The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1950-1951 Mirrofilmed by North Carolina Department of Archives and History Division of Archives and Manuscripts Raleigh, North Carolina se Lio NOe 4550 otis in the Superior Jourt TROT my iar 1 : wad ses , *atol @taCT; Beginning at a stake on valdwell Street, 35=./2 feet a Poa ’ from the cement corner of valdwell and wills 3 North’ 70 f Before the Clerk a stake. Rashtc ner? thenwe mace ee falls Street; thence North 70 feet to o- ake, Rash's corner; tnence lest 100 feet to a stake on A, J, Kennedy's ik thence with Kennedy's line, South 70 feet to a Stake; thence Vest eet with J. . Kennedy's line to the beginning, being the identical land conveyed to .. hi, Dauwiels by R. 4, Daniels Tredell County aniels and isinnie Dy Plaintiffs dle a @ compton, and wife, by deed dated a ; : , : ? ’ 4 dune 17, 1947, and recorded in Deed Sook 196, page 129 oi' Reco: abe e hon NIT RY ’ Poy JGHANT BY DErAULT FINAL ds f Iredell ¢ N JUDG I il Deeds for Iredell vounty, Ni. C,. “de ~ Tus olf ee eee, wei All of Lots Nos. 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 and 58 of the sub- division <nowm ae tte de urdock Property” in Statesville: North Carolina a general map of wi 1S recorded in Plat Book page 125 of ' ' , hoa n3 yor : chapman \.augna ee ee i : c ; . eam a | ao cords for Iredell c unty, North Carolina, reference to wiic — — orable C. G. Smith, Clerk made for further cescription and being the identical lots e He te Janiels by R. Le. lwrdock and wite, by deed dated Novem lina, upon motion hy the plaintiffs 1916 and recorded in Deed Book 182, pase 301 of Records of iredell County, N. Cc, vounty, iefault final; and, ar - . It is further appearing to the Court and the Court findine as a fact a duly veriiied complaint was filed AULY that lef : 1 na 7 Arian a4 y - : 7 ac Tar) } ” } } nat tne defendant ma title is unfounded and tiuat the defendant has the l b! cone ee en ae ae eee atned Phe 44 14andS a VNaG LINE pu ntl ei ill eis aati rignt, title, interest, property or estate in fis, ,ourt 19 anda sal wie : . . Ne te Janiels and i.imnie D. Compton are the owers o: said lami in fee simple aa A ahhh + on the i ‘ os : . - and are entitled to imnediate possession thereof; T+ it 1S therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed tha a =e sy a 2 deena pourt ta : ows ‘J minnie D. Compton are the owners a: nants in comuon and —— Se a n motion o 1d ams earkan 4 : i } } i i i } ’ >tion upon : Simple and are en 1 to the imnx it sessic all of the lands here- above describe tree irom any claim of the defendant, Frances Chapn: (augh; a a and, 1.ecreed tiat and no further . eo a oe ae - an augn nas no ri ii - © De , interest +m ithin : : time wi inabove described, his the ,ourt yuest or potion + A ired by law; has f bond has 4 >; an interest Cauadinvo ior ce through or uncel isin P thr ouga 0 ‘loud on the title of — . et that tH and the Court finding 4s a fa ‘ . - at law of Be he ers uv ). Compton are the sole neirs | | th day © the 17 ae ukahe. h Carolina, on ls, who died intestate in Iredell County, North va ; y inheritant? ion b . ‘ . at aa ¢ nts in com February,1949 and ar ne owners in fee simple as tenalve 1s of land, . Tee r parce from the said H. R. Daniels of the following described lots 0 . being the land described in the complaint herein, viz: nT L428 NOe HOVE in the Superior Court eIust TRACT: Beginning at a stak 1 eae . f +} ee - beginning at a stake on Caldy . 35— fee Iredell County Before the Clerk “rom tne cement corner of Caldwell and sills 3 Sale, Wh Rect c Trede “4 tash's corner; thence West 100 feet to a stake . oe tee , er oe ine; thence with Kennedy's line. South 70 ee Kennedy's or ee 100 feet with ). & onan bes aed eoutn 70 fee 9 a stake: then: est R. L Slaintift vith J. &. Kennedy's line cinnd ine the identd Zompton, Plaintiffs land conveyed to u. R. Dauiels by Rob. bars ne? ee my y_IeN nv ’ 4 NM mrt. e 7 Q y ry 2 5 Lae aie wae tbe oe ’ i da 3 Jer AULT FINAL poms ti, 1947, and recoried in Deed 3oo0k -— Yeeds for Iredell County, N.C. a Tt} \y GUS 1d i North Carolina Vse Pray s Chapman Waugh COND TRACT: Pl rrances il es iant AD eB ue xs a at 1RACT: all of Lots Nos. 53 ee a and 5é r ul I S Oaadue division “now as WT> , - : ces ; a a Vili’ Suv] mas “ae Le lurdock Property’? in ve a general map of which is aici in fi ot in. irolina, o. thc } lL ‘ Pa e¢ n rla bd K cords for Iredell County North C: alina Fatale’ o j - be | ¢ 4 oracle OC. G. Smith, Clery made for further deasvinisan a ens Veteran Walch Is hereby ,Clerk nage Lor f ner cescription and being the identica 5 conv to Be te. Vaniels by R. 7 Rio oes eens een a eee ee ee ie Gece S OY He de lurdock and wife, by dated November 2 a. is ; Pes : gs P : 3( z t ( 1S olL eeas ior 1916 and recorded in Jeed Book 182. pa-e iredell County, WN. Cc, —s : 5 This cause coming on to Court of Iredell vounty, upon motion by the plaintifts d al; and, it is further appearing to the Court and the Court Pitti ae 5 ie defendant Oo to the Court that verified complaint was filed ha he defendant's claim a title is unf endant's claim a title is uni ied and 2 lefend; ae 2 t 1S untounaed and tuat the defendant why a itle Snton NrAanc ~ ; . as = eames Eide tea cae rhe) At, title, interest, pz perty or estate in said lands and that the sarine to the Court that said summons together with | nee 2 aniels ang 4 : . | 2 : ae ¢ Janiels and i.imnie DL. Compton are in fee served on the defendant on the 19th day of April, oe a a ss Screed ; ; and are entitled to imnuediate possession thereof: ereof; were taat kr. Le. Daniels and . te at 2 : . ake ee — ’ +0 1S tUnererore oraered, AE JU & ec and aecreed ‘ + f y Court th of h.ay,1949, ee pic minnie DU. Compton are the tenants in comuion and are seized in fee upon motion and Winberry ae r Simple and are entitled to the imuediate po session of all of the lands re possessior ft all ol the lands here- jant, inabove described, free fro: nabdove described, free from any an waughs Jaughs imons, ley ~ Of ~s ‘ and, r filin nswer in this a , nt , . ° oe oo ds is ar a 1} @| ana ecreed tiat 4 /* aa 5 + + Lncverest no further an nan .augh has no righ itle, esta within : bias inabove described. my This the er as a fact, that Clerk Superior Court Yn Ash ndant has failed iefend : fan request or potion 40 wired by law; has nt of bond has iefendant claims an interest UCL Gsssre ws he he } jer herein arising througa or unce ti Shi al »*Loud on tne title ol tne as a fact that ti? the Court and the Court findins of Be Be It are the sole heirs on the 17th y inherit ance day of plaintiffs, nie D lJaniels, who in lredell vounty, North Carolina, a 4 on b February,1949 s in fee simple as tenants in comm goes J s arcels of land, from the said s,. R. Daniels of the following described lots or P being the land described in the complaint herein, viz: Court non-suit, y "tr ’ Superior , voiunta 2 In the takes t S ot mot oO Ma os c> S » iS) oO r eS te —_ " BEE AB hy IO a ae ee ee Se No. 4800 North Carolina In the Superior Coane Iredell County Auto Paris and Electric Compapy vs JUIGHENT OF NON-SUIT B. Winkler and Fred A Winkler In this cause the pla intiff takes a voluntary non-suit and decreed that the action be non-suited at the ~~ + January, 1950, onith muperior Court /Ollier pirs + ait de @ ae pel #72 Chit): 0 Lea A, afpe ion Cease Gate ss $3,257.25 € 363, 304 470, 437 IAiSau Sage 307” . ODapandir, 1 ome mae #4 3/0 _ Rute Pais lo eli %& F¢7 _ Mame. Mair} 771. B¢7 —— lipan ler, ¢ yea ve qh ~ LOC Ahsan = MU ap sia H/a Ets “p07 Chl. aor. . DH, ian lala A). 43a leheNGhal ? Loctoce QD Yy9 2] / 4 | SB baw: Be oo K Sy Co &. Rep ) pois» af 19.) /F-/93 1/27 YD ee Ie’ os ‘e 34 JQ2BIS9 sot es a 3s ae —_ Fcrtal Hore bY, F4--FE ar’ ill L- (E. IS brictl, Arek. a. f - Seki), Glrrle/ 1 97, 259,260, 1a) SY S37 nal. Dilan. 771K ) a / Satlhy, , MB. ea ee pe JN L2inttt ; or etal [a , JAb IAD ys Szg Gack Finan, | 7217 3 3¢,i29 ee Ce ee Ay, Psa a Yo Faker? Q ental. (bf /70,/77, 235 37 Slackhy 5 Sammut LL AI3, 477 ats, —pro @ CLL ie ae ; Bett. Ze 2 ee cin 265, a Jaf grees me = 274, 273 Lvs? AV 1301 y 3055 37F 2r* 297, Bait, al So ¥ » 396, WT Lic + oe IF, I22 ap FRebent: aniisy IJ 7 2G 2 Grannen, Wonn. S55535 6, 557 Fel sion uk S67 | PLO | Eins Sol sq, 44% ‘a seh Siu, BEA | | ra : U) ' YN 4° ® . on e °. -” — ai ne, ~~ —1- oY sige tiie? oy, POF E fear’ lla hE FA breil, A teed AY. f? eee Dttrr Lz 277, AD 9,260, 1a) S¥L S3/ 7 QaN- CO a» 7A yo o/ Sarl, + dS) j/2 4 ,/34,5 i KJ L722 Ltl » Ap. bal la , JA IAL ys Aap. agi, Fan, |7aN7- f 30,432 a a. a iM lel |e Zab Chamic AP. [bf /90,177, 234 atk Saclay Ss SA rreee — AI3, 477 , a t4/ 27a, 27.3 On bret, R AN 4 30l 5 3035 37F Late Gt ° 2%, bak, ReoedA X.Dr- 279 Sh w Sev i, 596, “TG Aur, Rotat f. . 3/3 hi Jara Silla R SF, Vg F-2 2 Las okoe ~—_ere Biman, they E: S9553 PSC, SS'7 @ Uubin of gal Bile 07 Kiang 370 40 Clee 3h, iu, 44% | _ (Wh PAsbe— 4 dacl B LPF Ms o8a a atti 39/ . - gFEe BD nen yo, si pad hithad Posse e ae jaa Vp Ser 3 ise tite bs 9 ade (Gan latches) Yvt 2 Cine. ag € of 2 —y “GA vn Dechssite, rey 4 _ =e? oun ar ae 4 (f. Cte. Oe, f?. Gé s / 6 / A AAO ha t — ) aon Br Cerne atl E P. Z 2 r Bor atc Reade. S/F _ OF te. Coro Ji 7- //f Bate ~ a BM Canpeletd, 17.7, Jad 5 S21. ) a : Pi i ee Oo : | Wile (Lees IY en GZ .IB/ “£ 6 yriar S$ LZ </ yW @ .8 tis" = ert a eS oo . (7? | ? es - S CUtryAlL, Gee /74, 122 C. S56 bakes > 3 C ff { A Chr , hee2kez & s La 42 JJ - buh. = ud. Se. 449 _ la et Coe vitae ff LPG ASS ita E> y ) : ce ) Lo. S06 os a 2! lL, DS. PP [75 t = Fale lua A. 2354 5014, $08 395-4 9s. #6 a Ceerlig) Bla S&S. 294 oe Siete itil CL oa oplhalCisccCle so ¢/ E| : Fitti Ce -. 264 | fe shan, Stl, Hin_hl A707 | a Cork, 7, 44, 508 Mi a FoR, FIP BIs- — Cok, othe 307, 508 - = SO \yQe — Coe oa -SAV on 2 ve _ z 72 FS 4 SA + , S Ae B87, wey, +f — ie Ch) AX © SY, 292, 4 of, ££ 7 [Berge amo : | * Qjorliewe Bel. FIN AKT, SH 3-S HS * ae Cth, j Cx PAST, gf § re "4 3 -4afar | _é etd Qi he < ES ece wae 2 ce | WE Can, phen Ler £74 ; | | ie Oe hat z = rr ss 3. yo 6, | | ge h) 21 L537 | rs & PAL | a F#L FIZ S41 5E8 re ay JS) S72 Ne ba Ce 0. 4, ~ - . Le st | ] : ' i SL ONT on | | — Cas e AHP, 101 s af it A Other 5%G| | | Peden | Y i. | ep Cah, QMS. Saf |. ae id a eae ‘i Bare ern SIS TGO0 ee r f A. ALIA 7 / —— ae thheearr’ > KL ie ae Ea . : an . roe S RTE EE ) Ven — Wa Mor Locce/ £2 Fs AY tee coe, 7? Re {90 v Gauithe/! A ¥ Gahan J0£ Ott , Merthbla / /b \Ejtrtem-, A teate) | //b VY tex 2’ , i a ae : jan ae nh lies Mache 7 SLL (o7 4 FO / 23 & age I ELE ies ‘ x Azc< ch bo-r~ nade | 7 fF — Ca ie ¥6 ee Ce te | fee ¢ : epee a eP . — ingly, Erte, - J77 | _ Danie Of ko efho-— 337 Larnctlh 2M 237 - Aas AL Zo PLS | Damar [ll Caalts 3¢6,3 £P . p= ait RH anray, He NOt > SIF ys fl Gre le. Ke Se - FPF hAtsto, FiRene ‘ i —amnsitiies 4 ~ J )hex Y yf I Y “> n ata { ) 7 4 iN C a VAI, oS —westiiii KR LY A dtm Sr . Y29., f-¥G aay niall Nh (Bat @ p50 | ou MA ry 4 ee 4 7 pill TRiurdse, af pt ¢ a ‘ tf // lu q Q Ps i / j E {| 7 in | - i | ‘ i - M — i <i " ir | | i, - a 8 LB “a iy } ae i as 1 le a é | } + es ee mmen — 4 -+ } a = > 2 —~ Cake oe ae ae A ome Ute Bg é. a 2 ae ee _ Fly, wife iin ) : Ae. Bh Ke / ak OAK a. oe, é Hes , _- CKH2ete Ce me bLler, Banik 547 GL97 _ {to 27/39], SAD 332 331, 377 2 4 ) FIG, 32 AES SSS OTE, SS 7 & OKs 7 + v / $39 ~_ Sesperman, Seay £. 3 9.2? ins 25. : S¥ 7 ~ 4 pom annte es LY oF /6 / OE Fk a ae _ Atp Met on #15, {00 a | Kite gral 7 Alagh ? ee Sn Z y a ¢ 2 BS iii on E 11 Fo Ji é 3,/b¢, 23/,27¢ 3%, I2¢ Arrretl, (A Ropk ©, ITE 4.7 3 ( 4p), LR 7? Kke a Sa ee ae ae fy. /23 oe tetera. pele 7s Ahaningy, ee, aS eh AIS ‘ fae wre, Whecea_D Uf Feuke, Mu. Zyva yf - yas SFarntl C Arnie YO 'GrrvAc* . 4, aM | ws Sirk / y+ J ¢y 7 fi Fellbiapt, WTA aay F e, Cura IP 2u $33 ¥ a. 1 vi = why Bad Arh TOGA a = 1s7-S0l = Sire gat wea da ae a2. athe: \ BS ilklerX’ EX SI 4 | LL°fher Mbt 21. 64.5 MG Lilhs, Albee 73 Danie” acl YZ G5. - aA, ne J her € 4. ce IF Z| i/ bb? Ya ne Gr llr , lr oth J /3 i Hit: heen AcLoy ALect os an San i224... Joe Dirk Dury Kpoe pt See ‘ pi - S95 O- L7i. F724. ilies, 4 9 MDa Lei deities ills Zt L585 44H, KC 206, 207, 03 | eS ant, Ng Rew a9 ac eared as | = town § wate Zeer, [Jag 2 i ea 154, 26% 270.27 headache i 7 Cp. 247,263 / a ink, Bor.0.. a7, 40h = o+% | iid Me. me 4 |e FS fot bg pot ie, /4 37 a / Sp ittne, Wn eee C27, oS mee | B47. to Ts Aon “ 7. 2ee centile 7) CL peo, SAk + Ay c oO mee (PEA ht Caw Anewtigetdie FAS / yt 2 - a “4 AAthians, Y Kyi, Foe TLi+-» S “é . _ | 47 ULdcflasgy p< ik ar ses. i i=" ... y a ~<a H — 2 a fret es — aly. , AST & eT AR Garry Kaper, Lalo dt Ae ggg / AS fm 8 \\ — = Fie-gc, Mey +p Lex SZ —a < o. | 992. of 5 — j " YY SS eS L 4 ey ean LlOverhy Fa. iw 2 SED a Y lead oe e | gO 20.77 ants ~ se | . Man, arta OP 2 4 Be 7 a Sis { } ins F 7 1D 1S preven _ Hebleren- Te a ae lf (nylla~ ; ae = —— s3/ | eee a, il ill, Sty G3 : TD Haky: 2 ; : abe > tee, yd poe ACL a SO Aes FFI [1/0 iil OLKL Sitter Co, $57 — Lich Fra of S C6, p22 LB Wasa, brody ¢. eA 10 Lb AvitebOr , S J | Any, £, /C/7, {77 Ma . ) | Mz ; 4 Cae [7 | clean Wie and, JS. ¢ FO 2. Fos, FO C, PIS, A} a Palle be fond? C- 28% 227 A ZG | — Vhgree’, SOL Ff. : avy Lu Agfouew, Make ¢. Zz YF Reset, % wv. 38! — healittes Laarnligy Co 2f/ La eee % 2.7, | ieee , Ma a) ©? 406 a A Wurth, S562, ——. Wud, drora. du | Hi, Precbis Sun Tay le aps ASC, SFA, 64 Of a. eA FIM GFA, 40 Be, 237 ovk, ee bens AFeo CAny Ab 77, ede Laste ce ony rey Loe. Mi 2,674 J)b¥ azo PI, 70% 23? | es 4 ica b5,230 7 —~ Ke. 47a 1 149 L ) SX oa L “ara, pw op LE7 » Ma A a 0 grt ‘W1 it. ‘3 ZO Wohin, “f> el 22, ) senate, C (sade) 251 496, 897, 304, Soy, 3 Dreher, teks C ary? sists “66,267 26 2,6.74 /b& 230 14 F, J OF. 23? \77_, /65 ase ea Ps, a aknedv. ‘. Pp (hades) 27! att, 497, B09, Soy, 505 ~ [ Gadke.« YA J ee. as Jie“, ake Pe. . 266,267 26F i 7 lt2 | Ke i teal (" CL AD | 5 0A Va | a te H amen “Frc Be SB } i a. _ Ye < A 0 ke woh 75 7 bt ( Lay. i “a Dt ie ae = TA, f O -~ / - 4b ry’, atti igF My no ry a7 / / nyu. x), iaall <. 2 » yt 569k 46 ¥ pe . Gist Pi stl star / ecto _ Vet. Manes Se They Lp bor. Vi 4~C< BIS. b, jitther Gok” — FE ap 4g, $38 jl, Gea Hl, Epes tol (Weer, J] corigra, FIA, 57, 6273 flee fico 9 aes elec’ x ) fiekee Van ar | Adal Ly Ginn. &. SOL | = aoe a ttl lo. 12. ii | / GLkby / i | | ! : | J/a| | | i ake Kay V. pl¥ | | vn ah _—$ fi Io — i S\ opr -. ae : | > SH. ee By Wy 14 6149-64 oe VV aresd Ss, 2 624 x 14 e+ a: (faa — FF Now € AZ, 3) a 4a. 07 inne 33l, 33°, 377 AVI , ; i 47 pl Asset fo MtA-E LL; Ny. #of, 7 a, 64%3 | E C. Zz it a, FTF wa Kile, Bid, has [i prrked KISS 4 7p. S8F | ‘| fale, pth Gre Hi ose i aback WoraAL F. 5°07 add yarn $39, 673. Face. PR aMiicitnince S44 Aiphi, Joy len £45 7 Aap y A how 4 Ys hoy, Sour oe. $v “ ee Se SSE SS a apa ~— | bY) + —— + +~ + Mth, Recher? B24 74,/p 23 Tif rabbit, 2 Joh Orr. | 3 | : | ay Ve a. fp Lot \P ylF 016 2% [75,2 31,36, 309 505 Ht | nomiser, Jeb Te, 19 le mn druect—»§ ALK fy FO 19/03 7 JIA sah, $5 | i ' i i Mitre) Clekan/ fe ,74 76 Het Ha et) Ae Nitty, , pop ~ Ww, /// i |) ue 4 ; Fae tas a ee | ht ae ui! j, k \ ! ie bo BRE i Py Nee | BY Mara, EX, | ¥7 | NMaricrLlhe Alle 9s- a Mbrweer, (0 0 LFF | : ae WWhrtatle Cle JOA) F 4 Aagkow . = =" t et eG 235 2 1! Piller » Ak, A 36 a i | Nate, eastecclf 152 it ‘ “\ ; lhpbv rie Se acd ‘79). 2bf ) i Miu CS. 171,390 43) A | Aker te. Ll oe 256 | ve ) > 2 Snaevet? Litre, aan. 22% ..5°22..1 22 yt Monee, Ube AN, Sof, Bo ¥ 242 n a.) May AY sy - Mulls, uhy Whthiane Toes Pbtark b rhuk Plats, Wk Pt, Wel “, ‘% “ noe £ Whey c eae - Tha lex, Viblif i! Arf-h JU LQnr eae wt mgd “ Cite ry hao Tyfias, ‘ * a BF) | BY): Bo, HIn- F3% ZHAN - -9 3¥ ara s 5 Nie, yok we I¢°o7 gsr, A Ne 4, 534 5¥/ 54d “iy oon ci S73 Wills, > Sy _ fo] ose, Cherlin #- Ura Oncute GhaduAe Co Mirren, to yy Moy , S onrk Milks ek nies ath, ‘Dati eC te unth thot A F245 - SaS—7 Sto GSE he: mW 5+ fe Lage Modes! — ste Ws Ju, oe “ ME TAdiat-, mS _ pC W- i ME Coy, 6) eK / / ws VW A O~ ia e - aha J As Poin. _g2- . VL tee Ze WY “ ory Tlie ( op me thew i. -_ . ) 4 4 “e iS eg AL ry Ss S$ —s iu Zz FP>\, o § } GF a PF va i «“ — ees L175, BE ea? a 2 eo) ae -. | 2174 b+, aFo t Lew 1 Big tory. i Neth: u) Lh a. 102, v | Nak, Vi: Antue Gtararl tt), OP Daly Hote ip 7) ) any) pion LO a lp Za Mn: Retain Comegne, he 397. Sasser eeee — ——S>-- SSS SS =. =z eee ee SES tee | 2] “A, /o#t, AZ0 SAPS. foo | BAZ ° WwW CZ / % i Vals —— ile |e | 7 vem Gy. Kenlee ab. 1 deang Look) MS 140 2/4, PAC, BSG, + tH 276,996 356, 4.03 ari g fs st * AGG RIT, Joa, 309, 30% 5°o 5 of 34 BEF, Sl# 24 7 $42,8 S572 54 24, SST SYST 2a ae | \ i re | | S37 it ae, ia/7, PU eA) AeA. SYs- tie | he Ba | a / Zo. /@7 3 D744, RB Os Ses Y AehkesD V. fe, ¢3 / IP. fa ‘oe 233 AO ei 77 Ee 3p SW $O\7 oe V/_\7 2 224974 71. iv ste, Q palaiale, ie / F2F 36-5 235, 29634 SEH) Ko 2¢#l “24/ 27/ fuck» alone el. 274, Ronetd &. IN 1479, $82 e3/ Pale a c * Fz , Ab q ,, ,oue thas YyP7Z, ¢O/, +p S “ys 4, &/ * > 2 | OO Df ae pa : 4 . _ nae =1 Se. ] S ‘ Be: a -' : rae — ad te % : Se = — Se : 4 go Qatar ‘co ¥67 Hlatieks ermal 2, 93, )b¢, 224 Aerie Jah NM. LaLer, ae | LD Qa a Hales Bite Fhe /75,)7é isi dine FY, (07,230 Deh Veer i te Se Sev pele YoRB Bp hin 20g 104123, 277, 1, 37557 YL, 887 welt U he is ANgacenlt 167 OF Ghent, Kar’ Kay [Uf-/09 Mella lt ~e-o~ bey l SFA Fie el J 65. Fred. [bf ,176, 209, 5 fapig * Mar 2 AL, 4 Oo ee i 223 Dhue Ath — Lak, , 226 Lharmekre , 25), 4- 35g BOP, 3 AF Pen as O~ 7 235 BaiwA 279,240, 208, Fr a 25-6 — nay Bewwige abt St 244 Wega L, 12. 70. Mibaac be LaleshulSP-If 6, S¥¥ ae — Matec 277 tee ie 376 Mb 29Z2F 4, SOF SAL SY, 526 | Uacmeahe che fie zit “a ee Heh ewes eC 5g a | he M5 ak i al Lynithe, Pu. 6 I}, te A 4 Op 7). Foo,.4 357, y2E itd, lo. BS. 9 7/ dedi t Sue. (379 ifr, ELwer A 373, oped Kuz hice On sn Ib \hhiMesent Ce oa A Company 353-4, FAS Bort de 37,397 4s0, 594 ders Katpl i: 294 yoo, ie, 547 a Aa ¢o/, #3 heat, Wr KEL fx L0G. Lo. p27 Mlctacrtte gure Vseese, Al Qlalewile, oxtbieng (4p. $b 0 _ wm Fer 143 -S3F¥ ho. V ieee Ye. KX Hp | sia 4% L ely’, 551 os 7 (s yee — OED S// patna BNE SIL, S73 Y, iar gAr a cr brege vw ct yon Poth, rt ar EUS EV rae, ah ud. . S49 Pate Guhiam — $52 gy Tithe , athe Nara = 552 ., Wid - SSF - 559 Pork Nowali ©. 4s<S re WW, Weakl _ s7/ . ) jhe. Bartha -S89 Pomimine oF 4 Chia, SE 9 ms ) Wil. Satake. 597 iis Gon Bh | open itt | onl nde’ § Gs. 95 [6 7- 7/46. 23% sss Jol, OX foal oh HW, 83,462 239, a9b, 50h gk dnb //f i377 a (at gpak, 3 i a2 peas Decchace, [6F { ile 4 a, pS ly, / 7 Nagi! Llare J. |b 3-32,A33 2FPA, 507, Blo Karlticer/M 9 ¢/_ 273 Sayla, a. - a \Wrallmalely . te J is Meine Bi Heth wa RetgeS m att RAC L£6 Se 3 “Bb FAS FFL 379-F%2- jer iad he ye FES tty O Co lich, Q)datar, Ar _ iy > pater, CC | b Aieoenl tp Ha Ut Ahn sy S57/ er HN % Ape 7) y Jo. Lip- PS -5 79 A 7, 4 BO-SKE SP 24505 Ser SS 71S Se : a eS eee aaaige ag = Se ee = SS : Sains ee § Ste “3 Fie (= ee aaa) See oo A Tee eae el ree '¢ 126,/76,237 eB ggg wrt /b- EB Wit, Chih Sf 27 =e | Wane I. 7M £61967 7¢ Wada file Ctryppea | fii 9F dO SOA 17S 0 ATF BM /63)) o?, 433 Whabcussleaat-» Ff dygfhas '27 MW takie . Wiiaht FP BLI37, 277 Wthace. Vile g be taf, /F 2—“[Fb Unlhea,~e 1 Atccee (of Wad ph, arta C. Je) P 2424 YZ. Vp iM waite el Ligne ASLO, Sif he Sle E wr. (Keece Fee 72 : b ney, Diy Cc as »SLitww A Hf ZI SG 267 292_2.76,7F7 267 Aipjsoo , hh, 4 FA SIF, HE Fo 5 Aa. 506 Of LThra Praree F¥¢ | f | Wed has, 9 Sc 4 oe 17> ane 6 a | | | WRT Shit Braweg 376,134, LS se7 ih oat Gi>eanooe Bo p23 | | pee tm. \F22\, F7F i H | * Uasy ay ML Cat a a | Z22zy 402, £2/ fie ee, At. he, 4 7 + j r A oll | | Whanre, M Kae Pidignend $16 KLZ , a é i a D es v " tei pecneaeloceemeenesteliiremmas melons +— + = ie bony i { i i { y Lae { Hy | | aa ae: eae = ae. SSS a a ee a) A | ‘ ila. Be Aba ia Td oh if Ne SS Bt tiieets Visges ie Si Be WoMoce, Wrolu Bip 1419, $37, ss - ool | Weauer, tw S/F - Y) aus, aa me : a pa Wests 4 WRAL Yilae be — os Wrode | mek a mer] > hi klipe ee tao 3 sad SFL, $9 4 : ay i tn Aes i aay i ad My 4 iF aE i WB, it Hy ti} Hi A =: | | > = Snemeinsslegow one mene a ee = sa - . ~ me eR A A CC A LLC A LOCO A A A en ee a emnsneigsnr-cis sale taenerhg NEDA ms - a ae on ee < Se oi ea SESE oe — ae Se ene ee ¥ = r scsi celestial ats Pi 2 ss % Sure = a as era : Ss * pee mace ween Te cS ee a ao at eS Se a eg aes : So a aa a _ — - = - a sos = Sr ne = —— -— — ————— ieee seen eeremanns a er SRS SS aa IEE PTOI EN ESBS ON SLE =i 7 “ Ae ein 4 1 - ~ —— : — = ~ x = se os 4S Sr SS SSE Ss aa : =o = = - a er s - _ . eee ‘ re 7 . 5 : ER Sane A ac Tek fosscr si 3 i 5 - ie fs. vt \ eee IN THE SUPERTOR COURT PIRST WHEK o-- JANUARY Thith, 1950 bionday, January 30th, 1950 NORTH AKULINA, DELL COUNTY. e {t remembered that a Superior Court bejvun and eld in } ‘ > f° ometr ' . : . ana ; 4 “ ,') ‘ the County and ‘tate alore! nid at the Courthouse in Statesville, Nh. the 30th day of January, 1950, at 10:00 Ofelock A. M. when and where His she , HLldam Hy Robbitt, Judyre res ane ali | ilol Ling Our! of’ the | titeenth jatrict, '} ring Teri, 1950, Lz pre ant ind presidi Li's and honor ity ee John eLaughlin, olicitor and Prosecutin ttorney for the Mafteenth Judie: i ana ay f North ‘rarolinn, ip present and prosecutliy: nm Gl ane of the 0 orrison, Heh Sheriff of Jlredell County, the Goulbe jorrison, Hirh Sheriff of Jredell County, returns into °@ de fhe names of the following rood and lawful men to serve as jurors lor the January ‘ort 950 rst \.eek toewlt: and for { mand Jury to serve for 1, pix montas er i My ’ ’ d period eh 1950, toewlt: red ve Gberthane } ‘hk hedd | ¥ Morrow eConnell 4 83 Virgint rady medunkin ylarke hoy ) Christopher Trivette wrence | ason Hubert i. Hinson 2 C Prown, JY. se Grose b iy Kamsey ing, llueh K Guy ‘gworblh mitten Jordan itankin lloyd WwW Wilson Hoyt burdock Y Jettie Brown ‘inude KR Veal sa We wOPropyt 3 J kenegar Me Fe hioore , lt is ordered that the action by the oard * Gounbty ‘onmisuioners in rawing 42 names from the jury box to serve for the first week of t iis term of juner ~v . 7 Y perior ,ourt he ap roved and afl Lrmed, The following yood and lawful men were duly drawn and sworn As the Grand Yury to serve for the six months period ending June 30th, 1950, to-wit: lubert F. Hinson Hugh Ke Guy B. D. Walters ru. T., We. Carlisle F, Moore Roy D. Christopher K. D, Green CG, heConnell J. T. Steele "red We Henkel We. C. Grose lH. 5. Morrow We. Wilson Claude kh. Deal Li as ©e C, Jwown , Jr. ‘es Ee Ramee Ne N. Seroge W. Clarence Kamsey y Mi. Ee Ramsey, was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. ve We. Woodward, was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jurye ——SS SS = Sibi Beata ai cae a ———— i } i ta | o_ q ‘i a iss Virginia Brady + . rrancis robert to R. Le Reavis and i. NO. 717 otate vs Robert Watts No. 725 otate VS T L Nixon No. 740 otate VS manual Sauoemaxer No. Y4O state vs Jonn Henry oum..rs Noe 942 tate VS Onie L Nicholson Ve 53 tate Vv Johy OL-Aa i No. 954 State VS Ric) rd G ae I de WY Jtate vs Joe Johnson No. lOS4 tate Vs Eddie Joines No. 1103 tate vs Guy Ramsey IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SIRST WEEK--- JANUARY TERM,1950 Monday, January 30th, 1950 was out of the County N. moore and iurs. CO. V. Henkel, or. were excused by the Court fuiddlesworth and “rs. Jettie Brown were excused by Statute le arKe —_——<— — eee ee A a —— a a he ee —— a oe eet V. Floyd were not returned was excused on Doctor's Certificate . m NOUWeOUFE Ort sane ‘- ,nAe Alias Vaplas : are 2 WtUL ’ sa sap1as ew + VW ontinueda nder former oraer . v Lista, Wi 4 I 1 ’ or 111aS Vaplas “U 13 . 1LLAaS g ontinu l ri rr order 1 ’ « \ api 7 ‘ * J 1 ve L Su 7 mn moUrrUnL Jontinued under former order The defendant called : . Pe fendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi 2¢1 fa ane a No. 1163 State vs James R Harris No. 1167 State vs Waddell Sawyer No. 1165 State vs Willie W Janes No.1205 State vs FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM Nathan Patterson flo, 1221 { State vs Troy Bb Fesperman { No. 1290 { State vs George Lee Conner ota ve vs Lee F,. Blevins No. 1175 State vs John A, Josey Wo. 1211 otate vs Conrad &, Redman No. 1222 state Vs Billy Rankin No.1254 State vs James Foote No. 1261 | State vs B. NN. Freeze No. 1266 i vtate vs John Wm hassey . No. 130 Stata” Ny Vs James C Icenhour IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1950 Monday, January 30th, 1950 LARCENY Continued under former order POSSESSING LIQUOR Alias Sapias BURGLARY Continued under former order BASTARDY Contimued under former order RSCKLESS DRIVING The Defendant called and failed. Instanter Capias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WiSAPON Capias DSADLY WEAPON defendant ’ TT mm TT AQDOJAULL Wa dil Continued for the ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued by consent APaat a POSSEooLN! ioe ‘ ae 7 oJ » - The defendant and Capia Judgment Nisi Sci Fa upon his giving a new Bond in \WURDER Continued by consent DRIVING DRUNK The defendant called and failed. and Capias. x Upon arrest release only upon his giving a new Bond in the sum of 3400.00 Judgment Nisi Sci Fa ABANDONMENT AND NON-SUPPORT Nol Prossed SPEEDING Continued by consent Judgwent Nisi Sei Fa and _ eee ial No. 1307 State vs Cyrus C Johnston, } No. 130% ob ate vs NW. We Webster i NO, 1315 State vs - Veil Fox at o7) ' 208 & iz 5 } f | naé aa . oe *State ea ! Clifford Bellany Vesa - Charles w. Brown y ae , No. l om tate Vs David ose i Co , ie 4 13( etat Vs Javid Rosebor - peg - —_ ce eve p pera m ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK = JANUARY TERM,1950 Monday, January 30th, 1950 JRIVING URUNK Continued by consent EiABEZZLELENT Continued for the State , A PHN EMertar TAO Pil dN The defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi and Capias. Upon arrest release only upon his giving a new 3ond in tne sum of 3500.0 ci Fa NO OPSFRATORIS TT 1S) NO OPiinhalladto LIiGhhos The defendant enters a plea of guilty to not having a driver. license and todriving a motor vehicle on the public highways — while unier the influence of intoxcants. The two cases are consolidated for the purposes of judsment. Tne judgment of the Court is that the defendant Siw y > a r . LUJ and pay the cost, wre Nain JNA V LING JRUNK pay a Fine of } and that the defendant be confined in t: common jail of 4+rédell County for a period of NINETY DAYS an assimned to work under the supervision of the State Highway a ublic \.orks Commission. The road sentence is suspended upon 4 conditions: 7 hat + Pan - y ; o Ps ann ete - +144 4. inat tne aelendaant pay the fine and costs at this tern, Mot t ief an* anara* ‘ 4 . dow 5 ane *e inet tne aelenaant not operate any motor veunicle on any } lie Awl: ee } ’ 14 - a i. mA * } ’ tr tener udlic highway of North Carolina fox period of TucLVi MONTES we eae +he late o , : we «s . 4 a rp + Li Vi Vine Uc © ot tne A ewosal Vs visi O OULU, , 4 ~ 4 eS . . aod tet od Posh hn 4 : ho v 1 1 COniltment to issue witnout further order in the event the fine and cats e not paid in full at this tern, othe ise only upon motion of the Solicitor and Superior Court Jug en presidir t any time within TwELVE MONTHS from the date ¢ the risi of this court upon tisfactory proof to such Super: vourt Judge that tue defendant has violated in whole or in pat ny of the conditions uo! ich the road sentence is suspended, ine defendant in open court throuch his counsel WwW. &. Battle, ttorney enter: ico of cuiltv of Speeding, to-wit, driving ce f 46 a ims a ae ; ; in re Ol 3D) Wiles er nour in residential section in Oiatvion of the i.otor Vehicle Act. rrayer tov jwgnent continued upon the payment of the cost i 4) P } } this action, aku d3 I , . 4 e dafea n, virourn nls Atterney, ir. Je Ge Lewis se Gesendant enters « plea of cuiity,’as charged. ~ Payer tor juagment continued unon payment of the costs. dibsaatol Uist wei i i J G r nr oLST NG ARREST q 71%, Sit Brarced. rt me ace throuz The defendant’ She Rs4 ne purposes of judgment. , I ; cases are consol 4€ judcment of tue ir c O ’ he os a a pane 0! 50. of eee vourt is that the defendant pay a fine © a." oe - And pay Une COSst na t iat he be confined in the coms ed 3 { wha P : } . - ra } oie. voi OL tredeil County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS and assig eke Gane Supervision of the state Highway and Aeregt Open 0 7 vesone ~y and with the consent of the defendant + pouyvCurt, the road sentence is suspended for the period 0 tewutO Upon the following conditions: dvi ~;. that the defendant pay in full the fine of 3250.90 and costs of these actions, ée That he be of rood behavi : f the criminal laws of thees d behavior and not violate any ol. of two years from ¢} ne state of North Carolina for the period o ta rom the date of the rising of this court. oun ge Commitment to issue without further order in the u¢ tine and costs are not paid in full at this term, otherwise onl i oli Judre th - y oo motion of the Solicitor, and the Superior ud vwlen presiding aa’ aa Pre at any time wit! rel ths the d:; : time within twelve (12) mon date of the rising of this court upon catnebaneeel proo to such Superior Court J ‘ a 2 u Judge tl ated wiole or in part any of th mii isns ceo onseh eae tence is Suspended, frou . fr € conditions upon which the road % No . 13 UP state rs vs Jimmie O Stark ~ No. 1310 State vs Sherman No. 131) State vs John H Gant No. 1312 State vs sharles £ No. 1314 State vs 3entlev Ray 7 No. 1315 State vs Neil Fox lo. 13 1 O “tate vs reorgee F Ho No, 1213 State Vs Reid Kenney W=32 No. 1310 State vs Sherman P. H 0-26 Allison a fine of Hart Beam,dr. rr 3 4and IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --=- JANUARY TERM,1950 eee Monday, January 30th,1950 Wh ILLEGAL OPERATION OF SLOT ACHING =. i we | The defendant emmoneta Ure sttpraeyyi, ® Battley We The judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay 5250.00 and the cost of this action, and that he be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of NINUTY DAYS assigned to work under the super- vision of the State Highway and Public Works Comuission. The road sentence is suspended on condition that the defendant pay the fine and costs at tnis term of court. Capias and commitment to put the road sentence into effect without further order in event the fine and costs are not paid in full at this term. It is ordered that the slot machine offered in evidence be confiscated and destroyed by the High sheriff of Iredell County. j SREAKING, ENTERING AND LakCuNY ) A True Bill | BREAKING, eNTERING aND LARCshY si] | A True Bill ao ae tie t a i Heat BA th Bia it i 4 2D LuThh NT ODT. ?? lanry > (i fl ‘ au sta ddviry ass i SIVAN 3 shii based dale (ft ; Rl A True Bill ' tha § Ms) ee Hi tf} eh i Hata 14s | iH peat . 9 ym Tmt a. v mn? ih } Oe 4 } ASSAULT adh JGAVLI WIArON | Mh} ih A True Bill i} {r ae I" 4) > th ) it 4 fi . +) rat hae OA sae land Ni i Hi i it if G2 eS ——_—.. BREAKING & ENTERIN } A irue bilii i; af - J Ane Wath FALSE PRETENSE ie A True Bill ita : a fr AmAwmOUN | LARC NY | 4 A True Bill i { } NON-SUPPORT = The defendant through his Attorney, Ir. W. R. Battley enters a plea of NOT GUILTY. ; Jury swrn and empanelied: 7. K. weid, J. C. Williams, Chas L Gaither, Hoyt Murdock, F. A. Medunkin, we C.Trivette, J. Be Renegar, F. F. King, A.E. Byers, B. . crown, Lawrence Mason and Ww. B. Jordan. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of guilty of Kkeceiving Stolen Property. i | Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jajl of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS. By and with consent and requedt of the defendant, it is ordered’that the sentence hereby imposed be served in the common jail of Iredell County under the supervis- ion of the jailer and the toard of commissioners of Iredell County. 1 THE SUPERIOR, COURT 6 IRS? WEEK =-- JANUARY TERM,1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- WANUARY TERM,1950 YF Tuesdzy,January 31st, 1950 Monday, January 30th,1950 : fi No. 1309 j SREaALING, SNTERING AND LARCENY | State [ : The defendant in open court enters 2 plea of guilty of bn i : i . Jimuie O Stark { ing and entering with intent to commit a felony in the Nive BL C-60 | count and larceny in the second count. — a \ : The two counts are consolidated for the purposes of jude: This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Pe Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined : ; ! Comnon Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTEEN hyp: Yorning, January 31st, 1950. | hy 1 and assigned to work under the supervision of the State i. /m aa) wey and Public Works Commission. 7 WE 3 | No. 1316 ee a : : ' : j ASSAULT WITH Di@ADLY WEAPON ie he defendayt in open Court, through his couns Nei o, 1312 oS ae ; als A ovane ’ ite a: 1. i. ansaee 4 lea of m nsel, Heil : we t i The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be i Hb Ms Sowers and I. 7. Avery, enters a piea OL nolo contendere t State as ; , 7 + a . : ) . oe ie ae fuliy taking of +4 1 confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period i TE Georce F. Holland the charce of unlawfully taking of a motor vehicle with vs : MOTTE MONTUG : i. Ai uBorge #. Hotta pane ‘jc ta aol th a sa B : charles E licLelland of TWELVE MONTHS assigned to work under tne Supervision HY W-17 intent to temporarily deprive the owner ol tue possession 7% vnar wes f the 3te Hi chw a Public Works Commieei This i hay - thereof, in violetion of Section 20-105 of the G : of the state Highway and Public Works Vommission. 4415 ti a“ he » ah VE 1 I ne i ne General Staty aes F ; . : Pes Aaa of North Caroli Fish cotta an Pets : al road sentence is suspended upon the following conaitions: ia & ‘ of North Carolina, first waiving any requil! ement with refer. : 5 : H Ali y Lae ka tha f iedles of 6 Oe 11 of indictmen ge ee 1. That the defendant pay the costs of this action in ini ihe ence to the finding of a true bi of indictment, which ple i os if | is accepted by the State. : “es full av pg ae iain cei tee ae t Wf | 7) ca . 2 the 0 : <P , , Re a ndant pa I rk his Cou i The judgment af the Court is that the defendant be confinii or om a a oo 1550 ie = - 133035. Court ” tf in the comuon jail of Iredell County for a period of EIchT i 7 eee ee ee ee SUE OS Sho7ere, WT yal ae cute and aseiened to work und al . amount shall be disbursed by the Clerk in payment ol the iat ae UNiIHO an assicnea vO Wor k under the Supervision of the Sti hy spital and D ne bills oe d : t t t f J M | Ht laehway and Public “orks Commission. } — and Doctor bills incurred in treatment 0 ean ain ; It appearing to the Court that the defendant is now 17 yz 7", , , 1 e , n 1 6 . ‘it of are and that fie has not previ ly serv iow 17 yea 3. That the defendant shall pay to tne Clerk of this If f age and that .e Aas nov p iously served a sentence or - a ed = bic + , entences of total of more than six m ‘ > 4 Court on or before the first day of the January term 1951 a. || ~f se ices of ta fu han six months, it is furthr @ ; gle ae : oe 4, ig ¢ e | y ordered that the defendant shall be segregated by the State i the sum of 200.00, which amount shall be held by the Clerk t ) ee ee ate te eee eee gregated A at nie Gow tole th teu & h a ae Slide Me Nichway and Public works Comission, as provided for yountiy of cass Cours 25 8 cordance with law for the use am bene aE a offenders. fit of Jean Connor. eit: e i 4. That the defendant shall not violate any of the eh . . ~ , YT nn . 7 > . , } \ ‘ Criminal laws of the state of North Carolina for the perioa A Be loe 1312 J ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON of TWO YEARS from the date of the rising of this court. SUG: BATE state \ The defendant in open court, through his counsel, W. 2 % Capias and Commitment to issue withqut further order, in |. Ii Rie ia ai . oe oo , elle Ahlen age, Tibi Be } r he Skus—and S ps apeye 347% t paldiat tim@aee vi |} enters a plea of nolo contendere to the charge of assault i the event the costs fare ot Sect in furt dthie ©") ald a a Chas. &. i.cuellan | Deadly \eapon, which plea bs accepted by the State. term, otherwise only upon motion of the Solicitor and > Re) ae ' Cm5: : : Superior Court Juige then presiding at any time within > MEE BE twelve months from the date of the rising of this court = We De . c upon satisfactory proof to such Superior Court Judge that 3 i i! al | No. 131k DAV TRA At roan trae the defendant has violated in whole or in part any of tle 5 a ‘a vtate Sane ay Seon conditions upon wiich the road sentence is suspended. a ta: | VS i The defendant in open court through his counsel, R. A.tet ‘ nif entley ‘tay Beam,dre | enters a plea of cuilty on each of the counts in the billa os , , i) -19 { indictment. ; No. 1314 | BREALING AND ENTERING : aR State { The two counts are consolidated for the purpose ol Yi O l ’ 3] i vs juspment.. s | M "Shake . ; ae Bentley Raf Beam,Jdr. The judgment of tie Court is that the defendant be con- ft ‘ a vontinued fined in the comuon jail of Iredell County for a period of : uke Davis BIGHTEEN MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of abil ee ‘ the state Highway and Public Works Commission. 4ne road si ; sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: No. 32 ) FORFIETURE OF 30ND 1. That the defendant pay the costs of this action in i - PIRIUAS vi JN ; fe ; kea State '. eeneenion full at this tern. ee | us ) arrested pce ge oe Court that the defendant has been 2. That the defendant not violate any of the criminal Lee F. Blivens ) at this term oe oe under a rew bond for his appearende laws of the State of North Carolina for a period of Two WT Tt te cedaved a a YEARS from the date of the rising of this court. } sauna - ae ee the judgment absoulte on the pond » Capias and commitment to issue wi bhout further order in eost of the Sei we se, be discharged upon payment of the the event the fanecand costs arenot paid in full at this re term, otherwise only upon motion of the Solicitor ana No. 990 0 COST AND FINE Superior Court Judge then presiding at any time within State 0 It ar pearing to the ¢ TWELVE MONTHS from the date of the rising of this court vs ) into the office of th 7. that the defendant has paid upon satisfactory proof to such Superior Court Judge that Joe Johnson Q $215.00 to appl on thi erk of this Court the sum of the defendant has violated in whole or in part any of the It is nena that : “t conditions upon which the road sentence is suspended. of the oun pal in bc. tune ance ft keke Ge o— cab Wea mene n to take care of the cost and fine and th nce be pro rated to the parties setout in e original judgment entered at the May Term 197. It appearing that there are not sufficient number of regular jurors pre~ sent to conduct the business of the court satisfactorily, it is ordered that the i ; 4 Mtoe tf iu box ae " : } 4 } inis honorable Court takes Jury boxes of Iredell County be brought into the court room forthwith, that 4 w ake a an ‘ Vv y e rou net , baie S a recess until Tuesday Morning, January 31st: iis ‘ f Qe } Oter 1 ni m s2a8 : r 950 at 9:30 O'clock, d under ten years of age draw therefrom the names of additional jurors, 20 in : F ‘i a ' number, to be summoned for jury service commencing at 2 O'clock, P. M., on this oe ‘ : r Tuesday, the 31st day of Jan, 1950; that the sheriff shall eummon such juors Y ’ ; S80 drawn forthwith. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 8 FIRST WEEK -- JANUARY TERM 1950 Tuesday, January 31st,1950 No, 1324 ofate vs robert R. Redmon > —— >< bee 3 2 4 o 4 tg be ht to No. 1319 MANSLAUGHTER | State . True Bill vs x HUbert Kay holleman See nT MAUTP YD adv Ole UU 2 ill a True Bill No. 1319 aA otate Vs a a ee » ’ , ° * : Hubert Ray Holleman ad Ne 1290.) TER HO« 2 320,45: Uen Ww duets IUAYU UT ail : ¢ Veen e } A at te i 32<UeND srue dn de he vs | Janes Wi Brovm i + ; , ios 1317 154 iy tate irue owe 4 G ‘ VS i ‘ A e J Javis y i” + @ ~~) i> | + aAta i y , ’ wet } . Vt ave { eu I I 1 nm WOU we ase opoay \(el1cnaveen . + \ i C ] iru 1J inuictment reing tne derendant ' . 77 ; ‘ ) 1? c > a y y ~ ¥ Flake i.ullis | e julli t capital of se of Rape in wor 1 figu 4, ~~ ’ ’ ’ ’ QT’ : ry , m bika i wii ~ LLY ded dds WL ee ~ ww Usald rr rn —— JaNURARY TERI. 1950 s : ; : a = rs i (esta Bum 4 ey bi bili de ide Patoiaed | snat flake 1 i t » the C + f _% +} c vw ¥ rembe iy “ Vii uv v. i arecelil, on tne 9 ay ol iLovember, ree: . — = . cr ' a - af . de ’ U ce na rms © and in tne ,OUNTY iloresait, ’ it LleLoniously d commit an assault on x J ulli 9 i ner the said i..ary emily ioe ame Veid L e " + ‘ y norr : CC ald aPulno v or Will, io Ss iSi na Calu ’ ; ea . . . ne ‘s 4ilou & »OL Jae ou sUveE in icn C e Lae a pro 7 de A ai v vii f wv € a LUY i t! e te te. John R&R. iicLaughlin ~ Tiattas YWOLILC1LUOr. Oe 1364 LAL VO eis ] 14 fe Lace lullis 4 ina Tomo a AI ae OUIN GS ~ kaPys —_—_———_ Witness is ; uw aT eee Mary sraily Mullis Ue ~*« Mullis duth Mullis urs. sate liullis ee ee ee Tose marked x sworn by the un- a ned foreman, and examined before tne Gran 17" ¢ j 5 . © “rand Jury, and this bill found. : : a TRU 4 BILL } I » {amsey + ", . . o. foreman of the Grand Jury. No. 1313 State vs Floyd Steele IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM,1950 9 Tuesday, January 31st, 1950 | BURGLARY. The Grand Jury returns in open court, in a body (eighteen present) a True Bill of Indictment charging the defendant cae Floyd steele with the capital offense of Burglary” in words THEE and figures as follows: i | ¥ wT " _ (\T™ Nf \y Ty al 7 Oe Pat V7TT 7 T \ f ' { "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT TOPNETI nmr MIT Myr om ALA @ | IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY Tanti. ,1950 i 1] mrt TTT ’ .\t #6 MAMI TTTOCWKY "RIL TH mrr TM. Mae . a! £0 JURVItS PUM <d2c1% O4A420 VIVN snobs ATH: PRESENT: That ‘uae i Floyd Steele late of the County of Iredell January, Ai. D. 1950, about the hour of twelve in the night of ; } | : } n the Sth day of ; Hal a the same day, with force am arms, at and in the county afore- i 1 eter reid a i r, with intent, a A T said, the dwelling house of one Van l.eter iieid tiere situate, the goods and chattels of the said Van ..eter in the said i and then and there actually occupied by one Vai feloniously and burglariously did break and @ dwelling house then and tuere being, then an here feloniously and burglariously to steal, take and carry away, contrary to the form of the statute in sucn case made ana provided and against the peace and dignity of the State. Wt » O&O ct ec ae ; ' Nie 4 T 112 i. WE: yO! nos ChOAUSNIAM. a i | | 20OLLCLUOr.e aan | " Nos 43 . a NOe t)949 we Ph : wd ida ha v3 wet i Floyd steele Hh it tBLaT GR ae Wits fies + iy Bel ea coma - TT “8 ¢ as 4) 1 + Ji de gaed if a i : yy " a hie) w Ads bsba iy : . By ’ i Le Mee ncaa i ae Tt. ere | fan Meter Reid i ‘a — sa —---- - Ht Those marked a Sworn oy tne uncere ae : : ; ~ *° . t ih i } sia7-nea 1orem ily ATi examined oeLiore tne ide } PS mena 3 anal ehtiea 411 fats ited srana veury, ind V.llié 92 LOUTIU ; sae. Sy 4 » Ba a ae Wi ) ou i ; ww Ab a hy H . c - ” + ' ’ Ta. oy , Foreman oi tne urana vury | By | ons gr oe ae BURGLARY Grand Juvy returns in open court, in ‘esent) a True Bill of Inaictment charging tne defendant . oyd steele with the capital offense of Burglary in worus a S & ‘ -_ ps ct o ———<— 3 > > @o C q > . ficures as follows: rap im ps eer rr? ] TOR AoMnT ' "Shalt UL wUalda viitubiaa OU Pind VUUItSd ' - ’ ee Antinicry yer Dy Mm OLN ditiyl ty dal COUNTY Url .aal Tom.,1950 | nti ft 1s <aes ame ome . ; we . Mh. M1. « | THE JURORS *OR THE Stadia UrON bibla UAdn Pillbobnd. That F 11 Yaqin ~y ho inw >t \- ° Floyd Steele late of Iredell County, on the © day a vanu cy, t A. D. 1950, about the hour of twelve in the night of the sane vy. with force and arms, at and in the county aforecaia,the Lay ’ iwelling house of one Van lieter Reid there situate, and then and there actually occupied by one Van }.eter neid Peloniously and burglariously did break and enter, with intent to commit a felonious assault on one Van lieter Reid in the said dwelling house then and there being, then and there feloniously and is burglariously with intent to feloniously assault Van leter .ecld, contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and pro- vided and against the peace and dignity of the State. John R McLaughlin Solicitor "No. 1313<A STATS VS Floyd steele INDIO TMaNT DURATARY oa ted BA Witness Van Meter Reid Those marked & sworn by the under- signed foreman, and examined before the a this bill THUR BILL Grand Jury, a found A s e Gran seins tee EEL oreman, o No .1323 State vs Lula kh. Carpenter -- Robert it Redm: ~ NO. Ae rh State Billy Leazor No. 1301 State Jerry # Byer: #19 “ —— <a ———— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ** JANUARY TERM,1950 Tuesday, January 31, 1950’ MURDER fhe Grand Jury returns in open vourt in a body (eighteen p, a True Bill of Indictment charging the defendant Lula M. cj." with the capital offense of Murder in words and figures a follows: . Carnee as +m 1 4 "tT AADAITM "WSTATS OF hatin CAROLINA Je oe 7. ERIOR COURT InDSLbL YUUNLIL JANUARY T ail, 195¢ Tig JURORS FOR —5 STaTS UPON THSIR OATH PROSENT: That Lula M. Carpenter 1 ate of the County of Iredell, on the 4 Gey of September, A. ¥. 1949 with force and arms, at and in the said Jounty, unlawfully, willfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforetnouzht, did kill and murder one R. oO, Carpenter contra ‘ry to the form of the statute in such case made and py, vided, and against the peace and dignity of the State, John 2 licLaurhli goon Menaul | Solicitor , , ‘ oe ae 2 ae 24h its VS. ula M,. Carventer PR tT ee LNULO Nd it Ji a wunes 2 jue LUC r , essie itucker % nl 2UVe cucKker - «o He ufon C TOSS Tae heL SWORN DY the ae. _4nose imarxed x sworn by the under- csi cna » al 5 “ram } 7 } Signed, iorenan, and examined before the iv” nd uUurv . ) +’ 4 - } i | + rand Jury, and this bill found RUE BIL ‘te cf . /e ee foreman of the Grand Jury. + 40 Th lefe ; LVNPov ian ih VUO »c CLley ‘awl So ‘re 5 of nate" ullty, ad iry sworn and empanelled caiark ere ef onoF | ¥ close tate's evidence, the defer t throu 7 eo soaagpsey: DekK tk jedeies move for Judgment cs of won=Juit . .Ott0n rOWED » i a LUL wi TH Jia LY T} DA ON sne a-lendant enters a plea of not Y. “rT 1 ~ pee vury sworn and empanelled,. lal ’ ws Mabey Ld oak 1D NON@=SUPPORT Upon m ; . as : — of the state and vy and with the consent of conn for the v. t ivate prosecution and of counsel for the defendant, * cause is remand conside nded to +] ie recorder? s Court of Mooresville for fur consider: ‘tion and disposition. ALVING DRUNK The d nc } throuict ‘ & . . - io] : _ The efendant through HiS attorneys Messrs Lewis and Hedrick Civers plea OL not uilty : not guilty. , sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of NOT Gls" vury IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM ae” Tuesday, January 3lst, 1950 GRAND JURY REP ORT= JANUARY TERI 50 IREDELL COUNTY SUPERIOR ae The Grand Jury passed on all bills that were presented by the solicitor true bills in all cases. and found Committees were appointed to inspect the following county »roperties: COUNTY JAIL A committee with hr. H. S. liorrow as Chairman, inspected the County Jail and found a total of 16 prisoners, 10 white wales, 5 colored males and l colored female. They found the quarters clean and orderly and the prisoners . af + flac hae Smerallar . eh as satisfactory. A new Gas Stove has been installed in the report tne food as kitchen, which was a recomuendation of the previous Grand Jury, and is in sood working condition. A committee with Mrs. T. \.. Carlisle as Chairman, inspected tie County Home and found a total of 52 inmates, 17 white females, and 23 white males, $ gored females and 4 colored males. This committee reports everything around clean and report “ the home in excellant condition, all the bed ard bed patient that they are being well cared for. They made a thorough inspection of the kitehen at a time when the noon meal was being prepared and report the kitchen in cood clean condition and the food apweared appetitizing. This committee wishes to comuend l.rs. Sherrill on good housekeeping and good attention to the Cc inmates. SOURT mvUoL The Grand Jury recommends that tne tile floor in the room under the floor that is now under the a Register of Deeds Office be replaced with similar — $s 9 hazard ina 7 ALA aS * “ vlerk of Court Office, this tile has core loose in several place: They also recommend that the walls and ceiling in this room and t..e room under the Clerk's Office bepainted. Otherwise we find the Court House in satisfactory condition. PRISON CaP Je did not make a inspection of this institution at this time, but will do so at the May Term of Court. Respectively submitted, _ _ Ramsey dal Ramsey, Foreman n a Hl Ht q i) (BE Hitt ie uy } i I) } | i eh: iT Ht y BEY "i iy es aE H tb TH if i iF | SBE ¢ Aa | { i WEN) SEY 1 Hi wa! | | iF 1 Hi } | it i i it } Pe i id AE iba tt iy ’ v F ae it : ties 1 et ee fa ah BS i ae i unt i el hate i i tial i . ahi i A ' Ps ft 4 ; Woe I 1 r i : 1 } iy ' IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 12 FIRST WEEK == JANUARY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, January 31st,1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ' FIRST WEEK «-- JANUARY TERM,1950 13 ' Wednesday, February lst, 145 0 wh MURDER a aN i No. 1325 | ‘ rap te { The Grand Jury returns in ope . nag 4 in a body (eighteen pres ent 4 Te “ $1) j tment harg - the defendant sinn | ae Ne . i a . VS a True Bill of Indictment ¢ = ie Brow, 4: This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on | tne n . . sme AAD TIN SUPERIOR COURT i Wednesday Liorning , ec \ Todas VP WY Roa UA Jobaveds Yo ry Ji NU ary TERM 950 ) s y mu » 4950 i, ryt wWOQ ;* r / nt 1 i OR Tis STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: That Sinnj i as i ugue . RSET: Hat Sinnie No. 1324 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WisAPON NOe se” . . " » ie Dy 1 c S " ; ‘ i Sinnie Brow apital offense of l.urder in ag Pee oy and figures as Tfollows; f it February lst, 1950. Lut JU JRORS eUit 463 _> ,1 iu , Brown late of the Coun ty of tredell, on the 22 day af January Ce ata The 4 “Nec 3 ¢ ai 3 moo mer I De 1950, with force | and arm iS, at and in the said Vount) wi: otave sne jury returned a verdict of NOT GUILTY h As fully, feloniously, and of his malice aforethought, did itt ani Ros eee murder one Dora lioore Holly contrary to the form of the Statute dobert # nedma ay in such case made and provided, and age inst the peace am dignity i ' AN He af the State. & Bae AOR AWRY ae aREh i ee John R. McLaughlin No. 13ce , tit i | i ’ Satta io State | Ine de oe ant in open court through his -ounsel, Noel \oodhouse iy HB J vs ' HSQ es V ives finding of a true bill of indictuent, and tenders dl hee ‘No. 1325 Philli; Salino # a plea of guilty of issuing a worthless check in violation of ri Tit SAT in 23 Section 14-107 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, wiich [RRImRy By . nt plea 18 accepted yy the otate. ae aenta Saean It is judgment of the court that the defendant be confined in ii HRY - . tie common jail of Iredell County for a period of THIkTY DAYS Kt ait to be assigned to work under the supervision of the otate liche- i way and Public works Comnission. +) 1 “d rere nh co No. 13 . va a - UE ; state The defendant in open court througn Ais counsel, Noel a : cn ccvsenthiiaiiiipasamamamennnciiaes inant vs woodhouse, Lsq., “aives finding of a true bill of indict- tie itness hillip salino | ment, and tenders a plea of guilty of issuing a worthless check a aS in violation of Section 14-107 of tue General Statutes of wh 3 rman ynhuford North Ca rolina, which plea is accepted by the otave. uh yack uynei It is judgment of the court that the defendant be confined iy y .ou syne. in the common jail of Iredeil County for a eriod of THIRTY a MB byce wOOUS ene to be essigned to work under tae supervi sion of the ih: Paul Redmon State Highway and Public \.orks Comaission. [nis sentence ey JOS SUCKSE is te comience at tie expiration of the sentencerin iio.l32o. ae a aie Lroun int 4) ah Lt L t oore Wy ‘4 y ; . No. 1330 oe IRGURY ie Hi Those marked 4 Sworn by bie UNCOr= State | The defendant in open court through his counsel, hoel i AGhee — nm, and e2 mined before tue vs | Woodhouse, sc., aives finding of a true bill of indict- ye dt Pan I ha Dats found. Phillip Salino | ment, and tenders plea of guilty of issuing a worthless check [ize ol we 3 in violation of Section 14-107 of the Generai Statutes of By 1 sD BAe North Carolina, which plea is iccepted by the wvtate. eh ek ; os _ It is judgment of tne court that the defendant be confined q nen OF abe Geant os in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of Risks: i + J POLCicdil UL Us ; - —s Vaio to ve assigned to worl under the supervision of tne otate iy Highway and fublic Works Commission. This sentence is t } commence at tle expiration of the sentence in No. 1329. No. 133) J SORGSRY tate } The defendant in open court through wis counsel, iioed Bh | VS doodhouse, L&qe, waives finding of a true bill of indict-= a Hillip salino ment, and tenders a plea of suilty of issuing a worthless cueck a man J in vo slation of Section 14-107 tue General st tutes of 4 forth Carolina, which plea is accepted by the otate. It is judgment of the Court t.at in the comion jail of Iredell Count y for a period of THIRTY JAYS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the Ste te m | ; ; oe he defendant be coniineda Highway and Fublic jorks Commission. This sentence is to commence at the expiration of the sentence in No. 1330. O. 1332 | fORGERY vtate The defendant in open court through his counsel, Noel aoe woodhouse, ‘E8q., waives finding of a true bill of indict- Phillip salino | ment, and tenders a plea of guilty of issuing a worthless i meee check in violation of Section 14- LO7of the General Statutes of North Carolina, which plea is accepted by the sti ite. :, It is juigment of the Court that tle defendant be confined 4125 “onorable Court takes a recess until wednesday liorning february } in the Common Jail of Iredell County to be assigned to work 1950 at 9:30 O'clock ’ under the supervision of the State Highway and Public worse ere Commission. This sentence is to commence at the expiration of at the sentence in No, 1331. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘ FIRST WEEK -= JANUARY TERM,1950 15 WW . Wednesday, February 1st,1950 Tee \ N THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK: ---JANUARY TERM,1950 Wednesday, February 1st, 1950 WNT SV AT } { sur Ji tL 4 ORTH CAROLINA, IN T i oUt ut LOR COURT, tl) The defendant in open court through his counsel, Noel Woodhouse 4 NOR | a0, waives finding of a true bill of indictment’ and tenders q ! hill ip Salino | plea of guilty of issuing a worthless check in violation of We 23 Section l4-] 107 of the General statutes of North Carolina, winie h F | plea is accepted by the State. . E State, Judement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common | of Iredell County for a period of 7 a DAYS to be VSe issisned t work under tae sul vervis on of tue State ilighway and ; ; Put a gh oind oo iission. This sentence 1S to commence at the expira lm Lyla ..a¢ tion in i, reve NIT ARDY 5 ‘) — O50 ; fi TREDELL COUNTY ° JAN ut Y ( 3 ) TERM,1950. Hat | | (i } | | Carpenter. { i i } This cause comine on to be heard gnd being ieara before the undersirne. cluUlwo “ : ——— Ic | » a jc } Ee. l e a . a ase Sa ies ee ea CT AT i) No, 1334 I URGERY presidin: Judge at the January (30) 1950, Term of the Superior Court of iredel a Wey Z| tate { The defendant in en court thpou;h his counsel, roel doodhouse, ; F cape : fete el ; , et Yourt fiz el } MM 7 ives finding of srue bill of indictment and tenders a county, North Carolina, and it appearing to the vourt, anda the Court Tinacin H Hi illip Salino | 2a of ilty of issuin > a wor check in violation of ; ie HE ’ jection lho]. ? . the General of North Carolina, which : fact t; t the prisoner, Lula Liae sarvente ts ao charred With navine cornu iitted eM 1 Hl lea is accepted by the State. , ; ee Judement of tne Court is that the defendant be confined in the the crime of murder in the first degree, and that when the prisoner was broupat Rh 1 i 2Oruion jail of Iredell County for a period of THIxTY DAYS to be : ; : 4 th oh Ht mae vo Work unuer bie, Supervi: 1 of the State Uirhway and into court to be arraigned upon saic charge it was suggested that tne prisoner + a) eH ubli@ \orks Comission. This sentence is to comuence at the vee hie i h expiration of the sentence in No. 1333. is now insane and for that reason mentally incapable of pleading to tue bill f a 8 ‘ yt Tite rif Bay i 4 a - _ 5 -aline her defense: } indictment end of undertaking ner aelennse. hit / ' ot ] 5 | jk i i ¢ rt rowW68Y 7 COUN Se) N 7 - ANCA ° 1 ait - hy Y naa ann +} YA Fa yywrt) ~n 4 y y Hl iy 4 r ae | . “fs : ee ee a VUMISE Ls OCs. eNews and it further appearing to the vourt, and tne voury tures r Linain ayia i ’ - Oe gee ge ae a 7 CaN Ss I indictment ana tenders a gant & ee ii] 1 4 - LUY - Soul 2 worthles cre.c in viol LOY ft 1“ cd ! a dome Ania osen orn and empanelle to sé on ii bf oom ecti BT ey , . tanawe’ Gicatunt ae : par ee AOR OS as facts that thereupon a jury duly cnosen, smn ini , ii} Pi Mt 3 L tae General ot tutes of rth Carolina, wiich Kt a if - . , € h Gave ° “wr 2 g aA Yr \< + y y x i enne and nH aye 4 a Pee a a the followl! a ue, Via: 'Ts the defenaant, Luis bh. Varpenter, now insane na MELTS ‘ 4 A , vs Y &2ne ace mt OC COnliInNnec n tie mae i| a ; ’ 9 = - it | C 4 rede 0 CY > j » v to he " 9 PS ae 25% 3 + 4 " Be 7 a : . . 4 vO 08 for nt penson mentally incapable of pleading to the bdiid of indsctheny d oe tovwr ; } 4 tote * for tnat reas n | d i ate M I ry LON oL CNe ve fay nd rm J } ' . : . . di iJ rks LOommission. i entence is to commenc } j ‘ . . £A tan tYaoctl- i) eee 2oobOls LA0 5 CIVEence 18S CC commence vb one F ‘ e ote wus ‘as + a wr CN AWweErer said issue tes": at 4 ee Lion tie sentence in No. 133/ of undertaking her defense? and that tne gury answered GQ 4\ j i ie vy } . * 3 ; ‘ 4. ‘a i re 5 . o " “ ™ : = s la ’ 2h O YY c t ai taareby establishing as an ultimate iact that the said Lula i:. Varpenter 1s Wa Vad rei J wl . Wee Whe f it ie a a ' a : t ; . ©9949 ~ OL ba) Bee tate i . naw incane and for thet reason mentelly incapable of pleading to the bii- of tha Ge a : : ‘~ t rough ner counsel, Noel Woodhouse, now insane ana ior Une ees GEES Ses : : Miah Hi | i ' / vee 4 yOntena Wt (au a ; os rie sige i sOUTu Ls vniat pr yer ior ju iIent oe nad indictment and of un lerfaking ier aqeLlense: ah { i ow ee SEM Rasa’ ahha ve To ‘TE EF ; a HY . t earit t t by reason of id hearin i cetermil 40% Wy f It anvvearin irther th y son ‘ side i ( 1 ‘+ A a a ° = a Tamnanter <} 1 > eMmoy c U sie tat {a al iy oe { — . of said issue, the prisoner, Lula ii Varpe nter, shoula ove 1 bed i I rl acy a ’ 1} - au } 4 Va cd eanes A 1.ay iy L950 ‘ , S ‘ae “2? ~ 9 om . ~ ars 5 "°c © . 7 i _ 4 ( ‘i ry i ul \ Coat! ; . . wmansant 5 the 1 sions of Section lec 5 Of gst Hospital at coldsboro, Ne Ue, pursuant to th rovision ) iy ' . | 3 i VY + ny gon) + . eo «a _ nAront ¢ e) ereof: i noe: “4 RGLAI the General statutes and amenamenvs ile am . Lab V 1 VIIV LUCY ‘ matter ier + ; s . x ‘ a p . won @ : Xmas yet © , os iis NOW. THEREFORE. It is hereby ordered by tie Your: ‘ u Le ’ ’ , q 4 : b« ahy t } yla fic Yarpe be and sie is nereby y l. That the defendant, Lula /.ae var} enter, be an ) 4 . } t Ve : : : " one @ 1 i fr re- ! ‘ . - poe Ny — pes co otha’ of ‘nlde x j urs ant to the av - u be i : : y w e Lil icte ; 2£oF . Cc a? 7 felo: y ol committed wV0 tne vtate mOO LY ave 4 GY 7OLAG U6 r , ” ss - ) Vs } we i 4 u lIirst de a ¢ Hhetwe unt , ™ ; . : ie “ ree i bel! without funds with 1 ch to , > : sre Ar rinte- Bhd 17 ’ ‘ . "eva CO } ‘ : . as = oT a nee eataA ; — inn lala . ant ‘ } > ioard f pirectorS ana wupelidiiy ae , ter! eounsel, @ vo t ointed Noel sodhouse ec member said etatute and amendments thereol, ana Giie oaro i { ae wet MHOOU MOUS ® ue *» ’ vu ( G V ( + A es aeliinl a es ee a a for e CJourt r, to represent her in t.ie proceeuin efore : ; . = : receive said Lula hae Jarpenter eee endent of said Hospital are hereby directec to rece. mo ON i se defen t krou eee ‘ue — . : C 4 a4 ? I . Sz’ Salida coun el, INor peeing arrarsnes Pe ; nintain , id nia jae / ' uv ~ 4 4 : a A ‘ a tia . laid : : ee ar » and malinv:« SalGQ wks uAS ‘ eles CABLES v Capital felony of murder as a patient in said Hospital and treat, care ior ale _— Lt y 4 - - y te i C4 i uv ats i€ ree enter l t - ¢ ~~ : & on ‘ : ne { \ . t 77 7 : Pe = — =e t nt = = 4 , } naments thereof u vu l ‘ n OY la, +nee ee | z > a2 s 3 fr ; a. . : eS en’ + 4 - anc am iC menvus sil sacs ~ @ idictment ; ntally incavable of pleading to the bill 0 Sarpenter therein pursuant to said statuve ana ndment mabad we VIIOTLY n I undertnak? = : i ) ANGePruaKin ex { nse * + 1 12 w + } ry vovV ry r ‘ a} s . Tw AToaunty s hereby airecvea to convey 2. That the Sheriff of Iredell vounty is revy Ollowin sue was auhmi te ‘ a ; ond deliver Sue S suomi ) h4 ‘ - ee } ar + ia oak . ‘ er Si’ | Aehc NN u na aelive tted to the Jurv and answered by tHe said Lula jae Carpenter to the said Hospital at Goldsboro, Ne Ye, one follows : l Pat . her to said Hospital, pursuant to this judgment. 7 | Ee SS fee | ? it f the evidence before the Court and jury at LUL =---<=° 3. That a transcript o n G ie, ee ade o spy thereof the hearing and determination of the aforesaid issue be made and a copy iS the def y+ 1 : , ny fn Senbatiie Sunnnciita cA oe ULa ib. Garpen now insane. ard * ; ‘ ‘ 8 { at Goldsboro, We Vey mental’y incapable of pleading to the 1 eal iow insane, and for that reason forwarded to the Sunerintendent of said State Hospital at Go deiense? Od OL anaictment and of undertaking her ' ; aid by the Board —: i end costs incident to the makeing of said transcript to be pai of Commissioners of lredell County, North Carolina eee, no i ~ B bbitt See This the lst day of February ,1950. aes Presiding Mere is Be OE 3 \ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 16 FIRST WEEK -- JANUARY TERM,1950 Wednesday, fehruary 1st,1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 17 FIRST WEEK e-- JANUARY TER: 25 1950 t Wednesday February lst, 1950 + e ~ =) 1 i a motor il oi IY u | otave wie ‘ ihe Bee - ! : ING DRUNK ne Hy li 490 REAKING. ENTERING AND LaRCENY E : DRIVING DRUNK Th ! } é . e Ci hare -c OL i NOe Ljid ane mba F No. 1261 The defendant tirough hi counsel, Hur mene... nso enters ros ull * iV e - +} - Tr aoe 4 State a plea of nolo , to th n - s } ee C ns Ope x ) \ te E vs | yenicle on the public highways while under the inf uence of a John H, Gant : B, N. Freez intoxicants " i ba i : Win 32 The jud; “ment of the court is that tne defendant pay a iingol — Hi AN , i were % 5100. oO and the costs, and that he be confined in the comnon jail] hee ihe rf a. & | Bal DON NT AND umn ek 3 ae Iredell County for a period of NINSTY DaYs to be assigned to it i bate \ Oh SFUR Hee SON a work under the rig le aber of the State Highway and Public sorks | bili V } Commission. The road sentence is suspended on conditions: at ; Hf Harrel} ‘Wi 3H 1. That the as pay the fine and costs in full at this Hei! . term. bi ANE ‘ , " “ 2. That the defendant not operate any motor vehicle upon the | ig Oo tao LOANUONDUGNGE Al a WU QUES ats a chnwavs for a qd of TWELVE MONTHS. ra ie Sti te ol Pros ‘ita ane) a a : meee . ay et Mag oy ae oe ee aenes without further order in the Mi i . VS +t is agreed that the defendant shall pay che cost exclusive event tne fine and costs are not paid in full at this term, other- ee i He ee ugh P. Fitsgerald Of SO01iC1L0rS Ie. wise only upon motion of the Solicitor and superior court Sud : e- wk ae : | then presiding at any time within TwsLVh + ONTHS From the date of eH Wh f I SI ; the rising of this court pon satisfactory proof to such Superio wa a ie gr } j It saninn tn tha ¢ eng that the prosecutrix in this action i: : Court Judge that the defendant has violated in whole or in part nn , os not les 1 that the ec | referred to in the roceedinvs is now any ag the conditions upon Watch “ne road ae = =" eae ie | Hb Morrow in the custody of the f t; that there remains in the hands it as ordered by tne sourt u oe hg sip om ae i ei bot ee itt Hs PA Slerk 5 rior Court certain money which unier former order: im stricken out. It appears that o¢i fa has now be 1sSued. 1 a . } ; - . 2 _ + > |1)N + , yy} <i ! P| : i J u a VE Vile & vv uc C; : bed ' b 1% i ! { I im in the han I the (¢] is : . m +. a | y yor ‘ rs > + fs £ ah , S SSM fF SNE aE ee . . . t j , | a ¢ Mase taka 4 Lantead ¢ nah Se eee eae “ -_ It is ordered by the court that tie Jci Fa on the bond be gintl i stricken out. if Jontinued for tne defendant. } t © + ' < mM — ee failing to support mee 1350! e€ juarment 4 hh aa inj f Tredell Cox 1 jail of Iredell Coz ei1€ : = 4 ST a ii} Battley ‘enters a plea OL WUE rUijsile } 9) tery 1o1 led it Jury Sworn and e inpane. i ede i en nt YAIIEh 5 aA ai Vw oe a 34 aia r e2 bo 4655] to work under the snnerric Sts ee . ne sCU ne Wore undaer v s1€ supervisii i x e S . oe ' i ' a oe c ~ t b < o ue Ok O O ctk . tect oO t \ i ~ Pet Se SE : << C -~ ' Q oO « os @ ~ & hy oO = @ +3 =~ er = ct tO + oO v Q ) t m mre a cto er < Oo rH C ~ os © D e : mc ~~ ct — 4 ty ~~ mk et '¢9 bY $ t t m . - > —< SS a i » “) Al | RGB ry 7 , antene S iH + URE SsliON. Line } Senvente a rown ; as ss pS zm er ie nt 3 3 i ut, Bp : } ) I owin Ponditi : ae ee ee eee Pending trial or tb case court took a recess until 1) BS os . . Saas nine. February 2nd.195 dita BWR a wile - U t of thi ction at this tern. thursday b.orning, seoruary <na,i7iVe ae | i t 4 | a , ‘ ; . . } 5 vlerx f this Court sum of EP . ty t e on the ot ay of ERE - ™ " « wi ae 4h / Jd 9 ’ 4 [ . Y t € otn 4 of eac r x 1 ai ii . - : - ey Oe i ' WR ’ +153 ' ‘ od fie i ati 4 J ~ 4 ba meee os e {i —-—= dad asd ri - r 4 e tc a Valve ' ——— Pay ale v + 4 & / iv vu S J ve Vv so i i y an ntil ‘ ud-ment vs i it | i ~ UNVI eee meny - } aH ‘ . } roenter he ae Pel 4 L I Y ‘ “ ~, 4 ¢ ae J i sve i he n to t cutrix, Estelle hz ne . ’ I r 7 1 ort ainte ce o1 tit e Ls ointead oy vne Hh * } he ee t i yrdered that hoel ite Ge OOM ; oe aN © i \ . ’ He 7 1tment to 3 ve + out f'1 "ther “dA ty : poahwy lo ed at > - a. Sree am ir er OL 6, Ae “> sith } + . > ~ - . ad nt 7yY) t 5 ; A e e Lil ~ ~ cs. o . ” 4 ARM eorex > ‘ 3 t i iY *) t + -e + ” a INC! . yvOurU LO represenvu Vv e 1eL16e a sv aah ~ — ™ ’ teil, me 4 . ee i : 7 . - = : a ~ Us ~ Week we veri, ‘oth erie 1 Se ont : P = } a pr erior Court Juige then presiding at oi ' ‘ces in the trial of this case. as 4 AYU Vv vu 5 ii i Pi 4 as ms o a 4 ‘ ° a frnaet AT service: a une io a Geek * Viliw - - . > + 24 ; - *+ ee vne sun iL UeUU i »Y his } roiesSssion ofivirl’e wo Wa ~ Ur-ve ) be vii ris2in . J 4. aw VV I Ct z Oo! t S110} } Yr YA pt T lowe te 4} } Fanaa ant + . ; = ve eee, Mee Pil sOurt Judze tnat the deiendal - Hi) e A tI OLE O Y + ‘ .* +" sci . . a s, } +} ¢ Het i ie a rin part any of the conditions upon which tne re {y ence i. j De 1€ ‘ di ceca ec x } I ~ @ J i + + > + “te © Os it eave : VS | es iubert l ! | ) q : i ah _ : 4 VOe Live i Vv i } tote { P rt ae : - ; ~- 4€L20CNdane enters a nlea of not o949 | Vv | liww sures = Li 4£€4 O01 not ULLUY. e « Ah y why i fil ra I eY mo I> ‘ Ae ‘ ’ 1 = '* yr \ e ~— a 44a ii Asi J ea: 1as . + ee ‘ i lubert Ray Holleman L.cJunki sony , vhas 4 Gaither, Hoyt lurdock, f+ Hs madtecn” wo RHGEST, Ae be Byers, Be Fz Brown, Lawrence }.a500, : ‘ scott luack | vies ] } . ‘ end . ’ e syles, lig J. Hartline & ; This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday liorning, Vo. 1302 | J ‘TING TI ——ae E february 2nd, 1950 at 9:30 O'clock. a tate ‘ne defend: nt i : abe ai AL LD wt LICENSA REVOKED let ap ase meee endant through his ‘ Tape ; ples VS f ’ GUILTY, mre .S Attorney, ur. Hugh licAuley enters 2! jamuel Y. Alexander Jury sworn and mpanelled palte Wwe it tue el oO n lm « co wa ; j igs? semen of aan ko of “ne State"s evidence the defendant moved for J ion t otion alloved Defendant di , ° e.endant discharged. liorning, = February IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --=- JANUARY TER. 1950 Thursday, February 2nd ,1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on T lursday = En ena, 1S ) D0. Sa , 290n JANSLAUGHTER ' NO» 1320, | - A “ a” ° 1320-4 (This case is resumed for trial) 1320-3 it the close of all the evidence the defendant moved for judgnent State } of Non-suit. iotion allowed. Defendant discharged. “ae a : vs | | James Ww. Brow | | No. 1319- i AND RUN DRIVING 1 | otate | fhe jury returned verdict of GUILTY as charged in the bill of v: { Indictment. y A | lubert 9liemar It is judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in ty , cowion jail of Iredell County for a period of FIGHTEEN NTHS to be signed to rk under the supervision of the State Hichway and lic ‘orks Com sion. : lo. 1319 iTNgsse In u zhter e of Hubert Ray Holleman Py, ? i, nt ed J Jud-me Nisi Sei F state _ “88 Ces , ed failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Insta vs i vaPlase i ilbert xussell C S of i We si 2 i te j ,ONYL ued Lor tne atate Vé } ve e inenart ! 4 No. 1305 Vii.G +) > a 5 . . , 1 . . 7 or vtate oe ee us counsel, Hugh G. Mitchell, Eo., ente ys LLit,. seorge Lac ex . A ¥ OL & ourt is thet t defendant pay a fine of ; v ; t t he he confir how iets seein ae a 1) = ’ vat be confined in tue common fil of Irede iol ae a : ° Y JaYS tobe assigned to work under tit : m OS Soe SSase ay and Public Works Commission. he : ve is 1 CE nm conditions: 1 L € > . ’ : 4 : on ° Rog ~S t tne fine and costs in full at this tele v be delenaant not opercte any motor vehicle upon th 7 = i vile tf to o we + } ’ mat d : es “3 : ea - a * he State of North Carolina for a period of TWELVE Mie ® and ee issue without further order in the evelt tam oe SUS re not id in full at this term, otherwise only wy P tion ft : . zi ae , : Validwo Uv bing ) ic v0 7 d ee gee vOr an iperior Court Julge then presiding até ati Saetory. > 3S from the date of the rising of this cour Vewe r 1, 24 a ‘ ’ ; + ent lated in of to such Superior Court Juice that the defendant: -V a , 4 1OlLe I ,y+ ¢ > rod a ‘2 . h ri sentence is or in part any of the conditions upon which the i Lt o S I le = No. 13 | U otate e i nt +4 j lee vs of b~ is attorney Mr. W. R. Battley enters 4 pi ~ vy e@ sharles owmitn - 4 > é I i 4 evi ’ o ° a m ATL " Vill viaence entered a verdict oi Ji User No. 1319-a ve in iiafislauchter Cas Pu m Bae Wai ‘tnte ont ed until ; ™ ise ol dubert ray Holleman State 7 Intil iv term, 1950. vs eka oer | t ~,1000.00 for his ar earance in the may Term 1950 Russell Cass rior Court. oa . ” a NO. 1325 { R otate | sontinued VS | Sinnie C owr { No. ] a tY State sontinued : ‘ ( ~~ \ Corby Kelly ~— P : : " rt { es Y Cese . : , / Os cess until lionday hiorning, February 6th, 1 ms t 10:00 ¥ lock, * i Notct= = IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1950 Monday, February 6th,1950 NORTH CAROLINA, SUPERIOR CURT IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY Tisha, 1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjoumment on Monday, at 10:00 Otclock, with Honorable William H. Bobbitt, February Oth, 1950, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Tern, 1950, present and presiding. Dd. morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of tue following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this the +r + LOe=WLd * Second Week of the January Term, 1950, Iredell County Superior Court, +, Johnston vred Sherrill i bkirs. Je Me Alexander Je Ke Jolly os odds we £6 455 fw . mman L a+ pa yr Be Ae AMON mooervu te Sloop Harry uarrison Harry os — . ; ‘atl Jas. We Brown Js F. Harmo: : iu Kabhaw Lrse Leste ,ATNCY i i i aimee Lb ° , Enea Le &e MCNCCLY cs We narer rs. Bessie Ue i.cu ugney - rryy ~ oo Se. ss 2 9 oo ), &. Thompson Chas. A. ucNeill John i. er mith | >} om2vun weeCL c yo pr Ves + - * ” le e ers, rel Ll. ivette — aie ee be ‘ AV .. nobinette 1c orrison Tee . -e yers . / rry ouarriso! Ss excused otatute=- | irs. Lester Cathey, 2. A. Ammon, Ae we SMITH GNA veo ive Jolly excused on yertificates 4 De . meNeill as out oir tne vounvy , e } ‘ . ’ int? 1% ae 6 h ~r > : The followins mgm constitute what shall hereaiter ve termed t Jivorce Jury #1" toewit: horris G. Hobbs, Mrs. Bessie G. icGaughey, Johnston, de I. lurse J. li. Alexander, Jas. 4. Brown, wes. Fern T. Trivette, Fred Sherrill, m T, B. iicNeely, D. F. Thompson, David W. Robinette, John A. Gunn and Robert R Sloop. No. 4763 eas ‘ ona neien Stevenson Ang DIVURCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled andwers the issu Mel es submitted to it as follows: vlyde King mir ‘ . « > boul MULINA IRE ‘tT AU x SOUNTY lelen stevenson King IH [ca juo ic it Iu vs viyde King 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. ont Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more SlX months nex } i > of this Complaint? ans ° ext preceding the filing of t: f and have they lived separate 3. Did the defendant separate from the plainti apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. than and ———- a ee aetna es i a ae Ce ee eel crates . scence end mnenne errr ener ae eee SSE Fs. { " ‘gy . a Hi SB qt in a Wht ae th J ui dj I i } 4} i / IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERiM,1950 jionday, Febrnary oth,1950 IN THE SUPERIOR CuURT | \ SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM,1950 | jwonday, February oth,1950 ti . LTN T } wer * As 4 ; VaRULINA in the superior Court Noe 4775 ATTN January Term,1950 Ruby Waugh Basista Lnrobvnbo. COUNTY neal | 1H} i 4 4 DIVORCE llele syenson Kine ft Se " ss - : Ax H i BELED HUOTERROR S258 | . Tie Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn ami empanelled iif <> | JUDO tI L Joan Basista y answers the issues submitted to it as follows: tay a i] i! i VSe Wi Ay poet ae a (acne Yoram Wooing ourtiadus VUUAL, : Slyde King | ee I ; JANUARY 1950 TERM j , ry YAROLTN: NOria UV AVON Es Se aan Oh AestTN TREDo Lu VA UN ts _ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Term, 1950 } m,19 a * 1 ~ , "4 . - 1 o ts TY v2.7 . 1 Tr 2% ° r. vr a hn B sis Superior Court of lredell County, before His Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge Pres. Ruby “augn be sa ,dAane ancl + ; attr ang ¢ Sayre aut - nnewur . : «14 } Sen = $4 : P } LGINE, NQ ¢ Jury ang tne Jur avin nswereda ii tne issues submitted to 1¢ in bh, VS. iecielaceiicccc —_-a_= pe jc jue vy i favor of the plaintiff end against the defendant, as fully appears ih the record: John Basista \ fala 5a Te ait ct renee wee —— ee ee a eemeeant ~ Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, a TS NT p! i : : wh F + ; i | ‘ ° ' inl dae tie ce i + won hawn Fa] ‘ AT} , 1ey | nd 1t appearing to tne vourt that there were born of the niarriage of the plaintif 1. a ees tt | th iit H 4 ny ¢ loaf, Sowa in slat 2 oem ’ ees i — er ne , oe is . -s 4 ee ae ae A aread j nh omni aint? Hi { a. nd the defendant, two children, Carol King, e 5 years and Patricia Ann King, now husband and wile, as alleged in the complaint: i he i ANSWER: Yes. Wee i . 3 years, and it further a; ring to tne Court and te Court finds as a fact : if \ Ne a . ° : - . oe eee me se a | - > LOX Taiqwvec Men 1 : p >, Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, ana aave they lived in HE + + ’ . + 1. i 7 i ' ' / i vu U v 4. be 4 . ut > i ©) v ns V Vile C istody 414 20 trol of i . ! separate d apart fromeach other, for more tnan two years prior to tne s > ren, & i trici ins, that the best interest of said ia : : lai institution of ‘this action, as alleged in the complaint - cudlar ald se } i in cust f their mother, e being found to be i: Yes. *3 + + » ? + 74) _— Pal : > ° . -~ . 2 2 : - P ; TT a "Trt L1U j rson I Giie Cu SG Ly 7 sai a “nild fis ‘. Hes the ~ylaintiff been 2 bonifide reside it Ok Vae otate ol Nor ta + t { Y I — 7 ‘ *, - - } Lo » _ , 2 > : So 3 . } ~ +" . + r ~ \ + ¢ f . - ste ? puel ) ‘ 4 leCcreca Uv t tne bonds of ii srimony Carolina for more tnan Six montns oelor e tne com.ene t o1 +0 ous ? re i) } er > l e> l ec - , - ‘ sll ms . » . _— ¥ 0e, and bie Sane ar ered) llere tne complaint ssolve ft : t . . es . y , - Vid ~ J - ¥ A ve A vorce irom t At ferde r i ers +Cvde nt. J rtvuer orde ly ed an treed that the 1 intiff, elen Stevens ’ ‘ Ped) i fuli miplet re, custody and control of te i : ; ; 4 4 sha ; . “uv — iS / Ay hg " ; rer , t * - T 7 " J il 2 50 Tamlie i ae Hat “9 + ~ “ wee, she ded e a Seial! == i i iy + t tale ‘Ma ti } . ; : she ‘2D ~~ | oC A i] = 7 i aa a ‘ re oe o Z E ‘ r Bal a4 Y WAAL ad we OU ’ ae it reiates to tne custody of the children is retain® '? . ia 4 rther orders. Je l s--+-=++--++- i nh ; : s : ee ¥ j at | p [ ? 9 vonn sista ‘ J 9 . a : ‘ ‘ : ee jum Kea a* hia Tem f +he ei eee This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at tnis ierm of the wm. He Bobbitt Se - JUDGE PRESIDING . : ’ ~ i . . Csawaltne hef i's Honor. \.i iam | ouperior Court of lredel L County, North Varoiin ly beilore 1S nonor > * dlliiam He by } Oe a ‘ ; : eel <a eeneheicl he iea : \ Bobbitt, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues \ subed es alae he plaintiff and aceins ie defendant ) Ro. t , : submitted to it by the Court in favor of th plaintiff and against tne deren ’ AM eo *¥O)U" oo L© d 1a LisQi.i Vv naoln r ae ’ . a ; a : i No Wi). lell: alkanw we : tg Ge Jontinued for tae | . . » / opey AS ba cid Af , ° > 4 ) . ‘ ‘ - h ae e + 4 No, LF ry 4% teens il Sst LKED, worwmnemenn-nn - Continued for the 28s Set out in the record: : : 1 rvs. dohr iller . imuad © the : a 7 ae wis it Py, seewwenje- Continued ior U-iK :--: sz ' a Salts Fat lia ai , 9 sae auc VS | etty Pope Shue- Sontinued I or te e : Tt is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court tn it tne oonds oO : ' ~. bb? ‘eee ne OL verry & Aumple vs lvin R Eyder= Continued for ¥ NOe i - ¥ est ’ > os I oni : n+ 4 193 3 co ae <4 a ‘ . ° - ono i ¢ ome? Inat . ¢ . } » 4091 - rren v rry Howard, --< avanues by Conners latrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Ruby Waugh basista, and vie rry noward, ------ Continued by consent i : :; ava harehy cissolved. and the plaintiff 4elend ant, John Basista, be, and the same are ni reo. 1L,SS04 ved, @eiia t it p+ 2tivid iS granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. ; Wm. H. Bobbitt ig aa i JUDGE PRESIU ING. : j ET e ; , IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIUR CUUR' N THE SUPERIOR CUUE et eM co Donate arc : SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERu,1950 SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERiM,1950 lionday, February 6th,1950 fionday, February 6th,1950 North Carolina, In the Superior Court iredell County. January Term, 1950. No. 4760 iia Pp, Gilleland pee, jasista ye VJLVUMUL the Divorce ury ;1" being duly sworn and empanelled answ ssues submitted to it as follows: ta } 3 j 1 : : " 1 CAROLINA to be heard, and being heard Honc TY being he COUNTY . Teri, 1950, Superior Court f' . sitha P. Gilleland Yor « } vourt, and the Court -_ rn eee ~ Basista, was born to the marria: fit ] e ps and defendant married, as allesed in the Complaint having been born on "0 a 4a ne 4UCE ty } w+ Sern hen int Lived st »% oe Ing y syn mother, the la Re rT two ears n G ] * tn commencement afin + . ent rd belLtore tne unaersi Ls 20urt of } : f sno ere submitted to tuem 11 vor < e plaintiff January is further ordered aay JL 3CON THE spUP ERL 7) D JEEK RC NU QUR vRy't Bria 1950 lionday, February 6th teu IN THE SU ; . trate SECOND WEEK ——— PERLOR CO URT cubes scenes JANUARY TERM , 1950 jionday, February 6th,1950 a Bo 4. answers tie issues submitte ed to it as i 1 yl om VOROE + ; Lei wT ~ . . - i dith Smith watts { VSe | The Divorce Jury /1" being duly sworn and empanelled IT VORCE eer { answers the issues submitted to it as follows: sil at Bs 1) 1 iva cP Jisaman Yih ik VOe The Divorce Jury wy be ins luly sworn de F Tr orn Wp LD on m il ine C ae 4 an enlp anelled mu 0 LI! IN THE SUPERIOR COURT il / bed 4 vee ' foll wS? NUwLa sua Aart? , ” Tris hid IVUUN TY JAW U Livy TERA, 1960 = } i TH C AROUI ‘ NT ii SUPI ERLOR COURT : as )ishman { \ f TREDELL COUNTY JANUAnY Tani.,1950 Henry be Yisilie Ti 3 isz2tstez if | ait ; OMmitA atts a | ¥ 1 ! | 22 - - sva G. Visnman \ Hi ev <e<eeneerommtsess | | \ i i i i "s 0 w O ct cr > “s . | Y i , 4 ‘ er ‘ + Iaf + nror “me «ae al lTankraa Reem ee ee ny ; usban ana Vi -y3 GY A ULE t lib } | 1 jue uae na wne aele Lan ntermarrvy aS @€siGEcu ih v 7 int ‘ } . é d » Wha LALLY wie Ps Hit Jid the plaintiff and cefendent separate, ana ve th asides each Paes ES en » - : 4 4 > * . ct r c c PH = > ct — ~ > OQ ct ct < ~ t , s , Pap ' u tl ol < Vile i al se SU de oes + v 4 i 141i Sey s u } . - “ J : Q a ae = _ sw + c ~ ut ¥ r: ies. to t stitution of this action, as ered in the complaint c r:; ies tC + . + Oa 4 4s ar ‘ answer: foe * be bne a Db Ss ve irom ii Zntili ana aave ey Liv separate tt a ! / hi * . » | - z : . ; s ‘ * } 21) n+ & i YA Aa t > e ~ ‘ i 4 yt i ¢ ann yr f . : , ~ . 2 “ $ on + ’ 9 ad we nas iié L SHG cS < TALL LU 4UCvoiuUei. - Y + + ; part for O 7 rs or mor llered in the Complaint? ° i - re | ’ 7 Pe _ — a — + c , y i Nn : 2@ varor r re v i oy oe < Uilvuiiw US 4 vss vw UY 22s © C uv dd Viild a Ui > i} , il in . om _ 7 mt i ; l 1 the complaint i = i mmswer: LES. i i it Al ee COURT canal aeaitiaiiti ‘| ‘i i % i. Putui, 4 t ie i : ; i { Lv. 2 Val wa I i 4 Ja 4 ii} h r 4 ‘ . { 4 be aw j ie . ++ »~ ) it ' } I y th rea « Vu BS gchar fetal yah. es acne ers «ey apap gL ARP om ry le L1snman | i 4 wr i ai 4 y | t : v : " : VS6 Lok ee So om ° + On U i *G C e , Yy a + oy 7 rT ym 5( | ; ” Sara av Lie nuary Tern, 1% iva G, Dishmen 1 , * = / 4 y> - . 7 ° a ai . 79) “ aaVi i] J uc resi. ° ‘ } Yn + Yr? { ’ ae * VES, VY 5 cause comin yn to be neara, ana bell; neara L erm of fF : — ‘ i A aw Ay» ‘ i: y Sia } t 4 + - yo 4 ¢ VA 4 v w A Re) Sut iLUvS a Oo Lv i. 7 4 AVVe » , r > ¥ » \¥ . : Vue oO pe aon VOUrD Of rede ) . rus ro. > 4 Od “ I ’ ; it Lil€ i wis st sa efe + >. ‘a ¢ + or le w ) 2 Y . orl * * , . : ? -ULs) eal in tne record, 43) hh + 1 ae $34 and a 4n0rv ond th uy" vine answeret tae | tak : ot bitt, Judste Presidin 9 na Jury, na tn Jury as nsw } : Vv re ’ é ly — 4 4 ‘ ~ tr Oo! ; / ACULE A u v u € Onda wo pe ao the ° ‘ . 4 7 3 + — net | .c y ~+ : + 4 Wer + y t % y au Lae u a retofors ' ‘ 7 ‘ ’ 4 ues § itted to it dy th rt in Lavor Os & platy . : =m U | nti i tie dafandscnt } ‘a 2 “eo here i LAULs iv aei 1 v be, and the same — / +) Al Ls : : OlV lair whe Gelendant, as set out in tne recore: ; . ¥ , i + . i s : + : d Li 0 L * orce I rom 1e defendan ive ) ‘ 1 + } ~ c + c 4 ay A lera - 713 =) - % e ur fic WU A I + 4 ; a ia 40 18, tb 1erefo1 e, yrdere c 1ju ea Dy Ui sourt tnat v i ~ d ry, - + *) co - “ eed @ re ~—aeare , % le sntatTt a ] Vis] A 1 of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Henry 4. Hishman, Ie Ne ° 2b UYU ae ® <_ LAA . e . Tudse pre ing nd the defendant. Eva G 3} d the sane are hereby aissolved, and vudase Si 5 ae defendant, kva G. Vishman, be, Nn ie Si are Nerevy ’ sn? . son s ¢ Pa } A halal + vue plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce trom Une defendant. eae, eset a gy nm Jud ‘e rreslalng ‘ , 3K <3 38 3 362 2 A a5, ee “ B ~ _— = SUPERIUR COURT | eee JANUARY TERM,195 Awe + 1940 February 0th, 172 An mero second WEXK e-- JANUARY TERL.,1950 Monday, February 6,1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a” . ; 17 NOe Ls ( ' T ] Wy] mn wD TT. ’ 1{ SINA a4 4 dp IU UAL LS wi) | 1 NULLS Vsti Vaid orn am empane] ry TATTRITy follows: : IREDELL COUNT * d ; . t heine dgniv « 1" being duly sw submitted to it as : a4 4 F oe m \ auli e e nnovt iT James be tieé cna, T/A | - + Vy tts wiasonry Co y es oes ee Laci Wad ae te i ' i — os Jllie Kinmrougsn and WLS Ss — k i snbroucth; 1d1ius morougn G 12 nat + [ ymorou > dy + 1adLUS Ad! “ O “ : n me iid a Te ee vite, Zsther kimbrough; and connie i bd ; ' ee a e } » c . a swt oe | er He a * of the State . a Kes cuiacee kK, opicer and husband, ‘iobert opicer i t rH¢ nNtiL DeE ress. u a wis vw 4 Ui 2A DOL1NA é j 4 i . baal th i . ‘4 a ene ( eced t nstitution of this action wh i b lUslo 4 - |“moIN - vr < - Yafory ' ‘ e in t amour t, _-- Any ’ ae tl x “aud ‘ 4a if) ed Wh G 1 4. Gl a (i {4 answer. ins wit i | t 1 oa . + soni : ce allecred tn = @ -amn 1 oi nt ¥ i _ > u ca d ‘ deol’ ea iil Ui ~OMDLalnty it os i u Usd ~ i {| 7 » - t aries atv tad && ijtina Dnantae . 4 by Rese at ‘ “ aw “ fs . ‘ ye ‘ i 44i18M e Oo. itt, eu e resiaing na 2 gury v vne vanu ry erm oi tne ouperiior “ +++ a : 1s ay ohboit , urt f rede) - an } typ TT x * am fle Luv, ourt ol iredell County, 2: the ry nav ~ + mine * hy we . + , a a eo iterest thereon irom tne /tn Ny 10 ' . , . a ie ° + * iS . Soi 9 _" ~ “uty 1940 together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Ulerk. mus : ‘ o« ont! Iie ‘nls the oth day of February,1950. “47 °? oprpot y’ 4 + 4 °* } + 4 } ‘ . - } Lf j t be forevel . /8/ H. Bo bitt -_——_—_-- a LmON} retofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant Dé “WilTiam H. Bobbitt, Judge VYresiding a divorce a vinculo from tie aesenr . of hy ved avninst tie Hlaintals * . ¢ -4- ’ S action oc taxed azalinst F a jim. li, Bobbitt P —r 7 ‘ ; JUDG! 1 {31D . & Pas b IN. THE 5 Pir LU i COU . as m LN TH A $1) eT OF OUT SECOND WEEK =-- JANUARY comnee~ SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM,1950 Monday, February 6th,195 Monday, February 6th,1950 * 170) LOe &lyt North Carolina In the Superior Court It is therefore ordered and decreed that this judgment shall be a nr nN 14 raj > is s her 1 a j & c I 2 }r *) ] ™m > : } Tredell County Before the Clerk. lien against the premise ein described as of the 2nd day of December,1945. i > It is further ordered that the defendants shall pay the costs of this action. Wm. H. Bobbitt Judgfe Presiding indebted to the plaintiff? Ws ist ts U5 ADEA HEHEHE AERA HATES NO. SP=3314 North Carolina, Tn t:e Superior Court Iredell County. Pearl Kk, Sherrill, Plaintiff, sullen i herrill, Jefendant. Honor, William H. Bobbitt, ne Fifteenth Judicial District of Narth Carolina, upon the B. Winberry, Comuissioner, dated vant Report, dated February l, 1950, and it appearing to the Court Sherrill, the Defendant, nas offered t! n of Thr Thousand Dollars as7 2 ‘or the property described in the Petition; t.1: he person ii of One Hundred Sighty Yollars (3160.00) desires to ormit the sale of the property to Cullen t.. Sherrill; that the Sherrill, is financially unable any bid on the prope and desires that the sale be mad D mn tie Sherrill for of Three Thousand Dollars (33,000.00) ; that a sale to Culleni.. Sherril tae aintiff on the 23rd day % injure the rights of any person since the interest of only the parties rior Court of Iredell County, are involved. : Viet amount of $1135.60, and that said 4 > oi 9, THEREFORE, URDERED, \ND DECREED THAT: Slerk of Superior Court, and indexed and ¢™ radonel The increased bid of One liundred fighty Dollars ($180.00), filed page 156, and tiat wie Jueo through C. H. Vearman, as Agent, be withdrawn. lises described as follows: Cc. B. Winberry, as Commissioner, is directed to accept the offer er ' ‘ ee ra ehway Noe on the North margin of the pavement of U. »- Highway thn ayetd Satan . ue i. ~ & 6 : 1497 : . ‘ ; — i m a . ) the old \ayside School lot, now belonging to 4D 7) Te of Cullen li. Sherrill in the amount of Three Thousand Dollars (33,000.00) and ‘line of said lct and the line of irs. Edna Beaver i ,oF the Southern Railway track; thence WSR Sr een upon the payment of which, to execute and deliver to him a good and sufficient in an Jastward direction 100 feet to a stake; ee ie on the North marin of U. S. Highway No. 70; then” +) i Jeed; th: i issi i i d to make : . to Je 8 Wa >, é » that upon consumm of the sale, the Commissioner is directe Oo ma ; . ae lirection 100 feet to the beginning, containing about , seamen . staan tha’ Shah aaeed 3 to the above lot an easement or right of Way ong the South margin of the railroad fill a_ strip : d ex ; ‘ ; allroa J rip of la C wise an to tne culvert under said railroad. on p of land 1Cfeet wise @ artancdctas oO a acres a full report of the receipts and disbursements. this February 6th,1950. Wm, H. Bobbitt William Hf. Bobbitt, Judge Holding Courts in the Fifteenth Judici District of North Carolina. Be She SIE BIS BK BS 2k EF we He 3S 3K IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | ’ 7 , wre , AMITAD YW mmr OL SECON WEE , ore oe 4 al RY L Suatl , 1950 Monday, February 6th,1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM,1950 Monday, February 6th,1950 lo. 4761 os ‘our Hundred "ifty Dollars (3450.00) for services in connection with the Ube) ee Four 4 ° ‘ i ; vT.RrOm — yer IN IN Tide SUPERIOR COUR : ; Oe a NORTH CAROL Nig - -y ae tm thie aetion } ; na resentation of tne BInOr 3! Ville wa le | at See aimee Saal aes ; representa LREDELL U0 UNTY e JANUA RY T SRI, 1950 . an : : eee se | 3. That the Defendant pay the cost of this action to be taxed bj Herman Lee wteelman, a linor, By 5s I the Clerk of the Superior Court. | | } } ! { / / ——— His Next Friend, Ww. Elmer Steelman, oe a a a : | ' if X l e Th 1b t ic settlement petvween e Y Vilwsy enveread well, “A ; - / + / i >} at 4fT 2 oe ) e wT m : 1) | eee Ssaseeecs } 4 Your i t un onab] or untust to t! inor Plaintilrti Hy I oved DY oie urt, 26 HOW Uh eceyv yw hed ’ iu Pi j ' , HW ’ } iF} VDe | ee oe gas wane i i ut ig to his best interest. i | ; . > "8% 2 PL ~ - nN lL, ry eee * er ¢ ca it, Clifford Bunch, VJelendant. i ‘ine he inant) la. Nae ain es ebruary 6th : : ‘ned : 1 entverea if] vGoloovi ’ Orvwa VaProli!l » ¥ ‘ a ly : ith i hi +B a ; pi i — Vi | Ly DVe ; He : ‘ nun 4 . a “Sa ~~ Al + 1 Taniinyre 7 " Og O mies ee f This cause coming on to be neard at tne danuary ern, 1950, or tne : tT ee ane he : a a On ne enc —-— : ( . es Sates Sk ; ; ; — sien Me ee ee eae Bi a si i} Lredell County ouperior Court, beltore nis ‘ionor, iliiiam he. Bobbitt, Judge Presid. i ‘ A 4 ' PRE L ae : - 3 3 - } 7 1 they an « + fF top noarti > +95 +} 1 ‘ sy7 Ip) OF LAF »f-1C Wwe i ie ing, anc being heard by consent of tre parties without a jury; that the cause was Wb hl : fa } “i 1eard upon statements of counsel for bota rties, ana eviagence sSubmittec to the ‘ : } q } * ‘ . Hog iy } a. H ‘ . : x, )«r 7 } yar 5 y y - > - - - + * i H i >ourt by duly licensed Physician, from which it ears to the Court that the r Steelman 4, +} - se mali anayenatie ——— _ ‘ 1 t 7s > teely ’ ext IY 1ena Y i gy. me sE& - ath linor, Herman Lee wteelman, ten years of age, by His Next Friend, W. Elmer steelna, eS ae f ‘ Hy | ~* eR 0 - ‘ a aid “ i ss a : Bee ess 2 56 ee eye Ee b L Lituted t Ss >t10n t C Pr 6 g e sustained ecause oi Juries ae A - ¢ “INCL L Hi a ‘ | ~ ‘yr . ITE + s hal : msm 4 ‘ : aH rec veda \ en d L¥C AC il ss U € eLon n LO Vil nme y ’ noperry 3 a | y Te ~ £° »+ t € CLlenudyHy iy, Bat i if — , . 7 , Is r 7 + 5 ) 7 ? '@ } | s8i ¢ 1 t, we vats is OPa Cily I - iV ae ; L11Si0n n t a 4 hay st0ad Hy ai : — or - 4 néaraan a 14 wise t i Street it! i rbout 100 feet South of intersection of th ry itoad dq road otre te . NB tet i. . } SMB tt / + <i » + 4 . + ’ ai n 7 OQ 3 “ine to eal a SEL / Lr Uile€ aL L sLIAVe. 4 ’ ( val rola ’ n vune Vy I 75 nec it pir Ping v¥ me ae i ’ + + thie 1 ro . y ‘ " ; ’ ¥ fF -)}] Ka the U re < b intili 1d efend > have reed upon t settl ent olf 4 Chae a a \ 5 : sO22te r iy © * + 4 . } - + tters and things B It olf t..e ailesed injuries set forth in the fPlaintisl’s ee yt ey ’ 7 + ‘ + Yr + . , , = . enteer r , om int, by t terns I 1c C ¢ b : reed tc y the sum of sLigntee ck te - + ] ) d 1] i , 0 BY . ] . [ 7 2 yy , = ° ’ . - ar nwt y a, 4 ao 4 ee) undred Do rs { eJO) in te ttleimt of the minor’: Lege ru roiin ny Ty | + + ’ Troada’ ) + Lay y . ( / LT), 1I r ¥i,e2 a24vii LNE CC L c CtULONn. reqe.i , ) d | + > . a »} de ‘ “ * rt i fully « ined the evidence in the ease, pat Itton -2Pourbonnai ompan} | . t l r t re \ ’ e + y y OY + + ed i ' ? + v ly, Un id re t! j r preated, ‘ } . + 7 + + + ‘ * o { ' Y yt + + ” - g ~ ’ 7 ~~ + Y Vv 54 ~ . 1 Ss : . . irt tauat tle rents of the child are varesy llie Ki , Hlizabeth Kinbr rt y “tnd 4 +9 ‘ . ———_ Cisiilt U U ett t + . ’ : — ateavils : : ' : oe . Vid UM. we Ue s.eade vis Hospital, »-t ae l imbro ? stner i.imor >| |} yt 7 I 7 + + 7 198 yt. 27) no tre +) : 5 * re a ’ / te “sy 7 Sans i bl inion that the minor has made excesi\" onnie kK, icer obert Spicer | S { rec very ~)Y 5 er 2 t ve ‘ + ¢ + - rm 4 ie eo t t | 3 ode ob a l ¢ 7 4 e - } te eae YY a : ’ - vie injuries ich he sustained, 69 : ; ; at r ted to t nD] tiiz ae - . YO 1 A aster v ” fter fully ir tiry into ¢ matthew « . : ha t mount, V re tue i 1vuS 1 - sOd J 4 Ly a4 i ) ve e Y Taye + Pad DT Ares _ } ” _ i es jurtv enters the following decree: is s ‘ = v rs 1 Raed OS eT ino nswer é ) a . -4 t iS riaatl I ree rer - + ) ’ — mares ’ iwi ie é -* L v A2d0IULL1 recover rE tne Jefen lant the sum of Nighteen nuns ; , V1s3 (* ‘ OL Ive \ L e + ‘ . - +e j 1 ¢ Cc y + gs _ é ’ ™ dant into € ffice of the Clerk of ¥ ri ,y ’ ) rt f red: ] yn i ty — . 7 72 © + C 7% rtn rolir . 7 n + — — ; e i ey ‘s ca er = de - , Un Dé } 4 | 9 aesl “a ! av f , S paid to him, the Clerk shall pay to the Davi : ee “ Hospit: ior the hospital the a ‘ ail . 1OSpsv retne hospital the doctor's services. the of T Hundred Forty-5%* » tne sum of Three ' a Ss mother, lirs. Ww. E. teelman, the sum of Forty-two : i OLLare (342,00). to retmhures haw Pac a ice ee teauburse her for loss of time: to the liinor's father, “+ } slman - S19m » * we arate ad Steelman, the sum of forty-five Dol] and nursine : | °c : £ . Re ioe aan ie : : rs (545.00) for hospital, medicine, expenditures made by 7 nim; to the minorts attarnay ’ e +4 1 ’ Lnor' ¢ ttorney, “8COn i.. oimons, the sum of Ty rut IN aril “T AT iwWnK -—— A TT SECOND WEEK - JANL Monday, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM,1950 Monday, February 6th,1950 & SUPERIOR COURT NUARY TERM.,1950 February 6th,1950° lio OL : ; : : ig ee . ‘our Hundred Tifty Dollars (3450.00) for services in connection with the cane niente IN THE SUPERIOR COURT oe" NORTH LANULINA , : ee pea in this action representation of the minor in nts 2 Ul Olle + Y . = ‘ Linde TREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERi:,1950 > © 3, That the Defendant pay the cost of this action to be taxed by Herman Lee wteelman, a linor, By ’ + ’ “ierk of the Superior Court. ee ct o c ma * > 3 + + D a D - oD ey @o ct = c _ oO ~ ~~ a D od c fH. @ C ~~ @ ~ 5 c+ Ke D Q 4 ‘ > o oO c ~~ 2. Im Ic ic: t : t i= [43 _—< Vs " v ° ee ie $ yy 4 “Oat ie ca s to his best IntTEresve rt UY = | ) We on. , } 2 ) i ) £¢ ymneh fen yy X = ‘ “395 , am ‘ oi oe e . 5 toahw your 4 t, Clifford Bunch, VJelendant. l ai entered in Statesville, North Caroline, this February 6th, 7 $ 4 entere a — } - at 1 50. . : ‘ ~ te ans ¢ +} lanvnary TT " Og o ry This cause coming on to be neard at the dvanuary ern, 1950, ol tae : I ybbitt i; sIle e O yLUL Hh a As nt ; ‘ r y aoa a ,4 ’ } nat “ sco a 73 J : 1 > I : rf lredell County superior Court, before His “onor, .ililam ne Bobbitt, Judge Presid. Ne Et * ‘ er inna % ‘ 1 ths »< ef + — tac rm #ehnai a 411reW¢We hat > ‘ oes ab ing, anc being heard by consent of tie parties without a jury; that the cause was ) * ode men om te ~ 1 7 » . haA+ » yt 4 . wer sn “~ —~>% : + " } a leard upon statements of counsel for both parties, and evidence submitted to the ' : . it f t} ‘ > ] Ter . y scl hur 5 ; y ‘ye AM : } ; - AAypa + + 7 . + Whe } " 7 Ai ,0urt { Qusy t1c0ensea rnyel Co tly A201 Mien 1% C ie tne Court tnat th mer . teelman 1 . - ‘* as8 .. ——o sy " Y. clmer -teelman, ext Friend wf . y ~ * ~ s ~ we } ly ‘ JT mor linorx ( in e wteelniar ten years of ( ; iis Next Friend ie wilmer oteelman ’ ’ , 9 “2 ? ! i — ei ‘ cee ; eee eee si era : ria CC | L Citute U : C1i0Nn v ra C i@ Sustained oecause O21 njuries eA » + 2intiLt wv = - rec ved Wnen @ vicycle Wuicn ne Ss i : n tomobile belon; ins to th Be ae s snberry adams, Je°rnal nated es scien : ttorney r the Jele nt ; ie i a ‘ , 7 attorney I | Jerendant, wt. vlitiord Cil, re 2 ived i co! sion on t vali iry oad i 4 ie ace eee ; po 4 , : 1 Sereet ' 2 G 2 i € Uw u OL , inver CULO! 4 Vili Lif + ay mwoad iQ st road otree HY} . . 7 : + +r + + * + * 7 “— “ne + LI \ € ai Uy 1 Iv & ’ bvwese VGIUAL ’ n vune U, J 5 and Ly : f Aarons LO ae ae aad + ‘ n+ 5 + - ) y e the Court t ntiff a ef > have agreed upon the settlement of all } ° ’ > s22'e + y + y + - —- . P } t tter things ear It of t J ed injuries set forth in the! intiai's ’ nt + + opr 1 > . : - . ehteer r 20M Nv, 5 u LePrhic aS uv f i u MAS reed to y the sum i‘ slg ntee e & ‘al a . oy ot . . “aa — 1 \ 3 49 , 7 ‘ = as In the 3 rio% rt 1 mal /0 re Lo ptoUV es) in t ttlemt of the minor' alleged rt I Lt) : 4 - | 7 : «<n tan ( . . + y + 4 o + + ets Irede tor Wary Sa ’ é ] . 1I ? \ i a Vid € U¢ , 1 & CUsOnie eT - ’ . nee . »* . : ° ° WONe . r mn oh Za ’ ay ar UY t LI PATe@LULLY examined tne YY é r;AO ) t ec e, r ; hutton -~ roonials om —iny | ; 2 e once in the c } J ) : a t ‘ \ t S € t Y 17 ar . s : ¢ +o u 7, * » » “ r i re t 1 r s tre ed, . } i + 8 ‘ + y +n + — 4 + 4 o . 4 roly * es * } . 1 - ss . ¥ etl ru tat tre rents of tne cnild are reiy iie@ Ki 1 ’ Lizabdetn sampor at : : + af 4 4 + { + + ’ ’ : + j s . . icles —* wwe v Vict Ue f. Us. ..eade avis Hospital, -tavesye imbro ther 2 | : iby . Y : rt ro] 0 reste r fp + \ ’ wre) lett ’ ‘ b. oe dd ait y - £ an » — ¢ e 14 " tv ’ treated hin, i tna inion tnat the minor has made exce- /Onnie fk, jicer obert Spicer | C : pac | recovery, considcerins the ext > wed setenaen ° i ot ‘ — a . +. that i eVUlisd Sb ddd Vil€ ,€ T + + +H 4 e «eo on te ewate Y hay . "7 oe vure o1 vVil€ injuries wnicn ne susv ined, » 7 tnet ££ ~ ™ + a + yr Y I i . ~ “a + ebted to ti UL ts fter fully incuiryv into the matter ¢} : : a ai t amount, Ys re tue dei 4ants 1 f eaheMary 2nvo ene matter, the Court enters the followins decree: & ‘ 1 m sy 17 + 1 ; +2 fr ‘T reg 1 eY ) ~ i L A Li Le 117 “On °or r C ‘ = zi md . a . . CU PLlalintill recover f the Defendant the sum of Sighteen Hunaree ’ 1 iss ) ‘ - ' Oo rs L b the $ as ‘ . «of oe zi : roe ee : : efendant into the Office of the Clerk of t® erior 1O1 rt c ced ] Jour ti wb te ’ ea " ‘ Ney, rth rolina. aie e : utili « That out of the funde naid «a hs ; ’ ide , eMnes paid to him, the Clerk shall pay to the Davis se Hospital for the hosnital +t id a a . ail spit tne coctor's services, the sum of Three Hundred Forty-5i* 1 hn pe { 5) mn \ 1 . JO1 BOYS LO »\ . £6 thse norte : ‘ ' G \'p2& 45 v vae inor's mother me . ou: y 7 r= two a s ier, Mrs. W. E. Steelman, the sum of Forty Dollars (342.00), to reimburse her ¢f er + £ iit oS ef Lor loss of time}; to b ie lignor's father, Vie le rl Steelman, the sum of forty-five Dollars (545 6! : Pen i nursing vs e Vollars +5000) for hospital, medicine, and nu a enditur es made hi 1 to re m I ' a OY ) A Hin J 410 ad A e , wal nino © Ltor ney 9 c 4 M. Simons, the sum of tre y TH ‘ hasad seer, “ITP TM riled vi Todud " 4niS honorable Court takes a rece 1 150 at 7°30) He Big uP RIOR COURT e-- JANUARY TERM,1950 Monday, February ca ww 6th, 1950 in the Superior Court January Term, 1950 until Tuesday i.orning, February 7th, ™ Ht Aid Judge aa” ae —_ —— » IN THE SUPERIOR COUR’ SECOND WEEK e--- JANUARY TER}, 1950 Tuesday, February 7thn,1950 This Honorable gourt convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday lorning by February 7th,195 0 Wo. 4606 Mattie Uvercash ceCall { lace: sy her next friend, ; | Wl vit . : i rR - Overcasn [he Divorce Jury ;1" being duly sworn empanelled answers the i as follows: } oe issues submitted the plantiff a the Court : ant a child, William Allen i.cCal 1d custody of said child; and it Lurtner ring nd the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable ve the custody and control of the minor child, William Allen licCall, best interest of said minor would serve by being in the custody of she being found to be a fit person for the custody of said minor. therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of Ratrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the tg re hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce “Ton the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plgintiff, Pattie verc: : ’ Cash, be and she is hereby awarded full and complete care,custody and 3UPaR1UR COURT eo TIUARY THERM, 19: Tuesday, February 7th,1950 dam Allen hicCalle U at relates t Wie [le : Judge presiding neither the + a) te 1 7 y ovuner on ~* COoSsU vO: Land, na Pere ee) Avery avery wOowers LN » vowers dams, Jearman & winberry Adaiis, Jearman & Winberry Attorneys for the Plaintiff HeLaus hiin John R. lcLaugil Battle e custody of the minor Child, H. Bobbitt a counterec fF nor }) inti the matters account of action. of this a um, H. Bobbitt Juare Presiaing mon T itt ray crn Woin ee iW I iC Ui iD SUPERLOR COURT JANUARY TERI aa” 50 0 Tuesday, February 7th,19 1 CARULINA ? ; ’ ea a TIRED SLL YOUN TI. tk a4 Niynch prs, fataeri e Buncn, Plaintiff, | VSe 1) I White, Defendant aku use coming on to be fe iia Term, U . ATIpSD nmi OUI tN ryt 4 Dolls. y JANu 1 Y sesh = 1 before iredel] 50 ued “9 a 3 h,1950 he I y 7t riot COUR tY Da 2% mm fy cat OO > -< os S zy< he D4" > .O — @ mn) 8 &, i : =] a” mM 4 gfx} ro == 2 ® oS =e a " > te fx} 1950 6 T UU ” ’ UARY TER. ry 7ta, 195 Th dA a nou S mii Lut 1] )U HE 3 K a= T var Wily } a IN fuesd: ;CUND r . Is {ror ~ uri aring to © Lointiff eland Cc Lev J+ 7) oJ y; Febru , 2 ; . 7 .™ 3 > > = 5 oO > 4 69 s cs oO od w 4> om © os "a > > i G4 (2 42 oO 4 Oo « > > o-4 3 Van te s0ns re Va —— ~~ = oe - pe eee 6 eee + IN THE SUPERIOR COURT — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ee=- JANUARY TERM 1950 5 SECOND WEEK -- JANUARY T ERM, 19 50 Tuesday, Feburary ‘7th, 1950 Wednesday, February éth 51950 Tyis Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on 5 W ¢ vw , ) jeanesday |.orning, February 6th, 1950. NOe Lolk NORTH CAROLINA san one’ WALTINTV TREDELL UU UNid aibis Besil J. t.orse We V5Se Sroucl lly 4 ic xie cont any ', Huffman ee Ta aR i ace as n ane ea acreed efendant, undersigned Judge Iredell County, and fact tha hence ° lerrees iately South of ner former southwest corner. - ' RE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the intiff p: - ee a yeant, the : a vv - -O% - exce t “ Pile iff 3 . pf ; . > f * nD read : rene ‘ eo have and recover of tiie defendants the sum of 4500.0 and the cost ¢ teal ‘ i o e oa An 7 ss ees 7 1 } ee ee ang? texed by the Clerk against the defendants, and that the recover nothing further. Bobbitt. as tESIDING im. H. Bobbitt Judge prostitne ce “@ Consent: eo oowers & avery . v¢c ——~< Wwié £ gia n S \¢ } . ’ rneys tor the plainti — Lewis, & iedrick Hikers, Smathers & Carpenter r . > C avvorneyvs f a ; Jefemdants. } or Plaintiff owers & Avery ‘ourt takes eys for Defendants A ik 2» a I ece ss . P ; i h 5S until /sednesday l.orning, February 8th, Turlington ‘ttorneys for Defendants Basil NH but to Pratap porse JOON PRESIDING 1940 at 9: 35° Honorable court. take Ms Bie BK BE OE 35 DK 3K BK OK N We SUPERLO: OUR T i SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, $950 M Thursday 9th, 1950 iN THE SUPERLOR COURT SECUND. WEEK #--_JANUARY TER 1950 Thursday, February 9th, 1950 v a ams ij i | This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday lursda Barkley vs. hae L. Barkley, ----- Continued for the Jefendant i s oe . i : es n nm : srning, February 9, 1950. “No, b707~ the Ve h i : i f _ " eat ocet 1 as ’ ’ rtimuwan £ a Dina son } Pa L7h2- doxie T Lazenby vs, otatesviiie ineatre LOrp,---= 2ontinued for the rlaintilLi be ee F NWOoe +! ‘9, 4752 fred H Benfield vs. #.. Beaver, --- Jontinued vs. Hiarman Gillespie et al, ------- vontinued J < . $ + + ~- " 4 - se 770- © C Johnston et tN SND WU Sato COURT W Allen Brown vs Foy Brittain, et al - ---- Contirued + L667 Rimmer's Inc. vs T C Bosher Jre = - - = = Continued Bore logers Jury sworn and empanelled: lhorris G hnst s. ft afin chee a. fF . males Ge Johnston, hrs, des 4710e C 8B Myers et al vs DO Cowan Jr. et al -- Continued re sey, + rss we Bis ALECAZaNGECT » ve P. nOOUOS, Re ce Nee! laintiff Fred Sherrill, T. &. licNeely, F. D. Thompson avid ws : 1 36 _ . aaa ’ - an 2 ? * ° the ao. 1, YaAVId ie xo = : \711- cB Myers et al vs W B Crowaon, et al ae Continued in) Le JUN,» ve + ia@ITiosgm am ve e nagzer,. } % ~ Piedmont Lumber & Mfg Co vs C M Stanley et al-- Contirued . W749 ; ran) ON ct Si a aA 5g igs ila DS S) Ic: a 2 ted ) Fred Benfield vs R M Beaver, - - --- - - = = = Continued Albert Gibbs vs Marie Gibbs - - e--- <- - - = Cont‘rued w H Roseman et al vs D L Raymer, et al -- = = Continued | an western Textile Cé vs G & M Motor Transfer Co- Continued ke Ralph Stroud vs The J k Watkins Co. ---- Continued fh hi i . fat amount, ii any, is tie plaintiff entitled to recover of the to be heard * me ie nate Se 142. es ahi et . i elore nonorabie william he DODLAVY, yy 2 na the jury vine »: . Pe i f nor ’ ‘ y 4aVvin nswerea t e issues of nhef4+-+ a O01 n . ah & ita! Be / +5, Clee’ : 44NSG Cue pLainvuida + : 4 . AvViiaAW u Tre Y°¢ . ‘ ; ’ LOY ruere iju } } if 3 3) ad i-ed } ras (+ ~ . nlat j ’ a na aecreed that the plain This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday liorning, sebruary 10th, NOH Got -_ * ew4y IN THE oe eas a een ne SECOND wood Friday, February 10th, 1950 SUPERIOR COURT ent on Friday one mee MADAT TN RTH GA ash @ answers: = defendant's 16 recor ncillary Proceedings af Pplied for and obta3 Piled for and obtained Dr a uk on to <r) POV f lotion ao wis, oY J JUrder TOR COURT J ; February 10th v7 ww ube wR 4 foi 192 gms wupe Notice consent, the an action commenced July 8, 1949, by th Jelivery, 2xtending the July 21 & 9 a 1 1 » 1949, all as appears upon the fact of the record herein. ssuance of Sumnons at which time the plaintiff time for filing Complaint to IN THE SUPERTOR COURT IN THE SUPSRIOR COURT Tl ERLOR COURT SECOND WEEK see JANUARY TERI, 1950 SECOND WEEK ---JANUARY TERI,1950 50 Friday, sebru arylO0th, 1950 45 Friday, February 10th, 19 ss } ere Seer ee ae ee ee ee, ee ere . — al Invilid filed his sOnmpt 1int, togetner Wien | copy thereof, vith & Noe 4790 she Clerk of the court of Iredell County, N rth Carolina on - 10. Je ce ae TH TUL SUPSRTOR AOURT I O G OL v Vy 40 4 LTh July 1S ’ 1949, and NORTH CAROLINA IN TH OUPERLOR COURT iv a 1 yarm pene aes a ot te a i ere Bias TREDE OUNTY reafter no action was taker y the plaintifi or by the Clerk of the Superior IREDELL ¥ fourt wit! f 50 . n. C. Howard i i curt with reference to the service of such copy upon the defendant herein aes Plaintiff | + ale i _- h m i urust J 191.9, the de ‘endant throuch Jd GS. Lewis, Sc hi Vs. | JUDG) NT 1 I | ne LSC. nis ttorney, filed herein 2 "lotion and Notice to Jismiss the action", a copy of y. C. Bell, Carroll bell and v.B, Bell, ts trading and doing business under the nartnership name of . ©. Bell and sons a} saar _ ~ + on ’ a 2 PP oa 7 fs ch was served upon the plaintiff on august lL 29. as apvears fromt t 9 ~747%9 oY G} Cars Lrom tre re a i ome Defendants * was This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before llis Nonor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding at the January tern, 1950 of the Superior Iredell Jistrict of & Sounty, North Carolina of the vifteenth Judicial ee ———— + > ct oO } r ct C r+ i c o o 2 ct rare + 3 D 2. F C s > > ct 5 ~~ oO nm =) ct > e) pan . : = = om : i n 7 = = ” _ ne 7 - ~ ~< ome . 2 iayvy or +) Tart, \f ' L Gay Or So tUneree yvourvl V4 : ‘ 4 3s 1 o } - £ + the State ol North Carolina, upon tne vemurrer of the defendants as set lortn ’ Deh co CY - 4 nn = i . - = . .. r" Lan ee ae ¥ atin ,fo + he al : ’ ana _ ’ os a My tek u GU ve We LE Sy So. ” represented the in saic Jemurrer, and upon tne Mottion of tne Hlaincii. GO Oe lLlowed to ena 3 i 44 val eo , - . _. ° a ™ ss es ae . Sa s : 2 i their pleadings, all as set forth in said pleadings. «nd the vourt veing of . : : aa 3 - . y ; u ) -utior re +t act bevy -~ Sas 1s tad vs a ai _ £ +} 4 ff o} 7a h ot Aaa ama 4 ‘ Lie - . ? utTLON OL Tie aele nt's Undertaking of the Clain the opinion th 1t the amendment of tne } 1 intiis shoulc be allowed and in his al 14 ; giseretion allow tne said amendment of the plaintiff. said amendiment being P| ivery proceedinr, mat the conv of ¢) Cau eaee ee a : ron 4 btieee : -s ae — e 4) nd aa : a V cea, bm i the copy of the Conplaint left with him to Mr.Lewis set forth as filed with tne vourt, id the Cour yeir of the opinion tat oe : 7 1 t + ’ noion »% 1) — “a? ’ : e said Jemurrer } Laint @6 amended shoula oe overe!l uled. 1 J sr +t : : a 1? 3 wi ¢ aa ts ; and aanmaad * _ + ne sffte : e ns Ls A y Uv ei a erein other t n is ator ag 4S O8¢ lered, 2 Ua ea na aecreea Uli t tae plainviii’s i = + . 1 - ; . _ x, 1 or ‘ + , : ‘ 1 t] Notion to anena Sas nt be allowed and the same is allowed, ana wit id } : ? 229 + Y ~ AY 7 3 ae « "rl 1} }, and + s¢ a to 1 l GL ction", Demurrer iiled by ants to the complaint s amended be anda tne me 1S : hereby over-ruled. And tne defendants allowed thirty days in whica to tiie on Answer. Bunch Funeral lIiome { en in ne t 4 " ‘ . V ’ ~Uiv r novice Nive Jeofendont fem a .4 } tay ays 60 ay ; <* ° fendent is sllowed sixty days t0 Hillary Tillotson | pu rve his ense on eal sities er . ae ve e. | Zs2282 ’ = ss i - meee 4 le lowed Sixty ye taere M, Fi Gs itt er ' fter t rye cow . i v I e o . - Ld f A +5 AY - we Ulli e ae Ye a . ~— " - . . . » 4 : 4 On the recular call of the calendar, ib was le to 3} r wi vOuUTL that + ra) i : ‘72 24 ee L. a _— 23 oA _ on “1a Pf & hy that the defendant, Hillary Tillotson naa been duly notified in an Uraer of wi tt: ‘ e was peremptorily set tor tri tne sum of 31 a ee, ae the Nov. Term, 1949, that tne above cat filed” term of court, on the 6th day of February,?. sailed to } ; ‘ Ge ang - lpto } + a’) Gsm vie aeleiliu inv a: aah » +a +} Yay: - ‘ a+ » | Ie r vO Lie ,OUre Waki Vv vie navine been further made to i Ihh4 + : 6 JOD to - aopear e j 2 & Oe i The TTT wt anata ms44 oo |. ee av — « ay aa’ 43 ! r lea 4 t MG mwVbu d , int UI Unio Us Ine sala t1iiotson sent a telegram to Judze Frank Iie Armstron; "" and Js Ke ones ee ’ en memh ad : 1 + - ’ i Ticcual ates niain 4 rk ‘ ‘ La ISTRICT. member of the law firm of Burke & Burke, criticizing tue Sala ue ie Ss t i urKe vist AU ve Ss “A appearing taat e : . counsel, due to the fact that ae isfactory, and tue said wd marge ement of the said cause, and it further hovitied the said Tillotson to employ other Claimed that his handling of the matter was tot sat YL H. Burke, for 1% S asks that his said firm be at she reasons referred to, now mitted to withdraw from the case: j & e Ss r v s AWVsaw and they are hereby jnued until tne , IS THERES ORDERED that the said Attorneys 6 f t J the first contested a4 iw LH satib Ost 4 J ] J ry . and the cause is ermitted to withdraw from the said case, fext term of this court, and is set peremptorily for trial as ) he aneeeee civil case at the larch term, 1950 of this court, and the said defendant is nohals and directed to employ other counsel and that ne be present on tne lth day of . and the Clerk varch, 1950 at the trial of the said cause if he desires to do so, ST ais iat of the Court is hereby directed to mail a copy of This Order to the said Hillary ‘Allotson by registered mail, with the request for a return receipt. This the 6th day of February,1950. oe y ' Wm, He Bobbitt JUDGE PasOLVING 1. ’ ~~ n iron & on n tr ale bal » Ormer’s ’ t Neo vinecnce ‘ #1 Waal e GC Louth 7] ence feet Y wi Line et es asne 5 e 1/2 t ny . ° wes 9 wd a 2 + Rs eal = Y has vW Fé. rive and runs then Jest side of Pecan : @) rith - thence wit st side of Pecan. iru. wy wv st 101 feet to an feet to the beg+™ i lest $* ind it comienced in a q by law, name. appearing on We extens the superior ae J time OW very hé vin fecovered in aid amount mo c © t & v a to the court a) ~ for months t ha u is therefore, h ct Lan + Ua ved for Judg No : 1e pla ment certified oro further appearing to inSw by default erty the Une 2 ° cS — ct ~ - Pods ve OL page Te ee has been s been gr nurou “h fin: laint m aul lescribed it c 2 Lia the + I id action was he time premitted nad 2% Land, > 4 urther VOWwe rs sum certein to be . a4 + apLAaInNe g re “os e ylerk to and from | + hye Uilk iec] No. 4719 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk, H. E. Roseman Vs. JUDGMENT OF NON»SUIT hie F. Gaither This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Cle of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non-suit in this action: It is therefore, ordered am adjudged by the Court that this cause be ani tk same is hereby nonesuited and dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, This February 17th, 1950. C. Ge. Smith erk Superior Court, drede. County, North Carolina, Agreed to: H. E, Roseman. Plaintitt. Me rik ric aie she she aie ae ae she ale ake akc afc aie 2}< aie nic aie afc a} af ais ais 2]c aie ais ais afc ake af NO. 4827 North C lina rth Carolin Inthe Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk. We. C. Mayhew Vs. JUDGHENT OF NON-SUIT James A, Summers This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superi Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of tlk plaintiff's attorneys that the plaintiff and defendant have settled aql matters ane things in controversy between them and that the plaintiff has elected to take 4 nonguit in this action; it is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuite and taxed with the costs to be charged by t he Clerk, This February 21st, 1950, a ae Smith eee erkSuperior vo Consented to: Scott & Collier ttorneys for the F nt PEAK HE HE IE 36 Bs BE IE 2 ae Be DIC ae OY afc ae ale aie ale ale ae aie ale aie o,c ae 9 io. 1,688 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County prank Harris, et al. Plaintiffs JUDGMENT Vs. a yooresville Co-operative Creamery, INCe This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable UG, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the . e , Court that the plaintiffs have elected to take a non suit in the above entitled action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiffs be voluntarily non suited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 24th day of February, 1950. Cc. G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court Consented to: Woodhouse & \\ard foodhouse & Ward, Attorneys for the plaintiffs. Bie BR MS OKIE BE CIS IE AS AK AE EK NO. 4747 HE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPER IREDELL COUNTY Inez W. Comer | Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT &. We. McBride, nee Annabelle | 1 Ralph W. McBride and Mrs. i Py McBride | Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable °. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Cofnty, and it appearing to the Court fromthe statements of Counsel for both parties that all matters of eed upon by the parties, and ter ordered to the Controversy set out in the pleadings hawe been agr that the defendants have agreed to pay in the manner hereinaf plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept in the manner hereinafter ordered the sum of $400.00 and the costs of this action in full accord and Satisfaction t hereof; The sum of $400.00 is tobe paid to the Peoples Loan & Savings Bank to be applied by said Bank upon the note in the sum of $400.00 signed by the plaintire as maker and indorsed by the defendants. In the event that said note has been pre- viously paid by the plaintiff then the defendants shall pay said sum directly to the plaintiff; Now, therefore, by consent, it ig ordered, adjudged, and decreed that th plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of $400.00 to be paid as outlin above and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This 44th day of February, 1950. C. G. Smith Clerk of the Superfor Court Consent: Woodhouse & Ward Woodhouse & ward, attorneys Tor” woodnouse & ard, attorneys for the plaintiff, Je G. Lewis J. G. Lewis, Attorney for the Defendant, NO. 4741 NORTH CAROLINA . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Je Le Travis, Jr, Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT ay Burl L. Gatton Defendant | Th 3 oil is cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C Ge Clerk of S of thé Superior Court of lredell County, and it appearing to the Court that te laintiff h: P has elected to take a non-suit in the above entitled action; It is, t » therefore, ordered, adjudged » and decreed that the plaintiff be voluntaril - ar’*y non-suited and that he be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk: This 2hthday of February,1950, C. G, Smith erk 0 @ Superior vour Consented to: Woodhouse & Attorneys for the plaintiff ~~ MOTE He Hee MR ae se ae se ae ae ae ae ae Vee ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ae ate age ae af NOe L794 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY garl Gilleland individually and T/A Shelton Avenue Garage Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. Carl Bynum, Jr. Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable ¢, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff have elected to take a non-suit in this action: lt is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be non-suited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 24th day of February,1950. G. Smith Stork a the Superior Court Consented to : Woodhouse & Ward ech Woodhouse & Ward, Attomeys for the Plaintiff, FOIE (OOOO a ag Cai leak ake ake ak af. fe a ae a ge ake a ae ae ae RE aa a ae No, 4616 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. William W. Dunn Vs. | | Vance Elbert Helms, ! W. F. Morris JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superi¢ | Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs and th defendants have adjusted and settled the matters and things existing between then and that the defendants have paid off the entire agreed amount and are no longer indebted in any amountto the plaintiffs. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the action be, am the same is hereby dismissed. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Lewis, Lewis & Hedrick R, A. Hedrick By R. A. Hedrick eae Ba a a a ae a ae ae aa ae ae ae a ai ae ae a NO. 4818 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Dillon Supply Company Vs. JUDGMENT ©, L. Sparks and “rs. S.L.Sparks | This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk Superi@ Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the action was comment on the 27th day of January, 1950 by the filing of verified complaint. {t furtie! appears to the court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the aid! of $3664.64 with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from October pth, 1949 until paid, It further appears to the court that the note is secured by chattel mortgage which is duly recorded in Chattel Mortgage Book 200 at page 2h?) records of Iredell County, N. C. It further appears to the court that summons was served on the 27th dat * January, 1960 and that more than 30 days have elapsed and that the defendants ha" failed to answer or file any pleadings in this cause and that plaintiff is entitit! to judgment by default final against the defendants It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $3664.64 with interest from October 25th, 1949 at 6% per annum, aid that the said judgment is a specific lien upon the following described property: One 250 H. P. Used Locomotive Boiler= Serial #3171 One 175 H. P. Used Skinner Steam Engine- Serial #8652 One 30% x 60" Type E American Blower with LS Wheel arrangement IA. It is further adjudged shat the defendants pay the costs of this action. Thats the lst day of march, C. G. Smith Tlierk Superior Court aie ac HC IIS 2S 25 BRE OK dic Bh MK ac Dis Be IE IK IK AK AE BED DIC DIC A BK IK BC DC B]s Ds IC AE 7S Ie dix de d}¢ 2)< NO. 4815 North Carolina the Superior Court Iredell County Auto Parts and Electric Company Vs. J. B. Winkler and Fred A. Winkler This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superian Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that this action was instituted on the 2lst day of January, 1950, and that the plaintiff filed its verified complaint in this court on said date, and that summons and complaint was issued and served upon the defendant on the 28th day of January, 1950. It further appears to the court that the action is based upon a note and chattel mortgage given by the defendants and now owned by the plaintiff. It further appears fo the court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $204.00 with interest from the 16th day of March, 1946 until paid, and that plaintiff has ib its possession a 1g h. P. Compressor, 4 National Antgit eco welding torch, a Black and Decke# Sander, air hose and fittings and air regulator. it further appears to the court that the defendants have failed to answer the complaint in this cause and that time for answering has elapsed. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $204.00 with interest from the 16th day of March, 1948, Until paid, and that this judgment is declarad a specific and perferred lien upon the compressor, welding unit, sander, air hose gnd regulator, and in order to Satisfy the judgment and costs of this action Robert A. Collier is appointed a Commissioner of this court and is directed to advertise the aforesaid property and Sell the same at public auction at the courthouse door after giving twenty days notice prior to the holding of said sale, and out of the proceeds of Said’ sale he shall satisfy the judgment and costs and if there is any excess it is to ty paid into this court for the benefit of the defendants. This the lst day of March, 1950. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court MEDIC BIS 2S BK IIS DIK PI 2K 215 31S Hie Bie aie dig aIC 24S Dk DS DIK AIC BS 24S IE BIC IIE 34S 25 I} Dik dic DI D/C d)< 2\< 2\< 2)< No. 4069 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the clerk Hilary P. Tillotson | Vs j JUDGI.ENT bee r. Gaither | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersig# Clerk Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has file a motion asking that this action be dismissed; It is, therefore, upon motion of plaintiff, ordered and adjudged byt Court that the action be and same is hereby dismissed and plaintiff taxed witht costs. This the day of July, 1949. C. G. Smith FREI 2 OR BH RS Se 22 IH Se He Re ee ae eae ae a Me ae Ne Re Bee ae a ae a a NO. 4792 Worth Barolina. In the Superior Court Iredell County. Before theClerk peter A. Bernackig | Plaintiff, { Vs. ! JUDGMENT GC. & M. Motor Transfer Company, | Incorporated, ; Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon motion by the Plaintiff, for judgment against the Defendant by default fina; and it appearing to the Court that a verified Complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on November 22, 1949; And it further appearing to the Court that the summons, together with a copy of the Complaint, was served on the Defendant on November 23, 1949; And it further appearing to the Court that no answer; demurrer, or other pleadings have been filed by the Defentant, and no extension of time to file plead- ings has been granted and that the time within which pleadin:;s may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the Court from the verified Complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of two express contracts to pay sums of money fixed by the contracts, mamely, on the first contract, the sum of Twenty-sk Hundred Fifty Dollars ($2650.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent (64) per annum from December 31, 1948; on the second contract, the sum of ive Hundred Thirty-four Dollars and Ninet@-four Cents ($534.94), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent (6%) per annum from December 31, 194,83 Now, therefore, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREEB that the Plaintiff have and recover of the Defendant the sum of Thirty-one Hundred Eighty-four Dollars and Ninety-four Cents ($3184.94), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 31, 1948, and the costs of this action. This March 10, 1950, C. G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County Se see ste ae ae ste ae se ae ae ae ae ae a eae ea a a EB a a CR a A 2 2 EE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Monday March 13, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1950 Be it repembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid on the 13th day of March, 1950 at 10:00 0\.clock A. Me when and where His Honor Wm. H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding and Holding courts for the Fifteenth Judicial District March Term, 1950, is presemt and presiding. After call of the calendar the first day (Monday) was taken up with pre-trial hearings. No cases for trial by jury were set for hearing until Tuesday. No. 4770 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1950. C. C. Johnston and \. L, Johnston, Jr., Trading as Neel's Grocery Store Plaintiffs, Ve. PRE@THIAL ORDER. Harmon Gillespie and J. will Brown, Trading, as Gillespie & Brown, | Defendants. Appearances: William kt, Pope, Esq., for plaintiffs. Grant Bolmer, “sq., for defendants. It is stipulated: l. The plaintiffs, C. C. Johnston and W, C. Johnston, Jr., trading under the name of Neel's Grocery Store, were, at the times referred to in the complaint, the owners and operators of a grocery store in the Town of Mooresville, N.C, 2. the defendants, Harmon Gillespie and J. Will Brown, trading under the name of Gillespie & Brown, were at the times mentioned in the complaint, the owners of certain cafe equipment located in the Spic and Span Cafe in the Town of Mooresville, N. C.; and at the times mentioned in the complaint the said equipment was leased by the defendants to Mrs. G, E, Cooley, the then operator of said cafe, under a rental arrangement whereby the defendants received 1,0 of the profits derived from the operation of said cafe business as rental for the use of the cafe equipment. 3. After the account alleged to have been agreed upon in the amount of $286.16 is alleged to have been struck and determined, a payment of $25.00 \ Fi SUPERLUN UUr FIRST WEEK --- MARCH TERM 1950 monday, March 13, 1950. on account thereof has been wceived by the plaintiffs. Subject to re-consideration at the trial, the Court settles the issues as follows: 1. Did the plaintiffs furnish and deliver the groceries in question to urs. Ge E. Cooley upon the credit of the defendants and pursuant to an agreement that the defendants would pay for groceries so furnished and delivered, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: 2. Did the plaintiffs and the defendants, after groceries were furnished) the plaintiffs, to urs. Cooley, agree that the amount due the plaintiffs on account of such groceries wes $_____, aS alleged in the complaint? Answer: The Court in its discretion permits the plaintiffs to amend Paragraph | of their complaint by alleging tn lieu of Paragrpah 4 as now written, that on or about September 27, 1948, the plaintiffs and the defendants entered into an agree- ment that the amount due and owing to the plaintiffs on xcoumt of groceries furnishi mrs. Cooley was $_ . —_—-- this the 13th day of march, 1950. Wn. H. Bobbitt Judge Tresiding. NE AE DIK DYE 2) 2S BYE BE OK Bk IR AK 2K BK 3 3K NO. 4691 pe © Snes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. ARCH TERM, 1950 aad “hy ° lie Me Warren Plaintiff, PRE®TRIAL ORDER, Harry Howard, Defendant. | { Vs. i 4 | w, RK, Battley, Esq., for the Plaintiff Grant Bolmer, Esq., for the defendant. It is stipulated: 1. The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff furnished the materials and the plaintiff furnished the labor in the remodeling of a residence ownedby the defendant, the plaintiff to receive $600.00 in payment for his services under said remodeling contract. Subject to re-consideration at the trial, the Court settles the issues 4 follows: IN THE SUPERIOR_COURT “MARCH T ERM,1950 jionday, march 13th,1950 1. Did the plaintiff perform extra service for the defendant over ai above what was required of him under the original contract, as alleged by the plaintiff? Answer: 2. In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: This the 13th day of March, 1950. Mm - H. Bobbitt “Judge Presiding This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, March 14th, 1950 at 9:30 O'Clock, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Tuesday, march 14th,1950 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ood naeHaBeRNS OaEE™ convenes OO enenbenedbotinet: mcdupenier Cauntcbegancemdctmedd ism sna Bown tine gtatexandQnenypoef oressibpcomn tinedktinabaypcef . Nanensx 196 Oooh... whemcandcrhers irs xdtemorpwickbiencbx Bobbitt badge keemiding eanx HOLME Cmte ef the: PE teenth duckiciakxBiskriek narenxPermyxi PhOyxisxpresentxandxpresiding. W. D. morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this the March Tern, 19h@, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: R. G. Collins Weaver F. Hinson A. L. Lowrance Be o, Jackins urs, Vra 7. Reavis M, A. Bell R. L. miller F. C. icAuley Paul Feimster Farrell W. Ostwalt Robert F,. Hicks L. Young White John Harold Parks irs. +. A. Nash Charlie Adkins ups. Sarah D. Parker 249 H. Deaton Walter L Tillery R, C. Lawson iss wary A. Cashwell Roy MeNeely C. C. McNeely Herbert Morrison C. w,. Connor brs. T. A. Nash, mrs. Ora T. Reavis and C. W. Connor were execused on Doctor's Certificates. urs oaran D. Parker was execused by statute. voy M. bicNeely was out of the county. The following men constitutes what shall hereinafter be termed as the Divore ry . Sao wrt $. ° r : 4 ’ , Jivorce Jury 1, to-wit: R. E. Jackins, F. C. McAuley, R. C. Lawson, Paul Feimste, L. Young whi vharlie Adkins m H i : * & white, charlie Adkins, sam H. Deaton, iiss Mary A. Cashwell, Herbert mort. R. G. Collins, . A. Bell and R. L. miller, No. 4757 Flossie inae Miller DI VORCE The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled Vs. | answers the issues submitted to it as follows: gohn Wesley Hiller | NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TER!., 1950 Flossie Mae iiller Vs. John Wesley Miller (1 1 . D ; ‘ id the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the answer. Yes Complaint? 2 . H C i P more than six Souths wane pecee been a resident of the state of North Carolina !™ preceding the filing of the complaint in this action? Answer, Yes 3. Did the defendant separate from and apart for a period of two years or more Rig plaintiff and have they Lived 7 alleged in the Complaint? Answer, Yes, according to a ARGH SH sort 9 Mhesday Morning, Mars: 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Tueaday, march 14th, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY March Term, 1950. Flossie “ae Miller ‘ JUDGMENT Se John wesley Willer This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the march Tern, 1950 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all theissues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the reoord; and it appearing to the Court that there was born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant a child, Johnny West Miller, and that tne plaintiff herein has the care aud custody of said child; and it further appear- ing to the Court and the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the minor child, Johnny West Miller, and that the best interest of said minor would serve by being in the custody of his mother, she being found to be a fit person for the custody of said minor. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of uatrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Flossie mae iller, oe and she is hereby awarded full and complete care,custody and control of the minor child, Johnny West “iller. This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, is retained for further orders. This the 14th day of march, 1950. Wm. H. Bobbitt _ Judge Presiding ape se aa a 2 a a a i RC 2 BE RE A A BR EE BP ite 0 Sr ee BPD RE. as ee Si eS Ro SS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT wARCH TERM, 1950 In the Superior Court Tuesday, March 14th, 1950 MARCH TERM, 1950 Tuesday, March 14th, 1950 il) No. 4209 “No. 4812 Ee Hi a . a Bertie S. Stallings | Wilburn C. Caudle, Z a HH | DIVORCE Plaintiff DIVORCE 1 ii , f j yyw Hii. Vs. The Divorce Jury #1", being dul The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn ard 1 Hii: | amas ths Lebene euebacat >. it’ as Tole Lk Vs. | empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as 1 ih A Robert William Stallings ; a | follows: ‘i Whe Frances A. Caudle ih Hl 1 : NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT defendant. : {ie wa IREDELL COUNTY. Bi | i . . NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COUER tt AH Bertie 5. Stallings IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 1950. a } - a mm @ p i} hia Vs. } ISSUES Po H iB ==--+-->— Wilburn C Caudle | a nr i 2 Lb De a 4 Robert William Stallings Vs. 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state of North Carolina for Frances A. Claude more than six months next preceding the institution of this action? Defendant oc lat EE Answer. Yes (1) Were the plaintiff and the defendant married to each other as nea Es 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint: : alleged in the complaint‘ Answer. Yes 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated,and have they lived separ aa Tee. : ah i (2) Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart i and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this acticr! from each other for more than two consecutive years next preceding the comuence- Answer. Yes ment of this action? Answer Yes. Has the defendant been a resident of Iredell County, North preceding the filing of this action’ NORTH CAROLINA | J ROLINA, IN THE SUP“RIOR COURT (3) TREDELI, COUNTY Carolina for a period of six months next Answer Yes. BERTIi S. STALLINGS { vs SUDGL.ENT YD Tc ty 1 + tT AT ~~ . ROBERT WILLIAs. STALLINGS { North Carolina In the Superior Court arch Term, 1950. This cause in coming on to be heard before Honorable William H. Bobbitt, Iredell County Judge fregsiding, over the } : eing heard before said H able Willi H ist | | | i Honorable William H. Bobbitt, and a jury, the following ista Vs | JUDG:.ENT FOR ABSOLUTE DIVORCE. were submitted to the Jury: Frances A. Caudle, Defendant. 1. Has the plaintiff b . = ~s c een a resid c S , oe 2. Were the sista the institution of ort’ tae Carolina for ' and apart I the plaintifi and defendant Ss : as alleged in the_com dais, apar j S . epare y liv a | S esv N F continuously for two years next preceding Scr abi tiabies oF ate ee At a Superior Court held in the court house at States ille, oCeoy The jur havi y having answered all of said issues "Yes", on the 13th day of March, 1950. Present: Hon. William H. Bobbitt, Judge. It is, th P ’ erefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the tuted in the Superior Court of Iredell bonds of matrimon i y heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be This action having been inst forever dissolved, a Vv vinculo frot ounfy on January $ uccessive » and the plainti i s 2 = plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce a “ey , ’ aad , . i two defendant, Robert Williams, $talli g ! ; ings, and that the Cost of this action be t@ arainst the plaintiff by the Clerk years neat preceding the filing of tne complaint, and the defendant having d complaint Wm, H. Bobbitt ———" been served personally with a summons and a copy of the verifie and deputy sheriff of Iredell County, Judge Presiding. , on January 11, 1950, by L. C.Boyd, a wer or other pleading thereto, * 3K PEAS AE BKK Os *K BI BS BS 3k ois 3 dhe ahs atc ake ote afc 3° WR AGE AE os BR BK BRIE HE DS De BENE DiC Bic Bic SMe ale th f h y ans IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Tuesday, iiarch l4th, 1950 Hi i this cause coming on to be heard before the Court and jury, amd the jury having answered yes to the following issues: (1) Were the plaintiff and the defendant married to each other as a}; te in the complaint? Answer: "Yes". other for more than two consecutive years next preceding the commencement of th: action? ANSWER: "Yes". (3) Has the defendant been a resident of Iredell County, North Caroli, for a period of six months next preceding the filing of this action? Answer: "Yqwv It is now therefore, on motion of Charles 0. P. Trexler of Salisbury, ii, attorney for the plaintiff, considered, ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and are hereby dissolved, declared null and void, and that the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. That the cost of this action be taxed against the defendant by the cleri, This March 14, 1950. Wm. H. Bobbitt Judge Presiding Iredell County Superior (0 luarch Term, 1950. Ns Bie aie aie ate aie afc Rie ate aye ake ic afc ate ake ae ae ae aie afc 2/6 3K 3 Noe 4,817 Wilbert H. Griffin DIVORCE The Divorce Jury fl", being duly sworn and empaneLé answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Vs. Annie Vavis Griffin, NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Wilbert H. Griffin Vs. ce ee Annie Davis Griffin 1. Did the plaintiff, Wilbert H. Griffin, and the defendant, Annie Davis Griffin, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes. 2. Have the plaintiff, Wilbert H. Griffin, and the defendant, Annie Dav Griffin, liv » lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years inmed prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes, 8 | 3, Has the plaintiff, Wilbert H. Griffin, been a bona fide resident of State of North Carolina for one year immediately preceding the commencement © Answer Yes. (2) Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from tS f this! IN + on uae <a _— tuestiah? marc here 1950 No. NORTH CRROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. wilbert H. Griffin, | Plaintiff, i sep | JUDGMENT Annie Davis Griffin, | Defendant. i This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the March Term, 1950, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury, to-wit; "1, Did the plaintiff, Wilbert H. Griffin, and the defendant, Annie Davis Griffin, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes. Have the plaintiff, Wilbert H. Griffin, and the defendant, Annie Devis nsecutige years immediately rs Griffin, lived separate and apart from each other for two co prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes. Wilbert H. Griffin, been a bona fide resident of the 3. Has the plaintiff, ding the commencement of thi: State of North Carolina for one year immediately prece action? Answer Yes." The Court finds that the summons in this action was issued by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on January 26, 1950, and that the summons was served on the defendant, Annie Davis Griffin, by lL. ©. Boyd, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, on Jauary 27, 1950, by delivering to the defendent, Annie Davis Griffin, a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint. It appears to the Court from the affidavit of Wilbert H. Griffin, the plaintiff, that Annie Davis Griffin, the defendant, was not, at the time of the institution of this action, is not now, nor has she been since the institution of this action, in the military service of the United States of America. ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, plaintif and defendant, be, and bonds of matrimony heretofire existing between the they are, dissolved, and that the plaintiff, Wilbert H. Griffin, is granted an absolute divorce from the defer ant, Annie Davis Griffin. Let the cost of this action be paid py the plaintiff. This March 14, 1950. wm. H. Bobbi a ae ae se aes Re ae ae a ae a aE a Ba aE 3 a BS we Be se se ae a ae 2 Bea a a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Tuesday, March lith, 1950. No. 4820 1 ii, Caebied in the Superior Court Iredell County. March Term, 1950. i i | DIVORCE Vs. — Pansy Nadine Newton . 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Cy plaint? . Answer. YeS. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the filing of this Compdaint? fnswer. Yes. 3. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. ORTH CAROLINA 3 5 NORTH CAROLINA, IN the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. luarch Term, 1950. warvin G. Newton, dr. | Vs. " JUDGMENT Pansy Nadine Newton | This cause coming on to be heard ad being heard at the March Term, 195 Superior Court of 4redell County, before His Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record, and it appearing to the Court that there was born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant a child, David Lee Newton, age eighteen months and thi the defendant herein has the care and custody of said child; and it further appeals to the Courtaand the Court finds as a fact the defendant is a fit and suitable pe to have the custody and control of the minor child, David Lee Newton, and that best interest of said minor would serve by being tn the custody of his mother, S# being found to be a fit person for the custody of said minor. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrise! hered! heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defen? > it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, Pansy Nadine mee be and she is hereby awarded full and complete care, custody and control of the minor child, David Lee Newton, This cause , in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, wm. H, Bobbitt retained for further orders, This the 14th day of harch, 1950. Jodze udge Pres” PRR TERRA HER HE REE HERES He Re Hee We tes if H Marvin @. Newton, Jr. yy . | The Divorce PuEved2"y Peng duty SHES 204, emperelule N} s TT iit C) i MARCH TERM Tuesday, arch 11, 1950 th, 1950 No. 4621 Phyllis Goble hyers The Divorce Jury #1", being dyly sworn and empanelled 1 DIVORCE 1 A answers the issues submitted to it as follows: 7 | Rex B. lyers IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ih RTH CAROLINA NORTE MARCH, 1950, Term IREDELL COUNTY Phy}lis Goble Myers Vs. ee ee H wn wn ¢ G3 { Rex B. hiyers i ne 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the an | | complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for ; two years immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for i more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH C ARULINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH, 1950 Term Phyllis Goble myers i Vs. I JUDGMENT UF ABSOLUTE DIVORCE Rex B, Myers | This cause coming on to be heard at the regular March, 1950, Term of Superior Court for iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding and a jury and the jury having answered the following issues as indicated, and as appears in the record, viz: 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes 2. fave the plaintiff and the defer ant lived separate and apart for two years immediately preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer; Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceeding the commencemtn of this action? Answer: Yes It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are hereby dissolved and that the plaintiff be, and he ighereby granted an absolute Wm, H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding divorce from the defendant. she se se she a eae a HC CER ROM EE I I HRI IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN MR PERE" BP ) 69 We MARCH 1) 1 1950 | Tuesday, march 14th, 9 Tuesday, march 14 th,1950 " rr i i Mie |) hi 1 H Noe 4606 | 1 li) NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | ae \ i fy a a | IREDELL COUNTY. No. 4091 mice |) aie Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Rk. E. Jack a A We SUPERTOR COU cy ae Bunch Funeral Home, f, Ce MeAuley, R. C. Lawson, Paul Feimster, L, aired B= NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPHXIOR COURT a , plaintiff, j Charlie Adkins, Farrell W. Ostwalt, Miss Mary A. Cashw ine IREDELL COUNTY. | ts . | Herbert Morrison, R. S. Collins, mM. A. Bell and R, L, 5 Ni S. " ie | Jury sworn and empanethed fol : i Q 1 sal Me Me Warren ‘ Pp e e as” ° lows: Re E. Jackins F. C e if Hillery Tillotson and | ISSUES Plaintiff, ; iuley, R. C. Lawson, Paul Feimster, L. Young White éharlie ie i, F, Gaither, ISSUES Aékins, Farrell W. Ostwalt, miss mary A. Cashwell fierbert Defendants. Vs. i worrison, R. G. Collins, i. A. Bell and Rk. L. willer | ISSUES. | —-— — | il} | In what amount, if any, is the defendant, Hillery Tillotson indebted to the Kasry ~ ails t ti! > + 1] | plaintiff on account of the reasonable value of services rendered by the plaintiff t 4 li incident to the funeral and burial of the defendant's wife? } 1 1 2 Ys 2 | iy . Answer: 3265.00 plus interest. 1. Did the plaintiff perform extra service for the defendant over am above ) what was required of him under the original contract, as alleged by the plaintiff? ia \ |) i . r Answer: Yes | : | ye ; + i 2, In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the phaintiff? | | Answer: $30.00. : ™ 3615- Albert Gibbs vs. marie Gibbs, ------------- CohhedmerdPatTed . | No.474h- Odella Walker vs. Ernest Walker, ---------- Continued : . No. 4796= Allen Wade Shue, BNF vs. Betty Pope Shue, ------- Continued : lo. 4810- Thomas Max echaad talon t-acaneenene=-oGuahhunenl ! | & 4752- Fred H. Benfield vs. R. kk. Beaver, ----- Continued | No. 47702 ©. C, Johnston et al, vs. Harmon Gillespie et al, ----- Continued ) | > 4785= Statesville Roofing & Heating vs. R. C. Church, ------ Continued | | No. 4824- Jennie S, Wilson vs. Willie Lee Wilsonp ---------- Continued ) \Ov 4373~ Western Textile Co ins-¥s-G-&-+-motor—Transfer.00o, ----=Gentimucd This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday luorning, march 15th, 950 at 9:30 O'Clock. WS Aote T_ JUDGE PRESIDING SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COUR IN Ta TER 0 MARCH TERM, 1950 “ Wednesday, march 15$h, 1950 Wednesday, march 15th, 1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday : NO. 4667 Morning, March 15th, 1950. yoRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. No. 4691 Plaintiff, Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: R. &. Jackins F. C. McAuley, R. C. Lawson, Paul Feimster, L. Young | NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPSREOR court | pimmer's Ince, ' Vs. White, Charlie Adkins, Farrell W. Ostwalt, W. F.Hinson oe ne | Robert F. Hicks, R. G. Collins, M. A. Bell and 1. Cc. Bosher, Jr.,Defendant. R. L. miller Me Me warren, e . Plaintiff, VS. Harry Howard, 1. Was the plaintiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of the Defendant. defendant, as alleged in tie complaint? This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Willia: Answer: No. Bobbitt, Judge presiding and a jury at the march 1950 Term of the Superior Court ¢ 2, What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Iredell County, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to them as foll a - . : ; ; . . : 1. Vid the plaintiff perform extra service for the defendant over and ab whe Jae On} hi _ + $ ; what was required of him under the original contract, as alleged by the plaintiff Answer: Yes ———a &. in What amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? “nswer: 530.00" It is therefore, ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaints NORTH CAROLINA, jie due wwarrren hav and > ™ n 7} ; ie j REDELI Ul e and recover Brom the defendant, the sum of $30.00 together with IREDELL COUNTY. the cost of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk. Rimmer's, Inc., This the 15th day of larch, 1950. Vs. fy ‘al > Oats Bobbitt T. C.Bosher, Jr. niho i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Hon. William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding at the March Tern, 1950, of the Superior Court of Iredell Younty, North Carolina, and a jury, ad the following issues being submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the defendant as follows: 1. Was the plaintiff's automobile damaged hy the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: No. 2. What damages, if agy, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover nothing of the defendant; that the plaintiff my the cost of this action a8 taxed by the Clerk. wm. H. Bobbitt Judge Presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR OOURT MARCH TERM, 1950 wednesday, march 16th,1950 Upon the coming in of the verdict the plaintiff moves to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the greater weight of evidence. Motion denied, Plaintiff excepts. Plaintiff thereupon moved to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on account of errors of law assigned and to be assigned. Motion denied Plaintiff excepts. Thereupon the Court signed the judgment as appears in wea To the judgment as signed the plaintiff in apt time in open court excepts ail notice of appeal to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Notice of appeal given ;, open Court. Further notice waived. The plaintiff is allowed 40 days within which: orepare and serve statement of case on appeal, and the defendant is allowed 30 day; from and after the date of such service within which to file exceptions or to preps and serve countercase. Appeal bond in the amount of $100.00 adjudged sufficient, Tais the 15th day of “arch, 1950. Wm. H. Bobbitt Judge Presiding. L799= We. O. horri - ae : ¢ uorrigon vs. w. 0. Church al, Continued L461 y™ Wi llianm Ww | VS n S tinued ‘ wu e Vunn Se Var EB H ry j a ce Elbert Helms, Con SP=3359 J. } Benr 7} : 399% P, Benne ; tt, et al, Vontinued IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Thursday, March l6th, 1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday Norming March 16th, 1950 at 9:30 O'clock. No. 3615 yoRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1950 Albert Gibbs { Vs. { marie Gibbs } This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff was called by the sheriff to come in and prosecute his action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute his action; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute her cross-action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the defendant failed and neglected to appear and prosecute her cross-action: It is fherefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff's action and the defendant cross-action be, and the same are hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff taxed with the costs. This the 14th day of march, 1950. WM e H. Lobbitt JUDGE PREOCIDING. . TH OPE RLOR UUUR MARCH TERM, 1950 Thursday, march 16th, 1950 x. No. 4606 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR Court, IREDELL COUNTY. Bunch Funeral Home, Inc., Plaintiff, Vs. Hilary Tillotson and lug F, Gaither, Defendants. This cause comes on to be heard before the undersigned Superior Court Jus at this, March Term, 1950, of the superior Cowt of Iredell County, North Caroli: and the Court, upon inspection of the file herein, finds the following facts; This action was comuenced by summons issued November 1948} which sumnons was served on the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, on December §, 1948, the defendant, Hilary P. Tillotson, filed herein, without representation by counsel, a pleading: paper entitled "lotion to dismiss complaint." At the January Term, 1949, toevit, on February 7, 1949, the aforesaid pleading or paper came before His Honor, Wilsi varlick, Judge Presiding, and was treated as a demurrer and was overruled. Thereu# the deferd ant, Hilary Tillotson, was allowed 30 days from February 7, 1949, withit which to file answer. On March 5, 1949, the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, filed answer herein, without representation by counsel, as appears in the record. On May 31, 1949, three papers, each entitled "hotion to dismiss as to deferant, Hilary Tillotson," as appears in the record, were filed, these three papers havilj been filed by the defen.ont, Hilary Tillotson, without representation by counsel. On June 2, 1949, there was filed in behalf of Hilary Tillotson by Messrs. Burke Burke, ittorneys, a pleading entitled "Amendment to Answer," Thereafter, to-wit, on June 16, 1949, the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, without representation by coun filed herein a pleading or paper entitled "Motion for a change of Venue," which motion has not been brought forward for hearing by the defendant, Hilary Tillotse The case was regularly calendared for trial at November Term, 1949, when MeSs rs. B . % B f urke & Burke, Attorneys for the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, moved for continuance, which i j - ’ motion was grapted by His Honor, Frank iu. Armstrong, then pre siding, by reason of the absence of the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, and evidence * a criticé E j € a ical attitude towards counsel of record, at which time the case was set dm peremptoril ; ; I ptoriiy as the first jury case to be tried at the January Civil Term, 1950. The c 1e Cause came on to be heard before the undersigned Superior Court Judge at the January Term, 1950 pees » ae which time the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, failed to 4P and then hes ‘ essrs. Burke & Burke made application dated February 6, 1950, for leave * withdraw S$ ‘w aS counsel for the deferd ant, Hilary Tillotson, and by order then enter) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Thursday, march 16th, 1950 messrs. Burke & Burke were permitted to withdraw as counsel, and the case was again continued and set down for hearing on the 14th day of March, 1950. It was then ordered that the Clerk of this Court be directed tosend a copy of the order to the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, by registered mail, with the request for a return receipt; the Clerk advises that he undertook to comply with the order in this respect, but that the addressee refused to accept the registered letter. This cause coming on now to be heard prior to trial on merits upon the motions in the file, on which no formal action has been taken, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the aforesaid motions to dismiss filed pay 31, 1949, and the motion for change of venue filed June 16, 1949, be, and the same are hereby denied; and it is ordered that the case proceed to trial on March 14, 1950, to-wit, thedate on which it was set atid calendared for trial. This the 14th day of march, 1950. Wm. H. Bobbitt Judge Presiding. NORTH C AROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1950. Bunch Funeral Home, Inc., Vs. JUDGHKE Hilary Tillotson and I. F. Gaither, This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Superior Court Judge and a jury at this, March Term, 1950, of the Superior Court of Iredel! County, North Carolina, upon the pleadings heretofore filed, toewit, the complaint, answer of the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, filed March 5, 1949, and amendmert to answer filed in behalf of the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, by tessrs. Burke & Burke, Attorneys, on June 2, 1949, and being heard, the plaintiff being represented by its Attorneys, lessrs. Lewis, Lewis & Hedrick, and the defer ant not being present either in person or through counsel, ahd the plaintiff having announced in open court that it submitted to judgment of voluntary non-suit a5 to the defendant, M. B. Gaither, and the jury, after hearing the testimony of R. C, Bunch, bk. F. Gaither, and I. E. Johnson, and the instructions as to the law given by the presiding Judge, having answered the issues submitted as set Out in the record: oe ~=o para ee Raymer Adams, Dearman & Win erry, 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Thursday, warch 16th, 1950 Accordingly, upon motion of Lewis, Lewis & Hedrick, Attorneys for the plaintiff, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed: 1. That this action be and is hereby non-suited as to the defendant, fi. F. Gaither. 2, That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, Hilary Tillot, the sum of $265.00, together with interest thereon at 6% per annum from April 1946. 3. That the defendant, Hilary Tillotson, pay the costs of this aftion x taxed by the Clerk. ” This march 14, 1950. Wm, H. Bobbitt JUDGs rasolDING. IN THE SUPSRIOR COURT, LARCH TERM, 1950. U. Re Roseman and wife, Hattie Roseman, et al, Vs. J, L. Raymer, Ethel B. Raymer, This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Superior Court Judge, presiding at this, march, 1950, Term of the Superior Court for Iredell (= North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel for™ respective parties that all matters in controversy arising upon the pleadings he in have been fully and finally compromised and settled outside of court upon tem whereby i p , es hereby the plaintiff for a valuable consideration, have @xecuted and de livered the defend s, D. Le Raym a eo ~ ‘ iff 1dant 9 Ye Le maymer and wife, Ethel B.Raymer, their heirs ard assigns, GF of conveya i : " 4 yance covering all their rights, title and interest in and to the real é particularly described in the complaint herein: Accoré & rn c : ° ccordingly, by consent, it is now ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: ks Bee Be: i. 3 ; swe | hat D. L, Raymer, and wife, Ethel B. Raymer, their heirs and assif d é ; j } and are hereby adjudged the owners in fee simple of the real estate particularly descri ; cribed in the complaint herein, free and clear of any interest or lien of kind of any of the plaintiffs therein and thereto Ze th e€ costs of this action having been paid in full, no further costs are taxed, This the 16th da CONSENTED TO: a oh & Hedrick urke urke Jones & Robinson, A. B. Ra Attorneys for Plaintiff y of march, 1950, Wm, H, Bobbitt , Jude Pr Attorneys for Defendants, RE ERE RR eS 3 Be eae eae eae ae ae ae ae ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERN, 1950 Thursday, March 16th,1950 - No, SP-2596 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AROLINA NORTH CA MARCH, 1950 Tern, IREDELL COUNTY. | J. C. Roseman Vs. U. I. Roseman, Holland Roseman, I ; nyerett Roseman, Hal Roseman, haude Roseman, Zelma Roseman, X Berta Roseman, Ozell Roseman, Irene Roseman and Ross Roseman, | This cause coming on to be heard at the regular arch, 1950, Term of Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina and being heard before the undersigned Judge Presiding, upon the motion of U. R. Roseman, H. ©. Roseman, naude Stikeleather, Zelma McHargue, Bert Davidson, Uzell Barker, Annie Campbell, H. Re Roseman, Alderline “. Keller, Ruth R. Cameron, Alma L. Roseman, Ruth R. Cameron and Alma L. Roseman having become twenty-one years of age since the notion herein was filed, and Udwin Roseman, by and through his Next Friend, Floy Wilkinson, heirs at law of Jane L. Roseman, to set aside the judguents and order signed by His Honor, 4. B. Cline, then Judge of the ouperior Court, at the October Term, 1947, of Superior Court of Iredell County, which judgmmts are recorded in the Office of the Cle#k of Superior Court of tredell County, in minute Docket No. 17, pages 94 and 95; and, It appearing to the Court am the Court finding as a fact from the original summonses and other original papers filed in this action constituting the record of this action that service of sumuons was regularly had upon all of the defendants named as defendants in this action including the minor defemants and their guardian ad litem therein and that a guardian at litem was duly appointed for the minors named in this action; and, the court finding further that U. Ie Roseman, who was appointed as guardian ad litem for the i:.inor defendants herein, had no interest in said action adverse to the interests of said minors, who were all his children, and the court finding further that said guardian ad litem employed counsel to defend his interests as guardian ad litem and the interests of said minors and that answer was properly filed herein for said minors; and Said guardian ad litem representing them, and, lt appearing to the court and the court fimling as a fact from sworn vestimony and if there were any fraud in the trial of said action, or in pro- curing the judgment entered herein, that said fraud was not participated in by the answering parties, 0. L, Raymer and wife, Ethel B. Raymer, J. H. mcKeithen, Trustee, Prudential Insurance Company of America, Frances A. Dorsey, Trustee or “TS. mia Armfield and that such fraud, if any there was, was without the know- ledge, consent, or acqudesence of said answering parties and that neither of them h , ad notice or by the exercise of reasonable diligence could have had notice of yeas = lac aa ec aaa ~—ap-- ~ a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1950 Thursday, march 1é6bh, 1950 any fraud or irrecularicies in this action on the judgment entered herein, It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion in this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed. It appearing that the costs incident to said motion have been paid, no further costs is taxed. Wm, H. Bobbitt JUDGE PRESIDING. =~ NO. 4373 NORTH O ARULIN: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT heard and being heard before His Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding, at the march Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon the motion by Land, Sowers & Avery, Attomeys for the Plaintiff toset aside the Consent Judgment entered into in the above entitled action for reason that the goods recited as having been returned to the plainti as set out i he said jud plaintiff as set out in the said judgment dated february 18 1948, have in fact , not been returned to the said plaintiff. And the court after hearing the argument of council, being of the opinion that the said motion should be denied. Now Therefo it is } : j f ow ihereiore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said motion % tne plaintiff be, and the same is hereby denied. This the loth day of march, 1950, JUDGE ] REoL DING No. 4718 yoRTH GAROLINA IN THE SUPSRIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK A, DaylonRogers-, T/A Rogers-winters vompany, Plainti Vs. Qllie Kimbrough and wife, Elizabeth Kimbrough, Thadius Kimbrough and wife, Esther Kimbrough, and Connie K. Spicer and husband, Robert Spicer Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. omita, Clerk of the Su-erior Court of Iredell County, upon the motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final. And it appearing to the Court that a verified Somplaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 5th day of July, 1949, on which four of the defendants were served and an Alias Summons was issued on the 3rd day of February, 1950 and served on the t wo other defendants. And it further appearing to the Court that the said summons together with a copy of said Complaint was served on the defendant, ULllie Kimbrough and wife, Blizabeth Kimbrough, Thadius Kimbrough and wife, Esther Kimbrough, on the Oth day of July, 1949, and said Alias Summons together with a copy of said Complaint was served on the other two defendants, Connie K. Spicer and husband, Robert Spicer, on the 10th ang 13th day of February, 1950. tt the time of the institu- tion of said action, the plaintiff caused to be filed in the said cause, a duly verified complaint attached towhich is an itemized, certified statement of the account sued upon in the said case. Thet the account sued upon in the said cause is based upon an entife and indivisible contract for labor and materials under the terms wf which the defendants agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 3779.00 together with interest from September 14, 1948. And it appearing to the Court that the amount sued upon is an agreed amount certain according to tue terms of an indivisible contract between the plaintiff and tne defendants. And it further appearing to the Court from the plaintiff's verified Complaint that the Plagntiff within the time permitted by the statute, namely the 7th day of Yanuary, 1949, filed a Notice and Cliam of Lien against the property of the defendant located on the South side of Unity Drive, and being more particularly described as follows: or ee Saas BEATS Beginning at an iron stake in the south side eo Drive and runs with Unity Drive South 533 East 101 feet to an iron stake on the West side of Pecan ees thence with Pecan Street, South 4 West 96 feet to an ashe; thence ne W si with the West e pf Pecan Street South <7 Wes et to an iron stake on the vest side of Pecan Street, Frank Houpe's corner, thence with hisline, Nort) 85 West 101 feet to an iron stake in houpe 5 line; thence a new line North 19; Bast 3394 feet to the beginning, containing 35,451 square feet, more or less, And it further appearing to the Court that the said action was duly con. menced in the Superior Court of Iredell County within the time permitted by law, namely six months from the date of filing said lien, and it further appearing ty the Court that No Answer has been filed with the Clerk and no extension of time for filing Answer has been granted by the Clerk. And it further appearing to the Court that the time for filing answer in said cause has expired. And that no Ans has been filed in said cause by the defendants. Now, Therefore, te plaintiff through its attorneys, Land, Sowers & Avery having moved for Jusigment by default final for the sum certain to be recovered in said itemized, certified Complaint and for the Clerk to declare said amount a lie, upon the property described in the Complaint and that the property be sold accorii; id that the therefrom be applied to the payment of this Judgment a costs of thi sts incidental to said sale. it is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed: That the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of 3779.00 with interest thereon from tie l4th day of September 1948 until paid. That the said judsment be and the same is hereby declared to be a lie against the property declared in the plaintiff's Complaint and that the said lien against the said property dated from the 14th day of July 1948, the day upon whic the plaintiff and the defendants entered into the indisisible contract heretofor referred to. 4 be appliec h ‘ ‘ o init in ° R : . ee : anctt pplied to the payment of this judgment and the costs of this action and te ™ incidental to the saidsale Tiuis the 16th day of warch, 1950, C., G, Smith Tlerk superior Court, Iredell County WS 2S HR DK OK BK Be He ik oie aie sie ic aie ic 2\< hc aie afc aie oie jx 34s 2x 2s 3 3. That this property be sold according to law and that the proceeds the NO. 4641 A ip r TT TOE COU NORTE CARULINA SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Jethro Rumple, Admr. of Jerry L. Rumple Vs JUDGIKENT OF NON-SUIT elvin Richard Hyder This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and the plaintiff having come into court through counsel and stated that he did not desire to further prosecute this action against the defendant. It is, therefore, ordered, considered add adjudged with the consent of the plaintiff, that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed and a judgment of non-suit entered against the plaintiff. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the court costs. This March ll&th, 1950. a. Sn Smith Clerk Superior court of — Iredell County By consent: Jethro Rumple _ Plaintiff Administrator of Jerry L. kumple Scott & Collier, Attys for Plf. Se ae gg ree And it is considered and adjudged further, that the defendants In the Superior Court 1 pay the costs in this Court incurred, to-wit, the sum of Twenty veven - h er - Cour ao f oe : bo r c } 5 | ig here , and 70/100 dollars (327.70), and execution issue therefor. Caas ‘ gee ee —- = ~~ SE enpEECuerra-—ars 2S a _ ADRIAN J. NEWTON en Clerk of the oupreme Court Sener ae 4 ‘d before tne undersismed Clerk of cen ha i. wietnuke OP ond A = ourt that the plaintiff and defendant existing between them Luntery non-Suit. wmnd decreed that the action = smith : - an yr Vourt jismisset perior Court of Iredell County. Louten > eth. and Hildrec rriso And it is considered and adjudged j in this Court incurred, to-wit, tu consicered upon the motion of the plaintiff execution issue therefor. : i . : - Adrm Je Newton _ $$ s from the Superior Court of “Terk of the »upreme Court. ions raised and presented have consi aia hat the considered and adjudged that ' L J owed ee ae e id that it be so certified to th 7 urt of Jredell County vounty, ; Ye 1, 495 re G mit! ¢ superior intl nae ‘i o ort a) C C4 $, ¢,.. oO ra ¢ 45 By c C, ay > 4 r> is. " ei et a LN 2 _ = ; iy = s > = a ; 4 an eS - m —T e - =a ge 2 C4 7 C- on 4 ; : a nw o l ' ' nw i 4 «f ( ‘ s! ,? ~4 = “1 - -) | a) ' 4 © | 5 4 e! ° : ! bp 3 ' e) 1 } ‘ ) - ) ' 4 : = vn” 4 ) > ¢ * Q « 4 t ‘ ; « O $ ty + . a : 4 ¢ 1 ( : o nee = 2 s : » $, - p » @ v er? ¢, s +4 . 4 +7 »e 9 oO ov oO ¢ . © q > Ly C » . o ; . ; iad - “ vi * @ of ; oO ¢ « ¢ 4 = P ¢ a t, ® + : P +7 3 4 ry - : S - . } ’ ~., . ° q ‘ " a + © 7) : - = “ ~ ‘ ; oO Gu > < ¢ + ; ba = = : ES — m4 2 @ 4 = ; w $4 © - et re) 1 2 w G4 4 £ — > > + > ? 9 o Sy me ++ “4 > a | : uy + of S ci Sod : ~ ¢ @ my > » , = a > ‘ @ a ‘ a “ < @ ~ i c £ > bug oO ¢ @ £ i * ~~ 7 a ° ic G4 c a : . wD ‘S cS i #«C C ‘* > ) oO 2 @ 4 { Es. ns rm) » q w + ~~ “~ D . c » : a ‘ 3 » > ? 1 Mo © « : : + 4 - ) | = s ' > -~' > sae ' ‘ ¢ ' ° ‘ ‘ he urt + @ 7) @ > $4 ort > we 4 eg > oO > by - GY 5 . C S r - ww $4 q f | 2 | ' aah » ' he ; < >4 Oo O : ro) 4 by S ® Oo al a —_— —_« sane E » qa ; 4 C ~ v 7 : ; . 7 c $4 4 oO Q & an ? a i ”~ > - 4 . u 3 . Pp ° c © e > - tA . 3 7 o a “a y ¢ ount ore - th 1 ae +A VV elected ,;c © i 4 : on tiil Ain tne a as Ui. fe reco 2p ! i wn bl oO 3r0 ul [ = a ® . 4 o 2OoTG 4 Ow © © 4 ore WY bf ‘ ® ® a ‘A 4 Op pt o. i. + ~ Pond oO t,*> 2Or sa a S eect. ' =. C3 Oh Sin rac 2 . oO "7 ~ a 3 ) 3 : o ® S © —y G4 oct > c. 3 OO & & S owt ° Sho ; POA wo PBL 5 : 36° E am 20 * 23 *G : -c =~ + + > > <= 3 S » e A C r _-_ © a E O26 ac Beerd fa ° “4 mo ‘ 4 ct ° -" S S S&S LO a O-ri @ a our <= 0 toh c one: > tro ®@ a 1 ct > © ¢ $m $4 - c > Oo rf Gas 4 ah Aa + eye iered, erk . cost > ¢ ourt < Vv nith yerior wal —— ’ ie k 01 an ‘te ~ vw , 4 Me » “4 -~ Ee G4 @ Tw . i @ Oo 4 = G4 c q e + - C @ uN - xe) a a a 8 oO ri re @ : vY Ee “a ! a 3 +O =o N > » oT) » ooa, 4 Oo 8 > ->MA ~ 4 n & - M4 = ° os . Sa Se » Seo O S oO OGh@QD e Pex O hr oO G4 ~~ | fx, c-< th ‘tled in Nar th kat OCcK lerk of G r+ 2 rs ¢ os . 5 an ~ oO =~ c¢ bh > af fice of the AYA \y i o 1 11+ \ soe Superior Yourt 1 nty. pril f Le t J Ou ’ ida 54 aud a I } A ler Oo nty . ” , a8 OF ,a aid 1 iV) action. omy ~ 4 ed to the © C > »Y livery of the ' tne sum of 607.25), together with interest ‘rom the 2nd iy of November. 1c 2 eT r,191,9, t tnereon until No. 4720 NORTH CAROLIN., IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK J. L. White Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Terry Graham Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Honorable C. GC. smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the parties to this action have settled all matters in contoversy existing between them, and that the defendant has paid and satisfied the plaintiff for the amount as asked for by the plaintiff in his Complaint. It i : » t is therefore upon the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorneys for WH laintiff, that the plaints plaintiff, that the plaintiff be and he is allowed to take a non-suit in this matt® and the plaintiff is hereby non-suited, This the 19th day of May ,1950, C. G. Smith Ge © er’ A * Superior ’ EAE DE EE 3 BE BB BIC aC Me NE ae ae aie ae ale ake ake ate ale ale ake ale ale le ate ale ate a af NO. 4722 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Gage Connor Plaintiff Vs. ferry Graham | 1 i JUDGMENT 1 1 Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Honorable ¢, G. Smith, Clerk a the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that tle parties to this action have settled all matters in controversy existing between them, and that the defendant has paid and satisfied the plaintiff for the amount as asked for by the plaintiff in his Complaint. It is therefore upon the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be and he is allowed to take a non-suit in this matter and the plaintiff is hereby non-suited. This the 19th day of May,1950. of ouperior No. 4723 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK J. H. White Plaintiff Vs. _ JUDGMENT Terry Graham Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it eppearing to the Court that the parties to this action have settled all matters in controversy existing between them, and that the defendant has paid and satisfied the plaintiff for the amount as asked for by the plaintiff in his Complaint. It is therefore upon tke motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be and he is allowed to take a non-suit in this Ratter and the plaintiff is hereby non-suited. This the 19th day of May,1950. Ge Ge Sutth crank oF Superto ° . omit ’ erKk O uper or Court hee se ae oe ae ae ae a eae a a A RE EI 2 2 CIE 2 3 KA BTS Ras AB ig ere > ay mov ae leet Saooeeee—_—ee———EE Ea IN. THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- MAY’TERM, 1950 Monday, May 22nd, 1950 yorTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and state at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 22nd day of May, 1950, at 10:00 O'Clock A. M. when and where his Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring term, 1950, is present and presiding, and Honorable John R. McLaughlin, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. W. D. Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and opened Court by order of the Court. we De Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court the nanes of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the May Term, 1950, First Week, to-wit: J. H. Gibbs Julian S. Moore P. L. Wilkins Allen P. Moore S. Jd. Knox F. F. Smith Janes Hobbs Kenneth B, Bradburn H. We Sloop E, H. Plyler J. C. Crawford J. M. Arey, Sr Blackwelder O. F. McCoy Floyd A.Brawley C. L. Bunch Marshall Maness Readling D. Harwell W. G. Warren C. W. Jonnson Lackey J. C. Holmes Wade D. Vuncan James Hobbs was out of the County cbocBlacknebkder omk Fe. F. Smith wes not returned W. G. Warren was excused on Doctor's Certificate wade D. Duncan was excused by the Court W. We. Woodward, was sworn as officer of the Grand Jury. No.717 NON=-SUPPORT state Alias Capias vs Robert watts No. 725 BASTARDY state Continued under former order vs T. L. Nixon No. 71,0 NON=SUPPORT State Continued under former order s hanual Shoemaker N s BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY a ALias’Capias Dee Vioods i hl i | a - > eee ee ere eee se o— —— No. 94,0 state vs John Henry Summers No. 942 otate vs Onie L. Nicholson No. 953 Btate vs John W. Ollis No. 954 otate vs Richard G. hiller No. 390 orate vs Joe Johnson NWOe L054 state Vs T Eddie Joines No. 1163 otate vs James R. Harris No. 1167 otate vs Vaddeli No. 1185 otate vs Willie W No. 1205 State vs Nathan Patverson No. 1222 etate vs Billy Rankin No. 1271 otate vs trvin Shufford No. 1290 State vs George Lee Connor N ~ Rt até vs Lee F. Blevins No. 1103 State vs Guy Ramsey IN THE SUPERIOR COURT : FIRST WEEK ---- MAY’ TERM, 195 ““nonday, May 2énd, 1956 LARCENY Alias Capias BASTARDY Continued under former order NON=SUPPORT Alias Capias NON#SUPPORT Alias Capias LARCENY Alias vapias NON=SUPPORT Continued under former order ,ouYy 4 Gate Jontinued under former order Alias Capias BURGLARY Continued under former omer BAS TARDY vontinued under former order POSSESS LIQUOR Alias Capias ABANDONMENT AND NON-SUPPORT Continued unddr former order ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON vVontinued under former order ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Nol Pros With inane , FALSE PRETENSE The defendant called and failed, Judgment Nist sei Fa dnd capias, No. 1211 State vs conrad E. Redman No. 1275 State vs J, F. Rhinhart No. 1287 State vs Corby Kelly No. 1303 State vs James C. Jcenhour No. 1307 State vs cyrus ©, Johnston,Jr. No. 1349 State vs Billy Joe Hubbard wen No. 1366 State vs John R. Tuttle W-30 m™ i990 State vs David H. Harkey No. 1340 State vs *larence V. Johnson No. 1337 State vs Fred Thos. Garrison \- l 8 No. 1338 owtate vs fred Thos, Garrison No. 1353 State vs James Baker Wio, 1354 State vs, Sen jamin J.Threatte, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1950 Monday, May 22nd, 1950 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued by Consent FALSE PRETENSE Continued for the State ROBBERY Abete by death SPEEDING The defendant called am failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. DRIVE DRUNK Continued for the Vefendant SPEEDING ; The defendant enters a plea of guilty as charged in the Waprant. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a fine of $25 and pay the cost of this action. SPEEDING The defendant enters a plea of guilty as charged in the Warrant. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a FINE of $25 and pay the cost of this action. DRIVE DRUNK Continued for the Defendant SPEEDING The defendant enters a plea of guilty as charged in the Warrant. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a FINE of $25 and pay the cost of this action. RECKLESS DRIVING The defendant through his Attorney, Mr. Hugh G. Mitchell enters a plea of guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a FINE of $25 and pay the cost of this action. This judgment is consolidated with Case No. 1338 for judgment. SPEEDING The defendant throyen his Attorney, Mr . Hugh G. Mitchell enters a plea of guilty as charged. ROBBERY A TRUE BILL ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A TRUE BILL Jr. Beg Sg TP Ee I Scent geen aaa : = A a eet a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Bi. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY’TERM, 1950 FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Monday, May 22nd, 1956 , Mom ay, May 22nd,1956 BREAKING A!I'D ENTERING 1346 DRIVE DRUNK No. 1355 A true Bil No. 13 Continued by consent otate se vs ras i3 1 vie Lee Gant Nan tev ay faut Jarvis &. Al ORR Aerrssee, or AIDING AND ABETTING No. 1356 A TRUE BILL No.l254 = 73 Sie SS Ss State | NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, oy er Sam Ervin & Harold Mitchell | IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1950 == ‘STATE AIDING AND ABETTING ’ ee — A True Bill < ORDER FOR SPECIAL VENIRE. vs Sam Ervin James Foote. Harold Mitchell ae = aeei To the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Iredell County,-Greeting: 7 1356 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Whereas, the Court finds that it is necessary to a fair and impartial “7. A TRUE BILL ' vs * > . . James darren trial of the defendant, who stands charged with the crime of murder in the first Odell Morrison,dr. degree, that a special venire of 25 persons be summoned as jurors of this court: Now 1352 a ee —— Now, therefore, the Court in its discretion and upon motion of counsel State a é mw Dids :" for the defendant, now commands you to bring into open court forthwith the jury Wii iam Moore boxes of Iredell County, and orders that 25 scrolls be drawn from Jury Box No.l > 2399 ror SRING AND LARCENY in open court by a child under ten years of agee 9ta Le A AUS aud at It is further ordered that the Clerk of this Court insert the names David Clark,Jdr. appearing on the scrolls so drawn in a writ of venire and execute and deliver such No. 1360 FORGERY State A TRUS BILL vs Ervin Feimster writ of venire to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and said Sheriff shall summon the persons named in said writ, and no others, to be and appear at this court at No. 1361 FORGERY the court house of Iredell County, Statesville, N. C., for jury service on Tuesday, NOe 36 FOF GER} State A TRUE BILL the 23rd day of May, 1950, at 9:30 O'clock A. M., to the end that so many of them vs “rvan Feimster as may be chosen, sworn and empanelled shall act as jurors in this action, No. 1362 FORGERY This the 22nd day of May, 1950. = = Soe Sele Wm. H. Bobbitt vs Ervin Feins ter Judge Presiding. No. 1303 FORGERY ia A TRUE BILL Ervin Feimster No. 136 ii Shake , FORGERY vs A TRUE BILL Ervin Feimster No. 1308 t.BEZZLEMENT State vs me enters a plea of guilty of embezzlement 48 We We. Webster ws ne in th Judgment of the Court is that the defendant, be confined sentaree tte. ®_ Prison for the term of ONE YEAR. The prise a Ml iS Suspended and the defendant is placed on probate s e period of THREE YEARS in accordance with the terms ormal probation judgment. Court ou) That as 5s j ; the defendant shalir of probation ordered by ” Pay the cost of this action, Pay restitution in amount of $434.84 to Southern Life Ins" IN fH SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM 1950 Monday, May 22nd, 1950 IN THE SUPERIOR NORTH CAROLINA, COURT, IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1950 LU y ° State, V ORDER FOR SPECIAL VENIRE. Se James Foote. To W. D. Morrison, Sheriff of Iredell vounty,- Greetings jhereas, the Court has found that it is necessary to a fair and impartiz trial of the defendant, who stands charged with the crime of murder in the first degree, that a special venire of 25 persons be summoned as jurors of this court; And whereas, the Court in its discretion and upon motion of counsel for t defendant, has ordered that the Clerk of the Board of County commissioners of Ired County bring into open court the jury boxes of Iredell County, and that 25 scrolls: drawn from Jury 30x N. 1 by a child under ten years of age; and that the names so drawn shall constitute a special venire; that the Clerk of this Court shall insert the names appearing on the scrolis so drawn in a writ of venire and shall execute x jeliver such writ of venire to you, the Sheriff of Iredell County, to the end thats shall sumnion the persons named in said writ ,and no others, to be and appear at th sourt in the courthouse of iredell vounty, Statesville, N. C., for jury service on Tuesday, the 23rd day of May, 1950, at 9:30 O'clock, A. NM. The Court now finding that, in compliance with its said order, the 25 scrolls were duly drawn from said Jury sox No. 1 in open court by Ronald Summers, a child 6 years of age, and that the names appearing thereon have been inserted in «4 writ of venire executed and delivered to you by the Clerk of this Court, all in the manner provided by the Clerk's said order and in accordance with law in the presence of the defendant and of the defendant's counsel: NOW, THEREFORE, You are hereby commanded to summon the persons whose nait! : : ou were so drawn and inserted in the writ of venire so executed and delivered to J 1 County, 1950, by the Clerk of this Court, to be and appear at the court house of {redel Statesville, N. C., at 9:30 O'clock, A. M., on Tuesday, the 23rd day of ayy ' ct to the end that so many of them as may be chosen, sworn and empanelled shall 4 as jurors in this action. Herein fail not, and of said writ of venire make due return. wm. H, Bobbitt udge Presiding. This the 22nd day of May, 1950. HO ASIC RB a a ea Re ai a a Ra NE I ae ae ae a a ai Nea a a No. 1352 State vs William Moore No. 1353 State vs James Baker No. 1355 State vs -17 Harold hitchell, Sam Ervin, k -1 Paul Jarvis» ol John Morrison, Jr.-17 w= No. 1356 State vs Sam Ervin Harold Mitchell 1355, 1350 & Now 1369’ ; State vs sam Ervin Harold Mitchell Paul Jarvis John Horrison,dr. No.1358 State vs James \arren ‘dell Morrison No. 1368 State vs, Je J. Campbell ie io. 1350 State vs Yohn Price g W332 Sherrill In THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK'=--- MAY TERM, 1950 Monday, May 22nd, 1950 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued for the defendant ROBBERY Continued for the defendant BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendants in open court enter a plea of guilty of Breaking & Entering as charged in the first count in the bill of indictment and of larceny as charged in the second count. XDOOONDOURERIXK BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendants each in open court through their counsel, Mr. Fred Hedrick, enter a plea of guilty of Breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony as charged in the first count in the bill of indictment. SBREAK ING ENTERINGGAND LARCENY The defendants in open court through their counsel, Mr.Fred Hedrick enters a plea of guilty of breaking‘ entering with (intent to comuit a felony as charged in the first count in the bill of indictment. As to Harold Mitchell and Sam Erin, in Cases No #1355, 1356 and 1357 these cases are consolidated for the purpose of judgment. Judgment of the Court is that each of the defendants, Harold Mitchell and Sam Ervin be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the state Highway and Public Works vVomaission. As to Paul Jarvis in case #1355, these two couhts are consolidated for the purpose of judgement. Judgment of the Court is that Paul Jarvis be confined in the comaon jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and jublic Works Commission. This road sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation for the period of THREE YEARS. As to John Morrison, in case #1355, these two counts are consolidated for the purpose of judgment. Judgment of the Court is that John Morrison be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This road sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation for a period of THREE YZARS. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant James Warren pleads not gulssy Jury sworn and empanelled.F thr nex ax verdietx ofxnotx eakitys The defendant Odell Morrison enters a plea of guilty as charged. Werren At close of State's evidence defendant moves for judgment mat of Non-suit. Motion allowed. FORGERY The defendant enters a plea of guilty of forgery as charged in the bill of indictment. Judgment of tne Court is that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison at Raleigh for a term of ONE YAR. This Prison sentence is suspended ami the defendant is placed on robation for tie period of THREE YARS. It is provided hat the defendant pay the cost of this action, and also make a full restitution of the checks called to the attention of the court, all as set forth particularly in the formal judgment of probation. MANSLAUGHTER a The defendant through his attomey, Mr. W. R. Battley enters a plea of NOT GUILTY. The being unable to agree, upon their verdict the Court dh ts discretion withdraws a juror and orders a mistrial. Contigued until August Term, 1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Monday, May 22nd, 1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, May 23rd, 1950 FALSE PRETENSE This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday No. 1315 Nol Prossed : State Morning, vs Neil Fox No. 1317 & 1318 No. 1347 POSSESSING LIQUOR ae State The defendant through his counsel, \. R. Battley enters a 5), os vs of Nolo Contendere. Dat nuke Davis Etta l.ae Davis Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned ; a the comion jail of Iredell County and assigned to work under We supervision of State Highway & Public works Commission for ; period of SIX MONTHS. The road sentence is suspended on the following conditions 1. That the defendant pay a fine of 50 and pay the mst ,: this action. ' 2, That the defendant not violate any of tne criminal la; of the State of North Carolina for the period of TH BARS from the date of the rising of this court. REE YEARS Capias and comuitment to issue to put the road sentence in; effect upon motion of the Solicitor and order the Superior (oy Judge then presiding at any time within THREE YEARS from th z of the rising of this court upon proof satisfactory to such Superi or Court Judge that the defendant has violated any of i conditions upon which the road sentence is suspended, ~ Noo 254 State vs James Foote GRAND JURY REPORT ee-- JAY TERM, e-- IREDELL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CO1-54 The Grand Jury met and passed on all bills that were presented by the Soli: nd found true bills in all cases. Inasmuch as at the January Term of Court, inspection was made of the County _ ‘a ; ; ; No. 1359 Jail and County Home, and these were found to be in good condition, tie Grand Jury oe ‘y } ‘ . ‘ . t ; ; V8. inspected only the State Prison Camp and the Court House at this session. David Clark. Jr ha "9 . A Comaittee composed of R. C0. McConnell, W. F. Moore and Lee Brown inspecte C~16 the Prison Camp- and found 99 colored men in Camp. The Camp is in good condition. the quarters were clean and prisoners reported that they were well feed and well tr =o COURT HOUSE in, Kack Bass,Jr. At the January Term of Court the Grand Jurv recommended that certain repailt “— be made in the office under the office of the Register of Deeds and also in the of fit under the Clerk of Superior Court's office. This has not been done. we recomend again that these repars be made and in addition that satisfacte lighting be provided in the office under the Registor Office so that this room may utilized as working quarters. ‘ie also recommend that the small room ad joining the kegistor's Office and used by the typest be painted. Respectfully submitted, /s/ ie Ba ABS ror This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, May 23rd, at 9:30 Ae M. 1950 IW Got Te May 23rd, 19502 *© 9230 O'clock. FORGERY The defendant in open court enters a plea of guilty as charged. The two cases are consolidated for the purposes of judgment. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of LIGHT MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This road sentence is suspended on conditions that the defendant not violate an of the criminal laws of the State of North Carolina for the period of TWO YLARS from the date of the rising of this court. Capias and comuitment to issue to put the road sentence into effect upon motion of the Solicitor and order of the Superior Court Judge then presiding at any time within TWO YEARS from the date of the rising of this court upon proof satisfactory to such Superior Court Judge that the defendant has violated any of the conditions upon which the road sentence is sus- pended. MURDER The defendant tenders a plea of guilty of murder in the Second Derree, which plea is accepted by the State. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in lene State Prison at Raleigh, for a term of not less than NINE nor more than TWELVE YARS, It is ordered that the Court reporter make an original and one copy of the evidence in this case, the cost thereof to be paid by the Board of County Commissioners of Iredell County. The original of such transcript to be forwarded to the Commissioner of Paroles, copy to be retained in the court file. BREAKING, JZNTERING AND LARCENY The defendant in open court enters a plea of guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of ZIGHT MONTIIS to be —_— to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. DRIVE DRUNK The defendant enters a plea of not Guilty. ‘ : ; Jury sworn and empanelled, and returned a verdict of guilty as charged. _ Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a Fine of $109.60 and pay the cost, and be confined in the comaon jail of Iredell County for a period of NINTY DAYS assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, The road sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay the fine and cost in full at this time. 2. That the defendant not oneeete a motor vehicle upon any public highways of the State of North Carolina for the period of TWELVE MONTHS from the date of the rising of this court. Capias and committment to issue to put the road sentence into effect upon motion of the Solicitor and order of the Superior Court Judge then presiding at any time within TWO YEARS from the date of the =. of this court upon proof satisfacto to such Superior Court Judge that the defendant has violated any of the conditions upon which the road sentete is suspended. WITNESS-= The motion of the Probation Officer that this defendant's probation be revoked is presently denied without prejudice to the right of the Probation Officer to renew such motion in the event he deems the further conduct of the defendant to justify that course. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON : The defendant in open court through his counsel, Mr. W. R. Battley, enters a = of guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jadi of Iredell County for a period of SIX, MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State pon vf and Pyblic Works Commission. The road sentence is suspended on the following conditions: 1. That the defendant pay the cost of this action. 2. That the defendant not violate any of es . ° of 4 ris $e br this £35 ee (Continued on. ee were on “* a a SE SE SS BSS ees ES State vs Frank Tyson No. 1343 State vs walter Teague w=38 No. 1344 State vs Walter Teague Ho. 2321. state vs Flake Mullis Wo.1313 & 131324 utate vs. Floyd Steele No. 1339 state vs David H. Harkey IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY'TERM, 1950 ““puesday, May 23rd, 1950 (Continued from page 101) | Capias and commitment to issue to put the road senten effect upon motion of the Solicitor and order of the ence int Court Judge then presiding at any time within Two YEARS free | date of the rising of this court upon proof Satisfactory = | such Superior Court Judge that the defendant has violateq 0 any of the conditions upon which the road sentence is susp. ended. LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of guilt Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined i,'s. comion jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX MONTHS tote assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highwa et Public Works Commission. Y ae DRUNK AND DISORDERLY The defendant enters a plea of guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendanc be confined int common jail of Iredell County for a period of THIRTY DAYS to} assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway a Public Works Commission. This sentence is to run concurrent}; with the sentence in No.1343. RAPE On account of a material witness for the State, and without objection by the defendant, this cause is continued to the August Term, 1950. BRAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY; BURGLARY Continued DRIVE DRUNK Continued for the defendant I, William Stewart Neel, do solemnly swear that I will support the constitu of the United states; so help me, God. /s/ William Stewart Neel I, William Stewart Neel, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will be f* ful and bear true allegiance to the state of North Carolina, and to the constitubiow powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; and that I will endeavor to Support, maintain and defend the constitution of said State, not inconsistent with the constitution of the United States, to the best of 7 knowledge and ability; so help me, God, I /s/ William Stewart Neel_— » William Stewart Neel, do solemnly swear that I will truly and honestly demean myself in the practice of any attorney, according to the best of my knowledé? and ability; so help me, God, Sworn to and subscribed before me this /s/ William Stewart Nee 22nd day of May, 1950, Wm, H, Bobbitt , JUDGE PRESIDING This Hon orable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, May 2th, at 9:30 A. M. 1950 f * et LL IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -+- MAY TERM, 1950 Wednesday, May 24th , 1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, May 24th, 1950. Jfe>9 /7 / No. 1325 State vs Sinnie C. Brown - No. 1342 state vs Lee Withers No. 1345 State vs Mary Saunders No. 1358 state vs Odell Morrison C=27 ? No. 1323 State vs Lula Mh. Carpenter No. 1348 State vs Neil Wike Nos. 1360,1361, 1362, 1363 and 1364, State - orvin Feimster No. 1367 State vs John H, Tombinson MURDER The defendant through his attorney, Mr. W. R. Battley enters a plea of involuntary manslaughter, which plea is accepted by the State. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the State Prison at Raleigh for a term of not less than EIGHTEEN MONTHS nor more than THREE YEARS. ASSAULT Continued by consent POSSESSING LIQUOR Continued by consent BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant having heretofa@e entered a plea of guilty as eres the judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the comaon jail of Iredell County and work under the supervision of the State llighway and Public Works Commission, for a period of TWELVE MONTHS. The road sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation for the period of THREE YEARS. | .URBER Continued DRIVE DRUNK Continued for the Defendant FORGERY The defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Capias BURGLARY Continued eet ae NaS A SELES aC real IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Wednesday, May 2hth, 1950 No. 4810 Thomas Max McLeod Vs. ffary Ruth licLeod NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court, May Term, 1950. Thomas Max McLeod Vs. Mary Ruth McLeod 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, am are they now ni and wife, as alleged in the complaint? , ? husbaxd Answer: Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate fromeach other, and have ty lived separate and apart fromeach other for more than two years continuousely pric to the institution of this action? Answer: ‘Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resiént of the State of North Carls for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes ~s ay ars N py ; WUalall Vall iAa, In the Superior Court, — rhein JU io ul COUNTY. May Term, 1950 Thomas Max MeLeod Vs. JUDGMENT Mary Ruth McLeod This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Jourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, William H. Bobbit Presiding. an boboitt, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues Submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and ad judged by the Court that the bonds of matri ; ramony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Thomas Max McLeod, and the defendant, kh: ] ndant, Mary Ruth MeLeod, be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Wm. H. Bobbitt udge Fres ng- This Honorable Court takes a recess until |] - May 29th 1950 at 10:00 O'clock, ionday hiorning, May 29% IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -=- MAY TERM,1950 Monday, May 29th, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 1950 Be it remembered that a Superior Court began and held in and for che County and State aforesaid, on this the 29th day of hay, 1950, at 10:00 o'clock A. M., when and where His Honor William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding and Holding Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Vistrict May Term, 1950 is present and presiding. After the call of the calendar the first day (ionday) was taken up with pre-trial hearings. No cases for trial by jury were set for hearing until Tuesday horning. No. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. R. S. Barkley, Plaintiff, Vs. PRETRIAL ORDER. hae L, Barkley, “efendant. Appearances: For Plaintiff: Land, Sowers * Avery and 2. V. Turlington, Esq. For defendant: Adams, Dearman & winberry. Subject to re-consideration at the trial and upon development of the evidence, the Court settles the issues tentatively as follows: l. Was the plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months and more next preceding the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? 2. were the plaintiff and the defendant married on May 9, 1916, as alleged in the complaint? 3. Did the plaintiff and the defendant separate on September 17, 1946, and have they lived separate and apart from each other continuously since that date, as alleged in the complaint? 4. Was said separation caused by the defendant's wrongful abandonment of the plaintiff, as alleged in the answer? De Was the defendant at the time of the execution of the paper-writing dated June 19, 1948, purporting to be a separation agreement mentally incapable of making such agreement, as alleged in the answer? This the 29th day of May, 1950. Judge Presiding. she ae ae ale ae ae ac Se a a BC a BS 3 NE a 3 3 3 IE HE Ree RecN ee SRCOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 vSwvonday, May 29th, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. R. L. Daniels, Administrator, of s, R. Daniels, Plaintiff, Vs. PRE*TRIAL ORDER lars. Frances Chapman, Defendant. Appearances: Raymer & Raymer for plaintiff. Macon Simons, Esq., and Adams, Dearman & Winberry for defendant, It is stipulated: 1. &. R. Daniels died February 17, 1949. 2. the 1939 Chevrolet Panel Truck and ignition key for same were seized by the Sheriff under claim and delivery proceedings herein on the 6th day of March, 1949, and delivered to the plaintiff under nis $1600 undertaking, with R. L. Daniels oersonally as surety, on March 12, 1949; and at the time of said seizure by the Sheri and said delivery of said personal property to the plaintiff, the reasonable market value of said personal prop orty w 380 2 ° P 1 prop rty was 3600.00. On or before January 7, 1948, &. 2, ) teles "enac j } nv D mn Janiels purchased the 1939 Chevrolet Panel Truck and thereupon became the owner thereof. 3e «2%. 4. Janiels is now the duly qualified and acting administrator of ti &. kt. Janiels, deceased, Subject to reconsideration at the trial and upon development of the evidens settles the issue tentatively as follows: 1. is &. L. Janiels as administrator of the estate of =, R. Janiels, deceas le owner ; j I | ed, the owner and entitled to the possession of the 1939 Chevrolet Panel Truck and ignition key, as alleged in the complaint? lay 30, 1950. Wm. H. Bobbitt JUDGE PREO . This Honorable ¢ s( i e vVourt takes a recess : r ‘ . . h 19) at 9:30 O'clock, cess until Tuesday Morning, lay 30th, ~ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Second Week --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, May 30th, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk. This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, ay 30th, 1950 at 9:30 O'clock. ie De Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open sourt the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for tnis the Second Jleek- May Term, 1950 Iredell County Superior Vourt, to-wit: tT 5. Homer Jacks We. We. Mayhew H. Pless Woodward wayne D. Williams k, L, Laws Lewis H. James L. D. Haigh C. V. Tilley S. C. McCrary Glenn P. Fox Miss Jessie Alexander H, Ae Chambers Ira D. Hefner F. B. Holland Andrew N. Cowles E. ie Hamlet F, 5S. Honeycutt W. A. Little ve C. Kyles Mirs Fred E Cox R, L. Hambright John T. Hartline We F. Hall, Jr. Ralph Brown S$, C. MeCrary was excused by the Court Miss Jessie Alexander was not retumed Mrs Fred E. Cox was excused by Doctor's Certificate Ralph Brown was out of the County The following men constitutes what shall hereinafter be termed as the Divorce Jury #1, to-wit: &. Homer Jacks, R. 1. Laws, H. A. Chambers, Ira D. Hefner, F, S. Honeycutt, R. L. Hambright, Lewis H. James, F. B. Holland, W. W. hayhew, W. A. Little, John T. Hartline, and H. Pless woodward No. 452k Rooswelt saunders DIVORCE- Vs The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled : answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Kosetta Saunders IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Roosevelt Saunders Vs. | ISSUES dosetta Saunders ) Were the plajntiff and the defendant married, and are now husband and wife, as set out in the complaint? Answer Yes II Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina for a period of six months, immediately prior to the filing of the complaint? Answer Yes Iil Has the plaintiff, Roosevelt Saunders, lived separate and apart from tovetta Saunders, the defendant, for a period of two years, immediately prior to be filing of the Complaint in this action? Answer {Yes Tie SUPERLOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, Nay 30th, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 1950 Roosevelt Saunders, | Vs. { JUDGMENT Rosetta saunders | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this, the May Term of Iredell County Superior Court, before his honor William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presid, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court, in favor of the Plaintiff a,d against the defendant, as set out in tie record: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the court that the bonds of natrir), heretofore existing between Roosevelt vaunders, the plaintiff, and Rosetta Saunders, » defendant, be and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Wm, H, Bobbitt JUDGE PReolJING NE BIS DIK IK Ie BIS BIC DIK BYE DK BK 3/K DIK DIK d}k DIC HK BE DIE DIK 2}S BK BIE 31K 2K 2s 2,5 36 96 Lee “oy Salmons Plaintiff DIVORCE Vs. | | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empebeli | answers the issues submitted to it as follows: vhelby Jean Collier Salmons Defendant H CAROLINA NORT eet T KT er) ‘ “T Tr\t fry IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 1950 Lee Roy 3almons Plaintiff Vs. Shelby Jean Collier Jalmons Defendant 1. Did ti j , id the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the cm answer: Yes he H a4 } 5 Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for ae of more than two years as alleged in the Complaint? answer: Yes » a i 3 as the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Cara for a period of 1! more than one year next preceeding this action as alleged in the Coap Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tyesday, May 30th, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Lee Roy Salmons I Plaintiff I { JUDGMENT VSe shelby Jean Collier Salmons { Defendant | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, iilliam H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding and a jury at the May Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been properly served with process by publication and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the Jury, 1. were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully intermarried as alleged in the Complaint? answer: Yes 20 Has the plaintiff been a bona fida resident of the state of North Carolina for one year next preceeding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceeding the bringing of this action? answer: Yes Now therefore on motion of Land, Sowers & avery, attorneys for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, Lee Roy Salmons be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Shelby Jean Collier Salmons, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. Tuis the 30th day of May, 1950. wm, H obbitt am H. BO ; Judge Presiding He st J, tev, 4 he he oh ale oe ate she ste steste ste she sie ste sic aie aie se ak 3K ste sic sie s'c ahs tie tic akc 3 se se sc se se ae se se ae se ae ae see ae a ae ee A A EB A A A EB 2 EEE EUR RRRDEEREETEN =e wr gales ae Oe eae See ae Se oe a Ee ~ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, May 30th, 1956 Noe 4823 Grace Meadows Hall DIVORCE ™ The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and VS. answers the issues submitted to it as fellos - We Hall NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court, May Term, 1950. Grace headows Hall Vs. | « We Hall l. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now ausband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2, Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separa and apart from each other fa more than two years prior to the institution of this ection, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carly for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. May Term, 1950 NORTH > aROLINA, IRSVDELL COUNTY. Grace Meadows Hall VSe « We Hall Tunis cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Super Jourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, William H. Bobbitt, /u Presiding, and a jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by sourt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the recor it it therefore, ordered, and adjudged b: the Court that the bonds of 1itrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Grace Meadows Hall, and the jefendant o Me 2 ’ Hall, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff 8 Wm. H. Bobbitt a udge Fresiding- ME FE BC OK 9K 3k Se aie She aie aie ale ake tc ate ale ate ate ate ste 5 ‘ te IB RK IK BIR ae Dix ic De 3g Bie aie 3fe ic 2) aie a ale ae aie afe ale afe aie afe ate a}e ae ae af 2)< Bix 26 2k 246 ranted an absolute divorce from the defendant, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SZCOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, May 30th, 1950 ? oF te sos > John We Massey DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1, being duly sworn and empanelled Vse answers the issues submitted to it as follows: gyelyn M. Massey NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT John WW. Massey VS. | { ! | Evelyn MW. hassey 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? answer: ‘Yes 2, Hasthe plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceeding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes NORTH CARULINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY John W. Massey I Vs. i Evelyn li, assey | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, William H, Bobbitt, Judge Fresiding and a jury at the May term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that defendant has been properly served with process by publication, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: : l. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the c omplaint? Answer: "Yes." ; 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the state of North Varolina for one year next preceding the bringing of this action? answer: "Yes." : 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes." Now, therefore, on motion of Macon M. Simons, attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged and decreal that the plaintiff John We Massey be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Evelyn M. Massey, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action ® be taxed by the clerk. Wm, H. Bobbitt JUDGE PRESIDING This the 30th day of May, 1950. MEE 2k 2K IK she se se he Be a i kM BME ENE AC EE Ie HEE NEI KK 2S Me Mee Be 24x 2)< BS AK Is IN THE SUPERIOR, COURT, | S5COND WEEK --- MAY TERM aC END sday, hay 30th, 1950 No. 4832 es Lynch ” , DIVORCE ; V The Divorce Jury #1", being duly swrn and 7 em answers the issues submitted to it as follows: panelled Helen Lynch IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 1950 NOR IRE! TH CAROLINA DELL COUNTY James Lynch —— Se | Helen Lynch 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the otate of North Carolina fo six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes. 3. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint’ answer. YeS. NORTH CARULINA IN THE SUPZRIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY hay Tern, 1950 James Lynch Vs. Helen Lynch This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the hay Term, 190 puperi C n ea superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge iresiding, an tay a ; : , residing, anda jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted t? it in the favor of the plaintiff and acainst the defendant, as fully appears i the record; it is, therefore, ordered, adjudged anddecreed that the bonds of matri® he xistince retofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same ar hereby diss ioe : it eby dissolved, and tae plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from defendant. This the 30th day of May, 1950. wm, H, Bobbitt i Rio IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -e-- MAY TERN, 1950 ~“Tyesday, May 30th, 1950 , 113 “YA y Small Greene DIVORCE | Vs The Yivorce Jury #1", being duly swrn and empanedled Se answers the issues submitted to it as follows; Greene Doroth Tsaac Shairl yoRTH CAROLINA IREJELL COUNTY IN THE SUPHRIOR COURT jorothy Small Greene Vse | Isaac Shairl Greene | The following issues were submitted to the jury which answered as follows: 1. Has the plaintiff, Dorothy small Greene, been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer Yes. 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other on 3rd day of April, 1925 as alleged in the complaint? Answer YeS. 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant separated from each other during November 1926, and have since that time continously lived separate and apart for two consecutive years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREJELL COUNT Dorothy wmall Greene Plaintiff Vs. Isaac Shairl Greene Defendant This cause coming on for hearing upon the summons and complaint and no answer being filed, and it appearing that the complaint and summons were filed on March 3, 1950, and that the defendant, Isaac Shairl Greene, was served by publication of proper notice in the Jtatesville Daily Record as required by law, and this cause being tried by the Court and jury, and the jury having answered tie issues in favor of the plaintiff, es follows: l. Has the plaintiff, Jorothy Small Greene, been a resident of the otate of North Carolina for six months next preceding the instmtion of this action? ‘answer: Yes. 2. \iere the plaintiff and defendant married to each other on the 3rd day of April, 1925, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. y 36 have the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other during ovenber, 1926 and hwe since that time continously lived separate and apart for two cons.cutive years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: ‘.3. wHEREFORE, upon motion of Edw. Me Hairfield, Jr., Attorney, for the plaintiff, it is ordered adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to a divorce absolute and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be declared forever void. Wm. H. Bobbitt udge ho ng Cour Judicial District at Iredell County,N. C. MEM EM HEM NET ese He SSSI MR HI ANIA IHM RES IH ATER TIE Hee He wee He He HH HH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT E SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 SECOND WEEK SeeeNAY TERM. 1950 Tuesday, May 30th, 1950 Tuesday, May 30th,1950 No. 4810 J. Fe McNeely No. 4835 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Ray V. Lail dar DIVORCE 4 The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and em i Oe answers the issues submitted to it as follows: panelled ” Norma N. McNeely WORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY sarah Lail IN THE SUPERIOR co IN THE SUP#RIOR COURT S RIOR COURT MAY TERM, NORTH CAROLINa | inAY TERM, 1950 IREDELL COUNTY a. %, ieNeely | Ray V. Lail Vs. SSUE: Vs. | Norma N. tcleely 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? sarah Lail 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Com; Yes. Answer Yes >, Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and have they lived separate ~e the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Jarolina for: a m each other, for more than two years immediately preceeding tie filing next preceding the filing of this Complaint: and apart fro answer. eSe of the complaint in this action? 3. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived sex answer Yes seriod of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? 3. Has the plaintiff been «4 resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceeding the filing of the complaint in this action? Yes. answer Yes HOH —N—§_§_#9“>214#>2"n™Oo0"-"7w7."—"-"".v--wm-"-—— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PAY TERM, 1950 I | | Jause coming on to be heard and being heard at the “ay Tern, 1950 © superior Court of lredell County, before His Hondy William H. Bobbitt, Judge free idine a : : ‘ . : iding, ad a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it i the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the reco and it appearing to the Court that there were born since the marriage of the plain and the defendant, three children, namely: Linda Joyce Lail, Judy Logenia Lail am Sue Ellen Lail, and that the defendant herein has the care and custody of said ctl and it further appearing to the Court and the Court finds as a fact that the defe# ; ~ 4 a al . is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the minor chilere?, namely: Linda Joyce Lail, Judy Logenia Lail and Sue Ellen Lail, and that the best in S sai j terest of said minors would serve by being in the custody of their mother, she being d : eing found to be a fit person for the custody of said minors. It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of natris® heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are heréll dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce fro Lt is £ Qj: it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, Sarah Lail, is hereby awarded full and complete care, custody and control of the minor ohilé® amely: g ] namely: Linda Joyce Lail, Judy Logenia Lail and Sue Ellen wail. This cause, in sof : J retained f . ar as it relates to the custody of the minot . ained for further orders, This the 30th day of iiay ,1950 wns He BOUray SHE See She Se Se She ate ate ate ste ste ate ate ste ste ate BPE BRK HE BE Die 3c ac aie Bie ae ale ake ake ake ale ate ate ate she she ste ate diese se ae ae sea ae a af af ae Be CAE m the defed® be at? hi dred)’ NORTH CAROLIN«a IN THs SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1950 J. F. “cheely Vs. Norma N. leNeely Thiscause coming on to be heard at this term of Iredell County Superior Court before His Honor, Judge wm. H. Bobbitt, and a jury and being heard and the jury having answered the Issues as set out in the record. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, It is further ordered and adjudged that the cost of this action be taxed according to the statutes of North Carolina. se se se se se ate sea eae ee eae a eae A NE BE Na HE 3 HE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, May 30th, 1950 - SI of jartha Heglar Dorton DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sw ee answeres the issues submitted to i folder. me Sharles WwW. Jorton : NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR CO MAY TERM, 1950 - l.artha Heglar Dorton Vs. Charles ... Vorton 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint’? Answer. Yes. 2, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more thai six months next preceding tne filing of this Vomplaint? Agswer : Yes. 3. Did the defendant separste from the plaintiff and have they lived and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complainti In the Superior May Term, 1950 Vs. . Jort on This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the hay Term, 1950 Superior C I ’ : : ourt of Iredell County, before His Honor, william H. Bobbitt, Judge ‘re® and eae ju a i : ee — jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the ta of the plainti 2 pea = plaintiff and against thedefendant, as fully appears in the record; and 1 — to the Court that there was born of the marriage of the plaintiff and ‘it defendant a child, Charles Ray Dorton, and that the plaintiff herein has the care custody of said child; and it further appearing to the Court, and the Court fints * fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and cost of the minor child, Charles Ray Dorton, and that the best interest of said minor * be serve by being in the custody of his mother, she being found to be 4 gat pense’ the custody of said minor. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the ponds of matri h tof * eretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, aid the same are here! m the defer” ar port™ dissolved » and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce fro It is furth urther ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Martha Heel b int e and she is hereby awarded full and complée care, custody and control of the » child, Charles Ray Dorton, Cy wi w ont N OR U SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, ay 30th, 1940 It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, Charles wW, Dorton shall have the right to visit said minor child, Charles Ray Dorton, at such time and upon such occasions as will net interfere with the normal life and activity of said minor child and the members of the house- hold where said child resides. This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, is retained for further orders. This the 30th day of May, 1950. \.m, H, Bobbitt JUDG PReOLDING. No. 4850 Curtis Campbell es P DIVORCE VS. The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Pleete lay Campbell NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. Curtis Vampbell Vs. Fleete May Campbell l. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Yes 2. Has the plaintiff lived in the state of North Carolina for six months preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, May 30th, 1940 In the Superior Court, May Term, 1950 NORTH C..ROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Curtis Campbell Vs. Fletta may Campbell This cause coming on to be heurd before the undersigned Judge holding the recular liay, 1950 Term of Iredell County Superior Court, and a jury, and the sury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and o-ainst the defendant, as appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged thet the bonds of matr imony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defeidant be, and the same are uerecy dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an bsolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, um, H, Bobbitt JUDGE PREOIDING. empansalled answers the issues submitted to it a8 | The Jivorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and follows: iathryn Carter Tevepaush mtr . oY Te sth vel Lidea IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 1950 AN OVO COUNTY Garland LI, Tevepaugh Vse | varter Tevepaugh 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the answer. Yes. ) é. tas the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina fo wore tian six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? answer: Yes, 3. Did the defendant Separate from the plaintiff and have they Lived separat « é C 5 : i e and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Comphaint: ahswer, Yes. Anerid Ome IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-- MAY TER, 1950 Tuesday, May 30th, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court, May Term, 1950 IREDELL COUNTY. ’ garland L. Tevepaugh Kathryn Cartner Tevepaugh This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the lay Term, 1950 Superior Court of Iredell County, before iis Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; and it appearing to the Court that there was born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant, a child, Jo-Ellen Tevepaugh, and that the defendant , herein hes the care and custody of said child; and it further aspearing to the Court and the Court finds as a fact that the defendant is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the minor child, Joe-llen Tevepaugh, and that the best interest of said minor would serve by being in the custody of her mother, sie being found to be a fit person for t.e custody of said minor. lt is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that tue bonds of matrimony neretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defem ant, kathryn Carter Tevepaugh, be and she is hereby awarded full and complete care, custody and control of the minor child, Joe-Ellen Tevepaugh. This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, is retained for further orders. This the 30th day of May, 1950. wm. H. Bobbitt UGL Abo +L se see see sae se eae ae Me ae a ae ANE RCA a I RO A I EE I IE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, may 30th, 1950 No. 853 Margaret Eagle, by her next | c. 6. Little, I Plaintiff i ; () DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sw ‘ ’ orn and empanelled answers the issues submi ; follows: mAtGed to it us friend, Vs. Wallace agle, Defendant IREDELL COUNTY’ URT ilargaret jagle, by her next friend, C. U. *ittle, | laintiff Vse wallace Eagle, Defendant l. were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the cox);: fk PP AGen answer: Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a vona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six (6) months next preceding the bringing of this action? answer: Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart fron each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? answer: Yes COURT margaret sagle, by her next | triend, U. J. Little, Plaintiff wallace Lagle, Vefendant I Vs. Tiils cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, William H. Bobbit, Judge Presiding and a jury at the Spring Term of the Superior vourt of Ipedell County, and it appearing to the court that the defendant has beet properly served with process, and the following issues having been submitted to 2 aR RWOREE Ay Whe jury: - Were tue plainti } =) i " answer: tYest aintiff and the defendant married as alleged in me 0 for six (6) months next | preceding eae hana: "Yee" eding the bringing of this action? "4 Ha ‘ . . ae 3 ave the plsineist and the defendant lived separate and apart fro © other for two years nex r ing food ay Inawer: "Yea" ° eceding the bringing of this action? Now i a ow Therefore, on motion of Ray Jennings, Attorney for the Plaintiff, *° ordered, adjudged, and defend i f ant is hereby declared dissolved and the plaintiff is granted an = divorce from the defer ant. An tit i 3 aq it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this 3 to be taxed by the Clerk, This the 30th day of May, 1950 Wm. He Bobbitt ~JUDG! : fas the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the state of North Cat “ ° wv and declared that the marriage entered into between the plain IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-- MAY TERM 1950 Tuesday, May 30th, 1950 ‘ lo. 4860 n c kman glsie Kir DIVORCE . Vs. The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: charles H. Kirkman NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY In the Superior Court May Term, 1950 glsie Kirkman Vs. charies H. Kirkman 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in tue complaint? Answer: Yes > Have t.e plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for ~e two years jmaediately preceding tae comencement of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state of North Carolina for more than six months next preceeding the comuencement of this action? Answer: Yes In the Superior Court lay Term, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Zlsie Kirkman | VBe } Charles H. Kirkman, | JUDGHENT OF ABSOLUTE DIVORCE This cause coming on to be heard at the regular tay, 1950, Term of Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard before the undersigned Judge presiding and a jury and the jury having answered the following issues »s indicated, and as appears in the record, viz: ; 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Answer: 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for two years imuediately prece@ding the commencement of this action? answer: 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of theState of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the comiencement of this action. Answer: omplaint? It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are hereby dissolved and that the plaintiff bee, and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Wm. H. Bobbitt bo . sess se ese ca Me Re RM HC RMN IATA AE IN THE SUPERIOR COUR? ” COND WEEK --- MAY TERM oe tuesday, May 30th, 1950 1950 No. 4861 Frances Caldwell Javis | DIVORCE r At, bel wi Tue Divorce vury i eing duly sworn and | answers the issues submitted to it as flim: Vse Lewis 1... Javis NORTH CAROLINA, ARNAMTT ar INTY IREDELL VUUaN ° In the Superior Court. lay Term, 1950. Frances Jaldwell Davis Vs Lewis W. Vavis | 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 2, Did the plaintiff ani defendant separate, and have they lived separz: and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institution of this .ction, as alleged in the complaint? answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a vonifide resident of the otate of North Sarolina for more than six months before the comuencerent of this action, as allez in the complaint. nswer; Yes. horth Carolina, In the Superior Court. iredell County. lay Term, 1950. Frances Caldwell Davis Vs. JUDGNENT Lewis \.. Davis This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court infavor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: it is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by te Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Frances Caldwell Davis, defendant, Lewis W. Davis, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the phaint is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. wm. H, Bobbitt udge Presiding. and IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, may 30th, 1950 No. 4853 ORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Vourt IREDELL COUNTY May Term, 1950 Kalph Be Teaster Vs. JUDGMENT Fern Benfield Teaster This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, William H. Bobbitt, Judge presiding at the May 1950 Tern of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon a motion for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees filed by the defendant in the above entitled action; and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff instituted an action for an absolute divorce and that thereafter the defendant filed answer and by way of further defense and for affirmative relief asked for alimony without divorce, and upon the call of the matter for hearing the plaintiff demurred ore tenus to the defendants counter action for affirma- tive relief for that a counter action for alimony without divorce washot litigable in an action for absolute divorce and the Court being of the opinion that said demurrer should be sustained; And it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit in this actipn; and it further appearing to the Court that the QO defendant is entitled an allowance for her attorney, J. 4%. Lewis; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed tuat plaintiffs demurrer to defendants counter action be and the same is hereby sustained; It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and he is hereby allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit and said action hereb, nonsuited. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff shall pay tie cost of this action including the sum of $25.00 to be disbursed to mr. J. G. Lewis attorney for the defendant. This the 30th day of Miay, 1950. wm. H. Bobbitt DGs PRs DMA A OLED = = ~ — SS = = en : Tees . . ven nero : oe vi — = : 2 agree a 2 zs = SS SSE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 ‘Mmesday, May 30th, 1950 No. 4854 Gene Donald McLain DIVORCES ¢ ee Ht Vs. The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn ani ema, answers the issues submitted to it as follows: © artha hartin NcLain, by : her Guardian ad Litem, william I, ward, ur. H CAROLINA IN THE SUPLRIOR COURT JELL COUNTY MAY TERI. ene Jonald MeLai VS. |.artha !.artin MeLain, by her Guardian ad Liten, William I, \.ard, Jr. l. were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint: plaintiff and defendant separate and have they lived separate other, for more than two years immediately preceeding the filix: laint in this action? resident of the State of North Carolina for of the complaint in this action? CHE HI IE MI IIA I TE IE I HR AVVUILYw ___ tne Jivorce Jury ;1", being duly duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: utULINA , _ wrD ryt ASTIN rien? IN THE OUPERLOR COURT 4JUNILe Barkley . laintiff VSe hae L. Barkley, | Vefendant .. Vee the « ee ; ¢ was the plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina for six montns and more next nr ine j ; text preceding the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint? inswer: Yes, 5 in the complaint? answer; Yes 36 Vid ti Ww) Le i j ; i@ plaintiff and the defendant separate on February 17; 1946, ™ have they lived separate r and apart from each other continuously since that date alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes we ry y 4 ~ re. re the plaintiff and the defendant married on Nay 9, 1918, as alle IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Tuesday, may 30th, 195 4. was said separation caused by the plaintiff's wrongful abandon- nent of the defendant, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No. (Directed by Court) 5. was the defendant at the time of the execution of the paper- writing dated June 19, 1948, purporting to be a Separation agreement mentally incapable of making such agreement, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No. (Jirected by Court) Allie Brown Johnson vs. Charles \\. Johnson, ---- Continued Odella Walker vs. Ernest \alker, ------= Continued Allen tade Shue, BNF, vs. Betty Pope shue, Continued Jennie S. Wilson vs. willie Lee wilson, Vontinued Jlla L. Wallace vs. Harvey i.. \.allace, Continued Vireinia R. Wilkinson vs. James H, \.ilkinson, Sr.,--- Continued Re L. Daniels, Admr of i. &%. Daniels vs. Urs. Frances Chapman, = vontinued for the defendant Rochlin vs. P. S. est Construction co., Continued ‘ Ty No, SP=3359 NOp nh a a NORTH CAROLINA, SUI ERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. WAY TERM, 1950 vs Fe Bennett, et al ix Parte Jury swom and empanelled: £&, Homer Jacks, &. L. Laws, H. A. Chambers, PS, Honeycutt, R. L. Hambright, Lewis H. James, “. A. Little, John T. Hartline, Ne Pless woodward, L. D. Haigh, Andrew N. Cowles and W. C. Kyles. Pending trial the Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, “ay jist, 1950 at 9:30, 4 7A Otet ——ee JUD PREOLDIN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --= HAY : 19%0°~ ‘jednesday, May 3 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on wednesday horning, hay 31st, at 9:30 O'clock. ERIOR COURT J. P. Bennett and wife, Uthel Bennett, et al. Parte ")id EB, lu. Goodin at the public sale held May 7, 1949, have notice tht serty described as second Tract for which he bid j4,000.00 was being offers IPS 7 r Noel R.S. woodhouse, Comissioner in a judicial sale under order of lleged by said Commissioner in his amended |.otion?" In the Superior ay Term, 1950 é y , + . ennett Sennett, mm This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge am a july; nd being heard at tuis term of the Court, and the following issue having been bmitted to the Jury and answered as follows, to-wit: Did 2. 1. Goodin at the public sal that nahn ; ee i oublic sale held i.ay 7 oan’ have notice bale by | Coperibed in Second Tra ct for which he bid »4,000.00 Was being offered i seen oy tore te os woodhouse, Commissioner in a judicial éale under order of 0 y said Com dssioner in his amended liotion? answer; No. it appearing to the Court that the issue was answered in favor of the a nds sf . : + ei defendant, ©. hi. yoodin, and asainst the plaintiffs, Noel R. 5. Yoodhouse, om and the petitioners in the above entitled special proceeding: IT 13, THEREFORE, ON MOTION OF COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT, CONSIDERED) © DJUIGED Al DECREZD That the plaintiffs do not recover anything of the defe this case, and it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, ® a bias Goodin, is hereby discharged of any obligation whatever by reason of his pid on? second Tract of land made on the 7th day of May, 1949. his It is further ordered that the plaintiffs be taxed with th ; This the 3lst day of May, 1950. eae, 449 BEBE 3c Bie shea ac aie ve at ‘ PE DE DK BEDE BE 3 Dae Re aie Me Me Ne aie aie ale ale aie aie ake le ai aie aie alc fe ale alc o,ccals afc ake a}e aie afc als ofc BY AS BIS 21594 ie action. No + 47 10- ndant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «= MAY BER, 13200 ‘Wednesday, May 31st, No. 8 89 NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL .estmoreland by her Next Friend | s Plyl Ee westmoreland, Vse ’ J, He westmoreland ; This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, william i. Bobbitt, Judge presiding at the ay Term, 1950 of Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the court from the statements iiade to the court by counsel for slaintiff and counsel for defendant that the case is one in wiich there may be cvestionable liability or negligence on the Part athe defendant, and that by reason of the questionably liablity the plaintiff, through her counsel, am the defendant, nave agreed to settle all matters and differences existing between them, and in which the defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 500.00 as compensation for her injuries and to say the entire hospitel bill in the amount of 3216.0, and it appearing that the defendant has paid the hospital bill in full. It further appears to the court from the examination of the plaintiff and the letter from her doctor that the plaintiff has recovered from her injuries and has resumed her normal activities, ana that the settlement made between tue plaintiff and defendant is fair and reasonable and for her best interests. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the payment of 3216.00 heretofore made by the defendant for the benefit of the plaintiff as a part of her compensation is approved, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the additional sum of $500.00, and that the defendant be taxed with the costs of this action. \PPROVED= Vim. H, Bobbitt JUDGE PRESIDING urs. Hi, &. Westmoreland, R, A. Collier 4 for defendant aT. V. Turlington atty for Plainvif? a DIS DS 2K i DIE OK BS DIK BIS BIE IK BK DS BK DIK BIS IE AE AE AE AE AS Next Friend BR HS 2S BE AE IE DK 2 Continued C. B. yers & wife vs. D O Cowan, Jr., et al, lo, ~ bs : ’ . 0. 47ll- C. B. lyers & wife, vs. W. B. Crowson, et al, Continued c dic ate aie she she ale ate aie ac hc aie 3}e ay 2¢ 2 36 aie afc aie dic sik afc ale Beas Be 3k 26 3K lio, 4681 NORTH C AROLINA shy IREDELL COUNTY? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MAY TERM, 1950 Big : i Jury sworn and emp&nelled to-wit: E. Homer Jacks, r “Ys ro <2 oe R. L. Laws, R. L. Hambright, Lewis H, James, W. A. Little, J. By} Hyers mA L. &. oe ah, Andrew N. Cowles, W. C. Ky yles, We Pe Hall, Jr dj we ; Cc. Vv Be e J. B. Myers’ \holesale Co Wayne D. Williams, C. V. Tilley and © a \ Pending trial the Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, June lst, at 9:30, ArH ti, tae act PB BAL GAs mal oO ee a a - ——— ; = el pAPS oe or = = SS ee = = case : — 7 . ae 2 * <- Far aS : oe ee a on a OE =, . = IN THE SUPERIOR "es SECOND WEEK ee- mAY TERM 50 ommursday, June lst, 1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday hors: June lst, 1950 at 9:30 O'clock. Noe 854 amt AlN V.isads.t In the Superior Court + , UNTY | 1] 4d ded ded 4\/ Var e .r ay Term, 1950 tene Donald ...cLain Lartha artin heLain, by her Guardian id Liten, William I, ‘ard, dr. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Iredell County Superior Sourt before His Honor, Judge im. H. Bobbitt, and a jury and being heard and the ving answered the lssues as set out in the record. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony hereto- fore existing between the plaintiff and defendant »e and tlie same are hereby disso nd the plaintiff is cranted an abolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered and decreed that William I. ard, dr., be paid tes of 95 ) for his services as Guardian Ad Litem, and that the costs of this actioz: taxed by the Clerk in accordance with the statutes of the tate of North Carolina, dime H. Bobbitt Judge "residing IN THE SUPERIR COURT. WAY TER, 1950. Re it. Campbell Vs. Johnsie Campbell “His cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Presiding Judge ¥* Lotion and it annearin<e , ' s ; Z ti t appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have agree settle tue iss le hem wi e issues between them whereby the defendant, Johnsie Campbell, agrees release ond dischare } pinghep 4 iss Aascnarge the plaintiff, R. i.. Campbell, of and from any and all cla p for support and me a : . ne w P} and maintenance for herself and minor child, “rank Campbell, which $* has or may n of? aave against the plaintiff, R. hh. Campbell, for and in consideratio payment of the sum of }1,200.00 and Court costs to the Clerk of the superior Cort” Iredell ent? vounty, North Carolina, on or before August 8th, 1950, for the use ent of the sai hnsie ¢ e] id Johnsie Campbell; that the plaintiff waives further notice in the caus for hearing. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1950 Thursday, June lst, 1950 It is fherefore on motion, ordered that this cause be continued for hearing ti] August 9th, 1950, in the Superior Court of Iredell County, at wiich time, in un 4 the event the plaintiff has failed to comply with the agreement set forth above, this cause shall be heard without further notice and without prejudice on account of said agreement. wm. H. Bobbitt Judge Presiding. By Consent of: a, Me Campbell Plaintiif Johnsie vampbell Jerendant (See Issues and judgment page 126) Noe SP=3359 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY hay Term, 1950 J. P, Bennett and wife, sthel Bennett, et al, x Parte. It having been adjudged on the 3lst day of may, 1950, that the movants do not recover anything of the respondant in this c ause and that the respondant is discharged of any obligation by reason of his bid on the 7th day of May, 1949; lo the judgment of the Court, the movants except for errors assigned and to be assigned, in open Court amd give notice of appeal to the supreme Court of North Carolina, further notice waived. Movants are allowed forty (40) days in which to make up and serve case on appeal, and respondant is allowed thirty (30) days thereafter to make up and serve countercase or file exceptions thereto. Appeal bond in the sum of Une fundred (3100.00) Dollars is adjudged sufficient. wm. H, Boobitt Judge Presiding He she she ae ak aie aie ais ax 2c 246 Bie Bie Be ME Bx Die AE IK 2K 2K 9K x los 1325 MURDER wsate The judgment heretofore pronounced is hereby striken out and ee in lieu thereof the judgment of the Court is as follows: “innie Brown Upon the defendant's plea of guilty of involuntary manslaughter, the judgnent of the Court is that the defendant be confined | P in the common jail of Iredell County for the t erm of EIGHTEEN MONTHS, to be assigned to work there under the supervision of the Jailer and the Board of County Commissioners of redell County. Hal i Ha i) —————— eee laeeceealaanemelas i | } | 5 f ; ' IN THE silyl Sep 3ECOND WEEK -<- MA ERM ev ehur sday , june 1st, $50 No. 4681 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT nA ‘DI InEDSLL COUNTY MAY TiuRb., 1950 Big Jack fanufacturing Company Inc., Plaintiff vs J. Be wyers, Trading as B tyers Wholesale Uo., Defendant L. Did the plaintiff, on march 5, 1948, sell and deliver to the defeni. ant overalls at the price of 31625.00, as alleced in the complaint? Yes the plaintiff and the defendant thereafter arree that the plain from tae defendant at invoice price merchandise theretofore de- vintiff to the defendant and credit same on defendant's account the plaintiff, as alleged in the answer? NO. 3. If so, what was the value of the merchandise, if any, shipped by the plaintiff in pursuance of such agreement? if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Thi: = ne ( ‘nis Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, June and, 1 at 9:30 Otclock, ABH Gitte IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1950 Friday, June 2nd, 1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Friday morning, June 2nd, 1950 at 9:30 O'Clock. No. 4813 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY liay Term, 1950 carolina Roofing & siding vompany, Inc., Plaintiff We VSe James ames Mills and wife Lillian F,i.ills Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before llis Honor william H. Sobbitt, Judge ?residing at the lay 1950 Term of the superior vourt of Iredell Count:, and it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 19th day of January, 1950 and that said sumions torether with a copy of said complaint was served on the defendants on the 20th day of January, 1950; and it further appearing to the Court that no answer, uemurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the deféndants and no extension of time to file pleadines has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired, and it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that this cause of action is based upon an express contract wherein the plaintiff was to perform certain work and furnish certain materials in repairing and improving the building located on the premises described in the complaint and that the defendants agreed to pay therefore the sum of 3350.00 with interest thereon from April 22nd, 1949, until paid; And it further appearing that the defendants have paid the sum of j}4i,.00, leaving a balance due of 300.00 with interest thereon from April 22nd, 1949, until paid; And the plaintiff having introduced in evidence its notice and claim of lien as filed in the office of the Clerk of superior Sourt of Iredell County and appearing of record in lien book #1, at page #159; and it appearing from said record and the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff filed its notice and claim of lien on the llth day of August, 1949 and that said notice and claim of lien sets forth that the work was performed and the materials were furnished between the 18th day of .pril, 1949 and the 22nd day of April, 1949 and the amount claimed vy reason of the work performed and the materials furnished and for which the lien was filed was $306.00 with interest thereon from the 22nd day of April,1949- It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed: 1. That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of 9306.00 with interest thereon from tiie 22nd day of April, 1949 until paid. 2. That said judgment be and the s ame is hereby declared to be a lien *sainst the property described in plaintiffs complaint and that said lien against Said property dates from the 16th day of April, 1949. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 3 SUPURIO! SECOND WEEK ras MAY Tee 1950 SECOND WEER moe she RG OURT 5 Friday, June 2nd, 195 Fkiday, June 2nd, 1940 but that the same shall be paid to him by the Clerk of this Court upon his 3. That W. Kk, Battley be and he is hereby appointed Commissioner to ge statement with the Clerk of this Court : : filing his the land descrided in t.e complaint to satisfy this lien and the Said \, Rp Bats) a : ; * Zattle IT IS, TH2REFORE, BY AND WITH THE CONSENT OF THE PLAINTIFF, AND THE is hereby directed to expose said land to sale at public auction for Cash after 4, ts a ate 7 =e CONSENT OF LEWIS, LEWIS AND HEORICK, ATTORNEYS FOR THE PLAINTIFF, AND ADAL.S, and proper advertisement and to apply the proceeds of said sale to the payment of . DEARMAN AND WINBERRY, ATTORNEYS FOR THE DSPENDANT, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED oA SOY all specific liens asainst said property in order of their priority, and to pay : ; : AND DECREED: it any, after deducting the cost of the sale, to the defendants herein ’ e. That the plaintiff have and recover from the defendant in this surplus, i That this cause be and the same is hereby transferred to the Cle : action, in full and complete settlement of all matters and things arising in this of Court of Iredell County for such orders as may be necessary incident to the s2. im 7 action, the sum of Two thousand “orty Dollars (02,040.00), the same to be paid of the property. into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of tredell Count. , and to be for the cost of tiis action to be taxed by the Clerk, : ‘ disbursed by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County as follows: is, the 2nd day of June, 1950, / ae c ? —— - : : Ae To Davis Hospital, statesville, N. vey tor medical services rendered wm, H. Bobbitt ° : o my rT) 4, * Judge resi ing to the plaintiff, the sum of Forty-seven Dollars (347.00). B To Jr. Ae 4. Coles the amount due him for medical services rendered /@ to the plaintiff, as shown by his statement to be filed with the Clerk of this Court. C, That the remainder of the said sum of Two Thousand Forty Vollars ws ; . : * KA 0 NO Ds > t lz . . : T yi : . , } H . , A S In the Superior Court (52,040.00) be paid to the plaintiff and Lewis, Lewis and edrick, Attorneys for ay Term, 195 the plaintiff. an ul ? JV the costs of this action be taxed against the defendant. end day of June, 1950, CONSEN JUGhENT sie ‘ , LONSENT JUNGHENT Wm. H. Bobbitt Judge Presiding ‘heatre vorporation, Jefendant, sonsented to: | | | Honor, Roxie T, Lazenby cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His , Blaintiff “9 vOobltt, Judge Presiding at the | ay Term, 1950 Iredell County Superior _ bie Hy : | seis, Lewis and Hedrick ‘i aring to the Court from the Statement of Lewis, Lewis and Hedrit: attomeys for the Plaintif? by J. G. Lewis Adams, Dearman & winberry a plaintiff ara f Lar a Der AY "vy t.'2 , for the I , adams, Dearman and \.inberr Attorneys fo » , Vs Attorneys for the Jefendant the defendant has arpeed to pay, and the plaintiff has agreed to ecept in full and complete settlement of all matters and things arising in the «0 ntitled ction, the sum of Two Thousand Forty Dollars ($2,040.00), and the defen iy the costs of this action, and that the said sum of Two Thousand Forty Dollars (32,040.00) and the Costs of tiis action to be paid by the defendant are a full a sonplete settlement of all matters and things arising in this action. it further appears tothe Court from statement of counsel for the plait id defendant that Davis llospital, vtatesville, N. C., Dr. A. L. Coles, Stabesti N. C., and Dr, Harry vinkler, Charlotte, N. C., have rendered medical services o — Wiich are a lien on the recovery in this action, and it ee to the Court that the amount due Davis Hospital for services rendered to the ple is Forty-seven Jollars (347.00), and from the statement of counsel for the plait pis; } | He ink that Dr. Harry Winkler has been paid by the plaintirr for services rendered bY rf } r 0 50h and that the amount due to pr, Ae Le Coles for services rendered by him wn” IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --=- MAY TERM, 1950 Friday, June 2nd, 1950 IN THE SUPERIOR Court, NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Roxie T, Lazenby, Plaintiff, VS. Statesville Theater Corporation, PREeTRIAL ORDER Defendant. , earances: For Plaintiff: Lewis, Lewis & Hedrick For Defendant: Adams, Vearman & \inberry. It is stipulated: 1. The plaintiff is a citzen and resident of Iredell County, North Cardix fhe defendant is a corporation created, organized and «xisting under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Carolina, having its principal place of business i: at the times mentioned in the complaint was engaged in the Ps ‘ . ‘ msl tatesville, | Jey and ~ ~e 2 . ea ner . ah sawn ctimesm 2 -? ¢ ™ 5 ; } peration of movins picture shows in the state Theater building located on the east Yr ’ 1) an LC, ste Ve vouth Center ot statesvi ation at the trial and upon development of the evide.s entatively as follows: injured by the neglirence of the defendant as allect. the plaintiff entitled to recover? wm. H. Bobbitt DGs PasoOLULN non emeanrtan rnin? na ovureasa COURT. laintiff, sarroll Bell, and y -artners Trading uSiness under the name of \..C. Bell & Sons Defendants, . iL ORDER ppearances: For Plaintiff: . Lewis Lewi ® tL : es = id . For defendant: 5, Lewis & Hedrick, and llugh G. Mitchell, 45a. Land, Sowers and Avery, and Z. V. Turlington, 484. It is stipulated: 1. That ti aintiff 4 bie h Carolina; that the PB 2M ney is a citizen and resident of Iredell County, 0... and are partners trading iat ace Te ete e Ane FaRAOeNNe OF Leagene County, Nort y sons, and are engared in esas business under the partnership name of \. C. Bee and other persons for hire ay tiation” plowing and harrowing farm land f > ab) Saud 2. In performi . > a9 5 ’ Min* saic ( ; } —- . wheel oak Or y the parneershioe of the partnership the defendants use . Jn or about the I : ‘ : ; 1 dis th day of April, 199, the defendant, Carrol Bolole drive atruck beloncing t } mn = > & oO th e ne ny 1 * lempleton farn, efendant, and that he’did some work on lir. The 4. On or ab : dit irive a truck Pe, Prod tag 2. oe of A.ril, 1949, the defendant, Carrol ge passed in front of the State ¢ Said partnership towards Statesville from Amity Hil © the said Carrol Bell, was “xperimental Farm; that at the times referred to here, » “as operating said partnership truck as a partner and acelt “ Sald partnership and in ¢f } 4p and in furtherance of the partnership business F ° IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-- MAY TER:., 1950 Friday, Jume 2nd, 1950 Subject to reconsideration at the trial and upon development of the evidence, the Court settles the issues tentatively as follows: 1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as the complaint? : alleged in . If so, did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his s alleged in the answer? 3. what damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Wm. He. Bobbitt JUDGE Viol JING. injury 2 No. 4661 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MAY TER, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA, we IREDELL COUNTY. Big Jack fanufacturing Company, Incorporated. : eas ' Plaintiff. Vse J, B. lyers, T/A Jd. B. Myers, Jnolesale Lompany, | Defendant. and being heard, at the Nay Term, 1950, obbitt, Jude lai f . . issues for the plaintiff, This cause coming ontto be heard, ie Iredell County Superior Court, before tiis Honor, ding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the appears of record in this cause. tT aa Now, therefore, upon the motion of Land, Sowers Avery, Attorneys for the pleintiff it is ordered, edjudged, and decreed, that plaintiff in this action have and recover of the defendant the sum of 3627.62, with interest from the date of this judement together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the clerk. This the 2nd day of June, 1950. im. H. Bobbitt “JUDGE Piso. DING. 5 oars9 . vTthTy . AP: ab iNTRLis ; Upon the coming in of the verdict, the defendant, in apt time moves to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the ereater weignt oi the evidence. Lotion denied. Defendant excepts. Thereupon, the defendant moves to set aside the verdict on account of errors of law comiitted during the progess of the trial. .otion denied. Defendant excepts. The vourt thereupon signed the foregoing judg- went. Tothe judgment as signed the defendant in apt time and in open court excepts and appeals therefrom to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Notice of appeal iven in open court. Further notice waived. By consent and by order of the vourt, the defendant is allowed 40 days from this date to prepare and serve statement of case on appeal, and tie plaintiff is allowed 30 days from tne service of such or lg oh appeal to file exceptions tiereto or to prepare and serve countercase. Appea bond in the amount of ©°100.00 is adjudged sufficient. This 2nd day of June, 1950. Vim H e Bobb itt JUDGE PREOLDING f, aly ae ate le ale fe ate s . 3k Bhs Bik BY D5 BK BE IS BS ARIE OE KAS 3 s* ~ oc ve ve : es 3% s's < vc vc Je x BIS DIE Bk BIS RE BI DIK BK IK 34k BK Yk BRIE 2K 2 if ROK OK RAE alah SECOND WEEK Friday, SUPE Or UU ene MAY TERM 1950 June 2nd, 1950 1.707 Noe 4SS4—4 A NORTH C. ROLINA, VELL COUNTY ile NOe- NORTH C IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL hary barks ner husband, her husband , her husband, ner husb and, dlexan der, dit arkley, Plaintife, JUIGLANT Ye Barkley efendant. m2 This heard, and being heard before iiis Honor, jury at the hay Term, 1950, of ti ‘y ¢ the Superior (oy to the court that the defendant has Superiir sel ‘ved with process, and that the matter is properly before the court and the tury ving answered the ues ears of record in this case. — + desei, sso be cause coming on to i. Bobbitt, Judge ire sid ing and a iredell County, and it appearing ste 2 OL 4c wv as ap! ., bs Si eement herefore, on motion of Land, Yyowers & very, and Z. V. Turlinzte, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff 2 3, intiff, hereby granted an shealeee divorcee from the defendant hae L, 3x “of matrimony | are hereod etuvorncys J t ~~ T ) + } Hla 7 us Ss op he Ss iescribed in heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the ‘ y dissolved. real est: irSe bad assets to te, lefex ida a. irther ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to Ke i Upon motion oL of pla coqeeet or the re 1 Bobbitt the defendan Wm. H. PRESIDING The St abel ier JUDGE Uvon t he land ' aa Land, yvower ; Appeal SUP URI OR COURT, TER, 1950 rkley Jefendant. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor Judes oresiding at th 7 Suvi ee a term, 1950, Iredell County Superior Court and the plaintif that the defer ye ate | absolute divorce in this action, but it a. ~earing tort minor child, oS : . in her Answer for further maintenance and support # and the mine r ita) rkley, and ‘dams, Dearman and Jinberry, attorneys for the chi have fade a motion in this cause for further neyé enance af se CAG tern: said minor child and that said prayer and motion cannot be * We He Bobbitt ys for further asinténence, prov considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that tt prejudice to any of the’ prov.s.cn and support be, and the same is wi Superior Court, and tl parties, continued to the August Term, 1950, ath teh hanken a cause ts retained by the Court for the hearing referred to and for such orders as may be made in ing ootion This the 2nd day of June, 1950. Wm. H. Bobbitt udge Presiding dc Se aie aie aie steals aie afc ner an indefeasiv ann ou at of ner estate + costs of this \ROLINA UNTY Bell | Wee thers veathers and Carrol] we Ae 4 offitt, Louise Bell Loffitt and H. Helen Bell Rankin and Henry ll. Rankin, Lilla Bell winstead and Jacob iinstead, Eleanor Bell Alexander and John WW. husband, Plaintiffs, Vse Defendant. Tan srece se coming on to be heard at this term of and superior Court Judgg william He. Bobbitt, - arguinent of counse t the Court, upon the ‘creed Case", is Pine 0} inion’ and rules: That the feme plaintiffs are the owners in fee aracraph 3 and that the tendered deed wi le fee simple title to an undivided one-s: ject only to the richts, of the credit Bal to resort to said real estate ts of the said Ir Lilla “Tann Bell sub c A ~e e ann Casas Sum plai t is ordered lefendant the complaint, upon tote in words and is BSurther ordered Clerk. itifis, i ver from t! ribed in th said real es 3Jase™ and it taxed by the +) ant Ve 54 NS « ave andre of esta A a d it of irre action ne e e OV scr = v ale Juare ‘ment the defe nd: negiggs o* 348 en€ 9 of the foresoins jud in open vourt/giyes in ope ° GaXeSe' 550.0 sim ing very, at of Bond fixed day June, 1950. , Judge 3 action con: “sy with of controvers al] submission md these appeal entires, Si 11 County up facts th: hi sae me sYyperior : s } : on consideration and set forth in "The ~ al estate o the defencan interest in said , . , ’ delivery ficures it tne def Bobbitt residing throuch to the n Se Bobbitt resi 4 ling st atement i titute e THE CIRCUIT COURT 1 No. 477 VAL SOUNTY, FLORIDA IN CHANC ORY North Jarolina Iredell Jounty Janiels .dministrator of of +e He Dé miels, inrs Daniels, Re Ralph Com] ‘ton @ vompton eause coming on to be heard and being hear pefore the undersi erior Court of Iredell vounty, upon the duly verified comp. t the ecuities answe iled i ne above entitled action; and, the relief sought. It is appearing to the court and the court fin nd the defendants nave sett Tomlinson -.cLelland, % ‘ssue raised by tue trimonii, of and from t ‘imony heretofore exist with interest er cent per s moiden nane, ‘estored. mee ae further ordered and adjuus I ne judement hereby entere (1) aa al County, Florida, ; j ; ; , ‘ . Lien on the property described in the comptadny Al bie bove entit nd after tne Rasta cesses a th day of tn ae ra0F Vvour sve she riley ittorneys waymer A | aay rmer (‘ctorneys tor vne dele Leonard .. Thomas Re L niels ive Administ: "OL Be Re. ircuit Court. rator of ©, { ve Daniels Filed in the of Nort 10m i ston PR fice = } "1 awl ° on s a " a of the Clerk of “unerior Court in Iredell Sounty, th day of June, 1950. A, J.Wilson o Aart * < rn, our’ Deputy Slerk superior © L106 +> an ‘ Norta 1roLina Teshtall Caunt Ltredeli youn Uy ys +4 Sn and Lavy —13n Aaah ittain Lumber mane CAUSE 20urt n+ 44h . + ° sss - ~- we dninistratc v7 —. sve JATIL € sh a ee wv | oe iniels Linnie D. Von, ,innie SOP } 1s ‘ 1 : ; ; ‘,. 480 in the Superior Court ioe 4603 waAnm Nord T1gDELL COUI snarles Be ym ERIOR COURT r T TK CAROLIN s Try Vi Keiger, Plaintiff, VS. m Tayes m c L ay es and beings heard before the duly verified comp - Os nd sn } court findine as a fact tha l of the matters at is consent that \dministrator of te other plea interest from thed inun am fa@ the costs - . 7 . Y } a 4 the gud:ment hereby entered 1 laint in the above ent tled action 354.31), ad a er onith - — etier with —tuiperior Court ntil paid; have and recover of the defendant the s thirty-one , also known as ( > Defendant. " This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorab ar Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion b ne defendant by default final; the court that arineg to the court a were served on the detend¢ it further appearing to the court that no answer, «| + Vv has been filed by tune aac been cranted and that the time within and it further appearing to the Court from action consists of the nonp yment \f Three Hundred Fifty-four Jollars and me being for insurance coverase for the defendant's benefit, tog- interest at the rate of six per cent (6jo) per annum from Jyne 1,194, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plai sum of Three Hundred Fifty-four dollars cents with interest thereon from the lst day of June , 1946, and the costs C. G. Smith Glerk of the superior vourt North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County e the Vle 1 ..ortgase du e defe dant Mady ety on the as fdled to are indebted "ate } : nat they have 15th lune ne ly ~ . + mith he Ze ie a tierk of the Superior court before the Clerk of this Court and as com.enced on the 9th aay of haren, served o ll of the defendants with in uired and that they have failed t i: ae - answer: that the defendants are in } b 5 ty } Y : ;f idebted to the plaintiff in the sum of 3’ with 4 ) 949 : } ‘ith interest Vecember 28, 19475 7 unt il iid. at ae soo plaintiff recover of the defendants t# axed with t f Yr On ecenl ¢ ’ had } embe / +} - " r <oth, 1949 until paid and they are t¢ action, June loth, 1950, GC, tlt Smith Clerk of the Superior cot sic oie aie 3S 3 te ste Hea EM de ae aS appearing ty: ie gum ° , 4629 Je I. Lutz Ve voe Company, onroe ms: a Corpe; Estate of Je Le Adams; Admini stratrix of the i ‘state Of **. V. awl ey; and Pressly Davidson, doy Davidson and. "Joe Davidson, xecutors under | the will of Je Ae Davidson, dec. and all other stockholders in Iredell Lumber Co., whose -og are unknown to plaintiff, tredell Lumber Adams, - igmr of the liyS. sve ve nee st) anes | and addresses lo the Sheriff of Iredell County-Greetings: are commanded to summon lredell Lumber de Me AGAM irs a B awley, ite of ressly Javidson, oy on, a ~+ } m Le oUune!l Javiason, es and aagauresses 47 aheda if they be found within your vounty, Sourt for the County of Iredell, at unantay wu) Ci 4Va fter the day of the office of tue served herewitn. ylaint within tae the relief demand siven under my 1a eceived Februa erved luaréh leliverinz a copy of ti ithin ons and a copy of the plaint the following defendants: ey, aduinistrator 1 resly 1e W c om to Davidson, oxecutors Davidson, eased a, Vavidson,dec Lumber vompany, 2 Corperatien, we 0S officials or agents cia@.jnot ; ue serach and dili “ence be found 2 Iredell County and that after due ser: ich laaer Gene no stockholders in Iredell County, OI x any can be found in Iredell .onro or .n North Carolina other than e adans , Administrator of the “State of J. °... idams, [urSe Iie Se Brawley, and eeeratrax of the sstate of R. 3. snr and | 8si Javidson R Ja dson an \0¢ Davidson, etcthes ” water the’ Will of Ue A, Davidson, deceased. o OL —— as ~ \ ae bb wd ‘ VOoy a JaVLaS uperior + , weade Corp v4 Administratrixz On, sant UNTY. cutors “~ } } sreagels in - 50° eryse" he ox wD Adee filed action iis lst wley buonroe ..