPERIOR COURT yORTH CAROLINA REDELL COUNTY Arthur wilt ams, Tressie We other for two yea six months i laintiff i I niet ISSUES 1 llman Williams, Defendant as alleged in the Complaint? 1. Were the Plaintiff and Defendant married, Answer. ‘Yes Have the Plaintiff and De ferdant lived separate and apart from each 2. rs next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes 3. Has the Plaintiff been a re sident of the State of North Carolina for mmediately preceding the commencemant of this action? Answer. Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA AUGUST TERM, 1953 IREDELL COUNTY Arthur Williams, Plaintiff JUDGMENT i 1 ~V~ Tr | i Tressie Wellman Williams, Defendant j This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the and the jury having answered regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, f the plaintiff and against the defendant, the issues submitted to them in favor © as appears in the record; IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of plaintiff and the defendant be, and a arriage heretofore existing between the and the Plaintiff is granted an the same are hereby dissolved and set aside, ab ‘ solute divorce from the Defendant. I t is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the coste of this action. J, Will plese Jie — kek Re ee RK OF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 | DIVORCE | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn an James A, Umberger { empanelled answers the issues submitted to it vs | as follows: Jamie W. Umberger | NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY James A. Umberger | Plaintiff { Vs i ISSUES Jamie W, Umberger | Defendant 4 1. Were the plaintiff anddefendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: Yes 2. Have either the plaintiff or the defendant been a bona fide resident of the Stae of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: _Yes 3e Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding thebringing of this action? ANSWER: _Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY James A, Umberger | Plaintiff | Vs JUDGMENT Jamie W. Umbercer { Defendant j THIS CAUSE com: coming on to be heard, and being heard , before His Honor, J. Will Pless, dr general appearance at this hearing, and the f Ollowi been submitted to and ng issues having answered by the jury: Plaintiff and defe ndant l ‘ the Complaint? awfully married as alleged in ANSWER: "YEgn IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, Awust 10th, 1953 2, Have either the plaintiff or the defendant been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each "Yes" other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: "Yes" AND IT further appearing to the Court that the defendant, Jamie WwW, Umberger, presently has in her sole custody the only child born of this marriage and that the said defendant is a fit and proper person to have custody of said child. NOW THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, James A, Umberger, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Jamie W. Umberger, and that the bonds of matrimony haetofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved; that the defendant be and she is hereby granted the sole custody of the said minor child, Mary Jane Umberger, unti] the further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that tne plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. Witness my hand this 10th day of Aucust, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr, Judge Presiding me we we KK Ke eK Ke Ok om "No. 54% NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY, James A, Umberger, I Plaintiff, | ° ! 1 Jamie W, Umberger, ” ORDER FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILD Defendant, ' This cause Coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor J, Will Ple “8, Yudge presiding at the August Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court, and it ' “ppearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact: ule Th : at one minor child, namely Mary Jane Umberger, was born to the marriage Wion *tween the plaintiff and defendant, having been born on January 23, 1947, and bei , NE Now between six and seven years of age. _ = Le that t} " ne father and mother of the minor child separated December 5, » and h ; ave been since that time living separate and apart; that since the *’Paratio n of the father and mother of the minor child, the minor child has IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----~ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 been, and is now living with her mother, the defendant in this action. -3- That the plaintiff, James A. Umberger, 4s now in the military service of the Un‘ ted States of America, having been in the military service of the Jnited States of America for ten years OF more, and that his compensation is approximately Four Hundred Dollars ($400.00) per month; that heretofore he made ‘or the benefit, maintenance and suvport of his minor child a Class Q allotmat ind-r the rules and regulations applying to men serving in the armed forces of the United States of America, and under which One Hundred Fifty-seven Doll: rs 4 fen Gents (3157.10) was received each month for tne support ana maintenance of s47d cnild; tnat ynly +ighty vollars (320.00) of this contribution for the support and mainten of the minor child was contributed by tne plaintiff, na tne balance was contributed by tne United States of America; that the ve from tne pla.ntiff's allotment, as hereinbefore referred \, sum of Une Hundred rifty-seven Dollars -+en Cents Sourt that the plaintiff should be requires amount, hased on his incane, for the intenance anc et eta ‘ ‘ ’ ‘ } ea nould ance and aid minor child, and tne Sourt finds chat ne shoue rontinue to make Ut! type of allotment which will provide the sum of Une Hunk if ty-sever ‘ y oF ¢ One Hundred fifty-seven Ten Cents ($157.10), and should then pay o i +n ty r + © 1 ; add to that Gre additional un of Twenty Dollars ($20.00), which will make & total sance &@ One Hundr allowance @ One Hundred Seventy-seven Dollars Ten Vents ($177.10) per rnonth for the mai , ¢ : \ aintenance, support and tuition of said minor cnild. 4 ihe court further fir . further finds as a fact that Jamie W. Umberger, the mother of Marv Jane Umberge > mi i , r, the minor child, is a iit and suitable person to have - sugstody and contro aid ni l of said minor child, and wiat the best interest of said child would be serv . Ser ed dv tn y 7 : » : e child being in the control and custody of tke mother at this time, wi tl t j | ith the father having the rirat and privilege to ves the child. | IT IS, THEREFORE, CUNSIDEREI . FORE, CUNSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: « ‘That Jamie wv, Umber | ’ nherger, thedefendant and mother of the minor ait, Mary dane Umberyer, be he 3 Z , , and she is hereby granted the custody and catrol . e minor child, Mary Jane Umberrer 2. That Jame : s A, Umb erger, the plaintiff and father of the minor chiles shall have the ri } nef sie wl / ri nr a4 4 } . and priv ere to visit the chi ld at the home of the mot at reasonable i i ntervals ; and times, at reasonable hours, and for reasonable , lenpthe of time ; that if the father and mother of the child cannot agree on er IN THES UPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «--<<~ AUGJST TERM, 193 Monday, August 10th, 1953 ner having the child to visit him at certain times after the child is child is at present, the Court shall have the rirht to = guch orders in regard thereto as the vourt deems necessary and pmper-. 3, Tht th epla intiff wy for the benefit, maintenance, support and tuition of the aforesaid minor child the sum of One Hundred Seventy-seven Dollars Ten Cents ($177.10) per month, with the first monthly paymat to commence and be paid during the month of August, 1953, and a like payment of a like amount during each calendar month thereafter, with all payments hereunder to be paid to Jamie W. Umberger, the mother of said minor child; that in making the aforesaid monthly payments the plaintiff shall make an allotment for said child, payable to the mother, Jamie W. Umberger, under the rules and regujations of the armed forces of the United States of America, and said allotment to be the highest type of allotment that a service man can make for the maintenance, support and tuition of one minor child; that it is understood that said allotment will be at least One Hundred rifty-seven Dollars Ten Cents ($15210) monthly, amd the plaintiff is to add thereto the sum of Twenty Dollars ($20.00) per month, and pay directly to the defendant for the su! port and maintenance of said minor child the sum of Twenty Dollars ($20.00) in addition to the monthly allotment under the armed forces regulations hereinabove set forth; that in the event Jamie W. Umberga m ther of the minor child remarries, the Twenty Dollar ($20.00) addition to the allotment hereinabove set forth shall cease and the payment for the support of said child reduced to One Hundred Fifty-seven Dollars Ten Cents ($157.10) per month; that if the plaintiff should retire or be discharged from serving in the armed forces of the United States of America, the payments for the maintenance, support and tuition of the aforesaid minor child shall be One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per month, payable each calendar nonth to Jamie W. Umberger, mother of said child, and provided that in tle event Jamie W. Umberger remarries, the payments shall be reduced to bin ty Dollars ($80.00) per month; that when payments hereunder for the support and maintenance of the aforesaid minor child shall for any reason cease, and not be Teoulred to be made, the plaintiff shall then pay the sum of Twenty Dollars ($20.00) each calendar month, commencing with the month following the mont h the payments cease for the maintenance and support of said minor child, & Jamie W. Umbe bi rger to compensate her and provide her with reimbursement for the : support and maintenance that she has fumished for said minor child, and kite sa nti ae monthly payments shall continue until such time amie W. Umberger remarries, but shall cease at the time of her re@arriage, 4. T hat the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff. ——SSSEEE = E We. | ; -—— lt a SE oe — Seren er =z a > li 7) ee ie his mh [- ) ) 2 a matters herein cmtained as the Court may at any time hereafter deem proper and necessary. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 5. This cause is retained for such further orders in regard to the It further appears to the Court that the above entitled action was brought by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant upon the ground of two years separation, and that the defendant filed an anwer praying for the custody of the minor child, and for an order requiring the plaintirt to pay a sufficient amount for the maintenance and support of said child, and that a judgment granting the plaintiff an absolute divorce from the defendant has already been entered at this term of Iredell County Superior Court, This the 10th day of August, 1953. Consented to: Finch & Chamblee By F, G. Chamblee Attorneys for plaintiff? Jamie W. Umberger efendant Adams, Dearman & Winberry by 0. 5. Aenterry ttorneys for Defen ant. No. 5550 Isaac Wansley (also Maddox), vs. Ida Thomas Wansley North Carolina Iredell County Isaac Wansley (algo L. C. Maddox), ee a ae known as L, C, known ag Plaintiff vs. Ida Thomas Wansley, Defendant l. Did the complaint? Answer: 2. Have J. Will Pless, Jr. a a ee ee DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn a and empanelled answers the issues submitt Judge Presiding to it as follows: In the Superior Court August, 1953, Term 1 Plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 3. Has theplaintiff been aresident of the State of North Carolina for than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action? more Answer: Yes North Carolina Iredell County Isaac maeiey (also known as , Plaintiff L, ©. Maddox vs. Ida Thomas Wansley, Defendant In the Superior Court August, 1953, Term JUDGMENT OF ABSOLUTE DIVORCE This cause coming on to be heard at the regular August, 1953, Term of Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding and a jury and the jury havine answered the following issues as indicated and as appear in the record, viz: 1, Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer; 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for two years immediately preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yeg 3- Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceeding the commancement of this action? Answer! Yes It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and t.ey are hereby, “No. 5545 NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL county Viola MeCai) dissolved and that the plaintiff be, anmihe is hereby, granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding a a a a a ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: N, D, Blackwelder, Bryant W Warren, C L Weston I L E Overcash, E E Boan, BC Payne, WC Lackey, Plaintiff M L Gant, James E Hollar, G B Morrow, Ben E i Harris and G M Pierce. Pee ISSUE he Unkno 8 wn heirs of an Logan, deceased efendants 1, Did Sam t intestate the lit Loran, a resident # Iredal County, North Carolina, die h day of July, 1945, leaving no children or blood relatives IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «-<-<- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Momay, August 10th, 1953 surviving him but leaving surviving him his wife, Mamie Logan? Answer: Yes E | i) NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT hi ‘ ; , 1 IREDELL COUNTY Viola McCall vs. ! Plaintiff | i JUDGMENT t ae 4. The unknown heirs of ie 3, Sam Logan, deceased Mi Defenda.ts | - eae a oe This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless presiding at the August Term of Superior Court of Iredell] County, North varolina, and the Jury having answered the Issue submitted to them as follows: 1. Did San Loan, a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina, die intestate the llth day of July, 1945, leaving no children or blood relatives Surviving him but leavine surviving him his wife, Mamie Logan? Answer: Yes, j Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that Mamie Logan was H) the sole surviving heir of ' f Sam Logan and acquired fee simple title to the Subject property under the terms of the General Statutes of North Carolina, iH Section 29-1 Rule 8, and that t | 1 action, ne plaintiff be taxed with the cost in this *his the l0th day of Aurpust, 1% 3, J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding No. 5420 Jesse Fox I vs | Suma Fox j Jury Sworn and empanelled, At the close of the plaintiff" S evidence the defeniant moved for Judgment as of non- suit, Motion allowed, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----=- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 15g? RTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court NO IREDELL COUNTY. depute: Cote, 0: Cornwall Fixture Corporation, Plaintiff, | Vs. } FINAL JUDGNENT Oscar R. Mills, T/A I Mills Electric Shop, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding at the August Term, 1953, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, and Scott, Collier and Nash, Attorneys for the Defendant, that the Plaintiff and the Defendant have agreed upon a settlement and judgment covering all matters and things arising on the complaint and answer filed in this cause, to-wit: 1, ‘that the Plaintiff recover of the Defendant the sum of Four Hundred forty Dollars Ninety-eight cents ($440.98), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 2nd day of May, 1951, until paid. 2. That the Defendant be taxed with the cost of tnis action. IT IS, ‘ick ORE, by and with the consent of the Plaintiff and the Jefendant VONSIDERED, ORUZ! ‘J, AVJUDGED AND UDiCREED: l. Tha the Plaintiff recover of the Defeniant the sum of your Hundred forty Dollars Ninety-eight Cents ($440.98), together with interest thereon at "ae rate of six per cent per annum from the 2nd day of Lay, 1951, until paid. ne Vefendant be taxed with the cost of this action by the Clerk the 10th day of August, 1953. J. Will Ples ee Judge Presiding “on sented to: ADAMS, DEARMAN WINBERRY BY; o "pels Winberry Attorneys for the Plaintiff OSCAR R, yw ay . ae ILLS, T/A MILLS ELECTRIC SHOP Oscar R, Mills ~~ Defendans SOIT, COLLIER ». NASH BY; ae A. Collier I °rneys for the Defendant ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «-<--- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Momay, August 10th, 1953 surviving him but leaving surviving him his wife, Mamie Logan? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT #4] IREDELL COUNTY Viola McCall ‘ ae ee Plaintiff The unknown heirs of Sam Logan, deceased 1 | vs. | JUDGMENT } ! Defenda.ts I This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless presiding at the August Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and the jury having answered the Issue submitted to them as follows: 1. Did San Loran, a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina, die intestate the llth day of July, 1945, leaving no children or blood relatives surviving him but leavine surviving him his wife, Mamie Logan? Answer: Yes, 4 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that Mamie Logan vas } the sole surviving heir of Sam Logan and acquired fee simple title to the ’ Subject pronerty under the terms of the General Statutes of North Carolina, Section 29-1 Rule 8, and that the plaintiff be taxed with the cost in this action, ; i *his the 10th day of Aurust, 1% 3 J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding No. 5420 Jesse Fox 1 vs Suma Fox ’ Jury Sworn and empanelled, At the close of the plaintirr? S evidence the defeniant moved for Judgment as of non-suit, Motion allowed. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----=- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 1 53 4 « NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. August Tern, 1953, Cornwall Fixture Corporation, 4 Plaintiff, | Vs. | FINAL JUDGNENT Oscar R. Mills, T/A I Mills Electric Shop, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, J. Will Pless, Yudge Presiding at the August Term, 1953, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, and Scott, Collier and Nash, Attorneys for the Defend ant, that the Plaintiff and the Defendant have agreed upon a settlement and judgment covering all matters and things arising on the complaint and answer filed in this Cause, to-wit: 1, ‘that the Plaintiff recover of the Defendant the sum of Four Hundred forty Dollars Ninety-eight cents ($440.98), together with interest thereon at . . . : ay n+4 naia the rate of six per cent per annum from the 2nd day of May, 1951, until paid. 2. That t Jefendant be taxed with the cost of this action. IT is, “t°URL, by and with the consent of the Plaintiff and the Jefendant, t SIDER iy Ulin Ay 4 JJUUGEU AND UiACREED: Ls ina the Plaintiff recover of the Defemiant the sum of yvour Hundred ‘orty Dollars Ninety- ight Cents ($440.98), torether with interest thereon at me rate of six per cent per annum from the 2nd day of way, 1951, until paid. @. That the Defendant be taxed with tne cost of this action by the Clerk of thi . “lS Vourt, ‘nls the 1¢ tn day of Aurust, 1953.6 J. Will Ples , VI. Judge Presiding “onsent ed to: AJANS | DEAR} AN WINBERRY Ry. bd C. 8, Winber Attorneys for the Plaintiff OSCA AILLS RR. MILLS, T/A MILLS ELECTRIC SHOP Oscar R, Mills ~~ Defendant Scorr, COLLIER ¢& NASH BY: ae A. Collier Morneys for the Defendant ay . ae ee ee ee Hi ae blige ttt Senn’ "ai a 4 ears YH tiy = IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Monday, August 10th, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 12th, 1953 k Katherine D Sloop vs William E Sloop CRN SENSES O SS OR aaa es. Continued This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wedne sday | TF. . Dorothy Moore Leonard vs John Leonard -------------..-. Continued Morning, August 12th, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, + Carl 0 Ware vs Donnie H Ware -------------------------- Continued | j t ‘ Theresa Campbell vs James W Campbell ------------------ Continued : | DIVORCE ay m ani ‘No. 5473 - ~~ a empanelled as follows: ie — 1 | /y Thomas Eugene Barnette vs Frank Graham «© Preston Graham-Continued Jones s. Garne homas, G. B. Morrow, Ben E, ee ; | F Piet No. 5547 omas bug Margaret | Harris, HW erean.' J & Weber, . =. a 4Nio. 5263 Mrs Clyde D Jmkins vs Charles W Lewis « Morrison Janes M. Jones | Menscer, Lester Hayes, Roy Warren, James E, hid he } ” * Purniture « Fixture Co Inc oo-eennennn nnn nnnnnnnnnn one Cont inued | McKnight, R H Westmoreland, Don R Hagler and elie | ie ce hah | CR Munday. hl j My} No. 5372 J KR Cashion T/A Star Milling Yo vs A A Setzer --------- Continued : Melt nM a) —_ 7 WoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT eT Yt. “YNo. 5424 Hubert W Blackwood vs Lois Laws Blackwood ------------- Continued na : at hid | IREDELL COUNTY bi | it | ri /Sp #657 Annie Littlejohn, et al vs Mary Connor, et al --------- continued | | i | Margaret Jones | i i If 1 } “No. 5465 Betty Lou jolleman PNF vs P D vames & Wm dames -------- Continued i a . vs | ISSUES aii : “No. 5490 J 2° soforth vs dames b. wiite -nen------ 2-2 eee ---------- vontinued } ha | James M Jones j het J JNO. 5532 In Re: Caveat to will of w Press Sharpe e--------~------ Continued i = l. Yid the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the (ite |e Complai nt? a. ’ anpear’ne to the Jourt that +. L. Jsu:kworth, Juror, is a non-resident Answer Yes __. —— therefore ordered by the vourt that the ‘ ==) (fo) Ses = a) 7 = 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for ‘ine heretofore imposed be stricken out. ten consecutive years, without cohabitation, and are they still so living separate and apart by reasonof the incurable insanity of the defendant? ~s a Answer Yes ‘ 3. Has the defendant been confined for ten consecutive vears next preceding 1 Si the institution of this action, in a institution for the care and treatment for the mentally disordered? Answer Yes if t| 4. Has theplaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for ' more than six months next preceding thefiling ofthis Complaint? Answer Yes 9» Is the deft. James NM. Jones, incurably insane? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLTN 4 CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mergaret Jones I Vv ; : JUDGMENT James M. Joneg i Th 18 cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the August Term, 1953 Superior ¢ : vourt of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge “TSiding his Hon@w able -ourt take ; "S a recess until Wednesday Morning, August 12th, » mda J ' O'clock A, M Vie 1953, at 9:30 ury hevine enewered 2]) the isaves submitted to it in the favor of - the Plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the ord; —_-e- ee ae U a 1 ‘ ae ~~ pw ——— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August l2th, 1953 It is, therefore, orderal adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrinony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same an, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce fron the defendant. The Court finds asafact that thefeme plaintiff has no property and that she is not financially able to provide for the care and maintenance of the defendant. This the 12th day of August, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presid ing woe OK Kk OK ek ek ee No. 5405 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Jury sworn and empanelled as folloxs: IREDELL COUNTY t Vharlie Menscer, Lester Hayes, Roy Warren, James! McKnieht, KR H Westmoreland, Don R. Hagler and Ck Munday. Huerl C. Evans, Plaintiff Vs. ISSUES Oddie Corrie, Defendant 1. Is the Plaintiff the owner of the Wizard 8 cubic foot electric refrigerator, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: No 2. What damages if any is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant because of the wrongful detention of the refrigerator? Answer: 325.00 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Huerl C, Evans, Plaintiff vs | JUDGMENT Oddie Vorrie, Defendant This cause Coming on to be heard ? end being heard, at the August Ter™ 1953 of Iredel) vounty Superior Court before his Honor, J. Will Pless, oes Judge Presiding, and a Jury and the Jury havi d ng answered the issues submitte 1. Is the i Plaintiff the Owner of the Wizard 8 cubic foot electric refrigerator, 48 alleged in the Complaint? An ewer: No i G. B. Morrow, Ben E. Harris, i W Warren, Jd C Weber, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----=- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 12th, 1953 2, What damages if any is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendan Answer?_$25-00_ It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant Oddie t because of the wrongful detention of the refrigerator? Corrie, be and she is hereby declared to be the owner of the property mentioned 0 ’ nd described in the Complaint and the writ of claim and delivery issued in a this action; it is further ordered, adjudged have and recover of the defendant the sum o the defendant shall each pay one-half of the This the 12th day of August, 1953. No. 5428 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: N. D, Blackwelder and decreed that the plaintiff $25.00 and that the plaintiff and costs as taxed by the Clerk, J. Will Pless, dr, Judge Presiding Bryant W. Warren, C, L, Weston, L, +. Overcash, E. E. Boan, B. C. Payne, Wh. C. Lackey, Mi. L. Gant, James E, Hollar, W. E. Fulbright, Jr., G, & NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Zeb V. &, Dickson, Plaintiff, Vs. The Board of Education of Iredell County, Defendant. Pierce and Mrs. Garnell Thomas. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, AUGUST TERM, 1953. ISSUES l. Did the plaintiff and the defendant enter into a contract, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2, If g0, Complaint? Answer: Yes en did the defend™mt breach said contract, as alleged in the 3. What damages, if any, has the plaintiff sustained by reason of said breach of Contract? “answer: l -00 NORTH CAROLINA , TREDELL counry., Zeb V. K, Yickson, [ Plaintirr, Vs, | The Boa j tredell ‘Coome tucation of Defendant, | Supery IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1953. JUDGMENT T nr his ~ use cominre on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the ee & = oo a y “ te g a § = ete * — oe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 12th, 1953 Presiding, and a jury, md the jury lm ving answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set forth in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintife recover of the defendant the sum of $1345.00 together with the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. ae Will Pless Jr. Judge Presiding wo KR Kk oe ee eo INo. 5065 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. August Term 1953 Fred W. Hudson, Plaintiff, ORDER TO PAY ADAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERRY , ATTORNEYS AT LAW, FOR SERVICES RENDERED “oor Food Store, Inc., I ! Vs. l Defendant, j This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor J. “ill Pless, Judge Presiding at the Aucust Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior vourt, upon the petition of R. hi, Linker, Receiver of Moor Food Store, Inc., and the petition of Adams, Dearman winberry, Attorneys at Law, thereto attached, and the Court finds: ule That Adame, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys at Law, rendered services a 2 . . 8 set forth in the foregoing petitions in preparing and filing an answer fe t ( j he defendant corporation, and in making the stockholders parties and repari z 2g preparing and filing an answer for them, and obtaining and having transferred to the Receiy er a chatiel mortgage against the Estate of Mrs. Effie Flowers, in the ar 1) - amount of One 4nousand fifty Dollars ($1,050.00), plus interest. o2< That th uy ~ Sum of One Hundred fifty Dollars ($150.00) is a fair and reasoneblt charge f t i Be +or the services rendered by Ada: hie ‘8, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys at and the same s} , Should be paid by R, M, Linker, Receiver of Moor Food Store, nc., from funds in his hands as Receiver IT IS THEREFORE C , , E, “SIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Receiver Of Moor PF o \ttorne T ys at “aw, for ser That Re mm, Linker, ur Dearma? & “nberry, ood Store, Inc., pay to Adams, vices rendered forth in the petition hereinabove referred to by them as set ’ and the statement of account filed with the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 12, 1953 iver, the sum of One Hundred Fifty Dollas ($150.00), and that the same Rece ’ aid out of any funds wiich now are, or which may hereafter come into the be Pp nands of the Receiver, and charged as a part of the cost and expense of this an receivership. This the 12 day of August, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding x<kekn ke & & /No. Sp 3617 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mary Sharpe Morrison and Frank L, Sharpe, Jr. Sharpe, ’ Plaintiffs, Fennie Sharpe Hinshaw, Nancy Sharpe Faldowski and husband, Edward Leo Paldowski, and Sarah “lizabeth Sharpe, Defendants. i ' -vs- I ORDER I ! t This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor J. Will Pless, dr., at the Aucust, 1953, term of Superior Court of Iredell vounty, and it appearing to the court that it is necessary in this action that a referee be appointed to hear the evidence offered by the plaintiffs and defendants, as the issues raised in the pleadings pertain to the counterclaim set out by the defendants, IT Is, THEREFORE, ordered, adjudged and decreed that Wm. S. Neel be, am he is hereby appointed referee of this court, and is directed to proceed to hear the evidence of the defendants and plaint iffs, and to report at the November, 1953 term of Iredell Superior Court of his findings and conclusions of law as aise on the issues of the counterclaim alleged by the defendants in this cause. This Cause is retained for further orders. J. Will Pless, dr / i << me a mK POSSESS FOR SALE NON-TAX PAID LIQUH The judgment heretofore pronounced is str’cken out and the following is the judgment of the Court: That the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for Four (4) Months and assigned to work at any county institution for such period &s her services are satisfactory, otherwise to be assigned to work under the supervision of the Women's Division of the State Yirhway and Public “orks Commission. em Ns er i iit } yrs : : if { bd m. roe ee ten IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Wednesday, August 12, 1953 “No. Sp 3708 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT IREDELL COUNTY Harvey Harris, Plaintiff Mrs. Nina Harris Powell, ! I -vs- : ORDER | Guardien, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding at August, 1953 term of Superior Court of Iredell County, on motion of the defendant, through her counsel, to continue the case to the November term of court, for the reason that witnesses were not available at this term of court, and the court is of the opinion that the case should be continued; Whereupon counsel for the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal of the defendant for the reason that there was no provision in the law - for appeals in a case of this kind; the court after hearing the argumet of the counsel determined that the Suprior Court by dictum had inferred that an appeal lies, IT Is, THEREFORE, ordered, adjudged and decreed that: 1. The case be contimed from the Aurust term to the November term of Iredell Superior Court for convenience of witnesses and for medical testimony to be offered in this case. 2. The court denies the motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal, The cay i ause is retained for further orders. u a a oe a om TI 9 C his Honorable vOurt takes a rece 8s until Th August 13th, + 8t 9:00 ofclock A, ¥ ursday, Augu 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -=---= AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday Morning, August 13th, 1953, at 9:00 o'clock A, M, ‘No. 5504 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: ©, L. Weston, N. D. Blackwelder, L. EB. Overcash, E. BE, Boan, W. 4. Lackey, James E. Hollar, W. E. Fulbright, Ur. G, B. Morrow, Ben E. Harris, H. W. Warren, J. C, Weber, Charlie Menscer. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY F. E. Creedmore and Sons, R, H, Creedmore and J. E. Creedmore, T/A The City Cab Company _ Plaintiffs Guy S. Cornacchione and wife, Shirley Patterson Lowrance Cornacchione, Defendants | 1 I vs I 4 ' f 1, Was the automobile of the Plaintiffs damaged by the negligence of tue Defendants as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: Yes 2. Did the Plaintiffs, by their own negligence, contribute to the damage to their automobile as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER: __No 3. What amount, if any, are the Plaintiffs entitled to recover of the Defendants? ANSWER: _ $175.00 4. Was the automobile of the Defendants damaged by the negligence of the Plaintiffs as alleged in the Answer? AIS WER: _ 5. What amount, if any, are the defendants entitled to recover of the Plaintiffs? ANSWER: LT eet On ee an ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -<----- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY fF. E. Creedmore and Sons, R. H, Creedmore and J. E. Creedmore, T/a The vity Cab Company, Plaintiffs vs Guy S. Cornacchione and wife, Shirley Patterson Lowrance Sornacchione, Defendants This Cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding, and a jury at the August 1953 Term of the Suverior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina; and the jury having answered tiie Issues submitted to them as follows: 1. Was the automobile of the Plaintiffs damaged by the nerligence of the Defendants as alleged in the Compalint? ANSWER: _Yes 5 Ty: 2, Did the Plaintiffs, by their own negligence, contribute to the damage their automobile es alleged in the Answer? 3. What amount, if any, are the Plaintiffs entitled to recover of the “endants? ANSWER: _ $175.00 We . } ; ke Was the automonvile { the Defendants damaged by the negligence of me Plaintiffs as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER: 5. What amount, if « f any, are the Vefendants entitled to recover of the 1 Se & GY i Mme VT » it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Plaintiffs v and recover of the Defend ' efendants the sum of $175.00 Dollars, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the 6} “ 4 DY Une wu erk, This 13 day of August, 1953, J. Will Pless, dr. Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----~ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13, 1953 Ho. 5452 WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK J. Pe Holtshouser, Plaintiff vs Joe Billy Putnam, and, Mrs. M, Putnam deste Defendants i I i ORDER { } This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County upon motion of the defendant, Joe Billy Putnam that the order issued by this court on the 1éth day of January, 1953 for the arrest of the said Joe Billy Putnam be dismissed and the bond therein required be vacated, and being re ard pursuant to an order issued by this court directed to the plaintiff and his attorneys on the 1th day of February, 1953; and after hearing the contentions of the parties, it appears that the order heretofore issued by the court on the 15th day of January, 1953 should not be iismissed and that the bond therein required should not be vacated: it is therefore ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed | hat tr said motion in the cause made by the said Joe Billy Putnam be and the same is hereby denied. This bth day of March, 1953. Uv, G. Smith . Clerk of Superior Vourt The defendant through his attorneys Messrs. Childs and Childs and W. J. Allran, Jr., except and object to th: signing of the roreroing oruer and give notice of appeal to the Superior Court. Appeal allowed - further notice waived. This 4th dav of March, 1953. Cc, G, @ith, ©.5.C. The foregoing order of the Clerk of the Superior Court is in all respects confirmed and anproved. To this ruling by the Court the defendants object. Exception. J. Will Pless, Jr- udge Presiding a a ee ae : ee ae es peore Sore a = ae PS 7 x saz —_ aA a } | = 7 Me eh | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY F. E. Creedmore and Sons, R, H, Creedmore and J. E, Creedmore, T/a The City Cab Company, Plaintiffs Guy S. Cornacchione and wife, Shirley Patterson Lowrance vornacchione, Defendants i | ‘ vs { I | I This Cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor J, Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding, and a jury at the August 1953 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina; and the jury having answered tie Issues submitted to them as follows: 1. Was the automobile of the Plaintiffs damaged by the nerligence of the Jefendants as alleged in the Compalint? ANSWER: Yes 2. Did the Plaintiffs, by their own negligence, contribute to the damage -neir automobile as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER: No —_—-——— _ 3. What amount, if any, are the Plaintiffs entitled to recover of the Jefendants? ANSWER: 1 00 Lh. Was the automo ile sf the Defendants damaged by the negligence of the 4S alleged in the Answer ? ANSWER: es Plaintiffs 5. What amount, if any, are the Yefendants entitled to recover of the Plaintiffs? ANSWER: J. Will Pless. Jr Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13, 1953 to. 5452 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK IREDELL COUNTY J. P. Holtshouser, Plaintiff vs Joe Billy Putnam, and, Mrs. M. Putnam Docie Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Suverior Court of Iredell County upon motion of the defendant, Joe Billy Putnam that the order issued by this court on the l‘th day of January, 1953 for the arrest of the said Joe Billy Putnam be dismissed and the bond therein required be vacated, and being teard pursuant to an order issued by this court directed to the plaintiff and his attorneys on the lth day of February, 1953; and after hearing the contentions of the parties, it appears that the order heretofore issued by the court on the 15th day of January, 1953 should not be dismissed and that the bond therein required should not be vacated: “t is therefore ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed that tle said motion in the cause made by the said Joe Billy Putnam be and the same is hereby denied. This kth day of March, 1953. Ul. G, Smith Clerk of Sunerior Court The defendant through his attorneys Messrs. Uhilds and Childs and 4. J, Allran, Jr., except and object to th: signing of the foregoing order and give notice of appeal to the Superior Court. Appeal allowed and further notice waived, This kth dav of March, 1953. C. G, Gith, C.S.C. The foregoing order of the Clerk of the Superior Court is in all respects confirmed and anproved, To this ruling by the Court the defendants object. Exception. Jr. J. Will Pless udge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13th, 1953 No. 5458 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ai} IREDELL COUNTY All-State Equipment Company, Inc., Plaintiff Oscar R. Mills, individually, and 1 1 Ve JUDGMENT t T/A MillsElectric Shop, Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the Honorsbje J. will Pless, Wm, Judge Presiding at the August 1953 Term of the Superior Court of Ireddl County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant that the matters and tnings in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; It is, ther fore, orderea, adjudged, and decreed that the plédintiff be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk, this 13th day of Aucust, 1953. fe = I el J. Will Pless, dr. Judge Presiding E vonsented to: a o % nae ’ > ud | = | Co ; rn . yy ABER ae Ihe OLE _ Samra e bun: — ss BY: F. G. Chamblee Attorneys for the Plaintiff aa a MC LAUGHLIN AND BATTLEY = i FF BY: w,. 2. Battley Attorneys for the Jefendant Io re Ne | gkeekuh ke ke @ | ' SE EES EES an IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TEM, 1953 Thursday, August 13th, 1953 ho. 54,61 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. August Term 1953 Harold L. Clodfelter, By his Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: C¢. L. Next Friend, Mrs. C. L. Weston, BC Payne, N D Blackwelder, G M Pierce ' , lter Lester Hayes, Roy Warren, James E MeKni ht Seerereer Plaintiff, R H Westmoreland, Don R. Hagler, C R Munday, o. ISSUES ' I | & W Long and Glen F Shoemaker. | ' w, L. Parrish, Defendant. 1, Was the plaintiff injured, and his automobile damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer _ Yes ee 2. Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contri ute to his injury and the damage to his automobile, as alleged in the Answer? Answer _ Yes ° 3. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant for personal injuries? Answer ° 4. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recwer of the defendant for damages to his automobile? Answer ‘ NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Harold L. Vlodfelter, I 'y His Next Friend, Mrs. C. L. Clodfelter i Plaintiff Vs jew ic Io Im It l= 19 | ' “. L. Parrish I | Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor Jd. ai - ll Pless, Ure, Judge Pre siding, and a jury, at the August 1953 Term of the § : , 7 ‘ ; é ; “uerior Court of Iredell vounty, North Carolina; and the jury having @wered the Issues submitted to them as follows: 1, Was the plaintiff injured and his automobile damaged by the Meeligence of the defendant as alleged in the Vomplaint? ANSWER: Yes “+ Mid the plaintate, by his ow negligence, contribute to his Persona] injury and property ANSWER : damage as alleged in the Answer? Yes ¥ | ea es) =) << a ‘mma 9 é — = ——, eee a ' i= \A »), = ™ : ) ad , re aE. Nia hie Vea IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13th, 1953 NOW, THENEFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintire nave and recover nothing of the defendant and that plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This 13 day of August, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr. . Will Piess, Jr.——— Judge Pre siding ae OK oe 445575 NORTH CAROLINA, In theSuverior Court TLEDELL August Term 1953 SOUNTY,. Roberta Gofath Pierce, by her Next Friend, M. C, Goforth, Plaintiff, ORDER FOR ALIMONY PENDENTE LIT, MAINTENANCE, SUPPORT AND COUNSEL FEES vw VSe Bobby Franklin “lerce, an infant, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Alfred E. Pierce, Defendant. this cause coming on to be heard by his Honor J. Will Pless, dr., dudge Presiding at the rerular August Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court, upon tne application of the plaintiff, Roberta Goforth Pierce, for maintenance and subsistence for herself and for reasonable counsel fee during the pendency of this action; And the Court finds that the plaintiff, who is an infant, is duly repre- Qo 7 N wnt , a ” sented by her Next *riend, hi. C, Goforth, and the defendant, who is an infant, is duly represented by his Suardian Ad Litem, Alfred E. Pierce, and that the plaintiff, Roberta Goforth Pierce , and the defendant, Bobby Franklin Pierce, wore present in Court, and the plaintiff was represented in Court by C. B. Winberry, Attorney, of the firm of ‘dans, Jearman and Winberry, and the defend- and was represented by his Attorneys, McLaughlin and Battley; ‘nat the defendant himself was riven more than five days notice of this nearing, but that his muardian ad Litem, Alfred &, Pierce, had only four days novice of the hearing, but that McLaughlin and Battley, Attorneys for the de- fendant, a he defend: J ee » and the defendant fiimself, and the juardian Ad Litem, waived any urther requireme of : - Ouirement of notice and complaint and agree that this hearing and raer can nr< das if 5 ceed as if the “Uardian ad Litem had actually had five days notice and that the same shall have the same force and effect as if the Guardian ad and the afficavit f41 d d dant, an after reading and hearing the « "sw oe , omplai ? sel for the p paaint and affidavit and the argument of coun laintirer and defendant ’ and theCourt finds that the plaintiff 48 ‘ t } 2] i : 7 and that the plaintiff has pelt IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----= AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13, 1953 t means whereon to subsist during the prosecution of this action and to a) not suffic er and necessary expense thereof, and is of the opinion and finds rop jefray the P jg a fact that the f this action and to counsel fees to prosecute this action: dency 0 plaintiff is entitled to maintenance and subsistence during the 17 13, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: ’ That the defendant, Bobby Franklin Pierce, pay into the office of the l. f the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on September 2, 1953, Clerk 0 f Thirty Dollars ($30.00) for the maintenance, support and subsistence of the sum 0 rhe plaintiff, his wife. 2, That thereafter, and on Tuesday of each week thereafter, that the defend- int, Bobby Franklin Pierce, pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, for the maintenance, support and subsistence of nis wife, one-half of his weekly income remaining after deduction of withholding taxes for Federal income tax purposes and social security taxes, provided, however, that said weekly payments shall not be less than Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) per week, and that the same shall be paid not later than Tuesday of each week, commencing with Tuesday, September 11, 1953. 3. That the payments made by the defendant under the foregoing provisions shall be disbursed and paid out by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County to the plaintiff, Roberta Goforth Pierce. 4, That the defendant, Bobby Franklin Pierce, pay into the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, not later than Nov- ‘ber 1, 1953, the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) as a payment on counsel fees for B. Winberry, Attorney for Roberta Goforth Pierce. d» That by consent of the parties hereto, the defendant shall have the right, rovided he makes the payments provided for in this order, to take his wife, the ‘laintiff, as a dependent for income tax purposes. 6. The payments which the defendant in the preceding paragraph has been or- “red to make, shall continue during the pendency of this action, or until the fur- ‘er orderg of this Court, 7. This cause is retained for further orders and decrees. ‘Ms the 13th day of August, 1953. J. WILL PLESS, JR. Judge Presiding i ee ~ sae a. 2 ma nee eater ol Ss ea oe anil a ne ’ = Bi : eed ees ee ma es IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------~- AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13, 1953 “#5548 ; NORTH CAROLINA, uilty of no neglect whatever, and that the neglect of Black under the cir- heen & In the Superior Court igs not imputable to the defendant Deal. The Court further finds that synstances +8 IREDELL COUNTY. August Term 1953 In the Matter of the Custody and t has a good and meritorious defense to the plaintiff's cause of ace Control of William Junior Combs. rhe defendan ORDER 4 that the matter is one fortrial and determination by a jury where the F tion, an re me tenn This matter coming on to be heard before His Honor J. Will Pless, Jr Judge =) Holding the regular August Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court; _— opportunity to appear and have their day in court. parties ha re he Cort is of the6pinion and so finds that following the rendition of the The & And upon motion of Messrs. J. H. Burke and R. A. Hedrick, Attorneys for tie ment, that thedefendant should have sought other counsel and taken further ee - ° + the I 1 ’) G i petitioner, Lucille Combs, and by and with the consent of Messrs. J. G, Lewis, action before paying the judgment, but that he continued to rely upon the advice 1} tie Ba hee sof Nid ae a ik DRE "] ; ‘ 1 a) ’ ’ :* i i (me } Pi be ; ei ime. ie ; ' i i } rm i | i ‘Us ty } ‘ i ti f poe if ft 7 iw Macon M, Simons, and C. B. Winberry, Attorneys for the respondent, Clay J. Combs ’ it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this cause and all matters and things therein, be continued until the November Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Court, and that the order entered by His Honor George B. Patton on June 26, 1953, in this cause in regard to the Care, custody and control of the minor child therein named, and the other provisions therein contained in regard to the visits of the father and mother to said child, be, and the same are to remain as therein set forth, ani to continue in force and effect until the regular November 1953 Term of Iredell County Superior ¢c ~ and : : Ounty Superior vourt, and until such time as further orders are made in this cause, all without prejudice to either party. This the 13th jay of August, 1953, J. WILL PLESS, JR. Judge Presiding RRR RHR EH Ke em #5437 J. W. Moore, vs. Howard Deal, This Cause w: . } Sante as heard before the undersigned Judee upon the motion of the def ant to set aside the ; te ne judgment by default and inquiry and the final judgment in this and evid ence, cause, Up a idavi on the af iday inds t! : . its the Court fi : . , Prior to the institution oO of Kannapolis, this action the defendant engaged Bedford WW. Bla ct, who was ’ a 4 ‘ ~ & reputable attorney, to represent him in all matter of the CoOlligion between the on January 26, growing out : } j gant vehicles of the plaintiff and the defen arranceme . . riot esment having been made approximately six months P G to the instituti nof j ; Ol this j ] j : ; sana tion, Fo] ‘Owing the institution of theaction the 5° é Pletely neglected n; li | Elected his Client's interests in failing to file an answer vithin the time al] : | m ~ S4L0wed by lay ° OF to put the is ‘ ; irther ne lected his dut; vs Same into proper form, and fu I “4“C1eES as an att j | Orney in faili ie ome ; . Ng to take il ia . es oo steps to protect h ° ne oe fehdant was const: , r from trial upon the inquiry. At all times the “ONSstantly in Communication r was taking with the said Bla » 4nd the co t he Care ck who assured him tha Of the matte r Ourt finds 4S a fact that the defendant - ¢ Black, and upon his advice paid off the execution "under protest" without first seeking to have the judgrrent set aside or take other stens to protect himself, nso doing, the defendant demonstrated a gullibility that is hard to reconcile vith proper diligence, but that the same does not constitute such latches as would iofeat his motion nor estop him in presenting his position to the Cout. In view of the fact that other factors may later enter into the disnosition of the amount paid by the defendant under execution to the plaintiff, the Court does not at this time recuire the repayment of said amount by the plaintiff, reserving the authority to make such further orders in that connection as the determination of the case upon proper trial may reouire. The defendant consented to the sourt s tion in this regard. Upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, it is now ordered that the judg- “ent by default and inouiry before the Clerk and that the verdict end judgment upon “¢ inquiry dated March 1953, be end the same ere hereby set aside. The defendant is allowed 30 days from this date in which to file answer or “erwise plead, This the 13th day of August, 1953. J. KILL PLESS, JR. Judge Presiding APPEAL ENTRIES ‘POUR, PLAINTIFF, VS. HOWARD DEAL, DEFENDANT. ™ : ‘0 thefindings of the Court in the foregoing order, the plaintiff in apt time ‘hd in 9 fn Pen Court excepts, and to the signing of the foregoing judgment and order, the Dlai mtiff in apt time and in open Court excepts and appeals to the Supreme “OUrt of North Carolina, Uren, and in open Court in apt time gives notice of appeal to the @ Co “rt of North Carolina for errors assigned and to be assigned. Notice of “Peal p iven ; ”~ in open Court, further notice waived. By consent the plaintiff is allow- ~ Wenty. fi ve days in which to make up and serve case on appeal to the Supreme Court *rolina, ‘Ale *Xteptions ‘ C and the defendant twelve days thereafter to serve countercase or Appeal bond fixed in the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00). Thi 8 the 13th day of August, 1953. Judre Presiding Wo Oe ee ke eke om me ok Nr IN THE SUPERIOR CouURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 thursday, August 13, 1953 (Wa. STIR NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRD IREDELL COUNTY Paul Gilbert et al as Deacons and Trustees of the First Presbyterian Church, Statesville, North Carolina Plaintiffs JUDGMENT VSe City of Statesville Defendant ooo oOo Oo OOO OO This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge of the Superior Court, holding the courts in the Fifteenth Judicial District in Concord, North Carolina; and it appearing to the Court that on the 10th day of Ay. gust, 1954, a temporary restraining order was signed by dis Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge of the Superior Court, in Statesville, North Carolina, on the petition of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendant, and any of its employees from tearing down the old stone wall around tne Fourth Creek Memorial Burying Ground or from re moving any of the Shruboery in said burying ground or from, in any other way, molest ing the ourying ground area until the further order of the Court, and that said orde also directed that the City of Statesville show cause why such temporary restrainig order should not ve continued in Concord, North Carolina, at :00 P. M., on the 2st Gay of August, 1954; and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel of record for both the plaintiffs and the defndant that the matters in controversy cetween the parties have oeen Settled as herein set forth with the express under > 14 o ao = ‘ Standing and agreement vetween the parties that none of the matters consented to erel Y y tne song herein by the plaintiffs Snell constitute any waiver of the conditions and restric tic { nS contained in the deea for the ourying ground to the City of Statesville, wut that Ss i S i j ; ' ame shall continue in full torce and effect, and th p ; : th ir ‘ 6 success rs, snall] have tne rj tht to rely upon same in a4 ' s except for the one concess‘on herein made by tne plaintiris, Now, the r bY cons , refore, by c nsent, it is hereby ordered, adjudsed and decreed that the plaint i ntiffs relinquish €@ll risnt and title which they might have as Deacons and fir c St Presoytorian Church, Statesville, North Carolina, in the - descrived portion of the Four the condition: Trustees of the lowing thc iptue of ‘| “reek Memorial Burying Ground by Vv a nd restrictions contained in the deed of conveyance by the Deacons the First Presbyter jan Church ville, North Carolin Iredell Coy and Trustees of » Statesville, to the City of — A » Tecorded in Deed 800k 111, pages 555, 556 and 557; in nty Registry; 8aid portion Of sa 4 , s as follows: ‘d burying ground being described The followin the intersection of tae. the corner n at S and Water Ste Pourth Creek Memorial Burying Ground, Beginning at reets and West End Avenue: , 5 at a int tt Creek Memorial p Point 105 feet (meas the Four ing into the semen Ground) East of heme along the old stone wall fF oper” tery on West Ena East edge of the most easterly 3 nd Avenu 90 degrees and having tof 8 C8 ® and extending in a northeasterly 4 rele, said a roxim the wal “ng &@ raduis of 40 #. re Ssubtend ing an angle of apP stb wall lying al ng North Woeting Streveet length, until a point of tangency * 8 reached, the point of tangency _— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TRM, 1953 Thursday, August 13th, 1953 th along the wall from the northeast corner of the cemetery wall as isting. The total linear feet of the wall, as it now exists, which feet Sou it 18 we eave’ being 63 feet, and at the midpoint of the are used to describe yill be @ ed new location of the wall; the total lateral movement of the wall | tae PPPOE’ ne ourying ground affected being 7 - 1/2 fect. and area 0 By consent, it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant, ¢ Statesville, make a proper determination as to the existence of graves City o “i above-described burying ground area; that the defendant, City of Statesville, ; in ta in making said determination, remove the soil in said area in layers under the super- yision of Mr. Paul Gilovert or Mr. John Gilbert of Gilbert Engineering Company of statesville, North Carolina, who are also members of tne Joard of Deacons of the ripgt Presbyterian Church, Statesville, North Carolina, and the Stetesville, North terolina, City Engineer; that if it should be determined by either of the Messrs. re] u)bert or the said City Engineer that graves do exist in the above-deecrivoed area, that the defendant, City of Statesville, shall comply with the existing law rela- tive to the removal of the said graves; that the defendant, City of Statesville, is to remove such remains as are found to another portion of ssid ourying er g@ ground or elsewhere as may be mutually agreed by Soth parties if no place is aveilable ‘n sald burying ground and re-inter the remains in a proper manner; it is by consent further ordered, adjud;ed and decreed that the portion of the stone wall which is moved o@ reouilt by the City in a good and workmanlike sanner so that same is in me same Condition as the same now is, or as close to same condition as said wall van 0@ rebuilt; that the rebuilt wall be rebuilt so as to retain, so far as possi- 8 +20 » the same symmetry as the wall now has; that the shruovery in said area be wved by the City to another location in said burying ground in a proper and care- ful manner; It is, by consent, further ordered, adjudged and decreed thst the restraining Mer of August 10, 1953, be, and the same is, hereby dissolved, and the City ‘s “reby taxed with the costs of this action. This 25th day of August, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge holding Courts In Fifteenth Judicial District Consented to: Wi, a Warg Jr. t ‘‘orney or A ET 3 Saxter H, elendan ecertenesneanannan te —_ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1953 Thursday, August 13th, 1953 ‘No. 5274 Daniel Lazenby vs Roxie Shives Lazenby ------------.-_____ Continued 1 | “lo. 5020 Vance McBride vs William M Herrin -------..- ee Cont inued ie! TH} lo. 5395. Are Ray Electric Corp vs Oscar R Mills T/A Mills Elec Shop-Contimm: Hf ‘No. 5422 LC Miller vs A Banks Culp --------------------------2-22. Conti nued STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE IN CHANCERY M0. 5526 _— i OHNSON PR BERTIE J Petitione, Chancery No. U-423 ie F, of Gs No. 479 PRUITT ROWAN Respondent. ! DISCONTINUANCE TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT: Please discontinue the above entitled cause for the reéson that the respondent, ROWAN PRUITT, died on the 12th day of May, A. D. 1953 at Mooresville, North Carolina, and pray that this cause be dismissed. GERALD K. O'BRIEN Prosecuting Attorney Joseph L. Bannigan Joseph L, Bannigan Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Dated: July 23, 1953 Detroit, Michigan ee ee ee ee ee “Wo. 5410 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County irs. Clyde M, Holcomb, Executrix of ! - F. Holcomb, deceased Plaintiff ! -Vs- | JUDGMENT Charles Baily Ree P Nirs Clyde se and Paul Reese, ! ae “. Holcomb, indi and Clyde Y. Holcomb. » individually Defendant i THIS ¢ S CAUSE Coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable 6G, 3 . mith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing © the Co, Curt frou the statement of Counsel for both parties that all matters of Con ‘roversy set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, 8nd that the Defendants have agreed to pay to the Plaintiff, and the Pla ntiff hag agreed to “cept, the sum ofTwo Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) and the costs of this action, fon in full accord and satisfaction thereof; 10W th me pmerefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the MRSS have ans pe © 4nd recover of the Vefendants, the sum of Two Thousand Dollars '¥5900 00) and the a . . “~ ©908ts of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. hig 2 end day of September, 1953. C, G, Smith " Vlerk of the oupetior Court rr | Consent: Lewis, Lewis, & Simons By: J. 4, Lewis Attorneys for Plantiff Scott, Collier, & Nash By: R, A, Jollier Attorneys for Defemants. Mrs. vlyde M, Holcomb , individually and Clyde V. Holcomb Fred G, Chamblee Fred U, Uhamblee, Attorney for Defendants, Charles Baily Reese and Paul Reese MM OK KK ak Ko oe ok oe oo No. 5454 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Poul M. Reese Plaintiff -vs- J i ; JUDGMENT -lyde V. Holcomb and “rs. viyde hk. Holcomb (Mrs. S.F. Holcomb) { nad Lumbermens lutual ¢ Sualty Co, lefendants — | THIS CAUSE comine on : heard and i j H ’ Oming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable °. &, ey ith, the cle k of the Su serior Cour o TO. ~ ° perior vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the -ourt from tl statement . , from the statement of ‘ounsel for both parties that all matters of contro versy set out is 1e433 ; } y L€a Aingfs idVe I een arre ed upon } y the parties, ind that naants have arreed t ACCer 9) { Plai i : ed to accept and the -iaintiff has agreed to pay the costs of this action in full accord and Satisfaction thereof; NOW, the refore hy . : , a SY Consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Plaintiff a the coste oh 2 7 y ‘ne costs of this action to be taxed by the Jlerk, in full accord am satisfaction of al} Claims in t iis cause, This 2nd day of September, 1953. C. G, Smith —_— CONSENT Vierk of the Supa@ior Vourt Fred 4, Chamblee Fred G. Chamblee Attorney for Plaintiff Lewis, Lewis, & Simons + J. G, Lewis attorneys for defend renee Mrs. S$. . Holcomb and? Viyde V, Holcomb Scott, Collier, & } » ~ Nasn BY: Bs A. Coljien Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward Attorneys for Yo ~~ a. S. F Holsonb ates By: _Wm I, Ward, Jr, Clyde V. Holcom) Attorneys for defendant Subrogee, umbermens Mutual Casualty Company * xc Moe me me me xe 5568 IREDELL COUNTY Price S. Brawley, L. P. Young, et als x . ORDER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT vs The Town of Mooresville, N. C. et als * This cause com ng on to be heard, and being heard pursuant to a temporary restraining order entered in this cause by his Honor J. C, Rudisill, a Judge of the Superior Court, said order being returnable before the undersigned Judge Presiding and holding Courts for the Fifteenth Judicial District; and it appearing to the Court that all matters and things in controversy between the parties upon which the temporary restraining order was based have been compromised and settled and that the parties plaintiff on behalf of themselves desire to take a nonsuit and agree that the temporary restraining order be dissolved; and it further appearing that no other persons in a similar situation was the plaintiffs have come in and made themselves parties or asked to be heard: It is therefore, by consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the temporary restraining order issued herein on the 15th day of July, 1953 be and the same is hereby dissolved and declared to be of no further force and effect, If is further ordered, adjudged and decreed, by consent, that the costs of this action be taxed against the defendant, Town of Mooresville. This the 27th day of August, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr. udge Pres ng and holding Courtof the Fifteenth Judicial District By consent of: WR, Battley and w. I, Ward, Jr Sy: We R, Battle Kitorneys for P aint s By: Z. V, Turlington Kttorney for Defendants a a a 72 No. 815-T UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OFPNORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE CIVIL NO. 235 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Vs. i DEFAULT JUDGMENT J. R. BROWN ! Iredell County, N. C, Rt. 2, Cleveland ! This cquse coming on to be heard upon motion of James M, Baley, Jr., United States Attorney, and it appearing to the Court that complaint was filed and summons issued on April 6, 1953, and served upon the defendant by the United States Marshal for this District by delivering a copy of said summons and complaint to the defendant on April 17, 1953; that no answer or other plea has been filed by thedefendant and no appearance entered by him or anyone on his behalf; that this action is brought upon unpaid premiums due on a 1946- 1947 cotton crop insurance contract and 1946-1947 wheat crop insurance contract, and the amount due thereon is definite and certain; that the time for filing answer has expired and the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for; the Court so finds the facts to be. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, the United States of America, have and recover of the defendant, J. R. Brown, the sum of $262.72 together with interest at the rate of one-half of one per cent for each calendar month or fraction thereof on the sum of $17.30 from J il pai une 30, 1946, until paid; on the sum of 525.41 from June 30, 1947, until paid; on the sum of $48.33 from August 31, 1946, until paid; and on the sum of $162.41 f . rom September 30, 1947, until paid; and that the costs of the action be taxed arainst the defendant by the Clerk of this Court The Clerk of this Court will certify a transcri pt of this judgment for docketing in tt @ office of the Clerk of Sunrerior Co urt of Iredell County, North Carolina, This lst day of September, 1953 —/s/ E. Y, Webb U. S. District Judge «eR RER EH He Hm Ao. 5410 r . yortH CAROLINA NO. 379 agian «noe COURT Iredell County Wes, Clyde M. Holcomb, cutrix of 9. f- are Deceased. ‘ JUDGMENT cartes pea Ciyde Me folcomb, Individually, and Clyde V. Holcomb This cause came on to be docketed upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court of Jredell Vounty: = wiereupon it having been made to apoear to the Court that the matters in controversy eve been settled and that it is desired that the appeal be withdrawn It is adered and adjudged that the appeal be and the same is hereby jismissed and that it be so certified to the said Superior Court of Iredell vounty to the intent that the proceedings be had therein in said cause according to law And it is considered and adjudged further, that the Defendants, Mrs. vlyde M, Holcomb, Individually, and Clyde V. Holcomb and surety to the apveal tond Rachel K, Lewis, do pey the costs a the appeal in this Vourt incurred, ‘orndt, the sum of Two and 70/100 dollars ($2.70) and execution issue therefor. Adrian vv, Newton Glerk of the Supreme Vourt. A True Copy: (SEAL) * eRe KKK Ke KK Ke ke oe ie ee ete, a. apapee Sea ~ ge MNo. 5573 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Orders Mattress Company, Inc., a South Carolina corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT Klutz-Schafer Furniture Company, Inc., ! | , 4 ! Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this llth day of September, on motion of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: ale That on July 28, 1953, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. alte That summons was issued from this Court on July 31, 1953, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. -3- That the summons was served on the defendant by W. C. Jenkins, Deputy “heriff of Iredell County, on July 31, 1953, by leaving with the defendant a4 copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. a T. . Ka ; That the tine for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. -5- That t t te verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain oney d y due for merchandise so]q and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of ¢ in m nelefendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that 4m verified Statement, marked "Exhibit A" &@ part of the complaint itemized » Was attached to, and made » Which Statement set forth the merchandise purchase, the date of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all dits arising out of th debits and cre © transaction, verified statement attache » 4nd marked “Exhtbit A", thet -” On account of the sale and delivery of the ise shown in the plaintiff's statement marked "Exhibit A", together with t thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 3lst day of October, interes til paid, on One Thousand Forty-Seven Dollars and Thirty-Three Cents, Ce ($1,047+33)» | IT IS THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the ’ jaintiff recover from the defendant, Klutz-Schafer Furniture Company, Inc., plain of One Thousand Forty-Seven Dollars and Thirty-Three Cents, ($1,047.33) the sum ' ether with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the tog 31st day of October 1952, until paid, together with costs of this action taxed by the Court. This the 11 day of September, 1953. C. G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court of IredellCounty. INo. 5596 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT COUNTY OF IREDELL BEFORE THE CLERK E. M. LOWRANCE AND WIFE, SARAH A. LOWRANCE, PLAINTIFFS vs ROWAN INVESTIENT COMPANY, a Corporation, KETNER'S, INCOR- PORATED, a Corporation and BARGER CONSTRUCTION CO!PANY, a Corporation, DEFENDANTS This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable @. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the Statement of the Attorneys for Plaintiffs and defendants that the matters and things in controversy !s ve been settled between the parties and that the plaintiffs have elected to take a nonsuit in their ection; IT IS, THEREFORE, upon motion of Messrs. Grant Bolmer and W. R. Battley, Attorneys for plaintiffs, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs be and they are hereby non- suited and taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 24 day of September, 1953, C. G. Smith erk of the Superior Conrt d Iredell County, North Carolina a ee a ee Mo. 560 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ers Hayes Bula My Plaintiff oe ORDER G, Hayes Willies befendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District, upon the mot ion of the plaintiff, Eula Myers Hayes, for temporary alimony and subsistence for herself and two minor children during the pendency of this action, and for reasonable attorney's fees; and it appearing to the Court that the allegations contained in the complaint which is also taken as m affidavit in this cause make out a prima facie case for alimony without divoree under the provisions of G. S. 50-16 and that the plaintiff is emtitled to alimony and subsistence for herself and her two minor children pending the trial of this action and its final detirmination; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is reasonably able to pay the sum of $75.00 per month to the plaintiff for the support or herself and minor children; Now, therefore, it is ordered that the defendant pay to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County for the use of the plaintiff and her two minor children the sum of Seventy Five Dollars per month beginning with the ) day of October, 1953, and a like amount on the lst day in each and every month thereafter until the above action isfinally concluded; it is further the order of this Court that the plaintiff shall have the right to continue to reside in the homeplace where she now lives with her two minor children pending the final detirmination of this action; and the defendant shall pay to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County the sum of $50.00 on account, 4s Counsel fees for use of plaintiff's attorney. This 29 day of September, 1953. Frank M. Armstron Resident Judge Fifteenth Judicial District wR me me we eK ke Ke KK om Wo, 5510 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Laura H. Sherrill Plaintiff ) ) vs. ) JUDGMENT Walter S. Sherrill, Sr. ) ) Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina; and it appearing to the Court that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected to take a non-suit in this action; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the cost to be charged by the Vlerk; This the 2 day of October, 1953, 1953, CG. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court Consented to: Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward Isasc i. Ave Jr. Kttorneys for the Plaintiit7— Adams, Dearman & Winberry By C. B. Winber ttorneys for the Defe ant iain a i i a a No. 5618 ORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY c, Ae Troutman, Sr. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK JUDGMENT vs. Paul H. Troutman This cause coming on to be heard on the written statement signed and duly verified by the defendant, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant is justly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1912.50 for the reasons set out in the Cmfession of judgment. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is indebted to the defendant in the sum of $1912.50, and that the vlaintiff recover from the defendant the said sum of $1912.50, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of this judgment. This the 2nd day of October, 1953. CG, G, ith ‘ Clerk of Superior Court = 1) ii } } y 1 ts 2 6S ag IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR VOWUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN EQUITY. LAURA SHERRILL, ) Plaintiff, ) WS. ) EQUITY NO. 22,679 WALTER S. SHERKILL, SR., ) Defendant. ) FINAL DECREE This day this cause came on to be heard upon the Plaintiff's Bill Defendant's Answer, and the Report of the Special Examiner, and the Court having a ~ nsidered «a: > and now hea? yr a § } j , ily considered sane, and now being fully advised in the premises, upon considers tion thereof, it is; IRDERED, ADJUDGED DECRV"ED, as follows, to-wit: has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this cause € equities in this cause are with the Plaintiff, LAURA SHERPILL Je tnat the Plaintiff is a bona fide resident of the Stute of Florida, nas o€6n a oona fide re “© res.cent of the State of Florida for more than ninety(90) 2878 last past, immediately prior to the institution of this suit for divorce. ' at tue Pl U-f", LAURA SIERRILL, be and she is hereby, awarded 8 livorce, a vinculo matrimonii, according to the laws of the State of Florida in such cases made and provided, from the Defend: nt, WALTER S. SHERRILL, Ske, and tht bonds of watrimony now existing between said :laintiff and said Defendant, be and they are hereby diss Y1lved. S mi + Je inawU the Flainttfe “9 0€ ana sne is hereby allowed to resume her maiden ii S ‘ER, and that t a, +} Hy, OG ar Une same is hannah. ah oS B80* restored to } er Oe That t . r o satel agreement entered tnt by and between the parties hereto, “™ the 2lst a iy of July, A “© De 1953, in the 4.) following words and figures, to-wit! eNORTH CA.OLINA, LXE DELL COUNTY, a SCREMENT ALD DEED OF SEPARATION NESE ARTICLES oF NT tp OF “\* AND DEED OF SEPARATION, Made and enter ° this the 21st day of July 1953 ’ ’ ee a 9etween Walter S. Sherrill, Sr+» of ae sounty N fin | > rsa Carolina, hereinafter called the party of the fir# part, and Laura Sherrij} : ’ of Volusia County, State of Florida, hereim after called the ne 1 the Party of the S@cond part WiTNESSETH That whereas, w ee i Mi » Walter S. Sheori 11, Sr., and Laura Sherrill, the partis hereto, intermarri eq on tr i ve € llth day of January, 194.7, and ever since h# been and now are, 30th day of anc as such lived together untd “arch, 19543 in Equity, lo she @ Plaintiff's said former name of Laura 5 ' ed i as, the material differences and conditions which have arisen sit taposeible for the said Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., and Laura Sher- nm to continue to live together as man and wife; a whereas, the said Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., and Laura Sherrill sep- arated on the 30th day of March, 1954, and are now living separate and om each other; Tee evens, no children were born to the marriage union betwem the parties hereto; And whereas, & reconciliation vetween the parties is impossible, and they cannot g0 back and live together as man and wife; And whereas, there is now pending an action brought by the said Laura Sherrill for an absolute divorce from Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., said action having been instituted on July 2, 1953, in tne Circuit Court, Seventh Judi- cial Circuit, in and for Volusia County, Florida, Equity Number 22,679, and being entitled, “Laura Sherrill, Plaintiff, Vs. Walter S, Sherrill, Sr., Defendant's And whereas, the parties hereto, moved by good and adequate reasons, and verily believing that they can no longer live togetner as husband and wife, and that it is for their best interest to live separate and a- part, have, therefore, mutually agreed that the separation between them now existing shall continue, and nave mutually agreed to enter into this Agreement anc Deed of Separation and property settlement, as follows: NOW, THEXEPOVCE, In consideration of the premises, and the further stip- ulations, agreements and covenants hereinafter contained, the party of the first part and the party of the second part do ereby mutually agree and contract with each other, as follows: FIRST: The separation now existing between the parties shall nv.nuey and henceforth the said Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., and Laura Sherrill siall Continue to live separate and apart from each other, as fully and to all intents and purposes as if said oomds of matrimony did not exist between them, and that in the future, each shall contract and be contracted with, individually and independently of the other, as fully and to all intents and purposes as if they had never been married. SECOND: That Walter Ss. Sherrill, Sr., is to pay the sum of Two hundred Fifty-nine bollars Fifty Cents ($259.50) to and for the use and senefit of Laura Sherr‘1l, upon her executing the ceeds hereinaiter referred to, tis Separation agreement, and obtaining and furnishing his Attorney with a Certified Copy of a divorce decree showing a final and absolute divorce, and te nd take a nonsuit in the action now pending in Iredell County for ali- wry; that Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., has deposited the sum of Two Hundred F ‘ . ifty-nine Dollars Fifty Cents ($259.50) with C. 3. Winverry, Attorney for Walter .. rill Snerrill, Sr. and I, “4. Avery, Jr., Attorney for Laura Sher- ’ Soth of Statesville, North Carolina, and when C. 3. Winberry, Attor- "ey for Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., is furnished the deed to Charlie Fay Mur- mm hereinafter referred to, properly executed and acknowledged by Laura She S "rill, this separation agreement executed in duplicate by Laura Sherrill i 2 esse and properly acknowledged by her, and a certified copy of a divorce deere é in a suit now pending showing a final and absolute divorce, and @ Non-sui; 8 is taken in the case now pending in Iredell County and a Certified Copy of that decree furnished, and upon C. B. Winberry, Attorney, finding that al] of the aforesaid instruments are properly executed and acknowledged, the said C, B. Winverry and I, I, Avery, Jr., are to turn over ang disburse tie sum of lwo hundred Fifty-nine Dollars Fifty Cents ($259.50) as follows: 1. To I. 4. Avery, Jr., the sum of Fifty-nine Dollars Fitty Cents ($59.50) oN), 2. To Harry A. Horn and Louis Ossinsky, Sr. 11 Main Street, Peninsula Station, Daytona Beach, Florida, attorneys for Laura Sherrill, and Ley c. Sherrill, the sum of Two aundred Dollars ($200.00), THIRD: That Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., is to have and ow adsolutely and in fee simple, free and clear of all right, title, claim, interest and es tate of Laura Sherrill, the following described personal oroperty}; 1. ‘he 1950 Dodze automobile which is owned by him and is in his poss- ession in lredell County, North Carolina. ee All of tne househole and kitshen furniture whicn is now situate at the some in Iredell County, North Carolina, where said parties heretofore lived, and all other personal property of any and every kind in the home anc on seid premises, de All money which the said Walter S. sherrill, Sr., has. 4e Any anc all osnk accounts in the name of Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., and ar nd all conds, stocks and other personel property in the name of vmed by him. Sereoy releases and relinquishes all right, title, inte S, Or may have !n the above descrived personal roperty, unto +} a? ts . ‘ — d dis- P ve Unto the said Walter 5S, Sherrill, Sr., to be held, owned anc ana without the consent or joinder of Laur : ny v "ao . ’ hi o ~S no personal property in Iredell County now to which claims any ri sat, title, interest, ownership or estate therein, POURTH: 7} Laura 3} ; the nat LAUYrA sherril) is to lave, own and hold in fee g imple ul following descrived pers mal roper ty: l. All If the f tae ws S9Usehold and kitchen furniture which she removed from arti 26 . » . in pare €s hereto a few weeks after tne separation between ~ S not now in lredell Vounty. all money which Laure Sherrill has. 40 ANY and al] 3a a i r 1 vank accounts snd deposits, bonds, and stocks me" lame of Laura Sherrill Walter Se Sherrt] 9 ii, “Te, hereby releases and relinquishes unto sill title, iol the above described pe Sherrill al rie ght ’ interest md estate that he has, or may hav ) r rsona] Property, with the right to hold, ow me f the same in fee simple. pose 0 FIFTH; hat tue real estate hereinafter descvived in this paragraph is owned by Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., and the title t» the same is in Wal- 3 ter S Sherrill, Sr., the same being described as follows: e . Lying and veing in Statesville Township, Iredell County, North Cav ylina, wil varticuler ly described as follows: FIRST THACT: Beginning at an iron pin on the East side of Park Drive tension, Marlow's Southwest corner, and which iron pin is South 18 de- - West a distance of 600 feet from an iron pin in the Southeast inter- oiiien of the old Hickory road, and Park Drive Extension, and rum ing rons with the East side of Park Drive Extension, South 18 degrees West 130 feet to an iron stake on the North side of a new road; thence with the North side of said new road, South 77 degrees 30 minutes Kast 400 fect to an iron stake in Younger's line; thence with Younger's line, North 18 de- grees East 130 feet to an iron stake in Younger's line, and oeing Marlow's corner; thence with Marlow's Southern line, North 77 degrees 40 minutes Bast 400 feet to the beginning, and veing the identical lot of land con- veyed to William W. Lindley and wife, Ruby M. Lindley, by the deed of Paris W. Danyels and wife, Kathleen Danyels, recorded in Deed Book 181, nage 113, Iredell County Registry, and veing the identical land conveyed to — Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., by the deed of William W. Lindley and wife, ‘uby M. Lindley, recorded in Deed Book 19h, page 298, Iredell Cour ty Registry. SECOND TRACT: Beginning at an iron stake, N. J. Younger's corner on Park Drive Extension, and running thence with the Last side of Park Drive Extension South 16 West 100 feet to a stake, Linley's corner; thence South 72 East 300 feet to a stake; thence North 16 East 100 feet bo a stoke, lie J Younger's corner; thence with N. J. Younger's line North 72 est 300 to the deginninz, and being the same lot of land conveyed b ward D,. ! low and wife, Neta Marlow, to A. C. Younger by deed bearing date of Set- tember 19, 191:7. For further reference see deed of A. C. Younger and wife Larry Flizae beth Younger, to Ralph W. Hutto and wife, Jettie 3. hu to, dated Septemoer 22, 1947, and recorded in Deed Book 19k, page 205, and oseing the identical land conveyed to W. S. Sherrill by the deed of Ralph W. Hutto and wife, Jettle B, hutto, recorded in Deed ook 227, pase 4, Iredell County, Kesis- try. The parties hereto agree that tne aoove described real estate is to be the property of Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., in fee sivple, and to be held, omed, mortgased, conveyed and disposed of by him in fee simple, free and Clear of all ri ght, title, interest and estate of the said Laura Sherrill therein, including her dower right, and the said Laura Sherrill does here- by release, relinquish, transfer, assign and convey unto Walter S. Sher- rill, Sr., all her right, title, interest and estate in and to the avove descrived rea) estate, and does hereby release the same from any ard all Claims for dower, alimony, maintenance, support, or other payments or interests, and from any and all claims that may arise by reason of the marital relationship or in eny action arising on account of the marital r *lationsnip, the separation hereinabove referred to, any prior separa- ti 4 “ °M, or this Separation agreement; that Laura Sherrill azrees to and with Wa , 4 iter s, “nerrill, Sr., his heirs, executors, administrators and assims, and any person, firm or corporation owning or holding the above descrived land, or “ny part thereof or any interest therein by deed, mortgage or oth Wise, that she will without any compensation, execute such other and furt her deeds, instruments and paners as are necessary for said property to b * med by Walter S$, Sherrill, Sr., his heirs, executors, administra- tors nd assigns in fee simple, free and clear from the dower and all a ee 7 4 ig * other right, title, interest, claim and estate that Laura Sherr i]} Now he § or may hereafter have by reason of the marital relationship or the separs tion. SIXTH: That the title to the following described real estate ig tn Wal ter S. Sherrill, Sr., and wife, Laura Sherrill, as an estate by to-wit: Lying and oeing in Statesville Township, Iredell, County, North Caroling and particularly descrived as follows: ’ Beginning at an iron stake on the South margin of Younger Avenue, Fox's Northeast corner, and running thence with Fox's line South 17 degrees ang 30 minutes West 200 feet, more or less, to Walter Redmon's line; thence with Redmon's line South 87 East 75 feet to a stake on Redronts line, A. ¢, Younger's (a new) corner; thence with Younger's line North 16 C degrees and 40 minutes ‘jest 200 feet, more or less, to a stake on the South margin of Younger Avenue; thence with the South margin of said avenue, North 77 West 75 feet to the veginning, and ocing the identical land conveyed to W, s, Sherrill, Sr., and wife, Laura Sherrill, by the deed of A. CG. Younger and wife, Larry Slizaveth Younger, recorded in Deed Book 233, page 4313, Irede}! County Kegistry. That the parties hereto agree that tne above descr ioed property is to x6 owned in lee sim; le oy walter S. Sherrill, or., free and clear of the dower right and all claim, ri “at, title, interest and estate of Laura Sherrill, anc to that end and for that purpose the parties hereto agree to executes deed conveying tue avove Gescrived property to Charlie Fay Murdock, and to have her execute a deed si nultaneously tnerewith conveying the above de- Scrived property to Walter Ss, Sherrill, Sr.; that Laura Sherrill does here oy transfer, assim, and convey unto Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., his heirs ea ssic ’ : * . 3)) asengns, tae above descrived property in fee simple, free and clear from ll dower right and a 1 riot st, title, claim, interest and estate in said pro perty arising by virtue of tne deed having been made as an estate by the entirety, and arising by virtue of tre marital relationship, the separé ‘ion, or anything growing out of the same, so that the same can oe held and owned by Walter s, v~herrill, Sr., his heirs, and assigns in fee simple ene mortgaged, conveyed, sold and disposed of vy walter S. Sherrill, 5! ‘n fee simple without the Joinder and consent of Laura Sherrill; that La Sherrill agrees that she will without any compensation, execute such fur ther and other instruments, deeds and papers as are necessar, to carry ” and provisions ni CT tewrm ny wy SLVENTY® inat “alter Se the agreements rein contained t ontained. ~herrill, “re, party of tne first part, in Considerct , ton of the mutual stipulations and agreements herein contained, and the pro 3 : perty and Senefits moving to him hereunder, does hereby poles all ri sit, title, interest and es: nave i “ate that he now nas, or might ever n any real e ‘ “ Stave or personal property now or hereafter owned by Lauré Ss lerril) and a , ’ “88 hereby release the person and the property of Laure Sherrill now owned, or he rea fter acouired for any and all claims, right®y interests and eg “ates, action may hi S and causes of actions thet he now has . er r 2y? Whe y reafter have sPOwing out Of the mar — ' riage relationship betwe Parties op this Separation the entirety, RIGHTH: ‘That Laura Sherrill, party of the second part, in consideration j the mutual stipulations and agreements herein, and the oroperty and money of : ing to her under this agreement, does hereby release all right, title, in- i mov terest and estate that she now has, or may hereafter have in any real or ere sie w owned or hereafter acquired by Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., and does per sonal no nereby release tne said Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., his person and his property e from any and all claims, rights, actions and causes of actions tact she now im | 2 has or may hereafter have for alimony, maintenance or support growing out of the marriage relationship or this separation, snd does hereby release and discharge Walter S. Sherrill, Sr. his person and his property, from any and all claims, rights, interests, actions and causes of actions thst she now has or may hereafter have on account of the marriage relationship v,etwen the ai u parties, or srowing out of the separation agreement; that it is fully uncder- stood and agreed tnat Walter 5. Sherrill, Sr., nor his property, now owned or : tn fl ,* yn ‘ ‘ . yrnt) ' ey hereafter acquired, shall in any way be liable for alimony for Laura Sherrill, or for maintenance and support for Laura she vill, and tist a f211 and com. : sa - . : . » mane a he plete settlement of all matters and tunings growing out of tne marri 1 tionship or this separation have been, 2nd are now fully and completely ii settled. ir NINTH: The carty of the first part hereby covenants anid ozrees t e 4 will not, at any time, contract any debt, cnarge or liaocility whatsve ’ i for which the purty of the sec.md part, or her property or estate y 2e@= Hi! come personally lisvle or answerable. TENTH: The party of the second part hereby covenants and agrees tht she will not, at any time, contract any debt or debts, charge or lis»vility what- Soever, for which the party of the first part, or nis property or estate may ) Secome personally leaiole or answerable. | Ww ai * ty + « < a ayt 7 a EIEVENTH: That Leura Sherrill herevy releases Walter S. Sherrill, “rey c - : : + ty ury her C- his person and property, voth real and personal, now owned or hereafter ac Wred, from any and all claims for alimony, sup ort and ma'tnterance by % . : 2 awd s 1} h raiter 8. wherrijl, sr., for herself, and hereoy releases and relinquishes q : nA 7 r which Ml dower rizhts, pr sperty rights, and all and every property rigat w she now nas, or may hereafter have, in and to his real and 0 ‘sonal or Pe Te- ty, and all ri rhts of every kina trowings out af the m rital relation w ich 8 rh o S } he now has, or may hereafter have asainst tne person of Walter 5S. sherrill, Sr, , , y fe sd » @nd against his property, ooth real and personal, now owned or here a ‘ - ter acquired, and furtrer releases all and every right of action against t e : Ne person and property of Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., that she has, might or Cou : ‘ f = 1d have by reason of the marriage bond, this separation, or any separa Vion her ®tofore made, or any causes of action arising out of the same. TWELFTH: That Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., on his part, hereby releases Lau "8 Sherrill, her person and property, both real and personal, now owned or bh Sreafter ‘cquired, of all and every right of courtesy, and 211 and every property right, in her real and personal property, or 8Zainst hep ’ which he now has, or might hereafter acquire, in any property, rea) and pér. sonal, now ommed or hereafter acquired, and all rights of every kind groy: 8 ang out of the marital relation which he now has or may hereafter ave, ageing her property, ooth real and personal, now owned or hereafter acquired by uer, and further releases all and every rigat of action against the Proper. ty and person oi Laura Snerrill tnat he nas, might or could Have, by reason of the marriaze bonds, this separation, or any separation heretofore made, or any cause of sction arising out of the same. THIRTEENTHsS Th each of the parties to this agreement, from ana after the date of this agreenent, shall hold, use, enjoy and dispose of his op i: Separate estate, indenendent of and free from the otner, ooth as to real sy: personal property now owned and as to the real and personal property heres. ver acquired, and each may contract and be contracted with, purchase, sell, mortsate, convey, will, or otnerwise dispose of his or ner property, real and personal, now owned or hereafter acquired, independent of the other, si without the joinder, er ent, written or oral, of the other, to the full vue future, as if the Inter-marriage between taem had nev POURTEENTHs It is the understandins, azreement and covenant on the part of eacn ot the parties ® uereto that in the sale, mortgage, transfer and conv} ance of any nronerty hereafter, whether real or personal, that it is mt necessary in order for the crantee to have a good title that the other pry mereto shall sisn and execute the deed of conveyance, mortgage, deed of tris ° t ] f sale sel . 2K ; . ’ mt r bill of sale selling or cor veying said property, it oveing the agreement, understanding, intention and covenant of tne parties hereto that in tht ™ >t tne parties hereto has forever released and discharged the property of the e . r other from all Claims, interest and estates on his or fe part, and that each shall ve in the same position as if such party were Sinzle and unmarried, and as hereé- if the intermarriage between the parties to had never ta) ais sate o the en place. However, it is agreed and covenanted between parties ne ‘ pees reto, and each party for himself and herself, covenants and 9% with the other ana ws estes “SP and with any and all persons, firm or corporations inter’ herein, or wi ; , wio may hereafter cecome interested herein, or in any property, real or perso: 41 Of the parties hereto, aot now owned or hereafter acqui that each sha 11 and will at any time or times hereafter make, execute deliver an, q ¥Y 8nd all such further and other instruments and assurances either of the said part ne tee hereto, or any person, firm or corporation } terested herein Or who gor 1 may hereafter become interested herein shall re 80lyY requir -/ d Wire, for the purpose of giving full effect to these presents to the covenants, r out Provisions and agreements hereof, and will do 8° with any further consid eration Passing to the said party. VIPTBEN TH To tne true ana faitnful performance of alj bus axrecments nerein contained, the party of the first part and the party of the second part do bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, each to the other. SIXTEENTH: That these Articles of Agreement and Deed of Separation shall be executed in duplicate, the original of which shall oe delivered to the —_—e part, and the duplicate original to the party of the se- cond part. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., and Laure Sherrill i) have mutually executed these presents in duplicate, under their respective bands and seals, the day and year first above written. Walter S. Sherri Walter S. Sherrt1 Laura Sherrill (SrAL) Laura Sherrill STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF VOLTISIA. I, Thomas A. Koehler, a duly qualified and actinz Justice of the Peace in and for Volusia County, State of Florida, do hereby certify that Laura Sherrill, wife of Walter S. Sherrill, Sr., personally appesred before me this day anc acknowledsed the due execution of the foregoing Deed of Separa- tion for the purposes therein expreseed. And I do further certify that it has been made to appear to my satisfaction, and I do find as a fact, that the same is not unreasonable or injurious to the said Laura Sherrill, wife of Walter S. S$ 1errill, Sr. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this the 19th day of August, 1953. Thomas A. Koehler (SEAL) Justice of the Peace in and for Volusia County, State of Florida. IF JUSTICE o; SEAL. 1 44s FACE HAS OFFICIAL 9 Oh MUST IMPKINT IT HERE STATE OF FL) TDA COUNTY OF VOLUSIA. I, Jess Mathas, Clerk of theCireuit Court, Seventy Judicial Circuit, in and for Volusia County, State of Florida, tne same being a Court of record, 40 hereby certify taat Thomas A. Koehler, the Justice of the Peace signing whe foregoing certificate, was at the time of signing the foregoing certi- fleate an acting Justice of the Peace in and for the county of Volusia, State of Florida, Wit ing, and that his signature taereto is in his own proper hand IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 hereunto set my hand and official seal, this 19th day of August, 1953. Jess Mathas ; Clerk of the circuit Court, Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Volusia County, State of Florida. oe eharen (SEAL) CLERK MUST PUT HIS OFFICIAL SFAL HERE. NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. I, Monroe Adams, a Notary Public of Iredell County, North Carolin 8, do hereby certify that walter S. »oherrill, Sr., personally appeareg befor " ~ € me this day, and acknowledged tne due execution of the foregoing Agreement and Dedd of Seraration for the purposes therein expressed, » my nana anc official seal, this the 27th day of August, 19% ’ 7 )je MONROE ADAMS | Notary Fuolie ~ 7 (Ss AL) iy commission expires: 2-25=55" | se and the same is nereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and the parties lereto a erevy orderec and directed to confirm to and comply with eaca and ever ‘ 7 of é€ terms Cc tions of said Stipulation. Te t Court retains jurisdiction oi this cause to enforce all tue ! 2° MS, C s a visions of the Asreement which is set forth in full hereir ind made a part of this Fi al Decree, ) CURDED. f DONE yt - -~ TITTy: : th . . . | ay ‘9 BOVIS) ANY DECREED in Chambers at HOLLY KILL, Florida, t this 1 th AA. I1 weptemoer, Me We 19546 i P. Be REV=ELS Hi CiIRCUIT JUDGE. Vy 4 IN CIRCUIT COURT | t : of the bi} SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT i be | in and for . I H | VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA I, Jess tuas, C? i, Ss ui Clerk o e s : hat ve ft . ; »f the avove styled Court do hereby cartify that ih | foresoing is a true and corre PRRILL ie | SOPPCCE Copy of FINAL DECREE in the case of LAURA Sd=kke ti Wee WALEER S. SHENR ILL, ©R., Chance N -" \ \ : y weancery No. 22,679 as the same arpears of reco wie viencery Order Book 14 p . =| hy Page 130, Public Records of Volusia County, Florida NITNESS MY hand ana nls Official seal at DeLand, Volusia County, Florida, “ 17th day of Se tember, A. D 1954 *s ae JESS MATHAS, As Clerk Circuit Court, Volusia County, Florids By Evelyn Smith (SEAL) Deputy Clerk el xs a a oe a sss North Varolina In the Suprior Court Iredell County Hickory Paper Box Company, Inc., Plaintiff, cape ee ei aaae = vs. John E. Walton and Walter EF, ~ Miller, General partners trading as Tru-Weave Hosiery Company, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C, G. Smith, Vlerk of Suverior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgement against the defendants by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summone issued in this action on the 3rd day of August, 1953; And it further appearing to the vourt that said summons tovether with a copy of said complaint was served on the defendant, John ©, “alton on the 4th day of August, 1953 and on the defendant Walter E. miller on the 5th day of August, 1953; And it further a pearing to the vourt that no answer, demurrer or other pleadings has heen filed by either of the defendants and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has exnired; And it further a,»vearing to the vourt from the verified complaint and the itemized statement of account thereto attached and wade e part thereof, that the cause of action consists of the breach of an expressed contract to pay for goods sold and delivered by the vlaintiff to the defendants ae set forth in said itemized statement of account as alleged in said complaint and that there is now due A ; s : ° and owinr by the defendants to the plaintiff for said roods so sold and elivered, the sum of Five Hunired, Sixty-seven and 25/100 ($567.25) Dollars t 92 . ‘s ) " ) Orether with interest to October 15, 1953 in the amount of rifty-one and 17/10¢ (351,17) Vol) ars, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed tha the olaintiff have and recover of the defendants, the sum of Six Hundred, Lkighteen and 2/100 ($61 8.42) Dollars together with interest thereon from October 15, 1953 until Paid and the costs of this action, T his the 15th day of October, 1953. G, G, Smith : Ulerk Superior Vvourt a a a ae ee ee * Ke Mm me JNo. 5598 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cwRt IREDELL COUNTY Spencer McLaughlin, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Bryant G, Sherrill, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable Carl G, Smith, vlerk of Superior Vourt of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judement against the defendant by default and inquiry; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 3rd day of September, 1953; And it further appearing to the court that said summons, together with a copy of said complaint, were served on the defendant on the 16th day of September, 1953; And it. further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other plead'ng has been filed ny the defendant @nd no extension of time to file pleadines has been rranted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; It is, therefore, ordered, ad judged, ami decreed that the plaintiff have a © +) o ; . on recover jud-ment against the deendant for such damages as a jur may award, end that inouirv of the mount of such damages be executed at the next civil term of the Sunerior Court of Iredell vounty, before a jury to determine the amount of said damages, This the 20th day of Uctober, 1953, 6. G. Smith . — Vlerk of the Superior Vourt Mo. 5590 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY John Marlow, Plaintiff, vs Lewis Hager and wife, , Lewis Hager Mrs Defendants 1 { q JUDGMENT ( { This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable v.G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendants by default findings; And it appearing to the Vourt that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in tnis action on the 17th dav of Aurust, 1953, and that said summons together with a copy of the complaint was served on the defendants, and each of them, on the 22nd day of August, 1953; and it further appearing that this action is based upon a promissory note dated April 2lst, 1953, in the sum of $1500.00 and due n’nety days after the date thereof with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from maturity; And it further appearing to the Vourt that no answer, demurrer or other pleadings have been filed by the defendants and no extention of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time in which to file has expired; It is, ther fore, ordered, adjudged amd decreed that the plaintiff have and recover the sum of $1500.00 with interest thereon from the 2lst day of July, 1953 and the costs of this action. This the 2lst day of October, 1953. UC, G. Smith Clerk of Superior vourt eq sk -< a — | he Ms ws A : . d, adjudged, anddecreed that the laintiff have “No. 5564 ore, it is ordered, adj p . ow, theref of the defendants the sum of Seven Hundred Twenty Nine and 68/100 oer NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY and rec ($729 68) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 18th day of December, 195], Joyce Summers Goble, Plaintiff and the costs 0 f this action. Vs. ORDER This 3 day of November, 1953. UC. G, Smith Loy C. Goble, Defendant Clerk of the Sunorior court This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the Honorable Carl G, i oe oe ee ee ee ee mx me he Om Smith, “lerk of Iredell County Superior Court, upon plaintiff's Motion to remove . ‘ . Noe Slebd this action from Iredel! County to Alexander County, for the convenience of the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA A tee Oo BAL GUI plaintiff and the ends of justice would be promoted by ‘he change, and it IREDELL COUNTY apnearing from the plaintiff's motion that this is an uncontested action for an ‘ ile Re Compton, Trading as absolute divorce upon the ground of two years separation; Jonpton Electric vompany, Plaintiff It is now oriered that this action be removed for trial from Iredell JUDG , - VS. .. / I 4 as i 4 younty to the Superior Court of Alexander County, for trial. | «, ©, Goforth, Owner and LU, G. Smith +. J. Threatte, Vontractor, . _ fendante Clerk of the Superior Court velendants, Iredell County : a i ae This cause coming on to be heard before the ion IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Myers Tire § rvice, Inc, Plaintiff each of them, and it further appearing to t 7 vs. JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL nin the said ¢ € is based unon an entire and ind Lf ni : “. D. (Mack) Fox and the terms of whic e defendants agreed to pay the plaintiff ti Lorene G, fox, (Mrs. Mack Fox) i 21 96) Be F endant - Lefendants “e'9) Sivht tundred Thirty Four & 96/100 Dollars; thet the defendants " Thi “1 to the plaintiff as shown } y the statemmt thereof the sur af Six tundred 148 Cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, “lerk of ‘itty Fy / | f’ ndred seventy i | | ‘ifty Five \0/100 ($655.00) Vollars, leaving a balance Une Hundred o it he Sune Cou . j iperior Court of Irede)]} vounty, upon motion by the plaimiff for judgment Nine & 96/108 , i ine Die ; inne ta the 7 ne & 96/100 (v179.96) Dollars due to plaintiff; and it appearin —s apainst the defendants by dafault final: | ‘nd it a : ~ at the amount sued unon is an amount certain according to the terns ¢ ‘ pe i n ppearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons n eutire ¢ ind4 ends files on ak cies ware and indivisible contract between the plaintiff and the defendants; ss in 1S action on the l4th day of August, 1953; and 4 st, ; me it further appearinc . plaintiff's verified complaint And it further ap, fearing to the pearing to the Vourt from the plaintiff's i Court that said summons together with a copy thet o : wom th n 4 ; ‘ . i — ton 4% da 4 of siid complaint Wwe se: . . ¢ e Plaintifr, wi thin the time ner itted by law, nam ] y; the ) h i y a ; erved on the defendants on the 17th & 18th days of August, ‘ly, 1952. 