The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1952 Microfilmed by North Carolina Bepartment of Archives and History Division of Archives and Manuscripts Kaleigh, North Carolina IREDELL COUNTY eR GRU ROLLE a) MIN DOCKET S C VOL 30° YEARS (951 19513 NGS oS) ee 1113) nn > Yc Ac RED RATIO 16 1_ QWye, Locar oe ie - . Wryonder, Fue ~~ £29, 121~) 997 o is = St s ae i Qs estes Baits rtn « CF 426 ink " Oe, Milduh Menger. ZS — ~ _ i Jab s32r,13F ) Qtce, Reba ID 137, BT, 198,85 1 9, 198 257 IP ; Pics € wel La, 133, /35— ; plazer doar elwe G lo- A dang ay? Oar o_o - Aiate -ASip Pic Ton Pioch acts 4.36 3 a Aske, oA AS2 led Oley ang ohn wm. - 3// Ondumsen, 4% - 582 om OP Ran aeers C leruw Ce 332. id st a, tno , OWL Awake ual — Qhuwe, Du Fryhla. 407 al —., y/3, gee i ANB, Elctic log. - 429 ¥ fins Renssle. Bry Pew Av V.dre 47 a hie ‘inne Lepr a “ 4 — 4f G5 { ne 4 { r in " iC aed P w ! f . | Aj ~ we “ * b- | Brrocurn, Aree a 16 Bradshac (hala g_ 522 sia | Be fal, LY. A. — 226,124, 186, AIM, Hb? Sok ; D Glacduntle , Wane C- ZF) as y§6, 339 a Z OW: - 27 ,128— 186, aty, ho], 52 2 ’ abe, Oh Candas. Z4. D Buwet, 7.8 - 67-6 | Bripren, Robert J. cer Biame Water - wi 456 | vary, Sak 2. 556 347 i , . faawer, Cal, Y-s67 ne " f yore 2 £2 2 : m ' » pre Reve Coe 1 2 Be £. 7. $77 " feel Po _ 2287 134, 198, F9F, 357 | a ase, 133 ae — per Len. “eB (42 lovey Ps Lowe eer KR MSa--19F Limcer, plover Uh, -/6 9 a: p amunck — de ylorw &- /7?7, /47, BIY 370,52 aul ee B- /70 a £. 193 | , Claas mee- In 2/kx Si GA Dne.nhh'y i Kull, jar wv). a #7 S hamasnnsy, Ran - 390 f Pree, Atan Fundhy -~W7- Hd | b tau, Ww re Plan- $2 Prams, Kirche d - 344, 447, STH ak O abthenas Sy, ¥/0 Va at Wore mm. Ys ’ pat EO BE Ee eee ae basse dh. SKS | | Yafaat 7.7002 391, Fo ' asides Chih gnc, _ $83,573 ao a Sr , A tae 0: Bis c kee i ad peel | é , Wa bhi. wre, sve ile Ponca i e | Ss Beacons, Chaka Qi, - #¢ HER. | bk Led A- “8 g fees. CAA, Gro WJ. SAF r Conse, i: aan | 2 Brn, fot ater - SUZ 4 ee *< “3 . al Ane BBR EAE AR 2S 2 BE BAS ‘Chad, Artta Bell—- 25104, 13875 xs soe A, eden ~~ 26, 957 1187/43 “tLormbars, waelhar be - 26,1257 j7, /I5 Cdarb, Soon Gui. 27 Lo Chagmen, ditrw+ Werryy 21-33, ae Cah, Jorn watford. - 3%, av Crain, Of aru Sah - 62-6F (’ Ltwwicescer— C Inc. .- 64, 6 C pte. 2G an oe Pe C Rake - FL € . Trou - 9S C 4 rer @- sol, Jo8 Campbatl achao~ KR. /77 a are c KA, Bard - 734 Cbameor, (po z 437 Cirrereat pramie - IO, JI] IAF Rey Sure, SK. /6F nicl Wfy. G@ Pre-/7F CLadk, a aot. 19s oe Go eb 17S Condle,, Uta l- /F C oanpr, Wackt C2 tor Leah Wik he - #6 C J - aay Ch nate nh, gorah b. 286 Sap OW. _—_*** coo ase t agunatice , Spr 97 Pe Raa yoy Cut etna sor, eo ae Carden, - 2 ae Chae, Frater Yaz o S26 eet thn Jas $ée| | - “Ulan - 36% Sip, 3246 — Cate, 6h Ww, - $97, Sle 2 PS) a4, 186, 294 ¥0G wale = - \ . ys] (| 3 a, f 5 —a" — ag p30 | HSS | 4 / LY9 7. ch Bla. &, thong SF Fis ne bi alt. $G0 , 580,64, 4583 c ea) ee pAoD GBS 497,492 Ca + Pasnevek Mon 449 Ca ple if S137 Clark oe 522 Combs | wr Spe — 574 bs £.... Z. i tL z a: i a é iz &% % i: SWE SE 14 3 A Bas i eres Doin. QU Te. okey ./ ie 0 IA Dowden, ices Rail Vili PA 7: _ 19%, 196, B95 | aoeeante ISO ” | _ JP/ ae, 14, 4F6 | Paufecr , Aen ‘ em Fb6, 360 | ide, pillanc f/194, Sos poe, so? | Bara, C. J. -24w flal debe Kanmerly - #6 / Bitha: Plywted Ctripinny AIS igo Bik — 299, 32/ | | —S B07 Dit, m4. Or 305 Cinna, Slam EB -I36 Pama, Ruth GB. 3S? | Poe Spb ——, oxo ISY, $72; 524, 3He Dube, rey eh “ ds aaa 2 £23 Qiks - a. - #44~ Ballina, 1), Mabme) Yoknaen) 43% Puckeo + fpalb i ew or Vain, fru , Gr — ThA, 563 Ela Net! f Dok, _ 774 ‘Edud Pim B- ¥/ | Eten, CQ W- 182, | s 4 pad, Porn. |? 6| ‘ mere, Bruny acharde - 294, 407 th, S14 a | Laka), Lard ig | gre dcegen on bn Se gtd 1 ae a - I . we ners = oo nent se " 3 — 3 — - se _ — — oe eee ra — ee ics Edun. S/ cae Bl- SB 137, 46, M7 Peapsamteny Teor 22-1135) 12 OAM 4 Oe, Hig ree 4 , en y: Bj hing. - $0.5 4 NM - ptidey tanger wae Jo. Ss , Voy = 12x, 40, 148, 3384, $37 Secmlo, rn, j3as — Jol, Rady bh €- 1357 F ames &. 167, BIS MG — tt 26 (hee : cr HY, -~£#FF Prank, sfamneek yy etek 475 f, ‘he. IF tsdee, A. A-s£70 ra Ld. II? PRONT | iS bok A BOOB 2 1. Bote ee eee Apu ited Oy eR. bras | Sie 9: DB. - 26125-1846 AM Heb 0° | dred. Gor Rage yen SA Tere. Tye Mn; Ye. #8 podber, lamin t OY jai ill 299, asc Soe’ yee ~~. Onin - 126, / 46 Sr ty Toy lah jin y ee Pe Cowan, fils te. — LF | iheoe’ turk. 18%, 173 | rtd fury (figer? Tirwrg (B- /92- Dordsen, jase Why 477, Jot Dablidunr, Cute tL 205 Lb j OS ie” il Db, Uroian Lp. 228 i L 7 rfy . ASe bn ef. /4| hand pur Ragords Ted Tarwrs 298 U pum, Wilkie Lue - Joo ~ - 6p. — bad — 7), “a? Ne 2 Woe O we ~-¢% Permian, 270, Rutt O47] Pend. i AfgpeX 7epery jh Lever, S3- SR 52s Bansn bMats pr Ae SI/ Shaan, we C a Te, a°ag | “ -— - _ “ - ¢ Hach Aeerg R- 32 sagierer, C- ~ 33,1257 He BK 27, 14°, (76 a - Jah J27 J 32 Fa wD - pO, ITT tatedled, dpe 2-182 151 A . re 184, S72 oruer, Worwant - 1% | ao CLY-dk His, 14, HOO ser. wr, OU zee 193, 303 4/38 Norge 143 thom ae A lang 9S? | Read \- oo “dé La. f Fle t hoe. aby wel mow WM, re gy) - 497 a We - Bay 2 entre, Borrire( CAs) S44, #7, gow 323 a Kpeh WwW. B¥7, 348 idup 98. = Bob Hubbard, Willer» fiam -Ibf, 569 H mek, ee FO? WlLard, “hh. hy Hit, Nill Elle #29 Wael gilt —_ 677? —~ 43/+¥34 at write Mlteap ted EEE Jane Fn _ G/?, saw Mernlacngts», Sats S/a Werrlacnme >, wpa - J . S/O — ee ae i Wax ez ¢ ote a po R os S oY 97 F | ere 9 — os cs, “tow | Moby 6 Tow te 9g? ae bly , Docthan Lralbecd - Us 12%, FSS yoe, £33 “ haste, lowes C-/9F 47s | te ‘sna Le ® - CL ame, N.C. ISL q ro 0. R SBSS Her (ow C.. Soe . . “ ra ; Qpack . WIS, S07 s k. Me. - #33 a a jak chad Duy - ¢-¥3 F | Poiner, CL not Wat? - ic aa - prev, Geka Wena - 45¥ ote Yeobicen/ NW}. —= - ¥IH, 53 3 fe my Mote Vy CrLy- “e3 _ thnder md ie Lrre Ae oo i" | -~ Di pee CGlL-~ G/2, S72 | _ \ Cndentcnty —_ arene S/G | | Titles b arnt. ~ 4/6 | od aati, bivckarde Dey - £53 |. a Opr da Write see 556 i ' ‘ 4 | ! ; d 7 | 4 ee — bo! A.M GC- ®arp- A¥7 ae “4 z = Linn $9, 527 ‘ 4 Ye, lle "’ ee 519 LIP x amlrick oy J) —- 65° a Dini, 2 FE \ ee EE EE 2 1 " | : 4 i be | | a ye ; 1} 1) ie ie ——— dehy, — Aili, ferrarR Yo 27. | Lille Buc aliac Mar.kLeeyl. oo | 2g 11877 &S7 Al”, Hee, swPr Catala, Sy oT 1) B fa, muse, 126, (86,505 furn, Tr , 46 127 Lees -_y-{0 oe nef et dacken, yall Mae - G22 Ww. L Pun, - $3! —— tortetiy L - 3 44, yo | wy Lh (bid) - Bf, 407,44 373 wl Ker Wired, S69, $70 oy, Charvee f— FIZ ~+#e4 -~- +e Vale Sine MOmere) — FR = Fes - +67 lamba, Thad (tut) B03 cys! = Gray l] , 522 a rire V4, hI, 542 — ¢2/ eal N70 -47# Aimy, Gek ne . sha ab 499 Yale Allg ts, Kn et AGS Member, teford Jacky. £2, sve S20 Dhak Aileen Carlee -572, ty Fameon, Games V7 - SL, v3 4 , MOE Wier0ee — 9/6 C _ S49 cces, Mle C ot 33 | gilty, £.4, - B29, 3460 7*83,/53 p7ithkyr, 9.4. 3350, 357 FJ - 93% 1335 eye, (.8. 3g/ a fi i IF Bl Sire, Wallac. Srngrok- Sry, 41), 45) IAW, jeog—- { 22 hay ar I? ti Plohir, Saa — 3c/ i (o, 22. weed Binh b 26/ 1 2s7 126 TILL actors Vn gertirne — 56% i m , hey bhar M- 2250-373, IF7, 1957/46, 19S i mM , bb tice — 3/ DD Or pa i Ri es /? Muedouts, Henbliw P~ He Dyerivem, Sovese/- 440 44/ Herren, 5 eke B - 47 pala? Vee 4 Thy her) ¥H/ - ¥AB Maddy a CX, a3, 737 ih Dprreson4 fahans/ A. ~ f #5 - ¥¥6 ! i H. Yk & x —- o-<») Bs 2, Jt - ©, /es— . W)eornr, 4. ww, - #7 a... Cnmnaane;, Tha TS, Wy atled, Jame Bh. - 454, 64/ ) lly, Qise S- 7, 08. $78 Wythe, XL. - 63,54 | Morras , J.C e — Geka) Kogud- fas z Morrah Ye magn teliinnsD- IZ? : . a Morte seas 144 Mu ail ye? haw - POF. Wie Mth, ~ — 126, 191 wpekoz SLE, - #83 why i Wren, Oocar jab, 13a, 193. 27, Githe J vip. 466, +¥? : Mere, ) a a G+} 34— WLasLews ' RHeeg A AY ape are as Moora — Mtl, fr-- 1 $C Patera € KHantler'a Uee_ (SAS 1 ¢ “ Lic takK , *aetsth- 973,52 / Wildl, 0.4. (SF m9 02. < , 0.3. a*eoL /76 Perro 2 Welbin £- O52 iy C Miiatog han & - 1&6 A )tte4s, C. F- Sb nlc Cp hrrmeion * -/87, Aveé397 Muller, CKartn 2-8 pt arte, 7 hence ) haan S56 J Mtr, Elian yaa Ia3 fas, ae - A28F, 344, -_ i? MW AHS Axl VES MM rose | et ae Co- As x won, A. 294, vor pac fi doce 296,199, £0? Qurrente-, Jo 2~ a Maral, 34/ Monae, _ B2/ Marshal, Gokut— 326 May, x ater CL 79/7 ee heen pete lahat a + a a! nana ‘ Aid, BA. 22s Ja ; “Nibnud, 1) B. 4 » 8 Hun, Seiaian oe 3 Wsleewplerer eile Gen 21, Oe feed, lara’ 27. 126 Mae hte. - S27 Mi thle , Vhilew ghmcZ- 77 is Mhhliadk #erburr P- Sop (hace, wr A - 3/3 Bi foie i tela UM 6c 523 - 4b63 —_. hae 2 np IF SAR MClileondd, Koto l/ Bagi, Bt, sll, 1s Miled ; a mE] —— ~ rine a so SS a ee sister en an Ps Weg ay + | 4 | oe Momer amg 4 72, ) 26, 166 AM Hob. sex a — A | Nesta, HN, A HG it | Anta, wm /2G, peur t Hi EO 1 ich! Yrs 77): in ge DD Mpada, I10tt 8. Joe a GO. 3/2 “ | hes Lr fiitir Wadley 35% he Loew B- 347 b BYihUn, fenua £0 - 411 7[ breac ee ean! Sugginle - 474 Boia : ee 2a eRe. 75 ee Seer? nae a es : { ss | | | “a | M | 4 | : i, | 5 ao «sw | ; — | Z = ‘ ; ji Na, } ; ‘ , n ; +4 ’ ft — a — 4 —_ ~ “ yor | Mache B- 37 Bhan tl, Hoek GF - AYS Guam, Sheed’ frase - Go a EEE TE A ae ia — wey abies | 26, — Corsa, Willan - 26 oa may Bam, — 440 , ~§ $22.63. $% 23 Auon- - CX a. > i. cm AE, 4S Rows NAb Jay, VB a4. 184, Al4, Hes so7 o 1a7, | 32 , OF - 193,)33— Viacachs, Clean’ & tpt 4 pe C.Sdne ISD a tit of - 18s, 13, £¥ a 4 Ren - /& 7, 187, Bods, F3§ ~ KH -4T¥ “A Plan x Renesid. 190 - F tonrth, ames -/¢P Pearson, Ricken R -2/g ora, Maayod pie oa W- PR, 159 Pode dace) 0.0. hee. 7 Aaa polar aw L, theo? £9 SAAhon., BS. 330 Gite CLewhe see - I#Z Hb], Se% Gin Ela R. sr FL mtr eb aint ~ J oe Aangeae —— Dak ae Park fan .., rhe. U 4D c Z Alin te. A Cased. walle AT ben / Wityran Waris - 5/7 7" / 7), t - 53H fA be. aie / 2, S22 = 2 = ae = “" a fe a ge | cs» - Z = 3 os Sd ER = = eS" ia SS a ’ Se ee ae rae ee My ey ene. is ey . a ie Gackhe _ Z, 10, 17,97 Romaux, Alay o 267 124,194, 998, Heo sH/ Kadrmarn, aie, 2G. 9 25s Raman Qamtte F- FF Raced | ye « Fae fuss, Homey F BNF- x4 (Rash, Trees , b~e Na Rikwxh, >- Pr - 1149 Randlennan, bt PMY - LPie , /9o Kori yore bye - sa8 Tt i hineor, Re Raa Fork - 1¥0, 193, 355 4 Hvcgee, Narled ‘iA =- JOS (Z eilin - W/7 ji es yr 64, B4L lip ang SHY, Wl rend 99 a Mok fae y/W, 222 Kaw: oH, hha dD Ey. - #37 ha thAg ep Og ha |. shed Rhinaw, Chreake » SII Rendlesrmay, Ctques _£7e Wiss Chad iter: Cutt lean ielltcde, hulle. 0-47 em fern oe 7 Ne ghee | GhiLineLh— G77 Shaper, > 2, - 34#/ @ Caumdire, —— ef 24 ,/35 ) (84, aj3, yest tos 9 darth, y) 2 Harvey - 25712», IST LIT, HO, soo ¢. , Matin 27 Licllerd. whe Smite, vail ie ae a Mle Seer, Zz F i bills, Phe Herne $3 1257 193 dy 4 ames = 27 Heron, .pt. 379, 393 a is ' Kreck Gs. o7 Miakmsn pi? - 3vo a BS Simons G ony UH pletincLe rof/y Ge HW J, 4). W. wiartaen - £536 , ss ii ase, filha Gant - &7 Lyre ; MR elilie gome- - ¥O%, Plo, sds y if etl, Yasar £- 71 Drthes, Rowud Meme, 408 so 9 | pwr Fi Co - 17% ofouthenr, Rerethe yes. - 407 a ? a umes,” | bw f— o...daas t | Bs“ th; Ore —— ws Of, ell, 4/o | i Pirgen Ct | yr . JAC 2%, 4 ==. Hhotorahey ahey Wo AIS, so? Wp b lhomehin, Gabpk 7-127, 139, 199, 22) Aeadle, Krrrad. 4/3 i qasemareran, bhddarckh- (28/39, 195,25, 33h Pyle, 7 Wrth. - 129/36, /32 . ftom /CT = Bp, 199 donll, Plunw — ule | i Ps ~ #94, 198, AIb, 299 | Jlmise, Yircan Mp - YF wlwut, Gaol u)- 6,578 | Purinesen , yriarshkalh - ee es Mhowe, 77 /Aty - #22, S¢o, SIZ ' F et ca . of C ; peeks, We €ceé GJ <s> vit clei | a bi ain, oo YA Zg Es M Dimmnersy Reheark F- 167 O dati, » b. 439 LG Poth, Gt B. [10,2399 forth, Gok Chane! - H4, 59% 7" PD ummers, Yast o / $7 A foretiu®, a. 2. ou - SY, SF 2. . 7 ; gS - SY A fymtin, Chy be 0.19% 297 Aloe, Kathe) ?. - 463 Smill, Prk Jer. 202,499 Alferd, KrsaKu'! WG . PTarmess a A. 207 bhape, (pancta)- yd . Shean, Olah i ee A burt, X45. - 799-00 ! Poke bic , pr Bir BKhuvte), ye Keh - +6 $993" 4 | ikea, Satine C. A/F Ahiied, Kasry Baborne). 40h 37|% f . Pasmanire, Toclil fe wll - 229 9af- 290, F324, 235 , | LT lovclee Stet fh. Ay, ava, 560 " ren tin Plow, Yj Ly |. 258 — Ti : A OS SUR ip) Ktomsere re, Cane a x tf \ | | Yat ) - Asye ‘ y/ Looe, A eelldcippeutillecn A> S57 | 7 Cheramte : dy ae farptre, PO A te 74, Y 76 } } | = Peptic Mega ~ GZ ‘ iat as my Wie bi caxiasitlipnannceane ante a " . Dieta + | Bpale aut hle/ i. su Cn dtlhesd, - AIF Aobowr!, 4p ack_ 500 | phen i Oa Se ee oS auremntee - 506 Skelloe, lela en OE sora ge., KR rher€ A. S10: SIL Marge , C/ due Gat - S// ‘ LH Jug. me 4/7 Hafod, Bie. WF EL MO. ¥20 See yl Game _ $2/ Ny Vener eal wd $2/ Yibluch, "Tied #2%- phartl hikwe $23 batlnge) $i J_s27 Pro there / Opplianese) thee - 559, S60 Aloop, thryrte. 74 Wome Apel « tthe. Cy.-IS4, 560 Alor, H.W. - 562 562 a,b, due Cu. i x19 Aever, bk 29/ | tapoms N- 19. a rena ora ee rex’ Tb, 70. EX EF, BFR, 390 gF1 Ti _, we - jas5 /F7, "9 NS ne t+ ) 34 199 ee fuoge_ 71 Nerv, 1S - 192- KS fd Waitin 6. [$0 alll, Dates MQ. 140, 3935" paws Wt A. ao7 1 , phrha J 536, S42 t THe 56 nem Ge - SEY fa bath, #16 |) 5. - F-¥8- F749 ia geome - ASS, HEE tamil a 3, £57 rhe WR S/¥ Ted, hinted = 3/7 Themgams OF oe ‘OD | piled ptehe Bhaiiisa sie 2 MEMS, For en aay NGy Crp. - 77. | | owe Aiflemens Outlet 6-596 | ie ——— dtr, Ctl Whe WC) 1S Weeds Tire - 26, 124) 4396, 293, 294, $53 pik, pe Wbpel Bar - 26- 2712875 /%6 wht, Luther Sranhbne - 8/3 Wlhiaweobn, orper* Gyvun tod ek Yas 2 Q.—-s6/ Weir» , he C2 UM aniz. G2 Wath, Tn +. a207 a. cil ote iin es 7° tite Code 4 ~_ SEX Vallee pew <saneen 3A fe Ze bell, i ce) Jae, 17.3 = 9 Yaz (IS ae ae (69 >a Drain, - 1837 Dard ae C~ 14S~ Wat, f. D, (87, 2% 355; ob, oe7 stabi » faumen Ysrry- /FO y Adal H. 193 W ibaow Gauk 7. 197, 336 A i P03 Wiebe cane Gan I/F Viben, T, a al diese derite Hater 24 Wilhey, md. - a1? whic, Sno I. FH ~ Frbenthe, AV, B41 [Mite DY. ~277 Woertt, pee > ae 3/6 wWathy, sock R - 357 Vike Clyde Me pp, PIS = , =H S22 lla on. - $2 Metheryee , Whe bark S. 435 — OA, Lee. gh grt syr When) Eli 0 -~ +39 -¥89 Wikhkam .), W.E. -¥S¢% -FO) Weak, Lb: ) Kocest 6.0, Ki ¢,,Lb. eA ae a py - 464 wala, prt Rik - 4, ig a dee " | an a | wd, eben 137 1G 7, 19), 22%, 3 2/, syom pi le I Occ ht Baia sod — a } a See enEEni ae We) , »” \}r Z ne je. 4, _ Ba } a = Se - Snes ee en ie — ¥ “ ~ i aa = ae —— _ = — a ee — a ae ——— os ~— Nee ee eananeneep ae Pe ee ER c ——— al . nS PS x ee se al eee 3 PI -_ - r en = 4 ee 7 oe >! s o 4 . : — rr 2k ai . ae “ a oes ? “7 “ 4 . as g “4 oN = eee 5 Ki. «= 2 - ee a es —— ee al es flo. 5193 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Precision Paint Corporation Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT W. D. Fox, also known as hack fox, Trading ad W. U. Fox Paint Company Defendant THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to tue court that a verified complaint was filed and Summons issued in this action on the 6th day of December, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the aefendant on the 7th day of December, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Une Thousand One Hundred Fifteen & 84/10) ($1115.84) Dollars with interest thereon from the 16th day of May, 1951; N a Ow, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum or $115.84, with interest thereon from the lé6th ‘MM day of May, 1951, and the costs of this action, This 12th day of January, 1952, rps Sp Smith Vlerk Superior Court a a ¢ tet iete e 19 i , i My Oo 5194 bY se Carolina, | In the Superior Court, | : Iredell County. Before the Clerk, | i g, Myers, Trading as ; * Myers Tire Service, | ‘ vs " JUDGMENT | > 4,Mott Brawley, a * Defendant. i 4 i 4 This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior i i Court of Iredell County on this the llth day of January, 1952, on motion of Scott Ht and Collier, Attorneys, for judgment by default final; ti And it appearing to the Court that the action was instituted in this Court a on December 7th, 1951, to recover upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise . sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant; i And it further appearing to the Vourt that in the action based on the account, there is due on said account the sum ot Three Hundred Twenty-One and 81/100 Dollars ($321.81), with interest at 6% from December 6th, 1951, until paid; that Complaint fi was served on the defendant on December 10th, 1951, but that defendant has failed | to answer or otherwise plead in the cause, and it further appearing to the Court Re DR ae M5 Si a that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against the defendant; : It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, J. Mott Brawley, the sum of $321.81, with interest from December siicdsae ei ab Geicenie o 6th, 1951, at the rate of 6% until paid together with the costs o: this action. C, G, Smith Clerk Superior Court ewe we eK Kw Hh KK KK HK KK NO. 5188 North Carolina | In theSuperior Court, Iredell County | Before the Clerk. J. H. Thompson and W, L. Neely, Jr., i ite ia ANe eb ke len EE i ae irading as Statesville Insulation mpany, Plaintiffs, ve JUDGMENT . L, Sparks, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell County on this the llth day of January, 1952, on motion of Scott and Collier, Attorneys, for judgment by default final; And it appearing to the Court that the action was instituted in this Court on December lst, 1951, to recover upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise Sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant; fio. 5193 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Precision Paint Vorporation Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT W. D. Fox, also known as Mack rox, Trading ad W. DU. Fox Paint Company elle Defendant THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, UVlerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to tue court that a verified complaint was filed and Summons issued in this action on the 6th day of December, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the aefendant on the 7th day of December, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Une Thousand Une Hundred Fifteen & 84/10. ($1115.84) Dollars with interest thereon from the 16th day of May, 1951; N in a ow, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of 9115.84, with interest the f h a oe one ae a8 May, 1951, and the costs of this action. This 12th day of January, 1952. “tert sue vie “Superior Court * ee me & ree OSS 8O00 6 8880 4 bk us ake ela oe 3 4 # ‘ _ x lle 2 ai oe eine sic Rant et halite teat cr it see SOR Ss bia ser EN 19 io. 519k North Carolina, | Iredell County. In the Superior Court Before the Clerk, : E, Myers, Trading as 3 Tire Service Myers "Plaintiff, vs " JUDGMENT J, Mott Brawley, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on this the llth day of January, 1952, on motion of Scott and Collier, Attorneys, for judgment by default final; And it appearing to the Court that the action was instituted in this Court on December 7th, 1951, to recover upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant; And it further appearing to the Court that in the action based on the account there is due on said account the sum of Three Hundred Twenty-One and 81/100 Dollars ($321.81), with interest at 6% from December 6th, 1951, until paid; that Complaint was served on the defendant on December 10th, 1951, but that defendant has failed to answer or otherwise plead in the cause, and it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against the defendant; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, J. Mott Brawley, the sum of $321.81, with interest from December 6th, 1951, at the rate of 6% until paid together with the costs oi this action. C. G, Smith Clerk Superior Court me mR we ew Ke me KK KK KK x NO. 5188 North Carolina | Iredell County | In theSuperior Court, Before the Clerk. J. H. Thompson and W. L. Neely, Jr., jrading as Statesville Insulation pany, Plaintiffs, vw JUDGMENT + L, Sparks, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the “Uperior Court of Iredell County on this the llth day of January, 1952, on “otion of Scott and Collier, Attorneys, for judgment by default final; And it appearing to the Court that the action was instituted in this Court on December lst, 1951, to recover upon an account for goods, wares and merchandise Sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant; , 2. eee ieee Ses 2 And it further appearing to the Court that in the action based on the account, there is due on said account the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-Five ang 20/109 Dollars ($265.20), with interest at 6% from October 18, 1949, until paid; that Complaint was served on the defendant on December 3, 1951, but that the defendant has failed to answer or otherwise plead in the cause, and it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final againgt a the defendant; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, S. L. Sparks, the sum of $265.20 with interest from October 18, 1949, at the rate ot 6 until paid, together with the costs of this action, CG. G, Smith Glerk Superior Court x oe eR NR9aSSRhHLEREEKk ESR KKK HK K Ao. 5203 North Carolina. In the Su " perior Court Iredell County. Before the Clerk. F Auto Parts and Electric Company, | Plaintiff, | vs I JUDGMENT Martha Minton and Richard Minton, | Vefendants, X T g his cause coming on to be neard, and being heard before the Honorable Uv. G, . uv i F aa ; ’ . smith, vlerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the court from the Statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff nas gected to take a nonsuit in its action; It is - » therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and é be tax ed with the costs ot' the action to be charged by the Ulék. This the 10th day or January, 1952, LU, G. Smith | Clerk Superior Court Mi Consented to: SCOTT & COLLIER By M. Nash Attorneys for the Plaintiff Kem & : "SPCC SSO 6s een oe. * MK x ial inl 21 JNO. 5195 North Carolina. | } Before the Clerk, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. &, Myers, Trading as Myers Tire Service, Plaintiff, vs JUDGMENT ld W. J. Kiker, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Vlerk of the Qa etre teen, - Superior Court of Iredell County on this the 14th day of January, 1952, on motion of Scott and Collier, Attorneys, for judgment by default final; And it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted in this Court on December 7th, 1951, to recover upon an account for goods, wares am merchandise sold and delivered by tlhe plaintiff to the defendant; And it further appearing to the Court that in the action based on the account, there is due the sum of Three Hundred SeventyeEight and 49/100 Dollars ($378.49) with interest at 6% from Vecember 6th, 1951, until paid; that Complaint was served on the defendant on Vec. 12th, 1951, but that the defendant has failed to answer or otherwise plead in the cause, and it further appearing to the Vourt that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against the defendant; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, W. J. Kiker, the sum of $378.49, with interest thereon from December 6th, 1951, until paid, at the rate of 6% together with the costs of this action, UG. G. Smith Clerk Superior Vourt Kee ek Ke we we me we ee KK KR RK 4 23 | Alo. 5064 i NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 40. 4770 i ‘URE THE CLEF a CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ' IREDSLL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK 8 NORTH CA : | - DELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK i { j IREDE il it John W, Massey iM | F on | JUDGMENT Ls ¢c, C. Johnston & W. C. Johnston, Jr | \ " |) “YA Neel's Grocery Store ani] i A. L. Norris | & i( : 7 o rT 7 vs Fig |: 2 a | JUDGMENT it ; i d being heard before the Honorable a ; ; Bul | This cause coming on to be heard, an gZ M4 indie Gillespie a waht Seem i M4 CG. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it a T/A Gillespie & brown | i ; a i if appearing to the court from the statement of the attorneys for theplaintiff that ; it 4 q ey ; : ; , ‘ : " Ria iY the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and ; This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable i i} % . \ rv . : i i + that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; ' C, G, Smith, Ulerk of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Uarolina, and it ‘it ' 4 wh t It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be j appearing to the Court from the Statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff Mi i nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk, i that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties t i This 17th day of January, 1952. and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; iH i It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be i | C. G, Smith Ai |, Ulerk Superior Court 4 nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the clerk, te This 18th day of January, 1952. . | C. G. Smith ik ie Clerk Superior Court 4 WO. 5039 | | NORTH CAROLINA : : + 3 Ps 5 * a Re ao a a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ; oi ee RRR RK KK KK KK KK i IREJELL vOUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK 7 yo James E. Meacham T/A i Meacham & Watts Mason 0 Hh tS Masonry Co, vs JUDGMENT Edward Oliver and wife, Eloise Oliver | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable 9 ’ an Ve Se Smith, Clerk of superior Court, Iredell vounty, North Varolina, and it 4 oo) ee " * a y > appearing to the court from the Statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff that the matters and thing ° 4n controversy have been settled between the arties and t! aintiff p nat the plaintiff nas elected to take a nonsuit in its action; if it is there j , efore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintifi be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to | be charged by the Clerk, This 17th day of January, 1952, CO, G. Smith Clerk Superior Court. =F. 23 = _— a > ja sronnjpentagsnolpanenprieer esas eee A 4 = —- Ecupehasioomsaemnand Se ak 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, January 28th, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 2&th day of January, 1952, at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. when and wnere His Honor, J. H, Clement, Judge Presiding and Holding vourts oi the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, 1952, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial Vistrict of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J. \&. kumple, High Sheriff o Iredell County, is present and opened vourt by order of the Court. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff oi Iredell vounty, returns into open Vourt the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for the January Term, 195Q, First Week, to-wit: and for a Grand Jury to serve for a six months period ending June 30th, 1952, to-wit: T L Edmiston Lewis Alexander H D Howard J C Crawford R P Craven Charles W Washington Mrs. Florence Brown Robley Stevenson B L Gatton E R London T c Delk Ub Jolley W C Carrigan C H Knox J C Nabors frank Adams R M Linker J L Lackey P G Overcash WG Morris, Sr. gy & Summers C H Goodwin, Jr. W B Goodman Walter E Miller Mrs P B Hedrick Mrs R L Alley F M Goodnight C J Hendren Mrs Herman Brown WR Tilley TH Davis, dr. H B Hunter J F Ketchie Mrs Sadie May Hickman Walter S Chambers C S Sharpe Tom M Stafford Jack T Roach L R Conger Willie F Shumaker L W Livingston Miss Plato Kelly Glenn P Fox, Jr. Harry L Moore N C Caskey Lewis R Stikeleather vurlee Bailey F F Shaver The following good and lawful men and women were duly drawn and sworn as the Grand Jury to serve for t J C Crawford UC J Hendren CH Goodwin, Jr Walter E Miller T © Delk Glenn P Fox, Jr Lewis R Stikeleather J F Ketchie Lewis Alexander W G Morris, Sr ’ TH Davis, Jr W B Goodman T M Stafford yr WS Carrigan Mrs Herman Brown J C Nabors Mrs R L Alley R M Linker he six months period ending June 30th, 1952, tonwit et eae RIE RS 20 IN—THE—SUPERIOR—COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, January 28th, 1952 C C Clark was allowed by the Judge to substitute for C$ Sharpe. T L Edmiston was not served. Charles W Washington, Mrs. Sadie May Hickman, Jack T Roach, Mrs. Florence Brown and Willie F Shumaker were excused by the Court, Miss Plato Kelly was excused by the VUlerk, P G Overcash was not returned. F F Shaver was deceased. The following were sworn as talesman jurors for the Week. MC Smith Clarence Redmond P S Vonnolly ae J P Patterson L F Warren Boyd Sprinkle R R Mayberry 40, 1103 | FALSE PRETENSE State | Alias Capias vs j Guy Ramsey { No. 1345 | POSSESS LIQUOR State Alias Capias vs Mary Saunders | No, 1354 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State : Continued under former order, vs Benjamin Jackson Threatte, Jr 7 1387 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON | Continued under former order. Johnnie Moten | No, oe | LARCENY ae i Alias Capie “a as Capies Toby Hyde | %. 1549 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ate i Alias Capias vs | i William Leroy Smith No. 1558 State vs lottie Bell Cloud LARCENY Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and capias. flo. 1 hex’ | ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT vs | Continued under former order. George § Creson a0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Joseph Fulton Woods IN THE SUPERIOR COURT " FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 My Monday, January 28th, 1952 Monday, January 28th, 1952 H MI a Wo. 1604 | DRIVING DRUNK ; ‘| WW State | Alias Capias ‘ Woe 1643 = pei 4 op ip Rigas Hl i i i 2 State ! Continued for the tem, Hil Mh an ! 1 1 vs Luther Franklin White ft P| | a { dad No. 1605 ABAND = ro State ' jexinad Gale forani order. do, 1602 | DRIVING DRUNK P| Hi _ i a State | —— through his attorney, J. G. Lewis, hig _ G A Benfield vs enters a plea of Not Guilty. B m { Oscar Leon Albea i Jury sworn and empanelled,. tH H \ 4 We3h, | After hearing the evidence, the Court directed ay i No. 1606 1 DRIVING DRUM 1 {| a verdict of Not-Guilty. i > \ — | Alias Capias 4 fi I Joseph Fulton Woods No, 1586 | POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR it ‘ State | Defendant through her attorney, John R McLaughlin, ie) { \ Kg vs {| enters a plea of Not-Guilty. at 7 ma | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY a Hattie Simpson I Jury sworn and empanelled, ni ; ate \ Continued under former order. 8 C=-32 | After hearing the evidence, the Court directed thie 4 i] af i 4 | a verdict of Not-Guilty. if Bidful Privette i | it ‘ jae State | ASSAULT WITH DeAaDLY WEAPON a State | The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body ie iI vs Cont inued 4 vs | (ighteen present) a True Bill of Indictment charging ii JD Gray i 9 Alexander Hughey Montgomery 1 the defendant , Alexander Hughey Montgomery with tH HY ie the capital offense of Murder in words and figures ie ‘i. 3 as follows: | ! ‘No. 1633 eq » _— a State | reer Panes i "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT f | ontinued under former order. IREVELL CUUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1952 Homer A Nantz THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: That Alexander Hughey Montgomery late of the County of Iredell, on the l6th day of January, A. D. 1952, with Dede os se | } did kill and murder one Richard Lawrence contrary to the form of the statute in such ease made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. Merriman Keller - ; Wo, 1573 *y PT r = ie State =ere ita PE force and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, ‘ | vontinued for the term for defendant, wilfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforethought, i i vs , ; \Nos. 1641 & 1642 Zeb_A. Morris SEE TRAS ee E William Parsons and Instanter Capias. ate | DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY ve vontinued for the State, Solicitor. Weldon Campbell \ Willard Chambers [ "No. 1665 Be STATE i; aNo. 1649 — - vs _— I "cee DEADLY WEAPON | Alexander Hughey Montgomery : | ant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sed Fa INDICTMENT INo. 1650 MURDER State BIGAMY vs Continued for ° or Term, Witness | Hobert Redman J. C. Rumple x mt as 20 Sam Laws X — | SMBEZZLENENT Dr. J. 3B. Henninger ; vs Contin Ben Wilhelm | ued for the Term, Those marked x sworn by the undersigned | foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and N this bill found A TRUE BILL. No. 1557 State POSSESS TAX pat Walter E, Miller vs ‘iD LIQUOR IN BLDG NOT USED AS DWELLING Foreman of the Grand Jury. Defendant thr ° &@ plea of Not Gadit Jury sworn and e h his attorney, J. G. Lewis, enters :. Wo, l6y8 mpanelled, _ ae or Lackey ASSAULT ON OFFICER a meee wee eee eee ee ’ dient seed ered by the court that the case be vs | Defendant through his attorney, J G Lewis, enters . . Ernest 4) | a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and Empanelled. — ee | At the close of State's evidence, defendant enters | 4 plea of guilty ofassault on officer. ee ee WNos. 1651 No. 1595 State vs Marvin Ladd We INo. 1655 State vs Leonard J Lunau No. 1655 State vs Leonard J Lunau W-26 1652, 1653 & 165, State vs Gene Frank Hayes W=21 "Nos. 1651, 1652, 1653 & 165, State vs Gene Frank Hayes Wos. 1669 & 1670 State vs Marvin C Blackwelder FIRS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT T WEEK == JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, January 28th, 1952 ASSAULT ON FEMALE It appearing to the Court that at the November Term, 1951, of the Superior court of Iredell] County the defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere to’ an assault on a female. Judgment of the Court was that the defendant be confined in the common jai} of Iredell County for a period of TWO YHARS, ‘The road sentence was suspended provided the defendant supported his family and violated no laws of the State of N. C.; that he pay the cost of the action, It appearing to the Court that on January 16, 1952, the defendant was convicted in the Recorder's Court of Iredell County for wilfully failing to Support his family and was sentenced to the roads for a period of two years, It is ordered that commitment issue to the end that the defendant serve the TWO YEARS sentence imposed at the November Term, 1951, of the Superior Court, the Court finding that the defendant has violated the suspension otf said judgment, in that he has violated the laws of the State of N. C. for failing to support his wife and children and being sentenced to the roads, FORGERY A True Bill FORGERY Defendant enters plea of guilty of forgery. JUDGMENT of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for & period of SIX MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Vefendant enters plea In No. 1651, Judgment ot’ defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell vounty for not less than FOUR nor more than FIVE YEARS, assigned to work on the roads under the Supervision of the State Hichwa Pubic works Commission, ¥ ghway and Pub In No, 1652, Jud , lefendant be confined tn -~ common jail of Iredell on the ed > period of TWO YEARS, assigned to work Rtehiay and rHbHTE LOR SMESEAEESGS, OF HES SBtE ene is to run concurrent with the sentence in No. 1651. In No. 1651, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell vounty for a period of TWO YEARS, assigned to work rere roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is to run concurrent with the sentence in No. 1651. In No. 1653, Solicitor takes a Nol Pros With Leave. of Guilty as charged. the court is that the BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill EMBEZZLEMENT A True Bill It is orde defendant, red that a capias be issued for the No, 1660 State ee ea eee vs p W Byers No, 1657 State vs John Andrew Bratcher Ce2h ko, 1658 State vs James Buster Clark Gah2 No, 1659 State vs Will Holmes Ce2] No. 1656 State vs Ben Wilhelm ‘No. 1659 State vs Will Holmes Vos, 1657 & State 7 & 1658 vs vob Andrew Bratcher 8 Buster Clark Wo, 1662 State vs Stowe Henry Chapman IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --~ JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, January 28th, 1952 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT _ Defendant through his attorneys, J G Lewis and Eugene Trivette, enters a plea of flolo Contendere,. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO YLARS, and assigned to wak on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, Vapias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pays into the Clerk's office the sum of $30.00 per month for the benefit of his minor child, Crystal Byers, the first payment to be made on or before the first day of February, 1952, and a like sum of $30.00 on or before the first day of each succeeding month, including January, 1953. The Clerk is authorized to turn over to said minor Crystal Byers, who is now in high school. It ds further ordered that the defendant pay the cost of this action, BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters plea of guilty. The Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Central Prison at Raleigh for a term ot not less than LIGHT nor more than TEN YeARS, BREAKING, EWTERING & LARUEZNY Defendant enters a plea ol guilty. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Ventral Prison at Raleigh, for a term of not less than HIGHT nor more than TEN YEARS. STULEN RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY KNOWING SAME TO HAVE BEEN/ Defendant enters a plea of guilty. The judgment of the court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of FIVE YEARS and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, EMBEZZLEMENT A True ill RECEIVING STOLEN PRUPERTY A True Bill BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill MANSLAUGHTER A True Bill — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, January 28th, 1952 | MURDER a No. 1665 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, January 29th, 145 2 L State On this the 28th day of January, A. D, 1952 q This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, uh vs there comes into open Court, in the custody of F 7 ‘ A.M i Alexander Hughey Montgomery J. CG, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, | January 29th, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A, M, it C=29 North Carolina, whose prisoner he is, Alexander 5 Bo Hughey Montgomery in his own person, and the saig 4 i prisoner being at the bar of the Court, and lr, | fo, 1663 CARELESS & RECKLESS DRIVING } John R, McLaughlin having been appointed by the aie i ie Gaia: os tie, as his ‘adidas: ne Court as Attorney to represent the deféndant is : 8 I present in Court in behalf of the defendant, the sruce Meadows Bill of Indictment in this case was read to him, and forthwith it is demanded of him, the said { Alexander Hughey Montgomery, how he will acquit i ho, 1664 himself of the premises in said Bill of Indictment we FH specified and charged upon him, and the said — } Alexander Hughey Montgomery answering the Bill of Biward Ford } Indictment aforesaid, says he is NOT GUILTY of the a - felony and MURDER therein charged, and therefore, for good or evil, he puts himself upon his Country } and His God, and Hon. Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor A, for the State, in his behalf, doth the like. | ' j | No, 1661 State vs Bessie Fair . This Honorable Court takes recess until q 1 Tuesday Morning, January 2gth, 1952 at 9:30 O'clock, A, M, examined before the Those marked x sworn by i$ unde A TRUE BILL. eee remanded to Mooresville Recorder's Court for judgment. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney, Mr. John R, McLaughlin, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: E R London, J L Lackey, F M Goodnight, L R Conger, H D Howard, R P Craven, Robley Stevenson, Frank Adams, H B Hunter, C C Clark, Harry L Moore and B L Gatton, Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell Vounty for a term of FOUR MONTHS and assiged to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Capias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pays the cost of this action and pay a fine of $100.00; That he surrender his driver's license to the Clerk Superior Court to be sent to the Department of Motor Vehicles, Highway Safety Division, Raleigh, N, C.; and that he not operate a motor vehicle for a period of twelve months, MURDER The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body (eighteen present) a True Bill of Indictment charging the defendant, Bessie Fair, with the capital offense of Murder in words and figures as follows: "State of North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1952 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: That Bessie Fair late of the County of Iredell, on the 19th day of October, A. D., 1951, with force and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, wilfully, feloniously, and of her malice aforethought, did kill and murder one Polly Sherrill contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. Zeb A. Morris _ Solicitor. "No. 1661 STATE vs Bessie Fair INDICTMENT MURDER Witness H, &, Renegar R. C, Dyson X Dr. Wrenn Jannie Mae Campbell J»._M. Hobbs Ofiie Sherrill Margie Sherrill X rescued «GIT Pound eR 6a ts No. 1572 State vs Bud Little, alias Marshall Little No. 1647 State vs George A Hurst W=30 No, 1644 State vs Troy Fresperman “- ‘No. 1667 State vs Robert Vanderburg ‘No. 1667 State vs Robert Vanderburg C= 33 ‘No. 1638 State vs Julian Smith W- 32 mee ene IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK---JANUARY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, January 29th, 1952 BREAKING & ENTERING A True Bill ASSAULT Defendant through his attorney, John Lewis, enters a plea of Not Guilty to Assault With Intent to Kill, U dan ers pl f Guilty to assault inflicti Set Rt ened toe tnaukdape is that the defendant be ’ confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a Term of TWELVE MONTHS and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public «orks Commission, ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Defendant through his attorney, John R McLaughlin, enters a plea of Nolo Vontendere. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE MCNTHS and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public works commission, Capias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pay into the Clerk's office the sum af $25.00 on or before the first day of vebruary, 1952, and a like amount on or before the first Gay Ol each succeeding month until this order 1s modified and changed; said sums of money to be paid in for the benefit of his minor child, Patricia vesperman, and said sums to be turned over to tne mother of said child. It is further ordered that the defendant pay the cost of this action. BREAKING, SNTERING & LARCENY A True Bill BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY a an enaamt enters a plea of Not Guilty. ~, soem and empanelled as follows: J E Summers, on knoe. weet LW Livingston, Ne C, Caskey, 4 Jolity. : illey, Walter S Chambers, Curlee Bailey, Pr setureed meet » * warren and Clarence Redmond. oe i verdict of Guilty as charged. cesbean oe he Court is taat the defendant be period of TWO YEipq on, Jail of Iredell County for a under the “tS and assigned to work on the roads Supervision of the § Hj Public Works Commission, State Highway and Pub RSUKLESS DRIVING Vefendant throurh hi I & plea of Not Guilty, vent ae oy eden and empanelled as follows: J & Summers, WR Tilley ante “ Livingston, NC Caskey, C H Knox, C Selles’ ae 3 ne Curlee Bailey, 4 3 » M » L F Warren and C nce Redmonds ury returned a verdict of Guilty os cin reeds gment of the c in the comm ve vourt is that the defendant be confined ST) niyumon jail of Iredell ¢ , f SIXTY Days ; rede Vounty for eriod 0 supervision ot &ssigned to work on the roads under the Commission C the State Highway and Public Works Sentence int apias not to issue to put the road © effect provided the defendant pays the ot $50.00, and provided ays into the Clerk! ne benefit of Tillman Bean’ the sum of Jud further he $18.65 for £ Eieceun aol fo, 1668 State vs James F Ramsey Y). 24 No. 1636 State vs Brice P Kistler W=28 No. 1600 State vs Emmett George sisele No, 1628 State vs Clayton Hagans We2k, Nos. 1519 & 1520 State a] vs Will Mathis alias Will Luther "Luke Kimmer Ababea Nios. 1630 & 1631 otate vs Otho Herman Stutts No. 1661 otate vs Sessie Fair No, 1665 State vs Alexander Hug hey Mi Mathew IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, January 29th, 1952 ee ontgomery | SPEEDING Defendant through his attorney, Hugh G Mitchell, enters a plea of Guilty to speeding 50 miles per hour in 35 mile zone. Judgment of the Vourt is thatthe defendant pay the cost of this action, SPESDING Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment oi the Vourt is that the defendant pay the cost of this action, DRIVING DRUNK. Defendant through his attomeys, J G Lewis and R A Collier, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: E R London, J L Lackey, F \. Goodnight, L & Vonger, H D Howard, R P Craven, Robley Stevenson, Framk Adams, H B Hunter, R & Mayberry, Harry L Moore and B L Gatton. Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. LARCENY Defendant enters plea of Guilty trespassing. Judgment of the Court is that the uefendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell vounty for a term of SIX MONTHS and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public works Commission. : Capias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pays the cost of this to Forcible action and remains a law abiding citizen for a period ol two years. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LaRUeNY Continued to May Term, 1952 Superior vourt. SPEEDING: REUVKLZSS DRIVING Continued MANSLAUGHTER Continued for the term, MURDER Continued for the term for the defendant. SS eee iy Mi Af > — se ‘No. 1666 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, January 29th, 1952 No. 1662 {| MANSLAUGHTER vtate i Continued for the Term, vs i ! Stowe Henry Chapman | SPEEDING State ' Continued for the Tem, vs i ! James Wilford Cash Nos. 1645 & 1646 otate vs Lloyd H Hoover DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the Term. GRAND JURY REPORT etry The Grand Jury passed on all pills that were presented by the Sol icitor and found true bills in all cases, A Committee with T. C. Delk as Chairman, inspected the County Home establishment and found conditions to be Satisfactory, except a few minor things which we will list below as follows: Living “—" : aving quarters and the kitchen were found to be in good shape, and inmates were cared for, The comni in ine , ittee inspecting the vounty Home found a total of 15 white women, 15 white me dow ? ny 9 colored women, 2 colored men, 1 white prisoner and 1 colored priso- nere The G h . rand Jury found that one building heated by wood stove was found to be dangerous. And also more uelp is needed especially in preparing meals. The Committee found at so: e that some of the mattresses were in bad condition. The rooms looked ¢l wk i eroomy, would suggest some new drapes something in plactic, The superintendent is doing a good Job considering the Conditions of inmates, The outlying buildings were found to be in good conditi on, County Jail: jy a Ne found 26 male prisoners, 13 white and 13 colored prisoners well taken care o/' except as far as we provided by law. The jail ; ' is in good re unsightly an nk the still in the yard d that it Should be wrecked and Sal vaged and money turned over to thé ee OO Se eae ee ag os IN THE SUPERIOR COURT " FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Ph ia Tuesday, January 29th, 1952 na School Board as provided by law, Prison Camp: The committee of the Grand Jury visited the prison camp. We tH found that there were 93 prisoners at the present. All the buildings and grounds The prisoners are all well cared for, ae | yere well cared for. We wish to commend | | f those in charge of these County properties for the fine way in which they have been taken care of. A Committee with Mrs. Herman Brown, as Chairman, County vourthouse: inspected the Vourt House, generally the conditions are satisfactory with tne 8, ee ee arene a ee | | ay i! exceptions oi a few minor repairs and painting. Ht } th ee The Committee talked with the Clerk of Court, and found all records of ie a ty | : 3 my T : a \ u ri 4 i | Administrators, Executors, and Guardians to be in order. ‘fhe Justice of Peace 1 1 i} aa records were up to date. | Walter E. Miller a Walter E. Miller, foreman ih . ia Be v This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, February 4th, 1952 at 10:00 o'clock A. M, FO ne ees IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, January 29th, 1952 No. 1662 | MANSLAUGHTER vtate | Continued for the Term, vs Stowe Henry Chapman ‘No. 1666 | SPEEDING State | Continued for the Term, vs James Wilford Cash Nos. 1645 & 1646 {| DRIVING DRUNK State | Continued for the Term. vs | Lloyd H Hoover | GRAND JURY REPORT JANUARY 29th, 1952 The Grand Jury passed on all bills that were presented by the Solicitor and found true bills in all cases, A Committee with T, C. Delk as chairman, inspected the County Home establishment and found conditions to be Satisfactory, except a few minor things which we will list below as Tollows: Living j ¥ & quarters and the kitchen were found to be in good shape, and inmates were cared for, The commit it i es vee inspecting the vounty Home found a total of 15 white women, 15 white men co tw + 7 aon women, 2 colored men, 1 white prisoner and 1 colored priso- ner. The Grand Jury - " ; ound that one building heated by wood stove was found to be dangerous. And also more uelp is needed especially in preparing meals. The Committee found at so: . that some of the mattresses were in bad condition. The rooms looked glo li E4+oomy, would surrest Some new drapes Something in plactic The superintendent is doing a rood Job considering t he conditions of inmates, The ubl i 2 e . O unty “ il: prisoners » 13 white and 13 colored well taken car f’ € of except as far as we Can find out the prisoners are not being examined Sy doctors when they are locked up for over 48 hours as repair, unsightly and that it Should be wrecked and sal 8a provided by law, The jail is in good We think the still in the yard 48 vaged and money turned over to the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, January 29th, 1952 School Board as provided by law. Prison Camp: The committee of the Grand Jury visited the prison camp. We found that there were 93 prisoners at the present. All the buildings and grounds yere well cared for. The prisoners are all well cared for, We wish to commend those in charge of these County properties for the fine way in which they have been taken care of. County vourthouse: A Committee with hrs. Herman Brown, as vhairman, inspected the Court House, generally the conditions are satisfactory with tne exceptions oi a few minor repairs and painting. The Committee talked with the Clerk of Court, and found all records of Administrators, Executors, and Guardians to be in order. ‘he Justice of Peace records were up to date. Walter E, Miller _ Walter E. willer, foreman This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, February 4th, 1952 at 10:00 o'clock A. M neem t p é- =: SS a N or endagt agen ia = 4 x ee Se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --e-- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUP#RIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, February 4th, 1952, at 10:00 o'clock, witi Honorable J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding and Holding Vourts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District, opring Term, 1952, present and presiding. J. GC. Rumple, lligh sheriff of Iredell County returms into open vourt the na..es of the followins good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the Second Week of the January Term, 1952, Iredell Vounty Superior Lourt, to-wit: Thomas C. Harris VU. We Plyler Clarence White flake F. Murdock UC. B. Moore, Sr. We. O. Weston Robert L. Brawley Gaston *, Soners C Donaldson H. B. Sellers U. &, Wilson } >. Cline Marvin T,. Johnson George °, Vathey M. A. Black lon Re Crawford Arthur L, Smith Blackwelder Pe Nash J. Vonald Patter _ A. MeLelland L. McVoy Nathan T, Neely Wacner Was we P. Nash was excused by the Vourt,. a ; The followings men consti he 2 stitute what shall hereat'ter be termed the Vivorce Jury 41" to-wit: T be I 1 ii : nomas UV, Harri fla} ‘ leur’ 18, “lake «. lurcock, Robert L. Brawley, H. B. Sellers, Marvin T ne es ; S, irvin [T, J MUNSON, le i, vrawford, B. iia lie soy C j Plyler ’ ia }.oore, CY , e ile , Ve ~e ** Sr., Gaston F, Somers, D, i ils ’ e UMersS A i wll SOY ¢ Georece ‘ 9 Ye wn, and George L, vathey,. \No. 5171 Hobert Redmon DIVORVE The Vivorce Ju ' i _. ry #1" being duly sworn and vs empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Addie G Redmon NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERN, 1952, ° Hobert Redmon Vs. ISSUES Addie G,. Redmon 1. Uid the plaintiff an d defendant i and are they now husband and wife ntermarry, ’ a8 alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes ee 2. Did i ize Plaintiff and defendant Seperate, and have they lived continuously Seperate a nd aps ; part from each other for more than two years wae < IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: _ Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bontfide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months prior to the institution of this action, as alled in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY Thith, 1952 Hobart Redmon | vs I Addie G. Redmon t This cause coming on to be heard, é being heard at this term of Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, before His honor, J. H. Vlement, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury naving answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, set out in the record: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the vourt that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Hobart Redmon, and the defendant, Addie G. Redmon, be, and the same are hereby dissolved ani set aside, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from tne defendant, J. H, Vlenent Judge Presiding No. 5175 “race Johnson ULVORVE Ve an ; The Vivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled nnis B. Johnson | answers the issues submitted to it as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREVELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM Grace Johnson VS, j Yennis B, l, Johnson ! Yid the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, eg ee SRE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK #-- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State @ North Carolina, Iredel} County for more than six months preceding the filing of this complaint? c Answer. _Yes ° te Raa ne 3. Did the plaintiff separate from the defendant and nave they lived separate ang Be apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the complaint? Fs Answer. _Yes ° & NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDSLL COUNTY JANUARY TERM Grace Johnson { VS. | JUDGHINT Denais Jonson | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at the January tem, 1952 euperior Court of lredell County, before his Honor, J. H. Clemert, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in therrecord; and it appearing to tne vourt that three children were born of the marriage between the tntitft ana +} la PanAan?® OO ts Dies , ao . Z . plaintiff and the defendant, Namely: Loveada Johnson, age 17, James Johnson, age 16 and Charles Jotinson, age 14. T IS. th . — : ‘ IT IS, therefore, ordered, adjudged ana decreed that the bonds of matrimony . od v4 $ re oF " ha in spn ‘ a ; - heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissol and ( eintiPr ie harahe ‘ y Senne, tue plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. This the 4 day of Feb. 1952, J. H. Clement _dudge Presiding % J9 a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 No, 5181 Mack B. Overcash } DIVORCE ~ ve { The Divorce Jury j/1" being duly sworn and empanelled Gertrude A. Overcash | Answers the issues submitted to it as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mack B. Overcash | Mm Oo & G Ww -VS- | I Gertrude A. Uvercash | 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT January Term, 1952 Mack 8, Overcash | tiie } JUDGMENT Gertrude A. Overcash | This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, a8 appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of sarriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the sane are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. J. H. Vlement udge Presiding a a ee a mo x IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 ‘| 1 ‘No. 5186 Mary Jordan Pitts | DIVORCE : NO 5209 The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled Vs | answers the issues submitted to it as follows: getty B. Scherd, by and through | DIVORCE | i her next friend, Frederick G. i The Divorce Jury 71" being duly sworn and Ernest Eugene Pitts | Shanblee | empanelled answers the issues submitted to it Es { as follows: North Carolina, In the Superior Vourt, % vs Iredell County. January l'erm 1952 Pe Joe Clinton Kcherd Mary Jordan Pitts | o vs j ISSUES NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Ernest Eugene Pitts | IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1952 I Betty B. Echerd, by and through i her next friend, Frederick G, Were the Plaintifi’ and tne defendant married and are now Husband and wife, as Chamblee, Plaintiff | set out in the Complaint? VS t ISSUES Answer _ Yes Joe Clinton Scherd — { 1 Defendant ~*~ { + 4d t i Has the Plaintiff s.ary Jordan Pitts, lived separate and apart from her husband, l. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and Ernest Lugene Pitts, for a period of two years prior to the commencement of this wife, as alleged in the complaint? Ht i, : action? Answer: yes ) : li} answer Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart irom | 1 Til each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than at Has the Plaintiff been a resident of Iredell Count -, North Carolina for a two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? : period ot six months, immediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer; __ye@ py * sa . : ° 3 . » } 1 ’ : : Answer Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifie resident of. the state of North Carolina eh ‘or more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? North Carolin SO al cian 0 ay In the superior Cort, Iredell vounty ' e wy, January Term 1952 —— Mary Jordan Pitts | NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Vs i ieee IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1952 JUUGHENT a 45 ; Betty B, io: tl at “. scherd, by and through ! c wr next Friend, “rederick G. Ernest sugene Pitts | This cause coming on to be neard and being neard at this the January Term p vhamblee , Plaintiff | 1952 of the superior Court of Iredell younty, North Jarolina, before his Honor VS | JUDGMENT Je He Clement, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered th issues "o® Clinton Echerd : ly submitted to it by the Court in favor of the Plaintif? and against the defendant, as Defendant set out in the Records; This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the +h " Su It is therefore, Perior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor J. H. Clement, ene rdered and adjudsed by the Court that the Bonds of Matrimony tof stinc ; wi Judge id | heretofore existing between the Plaintiff, Mary Jordan Pitts and the defendant, 6° Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to “ugene Pitts, be and the 5 a ° it . Ernest by the vourt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in ame are nereby dissolved and the plaintiff i8 ‘he records; ranted an absolute dive f he d gz Solute divorce from the jefendant, It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony “ H Vlement D & RES RHR He we we , ’ \ teen ns @ & “~~ her ' 8tofore existing between the plaintiff, Betty 5. icherd, and the defendant, Joe Li oA A + IN THE SUPERIOR COURT =, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘ if a SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK #= JANUARY’ TERM, 1952 i ; Monday, February 4th, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 Clinton Echerd be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granteq an NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT absolute divorce from the defendant. Ft IREDELL COUNTY J. H. Clement 4 ' « : - a on or j Judge Presiding m samuel J. Cashion, or. s i f : vs. | JUDGMENT - ’ e 4 7 | Lillian Ruth Honeycutt Cashion | i by her Guardian ad litem, Mh Buren Jurney | Mi Bi) )=— so INo. 5121 ‘i _ | NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. H. Clement, ; ett ek ; . - i ioe . : 1 | f IREDELL COUNTY Judge Presiding and a jury at the January, 1952 term of the Superior Court of ° 7. Samuel J. Cashi S i J 10 and ane] i : 1] County, and it appearing to the court that the defendant has been served A am « Cashion, Sr. vury Sworn and enpanelled as follows: Iredell County, and i pp ing t CO : 1 i 1 Flake F. Murdock, H. B. Sellers, L. 2. Crawfori, | : ahi . _ woe ~y vs. | B. L. lcCoy, C. Ww. Plyler, C. B. loore, Sr. with process; that the Superintendent of State u.ospital at Xaleigh, ', uv. has m i} saston *. comers, George Lb. Cathey, J. Donald ; — 4 | Lillian Ruth Honeycutt Cashion | Patterson, Nathan T. Neely, W. O. Weston and been served with process as is provided by law; that a <uardian ad litem has by her Guardian ad litem, Buren ve +. Jonaldson,. tana } 14 L | Jurney | been duly appointed by the court as provided by law; tnat tue suardian ad iitem ; | ISSUES has been served with process and has answered the complaint of the plaintiff; tuat a 1] } ere +} intifft na lafanAas 5 ae . 4 : - : . . » 2 ° neve ie cal al P twee af +} { : th, 1. were the plaintiff .nd the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the the guardian ad litem appointed in this cause ..as notified the next of kin of the Ad} Lh rr BPE mplaint? , s : : ‘ . 2 : as — defendant of tuis action and has conferred with certain of the defendant's closest | / e | 4 Answer: yes : sa : » a ; : a ee ee i ii — relatives; that the guardian ad litem appointed in this cause has been in touch with } iy 1 —_— - a PH 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide residen e satan , -— fe : a : ae —_—— esident of the State of North Carolina the Superintendent of State Hospital at iitaleigh with respect to this action and eh My ¥ i ‘ ‘ oe -.: for six months next preceding the institution of this action? bo ihc : ) : i : has filed a report herein in addition to his answer; and the following issues He cy Answer: yes ie) Y having been submitted to and answered by the jury: 3. Have the plaintiff the defendart 13 . I ve whe Selendant lived separate and apart for at least 1, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the bs ‘ ten consecutive years next prior to the institution of this action, without za ! cohabit ition, by reasor a tna ata’ : ‘ . complaint? H ny we O« “a incuradle insanity of tne defendant? =i ; answer: Yes, / — ee answer: _yes 9 ' és Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina aan | 4. Is the defendant suffersne ; 7 + anv suliering from incurable insanity? S * Gem a H! — *or six months next preceding the institution of this action? |} Answer: _yes c S A a m Answer: Yes, oi 5 If so has the plai . i Y ’ p eae Vhe psaintiff been suilty of : . , H = y Od nda’ * Ch en - r a ' vonduct woich has conduced the , 3. lave the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart fa at least unsoundness of nind of the defendant? a ; = ‘en consecutive years next prior to the institution of this action, without —— Answer: no — linc i . 6 ; p 6«Conhabitation, by reason of the incurable insanity of the defendant’ _ « Has the defendgnt been confined for q — | een *or ten consecutive years next precedng the BH 6 ANSwer: Yes, — institution of this act; : . - a we ¥i0n in an institut s ion for the e f the L : i care and treatment o - I d : . . 9 : tneandiew? } mentally disordored? treat § the defendant suffering from incurable insanity: a Answer: y Answer: res . es. de If SO, has the plaintiff been cuilty of conduct which has conduced the a Unsoun, ‘ —__. _ Cundness of mind of the defendant? am A ‘ a » nswer; No, y 6. Has th eceding the © defendant been confined for ten consecutive years next pr ‘ ' instit 1 a t of the J a tion of this action in an institution for the care and treatmen ¥ AA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 mentally disordered? Answer: Yes. Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, mh a zs _ ‘ : } ; a Samuel J. vashion, Sr., be ana he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the 2 defendant, Lillian Ruth iioneycutt vasnion, and that the bonds of matrimony i [' heretofore existing between tne plaintiff and t.e defendant be and they are f BH. | hereby dissolved. nt eee A Tne plaintiff snall pay to the court for tne use of suren Jurney, Guardian t ' . » . > r » t | bi, ad litem for the defendant, tne sum ot Une Hundred Dollars ($100.00). The fi | plaintiff is furtaser airected to ~ay to State nospital at Raleigh, Ni. vu, the su of 315.00 per month for tue maintainence and support oi tae derendant. This ho cause is retained ror further order. Thi ay of Fel} , 9 , This 4 day of February, 1952. J. H. clement : Judge Presiding, January 1952 Term | Iredell County Superior Vourt ' i h aa a — No. 5172 ’ a Ue NORTH we ir ; I] aA Ti } , ¥- : 7 qr - Ur Vien MULLIN iN THe SUPERIOR COURT ‘| IREDELL COUNTY oe ) William B. iecGraw |} DIVORCE HT vs " 5 Ina J : lied } : hildred Nantz |.cCGraw a ae ~tvorce eury 71" being duly sworn and empane-¢ we answers the issues submitted to it as follows: = ite, NORTH CAR LINA } ‘tT \ ’ TIT J } TiteDeLL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT William B. MeGraw = . : ba ISSUES Mildred Nantz icGraw 4 a; Did the laint#ff nA + . ; G the plaintrff and the defendant inter: oan ae ; es ome Answer. _ yes *endant intermarry as alleged in the complaint! r 1 ee hi II. Has the plaintiff p. : ~ than six months precedine the filinc vie otate of wortn Varolina ior more ae Answer ° Mates Va siding of this complai ? 7 t S ) e iS COM) aint? or © — 288 _ 7‘ | 2 ¥ aad tide Vid the det'enday ea) a — f and apart for i perk eee ftom the plaintiff and have they lived separate - answer. yes ' we wmo years or wore as alleged in the complaint? entire y } , ' i 7 or are 1 cmb eetat< Soe oad ed % hio, 5050 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY J. GC. Grant, Plaintiff, Vs. John Henry Parker, Jefendant. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from iW the defendant? Answer: NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY J. C. Grant, Plaintiff, Vs. Pp John Henry Parker, Defendant. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT a peter IES TD TSE | | an SUE { y $233.77 ft er omty he ted ~~ a ni IN 4 tia SUPERIOR COURT This cause coming on to be lieard and beinz heard before His Honor J. H. . vacment, Judge Presiding at t.e January 1952 Term of the Superior Vourt of Iredell vounty, and it ap action against the earing to the court that the plaintiff instituted the above entitled iefendant on the 23rd day of April, 1951, and that summons issued ‘ herej i ¢ ‘ . oe ee oe freln and a copy of the complaint was served upon the defendant, John Henry Parker, on the 24th day of vOhn Henry Parker, April, 1951, and that within the time allowed by law the defendent, did not answer said complaint; and it appearing to the court theta vvoment by default and inquiry was entered by the Clerk of the Superior Court of 4redel] County on ¢ v the issue &8S to damac he 7th day of June, 1951; and the jury at this term having answered es submitted to the jury as follows: © What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant? An Swer; 0233.77 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have ang With the Costs of Pecover of the defendant, John Henry Parker, the sum of $233.77, together tnis action to be taxed by the Clerk, This 4th day of February , 1952. J. H, Vlement Judge Presidinc, January 1952 Term Suverior Court of Iredell County. eK K KK KK KK HK HK HK Mk mK HK HK 1 } T IN THE SUPERIOR COURT =, — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT . 1 SECOND WEEK -- JANUARY TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 | : 4 Monday, February 4th, 1952 Mordiay, February 4th, 1952 A iM Hi if Hi t ‘a r . | Rf No. 5141 ib disbursed as follows: if : Wit NORTH CAROLINA | In the Superior Court, Lowrance Hospital, Mooresville, h, ©, e140 ,00 nt rs January Tern, 1952 Y Cavin Funeral Home 2.00 (| al IREDELL COUNTY } Be Dr. W. D. MeLelland, Mooresville, \, UC. 10.00 | | Hi c f " | a , fn : . i i Es Defendant is taxed witi the costs of this action. ql 1 Franklin UV. l.eadows, a iiinor, by { Ei 4 bi his Next Friend, l.. i. ..eadows, br J. H. Clement i | Plaintiff, Pa Presiding Judge , thle ies ; : toscoe Lee Pennell, Defendant. : Scott & Collier ‘i +. feaee if 4 By _R A Vollier ‘ i This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor J. H. Clement, Presiding Ld Bitomey for Jefendant | S " Judge of tne Fifteenth Judicial District, January, 1952 Tem, and it appearing to = Finch & Chamblee HN I the Jourt that this action is brought by i.. F. Meadows, t i F By _Finch & vhamblee | i iis ac Ss broug y i eadows, the father of Franklin D, Bttorneys for Plaintiff Hl Leadows, who, by the vlerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County l nis it i , ’ I ounty has been found uP © Keedow i 14 ae a ce ae , mark Next ¢riend — . 14 to be a fit, suitable and competent person to represent the interest of his minor ot Hi ° +} $c thi mae , : = : x Ue son, who is thirteen years of age, in this action and that counsel representing hin ui . . ; ; 1H in the action 1s carrying out and putting into effect an agreement of settlement mae No. 5222 Ht I y ste. Meadows with the defendant; NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | Reet £0 Phin seme January Term, 1952. Ana it iurcner appearinz to the Court from the evidence offered to the Vourt IREVELL COUNTY. 1 Hh / ti :; ; ; | t bs) t i lé +o a 4 ecead : 1D ’ me —4 ; ’ . . as e Ht tat on the date i ea in tne mplaint r ranklin Ms meadows was playing baseball # / i oe | ro ? * 2 . : ’ in a field in hooresvi adjacen . , _ John D, lorrow, by his hext | i ooresville adjacent to the public streets; that his ball rolled Friend, Jay Mi.’ Morrow, : : it through the fe > and ¢ c rr ; : . : " 7 | it rough the fence and across the public road; that in attempting to retrieve the Plaintiff, ; ; ball, the plaintiff, Frankli . : on ss -— 2 i » “ne plaintiii, Franklin 0. Leadows, started to cross the street without j Vs. ZJUOGHENT observing traffic : jumped f'rom ; lic j 7 1 . I | ic and jumped irom an embankment on to the street and in doing 80, '. B, Jenkins, Defendant. | landed in the sid ; endant we : a ide of tue defendant's automobile badly cutting and bruising his am) && It further app « t ft ‘ z oes - 1. ne ther appears to the Cort that the plaintiff does nat now say that This cause coming on to be heard before liis Honor J. i. vlement, he was without fa h: ap ip ee : 9 T : 3 i t fault, nor that the defendant was entirely at fault causing his Judge Presiding, and holding the regular January, 1952, Term of the superior RPMI ed Pe injury, but he does Say that t 5 ' eave Court for Iredell v 7 Sé ina, and being heard by consent of the “tere 18 a serious question of negligence; that he redell Vounty, North Varolina, 4 y i eaten —— Eamon ci — a cs would refer to make an amicable settlement with defen Parties without a jury; that the cause was eard upon the stateincnts of See as : dant and that defendant has ’ : offered to pay all ct his } counsel for id submit she Col luly 13 d - = _ pa a 7% S O€£ 6 ‘ } h + L 3 U “ 2 Si ,ed to the vv rt b a au y acense A y "iS hospital and doctor's bills, amounting to $152.00 and that both parties, and evidence submit u y 4 se l is ° ‘ ' , ! he wishes to settle his case for that payment Physician, from which it appears to the Court that the minor, John ). sorrow, vr : s i . , ll aia Morrow. 4 i q The Court finds as a Sisk tne ie eventeen years of age, by His Next Friend, Jay )\. Morrow, instituted this # ‘at the plaintiff, Franklin D. headows, has fully recovered; that there ic ; action to recover damages which he sustained because of injuries received while ~ 4 serious doubt as to plaintiff's right to recover h } against the defendant; that the offer of settler © was riding in an automobile belonging to the Defendant and driven by his son, ie nt under all the facts and circumstances in this case Allen R, J wh4 the left of are fair, just and rea venkins, which, when the brakes were applied, swerved to Sonable t I ° It is, therefore ordered 2 he the highwa d fi i mbankment; that the accident took ’ ed and decreed that plaintiff recover of the “way and finally overturning down an emban« ; ant the sum of $152.00 in full for all injuries al that this defend p) Ace on : . ‘ 70 1 Decex ~ . to . Me U. S, Highway No. / leged in the Complaint; Comber 9, 1950, shoud 9130 e'claek, Fo.to.m — amount id j t be paid into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court and ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 about four miles West of Statesville, North varolina; and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed upon a settlement of al) matters and things growing out oi tne alleged injuries set forth in the Plaintiff's Comfaint, by the terms of which the defendant has agreed to pay the sum of Thirtee, Hundred and Lichty-four Dollars ($1384.00) in full and complete settinent of the minor's alleged injuries, together with the cost of this action, And the vourt having carefully examined the evidence in the case, particularly tne evidence of the Physician, under whose care the minor was treated, and it was made to appear to the Vourt that the parents of the minor, John D, ct Morrow, are entirely satisfied with the settlement, and that Ur. James WwW. Uavis, of Javis Hospital, Statesville, worth Varolina, where the minor has made excellent recovery, considering the extent and nature of the injuries which he sustained; that after full incuiry into the matter, the Court enters the following decree: 1. That the Plaintiff recover of the Defendant the sum of Thirteen Hundred and Lighty-four Dollars (1364.00), to be paid by the Defendant into the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell Coun y, North Carolina. i ‘ Le nat out oi the trunds paid id to him, the Clerk shall pay for the hospital, te oy 1 ow 14 © t 5 lh __— my ’ , : ms . doctor's, and medical services, the sum of Three Ilundred and Eichty-four Dollars (2384.00); to the firm o: ‘aymer & swaymer, counsel for the Plaintiff, who prosecute 4 } . t- 4 ec - ~ . ro * : 4 ° ae - ° une minor's cause to a successful determination and has recovered gor the benefit of the Plaintiff the sg “ , } . _ - ; sate ¢ Sun approved by this Court, the sum of Two Hundred Dollars 200.00 which the vo d ( 00), en th ) reasonable charge ror the services rendered. defer jan nay th AAaG n— @bh2 < f ant vi ie cost of this action to be taxed by 1 he Vierk of the Superior Court, ibs 4510aU Uni ce B : ] \ s aC SCUVLILEON Dé Ww ne e: € € e ) consent nent st een tne artl ry ont I 2d , approved by the UX fe not 1 P Pi Oy Ourt is not unreasonable or unjust to the minor Plaintiff, but to his best interest, Signed an 4 entere A * : . o ar ‘ . : n otatesvil] Cy horth varolina, on February 4, 1952. J. H, Jlement Judge Presiding By Consent: Jay M. horrow Next ot rriend of Minor Plaintiff A. B. Raymer Attorney for the Plaintiff C, H, Dearman Attorney for the JVefendant aso By Py oan Maia Ft ae! ed Tae eee Sac R aida mati 2. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --=- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 tio, 1237 gTaTE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUP#RIOR COURT COUNTY OF IRED“LL DOCKET NO. 1237 -VS- ) state of North Carolina | ORDER REVOKING PROBATION James Sipes, Vefendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard at the February 4, 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior vourt before the lionorable J. H. Uloment, Judge Presiding, being held in the Vity of Statesville, vVounty of Iredell, North Carolina, upon the report ol State Probation Ufficer Lacy W. blue, the defendant being in Court in person sHERLUPUI 1. Tnat on August 2, 1949 in Iredell Superior Court, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to the crime of Ureaking, intering, and Larceny and was sentenced to serve Three to sive Years in the State Prison in Raleigh, N. U., which sentence was suspended and the defendant placed on probation for a period oi rive Years under the supervision o1 the North Carolina Ffrobation vommission and its Officers under tne -eneral conditions of srobation and the special condition that he not urink wine, whiskey or beer at any time. the 2. The above named defendant has wiliully violated following condition of the probation judgm nt: On July 9, 1951, the defendant was tooresville, \. 4, oi tne crine of Issuing a Baa vneck and was sentenced to serve Thirty Vays on the This o:fense is in violation of condition (j) "Violate no penal law or any state or the ederal Government an be oi general goou behavior". IT Is, THEREYURE, ORDERS JEVAoLU toaat tie probation convicted in Recorder's vourt, roads h 3 4 VAUGe 4lia wo ; AUJI UG, Phat be and is hereby REVUKLU and te sentence of Three to Five Years in the State Prison heretofore suspended is ordered into effect. This the & day of February, 1952. J. H, viement UJGs PReolJiNG the court finds the following facts: rperensr és SECOND WEEK e-- JANUARY TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 Monday, February 4th, 1952 i | No. 5196 | | NORTH CAROLINA, INTHE SUPERLOR COURT and nature of the injuries which she sustained; that after full incuiry into the matter, the Court enters the followin: decree: ’ fp = -TRAVELL COUNTY. January Term, 1952 1, That the Plaintiff recover of the Jefendant the sum of Five Hundred i Martha Jane Norton, by her { a ee ie es ‘tyenine Dollars (3579.00), to be paid by the Defendant into the Office i i Next Friend, Ray Norton, f= and Seventy@nin ee P i _— { c ; a ” ; : a Sneed bs ; k } ior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina H Hl Plaintiff, . of the Clerk of the Super r v y, North ° ' 1 | _M EN a 2, That out of the funds paid to him, the Clerk shall pay to the Uavis f Vs. JUDGHENT 1 | i gy " ‘ . . . ° 1 h i oe : 4 4 a eiical ; j \ h vs ina, f do r's and m al rvices, the t DH | Atlantic Greyhound Corporation, F) Hospital in Statesville, North Carolina, for docto i medical services, : : # of Richmond, Virginia, and J. &, hilby. | 2 s . A ee : : ! = it 4 sun of Twenty-nine Doliars ($29.00); to Baxter Finch, Attorney, for services in } i Defendants. 3 i © §©connection with the representation of the minor, the sum of Fifty Dollars (50.00) ' - This cause coming on to be heard before His nonor J. H. Clement, a i _ 3 whieh the Court finds is a reasonable charge for services rendered. ; Judge Presiding, and holding tue regular January, 1952, Term of Superior Court for ; ae ; 3. That the Defendant pay the cost of this action to be taxed by tne j | Y mnssen4 Naw } ’ micéys e , 4 2 = 7 ee a an + o ‘. ¢ . £ a} ; a Iredell vounty, lorth Carolina, and being heard by consent of the parties without ; i ‘a t | Clerk of the Superior Court. F a jury; that the cause was heard upon statements ot counsel for both parties, i f | 4 vid thet oe ¢ , ; 4. That the settlement between the parties, entered by consent, and | mi evidence Suomittea to tue vourt that tne minor, ..artna dane orton, sixteen + 3 3 , ’ : } ae mir » Plantnti ff } vears ol : bv ner Nex rip , ‘ , 3 approved by the Court is not unreasonable or unjust to the minor Plaintiff, but i years ol are, by ner Next #rliend, ay orton, instituted tnis action to recover ; " . | ; ! i damages which she sustained because oi injuries received wnen tne automobile in } is to her best interest. ff mn 4 | | Pe - , - 96 | q; whica she was riding, driven by .owarg Lee warren, and which collided with an ‘ Signed and entered in Statesville, North Carolina, on february 4, 1952. | f Pi ee t al) gutomobile being criven by Dorothy Smith Lentz, on U. S. Highway No. 64 several . i. teas a! J. H, Clement s iles st of it +) t ‘ oad .% . . a - 7 ‘ . $ Judge Presiding 4 a4) ides sast oi Statesville, North Carolina; that it is olleged in the Plaintiff's S © ! u q vomplaint that the collisi wae Atinendt he he ‘ , tnd ph BY CONSENT. 5 M1 9° pl t 1at ne collision waS caused { y Vile iriver ol the Defendant's ous, woich wuts s | ww . : . ; = 1! waS pasSing the car in which the Plaintiff Was ridine pI ed over to the right / Ray Norton — © ” . ® “ext or rriend of Tinor Plaintiff ad too quickly, causing the dri eae : 2 H | q 7% % vhe Griver, .oward Lee Warren, to lose control of the car 6 -Baxter/?4r salar a) ; Tet ‘ 2nec i ~~ in a when it ran into and C ‘ded seh + . 2 5 : Se ‘ orne ror the Plaii ti : 4 i i to and collided with tne automobile driven by Dorothy Smith Lents; : 74 ntafft | “Gr ; that the accident occurred on Noven} : 3 ve ii, Dearman q wi Us vA UL WOVeND ‘ed > ) ah- e > . Lt + 7 = 1 ember Le, 1951, about 4:30 o'clock P. }..; that 4 attorney for tue Delendant ome) | the Jefendant's Answer specifically denicd ; ; . 4 +a on aisy Genied negligence, and it appearing to the i Court that the Plaintiff an - oui f , ‘sainviit and Defendant have agreed upon the settlement of all . i matters and thin : 4 * — «(A ic aa VSS GF OWANE OUt Of the allesad intustase «ct © * ? hy , C inu al -Cgea injuries set Llortn in the O. 5108 aachel Udessa connor vs Garfield Vong. sfeeeneueeoee-orweern Continued : Plainti rts , mplaiy ¢ +) » ee | vne terms of whic] he fends r é . os ~ Waach the Jefendant has agreed to my mB ‘No. 5140 John oss Bowie vs Ruby York Bowie <--------------------- -Continued the sum oi Five nundred and eee — - os ™ = = : SG geventyenine Dollars ($579.0 in f lete i : +4EPrsS (9579.00) in f and comple iN 3 oe ere | ia : -00) ull a P "Oo 5163 Donald F, Lambert vs Willie liae Torrence Lambert --------- Continued i emenw O. the minor's a} ered in: s y Ht" vt 4 24 injuries together with the ca: of this actione : ae a oe vom Soe Oe ee oe “io. 5184 Nancy P Reavis BNF Robert Leo Reavis -e-------------= --Continued if And the vourt havine carer 1] , y * Meavis SNE VS oper e Cava ms | i 46a ad areiu Ly exaninea + 1e evide . ; ly / ied the iaence in the case, io, 5) ‘ a d | , , 9 Martha H 7 is Sneal Hirai y Speaks -----------Continue pane | particularly the evidence o{ the Physician ; eated , rtna h l.orrison Speaks vs Hiram vewey ~pea — | EVAN AGM, Under whose care the minor was tr ’ No 5) ' . ; d ° oe . - ° D R } ah ? VY at ah4 eee cesses easeaecas eee 2 ee ee@ vontinue | and it was made to appear to the court ¢ 37 Ketchie vs Mollie Ketcnie i 2 cl uv ie , ur nat the ynare . . , Jane ut : . “= nts bs ha 4} , nA A 2 sae ee (‘AY 2 Norton ee ©» 4679 A Rochlin vs P S West Construction Co Inc------ Continued by Consent —_ a ; are entirely ent4 ats ; . ’ d ~ iVIlSiied With th sad wit e@ settlerp nt and +? ry . 