< <a Abe J ws es ons Ln Ve U Ue ial Vv ste Orris Sherirf 1redeIl 4% uS_ . ~ , . within d furt.l er a on w We = entitvseda service 19D. sdministr ator dams ,dece Fo Ol laren, Toun ity state ive Sa ed. ——_$$—— 11 that certain tract of land lyin; Le st intersection e Yonner vtreet ind rake Street Lin the Lity if, ‘sville, i : founty, North ‘osrolina, and being more part ULAPLy scribed s follows: erinning at the vouthwest intersection f Conner Street treet in. atesville, 1 redell Gol nt) ) orth aro] ine . thi nee with the Y pe treet vouth 16 west 14O Leet to take; thence North edra J \ : ; ‘ s f : : L foat Lron TAKE 5 thence North 6. ©; it: thence North foet t rat ' es t fron stakes thence outh feet iron stake on tine out . * Gonner etre jonner treet, Jouth 6 at 8 feet .” rvs { ie yvidson conve bye ' ecd in Deed Rook 159, at pare 141, ymuba { 14 we imson ‘ the defendant , +) ounty, North pbembe ‘onpany for a oneethird inter: poe ‘ jredel) j,amber ,On d d Book 5 ‘9 , 1G, jrede] i pount: that the real ; . aaa id/ ner for a number of y ‘5 and that ter | aye ule ‘xecutors under the Will of the ¢ iid lavidson, under “# power i ated Apt? . ‘ wi l, conveyed the above described rel roperty LO ve from brs. Janie Davidson, @9 von : \ . 0’ nahn : sr ded in the s egcrih! loth day of nay, 1 38, which jeed is reco! owing Book 135, nt pare HT imple title, to the fol \ ister of heads for Iredell County in Deed © Jounty of Iredell, ’ . 1. OC. Wall he abo’ serd roperty to ¢ Walker and 4 ife, juarjorie Se Wadker, convey the bove described | ' oP 2 i ayidson nd wife ani Davidson by deed dated the 7th day to e Yaviason, an wile, J 1e ’ P) (on Gay of Oetob ’ a a . 1.0; that the said ite F. Davidson died in 1945; and that his widow became the That the said gap in the record af fects plaintiff's title to the sole owner of the above described tract of property by right of survivorship. “7 and above described tract of land and that the said interest remainins on record in she conveyed the above described property by warrenty deed to the plaints; ’ i intiff it] conve) O the plaintify, the name of Iredell Lumber Vompany 15 @ cloud upon the plaintiff's title to he 3rd day of Uctober, 1946; which deed is referred to in paragraph ty aro Tee; caid property. plaintiff has been in the possession of said property since that +: JHERSFORE, plaintiff prays judgment that the cloud ev adverse record claim of the defendant corporation and defenda record in the office of the Clerk of the removed from their said title of record to said property am th: Ag Alin htt da , h a : f > a y a? Pe > } Mumber red the owner of fe simple of said property, fee irom the the defendant, Iredell existing corporation; t.at th : , c i 2 ; 20; Glat the ofendant corporation and the stockholders thereof, anc for the co st en ee ene a : IS Ant Lne + ants = a. : ! indicate tnat the said 4redeli be toxed by the Clerk. it is out of business throu: —— ---= = wood.iouse & ward 50r © nited tates District ses e Division, show no eee Le ER TE ounty Je I1 Lutz, the plaintiff Vs: That he has re i the forezoin wn knowleds: information and b hat as to those he believes yny event ta said corpors:: to before me, Se ae rz ane ~~. +ho ee 7 ; slaim or cloud on We ee ee eee this action as al] possi iefect in said title are - : . +1 . sa fancy. aim such stockholder 1eieh vy the deeds referred to inp informed that the record tithe ble title and the record predecessors in title; that the he present state of the record there 1s 4 scribed tract of land. ee ee : ; ad : e en if intailt and his predecessors in title, since 1914,pave be continuous peaceful »vosse r sion of said land, above described, under known an iefined boundaries, and have : hei ries, and have color of title to said land; and that they and ¢ entiad nredec 3S « 4 : s - ’ I ecessors in title have naid both city and county taxes on s aid property and that their possession and r disbu apparert ovmersiiip has never been contested ° Jaa NY or Mahe ec Sum re SUPERIOR COURT titled action n ions inmid action has been duly issue jell County for service upon the SUM. indor:s "Iredell Lumber ‘ter due search ilisence in North found nid defend Joni. to rea. fawn favor - -laintiff Voe poration; juonroe dans, ‘ inis tre tor of the ast te of NOTICE Aan Pi urSs ire De Brawley ls iegterat Mx of Un 7 of » vv. B wley; and res ri ge Havidson, ?and Joe oF ban xecutors under the “all of J. > 3 and all other Navi ison, 1eceé ised, n at de ; ‘ } cers in, trecs Lumber... ab gcany 1 ders. Bai iBSo: ht aay resses are onknot m to plaintiff. oF ’ Vv wedell Lumber Vompany, @ r 0 Ad Gs Defeniants. The defendants, lredell Lumber Compa stockholders in said Iredell Lumber vompany, to the pli f, and any and val& Tredell Lumber Vompany, 2M That vlaintiff has comienced in the superior an nection entitled £ from the ti the office of April, action, or plaintiff will complaint. oe 1 1 aes " J are 4.140 by Gay Od OVC lly 4} Ul w\TT Dm YUUILL sorpor Court of A a yourt the complaint filed relief demaz Sur er for ided “court ~ In the Superior Court cont nent - ie eee a stockholders a are deemed t aM residents are unknown; Iredell Lumber Vompany, a Corpor tion, who ° earch, be found in the State of North Carolina. notice be published once a week 3% jorth carolina, ‘e, orde ed that il ici . ublished in Iredell County, } tivine the title and purvose of ' pe e and purpose of this action and recuiring the defendants %° - the lersio +9 } } 1, ° undersimed Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell Gounty) April, 1950, and answer or jenur to the C. G, Smith ae CULérxk 6 Yup gH CAROLINA L COUNTY enone T 2 BD dads ) yivae 1. J, Lutz, Plaintiff, Ys . Ivedell Lumber Company, a sorporation; j,onroe ‘dans, dministretor of the “state Je be Adams; hrSe te Ys rawley, dministratrix of the Sstate of “. | Brawley; and avids Roy Javidson ixecutors J, ae Davidson, stock- Lumber Company s areun- of “pessly and Joe further appea verified complaint in continual and 54 s Pe , he } intifi ana nit predece-sors [A 4 Snes a . Pp ese me 7 os y 4 cele otis tid land under coior ° title openly, notorious+y, and session of all persons, for more than seven years preceding the commencement is action; that plaintiff and in title have paid both pity ante taxes cm said pooparty ai 14; that the plaintiff vredecessors in title have used the land, under color of title, openly, notoriously, and aversely to all persons for more than seven (7) years; that the land by reazsonof his adverse . slaintiff seck mice Le ; oa plaintiff secks to establish his title to sale possession of same and to iet title to said land; and it ap earing to the Vourt that the allegations in the complaint are ture, and that said land is described fol Lows: Son all that certain tract of land lying at the Southwest intersection of iiteiien eee and Drake Street in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, Norta rolina, and being more particularly described as follows: : Beginning at the Southwe st intersection of Conner Street ard Drake in Statesville Iredell County, North Carolina; thence with the western | feet ¢ Drake Street South 16 West ib feet to a stake; thence North 76 Wiest 2 Sect Oo an iron stake; thence North 62 West 60 feet ; thence N : bape ost ee So aniron 5s , : l n stake; thence South 62 Nast 60 feet to a stakey thence 20 feet to an iron stake on the South margin of Gonner Street; the Bast 253-5 feet to the begi 30 . : , “outh margin of Conner Street, South 62 mn 4 950 will not nreiudé iot prejudice tue defendant or in any way , . aA 4ancan ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the 1 PLainti? t it 16 j ai 2b ve cle Sc d ro erty l e n ne €é 0 U6 I ibe ) dV re ' : 7 J ason of th anlaty ci cae i a omplaint which this Court finds to be tr rue, on motion 0 the above minty sOUNU]y Yasar TT younty ’ ‘@ ils attorney have consented to the removal of tus vuperi e Cour + " E Lor court for trial at the Jyne Tern, 1950, Le this acti - vat ion to Cabarrus County Superior Cour adversely + for trie TT 33, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORD of Adams, Jearman and winberry, «ttorneys sonsent of Neol Re ve ‘,oodhouse, ..ttorney action ®&, and tie sak North carolina, for trial at the June T time during Vast 2 wy hand ar official JLT Noo fiby 12 earman < inberry sdams, wt 1a Ss for tne : aintilt e coming on the North Carolina, and the Court finding: That this is an action for an ‘round of two years separation. > “me That this action was commenced of I a ws , a 2 ~ Iredell County, North Sarolina, and are both within the Fifteenth Judicial aid term of Vourt as the Judge gor the plaintift, for the defendant, Term, 1S and the tr +} wa 1 Q ay absolute divorce brous and is now pending that Iredell vounty \4 iJ he y that the above ie is hereby removed to the superior Vourt of Caba fal to be said Court may order. - s° * oi wv s 1 o>mitn aoe om siiicaiuaiiaee ae erior vourt ol ht by in the Juperior Court and Cabarrus younty strict of North Carolina. Ts service of the United States f the undersirned j eerste ned ouperior Cp» -Ourt Ounty superior ourt, &>pointed di " I ed la Lambert ‘.allace, coraance with the oldiers Plaintiff, allace, ly harvey i.acK efendant. cause oe a4 Ves OLS aAhhi tt ODDLUV, Leinc ction ointed ‘epresent the defer forth that n investigation of the ie trial of this action, and the cranting an absolute divorce would not work on injustice or undue hardship on the defendant, the ebility of the defendant toc onduct his defense is not materially affe } : ‘ ‘ f a eted by reason of his military service; and the Court further finds that the action representing Cc ‘torney for the defendant was present at the trial of thi a this Gelendgnt,. er finds noc hildren born of the marriac r me nharriace union of the this ection end that to, 40/1 property ol +e added sDOT.INA NOMI’? ITP RTOR “ORTH CAROLINA SUPE DRL OR COURT trom the defen... o ) } a ‘ a 9278 OUNTY of the defendant have not beent TQEDSLL COL been done the defendant m t) ‘ , 4 fendant from the tria) «2 J Finance Corporation, ivorce. Plaintiit, JUDGIENT : pounty t : Det'iendant. an order ais cause coming on to be heara, and veing heara deiore the 3mith, Clerk or the ouperior Court or Ireaeil County; to tue Court irom tne statement t t rior 1 f \y Jai vorne actioOne a has elected to t«ure oe _ a2 nonesuit in its qacre ua thererore, ordered, aaj “ne above entitiea cause Aas Ooi . she ame af Phadasice agreement this action is aismissed at cost ol Plaintiil. acreement the truck 1 c - LW v . >] : ' ‘ ‘oe ‘ + ~~ urned over to aintii1 and Pilaintiil o recovers le ae rs further irom tne ueiendants, June 27th, 1950 Agreed to m3, A, Collier Attys ror pltii weoy —till Young Det'endant c*£eheneeeeneeaeRSe HH HEE EH x x SUP URTOR COURT pon motion North Carolin: In the Superior vourt Iredell] County Lewis \.illiams, Plaintiff Vs. Rruce MeLaurhlin ; JUDG ENT OF NON]DULT H. H. Howard Defendant | This couse coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the ouperior Court on this the llth ay of July, 1950, and it appearing to the court that the defendant, H. H. Howard has released his interest in the captioned property, and that the defendant, Bruce McLaughlin, has no interest in the property, and that plaintiff now wishes to take a voluntary non-suit \ gr . ‘ riginal hortyaye exhibited with release by Howard. It is ’ : ane 8, therefore, ordered and decreed that the action be non-suited the plaintiff taxed with the costs C. Ge Smith —— ua - Tierk Superior vourt Re se Collier Atty for Plff, Ne He ai abe ae MC MME BY Re RSAC IFC DLR 96 BYE YE No. 4775 North Ca rolina, In the Superior Court, tredell County May Term, 1950. Ruby Waugh Basista Vs. | ORDER FOR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD. John Basista { This cause wm ming, on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, Jilliam H. Bobbitt, Judge Presiding at the i.ay Tern, 1950, Superiar Court for Iredell vounty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court, and the Court finding, as a fact: 1. That one minor child, namely, Gerry Lynn Basista, was born to the marriage union between the plaintiff and the defendant, said child having been born on the 20th day of January, 19146. >. That the said minor child is now living with his mother, che plaintiff, and has lived with and been sup) orted by his mother, the plaintiff, since the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on the 5th day of march, 1947. 3. And it further appearing, to the Court, and th Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor child, and that the best interest of said child would be served by being in the custody of his mother. Ze Ly THEREFORE, ORDERISD, JUDGED AND DECRIED: L. That the plaintiff, be, and she is hereby granted full and complete custody and control of Gerry Lynn Basista, the aforesaid mihor child. This cause is retained for further orders. 36 It further appears to the ourt that the above entitled action was brought by the plaintiff for the custody of the aforesaid minor child; that a judgment jranting the plaintiff an absolute divorce from the defend nt was granted at the January Term, 1959, of thelredell County superior Court. This the 31st day of hay, 1950. wm. He Bobbitt _ udpe presiding IN Tis SUPERIOR courr VOLUNTARY Non=Suit i, Be McGraw This cauce coming on to be heard verore ©. Ge Smith, Clerk of the Superior ‘ourt of Iredell County, Ni. C,, and it appearing that the plaintiff > 9 ar c 5 5 ha at s A a 4° ™ v ., hn he rd and being heard before the Nonorabd desires to enter & voluntary non suit in the above entitled action: it is superior Court of +rede-1 Younty, and it appearing therefore, on motion of z. V. Turlington, attorney for the piaintill, rdere controversy set out in the pleadings have been ag ‘ed that the action be and the sane is! by non suited; that the fendant has agreed to release the 3 id by the plaintiffs. aeserived in the complaint riled herein, : This the 19 acreed to release the devendant frau ay chattel mortgage, which is referred to in sourht by this action to foreclose; and it controversy have been agreed upo rlincton Vlaintiffs adjudged, and decreed, that ti ered red, defendant the Buck Automobile, which is describe Tre , tree and discharged of any claims of tt ii a ca laalial sisal hte ene a : on h eased from any deficiencies he might be ,Y ttel mortgage referred to/the complaint Ce G, ~mith — ot Clerk of Superior court” & lredell vounty ' = ‘ sonsented to: ,oodhouse ™~ Ward > 77 7 ae a eee tes ATTO.ucY Lor the Plaintiff? He San CS Se eee s jillia: Dist BIND ade _-—-—_- - sud >» ma KR KD —es ee be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the ~ . i eine heard,and it appearing to the Court ;*S Have been compromised and lecreed ani adjucred that the fe one Hundred Do y iddjuized tha he PanAny ea pie ‘ that the defendant tale nothing yy ’ . ecw Yo Ue omita Ye 2M Clerk ouoerior vourt rs, with pre jusis IN THe SUPLRIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- AUGUST TaRh,1950 Monday, July 31st, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPZRIOR COURT [REDELL COUNTY. AUGUST Teri, 1950 Be it remembered that a ouperior Sourt begun and held in and for ‘ the County and State aforesaid, at the Courthouse in Statesville, Nh. %. on the 31st day of July, 1950, at 10:00 O'clock, A. Mi., when and where His ifonor, Allen li, Gwyn, Juage Presiding and Holding Courts for this the *ifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, Fall +erm, 1950, is present and presiding end Honorable “ohn +. MeLauchlin, Solicitor ana orosecuting attorney in and eenth Judicial istrict of North Carolina, is present and pros~ - in the name of the State. i. 0. Morrison, igh sheriff of Iredell present and opened Court by order of the vourt. i. 2. Morrison, High sheriff of Iredell Count, returns into open names of the following good and lawful men to serve 4&5 jurors for aucust erm, 1950 Iredell County superior Vourt, to-wit: PrP. Stevenson R. Brandon Holland Chas. A. 2-tevensor, Mullis Layes Clodfelter- ./ dohnson ? { o ’ An - + men were duly drawn ene sworn to period ending December 31, 1950 J. B. Reece Charles A. Baggerly &. Brandon Holland Lester ©, Hollar L. white Ss. R. Hart G. *, Mullis \. F, Peacock Paul E. London Albert II. Cooper E. ». Mayes H. Be. Wayhew ae Herman G. Scott M. Clary C. P. MeNeely, Jr. N. T. Houston Ralph B. #eimster J. Sam Deaton C. P. McNeely, Jr., was sworn 48 Foreman of the Grand Jury. H. &, White, was 8..orn 45 officer in charge of the Grand Jury. oe Paul Leonard, and E. M. Crawford were excused on Doctor's Certificates. Mrs. R, L. McKee, Mrs. A. “. Fanjoy, Chas. A. Stevenson, Js W. Little and - Baxter Abee were excused by the Vourt. irs, P, MeNeer Dillon and B. lM. Garrison were exeused by Statute. D. S. Clodfelter was excused by the Court as being sick. “. C, Myers was out of the County. ee eel IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- AUGUST TERM,1950 monday, July 31st, 1950 R. L. Bost and W.E. Knox, jurors called and failed. Capias issued The following were summonsed and sworn as tales jurors. Shoemaker R. A. Brawley uM. C, Smith Harry Gatton 13) wooten on the Harwell lhe a MieNeely M. G. Crump C. H. Goodin N, 5, Sharpe Zeno Greenwood A. H. MeAllister WwW. WJ. Hoover Baxter Davis L.a. Thompson im. Cooper Sam Laws B. S. Sherrill Claude Kipka Jade Vampbell R. F. Lackey BaSTsRDY Qn Continued under former order NON -SUPPORT Sontinued under former order n sted Libs la/ dL Vontinued under former order LTO] =sUPPORT , a. alias vapias wi ahaa aan os wO..-oUPPORT Alias Canias a niet seit NWO. YYOU LARCENY “ Alias Capias Joe Johnson No. 1084 NON-SUPPORT State NTINVE _ CONTINUED under former order Eddie Joines No. 116 State 4 LARCENY vs Continued und er James *, Harris sOrmne. order Yo. 1167 State vs vaddell Sawyer No. 1185 State vs ; Wliie ie James No. 1205 state vs Nathan Satterson No. 1222 state vs Billy Rankin No. 1271 State vs Ervin Shufford No.1290 state vs George Lee Yonnor No. 1303 state _ vs James ¥, Icenhour Ho.13 State vs le na webster Dee Woods Yo. 1103 State vs Guy “amsey io, 1323 State _ _ ¥S Lula ae Carpenter No. 1346 State vs Alvie hee Gant No, 1348 State a N@il Wike IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK- -AUGUST TERM,1950 Monday, July: 31st, 1950 POSSESSING LIQUOR Alias Capias BURGLARY Continued under former order BASTARDY Continued under former order ss cok ‘ ike ea POSSESSING LI WOR Alias Capias : — “i ~ seas ims ADmM Boa WJONu Ll ski WIN Vite Continued under former order ween TmtT ~v >A ASSAULT WilTH venJbi What Ul Continued under former order SPEEDING Alias Capias — aT t ( wm ) C T RC . Daas aed se Tg doa deta awiad dosetlyois Nol “ros “ith Leave FALSE PRETENSS Continued MURDER Continued DRIVE DRUNK The defendant called and failed. Judgment Fa and Capias. DRIVE DRUNK The defendant called and failed. Judement Nisi Sei Fa and Capias. Refana women: Enis MS aS State vs Srvin Feimster No. 1361 otate vs irvin Yeimster No. 1362 otate vs orvin Feimster No. 1363 otate vs Ervin leimster Noe 1304 state VS prvin *veimster NO. 13 vtate Vs Joan Henry ‘omlinson No.1?72 and 1373 tate vs James ppaere on No. 1396 & 1397 vtake Norman T. Hoover We20 WencY” IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BTRST WEEK <o= AUGUST, TERM, 1950 yingt ey, july Sree gee 4 ’O.GERY Alias Capies FORGERY Alia S [Vie DRUNKKs DRIVING VUKED. the defendant enters a plea of guilty in both cases. Judgicent of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the comion jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE MUlTs, to ve assigned tq work ynder the supervision o the State Hi go and -ublx Yorks Vommission, and pay the cost of the action. The prison sentence is suspended upon the following condit. That the defendant be of good behavior and violate none 04 laws of the state, and that he stop drinking intoxicating liu beverare; that he work hard and save his money; that he do nt operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways of the State a period of three years from this date; that he deposit a da in the sum of 3500.00 with the Clerk of this Lourt for hi 3* ance at each July Term of the Court during the period of sus said bond to be paid at the rate of » 30.00 every tw weeks, ™ the full sum is paid. At the end of the period of suspensio, the defendant nas lived up tothe terms and conditions af t®® pension the Clerk is authorized to refund the emount of the ts the defendant. The first payment on the bond to be mage o beginning August.9, 1950. / * ; etn Je} IVE DRUNKy RECKLESS DRIVING. The defendant enters a plea of guilty. opett The se two cases are consolidated for the purpose of jude The Judguent of the Court is that the defendant be cont comion jail of Iredell County for the term of TWELVE wONTHS 1ssi ged to work under the supervision of the State Highway Public \works Commission, a _ the plot poe sentence is suspended for a period of tine the following conditions: : That the defendant be of good behavior ard not violate “¥ the laws of the state, and particularly that he do not bo intoxicated either publicly or otherwise, and further that ote not drink any intoxtoatine beverage, beer, wine UOE oot @ ntoxicants, during the period of suspension; that he do ® ria a motor vehicle on the public highways of the state for bo 12 months from this date;that he apply himself regular ert mate, gainful occupeation; that he deposit with the? af this Court a cash-bond in the sum of $400.00 for his APP etot that out Term of this Court during the period of sué hat ti fend or lived up to the conditions of suspension; hr 4 ndant deposit said bond in weekly installments of 45.0 of # peta the full amount is paid, At the end of the pert soa if the defendant has been of good behavior and patunaae the terms of the suspension, then the oaeual . ed to the defendant. The money for the bo Tht y the defendant and not ot herwise rocureds court: S judgment is agreed to by the defendant in open No. 1399 State vs ; arthur Lee Jixon No. 1339 State vs Vavid i, Harkey W=2k, No. 1354 State vs in the Superior Court FIRST WEEK e-= AUGUST TERM,1950 Monday, July 31st, 1950 MURDER The Grand wre returns in open Court, in a body (eighteen resent ) a True Bill of Indictment charging the defendant Arthur Lee Dixon with the capital offense of Murder in words and figures as follows: "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: That Arthuw Lee Dixon late of the County of lredell, on the tth day of April A. D., 1950, with force and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, willfully, feloniously and of his malice afor thought did Kill and murder Corby Kelly contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1950 John R. teLaughlin Solicitor "No. 1399 STATE Vs. Arthur Lee Dixon INDIO Tish MURDER witness Frank Byers J. T. Turner jianual Tuck John Clark Jawes Meacha Dre Je Le } We Fe Meloy H. P. Lackey Those marked x sworn by the unuer- signed foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found morn “a rRL “ oe dts © Ce i. ficNeely, Foreman of the Grand Jury. DRIVE DRUNK The defendant tirough his attorney, enters a plea of guilty. The judgnent of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the comuon jail of Iredell County tor a period of ~1x MONTHS, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State High- way and Public dorks Comnission, and pay the cost of the action. The prison sentence is 5 uspended for a period of three years upon the following conditions: That the defendant be of good behavior and violate none of the laws of the state particularly that he do not become intoxicated, either pwlicly or otherwise, and in.fact that he do not drink any intoxicating beverage of any kind; that he work hard and save iis money; that he do not operate a motor vehicle on the public highways of the state for a period of TWO YSARS from this date; that he deposit with the Clerk of the Court a bond in the sum of .} 400.00 for his appearance at each July Term of this Court during the period of this suspen- sion to show that he has lived up to the terms of the suspension: the defendant to pay $50.00 of said bondat this term am the remainder in instal iments of 3 50.00 per month until the full sum is paid. At the end of the period of suspension, if the defendant has lived up to the terms of this judgnent, said bond shall be refunded. The provisions of this judgment shall not be binding upon the defendant and no process issuing fromthis court may put said judgment into effect so long as and at any time when the defendant is a member of the armed forces of the United States. ASSAULT \\I TH DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill Benj amin Jackson Threatte, Jr. No. 1383 state vs weed ynder Jack Alexa IN FIRST THE SUPERIOR COURT WEEK ~~~ AUGUST TERM ,1950 Monday, July 3lst, 1950 FORGE it] T) the common to be assigne Highway and Public Works Commission, Suspended for a ditions: That the defendant be of of the laws of the state; ligitimate, his wife and minor child or children hat he and 195) and suspension, ability; t Yow V 44h iain’ [rue 45 I i True atl A True Bil MURDER ie defendant enters a plea of Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be C guilty, : fan ; No, 1387 oe o a On. in dts ot ate jail of Iredell County for a ter nroy ee Ned 5 ned to work under the’ supervi stom of CheU YE ban vs — The priso - — = ~ n ~ j YEARS upon’ the fol fowins’,: Int riod df FIVE Noe 14,00 g0od behavior and not vio} State that he apply himself ( : - SP] i re gainful occupation; that he Support ara! macCordine to his nen appear at the July Term of this Court tots snow that he has lived up to the terns of thi’ ate ps ly to vs . Grady_ Harrison (alias) Harris No . 1307 State Bill vs ¢, C, Johnston,Jr. We 22 Bill No, 1362 tate vs ichael E, Troutman No, 1394 otate vs frank li. oore wwe yrand Jury retums in open Court, in a body (eightee oresent ) figures as IREDELL COUN THE JURURS FOR THE OTATE UPON , oteele, anuary, A.D., 1950 Floyd unlawfully, did kill ana the statute and dignity « 1 ‘} a True Bill ,+0¥d Steele with the as follows: MLnll UF NORTH ( of Indictment Charging the defendant, | Capital offense of murder in worls 2 SUPERIOR COURT August Term}950 THEIR OATH PRESENT: That late of the County of Iredell, on the 7th day ® with force and arms, at and in the salt willfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforeb uurder hargaret Reid Steele contrary to ee in Such case made and provided, and against We." of the State, John R. sicLaughlin, Soli "#1398 vtate NPT » VAUL LNA TY. vs Floyd Steele LNDICU TRENT MURDER ] oa “witness 750 at 9:30 O'clock, Van meter Reid Buck Brown Barrett x Dr. Paul m. Deaton G. Wilson veESPG°CHET eh SHEE" kia Be ungeresepndforenan, am! A TRUE BILL C. P. mcNeel oreman 0 e IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM , 1950 Monday, July 3lst, 1950 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill ATTEMPTED RAPE A True Bill DRIVE DRUNK The defendant enters a plea of not euilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as’ follows: G.°P. Clyde W. ‘Yohnston, GlenShoemaker, Alfred Hadley, R. i. Brawley, 0. A. Harwell, C. H. Goodin, tie C,. Smith, E, &, “cNeely and W. E. Hoover. Steverison, m wy awit dibUedsd “ 4b Nol Pros DEADLY WEAPON With Leave RECKLESS ( he defendant j Jud Capias. m Court at iiooresville RECKLBGS DRIVING Thai cord 1is case is remanded to hi ~~ ven ee WALVG Uitte Continued for the defendant. Ma LS iz Presiding Ww. C, Fisher, A, .Steele, , This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, August lst, a ses Soe . a “ Bd Sa ae are ATi Pet nets - Sea ca tea A aaa ae alata ore EA SEE ES PES se - Sess Ts “= Ree DPE SF TERE ES > me 5 2 > "Saag ss — eee - RES IN THE SUPERTOR COURT FIRST WEEK ~-~- AUGUST TERM,1950 Tuesday, August lst, 1940 Tais Honorable Court convenes according to ad journme nt On Tuesq vu € Sday U. C. Johnston,dr,. WUs ue »t been served, ise bk d State vs william lioore No, 1386 State vs wile Jane fioore ue~ No. 1378 State a ~~ Lewis Cogrin ee emi 138 10. 13 tate vs Johnny hoten No. 139 otute vs arthur Lee Jixon 74 3 vO s. Knox, Juror, It appears that the Juror is out of a plea of guilty, evidence Warrants plea of Nolo Contendre, JRIVE DRUNK The jury after being duly sworn and empanel a verdict of NOT GUILTY. ted returned the County a: t is ordered by the Court that Judgement of C1 Fa be striche The juror appeared in Court in Person and states ordered that the Judgnent Sei Fa be Stricken oy vertificate and Court excuses him until November Tern o: »: 7 , se Juan 4 > Thm +2 Gerendant through his attorney, ur. J. G. Lewis enter peve CL NOV ZUullty. ; nt sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of guilt; 44d (0 « y m mer rw »Ulsl éi Atl JLAULI AOUN ,¥pon reconendation of “Ol rros with Leave aI private Prosecuting this case is row ws a Upon recom: Nol Pros With of private prosecut ing this case is “hrough his attorney, mr. Hugh G. Mitchell Nolo Contendere, JEADLY we al ON ‘ith Leave i SiSDING The defendant enters j tend: rs a plea of not cuilty. TILT Jury sworn and empanelled returned a verdict of NoT GUILT. ISSALIT.® wee Ants ) ae hal UY iWLY The defendant, WHAPON ¢ through his attorney, bur. W. KR. Battley ent MURDER The Jolicj ann, ict o lst eestor announced that he would not ask for a verd decree momian 7. ; he iraer, but for a verdict of lianslaughter, as © a* 4ne defendant through his i‘ ters! ttorney, mr, R. A. Collier & WITHOUT LI 2g ’ mM wre man < TAT me VP outal® Alo w0L0n VoHICLE Ld Li Adv IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- AUGUST TERM,1950 Tuesday, August ist, 1950 GRAND JURY REPORT = AUGUST TSR:..1950 IXEDELL COUNTY SUPERTOR CouRt The Grand Jury. met and passed on all bills that were presented by the Solicitor and found true bills in all cases, Committees were appointed to inspect the following county properties: COUNTY JAIL we have inspected the jail and found 19 prisoners incluiing € white ~ males, 2 white women, 7 colored males and 2 colored women. The cells are clean and in good condition. ‘the kitchen is in clean Shape and good condition. TOON n AHULOUN UAbu esneclaminaemmentnacenaie ana etas The Iredell County Grand Jury, Couwnittee t Ralph V. Feimster, and 5. R,. Hart, visited iredel] and found every- thing in good condition, sanitary conditions, good. meals are rood, amd after talking to prisoners, and being told that they were treated sood and wall fed oa and comfortable kept. We find that there is (82) eighty two prisioners at Canip. de also find that fences have been constructed to keep the cattle and hors. There has been 530 locust post used, 22 rolls of barb wire used and 100 rods of woven wire used. ve found the camp has plenty of vegatables, Vantaloupes, cucumbers, nh, tomatoes, and beans, and a good crop of Irish potatoes. Truck have been planted so as to keep a fresh supply during season canning to take care of out of COUNTY HOms ‘ committee of five, E.B. Holiand as chairman, inspected the County colored e iome. There were fifty (50) inmates, 16 white females, 19 white males, fenales, 3 colored men, and 4 white prisoners. All buildings and equipment were found to be well kept. All conditions with respect to food, clothing, and livin, quarters were in excellent condition as regards sanitation. From this inspection, this committee belives this institution to be well kept and supervised. COURT HOUSE ; Office’ or Clerk of Court. Leak in back of office needs to be fixed. Register of Deeds office. Paint peeled off ceiling in first office. Typing room needs painting and a flourescent light, also a leak in the wall. The typest claims that the ordor from the Colored toilet is almost unbearable at times the floor in the basement heeds to be fixed, the walls need to be painted and it needs to be relighted. A leak in the back of last office should be fixed. White Mens toilet. The cover is off of part of the steam pipe. IN THE SUPERIOR COUR FIRST WEEK --- AUGUST TERM,1950 Tuesday, August lst, 1956 Pr, Me As Uffice Rubber covering should be put in the walk waysS, through the Entire ope Alte, water seaps in all over the basement. Light at head of st airs leading CO the base ment is out. None of the repairs recomiended by the Grand Jury of the “ay Term have been looked after. We recomend that these be taken care of, teSpectively Submitted, Ce is cNeely, Jr, CL. Py feNeely, vr., Foretan o tae Grand Jury, Adan appeared in court and the tnet the sci fa heretofore entered by ontinued until November Term ,Ourt directe stricken out, ’ 1950. This Honorable Court t as ; ond akes a recess until Wednesday morning, August 1950 at 9:30, This Honorable Court convenes morning, August 2nd, 1950. “NOs 1399 state vs 2c Arthur Lee Dixon “No. 1399 state vs Arthur Lee Jixon < BO, S3he iwWoAULT Itate vontinued by consent vs Lee \.ithers otate vs lary saunders IN THE SUPERIOR coURT FIRST WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM,1950 Wednesday, August énd, 1950 according to adjournment on Wednesday The Court directs the Clark. It appearing to the Court that the evidence disclosed under oath that the witness, John vlark, in violation of the law operated and maintained a gambling house or was ensaged in unlawful matters, it is ordered that he be neld to the Recorderts Court of this county for trial according to law, Sheriff to detain the witness, John MURDER fe Judgment of tne Court is that the defendant%confined at the State Prison at taleigh for a term of not less than FIFTEEN nor more than LIGHTEEN YSARS, It appears to the Court that the defendant ere wounds from pistol shots amd that he may need medical care and attention. It is respectfully requested that he be given such medical care and attention as his physical condition may reapnably warrant, nas received sey- POSSZSSING LIGCUOR Continued by consent a7 sr ree ry AN OLAU GHTER Judguent of the Court is that the defendant be gontined in, the common: jail of Iredell] ABueRSs 0 Be adsizne No. 1350 Continued by consent otate ' vs John Trice Sherrill] sd , ATT i} TzD atari NO. 13 l N . Shake’ Continued by consent _ ¥s ‘reston Caupbell QO. 1321 RAPE tate Continued by consent Flake pullis iO, 5 7 aotavers sand Q s ene The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. ve dury sworn and empanelled. ; ; Joe Kirk . at tne close of State's evidence defendant moves lor judg- je 909 Te ment of Non-suit. motion allowed. No. 1387 ASSAULT WITH UEADLY WEAPON otate vs sounty for a term of wiGHTSeN to work under’ the supervision of the State Highway and rublic Works Commission, and pay the cost of the action. The Prison sentence is suspended for a period of FIVE YSARS upon the following conditiohs: That the defendant be of good behavior and violate none of the laws of the state; that he work hard and save his money; that he pay into the office of the Clerk of the Court for the use and benefit of H. F. Long Hospital the sum of 250.00, and the sum of 200.00 for the use of the prosecu- ting witness, Robert letgs; said amounts to be paid in weekly installments of 55.U0 per week, the first installment to be paid the week beginning August 6th. - The Clerk is authorized to make disbursements on a monthly basis, one half to Long's Hospital and one-half to Robert Nevgs . PLEMITTING PERSON TO OPERATE HIS /OTOR VEHICLE WHILE ) INTOXICATED AND WITHOUT A LICENSE. The judgment of the Court is that the defendarit be con- finned in the common jail of Iredell ounee for a term of SIX MONTHS, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State fig hway and Public Works Commission, and pay the tion The prison sentence is suspended for a peEtod of Put ek YLARS upoh the following conditions: That the defendant be of good behavior and violate none of the laws of the state; that he do not drive a motor vehicle on the public highways of the state for a period of TWO YHARS; (Continued on page’ 174 i ' q : Me No, 1371 State vs Garris Calloway Waddell NO. LLOC ~tate vs Grady L. Harris saline it AD uredy L,. Harrison N ri SUP rf OR ry) ie FIRST WEEK --- AUGUST TERN 1950 Wednesday, August énd, 1950 POUITTING PERSON TO OPERATE HTS popon HItep TNTUSTCATED AND WITHOUT LICENSES “OTOR ViHILeR yn, (Continued from page 173) that he deposit with the Clerk Of the c sum of 5300.00 cash for his appearance si7t,8 bong in ti during the period of Suspension and show that nouly Ten up to the terms of Suspension, said bond top © nas |i rate of 510.00 per month until the full sun ;& paid at ty first payment to be made during the present 2 Paddy thy court, and monthly thereafter on or before thet Of ti of each month, Failure to pay any instal Iment LOth day Constitutes a breach of the condi tions, At th When due the period of Suspension, if the defendant h ‘eo ood behavior or otherwise lived up to the can Suspension, then said bond shall be refunded, . alTihd TED anal BE The defendant through his counsel, bir. W, R Batt) e: tenders a plea of guilty of an assault on a fenale “a plea is accepted by the State, a ., the defendart through his counsel, ir, W, &. Battley » finding of bill and pleads guilty to forcible trespass i this plea judguent of the Court is that the defendant te tined an the common jail of Iredell County for a period ¢ v4 1 UNTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision » tne ctate Highwe y and Public Works Com ission, 7 n the count of assault uvon a fenale, he being anh yerson over the age of 18 years, the judgment of the tor +S tuat the defendant be confined in the ‘conimon jail of 3 sounty for a period of TWELVE WONTHS to be assigned to ug under tue supervision of the state Highway and rials 1 vommiission. This latter sentence is sus} ended for a cer ‘~~ upon the following conditions: I e defendant be of g00d behavio Laws . bne State; that he engage in such legitinete Yecupation as he may be able to erson, chi Y J2 LLVs f ho +' 4 Ui a4 ? QO, and that hea ila ’ CHulid eeet 7 , ¢ eocanl> « ullty of an assault: vor efendant enters a dea of Nolo contendere to u nawrul possession of Licuor, ne Jucgaent of t} ; ‘ ty j ndart be pee ; ~2€ vourt is that tne defendart be on the Comion jail of Iredelj Jounty for a tern of 1G. aka tor ae ned to work under the supervision 0: = ine of tone fublic works Commission, and that “¢ @ntence a%7 veU0 and the cost of tne action. The a we eee and the | yment of the fine are suspended it ve } re nyt ; r v . - ae e yess Oe Ue PAVE YEARS upon the following conditions: e o tne the defendant be of sood behavior and violate ie ae co + aWS OL the State, particularly the prdittion oce ps ia apply himself regularly to legitimate, ad avsvPation; that he Support and maintain his wife and™ according to his reasonable ability; ite Hi Child or children he depos Lt wi th the Clerk of this Court a bond in eu of 200.00 for his appearance at each July Term ol we yourt during the period of suspension and show that a paved up to the terns of thé judgment; that said Of f ve paid into the office of the Clerk at the rate of ‘YD per Month until the full sum is paid, At the end of © benaed Of suspension, if the defendant has been of pon Sue vtor and has otherwise lived up to the terms od refang zon then the Clerk is authorized and direct : Said amount to the defendant, ond be eeene the event of breach of the conditions the > pails ce ue may be applied to the payment of the seat . br ‘cep up the payments of the bond shall constitut each of the conditions mentioned, ta” © defendant is permitted to pay the weekly ‘th y sea eS on a monthi efore day of each month? basis, to be paid on or b in THe SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK --- AUGUST TER. 1950 Wo. 1377 I state vs i Ralph Edward i arrell| , “an Jon he \S No. 1395 otate vs Floyd Steele y= 32 No. 1399 State vs Arthur Lee Dixon Wednesday, Aucust end, 1950 AIDING AND ABLTTING TRANSP &TING LIGUOR The defendant enters 4 plea of nolo contendere to unlawful possession, The judguent of the Cowt is that the defendant be con- fined in tne comuon Jail of Iredell vounty for a term of WiGalwiN WONTHS, to be asSigned to work under the Supervi- Sion of the state Highway and Public ‘orks vomuission, aid that he pay a fine of )200.00 amd the cost of the action. The prison sentence and the payment of the fine are Suspended for a period of FIV: YeanS upon the following conditions: : ‘ That the defendant be of 500d behavior and violate none of the laws of the State, particularly the prohibition laws; that ne apply hinself resularly to legitimate, cainful occupation; that he support and maintain his ‘rife and minor child or children according to nis reapn able. ability; that he deposit with the Clerk of this Court.a bond in the sun of 3600.00 for his appearance at each July Term of this Court during the period of Suspension and s..ow that he has lived up to the terus of this Judguent; that said bond shall be paid into the office of the Clerk at the rate of 315.00 per month until the full sum is paid. at the end of the period of suspension, if the defendant has been of good behavior and has otherwise lived up to the terms of the Suspension, then the Clerk is authorized and directed to refund said aiount to the defendant. In the event of breach of the conditions, the bond here- in recuired may be apnlied to the payment of the fine, failure to kep up the payments of tiie bond shall constitute a breach of the conditions mentioned, The defendant is permitted to ay the weekly install- nents on a monthly basis, to be paid on or before the LOth day of each month. MURDER The Solicitor anounced that he would not ask for verdict of First or Second Jecree urder, but for a verdic of Lanslaughter, 2S the evidence warrants, The defendant through his attorney, ur. Baxter Finch enters a plea of not cuilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: ii, as Brawley, ze He Goodin, E. i. welieely, a. li. wteele, i. G, Pump y Clyde Johnson, W. i. vooper, i. &. Hoover, Glenn vshoemker, George Tsumas, 0. A. uarwelf and ig Ge Smith, , Pending trial of this Case the Court takes a recess until thursday i.orning. © ’ Jad vu a aX Mne defendant enters lea of Jury sworn and empanelled. mM close of the otate 's evidence defendan C iion-suit,. i.otion allowed, MURDER It is ordered that the Court reporter make an original and one copy of the evidence in this case, the cost thereof to be paid by the Board of County Commissioners of Iredell County. The original of such transcript to be forwarded to the Commissioner of Paroles, copy » be retained in the court filed. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday iorning, August 3rd, 1950 at 9:30 O'Clock, ~ : i rd -CLicee Vw Ww JUDGE ee PS - sae nS Tye cence novation te ase ~iarieeg tee wipe agennneeaeieas ta nena sean nt nl aati tatadhgnterncene = Re SR SE BL RRTE Be aie tore: “prong 3 SUPERIOR CUURT | THE SUPERIOR COURT how CORE OO eee First time <-> AUGUST foe 1950 FIRST WEEK "higuie 3a gig Thursday, August 3rd, 1950 Thursday, August 3r .s This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday ine rus ; 950 ; FALSE PRETENSE MOPRSRE, AUgUSt Jd, 17%. No. 1275 Continued by consent State vs J. Fe. xhinehardt WURDE! ; ; 1381 LORGERY - The Jury returned a verdict of guilty of wanslaughter, NOS. 1388” Prayer for judgment cont inued to the November Term, Judgement of the Court is that the def endant be Confined at ; 1 9? 1950. jond fixed at 3500.U0 the state Prison at Raleigh for a term of not less than SIx Zea nor more than NINE YZARS, 1301 , 5 4 5?» SEZZLEMENT 1392 & oe 7 ; ia P41 si aoe eee 1393 tne defendant called and aled. Judement N1IS2 Sei Fa ang tate sanj aS. : ITA , es B. Baker Tang Veo deo * No e 3 JO vtate vs floyd steele a Rat nsec ee saepemeeneteeee woAULT WITH DEADLY WwBAP ON The defendant tenders a plea of guilty of an assault on; female, which plea the tate aceepts, ip. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be Confined in “9*€se common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIGHTEEN wor? to b reat He j scat #15) ea ened to work under the supervision of the State HSzn /orks Commission and that he pay the cost of tie Ss TT Daag II eae caiiiemmeamemntinieme nema vexeeiions appearing to the Court that the defendant and His wife x auicable ter.s; that he hes made promises to the Court to perform his duties and responsibilites to his wife an Childre: it is ordered that the sentence imposed be Suspended for a x of FIVE YesRS upon the following conditions: , That the defendant be of g00d behavior, demean himself prow all times with relation to his wife; that he violate none :! laws of the etate; that he apply himself re ‘ularly to lerit occupation; that he Support, maintain and educates: ing to his reasonable ability and that he report to ty Jepartment of this County at such reasonable times 2: ‘4 elfare Ufficer lay direct and show that he is living up to tu terus of the Suspension, Tne defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in ta cauon Jail of Iredell County for a term of TwO YZARS, with le of the sounty Comiissioners to use the defendant in and arowi the County institutions and farm, Upon his failure to be of good behavior and abide by the | reaonable ers of the Sheriff and other arcents of the County onuii ss j the defendant to be transmitted to the State 2% ’ ‘orks Commis si on, to be worked under its super utUSNY and R ss4IVING eT _ the defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendre to the charze© irceny,. ives é The defendant through his attorney, mr, W. R. Battley od bill of indictment and enters a plea of guilty to ee a fe pros “rte knowing the same to nave been stolen, the — “the judiiene “of the gure ’sSuRt, ef Tegeiving spolgn propert ys comiuon jail of Iredell Vounty for a period of TWELVE MONZA Ke} ‘SSigned to do labor under the supervision of the state High and Public Works Yomiission, ; rt is that 4 vn the count for Larcen the judgue& of the court is ie 15 defendant be imprisoned in the common’ jail of Iredell fore "950 at. 10:00 ons a period of TuLViz MONTHS, this sentenée is suspended , on 3 fauankS upon the fo lowing expressed conditions. def ent release from Service of the TweLVE WONTHS sentence, the oct *S to £0 to work and to continue at some legal and Cate of 4 tion and remain of 800d behavior, and pay into the ce pages Clerk of Superior Court for the use and benefit of fe to the Children the 5 2-00 per week ard that he report hat he Sheriff of Trede Ounty after his release and show tha employed witi, ays after said release. for The Court ins the right to increase the amount “Upport upon proper notice to the defendant. i SURGLARY NOo 1313 & 1313, Nol Pros With Leave State vs Floyd Steele This Honorable Court takes a recess untkl Monday Morning, August 7th, Pa] Tt OL FIVE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM,1950 monday, August 7th, 1950 wAMm: WAND T N THR SUPit { 7, NORTH CAROLINa, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1950. IREDE..L COUNTY. This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Nonday ; hornir r11¢ T+) O50 : 1°-90001 } nth | v A A., - ee ' Aucust 7th, 1950 at 10:000 clock, with Honorable Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding aj a Qo Holding Courts of this the /iit enth Judicial Vistrict Fall Term, 1950, present i and iding. di. De worrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open ‘ourt the names of the followings sood and lawful men to serve as jurors for this + ugust Term, Tredell County Superior Court, to-wit: white Floyd J. Shumate Andrew Il. Joggs Ee Deitz the Nagle ite Halyburton hie Loftin Shaver D. We Goodin Fred Nesbitt Hal C. Ustwalt 3. Snow were out of tne County ley *reeze and Racnel sorrison were excused on x + | we 1 ~+ on } 2 » } } i ce constitute what shall hereinafter be terwed the Divorce Brotherton, L. Gordon Hayes, J. D. vorchrane, Ure, MWS. hite, J. u. siller, Frank Hillard, H. m. Hill, mrs. Bessie fred Nesbit and Uoyd D. whunate The followings consti cli — , “i : following constitute what shall hereinafter be termed the Divorce " to-wit: ndrew lH. Borrs ' , . : andrew i. Boges, E. b. Jeitz, P. A. Hagle, J. ie Halyburton, Me Loftin ia v ; 14 itn ’ i ’ « Goodin, Hal C. Ustwalt, . R. Battley, C. B. Jinberry, J+ % luren Jurney Buford Javidson, jaintif?, UI VORVE Vs. _ The Jiorce Jury ffl"being being duly sworn and é answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Y o Annie Bell Javidson, Veiendant, WwUst TH 0 AAR LINA LnkeDeLL SOUNTY,. = oearsey — August Term, 1950. _~~ford Davidson Plaintift, Vs. Annie Bell Davidon, Jefendant, 1. Did the plaintirr Annie Bell Davidson, intermarry as alleged Answer: Yes, c Buford David ? : avidson t in the complaint?’ mm the OO nent Ye THe oUreaton COU: SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST T2ku, 1950 yionday, August 7th, 1950 2. Have the plaintiff, Buford Davidson, and the defendant, annie Bell Davidson, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years imuediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff, Buford Vavidson, been a bona fide resident of the state of North Carolina for six months imediately preceding the comsencenent of this acti on? ANSWER Yes. yoaTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. guford Vavidson, | laintiff, Annie Bell Javidson, I Vse I I 1 jefendant. This cause coming on to be heard, ard by ilis iionor, Alle: ize Yresiding, and 2 jury, at the august Term, 1950, superior Court for Iredell County, iiort: Carolina, and the following issues 4 vine been submitted to, and answered by the jury, to-wit: a 1, Did the plaintiff, Buford Jayidson, and the defendant, annie Javidson, intermarry as alleged in tne complaint: WS\WER Yes. and the defendant, annie wo consecutive years Have the plaintiff, Juford Javidson, Javidson, Jived separate and apart from each other for tw wediately prior to the comieceuent of this action: 3. Has the plaintiff, Buford Javidson, been bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding tne commencement f this action? ANS\ bit Yes. vi ’ . } as inn & n4 ‘ 4 ay 2 teeneand at 4 The Court finds that the swaions in this action was issued on 1.ay 4, 19,8, aid that the sumuons was july served on tne defendant, Annie Bell Javidson, on way 4, 1948, by W. H. Shuford, Deputy sheriff of Iredell County, North Sarolina, 7 ‘ ° . i af } fey . delivering a copy of the summons, and a copy of the complaint to the defendant. The Court further finds that tne defendant filed an answer in this action on June 17, 1948, with Hugh G. pitehell, Statesville, North Carolina, as ’©r «attorney. The Court further finds from tne affidavit of the plaintiff, that ann 4 r - ‘ : te 8 ws i } 2 » 4 2 his annie Bell Davidson, the defendant, was not, at the time of the institution of this action, is not now, nor has she been since the institution of this action, in the wilitary service of the United States of America. \ECREDD, That the I IT IS, THEREFORE JONSID ERED URDERED ADJUDGSI, AND DECRG bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, aintiff, “uford Davidson, is granted an and they are, di dissolved, and that the 1 *bsolute divorce from the defendant, sae Bell Davidson. Let the cost of this ction be paid by the plaintiff. 1950 i100 8.0 This the 7th day of August, e Aen residing Beale Me Ae a 3IE3,< sere HK : + she ate sic sleste ae Beate Bie ale Ye a4e 3c Be e348 shea Be Be RAE ARICA FE EH He He BE 2k BRIE NE AE AE Pe ae aye 3c aye Be 3 paw IN THE SUPERIOR COURT V4 180 SECUND WEEK === AUGUST TRI. 1950 | Monday, August 7th, 1950 No. 4857 No. 4869 Ud VWURGR James N. Fulp Ve tne Divorce Jury //2", oeing duly swom and en Virginia R. Wilkinson DIVU RCE The Jborce Jury Fl", being duly sworn am em anelled answers the issues Submitted to it as Pollows: answers the issues submitted to it as follows. Danelle Vs. PN ee James H, wilkinson so Pen Edith C. Fulp sai 4 , {TH 4 kL ak IN 1m OU! ar LOR SUURT ula? : ‘ i ; SOUNTY OF IREDELL WORTH CAROLINA, “n the -uperior Court, aN nT ry oe 7 ay nf IREDELL COUNTY. august Term, 1950, di James N. Fulp | V i a2z2ves we 2828 | —_ Sdith C. Fulp + .. ere plaintiff and the said defendant lawfully lilarried ag m _— — < oO ged ] Vid the plaintiff and defend-tit marry each other and are t ey ~e in the complaint? : eh Tala = — / : now husband and wife, as allered in the complaint? answer; Yes, nswer: Yes, -¢ aS the plaintiff been a resident of the St ate of North Caroling ‘» ; “ae cer sae _ 14 j 7 a Jid the plaintiff and defendant senar: te, and have they lived eriod of six (6) months next preceding the filing of this complaint? . . ; » ; : : mswer Les P separate i@ apart Trom each other for more taan two years rior to the institutio: of this action, as allered in the complaint: Ww 36 _Jid the defendant comnit adultry as alleged in the Complaint ? tai 3 “as the plaintiff been onifide res nt of the state of Nart TADS OF NORTH C wtULIN 4 IN ? 1) IO RT MeL CL LOLI verolina for mae than six months before Cole comuencenent t ction, ( Lreini « wilkinson, i + } saintiti, in tne compleint VOe t Bea nT x m® UIVORCE answer: Les. I ee . i es . 4 LY On, a se ef t. | mauver Naving been broucht on *or nearing before the Judge Presiii 2m 4 WUT NVILNATE Goa d 4 4 sie al AY Vill ury at the As a eaen eee a ‘ nec ' oe OS “SENSE 4950 Term of the vuye rior Court for Iredell sounty, Narth vc: ee ee es . + : s . . } . CQ lv DPpearinrs to +r ‘A i Ss nid . . a ihe vames fj ‘uly peer ang to the Court th ‘6 personal service of Sumions has been had on the Co or I t and said defendeans al ibe Maik ‘ : — VS. ae na m ss Gesendant rack, 414€0 no answer to the Com: laint on the plaint.. ‘ S*Z@eeseaegaasz iS Yequired by law and ¢ pig ‘ . with c, Fulp ees SY AM and the followine 4SsueS having been suimuitted to the vury ai o | Jd é ij i is Sues 417; Vin heen ane, | afte . ° ° fen answered in the ailirumative by the said Jury: mer : alia Mi io Wiese ole Anis cause wmming on to be heard and beine heard ttiis Term of the a ae §6©were plaintiff ind said af , ; eka al leced ints Dlaint + oo a Sena Gerendant lawfully married as aLieged in mand . - 4 ; — to , So 400; answer fes, y superior Court of Iredell vounty, North varolina, before !lis Honor, Allen i. swyn, “7. . eas the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina +*' i, . 4 tionths next preceding tne fj ling of this Complaint? Answer: {é° vudge !residin *» and a jury, and the jury havin nswered the is Je Jig the defendant C ont adultry as alleced in the Complaint ? . ae e to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and acainst the defend: Sues submitted nt, aS set out CUOMGEM Gy ON motion of Bernard 4. Cruse, counsel for the plainth in the record: sourt that the bonds of ante. [T IS ORDER JUDGED ) DECRERN en. a te hereby gratt a . er y th ' my AY UECREED that the laintiff be, and she is hereby gré it is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the _- neal t a0solute divorce fram +) feiaia he ; , matrimor) Ma trim , . : —er amen WU. Buln. ant + lefenda: Orce from the defendant herein, and the bonds of matr “‘rimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, James N, ruip, and the defendant, 1eretofore existine | fi ; / Miaka a. bi lil ey iff 4a erented sting between the parties are hereby dissolved, ith ¢C, Fulp, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is rrante This ti e Tr} avy at ai a = In ahe - P i © 7th day of Ay ust, 1950, @080lute divorce from the defendant. Allen H. Gwyn Allen H. Qwyn He Gy Judge Presiding dudge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TuRMN,1950 Monday, August 7th, 1950 JT VORCE m Me iL wt : * The Divorce Jury j/1", being duly sworn and answere the issues submitted to it as followa: In the Superior Court, August Term, 1950. other, and are they ndant commit adultery, as ged in the complaint bonifide resident of the } . 2 + ~~ np y - . before the commencement olf tnais on to be heard and being heard ‘ounty j h Caan : os : = ; ' a ounty, North Carolina, before iiis honor, Allen H. -¥y% nd the jury having answered the issues submitted the pleintiff and arainst the defendant, as set out is herefo : as , therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the vourt that the bonds « itrimony heretofor sti y neretolore existins between the plaintiff, Charl se ; Q petween the plaintiff, Charles s. Cashion, and ti defendant ra | . ni » *rances Lowe Vashion, be and the » and the same are hereby dissolved, Alen He aging Judge Pres ing plaintiff is rrar ahe : ranted an absolute divorce from the defendant. (vee next page for custody of minor hildren) Allen He Gwyn d IN THE SUPURIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERm, 1950 monday, August 7th, 1950 vorth Carolina, In the Superior Court. tredel1 County. ucust Term, 1950. sharles 4-6 Cashion ” ORDER FUR CUS DY UF MINOR CHTLUREL ~e@ Frances Lowe Cashion Mis cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, inlis ec Judge }residing at the Aucust Term, 1950, Superior Court for Iredell younty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Sourt, and the Court finding as a fact; 1. That two minor children, nauely, Sharles Jdwin Cashion, Jdr., are © years, and Linda Carol Bashion, ase 3 years, were born to the marriage union petween the plaintiff and defendant. That the said minor children ere now living with their father, the plaintifi, and has lived with and been supported by their father, tne plaintiff, since the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on the < th day of October, 1949. 3 and it further appearing to the Court, and the vourt finding a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have tne custody and od ~ t the best interest ol said children snntrol of the said minor children, and tha would be served by being in the custody of their fathe IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, 1 That the plaintiff, be, and he is hereby granted fu end control of Charles Edwin Cashion, Jp., and Linda Carol vas minor children. This causeis r:tained for further orders. 3. It further appears to the Court that the above entitled action brougnt by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from tne defendant on the ground ¢ adultery, and for the custody of the aforesaid minor children, and that a judg- went granting the plaintiff an abgolute divorce from the defendant was rranted at the /ucust Term, 1950, of the Iredell County Superior Courte This the 7 day of August, 1950. Allen li. Gwyn Juadre :residing. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM 1950 tonday, August 7th, 1950’ anda Benfie Coulter re ro x/ The Divorce Jury #1” being answers tie issues submitted to VSe6 duly sworn ; an ‘ it as folj ; Smpanel 1 Ows; uarvey sugene Coulter IN THE SUPERIOR co August Tern, 1950, .ROLINA, SOUNTY ++ @ UR?, Harvey Eure Benfield Coulter vT.. ys ye ‘vey suvene Voulter Iredell County, North Carolina, 1. Jid the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they ng aa aw finding complaint? years; Jani and defendant separate, and have they lived ser: were born t ¢ ~ two years prior to the institution of this ne plaintl tne since the 1intiff been bon ifide resident of the tate of Nort 4 a) Ae ntns before the commencement of this action, as aller oupe rior vourt. Tern » 1950. coming on to be heard and eing heard at this Term of the ior Court /Ounty, North sarolina, before His Honor, Allen H. Gwyr, Presiding ; : . ' havine issues submitted to » and a jury, and the oury answered the ourt ji ro the plaint4 , t in rool the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: [t P and idjudged by the Court that the bonds @ iS, therefore, ordered, atrimony heretof re existing } : bie r we existing between the plaintiff, Amanda Benfield Coulter, ad nt Harvey ure) ’ : } : 7 amene voulter, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and ti is franted : abs j . F t nm absolute Givorce from the defendant. Allen Judge Presiding mim Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding, at the Aucust Term, 1990, Superior tar) pyr IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERY 1950 Monday, August 7th ,1950’ ' TN pry Sy Ty y IT) F INA, +N dha OUPMRIOR COURT, 2 dui, nity. AUGUST 1950, Amanda Benfield Coulter Wo yy oT) YI mm, t r _ } r Mia, > UitU bit fit CUSTODY it bal WOR Vilids JRGN VS. ne Coulter This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His lionor, o Court for and it appearinre to the sourt, and the Court fact: That three minor children, nauely, Janiel suzene sOulter, and tichael jicNeal c ce Jess Coulter, age 6 years; -oulter, o the marriage union between the intiff and defendant, =) Y 4 That the said minor children livin-e 2? Ui 4a nd has lived with been . ah-« Alanine i ant n plaintiff “AWcad ioned tue it further earing to nd use is further defenda: livorce from the bsolute custody he aforesaid for the aintiff »lute divorce from the defe sour t 7 near JULY superior iwyn a a illen Juuse 446 rresiding IN THe oe ra ig SECOND WEEK = AUGUS ERM.1950 “jon ay, Tee Fh Teese >. naw a4 be VORAUL The Divorce Jury ,l", being duly and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows; coming TRI Omir IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, August Term, 1950, nd are they now husva; separate from gs -] mot a es nifide resident oi tne institution of this the Superior court, - fy) <<a t Term 1050 LUTUSUL 1¢ ty toy . on be heard and being heard at this of tne vefore wy") mo " submitted aving answered ‘sinst the defend as set out i ‘ed by the Court that tne bonds Os laintiff, Ferne 3. Teaster, and tne ; - nid and me are hereby declared null and void an absolute divorce from the defendant. Allen He Gwyn Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-= AUGUST Tux i,1950 Monday, August 7th, 1950." Ho. 4O91 Janie Harris, JIVORCE My : ' ° 7 Vs The Jivorce Jury ;l1", being duly sworn and empanelled Se answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Sherrill Harris, <a moans CAROLINA — igs att macnn Te iI Has the plaintiff been a resident six (60) wonths prior to the coltuence vasa aint: ant married as alleged in tre Se a ——— Have the plaintiff rs next preceding Yes ee et + on to be neard and bein ie arc it the aucust ier of Iredell su fore His Honor, lon. Allen h. Judge sresiaing and a Jury and the Jury having answered the issues submitter them in favor the plaintiff and against the defendant as set forth in the recora, It is, therefore, ordered adjudged and decreed by the court that tne mds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Janie harris, nd the lefendant, Sherrill Harris be and they are nere jlissolved, and the saia Janie darris is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Sherrill harris. = : ete af this 1 tine as taxed | he The plaintiff will pay the costs o4 this proceeding as taxed by th lerk of this Court. Allen H. Gwyn Judge .resi — A a ing. IN THE SUPSRIOR COURT SaCOND WEEK ~=- AUGUST TURM,1950 Monday, August 7th, 1956 JTVORC (ine Divorce Jury ,/l", bein; duly gs 2 . il ? & Y swom a eek answers the issues submitted to it as Follong, eupanells LPowni ‘ yy Tt 4 AnOLIN 1 Acasa ‘ A aks 4 MAUVE IN THE SUPER] OR COURT in .«T t " AUGUST Puiu., 1950, . J a > nin” + ‘ & bape Mildred Lambert Gettys te from the plaintiff and have trey liv: ¢ 24 — allered in the somplaint ely, years or more North Carolina :s +n the Superior Court August Term, 1950 ‘d and being heard at the August Ter, uperior Co rt f ’ vy heft tre 1 ’ lude I urt of vounty, before His Honor, .llen H. Gwyn, Judge rresidin an Inver : + | ' . . i+ : “Gy and a Jury, and the vury Having answered all the issues submitted to in the fay f the nleintee/r ar ae .; . : savor of the plaintiff and inst the defendant, as fully appears in the ind it appearing to the Court that there was born of the marriage of the uintiff an “oe 2 sh antil f nd toe defen lant b= child, Leslie Lavada ettys, and thet the plainti: care and custody of said child; and it further appearing to the /Ourt and the ¢ % finde one « ' ‘ perso 2 the Court finds as a tact that the plointiff is a fit and suitable pe G nave the custody ; Te a a Si . hat ” tody and control of the minor Child, Leslie Lavada settys, and t best interest of said mi: _— ca sie s est of said minor would serve oy being in the custody of her mother, * beings found be eo £28 vac . ene found to be a fit person Lor the custody of said uinor,. i+ is nere * in 3 . c 7 » therefore, ordered, ad juiced and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofor xist4 ae wv “erevotore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the § are hereby dissolyeq_ . ic ; : fre ’ “SO.ved, and the plaintiff is hereby cranted an absolute divorce the defendar is furt : i e dant. dit is further ordered, adjwiged and decreed that the plaintiff, bildred Lambert Gettys, cust’! } Y) a} Se } be and she is hereby awarded full and complete care, ‘ } } ana control of the minor Child, Leslie Lavada Gettys < we This Cause, i in o ; h 41n so far as it relates to the cus tody of the minor ¢ retained for further orders, ing - Allen He Judge Press BEDE HS SK 9/6 He BK SK OR 3c Be Jk HK DDE IK BCDC 3K 2K 2S aK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERA, 1950 Monday, August 7th, 1950, No. 4693 Lots Lippard Johnson DIVORCE The Divorce Jury /1" Vs. answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Willie Glenn Johnson NORTH CAROLINA IN tHe TREJELL COUNTY. U GUST Lois Lippard Johnson Vs. Willie Glenn Johnson 1. Did the plaintiff é as allered in the Jomplaint ? Answer. Yes, Vid the defendant plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of alleced in the vonplaint ‘ Answer. Yes, 3 Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state a@f North Carolina for more than six months next precedin~ the filing of this Complaint. answer. Yes, Johnson "illie Glenn Johnson This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the Jugust Tern, Y Superior Court of Iredell vounty before His Honor, ,llen i. jwyn, Uudge ‘residing and a jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and arainst the defendant, as fully appears in the record; it is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of latrimony leretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, am the sane are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby ‘ranted an absolute divorce ‘rom the defendant. c This the 7th day of August, 1950. Allen H, Gwyn Judve Presiding being duly sworn and empanelled rot tepipeg ee APPEL DERE it an carte tee Te 5 Nati See oy the Clerk of this court IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK #== AUGUST TERM 1950 Monday, August 7th, 1950, De VO iC iy Vs. The Divorce Jury /1", being duly sworn and answers the issues submitted to it as follows. meted . . Louise D. hkoore smo. Sea Morris MDP? ’ tOITM WutLnh GALULLNA IN Lau ouPonrTOR GUOURT r 7 IXEDELL COUNTY UGUST T tun, 1950, N. oore Ue Lioore 1. were the plaintiff and defendant married as allered in the com).: intiff and defendant separate fram each other am have apart for more than two years immediately precedine the filis action as alleged in the complaint? a iintiff been a resident of the State of Nort! recedins the filing of the complaint in this actix s.oore n to ‘teard at this term of the 4redell superior >Ourt “ae toa3 es — — or ‘te “Wyn, ducge residing am a Jury and being heara ins tj + fay eT ee ; ; ; & baat the Jury 9 aaisweread the issues as set out in the record: *& 2s therefore ordered and adjudced that the bonds of matrimony heretr Lore existinr be “lads ' fa — . ; ‘ 4 een) - 7 Laintiff ind cetendant, be and the same are hereby diss )] : ' aA . 1 i t ] t div * LI om tne . the 1 tantili ’ ate 1.00re a$ nereoy trantec in OSO. u e 0 ce ,OUL SE Je | oore, it is fy ride awl oa : ro aa axes surtuer ordered and adjudged that the cost of this action bet aS provided by the Statutes of North Carolina. Judge rresiding _., LN THE SUPERIOR COURT OECOND WEEK -== AUGUST TERM, 1950 fionday, August 7th, 1950 Noe 4899 Gladys Ceola Lazenby ivorce Jury /l", being duly sworn and eripanelled te issues submitted to it as follows: In the Superior vourt, wugust Term, 1950 Tneordes Lazenby l. were the plainti é lefendant married, Complaint? eo answer. Yes dave the plaintiff and defendant lived se; each other .or two years next preceding the comuencenent of th inswer. Yes, Has the defendait been resident of ljredell County for ediately preceding the commenceuent of this action? aehae + NOonvaAS ete Yes. ‘ > Wee + wnnrews n J , old- This cause coming on to be heard before the undersisned Judre hold ing the recular Aucust verm, 1950, of Iredell Jounty vuperior vourt, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plainti and against the defendant, as appears in the record; : ‘ ‘ee - ° _— 4 the b ie it is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that ease : : 7 ‘ ree « } jefend ar , and “atrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, a | is sii Ais di iii absolute divorce ire hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute v ‘rom the defendant, iia wl aie costs bhis action. it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this actio d LJ. en H ~ Gwyn Judge ‘residing. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEE --- AUGUST TiRm, 1950. pionday, August 7th, 1950, IN TH SUPERIOR COURT Misty f° 12 ATT rar AT The dade BueGiN.wING JULy 31, Jos 947)\, al L, incorporated, VSe ‘ommittee on Jtandartie fecal ae a c ~% ) ed )\ Article D9 the General uotatu : ag : ea ea tas parolina, e heard and being heard before the undersizte: 1 for judsment dismissing action filed by the defendars O, 1950, and it appearing to the Court tiat pursuant to t: ‘ourt, dated January , 1950, tne defendants made an inspection of the purpose of jetermining whether the plaintiz! then complying with the segregation provisa r the defendants, the following such inspection tie Board of Nurse Jxaminers s Hospital wchool of Nursing nd it further appearing to the n Standamtization and the the membership of which is composed of tt y adopted the fillowing resolution on June « st yroaaco)] > he thea — ‘ ‘ ° oe . "at 2 it resolved by the Joint Vomumittee on Standardization and the hort: QO + Nie . csamd + a 2 : : . ® . Thee i hurse auiners, in joint meeting duly held on June <, 1950, School of liursing, Statesville, North Carolina, be and it is hereby certified, in .ccordance with the Urders of the Superior Court of Iredell County, “ n Accredited School of Nursing for the year (1949-1950) ending June 30, 1950, = the year (1950-1951) ending June 30, 1951; and that Davis Hospital School ¢ lursts and tl } ri } ’ : the Superior Cowt of +redell County be advised accordingly. AND DSCRERD that » ¥ , ) m4 VOMNOT ’ . | ; ee wey ee JUNOL Jantiy) , Uist Jat is y ADJUDGED dants have fullv sia A hie 8 4) : tamus 2 ve fully complied with the orders of the Court, both as the manda the est “sant wey » = } 2 : ; , . . . oi deres; r raining order, and otherwise, and it is, thereiore, further cons? ordered AG U 1"ec ¢ | YpA a Rs . * ‘ ° ° erk of » adjudged and decreed that tais action is hereby dismissed, and the cl ant Se this Court is ordered ee ; “a : : ordered to tax the costs of this action against the defend Juage Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---August Term, l Monday, August’ 7th, 1950° ai No. 4912 yoRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. gallie Huff Freeman, Administratrix | cTA DBN of Robert Freeman, deceased, Plaintiff, Vs. Southern Railway Company, Defendant. l i JUDGMENT | I This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honor- able Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding at the August, 1950 Term of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is the duly appointed, qualified and acting ,dministratrix CTA DBN of the estate of Robert Freeman, deceased, who died on September 19, 1949, as a result of injuries received while employed in Interstate Commerce as an employee of the Defendant, and, It further appearing that the said Sallie Huff Freeman, age 63, and the deceased, Robert Freeman, age 57, were lawfully married, and were living together »s husband and wife at the time of Robert Freeman's death, which relationship had existed since their marriage, and that the said Robert Freeman left no children or the issue of such surviving him, or any dependents except the said Sallie Huff Freeman, who was totally dependent upon her said husband, Robert Freeman; and, It further appearing that any recovery by Plaintiff in this cause shall be for the sole benefit of Sallie Huff Freeman, individually, as this action was instituted under, and is governed by 35 Federal Statutes 65, amended by 53 Federal Statutes 1404 (45 U. Se. Ce. Ae, section 51), known as the Federal Employees Lia- bility act; and, It further appearing that the parties hereto have settled all matters and things in controversy between them, whereby the plaintiff shall have and recover of the Defendant the sum of TEN THOUSAND ($10,000.00) DOLLARS. IT IS NOW THEREFORE, ON MOTION, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff have and recover of the Defendant the sum of TEN THOUSAND ($10,000.00) DOLLARS, to be paid to the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, from which sum he shall first pay Sallie Huff Freeman, individually and as sole dependent and surviving widéw of Robert Freeman, deceased, the sum of EIGHT. THOUSAND (38,000.00) DOLLARS; and secondly that said Clerk of Superior Court, from the tforesaid sum of TEN THOUSAND ($10,000.00) DOLLARS, shall pay to J+ Ge Bakage, “> the sum of ONE THOUSAND ($1,000.00) DOLLARS and Nelson THOUSAND ($1,000.00) DOLLARS, as attorney fees in full for services rende Woodson the sum of ONE red and Performed in connection herewith; and, Tt te farther eedered that the defendant pay the costs of Chile en to be taxed by the Clerk, This the 7th day of August, 1950. Allen He own atte th Judicial District u Fifteen BEE HE HS EK ess eA ORR NRC AORN ME A HEME EM ate eee ae MEE ME No. 4515- No. 4650= No. 4796- No. 482h- No. 4875- No. 4897= No. 4710- No. 471ll- No. 4847 - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --~ AUGUST TERM, 1950 Monday, August 7th, 1950 Frankie Sue Hilderbrand vs, marvin Wesley Hilderbrand, Nellie \ilson Thomas vs. Randolph fhomas, Alien Wade “hue, BNF. vs. Betty Pope Shue, -------.....00 Jennie S, Wilson, vs, Willie Lee Wilson, ---------....____ Kathleen wartin Thompson vs. Paden moore Thompson, ~~~--.. Continued Mary schafer Bagby, BNF. vs. Alan S, Bagby, -----~-~.. --~-- Continued C, B. myers & wife vs. D. 0, Cowan, Jr. et al, C. B. Myers & wife, vs. W. B. Crowson et al, City of Statesville vs. Grace Blackburn et al Thi S Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday morning, August 8th, 1950 at 9:30 O'clock, ; A) , Y y bitin Ve $4 ¥ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM 1950 Tuesday, August 8th, 195 This Honarable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, August 8th, 1950. No. 4865 North Carolina, In the Superiae Court Iredell County. August Term, 1950 Mooresville mills We a. W estmorel and ? Agent, Jury sworn and empanelled Vs. W. a Ferrell, | I Plaintiff, i | Defendant. { j 1. las the defendant the tenant of the plaintiff as alleged? Answer: Yes. 2. Vid the tenancy terminate, as alleged? Answer: Yes 3. What amount, if anything, is the plaintiff entitled to recover for rent? “nswer: Yes. Pay the mills their $2.00 rental fee from date of Notice served up until this date. $138.00 North Carolina In the Superior Court, Iredell County august Term, 1950. Mooresville Mills, W. H. #estmoreland Agent, mooresville, N.C, Vs. We Re Ferrell This cause coming on to be heard at the regular term of Iredell Superior Court at the term of August Court regularly scheduled and being heard before His Honor, Allen H. Gwyn and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it as set out in the record, as follows: 1. Was the defendant the tenant of the plaintiff, as alleged? Answer, Yes. 2. Did the tenancy terminate, as alleged? Answer, Yes. 3. What amount, if anything, is the plaintiff entitled to recover for rent? Answer, $138.00. And it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to the Possession of the pemises described in its affidavit and that the defendant is in ‘he wrongful possession thereof; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the defendant be remov ed from the said premises and the plaintiff be put in possession thereof and that the plaintiff have and recover from the defendant and his sureties on the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT } IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM, 1950 SECOND WEEK =--- AUGUST TERm,1950 Tuesday , August 8th, 195 Tuesday, August 8th, 1950’ yo: 4987 appeal bond the sum of $138.00 as rent for said premises from the 26th day of NORTH CARULINA, In the Superior Court, 0 August Term, 1950. March, 1949, to date and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the IREDELL COUNTY Clerk of this Court. Olin F. Torrence and wife, Allen H. Gwyn T nd is R.forrence, a Judge Piesiaing-————__ Somertile file Plaintiffs, Vs. J. D. Ervin, Defendant. ME AK AK IK Bx AK 3c 2) Dis 2k Hee as BS AK IK AK BK 35 Dik DIS BIC OC 2ik ie ake aie 2K 2K 3k aK Oe DEAE Ae rere oc ake No. 4887 North Carolina, In the Superi or Court This cause coming on to be heard at the regularly scheduled August ie SPEARS eos reer rene - punpaeransenlina ; = - ae peeps es Far spencers ied : ~ 1950 Term of Iredell County Superior Court before His Honor, Gwyn, Judge pe peers ores Iredell County, Au gust Term, 1950, Presiding, and a jury, and being heard; and by leave of Court first obtained, Olin F. Torrence and mooresville Mills having voluntarily come into this action and made itself a Lois R. Torrence , ; party plaintiff and adopted the pleadings therein, and the jury having answered Plaintiffs, Jury swown and ewpanelled: eee ae the issues submitted to it in this cause in favor of the plaintiffs and against . a aS So te SDDS ES Vs. the defendant as follows: Je D. Ervin 1. Was the defendant the teneant of the plaintiffs, as alleged? Vefendant. Answer. Yes. 1. Was the defendant the tenant of the plaintiffs as alleged? 2. Did the tenancy teruwinate, as alleged? Answer: Yes. Answer. Yes. 26 Did the tenancy terminate, as alleged? 3. What amount, if anything, are the plaintiffs entitled to recover Answer: Yes, for rent? 3. What auount, if anything, are the plaintiffs entitled to Answer. $3060.00. recover for rent? “nd it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs are entitled to “nswer: Yes. Pay to owner 360 and vacate immediately. possession of the premises described in their affidavit and that the defendant is in the wrongful possession thereof; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the defendant be removed from the said premises and the plaintiffs be put in poss- Bp. ession thereof and that the plaintiffs have and recover from the defendant and sville 7° W. Re. Farrell Wm pon the cal his ¥ ” a} ne 7 oP ‘th seal of this aoe for trial the defendant did not answer. Wherev? ti sureties on his bond, the s of $60.00 for the use and benefit of the his action op rele sneriss to call out the defendant to come in prosecute ; re wie releaf would ‘be granted, plaintiffs Olin F. Torrence and wife, Lois R. Torrence, as nt on said Olin Pe oe and Louise R Torrence vs. J. D. Ervin Ipon 6 call of this case for ¢ _o. ™ & . wHEREUPO! the Court h a - . r trial the defendant dis not answer. WHEREU: s recover of the defendant urt had the filgh Sheriff to call out the defendant to come in progecute it is further ordered that the plaintiff his action op the releaf j d would be granted, the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, Pewises to date, Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding TOR TE I RRR 3 Ae Jot tote eK eI RRR IR Oke Bek Rake Rok ie ae ae ae aie eae ai ae aieae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERm, 1950 Tuesday, August 8th, 1956 No. 4313 North Carolina, In the Superior Court ’ Iredell County. August Term, 1950, Bs Me. Campbell f Vs. ! Johnsie Campbell ! This cause coming on to be heard before the Presiding Judge and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in Couwpliance witn an order issued ip this cause in the may 1950 Term of the Superior Court of tredell County has paid the sum of $1,200.00 and costs to the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, in full settlement of any and all claiuws for Support and maintep. ance which the defendant, Johnsie Campbell, has or may have for herself and ming child, Frank Campbell, against the plaintiff. It further appears to the Court that the min@ child, Frank Campbell, was 18 years of age at the time the order in this cause was made in the May 1950 Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. The Court further finds as a fact that the plaintiff has fully couplie with the Order in this cause by paying into the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredel! ; Varolina, vounty, North, prior to August 8, 1950, the sum of $1,200.00 and court costs whic said sum is to be paid to the defendant, Johnsie C_amwpbell, in full settlement of any and claims for support and maintenance which the defendant, Johnsie Campbell, and her minor child, Frank Campbell, have or may have against the plaintiff, 2. |. Campbell, it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered, and adjudged that the aforesaid sum of $1290.00 pad by the plaintiff, R. m. Campbell, to the Clerk of Superior Court of lpedel County, North Carolina, be paid to the defendant, Johnsie Campbell, and that the Said “, mM, Campbell is hereby released and discharg# from any and all claims for Support and maintenance which the defendant, Johnsit Vampbell, and her infant Son, Frank Campbell now have or may have against the plaintiff, R. Me Campbell, This the 8th day of August, 1950. Allen H, Gwyn Judge Presiding OPED BRO HE BED 8 He oe NO ae Mae Re ete ae aac ac se ie ae sie ie este ae seme ax IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERm,1950 Tuesday, August &th, 1940 r No. 4799 North Carolina Iredell County We O. Morrison Vs. JUDGMENT W, C. Church and Vagie Church This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the Courts of the 15th Judicial District ami it appearing to the court that the parties have completely settled all matters and things between them- selves and that the Plaintiff now desires to take a non-suit. It is therefore, adjudged that neither recover further anything from the other and that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action. The action is dismissed. Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding Consented to J. G. Lewis Atty. for Plaintirr R, A, Collier Itty. for Defendants. ° A, se s'e ale we we se te ie te cle He He fe He ve MEK aeaie ae ae ac ae aie eric afc she shea aie afc ae vic afc aie she ae aie afe sic aie aie akc Noe 4902 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court, August Term, 1950. mrs. Gladys Quary Vs. Larry 0, Shives and Re Rs Cook This matter coming on to be heard before the undersiged Pre- Siding Judge and upon motion of Hugh G. Mitchell, Attorney for the defendant, Larry 0, Shives, it is hereby ordered that this cause be remanded to H. S. Douglass, Justice of the Peace Court, for clarification of the records therein and for further orders of the Justice of the Peace Court, and this by agree~ ment of plaintiff. This the 8 day of August, 1950. Allen H. Gwyn Judge residing HERE 2 Berea ae aene Reale a ae a aka a NEM aK RNG HE MEN I Mea Be ae ie Hee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «=«---- AUGUST TERM,1950 Tuesday, August 8th, 1950 CRIMINAL CASE No. 1369 State ! Vs i RECKLESS DRIVING Jimay Reece Wooten I the defendant through his counsel enters a plea of guilty of Peckless driving, The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the go wnon jail of Iredell County for a term of six months, to be assiged to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Voumission, and pay the Cost of the action. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of FOUR YEARS upon the following conditions: That the defendant pay at this term for the use and benefit of miss annie Sigmon the sum of 9160.C0, and that he pay into the office of the Clerk of the Court for the use and benefit of Annie Sigmon the further sum of $540.00, said amount to be paid at the rate of $30.00 per month, the first payment to be made on or before the lst day of veptember, 1950, and monthly thereafter until the full sum is paid. That he be of good behavior and apply himself consistently to legitimite, gainful occupation, and that he do not operate a motor vehide on the public highways of the state for & perod of eight months from this date. This pre vision is not intended to affect his license. ‘he Court does not intend to suggest a revocation of license so far as insurance is concerned but it is merely a condi- tion that he do not Operate a motor vehicle for a period of EIGHT MONTHS. The defendant is to give a bond in the sum of $600.00 for his appear- ance at each July Term to show that he is complying with this judgment. The cost to be paid during the month of August. No. 1370 State ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Nol Prossed, vs Jimmy Reece Wooten N THE SUPERIOR COUR SEO ND WEEK =-- AUGUST TERM,1950 Tuesday, August 8th, 1950 ’ NO 1,075 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. W. Allen Brown, Plaintiff, Jury swom and empanelled Vs. Foy Brittain and Eugene cies trading as Brittaih Lumber Company Defendant. What amount of lumber was removed by the defendant from the plaintiff's land? Answer: 88,457 ft. hauled from Broms. NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY W. Allen Brown, Plaintiff Vs. 7 Brittain and Eugene Baker, Trading as Brittain Lumber Vompany, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Allen i. Gwyn, Judge Presiding and a jury at the regular August Term of the Superior Court of lredell County, amd the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows: "What amount of lumber was removed by the defendant from the plaintiff's land? Answer: 68,457 board feet" And it having been agreed that the Court should answer any other issue arising on the pleadings and make all necessary computations to enter a proper Judgment in this action. 4nd it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendants have Settled all matters in controversy arising upon the second cause of action of the plaintirr set forth in the complaint upon an agreement that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of $25.00 in full settlement and satisfaction of all claims arising upon matters set forth in the plaintiff's second cause of action, Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendants have and recover of the plaintiff, the sum of $144.08 with interest thereonofrom the 8th day of August, 1950 until paid. the witness fees It is further ordered and adjudged that each party pay nd that the Of the in such party's behalf a witnesses appearing amd test fying ning cost and that the defendant be Plaintirr be taxed with one-half of t ® taxed with the other one-half of the costs of this action. Th Sth day of August, 1950, Allen 4 n wees EE A HEE HEN AR HCE He EA NE I A HEI He EH Nee Nee Ne 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT N TH UPERIOR COUR SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM 1950 SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM,1950 Tuesday, August 8th, 194 Wednesday, August 9th, 1950 No. 4790 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday NORTH CARULINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. August Term, 1950, yorning, August 9th, 1950. fosh607 NA In the Superior Court e ou © B. C. Howard i yORTH CARD LI perior Cour Vs. } IREDELL COUNTY August Term, 1950 W. C. Bell, Carroll Bell, i | et al, T/ AW. C. Bell & Sons forrest L. Reavis, Plaintiff, Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: L, Gordon Hayes, mrs, Valley Vs. JUDGMENT Raymond, Frank Hillar, mrs. Bessie Sherrill, G. R. Shaver, Fred Nesbit, Lloyd urs, Girlie Allen, sh i C Defendant, vhumate, E, E, Deitz, A. H. Boggs, S. Mm, Loftin, D. W. Goodin am WwW, wW, Moore Pending trial the Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Allen k. Gwyn, Judge Presiding at the August 1950 Term of Iredell County Superior Court No. 1374 LARCENY AND ReCsIVING and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendart have agreed to State It is ordered by the court tat the road sentence of 12 vs months heretofore entered be modified @s iollows; compromise and settle the controversy between them by the followings method. Fred Styers Judgnent or the Court is that the devendant be imprisoned 4239 in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of 12 Bach party will name one appraiser and the appraisers, so named, shall months, with leave of the Gounty Commissioners 1 e th / Aa J SLE. rs to use the : : ° . i 2 “ derendant in and around the county institution and vera, inspect the dwelling, which is the subject of the controversy, and appraise the same Jpon his frailure to be oi' &00d beuavior and abide by the i i : . : a, a a pra reasonable orders of the Sheriff and other Agents of the as of the date of completion, namely march 24, 1949, deducting from said appraised County Co missioners, the defendant to be transmitted to the : Menta” SE mon a 2 : — : ti ar} ut from the premises of the defendant and used State id chwas and Public works Commission, to be worked under value the mari value of the timber cut Pp its supervision, ‘ ; : . inthe construction of said dwelling. The defendant will pay to the plaintiff the appraised value, not to exceed the amount claimed by the plaintiff in this action. In the event the two appraisers, so named, cannot agree, the two appraisers shall select a third appraiser and the decision of any two of the three appraisers inwriting, shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs and assigs. The value placed upon said dwelling by the appraisers shall be incorporated in a judgment to be entered by the Court, which judgment shall constitute a specific lien upon the Property of the defendant, as described in the Complaint. Each of the parties shall pay their own witnesses and one-half of the court est, this cause shall be remanded to the Clerk of the Superior Court for the purpose of entering judgment, based upon the report of the appraisers as herein set out. The plaintiff having designated mr. Calvin Woods, as his appraiser and the defendant having designated Mr. A. M. Gaither, as her appraiser: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by consent of Forrest L. Reavis, Plaintiff and mrs, Girlie Allen, Defendant and W. R. Battley, Attorney for the Plaintiff and Seott and Collier, Attorneys for the Defendant, that mr. Calvin foods and mr. A, M. Gaither shall go upon the premises of the defendant and Th " a is Honorable Court takts a recess until Wednesday morning, August i, 3 ’ iA i ‘praise said dwelling and in the event said appraisers are unable to agree they shall select a third appraiser and appraise the value of said dwelling and render Vhedr report unto the office of the Clerk of Syperior Court in writing over their (-< WAR AT a Judge Presiding l IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «--=--- AUGUST TERM, 1950 Wednesday, August 9ti, 1950 signatures within fifteen days from this date. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that this cause be renande; to the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County and upon receipt of the report of the appraisers, the Clerk is authorized, empowered and directed to enter Judgment for the appraised vdue of the dwelling, not exceeding the amount Claimed in thi. action, which judgment shall be a specific lien upon the property described in th complaint. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that each of the parties sha)! pay their own witnesses and that the plaintiff shall pay one-half of the Court cost ; the defendant shall pay one-half of the court cost to be taxed by the Clerk, This the 9th day of August, 1950. Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding By Consent of: Forrest L, Reavis Plaintirr Mrs, Girlie Allen Defendant We. R. Battley Attorney for Plaintiff scott & Collier Attorneys for Defendant AS HK 2k AK SDS Me ae she ale aie aie aie aie ak BRAK AK DK d)k 2K Be 2)x d}e9)s 2/c 2)< NORTH CAROLINA j NORTH tOLINA, In the Superior Court. IREDELL COUNTY. B. C. Howard, Plaitiff, Vs. We C. Bell, Carroll Bell and C, B, Bell, Partners Trading and doing Business under the Partnership name of We C. Bell & Sons, Defendant. Evidence resumed and continued through the day. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday morning, 10th, 1950 at 9:30, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -~ AUGUST TERM,1950 Thursday, August 10th,1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday noring, August 10th. No. del LT NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA i Vs. { 1939 Ford Coach i Reg 18~5068656 It appearing to the Court that the above described automobile was seized by police officers, City of Statesville, Nortn Carolina for transporting illicit, intoxicating liquors on or about the 15th day of February, 1950, but that no operator was arrested at the time of said seizure; that there after said automobile was turned over to the Sheriff of Iredell County for disposition as provided by law; that the Sheriff of Iredell County advertised for the owner to file claim for said autowobile, but no claim was filed by the owner; and it appearing that rs. Mable D. Jordan has a valid lien on said automobile in the amount of $300.00 and that she filed a notice of said lien with the Sheriff of Iredell County in apt time; the said automobile was subsquestly sold by the Sheriff of Iredell County at which time, “rs. Mable D. Jordan became the last and highest bidder for the sum of $285.00; that John R. McLaughlin, Solicitor of the Fifteenth Judicial District, has indicated that he does not desire to contest the lien of Mrs. Mable D. Jordan. It is ordered that W. D. morrison, Sheriff of Iredell County be and he is authorized and directed to my the proceeds of the sale of said automobile; to urs. Mable D. Jordan, lien holder, after deducting expenses of the sale and officers seizure fees. Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding. eI RSI SIRI ROI I Ra Ca ICRI I CAC CI IEE ROK SAAR IEA IANA FERC HO HANS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --=- AUGUST TERm,1950 Thursday, August 10th,1950 No. 4790 NORTH CARULINA, In the Superior Court, IREDELL CUUNTY. B. C. Howard, Plaintiff, Vs. W. C. Bell, Carroll Bell and C. B, Bell, Partners Trading and doing Business under the Partnership name of W. C. Bell & Sons. Defendant. l. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alley in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. If so, did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his in, as alleged in the answer? answer: No 3. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $5000, No. 4630 IREDELL CUUNTY. Re C. Gibson, Plaintiff, Jury sworn and ewpanelled as follows: P. A, Eagle, Vs Hal C, Ostwalt, J. D. Cochran, Jr., Fred F. Brothero . Roy L. White, J. m. miller, Albert Powell, Tom Hoy? , wa J. H. Rodgers, B. P, 1 BE. W lder 4+ G. ilson and wife, Je We Ramsey” a Ts Sane ey ee ee Evelyn Watts Wilson, Defendants. what awount, if anything, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants? ‘nswer: $165.00 This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday morning, August 11th, 1950 at 9:30 O'clock, kk Vlei’) He Vy JUDGE PRESIDING / IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT SECUND WEEK -- AUGUST TERm,1950 Friday, August 11th, 1953 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Friday morning , August 11th, yuRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CuURT, IREDELL CUUNTY. August Term, 1950. nps. Gladys Queary j Vs | JUDGMENT OF NUON-SUIT Larry 0. Shives and i 2. EY Cook This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Honorable Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding, at the August Term, 1950, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the defend- ant, Larry 0. Shives desires to take a non-suit as to the defendant's counter claim ’ in the cause against the plaintiff as set forth in the record. It is therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the defendant's action for counter claim in this cause be, and the same as hereby non-suited and dismissed and that the defendants pay the costs of this action. This the llth day of August, 195. Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding we sea a sae Xe a ae a aa 9 BIE A ICA A ER A A AA A ACI A 2 Wo. 4830 NORTH Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term R. C. Gibson Plaintiff Vs. 2. G. Wilson & wife Evelyn Watts Wilson, Defendants. Upon motion, and by and with consent of counsel for plaintiff, and counsel for the defendants the foregoing verdict in the above entitled action is hereby set aside, This llth day of August, 1950. Allen H,. G ante udge Presiding Consented to: ttomeys for the Plain Dea Vi r ‘torneys for IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM,1950 Friday, August 1lth,1950 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. R. C. Gibson, Plaintiff, Vs. ORDER SETTING ASIDE VERDICT AND Z. G. Watts and wife, JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT. Evelyn Watts Wilson, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, am it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendants have settled all matters and things arising in this case by the defendants paying to the plaintiff the sum of $151.0; It is, therefore, upon motion of counsel for the plaintiff and counse) for the defendants, ordered, adjudged and decreed: l. That the verdict of the jury be and the same is hereby set aside, 2 That this action be and the same is hereby non-suited. 36 That the lien filed by the plaintiff against the land of the Defex ants in Lien Book 3, page 160, as described in said lien and the complaint, be came. 4. That the costs of this action be taxed against the defendants, This the llth day of August, 1950. Allen H. Gwyn Judge Fresicding Consented to: Land, Sowers & Aver Ketomneys tSr PINT aor agency Pearman & Winberry 0. ~ or e c De ae eke aa Nee Reale ae Reale a ale a ae ele ae ae eae A NCI NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Suprior Court, August Term, 1950. Bb, ©. Howard, i Plaintiff, Vs. )I We C. Bell, Carroll Bell and C. B. Bell, Partners, trading | and doing business under the Partnership name of W. C. Bell | & Sons, ‘aba? @ eo @. Defendants. | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at this Tern of th Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Allen He Gwym Judge Presiding, anda jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as set out 4° the record: = \ HL JrPEMm OUR UOUR SEO) ND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM, 1950 Friday, August llth, 1956 It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff have and recover judgment against the defendants for the sum of Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars, It is further ordered and adjudged py the Court that the costs of this action be taxed against the defendants by the Clerk of this Court. Allen H. Gwyn udge Tres ng _ENTIRES OF APPEAL Upon the bringing in of the verdict by the jury the defendants in apt time move to set the verdict aside am to be granted a new trial, motion being made on the following grounds: That the verdict in contrary to the wight of the evidence and also because of errors committed during the progress of the trial, those assigned and to be assigned. Motion upon each ground is overrulled, to which the defendant in apt time object and except. Judgment signed as appears of record. To the judgment and to the signing thereof the defendants in apt time object and urt. except and appeal to the Supreme Court. Notice of appeal given in open co Further notice waived. Appeal bond in the sum of $100.00 ag judged sufficient. The defendants, appellants, are allowed 30 days within which to prepare and serve statement of case on appeal, the plaintiff, appellee, allowed 15 days thereafter within which to serve countercase or file exceptions. Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding sete see tee ee te RR a RI AE RIE AEE AE AE A A \ He OUPERL OR UUR SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERm, 1950 Friday, August llth, 1950 if i North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. August Term, 1950, mrs. Eula B, Parker, Plaintiff, Vs. Allen Edmiston, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Defendant. Superior Court of 4+redell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Allen H, Gwyn, Judge Presiding, upon an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Clerk of this Court, and it appearing to the Court that G. L. Parker is a proper party to this action under Chapter One, Section 240 of the General Statutes of North Carolina: It is, therefore, ordered and adjuiged by the Court that G. L. Parker be, and he is made a party defendant in said action for the purpose of contributions with the other defendant, but is not made a party for the purpose of allowing the present defendant to ask for a recovery against him for damages suffered by the said present defendant, Alien Edmiston, and he is not allowed to ask for damages sufferei by him, if 7 action ataings the said G. L. Parker, he being made a party def- endant for the sole purpose of contribution as set forth in said statute. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that summons be issue by the Clerk of this Court against the said G. L, Parker commanding him to appear at the Court House in Statesville, North Carolina, within thirty days after service of same, together with service of copy of the complaint of the plaintiff and the copy the answer of the defendant, and to answer to the pleadings of the said plaintiff - the defendant within thirty days after the service thereof. It is further ordered by the Court that part of the answer of the defend! asking for a recovery by the defendant against the saiiG. L. Parker for dama by him be striken out from said answer before service of same on said G. L. Parker sien H To the foregoing order or juigment the defendant, Allen Edmiston, except? and appeals to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Notice of appeal given in ope vourt, Further notice waived. Appeal bond fixed at $75.00. By consent defendant allowed 20 days to service case on appeal. Plaintiff allowed 10 days thereafter “ file exceptions or serve counter case. n ng REISS OO ROO ROO SOR iA Ok Re INERT NOM IN THE SUPERDR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERH,1950 Friday, August llth, 1950 Southern Bearings & Parts Co., vs. BC Howard et al. Jack Robinson vs. Joseph Alexander Barber, we Ce Bell & Sons vs. H. Mm. Stamey, We Ce Bell & Sons vs. H. M. Stamey, Cherry Motor Co vs. Joe Mills, mack C. Josey vs. Keith Kelly et al, James C. warren vs. Carl Felts, L. We Hostetler et vs. David 2. Brown, J W Beaver et al vs. Raeford 4, \arren, Statesville Roofing & Heat Co vs. R. C. Church, In Re- Caveat to Will of Alonzo Reid, R. S. Barkley vs. mae L. Barkley, Continued Continued Vontinued Continued Continued Continued Continued Continued Continued Continued Continued Continued No. 4878 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk, Tucker Sanatorium, Inc., a Corporation of the state of Virginia, Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT Vs. Kk, D. Blakenship, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigy Clerk of the Superior Court of +redell County, North Carolina, on motion of Adans, Dearman & Winberry, attorneys for the Plaintiff, for judgment by default final, x the Court finds: 1. That this action was commenced in the office of the Clerk of the Supers Court of lredell County on the 25th day of may, 1950. 2e That summons was issued from this Vourt on May 25, 1950 to the Dheriff of jredell County for the Defendant, K. D. Blankenship, and was returnable as pri vided by law, 36 That at the time of issuance of the summons, an order was signed by tt undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, extending the time for the plaintiff to file its complaint to the l4th day of June, 1950. Le That the sumions, together with a copy of the Plaintiff's applicatiot for extension of time to file complaint, and a copy of the order of this Court extending the time for the Plaintiff to file complaint was served on the Defends K. D, Blankenship by C, R. King, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolité, on May 25, 1950, by delivering to K. D. Blakenship, the defendant a copy of the summons and a copy of the application of the Plaintiff for extension of tine file Complaint and a copy of the order of this Court extending the time to file complaint. 5 That on the 14th day of June, 1950, and within the time allowed by the order of extension, the Plaintiff filed in the office of the Clerk fo Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, a verified complaint in action. 6. That oh the 1th day of June, 1950, the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, issued an order direct of the ing the sheriff to serve the Plaintiff's complaint on the Defendant, K. D. Blakenship, 7° That the complaint was served on the Defendant, K. D. Blakenship, by Wade Moore, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, on June 20,1950, by delivering a copy of the complaint, together with a copy of the order for service of the complaint to the Defendant, K. D. Blakenship. 8. That the Defendant, K. D. Blankenship, has not filed an answer, demurrer, or otherwise pled in this action; that the time for the defendant to answer,demur, or otherwise plead has not been extended, and the time for the Defendant to answer, demur, or otherwise plead has now lapsed, amd no answer, demurrer, other pleadings of any kind or motion has been filed by the Defendant. 9. That the Plaintiff filed a verified complaint in this action which has been duly served on the Defendant. 10. That the verified complaint filed by the Plaintiff demands a sum certain in money on a gudgment entered by the Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County, Norti Carolina, on the 27th day of may, 1940, which judgment was duly rendered in the action entitled, "Tucker Sanatorium, Inc., a Corporation of the state of Virginia, Plaintiff, v. K. 4. Blankenship, Defendant"; that said judgment was in favor of Tucker Sanatorium, Inc., the Plaintiff in this action, and against the Defendant, K. D. Blankenship; that the aforesaid judgment was for he sum of $713.85, together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from July 26, 1938 until paid, and for court costs in the sum of $7.50; that the aforesaid judgment is recorded in minute Docket No. 25, at Page 308, in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of lredell County, North Carolina, and is duly docketed in Judgment Vocket No. 39, at Page 296, in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of /redell County, North Carolina, having been docketed on the 27th day of may, 1940. ll. That this action was commenced on May 25, 1950, and the aforesaid Judgment is not barred by the Statute of Limitations; that this is the first action on the aforesaid judgment. 12. That the Plaintiff, Tucker Sanatorium, Inc., is now and was at on Commencement of this action the owner and holder of the judgment described in the complaint in this action, and also particularly set forth in Paragraph 10 of this judgment, 13. That no part of the judgment described in the complaint in this acti, and also in Paragraph 10 of this judgment has been paid, and the Whole of saig judgment, principal, interest, and cost is now due and owing to th Plaintife, 1h. That the Court finds, from the summons, the application for order of extension, the duly verified complaint of the Plaintiff, the Minute Docket, and the Judgment Docket referred to in the complaint and made a part thereof, that the judgment on which the above entitled action is brought is not barred by the Statute of Limitations, and that there is now due and wholly owing to the Plainti: by the Defendant, K. D. Blankenship, on the judgment hereinbefore fully set out, the sum of $721.35 with interest on $713.85 at the rate of six per cent per annum from July 26, 1938 until paid, and with interest on $7.50 at the rate of six per cent per annum from May 27, 1940 until paid. 15. That the Court further finds that the matters and things set forth in the verified complaint of the Plaintiff are true, that the summons was duly issued, that the complaint was duly filed and duly served on the Defendant, that no answer, demurrer, or other pleadings have been filed, and the time for the filing of the same has expired, and that the Plaintiff is entitled to judgent by default final as prayed for in its complaint and set forth in the preceding Paragraph. IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, upon motiot of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the Plaintiff, that: 1, The Plaintiff, Tucker Sanatorium, Inc., recover of the Defendat, K. D. Blankenship, the sum of $721.36 with interest on $713.85 at the rate of sii per cent per annum from July 26, 1938 until paid, and with interest on $7550 at the rate of six per cent per annum from May 27, 1940 until paid. 2. That the costs of this action be taxed against the Defendant, bd Blankenship, for the use and benefit of the Plaintiff, Tucker Sanatorium, In, This 7th day of August, 1950. Clerk of the uper orth of Iredell Coun Y car olisi: PR IR BE FE BE AE HE IK HEI KC Bk He 3S 2 34k I a agai fc 3c afc afc ale ake akc ale alec ake ak lc akc ae ate neni speate af ae ae a ae 2 262 AE No. 4745 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County yooresville Cotton mill | Vs. : JUVGHWENT OF NON SUIT Jerter C. Jones | This cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing that the defend- ant has vacated the premises and paid the cost and delinquent rent: It is therefore, on motion of Z. V. turlington, attorney for the plaintiff, ordered and adjudged that this action be and the same is hereby non suited. This 31 day of July, 1950. C. G. Smith “Clerk Superior Cout No. 4785 NORTH CARULINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Roofing & Heating Co. intiff — i JUDGMENT | Defendant | Vs. R, C. Church This ¢ ause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon tle motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 25th day of Vetober 1949. And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint was served on the defendant on the lst day of November, 1949. And it further appearing tothe court that no answer, demurreror other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time for filing pleadings has expired. 4nd it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express the sum of THREE HUNDRED & 40/100 contract to pay & sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, a ee meee no eee a ($300.40) DOLLARS with interest thereon from September 5, 1947, NOW, THEREFORE, it is, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintis ut have and recover of the defendant the sum of THREE HUNDRED & 40/100 ($300.40) dois with interest thereon from the $th day of September, 1947, and the costs of this action. This 11 day of August, 1950. GC. G. Smith BEAK ARIK BK 2S RAS AS AK AKA AK IIE S75 DK A/S 2K I BIC DIK DIK DIK DIK DIC DIE DC DE DIE Dx DIK DIK BLDC DI< DR D|C DIS Dg BI DI 2,< BIg aK die aieaie ac No. 4881 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Before the Clerk James C. \arren Vs. Carl Felts this cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersign Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said action be and the sé is hereby nonsuited, this the 12th day of August, 1950. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court WE AE 2 DE IK IS BRD SK HE ais 2) aie OR De aie afc ale aie aleaic -,. afc aie ake ale aie afeaie age aheay aie 2¢ 3c No. 4877 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Francis zg. Cuis, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT Austin-Bunch Fum iture Company, 4 Corporation, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honor- able C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County; and it apye aring to the Court from the statment of attorneys for the plaintiff and defadant that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties crowing out of the employment of the plaintiff by the defendant or any other matter and that neither has a claim on the other by reason of said employment or for any other matter, and that the plaintiff has elected, therefore, to take a non-suit in his action. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that a judgment of non-suit be entered in the above entitled action. This 12 day of August, 1950. C. G. Smith Tlierk of Superior Court of Iredell County. Consented to: W, I, Ward, Jr. Attorney for the Plaintiff Adams, Dearman & sanberry—_—__— ttorneys for the Defendant se ese se se ae ne te eae see ee i ea a ME ENE 2 I 8 I TE oe 4913 in the superior Court ao i NORTH CéamUbLives simy - aici 5 Iredel1 County ‘ e Tis sy dads ZOUUW LL o Joins : | a. 3. Barkley i anuf acturing Plaintiff , Jonah Wilson and wife, paude Ue wilson is cause coming the Suverior Court of Iredell vounty, cause comi r on to O and bei os D ¢ ] f ; 7 ; & >) id being heard before the Honorable ¢ september 1950, and it he Court lerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carold 2 or Vou of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it erly hi: n the defendants on the sh, +- > Y ws yqn4 fran: : . f° a+ _ ’ 2 : to the Court from the : of the attorney for the Plaintiff thet ants and neither of them have filed Answer Turther served upc he said defendants in this action, tue said allowed | ow it aintiff all matters and things at controversy +s an action brought by laintiff arainst sh is docketed of record iintiff has now elected to take a non-suit in m i mens lien whi iredell asked for ‘Cp ig t aete * ey =! srefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that th the costs to be charged b ason of a contract, ry mi > 10L¢ eptember, 1950. contract 7 C. Ge Smith SN Tt @rkK OL ouperiaor yourt \Y onsented to: CA HAAR AE MEAS ACK NR IK ROAR ie DC DE De Dk ic 9 dea MR Re aR 3p ae IE 94 3 ac, sic ate aeale ae aac eas IC rn at a stake in Ol ilighway Lip; : i i 1 j j ] ' Ox” : \ r ’ \ wrt a Lye Organ corner, iM : ~% 114 relay ) ue 2 {72 oLes to i « ne saad Ld ade Clarke's corner, thence wv. — . ‘ »} . 2 I4r , ‘orner; thence W.vih nis Line lve 15 acres, more or less. vee Jeed ile of stones; small cedar, Lippard's he beginning, containing 25 for back reference to title. sonveyed by James , = : “e leed dated Feb. 21. 1] he iterister of Deeds of 4S, and founa tredell County” ty, No. 4553 ; North Carolina. In the Superior Court. Ve Ge omith Stork somes Count vos S superior Court Iredell County. lredel] /Ounty, N. as c.c. Johnston, Ben 3. Houston, Norman, ©. L. willer, Le P. J. De Beam and Je We Gudger, Ve 440 Kerr, Vse nhooresville Co-operative Creamery ,fnc. and XR. Jon Harris, President, and | . L, Furr, vecretary. 4@ ae TMiis cause coming on to be heard before the Honorab frank PM. Armstron aes EE SSS t Judge of the vifteenta Judicial District at Troy, NN - in chambers, on Resider he Superior Court the 9th day of sept. 195U, end being heard upon the t.otion in the Cause made in this matter an it appearing to the vourt th t notice of jefore the Clerk | motion was properly served upon the defendant to appear at tl Lin nd ve mentioned; Upon the hearing, tne defendant, jotion and the ‘ourt finds the following facts: it the time tne the Court that tie a ae , . -inally incorporated under the Jaws 0 tie er intiff sires t0 ge a ‘ — ee : anvass desires statutes of Norta ,@Oiina -overnin, n-sult: : er i assoc Lé tions ha i ii »t in t Fad vnereiore oruere ana ’ . ™ m e C ‘ C 4 } : + , . ed and adju is cause be and the same 1s F . ass bd a hat for a numbel!l ion, tre tne actson. oper d as a general corporation up until the tines mentioned. 2ptember, 1950. ev m f a . ae } + > mian That on oY dout tue . 6th aay of August, 474%, the deienu co-operative ring itself within the th Cc. G. smith "Tt ‘ter 8 ywendme to its charter. "Terk Superior Vourt wendinen t ‘our North Caras ‘ ; Iredell County,io . » tine the oroposed teupted to amendment wit; on «ur. oth, 19,8, there and outstanding a Restraining Urder issued by tne Superior Court, restraining the defendant ind its officers and Ss che s from holding any meeting, or adopting any uaend= ment to the charter. That in defiance of the vourt Injunction, certain officials of the defendant corporation attempted to hold a meeting and adopt the proposed auendwent set out in the sotion in this cause and ‘aused the sawe to be sent on the sae date by special messenger to Kaleigh to be y of state and it was so recorded with- secretar and notwithstanding the recorded in the office of the in the next day or tw, notwithstanding the Injunction fact that upon the trial of this cause, a written Stipulation was entered into, which is set out in the .otion in this cause that the proposed AWenduent, to the charter was not to be put into effect or adopted. Upon the foregoing facts, the Court is of the opinion t} nt to the charter was, and is, invalid and that it should be cancelled ! and = — i LTrom tne rec . } al ? raereu bone sf the ineri » fine a T ex ave eee : . f the Superior Court of Iredell County at vtatesville, N,¢ oras in the office of he vecretary of otate in I i h + t . id it is further ordered that it be cancelled of record in t} in the Neve 2 ee Ta jucrre th Judici.» na t the atteupte; NO. 1,907 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County. Before the Clerk Cc, E. Summers and C. A. Bolick, rs, tradi under the firm paremand style of Statesville Implement Company, Plaintiffs JUDGMENT Vs. J. Re Brown and wife, trena Brown, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiffs for judgment against the defendants by cefault final; and, It appearing to the court that verified complaint was filed am summons issued in this action on the 18th day of July, 1950; and, It further appearing to the court that said summons, together with a copy of said complaint was served on the defendants on tle 27th day of July, 1950; and, It further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer or other pleadings has been filed by the defendants and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; and, It further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract, to-wit: a note to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $459.59, with interest thereon from the 6th day of march, 1947, at the rate of six per cent per annum and that no part of said sum has been paid by the defendants to the plaintiffs ani that there is now due and owing the plaintiffs on said note, the sum of $459.59 with interest as aforesaid, said note being due on or before the Oth day of may, 1947: Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants, the sum of $459.59, with interest thereon from the 6th day of march, 1947, at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid and the cats of this action. This the 18th day of September, 1950. G. Smith Steak Superior Course er Pp ee eae Hee Re a aie a aR IR CAR RA 2 IIE HPI HE 7 ses EM eae ae 232i 2 9K a eer. re cancer oe ree A i . i i . H i No. 4905 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUP=RIOR COURT IREDEL]. COUNTY A, Nayhew Vs. JUDG ENT Karl Sherrill This cause coming on to be heard before Hon. C. G. Smith, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard and it appearing that a verified complaiz: was filed in the above entitled action on the 12 day of July, 1950, and that the Swuions and a copy of complaint were sent to the defendant on the 15 day of July, 1950, and that more than thirty days has elapsed since the filing of the sumons 2 copy of complaint; and that no answer has been filed. It further appearing that the defendant has paid the plaintiff since the filing of the complaint $160.00, which amount is to be deducted from the amount sued on by the plaintiff. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of tk defendant the sum of 3180.63 with interest from the 12 day of July, 1950; and thet the cost of this action to be taxed by the Court. This 26th day of september, 1950, C. G. Smith Ulerk Superior Court No. 4920 xoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Phillivs-Davis, Inc. Plaintiff, Vs. Foy ke Dagenhardt, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgwent against the defendant by default final; and it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint and sumions issued in this action on the 19 day of August, 1950; ind it further appearing to the Court that said summons together AY . * ‘ = c ; n Y ey aay copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the <4 y further appearing to the Court taat no a ‘ ap } Pandan an other pleading has been filed by the defendant 3 and file pleadings has been granted and that the time within Wi f Qo may be filed has expired; : — 2 . ae oui And it further appearing to the Court from a verified complaint : ° . } naar} Pr aw xT e the cause of action consists of the breach of an expr sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Two 590 90 . wi j S nereon from the 28th day of lay, eventy (5270.00) Dollars with interest the 1941; ; ‘ : : ; ‘J sude a decreed that Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and hh 9 r uh j a ed plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundr seventy (5270.00) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 26th day hay, 1941, and the costs of this action. This 12 day of Uctober, 1950. ¢. G, Smith . 7 TLerk of tne Superior Court Dik IK BK OK 35 AK AE DK TSK BRAK AK 3 2K No. 4796 Norta Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk onue 1is next friend jade t.itchell Shue NON=SUIT Vse Betty :ope Shue, j.inor cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorabi: plLerk of superior Cour ya ’ , ie : C iperior Court of iredell County, North Carolina, and /ourt from the statement of the attorney for plaintiff thet thines in controversy have been settled between the parties ani is elected to take a nonsuit in its action; it 1s therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff te suited and b aval «ht =} 1h ePaacte } } } } ited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. > 13 day of Uctober, 1950. Ce Go mith Clerk of Superior court of Iredell County, North Carolin: No. 4639 yoRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Alice W. Price Vs JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT John L. Price This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court, of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the matters and things in controversy have been sebtled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected to take a Non-Suit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, be non-suited and be taxed with the cost to be charged by the Clerk. This the 23 day of October, 1950. Cc, G, Smith Clerk Superior Court No. 4212 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Lorene W. Woodward Vs. JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Everette B. Woodward This cause coming on to be heard, am being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court, of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties am that the plaintiff has elected to tkke a Non-suit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that te plaintiff, be non-suited and be taxed with the cost to be charged by the Clerk, This the 23 day of October, 1950. C,. G, Smith Clerk ouperi or Court Tei Kieioiaieinies tolsieieieresoico tok iciei icici io ia ii gar Raa SOE IOI RI II HI AT es me ALA MIMTANM AATINM IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 This Honorable Court was opened by the Sheriff of Iredell County on vonday Morning November 6th, 1950 at 10:00 O'Clock, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning November éth 1950 at 10:00 O'clock. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TER:., 1950 ; WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8th, 1950 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, Nl. ©. on the Sth day of November, 1950, at 10:90 O'Clock A. |.., when and where His Honor, Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District of orth Carolina, Fall Term, 1950, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb V. Norris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial Jistrict of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. i, D, Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and opened Court by order of the Court. W. D. Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the November Term, 1950 Iredell County Superior Court, for the first week, to-wit: Sloan doy Warren T. J. Crawford, Jr. L. I. Dagenhart C. Me Newton W. F. Mayhew Lrs. J. Me. Holland Scott Glenn Mayes L. E. Blackwelder S. Re Holland Sherrill ¢. Glenn Shoemaker J. .. Templeton Robert G. Holland Glenn Mayes was execused to the January Term, 1951 Frank J. Owens Robert B. Stutts James Fink ds De T. de m ‘ Leo ile J. M. Templeton, Robert G. Holland, the Court Kitchings Troutman Barnett Kilby Robbins Spears and G. P. Scott were excused by L. E. Blackwelder was out of the State Frank J. Owens, Irs. J. M. Holland, S. R. Holland and T. W. Barnett were excused by the Court on Doctor's Certificates. lo. 717 state vs, dobert Watts No, 725 State vs t L, Nixon No. 74.0 State vs Manual Shoemaker NON=SU; PORT Alias Capias BASTARDY Continued under former order NON-SUPPORT Continued under former order ee pee ae en No. 940 State vs John Henry Summers No. 942 State VS. Unie L. Nicholson No. 953 otate VS. John W. No. 954 State vs itichard No, 990 etate vs Joe Johnson No. 1lO&4% otate vs Kddie Joines No. 1167 otate vs waddell Sawyer No. 1185 State vs Willie WwW. James State vs Nathan Patterson No. 1222 State VS. Billy Rankin NOsL2e7. State vs Ervin Shufford No. 1290 State vs George Lee Connor No, 1303 State vs James C,. Icenhour No. 1354 State vs in the SUPEHLUK UUUKT = FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 Wednesday, November 8th, 1450 LARCENY Alias Capias BASTARDY Continued under former order NON#SUPPORT Alias Capias NON=#SUPPORT Alias Capias JARCENY Alias Capias NO Clip] mm \ON@SUPPORT Continued under former order POSSESSING LIQUOR Alias Capias JRGLARY Continued under former order BASTARDY Continued umer former order LI®UOR pi c AND NON&*SUPPORT ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Vontinued under former order SPEEDING Alias Capias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order Benjamin Jackson Threatte,Jr IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 NOe 1360 | State j —.. \ grvin Feimster lo, 1361 State re Ervin Feimster No. 1362 State vs ‘ grvin Feimster No. 1363 State vs ; Ervin Feimster No. 1364 State vs Ervin Feimster = James B. Baker x a“ « t No. 1387 State vs Johnnie j.oten No, 1103 State vs Guy Ramsey No, 1321 State vs Flake Mullis No, 1223 State _ VS lula ae Carpenter lo, 1350 otate vs John Price Sherrill No, 1395 State vs C. P, (Soda) Johnson No. 1430 otate vs Rural Lee Shoemaker Wednesday, November Sth, 1950 FORGERY Alias Capias FORGHRY Alias Capias FORGERY Alias Capias FORGERY Alias Capias FORGERY Alias Capias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order FALSE PRETENSE Continued by consent RAPE Continued by consent MURDER Cont inued |. ANSLAUGHTER Continued by consent DRIVE DRUNK Continued for the Defendant DRIVE DRUNK Thue che ecm x RRA ARIS RITA A ATARI RAAB ERK RHI ES as and xkuskankear Continued No. 1431 State vs dlayton }.. Parks ie Nog 1427 & 1428 otate vs wayne J. Turpin were with the Clerk }5.00 per week until the sum of IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERI.,1950 Wednesday, November 8th, 1950 | DRIVING, DRUNK 1e judgment of the Court is that the defendant be jie in the comion jail of Iredell County for a term of SIL wane to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State iy,’ way and Public works Commission, and to pay the cost of the The prison a period of FOUR y 9 a AL u dant be of good behavior, and that he violate the state; that he apply himself repy)an, rainful occupation; that he work hard ana cian do not operate a motor vehicle on the publi¢ 1: ate for a period of TWO am ONE-HALF YEARS pe.” hat he deposit with the Clerk of this Court a cash bm: 400,00 for his appearance "y + } + Visiy and Aa he has lived up to the terms of ¢;;- jefendant is permitted to deposit one hundre: h bond at this term, the remainder of the ;-: r of 310.00 per we until the fullsy « period of suspension, if > of the suspension, the ua the defendan cash bond is + v + 0) . f Court yerenptorily ry Term, 1951. or Tuesday of ee caSe@eSe consolidated surt is that th oe oe Yar dgment of the Court is ts: Prison for a term 0 nce rs is suspended for 4 pon the following conditions: upon return from active service of sentenc irs given at this term, that the defendant procere wT that he work hard and regulariy alt <" mployment C f sood behavior; oo coats the Clerk of the Sourt for the use and benefit of the phe reinafiter na j imounts set opposite their respective “= ‘3 follows: lk's Je it e ii nfl ; eye tt » be hat he pay into the 4+ wv?) wal uU sav Vv } he partmer tore, bert. .arlin -eople's Loan Javings Bank Murdock Gurb i.arket t Sville National Bank Price Grocery Co k, 4 or . ] v4 } £ ) ) ek tes ian Sald amounts may be paid at the rate p5.00 per Tess Hs -irst payment to be made within 30 days following Ne te ictive service of sentence, the remaining installments oy vist! weekly thereafter until said amounts have been paid. to depos’ payment of these amounts the defendant shall continue nte coe + levos’ for his apr Leposited, said amount to constitute a cash bond for f susp? at the last criminal term of court during this d 0 if at the November Term of this Court, 1955, th up to the terms of the suspension, the cash bond him, That immediately upon his release he is to High Sheriff of this County. RIVE DRUNK 1) ene The defendant through his attorney, lr. H. G, Mitche plea of Nolo Contendere, rined 19” Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be cong to be. common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX )ONTH ant assigned to work under the supervision of the state Teton, Public Works Commission, and to pay the cost of the 3°9 upon prison sentence is suepended for a period of FOUR YEA paviot ® following conditions: That the defendant be of g00d ‘itu violate none of the laws of the state; that he apply nd thom Such legitimatel gainful occupation as his physical escle uP reasonably permit; that he do not operate a motor veh-O) rep! Highways of the state f least two yeare ( ont inued on page 233) - perace oF at the llovember Term o:-., ‘ Clement $250,00 has de | en io 1427 & 1428 State vs ; . wayne J . Turp in Noe 1275 State vs 1, F, Rhinehardt ve Ce No. 1348 State vs Neil wWike W-38 No. 1346 State vs Alvie Lee Gant We ~ y 14,08 State vs ~anford Davis No 1403 & 1403-A State VS. C=20 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOEMBER TER., 1950 Wednesday, November 8th, 1950 DRIVE DRUNK ( Continued from bottom of page 232) and at no other time following said TWO YsARS during the period of suspension unless he is so authorized by an order of Court in this cause; this cause being retained with defendant's consent for that purpose, FALSE PRETENSE The defendant through his attorney, ir. J. G. Lewis enters a plea of NOT GUILTY. Jury sworn and empanelled, At the close of the State's evidence the defendant moved for judgment of Non-suit. Motion allowed. Defendart discharged URIVE DRUNK The defendant through his attorney, |.r. John kK. |.cLaughlin enters a plea of guilty, “Ss charred Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of IX ..ONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, and to pay a fine of 5100.00 and the cost. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of THON YuaRS upon the following conditions: That he be of good behavior, that he do not operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways of the state for a period of wIGHTELN N from this date. mrtpe 4 aohe hide RIVE VRUNK The defendant through his attorney, enters a plea of guilty, as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendarmt be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of slid »ONTH to be assigned to work under the supervision of the Jtate Highway and Public «orks Commission, and to pay the cost ‘of the action. The prison sentence is suspended for a YEARS upon the following conditions: That the defendant be of good behavior and violate none of the laws of the state; that he apply himself regularly to legitimate, gainful occupation; that he support and main- tain his wife and minor children according to his reasonably ability; that he do not operate a motor vehicle upon the public highways of the state for a period of Tuo tS from this date. The defendant being without funds, he is permit ted to pay the cost of the action at the rate of 25! a week until the fullsum is paid. wr. John a, leLaughlin Jive dil ’ mere . pon SIT perl od of THREE Dp] wari Nol Prossed ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant enters a plea of not guilty in both cases. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of guilty. In No. 1403, the judgment of the Court is that the defendant ?, Gaither,Jrbe confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTEEN MONTHS, to be assigned to work under the super- vision of the State Highway and Public ‘Works Commission. In No. 1403-A, the judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the comnon jail of Iredell County for a term of EIGHTEEN JONTHS, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This latter sentence of LIGHTEN LONTHS is suspended for a period of FIVi YEARS upon the following conditions: That the defendant be of good behavior that he violate none of the laws of the state; that imnediately upon his return from active service of the sentence of “IGHTEEN L.ONTHS in No. 1403 the defendant is to apply himself forth- with to legitimate, gainful occupation, and that he pay into the office of the Clerk of the Court for the use and benefit of Sinclair Norman the sum of $30.00, and for the use and benefit of Percy Norman the sum of $40.00. . The defendant to pay said amounts at the rate of $5.00 a week until the full sum is paid, the first payment to be made within 30 days after his release from active service of sentence in 1403. a ene ee Tee ~a = eS ee 204 No. 1lh2h State vs Theodore Nixon No. 1404 otate Vs ; Linburg Price Ww=-l6 9th, 1950 at IN THE SUPERIOR-COURT FIRST WEEK -- NOVEMBER TER), 1950 Wddnesday, November 8th, 1950 }.URDER | The Grand Jury returns in open Court ina bos present) a True Bill of Indictment charging choy (etetteen Theodore Nixon with the capital offense of hurder bendant and figures as follows: in words "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR co IREDELL COUNTY, JR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1959 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: Theodora Nixon late of the County of Iredell. on the surat August, A. D., 1950, with force and arms at and in the day of County, unlawfully, willfully, feloniously and of his TF aforethought, did kill and murder one wartha Nixon contrary’. the form of the statute in such case made and provided =) °° against the peace and dignity of the State. ° in 4eb A. Morris volicitor, oe "No. 1424 OTATE Ve Theodora Nixon INDICTIONT MURDER witness Hattie Nixon x Helen Nixon x Dock Carr Lucille Fortner * Catherine Smith x Lula uae Lackey sugene Brown x Ur. L. B.Skeen vourtney Cavin Those marked X sworn by the un- dersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found A TRUE BILL. C. P, McNeely Foreman of the Grand Jury ne eee, | BRBAKING, SNTERING AND LARCENY i True Bill The defendant enters a plea li in th _ } of guilty as charged in the { Bill of Indictment, . F , This Honorable Noves** 9:30 O* clock, Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, he This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Thursday yorning, November 9th, 1950. No, 1407 State vs i“ Richard W. Wilcox W-17 No. 1405 State vs James W. Shepherd State vs Sam A, keavis No. 1429 state vs. Clannard C=48 .orrison No. 1360 otate vs Aaron P, Safriet n=38 No, 138] State vs Aaron P, Safriet Wa! No. 1351 State _ V8 *Teston Campbell Nas pols, 1368 hru State 393 vs. James B. Baker No. 1430 State jhoemaker ee ee ee ee nme pe NE IN THE SUPENLUN LOU FIRST WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERI.,1950 Thursday, November 9th, 1950 LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled: At the close of the State's evidence the defendant moved for judgment of Non-suit. Motion allowed. Defendant dis- charged, en ae ey oS merr Nol Pros With Leave ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant called and failed. Instanter Capias, Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and DRIVE DRUNK The defendant through a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of not guilty. his attorney, i.r. *red Hedrick enters RECKLESS DRIVING The defendant through his attorney, enters a plea of guilty as charged. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of vIa i.ONTHS, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, and to pay the cost of the action, It appearing to the Court that the defendant is now serving a prison term and will continue to serve for apnoxie mately 14 months; it appearing further that the damages done by virtue of his reckless driving have been satisifed: It is ordered that the prison sentence be suspended for a period of FIVi YZARS from this date upon the following conditions: That upon release from active service of sentence which the defendant is presently serving that he return forth- with to his home in lannopoli sabarrus County, and engage in legitimate, gainful employment; that he Support, maintgin and educate his minor children according to his reasonable ability; that he be of good behavior; that he do not operate & motor vehicle on the public highways of the state for a period of three years from this date, That the defendant pay the cost within NINETY DAYS follow. ing his release from prison. Lr. Hayden Clement JtiS, JRIVE DRUNK ; The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled: At the close of the State's evidence the defendant moved for judgment of Non-suit. Motion allowed, ATTEMPTED RAPE Not a True Bill FORGERY it is ordered by the Court that a Capias be issued for the defendant. DRIVE DRUNK Continued for the defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Wddnesday, November 8th, 1950 No. 1424 | }.URDER State The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a bod vs | present) a True Bill of Indictment charging the Theodore Nixon | Theodore Nixon with the capital offense of | and figures as follows: Y (eighteen defendant curder in words "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR CO IREDELL COUNTY. Jit COURT NOVEI BER TERM, 1950 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: th Theodora Nixon late of the County of Iredell, on the 7th August, 4. De, 1950, with force and arms, at and in the _ County, unlawfully, willfully, feloniously and of his mali aforethought, did kill and murder one wartha Nixon canny the form of the statute in such case made and provided = gainst the peace and dignity of the State. ' is Zeb A. Morris volicitor, "No. lL4k24 STATE VS. Theodora Nixon INDIC TiN witness Hattie Nixon x Helen Nixon x Dock Carr Lucille Fortner * Catherine Smith x Lula t.ae Lackey Hugene Brown X Dr. L. B.Skeen Courtney Cavin Those marked X sworn by the un- dersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found A TRUE BELL. C,. P. McNeely Foreman of the Grand Jury No. 1404 State vs ; Linburg Price W-16 BRUAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY 1 True Bill The defendant enters a plea of gui d in the ne © ilty as charged in Bill of Indictment, , . P ’ . sd This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday norning, Nov 9th, 1950 at 9:30 O'clock, _ enna vorning, No. 1407 State vs Richard WW. Wilcox W-17 No. 1405 State vs James W. No. 1402 State vs IN THE OUPERLUR UUU FIRST WEEK -=- NOVEMBER TER).,1950 Thursday, November 9th, 1950 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Thursday November 9th, 1950. LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled: At the close of the State's evidence the defendant moved for judgment of Non-suit. lotion allowed. Defendant dis- charged. LARCENY Nol Pros With Leave Shepherd ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant called and failed. Instanter Capias. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Sam A, Reavis No. 1429 State VS. Clannard CHh8 No. 1360 state vs Aaron P,. u=38 No, 1381 State vs Aaron I ‘ Wa3E No, 1351 State vs Preston Campbell Naw 13645 1386 thru 1393 It is ordered by the Court that a Capias be issued for the State vs, James B, No, 1430 State vs, Rual Lee DRIVE DRUNK The defendant through his attorney, a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned guilty. Hedrick enters torrison ict of not mA RECKLESS DRIVING The defendant through his attorney, enters a plea of guilty as charged. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined in the common jail. of lredell County for a term of SIx ONTHS, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, and to pay the cost of the action. It appearing to the Court that the defendant is now serving a prison term and will continue to serve for apnoxi- mately 14 months; it appearing further that the damages done by virtue of his reckless driving have been satisifed: It is ordered that the prison sentence be suspended for a period of FIVi YeARS from tiis date upon the following conditions: That upon release from active service of sentence which the defendant is presently serving that he return forth- with to his home in Kannopolis, Cabarrus County, and engage in legitimate, gainful employment; that he support, maintein and educate his minor children according to his reasonable ability; that he be of good behavior; that he do not operate 2 motor vehicle on the public highways of the state for a period of three years from this date. That the defendant pay the cost within NIN ing his release from prison. ur. Hayden Clement Safriet my RIVE DRUNK , The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled: At the close of the State's evidence the defendant moved for judgment of Non-suit. Motion allowed, Safriet Y ATTEMPTED RAPE Not a True Bill FORGERY defendant. Baker DRIVE DRUNK Continued for the defendant Shoemaker we No. 1422 State vs Mack Miller C039 t No.1303 otate vs James C, Icenhour No. 1426 otate vs Edd W. aU white No. 1404 State vs Linburg Price w=-17 that h y ry Pick é}? ‘é Th FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Thursday, November 9th,195 DRIVE DRUNK The defendant through his Attorney, Mir, a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned ; The judgment of the Court is that the detente of Buily, in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of sry outings to be assigned to work under the Supervision of th “Tk Mourns way and Public Works Commission, and bay the cost of ate High The prison sentence is suspended for 23 period of TERRC yectie, upon the following conditions: NSE YEARS That the defendant be of good behavior a i the laws of the state; that he apply himself rest? = legitimate, gainful occupation; that he work hard ante’ 7 money; that he support and maintain his wife and minor ene! according to his reasonable ability; that he do not aan motor vehicle on the public highways of the State fier: of TwO YOARS from this date; that he deposit with the Clerk the Court a bond in the sum of 2200.00 cash for his a a" at the November Tern, 1953, and show that he has liu ao” the terms of the Suspension, said cash bond to be paid at tt rate of 35.00 per week, the first payment to be made the fire Jecember, and weekly thereafter until the full sum is Hugh Meauley Enters - Mt the end of the period of Suspension, if aS iived up tothe terms of the Suspension, to be refunded to him, the defendant the cash bond is The defendant enters a olea of not guilty. ury Sworn and empanelled and returned a ’ s ANSLAUGHTER sne defendant through his attorney, br. Hugh licAuley enters: plea of not guilty. . vury sworn and empanelled: + nt ae } Yt ¢ ij ft the c+ose of the State's evidence the defendant moved for Judgement of Non-suit. Motion allowed, ’ val JA AAV Nol Pros With Leave 7m r ) Trar 22 AL ft UIN The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. a vury Sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of not zuil OtuakING, “NTERING AND LARCEN it ss Upon the count of feloniously receiving property knowing » " nave been stolen, the judgment of the Court is that the defer be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a ee State GONTHS, to be assigned to work under the supervision of” tate Nighway and Publie Works Commission, it Upon the count of larceny, judgment of the Court is that i defendant be CONFINED in the common jail of Iredell County !m" term of TWO TuARS, to be assigned to work under the supervis st of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. The are ence of two years is Suspended for a period of FIVE ar ear - first three years of the period of suspension and imet. S posowing the active service of sentence in this case the 4 eaahl be and is hereby placed on probation upon the Come ie orth in the order of probation and herein set forth as f0 That the defendant be of good behavior; that he vio he laws of the State; that he apply himself regular aoa! gainful occupation; that immediately upon his r er atti te Service of sentence that he report to the High 5h of 5 ait County and that he likewise report to Mr, Dan Rigby) cob as @; that he faithfully abide such reasonable adviee i dir of th, -e given him by Mr. Rigby and also the advice = che &! of oe Probation Officer; that he pay into the office the Pr! Offi e Court, at such times and in such installments ol pene! Dave Gu ray recommend, the sum of $24.00 for the use vains I unter; that within 30 days after the defendant ee g int office oo begin to make deposits of part of his earn ¢ wot ste the Clerk of the Court, said deposits to 8 eficer & (Conta te of $5.00 per week unless the Probation nued on top of page 2373 chain No. 1404 State vs . Linburg Price Wel7 Noe 1416 State vs David F. W=20 Smith Nay 1406, 1413 1414,1415, 1416 and 1417 State vs. Clifford C Hall (ewe) VPik a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK +-- NOVEMBER TERI.,1950 Thursday, November 9th, 1950 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY (Continued from bottom of page 236) a lesser amount. Said amounts SO deposited shall constitute a bond for the defendant's appearance at the November Term of this Court, 1955. If at the end of the period of suspen- sion the defendant has been of good behavior and otherwise lived up to the terms of the Suspension, said cash bond So deposited shall be refunded to him by the Clerk, ur. Dan Rigby, citizen of Statesville, comes into open Court and agrees to serve as frind of the court and as guardian ad litem to the defendant. to the end that he may advise, assit and encourage the defendant as to his conduct nd as to his employment and otherwise in his effort to rehabilitate himself, andims agreed to co-operate with the Probation Officer an report to the Court from time to time the progress made by the defendant or his failure to make such progress, DRIVE DRUNK The defendant tirough his attorney, ir. enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of Not- Guilty. John R. lclaughlin, FORGERY The defendant enters a plea of guilty in all six cases, Nos. 1406, 1413 and 1414 are consolidated for the purpose of judgment. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison for a term of ONE YEAR. In Nos. 1415, 1416 and 1417 the judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison for 2 term of FOUR YEARS. This sentence of FOUR YEARS is suspended for a period of FIVE YEARS upon the following conditions: That im ediately upon return from active service of sentence of ONE YZAR given at this term, that the defendant procure legitimate, gainful employment, that he work hard and regularly and save his money; that he be of good behavior; that he pay into the office of the Clerk of the court for the use and bene- “fit of the parties hereinafter named the \. Belk's Department Store, ~ rm amounts set opposite Forel 9.50 AV Foo Ge 8.00- 2H cle #24595” 41.33 He & 4YSG7 Jun ah & 14596 ly ede B p4599 11.7 WvAar¥ bdo >their respective names as follows: $20.00 - robert l.arlin Peoples Loan & Savings Bank 57.50 . l.urdock 1 MSD, 30.00 - Statesvill Bank 30 . QO - Price Grocery Co, 25.00— That said amounts may be paid at the rate of $5.00 per week, the first payment to be made within 30 days following his release from active service of sentence, the remaining install- ments to be paid weekly thereafter until said amounts have been paid. Following the payment of these amounts the defendant Shall continue to deposit with the Clerk 35.00 per week, dur- ing the remainder of the period of suspension, said amounts to constitute a cash bond for his appearance at the last Criminal term of court during this perial of suspension. If at the November Term of this Court, 1955, the defendant has Lived up to the terms of the suspension, the cash bond to be refunded to him, That immediately upon his release he is to report to the High Sheriff of this County. 535 Fraley St., a genes Augustus Turner N. C., comes into open court and agrees to serve as friend the court and guardian ad litem to the defendant Hall, to the end that upon the return of Hall from service of sentence that he will assist the said Hall in procuring employment, am will counsel, advise and encourage said Hall to be a good citizen and live up tothe terms of the suspension. He further agrees to co- Operate with the Court and law enforcement officials and make true and accurate reports of the conduct of the said Hall, whether it be good or bad; the defendant agreeing at the same time to abide all such reasonable orders and advice of the Said guardian, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Thursday, November 9th, 1950 GRAND JURY REPORT = NOVEMBER TER, 1950 The Grand Jury passed on all bills that were presented by the solicitor and foumd true bills in all instances, The following repairs have been made that were suggested at the 1950. last term of Court in August, Court House Clerk of Court } eak in the back of office has been repaired, kegister of Deeds Uffice been repaired and a new floor covering has been basement has been painted. shite l.ents Toilet lave been covered. A. Office been put on in the esp ectiv ve ly . ubmi tted. ’ C. P. NcNeely, Jr foreman of the Grand Jury. November Friday ! No. 1420 State vs Arthur F Wi-38 No. lheh state vs Theodora Qn XC) -.vyuU IN THE FIRST WEEK --- NO Friday, Novenher 10th, SUPERIOR COURT EMBER TER:.,1950 1950 This Honorabhe Court convenes according to ad jourment on iorning, Dingler Nixon November 10th, 1950. URIVE DRUNK The defendant through his attorney, enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a Not Guilty. (fy ) STA ugitien yy. Tae ye fendant enterd a nlea of \\by. the State. \4 Vidgment of fipied in the 7 TWELVE |! .ONTH m ORT Continued ’ moe + dl Sontinued until CReTerurerer aie: It is Qs: : I ¢ Ir A 1ed saa Vis of the Continued under former orde sd andais & Jontinued under former n piWViad Sontinued, under-former-order Continued IRIVE Sankt aee John ile verdict l.cLaughlin of SS IS _— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Friday, November 10th, 1950 RECKLESS DRIVING Continued i ie th Monday Morning, November 13 a a tly IVY Oou SIDING — OD IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -= NOVEMBER TER)., 1950 Monday, November 43, 2950 SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL CUUNTY. (OVE.BER TER, 1950 This Honorable Court convenes according according to adjourment on Monday lhorning, November 13th, 1950 at 10:00 O'Clock, with Honorable Allen H. Gwyn, A Judge Presiding, and Holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial Jistrict, Fall Term, 1950, present and presiding. D. fuorrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open and women Sourt the names of the following good and lawful men ‘to serve as jurors for this the Second \leek of the November Term, 1950, Iredell Superior /ourt, to-wit: piss Fannie Lou Gaither D. Mayes Slark W. Murff ‘ood D. Pharr hes, TT. A stwal 1 C. E. Morrow R, Mayberry TY o : we BAaANSLOTra B, E. Settlemyre John Isenhour J. P. Holshouser B. C. Robertson H. Powers Robert S,. Miller I H. Henderson , walter E. Killer GU. R. stone Miss Fannie Lou Gaither was excused by Doctor's Certificate _ oy Be Us Robertson, i Mayes and irs. T. A S soe w ¥é The following men shall hereinafter be termed the Jivorce Jury 1" to-wit: lLorrow, John Isenhour, Robert S. Miller, walter E, Miller, }.. D. Pharr, T. K. Mayberry, D. W. Hansford, Holtshouser, i. Powers, B. H. Henderson and C. RK. Stone 1 sathleen i.artin Thompson DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury ,1", being duly sworn and empanelled answered the issues submitted to it as follo | Ows: ‘aden loore Thompson nmr vor omer iWon is ccs —_ TAR AOlR™ Vill VAMOLINA [IN THE SUPERIOR CX Until, 7 ’ ” ’ > Tr TT ry VEMBER TER., 1950. JUUNIL Le 4 , athleen lartin Thompson * | VS | Paden Moore Thompson 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they ow husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, «. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived Separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, \ & SUPERLOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 Monday, November 13th, 1940 plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of y th Nor Carolina for mor han six months before the commencement of this action as a) » 4S allen, Ged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, In the Superior Court, November Term, 195 Kathleen l.artin Tt heard and being heard at this Term of the Carolina, before His Honor, Allen H, Gwyn, answered the issues submitted to vy against the cefendant, as set out in 3 ed by the Court that the bonds of same are hereby dissolved, and the he defendant, iwyn Presiding. in the Superior Court, November Term, 1950, wT 2h) Vii dd ‘use coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, Allen ding at the November Term, 1950, Superior Court for Iredell Count), varing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact: A “ at two minor chila oe years t two minor children, namely, Paden Moore Thompson, dr., age °? and Norma Jean Thomns 7, a er : ; 6 eon, age 3 years, were born to the marriage union between th plaintiff and lefendant, That the the Said minor children are now living with their mother, plaintiff, and have lived with and been supported by their mother, the plaintiff, Since the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on the llth day of August, 1947+ 3. And it further ‘appearing to the Court, and the Court finding 48 ® fact that the plaintirr is a fit and Suitable person to have the custody and contro IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SEDOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Monday, November 13th,195 of the said minor children, and that the best interest of Said children would be served by being in the custody of their mother, 4. It appears to the Court that a deed of Separation as recorded in Deed Book 216 at page 386 in the office of the register of Deeds for Iredell County was entered into by and between the plaintiff and defendant on August 11, 1947, in which the defendant agreed with the plaintiff to furnish to the plaintiff an allotment for the two children of the plaintiff and defendant in the amount provided for and allowed by the U. S. Army to depend~ ents of members of the U. 5. Army; that the defendant agreed with the plaintiff that in the event he should be discharged from the U. S. Army that he, the defendant, would continue to pay to the plaintiff the mount of the U. S. Army allotment for two dependents for a member of U, Je Army to the plaintiff for their two aforesaid minor children until the said children reach the age of 16 years. rranted full and complete Norma Dean Thom son, the That the hereinabove mentioned arreement between the plaintiff and defendant as to the support of the aforesaid minor children is hereby retained and the defendant is to continue to make such payments as set forth therein to the plaintiff for the Support of the aforesaid children, 3. This cz is retained for further orders. 4. it further appears to the Court that the above entitled action Was brougit by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant on the sround of two years separatioh, and for the custody of the aforesaid minor children, and that a judgment granting the plaintiff an absolute divorce from the defendant was granted at the November Term, 1950, of the Iredell County “uperior Court, This the 13 day of November, 1950. Allen H, Gwyn JUDGE PRESIDING. =< = — ee ares rere SS Sars \ HI UPER LO OU T SECCND WEEK -=- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 lionday, November 13th,1950 Noe 4897 lary Schafer Bagby, by her sali next friend, hrs. Mary P.Schafer DIVORCE Plaintiff The Divorce Jury jf" being dul Vs. empanelled answered the issues gs it as follows: Y Sworn ang Ubmitted to nD alan 5S, Bagby, Defendant H CAROLINA az DELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR court NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 i) avi IRL wary ochafer Bagby, by her next friend, Mrs, Mary P; ochafer, c aS alleged in the answer, “as the plaintiff been a resident of the otate of North Carolina fy» preceding the filing of the complaint in this action’ nt separate from the plaintiff and have they lived gf of two years or mae as alleged in the vomplaint’ y, DYefendant ee pe ee Pe mee This cause coming o heard tine } N ve coming on to be heard and being heard at the November Tern, ‘lor Court of Iredell] Goaunte 3 tte YW WC ge Pret t of Iredell /Ounty, before His Honor, Allen H, Gwyn, Judge ‘res Jurv ind a % . “s - il . a : ; : ° Ly vy sue she dury having answered all the issues submitted to it in ff the pnlai tae icin i ‘ : : the plaintiff and “6ainst the defendant, as fully appears in the. - vY “8, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofor xisti vy Veretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby diss q hea ” yd Ssolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an abdolute divor from the defendant, +nis the 12th day of November, 1950, Allen H, Gwyn Judge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -~ NOVEMBER TER). 1950 Monday, November 13th, 1956 No. 4903 5 uce Re Hart, 1 NDA opr DIVORCE ‘. The Divorce Jury 71", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: tary Louise Hart NORTH CAROLINA | THE SUPERIOR COURT Iredell County L spruce R. Hart ! ' Plaintiff, | Ve. i wary Louise Hart, | Defendant. | 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for at least six months next preceding the bringing of this action? answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff and the defendant lived separa other for two years next preceding the bringing of thi Answer: ¥es, UNTY spruce R, Hart, Plaintiff, } { ! Vs. { t } “ary Louise Hart, lefendant, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, 4. Gwyn, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November Term, of the Superior vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has deen personally served with summons, and the following issues having been Submitted to and answered by the Jury: ; ‘ 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes j «. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the state of North varolina for at least six months preceding the bringing of the action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from fach other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action?Answer: Yes Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff Spruce R, Hart, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce fran the defendant, Mary Louise Hart, and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant are hereby dissolved. This 13 day of November, 1950. Allen H, Gwyn Judge Presiding November Term of Superior Court of Iredell County. de ot Je ate she ote te ate slp ate ole te s's ge s'+ he ate a+ o'- s+ ste ate ate ote Bye HE NE BIC HE BEBE SE SYK BH SCSI BK SK SIE BIE IK BI Bc 3K Yk Bik aie sic alc ste aie ate Sk HS Se Xe aie ake IN THE SUPERIOR COURT : n SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 IN THE SUPERIO: UOUR onday, November 13th, 1950’ SECOND WHSK ee= NUVELBER TER, Monday, November 13th, 1950 1950 ’ No, 4909 No. 4917 Treva Wooten JIVORCH nd@ F. Haynes i TITH\DAwD Vs. The Divorce Jury rit being dul 3 JV Onmuds ome ; co 4 & ‘ y sworn and a : tae, : : answered the issues submitted to it as Follows neiied Vs. The Divorce Jury //1", being duly sworn and emp: : answers tne issues submitted to it as follows: har jorie Haynes IN THES SUPERIOR COURT ee mikes STATE iF WW RTH vs inOLJ NA ; OUNTY OF IREDELL. Vitae laynes ! l | | { haynes of North Carolina for: é eee : ay re Coe tis Has the Plaintiff been prior to the beginnin answer: Lies int married as alleged in this Complain: vere the Plaintiff and aintiff and the + prior to tne begin: COPS ME Es Oe ne ee ee el cause coming on to Jury, ’ son His Honor Al en of the Plaintif! is Honor lien iaving answered the issues ; ; in the record; 1, and decreed that the bonds of . is theref: ord d, adjudged, and decreed that t! laintiff and Defendant be and they Pe me ordered, aa) , C a natrir ony he . - . se . : 7 ai * ‘ ; ta i } - intiff is here} Nefende. “ony neretofore existing between the Plaintiff and Defendant be and the intiit is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the Defen . & y “re nereby diss and the Plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce Intive 1 . a : ntif f the cost of this proceeding. f rom the Allen H, Gwyn nee The P ‘ : . of this p seedinr. IDCE PRESIDING laintiff will pay the st of this proceeding Allen H, Gwyn Judge Presiding. J ‘ 1} , CF OUR SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Monday, November 13th, 19 TT vWD JL VuUitu lh The Divorce Jury /1", being duly sworn and em answers the issues submitted to it as follows renee . . IN THE SUPERTOR ¢ ' ¢ ) Tr . ef Our int] On CUURT * PPR mon iy V. 44 2D LULt fasted 1950, worth Carolin I i j } I i } i I i } i % it+ed —wUYVindUY ear appears in the reco. there was born of the marriare of the plainti. sil Hefner, seven years old, and that the pr Nay yue* child > and it f urther appearing to tne tne plaintiff is a fit and suitable person t0®” nila bs eee nat the best lor child, Patricia Gail Hefner, and that the woul sa a es a " ‘ tL. eins uld serve by oeing in the custody of her mother, she > le a ak ‘ , : n ior the custody of said minor, she es : natin rdered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of mat retofore existing betwe } . esvween the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same aii jj? ean? Ind } | Ssolved, and the »1- intiff * . Peni? is hereby er: fend ‘S hereby granted an absolute divorce from the de is further dere, be ® Ss Url rdered, Hefner, be ad ud«c 5 t 1 , or | Judged and decreed that the plaintiff, Madge 4. she is hereby awarded f anc Gail Hefner.This cause gel Complete care, custody and control of the ™ tained for further orders, This so, %,relates to the custody of the minor © Shes che 13th day of November,1950, Allen i a JUD & rate inor chi", chila, * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEIBER TERM, 1950 Monday, November 13th, 1956 B. Curtis ae oe ee DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury fl", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Jeorge G, Curtis NORTH CAROLINA, TATA IREDELL COUNTY, (la B. Curtis seorge G. Curtis Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry and are husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? answer: Yes Did the plaintiff and defendant separa and have separate and apart from ea he more than two ye: institution of this nswer: Yes. 3 Has the plainti en a bonifi sident of the ina for more than six months pric she institution of sed in the complaint: answer; Yes, tm. This cause coming on to be heard and being co the Superior Court of Iredell County North Carolina, before His Honor, Allen u, twyn, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues he Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defend- » 4S Set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds R os matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Ola B. Curtis, and the defer A } fac si “efendant, George G, Curtis, be and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside, and he ° ‘ i : } una the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Allen H, Gwyn Judge Presiding. ed Ss Seorremep sitet a cane eesti -ourt, ate the ‘use coming on to be heard redell County, North arolina, before His Honor, + Uli ncrevofore existing between the plaintiff, Lou D. IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TZRM,1950 onday, November 13th, 1980 TTP AT Mo VU The Divorce Jury 1", being duly sworn and em answeres the issues submitted to it as follows: Panel) ¢ RY omer TTT IN THE SUI RIOR COURT, NO VE) BER TER, 1950, tintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now hush tn 1e compl aint? J vw LUO De lafana o f Yi y der ¢ AMA aa each other eged in the complaint? . , : . en f th and being heard at this Term of the \llen H, Gwyt, “ Jury, @Hd the jury having answered the issues submitted t0 vor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out e f° “a ‘ } ee ‘ . ~ ' 01 “Petore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds ° whitley, ee wi } v7 } a 2 Se e . itley, be and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside by th D 94 2 ral . a = ‘ Plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Allen H, Gwyn omens” Judge Presiding. and the deft IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK =o oe NOVEMB BER oe Pu 1950 onday, November 13th, 195 Ho. 4935 oF m Call Jacks | eee Carehye | DIVORCE Vs. { Tie Divorce Jury i", being duly sworn and empanelled ( answers the issues submittea to it as follows: arthur Lee Jacks { NORTH oe ee IN THE SUP& COURT DU} NOViBeR TER, 1950 TORN Litto C IT ® Della Carolyn Call Jacks Plagntire Vs. Arthur Lee Jacks Defendant 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant inter the Comr pla 1int? Answer: Yes Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separa than two years as alleged in the yomplaint? Yes the plaintiff been a bona fide reside for a period of more than one = "nee, eon tne Complaint? answer: Yes, cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November Term of the Superior vourt of Iredell vounty, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been personally served with process and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the Jury: a : s 1. \Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully intermarried alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. . «. Has the plaintiff been a bona fida res _the state of North varolina for one ar next preceeding the bringing of nswer: Yes, 36 Have the plaintiff d defendant lived eparate ind i apart from for two years next prece ding the bringing action? Answer: Yes YY) Ada Now therefore, on motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorneys for the d decreed that the plaintiff, Della Carolyn it is ordered, adjudged, an be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, arthur Lee Jacks and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintirr and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, and that the Plaintiff be allowed to resume her maiden name of Della Carolyn Call. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this %ction to be taxed by the Clerk, All en H * Gwyn Judge Presiding (Allen H. Gwyn) This the 13 day of November, 1950. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT . ' t ECOND WEEK «-- NOVEI UBER TER), 1950 IN THE & SUPERIOR couRt ' SECOND WEEK aw NO VEL.BER TER 950 Monday, November 13th, 195 6 Monday, November 13th, i968 * No. 4937 [VORCE : on Mary Ellen Turner The Divorce dury /1", being duly sworn and empanel leq wary DIVORCE nsweres the issues submitted to it as follows: Vs The Divorce Jury /1" being duly sworn and v M4 A wy 43 oad answers the issues submitted to it as follows: woe Ti ¢, F. Turner Lili SUF ERI ( . Ir Ue 4u tues” ake ie OViE: BE] TER. NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Mary Ellen Turner ly VSe oe re No ae G, F, Turner » Jv + @ ou ndant marrie;: : Se es laintiff and the Complai vu answer Les +? Turner, f action? I i | i ' I i } i before eard and the jury having answere® $ that the bonds of matrimony Chi use coming on to idant be, and the same are heres) 79 Oi the superi sourt of hereby granted an absolute divorce from A scien H, Gwyn, Judge Presiding, and : jury and the jury having answered mitted to it in favor of the Plaintiff and : ains he defendant; be taxed by the Clerk of the Court 2 It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds heretofore existing between the Flaintiff, lary | Turner and a the p fend r : ie H, Gwyn ae e ant G, F, Turner, be and the same Presiding. Plaintir + 1S granted an absolute divorce from the defenda Allen i, Gwyn nv we VUYIUL PREG I! wt isUe io Ur Ur UUtT SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 , IN THE SUPERIOR COU lionday, November 13th, 1954 SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Tuesday, November 14th,1950° This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on RC} tuesday Morning, November l4th, 1950. Lt VC uuu the vivorce Jury 1", being duly sworn and empa nswers the issues submitted to it as Follows nelle Se eran > Upon convening of Court a memerial service in memory of IN TH SUPERIOR COURT OVEMBER TERM, toso ” Honorable John A. Scott, was held by the Iredell County Bar Association. It is ordered by the Court that a copy of the Resolutions passed Sn ne ene ene County Bar Association at this meeting be copied in the minutes by the Tredell of this Court, in respect to him and become a part of the minutes of this Court, RESOLUTION On Friday afternoon, November 3, 195¢ Jo} A one of highly esteemed and beloved lawyers in the State of North Carolina, stricken with a heart attack, kr. Seott wa ifty-eight years of age. John A. Scott was born in Point Pleasant, est Virginia, and was eight years old moved to Statesville from the State of . 7 7. —_ I vOLJIE Fe vor father coming here t that time to be lresident of l.itchell last fifty years of his life he was a resident and citizen of Statesville. 701A iss Anne Bell Walton on September 30, 1919, John A. Scott, Jr., i.rs. Frances son, Lieutenant Edgar Everitt Scott, fighting for his country in world Scott was not a seeker of public office, bi WaS a candida and was elected in sesssion o varOlina Senate, He served with di ineti i his body, served for Iredell Sounty, for the City of Statesville, the Iredell County Board of ‘ducation, and the City of Statesville School Board. for several years he was a member of the Board of Trustees of the State Hospital, l.organton, North Carolina, waving been appointed to this office by Governor Clyde R. Hoey. ur, Scott was very much interested in the legal profession, and waenever possible attended the meetings of the lawyers of his County, Vistrict and State, He served as an officer in the Iredell County Bar Association, the “iiteenth Judicial District Bar Association, and for several y of the Youncil of the North Carolina State Bar, Incorporated, Thee tt . . 1 mber a * $ ¢ o ni **2S Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Nove ur, Scott was interested in the development and growth of his er ~ NN £ . C nn ; e ; od ‘ . 1 ‘ - 4 L4th, 1950 at 10:00 O'Clock, omtunity, and gave of his efforts and time in this connection. At the time of his death } * ' : ca i i f his death he was President of Statesville Chair Company, and a Director aot ‘tr AS a Mitte’ ts que of the lurner Manufacturing Company, and the North Carolina Furniture Company, JUDGE PRESIDING. Incorporated, / as — TT rT ety r oi , — d Y : Y THe SUPERIOR COU WEE ee EM : EB 4 e VW , OND WEEK NOVEMBER T ath 1950 SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 SEC ] onday, November 13th, 195 Tuesday, November 14th,1950 Q aeiees This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Huett F, Grose , : oe tuesday Morning, November 14th, 1950. Vs. The Divorce Jury ji", being duly Sworn and empanelled nswers the issues submitted to it as follovs: Upon convening of Court a memorial service in memory of IN THs SUPERIOR COURT ' : 7] VEMBER TERM, £950 ’ Honorable John A. scott, was held by the Iredell County Bar Association. It is ordered by the Court that a copy of the Resolutions passed by the Iredell County Bar Association at this meeting be copied in the minutes of this Court, in respect to him and become a part of the minutes of this Court, hey now hyek : 1c. cre ' hey now husben: RESOLUTION RAN in ede On Friday afternoon, November 3, 1950, John A. wcott, one of the most highly esteemed and beloved lawyers in the State of North Carolina, while sitting at his desk at work, was suddenly stricken with a heart attack, ea reaching, : : , 7 and died before the hospital, Ilr. : was fifty-eig! rears of age. John A. Scott was born in Point Pleasant, west Virginia, a d eight years old moved to Statesville from the state of warn ~— father coming here t that time to be President of l.itchell College. last fifty years of his life he was a resident and citizen of Statesville. married }.iss Anne Bell Walton on September 30, 1919, and to this union were born there children, John A. scott, Jr., rs. Frances Seott i.ciilwee an irar Everitt Scott. His son, Lieutenant idgar bveritt Scott, was killed in line of \ dutty in 1945 while fighting for his country in world «war Lie Mr. Seott was not a seeker of public office, but on one ocassion waS a candidate and was elected in 1920 to serve in the 1921 sesssion of North ‘arolina Senate. He served with distinction in this body, served as Attorney for Iredell County, for the City of Statesville, the Iredell County Board of Sducation, and the City of Statesville School Board. For several years he was a member of the Board of Trustees of the otate Hospital, |.organton, North Carolina, having been appointed to this office by Governor rlyde R,. Hoey. ir, Scott was very much interested in the legal profession, and whenever possible attended the meetings of the lawyers of his County, District and State, He served as an officer in the Iredell County Bar Association, the Pifteenth Judicial District Bar Association, and for several years was a member of the Youncil of the North Carolina State Bar, Incorporated. iii. a hi Novesbe? iy, § development and growth of his this Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, r. Scott was interested in the deveioy & community, and gave of his efforts and time in this connection, At the time L4th, 1950 at 10:00 O'Clo: of his death he was President of Statesville Chair Company, and a Director , oe aA~“S - m Z ALittt’ / L Ys f the lurner h anufacturing Company, and the North Carolina Furniture Company, JUDGE TReoiDinNG. | Incorporated, feeeuuel \ vi UPEALUA UUTT SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 | Tuesday, November 14th, 1956 sp IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK == NOVELBER TERI ,1950 wednesday, November } 5th, 1940 Seott was interested in education, and pave hd 9 Bi of his time ang This Honorable Court convenes tccording to adjournment on Wed i - to ad: nment on Wednesday MiT*o means to hitchell College, Davidson Vollege and other educationa] institutions : he November 15th, 1950 e Morning, »vo , ’ ave ur, Geott was in all respects a christian gentleme e ° 5 I c gen emen ; and took an active part in the church life of his community. He was a member of the ws 0822 NOe 4Vee® First Presbyterian Church of Statesville, Flor about eight years he Was @ De a &con in his Church, and at the time of as an lder, having served jp this (REDELL COUNTY, Lillo ls dade official capacity for the past twenty-five years, For several years he was t) ; ‘ he The B, F. Goodrich Company, { ) teacher of the Men's Bible Class in his Church, and at the time of hie : 3 ’ > time of his death was \ Corporation, Plaintiff, began the practice of law in Statesville st interrupted when he entered yr T } 41e , i ve ( rid ar | tt | ws itto U» } ! . \ , . ' ‘ . ‘ £ . Ne ; from Service, ne re-opened 1s law offi an I a LAW Of! rire Cor) feath was actively and Continuously enpsy lefendant ‘ 4 ‘ . Onlidence not only of his fellow la mount is the plaintiff entitled to clients and the public, cet 51758, ily living, the character- which make a S, his services, nd state, ‘SSion upon a the Vine el Low iliflerences Aid om i mnt wi ft. } ; LONUS With ur professio rad4 in nd I] \uto Gervice mntlemen , 4 1i8- Loy i} interested 4 iis fellow men and the grown, : ; hie kine Ol munity ‘ .e and n ition and that his kin s ef ‘ , ‘ aU amount, if iny, é ‘ ng Vv niles will be ' . . , to so many peoples ‘ward Indebted tothe plaintiff? “Swer;: + 3 and Interest, : jered t a copy of this resolution be tence y in family of ir, Geott as an humble expression of our heartfelt sympath nis surviving t} oO} aa rp > » .. thelr erenaveme nt, tnat a copy be riven to ir, stobert A. Col jer, | iw ni "¢ © } ‘ . . , ‘ goci' parvner, that a copy be placed on the minutes of the Iredell County Bar ” Aah tion, and that this resolution he read at the memorial service in the Superior place? of ] ‘e > CG ‘ ane } ' ‘ rede] ounty, ind that the Presiding Judge be requested to have a copy upon the records of the vuperior Court of Iredell County «he 4 . ,! he! Thia II Cy rea} ’ ‘ Agee Nove this llonorable vourt takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, 15th, 1950 at 9:30 O'clock, ff! Af yy pf CLLLlE / ae JUDGE THES LULNG * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT -_ = " —— A Ja SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 a eye ec : Wednesday, November 15th, 1956 SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Wednesday, November 15th, 1450 IN THE SUPERIOR cuur SF JRT , r hli e Y a y ya n ae . ao on e Noe4O79- le Rochlin vs. 1’. o. west Construction Co,, ~--- Continued by Consent NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 D. E. Owens vs. Joe F, Turman et ai, Continued by Consent NO. 481 2- P i i 7 R Park c A aah daa 1 oe ; sLectric Company No. 4833- 19s. Hula B, Parker vs, Allen Sdminston, ‘ontinued for the Nefendant. This case to be set as the 2nd contested case at the January Term, 1951. No 1388 FORGERY We bss Mm, a } v, : ln } r m3 : State The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in ard before Honorable Allen Gwyn at the vs the comion jail of lredell sounty for a term of THREE months, ) 1 James Baker to be assigned to work under the supervision of the tate lligh- 2 way and Publi-~ Vorks Commission. or Court, and the cause having come w. <6 @ ah ving answered the issues Nes 1389 and FORGERY 1390 These two cases consolidated for the purpose of judgment as State follows: Let the defendant be confined in the common jail of laintiff reéoye: :. we Tredell County for a term of HIGHT i N'l Loe _This sentence of hi James Baker eight months is suspended for a period of FIV YuAktS upon the following conditions: That the defendant be of food behavior; that he violate none of the laws of the state; that he apply himself regularly to legitimate, gainful occupation; that he his wife and any minor children he may have according to his reasonable ability; that he pay into the office of the Clerk of the Court for the use and benefit of the several people the amounts set opposite their respective né 2$ follows: & 2 nay ‘ lent otore LO, iJ roc Jaid amounts to be paid in installments of first payment to be made within 30 days following from active service of sentence. Nog 1391 and FORGERY 1392 The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined State in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO YAS, ae to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State High- vames Baker way and Public Works Comission. The prison sentence is sus- pended for a period of FIV! YUARS upon the same conditions of Suspension set forth in Nos. 13&9 and 1390, No. 1393 FORGERY state The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined __ v8 in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TwO Ysiko, vames Baker to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State lli way and Public Works Commission, The prison sentence is suspended for a period of FIVe YEARS upon the same conditions as the suspension set forth in Nos. 1369 and 1390. In the event of breach of conditions, anyone or more of said judgments may be put into effect, said judgment to run consecutively or concurrently as the Court may deem proper. TP) ia — , ants? intiff entitled to recover of the defendants: ——_ see, ~ N ri U Lf Of U { SECOND WEEK -=- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 Thursday, November 16th, 1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK’ -- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Wednesday, November 15th,1950 Nos, 1433, 1434, FORGERY cad as 1435 & 1436 These cases are consolidated for the purpose of judgment This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on ent, State The judgment of the Court is that the defer : : } vs in the common jail of Iredell County for a ao Pep ont ined thursday Morning, November 16th, 1950. James Saker to be assigned to work under the supervision of the St en way and Public Works Commission, The prison Sentence fue High. for a period of FIVE YEARS upon the same conditions a Seer ene ; in Nos. 1389 and 1390, 5 Set forth No. 4647 lhe judgments in Nos. 1388 to 1393, inclusive at one and the same time, and Nos. 1433 through Sy, wise rendered at this term and at the same time the cir aT Tt COTIN' of all cases being taken into account in rendering th ean IREDELL COUNTY judgments. As a further condition of the suspension the ta ‘ * Statesvill ant agrees to pay all amounts outstanding for any worthless rn vaty 0° ee a” whether forged or not. As a further condition the defendant 2" ee to report to Baptist Hospital in Winston-Salem, imnediately fy Plaintiff owing his release for such examination as may be reasonably Plain necessary, and to take such treatment as may be necessary avd ee ane re herein reguired to be made within 30 days aiter his release from active service of sent Sn th . en ee Marrt event he is hospitalized following his service, chen Gta aan, he ator tondey i are to begin within 30 days following his release from the hospi pice aha "Gack fiat ie pita, J NeKee, sar i.cKee, ind’ the County of Iredell, are rendereq NORTH CAROLINA 39 are like. Vs. efendants coming on to be heard and being Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding at the November of Iredell County, and it appearing to the defendant action and except that it said property aintiff and, further, that its lien for hat of the plaintiff for local ing to the Court that the defendants have denied that improvements and have set up in defense of claim for same a certain deed to the plaintiff which they contend releases them from all liability for said local improvements; but the Court having been informed by counsel for all parties concerned that the matters and things which are the subject of this action have been settled between the parties, and it appearing to the Court that the settle- ment of said matters appears to be in the best interest of all parties concerned; NOW, THEREFORE, it is, by consent, ORDERUD, AVJUIGEI ND DECREED that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants Grace Blackburn, maggie Blackburn, Annie McKee, John McKee, Sarah Vivian Mckee, the sum of $303.87 for my) a a : ovembe! ” ta; 74 , a 6 i \iS Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, Nové xes due to the City of Statesville upon the property above referred to, which 1950 at 9:30 O'Clock, Sum includes interest and penalties up to and imiuding the date of this judgment; 4 jij) Poot he LAE 7 JUDGE PRESIDING / f N i SUPERIOR COUT SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 IN THE SUPGRIGR CUURT Thursday, November 16th, 1450 SECOND WEEK --- NOEMBER TERM,1950 Thursday, November 16,1956 that the County of Iredell's lien for unpaid county taxes upon said Property ig os 3. All furniture and fixtures are hereby awarded to ’ of equal dignity as that of the plaintiff and shall be paid from the Proceeds of 2 except defendant's personal belongings, roperty referred to herein; that the plaintiff have and recover of + 4. That the defendant shall until further orders of this court pro} " pay to the plaintiff the sum of Twenty Dollars on or before the ls day of f 3245.50 for local improvements in the nature of Street ass Ol e ESS. in front of said property, together with interest UPON said sym > each calendar month, beginning with the month of lecember, 1950, ind after th lst 5. Defendant to pay costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This the day of November, 1950, illen H, n uUWwyTl lhnae Pras 14 vudge rres ding Consent: the Court +t i 7 voris F, Lytle sell a portion of property herei: Plaintif ments, and other n ers herein mentions Grant _Bolmer ’ lho + ‘ Lioned - : ; . Kttorney for Plaintiff 977 4 , a yy pt 5 } ull, further ordered the: . . A Tay+ 7 Ye tie sy i Defendant Hugh i.. ic huley Attorney for defendant + the proceeds poses of dischargin; the Superior Court November Term ly The B, F. Goodrich Company, a -orporation, Plaintiff, VSe tto D. Tharpe, Trading and 40ing business as Tharpe Tire Company, Defendant coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor t the November 1950 Civil Term of the Superior 00 Allen H, Gwyn, Judge Presiding, anda jury at the November Term 1950 Iredell] the Court from the statement of counsel thé sounty Superior Court, and the following issue having been submitted to and nd settled all matters and things between bet “nswered by the Jury, as follows: "What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed; 1”) . , ‘ at A ne : ‘nat the plaintiff shill have possession of their home located 4% Answer: $1758.00, " said property c IT Is, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, THAT: venue in the Town of sooresville, North Carolina, loge a ss ' oi 1. The plaintiff, The B. F. Goodrich Company, a corporation, record oy entirety. Plaintiff's possession to be peaceful and without ® r ; ° } : . of i aq e : " ms tation, and plaintiff is to have all rents and profits from said house in event the lefendant, Utto D. Tharpe, trading and doing business as Tharpe Tire ‘ ‘ C OMpany . : r ’ she should decide to rent the same. any, the sum of Seventeen Hundred Fifty-eight Dollars (.$175&.00), together wi ville th interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from June 28, 1949, «+ Plaintiff is to assume the indebtedness now owed to Moores Wwntil paid, Federal Savi - T ‘ ederal Savings and Loan Association upon said home, j AE OP ru UU lr AAA SECOND WEEK -=- NOEMBER TERM,1950 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Thursday, November 16th, 1950 SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Thursday, November 16th, 1450 2. That the cost of this action be taxed against the defendant Nos. 4642 and L843 ’ Otto D. Tharpe, trading and doing business as Tharpe Tire Company, vw. C, Bell & sons, This the 16th day of November, 1950. Plaintiff, Jury sworn Allen H, Gwyn Judge Presiding t jid plaintiffs perform ard before His Honor, November Term, 1950 Iredell ing been submitted to and plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendanw , TT r . ar LAND): ; /y ideo GED AND Jia SREED: fhat the plaintiff, Southern Bearings & Parts Company, InCey recover of th Pee ee ae . Mees (se ee ee - % ‘ cal »f the defend ints, B.C. howard, Il, H. Howard and F, ?.. Howard, jointly and severally, and of the defendants, B.C. Howard, H. H. Howard and F. hi. Howard, partners, trading and doing business under the partnership name of H. & H, Auto service, the sum of Two Hundred Ninety-two Dollars and Seven Cents (3292.07), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from April 2, 1949, until paid, and together with the cost of this action to be taxed bY - Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County against the defendants. Allen H. G ge Presiding This the 16th day of November, 1950. Y THE UPENLUN UCODA SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERS,1950 Thursday, November 16th, 1950 Jury sworn and empanelled: Pe) U Fe —_—— — mount is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? [In the Superior November Term, 195 +}, ’ ° . “ te- to the Court in the bove entitled action from the sta’ nt f' attenaw ient 4 AULOrNevs 2 fo } , ~4 * ‘ ’ a $5 v6 tor the plaintiff that seita helly, one of the named defendant the above entitled act$ ce a ae j itled ‘ction, is a minor anc that, inadvertantly, a guardian ad Litem was no annai . ‘ . . : ‘ © appointed to defend said action in nis behalf and that a judgment ; was entered by default and inquiry against both | rs. A Kelly and Keith Kelly, ' We Ue ee eeananeaaennenneee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERN,1950 Thursday, November 16th,1950 that the plaintiff does not care to h Uile ‘ 2 to this action; Vv 1 apahy i } default and inquiry against the said action be declar and the ovember “e Ye unter & wife “PSe we S. Hunter i “PS. A. D. Creedmore Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: ik. &. Jarvis, J. D. Marlow, oe i - . Fa 5 : ’ ‘ ’ : , ww ** He Gatton, M, D, Pharr, D. W. Hansford, L. C. Wood, ©. E. Morrow, John ‘ ‘senhour, Clark Wi, hurff, T. R. Mayberry, W. H. Powers and C, R. Stone. Pending trial the Court takes a recess until Friday Morning,November 17th,195¢ " . 4 118 Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday hiorning, November 17th, 1950 at 9:30 O'Clock, é ‘2, wa udge Presiding oF ae ovemenon UOURs ; IN THE SUPERIOR CUUit SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER ork 1950 SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 Friday, November 17th, 195 Friday, November 17th, 1950 Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Friday } vu z ay “Ornine ‘ Sy what amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant ? Answer: 5204.19 Now, therefore, it is ORUERWD, have and recover of the defendant, ‘rs. W. CG. Ke ly, the sum of together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This 17 day of November, 1950, Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding, November Term ©» 7} 5 ‘ 75 . Yay? C +7dU ouperior Court of jredell VJounty. Se en 115 Cause be rdered hwy + raered DY vie 7 ) ° r vf 1©@ UlErk OL ——— ee — AREA OES. Ree — 5 cause coming on to vuperior Court of Iredell County, ‘wer loan ceiadin ’ 7 x mwyn, vua re rresiaing and ¢& ury, ¢ ~ . : .. } . * to it by the Court “S$ set out in the record: it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the matrimony lieretofore existing between the plaintiff, Iluett F, Grose, i IafawnA- : i . - P } 2 her tea Ts! Ss erendant, wozella 5S, Grose, be and the same are hereby dissolved and set and declared null and void and of no effect, and the plaintiff is granted bso) 1 At. 8osolute Givorce from the defendant. an 6 being heard before His Honor, Alle 2 T ior C Tred: H. G ‘ovember 1950 Term of the Superior Court of Ir Allen He Gwyn Judge Presiding ‘he Court that the plaintiff instituted the above ’ ~ 2 a. ae. ta } he defendant on the 17 day of May, 1950, and that ta “er t °PY Of the complaint was served upon the defendant, . he te i el ly E th ) vy ry Vane f , . t ‘ wed ¥) “Yy On the 19 day of “ay, 1950, and that within the time allo aw ha wr ay — . ad ° nearil the defend int, “ors, te ba] elly, did not answer said complaint; and it apt to the Cor hat 4150 oma a, . i : of $2 ure that a judgment y “efault and inquiry was entered by the Clerk Superior Court of Tredel] , ’ t this /Ounty on the 20 day of June, 1950; and the jury @ y* ha ; 5 Swarar } : ; term naving answered the lSSue as to damages submitted to the jury as follows IN THE SUPERIOR COURT — as N THR SIIPERTOR CONT SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 aman pee en COURT . Friday, November 17th b SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 = y, November 17th, 195 Friay, November 17th, 1956 271 * ’ * No. NAPTYT PADOT TH ; iat lirs. Rozella S. Grose, the defenda not | of the min hi NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court ie ie neler oneal allimuedirapa sa. TREYELL CouNTY ss ; nd she is hereby granted the ly andc ‘ol mi hild, Judy IREDELL CUUNTY. November Term, 1950 be, and sne 1S fi y & J ontro ninor child, Judy Ann Grose. Huett F, Grose, Jr. = ao + : : See 2. Huett F. Grose, Jr., father of the minor chil hall have the right and privilege to visit the child at the home o he mother at reasonable ORDER FOR CUSTCD — 4 Lad Wek 1 iN WW () / ;" Aty; Are _ . ny . yy Y AND SUPPORT OF pq} R CH intervals of time, at reason tin that he shall also have the right Gay 464 and nim, away from the home of the mother, nable part of the day on such sundays ea WL’ earda é nd eing ear vv ’ aa aaMy Adi dell! g 1e ara )¥ ils non I A en = sucn unde he } rembh 7” 1 950 T C Vv j ne Jovember Term 1950 Iredell Count; ouperior Court, the sum payment to commence on Saturday, was born to the marriage nas 7 week thereafter, with Having been born on August the Clerk mother of The cos ee 72 : jvin: with . ha +}, Apat ~ LIVIing witn nh motvner ne defendant, his cause is re ant, since the plaintiff ——es 4 i i during said time the Ce ee per week f: absolut livorce from the ads nA - + defend Nic ‘ nD aqeirena mi ne m4 1A minor call Ly now making. : oo 1 avin oer aintiff should be rect pte income, for the mainte that he should be rect-!* urt further finde se a ¢; , y . he mot! irt further finds as a fact that Rozella S. Grose, the motuer of ontinued mG asst + 4 i . ‘ * said r 1} ‘fg and suitable person to have the custody and control of sat ; fers ¢, wife vs at the best interest of said child would be served by the rvin, admr vs ont inued in the nero ann Asse , . ‘ per a, aa . i : . we control and custody of the mother at this time, with the fat vack Robinson vs, .. Barber, ---- Continued ind privilege to visit +} - war NOs 4876 a cue pri ge to visit the child, and to have the child ¥ é ‘eo Oe Hunter vs. irs. A. U. Creedmore, - vont inued as hereinafter s5 f i ; i et forth. varvis Furniture Co. vs. Robert sontinued Le TH SREP diy 2 ’ r ss f : “ s PU, ( RE AND DECREED: Joe D. Raymer vs, Thomas W. Griff Continued “ontinued ry ’ by i 7 ‘ . ‘\e Oe Barkley vs, ‘ae L. lio, Continued +h A, Keith Sheaby vs. James &, Campbell, -~------------ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Friday, November 17th, 1956 BANDONENT AND NON-SUPPORT The defendant comes into court and requests that ty amount required of him be reduced from 310.00 a Wak « 5,00 a week, which request the Court grants, with ] 0 however, at any term hereafter within the period of a. pension to increase the amount if the Court deems pro . The defendant henceforth shall be required to pay tate 2 office of the Clerk of the Court the sum of 35,00 per weet for the use and benefit of his wife during the periog . suspension, the first payment to be made Saturday, Novente, 25, 1950, and weekly thereafter. ber eave, ring to the Court that the defendant is 23 year: and is the mother of five children, the youngest beir: ight months old, and that she is a person of god — a 1, never before having been arrested or charged ii: any offence; that the killing in this case grew out ofa family row; that her mother-in-law and two sisters-ine-Lay appeared on the scene at her home in such manner as to con. stitute a forcible trespass, that a fight ensued, thet her sister-in-law, aged 13, was killed by a knife wound; that ty endant was not at fault in unlawfully entering the fight, probably used too much force protecting hersel! the Court being of the opinion under all t: at the ends of justice do not require this 5e imprisoned: herefore, ordered and adjudged that the sentence imposed be stricken and that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison for a term of two Ysako, | is further ordered that the prison sentence be suspended fo: period of FIVS YSARS upon the following terms and conditics That the defendant be of good behavior and violate none of the laws of the state; that she return to her home and children and that she care for and protect her children .ccording to her reasonable ability; that she otherwise be good citizen. o IN THE SUPERIO NOVEMBER TEF W. Beaver, Trading as i.idway Service and Supply, Plaintiff, VSe Raeford EE, warren, Jefendant What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: $97.92. TEN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 Friday, November 17th, 1950 yoaTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IRSDBLL COUNTY NOVEMBER TER, 1950 J, W. Beaver Vs. { ngeford E. warren { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Suserior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding, and the Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $97.92 with interest from July 2nd, 1948, until paid. That the defendant be taxed with the cost of this action by the Clerk of this Court. Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding NOITH CA! TN NUALNM VAL dita, TIINPT T ATTAIN IRSDE 5 we) COUNTY. Ruth Smith Plummer, | His Honor, n° This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before Judge Allen H. Gwyn, and a jury, and the jury having failed to answer all of the issues submitted; and upon motion of counsel for the plaintiff that the answers of the jury be set aside and that the cause be continued until the January Tern, 1951, of the Iredell County Superior Court: It is, therefore ordered and adjudged that the answers of the jury be set aside and that the cause be continued until the January Term, 1951, of the Iredell Superior Court. It is further ordered that the defendant be given 30 days from this date to file an answer in this cause if she shall so desire. It is further ordered that the defendant have custody of Tony Dwight *lummer, and that the plaintiff shall have the privilege of visisting the said child; that the plaintiff pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Cabarrus County the sum of $8.00 per week beginning December 2, 1950, for the ‘uppoft of Tony Dwight Plummer. This the 17th day of November, 1950. Allen = ae se ade ate afc afc afc afc ie ix Bc aie 2k aie Be aie ste she aie afc aie af she ac Bie she acai IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERI 1950 Friday, November 17th, 1956 Nos 4842 & 4843 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1950, C. Bell & Sons, Plaintiff, Vs. h., Stamey, Defendant. sons PI Plaintiffs, his cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Allen H. Gwyn, Presiding, and a jury, amd the jury having answered the issues Submitted to he Court in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs, as set out he record: is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover nothing of the defendant in said causes, and that the said plaintiffs be actions to be made up and taxed by the Clerk of this e costs Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding { Vs. | i1g Stamey | Upon the rendition of the verdict the defendant in apt time obJe moves to set the verdict aside on the ground that the verdict is contrary to te reich > th $q \ , ° . ro weight of the evidence, and on the further ground of errors committed in the preé Ss r Te : r : + - ress of the trial, such errors assigned and to be assigned. The motion is ove excepts» f the rulled on each ground, to which the plaintiff in apt time objects and To the judgment and the signing thereo n open Judgment signed as appears of record, plaintiff in apt time objects, excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court i Court. Further notice waived. The plaintiff, appellant, is allowed 60 days 1 0 which to serve statement of case on appeal; the defendant, Appellee, is aiioved days thereafter in which to serve countercase or file exceptions. Appeal pond * the sum of $100.00 adjudged sufficient, These entries in each of the two cases. Allen H, Gwyn BE se sie ae ae ae ae sea a ae ae ae fe a a ae a ae a sects al TT eT aAA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM 1950 Friday, November 17th, 1850 Ilo. 1,862 NORTH C CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY. NOVEN.BUR TERM, 1950 . warren, l Plaintiff, | Jury sworn and empanelled: Vs. Zs3is y, 3. Hunter and wife, “rs. \. Sel tunter, and urs. A. D. Creedmore, } Defendants. { 1. Was the Plaintiff's truck damaged by the negligence of its, or either of them, as alleged in the Complaint? and if so, Answer Yes Both parties ( All three defendants) 2. What damages, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants? answer .p4.00.00 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. 6 iis Warren, aintiff Vs. “. 3. Hunter and wife, TS, Wu. S. Hunter, and ‘TS. A. J. Creedmore, | Defendants, ' This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, ‘lien H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November Term, 1950, Iredell Superior Court, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury as follows: 1, Was the plaintiff's truck damaged by the negligence of the defend- ants, or either of them, as alleged in the complaint, and if so, which? Answer: Yes, Both parties. (All three defendants) 2. What damages, if any, if the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants? Answer; 3400.00, It is, therefore, considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintirr recover of the defendants, W. S. Hunter and wife, lirs. W. S. flunter, and “TS. A. Dy Creedmore, jointly and severally, the sum of $00.00, together with the “osts of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell “ounty, This the 17th day of November, 1950. Allen H, I ASS, appear, on udge Presiding os EE Secs peal on, pack of. eS ewe 7 THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 Fitday , November 17th, ‘1940 No. 4.862 warren, Plaintiff, ie 9. Hunter, and wife, Mrs. We. S. Hunter and Mirs. Ae D. Creedmore, Defendants. Upon the rendition of the verdict the defendant in apt time objects and moves to set the verdict aside on the ground that the verdict is contray to the vaght of the evidence, and on the further ground of errors committed in the progress a + l 5 a7 aAeatina p. 4 } ¢ et my . : yf the trial, such errors assigned and to be assigned. The motion is overrulled » + ground, to which the plaintiff in apt time objects and excepts. Judgment sime . soe of record. To the judgment and the signing thereof the plaintiff in apt time objects, excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court in open Court. Further notic aived. The plainti appellant, is allowed 60 days inwhich to serve statement L case on apr jefendant, Appellee, is allowed 30 days thereafter in which t: serve countercase or f » eptions. Appeal bond in the sum of 100.00 adjuged sufficient. . the two cases, NO. 1423 | POSSESSING ud UOR state _ +t is ordered by the Court that the former entry of the H a 1 . Judgment of Twelve months on the roads be and the same is her lenry Fleming Stricken out. We 5U } avy ; ; Prayer for judgment continued with leave of the hg oe enter judgment at January Term 1951, Defendant being directt to areney in Court at the January Term 1951, under his preset bon erect} ‘ sontinued ’ “7 ¥ Ont inued o. 1410 otate ] ot vs William C, Taylor aban Ld - frue Bill TP ee ees Nee ese ee NS PO EEOC EO N H UP Or OUR SECOND WEEK = NOVE}BER TER). 1950 Friday, November 17th,1950 4,783 NORTH CAROLINA, IN the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. November Term, 1950 Mrs. Kathryn J. Kinder ' Pl laintiff, Vs. c, H. Kinder, Executor of the “state of R. L. Kinder, deceased, Defendant. ) This cause coming on to be heard, ami being heard before His Honor, Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding at the November Term 1950 Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman and jinberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, and Robert A. Collier and Craige yraige, Attorneys for the defendant, that a full and complete settlement of the matters and things set forth in the complaint have been agreed on as follows: l. That the plaintiff be paid from the Estate of R, L. hinder the sum One Hundred Seventy-five Dollars (3175.00) in full of her claim for services alleged in the complaint. That the debts and cost of administration in the Estate of R. l. Kinder, including the One Hundred Seventy-five Dollars (3175.00) to be paid to the plaintiff as above set forth, be paid from property devised to C. li, hinder by the Will of R.L. Kinder. 2 se That the cost of this action be paid by the defendant. IT 13, THEREFORE, by and with the consent of the plaintiff and defend- ’ ant, ORDERED, ADJUUGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Une Hundred Seventy-five Dollars (3175.00) in full settlement of all services which she alleges were rendered to the said R. L. Kinder, and in full settlement a . " . le. es a ? | T of all claims of every kind which the plaintiff has against the Estate of kK. L. Kinder, 2. That the plaintiff's recovery of One Hundred Seventy-five Dollars (9175.00) be paid from property devised to ©. H. Kinder by the Will of R. L. ed to Kinder, and that Robert C. Kinder, Jr., nor his property, nor any devis him under the Will of R. L. Kinder shall be liable for the payment of the aforesaid sum, 3. That the cost of this action be taxed by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County against the defendant. . LE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM,1950 ' SEC OND WEEK pe ene pos ais" Friday, November 17th,1950 Friday, November 17th, 1950 This the 17th day of November, 1950. : Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding That the debts and cost of administration in the “state of R. L. Kinder Consented to: are to be paid from property devised under the Will of R. L. Kinder to C. H. > aban i: i i SRE Kathryn J. Kinder Kinder. Plaintiff L Adams, Dearman & Winberry, by C. B. Winberry ‘ : iad baa i aml ‘Attorneys for the Plaintiff That the cost of this action shall be paid by the defendant. C. H. Kinder IT IS, THERMFORE, by and with the comsent of the plaintiff and defend- Executor of the Jstate of x. L. ee UDGED AND QERD: Kinder, deceased ant, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND Diced: 1. That the plaintiff, Robert C. Kinder, Jr., recover nothing from C. HH. Kinder C. H. Kinder, Individually he a ‘ Sut wn ‘ eee the Estate of R. L. Kinder on the claim for services sued on in this action. Scott & Collier By i, A. Collier . Ke ‘ leahia f —— - tt >, That Robert C. Kinder, Jr., is not liable for any of the debts Craige & Craige - i ; : ‘ ; Tee Oe sone ee ws ttorneys for the Defendant and cost of administration in the ustate of x, L. Kinder, and that his one-half A 1ey h interest in the 7i-1/4 acre tract of land hereinbefore referred to and the per- sonal property bequeathed to hin, hereinbefore referred to, shall not be liable for any of the debts and cost of administration in the Estate of R. L. hinder, TN TUR SUPERTOR cour a ha] liable for the payment of the money legacies unde IN THE SUPERIOR COURT and shall not be Pay ) 5 IOVEMBE WR >) to the grandchild of R. L. Kinder. NOVEMBER TERM, 1950 to the ¢ ildren of R. L. t YK T 2 he Aahta ana ims ni otf : h ‘sta xobert C,. Kinder, vr. hat the debts and cost of aami: ition in the ist Pleintiff, ; . sick ia 2 Ga ea ae are to be paid from property devised H, Kinder by the Vs “we kinder, « Kinder, Executor ’ . : se xed by the Clerk of iperior he Estate of R. L. { 4. That the cost of this action be taxed by the Clerx of the ouperior r, deceased, Jefendant ' of Iredell County against the defendant. a al : ne al 1) 10n This the 17th day of November, 1950 This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor, Allen “d . a eee a Fa ‘ ; = al Allen Hi, Gwyn wwyn, Judge Presiding at the November Term 1950 Iredell County Superior Court, a Judge Presiding ciein pelican . ; a consented to: appearing t } ) h s+ a ] fj rneys t : ppearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorné) Robert C, Kinder, dr Kinder, p > f. r the plaintiff. and Rob An114 1 . / . f sqaseecly Pidintiil, and wobert +, Collier and Craige and Craige, Attorneys for the Adams, Dearman & Winberry, By ©. H inberrv lan & WW By Cc. H. w \ Attorneys Tor the Plaintiif ve H, hinder , sue ; uxecutor of the Estate of sn 1 i a us o . . wo the complaint have been agreed on as follows: ‘. 4, Kinder, deceased sof Kinder - Kinder, Individually A 9 n ry * scott & Collier - R. A. Collier That the plaintiff is +r ; a ee : im for ~ ae ; ; plaintiff is not to recover anything on account of his claim! vraige & Jraige ,Attorneys for the Vefendan Jefend hat a f nc ave Va h i efendant, that a full and complete settlement of the matters and things set forta l, my services alleged in the complaint. > ~e That the plaintiff is not to be liable for any of the debts and costs of administrati i he Est: Ks administration in the Lstate of R. L. Kinder, nor for the payment of any be thereof, and that the plaintiff's One-half undivided interest in the 71-1/4 acre tract of land devised to the father of Robert C. Kinder, Jr., and the personal property bequested to Robert 6, Kinder, Jr., under the Will of R. L. Kinder is not jabl » to be liable for any of the debts and cost of administration in the Estate o R. L. Kinder, and is ren of not to be liable for the money legacies to ‘he grandchild Re L. Kinder under the Will of Re L. Kinder ™ (OS, “a In the Suverior Court NT efore the IREDELL COUN La We Hostetler, i Trading as Hostetler Lumber Companv } VS. " David %. Brown j This cause comine on to be heard before the undersimed superior Court, and it appearing to the court that the iction on June 6, 1950 and the sum..ons and complaint were served on 7th, 1950, that more than th days have to answer the complaint, 3297.19 with interest from Julv is entitled to judgment It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed th: Pa. EE recover of the defendant the sum of 3297.19 with interest from 1947 until paid, and for the costs of this action. This the 2lst day of November, 1950. Saati ——<——e Se Ge, omith sLerk ouperior Court phic CRORE WOT A Oe ~— i In the Superior vourt November Term, 1950. P, Robinson ( V VS. lagdalene Shuemake Robinson | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Rowan County, North Carolina, before His Honor, «iien H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding,and a jury and the jury having answered the issues he submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against t a ndar ; : defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing bet»-en the plaintiff, J. P. Robinson, and the defendant, Magdalene Shumake Robinson, be, and the same are hereby dis- Solved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Certified to be a true and correct copy. Alien}. Oe Th a “Judge Presiding. y is November 22, 1950. Cra Maie Ugaell, Deputy Clerk Superior Court, Rowan County, N.C. Ate (CLERK? S SEAL) ae North Carolina, In the Superior Court, ‘ a a oN ; e QE “ This the 22 day of November, 1950. Iredell County. November Term, 1950, , ' P, stobinson vudre Presiding. SS AoOnry Vw \Yy "TT m T AY ‘ . 7" ‘ ORDER FOR CUSTODY Al. ] ree he ; re and ‘reet copy This November MP TNA AUNTT Nop oe ; Certified to be a true ana correct copy. This N ib CF MINOR CHILDREN = Shumake Robinson Vera liaie Uzzell Z mi. 2 . om s . l : . 5, et Say ao te . This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, Aller Jeputy “Clerk cuperior Lourt, : Rowan N , Judge Presiding at the November Term, 1950, Superior Court for Rowan it appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as — ( See below for filing) two minor children, namely Sylvia ilaine Robinson, age 12 Filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Vourt in Iredell years; and Lynda sugene ‘tobinson, age 9 years, were born to the marriage union - North Carolina on the 24th day of November, 1950. y, N between the plaintiff ami defendant; that the said Sylvia Elaine Robinson was Ae J. wilson leputy Clerk ind that the said Lynda Eugene Robinson was born on minor children are now living with their mother, th h their mother, the defendant, since the plaintiff oe ee 4th day of September, 1945. it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as fit and suitable person to have the custody and \ ; i ) ; we “it iy \ inor children, and that the best interest of said children custoc of their mother, if at a 78D AND DECREED: she is hereby granted full and complete ‘nad control of Sylvia “laine Robinson and Lynda Eugene Robinson, the alort minor children; that the plaintiff be permitted to visit the aforesaid mind iildren at reasonable times, +} u + ° an ® ¢ nf ~ * . at nance she plaintiff pay to the defendant for the benefit, maintenant iforesaid minor children the sum of 367.50 per month, the Sa payTeeNe TO lence on the 15th day of December, 1950, and said payments shall thea h man } = a : : a Au] vid vnen de made n rate of 4 Pe ) per month until the aforesaid ninor child oys' ,Laine itobinsc : oO « anne ® ° no. i at »binson |} become 18 years of age, to-wit; until February 14, 1956, wh + i ° 3 +he vn ne saic + wT nawm a 4 - which time the said monthly payments shall be reduced to 350.00 per month and ¢ nov +e ‘fc \ ‘ aid payments of 350.00 per month shall be payable each month thereafter until the ® Lunds 2 ei a ynea sugene “obinson becomes 18 years of age, towit: until August 10, 195% 4 3 This cause is retained for further orders. 7 e , sai ie : a . a prow" it further appears to the Court that the above entitled action was by the plaintifr f d of twe or an absolute divorce from the defendant on the groun yea sena i —_ ivorce years paration, and that a judement granting the plaintiff an absolute divor “~M) } Pin A ie ba Sure” from the defendant was granted at the November Term, 1950, of the Rowan County ~" SS SS North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1950, Js P,. mOobinson Vs. ORDER FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT ‘ L OF MINOR CHILDREN Magdalene Shumake Robinson This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, Alle Presiding at the November Term, 1950, Superior Court for Rowan appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as nor hF } 9 nt s er r s . nor children, namely sylvia ilaine iobinson, age 12 years; and Lynda bugene tobinson, age 9 years, were born to the marriage union between the plaintiff amd defendant; that the said Sylvia Elaine Robinson was T that the said Lynda Eugene Robinson was born on inor children are now living with their mother, tke their mother, the defendant, since the plaintiff iow a det O f September, 1945. further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as ¢ lant is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and hildren, and that the best interest of said children of their mother. GED AND DECREED: she is hereby granted full and complete Sylvia ilaine Robinson and Lynda Eugene Robinson, the alor inor children; that the plaintiff be permitted to visit the aforesaid minor siren at reasonable times, pay to the defendant for the benefit, maintenance minor children the sum of 367.50 per month, the sai¢ payments to commence on the L5th day of lecember, 1950, and said payments shall then be made at the r: Ln , . ‘ , ; ‘1d Sylvé then be made at the rate of 367.50 per month until the aforesaid minor child 9} 4 aj : itob i Ss y : Q e ° . mt . at laine obinson has become 18 years of age, to-wit; until February lh, 1959, wha > 2 hoe aadA i ‘ he which time the said monthly payments shall be reduced to $50.00 per month om payments of 350.00 per month shall be payable each month thereafter until the 5° vynda sugene <obinson becomes 18 years of age, towit: until August 10, 195% ‘ *nhls cause is retained for further orders. i ie aes : prowl it further appears to the Court that the above entitled action was ey ee ee wo by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant on the ground of © ve En: i ' i ivorce years separation, and that a judement granting the plaintiff an absolute diver from the defendant was granted Supe? at the November Term, 1950, of the Howan County County, This the 22 day of November, 1950. Allen H. Gwyn Judge Presiding. Mm), +4 9 “YO anv te N amber Certified to be a true and correct copy. This November 2c, Vera l.aie Uzzell coe ft ace a we . ee rt Veputy “lerk vuperior vourt, Le | °° fv nT ( Rowan County, Ne Ve ( See below for filing) ia il a a as 1 Filed in the office of the Clerk of the superior Court in Iredell cr q North Carolina on the 24th day of November, 1950. ~ J. Wilson leputy Clerk + sevVsUON A ry —* ne upreme VOU. ee ee U), and execution is se oe 8 to fincn \ 4 Ten ’ . ) , - ; t) hosnital indebt ss nereinoerore of ‘ Ol vil A ’ . ey! nthly sum + 2n re nan Cul S ior vile > i le. further Aining amount in judgment, then unpaid, atisfied judgment. ° ‘ ipre 4 } . >¢ Gr Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, and decreed that lat 7) » } 3 f «ajsy } and she plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the Sum oL Six hundred and fifty dollars ($650.00) to be satisfied in accordance with the terms anda i] Conditions as set out above. a ae ( >, G, Smith This 6 day of December, 1950. 4 oem . “= , Clerk of ouperia Court Finch & Chamblee “y frederick G, Chamblee, Attorney for Plaintiff attorney for defendant He Mere ik 363, Now 4954 NORTH GAROLTMA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL , F. Wilson : bointiff, Vs. warshall F. Crouch and Ruby C, morrow, d.b.a. 37 Yellow Cab Co., and Johnnie Huffman, Defendants. l l ' JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT ‘ ! THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, and being heard, by the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it being made to appear to the Court that the parties hereto have settled, compromised and adjusted all matters and things in controversy lrein: IT IS, THEREFORE, upon motion of counsel for the plaintiff, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUGED that the action of the plaintiff be and it is hereby dis- missed, This the 13 day of December, 1950. C. G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County,North Carojina. \E CONSENT: J. F, Wilson Plaintitr W, Re Pope & Z, ¥, Turlington Attorneys for the Plaint SMATHERS & CARPENTER By R, Hoyle Smathers Attorneys for e Reren ants IK 26 2x Ne aie Bie oak No. 4958 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Industrial Bank, Inc. i Plaintiff Vs. Otto D. Tharpe Defendant ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, c. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of 4redell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the facts set forth in the Complaint filed in this cause, are true and that the plaintiff hac in their possession the autom- obile set forth in the Complaint and the plaintiff is entitled to the relief asked for and has met the requirements of GS 1-121 and has served a copy of the summons and Complaint on the defendant on the 15th day of November ,1950. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $900.00 with interest from October 10, 1950 until paid at the rate of 6% per annum. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the saiq auton. obile be sold at public auction for cash and that the proceeds of the Sdle after paying all expenses, be applied to the payment of this Judgment, i. further ordered, adjudged and decreed that Neil S. Sowers be and he is hereby appointed Commissioner by this Court for the purpose of selling the said auto. mobile described in the said Complaint at public auction after due advertise. ment as required by law andafter making such sale that the purchase price be applied first to the payment of all court cost and the cost of the Sale including storage and commissioner's fee and taxes, if any, and that the remainder be applied to this Judgment and that the said Neil S. Sowers, Commissioner make a report of his receipts and disbursements as required by law. This the 21 day of December, 1950. CC. G, Smith er uperior Court CORE 3 OR aR a ae a I a a a a Re a ke ae ake ak ac ea aie ea a ke ae a akc a a ai ai ak ak aa NO. 4981 NORTH CARULINA [ CARULINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL CUUNTY J. B. McNeely and A. F. Gabriel { T/A Mooresville Oil Company | JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Us, 1 F. G. Hall | mrt THIS CA SE + USE coming on to be heard, and being heard by the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it being mde to appe: ppear to the Court that the parties hereto have settled and adjusted all matters and things in controversy herein: z ‘ mr > > T 1S, THEREFORE, upon motion of counsel for the plaintiff, CUNSIDERE, RDERED : AD JUDGE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action of the plaintiff be and it is hereby disait This the 21 day of December, 1950, C. G, Smith erk of the ouperior ourt © Iredell County, North Caroli HE AK DEMS He oie ah he ake ae he he ate ae ate at EAE HER CR Se ae ae Re ae ae ae ie ae eae ae ala fe a ae ake ake aa a a a cae ea a No. 4964 NORTH CAROLINA INTHE SUPERIOR COURT | IREDELL COUNTY } ve & J. Finance Corporation, | 1 Plaintiff } i i] Vs. | JUDGMENT r i R. O. Campbell, Defendant 1) THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the Honorable C,. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell of Iredell County, and it apparing to the Court that summons was issued in this cause and an order for claim hat the summons was laim and delivery, but it further appearing to the Court t never served upon the defendant nor the property in the order for c and delivery ever taken; and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is willing by reason of the avove circumstance to have said action dismissed; NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the above action now pending in this Court be dismissed, and it further appears to the Court that all costs incurred have been paid. This 22 day of December, 1950. C, G, Smith @ierk of the Superior Court Me Xe He De a Bis 2s IE BIE IE BIS 3S she BEDE 2K 2x SIS BIE AIK IK 2 aie afc afc x 3k Me oy HE NE IE Ot IK He aie afc Bik ak ae ais aye ae aI 2h No. 4932 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR cour? IREDELL COUNTY. Mrs. S. F. Avery, { Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGHENT Vernon E, “ackey, an individual, and | Holmes Drug Co., A Corporation, } Jefendant. This cause coming on to be heard by consent and agreement of the parties, and being heard before His Honor, Frank M. Armstrong, Resident Judge of the Fifth eeth Judicial District of North Carolina, in which Iredell County is located, at the Court House in Wilkes County, State of North Carolina, upon the demurrer of the defendants, as set forth in the said demurrer of said defendants, and upon motion of the plaintiff to be allowed to amend her pleadings, all as set forth in said pleadings. And the Court being of the opinion that the amendment of the plaintiff should be allowed and in his discretion allows the said amendment of the plaintiff, The said amendment being set forth as filed with the Court, and the Court being of the opinion that the said demurrer to the complaint as amendei should »e swpained as to the defendant, Vernon E. Lackey, and overruléd as to the defendant, Holmes Drug Company; NOW, THEREFURE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff's motion to amend said complaint be allowed and the same is allowed, and the demurrer filed by the defendanta, to the complaint as amended be, and the same is sustaine # Holmes Drug to the detendant, Vernon E, Lackey, and overruled as to the defendant , Company. The defendant Holmes Drug Company is allowed thirty days in which to file an answer. Frank i, Armstron ' Nesident Judge of the Flee Judicial District of No Carolina. r To the foregoing judgment the defendant, Holmes Drug Company, exter! font Further Notice waived, Appeal fixed by appeals to the Supreme Court of North Carolina, fixed at $100.00, The defendant said defendant is hereby allowed the time law in which to make up and serve its case on appeal, Plaintiff allowed the tint permitted and fixed by law to file and serve exceptions or Counter Case. This December 13th, 1950, Frank mM. Armstrong — Resident Judge © et Pifteenth Judicial pistri of North Carolina. 16 PS AE OK RE Ik 3Ye he ah 2c he ake ake ake ole ake ake ale she aie aie ate ois afc ate ae ale afc aie ae ae 26 No, 4934 yoRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Statesville Insulation Co. JUVDGiAENT Clarence =. Vernon and ——— irs, Clarence E, Vernon { Vs. ' { ' This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Court and it appearing to the Court that this action is for merchandise sold and delivered and installed and that the charges amounting to $255.86 are fair and reasonable: That this action was started on September 2lst, 1950 by filing complaint and that summons and complaint was served on the defendants on vept- ember 23rd, 1950; that more than thirty Jays have expired and the defendants have failed to file any peading herein; that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of 5255.88 with interest from January lst, 1950 until paid and that the defendants be taxed with the cost of this action. This January 12th, 1951. te Ge Smita SiEmE OF THe SUP a, Peper On CoUnT ULinhK UF HE 9 Por OF wUUald No. 4929 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CuURT IREDELL COUNTY Smith-Douglass Co., Inc., and \ N. B. Mills Gin Company-PLAINTIFFS ! Vs. { rman | Graham J, White, DEFENDANT THIS CAUSE COmING ON TO BE HEARD- before the Honorable, Carl G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon sniiaaii plaintiffs for judguent against the defendant by default final; and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on the llth day of September, 1950, and an application filed on said date by plaintiffs asking additional time in which to file a complaint, and that said order was granted= by the Court permittin plaintiffs to file their complaint on or tatn the 20th day of September, 1950; and that on the 12th day of September, 1950, the summons, together with said order and application were served upon the defendant; And it further appearing that the said complaint in this action was filed by plaintiffs on the 20th day of September, 1950, in this Court, and that said Complaint was served upon the defendant on the 20th day of September,1950; And it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurrer, or othé pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired, to wit, on the 20th day of October, 1950; And it further appearing to the Court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay 4 sum of money fixed by the contract, namely the sum of Four Hundred Twenty-four Dollars at Ninety- 5 ety-One Cents (3424.91), for fertilizers sold the defendant by the plaintiffs, all ; in s if i as set forth in said verified complaint, with interest thereon from the first day of August, 1948, until paid; NOW EREFORE IS ORJERE D OW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORJERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT the plaimtift hav e and recover of the defendant the sum of Four Hundred Twenty-four Dollars and Ninety-One C £ : ‘ y-One Cents (5424.91), with interest thereon from the first day of august) until paid, and the costs of this action. This 15th day of January, 1951. C, G, Smith Eten of the Superior (* Bie 2c aie bik sic ote she ate ake ae ale sie sie aie 3! oie HE SSI NOMI Be 3 CR I aE ee aE a ae a ae a a a ae ae a ac ea a a No. 4962 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR CoURT THE Straus Company, Inc. Plaintiff I I Vs. : Raymond J. Collingsworth Defen den t I This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the court that complaint in this matter was filed on November 14, 1950, and service of sun- mons was made on the defendant on November 23, 1950, and that the defendant has not answered or demurred or otherwise plead in this matter within the time allowed by law. And it further appearing to the court that this action is based upon 4 contract for money had and received and the amount asked for is a definite fixed sum, and the court finding that the above facts are true. motion of Land, Sowers and Avery, attorneys tiff have and It is therefore upon the ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plain dred uighty-eight and 73/100 for the plaintiff, recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hun ($288.73) Dollars with interest on the said sum from April el, 1948, until paid, and that the plaintiff recover the costs of this action. This the l&§th day of January, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of the superior Court TE ONG a aR I aR I OR 28 aR aR ae on an Be ae I IR AB I OB AR IB a 6 ee tad No. 4890 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY STATESVILLE INDUSTRIAL BANK Plaintiff VS. WILLI AM EDWARDS DEFENDANT This cause coming on to be heard and being North Carolina, and it appear@- heard by the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, ing to the court that in this action which was instituted on June 12, 1950, tor f did not take possession of plaint. claim and delivery proceeding that the pldntif the property, and the matter was not prosecuteded by filing 4 com motion of Lend, Sowers and Avery, the attor- it is therefore upon the ff is allowed to make a nonsuit in G =] Stent Superior courr 1 eI iB i a a EB OR I oe neys for the plaintiff, that the plainti this matter and the plaintiff is nonsuited. This the 17th day of January, 1951. TR ig ek IN THE SUPERIOR COURT - \ FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TER, 1951 295 Monday, January 29, 1951. No. 4959 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Statesville Industrial Bank | Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the Se Plaintiff ; : County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 29th Lamar Munday, W. &. Campbell | : phillips, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, | | | | | Vs. { aoaaeoeoaeaewe = = : } : 1 day of January, 1951, at 10:00 O'clock, A. M. when and where His Honor, F. Donald 4 Defendants I j Spring Term, 1951, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A, j.orris, Solicitor Prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of N é in: This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by his honor, Carl on ? . 7 rict of North Carolina, is 1} present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J.C. tumple, High Sheriff of iB Gg. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and Iredell County, is present and opened Court by order of the Court. he court that the parties to this action have adjusted all it anpearing to t : ; J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Il:edell County, returns into open Court et matters in controversy existing between then. f the followi d and lawf I | the names of the following good an awful men and women to ser a j | s and Avery, attorneys for oe eo are oe It is therefore on motion of Land, Sower the January Term, 1951, First Week, to-wit: and for a Grand Jury to serve for a Wa red, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and it is i the plaintiff, orde ie p ’ six months period ending June 30th, 1951, to-wit: hereby allowed to make & voluntary nonsuit. | Paul B, Lingle P, m. Davis Rome G. Howard Floyd B Clark | This the 18 day of January, 1951. | G. Smith E. W. Reavis James H, Campbell - Re Je wilson Karl T Deaton | oierk or Superior Court kK, G. Sherrill T. C. Doby irs. D. A. Horny W Frank Redmon | ik, mm REA TITS MY nc Mo NE OE ED ?, 4» Brown A. F. Holcomb T. 1. Clodfelter Frank B Alexander | | Jessie Hobbs P, F. Davis lirs Geo W Hanna _ O. B. Frick- Ne J. P, Sloan Mrs Sallie Hedrick urs Inez Shavery Charles Ost | | a N, Sain L. C. Myers R. W. Davis, Jr H. O. Montgomery i a, B, wackey Billie J. Zachery We H. Moore Aster B. Hill i No. 1773 Jon D. Brady Charles et J. E. Walker. frank P, Hildebran | NURTH CatObLina, In the Superior Court, _ munergpen, sppeeres oe.f seat PowPd one “GUES 3 sy ne Lov enhe FASEB ad Re Grand [REDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk. Jury to serve for the six months period ending June 30th, 1951, to-wit: ! | %. li, Reavis T. I. Clodfelter vrs, Sallie Hedrick [In Re: Caveat to Will of { ‘cial 4, 0, Montgomery R. E. Mackey >. 2, Wile | a *harles Ost R. W. Davis, Jr K. G. Sherrill | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the undersigné ‘. H, Moore P. W. Brown Jessie Hobbs Slerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court a oe Don D. Brady J. P. Sloan that the Caveators desire to take a non-suit and withdraw their Caveat: floyd B, Clark Frank Hildebrand P. F. Davis It is, therefore, ordere and adjudged by the Court that this cause w. H. hoore, was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. be and the same is hereby non-suited, and the Caveators are allowed to withirsy William Sprinkle, was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. tne caveat.. . G. N. Sain, James H. Campbell and J. E. Walker were not returned. tc This January 26th, 195 ry 26th, 1951. - C. hyers was deceased. | s+ Se Saeerilor” ourt, sre Billie J. Zachery was out of the County. 1 carolina. County, North © hrs. D., A. Horn and O. B. Frick were excused by the Court ie Beale sic aie aie aie aie o)e ste alc ate ate ate ae ate ake ae ae ae afc aie a aie CIES AE ‘ - ; 7 ‘rs. Inez Shaver was excused by the Statute. “rs Geo W. Hanna was not returned Th $08, ween were sworn as talesman jurors for the Week, tt, Wal lade James Meacham L. R. Cashion Le 0. Wallace W. A. Templeton David D. Wike C. T. Henders Leroy Reavis C, B. Hines he Cy Smith on T. A. Nash L. F,. Warren Me P, uh. M. S. Haynes L. C, Wood Charles Meatae or E. W. Blackweldi No l 412 State vs sharles No. 1360 vtate vs irvin leims No. ] 267 state vs John Hlenry Tomlinson No. 1395 otate vs GC. P. (Soda) Johnson No. 1409 wtate . vs Henry &,. Pegram Bb. Mebelland IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FRIST WEEK --= JANUARY TER. Monday, January 29th, 1954 1 . ™ re _ FIRST WEEK <= 1 Monday, January 29th, 1954 No. 1437 State vs ; Harold i. Roseman otate vs Harold &. lioseman No. 1440 State vs Velma lioose NO« 14,50 State vs ¢, T. (Soda) Johnson No. 145] state vs >, T. (Soda) Johnson No. 1457 State vs Paul Kevere Plyler No. 1463 Jtate vs dussell swaugh NO. 11,67 wtate vs Roy Bumpardner NO. | LO state vs “oy Bumgardner ‘he defendant enters aplea of guilty. NO. 1469 No. 146 VW Upon recommendation of the went is contined for a period of 1 rood behavior upon payment of the is liable, Vv Phativ iol Pros with Leave JRIVE DRUNK The defendant called and failed. and Instanter Capias, LARCENY The defendant call 3 é ed e " and Instanter Capias, and failed Golicitor the praye? , WwIELVE (12) ONTHS dursni cost for which t for vi" oF rs Jtate vs he County f | ‘oy Bumgardner No. 1447 state - vs Silly Hershel Callahan Ww Judgment nisi Sed f8 Judgment Nisd Sof Fa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM, 1951 Vi OLATION oF CITy URVDINANCL Continued by consent VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE Continued by consent ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WhAPON T.e defendant called and failed, Fa and Instanter Capias,. Judginent Nisi o OSSESS LIQUOR The defendant called Fa ard Instanter Capias. Judgment Nisi POSoLoOW LIJUUn Tne defendant called and failed. fa and Instanter Capias. I AST rROY The defendant called Fa and Instanter Capias 1/ : ’ 1 Vesti 4 UUit + sa The defendant called and failed. and Capias. Judgment Nisi sci Fa POSSESS: r stiow ho The defendant called and Capias. Judgment Nisi sci Fa POSSESS PUNCH BOARDS. The defendant called and failed. and Capias. Judgement Nisi ci Fa URIVE DRUNK . The defendant enters a plea of guilty of drivi@runk. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of LIGHT (8) MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the Jtate Highway and l’ublic Works Com- mission, The prison sentence is suspended for a period of THREE (3) YEARS upon the following express conditions: 1. That at this term of the court the defendant pay into the office of the Clerk of Superior Court a fine of $100.00 and the cost of the action. 2, That he be of good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the state, and that he totally abstain from the use of alcoholic beverages of all kinds and descriptions whatsoever for a period of THREE YEARS. 3. That he not operate a motor vehicle upon the ublic highways of North Carolina for a period of TWELVE MO THS. If it be made to oper? to the Court at any time with- in said period that the defendant has violated any of the conditions upon which the prison sent énce is susp- ended, capias and commitment to issue to put the prison sentence into effect when ordered by the court. FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM Monday, January 29th, - No. 14.21 State vs Thomas Austin Gamble W=-56 No. 1423 state vs jJenry Fleming ued7 No. 14,39 state VW [es Yvwe Gee. C Gant C= Ho, 1475 otate vs Marie Bunton licLelland { I { I ~TN THE SUPERIOR COURT RM, 1951 1951 DRIVE DRUNK The defendant enters a plea of guil Upon motion of the defendant ant by eae eo nretde prayer for judgment is continued for a period of wh the YEARS upon the following express conditions: om (2 1, At this term of the court that he pay i office of the Clerk of the Superior Court a hawt and ane sem of the action. he of $10, z: hat he be of gemeral good behavi : any of the lews of the shake: “thet he not eee Viola vehicle upon the puhlic highways of North Carolina for period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and that he totally sh from the use of alcoholi¢ beverages of all kinds” a criptions whatsoever for said period of TWO (2) Yeags If it be made to appear to the Court at any time wth said period that the defendant has violated “wae conditions upon which the prayer for judgment is contin: — is to —— motion of the Solicitor and tie” Court pronounce judgment at any subseq ail TWO (2) Yaar PontoDe 7 Sees ae It is further ordered by the of this judgment be sent to the the State of Georgia under seal Court that a certified op hiotor Vehicles Bureau o- of this court, POSSESS LICUOR Upon motion of the defendant and by his consent, the prayer for judgment is continued for TWO YZARS upon the following conditions: Le That at this term of court the defendant py int the office of the Clerk of Superior Court the cost of tx action. 26 That he be of general good behavior and not viclis any of the laws of the state. 36 That he not have in his possession any taxpaid a non-taxpaid whiskey for said period, either on his persia or on his premises, and totally abstain from the use of % during said period. If it be made to appear to the Court at any time withis said period that the defendant has violated any of the cu ditions upon which the prayer for judgnent is contited, capias to issve upon motion of the Solicitor and judges may be pronounced at any subsequent tern. ‘\ULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant through his attorney, hr. J. Ge Lewis eo a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled,. L.URDER The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body (eigit present) a True Bill of Indictment charging the defentét Marie Bunton McLelland, with the capital offense of lr in words and figures as follows: "STATS OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ANUARY TEA THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PREOLS.s 4! j.arie Bunton MeLelland late of the County of Tredel?, * 7th day of November A. D., 1950, with force and am in the said County, unlawfully, willfully, felonious of his malice aforethought, did kill and mu Thomas MeLelland contrary to the form of the 8 case made and provided, and against the peace the state, Zeb A. Morris, ° "No.1475 STATE VS. Marie Bunton McLellan MURDER Witness x Mir, Hartness, Chief Police ed Those marked x sworn by the undersi srt: foreman, and examined before the Gra and this bill found A TRUE BILL H Foreman of the OF FRIST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM Monday, January 2°th, 1951 No. 1449 State vs. pete Shoemaker We 56 No. 1471 State vs p, F, Baxter No. 1472 State vs Pp, F. Baxter No. 1473 State vs Howard K, Baxter, Jr No. 1455 State vs Julia Ann Pierce No. 1461 State vs Odell Morrison, Jr No. 1471 & 1472 State vs nH r ) re @ e+e 27 Baxter No. 1473 State a uoward K. Baxt Wal? er, dr | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1951 POSSESS LIQUOR The defendant through his attorney, Mr. J. G. Lewis enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled: BREAKING A TRUE ENTERING & LARCENY BILL BREAKING, A TRUE ENTERING & LARCENY BILL AIMDD T YO eT ENTERING & LARCENY BREAKING, BILL A TRUE OPERATING DISORDERLY HUUsE A TRUE BILL BREAKING AND ENTERING A TRUE BILI BREAKING, ENTERING AND LAnCENY The defendant in each case enters a plea of guilty of breaking, and entering and larceny of property of the value of more than 5100.00. The two cases are consolidated for judgment. It appearing to the court that the defendant now has active sentences to serve in the State's Prison which have been heretofore imposed by the Courts of North Caro- lina in the aggregate number of years of approximately Thirty-three (33), it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison at hard labor for not less than FIFTEEN nor more than TWENTY YEARS, THIS sentence to run concurrently with the sentences that he is now serving. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of guilty © breaking and entering and larceny of property of the value of more than $100.00. It appearing to the Court that this case is one of a series of cases which happened in a short length of time and thet the various cases arose out of violation of the law in Gaston and Iredell Counties, and that prior to this term of the Court His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, in the Superior Court of Gaston County, imposed a sentence upon the defend- ant of not less than bighteen nor more than Thirty Months in Prison. i1t further appearing to the Court that the defendant is 17 years of age and that there is a chance of rehabilitation of the defendant after the completion of sentence heretofore imposed by His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink: It is the judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the State's Central Prison at hard labor to wear stripes for not less than THREE nor more than FIVE YEARS, This sentence is suspended for a period of FIVE YEARS after the defendant shall have completed the sen- tence imposed by Judge H. eane Sink in the Superior Court of Gaston County upon the following conditions: le That he be of good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the state. 2, That he work regularly at in so far as it is possible for him to obtain employment. If is is made to = 5 aged to the Court that the defendant has violated any of the conditions upon which this sentence is suspended during the five years after the completion of the sentence imposed in Gaston County, Sapias aml com- mitment to issue to put the prison sentence into effect — when ordered by the Court. some gainful occupation ft ial N THE SUPERIOR COUR FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Monday, January 29th, 1951 No. 1462 LARCENY State The defendant enters a plea of guilty, vs It is judgment of the Court that the defendant p Raymond G. Pendergrass fined in the State's Central Prison at hard lass ee Ne2h stripes for not less than TWO nor more than TRE Yeu No. 1459 ATTE:.PTED RAPE State The defendant through his attorney, lhir, vs a plea of not guilty. liack W. Hager Jury sworn and empanelled: No. 1463 LURDER State The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body (eight vs present) a True Bill of Indictment charging the defendant, Russell \waugh Russell Waugh, with the capital offense of Murder in oe and figures as follows: "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TTY 2Vv ADT wre Wr JANUARY ORDINAL TERA, 1951 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: Th: Russell Waugh late of the County of lredell, on the 24th in the said County, uniawfully, willfully, feloniously, ax of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder one Irene Burchette waugh contrary to the form of the statute in su case made and provided, am against the peace and dignity o the State. Zeb A. Morris solicitor. "No. 1463 STATE VS Russell Waugh INDICTMENT i.URDER witness . Jack Holland W.D. Morrison < Henry Shuford W. Pressley Johnson Charlie Bob King Those marked x sworn by the undersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found A TRUE BILL. We H. Moore Voreman of the cram Jury: : b This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, January 1951 at 9:30 O'clock, CL-"“N > 0) OL ore tie IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM,1951 Tuesday, January 30th, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Tuesday Morning, January 30th, 1951. ¢ No. 1459 ATTEMPTED RAPE State The jury returned a verdict of guilty of Assault on Female. | vs The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be Mack W. Hager confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a We period of SIX |.ONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Com- mision. No. 1457 POSSESS LIQUOR State vs Roy Bumgardner No. 1460 State vs Odell Morrison C-21 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCEN No. 1464 SPEEDING state The defendant enters a plea of guilty as chargea. vs Prayer for judgment continued for TWELVE (12) MONTHS Leona 5. Jhowmar upon good behavior and payment of the cost. W=32 GRAND JURY REPORT e--- JANUARY TER, 1951 Iredell County Superior Court Monday, January 29, 1951 With 18 members present we investigated and passed on all bills lelivered to us by the Solicitor, January 30, with 17 members present, we investigated by Committees the County Home, County Jail and Court House, The state Prison Camp. A committee composed of five members of our jury investigated the Jounty Court House and the County Jail. we found the jail in good order, floors clean, beds clean and the prisoners report the food good. The jail kitchen is in a neat and orderly condition, There were 3 white women prisoners, 13 white male prisoners, 1) colored male prisoners and 3 colored women prisoners. We visited all the offices in the Court House and found them in good order, A committee composed of six members of our jury visited the Prison vamp. We found the Prison Camp to be in good condition, the kitchen was found to be in a sanitary condition as well as the toilets. The beds and clothing. were found to be clean ami in orderly manner, There were 99 long term colored prisoners, es - * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM Tuesday, January 30th, 195 ““SIN THe SUPERIOR COURT 1951 FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 1 Wednesday, January 3lst, 1951 (Grand Jury Report continued) y “ep ‘ ; This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on , committee composed of six members of th 1 p e jury visited the County jednesday Morning, January 3lst, 1951. Home and Farm, The lst floor of the Main Building for white inmates Women's Ward, we find plastering cracked and in need of repair. The screens and wood 4 . ANSLAUGHTER Noe 1432 dudtavO dull Z wh 11, 4 e Lo a ° a | work need painting, the porch floor also needs painting and a wi State (This case is resumed for trial) & 2 window glass in vs _ The jury having been together more than 24 hours and Alton D. Crouch having failed to agree upon a verdict, and having informed the Court that they are of the opinion that they cannot . : m sain . - arre he C : 3ts dis s withdrews a ivr ’ ing the steps need repairing very badly. The 2nd floor in the same building anavk ere ede ai sae a. [es “é il «ct ella AGLO G@ B vy . é e the reception room needs to be replaced, and on the south entrance of this build * . We2kh the plastering needs repairing. ‘The dinming room the ceiling needs repairing . The front porch f eeds repairi T) 10) S > a4 No. 1475 MUD Sit 1 oO porch floor needs repairing. The down sputs need painting on all bui};. creed The defendant in open Court through her Attorneys ings. vs ur. Je Ge Lewis and }.essrs Burke & Surke tenders a plea Marie B. MeLelland of guilty of Iurder in the 2nd Jegree which plea the State We18 accepts. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined The lared « — : ; . j he Central Pris and assigned to SempoOt, .omen's The colored men's ward, the ceiling needs repairing. Tuts a Sig oe pling Recagy coagiggetac f yee n 4 ‘ ic iiw sAlldD 4 a pe : Va 86 a S fhe colored women's ward, we find that the porch floor needs repairing ot a. hin ce a 1 ; - TWENTY =i: IGHT - more tha IRTY YEARS w@ find 45 inmates in the liome at the County Home, © convicts laborers ee a ee oe ! two white and 4 colored. ‘The Home employs one hired colored girl. There are lj No, 1446 FORNICATION AND «DULTRY State The defendant enters a plea of suilty as charged. vs hebane Ww. Cook W=16 wiite male inmates, and 17 white women inmates and 3 colored men inmates and 10 colored women inmates, . herrt)) to ee ee ‘ eX : 7 oP, oherriii tne ouperint ena GPhtes that they need 25 gallons of paint of the vresent needs. No. 1455 OPERATING A DISORDERLY li : State The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. ii : 7 vs Jury sworn amd empanelled and returned a verdict of kespectively submitted, Julia inn Pierce guilty, as charged. 36 - ann te No. 1460 | BASTARDY Foreman of the Grand Jury. state | In the record on appeal no final judgment was entered vs { in the lower court, therefore, the Lower court having Junior Kichard Campbell exclusive original surisdiction to enter final judgment, the cause is remanded to the end that the court may ener final judgment, the court having original jurisdiction. The defendant excepts tothe ruling of the Court and to the order made and gives notice of appeal in open court to the Supreme Court of North Carolina, “to ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON vs | aia oe ak ee, attorney Kir, John R, Mebaughii No. 1395,1450,1451 | DRIVE DRUNK: POSSESS LIQUOR: POSSESS LIQUUH 7 wurieen Holmes Jury sworn and maeiiel’ d 1 erdict of NOT Glu vtate | The defendant enters a plea of guilty to all three cases. = . = ane reveraes Mr vs { In Cases Nos. 1395 and 1450 are consolidated for judg- C. T. (Soda) Johnson ment. = 56 The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- No. 1ih9 055458 LIQUO fined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of State the jury states to the Court that they cannot agree upon é SIX MONTHS to be assigned tOWMeRE. sein the supervision of verdict. the C c's , ae orit the State Highway and Public; ssion. rails ae = oe discretion withdrew * juror am it is sas ardae of the Court that on account of the oor - eee & ee ee present physical condition of the defendant that te shall be kept in jail under the treatment of the County Physician Noe 1474 UBLIC DRUNKNSSS until in the judgnent of the County Physician he is physi- aanse The d eg cally able to be transferred to the State Prison road camp, Te ne defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendre. ssoned and that after he is f ound to be physically able to go to Shirley Johnson e vudement of the Court is that the defendant be impr DAYS. said camp that he shall be forthwith transferred to said W=28 the common jail Of lredell County for a term of THIRTY oe ip camp to be assigned to work under the supervision of the appearing to the Court that the defendant has been confin \ State Highway and Public Works Commission for the remainder ° the defendant to be given credit for the Jail for Twenty-five days awaiti trial,it is ordered by %” . of said time gh oe eaatae for {ns in jail; then when he is transferred from Court that the defendant be given credit on this sentence time he rema said Twenty-Five days, 6s the jail to the prison camp he is to be given only that work in the opinion of the County Physician he is able to do that would not be detrimental to his health. | otate ] The in 4 the defendant throurch W , MeLaughl In No. 1451, it is the judgment of the Court that the vs ough his attorneys Mr. John R defendant $e efafined in she ommon Jail of Iredell County ' . “Pr, Lugene Tri i oe | Jury sworn aaa wapeneitanse of not guilty. for a term of TWELVE MONTHS to be assigned to work under _ Pending trial ; il the supervision of the State Highway Public Works Come “ednesday hertdine ge Be a oeere Aone a recone niasi@a. The prison sentence in this case is suspended for o ¥ ae Faye a period of TWO YEARS after the defendant shall have comp~- This Honorable c sd leted the somonte seeters 2 # ate anh # aa ¥ e vicina Janus ; 4@ VOurt t into effedt then the defendant doe anuary 318t, 1951 at 9:30 O'Clock, takes a recess until Wednesday Morning any ef the follows aepeuscen Continued on back of page vs Pete Jhoemaker w= NO. 1432 i ANOLAUGHTER _ ’ ff ald , Off MITC Pi Llane State vs C. Te. (Soda) Johnson No. 1461 otate vs Udell liorrison, Jr. C22 No. Li \ State vs Odell Morrison No. 1452 State vs John Johnson No. 1453 State | vs | ’ Blanche Pendercrass ssa nen a - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK -- JANUARY TERN,1951 Wednesday, January 3lst, 1951 ame a (Continued from page 303) That he be of general good behavior any of the laws of the State, and quae tas not violate the prohibition law. If it be made to appear to the Court at in said period that the defendant has viola conditions upon which the prison sentence i suspended, Capias and Committment to issue Prison sentence into effect when ordered by Hot violat ly that he d any time with. ted any of tie to put the the Court, AKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of not guilty, Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of Guilty. Not wrrae A TINT BRAKING , ENTERING AND LARCEN The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. aateee sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of Not m1 Ye : . UVie Jontinued ) iy -ontinued aA¥ ,ontinued Used Pontinued FORNICATION AND ADULTRY The defendant peresented to the Court a certificate simi he } n * ’ : n f, that he and Blanche Pendergrass are now married to one anotie It is ordered that the case be Nol Prossed on payment of tt cost. v URN ICATION AND ADULTRY g The defendant presented to the Court a Certificate showilt that he and John Johnson are now married to one another is oes that the case be Nol Prossed on payment the cost. my 1 7 n This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, February 1% 1951 at 9:30 O'Clock, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK == JANUARY TERM,1951 Thursday, February 1st ,1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Thursday Morning, February lst, 1951. No. 1439 State vs George Ce Gant C=22 Nos 1395, 1450,&1451 state vs 0. T. (Soda) Johnson Wo. 1367 | otate ' vs | John Henry Tomlinson No. 1419 State eh Javid Franklin Smith No. 1467 State vs doy Bumgardner No. 1468 State vs toy Bumgardner No. 1469 State vs Roy Bumgardner ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON It appearing to the Court in the altercation the defend- ant has his foot broken and has been severely punished as a result of that, upon motion of the defendant and by his consent, the prayer for judgment is continued for a period of TWO YEARS upon the following conditions: 1. At this term of court he pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court the cost of the action. 2, That he be of general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the state, and that he keep the peace towards hr. J. D. whitaker. if it be made to appear to the Court that at any time within said period that the defendant has violated any of the conditions upon which the prayer for judgment is con- tinued, Capias to issue and the Solicitor for the State is to pray the judgment of the Court at any subsequent term during said two year period. POSSESS LIQUOR The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: L. C. \iallace, R. Cashion, Javid D. Wike, Paul B. Lingle, L. !. warren, C,. Robertson, Leroy Reavis, ©. i. Henderson, L. GO. wood, F. liorrow, Troy Ireland and k. D. \.allace. The jury returned a verdict of ruilty as charged. It is judgment of the Court that the defendant be con- fined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of TWSLVE MONTHS to be assigned to work uncer the supervision of the State Highway and Public orks Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of THREs YEARS upon the following express conditions: 1. That at this term of court the defendant pay into the office of the Clerk of Superior Court the cost of the action. 2, Theat he be of general good behavior and not viol ate any of the laws of the state, and especially that he do not violate the prohibition law. If it be made to appear to the Court any time within said period that the defendant has violated any of the condit- ions upon vhich the prison sentence in this case is suspended, Capias and Commitment to issue to put the prison sentence into effect when ordered by the Court, DRIVE DRUNK: POoSESS LIQUOR: POSSESS LIQUOR It is ordered by the court that the order of Sci Fa Bond heretofore entered be stricken out on payment of cost of Sci Fa. BU RGLARY It is ordered by the Court that the order of Sci Fa Bond heretofare entered be stricken out on payment of cost of Sci Fa. RECKLESS DRIVING Continued for the POSSESS LIQUOR Continued for the Defendant TOSSESS FIREWORKS Continued for the Defendant POSSESS PUNCH BOARDS Continued for the Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT — ~ JN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 FIRST WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Thursday, February lst, 1951 Friday, February 2nd, 1954 ‘Noe 1412 RAPE j State The Solicitor states that he is not asking for a verd vs on the Capital Crime of Rape, but for a verdict of in Willie Lee Goss on female with intent to commit rape, Sault Friday Morning, February 2nd, 1951. g During the trial the defendant through his counsel ¢ a plea of guilty of Assault With Deadly Weapon, which a the State accepts. piea It is judgment of the Court that the defendant be con ‘ iat fined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a 7 No. 1321 RAPE SIX LONTHS to be assigned to work under the eugene or state ___The jury returned a verdict of guilty of Assault on the state Highway eo — Commission, By and with vs a cers Mige-:¢ hd Alma rape. Each juror recommends oe eats ak teas tae +S ordered that the rn ene S The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con senten . = - = z sar . : . in ne Com ion jail of 4 dad 2 - = : a 7 p 2 = a a ” ‘ at a : Iredell vounty under the supervision of the jailer and Boay ine _in the as ventral Prison at hard labor and to of commissioners of Iredell County. . wear eer ee or not less than TO and ONS-HALF nor more tnan FIVE HARD e This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on f No. 1321 State The Solicitor states that he is not asking for a verdict le, 1324 vs the Capital Crime of Rape, but for a verdict of an assay: state Flake liullis on female with intent to commit rape. ; vs : =39 The defendant through his counsel, I.r. J. G. Lewis and Flake l.ullis lr. Re Ae Hedrick enters a plea of not suilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: ue it, Cashion, Dari . D. .ike, Paul B. Lingle, sarl T. Deaton, 5. %, Robertsm, Entries of Appeal Upon the coming in of the verdict the defendant moves to set the verdict aside and for a new trial for errors committed by the Court. Motion overruled. Defendant excepts. Upon the pronouncement of judgment the defend- ant excepts and for errors assigned and to be assigned in open court gives notice of appeal to the supreme Court. tharles Austin, C. T. Henderson, L. C. wiood, 1. Fe Morray Further notice waived. Appeal bond in the sum of 3100.00 Rome G. Yorward 3. Haynes and Charlie leadows ' adjudged sufficient. Appearance bond fixed in the sum of : : . 2500.00 to be justified am approved by the Clerk. No. 1253 SCI FA ON BOND ae consent of the State and the defendant, the defendant otate Judgment of the Court is that the judgment on the Bond = oc. we or. a ee cc > rn } r + l . sak alu a A a aa I 1 Y Te es ia and the same is hereby made final. it is ordered by and the Solicitor allowed 20 days thereafter to serve counter- . S. White, Principal the Court that execution issue on said Surety within tea nae: a &. L. Lewis, Surety days from the adjournment of this court. ; case or file exceptions. 71 h2 ) it en tT T wTIT mnanomn 106 Ley WUNe@ OUP: Uitte e mH} Aafanda » hh ep} 3 att . a Rawt otate The defendant through .is attorney, --r. vaxter vs enters a plea of not guilty. NO. 1502 } SCI FA ON BOND State i Judgement of the Court is that the judgment on the Bond vs | be and the same is hereby made final. Tt is ordered by oe fe ; <a ¥ 4 aS ee Samual A. Reavis,Principal the Court that execution issue on said Surety within — Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: , 1. B. Hill, T. ©. Doby, L. i. warren, » Security Bonding Co.Inc. ten days from the adjournment of this court. 