The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1947-1949 Mirrofilmed by North Carolina Bepartment of Archives and History Division of Archives and Manuscripts Kaleigh, North Carolina 7 * 5 ' “at so uepeililine: Rs ¥ ‘ fg al o ‘ z 94 if ee " ae ‘ re re Pe ae rita oe -* ; ‘ | yy ee Cs ae 7. ae 4 a ; ’ i x or : ai ne i ; ; ‘ i be N ona See wou Se may OAN DOCKET Ss Ge Oo a ~ YEARS 1947 1950 ig tT ee. ae De Be Ne oe RED RATIO 16 { ET Se “, es a | a | If I a 30, 3 4} 17H LI (ef 2471, FAC, wag XG Des VAL IA Hy, 4F OS §4) _ eile xae ig. oatec a. yF4 Mnky, HM x. ho laalalin, G isfs bere) Ki B2G, 5277 lucliAn fe +r late $EF om ere 46 LO Boa , OO fhew 16 10/2 (ball, Hingh, Qu 2 | rdur, Sow 2} plc? oheFD 22 -ft 5, ra — 92 tI, [5/ Bradalna, Aly? 25. 25 a6 Sager C C6: shel £0 Sa Vv jika- fo es Ce 77). A- FS -£6 v hhento/ ae EP . Fb Sprtern, aAanw F. (17 Bole, &. b. (IN L438, 243 FAS, 2/476, 520 OD UW. Kha, hs Gr — 1/2 irri, Aang d a) ya Ik. 4. “Ay bo), blak 1g@7LOP 4 Ff fF Clad Ke, tlhe Yarrt’ (es Wau, Store 77). (fF 7 P Wy , : 2 \Mhtiiye , Wetarr ©. = ee eh. Omg é 233 Nile, KA oe . > as - pn ate 2943265 4a) 410, 6 20 awe . SF « 2 4 Ja & bid al F Morne. Ms A ee _- 2 54) 27)/ Mage , de 0 A 255 nay, hitk & ADH 5 WAZL Sewer, (hp elipr So ay Buco, jatrr~y _ afd Cibo 7 5 30 Rev re. Kills 07 ; 9 ely 1 FOR BD , 347 | qe CL | aa A 3 at nh. Ya fcr af 3943 | 40 eet Hones ttt | r ! 1 Cin, af | Skle~ yom Wh Cor: D 44,3523 FO Lorine, S, FoF ua. 77 J67, £O/ Sryert, Anbiw 3F,2 Bre aos a. yp SL BET Sra they (t.¥. 443,- > Bri, yr Cone LAG Gobi» Gerri 6 #24991 pee sn, # e713 | 1B n , COOUE 475, 49° | Ah Cenk 0. of 17 Baot, Dorett, et {OS AIF oo leg, 7 ny ple 16 sna. nly 227 Mie ort ( Chifjperd/ Y22 Qigrtlbr, CMs. 6. $22 5797 M72 Cuery, Saki PAL SIAL, S56 7 Bbivtne: Hen F, 52] A pramemrtmer— hy Chews Kee. adh, DS raw a Nee Lee YU, <7 2 Barnet, Jerri wo Bu7F Arne ee Mean SF S¥x ie one AY (<4 tf / KO tr |S Gg wy. Lente a 4. de 267 nrdctuy- WT if 2 /OL Dn adhusr, Oy ar 5 1 7 | eget WA-Ge- PF | + Myuecrpahy, /6 | Cerrbsa & /‘] +Vb_yy nike, ad I. 26,27 ort Carrplel / 1). 36,137 gn Cpr GaridemlI4f 51 CbrLimeedd re ee Code i (ere, 4b. Le ee od | | ted ute Co _ 60 Cw ie teen. T/-02-73.94-GG 56 ~ Curt, YA: 77 78.99 ‘ ey an ws, Gd Chil, | a Qe yp 3 4 ambi, surge / | JI J /7 -}/ y han Ai Mteagah) ‘ff fit ta/ 4. //7 L), Naae Zi J PA (pil, 7) /4/ Po fe Aut of. 9. 9) 5 Y 72274236 237,35] 4b] so] sod ty Caligee Cha 1/67 -ts— VF. IP°EI2Z12 Ly gig | M : oo i. Cr . JE 9 rw! Daher a. | ws rentals WW beget Ate) LF 2 AZO ied, he aah | 243,744 LtEhke, i -. 272) lrgren, Wyle ile 42,3 9, Oe, Wage 424, 470 Op rt wae ites kee) fae ae a 3 A bie dep, Fon eee Je Msi PID ZA stb | 23 tt: Wn re L/, YY 566 Fi eh cs, Bldrge ku al, Chas, Bethe) €. S49 Chete, ON prrdd nh IJ O Chol, 2d $52, Chik, Ard DH AS CAm oe , Addi. s70C Orner, TRO 5 70 ¢. Complil tunky Sen SPF Cc ~ Yigchon heey (Ot) BVG-A 76 Yamcars-9. al Apu ci stad 50d G3, 2/5 ae aac Cy sil, oa 4G, 351 ioe Letege Py 63_6¥ eet 7 74995 | £6244, Say bani, ‘be “07 3627 Nhe, 7 ¢ Za y = 4y On yetdr- Babe At7 33 6, HAR Poaudabr yg 247) 326, oa AOglta , AM 353 7 3 fi F Mp? / Ly , : JOD y v y o 2, f ae kv Ce alot a hie as 5 27, Jol q ry ,, y Leaoer Di 29337 f Be Poli) June sales | 4 Getis X Lees Po2dchy 360 mye le Abe 77 Uy i 2- B77 fA. BT IF 2% wet, SOF 2, mitts) Aecey SS, of> 0% Ley. (#P Y aral S360 s5SF6 dF, S&S + + F ssiaiiieaiiane Sep ertinreren - —_— | SITLL GPP 2240-3244, | ae — A2Ve A Savtpa (Koly A. 5¢ | ee Kyle Ae F3. Genk, a C ' et J Sor. Jerre! YU: ard Fee Lintlacrrdh 7. Ate, And 72 7 Sul, [tery snk FH NF 4I Harmer, nan DIA 353 Seypme, Iu o. 72> a L Ge y Yai, 474 | eaii, Gur IS $92 4 ar 4 2 SIL 4 : $2A. a. SH. 25 F2LYOG sa6 4 4 i j ee Se ee eee a SS a - ore 2a 2 - ile eee Ares i a Poa. Oe ee Sg = 5 . rs deal Se: cee oe A714 wees Gan IVE AF o 7. Sedan Se 35 A hid “ tader, TF ite GC. isfl Ff shiaees 2 Bf i. OP yma ic wie re Lig. 3 a Gaba, iin UT, 242,247 beffer - A | 277,243 Capeck ia. jaa. tal, wu. hirretcr 2 $5 7, -a7 4 lay » qhalee | $27,527 -¥9¥ Gillet Co. 37/ hun, ft. * if | hil, 8. Gf 406 kiekgcr, A.A. etal YI ra, Mata 474, BR RS WWVALAY Lethe Xow Leet a2¢ Aha? Bit A. $23) Fa- npg, Geana DAZ 4 Kea 47), 361 \S61 a Poh f*- S746 itil, Levey S706 b Gla / Leale, GF /. t 4-27, 950 577m yy) HAT y oh poy rth riders Brew oe Medic, Dowel yy Pla: 7 #: Kes Lickin WwW, £72 SO} S/d 16 Th WL IER A46, 3. 9 24 | 2-7 | KA, 3 72.| (27 L2I. ya uttD 4. [A 7 thea sine, Mag w/, ee Pact frniy C/ )E5 SET fs L242: A449 2 05) 20¢ ay Y, 345 A hon mn,w 3A ‘] Lannw r+ f y ax 6 Ha Vid, ALI) La ¥ 254, HID mri BH. A56.257 Nir yell, JV) 2 A < 73 taypel) Welt G 297 a. om. BIL ; K LS” rs - 3 / ly ee peti Urks 270 £2 ..78 wif 2. AA J A ol5| BASDA FP. 7-10 c"A va iso Pen ; | mt rt ie 4 Ry ‘ ee me 4, aD ‘ eee | 3 my ' , oF LE ' — i aa =. J. en — tee SS SS LES si as ae “ { i : } ¥ 0 er a ea e % é ana jabknoer, Carerce f- Gr ge | Qyhraeen » Waser fr ie, de SC a a it ] yy Yiiig, , yihr W. 4 t ’ 64 fe ede rv , Ale. 7 : he of MIMS C/-L4 by Mf tw Tis fm Wrtlar-, 3b. atten Yaproe~,~.A_etcl 4of Gaknaa~, Fae Yipned~ 3 rece Yaris’, Jaga - (a SoL* Vigr CZ. Le , DeXnce-s 1 Gar (Mp rnZtir~ OL e S Sp 65! ee SA LLP 9-704 115, FFP, 272, et Wl 1 $s 6g lias 1/79 LPF. 243, 24f Jaf 277 OF] |, $92, 1A hs MP8, IO £34) 241, a3 > HJ 5294 25N 421, xP Su 3471 340 HRI, FAO bay he ata $9 FOF 176 56F (ca tu) | ore (r ns as Rf . iene BERS 4 } a fend , Corky V3 > | aay” i. is ) /2) 47, Hop lon 390) 4, BLY P4333 tS Ye ° ences SIS, 47 wr a S73 ee 4, S24 356 ee A °C SOY “7 Lai 4 IP, A45., JAY 10) NL fim 59 2424.25 yo) = za ir LAF >-5 4 § yp A 2 Hed), 425 4 L 90 113 /31 WG AS x ee, f< edhe) j Are ne / ; dychhy Jd | Py. . Seemed Vy (” oe 4 ——— § ‘ \ oy | a, f 3 a, * Teg H ¢ 7 oo Q maul “pt ti — _ i) 4 " a. Pt _ “a ; + | a ¢ a Se nts - , ty | oe a ee rer ee bet ao Fe oa ES oe say aa reat Pity ' 4 Ye Beek be ° i & 7 a i Bixsg b jj, allay, Catheter we H, £4) 2 4 Dtachanrv, Jarret 49 oe OE ts. yl haa. AF2 Y24, To Gb? 4. aad, all .. 19 a died 22,4 hana’, > ome 7. 133 ia ara Wamar x. x y./ Maundy 2 e 4 Le? oe Chet shaw ist My .o | Kaper? Carp) 5D ~5Y B Naka, haw ww. belle 2 * Tedd fl, AZ. kD iy 7\¢ i Le Manritar), Ys A: fof] i. wT Kot S, (7 x Lhe ony , hen plo ‘ty VTA id , Laine M1 —/7 O im Noa, hr 2, IVA a rons Caer “ [17 [eddecl, Agke O- (2°74 TV 424 GP “ Z LS i ; Noll ) Aefker /s/ % § nkes,Lozerceee A, 154 - NakRte . Tamw GY r etd & uly X 171-\ Gee BULAN NG WY bore V/04 YF | (Nell, G th hy tae. 2/9.,.28f/4 Mahle, —— et 236 Miller ; AC ee 2G] DID FOF Than g.® 305 a .C . 305 * oma by BIG 4 wnt, fe + -@ sa J/F ! Wade. acd | et al 3.22 4 FOAL, As KA A. LDA 7 | i ay ub Ay J, i | | SAS | Nl | ——4 Mie at Q. Ws 354,35) | | Ue J Co _ tw 360) | / eos | i” Qut,/ | | | Wsokuur ¢hy : A » | HE Cer rag , : ae 4 - ¢ Pin ay Hebe “ (70 7? aie, of oie a 24 IL ‘T - | ANr8w”, ‘Cle hilar’ i 2 4 Vf leeear poke 5 2¢ 77 jaadky , jp u) Fe) Melle , oe aL y 4 4 — ¢6 PIAA“ V(Ouettee oe 7) on Zcaee s reo ve he = [ > 1S ye? | )4Q. 166 26 7 52H 33 ¢ LY, , Z bead, aad In nel iihhiarck’ 350 nllank hele’. 442 © gellar), Wirtha (KF ¥35-¢. Ine hacw wal. ~~. 436,470 Y97 in‘ lb, yeh DS SI, 996, "9S, £2) m Hey: ~~ A p97 has Sd. ba iw ui eH ‘ a & | d t = SLF ‘ oa - : & | the } * Uy S > . < Sf ‘a rl S fe Ms S S SY an Tee % zs - ee Mark, Jere S24 IL 4. Bre Basin sah. fee HILAIT MW aneur, CtutlenrX! SLg : mM rake” rele? S We 496, 7 Phi 92 / PY la : yak — 5 2f M oe jee A tha 17 )aaarg , ppt u) a ae | me lp PE S 494 F *nclie- , Qherps fo ~—* A | Wte~, Dd 597 Fajhie, ,piouetiles ~%, Eee ie hd N SS \ = > . ie Be 8 S- re se yey se TED, \ ‘ é 7p ornrac y rw Ae a 7 Uh ee ee ee Ps a oo pe ee | } 4 +, } ; ? H he 1 oo co mee » 4 yeep oo > -tk-p a ee 7 j r ’ : —d e | Pa ‘ 7 eee & 514 Nye SB: oo 1.0, aa att 224) ¥20 | ow / 142, 3 pO Ga Nichkaboa driv ¥ 7 heh wrk, PA FAH 480 weg 53 nlp Bee Tepe at Ye Nag. Cnreler a) Leave Cer YOR | fy i | ae aE ad oe > - " ep ase Rrra (Satreo 4 J ‘4 Wa ues a 4 Lurtra/ vi) Mawr: 4 a, as } : : : (al iad Org L / (Lh key uAw & ) 4 (¥ Dyker, DV tore & /' / } ‘ Vllid , Pane Vf, _ j J ‘ } ‘ , 4 upp vo dnr<¢¢l no -4 | ) Zo, ’ ¢ Jlek Chk Aik ai pf , a LAM Ele aa ra oe f flotsnr CAsLOr.0LA bor { - te ep — (Mer baraer os “ya hel fh 7), ‘/ /| b/s o-, oS. WRX -ML Sh 3 Thy yj ’ Lf of 1? 7 M3470, § 20 L7d., ASD TF be pd’ | YY. 476 5) ) ry (fl 14 144.20 4 bY fe rT = [aves —---— ————————_ a annem ine Sue gee “\ ~ ‘i + f i | + f get al 7 = yea) py ape’ Marvkg / id —) oe. /§ All /f3, 2423 2 pe }). ad,| #27 AZ-12 45 ipo . 3 7 | a: Vp the ) GV Sack, YG. /75_,/94 * 4 Pima, CP 2/5 4 Pept , Aar Lin 23 A Ee 4 rrp AAiprltnod _ a25 56 nner, Pranivlld of. 393,593 Kure, & Vv. 3/7 CMhiss-r Ag see 2) € 2f ot fain © 415 rf. Ata? A Yl 7 a a! = Cipbtreg-, Matha~ 423, ¥26,47I_ SF 2° Pause Stain te a, SHO AV b YTLIA 52) Se. Ae-lre/At Wtlzer, lyre (wale S+ fo FILFA 3 $22,565 (Dees as Afb - a2), ALL »A2P, ILD Ses beer» IL f. , +P, FAILSAA oo us Alig ae S7f oe Oke, W20 hie py W 475, Jel Sra . (Piece S ie i age: Use BD 2 O/ She Viliprawy gar onl Q GAIL 32S wrth £93 Gae oa wm, dieV las GE ee . Fas 7 or : CO A ee am le a ant i : iM \ i 1; ' | ii } f ; ft ; i ‘ - i hy Toe gamma rector ponerse ers a 2 = — - u = : “2 hie ia OE ORO OE : = Sen ree eee ae a eae arepieieeerenememeinab eines repteeerean a 7 ee - < a io es ios UCR ei: Ti saecemertaseti so ssise iS hel BT Olen eal poe a a Eee 7 ne “4 } - - n-ne . * a ee tn > ec ee ee ee ed esy) cs GED ad teed ead > Ra a a Fe) Ft by ae “oaphe¥ ; _ aa Ul < Mi Oi on “aS eee oe i--2 > Fi aa Ct a \ Ne eT Pei To Fee ones a ll > Jy ell, geerencnm 7 , OAs t , 7 | re. Bi i 4 i i pened: e487) / oF 4nd iF 142 $/ AF EUS. 9 DO Fi. Wi IEF, 2b, 3.25 eg | UES, cms (KALA, 7°: 120 Ryle. Ueki” at Nock "9 beg /Fo. /IR bz 222 W, te ae. weg Ae A ar ‘ 5 = a C Awcthe a7) / 94 Lo53 Nonege UV) Rrer .. 455, 304 ~ 3/0 Aermmty / MOV La? BP. oft >.F"7 Shaan, Kakph H sad Leck ‘ 5 ke ‘ts 7, yeh, Mein Ke FHS, 943 Med, Nre .\ Fear € <b : . -Arank €. 374,375 tyck . Keolrt KA2 SFRC YER Agni « Be, #2247 5 2) Nidmrrar) Cyniad § 63, #78 5 2| Aa2e, ee A.¢ 45/2 JAhwn32, OtreV mune YD, 5 7 4- § Rho chan A . f24 Neenp te, felon Adm, S£7 FO) $74. , - beh aan cf Saks nee gt tome rie aoe ‘5 a. a es al wo i i | “yy } a A ? Qe E y q 4 A hs Baw. : , a 4 F er ; E ; el 3 a > if oP W J |: Ae \ an \ i! 4 Hh | G t ~— iF Py 5 3 n ~_ A au SE a ¢ } rt oll CF A « ) f iq A a 4 | ) a . * ied : Set i i, | M | C , 1 } r q — QO — la 5 =~ \ 9 fs fe Schafer Cceuthe Zw dtl, W.4&. x | summed: This. 6 lie = / 4L Walt Tr frog Ut WZ 242, 399-4, pas ~ 12 SED, £43, 325.5 a 22 35 badly, ee bene 22-93 $6 . Ao 22_23. 50 JSyutlirr Giiitong | Ch. 44,45 50 JDhwats (hu. +4, deo Satlty, a ‘die 40-22-83 Sodlev, piel SO. 40-23 Keer , ss at 7, tuk? Liguar, w, S2- Lhorrkh, . am PHASLY Sk on, Cilla TN G4 UL5EL Spraet A.A. /2 Prank : //3 174 Tesi taf Sib = wrt Ke Wag JL ° JOM / “LT CK , SIO y lode. Paw Py) 1A O Miia tlhe) & /,22- Dau . 2 gwnh 13H Dipayor, ye Yb Sk , Co v= J4¢0-14£ Bia, 4 777, & JP Lor CZ, B . “ce /77 BWVLMK May Cee oe 7 f Ti 7 . t : | } } i ee ae wie te {4 ‘ee 4 MY 325, ¥3NYIUYT7T, G20 ‘Snell , Mehdi AY) 325,¢7214 WL20 7 J\ 2 | eM | 324, 232 4 ) a Se NE elo Byer Cum! PRu aa > £Ue ne mA ye SP ot. = = =! rl ps = — e Aim ni /N) gitle 26) 262 me Bie cit | Bone gj ' 26 ¥ Aharon, rhe X. 2622649 ih Teer, pLrnse ) 276 29 Mit, AA 2F%, asl / 955, 286, pI | lod foypes omg ah7 sheen Voce Qed U6. a) i chpte alton Upplarceleyy 3I2 A rx 20 Mbnrw -). 4 ; 7 po DQ : ! l phy 249 Latnttheecl. Pred Ff, BRE Chemritw, UY. 7h, S FF Hath Htecaxnt Ly, dee, Sb) Aegrndr Nathiene’ DH. $75 -376 Ledaget gules Mae FF Tor Srmk W.) JF 4 shyt, Co, JIT9 Optafee Phartkhw 9?) TI4 MArgent, ephw fy th $9 dharyger, ldugkK £, 24 Afb U ck 2 ok # / g Zbl, TR Tt «A L) 4 Ne cknw) (leg Y Are Z act, $7 Chinrct, 44 hemtay OOF pee Ps, de, Tet, s reek, Na rub, 7 2F1/ <Lhuers Ref $23 ; porpalrts., aad te.” 388 4 | ot 12 Ld, He ave 1) AolheF al -l2-43 47 Dh, #L. . Th. T4.9F Din ‘ ” S. > “K4 150 , / 7a ee ee 7 Junk / Ahrmes 244 Sohn, drndrwur 246 955 S324 Ihually, Genny, AHP, IS 3 f a ae Juche if, tee RIF ; | / vi 4 Pa a “4 o “ VMK v4 NUN IMYY as po oe ) / a / Dhorrpa~, Saw 354) 3.25 a eS 4 } / f , 4 is J Mal, Var Men 7. L635 ,263 Nauk Mien. Ca. 399. terete Ee. , BF ¢ Nterplile~ Ypres we. <. FO ghettl , Larrnts) 3/7 4A , EDI JIL >). « LOX Léhy st ~~ / fy 4 ee tcc_ocf ‘ Ali - NMelig lacy aay OO Seeh . 3 Re ofghte. fF. ma Bp “bec, gy KIB tyler, Cie BI/ Le Fp ELI), $68.5 70,57] | \“QLY~C@ I A.C #677 SL RENT TI _ - Remsen re Sass psi ea a TT SES a ne Sac ar ean orre gage rte seats ster eames = gf rae a al ORC gate ee ee o tee ane ey Ht ee a? —— : 19} 292 » age &.C. 4 bys YY ere ao oe ; 7 Nencros . eee a. { = p . — | a ; i aa ES om eed te eG 2 tae - 1 JJe fa vr fof. \ Sees 1 ES pees. Oak. A al, ak Wile -Gerree/ 77, Fo. Whaher 46a Machy A | La : atte, “Kabat V6, HOH IN| Fay, 42% YG badd) Baw 46 SOA, A441, 32 4, 420 ayy Wolfe, 9 Ww. 17 | oe | Wile Deca 3/ | 34 ' W bur ,A. 6b. Qh. $3 W hut Op i i eo 2 i Uiledr Jd Peckdery &, | 6d427° a Woahengtt, , Madiyl bf 69 W i Whe a. Var ase gb , WU hepoadr, Lr &. 2.5 | 7 Wegart) prs. bhiteuke- 15/ aye |, t) 9m Md Sac 155 ae heat PC . /7¢ if /ktb~, tyke LH Be Miher, Mennie eeece (94/93 | BWA War, YA. 243 mo We , Zia L 276 - 4 Ath, i 7 ts lb dlenrrs , Ahr Ay], 251 7 Aa 17 ys geR Ss —- = a Bowe wm aw as a) a2 Rk as Tags a . OQ. \ A Whew Vd) Y A 2¢ 0 ) . / WRG nd, Q L277 Ag / a . lb Si ot Y% ih Adie rrve ATA ant 0 CP 1 Ja UW ht: > - eS (4 “ -y U CAD, CMdth S'. 2 TY. 274.276 ig ee Eland Z/ 9s (Ree. 1) Mdellavdké Frsie. lo, 708 A (ih, ie ¢ 2 x2. 7 ‘i ao ~ &-; < *» > ; f a a ee we & . Be S3I0 67 a = HAF am) ery Ue Phe 3 Sera 7 = i CRS SS 5 — } cpl eed ca Ss >) a i} va Sol ' fs —— AY bb, B1 JL Ww _ é Cet ay he imiw- WY) a —_ Tho Aspro ak, 570A ) Lia nev, Kocde) 9 FO y 7 Oo f/ [LLarniv hee My a7 5b ero Har 447 IF 2 QV5IF Noe 252 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Everette Schafer : vs 0 JUDGMENT Dan Mitchell { This cause coming on to be heard ana being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendant have compromised and settled all matters and things in controversy and that the plairtiff desires to take a non-suit in this action: It is, therefore, on motion of J. G. Lewis, attorney for the plaintiff ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and the same is, hereby dismissed and the plaintiff is hereby taxed with the cost. This the 20th day of November, 194.7. Ce. Ge Smith Clerk Supertor Court Fee se hsb ae se dese dese 3: BTS FFE TE Se ede e Tet Noe 413 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County J. F. Duncan, Trading as Plumbing & Heating Contractor vs. JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT John M. Gaither and wife, Mabel Mae Gaither. i ee This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- Signed Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon the motion of J. G. lewis, Attorney for the plaintiff for judgment of non-suit, and it Sppearing that the defendant have paid the plaintiff's claim in full and that this action should be dismissed: It 1s, therefore, ordered and decreed that the plaintiff be and he ls hereby &llowed to take a Judgment of non-suit and that this action be and the same ts hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff be taxed with the costs. This the 7th day of Nov. 1947. C. G. Smith erk Superifor Court. BE Seah ie Sede He ETE SET Te ESE oe Tete SE ETE EE at Bi NO« 3UD4 Noe 3753 eS In the Superior Court, F North Carolina In the Super North Carolina, 2de] sount Jefore the Clerr November Term, 1 ‘ Iredell County ore the Clerk Iredell County. » 1947 J. L. MeLain, Administrator c.t.a., deve, | Catherine L. Mallory, f the ust: if He As Smith Vs JUDGMENT of the ustate o vs James B. Mallory. "| G. Kimbrough and This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the . imbrourh didk Superlor Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Zeb V, Nettles, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that this cause is heard upon a petition and motion made by the plaintiff to have the amount due *HIS Cause agall on @ judgment entered in this cause at the January Term 19,3 of the Superior oe onan ‘aymer, Commissioner, Court of Iredell County reduced to a lump sum, and it further appearing to the Al the lands described in the comp Court that the plaintiff and defendant have agreed and compromised all differ- as ich day of Desenber, ences between them growing out of this judgment, the defendant agreeing to pay Moor in Statesville, the plaintiff the sum of $580.00 as a full and complete settlement of all matter; and things now existing between the parties: It is, therefore, ordered and decreed by the Court, upon the agreeing between the parties, that the amount now due and owing the plaintiff by the defer ant upon the foregoing judgment is $580.00, and it ts adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the said sum of $580.00 to be paic as follows: $25.00 as of November ist., 1947, and a like sum of $25.00 on the first Cay of each and every month thereafter until the sum of $580.00 has been fully paid. it 1s further adjudged that upon the payment of this sum of $580.00 that the defendant will not be liable for any other amounts whatsoever to the plaintif!, ane Seiing « complete settlement between the plaintiff ana defendant. Defendant is taxed with the costs, This November l2th., 1917. Zed V. Nettles udge Presiding CONSENTED To: Je Ge lewis Kttorney for Platntiry Catherine L. ¥allory Plaintiir Scott & Collier torneys for efendan hereto Melony — “his cause coming on to be heard and eing heard before the — ee and seroned Clerk of th superior Court of Iredell County, North Carlina, 7. oe finds as facts that notice of attachement Stating the names Pate the acter vies, the amount of the claim, and in a brief way the nature of Neeeneonnnntonnn Hate St st sete test 3 ne action and demand, and requiring the defendants to appear at the office oer’ Clerk of the Superior Court, in Statesville, North Carolina, on the Dubligh v-eptember, 1947 and answer or demur to the complaint, has been Rent heen aS the law directs, and that the summons and warrant of attach- that the a cem duly served vy said publications as provided by law, and with ae “Ciendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the Sum of .j225.00 day »w verest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 9th. of August, 1947 until paid: «Ith day or Gay : » > + Qn a nL it is, therefore, ordered, ad judged and seorees oY the ea cenuat thereo, praintiffs recover oi the defendants the sum of »225..0 wit nteres 1947 on at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid vrom August 9th., » and the defendants are taxed with the costs of this action. It is further adjudged by the Court that execution be issued to the Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina commanding him that out of the personal property levied upon he satisfy the Judgment aforesaid, in go far as the proceeds of said property will satisfy same. —F a : > e This December 4rd., 19,7. Ce Ge Smith 6 Superior Go Flew 5F Bounty, North Carolina. DETERE TE TET TE ETE TET FETE TE SE TE TE TE GE HE FE He FE BEE res as Fe Tel ies ord Noe 30 NORTH CAR LINA IREDELL COUNTY We Re Sells vs { JUDGMENT Doe Church ’] This cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing to the Court that claim and delivery was issued in this matter, and that the defendmt gave a bond and kept the car, the subject of this controversy, but that before the plaintiff filed his complaint under his extension of time as he was entitled to, the defendant came in and paid to the plaintiff the amount of the indebtedness, and that the plaintiff and defendant have adjusted all matters and controversies existing between them, and that the plaintiff now comes into court through his attorneys, and asks to be given a non suit. It is, therefore, on motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorneys for the plaintiff, ordered that the plaintiff be, and he is hereby allowed to take a non suit in the said action, and said plaintiff is hereby non-suited. This the 3rd day of December, 19,7. C. Ge Smith erk o uperior Court, Iredell County. WES GE SE Sisk Sh abae se at deb sede de aos Shae se at sege ae NOe 4,08 North Carolina, In the Superior Court J. E- Johnson, ! Plaintiff, " vs ' JUDGMENT G. Pe Benge, Defendant i This causé coming on to be heard, and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant is indebthd to the plaintiff in the sum of $250.00 with interest on same from January 27th., 1947 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that said sum is due on a note, being a certain fixed amount, and that said note is secured by a chattle mortgaze on one K935 Model Ford Tgr., Sedan Automobile, Motor No. 18-1713610, executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff is entitled to the possession of said automobile so that he may sell same under his said chattle mortgage as provided by law and as provided in said chattle mortgage: Now, therefore, it is adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $250.00 with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 27th. day of January, 19.7 until paic, and that the costs of this action, be taxed against the said defendant, and that the automobile described above, and the possession thereof be given to the plaintiff so that he may sell the same, same, and he is authorized to sell &s provided by law and as set forth in said chattle mortgage, and credit the purchase price on this judgment. This December 3rd, 194.7. C. Ge Smith @rk Superior Court, Trede County, North Carolina. ETE SESE TEESE ESE Se TEN eae aE He ae SE TE FETE eS HE EE ESE Ais me ‘ na eo = terete ae — bem ae ee ae It 1s further adjudged by the Court that execution be issued to Noe 430 NORTH CAR LINA the Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina commanding him that out of Noe 4,08 i h onal property levied upon he satisfy the Judgment aforesaid, in go ® North Carolina, In the Superior june ‘| the person ¢ | far as the proceeds of said property will satisfy same. Bs Iredell County. ' This December 3rd., 197. C. Ge Smith : Je Be a j 6 Superior Court ; Plaint ’ * redel) Bounty, North 0 ett Carolina. va. , JUDGMEN 2 | | SESE RE TE TE DE TE ETE TET TEE SESE SESE TES He Te Te aE Fete i G. Pe Benge, . ' Defendant. j 4 This causé coming on to be heard, and being heard before the under- IREDELL COUNTY signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it Sell " appearing to the Court that the defendant is indebdtkd to the plaintiff in the We Re 8 { JUDGMENT sum of $250.00 with interest on same from January 27th., 1947 until paid at vei kl rr TG MENT r Chureh } the rate of six per cent per annum, and that said Dec Chure sum is due on a note, being a certain fixed amount, and that said note is secured by @ chattle mortgage This cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing to the Court that on one K935 Model Ford Tgr., Sedan Automobile, Motor No. 18-1713610 » &xecuted claim and delivery was issued in this matter, and that the defendant gave a by the defendant to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff is entitled to the a bond and kept the car, the subject of this controversy, but that before the posséssion of said automobile so that he may sell same under his said chattle plaintiff filed his complaint under his extension of time as he was entitled mortgage as provided by law and as provided in said chattle mortgage: to, the defendant came in and paid to the plaintiff the amount of the indebtednes: Now, therefore, it is adjudged and decreed by the Court that the and that the plaintiff and defendant have adjusted all matters and controversies plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $250.00 with interest thereon existing between them, and that the plaintiff now comes into court through his at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 27th. day of January, 197 until attorneys, and asks to be given a non suit. paid, and that the costs of this action, be taxed against the said defendant, It is, therefore, on motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorneys for the and that the automobile described above, plaintiff, and the possession thereof be given ordered that the plaintiff be and he is hereby allowed to take a Pp , : to the plaintirr go that he may sell the same, and he is authorized to sell non suit in the said action, and said plaintiff is hereby non-suited. &s provided by law and as set forth in said chattle mortgage, This the 3rd day of December, 197. and credit an C. G. Smith the purchase price on this judgment. erk of Superior court, : Iredell county. This December 3rd, 19.7.6 iy ‘ C. G. Smith er uperior Court, Irede County, North Caroline. WEEE Te ee Se sbse see shay STE Te bse ede se tt dese ye TELE ETE TEESE ETE Fe Tb Ne LE TE SESE Sb aE HE TEE SESE EEE SE SE No. hho North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Industrial Cooling & Moistening Company JUDGME VSe 0 Statesville Knitting Mills, Inc. 4 This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C, a, Smith, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that summons in the above entitled ection was issued on the 20th day of September, 197; that service of said summons was duly accepted by the Gefendant on the 22nd day of September, 197; and it appearing further to the Court that on the 20th day of September, 1947, at the time of the institut ing of said action, the plaintiff caused to be filed in said cause, a duly verified complaint attached to which is a itemized verified statement of the account sued on in this cause; that said account sued upon in said cause is based upon an entire and indivisible contract under the terms of which the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff, the sum of Thirteen Thousand, Five Hundred, Ninety-two ($13,592.00) Dollars, one-half of which was due on January 6, 1917, and the remaining half on April 1, 1947; that the defendant has made no payment on said amount, and that there is now due and owing by the defendant to the plaintiff, the sum of $13,592.00, with interest on one- half of said sum from January 6, 197, and interest on the remaining half from April 1, 1947, until paid and it appearing to the » at the rate of six per centum per annum; Court that the amount sued upon is an amount certain according to the terms of an indivisible contract between the plaintiff and the defendant and it further appearing to the fied complaint th Court from the plaintiff's veri: at the plaintirr, within the time permitted by statute, namely, on the 21st day of May, 1947, filed a notice and claim of lien against the property of the defendant, County, North Carolina, particularly described as follows: All of Lots No e Six (6), Seven (7), a (1), Two (2), Three (3), Four (h), Five (5), on the easterly side ¢nd the "Shoe Factory Lot" fronting 250 feet g 25 ; ive having @ depth of 150 feet and lying betret ae in Block No. 1 and algo Lots Nog. One k } zs "Woodlawn Addition . the page 185 of Re wnich is recorded in Plat Book l, the identical iad espera County, North Carolina and a le and wife, by deed dated Feb ro Knitting Mills, Inc., by R. H. page 425 of Deed Records for Iredell: Counts uto? Ci Tecorded in Book 176, same is p) And it further appearing to the Court that said action to enforce said lien was duly commenced in the the time Superior Court of Iredell County, within permitt ed by lew, namely, six months from the date of the filing situated in Statesville Inside Township, Ired#li§ of said lien; and it further appearing to the Court that no answer has peen filed by the defendant; that no motion for extending the time for filing the answer has been filed with the clerk, and no extension of time for filing answer has been granted by the clerk; and it further appearing to the court that the time for filing the answer in this cause expired on the 23rd day of November, 1947, and that no answer has been filed in said cause by said defendant; Now, therefore, the plaintirr through its attorneys, Raymer & Raymer, having moved for judgment by default final for the sum certain sought to be recovered in said itemized verified complaint, and for the clerk to declare said amount a lien upon the property described in the complaint; It is now, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed. 1. That the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant, the sum of $13,592.00, with interest on $6,796.00, from January 6, 197, and interest on the sum of $6,796.00 from the lst day of April, 197, until paid. 2. That said judgment be and the same is hereby declared to be a lien against the property described in the plaintiff's complaint, and that said lien against said property dates from the lst day of November, 1946, the day upon which the plaintiff began furnishing labor and material under said contract, hereinabove referred to; and, 3+ For the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk. This the 9 day of December, 19)7. C. G. Smith erk Superlor Cour BTR SESE Ab Se Fete SE Hee Se ese se Tee sE5e Se sede se ae No. ly2h NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Piedmont Lumber & Manufac- { turing Coe, i Plaintiff f JUDGMENT VSe t Watson W. Stearns Defendant { This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable Cc, a, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of [redell County, and it appearing to the Court that suxmons in the above-entitled action was issued on the 11 Gay of Noven- ber, 197; that said summons was duly served on the defendant on the 13 day of November, 197, by reading and delivering a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint to the defendant; and it further appearing to the court that on the 11 day of November, 197, et the time of the instituion of said action, the plaintiff caused to be filed in said cause & duly verified complain:, attached to which is an itemized verified statement of the account sued upon in said cause; and it appearing to the court that on February 13, 197, February 17, 19,7, February 13, 1947, February 19, 19,7, February 25, 197, March 5, 191:7, and March 7, 194.7, the plaintiff furnished to the defendant certain materials for the use in construction of certein buildines on land ~ delonging to the defendant and hereinafter Cescribed, and for which said material defendant fgreed to pag the sum of seven hundred eighty-one dollars and sixty-one cents, ($731.61); that of the materials furnished the defendant, materials to the value of five hundred eighty-three dollars and sixty-four cents, ($583.64), were used by the defendant in the construction of a building on & certain parcel of land tn the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, then and now Owned by the Cefendant, and described as follows: Lot #31, &s show ' ! at page 135 in th 2 of tre meP Of "Reynolda" ; recorded in Plat Book l Carolina. © office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, North That of the materials furnished the defendant, materials to the value f i , Of one hundred Seventy-one dollars and seventy cents, ($171.70), were used by the a } 3 © defendant itn the construction of a building on the certain parcel of land in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, then and now Owned by the defendant, and described 88 follows: Lot #22 as shown i eee On the map of "Re olda" En Careline?” in the office of the Registe F Ondde fer teeteas Gate” r of Deeds for Iredell County, North in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, then and now owned by the defendant, and described ag follows: Lots #70 and #71 as shown on the map of "Reynolda" recorded in Plat Book 1 at mge 135 in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, North carorine, put excluding therefrom that part of lots #70 and#71 deeded to George M. Hudson and wife by deed recorded in Book 95 at page 519 of the Iredell County Registry. And it further appearing to the court from plaintiff's verified complaint that the plaintiff within the time permitted by statute, namely, the 15 day of May, 1947, filed notices and claims of lien against the pro- perty of the defendant hereinabove described. And it further appearing to the Court that said action to enforce said liens was duly commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County within the time permitted by law, namely, six months from the date of the filing of said liens; and it further appearing to the court that no answer has been filed by the defendant; that no motion for extending the time for filing answer has beer filed with the clerk, and no extension of time for filing answer has been granted by the cierk; and it further Pppearing to the Court that the time for filing answer in said cause expired on the 13 day of Nec- ember, 197, and that no answer has been filed in said cause by the defendant; ar ‘Ow, therefore, the vlaintirf through its attorney, Barron K. Grier, heving moved for judgment by default final for the sum certain sought to be recovered in said itemized verified complaint, and for the clerk to ceclare said amount a lien upon the property described in the complaint; It 1s, now, therefore, ordered, adjucged, and decreed: 1. Thet the plaintiff have anc recover of the defendent- the sum of seven huncred eighty-one dollars and sixty-one cents, (5781.61), with interest thereon from the 1 Gay of April, 197, until paia; 2 « That said Judgment be and the same ts hereby declared to be @ lien against the property described in plaintiff's complaint, and thet said lien scainst sata property dates from the 7 day of Merch, 197. 3+ For the costs of this action. This, the 17 day of December, 1947. Ce Ge Smith Clerk of the Superior Court iO IN o HE SUPER OR COURT NORTH CAROLINA Z [REDELL COUNTY James =. Meacham and Jemes Me. f Watts, trading as, Meacham and Watts “asonry Company Plaintiffs { JUDG'ENT VSe 4 e Watson We. Stearns 4 Defendant. 4 This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons in the above-entitled action was issued on the lth day of November, 195):7; that said summons was duly served on the defendant on the ) Gay of November, 191.7, by reading and delivering e copy of the sumnons anc a copy of the complaint to the defendant; and it further appear'tng to the court that on the lth dey of November, 197, at the time of the institu- tion of said action, the plaintiff caused tobe filed in said cause a duly verified complaint, attached to which is an itemized verified statement of the account sued upon in said cause; and it appearing that on January l, 19:7, January , 1947, February 13, 197, and February 18, 1947, the plaintiffs furnished to the cefendant certain materials for use in the con- ‘fraction of certain buildings on land belonging to the defendant and here- inafter described, and for which sala material defendant agreed to pay the . sum of three hundred twenty dollars end ninety cents, ($320.90); and it further appearing to the court from plaintiffs verified complaint that the plaintiffs within the time permitted by statute, namely, the 19 day of ‘fy, 1947, filled a notice and claim of lien against the property of the Gefendant, located in the City of Statesville, County of {fredell, sand more partic larly described as follows: Lots 22, 3}, 70 and 71 out e 70 an » 3h, 2 72, *xcluding that part of Lots Nos. ono ay ened 80 e or ge Me Hudson and wife by Geed recorded in Book 95 at Pag > he . ed Iredell County Registry, &s shown on the map of Reynolda -corded in Plat Book 1 at pege 155 of the Iredell County Registry: wid Lt further appearing ‘o the Court that sald action to enforce said lien wag duly commenced in the Supertor Co the time wt of Iredell County within permitted by law, namely, six months from the date of the filing of ‘nd 1t further Sppearing to the courp that no the defendant; that n aa said lien ; by Oo motion for extending the time for filing answer has deen filed with + . L With the cler;, and no extension of time for filing answer has deen eranted by the Clerk; and it further appearing to the Court that the time for filing A 0 answer has been file* Be As Ne os and that no answer has been filed in said cause by the defendant; Now, therefore, the plaintiffs through their attorney, Barron xk, Grier, having moved for judgment by default fined for the sum certain sought to be recovered in said itemized verified complaint, and fob the clerk to declare said amount a lien upon the Property described in the complaint; It is now, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed: 1. That the plaintiffs have an3 recover of the defendant the sum of three hundred twenty dollars ane ninety cents, ($320.90), with interest thereon from the 13 day of February, 1947, until paia; 2. That said judgment be and the same is hereby declared to be a lien against the property described in the plaintiffs! complaint, and thet said lien against said property dates from the 18 day of Februery, 1947. 3e For the costs of this ection. This the 17 dey of December, 19,7. Ce G. Smith Clerk of the Superfor Court Wibteis elle teeth bib se ese se se WEEE Ob TE Se sedt tee se Now hdd North Carolina In the Superior Covrt Iredell County. Before the Clerk frank F. Perry Jr. 4 ¥e j JUDGMENT James T. Cobb Q This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the indersizned Clerk of the Supertor Court, and tt appearing to the Court that the matters tn controversy between the plaintiff and defendant have deen settled ana the plaintiff desires to have the action dismissed; it 1g therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be and same is hereby dismissed and the plaintiff be taxed with the costs, which were paid in advance. This the 40th day of December, 19];7. C. Ge. Smith Clerk Superflor Court Th SENT ib bse se se sete: Hose St ese see sede ese RRR a a ns eT ne ee Uy52 North Carolina, Iredell Countye No. In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk. tladys Powell Washington ) \ MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY NON-SUrtT Vs. Holand T. Washington ) The Petitioner, Gladys Powell “ashington, plaintiff, through her attorney respectfully showeth: l. That she desires to take a voluntary non-sult in this cause, 2. That she be taxed with the cost incured in the cause, This the 9th day of January, 19)g. Hugh G. Mitchell _ Attorney for Petitioner. JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT this cause coming on to be heard and bein heard before Hon. C. G, Smith, Clerk of Superlor Court of Iredel County, North Carolina, upon motion xf the attorney for the petitioner, Gladys Powell Washington, and it appearing to the Court that the petitioner, Gladys rowel) vashin «ton, desires that a 3 Judgment of voluntary non-suit be entered in the cause. [t is, therefore, orcered, considered and adjudreed that a judament of non-sult be entered in the cause and t at the petitioner be taxed with the cost. This the 9th day of January, 1g. Ce. Ge Smith nee Clerk Supertor Court, Lredell County, North Carolina. NOe 4345 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court Before the Clerk gurick General Accident and Liability ce Company, Ltd. — a * Plaint iff, V8e JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT G. & Me Motor Transfer Company, Inc., Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before His Honor, C.G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the Attorneys for the Plaintirr that the matters and things in controversy have been settled between the parties, and that the Plaintiff has elected to take a nonsuit in its action: IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED That the Plaintirr's cause of action is nonsuited and dismissed. This January 22, 198. Ce Ge Smith C. G. smith, Clerk of the Supertor Court of Iredell County. PETE te Bese See hte eae EEE abe SE EE Sede ese IN THE SUPERIOR. COURT FIRST WkEK~- JANUARY Monday, January 2 Eton et? North Carolina, Iredell County. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N. c, on the 26th day of January, 1948, at 10:00 O'clock A. M. when ana where His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Spring Term, 194, is present and presiding, anda Honorable John R. McLaughlin, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. WwW. D,. Morrison, High Sherirfr of Iredell County, is present and opened Court by order of the Court. We D, Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into 9 open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the Januery Term, 1943, First week, to-wit; and for a Grand jury to serve for a six months period ending June 30th, 1948, to-wit: John D. Patterson A. E. Welborne R. D. Grier R. Me McClung Archie Bost Fred A. McLain levi Trivette C. L. McLellana Mrs. C. G. Fitzgerald Page Beatty W. R. Poole Harold H. Collins Mrs. Myrtle Perry Fox W. S. Martin Fred Lee Overcash wW. P. Blackwelder James 4. Vrawford Harry H, Abernathy Wayne Baker FP. M, Harrington N. E. Brown He O. Montgomery Ira D. Hefner J. E. Moore § L| I (2 S| Le OF P louis 0. Brown A. G. Campbell, Jr. L. A. Lippard Fraicis M. Bell W. C. Austin M. C. Dagenhart J. N. Brendell J. Be Goforth Re A. Wilson R. G. Wright S. J. Stillwell Je Ae Perry The fqllowing good and lawful men were duly drawn and sworn as the Grand Jury to serve for the six months period ending June 30th, 1948, to-wit: John D, Patterson fra D. Hafner = i | \ R. A. Wilson L. A. Lipm rd on Ades | a Page Beatty S. J. Stillwell W. S. Martin G. L. MeLlelland A. G, Campbell, Jr, Harold H. Collins levi Trivette W. P. Blackwelder We Re Poole F. M. Harrington Fred Lee Overcash Francis M. Bell J+ B. Goforth Je Ae Perry Ira D. Hefner, sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. L. C, Boyd, was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury The following was excused by the Court, Loulse 0. 2rown Fox The following were excused by Court until May Term Mrs. Myrtle Perry The fo lowing was excused on Doctor's certificate, R. G. Wright The following was not returned, J. E. Moore PON Sa \ Bite, ¥ i m , sian ee aad Peli al!) ih | ” 4 ey i Noe 717 State vs Robert Watts No. 725 State vs T. Le Nixon No. 70 State vs Manual Shoemaker No. 764 State vs Howerd B. Bennick No. 765 State vs James C. Horton NO. U23 State vs Dee Woods No. 825 State vs Murphy Chambers No. 853 State vs James E, Bruce No. 391 State vs R. Shaw Brown No. 909 State vs Thos, Le Summer g No. 912 State ve —_——> cc i re — >= =< _-=-°o 2—-:> “>> = —_-_—-_)> > — =_ ee | Henderson P. Redmon No, 935 State vs Clifford ¢, Hall, Jr, No. 90 State Vs John H. Summers IN THE SUPERIOR COUR‘! FIRST WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, January 26th, 19)8 NON=-SUPPORT Continued under former order BASTARDY Continued under former order NONSSUPPORT Continued under former order LARCENY No” Pros With Leave LARCENY Nol Pros With Leave BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Alias Capias BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Cost Paid ore. HOUSEBREAKING Continued EMBEZZLEMENT Defendant called and failed Caples « Judgment Nisi Sci Fa an NON-SUPPORT Alias Ca ias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY lise teat WEAPON FORGERY Continued under former order LAR CENY Alias Capias No. 92 state vs David Overcash NOe 92 State vs Onie Le Nicholson NO. 954 state vs Richard G. Miller Hox Ah TORO ve Cex dex iro Noe 966 State vs John F. Lambert No. 1012 State vs Joe E. Turpin Noe 1033 & 103) State vs Rrasker Young No. 1048 & 1049 State vs Frasker Young No. 1004 State s vs A) Voy , Ellen L. ‘KeSier No. 1026 State vs Gwyn Chambers No. 1030 State vs 0.0. Walker "Stator Va Clyde Fox No. 10 Sate Deak Oger Ramse Cozy - a ONS ME em Gene oOo eee oo eo SF A wm ee <> > > ee oS eS ce <> ee KD ae IN THE SUPERIOR cour? FIRST WKEK - JANUAR Monday, January 2 LARCENY Alias Capias BASTARDY ae 16,37 Continued under former order ABANDONMENT AND NON -SUPPORT Continued under former order RDE ARSENE MEAT BEATIN EAPON abbire Gerlee BREAKING, ENTERING AND LAR CENY Alias Capilas DRIVING DRUNK Alias Captas ATTEMPTED RAPE Nol Pros With Leave ATTEMPTED RAPE Nol Pros With Leave BIGAMY Continued for the Defendant TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR Defendent called and failed e and Capias. Judgment ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Nol Pros With Leave ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued under former order ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley enters Nisi Sci Fa &® plea of Nolo Contendre to Assault With Deadly weapon = 5 or Li No. 968 State vs Grover McMullen C-341 No. 1050 State vs John Le Murry, Jr. W-25 No. 1052 State vs Harvey Propst C-48 No. 10h1 State vs Vance Peacock W=42 No. lOkk State ves William Owens Willard E. Alley No. 1055 State vs John Leonard No. 1056 State vs John Leonard No. 1057 State vs John Leonard No. 1054 State vs Ruel L, Shoemaker No. 1060 State vs Jamas Robinson =o —<— -_-_—o eo ee — oe ee a oo > -_=_—-ollco oc IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, January 26th, 1948 LY WEAPON sn at Cena his attorney R. A. Collier entered a plea of at assault with deadly weapon ” The canaaat an thee is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for not 1¢,, than FIFTEEN MONTHS nor more than TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS to be assigned to work under the control and supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. RI VING DRUNK DI The defandent through his attorney, W. R. Battley entered a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled. At the close of the State's evidence the defendant moves for judgment as of Non-Suit. Motion allowed, LAR CE NY The defendant entered a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled, returned a verdict of guilty of larceny as charged in the Bill of Indictment, LARCENY The defendant enteres a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled. During the progress of the trial the defendant tenders to the state a plea of guilty of temporary Larceny, which plea is accepted by the State, The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for the period of TWELVE MONTHS, and assigned to work under the control and supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is not to run concurrently with any other sentence and is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay the costs of this action, which shall include the sum of $200.00 for the use and benefit of Mra. Se Kk. Holland, the said amount to be paid in installments of $10.00, the first payment to be made on Monday, Februery 2nd, 1948. In the event the defendant shall fail to make payment on or before Monday of each week, Caplas to issue to put the potece sentence into effect without further order of the ourt. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Continued for the defendants. The defendant William Owens required to give a bond in ti sum of $500.00 DRIVING DRUNK AND SPEEDING The defendant called and failed, i Sei Fa and Capiag. Judgment Nis ASSAULT WITH D EADLY WEAPON The defendant called and failed, i Fa and Capilas, Judgment Nisi Sc CARRY CONCEALED WEAPON The defendant called and failed. and Capias, Judgment Nisi Sci Fe FALSE PRETENSE Cont inued for the defendant. LAR CE NY IRD AOL PARES Nol Prog sed IN THE SUERIOR court FIRST WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, January 26th, 1948 - 1058 f DRIVING DRUNK ° The defendant through hi ate g 8 attorne enter a { of guilty of driving drunk as chkreed’ —— Richard M. Robinson # W-30 No» 1059 , — anahe & case consolidated with No. 1061 for tkial t The defendant through his Attorney J. R. ile Richard M. Robinson } — @ plea of not guilty. W-30 ury sworn and empanelled and retu 3 of NOT GUILTY. rned a verdict No. 1061 § LARCENY state 4 This case consolidated with No. 1059 for trial ve 4 The defendant entered a plea of NOT GUILTY. Bobby Gene Moose { Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict W-20 of NOT GUILTY. Noe 1079 § MURDER State { The Grand Jury returns in Open Court in a body, vs { (eighteen present) a True Bill of Indictment charging Charlie Houser { the defendant Charlie Houser, with the capital offense C-0 of Murder in words and figures as follows: "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY. JANUARY TERM, 1948 THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: That Charlie Houser late of the County of Iredell, on the 20 day of December A.D., 1947, with force and arms, at and in the said County, unlawfully, willfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforesaid thought, did kill and murder Haven Scott contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, end against the peace and dignity of the state. John R. McLe ghlin Solfeltor. "No. 1078 STATE vs Charlie Houser _ MURDER Witness Je Le Mayberry X C. M. Jones X W. D. Morrison X Sam Scott Lonnie Ingram Those marked X sworn by the un- dersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found A TRUE BILL No. 1078 Ira D. Hefner State { MURDER oreman o © Grand Jury - ‘ On this the 26th day of January, A.D., 1948 there comes Charlie Hou { into open Court, in the custody of ®. D. Morrison, High Sheriff ser of Iredell County, North Carolina, whose prisorer he 8, Charlie Houser in his own person, and the said prisoner being at the bar of the Court, and Mr. W. R. sattley, Counselor for the defendant is present in Court in behalf of the defendant, the Bill of Indictment in this case was read to him, and forth- with it is demanied of him, the said Charlie Houser, how he will acquit himself of the premises in sad bill of Incidtment specified and charged upon him, and the said Charlie Houser answering the Bill of Indictment aforesaid, says he is NOT GUILT f th end MURDER therein charged, and there- fore, for good or oval: he puts himself u nehis Country and His God, and Hon. John R, Mclaughlin, Solicitor for the State, in his behalf, doth the like, THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, January 26th, 1948 This Honorable Court takes recess until Tuesday Morning, January No. 1062 | State é | 27th, 194d at 9:30 O'clock. , vs if Robert Teague , * Wo. 1063 State Nested: a Jerry Garrison JUDGE PRESIDINGY,/ #-20 = 3 No. 106) State vs Jerry Garrison W-20 No. 1078 State vs Charlie Houser FRONT No. 1051 State vs Roy Rudisell > No. 10 @ State. vs H We}, Bet, Jr. Gug Brown C=30 IN THE SUPERIOR CouR?T FIRST WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Tuesday, January 27th, 198 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment Tue sday Morning, January 27th, 1948 at 9:30 O'clock. { SPEEDING The defendant called and failed, § Fa and Capias Judgment Nisi Set i ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant through his attorney, a plea of guilty as charged. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common Jail of Iredell Co less than TWELVE nor more than EIGHTEEN MON to work under the supervision of the Public Works Commission. Oe ee we State Highway and LARCENY The defendant through his Attorney, J. a plea of guilty as charged, The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined in the State PRISON at Raleigh at hard labor for not less than SEVEN nor more than TEN YEARS. This sentence is to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed in No. 1063, and it is suspended for FIVE YEARS upon the condition that the defendant be of good behavior, and work regularly and not in any wise violate the law during that period, otherwise, Capias to issue to put the prison sentence into effect. R. Burgesss aters MURDER Continued for the State DRIVING DRU NK Nol Prossed <—-—_ <—> <> BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY The defendant enters a plea of guilty as charged. The judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for not less than TWO nor more than THREE YEARS, and assigned to work under the cort rol and supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is suspended for a period of FIVE YEARS upon the following conditions: 1. That he re-enter the Stonewall Jackson Training School and remain there, abiding by the rules of the School and conducting himself properly, as a sthdent until he is discharged from the school by its authorities. 