4 of \N “ent, and that Dr. NM. Be Cree, 10. 4849 Jennie 3 Q w Pe t Adams Davis Hospital, Statesville, tiorth c he Admrs of es Fe WD eee ey eer nconneoseContinued for PAdlasiee a » North varolina, where the of th n hi joan ««------- ‘a minor was treated, is Opinion that the minor has ° minor has made excellent recovery ’ considering the extent and | H | fe 2 cee oi : ~ IN THE. SUPERIOR. COURT. - SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM Monday, February 4th, 195 1952 R N Sloan vs Monroe Adams, W R Battley Admr of M G Sloan, dec «----------------- --Continued for Plaintire Mary Liza Sain BNF vs Clyde Ray Randleman & Wn Knight ~-----Continued Juanita G Jain vs Clyde Ray Randleman & Wm EB Knight -----Continueg Billie G liller vs Clyde tay Randleman & Wm E knight ----Continueg Dixie Plywood Co of Savannah, Ine vs Morrison- Lael f4xture vorp « The Travelers Indemnity Co Cle) ) tt eee Continued for Defendant Piedmont Bank trust vo vs oteve Talbert, w a Hobbs, J L Youn rhomas stnoreland-Continued for Plaintiff Gorden vity Plating « hfg Co, vorp vs worrison-Lael sixture Vorp ine Travelers indemnity VO0-----------------------. ~----=-Continued for Defendant iwcnelil ulenn Glenn Gilleland vs i. i : alma weseimore, n y mehe 44h U weseimore=----- ---Continued b, Jonsent INo 20 ir S y ro} e 5207 AL Sims vs Dave S Browne------~--.----~.~. vontinued for Plaintiff INo. 5023 Ellis 7 Bailey T/A fhe iiudson Baile 1int vo vs 2 Fox T/A T ack Fox Paint Co ; ( j ly @ ACK Sox Paint Co qnw0-2-2-- 2. on enue --Continued as Lollows: te B. Sellers, L. &. crawford, Be s.00re, OF. . vathey, da Jonaid Yonaldson and : ec 4 ; Ve fae ¢ ler, Ve ~e sie recess until Tuesday “orning, This Honorable vourt takes 1952, at 9:30 A, “ a r S 4 , ecess until fuesday horning, February 5th, tae 0D Sku, pp alt | vo N * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, February 5th, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, February 5th, 1952 at 9:30 A. i. No. 4974 Catherine Phillips, Plaintiff, VS. Marvin King and Wife, Mary Alice King, J. ©, Martin, Lenoir Finance b Company, and walter EL, Lee, H Defendants. —~ en 1. Was the note, dateu September 23, 1950, for 3500.00, given to the plaintiff by the defendants, Marvin King apd Mary Alice King, and endorsed by J. C, l.artin, secured by a chattel mortgage on the “ord automobile dated Septeriber 23, 1950, and recorded in Chattel lortg.ge Book 185, page 222? yes Answer: nortgage secured by a note for FE second Does the plaintiff hold a J. UO, Martin, evidencing a balance due on tne purchase price e described in the complaint? Answer: yes 3. if so, what esmount, is due and owing on said note? . Answer: 475.00 with interest at 6, from Sept. 29, 1°50. he defendant, Lenoir Finance Company on February ©, 1951, automobile without foreclosing its first lien chattel mortgace, as alleged in the further answer of J. C, hartin? Answer: yes 5. What was the reasonable market value of said automobile on Decer ber >, 1950, when the car was turned over to tlie defendant, Finance Company, by King? Answer: 31550.00 6. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of J. ©, answer: 475.00 with interest at 65 from Sept 29, 1950 7 | 7. What amount, if any is tne defendant, J. C, Martin, entitled to re a Cover of Lenoir Finance Company to be applied on the note ot Marvin King and wif *» endorsed by him, as described in the complaint? Answer: _ $350.00 IN THE SUP#RIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TEith, 1952 Tuesday, February 5th, 1952 8. Is the Jiability or the defendant, alter H, Lee, secondary to that a ot defendant, Lenoir Finance Company? Answer: yes 9. What amount, if any, was the defendants, marvin King and wife, indebted to tne Lenoir rinance Vompany on December 6, 1950? Answer: _}1200.00 Vefenuants Lenoir inance vo excepts to tue submission of issue Fl a ’ vps No. 5054 Joe I ills vs W Ross Day & George H Smith Continued vy sy. ¥ nat ~ Tt m : > : ° - NO.» 50 lL J is oOCnaler vs JOnn a mill er « wile tlaine i Mill er--Continued by Vonsent Wednesday Morning, February 6th, Vii i { 7 J Y UD Cy MALL 1 oa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, February 6th, 1952 This Honorable Vourtconvenes according to adjournment on Wednesday norning, February 6th, 1952 at 9:30 A. M. No. 4974 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT > IREDELL COUNTY vatherine Phillips, Plaintiff vs. Marvin King and wife, Mary Alice King, J, C, sartin, Lenoir rinance Vompany and Walter &, Lee, Defendants ee THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the January 1952 term ot tne Superior Court of Iredell County, and the following issues having been issued to and answered by the jury: 1. Was the note, dated September 23, 1950, for 3500.00, given to the plaintiff by the defendants, Marvin King and Mary Alice King, and endorsed by J. C. Martin, secured by a chattel mortgage on the “ord automobile dated September 23, 1950, and recorded in Chattel ortgage Book 185, page 222? Answer: Yes 2. Does the plaintiff hold a second mortgage secured by a note tor 9500.00, endorsed by J. C. Martin, evidencing a balance due on the purchase Price of the automobile described in the complaint? answer: Yes 3. If so, what amount, if any, is due and owing on said note? Answer: 3475.00 with interest at 6jo from Sept. 29, 1950 4. Uid the defendant, Lenoir Finance vompany, on February &, 1951, Wongfully sell said automobile without foreclosing its first lien chattel mortgage as ° . ‘ . o. 6 alleged in the further answer of J. CG, Martin? Answer: Yes 5. What was the reasonable market value of said automobile on Vecember 6, 1950, when the car was turned over to the defendant, Finance Company, by King? Answer: $1550.00 ae —- ee <p ae Do te eee _ spaeneoanleee he eas eee Martin, have and recover of the aef'endant Mary Alice King, on September <3, 1950, that as between the cefendants defendant Walter &. Lee's liability inance Company; and that the costs of this IN THE SUPERIOR CCURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, February 6th, 1952 6. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of J, ¢, Martin? Answer: $475.00 with interest at 6% from Sept. 29, 1950 7. What amount, if any, is the defendant, J. C. Martin, entitled to recover of Lenoir Finance Company, to be applied on the note of Marvin King and wife, endorsed by him, as described in the complaint? Answer: 350,00 8. Is the liability of the defendant, Walter 4, Lee, secondary to that of defendant, Lenoir Finance Vompany? Answer: Yes 9. What amount, if any, was the defendant, marvin King and wife, indebted to the Lenoir “inance Vo: pany on December 6, 1950? AnSwer: %31200,00 NOW THERsrORE it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of tle defendant, J. C. wartin, tne sum of 3475.00 with interest at Oj per annum from the 29th day of September 1950; that the defendant, J. ¥, Lenoir “finance vompany, the sum @ #330.00 to be applied on the note given to the plaintitf by ».arvin King and wife, tor 3500.00 and endorsed by J. cv. /.artin; » Lenoir inance Jompany and Walter E. Lee, the is secondary to the liability of the Lenoir action are to be taxed against Lenoir Finance Co, This 6 day of February, 1952, J. H, Clement Judge Presiding Wo. 4974 Catherine Phillips, vs. Marvin King and wife Et Al, . APPEAL ENTRIES, — SS Upon the com i ing in of the verdict oi the jury the defendant, Lenoir Finance Compan mov pervs moves to set the same aside as being contrary to the weight of the evident Motion denied, Defendant excepted. The defendant moves for a new trial for ort committed. Motion denied, Vefendant excepted, 2 Judgment signed as appears i SRL ITA LO a sient) ea ape eae spades! SPU AEN he Se he ns 8S , i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECUND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, February 6th, 1952 To the judgment as signed the defendant objected in open court, excepted, record . and gave notice of appeal to the supreme Court. Further notice waived. Appeal bond for cost of $100.00 adjudged sufficient. By consent of the parties, the defendant, Lenoir Finance Company, is allowed 60 days to make up and serve case on appeal, and the appellee allowed 60 days thereafter to serve countercase or file exceptions. Thais the 6th day of February, 1952, J. H, Clement Judge Presiding No, 5033 WORTH CAROLINA, IN Tis SUPERIOR LOURT, IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARYe rEBRUARY Tako, 1952 otatesville brick Company, vs. frank H, Crow, —— SS qj, = © Cc G J This cause coming on to be neard and being heard before His Honor, ve i, vlement, and a jury at the January Term, 1952, of Iredell Superior Court, and it appeari : - —T ee appearing to the vourt, after hearing the evidence of the plaintitf, that the notion > aed ‘ . ‘ ion of non-suit on the part ol the defendant is well taken and snould be sustai bins : ae a ained, and that the evidence of the plaintiff is not sufficient to make out a Case; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion for juie . e : : vMement of non-suit be, and the same is hereby sustained and this case is dismis . +), ‘ . ‘ : } S@€d and the plaintiff is taxed with the cost. Jone this the 6th day of February, 1952. Ji pet phement —_ udge Presiding, To the Coregoing judgment the plaintiff objects and excepts and gives Notice of appeal to the “uprene vourt in open court, further notice waived. Avpeal . bond for cost at $100.00 adjudged sufficient. By consent of the parties, Pla intiff is allowed 60 days to make up and serve case on appeal, and the defendant allow one ae days thereafter to serve countercase or file exceptions. J. H,. Clement Judge Presiding. Kee KEKE RK RK KK KK KK mw IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-- JANUARY TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, February 6th, 1952 Thursday, February 7th, 1952 Xs: = 25 Cas This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Thursday = = Aio, 5090 S C Morrison T/A Electrical Supplies vs R R Compton & Grady Loftin T/A Compton Electric Co--Continued for Defendzy February 7th, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A. MM, | ; morning, H “No. 5111 Lonnie G Goforth vs franklin Sigmon ----- were ne nnn Continued by Cons ent 4io. 5157 AP Steadman vs D W Scott, L B Lyerly & L V Coggins-Vontinued by Consent INo. 5079 No. NORTH CAROLINA co [iba IN THe SUPERLOR COURT a 5 Holmes Vrug Company, 4 Corporation es > 5 ~ + +’ ; a f } Pending trial of this case the vourt takes a recess until Thursday Moning, | NO~ 5079 | Jury sworn and em , 4 ne :, ; E panelled as follows’ 4 eal OTR it irs JB Flanigan Aqmrx of Flake i. hurdock, A. L. Smith, L. R. Crawford 2 = IREDELL COUNTY t Estate of irs 5 fr Avery ee: movers “es 4, Blackwelder, Robert L,. Brawley, a vrs. Je Be Flanigan, Administratrix | BH, | Gas' on f, vomers, WwW. H. Wagner, J. Vonald Patterson 4 of the Estate of Mrs. S. F. Avery, | i " ce oG U. weston, L, L. Donaldson and Thomas C, Harris, Me deceased { it Holm : Plaintiff ' moimes Upug +O, A VOrp | 3 ' i is. JUDGMENT { q | : " { I 3 Defendant ane ; This cause coming on to be heard ana being heard before His Honor, —— * John H. Clement, Judge Presiding at tne January - February Term of tne Superior + me Fe TY = aT. cee, Wada ae Poe re Jourt of Iredell County and it appearing to the court from the statement of counsel that all matters oi controversy set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, ana that tne defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff and the 7 a a ‘\ 4 plaintiff nas agreed to accept the Sum of Iwo Thousand Five Hunared Vollars (32,500.00) ) and the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction thereot; Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed trat tne plaintiff nave and recover of the defendant tie sum of 4wo ‘nousand rive Hundred se taxed by the Clerk. Vollars (42,500.00) and the costs oi tnis action to t a wR Pep This 7th day of February, 1952. J. H. Viement —_ ad vonsent: Judge Presiding Fe firm of Finch & Vhamblee » 6&y Frederick G, Chamblee 4 ttomey for Plaintiff “Y Baxter i. Finch attorney for Plaintiff rk ee rj ae ' i rm of Lewis, Lewis and vimons Sectatemantes i *y J. G, Lewis Attorney for Plaintiff by ~2con hh. Simons by J G Lewis Attorney for Plaintirt ‘im of of adams, Vearman and Winberry yo ep ‘hursday Morning, February 7th, “ttorney for Vefendant This Honorable vourt t akes a recess 1952, at 9:30 o'clock 4 until ‘ JUDGE 61 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SEQJND WEEK --- JANUARY veg Pg 52 SECOND WEEK #-- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Thursday, February 7th, 5 Thursday, February 7th, 1952 { ) ‘ { IN THE SUPERIOR COURT . | Ino. 5217 nd prosecute his counter-case, or the same would be uismissed. It appearing to the ny a } ns ‘ourt that the defenuant and his counsel were advised ol tue case on tiie calendar for We | ’ %S t In the Superior CU i North Carolina, | January Tern i952. . having failed to come in and i ; | é . 7 defen: 2 ( come a prose 2 sc -cl: | Iredell County. ’ = trial and the defendant naving i@ in and prosecute his counter-claim Hy i b Hi 1114 ila hae lie ak eek ie aa | ea i Aa j margaret brown Williamson I > against the plaintiff's, the same is dismissed by default anu for lack of evidence. At i , { Ey , t Teh i ie ' : j 1 eh Lip vs t ORUER 3 It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by tue Vourt that the f i ? ; 4 3 i y ‘ { ik | i a Hugh Hadley williamson | * plaintiffs are the owners of tne property described in the Vomplaint and are Ui 1 i } ‘ ps + | os i} ' " ' " ; / | This cause coming on to be heard ana being heard at this Term of tie m entitled to tue possession thereof. tne defendant is taxed with tne costs otf this Aa aad | ; ee : ' j iy i 4 7 1 if superior Court or Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Jd, H, Vlement, 7 action 1 Ri: I ; ‘ Se RL Pa yt : J. H, Clement eam : . +" QY y © } c : Bi > 4 } H ! } : Judge Presiding, aiter notice to the uelendant, upon tne pleadings and affidavits 4 Presiding Judge i i i ed \ i 0 H r i a : ‘ ; ee : BS a filed in the caus e, and tne oral testlim ny ol the ael endant, and it appearing to 4 2c ; . ; i} i" | the Vourt that the plaintif! ana defendant are husband and wife, and that they ‘a ; ted | H ) 0. 4683 oie eames . 1H H ss : cane 4 - : . rr 1lti 195] a ane : the cust bys NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE JU! ptlLOR COURT Ee 1! j i nave ne nianct child born on Uctober tn, Jt, Who 15 now in Une > uUStoay ol IREDELL SOUNTY.« January lerm, 1952 ne iff t laintiff, ana tnat they are é ' ‘Ban the plaintiff, and that the defenuant abnnuoned the plaint ana tne _ ; et Mn le psainvili, an ‘ - = aia y = irs. Nova 5. fowler | a | [ sa , i Plaintiff, yt Heal , now livin; seperate and apart trom eacn ouner: i Vs- i JUDGHENT ie Wi i . te eae ae H 4 * . ; . , Jans : ° t _. it is, Lnerefore, ordered and aasudged by the vourt that the defendant Atlantic Company, trading locally | t | i Hi as the Iredell] Ice ruel Company, mitre | — pay into tne office or the vlerk of this Vvourt for the use and benefit of the ANC ey Hii i Vefendant. | plaintiff and said infant chil i Sum a 3125.00 per month, the first payment 0! it ae ec (YY) + var : ics ae ; af This is mj heard before His Honor, ¢, H,. vlemenit Judge i i} L256 O be paid into said office oi the vlerk of this Vourt on the 15th.day 0 This cause coming on to be hear elo ary v, ) y ; , ; a 4 Se eee : : ad ‘ Presidin and holuing the rerular January, 1952, Term of the ouperior Lourt tor ¥ P | reoruar' » « Dky and a like sur on the 15t! iay each and every month thereafter 8) 5 7) ’ ) 4 : : 7 : . / ; tredell County, North Varolina, and being heard by consent of the parties without \ i until e fir leter y t ON. ’ ’ & d i 4) : a jury; that it appears on statements ot counsel for both parties that all matters AP it irbuer uurt that the defendant pay the sum 0} ; if fp nd things growing out of the allegations in the Pleadings have been agreed upon and 4 »45 OO inte ¢ j yee cyt nr ee > , . + 5 c nee $ Hy ° nwo Salil rks orice by the lst day of March, 1952, for the use and be é 4) ’ ; » 6Settled, and by the terms ot the settlement between the parties, the Vefendant has _— v Oh 1M e ve Gy LOWIS, Attorney for the | laintiff, tor services rendered up vo i this date, B reed to pay tie Plaintiff the sum of Two Hundred Dollars (200,00), together with m | fhis February 71 159 “He Cost of this action, — + A dhe a TN Ai do, THEREFORE, ORDERED, AUJUDGED, AND Devitiond that the Plaintiff ee 2 = ® U a i Pt ’ s 6ecover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred Vollars ($200.00), together with the : | 5O86A BS cost of ‘ . ; : ‘ ee »O86A ost of this action to be taxed by the VUlerk of this vourt. - / North 4 irolina { | ' . . . oi in the Superior vourt i 952 | Iredell County, | jenteey thee ae 9 vigned and entered in Statesville, North varolina, on rebruary 7, 1952. John C, Weiters and ~ ) harie seiters, a ie pent m si " ; : Si¢ 1G vs - SY CONSENT: —e ' James i’, Li on 'uvVDVGKMKENT s3 i, Adams D hi This caus farman & Winber eae ©ause coming on ¢ > aie a Sm Jlement, Attor - : : ye n to be neard before His Honor, J. He Cle heys for the Plaint¥?f i at the January 1952 Ter ~ ; y avee term of Iredell ‘uperior Vourt apd it appearing to or ne 7 oe ae " /Ourt that the defendant a imits tl described Roe taeda de : j “ve She ownership a the personal property YS for the vefendat i a in the Vorplaint and se <a Hi oss . vu in 8 ta Wh to - ty 1P 8a Countererlaim ¢ be due i or amounts claimed to i i, Upon the call of the Case, ¢ me 1 ne defendant was called out in open Court to © IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --= JANUARY TERM, 1952 Thursday, February 7th, 1052 Ko = 4174 North Varolina, Iredellvounty. In the Superior Court. January Term, 1952. Mary D. Ash Craig VS. JUUVGMENT Ludwig Ash, dr. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard betore Honorable J, } . . vlement, Judge Assigned to hold Vourt in the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Varolina, upon a petition and motion filed in the cause by the defendant, Ludwig ’ ash, drs, for an order for the plaintiff to show cause why she should not be attached for contempt for her failure to comply with the terms of the modified order which was Signed and entered in the original action entitled, "Mary U. Ash vs. Ludwig ish, Jr." on the 22nd day of Aug 947, wh ti ) ash, ° the 1d day ot August, 1947, whereby the defendant, Ludwig Ash, Jdr., waS given part-time custody oi lary UJ. Ash, the infant child of the plaintiff and defendant, and it appearing to the Vourt and the VJourt finds trom all of the evidenc hat sary s] 53 i nintite e that “ary 0. ash craig, the plaintiff, has subsecuently been divorced from the defendant and has remarri anes ai : } 4S remarried dames a, vpaig of Forsyth County, North Varolina, has without legal justitication wilful], Sled gal justification wilfully failed and refused to comply with the terns of said modifi der ; ciel odified order, and it further appears to the vourt that the sajd Mary D, Ash Lraig, the plaintiff, has exvress . ’ ‘ ADPress ] ner O11 » as expressed in open court through her counsel that she will hereafter f r nie wi {ter fully comply with all of the terms and provisions of the said modified court order, It is therefore, hereby co ti ; -OyY Considered, ordered and aliudged that whereas the said, lary as willful} ” 429 Wliil ler Fae . ame . = ‘ ilully failed and refused to comply with tne terms and provisions of the wodified order issued in this cause on Aurust 22, 19h/, and whereas the said plaint Plaintiff, wary D0, Ash vraiz, has promised in open court throug her counsel to fully cor : t Uully comply with pay With the terms and provisions of’ the said modified order relative to the vartetime oa: ' A 4i.€ -U Vv vy } 1 Btody by the defendant, Ludwig Ash, Jr., of the said Mary UD. Ash that the 1 ; SP es ; : a9 plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the a Clerk. 4nis the 5th day of february, 1952 79 4 7 J. H. Clement Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WERK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Thursday, February 7th, 1952 ‘NO. W174 North Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court. January Term, 1952. vary D. Ash vraig “ JUDGMENT Ludwig Ash, Jr- This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Honoraole J, He Clement, Judge Assigned to hold Courts in the Fifteenth Judicia] Vistrict of North Carolina, upon a petition and motion filed in the cause by the plaintiff, Mary D, Ash Craig, that an order in the original cause dated August 22, 1947, giving the defendant part-time custody oi his minor child, ary U. Ash, be vacated or modified; that tne said order was issued in the original action entitlea, "Wary D. Ash va. Ludwig ash, dr.", and It appearing to the Court and tne vourt finds from all of tne evidence that at all times that the defendant has nad the child, liary D, Ash, in his care, custody and control that he has properly looked aiter and cared for the child and has provided ser in his home with a splendid environment, care and attention, and the Court further finds that he is a person ot good character and tnat he is held in high esteem by the citizens of the community in which he lives; that he is a proper person to have the part-time custody or his child, \.ary UD. Ash. It is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered anu ad judged that the petition and motion by the plaintiff tnat the Order referred to dated August 22, 1947, oe vacated or modified, is hereby denied and it is further ordered tnat tne plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by tne vlerk. This the 5th day of rebruary, 1952. J. H. Clement Judge Presiding aK #166 7A NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY state of North Varolina vs, | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Jonn Tyck i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J, ' Qn "+ Clement, Judge Presiding in the January-February Term of Superior Cowt, Ire dell County, North Carolina; And it appearing to the Court that the defendant, John L, Tuck, was ar nested and arraigned in the City of Statesville, North Carolina, in April, 1949, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Thursday, February 7th, 1952 and charged with being drunk and disorderly; that the petitioner herein, \ather Johnson, signed the aefendant's appearance bond in the sum or $50.00, as surety; that the defendant failed to appear for trial as required; that as a result thereo? ’ said petitioner was required, as surety on the said bond, to pay into the court the sum of 350,00 thereon; And it further appearing to the court tiat at the time the Said recogni. zance was forfeited, the court below failed to follow the proper procedure as reouired by the General Statutes of orth Carolina for the forfeiture of such recognizances, in that said petitioner never had an opportunity to come in and shoy cause why said bond should not be forfeited; And it further appearing to the vourt that the aefendant, John L. Tuck, was later arrested,, through the positive efforts oi this petitioner; that as a . result thereor, the aboveenamed defendant was brought to trial and tried for the Same charge for which the aforesaid recornizance was forfeited, and at the time of his trial, the court below failed to provide any redress for this petitioner, concerning this forfeiture; and it a» earing that the court below had such Opportunity to require the defendant to make such redress; ] ; Y s rore “jer ad 4% . ‘ ; . ami tt d it 1S now, tnerefore, order 1, adjudged, and decreed as permitted uncer the General Statutes of horth varolina, 15-116 that the forfeited recognizance as paid by said petitioner, namely the sum of $50.00, be and is hereby ordered remitted to said petitioner by the soard of sducation for Iredell Jounty, North var ing and/ » ft > ,unty ar ° . . oa te arolina, and/or the n a 4i vouissioners for Iredell County, Norta varolina, whichever board accepted and used said torfeited recognizance. this the 7th day ot february, 1952. J, H, vlement | Judge Presiding \No. 5086 Dp tT Piedmont Lumber & it's Go. I C hg ne . ; vs 7 Sworn and empanelled as follows: W 6 Harkey & wife Lena & Harkey Pending trial the voy ij i v Ourt witodraws a Juror and orders a mistrial. vase Vontinued, No. 5028 '.oldply vorporation vs Homel.ade No. 5155 Carolina vommission vo Ine vs Couch Grocery 7 Wo. 5156 Irs EA Myers T/A yers sire Service ys UW Davis -.-.-.--Continued Wo. 5072 Mp Tilley VS Mrs Josie Jor 7 * ~-----Continued IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1952 Thursday, february 7th, 1952 Ko. 4585 Alice & Renegar vs John R Renegar ------.--~~----------Continued tio, 5065 Fred W Hudson vs Moor Food Store Inc «-----------------Continued Ho. 5191 Shaver Motor Lo Inc et al vs City of Statesville -<-----Continued Mo. 5172 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY William 8, McGraw Vs. JULGMENT Mildred Nantz McGraw This c ause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January term, 1952 Superior vourt of Iredell County, before His Honor J. H, Ulement, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; and it appearing to the Vourt that there was born of the marriage ot the plaintiff and the defendant a child, Yvonne McGraw Cox, who is married and now living with her husband, IT IS THEREFORE, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds olf matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, This the 4th day of February, 1952. J, H. Clement Judge Presiding Poot 23 pen ee = pe IE oe a “Ait Sa No. 5139 orth Carolina In the Superior Court D caaa Before the Clerk Irede 0 Bunch Hatchery Vs. JUVGMENT OF NON@SUIT R, L. Brinson This cause coming on to be heard before the Vlerk of this court and it appearing to the court that all matters have been adjusted between the parties and that defendant is not now indebted to the plaintiff in any amount. It is therefore decreed on motion of plaintiff that the action be dismissed. February 4th, 1952 CU, G, Smith Ulerk of the ouperior vourt Agreed to R A Collier Attaney for Plaintiff SP ee RGEeE SORE BRERA SD BH Wo, 5204 North Carolina. | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. Auto Parts and Electric Company, Plaintiff, vs JUDGMENT Varley Webb, Defendant This cause coming t be heard, and being heard before the Honorable . G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, and it *ppearing to the court from the statement of the attomeys for the plaintiff that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjuiged and decreed that the plaintiff be n ., “nsuited and be taxed with the costs of the action to be charged by the Ulerk. This the 6th of February, 1952. C. G, Smith Clerk oF Superior Court. Yonsented to: SCOIT & COLLIER "et errr “orneys Tor the Plaintiff xe K Ke KR Ke eR KK HH =. INO. 5011 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Sinclair Refining Lo. vs. | JUDGMENT OF NON@SUIT Zeb V. Simmons j This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of this court and it appearing to the court that all matters have been adjusted between the parties and that defendant is not now indebted to the plaintiff in any amount, It is therefore decreed on motion of plaintiff that the action be dismissy, This the 9th day of February, 1952. GC. Ge Smith Vlerk of the Superior Court ‘NO. 5155 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL JOUNTY Carolina Commission Company, Inc., Plaintiff vs. A. W. Couch, trading and doing business as A. W. Couch, Grocery, Defendant JUDG LNT This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. H, ing at the January Term of the Superior Court of tredell ing to the Court from the Statement of counsel that all parties, and ti plaintiff has agreed to accept th in full accord and satisfaction thereof; Now, therefore, b it is plaintiff have and te y Consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the cover of : this action to be tanca : the Chere, meant the sum of $696.56 and the costs & This 19th day of February, 1952. C. G,. Smith vierk Superior Court. Consent: Kenneth Tnomas Attorney for Plaintiff LAND, SOWSRS AND AVERY BY Land, Sowers, % Ave Attorneys for Defendant ME, North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1952 ¢, M. Deaton vs. Mooresville Building a Loan Association This cause coming on to be heard upon the report of «4. V. Turlington, attorney for A. W, Colson, liquidating trustee, and it appearing that all the assets ot the Mooresville Building and Loan Association have been collected and that a final disbursement has been made to all certificate holders amounting to .8849 of the amount of each certificate. It further appearing that Mrs. C, H. Howard, a certificate holder, cannot be DA Zé YS LiF f located, that the amount of her final disbursement is $12.73, one cneck dated March ’ 4/1947 TW, L itthia Judh Uf ? ( Dy 1949, for $145.00% ¢ Pe It is therefore ordered and adjudged tiuat the amount of $12.73 and 345.00 be paid over to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County for the use of the said Mrs. LU, H, Howard. It is further ordered and adjudged that the final disbursement of the funds of the Mooresville Building and Loan Association be and the same is hereby approved, J. H. Clement , Judge Holaing vourt oft the 15th Judicial District. A : ; NORTH CAROLINA, In eee tt ore That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized | IREDELL COUNTY. z © ~=sverified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that Wesco Waterpaints, Inc., the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery Plaintiff, the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A", the of ™ sun of Three HyndredSixty-Seven Dollars and Twenty-nine cents ($367.29), FINAL JUDGMENT | ) 1 1H W, D. Fox, Trading and { > together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from . | 1 } | " et SGuaey doing business as hack | bi Fox Paint Co. ; May 31, 1951, until paid. | \| \ 1 siiassiaiene : I? IS, THEREFORE, CUNSIDERZD, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the |, =) ; - ; ; ; a | | iif This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned 4 plaintiff recover of the re W. D. gi _ and doing business as | | iil i t Clerk of the Syperior Court of Iredell vounty, North Carolina, on this 25th day ee ee OFA Os, He ONE OF. PD Semen Semtprteren Dersere eee a I Hi | of February, 1952, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attarneys for the cents ($367.29), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per Hy i plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Vourt: | aun tren May 32, 2951, wanid pata, vegether with the cost oF this Se i || ie -l- by the Court. That on December 17, 1951, the pla This the 25th day of February, 1952. intiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell . fi . “ c . ie County. E C. G, Smith | ' : ; 5) ae ent er ay ee +o Po enenae , eee nee en aeE enn EneNnTN ee SE SR “Clerk of superior Court of Iredell County. 2 -<= 3t + 3 mw mwe we we Ke mK HK we KK HK HK HK HK HK bY A a ee a i t n c fy ’ oT SS a tanita enema ae To te money due for werehandise sold and delivered “lerk of Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that and agreement of th to the defendant under the contrast ; Of the defendant t © pay a certain su m therefor; > . - : ‘N a : vheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. m+ NERS ) =3 _ North Carolina In The Superior Court | if Thes the euse aa Iredell Count BEFORE THE CLERK ) i; ons was served on the defendant by Sam Laws, Deputy Sheriff 7 _ : it of Iredell County, on Decem ; My : ecember 17, 1951, by leaving with the defendant a copy of cnee nee T/A 1 - 1 the summons, together with a copy of the complaint , ance cLean Sales Co, i l : Plaintiff : : - : 1? bine That the time f he a : Vs. JUDGMENT | or the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time Addie G I alowed by law for the defend ; co Owns nae : a ae 5 ’ o HH ! nga nt to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, ee Curlee, | ae ading or motion h a 48 neen filed by the defendant, ; Defendants i a i “7 = i That the verified complaint £3 | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned 4 filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in d Summons in Claim and Delivery was issued September 6th, 1950; that said that an itemized poem ified n | verified statement, marked "Exhibit An Summons has not been returned by the sheriff showing service of same and that » WaS attached to, and made a part of the the complaint, which Statement set fort h the merchandi defendant is not in Court; se purch the ; purchase, and the P ased, the date of price to b I be 7 rome therefor, and Contained all debits and credits tis, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action arising out of the transaction, and the Same is hereby dismissed, This the 27th day of February, 1952. C, G, 3S Keke ke eee HEH NO. 4970 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THe CLERK Vance McLean, an individual doing business as Vance McLean Sales Company Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. Charles W, Brown ee Defendant j" This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the court that summons in Ulaim and Uelivery was issued on November 29th, 1950 and complaint filed on said date; that said summons has not been returned by the sheriff Showing service of same and that the defendant is not in Court; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be and the same is hereby dismissed, This the 27th day ot February, 1952. WO. 3872 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk, John W. Reich { JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Vs. | H. L. Pence | This cause Coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk oft the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non-suit: mo ‘herefore, ordered ana adjudged by the vourt that this cause be, 4m I if ) the same is hereby dismissed and hon~suited, and tne plaintiff is adjudged to P4 the costs of the action, This February 28, 1952, C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court. - Count North Carolina. a Se eke ee , *S tte eeene @ flo, 5234 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court Before the Clerk {4 Furniture Company, aot linois Corporation, Plaintiff, , JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Vs. {lutz-Schafer Furniture Company, Incorporated, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk ot’ the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearir to the Court from the statement ol Adams, Vearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntay nonsuit; IT IS, THEXEFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AnD DECREED, Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary non- suit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the vlerk of Court. This the 3rdday of March, 1952. CU. G, Smith Clerk of Superior vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina. CONSEN VED Tu: adams, Dearman and winberry Attorneys for the plaintiff BY: ? Monroe Adams wu KK KK KK Ke HK He we Ke oo: ee 4 ‘ ‘ 3 3 i INO. 5212 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Simmons Company, | Plaintiff, | Vs. , JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Klutz-Schafer Furniture Company, { Incorporated, Defendant. | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court oi Iredell vounty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and tliat the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; IT IS, @HEREFORE, CONSIDERED, URVEXED, ADJUDGEU ANU DECREED, Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plajntiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, ind that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of Vourt. This the 3rd day of larch, 1952 Uierk of Superior court of lIredeil vounty, North Carolina. CONSSNTED TO: Adams, Dearman and Winberry Attorneys for the plaintiff, BY: Monroe Adans awe, REE Basen NO. 5211 ORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. The Mebane Company, ! Plaintiff, { te. | JUDGMENT O* VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Klutz-Schafer Furniture Vompany, ! Incorporated, i Defendant. { This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Atteneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit: IT IS, TikREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDEXED, ADJUDGED AND DECRELD, Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the vUlerk of Court, This the 3rd day of March, 1952. C,. G,omith | vlerk of Superior Vourt of Iredell County ) North Carolina. Tee Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, BY iNO. 5208 In the Superior Court NORTH CAROLINA, Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. Franklin Shockey Company, i Plaintiff, | Vs. } JUDGMENT Or VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Klutz-Schafer furniture vVompany, | Incorporated, This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Defendant. vlerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appear- ing to the vourt from the statement or adaus, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to tase a voluntary nonsuit: Nrimr of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs ol this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of Court. This the 3rd day ot’ March, 1952, “Ve G. Smith vlerk of Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina. Vonsented To: Adams, Dearman and winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, BY Monroe Adams i, ER RAR MNO. 5205 In the Superior Court OLINA NORTH CAR Before the Clerk JREDELL COUNTY. Unagusta Manufacturing Corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT O# VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Klutz-Schafer Furniture Company, Incorporated, Defendant. Thia cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Admas, Dearman and sinberry, attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the vlerk of Court. This the 3rdday of March, 1952. UC. G. Smith Tlerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. CONSENTED TO: Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, BY Monroe Adams cm | os ae YE ET! ILE ats) eee) Ce . JNO. 5200 In the Superior Court NORTH VAROLINA, Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. Peerless Mattress Company, Pla; ntiff, Vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Klutz-Schafer *urniture Vompany, Incorporated, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the vourt from the statement of Adams, Dearman and winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; ar we, FORE, CUNSIDERED, ODEKED, ADJUDGED ahd DECREEJ, upon Motion of adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, ana tnis action uismissed and terminated as oi voluntary nonsuit, and that tue costs oi this action be taxed against tue plaintiff by the Ulerk oi Court. This the 3rd day of March, 1952. C. G, Smith vlerk ot Syperior Court ol Tredell vounty, Worth Carolina. CONSENTED TO: Adams, Dearman and winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, BY: Monroe Adanis No. 5198 yoRTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. The Century Furniture Vompany, Plaintiff, JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT VSe Klutz-Schafer Furniture Company, Incorporated, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Norta Varolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, ana that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, Onunanl, ADJUDGED AND JECREED, Upon notion of Adams, Dearman and winverry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as oi voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of vourt. This the 3rd day of March, 1952. Cc. G. Smith — - — ~ “Terk of superior Vourt ol Tredell County, North Carolina. , Comp ry VUNOENIED LO: Adams, Dearman and Winberry, co cmd Attorneys for the plaintiff, BY: Monroe Adams NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Wallace Jewelers, Inc. Plaintiff Vs. R. 5S. Godfrey, Jr., Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Jourt of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action of the 6th day of January, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that said Surm.ons together with a copy oi said complaint were served on the defendant on the 8th day of January, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or Other pleadings has been filed by the defendant and no extension ot time to file pleadings has beep granted, and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the Contract, namely, the sum of Seventy & 38/100 Dollars; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the plaintiff claims the right to the possession of a wedding ring set in order that he may sell the same as Provided in a certain conditional sales contract executed by the jefendant, and that ancillary to this action the plaintiff caused to be issued claim and delivery papers for said property, and thereunder now has the same in his Possession; N I te we OM, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum ot $70.38, that he be declared entitled to the Possession of the Sajd property, and that he be allowed to sell h a j and j the same as by law provided and credit the amount received therefor, less the ic ; S legal costs of saiq Sale, upon the monetary judgment herein rendered, and that the phaintiff recover of the defendant the costs of this action This 4 day of March, 1952, C, G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court thee eee ee ee ho. 5229 In the Superior Court "ORTH CAROLINA — IREDELL COUNTY ; th Davidson iirian Smd Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. Cc, Lawson R. Defendant THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable ¢, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County North Carolina, and Ve . ’ it appearing to the court that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in this action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be ’ nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 5th day of March, 1952. CGC. G. Smith ‘ Uierk Superior Court Consented to: Land, Sowers & avery WI Ward, Jr, Attorney for the Plaintairfr IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday, March 10th, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1952 Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and Younty aforesaid, on the 10th day ot “arch, 1952, A. D., when and where His Honor, J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding and Holding Vourts for the Fifteenth Judicial District March Term, 1952, is present and presiding. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff ot Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the March Term, 1952, Iredell County Superior vourt, to-wit: George F. Tilley J. Neely Kincaid Mrs. C, R. Bailey B. G, Walsh, Sr. irs. Pearl Smith Mrs. C, C, McElroy IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday, March 10th, 1952 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived eparate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the 8 institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes . 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes . NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1952. Harold H. Tomlinson Everett Wilhelm Hal M. Hill deme ¥. Dorders | | i JUDGMENT D, Christopher Anderson Nash John W, Elam V8e | . Ho ma |) \ -,¢ i i as Jas. Cecil E, Miller Gladys Alverson Borders i A, Arthurs nhdmond Cashion H. V. Fox ye G. P, Miller YU. a, Horn Mack Sample A . ‘ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the | | : C. W. Brown ve Me Robbins Rockwell Culp | i Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His honor, J. H. Clement, i W. L, Orren O. B. Frick | 1 A. J. Haynes J. R, Allison Sherman Mitchell J. E. Honeycutt Hal W. Clark Fred R, McLain B. G. Walsh, Sr and 0. B. Frick were excused by the Court. J. A. Arthurs was excused on Doctor's certificate, Mrs. Pearl Smith and lirs, C, t. Bailey were excused by the Clerk The following men constitute what Snall hereinafter be termed the "Divorce Ju #1" to- . a aan ry #1" to-wit: George F, tilley, Harold H. Tomlinson, R. D. Christopher, G. P. Miller, Cc. Ww, Brown, W, L. Orren, A. J, Haynes, J. E, Honeycutt, J. Neely Kincaid, Everett Wilhelm, Anderson Nash and Jas. Edmond Cashion Wo. 5213 James F, Borders ve 1 DIvorce Gladys Alverson Borders The Divorce Jury #1" empanelled ans : follows: mF Being duly sworn and t as NORTH CAROLINA, Ssues submitted to i IREDELL COUNTY: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MA ‘DM James F. Borders RCH TERM, 1952, + vs. ! ISSUES | Did the plaintirer and def husband and wife, Gladys Alverson Borders i. endant marry each other, and are they now plaint? 48 alleged in the com Answer: si Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, James Ff. Borders, and the defendant, Gladys Alverson Borders, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, J. H, Clement Judge Presiding wR KR KR Ke ee km oe eK eK OK OK LY ) & . a — . eee eee rl " FY a na nena IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday, March 16th, 1952 Wo. 5220 Annie Mae A. Nicks } DIVORCE | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanel ej vs. answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Spencer M. Nicks North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell Vounty Annie Mae A. Nicks | VS. ) ISSUES Spencer I. Nicks | 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes — 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Varolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: yes North Carolina Iredell County In the Superior Court Annie Mae A. Nicks { vs. { JUDGMENT Spencer ii. Nicks | T i his cause Coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, the Undersi C iding <« igned Judge Presiding and a jury at the march Term or the Superior Court of Iredell J \ , , C ounty, and it appearing to the court that the defendant has been ersonally served wit} p y @ with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the i She senslaiatt Plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged im Answer: "Yes n 2. 3+ Has the plaintires Carolina f been a bona f 5 th Or Six months next Preceding the bringing of react tte state “<a Answer: "Yeg,n Now, therefore, it is ordered ’ adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff . Carolina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday, March 10th, 1952 e Mae A, Nicks be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the Anni det'endant Spencer M. Nicks, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing e between the plaintiff anda the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk. This the 10th day of March, 1952. J. H. Viement ~dudge rresiding ‘sa ee ED ‘tae ee Ee No. 5199 DIVORCE The divorce jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers tiie issues submitted to it as follows: Martha H. Morrison Speaks, Vs I i Hiram Dewey Speaks | NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MaRCH TERM, 19§2 Martha H. Morrison Speaks, Plaintiff Vs Hiram Dewey Speaks Defendant 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: _ Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA, TREDELL COUNTY , Martha 4 IN THE SUP&RIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 : Morrison Speaks, Plaintiff Vs JUDGMENT ‘iran Dewey Speaks This Cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of -=* IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday, March 10th, 1952 the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, before, His Honor J. H, Clement, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the vourt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the records It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Martha H. Norrison Speaks, and tne defendant, Hiram Dewey Speaks be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, J. H. Clement Judge Presiding x< NO. 5199 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1952 Martha H. Morrison Speaks, Plaintiff Vs ORDER FOR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD Hiram Dewey Speaks This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by J. H. Clement Judge Presiding at the January Term, 1952, Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court and tue Court finding as a fact: 1. Ti ; : - ' e at one minor child, namely Alvin Vewey Speaks, was born to the ; i ee ee : . : 1 union ol Martha H. Morrison “peaks and Hiram Vewey Speaks, said child now being 3 years ot ace, Zs Tt ‘te tne : : oe inti hat said minor child is now 4iving with his mother, the plaintiff, and that said child has ro heh ue iild has lived with his movner ever since the plaintiff and the defendant separated on or about the of July, 1948, and that during said , time the defen Hiram ! , h dant, Hiram Dewey Speaks, has contributed nothing for the support and maintena f said chila . nce of said child, and that Said child has been wholly supported and maintained by its mother, Martha H, Morrison Speaks o 3+ The Court further finds as a fact that Martha H. Morrison Speaks the mother oi the chi sa fi + the child is a fit ang Suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor chi ha ' ile, and that the best incerest ot said child would be served bY the child bein s in the control of the mother at this time, IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Ae That Ms, I H i ; “artha H. Morrison “peaks, the plaintiff, mother of the minor be, and she is hereby granted the custo IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday, March loth’, 1952 Alvin Dewey Speaks. 2, That the plaintiff pay the cost ol the proceeding. 3 This cause is retained for further orders, including the custody of the child. It further appears to the Court that the above entitled action was brought by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of two years separation, and that the defendant filed no answer praying for the custody of the minor child, and that a judgement granting the plaintiff an absolute divorce from the defendant has already been entered at this term of the Iredell County Superior Court. This 10 day oi Mar. 1952. J. He. Clement -dudge Presiding NO, 518, DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it Vs. as follows: Nancy P. Reavis, by Her Next | of Friend, L. P. Parish, | Robert Leo Reavis NORTH CAROLINA, in the h porace. oes Laren lerm, IREDELL CUUNTY. Nancy P, Reavis, by Her Next of Friend, L, P. Parish Plaintiff, | | Vs, j { ‘obert Leo Reavis Vefendant. 1, Did the Plaintiff, Nancy P. Reavis, and the Defendant, Robert Leo Reavis, intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER Yes ° 2. Have the Plaintiff, Nancy P. Reavis, and the Defendant, Robert Leo ‘eavis, lived Separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years imnediately prior to the commencement oi this action? ANSWER Yeg ° 3. Has the Plaintiff, Nancy P. Reavis, been a bona fide resident of the “tate of North Carolina for one year immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday, March loth, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA, In the ee Court March Term, 1952, IREDELL COUNTY. Nancy P. Reavis, by Her Next of Friend, L. P. Parish, Plaintiff, Vs. Robert Leo Reavis, ! 1 I | JUDGMENT ! Vefendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor J. i. vlement, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the March Term, 1952, Superior vourt of Iredell Vounty, North Varolina, and the following issues having been Submitted to, and answered by the jury, to-wit: iia 1. Did the Plaintiff, wancy P, Reavis, and the Defendant, Robert eo Reavis, intermarry as alleged in the vomplaint? ANSWER Yes . -_—_-eoo 9 h Dp . . Tr) . 1 Ps t ila sini Have the Plaintiff, Nancy P, Reavis, and the Defendant, Robert Leo Reavis, ived Separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? . ANSWER _ Yes . —_—___— } the P ite a y ‘ . 3. Has the Plaintiff, Nancy P, neavis, been a bona fide resident ol the State oi North Caroli oa : of this action? lina for one year immediately preceding the commencement ANSWER Yes T Baas cai dau he Court finds that tue Plaintiff, Nancy P, Reavis, is a minor and appears in this action by and through her Next of Friend, her Father, L. P. Pari ) arish, who was properly and legally appointed to such Capacity by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell vounty. The Court inds . urt further finds that Sumions was duly served on the Defendant by publicati i he S svi Dai y p cation in the Statesville Daily, a newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina 4 , » and that the last publication of this icici aii pecenber Ah 1951, and th . at Summons was served as provided by law, and the Defendant was prope’ before the Court, The Court : further finds that one child, Roger Lee Reavis, was born to th marriage union on September 10, 1949 IT Is THERE Dt > > ’ “ORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the bonds of matri mony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant * N 2 +e R a 8, is & absolute divorce from the Jefendant » Robert Leo R 8 action be paid by the cavis. Let the cost of tht Plaintirr, wid IN THE SUP“RIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday, March 10th, 1952 Entered at Statesville, Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, on March 10, 19526 J. H. Clement Judge Presidng koe OK OK KK OK Ok Kk eK ok ok we Ka Ok ho. 5230 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL COUNTY Lillian Gant Skeen | _ ! ORDER Oi REMOVAL James Reid Skeen j Upon motion of the plaintiff in the above entitled cause it appearing that action for divorce on the grounds of two years separation and for the custody o the minor children named in the complaint for the removal of the cause from Iredell County to Alexander County to be tried at the next term of said court which is to be by statute beginning on the 14th day of April, 1952. It is therefore considered, ordered and directed that said cause be and the same is hereby transfered to Alexander County for trial. It is further ordered that Notice be published in the Statesville Daily a newspaper published in the City of Statesville for one week giving notice oi such removal to Alexander County. The Clerk of this Court is directed to transfer the papers to the vlerk of Superior Court of Alexander County. This March 10th, 1952. J. H. Clement Judge Presiding KRM KH KK KK KK Ke KK we KK KK HK flo. 5108 Rachel Odessa Connor vs Garfield Connor ------------------- Continued Wo. 5224, Jane Norris Threatt va Rance Kelly Threatt ---------------- Continued Mo. 4710 ¢ B Myers & wife vs D O Cowan, Jr @t @] coenenonoceecoecece Continued Mo. W711 cB hyers & wife vs W B Crowson & wife Dorothy Crowson et al-Continued “No. 4942 Rachel Christenburry vs Travis Carpenter ------------------ Continued “Ho. 498, Travis Carpenter vs M F Crouch T/A Crouch Taxie Co et al---Continued “0. 5020 Vance McBride vs William M Herrin -------------- Continued by consent Alo. 5028 Ho. 5076 Moldply Corporation vs Home Made Chair Co ---Continued for Defendant Raymond Milstead vs Lewis Torrence ------- ------Continued by Consent IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Monday March 10th, 1952 inasiaheiicaiactoniraectoubeclaisu yal ~~-Continued by Consent ae No. 5111 Lonnie G Goforth vs Franklin Sigmon 9 ‘i No. 5183 Donald F Lambert vs Willie Mae Torrence Lambert -----Continued by Consent E. jj No. 5201 Parks Andrews McLean et al vs Town ol Mooresville,---Continued by Consent eh , No. 3921 James L warren vs Bertha hae Murdock & husband W L Murdock----- Continued ae _ et be) No . L079 ‘| ve 4 A Rochlin | Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: ¥ ‘ Geo. F, Tilley, Harold H. Tomlinson, R. D, vs | Christopher, G. P. Miller, o. W. Brown, W, L, Orren, A. J. Haynes, Jd. E, Honeycutt, J. Neely Kincaid, Everett Wilhelm, Anderson Nash and P S West Construction Co Ine | Cashion. : ; JaASe De Pending trial of this case, the Court takes a recess until Wednesday 4 orning. aN ee A . Beh Uk “A Mareh 12th, This Honora ; ble Court takes a recess until Wednesday Mornin 1952,at 9:30 o'clock A. M, * , TE CRETE Reg ACTOR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Wednesday, March 12th, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday jiorning, March 12th, 1952, at 9:30 otclock A. M. , 521h bce caila) fo. ofROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY jesslz L. SCOTT | MARCH TE. ron Ete DIVORCE . Tne Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers F VS. | the issues submitted to it as follows: 209A BELLE scoTt t WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM JESSIE L. SCOTT | ' ROSA BELLE SCOTT 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry 4s alleged in the complaint? Answer. _ yeS___» Il. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state of North Carolina, Irede}l County for more than six months preceding tue filing of this complaint? Answer. _yes ° III. Did the plaintiff separa te from the defendant anc nave they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in tne complaint? Answer. yes - NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM IREDELL COUNTY vessie L, Scott | V la ' ee | JUDGMENT ‘08a Belle Scott { This cause coming on to be heard, ana being heard at the March term, 1952 ou : , er Perior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor J. H. Clements, Judge presiding issues submitted to 4t in favor jury, and the jury having answered all the as fully appears in and the record: of th : € plaintiff and against the defendant, it a . Ppearing to the Court that no children were born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant, MARCH TERM, 1952 Wednesday, March 12th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 ee ee eee 1, That the Plaintiff have and recover against the Defendants the sum yndred Fifty Dollars ($750.00); that a prior payment in the amount of of Seven H If IS, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of sixty-five Dollars and Fifty Cents ($65.50), paid by the Defendants, M. F. Crouch, matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, ang vixey C i Company, and J. 0. Bradshaw, will be credited tl : : aie en e Crouch Taxicab Vompany, . Ss ’ . e lited on the the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute Trading as portion of the Judgment to be paid by them; that the cost of the action / : : -half divorce from the defendant. one-hal This the 12 day of March, 1952 pe taxed against the Defendants by the Clerk of Court. 4 Mc 2 - “+ 5] 4 ° Jo He cl Signed and entered in Statesville, North Carolina, on March 11, 1952. e He Clement 7 Judge Presiding. J. H. vlement Judge Presiding CUNSENTED TO: ‘No. 49h2 William XR, Pope — : Mttorneys for tne !laintiff. NORTH CaROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Land, Sowers & ayery IREDSLL COUNTY. March Term, 1952. Kttorneys for the Defendant Travis Uarpenter. Rachel Christenbury, | Adams, Dearman & Wwinberry . Plaintiff, | Kttorneys for h. r. Urouch, Trading as Crouch Taxicab Company, and Vs, | CUNSENT JUDGMENT J, 0. Bradshaw. Travis Carpenter and M, F. Crouch, | Trading as crouch Toxicab Company, and J. O. Bradshaw, ! Vefendants, ! m0. 498), NCRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT This cause coming on for hearing before His Honor, J. H. Clement, Juage IREDELL COUNTY. March Term, 1952. Presiding, at the larch, 1952, Term oi the Iredell County Superior Court, Travis Carpenter, ! and it appearing that this action was instituted by the Plaintiff to recover Plaintiff, i w damages for personal injuries suffered | her when a taxicab, driven by the Vs, ri JUDGMENT Of NONSUIT AND RELEASE T Vefendant, J. U. Bradsnaw, owned t ’ ie #, Crouch, Trading as Urouch Taxicab ie nn eee Trading as | vrouch Taxi Com Seenany. and a 1049 BP , , . .. mpany, and Vompany, and a 1947 Ford automobile owned and operated by the Defendant, Travis %. U, Bradshaw, ; { varpenter, were involved in a lites ‘ -) : ; [ arper » Were involved in a collision at the intersection of Statesville Defendants. X Avenue and Irede venue 3 hea Caee af : ‘ \ r ll Avenue in the Yity of Mooresville, North Carolina, on September 22, 1949; it further ann ” ae — This cause coming on for a hearing before His Honor, J. H. Clement, Judge ge . ) : appearing to the Vourt from the statements 0 Presiding, at the March, 1952, Term of the Iredell County Superior vourt, and it sen | tor all par si involved in this litigation that all the matters in appearing that this action was instituted by the Plaintiff to recover damages gig between the parties ari; ing upon the pleadines have been settled; to his 1947 ¥ord automobile which was involved in an accident with a taxicab a ) : Wie of ayes the Plaintiff is to have and recover of delonging to the defendant, i.. #. Crouch, Trading as Crouch Taxi Company, and the Def ints the sum of Seven tundredFifty Dollars ($750.00); that a prior driven by the Defendant, J, 0. Bradshaw, at the intersection of Statesville ayment in t! e af Siviw. 6s payments an the amount of Sixty-five Dollars and Fifty Cents ($65.50), paid by Avenue the Defendants tlh and Iredell Avenue in the City of Mooresville, North Carolina on y eH. Vrouch, Trading as Crouch Taxicab Company, and Je 0. ept : ; ~ © Bradshaw, will be cred Plember 22, 1949; that in addition to his Answer, the Defendant, hi. F. Crouch, +¢ , tho Ran saved on the one-half portion of the judement to be paid Trad . by them; that the cost of ‘NE a8 Crouch Taxi Company, filed a counter claim in which he sought to the action be taxed against the defendants by the rec ‘ Clerk of Court, ver damages to his taxicab; it further appearing to the Vourt from the r\1, mie State . NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT 1g. oxperen | ments of the Attorneys for the Plaintiff and Defendants that all matters y Of 29, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: settled; i ig ban ie in c “ntroversy between the parties arising upon the pleadings have been cae: —— ee ee = MARCH TERM, 1952 Wednesday, March l2th, 1952 that the Plaintiff does not choose to pursue his cause of action and desires to take a nonsuit as to his original cause of action; that likewise, the Defendant, hk. F, Crouch, Trading as Crouch Taxi Company, does not choose to pursue his counter claim and desires to have the action dismissed; that both parties desire that tnis Judgment snall operate as a complete release, barring each party from maintaining any future action upon the facts alleged in the pleadings herein; that the Plaintiff has agreed to sumbit to a voluntary nonsuit as to his cause ot action, and the Defendant, M. ¥. Crouch, Trading as Crouch Taxi Company, has agreed to sumbit to a dismissal of his counter claim. NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, Is Is, ORDsRED, ADJUUGED, ANU DECREED: 1. That the Plaintiff's cause o: action against the Defendants be, and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that the Plaintiff is forever barred from instituting or maintaining any future action, based upon the facts alleged in his Complaint in this cause. 2. That the counter claim of the Defendant, M, *. Crouch, Trading as vrouch Taxi Company, against the Plaintiff be, and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that the Vefendant, hi. F. vrouch, Trading as Crouch Taxi Company, is forever barred from instituting or maintaining any future action, based upon his answer and counter claim filed in this cause, 3. That the cost oi this action be taxed one-half against the Plaintiff, and one-half against the defendants, vtgned and entered in Statesville, North Carolina, on March 11, 1952. J. H. Clement Judge Presiding CUNSENTED TO: Land, Sowers & Avery Attorneys for Plaintir?r Adams, Dearman & Winoerry Attorneys for Defendants, Ke » i” “Qe eR RH KH a a Tar SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 Wednesday, March 12th, 1952 No. 5210 yorTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT J sworn and empapelled as follows: U. M. Robbins §, 1. Ingram, Hal W. Clark, Mrs. &. U. McElroy, Hal M,. Hill, John’ Plaintiff j W. Elam, H. ¥. Fox, Mack Sample, Rockwell Culp, Cecil E. Miller, Sherman Mitchell, Fred R, McLain and y I J. H. Rickert. Se Walter F, Hudspeth, | ISSUE Defendant i What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant? Answer: Yes the Plaintiff is entitled to $300.00 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR VOURT IREDELL COUNTY S. T. Ingram Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. ~ | ' | Walter F, Hudspeth Defendant - This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding at the March 1952 Civil Term of the Superior vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff instituted the above entitled action against the defendant on the 29th day of December, 1951, and that summons issued herein and a copy of the complaint was served upon the defendant, Walter F, Hudsoeth, on the lst day of January, 1952, and that within the time allowed by law the defendant, Walter F, Huaspeth, did not “nswer said complaint; and it appearing to the court that a judgment by default and inquiry was entered by the Clerk oi the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 7th day of February, 1952, and the jury at this term having answered the igsue as to damages submitted to the jury as follows: the What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover fram defendant? Answer: $300.00 . laintiff Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that = 0.00, to~ have and recover of the defendant, Walter F. Hudspeth, the sum of Gane ether with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. { J. H, Clement sugeasbiredtsee aROEL POkaEp oma This 12 day of March, 1952. "HE SUPERIOR COUR ‘N_THESUPERIOR-COURT MARCH TERM, 1952 —~ _ MARCH TERM, 1952 Wednesday, March 12th, 1952 Wednesday, March \ 12th, 1952 INo. 5054 No. 4679 Joe I. Mills, Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: C, M, R Rochlin ! i Hal W. Clark, Mrs. C, C, McElroy, Hal M. Hila, “ge | A. Bo ’ 4 Plaintiff, W, Elam, H, ¥. Fox, Mack Sample, Rockwell Culp Plaintiff, | Bi Cecil E, Miller, Sherman Mitchell, Fred R. McLain and | ee r i W. Ross Day and | AA | . _Day an p, S, West Construction ri George H. Smith, ISSUES. Company, Inc., | ; i Defendants. Defendant. j melee P ‘i 1. What amount, if any, are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff | 1, Did the plaintiff and the defendant enter into an agreement whereby ie : a on the note set forth in the complaint? F the defendant agreed to build a house for the plaintiff on East Front Street in hi Answer: _nothing Statesville, N. C., with side-walk and all improvements, and convey said house 4 2. Did the defendant, W, Ross Day, sign the note sued on in this and lot to the plaintiff at a cost of between j10,000 and $11,000, the exact | ah action as surety? amount to be itemized and furnished to the plaintiff upon completion of the j | Answer: no house? tr | A | 3. Was said note signed without any consideration? Answer: ___yesS im ah Answer; yes 2. Did the defendant breach said contract, as alleged in the complaint, i 4. Did the plaintiff prucure the signature of George H. Smith to the by refusing to convey the house to the plaintiff for a sum between 310,000 and i My note by fraud? $11,000? j wi yy ’ ° F va An Swer: no ie . Answer: _ yes ibis | / : 4 3. Did the plaintiff and defendant enter into an agreement that the i, | ——. defendant would construct a house on a lot on East Front Street in Statesville, | N. C,, the defendant to furnish the labor and material for the construction of . Said house and the defendant to have as compensation 10% on the cost of the douse and the agreed cost of the la? Answer; no Ps == 4, Did the plaintiff breach said contract and refuse to take the property, 88 alleged in the answer? Answer: no iH d+ What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: 1,000.00 without interest. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, March 13, ’ at 9:30 A, M. 1952 N_THE OR MARCH TERM, 1952 Thursday, March 13, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes xcording to adjournment on Thursday Morning, tiarch 13, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A, M. ‘No. 5173 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Hal M Hill, Mack Sample, Rockwell Culp, Cecil E Miller Sherman Mitchell, Fred k McLain, J. H. Rickert, L f Warren, vs R D Christopher, C W Brown, J E Honeycutt, J Neely Kincaid and Anderson Nash. Mildred Mayes Alexander Harry R, Alexander Issues 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes 2. Has tne plaintiff been a resident of the otate ot North Carolina for more six months imuediately preceding the commencement ot this action? Answer. Yes 3. Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Mildred Mayes Alexander vs ! Judgment Harry 2. Alexander | This cause coming on to be heard at this March Civil Term 1952 of the Superior Vourt or Iredell County, North varolina before Honorable J. H. Clement, J P si Thy ar S$ oa . udge Presiding, and a vury, and issues having been submitted to the Jury and answered as follows: 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married aS alleged in the complaint? 2. 4H h int . ; aS the plaintiff been a resident of the State ot North Carolina for than six months immediately 36 preceding the commencement of this action? Dic id the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? n z It is, the he co » therefore, by the vourt ordered, adjudged and deaeed that the bonds of matrimony her y etofore existing between the Plaintiff, Mildred Mayes Alexander, and the defendant, Harry i, Alexander, be and they are hereby dissolved and that the matrimony, t MARCH TERM, 1952 Thrusday, March 13th, 1952 NOs 5054 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, 0 Iredell County. March Term, 1952, Joe I, Mills, Vs. JUDGMENT W. Ross Day and George H. Smith This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term ot the Superior Vourt ol Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, ana the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the defendants ana against tne plaintiff, as set forth in the record: It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover noting of the defendants, W. Koss Vay and George H. Smith, and that the costs of this action are taxed against the plaintiff, Joe I. Mills, H, Clement E NO. 4679 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY A, Rochlin, Plaintiff, JUDGMENT Vs. P. S, West Construction vompany, Inc., Defendant. { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before ie. Sener, H h ; the "He Clement, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the March 1952 Civil term of “uperior Court of Iredell County, and the jury having answered the issues Submitted to them as follows: 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant enter into an a. yereby the defendant agreed to build a house for the plaintiff on a Street in Statesville, N. C., with side-walk and all impr gremems® and i000" Said house and lot to the plaintiff at a cost of between y ry an sinulartte 0 "oe amount to be itemized and furnished to the plaintirf up © house? Answer: "Yegt in the complaint, 2. Did the defendant breach said contract, as alleged 000 and i tween $10 sla pou to convey the house to the plaintiff for a sum be ’ Answer: "Yes" IN Tie Suuoa COURT in THE SUPeRTOR COURT CH TERM, 1952 RCH TERM, 1952 Thursday, March’13th, 1952 ' Thursday, March’13th, 3952 3. Did the plaintiff and defendant enter into an agreement that th defendant would construct a house on a lot on East Front Street in Statesville RTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, N. C., the defendant to furnish the labor and material for the construction of No said house and the defendant to have as compensation 10% on the cost of the DELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1952. house and the agreed cost of the lot? IRE 5, ¢, Morrison Trading as Electrical Answer: "No" n Supplies, 4. Did the plaintiff breach said contract and refuse to take the j i i property, as alleged in the answer? i | JUDGYENT. VS. ’ | a ' ; “ae* } R, Compton and Grady Loftin a! — - - tials as Compton Electric Co., ry 5. Wnat amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the ili defendant? This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Li Answer: "$1,000 without interest" Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Jd. H. hi Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff Clement, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues | i have and recover of the defendant the sum otf One Thousand ($1,000) Dollars, to- submitted to it by the Court as set out in the record: gether with the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the vourt that tne This the 13 day of larch, 1952, plaintiff recover of the defendant, K, KX, Compton, the sum of 3350.00, and the | Jeli, Clement said defendant Compton is taxed with the cost of this action. Judge Presiding need | This the 13th day of March, 1952. : J, H, Clement APPEAL ENTRIES Judge Presiding. Defendant moves to set the verdict aSide. Motion denied. Exception. To se __~ The the foresoing judgment the defendant objects and excepts and fives notice of No. 5168 bg } " . ” ‘ s 7 ¢ “wT r ‘ It my = Peal to the supreme Court in open court. Further notice waived. Appeal bond NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 3) ‘ * a S500 poe : 7 for costs of }100 adjudged sufficient. By consent of the parties defendant is » —-«s TREDELL COUNTY i f ) t all d sixty (6 ’ l owed sixty (60) days to make up and serve case on appeal, and the plaintiff Carolina Motor Company | Jury sworn and empanelled as porn, 7 a Se eens Se allowed eiuty or a Corporation Sample, Rockwell Culp, Cecil ©, Miller, vherman hitehet., s owed sixty (60) days thereafter to serve counter case or file exception. ’Plaintiff Fred R: MeLain, J H Rickert, L. I, Warren, Re De . Christopher, C, «, Brown, J. ©, Honeycutt, e. Neely J. H, Clement Vs. {| Kincaid and Anderson Nash. | udge Presiding ‘ on ; Mrs, E, oe Burd Hy VMK Kw ke me ee a a sea 4 i S S U E pe ‘No. 5090 Defendant | ( AR 8. C. Morrison, Trad What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the : | Electrical Supplies, ~ as | ai Sworn and empanelled as follows: Geo. F. defendants? | Plaintifr, | 0 ey, Harold H. Tomlinson, G. P. Miller, W, L, ; . 7 Robba’ Ae J. Haynes, Everett Wilhelm, C. M. A ——" vs Joh ins, J. R, Allison, Mrs. C. C, McElroy, nswer: $1085.00 6 onn W, Slam, H. V, Fox and Hal W. Clark. . e He. Compton and Grad re ‘ = 1 mn COtt ' Loftin, Trading as on ISSUES, NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | jlectric Company, IREDELL cco Defendants, a jirolina Motor Company 1. Were R. R, Com oFporation, ee pton and Gra business between July 1, 1950, and eet Te engaged in the electrical ; Vs. Plaintiff JUDGMENT Answer: no *8. E, L, Byrd — Defendant 2. What amount, if ’ any, does said partn H Answer: : ership owe the plaintiff? This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor J. He ‘inhi “Lenent,, Judge Presiding at the March 1952 Civil Term of the Superior Court of 3+ What amount if , any, does R ’ - Compton owe the plaintiff? Iredell County, R, p and it appearing to th ; that bove entitled action against the defendants on the 13th day of October, 1951; Rosser om | Said summons together with a copy of the complaint were served on L. ©, 4o ’ INTHE SUPERTOR. COURT a MARCH TERM, 1952 MARCH TERM, 1952 at Thursday, March 13th, 1952 Thursday, March 13th, 1952 i 1 ei | Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, as the true and lawful attomeyd the defendant, he 5087 Namie Gabriel vs Imperial Life Ins. Co ----- w-------- Cont inued : | $ i onl 5 5 @ r a CC . ’ i | | brs, E, L. Byrd, for the service of summons as provided in GS 1-105 of the lays No. 5125 Jackson R Campbell vs Cornelius A Campbell Se 1g) aie , . : : Admr ot Estate of Maudie Campbell, dec ------- ek hacia -Continued tH | of North Carolina; and that on the 19th day of October, 1951, the said L, ¢, eli wesaus HI) ai : or Ketchie vs Mollie Ketcnie -------- reser rn----- --CVontinued Hh H | Rosser, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles for the State oi North Carolina, notified No. 5137 DB Ne HH } : rn t ie a : ' | T Hu B r Pp t i i ell : ae ia . 7 No. 5023 llis - peer “a s . — aint Co vs . . mi | i the said Mrs. b, L. Byrd of the institution ol the above entitled suit and maije Wm D Fox T/A e l.ac OX Faint VO wnnwnn------~------- ontinue Te | aay. ey ent i ; . . r T ‘ n . : ” . 4 4 i : to her by registered mail a copy oi the summons and complaint in said action fio, 5157 A P Steadman vs D W Scott, L B Lyerly & L V Coggins - Continued 1] i iM , ae ae ett f : i : : are . -) . ue 1 H bait} as provided by the said Statute; and it also appearing to the court that the | Mo. 5164 Glenn Gilleland vs Mitchell Glenn Meseinore Infant ‘ | iH i ; J B Meseimore & Alma J Meseimore -----------------.-- Continued ie: iil i iefendant lirs. £, L, Byrd, was also served by the method provided in GS 1-]0 . me te Wh all ii ” F No. 5191 Shaver lotor Co Inc et al vs City ol Statesville ----UVontinued ‘ i | A, y Jd. & Kirkley, Sheriff ot Chesterfield County, State of South Carolina a ” 2 : 1 Pil! by — o . ’ | fio, 4409 Roy R Pearson vs George Walker -------------------- --Continued ei } | ; ’ : 1 : . oe : } \ i} Bra } fi and that the said J. «, Kirkley made an afiidavit to the effect tilat he had f m1 ‘ eae | - » Ho. 4585 Alice E Renegar vs Joun R Kenegar ------------------- Continued i. i et a Wy bi served Irs. &, L, Byrd; ana that within the time allowed by law the defendant 4 ae ee ala - eG | ' : ' | fo, 5058 Mary Liza Tt 2 vs Clyde itay iil 1 | mat Qay ye a r ir TL www wm wm wm wm we meee em OO ee eee me uU : y i hrs. %. Le Byrd, did not answer saia complaint; and it appearing to the court Randleman & Wi ~ — EN 1iet Gf : if 4 . si e e< ™ Ff . rn ° } feht : ' “3 : ' ‘ sic el i 3s 1y é 7 & W Knight--Continued ee Hi that a judgment by iefault and inquiry was entered y the Clerk of the Superior Mio. 5059 Juanita G Sain vs Clyde Ray Randleman & Wm E Kn . i ‘ | HH a ; HY \) i} | vourt of Iredell vounty on the 2lst of february, 1952, and the jury at this No, 5060 Billie G Miller vs Jlyde Ray Randleman & Wm E Knight-Continued 4 AH i; m . Pcie ‘Ete i i term having answered the issue as to la:.ace submitted to the jury as follows: dio, 5065 Fred w Hudson vs hoor Food Store Ince -------------- --Continued i 1 it * ; oe : .; ie wnat amount, if any, is tie plaintiff entitled to recover from the i ive) Pu H 4 4 ie defendant? ; Rit 1 AnSwer: 51,985.00 rE nf ! ’ a i : : » ’ a . ° | ) 1 “ow, tnerelfore, it is ordered, a ijudged, anu decreed that the plaintiff - } ay “or ror P +} iat law r + | | nave anu recover of ne aeien sant, MPS. Be le Byrd the sum of p1,085.00, a together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, Th 2+} law ¢ arn} this 13th day of warch, 1952, | J, H. Clement Judge Presiding, march 1952 Civil y | Term, Superior Vourt, Iredell County ; ane may ie ) ‘ ~< Wo. 5081 Lucinda Bellamy vs Alfonzo Stevenson ihhonnseneeou Continued by Vonsent ‘No. 5084 J Mv vchafer vs John A Miller & ” wife Elaine & Miller-Continued by 007 ay wil IN_THE SUPERIOR. COURT aH MARCH TERM, 1952 ean Thursday, March 13th, 1952 inal No. 5156 NorTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ei IREDELL COUNTY BsFORE THE CLERK | B.A. Myers T/A. I : Hi vers Tire Service, A ane 7 Plaintiff =| oi -vs- ! JUDGMENT se ae Hii Se it I c, W. Davis, | ed aa Hi df : Aah | Defendant ! ! iy i | bY a | i | ey = This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk, and it 1 i : h ime | el ; : ; uaa hi appearing to the vourt that the Plaintiff and Defendant have settled all % i i a Bayt \ matters between themselves and tne Defendant is not now indebted to the Be H| 4:1 ; i t i fi Plaintiff in any amount. | \ | | } " q Hi IT Is, THEREFOXE, decreed that this action be dismissed at cost or the nt | i Plaintiff. jeth ft Ht hil ah} ea if This the 12th day of Larch, 1952. Hi / | aah Hy Hh ve G, Smith 1 Hots Clerk Superior Court rey iW) wwe we we me me KK Ke he Ke KK KK K Th ih Hehe | Hil at { | t : / | io, 5238 i ! NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK ie Interstate Equipment Co. j vs. i NON-SUIT | ” ". 