5 iii 1953; , » filed a Notice of Claim against the property of th defendants being re nartin, 4nd it further p rticularly appearing to the described as follows: the ” “ Lots Nos, forty-one (41), Forty-Two (42), and forty-three (1,3) . the Repistew vor s-Sample Mrvperty, a map of which iskecorded in the —" © Dage 138 o rhe eds for Iredell County, orth Carolina, in Plat oer tea. “*TOling | the records of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, Nor , ' eadi Court that no answer, demurrer, or other pl has been filed by the def by the defendante - en jants and no extension of time to file pleadings has . hin Wnich ple Eranted and t hat the time wit i adings may be filed has expired; nad it further annear: . Caring to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of act ; And 10nN Consiste 4° the breach occa it further apnearing to the Court that said action to enforce the ; ’ Pay a promissory note ‘n the srincip lien amount of Seven Hundreg 7 oT Was duly Comme ithin the ‘s >( we , : . imen > q (° Count Ww ‘ wenty Nine and 68/100 ($729.68) Dollars with interest 6 ced in the Superior Court of Iredell Ys thereon from the 18th day — Permitted by If De ) *Cember, 1951; law, namely, six months from the date of filing of said MS an = further appearing to the Court that no answer has been filed by the q : efen dants or either of them, that no motion or extension of time for Ra ee sitar ee | filing answer has been filed with the Clerk and no extension of time for filing i) answer has been granted by the Clerk and it further appearing to the Court that i time to file answer in the said cause expired on the 3lst day of January, 1953, H and that no answer has been filed in the said cause by the defendants, i Now, therefore, the olaintiff, through his attorneys, Land, Sowers, Avery « Ward, having moved for Judgement by Default Final for the sum certain sought f to be recovered in the said itemized and verified complaint and for the Clerk | to declare the said amount as lien upon the property described 4t is now, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed: 1. ‘that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants thie Sum of One iy findred Seventy-Nine & 96/100 ($179.96) Dollars, with interest thereon at the rite of six (6) per cent per annum from the 3lst day of Jamuary, 1953, until ! paid. | 2. ¢dnat the ssid judgment be ani the same is hereby declared to bea sien azainst tre said property described in the plaintiff's complaint and that f id ! } 9 + ar ' - pos a 4 | le gald | S said operty dates from the first day of lay, 1952, a aces os a © Q. oO ed + ry r - ‘ n> re ) io. s = _— ; oy vlerk of Superior Vourt in the complaint, he défendants entered into the indivisible No. 5602 ( yortH CAROLINA, In the Superior C ourt Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. A q.R, Archer, 1/ ure Food Store, Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT ‘ Vs. William J. Kiker and wife Ruby J. Kiker, Individuals, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the unders‘gned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 4th day of November, 1953, on motion of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for tke vlaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the vourt: adie That on September 10, 1953, the plaintiff filed a duly verified compleint inthe above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Surerior Court of Iredell County. o2e That summons was issued from this Court on September 10, 1953, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was retumable as provided by law. ~3< That the summons was served on the defendants by Bunch Redmond, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell county, on September 14, 1953, by leaving with the defendants ‘copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. a That the time for the defendants to answer was not extended, am the time allowed by law for the defendants to answer has now elapsed, end no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendants. -5e That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in money for merchandise sold to the defendants under the agreement of the tefendants to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized statement, marked "Eohi bit A", was attached to, and made a part of the complaint, which statement Set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price ’ % be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the "ransaction, : -6- hat, v the Court finds from the duly verified complaint ami the itemized Statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that the te. wee Se See { \ ee te SE ee ve a defendants are now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale of the Merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Two Hundred Ninety-One Dollars and Forty-Eight Cents ($291.48), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per gnnum from December 18, 1952, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, William J. Kiker and wife, Ruby J, Kiker, Individuals, the sum of Two Hundred Ninety-One Dollars and Fort y-Ei ght Cents, ($291.48), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cert per annum from December, 1952, until paid, together with costs of this action taxed hy the Vourt. This the 4th day of November, 1953. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. me x he oe me ok oe ook x OKO NO. 5607 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CWRT IREDELL COUNTY M. B. Steinberger, trading as | Statesville Salvage & Furniture tore, ! Plaintiff, j JUDGHENT vs. i Thaddeus Campbell ani wife, vatherine Campbell, | Vefendants, Thi m4 } *S Cause coming on to be heard ani being heard before the Honorable Os Us Smith . _ —_ ae i > » vlerk of Superior Court of lredell County, upon motion by the pbintiff for tud vuGpment against the defendants by default final; And it anpe ine , ; i] appearing to the vOurt that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued ; 8 issued in this action on the 17th day of September, 1953, and that at t he same > j me Cc im ch alr + i ery roc dai re j t t ute j ‘ ana deliy y ° ee n s were ns j t d whi summons and claim i and delivery Proceedinrs were served on the defendant Catherine Camnbell or t+ ‘ on the 1®th day of Yeptember, 1953, and the personal property describ af fs ' y ibed in the affidavit was taken by the Sheriff of Iredell 2ounty and put into th } Oo Une noses sj ossession of the plaintiff after holding t same for 3 days for th ys ior ne fend . . telendant to five undertaking as required by 7 which the said lefendant failed to qd do. 4 a r ere ,e an Or I q 3 n t t aft a7 d > } ec t P 2kt h da of I . e W s is sued 0 on ; for t he SSuar e of 7 a com ' , i Phaint and the said order and copy of the complaint were served on the lefendant iL, vatierine Campbell, on the 30th day of September 1953+ An ng has been filed by the defendant Catherine Campbell within the time pleadi allowed by law. 4 it further appearing to the Vourt that no answer, demurrer or other And it further appearing to the Court on the verified complaint that the jefendant Catherine Campbell is indebted to the plaintiff in the amount of one Hundred Fifty “ight & 44/100 ($158.44) Dollars. And it further eppearing to the Court in the verified c laint t the plaintiff is entitled to the possess-on of tne property desc in the said complaint ani affidavit and that the sa l ¢ exe as orovided for by law by certsin c onal s ec . ae morteare executed by the defendants, and that anci r 0 e olaintiff caused the issue of Claim and Delivery pacers for the gs: rty and that the deferdant Catherine Campbell was ‘rn possession of sar: at, the plaintiff is now in possession of the said property anc ( Catherine Camohell did not sive te replevy CQ. It is nov re ordere’, adjudsed i dec f nave and recov ef ant Catherine L ity ht & 44/100 (3158.41,) Dollars, int st t it per annum fy ite until this r i : int be declared entit to the pessesston of the caid property described in the complaint and that the same be sold as required by law in satisfactior he conetary Judgment herein rende red, “stherine Campbell the cost of this “his the 4th day of Nove er, and the plaintiff recover of the 3K action. 4 536 CG. G. Smith vierk Superior Vourt iefendant cr 233 ee ' ' ait /STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court qquts oF NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT nn ry COUNTY OF IREDELL, DO. NO. 1621 Hi STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA i gtite OF NORTH CAROLINA : | | Vs. QRDER v3. i ORDER | | NED DEVON MILLER ’ pNTEL MILLER I WHEREAS at the Iredell County Superior Court, November 3951 Tern, held WHEREAS at the November 1951 Term of Superior Court im the County as in Statesville, North Carolina, before the Hon. H. Hoyle Sink, Judge of Iredell, North Carolina, before the Hon. H. Hoyle Sink, Judge presiding, Presiding, the above-named defendant, Ned Devon Miller, entered a plea of guilty to the the above-named defendant, Daniel Miller, entered a plea of guilty to the 4 crime of breaking, entering and larceny, and crime of aiding and abetting in breaking, entering and larceny, and | WHEREAS it was the judgment of the Court that the defendant be sentenced WHEREAS it was the judgmet of the Court that the defendant be sentenced | . to two to three years in prison, which prison sentence was suspended and the te two to three years in prison, which prisom sentence was suspended and the | defendant placed on probation for a period of two years under the supervision defendant placed on probation for a period of two years under the supervision | t of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its officers with such condie of the North Carolina Probation Commissiom and its officers with such conditions | yl tions of probation being imposed as are set forth by Qtatute and the special of probation being imposed as are set forth by Statute and the special conditions a tell , i condition that defendant not prowl around at night, and that defendant not prowl around at night, and Uy xP i i ) | Hy ) = | WHEREAS it is now breught to the attention of the Court by a duly authorise WHEREAS it is now brought to the attention of the Court by a duly authe- of a a Probation Officer who is a sworn Officer of the Court that the said defendant, rised Probation Officer who is a sworn Officer of the Court that the said He | Mi Ned Devon Miller, has wilfully violated the terms and conditions of the Pro- defendant, Daniel Miller, has wilfully violated the terms ani conditions of the E ily bation Judgment as follows: Probation Judgment as follows: ie } em | | © | Mc 48 Vondition (c) Report to the Probation Officer as directed. Condition (c) Report to the Probation Officer as directed. 5 i Subject was instructed by letter dat ’ a. i ed Sept. 3, 1953, to report Subject was instructed by letter te report to the District Probation N hin - ess erate reobetion Office in Lenoir, N.'C., on September Office in Leneir, N. C., on September 21, 1953, and he failed te re- SD to subject at 125 Dor ie o, Feport om said date. Letter was mailed port on said date. Letter was mailed to subject at 23976 Cunmingham, a registered aan > Dwight Street, New Haven, Conn., air mail, an Dyke, Mich., air mail, registered with recéipt requested and o> Said receipt wa receipt requested and deliver to addressee only. deliver to addressee only. Said receipt was received in the District _CO im Sept. 8. 1053 . caesarean in the District Office in Lenoir on Probation Office on Sept. 11, 1953, showing letter was delivered te ea I i 1953.” » Showing letter was delivered to subject on Sept. 5, subject on Sept. 9, 1953. He! v . | ae Condition (f) Remain within ondit ion (t} Remain within a specified area and shall not change a — @ specified area and shall not change place ef resid f the Probation Officer. et — Ty place of residence without written consent of the Probation Officer. Pree i WOLTTED SERRENS 6 f On Septem On September 2, 1953, Probation Officer learned from parents of subject a ee had fore patton Officer learned from parents of subject that hehad left his home in Taylorsville, North Carolina, fon. i ll : taken resid Ome in Taylorsville, N. C., and and taken residence at 23976 Cynningham, Van Dyke, Michigm, and en ( |e - seemeer 1, 1955, mail seregtreets ann Connecticut, and prtouber fot 1953, subject's eat tae returned from Taylorsville, th} me .? o subject at Taylorsville + %., marked b ta "moved, left no address". ‘ ee ti, edérete®. returned by postal authorities marked Gapved. left no , Y postal officials "moved, yh an || ae IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that a capias be issued by the Clerk Hd -—_ THEREFORE Sy : of the C + ORDERED that a capias be issued by the Clerk f this Court for the above named defendant, that he be taken amd returned - 0 ES urt for the abovenamed defendant, that he b k nd returned to the Court ¢ is | te the Court for a h " ? ae Sa Gor er a hearing as te his guilt or innocence ef violating t a SS ‘iin it ies Saring a8 to his guilt or innocence of violating the "wlers of the Court, ae re of t Court, ; / IT IS FURTHER ORDERED 't I$ FURTHER ORDERED THAT when the defendant be found, the Sheriff , THAT when the def rf ether ¢ or other duly authorised law enfe penne Te Ch, She ee uly authorised law enforcement Officer ef this County shall return the reement Officer of this County shell defendant to Iredell County and shall produce him in Court fer the hearing hearing ,bove mentioned, Move mentioned, 20 day of October, 1953, We J, W P s "T9008 C08 8444 os produce him in Court for the > This the This the 20 day ef October, 1953. —supentor toueY J000E eR ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, Nevember 9, 1953 IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the Ae. 1103 County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N.C. on the =" 9th day of November, 1953, at 10:00 e'clock A. M., when and where His Honer, cay Sanoey J, Will Pless, Jr, Judge Presiding and Holding Vourts for this the Fifteenth No. 1415 Judicial District ef North Carelina, Fall Term, 1953, is present and presiding, _ and Honorable Zeb 4. Merris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for cisterd Charles He? the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting lo. 1616 in the name of the State. J.C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is — present and opened Court by order of the Court. J. D. Gray J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the “Wo. 16k t names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for — S| Troy Fespe rman this the Nevember Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior Court, for the first ik | oe we No. 172k State et vs a | H. T. Morrow Ww. Cc. Kyles Je 0. Hunter L. D, Wall | I — ‘No. 1734 b es “reckest Earl Royall E. 0. Wineceff, Jr. State vs é | tr J.N. Harris Parks Johnsen H, R. Sherrill Willard L Dison : ; Ww. Je B t & wy i — W. F, Feimster Dalmas L. Brow No. 1834 | rN t Mrs. Bertha Reavis J.C, Williams John E. Boyd State a i ae &. G. Eudy Nelson Curlee L Ss —_— J. D. McGlamery Paul W. Patterson urlee Land | nat! Reece Campbell 1 Marvin L. Starnes fF. D. Jurney Wo. 1842 Ht &. M. Gaither James H. Thompsen vs Robert Lee St John C, Lankford J. L. Ervin oe ' Ht : “lizabeth Bradburn | J. M. Bridges Wade Wilson R. V. Shumake O. H. Summerlin "Ket B. F. Deal Elisabeth Holshouser ve Bill Jones He te A. W. Overcash, J. N, Herris and J. D, McGlamery were excused by doctor's certificate bi Wade Wilson was out of the State, “fate” Earl Royall was not returned. taoree M. Smith + Omit ~ C. Lankford was excused by the Clerk. ‘te 142 i + R. Sherrill and 0, 4, a | | <a nc were out of the County. o ij James Tomlin, DS was sworn ‘eg ! ®s officer in Charge of the Grand Jury. ‘lo, 1757 State vs aa | Arthur Gilbert Jones \ | No, 1863 | te Sta vs Staney Head IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Ha WA f WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 HAE Ei FALSE PRETENSE (COMPLIANCE) ee Continued under former order. FORGERY (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ba Alias Capias. | ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT (COMPLIANCE) Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT A mate Alias Capias. o (i ‘ DRUNK & DISORDERLY Alias Capias. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Alias Capias. Cee Judgment complied with. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON (COMPLIANCE) i q ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON (COMPLIANCE) i ts It is ordered by the Court that the defendant ay $100.00 now and the balance on December 15, ‘ 953. 1 FALSE PRETENSE Alias Capias. CASH BOND APPEARANCE Defendant called and failed. MURDER Continued, FAIL TO KEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Nol “ros With Leave. = ee en el ea i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, Nevember 9, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N.C. on the 9th day of November, 1953, at 10:00 e'clock A. M., when and where His Honer, J, Will Pless, Jr, Judge Presiding and Holding Vourts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District ef North Carelina, Fall Term, 1953, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb 4. Merris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J.C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and opened Court by order of the Court. J. C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the Nevember Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior Court, for the first week, to-wit: H. T. Morrow A. W. Overcash WwW. os Kyles Je 0. Hunter Claude P. Chappell E. 0, Wineceff, Jr. M. W. Lytten James Brackeet Earl Royall J.N. Harris Parks Johnsen H. R. Sherrill W. J. Bostian W. F. Feimster Dalmas L. Brow Mrs. Bertha Reavis J, ©, Williams John E, Boyd &. G. Eudy J. D, McGlamery Paul W. Patterson Reece Campbell Marvin L. Starnes F. D. Jurney J. L. Cain &. M. Gaither James H, Thompsen J. L. Ervin “lizabeth Bradburn John C, J. M. Bridges emia Wade Wilson O. H. Summerlin R. V. Shumake B,. F. Deal Elisabeth Holshouser A. W. Overcash, J. N. Harris teh and J. D, McGlamery were excused by doctor's certifies Wade Wilson was out of the State. Earl Royall was not returned, John C. Lankford was excused by the H. R. Sherrill Clerk, and 0, H, Summerlin were out of the County, EB. G. Eudy was excused by the Vourt, James Tomlin, DS was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. ? WEEK wo ah we On OD NOVEMBER TERM — Monday, November 9, 1953 Ae. 1103 State vs Guy Ramsey Mo. 1415 State clifford Charles Hall wo. 1616 State vs J. D. Gray “Wo. 16bs State vs Troy Fespe rman “Neo. 1724 State vs L, D, Wall ‘No. 1734 State vs Willard L Dison lo, 1834 State vs Nelson Curlee Land Wo. 1842 State vs Robert Lee Strange ‘Wo. 1843 State ve Bill Jones Wo. 1680 Hate ‘8 George M. Smith \ No, 1422 State vs Mack Miller 'Mo, 1 Stare? vs Arthur Gilbert Jones \ No, 1863 te Sta vs Stamey Head IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1953 FALSE PRETENSE (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. FORGERY (COMPLIANCE) Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT (COMPLIANCE) Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Alias Capias. DRUNK & DISORDERLY Alias Capias. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Alias Capias. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON (COMPLIANCE) Judgment complied with. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON (COMPLIANCE) It is ordered by the Court that the defendant ay $100.00 now and the balance on December 15, 953. FALSE PRETENSE Alias Capias. CASH BOND APPEARANCE Defendant called and failed. MURDER Continued, FAIL TO KEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Nol ‘ros With Leave. ap eee eS Fee — ees | ; { ; ae cy 3 2 tet gee a Seed a : " ‘ oo - oid > er) re Es =) | U x ‘s) FRONT = lo ais S alee a a= —_, ‘Nos. 1967 1968, 1969 & 1970 State vs -Thomas Jarvis /Bristel Rash “William Levi Trivette AR B Holland ‘Wo. 1952 State vs Nowen (None) Williams We35 +No. 1917 State a. ger W Linne C=28 7 INo. 1930 State vs Jimmie Martin W-20 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK we<--- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 9, 1953 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill. oe DRUNK efendant through his attorn a = Guilty. ° ~ udgment of the Court is that the d be confined in the Common Jail of a County fer a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspenied upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $105.00 and the cost of this action. 2. ‘hat he not operate a moter vehicle upon the public highways for a period of Twelve (12) Months. 3. That he remain of good behavior for a period of Three (3) Years and particularly that he not violate the motor vehicle laws during that time, otherwise capiss to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the Court. — bd DEADLY WEAPON ° aughlin is private prosecuting attorney fer the Sune, - . J. G. Lewis, attorney for the Defendant, Defendant through his attorney enters a plea of Guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell Ounty for a period ef not legs than Twelve (12) nor more than Eighteen (18) months, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Vommission. FORGERY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Conse is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, to be assi to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission . It appearing to the Court that at the Novente erm, 1950, the defendant was cawicted upon the charge of forgery, placed on probation with _— contenes of not less than three (3) nor more ie ive (5) years, suspended for Five (5) Yea ve that date upon conditions, among other things, bp defend:nt be of good behavior. The Court ad ining as a fact that the defendant has violst® the terms of the suspended sentence, in that mer at this term of the court entered a plea of gi of forgery in case No. 1930 and has been sente Te ye Ctght (8) Months therein: od tt the Now en°™ ordered that the sentence impor, © November Term, 1950, be and the same is we into effect and caplas and commitment t0 *!),, the amith. e Court is of the opinion tht, pisfendant's violation of the terms of ag re ationary judgment required that the s@™ |) Ser into effect, a sentence of not less than “tt the wore than five (5) Years is not justified © acts in this case, and therefore recomne, goo boner arate of the defendant conditioned up 4 : pind when he shall have completed the ” ntence imposed in case No. 1930. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 9, 1953 t8 OF NORTH CAROLINA SuNTY. OF IREDELL State of North Carolina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. 1278 itis ORDER REVOKING PROBATION Martin comme Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard at the November 9, 1953 Term of Iredell County Superior Court, before the Honorable J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding, being held in the City of Statesville, North Carolina, upon the report of State Probation Officer Everette L. McBryde, the defendant being in Court in persen WHEREUPON the Court finds the following facts: 1. That at the November 7, 1949 Term of Iredell County Superior Court the defendant entered a plea of oy to the crime of r Forgery and was sentenced by the Hon. ank M. Armstrong to three to five years on the roads, which sentence was suspended, and the defendant was placed on yrobation for a period of Five yoers under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation ommission and its Officers under the general conditions of probation and the follewing special comdition: reimburse Mr. rank Brown $30.00 and Mr. Dave Brown $40.00 within six months after the expiration of the 8 months road sentence imposed in No. 1277 . 2. the above named defendant has wilfully violated the following condition of the probation judgment: On Nov. 9, 1953 in Iredell County Superior Court, this defendant entered a plea of Guilty to the crime of Forgery and was sentenced by Judge Pless to 8 months on the roads. This is in violation of condition j. of the probation judgment which states "not violate any law of any State of the Fedeal Vovernment and be of general good behavior". IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the probation be and is hereby REVOKED and the sentence heretofore suspended of three to five years on the roads is hereby ordered into effect. This the 9th day of November, 1953. of the Court. J, W J \Wo. 18 behe ' DRUNK . Vefendant re his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Guilty. ‘ae *. Pierce Jud a of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of ~redell County for a period ef THIRTY (30) DAYS, to be compet to work on the roads under the supervision © the State Highway and P This —— is — : the defendant the cost o he not become Tnvoxieated for a period of Three (3) Years, otherwise capias to issue to put the road sentence into effect at any subsequent term ublic Works Commisdon. ded upon the condition that f this action and that i hei : a (No. 1950 State vs Robert Roy Taylor We 33 No. 1971 state vs Walter Price, Jr. ‘Noy 1965 State vs \ No, 1966 State vs Hubert Stimpsen ‘ Glenn Si gmen by the Court that he Pay a fine George Wilson, memb by the Court that h » Member of the Grand er of the Gr ° pay a fine of $20750""* called and failed, It is ordere IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 9, 1953 DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Gui) Judgment ef the Court is that a tie be confined in the Common Jail of Irede)} Com for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be ass oon to work on the roads under the Supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commi sion This sen ence is suspended cmndit ions: pended upon the following 1. That the defendant and the cout of the alee” @ Pine of $105.0 ° hat the defendant not Operate a upon the public highways for two (2) Teer, saan time shall include Twelve (12) Months suspension of license imposed as to the defendant in Recorde:! — fens court Oct. be 1953. " e t the defendant be of good beh a peiod of Three (3) Years, : — MURDER The Grand a returns in open Vourt in a boi (Sixteen present) a true bill of Indictnent charly defendant Walter Price, Jr, with the capital offey of Murder in words and figures as follows: "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT Iredell County. November 9, Tert, | THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRisit That Walter Price, Jr. late of the County of Init! on the 2nd day of September A. D., 1953, with fort and arms, at and in the said County, untewfully, wilfully, feloniously, and of his malice afore- throught, did kill end murder one James Henry Brown catrary to the form of the statute in such Case made and provided, and against the peace am dignity of the State, Ee olicitor. No » 1971 STATE vs Walter Price, Jr. INDICTMENT MURDER Wit ess Dr. T. V. Goode; Sam Laws; 5 ner Serino; &, W. Dixon; « G. Kyles; Those marked x ouare by the undersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found x A TRUE BILL atom tS a oreman of the Gra urye BREAKING, ENTELING & LARCENY A True 541] BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True 4i]] Jur - of #20200. Called and failed. It is ord Jur IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 9, 1953 Mo. 1900 State vs : John T. Vlic k Cohh ‘No. 1911 State vs Glenn Junior Barlow W-30 ‘No, 1967 State thom Omag J Weal arvig ‘Ne, 1968 State Bri ° stol Rash N lo, 1 ere” Vs v item Levi Trivet te ‘Ne. 1970 Rave’ a," . B, Hol POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant through his attorney, J. G, Lewis, enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment ef the Court is that the defendant be cranfined in the Vommon Jail of Iredell County for a period of not less than Twelve (12) nor more than Eighteen (18) Months, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of this action. 2. that he be of good behavier, particularly that he not violate the prohibition laws na that he have or permit the possession of intoxicat- ing liquors in any quantity at his home or on any remises under his control for Five Years. e defendant is required to appear at each May and November Terms of the court for that period and show to the satisfaction of the presiding /udge that he has fulfilled this cendition, otherwise capias to issue to put the road sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the Court. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney, J. G. Lewis, enters a plea ef Guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, this being the defendant's 2nd offense for driving drunk. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $200.00 and the cest of this action. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways for a period ef Three (3) Years. 3. That he remain of good behavior and particularly that he not violate the motor vehcile laws for a period of Five (5) Years, etherwise capias to issue to put the road sentence into effect at any subseauent term of the Court. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant through his attorney, Mr. Burke, enters a plea of Guilty to Larceny of property under $100.00 value. a ieee ° e prosecuting a fou" tal’ eas ** BtsTete pees . BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant through his attorney, Mr. Burke, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere to Larceny of roperty under $100.00 value. . R. Battley ts private prosecuting attorney for the State. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant —— 7 his ome. 7. aie ty to Larceny of prop Sie a ee aa. Tw. R. Battiey is ppivate prosecuting attorney for the State. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant through his attorney, Mr. Burke, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere to Larceny of roperty under $100.00 value. W. R. Bate ley s private prosecuting attorney for the State. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE YPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ««---- NOVEMBER TERM 19 FIRST WEEK ««--.<<-. NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 ' | | Monday, November 9, 1953 lias Monday, November 9, 1953 ‘No. 1808 DRIVING DRUNK 1802 DRIVING DRUNK: AID & ABETT IN DRIVING DRUNK | Ly State Defendant through his attorney, J. G —— . Defendants through their attorneys, Wad | vs Lewis, enters a =: of Guilty, ° : a & Battley, enter a plea of Not Louis W. McKesson, Jr. Judgment of the Court is that the d Philo Witherspoon ° rr Weil : be confined in the common ep of Tredeqe Srecearé Rash These twe cases are cmsolidated for the \< County for a paiod of Six (6) Months, to be purpose of trial. i assigned to work on the roads under the ona cure and empanelled as sethowes ly supervision of the State Highway and Public H. T. rrew Reece Campbell « C,. Williams Works Commission. Thig sentence is suspended James Brackett M. W. Lytton Marvin L. Starnes upon the following conditions: W. J. Bostign Parks Johnson 8, F, Deal 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $125.00 J. M. Bridges W. F. Feimster J. 0. Hunter and the cost of this action. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle upon 4. 1899 } POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR | i the public highways for a period of Eighteen (14) St | } ‘ State Alias Vapias,. Months, the evidence showing that the defendant operated his car at a speed of 80 miles per hour tiie Harris ! for a distance of more than a mile, the siren bid sounding and efficer's cars lights flashing, | 3. at he be of good behavior, particularly “Nos. 1918 & 1403 } AWODW . (ean | that he not violate the motor vehicle laws for State Cont inued. t a period of three years. Lf atc’ ee vs | Clement P YVaither, Jr. ° fy vs (Seventeen present) a true bili of Indictment ' Memphis H. Pegram charging the defendant Memphis H. Pegram, with the 1 lide | | 5 | capital offense of Murder in words and figures is a ! follows: His, lel "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COUR : : M | Iredell County November 9th soem, 10) ti | THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESEN: That Memphis H. Pegram late of the County ef Iredell, on the 19th day of September A. D. 1953, with force and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, wilfully, filoniously, and of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder one Su H. Meore contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against ti peace and dignity of the State. ab A, Morr No. 1972 State Vota, i | ‘Ne. 1972 MURDER as: fs K State The Grand Jury returns in open Court ina body | me — oe euFau FRONT ee ‘ 2) —_ icitor. aS a 2) oS menebie H. Pegram NDIC TMENT MURDER Witness i Melvin Brown; Edna Davis; Dr. J. S, Helbcesk; Capt. Lackey; Hy W. W. Messick; Paul Jordan; Essie Allison; Charlie Rumple; font Those marked x sworn by the undersigned [0 f oe ce eS ee ee —_ =e i man, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this ; ve bill found ni x A TRUE BILL | John T, G oreman the Grand Jury- ‘Ne. 196 Boks , MANSLAUGHTER vs Glenn E, Miller sMo. 1964 State EMBEZZLEMENT bs A True 6111, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, November 10th, Paul Revere Plyler 1953 » &© 9:30 e'clock A. M, 13) oe eayet “oz. FRONT PA ‘ ———— —_ ae. __4 a === , ur ez oe 5 o os ae ee ee ee wate case IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ~----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 This Honorable Yourt convenes according to adjournment on Tue sday Morning, November 10, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, It is ordered by the Vourt that the fine of $20.00 heretofore upon Glenn Sigmon and George Wilson, members of the Grand Jury, be atta, out. \Nos. 1959 & 1960 State vs Paul Goedson Wilson We2h, “No. 1971 State vs Walter Price, Jr, Cmh2 ‘ No . 1947 State vs John E, Garris W-55 “No. 1946 State vs Clyde Rockford *ooten W-51 ’ Nos. 1920 1921, 1922 1923 &1 State 92h vs ‘Roy Daniel Rumple Marvin Vonald ‘Marshall Henry \Nos. 1925, 1926 & 1927 State vs Kenneth Wesley urner Fox Fox NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE: DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Guilty in both cases. No. 1960 consolidated with 1959 for judgment, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredel) County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. s sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay a fine of $125.00 ani the cost in the two cases. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways for a period of Sixteen (16) months, and not then unless and until he has obtained a valid driver's license. 3. That he be of good behavior and not in any xn violate the law for a period of three (3) Years. MURDER Defendant through his attorney, John Jd. Mahonty, enters a plea of Guilty to manslaughter, which plea the State will accept. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the State Penitentiary at hard labor for a term of not less than Six (6) nor more than Eight (8) Years. DRUNK Defendant through his attomey, J. &. Levis, enters a plea of Guilty. DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contenders. snagnent of the Court is that the defendan be confined in the common jail of Iredell - County for a period ef thirty (30) Vays to assigned to work in or around the County one or Farm; this sentence to begin at the expire tion of the sentence he is now serving at the County Home. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued for the Defendant. RESIST ARREST: . asgaur itl DEADLY Wraroy? ASSAULT ON FEMALE: AS Defendant called & fail t Nisi Se! ed. Jud n Fa and Gapias, $3,000.00 bond. ” IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 Mas 1801 State Wi} ltan Philo Witherspoon W-56 ‘No, 1802 State vs Mack Leonard Rash W-46 No, 1980 State vs William M. Reynolds > No, 1846 State vs is Horace Howie Wo, 1979 State Ys James Carr ‘No, 197 State , vs San King Mo, 198) State ve Charles Vv. Groom Mo. 176 State , ‘8 uy Richard Elmore DRIVING DRUNK Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged. * Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Vounty for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of tiis action. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle for a period of Twelve (12) Months. 3. That he be of good behavior, and particularly that he not violate the motor vehicle laws for @ period of Three (3) Years. AID & ABETT IN DRIVING DRUNK Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended upon the following Conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost of this action. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle for a period of Twelve(12) Months. 3. That he be of good behavior, am art&eularly that he not violate the motor vehicle lows for a period of Three (3) Years, LARCENY OF AUTO A True Bill MANSLAUGH TER A True Bill. LARCENY OF AUTO A True Bill. MAINTAINING COMMON LAW NUISANCE A True Bill. HIT & RUN A True bill. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. LARCENY OF AUTO Defendant enters a plea ef Forcible Trespass. Prayer for judgment cmtinued upon the payment of the cost of this action. =) ee ST / Nos. 1981, 1982 & 1983 State vs Charles W. Groom W~ 23 / \ i y ys \ \ a K \ y\ JX ¥ oN Ne ‘A Y \) . \ No. 1972 State vs Memphis H. Pegram Me. 196, State ve Paul Revere Pp W~32 — Wo. 1949 State vs Sryant Williem Head W-43 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK e-<<-<- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 HIT & RUN: DRIVING DRUNK: NO ' LICENSE OPERATOR! efendant enters a plea of Guilty J. G. Lewis is private prosec : attorney for the State. a In No. 1981, Judgment of the Court a that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for not less than Eighteen (18) nor more than Twenty-Four (24) Months and assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions; 1. That the defendant pay the cost of this action, which shall include the sum of $700.0 for the use and benefit of JB. White, $400,0i for the use and benefit ef K. C. Marlowe. an $200.00 for the use and benefit of Virgil Millsaps, said amount to be paid in monthly installments of $50.00 each, the first payment to be made on or before the 5th day of January, 1954, and $50.00 on or before the Sth day ef each succeeding calendar month theeafter until the total amount is — paid. Upon failure of the defendant to make the monthly payments as above required, capias and comit- ment ® issue to put the prison sentence into effect without further orderof the court, 2. That the cocwndeat be of good bebavior for a period of three (3) Years and not in any wise violate the 1 aw. 3. That he not operate a motor vehicle upm the public highways for Five (5) Years and not tu unless and until he shall te ve obtained a vali driver's license. In view of the judgment pronounced in 1961, Prayer for judgment in 1982 and 1963 are serge with the judgment in 1981. MURDER Defendant through his attorney enters a plea of Guilty of Manslaughter which plet the State will accept. t John Stroup is attorney for the Defend Judgment of the Court is that the defen be imprisoned in the State Penitentiary eB hard labor for a term of not less than Twelv (12) nor more than Sixteen (16) years. EMBEZZLEMENT Batty Defendant through his attermsy, W. B. Lert: enters a plea of Nole Contendere Co Petty us te After heartae the evidence, the Vourt defendant Not Guilty. DRIVING DRUNK anne Grom his attorney, Hugh rs a plea of Guilty. Judgment of ‘natant is that the def entity be confined in the Common Jail of Iredel) i for a peried ef FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be 88 of to work on the roads under the supervise ot, the State Highway and Publie Works Commisnditi@ S sentence is suspended upon py and that the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 # the cost of this action. It is ordered bY Court that the defendant not operate & a vehicle on the public highways for * Pf of Twelve (12) Months, mitenel! No» 1928 State v8 4 The Junior Bussell P| Clyde ¥-26 ‘Wo, 1975 State vs Roy Bumgarner W-37 io. 1976 State vs ~ Sumgarner 37 Wo. 190] State Lend wis B, 0°36 Bailey No, 1 7 tern A ve levis B, Bailey IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK e-<-<- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 LARCENY Defendant tenders a plea of Guilty of temporary larceny of a car, which plea the State accepts. udgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common ee of ’ Iredell County for 4 period of Six (6) Months and assigned to work on the roads under the } supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspemded on condition he pay the cost of this action, which will include $100.00 for the use and benefit of James H. Byers at the rate of $10.00 a week, the first payment to be made on or before Tuesday, December 1, 1953, and $10.00 each Tuesday thereafter until the total amount is fully paid, except the defendant shall not be required to make payments on December 2lst and 28th, 1953. Upon the failure of the defendant to make each payment as herein required, capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect without further order of the Court. 2. ‘that the defendant be of good behavior and not in any wise violate the law Sr a period of tw years. POSSESSION Defendant enters a plea of Guilty, through his attorney, W. R. Battley. POSSESS BEER FOR SALE WITHOUT LICENSE Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Nolo Vontendere. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Nolo ¢ontendere, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of not less than Eighteen (18) nor more than Twenty-Four (24) Months, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision ef the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended for Five (5) Years upen condition the defendant be ef good behavior, not violate the prohibition laws nor have nor permit any quanity of liquor to be kept in any premises owned by him or under his control during that time, The defendant is required to appear at each May and November Term of the Vourt for Five (5) Years and show to the satisfaction of the presiding Judge that he has fulfilled this condition. Upon his failure to appear and make such showing, capias and commitment to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the Veurt. The defendant through his counsel waives the finding of a bill and tenders a ples ef guilty of illegal purchase of intoxicating liquor, which plea is accepted by the State. j Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of Three (3) Months and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision o the State Highway and Public “orks Vommission, this sentence to run ccommerentee with the sentence dated June 5, 1951, of the Recorder's Court o& Iredell County. “No. 1974 State v3 Fred Teague t aa “No. 1912 Ms i ‘ State vs A William Floyd Reavis eases Males and 2 Colored Women, recommended in the last report have not been made up to this All other departments are IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 DRUNK Defendant through his counsel of a bill and tenders a plea of rudlty of 1) transporting intoxicating liquor Judgment of the Court is that be confined in the Common Jail of Tredell Count for a period of SIX (6) Months and assigned te work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. “his sentence is suspended for a period of Three (3) Years upon the condition that the defendant not become int oxicated during said time, otherwis capias and commitment to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent tern of the Court. waives the findin the defendant DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi S¢ Fa and capias. Instanter Process. GRAND JURY REPORT NOVEMBER TERM, }953 The Grand Jury found True Bills of Indictment on all cases that were passed on that were presented by the Solicitor. Committees visited and inspected the following County Properties: County Jail At the Jail we found the follewing prisoners: 1 White female, 13 “hite Males, 10 Colored Males and 5 Colored Females, making a total ef 29 prisoners. We found the building and equipment all in Grade A condition. County Home i We found that the County Home nothing seems to be needed. We has a good supply of food on hand and found 17 White Male Inmates, 14 White Women, 3 Colored Male and 5 Colored Women, Prisoners: 3 white Males, 2 Colored | | Prison Camp Hb \ We found the Prison Camp to be ; | i in A-l1 condition. County Court House Visiting the County Court House, we find that the basement repairs time. in good condi tion, —Yohy tT, G31) __— oreman Legally IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRS'T WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 GRAND JURY REPORT ON SCHOOL INSPECTIONS The Inspection of Schools show that the following repairs are needed badly Troutman Twe more busses needed. Gutters are needed around the building. Te ceiling needs to be replastered, walls in rooms replastered. The floor ig sunk about four inches in some of the Classrooms. The left front end of the building, the brick are seperating and needs repairing. Some of the vindows are out, some sashes are rotten and they all need psinthg. There is leading in several places in the roof and overhead ceiling, which needs repairing. ‘They need at least four more new classrooms to take care of pupils. The school buses are overcrowied and need at least two more. Shepherds School 4s a whole we found that this school was in fair condition. The plaster in some of the toilets need repairing and a new laboratory is also needed, The outside needs new paint and Chimney needs repairing before it fglls on someone, Mt. Mourne We found that this school was in good condition and no repairs needed. “cotts School We found that the upstairs needs some repairs. The floor has swagged and caused a column to be loose and needs repairing. It alse needs painting. More Classroom space is needed. They are using a building back of the school a8 a classroom and it also needs remodeling, repainting, rewired and needs desk in classrooms. The floors in the workshop have swagged and need repairs and new doors and casing are needed. The Gym floors need repairing and leveling. Celeste Henkel School “2 found that this school is in fair condition except for some bad leaks in the roof of Caferteria, causing bed damage to the ceiling. Some of the “lassrooms need rewiring and part of the building needs new gutters ard pipes where old one have rusted out. Brawley School We found repairs are being taken care of at this school. Monticello and “bneser Schools Ne found these two schools in good condition and no repairs needed. Ventral School In this School we found no repair work needed that has not already deen taken care of, Harmony School Ne found this school in fair condition and repsirs are being made whe "urgent. There are no serious defects in any of the building which is ~- EF iN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT iW FIRST WEEK +----=- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 : 4 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 kia | net in progress of being repaired. Wayside School Partition is needed between girls and boys toilets. We found at this school that some of the windows need repairing. The Unity High School walls need waterproofing and new shades in classrooms are needed. Also in need We found this school in fair condition. Roofs in Gym & high school of one bus. ilding are needed. Floors in hall of high school need repairing, walls bu Ne oe Vool Spring School in hallneed repainting, walls in basement need to be waterproofed, needs n We found this school to be in poor condition . The following is needed: a refrigerator in home-ec room and walls in Vafeteria need waterproofed Drains for boys & girls restrooms in primary and high school buildings. Ney and repainted. door locks throughout school, four door checks in graumer grade building and Houstonville School new door, needs screens for windows, and doors in Home-ec and lunch room, At this school we found that the ceiling overhead needs to be re- Repair window frames in high school building and replace window. Floor in nailed and the windows need repairing. Home-ec building needs repairs & banisters on porch. Bookshelves in both eg hh high school & grammer grades needed. Three new typewriter tables, new desk for Ht By | three new classrooms, one filing cabinet needed, one demonstration table p (gies: | for commercial room, new lockers in both buildings, showers in dressing room hi ib i i lt for the high school, wire the building for program clock bells, new library, science and commercial room for high school, stage in the visual aid room, one 7 ' eo a ‘ small school bus needs exchanging for a large one, : hard surface needed on the bus parking lot. Union Grove School In inspecting this school we found that the gutters around the building need replacing, a new basement pump needed, glass in windows & mshes replaced, and one set of steps repaired, “ater pump needs repairing, gym roof repaired, and one cut off in primary building repaired, floor needs repairs and Agriculture room needs wall sockets, room for an electric weldor. Agriculture rooms need nev paint. Colored Schools Amity School This school is in fair condition auditorium needs except for the heating system, in repairinc, The plaster in auditorium needs to be patched and repainted and more Classroom Space is needed Scotts We found the inside of this school in bad condition. need repairs, needs to be rewir in bad condition, It needs painting, ed for better lights, and the floors are floors and needs repairing, é: This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, November ll, sh . ef estnut Grove 1953, at 0:30 9! e found this 8chool to need two new floors clock A, M, » 4n overhead ceiling and the classrooms need to be renailed and Sheetrock used on ceiling and walls.- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 10, 1953 THE SUPERIOR COURT ag FIRST WEEK s---<- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 fig | ae Tuesday, November 10, 1953 | net in progress of being repaired. Wayside School Partition is needed between girls and boys toilets, U High School We found at this school that some of the windows need repairing. The nity Hig - Roofs in Gym & high school walls need waterproofing and new shades in classrooms are needed. Also in need We found this school in fair condition oofs ym g ie - Floors in hall of high school need repairing, walls of one bus. building are needed nt need to be waterproofed, needs [ Vool Spring School in hall need repainting, walls in baseme ; Cafeteria need waterproofed We found this school to be in poor condition . The following is needed: a refrigerator in home-ec room and walls in Ua P Drains for boys & girls restrooms in primary and high school buildings. Ney and repainted. Houstonville School Ait door locks throughout school, four door checks in graumer grade building and ous } verhead needs to be re- | new door, needs screens for windows, and doors in Home-ec and lunch roon. At this school we found that the ceiling o Repair window frames in high school building and replace window. Floor in nailed and the windows need repairing. Home-ec building needs repairs & banisters on porch. Bookshelves in both ae high school & grammer grades needed. Three new typewriter tables, new desk for ae i | ss three new classrooms, one filing cabinet needed, one demonstration table f ii: | | I ts for commercial room, new lockers in both buildings, showers in dressing room ; i | | | a ! for the high school, wire the building for program clock bells, new library, | science and commercial room for high school, stage in the visual aid room, one | I sma l l sch o o l bus nee d s exc h a n g i n g for a lar g e one , har d sur f a c e nee d e d on the bus parking lot, Union Grove School In inspecting this school we found iat need replacing, a new basement pump needed, glass in windows & mshes replaced, Hid ! and one set of steps repaired, that the gutters around the building “ater pump needs repairing, gym roof repaired, and one cut off in primary building repaired. Agriculture room needs wall sockets, floor needs repairs and room for an electric weldor. i; 3 paint. Agriculture rooms need nev Colored Schools This school is in fair condition exce auditorium needs repairine, if Amity School 1 bE iy | ' pt for the heating system, in The b repainted and more classroom spac Plaster in auditorium needs to be patched and e is needed. Scotts ee ie We found the inside of this school in bad condition. floors need repairs, needs to be rewir in bad condition, It needs painting, ed for better lights, and the floors are the window Sashes need repaired porch floor has broken through and needs and new lights put in. The rll repairing. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, November li, Vhestnut Grove 1953 At 9:30 of Ye found this S8Chool to need two new floors , clock A, M, an overhead ceiling and one classroo ms need to be renailed and Sheetrock used on ceiling and walls.. ‘No. 19h4b State vs Paul Church w-30 No. 1957 State va Henry Robert Campbell C-22 \No. 1958 State vs Ralph Shue FIRST WEEK ------ MOVEMBER TERM, 1953 This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Wednesday, November 11, 1953 Hos 1973 Morning, November 11, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, State vs Sam King W-42 NON-SUPPORT McLaughlin & Battley are private pr a for the State. ' abies, efendant through his attorneys, Mrs. J and Mr. Sowers, enters a plea of Not ae Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Claude P. Chappell J. L. Ervin E. 0. Winecoff, Jr. tlizabeth Holshouser Dalmas L. Brown W. C. Kyles John E. Boyd R. V. Shumake F. D. Jurney Hardin Taylor James H. Thompson H. T. Morrow Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged, — of the vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Upon the coming in of the verdict and the rendering of judgement the defendant in open court gives notice of appeal to the Supreme Court for errors assigned and to be assigned. Appeal bond fixed in the sum of $100.00. Appearance bond fixed in the sum of $750.00, SPEEDING Defendant through his attomey, John R, McLaughlin, enters a plea of Guilty to Speeding 70-75 mph which plea the State accepts. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of Sixty (60) Days and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Wore Vommission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: I. That he pay the cost of this action. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways for a period of Two Yo, 1763 Years. State 3. ‘that he be of good behavior and particularly that he not violate the motor vehicle laws for Three (3) Years, otherwise capias and commitment to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the Vourt. ve Mwy tichara Elmore SPEEDING Defendant enters a plea ef Guilty through his attorney, Macon Staone. y b qudgnent of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Couty to. & period of Twelve (12) Months, and ass th = on the roads under the supe: vision 0 This wate Highway and Public Works Commission. editions: is suspended upon the following of cite ection. a fine of $350.00 .— a varies . Twelve (12) Months. "™ = ported me gta78 Parse (3) Yarra: 7 good behavionfor @ P ee " » comlitions, capiee meg eee te ree ee $e put 6, Thompson the ri es term of the eoane® ito effect at any subsed’ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ~----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 IRST WEEK . Wednesday, November 11, 1953 MAINTAINING A COMMON LAW NUISANCE Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. : The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for not less than (18) Eighteen nor more than (24) Twenty-four Months, and be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Coumission. It appearing to the Court that for a number ef months the home of the defendant has been operated in such manner that the conduct of the defendant, his family, visitors and guests, has been such as to seriously disturb the peace and the surrounding community; that there have been frequent cases of drunkenness, fighting, profanity, and other miscondutt, for which the defendant has now agreed to accept the responsibility in the event this prison sentence is not put into effect, the same is hereby suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay the cost of this action. 2. That for a period of Five Years there shall be no disturbance, boisterous conduct, fighting, profanity, drinking, or any other cmduct that will annoy or disturb people living in the same generel community where the defendant resides, whether at his present home or any premises to which he shall move, am that the defendant shall not permit or allow such conduct on the vart of members of his family, visitors or guests at or near said premises. 3. That the defendant be of good behavior and not in ny wise violate the law for a period of FIVE (5) tears. 4. That the defendant eer at each May and November terms of this Court for five years and show to the satisfaction of the presiding Judge that he has fulfilled both the letter and the spirit of the abeve conditions, and upon the failure of the defendant to appear and make such showing, capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term the court. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. Judgment of the Court is that the defendamt be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR(4) MONTHS, and be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision & the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $105.00 and the cost of this action. 2, That he not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways for a period of Twelve (12) Months. 3. That he be of good behavior and particularly that he not violate the motor vehicle laws for Three (3) Years, otherwise capias and commitment to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the Court. RUNNING RED LIGHT Prayer for judgment continued upon the payment of the cost. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -=-=-- NOVEMBER TERM, 195 SE RS | 3 FIRST WEEK ~---- NOVEMBER TERM, 1 ae Wednesday, Novesber 11, 1953 Thursday, November 12, 1953" ee ii 4 No. 1862 Whe wi te This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Thursday State Nol Pros With Leave. v3 Blvy D. Sigman Morning, November 12, 1953, at 9:30 e’clock A. M. to. 1915 ee LICENSE REVOKED INo. 1965 BREAKING, ENTERING & L ARCENY Z ° State Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. ) en vs On the count charging larceny, Judgment Felix Shoemaker of the Court is that the defendant be cmfined W-30 in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a Alo. 19k | NON@SUPPORT period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, and be assigned TT i i isa to work on the roads under the supervision of ie | wea c 3 guilty is hereby set aside, the State Highway and Public Works Commission. cretion of the Court. On the count charging Fmt tesco Judgment i m Paul Church W-30 of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned at the State Penitentiary at hard labor for a period of not less than Fow (4) nor more than even (7) Years, this sentence to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed for larceny and is to be served separately from and in | addition thereto. It is suspended for a period of Five (5) Years upon condition that the defendant be of good behavior and not in any wise violate OY the law, otherwise capias and commitment to issue il cig NY to put the prison sentence into effect at any p | NN. ‘ | 5 subsequent term of the Vourt. hl ; ' 2D ee | iy ‘Ne. 1912 DRIV ING IRUNK 1a State It is ordered by the Court that the Sci Fa ' i vs heretofore entered be stricken out. > Williem Floyd Reavis Defendant through his attorney, J. G. Lewis, Wo48 enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Yourt is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, and be . assigned te work on the roads under the ed, hh supervision of the State Highway and ‘ublic it Nid Works Commission. ‘his sentence is suspended Hi upon the condition that the defendant pay a wa dd fine of $105.00 and the cost of this action, It is erdered by the ceurt that the defendant nd net operate a motor vehicle for a peiod of i Twelve (2) Months and that he be of good behavior he | | for three (3) Years, otherwise capias and 3 | commitment to issue to put the prison sentence 4 be put into effect at any subsequent term of iH} i 4 the Court. CHAE \ "st BASTARDY v , Defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley, Char enters a plea of Guilty to the warrant as amended, Cc es H, Knox Judgment of the Court is that the defendant , be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, and be ssigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay the cost ofthis —— of the Clerk 2. That he pay into the office Superior Court of Iredell County $3.50 each week for the support and maintenance of Yeretsy oo mie said amount to be paid out by the vie t 9:38 eral other responsible person whom ar rae gree Mott, or to an ’ 38 e' clock A. M, ® recess until Thursday Morning, November 12, the br erk oak find 9 supports x oaid child, Upon the failure of.t efendan f ayment as recuired, capias and commitment to loses to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the Vourt. OE ne ee ei Le ‘No. 1952 State vs sugpetee Perry Williams ‘No. 1979 State vs James Carr C-27 ‘Ne, 1873 State vs Robert S. Brigman W-29 ‘Neo. 1956 State vs Yack Donald Warren IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -~---= NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Thursday, November 12, 199 DRIVING DRUNK Defendan enters a plea of Not Guilty, Jury sworn and empanelled as follows; Paul W. Patterson J. M. Bridges Mrs. Bertha Reavis Reece Campbell Elizabeth Bradburn Parks Johnson A. M. Gaither James Brackett W. J. Bestian W. <. Feimster J. Cy. Williams Marvin L. Starnes Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, and be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $105.00 and the cost of this action. 2. That he rot operate a motor vehicle for a period of Twelve (12) Months. 3. That he be of good behavior for a period of three ‘3/) fears, otherwise capias and commitment to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of the Court, LARCENY OF AUTO Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to Temporary Larceny which plea the State accents. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, and be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highwmy and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay the cost of this action which shall include the sum of $25.00 for the us and benefit of Louis Bradshaw, said amount to be paid in weekly installments of $5.00 each, the first payment to be made on or before Tuesday, January 12, 1954, and $5.00 on or before each succeeding Tuesday until the total amount is fully paid. Upon the failure ofthe defendant make each weekly payment as required, capias to issue put the prison sentence into effect without further order of the court. 2. That the defendant be of good behavior for two (2) Years and not in any wise violate the +c Otherwise capias and commitment to issue to Pos prison sentence into effect at any subsequent of the Court. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a lea of Vuilty. Judgment of the Sania is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell — for a period of SIXTY (60)DAYS, and be aseignes to work under the supervision of the State Hig and Public Works Commission. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant not operate @ motor vehicle for a period of Twelwe (12) Months. SPEEDING Continued, case. \Wlo, 1467 ORDER . State It appearing to the vourt, and t..e vourt finding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 199 : | Thursday, November 12, 1953 eat ay | 8 AID & ABETT IN DRIVING DW NK eg ls | 4 No. 194 Defendant thraigh his attorneys, McLaughlin | Mie State & Battley enters a plea of Not Guilty. shirley Dwight Benge Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: W-23 Mrs. Bertha Reavis W. F. Feimster ls Elisabeth Bradburn J. C. Williams {" James Brackett M, W. Lytton ie W. J. Bostian B. F. Deal ly Reece Campbell J. O. Hunter f Parks Johnson E. 0. Winecoff, dr. Jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Vommon Jail of Iredell County for a period @ FOUR (4) MONTHS, and assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the condition that the defendant ay a fine of $105.00 and the cost of this action. t is ordered by the Court that the defendant not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways for a period of Twelve (12) Months. Nos. 1953, 1954 & 1955 RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED: bit, ie SPEEDING " wey _ These cases are consolidated for purpose of ts il f eS James Fred Pennell trial. by Defendant through his attormeys, McLaughlin th Bl | & Battley, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury { Ten by consent) sworn and empanelled as follows: : ; J. Le Cain F. D. Jurney Elizabeth Holshazer t's } Dalmas L. Brown James H. Thompson Hardin Taylor | John E. Boyd J. L. Ervin H. T, Morrow Vlaude P. Vhappell 7 Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty in each as a fact that the defendant has violated the conditions under which a prison sentence of eight Months was suspended at the May Term, 1951, in that the defendant has at this term of the court lead guilty of illegal possession of intoxicating Sieuer, the evidence a e _ the —— had non-taxpaid Liquor a eer in cases five enilens in his possession, itis now oonre Ht that the prison sentence of eight months be an . the same is hereby put inte effect and capias a and commitment issue to that end on Friday, December 18, 1953. E ESSION: POSSESS BEER FOR SALE WITHOUT LICENS ae ent of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell vourty for a term of notless than Eighteen (18) nor _ than Twenty-Four (24) Months. This sentence + suspended for Five (5) Years upon osneaseee =. defendant be of good behavior, particularly a he not violate the prohibition law nor pan P have any quamity of intoxicants on his premises or under any premises controlled by ~y a permit any other person to do so. The ? e oe is required to appear at each November as ; | show to the satisfaction of the prea ee ies bs | that he has fulfilled these conditions, © pie capias to issue to put this sentence into e at any subsequent term. vs Roy Bumgarner he : Sear” & 1976 vs Roy Bumgarner a > ~S /No. 1947 State vs John Everette Garris Nos. 1961 & 1962 State vs Hal Eugene Roseman ' 4 No @ 1977 at State vs Bill D Bumgarner } State vs L. &, Cashion, Jr, No. 1929 State G H Gg sige 931 i K i ‘No. 1963 | State 5 _vs Glenn E, Miller “No. 1846 State vs Otis Horace Howie FRONT ' | No. 1858 i iq State vs | Principal ne i ‘Mrs. C. L, Johnson Surety No. 1899 ' State ‘ Na George Harris Principal “C. L. Johnson Surety No. 1840 State e vs ames Gray Hemmi \ Pri reipal - ‘J. Ray Hemmings Surety vs William Glenn Gilleland \ } Feymond Saunders Spann IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Thursday, November 12, 1953 DRUNK Prayer for judgment cont inued January Term, 1953. — DRIVING DRUNK: SELL PRODUCE FROM P nape ARKING METER Continued. DRIVING DRUNK Continued. EMBEZZLEMENT Continued for the Term, LARCENY OF AUTO Continued. MANSLAUGHTER Continued for the Defendant. MANSLAUGHTER Continued. SCI FA ON BOND IT is ordered that the judgment be made absolute onthe bond. Execution not to issue until January Term, 1954. SCI FA ON BOND Continued. SCI FA ON BOND Alias Sci Fa. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ew Oy te ee NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Thursday, November 12, 1953 /No. 1873 State vs Robert S- Brigman Rincipal flasel Beaver Surety Mo. 1966 State v3 Hubert Stimpson Ho. 1878 State vs Gilmer Sherrill Nos. 1838 & 1839 State vs bugene Clifford ‘merson Wos. 1840 & 1841 State vs James Gray Hemmings ‘Wo, 1879 State vs Amos ‘ucker (No, 1886 State vs James Campbell Wo. 1°87 State vs Luther “hite “No, 189) State vs Coyte Houston This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, November 16, 1953, at 10:00 o'clock A, M, SCI FA ON BOND — on bond is hereby made final to be scharged on payment of the cost the Sci Fa. _ BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Vapias. Instanter Process. POSSESSION FOR SALE Continued. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Continued. BREAKING & ENTERING & LARUENY Continued. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR It is ordered by the vourt that the defendsnt pay the cost by Monday, November 16, 1953. ABANDON & NON-SUPPRT Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under fa mer order. ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ November Term, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 Monday, “ovember 16, 1953 | NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Me. 5558 | ~~ Jury #1" being duly sworn end inn cdi. NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 tates 8. White | ee the issues submitted to it This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, Ruby C.White a November 16th, 1953 at 10:00 O'clock, with Honorable J. Will Pless, dr. Juig NORTH CAROLINA 16 THE SUPERIOR COURT if Presiding and holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District, Fal} IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TEM, 1953 Term, 195 resent and presiding. Y S, White i , 1953, P sree * plaintiff J. ©. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open court the I tj - ISSUES | | ist names of the following good and lawful men ami women to serve as jurors for | ' | Ruby ©. White pa. this the second week of the November Term, 1953, Iredell County Superior , Defendant ! | I : Vourt, to-wit: 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? J J. C. Wood Robert W. Bell Mrs. Paul Harvell i 9 H T Answer. Yes. _ ‘ iy —_ - B. Vlark (FS Jr. arold Tomli _— i! g oe ee ae iene 2. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate ii sw | iq Floyd D. Levan L. A. Black D. H. Wilson and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Compleint? iif HA S | a Ww. C, McGee Mrs. Frank L. Johnsen James S, Holman Answer.__Yes. it ily Bri | | L | Frank W. Futrell M. W. Jones Lewis R Deaton 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more j than six months next preceding the filing of this Vomplaint? v J. W. Levan 5. Gordon Wallace Derwood Johnson ti An -_Yes. E = J. J. Sherrill Homer Transeau M. M. Gaither Swer 08: : —— Walter |. Hefner UC. C. Kistler Jacob G, Ellis S| Mc NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 4] > R. L. Whitlock C. E. Gaither, Sr. ". W. Belk 1 NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 bi Hoy A. Waugh G. H. Johnson Marie R, Mills IREDELL COUNTY , bide Ell ; Tates S, White i ie iA i Ss. N ¢ } : Ja rank ance M. V. Ketchie Anne Gaither Plaintiff | ait RY M. T. Waugh V. M. Cofield vs JUDGMENT EA Y. L. MceVaniel Ruby , White, , 4 | Defendant | | 4 William Taylor PME a . appeared for jury duty as ordered by the Court. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the November Term, 4, i 4 Hal McKinnis appeared for jury duty as ordered by the Court. ft J. W. Levan and M, 1953 Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge V. Ketchie were excused by Dr.'gs certificates. Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted > Walter L. Hefner is U, S. Mail Clerk, i% Robert W to it in the fivor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears i obert W. Bell was excused until the January, 1954, Term of Court. in the record; Homer Transeau lives in Wkes Vounty,. esi V. EB, Gaither, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of Sr. was excused by the Court. and V. M. Gofield is in Portsmouth Va, Matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, a ==. lute James S. Holman lives in Ashe Vounty the sane are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an abso Anne Gaither lives in Clinton. n C , . *. divorce from the defendant. The “his the women constitute what shall hereafter be termed th? 16th day of November, 1953. “ivorce Jury #1" to-wit; e J. Will Pless, Jr. pe J. C, Wood, 0, B. Vlark, Floyd D. Levan, W. © MeGee, udge Presiding Frank W, Futrell, 8. L. es Whitlock, Roy A, Waugh, Frank Ss. Nance, M. . - FF. Williams, Ure, L.A. Black and Mrs Frank L, Johnson, eae eee ee Ke KH FRONT ‘Ne. 5569 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 | DIVORCE $ The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sy Lucille Gilleland { empanelled answers the issues submitted tat vs 1 as follows: James E, Gilleland ! WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Lucille Gilleland Plaintiff, vs ISSUES James E, Gilleland 1 | I Defendant, | 1. Wid the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes _. 2. id the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Vomplaint’ Answer. Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State ofNorth Carolina for more than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Lucille ‘illeland Plaintiff, “ JUDGMENT James E, Gilleland Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the November Term, 195 S ib a uperior vourt of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presi: 12, and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the fa"! of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; ont it appearing to the Court that there was bom of the marriage of the plaintiff and th e defendant one child, William James Gilleland, age twelve years, and Oe the pl plaintiff herein has the care and Custody of said child; and it fur ther appearin & to the Vourt and the Court fimds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and : Suitable person to have the Custody and control of the child, = J ames Gilleland, and that the best interest of gs ” aid child would serve by in the Custody of his mother ’ she being found to be a fit person for the Custody of said child, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, Nowember 16, 1953 It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony ’ heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same er e hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce ar’ fron the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Lucille Gilleland, be and she is hereby awarded full am complete care, custody and control of the child, William James Gilleland. ’ This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the child, is retained for further orders, This the 16th day of November, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr. ge Presiding xe we me Ke KK Wo, 5572 } DIVORCE ! The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Joe V. Ross empanelled answers the issues as follows: v8 Fennie Kate Ross i NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Joe V, Ross, Plaintiff ISSUES fannie Kate Ross, Defendant 1 _ ! I i 1, Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes @. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes 3» Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes NORTH CAROLINA RREDELL county Joe V, Ross Plaintire i “VS. j F annie Kate Ross { Yefendant , f IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 JUDGMENT This cause Coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the Tepula "term of Iredel) Superior Vourt and a jury, and the jury having answered ” SSueg Submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, 48 a Pears in the record; Z| Z IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds ef marriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, J. Will Pless, Jr, ~ JUDGE PRESIDING ——— moe wk OK we me we ok ke ‘No. 5574 | DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly swom an Rosa Lee vhambers | gaupanelled answers the issues submitted to vs t as follows: Joseph Vhambers NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT [IREDELL COUNTY Rosa Lee Chambers Plaintiff, vs ISSUES Joseph Chambers Defendant, 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Vonplaitt’ Answer. Yes 2. Wid the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separ and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes 3+ Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for st than six months next preceding the filing of thisComplaint? Answer, Yes Ne cn IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Rosa Lee Chambers j Plaintiff, vs | JUDGMENT Jeseph Chambers ! ! Defendant, Thi : S Cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the November Ter®, : Superior Vourt of Iredell County before H is Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge a Jury, and the Jury having answered r of all the issues submitted to it in thefave the Plaintire and ; ne against the Defendant, as fully appears in the record; t is, th . ony ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrincn) heretofore exist ng between the 9 arty Plaintiff and the and the sam hereby dissolved defendant be, and the ° the Plaintire is hereby granted an absolute divorce ail Defendant, presiding ™ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -~---- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 tis the 16th day of November, 1953. J, Will P Jr udge Presiding mee Ke KK Ke Ke KK K 83 DIVORCE ‘Woe 59 The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn vary K. Atkins and empanelled answers the issues submitted a to it as follows’ luther W. Atkins North Carolina In The Superior Court Ireda 1 County Mary K, Atkins ! vs | ISSUES luther W, Atkins i l. Has the plaintiff been afesident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes II Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 111 “ere the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and ‘part cntinuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yeg North Carolina Ireddl 1 Count y In the Superior Court Mery K, Atking i ” I JUDGMENT luther w, Atking i This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable J. Will Pless, Judge P : residing over the November Civil Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Vourt, and bei "6 heard before said Honorable J. Wil! Pless, and a Yury, the following i *sues were submitted to the Jury: 1 Mas the plaintirr been a resident of the State of North Carolina for mre ¢ han six months next preceding the institution of this action? ll W *re the plaintirr and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? al tas = Pea —. a lero Al % - LJ 2 —= - rex je po i - Tf re | > Wen IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----=- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 111 “ere the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived Separate and apart contimuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes", It is, therefore, by the Vourt ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be forever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Luther W. Atkins, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the -lerk, This 16th day of November, 1753. J. Will Ples Jr. Judge Presiding i a ee ee a No. 5588 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: walie Austia Turner, Plaintiff Ss. O.W. (Jack)Turmer, Defendant NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Julia Austin Turner, Plaintiff I Vs. | ISSUES O. W. (Jack) Turner, Defendant | he Vid the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband a wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Did the plaintire each other, on and defendant separate and live separate and apart fr And have they lived separate from each other for more than two yet continuously prior te the Answer: Yes ip the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carel institution of this action? f or more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Tes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY IN THE NOVEMBER TERM Julia Austin turner, Plaintirr Vs, 0. Ww JUDGMENT (Jack) Turner, Defenda, t This cause Coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Super Perior Court of Tredel) County will Pies » North Varolina, before His Honor J- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the records. It ig therefore, oriered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of natrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Julia Austin Turner, and the defendant, 0. W. (Jack ) Turner, be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. Will wiesSa Jr. udge Presiding NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM 1953 Julia Austin Turner, Plaintiff Vs, ORDER FOR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD 0, W. (Jack) Turner, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by Honorable J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding, at the November Term, 1953, Iredell County, Superior vourt, and it appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact: 1. That two children, namely, Tonda, age 6, and Steven, age 3, were born to the union of Julia Austin Turner and 0. W. (Jack) ‘urner; 2. That said minor children are now living with their mother, the Plaintiff, and that said children have lived with their mother ever since the plaintirr and the defendant separated on or about the 30th day « duly, 1951, and that during said time the defendant, 0. W. (Jack) Turner, tas contributed nothing for the support and maintenance of said children, i that said children have been wholly supported and maintained by the wther, Julia Austin Turner. 3+ The Court further finds as a fact that Julia Austin Turner, the mt her of the said children, is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and *ontrol of the said minor children, and that thebest interest of said children wou] 4 be served by the children being in the control of the mother at this time. IT 1S, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: a, . That Julia Austin Turner, the plaintiff, mother of the minor children, ' 40d she is , hereby granted the custody and control of the minor children, onda Turner and Steven Turner, Th at the plaintirr pay the cost of the proceeding. This cause is r of the Chilg ren, c, etained for further orders, including the custody t b ae appears to the Court that the above entitled action was brought the Plaintire for an absolute divorce from the defendant upon the grounds a= ) as - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «----- NOVEMBER TERM, 195 Monday, “ovember 16, 1953 of two years separation, and that the defendant filed no answer praying for the custody of tne minor children, and that a judgment granting the plaintirr A absolute divorce from the defendant has already been entered at this term of th Trede)} County Superior Court. This the 16th day of November, 1953. J. Will Ple Jr ——~“Sndee Tresiiing--—— i No. 5599 NORTH C.ROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY The Vivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Rachel ©. Wooten empanelled answers the issues submitted to vs it as follows: William UC. Wooten NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Rachel C. Wooten, Plaintiff vs William C, Wooten, t ! ! Defendant | 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for Six (6) months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: Yes 3. Vid the defendant commit adultery as al eged by the plaintiff in her Complaint’ ANSWER: _ YES WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Rachel Ct, Wooten, Plaintiff | ¥s JUDGMENT William UC. Wooten I YVefendant j THIS CAU SE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, 4 - Pless, Jr., J os Presiding, and a jury at the November Term of the Superior Court of T redell County, and it appearing to the Sourt that defendant has bee properly served with process by Publication, and the following Issues i e submitted to and answered by the Jury: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16th, 1953 Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the l. Vomplaint? ANSWER: _Yes__ 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for one (1) year next preceding the bringing of tls action? ANSWER: _Yegs 3, Did the defendant commit adultery gs alleged by the plaintiff in her Complaint? ANSWER: _Yes NOW, THEREFORE, on Motion of Baxter H. Finch, Attrney for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, Rachel ©. Wooten, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, William U.Wooten, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved absolutely and forever. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the vlerk. This the 16 day of November, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding “ee eH & x * * No, 5600 | DIVORCE \ f The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and rlene Frazier Auton } empanelled answers the issues submitted to bear } it as follows: obert Glenn Auton j NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Arlene Frazier Auton | Plaintiff, vs. i ISSUES Robert Glenn Auton, Defendant. j 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: _ Yes + Has the Plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North “aroli na for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER ; Yes 3, Have the plaintirr and defendant lived separate and apart from each other fo two years next preceding the bringing of this action? MISWER AGS. anf , IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECQND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Arlene Frazier Auton Plaintiff, vs. Robert Glenn Auton, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J, Mi}! Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding, and a jury in the November Term of the Superior Yourt of Iredell Vounty, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been properly served with process by publication, and the following issues having been submitted and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: "Yes", 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Varolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: "Yeg", 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: "Yeg", NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, Arlene Frazier Auton, be, and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce fros the defendant, Robert Glenn Auton, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, be, and they are hereby dissolved, And it further appearing to the Vourt, and the Court finding as a fact, that at there are two minor Unmarried children of the said marriage, namely, U V arolyn Virginia Auton, age 17 years, and Willard Lee Auton, Age 14 years, have b een living with their mother, the plaintiff, since the separation of th . eir parents; ami it further appearing to the Vourt, and the vourt finding as a fact, that the Plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the cust! and control of the said minor children, and that the best interests & eing in the custody of their said the refore, Ordered that the plaintirr be, and she is hereby granted ahd complete Custody and control of the i n, until order of this Cours. said minor children, And it is further Ordered B be taxed by the Vlerk, This 16 day of November, 1953 6 as J. Will Pless, Jr., Jud the furthl nt that the plaintiff pay the costs of this st? hes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOMD WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: No. 5601 lois B. Corley VS~ Bdie Corley WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERY 1953 Lois B. Corley, Plaintiff Ve. ISSUES iddie Vorley, Defendant 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: _Yes 2, Vid the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 lois B. Corley, “laintirr Vs. JUDGMENT Midie Vorley, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Termof the Superior ‘out of Iredell vounty, North Carolina, before His Honor J. Will Pless, Judge "residng, and a jury and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the ‘ourt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the records. IT is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony ‘eretofore existing betweem the plaintiff, Lois B. Vorley, and the defendant, Hddie “Srley, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. een KKK Ke ee KK HK HK FH — ee SE . ~~ nn cnet =a - a NS EE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ECOND WEEK ------- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 ’ Monday, November 16, 1953 No. 5601 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM 1953 Lois B. Vorley, Plaintiff Vs. ORDER FOR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD Eddie Vorley, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by Honorable J. Will Plegs, Judge Presiding, at the November Term, 1953, Iredell County Uperier Court, and it appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fac: 1. That one child, namely, Judy Corley, was born of the union of Lois Bb, vorley and Eddie Vorley, said child now being years of age. 2. That said minor child is now living with her mother, the plaintiff, and that said child has lived with her mother ever since the plaintiff andthe defendant separated on or about the 22nd day of December, 1949, and that during said time the defendant, Eddie Vorley, has contributed nothing for the support and maintenance of said child, and that said child has been wholly supported and mairtfained by the mother, Lois 34. vorley. 3. The Vort further finds as a fact that Lois B. vorley, tue mother of said child, is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor child, and that the best interest of said child would be served by the child being in the control of the mother at this time. IT Is, THEREFORE, ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED: A. That Lois B. Corley, the plaintiff, mother of the minor child, be, #m she is hereby granted the custody and control of the minor child, Judy Corley. b. ‘hat the plaintirr pay the cost of the proceeding. ¢. This cause is rv child, tained for further orders, including the custody of the It further appears to the by the plaintiff for an Court that the above entitled action was brought absolute divorce from the defendant upon the grounds . two years separation, and that the defendant filed no answer praying for ” custody of the minor child, and that e judgment granting the plaintiff a absolute divorce from f che the defendant has already been entered at this term © Iredell County Superior Court, This the l6th day of November, 1953. J. Will Pless, J ge presiding ~*t@ eee eee eanese ar e hereby dissol veq ’ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK +----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: ‘No. 5617 vs Paul Walter Barnes yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Kathleen Yoble barnes - Plaintiff, “ ISS VES Paul Walter Barnes i i 1 Defendant, ) 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Vid the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate ind apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes ° 3. Has the plaintiff been a residant of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? ‘nswer, Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Kathleen Goble barnes, Plaintiff vs ! I JUDGMENT l Paul Walter Barnes Defendant | This cause Coming on to be heard and being heard at the Nowember Term, 1953 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; and it appearing to the Court that there was born of the marriage * the plaintiff and the defendant one child, Kitty Paulette Barnes, age five Yeers old, and that the plaintiff herein has the care and custody of said child; dit further appearing to the Court and the Court finds as a fact that the ae ‘8 @ fit and suitable parson to have the custody and control of tie _ Kitty Palette Barnes, and that the best interest of said child would Serve 'y being in the custody of her mother, she being found to be a fit person or the Custody of said child, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony "tof re existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from - = ——— lemon ema yeanonand 1 RE ee ae Se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintite, Kathleen Goble Barnes, be and she is hereby awarded full and complete Care, custody and control of the child, Kitty Paulette Barnes, This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the child is, retained for further orders. This the 16th day of November, 1953. J. Will 8h Jr. udge Presiding eee KK KK KKK Km 1 N,. 5630 Richard Hutchins | DIVORCE vs The Divorce Jury #1" being duly son Macon M, Simons, Guardian ad Litem, and empanelled answers the issues si. of the Infant, Sylvia Benfield Hutchins, | mitted to it as follows: and Sylvia Benfield Hutchins, Defendants NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Richard Hutchins, Plaintiff vs. Issues Macon M, Simons, guardian ad Litem, of the Infant, Sivia Benfield Hutchins, and “ylvia Senfield Hutchins, Vefendants 1. id the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answers Yes 2. Vid the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart fre each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 3+ Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Vardi for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1953 Richard Hutchins, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Macon M. Simons, Guard Infant Sylvia Benfield were Litem, of the chi Sylvia Benfield Hutchins, Defententa This Cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Brm of the Superior Yourt of Iredell County, North varolina, before His Honor J. Will P less, Judge Presiding, and a jury and the jury having answered the issues IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 pnitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against gu the defendant, as set out in the records. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Vourt that the pbadso matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Richard Hutchins, and the defendant, Sylvia Benfield Hutchins, be and the same ’ ‘ are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding we we Ke KK KK KH No, 5653 Jack W. Reeves vs Aleesa Cook Reeves NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Jack W, Reeves Plaintiff vs. AleesaCook Reeves, Defendant DIVORCE The Vivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ISSUES 1, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Was the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of ‘orth Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: les 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from ‘ach other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes This 16th day ef November, 1953. WORTH CAROLINA TREDELL county Jack ¥, Reeves Plaintire vs, ! ! 4) : "88 Look Reeves i Defendant i Ples 8, Ur, Judge rede) County ’ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGME NT Thi om Ome Coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. *ill Presiding and a jury at the November term of the Superior Court of and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has accepted in = - cl an IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 writing service of process in this action as by law provided and that the jury has answered the issues submitted to them in this cause in favor of the plaintiff, as will appear of record. Now therefore, on motion of William H. Chamblee, attrney forthe plaintife, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Jack W. Reeves, be an he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Aleesa Cook Reeves, and that thebonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff au the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Vlerk. This 16 day of November, 1953. J, Will Ple Jr ge Presiding. ee egaegK eK HK eH ‘No. 5551 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted vs to it as follows: Vonnie H. Ware Carl O. “are NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Jarl O. Ware vs | Jonnie H, Ware ' l. Were the plaintiff, Carl 0, Ware, ami the defendant, Donnie H. Ware, lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. ii. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for mor than six months next Preceding the institution of this action? Answer; Yes, lll. uv id the defendant, Donnie H, Ware, commit adultery as alleged in the Answer: Yes ¢ omplait" IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Cerl 0. Ware i v8. i JUDGNENT Donnie H. Ware ' This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding over the November Civil Term 1953 Iredell Superior Court, and being heard before said Honorable J. Will Pless, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted to the Jury. l. Were the plaintiff, Carl O. Ware, and the defendant, Donnie H. Ware, lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? ll. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for nore than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Ml. Did the defendant, Donnie H. Ware, commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes". It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the def«ndant be brever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Donnie H. Ware, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Vlerk. J. Will Pless J ge Presiding xe meh mh re KK . - » Ns o a Sey ee eee ee He \ we ee = IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----. NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 + No. 5610 Martha Dillon Christy DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being dul Y sworn an vs empanelled anawers the issue as follows: + Comer ts Junius Fleming Christy NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL v OUNTY Martha Dillon Vhristy vs Junius Fleming Vhristy l. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for mre than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes ll. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes lll. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and, have they lived separate and apart continously for two years next preceding the institution of this action’ Answer: Yes North Carolina In the Suprior court Tredell C ounty Martha Dillon Christy | ves | JUDGMENT Junius Fleming Christy | This cause Coming on to be heard before Honorable J. Willfless, Judge Presiding over the November Civil Term 1953 Iredell County Superior Vourt, and being heard before said Honorable J. Will Pless, and a Jury, the following iss were submitted to the Jury: 1. H 6s the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for moré i eix months next preceding the institution of this action? ll, “ere th e plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 lll. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? he Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes", It is, therefore, by the Vourt ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be forever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Junius Fleming Christy, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk. Thisl6th day of November, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding eee eK Ke Ke KK ‘NO. 5612 } DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted Nancy Goodman Smith te it as follows: vs Sherrill Gray Smith NORTH C AROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Nancy Goodman Smith, Plaintiff Vs Sherrill Gray Smi th, Defendant l. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: Yes ¢. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North “arolina for six (6) Months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: YES 3 Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each ot her for two (2) years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER; Yes WORTH CAROLINA TREDELL counpy "ey Goodman Suit h, ‘ Plaintirr IN THE SUPERIOR COURT “Wrrill Gray Smith, Defendant THIs CRUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK eeaawon NOVEMBER TERM 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 J, Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding and a jury at the November Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Vourt that the defendant has been personally and properly served with process, the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: l. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: _ Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six (6) months next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER:_ Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate andapart fram each other for two (2) Years next preceding the bringing of this action? ANSWER: __ YES NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Baxter H. Finch, Attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Nancy Goodman Smith, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Sherrill Gray Smith, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved; And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as 4 fact , that there is one minor child of said marriage, David Sherrill Smith, wo has been living with his mother, the plaintiff, since the separation of his parents; amit further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as & fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody ané control of said minor child; and that the best interest of said child would be served by being in the custody ofhis said mother; and that the Court further finding as a fact that the defendant is not a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor child; And it appearing to the Court, and the Vourt finding as a fact that the defendant is now, and has been since the date of the separation of the ne hereto, paying to the plaintirr by way of support and maintenance for said minor child, the sum of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) per month ad the — finding as a fact that the defendant is well able and capable of payin - a sum for said minor child's support and tiat such a sum is reasonable and necessary for the proper maintenance and support of said minor child; Wt Ae therefore ordered that the plaintiff, Nancy Goodman Smith, beat h she is hereby granted full and complete custody and control of said aoe child, D p vavid Sherrill Smith, until the further order of this Courts 0) defendant pay to the Plaintiff the sum of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS (410 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 per month for the maintenance, support and tuitien of said minor child, david Sherrill Smith; And it is further ordered that the defendant be privileged to visit és Ang ee m nn Rca SM ni ME i said minor child at the residence of the plaintiff so long as said visits do not interfere with the school duties ¢ said child, and provided further that on such visits the defendant conducts himself as a gentleman in every respect and particularly to refrain from the use of profanity while on the | Tk } i a) ie “4 premisesaf the plaintiff's residence and further that he in no manner abuse the plaintiff, said minor child, or her relatives either verbally er physically vaile on the premises of the plaintiff's residence; and it is futher ordered thet the defendant not under any circumstances upon said visits take said child out of the State of North Carolina and thus out of the jurisdiction of this Yourt; thet it is ordered that during said visits by the defendant to said minor child that he be permitted to take said child 6 times per year to Rowan County to visit relatives of the defendant provided said defendant pest a justified bond in the sum of FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) payable tothe plaintiff at the time of the taking ef said child to Rowen County for such visits, said bond to be null and void provided the defendant return said child te the custody of the plaintiff within 72 hours from the time the plaintiff relinquishes said child to the defendant for the purpose of such a visit, otherwise the bond to be of full foree and effect; And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This the 18 dey of Nov., 1953. J; Mie mises a udge Presiding ee eee KH om 5621 Betty Jean Nentz Caudill vs Everett Cyril Caudill 9579 L R Cashion, Jr vs Coy Lee Hales LL ee Continued Yo, Ho, Alo, No, “No, Continued 8 P 3485 Robert H Moorefield vs R B Albea & wife Continued 5300 R M Kabrick vs Ww F Mackey Seem em mee ee me me cee ee eee Se OEE —s" Continued ; 9328 Herman Mitchell vs Johnny George Waugh & C M Waugh ------ Continued ‘ 0, 8 4 P 3638 Mattie Mae Dalton et al vs Earline Dalton ------- ----- Continued 0, 4, 0 7% Cashion 1/A Star Milling Co vs Floyd Adams ---------~ Continued 0, 53 % Are Ray Electric Corp vs Oscar R Mills T/A Mills Elec Shop-ont inued IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 No. 5547 me, terete In the Guperior Court Iredell ¢ ounty th Eugen Barnette | Jury sworn and empanelled and ansy omas “ug issues submitted to it as follow: ” vs ISSUES Preston Graham l. In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: $300.00 NORTH CAROLINM IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Thomas “ugene Barnette i vs. | JUDGMENT Preston Graham ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November Civil Term of the Superior Court of Iredell eunty, and the Jury having answered the issue submitted to them as follows: In what ameunt, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff: Answer? "$300.00 Dollars". Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff hav and recover of the defendant the sum of $300,00 Dollars, together with tne costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 16th day of November, 1953. Will Pless, J ge Pres g eR Kee eK x IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 Mo. 5598 yorTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY spencer McLaughlin Plaintiff vs. Bryant G, Sherrill, Defendant ISSUE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1953 Jury sworn and empanelled and answered the isse submitted to it as follows: In what amount was the plaintiff's automobile damaged by the defendant? Anewer: $850.00. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Spencer McLaughlin, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Bryant G, Sherrill This cause coming on to be heard and being teard at the regular November term of the Iredell County Superior Court, before His Honor, J, Will Pless, Judge presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the single issue subaitted to it as follows: In what amount was the plaintiff's autemobile damaged by the defendant? Answer: ‘ight hundred and fifty dollars. Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaim iff have and recover of the defendant the sum of eight hundred and ffty dollars, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 18th day of November, 1953. 2 Beate de ge Presiding eee keke KKK EH SECOND ly ge 19 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Mond November 16, 1953 "9 : SECOND WEEK -----~- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 — ee Monday, Nevenber 16th, 1953 ‘No. 5635 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO THE SEVERAL COURTS OF THIS STATE: Claudia Hager laintiff JAMES ROBERT WALKER, JR. having applied to the undersigned, BOARD © LAW EXAMINER'S, to be examined with the view to be admitted to practice as an Louis weg a \TORNEY AND COUNSELLOR AT LAW, in said Courts: WE DO CERTIFY, that he hath produced before us such satisfactory evidence ae SNS eS Se Se RS Ss a oe eee of his upright character, and upon examination before us has been found to F the plaintiff for the appointment of a Receiver for the retail Furniture possess such competent Knowledge of the LAW as entitle him tobe so admitted. business owed by the parties, which is now being conducted under the firm trade Given under our hands, at Raleigh, the 8th day of August, 1953. name of the "Iredell Furniture Company", - and in an effort to avoid the expense ’ of Receivership proceedings the said Motion is deferred during the pleasure of the /s/_L. R. Varser “hairman, Court, and in the meantime the plaintiff, Mrs. Claudia Hager, and the defendant, /s/ Geo, B. Greene Member. Louis Hager, are authorised and appointed to operate the said business as a going /s/_Kingsland Van Winkle Member. concern, each having equal authority in the operation and mangement of the said /s/_L. 7. Hartsell, Jr. Member. business; and where the parties are able to agree among themselves upon the /s/_Buxton Midyette Member. sale price of any article in the said store and upon the Order of payment of /s/_John H. Hall Member. debts owed by the concern no record thereof need be kept. However, when there /s/_Thomas H. Leath Member. is a disagreement between the parties as to the sales price of any article, or as to the Order of payment of any debt, the Court retains the autherity t “iver L. Cannon Secretary. make determination of such questions at a later time. It is ORDERED, that @ waa) weekly report of all sales and disbursements be compiled by the plaintiff and defendant jointly, and in duplicate, both parties assenting to the correctness eof the same by their signatures. And in the event they are unable to agree @& to its correctness, each is then required to make a report of the figures in NORTH CAROLINA accordance with his own contention. Said reports to be made each calendar week, IREDELL COUNTY and filed in the office of the Clerk of Court not later than Wednesday of the following week. “ach party shall be paid a weekly salary of $35.00. I, James “obert Walker, Jr., do solemnly swear that I will support the This cause is retained for further Orders upon three days informal notice to the Attorneys of Record, This U stitution of the United States, so help me God. the 16th day of November, 1953. Ja Rob Walke Jr J, W Pl J BGGS PPCSICINE- T, James Robert Walker, Jr. do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will be “thful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the nn Const {tutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, November 16, 1953 Government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of the said State, not incmsistent With the Constitution of tne United States, te the best of my knowledge and ability, so help me, God. James Robert Walker, Jr. I, James Kobert Walker, Jr., do solemnly swear that I will truly and honestly demean myself in the practice of an attorney, according to the best of my knowledge and ability, so help me, God. James Robert Walker, Jr. James Walker, Jr. having been introduced to the Court by R. A. Hedrick ¢ Statesville, North Carolina, who presented Certificate of the Boardof Examiners of the North Carolina tate Bar that the said James Kobert Walker, Jr. had been licensed to practice the profession of law, the Court there- upon, in open court, administered the foregoing oaths which are prescribed for Attorneys at Law, and also the oath of allegiance to the State and to support the Constitution of the United States, and orders that the said James Robert Walker, Jr. be admitted to practice law in all the Counties of the State of North Carolina. The Court further orders that 4 record of the license and oaths admin’tered be recorded in the Minutes of the Court. Yone in open court, this the 16th day of November, 1953-6 J. Will Pless, Jr udge Presiding eRe KRK BKK KK OH IN THE $ UP RIOR COURT ND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 SECOND Wiionday, November 16, 1953 No. Sp 3733 ¢ Statesville @ ssleipal Corporation v8 ), L, White & wife, Ruth EB. White Jury sworn am empanelled as follows: M, W. Jones Harold Tomlinson j, 6, Wood ¢, H, Johnson Roy A, Waugh GU. C. Kistler Frank S. Nance U, H. Wilson M, T. Waugh ¥, C, McGee Frank W. Futrell Lewis %, Deaton Pending trial of this case, the Court takes a recess until ‘uesday Morning, November 17, 1953. ‘Ne. 5641 WORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT J. M. Wagner, Guardian for Sue Bettie Barringer, Margaret Deal Barringer, and Audrey W. Barringer, Jr., PLAINTIFF ti JUDGMENT Vachovia Bank an d Trust Compan Trustee U/W Frances Wagner forrineer, DEFENDANT This cause coming on to be heard, by agreement, before his Honor, J. Will less, Judge holding November Term, 1953, Court in Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that this action is brought for the purpose of seeking an interpretation fa portion of the bast Will and Testament of Frances Wagner Barringer under the Metlaratory Judgment Act; and that all the facts have been agreed upon, and the “ourt is asked to interpret the meaning of certain provisions of the Will to the "a that the Trustee may be directed in the manner in which it should carry out the intent of the testatrix in said Will, and especially that pertion em ‘eeignated as Item III, Subsection G, which authorised the Trustee to pay over the "et {neome to the person tet the care and custody of the children until such ch {ld op children reached the age of twenty-one, with the further instruction that, - Rei ap ous os ri : Z tiie cepitiacse atta cacti pO Dn 4 = me poe Salis = Sti cat a oe oe = fa lal ogee Z A ELT I IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Monday, “ovember 16, 1953 in case of an emergency or protracted illness and hospitalization, that the Trustee, if the income was not sufficient, could invade the principal to take Care ofsych emergency. The Court, having considered the facts and the wording ef the Will, Concludes that “rances Wagner Barringer provided for unusual expenses such as protracted illness and hospitalization, and that it was the intent and meaning in her use of the phrase "in case of an emergency” that she intended to take care of such occasion as might arise where the income was not sufficient to provide for the normal expenses of the care and raising of her children. The Court further finds that the Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District has heretofore approved an order of the Clerk of Superior Court, aut corizing the payment not to exceed $4,800.00 per year for the care and support; and that from all sources of income payable to the Guardian, there would be only #254.35 per month, exclusive of any income from the stock the testatrix owned in the Turner Manufacturing Company at Statesville, and at th present time it is not paying any dividends, nor can the investment be counted on as producing an annual income from year to year, and for these reasons, it is concluded that an emergency exists 8 was in comtemplation of the testatrix at the time she executed her Will, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, on the statement of facts admitted, that the Defendant be, and it is authorized to invade the principal of this Trust to provide the necessary funds for the normal living expenses of the three infant children, subject to the approva] of the expenditures by the Clerk of Superior Court o Ired.1] County. The Defendant is taxed with the cost of this action. J, W i a J No. 5455 Betty Jean Houston BNF vs Coyte E Houston ««<<-<--<------ Continued 4 No. 5513 “No. 5517 Continued Continued Dorothy Moore Leonard vs John Leonard L B Spillman vs Treaya Spillman -.- Wo. 5591 Henry Carson vs Mary Dalton Continued Carson Pere ee ane eae wen een This November M Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A, M, IN THE SUPERIOR CWRT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 17, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment en Tuesday vorning, November 17, 1953, at 9:30 A, M, No. 559% yoRTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY . H. Morrison, Sr., Administratrix or of the Estate of Ellen Minium Rowe, deceased; and Mrs. W. H, Morrison, Sr., iduall aires ais iff, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT Leroy 4, Hill, Eleanor Lawson, and all of the unknown heirs and next of kin of Ellen Minium Rowe, deceased, Defendants, j | i vs. i | i i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by his Honor J, Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding, at the November 1953 Term of the Iredell County Superior Court; And it appearing to the Court that the complaint in this cause was filed on the lst day of September, 1953; that Fred G. Chamblee was appointed Guardian ad litem to defend this cause on behalf of the unknown heirs and next of kin of fllen Minium Rowe, deceased, and that he has filed an answer in this cause; tad it alse appearing to the Court that Leroy A. Hill md Eleanor Lawson, the two named defendants were not to be found in Iredell County, North Carolina, and that the Sheriff of Iredell County made a return upon the summons issued in this cause that after due and diligent search the said Leroy A. Hill and ‘leanor Lawson were not to be found in Iredell County, North Carolina, and an fidavit was made that the said Leroy Hill and Eleanor Lawson and the other unknown heirs and next of kin of “llen Minium “owe, deceased, could not, after due and diligent search, be found in the State of North Carolina, and that the “ourt ordered the defendants, both named defendants and the unknown heirs of ‘Llen Minium Rowe, deceased, to appear within twenty (20) days after October », 1953, and answer or demur to the complaint; that notice was published in he Statesville Daily Record, a newspaper published in Iredell County, North “olina, 80 notifying the defendants to appear, on September 4, 11, 16, oad 5, 1953; that the named defendants were mailed copies of the complaint and he Will of “llen Minium “owe, deceased, but tha, the time for answering has "Pired and No other answer has been filed other than the said answer of Fred " "hemblee Guardian ad Litem for the next of kin and unknown heirs of bllen Mindum Rowe, deceased; And it further appearing to the Court that this action is brought for the ann sz en res IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 17, 1953 purpose of construing Item 4 of the Will of Ellen Minium Rowe, deceased, under the provisions of the North Carolina Decl aratory Judgment Act, and it aopearing from the pleadings that there is no issue of fact for a jury to determine ani that the Vourt is asked to rener a construction of and interpret tne said Item 4 of said Will, the said Item 4 appearing in paragraph VI of the Complaint and also in the Will which is marked "Exhibit A” and which is attache to the complaint; And the Vourt, having considered the provisions of the Will of Ellen Miniu Howe, deceased, md particularly Item 4 of said Will, and the Court having further considered the applicable North Carolina statutes and decisions, and having con cluded from such consideration that Mrs. W. H. Morrison, Sr., Administratrix c.t.ea, of the Estate of Ellen Minium Rowe, deceased, succeeded to the power of appointment civen under the provisions of Item 4 of the said Will to the Executrix and that the said Administratrix c.t.a. is entitled to exercise such power of aopointment as if she were the Executrix named in said Will; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Administratrix ¢.tt, Mrs. W, H, Morrison, Sr., the plaintiff in the above-entitled cause, has succeeded to the right and the power of appointment given to the Executrix under Item & of the Will of Ellen Minium Rowe, deceased, and the said Admini stratrix c.t.a. is entitled to exercise said power of appointment as fully and completely as the said Executrix would have been entitled to had she qualified as euch. It is further ordered that the costs of this action be paid out of the assts of the Estate of Ellen Minium Rowe, deceased, and that Fred G, Chamblee, Guardian ad Litem for all of the unknown heirs and next of kin of Ellen Minius Rowe, deceased, shall be paid for his services as such Guardian ad Litem the su of One Hundred & No/100 ($100.00) Dollars, and the firm of Land, Sowers, Ave % Ward, Attorneys for the plaintiff, shell be paid the sum of Two Hundred & No/100 (¥200.00) Dollars for legal fees for services rendered in instituting tats action and for representing the Administratrix c.t.a. in her duties #% personal representative of the deceased, This 17 day of November, 1953, J Jr Will reset —raage Fe Ging, November 1953 Term of Irede County Superior Court i ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Tuesday, November 17, 1953 fo, Sp $657 Worth Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell Vounty Annie Littlejohn and husband Harold ohn and Willie Ewell — JUDGMENT vs. Mary Connor and husband, Baldy Connor This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding at the November Vivil Term of theSuperior Court of Iredell County; and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel that all natters of cmtroversy as to establishment of liens against the property as set out in the pleadings have been agreedipon by the parties, and that both the petitiones an the defendants have agreed to drop their claims for improvements and liens; and have agreed that said property be -old. Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the claims by the petitioners and defendants be with drawn and that the lands described in the petition be sold for partition at public auction on the premises for cash, after advertising said sale as by law provided, and that any of the interested parties may become the purchaser at such sale. And, it is further ordered that Grant Jolmer am W.R. Battley be and they are hereby appoint ed Commissioners of this Court to make sale of said lands as here - in directed and report such sale to this Court for cmfirmation. J, Will Ple Jr udge Pres “his 17 day of November, 1953. vonsent: Grant Bolme ‘torney Tor petitioners +e Battle ‘orney for defendants ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 SECOND WEEK ---- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 17, 1953 tuesday, November 17, 1953 JNo. 5642 No5530 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT yoRTH CAROLINA : IN THE S UPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY IREDELL COUNTY David Little and wife, Ruby Little, Vixon, a Minor, by her anda Jean 4x0 ' } 4an Dixon, Plaintiff VS. > Vs. T., E, Deal and wife, Hattie M. Deal, ! plaintiffs, i = friend, Lil l ! —— roy Hurst defendants, tuarles Leroy ” Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless, This cause coming on to be heard befere His Honor J. Will Pless, Judge —— > we mee = _ - % ” Juige Presiding over the November 1953 regular Civil Term of the Superior Court SS holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, upon an order issued by for Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard, the plaintiff being represented core Fa His Honor, Dan R. Moore, Judge holding the Courts of the Seventeenth Judicial by her attorneys, Land, Sowers, Avery and Ward, and the defendant by his attorney, District, dated November 3, 1953, for the defendants to show cause why the i, A, Hedrick, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendant injunction prayed for by the plaintiffs in their action should not be granted have agreed upon the compromise and settlement of all matters and things in dispute until the final termination of this act’on. or controversy between them, including the matters and things set forth in the And it appearing to the Vourt from the verified Compant of the plaintiffs complaint in this action, for the sum of money hereinafter set forth; and it ee in this action used as an affidavit that there is a serious controversy as to the : further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as facts from an investigation true dividing line between the parties to this action; and that the plaintiffs Pps g . a of the circumstances, that the minor plaintiff, Wanda Jean Dixon, is a minor of are entitled to the injunctive relief asked for in their complaint. the age of approximately six years; that she appears in this action by her mother, It is, therefore, on the Motionof Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward, Attorneys lillian “ixon; that the minor plaintiff and her next friend are desirous of making aed fer the plaintiffs, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendants and each of them be enjoined and restrained from trespassing upon the land claimed by the ‘eettlenent upon the terms hereinafter set forth; and that thei efendanthas plaintiffs South of the old dividing line and that the defeniants be enjoined axl ee to pay, and the plaintiff desires to accept the sum of , restrained from interfering in any way with the plaintiffs in the use of the olf nfull complete and final compromise settlement, satisfaction, and discharge 0 farm road until the final Seminables Of thtn exties. my and all claims and demands whatsoever of the plaintiff and the minor plaintiff This 17 day of November, 1953, igainst the defendant, including the claims, demands, and cause of action set forth in the complaint herein; that the liability, if any of the defendants, is questionable; Io is Wes WE J. Will P J aa aan tt it is for th e laintiff and her next friend herein Judicial “istrict. : e best interest of the minor p “cept the sum of $173.00 in full, complete, and final compromise, settlement, : ceubee ceo Mtisfaction, and discharge of any and all claims in demand of the plaintiff and ‘Me minor plaintire against the defendant, including the claims, demands, and cause f action set forth in the complaint herein; that said sum is an adequate, fair, Mt just amount for the plaintiff and the minor plaintiff to receive in full, complete, "4 final compromise settlement, satisfaction, and discharge of all claims, and d ands of the plaintiff and the minor plaintiff against the defendant, including the Claing, demands and cause of action set forth in the complaint herein; and the “ore , Senet toning and approving said settlement; See — ] ad - i ae ae ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Tuesday, November 17, 1953 IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff haye and recover of the defendant the sum of $173.00, and the cost of this action; that the claimant have said sum of money and the cost of this action into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court, of Iredell County, North Carolina, or to the next friend, Lillian Dixon, of the minor plaintiff, Wanda Jean Dixon, for the use and benefit of the said minor plaintiff, Wanda Jean Dixon; such payment to constitute and operate as a full, complete, and compromise settlement, satis. faction, release, amd discharge of any and all claims and demands whatsoever which the plaintiff and the minor plaintiff have against the defendant, including the claims, demmds, and cayses of action set forth in the complaint in this action. Phis 17 day of November, 1953. J, Will aes Jr. udge Presiding We Vonsent: Ne S. Sower ttorney for Plaint R. A, Hedrick Attorney Tor Defendant This Honorable Vourt takes » recess until Wednesday Morning, November 18, 1953, at 9:30 o'clock A, M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Wednesday, November 18, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, iovenber 18, 1953 at 9230 o'clock A. M. DIVORCE Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: J. 0. Wood, G. H. Johnson, W. ©. McGee, Now 5424 | | Frank W. Futrell, M. W. Jones, Roy A, : iubert We Blackwood Waugh, Frank S, Nance, M.T. Waugh, Harold ‘tomlinson, C. C. Kistler, D. H, Wilson, and Lewis R, Deaton. vs Lois Laws Blackwood yoRTH CAROLINA TRNELL COUNTY IN THE YPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 dubert W. Blackwood, Plaintiff Vs. lois Laws Blackwood, Defendant 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Angwer: Yes 2, Vid the plaintiff and defendant separate amd live separate and apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for core than two years continuously rior to the institution of this action? ‘answer: Yes is 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North arolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY Yubert W, Blackwood, Plaintiff . JUDGMENT ols Laws Blackwood, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the ‘werlor Court of Iredell bunty, North Carolina, before His Honor J. Will ‘leu, Jp. Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the ‘neues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against ™ defendant, a8 set out in the records. Tt is, tjerefore, ordered, and adjuiged by the Vourt that the bente * tatrinony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Hubert W. eter, a the defendant, Lois Laws Blackwood, be and the same are dissolved, and the rl invite is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. ge Presiaing ac keke ea HF /No. 5065 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Fred W, Hudson VS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Wednesday, November 18, 1953 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER, 1953 Term Moor Food Store, Inc. R. M. Linker, receiver, Moor Food Store, Inc., respectfully shows the Yourt that the the receivershi From Old Nov. 13, '53 July 3 Aug 13 Aug 20 Nov. 14 Nov. 14 Nov. 14 Nov. 14 following is a true and accurate account of the transactions of p from November 12, 1952, to November 14, 1953. Balance in Bank, November 13, 1952 $1307.51 Receipts bank account-First Nationa] Bank 8.7 e/ Mrs. Effie Flowers Estate - payment of Chattel Mortgage 1197,00 TOTAL - Bank Balance & Receipts $2513.30 Visburgements William R, Pope, Attorney's fee by order of Court $ 250.00 North Carolina Intangible Tax on Bank Account 1.39 R. M. Linker-last 2 weeks employee's salary 110.00 Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorney's fee by order of Vourt 150,00 Local Insurance Co. Receiver's Bond 30.00 Vuke Power Company - electricity during operation of receivership . . 31.46 Ww. C, Johnston Company - assignment of remai:ing salary be 75 due to W. Ross Day - “+ Johnston Company - rent on equisment durin Operation of receivership ’ ' “ R. M, Linker, 2 weeks sali vw ; duri receiv ership ary for operating store duritg Balance in Bank 1 Total Disbursements & Bank Balance $2513 «30 “his 16 day of November, 1953. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Sworn to (SEAL) My commission expires: 3/24/54 Vonfirmed and aporoved this 18 day of Nov, Kk. M, Linker Receiver and subscrbed before me this 16 day f¢ November, 1953. J.C, Sherrill, Jr, ~ Notary Publie 1953. J. Will SH a udge Presiding we IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Wednesday, November 18, 1953 flo. 5065 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT fred W. Hudson I Pe i FINAL JUDGMENT Voor Food Store, Inc. i This cause coming on to be heard on motion of R, M, Linker, Receiver for Moor Food Store, Inc., and it appearing to the Court that this action was duly instituted, and that notice to creditors of said action was duly published as provided by law; that the Receiver has paid all secured claims, taxes and operating expenses, and now has a balance on hand in the sun of $1720.90; that notice to creditors of this motion was duly given as provided by law; and upon this cause coming on to be heard no creditors appeared in person or through attorney and made objection to this motion. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the receiver, Rk, M, Linker, first pay the plaintiff, Fred W. Hudson, the sum of $100.00 for two months compensagion prior to the institution of this action; vharles Mack And Sons, a preferred creditor, the sum of $35.30 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from May 17, 1951; that the receiver, , M, Linker, be allowed a commission of 5% of the recei pts and disbursements, amounting to the sum of $377.50; that William R. Pope be paid a balance of attorneys fee in the sum of $100.00; that the cost of this action be paid as determined by the Clerk of this Court including the notice of this ‘ction published in the Mooresville Tribunej and that the balance of the fusds on hand be paid pw rata among general creditors of the Moor Food Store, Ine, It is further orfered that upon the disbursements above set out having been made, the receiver, R. M. Linker, be discharged of further duties in this action, and that the Moor food Store, Inc. be and is hereby declared to be a dissolved corporation, This the 18 day of November, 1953. J. Will Ple Jr ge Presiding eee KH KH KK HK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Wednesday, November 18, 1953 “No. 5544 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY T. H. Davis, Jr., Pyaintiff, vs. R, W. Davis, dr., Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard on motion of the defendant to make additional party, and being heard, and it appearing to the Vourt that upon the existing state of the pleadings that the motion should not be allowed, It is therefore ordered that the motion be denied at the present time without prejudice to the defendant renewing this motion upon amendment of his ‘urther “nswer and Defense, Counter claim and Cross Action. It is further ordered that the defendant be allowed 30 days in which to amend his further Answer and Jefense, Counter Claim and Cross Action. This the 18 day of November, 1953. J. Will Pless, Jr Judge Presiding a a ee No. 5609 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDFLI COUNTY A. P. Stedman and C. A. Sykes, Plaintiffs -VS- “-W. Scott, L. B, L and L. V, Coggins, yerly, efendants. This cause coming on to be heard Judge J, Wi)) Pless, » and being heard before his Honor Judge P ucge “residing, upon.a demurrer and motion to strike filed by defendant 8, upon the hearing of the motion, reading the pleadings, and argument of Co unsel, the Vourt is of opinion that the demurrer to the Complaint and t i ig he Motion to Strike should be over ruled and dissolved S, THEREFORE E} , ae » ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED, that the demurrer oe : Prd the motion to strike Are den} a. This the 18th day , of November, 1953, J, Will Pless, Jr - Presidi ng Falae. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «----~ NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Wednesday, November 18, 1953 APPEAL ENTRIES. To the action of the Court in over-ruling the Demurrer and Motion to strike the defendants except: To the signing of the Order overruling the Demurrer and motion to strike, the defendants except and give notice in open court of appeal to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Further notice waived. Appeal bond set in the amount of $100, The defendants are allowed 45 days in which to make up and serve their case on appeal, Thisl@th day of November, 1953. J. Will aes Jr. udge presiding. ee eR KR Kk No. 1967 LARCENY State The judgment of the Court is that the tne defendant be confined in the Common Jail of que Jarvis Iredell County for the term of Twelve (12) a Months, and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $75. aw the costs of this action on or before the 15th day of January, 1954. 2. That he be and remain of good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for three (3) Years; otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent termd this Court. ‘Ho, an LARCENY ‘8 The judgment of the Court is that the defen- Williem Leyi T dant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Wejg °V4 frivette County for the term of twelve (12) Months, and assigied to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $75. and the costs of this action on or before the 15th day of January, 1954. 