2. That after he is prop rly discharged from the Stonewall Jackson Training School, the defendant be of good behavior and either attend school regularly or work at some useful occupation and not in any wise violate the law for a period of FIVE YEARS. Otherwise, Capias to issue to put the Prison Sentence into effect, at any subsequent term of Court. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant through his Attorney, W. R. Battley enters a plea of not Guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of NOT GUILTY. Je R. Burgess enters THS, and assigned 7 © ce Sule ee nl SX, = et kates AOS we aaa epeuaeagaete ae OOS N THE SUPERIOR COURT rrnsi WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1 FIRST WEEK - JANU Tuesday, January ¢7th, 194 ARY TERM, 1948 IN THE SUPERIOR couRT 8 2 Tuesday, January 27th, 1948 Noe 1073 state ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant through his Attorney, 2. V. Long, Jr. enters a plea of guilty of Assault With a Deadly No. 1046 BREAKING AND EMTERE®® Weapon The defendant bhrough his Attorney Grant Bolmer Ort erg g a. —" plea of not guilty. ler d empanelked. Sweet Sad = oe eat vheougt: his Attorney enters @ plea of ourpp Cee C- eer = — Fes ae vs William R. Sadler, -—rr, LARCENY Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX MONTHS, and assigned to work on the roads under the supervision of the State High- way and Public Works Commission. - 10 No. 1058 DRIVING DRUNK se eis ies denileata No» 1052 g te The judgment of the Court 1s n Sta in the common jail of Iredell County for the be an Robinson ie i FOUR MONTHS, and assigned to work on the roads a: a — under the supervision of the State Highway and Public - ission. rs ee is suspended on the following condition: 1. That the defendant pay a Fine of $100.00 and the cosge. That he not operete a motor vehicle upon the Publi; ear Highways for TWELVE MONTHS, his license heing suspended : He that period. ; se wae That he be of good behavior for the period of 4 THREE YEARS, and particularly that he not operate a } ery Fe lp ll ie ier hl Propst SS gee nisi motor vehicle while intoxicated during that time. REPORT OF THE GRAND JURY FOR JANUARY TERM OF IREDELL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1063 & ROBBERY Continued until May Term, 1948 No. 1067, 1069 State The newley drawn Grand Jury of Iredell County met in regular session vs James Grover Sigmon Jack Franklin Joe Brittian -Alias Woad Brittian — Monday, Janaary 26, 1948 and disposed of all Bills ccming before same. We visited the offices in the Court House, County Jail ara surround- ings, County Home and State Prison Camp; thse visits being made by No. 1060 State vs James Robinson LARCENY Nol Pros Committees: Committee No. 1, Ira Hefner in charge inspected the Court house and County Jail and found every thing in excellent condition with three 9 5 bo z © a Le | j \ 4 exceptions. BREAKING, ENTERING AND LAR CE NY 7 Mo atate? vs Alvin M. Pope W-27 The defendant tenders to the State a receiving stolen goods in the amount of the State accepts. lea of guilty of 20.09 which ples he 2. Plumbing 1s in need of some repair at Jail, Treads on steps leading to Court room. the judgment of the Court is that the defendant be in 5 prisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for not less . than TNELVE MONTHS nor more than EIGHTEEN MONTHS, and assigned to work at any county work for such part of the said sentence ag: his service are satisfactory, otherwise, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. Some tile in the basement of the Clerk's office be re-set. Committee No, 2, Harold Collins in charge visited the County Home and found every thing in good condition. 49 Inmates; 13 white men, 19 white women, 6 colored men, 6 colored women, &@lso 6 prison helpers. 22 cows, No. 1075 : BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY State Continued for the Defendant vs Williem L. Owens 4 males, Plenty of meat and other food supplies, a nice flock of chickens. Committee No. 3 J. A. Perry, in charge visited the State Prison Camp and found 77 colored men, Everything there is in excellent condition. No. 1072 oe) ) FORGERY F « f The defendant tanders through his Attomey Zed ve sree Tee Hetase William R. Sadic {long Jr. to the State a plea of guilty of issuing & rand Jury Sweet Sadler ’’ 2188 fworthless check in the amount of $16.20 which ple — '_ . r Ls accepted by the State. 32 The judgment of the Court is thet the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a nths, and assigned to work of roads under the supervision of the State Highwsy we pg Works Commission, ost S sentence 1s suspended upon payment of the ¢ for ts action which shall include the sum of $16.2, for the use and benefit of Oscar Madden, and upon ¢ further condition that he tor for thé period of THREE YeaRs, © © °f 800d behav January a 1948 aunque 7g, gute. —— Sco! > ae 2 = SEL ee a ae see AL eh Sot Se “$= rs eae - Zz (2 | ] mc if er — iw a ! ‘ Woe SG No. 1065 & 1066 State vs Ross R. Rogers NOe 1070 State vs George A. Hurst Noe 1071 State vs George A. Hurst FORGERY — ates th IN THE SUPE FIRST WEEK - Tue sday, sa <a RIOR COURT JANUARY TERM, 1948 January 27th, 19 Continued for the defendant. LARCENY Continued for the defendant ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued for the defendant This Honorable Court takes a rece 1948, at 10:00 O'clock, ss until Monday Morning, February 2nd, IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TEHY » 1948 Monday, February 2nd, 1948 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM, 1948 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. This Honorable Court convenes Sccording to adjournment on Monday Morning, February 2nd, 1948 at 10:00 O'clock, with Honorable J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding, and Holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District spring Term, 1948, present and presiding. @ D. Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into Open Court the names of the following good and lawful mén and women to serve as jurors for this the Second Week of the January Tern, 1940, Iredell superior Court, to-wit: C. C. Foster W. M. Weugh W. C. Chambers D. We. Mason William F, Livingood Je H. Brown H. B. Wagner “rs. Clarence L. Moore W. W. Thompson Nathan 0. McElwee Harry W. Campbell L. Me. Scott W. Be Bobbitt D. E. Frezier Pete Mitchell S. B. Henderson H. B. Houston Ge Be Sprinkle, sr. Mrs. Alma E. Kivett J. Le Allison, Jr. E. Ke Kyles S- F. Holcomb T. Me. Rickert B. S. Templeton D. We Mason, excused on Doctor's Certificate — A oF Kivett, Mrs. Clarence L. Moore and W. C. Chambers, The following men constitute whet shell hereinafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: C. C. Foster, H. B. Wagner, Nathan oO. McElwee, W. B. Bobbitt, s. B. Henderson, S. F. Holcomb, W. M. Waugh, Wm. F. Li vingood, ferry W. Campbell, D. &. Frazier, H. B. Houston and J. L. Allison, Jr. No. 4370 Viole Bradshaw DIVOR CE The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: vs Charles Bradshaw STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY op IREDELL IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Viole Bradshaw "= ISSUES Charles Bradshaw complaints Nere the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the Yes. ch other ¢ Had the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from ®&cetlo venore than two years next preceeding the commencement of this " Yes s Caroling a Had the plaintirr resided continously in the state of North ” = than six (6) months next before the starting of this suit? ”, fe Hip eh Ra | Y i ‘ : =, gee * j : — F "we | Y ‘ 4 a. See \ ie Bee - oe foe ~ ge - z © a re as ~< . ae Laan nae ana aN SUPERIOR COURT mecue WK JANUARY TERM, a Monday, February 2nd, 194 In the Superior Court ; INA STATE OF NORTH CAROL COUNTY OF IREDELL Sbradshaw Voss Plaintiff, JUDGMENT Vs. Charles Bradshaw, Defendant. This cause now being heard before the undersigned Judge of the above court and a jury. regularly and properly to the said Judge that the case was brought oul welea ca0 ta the proper issues were submitted to the jury and thet all a them were answered in favor of the plaintiff. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ee. meee Pye BM gee Bg isting between the above plain ei dus ete 7 Court and an absolute divorce is hereby grantei, This the 2 day of Feb., 1948. Je Will Pless, Jr. JUDE PRESIDING HESETE TE Te IESE SESE Sh He SEE He He TEE NOs 406 Lester T. Crider aceanii vO Vs. The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empm elled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Maggie B. Crider NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Lester T. Crider vs ISSUES Maggie B. Crider 1. Is the plaintiff, Lester T. Crider, a resident of the State of North Carolina all his life as alle ged in the complaint and for more than one year before filing complaint? Answer Yes 2. Were the plaintiff, Lester T, Crider, and the defendmt, Magelé 8. Crider, duly married on the 16 dey of Nov » 1932, as alleged in the compleis'! Answer Yeg 4 Did the defendant, Ma ° aintiff ~ester T. Crider, without ny jus Seno cn ee een naones the Pe ¢ t cause on the party of the plaintiff on oF about the 20 day of Sept., 1945, and has the defendant lived separate and apart from the plaintiff since that time and for to the institution of this action? nad more than two years pr Answer Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February 2nd, 198 Worth Carolina In the superior Court Iredell County lester T. Crider vs Maggie B. Crider This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and after the jury being duly impanelked, and the Judge passi ng, on the evicence and the evidence being submitted to the jury, and after his honor J. Will Pless charge to the jury md submitted of the following issues: 1. Is the plaintiff, Lester T, Crider, a resident of the State of North Carolina and has be been a resident of the State of North Carolina all his life as alleged in the complaint and for more than one year before filing complaint? Answer Yes 2. Were the plaintiff,Lester 7. Crider, and the defendant, Maggle 5. Crider, duly married on the 16 dey of Nov., 19%2 » &8 alleged in the com- plaint? Answer Yes 4. Did the defendant, Maggie B. Crider, abandoned the plaintiff, lester T. Crider, without any just cause on the part of the plaintiff on or about the 20 day of Sept., 1945, ané has the defendant lived separate and apart from the plaintiff since that time and more than two years mior to the institution of this action? Answer Yes The jury having answered the issues 68s set out above in favor of the plaintiff ang against the defendant it is. THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, thet the bonds of matrémony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved end that an absolute divorce be granted the plaintiff, Lester T. Crider/ This the 2 day of February, 198. J» Will Pless, Jr. Wet SRE tee Se at ee Hh ah abe abs SHES Heh de st est URE EH ar een pine steepness b> ca-naconde maiwowrsgs acsconns IN THE SUPERIOR COUR SECOND WEa - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February ¢nd, 1948 No. hill Verdie Wooten Young Divorce The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn ana empane}) = answers the issues submitted to it as follows; a Noah Le. Young In the Superior Court North Carolina January Term, 193 Iredell County Verdie Wooten Young V8e Noah Le. Young 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolins for more than one year next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes. 3. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more ag alleged in the Complaint: answer. Y@Se NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1948 Verdie Wooten Young vs Noah L. Young This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Term, 1948 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitte to it in the favor of the plaintiff ana against the defendant, ss fully appesrs in the record; L t is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matri rimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the rn 7 same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintirr is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. This the 2 day of February, 19d. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presta Ing 08 eet etek He test thie te Wie te thse Hoe Ute teste He “ IN THE SUPERIOR Mur? SECOND WEEK « JANUARY TERY ,1948 Monday, February 2nd, 1948 No ° 418 - Holland Richard B DIVORCE VSe The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Richard B. Holland vs Retha Le Holland 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the state of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer Yes 3e Did the defendmt commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT [KEDELL COUNTY Richard B. Holland vs ( Retha L. Holland $ This cau-e coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless and a jury at the January Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that defendant has been properly served with process by publication, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer "yes," 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer "yes," 3e Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer. "Yes," Now therefore, on motion of Macon M. Simons, attorney for the pldntirf, it ts ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Richard B. Holland be and ne te hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Retha L. Holland, “nd that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and 7 ‘efendnt be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this 8tlo nto be taxed by the clerk. This the 2nd day of February, 198. Je Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding FEM W 36 se de thse Sete He dee ae ee IN THE SUPERIOK COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February ¢<nd, 1948 No. 421 Pearl Grant Allison — Plaintiff, DIVO bint aii bien aes The Divorce Jury #1 being ys nd empanelieg Vs answers the issues submitted t it as follows: William T. Allison, Defendant. In the Superior Court NORTH CAROLINA, January Term, 198 IREDELL COUNTY. Pearl Grant Allison Plaintiff, VS. Nilliam T. Allison, Defendant ee eo ee oe > - 2) u SG e w 1. bid the plaintiff, Pearl Grant Allison, and the defendant, Willian [. Allsion, intermarry as alle ged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes. ee Have the plaintiff, Pearl Grant Allison, and the defendant, Willis f. Allison, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years imnediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes. 4. Has the plaintiff, Pearl Grant Allison, been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for one year immediately preceding the commence- ment of this action? ANSWER Yes, ue NORTH CAROLINA, In the Supertor Court a | IREDELL COUNTY. January Term, 1948 — Pearl Grant Allison, <_ Plaintirf, ‘ Vs. f JUDGMENT William fT. Allison, ‘ Defendant. t This cause coming on to be heard j Will Pless, Judge Presiding, and a Jur of [redel] County, » and being heard by His Honor, J+ y at the January Term, 198, superior Cou! North Carolina » and the following issues having been gubaitte to and answered by the jury, to-wit: 1. Did the Plaintir r Te Allison, intermarry as alleged ta’ then ANSWER yes, Allison, and the defendant, Willis omplaint? Pearl Arant Allison, rt fom ®ach o and the defendant, willl” 3. Has the plaintiff, Pearl Grant a t sident of the Sta a commencement of ANSWER YE SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM 194.8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, February 2nd, 1948 llison, been a bona fide e of North Carolina for one year immediately preceding this action? Ss. The Court finds that summons in this action was duly served on the defendant, William T ¢ Allison, by Wade Moore, a Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, on the 8th day of November, 1947. The Court further finds the plaintiff, that William T. Allison, the defendant, the institution of this action, is now now, nor has he tion of this action, from the affidavit of Pearl Grant Allison, was not, at the time of been since the institu- in the military service of the United States of America. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are, dissolved, and that the plaintiff is granted an absolute divy- orce from the defendant. This the 2 No. 420 Oscar Wilson vs 4evenia Wilson NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Oscar Wilson Plaintirr Vs. Levenia Wilson Defendant. let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintirr. day of February, 193. Je Will Pless, Jr. Peete Be: tet eee EEE TE EE ot He ae SE ob DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 1H jm 1c ic pt 1m 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendmt lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answers} Yes Ze Has the North Carolina for one Answer: Yes 3+ Have the from ®ach other fr two Answer: Yes plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the state of year next preceding the bringing of this action? plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart years next preceeding bringing of this action? So : eee = ae a « er fe ol lho ‘ are rr eae ( \ 4 | 4 a Le z Oo ra Le th > *. ] Be Vier er RAL 20 A 4 a Pl ee N J * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February 2nd, 1948 NORTH CAHOLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ii : IREDELL COUNTY Oscar Wilson Plaintiff Vs. Levenia Wilson Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before, His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jre, Judge Presiding and a jury at the January Term, 1948, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the defendant has been personally served with process, and the following issues havins been submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendang lawfully married as & lleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes", @- Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for one year next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer "Yes", 3 Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next precedim bringing of this action? Answer: "“yes", It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, This the 2 day of January, 19,8, J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding Fee tet eth dese tae Wee te tet hse dese Fee Sesh te tee IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, Februepy end, 19448 NOo 2g . Morrow Thomas Ne M DIVORCE on The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Willie Gertrude Morrow NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDE LL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1948 Thomas Ne Morrow ' Vs. Willie Gertrude Morrow {4 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alle ged in the Complaint? Answer Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than one year next preceding the filing of this Complaint ? Answer. Yes. 3. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of Two years or more “8s alle ged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 198 Thomas N. Morrow Vs. 4 Willie Gertrude Morrow q This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Term, 1948 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues sub- mitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully *“ppears in the record; and it appearing to the Court that there was born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant a child, Shirley Joan Morrow, and that the defendant herein has the care and custody of said child; and it further “Prearing to the Court and the Court finds as a fact that the defendant is a fit and Buitable person to have the custody and control of the mihor child, Shirley Joan Morrow, and that the best interest of said minor would be served 7 being in the custody of her mother, she being found to be a fit person for he custody of sata minor. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of "atrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the “me are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby grarted an absolute dive “se from the defendant. It 1s further ordered, adjudged and decreed that Aa el bene ee es any Sal IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1943 Monday, February nd, 194.8 the defendant, Willie Gertrude Morrow, be and she 1s hereby awarded full ang complete care, custody and CER GF OS EES GEE, SUEY ee re This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor ehilq, is retained for further orders. nip Git es This the 2nd day of February, 19,8. J. Will Pleas, Jr, Judge Presiding — Sh ie th ie th tb Se te tb Se Fe eae He EE RE TE EE Te Te te ae ete NO. 432 Henrietta P. Horne Se a SO ere ee DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: “- j { vs. : ( ) John Thomas Horne an NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court January Term, 19\% Henrietta P. Horne } ' es { ISSUES ; f John Thomas Horne Gy ; aot ane = 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes rs ee Vid the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institu FRONT Wamu tion of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes ‘ - ° 3+ Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more bhan six months before the come ncement of this action, 48 p slleged in the complaint? ‘ , Answer Yes NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court A IREDELL COUNTY, January Term, 1948 Henrietta P. Horne i Vs. 0 Im ic jo jQ i= je i= I John Thomas Horne { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J- Will Plew Jud uege Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as s* out in the record: ¢ Plaintiff, Henrietta P, Horne, and th » 4nd the ome--are hereby dissolved,—and-—one defendant, John Thomas Horna, be .IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February end, 1948 same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintirr is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. Will Pless Jr. Judge Presiding ——— ; eae AAE TE SEHD Se Ae ee Hh ab te Se He eee abet Hb 4 Hed 3-4 6: NOe 454 Roy L. Garris DIVORCE a, The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanelle d f answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Jane Lucille Garris WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 198 Roy Le Garris ) Vs. ISSUES Jane Lucille Garris 9 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Jompleint? Answer: Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for a period of more than two years as alleged in the C omplaint? Answer: Yes 3e Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State or North Carolina for s period of more than one year next preceeding this action as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes jORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT [IREDELL COUNTY Roy L. Garris 4 Ve. f JUDGMENT Jane Lucille Garris 4 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor, Je Wil) Pless, Judge presiding and a jury at the January Term of the Superior C Ourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defemant teas b en properly served with procees by publication and the following issues ha Ving been submitted to and answered by the jury, 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully intermarried as al) . *ged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes é. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the state of North Caro) ina for one year next preceeding the bringing of this action? Answer: xes + Have the plaintirr end the defendant lived separate and apart from ther for two years next preceeding the bringing of this action? answer: Yes Now therefore on motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorney for the Plain ‘itt, it 15 ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, Roy L. Garris be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the de‘endant, Jane Lucille Werliie srk ie ie i { it a= EE - ® 5 FRONT (gm sma Noe ro) \ \ aoa . | oa — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Pe K - JANUARY’TERM, 1948 sons. February ana 1a,3 Garris and that the bonds of matrinony heretofore existing between the Plaintig, and the defendant be and they are hereby disolved. And it further appearing to the Court, emd the Court finding ag 4 fact that there are two minor children of the said marriage Roy L. Garris, Jr, age 2 and Peggy Sue Garris age 21 months who have been living with their father, th plaintiff sime the separation of their parents, and it further appearing to t, Court, and the Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit am suitable person to have the custody and control of said minor children, and that the best interest of the said chilcren will be served by being in the custody of the said father. It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be and he is hereby grante; full and complete custody and control of said minor children until the further order of this Court. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 2 day of February, 193. Je Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding WE REE EET Te ETE EERE EEE Noe 435 Hazel Munday Campbell DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanell: answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Vs. Offie P. Campbell NORTH CAROLINA ; is IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR 0 JANUARY TERM, 1948 Hazel Munday Campbell {4 Vs. -— — — oe oe Offie ©, Campbell 1. Did the pleintitr and the defendant intermarry as sllezed in the Complaint? Answer, Yes, Zs Has the plaintirr been @ resident of the State of North Caroliné year next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer, Yes. for more than one 3- Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they liv? Separate and apart for a Period of two ye *rs or more as alleged in the Complait Answer, Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR CcouRT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 198 Monday, February 2nd, 1944 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TER, 1948 Hazel Munday Campbell {4 i. ' JUDGMENT offie P. Campbell This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Term, 1948 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having m swered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; and it appearing to the Court that there was born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant s child, William P, Campbell, and that the plaintiff herein has the care and custody of said child; and it further appearing to the Court and the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and con- trol of the minor child, William P, Campbell, and that the best interest of saic minor would be served by being in the custody of his mother, she being found to be a fit person for the custody of s&id minor. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, end the same arg hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby grarted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Hazel Munday Campbell, be and she is hereby awarded full and complete care, custody and control of the minor child, ‘illiam P. Campbell. This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, 1s retained for further orders. This the 2 day of February, 1948. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding BEDE TEBE Te ESSE EERE DERE IE HE Hb ae SEE TERE TE HE HE ESE SE SESE SE ESE He ee ——— IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February 2nd, 194% No. 4437 Goodin Geneva Creason DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empane) leq ™ answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Clyde C. Goodin IN THE SUPERIOR Cour? NORTH CAROLINA JANUARY TERM, 198 IREDELL COUNTY Geneva Creason Goodin Ye. ISSUES Clyde C. Goodin 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry 4s alleged in th. Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been e resident of the state of North Carolin for more than six months next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes. 3- Did the defendant, Clyde C. Goodin, commit adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IKEDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1948 Geneve Creason Goodin {| Vs. t Clyde C. Goodin { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the January Term, 1948 Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judi Presiding, and a jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in the favor of the pleintirr ana against the defendant as fully appears in the record; and it appearing to the Court thet there was born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant two children,namely; Junior Franklin Goodin and Mildred Faye Goodin, ana that the defendant herein has the care and custody of said children; and it further *ppearing to the Court @nd the Court finds #% a fact that the defendant is a fit and suitable control of the minor children, person to have the custody and Junior Franklin Goodin and Mildred Faye Goodin, and that the best interest of said minors would be served by being in the custot) of their father, » adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matri rimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and defendant be, and the same a re, hewby dissolved, and the plaintirr is hereby granted an absolute ai vorce from the It is further ordered d efendant, adjudged and decreed me defendant, Clyde c, Goodin, be, and he ts hereby, awarded full and complete he being founa to be a fit person for the custody of said oT It is, therefore, ordered IN THE SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WEEK- JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February 2nd, 1948 care, custody and control of the minor children, Junior Franklin Goodin and ’ Mildred Faye Goodin. This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor children, is retained for further orders. This the 2nd day of February, 198. Je Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding De ete Fe HAE Te Te ie Hee St TE Sh te st Sete 4846 3¢ ae Noe 3s Gordon Inscore DIVORCE VS. The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empane lled answers the issues submit ted to it as follows: Clina S. Inscore NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR couURT Gordon Inscore VBe Clina S. Inscore 1. Were the plaintiff ami the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for one year next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes 3+ Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Gordon Inscore vs. Clina gs, Inscore § This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Je Wil) Pless and a jury County, at the January term of the Superior Court of Iredell and it Sppearing to the court that the defendant has been personally Srved with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and *Nswereg by the jury: in the A. @ the plaintiff and the defendant lewfully married as alleged complaint? Answer: "Yes," @. Has the Plaintiff hean a bona fide resi¢ent of the State of North for one year next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer; "yes," 3 Caroling Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and epart from for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "yes," *8ch other ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, Februury 2nd, 1948 it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Gordon Inscore be and ty is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Clina S. Inscore, ang that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff ang the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. and it 1s further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk. This the 2nd dey of February, 1944. i , : Je Will Pless, Jr, Judge Presiding — DEAE SETE SEE TE Te TE TE ETE Te Te Te HE Fe EEE Te Be He Se He } y NOe bdo Thomas Le Morrison 4 DIVORCE vs. } The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Alize h.Morrison NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDsLL COUNTY Thomas Le. Morrison j v8. ISSUES - Alize kK. Morrison 4} z ( o 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alle ged 4 ~ | in the complaint? in | “Sete Answer: Yes a. x 2. Has the plaintiff been e@ bona fide resident of the State of North .J a = Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? p 4 Answer: Yes ; d+ Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes Now therefore, on motion of Macon M. Simons, attorney for the Plaintiy, p IN THE SUPERIOR CouURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February 2nd, 1948 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Thomas Le Morrison {4 VSe 9 In ic ic Jo i= ptt Iz in Alize Re Morrison i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding and a jury at the January term ¢ the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that defendant has been personally served with process, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfull merried in the complaint? J ried as alleged Answer: "yes." 2. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "“yYes," 3e Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? swer: "Yes. Now therefore, on motion of Macon M. Simons, attorney for the plaintiff, it 1s ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Thomas L. Worrison be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Alize R. Morrison, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk. This the 2nd day of February, 198. Je Will Pless, JY e Judge Presiding Fe SESE Bae SE SE SESE He te eae ETE eae aE HE SE ese aE eae eee — se ns ai nace IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 198 Monday, February 2nd, 1948 ett Holt Ruth Benn DIVORCE Vs The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn ana Ompane leg ‘ answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Lawrence A. Holt, IN THE SUPERIOR court NORTH CAROLINA JANUARY TERM, 1948 IREDELL COUNTY Ruth Bennett Holt VS. Lawrence A. Holt, Jr. 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as Blleged in the Compaaint? Answers Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state of North Carolina for more than one year next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes. 4- Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint! Answer. Yes, NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1948 Ruth Bennett Holt 4 Vs. ‘ Lawrence A. Holt, Jr. 4 This cause coming on to de heard and being heard at the Jmuary Tera, 1948 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding and a jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff and against the de the record; It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved and the plaintirr is hereby granted m absolut divorce from the de fendm te This the 2 day of February, 1948. Je Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding We seth se ee ay WES Ht dete eae TE te thse est te IN THE SUPERIOR couR? SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Monday, February 2nd, 1948 - \ os 4169 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Atlantic Greyhound Corporation, oration .o? * plaintirr, Vs. JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT AND RELEASE Guilford Farmers Cooperative service, Incorporated, a Corporation, Defendant. This cause coming on for a hearing before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding at the January, 1948 Term of the Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing that this action was instituted by the plaintiff torecover damages to one of its buses which was involved in an accident with a truck, belonging to the Defendant, on Highway #6), near Statesville in Iredell County, North Carolina, on the morning of May l, 1946; that in addition to its answer, the Defendant filed a counterclaim in which it sought to recover damages to its truck; it further appearing to the Court from the statement of the Attorneys for the Plaintiff and Defendant that all matters in controversy between the parties, arising upon the pleadings, have been settled; that the Plaintiff coes not choose to pursue its cause of action and desires to take a nonsuit as to its original cause of action; that likewise, the Defendant does not choose to pursue its counterclaim and desires to have its action dismissed; that both parties desire that this Judgment shall operate as a complete release, barring each party from maintaining any future action upon the facts alleged in the pb adings herein; that the Plaintirr has agreed to submit to a voluntary nor- Suit @s to its cause of action, and the Defendant has agreed to submit to a dismissal of its counterclaim, NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DEC'tEED: 1. ‘that the Plaintiff's cause of action against the Defendant be, and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that the Plaintiff is forever barred from instituting or maintaining any future action, based upon the facts ®lleged in its Complaint in this cause. 2. That the Defendant's counterclaim against the Plaintiff be, and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed; that the Defendant is forever tarred from instituting or maintaining any future action, based upon the "Mm? Ond counterelain filed in thie cause. 3+ That the cost of this action be taxed against the Plaintiff. This February 2, 1948. Adang Dea rman & Wtorneys Pe = Winberry y ° ° Sow Je Will eerert Jr. - , ‘ bs —— = , Se SS z ee SSSR TS FRONT A 1 ‘he Gaais 2 Open Court for Judgment cece tO ti IN THE SUPERIOR COURT sEcoMD WEEK -. JANUAR ¥ TERM, 1948 Monday, February 2nd, 1948 NOe yl North Carolina Iredell County In the Superior Court January Term, 1948 Effie L. Morrison, ' Plaintiff = JUDGMENT? Je Se Vernon and C. C. Mizell, Trading as Vernon-Mizell Motor Company, § Defendants ' This cause coming on to be heard befare His Honor J. Will Pless upon motion by the defendants at the January, 1943 Term of Iredell County superior Court, and it appearing to the court that the defendants are not entitled to the relief prayed for in their motion to make the complaint more certain. it is, therefore, ordered and decreed that the motion be denied. The defendants are given fifteen days from this date to file further pleadings in the action. This the 2 day of February, 198. ve Pless, Je residing Judge TTT TE TE Tee Ee eh te Te SE oe Eb Sb ae se tb ae tb ae ce at No. 1076 BREAKING AND ENTERING State It is the judgment of the Court that the defendant be in- vs { prisoned in the state Penitentiary at hard labor for FIVE YEARS. James Mayhew f This sentence is Suspended and the defendant 1s placed on pro- C- bation for a period of FIVE YEARS upon the following conditins: - Thst he pay the cost of this action. 2. That he work regularly and be of good behavior and not any wise violate the law. 4. That he obey such rules as may be imposed for his conduct by the State Probation Officials, Now 42s southern Railway Company 4 Vs. ) We. G. Morris { This case being calendared at the present term, plaintiff moves in onthe pleadings. Motion allowed. No. 455 Ae D. Stewart VS. C. C. shook ‘ A mistrial wes ordered in this case. This Honorable Court takes @ recess until Tuesday Morning, February ” 1943 at 9:30 Oteloe,. ; IN THE SUPERIOR COoUnY SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 19\8 fuesday, February 5rd, 1948 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment Tue sday Morning, February 3rd, 198 at 9:30 O'clock, / No. 423 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY southern Railway Company, a Corporation, § Plaintirr Vs. i FINAL JUDGMENT ee ee W. G. Morris, : Defendant ( THIS CAUSE came on to be heard before His Honor J. Will Pless, IPe, Judge Presiding over the courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District for the Spring Term of 198, and was heard at the January 198 term of Iredell County Superior Court on Monday, February 2, 1943 at h P.M. Plaintirr appeared and was represented by its counsel, Messrs. Scott and Collier, Attorneys at Law, of Statesville, North Carolina, and Mr.. William T. Joyner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, North Carolina. Defendant did not appear and was not repre sented by counsel. With respect to the Jurisdiction of this court over the person of the defendant and with respect tothe jurisdiction of this court to now enter this final Judgment in this cause, the court finds and holds: 1. That defendant is a resident of Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina, and was such resident at the time of the institution of this action, é. That summons was properly issued in this cause of action and that summons and complaint were duly and properly served on defendant in Iredell County on the Sth day of November, 197. 3 That the restraining order issued in this cause on November 5» 1947 ana the notice to show cause upon return of said restkaining order dated November 5» 1947 were duly and properly served on the defendant in Person by proper officer on November 6, 197. he That on the return day of said order to show cause and at the *im and place set forth in said order, to-wit: at chambers at Winston Salem, North Carolina, on November 2), 1947, the defendant, wW. G. Morris, “PPeared before the Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Resident Judge of the 15th Jidieial District, through defendant's retained and duly authorized Counsel, Messrs, Adams, Dearman & Winberry, Attorneys at Law of Statesville, X “et Girolina, and filed a motion in witing which appeere in the recor 0 " this cause stating that counsel for Morris had not had opportunity# es IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY: TERM, 1948 Tuesday, February 3rd, 1948 to prepare a defense in this cause and praying that the hearing on the Order to show cause be extended in order that they, counsel for Morris, might have a further opportunity to prepare a defense. 5. Pursuant to such motion and without objection by plaint Aff, who was present and was represented by counsel at chambers at Winston Salem on the 2th day of November 1947, the Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Judge, signed an order, how in the record of this cause, continuing the return on the motion to show cause and directing that the defendant, W. G. Morris, appear before the said Frank M, Armstrong at 11)30 A. M. on the 16th day of December, 19,7 at chambers at Troy, North Carolina, and show cause, if any he had, why a tempor- ary injuction should not be issued as prayed for by the plaintiff in the complaint, enjoining the defendant from further prosecuting his action pending in tne District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, until the final determination of this action. The said order co nt inued the restraining order then in effect. The aforesaid order was entered, asa result of the motion of Messrs. Adams, Dearman & Winberry, attorneys for defen: ante 6. The original of the aforesaid order was filed in the cause and & copy was duly and properly delivered to counsel for defendant, W. G. Morris, 7+ On December , 197, Messrs. Adams, Dearman & Winberry, attorneys for defendant, W. G. Morris, appeared before the Clerk of the Superior Court of tredell County and sought on behalf of defendant Morris and d@ecured from said Clerk @n order extending until and including December 2), 1947, the time within which defendant W. G. Morris was allowed to answer, demur or otherwise plead in this cause. 3+ Subsequent to December |, 1947, and prior to December 16, 19k7, defendant Morris discharged his North Carolina counsel, Messrs. Adams, Dearman & Winberry, and notified them that they might not further represent him an prevented their Sppearing for him at the hearing on December 16, 1947 which they hed sought and secured for defendant. saia atborneys, Messrs. Adams, Dearman & Winberry, filed motion in this cause on December 16, 197, as set forth in the record of this cause, reciting said discharge by defendant a ane’ praying that they be relieved *s counsel for defendant in this cause+ Upon said motion, order was entered on December 16, record of this cause, 1947, 8 appears in the so relieving them, Je Defendant, efter having 8sOught a continuance of the prior hearin and after having requested and sought &n opportunity to be heard on December, 16, 1947, made nO @ppearance either in Person or by counsel at the hearing ® December 16 On return of the notice to sh Ow cause and filed no affidavits i the cause, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 198 Tuesday, February 5rd, 194.8 10. On December 16, 1947, Honorable Frank M. Armstrong, Resident Judge, signed an order, as shown by the record in this cause, enjoining and restraining defendant until the final adjudication of this cause, from further prosecuting his cause of action then pending in New York, 11. Although counsel for defendant moved for and secured order from the Clerk of the Court of Iredell County extending until December 2h, 1947 the time within which defendant might file mswer or otherwise plead, no answer or other pleading was filed for defendant by said December 2h, 1947, or, even, until the date of this order. The time for filing an answer or other Pleading on the part of defendant has now expired. The allegations of fact contained in the complaint are admitted by the defendant's failure to plead. ‘ere igs no issue of fact presented in this cause. This cause is properly on the trial calendar of the Superior Court of Iredell County and was properly called on said calender this the 2nd day of February, 1948, end 1s properly presented to this court on motion made in open court by counsel for plaintiff for final judgment on the pleadings. The issue here presented to this court is one of las, namely to grant to plaintiff the relief to which plaintiff is entitled upon the unanswered and undenied allegations of the complaint. Upon consideration of the allegations of the complaint this court finds and holds: 1. That this court has jurisdiction of this cause of action and has power and jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed for in the complaint. 2. That the complaint states a cause of action against the defendant and that the plaintirr is entitled to the relief prayed for. 3+ ‘hat plaintiff has established by the undenied allegations of the compla int that defendant's case was solicited in North Carolina Girectly and through agents or runners by defendant's attorneys appearing for defendant in his New York case, contrary to the law and contrary to the public policy of the State of North Carolina. 4. That plaintirr hes established by the undenied allegations of the complaint that the defendant's attorneys have invested substantial sums of money in the securing of defendant's case and in the holding of defendant's Case and they are preparing and proposing to make further substantial invest- ments in defendant's cause of action and that this is contrary to the lew ‘nd public Policy of the State of North Caroline. d+ That plaintirr has esteblished by the undenied allegations of the Omplaint that the defendant has participated in and acquiesced in end has “ted in each of the above state of facts and that each of them threaten i justice and inequity and hardship to the plaintiff if the canse of action lg tried in New York, differing from and far in excess of the additional . *Pense and inconvenience incident to the transportation of plaintiff's et IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Tuesday, February 4rd, 198 witnesses to New York, and therefore threatens plaintiff with Lrreparable injury unless the prosecution of the New York action is enjoined. 6. Plaintiff has established by the undenied allegations of the cop. plaint that the plaintiff would be unable to secure the attendance of importent and much needed witnesses (on the issue of defendant's physical condition) if the case would be tried in New york; that depositions from those witnesses Would ineffectively and inadequately present plaintiff's defense and, therefore, fop that additional reason plaintiff would suffer irreparable injury if the Case show: he be tried in New York. 7+ That the further prosecution of the New York case not Only threaten, irreparable injury to plaintiff but involves important matters of public policy threatening to bring into disrepute and disrespect the administration of Justice in North Carolina and to create lack of confidence in the laws of North Carolina and the enforcement thereof because of the flaunting of the violation of the North Carolina laws and its public policy against solicitation, maintenance ani champerty,. SO. That the course of concuct of defendants Morris and the course of conduct of his counsel (other than the firm of Adams, Dearman & Winberry of Statesville, North Carolina, whom defendant retained for a short period of time and has before this date been discharged) show a complete disregard of and dis- respect for the laws of North Carolina and the Courts and public policy of the State of North Carolina and a disregard of the Gisrespect for due and proper court procedure; that the grant of legal authority by the Federal Employers' Liability Act for the defendant to bring action ageainst the plaintiff in New York does not bestow upon the defendant or hie champertous attorneys the privilege of threatening (without equiteble interference) the perversion of justice or the attacking of the courts and the cumstances so Slarming and undenied alles! of the complaint in this case, five hundred miles from the scene of the injury, fi les aaa ve hundred miles from the residence of the key witnesses, upled wi tha contigent fee contract with counsel and coupled with substantl® movey investments by counsel in securing the int case and epar testimony for trial, in holding 1t and in prep# is s uch @ threat to the administration of justice and 4 thre! IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Tuesday, February 3rd, 1948 to the administration of justice and a threat of the perversion or of the distortion of testimony, that a “suit-transporter" ana his champertous counsel should not be permitted to choose the far removed jurisdiction ag the one in which they will attempt to enjory the fruits of maintenance and champerty; thet rather, the threat growing out of the suspicious transporta- tion, plus the evil financial interest of counsel in the tort claim ia so menacing as to justify a court of equity in requiring that the complaining injured party, who has helped to create the sinister threat, try his case at home and among the people with whom he has lived. ll. That there is a definite threat of irreparable loss to plaintirf and injury to the public and to the administration of justice in North Caroling unless the restraining order heretofore issued remains in force and is made permanent and unless defendant is enjoined from further prosecution of his New York action. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AND DECREED: L. That the defendant and his agents, servants and attorneys, be and they are hereby restrained and enjoined from taking any step to further the prosecution or the advancement of that cause of action brought by or for the defendant and in the defendant's name against the plaintiff in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, said action being entitled w. a. Morris, plaintiff v. Southern Railway Company, defendant, and being given file or docket number "Civ. 41-353" inthe United States Dis- trict Court for the Southern District of New York in New York City. ‘the defendant is further restrained and enjoined from taking any such step for the prosecution of the advancement of said cause of action either directly or through any agent, servant or attorney. é.+ The aforesaid order or injunction and this judgment shall be without prejudice to eny right which defendant may have to bring action in any court within the borders of the State of North Carolina against the plaintirr herein for injuries Sllegedly suffered by defendant while employed by plaintiff. 3 The plaintirr herein is hereby relieved and discharged from any {ability to derendant because of any alleged damages which may have been suffered by defendant by reason of the temporary restraining order issued on November 5, 1947 and/or by reason of the injunction pendente lite issued on December 16, 1947. And the plaintiff and its bondsman, American Surety Company of New York, are hereby discharged and relieved of any liability on t he bonds dated November 5s 1947 and December 19, 197 filed in this cause to cure the payment of such damages as micht be awarded to defen“ant by Pea wa Of the issuance of sais temporary restraining order or injunction Pendente lite respect ively. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Tuesday, February 3rd, 1948 . It appearing from the record in this cause that defendant hag announced and declared "that he expected to be away from Statesville, North Carolina, for a considerable length of time, and that his whereabouts would remain unknown", it 1e fitting end proper that prompt notice of the signing » this Judgment and the entry of this order should be given to persons Other they defendant who appear from the record in this cause to be directly Concerned wit, sy the subject matter of this judgment. Therefore, the Clerk of this Court 18 hen. by ordered and directed to send a certified copy of this judgment by registers United States matl to each of the following persons: (a). The Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southr, District of New York at New York City, New York ( referring to Morris Ve Souther Kallway Co. Civil 41-354) / (b). The Clerk of the Probate Court, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn, (referring to "in the matter of the estate of Robert J. McDonald, decedent, file 68616)". (¢). Mr. Gerald ¥. Finley, Attorney at Law, 545 5th Avenue, Bopough of Manhattan, New York City. (d). Mr. Arnold B. Elkina, Attorney at Law, 545 5th Ave., Borough of Manhatton, New York City. (e) Mr. Chester pb, Johnson, Attorney at Law and Administrator c.t.4. of the Kstate of Robert J. McDonald, deceased, Rand Tower, Minneapolis, Minn. (f). Mr. William 4. DeParcg, Attorney at Law, Rand Tower, Minneapolis, Minn. d+ The plaintiff shad) recover from the defendant his court costs ir this cause expended to be taxed by the Clerk, This the ¢ day of February, 190, Je Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding ab ah abe it ae dese ob edb at ab seas Fe Me ae Fe te de ie te ab db ab / sag Pe sg ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ie The judgment of the Jourt is that the defendant be con- Wm. K. Sadler fined in the common jail of Lredell County for a period y Ps NINE MONTHS, and assigned to work on the roads under the {ots a: supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commiss C-22 state” ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON vs ie Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be im- Roger Ramseur eh Soned in the common jail of tredell County for not lest C-38 cesigm y= MONTHS nor more then EIGHTERN MONTHS, end mia to work at ®ny county jail for such part of the sentence as his service are sttisfactory, otherwise to be ®ssigned to work te under the the sta Highway and Public Works ins of IN tHE SUPERIOR COUR? SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Tuesday, February 5rd, 19k - NO. 43h North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County 0 e Simons Davis, Mrs. Mary T, t Se ht Grace Anderson, Mrs. Katherine a knox, and J. Wesley Jones, Trustees of | the Community Club of and for Statesville, and the Community Club of Statesville, an unincorporated voluntary organization, by and through its President, Miss Ina Anderson 6 6 ‘ Vs. Mrs. Marietta Grier This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor J. Will Pless, Jr. at the January, 1948 Term of Iredell County Supertor Court, and it appear ing to the court that this 1s an action brought under the "Declaratory Judgment Act", for the purpose of seeking instructions from the court as to the dis- tribution of certain funds held by the plaintiffs, as Trustees of the Community Club, of Statesville, N. C. And it appearing to the court that the plaintiffs in this cause are the duly elected and acting Trustees of the Community Club of Statesville, and as such, by virtue of their office, they held title to real estate located on Meeting Street in the City of Statesville. It further appears to the court that they were empowered with the right to sell the said property and were suthorized by the members of the Community Club to gel] and Gispose of the same. it further appears to the court that they have received the sum of $10,400.00 as the purchase price of said property, which funds they now hold intact and seek instructions from this court as tothe distribution of said funds, It further appears to the court that the said Trustees, or their predecessors in title held the said property with the right to sell the same, but thet a Provision was inserted by their predecessors in title, as follows: "In the 6vent the said property should ever be sold or disposed of, the pro- ceeds ‘rising from such sale should be reinvested in and used for the purpose °f promoting, establishing, building or maintaining a Community Club in or near the City of Statesville, under the control and direction of the cestuie que trustant, is its successors and assigns;" that no such building or establishment now maintained or contemplated and that there is not much likeithood that “nother similiar Community Club may be established in or near the City of Statesvilie, It further app ars to the court that part of the funds furnished to Purchase the original Community Club were donated by the American Red Cross, and it was hoped and desired that the American Red Cross should have some space in @ "Y Community building for its activities. - —_ , : ene eee pe 6 = eee “+s pe cee Ne Se NR sng d ae <eessnsinoony ~ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Tuesday, February 3rd, 1948 It further appears to the court that the membership of the Commun tty Club, wishing to carry out the conditions set out in their deed as near as ’ | Ponty have gone on public record as favoring the preserving of the proceeds and boty re the said funds in trust so that they may be later invested in a fully quipped Community Center for the Town and County, with a specific request that room be provided for the use of the American Red Cross. The court finds that saiq intention on the part of the membership is in keeping with the Provision gon. tained in their deed as to the reinvestment of said funds. The court furbher finds that the plaintiffs are indebted to Migs Frances Nicholson the sum of $500.00 for commissions in selling the saia Property and the sum of $150.00 to Scott and Collier for preparation of the papers, con- ferences and for the institution of this action. It is, therefore, ordered and decreed by the court that the plaintiry, in this action be, and they are hereby authorized and directed to pay out of the proceeds on hand, the sum of $500.00 to Miss Frances Nicholson for commissions earned in the sale of said property, and the sum of $150.90 to Messrs. Scott and Collier for their services in mreparing the papers, conferences and the handling of this action. From the remaining funds then on hand, the trustees are directed to invest the said funds in approved statutory securities and to hold the same until such as a publicly promoted, Operated and owned Community Center is developed in the City of Statesville, at which time, if a majority of said trustees approve, then they may donate and contribute the said funds then on hand to be used in erecting, Operating and maintaining such a Community Center. They are directed upon such contribution to make a request that a room be pro- vided for the use of the American Red Cross, The plairtiffs are Suthorized to pay the costs of this action. J» Will Pless, Jr, Présiding Jur TUE th teeth tee seth de sete te sete tbat sete ance IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUARY TERM, 1948 Tuesday, February 3rd, 1948 Vv Noe 4354 NORTH CAROLINA IN SUPERIOR couRT IREDELL COUNTY JANUARY TERM, 1948 Davis Hospital, Inc. Vs. manent, Recs ce'tos’ Estate of Dr. Robert B. Scales, deceased. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Je Will Pless, Judge presiding at the January term, 1948 of Lredell County superior Court, and it appearing to the court that the parties have compromised and adjusted all matters in controversy existing between them, and that the defendant is to pay to the plaintiff the sum Of FIVE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS (5,200.00) and the cost. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintirr have and recover of the defendant the sum of FIVE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,200.00) and the cost of the action, to be paid by the defendant. This the $rd day of February, 1940. Je Will Pless, Jr. BY CONSENT: JUDGE PRESIDING lend, Sowers & Avery Zeb V. Turlington ttorneys for alnt Adams, Dearman & Winberr Ittorneys Tor Defoniant — Mrs. Richard Maetzel néficiary under e Trust in the Will of Dr. Robert B. Scales Pe TET TE eae te ae Be tite ae ee Bete Ue tb Te HE aE aE ESE TE SE Ses Se dE ese EE No. 3064 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL couNTY. C. M. Deaton ‘ v8. f Mooresville Building i and Loan Associat fon 0 To the REPORT Super tor Court of Iredell County: Cap At the November term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North wai the Court ordered Ae We Colson, Liquidating Trustee, to file final would ene in the above matter at the January Term, 1948. The undersigned unab] respectfully show that A. w. Colson, Liquidating Trustee, has become Ville. : k and to give attention to the business of liquidating the Moores- inst Building and Loan Association because of blindness caused by cataract and as the undersigned to make demand upon those owing the Liquidating Trustee folloes Demand has been made for immediate payrent and as result of demand the wing collections have been made: $ 15.00 10.00 36:00 27-58 A. We. Colson, cash formerly collected Beatrice Harris James R. Walker Mrs. Margaret E. Billings We. H. McGraw eae _ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - JANUAR? TERM, 1948 Tuesday, February 5rd, 1948 75200 ber 22 Vanderburg eee. 29 Vanderburg 660.00 December 2 et Pa 1948 : NO« Yb J. D. Brown $2 te f North Carolina ee ies Bruce Vanderburg .00 : January Bruce Venderburg ane F Iredell County January Beatrice Harris 7.59 January 1 9 12 14 January 17 Mrs. Billings 17.00 19 19 27 20 January 15.00 Ae Be Wilson, Administrator of nae Re — 274-02 Marie Wilson, deceased January Bruce Vanderburg 20.00 a Jamary Je Price Caldwell 3.00 January 31 Willis Rhodes 7256 TOTAL: Be, O96 he Southern Railway Company Respectfully submitted, This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Zeb V. Turlington the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon the petition of the defendant Attorney HATE Lee Te MEET SETS FER TE ee TE TEE herein for the removal of this cause to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina; ana it appearing to the Court that Albert Earl Jones vs Norman Gibbs Riley Jones--- Continued Leole Bratton Heath vs James H. Heath--- Continued the defendant has filed petition and bond in due form anc according to law, Edwerd Duff vs:“acybell Duff --- Continued : John Mathis vs Gas lah ine W. Mathis --- Continued and has given notice to the plaintiff as by law lena Leazer vs Joe Leazer --- Continued . Maxine C. Ward vs Laban &. Ward --- Continued the Court from an examinationof the complaint and the petition for removal Willi Marti Willia Eugene Martin --- Continued 7 ete an Seman = Bell — regi that the defendant is entitled to said removal; Fred 0. Catskaddon vs Maude F. Caskaddon --- Continued Carl G. taylor vs Ruth L Taylor --- Continued Murtte Daughty vs Mary F. Daughty --- Continued George L. Dickson vs Frances M. Dickson --- Continued be removed from the Superior Court of Iredell County to th ~h43d- Marvin k, Uwens vs. Hezekiah Hambright --- Continued 4360- G. L. Wilson Bldg. Co. Inc. vs Ross McElwee --- Continued District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 4473- Western ‘'extile Co. Inc. vs G & M Motor Transfer Co. --- Continued ee titd -4U377- Mrs. Grace Wood vs Rimrer's Incorporated et al - Vontinued io On. 4400=- Ge. 4, Wilson Building Co. vs Statesville Knitting Co. --- Continued SP= 3254- Robt M. Burns & wife vs Geo. F. Couch & wife --- Continued This 28 day of Jenuary, 198. > and it further appearing to It is now ordered upon motion of the defendant that said action 6 United States &s prayed for in Ce. Ge. Smith Clerk Superior Court 4 DEERE TE TE SEE Sb ae Lede te SESE SESE SE te sesh ese Wb sete sete te Now 373 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY Western Textile Co. Ine. Plaintirr Vs. G & M Motor Transfer Co. Defendant. ‘ te ¢@use coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable * Se Smith, Clerk of the Supe t rior Court of Iredell County and it appearing above econ t tand the Court finding as a fact that the defendant in the tled action, has returned to the plaintiff the following goods which “re the subject of this action. 2h dozens La @ dacene ys toe _— And that the lement of aia cane @& the said goods constitutes an adjustment and matters ard betwe the plaintiff and defendant, ting on the pleading, things between P therefore, by consent it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that th actin’? ROthing by this action, and that the plaintiff pay the cost Ne This the 2) Gay of February, 193. C. Ge. Smith Con ae erk o peria@ court, nted and Agreed to Iredell Co. ery i A Ras rps cl FRONT —~ — Ps one Land, Sowers & Avery By Isaac T. Avery, Jre Mtceney Tor the plate tit Raymer & Raymer By D. Le Raymer Rhcosney Tor the Derendant $b Bee eae eee ae tee ee FE ab Se ae SE ae ob ab Te Gee teak 6 Hb tb Sete te tb ab tb te te ae No. 43472 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CourT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Sylvester Campbell { Vs. 4 JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Doris Campbell { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, It 1s therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this case be and the same 1s hereby nonsuited and dismissed. It is therefore ad judged by the Court that the plaintirr pey the cost of this action. This the 25th day of February, 19h. C. Ge. Smith Clerk of Superior Court tet Ub tee tb te te ab sb se oe ck eae ie te th 2p TESA Re He teat Tb Sb Se tb tb te tb tb se at ae NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK O. R. Mills, trading as Mills Electrie Shop Va. ; JUDGMENT John M. Gaither This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Supertor Court ’ and it appearing to the Court that this fction on claim and delivery, * the return on the process by the Sherif! ot taken by him; * adjudged by the Court that the action be ard same is hereby non-sulted and di the Costs, [t is therefore, Ordered an This the 25th day of February, 19hd. C. G. Smith oF SAMO NUNC ORO RRORE HURON EERE Clerk Super tor 06 emissed, and the plaintirr is texed "4 4 NOe 419 NORTH CARLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK M. & Je Finance Corporation 4 Vs. { JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Leonard Prestwood ’ THIS c@use coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsult. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this case be and the same is hereby nonsuited and Gismissed. It ig therefore ad judged by the Court that the plaintirr pay the cost of this action, This the 25th day of February, 198. C. Ge Smith Clerk of Superlor Court ME Te he Bh Hh ik ae th Bb Sb tb tt tb te ate Hb He sb a8 ab se 4h 44 2 WEE TET HE TE HE LEE SE aE aE Sb Se te te de 5s Noe 4285 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPEKIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CIERK Carl C. Childers 4 Vs. 4 JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Myrtle Canter Childers ‘ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, ‘nd 1t appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a volun- tary nonsuit, it te tle refore ordered and ad judged by the Court that this case be and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed. It is therefae Sdjudged by the court that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action. This the 25th day of February, 198. Ce Ge. Smith erk of Superior Cour TEA ib Rb tte tb ab at eth Ho ab dS de ste Se eH ae bE HE aE a Tete Heth te te te Pa \ ie olilep Hie lie hiL—) aioe Ps ey on 6 r FRONT Wome ee — 7 By bee al vn ‘ } oN Wo] ee eee ane No. 219 IN THE SUPERIOR cor? NORTH CAROLINA, BEFORE THE CLERK IREDELL COUNTY. Dwight S. York i Vs t JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Mary P. York ‘ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, ana it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this case bh and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed. It is therefore adjudged dy the Court that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action. This the 25th day of February, 19)8. Ce G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court Atty for Plaintiff Re Ae Collier Be ote thse te bat HE TETE TE TERE Te Hb Se He The ae Be TET Te FEE Sb SE Sb eb bb ee Noe 27h NORTH CAROLINA IN THY SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK Ralph H. Foulks { Vse } a 1 JUDGMENT Thad W. Reece { This cause coming on to be heard andbeing heard before the under- signedClerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has never been served with summons, and that the plaintiff now desires to take a voluntary non-suit; It 1s therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be and the same ts hereby dismissed and nonsuited, and that the plaintiff be taxed with the cost. This the 26th day of February, 1918, C. G. Smith Clerk Super or Cow land, Sowers & Avery By Isaacc T.Avery, Jr, tt st “TEE ete te este ae dese doe ante ag Sete ab th ete eee _— ie ea ee Ss ee —_— NOe 420 NORTH CAROLINA, In the superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk Pe. Se West, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Mrse Grace Wood, trading as the Vanity Shoppe, eS. S>:lC lhl Defendant. It appearing to C. &. Smith, Clerk of the Supertor Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, fromthe statement of Scott and Collier, and Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys fr the plaintiff, ana J. G, lewis, Attomey for the defendant, that this is an @jectment action relating to the premises known as No. 108 North Center Street, in the City of Statesville, North Carolina, and that the defendant, has now vacated the premises and delivered the same up to the plaintiff, and has paid all of the rent that was due, and the plaintiff and defendant desire that a vol- untary nonsuit be entered in this ection. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED upon the motion of Scott and Collier, and Adams, Dearman and Winberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, and by and with the consent of the defendant, that this action be, and the same is hereby nonsuited and this action dismissed, and that the cost of this action be taxed by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County against the defendant. This the 26th day of February, 1938. Ce Ge Smith erk o uperior Court o Iredell County Consented to: Scott & Coll ler Adams Dearman & Winberr Kttorneys Tor the Petar? Je 3. Lewis Kttorney Tor the Defendant FE Be See oe eM Ae Shae Tae ee Hb Se See SESE HSE Se Th SESE ETE SE SESE HE Ee SESE aE EE ESE * ne a aE ae oe - bee > + “A = a le en ee ae ee ee ” a aids teas ett en 2 it) - aed eee =~ 25° 3 Se persesss =. cnt 2S ee Se Lee ¢ = sae 5 Ae > RL eee <r TR, ee ae Sead em ei TSS ae =—~ Vy Ve FRONT Wom Te ETE £ Ws eR OeeNTe nnd, ? shes hen i 7 + 2 ae ~\ - — Noe 4375 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR court IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Du-Rite Products Co. Inc. ™ JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Eugene Fraley and James Fraley T/A Fraley's Food Fair, a Partnership This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and tt appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this case be and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed. It is therefore adjudged by the Court that the plaintirf pay the cost of this action. This the 26th day of February. Ce Ge Smith Clerk Superior Court Bree ETE Te eb tee te eae VOTRE Ub ee Hh te He Me EE AE ab 5b bE He Hee Now 3795 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Kermit Groce { Vs. 4 JUDGMENT Thurman Myers ¢ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appeari ng to the Court that this i 8 &n action on claim ang delivery, and that the return on the process by the Sheriff shows that the property ask for was not taken by him; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the action be and the same is hereby non-suited an d dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. This the 26th day of February, 19,8, Ce G. Smith Clerk Superlor Court ahahaha eee TT TTT TTT eT ere Sb dest teat Noe 3652 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Me & Je Finance Corp. : Vs. 4 JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT K. Le Nash 4 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsult. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this case be and the same is hereby nonsuited and Gismissed. It is therefore ad judged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action. This the 26th day of February, 198. C. Ge Smith erk Superflor Court Bie te Seles te it the He CURSE te te tiie SESE ee ae Ee Us HE se He Noe yh25 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE CLERK Be. Je Powell § Vs. JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Statesville Knitting Mills, Inc. 9 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of IredellCounty, North Carolina, and it “ppearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary nonsuit, It is tle refore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this case be and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed. It is therefore adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action. This the 26th day of February, 1918. C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court EE SEE ERG Te TERE SE ERE TE SE Hk SE NE SE SE EE SE HE SEE SESE TE HE Sb SE HEE SE ee a ee ee “erty ~ No. 4380 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY BEFORE THE CLERK G. Le Wilson Building Company V8- JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Statesville Knitting Compm y This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under. signed Clerk of the Superior Court of /redell County, North Carolina, ana it appearing to the Court that the plantiff desires tot ake a voluntary nonstit. {t 1s therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that this case be and the same is hereby nonsuited and dismissed. it is therefore ad judged by the Court thet the plaintiff pay th cost of this action. This the 26th day of February, 1948. Ce Ge. Smith Clerk Superior Court Be ee SeSb Sede e bee eae te Seats ThE Be de De ETE SE eb Hee est Se ib Sb SESE ab 4b 58 ce ee Noe 07 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. COUNTY OF [RED LL. Fe. E. Cox and P. B. Fayton, | Trading as Cox Motor Co. j Vse t JUDGMENT Coyt N. Benfield, This cause now being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the above Court. It appearing from the information given by the attorney for the plaintl!! ii vemes Ke Burgess that the same day this action in Claim and Delivery was institi bhe defendant came in and paid the amount due the plaintiffs together with t cost. That all matters between the parties are now adjusted, “t 1s therefore ordered that this action be and the same is hereby dismissed and the plaint ifs taxed with the costs. This the lst, day of March, 1948. C. Ge Smith , “Clerk BF the Supertor com" Hibs ete seep sese aes ee Set SESE Ae et tte te tte bt ah a8 stab ae sede ae ste sede deedeaaaeaeaede sede IN THE SUPERIOR couRT MARCH TERM, 1918 Monday, March &th, 1948 IN THE SUPERIOR coury MARCH TERM, 198 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County eforesaid, on the sth day of March, 19,8, a. D., when and where His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the Fifteenth Judicial District March Term, 198, is present and presid- ing. W. D. Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this the March Term, 1948, Iredell County Superior Court, to-wit: C. ki. Barger (Mrg) Robert L. Calcwell T. Re Lowtharpe Miss Lucile Connelly Woodrow W. VanHoy Miss Rackel McKay Re P. Craven R. D. Wallace C. He. Beaty H. Paul Brantley J. Me. Templeton F.C. Nesbit We Je Wright Frank Brenner He Be. Sellers W. S. Hunter Kk. Clayton Cartner Ge He McGee Victor W. Walton D. F. Campbell Frank Déaton Mrs. Je M. McKee M. M. Earley He D. Howard Ce E. Barger, Mrs. J. M. McKee and H. DPD, Howard, erycused on Doctor's Certificate, Mrs. Robert L. Caldwell, was not served Je Me. Templeton, out of the County The following men constitute what shall hereinafter be termed the " _ Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: Miss Lucile Connelly, Rk. P. Craven, H. Pen Brantley, We Je Wright, w. Ss, Hunter, Victor w. Walton, Woodrow W,. VanHoy, R. D. Wallace, F Tenk Brenner, K. Clayton Certner, D. FP. Campbell and G. H. McGee. No. Lh) Edna Williams Martin q DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn end empaneélled answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Vs. ( “liam kugene Martin 9 STATE OF NoRT HC LI 3 TP pT; ' " COUNTY OP mEDETD TNA IN THE SUPERIOR COUR’ Edna Williams Martin, j yieintirr, wy 8 W11liam Eugene Martin, Defendant, 0 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the Complaint? Yea, ther fon e+ Had the plaintiff and defendant lived separate end apart from each on oe two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? 6s. © plaintiff resided continously in the State of North Carolina than Se (6) months next before the starting of this suit? Se for more er ery Eaireveniian nt atte ® VU a 4 be z © Le k 0 a IN THE SUPERIOR CCURT MARCH TERM, 198 Monday, March dth,19)8 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY 0} IREDELL. MARCH TERM, 19h, Edna Williams Martin, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT { 4 Williem kugene Martin, Defendant. ( This cause now being heard before 4is Honor J. Will Pless, Judge presiding at the above term of the said court: It appearing to His Honor thet this case was properly brought and try and thet the proper issues were submitted to the said Jury. That all of ther were answered in favor of the plaintiff. {t is therefore, Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed, thet the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the above parties are hereby declared Gissolved, anc the absolute dwree prayed for by the plaintiff is hereby tranted. This oth. day of March, 1943. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding eto hte te ete Sb re Dott se ee Now Uldh Carl Graham Taylor arena LIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and e mpanelled enswers the issues submitted to it as follows: Vs. Kuth Le. Taylor ee ee 1N THE) SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNT MARCH TERM, 198 Carl Graham Taylor Vs. Ruth L. Taylor 1. Dia p ld the plaintiry fnd the defendant intermarry as e lleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes “+ Has the plaintirr been p resident of the State of North carolis for more t} “™n one year next Preceding the filing of the Complaint? Answer, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 198 Monday, March oth, 19\% NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 19)8 Carl Graham Taylor {4 Vse 0 Ruth Le Taylor i This cause coming on to be heard ana being heard at the March, 191.8 Term, Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having answered all the issues sub- mitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff ane against the Ceferdant, as fully appears in the record; It 1s, therefore, @ dered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, hreby dissolved and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute civorce from the defendant. This the oth day of March, 190. + ve Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding. Se SESE SESE SE dle Se sede se see she et Noe Ui50 George Linford Dickson Plaintiff Vs. DIVORCE The Divorce Jyry #1" being duly sworn end empanelled answers the issues submitted to Frances Moore Dickson it as follows: Defendant. NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE t SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. Februery “erm, 19d. seorge Linford Lickson Plaintirr Vs. Frances Moore Dickson 4 f f 1. “ere the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, as ®lleged in the Comple tint? A. Yes 2. Hae the pleintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months nevt preceding the bringing of this action as slleged in the Complaint? A. Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and epart from 8 ach Other for t wo years next before the bringing of this action, as Allege@ 'n the Complaint? a, yes enaeesce pemeversmmnreanse ee FRA NO NE ar ae N h G a is - z & Le — a = ig A . { IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1948 Monday, March Uth, 1948 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPHRIOK CouRt, NORT A si N IREDELL COUNTY. February Term 19hu. George Linford Dickson Plaintiff Vs. JUDGMENT Frances Moore Dickson Defendant. This cause coming on to be heurd, and being heard before hie Sis Je Will Pless, Judye Presiding, and a Jury, at the March Term, 19,4, of tredell County superlor Court, the following issues were submitted to and found by the Jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant murried to each other, a8 alley in the Complaint? Ae Yes. ee Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carollaa for six months next preceding the bringing of this action, 4s > allged in the Complaint? Yes. Se Have the plaintiff on defendant lived separate and apart from for two years next before the brinviny of this action, as alleged Complatnt? Yes. “FORD, on Motion Of Tresste Plerce Fletcher, Attorney for he pl { t rs 1A: Tee c 4 as the plat: iff, considered ind adjudged that the bonds of matrimony now existis between plaintiff and defendant, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, ant ’ the nolaty 4 hareh ; ; plaintifs Ss nereby ranted an Absolute divorce ORDERED, that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, to be taxed by Je Will Pless, Jre Judge Presiding. Statesville, N March Term, 1 Wyo March ig, LILY. IN THE SUPERIOR court MARCH TERM, 198 Monday, March uth, LyY ’ NO« 453 Holmes Jones sue DIVORCE e. The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empAnelled answers the issues submitted to tt as follows: James Ve Jones NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPSRL OR couRT MARCH TERM, 198 Sue Holmes Jones Vs. James V. Jones 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant merry each other, snd are they now husband and wife, as allewed in the complaint? Answer Yes ee. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and heve they lived together end apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes de Has the plaintiff heen a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as alieged in the complaint? Answer Yes KTH CAROLL NA, {HED LL COUNTY. “U6 Holmes Jones V8. James V, Jonas This cm se coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Sunert, uperlor Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J. P ) tl] Pless, Judye Presiding, and a jury, and the Jury havinz answered the { ; Sues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, 4s set out in the record: {t is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of mat rimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Sue Holmes Jones, and the defendant, James \V, Jones be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaint ; iff ts granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding Whe ee We ik eMe dese sb se de sede ee se ek te eset He IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1948 Monday, March doth, 1948 Noo 45) n Sain jlenn Neil Sa DIVORCE Vs The Divorce Jury #1" being duly Sworn and : empanelkd answers the issues submitted to Kuby Klizabeth McDade Sain, it as follows: In the Supertlor Court March Term, 1948 NORTH CAROLINA, [IREDELL COUNTY. Glenn Neil Sain, Plaintiff, VSe huby Elizabeth McDade Sain Defendant. 1. Did the plaintiff, Glenn Neil Sain, md the defendant, Ruby Elin. beth Mclade Sain, intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? ANSVER Yes. ee Have the plaintiff, Glern Neil Sain, and the defendant, Ruby Elizabeth McDade Sain, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecutive years immedtately prior to the commencement of this action? ANSVER Yes. 4- Has the pla intiff, Glenn Netl Sain, been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the comme: ment of this action? ANSWER Yes, IORTHY CAROLINA, In the Superior Court (he: DhALL COUNTY, March Term, 190 tleann Neil Sain, Plaintirr, q VS. Ruby Elizabeth McDade Sain, { Defendant, ' This cause coming on tobe heard, and being heard by His Honor J Wil) Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding, and a Jury sat the Merch Term, 198, Superior 4 , \ r Cr Y Court of lre jell /Ounty, North Carolina, and the following i - submitted to ana Answered by the jury to-wit: , - 1. Did the plaintirr bilizabeth Me Dade Sain, intermarr ANS"ER Les, Glenn Nei] Sain, and the defendant, Kuby y 4s alleged in the complaint? <+ Have the Llizabeth Menade sain, Plaintirr, g Cars immediat NS WER Ye lenn Neil lived S@parate and a ®ly prior to 5e Has 5 lai . : of the State of North iris ~ aan Ness méncement of this action? ANS MER Ye . Sain, been a bona fide resident for six months immediately preceding the com IN THE SUPERIOR CouR? MARCH TERM, 1948 Monday, March dth, 15.8 The Court finds that summons in this action was duly served on the defendant, Ruby Elizabeth McDadg¢, by W. P, Johnson, a Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, on the 6th day of January, 193, The Court further finds fromthe affidavit of Glenn Neil Sain, the plaintiff, that Kuby Elizabeth McDade Sain, the defendant, was not, at the time of the institution of this action, its now now, nor has she been since the institution of this action, in the military service of the United States of America. IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREF D that the bonds of matrimony heretofore 6yisting between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are, dissolved, and that the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Let the cost of thls action be paid by the plaintiff. This the Uth day of March, 19). Je Will Pless, Jr. Judge Prestding weet ete ete ele ot ae Be OE Bee FE Keld Messick DIVORCK V36 The Divorce Jury #1" betng duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to Johnsie Wigzins Messick it as follows: NORTH CARKOLI NA, IN TH: SUPERLOR COURT. [REDELL COUNTY, MARCH TERM, 198. Keld Messick Vse Johnsie “igeins Messick le Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, anda re they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? answer: Yes, 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived S@parate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institution of this action, as alle ged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3¢ Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of N . th Carolina for more then six months hefore the commencement of this an tion, as ®lleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. GUE TN ; < = =S Z = < 74: i 7 an , eal Cy | g q = es SSS SS eres =~ Piel ih Seal ‘sae FRONT —~ ! IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1948 Monday, March oth, 1948 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, March Term, 198, Iredell County. c » 19) Reid Messick t Vs q cUDGMEND? Johnsie “igeins Messick This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of th Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, befare His Honor, Jd, Wil) Pless, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having ™ swered the iesws submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It 1s, therefore, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaint iff, Reid Me ssick, end the defendant, Johnsie Wiggins Messick, be, and the same are hereby disso and the plaintiff is granted an absolute diwrce fromthe defendant, Je Will Pless, Jr, Judge Presiding. Noe 4157 Gladys Powell Washington | DIVORCE VS. 4 The Divorce Jury #1" being duly swornand empanelled answers the issues submitted to Xoland T. Washington Q {t as follows: NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1948. Gladys Powell Sashington { Vs. { Roland T. Wash ington Q 1, Did the plaintirr ana defendant marry each other, and are the! now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, ee Did the plaintirr and defendant separate, and have they lived © and apart from ®&ch other for tion of this action, se parat ti: maré than two years prior tothe inst! 4s alleged inthe complaint? Answer: Yes, 8s Alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOK COURT MARCH TERM, 19)8 Monday, March 8th, 198 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, Gladys Powell Washington 4 VS ( JUDGMENT Rolend fT. Washington This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the Jury having enswered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and agal nst the defendant, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, end adjudged by the Court that t he bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Gladys Powell Washington, and the defendant, Roland T,. Washington, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Je Will Pless, Jr, Judge Presiding NORTH CAROLINA, Inthe Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY. March Term, 198, Gladys Poweil Washington d Vs. { ORDER FOR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN Roland ', Wa shington 0 This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, J+ W111 Pless, Judge Presiding, at the March Term, 1948, Superior Court for Irede11 County, North Carolina, and it @ pearing to the Court, end the Court finding as a fact: 1. That three minor children, namely:Donald Washington, age 17 years; Iris Washington, age 13 years; and Joe Washington, age 24 years were born to the marriage union between t he plaintiff and defendant. 2. That the said minor children are now living with their mother, the Plaintiff, and have lived with and been supported by their mother, the Plaintire, Since the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on the lst da of December, 195. de And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as ® fact, that theplaintiff isa fit and suitable person to have the custody 8 nd contro} Of said minor children, and that the best interest of said Chila» Lldren Would be served by being in the custody of their mother. eet ys . Rae ee ct a es a ie IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1948 Monday, march oth, 198 IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff, be, and she is hereby granted full ang complete custody and control of Donald Washington, Iris Washington, and Jog Washington, the aforementioned minor children. 2. This cause is retained for further orders, it further appears to the Court that the ea hove entitled Action was brought by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant on the ground of two yeers separation and for the custody of the aforessid minor children, and that a judgment granting the plaintiff an absolute A1w ree fro: the defendant was granted at the March Term, 1948, of the Iredell County Superiie Court. This the dth day of March, 198. Je Will Pless, Jn, Judge Presiding. WOE ETE Ee TESS TEN Fete Le eb ae ese te ee Tete te ETS TESTE Tete Se He EE eres NO I) ( NU ie YOU Clarence V. Johnson DIVORCE Vse answers the issues submitted to it as follows: Julia rauline Johnson NURTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. = MARCH TERM, 1948 Clarence V, Johnson Vse Julia Pauline Johnson Were the plaintirr ana the defendant married and are now husband and wife, as set Out in the Compkint ? Answer Ye 3 II Plaintirr been a resident of Iredell County, North Carolin months int Clately vrior to the filing of the Complaint? Answer Yes ITI Has the Pleintirs, Clarence | 5. Johnson, lived separate and apart from Julia Tauline Johnson, the defendant ? prior to th g 0 the filing of the complaint in this action? Answer Yes, The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanellé for a period of two years immediate IN THE SUPERIOR Mur? MARCH TERM, 194.8 Monday, March Uth, 1948 North Carolina, In the Supertor Court Iredell County March Term 198 Clarence V. Johnson Vs. Julia Pauline Johnson This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before his Honor, J. Will Pless, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the pleintirr and against the defendant, as set out in the record: It is therefore, ordered ana adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the pleintiff, Clarerce R, Johnson and the defendant, Julie Payline Johnson, be wd the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff ts granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Je “ill Pless, Jr. JUDGE PRESIDING WR I RR Ee NO 4313 Re Me Campbell DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empane lled answers the issues submitted to it @s follows: Johnsie Campbell NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERN, 1948 Re Me Campbell Vse John sie Campbell Did the plaintirr offer such indignities to the person of the defendant as torender her condition intolerable and life burdensome? Answer; Yes Se ee : 3 fe ek Baek i sceatite dee dammit a ee ‘ * q if et aes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1948 Monday, March 8th, 198 IN THE SUPERIOR Go NORTH CAROLINA, URT, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 198, R. M. Campbell, Plaintiff, VSe Johnsie Campbell, Defendant This cause is heard before the undersimed Presiding Judge upon the complaint of the plaintiff in which he seeks an absolute divorce on the ground of two years separation and the cross-action of the defendant in whioh she secks a divorce a mensa et thoro for alleged indignities. After hearing the evidence, with the ald of the jury, the Court was of the Opinion that the parties could not be reconciled and thereupon suggested that an allowance be fixed for the support of the wife and minor child of the parties which should be incorporated in an order of the Court, thereupon ths plaintiff should be allowed to obtain an absolute divorce in accordance with the suggestion of the Court, and, with the consent of counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant the Court then submitted to the Jury the following issue: "Did the plaintiff offer such indignities to the personof the defendant as torender her condition intolerable and life burdensome? Answer: Yes," Upon the verdict and in orcer to effectuate the agreement entered into, the Court then heard evicence as to the income and financial condition of all parties upon which the Allowance hereinafter made is based: LT [S NOW, Upon the verdict of the Jury as shown in the issue set forth @ bove, CONSIDURED, ORDERED AND DECREED That the defendant, Mrs. Johnsie Campbell, be, and she is hereby granted a divorce from bed and board of the plaintiff, and that she be authorized to convey property or conduct any other business transaction in the samé manner as if she had never been married to the plaintiff, she being released from any authority of the plaintiff in her property and in her person, It 1s further ordered and decreed that the plaintiff pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County the sum of $27.59 on or before Saturday, March 20, 19h8 , anda like sumof $27.50 one ach urday thereafter during the life shall be paid by the Alternate Sat \j of this order, which said amour Clerk to Mrs. Johnsie Campbell, or her order, and shall be used by the said Mrs, Campbell for the support of herself and the minor son of the parties, Frank Campbell, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 19) Momay, March uth, 19448 This cause is retained for further orders, and the Court particularly reserves the authority to change the amount required to be paid, by the plaintiff if the circumstances of either of the parties hereto should be materially altered, the Court contemplating the reduction of the amount required to be paid by the plaintiff when the said Frank Campbell shall have arrived at the age of 18 years, if the condition of the parties is substantially similar to their present condition, It 1s contemplated that the plaintirr may hereafter seek an absolute divorce fromthe defendant, and this order is entered by the Court, consented toby the attorneys for the respective parties, in the expection that plaintirr may obtain an absolute divorce, it being agreed that any decree of absolute divorce that may hereafter be entered shell in no wise effect the permancy of the order of support or alimony herein made, but the same shal 1 continue in the same force and effect as if the marital status of the parties had not been changed. This the Sthday of March, 1943, Je Will Pless, Jr, Judge Presiding. By consent: McLaughlin and Hattle Kttorneys Tor Platnture Ray Jennings & Burke & Burke ttorneys for endant. Vee TREES WARE Se ese ete ese se le dese ese se se } mul aut! y Monday, March 8th, 190 COURT VARCH TERM, 198 Monday, March oth, 19) It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds Noe bhh7 of matrimony heretofore existing between the pleintirf ana the defendant be, and they sre hereby dissolved, and that the plaintiff be, Murtte Daught wd _ DIVORCE ‘ Vs. The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and Smpanelleg answers the issues submitted to it as follows: and he ts hereby, granted an absolute dvorce from the defendant. Mary Fisher Daughty NORTH CA [NS IN THE SUPERIOR cour? NORTH CAROLINA IREDALL COUNTY January, 1948, Term + ve Will Pless, Jre Murtte Daughty Judge Presiding Vs. UE TERETE IE TE TENE ETE TENE ETE Te TNE Le He HEME Tab ees de Sede cece tect Mary Fisher Daughty Now 405 Ke Ae Tilley . 1. bid the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged ory oe and ompanelled as follows: ’e. Miss Lucile Connelly, Bs P. craven, He. Paul ibrantley, ie Re ' = QS rH al ‘ ta Wo 1 Y Nandan : —- « —" : LENG, We Se Hunter, victor Wwe Walton, Woodrow in the complaint? a ons VanHoy, R. D. Wallace, Frank Brenner, PD. F. Campbell, nO =e [. Re Lowtharpe and G. H. McGee Ve . Answer: Yes e. Have the plaintiff and the defendmt lived separate and apart Pending trial the Court takes © recess until Tuesday Norning. ~ 5 gel : ee s + alee ne LE —— ee for two years immediately preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes « ghee ae 4- Has the plaintiff been a sident « Ss y in } . i E been a resident of the State of North Carolin Sareh Kinard Howard vs. A. &. Howard, --- Continued “or more than one year ne din a mmne r 3 t ? year next preceeding the commencement of this action? lena Leazer vs. Joe Leazer, -~ Continued answer: Yes Le ©. Bell vs. Mevus M. Bell, --- Continued Mrs. Je A. Honeycutt et al vs. Me a lackey et al, --- Continued Carolina In the Superior Court - - F. Crouch vs. The Southern Railway Co. a Corp, --- Continued County J; x gle erm wy Jvanuary, 1948, Term No. 338- Marvin E. Owens vs. Hezekiah Hambricght,--- Continued laughty Y ner Daughty This cause coming on to be heard at the regular January, 19), Ter of Sup Cour f perior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, mdbeing heard before the undersirpred Jucge presidine 1 ge presiding anc a jury, and the jury having @ swered the following issues submittea 1 as in {cated, and as appears in the record, viz: ] L4¢ : a , ; is id the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in complaint? Answer: ) —@ H se “ave the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for two years immea : mediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: 4 + ag sald separation without fault on the part of the plaintiff? ~ ‘ Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Answer: “arch 9th, 1943 at 9:30 Otelock. 4. Has the he plaintiry been @ resident of Iredell County, North carol!” for more than one ear next pr ion? y preceeding the commem eénment of this act JUDGE PRESIDING IN THE S'YPERIOR COUR! MARCH TERM, 1948 | Tuesday, March 9th, 1946 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment Tue sday Morning, March 9th, 1948 at 9:30 O'clock. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, NORTH CaROLINA, IKEDL.LL COUNTY. K oo A ° Tilley, Pleintiff, VS. We Ce. Poole and Hobert Velener, befencantse 1. Did the defendant, W. C. Poole, wrongfully breach the contract for the sale of the timber in question to the pleintiff, R. 4. Tilley? answer: Yea [f so, what damage is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the Ye Ce. roole? Answer: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 198 Pleintiffr V8e We Cy. Poole ana Hobert VAsner, Deferdants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being meard, before Hig Honor, Ye W111 Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding, end 6 jury and it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted for injunctive relief to restrain the de fendsr' from cutting and remo , ndant, ) itting anc removing certein growing timber on the lands of the defendan We Co Poole; llr ‘ pon the hearing of the 6vidence in the case and upon mot ion for Judgment ag of r . é J t 8S oO] nonsulit, the motion of nonsult at the close of all the evidence was fllowed as to the defendant, Hobert Weisner; The following issues were then submitted to the jury as to th de- nA fendant, Ne Ce Poole, and the Jury enswered the issues ag set out; IN THE SUPERIOR cCouRT MARCH TERM, 198 Tuesday, March 9th, 19)8 1. Did the defendant, W. C. Poole, wrongfully breach the contract for the sale of the timber in question to the plaintiff, Kk. A. Tilley? Answere Yes 2. If so, what damage is tle plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant, Ve C. Poole? Arswere $00.00 It 1s, therefore, orcered, considered, adjudged and decreed that the temporary restraining order heretofore issued in this case be, anc the game is, hereby dissolved and the defendant, We. H. Weisner, 1s declared to be the owner of the timber growing on the lands of W. Ce. Poole as deserlbed in the complaint; It is further ordered, consicered, sdjudged and decreed that the pleintiff have and recover of the defendant, “. C. Poole, the sum of $00.00 with interest from the Oth day of March, 194%, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 10th day of March, 194. Je Will Pless, JY. Judge Presiding 9b te 5e25 Curtis Vs. Koy Bumgarner & wife hathryn Bumgarner ft 1s stipulated and agreod that the presiding Judge may hear the @vicence and find the facts in the matter without the intervention of pa jury Thi March 10th, & Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesdey Mom ing, 1943 at 9:30 O'clock. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1948 Wednesday, March l0th, 1948 This Honorable Court convenes sccording to adjournment Wednesday Morning, March 10th, 194d at 9:30 O'clock. NOe bdy22 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CouR?, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 1948. Jo F. Curtis, Vs. Koy Bumgerner end "“ife, Kathryn Bumgarner. This cause was heard before the undersigned Judge without the inter- vention of a jury upon the apreement of plaintiff ane the defendant that the Court could hear the evidence and find the facts, and state his corclustons of léw #rising thereon. after hearing the evidence of witnesses forth plaintiff and the defendant, the Court finds the following facts: The defendant contracted with the plaintiff for the erection of 8 five-room house in Mooresville, N. Ce, in June, 196, a writter. contract beirz executed between the parties, and e plan for the said house was incorporated Dy refererce in the said contract, The contract price for tle house was $30). and the defendant has paid to the plintiff, or to laborers and material supzlle for which he is entitled to crecit on the saia contract the sum of §$2630025. he Court, acting in the cepectty of a jury, finds as e fact thet, in addition to the requirements of the contract, the plaintiff furnished extras coneistin of both ' - ' of both lsbor and material of the value of #75.0). The Court further finds h) , , . A : that the plaintiff fe not fully complete the s aie contract, and, because of hie fafiun han : } his falure to co so, the Court finds that the defendant has expended, or will he reguired tc eypend, the sum of ef veeheU0, the net effect of said finding delé that the plaintirr ts entitled to recover &n additional $250.00 over ae the original contract price of ©3000.00, or a total of $4050.00. That upon ‘educting the em Cunt heretofore peid of $2638.25, the plaintiff is entitké to recover herestafore ypaidryoar Jpon the hearing it Speers that there are outstanding claims for labor and matertal used in the construction of the s aid dwelling, md that the amount tn unts clatred will probably erceed the amount recovered by the defendant in this action, It is now, ordereé upon t he foregoing findings of fact, considered, and decreed ®8 follows: "82630225 the difference between the two sums, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 19% Wednesday, March 10th, 19\u le That the plaintiff, J. F. Curtis, have and recover of the defendants, Roy Bumgarner ard wife, Kathryn sumgerner, the sum of $1411.75, with interest fromdate until paid, snd the cost of this action. 2. That the plaintiff, or those entitled to the proceeds of the amount herein awarded, shell have s lien upon the premises described in Para- graph 3 of the compleint as security for the payment a said sume 4%. That the defendants are authorized to pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County the sum required in Item 1 of this decree, and that upon said payment they and the premises in question and the lien thereon shall be fully end finally 4 lecherged anc released from any claim of the plaintiff or from any claim for material or labor furnished on or prior to July l,, 1947. 4Ye In the event the amount so paie is suffictent to fully pay the liens or claims of laborers and materialmen, t he surplus, if any, shall be paid to the plaintiff, J. t. Curtis, end in the event it is not suffictent to pay the same, the same shall be peid in the orcer of priorities, if which the claimants are entitled, with the balance tobe distributed among the claimants. Qe in the event the amount required of th peid into the office of the Clerk on or before Mare} thet the said property be edvertised ari sold in the same ménner under @ defaulted mortgage or ceed of trust, the Court here by appointing T Je Re Burgess as co-missioner for the purpose of conducting the saic sale and applying the proceeds in accordance with the other provisions ofthis judgment, with any surplus over and above the amount required in this jucgment to be paid to the defendants herein or to Citizens Buileing & Loan Association at Mooresville, N. C, &s their interest may eppear. This the 10th day of Merch, 19d. Je Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presicing. ‘ . » . Tere ee eT ee eT Tee re RRB Ra ce ee ee ee ee ee ee 7 eK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1948 Wednesday, March 10th, 198. No. 4412 lia NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPLERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 198 C. Ee Barger and Le Young White, Trading as Barger Bros. Vse 7U 0G Ba a ft. Roy Bumgarner and Mr. Roy Bumgarner This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, J. Wil) Pless and being heard ane it appearing that this action ts on a claim for materials furnished in the erection of a house for the defencents: and it further appearing that a judgrent has been rendered in the case of J, F, Curtis vs. Roy Sumgarner and Katherine Bumgarner wherein the funds therein recor by the pleintiff be paid into the office of the Clerk of the Court and paid pro rata on all claims filed according to their priority. it is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs in this action take from the said funds as their pro rate rights or priorities appeer sn that the cost of this action be peid from the funds recovered by the plaintiff in the case of J. F. Curtis vs. Roy Bumgerner ard wife Katherine Bumgarner before any distribution is mede under the judgmert in the Curtis case. Je Will Pless, Jr. JUDGE PRESIDING. Melese sete se aT . how iDNe ULL6 NORTH CAROLI A, nT . TTDI TCR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COU! . rawr r AArriarm LRED: LL COUNTY, Effie +, Morrison. Vs. Jury sworn and empsnelled, as follows: T. Re Lowtharpe, Lucile Connelly, Re. ?. Craven, i. Paul Brantley, wW. S, Hunter, Woodrow W. VanHoy, Ke C. Cartner and w, H, Wright. Je Se Vernon and Ce C. Mizell, Trading as Vernon-Mizell Motor Company. > > <= ISSUE. “hat was the reasonable market value of the 1947 Dodge Sedan on September 5» 19,72 Answer: 565,00 Me karly, Rachel McKay, C. H, Beatty, Fe Ce Mite IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 19148 Wednesday, March 10th, 1948 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPLRIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Effie +. Morrison, Plaintiff. Vse Je Se Vernon and C, C. Mizell, Trading as Vernon-Mizell Motor mpany — ' Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge, anda jury, at the March Term, 198 of Iredell County Superior Court, and a jury having answered the issue submitted to them, that the car turned over to the defencants by the plaintiff had a reasonable market value of #565-00 on September 5th, 197, and the parties both have edmitted in open courd that the mortgage and paint job amounted to 8277.00, which should be cecucted from the market value of the car, leevinz a balance Gue of g2d0.0U, with interest from September 5th, 1947, until pata. it is, therefae, ordered, adjudged anc decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $200.04, with interest from date, at the rate of six per cent per é@nnum and that they be taxed with the costs of this &ction. Je Will Pless, Jr. Presiding Judge. re B, “eyton, Jr. and F. Ee Cox, T/A Cox Motor Company 1. 144 the Cefendant's contract and agree torepair plaintiff's automobile for the sum of $75.00? Answer, Yes, e, it not, what was the reasonable value of the repairs made to the Plaintitr's car by the defendant? Answer: Pty <2 Hers, eines ot wees 4 a. ') Li c (Gea I , } wd a : c Gite Set dS ae ee a ee em ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Mach Term, 198 Wednesday, March 10th, 1948 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR Court IRFDELL COUNTY MARCH TERM, 19,8 Janes T. Rankin Vs JUDGHENT P, B. Peyton, Jr. and F. Ee Cox, T/A Cox Motor Compm y This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honop J. Will Pless, Jr., Judge Presiding anda jury end it appearing from the O@videnes and the pleadings that the plaintiff is theowner of the Chrysler automobile ies. eribed fn the complaint and that the possession of said automobile was retained by the defendants for the payment of a repair bill. After hearing the evidence the following issues were submitted to the jury and the jury answered the issues as set out below; 1. Did the cefendant's contract ard asree to repair plaintiff's automo- bile for the sum of $75.20? Answer. Yes ée. If not, what was the reasonshle value of the repairs made to the plaintif?'s car by the defendant? ansver, it is, therefore, ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be, and he Ls hereby, declared tobe the owner of the 1946 Chrysler sutomoblle Motor No. 07-1262 and ts entitled to possession thereof upon paymrt to the defendants of the sum of 475.00 repsir bill and a $3.90 towin: charge, making a total payment to the defendants of $83.90. it is further ordered, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintl” recover of the defendants the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This 10th day of Merch, 1948. Je Will Pless, UT Judge Presicing 10° “9 J J Norm a t : VIKTH CAROLINE ee ees) eee ” cece \ shy 4 4 it TH . UPERIOR COURT (RET nase LREDELL COUNTY oe site . MARCH TERM, 1948 Ae Ve Stewart, Plaintiff Vs. ye Se Shook, Defendant Th Cc al is Je Will ae “—™ on to he heard, and being heard, before His Honor County Superior .’ wee Presiding at the March Term, 1948 of the Iredell fon the plaiakisr ane and it having been stipulated ana agreed by the attorne the facts and render the defendant that the Court coulda hear the evidence, f™ warranted; and it ApDe nen Judge tt As in the SG iscretion of the Court such ee ; appearing to the Court thet this is an action in Summary Be ment instity i = sitet bef tice of the Peace and appealled to this Court by r appearing that the plaintiff 1s the owner and ne? he pleadings; and it se had expended certain padi! n the pemises described in the plé er sonable rent ums expended by him aft ng ar F the Court 8; and it further appear, °JO and that a » that the amount expended by the ¢ for ccupled by the nian rental for said premises was $110.00 deducting the rea to the Court ana ant was $515 the period 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1948 Wednesday, March 10th, 1948 It is, therefore, rdered, considered, adjudged and decreed, that the plaintiff recover possession of the premises deseribed in the pleadings on payment to the defendant of the sum of $375.00; and it is further ane adjudged and decreed that in the event the defendant fails to vacate said premises and deliver possession thereof to the plaintiff that the Sheriff of Iredell County remove the defendant from the premises and to put the defendant in possession thereof. ‘he plaintiff and the defend- ant are each taxed with one half of the cost. This 10th day of March, 19],8. J. Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding Yoo 3064 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. C. Me Deaton { Vs, ( Mooresville Building and Loan § Association. ' To the Superior Court of Iredell County: Since the January term of the Superior Cort of lredell County, the under- siged, Attorney for A. W. Colson, Liquédating Trustee, has made the following collections: 1948 February 2 Bruce Vanderburg $15.00 February 9 Floyd Beaver 20.00 February 9 Bruce Vanderburg 15.00 4 February 21 Bruce Vanderburg 15.90 February 21 Je Ge Cook--This note is claimed by J. C. Nantz and has been deposited in a specail account. 515-31 March 2 Bruce Vanderburg 15.00 Merch ); F. P. Beaver March 6 sTooaT Ce He. Surratt Re ppectfully submitted, Zed V. Turlington, ATTORNEY WRG Fe HR TEN STE TEE SE ESE IESE He HAE SE OUSE TETE ETE EGE FETE TEESE SE ESE TE : This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning “@Pch 11, 1948 at 9:30 O'clock. Judge Presiding IN THE SUPRIOR Q URT MARCH TEKM, 194% Thursday, March llth, 198 Mis Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment Thur sday Morning, March llth, 198 at 9:30 O'clocke Ke Me Campbell DIVORCE si Vs. The Divorce Jury #1 being duly sworn and ©mpanelled answers the issues submitted to Lt as follows: Johnsie Campbell NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPHHOR COURT [IREDELL COUNTY MAKCH TERM, 198 Ke Me Campbel] Va. Johnsle Campbell le bid the plaintiff ane the defendant intermarry as alleed in the Complaint? Answor. Yos,. Hog the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for en one yeur next precedin: the flliny of this Complaint ? Ore YB. nt separate from the plaintiff and have they lived n pertod of two years or more ag Alleged in the Complatrt! IN TF SUPERIOR COURT, MAKCH TERM, 19a. Me Campbell, Vs. Jonnste Campbell. yy es ss his cuuse comin or ; : e! This cause comity 1 to be heard and bet ng heard at the March, 1948 ,7 the Superior Court ae : he wy ey Lor ourt of iredel]] ( Ounty, before His Honor, J5 Will Pless, Jey . wa ‘ ‘ e Presiding, und an jury, and It In favor of the plaintiff ana agninat the defendant >, As fully appeardin Lt Ls, there f re, ordered, } “Tre t re ¥ { . t t Gs] aré : vro 6 ist ne be »WeAn he I laintirg and the de fandant be, and the sam ' hereby d 1 Ssolve ‘ e , ] 1 t- { 4 r a f I om x 1 ad ani th P a nt Cf ls he rea by vrant 6d an a bsolu te d vore defendant, This j ud me 1) t U nt shall not effect the order heretof or id is caus award 1 mr al 1mo nV e This the llth day of March, IJks. Jre Je Will Pless — Judge Presiding. tee the Jury having A4nswored all the issues submit adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrin® IN THE SUPERIOR coury MARCH ‘ERM, 194 Thursday, March llth, 194 Re Me Campbell VB~ Johnsie Campbell It 1s ordered that the platntiff pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of dredell County as counsel fees for Ray Jennings, Counse) for Mrs. Johnsie Crmpbell, the sum of $75.00, said amount obs de ds before Saturday, May 15, 190. Je Wil) Pless, Jr. Judge Prestding. No. SP-%25) NORTH CAROLLNA, [IN THE SUPERIOR CCU [REMELL COUNTY. MARCH TERM, 194c. Xobert M. burns and Wife, Olivia 7. Kurns, V86 George lh. Couch and wife, kdith V. Youch This cause was heard before the un lersigned, J. Will Pless, Jr., Jucpe Fresiding, and @ jury, and pending the trial the parties have agreed to settle ail Uhines in depute between them, und, in accordance with said nvree nent, it 1s now, by consent of attorneys for the plaintiff and attorneys for the defendant, considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed: 1. That the map mde by G. Sam Rowe, Kevistered Civil knegineer, dated Lecember i, 191;7, and which hus been initialed "JeWePe", #6 hereby adopted as the official map for the purpose of drawing this judgment, and that the same shall be attached thereto. 2, thet the petitioners, Kobert M. Burns and wife, Olivia T. jurne, fre the owners and entitled to the immediate possession of that triangular shaped lot shown on the said map an’ which is the southeast corner of Lot No.7 and the southwest corner of Lot No. U, and which has been marked "A", and runs thence with the red line North 5 degrees 40 minutes Kast to a point on said ™p marked "83", which said point is to be marked with an tron stake; thence South 6 degrees and 40 minutes Last approximately elght feet to a point marked "C" on sata mip, and which is tobe further marked on the ground with an tron rakes thence from said point South 11 COGPOSE SRE 7) SEMIS Teer OP te beginning corner marked "A" on said map. de That the defendart s, George R. Couch and wife, Edith V. Couch, are the Owners of andentitled to the immediate possession of thoee lands beginning 8 4 * the potnt marked "B" on said map, and which was referred to in [tem 2 of a Aine a ne nnn IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 194 Thursday, March llth, 198 this decree, and running thence with the line of the petitioners! Plot heres, awarded to the point marked "C" on said map; thence North 11 degrees and 34 minutes East » &nd Whig, is marked "D" on said map; thence North 86 degrees and 30 minutes West 15 tap & ae . feet to an iron pin on the Henkle-Craig back line Ft to a point in said line and which is marked on the map as "E", ana 18 to be 4g fe 7 further marked on the ground with an iron stake; thence South 5 degrees 30 minutes West to the point marked "B", the beginning. 4. That it is agreed by the parties and the Court hereby Appoints yy Re Le Crawley as the representative of the court to go upon the lands and mp; ri ik SU Cg Damme) SES ' ‘ the corners referred to in the items above. 5 That this judgment shall constitute a conveyance of all Of the inter of George Re Couch and wife in the lands herein awarded to Robert i, Burns, hiy helrs and asdgns, and shall likewise constitute a conveyance by Kobert , Bury and wife of all their interest in snd to the lands awarded to the said Couch, his heirs and assigns: it being further ordered that this judgment shall be registered in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County. r ; 6. That the cefendants, George Ke Couch and wife, will pay the fees of all witnesses subpoenaed by them, e xcept the surveyor, %. Sam Rowe, and that the nlein f. ¥ : } rhe pleintiff, Robert M. Burns, will pay the remainder of the cost. Fone by consent this the llth day of March, 19,3. By consent: 5 FRONT Vom Je Will Pless, Jr. Judge Presiding. Scott & Collier by Rk. A. Collier 2° Attorneys for PlaftntiftT. wa land, Sowers & Avery, eB) “at Burke & Burke hi ‘ Attorneys for Defendant. if Wk the tet PURE TE eee eb Se Uh ESE th He abst Shek te hae eb Ie ESE se Tb sb TSE ae ask EEE NOe 1002 NORTH CaROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, VSe 0 ORD REVOKING PROBATION. MARY PRICE, Defendant. { It appearing to the Court and the Court finds as © fact that this defendant Mary Price entered a plea of GUILTY to the charge of assault with a deadly weapon in [redell Superior Court May 28, 1947, before his Honor Felix & alley anc was given 4 suspended sentence of 18 months in the women's devision of the State Prison and was placed on probation for a period of 5 years. ft now appesring to the Court frome vidence presented it in open Court by T. 4. Stokes, State Probation Officer, in report and petition, , this defendant being present, that she has violated the conditions of pro- bation by associleting with disreputable people in questioneble places, by serving a sentence in New Jersey for vagrancy, and for failing generally to co-operate with her probation officer; NOW, THEREFORE, I[T IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that her probation be revoked end this defendant ordered to be confined in the State Institution for delinquent girls at Samarcand, Nerth Carolina, for a period of 18 months and there remain until discharged by the proper authorities at trat institu- tion as provided by law. ‘This sentence is in lieu of the sentence entered May 20, 1947, wherein this defendent was sentenced to serve 13 months in the Women's division of the State Prison. This, the 9th day of iarch, 190. Frank M. Armstrong Resident Judge. FRONT ignite spec S Tot G ~~ tae —— << nepigimipecnntnemveirdig: ttt site Re cn aca v NOe 4),17 JeoPe NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY Ce Ce James { VSe { HOMESTEAD AND PERSONAL ae Ue Munday, J. Le Munday § PROPERTY HE XECMPTION. and Ella Poole (go WU. Munday) {, W. D. Morrison sheriff of Iredell County, have this dey summoned },1 Deitz, ". J. Matheson sm Kk. L. Yllbert, @s appraisers, to ley off ard assign ty the said ye Munday his homestead and personal property execmption. Eachf sali apprasisers 1s a discreet person and qualified to ect as a Juror in sald County, This the 4th day of March 1944. We D. Morrison Sheriff, ie aPPRAISERS!' RETURN. The undersigned, having been duly summoned and sworn to act as appraiser; of the homestead and personal property exemption of Q. U. Munday of Statesville township, Iredell County, by %. D. Marison Sheriff of said County, in the case :! Ue ,@ James VSe ce Us Mun lay et al., ado hereby ma ke the fot lowing return: Ke have viewed anc appraised the home steed of the sald ae Ue Munday and the dwellings si halldings thereon, owned and eccupled by the said ). Ue. Mun jay as e@ homestead wc we valued at $ + Said homestead adjoins the lands of a } 9 ‘ao " ole nd 1s bounded as follows: No real property and Ls exempt from sale under exec. and others according to law, } aon sie At the same time ara place we viewed and sppralsed, at the value annexe, the followin . >f : meowing articles of personal property, selected by the seld Q. U. Munday ' ‘ . Wit: 1 - 194) model pickup Dodze truck valued $250.00 which we declare to be a fall valuation, and the sald articles are exeémot from sale under said execution. Ne hereby certify, that we Pre not related by blood or marriage to the judgment debtor or the Judgement creditor in the above entitled action, ari heve no interest, near or remote, in the ebove home stead or perponal property e xecmpt lor: Given under our hands enc seals, this the 9th day of March, 19J- J. E. Deitz (see We. Je Matheson (Se R. Le Gilbert (sBAL The above ret ui , ~ " an J sut scribed in m res th 9th d ay of y presence, 6 March, } 348 ‘ W. D. Morrison Iredell County PIE See eb atte Shanon ge Noe 3417 Je Pe NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. Ce Ce James ' VSe HOMESTEAD AND PERONAL PROPERTY EYEMPTION. Qe U. Munday, Je Le Munday ! (J. L. Munday) and Ella Poole I, W. D. Morrison sheriff of Iredell County, have this cay summoned J. Ew Deitz, W. Je Matheson and R. L, Gilvdert, as appraisers, to lav off sand assign to the said J. L. Munday his homestead and personal property exemption. Each of said appraisers is a discreet person and qualified to act as juror in said County. This the 9th day of March, 1938. We D. Morrison onerifrt APPRAISERS! RETURN. The uncersigned, havinz been duly sum-oned and sworn to act as appralsers of the homestead and personal property exemption of J. +. Munday of Statesville township, L[redell County, by W. D. Morrison Sheriff of saic County, in the case A of Ce. Ce. James vse de Ue Munday et al., do hereby make the following return: Ve have viewed and appraised the homestead of the said J. L. Munday and the dwellings and buildings thereon, owned and Occupied by the said J. L. Munday as 4 homestead which we valued at $1,000.00. Said homestead adjoins the lands of and others and is bounded ag follows: An undivided one-half interest in the followings tract: Beginning at a stake on Munday's line on the East side of Drake Street; thence Ne 60 W. 159 feet to a stake in Drake Street; thence with said street 13k. 60 feet to a stake; thence 5.60 E. 150 feet to a stake in Tom Gilleland's line, formerly Cable's line; thence S. 25 W. 60 feet tothe beginning, containing t of an fcreé more or less and is exempt from sale under execution, according to law, at the same time and place we viewed and appraised, at the value annexed, t che following articles of personal property, selected by the said J. L. Munday to wit: 1 Walnut dresser & stool val ue $50.00 lwbed value $5.00 1k poster bed " 25.00 1 tron bea " 5.00 1 upholstered couch 7 ho.00 1 Heater ” 10.00 . chair " 15.00 l dresser " 15.00 1 O11 stove heater " 25.00 1 range . 15.00 1 straight chair . °50 1 kitchen safe " 5-00 1 chiffonier " 20.00 Total ,, %235+50 1 bed " 5.00 on Sao ah Melina oe which we declare to be a fiir valuation, and the said articles are exempt fy On sale under said execution. We hereby certify, that we are not related by blood or marr is ge to th 6 judgment debtor or the judgment creditor in the above entitled action, and hay ie Beginning at @ stake on Monday's line on the Kast thence Ne 60 We 159 feet to a stake in Crake Street; thence with sai2 street N 13 Ee 60 feet to oT. t eggs ee 60 Ee 150 feet to e stake itn Tom Gilleland's ee formerly Gable's ne; rence Se 25 We. 60 feet to the hee nie : , —, . 1@ beginning, c ontaining and ig exempt from sale under execution, according to law. Side of Drake Street; no interest, near or remote, in the above homestead or personal PP perty examn: pth: G iv en The shove return was made and March 190 4 oole Lb. Morrison sheriff of ’ lat} a ¢ @20on ana home stead scraet neraon The unde ’ \dersilen: havin: bee laly ione slead ane Persone] 4redell County, by we 7 » Morrtgon Sheriff of mes va, J ' ‘~* * Uunday e+ el e , do he ret ay se] IV make ania 44 t ( aj raised the Bi estea t € eid lila h wm Sf of ) , iy Ownre ‘ 3 ica Ty Occupled hy the salt ; El , = a4 Ella Said he i ome stead ad 4 v estate in Ay) under our hands and seals, this the 9thday of March, 198 subscribed in my presence the Oth day or iredel) and and Lurmuned + property exemption of Ella -half interest in At the same time and place we viewed anc appraised, et the value annexed nn is the following articles of personal property, selected by the said Elin Poole to J. E. Deitz (SEAL) wit: noe a4 MPM Mn neo Wooden bed valued " " table oi cupboard Cresser we bed oak dresser rocker chairs table + We de Ma the son(spir Au) Io —Ke be Gilbert (stay We De. Morrison oa heriff of Tredell Courts RPM RRR Re ee $236.00 valuation, Total *eeee which we Celcare be a be a fair from sale under ssid exccutior. + } } to andthe said articles sre eyempt not related by bleod or the have We hereby certify, that we are judgment cebtor or the judgment creditor in the above e no interest, near or remote, in the above homesteud or to ane marrlape ititied ection, , ' ilven under cur hands and seals, ! h ) y of March, 19 7 4 y ” + » Jae Deitz Matheson (£] b.éhis, fa R. Le. Gilbert (SEAL) DADWDsr P. RSONAL PRO} hov The ® bove end subserthed in my the 9thdey of Merch, 1948, (} lla Poole) return wes made presence, We De Morrison Sheriff of Iredell County. ounty, heave this day summoned As Appraisers, ¢t personal nroperty ervemption. ' ’ OY h uror 4 qualified to act as 4 Morrison es appraisers of ve ‘oole of Statesville towshlp pe sald County, in the case of Ce the following return: We have view sAtrc Poole and the cwell ings and bullelt 4 ué *Oole as a homestead which we vat oins } ui s the lmds of endothers and ts bounied as fe undivide d one the following tract: nal property exemption No. 68 NORTH CAROLINA In the Supertor Court IREDELL COUNTY J. M. darmon, Piaintiff ORDER Vs. J. C. Glosson, Defendant -_ - > lh = This causé coming on to be heard upon the application of the defendan for a change of venue, and it appearing to the Court from an examination Of the compleint and the application of the defendant that the Proper venue of this actly 1s Mecklenburg County; It is now ordered that this action be and the same is hereby removed fry the Superior Court of [redell County to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County; {It is further ordered that all original papers filed in this case be transamitted to the Court to which the case is removed. This 9 day of April, 198. Ce. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior (or Bie WE MEET ESE Teh ese se see see VETERE Te TE Eb Ted edt Se ob sede dE a8 oe No. 4257 North Carolina In the Supertor Court Iredell County M. F. Couch, Pleintiff Vs. { JUDGMENT OF Defendant t This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, md the plaintirr having come into court an permission to take a voluntery non-suit, It is, ther asked efore, ordered, considered and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby, by consent, Gismissed as on a judgment of non-sult, This the 12th day of April, 1948. C. G. Smith of Iredell County We consent to: Jas R. Burgess Retorneys for platstiy7— Scott & Collier orneys for endant. PE Sa ee se ada dnn sptbende #4 Ce Ce Lackey Donald F, Levbert, Willie Mae “embert and Re Clerk Of the to the t STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT couUNTY OF IREDELL STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA VS. CLYDE R. FORTNER, ORDER TERMINATING PROBATION Defers ant DOCKET NO. 959-960 It appearing that the above defendant was placed on probation by the Hon. Felix E. Alley, Judge holding this court on the 28th day of May, 19,7, for a period of five years, and it further appearing that said pro- bationer, Clyde R. t‘ortner, is now serving a sentence of from ten to twelve years in the State's Prison from Davie County and termination has been approved by Mr. J. H. Sanple, Director of Probation, Raleigh, N. C. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendant, Clyde ‘, Fortner, be, and is hereby, released from the probation Judgment in this cause. This the 12 day of april, 19\0. Frank M. Armstong JUDGE EAE ETE TERE TE Eo Se SESE ae Se aE ENE ESE So dee He ses dese sete de Noe LY75 NORTH CaROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT BEFORE THE CIE RK Plaintirr Vs. JUDGMENT B. Shumaker Defendants , OOS Orn cee ere Thie cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it aprearing Court that the Plaintiff and Defendant have adjusted and settled on ma tters ang controversy existin: between them. And that the Plaintiff asked to be Sllowed to take a non suit. It 1s therefae on the motion of Land, Sowers & Ay “’PYs 8d judged and decreed that the Plaintiff be and he is hereby allowed to take @ non suit and the Plaintiff is non suited. This the B th day of April, 198. C. G. Smith Clerk of Superl or Court, Iredell Co. Wtt sete ORE ESE Re TE Sb ae SESE SEE TE SESE SESE SEE SESE SESE EE SE Trl liatl—lie Se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY PEARL R. SHERRILL, Plaintiff, NO. 10090 Vs. SUMMONS CULLEN M. SHERRILL, Defendant. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, To the said Cullen M. Sherrill, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within twenty days after servics of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service, if served within the State of Washington, or within sixty days after service of this surmons upon you, exclusive of the day of service, if served out of the State of Washing. ton, and answer the complaint and serve a copy of your Answer upon the unéer- — signed at the place below specified, and defend the above entitled action in the Court aforesaid; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be render against you according to the demand of the complaint, which will be filed with the Clerk of said Court, a copy af which is herewith served upon you. SCOTT, LANGHORNE & McGAVICK Kttorneys for the Plaintii?T Office and P. 0. Address: 620 Perkins Building Tacoma 2, Washington Received Jul 10, 1947 Patrick M. Steele, Pros. Atty., by MH Filed in Co. Clerks Office. Plerce Co. Wash. Jul 10, 197 Robt. Le Dykeman, clerk, by RG Dep. gee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY PEARL R. SHERRILL, Plaintirr, Noe 10090) Vs. COMPLAINT CULLEN M. SHERRILL, DEfendant, Comes now the plaintiff and for cause of action against the defendant, alleges as follows: married at Tacoma, Washingto? now and ever Since said time have been husband and wift ITl. That there are two children the issue of the marriage of the parties hereto, namely: Arlen Lee Sherrill, aged 15 years, and Fred Allen Sherrill, aged 13 years; that said children are now in the care, custody and control of the plaintiff and that she is a fit and proper person to have the care, custody and control of said minor children, subject to the right in the defendant to visit with said children at reasonable and proper times. Iv. That there is no community property belonging to the parties hereto situated in the State of Washington for disposition by the Court. V. That plaintiff is the owner in her separate right of the folluwing described real property situate in the County of King, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot Nine (9), Vashon Island, Abandoned Military Reservation, located in Sections One, Two and Three, Township Twenty-one (21) North, Range Two (2) East Willamette Meridian, containing Ten (10) acres according to the Government Survey thereof. That the said property should be set aside to the plaintiff free and clear of all or any rights and demands of the defendant. VL. That for a long time past the defendant has assumed and maintained toward the plaintiff an indifferent attitude and has made no effort to canceal the fact that he has neither love nor affection for the plaintiff, and by humerous annoying acts and words, has made the homelife of the plaintiff burden- some in the extreme; that said defendm t has failed, neglected and refused to support the plaintiff or the minor children of the parties since June 16, 1963 thet all of said acts and conduct on the part of the defendant are and were without just cause or provocation on the part of the plaintiff, and by reason thereof the plaintiff has lost all love and affection for the defendant and that it is impossible for the plaintiff to longer maintain the relationship of husband and wife with the defendant. VII. That the defendant is a strong, healthy, able-bodied man, and capable °f earning a substential income. That the sum of $75.00 per month is a reason- ‘dle amount to require the defendant to pay to the plaintiff as and for the “pPort and maintenance of the minor children of the parties. VIII. That the sum of $200.00 is a reasonable sum to be allowed plaintiff ha ° and for hep attorneys! fees herein. WHEREFORE, plaintirt prays that she be granted an Interlocutory Decree of D Lvorce from the defendant; that said Decree be made final at the end of six months providing no appeal has been taken therefrom and the Parties here. to have not become reconciled; that the plaintiff be awarded the O8re, custody and control of the minor children of the parties, subject to the right in the defendant to visit said children at reasonable and proper times; that the rea) proprty situtate in King County, described in Paragr,ah V hereof, be set ald to the plaintiff free and clear of all or any rights and demands of the defend. ant; that the defendant be required to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $75.00 per month as and for the support and maintenance of the minor children of the parties; and that the sum of $200.00 be allowed plaintiff as and for her attorneys’ fees herein, and that plaintiff have such other and further relief as to the Court may seem meet and equitable. SCOTT, LANGHORNE, & McGAVICK Kttorneys for the Plaintii?— Office and P. 0. Address; 620 Perkins Building Tacoma, Washington. STATE OF WASHINGTON 4§ County of Pierce i PEARL R. SHERRILL? being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and say: That she is the within named plaintiff; that she has read the foregoing complaizi, knows the contents thereof and believes the same to be true. PEARL R. SHERRILL Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8th day of July, 1917. C. M. LANGHORNE otary ec ina or the State of Washington, residing at Tacoma, Received Jul 10, 197 Patrick M, Steele, Prog. Atty. by MH Filed in Co, Clerks Office, Pierce Co. Wash. Jul 10, 1947 Rébt. L. Dykeman, clerk by RG Dep. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE oF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY PEARL Re SHERRILL, NO. 10090 Plaintiff, am AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Ve CULIEN M. SHERRILL, Defendant. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Mateo Wn. Je Schade, being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: That he is now and at all times herein mentioned has been a Deputy in the Office of the Sheriff of San Mateo County, California, a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the State of California, and over the age of twenty-one years; that he is not a party to the above entitled action and is competent to be a witness herein; That on the 16th day of July, 197, he served the Sumons and Com- plaint in the above entitled action, upon the defendant, Cullen M, Sherrill, by handing to and leaving with the said Cullen M. Sherrill personally at Mills Memorial Hospital, San Mateo, California, a true and correct copy of said summons and complaint. Wm. J. Schade Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16th day of July, 1947. Edward J, R n otary ¢ in and for the of California, residing at Menlo Park Filed in Co. Clerks Office. flerce Co. Wash. Jul 2 » 1947 obt. Le Dykeman, cler » by RG Dep. FRONT \: » 7 # IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY R. SHERRILL anen Plaintiff NO. 10090 Ve. { AFFIDAVIT re MILITARY SERVICE j CULLEN M. SHERRILL, Defendant STATE OF WASHINGTON } 88 COUNTY of Pierce ) PEARL R. SHERRILL, being first duly sworn, upon oath de PO8CS and gay;: that at all times herein mentioned she is md has been a citizen of the Unites States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of twenty-one years, and makes this affidavit for and on behalf of plaintiff in the above entitled cause for the purpose of securing an order of default against the above named defendant. Affiant further says that the defendant is now and was at all times since the institution of the above entitled action a resident of the State of Valifornia. That the said defendant is not now and has not been within the last thirty ~~ in the military or maval service of the United States as defin in the Act of ongre Ss cited as The Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of March 3, 191d, and as amended and re-enacted thereafter. PEARL R. SHERRILL Subseribed and sworn to before me this 23rd day of September, 197. Ce Me La orne otary Publie In a or the State of Washington, residing at Tacoma, Filed in Open court Dep. 2 Sept. 23, 19)7 Nobt L. Dykemm, clerk by K. Dep, IN THESUP: RIOR COURT OF THE sTaTE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY PEARL R, SHERRILL, Plaintirr CULLEN M, SHERRILL, t MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR DEFAULT Defendant, ) Comes now & McGavick, herei nN @ainst the above named defendant, Cullen M. Sherrill. This motion is Pased upon the seo he rds a t “ffidavit of ciirrora y, nd files hereof ant upfe langhorne attached hereto, SCOTT, LANGHORNE & McGAVICK. orneys for e pla Office and P O Address: 620 Perkins Building Tacoma, 2, Washington GTON ) gtaTé OF WASHIN | = county of Pierce ) CLIFBORD M.LANGHORNE, being first duly sworn, the 16th day of July, 1947, summons md complaint we d upon the defendant herein, in San personaly ticularly appears by the affidavit of service on file h re duly, regularly and t has not appeared herein; that mo motion, demurrer, answer or aaa & kind whatsoever has been served upon the attorneys for the laintiff herein or filed with the Clerk of the above entitled Court and the tefendant is in default herein. CLIFFORD M. LANGHORNE scribed and sworn to before me 23rd day of September, 197 H. HADDOCK ce Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at Tacoma Filed in open court Dep. 2 Sept. 23, 1947 Robt. Le Dykemm, clerk by K Dep. oul eetteetiemeetinmeemeee arene IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PEARL R. SHERRILL, . Plaintirr f No. 10090) Vs. } FINDINGS OF FACT CULIEN M. SHERRILL, i AND J Defendant This matter coming on regularly to be heard on this 23rd dq of September, 1947; plaintirr appearing in person and by her attorneys of record herein, Seott, or being represented by Counsel; the Martin Potter, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney of Pierce County, Washington; and it “ppearing to the Court that an order of default had been heretofore issued *ealnst the defendant herein duly adjudging said defendant to be a default herein; and the Court having heard the testimony of the plaintiff in support of the allegations of her complaint on file herein; and being fully advised in the Premises, does hereby make the following FINDINGS OF FACT L. That Plaintiff is now and has been for more than one year last past 7 ime diately preced ing the commencement of this action, # resident of "coma, Plerce County, Washington. upon oath deposes and ays; that he is one of the attorneys for the above namd plaintiff; that on 8 ’ Mateo County, California, erein; that nore then sixty days have elapsed since the date of such service and that the Langhorne & McGavick; the de@endant appearing neither in person State of Washington appearing by Honomble Oe ee Be Fi eaten neienatitinniaates — a2 4 een a ~ te Stee eee . an a sos ta lan AE de om - i. ene ar annette ie agp MEI a . a II. That the plaintiff and defendant were married at Tacoma, Washingto, on May 1), 1931, and are now and ever since have been husband and wife, III. That there are two children the issue of the marriage of the Parties hereto, namely; Arlen Lee Sherrill, aged 15 years, and Fred Allen Sherriji, Age 13 years; that said children are now in the care, custody and control of the plaintiff and thatshe is a fit and proper person to have the care, custody an control of said minor children, subject to the right tn the defendant to visit with said children at reasonable and proper times. IV. That thre is no community property belonging to the parties hereto situated in the State of Washington for disposition by the Court. Ve That the plaintiff is the owner in her separate right of the follork described real property situate in the County of King, State of Washington, tor: Lot Nine (9), Vashon Island, Abandoned “{litary Reservation, located in Sections One, Two and Three, Township Twenty-one (21) North, Range Two (2) East Willamette Meridian, containing Ten (10) acres according to the Governnent Survey thereof. That the said property should be set aside to the plaintiff free and clear of ell or any rights end demands of the defendant. VI. That for a long time past the defendmt has assumed end maintained toward the plaintiff an indifferent attitude anc has made no effort to concetl the fact that he has neither love nor affection for the plaintiff, and by numerous annoying acts and words, some in the extreme; has made the homelife of the plaintiff burden that seid defendant has failed, neglected ari r efused to support the plaintirr or the minor children of the parties since June 16, 19h6i that 811 of said acts and conduct on the part of the Out just cause defendant are and were vill or provocation on the part of the plaintiff, and that by reaso thereof the Plaintiff has lost 11 love and affection for the defendant and it is impossible for the Plaintiff to longer maintain the relationship of husband and wife with the defendant, VII. Th at the defendant is @ strong, healthy, able-bodied man, and capable of earnin § @ substantial income. That the sum of $75.00 per month is a reason” VIII. That the sum of $200.00 is a reasonable sum to be allowed pleintirr as and for her attorneys’ fees herein. DONE in open Court this 23rd day of September, 1947. F. G. REMANN JUDGE From the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Court makes the following CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I. That the Court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter of this action. II. That the plaintiff is entitled to be awarded an Interlocutory Decree of Divorce from the defendant, Cullen M. Sherrill, by the terms of which either party to this action, at the expiration of six months from the entry of said Interlocutory Decree may move this Court to make said decree final, if no appeal has been taken fromthe same and there hag been no reconciliation between the parties hereto. III. That said Decree should further provide that the plaintiff be awarded the care, custody and control of the minor children of the parties, subject to the right tn the defendant to visit said children at reasonable and proper times. Iv. Said decree should further provide that the real property situate in King County, Washington, described in Paragraph V of the above Findings of Fact, to set aside to the plaintiff, free and clear of all or any rights and demands of t he defendant. Ve Said Decree should further provide that the defendant be required to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $75.00 per month as and for the support ‘nd maintenance of the minor children of the parties, namely; Arlen Lee Sherrill, aged 15 years, and Fred Allen Sherrill, aged 13 years; and thet *1d defendant be required to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $200.00 as and for her Sttorneys! fees herein, together with her costs and disbursements herein expended, DONE in open Court this 23rd day of September, 19)7. F. G. REMANN JUDGE PRESENTED py; 4 AIL #. HADDOCK Filed in Co. Clerks Office Open court. Dept. 2 Sept. 2&3, 1947 Robt « Le Dykemen, clerk by K Dep. . : Re at)? i * vat ae “ 4 } | ee — 2. = ae iy b 3 } i iy) ~ hee a Ee pera te % Fs eeprom = —— —— 5 eer SEER ore ot ae nee a | | Ram a V peme (J II. That the plaintiff and defendant were married at Tacoma, Washingto, on May 1), 1931, and are now and ever since have been husband and wife, III. That there are two children the issue of the marriage of the Parties hereto, namely; Arlen Lee Sherrill, aged 15 years, and Fred Allen Sherri, Agni 13 years; that said children are now in the care, custody and control of the plaintiff and thatshe is a fit and proper person to have the care, custody an control of said minor children, subject to the right tn the defendant to visit with said children at reasonable and proper times. IV. That thre is no community property belonging to the parties hereto situated in the State of Washington for disposition by the Court. Ve That the plaintiff is the owner in her seperate right of the follory described real property situate in the County of King, State of Washington, to Lot Nine (9), Vashon Island, Abandoned “ilitary Reservation, locate in Sections One, Two and Three, Township Twenty-one (21) North, Range Two (2) East Willamette Meridian, containing Ten (10) acres according to the Governnent Survey thereof. That the said property should be set aside to the plaintiff free and olear of ell or any rights end demands of the defendant. VI. That for a long time past the defendm t has assumed and maintained toward the plaintirr an indifferent attitude and has made no effort to concetl the fact that he has neither love nor affection for the plaintiff, and by numerous annoying acts and words, has made the homelife of the plaintiff burdet some in the extreme; that said defendant has failed, neglected ani r efused to support the plaintiff or the minor children of the parties since June 16, 19kéi that 811 of said acts &nd conduct on the part of the defendant are and were vit Out just cause or Provocation on the part of thereof the plaintirr has lost is impossible the pladintirf, and that by reaso ®1l1 love and affection for the defendant and it for the pleintirr to longer miintain the relationship of husbet and wife with the defendant, VII. That the defendant is a strong, Of earning a substantial income, eble healthy, able-bodied man, and captlt That the sum of $75.00 per month is # ress the defendant to pay to the plaintiff as and for the of the mihor children of the amount to re quire support md maintenance parties. VIII. That the sum of $200.00 is @ reasonable sum to be allowed plaintiff for her attorneys’ fees herein. DONE in open Court this 23rd day of September, 1917. FP. G. REMANN JUDGE From the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Court makes the following CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I. That the Court has jurisdiction of the parties and of the sub ject matter of this action. II. That the plaintiff 1s entitled to be awarded an Inter locutory Decree of Divorce from the defendant, Cullen M. Sherrill, by the terms of which either party to this action, at the expiration of six months from the entry of said Interlocutory Decree may move this Court to make said decree final, if no appeal has been taken fromthe same and there hag been no reconciliation between the parties hereto. III. That said Decree should further provide that the plaintiff be awarded the care, custody and control of the minor children of the parties, subject to the right tn the defendant to visit said children at reasonable and proper times. Iv. Said decree should further provide that the real property situate in King County, Washington, described in Paragraph V of the above Findings of Fact, to set aside to the plaintiff, free and clear of all or any rights and domanis of the defendant. Ve Said Decree should further provide that the defendant be required *o pay to the pleintirr the sum of $75.00 per month as and for the support ‘nd maintenance of the minor chilfren of the parties, namely; Arlen Lee Sherrill, “ged 15 years, and Fred Allen Sherrill, aged 1% years; and thet 1d defendant be required to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $200.00 as and for her attorneys! fees herein, together with her costs and disbursements herein ex pended, DONE in open Court this 23rd day of September, 1917. F. G. REMANN JUDE PRESENTED BY: SAIL #. RADDOCE Piled in Co. Clerks Office Open court. Dept. 2 Sept. #3, 1947 Robt « Le Dykemen, clerk by K Dep. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FoR PIERCE COUNTY PEARL R. SHERRILL, PAaintifrf NO. 10090) Va~ ORDER OF DEFAULT CULLEN M. SHERRILL, Defendant. This matter coming on regularly to be heard upon the motion of th plaintiff herein for an order of default against the above named defendant; and it appearing to the Court that summons and complaint in the above entitled action were duly, regularly and personally served upon the said defendant in San Mateo County, California, as more particulariy appears by the affidavit of service on file herein; that more than sixty days have elapsed since the dats of such service and that the said defendant has not appeared in said action by attorney or otherwise; that no demurrer, motion, answer or pleading of any kind whatsoever has been served upon the attorneys for the plaintiff herein has been filed with the Clerk of the above entitled Court; and the Court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED That the default of the Gefendant, Cullen i. Sherrill, be and the same is hereby entered against him. DONE in open Court this <3rd day of september, 1947. F. G. REMANN PRESENTED BY: Filed in open court Dep, 2 Sept. 23, 197. Robert L. Dykeman, clerk by x. Ent Jour 9 page 369 Dep. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY ‘EARL R. SHERRILL, intift Pla No. 10090h, Ve INTERLOCUTORY DECREE OF DIVOR Defendant This matter coming on regularly to be heard upon the motion of the plaintiff herein for an Interlocutory Decree of Divorce from the Defendant, Cullen Me Sherrillj the plaintirr appearing in person and by her attorneys herein, Scott, Langhorne & McGavick; the defendant appearing neither in person or being represented by attorneys; the State of Washington being represented by Honorable Martin Potter, Deputy Presecuting Attorney of Pierce County, Wash- ington; the default of the defendant having been heretofore entered against him; and the plaintiff having offered evidence in support of the allegations of her complaint on file herein; and the Court having considered the same and having heretofore made and filed its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law herein, in writings and being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, Pearl R. Sherrill, be and she is hereby awarded an Interlocutory Decree of Divorce from the defendant, Cullen M. Sherrill, THIS INTERLOCUTORY DECREE DOES NOT DISD LVE THE MARRIAGE of t he parties or grant a divorce. After the expiration of six months from the date thereof, if the parties hereto have not resumed the mrital relations, either of the parties hereto, upon making proper application by motion or petition to the Court, may have made and entered a final decree of absolute divorce, dissolving the marriage. Until such final decree shall have deen duly made and entered, the marriage of the parties hereto is not dissolved, and they remain husband and wife. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED thet plaintiff be and she hereby ig awarded the care, custody and control of the minor children of the parties, mamely; Arlen Lee Sherrill, aged 12 years, and Fred Allen Sherrill, “4 13 years, and that the defendant shall have the right to visit said children *6 reasonable and proper times. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the plaintiff be and the hereby ig ‘warded, as her sole and separte property, free and clear of all or a Y rights and demands of the defendant, the following described real property titua “in the County of King, State of Washington, to-wit: tn Seti lot Nine 6), Vashon Island, Abandoned Military Reservetion, located To (2) Ras One, Two and Three, Township Twenty-one (21) North, Range the Govennne Willamette Meridian, containing Ten (10) acres according to ment Survey thereof, a ee Pes © ee one geynngiapligaenyy iene b t iy | ie i ? . | 7B | a Y i t bf a t me > ; wed | & ? . ri) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the sum of $75.00 per month as and for the support an maint. enance of the minor children of the parties, namely; Arlen Lee Sherril), aged 15 years, and Fred Allen Sherrill, aged 13 years, the first of saig PAYment 4, be made immediately upon the entry of this Decree and succeeding payment, to be made on the 23rd day of each and every month thereafter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the defendant pay ty the plaintiff the sum of $200.00 as and for her attorneys' fees herein, togethy with her cost sna disbursements herein to be taxed. DONE in open Court this 23rd day of september, 197. F. Ge Remann PRESENTED BY: Gail H. Haddock Piledin open Court Dep.2 Sept 23, 1947 Robt. Le Dykeman Clerk byt Ent. Ex. Doce Noe 61 P, 5h Ent Jour 9 Page 370 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY PEARL R. SHERRILL, Plaintirr iia. aiccbidlians CULIEN Mm. SIERRI LL Defendant No. 10090h ABFIDAVIT FOR FINAL DECREE STATE OF WASH INGTON ) County of Pierce ” SHERRILL, being first duly sworn, upon oath Geposes and styl in nemed pleint irr; was entered in the above entitkh a actio that no appeal has non the 23rd day of September, 19473 bee n taken from the said decree; that the parties hereto hi not become reconciled and have not resumed the mari he entry of the Interlocutory rital relation since t Decree; Sgain live with the defendant WHERE FORE divorce from that it is impossible for this plaintiff to ever &s his wife, » @ffiant prays that she may be granted a final decree of the deferdant herein, PEARL R. SHERRILL Piled in co. Clerks Offices 3 Plerce Co. Wash. Mar. 25» 194 Robt. L. Dykemm, clerk by cr IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR PIERCE COUNTY Plaintiff No. 10090) Vs- FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE CULIEN M. SHERRILL, Defendant This matter coming on regularly to be heard this 25th day of March, 19,8, upon the application of the plaintiff, Pearl R. Sherrill, for a final decree of divorce herein; plaintiff being represented by her attorneys of record herein, Scott, Langhorne & McGavick; and it appearing to the Court that an Interlocutory Decree of Divorce was entered herein on the 23rd day of September, 197, and that noappeal has been taken therefrom and that the parties hereto have not become reconciled, but have at all times been living separate and apart; and the Court being fully advised in the premises; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, Pearl Re Sherrill, be and she is hereby granted a Final Decree of Divorce from the defendant, Cullen M. Sherrill, and each of the parties hereto are hereby restored to the status of a single person; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all the terms and conditions of the said Interlocutory Decree of Divorce be and the same are hereby, in all respects, ratified, confirmed and approved, as if fully set forth herein. DONE in open Court this 25th day of March, 198. ERNEST M. CARD JUDGE PRESENTED BY: GAIL H. HADDOCK Pe ee Filed in Co, Clerks Office. rleree Co. Wash. Mar. 25, 1948 obt. L. Dykeman, clerk of CI Dep. Ent Ex, Doc. No. 61 Pa 569 Ent Jour 15 Page 210 - wn i oem pat 3 ie ~ A aa ae = eine eel tr = mmr ee = = eee — « IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN anp FOR tip COUNTY OF PIERCE PEARL R. SHERRILL Plaintiff No. 10090 Vse CERTIFICATE CULIEN M. Sherrill De fendant I, Robt. L. Dykeman, County Clerk and by virtue of theo laws of the State of Washington ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for the County of Pierce, do hereby certify that the annexe and foregoing is a true copy of the SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT$ AFFIDAVIT oF SERVIC) AFFIDAVIT RE MILITARY SERVICE; MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR TEPAULT; FINDING OF Fur AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; ORDER OF DEFAULT: INTERLOCUTORY DECREE OF DICOR CRs arriy FOR FINAL DECREE; and PINAL DEC'EE OF DICORCE: in the above entitled action, » the same now appears on file and of record in this office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix my official sil at TACOMA, in said County, this lst dey of April 1948, Robt. Le Dykeman County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of said Superior Court. (CLERKS' SEAL) BY Robt. L. Dyke man Ti Te te ee Sethe ttt tt tae de as RTE TE EM thas SEE 488 bee NO. 4238 JUDGMENT SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Nellie Bass Gra nt, b next friend, os y ~ through her Spring Term, 1948 Fred Ae McGraw, Co., Ine., Clirr Weathers Bro ord Grant ard H, thers Transfer + W. Bass Vs. No. 378 Iredell County. ' E. Grant This cause came from the Superior Court ens Upon consideration whe the record ana Proceedings ote > tobe argueg u cord ll Count$; pon the transcript of the re urt is of o ini no error it f said Superior a” that there is It is th Opinion of the co, A oT® considered and Court, « adjudged by the Court here that the G to the said supeesivered by the Honorable M. vy Bamhill Justice, we 3 pehsidered and adjor courts to the intene that the JupgmeNT Is arAl tty co. ranefer co, “Gsed further, that the Defendants Fred A. MoOrt¥ costs of nearety to the appeal bond, Hartford = dollars ($12 85) Pree in this Court incurred, to mh * and ®xecution issue therefor. Adrain J. Newton Clerk of Supreme Court NOe 3862 NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. In the Superior Court, Befae the Clerk. Lottie Templeton Moore Vse J. He Moore This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Coust of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non-sult: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this caause be, and the same is hereby non-suited and dismissed. The plaintirf is taxed with the costs. This 5th day of May, 19,3. C. G. Smith érk Superfor Cour ee ee ee ek ke eee 2 ie eee ese ee aes “ No. 3677 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY. Before the Clerk. Sarah Kinard Howard Vs. JUDGMENT A. E. Howard This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non-suit: ‘t 1s, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this C@use be, and the same is hereby non-suited and dismissed. The plaintiff is taxed with the Costa. aa 8. s the 5th day of May, 19) C. G. Smith Clerk Superfor Court Be ae Oe Heike Se Se RE He SESE SE SESE SESE OE SESE SESE IESE SESE SE EE abe SEE a as =o ee 5 an Ria on oy . - £ Sie ae - asciee ~ a aa sane on ceases — a eS ER Oe La ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK - MAY TERM, 1248 Monday, May 17th, 19) Noe khh9 North Carolina NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT In the Superior Court MAY TERY, 19),8 Iredell County Before the Clerk Be it remembered that a Sunerior court begun and held in and for ae eo he Smith at 10:00 O'Clock ; A. Me» when and where His Honor, Charles L, Coggin, Judge, 1s present and 8. ait C I presiding by exchange with Hon. J. Will Pless, as per the following commission: Cre ompany, Inc. "EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Honor. able Carl G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it bees > Se ee aa ik ee eat Se tna ot ‘VE ee . "4 Ps L - Zz f& ve L appearing to the court from the statement of counsel that the parties herety have compromised, adjusted and settled all matters and things between them, Now therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff @ defendant recover mothing by this action, and any and all further liability of the plaintiff or defendant by reasons of the matters and things alleged in the complaint and answer and counter claim are hereby discharged, and that the plaintiff pay the costs to be taxed by the clerk, This 10 day of May, 19h8, Ce. Ge. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court Consented and agreed to: Grant Bolmer Attorney for Plalnttt? T. Grainger Pierce Kttorneys Tor Defenant— Wate eshte se see ate cede Wi tis te eb estes WHEREAS, The Hon. Charles L. Coggin, assigned by the Governor to hold the Sugsrior Courts of the Fourteenth (Mecklenburg County) Judictal District for the Spring Term, 19,8, and the Hon. J. Will Pless, Jr., assigned by law to hold the Superior Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District for said Spring Term, 1948, have agreed to exchange the Courts of the particular counties hereinafter named in their said respective districts for said Spring Term, 198; NOW, THEREFORE, I, R. GREGG CHERRY, Governor of the State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby consent to said exchange, and do hereby authorize the said Hon. Charles L. Coggin to hold the said Courts of the county of [redell: two weeks regular mixed court, May 17th and 2th, in the Fifteenth Judicial District, in lieu of the said Hon. J+ Will Pless, Jr. for said Spring Term, 193; and the said Hon. J. Will Pless, ire is hereby authorized to hold the said Courts of the county of Mecklenburg: two weeks conflict civil term of court, May 17th and 2th, 19,5, in the Four- teenth District, 1948, in lieu of said Hon. Charles L. Coggin for said Spring Term, N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the state to be affixed, thie the fifteenth day of April, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred snd forty-eight, and in the one hundred ‘nd seventy-second year of our American Independence. « GREGG CHERRY (SEAL) By the Governor; William De Snider Private Score tary7s—— and Honorable ifteenth guat th John R. McLaughlin, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney for the clal District of North Carolina is present and prosecuting in ® name of the State, and w. D, Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell county 1s Pre se nt and opened court by order of the Court. ote) site Re tine . ae heir tenn aoe e. as aan » SDS SECT A Ter ae ee ewer ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK- MAY TERM, me IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, May 17th, 19) FIRST WEEK- MAY TERM, a Monday, May 17th, 19) c if iff of Iredell County, ret ; | 4 a) . the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors fy vs i Court T the clifford C. Hall, Jre i } May Term, 1943, First Week, to-wit: ‘ LAR CEN Y hh 10° 9,0 —— q F. T. loftin J. M. Wagner Ray R. Gant State ere Chere és vs ey 3 G. F. Barnes Coite L. Josey R. D. Grier John He Summers | = | James Gregory A. P. Steele, Sr. J. Ernest Alexander } Yo. 942 § LAR ENY ay Hf F. J. Murdock W. B. Chambers R. E. Warren State Alias Capias — v3 a A. E. Guy William Crawford J. Paige King David Overcash i = J. We Joyner We Ae Sloop Re Je Calloway 9,2 | BASTARDY i Noe H . R. Hule Sloan W. Le Allison J. F. Orren State i Continued under former order Sag hi vs 7 i bY Buford Me Guy W. Ralph Grose Navie C. Williams nie L. Nicholson t =] Sati lie ci = , TE. Noe 954 ( ABANDONMENT AND NON-SUPPORT y rs yrtle P. Fox and H. 0. Montgomery, were excused from January Term, 19)8, mn: i state " Continued under former order gm to serve this May Term, 19:8 = et © Richard G. Miller | 4 Ae Ee Guy, W. Le Allison and R. D. Grier, were excused by the Court, Becta Je We Joyner, was excused on Doctor's Certificate. No. 966 RAKING, BOMBING SXD LARCENY mi i State Alias Capias | |B | L vs j 4 i : John Fe. Lambert i ; li nee {2T NON=SUPPORT l UES iH State NH * A er! By its in. = Defendant called amd failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and & No. 1012 { DRIVING DRU NK aii ‘ Z Robert Watts State Alias Capias Vs 2 Joe E. Turpin ! ‘| Ho. 725 BASTARDY | State Contin der f 5 ; i‘ rf di 7 | a nued uncer former order No. 1036 j ASSAULT WITH DEADLY YEAPON Le iy T. Le. Nixon | State 4 Defendant appeared and showed good behavior. _ ve § Continued under former order. | Qn 4 . Clyde Fox j wm + Noe 70 $ NON-SUPPOR? nn My State { Conti aS , ve i Ontinued under former order Noe 10)2 § LARCENY " 4 as Q + kin 4 p t i Manual Shoemaker 4 _ 1 The Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa — Vence Peacock and-Gapiss. Instanter Process. lt NO. 823 rawre sla ae ul 4 State momen ieee ENTERING AND LARCENY ae | Lee Woods { tate Caples "0. 10) ‘ Stat BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY p31 ie 4 - 7 } The defendant William Owens through his Attorney W. R. ee No. 65% HOUSP RRR awry W Battley enters a plea of guilty as charged. . State _ 7 Ts a Owens- a5 =| The defendant Willard E. Alley through his Attorney ria vs i ee a . prcered by the Court that this case be taken off ard E. Alleyas Je Ge Lewis enters a plea of guilty 8s charged. aad James E. Bruce == et end that the appearance bond be dischargede ¥ Cases #1075 and 1102 consolidated with this case for i i Judgment. aa ;, On the count for larceny, judgment of the Court as to | Ne NOs eg91 | EMBE225 MENT each of the defendants is that they be confined in the common State j "Gent beans jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS, and Pia bi { vec under former order assigned to work under the control and supervision of the { Ke Shaw Brown 4 State Highway and Public Works Commission. bail On the count for breaking and entering, judgment of the 1 N Q Court as to each of the defendants is that they be confined a 709 { NON-suPpoR? | in the STATE PRISON at Raleigh for not less than THREE nor — f Alles Capie more than FIVE YEARS, this sentence to commence at the Thoma L. gs i —" expiration of the sentence in the larceny count. This “amas Lk. Suumerg | prison sentence of three to five years as to each defendant is suspended for a period of five years from this date ; "eee : ; upon the following conditions. e ASSAULT wIty DEADLY WEAPON 1. That the defendant or either of them violate none H a ; ; Alias caniag of the laws of the State of North Carolina or of the United endergon P. Redmon : States during said period of FIVE YEARS. 2. That they refrian from the use of intoxicant liquors. Capias and commitment to put the foregoing sentence into effect to issue at any time upon motion of the Solicitor. It is suggested that each of the defendants be given a physical oxanim tion and such treatment as found necessary. 2S ae eT Se Se Se ee Saw SPSS es No. 1075 State vs William Owens "Rta ace vs William L. Owens Willard E. Alley No.l05) State vs Ruel Le Shoemaker No.e 1055 State vs John Leonard Now 1056 State vs John Leonsrd NQeat95 vs John Leonard Noe 1062 State vs Robert Teazue io. 1078 NORTH CAROLINA, TREDELL COUNTY, State, Vse Charlie Houser, TO We. D. MORR [SUN, HIGH SHERIFF oF Whereas, i { f IN THE SUPERIOR © URT FIRST WEEK~- MAY TERM, au6 Monday, May 17th, 19) BREAKING AND ENTER ING The defendant through his attorney w, R, Batt ley a plea of guilty of Receiving Stolen Goods Value of ee ($20.00). (See judgment in case #10))) on BREAKING AND ENTER ING The defendant William L. Owens through ALS attorns W. R. Battley enters a plea of Nolo Contendre, Verdi. Not Guilty. The defendant Willard E. Alley through his attorns Je Ge Lewis enters a plea of guilty. (See Judgment 41) FALSE PRETENSE Continued for the Defendant. DRIVING DRUNK; SPEEDING Alias Cap las ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Allas Cap ies CARRY CONCEALED WEAPON Alias Caplas SPEEDING The defendant called and failed. Capilas. Instanter Process. IN THE SUPERIOR OOURT, MAY TERM, 1948. ORDER FOR SPECIAL VENIRE. TREDE LL COUNTY, GREETING:- Judgment Nisi Sei Feu No. 1067 state jee Grover Sigmon Jack Franklin Joe Brittian-alias moad Brittian NOe 1068 State vs Jemes Grover Sigmon Jack Franklin Joe Brittian-allas Toad Brittian No. 1069 State vs James Grover Sigmon Jack Pranklin Joe Birttian-alias Toad Brittian No. 1110 State vs Corby Kelly 6-55 No. 1079 State vs “obo? Borders IN THE SUPERTOR COURT FIRST WEEK- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 17th, 1918 ROBBERY The defendants called and failed, Judgment Nisi § Fa and Capias. Instenter Process, - ROBBERY The defendants cal led end failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Cp ias. Instanter Process, - ROBBERY The defendants called and failed, Judgment Nisi sei Fa and Capias. Insterter Process. (New Bonds in the above entitlec cases to be double the amount of the present bonds) POSSESSING LIQUOR The cefendant through his Attorney, W. R. Battley enters a plea of guilty as charged. It is judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the common Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Com- mission By and with the consent of the defendant in open Court, this sentence is suspended for a period of TWO YEARS from this dete on conditions: 1. That the defendant pay the cost of this action at this term of Court; ¢ That he not be convicted of violating any of the laws of the State of North Carolina, especially the liquor laws. Capilas and committment to put the foregoing sentence into effect to issue at any time upon motion of the Solicitor. CARRY CONCEAIED WEAPON The defendant throurh his Attorney Hugh G. Mitchell enters a plea of guilty as charged. It is judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for ea period of TWO YEARS assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is to commence at the expiration of the sentence in #10480 and #1082 and #1082. ee ae =a : it has been found necessary to the end that a fair end LARCENY; DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY impartial trial of the Consolidated for judgment. It 1s judgment of the Court thet the defendant be con- fined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period No. 1040, 1081 & 1082 co Fe ied Sa ES defendant who stands charged with the crime of murder © ©e, may be had, Vs Ja “Ceo of TWO YEARS assigned to work under the supervision of the Stete Highway and Public Works Commission. It has been poggeered that the defendant is not of , the first degr { State { ( that a special venire of twenty-five (25) good ® lawful men t may be summoned from the body of Iredell County to act as jurors” 6m &3 may be necessary in the trial of Now, therefore, so many of th full mental control, it 1s suggested by the Courb thtt said action: he be given a mental examination. you are hereby commanded to summon such number of persons, five of whom shal BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Negro race, qualified to act The defendants through their attorney, W. R. Battley noe enters a plea of guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that each of the defendants igo! : be confined in the State's Prison at Raleigh for a period : Of THREE TO FIVE YEARS. The Prison sentence is suspended, as to each of the defendants, for # period of FIVE YEARS, and the defendants are placed on probation upon the conditions set forth in this judgment and further condition set forth in the order of probation. That as a special conditions of probation ordered by the Court, the defendants and each of them shell pay in Charles Litas rles LG int Clerk of for Court Iredell Jadee eslding ee 0 Tiah on ne xt peasy jurors, from the body of said county, to b , e@ an City of Statesville in Iredell Ae Me, on Tuesday, d appear at the Court House County, the 183th day of May, Jurors as may be chosen ’ State of North Carolina, at 9:30 ° 1948, to the end that so many of s#°" Sworn and emp tal of said action, Panelled to act as jurors in the tr Herein fail This the 17t not, and of t h day of May, 19ST” make due return, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK, MAYTERV, 19,8 Monday, May 17, 1948 IN THE SUPERIOR court FIRST WEEK - MAY TERM, 1918 Monday, May 17th, 1948 0 BREAKING, AND ENTERING AND LARCENY No. 27a & 1097 (Continued from other side of page) yo. 1070 & 1072 vs rT for the use and benefit of T. Payl Cherr state 0 f 7 3 ‘eins eth sum of $800.00 at the rate of $66.67 per mont} for 2 ones A. Hurst LARCENY AND ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The deferdant moves to set the verdict aside and for a new trial. Motion denied, Exception. Motion in arrest of judgment, Motion denied, Exception. Judgment 7 Jenes A Cartt vor the first payment, to be made on or before sr .. nownoed, to which the defendant excepts and gives notice 1 ’ ter until full a F Frank Stutts and each month thereaf Mount is noi), of appeal to the Supreme court in o 0 g pay the coust costs now; shall not drink any intoxteati: notice waived. Appeal bond fixed gt Agger ee Ete te. beverages of any kind or violate the Prohibation laws 1, Appgarance Ly gel "tata sh $500.00 ad judged suffictent. any way. '&§ 6 defendan 8 &llowe O days in which to make y and serve statement of case on eppeal, and the State . allowed 30 days thereafter to serve countercase or file exceptions. SI Se ae No. 1099 MURDER State The Grand Jury returns in open Court in a Body, (sixter vs present) a True Bill of Indictment charging the defenin Edgar W. Linney Edgar W. Linney, with the capital offense of Murder {n words and figures as follows: Noe 108 PROSTITUTION 7 ? Nol Prossed "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA vs ld Lambert IREDELL COUNTY Dona SUPERIOR 01 MAY TERM, 133 = nn ne No. 1104 State vs Ee. Ee Barbee Wel5 No. 1LO7U0& 10 State a Vs George A. Hung W-23 ? THE JURORS FOR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESEN?: That Edgar W. Linney late of the County of Iredell, on th 30 day of January A. D. 1948, with force end arms, at ani in the said County, unlawfully, willfully, fe lontously, ay of his malice aforethéught, did kill and murder Oscar Rost contrary to the form of the statute in such case made an provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State, John R. McLaughlin Solicitor, "No. 1099 STATE VS Edgar V. Linney INDICTMENT MURDER Witness X He P. Lackey x De He Abernathy Oscar Bost Mary E. Holmes X Martha Bellamy Those marked X sworn by the un- dersigned for eman, and examired before the Grand Jury, and this bill found 4 True BpillIre D. Hefner : Foreman of the Grand Jury EMBE 221 Mun? The defendant through his attorney, W. R. Battley enters a plea of Nolo Contendre. n fi It is judgment of the Court that the defendmt be 0 Wo north? Central Prison at Raleigh for not less th TWO nor more than FOUR YEARS. h sente pint, With the consent of the defendant, this pris ntence is suspended for a period of FIVE YEARS upont Fonjowl ng conditions: 1. Thet he pay the cost of the action at this ter™ 2. Thet he be and ot 4s 1d remain for andn Violate any of the laws of the State or ane United Ste” de That he p8y into the office of the Ce Se Co for benefit of the prosecuting witness on or before the July Term of Ipede11 County Superior Court the sum of $349-” SS T WITH DEADLY WEAPON siadee defendant through his attorney Hugh G. mitchel? not guilty, Jury sworn and empanelled return y of Larceny and Assault on Female. k under the superv Works Commission. xt page #115) /2) impris™ NOe 1090 & x29x State vs Edward Mullinax W-23 No. 1091 State vs Edward Mullinax No. 1092 & 1093 State vs J. Sam Brawley W- & we g No, 10d) State Vs kddie Joine g Yo 30 LAR CENY The defensant thro ugh his attorney, James R. 3urgess enters. a plea of guilty as charged, Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common Jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the state Highway and Public Works Commission. LARCENY OF AUTO" OBILE The defendant through his attorney, James R. Burgess enters a plea of guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant he confined in the Central Prison at Raleigh for a period of not less than TWENTY-FOUR nor more than THIRTY-SIX MONTHS. By and with the consent of the defendant in open Court, this prison sentence is suspended for FIVE YEARS from this date on condition that the defendant be of good behavior, follow some gainful occupation, not violate any of the laws of the State. Caplas and commitment to put the foregoing sentence ine to effect at any time upon motion of the Solicitor. IMPROPER REGISTRATION The defendant through his attorney tenders ea plea of — of inproper registration of an automobile, which plea the State accepts. These two cases consolidated dor Judgment. Judgment of the Court is thet the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHTEEN MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and public Works Commission. By and with the consent of the defencant in open court, this sentence is suspended for a pericc of TWO YEARS on condition that the defendant not violate any of the laws of the State of North Carolina, particularly the motor vehicle Act, and that he pay a fine of $25.00 and the cost at this term of Court. Capiass and commitment to issue at any time to put the foregoing sentence into effect upon motion of the Solicitor. NON=SUPPORT The defendant through his attorney, J. G. Lewis enters & plea of guilty of non-support of an illegitimate child. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for e period of SIX MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the state Highway and Public Works Commission. This sentence is Suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That he pay the cost of this action at this term of the Court and the sum of $300.00 to Viola Benfield for the support and maintenance of the illegitimate child, Linda Jean Benfield, and the sum of $10.00 per month, commencing the lst day ¢ June, 193, and continuing monthly thereafter until the further sum of $700.00 is paid in full. Upon breach of any of the foregoing conditions, capias and commitment to issue upon motion of the Solicitor. It appears to the Court that the $300.00 payment has been made to the prosecuting witness at this time. - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT UPERIOR COURT oat THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK - MAY TCIM, 1948 Monday, May 17th, 1948 uesday Morning, May 18th, ble Court convene , 1087 & 1088 DRUNK AND DISORDER LY This Honorabl “i ween aunerdine i wietiew, ieee: nee Ba Nol Pros With Leave vs Roy overcash toe 1094 BREAKING, ENTERING AND LARCENY Noe 1106 MUR VER Nol Pres With Leave ie > he Grand Jury returns in open Court in a body State State testtien aeeeant a True Bill of Indictment charging vs vs janes si xe defendant Quince Mathis, with the capital offense Rozella G quince Mathis oP waster in words and figures as follows: "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUP}LRIOR OOURT Yo. 1079 = ie f A é@ prisoner, Charlie House b “ on IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 19)8 _ Court ih his own proper pore’ ete THE JURORS FOK TIE STATE UPON THEIR OATH PRESENT: Charlie Houser ae... of =e County, whose prisoner he is, said - That quince Mathis late of the County of Iredell, on tl ot ee x cnet oe rig cautioned by the Court of his |, day of April A. De, 1948, with force and arms, at sx g a ;.onges of jurors, pre-emptory and for cause, in the ssid County, wilessuliy, sitieuly, fe lontously, a oo defendant's counsellors, Messrs W. R. Battley and and of his malice aforethdéugh, did kill and murder ons Je G. Lewis, being present in open Court, the following jury John Hill contrary to the form of the statute in such was duly drawn, sworn and empanelled in this case: to-wit: a nd viced, and against the peace and dizi: - case mace 4@ pro ’ B Pp ° W. Be. Chambers Ke Hute Sloan Le C. Redmond of the State. W. A. Sloop W. Ralph Grose Blake Cibson John Re R. E. Warren Ge F. Barnes Joe A. Cashion Re Je Calloway W. C. Woody Ce. Ee. Fox "No 1106 After empanelling the twelve jurors above selected STATE a thirteenth juror was selected, to-wit: W. W. White, and ve the entire jury was again empanelled. ig nee The defendant through his counsel moves that he be “ . . permitted to withdraw his plea of not guilty and ten ers oy to the Court a pleaof ¢ullty of Manslaughter, which plea wpe the State accepts. AUN LE The judgment of the Court is that the defendant he con- fined in the Central Prison at Raleigh for a term of not less than FIVE nore more than SEVEN YEARS at hard labor, to wear stripes. Witness Ae He Clark Caper gtrickland Elmer Yackson Grace Nell Hill Mery Lizzie Strickland eee artes edi a “. Those marked X sworn by the un- dersigned, foremen, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found The Grand Jury met in regular session Monday, May 17, ld, and A TRUE BILL Ire D. Hefner ; Foreman of the Grand Jurye passed on a1] Bills coming before same. oe ogee ogee Vn nee al fees Sinner EO: _ - - eS om — - ft Th ee apenas SO cee cee Se SP BT Te - = We visited the County Home, County Jail, Court House and grounds, also 7 * ON Dt LE OF LIEN RE SL OT State Prison Camp. Visits being made by committees. COUNTY HOME- Mr. FP. M. Bell, Chairman Found the County iiome in good condition and having in the home wh , ite women, 19 white men, 7 colored women, 7 colored men, also |; prison y ‘elpers. Mr. Sherrill ts doing a fine job at the Home. The Grand Jury recommends tha . t the County Commissioners consider a milking machine and freezer unit for the County Home . COUR HOICw » THOUSE & JAIL- Mr, We S. Martin, Chairman Found the County Jail in very good condition, also the Court House and of flees. Work that was recommended last court has been done or underway. STATE PRISON cayp- Mr. We P, Blackwelder, Chairman This Honorable ¢ ) jth ourt takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, May 10% Visited the Prison Camp and found everything there in fine condition. 1948 at 9:30 O'Clock. SIGNED: IRA D. HEFNER oreman May 18, 19,8 THE : UR IN THE SUPERIOR MURT 1S? Wek ~ MAY TERI 1948 FIRST WEEK + MAY TERM; 1948 F ue sday, May 18th, $9148 Wednesday, May 19th, 19),8 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Wednesday NO. 1026 , — May 19th, 1948 at 9:30 A. M. NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERDR yorning, May , IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1948 to. 1065 & 1066 FORGERY an "State The Jury returned a verdict of NoT GUILTY. Vs . . "i Ross R. Rogers Gwyn Chambers. oe 1006 State my, 2 » yn , ) } r ¢ vs This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, and it appearing to gen Guffy Mann. C ne P Ww + } . } : 3 ? I it} » - ¢ the Court that the oS Coser be: automobile: One 1935 Plymouth Coach, tn the matter of One 194.0 mUVVS FP 2 ait 9 w2er a ire D4V | 0 ; : Mode 1 Ford Coupe, Eng ne was selzed with a load of non-tax-paid whiskey: No. 1805523085. it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the said Automod! ls oe condemned and ordered sold by the Sheriff of I[redell County, 4s now provided by This cause coming on to be heard upon the foregoing testimony sno 4 a Vv J if i J ai 4 o . ies s i Atl lawe LO Charles Le. Cogri the Court finding the above statements to be a fact, ad it snpearinz to narles e rin Judge Presiding. intoxicating liquor, and it also appearing to the Court that the in ervenor rearl §. Beaver, failed to appear and prosecute her cause: FORGERY . it is, therfore, considered, ordered and Adjfudwed thi The defendant comes into open Court and through his Met a , . - © Attorney J lewis enters a p ot gu } i eli Mig wis e@ rs 4 plea of not gutlty, automobile be, and the same 1s hereby condemned, confiscated and vury sworn and empanelled,. Pending tria 18 C s un Wednesday s : 2 ; ‘i MYormnine. — 1 the Court takes a recess until We , sold by the Sheriff of Iredell County &s now provided by law. Uys ‘Se 7 Charles L. Cozrin Judve Presiding. FALSE PRETENSE The defendant through his attorneys, W. 'e I. Woodson enters a plea of not gulty. The Court in its discretion withdraws a fi ror and orders ® mistrial and the case continued for the term, at the sugrcese- tion of the Solicitor ard the private prosecution. This case continued until August Term, 193. —” DRIVING DRUNK vs The defendant through his attorney, W. RK. Battley James 4, Sie habesiae ones a plea of not guilty. i ele undies W=25 745 0pher ; ary sworn and empanelled and returned a verdict of not guilty. No, Staten POSSESS LIQUOR Vs The defendant enters a plea of guilty as cherged. Hoody Milis Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- 0=2% fined in the common ‘ail of Iredell County for eae period of TWELVE MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and Public, Works. Commission. This sentence is to begin at’ Bhyhen¢ence thet he is This Honorable Court takes «a recéss until now serving. 1943 at 9:30 O'Clock. Wednesday Morning, y ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued for the Defendant No. 1099 Stete vs kdger We Linney C-25 ll ; . 11( Go State Vs +ue GeAre cShew, 17 Floyd W, Bennet t-16 Clyde E. Messick. 16 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK - MAY TERM, 198 Wednesday, May 19th, 1918 MURDER 089 The defendant Groen TAC ORE CONE By ONG De wh yc my 4 Noe 1 MiexEex Bettbeycenters a plea of guilty of Mans leughtep wht : state plea the State accepts. Meh os Judgment of the Court Is that the defendant be confines Jess Ce Kidd in the common jail of Iredell County for »s period of not : w-l,0 than TWENTY-FOUR nor mae than THIRTY-SIX MONTES, assigned tt to work under the supervision of the State Highway end Public Works Commission. This sentence igs to comme : nee the expiration of the sentence he is now serving, " No. 1070 & 3073 State .aQ TIIT™ Wren nr "TV \ ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEA P As to the defendant L With Leave. The deferdant Tennie Passon through his Attorney, ! Mitchell enters e plea of guilty as charged. As to the defendant Tennie Passon Judgment of the Court {is that the defendsnt be confined in the Central Prison at Raleigh, Women's Division, for a term of TWELVE MONTHS, By and with the consent of the Geferndant, this sentence is suspended upon the following conditions: 1. That she be and remain of good behavior for @ perio of TWO YSARS end not violete any of the laws of the State, ee Theat she pey the cost of this action at this terr of Court. a » vs N George A Hugst ‘ U eKoy Sheppard his case is Nol Prog ,..° rhat she pay the sum of $290 200 to Mr. Bolmer at Moores ville at the followin: rate: $25. 10 to be paid imredietely, and the i t 000 to be paid at the rate of $25,00 @nd payable on the 20th day of each months 417 . 8A -S fully paid. S29 , DeY "+ LAR CE NY The defen ant plea of guilty of Temperory Larcer:, Judgment of the Court 1s that thedeferdant be impr iened the common {ail of Iredell] County, to work at the County in dome for e@ period of EI ‘HT MONTHS if the defercant leaves th $2 2ic institution or is unsatisfactory then the remainder of *S sentence is to be served on the roads. MURLERK The _ defendant throuc} an ‘ z ABS +4 . s 3attlev entara ee 1 se oavtiey enters @ plea of cu lty of Manslaughter. Judgmant of the fourt is ‘. an c that the defencant be imprisonec 1 , - mAT. ? aa , > ee ys ‘18 common Jail of Iredell County for e period of not le: than TWENTYy- sIX nor more than TH IRTY-SIX MONTHS, essignec te Ww rb MWwNHAa , b @ y YY 3 } i work under the supervision of the State Highway end Public orks Commission, is attorneys, Je Ge Lewis end i. i. 4 Wey \n At? ORT TY ahd a 4.U LU MOP ‘ m, - : Us ne cefencdaent ey - ee ters ® plea of guilty of Temporory Larettt ~s ent of the vourt is that the defendant be imprisoned the “ i. ea ETA ** “an er Jeil of Iredell County for « period of EIGHE \ Sc 2 . Highway pea ne, -o Work under the supervision of the State ‘lghway and Public Works Cc fon is to bani ce ca S Commission. ‘This senterce 1s to te Gin ne expiration of any sentence that he is now serv or may have te ser b J Au ’ y) z . vw Serve by Parole Commission. BREAKING, ENTERING ANT LARCENY The defendants enters a 1 ; ea o har ed. wu ae” the Court is that ong ofthe defer siants 7 a ae ; the common jail of Iredell County for 4 perio’ The vrisom Sto work at the lst offenders f the defen ants, for a p sentence {gs suspended as to each of the defer oe Period of FIyE YEARS, and the defendants are * ON probation upon the conditions set forth in this Judgment u fis probation.” ‘urther conditions set forth in the order ° Oo at ; special conditions of probation ordered by tH office of the croemts and each of them shall: pay into tl $10.4; of tht lerk Superior Court Iredell County the a 8nd $2.77 to th seid amount $6.67 to be paid to Pal Ling” damages ineurrea ra Pe pper Bottling Co. of Statesville [7 On or before the first qeeer seme nt 3 this amount to be Pe mine) Court for Iredell i 7 ae i er wi Thig * 10:00 Otetoek a, ¥. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK - MAY TERM, 4948 Wednesday, May 19th, 19 SPEEDING The defendant enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled, returned a verdict of guilty as charged. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant pay a fine of $50. and pay the cost of this action. ; LARCENY AND ASSAULT WITH DUADLY WEAPON TJudgment heretofore made in this case is hereby stricken out and the following entered in lieu thereof: Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprison- ed in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of FIFTScN MONTHS and assigned to work at the County Farm or Home. If the derendant leaves the said institutton or is unsatisfactory then the remainder of said sentence is to be served on the roads, it 1s ordered by the Court that the money taken from the person of the defendant and introcuced as evicence in the case be turned back to the proscuting witness Audrey I. James. Q(t’ 3 vc ten Honorable Court tekes a recess until Monday Morning, May 2th, 1948, al Cag ees urn a Ee ee aad IN THE SUPERIOR COUR SECOND WEEK - MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2th, 1948 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1948 This Honoreble Court conveesaccording to adjournment On Monday Morning, May 2lith, 1948 at 10:00 O'Clock, with Honorable Cherles Le Coggin, Judge Presiding and Holdirg Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District present and presiding, and Honorable John R. McLaughlin, Solicitor and Proséy, ing Attorney for the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, is Dre sent prosecuting in the name of the State, We D. Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into Open Court nemes of the following good and lawful men to serve &s jurors for this Second Week of the May Term, 198, Iredell Superior Court, to-wit: Le «ae varks Ge Ce Combs HH. Brown Bill C. Smith Ce Le Donaldson R. E. Hilderbran We Ce Lunsford We R. Tilley F. Re McLaughlin Miss Prances Nicholson Re Ae Gaither Don Barker Relph Se. Moore Mrse Roxie Be. Austin L. Me Nesbit We Se Murdock Ce. Be Hines W. He Johnston Se Be White Miss Dorothy McLain Re A. Edwards Mervin We Smith Be t, Deal We Le Gryder Le Ae Parks, Marvin We Smith, Mrs, Roxie B, Austin, C. B. Hines, F. Re Me Laughli: 1 Ye F "ke we b, and von Dar ki ar ere excused b y the Court + Ne Le Grvde e aE COr WAS excused on Doctor's certificate, NO. Lhvs NORTE CAR OL INA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL cou ry LA BELIE SUMMERS, Infant wie an friend, FURBY suMmERs Vase R. L. HECKARD This cause z coming on to be heard snc being heard before His Honor, Special Judge, pr unt » Presiding at the M 17, 1948 Term of Superi? parties have arrive Ys, and being heard and it sppane tna’ on tis Court thet the d at a the cour : settle ment of the Generar serge t havin walved en Cont the @Pproval and adjudication in o 8 of P€n Court pro -173 of | baka and having rth Carolina and having waleod ec seer’ trial oy otermine th os might hear the evidence, find the facts . 8nd all other irregularities having been ago the court that the plaintiff Sm n he Pur ; oe. &8 such the Clerk of Court of a = Personal injubies to the plaintiff, Lol ret ch happened to her on or about the ft the Plaintirr suffered iniurtes #8 ubes about hee ee Lous for five days, a fracture of th er face, body and legs and a handicap in Charles Ls . ” s ® minor day of July, IN TH® SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 198 Monday, May 2th, 19h8 king and other inguries necessitating medical and doctor bills and wal ; . pain and mental suffering; andit further appearing to the court ae om parties have agreed to compromise and settle the matters at issue = een them by the payment to the plaintiff by the defendant the sum of y D5 55 and the costs of this action, and desire the sanction and approval ert court in order to make such settlement binding, effective and valid by 0 ason of the plaintiff being a minor, and the court having investigated the Cae alle ged in the complaint and the facts involved in said personal injury a the purpose of ceterming whether or not it is to the best interest of the plaintiff, who was present in person in court,and her next friend and other ho have knowledge of the matters and things alleged in the complaint eater filed in this cause, and after such inves igation of the facts the court 1s of the opinion and finds as a fact that the settlement 18 fair and reasonable and for the best interest of the plaintiff that the matters at {esue be compromised and settled upon the terms agreed to between them ag here- in set oute It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DecRRED that the settlement ‘s just, fair and reasonable and for the best interest of the plaintiff, Lola Beile Summers, @ minor, that all matters at issue in the above entitled cause be compromised and settled upon the payment of the sum of $2925.55 in full dise- charge of e11 liabilities by reason of the matters set out in the complaint, and 811 other matters growing out of the injjry alleged. IT IS FURTHER ORDMRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREFD that the agreement made between the parties hereto to compromise and settle the matters at issue as aforesaid upon the payment of the aforesaid sum to the plaintiff by the defend- ant be and the seme is hereby in allrespects ratified and approved; and it is FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that by end with the consent of the perties hereto, the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendant in the sun of $2925.55 and the costs of this ection as settlement in full for all damages whatsoever, shich have arisen or which might hereefter arise by reason of the personal injuries described in the complaint and all other metters and things growing out of the accident alleged. And it is FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND CECPREED that uponthe peyment of said sum by the defendant, the said defendant shallbe forever discherged from all liabilities whatsoever which have arisen heretofore, or which might hereafter arise by reason of said injuries betweer. the plaintiff and the defend- ant. t 1s FURTHER ORDERED AND DECREED thet Raymer & Raymer be peld $350.00 out of this recovery as legal fees for representing the plaintiff which sum is st to be fair anc reasonable end the Clerk {s authorized to pay same to them. It 1s FURTHER OPNDERED AND DECPEED that out of this recovery the Clerk of the court pay to the following the amounts set Opposite their respective names in payment of their medical, doctors md hospital and nursing bills or to reimbur se parties for the prior payment thereof, as follows: Kate Bitting Reynolds Memorial Hospital, ‘inston-Salem, Ne Se Dr, Je M. Walker Purby Summers, reimbursenent for medical ®xpenses advanced 4.50.00 134 290 € e) This the 17 day of May, 19,3. Charles Le. Coggin Judge Consented to by: Lola Bell PITRE ers Deal 4 1 Hutchi : ne ‘torneys or Defendant ESE E TE EE Heat de Hae ahah Te He TNE Te Ub ae ede HEHEHE Hee SE TE eae are | “e ot Lt ? =e a N THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK- May Term, 1948 Monday, May 2lth, 194.8 The follwing men constitute what shall hereinafter be termed the Divorce Jury #1" to-wit: Bill C. Smith, W. C. Lunsford, Ralph s, Moore, vD z 1 ¥ 8 Murdock, 8. Be White, Ge Co combs, Cc. Le Donaldson, We R. Tilley, Re A. Gaither, Miss Dorothy Mclain, B. *. Deal and R. A. Edwards rT Ter t vl’ VIVUAGL The Divorce Jury #1", being duly sworn and empanel led answers the issues submitted to it as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR cou? MAY TERM, 1918 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? answer Yes 2. Did the plaintirr ane defendant separate, and have they lived ity. Separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the insti tion of this action, as alleged in the complaint? 4&nswer Yes . North 3+ Has the plaintirr been a Donifide resident of the State of North Carolina for mare than six months before the commencement of this action, 48 alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR © URT, IREDELL County, MAY TERM, 1948 Le Se Bell j V3. § Mevus M. Bell { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of tht Superior Court of Iredell) sounty, North Carolina, before His Honor, Charles Le 8ein, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to t+ by the Court in favor of dart, the plaintiff and against the defen 48 set out in the record: Lt is, of matrimon therefore, ora ered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds ¥Y heretofore existing 3 between the plaintiff, L. Ss. Bell, and the defendant, Mevus M, Bell, be, an nti! a the same are hereby dissolved, and the ye Charles L ee in udge Presiding: Teh SeH Se tese ot sgh stapen oe is ¢ ranted an edsolute divorce from the defendant Hebe ese db spas ay WI Sse se ge ae IN THE SUP'RIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - MAY TERY, 1948 Wonday, May 2th, 198 t No. 459 Hazel B. Witherspoon DIVORCE The Divorce Jur Vse empanelled answers as follows: y #1" being duly sworn ana the issues submitted to it Witherspoon Floyd Gilmer IN THE SUPERIOR COURT aE TY MAY TERM, 1948 : I Hezel Be Witherspoon VSe Floyd Gilmer Witherspoon le. Were plaintiff and the defendant married ard are now hushand and wife, as set out in the Complaint? Answer Yes 2. Has the plaintiff bean a resijent of Iredei} County, North Carolina for a period of six months, immediately prior to the commencement of v aa + this actLon? Answer Yes 4%. Has the Plaintiff, Hazel B, Withersppon, 11 lived separate from her husband, the defendant, for a period of two years prior to the commen ment of this actlon? ; " Answer Yes eee GARULINA AAT mes COUNT @ dazel B. Wit her spoon VSe floyd Gilmer Wither spoon " , 3 wi 7 heard at This cauge coming on to be heard, and } i neerda at ~ . » he we hanan ye 7 ° wuperior Court of Iredell} County, N. cefore his honor, Charles "a rr Ur « dks . ~* VOGELS, Judge Presi &» anda jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, 88 set out in the record: It 1s therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court, thet the bonds °f matrimony heretofore existing between the pleintiff, Hazel B. Witherspoon and the defendant Floyd Gilmer Witherspoon, be and the same are hereby dissolved, ‘nd the pleintire ts granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Charles L. Sah ! uv Tee TEM Bei te se Sethe thse ese dese see sb hE te Ht IN THE SUPERIOR a iais SECOND WEEK - MAY TERM, Monday, May 2th, 1948 NO. 461 Charlie R.Rector _— DIVO The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and ©mpane) leg answers the issues submitted to it as follows: ' 4 Vs. : 4 4 Blanche Rector NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT SPRING TERM, 198 Charlie R. Rector § Plaintiff 4 vs j Blanche Rector q Defendant. § 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married to each other, ag alley in the complaint? A. Yes e. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action, as alleged in the complaint? A. Yes 3e Have the plaintiff ana defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years next before the bringing of this action, as alleged in the Complaint” A. Yes NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUP=RIOR OURT. IREDELL COUNTY. Charlie R. Rector Plaintiff Vs. Blanche Rector Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before bis honor, Charles L, Coggins, + Court, the following issues were submitted to and found bv the 1. Jury: in the Complaint? A. Yes, e. Has the Plaintiff been a dona fide resident of the State & North Cerolina for six months next Preceding the » d ringing of this action, 48 allegé in the Complaint? “Ae Yes, 36 Have the Plaintiff ana defendant lived separate and apart from each other fop two years next be in the Complaint? Ae Yes, and a Jury, at the May Term, 1948, of Iredell County Supt!" Were the plaintirr and defendant married to each other, as alles IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2hth, 1948 If IS, THEREFORE, on Motion of Tressie Pierce Fletcher, Attorney for the plaintiff, considered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony now existing between plaintiff and defendant, be, and the same are, hereby dissolved, and the laintiff 1s hereby granted an absolute divorce. P IT IS FURTH!R ORDERED, that the plathtirr pay the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk. Charles L Cogzin Judge Presiding, Statesville, N. C. May 2th, 194.86 Hct: BETES TEE TTS TE Te te Sete te ese thse SeseS 46 Now yO J. Be Hall Bumgarner DIVORCE ¥8< The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it Beatrice R. Bumgarner as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPFRIOR COURT Je Be Hall Bumgarner Vs. Beatrice Re. Bumgarner 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes e. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived seperate and apart from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes 3+ Has theplaintifr been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY ae 194.8 Monday, May 2ith, 19 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County J. B. Hall Bumgarner vs Beatrice Rf Bumgarner This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Chatles Le. Coggin, Judge Presiding and a jury at the May Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the defendant ha; been personally served with procees, and the following issues having been gub. mitted to and answered by the jury: 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant lawfully married as alle ged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes", 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart fr each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "Yes", 3. Has the plaintirr been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: "yes", Now therefore, on motion of Macon M. Simons, attorney for the plaintit it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff J. B. Hall Bumgarner & anc he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant Beatrice R. Bumgarner and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the ples and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved. And it is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk, This the 2lth day of May, 198, Charles Le. Coggin Judge Presiding 1 Tee ete Sete te thst te IN THE SUPRIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2hth, 19/8 no» 465 H. Campbe ay Gracie DIVORCE i The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to it Harvey Campbell, Jr. as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY Gracie He Campbell IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 198 ) j Vs. 9 4 j Harvey Campbell, Jre 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complairt ? Answer. Yes. @. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than one year next precéding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes. 3- Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or mare as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Y@S-e NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUP-RIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1948 Gracie H. Campbell VSe Harvey Campbell, Jr. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the way Term, 1943 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Charles L. Cog-in, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the Jury having answered the issues sub- mitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and ageinst the defendant, as fully aprears in the record; It 1s, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimong heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and ne the same fre, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute Givorce from the defendm t. This the 2), day of May, 1948. Charles L Coggin Judge Presiding EME BETTE Te TES TET ESE ERNE Ee SEE ee He EE Sea Sn ETS aaneapuasialafigaids IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 198 Monday, May 2th, 1948 Noe 1466 « McKa Robert B. okay DIWRCE . Vs The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn ang empane) ; answers the issues submitted to it as follows, Eileen King McKay NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cour? IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1948 RKobert He McKay ISSUES8 Vse Eileen King McKay I. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alle ged in th Complaint? Answer. Y@S-~. 2@. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Caroline for more than one year next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer: Yes. 3- Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period answer. Yes. WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR Cour? IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1948 Kobert H. McKay Vs. Lileen King McKay This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the May Term, 1948 Superi or Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Charles L. Coggin, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having *o 1t in the favor of the plaintifr and against the defendant, as fully appr in the record ; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matri mony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, # the sume are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolut! divorce from the defendant, This the 2) day of May, 1943, es Charles L Coggin Judge Presiding Woe ee Se sb ab Se 5p te bs Pie Use te shag Te REE eee Te ese se seTE of two years or more as alleged in the Complsir' answered all the issues submittt IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2th, 1948 NOo 469 Helen D. Lackey DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues Submitted to it Lloyd Wayne Lackey as follows: NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPSRIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1948 Helen D. Lackey VSe Lloyd Wayne Lackey 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than one year next preceding the filing of this Complaint? Answer. Yes. 3- Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff ana have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. YeSe NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREMLL COUNTy MAY TERM, 193 Helen D. Lackey Vs. JUDGM Lloyd Wayne Lackey This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the May Term, 1943 Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Charles L. Cogyin, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the Jury having enswered all the issues sub- mitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully & pears in the record; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute alvoree from the defendant. Charles L Coggin Judge rresiding *-- RENE th ie eth tet ete ese tk th te te ee se Sese te ese Sede ek EE ee ee oe ee ee on arte all agin -- eS a ae + epee ger gree * ron ow oceans canaih ttc Pe eo Re a ep We ee ate He IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2th, 19) Noe 471 Alice Sebastian Applehans DIVORCE Vs. The Divorce Jury #1" being duly swor empanelled answers the issues submitted as follows: Nn and to Edward J. Applehans it NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT, IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1948 Alice Sebastian Applehans Vs. ISSUES Ldward Je Applehans 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Did the defendant commit adultery, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3+ Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action, as alleged in the comple int? Answer: Yeas. NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR CUURT, IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1948 4 4 “ye Alice Sebastian Applehans Vse Ldward J. Applehans This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Verolina, before His Honor, Charles ls Coggin, Judge Pres r " BE AN, ge Fresiding, and a jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to y the c t th it by the Court in favor of the pleintiff and agains 6 defendety 8s set out in the record: it i : , 8, therefore, ordered and adjudved by the Court that the bonds of matrimo mony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Alice sebastian Applehe:s and the defor. . ant, Edward J, Applehan s, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the pleint ‘ pis intiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Charles L. Coggin Judge Presiding. - We se te OW WI od» Sede as tx Sk the ‘ “—o “3 +4 ap de dt. ie : Pt oe d4 " WW Vet Tete F We ese ese TES eet ss te IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 198 Monday, May 2hth, 1948 o~ No» 472 E. Meadows j wii tem {DIVORCE Vs. § The Divorce Jury #1" jempanelled answ gas follows: being duly sworn ana ers the issues submitted to it dows armetta Mize Mea YORTH CAROLINA, ROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT, IREDELL TY. MAY TERM, 1948 William E. “eadows ™ ISSUES Armetta Mize Meadows 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant mar:y each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate, and have they lived separate and apart from each other for more than two years prior to the institu- tion of this action, as alleged in the compleint? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina, for more than six months before the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes. NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superlor Court, IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 19kc¢. “illiam E, Meadows V8. Arpmetta Mize Meadows This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the § Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Cherles L, Coggins, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, es set out in the record: It 18, therefore, ordered, and adjudzed by the Court that the bonds Of matp lmony heretofore existing between the pleintiff, William E. Meadows, 8d the defendant, Armetta Mize Meadows, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, 4nd the Plaintirr is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Charles L Cogin Judge Presiding. We ESSE SESE He MELE TE SEAT TENE ESE TE SE EMH aE He IE EERE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2l\th, 194.8 No. 73 David Smith ' DIVORCE mn Vs. The Divorce Jury #1" bd ng duly sworn and answers the issues submitted to it as fol : Ane) )¢4 Sein * Ne l}e4 Lettie B. Smith NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY [IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT David Smith Vs. ISSUES lettie Be Smith 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in thy complaint? Answer. Yes 2. Has the plaintiff lived in the State of North Carolina for one year next preceeding the conmencement of this action? Answer. Yes 3- Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years proceeding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes NORTH CakOLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IKED:LL COUNTY David Smith Vs. lettie B. Smith Charles L Coggin This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, &xxWkikxRiassp7i, Presiding Jude, and e jury, at the May Term, 198 of the Iredell County, Superlor Court, and the case having b 66n submitted to a jury and the jury having answered the issues &s contained in the records in favor of the plaintiff and agains 6 p 7 nst th defendant, [It is, the f : a i, ij ; i 3 jecreed that the bonds of ( ma rimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant bey and they y ‘ey are hereby, dissolved and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divore from the defendant, The plaintiff is texedq with the costs of this action. Charles L, Coggin Presiding Judge IN THE SUPERIOR court SEDND WEEK-- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2lth, 1948 NOo yy74, . es vary BE. Holm DIVORCE Va. The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submitted to 1t as follows: pdward Holme s NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT vary Ee Holmes VSe Edward Holmes 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the compleint? Answer. Yes 2. Has the plaintiff lived in the state of North Carolina for one year next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes 3. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apert from each other for two years proceeding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes. NORTH CaROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Wary E. Holmes Vs. JUDGMEN Edwerd Holmes This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Charles L. Coggin, Presiding Judge, and a jury, at the May Term, 198, of the Iredell County Superior Court, and the case having been submitted to a jury and the jury having answered the issues as contained in the records in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and d *fendant be, and they are hereby, dissolved and the plaintiff is granted an ab Solute divorce from the defendant. The plaintiff is taxed with the costs °f this action, Charles L. Coggin Presiding Judge PER eT Ge EE Le ETE TENE BETE TENE SE SESE HE Sb EE TENE TE ESE ee eee EME ' | i | Hl Fit Bi Rh ! | a. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -~ MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2th, 1948 NOe 76 bller, Sr. Robert Lee E ’ » DIVORCE Ve The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and enpeng)) . answers the issues submitted to it as follows . Ellen Loulse Eller, North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. Robert Lee Eller, Sr., Plaintiff, Vs. Ellen Loube Eller, Defendant. 1. Did the plaintiff, Robert Lee Eller, Sr., and the defendant, ills Louise Lller, intermarry as alleged in the compasint? ANSWER Yes. 2. Have the plaintiff, Robert Lee Eller, Sr., and the defendant, Ellen Louise Eller, lived separate and apart from each other for two consecut!n years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? ANS"ER Yes. 3e Has the plaintiff, Robert Lee Eller, Sr., been a bona fide resicent of the State of North Carolina for one year immediately preceding the commencement of this acticn? ANS’ER Yes, NORTE CAROLINA, In the Superior Court TIRED: LL COUNTY. May Term, 1948 kobert Lee Eller, Sr., Plaintiff, Vs. Ellen Louise Eller, Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor Cherlt! L. Coggin, Judg © Presiding, and a jury, at the May Term, 198, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, tte! and the following issues having been subs! to, and answered, by the jury, to-wit; 1. Die the Plaintiffs, Robert Louise Eller, intermarry a inner Yon y 8s alleged int lee Eller, Sr., and the defendant, Blt he complaint ? Ce Ha Louise Eller, ve the Plaintirr, Robert Lee E lived sepa» t immediately prior to the sia ANSVER Yes, pie ller, Sr., and the defendant, rf Spart from each other for two consecutive J commencement of this action? 4e Has the of the State Of North Bee eitt of this action? ANSWER Ye 8. » Robert Lee Eller i... & fide reside ° een a bona net Carolina for One year Immediately preceding the commencé IN THE SUPERIOR goURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 19),8 Monday May 2th, 1948 The Court finds from the Complai nt ana the Affidavit filea by the plaintiff, that the defendant, Ellen Louise Eller, was not at the tine of the institution of this action, is not now, nor has she been since the institution of this action, in the militery service of the United States of america, ghe Court further finds that summons in thig action was issued by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 6th day of March, 1948, and was served personally on the defendant, “lien Louise Eller, on varch 6, 1948, by Wade Moore, Deputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, by reading the summons to the defendant, and by leaving with her a copy of the summons, and a copy of the Complaint. IT IS, THEREFOIE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, That the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Robert Lee Eller, Sr., and the defendant, Ellen Louise Eller, be, and they are, dissolved, and the plaintiff, Robert Lee Eller, Sr., is grarted an absolute divorce from the defendant Ellen Louise Eller. Let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff. This the 2lth day of May, 1948. Charles L Cogrin Judge Presiding. NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 1948 Robert Lee Eller, Sr., Plaintiff, Vs. ORDER FOR CUSTODY OF MiNOR CHID : J Ellen Louise Eller, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard,and being heard by His Honor Charles Le Cogein, Judge Presiding at the May Term, 198, Superior Court for Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court, and the Court finding 88 @ fact; le That one child was born to the SEREOAG? WORED SNE The sintnneer and defendant, viz: 1933, Robert Lee Eller, Jr., a son, born on the 25th day of May, 2. That the minor child, Robert Lee Eller, Jr., is now living with the 1 Piaintire, his father, and is being supported by the plaintiff. 56 And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact tha t the Plaintirr is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -*t- MAY TERM, 19,8 Monday, May elith, 1948 the minor child, Robert Lee Eller, Jr., and that the best interest Of satq child would be served by him being in the custody of his father, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: L. That the plaintiff be, and he is hereby granted full m@ Complety custody and control of Robert Lee Eller, Jr., the aforesaid minor child, 2. This cause is retained for such further orders as may be Just me It further appears to the Court that the above entitled action was brought by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant on the ground of two years separation, and for the custody of the aforesaid minor child, and that a judgment granting the plaintiff an absolute divorce from th cefendant has already been entered at this term of Iredell County Superior (oy:, This the 2hth day of May, 198. Charles L Coggin Judge Presiding, NO. 477 Helen M. Adams DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empane] led answers the {ssues submitted to it as follows: Vs. William Rs Adams NORTH CAROLINA , [IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MaY TERM, 1948 Helen M. Adams V8.6 William E, Adams 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alle ged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes, “+ Has the pleintirr been @ resident of the state of North Carolin ¥ , >} . of more than one year next Precedirg the filing of this Complaint? answer, Yés 3. YD id the defendant Separate from the plaintiff and have they lire Separate and apart for a per Lod of t wo years or more ag alleged in the Complai«! Answer, Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - MAY TERY, 1948 Monday, May 2hth, 1948 NORTH CAROLINA {N THE SUPERIOR COURT IREIELL COUNTY MAY TERM, 1948 Helen M. Adams VS. William Ee Adams This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the May Term, 198, Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor Charles L. Coggin, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues sub- mitted to it in the favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears in the record; and it appearing to the Court that there was born of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant two children, Reathe Adams and Gloria Adams; and that the plaintiff herein has the care and custody of said children; and it further appearing tothe Court and the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the minor children, Reathe Adams and Gloria Adams, and that the best interest of said minors would be served by being in the custody of their mother, she deine found to be a fit person for the cusoty of seid minors. It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bones of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the sam are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute ‘ivoree from the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, Helen M. Adams, be and she is hereby awarded full and complete caré, custody and control of the minor children, Reatha Adams and Gloria Adams. This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor children, is retained for further orders. his the 2) day of May, 1948. Charles L Cogein Judge Presiding re : V pee (PS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 194.8 Monday, May 2th, 1948 No. 478 Robena White Howard DIVORCE — Vs. The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and em answers the issues submitted to it as follows: ut Robert Howard NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. LN THE SUPERIOR COURT, May Term, 19],8 Robena White Howard Vs. Robert Howard 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and wife, as alle zed in the complaint? Answers: Yese 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant separate and have they lived separate andapart from each other for more than two years prior to the institut: of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 4- Has the plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of sort Varodlina for more than six months before the commencem:nt of this action, as alleged in the complatirt 9 answer: Yes, NORTH CAKOLINA, IN THE SUPERIOK COURT. [KEDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1948 Robena White Howard { Vs. Q Kobert Hovard This cause coming ' ming On tobe heard and being heard at this Term of th Superior Court of [redell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, Charles Coggin, Judge Presta ing, and a jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted t h + © it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defen &s set out in the record; It 4 , . 5S, therefors ordered, anda adjudged by the Court that the ponds of matrimony heret ofore existing between the plaintiff, Robena White Howard, the defendant ; » Robert Howard, be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and plaintiff is 2ran ted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Cha: les L. Ccoggit a u ge res ng+ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 198 Monday, May 2hth, 19h8 NOo 479 . Caldwell Hattie M DIVORCE ti anaworo the issuoa’ submitted po Hy Seren ta, gomanedied Frank Co Caldwell NURTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY MAY TERI, 1948 Hattie M. Caldwell VSe Prank C. Caldwell 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the States of North carolina for more than one year next preceding the filing of this Com slaint? Answer. YeS. 3. Did the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they lived separate and apart for a period of two years or more as alleved in the Complaint? Answer. YeS. NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY tattle M. Caldwell {4 vs. ' JUDGMENT Prank C. Caldwell This cause coming on to be heard and being heard et the May Tern, 1945, Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Cherles L. Cog;in, vudge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered all the issues sub- mitted to it in the favor of the plainti ff and against the defendant, es fully appears in the record; the and it appearing to the Court that there was born of marriaze of the plaintiff and the defendant a child, James Franklin Caldwell, and na that the plaintirr herein has the care and cus tody of said child; and it “urther “ppearing to the Court and the Court finds as a fact that tle plaintiff lg , @ fit and Sultadle person to have the custody and control of the minor child, Jame . § Franklin Caldwell, and that the best interest of said minor would be serve d by being in the custody of his mother, she being found to be a fit person f °F the custody of said minor. it 1s, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matr i: mony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the "® hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute Elvope ® from the defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the pie intl, Hattte M. Caldwell, be and she is hereby awarded full md complete IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - MAY TERM 194.8 Monday, May 2th, 1948 care, custody and control of the minor child, James Franeklin Caldwell, This cause, in so far as it relates to the custody of the minor child, is retained for further orders. This the 2 day of May, 1948. CharlesL. Cogrin Judge Presiding BE WEE Te TEI TENS Tee Tete eT Noe yhoh Willie McClain DIVORCE 0 The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and ©mpane lleg { answers the issues submitted to it as follows: 0 Vs [Isabella McClain NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Willie McClain Vs. Isabella McClain 1. Did the plaintiff end the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff lived in the State of North Carolina for one year next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes de Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart from each other for two years preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes NURTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY Willle MeGlain ! Vs. T u [Isabella McClain { This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Charles L. Coge*% Presiding Judge, and a jury, Qyner it? at the May Term, 198, of the Iredell County ‘ourt, and the case naving been submitted to a jury and the jury having answer the issues as contained in the records in favor of the plaintiff and against defenda; TORENT, &8 is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore @xisti are | b neredy, dissolved ana the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. The Plaintiff igs taxed with the costs of this ection. Charles L. Coggin residing Judge OTe ee tede de sedy Tete Seth te sede 5e4¢ ng between the plaintirr and the defendant be, an? ™ IN THE SUPERIOR court SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2th, 1948 Nos 486 Baxter Ce Lippard, Sr. Plamtiff, Vs. DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelled answers the issues submittéd to it Lee Lippard, Bessie as follows: Defendant. ORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY In the Superior Court May Tem, 198 Baxter Ce Lippard, Sr. Plaintiff, Vs. Bessie Lee Lippard, Defendant. 1. Did the plaintiff, Baxter c, Lippard, Sr., and the defendant, Bessie Mae Lippard, intermarry as alleged in the comphaint? ANSW:R Yes. 2. Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? ANSYER Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff, Baxter C, Lippard, Sr., been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for two years immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANSWER Yes. NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 1948 Baxter C, Lippard, Sr., Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMENT Bessie Lee Lippard, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, ard being heard by His Honor Charles Le Coget n, Judge Presiding,and a jury et the May Tern, 19,3, Superior Court for lrede 11 County, North Carolina, and the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the jury, to-wit: Bossi 1. Did the plaintifr, Baxter C. Lippard, Sr. and the defendant, © lee Lippard, intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER Yes. <+ Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? ANSYVER Yes, 3+ Has the plaintiff, Baxter C. Lippard, Sr., been a bona fide Tesi “ent of the State of North Carolina for two years immediately preceding the Co meneement of this action? ANSWER Yes, — es oA Cog Domne |! SSE s a ats } Koil) lop iiin lis t—; | \ AGA i a HM | ‘ Be ; ett FRONT ——o —— i geo IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2ljth, 1948 The Court finds that summons in this action was duly serveg On the defendant by publication in the "Statesville Dailey," a newspaper pubiists , Iredell County, North Carolina, and that the last publication of said Sumnons was on the 15th day of April, 1943, and that the summons was duly Served an; th defendant was in Court as of the 22nd day of April, 198. The Court further finds from the affidavit of Baxter c, Lippard, gy % the plaintiff, that Bessie Lee Lippard, the defendant, was not at the time of the institution of this action, is not now, nor has she been sire the Anstitys:, of this action, in the military service of the United States of America, IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDHRED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that th bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are, dissolved, and that the plaintiff is granted an absolute atic, from the defendant. Let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintifys, This the 2th day of May, 1938. Charles L. Cogrin Judge Presiding. NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 198 Baxter C. Lippard, Sr., Plaintiff, Vs. ORDER FOR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN Bessie Lee Lippard, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor Charles L. Coggin, Judge Presiding at the May Term, 19,8, Superior Court for Tredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court, and the Court find as a fact: I. That elght children were born to the marria, ze union between the plaintiff ang defendant, their names and ages being as follows: Baxter C, Lippard, Urs, 20 years of az Beatrice thor’? 18 years of & ge. i , , ra - “ Clarence Lippard: 13 Fears of aa. pid Lippard, 11 years of ave, cerry Lee Lippard, 3 years of ave Brandon Lippard, 6 years of age. Judy Lippara, 5 years of age. SJ Fw Me . * * *e . . r eM ” 2. That all of the aforesaid minor ch , ildran are now living with — father, Baxter ¢, Lip pard, Sr., the Plaintiff in this action; that Baxter Ce Vallace Lippard, supporting themselves; that the oth Lippard, JYr., the two oldest children, are working, and é ®r six minor children are being maintaine IN THE SUPERIOR cour? SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 198 Monday, May 2th, 19),8 q supported by the plaintiff, their father, an 3. And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and control of the minor children, Baxter C. Lippard, Jr., Wallace Lippard, Beatrice Lippard, Clarence Lippurd, Irene Lippard, Jerry Lee Lippard, Brandon Lippara, and Judy Lippard, and that the best interest of said children would be served by them being in the custody of their father. IT {[S, THEREFORE, ORDERED, saDJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff be, and he is hereby germted full anda complete custody and control of Baxter C. Lippasrd, Jr., Wallace Lippard, Beatrice Lippard, Clarence Lippard, [rene Lippard, Jerry Lee Lippard, Brandon Lippard, ane Judy Lippard, the aforesaid minor children. 2. This cause is retained for such further orders as may be just and proper. “t further appears to the Court that the above entitled action was brotght by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant on the ground of adultery,ana sor une custody of the &foresaid minor chilcren, and that a judgment granting the plaintiff an absolute divorce from the defendant has already been entered at this term of Iredell County Superior Court. This the 2th day of Mey, 1945. Ctarles L. Cogrin Judge Presiding ees Aleit. lai a eta ~ aS i) ano uml Le t . IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WENKK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Nonday, May 2lth, 1948 No. h4od7 Ru Q De dPe . f D. Pp. Sharpe, DINOR CE vorce Jury #1" pris duly sworn ang é Vs answers the issues submitte Mpane) ea to it as follows: Mildred Pharis Sharpe NURTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR CouR? D. P. Sharpe, dr. Vse j Mildred Pharis Sharpe 1. Has the pleintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for six months prior to the instituion of this action, ag alleged in the compleint? Answer: Yes. 2. Were the plaintiff and defendant lawfully merried to each other, as alleged inthe compleint? answer: Yes, 4e Have the plaintiff ana defencant lived separate and apart from each other for two years prior to the institution of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 4e Was the separation without fault on the part of the pleintiff, # alleged in the complal nt? Answer: Yes, North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County, Le Pe Sharpe, JYre VS. “Lld,ed Pharts Sharpe. | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Charles L, Coggin, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the May Term, 198, of the “uperior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the de fen ant has been personally served with process, and the following issues having deen submitted to and answered by the jury: eit Rien oan ae at’ at been @ bona fide resident of the State —~ the complaint? “18 prior to the institution of this action, as alleged * Answer: "Yes". > er Ce Were the r a8 Alleged tn the “mse and defendant lewfully married to each other Answer: 3+ Have the other for two complaint? years pri a plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart fret ® or to the institutton of this action, as alleged in the . " Answer; Yes", IN THE SUPERIOR COUR? SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Monday, May 2hth, 1948 i Was at argtion without fault on the part of the plaintiff, in ec ° as alleged Answer: "Yes". It is, therefore, now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the pla intiff, D. Pe Sharpe, Jre, be and he is hereby grart ed an absolute divorce from the defend- ant, Mildred Pharis Sharpe, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing petween the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby absolutely dissolved and set aside. This 2) day Mey, 19d. Charles L. Cogzin Judge Presiding. No. 4492 NOR'H CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. karl Jr- Smith, a Minor, by His Next Friend, John C. Smith, Plaintiff, Vs. JUDGMEN Ae Je Honeycutt, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 198, of the Iredell County Superior Court, before His Honor, Charles L. Coggin, Judge Presiding, and was heard by the consent of the parties without a jury; that the causé was heard upon statements of counsel for both parties, the evidence submitted to the Court by a duly licensed physicien, md it appearing to the minor, Earl Jr, Smith, by his next friend and feather, John C. Smith, instituted this action to recover damages which he sustaimed because of injuries received when he was struck by a car, owned and operated by the defendant, which occurred in front of Overcash's Store and Service Station, sbout one mile North of fooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina, on Highway #21, on January 4, 198; and it &ppearing that the plaintiff and defendant have agreed upon e settlement of al) matters and things growing out of the alleged injuries, set forth in the Plaintiff's Complai nt, whereby the defendant has agreed to pay the plaintiff the “of Eight Hundred Forty Dollars and Seventy-five Cents ($440.75) in full Settlement of the minor's alle ged ingmries, together with the costs of this action. And the Court carefully examired the evidence in the case, particularly ™ evidence of the physician, under whose care the minor was treated, and it ¥ "8 made to &ppear to the Court that the parents of the child are entirely 88 "Wefted with the settlement, and the duly licensed physician, who treated hi ™ 1 of the Opinion that the minor has made e@ full recovery from the injuries and that in his opinion, there will be no lasting, permanent en p- z fe ve IN THE SUPERIOR COURT _ SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 198 Monday, May 2lith, 1948 effects of the injuries which the minor sustained in the alleged Accident After full inguiry into the matter, the Court enters the followiy decree: 1. That the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Eight Hundred Forty Dollars and Seventy-five Cents ($80.75), to be paia by the defendant into the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel} County, 2. That out of the funds paid to him, the Clerk will PAY the Lowrany Hospital, Ince, of Mooresville, North Carolina, the sum of Four Hurd red Fiftesy Dollers and Seventy-five Cents ($415.75), incurred for the treatment of the minor's injuries, which amount 1s found by the Court to be a reasonable Charge for the services rendered; shall pay to the father of the minor, John ¢, Smith, the sum of Seventy-five Dollars ($75.00), for expenses he incurred, during the illness of the minor, which sum is found by the Court to be a reasonable cherge for the expenses incurred; shall pay Noel R. S. Woodhouse, attorney for the plaintiff, the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00), for legal services on the bdehels of the plaintiff, which is found by the Court to be a reasonable charge for th services rendered, de That the defendent shall pay the costs of this action. 4. That the settlement between the purties, entered by consent, sn approved b the Court, is not unreasonable or unjust to the minor plaintiff, bu is to his best interest, Signed and entered at Statesville, North Carolina, this the 2k; day of May, 1948. Charles L Coggin Judge presiding BY CONSENT: John Ce Smith John C,. smith, Next lrilend of Eerl Jr, Smith Noel HR, 8, Woodhouse orney for ain Adams, Dearman & Winberry Attorneys for Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR cour SECOND WEFK -~- MAY TERM 19,8 Monday, May 2th, 191.8 -“ NOe 4,83 WORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 1948. D.» Fe Thompson and wife, Sarah Thompson VS. Mary Woods. First: Did R. E. Woods and his daughter, Verna Woods, execute a deed to D. F. Thompson and wife, Sarah Thompson, purporting to convey lands as described in the deed recorded in Book 132, page lil, in the office of tie Register of Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina? Answer: Y@e@8-e Second: Was the deed defective in that the description therein was deficient? Answer: Yes. Third: Are Verna Woods and R. E. Woods dead as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yese Fourth: Is Mary Woods en heir at law of R. E. Vioods and Verna Woods, deceased? Answer: Yes. Fifth: Does the description set out in the fourth paragraph of the complei nt correctly describe the lmds purpoting to be conveyed in the deed recor-ed in Book 132, page lil, in the office of the Register of Deeds cf Iredell County, North Carolina? Answer: Yese IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WERK -- MAY TERM, 198 Mondey, May 2th, 1948 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY. May Term, 1948, D. F. Thompson end wife, Sarah Thompson Vse JUDGMENT. Mary .oods. This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 195, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before his honor, Judge Charles L. Coggin, and a jury, and being heard ma the jury having answered the issues as folloy: First: Did ke Ee Woods and his daughter, Verna Woods, execute a de to Ne F. Thompson and wife, Sarah Thompson, purporting to convey lands as des. cribed in the deed recorded in Book 132, page 11, in the office of tle Registe of Deeds of Iredell County, North Carolina? Answer: Yes. Second: Was the deed defective in that the description therein wm deficient? Answer: Yes. Third: Are Verna Woods end R. E. ‘oods dead ss alleged in the con answer: Yes. Fourth: Is Mary Woods an heir at law of Re E. Woods and Verne Moots, 4 deceased? Answer: Yes. Fifth: Does the description set out in the fourth paragraph of tht somplaint correctly describe the lands purporting to be conveyed in the deet recorded in Book 132, page jl, in the office of the Register of Deeds of Irett. County, North Carolina? Answer: Yes. It is, a 3 t ne entitled to the undivided interest of the said Mary Woods in the realest describe: ‘ °c in the complaint amd G. C. Lineberger be, and he is hereby sppointe a Commissione Stoner, to convey the undivided interest of the said Mary woods in a and nd to the lands described in the complaint to D, - F. Thompson and wife, Thompson. It isf o further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs pay th cost of this action, Charles Le. Coggin Judge Presiding Cote tbsb shes sence ons Be EH Sede te spse seus se4 * wee TE TE ae ae ae Tee ETE eee Shab se bst Se sedede se te tet therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs be, end ts! IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 198 Mondey, May 2hth, 1948 NO+ 3589 North Carolina In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term, 1948. urs. Gertruce Wagner Vse JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT urs. Myetle Fox Whereas the above case was called out in open Court on Monday, May 2hth, 19d, and the plaintiff failed to appear and prosecute her action; It 1s, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the case be non-suited am the costs of the action are hereby taxed against the plaintiff. Charles L Corin Judge Presiding. No. 1067, 1068 & 10694 ROBRPERY- State Q Each defendant through his counsel tenders a plea of vs ( guilty of Assault With Deadly Weapon, which plee the James Grover Sigmon,aj ‘State accepts. Jack Franklin- 3¢ t These three cases are consolidated for the purpose of Joe Brittian ~ 25 judgment. W. Judgment of the Court is that each defencant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and rulilic Works Commission. By and with the consent of the cefendants and each of them in open Court, this sentence is suspenced for a period of TWO YEARS upon the following terms anc comitions: 1. That the three defendants pay the cost of this action at this term of the court. 2. That the defendants jointly pay into the Clerk's Office for the use and benefit of the person or persons Gamazged, to be submitted by the prosecution to the Clerk and to be disbursed by the Clerk in accordarre with the statement filed by the prosecution, the sum of $504.00. 3. That they not violate any of the lais of the State of North Carolina during said period of suspension, and be of good behavior. Capias and committment to put the foregoing sentence into effect without further orcer of this coubt unless said judgment is complied with et this term of the court. 2" ae “eee? ASSAUL? WITH DEADLY WEAPON ve The Defendant through his counsel tenders a plea of “Mtton ¥ nolo contendere to assult with a deadly weapon, which pler Mahaffey the State accepts. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of HiG"T- TEEN MONTHS assigned to work under the supervision of the State Highway and ‘ublic Works Commission. By and with the consent of the defendant in open Court, this judgment is suspended for a period of TWO YEARS upon the following terms and conditions: 1. That the defendmt pay to the David Hospital the sum of $336.00 covering the treatment of Royal Gregory. Ce thet he pay the cost of this actionat this term of Court. ‘ 3. That he be and remain of good behavior during said period of TWO YEARS, not violate any of the laws of the State of North Caroline. The cost and medical bill is tobe paid at this term of Court, and capias and commitment may issue without further order of the Court by the Clerk upon the failure of the defendant to comply with the above payments. ; ee ee ee ee Coes dana deen - 2 nee ee eee ZS ~~ 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 191.8 Tuesday, May 25th, 198 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on Tue sday Morning » May 25th, 19438. Worl elas NO+ 4511 North Carolina tn the suseetar Cente: Iredell County May Term, Loyd. Forest Lis Carson, Jey by his Next Friend, Sara Louise Carson, Plaintiff, Vae JUDGMENT Paul Le Gilbert, Defendant. an This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1918, of Iredell Superior Court, and being heard before the undersigned presiding Judge, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action brought by the plaintiff, a minor three years old, by his Next Friend, for medical 6xpensés and injuries sustained ag @ result of an automobile accident in the City of Statesville, on or about the 15th day of September, 1947, on South Meeting Street in the 60v block of the city of Statesville, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant was driving his car South on said street, when suddenly and without warning, the plaintiff, @ three year old child, ran out between two automobiles parked parallel to the curd on the right hand side of South Meeting Street directly into the path of the car being driven by the defendant at a lawful rate of speed and that the lefendant was unable to see the said child in time to stop his car in the exercise of due care and avoid striking him. The child, itself, was present in Court with its mother, and Next Friend, Mrs. Sara Louise Carson, and Doctor Paul Deaton of the medical staff of the HF Long Hospital, Statesville, N. C. where the said child was treated after the injury, and it appearl 1g to the Court from the full investigation of ll the facts and the testimony of the mother and doctor, that the child has This Honor able Court takes a recéss until Tuesda a y Morning May made a good re ; covery and is no permanent injury, other than 25th 19), at 9:30 O'clock, se cent ee on ( Op i - (L are which are largely concealed by clothing and which the child will pro- AOS oA 4/—— Judge Presidi ng XS ably outgrow in future years, and it appearing to the Court that the Police Department investigated the incident and made a written report that it was an WAVOLdable accident and that the defendant was without culpable fault; It further appear ing to the Court from the statement of the plaintiff and her attorney, Mr. Zeb V. Long, Jre, that the plaintiff and the defendant have reached a sati sfactory settlement of all matters and things growing out ft he sata Secident, by the terms of which said settlement the defendant is = a oe Sa em os =o IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1948 Tuesday, May 25th, 19,8 to pay to H. F. Long Hospital, nurses and hospital and ambulance bills to the aggregate totel of $669.55 and in addition, 1s to pay to the chia $200.09 an to its mother, Mrs. Surah Louise Carson, to reimburse her for caring for th, child and employing additional help to look after him and unusual Additions) expenses incurred in nursing him, the sum of $300.00, or a total of $1169.55, The Court, efter a full investigation of all the facts and an Oxantns, tion of the witnesses, being of the opinion that said settlement is fair, just and reasonable and would be for the best interests of said minor; it is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the plaintis have and recover judgment against the defendant in the amount of $1169.55 and costs of this action and that out of said $1169.55 $669.55 be paid into the offty of the Court for the payment of the hospital bill to the H. F, Long Hospitel, Inc., Statesville, N. C. am@ $535.55 and that his nurses bill to Mrs. Guy Ward, R.N. $126.00 and ambulance bibl Nicholson Funeral Home $8.00 be paid out of the proceeds of said recovery. It is further ordered and adjudged that the sum of $200.V0 be paid into the Court for the use and benefit of said minor, 4 provided by law, subject tothe appointment of a legal guardian and that the balance of $300.00 be paid to Mrs. Sara Louise Carson, mother of the plaintiff, in full reimbursement for all added medical and other expenses incurred by th parents for the care of said child and that when said sum of $1169.55, covernis the above items, shall have been paid into the office of the Court, the sam same shall de and constitute a complete and final settlement of all claims ani Cemands, past, present and prospective, on behalf of said minor himself, or tis parents, growing out of said automobi le accident, now and in the future. It further appearing to the court that Zeod V. Long, Jr. has acted ss counsel for the plaintiff in this case and has secured a sum to be paid to th parents in the amount of ¥75+I0, and is entitled to reasonable compensation ! his services; It is ordered and adj udged that the said zeb Vv. Long, Jr. bq andl is allowed an atborney's fee of $75 JO out of the proceeéds of recovery to t® pérent, Mrs. Sarr” Louise Carson, the Clerk of this Court, ie OTE eb sesh shah cece te stan Charles L. Coggin ucge rres ng« a Oe te ae te se see espn e tbe se apapes sbuesettsttt ‘ PILES TEE te se Sede bab Se bse ashe Tee Te EET ANT IN THE SUPERIOR OO URT SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1918 Tuesday, May 25th, 19)8 No. 4377 yORTE CAROLINA, In the. Superior Court May Term, 193 IREDELL COUNTY. grace Wood aes Plaintiff, Va. JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT Rimmer's Incorporated, Roscoe West om Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the Honorable Charles L. Coggin, Judge Presiding, at the May Tern, 1948, of the lIrédell Coun ty Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court from the statement of the Attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendants that the matters and things in controversy have been fully settled between the parties, and that the plaintiff desires to take a nonsuit in this action: IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED A™D DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff be nonsuited, and this action dismissed. e. That the cost of this action be taxed against the defendants by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. This the 25th day of May, 1938. Charles L. Cogrin Judge Presiding Consented to: Je G. Lewis Attorney for the Paalnt it? Adams, Yearman & Winberry Scott & Collier RVOMNGYS TOF Wis Dersncanes. oad) 4 { BIcayy Nol Prossed _ VS ‘lien L, Zller No. 4343 lorth Carolina : the Superior Court 4redel] County. my Seen. May Term, 1948 Obate of Will I In Re: Pr of i. G, Sloan i Jury Selected, sworn and em anelled as follows: Bill C. Smith, W. C. Lunsford, a White, o. &. ane. QO. Le Donldson, R. A. Edwards, H. Brown, v . . E, Hilderbran, Le. Me. Nesbit, W. H. Johnson and B. F. Deal, R. A. Gaither. ?30 O'clock. OR rh ae A ~~TJudge Presiding J () | Thi Honorable C t takes a recess until Wednesday Morning Way 26th, 1948 at 9 Loe Py 7 ie meee aE Tt tN a Ee OS Pe SOO > eee —- Soe IN THE SUPERIOR OOURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -~ MAY TERM, 198 SECOND WEEK -- MAY TERM, 1548 wednesday, May 26th, 198 Wednesday, May 26th, 194 Th 3 Yonorable Court eonvenes acecorcinge to ad journmen Morning, May 26th, 195-6 Now 433 In Re: it on Wedne siey A John Mathis vs. Christine 4. Mathis, ---- Continued Lena Leazer vs. Joe leazer, Cont inued Probate of Will of TSs vB. Maxine C. ward vs. Laban Ae Ward, ----- Continued Me Ge Sloan Ed Le Deal vs. Vertie Setzer Deal, ----- Continued Is the paper-writing propounded, and every part thereof, the last Evelyn Le Mitchell, vs. William F, Mitchell, ---- Continued Will, and Testament of M. Ge Sloan? William Le Young vs. We Le Allison, Continued Answer: NO. Edith E. Bass,BNF vs. Fred A. McGraw et al, Continued Nellie Bass Grant, BNF vs. Fred A. McGraw et al,-- Continued 26 Je Allen rope vse Curolina Freight Carriers Corp. -- Continued No. 4783 4! Je Le Stout vse F. Es Cass, Extr of A. J. Crater, -- Continued by consent North Csurolina tn the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term, 1938 Be .e Salmons vs. Yarks Wooten, --------- Continued by consent “ivil Action #3783 Minerva We. Allison vs. Marie Waddell, ---- Continued 3ilbert Englreeing Company, ) In Re: Caveat to Will of A. J. Crater, -- Continued a Corporation, Plaintiff, Vs } De. Le ‘encrix, Ralph Lippard and Cleo Wilson, Defendants. j This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 193, of Iredell Superlor Court before His Honor, Charles L. Coggin, Judge presiding, and bein heard and it appearing to the Court that this 1s an action brought by the plaintirr against the defendants for recovery of damages growing out of an automobile collision on or about “arch 9th, 193, on State Highway #70 at its pel his cause ee ee interesection with the road leading from Barber's Junction, in the upper edg ee ee a eee of Rowan County aid that the defendants filed a cross-action to the plaintiff's probate in solemn form of @ paper-writin, complaint, in which they souzht to recover for damages to the defendmt, Lipar: testament Me cloan, deceased, and aubmobile and personal injury to Cleo "ilson; heir we Onc next Of kin of Ee i the issues submitted to it ae and it further appearing to the Court from the statement of counsel . ; or the parties, that it has been agreed between the plaintiff and defendants s the paper-writin prpouncer, and that a. oe will withdraw their cross-action and counter-claim and ts ¥ and testament of ’ hon=suit with respect thereto and that the - : eupon, will take & non-suit against all the defendants ana ies coe hepap ste from the other) TX oven Te STS . 