0. Flowe and ' i “. U. Kendricks . ! . | Plaintiff having expressed desire to take voluntary non-suit. Same is | . . dismissed at cost o: plaintiff, 1 } | March ll, 1952, i Cc, G, Smith 1 ore; Vs 1} ¥ Hi RNR RM KK KKK KK eK Ke ee ee a anon di a aa * ee "106 MANO. 5250A. CASE NO. 5589k _ DEPT. NO. 1 IN THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NiVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK THOMAS M. MeLEOD, ) Plaintiff, vs. HAZEL T. McLioD, } Defendant. DECREE OF Ui VORCE The above entitled cause coming on regularly for trial this day before the above entitled vourt, sitting without a jury, upon the Complaint of the plaintiff and the Answer oi the aefendant, and upon all the records and files herein, tne plaintiff appearing in person and though his attorney, S. GEORGE GILSON, ESQ., and the defendant appearing by and through her attarney, ELWIN C. LEAVITT, £3Q., the plaintiff introducing evidence in support oi the allegations oi his complaint, and the defendant not introducing evidence, and the Vourt being fully advised in the premises, and finding that theplaintiff is now and for more than six weeks prior to the commencement of this action and ever since has been an actual and bona fide resident ot the County of Clark, otate oi Nevada, and actually domiciled therein during all ot said period of tine, and that this vourt has jurisdiction over both of the parties hereto and of this cause, and that dl of the allegations contained in the plaintiff's vomplaint are true and that plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for in said Complaint, and Findings of fact, Vonclusions of Law, and Notice of Decision having been duly waived by stipulation in open vourt ’ NOW, THEREFOKE, by reason of the law in such cases made and provided, the Vourt deeming this a Proper case therefor, on motion ot S. GEORGE GILSON, &SQ., attorney for plaintiff, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED ANU DECREED that the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now existing between the plaintiff, THOMAS Mh. McLEOD, and the defendant, {AZEL T. MeLEO: HAZEL T. MeLEOD, be and the same are hereby dissolved and forever held for navel and th é . e said parties hereby released from all the obligations thereof and restored to the status of Single persons DONE IN OPEN COURT this 5th day of March, 1952, Harold 0, Taber unl istrict Judge 107 Filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for the County f Iredell, State of North Carolina on the 10th day of March, A. D, 1952 and 0 recorded in Book 30 of Minute Docket, Syperior Court on page 106 Public records of said vounty. Martha D. Parker Deputy Clerk, ee a ae ee a No, 5210 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPExIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY 5. T. Ingram, j Plaintiff " Vs. X JUDGHENT Walter *, Hudspeth, | Vefendant | This ca,Se coming on to be heard before the ‘ionorable LU, G, Smith clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for juurment against the defendant by default and inquiry; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and Summons issued in this action on the 29th day or December, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that said sumions, together with 4 copy of said complaint, were served on the defendant on the 1 day of January, 1952, And it further appearins to the court that no answer, demurrer or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file Pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired: It is therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover judgment against the defendant for such damages as a jury may award, and that inquiry of the amount of such damages be executed at the next Civil term o; the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, before a jury to determine th f j © amount o f Said damages, This 7th day of February, 1952. C. G, eh Clerk of Superior VCourt eR RM RR eR eK eK KK HK OK OH — scare woos ee ae oe sae eB 3 A= A K { , on, a \ Wy - | ae ey Ut Do No. 5168 NORTH CAXOLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL VOUNTY Carolina hotor Company a vorporation, Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. ree T lie Byrd Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable CU, G. Smith, Clerk of rnerior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment defendant by default and inquiry; earings to a verified complaint was filed and ieptoner 17 c . Uctober 13, 1951; that said summons together with a }, Rosser, Commissioner of s.otvor Vehicles, iefendant, Byrd, for tne tle laws of North Carolina; and that stoner of the Be Le action as provided by at the defendant i:.rse »& L, Byrd, was also served sheriff of 1-107 by J. E. Kirkley, and that the said d. be kirkley made an affidavit to the effect yrd; demurrer, or other A by the defendant and no extension d time to file ranted and that > time with’ = . i ed shat the time w n waich pleadings may be fi Led has expired; It is ordered. ad ’ ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover e 5 ent against the defendant for such damages as a jury may award, and that inquiry of the <; ae al 7 e amount of such damages be executed at the next civil term ol the superior Cour - Ir ' ‘ t of lredell County, before a jury to determine the amount of said damaces, This the 21 day oi Febr “ ly OL February, 1952, C. G, Smith vlerk Superior Court NO. 5125 soxtH CAROLINA IN THs SUPERIOR COURT FORE THE CLES TREDELL JOUNTY ae Jackson R. Campbell, Plaintiff -VS- 1 Administrator Sornelius A. vampbell, Admini of the Estate ot audie Campbell, deceased, { Defendant i This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Jourt that the Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to a settlement ol all matters and differences between themselves, and that the Defendant has agreed to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of “our liundred Fifty ($450.00) Vollars in full for all services rendered to the jeceased and for any funds advanced to and for her during her lite time; that there are no other debts due to tae Plaintiff for anything. IT IS, THERLPOKL, decreed that tne Plaintiff recover 0: vefendant tne sun of Four Hundred rifty ($450.00) Dollars as full and complete settlement between them, and that the vefendant be taxed with the cost o. this action. This March 14th, 1952. C. Ge. Smith ; fs m en i a eammsmmen Clerk superior vourt Land, Sowers & Avery attorney for the Plaintiff By Neil S, Sowers Attorney for the Vefendant a ee ibe ‘no. 5082 NOKTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Gin Company { vs { JUDGMENT Or NON-SUIT Alfonzo Stevenson } This cause coming on to be neard and being heard before the undersigned sLerk Syperior vourt of 4redell County and it appearing to the Court that this is an action in Claim and Delivery com..enced on June l15th, 1951; that no property was seized by the sheriff of lredell County on said writ: It is, therefore ordered anu adjudged that the action be and the same is hereby dismissed anu the plaintiff taxed with the cost. This the l4th day of larch, 1952. om J, umith vlerk ouperior vourt \ No. 5240 NORTH CAROLINA, . In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY Before the Clerk W. A, Sheaffer Pen Company, j Plaintiff, } Vs. I PINAL JUDGMENT Hoyle E. Setzer Jewelry Company, This cause coming on to be heard ’ Defendant. and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of } i of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 3lst day of March, 1 » 1952, on motion of Adams, Vearman and Winberry, Attaneys for the lai plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: ale That on Feb * February 25, 1952, the plaintirr filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitl i ed action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County: -2 ruary 25, 1952, to the sheriff of Iredell County, on and was returnable as provided by law. 111 -3< That the summons was served on the defendant by R. E. Perkins Deputy speriff of Iredell County, on February 27, 1952, by leaving with the defendant a copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint, “he That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. -5- That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized verified statement, marked "Exhibit A", was attached, and made a part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchases, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the transaction. -6= . That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized verified statement attacted to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise sho in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Four Hundred Dollars ($400.00), together with interest thereon at tie rate of Five percent per annum from November 1, 1950, umtil paid. IT Is, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Hoyle E, Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, the sum of Four Hundred Dollars ($400.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of five per cent per annum from November, 1, 1950, until paid, ‘gether with the cost of this action taxed by the Court. This the 31st day of March, 1952. C. G, Smith . Clerk of Superior Vourt of lredell Vounty. kee Ke RK KK KK He OH acy PE ee Se + eth a | Af i _ o' » ' } “— No. 5221 North Garolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Rama C. Bruner ( Vs. i Judgment of Non Suit Oscar Phillips : E This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that Plaintiff and defendant have adjusted and settled for all damages growing out of his personal injuries and that defendant will make satisfactory adjustment with tite insurance carrier for property damage, and that plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non-suit in this action. It is therefore, ordered and decreed, that this action be and the same is non-suited and dismissed, at the cost of Plaintiff. This April 3rd, 1952. C. G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court Agreed to R. A. Collier OF Counsel for Plainti? MRR KR KKK KR Oe Ok ok me ok me me ok oe No. 5243 AROLINA In the Superior Court NORTH © : before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. Rawleigh, Moses & Company, In- corporated, Plaintiff, Vs. w. D. Fox, Trading and cose Oe I | ! FINAL JUDGMENT i business as Mack Fox Paint j | Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 2nd day of April, 1952, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: ole That on March 1, 1952, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. a2e That surm.ons was issued from this Court on March 1, 1952, to the sheriff of Iredell county, and was returnable as provided by law. “> That the summons was served on the defendant by wayne C. Jenkins, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on March 3, 1952, by leaving with the defendant a copy of the Summons, together with a copy oi the complaint. oe That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answers, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. -5- That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized Verified Statement, marked "Exhibit A," was attached to, and made a part of the Complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the uate or the Purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits rising out of the transaction, -6= That the vourt finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized verified Statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A," that the defendant 1s Kt Be eo It apr é j r <r Te - . . +c Ppearing to the Court that thereafter from time to time, the defendant NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECRESD that the plaintiff, now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise a eee shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A," the sum of Three | It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have a Hundred aiid Five Dollars and Fifty-Six Cents ($305.56), together with interest ‘ and recover of the defendant judgment for the sum of $505.47, without interest, Bay a F 7 ; Bi thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from June 30, 1951, until paid, and that the defendant be taxed with the cost, i | IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIVERED, ORVERZD, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the (si ii lson Warlick ) b u 2 a g plaintiff recover of the defendant, W. D. Fox, trading and doing business ag ; STA’ + AMERICA wa | ht 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERI : a Mack fox Paint Company, the sum of Three liundred and Five Dollars and Fifty-gj, , Been Geneks SS: A | ; 3 stern District of North Carolina ib Cents ($305.56), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent ” He 7 > | per annum from June 30, 1951, until paid. ; I, Oscar L. MeLurd, Clerk of the United States vistrict Court in am for This the 2nd day of April, 1952. : the Western Vistrict of North Carolina, do hereby certify that the annexed and | C. G. Smith iled, in Statesvi - anit 4s a true and full copy of the original Judgment filed, in Statesville vlerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, soompeane . : f Ke RK KK KKK KK OK OH Civil No. 19l- United States of America -vs- Paul M. Cashion, on March 19, 1952 _ } now remaining among the records ot the said Court in my office. | | | IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and ‘No. 757-T. affixed the seal of the aforesaidCourt at Statesville, N.C. A 4 MM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PILED this 19th day ot March, A. U., 1952. Tio WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA MAR 19 1952 _——— ; | Y 7 - id i | statesville Civil No. 191 Clerk i y Clerk, U.S. Dist. Court By Annie Aderholdt ey a i (SEAL) Deputy vlerk. a UNITED STATES OF AieKICA ) Ant)! : ) hi : JUD i E a Hil: } SSOGMENT a ee ee ee ee ee iH PAUL hie CASHION ) al Route #2 ) No. 762-T, Mt ¢ / Vlevelam, North Curolina . | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FUR THE i Western District of North Carolina (HME Statesville Civil No. 183 ; H This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the regular Maren, 1952, mw - 7. —e se UNITED STAYES OF Al] me TE term of The United States Vistrict Court for the western District of North - rea | Carolins States th c We JUDGMENT | arosana, av statesville, North Carolina, before the Honorable Wilson Warlick, 0.) ie tribes | ; _ iommhae , *& M. MOTOR TRANSFER COMPANY d ] e d . . i ; Vr ls iA , i] vudge rreSiding, and it a pearing to the Vourt from the pleadings herein, state- Pal si ’ | iM nt o1' : bot Sville, North Varolina Hi or SS CONES OMe erigtnal documents, that the defendant became indebted to tl r au laintiff or a _ an nm 2 . : HN piaa 1 or about June 30, 1939 in the amount of $/65.38, which indebtedness This cause coming on to be heard befa'e the undersigned District Judge; | ah was secured b — ; 1) y a chattel mortgage from the defendant to the plaintiff dated And it appearing to the court that the Compaint herein was filed on Rh April 11, 1° am J Hii ' » 0799 and recorded in Book 152, page 564 of Chattel Mortgage Records “nuary 11, 1951; that verified answer of the defendant was duly filed herein i for Iredell C . 6.5) . | Cunty, N. C.; and, admitting all the allegations of the complaint; . a Hh delivered over tot ; , ; the - | oe ne plaintiff numerous articles of personal property which United vtates of America, have and recover of the defendant, G, & M. Motor : were to be sold by the pl; ‘oe . T ' It piaintiff and applied to the debt of the defendant; am, “ansfer Company, Inc., the sum of $150.05 together with interest thereon at the . appearin: further to the c r it id articl ne Vourt that the plaintiff sold and disposed of ate of 6% per annum from November 15, 1950 until paid, together with the costs ) os cies of personal prop te ; P perty at private sale at an in inadeouate and ineaui of this action, ) able price and that the amounts credited Thi . ed to the def ts from 8 2n . the proceeds of said 5 Senne 5 -aneeeoornett d day of April, 1952, ales were inadequate an d inequitable, Wilson Warlick ee 4” ae aan, Se (mmr rN GN EES lg OGRE IGE AE = = wtf) i} i pee Oy = SS i See i el Se = ey Sn a ee ea a a, | 4 : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Western Dictrict of N. C. | = I, Oscar L, McLurd, Clerk of the United States District Court in and for the Western District of North Carolina, do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing is a true and full copy of the original Judgment filed in Statesville Civil Action No. 183- United States of America -vs~- G. & M. Motor Transfer Company, Ine.= on April 2, 1952 now remaining among the records of the said Court in ny office. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the aforesaid Court at Statesville, N,0, this 4th day of April, A. ¥, 1952. Oscar L. McLurd Clerk By_ Annie Aderholdt Annie Aderholdt Deputy vlerk. ‘NO. 5239 NOR DAE i ORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY H. S. Nance, Plaintiff vs. Je i. Riley, a Set Defendant This cause Coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, vu ’ » vlerk Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon the — in the above entitled cause, and the defendant's motion filed herein, and it appearing to the Vourt that sumuons was issued in the above entitled — February 25, 1952, service was had upon the defendant on the 28th day of February 1952; that the action was for the recovery of certain personal property described in the plaintiff's affidavit described herein, some of which i was recovered from the defendant; that the plaintiff asked for an extension of time within which to file his complaint which application was grantet and such time extend ed to the 15th day of March, 1952, but that no complaint was 6 erved upon this defendant or filed with the C e Court; It is, therefor e, ord 409 ’ ered, adjudged and decreed upon motion of the defendant that the above entitled action be and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff js taxed with the costs of this action. this 9 day of April, 1952. i C. G, Smith T.C. Smith, Clerk Superior Court Iredell v ounty geese KHKE TEE ES mK OK KOK OK NO. 5245 ORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL COUNTY L. H. Anderson, Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vse $, E, Isenhour and L, 0. Pierce, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable ©. G,. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court ot Iredell vounty, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendants by default final; And it appearing to the court tnat a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 3rd day of March, 1952; And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on tne defendants on the 3rd & 5th days of March, 1952; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other plead~- ing has been filed by the defendants and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within waich pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint tiuat the cause of action consists of a judgment obtained by the plaintiff against the defendants in the March 1942 term of the Superior vourt of Ipedell Vounty, North “arolina, for the principal sum of $150.00 with interest and the said judguens issued thereupon amounts now to the sum of $240.00 plus the costs of the former action and the costs of this action; NOW, THEREFORE, IT is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, and each of them, tie Sum of $240.00, together “ith the costs of the former action terminated at the March, 1942 Term, and the Costs of this action. this 9th day of April, 1952. CC. & = ith Clerk superior Court eexneeesse ts oes 2 © * cd Sars No. 5265 North Carolin ” In the Superior Court Iredell County. J. T. Lambert ve. Judgment R. L. Campbell This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor ‘ f C. G, Smith, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell vounty, North Carolina; and it appearing that the parties have freely agreed upon, settled and compromised the matters in controversy between them, whereby the said R, L. Campbell, defendant, has paid to J. t, Lambert, the plaintiff the sum af $400.00 which the said R, L. vampbell nad collected for lirs. Ruth Sloan as a friend and at her request and direction from the plaintiff J. |. Lanbeth in settlement of a claim for personal injuries of said hrs. Ruth Sloan against the plaintiff; said personal injuries to the said hrs. Auth Sloan havine been caused by the plaintiff J. T. Lambert. Now, therefore, upon motion of the plaintiff, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing further by his action; that this jude 2 . : . : Judgment be, and is, a bar to the plaintiff recovering any amounts from the defendant on account of the matters alleged in the plaintiffs pleadings in the c . . \ ? ln ? T ’ cause; tnat the defendant, mu, be vampbell, pay the costs to be taxed by the Vlerk,. This the 15 day of April, 1952, v. G. Smith ait vierk Superior Court of Iredell vounty. We consent J. It. Lamberth ainti J. G. Lewis Attorney for Tlaintift &, L, Campbell Vefendant dugh G, hMjtchell Attorney for Jefendant re ePeeegaRRg aR MR x * 119 4 f lo. 5248 North Carolina. | In the Superior Court. Iredell County. J. He Rickert, Pjaintiff, JUDGMENT J, 8. Vernon and wife, Ruby i, Vernon, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Ulerk of the Superior Court and it appearing to the vourt that the Complaint was filed on Narch 8, 1952, and that Summons and Vomplaint were served on each of the defendants on March 10, 1952; that the action was brought on a note for ~1,542,50, with interest from February 26, 1952, and that said note was secured by a Uhattel hortgage for which a Writ of vlaim and Delivery was issued for the property and that upon the serving of the writ, Summons and Complaint, the oneriff of Iredell County took into his possession one wnite-face cow, one white hor, one 1940 ton and a half rord Truck, one share oi stock in the vountry vlub, one Poland China sow, one 19" Halicrafter Television, 4 hams, 4 shoulders and 4 middlings as meat from hogs covered by the Chattel Mortgage; It further appearing to the Vourt tnat the time for answering or otherwise pleading in the cause has expired and no pleadings have been tiled herein; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover or the defendants, and each oi them, the sum of 91,542.50 with interest fron February 28, 1952, until paid. This judgment is declared a general lien on all the property owned by the defendants, Or either ot them, and is a specific lien upon the property seized oy the sheriff and now held by the plaintiff, subject to the direction of this vourt, it is further ordered that the Sheriff shall seize such additional roperty which may be subject to execution belonging to the defendants, or either of them, until he has sufficient property or equity cvherein, to satisfy the Judgment of the plaintiff and the sheriff is directed as an oificer of this vourt, 60 sell such property as he has now seized or may hereafter seize, at public “Wtion in satisfaction of the plaintiff's judgment. The defendants are taxed with the costs of this action and any costs ‘neidental to the Sale of the property. This April 16th, 1952. CG. G ith Tierk Superior vourt eX ERR KR RK KKH KKK HK KH HH OH emer ) | i i ben Bh Wilt i i | i | JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Iredell County Board of Education | Spring Term, 1952 vs. i No. 379 Iredell County, 1 Zeb V. K. Dickson This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this court is of opinion that there is no error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court, It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of the vourt, as delivered by the Honorable Samuel J. Ervin, Jr., Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED And it is considered and adjudged further, that the Plaintiff do pay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, to wit, the sum of Fourteen and 60/100 dollars ($14.60), and execution issue therefor. A TRUE COPY Adrian J. Newton (SEAL) Clerk of the oupreme Court. NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY L. W. Westmoreland and Graham Westmorel 1 and T/A Mooresville Roofing and Heating Company Plaintiffs JUDGMENT Morrison-Lael Fixture Corporation ) ) vs ) ) Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final: ’ And it a ppearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 26th day of March 1952; ’ ’ And it f urther appearing to the court that said summons together with 4 copy of said py Complaint were served on the defendant on the 3rd day of April, 195% And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other Pp e een filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file P ead : has been ranted an i & and that the time in which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Two Hundred Sixteen and 80/100 dollars ($216.80) with interest thereon from the 5th day of September, 1950; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the plaintiff nave and recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred Sixteen and 80/100 dollars, with interest thereon from the 5th day of September, 1950, and the costs of this Action. This 7th day of May, 1952. C. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court eK KP KK KR KK KK KK RK kK KO NO. 5272 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Syperior Court IREDELL COUNTY. before the Clerk Marietta Paint & Color Company, Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT Norrison-Lael Fixture Corporation, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 16th day of May, 1952, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default, final, and it appearing to the vourt; ale That on April 15, 1952, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. ~2= That summons was issued from this Court on April 15, 1952, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. -3- That the summons was served on the defendant by Bunch Redmond, Deputy Sherif of Iredell County, on April 17, 1952, by leaving with the defendant a C0 PY of the Summons, together with a copy of the complaint. -L- That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, am the time al lowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demy "rer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. BS ae \ 4 NA ooo Xu U0 ee oe 9+ as b | — N ao rs f ae Wey WW ct it -> Tha; the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor: that an itemized statement, marked "Exhibit A", was attached to, and made a part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all dbits and credits arising out of the transaction. aba That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint am the itemized verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Doliars and Twenty vents ($245.20), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from February 7, 1952, umil paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECRESD that tne plaintif! recover of the defendant, Morrison-Lael Fixture Corporation, the sum ol Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars and twenty cents ($245.20), together with interest t hereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from February 7, 1952 until paid, together with the cost of this action taxed by the Court. This the 16th day of May, 1952. C. G, Smith ———— Cierk of Superior Vourt of Iredell County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 19th, 1952 yoRTH CAROLINA, TREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. ©, on the 19th day of May, 1952, at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. when and where His Honor J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, 1952, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicetor and Prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J.C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and opened Court by order of tne v ourt. J. C. Rumple, Hign Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for the May Term, 1952, First Week, to-wit: WR Wallace Glenn Holland W D Campbell Clifford C Alexander C L Edmiston Bruce R Kennerly James C Rogers W C Austin J C Ford ML Starnes MC James Mrs Mary C Smith Minor A Lentz Nathan McElwee a Ulyde P Khyne NE ai sy > emcee laude H Pharr JL Ellis N S Mason R D Oliphant James F Harmon A J Hoover Harold R Wilson irs C E Raynal Walter J Young David SWilson C A Bolick ” Frank Redmond R J Weisner 0 W Houston A Banks Culp ML Starnes and J L Ellis were excused by Doctor's Certificates. Claude H Pharr, Mrs C E Raynal and Mrs Mary GC Smith were execused by the vourt. MC James was not returned. A. Banks Culp was excused until the August Term, 1952 Superior Vourt. A. J, Hoover was excused by Statute. J. B, Goforth was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. The following were sworn as talesman jurors for the week; Foy Deal S E Little E E Johnson 1 st a] “= ‘ i = rd P ‘a 4 ; a io) TE . e Tinen iar. a ween een Pe lh i ale FT RT Got No. 1103 State vs Guy Ramsey ilo. 1205 State vs Nathan Patterson \No ° 1345 state vs Mary Saunders Wo. 1354 State vs Benjamin Jackson [hreatte, d No. 1403 State vs Clement P Gaither, dr \No. 1509 State vs Toby Hyde Wo. 1549 State vs William Leroy Smith WNOe 1558 state vs Lottie kell Cloud WO. 1572 strate vs Bud Little, alias Marshall Little Wo. 1599 State vs George « Ureson \No. 1L6OOL State vs Joseph rulton Woods Wo. 1605 State vs G A Benfield \ No * 1606 State vs Joseph Fulton Woods IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK <---~ MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 19th, 1952 { FALSE PRETENSE Alias Capias j BASTARDY Continued Under-Yortiet Order. POSSESS LIQUOR Alias Capias j ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under Former Order. r ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WeAPON It is ordered by tne vourt that a capias be issued for tne defendant. LARUENY Alias Vapias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WLAPON Alias Capias LARVENY Alias Capias BREAKING ks EN BERING Alias Capias ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Gontinued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Capias Oe 1616 State vs j 0 Gray fio, 1628 State vs Clayton Hagans No. 16k State vs Troy Fesperman Ho. 1648 State vs Ernest Alexander fio. 1660 State vs P W Byers No. 1573 State vs Merriman Keller Nos. 1630 & 1631 State vs Otho Herman Stutts Mos, 1641 & 1642 orate vs Weldon Campbell Willard Chambers No, 1650 state vs Hobert Redman ‘0 ° 16 56 state vs Ben Wilhelm Nos 1669 & 1670 state vs Marvin © Blackwelder lio, 1672 “tate YS William thompson No, 167 State , vs Tom Leroy Summers IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 19th, 1952 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Fa and Capias. LARCENY defendant. F ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Sci Fa and Vapias. ASSAULT ON OrrICER Sci Fa and Capias. ABANDON & NON=-SUPPORT Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO CObu.1T RAPE Nol Pros With Leave. SPEEDING & RECKLBSS DRIVING Continued for tne Defendant. DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY Continued for the Defendant. B i GAMY Nol Pros With Leave. EMBEZZLEMENT ; Continued for the Defendant. EMBEZZLEMENT Continued by consent. CARNALLY KNOW & ABUSE A CHILD Continued for the Defendant. DRIVING DRUNK Sci Fa and Capias. Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei It is ordered that a capias be issued for the Defendant called atid failed. Judgment Nisi Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 19th, 1952 RECKLESS DRIVING Continued for the Defendant, JNo. 1682 State vs Bobby Gray Miller | hy vs Bidful Privette m 1684 J POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR _ Continued for the defendant, Maude Lewis mh \ a yore AID & ABETT IN RECKLESS DRIVING a Vn I Continued for the defendant, Ah Glenn Albert Randleman i 7“: 20? | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON 4 ta Judgment Complied With. | Johnnie Moten i me) = \No. 161 | re 3 1 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY | Judgment vomplied with. I "I it State } vs Homer A Nantz ASSAULT ON FEMALE LVontinued under former order. Wo. 1715 State BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY = A True bill Sam Alexander \No. 1716 es State 1 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY bo I A True Bill Sam Alexander \No. 1713 ee | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY vs I A True ill Oscar hoose hI No. 1721 i State BREAKING, BNTSRI ‘ E | ta | A Tenge ENTERING & LARCENY Troy Levan i 4 Wo. 1709 iy 471 @b i| State FALSE REGISTRATION AUTOMOBILE A True Johnny William Nance - Wee 1695 tate snaAKING & ENTERING Charles James Gantt | a Nos. 1705 & 1707 State ca "Te ENTERING & LARCENY Bub Sturgis, Jr. a Floyd Herndon a ii" flos. 170k, 1708 & 1706 State vs Bub Sturgis, Jr Paul Jackson Patterson Floyd Herndon Ro. 1700 State vs Ralph V Shumaker No. 1645 State vs Lloyd H Hoover Weli-51 No. 1667 State vs Lee McLain W=hi-27 flo. 1678 State vs Graham Jackson White No, 1677 State vs “ahaa Jackson White IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 19th, 1952 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARVENY A True Bill ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL A True Bill DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney, Hugh G. Mitchell, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Vounty for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of tne State Highway and Public Works vommission. Capias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pays the cost of this action and pay a fine of $100.00; Tnat he surrender his operator's license to the Clerk Superior Court to be sent to the Department of motor Vehicles, Highway Safety Division, Raleigh, N. 0.; and that he not operate a motor vehicle for a period of Twelve (12) Months. Rt 6, Statesville, N. U, LN-519951. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to possessing non-tax paid liquor. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell vounty for a period of FOUR (4) ».ONTHS assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Capias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pay the cost of tnis action and pay a fine of $25.00; and that he violate of Two (2) Years. Defendant is to pay one-half the cost hay 23 and the remainder on May 30th, 1952. DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED Nol Pros With Leave. — DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorneys, John Lewis and Macon M Simons, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and Empanelled. At the close of State's evidence, the defendant to operating a motor vehic e of some narcotic, which plea the State accepts. JUDGMENT of the Court is that_the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Capias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pay the cost of this action and pay a fine of $200.00; and that he not operate a motor vehicle for a period of Twelve (12) Months. no prohibition law of the State of N. C. for a period through his attorneys enters a plea of Nolo Contendere le while under the influence ‘No. 1643 State vs Luther Franklin White We-)i- YNo. 1720 State vs Robert Ardis \tho. 1719 State vs Robert Ardis Wo. 1666 State vs James Wilford Vash W-18 Wo. 1692, 1693 & 1694, State vs Edward Summers Roy Barkley Troy Yorsyth Wo. 1676 State vs Elijah Green IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 19th, 1952 AID & ABETT IN DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney, John G enters a plea of Not Guilty. : aul, Jury Sworn and Empanelled,. Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL A True Bill. MURDER The Grand Jury returns in open Court ina body (seventeen present) a True Bill of Indictment charging the defendant, Robert Ardis, with the Capital offense of Murder in words and figures as follows: "State of North Carolina Superior Co Iredell County , 352 May Term, 1952 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESB: That Robert Ardis late of the County of Iredell, on the 14th day of Aorii, A. Dd. 1952, with force and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, wilfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder one Clyde M. Fox contrary to the fom of the statute in such case made and provided, an against the peace and dignity of tne State. Zeb A. Morris Solicitor. "No. 1719 State vs Robert Ardis INDICTMENT MURDER Witness Reba Fox WB Fox x “rs Nellie Thornburg x Tr 0Se marked x sworn by the undersigned foreman, and examined b ec j A TRUE SILL. the Grand Jury, and this bill fou Walter E, Miller Foreman of the Grand Jury: SPEEDING Defendant throu h ' his att N M Simons enters a plea of Not Mis, — ury Sworn and Empanelled. ury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. EMBEZZLEMENT A True Bill LARCENY OF AUTOMOBIi / M0 A True 8411 nile IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May }9th, 1952 No. 1683 DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to Drivin — under the influence of some wriskhe. , Louis Mansfidd Parks JUDGMENT of the Vourt is that the defendant W-M-h.2 be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State “ey and Public Works Vommission, apias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pay the cost of this action; pay a fine of $105.00; and that he not operate a motor vehicle in this State for a p@wiod of Twelve (12) Months. jNo. 1721 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY State Defendant enters a plea of Guilty as charged. vs JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined Troy Levan in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period W-M- of ONE (1) YEAR, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, ‘No. 1717 |} MURDER State The Grand Jury returns in open Vourt in a body vs (Eighteen Present) a True Bill of Indictment charging Johnny Willie Smith the defendant, Johnny Willie Smith, with the capital offense of Murder in words and figures as follows: "State of North Carolina Iredell County Superior Vourt May Term, 1952 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: that Johnny Willie Smith late of the County of Iredell, on the 5th day of April, A. UD. 1952, with torce and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, weet ert? feloniously, and of his malice aforethought, did kil and murder one John Ed Cowan contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. Zeb A. Morris solicitor. "1717 STATE vs Johnny Willie Smith —E—l MURDER Witness Ruby Shuford x Will Jetton Jerry Lee Graham Virginia Shuford Letha Mae Shuford Eddie Lee Shuford Ray Von Shuford x Those marked x sworn by the undersigned corenete. ined before the Grand Jur and this sr . A TRUE BELL. Walter E, miller Foreman of the Grand Jury. Nio. 1717 State vs Johnny Willie Smith U-22 \No. 1662 State vs Stowe Henry Chapman W=23 ‘No. 5269 Edward C. Peacock vs Maxine Williams Peacock NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Edward C. Peacock, Plaintiff -VS- Maxine Williams Peacock, Defendant l. Were the plaintiff Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintirr for two years next preceding the commence Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintirr immediately preceding the co Answer: Yes and defendant been a resident of I ommencement of this Action? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WE&K ---- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 19th, 1952 MURDER The Solicitor in open Court states that he will not ask for a verdict of Murder in First Degree, but for a verdict of Guilty of Murder in Second Degree or verdict of Guilty of Manslaughter, as the evidence warrants. Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. At the Close of the State's evidence, the defendant through his attomey, Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of Guilty to manslaughter, which plea the State accepts, MANSLAUGHTER Defendant through his attorney, Mr. Raper Jonas, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere to Involuntary Manslaughter. JULDGHENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a Period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Vapias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pays the cost of this action and that he remain a law abiding citizen for Two (2) Years. DIVORCE Jury sworn and empenelled as follows: J. C. Ford, Clyde P. Rhyne, N. S, Mason, Walter Je Young, W, Frank Redmond, Glenn Holland, Nathan McElwee, Ws Re Wallace, R. J, Weisner, Foy Deal, S. E. Little, and E, E, Johnson. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? lived separate and apart from each other ment of this action? redell County, \. CU. for six months IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 19th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA May Term, 1952 IREDELL COUNTY C, Peacock Edward Plaint iff | -vs- | I JUDGMENT Williams Peacock, Maxine Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of marriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. J. H. Clement ~ Judge Presiding. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, May 20th, 1952 at 9:30 O'clock A, M, No. 1717 State wey vs i Johnny Willie Smith C-22 Nos. 1704, 1708 & | 1706 State Wh vs beta Bub Sturgis, Jr. C-21 Paul Jackson Patterson, U- Floyd Herndon, C- \Nos. 1705 & 1707 State vs Bub Sturgis, Jr Floyd Herndon | | No. 1716 Wii) State qi vs i) Sam Alexander W-29 te 1 heyy Wo. 1713 4) A State ks vs Oscar Moos@ We / IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning ’ May 20th, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A, M. MANSLAUGHTER JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the State Prison at Raleigh, for a Term of not less than Fifteen nor more than Twenty Years. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY In 1704, as to Bub Sturgis, Jr., defendant enters a plea of Guilty. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of THREE (3) YEARS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public works Commission. In 1708, as to Paul Jackson Patterson, Defendant enter a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and Empanelled, and returns a verdict of Guilty as charged, JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Uommon Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWO (2) YEARS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, In 1706, as to Floyd Herndon, defendant enters a plea of Nolo Vontendere through his attorney, Grant Bolmer, JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of THREE (3) YEARS, azgigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, BREAKING ENTERING AND LARCENY In 1705, Defendant, Bub Sturgis, Jr., enters a plea of Guilty. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell VCounty for @ period of THREE (3) YEARS, assigned to wark on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is to run concurrent with sentence in #1704. : In 1707, Defendant, Floyd Herndon, enters a plea iolo vontendere, through his attorney, Grant Bolmer. JUDGNENT of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Vommon Jail of Iredell County for 4 a of THREE (3) YEARS, assigned to work on the Public worn the supervision of the State Highway rks Commission. This sentence is to run Concurrent with sentence in #1706. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY efendant through his attorney, Hugh McAuley, ent Jubeney lea of Guilty as charged, ot the Court is that the defendant be conf ; n & period - ‘he Common Jail of Iredell County for THREE (3) YEARS d ork on the roads under t » assigned to w peer and Public Works ae Supervision of the State Hig mmission, BREAKING, ENTERIN ) j Defendant ; ING AND LARCENY Grant ——" a plea of Guilty, though’ his attornel: jatd in the Common Jail oft is that the defendant be conf Tredell County for a perio © supervision’ ee ened to work oa the roads = Commission, of the S ate Highway and Public W No. 1715 State vs Sam Alexander We29 No. 1714 State vs Oscar Moose iNo. 1519 State vs Luther "Luke" Kimmer Mio, 1520 State vs Will Mathis, alias Will jHatbews veo oe dio. 1690 State vs Everette Adams Cw ¥7 Wo, 167] State _ v8 overette Adans V@ 4; tio, 1702 State vs James Pay) Brewer No. 1711 State vs tates Sgmuel White J» SJ No. 16 State” vs Willian Parsons IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 é Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Defendant through his attorney, Hugh McAuley, enters a plea of Guilty. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of ONE (1) YEAR, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is to go , i into effect at the expiration of the sentence imposed aa in #1716 in which defendant entered a plea of Guilty i | i of Housebreaking and larceny at the May Term Superior Hie Court, 1952 and was sentenced to serve a term of Th Three (3) Years on the roads. ah f ! | DRUNK & DISORDERLY ; Defendant, through his attorney, Grant Bolmer, ee enters a plea of Guilty. mit JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be i 4 | {3 Ace confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for eh il a period of THIRTY (30) DAYS, assigned to work on we the roads under the supervision of the State Highway ae } and Public Works Commission. This sentence is to run De concurrent with the sentence in #1713. Ae | ay BREAKING, ENTERING, ANU LARCENY ii Nol Pros With Leave. ih a | a BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY ; hi Defendant, through his attarney, John Lewis, enters a plea of Guilty to rorcible Trespassimg. 4 JUDGMENT of the Vourt is that the defendant pay i the Cost oi this action. LARCzNY oes Defendant enters a plea of Guilty as charged. JUDGMENT of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWO (2) YEARS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty as charged. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWO (2) YEARS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is to run concurrent with the sentence in #1690. DRUNK & DISORDERLY ; On recommendation of Officer, State takes a Nol Pros With Leave. SPEEDING Defendant through ae eee eeet Dick Battley, lea of Nolo Contendere. on TUDGMEN of the Court is that the defendant pay the Cost of this action. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WiAPON Nol Pros With Leave JNo. 1701 State vs C. T. Shinn iNo. 1691 State vs Velma Moose Vo. 1703 State vs Lewis S Coggins Wo. 1712 State vs William Jones W- No. 1703 State vs aa S. Coggins Wo. 1205 State vs Nathan Patterson Wo. 1676 State vs Elijah Green ~ sNo. 1718 State vs David Caldwell IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 VIOLATION OF "QFF PREMISES LICENSE" Defendant called and failed. Judgm Sei Fa and Capias. oo TRESPASSING A True Bill HIT & RUN A True Bill RECKLESS DRIVING : Vefendant through his Attorney, Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and Empanelled. _ Jury returned a verdict of Guilty to Reckless Driving. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, It is ordered that the probation judgment be, and the same is hereby revoked and the sentence neretotore suspended be put into effect. This sentence to run concurrent with the Sentence in #1712. HIT & RUN Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and Empanelled. Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged. JUDGHZNT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Vounty for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of ti vtate Highway and Public Works Commission. _ Capias not to issue to put the mad sentence into effect provided the defendant pays the cost of this action and pays into the Office of the vlerk of Superior Court $20.00 for the benefit of Paul brown, SASTARDY . > is ordered that a capias be issued for the aor emaant It is further ordered that the efendant give a justified bond in the sum of $100.00 for his a 2 ° earance at the July, 195 Term of Superior ers. " LARCENY OF AUTOMOBILE Defendant enters a plea of Guilty as charged: senriats of the Court is that the Xefendant be for ined in the Common Jail of Iredell County oa period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS assign State i the roads under the supervision of the - ighway and Public Works Commission. his sentence is t © run concurrent with the Sentence he is now Serving. iit HANDLING POISONOUS D Nol Pros With tear No. 1675 State vs Everette Adams ¢ NO. 1673 State vs James Edgar Rankin 4io. 1709 State vs Johnny William Nance Mo. 1360 State vs Ervin Feimster “io. 1345 State vs Mary Saunders No. 1572 State vs bud Little alias Marshall Little MBBOUEOR Oe L606 * JEEeRA HUWKA WabwEK No. 1691 State vs = Moose io, 1558 State vs Lottie Bell Cloud No. 16 State” vs William Parsons lo, 16 State” vs Tom Lero y S ta We 52 ummers FIRST WEEK ---- MAY TERM Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 i. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1952 FORNICATION AND ADULTERY Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and Empanelled, After hearing the evidence, the Court orders the case dismissed, DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorneys, Dick Battley and John Lewis, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and Empanelled. After hearing the evidence, the Court orders the case dismissed, FALSE R&GISTRATION AUTOMOBILE Nol Pros With Leave. SCI FA ON BOND It is ordered that the judgment be made absolute on the bond to be discharged upon payment of the Cost. SCI FA OW BOND IT is ordered that the judgment be made absolute on the bond to be discharged upon payment of the Cost. SCI FA ON BOND It is ordered that the judgment be made absolute on the bond to be discharged upon payment of the Lost of Sci Fa. SU IPAXOMORUND ER Si IER BK XE DOS HOEK RO BX DOE AD SED WDE SN TRESPASSING Defendant through her attorney, Pete Avery, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury Sworn and Empanelled. Jury returmed a verdict of Not Guilty. SCI FA ON BOND It is ordered that the Sci Fa on Bond be continued until next Term of Vourt. SCI FA ON BOND It is ordered that the judgment be made absoiute on the bond to be discharged upon payment of the cost of Sei Fa. DRIVING DRUNK ‘ ate Defendant enters a plea o ° JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads. under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Capias not to issue to put the road sentence ease effect provided the defendant pays the cost * action; a fine of $100.00; that he surrender . - if operator's license to the Clerk Superior Cow as sent to the Department of Motor Vehicles, Seed re e Division, Raleigh, N. C.; and that he not oper oter Vehicle for a period of een ve (12) Months. — Ey wrk eS ae — a HI ' 4 4 Sa - ee a tg = He <> = Fe ry aa Pao S ‘STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 No. 1695 BREAKING & ENTERING State Defendant through his attorney, Hugh Mitchell v8 enters a plea of Guilty to Forcible Trespass, ’ Charles James Gantt JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be C confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highwa and Public Works Commission. Y Capias not to issue to put the road sentence into effect provided the defendant pays the cost of this action and that he remains a law abiding citizen for a period of Two (2) Years. Defendant is given until the August Term, 1952 Superior Court to pay the Cost. COUNTY OF IREDELL IN THE SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DOCKET 80S. 1598 — See ee — Vs ORDER REVOKING PROBATION ODELL MORRISON, JR. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard at the May term of the aforesaid Court, Hon. J. H, Clement, Judge Preiding, and It APPEARING to the Court that the defendant, Odell Morrison, Jr., at the May, 1950 Term of the aforesaid Court entered a plea of guilty, to the crime of b.E. & L & R and was sentenced to Jail, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission of North Carolina for a period of 12 months which sentence was suspended and the defendant placed on probation for a period of 3 years under the general conditions as set forth in the probation judgment. IT NOW APPEARING to the vourt, and the Court finding as a fact upon affirmative testimony of the Probation Officer that the defendant has violated the terms and conditions l. of the probation judgment as follows: That on or about June 1, 1951 the defendant left the State of North Carolina without written permission of the probation officer. (This being in violation of the condition of probation that he remain within a specified are@ and shall not change his place of residence without written consent of the probation officer. 2. A i t this time a warrant is Outstanding in Iredell County charging abandonment and non-support, (this being in violation with the conditions of ti probation that he support his dependents and violate no laws of this State.) IT Is rv ute 15 ~ + : ‘ » THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the probation judene and th i be, © same is hereby revoked and the sentence of 12 months heretofore suspended be put into effect, This the 20th day of May, 1952. J. H, Clement JUDGE PRESIDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 fo. 1227 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL DOCKET NO. 1227 state of North Carolina -vs- Roby L. Connor, Defendant WHEREAS at the lay 23, 1949 Term of Iredell County Superior Court being held in the City of Statesville, North Carolina , before the Honorable George A, Shuford, Judge Presiding, and above named defendant, Roby L, Connor, entered a plea of guilty to the crime of Larceny, and WHEREAS it was the Judgment of the Vourt that the defendant be sentenced to jail, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission of North Carolina for a period of ‘'welve honths, which sentence was suspended, and the defendant placed on probation for a period of Three ‘ears under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its Officers with such conditions of probation being imposed as are set forth by Statute, and WHEREAS it is now brought to the attention of the Court by a duly authorized Probation Officer who is a sworn officer of the Vourt that the said defendant, doby L. Connor, has wilfully violated the terms and conditions of the probation Judgment as shown by the fact that 1. Subject is serving a sentence of one year for non-support. 2. Subject has not reported since September, 1951. IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that a capias be issued by tne Clerk of this Court for the above named defendant, that he may be taken and returned to the Court for a hearing as to his guilt or innocence of violating the orders of the Court, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that when the defendant be found, the Sheriff or othe: duly authorized law enforcement officer of tnis City or County shall return the lefendant to Statesville and shall produce him in Court for the hearing above Mentioned, This the 20 day of May, 1952. J. H. Clement “JUDGE PRESIDING — Set ee a a . eae SS iieetspr acosesieeaneeamemtien IN THE SUPERIOR COURT We Yi FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 iI Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 Whi IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 MURDER Hi } , 1665 GRAND JURY REPORT | No Continued for the defendant. State ; May Term, }952 iemunder Hughey Montgomery The Grand Jury found True Bills of Indictment on all cases that were passed on No.1661 MANSLAUGHTER State Continued for the Defendant. vs Bessie Fair that were presented by the Solicitor. We recommend that all witnesses to appear before the Grand Jury be summoned to be present the first day of Vourt in order hi for the Grand Jury to expedite their work. Adit | No. 1681 MANSLAUGHTER i | Committees were appointed to inspect the following county Properties: | State Continued for the Defendant. a) County Jail Wade Donald Yow ePutr| I A Committee inspecting the County Jail found a total of ten white prisoners io. 1700 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL O. State Continued for the Defendant. and thirteen negro prisoners all male, well taken care of. We found the Jail vs | clean and in good repair. Ralph V Shumaker } | : County Home Wo. 1710 POSSESS & TRANSPORT UNTAX PAID LIQUOR 7 f {: State Continued for the Defendant. A Committee visited the County Home and found same to be in good order, clean vs Donald Wade Yow | and very sanitary. Several of the rooms have been painted and new drapes at the ‘No. 1719 MANS LAUGHTER Hy re ae windows. They had the same number of patients as when we visited them in Jamuary State Continued for the Defendant. of this year, fifteen white women, fifteen white men, nine colored women, two nn Anite iW colored men. a Hh ‘ } DEA WEA \ WILT TEN ) KILL bi County Court House NQe 4720 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KI } hit - Continued for the Defendant. Robert Ardis | A Committee inspected the County Court House and recommend that work of met remodeling Tax Vollector's Office which will provide more space for records, be i) ‘No. 1686 ) DRIVING DRUNK : Started as soon as possible; that inside painting be done, especially in Clerk's State 0 Continued 7 ! r 4 } : 7 ’ " if Office, County Library, Sheriff's Office and halls, Some of the rooms Flay Emery Dockery | Hh recommended. in January have been painted. The committee talked to the Clerk of i HT Cubtend See ot) a dee ee 1687 | POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR i Ht records of Administrators, Executors, and Guardians to be | = Cont inued | . . | in order. The Justice of Peace records were up to date. Register of Deeds Vave Jackson Ha i records were well kept, | ati mt ieee POSSESS NON=TAX PAID LIQUOR | a i Prison Camp ve Continued Hi W Mrs Ed T ) | Bun e checked the ; na A tT ) 1h i ed the prison camp and found everything in good condition. ape | TWH ; , itt 11) Walter E, Miller No. 1689 DRIVING DRUNK ahi qh | | foreman — Continued | tt “lenn L Setzer i t A ad ‘No, en | i" EMBEZZLEMENT | ) vs Continued Wie ‘dward Sunners i Mo. 16 Sate” EMBEZZLEMENT vs Continued Roy Barkley rs . RM SFR SE \iaepatthaiets! "7 ewe INo. 1694 State vs Troy Forsyth No. 1696 State vs William Hopkins State vs James Currence No. 1646 State vs Lloyd Hoover \No. 1699 State vs Robert Ford Robinson This Honorable Co urt t akes a recess until Monday Morning, May 26th 1952 at 10:00 o'clock, A. MN, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Tuesday, May 20th, 1952 EMBEZZLEMENT Continued BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Continued BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Continued DRIVING DRUNK Continued DRIVING DRUNK Continued yoRTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, vay 26th, 1952, at 1 0:00 otclock, with Honorable J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, 1952, present and presiding. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this the Second Week of the jbadicy Term, 1952, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: ¢, B. Gantt H, C. Heath Francis W, Troutman Grady M. Freeze Paul Moore Clarence R, Lippard R. J. Atwell Glenn R, Pope H, B, Wallace G. D, Ward W. L. Combs J. O. Hunter W. P. Harris Be. R. Barkley Fred P. Morrison E. J. Rankin Clint E.fox C. T. vhapman B. P. Kistler C. R. King M. M. Gaither Oe Ba Troutman Uhamberlain - Compton horton McAlister London W. Angley Sherrill Upright . Combs and K. A. Morton were out of the County. Kistler was excused by Doctor's Certificate. Chamberlain was not returned. The following men constitute what shall hereafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: H. C, Heath, Francis W. Troutman, Gray “. Freeze, vlarence K.Lippard, R. J. Atwell, Glenn i. Pope, H. B. Wallace, G. D, Ward, Js 0, Hunter, 8B. R. Barkley, Fred P. Morrison and M. U, Troutman. 0, 5242 George Taylo ad OTe Biveree Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled ™ answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Ruby Taylor State of North Carolina In Superior Court vounty of Iredell Seorge Taylor -— ISSUES tuby Taylor I 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer, Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT " IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 3 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fra | No. £297/ each other next preceding the commencement of this action? q tiny Morton Burgess { DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled | oii: ws } vs answers the issues submitted to it as follows: SEITE ID ND 1! J pomet LIER GEA: ame a) Ue a 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, N. C. for six ; francis L Burgess months next immediately preceding the commencement of this action? : NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Answer. Yes [ CABARRUS COUNTY MORTON BURGESS roy PLAINTIFF State of North Carolina » es In Superior Court ” ANCIS L. BURGESS " DEFENDANT County of Iredell og . George Taylor -Vs- JUDGMENT. Ruby Taylor Were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer yes This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding ze : £ i ne S olina the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carol So 2 os i i a “ H a Peet woe eae . . } eding the institution of this the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, continuously, for more than six months next prece é as appears in the record: x — ee action, as alleged in the complaint. ee nea ne aS ‘ 2 BETIS ee SE: ey SS a : a - 4 = - = : —= — ————- = = es cae =“ > ——— LO a eS a ™ ¥ 5 a nm Gd er ee: rs me " : = oe IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, Considered and adjudged that the bonds of Answer __yes___ tea at re ae teen ee Sandie See ST matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the saze de ae + ; ao ime 4 : te and apart for a period of are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorte Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separa Pp from the defendant. were 3 more than two years continuously next preceeding tne institution of this action, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action. as alleged in the complaint? a Len 176 Answer Yes J. H, Clement NORTH Cu THE SUPERIOR COURT Judge Presiding pl _— TINY MORTON BURGESS PLAINTIFF Teen Ue om vs JUDGMENT FRANCIS L, BURGESS DEFENDANT This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned judge and a jury at the term above mentioned and being heard, and the jury having returned a verdict to the answers to issues set out in the record, finding that the Plaintiff and the defendant were married as alleged in the complaint; and that the plaintirr has been a resident of the State of North Carolina continhously ‘or more than six months next preceeding the institution of this action; and that iod ‘he plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart continuously for 4 per IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ~-- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 of more than two years next preceeding the institution od this action, as North Carolina In the Superior Court Raymond kk. soas Vefendant alleged in the complaint. Iredell County May term, 1952 It is, therefore, on motion of Ernest R, Alexander, Attorney for the Janett Arney boas i Plaintiff plaintiff, be ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be ; rt ; vs JUUGMENT mA and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. : ‘ blah . ond R. Boas ti Let the plaintiff pay the costs. 4 _— Defendant 1 Brea This 26th day of May, 1952. | bil | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Bit J. H, Clement Bs, GE | J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the May Term of the Superior vit ee ee eee ee 84 FF Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the defendant has | been personally served with process, and the following issues have been submitted Mt . bh, o> 7 to and answered by the jury: Ai Janett Arney Boas | OIVORCE 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now ! { The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and | vs } empanelled answers the issues submitted to it j husband and wife as alleged in the complaint? i - | as follows: Hl Raymond R,. Boas | Answer: "Yes" Hi |! ay) . 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and rt North Carolina In the Superior Vourt — Mt : apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other mT Iredell County May Term, 1952 4 : ig Janett Arney Hoas j for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action? Plaintiff ; Answer; "Yes" - j ISSUES 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North i Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: "Yes" i I Now, therefore, it is ord red, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, D : id the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband Janett Arney Boas, be and she is hereby granted an abplute divorce from the and wife, as alleged in the complaint? ee TS ie eS defendant, Raymond R. Boas, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing Answer +. between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. it i 7 |) ” And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this rt Vid the inti ; Al plaintiff and defendant Separate and live separate and apart action to be taxed by the clerk. 1a) from each other, and h haw Hi ’ ave they lived separate and apart fom each other for more This 26th day of May 1952. i than two years pior to the commencement of this action? J. H, Clement Le Answer yes — Judge Presiding WN 111 Has the pl a ee ee | Plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North re ee ee ee Varolina for more th , an six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer ce ace IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 \No. 5267 Pauline R, Peacock } DIVORCE { The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and vs. {| empanelled answers the issues submitted to it { as follows: Clay Y. Peacock, Sr., ' NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court May Term 1952 IREVELL VOUNTY. Pauline R. Peacock, Plaintiff, Clay Y. Peacock, Sr., | ( Vs. I I Defendant, 1. Did the plaintiff, Pauline R, Peacock, and the defendant, Clay Y, Peacock, Sr., intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER _ Yes . 2. Have the plaintiff, Pauline k, Peacock, and the defendant, Clay I. Peacock, Sr., lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes 3. Has the plaintiff, Pauline R, Peacock, been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commement of this action? ANSWER Yes NORTH CAROLIN wa, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. May Term 1952 Pauline R. Peacock, | Plaintiff, | Vs. | Clay Y. Peacock, Sr,, I 1 Defendant, T his cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor J. 1 Vlement, Judge Presiding, and a jury ’ at the May Term, 1952, Superior Court for Iredell vounty, North Varolina, and the following issues ei uaving been submitte and answered by the jury, to-wit: 1. Did the plaintir Peacock, Sr., intermarry as all dges see, 2 Peacock, and the defendant, Clay Ye © complaint? ANSWER Yes i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ( an SECOND WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1952 Habe Monday, May 26th, 1952 tI 2. Have the plaintiff, Pauline R. Peacock, and the defendant, Clay Y, Peacock, Sr. lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes 3. Has the plaintiff, Pauline RK, Peacock, been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER _ Yes . The Court finds that the summons in this action was duly served on the defendant, Clay Y. Peacock, Sr., on the 10th day of April, 1952, by Sam Laws, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Varolina, by leaving a copy of the summons, and a copy of the complaint with the defendant. The Court further finds from the affidavit filed by the plaintiff, that the defendant was not at the time of the institution of this action, has not been since the institution of this action, and is not now in the military service of the United States of America. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are dissolved, and that the plaintiff, Pauline &. Peacock, is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Clay Y. Peacock, Sr., Let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff. : ‘ - See gig eta eine «sty, ‘ a This the 26th day of May, 1952. J, H. Vlement Judge Presiding a a a ee ee a ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 No. 5244 Miriam M. Stimson | DIVORCE | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Vs. { empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Raymond M. Stimson North Carolina, ! In the Superior Court , Iredell County. j May Term, 1952, Miriam M, Stimson i Vs. | ISSUES Raymond li, Stimson | 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER; Yes 2. Did the plaintiff ana defendant separate from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other continuously for more than two years prior to the institution of this action, ANSWER: Yes as alleged in the complaint? é. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North varolina for more than six months immediately prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes a North Carolina, | In the Superior Vourt Iredell County. { May Term, 1952. Miriam ii. Stimson | Vs. I JUDGMENT Raymond i. Stimson { This Cause Coming on to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North varolina, and being heard before His Honor, J. H, Clement, P Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted t0 it by the Court in favor of the plaintirr and a in gainst the defendant, as set out the record; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Hm SECOND WEEK =-- MAY TERM, 1952 a Monday, May 26th, 1952 a It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds HH | i Tt . ¢ matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Miriam M. Stimson, and Hl 0 the defendant, Raymond M. Stimson, be, and the same are hereby disolved and AA 1 set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendent, “ie He i ti Judge Presiding { J, H. Clement I | | | SER RMR KH KK KK KK OK OK i Mi aii | 1 No. 5241 ‘ hae 1 | DIVORCE a 1 mane SUnoey | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and i | f Vs {| empanelled answers the issues submitted to it | ‘ as follows: eae fy Lonnie T. Dudley i ) His | A North Carolina, In the Superior vourt Hi } Iredell County. Yay Term 1952. a el Annie Dudley | i ii Vs j ISSUES if i Lonnie T. Dudley | Ht . Were the plaintiff and the defendant married and are now husband and wife, as set out in the Complaint? Answer __yes II Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina for &@ period of six months, immediately prior to the filing of the Complaint? Answer yes SiS Has the Plaintiff, Annie Dudley, lived separate and apart from her Ptor to the filing of the complaint in this action? Answer yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 North Carolina, In the Superior Iredell County. May Term 1952 Annie Dudley Vs JUDGMEN T Lonnie T. Dudley This cause coming on to be heard, and being neard at this the May Term of Iredell County Superior Court, N. U., before his honor J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the records: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the bonds of Matrimony, heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are nereby dissolved, and the Plaintiff, Annie Dudley, is granted an abso lute divorce from the defendant, Lonnie T. Dudley. J. H. Vlement JUDGE PRESIDING Wo. 5233 Lynn W. Hostetler, DIVORUE VS The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Cecile U, Hostetler ae NORTH CAROLINA ay meres ‘ IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERTOR COURT Lynn W. Hostetler, Plaintiff VS Cecile U, Hostetler, Defendant i. were Answer. Yes r Have the 4 ‘nA plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years sa y S next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes 3. Has th aintiff | e plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, N. &- cor OF months immediately precedin Cc & the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes tr j ifr s sat? i¢ plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in tne Complai™ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY May Term, 1952 Lynn W. Hostetler, Plaintiff og { JUDGMENT Cecile C. Hostetler, Defendant | This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of marriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff ana the defendant be, am the same are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. t is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. J. H. Clement “Judge Presiding. “wk K Re No. 5221 DIVORUE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn Jane Norris Threatt | Vs. } and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: dance Kelly Threatt NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM 1952 JANE NORRIS THREATT, Plaintiff Vs. j ISSUES lance Kelly Threatt, Defendant | 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: _yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other ‘or more than two years continuously prior to tne institution of this action? Answer: yes 3. Hae the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State 0 nt of thigaction? f North 0 arolina for more than six months prior to the commenceme Answer : vex a ee aa rs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1952 JANE NORRIS THREATT, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT RANCE KELLY THREATT, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court, of Iredell County, North Varolina, before His Honor J, H, vlement, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Jane Norris Threatt, and the defendant, Rance Kelly Threatt, be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J, H. Clement Judge Presiding ‘No. 5140 John R. Bowie DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issws submitted to it as follows: — Ruby York Bowie NORTH C i AROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM 1952 JOHN R. BOWIE, Plaintiff Vs. ISSUES RUBY YORK BOWIk, Defendant l. OD ‘ id the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: yes 2. Did t i d the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, and iil they lived s y eparate and apart from each otner for more than two years continuous) prior to the institution of this action? Answer: yes 3. Has th © plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «-- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 NORTH VARO}INA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERK, 1952 John R. Bowie, Plaintiff Ve. JUDGMENT Ruby York Bowie, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court, of Iredell Vounty, Nortn Carolina, before His Honor, J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, John R. Bowie, and the defendant, Ruby York Bowie, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. H. Vlement Judge Presiding Se cteeenenne ee ee & % © Mo. 5224 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1952 IREDELL COUNTY Jane Norris Threatt, Plaintiff ORDER FOR CUSTODY OF Vs. MINOR CHILD Rance Kelly (hreatt, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by J. H, Clement, Judge Presiding of the May Term, 1952, Iredell County, Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court and the Court findinf as a fact; 1, ‘That one minor child, namely Patricia Lynn ‘threatt, was — the union of Jane Norris Threatt, and Rance Kelly Threatt, said child now being 17 Months of age. 2 That said minor child is now living with her mother, the plaintiff, and that said child has lived with her mother ever since the plaintiff and the defendant Separated on or about the 20th day of December, 1949, and that during Said time the defendant, Rance Kelly Threatt , has contributed nothing for the “upport and maintenance of said child, and that said child has been wholly 8 ‘eorted and maintained by its mother, Jane Norris Threatt. sug 28a Riad = —s eit a gee — orang a a ae er SS pouitinsen FEST RT rn en a $ - \ ——= rT" es 5 ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 3. The Court further finds as a fact that Jane Norris Threatt, the mother of the child is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and contro} of said minor child, and that the best interest of said child would be serveg by the child being in the control of the mother at this time. IT IS THEREFORS, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. ‘hat Jane Norris threatt, the plaintiff, mother of the minor child be, and she is hereby granted the custody and control of the minor child, Patricia Lynn Threatt. 2. That the plaintiff pay the cost of the proceeding. 3. ‘This cause is retained for further orders, including the custody of the child. It further appears to the Court that the above entitled action was brought by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of two years separation, and that the defendant filed no answer praying for the custody of the minor child, and that a judgment granting the plaintiff an absolute divorce from the defendant has already been entered at this term of the Iredell County Superior Court. This 26th day of hay, 1952. J. H. Clement Judge Presiding kee eK KK we KR Wo. 5232 Marshall Swanson DIVORCE Vs The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn ai : empanelled answere the issues submitted to it ‘ “— , s f : Rose Elizabeth Nelson Swanson . ase NORTH CAROLI! a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREVELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1952 MARSHALL SWANSON, Plaintiff Vs. ROSK ELIZABETH NELSON SWANSON LSSUES Defendant ’ le v id the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: yes 2. Did inti the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, and have they l ived se parate and apart from each other for more than two years continuowsy prior to the institution of this action? An8Swer: oi 3. Has th @ plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of “IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 North Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1952 Marshall Swanson, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Rose Elizabeth Nelson Swanson, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell vounty, North Carolina, before, His Honor, Jd. h. Clement, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submit- ted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, marshall Swanson, and the defendant, Rose Elizabeth N@lson Swanson, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from tne defendant. J. H. Clement Judge Presiding No, 5087 NORTH CAROLINA Iv THE SUPERIOR COURT TREVELL COUNTY Mamie Gabriel Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: H. C, Heath, Francis W. Troutman Gray M. Freeze, Plaintiff Clarence R. Lippard, R. J. Atweli, Glenn R. Pope, | H. B. Wallace, G D. Ward, J. QO. Hunter, B. R. ” Barkley, Fred P. Morrison and M, ©. Troutman. Imperial L A i : i Cieteeesias Insurance Company, Defendant l. Has the said Lem Morris disappeared from the community of his re Sidence, and his whereabouts remained unknown in such community for a period of Seven years or more and cannot after diligent inquiry be ascertained by those Rost . likely to have heard from or of him as alleged in the Plaintiff's complaint. ANSWER: Yes ao settee May ares St se. ae ema aaa PO . ancticeseeae aE eames een a A aL OITA T on ~ ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday , May 26th, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA { IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL VOUNTY j Mamie Gabriel j Plaintiff | Vs. JUDGMENT Imperia} Life Insurance Company, A Corporation Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the May Term of the Superior vourt of Iredell County; and the following issue having been submitted to the jury: 1. Has the said Lem Morris disappeared from the community of his residence, and his whereabouts remained unknown in such com- munity for a period of seven years or more and cannot after diligent inquiry be ascertained by those most likely to have heard from or of him, as alleged in the plaintiff's complaint? A , . i nd the jury having answered this issue "yes", upon sufficient evidence, presente by the plaintiff, to the satisfaction of this Court; And it appearing to the Court that the said Lem Morris disappeared fros the community of his residence seven years or more ago, that he has not been heard from or heard of, nor his whereabouts ascertained after diligent inquiry, by those most likely to have heard from, or heard of, him; that these facts having been found by the jury to the satisfaction of the Court, there arises @ presumption of the death of the Said Lem Morris at the end of seven years by virtue of the laws of tie State of North Carolina, pertaining thereto; and that the Court fi } : v nds as a fact that the said Lem sorris' death occuned on or about the latter part of August , 1950, And i ; i +t further appearing to the Court, from the pleadings of the partie hereto; that the plaintirr is t 1384465, ae beneficiary of a life insurance policy Number issued ; On the life of the Said Lem Morris; that the said policy was in for ; orce at the time of the death of the Said Lem Morris: ’ and that the plaintiff, as beneficiar y thereunder, is entitled to benefits from the defendant on the said policy,in the sum of $270.00 ag REF IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED , AND DECR l. That the said Lem Morri EED: 8 be declared dead, and he is hereby of August, 1950, That the plain tiff have and re fits c e under the above- over of the defendant as ben declared dead, as of the latter part 2. entitled life insurance policy Number 1384465, the sum % ey © costs of this action, to be t This 26 day of along with th axed by the Clerk. May, 1952, H. paehent Se ome. ee een ees x ge Pres & ai +e -* eo eS : ao 157 wers & Mtotneys for PistneitT ——— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ! SECOND WEEK ~-- MAY TERM, 1952 il Monday, May 26, 1952 1 do e 5086 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT { | IREDELL COUNTY Piedmont Lumber & Mfg. Co., Ince, | Plaintiff, { ves | JUDGMENT W. B, Harkey and wife, Lena } E, Harkey. Defendants, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by His Honor, J. H. Clement, judge presiding at the May term of the 1952 Iredell County Superior Court, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the parties agreed and settled all matters in controversy existing between them. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed: I That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of $786.69, with interest from the 22nd of June 1950 until paid. II That judgement be, and the same is hereby declared a specific lien upon the land hereinafter described, from and after tne 22nd day of June, 1950, as is provided for by the Constitution and laws of the state of North Carolina relative to materialman's lien, and that execution issue against said property F for the enforcement of the lien as provided for by law. Said lands being described as follows: All that certain tract of land lying and being on U. S. Highway No. 70 about one mile from the Eastern City Limits of Statesville, and being more Particularly described as follows: Beginning a nt in the center of U. S, Highway No. 70, said point being at the incertection of U. S. Highway No. 70 and a Vounty road; thence with the center line of U. S. Highway No. 70, North 56 deg. 38 min. West 141 7 to @ point in the center line of U. 3, Highway No. 70; thence South 12 deg. 36 min. rest 182 feet to a stake; thence South 56 deg. 38 min. East 141.4 feet to a stake in the center of the County dirt road; thence with the center of the County dirt road, North 12 deg. 38 min. East 162.1 feet to the beginning. The — Peing Subject to the right of ways to highways. Being the identical prope y a 19 eyed to Lena &, Harkey by the Statesville Indis tries, Inc., oy Sees ore of ’D 50, and recorded in Deed Book 214, page 133 of the records of the Hes teds of Iredell County, North Carolina. III That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the cost of this ation, This the 26day of May 1952 BY CONSENT. , eee Sage F ONSENT; udge Presiding : land. g A) Lewis oF Déerendan eR oe 4 ltt stan 5 Bika mst ; Hal Bit | ' : f || IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 | No. 5264 C. G, Mitchell | DIVORCE { The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn am Vs. empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Romell K. Mitchell { North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | May Term, 1952. C. G, Mitchell j vs, | ISSUES Romell K,. Mitchell | 1. Did tue plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: yes e. wid the defendant commit adultry, as alled in the complaint? Answer: yes 3+ Has the plaintiff been a vonifide resident of the State of North Varolina for more than six months immediately prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: yes North Carolina In The Superior Vourt, Iredell Vounty, | May Term, 1952. U. Ge Mitchell | vs. | JUDGMENT Romell K, Mitchell { This i Cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior U 0 . curt of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J. He Vlement, Jud idi : ’ ge Presiding and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues Submitted to j i an it by the Vourt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, th i ’ erefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony h tae ¥ Heretofore existing between tie plaintiff, C. G. Mitchell, and the defendant ii » Romell K, Mitchell, be, and the same are hereby disolved and set aside, and the plainti j Piaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. I, He ene ge res * x "™"SSese eevee etbece x oe Ox IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 Io. 5262 DIVORCE Gowan Addie Lee The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and | | | empanelled answers the issues submitted to it V8~ as follows: Otis Samuel Gowan North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County May, 1952, Term Addie Lee Gowan vs. | ISSUES | ! Otis Samuel Gowan 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Answer: yes 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for two years immediately preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Varolina for more than six months next preceeding tne commencement of this action? Answer: __ yes ut i complaint? In the Superior Court om North Carolina May, 1952, Term yy Iredell County Addie Lee Gowan ] VS. { JUDGMENT OF ABSOLUTE DIVORCE 4 Otis Samuel Gowan : | This cause coming on to be heard at the regular May, 1952, Term of Superior vourt for Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding and a jury and the jury having answered the following issues as indicated, and as appears in the record, viz: 1, Did the plaintiff ami the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: yes 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for two years immediately preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: yes than 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina fa more ome year next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: yes Tt is, therefore, ordered, adjusted and decreed, that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are hereby dissolved and that the plaintiff be, and he is hereby granted an a dsolute divorce from the defendant. J. H, Clement Judge Presiding Ke KR ke eR Re OK KR KR RR Rm mM IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 INo. 52h9 Dolores Alley Brewer DIVORCE | . , | The Divorce Jury #1" Being duly sworn and ; | ii vs. empanelled answers the issues submitted to it By Consent: f as follows: dolores Alley Brewer Joe C. Brewer, Jr. By WW this the 26th day of May, 1952. “IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 26th, 1952 J. H. Clement Judge Presiding Defendant expense of its care and maintenance if Hi Joe C, Brewer, dr. \ i HW) : Jo aughlin A_B Raymer ATH Va gL Attorney for the Plaintiff Atta ney for the Defendant thy un NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT KR KR KR RR KR RK Kk a ee aes jlo. 5259 Rose Lackey Harris vs Silas Harris ----------------------------- Continued i it PTV} = IREDELL COUNTY MAY TEEN - 1952 | \ No. 5270 J C Houpe vs Celest Teena Houpe -----------------------~-.------.- Continued | wil a DOLORES ALLEY BREWER | | i bhi i os rasiee ‘yo, 4751 ML Walker vs Wade Marlowe -------------------------- Continued by Consent | Pe ; I Wo, 5019 WC Campbell vs Charles Lynn Binkley --------------------------- Continued i a JOE U. BREWER, JR. i a oe a mil | el ; oe ' No. 5020 Vance beBride vs William . Herrin ---------------- Vontinued for Defendant yn Ae I. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the i ' Head complaint? No, 5023 Ellis T Bailey T/A the Hudson Bailey Paint Co vs ai aaa Wm D Fox T/A The Mack Fox Paint Co ------------------ Continued by Consent a yl “~" Maca Answer. _yes : We | 4} No, 5028 Moldply Corporation vs Home lade Uhair Uo ----------- vontinued by Consent ey 7K II, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina Hua mi for more than six months preceding the filing of this Complaint? Wo, 5111 Lonnie G Goforth vs Franklin Sigmon ----------------------------- Lon tinued a | ania et in aaa “nswer. _ yess No. 5164 Glenn Gilleland vs bitchell Glenn eseimore, Infant J. Be : tH) a git 4 Readies Meseimore & Alma J Meseimore ------------------------ Continued by Consent iM 1 | eet IlI. Did the plaintiff separate from the defendant and have they at tai iF lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the ‘No. 5191 Shaver “otor Co Inc, Thomas & Howard Vo Inc et al vs WW Li vomplaint? City of Statesville --------------------------------- Continued by vonsent i} Hh A ‘ ih 1 . i 3 i il { CORNET s TTR nnn" io. 5226 Tom Wilson vs J burle Johnson ---------------------------------- vontinued i Tt A 1 i i No, 5201 Parks Andrews McLean, Sarah McLean Kumple, Christing hcLean aaa k . Ee Patterson, et al vs Town of Looresville, N, Us. enee--eenenn--ne= vontinue i f | | ih pe Sorekian In the Superior Court , ' i" “ | sdb: — May, 1952, Term No. 5108 Rachel Odessa Connor vs Garfield Connor ------------------------ Continued ‘a | Y lt ; Ai Dolores Alley Brewer My itt, 1} | vs. | JUDGMENT | i hit HH Joe U, brewer, Jr, Lh : it H ay . This cause coming on to b Ss ior _— 4 : hing © be heard at the Regular May, 1952, Term of Super f Ay Judes — Iredell vounty, North Carolina and being heard before the undersigned ata 0 fe too and a jury and the jury having answered all of the issues submitte | ) | the Maen a the plaintiff and against the defendant as fully as appears in | . A Tai | I ie Hy t further appearing to the U =: t have 2 | | { ete ae h contract and agreement with referbens te the nuts a rick . | » “ichael Kent Brewer and La arriage, wie | . } contract and agreement the Court hereby mane eS 7 a) It is therefore, ordered. ad bere Bayly . d matrimony id pr pet pe pte. between the plaiatatl and the sofentens’ ban onl the oie are beret HAR, | anc the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defen ~ i Wh It is f ‘ be, # I i she is pabdbe tenenateet. ad judged and decreed, by consent, that the plaintiff 1 it arry Brent Siemee ted the full amd sole care, custody and control of the st wa pe rey ion 2 heoten = expressed condition and with the stipulation aan - | a of said child for a period of tharty ave, the. right to the care, custody ane ty Ae months of June, Jul rr " of thirty successive days at his election during chat si - 1 . defendant shali be entitled ra maid cal and upon the further conta durin eh the year; provided fave said child visit with him at other ing Hy health and general welfere sts do ovieun ak interfere with said child's seh : This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, May 28th, an incon ; , » Provide urther such visits do not U . | venience the plaintiff, : 1952, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. . i It is further ordered ad ju ty in whos ‘ na care and custod dged and decreed by consent that the party | | y said child remains for such time shall be responsible for the JUDG#/ PRESIDING It is further ordered nichae) { Kent Brewer, whi adjudged and decreed by consent that the child C, i shall continue eee aa Custody of Mrs, Belle Redmond, Troutmans, Ne ti ans she is hereby, : This cause, , plaintiff and the be, Redmond and it is ordered that Mrs. Redan of Mrs, id d full care, custody and control of 84 ow granted the sole an in so far as i defendant is t relates to the custody of the minor childrem retained for further orders, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 7 1B TES SUP ERLOR COURT qn SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK -- aver, ces 2082 J Wednesday, May 28th, 1952 Wednesday, May 26th, 195 | Hi Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina HW . hs next preceding the bringing of this action? i | Hi Court convenes according to adjournment on Wedn 26 | HIE 7 ee : ’ wechy Morning, for six mont He H)) May 28th, 1952 at 9:30 otclock A. M. P a ili ie aE) \ A 3. Have the plaintiff ami the defendant lived separate and apart from each Wie i ! i other continuously for two years next preceding the bringing of this action as i iil i YNo. 5250 alleged in the Complaint? AM | Idell Linney Speaks } DIVORCE ai ih; | Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Answer: "Yes". Wi i WH a " Mt ie vk. temas 2 see ihs was i NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Burke & Burke, Attorneys for the plaintiff, Wi i ‘Le - : , e . : +. A ’ ‘ m i | iW ii Romie Speaks eet eine. teed? jm, Upright, H.C, Heath, IT 1S, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, Idell Linney Speaks be ) i , R Speaks 1 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Romie Speaks, | l if IREDELL COUNTY and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff an a | reat | \ | It IDELL LINNEY SPEAKS | the defendant be, and they are hereby dissolved, ' | -Vv- J ISSUES And it further appearing to the Court, and the Vourt finding as a fact that there i i a n : e Graeme | is one child born as issue to said marriage, a boy, namely, Robert Speaks, now i | about six years of age who has been living with his mother, Idell Linney Speaks, iH “| 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married to each other as I ‘ plaintiff herein, since the separation of his said parents; and it further i : alleged in the complaint? | ‘ appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit 14g Answer: _ yes ' h ye and suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor child, and tnat 1h { 2 H : Lop . ; a - Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolin ; : the best interests of said child would be served by being in the custody of his | sae for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? i said mother; ay Answer: yes i 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each et , . and complete custody and control of said minor child. hia, other continuously for two years next preceding the bringing of this action as i" | alleged in the Comphint? . } { ' : | | | IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the plaintiff be, and she is nereby granted full And it is further Ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to Answer: yes be taxed by the Clerk. Tyis 28 day of May, 1952. | NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT — Judge Presidin } | IVELL LINNEY SPEAKS i ih Ree wee eK Kee Ke OK Ke HH ii -v- ; i JUDGMENT i), «= ROMIE SPEAKS i a This cause coming on to be neard and being heard before His Honor, J- He 1 i) Clement, Judge Presiding, and a Jury at the May, 1952 Term of the Superior Court tia of tredell County, and itAppearing to the Court that defendant has been personally | | served with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and answeret |} by the Jury: ay 1. Were the plaintirr her as HM) ©= alleged in the Complaint?" “D® defendant lawfully married to each ot Answer: "Yes", IN THE SUPERIOR COURT sy. — “ seeael IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --= MAY TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, May 28th, 1952 Wednesday, May 28th, 1952 | /No. 5137 fo, 5252 Ra | a ’ nit D B Ketchie ! DIVORCE Charles R. Renegar | DIVORCE Hl Jury sworn and empanel led as follows: Jury sworn and empanelied as follows: Hi Vs. C. B. Gantt, E. Je ankin, Clint E. Fox, ¢, 7 Cha Vs. C B Gantt, E, J. Rankin, Clint E. Fox, C. T. Chapman, (i Me. Me Gaither, W. E, Compton, A, P, McAlister. ' ' M. li. Gaither, W. E, Compton, A. P. McAlister, W. A, a Mollie Ketchie | London, Floyd W, Angley, v,. A, Upright, H. C,’Heath’ Elma 0, Renegar London, Floyd W. Angley, C, A, Upright, H. C, Heath Hil | { and Francis W, Troutman, ! } and Francis W, Troutman % i ~ ’ ‘ Ht NORTH CAROLINA me eee Vere North Carolina, | In The Superior Court, il — : ; on | IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1952 le Mean. May ‘Term, 1952. i} D. B. Ketchie He C R. Renegar Vs. ISSUES harles e & a i ISSUES a Mollie Ketchie Vs. | 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complain! J %lma 0. Renegar | Answer. yess 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now II. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for nore husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? : ? than six months preceding the filing of tuis complaint? Answer: yes Answer. _ yes ° 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, and have they III. Vid the plaintiff separate from the defendant and hae they lived separate lived separate and apart from each other continuously for more than two years prior and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the complain? ; z . Ta) to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? i) otal Answer. _yeS____. Answer: _yes | | — | 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the Szate of North Carolina a I NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR vOURT Stor six months immediately prior to the institution of this action as alleged in i | IREVELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1952 the complaint? | D. B. Ketchie Answer: yes Vs. JUDGMENT Mollie Ketchie North Carolina, { In the Superior vourt, This cause coming on to be neard, and being heard at tre May Term, 1952 Superis IredellCounty. {| May Term, 1952. Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding and a vharles R, Renegar j jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in favor of the Vs, j JUDGMENT ik plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record: and it appea | Elma 0. Renegar i ing to the Court that no children were born of the marriage of the plaintiff and Wi : This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior i defendant, vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J, H, Clement, Judge | It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged anti decreed that tne bonds of matrimony "residing, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it | heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and tne same are | bY the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the ) 1 hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the record: . | defendant. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony ij | This the 28th day of May, 1952, “retofore existing between the plaintiff, Charles R, Renegar, and the defendant, i) sia mae 0, Renegar, be and tle same are hereby disolved and set aside, and tie plaintiff J. H, Clement Judge Presiding is Sranted an absolute divorce from the defendant. UO URRHE KHER RRR HH Judge Presiding Seen eeenene exe eee ee ® Fe A IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, May 28th, 1952 No. 5251 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court May Term, 1952 IREDELL COUNTY. Charles R. Renegar, t Plaintiff, | ORDER FOR SUPPORT OF Vs. | MINOR CHILD Elma O, Renegar, X Defendant. } This cause coming on to be heard, am being heard by His Honor, J. i, Clement, Judge Presiding at the May Term 1952 Iredell County Superior Court, aii it appearing to the Vourt and the Court finding as a fact: ole That one minor child, namely, Charles R. Renegar, Jr., was born to the marriage union between the plaintiff and defendant, said child being now six years of age. willie That the said minor child is now living with his mother, the defendant in this action, and has lived with his mother, the defendant in this action since the plaintiff and defendant separated on the lst day of March, 1949. -3- That the plaintiff, Charles i. xenegar, is now in the military service of the United states of america, having been in the Air Force for about ten years, and that heretofore he made for tue benefit, maintenance and support of his minor child, an allotment under the mules and regulations of tne arned service forces applying thereto, and under whica $147.50 was received eaca month. -ly That the defendant will receive from the plaintiff's allotment, 4s nereif- above referred to, in the month of heret? June the same amount per month that nas fore been received, to-wit the sum of $147.50 -5- A . . nd it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff should be required t? nae ee contribute a proper and sufficient amount, based on his income, for the gaintenance and support of said minor child, and the Court finds that he shoul! be required to contribute the sum of $80.00 10, 1952 per month, commencing July — — T Is, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff, Vharles R, Renegar, provide maintenance and $UPi IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 9 SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Ni Wednesday, May 28th, 1952 i tor his minor child, Charles R, Renegar, Jr. i 2, That the defendant receive for the maintenance and support of said child the monthly allotment check in Jyne 1952 of One Hundred Forty-seven Dollars Fifty | Gents ($147.50). | | 3. That thereafter, the plaintiff shall pay for the benefit, maintenance and | . 2 | support of the aforesaid minor child the sum of Eighty Dollars ($80.00) per month, EE with the first monthly payment to commence and be paid on July 10, 1952, and a ii i like payment on the tenth day of each calendar month thereafter, with all paymamts \ i i | hereunder to be paid into the office of the Ulerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell i : Renegar, the defendant in this action and mother of the aforesaid minor child, | County, North Carolina, and then paid by the Clerk of said Vourt to t#lma O. i i i i) i for the benefit, maintenance and support of said minor child. rt ia i} 4. that the cost of tnis action be paia by the plaintiff. 5. This cause is retained for such further ordere in regard to the matters here- |) 4 , o z f " - in contained as the Vourt may at any time hereafter deem proper and necessary. He It appears to the Court that the above entitled action was brought by the iH Hh plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant, and that at this term of ut | Court the plaintiff has been granted an absolute divorce from the defendant on the ground of two years separation. a This the 28th, day of May, 1952. ; i “Judge Presiding. | mw we KK Kw Ke KR OK OK OK OK Ke OK OK Mo. 524,7 if North Carolina, { In the Superior vourt, 4 Iredell County, | May Term, 1952 | Robert P, Summers i JUDGMENT John W. Sewell, Jr, and + \. Bruner, | Vs, ) | 1 This cause coming on to be neard at tais Term of the Superior vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard before His Honor, J. H. Clement, Than Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that all matters and things in “ontroversy in this action have been settled and compromised, the defendant, John W, 8 ‘well, Jr., agreeing to pay the plaintiff the sum of $250.00, and costs of this action: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court, with the consent of he parties to this action, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, John W, Sewell, Jr., the sum of Two Hundred Fifty and No/100 ($250.00) Dollars, and that IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, May 28th, {952 defendant is taxed with the costs of this action. J. H, Clement Judge Presiding —_ Agreed To: J. G. Lewis Attorney for Plaintiff Land, Sowers & Avery by W. I, Ward, Jr. Attorney for defendant, John W. Sewell, dr. me OK OK x OK \No. 5223 North Carolina, ' In tne Superior Court, Iredell Vounty. j May Term, 1952, Jury Sworn and empanelled as follows: C. R, King J. K. Chambers i viarence X Lippam R J Atwell, Glenn R Pope, H B Wallace, H D Ward, J O Hunter, B R Barkley, Fred P Morrison, Ta. i WC Troutman, Paul Moore and Francis Troutman, James Wilson i ISSUES 1. Was the automobile truct of tne plaintiff injured and damaged oy the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: yes 2. What damages, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? ANSWER: _ $1,500.00 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL VOUNTY, MAY TERM, 1952 ’ o J. K, Uhambers, | me JUDGMENT. James Wilson, | this cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J. H. Clement, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted it by the vourt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as set out int record: It is, therefore aintiff » Ordered and adjudged by the Court that the pi 1e defendant the sum of 31 00 is taxed wi recover of t This the 2&th day of May, 1952, J. H, Clement Judge Presiding. ***# ee taeeeneeneeas IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, May 28th, 1952 Mo. 5215 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY G, W. Wallace, Plaintiff vB. ISSUES L, A. Anderson, dre Defendant. 1, Was the plaintiff's truck damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer no 2, If, so, did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to said damage? Answer ee 3, What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant because of the damages to and loss of use of the plaintiff's truck? Answer 4. Was the defendant's care damaged by the negligence of the plaintiff as alleged in the answer? Answer: no 5. If so, did the defendant, by his own negligence, constiribute to said damage? answer: ' 6. What amount, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover from the plaintiff because of the damages done to defendant's automovile? Answer North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County May, 1952, Term 0. W. Wallace, Plaintiff ve. L. A, Anderson, Ure, | } JUDGMENT | Defendant ] This cause coming on to be heard at the Regular hay, 1952, Term of Superior Vourt fr Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues Submitted on the plaintiff's action in favor of the defendant and having answered *he issues Submitted to it on the defendant's cross action in favor of tne Plaintiff and against the defendant as fully appears in the record: iff It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaint es dant have and recover nothing of the defendant in this action and that the os oo fa ii sa a tae he che ih el al) eden i ig ale , “IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ita SECOND WEEK «e- MAY TERN, 1952 ‘Ae Wednesday, May 28th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT wi — SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, May 28th, 1952 have and recover nothing of the plaintiff in his cross action, so, 5256 ALilee Smith MeKibbon vs William John NcKibbon --------------- Continued Wi It is further ordered and adjudged tuat the plaintiff pay the cost, yo. 470 B Myers & wife vs D O Cowan, dr et al ---------------------- Continued ' i i of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. do, b711 ° B Myers & wife vs WB Crowson & ee ee ee eee eee ore i i i janes Petts ee ee ee Ke eK Kk Kk Kk kK ok fio, 5059 Juanita G —— oes : seni oo | iI , i j No. 1610 fio, 5084 JM Schafer vs John A Miller & wife Elaine E Miller ---------- Continue i i lt ‘ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA) IN TH SUPERIOR COURT No. 5081 Lucinda Bellamy vs Alfonzo Stevenson -------------------n-nnn= aes i } 3 ‘ COUNTY OF IREDELL DOCKET NO. 1610 Wiow5066 | iW I) = sstare oF worva carouina a 0 0 FOGG OR RE GRR pee mm renner sem mn nner n nner nen ae ih | i —_ ) QRDER No. 5065 Fred W Hudson vs Moor Food Store Inc ------------------------= Continued | . | Karl D. ne See ) No, 5072 MD Tilley vs Mrs Josie Jordan eWnn--------nnnnennnnncnnnnnn= Continues 1 | | | Hn | “4 | WHEREAS at the November 6, 1951 Term of Iredell County Superior i | at vourt in the County of Iredell, North Carolina, before the Honorable H. Hoyle ‘I | i : Sink, Judge Presiding, and above named defendant, Earl D. Southern, Jr. entered li i i a plea of Nolo contendere to the crime of Larceny, and 1 ie WHSREAS it was the judgment of the Court that the defendant be | | Sentenced to Jail, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State ae Highway and Public Works Commission of North Carolina for a period of Two Years, | which sentence was suspended, and the defendant placed on probation for a perid of two Years under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its Officers with such conditions of probation being imposed as are set forth by Statute and with the special condition that he be returned to Pulaskie in the State of Virginia under the reciprocal probation rule, and WHEREAS it is now brought to the attention of the Court by a duly authorized Probation Officer who is a sworn Officer of the Court that the said defendant, Sarl D. Soutuern, Jr., has wilfully violated the terms and conditions of the probation judgment as Shown by the fact that Jatt, Viretais fo tae a Ssix-months sentence in Pulaskie one | i ’ or Visturbing t P : to the | Probation and Parole Officer” "Wieetnie hae aect ae in Virginia, his attitude has not been good. This is in viola an g . e ; . ti e "not violate any penal law o on of the condition that h f any State ernment and be of general good behavior®. or the Federal Gov IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that a capias be issued by the Ulerk of this Court for the above named defendant, that he may be taken and retumed %? the Court for a hearing as to his guilt or innocence of violating the orders of the Court, or other duly authorized law enforcement officer of this County shall return - defendant to Iredell County ami shall produce him in Court for the hearing above mentioned, 3 * This the 28 day of May, 1952, H, Clemen UDGE PRESIDLING No. 5113 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mrs, Margaret Nicks, Administratrix of the Estate of John Everett Nicks, Plaintiff Vs JUDGMENT Mrs. Johnnie Jean Howard Madden Administratrix of Raymond Revere Madden, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Varl G. Smith, Ulerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. CC. G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County Consented to: R. A, Hedrick Attorney tor the Plaintiff R. A. Collier Attorney for the Defendant oe Iwo. 5254 Worth Carolina Iredell County In the Superior Court ‘ yw. Westmoreland and Graham Westmoreland, T/A Mooresville Roofing and Heating Company Plaintiffa v8. JUDGMiN T D, E. Comer and Mattie Comer Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, C.G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 26th day of March, 1952; And it further appearing to the court tnat said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendants on tne 2nd day of April, 1952; And it further appearing to tne court tnat no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendants ana no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time in which pleadings may be filed nas expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Two Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars with interest thereon from the 8th day of July, 1949; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred and rifty and 40/100 Vollars, with interest thereon from the 6th day of July, of this action, This 23rd day of May, 1952. C, G. Smith —tierk of the Superior Court eeKek ER RK KK KR KH OF 1949, and the costs oe nr i H ‘No. 5257 NORTH CAROLINA, “ee IREDELL COUNTY. Colonial Manufacturing Company, i Incorporated, Plaintiff, ! Vs. JUDGEMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Klutz-Schafer Furniture Company, Incorporated, ' Vefendant. ! This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to tne vourt from tne statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and tnat the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; ae 48, THEREFORE, vO.SIVERED, ORDERED, AUVJUDGED aD DECREED, Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Vlerk of Court, This the 26th day of hay, 1952. GC. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Vourt of ireden vounty, North Varolina. Consented to: Adams, Vearman and Winverry, Attorneys for tne plaintiff, BY: Monroe Adams wR RRR OK Ke Ke KH a M0. 5029 JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA vittie L. Clark, Administratix of Samuel Spring Term, 1952 Franklin Clark No. 381 Iredell County. VSe Stanford Lowell Lambreth This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion that there is no error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Vourt. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that tne opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable J. Wallace Winborne Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS AFrIRMED And it igs considered and adjudged further, that the Plaintiff do pay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, to wit, the sum of Two and 70/100 Dollars ($2.70), and execution issue therefor. PY Adrian J. Newton __ (SEAL) — Tierk of the Supreme Court. Iredell County, N. 2 Filed in the office of the Clerk Superior Court/on the 3rd day of det, 1952. C. G, Smith Clerk Superior vourt. 176 “io. 4710 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1952 C. B, Myers and wife, Elizabeth Austin Myers; T, L. Dysard, Jr. and wife, Virginia Dysard; Jonn W° Scott and wife, Kathleen Burnette Scott; M,. B. Roebuck and wife, evelyn S. Roebuck; F. T, Loftin and wife, Katheryn H. Loftin; U. W. Plyler and wife, Vorothy Plyler; James Theodore and wife, Florence Theodore; H. T. Ward and wife, Mary Jd. Ward; and all other persons owning property in the development of C. bB, myers and wife, Slizabeth Austin Myers, known as "Sunrise nilis, who desire to join themselves as plaintiffs in this action, JUUGMENT Plaintiffs, Vo. U. OU. Vowan, Jr. and wife, srownie Lois Vowan, and hb. Jd. svernart and wife, Willie T. Everhart, 2 68 #8 88 £8 £8 88 8 08 88 88 88 88 8 26 88 88 oe 8 be Vefendants. THIS CAUS“® coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J, i, UVlement, Judge Presiding, at the May Term, 1952, Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to tne vourt from the statement of counsel for the plaintiffs as for the defendants tnat the plaintiffs and defendants have agreed upon a settlement of all matters and things arising on the pleadings in this cause, the defendants agreeing to make certain repairs to the dwelling houses now located and constructed and owned by the defendants on Lots wos, 1,2,3 and &§ in Block "c" of "Sunrise Hills*, all as shown by the plat recorded in Plat sook NO. 3, page 135, Iredell County Registry, tne repairs to said two dwelling nouses being as follows: wach dwelling house is to be brick veneered with brick of good quality; each dwelling nouse is to be provided with proper guttering; each dwelling house is to nave both front and rear porches reparied and reinforced, and tne cement work of said porcnes is to be repaired or replaced so that the appearance thereoi 36 to front and rear porches will be even and free of apparent roughness; as to the dwelling house located on Lots Nos. 1 and 2 of Block "U" of "Sunrise Hills", the porch on the West side thereof is to be removed and the entrance into said dwelling house at that point is to converted into a "stoop" type entrance S . . aid work of brick veneering and repair is to commence within 30 day§ the dé ' this j : from the date of this judgment and is to proceed to completion as rapidly 4s possible and comnie ns ais ; urate with good workmanship, unless prevented by matters of procurement of lavor or materials beyong the control of defendants, or by at of God. And it f i urther appearing to the vourt that in consideration of the repair work to be done by . by defendants as nereinbefore set forth to the two dwelling houses above menti nese tioned, the plaintiffs have agreed that the restrictions a8 % building lines and location and the restrictions as t Ss to j to building costs applicable 1,2,3 and 4 of Block "C" of "bunrise Hills" by virtue of the instrumert of C. Be Myers and wife, Ejizabeth Austin Myers, recorded in Book of Deeds 192 at page 70, Iredell County Registry, may be removed and cancelled, and plaintiffs naving agreed to lift and remove from Lots Nos. 1, 2, 3 and & of Block "vu" of "gynrise Hills" tne said restrictions; other restrictions not having to do with puilding lines and location and building costs, however, to remain in full force and effect. If Is, VHEREFORG, ORDERED, AUJUUGHD AND DECRE®D by the Court, by and with the consent of the parties nereto, that the defendants proceed within 30 days from this date to comuemce with the repairs to said dwelling nouses in the manner and as above set forth, and proceed to complete said repairs as rapidly as is commensurate with good workmanship, unless prevented by matters of procurement of labor or material, of by act of God. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND UVevRaed by the vourt that tne restrict- ions as to building lines and locations and the restrictions as to builaing costs applicable to Lots os. 1, 2, 3 and& of Block "UC" of “Sunrise Hills" oy virtue of the instrument of Uv. b. myers and wife, Llizabeta austin i.yers, recorded in ook of Deeds 192 at page 70, Iredell Vounty xegistry, be and they are sereby set aside, cancelled and rendered null and void, other restrictions not having to do with building lines and locations am building costs, however, to remain in full iorce and effect; and it is furtner ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiirs nerein, their heirs, executors and assigns be, and they are hereby, iorever barred » : : : 7 , 5 . rt from asserting any claim against tne owners of 4oUS NOS. 1, 2, 3 and & ol Block "vu of Sunrise Hills" on the basis of tne sai’ restrictions as to building lines and locations and building costs. IT IS FURTHER AJJUDGED that tne defendants herein pay the costs of tnis action, This the 28th day of bay, 1952. ee De Ulement “Judge Presiding AGREED ANU VUNSENTED TO: Adams, Dearman & Winberry by: vs B, Wi io inberry mey for Plaintitts 1.6, Lewi ws 8 Zeb V. Lon Jr At mney Tet Der eadan torney for efendants IEE RE A RR RRR ROR i sea ae a ak a a one nn ine pete —anmgemt oo ai Sot Sk em et eee ee eee A 5288 IREDELL COUNTY ti} + ’ ih Peoples Loan and savings 3ank, ant s : , i Plaintiff, { } vs Walter L. Harbin and James F,. Harbin and wife, Mrs. James F. Harbin, Defendants. attorneys for ai to t laintiii t ull amount o PE a H te G ereon, 2 that the plaint aed t hie Yn a on? yi a! ™ ~ id an bl PF a £ a + . sie Lt a8, U ‘efore, IPAOCrEQ, i Wi fy nN9nN 81)" c ay ’ 1 t HH nsuitea ar Chat Ui eit nts 9 ; Pee it fo nt j - Co Ce i] : Thés June Lith, Ly 520 ’ / | Ce ted + T vonsentea to June ill, 1452 | Peoples Loa Savines ecott & Collier, Attorneys a } si Sy: M. Le Nash NS RE ST SEE 4 7 Set aati eS ee ms a a ne oo OOO OO mS This cause coming on to be hearc, an IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE tHE CLERK JUDG!.ENT OF NON-SUIT being heard def'ore the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the plaintiff that tne matters and things in parties and that the defendants have paid te su on in this action, tozether with as elected to take a voluntary nonsuit sea and decreed that the plaintiff be with the costs in this action to be tare GC. G. Smith Clerk superior court TERE EE SE SHB e te aice st "i 5256 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Alilee Smith McKibbon, Plaintiff, ) ( Vs. MOTION William John MeKibbon, ) Defendant, NOW COMES Alilee Smith McKibbon, the plaintiff in the above entitled action, and respectfully moves the court tnat this cause be removed to Vabarrus county, North Carolina, for trial on the grounds that the convenience of the witness and tht the ends of justice would be promoted by such removal. This the 28 day of bay, 1952. LAND, SOWkAS & AVi iY Neil S. Sowers Attorneys for Plaintiff ORDER THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard on the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attomeys for the plaintiff, that this cause of action be removed to Cabarrus County for the convenience of witnesses; And being heard and the court inis discretion grants the motion, and it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that tie said cause of action be moved to vabarrus County, North Carolina, at Concord, and tnat tne same be put on the docket there for trial. This 28 day of May, 1952. J. H. Vlement Judge Presiding - rifteenth Judicial District me me uw ok me kk mK mK mK mw Kk OK OK OK K i | { a i j ey Si DS SE SE A ae soe’ r - = eran ~~ <p > en eo pect nn ae 181 Oy IN THE SUPERIOR coupe on Wo, 5320 T} CAROLINA, In the Superior Court en L. Watts and Martin 5. Travis, ( - Before the Clerk tradine anc doinc business as Watts IREDELL COUNTY. & Travis Motor Company, ( Plaintiff ( JUDGMENT | Davis Cabinet Company, 1 Plaintiff, | ank P 2, Defendant Vs. ) | JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT 5 ee Pee ee nt et nutoie Guan Coan, Getee an ae tiuts-Schafer Furniture Company, | Deatakk ta Gitidact we datinie fie upon motion oy the plaintirf for jJudgnent Incorporated, 1 Defendant. court i complaint s filed and | z a ie el ) » 49523 ut a _ and 15 fupcher © n; to tae court that said sumions together with a This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned ; : 6 Cc 4 Y "e ser Cre e naanit oO tne <iSt aay or kay 1952; ny phil anes Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing Hy i! ] . ef ; = court Ghat no answer, GemurreP, OF Other a as ¢ ot th . Senainan tie ca erie ae pleadinzs to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearmwan and Winberry, attorneys fo ha 7 . . adangs may oe filed has expired; r t ve . al the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been i i PL ’ | fess contr cy to nay a sum of dhe | : Contract, ly, nar eix dollews an settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires totake a voluntary af > \ Ome J : Yeo} rom the 23r r of s yer, 19503 at s | . nonsuit: i ia ’ , 2 | red, red, & ecre: iat the vlaintiff t a | .11), — } ae Ok Paes reu ana six dollars and elever IT IS, THEREFORE, CUNSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, Upon motion of li ts yin & 24rdq aay of Decemoer, 195U, and tne UR EG i Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, that the plaintiff be ite i 1 ta ; S elt ) Jv oe wi) pti , nonsuited , and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, Wy | : i ; / ° . n at and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaint iff by the Clerk Ih . x | a GC. GG, smith —_ ae Cl r ) t Sup 3 10 * Ud rt of Court. li i} : redell County ae This the léth day of July, 1952. i tT 1h G, G. Smith i} | Clerk of “uperior Court of Iredell Wee County, North Carolina. a ae | Consented to: a Pre Dearman and Winberry, ) ttorneys for the plaintiff, | By: Monroe Adans | i Wt wh | me on No. 5122 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK Elmer W. Estes, Plaintiff, i VSe JUDGMENT M. R, Patterson, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Slerk of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff that all sumonses to the defendant, M. R. Patterson, which includes bot) the original and alias summonses, have been returned, "Not to be found in Iredel) County,"; that the plaintiff's attorney is infomed and believes tiat the said defendant, Mi. R, Patterson has moved to Florida where he has established his permanent residence and has elected to take a nonsuit in order to clear this case from the Court Doc ket; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk, This 23rd day of July, 1952, CG, G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Consented to: SCOTT & COLLIER By _M. L. Nash Attarneys for the Plaintiff, RRR RK Ke Ke x IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---~----- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, July 28th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1952 yoRTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in apd for the County and State aforesaid, at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 28th day of July, 1952, at 10:00 o'clock, A. N., when and where His Honor, Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, Fall Term, 1952, is present and presiding and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial Distriet of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J, C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and opened Court by order of the Court. ’ J, C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the First Week of this the August Term, 1952 Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: W, B, Harris, Jr. L. O. Brown Willis Watson Shumaker J. D. Kyles W, H, Shuford Paul C, Troutman L. F. Smith J. A. Gunn lee C, Brown, Jr. C. H. Ostwalt B. M. Reid J. L. Honeycutt A, L, Shaver Fred L. Bell W. L. Davis R. Brandon Holland Nat E, Smith D. E. Kennedy J. E. Brawley C. V. Collins Robert H. Harris Floyd B. Smith J. Be Lundy Chas. A. Baggarly 1, W. Barnette Rex C, Weisner E. C. Collins W. B. McKay J. C, Holland C. W. Settlemyre Graham W. Clary C. C. Blankenship *. ¢, Lineberger J. C, Linker W. S. Murdock + 5. a W, A, Sloop W. C. Kyles T. M. Honeycutt T. W. Griffin “oit Roseman J. M. Marlowe Alvin Morrison me Fy Soe William A, McLaurin L. W. MacKesson, Jr. Ross Stewart at Brown, Jr., Robert H. Harris, Paul C, Troutman, C. H. Ostwalt, J. B. Lundy » A. Sloan were excused by the Court. hw Barnette, D. E. Kennedy were excused by doctor's certificate. Wi ‘lian A, MeLaurin was out of the County. L, 0. Brown was excused by the Court. d, ‘ MN. Marlowe was not returned. W, Ss, Murdock was deceased, tw ' Griffin was excused by the Statute. C tt Roseman had no address. John A, Price was Maaliggeete $F ; allowed by the Judge to substitute for L. W. ion Culp appeared for Jury duty as ardered by the Court, a SESS - yt Se: ee eS - mtr ns — eee ee eed Sk Bs ae 2 ——— ng IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «----- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, July 28th, 1952 The following good and lawful men and women were duly drawn and sworn as the Grand Jury to serve for the six months period ending December 31, 1952 ’ to-wit: J. C. Linker W. B. McKay Alvin Morrison C. V. Collins Je Re L. Honeycutt Brandon Holland Rex C, Weisner J. A. Gunn J. E, Brawley Graham W. Clary Willis Watson Shoemaker A, L. Shaver J. C, Linker was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. E. E. Collings Nat E, Smith Ross Stewart Floyd B. Smith W. B. Harris, dr, C, W. Settlemyre J. B. Goforth was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. The following were sworn as talesman jurors for the week: Warren White Patterson Weber ‘No. 1103 State vs Guy Ramsey ‘No. 1205 State Nathan Patterson vs Wo. 1339 State vs David H Harkey Wo. 1345 State vs Mary Saunders \No. 1354 State Benjamin Jackson threatte, Jr vs John L. Milholland Elmer Ervin James E, Pharr William F, Taylor W. L. Duke Max C, Josey FALSE PRETENSE Alias Capias. BASTARDY ._ Defendant called and failed. fa and Instanter Capias, DRIVING DRUNK Judgment complied with, POSSESS LIQUOR Alias Capias, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Judgment Nisi Sei Continued under former order. 185 |] il Ho. 1369 State vs Jimmie ReeceWooten ‘No. 1371 State vs Garris Calloway Waddell No. 1376 State vs J, Samuel Brawley INo. 1377 State vs Ralph Edward Farrell Wo, 1396 State vs Norman T Hoover ‘No, 1403 State vs Clement P Gaiter, Jr No. 1404 State vs Linburg Price lo, 1415 State vs Clifford Charles Hall "lo. 1509 State vs Toby Hyde ‘No. 1549 state vs Millian Leroy Smith Yo. 1558 State vs lottie Bell Cloud ‘No, 1572 State v8 wd Little » alias shall Little ——— ee —_——_ — ee —_——— a ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Mondlay, July 28, 1952 RECKLESS DRIVING Judgment complied with. PERMITTING Continued under former order. TRANSPORTING LIQUOR Continued under former order. AIDING & ABETTING Continued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Continued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant called and failed. Fa and Instanter Capias. Judgment Nisi Sei FORGERY Defendant called and failed. and Instanter Capias. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa LARCENY Alias Capias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias LARCENY 7 It is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay the cost and fine heretofore ordered plus the additional cost of this action. BREAKING & ENTERING Alias Capias REO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday , July 28, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, July 28, 1952 i | No. 1599 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT 1730 2ND OFFENSE FOR DRIVING DRUNK Wei State Continued under former order, ~~ Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci hid ee 1 ‘ Fa and Instanter Capias. i George E, Ureson ] wus naward Frye Hl tte No. 1604 } DRIVING DRUNK ia } ; ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Ge —" Alias Capias. — Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi sci Joseph Fulton Woods i " — Fa and Instanter Capias. Le Dd. Wo. 1605 | ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT aio, 1732 DRIVING DRUNK = Continued under former order, State Continued for the Term. Vv ; 8 " G. A. Benfield Coleman Ray Miller i | No. 1606 | DRIVING DRUNK 1752 | MURDER | —_—" Alias Capias. ‘ae 3 | Continued for the Term. Pa " vs f i Joseph Fulton Woods | Willie Lee Plummer | J ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON tio, 1672 | CARNAL KNOWLEDGE We = ,, Defendant called and failed. Judgment Mid Sei _— A True Bill. i Fa and Instanter Capias. v ‘i i J. D. Gray i a William Thompson i Hi te , noe | ASSAULT ON FEMALE No. 1735 FALSE PRETENSE by, = . | Continued under former order. State A True Bill. cf vs ih Homer A Nantz i Flora D, Bailey | a eaeESeRERaE anid aaeieteaeinee sine ceectioeaeae ie eae ae E Wo. 1644 otate vs Troy Fesperman ABA\DON & NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order, Ko. 1681 State _ VS Wade Donald Yow ee a MANSLAUGHTER A True Bill. No. 1660 ; ; . ren | State | ABA\LON & NON-SUPPORT lio, 1725 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON | vs Continued under former order. State { A True Bill. P. We. B vs Byers | Robert Ardis .Nos. 1669 & 1670 State vs Marvin C. Blackwelder Christopher Columbus Mize W=57 EMBEZZLEMENT Continued by Consent. Defendant enters a pl hrowg> ea of Not Guilty, t his attorneys, McLaughlin and Battley. one Sworn and empanelled, ury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. Wos. 1641 & 16 State M2 vs Weldon Campbel 1 Willard Chambers DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY . VieLaughlin, Battley, Lewis and Henderson Attorneys State. sOr ctendants through their attorneys, Eugene Trivette and Neil S. Sowers enter a plea of Not Guilty. ‘No. 168) J sworn and empanelied as follows: _ State | POSSESS NON~TAK PAID LIQUOR Bank Culp, J. Ae White, T. J. Weber ant, W. es vs Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sed W. L. Duke, Wm. F. Taylor, J, C, Holland, r x. P, Maude Lewis Fa and Instanter Capias, W. C. Kyles, L. F. Smith, W. L. Davis and T. MM. | Honeycutt. Wa : »No. 1729 . i State DRIVING DRUNK ! vs 4No. 1752 State vs Willie Lee Plummer Wo. 1753 State vs Will Gibson IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, July 28, 1952 _— hyo. 1151 he Grand Jury returns in open Court : (Sixteen sreuent) a True Bill of Ineeeeeene body State charging the defendant, Willie Lee Plumer, with wae Gilbert Jones the capital offense of Murder in wrd as follows: oe Mga "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA a J Iredell County erior Court y Term, 1952 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR 0 . That Willie Lee Plummer late of the County of ier on the 12th day of July, A. D., 1952, with force an’ arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, wilfully feloniously, and of his malice aforethought, did kill’ and murder One Joe Dill contrary to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided, am against tie peace and dignity of the State. Zeb A. Morris volicitor, "No. 1752 State vs Willie Lee Plummer INDICTMENT MURDER Witness W. F. McCoy William Blankenship x H. MK. Reid T. A. Waugh ; Beatrice Wilson Those marked x sworn by the undersigned foreman, a examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found A TRUE BILL. J. C. Linker, loreman Foreman of tne Grand Jury. iURDER _The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body (Kighteen present) a true bill of Indictment charg the defendant, Will Gibson, with the capital offense of Murder in words and figures as follows: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT Iredell County July Term 1952 : THE JURORS FOR THE STATS UPON THEIR OATH PRESAM: That Will Gibson late of tle County of Iredell, on the lyth day of May, A. D., 1952 with force and arms, a | and in the said County, unlawfully, wilfully felonious! TOL of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder IM KNOX contrary to the form of the statute in such made and provided ‘ di ity d the Seinen » and against the peace and dign ec em Zeb A Morris _— Colicitor. "No. 1753 State vs Will Gibson INDICTMENT MURDER Witness W. D, Berg bthel Bell Gibson Dela Smith Rufus Thompson, Lillian Thompson Mitchell Brawley diss ha Brawl Robert Gavin = Sworn by the undersigned foreman, a8 the Grand Jury, and this bill £0 Ps bs Those marked x examined b A TRUE SI C, Linker, Foremet rs, | orgman of the vray at 9:30 o'clock A, M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, July 28th, 1952 MURDER The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body (Eighteen present) a true bill of Indictment charging the defendant, Arthur Giblert Jones, with the capital | offense of Murder in words and figures as follows: "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY July Term, 1952 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRBSENT: That Arthur Gilbert Jones late of the County of Iredell, on the 14th day of June, A. D., 1952 with force and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, willfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder one William Carl Hoosier contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. ae Zeb A, Morris Solicitor. Mo, 1757 State vs : Arthur Gilbert vones INDICTMENT MURDER Witness J, UC. Rumple X Sam Laws Dr. R. S. Holliday John Morrison Hal Bennett Thae marked x sworn by the undersigned foreman, and exatined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found A TRUE BILL. J. C. Linker, Foreman “Foreman of tie Grand Jury. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, July 29th, 1952, kien 191 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT —_ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT if FIRST WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM, 1 oe ‘ Tuesday, July 29, 1952 ° 952 FIRST WEEK ------ AUGIST TERM, 1952 at He Tuesday, July 29th, 1952 Hae ay 1 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tue | Hit , } sday Morni | Bie: in| mg, Yo. 1682 | RECKLESS DRIVING WA 4 as | e 1 : - ey | July 29, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A, M. State i Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere through AE Ve Me ner nis shiereey, Alvin Hall, a Hh Bobby Gray ™ DGMENT of the © i Ha Wo. 1591 FALSE PRETENSE Be epnbinea 1e ourt is that the defendant be \ ih Stone i ed in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a a t appearing to the Court that at the August Ten a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, to be assigned to work iy Hi a >, 2 1951, the defendant was sentenced to a term of not | on the roads under the supervision of the State HE iy rthur D. Talbert less than TWO nor more than FOUR YEARS in the State Highway and Public Works Commission, ue if | ene. and that the defendant appealed to the ’ This sentence is suspended for a period of two Hi \ ti | Supreme Court of N. C.; it further appearing to the (2) Years upon the following express conditions: | i ih } Court that the defendant failed to perfect his ; 1. That he pay a fine of 350.00 and the cost. Hh H ; | appeal and that the time for perfecting appeal has :: ep a oes epenehe 8 pees eee iy | now expired, it is, therefore, ordered that capias public highways of N. C. for a period of Six Months. Hie i a ee a forthwith to put the prison éailtes ae pe stage. 06 poh ae and not iif it ate affect. so e State of N. C. f . a | | Capias and commitment to issue at i: aa mai |." term on motion of the Solicitor and upon proof ae i Wos. 1738, 1739 & 1740 | BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCE satisfactory to the Judge then residin t ae State ’ ENY & p g that this f | wa — enters a plea of Guilty in all three errr anes as a chia Sedo part to comply He Hows cw . , mA | | oward C. Pharr saa cases are consolidated for the purpose of it i ent. a 5 eet a“ > a: 4 1 UDGi.ENT of the Court is that the defendant be : = a ve. geas ) SPEEDING: RECKLESS DRIVING: FAIL 2 STOP FOR SIREN: it) i | confined in the State Prison et Raleigh, frau i Zbl 745 & L7ly PAIL T0 STOP FOR SIREN: RECKLESS DRIVING: SPEEDING: i | {| of not less than THREE nor more than FIVE YEARS, vs | vate kde af Gite te ret — 1) lier i} a | In No. 1741, Judgment of the Court is that the | i ™. s7oh AID & ABETT IN FORGERY a t —— be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell hy i 2ba . vr A et , : i > Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. } County for a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, to be assigned Neh | { JUDGMENT ; | to work on the roads under the supervision of the HL i Hs Sea B. Bellew ‘ENT of the Vourt is that the defendant be i State High 4 Public | reir fer id a | eenftned in the Geenen dahl of f . ghway and Public Wor s Commission. Fi eae U=32 | a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS ° redell County for j In No. 1742, JUDGAENT of the Court is that the id Hit | work ots . HONLHS, to be assigned to | defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Hay i ee, tae ae a the supervision of the | County for a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, to be assigned Wit ghway and Public Works Commission. to work on the roads under the supervision of the Til State Highway and Public works Commission. This Wi sentence to take effect at the expiration of the Wos. 1755 & 1756 — state ~~ d ‘ sentence imposed in No. 1741. TE , v8 | JUDGHENT of the Coore plea of Guilty. In No. 1746, JUDGMBNT of the Court is that the Ta Freeman Henry Washington | nfine o the Court is that the defendant be defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell i Co28 - ined in the State Prison at Raleigh, for a ere County for a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, to be assigned ae of not less than THREE nor more than FIVE YBARS. to work on the roads under the supervision of the | State Highway and Public Works Commission. This Hue silo. 1719 MURDE | sentence to take effect at the expiration of the ae tate ™ “oo. terms heretofore imposed in #1741 and 17h2.(au¢y 229) . } vs : he Solicitor in open Court states that he will st Nos. 1743, 1744 and 1745 are consolidated fof’the Bi | Robert Ardis = for a verdict of Murder in First Degree, but . purpose of Judgment, ae or a verdict of Murder in Second Derree or manslaugs SUDGMENT of the Vourt is that the defendant be } as the evidence warrants, confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for if iB Jury Sworn and empanelled as follows: a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, to be assigned to work he j oT Culp, T. J. Weber, W. L. Duke, Wm. F, Taylor, on the roads under the supervbion of the State i ‘. A. Sloop, W. C, Kyles, L. F. Smith, W. L. Davis, Highway and Public “orks Commission, *his sentence net | T, he Honeycutt, W. H. Shuford, J. D. Kyles and to take effect at the expiration of the term hereto- aa} | E. E, Jonson, , fore imposed in 1741, 1742 and 1746. This Sixty-Day na | term, however, is suspended for a period of Two Years i a ie upon the following conditions: Re \No. 1685 State { AID & ABEYT IN RUCKLESS DRI 1. That the defendant not operate a motor vehicle Glen , Defendant enters pape ym contendere. on the public highways of N. C. for a period of ) oo ca oe la verdiot Of not pO ea cilia, cnr | Bightoes it the defendant be of good behavior and not i ere violate any laws of the State for a period of Two Years. MH | Capias and commitment to issue at any subsequent CARNAL KNOWLEDGE ' term on motion of the Solicitor and upon proof vs Continued for the def satisfactory to the Judge then presiding that the if William Thompson or defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with | the terms of this judgment. State Wo. 1672 | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Tuesday, July 29, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «----- AUGUST TERM, 1952 a aE = > = wera ow CE —— = Tuesday, July 29, 1952 ‘GRAND JURY REPORT AUGUST TERM, 1952 The Grand Jury found True Bills of Indictment on all cases that were passed on that were presented by the Solicitor. Committees were appointed to inspect the following county Properties: County Jail The Grand Jury inspecting the county Jail and found the total of 17 male prisoners, 5 white, 12 colored. We recommend mattress covers and if possible repair and repaint the kitchen. Also, increase the costs of meals fran 30 to 40 cents. We find the Jail clean and in good repair with the exceptions noted, County Home A committee visited the County Home and found same to be in good order, Kitchen and dining room in perfect shape, plenty of fruit, meat, and grain. Fam, vinyard, and garden well cared for. Mr, and Mrs, Sherrill are to be complimented very highly for the fine careful work they are doing. County Court House 4 committee inspected the County Court House and recommend that fans be placed in Court room to move hot air out for the General comfort of the Court. That the >, li, A. Office walls be water proofed and that floors be covered in P, i. A. office and Negro Farm Agent Office when possible. We have examined the records of the Clerk of Court and find t.em in order, The Justice of Peace records are up to date. Recister of Deeds records were well kept, W i ; ry ns . | e find the Court House in good repair with the exceptions noted. Prison Camp A committee visited the Prison Camp on highway 21. We found 100 colored prison inmates, All premises and buildings were found clean and in good cond Pr i : ovisions and supplies were in abundance. In talking with several prisoners, was our opinion that they were well cared for. J. C, Linker — oreman {tion it , 1630 igs 30? on Herman Stutts Ao, 1632 State vs tio. 1499 State vs Robert Ford Robinson Mio, 1748 State vs James Fleming No. 1749 State vs James E, Benfield "io. 1750 State _vs Henry F, Heglar flo, 1751 otate vs Janes Pennell Wo. 1737 State vs Odell H, Waddell W~16 Mos 1641 & State 1642 vs Weldon Cam pbell "lard Chambers Ce ee ne em ne nee SPEEDING Nol Pros With Leave. RECKLESS DRIVING Nol Pros With Leave. DRIVING DRUNK Continued by consent. DRUNK & DISORDi&RLY Nol Pros With Leave. RECKLESS DRIVING Nol Pros With Leave. DRIVING DRUNK Continued by consent. DR.ViNG DRUNK Judgment complied with in lower court. remanded to Recorder's Vourt. Lase BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, This sentence is suspended and the defendant is hereby placed on probation for a period of Two (2) Years under the supervision of N. C. Probation Commission; That as special conditions of probation ordered by the Vourt, the defendant shall pay the cost of this action. DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY At the Close of the State's evidence the defendant, through his attorneys, Sugene Trivette and Neil Sowers, makes a motion as of Non-Suit. Motion of Non-Suit allowed. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, July 30th, 1952 » ab 9:30 O'Clock A. M, fase , A Pom oe ee — Nee EN ERS te TOME AS LE iw ae yarn ~ 2 194 SS. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Wednesday, July 30, 1952 Ynis Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning at 9:30 O'Clock A, NM. \No. 5094 Ada Carrie Candler DIVORCE | i Jury sworn and empanelled -vs- ! | Floyd Candler j NORTH CAROLINA IRSVELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Ada Carrie Candler } -vs- i ISSUES Floyd Candler 1 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer, Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes 3. Has the Plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT August Term, 1952 Ada Carrie Candler j -vs- | JUDGMENT Floyd Candler | This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding - regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered t issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, 4° appears in the record; It is : t is, thercfore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of marriaé? heret i ti retofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same o hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce 1 the defendant. It i I s further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. Dan K, Moore —" Judge Presiding. 195° No. 1719 State vs Robert Ardis yo . 1665 State vs Alexander Hu Wo, 1719 State vs Robert Ardis IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK sae - AUGUST TERM, 1952 Wednesday, July 30, 1952 ghey Montgomery o IN THE MATTER OF MRS.VHAGLER, CONTEMPT. It appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact from thetestimony offered, that the witness, Mrs. Helen Ward, was a defendant's witness in the case of State vs. Robert Ardis for the murder of Clyde Fox; and it further appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that after the court adjourned but while still in the court house, that Mrs. Hagler, a sister of Clyde Fox, deceased, while court was recessed, accosted the witness Mrs. Ward threatening to assault her and used abusive language towards her; the Court thereupon adjudges that said Mrs. Hagler is in contempt of court. The Judgment of the Court is that Mrs, Hagler pay a fine of $25.00. MURDER Hugh G. Mitchell, Attorney for State. Attorney for the defendant. The Solicitor in open court states that he will not ask for a verdict of Guilty of Murder in the lst degree but will ask for a verdict of Murder in the 2nd degree or manslaughter as the evidence may justify or warrant. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: J. A. Price, G. C. Lineberger, C. ©. Blankenship, R. P. Ellis, Jas. E. Pharr, J. ©. Holland, L, F. Warren, J. P. Patterson, Elmer =rvin, T. M. Hill, Mack C. Josey and J. A. white. Hozia Price, MURDER j Jury returned a verdict of Guilty to Manslaughter. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, July 3lst, 1952, © 9:30 o'clock A. M, JC. fe “Judge Presiding Jr ee ee ee ted GSA v2 te erento er See Ee Aer See <== IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Thursday, July 31, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes accor ding to ad jour nment on Thursday Mo ing rn ’ at 9:30 o'clock A. M. No. 1665 State vs Alexander Hughey Montgomery ‘No. 1719 State vs Robert Ardis Wo 3h \No. 1720 State vs Robert Ardis Wo. 1646 etate vs —— MURDER Jury returned a verdict i ace of Guilty of Second Degree JUDGMENT of the Court is that the de confined in the State Prison at Raleieh Grae labor, for a term of not less than SEVENTEEN (1 nor more than TWENTY (20) YEARS. 7) MANSLAUGHTER JUDGMENT of the Vourt is that the def confined in the State Prison at Raleigh, atte labor, for a term of not less than TWEL nor more than FIFTEEN (15) YEARS. — ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON - INTENT Nol Pros With Leave. ' 7 DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through His Attorney, Hugh Mi Mitchell enters _ of Guilty. oo , JUDG:.cNT of the Court is that the defendant yo. 1656 State vs Ben Wilhelm W=26 ‘No. 1661 State vs Bessie Fair be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, assigned to work in or around the County Home or Farm. me ee vr Jefendant enters a plea of Guilty. JUDGMIN T of the Vourt is that the defendant be contined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. MURDER McLaughlin and Battley, Attorneys for tie defendatt. Solicitor in open court states that he wll not ask for a verdict of Guilty of lst Degree Murder, but will ask for verdict of 2nd degree murder oF manslaughter as the evidence may warrant. Jury sworn and empanelled. This Honorable C ourt takes a recess until Friday Morning, August 1, 1952, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, his E PRESID This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Friday Morning, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. No, 1661 State vs Bessie Fair INo, 1736 State vs Pastal Summers 0-38 No, 1648 State vs Ernest Alexander Cah,2 ‘No. 1697 State vs James Currence dio, 1696 State a illiam Ho ki —™ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT rr FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Friday, August 1, 1952 | 4 ae _ | Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. i | | ROBBERY & ASSAULT Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Banks Culp, T. J. Weber, W. L. Duke, Wm F, Taylor, W. A. Sloop, W. L. Davis, T. M. Honeycutt, W. H. Pe Shuford, J. D. Kyles, E. E. Johnson, Fred L. Bell, He i and J. A. Price. TP Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as clarged in Wh the Bill of Indictment. i) JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be i confined in the Common Jai] of Iredell County for i a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, to ba assigned to Ht work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. . | It is ordered by the Yourt that this sentence not it begin until October 1, 1952 provided the defendant | gives a justified bond in the sum of $1,000.00. 4 ASSAULT ON OFFICER et Judgment of the Court is that the defendant i be confined in the common jail of IredellCounty | for a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, to be assigned to Hy work on the roads under the supervision ofthe State a Highway and Public Works Commission. Hie It is ordered by tle Court that the $7.00 paid Vibe ie into the Office of the Clerk Superior Court be turned i over to the County to apply on Jail fees. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY . Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. |} Jury sworn and empanelied as follows: Banks, Culp, T. J. Weber, W. L. Duke, Wm. F, Taylor, W, A. Sloop, Ww. L,. Davis, +, M. Honeycutt, W. i. Shuford, J. D. Kyles, E. &. Johnson, Fred L, Bell, and J. A. Price. q Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged. | JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for WW a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, to be assigned to wak on the roads under the supervision of the State High- way and Public “orks Commission. (a. page 224) BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY 4 Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. iy Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Banks Culp, T. J. Weber, W. L. Duke, Wm, F, Taylor, . W. A. Sloop, W. L. Davis, T. M, Honeycutt, W. H. . Shuford, J, D. Kyles, &. E, Johnson, Fred L. Bell, and J. A. ‘rice. Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged. JUDGMENT of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the super vision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. JNo. 1688 State vs Mrs. Edna A. Thompson W-56 No. 1665 ‘ State vs Alexander Hughey Montgomery INo. 1753 State vs Will Gibson 0-57 No. 1686 State vs Flay Emery Dockery No. 1687 State vs Dave Jackson \No. 1689 State vs Glenn L. Setzer Wo. 1692 State vs Edward Summers Wo. 1693 State vs Roy Barkley Wo. 1694 State ve Troy Forsyth \No. 1722 State vs Roy ht Davidson IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Friday, August 1, 1952 POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant through- her attorney, Macon § enters a plea of Not Guilty. 7 inoue, Jury sworn and empanelled. Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty, ORDER It appearing to the Court that the pistol belonged to Richard Lawrence, deceased. It is therefore, ordered that the pistol be returned’ to the representative of the deceased person's Estate. MURDER The defendant through his attorney, Grant Bolner, enters a plea of Guilty to Manslaughter which plea the State accepts. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the State Prison at Raleigh for a ten of not less than TEN (10) nor more than TWELVE (12) YEARS. DRIVING DRUNK Continued POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Continued | DRIVING DRUNK Continued Ei. BEZZLEMENT Continued EMBEZZLEMENT Continued EMBEZZLEMENT Continued 1 POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Continued Mo, 1723 State 8 ‘ail Franklin Wilson Mo. 1725 State vs Robert Ardis Mo, 1726 & 1727 State vs Leroy Goodson No. 1728 State vs Clyde Oscar Sigman fo. 1732 State vs Thomas Crouch Johnson Wo, 1733 State vs Raymond Ralph Fox No. 1734 State vs Willard L, Dison No. 1735 State ow Flora D Bailey No. 1757 “tate vs Arthur Gilbert Jones Wo, 1687 State vs Wade Donald Yow vo. 1700 State vs No. 1702 State IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Friday, August 1, 1952 TRANSPORT & POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Continued ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued FALL TO STOP FOR SIREN: Continued DRIVING Di NK DRIVING DRUNK Continued DRIVING DRUNK Cont inued 2nd OFFENSE FOR DRIVING DRUNK Continued DRUNK & DISORDERLY Continued FALSE PRETENSE Continued MURDER Continued MANSLAUGHTER Continued ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Cont inued VIOLATION OF "OFF PREMISES LICENSE" Nol Pros With “eave. re IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Friday, August 1, 1952 | Ao. 1710 TRANSPORT & POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR | State Continued ia vs i, Donald Wade Yow { i i Hh) = No. 1747 | SPEEDING a | State Continued for the Term by Consent, vs Fred Lee Smith j This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, August 4, 19581 at 10:00 o'clock A. M, it — Lr al Goi 201 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. AUGUST TERM, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, August 4th, 1952, at 10:00 o'clock, with Honorable Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding and holding Vourts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District, "all Term, 1952, present and presiding. J, C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the second week of the August Term, 1952, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: L, M. Scott C. C. Ward irs, J. Ralph wontgomery Earl R. “Llam M, T, Waller Rowland 4. Hartline S, H. Stevenson E, S,. Armour Mrs. Kattie Lee Terry Gill Millsaps i, B. Lanier R. S. Sharpe V, L, Wagner G, C. Jordan B, P, Link E. B, Simons Halbert *, Crowson J, G. York Harold Crawford C. L. Bustle i, B, Kestler, Jr. John D, Ford hk, L, Davis E.J. Everhardt 0. A. Stutts Mrs. J. C. Holmes Vietor Crosby Arthur Mitchell R, C, Sloan E. 0. Cloaninger J. G. York was excused by the Court. E, J, Everhardt was excused by doctor's certificate. The following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed the Vivorce Jury #1" to-wit: L. M. Scott, Mrs. J. Ralph Montgomery, M. T. Waller, 8. Hi Stevenson, Mrs. Katie Lee Terry, H. B. Lanier, V. L. Wagner, B. P. Link, Harold Crawford, R. B, Kistler, Jr.., M. L. Davis and O. A. Stutts. No, 5108 E fachel Odessa Connor eee Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and = ; empanelled, answers the issues submitted to it Garfield Connor, as follows: AEE ae RAT OT RIERA TE Krenn gn an oo whinpenteerenm ¥ iy mene > st os Tenn. - | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT aii eer 2 | SECOND WEEK ----- - AUGUST TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 19 Ht | cone 52 Lae Monday, August 4, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 ; i i | Wal HH North Carolina, In the Superior Court 3, Has the plaintiff, Rachel Odessa Connor, been a bona fide resident of the Wh atate of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of | i Iredell County. August term, 1952 1 | , . : 7 this action? VME i Rachel Odessa Connor iN | ' ’ ANSWER Yes e | ie a Phintiff 4 : ISSUES The Court further finds that summons was duly served on the defendant by 1g Me Ee ee eee ie if a publication in the "Statesville Daily", a newspaper published in Iredell County, Ii i | Ht | Garfield Connor, VP va | na, and that the last publication of said summons was on the 29th d AE 1 | Defendant, North Carolina, , sential i Hh of August, 1951, and that the summons was duly served, and the defendant was in 14! i ni 1. Did the plaintiff, Rachel Odessa Connor, and the defendant, Garfield Court as of the 5th day of September, 1951. Hi ve Connor, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? The Court further finds that no children were born to the marriage union of | ) { ne | ANSWER _ Yes se the plaintiff and defendant in this action. | } ii iy CURD TERR 1 ls vi 2. Have the plaintiff, Rachel Odessa Connor, and the defendant, Garfield IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, That the bonds | | Connor, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and | i} J } b immediately prior to the commencement of this action? they are dissolved, and that the plaintiff, Rachel Odessa Connor, is granted an | i i ANSWER __ Yes ss absolute divorce from the defendant, Garfield Connor. Let the cost of this action i i ih af al i: 3. Has the plaintiff, Rachel Odessa Connor, been a bona fide resident of the be paid by the plaintiff. q eh i hal state of North Carolina for six months imnediately preceding the commencement of This the 4th day of August, 1952. ih 1 oy it Ps } } this action? Dan K, Moore i 5 ANSWER _ Yes . Judge Presiding i he aE e a ee ee ee ee ib NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court ii IREDELL COUNTY. Mo, 52 i August Term 1952 5258 | DIVORCE iN Rachel Odessa Connor, j ; Vesper Johnson Wooten The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and 4 ie empanelled answers the issues submitted to it itt . Plaintiff, vs | as follows: i Vs. Reuben Wooten | JUDGMEN | Garfield Connor, ' at Te ee Nio rth Carolina ior Court oa ; Iredeli hr | In the Superio 9 | ! Defendant, . August Term, 1952. Vesper Johnson Wooten i This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor Dan K, Moore, v8. j ISSUES Reuben Wooten j Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the August Term, 1952, Superior Court for Iredell County, North C i f Ys arolina, and the following issues having been submitted t0, and 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now it answered by the jury, to-wit: : hus band and wife, as alleged in the complaint? he D id the plaintiff, Rachel Odessa Connor, and the defendant, Garfield Answer: # Connor, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Yes ° re Nat 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separate and canal ase Slee an ee Odessa Connor, and the defendant, Garfielé 2 ‘hey lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to imnediately prior to the commencement cf ents cnclont two consecutive year he institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? | ANSWER Yes. | Answer ; Yes | ! 3+ Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina 1 id 5 2 ee eda ag i O04 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a SECOND WEEK -----= AUGUST TERM, 1952 | | Monday August 4, 1952 for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as alleged ip the complaint? i Answer: yes ° 1} i ve | , ai | North Carolina, | In the Superior co i Iredell County. August Tern, 1952. i ih Vesper Johnson Wooten J i 7 j Vs. ' JUDGMENT Hit Reuben Wooten i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by 1 It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Vesper Johnson Wooten, and the if defendant, Reuben Wooten, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Dan K Moore Judge Presi ding KK oe ae ae ok .NO. 5270 a DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it ‘ vs =m Celest Teena ‘ioupe as follows: NORTH CAROL INA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1952 J. C. Houpe, Plaintirr Vs. ISSUES Celest Teena Houpe, Defendant l. Did i f the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband a4 wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: yes 2. Did th i . e plaintiff and defendant separate fran each other, and have - lived sepa parate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously ee to the institution of this action? Answer: yes the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the mo . 205 a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -<<=-- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 5. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolina or more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: __ yes __ f IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1952 ORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY J, ©, Houpe, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Celest Teena Houpe, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Dan K, Moore, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of natrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, J. C. Houpe, and the defendant, Celest Teena Houpe, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Dan K, Moore Judge Presiding wm MK a a a a Ho. 5273 j DIVORCE louise Taylor Galliher The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it vs Hubert Lee Galliher as follows: NORTH CAROLINA, TREDELL COUNTY. In the angersee Court August Term 1952 louise Taylor Galliher, 1 Plaintiff, | Vs, | | ! Hubert, Lee Galliher, Deferd ant. 1. Did the plaintiff, Louise Taylor Galliher, and the defendant, Hubert Lee Gal liher, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes epee enaeemaaes © *. Have the plaintiff, Louise Taylor Gallihar, and the defendant, Hubert Lee Gal liher, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years aaa SSE eS ay rae — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER _ Yess 3. Has the plaintiff, Louise Taylor Galliher, been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the conmencenent of this action? ANSWER _ Yes . NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. August Term 1952 Louise Taylor Galliher, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT Hubert Lee Galliher, Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor Dan K, Moore, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the August Term, 1952, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues having been submitted to, and answered by the jury, to-wit: ; i. Did the plaintiff, Louise Taylor Galliher, and the defemiant, Hubert Lee Galliher, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes 2. Have the plaintiff, Louise T orgy ; ’ aylor Galliher, and the defendant, ube Lee Galliher, lived separate and apart from each oeher for two consecutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER _ Yes 3+ Has the plaintiff, Louise Taylor Galliher, been a bona fide resident of the State of North C : f ake anata arolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement 0 ANSWER _ Yes ST The Court further finds that Summons was duly served on the defendant by publication in the "Statesville Daily Record," a newspaper published in Iredell Count J i ; ounty, North Carolina, and that the last publication of said summons was 0m ” 9th day of May, 1952, and that the summons was duly served, and the defendant wa in Court as of the 16th day of May, 1952 The Court further finds that no children were born to the marriage union . the plaintiff and defendant in this action ponds and TT 1S, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AMD DECREED, That the of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, the they are dissolved, and that/plaintiff, Louise Taylor Galliher, is granted + IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «--- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Moniay, August 4, 1952 yorce from the defendant, Hubert Lee Galliher, Let the cost of this absolute di action be paid by the plaintiff. This the 4th day of August, 1952. oe K, Moor udge Presiding ‘ek & SB x ok me OAK a a ee ee ee ee DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: 52 es , Starnes vs Vera B. Sweet Starnes North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term, 1952 Dewey A, Starnes Plaintiff vs. Issues Vera B, Sweet Starnes Defendant Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: yes II Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: _yes III Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: yes North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term, 1952 Dewey A, Starnes Plaintiff vs, JUDGMENT Vera B, Sweet Starnes Defendant { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding and a jury at the August Term, 1952, of the Superior Court of Iredell “ounty and it appearing to the Court that defendant has been personally served abt i; 4 208 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and answereq by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: "Yes." 