2. ‘That he be and remain of good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for three (3) Years; otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of this Court. LARCENY The judgmnt of the Court is that the defen- dant be confined in the Common Jajl of Iredell County for the term of = (ia) oe an assigned to work on the roads under the super~ vieiea of the State Highway and Public works Commission. This sentence is suspended on the following conditions: l. t he pay the costs of this action on or before the 15th day of January, 1954. (Continued on page 1 i i ; aN 4 ‘Ne. 1968 State vs Bristol Rash W- 38 “Ne. 1970 State vs R, B. Holland W- 33 j No. Sp 3733 City of Statesville vs D. L. White and wife IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- NOVEM Wednesday, November 18, 1953 BER TERM, 1953 LARCENY (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 163) 2. That he be and remain of goo behayi and not veers any of the laws of the tne for three (3) years; otherwise capias to issy put the prison sentence into effect at ay subsequent term of this court, LARC: NY The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be canfined in the Common Jai) of Iredell County for the term of Twelve (12) months, and assigned to work on the reads under the Supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended on the following conditions: 1. That he pay the costs of this action on or before the 15th day of January, 195), 2. ‘hat he be and remain of good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for three (3) Years; otherwise capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect at any subsequent term of this Court, What amount, if any, are the petitioners entitled to recover from the City of Statesville, for the proposed easement over the lands of Respondents? $950.00 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville. a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff vs D. L, White and wife. R E. White, ~ Defendants THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard J. Will Pless, Jr, Superior Court tion as required | ond and the Court finding as a fact that all the preliminaries vo and provided for by the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT and being heard before the Honorable and a jury in the November Term of the Iredell County d charter of the City of Statesville ® te la ws of the State of North Carolina thereto appertaining have been complied with, and the jury f after hearing all the evidence offered by both the plaintif IN THE S UPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----=- NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Wednesday, Movember 18, 1953 e defendants has returned a verdict for the defendants and against and th the plaintiff which verdict awarded damages on account of said condemnation and for the taking of the easement as described in the plaintiff's Petition to the defendants and aga:nst the plaintiff in the sum of NINE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($950.00). It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed tliat the defendants recover of the plaint:** the sum of NINE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS with interest fron date until paid as complete and final damages for the easement sought to be condemned as described in said Petition. It is further directed that of the recovery, H. P. Grier, Jr. be paid the sum of FIFTY-SEVEN DOLLARS ($57.00) and from the balance the defendants be paid each one-half (4) ¢ the recovery. it is further ordered that upon payment of the sum of NINE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($950.00) with interest from date, and the cost of this action, that the lands belonging to the defendants as described in the Petition be, and the same are hereby encumbered with a permanent easement and right-of-way in favor of the plaintiff for the uses and purposes set out in said Petition; that said permanent easement as acouired by the plaintiff be, and tle same is, as more particularly described as follows: DESCRIPTION BEGINNING at a point in the West margin of 7th Street, said point lying South . * ga West 135.5" from the imporecetion, of he oo* prea car and the South i leigh Avenue; thence Nort - ° : thence gouth 650° is mins eet 296" to the East margin of 8th Street; thence North §" = 45 min. East 18": thence North 652 - 15 min. East 291.8'; thence tending from the West nerein of 7th street eo fhe Last margin of Beh street. It is fwther directed and ordered that a copy of this judgment, together with a copy of the Petition be certified to the Register of Deeds of Iredell C ounty to the end that a permanent record of the rights of the Petitioner may be recorded in said office. this the 18 day of November, 1953. J, Will Pless, dr. Jud ge Presid ing a ee ee se i i a aaa re oi t 7% a eee if i x iE “eS | tc Sia mee eS a -aGaiaaabramaae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----= NOVEMBER TERM, 1953 Wednesday, November 18, 1953 ‘ 5326 Thomas H White vs Herbert D Wooten & Joyce Wooten --.. Continued "No. 5372 JR Cashion T/A Star Milling Co vs A A Setzer ------... Cont inued JNo. Sp 3589 Mrs. L, O, Williams & Clyde L Williams vs Myrtle . Williams & husband e----e+ee--e--senenenneenenneeeenn= Continued ‘No. Sp 3590 Mrs L O Williams vs M:rtle Williams & husband ----.. Continued (No. 5422 LC Miller vs A Banks Culp Continued Naxxikickx RoxRxampronx PXAxtompeanxkiarkxiaxiempanyrxe xxi xteferthy QrenxcxRxalx Rama k key XRENEXAREMKEX-~-------------------- tot 5480 Ruth Ellen *ogleman vs Carl W Murdock, Admr W Scott Murdock et al ----<-<-- meme wee eenecewoeoes= Yontinued 5537 Vilara Williams vs Varl W Murdock, Admr W Scott Murdock dec et a] sonnnennenn----ne---= woe ererece= e----- Conti nued 5485 C W Beaver vs Joe ~ownes & Stokes Blackwell <----- Vontinued 5490 J P Goforth vs James W White---------------- -Continued by Consent 5496 MG Givens vs Donald Goforth ------<------ wor eenen---- -- Continued 5538 Ralph Brown vs 1 “ “segins & L B Lyerly T/A Kannapolis Bakery et al - Cont inued 5542 Lewis H Winecoff vs Yates S White Continued ‘No. 5554 Mrs Lona M Overcash vs Neal Blackwelder, Infant; “ U Blackwelder & wife Conti nued “No. Sp 3708 Harvey Harris vs Mrs Nina H Powell --- Continued ‘No. 5565 Margie G McDaniel vs William F Gryder ----- cone qcecce -- Continued ‘No. 5566 Hoyle D McDaniel vs William F Gryder eaeeecoosco eccecee Continued ‘No. 5575 Roberta Goforth Pierce BNF MC Goforth vs Bobby Franklin Pierce -~--.- wr ewww we www ewww ewes ene n en eeens=e- Vont inued "No. 5604 “ula Myers Hayes vs William G Hayes ------------------- Continued ‘No. 5023 llis 4 Bailey T/A The Hudson Bailey Paint vo vs Wm D Fox T/* The Mack Fox Paint Co oonenccceccacecces-- Continued /Wo. 5596 gTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDE LL g. M. LOWRANCE AND WIFF, SARAH WRANCE A. LO ? PLAINTIFFS vs WAN INVESMENT COMPANY, a Cor- ceetten, KETNER'S, INCORPORATED, a Corporation, md BARGER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Corporation, DEFENDANTS This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial Vistrict, and it appearing to the Court that the mtters and things in controversy between the parties hereto have been Compromised and settled and that a judgment of nomsuit has heretofore been entered in this action; and it further appearing to the Court that for said reasons the restraining order hereto- fore entered herein shoud be dissolved; IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the restraining order granted in this action on the 3rd day of september, 1953, be and the same is hereby vacated and dissolved, and that the costs of the action be paid as provided for in said judgment, This 14 day of October, 1953. Dia ce we rsesSs, ve ‘Hoiding tne vourts of Judicial vistrict , A ~ RY NSUNT. Grant Bolmer ——- A. R, Battley Attorneys for Plaintil?’s Sillien S, Neel —_——- = Linn & Shuford Attaneys for Ue fendants xx ee ee KKK H /No.w 552k NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court IREDELL COUNTY Van B. Ingram, trading as Southen Asphalt Roof ing Company Plaintiff vs. JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Maggie Scott, Alias Mrs. leo Scott, et al. Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable CU, G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Varolina, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel for the plaintiff that the matters and things in controversy between the plaintiff and the defendants have been settled and that tne plaintiff desires to have this judgment voluntarily non-wuited. Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is and he ishereby granted judgement of voluntary non-suit, This the 3lst day of October, 1953. UV. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court vonsented to: Land, Sowers, Avery & Ward By W. I. Ward, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff “ex ee KR KK K No. 5615 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. The Central Mutual Insur ce C a Corporation, - — Plaintiff, Lewis William Duncan and Glover Java Pace, Defendants, I ! Vs. i I ! ‘ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorabl C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it me to the Court from the the statement of the Attomeys for the Plaintiff that to matters ad things in controversy have been settled between the parties the complete satisfaction of the Plaintiff; and that the Plaintiff elects to take a Judgment of Nonsuit in its action; IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff be, and it is hereby nonsuited; that the cost of the action be taxed against the Plaintiff by the Clerk of the Court, Signed and entered in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Noventer 10, 1953. C. G, Smit Ut, ite Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell 2 ounty. ee KOK ROK RK KR OK Ok & “WO. 54,82 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mrs. A, P. Head , Plaintiff vs Cecil Ray Harris and Edith Corinne Head, Defendants ! I I l i THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from thestatement of Counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendant, Cecil Ray Harris, has agreed to pay to the plamtiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept of ai from him the sum of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) and one-half (4) of the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction of any claim, right, or privilege arising under or out of this action; and the defendant, Edith Corinne Head, has agreed to pay to the plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept of and from her the sum of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) and one-half (4) of the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction of any claim, right, or privilege ‘rising under or out of this action; NOW, THEREFORE, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, Cecil Ray Harris, the sum of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) and one-half of the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clemk; and it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, Edith Corinne Head, the sum of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) together with one-half of the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 10 day of November, 1953. CG. 6. & ee eR mpertor Court iting inal 2 je Re ao hecho ain NNN Se. eg : ae ——— & a a roth Consented to by: Jo. 5577 Baxter H, Finch Wm. I, Ward. J NORTH CAROLINA ttorney for the Plaint ttorney for the Defendant Cecil Ray Harris IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Scott, Collier & Nash ttorney for the Defendant John W. Moore and Mrs. Cc Head M, Shannon By Me Lees ” — Plaintiffs v8 JUDGMENT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ee KR RR KR OK Ok Ro Re we & ¥, L, Westmoreland, Defendant | This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superie ‘No. 5633 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Vourt of Iredell County, and being heard, ard it appearing from the Statement of counsel that all matters and things in controversy between the parties have IREDELL COUNTY been compromised and settl ed; Wayne Ashe, Plaintiff, It is therefore, on motion of J. G. Lewis, Attorney, for the plaintiffs, vs. JUDGMENT ordered, adjudged and decreed that this cause be and the same ighereby none Fay Alfred Gilbert, suited and dismissed. Defendant. This 2lst day of November, 1953. CC. G. Smith This matter coming on to be heard d being heard before the Honorable . a Clerk of Superior Court Carl G. Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it By consent of: appearing to the Court that a Complaint was filed in this action on the J, G, Lewis 28th day of October, 1953; that no Answer was filed by the defendant, and ttorney forPlaintiffis that the time for answering has not expired; and that it further appearing "eee e ee eee to the Court upon statement of the attorney for the plaintiff that the ‘No. matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties; and 0 558) N that the plaintiff has elected to take a non-suit in his action; orth Carolina In i. oe ry Tre It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the dell County plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the C. C. BROWN T/A Clerk, Service O11 Co, vs SHERIFF'S I ! | REPORT OF EXECUTION SALE OF ATTACHED PROPERTY ! This 16th day of November, 1953. ) ‘ate CHRISTENBURY 1/A Clerk of Sassrior Court n Acres |{ °ONSENTED TO: C. G. SMITH, CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY: Fred G. Chamble Pursuant to Warrant of Attachment issued on the llth day of August, ttorney for the aint : 1953, & order of judgment dated Oct. 20, 1953, and after due advertisement . "8 required by law, I sold the property of the defendant which had been attached RR RHR ee em by me, the Sheriff of IredellCounty, in the above entitled action; that said Property was sold at public auction, for @sh, to the highest bidder, at Green “Tes located on the Mooresville=Charlotte Highway at the Mecklenburg County line, "Monday, November 23, 1953, at 12:00 o'clock; that the following is a report of the sale, showing the proceeds received from the sale of the attached property and the disbursements of the same. = (Cpe) RECEIPTS F gale of attached property in the above entitled action, as gho taventery on file in office of the Clerk of Superior Court tredel} Coals $383.00 DISBURSEMENT: 7 lock - R. E. Perkins eeoerereeeeoeoeeeeoeseeees $ 59 J. E. Smith, auctioneer ....+-e5heeeeeeees. 16.15 Sheriffs Commission on receipts ...e.eeee-. 8 Total disbursements ....ssesesee $ Z ¥, G. Smith, CSC, balance of proceeds from sale for principal, interest and costs in above action eoereeereesreoeee eee eeeeeeeeeeeeeese 1.68 8 00 Balance Weesoeoecoosees None Respectfully submitted this the 24th dayaf November, 1953, J. C, Rumpl Wheril? of Tredell County Subscribed and sworn to before me By__Sue McLean Ds this the 24th day of November, 1953. C. G. Smith Ulerk of Superior court of Iredell County. eee eK KK Ke Ke KK HK “No. 5627 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk R, E, Evins and John T. Gill, ‘ t/a Statesville Gin Company Plaintiffs, | Vs. | JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT ! | R. C, Church, Individual, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior C ourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, and i appearing to the Vourt from the statement of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorney! for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have dee ne settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary n0 suit: IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, and that the as of plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of Court. This 25th day of November, 1953. C. G, Smi e Clerk of Superior court ort County, North Carolina. CONSENTED To: Adams, Dearman and | ‘inb Attorneys for the Plaintifr’ *Y'__Monroe Adama ue RHR KR ee KK He Jo 5619 RTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NO! IREDELL COUNTY Carolina Tractor & Equipment voupeny = Plaintiff - JUDGMENT QOPNONMSUIT H, A. Johnson Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, C, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County, North Caroling and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff that the matters and things herein pending which were the subject of this action have now been settled and that the plaintiff desires to take a non-suit in this action. Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be non-suited and the above-entitled action be dismissed. this 25 day of November, 1953. U, G, Smith Clerk of Superior Yourt Vonsented to: he and, Sowers, Avery & Ward Kttorneys for Pleietiit By Wm 1, Ward, Jr. Wo. 5628 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Town of Mooresville vs. JUDGMENT FOR NON-SUIT | j vlay Brewer and wife, i 8. Clay Brewer ' This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor C, G, Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard, and it "ppearing that the amount sued for on account of street assessment, together With the interest thereon, has been apid in full; and it further appearing ‘hat the plaintiff has been reimbursed for the cost advanceds It is, therefore, on motion of Z. ¥. Turlington, Attorney for the Plaintiff, ordered and adjudged that this action be, as the sme is hereby NOn-suited, This the 3 day of December, 195). uperior Vourt laintiff ERE) hs - 7. a acm 2 ~ a ee g Me if Me i = KL es — SS P: — : JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLIN Se. ssa/ = Neil S. Sowers VS. No. 384 Home-Made Chair Co., Inc. and L. 0, “ibson, M. W. Gibgon, and M. B. Brosius, Individually, and as Stockholders, Officers = Directors @& the Home Made Vhair Vompany, nC « Fall Term, 1953, Iredell County, This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the recon from the Superior Court Iredell Vounty: Upon consideration whereof, this Vourt is of opinion that there is no error in the record and proceedings of saii Superior Court. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable Emery B. Denny Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED And it is considered and adjudged further, that the plaintiff and sureties to the appeal bond Roy R. Sherrill and Jessie 5. Sowers do pay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, to-wit, the sum of Twenty-five and 80/100 dollars ($25.80), gnd execution issue tlrefor. oe cre ees sgn cca erk oO e Supreme Vout. mow ow Ke ke om /No. 5629 NOR TH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Mount Airy Mantel and Table Company, ncorporated , laint:ff, vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Hager, trading and doing busi Iredell Furnit ure Compa, - I | i Lewis E. Hager and Ulai¢ia toml:y | ' Defendants, i ) This cause coming on to be heard, and bdng heard before the under signed “lerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolin, , it appearing to the Court from the Statement of Adams, Vearman ont Vise A “torneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this to action have been settled and compromised, and that t he plaintiff - take a voluntary nonsuit: tice *T IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDER"D, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, wp ® of “dens, Dearman and “inberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, thet - laint Pra’ntiff’ be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated a8 % yoluntary nonsuit, and tht the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of Yourt. This the 8th day of December, 1953, C, G. Smith Clerk of Super ior Court of lred@il County, North Carolina. CONSENTED TO: Adams, Dearman & Winberry Atttorneys for the Phintiff, By:__Monroe Adame " ie x ew KK OK KR Ke kK em lo. $6 #4 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell © ounty R, E, Jackins, Plaintiff JUDGMENT J, P, Wike, | { | Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that no answer has been filed and that the time for answering has not expired; And it further appearing from the statement of Counsel for the Plaintiff that the Defendant hes agreed to pay to the Plaintiff andthe Plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) in full accord and satisfaction of all claims, mattere and things complained of in the Plaintiff's complaint; and that the Plaintiff has elect ¢ totale @ monsuit in his action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed what the plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 8day of Vecember, 1953. C, UG. Smith Ulerkof the Superior Yourt Consented to: pied ed G, Chamblee Prec vt vhamblee, Attorney for laintirf eek KK KH ie i 7 i ‘ Se ics, cakeeeiineal liieeknant ah att ees i i ; s] ti ' 7 7 bie u pe ae 1 ‘ ii 1) aR AD i i ioe ' 5 , ¥ be yt y : a4 ' ff ye Be P a Hi 1! ; ibe a ; i tl iy iW ; dE rr le <i s ea er 3 My - ie aaa a) bd LU rf a ea) fe — = Fx Sat? + ib —— a2 ie PS eee Ot 2 See eee z ee No. 1834 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF IREDELL IN THE SUPERIOR couRt DOCKET NO. 183, State of North Carolina rn ORDER REVOKING PROBATION Nelson Curlee Land, Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard on December 9, 1953 in Extra Civil Term of Vabarrus County Superior Court before the Honorable Peyton McSwain, Judge Presiding, upon the report of State Probation Ufficer Everett L. McBryde, the defendant being in Court in person WHEREUPON the Court finds the fcllowing facts: 1, “hat at the May 1&, 1953 Term of Iredell County Supericr Court, Statesville, N.C. the above named defendant entered gplea of euilty to thecrime of Forrible Trespass and was sentenced to serve Twelve Months in jail, te be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works vommission of North Carolina, which sentence was suspended and the defendant placed on probation for e period of Three Years under the supervision of the North Varolina Probation Commission and its Officers under the general conditions of probation and the followinr special conditions: 1. Not loaf or loiter any place of public entertainment, 2. Pay half the cost by the Angust 1952 Term and half by the November 1953 Term into the Clerk of Superior Court's office. 2. The above named defendant has wilfully violated the following conditions of probation: Subject has changed place o& residence without the permission of the Probation Officer. Subject has failed tc report as directed. Subject was tried and convicted on December 8, 1953 in Iredell vounty Recorder's Court of Aiding and Abetting in Possession of One-Half Gallon of non-tex paid liquor; sentenced to four months on the roads, suspended on condition that he pay $25.00 and costs. IT Is, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the probation be and is hereby REVOKED and the sentence heretofore suspanded of Twelve “onths in jail, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission of North Carolina, is ordered into effect. This the 9th day of December, 1953. Sten ererotNe eK He ee RK we HK ‘No. 1880 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL satin is; ms State of North Carolina -vs- George M, Smith — Defendant I i ORDER REVOKINC PROBATION 1 | THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard on December 9, 1953 in the Extra Civil Term of Cabarrus County Supaior court before the Honorable Peyton McSwain, Judge Presiding, upon the report of State Probation Officer Everett L. MeBryde, the defendant being in Court in person WHEREUPON the Court finds the following facts: 1. ‘that at the May 19, 1953 Term of Iredell County Superior Court the above named defendant entered a plea of cuilty to the crime of operating a Motor Vehicle without the Permission and Consent of the Owner and the vourt continued prayer for jud ment and placed the defendant on probation for a period of Three Years under the supertision of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its Officers under the general conditions of probation and the followe- ing specia] condition: Pay half the cost by the 4ugust 1953 Term of Superior Court and pay half the cost by the November 1953 Term of Superior Court. 2. That on May 19, 1953 while this Officer was makinr a pre- sentence investigation, subject gave false information and also denied ever having been in trouble before. After subject was placed on probation, I learned that subject had been placed on probation on April 18, 1952 in Mecklenburg County Superior Court by Honorable Susie Sharpe, for Larceny of an Automobile and was sentenced to six months in a First Offender's Camp, 3. The above named defendant has wilfully violated the following emdition of probation: Subject has failed to report as directed. IT IS, THR EFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the probation be and is hereby REVOKED and the sentence of 4 months on roads imposed on this date by the Honorable Peyton hicSwain is hereby ordered into effect. “his the Oth dav of Jecember, 1953. aia " \ itt vil 1 Pineda) oy — Ry We Ais} | / ‘ 1 | i wan) 4 ih. 3 } Sew = + : STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR cour? COUNTY OF IREDELL. DO. NO. 1621 STATE OF NORTH C AROLINA vs. ! NED DEVON MILLER t IT APPEARING TO THE COURT that at the November 1951 Term of the Superior Court ofIredell County the defendant, Ned Devon Miller, entered a plea of cuilty to the crime of breaking, entering and larceny; that he was sentenced to serve two to three years in ~rison, whch sentence was suspended for a period of two years and defendant placed on probation for that period: After due consideration of all facts in case, the Court orders hearing continued to February 1954 Term cf Alexander Count’ Superior Court on comdition that deferdant be of good behavior ani violate no cadition of probation judgment and that he pay into the office of the vlerk of Surerior Court of +redell County the sum of $105.51 for reimbursement to County for expenses incident to defendant's return to North Carolina from Cleveland, Ohic, to answer violations of probation judgment; that upon meeting said conditions as herein set out, defendant to be discharged fom the »robation judement at Februsry 1954 Term of Alexander County Superior Court; that said defendant make bond in the amount of $300.00 for his appearance at the February 1954 Term of Alexander Gounty Superior Vourt. This the 16th day of December, 1953. Frank M, Arms irom — xt ‘he ISTRINCG, SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, FIFTBENT: JUDICIAL DISTRICT. wm wm me mw mk me om om No. 5636 NORTH CAROLINA. In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk A, Krome & Company, Incorporated, Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT and doing business as Keith Department Store, i ! i Arthur Keith Shealy, tenting 3 ! Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being seard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Varolira, on this 17th day of December, 1953, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: allie That. on October 30, 1953, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. o2e That summons was issued from this Court on October 30, 1953, to the Yheriff of Iredell Dunty, and was returnable as provided by law. @3- That the summons was served on the defendant by R. E. Perkins, Deputy *heriff of Iredell County, on November 16, 1953, by leaving with the defendant & copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. aha That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. -5- That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum °ertain in money due for merchendise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized statement, verified, marked "Exhibit A", was attached to, and made a Part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the transact! on. =6e= That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the i vemized verified statement attaclied to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the gale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's Statement Mo, 5502 A marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Eleven Hundred Dollars and no cents NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ban Hil iid : t ¥ 14 RRR ae Me HR Hd. ($1,100.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK re Aen | ; EHH PEt per annum fron December 3. 1952, until paid. Winifred Oscar Wright j : at IT 1S, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the ia SURGHENT t : plaintiff recover of the defendant, Arthur Keith Shealy, trading an doing Maxine Gladys Wright ! | ciness as Keith's Vepartment Store, the sum of Eleven Hundred Dol) i | ; ars This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the thy ani no Cents,($1,10°.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of i undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North eiy per cent rer annum from Decenber 3, 1952, until paid, together with Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to t octe of this action taxed by the vourt. arhal it ae take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks tht they He P Thie the 17th dav of December, 1953. a be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court C. SG. Smith = Clerk of Superior court of that the plaintiff has that right; | Iredell County. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being alloved to it a i] il i nt x « k& &* KR wx «( xk & : hae | Yo. $388 take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court Hs!" ee j bit ; JUDGMENT that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, hil it | hi TORE RETE 4 SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA This the lst day of January, 1954. Tn Larry 0, Shives | Fall Term, 1953 C. G. Smith | it VS. No. 378 Iredell County vierk Superior Court James /. Sample and W. WwW. Winters i t/a S & W Trucking Co. i eee ee 4 eS 8 £F Tii's cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record ‘No. 5246 from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, tals NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT surt is of opinion that there is -+ error in the record and proceedings ¢ IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE cLERK Statesy seid Sunerior Court, ides Company | ; HH ; vs JUDGMENT i}, | It is therefore, cowpidered and adfu.ged by the sourt here that the : I JUDGMENT Hs | “. L. Shoem& er ( “- a . — . — ° " 7 .. Opinion of the Ceurt , as delivered by the Honorable Jeff. Ve Johnson, ’ ’ : . ha tm vustice, he cer fie Oo t} id Su ior vour to t intent that . . certified to the said Superior vourt, to the This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the J DGW ENT TS REV ) ; : < ~ a n g 4 ud ad ' irther that ut un “ VERSED And it is considered ani adjudged iu ’ dersiened Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing plaintiff dopay tt ‘ of t real i is Court inc to the ¢ : r e costs of the anreal in this Court in he Court that summons and claim and delivery were issued on March 5, 1952 t reid rr" Tw, ana / 9 yy 3 - ner the sum of Two and 70/100 dollws ($2.70), and execution issue t and that the Sheriff's return made on March 6, 1952 shows that no proj erty W 48 taken by him; tht the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; A r ik S Pp ; J ae wLon ellie ree et he Supreme court. It is, therefore, ordered, gdjudged and decreed that the act ton be and the same is hereby nonsuited and the plaintiff taxed with the Filed in office of Sle rk 1 County on the 5th ” Costs, Superior Court af lredel of January, 1954 : This the Ist day of January, 1954. C, G, Smith ; Tourt CG. G, Smith Cy G. Seth et Clerk Superior Court eee KK Kk OK KH kee Ke eK HK HK oo tar oe 2s! 2 ete ete ee a ee 6 es ¥\4 4 wd . i a f ‘ 4 : hela a ; d 1 4 i q | i i ¥ en ) i 4 : s ; } ' \ I “ i t | wet ; : Le vie " i # { ; ! i iia} i} } aL ‘ | i i ' | 4 : j 4 ; F n . Salads that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiffts statement marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Eleven Hundred Dollars and no cents (31,100.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 3, 1952, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Arthur Keith Shealy, trading and doing business as Keith's Department Store, the sum of Lleven Hundred Dollars and no Cents, ($1,100.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 3, 1952, until paid, together with coets of this action taxed by the vourt. This the 17th dav of December, 1953. C. G, Smith Vlerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Fall Term, 1953 No. 378 Iredell County Larry 0. Shives VS. I X James M, Sample and W. W. Winters | t/a S & W Trucking Co. This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion that there is -- error in the record and proceedings ¢ said Superior Court. It is therefore, cosidered and adjuiged by the vourt here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable Jeff. D. Johnsm, Ut, Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS REVERSED And it is considered ani adjudged further, that tae plaintiff dopay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, t0 wit, the sum of Two and 70/100 dollars ($2.70), and execution issue therefa A TRUE COPY Adrian J, ‘ewton Clerk of the Supreme vourte day Filed in office of Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County on the 5th C. G. Smith C, Gs Saith come “ee he ee mh mH of January, 1954, Mo, 5502 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Winifred Oscar Wright vs Maxine Gladys Wright This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, and comes into this Court and asks tht they be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has that right; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby nonsuited, the plaintiff being alloved to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, This the lst day of January, 1954. C, G, Smith Clerk Superior Court ‘Wo. 5246 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Statesville Gin Company vs JUDGMENT t. L. Shoemax er This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersiened Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing ‘o the Court that summons and claim and delivery were issued on March 5, 1952 and that the Sheriff's return made on March 6, 1952 shows that no proj erty "as taken by him; tht the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the “tion be and the same is hereby nonsuited and the plaintiff taxed with the Costs, This the Ist day of January, 1954. UG. G, Smith Clerk Superior Court “eee KK eK