18 aes fy nal ) Surety Hine, Ww. A. Templeton, T. a. sash, +. Y Meacham and =. Wi. Blackwelder. The jury stated that they were unable to agree upon verdict, the Court in its discretion withdraws a juror and orders 2 mistrial and orders 2 new trial. ~ ae ges No 1k70 “IVT I, : IQWTVITNWS sve mei MoAb VALVlis State Nol Pros with Leave vs. Lewis 1m. Allison No. Lh41 FORNIC i ND ADULTRY otate Nol ith Leave vs Albert L, TE Fee tee NO« 14,2 ABETTING State I With Leave _ V8 Albert L, State vs Julia Ann Pierce No. 1443 FORNICATION AND ADULTRY ] on Jol Pros With Leave Thia H r ak ay ' This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, Febrwry 1951 at 9:30 OtClock. " Lats, AIDING AND ABETTING r = Nol Pros With Leave Julia Ann Pierce No, 1 State’? ear LIQUOR vs ol Pros With Leave Julia Ann Pierce No. 1454 State vs Albert Lee Cook No. 1456 otate vs Julia Ann Pierce Now 2455 State vs Julia Ann Pierce ata ~VAvLe vs John rrice sherril No. 1394 State vs Frank N No. 1430 Staté vs Rural L Shoemaker This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, 1951 at 10:00 O'Clock, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK e- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Friday, February 2nd,1951 FORNICATION AND ADULTRY The defendant through his Attorneys, Mr, Messrs. Burke & Durke enters a plea of guilty as ¢} Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be ane in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of ETGHTSy , HS to be assigned to work under the supervis , State Highway and Public Works Gomieston.” ion of the FORNICATION AND ADULTRY The defendant through her Attorneys, lr. J. G, lessrs. Burke & Burke enters a plea oe euitin pe daa Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined ; the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR Molinas to work in and around the jail under the supervision of the’ High Sheriff and jailer. ” )PERATING A DISORDERLY HOUSE Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined i the State's Prison and assigned to Camp 404, Women's Division at the Prison Camp, for a period of Two Yoans. This judgrent is suspended for a period of TWO YLARxS after the sentence inn in No. 1156 upon the following conditions: a Le That she shall be of general good behavior and not riolate any of the laws of the state and that she shall look after and care for as best she can her minor children, 2. That she shall at all times, in this state or out of this state, in this County or out of this County, never be found in the presence of Albert Lee Cook unless she is law fully merried to him. If it be made to appear to the Court, «at any time within said period that the defendant has violated any of the condit ions upon which the prison sentence in this case is suspendei Japi Ss and vomaitment to issue to put the prison sentence ix: effect when ordered by the Court. —wTh ‘> \ djhurduadidvwi Lav ADULTRY That prayer for judgment be contin YEARS and the defendant is here iod upon the conditions se ued for @ period of by placed on probetics t forth in the aderc conditions of probation ordered by the Sout shall: Be at home and off the streets 0 Otclock: Not to operate qa motor vehite VE LON mr 4 siVivillive rm Aa had Sontinued RIVE UJRUNK Sont inued RIVe nome 45 UiUNkK Continued February 5th JUDGE PRESIDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e----- JANUARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th,1951 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Monday Morning, February 5th, 1951, at 10:00 Y'clock, with Honorable F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, 1951, present and presiding. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the Second Week of the January Term, 1951, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: J. D. Padgett C. O. Hadley W. Ross Mills- L. V. Cartner Mrs, Elizabeth N. Gray H. B. Sherrill Eugene Baker David J. Rinehart John B. Simpson Mrs. E. F. Nesbit Earl M. Knox- L.'W. Westmoreland J. H. Lafoy J. O. Hunter Alex Ross C. B. Caskey C. W. Murdock Foy Lee Templton Chas. C. Lynn F. Searr Morrison,Sr J. T. Jennings. T. C. Drum Fred J. Hoke J. Weber Jordan~ J. T. Jennings was excused on Doctor's Certificate we Ross Mills was excused by the Court Earl M. Knox was not returned J. Weber Jordan was out of the County. The following men and women constitute what shall hereafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: J. D. Padgett, David J. Rinehart, John B. Simpson, J. H. Lafoy, C. W. Murdock, C. 0. Hadley, Mrs. Elizabeth N. Gray, Mrs. E. F. Nesbit, J. 0. Hunter, Foy Lee Templeton, T. C. Drum, H. B. Sherrill, a2 Q Iter af a page Sav L058 LiZt wee bott No. 4949 sman jurors) Rosa Mae Alexander | DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury /1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Vanderbilt Alexander IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA JANUARY 1951 TERM IREDELL COUNTY Rosa Mae Alexander Vs. LSSUES Vanderbilt Alexander Were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the Com- plaint? Answer Yes 2. Have the Plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR court? SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Monday, February 5th,1951 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY 1951 TERM Rosa Mae Alexander Vs. Vanderbilt Alexander Carolina, on the Sth day of February, 1951, This action having been called for trial, and having been tried by the Court and a jury, and the Jury having answered the following issues "YES" 1, Were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the Complaint? 2, the plaintiff and the defendant lived Separate and apart from each other for more than two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? 3. Has the Plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for more than six months next preceed- ing the commencement of this action? 4nd it appearing to the Satisfaction of the Court that the defendant he been legally served with process and that the plaintiff is entitled to an absolute divorce from the defendant from the bonds of matrimony. it is now on motion of C. P, Barringer, Counsel for the plaintiff, order and ad judged, that she be, and is, hereby divorced from the defendant from the bonis of Matrimony, and that the said bonds of matrimony are hereby dissolved to the sant effect as if they had never been married, and that the cost of this action be tated against the defendant, but paid from the deposit made by the plaintif? for this F. Donald Phillips JUDGE PRESIDING purpose, ihe following were cworn as talesman ‘uy; vlarerce todgers ite OC. Black , ~e “Se V&a?PrSOn vam Vernon " ‘eo Se “NOOdruff orl Adams Fred Coley — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM ,1951 Monday, February 5th,1951 No. 4961 I Hunter leone us DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled Vs. answeres the issues Submitted to it as follows: Howard Hunter IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH JANUARY TERM, 1952 IREDELL COUNTY Leona Hunter Vs. Howard Hunter a Vid the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2 Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina fhe for more than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes. 36 Did the defendant Separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the vouplaint? Answer, Yes, NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT IREDELL CuuN‘ty January Te rm, 1951 Leona Hunter i Vs. j Howard Hunter 1 This cause Coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Term, 1951, Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, F. Donald Philips, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; it is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of tatrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, This the 5th day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips JUDGE PRESIDING FER He HC Ie a eS Teri Re Rea eae ole ales eae se see atest ae ' JN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th, 19$1 No. 4966 Audrey Speaks Moss | DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1", being duly swo answers the issues submitted to na Pol long upanelle Vs. | David Alexander Moss IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA JANUARY TERM, 1951 IREDELL CUUNTY Audrey Speaks Moss | t David Alexander Moss 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer, Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes. 3. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they live separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint’ Answer. Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1951 Audrey Speaks Moss | Vs. | JUDGNENT David Alexander moss | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Tera, 1951 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, F. Donald Phillips, dude Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears 1 the record; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and tit same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divert from the defendant, This the 5th day of February, 1951. F. Donald Phillips ———— ° i 3c Se aie sie vic 2 Bis aie die Bie ah ate te atc aie at le of a ‘ ‘ NS ARE BE IE DE HE 3 D6 ie BK A Be a ae aie aie ake ae ak oc ae alc se a afc ak ole ale ale men ae ae aie aie eae 3k 26 aK A IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e%e--- JANDARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th,1951 No. 4982 - Burns pobert F DIVURCE Vs. The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Madge M. Burns IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CARULINA BEFURE THE CLERK IREDELL COUNTY Robert F. Burns Vs. Madge M. Burns 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant intermarried as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes 26 Has the plaintiff lived in the State of North Carolina for one year immediately preceeding the institution of this action? Answer. Yes. 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years imediately prior to the institution of this action? Answer. Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Robert F. Burns | Vs. j JUDGHENT wadge M, Burns | This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Presiding ° Judge, at the January Term, 1951 of Iredell County Superior Court, and the issues which appear in the record having been submitted to and answered by a Jury in favor of the plaintiff. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are hereby dissolved. It is ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, F, Donald Phillips Presiding Judge He se see ak sea ae a ae ak ae ae a ake I aie aI I CA SIE RC I HE a EE HE | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND ‘WEEK <== JANUARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th, 1951 No. 4969 Ma K. Pickens v DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn a answers the issues submitted to it as folloe elle Herbert Pickens NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM, 1951 Mary K. Pickens Vs. Herbert Pickens ls Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answers Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1951 Mary K, Pickens | Vs, q Herbert Pickens | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Tern, 1%, Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, F. Donald Phillips, Judge Pres iding and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it i the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; & it appearing to the Court that there were born of the marriage of the plaintiff ané the defendant five children, one of whom is a minor and fourteen years of 46¢ nase william Monroe Pickens, and the plaintiff herein hs the care and custody of said chs and it further appearing to the Court and the Court finds as a fact that the defe ant, Herbert Pickens was served with summons and a copy of the Complaint in the abort entitled action wherein the plaintiff, Mary K. Pickens, asked the Court for the cue tody and control of the minor child, William Monroe Pickens, and the Court finds pert a fact that the defendant, Herbert Pickens did not appear in Court and defend the ™ Mary 5 he minor entitled cause of action, and the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff, Pickens, is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of t child, William Monroe Pickens; and the Court further finds as fact that the bet interest of said minor would be served by being in the custody of his Mother. ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Monday, February 5th, 1951 The Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff, Mary K. Pickens, is a fit and suitable person for the custody of said minor, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. After a full and complete investigation by the Court as to the fitness of the plaintiff, Mary K. Pickens to have the custody and control of William honroe Pickens, the minor child awarded to the plaintiff, the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff is asking for absolute custody of the said minor, and that the defendant had notice thereof from the Complaint having been served upon him and the Court further finds as a fact, after a fully and complete investigation that the plaintiff, Mary K. Pickens is a fit and suitable person to have the permanent custody of the said minor, and the full and complete permanent custody of the said minor is hereby awarded to the plaint~- iff, “ary Kk, Pickens. This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, is retained for further orders. This the 5th day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips “Judge Presiding hese ste se ae ae aa ae Re a ai aK a eR a Re a a a 8 RE ERE No. 4978 Senora Cannon Payton Taylor | | DIVORCE | VS. { The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to Abner G, Taylor it as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, NORTH CAROLINA. L Y JANUARY TERM, 1951. IRSDELL COUNTY. Senora Cannon Payton Taylor Vs. ISSUES Abner G, Taylor l. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived Separate and apart from each other, for more than two years prior to the instit- ution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, ree ee Pe nee ee "IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, February 5th ,1951 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERLOR CUURT, IREDELL CUUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Senora Cannon Payton Taylor Vs. Abner G, Taylor This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, F, Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Senora Cannon Payton Taylor, and the defendant, Abner &, Taylor, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. ir Donald Phillips S PRO NO. 4979 william srancis Summers DIVORCE : Vs. The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanellet answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Joyce Alexander Summers NOXTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL CUUNTY. William Francis Summers Vs. Joyce Alexander Sum..ers 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry and are they now husbett and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, Ze Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they live separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institut? of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Yes jorth 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the state of Nort 4 $ Carolina for more than six months prior to the institution of this action, 4 alleged in the complaint? Answer; Yes, ICIS CSI SSI RaSIOISOI OI RI RI a a ae aesioke ie ak ai k ai tea ia a 20k ae a d contis# ” IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -= JANUARY TERM, 1951 Monday, February 5th, 1954 NORTH CAROLINA, se i lintels snes IREDELL COUNTY. jilliam Francis Vs. Joyce Alexander Summers This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the juperior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina before his Honor, F. Vonald Phillips, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by theCourt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, 4g set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, William Francis Summers, and Joyce Alexander Summers, the defendant, by and the same are hereby disolved and set aside and declared null and void and of no effect, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. F. Donald Phillips Judge Presiding No. 4982 sugene C, Lamb DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Betty P. Lamb & Baxter Finch Guardian Ad Litem NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY Eugene C, Lamb Vs. Aer ‘2 & Baxter » Suardian Ad Litem 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, ami have they lived Continuously Separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior ‘o the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North C *rolina for more than six wonths prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Monday, Febfuary 5th, 195 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Bugene C,. Lamb, Vs. Betty P. Lamb & Baxter Finch, Yuardian Ad Litem This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of lredell County, North Carolina before His Honor, F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding, am a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Vourt in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Eugene C. Lamb, and the def- endant, Betty P. Lamb, be and the same are hereby disolved and set aside and decliri null and void and of no effect, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. F, Donald Phillips Judge Presiding Whe 2. ae She aoe aie a ak af aca ae a ak 2 ae a ae a a ae a a a a a a a a a eae 3 No * 4983 .erle Inez White DIVORCE Vs. The Vivorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Grace V. White NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANU ARY TERM + 195 L Merle Inez White Vs. Grace V,. White 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the comple! Answer: Yes, 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate as alleged in the cor plaint and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in this action? Answer: Yes h Carolina action? 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of Nort for six months immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in this Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th, 1951 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1951 yerle Inez White | Vs. i Grace V. White | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before dis Honor, F. Donald Phillips, Judge presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the record: It is therefore, ord-ced and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the def- endant. It is further ordered and adjudged that the cost of this action be taxed by the Clerk of this Court as provided for by the Statutes of North Carolina. F, Donald Phillips JUDGE PRESIDING sii FOI} OI i hol ek Ogg ROI IOI yok foe Ie BCR ai ea NCE ai RO A Rea 2K Ca 3 2/2 Ho. 953 DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: hrs. Inez Bost Smith | Vs. Roy Lee Smith NORTH CAROLINA ~— IN HE SUPERTOR COURT IREDELL CUUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Mrs. Inez Bost Smith | Vs. Roy Lee Smith | 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant uwurrsed, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes 2. Did the defendant unlawfully abandon the plaintiff, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Monday, February 5th, 1954 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. Mrs. Inez Bost Smith Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Roy Lee Smith Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor ’ F, Jonald Phillips, Judge Presiding and a jury at the January Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County; and the following issues having been submitted to and au.swered by the jury: l. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complain’ Answer: "Yes," 26 Vid the defendant unlawfully abandon the plaintiff, as alleged in tis Complaint? Answer: "Tes". 36 Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: "Yes", Now therefore it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Mrs. Inez Bost Smith be and she is hereby, granted a divorce from bed and board from the defendant, Roy Lee Smith, And it is further ordered that the defendant shall until the further order of this court pay to the plaintiff as alimony the sum of One Hundred Fourtett Dollars on or before the 10th day of each calendar month, beginning with the montt of February, 1951; but this sum is hereby reduced to the sum of Forty Dollars resent montt)] ); but ($40.00) per month so long as the plaintiff continues to receive her P allotment from the United States Government of Seventy Four Dollars ( $74.00 should the said United States Government allotment, for any reason, cease bells paid to the plaintiff, then the defendant shall cause to be paid to the plaintifl One Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($114.00) per month, in the manner and form, hereit above set out; and it is further ordered that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for her counsel fees. And it further appearing to the court and the court finding 4° a fact as been living that there is one minor child of said marriage, Alice Faye who h of it furtie with her mother, the plaintiff, since the separation of her parents; & appearing to the Court and the court finding as a fact that the plaintiff and thet and suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor child, ’ r ga! the best interest of said child would be served by being in the custody a” mother: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK <== JANUARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th, 1951 It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be, and she is hereby, granted full and complete custody and control of said minor child until the further order of this court. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff recover of the def- endant the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk. This the 5 day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips Judge Presiding “leat aj ak acai 3k a aK Ne aORC ARC aK a NCAR IRC CCI CNC a aK 3K NO. 4968 Lora Belle R. Bumgardner | DIVURCE The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Vs. | Stanley E. Bumgardner IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, NORTH CAROLINA ; JANUARY TERM, 1951 IREDELL COUNTY. Lora Belle R. Bumgardner | Vs. Stanley E. Bumgardner i l. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, and have they lived separate and apart from each other continuously for more than two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months imnediately prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. SECOND WEEK -=- JANUARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th, 1941 IN THE SUPERIOR count, JANUARY TERM, 1951, NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Lora Belle R. Bumgarner, | Vs. ' JUDGMENT Stanley E, Bumgarner ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, F, Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Lora Belle R., Bumgarner, an the defendant, Stanley E, Bumgarner, be and the same disolved and rendered null and void, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, F, Donald Phillips Judge Presiding, No. 4315 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY. January Term, 1951. John Mathis Vs. Christine W. Mathis This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior vourt before the undersigned, Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaints was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be mr suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 5th day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips ___-—" Judge Presiding FEO IOIOCI ROI i gO Ra a teak aie sea ea ak se ake aa aie ok ak ae 2k aka fea IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -~- JANUARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th,1951 No. 4316 yoRTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, JANUARY TERM, 1951 Sam Martin Vs. JUDGMENT Pauline H. Martin This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 5th day of February, 1951. F. Donald Phillips Judge Presiding Me nhc ae Be ae ee BCBS Bk 25 a BIE BIR BK BK ME IK BE BIC AE DC SIS BIC IE DIC IE TEI AE 2 25 2S NO. 4364 NORTH CAROLINA, THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Lena Leazer { Vs. | Joe Leazer | This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neg- lected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. F. Donald Phillips Judge Presiding This the 5th day of February, 1951. Seemneentie ee “IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Monday, February 5th, 1951 No. 4515 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Frankie Sue Hilderbrand Vs. Marvin Wesley Hilderbrand This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superio, Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the plain was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be no. suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, This the 5th day of February, 195l. F, Donald Fhillips Judge Presiding He ste she te she ate hk ste ate ate ake aie ac ais ale ais ais ax six afc ays ais ais ic No. 4599 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Reba C. Cook Vs. { Thomas Cook | This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superio’ Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintit was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action te, and . same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintifflis taxed with the costs. F, D d Phillips ge Presiding MERRIER I BE RE BK aE a ae a a ae ae ae ae ae Be a a 2c 2c ae a a ae ai a a ae Me ae 2 IRAE \ ri SUPER kh Oh SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Monday, February 5th, 1951 No. 4650 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Nellie Wilson Thomas Vs. Randolph Thomas This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, edjudged and decreed that this action te, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 5th day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips Judge Presiding Be ae Se ae ac a ae aa RE aC a Ra ER CR Ca a a aR AIC RAIA a HIS A A A No. 4744 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Odella Walker Vs. Ernest Walker This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 5th day of February, 1951. F, Do d i udge Presiding He se se ete see see see Me te te te me eae ate Re A RO He Ae a He HE AE YH SUPENIOn COU: < SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM,1951 Monday, February 5th,1951 No. 4769 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Eloise Sharpe James | Vs. | JUDGNENT Robert Lee James j This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the Plain. iff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to apper and prosecute this action: t is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, ani the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs, This the 5th day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips Judge Presiding lc als Be ais ae alc mc ale afeais ae ais a} AK ays BK DIK BS BK 35 DIK BI BIC Dix BI 34 Ik ai Ae Bs Bde 3c Ik a No. 4833 > Tt OA , 7. WURLR UadULlivna IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERs, 1951 irs. Eula B. Parker, Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Je De Padgett, David J. Rinehart, John B, Simpson, oe Vs. Murdock, Foy Lee Templeton, C. T. eater eebed’ Fred J. Hoke, L. V. Cartner, C. gaskey 1 Allen Edminston vente. aha H°SS!snetr Plaintiff Defendant | l. as the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, 48 alkged in the Complaint? ANSWER: Yes 2. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? ANSWER: Five Hundred ($500.00) (The above verdict by the_jury was returned on Tuesday, February 6, 195) This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, February il at 9:30 O'clock. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ew--- JANUARY TERM,1951 Tuesday, February 6th, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, February 6th, 1951. No. 4919 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1951 Paul R. Ervin, Administrator of Marion Lipe, deceased, Plaintiff, Vs. Cannon Mills, a Corporation, and Fred Allen, Defendants Jury sworn and empanelled to try the issues in this case as follows: J. D. Padgett, David J, Rinehart, John 3. Simpson, ©. W. Murdock, Foy Lee Templeton, C. T. Drum, Chas. ©. Lynn, Fred J. Hoke, L. V. Cartner, C. B. Caskey, Alex Ross and L. W. Westmoreland. Pending trial the Court recessed until Wednesday Morning. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, February 7th, 1951 at 9:30 O'clock. Se en marearres . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 3 SECOND WEEK -<-JANUARY TERM,1951 Wednesday, February 7th,1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, February 7th, 1951. No. 4319 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1951 Paul R. Ervin, Administrator of Marion Lipe, deceased, Plaintiff, Vs. Cannon Mills, a Corporation, and Fred Allen, Defendants 1. Was plaintiff's intestate injured ami killed by the negligence of the defendants, as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER Yes 26 Did the plaintiff's intestate by his own negligence contribute to and death, as alleged. in the Answer? ANSWER No 3- What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants for the wrongful death of plaintiff's intestate? ANSWER 310,000. (Ten Thousand Dollars) 4. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover by reaso of the pain and suffering and medical expense incurred by intestate prior to death, ANSWER $1,500, (Fifteen Hundred Dollars) t Qn f nt No. 4710- C. B, Myers & wife vs. D. 0, Cowan, Jr. et al, Continued by ¢* No. 4711- C. B. Myers & wife vs. W. B. Crowson & wife, et al,-- Continued by cm" IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --=- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Wednesday, February 7th, 1951 No. 4722 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM, 1951 Dr. J. S. Meredith Vs. James Atkins & wife Mrs, James Atkins Jury sworn and empanelled to try the issues in this case as follows; ¢. 0. Hadley, Mrs, Elizabeth N. Gray, hr. &. F. Nesbit, Jd. O. Hunter, Earl Adams, F. Scarr Morrison, J. F. Lafoy, W. J. Parks, H. B. Sherrill, “ugene Baker, Robert C. Black and E. &. Woodruff This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, February 8th, 1951 at 9:30 O'Clock. JUDGE PRESIDING — A VERMIN EE AEMB I PMP ABE SME OSE ERA A NN RRR IN THE SUPERIOR COUR SECOND WEEK ---JANUARY TERM,1951 Wednesday, February 7th,1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, February 7th, 1951. No. 4919 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1951 Paul R. Ervin, Administrator of Marion Lipe, deceased, Plaintiff, Vs. Cannon Mills, a Corporation, and Fred +lien, Defendants 1. Was plaintiff's intestate injured ami killed by the negligence of the defendants, as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER Yes 26 Jid the plaintiff's intestate by his own negligence contribute t his injury and death, as alleged. in the Answer? What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants for the wrongful death of plaintiff's intestate? ANSWER $10,000. (Ten Thousand Dollars) 4. what damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover by reaso of the pain and suffering and medical expense incurred by intestate prior to death, ANSWER $1,500. (Fifteen Hundred Dollars) I 0 t , est No. 4710- C, B, Myers & wife vs. D. 0, Cowan, Jr. et al, Continued by cm No. 471l~ C. B. Myers & wife vs. W. B. Crowson & wife, et al,-=- Continued by ea IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «== JANUARY TERM, 1951 Wednesday, February 7th, 1951 No. 4722 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM, 1951 Dr. Je Se Meredith Vs. James Atkins & wife Mrs, James Atkins Jury sworn and empanelled to try the issues in this case as follows; ¢, 0. Hadley, Mrs. Elizabeth N. Gray, hr. E. F. Nesbit, J. 0. Hunter, “arl Adams, F, Scarr Morrison, Jd. F. Lafoy, W. J. Parks, H. B. Sherrill, “ugene Baker, Robert C. Black and E. i. woodruff This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, February 8th, 1951 at 9:30 O'Clock. )RLb pa \ D7 JUDGE PRESIDING tN THE SUPERIUA OUR SECOND WEEK «-.{ JANUARY TERM, 195 Thursday, February 8th, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Thursday Morning, February 8th, 1951. No. 4819 NORTH CARULINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1951 Paul R. Ervin, Administrator of Marion Lipe, deceased, Plaintiff, Vs. Cannon mills Company and Fred Allen, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard am being heard before his Honor, Judge F. Donald Phillips, judge presiding this January-February Term of Civil Court and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant and awarding the plaintiff the sum of $11,500.00 for damages due to wrongful death and pain and suffering. Now, therefore, upon a motion of J. Spencer Bell and Burke & Burke ani G. T. Carswell, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants jointly and severally the sum of $11,500.00 together witi the cost of this action to be taxed by the clerk. This the 6 day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips Judge Presiding (See below for Appeal Entries) ae aicote aie se she ake she 3 ste sic Re ic bie ole sc ok we sie ple Sie alc tte she she cle He ic vic vic te te Pe te he He te te ie He le ve oic ok BER DYE AE AIS BYE DIK DI BK oc aC Bs ale afc ale aie ake sical ate ale ais akc atc sic akc ic ake ake ake akc ofc ake a! He EHS 21S IE NORTH CARULINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1951 Paul R. Ervin, Administrator of Marion Lipe, deceased, Plaintiff, Cannon Mills, a Corporation, and Fred Allen, Defendants | ! Vs. | ' | On the coming in of the verdict the Defendants move to set the sam ed aside for anew trial, Motion overruled and defendants except. Judgment we a8 appears in the record and the defendants again except en appeal to the “— yen in open ged to be Court for errors assigned and to be assigned. Notice of appeal gi Court; further notice waived, Appeal bond in the sum of $150.00 ad jud N TT; STIp r YR QUR SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Thursday, February 8th, 1951 sufficient. By consent, defendants are allowed 15 days within which to make up and serve case on appeal, and plaintiff allowed 15 days thereafter within which to serve counter case or file exceptions. This 8 day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips dudge Presiding. He HE NE ENE TE BAECS AERC A I AC 2 ARE AR 2 No. 4679 NORTH CAROLLNA IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL CUUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1951 A, Rochlin { Vs. ! P, S. West Construction | Company I The plaintiff, A. Rochlin, first being duly sworn, testified: A. ROCHLIN DIRECT EXAMINATION BY mir. SOWERS Q Did you see mr. P. S. West on or about the 20th day of June, 1940? “ae A. Yes Q. Where did you see him? A. He came to our office. mrs. Carlisle was present. Ge Did you at that time have a conversation with mr. West? Yes. What was the conversation? Defendant objects; Over-ruled; exception It was about erecting a house. th W 9? Was this conversation about the purchase of a lot by hr. West? No. He said he would erect a house. Tell the Court and jury what he said to you at that time, in that conversation? A. He said he would erect a house in this neighborhood, I didn't know exactly upon what site. Q. Tell the Court and jury what he said. A, He said he would erect a house, and if I liked it I would take it and if I didN’t like it I would not take it, and I asked him what the price would be, and he said it would be between $10,000.00 and $11,000.00. Nothing was said about ten percent profit. ‘IN THE SUPERIOR COURT — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «== JANUARY TERM.1951 SECOND WEEK ---- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Thursday, February 8th, 1954 Thursday, February 8th, 1953 Objection by defendants sustained; motion to strike allowed: Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed ’ The court holding that the purported contract is for the purch that plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of $150.00 and the ase and sale of real estate, and since the same is not in writing, cost of this action as the same are taxed by the clerk, the contract js inadmissable and the evidence is inadmissable, and the objection is Sustained This 8 day of February, 1951. ned, Plaintiff excepts, F. Donald Phillips F. Donald Phillips, To the ruling of the Court and the intimation of the Cowt, the Judge Presiding ’ plaintiff excepts, and is permitted to take a voluntary non suit, Gonsented to: “he plaintiff withdraws this witness, and take a voluntary non suit Land, Sowers & Avery at this time, and appeals to the Supreme Court. py Neil S. Sowers Ittorneys for the Plaintirt The plaintiff in open court gives notice of a : g eal to . . PP the Supreme R, A, Collier sourt. Notice of appeal given in open court and further notice waived, Kttorneys for t a “y consent the plaintiff is allowed thirty days in which to make up and serve case on appeal to the Supreme Court, and the defendants are allowed er Jawe h 7 male twenty days thereafter to make up and serve countercase or file exceptions , Appeal bond fixed in the sum of 375.00 and the same is adjudged to be mM. 494 sufficient. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT F, Donald Phillips IREDELL CUUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1951 UDGE PRESIDING. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co. | Vs. j G, F, Barnes, T/A ' Barnes Lumber Co, J } No. 4722 This cause coming on to be heard at this January-February term of Donald Phillips, NORTH CAROLINA au 7 : IN TH SUPERIOR CUURT LiZDELL COUNTY the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, F. Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties plaintiff and UT ws we Meredith defendant have agreed on a compromise in settlement of all matters arising on Plaintiff : the pleadings, under the terms of which compromise settlement the plaintiff Vs. - J } ENT is to have amd recover judgment against the defendant, in the sum of $3126.17 James {Atkins and wife, UDGMENT and the costs of the action; irs. James Atkins IT IS, THEREFORE, ON MOTION, by consent, considered, ordered and JVefend: _ adjudged that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $3126.17 and the costs of the action, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Tais cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, It is further ordered, by consent, that no excution shall issue for Ps D C c onald Phillips, Judge presiding at the January Term of the Superior Court of I ’ : s the ; ty days from this date. redell County; and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel collection of the said judgment for ninety y for both the plaintiff and defendants that all matters of controversy set out This the 8th day of February, 1991. in th F, Donald Phil s © pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendants JUDGE SRESTOING have | : agreed to pay to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff has agreed to accep 5Y CONSENT: the sum of $ of 450.00 and the cost of this action in full accord and satisfactios Hutton-Bourbonnais by F. L. Early, V P thereof, G, C ttorney or F tS Por Defendant He eee se ee ae i a see see ee Re me a Mea ae a Me Me ae a Ae He a a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM 1951 Thursday, February 8th, 1951 ; No. 4938 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL CUUNTY. Robert Leonard Brown, Minor 3y and Through his Next Friend, Hugh G. mitchell, Vs. JUDGMENT Grady Dorton and Dr. G. R. Vowles This cause being regularly calendared for trial for February, 1951 regular term of the Superior Court of Iredell County and upon being called for trial by the undersigned Judge presiding; and it being made to appear to the court that the parties hereto have agreed to settle, compromise and adjust all matters and things in controversity herein by the payment by the defendant, Grady Vorton to the plaintiff of the sum of Six Hundred and Fifty Dollars and the payment by the defendant, G. R. Vowles to the plaintiff of the sum of Six Hundred and Fifty Dollars; and the court after making due inquiry as to the manner in which the cause of action arose and the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff and the court being of the opinion that the liabilities of the defendant, Grady Dorton is clear, but that the liability of the defendant, Dr. G. R. Vowles is question-able; and the court being of the opinion and finding as a fact that sdf Settlement is to the best interest to the minor plaintiff and that the sum of Thirtes Hundred Dollars constitutes the fair and just compensation for the injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, Grady Dorton the sum of Six Hundred and Fifty Dolla together with one-half the costs in full final and complete satisfaction and dis- charge of all matters and things in controversy herein as to the defendat Grady Dorton, It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, Dr. G. R. Vowles the sum of Six Hundred and Fifty Dollars togetitr with one-half the costs in full final and complete satisfaction and discharge of all matters in controversy herein as to the defendant, Dr. G. R. Vowles. F, Donald Phillips Grant Bolmer salant, ore 1 ttorney for Velie ant, Dorton Smathers & Carpenter R. Hoyle Smathers ant, re Attorney for Defendant, G. Re Vowles This the %th day of February, 1951. We Consent: R, A, Hedrick Kttorney for Plaintilto — Je GS, Lewis ttorney for aint BE AERC IE a he ae ake ale sii od TEAR HEHE BE Me He SNe Meee Hee Bee ee ee ee ae ea eae ae se ae ae ae eae aah ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Thursday, February 6th, 1954 NOe 4,918 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1951 | Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: C. 0. Hadley, urs, Elizabeth N. Gray, Mrs. E. F. Nesbit, J. 0. Hunter, jEarl Adams, F. Scearr Morrison, Sr., J. H. Lafoy, W. Je Parker, H, B,,Sherrill, Fugene Baker, Robert C. Black, * ° Woogrufé U E S ’ ? charles Mack, George Mack, et al, T/ A. Chas. Mack and Sons Vs. | ¥, Ae Corriher | 1. Was the automobile of the plaintiff injured and damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER Yes 2. Did the plaintiff contribute to the injury of his automobile by his own negligence, as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER No 36 What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? ANSWER $100.00 (See Judgment below) BK ays BIS BI ME DIK Bhs BS 2K BE AS 2S 2k BGK oy STE Ph AE AE AAO Sys DIK DUS DK 21S JK AK 2S 5 38 OR NORTH CaRULINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL CUUNTY FEBRUARY TERI, 1951 Charles Mack, George Mack | Et Al, T/A Chas, Mack & Sons ! I { Vs. JUDGMENT W. A. Corriher This cause coming on to be heard at this, “anuary- February term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the following issues having been submitted to and found by the jury: 1. Was the automobile of the plaintiff injured and damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the Complaint? “nswer: "Yes", 2. Did the plaintiff contribute to the injury to his automobile by his own negligence, as alleged in the answer? Answer: "No," 3. What damages, if any, js the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: "$100,000". aaa aca eos a sens IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- JANUARY TERM, 1951 Thursday, February &th,1951 IT IS, NOW THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: by the c . ourt: That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $10 9400.00 together with the costs of the action, to be taxed by the Clerk of the c ourt, This the 8th day of February, 1951. F. Donald Phillips Be BRAC I a a BCA AIRE a a A a AKC IC aK aC a a ake ak a aca ae ale aa ak a No. 4833 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT REDELL CUUN IRUDE UUNTY FEBRUARY TERM, 1951 Mrs. Eula B. Parker, Plaintiff, Vs. Allen Edminston Upon the Coming in of the verdict the plaintiff moves to set aside the verdict of the jury as being contrary to the weight of the evidence, as the second issue was answered in the sum of $500.00 and that the same was inadequate for the amount of damages proved by the plaintiff. | The Court in its discretion sets aside the verdict ef=the.verdéet of the (uy of both issues and orders an entirely new trial as to both issues. | At the close of the plaintiff's evidence during the progress of the trial, the defendant, G, L. Parker moved for judgment as of non suit. The Court granted the same and proceeded with the trial as to the defendant, Allen Edmiston only. | The Court now reverses its ruling and strikes out the Order granting the iotion for — as of Non Suit as to the defendant, G. L. Parker, amd places tie said G, L. Yarker back in the same position that he was prior to the commencement of the trial, and orders an entirely new trial of the whole cause. This the 6th day of February, 1951. - Donald Phillips —_-— JUDG ESIDIN To th - e foregoing Order the defendant, Edmiston, in apt time objects and F. Donald Phillips —_-—— UDG . BK DK BK HE DE Bs he Oe die Be ale ate ale alc aie alc als ale aie ale sie she ate ot HE PE FE HE BEE BS HK BK BK BYE 3K BIC AK BC OIC 2 20 34c Oi aie ai aie a aie ale eae excepts, \ Hy 0 OR CUE SECOND WEEK <= JANUARY TER, 19 51 Thursday, February 8th, 1951 No. 4862 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mm, M. Warren { Plaintiff Vs. W. S. Hunter and wife, urs. We Se Hunter, and Mrs. Ae D. Creedmore, { { t JUD GHENT { i ! Defendants This cause coming on to be heard amibeing heard before lis Honor, F, Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding, at the January and February Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County; upon motion of Ww. 5S. Hunter and wife, /-rs. W. S. Hunter, co-defendants in the original cause, by ana through their Trustee, Baxter H. Finch, for equal contribution on the original judgment from rs. D. Creedmore, co-defendant in the original cause. the original judgment was rendered Ae And it appearing to the Court that against all three co-defendants; that the said \. 3, Hunter and wife, -rs. 4.5. Hunter were one joint tort-feasor and the said Mrs. A. D. Creedmare was one joint tort-feasor. And it further appearing that the co-defendant, Ww. S. Hunter has id 2/3 of the original judgment and cost and that the co-defendant, irs. A. D. Creedmore, has paid 1/3 of the judgment and cost; and that the total Bp judgment and cost was rendered in the sum of Four Hundred Fifty Six Dollars and 66/100, Now, therefore, it is ordered and adjudged and decreed that W. 5. Hunter and wife, mrs. W. 5S. Hunter are liable on this judgment in the sum of Tus en + mn rls 7 \ , - as 2. on & oo } Qn _— : 5 Dew two Hundred Twenty Light and 43/100 Jollars; that mrSe As Ve Sreedmare is lia } “a . ‘ —_ k enic ) h ble on said judgment in the same amount; and that the said W. S. Hunter recover of the said urs. A. D. Creedmore the aifference in money in the 1/2 of the said juicment (or Two Hundred Twenty Sight and 43/100 Dollars ) and 1/3 of the said judgment (or One Hundred Fifty Two and 26/100 Dollars), same being Seventy vix Dollars and 17/100. This 8 day of February, 1951. F, Donald Phillips Judge Presiding - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK <== JANUARY TERM, 1951 Thursday, February 8th, 1951 lo. 4,653 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ee IN TH a IN THE SUPERIOR court en NORTH vu ;ROLINA IREVELi, COUNTY ‘thel Cashion Campbell g, L. Daniels, Administrator of the Plaintiff ual the applies. i I 668; . for , yy aah verified rt from the .~ © £ o ) - os ; * * com! tLy na af Jovite subm ; ree Yu out thay 1mony without 1 se Q it further itted that ere plaintiff has not antann ond . 10n amd to wv i ae anivO Vv F, Donald Phil Judge Holding the 15th Judic Allie B. Johnson vs. Charles W, Joh v uiiits %. Wilson vs. Willie Lee W a ty a a tere NeGraw vs, Wildred N. MeGraw Continued Jean Austin i sate wuth Smith Plumer Continued Kickeri in McLain vs, James Blair McLain ------- Continued an Inc. vs. James Peeler et al, -------- Continesd sta Reavis vs. Mrs. Girlie Allen Continued ling. gens VSe de F Turman et al, ----------- soo Continued In tue uaiees ot vs. Vernon E Lackey et al ------ Continued Rachel Christ of the Probate in Solemn Form of Todd A Summer Bonner B pieces vs. Travis Carpenter ------ Continued Travis Carnenee, ey Willi ams Cont inued “oT reer 385 A, Fy Crees ----- Continued the a Imany »° ai 1ony he office of lips . % at the Courts ¢. jal District tg WAT Conti" estate of E. R. Daniels, Plaintiff Vs. lps. Frances Chapman (also known as urs, Frances Chapman Waugh), Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable 3, G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel that the parties heretofore compromised, adjusted and settled all matters at issue under the pleadings in the above entitled action and that the plaintiff has agreed to pay to the defendant, the sum of One qundred ($100.00) Dollars and the costs of this action and the defendant has con- ceeded that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and entitled to possession of the personal property described in the complaint: Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that one Hundred (%100,00 the defendant have and recover of the plaintiff, the sum of Dollars with interest from March 1, 1951, until paid and that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. It is further ordered and adjudged, by consent, that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and entitled to immediate possession of One 1939 }.odel Chevrolet fanel Truck, Motor Ne. 2211692, Serial No. 8JBO1-6686, described in the complaint in this action and is entitled to the certificate of title, key and any other items of personal property appertaining to the truck. This the 6th day of February, 1951. Smith Superior ‘TY CONSENT OF: RA re A ru rT A +. SAYMER & RAYMER, ATTORNEYS By: D. L. Raymer Attorneys for the plaintiif ¥ ; s pecan Me Simons ‘con li, Simons ‘dams , Dearman & Winberry By ¢ W = Winberry x orneys for the defendant ste rke she ae he aie ale she aie aie ate eae ake ae a ac ae 2s 3k ee atest ae ae me atc a ale cafe Bi a ae ale a} ae ae af a ae Be i 3c ie BC MK He He -No. 4939 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT IREDELL COUNTY irs. Frances Chapman Waugh, Plaintiff : Vs. ! R. L. Daniels, Administrator | of estate of E. R. Daniels, ¢ Defendant | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel that all matters at issue in the above entitled action and all matters in controversy between the plaintiff and the defendant have been agreed upon by the parties and that the defendant has agreed to pay to the plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of four Hundred (3400.00) Dollars and the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction of all matters and claims arising by reason of the matters set forth in the complaint in this action and all claims and demands of every nature whatso- ever within the scope of the pleadings of this cause of action or otherwise, Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, the sum of Four Hundred ($400.00) Dol lars, with interest from larch 1, 1951, until paid and the costs of this action, This the 6th day of February, 1951. G. Smith rk Superior Court le By consent of: Lacon M, Simons Macon I... Simons dams, Dearman & Winberry By: C. B. winberry Raymer & Raymer, Attorneys By D. L. Raymer Attorneys for the defendant io. 4670 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK kickerinos, Inc. Vs. James A. Peeler & wife Julie Peeler Trading as Julie's This cause coming on to be heard and it appears to the Court that the plaintiff Kickerinos, Inc. is represented by W. 5. Bogle, Attorney of Concord, orth Carolina and the defendants James A, Peeler and wife Julia Peeler are represented by Woodhouse and ward, Attorneys of Statesville, North Carolina. It further appears to the court that the pla iff and the defendants through their attorneys have agreed upon the amount and conditions of this judg- ment. Their signatures appears hereon. Therefore, it is found by the court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff for and in the sum of 3379.33 with interest from September €, 1948, until paid. ijudged : lecre hat the Now therefore, by consent it is ordered, 2Gjuagec slaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of with interest ~ from September 8, 1948, until paid together with the cos f this action to be taxed by the clerk. This the 6 day of Feby, 1951. Smith of Superior Vourt pount y Jonsent ie Se Bople attorney for Plaintiff wel, iiard, Jr, Attorneys for Defendants ees eee Alo. 4,612 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. Thomas and Howard Company of Hickory, Incorporated, Plaintiff, | WINAw PNM At Vs. JUDGMENT OF NO Clarence hioose, Defendant. ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the papers filed in this cause that this action was instituted on December 3, 1948, and that summons was issued on December 3, 19486, and was served on the defendant, Clarence lioose, by ade oore, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on December ©, 1948, and it further appears to the Court from the papers filed in this cause that the nature and purpose of this action was as follows: recover damages to the truck and property of the plaintiff caused by the negligence of the defendant when his tractor, operated in a negligent manner, ran into the truck the plaintiff on December 7, 1946. ears tothe ‘Court from the statement of Ad ams, Dearman and hie or the Plaintiff, that the matters and things arising in ‘ 2Pf aw : ; } . t ‘intiff and jefendant have not been settled, but that the time +r + ake voluntary nonsuit in this action. » upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for adiudged andd “eed ' pmeser hb and it is here judged and decreed that the plaintifi be, andi this action, and that the plaintiff be nom charged by the Clerk of this Court. Ce Ge. Smith —— Clerk of Superior Court of iredell Jounty, North Carolin Be. winberry t+armoay far } ; ittorney for the plaintiff Ho. 5000 IREDELL OUUNTY K, C. Eller Vs. Willer l.otor Express, Inc. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of c Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion for plaintiff of judgment of non-suit. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be non-suited and taxed with the costs. This the 12th day of Februar acils Ho. 4797 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Peoples Loan and Savings Bank Vs. ¢. A. Beam and wife, Teresa Beam This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court, and it appearing to the court that the action was commenced on the 6th day of December, 1949; and that summons and verified complaint were Served on the' defendants on December 7th, 1949, and that more than thirty days have elapsed and they have failed to answer the complaint in this cause. And it further appears to the court that plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the Pleadings, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $1500.00, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from October 9th, 1949 until paid, and that defendants be taxed With the costs of this action. This the 20th day of January, 1950. tect fees Court He A He HR MEH RRR HE HH HH HM Hee ae eae ie ae ak He ae ae me ee Me a ae Me nt hee oe ee ae het eo No. 4864 NORTH CAROLINA IN THS SUPERIOR CUURT TREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Statesville Industrial Bank, Inc. j Plaintiff { Vs. { JUDGMENT william M. Ford and Roosevelt Smyre | Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the undersigned Superior Court of 4+redell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to an action brought by the plaintiff upon a note and chat. tel mortgare, and that claim and delivery was instituted for possession of the alias claim and delivery was issued as set out in the is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be ereby G, Smith lerk Superior Court, County Ve ‘we Kent Harrington. This 17a ; e + : : } e4 this cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigh Jlerk Superic Ye ee 2 . the perior vourt and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued to Sheriff of Alexander County on February 20, 1948; that the said Sheriff retume the summons with a notation that "After due end diligent search, the Defendant could not be found in Alexander County," that the defendant has not been legal’) served with sumions and is not in Court } . Tt is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the action be and the 3 is h by suit ' 1S neredy nonsuited and the Plaintiff is taxed with the cost. This the 2&th day of February, 1951. C, G, Smith art Clerk superior ¥° Ie ME Ie Dis Be No. 4767 NORTS CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL COUNTY 3, C. Morrison, T/A Motor Repairs Works { ! VS. : 3, L. Sparks, T/A { ! 3parks Lumber CO. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Slerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, 2nd it appearing to the Court that summons was issued on September 23, 1949, and that no return has been made on said summons by the Sheriff of Iredell County. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by lat this action be and the same is hereby dismissed and the plaintiff is taxed with the coste This the 2&th dey of February, r ve ¥ e Ue vMvi -—-—_— slerk Superior Court aia m/a Viwy afer sompany en and irs. F.B. F B Allen's store This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- + ’ a ana 4 ay ring ¢ } Signed Clerk of Sunerior Court of lredell County, ane it appearing to the n . 4 an hy a T 24 -Ourt that the matters in controversy nave been settled and that the Pls intiff desires to take a voluntary non-suit; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action is hereby non-suited and the Plaintiff is taxed with the cost. This the 28th day of February, 1951. CG. @, Seste ATTRK SUPERIOR COURT nan No. 4.996 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ITREDELI COUNTY Bell, Carroll Bell and Bell, trading and doing ess under the partnership name of “. C. Bell and Sons, vs L. Gordon. mt. + his cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigne of Superior Court of tredell County, and it appearing to the Court tha + 6 “Gy c S 7 ipvromise has been had betw ~ nz seas " nn Wiad ae eee promise has been had between the parties, and the Plaintiir desires to take a oo ishbien meet y non-suit; Te te -hopea lara jered and a3 > } } ; } j It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the action be and the sare on-cuited and dismissed and the Plaintiff is taxed with the cost, ~ he 2nd day of March, 1951. cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk, and +* that Plaintiff and “efendant have adjusted all matters 2° her; things between then se ad 7 : E > themselves and that neither have further claim against the o plaintiff re haat 1t defendant has released her equity in the personal property to om in sotisfaction of her mortgage; it is therefore ordered and decreed; the action be dismissed by non-suit at cost of plaintiff. day of Feby, 1951. C, G. Smith - Clerk of the Superior Co No. 4039 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK. Helen M. Adams Vs. William E. Adams This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Undersigned Clerk Superior Court of +redell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non-suit: It is, therefore, ordered am adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and the same is hereby non-suited, and dismissed. The plaintiff is texed with the Costs of this action. This November 17th, 1945. C. G. Smith Clerk ouperior Court, Iredell County,North Carolina. ‘AD ~AeAe Te NUMAN ROLIN a IREDELL COUNTY uto Parts & Electric Co. Plaintiff, Vs. n G, \. bisenhiner,T/A y Mobile Service. Defendant. ; ‘ ae a ; hea h h This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the action is based on 4 Claim and Delivery and that sumions was issued on June 7, 1950, that no return has been made on said process showing that any property was recovered by the Sheriff of iredell County, and that the summons has not been returned by the Sheriff of said vounty 5 It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be and the same is hereby dismissed and the plaintiff is taxed with the cost, This the 28th day of February, 1951. By Consent: - Re A, Collier, Attorney for Plaintiff sete se ea se He AR ARM AH HAE AE I I TE I ‘ ——~ oe fe ee rte hes a. 3 opreseremceeerearontnerase She A ek Ade ten ene No. 4664 Noe 4&5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH & ti 7 NORTH CAROLINA im | IREDELL COUNTY i n, BE. Jarvig ond Leory Jarvis | Trading aS vorvis urniture ‘ Jompany T/A Diamond Ilill Coal Co. | : Plaintiffs, W. C. Chambers, Individual { , _—_— ee ee VS. | VS Henry L, Bennett | ee rant and wife, | ei k { : rene l ¥ : ‘ 1 A i This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of ‘een P 7 en ’ a 0 C o it appear ( tha ! ' 1 | Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appe ring to the Court that summons nis enuse coming on to LOrK i | , . ‘ A c a a ee ‘nee Sak ade said sum ; or , as issued on April 8, 1949, and that no return has been made on said summons superior Court, and it ring tot sourt i 4 wie by the Jheriff of Iredell County. n nd Delivery, and that um ons s j 1 o% ui ’ ; ; . , ‘ } + H It is. therefor _ jered and ad judged by the Court that this action , : - bai ’ herif! * lpedell C ity j \ oe “os r Vib’ * 4 , : - : 2 eee es eee | ' ‘ erel ismissed and the plaintiff is taxed with the cost, a hen no record 1 * that tl ; she f 5 i i | 3 th y of February, 1951. ; : , F : Yr - vw AWA ~ ~ 4 s J ’ aan | ; : ae’ ; | ro Ge omith “i +: hana tore edered by tl! Fourt wit iis action i Clerk cuperior Vourt v ’ , } / ‘ | | , ed ® te f i - mee" suVy | L i is - | - . v er’ 1 Sen i rrie y lainti ha ; a’ . e e 2 ! a a a ‘ ‘ + L } | ‘ j ° afi , | 1a Trt - | . eYoveeeeaba | j r . ” ’ ! } I | ton i ; . , ! e wibby ’ ’ maer \ | 4 on rtnoereh4 v f ’ ] , : . } re the ur ersig™ ‘ rsaip name , ae 4 7 su min; n ti ‘ eard e1ng ma UClviY 7 ’ tilsd, : Laintiff des - if j irt red I ‘ y id t, he tt | 1ey J tb ine A a * &. GUvpuUbSs _ ' 0 ¢ ; yoluntory non- ‘ e | } | j wines . ; . dy at dd ‘ ‘ } . he n-su- sliaQl ia n e anda LY Lé 4 e . A . . ‘ . . : - sata nation vs no 4 - ’ . ! ’ raere na 4 Uay,ecUu that tne Sala aces ' J? ’ & ve ' t \ v t vii i int ! . ‘ ( sfore t j rsigned Cler i 79 | Le w ‘ seen ° +o , . ' { the C { t sun S ye GU perio ourt rede!.] ULLY, a at prearing 6O vhs ‘CUSS SARS Seem perk id ”~ @ ‘ 7 ' + y Y I i WaS issued on December 10, 194), oe oe P es ~— Summons by the heriff of lredell sountye iis rne or ft tne , “a béudeead bi 1a C t that this ection ni Yr. titi It is, therefore, srdered and adjudged by the ourt i ; te tamed wv h st oer “6 and the same is hereby dismissed ond the plaintifé s taxed wits Sne cere es my one aa ro 5 1951 C, Gy, mith This the 28th day of february, . erk Superior court ae bal ey she ve she He Ue Me We He He ME Ie HON 349 Ao. 4980 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Bonner B, Kale, Plaintiff, Ys. Grady Williams, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to ’ na te Me the Court from the statement of counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendant has to pay to the plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of 100,00) Dollars and the costs of this action in full consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that _ and recover of the defendant the sum rad } s ~ ¢ : ~ a “~* osts of tnis ction to be t f? ‘ S & i , omen * SIerk of ouperior Court Iredell County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, March 12th, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA, i OUP EXIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1951 Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County aforesaid, on the 12th day of March, 1951, a. 0., when and Honor, F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding and Holding vourts for the Fifteenth Judicial District March Term 1, C. Rumple, High Being dul y sworn to it lillie Lee Wilson JORTH CAROLINA , arveras ’ ao someon ake ; ail JELL SOUNTY. i j it TERI, 195] Jennie S, Wilson | ‘llie Lee Wilson 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, Se at “ow Ausband and wife, as alleged in the ee Answer: Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, March 13th, 1951 2 Did the plaintiff end defendant separate from each other, and ha ve they lived separate and apart from each other continously for more than two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? vv Anaswer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for wore than six months prio to the institution of this action, aS allege in the complaint? Answer: Yes In the Superior Court, arch Term, 1951. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, F. Donald jury, and the jury having answered the issues sub- t in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as © in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds o matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and tae ~ declared null and void end are set aside, and the plaintiff is granted a divorce from the defendant. Donald Phillips Nu IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday; March 12th, 1951 Mo. 4945 Llummer I, D. P DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: auth Smith Plummer IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA MARCH TERM, 1951 IREDELL COUNTY. I. D. Plummer ZLSSUEQA Vs. Ruth Smith Plummer 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the Com- Answer Yes 2, Have the plaintiff and defendant been separated and lived separ- Re ately and apart for two years immediately preceeding the institution of this action? Answer Yes 36 Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for six months imuediately preceeding the institution of this action? Answer Yes NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY uarch Term 1951 I, D. Plummer VSe Ruth Smith Plummer This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Judge F, Donald Phillips, and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the record; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the parties hereto are hereby dissolved, and that the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce. F, Donald Phillips J t DG PRESIDING <a Sa rae Sk ESET saa ee SE SS INTHE SUPEAIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, March feth, 1951 No. 4960 Jean Austin McLain Plaintiff DIVORCE y Vs. THE Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworm answers the issues submitted te th as Colle amelle James Blair McLaihb Defendant NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Jean Austin licLain Plaintiff James Blair McLain Defendant | | { Vs. { } | | 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North period of six months prior to the institution of this actim answer: liave the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart fron ars prior to the institution of this ir MeLain efendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before mald F. Phéilline , . larch Donald F, Phillips, Judge Presiding and a jury at the danuarg Term of the hat the defends n svt His Honor, superior Court of +redell County, and it appearing to the Court t has been personally served with process, and the following issues having De mitted to and answered by the jury: 1. ‘ere the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married a8 alleged * the complaint? Answer: Yes las the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State e 5 A : 5 Carolina for at least a period of six months prior to the institution of thi action? Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM,1951 Monday, March l2th, 1951 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for at least a period of two years prior to the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. NOw, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the plaintiff Jean Austin MeLain, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the ce defendant, James Blair MeLain, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore exist- ing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. This 12 day of March, 1951. ¥, Donald Phillips , ; ’ . : , , Judge Presiding at the laren Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT fy Monday, March leth, 1951 MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, March 12th, 1951 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County ry Doris Roberts vayne E, Brannon ee Plaintiff IVCRGS ; f The Divorce Jury 1", being duly sworn empanelled answers the issues submitted as follows: ! { { { t | coer . a | and being heard before His Honor, cause coming on to be nealt areh T mm f +} Superior Judge residing and ¢ jury at the i.aren ierm i vne uperio c eS y ee ae WA = a Sounty; and the following issues having been submitted to an , aa ’ — w.4 ae te t andwered by the jury: l. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Come plaint? Answer: "Yes", 2. Didthe defendant unlawfully abandon the plaintiff, as alleged in the c “€ Complaint? Answer: "Yes." _— _ . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT on MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, March l2th, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, March lath, 1951 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolin: for six months next preceding the institution of this action? in: Answer: "Yes." Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiyy Sarson Goodman Vv rs, Mary Doris Roberts, be, and she is hereby granted a divorce from bed and M board from the defendant, Clarence Roberts. further ordered that the defendant shall until the further it is order of this court pay to the plaintiff as alimony the sum of One Hundred ] month, beginnin; e Dollars on or before the 15th day of each calendar f March, 1951; and it is further ordered that Twenty Fiv the defendant p:y c th the months — +) oe Y the sum of One Hundred Dollars for her counsel fees, o the pleintiff t! nd it further appearing to the court and the court finding as a fat are three children of said marriage, Brenda Joyce, Phyllis Ophelia, are minors and have been living their m t sparation of their parents; and it fact that the plaintiff, is of said control of aw na d Phillip: ies Jonald n ‘ 4 @ Judge Presiding sworn and emp anelled to it as follow: ’ - sOure carolit” resident of the State of North : : 9 tion of this act ion: ceding the*institu ° } e defendant married as alleged in ” and have they live Je vere the plainti@f and defendantbeparated, jon ° years next preceding the institut swer PM apart continously for two arate and Answer. Yes aww action? " A OPonlun OU RT aaa MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, Mareh 12th,1951 Te TYORCE . f “he Divoree Jury 71". beine a YH Ss. ' ine Jivorcee vury , ? coal ng duly sworn and em | ty ANC a +h 3 2 gS anhmsit+tay én : = = ¢ ACs > ane) )o4 im | ' unswers the issues submitted to it as follows: im 1 oy Overcash 1 ; a f Ng mr 7 1 Li i Mat) ww db ¥ e Si 1 ’ ‘4 Hs TOR rT ae nny In the <aee. SUE vourt | 4 Awd tle larch Term, 1951 i |) lene Overcas { | r | % 1 J ie es Se | ITS s U De a : : 22424 & | al oy Overcash. { a al, mia |. i i 7 i -~* | ay ; / | 5 am « a. _ tunes OF . at Q 3 : > ‘ere the plaintiff and the fendant marr g : ow husband ite : e defendant married and are now husband ang | i we ife, 2s set t in the Complaint '. ie rit * ~ ~~ wea : ie ' i L . Pith Lie | | + rg in} S the Plhintiff, alene Overecash, lived separate and apart from the ’ : Tae ef : _ oe ue eekeu eee | ’ re i or 10a of two years }¢ vo tne iiling of the inh i, t n + ee ; ’ S . i CULO! | } ¢ . ~ ’ ie + rf 1] a3 imi. - Lif, .ten vercash, e resident of iredell County, ah : a : sbi f six months vrior to the com.encement of this acie i ” eee - 4} In € per. or > O1 rt, : : irch Term 1951 : n } ° i ° | ee Si i al a a } ap —or A J vUaw i } naming . : ’ . . . 2 1 “ h Ter . 7” oming on to be heard and being heard at tis the J.arch +¢ ' . red ounty rt) ar ie +9 £ ’ , a + 2 ‘ - ify f alc nvy, rth Carolina, superior Court, before his llonor, F, Yona ¢ Judge Presidi | = Jee end 6} : : ie itted ng, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitis t 1e > rt r % a &} Hi.ad -22 ; -. . in ae ave initavor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, as set out record ] “af i S t ir e amaaran -« J ,2 ; @ 2 : 5 02 't is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the Bond latrimony heretofore exi stine ean ; J toiore existing between the Plaintiff, Alene Overca toy Uvercash, be and the - same are hereby dissolved, and the Plaintiff is he F. Donald Phillips Judge Pres £ 3k 3 ; sie ste ate ste ste ale ste ste ste ale vie ate ste ale ste ste aie ae 3c HEME DE a BE Be ale Se ale ate she she she ae aie afc Be Is aie BE IE KIS ~ eal a heals 34 Q } granvea an alsolute divorce from the defendant. gh and the De®" MARCH TERM, 1951 Monday, March 42th,1951 No. 5006 Jarren L, Beaumont DIVORCE The Divorce Jury ;/1", being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Vse Z3everly Simpson Beaumont IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, NORTH CAROLINA, MARCH TERM, 1951 IREDELL QUNTY. Jarren L. Beaumont Plaintiff, IH B3everly Simpson Beaumont, Defendant. | { Vs. { { ] l. Were the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes 2 Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state of North Carolina ~*@ for six months next preceding the institution of this action? INSWER: Yes 3 Have plaintiff and defendant lived separate ind apart for two “°@ 2 successive years next preceding the institution of this action? ANSWER: Yes NORTH Car INA, IN Tho SU! MLOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM 1951 darren L. Beaumont, i Plaintiff, | Vs. | JUDGMENT FOR PLAINT FF. Beverly Simpson Beaumont, | Defendant. } At a Superior Court, held in the Court House in Statesville, N. ©., on the 12th day of march, 1951. $7 Present: Hon. F. Donald Phillips, Judge. + ° ‘ % ’ 2 ‘ s ana }h , i action having been heard by tne Sourt and a jury and the follow my, . Nl a ing issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: : 1. Jere the plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes : 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the institution of this action? ANSWER: Ys. 3. Have plaintiff and @fendant lived separate and apart for two Successive years next preceding the institution of this action? ANSWER: YES IT I$ NOW ON MOTION OF NSLSON WOODSON, COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF, ADJUDGED that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant be, and they are hereby, dissolved and the plaintiff is granted a divorce a vinculo from the defendant. F, Donald Phillips JUDGE PRESIDING FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. see ee se see se ee es ee MR RH OR ICSE HH ORE HEE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT é 6 eae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1951 = Monday, March 14th, 1951 Alo. 4938 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL CUUNTY Robert Leonard Brown, By and Through his Next Friend, Hugh G. Mitchell Vs. Dr. Ge Re Vowels, and Grady Dorton It appearing to the Court tht Lewis, Lewis and Hedrick, cCouncel duly icned to the above named plaintiff, has prosecuted the cause of said plaintiff successful determination and has recover for the benefit of said plaintiff sum approved by this Court, and the Court finding as a fact that the services rendered by councel in behalf of said plaintiff were reasonably worth the sum of Three Hundred and No/100 (5300.00) Dollars. It is, therefore, ordered that the Clerk of this Court pay to said services rendered by him in behalf of said plaintiff the sm (°300.00) Dollars out of the monies paid judgment entered in this cause, paid to i. eee oe a siain > ° . ! ildred Sont inued Loretta Parker vs. fllen Udminston-------- Continued fo mes 5, Campbell, ------- dnerv: .llison vs, \.illim Tomlin et al,---- Continued omith vs. Jolphus 0 Owings et al, -----= Continued S. Gilleland, ------ Continued Le. Campbell, -<---= ‘ont inued _-- Continue Unive so] ia f 4 tne r ‘ . rs Qn naversal wWlining 1 Q ; VS. Statesville J ack CO. \ for the Defer’ r the Defence” e he Defen Cont inued for the for the defen? nef ent” for the Deies for the Defe* Wo. 5008 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Auto Parts & Electric Co. = JUDGMENT Roy Johnson This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior. Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons and Claim and Delivery was issued on February 5, 1951, that no return has been made on the process showing that same has been served, that the defendant has not been served and is not in court. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the vourt that this action be and the same is hereby dismissed and non-suited , and the plaintiff is taxed with the cost. ~ This the 13th day of laren - ’ ie ith Clerk ounerior Court Alo. 5009 NURTH CAdULiNA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Auto Parts Electric Co. vs Hill Maltea This cause coming on to be heard and being heard efore tne undersiened Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons and Claim and Delivery was issued on February 5, that no return has been made on the process showing that same has been Served; that the defendant has not been served and is not in court. It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that this action be and the same is hereby dismissed and non-suited, and the Plaintiff is taxed with the cost. This the 13th day of March, 1951. C. G, Smith Clerk Superior Court RCI Ojala i kelak sok ak aiatoie tok ei i koa ai ei Sie i No. 5010 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR couRT No. 4807 yoRTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Auto Parts & Electric Co. IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK vs JUD i TT? Forrest L. peavs es Richard Church Plaintiff vs JUDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Ure. Gurley dant ee ef 88 ee 08 ee 68 undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing sae35 fe FSS SF ITD to the Court that summons and Claim and Delivery was issued on February 5 This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of ’ Superior Court by agreement of counsel for plaintiff and defendant, and it 1951; that no return has been made on the process showing that same has been served; that the defendant has not been served and is not in court —** il cai nae oe It is, therefore, ordered and adiudged by the Court that this action er satire laa Mi tipi eo ee oe were unable to agree on the amount of damages to be paid by the defendant oes be and the same is hereby dismissed and non-suited, and the plaintiff is to the plaintiff, that they might select a third appraiser to act with them, vt. ee taxed with the cost. and the amount fixed by any two appraisers should be binding, and that the sat a BS = POET ES This the 13th day of March, 1951. ve Clerk might enter judgment upon such report. It now appears to the Court C. G. Smith that the two appraisers were unable to agree, and that the parties through Clerk Superior Court their counsel selected as the third appraiser G. L. Wilson of Statesville; that the three appraisers met and discussed the value to be placed upon the building for the work claimed by the plaintiff, and after viewing the property two of the appraisers; namely, A. M. Gaither and G. L. Wilson, have rendered a written report find that the defendant should now pay to the plaintiff the sum of Nine Hundred ($900.00) Dollars in full for the improvements placed upon the defendant's land. It is, therefore, by agreement ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff shall recover from the defendant the sum of Nine Hundred ($900.00) Dollars with interest from the 9th day of February, 1951 until paid; that all witnesses are to be taxed against the party causing them to appear in Court, and that the actual court cost shall be paid one-half by each of the parties, It is further adjudged that the defendant shall have thirty days to Satisfy this judgment before execution shall issue. The judgment is made a specific lien on the land described in the complaint. This the 13th day of March, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Hees i HO HORS IRI I RA HAART ARIA TAA TTT Noe 4998 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT J. M. Schafer Plaintiff vs JUDGMENT John A, Miller and wife, Elaine E. Miller Defendants This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Homorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons in the above entitled action was issued on the 22nd day of January, 1951; that the Sheriff of Iredell County made his return on said summons showing that the defendants were not to be found in Iredell County and/or the State of North Carolina; and that service of summons by publication has been had upon the defendants in a due and »oroper form: And it further appearing to the Court that a warrant of attachment was issued on the 22nd day of January, 1951, ordering the seizure and attachment of all of the property of the defendants which might be found in Iredell County; that said warrant of attachment was returned on the 22nd day of January,1951, showing that certain reul property in the name of the defendants, and situate in the county and state aforesaid, had been levied upon and taken into the custody of the sheriff with notice thereof being posted upon the said real property: and that notice of the issuing and of the return of the warrant of attachment was duly advertised in the Statesville Daily newspaper, once a week for four successive weeks, as required by law; That the time for filing pleadings on the part of the defendants has elapsed and that no answer, demurrer or other pleading has been filed by the defendants, or any of them: And it further appearing to the Court that this is an action brought to recover the sum of Five Hundred Forty-Three and 50/100 Dollars, with interest at 6% per annum from June 23, 1949, due the plaintiff by the defendants on a note signed by the said defendants; and that the defendants have no personal property in this State from which satisfaction or attachment could be had: Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover judgment against the defendants, John A. Miller and wife, Elaine E, Miller for the sum of Five Hundred Forty-three and 50/100 Dollars, with interest at 6% per annum from June 23, 1949 until paid, together with the costs of this action; that the attached property be sold by the Sheriff of Iredell County, as in case of execution, and that the net proceeds of said sale be paid into theoffice of the Clerk of the Super'io satisfaction of the foregoing judgment, either in protanto, or in full; r Court in order that said net proceeds may be applied to the that any surplus over and above the amount of said judgment, together yith the costs of this action, remain in the office of the said Clerk for the benefit of the said defendants. And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this jug- nent shall be operative only to the extent of the net proceeds from the sale of the property of the defendants, which has been attached, and that this judgment shall not operate as a personal judgment against said defendants or any of them. This the 19th day of March, 1951. Cs G. Smith, Cs s. CG. Be HE MSE EAE I A a AE CAE CEA I 2 2S CIE BIE A 2 HE HE ACC Be EAE 2IC I ARI IK 216) Mo. h 921 NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT MRS. P. JANE WOODWARD vs. JUDGMENT HARVEY L. CAMPBELL This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that all matters and things in controversy between plaintir¢ and defendant have been settled, and that the defendant has reconveyed the property to the plaintiff, or other person suitable to the plaintiff, and that all matters and things in controversy have been agreed upon; IT IS, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a judgment ¢ nonsuit be and the same is hereby entered in this cause, and the defendant is taxed with the costs of this action. This the 23 day of February, 1951. C. G. Smith BY CONSENT: her Mrs. P. Jane x Woodward Plaintitt mark Trivette, Holshouser & Mitchell Attorneys for Plaintirt Harvey L., Campbell efendant By R. A. Collier torneys for Defendant Witness to mark: Mrs. S. J. York RAR SIIK qaiok sk dokg ke sak yesae geak ai Xe a yo. 5024 forth Garolina Iredell County Ann Gale Brown Plaintiff In the Superior Court vs JUDGMENT Holland Badger Brown Defendant This cause coming on to be heard,and being heard before the Honorable Carl ¢, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in her action: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 29th day of March, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court Consented to: Finch & Chamblee ttorney for Plainti R, A. Collier Attorney for Plaintifr kAhkhhkkkkekekkKEERRKEK SEK KER HE EE a a * ee * \ Se epee eee = ae se #: par Goad LFF ie ee | ' | bea : ; | No. 5017 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Hope Poole Baker Plaintiff JUDGMENT vs Marvin Isaac Baker Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiff has elected totake a noneuit in her action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and be taxed with tie costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 29th day of i.arch, 1951. U. G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court Consented to: FG vhamblee we es Attorney tor PTaintirr Fu KK KK Ke ke kk Ok ok ok wk mw Kk em x0. 4967 yorth Carolina | In the Superior Court, Iredell County | Before the Clerk. y, Be Smith, Plaintiff, | Jolphus 0. Owings and wife, inate B. Owings, R. G. Stroud and wife, Lula Pr. Stroud, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the superior Court of tredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendants have compromised and settled all matters and differences existing between themselves and that the defendants have paid in full, by way of compromise the agreed settlement; And it further appearing to the Jourt that the plaintiff, by virtue of said settle.ent, waives any further right, clain or denand that he might have xy virtue of the Sales Agreement between himself and Dolphus O. Owings and wife, recorded in Deed Book 213 at page 297 Registry of Iredell County, and that the slaintiff now desires to take a valuntary non-suit; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged ana decreed t:a the action be and vhe same is hereby dismissed. It is further decreed that the rights of the plaintiff in the contract alleged in the complaint, have been fu ly satisfied ana that the plaintiff has no further rights in said contract and the same is cancelled of record b: avreement of tie varties. The defendants are taxed with the costs of t.is action. This sarch 30, 1951. C. G, Smith Sonne eee “Tierk Superior dourt — greed to: 4, B, Smith a A. Collier torney Or tne Plaint for the Defendants: 42%. Stroud eR No. 4955 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY AO» 5042 IN THE SUPERIOR courT JOHNSON CITY, TENNESSEE - APRIL 20, 1950. Court met pursuant to adjourmment, present and presiding the Sherrill Lumber ee Honorable Joe W. Worley, Chancellor, when the minutes of April 19, 1950, were ain read and approved, and the following additional proceedings were had and ordered vs. d or record, to-wit: H. H. Hodgson, entere ‘ Defendant % BLMER L. STEWART IN THE CHANCERY COURT VS AT se This cause coming on to be heard before the undersi igned Clerk of the GLADYS POWSLL STEWART JOHNSON CITY, TENNESJEE. Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the <BLDEE = BEET EB Court that the Defendant has been properly served the summons and has not answered AE: or otherwise filed pleading in this matter within the time required by law, And it further appearing to the court that this is an action on two notes under seal and tiat the amount to which the Plaintiff is entitled is a definite amount and that the Plaintiff is entitled to Judgment by default final, It is therefore on the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, attorneys for the Plaintiff, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Plaintiff have and recover of the Defendant the sum of $647.51 with interest on $272.51 at the rate of 6% per annum from May 1, 1946, and interest on 3375.00 at the rate of 6% »er annum from March 5, 1948, and for the cost of this action. the 4th day of April, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court BE IT REMEMBERED, that this cause came on to be heard before tue Honorable Joe W. Worley, Chancellor, holding the regular term of Chancery Court for Washington County, at Joinson City, Tennessee, on this 20th day of April, 1950, and it appearing to the Court that publication was regularly made as required by law, requiring the defendant to appear and answer the bill in this cause, and that she has failed to appear and make answer thereto witnin the time prescribed by law, upon motion of complainant, the cause as to the defendant is taken as confessed, and as to her set for hear ing ex parte. Tie cause came on to be further heard upon the original bill, the pro confesso eretofore taken and entered against the defendant, tie oral testimony of witnesses examined in open Court and the entire record at large, ‘rom all of which the Gourt is of the opinion that the defendant wilfully deserted complainant this cause, and than two whole years prior to the filine or the original bil!) in have not resumed marital relations since that tine. ee ene maqren AN Nee 2 owl +} Cou IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECRSED by the Court that the bonds of matrimony subsisting between c up}ainant and defendant be and the Same are hereby forever dissolved, and complainant is awarded an absolute divorce from the defendant and restored to all the rights and privilezes of a sin;le person. The complainant is taxed with the costs oi the cause, ior which execution will issue. ENTER: Joe W. Worley Chancellor. STATE OF TENNESSEE WASHINGTON COUNTY I, Walter E. Saylor, Clerk and il.aster of the Chancery Courts for “ashington County, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy 0! the final divorce deqee in the cause styled: ELMER L. STEWART -vs- GLADYS POWELL STEWART, as same appears of record in my office in Minute Book number 26 at pages 46h and 165, Witness my hand and official seal of said Court at the office in Yohnson City, Tennessee, on this the 2th day of March, 1951. (SEAL) Walter &. Saylor te ou ok me me we OK OR OH SAS Seah atl ee LAE. PRES BT OT oe SEE Saeea E « 7 =F = tf “ Pi rh he fe Li ee Se ; MO. 5042 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Carolina Motor Co. vs J. ke. Brown This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the »arties in question have settled their differences and that the plaintiff desires to take a judgment of nonesuit. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the action be and the same is hereby non-suited, and the plaintiff taxed with the costs. This the 19th day of April, 1951. C, G,. HO. 499 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY L. C. Pope, Plaintiff, iii JUDGMENT Howard Hicks Gaswick and the American Transfer & Staage Company, Defendants. THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the superior vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing from the statei.ent of counsel that all matters in controversy arising upon the pleadin s have been settled, compromised and adjusted and that the defendants have agreed to pay the costs of this action. NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT IS UaAbDeRED AND Ave DGED: 1. That the plaintiff be and hereby is nonsuited and the cause of action set forth in the Complaant is forever dismissed. 2. That the defendants pay the costs ol tnis action. This the 23 day of April, 1951. WE CONS: NT: SMATHERS & CARPENTER BY: Wiliam B, webb attorneys for the :laintiff canmm my QD VULL & COLLIER BY: KR, A, Gollier attorneys for the Defendants No. 5007 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Smith-Douglas Co., Inc., PLAINTIF¥ VS. Clint Sigmons, DEFENDANT This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court, and it appearing to tue vourt from the statement of the Attorney for the plaintiff that the mattersand things in controversy have been settled between tie parties and that plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk, This the 24th day of April, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court Consented to: Zeb _V. Long, Jr, Attorney for Flaintiff MO. 5047 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Raeford L. McLain, a Minor, by His Next Friend, Tom McLain, Plaintiff, -VS- Voight Little Hoover and C. R. Young, Defendants. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County upon the Motion of the defendant Cc. R. Young for the removal of said action to Mecklenburg County, and it appearing to the Court that Mecklenburg County is a proper county for the trial of this cause, and it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff, through his counsel, does not oppose such removal: IT IS THEREFORE, ORDEKED that this action be removed for trial from Iredell County, North Carolina to Mecklenburg County, North Carolina and it is further ordered that all original papers in this cause be transmitted to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County. This the 7 day of May, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court or Tredel. County WE CONSENT: R. A. Collier ttorney for the plaint . BRIS RR ROI Rm XC RC I a RR A OK aR a MER Ha HR NO. Be JUDGMENT i SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Paul R. Ervin, Administrator of the Estate of | Spring Term, 1951. Marion Lipe, deceased i vs. | No. 383 Iredell County. Cannon Mills and Fred Allen i This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion that there 4s no error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the y the Honorable W. A. Devin Justice, be Opinion of the Court, as delivered b to the intent that the judgment be and n said opinion. certified to the said Superior Court, the same is hereby affirmed according to law as declared i And it is considered and adjudged further, that the Defendants do pay the costs of the appeal in this Court incurred, to wit, the sum of Twenty and 10/100 dollars ($20.10), and execution issue therefor. (oot, on page 378) SSOYys Es ae 21% a Re a = ae ius A TRUE COPY Adrian J. Vansto Tlerk of the Suprens Court, Filed in the office of the Clerk o& Superior Court, Iredell County ’ North Carolina on the 8th day of May, 1951. Cc. G. Smith er uperior VCourt WR AE AK BSB He EI AE EI ENE IK EAE HERE AC HE YE BC CAE AS Ie OY NE DY a HC 2K. a JNo. 50644 STATE OF GEORGIA PETITION FOR DIVORCE RICHMOND COUNTY TO THE SUPERIOR CUURT OF SAID COUNTY VS. $ JANUARY TERM, 1944 KATIE LEE MILLS TERRY RALPH C TERRY Ralph C. Terry, of said State and County brings this his petition for divorce against Katie Lee Mills Terry, ahd alleges: 1. That petitioner is and has been a bona fide resident of said State and County for twelve months prior to the filing of this petition and resides at 1026 Rgynolds St. Augusta, Georgia. 2 That on Decanber 25, 1929 petitioner and defendant were married and ever since have been and are now husband and wife. 3. That petitioner and defendant are now living in a bona fide State of separation and have be+n since September 1940. 4. That in September 1940 the defendant deserted your petitioner and this desertion has been comtinuous and uncondoned by petitioner, 5. That as a result of said marriage there were three children; Jay Coit Terry, age 12 years: Fern Jonnsie, age 6 years; ami Raymond Larry, age 4 years , WHEREFURE, petitioner prays that he have a total divorce from the defendant, that is to say, a divorce, a vinculo matrimonii, upon legal principles, and that process issue requiring the defendant to be and appear at the mxt term of the said Court to answer this complaint. R. L. Chambers PETITIONER'S ATTORNEY STATE OF GEORGIA IN RICHMOND SUPERIOR COURT RICHNOND COUNTY LIBEL FOR DIVORCE RALPH C. TERRY WANUARY TERA 1944 vs KATIE LEE MILLS TERRY Personally appeared before the undersigned authority, who by law is duly authorized to administer oaths, Ralph C. Terry, who, after being duly sworn, deposes and says that Katie Lee Mills Terry is a non-resident of the State of Georgia and her whereabouts are unknown to deponent. Ralph C. Terry Sworn to and subscribed before me this 17 day of November, 1943 Frank E Courtney State of Ga. at Large Filed in offiee this 2nd day of December, 1943.6 Julia P. Brodie, Deputy Clerk IN RICHWOND SUPEAIOR COURT LIBEL FOR DIVORCE VS ener OF PIBLI KATIE LEE MILLS TERRY : ORDER OF rs . > om as oe a It appe aring to the Court from affidavit at tne plaintiff ana tne allega- “© : 1 ndar (9 Mills Terr is a non- tions in the petition, that tne defendant, Katie Lee Mills Y>» i for “dd d th e on resident of tae State of Georgia, it is theretore ordered that service ication -equired by statutes process be perfected on mid defendant b: publication as req ired b} e This 6thiay of December, 1943. A. L. Franklin eé Se C. Ae C. AFFIDAVIT _O¢ PUBLICATION ATTORNEY OR AGENCY Re L. Chambers BUSINESS Attorney STATE Of GEORGIA: RIC4MOND COUNTY.: j ays Personally appeared Pat He. Rice, Ire, who being duly sworn say that he is the Adv. Mgr. of THE AUGUSTA CHRONICLE, a daily newspapre pub] ished F Divorce in Augusta, in mid State and County, and that the advertisement Libel For on of Ralph C. Terry vs Katie Lee Mills Terry duly appeared in said newspaper the folloring dates, to-wit: December 7, 8, 1943 & Jan. 7, 8, 19bb- Pat H. Rice, Jr. Sworn to and subscribed before me this 21 day of Jan., 1944, Louise D. Johnson Notary Public, Richmond County, Georgia (Hemepaper Notice) GEORGIA, RICHMOND COUNTY: RICHMOND SUPERIOR COURT+-LIBEL FOR DIVORCE--JANUARY TERM, 1944, Ralph C. Terry vs. Katie Lee Mills Terry. To defendant Katie Lee Mills Terry, You are hereb:; required in person or byattorney, to be and appear at SUPEAIOR COURT, to be holden in ani for the county aforesaid, onTHIRD MONDAY in JANUARY, 1944, thereto answer Plaintiff in Libel for Divorce. In default of su¢h appearance, said Coutt will proceed as jutice may appertain. Witness the Honorable A. L. Franklin, Judge. This 6thday of December, 1943. Dan J. O'Connor, AFFIDAVIT OF FUBLICATION Armm Vy AADMAYW r T a na AilLUNiol OF AULIWUl iLe de CHAMBERS r oO r , UOLI Low Ad 1 ORNEY STa.i OF GEORGIA, : RICHMOND COUNTY. ° Personally appeared MARIE LEROY, who being duly sworn says that She is the SuCRETARY OF THE AUGUSTA CIIRONICLE, a dg@ily newspaper paper published in Augusta, in said State and County, and that the advertisment LIBEL FUR DIVORCE OF RALPH C TERRY VS KATIE LEE mILLS TERRY. duly appeared in said newspaper on the following dates, to-wit: DECEMBER 7, 8, 1943, JAN. 7, 8, 1944. Marie LeRoy Sworn to and subscribed before me this 20 day of MARCH, 1944. Louise D. Johnson . Notary Public, Richmond County, Georgia (newspaper Notice) oT cima RICHMOND COUNTY: RICHMOND SUPERIOR COURT--LIBEL FOR DIVORCE==-JANUARY TERM, 1944. Ralph C. Terry vs. Katie Lee “ills Terry. To defendant Katie Lee Mills Terry, You are hereby required in person oF by attorney, to be and appear at SUPERIOR COURT, to be holden in and for the county aforesaid, on THIRD MONDAY in JANUARY, 1944, there to ans wer plaintiff in Libel for Divorée. In default of such appearance, said Court will proceed as justice may appertain. Witness the Honorable A. L. Franklin, Judge. This 6th day of December, 1943. Dan J. O'Gonnor, Clerk R, L. Chambers, Attorney Dec. 7 8 * Jan. a ‘. STATE OF GEORGIA : DIVORCE RICHMOND COUNTY FIRST VeRDICT RALPH C. TERRY vs $ JANUARY Toi., 1944 IN RICHMOND SUPERIOR COURT KATIE LEE MILLS TERRY We, the jury, find that sufficient proéfs have been submitted to our consideration to authorize a total divorce, that is to say, a divorce, a vinculo matrimonii, upon legal principles between the parties in this case. This 22 day of Jan., 1944. Wm. A. Murphy FOREMAN STATE OF RICHMOND . DIVORCE RALPH C. SECOND VEKDICT vs IN RICHMOND SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TER)., 19b4 KATIE LEE MILLS TERRY We, the jury, find that sufficient proofs have been submitted to our consideration to authorize a total divorce, that is tosa’, a divorce, a vinculo matrimonii, upon legal principles between the parties in this case. We fix the richts and disabilities as follows: We find that the petitioner and defendant may marry again. This 25 day of March, 1944. Fred L. lhiatthews Foreman IN Ti SUPZRIOR COURT OF RICHMOND COUNTY DECREE OF COURT IN TOTAL DIVORCE RALPH C. TERRY VS KATIE LEE MILLS TERRY Georgia, Richmond County. Two concurring verdicts favoring a total divorce to plaintirr having been rendered in the within case, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that said marriage be and the same is, hereby annulled and a total divorce granted between the parties with liberty to the plaintiff to mar again, The defendant shall be at liberty to marry agaiy, : It is ordered that this decree take effect as of March 25, 1944 and be entered of record nunc pro tunc,. This 19th day of April, 1944. A. L. Franklin ingest Cirepie STATE OF GEORGIA CLERK'S OFFICE RICHMOND COUNTY I, Dan J. O'Connor, Clerk of the Superior Court of Richmond County, Georgia, hereby certify that the above and foregoing typewritten matter is a true coph of the proceedings in the case of RALPH C. TERRY VS. KATIE Lis MILLS TERRY, Libel for Divorce, of file in this office, IN WITNESS WHEXEOF Ihave hereunto subscribed my hame and impressed the se f id C 4 i al of said Coutt, at Augusta, Georgia, this 6th day of June., 1944. Dan. J. O'Connor Vit , » rh Or COUR RICHMOND COUNTY, GEORGIA Wo. 5033 statesv of North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County before the Clerk Statesville Brick Company Versus | JUDGHENT Frank H. Crow This cause coming on to be heard before tne undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court and it appearing to the Court tnat tne action was instituted on the 12th of April, 1951 and that Summons and complaint were both personally served on the defendant on the 17th, of April, 1951; That more than thirty days have elapsed and the defendant has failed to make any appearance by answer, motion or demurrerr, It appears to the court that the action is based on an account stated in wnich the plaintiff sold ana delivered to the defendant mercandise in the amount $315. and tnat the account has been due anc owing to Plaintiff since Septeuoer 24, 1950. and tnat plaintiff is entitled to a judgment by default final against the defendant. It is therefore, adjudged and decreed; tnat plaintiff recover oi the defendant the sum ot $315.00 with interest from september 24th, 1950, until paid and that defendant pay the cost oi this action. Tnis 18th of Lay, 1951. GC. Gs. oman Clerk o1 tue Superior Court ss. = ~~ ome oe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 21, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 21st day of May, 1951, at 10:00 O'clock, A. Mh. when and where His Honor, F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, 1951, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Bolicitor and Prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and proseauting in the name of the State. J. U. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and opened Court by order of tne Court. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court the names of the following good aid lawful men and women to serve as jurors for the may Term, 1951, First Week, to-wit: Phillip McLaughlin Frank H Sherrill George Goodman D L NeKay. Cecil W Lackey H B Gilleland Harris P E£ Sherrill Sam C Gaither Weaver A D Goforth Lloyd Cashion Beaver C. L. brown Mrs F L Williams: R M Hollar Fred T. Grant T N Gilleland 4 Craven Harry Goldstein. J Cnester Jo..nson mrs Jack Burgess. J B Caldwell W R Brumley Leonard U Caldwell Clyde R Hunter Carl P Holland P D Cain A & Gray J G Templeton, J A Tomlin was sworn as officer in charge oi tue Grand Jury. Harry Goldstein was excused by Dr.'s certificate. Mrs F L Williams was excused by the Court Mrs D L hieKay was excused by the Court Mrs Jack Burgess was out of the State J G Templeton was not returned. Mee 1103 FALSE PRETENSE tate Alias Capias vs Guy Ramsey No, 1312 AWDW State v8 Alias Capias Charles E MeLelland No, eas RAPE vs Continued Flake Mullis No, State” ) POSSESS LIQUOR Alias Capias vs Mary Saunders Wo. 1366 State vs Ervin Feimster No. 1361 State vs Ervin Feimster State vs Ervin Feimster No. 1363 State vs Ervin Feimster No. 1364 State vs Ervin Feimster No. 1387 State vs Johnnie }.eten No. 1463 State vs Russel Waugh INo. 1419 State vs David Franklin Smith ‘No. 1465 State vs Troy Fesperman Wo, 14,66 State vs Jlarence Baxter INO. 14,09 State vs Henry Edward Pegram ‘No. 1489 State vs Henry Harper Wo. 1440 State vs Velma Moose ‘No. 1490 State vs Paul Dewey White IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WRRK --e- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 21, 1951 FORGERY Alias Capiaa FORGERY Alias Capias FORGERY Alias Capias FORGERY Alias Capias FOxGERY Alias Capias AWODW Continued under former order MURDER Alias Capias RECKLESS DRIVING Continued for the Defendant SPEEDING Continued for the Defendant OPEXATING A GAMBLING HOUSE Continued for the Defendant LARCENY Nol Pros With Leave AWDwW The Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Instanter Capias. AWDW The Defimdant called and failed. Judgment nisi Sed m and Instanter Capias. is A neste LIQUOR IN PLACE O# BUSINESS NOT USED A ils a doh 4 Continued for the Defendant | io. 1491 State itt Dewey White Wo. 1494 tate vs “IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «--- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 21, 1951 POSSESS TAX PD LIQUOR IN PLACE OF BUSINESS NOT USED AS A RESIDENCE Continued for the Defendant. T & P NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Continued for the Defendant. James William Campbell JNo. 1498 State vs Wm Henry Greene No. 1499 State vs Clayton Campbell Wo. 1500 State vs Grace White No. 150} 4 State vs Lonzo Smith No. 1502 State vs Lonzo Smith No, 1503 State vs Emma Johnson WNo, 1505 State vs Ollie Smith Moore Ao, 1509 State vs Toby Hyde State vs Clemott Bennett Mo. 14,95 State vs Bruce Mayhew RECKLESS DRIVING Continued for the Defendant POSSESSION & SALE Continued for the Defendant HIT & RUN Continued for the Defendant RECKLESS DRIVING The Defendant called and failed. and Instanter Capias. DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED The Defendant called and failed. and Instanter Capias. POSSESS NON=-TAX PAID LIQUOR Continued for the Defendant MANSLAUGHTER Continued for the Defendant LARCENY The Defendant called and and Instanter Capias. BREAKING, ENYERING & LARCENY Continued for tne Defendant DRIVING DRUNK Deft through his counsel It appearing to and seven children and of another child, upon motion of t is continued to the next terile Judgment Nisi Sci Fa Judgment Nisi Sci Fa failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa enters a plea of guilty. the Court that the defendant has a wife his wife is now ill expecting tne birth he deft prayer for judgment rat fee | IN THs, SUPERIOR 7 ' i uM or id 4 st COURT Monday, May 21 1951 =" FIRST WEEK --- MAY Tim, 1951 , Monday, May 21, 1951 ’ Hos. 1517 & 1518 oe ENTERING & LARCENY 1527 ate he defendants*through their c eee s vs of venue to the end. that the sasse be tren @Xchangy 1529, 1530, ames Louis Brown from the criminal court docket of Iredell ¢ orted 532, 1533 Lindsey Eller Criminal Court docket of Gatawba,County to suit tot stave these cases may be disposed of @ases pending ageig” A ied Robert Johnson ack I 1528 BREAKING, eNTHRING & LARCENY 1931, The defendants each through their counsel waive the finding of bill in each case and enter a plea of guilty of breaking, entering & larceny. Nos. 1527 and 1534 are consolidated. 1528 and 1535 are consolidated. 1529 and 1536 are consoli- the sauwe defendants in that C hue vourt. The motion of We29 a 1530 and 1537 are consolidated. 1531 and ae are conso ated. a the defend ehie‘tne Clark of tads Sauce tranoses "att Ott fa verer 132 ane $285 1232 ent 1939 ice smieciadaneds ay ese two cases t : 8 in Nos n are con iat i County and there co us aoeicles ae ot Catawba 1530, 1537, 1938 Nos. 1527 and 1551 ee Boden 20a? Bot SAPte meine, & 15329 | Cours. y the Clerk of saig 1539 & 451,6 As to each defendant, the judgment of the vourt is ii State that the defendants be confined in the State's Central vs Prison at hard labor to wear stripes for not less Re lix Lunsford A WD W With Intent to Kill , than TREE nor more than FIVe YeARS. a — enn nee Nos. 1539, 1532, 1540 and 1533 are consolidated for No, 1402 judgment. State vs Aauuel Asbury Reavis W=37 No. 1541 itate vs Menry Lewis Denny C-19 No. 1507 state vs ‘Janes Rudolph Thomas C=-37 No. 1508 State vs John Vance Knox, ali John Vance Evans lia avery Anox C=17 cs Aw o . The defendant tnrough his coun é ' sel tenders of guilty of A W D W, which plea the State euee Judgment ot the Court is that the defandent o confined in the common jail of Iredell County for ee TWO YEARS to be assigned to work daiee san I sio < ti lig j W rate Boat fg of the State Highway & Public Works BREAKING, wNTcRING & LARCENY The defendant through his counsel waives the finding of bill and enters a plea of guilty as charged in warrent. : Judgment oi the Court is that the defendant be conrined in the State's Central Prison at hard labor to wear strives tor not less than LIGHTEN nor more than THIRTY-SIX MONTHS. it is ordered that the property be retumed to the rightful owner, BRAKING & cNTERING my a The defendant enters a plea oir Wolo Contendere _ After hearings the State's evidence tie Court directed a verdict oi not guilty. BREAKING G& wNit. LNG & LAit JENY al pc aes turough his attorney J. G. Lewis nters a plea euilty. a ee for breaking and entering, the judgment os ok ates . a p nfpsecod of CW SLVE iO% HS to be assige 7s we ve oul ision of the otate Hi gnway — Lic orks Comission, Un tne count for larceny, Judgient of the court is nat the defendant be confined in the Comuon dail tor period of TWO YSARS to be assigned to work under the + u ry ms ~ ; ais _ tne otate Hignway ana Public works lactam le eukmaetea’ te Sentence on tip count for the Pals mikes pended lor a »eriod of tive years upon - Owing expressed conditions: not viahebe a jeiendent be ot general good : aoue Sey 95 Une laws oi the otate. : it is naeniete work at some gainful occupation insofar #& I? cas . him to obtain employment. said ni . — to appear to the vourt at any of the contitic paiod that the defendant has violate SS 20nS upon which tne prison sentence 15 eo On the second count, capias and commitment -O issue wnen ordered by the Court. upervision oO! behavior 2 time withd d any Nos. 1510, 1544 1545, 1540 & 1547 State vs /Ruby Williams Mullis W-28 No. 1509 State , vs ‘Toby Hyde NOS. 1513 & 1514 State vs John Henry Parker We21] As to each defendant, Judgment ot the Court is that the defendants be confined in the State's Central Prison at hard labor to wear stripes for not less than FIVE nor more than TEN YsARS. The prison sentence in these four cases is suspended for a period of FIVE YEARS after the defendants shall have completed the service of the sentence heretofore imposed upon the expressed condition; that tne defendants and each of them be ot good benavior and not violate any af the laws of the State; that they work roculaely at some gainful occupation. If it is wade to appear to tne Vourt at any time within said period tnat tne defendants have violated any of the conditions upon waich tae prison sentence in these cases is suspended, capias and commitment to issue to put tne prison sentence into eflect wnen ordered by tne Vourt. LA RU ENY The Defendant enters a plea of guilty. Prayer for jua;ment continued tor a period of THREE YEARS with authority oi the Court to pass judrwent at any subsequent Term. ‘tne defendant is placed on probation. under regu}ar probation judgment with special conditions 01 prooation opdered oy the Court, as follows: the defendant snall make a home for ner enildren and live with her children; tuat sne totally abstain from the use ot aiconolic beverares. LARKUENY It appearing to tne Court that tine detendant has deposited with the Sle: k ot tne Court the sul ol $500.00 in casn in lieu oi bond, and at this term of Court tne defendant was ciled and tailea to answer. It is, tnerefore, orderec by the Court tuat tne 5500,00 casn now in tne hands ol tie Clerk be and tne sawe is nereby confiscated and condemned ior tne use and benefit oi the school fund of Iredell Vounty, and it is further ordereca by the vourt that tie Glerk oi tnis vourt transfer said money to the sceool fund of Iredell County, tnere to ve used as provided by law. SAKING, sNTHRING & LARCENY Bae fealant enters a plea oi nolo contendere. In No. 1514, on the count for oreaking and entering, judgment of tue Court is that the defendant be Con~ fined in the State's Central Prison for not less than It is respectfully QNB nor more than qwO years. recommended by tne Court that tne defendant be he First Offender's Camp either at Committed to t : r at Aloermarie. ww'on the count for larceny in 1514 and on the count for tewporary larceny of driving an auto without con- sent oi tne owner in 1513, these two counts are — consolidated for judgment. The judgment ol she Court is that the Defendant be confined in the State's Prison TWO nor more than FOUR YEARS. The for not tease o8.3 counts is suspended for a nce on these two ried of FIVE YEARS after the cowpletion of the sen- tence imposed on the first count in No. 1514 upon by expressed condition that the defendant be of gener good behavior, not violate any of th (Continued on page 390 gest @ TEST e laws of the State Nos. 1513 & 1514 State vs John Henry Parker We21 No, 1486 State vs JVArlie Flake Bennett Wed This He 1b i , tonorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday jorning, * 1951 at 9:30 O'clock, IN THe’ SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK #-- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 21, 1951 | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY (Continued from page 389) and that he work at some gainful | he totally abstain from tbe use of aleshont {| oi all kinds and descriptions whatsoever for cverat | period ot five years, 7 om If it is made to appear to the Co ‘ ‘ within said period that the defendant hae ve (stm any of the conditions upon which the prisee sare is suspended on the last two counts, capias ee com.itment to issue to put the prison sentence ; effect wnen ordered by the Court, ~ » And that } DRIVING DRUNK | fhe Defendant through his attorney J. G, Lewi 1 enters a plea of guilty. ; , | The judgment of the Court is taat the defendant } be confined in the Voison Jail o: Iredell County for a period of SIX 1.0NTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Hi. hway and Public works Commission. The prison sentence is suspendea for a period o: TwO YLARS upon the followin: expressed conditions: : iia 1. ‘that at this tern o: court the defendant ry into tne office oi tne Vlerk Superior Court a Fine. ot $150.00 and tne cost oi the action. 2 what he pay into tne ofiice oi the Clerk superior Vourt tne sum oft $310.00 for tue use and benefit o1 william Pnarr for doctor's bill in having nis head sewed up because ol tue wreck. : 32 shat tne defendant snall abstain i all alcoholic beverages of all kinds ions wnatsoever for said period ol t: Ir it is made to appear to tne Vour itnin said #1Vi YoaR period taat iefer violated any of tiie conditions upon wnich t t Spended SMXsMsxsBEuNd CUAL, capias G to ssue wnen ordere tne vourt. S¢ Tne Defendant enters a plee of not guilty. . vury sworn and empanelled ana returned a verdict of not suilty. lay 22, \ JUDGE MRooLDING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --= MAY TERM, 1951 Tuesday, May 22nd, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes accordine to adjourment on Tuesday Morning, May 22, 1951. The following were sworn as talesmen jurors for the week: L. © B R. Bb. Parker. No. 1485 & 1486 State vs Allie Bryant, U=-29 “ Aoe Teasley, U-27 No. 1489 otate vs jhenry Hirper No, 1522 State vs yvlemott Bennett No. 1511 otate vs Willard xobert Marlow No. 1543 State vs Gaston Tuck No. 1523 State ? vs Walt Coffer . Redmon, U. G. Adkins, T. Bb. Wetmore, Vance icVaniels, H. H. Sigmon and / : / ‘ zy ASSAULT WITh D&ADLY wisaPON : The defendants enter a plea of guilty as charged. In 1485, Juigment of the Court as to Willie Bryant, is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period ot o1X MJ NTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the sate Highway and Public works Com.ission. The prison sentence is suspended tor a period of TWO. YEARS upon the following expressed conditions: 1. At this term of tne Court the Defendant is to pay into tne office of the vlerk Superior Court a fine of 350.00 and tne cost. 2. ‘That he be ot general good behavior and vio.iate none oi tne laws ol tue otate,. 3, That he at all times keep the peace toward Joe Teasley. In No. 1486, as to Joe Teasley, judgment of the court is that tne defendant be confined in the Cor..on Jail oi Iredell County for a period of SIX MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of tne State Hichway and Public Works Comuission. The prison sentence is suspended for a period of YEARS upon tne following expressed conditions: 1. At this term or tae Vourt the Defenaant lé to pay into the oivice oi the Clerk Superior vourt a fine o1 $50.00 and tne cat. : 2, Tnat he ve of general good benavior and violate none oi tie laws of tue otate. 2 That he at all times keep tne peace toward Willie Bryant. Mary LW rv ASSAI bi With VEAUVLI APON A True Bill bDaALAARLI fe tiivu A True Bill LARCENY The Vefendant tenders a plea oJ nolo contendere — to violation oi Section 20-105 o1 General Statutes ol N. C. entitled "Unlawful taking o1 a vehicle without | consent oi tre owner ana itn tne invent to temporarily deprive the o ner oi such venicle without intent to steal tne same", whicn plea is accepted by the vtate. It is the judgment o: te Court that the Jefendant be coniined in the Conwon Jail of Iredell County for a period of TwuiVh IHS to be assigned to work — under the Supervision of the otate hifi way and Public Works Comission, and it is respectfully recomended to the prison authorities that tne Defendant be confined in tne first Ofirenaer's Camp either at- utner or to the cauwp at Albermarle for the service oi tne sentence. + MURDER A True Bill ASSAULT WITH DEADLY wEAPON A True Bill ik i at tie a! pcb tae 8s 3 inate vain nial inte | ‘ i ee neal ——— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM Tuesday, May 22, 195’ 4734 No. 1524 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State A True Bill vs “Walt Coffer No. 1525 ASSKULT WLTH DEADLY WEAPON State A true Bill vs Walt Coffer No. 1526 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State A True Bill vs ~L. ©. Wall No. 1516 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WikAPON State A True Bill vs jLovette Roseboro No. 1521 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY State A True Bill vs /Hile Carl Williams GRAND JURY REPORT mnwe jiAY This, 1951 IR#“VeLL COUNTY SUPoxIOR CUURT The Jury met ..ay 21, 3951 wits all mewbers present. we investigated and passed on all bills and complaints that came before us. we Nave investicated by committee County Home, County Court House, nty Jail, and smooresville Vity Jail. Tne entire jury visited tae Prison Caup, Tie committee wnic t t i Ommittee wnica went to tie County Home reports everything in food orde;: ivi ; g der. All living quarters are in clean sanitary condition and grounds wel] D ; , j ell kept. On the Vounty arm, we found a herd of 22 nice jersey cattle ) d pic é » 45 nogs and pics for next year's meat, a nice flock o1 chickens with about T} 400 small cnicks. ‘There were about 100 pieces oi cured meat in the meatnouse, There are 16 whi i n é > wn 7 s$nmoa e-s s ; waite women inmates anu 14 white men inmates , 10 colored women anc inmates and 2 colored men inmates, 4 white male prisoners, col 4 ored male prisoners and 2 colored fe.ale prisoners. The recor-y j ad Orendation made at last term of court for repairs at Comey Home nave all been taken care ot, A comitt t’ e " ee of six of the Grand Jury inspected the County Jail and found the top floor to need paint and plaster repairs very badly- The roof or walls have been leaking causing plaster and paint to fall ef» T he electric wiring is in bad need of outlets & switches so as to comply with City & State electric Codes, The screens for the windows are rotten IN HE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1951 Tuesday, May 22, 1951 (Grand Jury Report Continued) and many should be replaged. Many of the window sash are also rotten and snould be replaced. Portions of the cornice gutter snould be repaired. The boiler should be thoroughly cleaned and inspected for safety & sufficient capacity. The part of the Jail that is in use was found to be in good condition. The prison record shows three white women, fourteen white men and eleven colored me Ne A committee of tne Grand Jury inspected the Iredell County Court house and found it to be clean and in good condition. A conmittee of the grand jury also inspected the jail in l.ooresville, and found it to be a fire hazard. The building was brick veneer with wood floors. ‘The city trucks of some six or eight witn motor oil & other supplies stores under the jail. ‘There was also a not air furnace in the basement, We understood that the building had been condemed by tne State Jail Inspector. However we are led to believe that the jail is still being used in certain portions oithe day. ‘Tne cells were very tilthy ami in an unsanitary condition. There were no prisoners in the cells at the time of our inspection. Tne comudittee oi tne Grand Jury to investigate the prison camp We find all buildings in excellent condition, bedding good. Wwe also found numerous vegetables growing in the gardens, food was excellent, and we hisnly comuend the superintendent and the personnel on tneir orderly way of keeping tne prison in such excellent condition. Wade H. moore Foreman oi Grand Jury ASSAULT WITH U#AVLY wEAPON The Defendant enters a plea of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon which plea the state accepts. ; Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in tne common jail of Iredell County for a period ot BIGHTSEN MONTHS t® be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. No. 150, TRANSPORTING State The defendant through his attorneys 4. G. Lewis and Eugene " Alexander tenders a plea of nolo contendere. : ‘Ralph Shue Judgment of the Vourt is that tne defendant be confined in vice the common jail ot Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONT assigned _to work under the supe rgisioi: of the BO uighway and Public Works Commission. Noe 1519 & 1520 BREAKING, ENYERING & LARGENY reas vefendants enter a plea of not guilty. L he Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: P. E, Sherrill, Uther "Luke" Kimmer | H, B, Gilleland, Sam C, Gaither, T. N. Gilleland, L. C. at Mathis alias Redmon, U. G. Adkins, a. H, Weaver, A. J. Beaver, R. M ‘11 hathews Uraven, A, E. Gray, f. Be Wetmore, Vance mcVaniels,. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST wobK --— MAY Timm, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 395 Tuesday, May 22, 1951’ FIRST WEEK --- MAY TER Wednesday, May 23, 151? ee ae ee | he This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Wednesday ta Morning, May 23, 1951. wi ih No. 1487 | maa araeth bd i i State e defendant through his ~SUPP ha ny | vs enters a plea of “wae. Je G. Lewis Hos 1487 oT eee ae | ee Wa ! | Aunior Richard Campbell | ‘ oy sworn and empanelled as follows: Philli vs | be eantined ta the Seumbn futi seteueelt deeeey ie i Lt r S aeralen “G. eh hee : Lackey, , Junior Richard Campbell | _ a os of SIX MONTHS to work in and around HR) ) a Goodman, Lloyd Cashion, J 2 Caldwell? ceoree lve 21 LS gel a coe Supervision of the Jailer and | / 1a Temata’ i L _. 2 4a . s We E oe e prison sentence is suspended for qt i y, Leonar aidwell, and P. D, Cain a period oi FIVE YesaRS upon the following expressed np . n and answered the following issue: "Is the Def conditions: Hh ie dant the father of a child born out of wedlock 1. ‘that the defendant pay tne cost o: the action Ae a to mary Beaty on December, 13, 1950? Angwer: Yes. at this term ol the Court. if i ) 1 The Jury returned a verdict of guilty, + 408, 2. That thedaefrenaant pay into the office ot the | ae | a ag Superior Court on Saturday of this term, to-wit, | mn 13 - May 20, the sum o: 35,00 ior tne use and benefit of ! 1 : No. 1543 | MURDER the ille:itimate oniid born to ary Baitty on Dec. | my State { The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a bod 13, 1950, and the sum oi 35.00 eacn Saturday there- | | ie vs j (Zighteen present? a True Bill ot Indictment a after until the further orders of tnis vourt. i i 1H {Gaston Tuck, Sr. | ing the defendant, Gaston Tuck, sr., with the Te 3. That the defendant pay into tie office or the | Hee Ss capital offense of Murder in words and figures as Clerk Suverior Court tne sun >t $100.00 to be applied hi | Me follows: for tne hospital bill and doctor's bill for the birth ad a sae eal ook of said child, said money. to be paid to the father ] i a ; "STATE OF NOKTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR CUURT of Mary Baitty who has heretofore paid tne nospital i} ti] By IREVELL COUNTY MAY CRIMINAL TERA, 1095) and doctor's pills, Ht | Hh . tt, ae : 4. That tne defendant give a bond, to be justified ae a 1) ee e THE JURORS FOR THe STATE UPON THIk OATH PRESET: and approved by the Clerk of this Court, in the sum jae ie | That Gaston Tuck, Sr. late oi tne County of Iredell of 3750.00 for his personal appearance at each criminal i Pe ee on the l&th day of February, A. D., 1951, with foree term of this Court to show compliance with this order see ial and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, or any future orders or mmifications oi this order made iy Va i wilfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforetaowit, by any court at any subsequent tern. it i | a did kill and murder one Eugene Davidson contrary If it is made to appear to the Court at any time ee a aa ai to the orm of the statute in such case made and within said period that the defendant nas violated ti i vy provided, and against the peace and dignity of the any oi the conditions upon wuich the prison sentence Ea ant | otate. is suspended, capias and conmitnent to issue wnen Ne | | a Zeb_A. morris ordered by the Vourt. i | | | ai Solicitor. Wa minh "No. 1543 No. 1457 | BASTARDY id ie State j The Defendant enters a plea oi nolo Vontendere. 1h a | nl STATE vs Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- ¢ : ae . \Paul xevere Plyler fined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a al nh GASTON TUCK, Si. W-28 period of SIX |0NTHS to be assigned to work under E the supervision of the State Hicnway & Public Works eel FS IhoICTRENT - Commission. The prison sentence is suspended for a Hil | ne) MURDER period of FIVE YxARS upon the following expressed ia i ey conditions: : iif 1. Tnat the defendant pay tne cost ol tne action. | | ee Witness 2. That on tne 2nd day of June, 1951, the defendant ) ba is to apy into the office of tne Vlerk Su. erior vourt We | . x J. C, Rumple the sum ot 37.50 for the use and benefit o1 said i } Sam Laws minor child, ana the sum of $7.50 on each saturday 0 Or. J. San Holbrook thereafter until the further orders of tne court. ] - The Court retains this cause for further orders, ) } Those marked x sworn by tne to the end that tne payments may ve increased or . | i undersigned foreman, and examined decreased as tne condition or the parties may warrant. as before tne Grand ae a a The defendant is to give a bond in tne sum of it found A TRUE BILL. $500.00 to be justified ana proved by tne Clerk Te : of this Court, tor his personal appearance at each | i ~ aS =< see rand Vary criminal term oi court during said period ol suspension. ; - I€ it is made to ap ear to tue Vourt at any time ! within said five years period tnat tne defendant ms violated any of ne conditions upon which the prison sentence is suspended capias and commitment to issue : ee | when ordered vy tue Vourte No. 1432 | #ANSLAUGHTER : State Continued by the Court. vs \Alton Dawes Crouch onor able Court takes ar ecess until Wednesday Morni &» ’ 1951 at 9: 30 O'clock, t Nos. 1519 & 1520 Stage vs tyatner "Luke" Kimmer ill Mathis, alias Will Mathews > “ o)} ay } IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK <-- NAY TERM, 1952 Wednesday, May 23, 1951 No. 1496 State vs fida Gregory BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY THE Defendants enter a plea of not guilt Jury sworn and empanelled and returned - verdict of guilty as to each defendant on both counts of breaking, entering and jarceny. As to Will Mathis alias Will Matthews, the judgment oi tne Court is that the defendant be confined in the State's Central Prison at hard labor to wear stripes, for not less than ONi nor more than TWO YsARS. The Court strikes out the judgment heretofore entered, tor the reason that the defendant after the court nad pronounced judgment made a threat or tnreatening remark to one of the prosecuting witnesses, Mrs. Ruby Johnson, to the effect that ne would get even with her when he got out of prison. The gudgment of the Court is, on the cout for breaking and entering, tnat the derendant be contined in tne State's Ventral Prison at aard labor to wear stripes ror not less than TWOLVE nor more than TwenTYsFoOuR muuTHS. On tne count for larceny Judgment ot tne Court is that the defendant be confined in the State's Central Prison at hard labor to wear stripes for no& less than three nor more than FIVE Y The prison sentence on tnis count is uspended ror a period oi FIV YHaRS after the com letion o. tne sentence imposed on tne first count pon tne following expressed conditions: 1. that tne defendant be of ceneral rood benavior and not violate any ot the laws of tne State, 2. That ne work at some gainful occupation in far as it is possible for him to ottin employment, 3. ‘That ne keep the peace in every respect; that he not molest by act, word or deed i.rs. xuby Johnson rs. im.a naynes. t 1efendant breaking and enterx the defendant Prison for not less re than THIkTYeSIX | tne count for larceny, - /Ourt taat the defendant be ventral Prison to wear stripes for not less than iREE nor more than F1Vui YoARS. fhe Prison sentence se second count gor larceny is suspended for a FiVe YSARS after tne defendant snall lve of tne tence on tne count he servic: - and entering, on the followng expressed 2 sil Pp u Noa 1501 & 1502 State vs fLonzo Smith "Luke" Kim..er, on the ing, the judgment of the be confined in the State's HTHSN MONTHS nthe LUuLNner + Ant Vesa & Judgement o! : ‘ i. 4 . + +h at § coniinea in une otate - en was 1i@ snall be eeneral rood pvenavior and . Ol tie laws o. the State. snat nue hall not nolest by word, act or deed in any way or in any wanner i.rs. xuby Johnson, /Is. wma naynes ana mr. s.orris Laton, or any other witmess wno testified ror the state in this case. : If it is made to appear to court at any time within said FIVE YEAR period that the defendants. have violated any ot the conditions upon which the prison sentence is suspended on the second counts capias and commitment to issue wien ordered by tne vourte Upon the comins in of the verdict tne defendants move the Vourt to set aside the verdict and ior é new trial for errors committed oy tne Court and a8 being against the weirnt of the evidence. fotdon Overruled. Defendants except. Judgment pronoun¢ aS appears in the record, to which the defendants except and appeal to the Supreme court in open ae Further notice waived, Appeal vond fixed in the § ?100,00, By consent, the defendants are allowed al 70 days in which to make up and serve case on wo to the Supreme Vourt, and tne State aliowed 30 day thereafter vo serve countercase or file exceptions. Appearance bond fixed as to tne defendant Matt pir in the sum of $1000.00, to be justified and as 4 ag by the Clerk oi this Court. Appearance bon *00 to Luther "Luke" Kimmer fixed in the sum of $1500.