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the state of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes," 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next prededing the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes," Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Dewey A, Starnes, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Vera B. Sweet Starnes, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it further appearing to the court, and the court finding as a fact, that there one minor child of said marriage, Alice Faye Starnes, who has been living with her father, the plaintiff, since the separation of her parents, and it Curther appearing to the court and the court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor child, and that the best interest of said child would be served by being in the custody of her said fatier; It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be and he is hereby granted full and complete custody and control of said minor child, until the furtheyprder of ts court. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action - be taxed by the clerk, 4 this 4th day of August, 1952, Dan K, Moore Judge Presiding Se REeeeeneeenennk eee ue & & SO — ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 Ho. 5283 { DIVORCE William Augustus Travis t The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and | empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: vSe Dorcas A. Travis, : i WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | IREDELL COUNTY | William Augustus Travis, Plaintiff, ISSUES VS. Dorcas A. Travis - Defendant. 1, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina | | for at least six months next preceding the institution of this action? | | Answer: ____yeS__ | i 2, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the | ! Sar Complaint? Answer: yes 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years prior to the institution of this action? | Answer: yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY William Augustus Travis, Plaintiff, =. JUDGMENT Dorcas A, Travis Defendant. | I | I This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Dan K, Hoore, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the August term of the Superior Court of lredell County, and it appearing to the Vourt that the defendant has been properly served with process and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court, Now, THEREFORE, on the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, attorneys for the Plaintife, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, William Augustus Travis, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Dorcas \\ Travis, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff ang the defendant be and they are dissolved. a Sa ee ee a 5 ee ae ee pt een - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This the 4 day of August, 1952. Dan K, Moore ge Presiding, Ko Kk Kk kK kK KK ok §No. 5292 | DIVORCE | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn an Helen Reid, empanelled answers the issues submitted to it vs as follows: Sam Reid NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1952 Helen Reid, Plaintiff Vs. ISSUES Sam Reid, Defendant 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously prio to the institution of this action? Answer: _ yes 3- Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolin for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: yes NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1952 Helen Reid, Plaintiff "Oe JUDGMENT Sam Reid, Defendant This cause Coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Dan K, Moore Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issus submitted to it by the Court in favor o: n the the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out 4 record: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «-=---- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of ’ trimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Helen Reid, and the defendant, ma Sam Reid, be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute ’ divorce from the defendant. Dan K. Moore “False Pretiting woe OK OK KK eK OK OK KOK The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Pearl H. Sloan empanelled answers the issues submitted to it vs as follows: David L. Sloan fio. 5295 | DIVORCE North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term 1952 Pearl H, Sloan j VS. | ISSUES David L, Sloan ' 1. Were the plaintiff am defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina 6 months immediately preceeding the filing of the complaint in this action? Answer: Yes 3. Did the plaintiff and defendantseparate from each other as alleged in the complaint and have they lived separate and apart from each other for two years immediately preceeding the filing of the complaint? Answer: Yes North Carolina In the Superior Vourt Iredell County August term 1952 Pearl H, Sloan i vs. i JUDGMENT David L, Sloan j This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the court before His Honor Dan K, Moore, judge presiding and the jury and the jury having answered the issues in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony heretofore hereby dissolved "isting between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are . \ ss a l ? ‘ re. eee Dee cee r= = nee Paar sepia agri . ce _ Pre iE Bn os mene IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «----- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, It ig further ordered and adjudged that the costs of this action be taxed by the Clerk as provided by statute. Dan K, Moore Judge Holding the Courts of the 15th Judicial District gk wk kk KOK RK ee ke ok oe eo, DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: INo. 5297 Clarence Moore Blackwelder Mary Savage Blackwblder North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term, 1952 Clarence Moore Blackwelder Plaintiff vs. ISSUES Mary Savage Blackwelder Defendant Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint! Answer: yes II Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: yes III Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: yes North Carolina In the Superior Court I redell County August Term, 1952 Clarence Moore Blackwelder Plaintiff JUDGMENT Mary gavage Blackwelder Defendant | ~ | | | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Da " loore, Judge Presiding and a jury at the August Term, 1952, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that defendant has been personal’ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 rved with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and se answered by the jury: 1, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes. " 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." 3, Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Clarence Moore Blackwelder, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Mary Savage Blackwelder, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, And it further appearing to the court, and the court finding as a fact, that there is two minor childrenof said marriage, George Patton Blackwelder and Clarence Moore Blackwelder, Jr. who have been living with their father, the plaintiff, | since the separation of their parents; and it further appearing to the Court and the court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor children, and that the best interest of said children would be served by being in the custody of their said father; It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be and he is hereby granted full and complete custody and control of said minor children until the further order of this court, This 4th day of August, 1952. Dan K, “oore “Judge Presiding koe ke KOK KR RK KK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn empanelled answers the issues submitted t it as follows: /No. 5298 Otis A. Smith, Jr. vs Margie B. Smith North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Otis A. Smith, Jr. j vs | ISSUES Margie B. Smith i 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yea 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this actiom’ Answer: Yes North Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County Otis A, Smith, Jr. j VS. ’ JUDGMENT Margie B. Smith I This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding over the Aurust Civil Term 1952 Iredell Superior Court, and being heard before said Honorable Dan K. Moore, and a Jury, the following issues were sub- mitted to the Jury: 1. more eg the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the institution of this action? 2. Were the plaimiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and d eparat’ efendant separated, and have they lived separ a! and apart continuously for two years next pieeedine the institution of this actie The Jury having answered all of the said issues "Yes", It is, therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds i} % . e of matrimony heretofore exiwting between the plaintiff and the defendant be pan dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Margie B. Smith, and that the cost of this action be taxed agains? r plaintiff by the Clerk, This 4th Aug. 1952, Dan K, Mo Judge Presiiing IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 5299 DIVORCE fro. The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Paul Gray empanelled answers the issues submitted to it a vs Rosetta S. Gray HORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1952 PAUL GRAY 1 VS i ISSUES ROSETTA 3. GRAY i 1, Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint ? Answer. _yeS 2. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint: Answer. Yes ° 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the filing of this complaint: Answer. Yes _. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST Tix, 1952 PAUL GRAY i vs i JUDGMENT ROSETTA S. GRAY i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the August Term, 1952 Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding and a Jury, andthe Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted and absolute diworce from the defendant, This the 4th day of August, 1952. Dan Ke Moore == udge Presiding a ee ee = IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 No. 5301 JIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn ang Nell A. Vhester empanelled answers the issues submitted t it vs as follows: Jack D. Vhester { In the Superior Court August Term 1952. North Carolina Iredell County Nell A. Chester i Vs { ISSUES Jack D. Chester | I Were the Plaintiff md the Defendant married and are now husband and wife, as set out in the complaint? Answer yes II Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina fora period of six months, imuediately prior to the commencement of this action.? ANSWER Yes III Has the Plaintiff, Nell A. Chester lived separate md apart from her husband, Jack D, Chester, the defendant for a period of two years prior to the commencenent of this action? Yes North Carolina, C Iredell County In the Superior Vourt, August Term 1952. Nell A. Chester j Ve JUDGMENT Jak D. Chester i This case coming on to be heard and being heard at this the August Term 19% of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before his Honor Dan kK. Moore, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the Jury having answered the issues sub- mitted to it by the Court in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, ® set out in the record: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff, Nell A Chester and the Defesti# Jack D. Chester be and the same are hereby dissolved and the Plaintiff 4s grantet an absolute divorce from the defendant, r shall It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff, Nell A. vheste 217 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 permanent custody of the three children of the above union, have the Dan K, Moore JUDGE PRESIDING. KeRR KM KKK KOK ilo. 5303 DIVORCE : sit The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Pauline C. Schoss empanelled answers the issues submitted to it ¥8 as follows: Oscar Schoss ‘ North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term, 1952 Pauline C. Schoss | Plaintiff ; vs ISSUES Oscar Schoss Defendant ! s Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Asnwer: __yes II Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: __yes III Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fron each other yi for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? | : Answer: _ yes North Carolina In the Superior Court Va Iredell County August Term, 1952 Pauline C. Schoss Plaintiff vs JUDGMENT i Oscar Schoss Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Den Be Noore, Judge Presiding and a jury at the Aucust Term, 1952, of the Superior Court * Tredel County, and it appearing to the Court that defendant has been properly ‘erved with process by publication, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: | ~ rE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --<--= AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes." 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes," Now, therefore, it igérdered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Paulin C. Schoss, be and she is hereby granted and absolute divorce from the defendant, Oscar Schoss, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT yoRTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Richard Pearson, Plaintiff | AUGUST TERM, 1952 Vs. JUDGMENT May Whiteside Pearson i ane ey Defendant , This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the i i Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Dan K, Ht Moore, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: if It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Richard Pearson, and the defendant, Ruthie May Whiteside Pearson, be and the same are dissolved, and the er een = yl be taxed by the clerk, plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Ph ri ‘et SR Rlipl Ste, RI cs \No. 5305 1. This 4th day of August, 1952. tiie at Biasiti Hi 1 th Soret Presid (vt is i Dan K. Moore ~ Judge Presiding / we BR EY Judge Presiding Biat , 4 mem mM mK mK me mK me om OO Or OK OR Se oe i | } * OK OK MOK wo OK OK OK KK OK OK i | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Richard Pearson vs. Ruthie May Whiteside Pearson | DIVORCE NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREJELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1952 Richard Pearson, Plaintiff Vs. ISSUES Ruthie May Whiteside Pearson Defendant 1. Did the plaintiff ad defendant intermarry, and are they now husband - wife, as alleged in the Complai nt? Answer: _ yes 2, Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, and have the? lived separate and apart from each other for more tnan two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North — for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: yes dio. 5306 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it Bessie L, White as follows: ! Vs. luther Franklin White te at te NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 1952 Bessie L, White, Plaintiff Vs. luther Franklin white, Defendant 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? | Answer: yes | 2, Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer: yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolina f T More than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: yes X\ ee 4 4 ~ : . Ba 4 PY ee i" a ae aot tela —_————— can ee es ere oe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 NORTH C AROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1952 Bessie L. White, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Luther Franklin White, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set ou in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, bessie L, White, and the defendant, Luther Franklin White, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an ab- solute divorce from the defendant. Dan K, “oore Judge Presiding zk Ke OK OK OM WNo. 5308 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted t it _« - as follows: luary Frances Miller Vharles Edward hiller NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 1952 Vharles Edward Miller Plaintiff -vVSs- Mary Frances Miller Vefendant l- Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for at least six (6) months next preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER _ Yes 2- Were the plaintiff and defendant legally married, as alleged in we ANSWER Yes ~ gsi? 3- Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for two sauces years next preceding the comnencemen ANSWER Yes t of this action? couplet IN THE SUPERIOX COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 1952 Edward Miller Charles SCwe Plaintiff -vs- JUDGMENT Frances Miller —" Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and it being heard before Hon Dan H. Moore and a Jury at the August Term Superior Court 1952 for Iredell County, North Carolina, thefollowing issues were submitted to the Jury: l- Has the Plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for at least six (6) months next preceding the commencement of this action? 2- Were the plaintiff and defendant legally married, as alleged in the complaint? 3- Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fr two successive years next preceding the commencement of this action? The first issue was answered "YES", the second "YES", and the third "YES". THEREFORE, upon “otion of Robert H. Irvin, Attorney for the plaintiff, it is onered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant are dissolved. This tle kth.day of August 1952. Dan K, Moore “JUDGE PRESIDING =——N “Ke OK ‘NO. 5312 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled aswers the issues submitted to it as follows: James Dewey Kitchings, Mary Helen Kitchings NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY August Term 1952 James Dewey Kitchings, Plain tiff, Mary Helen Kitchings, | | Vs, j | } Defendant. 1. Did the plaintiff, James Dewey Kitchings, and the defendant, Mary Helen Kit chings, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 2. Have the plaintiff, James Dewey Kitchings, and the defendant, Mary Helen Kitchings, lived separate and apart from each other for two cmsecutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? AN SWE Yes ° 3. Has the plaintiff, James Dewey Kitchings, been a bma fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencemat of this action? ANSWER _ Yes . NORTH CAROLINA, In theSuperior Court August Term 1952 IREDELL COUNTY. James Dewey Kitchings, Plaintiff, JUDGMENT Mary Helen Kitchings, | ! Vs. | ! Defendant. | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor Dan K, Moore, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the August Term, 1952, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues having been submitted to, and answered by the jury, to-wit: i. Vid the plaintiff, James Dewey Kitchings, and the defendant, “ary Helen Kitchings, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER _ Yes ‘ ss _ 2s Have the plaintiff, James Dewey Kitchings, and the defendant, Mary Heles ; sonnet, lived separate and apart from each other for two cunsecutive years mmediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes e 3. Has the plaintiff, James Vewey Kitchings, been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina f . : to ior si In j miencemen this action? x months immediately preceding the com ANSWER _Yes__—sé, The Court finds that the summons in this action was duly served on the defen: ant, Mary Helen Kitchings, on the 20th day of June, 1952, by Zeb Nicholson, Deputy vheriff of Iredell County, mt North Carolina, by leaving a copy of the summon a copy of the complaint with the defendant. that the since The Court further finds from the affidavit filed by the plaintiff, defendant was not at the time of the institution of this action, has not been the institution of this action, and is not now in the military service of the . States of “merica,. 223 WW IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 The Court further finds that no children were born to the marriage union of the plaintiff and defendant in this action. IT 1S, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECR&ED, That the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defemant be, and they are dissolved, and that the plaintiff, James Dewey Kitchings, is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Mary Helen Kitchings. Let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff. This the 4th day of August, 1952. Dan K, Moore ~dudge Presiding se ose sw Uk oO se lke a OK S 3 % OK x wk OK MK MK OK ~~ OK DIVORCE ‘ The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: dio, 5313 Ellen Beaver ““oore vs James Loyd Moore NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY Ellen Beaver Moore Plaintiff ISSUES -vs- Janes Loyd Moore Defendant. l. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, Complaint? A, _ Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the st for six months next preceding the bring A, Yes 3+ Have the plaintiff and defendant lived se action? for two years for two years immediately preceding the bringing of this A, Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Ellen Beaver Moore i Plaintiff ; \( Defendant. 1 Janes Loyd Moore g heard before his Honor Dan K. This cause coming on to be heard, and bein t as alleged in the ate o.' North Carolina ine of this action, as alleged in the complaint? 9% parate and apart from each other A x ——d ee > ate teal ace ed — SS SSS Se Se ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECO ND WEEK AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 Moore, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, at the August Term of the Iredell County Superior Court, the following issues were submitted to and found by the Jury: 1. Were theplaintiff and defendant married to each other, as alleged in the Complaint? A. Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolin for six months next preceding the bringing of this action, as alleged inthe Complain: A. Yes. 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years immediately preceding the bringing ef this action, as alleged in the Complaint? A. Yes. IT IS, THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for the Plaintiff, ORDERED, CUNSIDERLD A.D ADJUDGED, that the b nds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, be, and the same are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the plaintiff pay the costs ofthis action, to be taxed by the Vlerk, Dan K, “oore Judge Presiding. Statesville, N.C, August 4th, 1952, DIVORCE oni The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn it empanelled answers the issues submitted to as follows: Wo. 5316 James R, Vampbell V8 Matoka Christopher Campbell NOXTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT LREDZLL COUNTY James Rk. Campbell Piaintire, VS. Matoka Christopher Campbell, Defendant, ; ipa 1. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Care) for at least six months next Answer: yes 26 preceding the institution of this action? the Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged +” complaint? Answer: yes m Leu IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 3, Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each ther for two years prior to the institution of this action? 0 Answer: i ali dihdiaaes wort CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY James R, Campbell, Plaintiff, JUDGMENT atoka Vhristopher Campbell, Defendant. ! | vs. ! | | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Dan kK. Moore, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the August, 1952, term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been properly served with summons as provided for by law, and that she has filed answer by her regu- larly appointed guardian ad litem, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by theCourt, NOW, THEREFORE, upon motion of Land, Sowers & avery, attorneys for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, James R. Campbell, be, and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, hatoka Christopher Campbell, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 4 day of August, 1952. Dan K, Mogre _ Judge Presiding oxnxnunxnneee eR K KK HH HK NS SS Re eee _ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT —_—_— — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ee ae AUGUST TERM, 1952 SECOMD WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 onday, August 4, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 , Sn a aaenaaeadinsadeneceall 3 REAR GEIS OO 'No. 5276 : 527 jeed from the said Margaret Ann Hines and others, on February 21, 1936, conveying WORTH CAROLINA i THE SUPERIOR COURT the lands as described in paragraph 4. of the Complaint in this cause of action; i IREDELL COUNTY | and, gs li It further appearing to the Court that the defendant J. H. Hines, and aS = Sn a cea cat Sarah E. Christopher Plaintiff defendant : Sooo ota nee nk oe LN nti AT eS VS. s Annie Mae Hines Bost, and husband Lewis E. Bost, and Hubert L. Hines ' and wife Joyce N. Hines, children of J. H, Hines and their respective husband and | J. H. Hines (widower) | wife, claim an interest or estate in the lands described in the complaint herein, Ta, eee Annie Mae Hines Bost and ~eoantantateamaaaiianiaiiiciamniiiaaaanin tn ais ‘ i } ih ae | i husband, Lewis E. Bost, and i aT iy Hubert L. Hines and wife, and such claim is 4 cloud on the title of the plaintiff; and i A me alt Joyce N, Hines, ISSUES ee Ne i ; Defendants It further appearing to the Court and the Vourt finding as a fact that the | mea! ti Tae j Fs Gefendants' claims of title are unfounded and that the defendants have no right : ih mat 1. At the time of the execution of the deed from Margaret Ann Hines, and : Hi Hii Pat Hy 7 : : . ae Basil i| . title, interest, property or estate in said lands and that the plaintiff, Sarah E, ate | i, aii | | others, on February 21, 1936, conveying the lands as described in Paragraph h,. of th i at Mh | Complaint i . ; Christopher is the owner of said land in fee simple ami is entitled to immediate ih ' i . | i i plaint in this cause of action, had Margaret Ann Hines been abandoned for a Ai eRe at a: : ; : ° ait - i in ; period of several years by her husband, defendant J. H. Hines? possession thereof insofar as the defendants named herein are cmcerned; | i 4 ii } it | ANSWER: Yes It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that Mrs. Sarah E. Ciristopher a 4 WML Hh Bh a ; if Hil Hi i is the omer and is seized in fee simple and is entitled to the immediate 4 Mee | . 1. is Ce h i “ He Vi NORTH CAROLINA | possession of all of the lands as described in paragraph 4. of the complaint of the he mya, " IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BY |) ii . Ni | — action herein, free from any claim of the defendants, J. H. Hines, Annie hae Hines i | Aah Bost L i J N. Himes, and . | | eh Sarah E. Christopher, ' ost and husband Lewis E. Bost, and Hubert L. Hines and wife, Joyce imes, | | | I Plaintiff 7 their heirs or assigns; and | | | Wa G ) . | V8~o i JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL AND INQUIRY It is further adjudged and decreed that the defendants hereinabove named have Hy) | ‘ } a ae | “ i, Hines (widower), no right, title, estate, interest or property in the lands hereinabove referred to. 1 Fee ese ae, Hines Bost and i ' hi ih hus ban ewis E, Bost This 4th i | lp Hubert L. Hines and ~~ 1 Pee ees ee it Pa) Joyce N. Hines, , Dan K, Moore Hi | | | t Defendants I Jadge Presidi ng. | yh | | | - i i, is Hm cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the Hr regular term of Ired ; ¢ . : ell Superior Court and a jury, upon motion by the plaintiff for a aa aaa | re) u ; . judgnent against the defendants by default final and inquiry; and, No | + 5061 Letha B Reynolds vs Lawrence V Reynelas eo---°-*""""""""""""" Continued It appearing t € to the Court that a duly verified complaint was filed and our dio, 4956 RNS] 1 A WR Battley, Admr of MG | oan vs Monroe Adams, attley, mr of M issued in th ’ this action on the 2&th day of April, 1952; and, Sloan, GGG aonnacaanccnce-sencennssnense ooro2eee Continued by Consent a It furth i er appearing to the Court that said summonses together with copies of said co mplaint were served on the defendants on the 29th day of April, 19525 r’ It further appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a fact that 0° i answers, demurrers o . ih r other pleadings have been filed by the defendants; and, ts , \ " * ee . — i me me ee oS ee EET ——— va eee aaers x DEER EE TS La, Teenie acannon : = Sad 9 - ht It further appearing to the Vourt that issue sub- the jury has answered the mitted to them i iy n favor of the plaintirr and against the defendants, 46 appears in the record, to $ ; . wit: that iargaret Ann Hines had been abandoned by her husbaly . defendant J. H. H i, ines for a period of several years prior to the execution of the ne EN ee ees etheke-wlb. oom IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Monday, August 4, 1952 Ino. 5111 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Lonnie G. Goforth Plaintiff JUDGMENT Franklin Sigmon Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Dan kK, Moore, Judge Presiding at the July-August, 1952 term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel for both parties to this action that all matters of controversy set out in the plead- ings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendant haa agreed to pay to the plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of TWO HUNDii)- FIFTY-SIX AND 89/100 DOLLARS and the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction thereof; Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of TWO HUNDRED - FIFTY-SIX All 89/100 ($256.89) Dollars and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 4 day of Aug., 1952. Dan K, Moore rules Presiding Consent: Finch & Chamblee F, G, Chamblee Attorneys for Plaintif? Hugh G, Mitchell Attorney for Defendant we KK we Ke mw me ke me ke ok kk Kk Om \No. 4814 In the Matter of the Prob ! Jury Sworn and empanelled as follows: H. T. Waller, In Solemn Form of — ovate} Mrs Katie Lee Terry, H B Lanier, V L Wagner, = Todd A, Summers’ Will Link, Harold Crawford, M L Davis, 0 A Stutts, Bar! ; ¥ Blam, R li Hartline, C L Bustle and Mrs 5 0'Holses Pending trial of this case the vourt takes recess until Tuesday Morning. Thi 5 S Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, August >, 1 at 9:30 o'clock A, M, Le C Poor IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK AUGUST TERM, 1952 Tuesday, August 5th, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. INoe 17h1, 1742 & 1746 SPEEDING: RECKLESS DRIVING: SPEEDING state The judgment heretofore entered on July 29, vs 1952 is hereby stricken out and the following J, W. Davis judgment entered in lieu thereof: (228 In #1741, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIXTY (60) DaYS, to be assigned to work in or about the County premises under the supavision and direction of the High Sheriff of lredell County. In #1742, Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIXTY (60) DaYS, to be assigned to work in or about the County premises under the supervision and direction of the High Sheriff of Iredell County. This sentence is to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed in #1741. In #1746, Judgment of the vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIXTY (60) DAYS, to be assigned to work in or about the County premises under the supervision and direction of the High Sheriff of Iredell county. This sentence is to begin at the expiration of the sentences imposed in #1741 and #1742. et et De PE pet ee OS dio, 1697 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY State The Judgment heretofore entered on August l, = 1952 is hereby stricken out and the following Janes Currence judgment entered in lieu thereof: 19 Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) ONTHS, to be assigned to work in and around the County Home or Farm under the supervision of the Superintendent thereof. Wo. 4814 In the hatter of the Probate Pending trial of this case the court takes a solemn form of recess until Wednesday Morning. d A, Summers’ Will This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, August 6th, 1952, E P at 9:30 o'clock A, M. at 9:30 o'clock A. M. YNo. 4814 In the Matter of the Probate In Solemn Form of Todd A. Summers’ Will This H onorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, August 7, 195% at 9:30 o'clock A, M, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Wednesday, August 6, 1952 This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning ’ This case is resumed for trial Pending trial in this case, Court recess until Thursday Morning. takes a JUDGE PRESIDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -----= AUGUST TERM, 1952 Thursday, August 7, 1952 {his Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Thursday Morning, at 9:30 o'clock, A. M. No, 5279 | DIVORCE , Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Arthur Mitchell, E O Cloaninger, Victor Crosby, Mrs J tle Bell Fred Lit Ralph Montgomery, R B Kestler, Jr, RC ne Vs. ‘ Gili Millsaps, R’S Sharpe, G ¢ Jordon, John Nae Miller Bell Ford, NE Brown and John RicConnell ’ : ORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 1952 fred Little Bell, Plaintiff Vs. ISSUES Nae Miller Bell, Defendant 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: __yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: _ yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: yes NURTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 1952 fred Little Bell, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT "ae Miller Bell, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of theSuperior Yourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Van K, Moore, Judge C Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is » therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of “atrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Fred Little Bell, ent the , *fendant, Mae Miller Bell, be and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is &ran ted an absolute divorce from the defendant. udge Presiding eeaekenae ee ee ee Re OR OH HH = (SSS SS ae Se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Thursday, August 7, 1952 JNo. 4814 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. AUGUST TERM, 1952 In the Matter of the Probate | in Solemn Form of Todd A. \ ISSUES. Summers' Will. q 1. Was the paper-writing propounded, dated the 14th day of October, 1948, executed by Todd A. Summers, according to the formalities of law required to make a valid last will and testament? Answer: yes 2. At the time of signing and executing said paper-writing did said Todd A, Summers have sufficient mental capacity to make and execute a valid last will and testament? Answer: no 3. Is the said paper-writing referred to in Issue No. 1, propounded in this cause, and every part thereof, the last will and testament of Todd A. Summers, deceased? Answer: no IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Thursday, August 7, 1952 /No. 1610 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL DOCKET NO. 1610 State of North Carolina ORDER REVOKING PROBATION | | Earl D. Southern, Jr. | . Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard at the July 28, 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior Court before the undersigned Judge on the under- signed date, being held in the City of Statesville, County of Iredell, North Carolina, upon the report of State Probation Officer Lacy W. Blue, te defendant being in Court in person WHEREUPON th« Court finds the following facts: 1. That at the November 6, 1951 Term of Iredell County Superior Court, Statesville, N. C. the defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere to the crime of Larceny and was sentenced by the Honorable H. Hoyle Sink to serve Eighteen Mos. in jail, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission of North Carolina, which sentence was suspended and the defendant placed on probation for a period of Two Years under the supervision of the North Carolina Probation Commission and its Officers under the general conditions of the probation judgment and the following special conditions: that he be allowed to return to Pulaskie in the State of Virginia under t..e reciprocal Probation rule. 2. The above named defendant has wilfully violated the following conditions of probation: (a) He has violated condition e. in that he has failed to work faith- fully at suitable employment. (bo) He has violated condition j. which states that he not violate any penal law of any state or the Federal Government and be of general good behavior, in that on February 29, 1952 in the Trial Justice Court of Pulaskie County, Virginia he was fined $15.00 for Disorderly Conduct. On this occasion, he had used abusive and profane language to his father. After disposal of this case, defendant returned hom up his father, Again during the month of March he beat up his father, this time knocking - —, Stomping on him and leaving scars on his arms 28 a result of this eating, On April 2 fendant was arrested and given a hearing in the Trial Justice i Puleskie County, Virginia for Disturbing the Peace and threatening to do his father bodily harm. At this time, the Court decreed st00 that he post a $500.00 peace bond or serve Six Months in jail, defendant faile to post the bond and served the sentence. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED,AND DECREED that the probation be and e and physically beat is hereby REVOKED amd the sentence heretofore suspended of Eighteen Mos. in Jail, to be assigned to work under the supervision of North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission is ordered into effect. This the 7 day of August, 1952. Dan K, Moor eek eh eee KH H win Raia IN THE SUPEREOR COURT | cc ee Te rep SECOND WEEK AUGUST TERM, 1 ai » 1952 ECOND WEEK ----<= AUGUST TERM, 1952 ae ' Thursday, August 7; 1952 S Friday, August 8, 1952 , 99 “No. 5028 {nig Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Friday Morning, Moldply Corporation at 9:30 o'clock ye vs. Home Made Chair Co. MURDER ; : ee : Mos 2729 The judgment heretofore entered is hereby What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? 8 stricken out and in lieu thereof the following ow Ardis is substituted: Answer: $500.00. Robert The Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison at hard labor for a term of not less than EIGHT nor more than TWELVE YEARS. No. 481) NORTH CAROLINA, In theSuperior Court August Term 1952 IREDELL COUNTY In the Matter of the Probate of | the Will of Todd A. Summers, JUDGMENT Deceased, in Solemn Form. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at tne August Term 1952 Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing that this proceeding was commenced by the American Trust Company filing a petition to probate the purported will of Todd A, Summers, deceased, in solemn form, and to which proceeding Mrs, Elsie Summers Hall, one of the heirs at law of Todd A. Summers, deceased, filed a Caveat, and in which proceeding Mitchell College became a party and adopted the petition and amended petition filed by American Trust Company, and that the Anerican Trust Company and Mitchell College were propounders in this proceeding; And it further appearing to the Court that all of the necessary. parties, including all of the beneficiaries under the purported will of Todd A. Summers, and all of the heirs andmext of kin of Todd A. Summers, have been duly and Properly served with citations as required by law, and are now before the Court, and a jury having been duly selected and empanelled, and the following issues having been submitted to the jury and by the jury answered as follows: "1. Was the paper-writing propounded , dated the 14th day of October, — executed by Todd A, Summers, according to the formalities of law required to € a valid last will and testament? This Answer: Yes Honorable Court tak 2 es a recess until Friday Morning, August 8, 195% os aid at 9:30 o'clock A, M, Todd A a At the time of signing and executing said pene ws ies ae fees vill ‘ine face have sufficient mental capacity to make and execu estament? An Swer: no propounded in 3. Is the said paper-writing referred to in Issue No. l, nie, de Todd deceasedy and every part thereof, the last will and testament of Answer ; no " IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK -----=- AUGUST TERM, 1952 \ | iE | att | HT | Friday, August 8, 1952 Friday, August 8, 1952 ti | Wh AH ti TD | That there is hereto attached to this Judgment the petition to probate fio. 5028 ql | ii { the will of Todd A. Summers in solemn form, the amended petition, order extending ORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. i ! i H i : . i i if | | time to plead, caveat, the citations issued with the return of the Sheriff thereto, IREDELL COUNTY. HH 1 it | the affidavit in regard to thepublication of the citations in the Statesville Yoldply Corporation, | | Hi bi a Hi WA it yy Daily Record, the motion and order for the appointment of a guardian ad litem vs. | JUDGMENT. il | I Hi for the minors and unborn children, and answer of Hugh G, Mitchell, Guardian ig Home Made Chair Company. : i it} Litem, the petition of Mitchell College, and the order permitting Mitchell College at . nt to adopt the petition and amended petition of the American Trust Company and join This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Dan K. Moore, i ° : : : C t ei ; ai | as one of the propounders, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the August Term, 1952, of the Superior Vvour i rh : } URE it iF NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the following issue was | If) | hi | 1. That the paper writing dated the 14th day of October, 1948, propounded submitted to the jury and answered as shown thereon: it iH | by the propounders in this proceeding and purporting to be the last will and testa "What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entit led to recover Tae Way of the defendant by reason of this action’ ‘I i i | ment of Todd A. Sum deceased, b nd th ame is hereby declared and adjudged A amers, sed, be, a e same is hereby judg Answer: $500.00." | not to be the last will and testament of Todd A. Summers, deceased, and the sane is NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the Court h i t ny Oe Sele Oe eS Sey a ee eee that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $500.00, with 2. That the purported probate in Common form, dated the 26th day of July . By 1: oe . : interest thereon from the 7th day of August, 1952, together with the cost of Hf i A | 1949, and the affidavit of the attesting witnesses, W. R. Battley and R. M. Laseny, i iS} i, this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, * be, and the same is hereby cancelled, set aside and declared null and void, and of This the 7th day of August, 1952. ii no effect whatsoever, Dan K, Koore ct Pal s . 3. That the petition, amended petition, caveat, answer of the Guardia Judge Pre ng . Ad Litem, citations, and the return thereon, as hereinabove referred toand attache to this Judgment, be recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Wo, 5028 Iredell County, together with this Judgment and the issues of the jury in this NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. proceeding, IREDELL COUNTY. 4, It is further ordered that the cost of this action be taxed against ares of Moldply Corporation, j ii the Estate of Todd A. Summers, deceased, including expert witness fee of $35. @ Vs, i ORDER. | mileage for Dr. Douglas Glasgow. =~s=+=-= ia Home Made Chair Company. ! Ve This the 8th day of August, 1952, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Dan e Judge Prestiine K, Moore, Judge Presiding, at the August, 1952, Term of the Superior Court of ie ed ! Iredell County, and @ jury, and it appearing to the Court that the parties agre | to said jury Propounders, American Trust Co. and Mitchell College, move to set aside the verdict & for a new trial, ct & eset Motion denied. Exception. Propounders obJe that the Court might instruct the jury to answer the issue submitted to the Judgment & the signing of the judgment & give notice of appeal to Sup! Court of North Carolina, in the fount of $500.00, and that, as a further consideration, the parties agreed Furth rs allowed t hich remains er notice waived. By consent, propounde hat the defendant would return to the plaintiff all the bent plywood w v $0 25 days to prepare & serve case on apveal, caveators allowed 10 days thereafter purchased by the defendant fil in the Possession of the defendant from the 747 panels } ile exceptions on co 1 ; ee from the plaintif’ on or about the 30th day of May, 1950, in its condition and 4n Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding ‘Re amount as stored in its warehouse on the 7th day of August, 1952; said bent *eeCKR ER ER RR Re ee oO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----<- AUGUST TERM, 1952 Friday, Ayrust 8, 1952 plywood to be returned within five days from this date: Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered that the defendant, within five days from this date, return to the plaintiff all of the unused bent plywood panels remaining in the possession of the defendant from the 747 panels purchase by the defendant from the plaintiff on or about the 30th day of May, 1950; saiq bent plywood to be delivered to Crown Chair and Lounge Company, 646 Armfield St, Statesville, N. C. This the 7th day of August, 1952. Van K, Moore udge Presiding. By consent: J. G, Lewis F, G,. VUnamblee Attorneys for Plaintiff. CG. 3. winberry Buren Jurney Attorneys for Defendant. KORO RK KK kK Kk % No. 5128 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY C. F. Moose, Administrator of the Estate of Ralph G, Moose, deceased, vs. I I Plaintiff j j ORDER Southern Railway Company, | | Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before, His Honor, Da K. Moore, Judge Presiding at the July 1952 term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon the motion of the plaintiff filed in this cause praying that he be permitted to amend his complaint; and it appearing to the Court that certail matters and facts have come to the knowledge of the plaintiff since he filed his , : $ complaint in this cause and that by reason of said new facts the plaintiff -_ to amend his camplaint with reference to said matters; and it appearing to ™ Court that motion Ought to be allowed: 2 5 Now, therefore, in the discretion of the Court, it is ordered, ad judged, . + . s t and decreed that the plaintiff in this cause be permitted to amend his compli? as set forth inhis motion; rved upon that the amendments to said complaint be sé the to answe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ AUGUST TERM, 1952 Friday, August 8, 1952 defendant, and that the defendant is hereby allowed 30 days after such service r said complaint as amended. This 8 day of August, 1952. Dan K, Moore dudge Buperior Court To the foregoing order the defendant excepts. io. 527h io. 5019 Hio. 4948 (No. 4849 iNo. 4975 ‘No, 5020 ‘No. 5023 “No. 5029 flo, 5098 ‘No. 5157 jMo. 5192 No. 5201 No. 5206 No, 5231 ‘No. 5235 lo, 5275 Dan K. Moore moe OK OK KK OK KK KK OK Daniel Lazenby vs Roxie Shives Lazenby ---------------------- Continued WC Campbell vs Charles Lynn Binkley ----------+----e----"e"= Continued Harry Brady vs Bahia M Fakoury T/A Bahia Shopp -------------- Continued Jennie S Queen vs WR Battley, Monroe Adams, Admrs M G Sloan~- Continued Universal Refining Products Co Inc vs W S Kit chings T/A Statesville Pack Co -------------nnnennnnnnn nnn nnn nnnnnn Continued Vance McBride vs William M Herrin e----------e-re 7 or errr nrnrnn Continued Ellis T Bailey T/A The Hudson Bailey Paint Co vs F ; Wm D Fox T/A The Mack Fox Paint Co q-<-<----<<eer enna Continued Mack R Walker vs Annie Mae Johnson <-<--------erers-eerrrrrr= Continued Prog 8 Cloaninger Jeutse,0,chpentngnyve Toy F Bristtit ____.. cominued A P Steadman vs D W Scott, L B Lyerly & L V Voggins --------- Continued Shaver Motor Co Ine et al vs Vity of Statesville -----------= Continued Parks Andrews McLean et al vs Town of Mooresville «---------= Continued James L Miller vs W Ross Day, Geo H Smith & Fred W Hudson --- Continued MT Pratt vs Comer Huffman ---------re meter ener mre Senn tanee John Clarence Smith vs Ernest ¥ Troutman -------="= Continued by Consent LB Skeen vs James W Atwell & James W Atwell, oP aneneneseee= Continued a ee eee neemeareramnee epeeinrertnmnrecnesen er ae —— esse ms ae ae nr ne te-Lne “ee pane ttnnmetnn tenant tae - wd ey arity | | ig mo} ; i 4 i ; ‘ a Thai, | t is + | ti bel : i} ‘ 1] i 1p rh ' i hie | | me a Aw | “IN | THE SUPERIOR COURT SECO! D WEEK o--<- AUGUST TeRM, 1952 Friday, August 8, 1952 INo. 5182 Ili SUPEATOR COURT eal ' ' TAY TA NORTH YAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ~~ Je MN. Poole, Plaintiff, JUDGHE — = 3 VSe Ldgar i.nox, ~——s iis cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His lionor, Dan «. iwore, Judge Presiding at the July Term, 1952, and it appearing to matters of controversy set out in the pleadings 1:ave been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendant has ree to t plaintiff, and the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of 1330.00, and the cost of this action in full accord and satisfaction; WW YHEREFORE, by consent it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed e plaintiff have recover of the defendant tie sum of $330.00, and the costs of this actio 0 saxed b e vlerk. Dan i., i.core ae EE | ; Judg Presiding « u Superior Court of Iredell County "9 , diovsd LU5 uu ae vow . Vvory 0 ‘ ~~ . one ly IR x. - --—_—_—_- swecuorneys ior Wl Hugh ¢ G, Mitchell comeya for Veicndant. his udrar x inox mork Vefendant JUDGE PRESIDING uly 19 952 term No. 5325 yoRTH CAROLINA ‘i IREDELL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT , Wilson, Trading and doing ta as the | Jilson Service Station, Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. Yrs, Erlene Shaver, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable Carl G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court, of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 7th day of July, 1952; And it further appearing to the Court that said summons together with a copy a of said complaint were served on the defendant on the Sth day of July, 1952; And it further appearing to the court tuat no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within wich pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that tne cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay @ Sul of money Two Hundred fifty two dollars and forty fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of three cents (3252.43), with interest thereon from the 15ta day of May, 1952; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed tiat the plaintiff have and recover oi' the defendant the sum of Two Hundred fifty two dollars and forty tn, ° . . ’ aa he g av ‘ Vaw Os . gd three cents ($252.43), with interest thereon from the 15th day of May, 1952; and “W@ Costs of this action. This the &th day of Aurust, 1952. CC. G. Smith - Tierk of theSuperior Yourt Iredell County ~ Cr nt eee oe NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY P, A. Cox and C, V. Davis, ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. JUDGMEN J. S. Vernon, John Johnson, , ) and Ben Conger, J. Hub liller, Trading as Conger & Miller, J. H. ) Rickert and Statesville Gin Company, John T, Gili, Manager, ) Defendants. ) This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G,. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, ypon the motion be the plaintiffs for judgment against the defendant, J. S. Vernon, by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed am Summons issued on the 24th day of June, 1952; An ; - } “y 4 } ‘ “ . . . ind it further appearing to the Court that said summons together with a nV ent ‘ - + : copy of said complaint was served on the defendant, J. S. Vernon, on the 4th day of July, 1952; And it furthe * ‘ a3 . a4 : ; vner appearing to the Vourt that no answer, demurrer or otner pleading has been fi] by e fe I g I i filed by the defendant, J. S, Vernon, and no extension of time for filing ov] tim } € pleading has been granted, and that the time within which pleading may be filed has expired; 4nd it furth ing ; further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of acti i > th on consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sul of money fix he sai y tixed by the said contract, namely, the sum of $1,800.00, with interest from Septenber 1952; And it furt! s : further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the plaintiffs claim ti ig } le right to the possession of the cows, calves, heifers, hans shoulders and middlines. ; “ings, in order that he may sell the same as provided in 4 certain chattel mortear rtgare executed by the defendant, J. S. Vernon, and and that ancilliary to this i } acti int if tion plaintiffs caused to be executed claim and deliver) papers for said prop , } property and thereunder now have the same in their possessions g have Mtper it is or< ‘ is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff and recover of the defendant, J. 3, Vernon, the sum of ~1,800.00 with interest thereon from Sentem ptember, 1952, and that they be declared in title to the possessi™ , a of the said property; and that Isaac T ed ¢ Avery, dJr., be, and he is hereby appoint Commissioner t =n © sell t} the same as by] aw x : sntiffs J rovided, and to pay to the plain the amount received therefor, less ti o be ‘e legal costa said sale, which is % ed by the plaintiffs upon the monetary judgment rendered herein, and that credit the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, J. S. Vernon, the coasts of this action, This the 13 day of August, 1952. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court j -A No. 5343 COB 415 page 481 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT: IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, *LORIDA. N CHANCERY. CASE NO. 71520- JES FRANKLIN HENDERSON, Plaintiff, FILED JUN 11 1948 -vVSs- Leonard W. Thomas Clerk Circuit Court LAURA LOUISE HENDERSON, FINAL DECREE This cause came on to be heard on tne record and file herein and the testimony taken before the Special Master appointed by this vourt ana upon his findings and recommendations ani the Court finding taat this vourt has juridisetion of said cause and of tue parties tereto and that the equities of the defendant and the Court said cause are in favor of the plaintiff and against ta beingfully advised in the premises, it is, upon consideration thereof, ORDERED, AVJUDGED AD DECREED as follows: 1. That the report of the Special Master herein, his findings and recommendations are hereby ap roved and confirmed in all respects. 2. That the plaintiff, J.ts FRANKLIN HENDERSON, be, and he is hereby, divorced of and from the defendant, LaURA LOUISE HENDERSON, a viuculo matrimonii, and the bonds of matrimony now and heretofore existing between Plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby, forever dissolved. 3. That the stipulation of separation agreement entered into b } : 1 £ ‘ ; eed *tween the respective parties and filed in evidence herein as plaintiff's “hibit #1, be and the same is hereby, approved and confirmed in all respects, and in accordance therewith that deed of plaintiff conveying the real estate in 0 . tony Point, Alexander County, North Carolina, owned by said parties, to said defendant for her lifetime and at her death to the minor children of said parties a * @ vested remainder in fee simple and acknowledgement that all household and ki tchen furniture and other personal property situate in the home on the real estate aforesaid shall belong to said defendant and provision for lump sun paynent of Two Hundred (200,00) Dollars heretofore made by the plaintiff to the defendan are hereby approved and confirmed. Further in accordance with said stipulation, it is hereby further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, LAURA LOUISE HENDERSON be, and she is hereby, awarded the sold and exclusive custody of the three minor children of the parties, WIL: IAM RAY HSNDERSON, SHIRLEY LOUISE HENDERSON and JANICE MaupE HENDERSON, with the right reserved to the plaintiff to visit said children at all reasonable times. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed, in accordance with said stipulation, that the plaintiff shall pay to the defendant for her support and maintenance and the maintenance and support of the three minor children aforesaid the sum of Fifty (350.00) Dollars a month, com.:.encing as of December 1, 1947, and payable on the lst day oi each and every month thereafter up to and in- cluding the lst day of augus., 195k. DUNE AND JRDERED in Chambers at Jacksonville, Vuval County, Florida, this 11 day of June, A. D., 1948. Claude Meet’ STATE OF FLORIDA, JOUNTY OF DUVAL. I, LEONARD W. THOMAS, Clerk of te Circuit Court, Duval County, "lorida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the F3 | as £ . } é inal Decree of Jivorce in the case of JAWES FRANKLIN HENDERSON vs. LAURA LOUISE HENDERSON he sane ay SXSON as the same appears recorded in Chancery Order Book 415 at page 461 of tne current public records of Duval County, Florida. Witness my hand and seal of office at Jacksonville, Florida, this the 4th day of August A, D, 1952 LEUNARD W. THOMAS, CLERK CIRCUIT cova. By J. G,. Travis —— Deputy VUlerk. (SAL) — —V7-_ File ; } as * din the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for on County of I y redell. State of North Carolina on the 7th day of August A- D, 1952 a recorded in Book M4 ok 30 of Minute Docket, Superior Court, at page 243 Public records of said county, L, L +t, Nesbit — eputy Clerk Moe 1481 State vs George Fraley Mahaffey To all who shall see these presents--GREETING: WHEREAS, George Fraley Mahaffey at the May Term, one thousand nine hundred and fifty-one ssession of Non-lax Paid Whiskey, Speeding and Reckless Driving and by judgment of the Superior Court af Iredell County, was convicted of Unlawful Po of said Court sentenced to twelve months on the roads, suspended for a period of three years on the following conditions: 1. That the defendant shall be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State. 2, That he shall not have and possess at any time during said period any quantity of tax-paid or non-tax paid whiskey or alcoholic beverages of any kind of description whatsoever. 3. that he shall not operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways of North Carolina fora period of two years. AND WHEREAS, It has been made to appear to me that the case is one fit for the exercise of Executive clemency: NOW THEREFORE, I, W. Kerr Scott, Governor wf the State ot North Carolina, in consideration of the premises, and by virtue of the power and authority in me vested by the Constitution of the State, do by these presents COMMUTE THE SAID SENTENCE TO twelve months on the roads suspended for a period of three years on the following conditions: 1. That the defendant shall be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State. 2. ‘hat he shall not have or possess at any time during saidperiod any quantity of tax paid or non-tax paid whiskey or alcoholic beverages of any kind or description whatsoever. 3. That he shall not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways of the State for a period of one year, two months and twenty-five days, upon the condition that this commutation shall not extend to any other offense whereof the said George Fraley Mahaffey may be guilty. IN WITNESS WHEREUF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State to be affixed. Done at our City of Raleigh, this 18th day of A Ugust, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and fifty-two, and in t he one hundred and seventy-seven year of our American Independence.. Ww, Kerr Sco Governor 4, F. Rang Vomtsstones oI -Parcles— kee KK RK KK OK eR KO i a te . i = ‘ 4 oe. 7 mn S ee ee ee JAlo. 5237 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Fred J. Ostwalt vs JUDGMENT Mayor Lee Ledford This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued on February 21, 1952 and returned not served, and if further appearing that an alias summons was issued on May 21, 1952 and that said alias was returned not served, that the time for issueing a pluries summons has expired and that the defendant has not been served and is not in court; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be an the same is hereby dismissed and the plaintiff taxed with the cost. This the 3rd day of September, 1952. C., G. Smith Clerk Superior Court mw wwe we we Ke me mK me he me me me No. 5261 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Leonard's Incorporated vs JUDGMENT Mary .lice Gaither King { | Marvin King, and wife i a | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that Sumuons was issued on April 3, 1952 and returned not served, and it further appearing that an alias summons was issued on May 21, 1952 and that said alias ¥ returned not served, that the time for issueing a pluries summons has expired and that the defendant has not been served and is not in court; It is, therefore, ordered am adjudged by the Vourt that this action be and the same is hereby dismissed and the plaintiff taxed with the cost. This the 3rd day of September, 1952. ctor seis Court i ee ee ee Mo. 5333 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Statesville Industrial Bank, Inc., Plaintiff, JUDGMENT Ww, T. Jones, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that service of summons was never served upon the defendant, and that the defendant is not in Court; and it being made further to appear to the Court that since the institution of this action that the defendant has come in and paid the plaintiff the amounts demanded in this action; and that the plaintiff has asked that he be allowed to take a nom-suit; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, adjudged and decreed, upon the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be, and it is hereby allowed to take a non-suit in this action, and the plaintiff is non-suited. This, the 5 day of September, 1952. C, G, Smith Clerk of superior Vourt xee eK ROK x No. 5271 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT H. H. Yount, et al T/A Tredel] Finance il JUDGMENT vs Donald 0. Mayhew This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned “lerk Superior Court and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued on ‘Pril 12, 1952 and that said summons was executed on April 12, 1952, but that the Sherift' g return shows that he did not take possession of the property set out in the affidavit of the Plaintiff and that the matter has been settled between the parties; It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be and th * Same is hereby non-suited and the Plaintiff taxed with the cost. This the sth day of September, 1952. U. Gy Smith Clerk Superior Court Ke KK OK OK KR OK Rm a = ‘ , ats b 4 = Bs a . . . — S ~ Pei ° ss Se ae a eS ae ; = = 7 = és ie > ~ a Sa na > —— — od No. 4,587 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Co Before the Clerk Alexander Film Company, A Corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NoNsur? James A, Peeler and Mrs. James A. Peeler, Partners trading and doing business as Julie's, Statesville, North Carolina, and Julie's or Julie's Shop, Kannapolis, North Carolina, Defer ant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersimed Clerk of theSuperior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit: IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of Vourt. This the 30th day of August, 1952. UG. G,. Smith Clerk of Superior court of Tredell County, North Carolina. CONS&NTED TO: Adams, Dearman ami Winberr Attomeys for the Plaintif?’ BY: UC, B. Winberry TUS eee eeneeannenenense ts Ko. 666 In the Superior Vourt Before the Clerk NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. J, Ae & Me Be Kelly Company, @ Vorporation, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Janes %. Peeler, partners, trading and doing business as Julie's, Statesville, \orth Carolina, and Julie's or Sulie's Shop, Kannapolis, i i j ! Mrs. James A. Peeler and husband, | North Carolina, | I Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the under-= signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Vourt from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit: IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of Court. This the 30th day of August, 1952. C, G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iedell County North Carolina. CONSENTED TO: Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, BY: _C, B, Winberry sekeeeenene eke ee eH Ss ie ~ SF a ———— tee OR Seo Pe, racine SS Mo. 5255 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court Before the Clerk Home Made Chair Company, a j Corporation, Plaintiff, ! j FINAL JUDGMENT vs. LT ¢. E, Vernon and wife, Mrs, C. E. Vernon, | Defendants, j This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 6th day of vept., 1952, on motion on Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: ole That on March 27, 1952, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, ~Z= That of Iredell County, and was returnable as probided by kw. -3- That the summons was Served on the defendants, C, E. Vernon and wife, Mrs. C, E, Vernon, by W. R, Cook, Deputy Sheriff of Davie County, on March 29, 1952, by leaving with the defendants a copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complant. A ~Le- That no answer, demurrer or other pleading has been filed by the defendants, and that no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted, - that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired. ~5— Th i hat the plaintiff's cause of action is on a written promissory note executed by the defendants to the plaintiff under Seal, in the amount of Fifteen Hundred Dollars ($1500.00) , dated January 18, 1949, due six months after date, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from date until pest ~6- Tha t the plaintirr exhibited the promissory note sued on in this “— to th d C S - o the undersigned Clerk of the “uperior Court of Iredell County, and the " that no payments have been made there due and unpaid finds is past on and that the aforesaid note and ’ that there is now due and owing to the plaintiff by the Summons was issued from this Vourt on March 27, 1952, to the Sheriff dants on the aforesaid note the total principal sum of Fifteen Hundred defen Dollars ($1500.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 18, 1949, until paid. oJe That the note sued on in this action and exhibited to the Court has been marked that judgment has been obtained thereon, and the same has been attached to this judgment. IT IS THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, That the plaintiff recover of the defendants, C. E, Vernon and wife, Mrs. C. E. Vernon, and each of them, jointly and severally, the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars $1500.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 18, 1949 until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 6th day of Sept., 1952. C, G, Smith . Ulerk of Superior Yourt of Iredell County KR KK HK KK OK OK KK KK No. 5095 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY, In the Superior vourt Before the Clerk William A, Cathey, Ruth H. Cathey and Robert T, Hoyle, Partners, trading and doing business as a Partnership under the firm name and style of Vathey-Hoyle Company, FINAL JUDGMENT Vs. | 1 | Plaintiffs, | i Robert L, Page, j i Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Varolina, on this 6th day of September, 1952, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiffs, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Vourt; ale That on July 3, 1951, the plaintiffs filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action with the Clerk of the Suverior Vourt of Iredell County, yf Ag / PNT tok i | | ae oa That summons was issued from this Vourt on July 3, 1951, to the Sherifs of Alamance County, and was returnable as provided by law. -3< That the summons was served on the defendant, Robert L, Page, by x, pF, Warren, Deputy Sheriff of Alamance Vounty, on July 10, 1951, by leaving with tr defendant a copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint, ole That no answer, demurrer or other pleading has been filed by the defendant, and that no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted, and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired. =5e That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiffs demands a sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant tomy a certain sum therefor; that an itemized verified statement, marked "Exhibit A," was attached to, and made a part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the transaction. -6= That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemised verified statement attached to the complaint and marked "Exhibit A", that at the time of the institution of this action the defendant was due and owing to the plaintiffs, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shon in the plaintiffs' statement marked "Exhibit A", the principal sum of Five Hundred Sevetty: five Dollars ($575.00), together with interest thereon from the 10th day of Nove, 1949, at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid. oe That since the institution of this action, the defendant has paid a tot of One Hundred Seventy-five Dollars ($175.00), the same being paid on the followin dates: August 7, 1951, 12.50; August 11, 1951, $12.50; September 1, 1951, $12.50; September 5, 1951, $12.50; September 18, 1951, $25.00; September 24, 1951, 3." Oct ° ctober 1, 1951, $12.50; October 15, 1951, $12.50; October 30, 1951, $12.59} November 14, 1951, $12.50; November 26, 1951 , $12.50; January 7, 1952, $12-59 January 21, 1952, $12.50, @8e That th e Court finds that after the aforesaid payments are duly credit that the defendant is now due and owing to the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiffs' statemmt marked "Exhibit 4", the sum of Four Hundred Seventy-three Dollars Thirteen Cents ($473.13), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 21, 1952, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, Robert L. Page, the sum of Four Hundred Seventy-three Dollars Thirteen Cents ($473.13), togetner with interest thereor at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 21, 1952, until paid. This the 6 day of September, 1952. GC. G, Smith Clerk of superior vourt of Iredell County. me we ROK KR OKO wR KK KK OK OK OK JNo. 5332 North Carolina | Iredell County In the Superior Court, Before the Ulerk. Statesville Flour Millis vompany, Plaintiff, vs Fred Lowrance, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Vourt that this action was instituted in this court on the 2lst day of July, 1952, and that Summons and complaint were served on the defendant on the 26th day of July, 1952; that the action was brought for the recovery of a stated account in the amount of $687.75 due by the defendant to the plaintiff and that said account became past due on the 24th day of November, 1950; And it further appearing to the vourt that the defendant has failed to answer or demur to the complaint or otherwise plead and that the plaintits 5s entitled to a judgment by default final; adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover 1950, until It is, therefore, ordered, of the defendant the sum of $687.75, with interest from November 24, Paid. The defendant is taxed with the costs of this action. This the 9th day of Sept. 1952. CG. G, Smith Clerk Superior Vourt Reha Kk KHER RR OK HM ible CRT LE a a MA ABUT ot GL ead pha ten 1 H yh i Ihe PY 4 iL He 1 eae) /N0. 5061 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court No. 4756 NORTH CAROLINA, a a a a ore the Cler Before the Ulerk IREDELL COUNTY. IREDELL COUNTY. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Hie id ! d Reynolds i Atlas Toy Company, a corporation, I Letha Benfield Keyn ’ | i Plaintiff, I | — Vs | JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT 4 . — |} i i) Vs JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUT? Lawrence Vernell Raynolds, | That Howard P, Montgomery, an individual Ra i trading under the name and style of A Defendant. ! | s A M, & H. Wholesale a’ ane Zomaed P i ; Hla P, Montgomery and Louis W. MacKesson, Jr. ‘ D —" a Wid Partners, trading and doing business under | It appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Vearma ‘ HiLh the partnership name of M, & H. Wholesale i ke a ‘ tif Jompany, | Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff desires to take | 3 H) i Hl) Vefendants. nonsuit in this action: | a This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned FF untary nonsuit, and that this action be, and Sy Raa. soe plaintiff be allowed to take a vol Mh | slerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing the same is hereby nonsuited, and the plaintiff is taxed with the coste its B! : . Hi to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for This the 6th day of September, 1952. F ee : bf the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been ny oat 4 settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non- we rior Court of Iredell hi County au suit: IT IS, THEXeFORE, CONSIDERED, OXVSRED, ADJUDGED AWD DECREED, Upon motion of Consented to: Adams, Vearman and Wi : : : be Adams, Dearman & Winbe -=—— is, nd Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintifr, that the plaintiff Ttertaye for the pleine. or the plaintil?. nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, —— = = —> —~ —— eam —_- | and that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Ulerk of i 2 Meet de | HF ill Kttorney appointed by the Court tor | | il YOURS» the defendant, Lawrence Vernell 1 aynolds, who was serving in the | iH This the 30th day of August, 1952. armed forces. A] i U, G, Smith —s¥ Tredeli oust) I Clerk of Superior Court of irede North Carolina. SUNSENTED TO: Seen ek kee KH HH Adams, Dearman and Winber Attorneys for the Plaintif?’ By: Vb. Winberry Wm. I, Ward, Jr, Attorney for Defendants. SURE KHEKRER KERR HH KH OH alt / NO. 5104 Wo. 5342 | North Carolina, In the Superior Court, yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT t He Tredell County. | Charles F, Moose, trading | L SIGMON, DEFENDANT ‘tt Gordan Travis smaTHA BERNICE LAT : as Moose Concrete Products , pLOYD LOFATE SIGMON, PLAINTIFF ) ompany, ee : - ORDER Wa Vs. i JUDGMENT 4 ing on for hearing upon application of the defendant for a This causing coming on to be heard and being heard by His Honor This cause coming 1 ing to the Court from the examination of the Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Count, North Carolina, change of venue, and it appearing Hit i ation and affidavit of the Defendant that the proper Hi and it appearing to the court that the defendant has been properly served complaint and the applicat He i Catawba County; ie with summons as is provided for by law, and that the said defendant has yenue of this cause is vata y3 Mit | It is now ORDERED that this action be and the same is hereby removed from Hi neither filed answer or demurrer or other-wise filed pleading, and that the | the Superior Court of Iredell County to the Superior Court of Catawba County. Bi time for filing answer or other pleading has elapsed, and that the plaintiff . | It is FURTHER OXDERED that all original papers filed in this cawe be transmit- Bt is entitled to judgment on the pleadings, and the court finding as a fact tht i ted to the Court to which the case is removed. \ this is and action for a sum certain for which judgment by default final can be This the 11 day of September, 1952. had, It is therefore, ordered adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover i ae ee ne — of the defendant the sum of $349.80 with interest on the said amount from C, G. Smith Tlerk of the Superior Court = sae July 29, 1952 until paid and for the cost of this action. mek mw mK OK HK OK KO % me x Phis the 11 eptember 1952. C, G,. Smith Ho, Ht | erk of the Superior Court 933k i for Iredell County, N. C. NORTH CAROLINA. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDSLL COUNTY. Zeno W. Proctor, Plaintiff -Vs- Charles 4, Heath, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable v. G. Smith, Clerk @& the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgnent against the defendant by default and inquiry; And it appearing to theéourt that a verified complaint was filed and {il summons issued to the defendant herein on the 25th day of July, $952; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other Pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file Pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; nr . 2 - a “ > S 2 “ : 2 : ; > “ oO rs] - . > C c c c Cc 3 = ~ ° — — — S. 7 2) re — a a ~ - ~ oO os g¢ & oN oa : . . a = S C os 7 ao © @ . ‘ame Cc ; * i a" Oo = , <a 5 = ke C -* = “a ©€ & © Sa = . e : ; - 7 J — . 42 C -- =_ . Po . : e E ‘ = i t 4 - c. ; < ae ~ » on ~ C <3 2 = Py zm cw c - por o © Ss me “ H = S O s - 2 « : = < S C > s m2 b J « ; ro i o S a - > © +> = 2 © 2 c $ > > < 7 Ss ; = © b=) ° 4 S a ‘ = - : wo = © > uf z ci < o & GS = . - ; & “oOo <> 4 = - m e Le at co nH 2 e+ a 7 ~ : x - a C S — ot > ¢ = _ S - > © : 2 @ od ~ . S < & = = © < 3 = ™ © 4 - = t= s = & E o : 5 3 oOo © = - + = <2 : a] ‘ 2 4 3 = < aa Ss = ~ * ~~ > = © > - 2 ‘ a = - “- - 2 2 ‘ = = ~-< 5 dea © . — = wn s. © a2 ts ort Be te. c = = t < < © os @ > Oo @ @ e=4 o > + £3 . - > c © Pe : t a [ - © we > +» © = o > ng RT yout X CO 7 , ) . i ae i , Nn 1) ,) Baxter f wyn egid Ee ¢ t. f ‘ P a = tj - : > -~ rc so) = : : = _ ; - » * + > - 4 - 7 civ e 3 = . = S ™ ols x E * <2 f. = > is | 5 gE > : ‘es * | : . = ; c <=! i . y) o- So * = ie defendant for such damages as a jury may award Clerk of the Superior Court. {D = x ; : -~ e ¢ : uw ON - ec “1 uw S CN ‘ ne . Se . a : o a Se : e é a 2 oc — 2 oe Ooo ON OO > : 2, o S ) It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have that inquiry of the amount ofsuch damages be executed at the next civil term of This 13th day of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before a jury to determine the amount of and recover judgmmt against t said damages. ‘assed contract wer, or other ple ' tne as e to file pleadings ? ay oe filed has exp ir eds J . ir verified Complaint of the Pie j to pay a sum of (housand-S!xty Two Dollars rust, 1 51, until paide e that the Plaintiffs nav t and recover ith interest thereon from the 4rd day qi >+¥™ t iig actione This the 16th day of No, 4370 WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1952 LINDA KENNELY DEAL vs ORDER CHARLES HOWARD DEAL This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the August 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior Court before His Honor Dan kK, Moore, Judge Presiding upon motion of the plaintiff and notice to the defendant to show cause why he should not be adjudged in comtempt of court for failure to make the monthly payments for the months of February, March, April and May 1952; and it appearing to the court that this matter was heard before his Honor John H, Clement, Judge Presiding at the May 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior Court but that said cause vas continued until the August 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior Court and no order was entered at that time and it further appearing to the court from statements of counsel for the parties that a judgment was entered and duly signed by His Honor deb V, Nettles, Judge Presiding at the November Term 1947 of Iredell County Superior ‘ourt but that said judgment has been lost or misplaced and does not appear among the ainutes of this court and that said judgment was as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘KEVELL COUNTY NOVEMBER Tis, 1947 LINDA KENNERLY DEAL vs JUDGMBI CHARLES HOWARD DEAL This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the November Tern, l \ 947 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor Zeb V. Nettles, Judge P Pesiding and it appearing to the Court that this was an action for absolute divorce on the grounds of two years separation; and it further appearing that there were thr : ** children born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant, namely: Donald Lee Deal, age 11 years, Charles Howard Deal, Jr., age 8 years, and Grady Allen Deal, age 6 years and that the custody of said children has beon awarded to the plaintiff, Linda Kennerly Deal; and it further appearing that the defendant Charles Howard Deal, has agreed to pay to the Plaintiff, Linda Kennerly Deal, the sum of $75.00 per month for the maintenance and support of the three minor Children: SD TN Sy one are It is, therefore, by consent of the plaintiff and defendant, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, Charles Howard Deal, pay to the Plaintifs, Linda Kennerly Deal, the sum of$75.00 per month payable on the lst day of each and nth 4] every calendar month for the maintenance and support of the three minor children hereinabove named, the first payment to be due and payable on the lst day of fh November, 1947. a. The Court snall have the rig..it to increase or decrease the payment herein ordered upon motion made at any subsequent term of the Court, This the 10th day of November, 1947. 7 ‘ ee , > ae 4 : " Tee ee iq Zeb V. Nettles if Judge Presiding Mi . And it further appearing, and tne Court finds as a fact, that the ' defendant, Vharles Howard Veal, is as of this date in arrears on the payments ordered in the foregoin= juigment in the total sum of 3275.00. 