7) . ze Sloan? " Oe nee ree [ f i = oa a oot nas A Yc tt is, therefore, by consent, ordered, adjudged and decreed; ; : nerefore, acered, considered, ju i Jing purporting to be the last will an \ Ps . : . 7 - 5+ ~p ae ,"are That the Cross-action and counter~wlaim of the defendants, D: 2 ly | ased, is not the last will ana testament ase ly ay Cc defendants! ererne renee be, and the same is hereby withdrawn and t hat tle (ross-a 3 Of nea-suit, ctton @nd counter-claim ig dismissed as upon a judgment Belt ye FEN at and decreed that the 9 of this 8 ct tO 2) and all of t non-suit, fseinst the estate of Me. Ge Sloan, ceceased, said ec ney , sf 4 , ' Yearman & nt rv, fttorneys a. = a plaintirr:. cause of action against the defendants, eVEney"s dams, Yearman & “inber Yo At r 6} 6, ar ‘rOpunder, and an & la . 2) QO for John R. MeLaughnlir , » anc the same is hereby dismissed as upon a judgment of athens and an Attorney's fee of $350. pe gen 2. neta 2 svvOrney for the Caveators to be appli nota © i h a UI 678s f ees < Nyt af #3 ‘ + fo ow ~ : Aarnaaaa — 1b Wa 2 116 ISULETO O] “ae te e loan, COCOaASEC Ue ed on the (3). BY consent, 1 , “ *y 1t Ls orderea th ay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Check of tle fea alia Charles L. Coggin BY consent of; udge rres ng Scott & Collier Attornéys for the PlatntirTr—— Land 5 Owers and Aver orneys for e endants No. bhho-aA IN THE COURT OF RECORD OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA. IN CHANCERY. Clarence Harold Milso, Plaintiff VS. FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE Frances H. Milso, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard for a final decree upon the Bi) of complaint am answer of thedefendant, and it appearing to the court that the defendant has waived notice of final hearing and the entry of a final decree and waiving her right to be present at euch hearing in person or by counsel, and it appearing that the court has jurisdiction of the parties her: to and the subject matter hereof, and the court being advised of its optintor in this matter, it is URDEREL, ADJUDGED AND DECXEED that the bonds of matrimony which has heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Cla:ence Harolc Milso » and the defendant, Frances H, Milso, be, and the same e re hereby dissolved, and the parties be and they are hereby discharged of the obligations and duties ar'sin therefrom except as hereinafter provided; That the sole care, custody, control ana supervision of the minor chile of the parties, to-wit, Clarence Harolc Milso, Jr., be and the same is hereby awarded to the defendant free of any interference of or from the plaintiff but subject always to the right of reasonable visit by said pleintii! at reasonable times and places, ™, a ® ’ 4net the plaintiff be and he is Sy naval allotment the sum of “Orty-two Dollars ($2 of 3 547 ; nf of said child, said amount to be pata so long as the plaintiff is a member e ‘ba 3 + + as > tT ° 5 fror armec forces of the United “gates, That upon his release or éischarge !T the arm j j q 7 r - ss mmec services the plaintirr is req uDDC f e« . Support of said child the sum ulred to pay to the defendant for the é of $50.00 per month, That . 7 . rer hat the court reserves Jurisciction to enter other and further or 45 are neéceas va shale} sary and pr¢ per with regard to the custody and support of said ehtid and nothing in th z this @aid order shall prevent eny court or completent Jurisdiction from enter “ng &ny other or further orders in this regard. “17 ORDERET T wm DONE as ) in Chambers at Pensacola, Escambia County, Florid, this 2nd day 3 A. D., 1947, Of December ; krnest E. Mason JUDGE hereby required to pay to the defent -0O0) per month for the suf co,TE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ESCAMBIA I, George Trawick, Clerk of the Court of Record, Escambie County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Final Decre of Divorce in the case of CLARENCE HaRorpD MILSO vs. FRANCES q, MILSO as the same appears recorded in Chancery Order Book 30 at page 275 of said Court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the i official seal of said Court this 22nd day of March, AeDo, 198, /s/ George Trawick ceorge Trawlck, Clerk Court of Record, Escambia County, Florida Filed in Office G. Se Ce May 22, 198 C. G, Smith, Gs Be ve Woe 4506 NORTE CaROLINa IREDELL COUNTY. Llizabeth N. Utterbourg Plaintiff, Vse “@rion archer Utterbourg Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, before the fon. Carl Gg, smith, Clerk of the above court, it appearing to said court ‘rom the statment af the attorney for the plaintiff James R. Burgess, that h, ne yr Cesires to submit to a voluntary nonsult: {t 1s, therefore, orcered, edjudged, snd decreed that the plaintiff 06 nNonsulted ana be taxed with the cost in said action. This 20 day of May, 19,3. Ce. G. Smith i Clerk of the Superfor cour Con y, 148 sented to this 19th day of May, 1%3. Jas, R > + Burgess borne y Tor the PleintiftrT OCTET EEE TE TE He BE ab HEHE SE FETE SE Sh SESE I TERME TEE SEE SESE SEE HEE NESE IE A ear “a woRM GAM dd MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Mariemma Henley, Register “ LREDE LL COUNTY County, State of North Carolina, have appointed and do by w, Le Lowe, trading 938 Auto {| appoint Miss Nellie W. Patterson, of I[redell County end State Salvage eines Tre North Carolina, my true and lawful Deputy Register of Deeds, and empower Vs. her to do an nd all acts pe iing to the office of the Register , Henry We Crowson of Iredell empower her end causes cominz on to be heard Cc y T have here mro 1a : , t ve hereunto set my hand ar seel, this the }: . | ourt of lredell defendant Pann tyr on \ Ll, And , Appearing to t} register of heeds Lg th 7 tredell County, N. C o : pmor ssued 11 ’ action appear! <a ano a swear tha L will support the relhs WwW. Jo LT dow 5 sm marcn ‘ntar ‘ + ’ sir -erelyvy swenr that snverest; tha u ‘tate of North mn sald n wal hoari+? ‘ sh Ca whian a, . ’ h ‘ Wlich e or may be establis? ad for the wi nden . i ll endeavor to a) pport, maintain and deferc State rie . 4 » not Inconsistent with the Constitution of the nearin icwledrv na : ¢ . A at > ey seave and abllity; Sc help me Gode . * Si] Yel £ 0 Us. * 4f0m the defendant the m 7 together with inter 6 - t at s per cent annum m the d f this ‘nerefore, it is ordered, ad ju naye and an recover . » Vex of the defendant the sum of June, 1943, and the costs of thi: a 7 ii of June, 1943. , patti eo S80itemnily swear that j will honestly and } Ce Se Smith t Tenuty R es \ a . . J North Clerk of the Superlor Court ag + eo *« gister of Deeds of Iredell County, Kw t gars? 1lity, azreeable to law, and to & Register of Deeds to the best of" v a a ea Su aeEtenennntentaeemeee tensa ees aoa set Y 4 4 Onorea! oOvergyv ty the } efore u heard Penalties — ss pS Ss — ac ’ t yom" J i jd ped pnd J} 4 pli tes Lie kU f ’ ‘ ants Aid time allowed by lay iss Dorothy Bost, might answer the comp] defendant. Cow "9 YOUNEY of Inedey, el) iiged and ae anat ised 4nd that sush answer gts ryt @ % V -éinaftep deg. followin, aay preserve lien is locate L's Transquility property, follows: Beginning 4t ® ville, North Caroling, min. West 1,6 feet to 8 ) feet toa st an eastward 7 . Narn } defendant, Miss Dorothy barrec and forever forclosed her r} t ; Y) ne i , e except 48 to her right to participate in the istribution of ar yY surrlus that m ult from the sale herein authorized, It ts further ordered arf 8d judged thet Barron ne is nereby appointec Commissioner to sell said repel estate auction for cash to the highest biccer, at the Courthouse a ting notice of said sale at the days prece successive weeks Commissioner Si ee ee ae = ae f rir - Zz O x ve NOe 4498 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cour? IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal Corporation. Plaintiff Va. Myrtle Bailey, widow of Alfred Beal ley; Hattie Mae McNair and husband, Charles McNair; Annie Adams and husband, Rovere Adams; Statesville Buck Company; A. T. Ellis and wife, Ellis; and the Couty of Iredell. Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the uncer. signed Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action for the foreclosure of the lien for taxes due the plaintirr upon real estate described in the Complaint, and it further appearing to the Couwt that plaintiff, at the time of the institution of this action, filed a duly verified Complaint setting out the amount of its lien against said real estate, and now files a proper certificate showing the amount of taxes which have subsequently accrued against said real estate, as authorized by Section 1719 (g) of Chapter 310, Sublic Lews of 1939 as amended; and it further appearing that all of the defendants named in this action have been properly served with summons in the maner and within the time required by law and are properly befor and subject to the jurisdiction of the Court; snd it further appearing that the defendants, Myrtle Bailey, widow of Alfred Bailey; Hattie Mae McNair end husband, Charles McNair; Annie Adams amd husband, Revere Adams, Statesville Buick Company; A. T, Ellis and wife, Ellis, filed no answer, cemurrer, or other pleading within the time allowed by law and that the time within which the said defendants, Myrtle Bailey, widow of Alfred Bailey; Hattie “a0 N McNair, and husband Charles McNeir; Annie Adams and husband, Rovere Adams} Stat Stesville Buick Company; a, T. Ellis and wife Ellis, might enswer the , Compleint of the plaintirr has expired; and it further appearing that th defendant, County of Iredell, had filed no answer in which no issue was raise and thet . wy Sueh answer did not seek to prevent the foreclosure sale of the prope! here inaft r °F described, but prayed the Court for judgment against the propert] described ed in the complaint delcaring the lien of Iredell County, for texes due it on said Property to be preserved and to be of equal dignity with the lie for taxes due the Plaintirr; It is therefore, upon mot ion of Barron kK. G ey for the Plaintiff, ordered K. Grier, attorney » 8djudged J » @nd declreed that the plaintiff, City of states! nas a first and prior lien, except that Iredell County has a lien of equal dignity, upon that parcel or tract of real estate hereinafter described for taxes, together with interest, penalties and costs, for the following years ani in the following amounts: YEAR PRINCIPAL Interest, Penalties, and Costs. $ pone a 1ST ON ON ON ON ON ON ON] -I JAI) =e €& | ££ £82 8S 2 ee eS 1928 1929 1 1861 1932 193 1988 1936 l 1986 ie 19{,0 1942 12 eeee ~“JeMN fo DN JON AAA oe wor -— OEE ONNO . DRO MD MW fo fo DO CANAAN RPUNDO-—] meme MM PO f fo PO Powwrwwwe J a . ~~ oe * . INH & BR ONONNN OND 0 WON NN U7 UT PO. FREER EEE EEE re Ord NNN O ON) H H- TOTAL TAXES $101.3) together with the costs of this action. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed thet the defendant, County of Iredell, has a lien for taxes due it in the amount set forth in the answer filed by the said County of Iredell in this cause, upon the property hereinafter described, of e qual dignity with that of the plaintiff, City of Statesville, and that said lien of the County of Iredell, is hereby preserved. That the real estate upon which this Judgment is 6 lien is located in Statesville Township, Iredell County, North Carolina, and is more perticular- ly described as follows: lot #12 of the M. A. Tomlin property as shown on a plat thereof recorded in plet book 1 at page 1 of the Iredell County records. All the right, title, and interest of the defendants, Myrtle Bailey, widow of Alfred Bailey; Hattie Mee McNair and husband, Charles McNair; Annie Adams and husband, Rovere Adams; Statesville Buick Company; A. T. Ellis and wife, E —— Ellis, in and to said real estate is hereby barred and forever foreclosed, except as to their right to participate in the distribution of *"Y surplus that my result from the sale herein autopized. It 1s further ordered and adjudged that Barron K. Grier be ari he ” hereby *ppointed Commissioner to sell said real estate at public auction for cash to the highest bidder, at the Courthouse door in Iredell County, ‘ter first Posting notice of said sale at the Courthouse in Iredell County, for thirty (30) days preceding said sale, and also advertise once “Wek for foun successive weeks in some newspaper published in Iredell rounty, and said Commissioner shall sell said reel estate free and cher of a i *neumbrances, and shall deliver a deed conveying said real estate in fee simple to the purchaser, And the said Commissioner wiaj, within these days after said sale, make report thereof to the Court, It is further ordered and adjudged that from the Proceeds of th, sale the Commissioner shall pay to the plaintiff and to the defendant, County of Iredell, the amount of the taxes, penalties, interest and costs Ad Judged to be a lien upon said real estate, and the costs of this action, inc luding compensation to the Commissioner in the amount of 5% of the purchase pricg of said real estate, end shall pay any surplus remaining in his hands into the Court. Ard this cause is retained for further orders. This the 7th day of July, 1948. C. Ge. Smith er Oo 6 ouperlor Our Be De ee eee EET HEE Lee Ee HSE HE TEE Ae Hb TERE Hb Be ae Se AE HE ESE HE Ede ESE des SE Sb ESE EEE NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDH. L COUNTY City of Statesville, a municinal Corporation, Plaintiff JUDGMENT Va. Relie Sells Munday, and the County of Iredell, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the unéer- signed Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that this !s an action for the foreclosure of the lien for texes due the plaintiff upon real estate described in the Complaint, and it further appearing to the Court that Plaintiff, at the time of the institution of this action, filed a duly verified Complaint setting out the amount of its te estate, and now have subsequently a by law and are pro- Court; and it further 1s Munday, filed no answer, demurrer, within the time allowed by law and that the time within endant, Relie s of the Plaintirr hag ©xp lred; , or other Pleading which the said d ells Munday, might answer the complain “nd it further appearing that the defendant, County of Tredell, has filed a mn Q@nswer in which no issue wag raised and thet such answer did not seek to prevent the foreclosure sale of the property pereinafter described, but prayed the Court for Judgment against the property of the defendant, Relie Sells Munday, declaring the lien of Iredell County, for taxes due it by the defendant, Relie Sells Munday, to be preserved and to be of equal dignity with the lien for taxes due the plaintiff. It is therefore, upon motion of Barron k. Grier, attorney for the plaintiff, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, City of Statesville, has a first prior lien, except that Iredell County has a lien of equal dignity, upon that parcel or tract of real estate hereinafter described for taxes, together with interest, penalties and costs, for the following years and in the following amounts: PRINCIPAL Interest, Penalties TOTAL and Costs $18.90 $8.2 $27 lk 15.68 a 23.14 12.60 6.72 19.42 11.20 she 13. 20 6d 13:83 20.48 12.1 15.77 12.15 18.77 12.15 18.77 10. re 16.543 ol 6 >. a . . 7 .* . . . . FOND HY AD OOOW Com fo WON Rune 11.90 7252 717 2.23 a 15.16 Uy. 6h, S 5.88 12.55 11.76 FRNA ANAARO . reo Sof together with costs of this action. it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant, County of Iredell, has a lien for taxes due it in the amount set forth in the newer filed by the said County of Iredell inthis cause, upon the property hereinafter described, of equal dignity with that of the plaintiff, City of Statestille, and that said lien of the County of Iredell, is hereby Preserved, That the real estate upon which this judgment is a lien is locateq in Statesville Township, Iredell, North Carolina and is mae part- loularly described as follows: Beginning on the street running to the Cotton Factory on the sp taeon line, thence t. he E. 176 to a stake, Overcash's corner, thence S. stree 17 feet to a stake Lowell's corner; thence S. 27 W. 170 feet to the i t, thence N. 70 W. 13 feet with the street to the beginning, containing “eres more or less. All the right, title and interest of the defendant, Relie Sells mney, in and to said real estate is hereby barred ami forever foreclosed, 6 *ept as to her right to participate in the distribution of any surplus t ha + may result from the sale herein authori zed. It is further ordered and edjudged that Barron K. Grier be and he is hereby appointed Commissioner to sell said reale state at public Quction for cash to the highest bidder, at the Courthouse door in Iredel) County, after first posting notice of said sale at the Courthouse door in Iredel) County, for thirty (30) days preceding said sale, and also advertising ono, a week for four successive weeks in some newspaper published in Iredell) County, and said Commissioner shall sell said real estate free and char of all encumbrances, and shall deliver a deed conveying said real Ostate in fee simple to the purchaser, And the said Commissioner will, within three days after said sale, make report to the Court. It 1s further ordered and adjudged that from the proceeds of the sale the Commissioner shall pay to the plaintiff and to the defendant, County of Iredell, the amount of the taxes, penalties, interest and costs adjudged to be a lien upon said real estate, and the costs of this action, including compensation to the Commissioner in the amount of 5% of the purchase price of said real estate, and shall pay any surplus remaining in his hands to the defendant, Relies Sells Munday. And this cause is retained for further orders. This the 13 day of July, 1948, Ce G. Smith erk oO e superior Court aE TEE Tete a Se bak Se eset Sb ab sbb se Saede chsh ae Mesh e Le bGb Se sede sete Hee de No. 4512 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal Corporation. Plaintiff Vs. E, He Killian and wife, Beulah Killian, and the County of Iredell.j Defendants. | THIS cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the “uperior Court, and it a nearing to the Court that this is an action for the foreclosure of the lien for local improvements and for taxes due the plaintiff upon reel estate described in the complaint, and it further appearing to the Court, that plaintiff, at the time of the institution of this action, filed a duly verified complaint setting out the amount of its tax lien and lien for local improvements against said real estate, and now files a proper certifi- cate Showing the amount of taxes which are a lien on Said property, as authorized by Section 1719 (g) of Chapter 310, Public Laws of 1939 as amended; and it further appearing that all of the defendants named in this action have been properly served with summons in the manner and within the time required by law, and sre properly before and Subject to the jurisdiction of the Court; and it further appearing that the defendants, Ee H. Killian and wife, Beulah hillian, filed no answer, ceuurrer, or other Bleading within the time alloved by law and that the time within which the Said defend nts, E. H, Killian and wife, Beulsh M.idan, micht answer the Complaint of the plaintiff has ex»ired; and it furt.er a. pearing that the defen ant, County of Jredell, has filed an swer in which no issue was raided and that such answer did not seek to Prevent the foreclosure sale of the property hereinafter described, but Payed the Court for judgment against the property of the defendants, ~e H. Millian and wife, Beulah hillian, declaring the lien of Iredell Younty, for taxes due it by the defendants, =. H. Killian and wife, “eulah Killien, to be preserved and to be of equal dignity with the lien for taxes due the plaintiff. It is therefore, upon motion of Barron h. Grier, attorney for the Plaintire, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, City of “atesville, has a first and prior lien, except that Iredell County has a 1 len of qual dignity, upon that parcel or tract of real estate hereinafter described for taxes, and for local improvements together with interest ’ penalties and costs, for the following years and in the following amount 8; PRINCIPAL Interest, renalties and bosts $21.00 $5204 7.00 5.38 6-75 5032 6.75 5 032 5.60 5.04 450 4.78 4.00 4.66 4-83 4286 4.83 4286 4.73 4084 hea 4.83 4.73 4.84 4.02 4266 2.64 4.33 2052 4,230 2s04 4el9 1.92 ied? 1.68 097 1.68 087 3236 013 LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS Principal unpaid. 710.00 Interest to date ' 3292 Je Total aL 3000 together with costs of this action. 7 ‘Yr >, . * ail ‘t is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defext ant, County of Ired a ae — » vounty of Iredell, has a lien for taxes due it in the amount set fort in the answer le vy the saia Cc Trad he ’ Svwer filed by the said Vounty of Iredell in this cause, upon the oror vy _~ ‘ on - P : en oe property hereinafter deacribed, of e usl dignity with that of the plaiati‘: City of Statesvi) 1 vity of Statesvilie, and that said lien of the County of Iredell, is here by preserved, That the real est.te upon which this Judgment is a lien is located ; lle 7 : ‘ ved in Statesville Township, Iredell County, North Carolina, and is nore particularly described as follows: the Cit: of Pv sameart at a stuke on the East side of Highland Avenue in corner of the Carolina, 50 feet South of the South Bast — thence N. 69 i ighland Avenue and Wasson Street and rum aid Stake on the West side of an alley; ane : oh alley S. 20 E. 59 feet to a stake corner of 10 e with the Northern line qa ee, craded School Addition to Statesville; the thence with Highland 6 of Said 10t 8S. 72 We 179 feet to Highland Avenue; all of Lot No. 24 : ae N. 18 Wi. 50 feet to the beginning, and peing ES State srt, Of lot No. 23 of the™John Mi. Sharpe Graded “Chool Additon toy ' tatesville" Vy which is recorded in ok ie page $99 of the Res te » North Carolina, -~ NO+ 29, page 599 of the Records of All the Tight, title and interest Ee He ELT >St of the defendants, “« tillian and wife, : Beu] ‘ utah “illian, in and to said real estate is hereby parred and forever forclosed, except as to their right to participate in the dist ibution of any surplus that may result from the sale herein authorized. It is furt:er ord-red and adjudged that Barron hl. Grier be and he is hereb. appointed Commissioner to sell said real estute at public auction for cash to the highest bidder, at the Courthouse door in Iredell County, after first posting notice of said sale at the Courthouse door in Iredell County, for thirty (30) days preceding said sale, and also advertise once a week for four succesSive weeks in some newspaper published in Iredell County, and said Commissioner shall sell said real estate free and clear of all encumbrances, and shall deliver a deed conveying said real estate in fee simple to the purchaser. and the said Comuissioner will, within three days after said sale, make report to the Court. It is further ordered and adjudged that from the »vroceeds of the sale the Commissioner shall pay to the plaintiff and to the defendant, County of Iredell, the amount of the taxes, venalties, interest and costs adjudged to be a lien upon said real eStabg, and shall pay to the plaintiff the amount of principal and interest due it for its lien for local improve- ments, and the costs of this action, including com ensation to the Commissioner in the amount of 5;5 of tne purchase price of said real estas nd shall pay any surplus remaining in his hands to the defendants, i. %, Lillian and wife, Beulah Killian. and this cause is retained for further orders. This 13 day of July, 1948. ’ aq rTrnity Ve Te dad + Le Clerk of the superior Court 26 OK OR OK 2 oR 2K 2K gO 2 2K a aaa aC IG a a aK 2p a 2 aK a aie ak 2 2 2a a 2 I 2 ARG aE a aR aK ar On ae a aE ( — a ae aoe a OT A a ES = No. 4526 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR cour? COUNTY OF IREDELL. BEFORE THE CLERK, R. C. West, Plaintiff, Vs. VOLUNTARY NONSUIT. Re G wold, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard, and now being heard, before Hon. C. %, Smith, Clerk of the sbowe court, and it appearing to the court from the statement of James R. Surgess, attorney for the plaintiff that the defendant had made satisfactory arrangements with the plaintiff in this matter, and that the plaintiff has elected to take a voluntary non-suit in this matter; it is therefore, Ordered and Decreed that the plaintiff be nonsuited, and the cost t be charged against him by the said clerk. This 14 day of July, 1945. C. Ge. Smith Clerk of Superior Court. Consented to: J. Re Yurrcess. attorney for the plaintit?. AE ARO OR OK 2 KOK OK ak oe ok ok AY RO RO RK OK ok ok doh ok ofeok a oi ak opr ok oe op ok ok ok tok pK ak NOo 4516 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a municipal ation e Corpor Plaintiff Vs. J. Me Echerd and wife, Esther E. Echerd ard the County of Iredell. Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action for the foreclcsure of the lien for taxes due the plaintiff upon real estate described in the Complaint, and it further appearing to the Court that plaintiff, at the time of the institution of this action, filed a duly verified Complaint setting out the amount of its tax lien against said real estate, and now files a proper certificate show ing the amount of taxes which are a lien ageinst said real estate, as suthorized by Section 1719 (g) of Chapter 310, Public Laws of 1939 @s amended; and it further &ppe@ring that all the defendants named in this aertisRizakea named in this action have been properly served with summons in the manner and within the time required by law and are properly before and subject to the jurisdiction of the Court; and it further appearing that the defendants, J. M. Echerd, and wife, Esther E. Echerd, filed no answer, demurrer, or other pleading within the time allowed by law and that the time within which the said defendants, J. M. Echerd and wife, Esther E. Echerd, might answer the com- plaint of the plaintirr has expired; and it further appearing that the d efendant, County of Iredell, has filed an answer in which no issue was raised and that such answer did not seek to prevent the foreclosure sale of the property hereinafter described, but prayed the Court for judgment agains gainst the property of the defendants, J. M. Echerd and wife, Esther E. Ech erd, declaring the lien of Iredell County, for taxes due it by the defe . ndant, J. M. Echerd and wife, Esther E. Echerd, to be preserved and to b ® of equal dignity with the lien for taxes due the plaintiff. It is therefore, upon motion of Barron K. Grier, attorney for the plain tiff, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, City of States- Ville » bas @ first and prior lien, except that Iredell County has @ lien of *qual dignity, upon that parcel or tract of reale state hereinafter described for ta 788, together with interest, penalties and costs, for the following year 8 @nd in the following amounts: YEAR PRINCIPAL Interest, penalties and Costs 192 l 8, 2 8.73 80 092 PRINCIPAL Interest, Penalties TOTAL YEAR And Costs. 1929 278, 1B: 1936 P 3338 oe ee, TOTAL $72.02 together with costs of this action. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defer ant, County of Iredell, has 4 lien for taxes due it in the amount set forth ip the answer filed by the said County of Iredell in this cause, upon the property hereinafter described, ofe qual dignity with that of the plaintiffs, City of Statesville, and that said lien of the County of Iredell, is hereby preserve, That the real estate upon which this judgment is a lien is located in Statesville Township, Iredell County, North Carolina and is more particuly!; described as follows: Lots 5 and 6 in Block 9 of the "Park Place" as shown on a plat ther: of contained in Plat Book 2 et page 9 of the Iredell County Registry. All the right, title and interest of the defendants, J. M. Echerd and wife, Esther E. Echerd, in and to saic realestate is hereby barred and forever foreclicsed, except as to their right to participate in the distributl: of any surplus thet may result from the sale herein authorized. It is further ordered and adjudged that Barron K. Grier be and he is lreby appointed Commissioner to sell said real estate at public auction for cash to the highest bidder, at the Courthouse door in Iredell County, after first posting notice 6f said sale at the Courthouse door in Iredell County, for thirty (30) days preceding said sale, and also advertise once @ week for four successive weeks in some newspaper published in Iredell County, and said Commissioner shall sell said real estate free ard c lear of all encumbrances, and shall deliver a deed conveying seid real estate in fee simple to the purchaser. And the said Cormissioner will, within three day after said sale, make repa t to the Court. It is further ordered and adjudged tt from the proceeds of the sale the Commissioner shell pay to the plaintiff and to the defendant, com) of Iredell, the amount of the taxes, penalties, interest and costs ad judge to be a ilen upon said real estate, and the costs of this action, including compensation to the Commissioner inthe amount of 5% of the purchase — of sald aid real estate, and shall pay any surplus remaining in his hands t0 the defendants, J, M. Echerd and wife, Esther E. Echerd. And this cause {s retained for further orders. This the 16 day of July, 1948, Te Sb sete seth tees cece . ORS ete tee tet arse ate dese see sees se cet gg teab ab sear setae sebdt of &nd he the p) Plaintire is hereby n Now 4489 North Carolina Iredell County C. 0» Sigmon and Edgar Thompson VSe JUDGMENT Thoras Ce Johnson and Nan Hall Johnson This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Suverior Court of Iredell County on this July 22, 1943 ana it appearing to the court that summons was served on both defendants and more than thirty days have expired; that the sult 1s for a debt due by note and that the plaintiffs are entitled to judgment by default final. it is therefore ordered that plaintiffs recover of the cefendants the sum of $257.18 the full amount of the note and interest from Dec. 6, 19:7 and that the defendants be waxed with the cost of the action. Ce Ge Smith Clerk Superfor Court “et “BJWOod H. Reid vefendant o his : cr vweS C@use coming on to be heard and beinz heard before er] Ge < t ’ om t 4 4th, Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County, North and it a earire 4 ; N Ppe@ring to the Court that this is an action for claim anc delt: ‘ 488ued ’ +n conn 1 ection with a title-reteinirg “note in which the plaintiff &skeg a for POSS8@€ssion of a 2911-129) And Harley-Davidson Motorcycle, Motor No. 39U-1291. it furth er apne rin t ¢ th th on revecle aay + Ss iz a ppes ig ° he Court nat 6 mopor CVC wes nov 6 6 a h . a Qa ¢t a “Nat the defendant . paid the amount due and owing to the plaintiff and “Met the Sherire made his return eg follows: "sett lement made with the plaintiff". it ss At is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed upon the motion nd, Sow e rs & Avery, Attorneys for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff be ls herepy eby allowed to take a non-suit in the sbove entitled action, and On-suited. This the 24rd day of July, 1948. C. Ge Smith, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County ROE Shee teak ok hte ee Het PETE TE TE He tt hte sett te it << ee yee are = ae ee cage Seg eee ‘ > — ~ eae bound > | ; rr = Zz O co Le IN THE SUPERIOR COUR? FIRST WEEK~- AUGUST TERY, 198 Monday, *ugust end, 19s NORTH CAROLINA, IN TH: SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. AUGUST TERM, 194% Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and hel@ in ano for the County and State aforesaid at the Courthouse in Statesville, N.C. on sve Ve the end day of August, 1948, at 10:00 O'clock A. Me,when and where His Honor, J, Ae Rousseau, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for this the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, Fall Term 19h, is present anc presiding, end Honorable John ke McLaughlin, Solicitor and prosecuting Attorney in and for the Fifteenth Jucicial ~istrict of North Carolina, is present and prosecut- ing in the name of the State. Ne De Morrison, High Sheriff of sredell County is present and opened Court by order of the Court. Ve Morrison, High Sheriff of Iredell County returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for wvae + we tuls the august Term, 1946 Iredell County Superior sOurt, to-wit: Le G. McLain Miss Helen Herman 3lenn Holland wery ie Jolly r. H. dicks Ve. Leetherwood Johnson Thomas L. Hill ue yes Cansler he Le Frazier Ney C herri] .« Boggs Dillon Leonsrd Temple 3 Me Frank Bryant Comb s H Mi He Me Hoo Charles Austin Johnson Ervin Hedrick The following good and lawrul men were 217 drawn and sworn to ome Jury for the Six Wonths period ending December 31, 19),4: ~e Me Be. .ewis reorge kK. Hendren — slenn Holland Nerles nustin de Ye Mott : , ; lo “* Be Hedrick di, Hicks Be De Mayes “* SOuthergs Thomes Le Hill H, M. Hooper Pe ile Dillon was sworn as Foreman of Granda Jury. “e “e Woodward was sworn as officer in charge of Grand Jury. “Ps ery & Jolly, J. tli Privette, were excused by the Court a MLSS Helen Herman, was not returned r °srt Clendenin, was excused by Statute ve Ce McNeely, was deceased “+ Gadon, was excused on Doctor's certificate IN THe SUPEKLOKR COURT FIks'! WEEK-- AUGUST TERM, 1948 Monday, August end, 194% N r NON#SUPPORT ids Allas Caplas vs Robert Watts Noe 725 BASTARDY state Continued under former order vs T. be Nixon Noe 7hu NON-SUPPORT state Continued under former order vs Manusl shoemaker NOe 324 SREAKING, sNTERING AND LARCENY state Alias Capias vs Lee Wooas , Noe 391 EMBEZ state Continued under former order Vs iie OhMEW Brown PTT <rrowren sce LD Oe J12 ACOA i vé State alles ( vs ienderson ?. Redmon * ‘ At WwOe 7a State Vs ‘a vilftord Ve Hall, JY ‘Oe JU state vs John iH. summers Oe Yul state Tan + ANU, Y eo Defendant appeared and showed good behavior. +4 . Cor tinued a n i 4 . r Davia Overessh Aon Unde! sormer order am . BAS CARD y ‘ont {nued under former order on we. 4 Jnie Le Nicholson No. 954 DONM ‘ wm Aun annus Seats aa ONE ANU NON@=SUPpPOR'Y! - ) Ontinued uncer former order hKichard G, d‘illep NOe Y6E otate vs John ¢’, Lambert Noe AJ12 Deak, YP Tey Tern te MRIVING DRY NK Joe x, vurpin Aliag Caplag io. 1036 state = , Clyde Fox oe LOL state vs Vance Peacock NOe6 1055 ptate vs John Leonard Noe 1056 state vs John Léonard Noe 1057 state Vv Ss John Leonard Yo. LOB) state vs nddie Joines 106 lU90 otate vs Tennie rasson liu te “St a 8 10+ 909 state _vs Thomas L. Sumner g 0. lu62 state Vs “bert Teague hecg 0. 953 State Vs John We Ollis IN THE SUPERIOR Count? FIRST WeEK -- AUGUST TERM, loys monday, August 2nd, 1944 ASSAULT WITH DADLY wWapo Continued under former order LAR CEN y¥ Alias Capias DRIVING DRUNK; SPEEDING alias Vapias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY VRAPON Alias Capias CARRY CONCEALED WEAYLON Allas caplas 'IP-ORT continued under former order ASSAULY WITH DrADLi WHRAPON Continued under former order SELLA VENT The defendant being present in Court revuests that he be given additional time in whlch to pay the sum of | 49. as set out in the original judgment. {ft is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay into the office of the Clerk this Court the sum of »1)0.00 now and the remainder to he paid by the November Term,19h0. NON=SUPPOKT The judgment herein is modified by striking out the payment to the son, for the reason that the son is in the Ue Se Navy and is about 1 years of age. It is ordered that the defendant pay the cost of issuing and serving scl Fa. and Captas. SPEEDING The defendant through his Attorney, . R. Rattley entrs & plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled and beturned a verdict of guilty. NON-SUP 20R it is ordered that the defendant pay £25.00 at this time on the back payments of $150.00, and pay 315.0 per week beginning August 1), 194, and a like amount every week thereafter until he has caught up with the back balance, and $10.00 a week from then on until the further orders of the Court. DRUNK AND DISOKDLRLY . The defendant through his Attorney, W. R. Rettley enters a plea of guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jeil of Iredell County for a period oe DAYS assigned to work under the supervision of the Sta Highway and Public Works Commission. Noe 1119 state vs koy Overcash We45 No. 1l2l ota te vs Roy Uvercash NOe ll2vu otate vs Koy Overcash W455 No. 1101 state Vs salter Kk, Johnson Yo. 113 State vs Guy Kamsey NO. 1129 otuate V3 Tom Wacktee C-52 Noe 1140 State vs te Ne Cheek vadie L. Crider W-00=5V No. 1127 state vs Wade Wilgon W-i7 [IN THn SUPsKIOR COURT FIRS? wBEK -- AUGUST Tsk, 1940 monday, -.ueust cnd, 1946 DRUNK AND DISORDERLY the defendant through his Attorney, enters a plea of guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County to be assizned to work on the roads under the SUPEYvi sion or the State Highway and Public Works Commission for , period of THIRTY DAYS. This sentence to take effect at the explration ot the sentence in No, 1118, We Re Battley, ORUNK AND PDISORD:RLY The defendant bhrough his Attorney, W. k, Batt ley enters a plea of guilty. ’ Jucgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County to be assimed to work on the roads under the Supervision of tig state Hizhway and Public works Conmission for a period of TUINTY DAYo. ‘this sentence is to take effect at the expiration of the sentence in No. 1129. RESISwING ARRAS‘ The defendant through his Attorney, enters a plea of guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confine in the common jail of fredell C unty for a period of EIs7 yr, Weaines and assigned to work under the supervision of the otate Hizhway and Publie works Comnission. This sentence is suspended for TWO YEARS on the following conditions: That he not zo into any place of business where wines and beers are kept and sold; that he not drink any substez: containing alchol; that he not violate any of the laws of the <ctate. Me Re Battley LAtITe werner snacce a AookVad Wilh DEADLY WLAP UN Continued for the Defendant PALSE PRET! ISE Continued for the state “SESSING NOW-TAX PAID LIQUOR The defendant enters a plea of ullty. : Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined 7 the common Jail of lredell County for a period of oF th seeps aN assigned to work under the supervision © “ne State Highway and Public Works Commission. PORN ICaTION AND ADULTRy The defendant through thei 3, Kh, Grier enter a plea of not gufitye attorney, 3. 7 Jury sworn an rr ‘ To ara Wl, AGAINST NATURE lee Cefendant through his Attorney, J. R. Burgess enter! The Court is of the oa oe support that charge. The oe + a ble trespass; the Court og terms an = ces the defendmt o robation unde impose na cone tions as the probation officer sees fit * The LLCHTEEN MONTHS ¢ The prison sentence is sree bth a placed on probation upon the se udgment and further conditions set ag Specai] condition ; a by the 8 Of probation ordere all intestate defendant shall: "aaa tn from t he yee f make ever nts. Return to school in September 1948 and, and remai, co to pass work. Stay off the streets Or has a Job ang Ca each night after nine o'clock unlees ag to Stay on the job after that hour d empanelled, returned a verdict of not s-'' wii! uspended for a period of FOUR * Yo. 1117 state vs ; Joe Gritfin No. 1123 state vs Henry We Houser No. 112) state vs Corbet Hepler No. ll2o State vs Walter ‘’. KLlmore No. lla state vs Corbet Hepler No. 1125-1125 state vs Willie J. Black Nog.1)12 “state Vs avery licDowell C-27 NO. 1123 State vs 4enry «. Houser C-42 No. 1le5 State Vs alliie Jamés 3lack IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK - AUGUST TERM, 19h0 Monday, August cna, 19) DRIVING DRUNK Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisti Sel Fa and Capias, Instanter Process. BRYARING AND ENTERING A TRUE BILL BREAKING, ENYERING AND LARGENy A TRUE BILL DRIVING DRUNK Continued for the be fendant BREAKING, ENTEKING AND LARCENY Continued for the state BREAKING, ENTERING aAlD A TRUE BILL MANSLAUGHTER The defendant throuzh his attorney, \. R. Battley enters & pleaéf not guilty. At the close of State's evidence defendmt moves for judgment of Non-Suit. Motion allowed. nm wr BREAKING AND ENTERING The defendant through his attorney, W. i. sattley enters a plea of not guilty. Jury sworn and empanelled, returned a verdict of guilty. BREAKING AND EVYERING AND LARCENY The defendant through his attorney, J. UG. ~ewis enters @ plea of not guilty. vn the count for breaking and entering, JUDG ENT of the Court is that the defendant be confired in the STATE'S PRISON at Raleigh for a period of not less than FOUK nor more than SI¥ YEARS and assizned to work as provided by law, shisxuantanca Un the count for larceny, JUDG ENT of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the STATE'S PRISON at Raleigh for a period of not less than WO nor more than FIVE YEARS and assigned to work &s provided by law, this sentence to commmence immediately on the expiration of the sentence above. Ki CREIVING STOLEN PROPERTY (Value of less than $50.) Remanded to Recorder's Court for trial Noe 1119 state vs hoy Overcash W=-45 Noe 1121 otate vs Koy Uvercash No. 112U Stu te v3 Koy Overcush at&t “ 72 0. llul otate vs ‘alter Kk. Johnson lo. Lily wutate vs suy Kamsey ‘O. 1129 otute V3 fom Wacktee ro e C a 4 Noe 1140 state vs “ae Ne Cheek wadie LL, rider WOG=5Y Noe 1127 otate Vv: Wade Wilson W=i7 [IN THt SUPzRIOR COURT FIRST MEK => AUGUST THERM, 1946 Monday, ..weust cnd, 1946 DRUNK AND DISORDERLY the defendant through his Attorney, enters a plea of guilty. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common Jail of ILredel) County to be assijsned to work on the roads under the Supervi gslon of the State Highway and Public Works Commission for 4 period of THIRTY DAYS. This sentence to take effect at the explration of the sentence in No, 22198, “s He Battiey, RUNK AND LISORDrRLY The defendant bhrough his Attorney, W. Ke Battley enters a plea of guilty. . Judyment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County to be assiimed to work on the roads under the Supervision of thy state Hihway and Public Works Commission for a@ pertod of Minky DAYS. ‘hls sentence is to take effect at the expiration of the sentence in No. 1119. NholsvING ARKLS' The defendant through his Attorney, Vi. R. Batt ley enters a plea of guilty. Judgment of the Court 1s that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Lredell C unty for 4 period of Eq MONTHS and asslzned to work under the supervision of the otate Highway and Publle works Commission. This sentence {3 suspended for TWO YSARS on the following conditions: That he not go into any place of business where wines and beers are kept and sold; that he not drink any substence containing alehols; that he not violate any of the laws of the Utate, m nT Aad .1N ALA wWeAPON sOntinued for the befendant rR lt Ontinued for the state aU r NUN-TAX PAID Lila OR ~ defen ait enters a plea of ulity. ined ‘emnent of the Court ig that the defendant be confinec in the common Jall of Lredell County for a period of oF 4ONTHs anc assiened to work under the supervision we state Highway and /uplic Works Commission. (LCaTION ANTI ADULTHY The defendant through the @nter a plea of not guilty, Jury ir attorney, 3. |. Grier 1 Tee sR GAINST { A AUALNST ATURE ‘ shan papa through hig Attorney, J. R. Burgess enter! that there so? contendere. The Court is of the opinion 3 re 1s evidence to support that charge. ‘The defe! p 7 guilty ‘ ible trespass; the Court acceptt oe oe defendm t on probation under suc tions as the probation officer sees fit t° LOYTER hy MON TH3 on prison 5s That ag s ne Court, that the derooncitions of probation ordered by * u 8 mt he use 0 make evenicanta. Return to gehoos ta’ Senteneer 1948 ane be and remain at to pass work, Stay off the streets O has @ Job home each night after nine o'clock unless 4nd hag to “tay on the job after that hour sworn and empanelled, returned a verdict of not a IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT FIRS’ WeEX - AUGUST TERM, 19ko Monday, August ena, 19% DRLVING DKUNK Defendant called and failed. Sel Fa and Capias, Noe 1117 state vs Joe Grit'fin BRUALING AND ENTLRING Noe 1123 A TRUE BILL state vs Henry W. Houser = 2 BREAKIN 3+, ENYERING ANI oo A TRUE BILL vs Corbet Hepler No. ll2v DRIVING DRUNK ~ State Continued for the Defendant vs Walter ‘I’. klmore No. lla SREAKING, ENTERING A: — Continued for the vs Corbet Hepler No. 1125-11. SA state vs Willie J. black fog 1}12 Wa NSLAUGHTIN Judgment Nist Instanter rrocess, ota te The defendant throuvh his attorney, \. KR. Battley Vs enters 4 pleadf not guilty. avery licDowell At the close of State's C-27 for Judgment of Non-Suit. 9 1123 state BREAKIN aD a's Tish [ING 6énters 4 plea or not guilty. 400ser of guilty. 0+ lles RAKING AND EVYERING AND LARCENY State { The defendant through h Vs enters a plea of not guilty. a { T , , ‘ “tl .te James slack Yn the count for break'ng and ; olf the Court is that the defendunt at Kaleigh for a pe mr v;, | , STATE'S PRISON - than FOUK nor more than SI’ YAKS evidence cefen 1. t moves Motion 4 llowed,. The defendant bhrough his attorney, W. Kk. jattley Jury sworn and empanelled, returned a verdict s attorney. J. UW. ~ewls entering, JUIG LN’! be confilred in the riod of not less and assisned to work as provided by law, thisxusntance TIT? Un the count for larceny, JUDG is that the defendant be confined PRISON at Kaleigh for a period of’ WO nor more than FIV: YAKS and a &s provided by law, this sentence > NT of the Court in the STATE'S not less than sslyned to work to commmence immediately on the expiration of the sentence above. HIVING STOLEN PROPERTY (Value of less than (/;50.) Remanded to necvorder's Court for trial IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -- AUGUST TERM, 19)8 Monday, August 2nd, 19h% REPORT OF THE GRAND JURY /OR THE AUGUSL TERM OF IREDELL County SUPER TOR Cour 19,9 vhis Grand Jury met at the regular session on August 2nd ang 3rd and passed on eight bills that came before this Jury. Seven bills were returned as true bills and one not a true po Ge Committees were appointed to visit the various county Institutions and make their reports by the November term of Court. P. Me le Dillon P. WeNeer Dilton, Foreman Noe 105) FaLSk PRETENSE State Continued for the Lefendant vs Ruel Le Shoemaker iO. 1131 DRIVING DRUNK + > ‘ State Jont inued vs sLydé Dagenhart y * 48 Honorable Court takes recess T : t ' unt 11 i Augus 1943 at 9:30 O'clock, uesday Morning, neh Ge UE as FIRST WEEK -=- AUGUST TERM, 1 Tuesday, August 3rd, 19/4 948 This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment Tuesday yorning, August 3rd, 148 at 9:30 O'clock. ios, 1122 LARCENY The defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi sci state » ’ Fa and Caplas. Instanter Process. vs charles Smith No. 1114 & 1115 DRIVING DRUNK; ‘YO OP! RATOR'S LIcENsk state Continued for the Defendant : vs glyn Galliher No. 1126 MANSLAUGHTER State NO’ A TRUE BILL vs Tomle ul, Brown No. 1062 SPEEDING State : gudgnens of the Court is that the defendant be confinea vs | ne @ common jail of 4+redell County and assigne: to work xobert ‘league under the supervision of the state Highway and Public Works Commission for a period of SIXTY DAYs. . oCl IA DOCKET No. 1062 BOND — e is ordered thet the judgment be mace absolute 8 on @ bond to be discharged upon pa t } ? i harg L ment he nobert Teague . vd —— Yo. 1026 BOND State 4t 1s ordered that the fu vs On the bond to be discharzed iwyn Chambers ment be made ahsolute pon payment of the cost. ig & u urt is that tne Iredell County the State Hignway r his Honorable Uourt takes a recess until Monday Morning, August 9th, at 10:00 O'Clock, eocahsateenae . es « a au Cai om ~~ rae - S a Le IN THE SUP:RIOR COURT SECOND WEEK-- AUGUST TENT, 1945 Monday, August 9th, 1948 IN THE SUPERIOR courp AUGUST TERM, 19h8 This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on londay Morning, August 9th, 19403 at 10:v0 O'clock, with Honorable J. a, kK usseay, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial District Fall Term, 1940, present and presiding. ve “orrison, High -heriff of lredell County returns into Open court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this the cecond .eek of the August Term, 13944, Iredell County superior Court, toewlt: irs. Je ie Gentry FP. De hiel John L. Foard “@lvin L. Goforth to Ne Wills De Te Holmes footen Re Holland He «e sarnard empleton Lackey, ve JOLLY vherrill De Collins Blackwelder ote venson J. He James raul C. Jones wOOcrow iicCoy Je Be Prevette Fred | rrant Ae Le oims anc de &. Jolly, excused on Doctor's certificate MeCoy, was not returned T. Grant, was excused by Statute »+ srevette, was excused by Court fhe following | men constitue what shail hereinafter be termed the lint , ‘ gt Oi ‘ - 2 : ; ; ; Jury #1" to-wit: kelvin L, ‘oforth, Wi. He Wooten, J. S. Templeton, J. P. 3 we Ie Stevenson, We. Rovd an ae ; t J. 3 » “e 30yd Gray, John w. Hinton, G. M. Mills, Ge Re Holland, v » MACKEY, SPe, Je De Collings ang J Je He James, Oe , sly2 red QJ. Vaskaddon DIVOR a he Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and ‘ea Swers the issues Submitted to it as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Fred J. Caskaddon Vse Maude P, C&askaddon l. were the Plaintirgs é and the defendant lawfully married 48 allege in the complaint? answer; Sher... IN TH: SUPERIOR COURT SE@® ND WEK~-~ AUGUST TeRM, 198 Monday, august 9th, 19h 2 Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived ee prom each other for two years next preceding the br inging of this action? Answer: ‘Xes 4, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of carolina for six months next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer: Yes vorth Carolina Inthe Superior court Iredell County fred 0. Caskaddon VS. weude Pe Caskaddon this cause coming on to be heerd ard being heard before His Rousseau, and @ jury at the August Term of the s it appearing to the court that the defendant served with process, and the followiny issue y* + answered by the fur}; 1. sere the pluintiff and in the complaint? answer: "Yes", ce. Have the plaintiff ar each other for two years next preceding the brin; Answer: "Yes", 3 Has the pleintiff been e bone frolina for six months next preceding the * answer: "yes", ‘Ow therefore, on motion of Mecon is ordered, adjudged and decreed thet the and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant “skaddon, and thet the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing plaintitr ang t be and they are hereby dissolved. and it is further ordered that the pleintirf pay the oe taxed by the clerk. ‘his the 9th day of August, 19,0. Je Ae Kousseau. Judge rresiding. separate and apart North IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TERM, 1948 Monday, August 9th, 19% Noe Wh5d kd Le Deal, Plaintifr vs Vertie setzer Deal Defendant. DIVORCE The Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn ana empa answers the issues submitted to it as follows: IN THE S\PERIOR OURT AUGUST TERM, 298 CoRoT TY Van Uuhl a rLL CUUNTY La Le veal, rlaintiff VSe Vertie setzer Leal Defendant. 