%, be justified and approved by tne Clerk of this Court. a oS vu c IN THE SUPERIOR COURT’ FIRST WEEK «<= MAY TERM 1 i Wednesday, May 23, 13st” ASSAULT ON A MINOR The defendant through her counsel J. G. Lewis tenders to the State a plea oi geuilty oi Public Drunkenness and assault on a child resulting in serious injury. It appearing to the Court that the defendant nas been in jail awaiting trial about two and a half months, it is the judgment of tne Vourt that the defendant be confined in the common jail for a period of THIRTY DAYS on the Public Drunkenness charge. On the charge oi assault, it is the judgment oi the court that the defendant be confined in the common jail, to be assigned to work in and around the jail under the supervision of the jailer and the High Sheriff for a period of SIX MONTHS. The prison sentence on this count is suspended for two years on the following con- ditions: 1. That she be of general good behavior and not violate any ot tne laws of the State. 2. That she totally abstain from the use of al. alcoholic beverages oi any kind or description what- soever. 3. That she work at some sainful occupation in so far as it is possible for ner to obtain employment. If it is made to appear to the Court at any time within said TWO YxARS that the defendant has violated any ofthe conditions upon which the prison sentence is suspended on tne second count, capias and commituent to issue when ordered by the VCourt. RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVING AFTER LICENSSD REVOKED The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and eupanelled and returned a verdict of sudity, as charged, as follows: P & Sherrill, H B Gilleland, San C Gaither, T N Gilleland, L U Redmon, - C G Adkins, J. H. Weaver, A J Beaver, Kk M Uraven, A & Gray, T 8 Wetmore, and Vance mcDaniels. This Honorable Court Takes a recess until Thursday Morning, May 2k, 19§1 at 9:30 O'clock. JUDGE FREOLIUING Soe CSEEY SRE STR SE DPA TARE ETT BORE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --= MAY TERM 1951 Thursday, May 24, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Thursday Morning, May 24, 1951. No, 1515 State vs /Herman Lee Daniels No. 1467 State vs vVRoy Bumgardner W=0 ) No. 1468 State vs Roy bumgardner No. 1469 State vs Roy Bumgardner Nos, 1476, 1477 1478, & 1479 State vs &. V. Scott C=25 DRIVING DRUNK Defendant’S counsel pleads the statute of sian of limita. The pleg of the statute ot limitations and the action dismissed, ween POSSESS LIQUOR The defendant enters a plea of cuilty as It is the Judgment of the Court that’ the detesien be confined in Common Jail of Iredell County for period of EIGHT MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. The prison sentence is Suspended for a period of TaREE YEARS upon the following conditions: 1. At this term of Court the defendant pay into the otfice of the Clerk Superior Court a fine a $200.00 and the cost or the action. 2. That he be ot general good behavior and not violate any of the laws of the State. 3. ‘that he not nave and possess any intxicating beverages of any kind or description whatsoever in his home or elsewhere, and that he not sell at his place of business any beer, wine or other beverages of any kind that contain alcohol content to the extent it would be intoxicating liquor. If it is made to appear to the Court at any time within said THREE YEAR period that the defendant has violated any of the conditions upon which the prison sentence is suspended capias and commitment to issue when ordered by tne Court. POSSESS FIR&WORKS Nol Pros With Leave. POSSESS PUNCH BUARDS Nol Pros With Leave. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL _ vetendant tenders a plea of guilty of Assault with Deadly Weapon, in each case, which plea is accepted by the State, Nos. 1476 and 1477 are consolidated for judgment. Judgment oi the Court is that the eer a confined in the common jail ot Iredell County for 4 period of TWO YEARS to Se assigned to work under the Supervision o. the State Highway and Public works Commission, Nos. 1478 and 1479 are consolidated for judguent. The judgment of tne Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail oi Iredell County for a period of THREE YEARS to be assigned to work under the Supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. The prison sentence on the last wo cases are suspended for a period of FIVE YEARS ole the defendant shall have completed the service of the Sentence in Nos. 1476 and 1477 upon the followng expressed conditions: d 1, That he shall be of general good behavior an not violate any of the laws of the State. 1 or * ae he shall not own or possess any piste gun during said period, , 3. That ne shall totally abstain from the ws e? coholic beverages of all kinds and descriptions ge soever, withis If it is made to appear to the Court at any pepe any Said FIVE YZAR period that the defendant has violat of the conditions upon which the prison sentence 1® Suspended &n the cases 1478 and 1 capias and ¢ to issue when ordered uy’ the ate . Nos. 1430 & 1493 State s buat Lee Shoemaker 9 10/09 No. 1542 State vs Wecil mayhew No. 1497 State vs Roosevelt Turner Nos. 1481, 1482 & 183 > State vs George Fraley mahaffey IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK =-- MAY TERM Thursday, May 24, 1951 1954 ' DRIVING DRUNK Defendant enters a plea of nolo contendere in each case. These two cases consolidated for judgment. It appearing to the Court that this is the third conviction ot operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, the defendant having been previously convicted on the 12th day of April, 1947, and the two cases in which he has entered a plea during this term of court, it is, therefore, the judgment @ the Court that the defendant be confined inthe common jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision af the State Highway and Public Works Commission. It is requested by the Court that his driver's license to operate a motor vehicle in the State of N. C, be revoked for an indefinite period by the Motor Vehicles Byreau of the State of lh. C. Since the defendant has been operating a motor vehicle not with license issued by the State of \. C. but one issued 4 the State of Florida, it is there- fore ordered by the Court that a transcript of this judg- ment be forthwith sent to the Motor Vehicles Bureau of the State of Florida by the Clerk of this Vourt. Rt. 1, S. Daytona, Florida. Lic. #708392. Eyes, Grey Highth 5' 9" Weight, 160. Lic. issued 9/30/50. AT.EMPTED RAPE ' Continued for the State. ASSAULT ON FEMALE Continued for the State. TRANSPORTING & POSSESSING NON@TAX PAL LIQUOR: SPEEDING: RECKLESS DRIVING: By consent these three cases are consolidated for the purpose of trial and are treated as separate counts in the same warrant, two counts in 1461 charging the defendant with unlawful and wilful transporte img 24 gallons of non-tax paid seerer? and in the second count of unlawfully and wilfully possessing 24 gallons non-tax paid liquor, third count ot speeding, and fourth count of reckless driving. On each count the defendant enters a eee not -uilty, wnereupon a jury was Sworn and eupaneiied. -” 3 the sioee oi tne States evidence the defendant withdraws his plea of not cuilty and enters a plea of uilty on all counts. . In 1481, judgment of tue court is that the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and the cost, ; It is ordered that the automobile in which the defendant was transporting the four cases of non-taxed paid liquor be confiscated, anda that the automobile be ——, ’ Sheriff ot Iredell County and advertise oF" sl iecas mF scoording to law and the net proceeds and disposed 0 from me sale of said car be turned over to = schal , 1 County as provided by law. sweating to bbe Sour’ that there is a valid lien against said car in the sum of $703.08 due to H. J. Setzer, it is therefore ordered by tne Court that in the sale he sheriff according to the provisions of pf said er ne said lien of $553 788 Be paid to H. J. Setzer out of the proceeds of said sale and the remainder after the payment of said lien shall be turned over to the school fund of Iredell County as provided by law. On the counts for paar pooneceses of Se ding and reckless driving, are cohso idated for judgment. It is the sul gene’ a the Court that the defendant be contined in the om for a period ot TWELVE MONTH redell Count eae Selene to work under the supervision of tne State Highway and Public Works Commission, (Continued on page 4,00) TR RIIC ve Neen acREN Ree BE EERO OT EN ST FOU TOnE FR Ore OT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT e IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «<= MAY Tim, 1951 ae FIRST WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1951 Thursday, Mgy 24, 1951 Taursday, May 24, 1951 TRANSPORTING & POSSESSiNG NONSTAX PATD , 1522 | BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Nos. 1481, 1482 LIQUOR: . + | (Con't from page 4,00) & 14,83 SPEZDING: RECKLESS DRIVING: (Con't from page State ne prison sentence is suspended f 399) vs vs ot TAKE TERns from the rising or this court rie Aile Carl Williaus George Fraley mahaffey the following expressed conditions: C=26 W-25 1. That the defendant shall be of general good behavior and not violate any ot the laws of the State. . Tet ne, she are have and possess at any time dur. sa er any quantity ot' - or non-tax pasd whi skey or’ a coholic Severeaha'n No. 1489 | The defendant enters a plea of guilty as charged. any kind or description whatsoever, vease | Judgment of the court e that eke defendant If it is made to appear to the Court at any time within said FIVE YEARS that the defendant has violated any of the conditions upon which the prison sentence is suspended, capias and commitment to issue when ordered by the Court. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON pee eee ee 3. That he shall not operate a motor vehicle vs x : 7 be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for upon the public highways of N. C. for a period Aenry — {| a period of TWO YEARS to be assigned to work under of TWO YEARS. C-38 : d : If it is made to appear to the Court at ony a of the State Highway and Public Works time within said THREE YEAR period that the defendant has violated any of the conditions MANSLAUGHTER upon which the prison sentence is suspended, capias Noe 1350 Ray and couuwitment to issue when ordered by tne’ Court, — deans ae ae er eee John Price Sherrill Jury Sworn and empanelled.as follows: P ; —— Nos. 1501 & 1502 RECKLESS DRIVING: DRIVinG AFTER LICENSE RXVOKED; — ' Oe cee 1's Gee, € 6 leeds, 2 aes Some, State | The defendant having been convicted of driving Fred T Graht George’ Goodman Lloyd Cashion. F vs an automobile after his license had been revoked DRIVING DRUNK : jLonzo Smith and during the time that his license was revoked and No. 1394 C . d Ce before said license had been restored also for State cnvinus reckless driving at the same time and place, these ve two cases are consolidated for judgment: Frank N Moore It is the judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell Count : for a period of SIX MONTHS to be assigned to work — ae we under the supervision of tne State Highway and Public cate works Comission. And it is respectfully requested ip ve Sh ii that the Motor Vehicles Bureau indefinitely suspend ete shoema his license to operate a motor vehicle in N, C, Yo aa? a No. 1449 POSSESS LIQUOR No. 1504 TRANSPORTING State Continued State The defendant having entered a plea of nolo con- vs tendere to the unlawful possession and unlawful “Ralph Shue SE BmOpSeNeseaD of intoxicating liquor, — _ ourt having imposed judgment on said plea o SSESS SALE TWELVE MONTHS in jail and assigned to work under me, i099 _ eta the supervision of the State Highway and Public ave Works Comission, the defendant moves to set aside laaek < cena | Said judgment as being harsh, cruel and unusual ‘Clayton Camp punishment. motion denied. ee ee and to the pronouncement of juigment the defendan EN excepts and in open court gives notice of appeal oo I a tae to the Supreme Court. Further mernee yo ss a By consent the defendant is allowe . which to make up and serve statement of case Clarence Lowell Lytle, Jr . ap,eal and the State allowed _ days — : t t = excepti , . 7 ’ : VEAPU kppead bond fixed in the um of $100-00 and the "an ! ee) se Same is adjudged sufficient. Appearance bond nd ve fixed in the sum of $5000.00, to be justified a ~~ approved by the Ulerk of this Court. vs James (Pete) Shoemaker ea r P \ ; N No. 1521 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY "ae Se ontinued a = The Defendant enters a plea off meee: jud gnent vs . n the count for teaking and entering \W mone a Williauws of the court is that the defendant be confined Walt Coffer m2 in the Comson Jail of Iredell County for a der ferses of SIX MONTHS to be assigned to Wor ie “te” he supervision of the State Highway and Pu osate Works Commission, of On — — for larceny “3 cow of the Court more than $100.00, it is the judgmen wiT , WE that the defendant be confined in the State Cousee? No. 1525 ae Prison at hard labor to wear stripes for ot Pe State Sapnionee than TWO nor more than THREE YEARS. The pes ¢ vs Sentence on this count is suspended for 4 Pe the Walt Coffer FIVE YEARS from the rising of the Court upom expressed conditions: d not 1. Tat he be of general good pehavior an Violate any of the laws of the State. ¢ 2. That he work regularly at some gaint’ Ta tion and support and maintain his wife an (Continued on page401) ~- ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued vs Walt Coffer IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ) 0 IN THE SUPERIOR CO FIRST WEEK oon MAY Tea 1951 FIRST WEEK en-- MAY TERN 1951 ursday, May 24, 1951 Friday, May 25, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourment on Friday Morning, May 25, 1951. No. 1492 TRANSPORTING & POSSESSING NON-TAX p - AID Liou State Continued for the State QUOR - No. 1350 MANSLAUGHTER vs State At the close of all the evidence the defendant J Bruce Howell vs withdraws his plea of not guilty and tenders a YJohn Price Sherrill | plea of guilty of involuntary manslaughter, which -32 plea the State accepts, Prayer for judgment is continued for TWO YEARS and the defendant is placed on probation. That as special conditions of probation ordered by the court, the defendant shall: Not drive a motor vehicle upon any public street or highway during the period of probation. No. 1481 } TRANSPOXTING & POSSESSING NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR: State It is ordered by the Court that an Instanter Capias issue for the defendant in this case. vs Meorge Fraley Mahaffey | No. 1402 SCI FA ON BOND State It is ordered that the judgment be made absolute vs on the bond to be discharged upon payment of $100.00 {Samuel Asbury Reavis and cost. No. 1409 SCI FA ON BUND State It is ordered that the judgment be made absolute vs on the bond to be discharged upon payment of the /Henry Edward Pegram cost of sci fa. No. 1457 SCI FA ON BOND State vs /Paul Revere Plyler It is ordered that the judgment be made absolute on the bond to be discharged upon payment of the cost. Thi | ah _ ‘+S Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, Ma 25 1951 O- ~ + 4 ; Y “oy ADd4y at 9:30 ofclock, ( This Honorable Court takes a recess until londay l.orning, ! “ay 28, 1951, at 10:00 O'clockés JUUGE PRESIDING JUVGE PRESIUING In ‘He SUPERIUR COUR SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL CUUNTY MAY TERM, 1951 Be it rewembered that a Superior Vourt began and held in and for the County and State aforesaid, on this the 28th day of May, 1951, at 10:00 O8Clock A. M., when and where His Honor F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding and Holding Vourt for the Fifteenth Judicial District may Tern, 1951 is present and presiding. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names oi tne following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this the Second Week- May Term, 1951 Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit; R. L. Gilliam B. A.Ruth R. L. Gilbert James B, Ellis C. b. Etchison i. G. Alexander T. J. Troutman George Daniels J. T. Xupard Mrs., J. H. Weston Z. V. Williams T. T. Crater Sam L. Ostwalt We. G. Padgett, W. UD. Morrison A. H. Copeland we P, Conger urse Rk. A, Lowery Andrew H. Plyler J. B. Crawford Hush L. Guy. urs. Esther Hau. Goodnignt. Mrs. E. G. Gaither B. W. Barger dr, ve Be Brown Richard H. Urouch Unarles R. Rednian, Robpert P, Cline Russell G. Hanson Ralph Spencer Huch L. Guy was not returned Russell G. Hanson was excused by the Court. W. G. Padgett was excused by the Court urs. osther Ham Goodnisht was execused by Voctor's certiricate vharjes x. Rediian was not returned Jauwes 5. Ellis was noo returned The following men and women constitute wnat snall hereinaiter be terwed as the Vivorce Jury fl, to-wit: R. L. Gilliam, ©. B. Etmison, tbe UStwalt, W. P. Conger, C. E. Brown, 5. A. Ruth, J. H. Weeton, iirs. R. A, Lowery, Ricnard H. Crouch and Elmina mills Yount VIVORC af , anell The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and emp ” answers the issues suomitted to it as follows: Eugene , Yount, Jr. NORTH C AROLI: A F IN THE SUPEXLOR COURT TitevUeLL VUUNTY blmina ills Yount, Plaintiff vs. Hugene Me Yount, Jr., Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT SECOND WEEK === MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 28, 1951 1 Has the Plaintiff been a bona fide resident ot'the State ot North Carolina for at least six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer:___YeS_ 2, Were the Plaintiff and the Defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer:_ YeS 3. Have the Plaintiff and the Defendant lived separate ana apart from each other for two years prior to the institution of this action? I iia NORTH CAROLINA THe oUPerLOR COURT IREVELL CUUNTY Elmina Mills Yount Plaintiff ve JUDGMENT _ Eugene i:. Yount, die, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard ana bein neara before als honor —— er ia el aa 1 a jury ¢ ay Term of the ¥, Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding and a jury at hay serm OL 2 2 | C rand it appeari he Court that the Superior Court ot Iredell County, ana it appearin tt as me and 1 tollowins issues defendant has been personally served wits ana vue Loliowing 15S Navine been Ssuomitted anu answered oy sntiff been a ona fide resident o1 the State of 1. Has tue plaintiff been a oona fic 206 North Carolina for at least six months next precedin» the institutionad this action? Answer: Yes ; ~ 3 + . fy) ) Ley arr] as lies 2. Were the vlaintiff and «he defendant lawfully married as alle;ed in the complaint? Answer: Yew _ seed ee - the fend: ived separate | apart from 3. Have the plaintiff and tie defenaant livec : er for two years prior to the institution of tnis action: Answer: _Yes _ sa ae ed. adjudred and decreed that the plaintiff, ’ “ Now, therefore, it is order is i gs oes an absolute divorce iro: tne Elmina mills Yount, be and sne is hereby ranted an abs : . + tue bonds of matrimony heretoiore defendant, Eurene m. Yount, Jr., and that tae bonds o1 and issolved. existine between tne plaintiff and the defendant be and they are nereby disso Tais 26 day of liay, 1951. F. Donald Phillips Judge Presiding, May term, Superior Court, Iredeil County He ae ae ae Ne sea ae ea a Be Re a a NEN NEO eFC HO In the Superior Court Second Week --=- May Term, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 No. 5014 DIVORCE oséphine A, Alexander The Vivoree Jury #1" empanelled answers the i Vs. as follows: being duly Sworn and ssues submitted to it Joseph L, Alexander NOATH CAROLINA IN THis SUPHKIOR CUURT IREDELL GOUNTY Josephine A, Alexander -VSe Joseph L, Alexander L. Were the Plaintiff ana defendant married, as allered in the vomplaint? Answer, defendant lived separate and apart from next preceding tne commencement of this action? Yes ne plaintirr been a resident oi Iredell County for siz preceding the com.encement ot this Answer, North varolina In the superior Court Iredell County hay Term, 1951. Josennine Joseph L, ‘nis cause coin to ve meard before the undersigned Judge holdin ne re-ular term ot Iredeil Superior Vourt and a .ury, and tle : . snes ff Jury .cvine answered the submitted to tnem in favor of tne plaintiff Y ang amainst the dete ears in the record; ered and ac ; ‘ea ti t 12 OU ondas eilcu Mu augur Ou - : i. ’ be ne plaintiff and tne deiendant 06, : ° f° de a d ire uereby dissolved ana set aside and the plaintil is grante aosolute divorce fron the detendant, 1 or ' intiff is a ft ne court Lurtuer iinds atter due inouiry thas the plaintill 4 Suitable person to have the care, custody, and control of the minor child, Sauwuel alexand t is > i ’ uel alexander, I+t is, therefore, orderea, au judged I care us a Ae the » CUS.Ody, and control be awarded to her, ; + this actiol , that tne plaintiff pay the costs ol this 4 i, Donald Phillips ——~ Judfe Presiding. ana decreed IN THs SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-= MAY Tiwi, 1952 Monday, May 28, 1951 Noe 5016 Bleanor Watts Adaus DIVORCE mn The Uivorce Jury ;1" beins duly sworn and vs empanelled answers tne issues suvmitted to it as Lrollows: NORTH CanOLINA IN THE SUPENLOX COURT IREVSLL COUNTY ELEANOd WATS AUNAS Plaintiff Vo. JHARLEO AU: wid 9 Detendant were the plaintiff » = che shld ee cude 440 —_—- Have the plaintifr and te defenaant ceen lived separately a+ and apart for two years immediately preceding the institution oi this action. Have tne plaintiit lorth Unsrolina ror six Liv vd it $ Lio <attesemnme=eoeannion ~ LINA Uli rt ALLO AU PhAgw i Li ut belore " Vonald resi iins, and é : ry at ie i ; ,erm euperior Court of Iredell County, and defendant as been personal] y serveu wi i rocess, faving been submitted to and answered by the jury: ani l. were the vlaintiff andsefendant married Aaa t * . ANSWER: YES~« intiff fendant been separated 24 ‘ved separately 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant’ | ee ‘ , the institution of this aciion? “Ad apart for two years ediately preccd.n ie instituti u ANGUER: TEGe » ets 5 sen resid s of the State of 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant been residents of tie ot 4 he insti i f this ‘orth varolina for six months immediately precedin; the institution o 1 action? ANSWER: YES. ep ae ee yt gS So IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WakK ee= MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 NOW TUEAEFORL, on motion of Zeb \. Long, Jr., Attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered, aijud;ed and decreed that the plaintife, Sleanor Watts Adams, be and she is .ereby granted an avsolute ivorce from the defendant, Charles Adams, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff anithe defendant be And it is furtner ordered that the plaintiff pay tne costs action t 2 taxed by the Clerk, nis 2itn day of i.ay, 1951. ’. Jonald Phillips Juace Presiding JIVORCE The Divorce Jury 1" bein; duly sworn and empanelled answers tie issues submitted to it as follows: nobert .. Hahaf: OED 7 4 y OUPrhbAaALoad s;OURT Ratha Lunsford ..ahairey, Plaintiff bona fide resident of tie State of orth Carolin : ; a jek stitution of this action: married as alleged iant cor. it adultery as all d in the Complaint? Yes a IN THO SUEBIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ee= MaY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Ratha Lunsford uahaffey, a” Plaintiff Vs. PUOGHENT obert J. Mahaffey, ' Defendant ee ee a eT This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor : Pp + > c © r a “rT Uf } r i’ h #, Donald Phillips. Judge Presidins, and a jury a\ the ay teri ol the > Superior vourt or Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the defendant has been personally served with process and tne following issues having been submitted and answered oy the jury: 1. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of North Caroling for at least six months next precedin: tne institution of this action? Answer: Yes 2 were the pleintiff and the defendant lawfully married as allered ~e@ in the complaint? answer: Yes , ie si iat ee oa — 3. Did the defendant commit adultery as allered in the complaint? Answer: Yes ! i: is order judced < jecre shat the plaintif! Now, therefore, i. is ordered, adjudced and decreed that pla ‘ } : + noner copont ca) © nhsoli di Pr ; Ratha Lunsford Mahaffey, be end she is nereby granted an absolute divorce trom : and f matrim heretofore the defendant, Nobert J. Mahaffey, and of matrimony existin: between the vlaintiff and tne defendant oe and they are hereby dissolved. This 2& day of may, 1951. r, Dordd Phillips vudge Presiding, Superior Court, 4 No. 5069 RUE | orthe Nivoree Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelied Lois C, Drye, | vs ; answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Floyd L, Urye, ST, Ti F nen TT y ¥ Al OU NORTH vAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL LOIS c. URYE, PLAINTIFF, FLUYD L, DRYE, DEFENDANT, | VS. | | - "es 7 mar, Aaoaa | ef ed in the 1. Were plaintiff and the said defendant lawfully morried es glleg Complaint? Answer: Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WELK «--- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident ot the State of North Carolina for a period of six months next preceding the filing of this action? fnmswer: ___ Yes __ 3. Have plaintiff and the said defendant lived Separate and apart for a period of two years next preceding the filing of this Complaint and the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA MN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF ITREDsLL LUIS Ge URYE, Plaintiff, vs. JUDGMENT FLOYD L. DRYE, Vefendant, This matter having been brought on for trial before the Court and Jury this day at a recular Term of the Court, and it appearing from the files and records of the Court that the defendant has been served personally with the summons and complaint as required by law, and the defendant hasfiled no answer within the time required by law, and the following issues havine been suomitted to the Jury and all answered in the arfirmative: 1. Were plaintiff and the said defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. the plaintiff been a resident and citizen of tne State of North Varolina for a period of six (6) months next precedinys the filing of tne complaint and the brinrin of this action? Answer: Yes. 3+ Have plaintiff and the said defendant lived separate and apart for a period ot two (2) years next preceding the filing of the complaint ana tne brining of this action? Answer: Yes. Now therefore, on motion o. Bernard W. Cruse, the counsel for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudred, and decreed that the plaintiff be, and she is nereoy granted a jud;ment of aosolute divorce from tue defend: 2rein. and ; ‘ erenaant “erein, and tne bonds of matrimony heretofore existing ate a ° 1] between the parties are hereby dissolved, and the parties are freed from 4 their obligatio yt i i gations because of tneir marriae accordingly. This the 2°th day of may, A. D., 1951. KF, Donald Philips ee udge of the Superior vov FEAR AI ERE BR BK Me a CH ee a Ea a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ----- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 No. 5022 V becca P. Fesperman DIVORCE Re The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn vs and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Troy E. Fesperman North Carolina In the dSuperior Court Iredell County Rebecca P. Fesperman " ISSUES Troy &. Fesperman 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next precedine the institution of this action? Answer: Yes 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Were tne plaintiff and defendant separated, and have tney lived separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes North Carolina In tne Su;erior court Iredell County Rebecca P, Fesperman | vs ! Troy E, Fesperman | This cause coming on to be heard before Honoraole fF. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding over tne May vivil Term 1951 Iredell County Superior Court, and being heard before said i norable F. Donald Phillips, and a Jury, the following issues were submitted to tue Jury: l. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the S,ate olf Nortn Carolina : insti j his ? for more than six months next preceding t.e institution of this action 2. Were the plaintiff ana defendant married as alleged in tne Complaint? 3. Were the plaintiff and defendant separated, and have they lived separate and apart comtinuously for two years next preceding the institution of this action? The Jury having answered all of said issues "Yeu". Ir is, therefore, by the Court ordercd, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existinr between the plaintiff and the defendant be forever dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted a divorce @ vinculo from the defendant, Troy 4. Fesperman, and that the cost of this action be taxed arainst the plaintiff by the Clerk. ». Donald Phill sea Be ne Xe ic He ae a eH NE Judge pea ring Me ae ae Se ae ae ae I a me Hee A IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «=< MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 No. 5026 Ruby S. Plyler, DIVORCE The Divorce dury #1" being duly sworn and VS. empamelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Paul Plyler NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPEXIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1951 Ruby S. Plyler, Vs. ISSUES Paul Plyler 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as allered in tne complaint? Answer:_ Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each otuer, an nave they lived separate and apart from each ovher for more than two years continuously prior to tue institution oi this action? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a vonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months prior to the coruencement of ths action? Answer Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREVELL CUUNT MAY TEAM, 1951 Ruby S,. Plyler, vs. JUDGMENT Baul Plyler This cause coming on to be neard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Nortn Carolina, vefore, His honor, Vonald Phillips, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury naving answered the issues submitted to it by tne Court in favor oi the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court th.t tne bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Ruby S. Plyler and the defendant, Paul Plyler be, ana the sawe are dissolved, and the plaintiff is eranted an avsolute divorce from the defendant. F, Donala Phillips Judse Presiding NERC He ea ae ae ae ae ae aca ae ac aca mee ae ae ae alent /NOKTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --= MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1951 S. Plyler Ruby “+ "plaintiff ORDER FW R CUSTODY Vs. . OF mINOR CHILD ul Plyler " . Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard vy His Honor H, Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding at the May Term, 1951, Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court and tne Court finding as a fact: 1. That one minor child, namely, James Allen Plyler, was born to the union of Ruby S. Plyler and Paul Revere Plyler, said child now beins 6 years of age. 2. That said minor child is now living with his mother, the plaintiff, and that said child has lived with his mother ever since the plaintiff and the defendant separated on or about say 5th, 194€, and that during said time the defendant, Paul Revere Plyler, has contributed nothing for the support and maintenance of said child, and that said child has been wholly supported am maintained by its mother, Ruby 3S. Plyler. 3. The Court further finds as a fact tuat Ruby S. Plyler, the mother of the child is a fit and suitable person to nave the custody and control of Said minor child, and that tne best interest ol said child would be served by the child being in the control or tne mwotuer at this time, Ii IS THsREFORE, ORDikRnD, ADJUUGsD ANU DVEURLED: 1. That mrs. Ruby S. Plyler, tne pjaintiff, mother of the minor child be, and she is hereby granted the custody and control ot tne minor child, James Allen Plyler. 2. That the plaintiff pay the cost of the proceeding. 3. ‘This cause is retained for turtner orders, including the custody of the child. It further appears to the Vourt tnat the above entitled action was brought by the plaintiff tor an absolute divorce from thé defendant upon the grounds of two years separation, and tnat the defendant filed no answer praying for the custody of the minor child, and that a Jjuagment pranving the Plaintiff an absolute divorce from the defendant has already been entered at this term ot the Iredell County Su erior Court. This the 28th day of May, 1951. F, Donald Phillips “Judge Presiding see ee ee He a a AE HEI HHT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WELK == MAY TERM, 1952 Monday, May 28, 1951 (NO. 5030 G. A. White, Sr., DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and oe empanelled answers the issues sub as follows: —e Mamie White . North Carolina In theSuperior Court Iredell County. G. A. White, Sr., -v- Mawie White. ole Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer:___ Yes ~2= Were the plaintiff ana defendant married to each other, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes -3- Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from eacn other for two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County. May Term, 1951. G. A. White, Sr, } -v- j JUDGMENT. Mamie White, | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, “. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the may Term, 1951, of the Iredell County Superior vourt, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been personally served wita process, and the following issue having been submitied to and answered by the jury: ole Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolim for six montns prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in tn complaint? Answer: "Yes", -2< Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, 48 alleged complaint? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --= MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, }951 Answer: "Yes". =3— Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes". It is, therefore, now ordered, adjudged and decreed that tne plaintiff G. A. White, Sr. be, and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce m the bonds of matrimony with the defendant, ana tuat the said bonds @ fro matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the saue are hereby aosolutely dissolved and set aside. this may 28, 1951. F, Donald Phillips Judge Presiding No. 5038 DIVORCE ne The Divorce Jury/#1" being duly sworn and Vs empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Bessie S. Riddle North Carolina, In The Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1951. Alonzo Riddle ! Vs. j Issues Bessie 5. iiiddle | 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the couplaint? Answer: Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant seperate from each other, and have they lived seperate and apart from each other continuously for more ‘ : k than two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the Complaint? ifide resident of the State ot North 3. Has the plaintiff been a bon prior to the institution of this action, Varolina for more than six months a8 alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes tees IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «== mAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28,. 1951 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1951 Alonzo Riddle Vs. JUDGMENT Bessie S. Riddle This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His tonor, F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and arainst tne defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordéred and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby disolved and declared null and void, and the plaintiff, Alonzo Riddle, is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Bessie S. Riddle, F. Donald Phillips Judge Presiding & RAK DS KIS Ik Bx De aie alc dc d)g ai ah ae aie aie aie jNo. 5043 McRae Raymond Williams DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn Vs. and empanelled answers the issues sub- - mitted to it as follows: Mary Harmon Williaus, NORTh VAMOLINA, IREDELL COUNTY, In the Supérior Court mcRae Raymond Williams, Plaintiff, Vs. Mary Harmon Williams, Defendant, 1. Did the plaintiff, meRae Raymond Williams, and the defendant, mary Harmon Williaus, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes @. Have the plaintiff, McRae Raymond Williams, and the defendant, M ‘ Willi ary Harmon Williams, lived separate and apart from each other for two Consecutive years immediately prior to tue corimencement of this action? ANSWER Yas ‘. 3. Has the plaintiff, mcRae Raymond Williams, been a ‘ona fide resident ot the 3 ’ ' ' ve wtate of North Varolina for twelve montns immediately preceding the commence:ient oi this action? ANSWER_Yes IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT SECUND wask em- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 1951 Rae Raymond Wklliams, . F Plaintiff, = JUDGMEN'T Mary Harmon Williams ” Defendant. ! i i } This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by his Honor F, Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the may Term, 1951, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues having been submitted to, and answered by the jury, to-wit: 1. Did the plaintiff, mcRae Raymond Williaus, and the defendant, Mary Harmon Williaus, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER_ Yes . 2. Have the plaintiff, mcRae Raymond Williams, and the derendant, Mary Harmon Williams, lived separate and apart from each other for two cone s@cutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER_ Yes ° 3. Has the plaintiff, cRae Raymond williams, been a bona fide resident ot the State of North Carolina for twelve months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes . fhe Court finds that the summons in this action was duly served on the defendant, mary Harmon Williams, on the 20tn aay ol April, 1951, by Ralph Marshall, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, orth Carolina, by leaving a copy of the summons, and a copy ofthe complaint with tne defendant. The Court furtuer finds from the affidavit of the plaintitf, that ary : : a aaa Harwon Williams, the defendant, was not, a. the time or tne institution of this action, is now, nor has she been since the institution of this action, in the military service ot the United States o/ America. IT IS, THSREFORE, CONSIDERS), AVJUUGED, ANY UEURUSD, That the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, ant they are dissolved, and that tne plantiff, jcRae Raymond Williams, is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, ary Harmon Williams. Let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff. This the 28th day of May, 1951. F. Donald Phillips Judge Presiding. Neg ER a OR ICI a a AE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «=< MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 Mo. 5044 Mrs. Lois McHargue DIVORCE sty ' The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn Vs. and empanelled answers the issues sy to it as follows: bmitted U. S. mcHargue North Carolina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREVELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1951 Mrs, Lois McHargue, Vs. C. S. meHargue 1. Did the plaintiff ana defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: ___ Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each Otuer, and nave they lived separate and apart from each otser for more tian two years continuously prior to the institution ot this action? Answer: Yes 3- Has tue plointiff been a bonifide resident oi the State of North @arolina for more tnan six months prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: _ Yes — —— ——_ IN ThE SUPE..IOR CUURT . ‘ . WON VAMLULLAA IREDELL COUNTY aY Luiua, 1951 urs. Lois cHarcue, Vs. JUUVDGMENT Ve. S. mcHargue This cause coming on to be ueard and being heard at this term of tne Superior Court ot Iredell vounty, orth Carolina, before, His Honor, F. Vonald !hillips. Judce Presiainr, and a Jury, ana tne Jury having answered te issues submitted to it oy the Vourt in favor ot tae plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in tne record: It is therefore, ordered ana aujudsed vy the Court that tne bonds d matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, mrs, Lois mcHargue ant the defendant, ve Se icHargue be, and the same are dissolved, and the plaintiff is Branted and absolute divorce from the defendant. F., Donald Phillips... Judce Presiding Bi 3 SI RIC aK a ca ale ae ae aca ak ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-= MAY TETm, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 No. 5021 Ruth H. Harris DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn vs. and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: James R. Harris North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. May Term, 1951 Ruth H. Harris Vs. { James R. Harris | 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry eac are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant seperate from each other, and nave they lived seperate andappart from each otner for more than two years prior to the intitution oi this action, as alleged in tne complaint? ANSWER: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident ol the state of North Uarolina for more prior to tne institution ol nn action, as allered in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes North Carolina, In the Surerior vourt Iredell County. May Term, 1951. Ruth H. Harris, Vs. I Jaues R, Harris, I j i t ieard his This cause coming on t neard at thi , ’ f Iredell Count: ‘orth Carolin before iis Term of the Superior Court of ireaeii Lountly, 01 ro re ™ « > sn 2 1 Sadaine an a Jury ana i jury havin fonor, F, Jonald Philips, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, a the jury gz ’ > 4 avor he nilaint3 answered the issues submitted to it by the vourt in .avor Oi the plaintiff and arainst the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Vourt that the . Seti aintiff, Ruth H. Harris conds of matrimony heretofoie existing between the plaint ’ . ’ and the defendant, James R. Harris, 0 and the sauwe are disolved and set aside, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. The Court further finds as a fact that tne plaintiff, Ruth i ital r particular to have the is Harris, is a fit and suitable person in ever) particul . -his marriare between the Care and custody of the tnree ciildren born of th Plaintiff and defendant. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the custody of said cladldren be, and the same is hereby granted IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 to the plaintiff, she to have the care and custody of Said child ren, This cause as to the care and custody of the children is retained a e for further orders of the court. F,. Vonald Phillips Juare Presiding ig HEDIS DK DHE I} BK DHE AK BIE DIE DIK YE AE 3,5 24s 3)< 2) OY aie Bic ake ai Mio. 5066 Robert Lee Burr, By His Next Friend, UIVORCE Fannie Virginia Burr The Divorce Jury #1" heing du . sworn and empaneiled answers the. Ss issues submitted to it as folloys: Hllen Frances slack Burr NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUP : pares - i N ink SoU Pi RIOK C )U CABARRUS COUNTY sie KUBERT Lit sURR, BY NEXT FRIEND FANNI# VIRGINIA BURR PLAINTIFF ? VS. ELLEN FRANCES BLACK BURR DEF bis VANT 1. Were tne plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer yes 2 Has ti "end : eis : _.. Has the defendant committed adultery as alleged in the Complaint? E; Answer 7 _——Agq—_____ H >. S v as the ninintiff heen a resident of the “tote of “orth” oro) ina C tinno ¢ ont none) or a neriod of more than ety morths next nrecedine the instityntsan at this netton: = Anewer——— ZS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ---- MAY TERM, 1951 Monday, May 28, 1951 |No., 503 State 0. North Carolina In the Superior Court County of Iredell Clifton H. Ross, Jr., by his next friend, Frederick Chamblee * Plaintiff, vs JUDGMENT Wiley H. Crouse and wife, lie Cami D. Crouse, Defendants. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding and holding the May 21, 1951 Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carelina, and it appearing to theCourt that the parties have agreed upon a settlement by way of compromise of all matters in controversy existing between them upon the agreement of the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $1,250.00 and the costs; It further appearing that the case was regularly calendared for trial, and the Court, upon & hearing and examination of witness in open court in term time, particular inquiry being made as to the nature of the injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff and the probable liability of the defendant, finds as a fact that the settle- ment offered is a fair and equ&table one and its acceptance is for the best interest of the minor pldatiff. WHEREFORE, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the deferants the sum of $1,250.00 and the costs of this action as taxed by theClerk. This the 28th day of May, 1951. F, Donald Phillips CONSENT: ederick G. Chamblee ext friend of minor plaintiff. A. B. See Attorney for plaint . Attorney for defendant. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 195) Monday, mut ¥ 28, 1951 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Clifton H. Ross, Jr, by his Next friend, Fredrick Ghamblee, ( Plaintiff vs ORDER Wiley H. Crouse and wife, Camille D. Crouse, Defendants It appearing to the Court, that A. B, Raymer, Counsel duly employed by the above named plaintiff has prosecuted the 1 cause of said plaintiff to a successful determination and has recovered for the benefit of said Plaintiff, the sum approved by this Court, and the Court finding as a fact that the services rendered by the Counsel in behalf of Said plaintiff were reasonably warth the sum of $250.00. It is, therefore, ordered that the Clerk of this Court pay to said Counsel in full of services rendered by him in behalf of said Plaintiff, the sum of $250.00 out of the moneys Paid into his office in Satisfaction of the Judgment entered in this cause. It further appearing to theCourt that medical expenses amounting to $258.00 were incurred for the benefit of the plaintiff in connection with treatment of the injuries described in the complaint # in this action; it is, therefore, ordered that the Clerk of this Court pay for suid medical expense in the amount of $254.00 out of the moneys paid into his office in satisfaction of the F, Donald Phillips Judge Prestdine Fee eee eee ee ee HOD judgment entered in this cause, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK === MAY TERM, 195) Monday, May 2%, 195) Agar Cerouzma IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY » Nova B. Fowler | 53 Plaintiff ’ Vs. ' JUDGMENT tlantic Company, Incorporated trading locally as the Fredell Ice () ee ome : This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the May Term 195] of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina; and the plaintiff having introduced her evidence and rested her Case, and the defendant having thereupon moved for a Judgment as in case of non-esuit and the court being of the opinion that such motion ought to be allowed, Now, therere, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed tht the plaintiff be and she is hereby non-suited and that the Said cause be and it is hereby dismissed and that the defendant recover of the plaintiff the cost of this action to be taxed by the clerk, This the 28th day of May, 195}. F, Donald Philli Judge Presid! ng RE RO ee OR OR oe 4906 William B McGraw vs Mildred Nants McGraw ----------- - Continued /OL2 Elva Base ve Frank Base conccocccenccccccccccccscese= Cont inued 3045 Allan F Campbell vs Lena 0 Camppell ----------------- Contigued 4762 WW Goodrum vs Vera Loretta Goodrum -------------- ~--Conti nued 4833 Mrs Eula B Parker vs Allen Edminston ----------- ~--~=Continued This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, — May 29th, 1951, FF bint (ely —~Todge Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1951 Y No NOgtH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT A. Kieth Shealey, Jury sworn and enpanelled as follows: Plaintiff, Andrew H Pagace, C. B. E*chison, George )Crater, A. H. Copeland, J. B. Crawford, B vs. Robert P. Cline, J. C. Alexander, R. L, Gilbert e James E. Campbell, Defendat. ISSUES 1. Was the plaintiff's automobile damaged by the igence defendant, as alleged in the complaint? nelig of the Answer: Yes. 2. Did the plaintiff by his own hegligence contribute to his damage, as alleged in the answer? Answer: Yes 3. What damages, if any is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: North Carolina Iredell County A Keith Shealy I In the Superior Court vs I JUDGMENT James E. Campbell ] This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable F. Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding over the May Civil Term 1951 Iredell County Superior Court, and being heard before said Honorable F. Donald Phillips, and a jury, the following issvwes were submitted to the Jury: 1. Was the plaintiff's automobile damaged by the hegligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? 2. Did the pleintiff by his own negligence contribute to his damage, as alleged in the answer? 3. What damages, if any, is th titled to recover of the defendant ? ges, Y» e plaintiff en The jury having answered the first issue "Yes" and the secone issue "Yex", It is therefore, by the Court ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover nothing from the defendant in this action, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff by theClerk,. F. Donald Phillips. _._— udge Presiding OR ROK tok sett tom fot te pete foto tee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1951 Tuesday, May 29, 1951 O0o 5002 Anta CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Fannie Houpe and Hilliard 8S. Byers yor?” plaintiffs VSe Josephine Freeman Summers, James Freeman, Victoria ISSUES Freeman, Ruth Freeman, ee and Mamie Freeman, Defendants 1. Is the real property dewcribed in the Complaint located in Iredell County? Answer: Yes 2. Did C. L. Freeman and wife, Josephine Freeman, convey the real property described in the Complaint to Hilliard S. Byers as alleged? Answer: Yes 3. Was the deed from C. L. Freeman and wife, Josephine Freeman, to Hilliard S. Byers for the real property described in the Complaint lost and never recorded? Answer: Yes 4. Have Fannie Houpe and her predecessor in title, Hilliard S. Byers, been in possession of the rea} property described in the Complaint under known and visible lines and boundaries adversley to all other persons for twanty years? Answer: Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Fannie Houpe and Hilliard S. Byers, Plaintiffs Vs. Josephine Freeman Summe 5, James Freeman, Victoria Freeman, Ruth Freeman, ami Mamie Freeman, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor F, Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding at the May Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant, Josephine Freeman Summers has been personally served by been properly served with filed and that the time summons and that the other defendants hav@ Summons by publication and that no answer was and whereas the following issues have been for answering has expired; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM) 1951 Tuesday, May 29, 1951 submitted to and answered by the jury as follows: 1. Is the real property described in the Complaint located in Iredell County? Answer: Yes. : 2. Did C. L. Freeman and wife, Josephine Freeman, convey the real property described in the complaint to Hilliard S. Byers as alleged? Answer: Yes. 3. Was thedeed from C. L. Freeman and wife, Josephine Freeman, to Hilliard S. Byers for the real property described in the complaint lost and never recorded? Answer: Yes. 4. Have Fannie Houpe and her predecessor in title, Hilliard S. Byers, been in possession of the real property described in the canplaint under known and visible lines and boundaries adversely to all other persons for twenty years? Answer: Yes. Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Fannie Houpe, is the owner of the property described in the Gomplaint free and discharged from any interest of the defendants, and that the plaintiff is entitled to the pessession of the said property. This 29 day of May, 1951. F. Donald Phillips ge Presiding. st ok fog tok fog Rote ok ge tote ee go ak AO 5066 Hit tTH 4 wtOLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN i His WV bnLOr UUURT xobert Lee Burr, By His Next friend, Fannie Virginia burr, Plaintiff ick Burr Vefendant m4 ° . : $094 and This cause cominrs on to be ieard before the undersigned juage jury at the term above mentioned and being heard, and the jury having returned a verdict t the answers to issues set out in the record, finding that the plaintiff and the defendant were married as alleged in the complaint; that the defendant did commit adultery as alleged in ~ hat the plaintiff has been a resident of the state of the institution complaint; and North Carolina for more than six months next preceedin; of this action, r It is therefore, on motion of Bedford W. Black, Attorney f° the plaintiff, ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be ani he is hereby granted an absolute divorcee from the defendant on the srounds of adultrv. (Continued on bottom of page 427) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- MAY TERM, 1951 Tuesday, May 29, 1951 N. Sankey Gaither, T/A Harmony Milling Co et al vs Claude Wheeler, Inc and The Traveler's Indemnity Co a COrp wn nnn nnn nnn nnn enn ee ------ ~~ -- eee ene------ Continued In the Matter of the Probate in Solemn Form of Todd A Summers’ Will ------ wee ene e nen ----~- no Continued Joe D Raymer vs Thomas W Griffin & Mrs Griffin -------Continued C A Mayhew vs Sam Mayhew ---------------------------- -Continued Rachel Christenburry vs Travis Carpenter - o------Continued Travis 6arpenter vs M F Crouch, T/A Crouch Taxie Co --Continued Raymond Simalton BNF Frank B Simalton vs Gilbert “arabia- Continued Thomas F McKay vs James E Gilleland ------------ ------Continued WT Fullbright vs Maude Chapman Fullbright ----------- Continued Mittie L Clark, Ammx of Samuel Franklin Clark vs Stanford Loweli Lambreth «<<< << «<<-<<--<--0-<-<2----"" Continued Vance McBride vs William M Herrin --------<------<------ Cont inued fo ARES BE A RR aie a ae 3 (Continued from page 426) It appearing to the court that the said child, |.ichael Dale Lurr was born to another. Tt 4s hereby ordered, a ju l, ea iad decreed that tne ne; 1ster of Deeds of Cabarrus Countv change the name of the fat.er of said child from Robert Lee Burr to unknown and the child is ereby declared illeritimate. It appearing to the court that the plaintiff in this action, obert Lee Burn, is a member of the armed forces of the United States stationed in Austria and that he will be out of the sontinental limits of the United States for andther 18 months and that the custody of the said child, Della Virginia 5 . : . P i ene 4 r nti a Burr, will not be decided at this term of court but is left open until vhe plaintiff returns to the continental limits of tle United States or for a period of 18 months, whichever time even with the plaintiff still out of the continental limits of the United States if it can be Ssiown through his next friend Frannie Virginia Burr or any other person that the mother of the said child, Ellen Frances r ° ™ 14 5 i h ] a Black Burr, is not fit person and is not using the moneys placed in her hands for the proper support of the said Della Virginia -urv. Let the plaintiff pay tle costs in this action. Done this the 28th day of May, 1951. F, Donald Phillips ¥.” Donald Phillips, Judge Presiding. koe em mR Km Oe 429 | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His H ; y oe Duly verified complaint on October 4, 1950, wherein it is stated that Vonald Phillips, Judge Presiding at the ay term of tne Supe : iota a : J a ee oe the Defendants therein named are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum ee mY ie | | No. 4995 i ie ’ Pun Qippr No. 4946 a 7 NORTH CAXOLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COUR NORTH CAROLINA In The Superior Court hl ‘ Ce ie TReVELL WUNTY MAY TERM, 1951 IREDELL COUNTY Before the Clerk ee | | F 1 P : J. W. Baity Her n. W. Davis, Jr. and H. W. Sloop t Rll Plaintiff D/B/A Davis Supply Company iia) i | ** MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BY Vi i | vs ZUNBGNENT Vs. | DEFAULT FINAL nl tea a Richard (Junior} Caupvell Jack Howard and wife, Daisy P. Howard | ea i Defendant 4oK ‘ie Hi | } wk : Whereas the plaintiffs in the above entitled action filed a ie | of $269.06, representing a balance due for materials furnished the | Iredell County, upon tne demurrer oft the defendant for that the complaint | does not state facts sufficient t» constitute a cause otf action against Defendants; that tne said amount has become a stated account; That the . Defendants were properly served with summons on Decenber 4, 1950; That | | | , | the det'endant, in that: (1) Proper facts have not been stated to allege | : a a cause oi action against tne defendant, tne allegations being mere more than 30 days have elapsed since the serving of said sum.ons and the Ml ii am erat: | Hy conclusions oi tne pleader, the plaintifr; ana (2) the allegations o1 the defendants have failed to file an answer, {4 | WM er ' 4 inti ir attorney of Record a complaint constitute a efective cause of action gainst the @fendant, the Nor therefore, the plaintiffs, throu;h their y ’ ’ | iu | cause of action allered being an action of mary Magdeline Raity against pray the Court for a judgment afainst tue defendants in the sum of $209.06 hi i i ; j ix 3 er annum from iarch 8, 1950 i this defendant, but certaily no action is alleged py the plaintiff arainst with interest at the rate of six per cent p ' ’ the defendant; and (3) this plaintiff attempts to allege as his action a cause of until paid. William BR. Pope | action wnich it true, which is aenied, would only constitute an action Attorney for plaintiffs @OLENXIL XR KMALXUAKEKXKEXMaKiady xumMkaxmnixxamn of his dauchter against y laa iad the defendant, out not in any way, veing or allecing a cause oi action by ; : NORTH CAKXOLINA In the Superior Vourt the plaintili arainst tne defendant. he © IREDELL COUNTY Rateee the fae Now, therefore, it is ordered, aa‘udged, and decreed that said R. W. Davis, Jr. and H. W. Sloop dewur er be and tue saue is nereby overruled. i D/B/A Davis Supply Company s . M ' 3 ’ , A 7 This _____day of 4 ake vs. JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINA f. Donald Philips Jack Howard and wife, Daisy P. Howard Judge Presiding This cause comins on to be heard and bein heard by the Honorable C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court ot Iredell Vointy, and it appearing that tne plaintiffs in tne above entitled action filed a duly 1950, wherein it is stated that the wm Me hm me me Ok oe ok me kc kok verified complaint on October 4, Vefendants therein named are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum a $209.06, representing a balance due for materials furnished tie Defendant s; That the said amount has become a stated account; Tsat the Defendants were Tt nave Properly served with summons on December 4, 1950; ‘That more than 30 days | elapsed since the servine of said summons anda the defendants have failed to file an answer, it is tnerefore ordered, adjudged and degreed that the in the sum of $269.06, and that Vefendants are endebted to the plaintiffs defendants together with interest paid. the same be paid to the plaintiffs by the at the rate of six per cent per annum from March &, 1950 until This the 22 day of may, 1951. 10:30 A. m, . me eae ae eee CM AME gegetetere totem tee Nea gee A? ti { i H 4 \ } i | q / /No. 5046 NORTH CAROLINA il | In THE SUPERLOR CUURT IREDELL CUUNTY mea Statesville Plywood me and Veneer Company em Plaintiff em vs ” JUDGMENT Morrison-Lael Fixture *e% Corporation eK Defendant aK This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, Carl G, Smith, Clerk of the Su:erior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment arsainst the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the court tuat a verified complaint was filed and sunmons issued in this action on tne 19ti day of April, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that said summons to- gether with a copy of said cowplaint were served on the defandant on the 2lst day of April, 1951; And it further appearing to the courtthat no answer, demurrer, or other pleadins nas been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings nas been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it furtner appearin= to the Court from the verified com- plaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $2,247.50 dollars with interest thereon from the lst day of April 1950; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudred, and décreed that the plaintiff have and recover oi the defendant the sum of’ $2,247.50 dollars, with interest thereon trom the lst day of April, 1950, and the costs of this action, This 23rd day of may, 1951, CG. G. Smith mee Clerk of the Superior Court TRIER He Hee He He ese Me sete He te se se Hee Mee ae see ese Hee Heke ae Oe AROLINA In the Superior Court TREDELL COUNTY Before the Clerk Jack Robinson | “. | 1 = JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NUN-SUIT * Joseph Alexander Barber ! This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County and whereas it appears that the matters and things in controversy in the above entitled action have been settled and agreed upon by and between the parties to said action. j ; he plaintiff ; Now therefore, upon motion ol councel for the ; fm a e + S110 , tar it is ordered, adjudged, and edereed tht a judgment of volun Y) and is hereby entered in the avove entitled action. This the 29th day of may, 1951. C. G. Smith Ulerk Superior Court We consent; William R., Pope Attorney for Plaintiff Jonn C, Kesh Attorney for defendant mk wk KK OK OK me ue Ke x Yo. 5057 NORTH CAROLINA IN TH SUP£nIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY GmENT Peoples Loan & Savings Bank, JuDGH Inc. of Statesville, North Capolina, and W. C. Current Plaintiffs Vs. Frank L, oharpe Defendant ing before the This cause coming on to be heard, ane being heard : 11 County Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of tue Superior Court of Irede ’ : tatement of the North Carolina, and it appearing to the Vourt a or t, that the attorneys for the plaintiffs and the answer filed by the defendant, t put that the rea defendant was erroneously made a party to this action : appearing defendant is another person by the same name; and it further app ntiffs to the Court from the statements of the attorneys for the plai defendant's and from the answer of the det'endant that an attachment of the ed; and that the plaintiffs have elected to ’ Property was erroneously levi take a nonsuit in their action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the i ; g76 2 i. ’ | i erroneous attachment levied against the ;roperty of the defendant be NORTH CARULINA IN THe SUP“RIOR COURT i} lifted and avoided; and that the plaintiffs be nonguited and be taxed with IREDELL COUNTY | the costs to be charged by the Clerk. 0. L. Lippard and Ernest L. Carson, { ; t/a Modern Electric Company i This 29 day of May, 1951. ; } -vs- ORDER ip | C. G, Smith ie Ulerk of Superior Court The Board of Education of Davie el County, a corporation, (also known Ae i Conpontet 9) as Davie County Board of Education); F. G. Chambl and John R. Hartledge. . * ee | Attorneys for plaintizr Land, Sowers & Avery ' The defendants, Board of Education of Davie Vounty, through its Neil S. Sowers ‘ Kttorney for defendant i / : . ee —_— —_ ane noes ces attorney, A. T. Grant, Esquire; and John k. Hartledge, through his { } ; attorney, Kerr Craige Ramsey, Esquire, before time to answer in tne above ) : proceeding expires, come into Court and move that this cause be dismissed iy : , | | or transferred to Davie County, the residence of the soard of Education . i | mee KK Ke ek we mw me oe me me kk ae : UF A ae i of UVavie County, a municipal corporation. Hl Hi The Court after considering said «otion, and being of tne opinion ft ## 96S f that Iredell County is not tne proper County in whica tuis suit should be | NORTH CAROLINA In THE SUPERIOR COURT i braught, therefore grants said motion and hereby transfers t..is cause to nh IRED“LL COUNTY JUDGMENT #4 ia eek os Gener teers of Davie County, together with all papers ‘ini a " " ie minerva Waddell Allison 5 filed herein tor further proceedings, as provided by law G. S. 1-77. | Vs. This the 2nd. day of June, 1951. Will Tomlin and Annabel Tomlin U. G. smith Tierk o1 ouperior Court This cause coming on to be neard, and being heard before the ; RR oy | Honorayle Carl G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Vourt from the statement of the attorneys for the Plaintiff and tne Det'endant tnat the matters and things in controversy have been set led between tne parties and tnat tne plaintiff has se ¢ & & mw ke OK OK OM mw ok Oe OK OK elected to take a nonsuit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited and the det'endants taxed with the costs to be charged by the VUlerk, This 1 day of June, 1951. UC, G,. Smith Clerk of Superior court Consented to: F, G, Chamblee Attorney for Plaintift R, A, Vollier Attorney for Defendant - woe Kk Ke ek ek | JUDGMENT a’ SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA State Spring Term, 1951 { 1 No, 365 Iredell County, vs Flake Mullis This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon considerati.n whereof, this Court is of opinion that there is no error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable Jeff. D. Johnson, Jr, Jugtice, be certified to the said superior Court, to the intent that’ the proceed ngs be had therein in said cause according to law as declared in said opinion. And it is considered and adjudged further, that the Defendant do pay the costs of tle appeal in this Court incurred, to wit, the sum of Two and 70/100-----------------dollars ($2.70), and execution issue therefor, A TRUE COPY Adrian J. Vanstory Clerk of the Supeme Court. (SEAL) i Filed in the office of the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina on tha 5th day of June, 1951. _ C, G. Smith Clerk Ho. 4998 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPEXIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFGE ‘Ib CLERK J. mM. Schafer Plaintiff vs ORDER (Setting Aside Judrment) John A. Miller and wife, Elaine E. Miller Defendants fhis cause having been heard before the Honorable Uarl G, omith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon Motion ol the defendants to set aside judgment by default final and allow the defendants to answer; And it g@ppearing to the Court from tne Motion, Afitidavits, and testimony of the defendants; that service of summons was not properly had upon the defendants; and that their property was improperly attached by tne plaintif:; and the Court being ot tne opinion that saia motion should be granted in the discretion of the Court; It is now therefore ordered and decreed tnat the judrement by default 435 | final against the defendants and tne order of attachment, for the reason apove a set out, be and tne same is hereby set aside and revoked; and tne defendants are hereby rranted the risht to come in and answer or demur, within the time ES a SR RN = $48 = PBS, td <i = allotted by law. This 5 day of June, 1951. CG. G. smith Clerk ot Suverior Court a i Jo. 4998 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPEXIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY J. M. Schafer I Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. 1 ss : ' John A, Miller and wife, Elaine E, Miller { I ! Defendants This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, to the and it appearin; court tnat no answer has been filed vy tne def- endants and that tne plaintiff taxes a voluntary noneuit of this cause; It is, tnerefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited witnout prejudice and be taxed with the costs to be charred by the Clerk, This 5 dayof June, 1951. CG. Ge Smith Clerk of Superior Court Consented to: R,. A, Collier Attorney for Plaintiff F. CG, Chaublee as Attorney for Plaintiff Se eeeksksee#t & Beeeteetaweks fs wy dO. 5053 NORTH UG AROLINA IN LHe OuUPL ALO CUURT IREVsLL COUNTY Harold &. Holbrook, dr. Plaintiff vS. J UDENENRT A, S. Sparks Defendant This cause coming on to be seard before the Honorable Uarl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Vourt that a verified complaint was filed and sum.ons issued in tiis action on the 25th day of april, 19513 to tne vo and it further appearin; rt that no answer, demurrer, or aas becn filed by une defendant and no extension of time to tile pleadings nas been granted, and thet the tine within which pleadings may be riled as expired; And it curtner appearin; to tue Court irom the veriried couplaint that the cause ot action consists o1 tne ore to pay a sum oi money Lrixed oy tue contract, namely dollars; And it further appearin. to tne vourt trom tir verifiea complaint that the plaintiff claims tne ricat to tue possession oi tue inventory 1 ‘ , re } ey $ + . + + nt 4 0 g stock o: the Holbrook Livestock Supply vompany in tae aiount os 29h o& 5 in order that he may sell tne Same as provided in a certain conditional sales arreeuent executed by tne aefendant, and thereunder now nas whe Same in his possession. cat Now, therefore, it is ordered, @ujuare, plaintiff have and recover ot tne aefendant the 6% ] it to 1 nossession of the said dollars; that ne ve declared entitled to tie | Sessior ad sell the sauwe as by law rovided property, ana tnat he be allowea vo § ; . 2 zs .. ce the al SUS 1 and credit tne amount received therefor, less the “C&S = ‘ ‘ neh ; d nd that the sald Sale, upor:n tne monetary Juaguent nerein renaered, ana bao + sts is action. plaintiff recover of tne defendant the costs o- this actio Tais 7 day of June, 1951. Cc. G. omith Clerk Superior Court At 10:30 A, bie oe ee KH OF xe k * eS —— i hilt ' i j ene poe ee /No. 5028 NORTH CAXOLINA IN YH& SuUPsxlOR COURY TReVDiELL COUN iY Moldply Corporation - Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. Home Made Chak Company Defendant : This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, F. Donald Phillips, Judge tiolding the Courts of the Fifteenth UVistrict, upon demurrer of the defendant for to have certain parts of the plaintiff's complaint stricken as being irrelevant, immaterial and ~re judicial to the defendant; and for tnat the complaint fails to state a cause ot action arainst tne plaintiff: And the court being of tne opinion that sa-d demurrer should be overruled but not acjud:ed as frivolous; Now, tuerefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that said demurrer be and the sane is nereby ovérruled and the defendant is here allowed 30 days in which to answer the plaintiff's complaint. This 11 gay oi June, 1951. 1 | D _ Jats nese the Co rts or fhe Fifteentn Judicial District To the rulin oi t vourt denying motion of Plaintiff for juaguwent on the pleadines as being frivolous and for tne sole purpose oi delay, tne Plaintiff in apt time excepts. vc pa Ff. Donald Phillips Judge Presiding ee SEAN. ® Hug Sere sn nant wilh Re Sota = 2 SE ae yo. 4932 NORTH CAHOLINA IN THE SUPEXLOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY mrs. 5. #. Avery Plaintiff VSe Homes Drug Company, A Corporation Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Varl G, Smith, Clerk ot the Superior Vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statements of tne attorneys for the plaintiff, that tne plaintiff, tnrough her attorneys, has elected totake a nonsuit in her action: It is, therefore, ordered, adjudred, and decreed that the plaintiff tne Clerk. be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charred by This 13 day of June, 195l. G, G. Smith ee ies Ulerk ot ouperior vourt Consented to: Finch . Chamblee Attorneys for Plaintiff Lewis Lewis, Lewis & Simons __ attorneys for Plaintiff This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of WE if ij i fa ho sos vit NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR Cour? NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT el Lia i : i IREDELL COUNTY WILKES COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 19 4 8. i! i en a a ae i Statesville Roofing and Heating Company, =; WA ie) Plaintiff ae : JamES MONROE FERRELL | | i | : . | | : . | S. L. Soarks, Defendant, : ae Sa | ; | Mi il } ' a That summons and complaint were served on the 27th day of April, By This cause coming on to be heard before the undersirned Clerk the Superior Court of Tan PAs: HN SOPRANOS Phe | | of the Superior Vourt ot Iredell County on this the 15th day of June, Felix E, Alley, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered H | h 1951, and it appearing to the Court that this action was co:menced on April the issues submitted to it by theourt in favor of the plaintit? ae | | 21, 1951, upon a stated auount of Five Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars and ! the defendant, as set out in the record; i | | Seventy-Nine Vents (539.79) with interest from October 13, 1950, due It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds | by the defendant to the plaintiff; of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, James Monroe Ferrell, | | and the defendant, Ina Stevenson Ferrell, be, and the saue are hereby dis- | 1951; that more than thirty days have elapsed and the defendant has failed solved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, to answer or demur to the complaint; that the plaintiff is entitled FELIX E, ALLEY | —Judge Presiding to judement oy default final. ; ; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudved and decreed that the plaintiff NORTH CAROLINA | recover judrment of the defendant for the sum of 3539.79 with interest ; WILKES COUNTY 0 1 ; and correct ; from Uctober 13, 1950, until paid. The defendant is taxed with the This is to certify that the foregoing is a true | cost ol this action. copy of the judgment of divorce granted in the above entitled cause, the This tae 15th aay or June, 1951, - original of which is of record in the Clerk's Office and may be found recorded 4 & n ii : in Minute Docket 36, at page 2, in the Clerk's Office, naving been granted o iil ate i . : Ulerk Superior Court. January 14, 1948. ) 3 This the 3d. day of February, 1951. e Goro Caudill i CLERK SUPERIOR COURT, Resa eeeeheeeeeeeeeee ee et ® NO. %857 STATE OF NORTH U AROLINA a COUNTY OF IREDELL 58 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT VIRGINIA R. WILKINSON, PLAINUIFF, ™ QRDER JAmES H. WILKINSON, SR., DEFENDANT, This cause having been brought on for hearing at the June 195] term of the Superior Court for Cabarrus County, N. C., by motion of the plaintiff for the care, custody, education and tuition ofJames H. Wikinson, Jr., and June Wilkinson, twins, ages 1l, thildren of the parties hereto, and the parties having entered into an agreement to the effect that the plaintiff is to nave the full care, custody, education and tyition of said children, Now therefore, on motion of bernard W. Cruse, counsel for the plaintiff, IT 1S ORDERED, AVJUDGED AND VEUREED that the plaintiff have the full custody, care, education and tuition of James H. Wilkinson, Jr, an June Wilkinson, twins, and ages 1l, until the further order of the Court. This matter is retained for further order. This the llth day of June, 1951, F., Donald Phillips — udge o e superior Vourt we Consent: N. Bb. Sherrin Atty. for def. RR KK mR em me kk Kk ke Ke ek yo. 5003 NORTH GAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT TREVELL COUNTY mrs, Ethel Cashion Campbell Plaintiff Wee JUDGMENT James Lester Campbell Defendant Whereas an order was issued by this Court on the l4th day of February, 1951, wherein it was decreed that the defendant pay into the office of the Clerk of Superior Court for Iredell County alimony for the plaintiff at the rate of $10.00 per week, payable on Friday of each week during the pendency of this action, or until the further order of this Court; and it further appearing to the Court from the affidavits and testimony of the plaintiff that the defendent has wilfully and wrongfully tailed and refused to couply with the said order, it being found that he was able to 80 comply; It is now, therefore, the judgment of this Court that the defendant is guilty of wilful contempt of this Vourt, and it is hereby ordered that the defendant ve imprisoned in the Iredell County Jail until the further order of this Vourt; It is further ordered that the defendant pay to tne plaintiff, on or before the expiration ot 00 days from date, the sum of $50.00 for her counsel fees; This the llth day of June, 1951. fk, Donald Phillips Judge Holding the Courts of the Fitteenth Judicial District NORTH CAROLINA In THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Mrs, Ethel Cashion Campbell Plaintiff Vs, JUDGMENT Jawes Lester Campbell Deferd ant Whereas an order was iesued by this Court on the ineh Gay 06 February, 1951, wherein it was decreed that the defendant pay into the Office of the Ulerk of Superior Vourt for Iredell County alimony in the on Friday of each week during the pendency amount of $10.00 per week payable eee ey ee ‘a ee arabs 1 een ar eet of this action, or until further order of the Court; and it appearing to the Court on the llth day of June, 1951, that the defendant had wilfully and wrongfully failed and refused to comple with the said order and it being further found that he was able to so comply it was adjudged and ordered that the defendant be imprisoned in the Iredell County Jail until further order of this court for his wilful contempt; Whereas it now appears to the Court that the defendant has paid all of the back alimony which he owed to his wife and in addition thereto $50.00 by way of counsel fees as ordered by this Court; It is nov, therefore, the order of this Court that the defendant be released from custody and prison by the Sheriff of Iredell County; It is further ordered that the defendant continue to pay to his said wife, the plaintiff, the sum of $10.00 each week, during the pendency of this action or until further order of this Court; This the 15th day of June, 1951. F, Donald Phillips Judge Holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial Vitrict * KK KK KK KK kK wk we Ke me we OK \NO. 4833 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Betore the Clerk. Mrs, Sula b. Parker, | Vs. j" JUDGMENT 3 Allen Edminston and | i G. L. Parker, i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a valuntary non-suit: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Vourt that this cause be, and the same is hereby non-suited and dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs ot' this action. fhis June 16th, 1951, GC, G, Smith Clerk Superior Vourt, County, North Carolina. rede SeKKKEKHE KKK EE EK EK OH HH MO. 5033 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR VOURT IREDELL UOUNTY STATESVILLE BRICK COmP ANY VSe Io Ix ic ite I= FRANK H. CROW THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Court and it appearing to the Court that prior to the expiration of the time for filing Answer in this cause, the attorney for the defendant had an agreement with Trivette, Holshouser and mitchell,counsel forthe plaintiff, to extend the time for filing the answer in this cause and that the answer was duly filed and that judgment was improvidently entered in said cause and should be stzicken. It is tnerefore ORDEXED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment entered in said cause be and the same is hereby vacated and the answer of the defendant is ordered duly filed in said cause as by law provided. It is further ORDERED that said cause be transferred to the Civil Issue Docket for trial. DONE, this the 23 day of June, 1951. C, G, Smith - Clerk oi the superior Court, iredeli County. kkk KK RK OK KR RK Re Oe ho. 5032 IRKVELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLExK R. W. Davis, Jr., and H. W. Sloop T/A Veavis Supply Company vs. Edward Oliver and wife, Eliose Oliver, Robert A. Collier, Trustee, and Latta Johnson JUDGMENT- Voluntary Nonsuit This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Honorable C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County this 26th day of June, 1951. Whereas it appears that all the watters and things in controversy in the above entitled action have been settled between the parties. Now, therefore, upon motion of William R. Pope, attorney for the plain- tiffs, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that a judgment of voluntary non- suit be and is hereby entered in the above entitled action. This the 26th day of June, 1951. UG. G. Smith e G, Smith, erk of the ouperior Court of Iredell County. wwe KR KK Re mK KK we me Ke me me el BH { wh j | WORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court | . } IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Ulerk : h | | 14 | William A, Cathey, Ruth H. Cathey | | | aed Robert T. Hoyle, Partners, H | trading and doing business as a | i | | Partnership under the firm name and | style of Cathey-Hoyle Company, | | iM Plaintiffs, j | Ve | ye aa Ws. | JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Hi aa | Robert L. Page, 1 Hin Defendant. | | : It gppearing to the Court that this action was instituted on September 5, 1950, and that summons has never been served on the defendant, and that the | plaintiffs now desire to take a voluntary nonsuit: It is, therefore, considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed, upon the motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, tnat the plaintiffs be, and they are hereby permitted to take a voluntary nonsuit, and this action is dismissed as a voluntary nonsuit and the cost taxed against the plaintiffs. This the 30th day of June, 1951. C. G, Smith __ Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. mom we Ke eK ee wm em WSIOTA Book 15 Page 388 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) : IN THE RICHLAND COUNTY COURT COUNTY OF RICHLAND) (DIVORCE) OLLIE L. BECKHAM, PLAINTIFF , VS. DECREE WIT.LIAM C,. BECKHAM, eer ere re DEFENDANT. This matter is presented to me through a report of the Master for Kkichland County, the Honorable Harry M. Lightsey, who held a reference thereon on November 14, 1950, and filed his report in the office of the Vlerk ot Court for Richland vounty, which report is hereby adopted as part of this order, The report states, and recommends, that a couplete divoree be rranted the Plaintiff Ollie L. Beckham from the bonds of matrimony trom the Vefendant, William C, Beckham, who, according, to the Master's report referred to above, deserted the Plaintiff on Jwly 15, 1949, which was a year prior to the Order of this Court, the filing of the Petition and Summons ot the Plaintiff asking for a complete Vivorce, On a recommendation of the master's report, the Plaintiff is entitled to a complete divorce from the Defendant on the rounds of desertion, IT 183 THEREFORK OXVEKD AND DECKEKD That the Plaintiff if hereby granted a full and complete divorce, a vinculo matrimonii, from the Defendant forever dissolving the bonds otf matrimony between them and relieving her Bt Tay of any further oblivations whatsoever under their marital contract, and That the Vefendant be awarded the custody and care of the minor child, Laura Glauudette Beckham, but that the Plaintiff is hereby allowed te privilere of visitation at all reasonable times to visit the said child at such place or places as convenient to the child, and That the Plaintiff, by this Order, is hereby privileged to use the name of Ollie L, Beckham for all purposes of indentification. That a copy ot this Order be served upon the Defendant wherever he may be found, Legare Bates Lear¢ bates rr udge ' For Richtand County Court Dated this lst day of Vec., 1950. tales Gone Enrolled this 1 day of —Nane not lest rhe ———— vec, A. De, 1950. ovewrr _— Name not degiite . . . . ee gee eee: | ae Te BES 55 a . ) Filed in office ot Clerk Superior Court of Iredel! County | on the 17th day of July, 1951. BA i | | G. G, smith iH er i | oa te kak ie | | MO. 5075 Wy | | | WORTH CAKOLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COUKT IREDELL COUNTY ? | Auto Parts & tlectric Vompany : | | : | -vs- : JUDGMENT | Douglas G, Carswell, Kuth Carswell, al and Marshall Ledfo : i This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion for a judgment by default final, for failure to file answer, vl Carswell, and Kuth Carswell are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum ot Une ant and it appearing to the Court that Alice Hl. Lowman, Doulas G, | | Hundred sixty-Seven and 32/100 ($167.32) Vollars, and that the indebtedness is a secured by a chattel mortrare upon one four door 193! Oldsmobile automobile Motor No. LA 312144, which is duly recorded in Vatawba County, North Carolina, And it appearing to tne Court that the summons was served on | : ' Dourlas C, Carswell, Kuth Carswell], and Marshal] Ledford on the 12th day of June, 1951, and that tne Sheriff of Vatawba County seized and delivered to the plaintiff the automobile above described, yh And it further appears to the Vourt that by regson of failing 4 to anawer, or to otherwise plead in this cause, the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against Vouslas G,. Carswell and Ruth Carswell in the amount of $167.32, and that it is entitled to sell the automobile to Satisfy the said judgment. | It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recoyer from the defendants, Vouglas G. Varswell and Ruth Carswell, the sum of $167.32, with interest from October 31, 1950, until padd. It is further directed that Robert A. Vollier be appointed & Commissioner ot this Court to advertise and sell the Oldsmovile automov. le at public auction after riving twenty days notice of such sale at the Court House door on the 4th day of August, 1951, and out t the proceeds of such sale ' there Pay the cost o: the sale, the cost of the action, the Judgment, and 41 18 any funds then remaining, they shall be paid to the defendants This the 17th day of July, 1951. 0 ‘ 600699.8.0082.0.2.% © 451 \ #0. 5010 i | ‘CAROLINA, rk North Carolina In the Superior Court p cle In the Superior Court HT «{L COUNTY. Before the Clerk HL Iredell County ? i | 1 ay WE 1, Howard, : h t | | Diamond Hill Coal Company plaintiff, Mf — Judgment . JUDGMENT 3Y DEFAULT i. : f FINAL IN ATTACHMENT AWE P. O. Grist and Abernathy hark Smith and wife, ! i ) Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned BRR ea ee oe ee ree ” This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard oy C. G. Smith, Clerk of the of May, 1951, and it appearing to the Court that the Summons and Claim / | Transfer and Storage Vompany pot Be lor Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and the Court finds: : i . Hi : | - Thi and delivery papers in this action were served on the Abernathy Transfer an -l- oh it / Y : . yee a Wi iit Storage Company on the 17th day ot April, 1951 and that the defendant is Tat this action was commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North | | Wii ' tk He | P| ii | Fr P. O. Grist is not to be found in the State of North Carolina and is said ling, On September 18, 1950, and that on Septemoer 18, 1950, the plaintiff filed with ; | rit a oy law. * oF Hil! to be residing in the State of Maryland; that the Detendant Abernathy Transfer wrt and affidavit for warrant of attachment, and gave the bond required by tas ft Mek it | and Storage Company has surrended the property to the plaintiff under the > my ty a of Septemoer, 1950, summons was issued vy this Court to the Ulaim and delivery papers and makes no further claim to the property and That on the 18th day P » 1950, iff of Iredell County directing the Sheriff of Iredell County to serve said summons ! effort to reach the defendant P. 0. Grist have been fruitless both to the te defendants; that at the same time, to-wit, on Septemver 18, 1959, a warrant of Plaintiff and to the Sheriff and therefore personal service of summons and pment was issued by this Court, directed to the Sheriff of Ireiell County ordering Complaint cannot be made on him and personal judgment cannot be taken against attach and keep safely all of the property of the defendants found in his County, him. »mch thereof as might ve sufficient to satisfy the demand of the plaintiff in this It further appears to the court that the defendant P. 0. Grist n, with cost and expenses. is indebted to the plaintiff in the amount $173300 with interest from April ; Pa , 9 i j , is s ed by a i 17th, 1951 until paid and that the note for said amount is secur y That at the time of the commencement of this action the Court, upon application oy | i i in default. ) title retained contract, and that the payments on said note are in jluintitr, signed an order extending the time for the plaintiff to file his complaint It is therefore ordered and directed that Plaintiff shall hover 8, 1950. advertise and sell the Admiral Jual Tem Refrigebator Model 958 Serial No. Y -k- 213650 at Public Auction as prescribed by General Statutes for such sales ’ That the Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, pursuant to the warrant of and that a copy of this judgement be mailed to the defendant at his last ment issued oy this Court, did, on September 18, 1950, levy on and take into his known address and a copy of the sales notice and judgment to the Abernathy ion certain household and kitchen furniture and other personal property belonging Transfer and Storace Vompany to the end that they may forward same to the fs defendants, and which is particularly described on the inventory filed by the . detendant shoula he desire to redeam the property by payment of the note, “ft of Iredell County in this office, and also descrived on the sheet hereto a | with interest and the cost. “ "Exhibit A"; that the Sheriff of Iredell County filed his return in this office on Wer 20, 1950, together with the inventory of the pers ynal property velonging to the G. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court “nts which he had levied on and taken into his possession. we ke me me me me me eK me a Om wified complaint and by the oath and examination of the plaintiff, that the ie on October 20, 1950, made an order that the summons and notice of issuance of the i i | | Til - -8- | I | | oe ae Se ae Pee SE ene See ee ne time allowed by That the last publication of the summons and notice of the issuance of | | i | | | | the order of extension in that October 8, 1950, fell on Sunday), the plaintire yo warrant OF order of attachment in the Statesville Daily was Navember 8, 1950, | | t ) , er ee ee defendants Were wd service of summons on the defendants was completed on November 15, 1950; that | | | , ee —o - the time for the defendants to answer, demur or otherwise plead has not been ex- i. | Hts | i terest thereon from September 18, 1950, until paid, at the rate of six Per cent pep yoied, and the time for the defendants to answer, demur or otherwise plead to the 1 1 | cml, by Teaser GF Ge PIsInsets being ah eHdureer oh Se Bote Of ths defendants to mplaint has expired, and the defendants have not filed an answer, demurrer or | | | i] the Peoples Loan and Savings 3ank, Incorporated, Statesville, North Carolina, which leading, and have not made any appearance in this action. if | i ek the plaintiff had to pay on September 18, 1950. —_— 9 | Hi) | -9- i Hi 4 ; > That on the 10th day of October, 1950, the defendants paid to the i | H Hii That the defendants could not after due diligence, search and inquiry, quintiff on the indebtedness set forth in the compleint the sum of Two Hundred AM | Hh i be found within the State of North Carolina, and upon the return of the Sheriff of sainig ($200.00), and it appears to the satisfaction of the Court from the i) Hi ihe Iredell County and an affida it filed wy the plaintiff accordinz to law, the Court Hy wfendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One Humdred Dollars ($100.00), warrant or order of attachment oe served on the defendants ody publication in the . | : A | Re gether with interest thereon from Septemver 18, 1950, at the rate of six per ' H i i 4 Statesville Daily, a newspaper pudlished in Iredell County, North Carolina; that on wit per annum until paid, and together with interest on the sum of Two Hundred : I ik October 20, 1950, this Court issued a summons and notice of issuance of the warrant Mi nuars ($200.00) from September 18, 1950, to Octover 10, 1950, shhh abke ak te | t i or order of attachment to be served on the defendants by pudlication. 9 Mie plaintiff or to anyone for his use on account of the demand set forth in the t That summons oy publication and notice of the issuance of the warrant or M ute of six per cent per annum, ant that the only payment which has deen made to i t wmplaint, is the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), paid Octover 19, 1950, order of attachment was duly published in the Statesville Daily, a newspaper tr which credit has been given as hereinavove set forth. puolished in Iredell County, North Carolina, once a week for four consecutive weeks, -10- ul to-wit, October 18, October 25, Novemoer 1, and Novemoer 8, 1950, and that the That under the authority of the warrant or order of attachment, herein- | same set forth the nature and purpose of this action, and that a writ of attach utore referred to, the Sheriff of Iredell County levied upon and attached, and ment had been issued by this Court, and that the Sheriff of Iredell County had tu has in his possession certain household and kitchen furniture and other per- W ; attached, levied on and taken into his possession certain household and kitchen, m'nal property belonging to the defendants, and that the plaintiff is entitled WW and other personal property oselonging to the defendants; and that the plaintiff have the aforesaid personal property, and any other property which may ve here~ 1 had filed a verified complaint allezing that the defendants were indeoted to his ter attached by the Sheriff of Iredell County, sold to satisfy this Judgment. in the sum of Three fundred Dollars ($300.00), together with interest thereon from ah Septemser 18, 1950, at the rate of six per cent per annum, by reason of the plain That the plaintiff should be given the right to oid at any sale of the e tiff being an endorser on the note of the defendants and having to pay said not tached property hereinbefore referred to. as such endorser, and further setting forth that the plaintiff had prayed in i sa complaint that said attached property ve sold to satisfy the plaintiff's claim That the Sheriff of Iredell County stored the personal property of the er ' and further notifying said defendants that unless they filed an answer, demurt ‘tfendants which was levied on ant attached, in the Seville 3onded Warehouse, ly or other pleading within the time required oy law, that the plaintiff would app 10? waz2 Street, Statesville, North Carolina, and that it would be less cost, and for the relief demanded in his complaint. 0 the vest interest of all parties concerned tha the sale of said property ve North Carolina. “ld at the Seville 3onded Warehouse, 1107 Mill Street, Statesville, 6. That this judgment shall not, however, be held or construed as a IT IS, THERFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: yrsonel judgment against the defendants, and their liability hereunto shall be 1. That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of sited to the proceeds of the sale of the attached property, hereinvefore referred One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), together with interest thereon from the 18th day of yy, and to such other property as may be attached in this cause upon motion, or September, 1950, until paid, at the rate of six per cent per anmam, and with in. y order of the Court at any later date. terest on the sum of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) from September 18, 1950, until 7. That the plaintiff is permitted to oid and purchase said property, or October 10, 1950, together with the cost of this action to ve taxed by the Clerk wy part thereof at the sale. of this Court. 2. That all costs in this action shall oe taxed against the defendants, This the 2th day of July, 1951. and included in the cost that shall be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, shal) vo» the following: C. G. Smith A. All the costs of this action, indluding publication of summons. aaa, Sa baeukee, , a B. Cost of transporting and moving said property to Seville Bonded Warehouse by Holland Transfer Company, $21.89. HH HH HH C. Storage of the attached personal property to Seville jonded Ware- i». 1950 house, $120.00. RH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court D. Fire insurance premium to Fox Insurance Agency on the personal REDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk property, $7.3). E. The auctioneer fee for handlinz the sale, and such other costs as iV. Ammon and wife, Carolyn 6 i, Ammon, , may de indluded in the sale, indluding moving of the property from the warehouse Plaintiffs, to the outside for the purpose of sale. 0 JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT Vs. { FINAL IN ATTACHMENT F. All fess to the Sheriff of Iredell County in this cause. 6 Prank Smith and wife, Hester { G. The cost of advertising the sale under this judgment and the “By uth, 4 execution. ) Defendants. 3- That the Sheriff of Iredell County oe, and he is hereby authorized and directed to sell as in the case of execution the personal property attached Thi t e heard, and being heard by C. Ge Smith, Clerk by him and now in his possession, or so much thereof as my de necessary to # cause coming on to b , t finds: satisfy this judgment, and to pay the Court the proceeds of such sale, and to this the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and the Cour n end it is ordered that an execution off this judgment ove issued to the Sheriff of 1 e That this action was commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County, Iredell County, directing him to sell the attached personal property. forth Carolina, on October 10, 1950, and that on Octover 10, 1950, the plaintiffs 4. That the sale of the property under the execution issued hereunder ‘led with the Court an affidavit for warrant of attechment, and gave the bond be advertised under the law applying to execution s@les, and that the sale ve ee 1 aw. held at the Seville 3onded Warehouse, 1107 Mill Street, Statesville, North Caro y iaw lina, o2e 5. That the fun Tredell That on the 10th day of October, 1950, summons was issued by this Court ° 6 ds paid into this Court oy the Sheriff of Irede P oS voure V7 a the Sheritr of Iredell County, directing the Sheriff of Iredell County to County be applied so far as they may extend, or may be necessary, to the sat 1a by th! “ve said summons on the defendants; that at the same time, to-#it, on Octover faction e of this judgment, and that the balance, if any, be paid into and h scash. denen te tn Cc np, Vs » 1950, a warrant of attachment was issued by this ourt to apply on the judgment entered in the attachment action entitled, ” ‘write of Iredell County ordering him to attach and keep safely all of the or Ammon and wife, Carolyn H. Ammon, Plaintiffs, vs. W. Frank Smith and wife, Hest Be perty 5 ty, or so much thereof as might be Smith, Defendants," a accordins * ¥ of the defendants found in his County, “ficient to satisfy the demand of the plaintiffs in this action, with cost and "Dens es, and any surplus paid to the defendants, or disourse law. -3- That at the time of the commencement 0 f this action the Court, upon i application by the plaintiffs, signed an order extending the time for the plaints, | | to file thetr complaint to October 30, 1950. | “7 | | We -h- That summons by publication and notice of the issuance of the warrant or if | | | That the Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, pursuant to the wer of attechment was duly published in the Statesville Daily, « newspaper | | i | warrant of attachment issued by this Court, did, on October 12, 1950, levy on an nolished in Iredell County, North Carolina, once a week for four consecutive i ik | take into his possession certain household and kitchen furniture and other per. mutts, to-wit, Novenber 9, November 16, November 23, and November 30, 1950, and \ A ie sonal property belonging to the defendants, and which is particularly described that the same set forth the nature and purpose of this action, and that a writ of : | ! | | on the inventory filed by the Sheriff of Iredell County in this office, and also tachment had been issued by the Court, and thet the Sheriff of Iredell County A i | | described on the sheet hereto attached marked "Exhibit A"; that the Sheriff of yd attached, levied on, and taken into his possession certain household and ll ! : Iredell County filed his return in this office on Octover 12, 1950, together dtchen furniture and other personal property belonging to the deferdarts, subject iM . | | | ! with the inventory of the personal property belonging to the defendants which he the attachment and levy made by the Sheriff of Iredell County ir the action | | i | q had levied on and taken into his possession. ntitled "E. E. Howard, Plaintiff, vs. W. Frank Smith and wife, Hester Smith, | ] i | — wendants"; and that the plaintiffs had filed « verified complaint alleging that t i | ‘h he That on the 30th day of October, 1950 (being within the time allowed by he defendants were indebted to them in the sum of Three Hundred Fighty-eight ! | | i the order of extension), the plaintiffs filed a duly verified complaint with the nllars ($388.00), together with interest thereon from August 21, 1950, at the | , | Court alleging that the defendants were indebted to them in the sum of Three ute of six per cent per annum, by reason of the defendants hotehaving paid to ' i | Mt Hundred Eicht-eight Dollars ($4388.00), together with interest thereon from Mmulther Building Company and for the cost of a loan on the real estate purchased ) August 21, 1950, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, by reason of hon the defendants the sum of Three Hundred Eighty-eight Dollars ($388.00), which | | the defendants not having paid the sum of Two Hundred Thirty-eight Dollars te plaintiffs had paid to the defendants for this purpose, and further setting | ($238.00) to Gaither Building Company, and the sum of One Hundred Fifty Dollars th that the plaintiffs had prayed in their complaint that said property be sold | ($150.00) for the cost of obtaining a loan on real estate which the plaintiffs wetisfy the plaintiffs' claim; and further notifying said deferdarts that | had purchased from tne defendants, and that the aforesaid sums of money, totalling vless they filed an answer, denwrrer, or other plesaing within the time required Three hundred Eighty-eight Dollars ($388.00), have beer. duly paid to the defendents Mm’ la, that the plaintiffs would apply for the relief demanded in their complaint. by the plaintiffs, and that they have failed and refused to pay the same as they -8- } agreed with the plaintiffs to do, and thet the plaintiffs had to expend the B That the last puolication of the summons and notice of the issuance of a tw warrant or order of attachment in the Statesville Daily was Novemoer 40, 1950, additional sum of Three Hurdred Eivhty-eight Dollars ($388.00) on account of the | = defendants having their Fe ti service of summons on the deferdants was completed or December 7, 1950; that | 3 failed to pay the said sum of money in accordarce with E contract, said indebtedness hsving arisen through the purchase of real estate in | time for the deferdants to answer, demur or otherwise plead has not deen ex- the City of Statesville by the plaintiffs from the defendants on the 21st day of ‘4 med, and the time for the defendants to answer, demur or otherwise plead to s August, 1950. %* complaint has expired, and the defendants have not filed an answer, demurrer i. "* other pleading, and have not made any appearance in this action. That the defendants could not after due diligence, search and inquiry, ‘ -%9e be found within the State of North Carolina, and upon the return of the sheriff f § And it appears to the satisfaction of the Court from the verified | Iredell County and an affidavit filed vy the plaintiffs according to law, the Cr Mg Pleint and by the oath and examination of the plaintiffs, that the eatannense ih on November 9, 1950, made an order that the summons and notice of issuance of M™ “tindeoted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Three Hundred Eight-eight Dollars i warrart or order of attachment be served on the defendants oy publication in the 188.00), together with interest thereon from August 21, 1959, until paid, at Statesville Daily, « newspaper published in Iredell County, Korth caroline; tt PM“ "te of six per cent per annum, and thet no payment has deen made to the on Novemoer 9, 1950, this Court issued a summons and notice of issuance of th Mintitts or to anyone for their use on account of the demand set forth in the "ple int Z warrart or order of attachment to be served on the defendants by publication sti. That under the authority of the warrant or order of attachment, herein before referred to, the Sheriff of Iredell County levied upor ana attached, an now has in his possession certain household and kitchen furniture ana Other per. sonal property belonging to the defendants, and that the plaintiffs are entitled to have the aforesaid personal property, and any other property which may ve here. after attached by the Sheriff of Iredell County, sold to satisfy this Judgment, the sale to oe sudject to the claim of E. E. Howard in his attachment action against W. Frank Smith and wife, Hester Smith, and all the costs in said action, ait. That the plaintiffs should be given the right to bid at any sale of the attached property hereinbefore referred to. o12- That the Sheriff of Iredell County stored the personal property of the deferdants which was levied on and attached, inthe Seville 3onded Warehouse, 1107 Mills Street, Statesville, North Carolina, and that it would ve less cost, and to the best interest of all parties concerned that the sale of said property be held at the Seville Bonded Warehouse, 1107 Mill Street, Statesville, North Care lina. -13- That the sale of the attached property in this action is to be made sudject to the satisfaction first from the proceeds of the sale of the claim of E. E. Howard in his attachment action against W. Frank Smith and wife, Hester Smith. IT IS, THEKEFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiffs have and recover of the defendants the sum of Thres Hundred Eighty-eight Dollars ($388.00), together with interest thereon fro the 2lst day of August, 1950, until paid, at the rate of six per cent per annul, and together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. é. That all costs in this action shall be taxed against the defendants, and included in the cost that shall be taxed oy the Clerk of this Court, shall be the following: A. All the costs of this action, indluding pudlication of summons. B. The auctioneer fee for handling the sale, and such other costs as 6 may be indluded in the sale, inéluding moving of the property from the war enous to the outside for the purpose of sale, G- All fees to the Sheriff of Iredell County in this cause. D. The cost of advertising the sale under this judgment and the execution. on SiS eee ee That the Sheriff of Iredell County oe, and he is hereby authorized 4e ipa directe smmrae = - oe ee Sa ce rat 4 to sell as in the case of execution the pers>nal property attached in his possession, or so much thereof as my be necessary to é yee we Pe fy this judgment, and to pay the Court the proceeds of such sale, and to this yatis a es are ae eS ae it is ordered that an execution on this judgment be issued to the Sheriff of ind rede County, 4. That the sale of the property under the execution issued hereunder directing him to sell the attached personal property. avertised under the law applying to execution sales, and that the sale be 0 & id at the Seville Bonded Warehouse, 1107 Mill Street, Statesville, North Caro- ne ling. 5. That the funds from the sale of the attached property oe paid into this Court by the Sheriff of Iredell County to be applied so far as they may ex- ynd, or may be necessary to the satisfaction of the judgment entered on this date ir the action entitled, "E. E. Howard, Plaintiff, vs. W. Frank Smith and wife, wster Smith, Defendants," and that the balance ve paid into and held by this turt to apply on this judgment, and any surplus remainirg thereafter shall be wid to the defendants or disoursed according to law. 6. That this judgment shall not, however, be held or constured as 4 yrsonal judgment against the defendants, and their liadility hereunto shall be limited to the proceeds of the sale of the attached property, hereinbefore re- frred to, and to such other property as may oe ees 2 Oe Cee wtion, or by order of the Court at any later date. 7. That the plaintiffs are permitted to oid and purchase said property, wany part thereof at the sale. This the 2th day of July, 1951. C. G. Smith was Slerk of Superior court of Iredell County, North Carolina. ae ‘NO. 5073 NORTH CAROLINA, That the Court finds from the duly verified Complaint, and the itemized In the Superior Court yerified statement attached to the Complaint, and marked "Ehibit A", that the IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk jefendant 4g now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the neats and other merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statemert, marked "Exhivit A", Statesville Packing Company, um of Three Hundred Fifty-six Dollars Eight cents ($356.08), together with Plaintiff, 4 the 8 JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT @ interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 43lst day of oan FINAL. January» 1951, until paid. A. We. Couch, trading and doing ousiness | as Couch Grocery, } IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREFD that the } Deferdant. 0 plaintiff recover of the defendant, A. W. Couch, trading and doing business as couch Grovery, the sum of Three Hundred Fifty-5ix Dollars Fight Cents ($456.08), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cert per arnum from the This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before t i 8 ’ g e the under 4 ist day of Jamary, 1951, until paid, and the costs of this action to the taxed signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this E te oy the Clerk of the Court. i the 25th day of July, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys eh Poe ar This the 25th day of July, 1951. AM for the plaintiff, for judgement by default final, and it appearing to the +A et Court: 4 a C. Ge Smith ins a Clerk of Superior court of Tredell 4 County, North Carolina That on June 5, 1951, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. «2» YoY 5083 Th @ vorrz caronra at summons was issued from this Court on June 5, 1951, to the Sheriff — ’ re IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk of Iredell County, and was returnadle as provided vy law. -3- edie t 38S « Bn aia Ea at That the summons was served on the defendant by Sam Laws » toate a gute of € ’ Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on June 5th, 1951, by leaving with the a aia umm is ain ° deferdant a copy of the s ons, together with a copy of the complaint. 4 : 4 0 JUDGMENT 3Y DEFAULT FINAL. @ ‘reham J. White, ( That the time for the defendant to answer or otherwise plead to the ie eferdant. Complaint in this action has not oeen extended, and the time allowed oy 1s for the defendant to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint in this action ad and being heard oefore the under- has now elapsed, and the defendant has hot file’ an answer, demurer, OF other This cause coming on to be heard, ‘igned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this pleading or motion in this caus ss e. Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys 5 * the 25th day of July, 1951, on motion of Adams, @ fr the praints nt by default final, and it appearing to the That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum ; Piaintiff, for judgeme y certain in Court: money due for meats and other merchandise sold and delivered t° the -l- defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain d Complaint That on June 16, 1951, the plaintiff filed « duly verified Comp sum therefor; that an itemized v " 8 erified statement, marked "Exhibit A", 8 j in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell attached to, and made a part of the Complaint, which statement set forth the Crane nty, meats arid merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price "? LODe paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the branes! -2- 40.4798 opt CAROLINA, That summons was issued from this Court on June 16, 1951, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, ard was returnable as provided by law, -3< That the summons was served on the defendant oy W. Cc, Jenkins, Deputy q ark Davis ard A. Maury Gaston, Partners, Sheriff of Iredell County, on June 20, 1951, by leavinz with the defendant a and doing ousiness under the tener ship name of Pebble Hill Turkey copy of the summons, together with a copy of the Complaint, Part. 1 iff é Plaint 8, ~h- vs. That the time for the defendant to answer, demur, or obtherwise plead . Miller, trading and doing business = the name and style of B. M. Miiler to the complaint in this action has not been extended, and the time &llowed by and Company, law for the defendant to answer, demur, or otherwise plead to the complaint in Defendant. this action has now elapsed, and no answer, demurer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. =§ 3 That the verified Complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain . ee ee 468 In the Superior Court Before the Clerk. JUDGEMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard oefore the undersigned tlerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the summons was issued from this Court in the aoove entitled in money due as rent for a farm for the cahkendar year 1950, under the contract and agreement 6f the defendant to pay a certain sum as rent for said farm for the a calendar year 1950; that the defendant contracted and agreed with the plaintiff : to pay the sum of $500.00 as rent for the farm for the calendar year 1950 and to pay the same on or before January 1, 1951; that the defendant paid on said rent and under his contract and agreement with the plaintiff the sum of $100.0 or the 19th day of Decemoer, 1950. -6= That the Court finds from the duly verified Complairt, thet the defendant # This the 26th day of July, 1951. is now due the plaintiff under his rental contract of the farm for the calender jou 1950, the sum of Four Hundred Dollars ($400.00), together with interest thereon ve the rate of six per cent per annum from the lst day of Jarmary, 1951, until paid. 4 IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the | plaintiff recover of the defendant, Graham J. White, the sum of Four Hundred “HSENTED TOs Dollars ($400.00), together with interest thereon st the rate of six per cent Mana, Dearman and Winberry, per annum fron the lst day of Jamary, 1951, until paid, and the costs of this fs y C. Be Wirberr action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. g torneys for the Pratntirrs. "i This the 25th day of July, 1951. 3 4 eee H f Clerk of Superior Court ° Iredell County, Yrorth carolins eee eee HH He ee % eH % "H wtion to the Sheriff of Alexander County, N. C., on the 10th day of December, 19, and that summons has never been served, and it further appearing to the turt from the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plain- tiffs, that the plaintiffs desire to take a voluntary nonsuit in this action; A i If IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORD» RED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, upon motion 4 A % 4 . “ Ag é < of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, that the plaintiffs % non suited, and this action dismissed as of voluntary non suit, and that the wsts of this action be taxed against the plaintiffs. C. G. Smith cam @ierk of Superior court of Tredell County, North Carolina. Ufo. 1,00 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Mrs. F. Be Bunch, Sr., trading and doing business as Bunch Hatchery, Plaintiff, alii JUDGEMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUT?, James F. Leslie, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 26th day of July, 1951, and it appearing to the Court from the Statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things in con- troversy in this action have been settled and compromised, and that the plaintiff desire to take a nonsuit in this action; IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, upon motion of Adams, Dearmar. and Winoerry, Attorneys for the pleintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and that this action be dismissed and terminated as of nonsuit, and that the plaintiff be taxed with the costs ir this action to be charged and taxed by the Clerk of Court. This the 26th day of July, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell Coupty, North Carolins. CONSENTED TO: Adams, Dearmar & Winberry, By_C. §. Winberry Attorneys for the Plainti?r. a a ee ee wigs coat CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Before the Clerk and Howard Company of MekOr» Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs- JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL. in tT, Brown, trading and doing nae as Brown! s Feod Store, statesville, Ne Ce Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned tlerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 26th day of July, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearmar & Winberry, Attorneys for the plain- ’ tiff, for judgement by default final, and it appearing to the Court: ole That on August 2, 1950, the plaintiff filed a duly verified Complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. a2» That Summons was issued from this Court on August 2, 1950, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. -3- att That the Summons was served on the defendant by C. Re King, Deputy Sher dant a copy of of Iredell County, on August th, 1950, by leaving with the defen the Summons, together with a copy of the Complaint. -k- That the time for the deferdart to answer, for the deferdant to answer, demur, or demur, or otherwise plead was not extended, and the time allowed oy law d no answer otherwise plead to the Complaint in this action has now elapsed, an , ndant. femrrer, other pleading or motion has oeen filed oy the defe | J -5- plaintiff demands a sum certain That the verified Complaint filed oy the ed to the defendant under the con- ‘n money due for merchandise sold and deliver herefor; that an Contract and agreement of the defendart to pay 8 certain sum the , : z and made a pa itemized verified statement, marked "Exhioit A", was attached to, sed, the date f the Complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchse ’ 11 debits and °f the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained 4 ‘edits arising out of the transaction. 7 That the Court finds from the duly verified Complaint, and the Itemizeg verified statement attached to the Complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that the deferdant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Two Hundred Forty-Six Dollars Seventy Cents ($26.70), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per annum from the 10th day of December, 1948, unti) paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant Fleet T. 3rown, trading and doing business as Brown's Food Store, Statesville, N. C., the sum of Two Hundred Forty-Six Dolzars Seventy Cents ($246.70), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 10th day of December, 19,8, until paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of Court. This the 26th day of July, 1951. C. Ge Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, RHR He HH flo. 91h NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Thomas and Howard Company of Hickory, Incorporated, Plaintiff, -VSs- JUDGEMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL. Luther R. Conger, trading and doing business as Carolina Curo Market, Statesville, N. C., ooo oO OO OS OO OS Oe Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard vefore the under signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Yorth Carolina, on thls 26th day of July, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys ” the plaintiff, for judgement by default final, and it appearing to the Court! ele That on August 2, 1950, the plaintiff filed a duly verified Complein in:the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. se os 9 «Be That Summons was issued from this Court on August 2, 1950, to the speriff of Iredell County, and was returnaole as provided by law. -3- That the Summons was served on the deferdant by C. R. King, Deputy neriff of Iredell County, on August 8, 1950, by leaving with the defendant a copy of the Summons, together with a copy of the Complaint. -l- That the time for the defendant to answer, demur, or otherwise plead ms not extended, and the time allowed by law for the deferdant to answer, demur, otherwise plead to the Complaint in this action has now elapsed, and no answer, imrrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. -5- That the verified Complaint filed by the pleintiff demands a sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the con- tract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized verified statement, marked "Exhibit A", was attached to, and made a part of the Complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and edits arising out of the transaction. be That the Court finds from the duly verified Complaint, and the itemized wrified statement attached to the Complaint, ard marked "Exhibit A", that the ieferdant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the wrchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A", the sum of line Hundred Sixty-Eight Dollars Ninety-Five Cents ($968.95), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per arnum from the th day of Jure, 1948, intil paid, IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDEKED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED That the laintiff recover of the defendant, Luther R. Conger, trading and doing business "Carolina Curd Market, Statesville, N. C., the Sum of Nine Hundred Sixty-Eight ® Dllars Ninety-Five Cents ($968.95), together with interest thereon at the rate atx per cent per annum form the th day of June, 1948, until paid, and the “sts of this action to ve taxed by the Clerk of Court. This the 26th day of July, 1951. Ce Ge Smith Gicrk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. paaenaeaeae 2 20% Ms . 4976 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk J. C. Dalton, Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Mrs. Nannie Keller Kimmons, formerly Nannie Keller Rae, and R. A. Collier, Attorney and Escrow Agent, Se Se ee om oe Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superi Court of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court fron the statement of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising in this action have been settled, and that the deed referred to in the application for extensig of time to file Complaint has been executed and delivered, and that the contract for sale of land has been fully complied with, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit; And it further appearing to the Court that the Complaint has not been filed and the sumons h not been served on the defendants, and the Attorneys for the plaintiff paid to the Clerk of Court the sum of $1.60 to cover the fee for serving summons on the defendants; IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the costs of this action be taxed by the Clerk of Court against the plaintiff, and that the sum of $1.60 paid to the Clerk of Court as fee for serving the Summons be fefunded and paid to Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff. This the 28th day of July, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Coutt of Tredeli county, North Carolina. CONSENTED TO: ADAMS, DEARMAN AND WINSBEPRY, Attorneys for the plaintiff, By: C. B. Winberry HRHRHRHHHHH HHH HH ist ony CAROLINA, rf) COUNTY ® In the Superior Court Before the Clerk qi He Holmes and wife, spe Holmes, Plaintiffs, -VS- JUDGHENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT |, Kimmons , Administrator of the vate Of Be Ae Kimmons, B. As ms, Commissioner, W. L. Kimmons, Mividuall, Ralph S. Kimmons, Mr. ¢Kinnons Benfield, John S. ions, Mrs. Nannie Keller Kimmons, 42, A. Collier, Attorney and Escrow Defendants. This cause coming on to be hard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, man and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, that all matters and things arising in this action been settled, and that the deed referred to in the application for extension of time to file Com- hint has been executed and delivered and the contract for sale of land fully complied, and that the wntiffs desire to take a voluntary nonsuit; And it further appearing to the Court that the Complaint has not been filed, and that the mis was never served on the defendants, and that the Attorneys for the plaintiffs paid into the tof Court the sum of $4.80 to cover the fee for servings summonses; IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED Upon motion of Adams, Dearman and Mery, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, that the plaintiffs be nonsuited, and that this action be dis- Ned and terminated as of voluntary nonsuit, and that the plaintiffs be taxed with the costs of this on, and that the sum of $4.80 paid to the Clerk Court for serving summonses be refunded and paid to as, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs. This the 28th day of July, 1951. C. Ge Smith Clerk of superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. P2TED TO BY: “s, Dearman and Winberr y ™eys for the plaintiffs, its ite M Winberry RHKRHRHHHH HHH HHH HT Se ee ernst tte SUPERIOR COURT WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Monday, July 30th, 1951’ 471 : NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ' | a yi A f i, IREDELL COUNTY. AUGUST TERM, 1951 A Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for i) Hi the County and State aforesaid, at the Courthouse in Statesville, I. C. on the 30th, day of July, 1951, at 10:00 O'clock, A. M., when and where His Honor, ity i H, Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding and Holding Vourts for this the Fifteenth Judicial I ! % eit a. District of North Carolina, Fall Term, 1951, is present and presiding and wu & aT Honorable Zeb A Morris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the EEL Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the iF i! i Bt ibes name of the State. J. C. Rumple, HighSheriff of Iredell County is present and \ vit: VARA | 8 ee opened Court by order of the Court. i il) i 1341 J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court i} iH is the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the First i I} ; Week of this the August Term, 1951 Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: Hl Ha Pe! i . HE Robert E Caldwell § Kenneth A Robinson f yj White J E Dooley i | WH Payne John H Rogers Frak L Holland Everett L Williams i ) 1 r nq Hi i Hite Clay Baird J C Murdock D & Hayes R C Bunch i ie), r Hi } i }: JC Smith Mrs RH Reavis Howard Combs N J Speece Heat a 1 A Mrs Rome G Christie W A Barnette T R Ridge ‘3 | N Gilbert Harry P Honeycutt M J Angell J O Holt John ss W M Baile a L A Bost R E Barker C F Bess y i : Joe Pipkin Horace C Neel hit Hy J Boyce Brown O R Mills, Sr nit ia ‘ Mrs Ross Brady : T W Critz Charlie Potts L L Sherill ii Chavis Renwick NC Brown William B Hooper Sam Ingram Oh4 Fred W Ramsey Miss Lucy King BH Gillespie James © Shinn 1 David Isenhour J M Powell | JR Gabriel Ernest N Ferguson The following good and lawful men were duly drawn and sworn to serve | as the Grand Jury for the Six Months period ending December 31, 1951. Sammy Laws, | , : ) , 5 r age 5 years was directed by the Court to draw the jury of July-August Term Superio Court Iredell County. | Joe Pipkin Mrs Rome G Christie T W Critz William B Hooper John N Gilbert M J Angell | J C Murdock Mrs R H Reavis Howard Combs | T R Ridge BH Gillespie Fred W Ramsey Ernest N Ferguson TM White D E Hayes Clay Baird Miss Lucy King J R Rives JC Murdock was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. James Tomlin, was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK === AUGUST TERM, 1951 FIRST WEEK ---- AUGUST THERM, 1951 Monday, July 30th, 1951 Monday, July 30th, 1951 Robert E Caldwell, R E Barker were not found. Mo. 1339 DRIVING DRUNK W H Payne was in Service. 