4t is therefore, by consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the , defendant, Charles Howard Deal, pay to the plaintiff, Linda Kennerly Deal, the sum of $3100,00 per month, commencing on the lst day of September, 1952 and on the lst day o. each and every calendar month thereafter up to and including the lst day of July, 1953 after which date the said payments stall be reduced to $75.0 in accordance with the original judgment as set out above, it being the intent a ' ; . th Hi | of the Court to require tiie defendant, Uharles Howard Deal to pay $25.00 per mon Bi iil on the arrearage of $275.00 and all said payments to be used for the pu poses sé rh Hy forth in the original Judgement herein, *his cause is retained for such further ordere as may be proper | This the 6th day of August, 1952, | Dan ke il) Judge Presiding 1 I By consent of: i W, R, Battley ‘|| Attorney for Plaintit? Grant Bolmer Attorney for Defendant ee Mo. 4690 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Automotive Products Company i We i JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Hugh R, Melcor : This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the court that the natters and things arising in this action have been settled and compromised and that the Plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the action be and the same >» . is hereby nonsuited and dismissed and the defendant taxed with the cost of appeal which has been paid. This the llth day of September, 1952. LU, G, Smith Ulerk Superior Vourt Consented to: land, Sowers & Avery By Isaac T. Avery, Jr. Attorney for the PTaintibt Grant. Bolmer Attorney for the Defendant ‘No. 5327 In the Superior Court NORTH CAROLIN CAROLINA, September Term, 1952 ROWAN COUNTY. George H, Cook, Jr., 1 Plaintiff, | Vs. j ISSUES Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, | Defendant. ! 1. Did the plaintiff, George H. Cook, Jr., and the defendant, Nathila ‘ ? Angeline Malcolm Cook, intermarry on July 14, 1951, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes f 2. Has the plaintiff, George H. Cook, Jr., been a bona fide resident o ent "te State of North Garolina for six months immediately preceding the commencem of this action? ANSWER _ Yo SET ERB rm —— ee ae os es ee . S me Saal aaeeeeneneie eialinmniathendeletimeneteneneanaaatineiema aa oe ee i ee 3. Was the defendant, Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, pregnant at the time of the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant? ANSWER _ Yes : h. Is the plaintiff the &ther of the child with which the defendant was pregnant at the time of the marriage, and which child was born to the defendant on October 5, 1951, and given the name of Patsy Ann Cook? ANSWEF No ° 5. Was the plaintiff ignorant of the fact that the defendant was pregnant at the time of the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant? ANSWER __ Yes __ "a True Copy Sept. 15, 1952 Vera Maie Uzzell Veputy Clerk of Superior Court nr a of Xowan County, N.C. (SEAL) NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Vourt aa Veptember Term 1952 ROWAN COUNTY. George H. Vook, Jr., | Plaintiff, | Vs. i JUDGMENT Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, I Vefendant,. | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor Dan K, “oore, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the September Term 1952, Superior Court for Rowan County, North Carolina ubmitted » and the following issues having been 5 to and answered by the jury, to-wit: 1. vid the plaintiff, George i. Sook, Jr., and the defendant, Nathila vrol4 ’ Qn . 9 angeline Malcolm Look, intermarry on July 14, 1951, as alleged in the complaint: ANSWER Yes 7 2. Has the plaintiff, George H. Cook, Jr., been a bona fide resient of the State of North Carolina for six months immediatly preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes 3. Was the defendant, Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, pregnant at the time of the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant? ANSWER _ Yes 4. Is the plaintiff the father of the child with which the defendant was pregnant at the time ofthe marriage, and which child was born to the defendant on October 5, 1951, and given the name of Patsy Ann Cook? ANSWER ___No.e 5, Was the plaintiff ignorant of the fact that tie defendant was pregnant at the time of the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant? ANSWER _ Yes ° —— The Court finds that summons was duly served on the defendant, Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, on the llth day of July, 1952, by nx. E. Perkins, Deputy sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, by leaving with the defendant a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint in this action, The Court further finds that the defendant was not at the time of the institution of this action, nor is she now, nor has she becn at any time since the institution of this action, in the military service of the United States of america. the Court further finds that a chi]d was born to the defendant on October 5, 1951, and that said child, a daughter, was civen the name of Patsy Ann Cook, the Court further finds that upon motion of Adams, Dearman and winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that His Honor Dan kK, loore, Judge Presiding at the . } ar m , . , » en -4 ene : . de ~ fy + oY September 1952 Term Superior Court for Rowan County, signed an order on veptenber ~. , 1952, removing this action from the Superior Court ofiredell County to the September Terr, 1952 of Rowan County Superior Court for@rial, and setting the date of trial f Mand ac nia 2h 152 and that a copy ofthe aforementioned rial for lionday, September 15, 1952, and that a copy not3 y , . . . a i ee eidinge } - notion and a copy of the order of His Honor Dan h. hoore, Judge Presiding, here inabove referred to, was duly served on the defendant on tne 8th day of September, 1952, by R. E, Perkins, Deputy sheriff of Iredell County, by leaving with the ‘efendant a copy of the order directed to thesheriff ofIredell County, a copy a . 2 » ‘ + — Pa } D 4 . ‘ ot the notion of Adams, Dearman and winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, anda , } ’ " . * v4 con Lf 2 Copy of the order removing this cause to sxowan Vounty superior »v surt for trial ob the 15th day of September, 1952. T..at this cause, though transferred from Iredell County to Rowan County, is still tried within the rifteenth Judicial “istrict, and that the rights of the defendant have not been taken advantage of ad that no injustice has been done to the defendant thereby. IT Is, THE CONSIDERED, ORDERZD, ADJUDGED AND DSCREED: DoanNT ’ wh Gy ORL, 1. That the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintd ff and ™ defendant be, and they are dissolved, and that the plaintiff, George H. Cook, "+y 48 granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, sellin ip spe ei a itn tee SA Beco neh Ree rr ade pnt tiara tate ne pe ee ee ie en am pee — ae 2. ‘that the plaintiff, George H. Cook, Jr., is not the father of the child, Patsy Ann Vook, with which the aefendant was pregnant at the time of the marriage, and which child was born to the defendant on October 5, 1951 and ’ that none of the relationships, duties, liabilities and responsibilities of father and child exist between the plaintiff and the child, Patsy Ann Cook, herein re. ferred to. 3. That the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff. This the 15th day of September, 1952. Dan «1, Moore Judge Presiding at the September Tem 1952 Rowan County Superior Court, State of North Carolina, and holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, "A True Copy Sept. 15, 1952 Vera Maie Uzzell Deputy Clerk of Superior Court of Rowan County, N. Cc, ® NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court September Term 1952 Rowan County. George H. Cook, Jdr., Plaintiff, ORDER Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, | | Vs. | | : Defendant, | THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA: TO THE SHERIFF OR IREDELL COUNTY -- GREETING: You are hereby commanded to serve this order upon Nathila Angeline Maleols Cook, the defendant in the above entitled action, by delivering to her & saad of the motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, ” a copy of the order made by His Honor Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding at the September Term 1952 Rowan County Superior Court, transferring and removing the above entitled action from Iredell County to Rowan County, North Carolina for 3 pis trial at the September Term 1952 of Rowan County Superior Court, and 4 copy of © order, And Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, the defendant in the above entitled action, will take due notice that the above entitled action, which is 4» ome for an absolute divorce on the ground set forth in the complaint and in the motion and order hereto attached, has been removed to the Superior Court of bom County for trial, and that the Same will be tried at the September Tem 1952 of County Superior Court at the Courthouse of Rowan County, in the City of Rowan salisbury, North Carolina, on Monday, September 15, 1952, at 10 o'clock, A. M., or as soon thereafter as the same can be reached for trial. Unig the 8th day of September, 1952. Dan K, Moore Judge Presiding at the September 1952 Rowan County Superior Court and Holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District. "A True vopy September 5, 1952. Vera Maie Uzzell : Sort Deputy Clerk of Superior ou of Rowan County, N.C. (Seal) RETURN OF SHERIFF: Received the 8th day of September, 1952. Served the 8th day of September, 1952, on the defendant, Nathila Angeline Naleolm Cook, by leaving with and delivering to her a copy of this order, a copy of the motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry for removal, dated September 8, 1952, and a copy of the order of His Honor Dan K. “oore, Judge Presiding at the September, 1952, Rowan County Superior Court, dated September 8, 1952, removing this action to Rowan County Superior Vourt for trial at the September Term 1952. This the 8th day of September, 1952. J. C, Rumple, Sheriff of Iredell County By:__R, E. Perkins : Deputy oneriff of Iredell County "A True Cop vept. 15, 1952 Vera Maie Uzzell eputy Clerk of Superior Court of Rowan Cougity, N.C." (SEAL) In the Superior Court NORTH CAROLINA ; September Term 1952 ROWAN COUNTY, Geage H, Cook, Jr., Plaintiff, MOTION FOR REMOVAL OF CASE FOR TRIAL | I Vs, ! Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, | ' Defendant. 10 HONORABLE DAN K, MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING AT THE SEPTEMBER 1952 TERM OF SUPERIOR Co YRT FOR ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA: = Wy nL od Le ee NOW COME Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintire in the above entitled action, and make a motion to remove the above entitled action fron Iredell County to the Superior Court of Rowan county, North Carolina, for tria) at the Septenber Term 1952, and respectfully show to the Court: ale That this is an action for an absolute divorce, brought by the Plaintiff op the ground that at the time of the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant, the defendant was pregnant, and the plaintiff was ignorant of the fact of such pregnancy, and the plaintiff is not the father of the Child with which the de- fendant was pregnant at the time of the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant, a2e That summons in this action was issued by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on July 11, 1952, and was duly served on the defendant on July 11, 19%, and that the defendant has not filed an answer or other pleading; that the time for the defendant to plead has not been extended, and has now expired, a ‘hat this action was Commun ced and is now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and that Iredell County and Rowan County are both within the Fifteenth Yudicial District of North Carolina, he That the plaintiff is now, and has been since the 27th day of July, 1950, Serving in the United etates Navy, and that up until the 25th day of September he was Serving in the Pacific around Guam and other islands. ~5— “hat the plaintiff has been transferred temporarily to a submarine school in New London, Connecticut, but he does not know how long he is to be there, but he can obtain a leave and be present for the trial of this cause on the 15th day of September, 1952, if it can be transferred to the Superior Court of Rowan County for trial, ~ba That the next term of Superior Court in Iredell County will commence on November 3, 1952, and the plaintirr has no assuance that he will be in the United States at that time, 2s s if the plaintire moves that the above entitled action be removed the Saperior Court of Rowan County > er North Carolina, for trial at the Septemb k toc’) Term 1952, and that the Same be tried on Monday, September 15, 1952, at 10 0 A, M,, or as soon thereafter as the same can be heard. . °) Respectfully submitted , this the 8th day of September, 1952, ADAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERW BY. __C. B. Winberry Member of Firm Attorneys for the Plaintiff "| True Copy September 15, 1952 Vera Maie Uzzell eputy Vlerk or Superior Court of Rowan County, N. c, * (SEAL) In the Superior Court AROLINA NORTH C ’ September Term 1952 ROWAN COUNTY. George H. Cook, Jr., Plaintiff, Vs. Nathila Angeline Malcolm Cook, Defendant. eal " . 4 * doneisar * . th at ent on : Tam deste NaS tina pM tle - Bs Len = - a me ~ This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding over the September 1952 Term of Kowan County Superior vourt, upon the notion of Adams, Dearman andWinberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, to remove the above entitled action from Iredell County to the Superior Court of Kowan County, fat eee cps North Carolina, for trial at the September Term 1952, and it appearing to the nea © z ee et. Court, and the Court finding: -le ig. "pe eM That this is an action for an absolute divorce, brought by the plaintiff on the ground that at the time of the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant , the defendant was pregnant, and the plaintiff was ignorant of the fact of such pregnancy, and the plaintiff is not the father of the child with which the defendant was pregnant at the time of the marriage between the Plaintire and defendant. a a aoa a2e “hat summons in this action was issued by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell} County on July 11, 1952, and was duly served on the defendant on July ll, 1952, and that the defendant has not filed an answer or other pleading; that the time for the defendant to plead has not been extended, and has now *xpired, -} that this action was commenced and is now pending in theSuperior Cour of Iredell County, North Carolina, and that Iredell County and Kowan County are both within the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, -ke That the plaintiff is now, and has been since the 27th day of July, 1950, serving in the United States Navy, md that up until the 25th day of September he was serving in the Pacific around Guam and other islmds, -5- a That the plaintiff has been transferred temporarily to a submarine school i i in New London, vonnecticut, but he does not know how long he is to be there, A H 4 but he can obtain a leave and be present for the trial of this cause on th i 15th day of September, 1952, if it can be transferred to the superior Court of Rowan County for trial, itll That the next erm of Superior Court in Iredell County will commere on ee « . November 3, 1952, and the plaintiff has no assurance that he will be in th United States at that time. Je That the removal of this cause from Iredell County to the Superior Court of Rowan County for trial will not in any way prejudice the rights of the defendant, and will not in any way adversely affect her interest. IT Is, THEREFORE, UPON MOTION OF ADAMS, DEARMAy AND WINBERRY, ATTORNEYS FOR | THE PLAINTIFF, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: | l. Hp i of Rowan Thatthis action be, and the same is hereby removed to the Superior Court County, North Carolina, for trial at the September Term 1952, with the Same to be tried on Monday, the 15th day of September, 1952, at 10 o'clock, A. ml or as soon thereafter as the case can be reached for trial.. | 2 That a copy of this order and a copy of the motion of Adams, Dearman abt Winberry, Attorneys for theplaintiff, be served on the defendant by the Sheriff of Iredell County, i This the 8th day of September, 1952 Dan K, Moore F950 Judge Presiding at the September 44g Xowan County Superior Court and al the Courts of the Fifteenth eu District. "A True Cony Sept. 15, 1952 wera Maie Uzzell epvuty Clerk a Superior vo td Wc : rt cowan County, N. Cc, " ” ; (SEAL) 271 Yay EET No» 5363 rth Carolina | Iredell County Loan and Savings Bank Peoples Loan OH “plaintiff — vs nche °mith Mrs. Bla befendant —_—_——_——— se In the Superior Court Before the Clerk. JUDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, and it appearing to the Court from the statemet of the attorneys for the plaintiff that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the full amount of the note sued on in this action, and that the plaintiff has elected to take a voluntary nonsuit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and that the defendant taxed witn the costs in this action to be taxed by this Vourt. This September 23rd, 1952. vonsented to: Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, scott & Collier, Attorneys by sae Le Nash . No. 5287 North Varolina | Iredell County | Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, Plaintiff -VS- Mrs Walker @ ° rr Gampbell and tusband, Walker Campbell, and + FP. Frye Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable v. v, UG. Vlerk omith ouperior Vvourt In the Superior Court G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Gourt of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for Judgment against the defendant, 0. F. Frye by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified c Summ And it further appearing to the cour ons issued in this action on the 24th day of May, 1952; t that said summons together with a ¢ PY of said complaint were served on the defendant 9. F, Frye on omplaint was filed and the 27th day of slits a: ot ac nas a RGR PP RETETII a mG ah IORI GEGNE LNEAA SRS A RTO LER ORI RATT At * i) ae a 273 ee ; 1} May, 1952, but that summons were not served on defendants lirs, Walker Campbel] Kio, 4846 ; Hi IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a and husband, Walker Campbell by reason that they were not to be found in Irede)} NORTH CAROLINA : | BEFORE THE CLERK : i County nor the State of North Carolina; IREDELL COUNTY | | : | | And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other R, 8. Barkley, Ince, Hh i ; i | it pleadings have been filed by the defendants and no extension of time to file Plaintiff, | : | ij | iP lI i | pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed We Tero i Hi] | i q Wet | i has expired; Eugene Davidson, | i aR i |} | And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that eens h} ! il | | | the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of i ae PN money fixed by the contract, namely the sum of Four Hundred Ninety & 04/100 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, and it appearing i} i He | | (3490.04) Dollars with interest thereon from the 2nd day of November, 1951, and to the Court that the defendant has been properly served by Sum ons, and that Vt 1 ) ul which sum is evidenced by an interest bearing note made by Mrs. Walker Campbell Vomplaint has been regularly executed in this cause, and it further appearing i i | 1 | and endorsed by defendant 0. F. Frye; to the Court that no answer, demurrer or other pleading has been ee the \ | : NOW, THERSFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff | defendant within the time allowed by law, and that the plaintiff i entitled to aave and recover of the defendant 0. *, Frye the sum of Four Hundred Ninety & 04/10 [I judgment by default final; (3490.04) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 2nd day of November, 1951, and the It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the plaintiff have costs of this action, and recover of the defendant the sum of $88.79, with interest from the 7th day ‘i This the 24h day of September, 1952. of October, 1941, until paid, and for the costs of this act-on to be taxed against > G. Smith the defendant. ete ‘ ' C. G, Smi - | | | | r i H Clerk of the Superior Vourt. It is further ordered, that the said Kelvinator Refrigerator No. 1125864 } ia . a a - ; 2 ; . | | | : hi cott & vollier, Attorneys for Plaintiff. now in the possession of the plaintiff under claim and delivery proceedings b , > the . ! sold, after due advertisement as required by law, and that the proceeds ol Lib f oe . bk : s if said sale be applied to the payment of this judgment, and that the surplus, i my, be paid to the defendant as required by law. This the 26 day of Sept., 1952. C. G, smith , . Clerk of ouperior Vourt Hi Nah i #1 | Mi : ia en Hil! it) |i va ae He hal HH Pail ih a ee a Bee | Ril i eae | Re tu Heil ipa Wait | Hi | i Hel SAGs sige ng eo — oe ayes ee i; JNo. 5068 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Bunch Funeral Home, Inc., Plaintiff, VS. JUDGMENT R, L. Daniels, individually and as Administrator of ©. 2. Vaniels Estate, Mrs. Minnie Daniels vVompton and Mrs. £. RX. Daniels, widow, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the parties have adjusted and compromised the differences between them, and have agreed that the plaintiff shall recover the sum of $1,000.00 amd the costs of this action; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by consent, t.at the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of 91,000.00, and that the defendant pay the costs of this action. This the 26th day of September, 1952. C, G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court BY CONSENT: Land, Sowers & Aver Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymer & Raymer Attorneys for Defendants mM MH Me oe oe ook me oe ook Me oe oe Noe 5370 yort CAROLINA 1REDELL COUNTY In the Superior Court Before the Clerk ). Ae McLaurin, Plaintiff. Vs. J, H. Dorton and I | | MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY NONSUIT ! Mary E. Dorton, { 1 Defendants. Now comes William R. Pope, Attorney for the Plaintiff in the above entitled action and would respectfully show the court that the matters and things set out in the Plaintiff's affidavit for a warrant of attachment have been fully adjusted and settled, and the note mentioned therein has been fully paid, The Plaintiff respectfully moves that a juugment of Voluntary Nonsuit be entered in the above entitled action. This 29th day of September, 1952. William R. Pope Attorney for Plaintiit NORTH CAROLINA : In the Superior Vourt IREDELL COUNTY ). A. McLaurin, { Plaintiff. | Vs. , JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT J. H, Dorton and ! “ary &, Vorton, Defendants, This cause coming on to be heard on motion of William I. Pope, attorney for the Plaintiff, and being heard before the Honorable ©. G. Smith, Clerk of the “uperior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Vourt that the matters and things set out in the Plaintiff's Affidavit for a warrant of attachment in the above entitled action have been fully settled, and tae note me 7 cas : ‘“ntioned therein has been vully paid. i 4 ane t It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed tiat a judgnmt of .v ; oluntary Nonsuit be and is hereby entered in the above mtitled action. This the 1 day of October, 1952. C, G,Smith C. G, omith, Clerk Superior Court ; 43 hee Site { Wd | i ‘a ’ iH ge! hes RS bai eh oe 5 ‘ ik, ; i cf aaa Uj iM i Bae ERR a Wai an — . a > oe SEs . ee > - = lio. 5361 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPEAIOR couRT COUNTY OF IREDELL State of North Carolina on Relationship of the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina vs. JUDGMENT Vernon otor Company, Inc. Box 14 Statesville, Worth Carolina Employer No. 55=49=021 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned C, 6, Snith, vlerk of the superior vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel and from the record of pleadings filed herein that this is an action for injunctive relief, praying that the defendant be enjoined from further operation of business in the state of North Carolina, and it further appearing to the Court that summons was issued on September ll, 1952, and that due return was made thereof by J. C. Rumple, Sheriff of Iredell County, on september 15, 1952, that "After due and dili-ent search J. S. Vernon, Presider of Vernon Motor Company, not to be found in Iredell Sounty, North Carolina," and it further appearine to the undersigned from statement of Vounsel for the plaintiff that tle Vernon lotor Vompany, inc., the defendant in this proceeding, has ceased operations in the vtate of North Carolina and is no longer conducting a business in this State, and that the plaintiff has elected to take a voluntary nonsuit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs. this the 4 day of Vetober , 1952, C, G. Smith vlerk of the Superior Court Consented and agreed to: W. D. Holoman B. Overton R. B. Billings D, G, Ball 4ttomeys for the LumpLo C ; : o ment Se Commission of North Pe curity Olina fo. 3762 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County W Bs Raymer L, Raymer, Jr. and We ; srading os Raymer Oil C ompany VS. A, L. Setzer, A- L. Setzer, dr., | { |} CONSENT JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT | and C. E. Setzer This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the plaintitfs and defendants have agreed to a compromise and settlement of all matters in controversy between them arising on the pleadings in this action amd that the basis for such settlement is that the plaintiffs have agreed and consented that their action be non-suited and the defendants have agreed and consented that their cross action be non-suited, i e t d juc and decreed that the It is, therefore, by consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed plaintiffs be non-suited and their action dismissed and that the plaintiffs be taxed with the cost; and, judg and < 2ed that ti fendants It is further, by consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed that tne defenda be non-suited and their aoss action be dismissed. This the 7 day of October, 1952. C. G. omith ; Clerk Superior vourt DL. Raymer, Jr, v. 4, Raymer, dr. WY e De kayme r W. BD, Raymer A, L. Setzer A. L. Setzer Ask, setzer, Jr, . oeuzer, Jor Setzer v. , Setzer ‘yo. 751 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior court IREDELL COUNTY M.L. WALKER, Plaintiff + ” ” JUDGMENT WADE MARLOWE, Defendamt st This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and the Defendant have compromised and settled all matters and things in controversy and that the Plaintiff desires to take a nonsuit herein: It is therefore, on motion of Raymer and Raymer and Woodhouse and Ward, Attorneys for tio Plaintiff, ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be dismissed and the Plaintiff is hereby taxed with the costs. This 13th day of Octover, 1952, C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court By consent of: Raymer and Raymer Woodhouse and Ward, Attorneys for Plaintiff By Williem I. Ward, Jr, W. R. Battle “Kttorney Tor Detentant— 0 5352 jorth Caroline Iredell County a Savings Bank peoples loan and Wanye eire 0 In the Superior Court } -Vie- Walter D. Levan and wife, Mrs. Walter D. Levan, R. E. Levan a wife, Mra. R. E. Levan, am a — sr Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G,. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County , upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendants, Walter D. Levam and wife, Mrs. Walter D. Leven, R, B. Levan and wife, Mrs. R. E. Levan, and Mrs, Ruth Lawing, by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 6th day of Septemoer, 19523 And it further appearin; to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on defendants Walter D, Levan and wife, irs, Walter D. Levan and R. E. Levan and wife, Mrs. R, E, Levan on the 6th day of September, 1952, and that said summons together with a copy of said complaint was served on defendant Mrs. Ruth Lawing on the llth day of September, 19523 And it further appearing to the court that mo answer, demurrer, or other pleadings have been filed by the defendants or my one of them and no extension of time to file pleadings has oeen grante my be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the oreach of an express contract to pay &® sum of money fixed by the contract, mamely, the sum of Eight Hundred Forty & no/100 (¥8)0,00) Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six percent from July 21, 1952 until paid, and which sum is evidenced by # note made oy Walter D, Levan and wife, Mrs, Walter D. Levan and endorsed oy defendants R. E. Levan and wife, Mrs. R. EB. Levan and Mrs. Ruth Lawing; NOW THEREFORE, itds ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff tave and recover of the defendants Walter D, Levan and wife, Mrs. Walter D. Leven nd R. E, Levan and wife, Mrs. R. E. Levan, and Mrs. Ruth Lawing the sum of SIGHT HUNDRED FORTY & NO/100 ($80.00) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from July 1952, and the costs of this action. This the 13 day of October, 195% C. G. Smith —tiem oF the Superior Court. 8 Sott & Collier, Attorneys for Plaintiff. ae ennaxnaeneneaee Ee a OO Am a and that the time within which pleadings a, ee n ff 20 ' i | iM i ule Tl bea i er i | \No. 4,389 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY C, E. FRALEY AND JAMES M. FRALEY Partners and doing business as FRALEY'S FOOD STORES IN THE SUPERIOR COURT vs JUDGMENT ESTHER WOLFERT, Trading and doing business as NATIONAL MANUFACTURING AND PACKING, NATIONAL MANUFACTURING AND PACKING COMPANY, a North Carolina Corporation, Richard Russell, Harold A Troutman and W. C. Evans HHRHRHHHHHAAH This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs and the defendants have compromised and settled all matters and things in controversy between them and that the plaintiffs desire to take a voluntary nonsuit and that the defendant, Esther Wolfert, desires to take a voluntary non- suit as to her cross action and counterclaim: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, considered and decreed that plaintiffs cause of action and the defendant's cross action and counterclain be, and the same are, dismissed. This the 15th day of September, 1952. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court By consent of: McLaughlin & Battley By W. R, Battle Attorneys tor Paint Esther Wolfert sther Wolfert, RK KK KK Rk me ee | F mnt Z AD eh mr ty | / Noe 5358 Worth Carolina | Iredell County an and Savings Bank peoples Loan ang oantift , In the Superior Court ili JUDGMENT Walter D. Levan and wife, , Walter D. Levan, R. E. ie aad Mrs. Elizabeth A, Myers, Executrix of C. B. liyers Estate Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C, G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendants Walter D, Levan and wife, Mrs. Walter D. Levan, R. E. Levan, and Mrs. Elizabeth A, Myers, Executrix of C. B. lyers, Estate, by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 9th day ofSeptember, 1952; And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on defendants Walter D. Levan and wife, Mrs, Walter D. Levan on the 13th day oi September, 1952, and that said sumons together with a copy of said complaint were served on defendants R. E. levan and Mrs. Elizabeth A. Myers, Executrix of C. 3, Myers Estate on the 15th day of September, 1952; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleadings have been filed by the defendants or any one of them and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within waich pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay 4 sum of money fixed by the contract, namely the sum of Nine Hundred Thirty- Three & 85/100 ($933.85) Vollars with interest thereon from September 9, 1952 util paid, and which sum is evidenced by a note@made by defendants Walter D. Levan and wife, Mrs, Walter D, Levan and endorsed by defendants Rk, &, Levan and Ws. Elizabeth A, Myers, Executrix of U. b. Myers Estate; NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, Walter D. Levan and wife, Mrs. Nalter D, Levan, R. E, Levan, and Mrs. Elizabeth A. Myers, Executrix of . B. Wers Estate the sum of NINE HUNDRED THIRTY-THREE & 65/100 ($933.85) DOLLARS, RRS ee oO eet SS pap amen eee 2 RC i Serica, 28? ‘cor eee WITH interest thereon from September 9, 1952, and the costs of this action This the 16 day of October, 1952. C. G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court ae Scott & Collier, Attorneys for Plaintiff. mw we HK hk mK mK Om Ut OM os OK we me Me Ok ao ‘No. 535% NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY J. R. Austin, Plaintiff, vs. JUDGMENT Walter D, Levan, Mrs. Walter D, Levan, R. E. Levan and Mrs. R. E. Levan Defendants. ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the defendants have all been properly served by summons; and that they, or either of them, have not filed answer or otherwise pled within the time allowed by law; and the Court further finding as a fact that this is an action for a sum certain, ami thatéhe plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of $325.00, with interest thereon from the 1s d : ay of July, 1952, until paid, at the rate of 6% per annum, and for the costs 2 this action, This the 18th day of October, 1952, ¥. G. Smith Clerk o1 Superior Court "TOS tCteeeeeeeeeeesese fo e 5365 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY 3 Industrial Bank Inc. State sville Plaintiff: 9 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT VS. JUDGMENT Torrence and Naomi Torrence, — Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by his Honor, C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and the Court finding as a fact that the defendant have been properly served with Summons and have not answered or otherwise filed pleadings within the time allowed by law; and thecourt finding as a fact that this is an action for a sum certain, and that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final; and the Court further finding as fact that Claim and Delivery was issued at the institution of this action, and the plaintiff has in its possession the personal sroperty described in the said Complaint and Claim and Delivery, and that it 1s entitled to sell the same at public sale and apply the proceeds to the indebtedness due, It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed: 1. That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of 3335.42, with interest from July 26, 1952 until paid. ind he is hereby appointed Commissioner by 2. That Neil S. Sowers be this Court to sell the said personal property described in the Complaint after lue advertisement as required by law, and after first paying all costs attached : ; + sd 4 , i é quired to this action, to apply the purchase price to the said indebtedness as requirec ‘y law, and to make his report to this court as required by law. This the 18th day of Uctober, 1952. C, G, omith " Clerk of ouperior Vourt kkk kk eee RH HEE >. ae me ie aw pas FRET ae tn Rt iy oe etre Meee en 1 INo. 5373 | North Uarolina In The Superior Court Iredell Vounty Before the Vlerk Willis Rnodes, Sr., Guardian of Willis xhodes, ur. seer ef ee bf VS. Judgment of Nonsuit H } i] yp : : EE en Ted Goodwin, Minor and J. A. REA tall Pearson | 4 4 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable aia Carl G, Smith, Clerk of the Iredell Superior Vourt, and it appearing to the | Vourt from tne statement of the attorney for tne plaintiffs, that the plaintifgs desire to be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this action. it i i It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiffs be j and they are nereby allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. The costs to be paid by the plaintiffs. | this 22miday of October, 1952, | k ee | 4 v, G. emith mh i Ulerk of the Superior Court ‘0, 508 Ho CARD LINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT pixie Plywood Company VS. CONSENT JUDGMENT ooo oom on-Lael Fixture Corporation ners Indemnity Company This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, oy consent of counsel, and it appearing to the Court that counsel for the plaintiff and defendant have agreed between themselves as to the settlement of this case and as a result of said agreement of a settlement, it was agreed that the balance due by the defendants to the plaintiff for the matters and things alleged in the Complaint as of the entering of this Judgment, is $1, 55h. 26 and that the defendant, Travelers Indemnity Company, has paid this amount in full to the plaintiff and that said defe: dant has reimoursed the plaintiff for the sum of $10.00 for court costs advanced oy the plaintiff and that there are no further sums due by either of the defendants to the plaintiff; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover nothing further from the defendants, or either of them, on account of the matters and things set out in the Complaint and that the action be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff. This Octooer 25rd, 1952. C. G. Smith Clerk Super .or Court Iredell County Agreed to: ~.__°» H. Dearman Attorney for the Plaintif?T R, A. Collier Kitorney for the Defendants a % ——— —_——— _ — = ees — _——_ as = ~ es e ‘ , ae laa ee Noe 5120 NORTH CAROLINA IN TEE SUPERIOR cour? IREDELL COUNTY Garden City Plating Company VS. CONSENT JUDGMENT Morrison-Lael Fixture Corporation and Travelers Indemnity Company This cause coming on to be heard before Honoraole C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, by consent of counsel, and it appearing to the Court that counsel for the plaintiff and defendants have agreed between themselves as to the settlement of this case and as a result of said agreement of Settlement, it was agreed that the balance due by the defendants to the plaintiff for the matters and things alleged in the Complaint as of the entering of this Judgment is $3,000.00 and that the defendant, Travelers Indemnity Company, has paid this amount in full to the plaintiff and that said defendant has reimbursed the plaintiff for the sum of ¥10.00 for court costs advanced by the plaintiff and that there are no further sums due dy either of the defendants to the plaintiff; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover nothing further from the defendants, or either of them, on account of the matters sn things set out in the Complaint and that the action be dismissed at the cost of tie plaintiff. This Octover 23rd, 1952. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Iredeli County Acreed to: C. H. Dearman Attorney for Plaintiff R. A. Collier Attorney for Defendants ac RG eReeanaaeaest 2 hoe CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK of plic Service Company a Carolina, Ince JUDGMENT V8. R, & Cansler This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Super- tor Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and de- fendant have agreed to @ settlement between themselves and that the plaintiff desires to take @ voluntary non-suit; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the same be dismissed and the plaintiff taxed with the costs. This Oct. 2th, 1952. C. G. Smith “Clerk Superior Court $5286 — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK RR AF a 2 IREDELL COUNTY H, & B. Company of Statesville, Inc. vs. JUDGMENT Sa eit tak R. Ae Bowlin, R. A. Collier, J. F. Donnelly, Rooert Smith, John kK. Lippard and J. E. Smith. This cause coming on to be heard vefore the undersigned Clerk of the Super- for Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court from the return of the Sheriff in this action and the answer of R. A. Collier, one of the garnishees, that hone of the other garnishees have any property which ovelongs to the principal defend- mt, R. A. Bowlin, except K. A. Collier, who had in his possession the sum of #540.91, which he has paid into this Court to ve paid to the plaintiff; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the sum of $340.91 Paid into the court for the benefit of the plaintiff be paid to the plaintiff as a redit against any sums due oy the defendant, R. A. Bowlin, to the plaintiff. It is further found by the court that the garnishee defendants, Be &. Soler "\ F, Donnelly, Rébert Smith, John H. Lippard and J. B, Smith, do not now have any Property or assets belonging to R. A. 3owlin and insofar as they are conderned, the &tion is dismissed, The plaintiff is taxed with the costs, October 2, 1952. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior court tQeeuznueeezreeveevtrrnreaet By ial Wade i m Aa | 5357 Hi Wt ae NORTH CAROLINA 40h AROLINA ee an a | IN THE SUPERIOR CouR? yORTH ¢ IN THE SUPERIOR COUKT be IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK vggneLL COUNTY | il Mae M. Bell ( uM Postar ti ) i per and Manu & beL neeent ee Plaintiff, i vs. 0 JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Company » 4 ! Pine vs. 0 JUDGMENT NON-SUIT Pea a Fred L. Sell ( Q BB tM. Stanley et al, Defendants = Pt . e 17 ; i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Car) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G. i G. Smith, Clerk of the Iredell Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court fron o 1a) Pty | Smith, 5 f k Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina; and it appear- fi ie ashe WL the statement of the attorney for the plaintiffs, that the plaintiffs desire to | Dai " de ing to the Court that in the statement of the attorney for the plaintiff that the allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this action. plaintiff has elected to take a voluntary non-suit in the aoove entitled action; It is therefore ordered, adjudzed, and decreed that the plainti ay : , ffe be and It is therefore, ordered, adjudsed and decreed that the olaintiff be volun- | ee 1 " j | I a | Mt | ewig they are hereby allowed to take a boluntary nonsuit. The costs to ve paid by the Atal tarily non-suited and oe taxed with the costs to ve charged oy the Clerk. bail | plaintiffs. eae i i 441) This the 29th day of Octover, 1952. 1 This 27th day of Ictover, 1952. i i C. GS. Smith Hut a C. G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court bye | Clerk Superior Court Consented to: Woodhouse & Ward eeervrriureireererteaete & & By: W. mo Ward Jr. attorneys for piaintitt Se eRRERHeHeEHRReE RE x xe ax No, 5401A Grace S white | NO. 367 i | Seminole Superior vourt i . July Term, 1952 | Suit for divorce forrest white byt Upon consideration oi this case upon evidence submitted as provided oy law, | I it is the judement of the Court that a total divorce be granted, that is to say faye i| a divorce a vinculo matrinonii, between tne parti s to the above stated case, iI | upon legal principles. i ; And it is considered, ordered and decreed by tue vourt tnat the marriage Wt Lali , ; : ' Soe to thi e, from and | contract heretovore entered into between the parties to this case, Arun , s fully and effectually as i ved a r i : 5 : . if ter this date, ve and is set aside and dissolved hd) if no such Contract had ever been made or entered into, and plaintiff and \ HT) def ats S d i Slendant, tormerly husband and wire, in the future snall be held and consiaere “8 Separate and distinct persons altogether unconnected by any nuptial union or Ci ' } Vil contract whatsoever. ipht to remarry and the defendant shall the Plaintiff herein shall have the ri have t} ve the right to remarry. fh ea i iy] 1 i HH \ Fil ea Ea ioe Ley Wh anon UE Ate iy ea i; aE Hi) Ni ‘sn ar o1 ' Cr Et \) The Court awards custody of the child oi the parties to the plaintirr baliehe 1 at | ’ Be Ea HV i Pa ee aay | Grace D« nite. ie if eh i Vat HO. 5375 Weel pit Decree entered this l4ta day oi July, 1952. RTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Hn t T N ti ' i /s/ W. I. Greer = i Mage Judge Superior Courts TREDSLL vOuNTY Mn Pataula Vircuit ii i Refining Vvompany | fh) ! ii} , Globe Plaintiff, ; bh Ey | Georgia, Seminole vounty: “a JUIGHANT NON@SUTL i i j Bd ung . , ’ ) » , ‘ . > ~ L. ‘ . Ri if 4 f. i I, L. 4d. Hastey, vlerk of the Superior Court in and for the above named Gaither Building oe Hi ' | Hy ; ; Defendan i haar vounty do hereby certify that tne above is a true and correct copy of the ; i, ti 1 . Mite | He @ PMP Rt . Behe ae — — — 2 42 ’ Q “whe , : ae . + ’ \ } alot ree final juugnent ana decree in the suit for divorce Grace 5. White Vs. Forrest This cause coming on to be heard and being heard beiore the Honorable HL iat ae iiss a , : etn aves ; . . . id Lethe ee Se ee ee oe Peres ee See Sere oe eee cee oe ¢, G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, sorta varolina; 1 ee ee ee ee re and it appearing to the Vourt that in the statement of the attorney for tne 3 Wa} Witness my official signature and seal of office. ee ak od i : plaintiff that tne plaintiff has elected to take a volunary non-suit in the Wie tii Thais the 6th day of October, 1952. ae ue } ‘ ga) Sua ie ' above entitled action; ie | L. H. Hastey sii -_ ahd : 4 Ulerk of Seminole Vounty Superior Court, It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintif e i | Vonalsonville, Georgia. . ic nancial f i yoluntarily non-suited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by tn ° it rent (S#AL) 5 a } This the 30th day or October, 1952. Ta G. G. Smith i Clerk of Superior Vourt i i a wx x x Gonsented to: Land, Sowers & Avery Attorneys for plaintiff by WI Ward, Jre Sata arene “Bm sneer — _ ) oy scaler ii ee * ‘ ~ a Ss Sai acanaaincmada kates nee —_—S = ——$—— NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Be it remembered that County and State aforesaid 5tn day of November, 1952, FIRST IN THE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Wednesday, November 5, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERi1, 1952 a Superior Court begun and held in and for the at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. CU. on the at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where his Honor, Van K, oore, Judge Presiding and Holding Vourts for tunis the Fifteenth Judicial District of Nortn Varolina, Fall Term, 1952, is present and presiding, and Honorable seo A. morris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the ritteenth Judicial vistrict of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of tne ota+e. and opened Court by order of the Vourt, J. C. Rumple, High Sherifi of Iredell County returns into open Vourt the nams ot tne following gooa and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the sive J & Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present ber Term, 1952 Iredell Vounty SuperiorVourt, for the first week, to-wit: UG. L. Bunch Harwell W. UD. sverhart N. &. Brown Mrs. R. L. Reid Mrs. Harry Alexander Vaarles L. Sloop Philip V. Bush A. A. Hoover Mrs. G. E, Hughey W. H. Bell R. &. Page Rex 4 Seaver Jas. Lee morrison 8. S. sarkley W. G. Kimbrough J. E. Oxford Mrs. J. P. Brawley Young 5. Vavis “. U. sverhart was excused by tne Vourt. murs. K. L. Reid was excused by the Clerk, vnarles L. Sloop was not returned, T. O. Brawley was deceased, The following were sw hh —5—Brow_. orn as talesmen jurors for the J P Patterson R C Mayberry J A Brady, Sr +—S-timbroweh Mrs. Clara Lou Lowery W. F. Anthony Romie Henderson John A. Benfield R. M. Lazenby E. R. Rankin Thomas T. Brantley irs. Jonn b. Wall Mrs. H. H. Srvin C. C. mizell T. O, Brawley week; John L Milholland Leonard Templeton M L Hoffman No, 1103 State vs Guy Ramsey Wo. 1205 State vs Nathan Patterson sNo1345 State vs Mary Saunders iio. 1354 State vs Benjamin J. Threatte, Jr iNO. 1403 otate vs vlement P, Gaither, tio. 1404 otate vs Linburg Price Wo. 1415 State vs Vlifford Charles Hall vid. 1509 otate vs Toby Hyde Wo, 1572 tate vs Sud Little, alias Marshall Litt iO. 1599 State vs George & Ureson ‘No, 1601, State vs Joseph Fulton Woods IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER Tinh, 1952 Wednesday, November 5th, 1952 JX | i. FALSE PRETENSE Alias Capias BASTARDY Alias Vapias POSSESS LIQUOR Alias Vapias ASSAULT WITd DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order. ASSAULT wITH D&ADLY WeaPON Alias Capias BREAKING, bNTERING & LARUsNY Alias Capias FORG:RY Alias vapias LARUiNY Alias Capias BREAKING & cWNLERING Alias Capias ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order. DRIVING DRUNK Alias Vapias a he DOE INIT IEE Io nn mE TOON LE on nose AE OLE A ee oo ae as. ~~ = an oe EN Rp eo eR eee Sapna a 2 Se i iy IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ee-e-=- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Wednesday, November 5th, 1952 \No. 1605 } ABaNDON & NON-SUPPORT State Gontinued under farmer order, vs G, A. Benfield ( ‘No. 1606 J} DRIVING DRUNK — { Alias Capias Joseph t'ulton Woods | Homer A Nantz \No. 1616 | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State Alias Capias vs | J. D. Gray | oe, 285) } ASSAULT ON FEMALE Z | Continued under former order, | a. |} ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT = ( Continued under former order. Troy Fesperman | oo | ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT = ' Continued under former order. | P, W. Byers he bem | ABanDO. & NON-SUPPORT 7 | Alias Capias L. D. Wall ‘No. l Be S003 DRIVING DRUNK on Continued for the Term, Guy Richard Elmore No. 1768 9 * State URIVING DRUNK va Vontinued for the Term. William A moore No. 1 co | MANSLAUGHTER ve ! A True Bill. slbanks White No. 1 oe } SPEEDING tl vs | Defendant through his attorney, ¥- a, Bateim Amos Smith enters a plea of Nolo Vontendere. of W-M- Prayer for judgment continued on payment the Cost for which the County is liable. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ~---~ - NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 a Seana Wednesday, November 5th, 1952 Wo. 1732 State vs Thomas Crouch Johnson w.1)-37 ‘No. 1687 otate vs Dave Jackson Cen 46 io. 1730 State vs James sdward rrye w- 37 mmm mer remem =e DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. eis JUDGi.cNT of the vourt is that the defendant 1 be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell ii County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be ; assigned to work on the roads under the super- ls vision of the State Highway and Public Works et Commission. The prison sentence is suspended ii for a period of Three Years upon the following git expressed conditions: th 1. That he pay a fine of $105.00 and the cost. | 2. That he be of gemeral good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for three years. 3. That he not operate a motor venile on the public hicnways of \. uv. for Twelve honths. Vapias and commitment to issue without rurtner order of the Vourt in event the line ana costs are not paid at tnis term, otnerwise on motion of tne Solicitor at any subsequent term within three years onproof satisfactory to tne judge then presiding tnat the defendant has failea in whole or in part to comply with tnis judgment. ee cP Sa RSI esc neg wer POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Vef'endant enters a plea of nolo vontendere, through his attorney, W. Rk. Battley. JULDGHENT of the Yourt is tnat the defendant be confined in the Comwon Jail of Iredell re Gounty for a period of Twelve (12) Months, to “i be assigned to work on the roads under the ae," supervision of tne State Highway ana Public works Hf Commission. “he prison sentence is suspended tor i a periai of Three Years upon tne following ' express conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $50.00 and tne cost. ; 2, «shat he be ot general good venavior and i not violate any laws or tne state fur a period of tnree years, particularly that ne not violate any of tne prohibition laws. Capias and commitment to issue witnout iurtner order of the vourt in event tne tine and costs are not paid at tnis term, otnerwise on motion of tae Solicitor at any subsequent tern within three years on proof satisfactory to the juage then presiding that ne defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judpment. DRIVING DRUNK Vefendant enters a plea oi solo vontendere. JUUGMENY of the Court is tnat tne det'endant be cont'ined in the Vommon Jail oi Iredell vounty for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under tue supervision af the State Highway and Public works VLommission. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of three Years upon the following expressed nditions: i i. That he pay a fine of $200.00 and the cost. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle on ublic highways of 4. +. for three years. i That he be of general good behavior and not violate any laws of the state for three years. Capias and commitment to 4ssue without further order of the Court in event the fine and costs are not paid at this term, otherwise on motion of the Solicitor atfny subsequent term within three years on proof satisfactory to the judge then presiding that the defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judgment. an a hi INo. 1779 State vs Odie Vorry Uer= ‘No. 1689 otate vs Glenn L. vXetzer Welle No. 1780 “tate vs rorest Lee Jetton L=h8 No. 1781 State vs J. W. Vavis b=36 Wo. 1731 state vs Goleman Ray Miller YWNo. 1782 State vs Joe Brawley Morrison IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK e-e--- NOViMBER TER, 1952 Wednesday, November 5th, 1952 RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY Defendant enters a plea of Not Guil his attorney Mr. W. KR, Battley, Jury sworn & empanelled, Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty, ty through } DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Not Gui his attorney W. &,. aathh oe. : ubley through Jury sworn & empanelled as follows: ¢, 1 Bunch, J. G. Harwell, 5. S. Barkley, J.B. Oxford | Mrs. Harry Alexander, Philip V. Bush, A, A, Hoover, W. H. Bell, Mrs. Clara L. Lowery x, E, Page, Rex B. Beaver and Jas. Lee horrison, BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Vefendant enters a plea of Not Guilty, Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Jd. E, Oxford, mrs. J. P. brawley, Young 5, Davis, W. &, Anthony, Romie nenderson, Jonn A, Benfield, K. m. Lazenby, &. R. Rankin, Thomas T. Brantley, urs. John B. Wall, mrs. H. H. Ervin and ¢, U, iizell. Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged, { JUDGuEnT of the Vourt is that the defendant be conilined in the comuon jail of Iredell Vounty | for a period of Ninety (90) Vays, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of } the State Hignway and Public works Commission. | This sentence is to take effect at the expiration of tne Six months he is now serving imposed at the August Term, 1952 for possession. BREAKING, ENTsRING & LaavenY Defendant enters a plea ot Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: J. E. Oxford, mrs. J. P. Brawley, Young S. Davis, w. #. Anthony, somie Henderson, John A, Benfiels, R. i. Lazenby, E. R. Rankin, nomas T. Brantley, Mrs Jonn B, Wall, lurs. H. H. Ervin, and C, ¢. Mizell. Juryreturned a verdict of Guilty as charged, JULG:ENT of the Court is that the defendai be coniined in the Vommon dail of Iredell County for a period of Ninety (90) Days, to be assie to work on the roads mnder the supervision 0 the State Highway and Public works Commission | This sentence is to take effect at tne ee of the 6 months he is now serving imposed @ a August Term, 1952, Iredell vounty Superior it for Keckless vriving, Failing to Stop ior and opeeding. DRIVING URUNK in | Vefendant through his attorneys, ncLaugt and Jattley, enters a plea of Not Guilty Jury sworn and empaneiled as follows: irs. J. P, Brawley, Young S. Davis, Rom Henderson, John A, venzield, &. KR. Rankin, H, Be Thomas T, Brantley, mrs. Jonn 5, wall, oe eooatt | Brvin, G. CU. mizell, Jonn L, Milnolland, fempleton and ix. L. Hoffman. narge Jury returned a verdict of Guilty a6 ° EMBEZZLEMENT G, Lewis, Defendant through his attorney, 4 os ass, 1 enters a plea of Guilty to Forcible Tres IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT NOVEMBER Tk, 1952 FIRST WHEK ------ Wednesday, ““ovember 5th, 1952 hio, 1728 state vs i Clyde Oscar cage _ wer No. 1793 State vs Augustus Vampbell, Jr. W-21 iNo, 1726 State vs Leroy Goodson Wo. 1727 vtate vs Leroy Goodson Mio. 1725 State vs Sobert Ardis ‘No. 1776 tate vs Henry Williams ‘Wo. 1781, State vs “ichard William Higgins Wo. 1549 State vs “llliam Leroy Smith DRIVING URUNK Vefendant through his attorney, J. G. Lewis, enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. JUUGMiNT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Com.on Jail of Iredell vounty for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under tne supervision of the State Highway and Public works Commission. Tais sentence is suspended for a perioa of tharee Years upon the following expressed condai- tions: 1. ‘that he pay a rine of 3200.00 and pay the cost. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways of the State ot \. . tor a period of Two Years. 3.lhat he remain of general good behavior and not vio ate any law of tne State of NN. bv. for ‘'nree Years. Vapias ana commitment to issue witnout further order of tne Vours in event the fine and costs are not paid at tnis term, otherwise on motion of the Solicitor at any subsequent term within Three Years on proof satisfactory to tae judge then presiding that the defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply witn this judgment. LARUENY Defendant enters a plea of Guilty of Larceny of an Auto. JUUGeeNT of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in tne State Prison at Kaleigh, at hard labor, for a term of not less than THREE (3) nor more than FIVE (5) YsaRs. FAIL TO SfOP FOR S1REN Defendant called and failed. Sei Fa and Instanter Vapias. It is ordered that a report of tnis be sent to the Vepartment of ..otor Venicles, Highway Safety Uivision, Raleign, \\. 0. Jui cment Nisi DRIVInG DRUNK Defendant called and Tailed. Judgment isi Sci fa ad Instanter Vapias. It is ordered that a report be sent to tne Department of motor Vehicles, Highway safety vivision, Raleigh, Ne Ve ASSAULT WITH DiADLY WHAPON Nol Pros With Leave. 4 ABANDON & NON@-SUPPORT Nol Pros with Leave. RAPE Nol Pros with Leave. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias. Aaa meat epitinas co ae enn aa NR aa te a an eon . - a eames ttn ~_— a ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WExK ------ NOVi.BER TERM, 1952 = eo Wednesday ,November 5th, lox GRAND JURY REPORT NOViMBER, 1952 The Grand Jury found True Bills ot Indictment on all cases that were Coumittees were appointed to inspect the rollowing County Properties: County Jail ithe Grand Jury inspecting the Vounty Jail and Vound tne total of 18 prisoners, 11 white men, 6 colored men and 1 colored woman, we find that painting ana repair has been done in the kitchen. Sut mattress covers have not been placed in tne Jail. ‘ne Urand Jury feels this should be done, We wish to comnend ur. Laws for tie fine work that he is doing. vounty Home A Committee visited the vounty Home and found same to be in good omer, All living quarters in excelient condition. Inmates apparently well cared for. Supplies of all kinds in quantity and quality. Barns and farm in good cond tion we find 16 whi as Who. L7h7 } SP£eDING - We find 16 white men, 16 white women, 3 colored men, and 7 colored ayate | Defendant enters a plea oi wuilty. W en | JUDGuLNT of the vourt is that the uerendant women aS Inmates; 2 white men, 2 colored men, and 1 white woman as Prisoners. “—— mi ta | pay a fine or 325.00 ana pay tne cost. { wr, and urs, Sherrill are to be complimented very nishly ior the fine careful work taey are doinc. Prison Vamp 4 committee visited the Prison Vamp on highway 21. we found 87 colored pri ‘ vs sia ss . a S+#4 on prison inmates. All premises and buildings were found clean aml in good conditia. *© Provisions ppli i Sions al. supplies were in abundance. In talking with several prisoners, it was our opinion tnat they were well cared for. Vounty Vourt iliouse tne G _ , ° Pe vrand Jury inspected tae Court House and find the recoomendations mad in Au é t ust nave not been completed, such as P. iu. A. Office walls be water proofed and tne f , loors be covered. Also ‘ine Negro *arm agents Office floor needs 2 covering. the Gra 4 e Grand Jury still recommenda that additional fans should be added in vourt room for summer use, we iind the vourt House in good was repair with the exception of tnese i J. C, Linker _ Foreman 6th, This Hon S Honorable vourt takes a recess until thursday Moming, November ion (CC. Po P JUDGE PRESIDING 1952, at 9:30 O'clock aA. in, Thursday, November 6th, 1952 "his Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday morning, vovember 6th, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A, hi, Coleman Ray Miller we vios. 1792 & 1797 otate vs bill Vingler un 2h lo. 1689 otate vs Glenn L, Setzer W- 4! Wo. 1782 State . vs Joe brawley “orrison passed on that were presented by the Solicitor. wo. 1732 ee } state JUDG WP of the vourt is that tne defendant i v8 be coniined in the Com:.on Jail oi lJredell vounty EN OR EN NP DRIVING DRUNK for a period of FUUR (4) »0nTHS, assigned to work on tne roads under tne supervision of the otate di hway and Public «works Vonmission. ‘his prison sentence is suspended for a perioa af three Years on the following expressed conditions: 1. ‘nat he pay a fine oi #~125.00 and tne cost. 2.- nat be remain of general good benavior and not violate any of tue laws of tne vtate for a period ot Three Years. 3. ‘that he not operate a motor vehicle on tne public nigaways oi tune state ol . ve for a period oi Twelve ontns. Vaplas and coimitment to issue witnout furtier order ol tue vourt in event tue fine ana costs are not paid at tais term, otherwise on motion of tue volicitor at any subsequent term within three years on proof satisractory to the judge then presiding tnat tne defenaant nas failed in wnole or in part to couply witn tuis juagment. BikoAKING, ENTerinG Aw LARULNY ; vefendant through his atvorney, voan it. weLaughlin, enters a plea oi solo vontendere. vnese two cases are consolidateu ior vue purpose of juu mente : SUD unl of the Court is that the Defendant be confined in the Vommon Jail of Iredell County for a term of not less than Three (3) nor more than Five (5) years, to ve assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public works Vo.udiSsion. It is recomended, in view of this aefendant's prior good character, that he oe assigned to the first Offender's vamp. DRIVING DRUNK a Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged. JUDGM:NT of the vourt is tnat tne defendant be confined in tue Vomiuon Jail or Iredell vounty for a period of NINETY (90) DAYS, to be assigned to work on the roads under tne supervision of the State Highway and Public works Coumission. This Prison sentence is suspended for a period of Yhree Years on the following expressed conditions: 1, ‘That he pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost. 2, ‘That he remain of general good behavior and not violate any of tne laws of the “tate for Three Years. 7 , that he not opaate a motor vehicle on the public highways of the State of \. U. for a period of Twelve Months. EMBEZZLEMENT A True sill . Soon a : Ss eee ee 5 “fF = —— = ay _ ed ee rn ee aed coe Auttuncs: iNo. 1782 State vs Joe Brawley orrison iio. 1796 otate vs willie Lee Goss wer \iog 1789 & 1790 otate vs aoy bumgarner Wise Inv THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- NOVEMBER Tim, 1952 thursday, November 6th, 1952 mem em Oe ee FORCIBLE TRESPASS JUDGHENT of the Court is tnat the defend be coniined in the Vommon dail of Iredell - vVounty for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, to bs assigned to work on the roads under the sy vision of the State Highway and Public Neha Commission. The prison sentence is Suspended and tne defendant is hereby placed on probatio for a period of ‘wo (2) Years; That as special conditions of probation ordered by tne Court the defendant shall: 1. Pay the cost of this action. 2. ‘ne defendant snall be given permis. sion to return to tne otate of Virginia under tne reciprocal probation rule. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant enters a plea oi Not Guilty, Jury sworn ana empanelled and returned a a verdict of suilty as charged. JUJGuoNT of tne vourt is tnat the defendant be confined in tne Vommon dail of tredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under tue supervision of tae State dignway and Tublic Works Vonmission. ‘he prison sentence is suspended ior a period of Three Years on the following expressed conditio:s 1. ‘that he pay a fine of $50.00 and pay the cost. 2. shat he remain of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for tnree Years. Vapias and commitment to issue without furtee order oi the vVourt in event the fine and costs are not paid at tnis term, otnerwise on motion 0 tne Solicitor at any subsequent term within tire years on proof satisfactory to the judge then presiding that the defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judguent. DRIVING DRUNK: CARRYING CONCRALED WEAPON “ Vefendant tnrougn his Atterney, John NeLawgalt, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in both cases. these two cases are consolidated for the purpose of judgment. JUDGMENT of the vourt is that tne defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell vouny for a period of Six (6) months, to be assign to work on the roads under the supervision the State Highway and Public works vomumd 660: The prison sentence is suspended 1or a pe of tnree Years on the following expressed 0 tions: 1. ‘that he pay a fine of $200. i n0 2. hat ne i of gmeral good behav yar violate any oi tne laws of the State for a@P of three Years. ‘ele on vi 3. shat he not operate a motor venie Bightect public highways of N. v. for a period of Muiontns,. Vapias and commitment to issue with osts order of t.e vourt in event the fine 4 not son of are not paid at tnis term, otherwise on ni the Solicitor at any subsequent term Witt) we three years on proof satisfactory t° a woole presiding tnuat the defendant has failed or in part to comply with this judgmen' be purse! Sar Misael ; is It is further ordered that the Pty aeqy over to the Ulerk superior vourt of vided for 7 County and advertised and sold as pre law, FIRST w IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEK ---- NOVEMBER TARM, 1952 hyrsday, November 6th, 1952 do. 1700 state vs Ralph V. sho emaker INO. 1710 State vs Donald Wade Yow w-ss” Nig e 1681 °tate vs Wace Donald Yow ‘log, 1792 Mate. * 1797 vs Si) Dineler ee mem ee rm ASSAULT WIth DsaADLY WEAPON On recommendation of the Solicitor and private prosecution, tne Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the vommon Jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of tne State Highway and Public works Vommission. ‘the prison sentence is suspended for a period of Three years on the following expressed conditions: le. +4nat he pay the cost or tne action. 2. «shat he pay into tne office oi: the vierk of Superior Vourt of Iredell vounty the sum of $500.00 tor the .se and venefit of ‘om Kobinson, and tnat, in addition to tne 3500.00, that he pay to tne Lowrance Hospital tne sum of 432.00, expenses incurred oy the said obinson in said hospital. 3. ‘4hat he be of general gooa benavian and n& violate any ot the laws of the State for a periad of three years. Vapias and commitment to issue witout further order or tne vourt on motion of tne Solicitor at any subsequent term within inree Years on proof satisfactory to the vudge then presiding that the dezendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this juagnent. TRANSPORT & POSSESS WONeTAA PalD LICUOR Defendant through his attorney, Jonn mcLaughlin, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled. During the trial tne defendant withdraws his plea of not guilty and enters a plea of solo Vontendere. JUDGMENT of the Vourt is that the defendant be cont'ined in the Vommon Jail of Ireaell County for a period of TWsLVE (12) buWinS, to be assigned — to work on the roads under the supervision oi the State Highway and Public works vo.wiission. +ne prison sentence is suspended for Three Years on the following express conaitions: 1. that he pay a fine of ~200,00 and the cost. 2, «hat he be of general good behavior and not violate any oi tne laws of the otate for a period of three Years, particularly tne he not violate any oi the prohibition laws, and wae he not have in his possession any whiskey, tax-paid or non-tax paid. ae Vapias and commitment to issue without iurther order ot the Vourt in event tne fine and costs are not paid at tnis tern, otherwise 0:: motion of the Solicitor at any suosequent term within three Years on proof satisfactory to the Judge then presiding that the detendant nas failed in whole or in part to comply witn this judgment. MANSLAU GATS. On recommendation of tne Coroner and Patrolman, the Solicitor takes a ol Pros With Leave. BREAKING, ENTSRING & LARUENY Yrue bills. RCA nes nana ee er tude x os tt —<—_ pS > - 7 = A ee er oe ~ ens Fate _ eieiiemetiss Ati i eee : = —* No. 1788 “tate vs Lawrence iiiller W-59 \No. 1752 otate vs Willie Lee Plumer CelLi= Wo. 1735 State vs flora D, bailey Vef'o Inv THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -----NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 ‘imrsday, November 6, 1952 ee me DRIVING DRUNK Vefendant through his attorney Grant Bolmer, enters a plea of Not uuilty, Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Young &. Vavis, J. P. Patterson, John 4. beniield, &. R. sankin, irs, Joun B, wal] le Ye layberry, b. &, wizell, John L, ; milnolland, we. R, anthony, Jas. Lee ix We. G,. Kimbrough and 2b, »o, barkley, Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as cnuarged. JUUGinoN of tue Court is that the defendant be conrined in tne Common Jail of Iredel) vounty for a period of “UR (4) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on tne roads under tie supervision of tn@ otate ..ignway and Public works Conmission. ‘ne prison sentence is Suspenaed ior a period oi ‘uree Years on tit iollowing express conditions: le. suat ue pay a Line or 4100.00 and tie cCOSt. 2.e +at he not operate a motor venicle on tue Public nighways ol tue vtate of i,t, tor a perioa or swelve montis, 3. a:at ne be ot seneral food benavior anu not violate any ol t.ec laws of t@ otate ior ihree Years. Vapias and comaitment to issue without curther oruer of tue vourt in event the fir anu costs are not paia at this tern, othervise on motion oi the Solicitor at any subsequent term within three years on proof satisfactory to the Judge then presiding that the defendat has failed in whole or in part to comply wit this judgment. orri son, MURDER “. R. Battley and suren Jurney were appointed by the vourt to represent tuls defendant. ; Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Vonte to Involuntary Menslaugnater. The Court holds the defendant Guilty of Manslaughter. . JUDGe ENT of the Court is that tne defendatt be confined in tse Vornmon Jail of Iredeld Lounty for a period of EIGHTEEN (18) MONI, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Publie works Commission. ‘he prison sentence is suspended and tae defendant is hereby Peart; on probation for a period of Three (3) riers That as special conditions of probation the by the Court, the defendant shall: 1. Mt cost of tais action on or before 26th day Jan., 1953. (173.70). ndere FALSE PRETENSE J. G, Levis, Defendant through her attorney, ** enters a plea of Not Guilty. : Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: J. G. Harwell, J. & Oxford, Mrs ee gb Alexander, Philip sush, A. “- ae Hughey, mrs. Clara L. Lowery, R, E. B. 3B Rex B, Beaver, Thomas 7. Brantley, wg and Mrs. Jd. P. Brawley. Jury #eturned a verdict of Not Guilty row, 'No. 1786 State vs : ; Gordon Lewis Laws Web Wo. 1750 State vs Henry F, Heglar Wo, 168, State vs waude Lewis ‘No. 1794, otate vs Frances Campbell “nis Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday /orning, at 9:30 o'clock A, Me FIRST WEE Thursday, November 6th, 1952 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT K a---= NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 RECKLESS DRiVI\G Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty through his Attorney, Grant Bolmer. Defendant withdraws his plea of Not Guilty and enters a plea of Wilty. JUDG.ENT of tne Vourt is that the defendant be confined in tne Vommon Jail of Iredell Vounty for a period of SIXTY DAYS, to be assigned to work on the roads under tne supervision of the State Highway and Public works Vonuission, ‘te prison sentence is suspended for a period of ithnree Years on the following expressed conditions: 1. ‘that he pay tne cost of the action. 2. ‘that he pay to James Leroy sades the sum of $171.50 reimbursement for hospital and doctor bills and tne sum of $50.00 for damages to his automovile, the cost to be paid at this term and the sum of 9171.50 medical expense and 950.00 damages to be paid on or oefore tne first day of November ‘erm, 1953. 3. That he be of general good venavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for a period of tnree years. Vapias and comuitment to issue witnout further oroer of the Court in event the fimexand costs are not paia at this term, otherwise on motion of the Solicitor at any subsequent term within three years on proof satisfactory to the judge then presiding that the defenaant has failed in whole or in part to comply witn this judgment. DRIVING DRUNK | Defendant called ana failed. Judgment Nisi Sci ta and Instanter Capias to be sent to Xowan vounty. It is ordered that tne bond be doubled. PUSSESS WON-TAX PaIv LIQUOR he Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty througn ner attaneys, McLaughlin and sattley. Jury sworn and empanelled. At tne close of the State's evidence, the attorneys for the defendant make a motion as ot non-suit. Motion of Non-Suit allowed. LanvbLNY ; ; ; Defendant called and failed. Judgment isi Sci fa and Instanter Uapias. It is ordered that tne bond be doubled. November 7th, 1952, {C. from JUDGE PReSIVING etree OA ES STORE: ; . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Friday, November 7th, 1952 Iv THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK e----- NOVGNBER Tok, 1952 SREP eee a a Fo RSS this Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Friday rriday, November 7th, 1952 “Oorning | November 7th, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A. he Wo. 1778 etate vs Herbert F. McUlelland ve Wos. 1726 & 1727 State vs Leroy Goodson Cer. 22 *No. 1771 State vs Jonn Caldwell wWio. 1772 State vs John Valdwell Vio. 1795 wtate vs J Aly Onn. 3yatdwell “- ! ! | ! 1 ! | ! | | ' | { { I l ! ASSAULT WITH USADLY W2APON Vefendant enters a plea of Guilty to Assault sith a Deadly Weapon through his attorney, J. G,. Lewis JUVJGLENT of the vCourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, to ve assigned to work on the roads under tue supervision of the State Highway and Public works Commission, FAIL TO STOP “OR SIREN aND DRIVING DAUNK vVefendant tnrougn nis attorney, J. G. Lewis, enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and enpanelled as follows: J. G. Harwell, v. & Oxford, mrs. iiarry Alexander, Philip push, A. A. Noover, urs. G. &. dughey, Mrs, vlara L. Lowery, R. & Page, Kex 4. seaver, thonas T. Brantley, «. & brown ana brs. J. P. brawley. Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged, these two cases are consolidated for the purpose or judsment. JUUGhiNT of the Court is that tne defendant be confined in the Vommon Jail of Iredell County fora period of SIX (6) mMOnT’S, to ve assigned to work on tne roads under tne supervision of the State Highway ana Public works vomdission., The prison sentence # suspended for a period of Three Years on the follody express conditions: l. ‘hat he pay the cost or this action anda fine of $150.00 and the cost. 2. ‘tnat he not operate a ma@or vehicle for a peris of Eighteen (18) months on tie public hghway of the etate of Ne. U, 3. hat he be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State of Ni, . for three Years, Vapi and commitment to issue without further omer of tne Vourt in event the fine and costs are not paid at this term, otherwise on motion of the solicitor t any suosequent term within three years on proof Satisfactory to the Judge then presiding that the i agefendant has failed in whole or in part to comply ¥-" this judgment, FalL TO STOP FOR SIREN Nol Pros With Leave. ROUKLESS DKIVING Nol Pros with Leave. POSLESS NONeTAX PAID LIQUOR Vefendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere ero? his attorney, w, K, Battley. Prayer for Judgment continued for 4 period « rIVe (5) Years. fo, 1765 otate frank James Owens bm 35 Ho, 1672 otate vs ‘illiam Thompson Ho, 174, State vs ‘illard L Jison - 40, 1777 state vs ‘nad (B Bud) Lambert TRANSPORTING Vefendant through his attorney, W. RK. Hattley, enters a plea of Nolo Vontendere. JUDGMiNT of the Court is tnat the defendant be coniined in the Vommon Jeil of Iredell County for a period of BIGHT (8) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the state Highway and Public Works Commission, ihe prison sentence is suspended for a period of Three Years on tie following expressed conditions: 1. That he pay a fine or $100.00 and pay the cost. 2. that he not operate a motor vehicle on tne public highways oft tue State of \. v. for a period oi twelve months. 3. That the sotor Venicle waich was wed for transporting liquor in this case be confiscated and sold as provided by law. 4. ‘tnat he be of general good denavior and not violate any of the laws of the state for inree tears. Vapias and commitment to issue witnout further omer of tne Court in event tne fine ana costs are ot paid at this term, otherwise on motion of the solicitor at any subsequent term witnin three years on proot satisiactory to tne Judge tnen presiding that tue iefendant has failed in wnole or in part to comply vith this judguente DRIVING URUNKA Defendant throurh hi a plea of Not wuiilty. Jury sworn ang cmpanelled as follows: Young >. Vavis, Romie Henderson, Joun A. sentield, E. x. Rankin, Mrs John 38, Wall, Mrs. i. H. orvin, UC. ©, Mizell, W. F. Anthony, 4“. ™. Lazenoy, vs L. bunch, B. S. Barkley and James Lee orrison. Verdict of Not Guilty. attorney, J. G. Lewis, enters CARNAL KNOWLEDGE } Nol Pros “ith Leave. DRUNK & OLSORJERLY Continued. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY Continued. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, Novexber 10th, 1952, e Me Lo. UIN IN TH SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---=- NOVWKBER uk, 1952 uonday, Novemper 10th, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA, IN HE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL COUNTY. NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjourmment on Monday Morning, November 10th, 1952 at 10:00 o'clock, with Honorable U. K. hoore, Judge Presiding and holding Vourts of tnis the "ifteenth Judicial Vistrict, fall Tern, 1952, present and presiding. J. GC. kumple, Hich Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Vourt the names of the following good ana lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the second week or the November Term, 1952, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: Mrs. laude Gillespie J. *, resperman Roy J. Thompson J. G. Stikeleather urs. Ruby Dbunton J. O. Pharr toy Thomas R. E. Cranford W. B. Chambers 2. Gordon Wallace Jack V. vook w. L. Gallimore J. F. Rimmer vecil Lackey Vance Vliver A. L. Lowrance W. R. Holland O. L. Lippard T. &. weNeely liarvin Sigmon tT. A. Harris a. 0. Clark G. P. Holland Mrs. Ruth WwW. Steel urs A, E, ritzgerald John T. Gillespie H. J. Sat'riet H. B. Moore . nai « C. Vixon Archie Bost T. E. McNeely was excused sy the Court, irs, X, & *itzgerald was excused. Marvin Sigmon was excused to January Term, 1953. Joan |, Gillespie was excused Vance Uliver was wax excused. O. L. Lippard was excused. the following men and women constitue what shall hereafter be term the Jivorce Jury #1" to-wit: Mrs. Maude Gillespie, J. G. Stikeleatner, Roy Thomas, x» G W i 2p . ordon Wallace, Jd. F, simmer, a. Ly Lowrance, S. U. Clark, H. B. Moore, J. re ‘es 4 ’ “+ #esperman, irs, Xuby Bunton, R. &. Crawford and Jack V. Cooke No, 5330 “ae Snetye | DIVORCE vs The Vivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it 4 Ola Sharpe follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---= NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952 No. 5330 Yorth Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Novemper, 1952, ‘erm Vomma Sharpe, i Plaintiff | vs | ISSUES Qla Sharpe, | Vefendant i 1. Did the plaintiff and tne defendant intermarry as aileged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2, Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for two years immediately preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes 3, Has the plaintiff been a resident of tne State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: _Yes North Varolina In the Superior vourt Iredell County November, 1952, term Comma Sharpe, Plaintiff VS. | JUDGMENT Or ABSOLUTE viVORCE Ola Sharpe, | Defendant This cause coming on to be heard at the Regular Novemper, 1952, Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Uarolina, and being heard before tne undersigned Judge Presiding and a jury and tne jury having answered the following issues as indicated and as appear in tne record, viz" 1, Vid tne plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Vomplaint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for two years immed‘ itely preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e--- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Monday, November 10th , 1952 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina ¢ or more than six months preceeding tne commencement of this action? Answer: yes It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretotore existing between the plaintiff ana the defendant be, and they are hereby, dissolved and tnat tne plaintiff be, ana ne is hereby granted a absolute divorce from the defendant. Dan K, Moore Juage Presiding No. 5338 Violet G. Noakes DIVORCE the Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it ; as follows: frederick Noakes 1 | vs j | ! NORTH GVAXOLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TRivELL COUNTY NU Via iBER To.M, 1952 Violet G. Noakes Vs ISSUES frederick Noakes Vid ae ; ; -* : . ° : 1. wid tne plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer, Yes 2 7 Did n 4 , . ° , ia the defendant separate from the plaintiff ana have tney lived separate and apart j : a part for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Vomplaint? Answer, Yes 3- Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more that si . " - ‘ sas Sl1X montis next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer, Yeg ere ree NORTH CAROLIWA ” IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY , NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Videt G, Noakes ' vs | JUDGMENT Frederick Noakes | | This cause Coming on to be heai r Term, 1952 d and being heard at the Novembe “uperior Court of Iredell ¢ U . ‘? Ounty, before iiis Honor, Dan K, Moore, Judge 7" hh oe siding, ™ In THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- NOVGMBER TukM, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952 ‘ury and tne jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the ravor of a Juba plaintiff ana against tne defendant, as fully appears in the record; and it tne apvearing to the vourt that there was oom of the marriage of the plaintifi anda tne jefendant a child, Alice “osetta woakes, anu tnat the plaintiff herein has the are and custody ol saia @hild; and it furtner appearing to the Court and the vourt finds as a fact that tne plaintiff is a rit and suitable person to have the custody + and control of the minor child, “lice -‘osetta Noakes, and tnat tne vest interest of said minor would serve by being in tne custody of her motser, she being found to be a fit person for the custody of said minor. Wu It is, tmerefor, ordered, adjudged ana decreed tna. the ponas of matrimony wretofore existing between the plaintiif ana defendant be, and tne salie are hereby dissolved, and tue plaintifr is hereby granted an absolute divorce iron. the jefendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed tuat We plaintiff, Vio.et i, Nokes, be and she is hereoy awarded full and complete care, custody and control of the minor child, Alice Rosetta Noakes. this cuase, in so far as it relates to the custody ol tue winor child, is ree- tained for further orders. fhis the 10 day of November, 1952. Van ... Moore Judge /resiaing NO. 5346 tva Jane viorrison Davis, DIVORCE Yhe Divorce Jury ” empanelled answers tne issues su as follows: #1" being duly sworn and bmitted to it “illiam Vavis NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY iva Jane Morrison Davis, Plaintiff, Vs. ‘illiam Vavis ; Defendant. 1, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North “arolina for at least six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes et pita Sax pea ea 7 aos pa 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 onday, November 10th, 1952 2, Were the plaintiff am the defendant lawfu}ly married as alleged in tne Complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Have tne plaintiff and tne defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH UsaROLINA TREVSLL COUNTY ova Jane morrison Vavis, Plaintiff, VSe William Vavis, Defendant. this cause coming on to be heard moore, Judge Presiding, ana a jury at t Iredell County, and it appearing to the served with process and the jury having NOW, LiisitPORE, on the motion ot IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JUDG ENT and being heard before His honor, Dan 4. ne “ovember Term of the Superior Court of Court that the defendant has been properly answered the issues submitted to them by © Land, Sowers & Avery, attorneys for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, iva vane ‘orrison Javis, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from t William Vavis, and nat tne bonds of matrimony heretofore existing betwee and the defendant be and they are dissolved. It is furtner ordered and adjudved that the plaintiif pay the ce action to be taxed by the vlerk, tnis the 10 day of w vember, 1952, ost of this Van Kh, “oore Judge Presiding The following were sworn as talesmen jurors for the week: JC Fox WJ Matheson E E Johnson re he defendant, n the plait IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e--- NOVanBER THRin, 1952 Monday, ‘ovember lOth, 1952 Wo, 5350 John William Alexander DIVORUE The Jvivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn am vs empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: idna H, Alexander WORTH GAROLINWA In the superior Vourt IREDELL COUNTY John William Alexander VS. Edna H. Alexander I Has the plaintiff been a resident oi theotate of wortu Varolina for more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Vv Answer: {es il Were tte plaintifi ana defendant married as alleged in the vomplaint? Answer: Yes III Were the plaintiff ana defendant separated, and have they lied separate a lini aa ale a Cc al and apart continuously for two years next preceding tne mtitution ol this action: Answer: Yes WORTH CAROLINA In the Superior vVourt IREDELL vOUNTY Yonn William Alexander Vs. | JUDGMENT “dna ii, Alexander | kh, soore, Judge This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable Van Presiding over the November Civil v'erm 1952 Iredell Vounty Superior Court, and being moore, and a Jury, the following issues heard oefore said Honorable Van kh. "ere submitted to the Jury: ale Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state of North Carolina for more th -_ ‘ a1 six months next preceding the institution of this action? -2= Nere tne plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --e--- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952 -3- were tne plaintiff ana defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding tne institution of this action? the Jury having answered all of said issues "Yes", It is, therefore, by the vourt ordered, aa judged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and tne defendant be foreye, ijissolved, and tne plaintiif is hereby granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant, Ldna i. alexander, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by tue vlerk. + Jan Kh, Moore Judg* Fresiding Wo. 5351 Gaynell LU, Wants JIVORLE the Divorce Jury 1" being duly sworn and -VS- empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Homer A, Nantz NUE SH vacULina IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT LAGU GOUT Y Gaynell vu. Nantz, Plaintiff, -VS- Homer a, Nantz, Vefendant, > a 4 e2on » : ? 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in tne vomplaint Answer. Yes «» Have tne plaintiff ana defendant lived Separate and apart from each ft . tres oe . . . or two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes 3- Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North varolina fa six months immediate " S © ammediately preceding the commencement of this action? answer, es IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK-----NOVEMBER TuRM, 1952 Monday, November lOth, 1952 yoRTH CAROLINA In’ THE SUPERIOR CUURT TagDELL COUNTY iibevais “iia, Se Jaynell U. Nante, Plaintiff, | -VS- Homer A. Nantz, Jefendant. | This cause coming on to ve neard petore tne undersipmed Judge holding the recular term of Iredell Superior vourt and a jury, and the jury having answered tae issues suomitted to tnem in favor oi tne plaintiff and against the defendant, as appears in the record; It is, therefore, or iered, considered adjudged tiuat tue bonas of ; narriage heretofore existing between tue plaintiff and tne defenaant be, and the salle are hereby dissolved and set aside, and the Plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from tne defenaant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay tne costs of this action. This 10 Nov. 1952. Van 4“, s.oore Judge Presiuing. Wo, 5353 Willie G, icUlain, DIVORCE | See oe fhe UVivorce Jury #1" being auly sworn and Plaintiff, a empanelled answers tne 1S5Sues submitted to it Vs, Tae 2 as follows: 4na flowers Mollain, Defendant. NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior TIRED ELL COUNTY, November verm Willie u, “cvlain, Plaintiff, “18 Flowers Mevlain, 1 I Vs, { ! ' Defendant, . , s l. Vid the plaintarf, Willie G. AcClain, and the devendant, Ing Flower hey ; lain, intermarry as alleged in tne complaint? ANSWER Yes | THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THY SUPHRIOR COURT asi =. ta Caer TERM, 1952 a ease Oe " Monday, “ovember lOth, 1952 \ ’ ‘ , : inds from the atfidavit of tne plaintiff, that the 2, have the plaintiff, Willie @. Mclblain, and tne defendant, Ina flowers The Court further find ’ : tne j i f tais 7 MeLlain, was not at the time of tne institution o j ived separate and apart frou each otner for two Consecutive years ndant, ina flowers } ‘ licUlain, lived separate a defe 3sghe now, nor has she been at any time since the institution of f j i i nor a , immediately prior to tne commencement of tnis action? action, TET . mre a a i nisin mee tion, in the military service of tne United States oi America. wip is ac ’ ANSWER _ Yes this ’ 'HBREFORE, CONSIVERSD, ORDERED, ADJUDGED aND DEUREED , That the 3 as the plaintiff, Willie G, mevlain, been a bona lide resident of If Is, 1: . the eee > matrimony heretofore existing between tne plaintiff and tne defendant . - “ F oil m of sort. Carolina sor six months immediately preced ng the commencement o; ponds i the plaintiff 13 mevlai is granted be, and they are dissolved, and tuat tue plaintiff, Willie u, wcrlain, g oe, ve tion? solute divorce from tne delendant, Ina flowers i.ctlain. Let tne cost of an ab - _ es CA A I A TTI this action be paid by tne plaintiff. This the 10th day ot November, 1952. in tne Superior vourt Van hh. +-oore Judge rresidaing November ‘Yerm 1952 Eg () 5 Ji VORULE : ‘WU, 5 . ao 't at} ily swor! ed [Tne vivorce dury #1 oein duly swo Harry Uharles empanelied auswers tne issues submivt @ . = ° as follows: vs ea an eing heard by His Honor Dan 4, Hoore, tarion U. vharles s AL Ms > A ‘ ~ é > , . ; > ell cn ake oki ‘ 7 “ior Vourt for sred a Jur 79 =Y LhnAe nwoVvenoer termi, 1952, euper 2 NVUALN VAROLI: A ; , , , ial . oO, and + , - varolina, and the following issues having been submitted to, IREDELL COUNTY by the jury, to-wit: Harry Charles, Plaintiff : ' Lon . ‘ . . : flowers 1, Wid the plaintiff, Willie G. weClain, and the defendant, ina : vs, MeUlain, intermarry as a leged in the complaint? ; “€rion 0. Gharles, Defendant ANSWER Yes e e } j i p> Ss plaint? | ad g £° 4° 3 ‘Oo nt arried as al leged an ovune oly 2 H V l i eS t deie t na fF lowers + were tne plaintiii dei endant m ’ . ave tne p aint ict i ie U Cvia in ana ne c x naan ’ C 4 » e 4s , 1a2 ; 7 . : j ears “cvlain, lived separate and apart from eacn otner for two consecutive y 4nswer. Yes immediately prior to the coumencenent of tnis action? . - ate and apart from each other 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate ana a} ANSWER Yes — 228. f ' > this action? ‘Or two y recedi comme cement of this a 3- Has the plai ty, Wi ‘lai bona fide resident of we years next preceding Ori - Has the pimintiff, Willie G, mcUlain, been a State of North J this action? of : gs . a. - sa nenc ement arolina for six montuas immediately preceding the comme Answer, Yes ; . ¢ -ate oi North Varolina ior 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of tue »tate o: | ANOWEK Yes —23 + . s 9 J Six monthe ¢ : , . f this action: ‘ti tf ehe defendant by “oH Six months iumediately preceding the commencement ol ne vourt further finds that summons was duly served on 1952, 4nswer, Yes, “igmon, Veputy Sheriff of ; ~ . i r ll, vatawba Vounty, worth Carolina, on Septembe ‘ jaint. oy delivering to t ief P comp he defendant a copy oz the summons and a copy of the vo i ynion ene vourt further finds that no children were born to the marriage of the plaintiff and defendant in this action, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952 NORTH VAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR vOURT TRevsbL vuuntly November Term, 1952, at Harry vnarles, Plaintiff, j | VSe I JUDGMENT warion O. Unarles, Vefendant. | i This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell Superior vourt and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to tuem in favor or the plaintiff and against tne defendant, as appears in the record; t is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that t:e bonds of l ‘ marriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the Same are hereby dissolved and set aside, and tne flaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defenaant, It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of tnis action, Dan K, hoore JUDGE PReolvING. wR HM HK HK MK OK OK OK “x Om Wo. 5359 Mearle Glenn Wwycoff VIVORUE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: vs “ose L. Wycoff NORTH UAROLINA THE SUPE R COURT IREDELL COUNTY In THE SUPERIO Mearle Glenn Wycoff Plaintiff — ISSUES | | Rose L. Wycoff | Defendant j rete . ? 1. Were the plaintirf and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint Answer. Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from oom oth 4 ‘ ner tor two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes : 3- Has the plaintirs been a resident of the State of North Carolina for si Linn ° +x months inmediately preceding the commencement of this action? ie Answer. Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SEUOND WEEK ----- NOVEMBER TER, 1952 Monday, ‘November 10th, 1952 In THE SUPEXIOR VUOURT yoRTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY jlenn Wycoff Mearle Gle Plaintiff | | vs JUDGMENT oe - { L. wycoff 7“ 7 Defendant ! This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell superior Vourt and a jury, and tne jury having answered tne issues submitted to them in favor o1 tne Plaintiff and against tne defendant, as appears in tne record; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that tne oouds of marriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defenaant be, ana the same are hereby dissolved and set aside, and the Plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that tne plaintiff pay tne costs of this action. Van A, “oore ~ Judge Presiding. Kee KK KK KOK KK HK OK Wo, 5362 Kita F or ee “ee Jury #1" being duly sworn and “ empanelled answers the issues submitted to it i | as follows: James Edgar sruce j NORTH GAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CuURT TRsDiLL U OUNTY Kita Feimster bruce, Plaintiff | Vs, i .oaree Janes edgar Bruce, Vefendant | l. Vid the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are thy now husband and wife, as alleged in tne Complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and live separate and apart from eac ore than 4 other, and have they lived separate and apart from each otaer for m *Wo years Continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes ee : Varolina 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonafide resident of the state of North Va ‘OF more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes pti’ (a ) a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOViiliBixt TERI, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952 NORTH VaROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDsLL COUNTY NOVEL.BER TERM Kita “eimster bruce, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT James Edgar bruce, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Vourt or Iredell County, “orth Carolina, before tis Honor, Van kK, moore, Juave Presiding, and a Jury, and tue Jury naving answered the issues suomitted to it by tne vourt in favor or the plaintiff and against tne defendant , as set out in the records. It is tnerelore, ordered and adjudged oy the Vourt that tne bonds of matrimony neretofore existing between the plaintiff, Kita reimster bruce, and tne defendant, Yames edgar Biuce, be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintifr is granted an absolute divorce from tne defendant. Van K, lioore Judge Presiaing \No.5362 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERTOR vulval TReVELL COUNTY Kita veiuster sruce, Plaintirf | VS. t ORDER FOR CUSTODY Of MINOR CHILD James cdgar bruce, Vefenaant | This cause coming on to be heard, and being neard by Hon. Dan K. Moore, vudge Presiding, at the November erm, 1952, Iredell Vounty, euperior vourt, and it appearing to tne Vourt and tae Court finaing as a fact: s ‘nat s s nas oe ° o = Ff y e 1 cual one winor child, namely william vavidson sruce, was oorn to tA nion o1 Ki ‘eing — ; : Union of Alta seinster bruce and James sdgar bruce, said cnila now being three years ol age, ) at T ul , . : ‘ and shat AG uinor caila is now living with his mother, tne plaintiff, ,nat sai ] chi i } : * ‘ nn : } S ild lived wita his wotuer ever since the plaintiff and vane aei 11 al pa aGe a ” j enaant separateu on or ab ut vcne lita day of Larch, 1949, and that we Said time the defenda ‘ . lelendant, James idgar Bruce, has contributed nothing for the Support and maintenance of said child, and that said child has been wholly Supported and :.aintained by ; ns ; P aintained by the mother, Kita reimster brucee IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT SE FUND Watt = o= an = NOVieBER TEs, 1952 Monday, November 1Cth, 1952 he Court further finds as a fact tuat Kita veinster bruce, tne mother 36 said caild, is @ fit and suitable person to nave the custody and control said minor cnild, ana tnat tne best interest of said child would be served py tne child being in tne control of tne movner at tauis time, IT IS TaRSYORL, ORUExeD, AvGLOGED and Doutiud: 1, what Kita Feiuster bruce, tne plaintifi, motner of the minor cnila, be, and sne is hereby granted tae custody and control oi tae minor child, william Davidson Bruce 2, That the plaintiff pay the cost of tne proceeding. 3. this cause is retained for furtuer orders, including tie custody of the child. It is further appears to the Court tuat tne aoove entitled action was brought by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant upon the grounds of two years separation, and tnat tue ae.endant filea no answer praying for the custody of tue minor child, and that a judgment granting tae plaintiff au: absolute divorce from the defendant has already been entered at this term of the Iredell County superior Court. Thais tae 10th day of sovember, 1952. Dan «a, Moore Juage Presiding * Mo. 5366 Hugh . Sharpe DIVORUE ; , The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and - empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Oatie Mae Sharpe North Carolina In the superior Vourt Tredel] County November, 1952, ‘erm Hugh MM, Sharpe, Plaintiff vs, Vefendant : 9 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? 4“nswer : ye s 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendantlived separate and apart for two Years immediately preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes In THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----= NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Monday, November lOth, 1952 3. Has tne plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes North Carolina In the ouperior Court Iredell Vounty November, 1952, erm, Hugh “, oharpe, Plaintiff VS. JUDGMENT Or ABSOLUTE DIVORCE Oatie Mae oharpe, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard at tne Regular November, 1952, Term of ouperior vourt for Iredell County, North Varolina, and being heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding and a jury and the jury having answered the follow ing issues as indicated and as appear in the record, viz: 1. Wid the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and tne defendant lived separate and apart for tw years immediately preceeding tne commencement ofthis action? answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more tnan six months next preceeding the conmencement of this action? It is, therefore, ordered, adjudgeu and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are hereby, dissolved and that the plaintiff be, and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Van K, Moore Judge Presiding Ku‘ OM me mK eK me me me me IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- NOVMBER TERM, 1952 Monday, November 10th, }952 ho. 5398 doose, by and through her Sar priend, > L. “oose, Plaintiff DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers tie issues submitted Vs. to it as follows: Jonn Ross Bowie, Defendant WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREVELL vOUNTY Sarah Moose, by and tnrough her oo next friend, D. L. Moose, Plaintiff | 1 1, Wid tne plaintiff and defendant attemp to enter into a marriage contract Vs. Jonn Ross Bowie, Defendant as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes 2. If so, did the defendant, at tnat time, have a living wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonaride resident of the State of orth varolina for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY November ‘erm °arah “ose, by and througn her next friend, D. L. “o0se, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGiIatNT vonn Koss bowie, Vefendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the ; T h : r i Mo “uperior Court of Iredell County, “orth Carolina, betore His Honor, Van K, Moore, Yudge Presiding, and a Jury, and tne Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Gourt in favor of the plaintiff ana against the defendant, as set cut in the records, It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the vourt, that the ourported harry io ‘ ; nn “oss ‘arriage Contract between tne plaintiff, Saran “moose, and the detiendant, Jonn IN THe SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- NOVLIBER TERM, 1952 Monday, November lOth, 1952 Bowie, was and is absolutely null and void, and it is therefore, ordered ’ adjudged and decreed wnat taeplaintiff end defendant are not nusband and wife e . Van K, hoore Judge rresidng a a ae a a * Wo. 5368 UI VORVE The Vivorce Jury #1" being duly swom and empanelled answers tne issues submitted to it as follows: Hattie ..ae Lackey vs urnest LecLackey NORTH UsROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IRpve2LL COUNTY Hattie mae Lackey { Plaintiff vs ISSUES Ernest Lee Lackey Defendant ! 1. “ere tne plaintiff and defendantlawitully married as alleged in the vomplaint? answer: Yes 2 Have tne plaintiff and defendant lived separate anu apart from each other for two years (2) next preceeding tne commencement of this action? answer: Yes ‘ 3 Nas the plaintiff been a bona fide resident and citizen of the vtave of Norta varolina for a nerioa of six montns next preceeding tne co.uencenent of this action. answer: Yes . LL NORTH VAanULIWA Iv tik SUPERIOR oo LAEVELL VUUNTY iattle wae Lackey ' Plaintiff ie I ' ; JUDGHENT “rnest Lee Lackey YVelendant i This cause coming on to be honor Dan & heard ana being heard before His a.00re ’ Jud fe “resid 1d . ' as r vourt residing and a jury, at the November Term of 1952 Superio for Iredell County, North varolina, and it appearing to the Vourt that the In THE SUPERIOR COURT ai SECOND WEEK ----- NOV.GER Torin, 1952 iuonday, November lOth, 1952 fendant nas been properly served with process, ana the following issues having ae been submitted to, and answered by the jury; 1, “ere the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the e complaint? Answer: _YeS ___. 2, Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each . -_ Z other for two years (2) next preceeding tne commencement of tnis action? Vall . Ps Answer: _ Yes . 3. Has tue nlaintifr been a bona ride resident and citizen of the otate or worth Uarolina for a period or six months next preceed ng tne Coiu.encenment ot tnais action? Answer: _ Yes_. ihe Vourt finds from the complaint and evidence oi tne plaintifr, nattie ae Lackey, that the dew‘endant, ernest Lee Lackey, was at tne tine o! tne institution of this action and is now in the “rmed orces of the vnited otates, out that he was not in the Armed roreces of the United States at tne time ol tne separation oi tne parties to this action as alleged in tne complaint. the Court further finds that tne defendant did not make a personal appearance in this action, but in accordance with the Soldiers and Sailors Civil selief «act, *itle 50, App. Sec. 501, et. seq, U.5.U.A., this vourt, pefiore tne trial of tnis #4 . so : 3 ie 4 L iui action, upon the application of tne plaintiff, appointed “. A- hedrick, “squire, practicing attorney of Statesville, Worta Varolina, to represent tne defendant inthis action and that the said &. A. iedrick, Esq., filed a written report, Setting forth that after an investigation of this action, that it was his opinion that tne trial of this action, and the granting oft an avsolute divorce to tne plaintili, ’ ‘ 1 ‘a 11 an Uné ne would not work an in“‘ustice or undue hardship on the deiendanv, ana at t defendant has not been materially effected oy the reason of his military service rr furtner finds tnat the regarding his ability to conduct his defense; and tne Vourt furtner finds tnat ate ' , glad eti spresented attorney for the defendant was present at tne trial of this action and repr the defendant, ‘ ; ‘ eli Lac] age three years, the Gourt further finds that one child, Joan Belinda Mackey, Af wa S ; : “— ws I4¢ ssides with her movner, Ss oorn ol tais marriage; that said child now lives and resides h ; > e + that the "Me plaintiff; that the said child is receiving support from the catengner laint ; ” oo st and control of Paintif? is a fit and proper person to have the sole care, custody, 2 SS AE Se SEPT z xe ei th Pa a Ae | + | i Ula IN TH& oOUPERIOR VCUURT IN Th SUPERIOR COURT OLUOND With \-— NOVEM BAK TER, 1952 SECUND WEEK eee02 WOVuBER Thit., 1952 “onday, “ovember lOth, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952 he said chila; and that tne defendant is not resisting the plaintifst if HB plaintiff's prayer ho, 3164 i i tnat she have tne sole Cu stody Oo. saia ehild, orta Us rolina, In tne “uperior vourt, | i aa cal it bey i) cae i ' : 4 dhe vourt rurtuer Tinas taat tne rights of tne defendant nave not deen Iredell Vountye Novenoer Lorm, 1952 1a ae | , Fk a eit ‘ , — = : Hi Catid taken advantage of anu viat no Injustice nas been done to the defendant in tajs #, v, Varden | if i 5 ” Q) | \ 1 poe i ‘ nas i: 2 . . . Hi ction ranting t relief prayed lor oy tne plaintiff in her complaint VS i ane 4 ata a e ' } A} i a : . . . . ; : ial Qe sy ; | DE | It is, tuerefore, oraered, aujuuged, and decreed, that the bonds of Jlarence Stimpson, T's a ij \ k UA ie - — a ; ale i Vimy | iatrimony nerevolore ex1svuin 2en the plaint ae re ke a : . ‘ as : i . ; : i bu Wek ei . , " _— venues plaintiff, Hattie sae wackey, and the This cause coming on ior trial at the aforesaid erm of Llredaell ouperior : met | & mi ta defendant wsrnest +e LAC K ( issol 2d anc "he said +4 : . * : | | » | i Bn | : ~ 7s 99 Cees Se Se eee ee ee ee vourt before the undersignea vudge, and it appearing to tne vourt that tne Plaintiff t § } i ny ¥ f } Hitet iat } Ml ee hereby grontea an adsolute uivorce from the defendant, srnest Lec La . ++ Lee teh ails a) dw ial i, tie rae : th wit [| a gies : ’ ec Mackey; and it was called by tne oneriff to come in ana prosecure wills action or ne would be a Rw aE ae i I 1s iurtner ordered tnat tne Saia iattie mae LaAcCKey be grantea, and she is nereoy non-suited, and it appearing that tne nlaintiir failed and neglected to appear and + he granted, the sole care, custody, ana control of tne said child, Joan “elinda srosecute tuis action: Hh i Lackey, until the furtier order of tnis vourt. It is tnerefore ordered, adjudged ana decreed that this action be, and the j ! It is furcner orderea tnat tne vlerk of the Superior Court ror Jredell same is nereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed wita tne costs. | | ; vounty, “orta Varolina, tax tne costs of this action in tne sum of Fifty and no/l0 tunis the 10th day of November, 1952. i, i i li Jollars as a reasonable attorney's fee for tne nonorable «4, 4.“edrick, ssq. for ais PA eS OE reer . sau | JUDGE FrkoolViNG (ih i ne 0s services in tnis action; and that the costs of this action be taxed against tue plaintiff, Ol 4OVe, 1952. Van Kk, Moore Wio. 3877 dudge Presiding ie Worth varolina, In the Superior vourt, “ % ; Iredell Vounty ovemper Term, 1952 5. INo. 2628 11 vounty. 7 . " iia | h. G, Yorton, dr. | i) Webb ath Ulu sud i Lilia, In tne Superior vourt, ; T | ih vs. i JUDGHENGE movil YVUUN 7 T Pe rT, November Term, 1952 Slanche Geneva Dorton i J. H . Harris vs. ; 1 JUDGHENT This cause coming on for trial at the atoresaia erm oi Iredell superior Anita Korts - me : vourt before tue undersigned Judge, and it appearing to tue Vourt that the this cause coming on for Sa] e rior vou ling on ior trial at ) »S: ‘e ] supe , : al at tue avoresaid Term of iredel P and prosecute tais action or he ste 4aintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in an belore tne undersic dc : . ' inti * Simned vudge, ana it appearing to tue Vourt that the Plain would } ‘ntiff failed am neg ected 5 i d be non-suited, and it a earins that tne plaintal Lalic ar i sl was cailed by th po 4 , none S$ cailed by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute tnis action or he would ” to any f pear and »rosecute tuis action: Suited, and it anve: and ’ ts caring that t -~ * cic he am ; , noear : & tnat tue plaintiff railed and neglected to 4pP It decreed that this action be, and the is therefore ordered, adjudged and prosecute tnis action: cai si Same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed witn tne costS. S tnerefor der i 3 ‘erelore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action bé@, 7 This tne 10th day of November, 1952. same 18 er eby dismissed, an ; +o and ti e Hla ‘n . - ts ’ i@ plaintiff is taxed with the cosvse Dan “, “oore JU UGS TREoOLULNG this tie lOth dav of ‘ I é of 7" an d “Ovember, 1952. Jan 4, +oore JUDGE PRESLU ING Mii DERTO! Tipm ’ TID - ‘ m om In The SUPLETOR VoURT IN Ti SUPizxLOR COURT VR OD Wil mem IV ibEn diutls, 1952 SpUVww Wilbi, wwmerm NU VL Hast distiti, 1952 “onday, ‘iovember lOth, 1952 lionday, November Ih, 1952 W | io In tne sunerior vourt oon , : , wen CA Li ee ’ Nerth C rolina, In the ouperior Court, worta Varolina, J OVE TNE ,ern 9 Iredell JOUNTY e ove nmer erin, 1952 Iredell vounty. wovember Lerm, 1952 A 2-5) em UNN RNa ETIRD- eats OO nooner Kathleen Ve “120 i anette RR Pte aT Sy “obert «arshall } VS e ¥LUuean SE Roy L. l.ize iayali 4 Ny Mae elias ? aa | . : , hi anee coming on ror trial at tne aloresaica i £ni8 ¢c ux aboreSaliu term of ireuell superior eae cause OO = : - t ’ © r ~ ' © ~ ct r b }. so ct ¢ t Ry sourt betore t nuersicned vudve, ana it appear.ug to tne vourt that the Jourt before the + Wiha td Plaintiit was called by tne onerili to come in and prosecute tnis action or he tuaat tae plaintiff failed and neglected ind aecreed that this action be, and the It ix refore orderes, SED SAP AS } ¢ > 4 aM D £ A a b c 2 © + 2 * » t . oO t ~ taxed witn tne costs. Van 4, ..00re 7 ee NN ee neem e J | 1% . Mood isu JUJGE PRuol U LivG lo. 4034 In the Superior Court, lerth Caro) 4 wa —s VY ~s “ > =SORSls YOURS» Noven.ber erm, 1952 ‘redell County. Yallie voard salliard VS. ‘irce Salliard alias 1 Kataleen martin Uruse ‘irgel Salliard 4n1S cause comin On Lor trial] ‘ yresai i t tired ll superior Ls I L at tae a.oresaida 4erm oO This trial at Cause coming on for tria aforesaid Term of Iredell superir soit nders74 ee Bo ll ie ‘ wrt tnat tne nite ndersigned Judge, and it appearing to the vourt taat rt before the undersigned du ANA i it appeari to tae that the e, and it appearing vO UI sourt t i , ; ; ' ‘ son or ne ; : ; yA VY Yin wneril to come j a rosecute tnis ac ion 9 rosecute tnis action or He Come in —wa prosec 1 pi osecuve ‘Aaintirf was called by the Sheriii to come in an woul ve MONn@=s ite 1, 4 ‘ , o* scale a = j Cg ected uC H luted, and it appearing that tne plaintiff failed ane negl woul : ‘ ; he plaintiff failed and neglected to wee be non=suited, and it appearing | aj tne psddiily ad appes 9 1 bei 7 q , d the rear amd prosec te this action: vee re orae 1G ; aot a a i i 4 n e an | . | | | rea, aajucged ; 1. decreed that tnis actio ’ It is ‘ . : ad wdred and decreed Hhat this action be, anda “he L S tnerefore ordere i, a i jud e and r with tne costS.e Same © is hereby dismissed, and the plaintifi is taxed this ue lUth day of wovember, 1952. Var i. +.00Te JUDGE PRESLULNG Van KK, “oore JUDCE PRooVING aug SAP erat ee Ee a ees eee ieiieetinch appum nee cianee sees toe v NO. 439k North Varolina, Iredell vounty. vharlie Louis Kim VSe IN THE oUPERIOR COURT OB ND Wittsk own ae NO ViWiBER TERI 4 1952 lionday, November 10th, 1952 In the Superior vourt, November Term, 1952 brough ielen Feimster Kimbrougn on ror trial at tue aforesaiu ‘term of Iredell Superior vourt before tae undersipned Judase, am it appearing to tne vourt tnat the Plaintiff was callea oy a 1 ) WOULQG VLC tne Sheriff to come in ana prosecute this action or he non=suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and nezlected rosecute this action: AL jNo. 4652 Nortn varolina, Iredell County. Mrs. Ura may Beam vs. bventley i. beam This cause coming oeiore the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Vourt that the Plaintiff wes cal.ed by lon-Suite., and it appearing smissea, re orderei, adjudged and decreed wnat this action be, andthe ana the plaintiff is taxed witn tne costs, 1 day of .ovemver, 1952, Yan 4, ioore ~ JUDGE PRESIDING ~~ In the Superior vourt, November Term, 1952 | tne Sneriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be tnat tae plaintiff failed and neglected t prosecute tuis action: it is therefore Same is the lOth day of jiove: and tne rdered, adjudged ana decreed that this action 0@, nereby uismissed, and the plaintitf is taxed with the costs. oer, 1952. Van Kh, moore JUUGE huiolvJLWG 3 vourt on for trial at tne aroresaia Term of Iredell Superior * o appear ai@ IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT SBUOND Wi Da Dulh WOVow Bot tir by lionday, wovember LOth, 1952 Yio. 3893 North Carolina, Iredell vountye Jonn Campbell VS. i; L, Shannon « R, walter duskin T/A Gaston Body Shop In tae superior vour Wovember on for trial ‘nea Judge, and it earing to by the Sheriff would be non-suited, and it appearing this action: is therefore ordered, adjudged and decr ed that this action same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costS. This the 10th day a@ November, 1952. Wo, 3894 North Carolina, Iredell County. t, F, Miller vs. vecil Kelly This cause coming on for before the undersircned Judge, e917) . Called by the sheriff to come Suited is . . } eves, aNd it appearing that P'0Secute this action: It is therefore ordered, Same is } : . 2 © 48 hereby dismissed, and , Ths aa | 448 the lOth day of Novem Dan K, +.oore _ “JUDGE PRESLUING In the Superior Court, November Term, 1952 trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior vourt nd it appearing to tne Jourt that thePlaintiff was in and prosecute this action or he would be non- plaintiff failed and neglected to appear nd and decreed that this action be, . . at Lax wita the costSe plaintiff is taxc er, 1952. Dan K, ‘wore - JUDG I atholvlnG IN THE SUPEXLOR COURT SECUNU WEoK ee= NOVLBER TERM, 1952 hionday, November lOth, 1952 INO. 3695 North Carolina In the superior Court, ’ Ired reek A unvYy Wovember Tern, 1952 ‘ial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior (up 1 it appearing to the vourt tiat the Plaintife come in and prosecute this action or he would be it ap-e > that the plaintiff failed and neclected to appear and action: erore jered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, November, 1952, Dan K. hoore JUDGE > Reo LUG No. 41,09 “orth varolina, In the Superior C>urt, Iredell Vounty,. Nov.mber Term, 1952 Roy Kk. Pearson vs. Georce Walker This cause comine on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior vourt before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the D1 a4 Plaintiff was called by the sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected appear and prosecute this action: it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the Same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 10th day of Novenber, 1952, Van K, Moore PRESILI a a a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952 \No. 4574 North Carolina, In the Superior Vourt, 0 Iredell County. November Term, 1952 W. Le a & wife, C, Lockman Hazel See vs. ¥, 1, Christopher & wife, Bessie R. Christopher ! ! I J This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of lredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, am it appearing to the vourt that the Plaintiffs were called by the vheriff to come in and prosecute this action or they would be non-suited, ana it appearing that the plaintiffs failed and neslected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, ad judged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiffs are taxed with tne costs. This the 10th day of November, 1952. No. 4711 North Carolina, Iredell vou tye pelt ed v. B, hyers & wife vs + +. Crowson & “orotny Crowson ne : : : . Son ne vou nat the vefore the undersigned Judge, amd it appearin, to the vourt t b Tea oA ’ a } ‘Hane ?) thi acu n or ‘laintiffs were called by the sheriff to come in amd prosecute this ac 10 th > ' hat the 1 if faile wn “Rey would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiffs failed and ne; lected to appear and prosecute tis action: = . : is t C ‘fudged and d od that this action be, It is vnereiore ordered, adjudged and decreca Sa; 1e de i eed re ew i with the costs. © 1s hereby dismissed, and tle plaintiffs are taxea o 1 loth day of November, 1952. 332 a ————__— ra IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPEZOR CoURT { - - oT89 r , eoTY EAT mrar* a a as ’ VVYU | ‘ SECUAWD Wook comme NOV Sibiu shits.y 1952 SECUND Wook ----- NOViu.BER TERN, 1952 wonday, November 10th, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952” We a | 4 i { Riu Nio, 1752 ai Wo. 4612 Nort Carolina In the ouperior Court bok North varolina, In the superior vourt, jredell County November Term-1952 Tredeli County lovember Term, 1952 STATE vs iia | . HI UDGUEN WILLIE LEZ PLUMMER i bata i It appearing to the Court in the above entitled cause that the defendant ° - WePAI et | (i ; a eonin : : ' is charged with a capital crime, to wit, vxe crime of murder; tuat a true bill ii This ise co on Jor trial at tie aforesaii Term of iredell Superior mths | Sourt before the undersigned Judge, und it appearing to the vourt chat the was returned by Lhe Grand Jury of Iredell County in said cause and whe sae P ’ p if Bhs : Pl iatiff was called by uhe vherif. to come in and prosecute tais action or he was set for trial av tne November Term 1952 of Superior Vourt of Iredell vounty | in giay Wie A ¢ . . i £ ¢, le i Ag ar . : . Stee ee z and that the prisoner was without funds to employ counsel: Ne Would oe -sulteu, Lv Aappearin nat vue plaintiif failed ana neglected i It is therefore ordered that :-essrs. Buren Jurney and W. R. sattley t 9 Y» at a | U I ax rosecutve t.1S 2cvion: Hh | : Attorneys at Law, be and they are hereby appointed to represent said defendant 4G iS 4 * £c Cl F) "i A, Sa san ecreec Vv .& is CeuLon UC, na tae in the trial of said case. ereby dismissed, ndthe plaintiff is taxed with tue costs diss ‘ : ” ‘ . . This §th day of November, 1952. LS a Van ih. Moore Judge Presiding Van ww, »-00re JUJGz PasoLVDING 5 EN eee a eG a E. wn i io. L879 WILLIE LEZ PLUIJER ! ORDER North varolina + ha rior “ 2 . , . : . , : orth varolina, In the superior vourt, It further appearing to the Court that the above entitled case has bevn tried ir Z 4 Oy * > . 7 2 4 - 7 . 1 } sé } ge ia vember sorm, 195¢ and that the defendant was represented at the trial by the attorneys heretotore We ve dC." isa 2 ; . ~ ° 1 ' } a> 44 ater anderson = 0 i mentioned; and it further appearing to tne Court that tne said attorneys are + G / e = vs i — entitled to a reasonable fee to be awarded by the vourt for their services herein; . je. ic jc Iq IH ©. L. Sparks & wife It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed chat Buren Jurney and W. R. ya LYparks j fii ap vattley be and they are hereby awarded the a —" . ‘ " > Irode 11 Superior 441L5 C ( y 4 - ‘ ~~ "~ =ss6 + - ws wa aad Ve a § - ad Y Jaa - *- - he ~~ & eee sum of ~200.00 as attarneys fee in the provided by law. above entitled cause to be paid by the County of Iredell as vou t before the . : . 2 ° . a» ¢hs t rt ore bare unuersi nea Judge, and it appearing to tue Court that tne * this € day of November, 1952. fleintiff was called by the wherizi to come in and ,rosecute this action or # a : Dan K, Moore would be non-suited, and it appearing tuat the plaintiff failed and neglected Judge Presiding to ap Lear ond prosecute this action: a Ke eK OM ** It is tuerefore ; ; ; and the d erelove ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, @ nd the plaintiff is taxed with the costSe wovenber, 1952, _Dan i... Moore — JUDGE + RESLJLNG a ed © 7 — — -_ , ont =e : - a z — iene peer sae eg = a Sas = 3 OTST Be ae a — en ate eee O tas < a . z He Be ncaa Teese Sate: = - : Sees ite 2, Sah I, Sete No. 1766 State vs John E, McCreary yw m4 ‘No. 1692, 169 “tate vs Edward Summers Roy Barkley Troy Forsyth This Honorable Court takes a at 9:30 o'clock 4, M IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WESK ee--- NOVi.BER TER, 1952 Monday, November 10th, 1952 DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney, J, 6. lek enters a plea of Not Guilty. *) At the end of the State's evidence, the withdraws his plea of Not Guilty of TUDGHENT of Mis of the Court is th confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Gam a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, to be asionl & work on the roads under the supervision of the “tate Highway and Public ‘orks Comission, The prison sentence is suspended for a period of Three 7“, >. t express conditions: ° hat he pay a fine of y ° — pay v100.00 and pay the 2. +hat he not operate a motor vehicle for a period of Twelve Months on the public highways ¢ the State of N, C, . 3. That he be of general sood behavior and not violate any of tre laws of the State for Three Years. Capias and comnitment to issue without further order of the Court in event the tine and costs are not paid at this term, otherwise on motion of the Solicitor at any subsequent term within three years on proof satisfactory to the Judge then pre- siding that the defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judgment. — defendant anda enters a plea & 1694 EMBEZZLEMENT J. G. Lewis is private prosecuting attorney for the State. Defendants, Edward Summers and Roy Barkley, «ite a plea of Not Juilty through their attorney, Hug G, Mitchell. Y“efendant, Troy Forsyth, enters a plea of lot Guilty, through his attorneys MeLaughlin ani Battle. Jury sworn and empanelled. 952 a recess until Tuesday Morning, lovenver Lith, + Lowe (6 poe JUDGE PRESIDING This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Horning, t jovember 11, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A. hi, Celt Li Ilo. 1699 } DRIVING DRUNK | State { Defendant through his attorney, Hugh lcAuley, oe ; { mters a plea of lot Guilty. ! 7 ’ = ¢ ~ na . ; Robert Ford -ooinson j Jury sworn ° sanelled. iNo. 1733 State vs Raymond Ralph Fox ead ‘No. 1686 State vs Flay =r Dockery Wo. 1757 State vs Arthur Gilbert Jones IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WELK ----- NOVEMBER TEIM, 1952 Tuesday, November llth, 1952 , a ee NN a tN Po =_— —— A At the close of the state's evidence, tne ny . ’ ss o a" ~ . Court cirected a verdict of hot Guilty. DRIVING DRUNK, 2ND OFFENCE. Defendant tnrough his attorneys, Mr. Trivette and J. G. Lewis, enters a plea of Nolo Vontendere. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Vommon Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. The Prison Sentence is suspended for a period of Three (3) Years on the following express conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of $250.00 and pay the cost. 2. that he not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways of N. C. for Two Years. 3. That he be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for three Years. Capias and commitment to issue without further order of the Court in event the fine and costs are not paid at this term, otherwise on motion of the Solicitor at any subsequent term within three years on proof satisfactory to tne Judge then presiding chat the defendsnt has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judgment. DRIVING DRUNK Defendant through his attorney., Mr. Trivette, erm ers a plea of Nolo vontendere. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Hirchway and Public “orks Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of Three (3) Years on the following expressed conditions: 1. that he pay a fine of $100.00 and pay the cost. 2. That he not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways of N. C. for Twelve Months. 3. That he be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for a period of Three Years. Capias and commitment to issue without further order of the “ourt in event the fine and costs are not paid at this term, otherwise on motion of the Solicitor at any subsequent term within three years on proof satisfactory to the Judge then presiding that the defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judgment. MURDER Continued for the Term, eS eee sas sate seth 336 No. 1767 State vs Elam Erastus Vishman Webieh2 No. 1723 Ytate vs Dimas ’ 7 a lin wilson Wem 4h ‘No. 1722 “tate vs Roy ).. Davidson we m-o3 sNo. 1783 otate vs Stokes S Templeton w-m- 34 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- NOViMBER TERM, 1952 Tuesday, November llth, 1952 me ee ee <.s e DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. On recommendation of the Solicitor, the Judgment of the Court is that the defendant b confined in the vtommon Jail of Iredell Count : for a period of FOUR (4) MONTHS, assigned tq work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, prison sentence is suspended for a period of three Years on the following expressed Conditions: 1. That he pay a fine of 3150.00 and the cos. 2. +that he not operate a motor vehicle on the public hishways for a period of Three Years, 3. That he be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State for Three Years. vapias and commitment to issue without further order of the Yourt in event the fine and costs are not paid at this term, otherwise on motion of the Solicitor at any subsecuent term within three years on proof satisfactory to the Judge then oresiding tnat the defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judgment, The TRANSPORT anJD POSSESS TAX PAID LIOCUOR FOR SALE Defendant through his attorney tenders the State a plea of cuilty of unlawful possession of intoxicating licuor for the purpose of sale, wnich plea tie tate accents. JUIGHLNT of whe Court is defendant confined in the Vonmon dail of Iredell vounty of SIGHT (&) MONTHS, to be assigned to work on roads under the supervision of the S Highway and Public .orks Vormission. — The prison sentence is suspended for a period a chree Following expressed conditions: vnat Le riod rears on tne 1. That he pay a fine of 5200.00 and the cos. 2. That he be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the state for a articularly that he do period of three years, not violate any of tne prohibition laws. - without furtae Vapias and commitment to issue . :. order of the Vourt in event tne fine ana oT. not raid at tuis term, otherwise on motion of Solicitor at any subsequent term wibhin three years on proof satisfactory to the Judge then presiding that the defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judgment. It is ordered that the car be discharged. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR 5 Defendant through his attorney, Je Ue enters a plea of Not Guilty. eollews Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: WB Chambers, H J Safriet, Mrs Maude G41 Leones toy Thomas, S.C Clark, J F Fespeiman, yt Cook, W L Gallimore, Roy D Thompson, hrs Usb? Bunton, R E Crawford and J G Stikeleather- Jury returned a verdict of Guilty, Lewis, MANSLAUGHTER _ Defendant through his attorneys, Battley enters a plea of Not Guilty. te Monroe Adams and J. G, Lewis are priva prosecuting attorneys for the State» | | gf, Jury sworn and empanelled as follow$: °"s ovis, itimmer, W. R. Holland, C. P. Holland, i = Mrs Ruth W. Steele, Cecil Lackey, Archie W. U, Dixon, Mrs Maude Gillespie, J Matheson -nd E E Johnson. NeLaughlin - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----=- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Tuesday, November 11, 1952 Wo. 5339 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPExtIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Clark Jean besey Plaintiff vs ORDER Edwin Monroe Clark Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and be’ne heard before the undersifned presiding over the “uperior Court of said Jounty and State on the llth day of November, 1952 and same being heard upon the pleadings and affidavits submitted to the Court and being shown to the satisfaction of the vourt that this action was started on the lst day of August, 1952 and that the defendant was duly served with summons and a copy of the Complaint on tne 4th day of August, 1952; and that no answer or demur has been filed in said cause and the vourt being of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief pled for in the Complaint: It is therefore ordered, ad Judged and decreed as vollows: 1. That the defendant pay unto the Court on Tuesday the llth day of November, 1952 the sum of 510.00 and each luesday thereafter subject to the further order of this Court, for the maintenance and support of plaintiff and their infant son, James Edwin Ulark, born April 30, 1938. 2. That the defendant pay unto the office of the Clerk of Superior Court the Attorney for the plaintiff as a reasonable attorneys sum of $75.00 to Hugh M. McAuly, fee pending the final hearing of this action and that the defendant have a period of six months from Novenbe: 11, 1952, in which to pay the sum of #75.00. 3. +hat the plaintiff have the exclusive care, custody and control of the infant son of the plaintiff and the defendant, to wit: James Edwin Clark and that the defendant, Edwin Monroe Clark shall have tne richt and privilege during reasonable times to visit with and be with the infant son, under norman conditions; both the plaintiff and the defendant are hereby prohibited from removing the said James Edwin Clark beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. 4. That the defendant have up to and including tie 21st day of November, 1952 in which to file an answer. This cause is retained for further and additional orders. This the llth day of November, 1952. Dan K, Moore “Judge Presiding “OK fj Fo ae i ee. eee ry apt hes ‘3 ae” oe 2 =. ang $e «is ee bs. 6° “2 eee oe SS a EE a = > mee ome ieee Ruth B. Vavis itiiornla Tan } lock AA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- NOV:MBER TERKM, 1952 Tuesday, November lith, 1952 IN THe SUPERIOR COURT NOVuh.bER Titi, 1952 ORDER heard and being heard before tie undersigned to the vourt that this is an action enforcement of Support Law in the Vounty of San nd docketed in this vourt on dune 18, 1952 and vounty on « 8, 1952 by rot ye f hont FF - revurmead oheriff on ‘ . } lacon nt search Joseph en received valif ornia ws sirecuit Vourt Van he JM "e “JUDGE PRESIDING - UUUG Paso Lull ? eS a recess until wednesday “orning, November 14 {C. (re JIMGH PREOLIING 339 SECOND WEEK ----= NOVEMBER TERM IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1952 Wednesday, November 12, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning ; ’ Novembe INo, 1694 State vs Troy Forsyth WaMe No, 1693 State vs Roy Barkley Wehi- iNlo, 1692 State vs “dward Summer s Cui. State 1670 vs “arvin C, Llackwelder WaMe I a r 12, 1952 at 9:30 o'clock A. M. EMBEZZLEMi NT Defendant withdraws his plea of Not Guilty and enters a plea of Nolo Contendere, i JUDGMENT of the vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of Three Years and the defendant is placed on probation in accordance with the probation judgment signed herein, and as a special condition the defendant is to pay the cost of the action at this term and shall pay into tie office of the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County the sum of $500.00 for the use and benefit of Statesville Packing Uo. EMBEZZLEMENT Defendant withdraws his plea of Not Guilty and enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. JUDGMENT of the vourt is that the defendant be confined in the Com.on Jail of Iredell County for a period of LIGHTSEN (18) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the state Highway and fublic Works Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of Three Years and the defendant is placed on probation according to the probation judgment gigned herein, and as a special condition the defendant is to pay the cost of the action at this term and shall pay into the office of the Clerk Superior Court of lredell County the sum of $500.00 for the use and benefit of Statesville Packing Co. EMBEZZLEMENT Defendant withdraws his plea of Not Guilty and enters a plea of Nolo Vontendere. JUDGMENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTH, assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the state Highway and Public Works Commission. ‘he prison sentence is suspended for three Years and the defendant is placed on probation according to the probation judgment signed herein, and as a special condition the defendant is to pay the cost of the action and pay into tne office of the Clerk Superior Court the sum of $100.00 for the use and benefit of Statesville Packing Co. e)LBEZZLEMENT The defendant tenders a plea of guilty to forcible trespass, which plea the State accepts. JUDGMENT of the Court is that tne defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a veriod of (08) EIGHTEEN MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under tne supervision of the state Hichway and Public ‘orks Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for Three Years and the : defendant placed on ee her = accordance with the ion judgment signed herein. Pronis ; Taman is enteres after it had been made to annear to the Court that the defendant has paid the sum of $3400.00 to K. . Grier & Co., and in addition has given a second deed of trust on his home for $2100.00, making a total of $5500.00 paid or to be paid by the defendant. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WE2K e--e- NOVii.bER TR , 1952 Wednesday, November 12th, 1952 No. 1783 State vs Stokes 5. Templeton Were 3h It appearing to the Court that at this term this case was tried and a mistrial was ordered due to the fact that the jury was unable to agree, and it further appearing to the vourt that the attorneys representing the private prosecution and the attorneys representing the defendant have entered into an agreement to settle all civil liability involved in the death of the deceageq Marshall C. Hellard, and the defendant having tendered a plea of Nolo Vontendere to the charze of involuntary manslaughter, which plea has been acce>ted by tle otate: Trerefore, on recomuendation of the »rivate prosecution and th Solicitor, the judement of the Vourt is, that the defenuant be confined in the common jail of Iredell Vounty for a term of 12 months, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Hichway and Public works Commission. The prison senteme is suspended for a period of three years on the following express conditions: 1. That he pay the cost of the action, 2. That he pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County the sum of 31500.00 for the use and benefit of lirs. Marshall C, Hellard, 3. that he be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State. 4. ‘that he not operate a motor venicle on the public highways of North Carolina for two years, Capias and commitment to issue without further order of the Court to put the prison sentence into effect in event the cost and $1500.00 are not paid at this term, otherwise on motion of the Solicitor at any subsequent term in three years upon proof satisfactory to the Judge then presiding that the defendant has failed in whole or in part to comply with this judgment. this the 12th day of November, 1952. No. 1722 State vs Roy M. Davidson a) Gh POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR 7 The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, assigned to work on the roads under te supervision of th State Highway and Public Works Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of fiw years on the following express conditions: * 1. That he pay a fine of $400.00 and the 0s 2. That, within ten days from this dates, remove from his premises the building locat™ thereon, northwest of his dwelling am on * lost Side of the highway, on which his residence at ed, being a building approximately 12 by _ ' two or two and a half stories high , being © this same building as described by the Sheriff _. case as having been used for gambling Poe cee)! and not reconstruct the said building in »ta Uutside Township. ot 3. That he be of general good behavior rae violate any of the laws of the State for toate of five years, particularly that he not any of tne prohibition laws. further Capias and commitment to issue without 8 order of the Court in event the fine and seion are not paid at this term, otha wise “aa of the Solicitor at any subsequent term grrr three years on proof satisfactory to Oe aad in then presiding that the defendant has fa ‘ whole or in part to comply with this judgme A A A a a RE AY RN IN THE SUPE::IOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Wednesday, November 12th, 1952 MANSLAUGHTER AND DRIVING AFTER LICExSE SUSPENDED Defendant enters a plea o: Guilty to Vriving After “icense Suspended, _ Uefendant enters a plea of Not Guilty to Manslaughter, through his attorney, Yrant Bolmer,. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: %. Gordon wallace, H. B, “oore, J. OU. Pharr, w. B, Chambers, Roy Thomas, S. UL. vlark, J. F. fesperman, Jack ‘. Cook, W. L. Gallimore, Roy WU, Thompson, iirs. Kuby Bunton and 4, «, Crawford. Jury returned a verdict of Guilty as charged. Nos. 1791 & 1798 State vs ; Blbanks White of Yudgment. JUUGuNT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the vommon Jail of Iredell vounty for a period of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, to be assisned to work on the roads under the supervision of the “tate highway and Public works Com .ission. iNo. 5084 NORTH CAROLINA N THs IOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY J. M. Schafer Plaintiff Vs. John A, Miller and wife, Slaine ©, “iller Defendants eo This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before “is Honor, “an be hoore, Judge Presiding at tne “November term of the superior vourt of iredell that all matters vounty and it appearing to the vourt from the statemmt ot counsel ti ¢ : . . ae 7" on } . he o controversy set out in tne pleadings have been agreed upo. Db) “ae defendant has agreed to pay to the plainvifi ~ accept the sua of Une Hundred Dollars and the cos and t Satisfaction thereof; | at. ‘ . . . dan wor ‘ed nd decreed vat “Ow, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, ad. udger, 14 ainti } , Racin he sum One Hundred voisars Plaintiff have nd recover of the defendant the, sum of Un ' t ‘ ; ri “% " he costs of this action to be taxed by tue Jlerk. “MiSs 12th day of November, 1952. Dan A, “oore “Judge -residi ng vonsent: THLE Chanblee eys for the )laintit? J r: G. Lewis cs “ney for the Verendant 4+hese two cases are consolidated for the purpose al A aca E NR emt once a ae ag mE agg tn i 92 RSS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Wednesday, November 12th, 1952 No. 5390 NORTH CAnkOLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY WILLIS RHODES, JR., MINOR WILLIS RHODES, SR., PLALNT vs JUDGMENT ve TED GOUDWIN, ).1NOR J. A. PEARSON, AND SANDERS BROS. CO,, INC. DEFENDANTS TEIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before His Honor, Dan K, Moore, Judge Presidine over the November, 1952, Regular Civil Term of the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard, the plaintiff being represented by his attorney, Grant Bolmer, and the defendants J. A Pearson and Sanders Bros, Wer Co., Inc., beins represented by their Attarney, R. A, Hedrick, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendants have agreed upon the compronise iat and settlement of all matters and things in dispute or controversy between then, » matters and things set forth in the Complaint in this action, for f money hereinafter set forth; and it further appearing to the Vourt, urt finding as facts from an investigation of the circumstances, that the minor plaintiff willis “hodes, Jr., is a minor of the age of approximately twenty (20) years; that he appears in this action by his father and next friend, Willis Rhodes, Sr.; that the minor plaintiff and his next friend are desirous of making a settlesent upon the terms hereinafter set forth; and that the defendants have offered to pay, and the plaintiff's desire to accept, the sum of Bleven Hundred and Seventy-Five ($1175) Dollars, in full, complete and final compromise Settlement, satisfaction and discharge of any and all claims and demands whats e inti ver of the plaintiff and the minot plaintiff against the defendants, including the claims, demands and cause of action set forth in the Complaint herein; tM the liability, if any of the defendan s, is questionable; that it is for the bes interest of the minor plaintiff and his next friend herein to accept the sun of E r leven Hundred Seventy-'ive (31175) Dollars in full, complete and final compro” settleme tis ‘ i ent, Satisfaction and discharge of any and all claims in demand of oe claims, laintiff « he mi i plaintiff and the minor plaintiff against the defendants, including the that said sum , ff to dem: is emands and cause of accion set forth in the Complaint herein; an adequate, fair and just amount for the plaintiff and the minor plainti satisfaction and aint ff receive uple j ve in full, complete and final compromise settlement, dischars i : ischarge of all claims, and de:ands of the plaintiff and the minot, pl IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----= NOViiBER TaRM, 1952 Wednesday, November 12th, 1952 against the defendants, including the claims, demands and cause oi action set forth in the Complaint herein; and the vourts sanctioning and approving said settlement: It Is, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED aND VECREED ti.at the plaintiffs have and recover of the defendants the sum of Hlwen Hundred Seventy-five ($1175) Dollars and the cost of this action; and that the claimant have said sum of noney and the cost of this action into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Jourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, or to the next friend, Willis “hodes, Ore, of the minor plaintiff, Willis Rhodes, Jr. for the use and benefit of the said minor plaintiff, Willis Rhodes, Jr. for the use and benefit of the said minor plaintiff, Willis Rhodes, Jr., such payment to constitute ana operate as a full, complete and compromise settlenent, satisfaction, release and discharge of any and all claims and demands whatsoever which the plaintiff and the minor plai nviff have or they have against the defendants, including the claims, demands, and causes of action set forth in the Complaint in this action. The attorney for the Plaintiff is allowed a fee of $135.00 to be paid out of tne sum paid by the defendant in settlement of the above. This 10 day of November, 1952. Dan K. Moore “Sudge Presiding WE CONSENT: Grant Bolmer i, A, Hedrick “illis Rhodes, SR. RECKLESS DRIVING ilo, 1758 Continued State vs W ‘ ebster Yolonel Lunsford Mio, 1759 “tate vs *“ebster Colonel Lunsford SPEEDING Continued 'N0.1760 State SPEEDING vs Cont inued Cink o IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WiuK ---- NOVAMBER TERM, 1952 SECOND WEEK ---- NOVSiBER VERM, 1952 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12th, 1952 Thursday, ‘“ovember 13th, 1952 Wo. 1764 DRIVING DRUNK This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Yhursday Morning, NOs svt Va f State Continued we aoa atcinae Ao vs lovenber 13th, 1952 at 9:30 O'CLOCK Ae sic Richard Glenn Bowers Nos. 1769 & 1770 DRIVING DRUNK AND sr AIL TO STOP FOR SIREN ‘No, 1710 otate Continued ba woRTH CAROLINA vs NOs TH LARULIN: Arthur Bailey IREDELL COUNTY 1 ee - a stat Wo. 177h Permitting Mft of Liquor on His Property "— State Jontinued : UOT u Vn ald Wade Yov ana vs Dona ; it ete Sa en Cease 352327145 L. L. (Bill) Lackey 1940 ore Soupe 18-52327h5, 705 UO 34 i.NUPACTURE LIQUOR This cause coming one to be heard Cont nued of the Suverior vourt, i beings near and the Defendant 1 aving been found guilty of tra rting intoxicating licuor in laws of the State of North Carolina, said licuor being trans} orted in escribed automobile, and no person having appeared claiming any lie interest in the said automobile. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that confiscated and sold at public auction to the highest bidder for cash after due advertisement as provided by law, and that the proceeds oi tne sale, after deducting automobile, be turned Sy cost of storace and sale and any other costs arainst said \ T ’ = » he 1 Pram : t} - S: . over to the Treasurer of Iredell County to be used for the school fund o1 tne said County, This the 13 day of November, 1952. Dan K. Moore ~SJudge Presiaing ‘No, 4867 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY (Before the Clerk) vt . over bi, Blankenship Plaintiff — CONSENT JUDGMENT is. Jettie c, Ritchie This Honorable ¢ ourt takes a recess until Thursday Morning, November 13th, Defendant O69 « . ' A 1952 at 9:30 o clock A ppearing that all matters and MM. This cause coming on to be heard, and it a cas fo Ae ‘tings in Controversey have been settled between the plaintiff and defendant, UDGE PRESIDING pp emudedis ‘nd plaintire? n Court and asking that th S attorney appearing i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR CounT SECOND WEEK ---- NOVEMBER TERN 1952 SECOND WEEK ----- NOVEMBER TERM. Jo , 5 » 1952 Thursday, November 13th, 1952 hursday, November Bth, 19$2 it is, therefore, No. 5065 ORD!XED, that said cause be, and it is hereby non-suited, North Carolina In the Superior Court Dan K, Moore I 1 Count Novexber Term 1952 ons redell Vounty m 195 “JUDGE PRESTJING--------—— Fred W. Hudson, ; is I consent: Plainti?f, VS. ORDER FOR COMPLNSATION OF Tressie Pierce Fletcher WILLIAM R. POPE, ATVORNEY Attorney for Plaintiff. Moor Food Store, Inc., I consent: Defendant. Woodhouse & Ward by WI Ward, Jr Attorney for Defendant, P This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Jan Kk. Moore, Judge of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the court that William R. Pope was appointed attorney for the receivership in the above entitled cause at the 1951 August Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County and since that time has been fulfilling the duties of attorney for the said receivership; that although the receivership was appointed in tne 1951 May term of the Iredell County superior Court, that there was no attorney to advise tne receiver until the said William Rk, Pope was appointed; that it was necessary for the said attorney to investigate the transactions of the said receivership up unti] the time of his appointment, and since that time it has been necessary for said attorney to file reports, tax returns, and engage in a great amount of correspondence and to advise the receiver ' ite: ee in all matters pertaining to the receivership; and that $250.00 is a fair and reason- able amount for compensation to said attorney for services rendered to tue receiver sinc aia tea 3 up until this date, IT Is THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUUGED, AND DECREED that R. M. Linker, receiver, be and he is hereby authorized and direction to pay William R. Pope, attorney, the Sum of $250.00 for Compensation for services rendered. this the 13th day of Nov., 1952. Dan K, Moore Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR VOURT SECOND WEEK ~.-... NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Thursday, November 13th, 1952 ‘No. 5065 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County November, 1952, Tere Vivil Court Fred W. Hudson j VS. ! RECSIVER'S REPORT Moor Food Store, Inc, ! R. M. Linker, receiver, Moor Food Store, Inc., respectfully shows the Court that the followine is a true and accurate account of the transactions of the receivership froz, “oveuber 13, 1951, to Nov. 12, 1952. Salance in Bank, Novenber 13, 1951 ¥2509.78 Receipts none Total 22509.78 ——— 1951 Visbursements Nov, 17, wm 9. Neel, Atty. for W, 5. Ward and Vo. by order of court % 632.51 Nov. 17 Tax collector Iredell County 1951 and 1952 county taxes 96.94, Nov. 29 Town of wooresville, 1950 and 1951 “Own and School taxes 156.86 Yec, 20 N.C, Intangible Tax 1.32 harch 12 Collector ofiInternal tevenue Withholding tax 296.59 May 27 Collector of Internal Revenue Balance Withholding tax 1, «96 July 21, Local Insurance “Gency, receiver's bond 30.00 Total Disbursements 1202.18 Salance in Bank 1307.60 m Total $2509.78 —— Claims recej 14 ived from general Creditors $6859.36 This 13 day of November, 1952 Re M, Linker | nmeceiver North Varolina Iredell County . Swo . ' rn to and Subscribed before me this 13 day of November, 1952 J. C, Sherrill, Jr. _-— Notary Public My Columission “xpires 3124/51, Confirmed and an, “ 8pproved tiis 13 day of Nov.,, 1952, Dan K, Moore Judge Presiding ee = aaa ene eer _,2N THE SUPERIOR COURT ————_—______ SECONY WEEK eee. NOVilSER tuk, 1952 Thursday, November 13th, 1952 No. 5128 North Carolina In the Superior Co rt, Iredell County Novenber tern, 1952, ¢, F, Moose, Administrator of the f Estate of Ralph u, ».00Se, a eceased, Plaintiff, { ‘a ORDER Southern sailway Company, Yefendant, | t . This cause coming on to be neard before the unders ned Judge of the Superior Court of Iredell vounty at the November 1952 Tern upon written lotion filed by the defendant to strike certain portions as set out in the totion, from the Amended Complaint filed by the plaintiff in this cause, and the Vourt having considered the matter and heard the argument of counsel, has concluded as Loilows: ™ +° [ ‘ and * } , r . ay. ; ’ t’ Ac . 4natv toe ..otion Of tne cdeiendant anagd eacn ana ever art tiuereot as set ? ’ out in the ..otion to strike, should be aitowed, bACePT that portion set out in ‘aPagraph sour, which is as follows: "that the distance between the said railroad tracks of the defendant and the said U. S. Highway No. 21 at said road crossins is so short that a full-length, standard make automobile or tr ck, such as the truck driver by the plaintiff's intestate, cannot Stop between said tracks and said h ghway “0 Stop, look and listen ior the approach of a train without naving a part of such truck or vehicle pro jected over the said highway or over the Space through which a train must travel on said railroad tracks." and that portion set out in Paragraph Ten, which is as follows: "and dragged his head over tne cross-ties over said track" Insofar as these two portions of said paragraphs are concerned, the Meas “Otion is denied, The lefendant is given thirty days to file Answer to the Amended Yonplaint, Dan K, “oore _ iii Judge Presiding To the ruling of the Court as set out in the foregoing Order, the defendant excepts and to the Signing of thd Judgment, the defendant excepts and Si¥es notice of appeal in open Court. Further notice is waived by counsel for Plaintire, The defendant is given thirty days to prepare and serve case on “Peal ang the plaintiff is given thirty days thereafter to serve counter-case t exceptions, “ppeal bond in the amount of $100.00 is adjudged sufficient. Dan K, Moore “Presiding Yudge eae kK mK Km | | pee Pre agis a e et go ee et serene 2 s ae es : niigeo== IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - NOVi.BER TERM, 1952 Thursday, November 13th, 1952 No. 3893 North Carolina. In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November 1952 Term, John Campbell " JUDGMENT M, L. Shannon and R. Walter Huskin, T/A Gaston Body vhop This cause being calendared for trial at this the ‘ovenber 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior Vourt before the undersigned Judge, and the plaintiff having been called at the Bar of the Court to come in and prosecute his action against the defendant or he would be non-suited and failing to appear and prosecute said action it was ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and he was non-wuited. However, it later appearing to the Court that this cause was continued for the Term prior to the aforesaid judgment of non-wuit being entered, It is therefore, hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of non-suit previously entered in this cause at this Term of Court be and tle sae is hereby set aside, and that the cause is hereby placed upon the trial docket of this Court for trial. This the 13th day of November, 1952. Dan K, Moore Judge Presiding \No. 3894 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. B. F. Miller | NOVEMBER 1952 TEXM. = JUDGMENT Cecil Kelly } This cause being calendared for trial at this the November 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and the Plaintiff havi ng been called at the Bar of the Court to come in and prosecute his action ' e against the defendant or he would be non-suited and failing to appear and prosecut sai ‘ aid action it was ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and he was non-wuited, However, it later appearing to the Court that this cause wae continued f or the Term prior to the aforesaid judgment of nonsuit being enterely a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ------ NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Thursday, November 13th, 1952 It is therefore, hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the ‘udgnent of non-wuit previously entered in this cause at this Term of Court be jud gin f nd the same is hereby placed upon the trial docket of this Court for trial. a This the 13th day of November, 1952. Van kK. “oore Judge Presiding. lg391S NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR VOURT, IREDELL COUNTY. NOViiBER 1952 TER. J. S. Miller vs. ! Cecil Kelly { 5 + . -* +hie } I ayn) . QOnS fT - This cause being calendared for trial at this the November 1952 term of Iredell County superior Court before the undersicned Judge, and the plaintiff alled at the Bar of the Court to come in and prosecute fis action having been c against the defendant or he would be non-suited and failing to appear and , 3 . } ¢ reed t t the pnp aintif be prosecute said action it was ordered, adjudged and decreed tnat vane Laintass : ; annear-n th 301 that this cause was and he was non-suited. However, it later appearing, to whe Court that entered, ° . } - * wy - + ej " continued for the Teri: prior to the aforesaid Jud nt of non-suit bein 7 . . ; ‘ sed that the judcnent It is therefore, hereby ordered, adjudmed anu decreed tha : i i in tnis cau jourt be and the sam non-suit previously entered in this cause at ourt b dt the trial docket } ° .e , ¢ herehv hereby set aside, and that the cause is hereb! this Court for trial. This the 13th day of ‘ovember, 1952. Dan 4, “oore ' Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Thursday, November 13th, 1952 15072 NORTH CaROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELi. COUNTY M. De Tilley vs. DECREE Josie Jordon et al This cause coming on to be heard at the November 1952 term of court on motion of plaintiff to be allowed to amend his complaint by inserting in the complaint the actual description of the road which is the subject of this action. The Yourt in its descretion, permits the motion of plaintiff. Defendants are given 30 days to file any reply they may be advised. Dan K,. Moore Presiding Judge YWNo. 5216 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPENIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. N. C. James, Plaintiff, vs. ORDER OF REMOVAL. Q. T. Surrett, J. B. James, and Carl Green, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the November Tera, 1952, of the Suwrior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Judge Dan kK. Moore, upon motion of defendants, J. B. James and C. S. Green, for removal of Said action to Haywood vounty, North Carolina, for trial, and it appearing to the our’ g : » for good cause having been shown, and the Court so finds as a fact that Said action should be moved to Haywood County, North Carolina, for trial: NOW, THEREFOR’, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the above entitled action be removed from Iredell County to Haywood County, North Carolin for trial, and that all papers, records and dccuments on file with the Glerk of t } 0 he Superior Court of Iredell vounty, constituting the court record in this cas? be forwarded by said Clerk to the Clerk of the wood County: ouperior Court of Hay This the 13th day of November, 1952, Dan K, Moore Dan K,. Moore Judge Presiding. o Me IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Thursday, November 13th , 1952 iiloe 5334 NORTH CAROLINA. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: J. F. Rinmer, T. A. Harris, archie Bost, W. v. UVixon, E. E, Johnson, S. Gordon Wallace, A. L. -vS- Lowrance, H. B. Moore, S. v. Clark, &. &. Crawford, J. G, Stikeleather and H. J. Sarriet. no W. Proctor, eno plaintift Charles E. Heath, Defendant In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff: Answer: $130.65. NORTH CAROLINA. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. Zeno W. Proctor, Plaintiff ‘i JUDGMENT Charles E, Heath, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and beard before His Honor, Yan K. Moore, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November term o. the Superior Court of lredell n : ; ws: vounty, and the jury having answered the issue submitted to them as follo In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: $130.75. Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff i he: -vu from have and recover of the defendant the sum of $130.75 with interest the i the 13 day of November, 1952, together with the costs of this action to be ‘axed by the clerk; and, it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that if this ; i e judgment has not been satisfied after the expiration of thirty days from the cat , o e thereof, that a certified copy or transcript of the same be sent to the Commissioner , _ C te *f Motor Vehicles of North Carolina as provided by Norta Carolina General Statu ates Section 20-198 entitled, "Suspension of drivers license and registration certific f or failure to pay tort judgement." This 13 day of November, 1952. Dan K. Moore ; Judge Presiding. cee ee #8 wea 7 ua rem " i —eciguih-- spanen ny Sagigigag <2 28 2a Gh en aad = a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER TERI, 1952 Thursday, November 13th, 1952 /SP=3625 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Iredell County. November Term 1952 North Varolina Rural Electrification Authority, on behalf of the Davie Electric l.embership Corporation, Petitioner, Vs. JUDG).uNT Louis#s, White and husband, xobert A, White, 4lizabeth o. Deaton and husband, Fred H. Deaton, Karl soherrill and wife, Suma Yherrill, Gladys os. Jones and husband, Jd. Wesley Jones, Vetendants. se coming on to be being heard by His Honor Dan K, i.oore, Judge assicned and holding courts in the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, upon the exceptions filed by the Attorneys for the petitioner; waived its richt to trial by jury, and it udze could hear the facts and determine tne controversy; that af resentation of the evidence by both the i upon arruement of counsel for both parties, the the damaze suffered by the defendants by reason of the erection, operation and maintenance of its transmission line by the petitioner is in the amount of Six thousand Jollars (¥#6,000.00). IT IS, THEREVORE, OXVEXED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the damage assessed by the Comissioners heretofore appointed be, and the same is hereby set aside; that the defendants have and recover of the petitioner the sum of Six Thousand Dollars (36,000.00), in full and complete damages to the defendants’ property ” reason of the erection, operation and maintenance of the petitioner's transmissio 1 ss t! . : ine across the property of the defendants; that the petitioner be taxed with the cost, bin . i ads dk ntered at Statesville, North Carolina, on Novenber 13, 1952. Dan K, Moore Dan K. Moore Jaage Tasted Holding the Courts in om Judicial District of Nort Carolina. /No. 1724 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- NOVi.BER TERM, 1952 Thursday, November 13th, 1952 SCI FA Noe 1558 Judgment of the Court is that the Sci Fa on State ; Bondsman be made absolute to be discharged upon payment of the cost o the Sci Fa. $ Lottie Bell Cloud Principal Frances S,. Brantley Surety No, 1591 SCI FA State Judgment of the Court is that the oci Fa on vs bondsman be made absoluteto be discharged upon Arthur D. Talbert payment of the cost of the sci Fa. Principal ¢, L, Johnson curety SCI FA State Sci Fa on bondsman continued until Jamuary Term, vs 1953. L, D, Wall Principal Caper Strickland Surety No, 1604 & 1606 SCI FA State Sci Fa on bondsman continued until January Tem, vs 1953. Joseph Fulton woods Principal All State Bonding Co. Surety 5274 UVaniel Lazenby vs Roxie Shives Lazenby Cont inued. 5320 John Henry Jones vs Mabel Jones -------------mm nnn nnn --- Continued. 5371 Charles Plummer vs Thelma W Plummer Continued. 5377. Katherine Sloop vs wm E Sloop - vontinued. 5378 Clarence L. Little vs Irene Morrison Little Continued. 