7 ong hong vs Charlie Potts, Frank L Holland were out of the County, : David H Harkey J E Dooley was excused by the Court. a en ere State Continued under former order Ts © : a e on } 4 vs Bie W P Morrison was summonsed and sworn as Talesman Juror. | Jimmie Reece Wooten Mo. 1371 PERMITTING PERSON TO OPLRATE HIS 1 E WH 4 State No. 1103 False Pretense q vs State { Alias Capias 4 Garris Calloway Waddell vs Guy Ransey Continued under former order. a No. 1372 }| DRIVING DRUNK: DRIVING AFTER LICENSE REVOKED ! - 4 State The Court finds as a fact that the deft has wilfully ioe 12K5 a 3 vs failed to comply with the terms of the judgment heretofore = Se James Anderson J entered, orders capias and comaitment to issue for his hea / |] imprisonment as stated in the judgment. , Mary Saunders hy TRANSPORTING LIQUOR. State Instanter Capias. State Alias vs vs » 1376 { No. 1360 ' FORGERY Ho. 137 ig i Ervin Feimster J Samuel Brawley | % se \REPTING TH TRANSPORTING LIQUOR. y ° 5 0 aore i AIDING & ABETTING N TRANSPORTING LLY Ng. . wher 4 ye Continued under former order. State Alias 4 vs ee de Ralph Edward Farrell Ervin Feimster \No. 1362 FORGERY , Wo. 1396 | DRIVING DRUNK: RECKLESS DRIVING : Ali State | Continued under former order. otate Alias | vs i Norman Taylor Hoover arvin Freimster i a DRIVING DRUNK — INo. 1363 FORGERY re Judgment of the court is that the defeniant be am State Alias Capi 3 vs in the common jail of iredell County sor DT si vs ie Bruce Mayhew FOUR MONTHS to be assigned to work under the sapervi's Ervin Feimster of the State Highway ana Public works GormlSSlone JIN Z ADA t ' DINK Ee No. 1364 FORG atY ta Wo. 1394 DRIVING DRUNK ; a fai led Juds: ent Nisi Sei Fa and atate Alias of State Defendant called and ailed. gent lagi Sod, Fe a “ vs capias. Process to issue at the pleasure } Ervin Feinster Frank N Moore Wo. 1387 AWD W d flo. 1437 VIOLATING CITY ORDINANCE State Continued under former order State Continued vs vs Johnnie Meten Harold E Roseman JNo. 1504 TRANSPORTING ‘ ’ we CTTY ORDINANCE State Continued * “7 14,38 VIOLATING — ae vs b tate Continue Ralph Shue . bi Harold E Roseman No, 1509 LARCENY ° ARCE aan = TAX PU LIQUOR 3 vr = oe anne “eo Pe etendant vetied and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and 8 Toby Hyde vs X\ capias. Emma Johnson | 4No 1519 BREAKIN aT mney in a ; O60 HARING, ENTERING & LARCENY Mo 1512 | LARCENY . 2 “ie : ‘Lec Nisi Sci Fa and —— Continued State Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi v r vs capias. Clarence Lowell Lytle, Jr vs Luther "Luke" Kimm KING, ENTERING & LARCENY a Continued Wo. 1549 ASSAULT WITH D#ADLY WEAPON oy: conse io be sent to Federal Prison. State vs Will Mathis, Alias ¢ | Wo. 1520 | BREA Will Mathews | *. vs William Leroy Smith % i aie a a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT N THE SUPERIO; First Week ---- August Term, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ----- AUGUST TERIi, 1951 475 ' | : Monday, July 30th, 1951 Monday, July 30th, 1951 . | in Nos. 1550 & SPEEDING: TRANSPORTING & POSSESS NON-TAX pAryz / J LARCEN ie | ° ALD LIc - O ARCENY | 1552 Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Set pe af ed | A True Bill ie State and capias. a bn i vs is Greshhm ft Carl Asbury Brown Dennis & i eee ato. 1572 BREAKING & ENTERING ier qo. 1552 SPEEDING a State A True Bill ia State Continued for the State. v8 Hil vs d Little, Alias 4 Charles Edward Myers eects Little fl al ie ARCEI i, Wo. 1553 DRIVING DRUNK | ies oo ; ° A True Bill ie State On the defendant's motion to remove to Alexander County m9 ns 8 i vs hiotion is allowed in the discretion of the Court for the’ | L at Bell Cloud 1 . His Vance Parl Sharpe convenience of witnesses and the defendant. : " a WO ARAL Mi tap | | 4 ; 4 qi ; 5 Me q dio. 1561 LARCENY i} t ¥ \Nos. 1581 & BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY. q = ee Te bi 1582 Defendant called & failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Faand | aE hi : Stace easlaa. * Lillie Cloud | | i igh vs ; POEM LL f JC Fink No. 1554 LARCENY ei HN a 4 4 State A True Bil! t 4 , ae 4 vs LS | Nos. 1583 & 1584 BREAKING, ZNTERING & LARCENY Alice Cloud hal i z sh State Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Pa a — ) ; | ahs vs and capias, Z Wo. 1567 are Bill Ve 3 ia Edward Apmenia Goodnight * State rue Bil He) ee : = il 1 ty is yi G Louise McCree Wi! ! Wo. 1585 LARCENY OF CAR 5 ME i State Nol Pros With Leave. 4 dio. 1500 HIT & RUN a ws} vs :, State Defendant through his attorney John X McLaughlin enters Hea | Donald Junior Ham ie vs a plea of not guilty. C F Bess, LL ae t Mb f Grace white Jury Sworn and empanelled as follows: Jo Smith, Harry Hi Lil Bieta bas iis ak ia ; Cahin35 Honeycutt, L A Bost, J Boyce Brown, J R Gabriel, Kenneth A ih ee Wo. 1440 ASSAULT ITH DEADLY WEAPON. ie Robinson ’ John H Rogers, « A Barnette, J © Holt, OR lills, 2a aa State Defendant enters plea of Not Guilty. The Jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. RUbah a . vs _ Jury Sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of : Prayer for Judgment is continued for aperiod of one . s p Velma }.cose Not Guilty. year fron this date, to-wit, the 30th day of July, 1951, upon &§ < the following conditions: : 5 i 1. That the defendant violate no law of the Stateof Y No. 1577 { LARCENY. : Ne C. during said period. ; E 8 i State A True Bill > That he pay into tae office ofthe vlerk superior vs | Court the sum of 3200.00, from which fund the vlerk shall i Jerry Lee Graham disburse the expenses for the repair of the car ot F6e . Overcash in the sum of 4133.15, and the remainder of Sala id 5900.00 to be applied, first, bo vi Liquidation of tae Wo. 1578 LARCENY we eont and the rema i 1jer is i a l\Ce ; State A True Bill | vs } ) Forest Lee Jétton | Wo. 1587 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State J A True Bill No. 1579 } LARCENY Sylvester NoDaniels 7 | State I A true Bill eo ee | vs Lewis McCoy No. 1588 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY Wa..POK Vi State A True Bill i vs iil JIo. 1591 | FALSE PRETENSE Cl E ! 0 SE PRETEN arence Estes ) — | A True Bill | Arthur D Talbert ) No. 1500 HIT & RUN | State A True Bill t , .; vs 1 il \No. 1575 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Grace White W State A True Bill | 7 Wo. SSAULT ON FEMALE . 0 | Carl S Eller I ca rashes enters a plea of Nolo Contendere pn vs Judgment of the Court is that the lefendant oe ° SIZ | Roosevelt Turner in the common jail of Iredell County tor a perene S 7" Wo. 1571 | LARCENY CaM 38 MONTHS to be assigned to work oeers Soe ee s Ad i Si er . Dp } We miss ” vs. i oe State Highway and Public Works Uo | Leroy Gresham i No. 1575 State vs Carl S Eller W=39 INo. 1516 State vs Lovette | Ca32 No. 1516 State vs > L ’ ose Oro Lovette Roseboro No. 5028 hHoldply Corporation vhair vs Home i.ade Wo. 1554 State vs nex Shaver {=2 2 106 ~~ ><! pee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK #--- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Monday, July 30th, 1951 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere, On the charge of breaking and entering, the of the Court is that the defendant be confined State's Prison at Raleigh, N. ©., for not less nor more than FIVE YEARS. The Court directs that the commitment show that it is the order of this Court that the prisoner be examined for physical ani mental deficiency before being assigned to any labor, ani thereafter to be assigned only to Such labor as he may be found physically and mentally able to perforn ~~ under the otate Highway and Public works Commission, Jud ement in the than THREE Tinty we tld ASSAULT DEADLY WEAPON Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Sam Ingram, James ¢ Shinn, David Isenhour, Everett L Williams, J U Smith, NJ Speece, WT. Bailey, Horace C Neel, lirs Ross Brady, Chavis Renwiek, J i Powell, and H P Honeycutt. Jury returned a verdict of guilty of Assault with Deadly Weapon. STATE'S WITNES@S, William Parsons and Alberta Carson, Jalled and failed. Judgment of the court is that defendants pay 325.00 and cost and Instanter Capias ad Testificandum be issued, ‘ Vefendant through attorney moves that action be contimued, | Motion continuance allowed for the Defendant for the Tern, URIVING Ji litre Judgment of the Court is that the Defendant pay a Fine of 3250.00 and pay the cost. TN THR. SIIPRRTOR CouRT IN THE SUPERIOR court FIRST WEEK «--- AUGUST Tu} Monday, July 30th, 1951 QM * mrp (\t WOOD r Ag T T? THE OTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA mr mre 71 IT) AT ( TT ma IT « rn TO THe SEVERAL COURTS OF THIS STATE: RIAMATTA AT A AY A‘ Setsby Uy DoUN Al ius mn having applied to the COUNCIL CF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR as provided by M, 1951 Vv ae 477 law with the view to being admitted to practice as an ATYONNSY AND COUNSJLLOR AT LAW, in said Courts: We'do certify, that in compliance with an order of the COUNCIL OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR and the provisions of CHAPTER 210, P@LIC LAWS OF 1933 as amended, he is entitled to be so almitted. Given under our hands at Raleigh, the 3rd day of April 1951, /s/__L. 2. Varser | Chairman. /s/__ Geo. B. Greene ___ * Member. /s3/_Xingsland Van Winkle Member. 0 emma /s/ L. T. Hartsell, Jr. Member. /s/ Roy L. Deal _ Member. /s/ Buxton liidvette __Member. /s/ John H. Hall | Member. Secretary. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COU.!TY I, Marcus Leonard Nash, do — ~ @ Constitution of the United States, so he y MF } e miy and sincerely sweal I, Marcus Leonard Nasi, do solemly and sincerely s be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of NorthCarolina, and to tae Const i i ‘ +4 hia} 5 stablis cf he vonstitut Lonal powers and aut horities wnien are or may be establi shed Lor t ~ intai nd defend th Government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain an lefend t ; ae a er ion oe ie vonstitution of the said State, not iconsistent with the Constitution of the Inj Hi ltta n 27 : Ao United States, to the best of my knowledge and ability, so .eip me, God. Marcus Leonard Nash He US _-SOnSi oes I, Mareus Leonard Nash, do swear shat I will truly and honestly demean myself in the vractice of an attorney, according to tne best of my Knowledge and abiltiy, so help me God. Marcus Leonard Nash _. Mr. Mareus Leonard Nash having been introduced to the Court by hire R A yy nT bert A. Collier of Statesville, N. Nash had been licensed to “xaminers of the North Carolina State Bar that lr. c, who presented Certificate xf the Board ¢ ries St Fee Te x Be ar By 5 FO ne rene | 1 | 1 TN THE SUPERTOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK #-----AUGUST TERM, 1951 Monday, July 30th, 1951 : 2 Q, \b Cc her : . f practice the profession of law, the Court thereupon, in open court, administeres » foregoing oaths which are prescribed for Attorneys at Law, and also the oath of alleriance to the State ani to support tre Constitution of the United Ye" States, and orders that ‘lr. Nash be admitted to practice law in all the Counties o the State of North Carolina. The Court further orders that a record of the license and oaths administered be recorded in the Minutes of the Court, Done in open court, this the 390th day of July, 195l. H. Hoyle Sink _ Judge Presiding , vy A “ , This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday liorning, July 31st, 1951, at 9:30 D'clock, This Honorable Court convenes ace July 31st ; 1951. wo. 1498 State vs Wm. Henry Greene Mo. 1573 State vs Merriman Keller flo. 157h State vs Sylvester Car wo. 1589 & 1590 State vs Hugh Bryant Wallace Wo. 1572 State vs Bud Little, Alias Marshall Little fo. 139% State vs Frank N lioore ‘We lo. 1376 State vs J Samuel Brawley No. 1503 State vs Emma Johnson dio. 1516 State vs Lovette Roseboro Wiio. 1516 State vs Lovette Roseboro to, 14,92 State va 1 Bruce Howell FIRST WEEK ---- AUGUST TERM. 1951 Tuesday, July 31st, 1954 79 IN THE SUPERIOR cour? ccordins & vo adjournment on Tuesday RECKLESS DRIVING Continued for State, ASSAULT WITH INTENT Continued ) 7 TT >) aV Wied wary REGQLESS DRIVING Nol Pros With Leave PASSING ON CREST Continued for IF HILL: ot ite. REO 1 ca ) TWTNe Movi Vill Viiv BREAKING & ENTYRING Defendant called Instanter Capias. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and and Laiicdae DRIVING DRUNK. Defendatit through his attorneys J G Lewis and J H Burke enters a plea of nolo contendere. Prayer for judgment continued to llovember Term, of Court. TRANSPORTING LIQUOR Upon tre defendant's complying fully wi » Judgment up to this date ana tue payment of t 0st of the capias, defendant will be disciiarged | the matter continued under former order. POSSEL0 NON]=|TAL 4 al) LI QUOR Defemdant taken on a capias. Let the lefendant be discharged without cost, ba our, finding as a fact that there wag no wilful failure to c oply rith the orders of the Yourt ai processes thereof, and that her yosence was probably due to an error on tie part of counsel, WITNESS - In Case of Lovette ioseboro for AWD W It is ordered by the Court that the former judgment be stricken out and witness, Parson Williams, be discharged upon payment of cost of capias and Sci Fa. WITNESS = In Case of Lovette Roseboro for A WD W It is ordered by theCourt that the former judgment be stricken out and that witness, Alberta Carson, be discharged upon payment of cost of capias and Sci Fa. TRANSPORTING & POSSESSING NON-TAX PATD LIQUOR. dant enters a plea of NOT GUILTY. kamen of the Vourt is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of (2) TWO YEARS to be assigned to such labor on the State Highway an Public Works Commission as he may be found physically able to perform after medical examination. It appearing to the Court that the defendant was in possession of and operating a motor vehicle that had been {llegally equipped @o as to greatly enhance the power and “speed, the Court finding as a fact that the mechanism 80 tructed may be of use to the law enforcement officers of Iredell County, orders and directs that said motor be separated from the remainder of the motor equipmait and (Continued on next page) | iniiitlihiti ‘ de a * oh ule ih ae SIR BET nT oe r " PAS ae ae see SR RT EE aE EY ETT ITE JNo. 1492 State | vs (yoRyee Howell | No. 1591 State i vs | Arthur D. Talbert | WeM-=/,1. sb VNo. 1499 State vs Slayton Campbell Cml2 “Wo. 1503 State vs imma Johnson C- 40 \ No. 1494 State vs James Wm. Campbell W=26 gon 1577, 1578 s 1579 State vs Jerry Lee Graham Forest Lee Jetton er McCoy —< IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK e--- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Tuesday, July 31st, 1951 TRANSPORTING AND POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR (Continued from page 479) turned over to the High Sheriff of Iredell Coun in the enforcement of the law, and that the rem ty for use se : : ainder of said motor equipment be sold aS provided by statute and the proceeds applied accordingly in the usual manner 4 FALSE PRETENSE Defendant enters plea of not guilty. Jurv sworn and-empanelled-as follows: David Isenhour Everette L-Williams, L C Bunch. J C Smith: N J Speece, WM Bailey,-Horace C Neel, Mrs Ross Bradv. J M Powell, JR Gabriel. H © Noneveutt & Chavis Renwick; and returne: a verdict of GUILTY as charged. Judgment a’ the Court is that the defendant be confined at State's Prison at Raleieh, N. C. for not less than Tw nor more than FOUR YEARS to be assigned to hard labor as provided by law. Upon the coming in of the verdict the defendant moves to set the same aside for errors assigned and to be assigned and as being against the greater weight of the evidence, Motion denied. =xception. Upon the pronouncement of jul gment the defendant again excepts in-open court and gives ndice of appeal to the Supreme Court, the State's counsel waiving further notice. The defendant, appellant, shall be allowed 30 days to make and serve case on appeal, counsel represent- ing the State, appellee, shall be allowed 15 days there- after to serve countercase or file exceptions. Appeal bond in the sum of 450.00 is adjudged sufficient. The Court directs that the defendant be held in appear- ance bond of $2500, same to be approved by the High Sheriff of Iredell County and be justified. POSSESSION AND SALE Defendant enters a plea of nolo contenkre, Judcement of the Court is that the defendant pay a fine of 50.00 and cost. POSSESS NONeTAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant enters plea of guilty. : Judgment of the Yourt is that the defendant be confined in Women's Division of State's Prison for a period of né less than 6) SIX nor more than (10) TEN MONTHS to be assigned to such labor as provided for women, ¢ TRANSPORT & POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant enters plea of nolo contendere. Fl Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confine in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of | ion EIGHTEEN MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervis+ of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Thi , sentence to run concurrently with a former sentence impose on him in Rowan County. LARCENY & RECEIVING Vefendants enter a plea of NOT GUILTY. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of not guilty. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK #-- AUGUST TixM 1951 Tuesday, July 31st, 1954 Wo. 1571 LARCENY & RECEIVING State Defendant enters plea of NOT GUILTY. vs Jury sworn and empanelled. Leroy Gresham It appearing to the Court that the defendant C~ is now represented by counsel in matter which was not known by court, court in its discretion withdraws a Juror and orders mistrial, No. 1571 LARCENY & RECEIVING State Jury sworn and empanelled. vs The Court in its discretion withdraws a Juror and Leroy Gresham orders a mistrial and notifies councellor and defendant | that case be detained for such action as may be taken by } Solicitor. SECRET Mio. 1587 / ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL Atate Defendant enters plea of NOT GUILTY. vs Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: N E Brown, Everette Sylvester McDanielsy, Williams, N J Speece, Wi Bailey, Horace © Neel, Mrs. Ross . We 2¥ Brady, J M Powell, H P Honeycutt, Chavis Renwick, 0 i Mills, Sk W P Morrison, J R Gabriel. dae : Jury returned a verdict of guilty of Assault With Deadly Weapon. , i Judgment of the court is that the defendant be confined | din State's Prison for a period of not less than THREE nor more than FIVE YEARS to be assigned to hard labor as provided by law. SECRET ink f io. 1588 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL State Defendant enters plea of NOT GUILTY. vs Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: N & Brown, overette Clarence Estes Williams, N J Speece, W M Bailey, Horace Neel, rs. ee . Wes Brady, J li Powell, H P Honeycutt, Chavis Renwick, O R Mills, or, W P Morrison, J R Gabriel. : i 3 Jury returned a verdict of guilty of Assault With Deadly apon a " * Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined So in State's Prison at Raleigh, N. C. for a period of net — than SEVEN nor more than TEN YEARS to be assigned to hare labor as provided by law. ———— JGRANT JURY REPORT --- AUGUST TERM, 1951 IREDELL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT with all members present. We The Grand Jury met August 30, 1951 omplaints that came before us. investigated and passed on all bills and c , s County Jail and Prison We visited the County Home, County Court House, y Camp. Upon visiting the County Home we feel the need of an outside fire escape on the Central building. Otherwise everything in good condition. 1 All living quarters were clean and in sanitary condition. There are 14 one colored man, and 9 colored white women inmates, 16 white men inmates, women inmates. d men Prison help on the farm consisted of 3 white men and 2 colore ‘ ; , heir and one colored woman. Like to commend Mr. & Mrs, Sherrill for t wonderful work, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Tuesday, July 3lst, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK «== AUGUST TERM, 1951 Wednesday, August lst, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday ’ County Jail - All repairs which were recommended by the Grand Jury August 1, 1951. } of the May Term of Court are being taken care of now, And in very good ] condition. There are 2 white women, 19 white men and Mio. 1432 MANSLAUGHTER : » 19 wi 9 colored men, State Continued for State. The Grand Jury inspected the Prison Camp. And found 102 prisoners into Dawes Crouch | ® v | All buildings are in excellent condition. We highly commend the i | superinendent and personnel on their orderly way of keeping the prison in 3 Wo. 1543 MURDER | State Continued for S 1 | excellent condition. vs _ Wil Gaston Tuck Sr. th | J. C, Murdock i, oreman ot the Grand Jury hy | Milo. 1570 LARCENY ih | | State Defendant through his attaney John R McLaughlin Ne | vs enters a plea of guilty as charged in Bill of Indictment. it | Dennis Gresham Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be cone it | C22 fined in the Common Jail Iredell County for a period af ) EIGHTEEN MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended and the defendant is hereby placed on probation for a period of 2 years under the supervision of N. C. Probation Commission. | No, 1571 LARCENY | State Defendant through his attorney John 8 McLaughlin vs enters a plea of guilty to the misdemeanor of Receiving Leroy Gresham C=3 Wo, 1463 MURDER sald? State Solicitor for the State does not ask for of vs Murder; “Defendant through his attarney enters a plea of Russell Waugh W=53 stolen goods knowing the same to have been stolen. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTSEN MONTHS to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Com- mission. This sentence is suspended and the defendant is hereby placed on probation for a period of TWO YEARS under the supervision of the N. C. Probation Commission. guilty of manslaughter, which plea the State accepts. Judgment of the Vourt is that the defendant be con- fined in State's prison av Raleigh, N. ©. for a period of not less than VHREE nor more than FIVE YEARS to be assigned to hard labor as provided by law. fio. 1522 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY —— Defendant enters a plea of Guilty to Larceny of — meat valued at less than $50.00. Clemott Bennett C=26 Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of NINTY DAYS to be assigned to work on tie roads under the supervision of State Highway and Public works Commission. : . : aa The defendant to go upon his present bond; cafias | commitment to issue on the first day of December, 1951, for the service of his sentence. The sentence of 90 days is given on condition that the deft return to the owner of the meat one ham and one middling vh ich he says he now, has in his smokehouse. -¢” on? a « z ' “Ho. 1562 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY State No} Pros With Leave. vs JC Fink 7, oe BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY — Nol Pros With Leave. vs This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, August 18%, | 1951, at 9:30 O'clock. 17 Lin —— . f —_— at ‘ . i a al aiaatieis om P i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -e-- aUGUST TERM, 1951 Wednesday, August 1, 1951 No. 1583 | BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY State { vs Edward Apmenia Goodnight No. 1584 State vs Edward Armenia Goodnight O. 1448 ge vs Pete Shoemaker Kio. 1449 State vs James (Pete) Shoemaker JNo. 1542 State vs Cecil Mayhew We Wo. 1494 ~ NORTH CAROLINA, IREDSLL COUNTY. State, vs James William Campbell, This case coming on to Judge of the Superior Court at the July Term, 1951, of Iredell Superio and it appearing to the Court that the defendant entered a ple to a charge of possessing and transporting 12 gallons of non-tax~ and judgment was pronounced in said case; and it furt.er appearing to th that the defendant above named used a 1936 4-door Dodge Sedan in trans said liquor, andthat said car is now being held by the Ired Department; Nol Pros With Leave. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCBNY Nol Pros With Leave. POSSESS LIQUOR In this case the Court void, not having been signed. POSSESS LIQUOR Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in Common Jail of period of SIX MONTHS to be roads under supervision of Works Commission. Capias and commitment holds that the warrant is Action dismissed, Iredell County for a assigned to work on State Highway and Public to issue on the first day of November, 1951, for the enforcement of the prison sentence herein imposed. The Court further orders that he pay the cost of this action on or before the first day of November, 1951. ATTEMPTED RAPE. Defendant enters a plea of Guilty of Assault on Female, which plea the State accepts. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be comfined in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWENTY MONTHS to be assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State High- way and Public Works Commission as provided by law, and pay the cost of this action. Capias and commitment to issue for the enforce- ment of the prison sentence herein at any time within two years from this date, to-wit the first day of " August, 1951, upon the defendant's molesting, 4880 ing with or having anything whatever to do with his step-daughter, to-wit, Vorothy Overcash. SESE eg na Ne an a Rae ere rae eae THE SUPERIOR COURT. be heard and being heard before the undersigned r Court, a of nolo contendere paid liquor, e Court porting ell County sheriff's IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --— AUGUST TR} i, 1951 Wednesday, August 1, 1951 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said 1936 4-door Dodge Sedan Automobile, Notor No. De244530, Serial No. 40568é6, License No. 490962, and Title No. 2738655, be advertised and sold at public auction to the highest bidder for cash as provided by law, and that the proceeds derived from the said sale be disbursed as prescribed by law. Done this the lst day of jugust, 1951. y} ) and This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, August «nd, 1951, at 9:30 O'clock. | | August 2nd, 1951. The following were sworn as Talesmen Jurors for the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Thursday, August 2, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjourmment on Thurslay B © Week, T. 0. Morrison, A M Wiensham, Thomas Boyd, Tom Hill and ENG MeCoy, dio. 1466 State vs Clarence Baxter Ao. 1419 State Vs David Franklin Smith YNo. 1592 State vs Arthur R Cheek W=-69 No. 1593 State vs Ida Gregory in32 /No. 1580 State vs James Sipes INo. 1312 State vs Charles E MecLelland Wo. 1457 State vs Paul Revere Plyler. ae OPERATING GAMBLING HOUSE Nol Pros With Leave RECKLESS DRIVING Nol Pros With Leave FORNICATION & ADULTERY Defendants through their attorney enter a plea of NOT GUILTY. Jury Sworn and empanelled and retumed a verdict of NOT GUILTY. BAD CHECK Appeal to Superior Court dismissed. ASSAULT wITH DEADLY WEAPON The Court being of the opinion that under the judgment of the Court providing the payment of two funds by the defendant and further providing that he should violate no law of the state, and upon these three conditions te sentence should be suspended, This Court is of the opinion that as a matter of law the Vourt has no authority to invoke the suspended sentence upon the respondent's hav- ing failed to pay in the funds for the disbursement of . the hospital of the injured party nor upon the respondent's failure to pay into the office of the Clerk Superior Court the sum of }200,00 for the benefit of the injured ; party, the Solicitor for the District advising thevourt an the Clerk of the Court advising the Court that the costs have been paid as ordered, and that no criminal offense has been shown against the respondent, the v¥ is of the opinion that the suspended sentence cannot be invoked at this time, and continues the matter under former order. BASTaRDY ' The Court finds as a fact that the defendant 238 | wilfully failed to comply with the orders of =” and orders capias and commitment to issue. The your orders that capias and commitment shall be held in obeyance pending such time as defendant may fail to comply with the orders and directions of tne we a Sheriff of Iredell County or leave the premises : ner jail of Iredell Vounty. The Court orders the err into the custody of the High Sheriff for such Nae he may be directed to perform in behalf of the County of Iredell under said Sheriff and Jailer. Wo. 1503 State vs Emma Johnson Alo. 1383 State vs Jack Alexander We22 Alo. 1516 ; State A Lovette Roseboro Milo. 1523, 1524 & 1525 State vs Walt Coffer PItoT weuk --- AUGUST TERM, 1951 487 PL Pe Pa oe pa —_——_= IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Thursday, August 2nd, 1951 POSSESS NONeTAX PAID LIQUOR This prisoéner may be assigned to work in and about the vounty Home under the su-ervision of the Superintendant thereof so long as she shall remain on the premises and comply with the orders and directions of the Superintendent. Upon failure go to do, commitment to issue. FORGERY It appearing to the vourt, and the vourt finding as a fact that upon the respondent's own admissions in Court that the said respondent was tried and convicted in Municipal Court in the vity of Mooresville, Iredell County, N. &., on a charge of laresny and given a sentence of two years in the jail of Iredell County to be assigned to work on the roads, the vourt finding that such conviction justifies the conclusion that the respondent has wilfully violated the terms ot suspension oi the sentence of 12 months imposed at the August Term, 1950, oi the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, as recorded in /-inute Book 29, page 168, nd upon such findings of fact the Sourt orders and directs that the judgment of 12 months in prison referred to iereinabove shall be made effective and shall begin upon the lawful termination »f the two years sentenee imposed in the Municipal Vourt, that is to say, that this sentence now invoked shall run consecutively with the two years sentence referred to above, and not concurrently. St NRA iia EEE 8 pes. ape mma ea a Se ee iia a) al aa a ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON a a Prayer for judgment continued ior a period of ONE YEAR from vhis date, to-wit, the 2nd dy of August, 1951, } e~Tlowine conditions: upon the following condit:ons: : | : : 1. That he pay a fine ot 6100.00 and the coste — 2 That he violate no lawoi the state during said period . ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ae These three cases are consolidated for trial. J G Lewis Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty, through attorney Motion of Non-Suit allowed on Felony Vharge of wre < wad) Assault With Intent to “1s -. ee ee r JURY Sworn and empanelled as ollows: W A aaraes _- Holt, J C Smith, © ¥ Bess, L L Sherill, 1 A ee “ve . WM Bailey, David Isenhour, Horace » ileel, i J R Gabriel. The jury returned a verdict of eases a6 at eeS. the judgment of the Vourt is that — i defendant be confined in the Common sath of teen in oF for a period of TWsLVi MONTHS to be ass gne a oe about tae County remises he gtd t 1 °1523, er tte Court is that the defendant be cated in the Common Jail of Iredell County = sia 4 of TWELVE MONTHS to be assigned to wo rk on | 2 ier te supervision of state Highway and ceelcuash t. ‘ ic Capias and con comet iie the ee esanrt aa": ug pantense of imprisonment at a ti within three years from this date, to-wit ot fA : st, 1951, upon the defendant's failure to a ae ny rom this ate the Cres, ce ee 7 4 ibe wi companion cases, 2524 Ti rections of the High Sheriff oo cee et po the services waile in jail of said owe bo a violating any law of the state of N. Ceo ted or upon his 1524 prayer for jukment continued for @ pe is _ Baa from chis date, to-wit, the 2nd day of August, ” iy tne Mil of Cost to be taxed in cased. guilty in all three IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Thursday, Ausust 3rd, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WiiK --- AUGUST BRM, 1951 Monday, August 6th, 1951 SESS TAX PAID LIQUOR IN PLACE OF BUSIN No. 1490 & 1491 PO IESS No : SED AS RESIENCE. 2 Mor State U Gi : } vs Continued. NORTH CAROLINA, IN TH SUPERIOR COURT | i | Pa D % W i TIATram no rc | Paul Dewey White IREDELL COUNTY. AUGUST Tits, 1951 i vo mvenes according to adjournment on l.onday No. 1555 HIT & RUN This Honorable Vourt convenes accc 2 y State Continued. ; | : 95 0: ' with Honorable H. Hoyle Sink } vs Morning, August 6th, 1951 at 10:00 Otclock, wita Honorable H. Hoy ; Ce | John Lee Johnson : sai sl al oe eae a ae . 1 aaa d H Jine Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District i y Judge Presiding ane Holding vour > v Ju i} | ae an 1 LR \ TW. o ADnra A Wa? } - 7. 7 yresent ai of i’* ? oh me aos o i 4 | No. 1556 NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE Fall Term, 1951, 1 HN) State Continued Wseh Shariff Trade] inter reburnms into opera Jourt ia ; vs : ; 3. GC. Rumple, High sneritr of ireces! Oe eee : RL Ht + Ce 1 i John Lee Johnson ‘ eee ae ine oe ee Hy the nae Tollowing good and lawful men to rve as jurors for tis one at} No. 1557 POSSESS TAX PAID LIQUOR, BLDG. NOT USED AS DWELLING ot eet tame 951. Iredell Sounty Superior Court, to-wit: | | State a : ? —_——orne Qa nd eek of tne Aususu 12. lily 1 Jay irea = Seer y ‘ } od = Continued, & second wees . | Bed vs 7 ij Fred Junior Lackey F ; a > Darr ’ R. Ge CALHOUN* Mirse be Us. .nlte J ' : ? e NOY / | I a y sl I iL ee SUE ner / / ~ hier ; OS TA We . Br dford . No. 1558, 1559 LARCENY G. Be Uo WALT ~ a & 1560 Continued. si atin A. Fuller Sams, Jr. otate a Sloop We Ge AUSU vs oe Murdock a Mrs Ne. W. Foxy a. G. Svans ve oa .. Nocll 5S. Lentz 4 7 . J Be arle NOCLL ° > of ¥W . Woe 1561, 1562 j LARCENY be Se Boyer i D- ‘ : s Ilha j “iC & 1563 Continued, pee \. D. Rogers Dan Krider otate s N. L. Boggs vs ; wicca H. V. Lineberger , 1 P. Moo J W Horne . - Lillie Cloud Allen P. Moore i Marray C. Morris T. O. Hager illenry it, Sunch aa ay we ts Wo. 1564, 1565, LARCEN s . Minor Ao Lentz & 1566 Continued. Robert L. Gaither Fred E. Herrin State ; ee R. A. Lowery Vs Mrs. C. A. Bolick Je Re Wilson Alice Cloud 1a ,Oul tVe \ f ko R. G. Calhoun was out of tie vous No. 1567, 1568 if { LARCENY ‘ ; “- , e used by Countye + 1509 Continued, Mrs. N. We Fox was excused by J state : or J. R. Wilson was not returned. Louise }.cCree | . ” wre Wer 3ta tute L. G. Turner was excused by 2tavul&e a aru Qo f, . DVN " y > ; [73¢ te DISP voit OF MORTGAGE PROPERTY = Murdock was excused by Dr.'s yertii i . 4 i Wo. 1576 S“ate vs John Moss LO i >¢ . ~e@ novanue - 7 i nea a4 l ba 8 b aI ned 5) tA de = a women constitute wna + . ‘ 4 The following men ane . { . Ostwalt Le Qe Sloop, BE. &. Boyer, ar , as the D4 . Jury #1 to-wit: B. G. US ’ WO 1536 as vune ivor ce u dou , State | POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR. + Worris, Robert L. Gaither, rs. Ve Ke ; , : : . i + } h Y Ve +. > ; ys Continued, N. ea BOSss, Al len P e Moore, Murray ~ vans : is : -" i YY, wVan Hattie Simpson { w.§. Bradford, We Ce Austin and &. U . Bolick Mrs i Os white, We We Dp ’ . . + Wo. 1548 ‘ i | AID & ABSTT IN SPSEDING vs Continued, Talmadge Walter Combs No. 1465 j State j vs | | Troy Fesperman SPEEDING Continued, - °*® 1 This onorable vourt takes t 6 9 . K a reces 4 y Morni Augus ’ Sl, at 10:00 O'clock, s until Monday ng, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -+- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Thursday, Auzust 3rd, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEK --- AUGUST ERM, 1951 Monday, August 6th, 1981 No. 1490 & 1491 POSSESS TAX PAID LIQUOR IN PLACE OF BUSINESS Not State USED AS RESIENCE. ae eee ne vs Continued. NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Paul Dewey White | | ' so aR an ts ka "cht rn IREDELL COUNTY. AUGUST Tat, 1951 | ® : ; 5 rant ny } av ; | , +s Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Monday | 14 ‘No. 1555 HIT & RUN This State Continued 51 ' ie is ‘in U. Baeke Stak F , a Lue h. 1951 at 10:00 O'clock, with Honorable H. Hoyle Sink, | vs Morning, August 6th ’ 195 ’ . J | i 1258 Se Sore Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of this ta ‘ifteenth Judicial District i \ 5 * % ie JT 9a ‘ATQ . Fail T 1951 pre sent in pre id) Se | | No. 1556 NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE Fall Term, ’ State C inue ae as ne ko wecnek Snes On % | “ ontinued,. a 85 Rumple, High sheriff o ireaet ,ounty reuirns I | John Lee Johnson e tip Pollowing good and lawful men to eve as jurors for this the the naues 02290205 & ; No. 1557 POSSESS TAX PAID LIQUOR LDG. NOT USED AS DWELLIN _ a er Se eer to-wit: ° SSESS A QUOR, B « NOT USED AS DWELLING, - 1 Week of the August Term, 1951, Iredell County Superior yourt, & it: State Continued. Second weex oO wih G ’ vs Fred Junior Lackey a. Ge CALHOUN' Mrs. L. 0. White J. H. Varr ihe Ue Ves 4 - [I 3 Orr L. G. Turner bh rc i : . OS TWA We 3 Bradford ate Ue 4 No. 1558, 1559 LARCENY G. Be Yo [WALT ’ = ™ & 1560 Continued. ie : <n n A. Fuller Sams, Je otate a Ge Sloop ne Wes aAUuSUII vs , : 7 Qn n . ; , il dock Lottie Bell Cloud Mrs Ne W. Foxy A. G. Svans PF, L. Mur 6 E. E. Boyer J. B. Harle Noell 5. Lentz WO. 1561, 1562 | LARCENY sai iia & 1563 Continued. “ Tepes A. D. Rogers Dan Kride state N. L. Boggs — Lineberger lide Alien P. Moore J W Horne ts Ve oe - Lillie Cloud F Allen P,. Moc * ; Ls ) 2 + 5 Murray C. Morris T. 0. Hager lenry ,. Suncn an ” Ly +«@ é _ Wo. 1564, 1565, LARCEN ; ; Oe usnor A, Lente & 1566 Continued. Robert L. Gaither Fred E. Herrin < & state R. A. Lowery vs Mrs. C. A. Bolick Je Re Wilson ' Alice Cloud r' 2 > unty y R. G. Calhoun was out of tice vous Z Ad No. 1567, 1565 | LARCENY + & ‘ : > 7 ; . 11S a bv U uU 1UYe = — Continued, ; MrSe Ne We rOx was excusec . ¢ 9tate = J. R. Wilson was not returned. Louise }:cCree L. G. Turner was excused by Q Wo. 1576 , DISPOSE OF MORTGAGE PROPERTY T4- : ; J ate Continued. . vs a; nat snall herei ifter be termed ] I ‘ net 4 tut, q U tA LL , , saadiateala The following men and women constitute wi ee oO - . Murdock was excused oY "= tt an Slo BE. EB. Boyer B. G. Ostwalt, Le “4 Sloop, %- —* No. 1586 aati oa ee as the Divorce Jury #1, to-wit: i ke ae . POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR. ; t L, Gaither, “FSe ve “e state fi i : “ ra 9 CG. ] orris, moi ervu ~* 3 ys Continued, N. L. Boggs, Allen P. Moore, Murray EVANS e Austin and &. Ge H £ Chu - | | | e o t } : R adford ie Ve Bolick, Mrs. L. O. White, "+ »» bra , Wo. 1548 | State vs Talmadge Walter Combs AID & ABETT IN SPEEDING Continued, Wo. 1465 State vs Troy Fesperman SPEEDING Continued, August 5 This Honorable Court tak Monday Morning 1951, at 10:00 O'clock. akes a recess until Monday ; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --= AUGUST TERM, 1951 Monday, August 6th, 1951 VNo. 5052 Joyce Geraldine Brooks DIVORCE The Jivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and vs empanelied answers the issues submitted to it as follows: ny chester ©. Brooks North Carolina In the Superior Vourt Iredell County. August Term, 1951. Joyce Geraldine Brook vs Brooks Were the plaintiff and the defendant married and are now husband and wife, as set out in the Complaint? Yes _, answer ad Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredall County, North Varolina, for a period of six months imiediately prior to the comnencenent of this action? answer abe lived separate and apart from her prior to the coin answer North Carolina In the Superior vourt, Iredell County. Aucust Term 1951. Joyce Geraldin Vs JUDG) ENT vhester ©. Brooks This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before his Honor H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by tieCourt, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «--- AUGUST Tut, 1951 Monday, August 6th, 1951 pe ) a (> mas ow + hw ; iged by the Court that the o she plaintiff, Joyce > ka + and th oro IAD, oe ana tne game are hereby dissolved is granted an absolute 7 i ae i divoree from the defendant. He Hoyle 5ink JU IGE i noo Ly (G Moe 5063 Thomas V. Davidson vs inswers Mary Davidson NORTH CanOLINA IRSDVELL COUNTY Thomas V. Davidson vs Mary Davidson 1. Were the plaintif! Complaint? Answer. Yes iff upart from Have the plaintiii ana shis action? 4-5 otner for Answer. ix months defendant ° lnuediately preceding the comuencenent om Answer. Yes vi IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA H THE, WPERLTOR, oF IREDELL COUNTY Thomas V. Davidson JUDGMENT vs Mary Davidson to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding This cause coming on to 06 * and the jury having ‘ntiff and against th answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plainti | aii perior Court and a jury, the recular term of Iredell Su IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK e-=< aUGUST Tink, 19§1 Monday, August 6th, 1951 IN THE SUPER { eget arnt a SECOND WEEK mame AUGU defendant, as appears in the record; ie North Carolina in the superior vourt A ae It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonde ap : ’ } 5, ) » JUGE At INAS of Tredell County | aarciace heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant } a ia. g £ I d dant be, and Mabel Gibson Robbins the same are hereby dissolved and set aside, and the plaintiff is granted an vs JUDGiNT absolute divorce from the defendant. Carl Franklin Robbins ari = . ; It is furtnuer ordered tat the plainti | H. Hoyle Sink | JOE PasstyiNe, This catise coming on to be heard before ilonorabdle il, ‘loyle vink, Ke D . 43 » 4 IG Vs a4] Yay 1 Tredol ynerior " el 4 Judge Presiding over the august vivil term 1951 Iredell superior rt, and i RW | heine heard before said Honorable H, loyle sink, and a vury, tae 1oliow ng PN koa | we ele ih | ee I id! 1 i ? © te te ] '. . T eure | i a 3 i issues were submitted to tic vury: As : i | | 1 Has the plainti?? bee i t State o yrta var7o.ina c x ae * 2 kee ¥ ° ao ; i oa aatst an? Basi for more than six montns next rec , ULbU ; his action? ih) } | i \ ny enade as sl bas — oa ike : Pa ‘es No. 5085 2 Were the plainti! nd defendant marriea as alleged in , , HY e s z i { , — ea = niaint? | ie hiabél Gibson Nobbins {| DIVORCE — Wipie bt mn s - 7 , Doms ctv - . . " } } The JVivoree Jury £1" being duly sworn a ai hin piel > lef 3° ‘ Live y red | ; = = . , ne inane a ee oe " = ee ys , % . Ww S «0 moh ive . Hy ; vs { empanellied answers the issues submitted to it de r 7 i ai i, as “ollows: ‘ tne the institution haa) . a oe genarate and apart ec inuously for two years next preceling the institubion Aa Carl Franklin Robbins ea ee ee , TRL Es North Carolina In the Superior VJourt avan: ¥ Judge Presiaing answer. ies ’ . } | eazi4 ieean e | : T ee Mee. T vy having answered ali of Said issiles a Iredell County The Jury having an MRT see that Bit) ih i It is, therefore, by tue yours .* ; aT ET ks abel Gibson Robbins | - ore Mee 2 y . ” t To) a fe ae eS LaTTpe the bonds of matrimony ereto.o 1S Oe uw _—— : he a f VS. I55UES . : . ee 2 force ee lefendant be forever dissolved, 1 itcsniinel : : Way url Franklin Robbins P this TRG } s , m-ranklin Rob! } : G y L lS ie ie a vineulo from the defendant, Sarl “rankiin nQvvAlie, {ag if 7? ‘ . . _”* : . , . > £ ‘ le Has the plaintif yeen a resident or the State of North varolina ce er. vw the Clerke A action be taxed against the plain y oa W q for more than six montis next preceding the institution of this action: ve i] H. Hoyle Oink sa Whi a iW “Tr yal / 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint: Answer: Yes a ro * Oe ‘ A ’ rc t ew i 3- were the plaintiff and defendant separated and nave tue lived )IVORCE a fhe Divorce Jury /i° 0C4ng * separate and apart continuously for two years next preceding the insti» ubson 1 answers e issues submi | ey é swer: Vis 2 sinane | elip iné VS. a3 ~>LlLows: Maggie Bass Parker Answer: Yes sor Cour In the Superior Sourt, Pi T 4 P i say ; ' - ~ i North Carolina, August Term, 1951 Iredell County \iiiaimciniiaivninidaiaie Thomas T. Parker, | Plaintiff, | I3SUES Vs. haggie Bass Parker, { | : ; Deferiant ! ane Sntermarry, and are they now jefendant inv rma le Did the plaintiff and ‘nt? ‘ or 3 4n the complaint: husband ani wife, as alleged in b's : ” v at . ee | af ic} qtner and endant para te irom e@ACN OWVlSsy defendant sep 2, Did the plaintiff and apart from each other for more than two years 1 . 1 have they lived separate 214) » Se a. re Sal IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK ee-- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Monday, August 6th, 195 continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer YuS 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident o of North Carolina for more than six months prio this action? Answer YS tT WDD > octet WUE ERIOR + Tr - ,TINTIAam >? ‘ Lie ob AUGUST 7 itis, 195 Thomas Bass Parker, Defendant This cause co uperior Court of Ired younty, orth Carolina, Sink, Judge Preising > of the plaintiff and against 6 2e bonds of and H. Hoyle Sink “JUDGE PilsslJING Motion made by R. A. Collier member of the local Bar and duly seconded that all cases on the Civil Calendar be moved up to Monday's Calendar and set for trial after the cases calendared for Monday, other than the cases calendared for trial on Tuesday, 4 Bs nal c e ae ee oe ae @ 4 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WESK e-—. AUGUST TE M, 1951 Monday, august 6th, 1951 flo. 5093 Ethel Cashion Campbell DIVORCE Tyrer trae Kak oe = = eury sivorn } yA ipanell cdas follows: B. G. Ostwalt L. G. Sloop, — E Boyer, N. L. Boggs, Allen P Moore, Murray C Morris, Robert L Gaither, Mrs C A Bolick, Mrs LO White, WS Bradford, WC Austin & R G Evans. ? 4% Juror NCe, al Rickett Imber, Hutchins Bryan trading ioing business under the partnership name of Fish Constructors This cause comings at a term being held on the date judge of the Superior Court of Iredell County ‘ } Lsnwe and matters at issue and in Set forth below, and it appearing that the things and matters a Ss settled by an agreement whereby , . Bae hao iuly Controversy between the parties nave been duly rainst them in the sum the def ane wine ‘dement may be entered again tnem i efendants have consented that judgmen may o V , and t e@ p j t j as a re a S j al L j n full ee tt 1 ment named belo v a h pl ain 3 ff has ¢° ed to acce} % saiac «< moun i Seé e i‘ LI f d ara hic! r now as or m™m iy hereai ter have, all : a i 18 ° every nature an ch re c er Ww n ne Ow h “J j et ern rn < If nst re e : § t 7 € on O ‘ ne things h Ow known ° Oo , € gai tr d fendants } f re s matters alleged in the complaint; inti j his action is a minor And it further appearing that tue plaintiff in this act S re f ing danag leged ecovering damages al and that said action was brought for the purpose of r ; , 2 injuries receive to have been suffered by the plaintiff on account ol personal j ef erence to tne nature, ; in r having heard evidence and investigated the facts in ference to tie manner in character and extent of the alleged injuries and also in ref vestigation finds as a fact that the Which said injuries were received, upon eveh in d for the best interests of said minor = sie Settlement mentioned above is fair an IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WIEK == AUGUST TERM, 1951 Monday, August 6th, 1954 hereby approves same; NOW, THiREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendants the sum of five thousand dollars (35,000.00) together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This 6th day of August, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink Presiding Judge We consent: Rollie C,. Johnson Plaintiff J. Chester Johnson ~ Next Friend Zeb V. Turlington Attorney for Plaintiff C, H. Gover Attorney for Vefendants Wo. 4973 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL Raymond Simalton, By His Next Friend, Frank B. Simalton, Plaintiss, JUDGMENT -VSs- Gilbert Sarabia, ee Defendant. THIS CAUSE Coming on to be heard, and being heard, by theundersimed Judge Presiding at the August 6, 1951, term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the parties hereto have agreed to settle, compromise and adjust all matters and things in controversy herein by the payment by the defendant to the plaintiff of the sui of Three Hundred, Three ($303.00) Dollars, together with the costs of this action, in full, final and complete settkment and satisfaction ofall matters and things in controversy herein, and the Court, after making due inquiry we the manner in which the cause of action arose and the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff, being of the opinion and finding 4§ ntiff a fact that the said settlement is to the best interest of the minor plai and the amount of said settlement constitutes fair, just and reasona ble compensé- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, August 6th, 195 tion for the injuries sustained by him; IT IS, THSkEFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDEKMD AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Tiree Hundred, Three ($303.00) Doilars, together with the costs of this action, in full, final and complete settlement and satisfaction of all matters and things in controversy herein. It appearing to the Court that the charges or Dr. G. W. Taylor, o7 Mooresville, N. &., for medical and surgical services rendered to the minor plaintiff, in the amount of Sixty ($60.00) Dollars, have not been paid, the Clerk of the Court is directed to -ay directly to the said Dr. C. «, Taylor the sum of Sixty ($60.00) Dollars in payment of his bill for services rendered the minor plaintiff out of the recovery herein. It further appearing to the Court that there are unpaid charges of Lowrance Hospital, Inc., of Mooresville, N. C., in the amount of Ninety-three ' ; 13 ervices furnis h inor (303.00) Dollars for hspital and medical services furnished the mino plaintiff for the treatment of his injuries, the Clerk of Court is directed to pay directly to Lowrance Hospital, inc., the sum of Ninety-three (393.00) Dollars out of the recovery herein. A fee of $50.00 dollars is approved for the Honorable George 4. “orrow : . . nk hina le ae nlainuiff, and the Clerk of the for his services in representing tne minor plain 9 : : : a. ly he said Goerge A. Morrow from Court is directed to pay said sum directly to tue Se 6 the recovery herein in payment for his services. t taxed by the Ylerk of the Court The defendant will pay the costs to be taxed by th lerk oi - This the 6th day of August, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink JUDGE PReEOLDING WE CUNSENT: Frank B,. Simalton Next Friend George A. Morrow... Attorney for the plaintiff SMATHERS & CARPENTER BY L. B. Carpenter ttorneys for the Defendant. een08 088 5 * 9% x % SECOND WEEK === AUGUST TEN, 1952 497 perro a en ——" a ts See. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --=- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Monday, August 6th, 1951 cil ae SUPERIOR COURT S e--- AUGUST Term, 1951 Wy Tuesday, August 7th, 1951 7 499 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday | YNo. 4906 William B McGraw vs Mildred Nantz McGraw --------- Continued | | ' Morning, August 7th, 1951. | No. 5012 Elva Bass vs Frank BaSS e-------9--~~--8-+~+> += ==-Continued | No. 5045 Allan F Campbell vs Lena O Campbell -------------- Continued | No. 4762 WW Goodrum vs Vera L Goodrum -----~-------------- Continued Mo. 4993 Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: J B Earle, A D Rogers, J W Horne, T O Hager, Fred E Herrin, A Fuller Sams, Jr., Noell S Lentz, Dan Krider, AV Lineberger, Henry R Bunch, Minor A. Lentz, R A Lowery Thomas F McKay No. &901 Joe D Raymer vs Thomas W Griffin & Mrs Thomas W Griffin-Continued ‘No. 5029 Mack R Walker vs Annie Mae Johnson <--------------Cont inued vs No. /No. 4710 CB Myers & Wife vs D O Cowan, Jr et al -----~~-~~- Cont inued 5050 JC Grant vs John Henry Parker ---------~---------- Continued James E Gilleland Cee aaa = fio. 4711 C B Myers & Wife vs W B Crowson & Wife et al -----Continued The jury stating they were unable to agree, The Court, acting in its discretion, withdraws a juror and orders a mistrial. Case continued. NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM, 1951 No. 4904 C A Mayhew A | : vs | JUDGMENT Sam Mayhew j This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Judge H. Hoyle Sink and being heard and it appearing that the plaintiff and defendant have defendant for $600.00 and the cost agreed that judgment be taken against the of the action. It is therefofe ordered and ad judged that the plaintiff recover ; d of the defendant the sum of 3600.00 an: the cost of this action to be taxe by the Clerk, H, Hoyle Sink Judge Presiding Consent Sam Mayhew os Defendant ——- seaeneee ee 8 FF st This “onorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Aus™ 7th, 1951 at 9:30 o'clock, ww ee Mt air TT) BEG LDLNG IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- SUGUST TERM, 1951 Tusday, August 7th, 1951 WNo. 5056 | North Carolina IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Iredell County We H. Jennings Jury Sworn and Empanelled as follows: JB Earle A D Rogers, J W Horne, T O Hager, Fred EH ; A Fuller Sams, Jr, Noell S. Lents, Dan Kriders H V Lineberger, Henry R Bunch, Minor A Lentz,’ and R A Lowery. . Plaintiff Vs. eee D. A. Dockery Defendant lL. What amount of damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover i of the defendant? = Answer $158.00 - i rs . pac" 2 ities ee 7 soi pee: Bee aes) ga... ee ¥ ; ‘3 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i IREDELL COUNTY 3 W. H. Jennings Plaintiff i. JUDGMENT D. A. Dockery Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the August Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, a judgment by Default and Inquiry for the Plaintiff against the Defendant, having been given in the month of July , 1951 by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the jury having answered xim the issues submitted to them as follows: 1. What amount of Damages, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover of the Defendant? $158.00 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Answer Plaintiff have and recover of the Defendant the sum of One Hundfed Fifty- Eight dollars with interest thereon from the 7th day of May, 1951, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 7 day of August, 1951. ie Hoyle Sink — wo OK Kk ke a ok ok KK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Tuesday, August 7, 1981 flo. 5004 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court August Term 1951 Iredell County. “s 99 w, T. Fullbright, Plaintiff, vs. Maude Chapman Fullbright, ISSUES Defendant. 1. Did the plaintiff, W. T. Fullbright, and the defendant, Mawe Chapman Fullbright, internarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER _ Yes se 2. Have the Plaintiff, W. T. Fullbright, and the defendant, Maude Chapman. Fullbright, lived separate and apart from each other fi two consecutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes ‘ 3, Has the plaintiff, W. T. Fullbright, been a bona fide resident ¢ the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes ° NORTH C IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY? August Term 1951 W. T. Fullbright, | Plaintiff, : Vs. 4 JUDGMENT Maude Chapman Fullbright, | Defendant. l This cause coming on to be heard, and being heatd by His Honor He at the August term, 1951, Superior Hoyle Sink, J&dge Presiding, and a jury, Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues having been submitted to, and answered by the jury, to-wit: W. T. Fullbright, and the defendant, Maude : iff 1. Did the plaintill, alleged in the complaint? Chapman Fullbright, intermarry as ANSWER _Yes__. 2. Have the plaintiff, W. T. Fullbright, and the atentans ai Chapman Fullbright, lived separate and apart from es or years immediately prior to the commencement of this action’ ANSWER Yes ee ; t of 3. Has the plaintiff, W. T- Fullbright, been a = ite EE ae the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding ommen of this action? ANSWER Yes _ ‘s O01 * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Tuesday, August 7, 1951 The Court finds that the summons in this action was duly served on the defendant, Maude Chapman Fullbright, on the 26th day of January, 1951 by ? W. H. Rhyne, Deputy Sheriff of Alexander County, North Carolina, by leaving a copy of the summons, and a copy oi’ the complaint with the defendant, The Court further finds that the defendant filed an answer in this action on the 26th day of February, 1951, and that she was present and represented by her attorney, Mr. Ray Jennings of Taylorsville, North Carolina, during the trial of this action, and tht she was not at th~ time of the institution of this action, is not now, nor has she been since the institution of this action, in the military service of the United States of America. IT 1S, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, That the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are dissolved, and that the plaintiff, W. T. Fullbright, is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Maude Chapman Fullbright. Let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff. This the 7th day of August, 1951. EH. Hoyle Sink Judge Presiding. % % Me Ke oe mK mK KOK No. 5070 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term, 1951 Town of Mooresville j vs } ISSUE George Stevens Blackwelder | What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant on account of damage to the car? ANSWER: $450. and interest from Dec. 29, 1949. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Tuesday, August 7, 1951 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term, 1951 Town of Mooresville j : vs ! JUDGMENT ; George Stevens Blackwelder ! * This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor H. Hoyle Sink and a jury and being heard and it appearing that the summons and copy of the complaint were served on the defendant on June 7, 1951, that no answer was filed and that the complaint was duly verified and filed on May 29, 1951 and the jury having answered the issue as set out in the record. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $450.00 with interest from dec. 29, 1949 at the rate of six per cent and the cost of this acfion to be taxed by the Clerk. i bea sink a a ee ee No. 5115 NOR TH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CoURT IREDELL COUNTY. Charles Davis Mooney, By His Next Friend, W. Y. Davis, ! Plaintiff, j JUDGMENT Vs. ' TT W. Frank Redmond, Trading as — I Superior Ddries, and Carrol MeNeely, | Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard at the August Tern, 1951 of the H, Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, Iredell County Superior Court, before His Honor, parties without a jury; that the cause was and being heard by consent of the j itted to heard upon statements of counsel for both parties, and evidence subm to the Vourt the Court by a duly licensed physician, from which it appears is next friend that the minor, Charles Davis Mooney, twelve years of age, by h 9 SECOND WEEK --- AUGUST TERM, 1951 503 | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK --=- AUGUST TERM, 1951 Tuesday, August 7, 1951 truck belonging to the Defendant, W. Frank Redmond, were involved i na collision at the intersection of East Broad Street and Cowles Street in the City of Statesville, North Carolina, on January 23, 1950; and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed | upon the settlement of all matters and things growing out of the alleged injuries set forth in the Plaintiff's Complaint, by the terms of which the Defendant has agreed to pay the sum of Nixeteen Hundred Fifty Doliars | ' ot | ($1950.00) in full and complete settlement of the minor's alleged | injuries, together with the cost of this action. i@ A 4 , sarm4 : 1 oi nd the Court having carefully examined the evidence in the case ’ arti h i Pp i particularly the evidence of the physician, under whose care the minor was are entirely satisfied with the settlement, and that Dr. Dorest C. Meade of Davis Hospital, Statesville, North Carolina, who treated him, is of the opinion that the minor has made excellent recovery considering the extent and nature of his injuries; that after full inquiry into the matter, the Court enters the following decree: l. That the Plaintiff recover of the Defendants the sum of Nineteen Hundred Fifty Dollars (}1950.00), to be paid by the Defendant into the Office of theClerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina. Hospital, for the hospital and doctor's services, the sum of Two Hundred Thirty-seven Dollars ($237.00); to the minor's mother, Mrs. C. W. fooney, the sum of Two Hundred Seventy-two Dollars ($272.00), to reimburse her for expenses which she incurred in connection with the treatment d her son, the following items: for drugs, crutches and ambulance fees; Thirty-five Dollars ($35.00) asrequired by the hospital in the treatment of the child; and Twenty-three Dollars ($23.00) for laundry. 3. That the Defendant pay the cost of this action, to the Clerk of the Superior Court. 4. That the settlement between the parties, entered by consent, and approved by the Court, is not unreasonable or unjust to the minor Plaintiff, but is to his best interest. treated, and it was made to appear to the Court that the parents of the child 2. That out of the funds paid to him, the Clerk shall pay to Davis One Hundred Twenty-four Dollars ($124.00) for maid; Thirty Dollars ($30.00) damage to the child's bicycle; Sixty Dollars ($60.00) for milk and groceries be taxed by IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «-- AUCUST TERM, 1 Tuesday, August 7, 1951. - Signed and entered in Statesville, North Carolina, this ’ August 6, 1951. BY CONSENT: Mrs. C. We. Mooney... S.C. ¥. Mooney tia... Mr. Baxter H. Finch __ ttorneys C., H. Dearman or the Plaintiff Kttorneys for the Defendants io. 5015 Wo. 4995 5028 Mo, 5054 Wo, 5065 5072 WO. 5077 No. 5081 WO. 3527 me 3516 AWDW : State It appearing to the Court that the j = imposed of payment of fine and cos Lovette Roseboro Wo, 1213 State vs Reid Kenney Mittie L Clark Stanford Lowel Minda Dickens Joe I Mills vs W Ross Day & Geo H Smith Fred W Hudson vs Moor Food Store Inc. (Deacons) et al vs Olla (Luola) Cas with, it is ordere following entered. Judgment of in the common jail of { FOUR MONTHS to be assig of the State Highway ahd Admx of Samuel Fr { Lambreth #<----->- Woe es iiiiiaiidane - Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding Lucinda Bellamy vs Alfonzo Stevenson «--~~ the Court NON-COMPLIANCE Defendant called and failed It is ordered b Bond in sum of 200.00. J W Baity vs Richard (Junior) Campbell ------~~ Thomas G Shuler vs 2 L Shoemaker e----"--""" d that same be § Iredell Count ned to work under Public Works Commission. Moldply Corporation yg Home Made Geir Gay eneese=<----- —<—<——— = = ees ere -~--Continued ..-<Continued Continued Continued . weContinued .---Continued M D Tilley vs Mrs Josie Jordan e-<<-<---"%""""" t has not Continued .«Continued g -------Continued udgment heretofore been complied tricken out and the is that the defendant be confined y for a period of the supervision the Court that capias issue. i » See ae BAD TOME Marga ee Leb GE es Oe Mo. 5107 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK J. Chester Johnson, Next Friend : of Rollie Johnson vs. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY Transco rtinental Gas Pipe Line : sila Corporation and Ray C. Fish, ; NON SUIT R, le Ricketts, GC. B. Ames, J. Re Imber, O. L. Mullen A, J. L. Hutchinson, and hE. Bryan Trading and doing business under the nartnership name of Fish Constructors This cause coming to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C, C, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell county, and it appearing that Fish Constructors, Inc. is a necessary party Defendant in this action, and that the Plaintiff desires to bring a new action to include this defendant, now therefore, upon motion of Z. V. Turlington, Attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed tat a judgment of voluntary non suit be and is hereby entered in the above entitled action. This the 30th day of July, 1951. C. G. Smith .__... Clerk superior Court JNo. 4919 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Donald F, Lambert ( Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT ( Willie Mae Torrence Lambert Defendant ( This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to eted not to pursue his action at the Court that the plaintiff has ele ad to take 4 yoluntary nonsuit in this this time and has elected inste action; and decreed that the plaintiff It is, therefore, ordered, ad judged, Ath the costs to be charged by the be voluntarily nonsuited and be taxed Vv Clerk, This & day of August, 1951. C. G, Smith i lalitl ed Consented to: —tierk Superior Court. aii W. be W. JDe » she she whe ake: Weed pee Plalntifleaxasseeeeneeemeee ees: ) Ino. 5035 North Carolina In the Superior Court j } Tredell County Before the Clerk, ial Piedmont Bank & Trust Company : 4 Plaintiff, i i os. : Judgment of Voluntary Non Suit A. P. Steadman and C. A. Sykes, Defendants. eee ae eee. | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable | | C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it | | appearing to the court that the matters and things in controversy in the | above entitled action have been fully settled and agreed upon among the parties hereto. It is therefore ordered and adjudged and decreed that a judgment ¢ a ee Non Suit be and is hereby entered in the above entitled matter. August 7, 195l. C. G. Smith _ TLlerk of the Superior Court % eo \NO. 5078 NORTH CAROLINA Ix THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE TH! CLERK Statesville Industrial Bank, Inc. ( Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT H, V. Crews, Defendant. | : : _— n a ae fa) This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the facts set forth in the complaint filed in this cause are true and that the plaintiff has in its possession the automobile as set forth in said complaint, and that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief asked for and has met the requirenents of GS 1 - 121, and has served a copy of the sunsons and complaint on the defendant on the 6th day of July, 1951, and that no answer or other pleading has been filed by the defendant in this cause, and that the time for filing for answer or other pleading has expired, and thai the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final, 4 We Vl It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $252.54, with interest at the rate of i { 6 per annum from dune 1, 1951, until paid, and for the costs of this action. I It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said automobile ir iW the possession of the plajntiff be sold at public auction for cash and the I i proceeds of the said sale, after paying all expenses of the sale and of this | | ; action, that the remainder be applied to the payment of this judgment, and that i Neill S. Sowers be and he is appointed Comissioner by this Court for the bial ea purpose of selling the said automobile as described in the complaint and to Hi pay all of the costs as hereinbefore set out including reasonable com- ‘t Hh missioner's fee and taxes if any, and that the remainder be applied to the \ a monetary judgment heretofore retcined, and that the said Counissioner make 1h a report of the reecipts and disbursenents as required by law. 1 This the 9th day of August, 1951. ald a ee j A “Clerk Superior Court a | ew oe NO. 50%2 ! | y NORTH CAROLINA IN THS SUPERIOR COURT iS IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE TH. CLERK Be, Statesville Industria] Jank, Inc. (| Plaintiff, ) Vs. NON-SUIT Paul Hucks, Defendant ) ( . ie } ar h ~ cione This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, and it | appearing to the Court that the plaintiff never became in possession of the said personal property as described in this action, but that the : \ : s di é syille Industrial Bank before | defendant paid the indebtedness ave the Statesviil | ; Te ‘+, had had an opportunity to the Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, had ha Pk y take possession of the said automobile. + ’ } he Tt] rs S now And it further appearing to the Court that the controversy is as ea , h aintifl. settled and the defendant has paie his indebtedness to the pla i i decreed thé I aintiff ed. adiudre and decreed that the pla It is therefore, ordered, 4G juclec, Sih © ; : n be and it is hereby allowed to teke a nonsuit and it is hereby nonsuited i y al this action. This the 9th day of August, 1951. C, G, Smith Clerk Superior Court % O10 No. 5066 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY ROBERT LEE BURR, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, FANNIE VIRGINIA BURR PLAINTIFF IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SUPPLEMENTARY ORDER ELLEN FRANCES BLACK BURR ) ( ) ( -VS- ) DEFENDANT | It appearing to the court that the said child, Michael Dale Burr, was born to another. It is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the state registrar of the North Carolina Department of Health in Raleigh change the name of the father of the said child from Robert Lee Burr to Unknown on the original birth certificate and all other places that is kept a record including the record of the Rigister of Deeds of Cabarrus County and the child is hereby declared illegitimate. The aforesaid is in conpliance with Section 130-89 of the General Statutes of North Carolina. Done this the 28th day of May, 1951. F, Donald Phillips = F. Donald Phillips, residing Judge mw OM OK Oe Ke Oe mK mK me Oe OK mK mK Ke mK HK flo. 5099 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY Before the Clerk Swift & Company, Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT A, W. Couch, trading and doing business as Couch Grocery, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this l&th day of August, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: -l- That on July 11, 1951, the plaintiff filed a duly verified Comp}aint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. o2- That summons was issued from this Court on July 11, 1951, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. o3- That the summons was served on the defendant by Sam Laws, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on July 13, 1951, by leaving with the defendant a copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. a That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed,and no answer, demurrer, Other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. =5- ain That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum cert sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract in money due for merchandise . ized and agreement of the defendant to pay 4 certain sum therefor; that an one to, and made a part of the verified statement, marked "Exhibit A", was attached to, te of the Complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the da id therefor, and contained all debits and credits purchase, and the price to be pa arising out of the transaction. -6- duly verified complaint, and the itemized That the Court finds from the verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", 4 - Clerk of Superior Court of ~~ 3 Carl G. Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it Iredell County. , | i that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and q Clive i | ff Iho. 4,992 i of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A", the NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ih sum of Two Hundred Thirty-one Dollars Ninety-seven cents ($231.97), together 1 IREDELL COUNTY i e i} with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from July 28, 1959 4 Mrs. Willie G. Shoemaker JUDGMENT i F ; 5 by and through her next 1 if until paid. 4 friend, Buren Jurney ie IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the 3 Plaintiff i plaintiff recover of the defendant, A. W. Couch, the sum of Two Hundred Thirty- q Vs. | one Dollars Ninety-Seven Cents ($231.97), together with interest thereon a Douglas Campbell it at the rate of six per cent per annum from July 28, 1950, until paid. ; Defendant CH ig This the 16th day of August, 1951. 3 | ¢ This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable an C, G, Smith J i) ae | appearing to the Court from the statements of the attorneys for the plaintiff i HT | a and the defendant that the matters and things in controversy have been HW): d that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit 1k \NO. 4991 | settled between the parties and th Pp } 5 in its action; NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ee It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff IREDELL COUNTY JUDGMENT be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Vlerk. Mrs. Willie G. Shoemaker, by her next friend, Buren This 16 day of August, 1951. Jurney . Plaintiff a | Cierk of Superior Court | vs. . Mrs. Johnsie Campbell 7 Consented to: i Defendant Finch & Chamblee al | Kttorneys for Plaintiff This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable J. G. Lewis Kttorney for Defendant = Carl G, Smith, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appear ing to the Court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant that the matters and things in controversy have been settled ceeeedbeenenneeees tate Instanter 5 tes oe vs by order of Judge Hi Hoyle Sink, eee ricer. ef Odell Morrison, Jr. letter from Mr. 3. i Stokes, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plainti | (See letter in file be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by tie Clerk. This 16 day of August, 1951. Clerk of the Superior v0 e Consented to: Finch & Chamblee orneys for aintif?r Teens i ttorney for efendant eee eK Ke KK K io. 5110 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY PEOPLES LOAN AND SAVINGS BANK. VSe JUDGMENT VERNON MIZELL MOTOR CO. INC. J. He RICKERT AND C. C. MIZELL This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court, by default and for want of an answer, and it appearing to the court that the action is based on a note given by the defendants to the plaintit? J money loaned to to defendant Corporation and endorsed by the other defendants in the amount of $1750. with interest from May 7th, 1951, until paid, It xs further appears to the court that the action was comuenced on July 25th, 1951, and that the summons was served on all of the defendants on the 26th day of July, 1951 and that they have failed to answer the complaint or to otherwise plead in the cause. It is therefore aljudged that Plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $1750 with interest from May 7th, 1951 until paid, the defendants are taxed with the cost of this action. August 27th, 1951. C. G,. Smith a Clerk of the Superior Court Se Oe DSR He SEE OHS BE ono ES EN aes Yl0. 5102 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Robert J. Holshouser Plaintiff ) vs | JUDGMENT J. Neel Stewart and Helen J. Stewart Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court fiom the statement of the attorney for the plaintiff that the matters and things in controversey have been settled between the parties, that no property belonging to said plaintiffs has been attached and that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be nonstited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. This 5 day of Sept., 1951. ti i a, Clerk of the Superior Court ——— a a a x we mK x UiO. 5103 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY David Harrison, Pl. JUDGMENT vs. William A. Sloop, Def. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard befvre the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court for Iredell County, end it appearing to the Court that the parties in the above entitled action have settled by compromise all matters at issue and indispute jn said cause, by the plaintiff selling and conveying to the defendant all of his right, title and interest in and to the partnership assets, and the defendant paying to the plaintiff a d interest: certain consideration for sai d with the consent of the parties It is, therefore, by an and decreed that the pl dered that said cause be aintiff have and recover nothing ordered, adjudged, d dismissede from the defendant, and it iS OF This the 5 day of September, 1951. C. G. Smith erk of Superior Court ?o>— Iredell County. ounN a We consent to the above: David Harrison _ Plaint Grant Bolmer Attarney for Plaintiff = = William A. Sloop Defendant Henry E, Fisher a ttorney for Defendant — —_—_ /No. 5109 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. Alex George and Lee George, ! Partners, trading and doing business as a Partnership i under the firm name and style of Merchants Produce Grocery Co., | { Plaintiffs, Vs. ! FINAL JUDGMENT A, W. Couch, trading and doing ! business as Couch Grocery, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, NorthCarolina, on this 6th day of September, 1951, on motion of Adama, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: « Se That on July 24, 1951, the plaintiff filed a fuly verified Complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County: o2- That summons was issued from this Court on July 24, 1951, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. o3< that the summons was served on the defendant by W. C. Jenkins, Deputy 0 Sheriff of Iredell County, on July 24, 1951, by leaving with the defendant @ ¢ PY of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. oo That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, andthe time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant, ~5= That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiffs denands a sum in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreenent of the defendant to pay @ certain sum therefor; that an itemized verified staterent, marked "Exhibit A", was attached to, and made a part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and conteined all debits and credits arising out of the transaction. f -6e- That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint, and the itemized verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that the : ‘ i Ras an . ) 7 and ; ow f the defendant is now due the plaintiffs, on account of the sale and delivery 0 merchandise shown in the plaintiffs' statement, marked "Exhibit A", the sum of Three Hundred Seventeen Dollars ($317.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from Jenusry 8, 1951, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDIRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREHD that t su rs Hundred Seventeen plaintiffs recover of the defe ndant, A. W. Couch, the sum ot Three hu . + he > +a S » Th Dollars ($317.00), together with Interest thereon at th rate of six per cent per annum from January 6, 1951, until paid. This the 6th day of September, 1951. 6.6, ie... ' a ork of Superior Court of Iredell County. ee ees * * 517 erry SEP ECE IESE a a) (no, 5116 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Peaslee-Gaulbert Corporation VS. JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT H. E. Setzer This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant that the matters and things in controversy between the parties have been settled and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonmsuit in this matter; Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is hereby non-suited. This 10 day of Sept., 1951. eR eT ee Clerk of Supérior Court ple a Faas i ads STATE VS. B& E RALPH BARNETT NOAH BALL HENRY WEAVER GEORGE WEAVER Each defendant enters a plea of guilty. Judgment of the Court as to the defendants Noah Ball and Ralph Barnett on the charge of Breaking and Entering, is that each defendant be confined in the State's Prison for not less than four (4) nor more than five (5) years, to be assigned to hard labor as provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Judgment of the Court as to the defendant, Henry Weaver, S that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison at Raleigh for not less than eighteen (18) months nor more than two (2) years, and be assigned to the Youth's Division of said prison under the State lighway and Public Works Commission. Judgment of the Court as to the defendant, George seaver, on the charge of breaking and entering, is that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison in Raleigh for a period of not less than two (2) nor more than three (3) years and be assigned to the Youth's Division thereof, if complying with the requirements of such admission. It appearing to the Court that the defendant, George Weaver, sentenced at this, the September Term of the Superior Court of Rowan County, to a term of imprisonment in Case No. 118 on the Criminal Docket, has other and additional charges against him in the county of Iredell, which charges are Breaking and Entering, the defendant upon the advice of his counsel, Maj. W. 4. McElwee, waives bill of indictment and tenders to the Court a plea of nolo contendre to the said charges at this time alleged against him by warrant in the County of Iredell, and upon such plea and waiver of bill in open Court, the judgment of the Court is that all charges against said defendant in Iredell County be consolidated for judgment, and upon said plea the judgment of the Court is that the prisoner be confined in the State's Prison at Raleigh, N. C., for not less than to be assigned at hard labor under three (3) nor more than five (5) years, the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Capias and com.itment to issue at any time within two (2) years from this date, to-wit, the 12th 's violating any law of the State day of September, 1951, upon the defendant from of North Carolina, and particularly escaping or attempting to escape Court. the sentence in No. 118 in Rowan County at this term of the Go Upon the foregoing cases being called in the Superior Court of ng with the Solicitor of the District and counsel Rowan County, after conferri eae eT | i + i for the defendant, the officers of Iredell, Rowan, and Wilkes Counties, the Court elected, with the approval of said officers, to hear all 4 testimony offered relating to a series of robberies committed by the above-named defendants in the above-named counties, as well as Alexander, ‘ Yadkin, Davie and Watauga counties. The Court did not presume to in- corporate in punishment inflicted the crimes committed beyond the jurisdiction of the 15th Judicial District now being presided over by the undersigned Court. It did, however, consider all of the facts ’ offered in order that both the Court and the prosecuting officers should be fully advised as to the nature of the crimes committed. In so far as aes the crimes committed in the 15th Judicial District are concerned, the st a lanes ach a ad Court did assume authority for pronouncing judgment covering all the offences, and will not require or permit further trial or prosecution of these TE ees defendants in the 15th Judicial District relating to the crimes referred to in this testimony, the Court specifically limiting this to the crimes in this testimony. The Court further authorizes the defendants or their counsel to make such use of this official statement as they may deem proper. The Court directs that a copy of this official statement be certified by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Rowan County to the counties of Iredell and Alexander. This the 12th day of September, 1951. The High Sheriff of Rowan County, the High Sheriff of Iredell d County and the High Sheriff of Alexander County are hereby authorized and directed to deliver to and take such property as in their judgment has been identified by the respective losers in consequence of the breaking and i entering referred to in this record, at the expense of the owners and at 4 the convenience of the respective officers. a NORTH CAROLINA ROWAN COUNTY I, Paul A. Swicegood, Gerk Superior Court of Rowan County, North Carolina, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of the judgment remdered in the criminal case of "State v8. Ralph Barnett, Noah Ball, Henry Weaver, and George Weaver," by the Hon. H, Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding over the September Term, 1951, of the Kowan County Superior Court, as the same is taken from and compared with the e original on file in this office and recorded in Minute Docket No. 38, paé 71. VNO. 5131 Witness my hand and official, this 14th day of September, 1951. Paul 5S. Swicegood _—yT ‘ parry our nm w nt ROWAN COUNTY e 7 ee NORTH CAROLINA 0 a KERR EK HHH HR KK KKK EK KKK KR KE OR NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Statesville Industrial Bank, Inc. ) Plaintiff . | AM Ee Vs. ) JUDGMENT as \ j J. S. Vernon, ' WALES Defendant. ) i i by ( Mn 3 ) | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the en ee ae on stl 3 undersigned Clerk of Superior Court for Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the parties to this controversy have agreed and adjusted all matters and difficulties existing between them by the defendant execut- ing a renewal note with additional security for the amount as set forth in said Complaint, and it further appearing to the Court that the plajntiff is not in possession or has not been in possession of the personal property described in the said Complaint and in the ancilliary claim and delivery proceeding. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed upon the motion of land, Sowers and Avery, attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintif:- be allowed to take a nonsuit and it is hereby nonsuited . This the 17th day of September, 1951. C. G, Smith ici e superior vourt. neseesseseseneee?” Alo. 5135 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Sample-Winters Implement Company, A { Corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT J. S. Vernon, Defendant. | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the matters and things alleged in the Complaint have been completely settled between the parties hereto; that the Defendant has paid the Plaintiff the principal, interest and all costs an it was not necessary for the Sheriff to repossess the property of the Jefendant; that upon the complete settlement of the matter, the Plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREsD that the Plaintiff be, and he is hereby permitted to take a voluntary nonsuit; that the Defendant will be taxed with the cost which has, at the time of the signing of tais Judgment, been paid in full. Signed in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, on September 20, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. os p Ai stp OE a oe T Seaecs Se 3 oo a NE ei ae eae Ba Sates a , 5126 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT — BEFORE THE CLERK REDELL CO ° quth E. Smith, Plaintiff, go, 8uzt? Vs. Jonnie H. Madden, Administratrix if the Estate of Raymond Madden, ceased, and Donald Goforth, Defendants. This cause coming or to be heard and being heard before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the Plain- iff filed a summons and compleint in this action on August 20, 1951; that on Sept- wber 20, 1951, an order was signed extending the time for the Defendants to plead mtil October 10, 1951; that it further appearing that the Plaintiff now desires to tke a voluntary Non-suit, and to have the action dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff be and she is wreby permitted to make a voluntary Non-suit; that the cost of the action be taxed wainst the Plaintiff. Entered in Statesville, North Carolina on October 4, 1951. c. G. Smith Cr. Smith, clerk of superior Court of Iredell County. een eezaeeeaeaee aes? ‘ i Mg i \ ; og | i = i ‘2 + H » " i i R al A* “4 VRRG Al HE Psat BY ti Be on i 1 ie ou a ii Hi } HL : ait) at % RB “ i : td i Aa ad eu NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK A. L. Mills, Sr. Plaintiff JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUIT vs. Fred L. Overcash Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing that the matters and things involved in the foregoing cause have been settled satisfactorily to all parties concerned, and the plaintiff desires to have a judgmmt of voluntary nonsuit entered in this matter. Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff is allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this cause and the plaintiff is so nonsuited and is taxed for the costs of this action, This 6th day of October, 1951. C. G. Smith _ es Clerk Superior Court Consented to: Land, Sowers & Avery by WI Ward, Jr. ae at ttorneys for Plaintiff a a a a a ee ee Wo. 5105 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Charles F. Moose, T/A Moose Concrete Products Company, Plaintiff VS. JUDGMENT Woodrow Lutz, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor C, G, Smith, Clerk Superior Court of iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the court that tne defendant has been , roperly served with summons and a copy of tik complaint as provided for by law, and it further appearing to the court that this action on a stated account for an amount definite and that tne defendant has not filed answer or demurrer or otherwise plead within the time allowed by law. It is therefore ordered adjudged and decreed that the $351.00 with P le y AY .C « *) f° plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum o: interest from the 10th day of October, 1949 until paid, together with tie costs of this action to be taxed against the defendant. This the 17 day of October, 1951. C. G, Smith ~ - — Clerk Superior Court Ko. 5091 | NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT { IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK tf Statesville Industrial Bank, Inc iY, Plaintiff on. JUDGMENT Mrs. 3. L. Sparks, Defendant — en ne eee ee This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by his Honor C. G. Smith, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the court that the defendant has been properly served with summons and complaint in this action and it further appearing to the court that this is an action instituted for a sum certain and for claim and delivery as an ancilliary remedy. And it further appearing to the court that the plaintiff has never had possession of the personal property sought in the claim and delivery proceeding. And it further appearing to tie Court that the defendant has paid off and satisfied the indebtedness due the plaintiff and that the plaintiff has no further claim of action against the defendant in this matter and that the plaintiff has asked to be allowed to take a nonsuite Therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be and is allowed to take a nonsuit and is hereby nonsuited in this action, This the 17 day of October, 1951. C, G, Smith Clerk Superior Uourt ———— ee nok Om Ok ok Oe oc ke OO RAR ag Ah VASE in eee Le, BESS ESS os cece een WO. 5127 NORTH CAROLINA IN TH SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Carolina Motor Company vs. : JUDGMENT L. P. Sprinkle and Jay L. Ellis This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell Vounty on this the 20th day of October, 1951, on motion of Scott & Vollier, Attorneys, for judgment by default final. It appearing to the Court that the action was instituted in this Court on August 21, 1951, to recover upon a note secured by a chatvel mortgage; That the sheriff of lredell vounty served a writ of attachment, together with summons, on the defendant on August 23, 1951, and the defendant gave a replevy bond with Jay L. Ellis as surety in the amount of Nine Hundred ($900.00) Dollars to assure the delivery of the automobile describe in the Complaint to the Rie} Court. | It further appears to the Court that in the action based on the note, which is secured by chattel mortgage, there is due on said note the sum of One Hundred Thirty-Six and 60/100 ($136.60) Yollars, with interest at 6% from May 19, 1951; that complaint was served on the defendant on the 19th day of September, 1951, and he has failed to 5 answer or to otherwise pleai in the cause; and it further appears to the Court that tne plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against the defendant and his surety, and that the said judginmt be declared a specific lien against the property. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged ani decreed that the plainvstt recover of the defendant, L. P. Sprinkle, and the surety, Jay lL. Bilis, the sum of One Hundred Thirty=-5ix and 60/100 (*136.60) Dollars, with interest from May 19th, 1951, at the rate of 6% until paid; and that the said judgment is declared a specific lien upon the 1942 model Ford Coupe, Motor No, 18-6834904, and that execution shall be directed by this Court to the end that the Sheriff seize said car and sell the same he in satisfaction of the judgment, and failing therein he may satisfy t Said judgment by the property of the defendant and his surety. G, G, Smith ____. Clerk Superior Vourt. ge2e40 0 09055 Pe ee ee ace No, 4201 North Carolina. In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Moody M. Rash vs JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Jd E Johnson The plaintiff, through covnsel, moves the Court for voluntary nonesuit. It is, therefore, ordered and cecreced that the action be at the cost of the plaintiff. October 24th, 1951. UC. G, Smith. i Clerk Superior Court No. 4989 North Carolina In the Superior Court , Iredell County Before the Clerk. J. B. Cooper Motor Company vs JUDGMENT OF NON-SULT E. L. Shoemaker The plaintiff, throvgh counsel, moves the Court for a voluntary non-suit. It is, therefore, ordered and decreed that the action at the cost cr the plaintiff. This Cetober 2kth, 1951. C, G, Smith _. erk Superior Court wom ee ke me ok ae ak em aa ay SE poe nes 29 Bei vere si es a tet remem 2) No. 5055 North Carolina | Iredell County | Peoples Loan and Savings Penk ee This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this case was served on the defendant, Thomas b. Drum, on July 2nd, 1951, together with a copy ofthe verified complaint; that the action is for the recovery of money loaned to Robert L. Drum ahd Thomas B, Drum, represented by a note; that there is due the plaintiff the sum of 3370.87, with interest from Nov. 24, 1950, until paid. It further appears to the Court that the defendant has failed to answer and the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final, It is, therefore, ordered and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $370.87, with interest from Nov. 24, 1950, until paid and that he be taxed with the costs of this action. This October 24th, 1951. a Clerk Superior Vourt a ee { , ) Bt ia a No. 5080 North Carolina | In the Superior Court, Iredell County | Before the Clerk, Statesville Gin Company { vs JUDGMENT Ivey L. Ellis | This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court and it appearing to the Court that summons and complaint were served on the defendant on the 23rd day of June, 1951, and that the action is based on an account stated in the amount of $312.67, with interest from January 1, 1950, and that the defendant has failed to answer the complaint in this cause; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed tiiat the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $312.67 with interest from January 1, 1950, until paid, and that he be taxed with the costs of this action. This October 24th, 1951. i i Clerk Superior Court wow wR ek eR ek ee OK Kk me ee t \ B % e ate peg OS, led Paes SRR are ah ae ea et Fe sass Site: eae oe flo. 5147 North Carolina | In the Superior Court, Iredell County | Before the Ulerk. Auto Parts and Electric Company | V6 JUDGMENT E. T. Warren | It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have adjusted and settled the matters of difference between them and that the automobile has been returned to the defendant; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the action be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff. This October 24th, 1951. A erk Superior Court ReeR KK RRR KK KO eR RR RM fio. 4682 j r Court North Carolina. | In the Superio Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. Hutton and Bourbonnais Company JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT R. L. Shoemaker vs | The plaintiff, through counsel, moves the Court for a voluntary non-suit. It is, therefore, ordered and decreed that the action be . > dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff. This October 25th, 1951. CC. G, Smit h dali Clerk Superior Court ne ene ee eH a ee No. 4,900 IREDELL COUNTY M & J Finance Corporation Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Willis Rhodes en So eee er Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable U. G, Smith, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing that the matters and things involved in the foregoing cause have been settled satisfactorily to all parties concerned and the plaintiff desires to have a judsment of voluntary nonsuit enteres in this matter. Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that tr. plaintiff is allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this cause, and the plaintiff is so nonsuited and is taxed for the cost of this action. This 25 day of Uctober, 1951. v, G, Smith vy i ileal “Clerk Superior Court Consented to: W. I. Ward, Jr Attorneys for Plaintiff Mo, 5112 NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Vourt Before the Clerk Rk, G,. Watts and L. G. White, Partners, trading amd doing pusiness under the partnership name and of Watts & White Macninery Company, Plaintiffs, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT N, F. (Newberry *.) Hall, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell Vounty, North varolina, Ar on this 31st dé _ of Octol er, ay ot, OF wotion of adams , Jesrman and \int erry, Attorneys fo1 the plaintiffs, for judement by default fay i } a appearing to the bourt: That on the 27th day of July, 1951, the aintiffs filed a 7 . 7 =F , , s si diel aaa ls duly verified complaint in the above untitled action, with the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County. iifie ' yal i i a That summons was issued from this Vourt on tar 27th day of i f i County d was wnable as provided 1951, to the Sheriff of Rowan County, and was return p the cefendant by_Jd. KR. White, ere ’ - 7 ———_—-= That the summons was servee OF he 2 lay of July y leaving with the Deputy Sheriff of Rowan County, on tue 2eth day of July, 1951, by l f i rons wether with a copy of the complaint. ndant a copy of the sunpons, together with é py -Le- defendant to answer was ho! Thet the time for t.« xi oni. ne w elapsed, md no answer time allowed by law for the defendant to answer tide now ela} ’ < , . ; ‘sed r the defendant demu rre ?, other pleading or motion nas be: rn 1134e€G0 by I . -5- , ihn tis complaint 32+e¢ by nc ¢ the plaintiffs demancs a sum That the verified : : ’ maa mndaer old and delivered to the defendant under certain in money due for merchandise é } r . no : pay a in sum thereior; that the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay © certa wit ac y 2¢ > ~ - , », and made & "Exhibit A", was attached to, and an itemized verified statement, marked set forth the merchandise purchased, part of the complaint, which statement a and contained the date of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, 4 P saction. all debits end credits arising out of the tram obo duly verified complaint, and te " and marked "Exhibit A", That the Court finds from the “ itemized verified statement attached t due the plaintiffs, o the complaint, on account of the sale ad that the defendant is now delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiffs! state : | ini p tatement, marked sum of Two Hundred Sight Dollars Ten Cents (3208.10) ’ together with interest thereon at the per annun from August 1, 1949, until paid. 37 ic ran em. + sat a Vita that the plaintiff i Tie ee Clerk of Superior Court of ~ jredell Vounty. 4#4,550 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY M. B. Steinberger, T/a Statesville Salvage & Furniture Company Vs. Mrs. Sara Carson THIS CAUSE coming on to ve heard and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it being made to appear to the court that the defendant has never been served with process in this action and the court so finding this as a fact. It is therefore ordered adjudged and decreed on the motion of Land Sowers and Avery, attorneys for the plaintiff, that this action be dismissed. This the 31 day of October, 1951. C. G. Smith = Clerk Superior Court tees EERE RARHRHR ES 3 Koo1 yORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ont Lumber & Mfg. Co., Inc. _ Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. ¢, C. Wallace, Re A. Wallace and Ce A. Wallace Defendants THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard by His Honor C. G. §nith, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appear- ing to the court that the defendants C. C. Wallace and KR. A. allace have been properly served with summons and that no answer or other pleading has been filed by the said defendants within the time allowed by law, and it further appearing to the court that this is an action on two promissory notes under seal oy the defendants or principals; and it further appearing to the court that this is an action for a sum definite and is an action which a judgment by default final can oe given. It is therefore upon the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendants C. C. Wallace and Re A. Wallace the sum of $29.00 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from June 21, 1948, until paid, and for the sum of $300.00 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from Septemoer 15, 1948, until paid, and for the cost of this action to be taxed oy the Clerk. This the lst day of Novemoer, 1951. C. Ge Smith Clerk superior Court Yo.5025 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT No RTH CAROLINA BEFORE THE CLERK IREDELL COUNTY Dalice Harmon Williams Plaintiff Vs. 4, Raymond Williams Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- Signed Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appear- ing to the court that the parties to this action have already obtained a divorce. fhe husband having brought an action for divorce at approximately the Same time and having already been granted a divorce. All of this appears of record of this court and that the plaintiff in this action now comes into the court and asks that she be allowed to take a nonsuit on her action, It is therefore ordered adjudged and decreed upon the motion of Land Sowers & Avery that the plaintiff be and she is hereby allowed to take a nonsuit and she is hereby nonsuited. This the 41 day of October, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk Superfor Court tet SCHR He EH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK, --- NOVEMBER TERM Monday, November 5th, 1951° — NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. C. on the 5th day of November, 1951, at 10:00 O'clock A, M., when and where His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, Fall Term, 1951, is present and presiding, and Honorable Zeb A. Morris, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. J.C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell vounty is present and opened Vourt by order of the vourt. J. C. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell vounty returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the November Tera, 1951 Iredell County Superior Vourt, for the first week, to-wit: I, Johnson J. I. Lutz, Jr J. D. McCrary T. F. Gudger Watt Jas. J. Nabors J. C. Walker Lawrence Monroe Reid Clontz Roy L. Redman Gilmer S. Morrison W. J. McDade GO. D. Welborn J. S. Dobson Lazenby J. T. Hobbs Robert Warren P. H. Hicks Miss Margaret Patterson A. E. Gray R. B. Wood A. E. Myers W. Houston Westmoreland Paul E. Hoke Charles Mack C. Rex Adams Cc, F, Patterson Mrs, Etta Lowery ~ J. B. Carson, J. M. Hager G. F. Clontz and J. T. Hobbs were excused by Dr's Certificate. J. B. Garson and J. I, Lutz, Jr were not returned. Robert Warren was exaused by the court until Monday, Nov. 12, 1951. T, F. Gudger was out of the County. L. &, Merritt was summonsed and sworn as 4 talesman juror. No. 1103 FALSE PRETENSE State Alias Capias vs Guy Ramsey fo. 1312 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON State Continued under former order. vs Charles BE. McLelland Mo. 1345 POSSESS LIQUOR State Alias Capias vs Mary Saunders a a cael et a ATT I SB aR An SE i i oe Ss as Rie oS a cing i igs i ios ara i 7 a eS SS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WESK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Monday, November 5th, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --~- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Monday, November 5th, 1951 Mo. 1449 POSSESS LIQUOR State It is ordered by the court that capias and comnitment issue for the defendant on the 19th day of November, 1951 at 12300 o'clock Noon, to begin service of 6 months on the roads. No. 1354 State j vs | Benjamin Jackson Threatte, Jr ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order, vs James (Pete) Shoemaker A 5 a NE Se A AG nt AP 2 CRE No. 1360 FORGERY State Nol Pros With Leave. Yo. 1552 SPEEDING vs a. State Defendant called and failed. Sei Fa and Instanter Vapias. spn A em vs Charles Edward Myers te = FORGERY State \ 4 Nol Pros With Leave, 4 Mo. 1555 HIT & RUN vs a ‘4 State _ Defendant called and failed. Nisi vs Sei Fa and Instanter Capias. John Lee Johnson CSF age Ee FRI ME e oo ‘No. 1362 FORGERY | State Nol Pros With Leave. . No. 1556 i ‘a State Ervin Feimster + “— , Jonn Lee Johnson WO OPERATOR'S LICENSE Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Instanter Capias. i No . 1363 FORGERY state Nol Pros With Leave. of flo. 1589 oe 4 State Ervin Feimster 4 vs Hugh Bryant Wallace PASSING ON CREST OF HILL Defendant called and failed. Judgment Sei Fa and Instanter Capias. ¥* 136% FORGERY : “ane Nol Pros With Leave. Ra Aio. 1590 rvin reimster & vS ‘ Hugh Bryant Wallace RECKLESS DRIVING Defendant called and failed, Judgnent Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. DRIVING DRUNK \No. 1387 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Aio. 1600 Continued for the State. State Continued under former order State vs Johnnie Meten vs Emmett George Eisele No. 1509 State Vs Toby Hyde No. 1519 State vs Luther "Luke”™ Kimmer Wo. 1520 State vs | Will Mathis, alias Will Mathews Wo, 1549 State vs William Leroy Smith \No. 1572 | State | vs j Bud Little alias Marshall 7 LARCENY Alias Capias BREAKING, ENTSRING & LARCENY Continued BREAKING, ENTSRING & LARCENY Continued ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias BREAKING & ENTERING Alias Capias Mo. 1501 & 1502 State vs Lonzo Smith Alo, 1550 & 1551 State vs Carl Asbury Brown flo, 1595 State vs Marvin Ladd Kio . 1609 State vs William Campbell C=21 SCI FA ON BOND It is ordered that the judgment be made absolute on the bond to be dischrged on payment of $50.00 and the cost. SUI FA ON BOND It is ordered by the court that execution issue on said Surety within ten days from the rising of this court. Bondsmen to be discharged on payment $250. and Cost ASSAULT ON FEMALE Defendant enters 4 plea of nolo contendere, the © 3s ti fendant The judgment of the Court is that the defen be seatines in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of two years and be assigned to work on the roads as provided by law under the State Highway W Comm ion. apy Pues ES Por getgen ) ESCAPING FROM JAIL ters a plea of Guilty. ae ot Court i that the defendant be Judgment of th he common jail of Iredell County Fined 19d of TWENTY MONTHS and be assigned the roads as provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works Commission. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Monday, November 5th, 1951 No. 1608 ESCAPING FROM JAIL State efendant enters a plea of vs The judgment of the Senn is “nr Carl Asbury Brown defendant be confined in the common jai) C-26 of Iredell County for a period of TWENTY MONTHS and be assigned to work on the roads as provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works Commission, Nos. 1550 & 1551 State vs Jury Sworn and empanelled and returned a Carl Asbury Brown SPEEDING: TRANSPORT & POSSESS NON-TAX Pp possessing non-tax paid liquor. On the charge of transporting non-tax paid liquor, judgment of the court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS and be assigned to work on the roads ag provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works Commission, On the charge of speeding and the charge of possession of non-tax ne liquor, prayer for judgment is continued for a period of THREE YEARS from this date, to-wit, the 5th day of November, 1951, upon condition the defendant violate no law of the State of N. C, and that he not escape nor attempt to escape from the sentences imposes as of this date. WorTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPMRIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 State vs Carl Asbury Brown It appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact that \, a certain automobile, being a Ford sedan, Motor No. 99A754244, License No. 695 672, was registered in the name of Mason Belton, 1409 15th Street, Winston-Salem, N. C. when apprehended by the officers of the law, James Tomlin and Ralph Marshall, in the hands of Carl Asbury Brown, of 1612 North Cherry Street, Winston-Salem, N. C,, at approximately 2:30 A, M, the 3rd day of Jume, 1951, on Highway 901, and that at the tine the said automobile had therein two and a half cases of non-tax-paid 1iqur, and in the trunk thereof three additional cases of the same commodity: Upon the foregoing facts the Court orders that the said automobile be confiscated as provided by law, and that in the event the said Mason Belton or any other person shall make claim therefor, that such claim shall be denied by the High Sheriff of Iredell County until such time as such claimant may establish his right in law to said automobile by a showing of innocence or relationship to the transportation of said white liquor, and only upon those circumstances This the 5th day of November, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink udge res ng verdict of guilty of speeding, transporting and Defendant enters a plea of Not Gallen LIQUOR, Se [BS LS iy gi, nate ae hia Soe te as a aa FARRER SRR ni aes ee Analipie ee ee era IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK +-- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 NO. 1599 State vs George E. Creson We26 Alo. 1552 State vs Charles Edward Myers We21 flo. 1394 State vs Frank N. Moore W-28 Alo. 1618 State vs James W, Baker Alo. 1619 State vs games Baker No. 1641 & 1642 State vs Weldon Campbell Willard Chambers flo. 1610 State vs Earl Southern, Jr ee ee RE NG Pe Pe NS ES SY SE Se ES Sm SET a SS SL De Pe Monday, November 5th, 1951 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the deferdant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWO YEARS to be assigned to work on the roads as provided by law under the State Highway and Public \orks Commission, Capias and commitment to issue for the enforcement of this sentence at any time within three years from this date, to-wit, the 5th day of November, 1951, provided the defendant shall wilfully fail to pay to his wife for her use and the use of his three children begotten upon her body within the course of three years of marriage, the sum of $17,50 on or before 12:00 o'clock, noon, of each Saturday, the payments to begin on the coming Saturday from this date, or upon his violating any law of the State of North Carolina. That he pay the cost of this action within 90 days from this date. SPEEDING Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of Guilty as charged in warrent. The judgment of the court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR MONTHS to be assigned to work on the roads as provided by law underthe State Highway and Public Works Commission, 42 Veterans Court, Statesville, N. C. Hair- Red; Race-White; 165 lbs.; 5'8"; Eyes-Green; Dr. Lic. 1243438. DRIVING DRUNK Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a fine of $250.00 and pay the cost of this action. It is further ordered by the Court that the defendant not operate a motor vehicle for a riod of TWELVE MONTHS. . Rt. l, Statesville, N. ¢. Lic. #7749. 170 lbs. 5'7", Grey eyes, Brn, Hair. FORGERY A True Bill FORGERY A True Bill DESTROY PERSONAL PROPERTY A true Bill LARCENY A True Bill IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK ---- NOVEMBER ei 1951 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 541 Monday, November 5th, 19 FIRST WEEK «-- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Monday, November 5th, 1951 defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWENTY-FOUR [UNTHS and be assigned to work on the roads as provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works Commission. On the charge of speeding and the charge of possession of non-tax paid liquor, prayer for judgment is continued for a period of {| THREE YEARS from this date, to-wit, the 5th | day of November, 1951, upon condition the A Mio. 1552 the sum of $17,50 on or before 12:00 o'clock, noon, of each Saturday, the payments to begin on the coming Saturday from this date, or upon his violating any law of the State of North Carolina. That he pay the cost of this action IM within 90 days from this date. Ni Ao. 1608 | ESCAPING FROM JAIL State Defendant enters a plea of Gui] a ’ ty. a vs { The judgment of the Court is that th NO. 1599 } ABANDON & NON-SU | e ° -SUPPORT \ Carl Asbury Brown j es bes in = commen jail 4 State | ? Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. + - r a period of TWEN vs udgment of the Court is that the deferdant | MONTHS and be assigned to work on the ” : George E. Creson | be confined in the common jail of Iredell. aoa nay ee by — under the State 4 We26 County for a period of TWO YEARS to be ghway and Pu e Works Commission, ‘ assigned to work on the roads as provided | by law under the State Highway and Public Works his vik & tut ; | Commission. gee aaa ice peer wear POSSESS NOW~ Pax PAID Liquogil — and commitment to issue for the plea of Not Guilty, enforcement of this sentence at any time within vs ot oo empanelled and retarded « | three years from this date, to-wit, the 5th day | Carl Asbury Brown veneeenben one ain gaat ties transporting ang 7 } of November, 1951, provided the defendant shall : oe ° eg y 3 i | | Ss Gia datwes 4f Grinds arsine aan ie ¢ wilfully fail to pay to his wife for her use and ‘ieee. Seas af ts Gout 4 paid | the use of his three children begotten upon her , ourt is that the , body within the course of three years of marriage, ! { | I | Ree. SN eS pier % Pie ORS owes SPEEDING defendant vielate no law of the Stateat e State Defendant enters a plea of Not Guilty. Hi ‘ N. C, and that he not escape nor attempt to : vs Jury sworn and empanelled and retumed a verdict WAS escape from the sentences imposes as of this ‘i ; M of Guilty as charged in warrent. AR date. P % — eee ayers The judgment of the court is that the defendant EA be confined in the common jail of Iredell County Ny a for a period of FOUR MONTHS to be assigned to | work on the roads as provided by law underthe Hl State Highway and Public Works Commission. ! Wort CAROLINA, IN THE SUPRIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 5 : _ 42 Veterans Court, Statesville, N. C. } . Hair- Red; Race-White; 165 lbs.; 5'8": Eyes-Green; a ||) Dr. Lic. 1243438. 4 State vs ORDER Carl Asbury Brown a ES EE ES a ee It appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact that \ a certain automobile, being a Ford sedan, Motor No. 99A7542h4, License No. 695 672, was registered in the name of Mason Belton, 1409 15th Street, Winston-Salem, N. C. when apprehended by the officers of the law, James Tomlin and Ralph Marshall, in the hands of Carl Asbury Brown, of 1612 North Cherry Street, Winston-Salem, N. C,, at approximately 2:30 A. M, the 3rd day of Jume, 1951, on Highway 901, and that at the time the said automobile had therein two and a half cases of non-tax-paid liquor, and in the trunk thereof three additional cases of the same commodity: Upon the foregoing facts the Court orders that the said automobile be confiscated as provided by law, and that in the event the said Mason Belton or any other person shall make claim therefor, that such claim shall be denied by the High Sheriff of Iredell County until such time as such claimant may establish his right in law to said automobile by a showing of innocence or relationship to the transportation of said white liquor, and only upon those circumstances. This the 5th day of November, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink —yhige Prestding fio. 1394 State vs Frank N, Moore W-28 4Nio. 1618 State vs James W, Baker Mo. 1619 State vs games Baker Kio, 1641 & 1642 State vs Weldon Campbell Willard Chambers flo. 1610 State vs Earl Southern, Jr eee mm DRIVING DRUNK Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a fine of $250.00 and pay the cost of this action. It is further ordered by the Court that the defendant not operate a motor vehicle for a j4od of TWELVE MONTHS. OY ie. l, Statesville, N. GC. Lic. #7749. 170 lbs. 5'7", Grey eyes, Brn, Hair. FORGERY A True Bill FORGERY A True Bill DESTROY PERSONAL PROPERTY A true Bill LARCENY A True Bill Wo. 1614 & 1615 State vs Bidful Privette Frank Privette Alo. 1620 State vs Ervin Edgar Young alias Moone hio. 1623 State vs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Monday, November 5th, 1951 |} BREAKING , ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill | BREAKING, ENTERING & ASSAULT ON FEMALE | A True Bill y | BREAKING & ENTERING i A True Bill John Thomas alias John Thomas Corry No. 1597 State vs Durand Feimster \No. 1598 State vs Durand Feimster No. 1612 State vs Bidful Privette Wo. 1611 & 1613 State vs Bill Harris Bidful Privette Wo. 1616 State vs J. D. Gray Wo. 1621, State vs Woodrow Chambers \No, 1622 State vs Daniel Miller ‘No. 1621 State vs Neil Devon Miller Wo. 1236 State vs Colene H. O'Neil ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A True Bill LARC:NY A TRUE BILL BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON A T rue Bill BREAKING & ENTERING A True Bill 1 AID & ABETT IN BREAKING & ENTERING & LARCEN A True Bill BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY A True Bill BREAKING, ENTERING, LARCENY & RECEIVING Instanter Capias IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Monday, November 5th, 1951 Mos. 1558, 1559, 1560 1561, 1562, 1563, 1564 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568 & 1569 State vs Lottie Bell Cloud Lillie Cloud Alice Cloud Louise McCree | | | | | fio, 1548 State vs Talmadge Walter Combs flo. 1512 State vs Clarence Lowell Lytle, Jr vt This Honorable Court taxes 1951 at 9:30 o'clock, A. M. LARCENY The defendants, Lillie Cloud, Alice Cloud and Louise McCree, enter pleas of Nolo Contendere. The defendant, Lottie Bell Cloud, pleads Not Guilty, whereupon the following jury was sworn and empanelled: WI Johnson, H W Watt, D H Lazenby Miss Margaret Pattersor, W houston Westmoreland, Charles Mack, James J Nabors, Roy L Redman, A E Gray, Paul E Hoke, C Rex Adams & J M Hager. The jury returned a verdict of Guilty as cherged in the Bill of Indictment. In Nos. 1560, 1563, 1566, 1569, as to the four defendants, the plea of nolo contendere is ree out and the Court directs a verdict of ot Guilty. Nos. 1558, 1561,1564 and 1567 are consolidated for judgment. The Judgment of the Court is, on the charge of larceny, that the defendants and each of a other tian Lottie Bell Cloud pay a fine of $250. and be confined in the Women's Division of the State's Prison at Raleigh, \. C., for not less than ONE YEAR nor more than EIGHTEEN MONTHS and be assigned to such labor as is provided for women prisoners therein. Capias and com itment to issue for the enforcement of the prison sentence at any tiie within three years from this date, to-wit, the 6th day of November, 1951, upon the defendantg violating any law of the State of N,. C, As to Lottie Bell Cloud, er ne ae ae that the defendant pay a fine of $250.00 and pay the cost of this action at this term of court and be confined in the \omen's Division of the State's Prison at Raleigh, \.&., for not less than ONE YEAR nor more than EIGHTEEN MONTHS and be assigned to such labor as is provided for women prisoners therein. Capias and commitment to -ssue for the enforcement of the prison sentence at any time within three years from this date, to-wit, the 6th day of November, 1951, upon the defendant violating any law of the State of N. ©, In 1568 as to Louise MeCree, prayer for judgmet is continued for THREE YEARS upon condition the e of good behavior. teen tpe2 and 1559, as to Lillie Cloud ad Lottie Bell Cloud, prayer for judgment is continued for THREE YEARS upon condition the defendant be of havior. ris ke ordered that the clothes be returned to the rightful owners. AID & ABETT IN SPEEDING Nol Pros With Leave. Y MT ceniaring to the Court that the defendant ime under the age of 16 years at the time the cr das committed, it is ordered that this action be remanded to the Juvenile Court for final dispostition. a recess until Tuesday Morning, November 6th, v0 1610 State vs Earl Southern , Jr . W-16 Wo. 1639 State vs lelvin Lackey W-20 ‘No. 1624 State vs Woodrow Chambers C-31 Wo. 1621 & 1622 State vs Ned Devon Miller, W-16 Daniel Miller, W-17 IN THE SUPERIOR. COURT FIRST WEEK --= NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 6th, 19$1 | Tuesday korning, November 6th, ) This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment es 1951. LARCENY Defendant through his attorney } M, Simons, enters a plea of ele Sottatee The judgment of the Court is that the ‘ei defendant be confined in the comnon jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTEEN ; MONTHS to be assigned to work on the roads as provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works Commision, and pay the cost of this action. Capias and Commitment to issue forthe enforcement of the prison sentence at any time within two years from this date, to-wit the 6th day of November, 1951, upon condition the defendant violate any law of the State of North Carolina or any rules ad regulations of the Probation official to whose custody he is assigned, with instructions to work out a plan by which he may be supervised by the Virginia authorities. Defendant is placed on probation under regular rules of probation officer; Special condition that the defendant be returned to Pulaskie in the State of Va. under the reciprocal probation rule. NON-SUPPORT & ABANDONMENT Defendant enters plea of Cuilty. Prayer for judgment is continued for a period of THREE YEARS from this date, to-wit the 6th day of November, 1951, upon the payment of the cost of this case and upon the further condition that he support and maintain the child named in the warrant at the home of his parents in “ooresville, N. C., or wherever they may reside, pro- vided he shall at no time remove the child from the State of N. CU, BREAKING & ENTERING Defendant enters a plea of Guilty. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jai} of Iredell County for a period of FOUR MONTHS to be assigned to work on the roads as provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works Commission. BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY The defendants through their attr John R. McLaughlin, enters a plea of Mo Contendere. As to each defendant, upon the oF abe of breaking and entering, the judgme confined Court is that the defendants each be ~ in the State's Prison at Raleigh for MY less than TWO nor more than THREE Y Pr ‘a be assigned to Junior Prison Camp ° er the the State Prison Camp of N. ry wera State Highway and Public Works a : and pay the cost of this action at ; term of the court. Capias and comm eo to issue for the enforcement of ot sentence at any time within two ye of from this date, to-wit, the 6th day otendatt November, 1951, upon condition a violate any rule or regulagion of a Pobation authorities of N. %, Se spaeile custody they are placed, it being suthoratie? cally directed that the probation sei’ supervise him and check upon his to prowl around at night. . Mo. 1616 State vs J. D. Gray CH29 No. 1637 State vs William Larry Charles We flo. 1601 State vs Calvin Jones Pearson - ~~ dio, 1634 State vs Faxton Loftis We 29 Mio, 1635 State vs Hilam Loftis We-25 IN THE SUPERIOR couRT FIRST WEEK --~ NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 6th, 1951 ~ see ee ee ee pc RE Oe pe Re pee Ee Cee ey er ee ee ee mn ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TEN MONTHS to be assigned to work on the roads as provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Capias and commitment to issue at any time within two years from this date, to-wit November 6th, 1951 upon condition defendant faile to ii pay the cost of this action on or before 12:00 if o'clock Noon, Monday, November 12, 1951, and | that he pay@l0.00 per month, beginning on the lst day of December, until hospital bill of his Step-Father have been paid in full and that he not violate any law of the State of N. C, ASSAULT j | Defendant through his attorney, William Neel, | a enters plea of Nolo Contendere. “he Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a fine of $25.00 and pay the cost of this action. DRIVING DRUNK Wis Defendant through his attorney, J. G. Lewis, ih Ee enters plea of Nolo Contendere. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant q i be confined in the common jail of Iredell County i\ for a period of FOUR MONTHS to be assigned to i lit such labor as he may be found physically able Hy to perform, if any, after medical examination, ‘e under the State Highway and Public Works Com- mission, as is provided by law; the Clerk directing that the medical certificate presented in court be attached to his commitment. That the defendant pay the cost of this action. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL Defendant through his attorney, Mr. Rice, waives Bill of Indictment and enters plea of Nolo Contendere of Assault With Deadly Weapon. After hearing the evidence the Court strikes out the plea on the felony charge. The defendant through his attorney enters a plea of Guilty of Assault With Deadly weapon. Prayer For fod gnent is continued for a period of Two years from this date, to-wit, the 6th ; day of November, 1951, upon the defendant paying a fine of $50.00 and the cost. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL endant through his attorney, Mr. Rice, waives Def Bad Qh erBOSF RSBH ULE wHPhS Sakt$ wh pbRt° After hearing the evidence the Vourt strikes out the plea on the felony charge. The defendant through his ee a plea of Guilty of With Dead leapon. eae for Gadgnent is continued for a period of Two Years from this date, to-wit, the 6th day of November, 1951, upon the defendant paying a fine of $50.00 and the Cost. The Two bills in 1634 and 1635 are consolidated for cost. ten COat be tse: «ide IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TiiM, 1951 Tuesday, November 6th, 1951 Nos. 1632 & 1633 State vs | Homer A. Nantz | lL'e ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT: ASSAULT ON A FEMALE was” two cases are consolidated for Defendant through his att R. McLaughlin, mative a lee of Mk tan Jury Sworn and empanetied. ‘Y. During the trial the defendant his plea of Not Guilty and enters of Nolo Contendere. The two cases are consolidated for { judgment and one bill of cost taxed, On the charge of abandon and non=support prayer for judgment is continued fora. period of THREE YEARS from this date, to-wit withdraws & plea On the charge of assault upon a famgle the judgment of the Court is that the ’ defendant pay the consolidated cost of the actions now before the court; that prayer for judgment be continued for a period of THREE YEARS from this date, to-wit, the 6th day of November, 1951, upon the following specific conditions: 1. That he violate no law of the State of N.C, 2. That he pay to his wife, the progecutri heréin, on each week beginning at 12 o'clock noon, on the 10th day of November, 1951, the sum of $10.00 per week, and in addition thereto, that he pay such medical and hospital bills as are reasonably necessary for the maintenance and support of both children, and that either parent have the right to visit and take home with them either child over week-ends or on reasonable occasions; "reasonable" being interpreted by the vourt to mean at least once a month, and that this applies to both children wherever they may be located, the defendant being specifi- cally prohibited from removing either child from the State of N. C. This provision applies likewise to the proxecutrix. This cause in so far as the Court is concerned shall remain open pending the further orders of the Court. eR SS RS Se Pe Se Se SN ee eT meme Oe ee ee ee ee Re PN se ‘No, 1213 State vs Reid Kenny NON-COMPLIANCE It is ordered that a capias be issued for the defendant. No. 1432 State vs Alton Dawes Crouch MANSLAUGHTER Sse The Solicitor takes a nol pros with S on recommendation of the prosecuting witne’, it being made to appear that the case been tried once and a mitrial. ap Upon the foregoing being made to appea?, Court directs that the defendant and bond be discharged. the No. 1607 RECKLESS DRIVING — Defendant through his avters , hee P McLai ghlin, enters a plea of KO a Dona}d Lee Lay Suby oueen and empanelied and — W-20 | a verdict of Guilty as charged int warrant and recommends mercy. the Judgment of the Court is pag y tle | defendant pay a fine of $50.00 & pa {| cost of this action. the 6th day of November, 1951. a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 6th, 1951 ‘Grand Jury Report, November Term, 1951 The Grand Jury passed on all bills that wre presented by the solicitor and found true bills in all cases except one. Committees were appointed to inspect the following county properties: County Jail A committee inspecting the jail found a total of one white female, eleven white males, one colored fenale, and nine colored males. fhe repairs which had been recomended previously are in the process of completion. The building is in a sanitary condition, County Home A committee visited the county home and found twenty-nine white inmates, ten colored inmates, three white prisoners, and six colored prisoners. This conmittee reports everything around the home in good condition and that the inmates are being well taken care of. Upon further investigation, the committee wishes to withdraw the recommendation made at the August term of court, thet an outside fire escape be added to the women's dormitory. At that time the committee was shown only one exit from this building by an employee who was guiding the prty. On the present inspection, an exit was siiow n at each end of the building, thereby giving adequate fire protection. Prison Camp The Grand Jury visited the prison cahip in a body. We found that there are eighty-nine prisoners at the present. All buildings and ® nm Y ea ar ¢ d for grounds are in excellent condition. *n° prisoners are well care We wish to commend those in charge of these three county properties for the admirable way in which they are discharging their duty. J. C. Murdock — URE Ho. 1640 |CRIME AGAINST MAT State” i Not a True Bill vs | Cecil Hager Wo, 157 | ATTEMPTED RAPE State ; i A True Bill vs Merriman Keller | wo, DRIVING DRUNK a - Gontimued for the State. vs | Oscar Leon Albea Se end es LOSES <a eT ¥ Noe. 1632 & 1633 State vs Homer A, Nantz lie | { | { l l { | { I \ { | { ! | { | 1 I i | | { | ! { I ‘No, 1213 | State vs i Reid Kenny i No » 1432 State v6 Alton Dawes Crouch Wo, 1607 State ‘ vs onajd Lee La W=20 : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WELK --- NOVEMBER TiiM, 1951 Tuesday, November 6th, 1951 ABANDON & NON-SUPPORT: ASSAULT ON A FEMALE 3 These two cases are consolidut trial. onsonsdated: for Defendant through his att R, yr ont enters a lea of bie On Jury Sworn and empaneiied. —— 6 During the trial the defendant wy fe his plea of Not Guilty and enters a 4 of Nolo Contendere. The two cases are consolidated for judgment and one bill of cost taxed, On the charge of abandon and non=support prayer for judgment is continued for a § period of THREE YEARS from this date, to-wt [4 the 6th day of November, 1951, ; x On the charge of assault upon a famale 4 the judgment of the Court is that the ’ me defendant pay the consolidated cost of the . actions now before the court; that prayer By for judgment be continued for a period of ; THREE YEARS from this date, to-wit, the 6th day of November, 1951, upon the following specific conditions: ‘ 1. Thset he violate no law of the State a of N.C. # 2. That he pay to his wife, the progecutrigy heréin, on each week beginning at 12 o'clock noon, on the l0th day of November, 1951, the sum of $10.00 per week, and in addition thereto, that he pay such nedical and hospital bills as are reasonably necessary for the maintenance and support of both children, and that either parent have the right to visit end take home with them either child over week-ends or on reasonable occasions; "reasonable" being interpreted by the vourt to mean at least once a month, and that this applies to both children wherever they may be located, the defendant being specifi- oably prohibited from removing either child from the State of N. C. This provision applies likewise to the proxecutrix. This cause in so far as the Court is concerned shall remain open pending the further orders of the Courte See eee Paes ne NON#COMPLIANCE It is ordered that a capias be issued for the defendant. MANSLAUGHTER The Solicitor takes a nol pros with vot on recommendation of the prosecute or ’ it being made to appear that the case been tried once and a mitrial. or Upon the foregoing being made to e ’ Court directs that the defendant an bond be discharged. the RECKLESS DRIVING Joba ® Defendant through his attorney, ievs McLaughlin, enters a plea of Not comet Jury sworn and empanelled and — a verdict of Guilty as charged int warrant and recommends mercy- he Judgment of the Court is that t y th defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and pa cost of this action. oA? IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 6th, 1951 ‘Grand Jury Report, Novenber Term, 1951 The Grand Jury passed on all bills that wre presented by the Mi i . , | solicitor and found true bills in all cases except one. i Committees were appointed to inspect the following county properties: * | Pam County Jail Hh a hey 2 . ° . . ‘ i oe A committee inspecting the Jail found a total of one white nd i 9 7 ; ti) a female, eleven white males, one colored fenale, and nine colored males. ait i} ' | fhe repairs which had been recomended previously are in the process | of completion. The building is in a sanitary condition, ————————— = = = TT YT — ; 3p tess gl me gn. So pla Na © 5 ale oe tao hed en m oS ae ee eis Seg RE Bi oe: og ie Se aa - Rs tian ae Sh this ae sy ps = he County Home A committee visited the county home and found twenty-nine white inmates, ten colored inmates, three white prisoners, and six colored Thie conmittee reports everythin, around the home in prisoners. SS a TT NE SE. a IR A AE SS —— — good condition and that the inmates are being well taken care 62 Upon further investigation, the conmittee wishes to witidraw the recommendation made at the August term of court, thet an outside fire escape be added to the women's dormitory. At that time the conmittee was shown only one exit from this building by an employee who was guiding the prty. On the present inspection, an exit was Siow n at each end of the building, thereby giving adequate fire protection. Prison Camp a body. We found that The Grand Jury visited the prison calip in there are eighty-nine prisoners at th present. All buildings and te 4 a origoners ar 911 cared for. grounds are in excellent condition, ‘1° prisoners are w er) y "Ope a We wish to commend those in charge of these three county properties for the admirable way in which they are discharging their duty. J. C. Murdock No. 1640 CRIME AGAINST MATURE Shake” | Not a True Bill vs | Cecil Hager Wo, 1573 | ATTEMPTED RAPE State i A True Bill vs Merriman Keller | Wo, 1602 DRIVING DRUNK State Continued for the State. vs Oscar Leon Albea . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR couRT 549 \ Tuesday, November 6th, 1951 | FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM iy a 1 Wednesday, November 7th, 1951. or upon his having found in his possession under any pretext in his filling station either liquor or a bed. i] Wo. 1498 } tani | “—. oe 4 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on e solicitor takes a Nol ‘a & mer r i } leave on re ol Pros with a M i ; comnendation aq Wednesday Morning, November 7th, 1951. William Henry Greene | and prosecuting oa the officers 4 ’ | Df. 150% i | “Wo. 1576 E ye | TRANSPORTING i | State — | DISPOSE MORTGAGE PROPERTY 2 a | uel SeEeeeane So the Court thes the | ve | Nol Pros With Leave a ie | appeal has not been perfected, the court ‘ll sea John Moss Mi Ralph Shue | orders that the defendant be imprisoned as We ie | ordered by thevourt. Further ordered that i} paee ; capias and commitment issue for him, his ‘Ht Pee ‘te. : a case not having been docketed in the Ltt ea Te | DRIVING DRUNK ik | Supreme Court. i, vs a oe called and failed. Judgment ee it hea ! Joseph Fulton | si Sci Fa and Instanter Capias. i ‘ iow’. ph Fulton Woods | vapias : a 1490 & 1491 POSSESS TAX PAID LIQUOR IN PLACE OF BUSINESS Wil (aa No. 1606 4 cave NOT USED AS RESIDENCE Wl boa = | DRIVING DRUNK . . 7 . — Defendant through his attorney, John R, Ht a I Defendant called and failed. Judg a aul Dewey White McLaughlin, enters plea of Guilty. 1h < Jose h Ful Ww | Nisi Sci Fa and Instanter Uapias sce oy In 1490, Judgment of the Court is that Nt ae sep ton Woods j . a Mig grt pay a fine of $500.00 and pay the Hi “4 a cost of this action. ia B In 1491, the Judgment of theJourt is that i a No. 1591 0 FALSE PRETENSE ae Tt. be confined in the comaon jail il ¥ State ) Defendant 4 of Iredell County for a period of TWO YEARS to Gi ee vs S west Gat ee i | be assigned to work on the roads as provided HT Be Arthur De Talbert ) — a | by law under the State Highway and Public ite Pf | Works Commission. Capias and commitment to Hi} 4 5 { issue at any time within two years from this a y a | date, to-wit, the 7th day of November, 1951, i f A | upon the defendant's failing to pay the cost why: | of this case at this term of court, or upon i | his violating any law of the State of N. U., i I i | ; | MANUFACTURING LIQUOR dios. 1625, 1626 Defendants through their attorney, J G Lewis, & 1627 State enter a plea of Not Guilty. vs Jury Sworn and empanelled. Court directed a verdict of Not Guilty. It Dempsey Vickers 4s ordered that the defendants and bondsmen be Daniel Eller Allen Wade Shue discharged. | Wo. 1465 j SPEEDING State : Defendant through his attorney, John R, McLaughlin, vs | enters a plea of Not Guilty. : Troy Fesperman j Jury swom and empanelled and returned a ) W=22 | verdict of Not Guilty. i It is ordered that the defendant and his | bondsman be discharged. HIT & RUN: NO OPERATOR'S LICENSE. No. 1 & 1 399 556 Defendant through his attorney, Hugh G Mitchell, Stat vs : enters a plea of Nolo Contendere in both cases. — John Lee Johnson On the charge of hit and run, judgment of the Court 0-2), is that the defendant be eonfined in the Gommon jail of Iredell County for a period of SIx MONTHS , and assigned to work on the roads as provided by law under the State Highway and Public Works ssion. a the charge of operating a car after his license had been revoked, the judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the Common : period of SIX MONTHS d assigned to work on the roads as provided by Seer aeeer tbe State Highway and ublic Works Thies i Commission, and that he shall rag: an a ns le on the highway of N. &. tor 4 Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, sotor vehicle oo tt nis wap of Me os Staring to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact that he was operating under revoked license after having been convicted or drivin Judgme November 7th, 1951, at 9:30 o'clock A, M, dr unk, mt absolute on tne bond, to be discharged — upon payment of $10.00 and the Gest. ath a fa acals } IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WSEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Wednesday, November 7th, 1951 te. _ | BREAKING, ENTERING & ASSAULT ON Fenaze Jury sworn and empanelled as follows: Ervin Edgar Young : : erecee Charles Mack, D H Lazenby, alias Mooney cCrary, J © Walker, C F Patterson, Lawrence M Reid, W J MeDade, J § p Mrs Etta Lowery, J M Hager and WI Johnson, to answer the following issue: "Is the defendant, Ervin Edgar Young alias Mooney, at this time mentally incompetent to plead to the bill of indictment wherein he is charged wth the crime of Breaking, Enterinz and Larceny? Answer: Yes", . obson, NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY State vs | | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 JUDGMENT Ervin Edgar Young alias Mooney. This cause coming on for trial upon a bill of indictment found by the Grand Jury of Iredell County charging the defendant with Breaking, Entering and Larceny, and it appearing to the Court, upon intimation of counsel representing the defendant, that the defendant does not have sufficient mental capacity to plead to the bill of indictment and to prepare his defense to said bill of indictment, and upon suggestion to the court that a proceeding should be held to determine the mental condition of the defendant before he is compelled to plead to the bill of indictment pending; thereupon a jury sworn and empanelled and testimony adduced before the court and jury tending to show that the defendant is of unsound mind, and the following issue being submitted to the jury: "Is the defendant, Ervin Edgar Young, alias Mooney, at this time mentally incompetent to plead to the bill of Indictment wherein he is charged with the crime of breaking, entering and larceny"? And the said issue having been answered by the Jury, "Yes": ' It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that this defendant, Ervin Edgar Young, alias “looney, be sent to the State Hospital at Goldsboro, N. C., there to be confined under the rules and regulations prescribed by the Board of Directors as prescribed by law, and there to be treated, cared for and maintained in said hospital until discharged as the law provides; said confinement not to be regarded as punishment for any offence. This the 7th day of November, 1H1. H, Hoyle Sink “pitied Judge Presiding. Wo. 1589 PASSING ON CREST OF HILL State Nol Pros With Leave. vs Hugh Bryant Wallace No. 1590 RECKLESS DRIVING State Defendant through his attorneys vs Hugh G. Mitchell, enters plea of Hugh Bryant Wallace Contendere. 4 t the i /F The judgment of the Court is tha jal defendant be confined in the common of Iredell County fo MONTHS and be assigned to work a roads as provided by law, and pay cost of this action. Capias and comnitment to + anf enforcement of the prison sentence 4 to-wit time within one year from t the 7th day of November, 1951, the defendant shall be found net ys oh, C, motor vehicle on the public high ati or for a period of 90 days from this - violate any law of the State at ail (Continued on page 551) ae IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 oul No. 1590 State vs Hugh Bryant Wallace W-18 Mo. 1586 State vs Hattie Simpson No. 1629 State vs Leslie Martin Kelly We Wos. 1617, 1618 & 1619 State vs James W. Baker fo. 1623 State vs John Thomas Carry C-17 Aio, 1615 State vs Frank Privette W-19 Alo. 1611 State vs Bill Harris W-22 nee Pa — ees ee cate eee pear ce ee at ee Pet se Wednesday, November 7th, 1951 RECKLESS DRIVING (Continued from page 550) during said one year period. Judgment absolute on the bond, to be discharged upon payment of the cost of the Sci Fa. POSSESS NON-TAX PAID LIQUOR Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. SPEEDING Defendant enters plea of Nolo contendere. Judsment of the Court is that prayer for judgment be continued on payment of the Cost. FORGERY Defendant through his attomey, Hugh G. Mitchell, enters plea of Nolo Vontendere. In No. 1617, the judgment of the vourt is that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison at Raleigh, N. C., for not less than three nar more than four years, to be assigned to such labor as he may be found physically and mentally able to perform, after psychiatric and physica examination, under the State Highway and Public works Comaission. In Nos. 1618 and 1619, judgment of the court is that the defendant be confined in the State's Prison at Raleigh, N. C., for not less than taree nor more than four years, to be assigned to such labor as he «aay be found physically and or le to perform, after psychiatric and physica iaonilen, under the Beate Highway and Public Works Comnission. These sentences to run con~= currently with the sentence imposed in No. 1617. BREAKING & ENTSRING Defendant through his attorney, John R. McLaughlin, enters a plea of Guilty of forcible trespassing which plea the State accepts. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Defendant through his attorney, John 3, McLaughlin, enters 4 plea of Not Guilty. ' The Solicitor takes a nol pros with leave on the breaking and entering charge. Defendant enters a plea of Nolo Cmtendere to the charge of Larceny. Judgment of the Court is that prayer for judgment be continued for a period of TwO YEARS from this his d that he pay the cost of this action at t saea ad can he obey all rules and regulations f Court; of the State Probation Authority into whose custody he is ordered during said period of time. REAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY , Defendant through his attorney, J. G@ Lewis, rs a plea of Not Guilty. on The Solieitor takes a nol pros with leave on preaking and entering chargé. — wy netentans enters a plea of Nolo Contendere to the clarge of Larceny. Judgment of the Court is that prayer for judgment be continued for 4 period of TWO YEARS from this date and that he pay the cos term of court; that he obey of the State P horit 7. who » is ordered of ti — 2 robation Author2*) As 56 ceil —_ 4 Le t of this action at this rules and regulations = se custody — ——EE eae ee ores f 1 | No, 1612, 1633 | & 161L State 1 vs . Bidful Privette W-18 Wo. 1594 State vs P, W. Byers dNo. 1543 State vs Gaston Tuck ) ( 2«~ # No. 1437 State vs Harold E Roseman Wo. 1438 State vs Harold E, Roseman No. 1557 State vs Fred Junior Lackey Wo. 1636 State vs Brice P Kistler IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST weiK --+- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Wednesday, November 7th, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Wednesday, November 7th, 1951 BREAKING, ENTERING & LARCENY Defendant enters plea of Guilty as charged. Solicitor takes a Nol Pros With 1 on breaking and entering charge, In hl 1412,0n the charge of Larceny, judgment of the court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Ipedel} County for a period of SIXTY DAYS to work in and around the jail under Super- vision of High Sheriff and jailer, In No. 1613, Prayer for judgment is continued for a period of two years on the condition the defendant pay the cost of this action on or before the lst day of april, 1952, and that he violate none of the laws of the State of N. C, during said period of time. ABANDON AND NON-SUPPORT The defendant through his attorneys, Messrs.Trivette and J. G, Lewis, moves the Court that the action be dismissed, Motion allowed. MURDER Solicitor in open court states that he will not ask for a verdict of Guilty of murder in the first degree but will ask for verdict of guilty of manslaughter. Defendant withdraws his plea of Not Guilty and enters a plea of Guilty to Involuntary manslaughter which plea the State accepts, The Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confimed in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX MONTHS, and assigned to work in and around the County Jail under the supervision of the High Sheriff and Jailer. VIOLATING CITY ORDINANCE Nol Pros With Leave. VIOLATING CITY ORDINANCE Nol Pros With Leave. | POSSESS TAX PAID LIQUOR IN BLDG NOT USED {| AS DWELLING. | Continued. I SPEEDING Contimed. Alo. 1642 State vs Willard Chambers Kos. 1630 & 1631 State vs : Otho Herman Stutts Xo. 1628 State vs Jlayton Hagans io. 1603 State vs Press Bustle Wo. 1596 State vs Troy Adams 4io. 1597 State vs Durand Feimster No. 1598 State vs Durand Feimster ‘No. 1573 State vs Merriman Keller =< >< — e —_ ee Se Ree Ra Re ee ee ome es DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY Continued, SPESVING: RECKLESS DRIVING Continued. LARCENY Continued. SPEEDING. Nol Pros With Leave. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Nol Pros With Leave. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Nol Pros With Leave. LARCENY Nol Pros With Leave. ATTEMPTED RAPE Continued for term on motion of defendant. be ae | RECKLESS DRIVING. en 7 i Continued. Julian Smith Morni This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Wo. 1662 | DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY A, November 13th, 1951, at 10:00 o'clock A+ Me , ae State j Contined hg UY eh ull vs i x http AP dM Weldon Campbell i om IGE PRESIDING/ at IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK == NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR Court, IREDELL COUNTY. NOVEMBER Thikm, 1952 This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment on Tuesday Morning, November 13th, 1951 at 10:00 O'clock, with Honorable H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and holiing Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial Vistrict, Fall Term, 1951, present and presiding. J. G. Rumple, High Sheriff of Iredell Vounty returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men and women to serve as jurors for this the Second Week of the November erm, 1951, Iredell vounty Superior Vourt, to-wit: J. U. McNeely Mrs. Jamie T. surgess J H Hewitt, dr Kent S. Kerr Clarence Stimpson Jr. J, K, Ulendenin Mrs DU. L. McKay Mrs Glenn Montgomery w, E, Holcomb W. H. McGraw A, P. Vavidson R, 8B. Wilson John G. Kennerly 3. Gabriel Mrs. U. 0. Caldwell Lawrence C, Miller, QO, Blackwelder T. S, Coffey, St. Clement &. Pless+ F. R. Alexander Mrs. UC. v, Smita N. Q. Harris Z. Goforth J. U. Gollins Mrs. T. S. White Paul L. Plyler i. N. Sloan f, L. Raymer Mrs Irvin Steele E. G, Cowan Lawrence © Miller and Mrs C. OU. Caldwell wereexcused by Doctor's Certificate, Clement &, Pless was excused by the court until January Term, 1952. Robert Warren appeared for jury duty as ordered by the Court. N. Q. Harris was excused by the Court. and women The following men/constitute what shall hereinafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: J.C. McNeely, Kent S. Kerr, Mrs. D. be McKay, W. H. McGraw, John G, Kennerly, Mrs. I. 5. White, K. le Raymer, Mrs. Jamie T. Burgess, Vlarence Stimpson, Jey Mrs. Glenn Montgomery, M. 3. Gabriel and &,. VU. slackwelder. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK <= NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Tuesday, November 13, 1951 Ho. 1605 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court. Iredell County. | November Term, 1951, STATE i Vs. { JUDGMENT G. A, Benfield I The defendant, G. A. Benfield, enters a plea of Guilty of abandonment and nonesupport of his children named and mentioned in the warrant. Prayer for Judgment continued for five years from this date, November 7th, 1951, on condition thit the defendant pay to the mother of said children the sum of 350,00 on this date, and the Curther sums of 325.00 per month for tne support and maintenance of said children, tne first payment to be made on the 5th. day of Vecember, 1951, ani a like sum of $25.00 on the fifth day of each ani every montana thereafter during said tive year period. And on tne further condition that tne defendant pays the costs of this action at this term of tne vourt. bach parent shall have the right to visit the children. This cause is retained for further oriera of the GLourt as to the support and maintenance of the said children. This November 7th, 1951. This judgment is consented to by the defendant and his wife. G. A, Benfield _ Defendant Mable Benfield __ eo efendant fos. 1558, —— ss the three defendants, it is ordered d commitment not he Court that capias an Lottie Bell cloud bY jue until 12:00 O'clock Noon, November 30th, her o Lillie Cloud 1951. It is furt Louise NeGeee be allowed to go under same bond, rdered that the defendants IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 13th, 1951 Ao. 5144 : a Calvin E. Cashion } DIVORCE a The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn vs empanelled answers the issues subaittes oe” it as follows: Helen Muse Cashion North Carolina In the Superior Vourt Iredell County November Term Calvin &,. Vashion { vs. j ISSUES | Helen Muse Cashion j 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer. eee II. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina, Iredell an County for more than six months preceding the filing of this complaint? Cs Answer. Yes. TT III. Did the plaintiff separate from the defendant and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the complaint? Answer. tess Yes. a NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM Calvin &,. Vashion Vs. JUDGMENT Helen Muse Cashion This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at the November term, 1951 Superior Court of Iredell County, before his Honor H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff and against the and it appearing to the Court defendant, as fully appears in the record: that no children were born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretoSore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendnat. This the 13th day of Nov., 1951. tale Sie — KR ee ee eH IN THE SUPE«IOR CUURT . IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TSRM, 1951 Me Tuesday, November 13, 1951 Ko. 4888 North Carolina In the Superior Court i} Iredell County it Wayne & Brannon it vs. : JUUGMENT UF NUNSUIT ® B Stone Finance Company, Inc. : | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the i Honorable H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding at tne November Civil Term, 1951 of the Iredell County Superior Vourt, and it appearing to the vourt from the statement of the attorney for plaintiff, that the plaintiff desires to be allowed to take a voluntary nonsiit in this action. It is therefore ordered, aijudge!, and decreed that the plaintiff The cest to be ; be and he is hereby allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. paid by the plaintiff. | ii, Hoyle Sink i i +8 piace . Ht Hon. H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding Lie ne c ue me we OK OR i i 1 hae flo. 5130 a ‘ee Chi QIVORUE : ee Charles Tatum The Vivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Rie vs empanelled answers tie issues submitted to it WA | as follows: WL Lavinia Byers Tatum I THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERI IREDELL COUNTY Charles Tatum | Plaintiff | Vs. | Lavinia Byers Tatum | Defendant the State of North Carolina » ¢ 5 f VU t 1, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident 0 the institution of this action? for at least six months next preceding Answer: Yes. — awfully married as alleged in the 2, Were the plaintiff and the defendant l Complaint? Answer: Yes. arate and apart from each » 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived sep his action? other for two years prior to the institution of t Answer: Yes, In THE SUPERIOR COURT SEQOND WEEK -~- November Term, 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Charles Tatum Plaintiff | Vs. | JUUGMENT Lavinia Byers Tatum | Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been properly served with process and the jury having answered the issue submitted to them by the Vourt. Now, therefore, on the motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, attorneys for the plaintiff it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Charles Tatum be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Lavinia Byers Tatum, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are dissolved. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the Bth day of November, 1951. H. Hoyle Sink _ a Judge Presiding wok Kk oe eK OK ok em Wo. 515k Willis Sharpe DIVORCE The Vivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: vs Minnie Allison Sharpe NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR OOURT IREDELL CUUNTY Willis Sharpe ] Plaintiff Vs. ISSUES Minnie Allison Sharpe Defendant 1. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for at least six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: _Yes. ic 2, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: __Yes. a seaoit cane SUPERIOR COURT a SEK e= NOVEMBER TERM, 1 Tuesday, November 13, 1951° = 09 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years prior to the institution of this action? Answer: _YeSe eee ee NORTH CAROLINA IN TH# SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Willis Sharpe Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. Minnie Allison sharpe Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November term of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, and it appearing to the Vourt 2 that the defendant tas been properly served with process ani the jury he + having answered the issue submitted to them by the Vout. Now, therefore, on the motion of Land, Sowers and Avery, attorneys for the plaintiff it is ordered, adjudgei and decreed that the plaintiff Willis Sharpe be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Minnie Allison Sharpe, and that tae bonds of matrimony hereto- fore existing between the plaintifr and te defendant be and they are dissolved. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 13 day of November, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink Judge Presiding oe OK x * a oe Nos-4906 Witten f-McGraw ys-Mildred Nantz McGraw --------"-""" Cont-énued Wo. 5002 Ethel Cashion Campbell vs James Lester Campbell --------~ Continued Ne.-50i2 ElvaBass-vs-Fremk-Bess ----" ae -Contdnved 7) Mio, 509, Ada Carrie Candler vs Floyd Candler «---~~-""""~ . Continued No. 5108 Rachel Odessa Connor vs Garfield Connor ----~~~ _n-n----+++Cont inued Wo, 5121 Samuel J Cashion, Sr vs Lillian Ruth H. Cashion ----~ ---Cont inued No. 5137 D B Ketchie vs Mollie Ketchie - ceccdecwece----------- Cont ages Wo. 5140 John Ross Bowie ve Ruby York Bowleee----------" -- Continued "No. 4751 M L Walker vs Wade Marlowe ee seahounquan nen aePS Hr. ase Continued IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK’ == NOVEMBER ‘ten, 1952 Tuesday, November 13, 1951 No. 5160 Gertrude C,. Mills | DIVORCE Vs. sseleatign snevers’ the testes SUnitee cts as follows: - Ralph T. Mills NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Gertrude CG, Mills Vs. Ralph T. Mills 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: _Yes. II. Hes the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for nore than six months preceding the filing of this complaint? Answer: Yes. III. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more al alleged in the complaint? Answer. _Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Gertrude U. Mills Vs. JUDGMENT _ Ralph T. Mills i This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at the November term, 1951 Superior Coirt of Iredell County, before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Fresiding and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record: and it appearing to the Court that there were born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant three children, one who is a minor, namely: Donald age eleven years, and the plaintiff herein has the care and custody of said child; and it further appearing to the fourt, and the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the minor child, Donald, and that the best interest of said minor would be served by being in the custody of their Mother, she being a fit person for the custody of said minor. It, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the ponds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered, ad judged IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TeRy 1951 1931 Tuesday, November 13, and decreed that the plaintiff Gertrude C. Mills, be and she is hereby awarded full and complete care, custody and control of the minor child, Donald, age ll years. This sili in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, is retained for further order. This the 13th day of Nov., 1951. H. Hoyle Sink Judge Presiding KK Om No. 5146 Larry C. Brewer DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and emoanelled vs. answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Bertha Leonard Brewer IN THE SUPERIGi’ COURT pers ce NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 IREDELL COUNTY. Larry C. Brewer vs. ISSUES Bertha Leonard Brewer 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. ———<—$_$_$_ 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the . institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. n a borifide resident of the State of North e commencement of this action, 3. Has the plaintiff bee Carolina for more than six months before th alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. —————— In the Syperior Court, November Term, 1951. North Carolina, | Iredell County. Larry C,. Brewer NT vs, JUDGME Bertha Leonard Brewer | rd at this Term of the be heard and being hea Honor, H. Hole This cause coming on to before His Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, be ury having answered the issues Sink, J jand a jury, and the J » Yudge Presiding, an nd against the tiff a submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plain defendant, as set out in the record: _IN-THE SUPERIOR “COURT: -- SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. _ ow’ " Tuesday, November 13th, 1451 ; SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER’ TERM, 1951 063 Tuesday, November 13, 1954 ; Ht | It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds ; i i i IT IS, therefore, ordered, adjudged ; 18 of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Larry C. Brewer 3 : er ce een ee ee i ’ me a ‘tmony heretofore existing ; : I and the defendant, Bertha Leonard Brewer, be, and the same are hereby ssn eeaaiaiiad ee eee ee i defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is HI i, dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the Ve il defendant, yee Beak - hereby granted and absolute divorce from the defendant. | "dudge Presiding. This the 13 day of Nov., 1951. i ; , , ae ie a ala rau H. Hoyle Sink * * xc * koe _ ¥ © a age sei 7"? Ps ~~Judge Presiding | No. 5145 bs a ae ae ae a a a Myrtle Sigmon Hefner | DIVORCE nl (ical | The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and a Wie Vs. | empanelied answers the issues submitted to a4 Hi a | {| it as follows: ] No. 5138 ta John Milton Hefner ! as dei de pvoRc aa - ia R e Divorce Jury eing duly sworn an ae NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Vs empanelled answers the issues submitted to it | IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM, | oe Lottie Mae Johnson Myrtle Sigmon Hefner io Vs. ISSUES be NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT it a John Milton Hefner * IREDELL COUNTY hl a 4 James S, a, Jr + a 1. Did the plaintifffand the defendant intermarry as alleged in the ; Plaintiff | Ny Ki complaint? *; Vs. ISSUES. lf ‘ ie Ee Answer. _Yes, id Lottie Mae Johnson Mh rs Defendant ih II. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina, ia ; ee i te 1. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolin Ha Iredell County for more than six months preceding the filing of this : ion? for at least six months next preceding the institution of this action: complaint? Answer. [¢8:___ Answer: yes. — lleged in the fully married as alleged in III. Did the plaintiff separate from the defendant and have they lived 2. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully ; eC > separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the omplaint Answer: _ Yes. complaint? apart from eac h 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and Answer. Yes. is action? a other for two years prior to the institution of this ¥; NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Answer: _ Yes. IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER TERM Myrtle Sigmon Hefner Vs. JUDGMENT John Milton Hefner r This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at the Novembe term, 1951 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, H. Hoyle sues Sink, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the 48 submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, 46 fully appears in the record: and it appearing to the Court that no children were born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant. i i. i i , i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT? - SECOND WEEK’=- November Term, 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY James S. Johnson, Jr. Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Lottie Mae Johnson Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, li. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November tern of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the defendant has been properly served with process and t.e jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the court. Now, therefore, on the motion of Land, Sowers and Avery, attorneys for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged and decrecd that the plaintiff James S. Johnson, Jr., be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Lottie Mae Johnson, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are dissolved. And it further appearing to the court, and the court finding as a fact that there was one minor child born to the marriage, namely, Alice Faye Johnson, age 4, who has been living with her father, James S. Johnson, Jr., the plaintiff, since the separation of her parents, and it further appearing to the court and the court findsing as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the said minor child, and that the best interest of the said child would be served by being in the custody of herfather. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and he is hereby granted full and complete control and custody of the said minor child until further order of the court. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 13th day of November, 195l. a Hoyle Sink __._-— 1d ge res ° me me KK a mK OK at ee tou hi ia os ry a ie * es i? i 4 Sy a SRS ey a ee oe er ae es ae ; Tee tte IN-THE SUPERIOR COURT , SECOND WEEK == NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 069 i Tuesday, November 13th, 1951 ne fo. 513k | Beulah Deal Jolly | DIVORCE i The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Nt vs | empanelled answers the saseet subaitted to t i as follows: i Robert Edward Jolly { NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 ee IREDELL COUNTY Beulah Deal Jolly a Plaintiff a Vs ISSUES |e Robert Edward Jolly, Wee Defendant hag 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now i husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? ¥ Answer: _YeS. i 4 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate from each other, i and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years continuously prior to the institution of this action? Answer:__Yes. __ 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the S,ate of North Carolina for more then six months prior to the conmencem ent of this i q ¥ action? Answer: Yes. NN NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Beulah Deal Jolly Plaintiff Vs JUDGMENT Robert Edward Jolly, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the North Carolina, before, Hig Honor, H,. Hoyle Superior Court of Iredell County, Sink, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues ff and against the submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plainti defendant, as set out in the record: e, ordered and adjudged b en the plaintiff, Bevlah Deal Jo y the Court that the bonds It is, therefor lly and of matrimony heretofore existing betwe and the same are dissolved, md the the defendant, Robert Edward Jolly be, ce from the defendant. ge Presiding Plaintiff is granted an absolute divor eeee ee Le ii 1 i ii if i ' a} 1 ...IN--THE SUPERIOR ‘COURT. - © SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 13th, 1951 No. 5132 A. Arthur Cheek DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly s vs. { empanelled answers the issues submitted e it as follows: Bertha Creedmore Cheek STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL A. Arthur Cheek Vs. ISSUES SS a ee Pe Bertha Creedmore Cheek Has the plaintiff been a resident and citizen of the State of North Carolina for more than twelve months next preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER: Yea. Were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the Compaint? ANSWER: Yes, Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER: _Yes, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL A. Arthur Cheek /V8. JUDGMENT Bertha Creedmore Cheek This cause coming on to be heard and having been heard at tle November, 1951, term of Superior Court of Iredell County, before Honorable H. Hoyle Sink and a jury and the jury having answered the Issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as set forth in the record in this case. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, A. Arthur Cheek and the defendant, Bertha Creedmore Cheek, be and they are hereby dissolved, and the said plaintiff, A. Arthur Cheek 18 hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Bertha Creedmore Cheeks It is further ordered that the costs of this proceeding be paid by the plaintiff. This the 13 day of November, 1951 $ age rres ng xe eK KK OS ES 5) BORER Se we Bao RE SSS a eS ere LR a Seay era Se a Barak st Dagens aaah NRE TR eee ee Snes ae a ae > ca i ard SECOND WEEK =~ NOVEMBER Sunn 56 T on BER ‘TERM \ my Tuesday, November a3; 195t 1951 7 | No. 5129 | f Rosalie B. Sherrill | DIVORCE i The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and " Vs. empanelled answers the issues submitted to it i as follows: Jemes Leonard Sherrill NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Rosalie B. Sherrill Plaintiff | | Vs. | ISSUES James Leonard Sherrill Defendant 1. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for at least six months next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. i od { 2, Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the | % Complaint? Answer: Yes. ——— 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from i oA each other for two years prior to tne institution of this action? Answer: _Yes. i NT NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | i IREDELL COUNTY es Rosalie B,. Sherrill Plaintiff T Vs. JUDGMEN James Leonard Sherrill Defendant ! i | heard and being neard before His THIS CAUSE coming on to be Honor H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November term g e court of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to th properly served with process by d to them by the court. publication, that the defendant has been and the jury having answered the issues submitte d. Sowers and Avery, attorneys Now, therefore, on the motion of Land, he plaintiff for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that tne p divorce Rosalie B. Sherfill be and she 4s hereby granted an absolute div atrimon from the defendant James Loenard Sherrill, and that the bonds of m y dant be and heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defen they are dissolved. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK’-- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 1941 And it further appearing to tne court and the court finding as a fact that there were three minor ciiildren born to the marriage, namely: Barbara Sherrill, age 11; Peggy Sherrill, age 6 and Wayne Sherrill, age 3, who have been living with their mother, Rosalie B Sherrill, the plaintiff, since the separation of their parents, and it further appearins to the court and the court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the said minor children, and that the best interest ofthe said children would be served by being in the custody of their mother. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and she is hereby granted full and complete control and custody of the said minor children until further order of the court. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 13th day of November, 195l. H. Hoyle Sink _ oudge Presiding _ oe v WO, 5123 Charles W. Barker DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and vs empanelled answered the issues submitted to Mildred Gowan Barker 8 a8 Soblows: North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Charles W. Barker -vs- Mildred Gowan Barker 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant marries, 4s alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell County for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes. initia eli 6 Siete ceacke: e a i i Fr, i * & e ¥ f Pee Sree IN THE SUPERIOR COURT - SECOND WEEK’ == NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 191 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT November Term, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Charles W, Barker -V5- JUDGMENT Mildred Gowan Barker This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge holding the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to taem in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as appears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of marriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorcefrom the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. H. Hoyle Sink Tudge Presiding. WO. 5097 Henry Edward Torrence | DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and Vs. empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Annie Elizabeth Torrence IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Henry Edward Torrence, Plaintiff Vs. Annie Elizabeth Torrence, Defendant I. intiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Were the pla ANSWER: Yes. Il. the defendant bee ££ and he institution 0 n separated and lived apart Have the plainti f this action? for two years immediately preceding t ANSWER: Yes. III. resident of th eer the institution e state of North Carolina Has the defendant of this action? for six months immediately preceding ANSWER: Yes. s SS gata aeanae Deane Ee ere a 2 ‘ wie Oa i Vs. ~IN THE-.SUPERIOR COURT - SECOND WEEK’ == NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Henry Edward Torrence, Plaintiff | JUDGMENT Annie Elizabeth Torrence, Defendant THIS CAUSE COMING ON TO B& HEARD AND BEING HEARD before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November tern, 1951 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been personally served with process, and the follow- ing issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: I. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as aileged in the Complaint? i ANSWER: Yes. II. f Have the plaintiff and defendant been separated and lived separately and apart for two years immediately preceding the institution of this action? ANSWER: Yes iil. Has the defendant been a resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the institution of this action? ANSWER: Yes NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of John RK. McLaughlin, attorney for the plaintiff, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Henry Edward Torrence, be and he is uereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Annie Blizabeth Torrence, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 13 day of Nov. 195k. H, Hoyle Sink Judge Presi ing REE KH KE KH KK HH OF i TRAE MERION AS e [ i | fe be bid i d 2 --- IN THE SUPERIOR CO SECOND WEEK’=- NOVEMBER TE 1951 1 Tuesday, November 13, 19 ty 1) Ao. 5045 ag en. Allan L. Campbell DIVORCE Wee The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled He VS answers the issues shaketel to it as follows: ' se Lena 0. Campbell { em be North Carolina : ie In the Superior Court i Iredell County \ Allan L, Campbell i Lai vs, | ISSUES | Lena 0. Campbell | ) a ee 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married | a | as alleged in the complaint? eae Answer: _ Yes. @ 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: _Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State a — of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the bringing of this action? a ip Answer: _Yes. ue ee North Carolina In the Superior Court ie i Iredell County tek Allan L. Campbell } Vs. i JUDGMENT Lena 0, Campbell } | . This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, H, Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding and a jury at the November term of the i h Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to tle court that the es defendant has been personally served with process, and the following issu having been submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant in the complaint? lawfully married as alleged Answer: "Yes." the defendant lived separate and apart 2. Have the plaintiff and Peis from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this actio "Yes." ; - fide resident of the State aintift becrens next preceding the bringing of this Answer: 3. Has the pl North Carolina for more t action? Answer: "Yes." - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT- SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER’ TERN, 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 1951 Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Allan L, Campbell be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Leno 0. Campbell, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 13th day of November, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink __ udge rresiding ae ‘No. 4762 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County W. W. Goodrum | Vs | Judgment of Nonsuit Vera Loretta Goodrum | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding at the November Civil Tern, 1951 of the Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorney for plaintiff, that the plaintiff desires to be allowed to take a volunt-ry nonsuit in this action. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be and he is hereby allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. The cost to be paid by the plaintiff. H, Hoyle Sink __ Hoh. H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding eK KKK HK OR OK OK OH j i. ae BREAKING & ENTERING m © Judgment of the Court is that the defendant © - confined in the common jail of Iredell County =) ia John Thomas Corry a period of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, assigned to we. under the State Highway and Public Works Commis ____--IN-THE SUPERIOR COURT. SECOND WEEK == NOVEMBER’ TERM, 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 1954 fo. 5151 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County John W, Newman i vs. | Judgment of Nonsuit Darrell Hudspeth j This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding at the November Civil Term, 1951 of the Iredell County Superior Court, aud it appearing to the Court from the statement of the attorney for plaintiff, that the plaintiff desires to be allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this action. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff be and he is hereby allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit. The cost to be paid by the plaintiff. H. Hoyle Sink : ee Hon. i Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding Mo. 5133 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Willis Rhodes i vs. | Judgment of Nonsuit Darrell Hudspeth i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding at the November Civil Term, ing he Court 1951 of the Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to oe he tf ntiff from the statement of the attorney for plaintiff, that tne plai t inthis action. desires to be allowed towake 4 voluntary nonsui ed that the plaintiff It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decre e a voluntary nonsuit. The cost to be be and he is hereby allowed to tak paid by the plaintiff. k —_—— fos Hovde oye Sink, Judge Presiding one eee eee t SF _.... IN THE SUPERIOR cOURT SECOND WEEK 2- NOVEMBER T 1951 Tuesday, November 13, 4851 : No. 5065 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County eee: 1951, term Vv ourt Fred W. Hudson j vs. i RECEIVER'S REPORT Moor Food Store, Inc. i R. M. Linker, receiver, Moor Food Store, Inc., respectfully shows the court that the following is a true and accurate account of the transactions of the receivership as of this date: Receipts Sale-Cold drinks box Sale-Electric fan Sale-Victor frozen food cabinet Sale-Dodge delivery truck ($150 less $106.98 due on chattel mortgage) Accounts receivable Sale of merchandise Total Receipts Disbursements Mrs. Fleeta Day-balance chattel mortgage on victor *rozen Food cabinet W. S. Neel-rent Local Insurance Agency-receiver's bond Billy Douglas-labor Jerry Westmoreland-labor Total Disbursemets Balance in bank This 13 day of November, 1951. R. M, Linker ~ Receiver North Carolina Iredell County Sworn to and subscribed before me this 13 day of November, 1951+ ovary Fubiic My commission expires_April 4, 1953 Confirmed and approved this 13 day of November, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink udge Presiding a Mo. 5161 North Carolina Iredell County. Norman Wesley Connor VSe Mattie Johnson Connor es IN THE SUPERIOR COURT _ SECOND WEEK += NOVEMBER TERM, 19521 Tuesday, November 13, 1951 In the Superior Court, November Term, 1951 1 i I This cause coming on to be heard at the November, Term, 1951, of the Superior Court of Iredeli County, before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, upon the application of the plaintiff for a removal of said action to another county upon the ground that the convenience of witnesses apd the ends of justice would be promoted by the change, and it appearing to the Court after considering the evidence submitted that the said application should be allowed, in the discretion of the Court: It is now ordered that this action be removed for trial from Iredell County to the Superior Court of Rowan County, for trial; It is further ordered that all original papers filed in this case be transmitted to Rowan County t o which the case is removed. This the 13th day of November, 1951. fio. 4901 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Joe D, Raymer, Vs. Thomas W, Griffin and Plaintiff, H. Hoyle Sink .» ss Judge Presiding and Holding Court in the Fifteen th Judicial District of North Carolina in which Iredell and Rowan Counties are located. a ee ee x * In the ageree Court November Term, 1951. Mrs. Thomas W, Griffin, Defenda,ts. 1. Was the Pla the Defendants as alleged i intiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of n the Complaint? ANSWER _ Yes: am 2. If so, did the Raymer, by his own negligence, driver of the Plaintiff's automobile, Billy contribute to the damage to Plaintiff's automobile as alleged in the Answer? ANSWER: _Yes. vi 3. What damage, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover? ’ ANSWER _ None. —_— This Honorable Court t November lth, at 9:30 o'cloc akes a recess until Wednesday Morning, fj a oe k A. Me. Y IN THE.SUPERIOR COUR? ws SECOND WEEK--’ NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Wednesday, November 14, 1951 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday Morning, November 14th, 1951 at 9:30 O'clock, flo. 5124 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY NOVEMBER CIVIL TERM, 1951 Iredell County Board of Education I ! a -Vv- i JUDGMENT " Zeb V. K. Dickson i This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge of the Superior Court holding the Courts in the Fifteenth Judicial District, at Statesville, N. C., at this term of court, and a jury, and being heard, the following proceedings were had: The Plaintiff offered evidence of witnesses, including documentary evidence, and rested. At the close of all the evidence, the defendant moved for judgment of non suit, as relates to all of the testimony and evidence offered. After hearing the evidence offered by the Plaintiff, and argument of Counsel, the Court being of the opinion that the Office of the Principal of the Central School by the Defendant in this action, under the provisions of the Statutefor the school year 1950-51 was not lawfully terminated under the evidence and testimony presented in this cause appearing in the record, and the Court being of the opinion that the acts were in all respects in conformity with the Statute. save and except the confirmation by the District County Board of Education approv- atior ing the acts of the Committee of the Central District, and Superintendent of Bdue done July 23, 1951, which document tends to show a blanket approval of amy action taken by the School Committee of the Central District. WHEREUPON, the Motion for Judgment as of Non Suit by the Defendant is sustained, and the Plaintiff in apt time excepts. If IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That the said action be, and the same is hereby non suited. IT IS FURTHER CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That the Defendant recover costs of the action, to be taxed by the Clerk. H, Hoyle Sink ine APPEAL ENTRIES to The Plaintiff, in apt time and in open court, objects and excepts ent and gives notice evo the ruling of the Court and to the signing of the judgm BM ag a Seater a ei a5 IN .THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK =’ NOVEMBER TiN, 1951 Wednesday, November 14, 1951 of appeal to the supreme Court, of North Carolina. Notice given in open court, and further notice waived on the part of the Defendant. The Court finding as a fact that the Plaintiff is an Agency of the State of North Carolina, does not require an appeal bond in this cause. The Plaintiff appellant shall be allowed sixty days in which to make up and serve statemmt of case on appeal, and the Defendant appellee shall be allowed forty days thereafter in which to make up and serve countercase, or file Exceptions. This the 14th day of November, 1951. H. Hoyle Sink _ he. 5162 Flossie Maxwell DIVORCE -VSs- The Divorce Jury #1" be'r>zg duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it George T. Maxwell as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPEXIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Flossie Maxwell | -vs- | ISSUES George T. Maxwell 1. Were the Plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years nex Answer. Yes. ff been a resident of Iredell County for siz ainti 3. Has the pl ment of this action? months immediately preceding the commence Answer. Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR come NORTH CAROLINA November Term, IREDELL COUNTY Flossie Maxwell JUDGMENT -Vs- \ I George T, Maxwell This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge rm of Iredell Superior Cou tted to them in favor of the plaintiff rt and a jury, and the holding the regular te jury having answered the issues submi in the record: and against the defendant, 8 appears onsidered and adjudged that the bonds It is, therefore, ordered ¢ t preceding the commencement of this action?, a IN THE SUPERIOR COuRT SECOND WEEK-- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Wednesday, November 14, 195) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «- NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 nds Thursday, November 15th, 1951 3 of marriage heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defend This Honorable Court convenes according to adjounrment he ant on Thureday Morning, November 15th, 1951 : t be, and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintife en : is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Ato. 4901 — | ih NORTH CAR In the Ss ior C Ki dade . uperior Court i: It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this é IREDELL COUNTY November Term, 1951. + be ad i action, : Joe D, Raymer, | : ly Plaintiff, i H, Hoyle Sink Vs. | JUDGMENT b i udge Presiding Thomas W. Griffin and Mrs. } i aK Ke OK OK OO Kk OK Ok Oe ok ok Thomas W, Griffin, | “No. 4906 ’ be Defendants. North Carolina, In the Superior Court This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor, Iredell County, i November Term, 1951 H, Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November, 1951 Term of the William B. McGraw 4 Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and the issues having 4 "4 been submitted to the jury and answered by them as follows: te ' JUDGMENT és 4 Mildred Nantz McGraw | bi "], Was the Plaintiff's automobile damaged by the negligence of the % S - Defendants as alleged in the Vomplaint? 7% This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell q : Lh C ANSWER _ Yes : || Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court ee a 2. If so, did the driver of the Plaintiff's automobile, billy Raymer, if that the Plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute ik + by his own negilgence contribute to the damage to Plaintifi''s automobile ea this action or he would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff | , a7) ipa swer? ite failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: as alleged in the answe i ¥ ANSWER Yes e it ————— It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, 3. What damage, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover? and the same is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the ANSWER None .” costs. easiness | 1H NOW, HEREFORE, IT Is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Plaintiff | This the 13th day of November, 1951 ’ 5 take nothing by this action; that the cost of the action be taxed against the H, Hoyle Sink aid ; | Plaintiff by the Clerk of Court. i North Carolina, on November 15, 1951. n. Bevis See Judge bresiding eRe eRe ee ea ee Entered in Statesville, ‘ ee ee ee i flo. 4993 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | NORTH CAROLINA . IREDELL COUNTY | Thomas F, McKay Plaintiff . This Honoable Court takes a recess until Thursday Moming, — eee ne November 15th, 1951 at 9:30 o'clock, A. M, — I | 1 Defendant | ic. | o © = = = 3 ect eae be heard and being heard before His Honor, ~dudge Presiding This cause coming on to November Term of the Superior Court of H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding at the to the court from the sta jn the pleadings have been agreed upon intiff and _ i] tement of counsel Iredell County and it appearing that all matters of controversy get out defendant has agreed to pay to the pla by the parties, and that the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM, 195) Thursday, November 16th, 1951 the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of Nine-Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($950.00) and the costs of this action in full accord and satisfaction thereof; Now, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff lave and recover of the defendant the sum of Nine-Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($950.00) and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Vlerk. This 15th day of November, 1951. H, Hoyle Sink _—_- udge Presiding ie Consent: Finch & Chamblee —s_—_ Attorneys for plaintiff R. A, Hedrick Attorney for defendant ‘No. 5136 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court November Tem, 1951. Howard Harris Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT I ! a) { TT eae eet Coty Myers Mitchell, X Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the November, 1951 Term of the Superia Court of Iredell County, North Carolina; and it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted on Sepember 7, 1951, and on this date a copy of the Complaint was filed in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County; that the Summons was personally served on the Vefendant, Coty Myers Mitchell, by Zeb Nicholson, Deputy Sheriff of Iredellcounty, on September 15, 1951; that no Answer, Demurrer, or other Pleadings have been filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, by the Defendant; that the time has elapsed for the Defendant to file an Answer, Demurrer, OF other Pleadings; that issues having been submitted to the Jury and answered by them as follows: 1. Was the Plaintiff 's automobile damaged by the negligence of the Defendant as alleged in the Plaintiff's Complaint? ANSWER "yes" . 2. What damages, if any, is the Plaintiff entitl from the Defendant? ed to recover ANSWER _ "$850.00". PE NORE ES TORT, Pees EEE Bere A apes ‘3 IN THE SUPSRIOR COURT Thursday, November 15th, 1951 IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGEV, AND DECREMD that the Plaintiff have and recover of the Defendant the sum of Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($850.00), together with interest thereon from the date of this judgment, together with the cost of this action to be taxed against the Defendant by the Clerk of Court, Entered in Statesville, North Carolina, on November 15, 1951. Fe Hoyre oie ge Presiding Re RRR KR KR RK KK No. 4197 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court November Term 1951 Mrs, Ruth Shives, i Plaintiff, | ? I ORDER Larry Osborne Shives, j Defendant. | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by His Honor H, Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding at the November Term, 1951 Iredell County Superior Court, upon the order entered by this Court on July 31, 1951, to show cause why the defendant should not be attached for contempt, and the Court finds: iin That the plaintiff is represented by Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys at Law, and the defendant by John G, Lewis and Hugh Mitchell, Attorneys at Law. a That at the August Term, 1946 Iredell Vounty Superior Court an is action in which the plaintiff was given custody born to the marriage union between order was entered in th of the minor child, Mary Ellen Shives, which child is now nine years of age, the plaintiff and defendant, and required xuxmakexferxcke s of said order was f Five Dollars ($5.00) per week and the defendant under the term nainkenancexandxsuppexrkxetxhk to pay the sum 0 ld. for the maintenance and support of the minor chi je That at the August Term, 1951 Iredel+ County Superior Court the sum of Four Hundred Fifty Dollars ($450.00) Defendant was in arrears in the 8 ort on the payments which he was required to make for the maintenance and supp on August 6, 1951, the rders of the Court, and of his child under the © : the Clerk of the Superior Court 0 defendant paid into the office of | | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK «= NOVEMBER TERM, 1952 Thursday, November 15, 1951 Iredell County for the support of his minor child the sum of [ Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), and by agreement of the Attorneys for the plaintiff and defendant, and by agreement of the plaintiff and defendant, the hearing on the order hereinabove referred to was continued to the November Term, 1951. he That the plaintiff and defendant were divorced in 1946, and the plantiff is now married, she now being Mrs. Ruth Peacock, and the defendant is also married; that the minor child, Mary Ellen Shives, is now living with her mother, Mrs. Ruth Peacock, -5e That the defendant has requested that he be pa mitted to have his minor daughter visit him. IT IS, THEREFORs, BY AND WITH THs CONSENT OF THE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. ‘That the defendant continue to make and keep up the Kd See Five Dollar ($5.0C) weekly payments for the maintenance and support efi & J of his minor daughter, as set forth in the order of the Court in x this action entered at the August Term, 1946. 2. That the defendant pay into the office of tne Ulerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County for the maintenarce and gupport of his minor daughter the Two Hundred Fifty Dollar ($250.00) amount which is now in arrears on said paymmts, as follows: A, One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) during this term of Court. B. Seventy-five Vollars ($75.00) on the first day of the March 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior Court, or on the first day that said Term of Court is scheduled to commence. C, Seventy-five Dollars ($75.00) on the first day of the May 1952 Term of Iredell County Superior Court, or on the first dey that said Term of Court is scheduled to commence. 3. That the defendant shall have the right and privilege to have his minor daughter, Mary Ellen Shives, with him from l0o'clock, A, M., on Saturday, November 17, 1951 until Sunday, November 18, 1951, at & o'clock, P. Me, and for a like period of time on Saturday and Sunday each two weeks thereafter, provided, however, that the defendant shall himself go personally to the home of the child's mother and get the child at the time above o the home of specified, and shall personally return the child t See! SS aaa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK = NOVeuMBri Terin, 1951 thursday, November 15th, 1951 her mother not later than & o'clock, P. M., on each Sunday that he has the child under this order, and provided further that the defendnat, during toe periods of time that he has his minor daughter under this order, shall personally be with her and look after and care for her, and shall on each Sunday morning that he has his daughter under this order, take her to the Sunday School and Church which she has been attending regularly, so that she can continue to attend her Sunday School and Churen regularly, and if he does not attend Sunday School and Church with her, that he shall be at the Church when Church is over to get her and look after her, and provided further that the defendant shall not at any time take said child out of the votate of North Carolina. 4. It is further ordered that the mother ot the minor child shall have the child dressed and ready tv go with her father at the times above necessary for her ready. of specified, and heave her clothes and other things 5. Any matter arising hereunder may be heard between Terms the Iredell County Superior Court by the Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District or the Judge Holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, upon such notice by either party as may be required by kw or which the Court may deem proper. 6, This cause is retained for further orders. ”. It 4s further ordered that the defendant pay all costs in connection with the affidavit, motion, and order to show cause which were entered and filed at the August Term 1951. This the 15th day of November, 1951. i i ge Presiding Consented to: Mrs, Ruth Peacock ici aint and Mother of the minor Child Mr, Larry Shives ...__-_------——~-~ Defendant and Father of the minor child eneeee ee 4 * No. ALE Siete” | ASSAULT OM sod commitnent to issue for the enforcement of ve { the sentence pronounced on November 5th, at oer Sone ‘ Marvin Ladd | within TWO YEARS from this date, to-wit; the ? oo ° W=23 1 November, 1951 provided the defendant shall wilfully { te support for his family or drink fail to provide adequa any intoxicating liquor of N. Ca and pay the co s or violate any law of the State st of this action. i ' bw | } | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Thursday, November 15, 1951 JNo. 4793 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY In the Superior Court November Term, 1951. N. Sankey Gaither, T/A Harmony Milling Company, Plaintiff, vs. Claude UL. Wheeler, Incorporated, and “he Travelers Indemnity Qompany, a Corporation, Defendants. 1. In what amount, if any, are the Defendants indebted to the Plaintiff? ANSWER None - ee + IN THE SUPERIOR COURT November Term, 1951 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY N,. Sankey Gaither, T/A Harmony Milling Company, Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGMENT Claude C. Wheeler, Incorporated, and The Travelers Indemnity Company, a Vorporation, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard at the November, 1951, term of Iredell Superior Court before his Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and the Jury, and the jury having answered the issue submitted to it as follows: "In what amount, if any, are the Defendants indebted to the Plaintiff? ANSWER = NONE." It is, therefore, considered ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing of the Defendants in this action, and the Plaintiff is taxed with the cost of the Action, i Hoyle Sink ——- Sides Presiding eee eK ee ee he mH IN THE SUPERIOR COUR “7% DV T SECOND WEEK «= NOVEMBER TERM 1951 Thursday, November 254 1951 Wo. 5015 North Carolina. In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1951, Mittie L. Clark, Administratrix of Samel Franklin Clark, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Stanford Lowell Larbreth, Vefendant. I { | | { ‘ This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge presiding, and a jury, at the November, 1951, Ter of Iredell Superior Court and tlie jury having been empaneled and the plaintiff having offered her evidence and rested her case and upon the resting of the case by the plaintiff, the defendant, Stanford Lowell Lambreth, through counsel, having moved the Vourt for judgment as of non-suit and the Court being of the opinion that the notion should be allowed, IT is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the action be, and the same is hereby non-suited and dismissed and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs of the action. This November 15th, 1951. Judge Presiding To the ruling of His Honor and tne signing of the judgment and to the judgment the Plaintiff, in apt time and in open court excepts and gives notice of appeal to tie Supreme Court. Further notice waived. Raintiff ie given sixty days within which to serve cease on appeal and defendant, Lambreth, is given thirty days thereafter to serve counter-case or exceptions. Appeal bond in the amount of $50.00 is ad judged sufficient. H. Hoyle Sink eyeoe = Judge Presid ng x* 3 % mF No. h&82 Minerva W Allison vs Marie Waddell ------~-~~~ Continued No .4942 Rachel Christenburry vs Travis Carpenter ----~~ nu-cece---e Continued No. 498) Travis Carpenter vs MF Crouch, T/A Crouch ain Taxie Co & J O Bradshaw ~~~" | No, 5028 Moldply Corporation vs Home Made Cnatt Co. “---"-"""~ oe idiot oul 1e No. 5029 Mack R, Walker vs Annie Mae Johnson--~-~~ - “ pre No, 5050 J C Grant vs John Henry Parker Se Mo. 5054 Joe I Mills ve W Ross Day & Geo © on OO el sini No. 5058 Mary Lisa Sain BNF v8 Clyde Ray pe 2 or Ray Randleman & Wm. Knight -----~~ -Vontinued No, 5059 Jaunita G Sain ye Clyde Alo, 5060 Billie G Miller v8 Clyde Ray Randleman & Wm Knight ------"~ Continued IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- NOVEMBER TERM, 1951 Thursday, November 15, 1951 “No,5067 WC Johnston & C C Johnston vs W Ross Day, et al --------Continued ‘No.5071 Clarence L Poole BNi vs Ray JameS ------~~ ~~~ nnn nnn ee eee Continued ‘No.5C72 MD Tilley vs Mrs Josie Jordan -------- rr -..-Continued JNo.5081 Lucinda Bellamy vs Alfonzo Stevenson ---~---- ------.Continued No.508 JM Schafer vs John A Miller & wife --------- o--~-.--+ + Continued \ iW i j iNNo.5089 Dixie Plywood Co of Savannah, Inc vs Morrison-Lael Fixture Corp & The Travelers Indemnity Co a corp -----~--~-Continued No.5090 S C Morrison T/A Electrical Supplies vs R R Compton & Grady Loftin T/A Compton Electric lo ------------- -~=»=Continued J : - ; wieddn No. 5113 Mrs Margaret Nicks Admrx vs Mrs Johnnie Jean Howard, Amrx- Continued ‘No.5119 Piedmont Bank & Trust Co vs Steve Talbert et al -------~---Continued No.5139 Mrs F B Bunch T/A Bunch Hatchery of Statesville vs R L Brinson --------: ome - -Cont inued No. 5152 Raymond Creedmore vs Jack Woods -----~--~--~-- reeseeese = Continued 4 eee See RE OD ES OS VNO. 5012 North Garolina, In the Superior vourt, Iredell County. November Term, 1951 Elva Bass | " JUDGMENT Frank Bass | This cause coming on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Superior Court before the undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute this action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing that the plaintiff failed and neglected to appear and prosecute this action: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, a,d the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 13th day of November, 195l. H, Hoyle Sink wo KX KERRKEKKEKKK KH KK KH K we Mo. 5051 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY vy. J. Dolan Company, Inc. Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Austin-Bunen Furniture Company, a Corporation Defendant ee ee OE em This cause coming on to be heard before the Nonorable, b. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell Vounty, upon motion by the plaintifi for judgment against the defendant by default ‘inal; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 23rd day of April, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that said summons togetaer a with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 27th x day of April, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, |} ea or other pleading has ben filed by the defendant and an extension of wer was filed, and that time to file p}eadings has been granted but no ans eS the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; bg And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the causqaet action consists of tae breach of an express contract to } pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Two Hundred ia Twenty ($220.00) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 7th day of Sept- | ember, 1950; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff nave and recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred Twenty f September, 1950, ($220.00) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 7th day © and the costs of this action. This 6th day of November, 1951. ». G, smith Tierk Superior court oeeeoe ee OO x * % Yo. 5036 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Mrs, Bertha Summers, Plaintiff, Vs. VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Alton Crouch and P. M. Grouch, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the matters and things in controversy in this action have been fully and completely settled between the parties, and that the plaintiff desires totake a nonsuit in this action: IT IS, THEHXEFORE, UPON MOTION OF ADAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERRY, 7TORNEYS FOR THE PLAINTIFF, ORDSRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff be, and she is hereby nonsuited and this action dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costto be charged by the Clerk of this vVourt. This the 6th day of November, 1951. UC. G. Smith _ asap Sierk of Superior court of Iredell County, North Carolina. Consented to: ADAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERRY Attorneys for the Plaintiff BY: C. B. Winberry Mrs. Bertha Summers, Mrs. Bertha Summers No. 5037 NORTH CAROLINA, In the ouperior Vourt IREDELL COUNTY. J. P. Summers and Charles Summers, Administrators of the Estate of W. T. Summers, Plaintiffs, VOLUNTARY NONSUIT vs. Alton Crouch and P. M. Urouch, Defendants. 4) This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before tue Honorable ©. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell vounty, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Vourt from the statement of Wa ssenvnavea for the plaintiffs, t! he matter Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiffs, that the mat s and things in controversy in this action nave been fully ana completely settled between the parties, and that the plaintiffs desire to take a nonsuit in this action: MOTTON Of ADAMS, UEARMAN & WINBERRY, ATTORNEYS IT IS, THEREFORE, UPON MOTION Or ADAMS, VEARMAN & WINBERRY, ATTO: FOR THE PLAINTIFFS, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DEURESU that the plaintiffs, oe, vi i this ; j ismissed, and the plaintifis and they are hereby nonsuited and this action d ‘y } y rad Q Cler f this vourte are taxed with the cost to be charged by the vierk 0 This the 6th day of November, 1951. Oa A TR . ccsnieemeniumeene Tierk of superior Court of Iredell County, North Varolina Consented to: ADAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERRY Attorneys for the Plaintiffs BY: CO. Bi em con BY: J. P. Symmers _.._._- —. BY: William ¢. Summers dministrators . 6 ene ae? Ae? Oe VNO. 5153 North Carolina In the Superior Vourt q Iredell Vounty B. J. Powell, Plaintiff JUDGMENT VSe MorrisoneLael Fixture vorporation, Vefendant ee pee A Qn This cause coming on to be heard before the Monoradle vu, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior vourt of lredell County, and it appearing to tne vourt that summons in the above entitled action was issued on the 25th day of September, 1951; that said summons was duly served on the jiefendant on the 27th day of September, 1951, by reading and delivering a a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint to the defendant; Pi, Ss and it further appearing to the Court that on the 25th day of September, os 1951, at the time ot the institution of said action, the plaintiff caused to be filed in said cause a duly verified complaint attached to which is an itemized verified statement of the account sued upon in said cay,se; that the account sued upon in said cause is based upon an entire and indivisible contract under tie terms wiich the defendant agreed to pay to tne plaintiff the sum of Two Hundred, Twenty- two and 15/100 ($222.15) Dollars; that the defendant has paid the plaintiff no part of said sum; and it apvearing to the Court that the amount sued upon is an amount certain according to the terms of an indivisible contract between the plaintiff and the defendant; and it further appearing to the Court from the plaintiff's verified complaint that the plaintiff within the time permitted by statute namely, the 20th day of March, 1951, filed a notice and claim of lien against the property of the defendant situated in the Uity of Statesville, North Carolina, particularly described as follows: All of Lots Nos. Seven (7), Eight (8), Eighty-nine (89] and Ninety (90) of Rayon Park, as aasesd and siaaned by G. C, McGimsey, Surveyor for the Piedmont Engineering Company, as recorded of reco in the office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, Ns Yes in Plat Book 1, page 205, to which reference is hereby made for 4 more complete description of the same. And being the identical land conveyed to Morrison-Lael Fixture Corporation by U. CG, Coddington, Inc., by deed dated March 15, 1946, recorded March 23, 1946, in Deed Book 176, page 348 of Records of Deeds for Iredell County, North Carolina, And it further appearing to the Court that said action to enforce said lien was duly commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County within the time permitted by law, namely, six months from the date of the filing of said lien; and it appearing further to the Court that no answer has been filed by the defendant and no motion made for extendin the time for filing answer and that no extension of time for filing a answer has been granted by the Clerk; and it appearing further to the Court tiat the time for filing answer in said cause expired on the day of October, 1951, and that no answer has been filed in said cause by the defendant; Now, therefore, the plaintifi, through his attorneys, Raymer & Kaymer, having moved for judgment by jefault final for the sum certain sought to be recovered in said itemized verified complaint and the Vlerk to declare said amount a lien upon the property describe! in the cuplaint; It is now, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed: 1. ‘hat the plaintiff nave and recover vi the defeniant, of Two Hundred, Twenty-two and 15/100 (3222.15) Dollars, with interest tiereon from October 1, 1959, until paid. i Be a ae at i the same is hereby declared to be a 2, That said judgment be and Me -* ° ° sone namnlatn? y : saic lien against the property described in the plaintii:'s complaint and that said i 5 from Augu 50, the day upon which the liem against said property dates from August 1, 1950, the day upon which vA : eno . ae : thea indiviSLdD sntra neretofore plaintifi and the defendant entered into the indivisible contract ner referred to. j { this » taxed t he vlerk 3. For the costs of this action to be taxed by ta ° This the 7 day of November, 1951. G. Smith ; es ‘the Superior Court ve Clerk of oene2ee8 8444 #8 wow Kw O% i 5149 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY M & J Finance Vorporation i" Plaintiff i V3. JUDGMENT ‘harles O. Sloop \ a Defendant bs This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable ¥, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issuei in this action on the 28th day of September, And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 28th day of September, 1951; ind it further appearing to the court tnat no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted, and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of One Hundred Fifty & 93/100 (3150.93) Vollare with interest thereon until paid; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the plaintiff claims the right to tne possession of one Admiral Television Model 16212, Serial No. 775727, in order that he may sell the same as provided in a certain chattel mortgage executed by tne defendant and that ancillary to this action the plaintiff caused to be issued claim and delivery papers for said property, and thereunder now has the same in his possession; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred at Fifty & 94/100 ($150.93) Dollars, with interest thereon until paid, that he be declared entitled to the possession of the said property, and he be allowed to sell the sae as sy law provided and credit the anount received therefor, 1235 tie legal costs of sail sale, upon the monetary judgment herein rendered, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the costs of this action. This 9th day of November, 1951. _t. G, Smith _ Clerk of the mperior Court NO. 5148 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY M & J Finance Corporation I Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Uharles 0. Sloop i Defendant { This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable UL, G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 2eth day of September, 1951; And it further appearing to tie court that said summons together with a copy of sdd complaint were served on the defendant on the 28th day of September, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted, and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that ay a the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay Ninety & sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of One Hundred y 10/100 ($190.10) Dollars with interest thereon until paid; a t And it further appearing to the court from the verified complain Hot Point that the plaintiff claims the right to the possession of a erial No. 165-606; in order that he may sell automatic washer Model No. LC3, § in a certain chattel the plaintiff caused mortgage executed by the defendant, the same as provided 4 to be issued claim and and that ancillary to this action a O94 delivery papers for said property, and thereunder now has the same in his possession; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred Ninety & 10/}00 ($190.10) with interest thereon until paid, that he be declared entitled to the possession of the said property, and that he be allowed to sell the same as by law provided and credit the amount received therefor, less the legal costs of said sale, upon the monetary judgment herein rendered, and that the plaintiff recover ¢ the defendant the costs of this action. This 9th day of November, 1951. C, G,Smith cre setcee#tscewvwaeuBus a = eS @ “KK * ‘NO. 5143 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY C. M. Tucker Lumber Corporation I Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Grant Bolmer, T/a Moorcraft Manufacturing Coffpany ! Vefendant j THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the Honorable CU. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon moti on by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 12th day of September, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 14th day of September, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, © other pleading has been filed by the defendant and an extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which plead- ings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of Three Hundred Fourteen & 23/100 ($314.23) Dollars with interest thereon Se, eee eee a cod re aa from the first day of January 1950; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $314.23, with interest thereon from the first day of January, 1950, and the costs af this action. This 9th day of November, 1951. C. G, Smith “Clerk Superior Court Alo. 5165 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Iredell County. Before the Clerk Oneida, Ltd., Successor to Wm. A. Rogers, Ltd., Plaintiff, Vs. Hoyle kL, Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 15th day of November, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman and ; r — , by default final Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by ' and it appearing to the Court: ole 0, 19521, the plaintiff filed a duly verified ’ with the Clerk of the Superior Court That on October l complaint in the above entitled action, of Iredell County. oe That summons was issued from this Court on October 10, 1951, to the / d by law. Sheriff of Iredell County, and was retumable as provided SY -3 Deput That the summons was served on the defendant by R. E. Perkins, Deputy g with the defendant ober 10, 1951, by leavin Sheriff of Iredell County, on Oct together with a copy of the complaint. a copy of the summons, NT mln That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended a and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. ; ie That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized verified statenent, marked "Exhibit A," was attached to, and made a part of the complaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchase, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the transaction. tle “That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A," that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A," the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-Five Dollars Forty-seven Vents ($265.47), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from August 1, 1951, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Hoyle E. Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, the sum of Two Hundred Sixty- five Dollars Forty-seven Cents ($265.47), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from August 1, 1951, until paid. This the 15th day of November, 1951. a CG. G, Smith _ ee Clerk of Superior Vo Iredell County. tek ok tek ke ok ok ok me ke me mk Om wo. 5170 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk The Non-Retailing Company, Plaintiff, = FINAL JUDGMENT Hoyle &. Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, —<—_ Oe Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Gourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 19th day of November, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Vourt: ole That on October 17, 1951, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. -2- That summons was issued from this Court on October 17, 1951, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. = - That the summons was served on the defendant by R. &. Perkins, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on October 18, 1951, by leaving with the defendant a copy of the summons, together with @ copy of the complaint. -ke- That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no s been filed by the defendant. time allowed by law other pleading or motion ha -5- answer, demurrer, G 4 That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands @ sum certain e sold and delivered t pay a certain sum therefor; that an the defendant unbr the con- in money due for merchandis o th ent of the defendant to marked "Exhibit t forth the merchandise purchased, tract and agreem A," was attached to, and made itemized verified statement, a part of the complaint, which statement se ice to be paid therefor, and contained the date of the purchase, and the pr out of the transaction. all debits and credits arising DOF | | ; | : ee ee eh ere ene allie That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A," that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's Statement, marked "Exhibit A," the sum of Four Hundred Seven Dollars Forty-four Cents ($407.44), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 14, 1950, until paid. IT 13, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Hoyle E. Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, the sum of Four Hundred Seven Dollars Forty-four Cents ($407.44), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 14, 1950, until paid, This the 19th day of November, 1951. i te ey Clerk of Superior Court of ~~ Iredell County. INO. 5159 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Thomas & Howard Company of l Hickory, N. C., Incorporated Plaintiff i Vs. " JUDGMENT Zeb Speaks, t/a Speaks' Grocery { Defendant ' This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Hon. Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default fine; And it appearing to the court that a varified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 2&th day of September, 1951, and that said summons was returned on the ath day of October, 1951, marked "after due and diligent search, Zeb Speaks not to be found in Iredell County, North Carolina" signed J. ©. Rumple, sneriff of Iredell County by B. U. Redmond, Deputy; and it further appearing to the court that an alais or pluries summons was filed in this court on the llth day of October, 1951 and that the same was served on the defendant on the 1&th day of October, 1951; and a copy of the plaintiff's complaint was served on the defendant on the 14th day of October, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleadings has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court fron the varified complaint of the plaintiff that a cause of action exists for an unpaid balance on an account under a contract, and that the amount asked for in the complaint is for a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $411.61 with interest thereon from the 16th day of August, 1949 until paid; Now, therefore, it is order, adjudged, and decreed that the plaimtiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of 5411.61, with interest thereon from the 16th day of August, 1949 until paid, and the costs of this action. This the 19th day of November, 1951. U. G. Smith Tlerk of the superior Vourt ee ee No. 5163 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Parnell-Martin Supply Company Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT David A. Harrison, Trading 4s Harrison Electric Company Defendant | THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being he r Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, ard before the Honorable C, G. Smith, Clerk Superio and it appearing that the matters and things involved in the f oregoing o all parties concerned and the cause have been settled satisfactorily t gment of voluntary non-suit entered in this plaintiff desires to have 4 jud matter. adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Now, therefore, it is ordered, ry nonsuit in this cause, and the plaintiff is allowed to take a volunta is taxed for the cost of this action. 1951. ; is so nonsuited and This 19th day of November, pnser Land, Sowers §% AVS’? pai 2 atee Ward Attorneys * ry e 5 ae a abe That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized verified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A," that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's Statement, marked "Exhibit A," the sum of Four Hundred Seven Dollars Forty-four Gents ($407.44), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 14, 1950, until paid. IT I3, THERMVORS, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Hoyle E. Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, the sum of Four Hundred Seven Dollars Forty-four Cents ($407.44), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 14, 1950, until paid, This the 19th day of November, 1951. C. G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court of ~~ Iredell County. INO. 5159 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Thomas & Howard Company of Hickory, N. C., Incorporated Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Zeb Speaks, t/a Speaks’ Grocery eee re Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Hon. Carl G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default fine; And it appearing to the court that a varified complaint was “ er filed and summons issued in this action on the 2&th day of September, 1951, and that said summons was returned on the 8th day of October, 1951, marked "after due and diligent search, Zeb Speaks not to be riff found in Iredell County, North Carolina" signed J. C. Rumple, She i of Iredell County by B. C. Redmond, Deputy; and it further appearing this to the court that an alais or pluries summons was filed in court on the llth day of October, 1951 and that the same was served on the defendant on the 1&th day of October, 1951; and a copy of the plaintiff's complaint was served on the defendant on the 14th day of October, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, @ other pleadings has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the varified complaint of the plaintiff that a cause of action exists for an unpaid balance on an account under a contract, and that the amount asked for in the complaint is for a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $411.61 with interest thereon from the 16th day of August, 1949 until paid; Now, therefore, it is order, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $411.61, with interest thereon from the 16th day of August, 1949 until paid, and the costs of this action. This the 19th day of November, 1951. UG. G. Smith Clerk of the ouperior Court mK OK OK MK KK KO OK OK No. 5163 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Parnell-Martin Supply Company Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT David A. Harrison, Trading as Harrison Electric Company Defendant I I { I | THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing that the matters and things involved in the f oregoing cause have been settled satisfactorily to all parties concerned and the plaintiff desires to have a judgment of voluntary non-suit entered in this matter. Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this cause, and the plaintiff 4s so nonsuited and is taxed for the cost of this action. This 19th day of November, 1951. a 4 owers Clerk Superior Court ppsgnted poi gbands, Ooneys for the Plaintiff. i | | . we That the Court finds from the duly verified conplaint and the itemized verified staterent attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A," that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's Statement, marked "Exhibit A," the sum of Four Hundred Seven Dollars Forty-four Gents ($407.44), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 14, 1950, until paid. [T IS, THSREFORE, ¥ NSIDERED, JXDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Hoyle E. Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, the sum of Four Hundred Seven Dollars Forty-four Cents ($407.44), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from December 14, 1950, until paid, This the 19th day of November, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. INO. 5159 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Thomas & Howard Company of Hickory, N. C., Incorporated Plaintiff i Vs. \ JUDGMENT Zeb Speaks, t/a Speaks' Grocery 4 Defendant ) This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Hon. Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default fine; And it appearing to the court that a varified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action on the 2&th day of September, 1951, and that said summons was returned on the 8th day of October, 1951, marked "after due and diligent search, Zeb Speaks not to be . $f found in Iredell County, North Carolina" signed J. C. Rumple, Shert 5 i of Iredell County by B. C. Redmond, Deputy; and it further appearing to the court that an alais or pluries summons was filed in this court on the llth day of October, 1951 and that the same was served on the defendant on the 18th day of October, 1951; and a copy of the plaintiff's complaint was served on the defendant on the 14th day of October, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, ar other pleadings has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the varified complaint of the plaintiff that a cause of action exists for an unpaid balance on an account under a contract, and that the amount asked for in the complaint is for a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of $411.61 with interest thereon from the 16th day of August, 1949 until paid; Now, therefore, it is order, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of $411.61, with interest thereon from the 16th day of August, 1949 until paid, and the costs of this action, This the 19th day of November, 1951. UG. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court No. 5163 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY ParnelleMartin Supply Company Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT David A. Harrison, Trading as Harrison Electric Company Defendant I I { I | THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing that the matters and things involved in the f oregoing cause have been settled satisfactorily to all parties concerned and the plaintiff desires to have a judgment of voluntary non-suit entered in this matter. Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this cause, and the plaintiff 4s so nonsuited and is taxed for the cost of this action. This 19th day of November, 1951. pis Clerk seer Court gpagnted yo bands, Someys for chk Plaint itt. flo. 5161 NORTH CAROLINA, | IN THE SWPERIOR COURT. ROWAN COUNTY. ! NOVEMBER TERM, 1951, | Norman Wesley Connor | ) vs. i JUDGMENT Mattie Johnson Connor } This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Rowan county, North Carolina, before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Norman Wesley Connor, and the defendant, Mattie Johnson Connor, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the ddfendant. H. Hoyle Sink Judge Presiding A True Copy. This Nov. 26, 1951 Vera Maie Uzzell Deputy C.S.C, (SEAL) flo. 5161 NORTH CAROLINA, | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. ROWAN COUNTY. j NOVEMBER TERM, 1951, Norman Wesley Connor | VS. { JUDGMENT Mattie Johnson Connor ] This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Rowan county, North Carolina, before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Norman Wesley Connor, and the defendant, Mattie Johnson Connor, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the ddfendant. H. Hoyle Sink Judge Presiding A True Copy. This Nov. 26, 1951 Vera Maie Uzzell Deputy C.S.C,. (SEAL) akekhaeene ee RRR KR KE KH flo. 5161 | NORTH CAROLINA, | IN THE SWPERIOR COURT. ROWAN COUNTY. i NOVEMBER TERM, 1951. Norman Wesley Connor | vs. | JUDGMENT i Mattie Johnson Connor } This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Rowan county, North Carolina, before His Honor, H. Hoyle Sink, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff gnd against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Norman Wesley Connor, and the defendant, Mattie Johnson Connor, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the ddfendant. H, Hoyle Sink Judge Presiding “Hep RERANC ST 3 A True Copy. This Nov. 26, 1951 Vera Maie Uzzell Deputy C.S.C. (SEAL) eee ae ee ER RK KK Ke Oe $+ —__——- MO. 5185 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. , Allie B. Duncan Executrix ths J. F. Duncan istate, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Pervie R. Poole and wife, Dorothy E. Poole, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C, G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of Adams, dearman and winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that all matters and things arising between the plaintiff and the defendants in the above entitled action have been fully and completely settled, and the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDER“D, ADVJUDGED AND DECREED, upon the notion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that this action be, and the same is hereby nonsuited and in all respects terminated, and that the plaintiff be taxed with the cost. This the 2lst day of November, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell vounty, North Carolina. Consented to: ADAMS, DEARMAN & WINBERRY, Attomeys for the plaintiff BY: C. B. Winberry hember of Firm a a a ee) ey a oe Se Gecwee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE CIVIL NO. 190 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) VS. DEFAULT JUDGMENT } ) WALTER A. JONES This cause coming on to be heard and being heard upon motion of Thomas A. Uzzell, Jr., United States Attorney, and it appearing to the Court from the record in this cause and the Court so finds tie facts to be: That complaint was filed and summons issued on October 2, 1951, and personally served upon the defendant by the United States Marshal for this District on October 8, 1951; that no answer or other plea has been filed by the defendant and no appearance entered by him or anyone on his behalf; that this action is brought for the reason that the defendant on or about March 21, 1933 executed and delivered a promissory note, payable to the Secretary of Agriculture for the United States of America, payable on or before Uctober 31, 1933, with interest at the rate five and one-half per cent (54%) per annum; the note was thereafter duly endorsed and negotiated as alleged in the complaint; and the amount due thereon is definite and certain; that the time for filing answer has expired and the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, the United States of America, have and recover of the defendant, WALTER A. JONES, the sum of $75.00, together with interest at the rate of five and one-half per cent (54%} per annum from October 31, 1933 until paid, and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. The Clerk of this Court will certify a transcript of this judgment for docketing in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, This 2nd day of November, 1951, /s/ Wilson Warlick United States District Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Western DISTRICT OF North Carolina | Ss: I QO, Le M ° ° cLurd, Clerk of the United States District Court in and for Western D n the e istrict of North Varolina, do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing is a true and ful] copy of the original Default Judgment filed Walter A in Statesville Jones, on Nov. 3, 1951 Civil No. 190- United States of America -¥8" now remaining among the records of the said Court in my offi office, IN te TESTIMONY “NEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed 4 _ 8 thal tia iain name and affixed the seal of the aforesaid Court at mo N. C, this 3rd day of November, A. D. O. L. McLurd Clerk. By Annie Aderholdt Annie Aderholdt, Deputy Clerk. Filed in the office of the Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina on the 27th day of November, 1951. Mo, 5100 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY James L. Miller Plaintiff vs JUDGMENT William R Allison and Edna R. Allison Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable, C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the Plaintiff for Judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the Court that a verified complaint was filed and Summons issued in this action on the 18th day of July, 1951; And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendants on the 19th day of July, 1951; 4nd it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer, or Other pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension of time to file pleading has been granted and that the time in which pleading may be filed has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint that the “ause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay a sum of noney fixed by the contract, namely the sum of Twelve Hundred Seventy Three and 92 /100 dollars with interest thereon from the 28th day of July, 1949; Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff hay 2 * and recover of the defendants the sum of Twelve Hundred and Seventy Three i 92/100 dollars, with interest thereon from the 2th day of July, 1949, and the , : ~ eo eenees ee i ape = - costs of this action. This 27th day of November, 1951. C. G, Smith Clerk of the Superior Court Tre a6 OX < * OK No. 4972 aliiiaiiiiaial NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY Statesville Production Credit j Association Plaintiff | JUDGMENT Vs. | Harry S. Nance ' Defendant | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable ©. G. Smith, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing that the matters and things involved in the foregoing cause have been settled satisfactorily to all parties concerned, the property not having been taken by claim & delivery, and the plaintiff desires to have a judgment of voluntary non-suit entered in this matter Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this cause, and the plaintiff is so nonsuited and is taxed for the cost of this abhi This 30 day of November, 1951, C. G, Smith dian Clerk Superior court, 1redell County Consented to: William I. Ward, Jr. Attorney for tne Plaintiff GRAN 2 ROS qa fo. 5176 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Jacques Kreisler Manufacturing i Corporation, Plaintiff, | me , FINAL JUDGMENT Hoyle E, Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, Defendant. ! This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 30th day of November, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by defa,lt final, and it appearing to the Court: ale That on October 29, 1951, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. a2~ That summons was issued from this Court on October 29, 1951, to the Sheriff of Iredell county, and was returnable as provided by law. -3- That the summons was served on the defendant by Kk. E, Perkins, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on October 30, 1951, by leaving with thedefendant a Copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. a That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant, o5= That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized Verified Statement, marked "Exhibit A," was attached to, and made a part of the “omplaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purchage, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits a rising out of the transaction, -6= That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized ve rified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A," that the ie costs of this action. This 27th day of November, 1951. C. G. Smith erk of the Superior Court — No « 4972 NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Statesville Production Credit j Association Plaintiff JUDGMENT Vs. | Harry S. Nance i Defendant { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable C. G. Smith, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing that the matters and things involved in the foregoing cause have been settled satisfactorily to all parties concerned, the property not having been taken by claim & delivery, and the plaintiff desires to have a judgment of voluntary non-suit entered in this matter Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff is allowed to take a voluntary nonsuit in this cause, and the plaintiff is so nonsuited and is taxed for the cost of this action, This 30 day of November, 1951, C, G. omith Clerk Superior Court, 1rede.l County Consgented to: William I. Wari, Jr, Attorney for tne Plaintiff x iB i Qo 0. 5176 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Jacques Kreisl er Manufacturing Corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT Hoyle E. Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, { Defendant. { This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 30th day of November, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by defa,lt final, and it appearing to the Court: -le That on October 29, 1951, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. =2= That summons was issued from this Court on October 29, 1951, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. -3- That the summons was served on the defendant by &. E. Perkins, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on October 30, 1951, by leaving with thedefendant a Copy of the summons, together with a copy of the complaint. oh= That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. -5- That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain in money due for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement of the defendant to pay a certain sum therefor; that an itemized verified Statement, marked "Exhibit A," was attached to, and made a part of the “omplaint, which statement set forth the merchandise purchased, the date of the purthage, and the price to be paid therefor, and contained all debits and credits a Tising out of the transaction, -6- That the Court finds from the duly verified complaint and the itemized ve Tified statement attached to the complaint, and marked "Exhibit A," that the defendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery of the merchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A," the sum of Four Hundred Highty-three Dollars Thirty-eight Cents (#483.38), together with intherest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from September 19, 1951, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Hoyle &, Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, the sum of Four Hundred Lighty-three Dollars Thirty-eight Cents ($483.38), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from September 19, 1951, until paid. This the 30th day of November, 1951. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superior court of Iredéll County. JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA INo. 4683 Mrs. Nova B. Fowler Fall Term, 1951 | vs. | | Atlantic Co., Inc, trading locally as the No. 38 } . Iredell Ice & Fuel Co., Inc. 362 Iredell County This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of Opinion that there is error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Vourt. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable Jeff. D. Johnson, Jr., Justice, be , e9 certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the JUDGMENT IS REVERSED And it 48 considered and adjudged further, that the Defendant do pay the costs of the appeet in this Court incurred, to wit, the sum of Fifty-two and 15/100 Dollars ($52.15), and execution issue therefor, A TRUE Copy Adrian J, Newton vierk of the Supreme Court. Filed in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court, Ir ’ edell County, North ona" on the 4th day of December, 1951, eR ER He He x 6 fo. 4679 JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA A Rochlin | FALL TERM, 1951 No. 380 Iredell County. VS. pP, S. West Construction Co., Inc. This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereot, this vourt is of opinion that there is error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Court. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the vourt here that the opinion of the Court, as delivered by the Honorable Emery 3. Venny Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the case is remanded for causes indicated in said opinion. And it is considered and adjudged further, that the Defendant do pay the costs of the appeal in this Vourt incurred, to wit, the sum of ihirty-four and 65/100 dollars ($34.65), and execution issue therefor. A TRUE COPY Adrian J. Newton Clerk of the Supreme Court. Filed in the office of the Clerk of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Varolina, on the 4th day of December, 1951. C. G. Smith Ve Ve Ve Mos, 1519 & 1520 JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA State FALL TeRM, 1951 vs juther "Luke" Kimmer and Will Mathis, alias Iredell County. Wil) Mathews. No. 362 This cause came on to be argued upon the transcript of the record from the Superior Court Iredell County: Upon consideration whereof, this Court is of Opinion that there is error in the record and proceedings of said Superior Vourt. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court here that the opinion of ‘he Gourt,, as delivered by the Honorable W. A. Devin, Chief Justice, be certified to the said Superior Court, to the intent that the A NEW TRIAL is awarded And it 18 considered and adjudged further, that the County do pay the costs af the “ppeal in this Court incurred, to wit, the sum of Twelve and 83/100 dollars $12.83), A TRUE COPY Adrian J, Newt ourt. Ulerk of theoupreme $a: B0b. bs 195, 24 in the office of the C. 3. C. of Iredell County, North Carolina, C,..6. Sas C.5,C an d execution issue therefor. No. 5177 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY. Elgin National Watch Company, Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT Hoye E. Setzer, trading apd doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, = Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this 5th day of December, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the VCourt: ale That on November 1, 1951, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court otf Iredell County, ate That summons was issued from this Vourt on November 1, 1951, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. -3< That the summons was served on the defendant by kK. kL. Perkins, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, on November 2, 1951, by leaving with the defendant a copy of the summons, together with a copy or the complaint, oe That the time for ti Pend ior the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant ; , efendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or moti + : “a ’ pieading or motion has been riled by the defendant. -5< That the plaintiff exhibited the six promissory notes sued on in this action to the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the Court ~ ’ - ) . finds that the total principal sum due on the six notes is Seven Hundred Twenty- fi Dollars , ve ars Twelve Cents ($725.12), together with interest at the rate of six per cent per ann : p inum as follows: On the sum of 9136.00 from April 15, 1951, until paid; on the sum of $136, #136.00 from Nay 15, 1951, until paid; on the sum of $117.12 from June 15, 1951 . : : : » until paid; on the sum of w112,00 from July 15, 1951, until paid; on the sum of j112,00 ¢ Aug v 0 from August 15, 1951, until paid; and on the sum of $112.00 from September 15, 1951, until paid =6— That the six not °S sued on in this action and exhibited to the Court have be@ narked that judgment has been obtained thereon and the same attached to this judgment . IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Hoyle E. Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer'ts Jewelry, the sum of Seven Hundred Twenty-five Dollars Twelve Cents (3725.12), to- gether with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum as follows: On the sum of $136.00 from April 15, 1951, until paid; on the sum of $136.00 from May 15, 1951, until paid; on the sum of $117.12 from June 15, 1951, until paid; on the sum of $112.00 from July 15, 1951, until paidg on the sum of $112.00 from August 15, 1951, until paid; and on the sum of $112.00 from September 15, 1951, until paid; together with the cost of this action taxed by the Court, This the 5th day of December, 1951. LU, G, Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, No, 5158 North Carolina | In the Superior Court, Iredell County | Before the Vlerk. Statesville Gin Company, Plaintiff, vs W. C, Gryder, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Ulerk of the Superior vourt of Iredell County on this the 6th day of December, 1951, on motion of Scott and Gollier, attorneys, for judgment by default final. It ap; Caring to the Court that the action was institued in this Vourt on Septenber 28th, 1951, to recover upon an account for goods sold and delivered by the Plaintiff to the defendant. It further appears to the Court that in the action based on the account there is due on Said account the sum of Two Hundred Forty Turee and 29/100 ($243.29) Vol : P ; ' lars, with interest at 6% from January 22, 1951, until paid; that complaint was Served on the defendant October lst, 1951, who, upon his motion, was allowed until tae 19th day of November, 1951, by order of the Clerk of Superior Vourt, bus Saas “efendant has failed to answer or otherwise plead in the cause, and it further appears *0 the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment by default final against tne defendant, It is, recover of the therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff i) | : i" defendant, W. C. Gryder, the sum of Two Hundred Forty Three and 29/100 ($243.29) a , of ‘ AN Jollars, with interest from January 22, 1951, at tne rate ol 6% until paid, A Dee | ‘ A together with the costs of this action. ) C. G, Smith = “Ulerk Superior Court, ¥} Ay an o + = No. 5178 | i NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT i IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK = y | A Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, | Plaintiff. { =~ § | . a Ed Oliver and E. S,. Johnson . Defendants. 4 in | This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable L i C, G, Smith, Clerk of Superior Vourt, Iredell Vounty, North Carolina, and it 4 i appearing to the court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiff that » the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties and Mv. that the plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action; ee It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff aS Tee be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk. a. \ This 6 day of December, 1951, an , C, G,. Smith ; Clerk of Superior Court D ma Consented to: z= ane Scott & Vollier : By _M. L, Nash oe Attorneys for the plaintiff, ed i‘ if « « _— 4 wae win i sealsdadea ic 19S het os ee ee ee Jat Ss URS RAN ee ee » 5174 oe CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CLERK c, E. Fraley and James Fraley, as Freley's Food Stores eisai ’ Plaintiffs : -vs- JUDGMENT Jonah Wilson, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable C, G, Smith, Ulerk of Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the court from the statement of the attorneys for the plaintiffs that the matters and thins in contwyersy have been settled between the parties and that the plaintiffs have elected to take a nonsuit in their action; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiffs be nonsuited and be taxed with the costs to be charged by the vlerk. This 6 day of December, 1951. Uv. G,. Smith Clerk of Superior Vourt CVonsented to: SCOTT & COLLIER By Mh, L. Nash Attorneys for the Plaintiffs. Ms 7 a a ae ee ee A t 4 a Ta AOe Montel Gos AS a (OCD WAT UI Ape ro. : \ om LL Se A ! 4 i | es ee. "4 eee /yo. 5179 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Vourt TREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk The Gruen Watch Company, Plajntiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT Hoyle E, Setzer, trading and doing business as Setzer's Jewelry, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this llth day of December, 1951, on motion of Adams, Dearman ana Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the court: ole That on November 6, 1951, the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the above entitled action, with the vlerk of tne Superior vourt of Iredell County, That summons was issued from this Court on November 6, 1951, to the Sheriff and was returnable as provided by law. That the summons Perkins, Deputy “2 @ + , y= Sheriff of Iredell Vounty 1 s : - “ee , by leaving with the defendant a Copy of the summons, together with a niplaint MVic . Lime lor the defendant to answer was not extended, ami tae time allowed by for the defend . € deiencant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading or motion has tiled by the defendant “Vy Vile Gelendant. a5 That the verifi ‘as wa : verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands a sum certain 28 money due for merchandise sold ana delivered to the defendant under the contract and agreement ot the defendar sara , sndant to pay @ certain sum therefor; that an itemized yerified statement, marked "Exhib3 : ’ ACL BXnNLG iu ae i ; 161it ; , was attacned to and made - o = 1 int » and made a part of the compia ’ which statement set forth +} 1 eee forth the merchandi C nie né is haeaA - se purchased, the date of the purcnase, and the price to be paid t e paid tuerefor, and contained all debits and credits arising out of the transaction, = a6 ‘nat the Court finds i ror f so n the duly verified complaint and the itemized erified statement attached to the ; p . complaint, and marked "Exhibit A", that the & Sic tai i. iar Ro cali BEA ab fendant is now due the plaintiff, on account of the sale and delivery oft tne defe erchandise shown in the plaintiff's statement, marked "Exhibit A", the sum of m Hundred Dollars (3900.00), together with interest thereon av the rate a@ six Nine per cent per annum from March 30, 1951, until paid. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, AD JUDGED ND DECREED that the intiff recover of the defendant, Hoyle &. setzer, trading ana doing busi ness pla as setzer's Jewelry, the sum of Nine Hundred Dollars (3900.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum irom larch 30, 1951, until i } 4th ti S a j j xed by the vourt. paid, togetner with the cost ol this action taxe J , 4 , +" a 5 This the llth day of December, 1951. Iredell vounty. hio, 5190A NORTH CAROLINA a. se ueeenel TREDELL COUNTY In the Matter of the Vare and Justody of Gary Wayne Newton and Patsy christine \ewton, both Infants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Judge J. ©, Rudisill, in chambers in Newton, Soren carolina, October 13, 1951, on affidavits and oral testimony of tne Applicant an Respondents, and after Causing an investigation to be made, infds as a tact: That the best interests of the minor Children, Gary wayne Newton and Patsy Christine Newton will be best served by their beins entrusted to the care and custody with the Respondents, r. and irs. J. F. Newton, the paternal grandparents f the ant Te - hare : t] they ¢ fi of the said minor children and are persons of good character; that they are 1it and proper persons to have custody oi tne said children and that their home is a Proper and fit place to rear them and th it will be to the best interest of said at be placed in said home. T . as ac t ¢ ard ecustod it herefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the care and custody tr : “AG Said minor ch!) . ; ' ay aj ‘ne I be and is chkldren, Gary “ayne Newton and Patsy Vhristine Newton, de an her : ss ’ 2 ee anes .te — ; eby awarded and entrusted to Mr. and irs. J. F. lewton, ane this cause 45 ret ij } ~ ~ “a sined for the further orders of the vourt. this the lst day of November, 1951. J. C. Kudisill Resident Judge oO? Judicial District of the loth Ne Ce 2 Acerca nese 14 AIO. 5180 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IRSVELL COUNTY S. Parker Hardware Mfg. Corp. Plaintiff ( Vs. JUDGHENT Morrison-Lael Fixture vorp. Defendant. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the Honorable UC. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment against the defendant by default final; And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and summons issued in this action of the 6th day of November, 1951; wo And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 12th day of November, 1951; And it further appearins to the court that no answer, demurrer, or other pleading sas been riled by the defendant and no extension ot time to file pleadings has been granted and that the time within which pleadings may be filed has expired; And it further appearinse to the court from the verified complaint that the cause of action consists ot the oreac.. Of an express contract to pay a sum of money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum of lwo Hundred Thirty & 88/100 (.)230,.€8 ] Irs 3 t} ; rest > 20n 7 r 2 F ) Jollars with interest thereon from the 23rd day of January, 1951; N W theref 4 ia Oe il ‘ — . . : : 2 ow, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff have and recover of the def the sue af & ; — roe She defendant the sum of 3230.68, with interest thereon from he 23rd day ot January anA ¢h ae the 23r A} i danuary, 1951, ana tne costs of this action, This l4th day of Jecember, 1951, so AF Dies oh eae BS Re ile RS iat cto cle + 8 aay are ts sis Baio. obese Ls L ho » 5167 a NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Attrie (Mrs . W e C . ) Wooten ? Plaintiff, t Vs. JUDGNENT Kenneth 0, Wooten, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being neard before the Vlerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North varolina, and it appearing to the Clerk that this action was instituted by the Plaintiff in the scyperior Court of Yadkin County, North Carolina on July 26, 1951; that thereafter the vlerk of the Superior vourt of Yadkin Vounty, orth Carolina, on veptember 12, 1951, entered an Order removing the action to the superior vourt of Iredell vounty, North Carolina; that in apt time an Answer was filed by tne Jefendant; that it now appearing from the statement of counsel for both parties that a compromise has been reached and that all issues arising upon tne Pleadings between tne parties nave been determined and settled, and that the consideration for the settlement nas been fully paid; that the Plaintiff now desires to take a voluntary Non-suit with the costs to be taxed against the Defendant. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGLD, AND DSCRELD that the Plaintiff be and is hereby permitted to take a voluntary Non-suit, and which is consented to by the Defendant; that the costs oi the action be taxed against the Defendant. Signed and entered in Statesville, Iredell Vounty, North varolina, on December 14, 1951, CC. G. Smith Clerk of superior Court of Iredell County. vonsented to: Allen C, Henderson Attorneys for the Plaintil?. Feots._Dearman & Winberry tomeys for the vefendant. eK OK OK RK ROK KK em em H —— = —_— iene a as Alo. 5166 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Lola Fay Brown, Plaintiff, i Vs. JUDGNENT Kenneth C,. Wooten, Defendant. , This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Varolina, and it appearing to the Clerk that this action was instituted by the Plaintiff in the Syrrior Vourt of Yadkin County, North varolina on July 28, 1951; that thereafter the Clerk ot the Superior Vourt of Yadkin County, North Varolina, on September 12, 1951, entered an Urder removing the action to the suverior Vourt of Iredell vounty, North varolina; that in apt time an Answer was filed by the Defendant; that it now appearing from the statement of counsel for both parties that a compromise has been reached and that all issues arising upon the Pleadings between the parties have been determined and settled; and that the consideration for the settlement has been fully paid; that the Plaintiff how desires to take a vojuntary Non-suit with the costs to be taxed against the Vefendant. mm , , AU OU ly WU i | Mo ) a? Be } hn+ ~ Dp 3 ; Ii Is, . y Vi batiod 9 MWIUIGED, ANY JECRESD that the Plaintiff be ; , hou o [+ + + . and is hereby permitted to take a voluntary jion-suit, and which is consented to by the Jefendant; that the costs ot the action be taxed against the defendant. Signed alid entered in otatesville, Iredell County, North Varolina, on Jecember 14, 1951, ‘ UC. G, Smith ae vlerk of Superior court of Iredell county, Vonsented to: Allen UL, Henderson Attorneys for the Plaintitr. Adams , Dearman & winberry Attomeys for tre Vefendant, BSS » . > Bd: 10) No, 5067 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY w. C. JOHNSTON AND C. C. JOHNSTON, Plaintiffs VS. W. ROSS DAY, GZORGE H. SMITH, FRED W. HUDSON, AND ROBERT W. ADKINS, JUVGMiNT GF? VOLUNTARY NONSUIT Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard on motion of William R, Pope and Z. V. Turlington, Attorneys for the Plaintiffs and being heard before the Honorable C, G. Smith, vlerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the court that each of the above named defendants have contributed the sum of 3340.93 as a full and complete settlement of the matters in controversy. t is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that a judgment of Voluntary Nonsuit be and is hereby entered in the above entitled action. This 19 day of Vecember, 1951. Caco e G. Smith G. omith, Clerk Superior Court — ne State of North Carvlina Department of Archives and Historp Raleigh CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY This is to certify that the microphotographs appearing on this reel are true and accurate reproductions of the records listed on the target (title) sheet preceding each volume or series of records microfilmed hereon; that the records were microfilmed on the date and at the reduc- tion ratio indicated; and that on the date of microfilming, the records were in the custody of the official or other individual listed on the target sheet(s). It is further certified that the records listed on the aforesaid target sheet(s) were microfilmed in conformity with the provisions of Sections 845.1 = 845.4, General Statutes of North Carolina; and that in order to insure archival quality and authentic reproduction of records filmed, they were microfilmed in the manner prescribed,and with equipment and film approved, by the State Department of Archives and History. ——_ - ow? (Signed) AL Metts Camera Operator