5019 WC Campbell vs Charles Lynn Binkley 4849 Jennie S Queen vs WR Battley et al 4956 RN Sloan vs Monroe Adams, et al 5020 Vance McBride vs William M Herrin $023 Ellis I Bailey T/A The Hudson Bailey Paint Co vs Wm Fox T/A The Mack FoxPaint Co -----------------"" - Continued. 9081 Lucinda Bellamy vs Alfonzo Stevenson Vontinued. 9098 Troy P Cloaninger et al vs Foy P Brittain et al -- Cont inued. 9157 AP Steadman vs D W Scott et al qqnoomsenn nnn n nnn men ennn en” Continued. 5164 Glenn Gilleland vs Mitchell G Meseimore et al -----~= ------- Continued. 5169 CH Weber vs Atlantic Co Inc T/A The Iredell Ice “ Fuel Co - Continued. ed. 5190 John D Beaver vs Clester Roy Beaver - Continu d. 5191 Shaver Motor Uo Inc et al vs City of Statesville ---- Continue ioe acta amen sl pH abil thd IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COU! a ASA SECOND WEEK ----- NOVEMBER TER)., 1952 SECOND WEEK ----- NOVED BER ean, 1952 i Thursday, November 13th, 1952 on wae 4 ’ ’ Thursday, November 13th, 1952 - 3 SCI FA /SP-3625 fio. 159 ; Judgment of the Court is that the Sci Fa on er ace a Bondsman be made absolute to be discharged upon NORTH CAROLINA, n e Superior Vourt tottie Bell Cloud payment of the cost of the Sci Fa. 4 incipal : Iredell County. November Term 1952 spanees Se Brantley Surety North Varolina Rural Hlectrification Authority, on behalf of the Davie Electric |.embership Corporation, io. 1591 SCI FA State Judgment of the Court is that the Sci Fa on vs bondsman be made absoluteto be discharged upon Arthur D. Talbert payment of the cost of the Sci Fa. Vs. JUDGLLNT Principal ¢, L, Johnson Louis#s. White and husband, xobert Surety A, “White, Llizabeth 5. Veaton and husband, “red 4, Jeaton Karl Sherrill No, 172k Scr FA and wife, su herr jladys 9. State Sci Fa on bondsman continued until Jamuary Term, 1953. Jones and husband, Jd S, og Ee : Petitioner, onde oneness EE SS vs L, D, Wall Principal Caper Strickland Surety ene age cer Ret Es a a AT et he ‘d, and being heard by dis Honor Dan K, in the Fifteenth Judicial District of No, 1604 & 1606 SCI FA _ . ce State Sei Fa on bondsman continued until January Tem, che “ttorneys lor tne petitioner; vs 1953. ; sis Joseph Fulton woods richt to trial by jury, and it Principal All State Bonding Co. could hear the facts and determine Surety ‘ both the 5274 Uaniel Lazenby vs Roxie Shives Lazenby -----99--------~ ----- Continued. of counsel for both parties, ts . : ; ’ -- Continued. 5320 John Henry Jones vs Mabel Jones ------------nnn rrr rn nnn” - ‘ed by the ndants by reason of the erection, > vonti 5371 Charles Plummer vs Thelma W Pluumn Continued. Ss transmissior . ‘a netition <a : the | , ) ismission line by the petitioner is in ee 5377 Katherine Sloop vs wm E Sloop ---- of Six thousand Jollars (#6.000.0¢ = =. ~~ Ae ? J a : ’ 000). aaceesnece= Continued. : 5378 Clarence L. Little vs Irene Morrison Little ----- 7 is, Litbare ‘ iE ORDERED D 1 TT os BART It d hhh Wha Ned hh ded a dl UGED AND DECREED tl t the dama e assessé M : , ; . 5019 WC Campbell vs Charles Lynn Binkley - by the Com issioners heret i - y ssioners heretofore appointed be, and the same is hereby set aside; 4849 Jennie S Quee WR Battley et al | n 2 een vs that the defenda nts have and recover t} ,+4 } f Si nd 2 and or of the petitioner the sum of »1x Thousa \ 4956 RN Sloan vs Monroe Adams, et al ---=-- Dollars ($ ( i rs (36,000.00), in full and complete damages to the defendants’ property by io. 5020 Vance McBride vs William ff Herrin ------------------ reason of the erection, operati i ansmissic® peration and maintenarz r ti setiti 's transmis » ; ; 1 ; ’ aintenance of the petitioner 5023 Ellis 1 Bailey T/# The Hudson Bailey Paint Co vs Wm D Fox j ss ) _— . : 7 . ‘ amcacencoeese= eaenaee & nued. line across the broperty OL tne defendants; that the petitioner be taxed with T/A the Mack FoxPaint YO «e<2e--*"°""°---"“-" ontd the cost, 5081 Lucinda Bellamy vs Alfonzo Stevenson -- ---- Vontinued. 5098 Troy P Cloaninger et al vs Foy P Brittain et al --- --Cont inued. “ntered sy4 N ae at Statesville, North Varolina, on November 13, 1952. : 9157 A P Steadman vs D W Scott et al -------- Continued. Dan K. Moore : e , Hold: ; Tore, Tada, T Re “0. 5164 Glenn Gilleland vs Mitchell G Meseimore et gl] -------------- Continued. olding e daiicial Distraee sae 5169 CH Weber vs Atlantic Co Inc T/A The Iredel C ina. : arolina 5190 Jol Penne eopente eemre wounne-= Continued. ohn D Beaver vs Clester Roy Beaver ---~ 1 Ice « Fuel Co - Continued. 5191 Shaver Motor Co Inc et al vs City of Statesville -------"""" Continued. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Thursday, November 13, 1952 No. 5029 Worth Carolina | In the cuperior Vourt, i dno. 5192 P » Hedrick vs Helen Adams ---------------------- Continued, Iredell County | *OLONE VAG VIGIK. i “No. 5201 Parks Andrews ‘icLean et al vs Town of Mooresville-Continued, Mack R. Walker, | I} i 1h ise Hi | INo. 5207 A L Sims vs Dave 5S Brown eneenen-nennnnnnnnn------ Continued, Plaintiff, } H Hevea hii 5 : : Pie yaaa | i : No. SP 3617 Mary Sharpe Morrison et al vs Fannie Sharpe ys. { JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT ai TAPE ik (tha, 8 Hinshaw et al ----------------0- n-ne enn -------- Continued, bh ean Haan a Annie Mae Johnson a ean { i INo. 5260 Mrs Pearl Shook weatherman vs Statesville Motor - : i) a Coach Co Thevorporate ------<--------------------- Continued, Defendant. { i ait i el, { Wii} ‘No. 5314 W W Goodrum vs Vera Loretta Goodrum -------------- Continued, an Dn This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Pai I Wo. 5326 Thomas H White vs Herbert D Wooten et al --------- Continued, al Hy. : (, G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, Tae dit eet No. 5347 Moody white vs La. Miss. Pipe Line Const Co ------ Continued, bi i t yh de and it appearing to the court from the statement of the attorneys for the : i i} No. 4503 LG Nash vs H M Morrison; et al ------------------ Continued, Hie plaintiff and the attorneys for the defendant, who filed a counterclaim in the di No. 5236 Minnie Lee Martin vs Tate Linney ----------------- Continued. We above entitled cause against tue plaintiff, tnat the matters and tnuings in i \No. 5340 E O Shoemaker vs Mack R Walker et al ------------- Continued. : ; ; a e : ; controversy regarding both the plaintiff's claim and the defendant's counterclaim \No. 5349 Blackwelder Furniture Co et al vs G E Cook et al = Continued, have been settled by the parties, and that the plaintiff has elected to take - anonesuit in his action, and t..at tne defendant as elected to take a non-suit Pe in her counterclain; + oa It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be non-suited as to his original cause of action, and that tue defendan hon-Suited as to her counterclaim, and tnat tue plaintiil be cnargea with oh costs to be taxed by the Clerk. ee . ——— perior vourt CONSENTED TO: aod, Sowers & Avery Tite ~-* ward, Jr, vorneys ina Plaintire Raymer ; haymer ttorneys for Defendant NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF JUDGhiz NT UPON RETURN TO EDWARD R. PRICE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS This matter coming on to be heard before His Honor, Dan K. Moore, Judge Presiding over the Superior Court of Iredell County, November Tern, 1982, at the courthouse in Statesville, North Carolina, upon a Writ of Habeas Corpus concerning the legality of the imprisonment or restraint of Edward R, Price, and a Return to said Writ filed by Guy 4. Elmore, Superintendent, State Prison vamp No. 903, Newton, vatawba County, North Carolina; And the said sdward i. Price being personally present and not represente by counsel; And tue said Guy KR, elmore being personally present and represented by counsel; And the vourt having examined the Petition, the Return, and all of the records thereto attached, and having heard all of the evidence presented, finds the following facts: that the said Edward Kk, Price was apprehended, tried, convicted and sentenced in the following case, to wit: By the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, November, Term, 1951, in which he was sentenced to a term of four (1) years in the county jail, and assigned to work upon the public roads, in case No. 17-567, for Storebreaking & Larceny", under which sentence Com- mitment was issued by the Clerk of said Court on the 16th day of November, 1951; And the Court being of the opinion that the said Edward R. Price is restrained of his liberty by virtue of a legal and final judgmamt of a court of competent Jurisdiction, that the time during which he may be legally detained has not expired, and that he is not entitled to the relief sought by him in this proceeding; IT Is NOW, tHEREPFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the Petitioner's Application be and the same is hereby denied; Ze —_ tne said Edward Rh. Price be and he is lereby remaded to the custody in which he was restrained when the said Writ was issued. This the 5 day of November, 1952. Dan K, Moore JUDGE PRESIDING Iyo, 5119 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY piedmont Bank and Trust Company Steve Talbert, W. R. Hobbs, Jd. lL. VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Young, and Thomas Westmoreland ! os i MOTION FOR JUDGLiNT OF { 1 Now comes William R. Pope, one of the Attorneys for the Plaintiff in the above entitled cause, and will respectfully show to the vourt that the matters and things set out in the complaint of the above entitled cause have been fully settled, and that no counter claims have been filed arainst the Plaintiff. It is therefore requested that a judgement of voluntary nonsuit be entered in the above entitled cause. This the 10th day of November, 1952. William Kk. Pope Attorney ror Plaintiff NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY Piedmont Bank and Trust Company vs JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY Steve Talbert, W. R. Hobbs, J. Le. | NONSUIT Young, and Thomas westmoreiand This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on motion of William R. Pope, one of the attorneys for the Plaintiff, and it appearing to the Court that the matters and things set out in the complaint in the above entitled cause have been fully settled, and that no counter claim has been filed against the Plaintiff. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that a judgement of Voluntary nonsuit be and is hereby entered in the above entitled cause. This the 13 day of November, 1952. C. G, Smith ' Clerk of superior Vourt (No. 5369 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Industrial 3ank, Inc., Plaintiff, VSe D, S. Brown ' Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina; And it appearing to the Vourt that Summons and a copy of the Complaint were duly served on the defendant on October 3, 1952; that the defendant has not filed answer or Demurrer or otherwise pled; that the time for filing Answer has expired, and that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final; And it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff did not get possession of the personal property described in the Complaint, and that the defendant retained and now has the said personal property for which this action was instituted; And it further appearing to the Vourt that since the institution of this action the defendant has paid, on October 7, 1952, the sum of $248.00 to be applied to the judgment, but that the said defendant has failed to pay the balance of the said judgment; And the Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment in the amount prayed for in the Complaint, subject to a credit of $248.00 as of October 7, 1952; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $249.98 with interest from August 2, 1952, until paid, and for the costs of this action, subject to a credit of $248.00 as of O 5 ctober 7, 1952, leav.ng a balance due on this judgment of $4.73 plus the costs of this action, This the 14 day of November, 1952. C, G, Smith - a Clerk of Superior vourt No. 5289 yoRTH CAROLINA ia ois iii nue IREDELL COUNTY gay Mackie, Trading as Mackie Lumber Company _* Plaintiff, VS. R, A. Bowlin, ! | I JUDGMENT | 1 Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, v. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for sudgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 24th day of May, 1952; And it further appearing to the Court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on tne 26th day of Nay, 1952; And it further appearing to the Vourt that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to tie Court from the verified complaint that the cause ofaction consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $1,271.20 with interest thereon from the 30th day of September, 1951; But it appearing to the vourt from the statement of attorney for the plaintiff that the plantiff has received the sum of $334.80 upon said contract, having been paid that amount by the owner of the property upon which the building materials were used which were sold to the defendant by the plaintiff pursuant to said contract, and that said moneys were paid by the owner out of the Temaining funds; NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $936.40, with interest ‘hereon from the 30th day of vept, 1951, and the costs of this action. This 18th day of November, 1952 C, G, Smith Ulerk of the Superior Vourt No. 5416 N.C. Iredell Vounty Ann C, Johnson vs NON-SUIT Charles T. Uurrent By agreement of the parties hereto and adjustment and settlement having been made between them and the defendant having turned the automobile over to plaintiff. The action is dismissed at cost of plaintiff. Nov. 21, 1952. C. G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Vourt Agreed to Ann . Johnson sharles Current NWo. 5304 NORTH VCARDLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Theatre Time Vlock Co., Inc., Plaintiff, vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY Klutz-Schafer urniture Co *» -S Defendant, — This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, upon motion by the attorneys for the plaintiff; and it appearing © the vourt that the matters in controversy in the above suit have been settled and that the plaintiff has elected to take a voluntary non-suit in this cause; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is hereby non-suited in the above entitled cause. This the 21 day of November, 1952. C. G, Smith ~ ee Clerk of ouperior Vourt Consented to: LAND, SOWERS & AVERY We. I. Ward, Jr, Attorneys for plaintift Ho. 5281 NORTH UAROLINA, In the Supe rior Vourt IREDELL COUNTY. B efore the Clerk Mill Factors Corporation, Plaintiff, a JUUGUNT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Julie's, Incorporated, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before tue undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the vourt from the statement ol and winberry, Attorneys for have been a the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action settled aud compromised, and that tne plaintiff desires totake a voluntary nonsuit: . —y ' ,IOMT \ ‘Tt RPONRYW ant. 4 . IT IS, tHEwsYOn, CONSIWERED, OnE, aAVIUUGED and DECREED, Upon motion ol Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for theplaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs otf this action be taxed a, ainst tue plaintiff by the Ulerk of vourt. This the 24th day of November, 1952. C. G. Smith Clerk of superior court o: Iredell County, North carolina. CONSENTED TO: Adams, Vearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, BY: _ Monroe Adams NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court NORTH UAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY IREDELL COUNTY Before the Clerk T. H. Thompson, T/A Thompson vervice venter N, Scott mae Plaintiff, Plaintiff Bene os eee peer eo eee ; “ JUDGMENT Ray Littje 7 re, Defendant. Ania Acai hacia eo on to be heard before the Honorable Varl G, Smith. ¢ This cause coming on to be heard. and it appearing to the Court that the + smith, Clerk : ’ PI & of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for action is brought on a note, the amount due being a certain and fixed aount, the defendant was personally served sue defendant by default final; and it further appearing to the court tiuat che court that a verified complaint was filed and with a summons, together with a copy ol the complaint, and failed and neglected day of October, 1952; to file an answer to said complaint within the time allowed by law, and it further said sunmons together with a appearing to the court that the plaintiff is entitled to recover judgment against served < the defendar I 3 day of o 4 A. coca c+} ‘ on the defendant on the 3lst day of Uctober, the defendant for the sum oi 400.00, with interest thereon fron the 15th day of November, 1950, until paid, at tue rate ol six per cent per annum, together with that no answe dcmurrer the . : whee . v answer, er, or ovher the costs oi this action: no extension of time to file It is therefore ordered and adjudged by tue court that ne plaintiff recover witha uth 4 . i4n mau filed a . ~ . . . > ry \ » } 4 wth in sre Trnyneree within wnhica pleadin S may be tiled judgment against the defendant for the sum ol p00 .00, together witil interest tnere the 15th day of Novenber, 1950, until on at the rate of six per cent per annum fro! de i uae to the court from the verified complaint that tie paid, and the costs af this action to be taxed against the defendant by this court. a breach of an express contract to pay a Sul of This the 5th day oi UVecember, 1952. ed suey i ixed OY e Yor tract ar ‘ i s +a . +hoered. (7 : mith : : ue contract, namely, the sum of »343.90 dol.iars with interest term GO, G. wml ; Vs ‘ . a ’ P3439 Liars “WTerk OL superior Court, Tredelll rom the l&th day of Decenber , 1951; County, North Carolina. Now, theref ie te an » “ueretore, 1t is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the “endant +} ) he defendant the sum of $343.90 dollars, with interest thereon from the 18th day of m the 18th day of Deceuber 5]. oe : Jecei.ber, 1951, and the costs of this action. Thi lay of is 3rd day of Dece; ber, 1952. Ve (, Smith a ee Clerk of the ouperior Vourt a ae te ee — j i tau fet Hl ; i it is ey met ij ee ' i fi } yi | i} ' a <p Seen se ai en NO. 5192 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT IREDELL COUNTY P. S. Hedrick Plaintiff vs. Helen Adams Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, vlerk of Superior Court or Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff anda the defendant that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and the defendant having paid to the plaintiff the sum of )100.00, and the plaintiff naving accepted same im full settlement of this controversy, and that tne plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; It is, Lnerefore, ordered, adjudsed, and decreed tiuat tne plaintiff be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the VUlerk. This 4th day of December, 1952. omith of Vourt GC. Ga Clerk Vonsented to: Joe P, wWhitener Attaney for the Plaintiff Finch & Vhamblee Attorneys ior tue Defendant By Fred G. Unamblee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952,-=FIRST WEEK Monday, December 8th, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THs SUPERIOR CUURT, sgeDELL COUNTY. DECEMBER TERM, 1952. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and neld in ana for the . 4 . } St} Vv , > .« . tn County and ovate aforesaid on the oth day of Deceiuber, 1952, at 10:00 o'clock 4. M., when and where His lionor, W. K. McLean, Judge, is present and presiding ‘ ’ by appointment, as per the following vommission: "OrkFICsn Or WHE CHILF JUSTICe Or TE SUPRoLE of the sTatt OF NORTH CAROLINA VOURT We ste DEVIN CHIEF JUSTICE 10 THE HONORABLE W. K. McLEAN One of the Special Judges oi the Superior Vourts of North Varolina. GRu&kTING: WHEREAS, It has been made to appear to tue satisfaction oilthe undersigned that the public interest requires that you hold the special two week term of tne superior - . . : 1 oaks . . - » Os ‘ar Court for the County of Iredell, beginning tie eighth aay of Vecember, 1952, tor the trial of civil cases. NOW, THERES ORE, Yo We Ae DEVIN, Chief Justice of the eupreme vourt ol the , : . . C auth avtew sted in me by law, do hereby State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby intereat so requires and thereiore I do hereby commission you find that the public to hold said term of said Vourt for the vounty aforesaid, to begin on lhonday, the ichth a or ; ; & Aes yo week ntil the business is eighth day of December, 1952, and continue two weeks, oyuntil the business disposed of. TN Tr i . meu arr a 6 : ; r S ; f IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name a- Chief dvustice 0 the Supreme Court of North Carolina, on this tairteenth da, of November 1952. W. A. Vevin Chief Justice oi the oupreme Court of North Varolina Attest: John ie Otrong Administrative Assistant" and J, C, Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and opened vourt by der ot the Court. J.C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Vourt i ; s for ‘ne names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as juror the December Special Term, 1952, Iredell Couaty Superior Court, to-wit: es | | | ee = ae - ES a i" Sian ditendalelmeaeeeememeeeneen linens tcneeealineenemeeanimeenmeenneatlimimeneeneepeemeeneneenen eeennaneeenee ee a a at ni pond EE ad IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --=- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Monday, December 8th, 1952 R. i, Hicks w. I. Sharpe Mirs. J. M. Holland watts Mrs. J. MM. Alexander W. B. Lundy BE. B. E, Elmer Todebush F, &. Krider frank Lverhardt urs. Hessie M. Nicholson J. G. Bagnal, dr KH. H, Baker, dr toy &, lhoore Harold E. Vashion w,. medman S. D. Boyd Ralph N. Blackwelder “, #loyd Walker i. f, Howard Y¥, Ried horrison i, iw, asSon lake Holmes Woodrow Pope Banks Brown Mrs. Alma w. hivett vaailie Jenkins L. H. Sherrill N. B. Blackwelder J. Owen Lyles fax hayes Pope were excused by Voctor's certiiicate. Jr. were excused by tne vourt. . or tie MANE, lason were not returned. Je Owen Lyles were not janks Brown were excused until the laren tem, 1953, nall termed as nereilnaitver Oe olson, Qo *, ©. &, Krider,d. G. Bagnal, Jr., xoy &. Moore, Ralph N. Blackwelder. ‘No. 5360 Willodene Beam Hubbard JVIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being empanelled answers tue issues submit as follows: duly sworn and ted to it IN This wUi pirLonr CuUaT WILLOULNS vs VAANLLO We AUBLARD Le er > nlaines fe -_" were tie plaintiff anu the defendant intermarried as alleged in ow vomplaint? answer Yes + “— wal le aintiff nere , ‘i ion? plaintiff a person of Indian descent to the third generatio” 4nswer Yes eriod of at nas v..e + an? this actiom plaintif : : least si f been a resident ot North Carolina for a P xX months immedi , : ; iS immediately preceding the commencement ot answer Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRS? WEEK --- DECEMBER SPECIAL YEidi, 1952 Monday, December 8th, 1952 IN ‘HE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA Dis bul bint THAD 1952 IREDELL COUNTY WILLODEN& BBA. HUBBARD “s JUUG. NT CHARLES Vie HUBBARD This cause coming on to be heard ana er Term, 195; nty beio nor, i. MeLean, Jui ge Superior Vourt of lredell vo all the issues as iollows: and a jury the Jury having answer 1. Were the Plaintiff and the defendant intermarried as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes Is the plaintiff a person of Indian descent to the third seneration? Answer: Yes Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for a period of at least six months immediately preceding tue ncement oi vhis action: en Ube Answer: Yes And it appearing to the Court that the purported marriage between the plaintiff end the defendant is one of those marriages prohibited by General Statutes 51-3 and that the said purported marriage was void. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said purported marriage be, and t! ne is hereby declared to be null and void and of no effect. This the 8th day of December, 1952. Ww. K, McLean Judge Pres ding No. 5376 DIVORCE The Divorce vury empanelled answers the is as follows: Karee Hoover Lai} ; vs Kenneth C. Lail #1" being duly sworn and sues submitted to it In the Superior Court NORTH CAROLIN AROLINA, Special Term December 1952 IREDELL COUNTY. s Karee Hoover Lail, Plaintiff, Vs. ! I j ISSUES Kenneth C, Lail, I Defendant. and the defendant, Kenneth C, Lail, 1. Did the plaintiff, Karee Hoover Lail, ‘Mtermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL Ti.:M, 1952 honday, December 8th, 1952 2. Have the plaintiff, Karee noover Lail, and the defendant, Aenneth 6, Lail, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes 3 Has the plaintiff, Karee “oover tail, been a bona fide resident of the ) ae State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding tie cormencement of this action? ANSWER __ Yes var +> CAROLINA In the Superior vourt Special Term December 1952 IREDELL COUNTY. Karee “oover Lail, PLAINTIFF, VS. Kenneth co, Lail, m DEF EMDAMT. } This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor W. k. McLean, Presiding, and a jury, at the special December Term 1952, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues having been submitted answered by the jury, to-wit: ; 1. Wid the plaintiff, Karee “oover Lail, and che defendant, senneth C, bail, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER — Yes 2. Have tue plaintiff, Saree lloover Lail, and the defendant, Kenneth C. Lail, lived separate ani apart from each other for two consecutive yeard i: ediately rior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes 3. Has the plaintiff, Karee lioover Lail, been a bona fide resident of the te North © ine ee : . . nt of etate of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commenceme tais action? ANSWER — Yes The Court further finds that sum.ons was duly served on the defendant by publicatio. 11 County, in the "Statesville Jaily", a newspaper published in Irede Worth Carolina, and that - the last publication of said summons was on the in day of Uctober, 1952, and that the summons was duly served, and the defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Monday December 8th, 1952 Court as of the 26th day of October, 1952. IT 1S, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDiRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, ‘hat the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are dissolved, and that the plaintiff, saree Hoover Lail, is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Kenneth C. Lail. Let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff. This the 6th day of December, 1952. licLean Presiding \No. 5364 North Carolina In the Superior Vourt Iredell County N. M. Benfield Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: E, Elmer Todebush, irs. Hessie Nicholson, Plaimiff S. D. Boyc, Flake Holmes, Mrs. Aima “ivett, Max Hayes, W. F. Sharpe, rs. J. li. Alexander, vs. F, E. Krider, J. G. Bagnal, Jr., Roy 4%. “oore, and Kalph N. Blackwelder. E, Cansler Issue Defendant In what amount, if any, is the defendant endebted to the plaintiff? Answer? $131.00 North Carolina In the uperior Court Tredell County i, li, Benfield Plaintiff vs Judgment R. E. Cansler | Defendant ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, W. kh. e December Special Term of the Superior “clean, Judce Presiding and a jury at th Court of Iredell County and the following issue having been submitted to and answered by the jury; i ? In what amount, if any, is the defendant endebted to the Plaintiff? Answer: One Hundred Thirty One and no/100 dollars ($131.00) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Monday, December 8th, 1952 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred Thirty One and No/100 dollars (3131.00) with interest thereon from the €th da, of Decenber, 1952: ang tae costs in this action to be taxed by the vlerk; and it is further ordered, adzudred and decreed that if this judgment has not been satisfied after the expiration ofsixty days from the date hereof, that a certified copy or transcript of this judpment be sent to the Commissioner of “otor Vehicles of Nort:: Carolina as provided by General Statutes of North Carolina, Chapter 20, Article 9 entitled, "hotor Vehi and Financial Responsibility «ct". This ay of Decei.ber, 1952. a. KK, iucLean dudge Presiding \iio. 5382 wURLH Gan0bina, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL Davie slectric Membership : a Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: vorporation, a Corporation, E. Elmer Todebush, Mrs. ‘iessie Nicholson, o. D. Boyd, Flake Holmes, Mrs. Alma Kivett, Max Hayes, W. F. Scarpe, Mrs. J. M. Alexander, F, E. Krider, J. G. Bagnal, Jr., Roy &. Moore, and Ralph N\. Blackwelder. Plaintiff, Ve VSe - ¥. eduiond, *loyd Redmond, ) wv and Dexter Redmond, ee em ee ee Vefendants. 1. Did the defendant, D. D. Redmond, grant and convey unto the plaintiff a written richt of way and easement permitting the plaintiff to construct, repair, operate, and maintain a transmission line across the ninety-four acre tract of property owned by the defendant, D. D. Red ond, which instrument is recorded in Deed Book 235, page 529, Iredell County Registry, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes ee ee Ui i 4 eae i the defendants attempt to obstruct and interfere with the plaintiff's right acquired by it : i , oy its written ri ht of way agreement with the defendant, D, De Rediiond, in the i i , © construction, operation and maintenance of its electri lin th e across the property of the defendant, D. D. Redmond, as alleged in the OP plaint? Answer: Yes c transmis)” IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Monday, December Sth, 1952 NORTH CAROLINA, N THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. Davie Llectric Membership Corporation, a Corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. ), D, Redmond, Floyd Redmond, and Dexter Redmond, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before “is Honor, W. a licLean, Judce Presiding, and a Jury, at the December Term 1952 of tue Superior Court of Iredell County; and the Jury having answered tue issues submitted to them as follows: "], Did the defendant, D. D. edmond, grant nvey unto the plaintiff a written right oi way and easement permitting tne plaintiff to construct, repair, é he ninety-four acre tract of operate, and maintain a transmission line across property owned by defendant, D. D. Reduond, which instrument is recorded in recorded in Deed Book 235, page 529, iredell County it stry, ea ae vonplain us Answer (Yes) . uet and interfere with the plaintiff's UD. 2. Did the defendants attempt to obstr right acouired by its written right of way agreci.ent with the defenuant, sednond, in the construction, operation ane maintenance of its electric transmission line across the property of the defendant, J. U. Xedond, as alleged in tne vomplaint : A swer Yes JRELD, that the defenaants and i Nw Uv Tm NOY t wt yt 1 } ; ) vy LHR SD URLs, az 490 Una 4st) y Ald UUW, Rac} a ; : ‘ and as ’ “eh Of then, and they are hereby permanently restra ned and enjoined from interfering with the construction of tie laintiff's transmission line which ° San ) traverses vane ninety=four (94) acre tract of land owned by tue iefendant, Ue. Ve ied o + . : ’ 4 LY nd ond; and that the defendants, and each enjol 1ead a of them, be permanently 7” , : ") - > rae , “strained word, act or threat of piystal violence, or +n an) other manner, “rom interfering with, obstructing, or in any manner, preventing tne enjoyment of . ig 1. 4 } a . : 7 - ar 5 he rights and priviledges of the plaintiff which were acquired and granted in Redmond, dated th , ’ ‘t certain right of way agreement executed by the defendant, D. D. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST Whoh e= DECMADER SPBCLAL TERM, 1952 FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Monday, Vecember Sth, 1952 Moniay, December Sth, 1952 July 1952 and recorded in Book 235, page 529, Iredell Count ie rae , . July 7, 199 - " = 2?) oy eer, ell County ite istry, 4th. That the plaintiff nave the exclusive care, custody and control of S tered at Statesville, Iredell Vounty, «orth varolina or >t e t) aintiff anc i @ ; 7. n varolina on December 8, 1952, of the plaintiff and the defendant to wit, James Ldwin Clark, the infant son we. K. McLean i ¢ —_—*— - = h defendant pay the cost of this acti Juage Assigned and nolding courts of 5th. that tne de pay 2 UNLS ction. Fifteenth Judicial District varolina. <r This cause is retained for further and additional order. Tis the 8 day of December, 1952. Wy a li.cLean Judge Presiding eine et re RIOR COURT Mio. 5339 7 Y ’ T m IN THE SUPERIOR COURT “ xe ee =. SS eae NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY DECE).BEX SPECIAL Tih, Ma nompy TP Al 1TAQI MRS. bLidil Jills y dos ali Si cee ee ee JUDGMENT -V- EDWIN MONROE CLARK oe ues — a = BRS 4 et es El. ee epee ete ce meee and noldin ns Ee TT SO rte ndersirned presiding over the . 5 ‘ , = ek ali ‘ : _— It appearing to the undersigned Judge presiding over State on the 8th day of Vecenber, 1952, and eis a. C . ay pone a2, Special Term of Court of Iredeil vounty commencing on Dece ie * Z was i:paneled, the defendant, through . ps é pane , — defendant heretofore filed an answer on 1:OVe: acres allowed to witi:draw all of that par : ; ae ° woe Paragraph 3-A thereof, alleged certain acts ol ad ltery a se | : ; e plaintiff, tnis ndant d res — © ’ earing to the vourt tnat mant aes.l sar pene RE as ez od ar _—s » Khoa n urt; s a * ° ° ‘ne — - + rt reporter by -he Cours, Said alle ations, and so signifies his on . a tf eaanrn »d to the P ~ srr 1 . he issues to be submitte to prove the allegations txerein a! upon motion of tne 1 4 be Sul LCx 3 1 court found the following fz lered p A an Li i L LOWS ordered that Paragraph 3-4 in Line iefendant failed to comply with the order of the court entirety. ber, 1952. of ouverior Court — : «nd. inat the defendant selendant pay into the office of the Clerk December 13, + Said county ate tha «@ sa y ia stave the sum of 312.50 on or before Saturday, 1952 and e: ; : ‘ 6 ach Saturday thereafter, subject to the further orders of this court, for the maintenance < 2 ] en e ind a. Le a a 2 ‘ ‘ Edwin ‘ : 2 . Support of plaintiff and their infant son, James Daniel Lazenby vs Roxie Shives Laz nby Continued Aad Ha Gawes wo s46Vae as Clark, born Apri . 1 ‘ g ’ pril 30, 1948, lo. a a Continua John Henry Jones vs Mabel Jones rior Court Continued 3yd. That the defendan Katherine D. “loop vs William Le sloop = ay into the office of the Clerk of Supe the sum of $100.00 for Huch onable MeAuly, Attorney of the plaintiff, as a reas attorneys fee for the hearj . : " ) tne hearing of this action, and tat the defendant commence payments at the rate of 82.99 t ~ #2000 a week beginning December 13, 1952 and each vaturday thereafter until the entire }100.00 has been paid Le Ae rere ee eee, pear et a ms aa pte ee ee ome ae 2 ieetat = % ee a er oF 2 ees Te 2 eT TEE mee eT SS eee re Se ean tage IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST JEER -- DECL..BER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Monday, December 8th, 1952 ea: 5019 We C. Campbell vs vharles Lynn Binkley -------- Continued by Consent Bio. 5020 Vance eBride vs William l Herrin Continued by Conse INo. 5023 Hllis T 3ailey T/A The Hudson Bailey Paint Co. vs. wm D tox T/A the lack Fox Paint Co. ---- Continued by ¢ Le B. Skeen vs James W. Atwell & James Jr Continued by Ode tt MUNCL LL, Wo. 4849 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: i. Slmer Todebush, s. VD. Boyd, Flake Holnes, liax Hayes, W. F. Sharpe, «. &. Krider, J. G Bagnal, Jr., oy &. :.oore, Ralph NY, Blackwelder, N. F. woward, Charlie Jenkins, ilarold E, Cashion. Jennie ikeS a recess until Tuesday Morning, This Honorable C ber 9, rt takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Decet 1952, at 9:30 o'clock he Die IN THe SUPLRIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Tuesday, December 9th, 1952 This Honorable Court convenes accordiny to adjournment on Tuesday lhorning, December 9th, 1952, Ato. 4849 IN TH SUPsiIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY December Special Term, 1952 JENNIE S. QUEEN alge A R. BATTLLY, 4 ONROE ADAMS , ADDR. of He ie SLOAN, Dec. Did the Plaintiff and the Ueclenc express or implied, as alleged in ,he Complaint? ANSWER _ Yes 2. If so, did the ‘laintiff render services to Vel Y pursuant to the said contract? 2 se ANSWER 2 3000.00 North Carolina Iredell] ¢ anty queen, Plaintiff vs. Mos Battley and Monroe Mdas, Administrators of the “state of Lelville Gaston Sloan, Defendants my a 5 -o b tard at the Decenber Term, 1952, The above entitled cause coming on to be heard at the Ke I Jur idin Kk. McLean, Judge presiding “Uperior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor ™- = Jury, and it being tried upon the following issues: l, or express Did the plaintiff and the defendants' intestate enter into a contract exp implied, as alleged in the complaint? ursuant . If so, did the plaintiff render services to defendants! intestate, P ° the said contract? What was the reasonable value of the said services? cement ett a TE es a AE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT — rremmetet — FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 : ae SRG die Sen Tuesday, December 9th, 1952’ FIRST "et Gace oe 1952 7? ,’ And the jury having answered the first issue "Yes", and the second issue "Yeon es", This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on wednesday i.orning, and the third issue "33,000.00": 7 necenber 10th, 1952, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the aintif : : ore at the plaintiff, Jennie g, Queen, have and recover of the defendants, Ww. R. Battley and Monroe Adans —- to. 4956 R. N, Sloan Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: this action to be taxed by the Clerk of thi N. B. Blackwelder, Mrs. J. M. Holland, | - Frank Everhardt, Wi. Floyd Walker, I.rs. Hessie 1°52. Nicholson, Mrs. J. M. Alexander, Fred Holt, vonroe Adams, W. R. Battley E, slmer Todebush, 5. D. Boyd, flake Holmes, Admr of M. G. Sloan, dec F, E. Krider and J. G. Banal, dr. X Pending trial of this case, the vourt takes a recess until Thursday horning. Adiii nistrators of ne BSt AUS ot Mel Vi lle Gaston Sloan, she sult of P , 900 00 3 * ’ Q2S5lGC « to the ~upreme Court. -vurtuher notice == a entnatatiat tet Ae E E T A Ae Hip ae Hi I} = en This Hon i i orable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, Decenber 1°) 1952, at 9:30 o'clock A. li This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, December llth, 9 1952, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT =: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TEI 4, 1952 FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Thursday, December 11, 1952 Thursday, December 11, 1952 This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Thur sday Horning jlo 5072 ’ . December llth, 1952, at 9:30 o'clock A. li. yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERLOX COURT IREDELL COUNT Y hic. 5072 M.D. Tilley M. D. Tilley Jury sworn and empanelled as follovys: ; N. B. Blackwelder, Mrs. J. kh. Holland, ” JUDGE NT vs Frank iverhardt, W. Floyd Walker, Mrs, Hess: ' ‘ dan, Gates Jordan Nicholson, Mrs. J... Alexander ’ Fred Holt, - oe ee aan Godfrey Thurman’ Mrs. Josie Jordan E. tlmer Todebush, S. D. Boyd, L. Re Sherrill aah D. ft. Jordan, Lorna Jore F, E, Krider and J. G. Bagnal, Jr. : jan Barker, Mabel Jordan, John eas tae ; Godfrey, Lorene W. Jordan and At the close of the evidence, defendant moves for judgment as of Non-Suit, 0.7 vy. Barker Motion allowed. eae xe mn This cause coming on to be heard at the December 1952 Special Term \No. 5157 of Iredell County Superior Court, and being heard before his Honor W. K. |.cLean, stead Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Judge Presiding and a Jury and at the close of the plaintiffs evidence tne Mrs. J. M. Holland, Frank Everhardt, W. Floyd Walker, Mrs. Hessie Nicholson, Mrs. Jd. M, Alexander, Fred Holt, “. Elmer Todebush, 3. D. Boyd, L. H. Sherrill, F. E. Krider, J. G. Bagnal, Jr. and Mrs. Alva Kivett. defendants took a voluntary nonsuit as to their cross action and counterclaim and at the close of all the evidence, the Vourt of its own motion nonsuited the action on the grounds that the evidence was not sufficient to establish the contentions NORTH CaxOLINa, IN THE SUPERIOR VCUURT. of the plaintiff and ordered that the temporary restraining order heretofore IREDELL vCOUNTY. issued in this cause be dissolved, and ordered that the costs of this action be A. P. Steadman, taxed by the Clerk against the plaintiffs and the sureties on their bond; Plaintiff, And subsequently to the action set out avove, the parties to this cause, Vs. UDGMENT with their counsel appeared before the Vourt and announced that they had compromised | T T ; ° . l < 5 » Be ". "so 4. 5, Lyerly, and settled all matters and things including the counter-claim in controversy and L. V. Vorrins & ‘ ’ . wo = oo . between them and that the plaintiffs, for themselves, their heirs and assicne desire Vefendants, and to hereby relinquish and quitclaim any claim or right to an easement or right- This cause ¢c ; " 1 : . J , ! cause coming on to be heard ts | we Ke McLean, Judge . ‘ se her . before His Honor, * , of-way across the lands of the defendants as described in the complaint or otherwise; djudged, and decreed ‘reSiding, ar ; It is therefore by consent, ordered, considered, ad ida Jury, at the Vecember Term 1952 ot the Superior Court of Ir Le J u Ne } ’ . ‘ edell ounty, North varolina; and the plajntiff having introduced his that and the same i8 the road in controversy, as described in the pleadings, be, evidence and rested hi ca w al Ss is mse hereupon the defendants moved for a Judgmen , Pp endants m Nereby declared to be abandoned and closed; in case of nonsuit, an the land in nd the Co eine of 8 ougat — he Court being of the opinion that such motion e It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by consent that to be allowed, . the controversy including the road thereon be, and the same is hereby declared to be th IT IS THE MORE ORDERE . at e and : h ‘ 0 +HEREVORE ORVERED, A JJUUGEU, AND DECKEED, that the plaintiff b Property of the defendants free and discharged of any claim on the part of the he is hereby n 4 PP ; + and + Monguaved, and that this case be, and it is hereby dismissed; Plaintiffs, their heirs, or assigns. that slerk lat the defendants recover of’ the plaintiff the cost ot this action to be It is further ordered that the costs ot this action be taxed by the vle taxed by the Uo La . ~ “eainst the plaintiffs and the sureties on their bond. Migned in a : on ; E and entered in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, This llth day of December, 1952. Decemb ecember 12, 1952, W. K, McLean— ~Sadge Presiding W. K, McLean Judge Presiding ow me me me oe me x IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECHMBER Ol uClaL Tham, 1952 fhursday, December ll, 1952, By consent of: M.D. Tilley MN. U. tilley Laura V. Tilley lrs. vbaura V. lilley Kk, A, Collier Atvcorney for Plaintiffs burke a“ so 1 urte vur ke Jefendant \ ornevs BULODTNS Yo Laug ulin Cc attley attorneys for Vefendan Josie vordan vosie Jordan 2c alSe ~——— Mrs This | is Honorable Vourt takes a recess unti] Friday morning, 1952, at 9:30 o'clock A, } IN THE SUPEXLOR COUKT FIRST WEEK -- Detemben SPECIAL Tuiin, 1952 Friday, December 12, 1952 Tis Honorable Vourt convenes according to adj necenber 12, 1952, ab 9:30 o'clock A. mM. se 2A A forth Carolina © a9 Tarn Yy Iredell vOurlyy mristine MeCrary Jatt av sr NOW. 4 se ee soming on to be heard, by agreement, before His Hunor, W. 3° urnment on Iriday l.orning, Ke NcLean, Judge holding a Special Term ol Iredell Superior vourt, and it a» earing to the Court that the action is brought for the the parties determined under the Declaratory Judgment act and that all ol the nave been agreed upon and the vourt is asked to interpret t according to a contract between the plaintiff and tne defenuan., the material portion being copied in Paragraph Six of the Acreed ctatement of Facts; The Court having considered the facts, the wording of the contract, that the defendant is entitled to manage the property during the absence of t plaintiff and her children from Statesville and that out ofthe rents col during said period, he is deduct tne major re} taxes and insurance, as provided in the contract, balance to the ¢ r re vtatement ol It is, thereiore, ordered, adjudged and decreed on tne submitted, that the norized to manage the propert ’ defendant be, and he is au irom Saiqa eousect the rents therefrom and to pay vaxeS and insurance and pay the balance to tne plaintiff. The plaintiff is taxed with the costs of this action. Dec. 12, 1952. a) asl ae W. Ke. MCLean Judge Presiding To the conclusions offlaw and the signing of the foregoing Judgment, Plaintiff in apt time and in open court, excepts and appeals to tne a appeal bond set at GLU ‘orth CVarolina. Further notice is waived, al) : s ~ Owed thirty days to file case on appeal. Defendant fifteen day this action agree that t fil * Counter-case or exceptions. ‘The parties to a : Ppeal shall consist of "Agreement of Counsel, Statement ol Agreed December 1 and this Judgment, Ww. K. McLean Judge Presiding % % the rights of the pa purpose oi having the rights of tacts rties concludes tre lected airs and upkeep, plaintiff racts and rents the major repairs, upkeep, supreme vourt uO. Plaintiff s thereafter to he case on Case, Exhibit 1 7 a mn Ce eS ee > set aba a oe . aX 5 ; Satan in ae nce ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TEXM, 1952 Friday, December 12th, 1952 /4No. 5201 NORTH CaROLINA IN THE SUPEXIOR COURT IREDELL VOUNTY DECEMBER SPECIAL TEM, 1952 Parks Andrews McLean, Sarah McLean kumple, Christine McLean Patterson, Alma tcLean Sherrill, William Bert McLean and a Lois McLean Carson, and J. G, Basnal, dr. Plaintiffs Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: E. él todebush, irs. J. ih, “nolland, Frank Evevtera” W. Floyd Walker, irs. Hessie Nicholson Mrs.’ J. lig Alexander, “urs. Alva Kivett, Charlie Jenkins, Max Hayes, L. H. enerrill, F, ’ E. Krider -V- flown ot looresville, Northvarolina, Defendants defendant co... itted a continuing trespass by going upon tue lands of tis and taking a right of way 25 feet wide and 325 feet long, for the purpose its storm sewer line, as admitted in the answer? NSWER Yes ue acts ol t e defendants in operating its storm sewer line over the lanis a@intviils constituted a nuisance, as alleged in the Complaint? ANSwik Yes w.at permanent damageg are the plaintiffs entitled to recover? ANSWER pilOc 0.00 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cOUdT IREDELL COUNTY Parks andrews McLean, varah icLean Rumple, Christine cLean Sherrill William Bert McLean, Lois licLean varson, and lirs, ulma McLean Vs JUDGMENT Town of ooresville, North Carolina This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor, MeLean, Jude sidine : , , : Cout of in, Yudge Presiding and a Jury, at the December Term of the Superior Uout 0 ‘ ~% . ws: Iredell County, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as folle of ae te defendant committed a continuing trespass by going up™ nes 2 the plaintiffs and taking a right of way 25 feet wide an long, for t} igi . 2 ws wie purpose oi installing i ling, as the Answer? ling its storm sewer By the 325 feet admitted im Answer: "Yes," 2. Has the acts the lands of the Complaint? over Or the defendants in operating its storm sewer lit plaintiffs constituted a nuisance, as alleged in Answer: "Yes", IN THE SUPERLOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TLah, 1952 Friday, December 12th, 1952 3. What permanent damages are the plaintiffs entitled to recover? Answer: 1000.00". Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Plaintiffs nave and recover of the Vefendant the sum of 1,000.00, with together with the costs 4 of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that tie defendant is tne owner o of an easement for sewer purposes over and across the lands of the plaintiffs as iescribed in the Amendment to the answer. This 12 day oi December, 1952. We. K. licLean Judge Presiding a Upon the coming in of the verdict the defendant moves vo set the same side and for a new trial. Motion denied and defendant excepts to signing ol the ‘udgment the defendant & plffs. objects, excepts and in open Court gives notice of appeal to the Supreme Vourt. further notice waived. The defendant is allowed 45 days in which to serve case on appeal and . »s _—_ one 4 y c ,er=-Ccas offs. are allowed 30 days thereafter which to file exception or serve counter Se. This 12 day of Dec. 1952. dio, 5411 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT eli NORTH VAMULLIVA IREDELL COUN'TY DECK.BER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 dobert V. Brantley, lext Friend oi “ou Ann Brantley ius JUDGHLNT irs, L, G, Caldwell iis y \ ‘ Ny Jud e This cause coming on to be heard before 418 Honor W. Kk. McLean, Eg Molding the C > \ : ine that the plaintiff, Lou Ann olding the Jourts of Iredell County, and it appearing that p , ° - de > lg , mrSe *rantley was injured by the negligent act of the minor son of the defendant, TY . r ne { 4. G : . an ; r poearing tnat tne 4+ Caldwell, as set out in the Vomplaint, and it furtner ap} ig . } ~ eo thé th ai tiff plaintife through her Next Friend, Robert V. Brantley, has agreed that tne per is entitled to recover ot the defendant the sum of $400.00, and upon finding by the C . aintiff, Mi Lou Curt that the said amount is reasonable and right for the plaintiff, Manor, Ann Brantley; a aia pe ee P Se $5 semana ee 2s eos rr a aaa ae iS IN THE SUPE:LOR CUURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL Teall, 1952 Friday, December leth, 1952 It is therefore ordered and decreed that the said Robert V, Brantley ’ hs a ) ’ \ nD * ’ ° , “ 95 iH Next Friend oi Lou Ann Brantley, recover oi the said Mrs. L. G. Valdwell. g fe » Ge endant, the sum or 3400.00, together with tne costs of the action. It is further ordered tnat all attorney fees for the plaintiff be paigq ti) — . hi by the defendant, together with the costs of the action. i “. K. McLean | JUDGs PRESIDING | No. 5191 eas <a : ; eecleeaa-- cae : — ; NORTH CarOLINA IN THE SUPiAxLOR COURT , . my Lito VGUUNLL vhaver »otor U0., Inc., Tnomas &: Howard Uo., Inc., Quality Southern Oil Lo., Inc, Holland Transfer Co., We. R, Holland, Statesville «abricating & Welding Co. Frank’ L. walker, D. W. loose, Rev. Paul Reese, Mrs. sarl Kuykendall, David Mos¢ ‘Mrs. vavid Moss, Louisa v, Littleton, 4. P. Johnson, Vora Jo.nson, it. &. rox, ve Carl oore, J. 5. denegar, Hoyle slier, &. . vrooks, Jr., C. E. Tate, Virginia F. Tate helvin Troutman, 4. 4. brawley, A. lh. wutledge, rs. A. N. sutledge, A. G, Guthrie, } mrs. anne Ww. Guturie, sdward 3. Hodges, liiriam P. Hodges, Robert J. omita, Svelyn | G, smith, silly Kt, brown, i. P, Wilhelm, iva .. Wilhelm, Mrs. Lizzie Brown, J. M. farwon, Hazel o. Harmon, He hi. Lackey, vordon Poston, Mrs. John Varson, Jdr., H. V. butz, Varl l.. Pope, is. Lilliam sox, ¥. fT. Allison, irs. C. T. Allison, omith Jourlass Vo., Inc., henry i. Poston, G. H. imitchell, brs. UV. U. Vowan, Mrs. C.H. nt, tobert Y, Gill, J. O. Gowan, dJr., Joe Sumers, Sam 6, Gaither, +. J. Angell, a ee 3 k saad : vr., harl carger, otatesville County Club Plaintiffs | Vs. Tne City ot Statesville Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and bein; heard before and by his Honor, we K. hicLean, Judge Presiding at the Vecember 1952 Snecial Term of the 2 uperior vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, all parties being represented by counsel rese 5 +n A T7 Ssyrer he ; a ; } .* , present, and a trial by jury having been waived by consent of counsel of record for the parties to tre action. t+! = : : . mon -" ce action, the Court proceeded to hear both oral and written testimony offered by the parties in evidence and argument oi counsel, and at the conslusion thereof the Vou does make 1 n° : : . sd j : t of > vourt does make tne following findings of fact based upon sala evidence 7) Le The the City y Oe, ' : rT ° : at the Vity of State:ville is a municipal corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Noith Carolina. n are taxpayers erty 2. That the parti er ne ? . ue parties designated as plaintiffs in this actio and landowners in the Ui { Statesvill h C ? 1 tne vity of Statesville, North Carolina, and owners of real prop 5 ne tO } : 1S} } . abutting the Statesvil.e-Salisbury hi hway from the intersection of East Front Stree to the eastern city limits of the City of Statesville 7 1 e i e . . , , 3. That the aforesaid portion of the Salisbury Road is one of the nee the City of Statesville * of U, 8 i esi y Ss “©, @ part or U. S, Highway No. 70, and a part of Om ‘ system of the State of North Carolina; that it is maintained by the North carolina I+ whw - , Piskil 4 a ' ‘ State Highway and Public “orks Vo: mission; and for te purpose of such maintenance is within the territorial bounds of District No. 2. Division 9, of the highway IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Friday, December 12th, 1952 onstruction, and enyineering syste. of the horth Carolina State gaintenance, © ubli ‘ks Commission dighway and Public works : 4. That prior to July, 1951, the above referred portion of highway in the nity of Statesville consisted of a paved road approximately 18 fect wide with art shoulders on either side of the paved surface approximately 6 to 8 feet in width. i That at a called meeting of the Board of Aldermen of the Vity of States- 5. yille on June 12, 1951, a resolution was passed approviny a project for laying curb ond guttering and other improvements on the valisbury oad in the vity from sast ae front Street to the vity Limits, contingent upon the cost of the sane bein, paid for out of the funds designated and earmarked for use in the City ot Statesville as provided for by Chapter 217 of the Public Laws of 1941, Sections l through 4, as amended; and tuat av the same meeting the said Loard or Aldermen declared the Salisbury Xoad from Hast *ront Street to the City Limits an improvement zone, curb and gutter to be constructed on eac. side of tne strect the entire length. 6, That the North Carolina vtate Highway and Public Works Commission approved the project for curb and gutters as outlined by the vity of Statesville and agreed that the City of Statesville should go ahead and obtain bids for the curb and | Ht gutter construction, subject to tne approval of the vtLate iighway and Public Works comission, and that upon the completion o. tne work the State Hichway ana rublic tesville the cost of the curb and guttering works Commission would pay to the City of Sta project out of the funds provided for such purpose under tne provisions of Uhapter 217 and the appropriations of the Public Laws of 1941, Sections 1 througs 4, as amended, made pursuant to that act. Fe . ch al ‘lle and the State Highway 7, That it was understood by the Uity 9% statecville and th pre aed 4 : ' -urb and g£ pro ject and Public works Commission that upon tiie completion 02 tne curb and gutter proyec b ; ' : —— ic worl /Oidiission 'y the private contracting concern, tuie State hl, uway av Public works v0 Ss ou : cl a twee he curbs Would pave those portions of the said section of tHe salisbury Koad between ¢ ad gutters abd the 18 foot paverent then existing so as to com lete a road or highway 36 feet in width from curb to curb; that tne paving was to be done solely by tne otate ‘ighway and Public Works Commission and was not a part oi tnecurb and cutter project though the new pavement was to be paid for from tne saue source a& the curb and uters; that is, out of the funds provided oy the General Assembly ior use in tne “ity of elatesville by the State Highway and Public works Vomuission under the visions of the sane said Vhapter 217 of the Public Laws of 1941, sections 1 through 4, ag amended, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WELK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TEhh, 1952 Friday, December l2th, 1952 8, That pursuant to the agreement of the North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission to the aforesaid curb and gutter project, the City of statesville caused to be published in the Statesville Daily Record frox, July 9 throuvh duly 19, 1951, a notice stating that tne Board ot Aldermen of the vity of otatesville had declared tne Salisbury oad from Bast rront Street to the city limits an improvement zone and tuat curb and gutters would be laid on said roaq 9. That the Board or aldermen of tie Vity ot otavesville advertised for bids on the curb and utter proje ( undertak 1 sai i n t ‘ tter project to be undertaken on said portion of the Salisby Road; that the low bid was received from Gilbert Sngineering Vompa 1 the arount i 3, 80.0 n sontrect for } : tter works 2 ’ i -veCr work Wa re iat dilbert inzineer vompany, contingent 9 ompany, itingent upon the approval of the State highway a eee Si ae ln id ae er - and Public \.orks Commission, and the setling aside of funds for that purpose as p ided for by the sai ‘he rt bli provided for by the said Uhapter 217 of the Public Laws of 1941, Sections 1 through FIRST wae SUPERIOR COURT en ———— IRST WEEK --- DECEMBER SPECIAL Tih, 19 iG Friday, December 12, 1952 on oe 1e eastern city limits of the City of Statesville, was actwlly and sereet and tl paid for by the State Highway and Public Works Comission out of funds in fact, provided for use onstreets and hi-shways in the bity 0. Statesville by the General bly of Nortna Varolina, in accordance with tne metaod provided for in vhapter Asset. 217 of the Public Laws of 1941, sections l through 4, as auwended; or any other improvements for which Ssaidassessments purport to nave been levied That no part ol tue cost of the curb and gutter improvenents/were paid for by the vity of Statesville out of its general iund or any other fund for wnaich tue vity was not immediately reimbursed. 15. That at the Yctober >, 1951, regular meetin, oi tue soard oildermen of the “ity of Statesville, it was moved tat an asseSsient O01 tne owners ol the roperty on the Salisbury Xoad be made forthe curb and gutter improvements at the next regular meeting of the Board of Aldermen, and thav notice be given by publication of the assessment to be made. Pal 1 Pa Le 16, that notices of the special assessment for curb gutters were lished ' f T 4 Wer ‘ He . 1 . i! St.3 eyi . 4 ce ana 99 Qc ' ate , ee eee | 10. That the State Hi-shway and Public Works Commission approved of the in the Statesville Daily on October 15 and ec, 1951, listing tue property ovners, amounts of the liens to be assessed their front footages on the highway, and tie — ts notified all interested persons 1 i curb and futter co wit! Ened ‘ \ 1 | i ter contract with Gilbert tngineering Company. agains. each abutting »roperty; and that said notices a The tr ‘ y sri) + r , . + 1 . . That the curb and gutter improve:.ents, together with other improvenerss, to appear and to show cause why such assess ents ¢ vld not be made. i i = | 1] iF : on the said portion of U. o. dighway No. 70, a,so known as the Salisbury Road, were completed on or about the 20th day of september, 1951; that snortly thereafter the City Engineer of the City of Statesville reported to the Board of Aldermen that tie curb and gutter work was completed, attaching to nis report a list oi tne purported owners oi the abutting properties; their respective front footages on said highway; and the amounts of the liens to be charged against each parcel of real property fronting on said hi hway. 12. That the original contract of $23,250.00 provided for curb and gutter improvenen g i : m4 ; P ent to a point suort of the eastern city limits of the Uity of statesville, but as the work prorresse s j i ore progressed and as the Vity completed tne laying of a sewer line to the city limits he sai ; ; y ts, the said curb and gutter improvements were completed to the easter city limits at a total cost of p27 419.35; i e ’ £3; DL. } vs , . ? that the vity of otatesville paid from its street fund the cost of the curb and gutter work ($27,419.35) to Gilbert snginevring Company; and that the vity of Statesville promptly submitted to the otate His hway and Public Works Come mission an invoice covering the cost of the curb and gutter project; that said e said gue vity invoice called f é yme » 39” 4 for an payment of $27,419.35; that upon tue receipt of th invoice the State Hip Kees : ighway and Public works Commission issued its check 0 of Statesvilie t inbursge 3 , : S oO reimourse it for its payment to Gilbert Engineering Companys Li . that ti 3 way : tue curb and gutter improvenents on that portion of U.¥* High ont No. kK » S ; 70, known as the Salisbury “oad, in the City of statesville between East Fr 17, That at the recular meeting of the Board offAldermen of the City of Jstatesville on November 2, 1951, a protest was received from the property owners on the Salisbury doad objecting to the assessments on the ground tuat tue assessuentas attempted to be levied was not legal, and \.as not petitioned for by the adjoining land owners; and that the protest of the property owners was tabled as being invalid by the ‘card of Aldermen, My 0 4 ee ee : , smher 2 Q 18, That at the same repular meeting of the soard ot Aldermen on November <, 1951, 1 ordinance was enacted assessing the property abutting the Salisbury koad from “ast Front Street co the city limits for the curb and gutter improvements. Said Minutes of the ond: ‘ ve dmnce on record in linute Book 6, pages 423, 42h, and 425, of the ! Boa PATA pe ‘ td of Aldermen of the City of Statesville, North Carolina. 19, That certain owners of the property abutting on the Salisbury Koad within Aldermen who were affected by the assessments the : limits prescribed by the Board of “wed by the aforesaid ordinance, filed objections to the assessments within thirty d from the decision of the Board of days ‘ after the assessments were made, and appeale r Court of Iredell County; that they served Alderm : en to the next term of the Superio e and specified MWtice of + he city of Statesvill heir intention of appealing upon ¢ in Sid notice the grounds for their objections to the action of the Board of ame time tuey filed the bond Alde "men of the City of Statesville; and that at the s re, Uired of ¢ hem, wwe gs yewaa Via aa. 7 aE — a a ee oe ou ae 2 eee eo IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Friday, December 12th, 1952 From the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Court concludes as a matter of law th é followins: 1. That the procedure followed by the Voard of Aldermen of the City of st otates. ville in declarins an improvement district on the Salisbury Road from East 7 “8 Last Front Street to the city limits of the City of Statesville; the procedure followed tif ” “ novify-~ ing the public of the improvement district; the procedure followed in advertis; ing A r bine easy pe _ . for bids for the curb and gutter construction project; the procedure followed in letting the bid for the construction of tne curb and gutter; the procedure by which the property owners o! properties abutting the Salisbury Koad were notified of the proposed assessment; and the manner in which the ordmance was adopted assessing the buttins the Salisbury toad was all in accordance wits the procedure directec by Article VII, sections 39,through 49, of the statesville City Uharter ’ mended, (Private Laws of 1911, Chapter 243, sections 39 through 49) 2. That the method lowed by th sit ' Ste j i ifyi ethod followed by the Vity of Statesville in notifying the public establishment ofAhe improvement district; the advertisement for bids for the curd and ”) . rn cr rmiA s e 4 » } g } : utter construction work; and the notices of the special assessment were advertised for the correct number of days in a newspaper, published in Statesville, North Carolina and tial they we:e in accordance with the procedures and methods out- lined by the General Assembly of North Varolina in Article VII, sections 39 through 49, of the Statesville City Charter, as amended, (Private Laws otf 1911, Chapter 2h} sections 39 through 49). 36 That the Vity ’ Ste syi 140 ~ 4 y ol otatesville did not pay any amount oi money out 02 its zeneral f he improv. oi g und for the ixprovements to that portion of U. S. Highway No. 70, known as the Salisbury ko: ; t) vs , P ry oad in the vity of Statesville, from its intersection with East Front Street to the Stay oe j t e city limits, as is expressly declared as necessary in the provi Sion contained in Arti Vi nied er A cle VII, Section 43, of the Statesville vity Uharter, as amended, \lrovate Laws oi 1911, Uhapter 243, section 43 , +S ) 7 le Th t the cost oi constructi OSt Oi Constructing the curb and gutter on tie aforesaia portion of U. S. Highway N y No. 70, known as the Salisbury Road, in the City of Statesville, was vaid for by the Nc eee ; y e North Carolina State Highway and public Works Commission out of Cunds appropriated r use in ‘s PProP i ior use in tue Vity of Statesville by the General Assembly from time to time, and i c : » and in accordance with the provisions of Uhapter 217 of the Public Laws of 1¢ S$ amendec 9 ws of 1941, as anended, (General Statutes 136-36, through 136-40). 5. That the cost of the ef . . ne cost olf the construction of curb and guiter on the road above refert to was pai r : paid for by tax proceeds already paid b- the public, including the owners . the abutting gat : ting lands on the said Salisbury load, and allocated for a specific use on IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL Tukh, 1952 Friday, December 12th, 1952 and streets as provided ior by tue said Chapter 217 otf tiie Puolic Laws highways of 19hl, 28 amended, (General statutes 136-36 through 136-40). 6, That the city of Statesville was reimbursed ior all oi the money expended for those items for which the assessments purport to have been levied. 7. ‘That the assessments levied by tue Board of aldermen of the Vity of Statesville by ordinance adopted November 2, 1951, recorded in liinute Book 6, the minutes o: the Jo rd of Aldermen of tue vity of pages 423, 424, and 425, of Statesville, North Carolina, are not in accordance with tne law and are null and yoid and of no force anda effect. It is, therefore, ORUERED, AUJUDGED, AND DeCRELD that the ordinance tesvil.e assessing the abutting enacted by the Board of Aldermen of the City of ot Bast Front <treet lots of land on the Salisbury Koad in the City of statesville fro! to the city limits (Minute Book 6, pages 423, 424, 42), November 2, 1951, Minutes ind the same is hereby of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Statesville) is, and ieclared to be null and void and of no force and effect, and the said lands fronting and abutting on said Salisbury Road are hereby freed anda discharged of any and all ant, City of 1 + he af 1d tne adeérenau liens by reason of such ordinance and assesSsi.cntS; al Statesville is hereby taxed with the cost of this action. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Citv of Statesville, through its Mayor and Board of Aldermen, have stricken ane cancelled acai - the tands arainst tile dadllue from its assessment books those liens and assessi ealisbury Road by reason of the aforesaid ordinance. This 12 day of December, 1952. W. K. iicvean ai r ? ive yy ee W. k. licbLean, Judge Presiding December 1952 Special term Iredell County »upersior vourt mo OK No, 5191 WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUP#AIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY DECEMBER SPECIAL Tut, 1952 SHAVER MOVOR ¢ .— = =V- THR 4 0 HE CITY oj STATESVILLE | Judgment To the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and /udgm ’ and in open 7 “bjectors or Plaintiffs and the Defendant objects and excepts, Further Notice waived. Co wt give notice of appeal to the Supreme PONEy IN THis SUPERLOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- DECEMBER SPECIAL TERM, 1952 Friday, December 12th, 1952 The defendants are allowed fii'ty days in which to make and serve case on appeal and tue plaintiffs are allowed 30 days thereafter in which to file exceptions or to make and serve countercase. Upon the plaintiff's appeal, the plaintiffs are allowed fifty days to make and serve case on anneal and the defendants are allowed 30 days thereafter in which to file exceptions or serve countercase,. It is understood and agreed that both the plaintiffs and the defendant shal} file in detail their exceptions to the *indings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and to the signing of this Judgment, and that the same snall constitute a part of their record on appeal. W. K. McLean JUDG PRESIDING Wo. 537 yharle er vs i » S371 harles H Pluwnumer vs Thelma wilson Plummer «-------------..-.- vont inued io. 5378 Clarence L Little vs Irene Litt j ittle vs lrene i Little ««-------~-.-..-/--.---- -- Continued a ids ties cs peddiceh as Aude Be ; 3 1 > wtafford vs Louis Lester Stafford «w3«5wwnwnnnnnnnnne Continued No. 231 mT Pratt vs vomer a ai aici ah slate eg ie aa caine avon diel Continued aNo 28 ryo] 7 . Bie ’ - ' 4 arvei Vale : eyne vs vlarence Morrison acessscnsncneeuscunecen Continued ‘No. 26 Thomas H White vs 53 omas i White vs nerbert D W poten « Joyce Wooten eoonnence= Continued No. 53 hi } s - : ‘i a : 5347 Moouy White vs La. liiss. Pipe Line Vonst Co ---------------- Continued Noe ! 9 Blackweld : : . 5345 suena eer Furniture Co & N Mh Blackwelder ve G 4 Cook c ” 2 “ m/s ~ 5 d 2 * Herman Brame T/* B @ C Furniture Co «----------- eweeeceee Continued i No. 5206 James | i ° ames L willer vs locas ay . 1s f . as a : i er vS Ww wosSsS Vay, George H Smith & Fred w Hud son-Continued No 36 Je > alias _ Wo. 5367 Jonn Rell wallace vs Mrs Ida ki Keller R L Keller eeoen--o- - Continued ello. 5378 Ularence L Littl i iu , e | Civil Docket, December vpecial term, 1952 vs Irene l.orrison Little Upon motion nt? r J 4 ’ A@i Gnd it that ie be Llowed to file an Amended Answer, tne l.otion i r } d . or ri - Llo jays in which to file Amended Answ°"; na i€ i 1 4 i 4 pa > J le eo ‘ . ‘ se ” O days thereafter in which to file a Reply oF othe plead. Plaintiff excepts, A juror is withdrawn and a mistr3 ; awn and a mistrial ordered, and the case is continued. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --DiCXiBER SPECIAL Takh, 1952 vit Friday, December 12th, 1952 i tio. 4956 orth CAROLINA REVELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | , Sloan aM Plaintiff i JUDGMENT Monroe Adams and W. eR Batt ley , Administrators of M. G. Sloan, deceased, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the Deceuber, 1952 Special fern of Iredell County Superior Court before his Honor W. K. heLean, Judge Presiding, and the parties hereto having agreed to waive a jury and to allow tne Court to hear the evidence and find the facts and render Judgment thereon, tue pla intiff proceeded to introduce evidence in support of his contentions and the defendant offered no evidence ; estate of ».. G. Sloan was indebted + The Court found the following facts: that tne to the plaintiff for the following items paid by tne plaintiff for M. G. Sloan. Baptist Hospital-Winston Salem 350.00 1/10/52 Stevenson Brothers-Boring Well 192.15 4/22/27 Roofing for barn 88.64 11/19/36 Dr. Robertson 50.00 3/15/43 46.50 6/10/45 Dr. Robertson 1945, 1946, 1947 and 1948 Co. Taxes 8 ere evidence that the plaintiff has The Court further finds as a fact from the collected the rents from the farm owned by ls. G. Sloan, deceased for the years 1945-52 inclusive and that he is entitled to retain the rents for caring for the ‘ora, maintaining the buildings thereon, and looking after the interest of the estate for these years but that the plaintiff should pay the taxes due by the tate Ol i. G. Sloan for the years 1949, 1950, 1951, and 1952 and that said taxes now amount to ! 9101.02 and that this amount should be deducted from the amount hereinabove found to be¥ due to the plaintiff. judgec ed that the plaintiff It is, therefore, ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed that tne Pp , Battley, Administrators of ’N, Sloan have and recover of Monroe Adams amd w. ht. h, G, Sloan, deceased, the sum of $386.14 with int rest thereon from the 7 * “als Judgment until paid. It is further ordered that the sum of 555.87 of tnis | hudguent representing taxes paid shall be and it is hereby declared a preferred cain cne costs of this G. vioan, t hat inistrators of M. wW. K. McLean Judge Presiding Nf Kes It is further oruered, a . G4lmst the estate of M. G. Sloan. , and W. R. Battley, Adm a ; ow taxed arainst Monroe Adams e Th . ®eased. This 12th day of December, 1952. YNo. 5364 North Carolina Iredell vounty N. M. Benfield Plaintiit VSe RK. &. Cansler Defendant Hs S 4 4 Y enna: | Aq LU runer apdpea $ { ie i) pleading nas been filed by} Ti if This cause coming on judgement arainst the defendant And it appear { in this Ct1or And it ir r anvea In the Superior Court Judgment to be heard before the Honorable C. Jd, Smith, Clerk of the Superior vourt oi Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for lefault and inquiry; the court that a verified complaint was filed and to the 12 day of Sept., 1952; aring to the court that said summons, together with served on tne defendant on the 16 day of sept., ring to the court tiat no answer, demurrer, or omer ielendant and no extension of time to file pleadings Lime within wuichn pleadings may be Lileu has expired, ‘ — wv aa ; A uU / is LS, u + “9 / 4Cr’, au jua Cu, Asis jecreeu tnat une plaintiff have | na reco iefendant Jor such damaces to be executed at the next civil ter.. oitue superior Court of Iredell County, before a jury to determine Gi ount ol s i eS. ' I ot La’ ) sCC er, 1952. | C. G. Smith : Clerk of tne ouperior vourt | . | x Wo. 5382 : i NORTH CAROLINA, IN H&S SUPERIOR COURT i . IRD did +. it Davie “lectric i.eubership | | Corporation, a orporation, ae Plaintiff, } } : Hi Vs. JUDGMENT y UV. U. nedmond, rloyd Red: md, at ind Dexter Redmond, l Vefendants, | This cause coming on of the Superior | of the defendants by default é vourt ol Lredel] vounty, upon motion by the plaintiff for jud — Clerk to be heard before the Honorable C. U. Smith, gment ina inquiry: And it a pearing to the court tuat verified Complaint was tiled and ‘ i 0) 5 a wage ee od ie : ons issued in this action on October 6, 1952; and it further a pearing to the wan ? § urt tual the summons together with a copy of the vomplaint and a sopy of the C0 issued by liis Honor, Zeb V. Netiles, J dge holdin; tne court of aestraining Order ne Fourteenth Judicial District on October 8, 1952, were served on the defendants th October 10, 1952; and it further appearing to the Vourt that no answer, Vemurrer on or other pleadings have been filed by the defendants or either of them, or no tension of time to file pleadings has been granted Lo the defenuants or either ext - a of them, and the time in whic: pleadings may be riled has expired; + ’ IT IS VHERLPOu Oven, AvJUUGED And UVOCKELU, that the plaintiff have and recover judgment against the defendants as prayed for in the Complaint, and as a vury nay determine; and court costs, and that the inou:ry ne facts a.leged in the ‘omplaint be executed at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell vounty beginning December 8, 1952 before a vurye Signed and entered in Statesville, worth » rrolina on UVecewer 6, 1952. C,. G. smith sail C. G. omith, LUlerk of vuperior Court Wo. 5429 lorth Carolina, In the ocuperior vourt. Iredell County. Irene Morrison Little | vs, | slarence L. Little | : ae oral 3. G. Smith, Clerk of This cause coming on to be heard belore hi norable U. Ue. vmiln, — : : , . o ‘ _ . ‘ e -in to tne » ourt “uperior Vourt o: Iredell County, North Carolina, and it a il - on me a4 iff les res to taKke from a Statenmt of the Attormeys for tie plaintiff tnav the plaintil esi 4 Non-suit in this action; i t he | aintiff be non-suited and It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintill be taxed with t e Lone costs. C. G, Smith ‘ vo oa Clerk ouperior Vourt, Tredeil County, ° “asented to: Tene y “rrison Little ainti ee ' INo. 4975 NORTH CanOLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL CUUNTY Universal Refining Products Company, Incorporated Plaintiff Statesville Vorporation coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the llonorable slerk of the Superior Court o: Iredell Cc unty, and it appearing nt oL Vounsel for the Plaintiff and tne Jefendant “nings in controversy have been settled between the Plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its ind decreed that the Plaintiff be charged by the Clerk, C. G. Smith UVlerk of the Superior Court blee Plaintiff — inberry ttorneys lefendant Pn A Ho. 5384 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, iA “OUNTY OF TREDELL. wil0 Le Tiok COMPANY, ae Plaintiff, -ySe- 1? We ‘ Dp yam (\N THE HITCHUOUA CORPOmaAd ION ; Defendant. a a pe 307 Oy Phat, pers tty) PITRE. bo te Bhs IN TRE SUPERIOR COURT. FINAL JUDGLANT THIS CiUSE Coming on to be heard before UC. G. smith, C. &. 6. of tue Superior Court oi Iredell County, and it appe between the parties and things in controversy tuat they do consent that final Judgment herei NOW, THERssOkz, by consent of the JREED that the plaintiff have and recover and that the defendant have and recover and that this action be dismissed. half of the costs tobe taxed by the This 16 day of December, 1952. BLLO L. TEER COMPANY Nello L, Teer, Jr, srooks, M@Lendon Brim Holderness ee ?. Farthing AA, vollier Attaneys THE Hicucarr i Me A VEG YAALU AL LUN Kester Wajton, Vice President <arkins, Va mata Winkle, Walton & Buck G. Ber: ard Attorneys , aring to the Vourt that all matter: ave been satisfactorily settled and in this action, Sross~: tion, ne= . m4 +} Ue VLE rk Superior 998 Shot theres tmp PBR yk shee gs JNo. 5349 WORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COU In THE OU PERLOR COURT yORTH CAROLINA, N Th UPHERIOR COURT 3lacuwelder vurniture vompany TREDELL COUNTY. BerORE Vila CLERK and NN. i. Slackiwelcer senda) Fuel Gompany, Incorporated, Plaintiff, in hier ite JUDGiiNT Oi WON SUIT Vs. Jarvis I hamrick Jervis 5. damricx, ing and doing ousinesS aS U1 ; e al oal Joupany , aAtah VOUOUD appeari were ser . lefendants, answer until = Pers 518 in-o sCadinzs aes *xpired, Pres, And ++ Cy > behel st: ine t Ene ur ‘Tol tne ve rified UOl plaint t nat “auSe Of action consi S é "Peacn ¢ n expressea © yitract to pay a sum Ol ‘ixed by the co ‘ ‘ gs Thepe Hundred, *Sorty-four y the contract, namely, > Sum three Hundrea, foreynse nts, (331) . ' tote of ner cent } annum irom » (9344.04) with interest thereon rate pss i _ ~ oust 17, 1951, until paid. NOW , I'l AD DECKSED, that the plaintiff ’ Maio UAL ’ Li Jit uit bl , AJd UUGsU ave and ran ' Thre forty-four Dollars “nd recover of the defendants the sum of Three rorty-L0u ’ ind Po ne yer cent pe ar Cents, ($341.04), with interest thereon 4 ' ‘hum fro i August 17, 1951, and the cost ol this actione - nae, ‘ n Carolina, on Signed and entered in Statesville, Iredell County, North » ’ waaber 18, 1952, Clerk of ~Yuperior vour | 1) GO.» Ve Smith —r= Court, sredel Vountye : | / No. 5430 NORTH CanOLIwa TREDELL COUNTY David Cyrus nowell vs. Pegey Brady Howell In the Superior Court MOTION “OR JUDG LNT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT — SES Now comes William Kk. Pose, attorney Vor the Plaintiff in the above titled c be iid would respectfully saow unto the Court that the Vefendant t.roucn her next of friend had comuenced an action Yor divorce prior to the action coimaenced by tis Plaintiff; that at the time of filing tnis action the P) tiff did not ow of the prior action riled by the Vefendant. 21 re, the Plaintiff in the above entitled cause res; ectfully prays ( r a { Voluntary Nonsuit be entered in the above entitled cause. Chis 15th day of Vecember, 1952. William Xk. Pope attorney for rlaintif NORTH CadcOLIN In the Superior vourt ib sau id Vavid vyrus howell VS. Fegry vrady uowell mm . , . . This cause coming on t Superior Court of Iredell Voun r\Y ~ »4 = t ’ appearin vO tne vu rt tnat ta 2a need ants P ns CO neea action ior action, and that tnis fact was aa institution + his action. It is therefore ordered suit be, and it i: divorce prior to the time that the Plaintifi JUDGMENT Or VOLUNTARY NONSUIT ~~ ee o be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the ty, “orth Carolina, and being heard, and it e Jefenuant in the above entitled cause ad instituted this p unknown to :his Plaintiff at the time oi tue and decreed that a Judgm above entitled action. UG, G, omith Ulerk ouperior vourt nt of Voluntary Nos 5331 North Caro lina In the Superior Court Iredell] County Tilliam L. Allison, trading and joing 27siness as “Statesville vaufacturing Yompany", PLAINTIFF oo —<— oOo vs. JURE MENT seston Corporation, DEFENDAIT ) This cause coming on to ve heard, and oeing heard vefore the Honorable carl G. Smith, Clerk of Su erior Court of Iredell vowmity, Nortn var ylina, and it appearing to the VYourt from the statement o ne attorney for the vlaintiff that the matters and things in controversy have be settled svetween the parities anc that the pla’ntiff nas elected to take a non-suit ints action; It is, cherefore, o red, a ed, and decre that the pla ff be on-suited and be taxed with the costs to be charge the Clerk. This 29th day of December, 1952. Y Cun te C. Je wMmitNn Clerk Suvertor court ak xe 2 us ; No, 5278 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i, : & B. Company of Statesville, Inc. | 7 | JUDGMENT NON-SUIT & A. Bowlin i This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable ©. G. Smith, Clerk of Su Prior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Cou ™ from a Statement of the Attorney for the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff desires to ¢, ake a non-suit in this action; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be non-suited and b ® taxed With the costs. Th is the 9th day of January, 1953. C, G, Smith Clerk Superior Vourt Iredell County, N. Ce exeeee eee He