1. ‘ia the pb intitf and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Answer: Yes Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart period of more than two years ag alleged in the Complaint? answer: tes tne plaintiff been a bona fida resident of the State of Jort: a 1 of m 9ANn AN ] ra period of more than one year next preceeding this ection as allex vomplaint? answer: - eT ~~ ' ir Ve R rok an URT ML AV wu 4 - AUGUST TERM, 1946 setzer Deal, Lefendant ihis cau se ™ — \ - coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor, te NOusseAu, Jude ( our’ » Judge presiding and a Jury at the Way Term of the Superior lu: Of Iredell County "Ys and Lt sppeering tothe Court that the defendant has been personally served wit ¥ ith process by publication and the following issues having been is: | 4 t . 3 4 7 1 : 16a 2 anc &n: werecd OY © ry a ° l ws: Vil u 4s f 1 1. ‘ere the platr ic plaintiff andthe defendant lawfully intermerried &s alleged in the Somplaint ? answer: Yes eae ‘ * 83 the plaintirr been Or one year next preceeding Answer: yes ” a bona fida resident of the state of Nort! the bringing of this action? Z - de nave ; the plaint +Or two years Answer: Yes each other iff and the defendmt lived separate and apart {7% breeeding the bringing of this ection? Now thereto plaintirr, it 4 _ os motion of Land, Sowers & Avery, Attorney for th , 8 or dered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff, Ed le Dest be and nd he ig hereby granted an abso] | er ule divo.es arom the defendant, Vertie - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK~ AUGUST TERM, 19% Monday, August 9th, 198 and that the ponds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, It is further ordered that the plaintirr pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 9th day of August, 1948. Je A. Rousseeu Judge rresicing No. 492 Evelyn Le hitcehell DIVOnK Ch 7 whe Livorce Jury #1" being duly sworn end empanelled answers the issues submitted oo it ss follows: — William Fe Mitchell tvelyn Le Mt chell Mitchell 1. Did the pleintirfr and the cefendent intermarry as elleged in the Complée int? answer; Y@s. Has the plaintiff been « six months next preceding the answer. Yes. Lid the ceferdant separate from the plaintiff enc have they Via sived separate ard apart for e period of two years or more #s alleged answer, “Velyn Le iil tche]]l Vv VS, “Llliem “ee kitehel] TT ‘his cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the August Term, 19u¢ 749 Supertor c as te ; Perior Court of iredell County, before His Honor, J. A. Jousseau, Judge ‘Tesiding and * “Cin th £ Jury, and the Jury having answere: 6@l1l the issues submitted to *@vor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as fully appears In the "ecord; and it appearih to the Court that there was born of the marriage f the , : Plaintiff and the defendant three children, namely Nelson Mitchell, 16, erbeng M i ‘Itehel] 15, and Sue Mitchell 13, and that the plaintiff herein has iy CoD I b i bc ed ue es oa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK-- AUGUST TERM, 1948 monday, August 9th, 194d the care and custody of said chilcren; and it further Eppeari ng to the ¢ : Ourt and the Court finds as a fact that the plaintiff is a fit ana suitable pe : Yson to have the custody and control of the minor children, ‘“elson Mitchell Barh . » Darbens Ltenell and sue ‘itehell, and that the best interest of said minors WOULE bp served by baling in the custody of their mother, she being found to be a fit tr for the custody of said minors. it is, therefore, orcered, aciudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be 6nd t) 9 t Ue same are hereby Cissolvec, and the pleintiff is hereby granted an absolute ¢ : CAV Ores ¢ from the cefendent. It 1s further ordered, adjudged anc decreed that the S+ nha y an sh — . + witchell, = she ls hereby awarded full and complete care, custo: Q f 4 the minor children, Nelson ‘Ltchell, Sarbsera Mitchell ane Sue ihis cause, in : ‘elates to the custody of the minor chil Je A. Kousseau Judge rresfding 1" being duly sworn and empanelleé submitted to it as follows: Had the ai j } nt f é } ; l n iff ano defendant lived separate : each Ootner ror nore than ; Y Wee aa < years n , years next before the commencement of this action Had the Lla v.18 Plaintifr: hee her fen & resident of North Carolina for more GS months r I S next preceding the brine ne of this actionoe yea. | pseing! IN THE SUPERIOR CouRY SECOND WKEK -- AUGUST Thkm, 1948 Monday, august 9th, LIWG NORTH CAROLINA TREDELL COUNTY tinnie Cruse Wilson, : Plaintiff. VSe J. Ge Wilson, Defendant. This cause comin+s on to be heard and being heard J. Ae Rousseau, Judge Presiding and a Jury at the Aurust Gorn of the court of tredell County and it appearing to the sric judge that t properly brought and tried; that the proper issues were submitted to the them answered by the said fury in favor of the sai plaintiffs. It 13 therefq@e, ordered, adjudged and decreed thet the matrimony heretofore existing between the said plaintifs and they are Geclared by the court Gissolved and his case before His Honor Super} she Livorce Jury #1" being answers the issues submitt is the plaintiff, G. kK. Pack, ares n&6s he been a resicent of the state of North C lina ail hi Sis 4426 &8 glle-sze ‘ “seged in the complaint and for more than one before filing cOmpleint, “nswer Yes c. Were the ple intiff, G. RK. Peck, and the defendant, sear] ‘uly married . ; “ed on the 2 day of January, 1916, as alleged in the complaint? “answer Yes , 2 de id the defendant, Pearl Pack, abandoned the plaintiff, %. ‘ack, with- out any just cause on the part of the plaintiff on or about the l2 da Y of fk ¢ oe . ebruary, 1946, and has the defendant lived separate and apart from th ® platr : Plaintirr since that time and more than two years prior to the inst t a ltution of this action? Answer Yes ws ortr 8 rack, or + . Above IN TE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK - AUGUST TERM, 1946 Monday, ‘tugust 9th, 1946 NURTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR IKEDELL COUNTY Ge Ke rack VSe rearl Pack This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and after the jury x. duly impanelled and the judge passing on the evidence and the evidence being submitted to the jury and after his Honor J. A. Kousseau charge to the Jury ay submitted of the following issues: 1. Is the plaintirf, Ge. k. Pack, a resident of the state of Nort: sarolina and has he been e resident f the state of North Cerolina all his lt as alleged in the complaint and for more than one year before filing complaint: answer Yes “ere the plaintiff, G. kh. Pack, and the defendant, Pearl Pack, éuly married the ¢ day of January, 1916, as alleged inthe complaint? ies a 4e Lid the defendant, Pear] rack, abandoned the plaintiff, G. R, tH any just c&use on the part of the plaintiff on or about the l2 day of toler bibs reoruary, 1946, and hes the Getendant lived separate and apart from the plaintl: ainr hea ma : = tagt Since that time ary iore n two years to the institution of this &ctio answer Yeg the jury heaving answered the issues as set out above in favor of th plaintiff and against the céftendant,. Af 4S THEREFORE, vraered, ediudged and decreed, that the donds of me "oY , . no h h ; atrimony now existin between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved and tha iY hesolu ee t an a sOCiute divorce be zranted the plaintiff, S. Wy . Packe ‘his the 9th cay of August, 1944, IN THE SUPERIOR © uUR® SECOND WKEK -- AUGUST TERY, 1948 fonday, August 9th, 19hu yo. 4527 waude S» Shell, DIVORCE the Divorce Jury #1" being duly sworn ana empanelled v3 answers the issues submitted to it as follows: willard Pe shell In the Superior Court ORTH CAROLINA, | | August Term, 1946 IREDALLL COUNTY. aude Se ohell, Vse willerd P. ~hell ( 1. lid the plaintiff, aude S. Shell, and the defendant, Willerd >. Shell, intermarry as alleged in the compleint ? ANSVER Y@S-~ Have the plaintiff, Maude S. Shell, and the defendant, Willard P. shell, lived separate and apart from each other for two con- secutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this a: tion? ANSWER Yes. 4. Has tie plaintiff, ilaude —. Shell, been & bone fide resident f the stete of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the commencement of this action? ANS WER YESe NoR™ e.poir te NALIN CankJULl thy TRENT? ATT CMU LREDE.LL VV ULL Le weude S. Shell, rleaintiff, Vs. ‘llard >, shell, Lefencant, This cause coming on to be heard, anc being heard by His 4onor T : ' Ve he AOusseau, Judge Presiding, and a jury, at the Au tust Term, 19.4, “uperior Vourt for Iredell County, North Carolina, and the following issues h ana mvéng been submitted to, and answered, by the jury, to-wit: 1. Did the plaintiff, Maude S. Shell, and the defendant, Willard ?, § i‘ hell, intermarry &s alleged in the complaint? answer Yes, i, ied Ce Have the plaintiff, Maude S. Shell, and the defendant, Willard me diats lived separate and apart from eech other for two consecutive years ®1y prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes, Of the s4,2° Has the plaintiff, Maude S. Shell, been a bona fide resident commen vs of North Carolina for six months immediately preceding the cement of this action? answer yeg, RRA, Snags ae ‘ny : = Sedenantoene IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TEKM,1948 Monday, august 9th, 194% The Court further finds that summons in this action wag issued } y the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the lst day of June 1 ’ 0 Yin aN, and was served personally on the defendant, Willard P, Shell, one June 2 r 4) Sut doey by We re Johnson, ~eputy Sheriff of Iredell County, North carp lina, by readt, the summons to the defendant, and by leaving with him a copy of the Summon g, and a copy of the Complaint. RE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED aND p CREED, That th bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Maude Ss, Shell, and the defendant, Willard ¢. Shell, be, and they are, dissolved, and the plaintiff, Meude &. Shell, is «ranted an abm lute divorce from the defendent, WLllard ry. shell. Let the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff, this the jth dsy or august, 19k. Je Ae Kousseau Judge Presiding ‘ne sivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn and empanelic: . answers the issues submitted to it as follows: neid In the Superior Court august Term, 196 <_ <> eee ec ymond Eugene Keild, and the defendant, lous the complaint? ® < * ‘ntiff, Raymond Lucene Reic, and the defendant, so ive Loulse Coley apart from each other for two consec lived sepsrate and years im edia te rior to + se NS SS commencement of this action? answer yes 1as the platy I 1 J 7 plaintiff, Raymond lugene Reld, been a bona fide ree the ta @ of No h co ww Vd NOrth E? ’ li din 6 -4aTro nea f OY six mont? Ss Limr ediately prece ne t this actions “nswer Yes, en meee IN THE SUP::RIOR Court SECOND WEEK~-- AUGUST TERI, 19]8 Monday, August 9th, 1948 In the Supertor Court CAROLINA, NORTH August Term, 194 raymond Hugene Reid, Plaintiff, VS. Louise Coley Reid, Defendant. 4 This cause coming on to be heard, and veing heard by His J. Ae Rousseau, Judge Presiding, and a fury at the August Tern, 1943, court for Iredell County, North carolina, and the following submitted to anc &nswered by the jury, to-wit: 1. Lid the plaintiff, Reymond Eugene Reic » an louise Coley Heid, intermarry 4&s allesed in the compkint answer Y@S-~e e. Have the plaintiff, Reymond “veene Reid, and the defer loulse Coley Reid, lived seperate and epert from eech other for two secutive years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yé@s. 3. Has the pleintiff, Raymond Eugene resicent of the Stete of North Cerolins for six m the commencement of this action? answer Yes e the defendant by publication published in Iredell County, North Carol aft dq Ymran 3 Of 8@10 gsumrons we n the 4rd dey of 4 ¥ GCefencant wag in NS IDERED, ORLERED, ‘onds of matrimon, neretofore existing between the plaintiff the defendant D6, and they are, dissolved, and thet the plaintiff is *n absolute divorce from the defendant. Let the cost of this action oy the plaintirr, This the 9th day of august, 19). x a IN ‘HE SUPERIOR court IN THE SUPERIOR COURY Pr | SSCOND WEEK -- AUGUST TERW, 1948 SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TERM, 1948 “Monday, august 9th, 1948 monday, August 9th, 19d OKA CAROLINA In the Superior court that the best interest of sald chilcren would be served by them ORTH CARJLINA, August Term, 19) [IREDELL COUNTY. in the dustody of their father. being IT Is, THEREFORE, OKDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Kaymond ugene Keid F 1) eink aymo v , 1. That the plaintiff, Raymond Lugeae Reid, be, and he is hereby Plaintiff, | granted full and complete custody and control of Beulah Ruth eh Ken Sone is RD'K FOR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDRE : = as . ' eds Louise Keild, the aforesaid minor children, Louise Coley Reid, 2. This cause is retained for such further orders as may be fust befendant. and propere It further appears to the Court that the above entitled action This cause coming on to be hard, and being heard by His Honor j, was brought by the plaintiff for an absol ite iivoree from the defendant on Kousseau, Judze Presiding at the August Term, 1948, Superior Court for I ll ; : oussesu, Judg , . - . Mati os the ground of two years separation, and for the custody of the eforesuia County North Csroiina and it apvearineg to the court anc the court finding &g 5 3 : ’ ’ t - ’ . = minor children, and that a judg mente 2 ant ing the plaintit . an absolute fact: divorce from the defendant hes already been entered at this term of Iredell 1 Pe 7 County Superior Court. anat two children were born to the marriage union between the plains s ‘ 2 — e , this the 9th day of August, 190. and defendant, their names and ayes belnz ag follows: 1. Beulah Ruth Keld, a dauzhter, born June 13, 194d, and now ten vears of ave, ‘Mulla Loulse Reld, a caughter, born June 19, 19/,0, and now elgtt no 20 years og aye, ° 43 orothea Conner Ce IVOR CE > ie : . ‘ nor Ss Nivore Jury #1" being culy ° and emnoan led “hat the defendant, Louise Coley Keld, mother of the aforesaid minor v ihe ivorce Jurs i ein 1} sworn nd elled . answers the issues submitted to it es follows: es a : ; - af Ve Russell Lee “oanconed the father and the two minor children on the 25th day of ' 1 le since that time s} Mas not visited the children, and hes not contect® °C! 1, and hag nc eard of by the father of the chibdren, and st her whereabouts . Vs. je hs mon « ; , kis “nat sumrions publication, setting forth that the fatter was @st for the control and custody of the aforesaid minor children, was duly publisit ie id the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry es alleged ; 1e@ af Q&la n i ’ : : ‘ in the statesville Da! Caroli *n the complaint? Ssville Daily, a newspaper published in 4redell county, North Csr ™ ™ for four Onsec , ‘ 1, ' . Oo}, 4 n¢ ans we consec itive weeks, the last pub ieation being on June 24, LILO, ant wer. yes . che Court find nm & _ . het H > r . : N h ferc v nes that the defendant has been Culy served with summons, 8nd u ce Has the plaintiff lived in the state of North Caroline for eek wa eee / one 1 ; no answer has been filed, year next precee jing the comiencement of this action? ' Answer, Yes lhe *nat the minor children, Beulah Ruth “eid and Julia Louise Reid, d+ Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apert are now living with lrom ®8@ch oth their father, Kaymond kugene Reid, and have lived with er for two years preceeding the commencement of this action? 2 & sor 4 , hy ay nat yy ’ vat enc been supported by him at ell ti mes since the 25th day of May, 194% “are TGs Cc 66 Je And it furthe further “peearing to the Court, and the Court finding *§ , fact that the y and Plaintiff igs » fit and Suitable pers on to have the custod cont ro > minx 1 of the minor children, Seulah Ruth Reid and Julia Louise Reid, IN THE SUPERIOR COUR” SHOO ND WEEK -- AUGUST ‘TERY ,1948 Monday, August 9th, 196 state of North Carolina Iredell County borothea Connor Vse Russell Lee Connor this cause coming on to de heard before His Honor J, A, Kousseau, rresiding Judge, and a jury, at the August Term, 1943 of the Iredell County Superior Court, and the case having been submitted to a jury and the jury having answered the issues as contained in the records in favor of the Plaintiss and against the defendant. It is, therefore, orcerec, adjudged md decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and they are hereby, diss>lved and the plaintiff ts granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. the plaintiff is texed with the costs of this action, Je «ae Rousseau rresiding Judge Ve 49¢% Hristine lliott Brown eae vVaAVUN ts wa. the Divorce Jury 41" vdeing duly sworn and empanelit: answers the issues submitted to it as follows: thomas Leroy Brown TI Con vy Witih sANU Lisa, y TT AAIPn. &.\t.4 ale nristine slliot+ Brown 4 V8. { Leroy Srown j 1. Did the plaintiff ana defendant marry each other, and are they now husband and . 4 . anc wife, as alleged in the complaint? anSwer; Yes, c+ Didthe pla intiff and defe separate and ndant separate, and have they Lived De te gt ypitt part from each other Tor more than two years prior to the instit Of this acti —— On, &3 alleged in the complaint? answer: Yes, 4. Hag +} saa comb ® Plaintiff been a bonifide resident of the State of North Carolina for mo re than six months before the commencement of this action, 8 Allevzed in the complaint? Answer: yes, IN THi: SUPERIOR COUR? SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TeRM, 1944 monday, August 9th, 198 yorth Caroline, In the superior Court, Iredell countye August Term, 198 christine klliott Brown 4 VSe ynomas Leroy Brown y This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this ‘erm of the superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before His Honor, J, Ae Rousseau, Judge Presiding, anda jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to it by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record: it is, therefa@e, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Christine hlliott Brown, and the defendant, Thomas Leroy Brown, be, and the same ere hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute Civoree fron the defendant. Je Ae Housseau Judge Presiding North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. fugust Term, 19id2 Christine Elliott Brown Vs. ORDER FORCUSTODY O] ‘nomas Leroy Brown i this cause coming on to be heard, and being heard by His Honor, ve Ae Rousseau, Judge rresiding, at the august erm, lu, cuperior Court for for Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court, and the vourt finding as a fact: ‘ 1. ‘hat one minor child, namely; Thomas Harold Brown, was born ‘0 the marriage union between the plaintiff and defendant, said child having én Dorn on the 9th day of October, 194. - é» ‘That the said minor child is now living with his mother, the paintit?, and has lived with and been supported by his mother, the plaintiff, sinoe the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on the Sth day of May, 19);3, exdept ow’ 8 small amount which has been contributed by the defendant. " de And it further appearing to the Court, and the Court finding iid contr — the plaintiff is a fit and suitable person to have the custody and upeed of said minor child, and that the best interest of said child would be “ved by being in the custody of his mother. IT Is THEREFORE , URDiRED, aDJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That the plaintiff, be, and she is hereby granted full and CO: au” Custody and control of Thomas Hurold Brown, the aforesaid minor e. ‘this cause is retained for further orders. 88 broush It further appears to the Court that the above entitled action ® gro = by the plaintiff for an absolute divorce from the defendant on minop sant of two years separation and for the custody of the aforesaid {rom the 1d, and that a judgment granting the plaintiff an absolute divorce “Ounty x defendant was granted at the August Term, 19,4, of the Iredell Y Supertop Court, this the 9 day of August, 19h8. y gust, 19%, Je A. Rousseau Judge Presiding. SEER ETE ETE EEE EERE Et I NN ee oe Cen inp 1 — a ( | b- S © Le —= — 5 a e ia ‘ . ) } 4 4 : ia ‘ ’ Monday, Noe 4529 waomt fhambers Lackey answ vackey 4 jury plaintthy +3, t erefore, ordere Nheretafan Neretofore existin: August 9th, 1946 Divorce Jury #1" being duly Sworn and ers the issues submitted are tO it as follows: defendant intermarry OMpara? IN THe SUPERIOK couKy SECUND WEEK -- AUGUST TuRM, 1 IL.8 wondgy , August 9th, lho ’ ioe 453e alle Je He Wilson NIVORO Ve, the Divorce Jury /1" being duly swonn « , wer « } wo ser Hc Ompene } answers G 18 issues Submitted t it as fr 17 W : . iled 70 lt as follows: .ffie Sheets ‘ilson ae f North Caro}! Complaint ? being heard at the August ‘er ) wy } , tr tr t 10g ty, before lils Honor J. A. Rousseau, Judge } a Naving answered all the issues submitted f' and against the defendant, as ff S 8uc4 5 } i, adjudved and decreed that the bonds of Vanz bet r . . and ween the plaintiff anc the defendant be, 4M re hereby 8 lere OX lssolved, ane om the defendant, ints . of August, he niente ¢ psolute the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolu 19h, 0 Je .26 Kousseau Judge Presiding srm of [rede] } nn ’ P@siding ang 616 Court ’ Record; ‘ Ane ' be . . . ? 3 3 d it further appearing that the plaintiff end defendant have one whie OI ' . h iow in the custody of the Mother, the defendant. it 1s the refore ordered and adjudged vhat the defe “8 permanen t — . * ‘ 4 . Custody of the said child, Lois Jean Wilson, end that the pleintirt ' to pay t} v tne of < t . sum of €250.u0 per year for the support of the said child until si Marries » ~ Or resches the aye of elghteen years; | ; rs A Lg turther ( roered — ° 7 | - | | iy | Matty mont S ¢ existing between the pleintiff, Wm. Je Ae Wilson and the “Sfendant , “ffle Sheets “Wilson, be and the same are hereby dissolved, and the Pint ify + i . ° granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. Je Ae Kousseau _ JUDGE PRES IDI NG IN THE SUrERIOR COUR oiCO ND \WhiikkKe= AUGUST TERM, 1948 wonday, August 9th, 1946 Noe 4547 Leetha oummers DIVOK CE fhe Tivorce Jury #1" being duly sworn an answers the issues submitted to it ag Poll ay mere le ieatha summers ana the defendant intermerry as &lleged resident of the stat the filinz of this Om}; jultery as alleged in the omple int? the the defenant, there was namely; hat the pleintiff herein h further aprearing to the Court én ee iff is e fit and suitable person nave th aA cust 0a y Py A con ‘ Ton - \ nA “All rol of the minoy hilcren, Yerry Marcus Summers 6c sOyee ~lizebeth summere A ' : o uMMers, ana that the best interest of sa fd minors would be served DY beine in t {t 6 custody f their mother, she being found to be @ sustody of ss ic minors, therefor ' oreé, ordered, adjudged snd decreed that the bonds 0! bé “ ~ 5 5 3 d the etween the plaintiff and defendant be, end Sa'e are al irom the G¢Tendant [ Ue it 1s further orderec, adjudged and decreed that the plaintirgs, leatha , ~ummers, b } » S86 and she is hereby awarded full and complete C'reé, custody ana J nc contr ¢ Ontrol of the minor children, Jerry Marcus Summers _- vOyYCe Llizabeth eummers, the plaintirr ig heeby granted an absolute ati IN THE SUPERIOR court SECOND WEEK=-- AUGUST tbh, 1948 monday, August Yth, 19s his cause, in so far &s Lt relates to the custody ainor ehilcren, is retained for further orders, this the 9th day of August, 19)4, T ve 4, NOUSSEAY 1) 7 D. f . vucce Presiaing mice Phis cause coming hear » the Court he opinion that this ty, a . 3 oe instituted specail rroceeding before lpadal? Mara. eee ° + -redell County Ch Carolina under the Generel stetus s entitle a 7 ; ; : it is therefore ordered, adjudged anc decreed, réman } . « énded to the lerk of ~wuperior ourt of tredell County & Specie] ‘roceedin + f& unier the statute hereinbefore set fat “Slendant Jeff p . 9 ; “vs e0it Resh be allowed in his Answr to set the way - « . ‘~ OF new matter and affirmative rellef and the tO Answ ad 6 1 } + rand that the matter be properly instituted before the Clerk a: hereinbefore « . Sore Provided with the Gefendant in this action, betns the moving party, At ts further orcered, sdjudged snd decreed that the defendent % restre: alr , ' ied from blocking or interferring in any manner with the use of “his roadwe: 0adwey until the 9th aay of September, 190, in which time this Matter on Oe Properly heard before the Clerk of’ Superior Court of Iredell “Ounty, ‘orth Vsrolina, and if it has no t he heard before the Clerk by th dey of September 1944, the Temporary Restraining Order is dissolved. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -e- AUGUST TEKM, 19) Monday, august 9th, 1944 by consent of the parties of this action shall be Cons ldered to 4), intents am purposes as having been instituted properly before the Cler, a superior Court of Iredell County as hereinbefore provided, this the Sth day of august, 1940. Je Ae Kousseau Judge rrestding consént nad, ©OWEers « avery ise ac Les ave 7 ure attorneys f or Plaintiff e ale sattley attorneys for Defencant ourt that the pleintiff and the sOntroversy existing between them, anc perty settlement has been entered into vet n the office of the hegister of Deeds of :rect. page 43l, ane fer Theat the separatic! arreeme: :, S00ve referred to, all as recorded - . , ® Yr ’* 4redell County, as hreinabove referred are 4 Sse com ‘ ' . vs8 Jucgment as fully es if copies herein, and are @cts approved by the court. furt er 0 Aan ss o na‘ 1 Pr orcered, adjudged and iecreed that the defendant P. a ’ mney lee of adams T ” y . f » -@armen and “inberry, Counsel for the plaintiff, amount Agreed on r h prior to the Signing of this judgment, and that ¢ cost of this action, this the th day of ; Je Ae Rousseau ~ » ve AUgust, 1945, Judge Presiding. By consent: agdeams, Dearme ss. an & IY, ny ‘ , inberr ye Attorneys for Plaintiff, land, Sowers & « Sous powers & very Attorneys lor jefendant IN THE SUPLRIOR couR? SECOND WEEK -= AUGUS'? ‘eRy 1948 Monday, august 9th, 1948 yo. 4538 NORTH CAROLINA In the Supertor Court IREDELL COUNTY pffie Daniels Plaintiff Vs. Charles Le Daniels, Defendant 9 and Fe Ce Daniels { yarnishee ‘ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Hon or, J. aeXousseau, Judge presidin:, at the Ausust » 190, term of the cuperior vourt of Iredell County, upon the ap lication of the pleintiff for alimony predente lite; and it appesring to the Court that this ts an action for alimony without divorce; and it further apnearine: to the ourt from complaint ard afficavit filed in this cause that the plaintiff o the rellef demanied and that the pleintiff hasfot suffictent mean: Guring the prosecution of this ection a jefray ty! anc necessary expenses thereof; ar the defendant has abondened the plaintiff ar it further appearing to the Court ¢ garnishee in this cause that tre ssid carnishee + items of personal property set forth in sat d defendant and the garnishee own a one-half interest each and that said personal property is covered by a certain chattel m rtgage payable to the Statesville rroduction Credit association, bearing date of august 6, 1947 and recorced tn Hook Loy at page 96 of the iredell County hegistry; fn¢ it further appearing to the Court that there is a principal balance due on said chattel mortgace of {1035.00 together with interest on unpaid balances at the rate of eo per annum; it 1s now ordered that the defendant pay to the plaintiff alimony “tthe rate of s100 per mont payable on or before the 10th cay of each Calendar month curing the pendency of this action or until the further order W this Court; anda it is further ordered that the carnishee deliver the Popert. a ‘ : ’ Perty described in the answered filed by sai’ garnishee to the Sheriff and ¢ 4 hat the sherire shall sell saic personal property at public auction for ; fash to the last and highest bidder, after having first advertised PALA ap ¥ for fiftean eave at the Courthonueae door in Tredel) Sonnty ana at thr °@ other public places in said county end also having advertised ~ G2 Ase ee oo _ if IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WKEK -- AUGUST TERM, 1948 monday, august 9th, 1946 saic sale for once a week for two euccessive weeks immediately preceda{ 4 ng said sale in some newspaver published in said County; and it is further ordered that fromthe proceeds of said sale, the Sheriff shal] PAY first tr costs of said sale; then pay to the Statesville Production Credit Assoctatto, the amount of {tts lien on said property together with the interest due ii. On, then p&y one-half of the balance bo F, C, Dentels, garnishee, ang pay the remainin: balance into the offices of the Clerk of the Supertor Court: ¢ for the use and benefit of the plaintiff as herein set forth; an‘ it ts further orcered that the Clerk of the Superior Court, out of the sum 80 received shall pay to the plathti?f for the maintenance of herself and her sum of J1.0 per month curing the pendency of this action, furtner order of this Court, or until said sum is exhausted, Je Ae Kousseau Judge Presiding this term on motion of Burke « 3urke, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TERM, 1948 Monday, August 9th, 194% entire record in the cause is hereby referreg to; that it ar ears from said record that the publication was complete prior to the convenins of this term of court, and that the Court has jurisdiction, but that the time in which the defendant is allowed to answer wil} not expire until the close of this daye It further enpearinz to the Court thet the plaintirr hes had the custody and care of the children since tre defendent abandoned them se J2isOK ) ly is alleged in the complaint; that his whereabouts ix unknown to the plaintifr, and that the pleintiff is entitled to have the matter tried anc Cisposed of as e@rly @s she can. it is, therefore, on motion of 3urke & Burke, attorneys for plaintiff, orcered that seid cause be transferred to Alexenéer Cou: ty, being in the 15th. Judicial District, in order that the same may be tried and disposed of at the next term of alexander Superior Court whicn convenes august 40th, 1944, and it is further ordered that pendinz sald final 4ie- position that the plaintiff is hereby given the ab olute eustody of the minor chil’ren named in the complairt, to-wit, Ray “ennedy, anc shirley ame Kennedy, subject to such order as the trial Judge may make + It is further ordered that the Clery of the superior Court of’ Iredell County place this order on record and that he properly index the sauéy @nc that the Clerk of this Court transfer all papers in this case to the Llerk of the cuper:or Court of alexander ‘ounty. the 9th. dey of August, 19u¢. te « Rousseau 76 rresiding, Je & _ + A hc earin: to the Court that the plaintif! af rior f tredell County on the 17 day of Lute 1. oreé on the grounds of two years! separation ace ne two children, a son, Ray Kennedy, 1 years of % wie Aenredy, 1) years of age, as set forth in the at further a ‘ - earing that the plaintirr ane defendant were living in Iredell S0unty at +} \ , y at the time the Cefendant abandoned the plaintiff and the chiliren above ; oes nemeds; that the cr Lor . , hertiff f ndot "aft d i of Iredell returned the summons ¢ alter ue ] lizence ana ; na search archite Kennedy ts not to be found in Iredell ounty." That «ee ee nei Sifidavit was made and an orcer of publication made by the sLOYkK of } ; nena me superior Court of lredell County, and notice was published in d atesvili a 4:¢ "etly Perona for faup weels, the firet publication being vune ly na » “7405 &nd the last Publication pvinter filed with the Clerk. ‘The ’ gee IN THE SUPiKIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TERM, Monday, August 9th, 1948 NOe 4958 NORTH CAROLINA, In the supertor Court IREDELL COUNTY. Koss He Miller, administrator of i the ustate of John G. Miller, deceased, Ross H. Miller, individually, { and wife, Mery Lizzte Hiller, 4 q : urs. .ffle ‘iller, widow, of John G. lller, deceased, “rs. xthel setzer ( and husband, H. Se etger, Mrs. Vadse tucson and husband, 3. L. Hudson, 4 ‘lke anchusband, Shufford in wiiller, unmarried, WH. { LT Frankie killer, H. x, ivanell illler, bh. H. ( Rosie liller, James wifes, sue ‘iller, and § inor, 0 y Plaintiffs, lller, vrs. Effte filler, Mrs mthel setzer, Yrs, sOlemén Willer, vw. H, Miller, H. E. Miller, £.% “Va ire Viller, « minor, by her Gua #45, Iredell County superior for the sum of Eisht Hundred +h of Vrs. Effie Miller, and then pais iministrator of the said Mrs. sffie : filler, and that 8 wn, , 5° - ‘anute Docket 27, page lye, in the office of the ¢ Ol Lredell coun ty. the purpose a intention to set apart the said bight JO } he h » vem? SO De used in paying the funeral expenses and the last Nea A sickness of iirs, “ffle Milley, and any other just and valle mit , } “ent be in her estate, 4 de that Since ¢} ; Che afore ry ~OPesaLa Judgment was entered it has been necess# for Ss {fie rs iiiile ¢ Miller to chenve 3 t to chenze her place of residence, and that she went " home of her son , ‘ mite The Be ML —s ” ller, to live; that in order to provide a home for the sald H. ky y © seid H. Eb, Miller haa to build 48n additiong room in his house; that He Be “Lller was put S Sullt this room, the same: that + ane 5 at 6the af : *°r@said room cost Three Hundred Dollars ($30U.00) oF . IN THe SUPERIOR couRT SECOND WHEK -- AUGUST IHRM, 1948 Monday, August 9th, 196 to build, and the same has been paid for by H. Ee idiller, lie {hat the undersigred believe that Since H. &. Miller is furnishing the room far Mrs. Effie Miller that he should de paid the cost of builéine said room, to-wit the sum of Three Hundred Ollars (1:4) )U0). 5. that your petitioners believe that the judgment entered at the November Term 19.5 Iredell County superior Court, and hereinbefore referred to, should be modified and changed, and that from the said sum of Eteht Hundred Dollars (4300.00), hereinbefore referred to, there should be naia to H. h- Miller to reimburse him for the eost of buil‘ing the room herein- before referred to, the sum of ‘hree Huncrea bollarg (+4 QO), ard that the remaining sum of Five Hundred Dollars ( 59030) should be held in accordance wlth the provistons of the aforementioned Sonsent Jud ment. 66 that the aforementioned Consent provide for the Geposit or holding of Five Hundred Ollars (%5 paid to the Lxecutor or Administrator of “rse &ffle Miller instead of Hundred Dollars (3400.0uU). Rh, the undersigned pray: 1. ‘that the Consent Judgment entered at the November ‘erm 19:5 4redell County superior Court be chanyed and modified to provide for the deposit or holding of Five Hundred Dollars (°50 .0U), instead of Eicht Hundred Dollars |; 000.00), to be paid to the ixecutor or Administrator ot “Ts. Effie Miller, 2. That the Court order that the sum of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) from the said sum of bight Hundred Dollars ( 6VU0.0U), provided for in the Consent Judgment, be paid to H. x. Miller toreimburse him for the cost of building the room which Mrs. iffie Miller is Occupying. d+ ‘that the aforesaid Consent Judgment remain in full force and effect ®xcept as modified in accordance with this petition. ye ‘that a Consent Judgment be entered in this matter in ®&ccordance with the prayer herein contained, and that the Attorneys of "cord heretofore consenting to the judgment entered, consent to the 3 g ™difteation and change for and on behalf of the respective parties for mon they ®xecuted the original. 5+ That any cost in connection with the modification of said Jud n ‘ Sment be paid from the said sum of Eight Hundred Dollars ($400.00). eg ag pe ‘i & i G | i S a ue G wYse Vada Hudsor IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK == ANGUST TERM, 1948 Monday, August 9th, 1948 Respectfully submitted, this the _— day of April, 19k, Ross He Miller Koss H. Miller Mrs. &ffie Miller Mrs. Effie Willer ELthel Setzer ars Ethel Setzer ~ “rge Vada Hudgon Mrs. Vada Rudson Mrs. Brita Wike rs. Brite Wire Coleman Miller Coleman lilier We He Miller we He Miller le He Miller He. Ee Miller lLugene Miller Fugene Miller James Soite Miller James Cotte “ilbr 7 Suedell Cannon Nva Mae !iller, a =Inor, 5) her Guardian ; : - = * a State eS, &@ Notary public of the eforesaid County and State, “0 Neredy certify that Ross H, Miller, iirs. Efftle Miller, Mrs. Ethel Setzer, Ny Mrs. Brita ike, Coleman Miller, We He Miller, He Ee Miller ve Te Miller personally appeared before me this day, and acknowledged due execution of the foregoing Petition for the Modification and Cnange -Onsent Jud rment, and for all ‘ elon, »f the purposes expressed in said Petit NiSS my hand and official seal, this the day of ‘ay, 19). Re Le Boges cement Yotary Public onAL ) “y Commission expires: 7-ly-h9 4 COLUMBIA. [, Daniel PF, Walsh, a I tri ee Y “atriet of Columbia, do hereby certify that James Coite Miller personally appeared before me this day, 6* and acknowledged the due exec ition of the for Petition for the Modification and for all of th going a Chanve of a Consent Judgne ng an © purposes ©xpressed in said Petition. Wotan seis my hand and official seal, this the 11th day of May,17h% \ “Af Oba 4) Daniel F,. Walsh ——— My commission expires: 94-51 Notary Public ‘al " {ngto% Notary Public in and for the City of Wash IN TH# SUPERIOR Cour? SECOND WHEK -- AUGUST TERM, 1918 monday, August 9th, 19yu, stats OF WUTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF HORRY I, Le 3. Dawes, a Notary Public in and for the aforesaid County and state, do hereby certify that Mrs. suddell Cannon, General Guardian of pve Mae Miller, a minor, personally appeared before mé this day, and acknow- ledged the due evecition of the foregoing retition ror the modification and change of a Consent Judgment, and for all of the purposes expressed in said petition. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this the 26 day of way, 19h. Le te Dawes Notary rublic (NOTARY SEAL) My commissione xplires: NORTH CAROLINA, In the supertor Court august Term, 19% IREDELL COUNTY. Koss He Killer, administrator of the sstate of John Ge Miller, deceased, Koss He. Miler, individually, and wife, dary Lizzie willer, Plaintiffs, VSe “rss Lffle Willer, widow of John G. ‘Lller, deceased, iirs. &thel Setzer and husband, H. i. setzer, irs. Vada Hudson anc husband, 4. L. Hudson, Mrs. Brita ike { and husband, Shufford ‘ike, Coleman Miller, unmarried, W. He. Miller and wife, Frankie 4 Miller, H. x, Miller ard wife, x«vanell Miler, be He Miller and wife, Rosie Millerg James Voite ilk yr and wife, sue Miller, and “va Wae iiiller, a Minor , , Defendants. ( thls cause coming on to be heard, and bein. heard by His Honor Je ae Rousseen, Judge rresiding at the Aucust Term, 1944, Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon the petition filed by the pleintiffs and defendant 5 in the above entitled matter, and upon a motion of Adams, armin & Wnoerry, Attorneys for Koss H. Miller, Administrator of the state ot John G, Miller, Koss kK. Miller and wife, Mary Lizzie Miller, Mrs. Effie ‘ler, Widow of John Ge Miller, iirs. Ethel setzer and husband, H. Ss. setzer, Ts, Vada Hudson and hus band, KB Hudson, Mrs. Brita Wike and husband, Shure v lufforg “ike, and Coleman Miller, and the Court finds: l. That at the November term, 1945, Iredell County Superior Court, a ud - ‘dgnent: whiten 8 recorded in Minute Docket 27, page 142, was entered in th ® above *ntitled action, and that paragraph (e) in said judgment was as follows: ee ee ee es = IN THi: SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST Tkkm, 1948 sway Vedal wonday, August 9th, 1944 "(e). that the sum of Etght Hundred ollars (300.00) be os the Administrator in the Merchants and Farmers Bank of otatesville, North ° Carolina, on a Certificate of Depsit or Savings Account, payable to the ixecutor of Administrator of the Estate of Mrs. uffie Miller, which Corti ftou, of -eposit or Savings Account Book shall be held by the Honorable Ce By Binh igqe in his possession until such time as it is surrendered to the duly ma qu.lified cutor or administrator of Mrs. Effie Miller, oa That He i.e Miller, in w der to provide a home for his mother, ting. fle Willer, has built an additional room in his house at a cost of $3u0.09, and irs. ~ffie Miller is now livin: in said room being furnished to her by Ee Miller. plaintirfs and all of the defendants in the above petition with the Court duly acknowledzed, in sum of 33 0 be paid to H. E. Vilker from the \e) of the aforementioned Judgment, and that sald ©G00.00 be hele uncer the same provisiors hereinbefore referred to. Judgment entered at the November Term, 1%5, iredell Cou modified ag prayed for in the petition of he plaintiff's -JO set up under paragraph (e) of the sfore- be paid to H. He. Miller to reimburse biz for the cost ®ccommocvatilons provided for his mother, irs. Lller court cost of this mitt Pearman & Winberry, Att services the sum af sum of °300.00 to-wit the sum 0 Nerth het the remain and Farmers sank of Statesville, & Certificate of Yeposit or Savings Account, paynble to the cutor or Administrator of the Lstate of wrSe Effie Miller, which Certifit Deposit or Savir , - j c. B, Winber we etkes account Hook ghal | be held by the Honorable Ce De Se in } t > i Ls bOSse€ssion until such time as it is surrendered to the duly iU@lified Lxee)+ , : cutor or Administrator Of irs. effie Miller. he ‘his the 9th day of august, 1940, Je Ae Rousseau — Judze Presiding. Yo. 1116 State vs Paul Revere Plyler "y wm Yo, 1122 State vs Charlie Smith 0-32 soclation, SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TeRm Monday, August 9th, 19,8 j } ‘ j pul IN TH: SUPERIOR COURT 194.8 ASSAULT ON FEMAIE att The defendant enters a plea of gullty as charged, Judgement of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common Ja%l of [redell County for e period of EIGHT MONTI'S ana assigned to work under tha supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission. LARCENY The defendant throuvh hig attorney enters a plese of gullty to larceny of property less than 750.00 which plea the State accepts. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant he confined in the common Jeil of Iredell county for s period of SIX MONTHS and assivned to work under the supervision of the State Hizhway ane ’ublic orks Cermisston. This sentenced is suspended for a period of TWO YEARS on the following conditions; That the defendant occu: y himself at some zainful occupation anc not violate any of the laws ; that he not 4rink any subs'ance which contaty alchol and thet he pay the cost. DRIVING DRUNK The defendant arrested required to give a new November Term, 191,3. Ze Ve. Turlington, Trustee nz Trustee of the looresville I have recelved the followins items, all 1 the First ‘ooresville sg Jecember “acember "ecember Lecember Secember 1! Yecember 2, Acember ue cémber 24s tuary 2 vanuary ¢ “anuapy {2 van lary Jénuapy v8nuap Vv Jénuary v@nuary var dary : “© ary “Sbruar y 2 *bruapy 9 se ruary § “ebruapy 2] “erusry 2] “aroh 2 “EPeh “Argh “arch 17 “rch 2, apnty 2° Nationa lin, he * ‘eatr James Vrs, e H. sruce 3ruce T 1 Ve Ve Bruce Beatr ’ 1 Bank of Mooresvills, and Loan Association Olson ice Harris Valker + ‘Margaret E. ile Graw Vanderburg Va Mc nderbrug Brown Bruce Vanderburs Vanderburs ice Harris MPs. Billings Bruce Vanderburg T ve lie Wa lker Bruce Vanderburg J. ?rice caldwell “L111s Rhodes Bruce Vanderburg Beaver Vanderburg floyd bruce Bruce Je G. by J, Va nderburg [00k = This note is claired Ce Nantz and has been deposited in a Special account 515-32 Vanderburg 15.900 Bruce F, Pp, Gs &, Bruce Bruce Bruce Be aver 15.00 Surratt 300.00 Va Vanderburg 16°00 Vanderburg i nderburg 15.00 eVO a ety a Ses IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- AUGUST TERM, 198 Monday, August 9th, 198 Floyd s3eaver J. Price Caldwell in full Sale of Ollie C. Sloop house to Qllie C. Sloop and wife for $1978.30 ana less stamps for deed $2.20, County tax for 1942 and 19.2, ©433.47, and Town tax for 192 and school tay for 1942 $11.02, balance 1,92} 61 Bruce Vanderburg *“15.00 Ce He Surratt 300.99 ‘« P. Beaver 25.00 Bruce Vanderburg 16.0 Sale of adding machine to d, Thompson 60.00 T. Be Smith loan Bruce Vanderburg FP. P. Beaver TRiene ann h sruce vanaery — — IOr NM HLO ‘ nN NC e e Oe a | ue Ce Poston gyuce Vanderburg Bruce Vanderburg Bruce Vanderburg | EF - — fag ver fe . vancerbu ~ . © . w \N rn OO ON YIWN oO 7. © > ~NO nvAwy c o We nAantse enderbdburs naderhiure * tow 440 sean NORTH CAR On LNA DELL COUNTY TT IRE James He Thompson and Le Meely, Ire, trading ag the Statesville Insula- tion Company Plaintiffs Vs. Syllivan anc Mildred We TeS s, Sullivar Defendants This cause coming or be heard, te Smith, Clerk of the Superior to the Court that the matters ana between the pertiles and that the pla iff has its action; therefore, e taxed wi This 2 day of oe a treding as Noseco éWis Vachinery * 3, C eninery Supply Co. @ ir “> before the This cause coming on to be heard, end being heard befor 4e Smith, Clerk of the “uperior Court of Iredell County, Nort! eppearing to the court from the statement of the attorneys and the defendant that the metters and things in controversy between the parties and thet the ¢ ’ has elected to its action; It is therefore, ordered, edjudged and decreed th T+ fo h refo > ( ra ~ J r A > a ; is therefore, ordered, adjucged, and decreed that the Plaintige ; that the judem " juden at nonsuited and be texed with the costs to be charged by the Clerk, neretof ore entered in this cause on June 7, 1943 Ls fully peld, satisMied ica es . wey 21ée€Q na and r ; ¢ 07) y } mn This 2 day of August, 1938. cancelled, and that the sale of said property on July ie; 1 te ak cs 3 + ¥ rc 3 3 Co Ge. Smith firmed, and that the same is vol? and of no force and effect. a er of "Suderlor Court ar . . Clerk 6rlor Cour OF This the 2 day of Aug., Iredell County. onsented WO. 4513 nimy COUNTY City of Statesv Corporation. . o r ‘ 1 - tho undersigned Clerk of th hie udgment was entered in this plaintiff hec ‘or taxes due » what 5, except tr property . 1A orth in the answer of s4+° the manrer and sure and sale of the lené oe i wwe ye eee y servea with summons in sub ject to the sale of said land wes: ' nc irth prsering fi he defendar 9 t+ e+ .} ) * i Ann?r . ; f ' ; ; rea , o Piensa i . 19, at the Courthouse cov Y In —Cc 19 sPustee, 12 Ty, 195° ; * ‘ 3 ? ] ’ af x T tr ° was made to the Court on July 47» °*” ' aia ON ae U Db. Moss, ‘Pustee; Orporation, filed no snswer r, demurrer, or other pleading within sourt to make said sale; tir ele ™é Gllowed + ; ; hac that no confirmation of said s¢ ; "we Dy law and that the time within which the said defendants, nA taxes due thecit Defendant, Dorothy Bost, has paid the wife, Oliva L. Speaks; John A. Scott, Trustee, People's (ii ew VSuy OF . ns : ng Anwnbe + a ¢ on — Ne County of Iredell adjudged to be Liens oank; John A. Cutchins and C. D. Moss, Trustees; Grace 8 260 Seseribed tn “Urities Cop Upon the | roperty sald juigment, poration, might answer the complaint of the plaintiff has end the costs of this actions 5 FRONT ae: er oe ar a eg y } h defen 18 Count. expired; end it further appearing that the defendant, Lounty of Tredeli, has 3 f mht as tsed and 1a ich answer 3 filed an answer in which no issue was raised and that suc} answer did not sles to prevent the foreclosure sale of the property hereinafter Cescribed, put pe l-man , §.. y ” ay a a rayed the Court for ju ent against the property cescribed in the Comp etn: the lien of Iredell] declaring soOunty, for taxes due it, on said Property, to 7 3 = ee a. ee ’ 1h h he preserved ard to be f equal ai mity with the lien for texes It is therefore, upon motion of Barron K, irier, attorney for plaintiff, ordered, adjudged, md decreed that the the pleintifr, City of tatesville, has a first and prior lien, except that Iredell County has é li. of equal dlign'ty, upon the parcel or tract of real esta te hereinefter descr the: for taxes, together with interest, penalties ana costs, for the following years i in the followtr rount ¥ i i‘ é L iN F i ay PENAL 4040 TUTAL ‘ -OSTS — ' nie me ” 10.7 old v2 230 1941 15.42 oo7 22.59 ~ 2 / 195e 59 420 o1 43.61 1333 Zong iG 7.51 a ~/ 4 + a J = 193] 14% a a 16.12 1945 1! 05 2. 4 17.96 LY4 15.1 1. 3° 22 7 } Z9 l . iz a \ 15.91 133 12.83 % OR 15.91 192 12.82 z {98 15.9 i l ,o% 2 eo 2 14.55 191 10.01 0 12.42 ] 56 29 11.05 19); 2 7h 1 668 12.6 7 ; \ 13 7.16 5.31 1264? : 7. Z7 te Ts Sane 13,0 10.9 1.35 12.8) - ry 7" ik = £9 . 7 7 @ ~ Lee ee AL “TZI7. 16 > + . ar 8 torethey ith the costs of t ls action, ' Ls f int . YA eEKNAR S Bias ; ail E | defendant, . , ener orcered, adjudged, and decreed that the — nty TnaAea?? + ar . tk in the > y oj 4receil, has a ilen for taxes Gue tt in the smount set forth an » £47 q . Nan 8 : : . . . ; ty swer filled by sarc County of Iredell in this cause, uron the property hereinafter described. of ear ee ; tiff, city of eee ROSS» =O OQuel Gignity with thet of the plaint ’ : a? 3 yyeds » and that sete lien of the County of Iredell, is hereby prese r t} ted “hat the real estate upon which this judement is a lien is loca in Stetesv! le Toa, +a ° “ en tioulét vesville Towship, Ire jell County, North Cerolina, and is more pat 'escribed ag follows: Begirning at a stak : ga ic ee ‘ @ in the North mar Ying Avenue, § stake being situate South So ye » h margin of "inston nthe poitt : — = 2 Hest, 8 Cistance of 80 feet fro where the North ma W street 1 HC narg i , tn Aver ; hed , r intersect, and gn of “inston Avenue and the East margin of Fifth © r uth 8ho 15! minut running thence with the North margin of Winston Avenue, °° n Avenue: thence with” ro feet to e stake in the North margin of said wineinsft! ‘ . ven C Vv 1 ™ : i a 4 . nai’ referred to the Western line of an alley, shown on the plat her line of Lot lb = 5" Fast 100 feet to a Stake; thence with the Souther. as shown on the Pr Slock lh of the Statesville Development Company prom ; sos Seeate e hereinafter referred to, North 850 15! West 60 fee 5° 45" West 100 feet Sr vostern line of the I. T, Speals home place, off the Eastern eng of Lot 5 © the beginning, and being a lot of land coming ° ant Company Property, mg and 10 in Block 1h of the Statesville De veer ae 442 of Iredel1 County Registry. plat thereof recorded in Deed Book 15, 7U@ the pletrs, All the right, title end interest of the defendants, I, 7 ‘ a eo +e eocerks zank} John A. Cutchins and Ce. De Moss, Trustees; Grace Securities Corpora- tion, in and to seid real estate is hereby barred ana forever foreclosed, ’ except as to their right to participate in the distribution of any surplus that may result from the sele herein authorized, It is further ordered and adjudged thet Sorron K. Grier be and he is hereby appointed Commissioner to sell sric real estate at public auction for cash to the highest bidder, at the Courthouse docr in [Iredell County, after first posting notice of seid sale at the Courthouse in Iredell County, for thirty (430) days preceding sei sele, and elso advert! sing once a week for four successive weeks in some newspaper published tn Iredell County, end said Commissioner shall sell ssid reel estate free and cleer of all enc imbrances, and shall deliver a deed conveyinx said reel estate ir fee Simple to the rur- chaser. and the said Commissioner will, within three days efter said ssle, make report thereof to the Court. It 1s further ordered sana acfudged that from the proceecs of the sale the Comn'ssioner shall pay tothe plaintiff and to the defence t, County of Iredell, the amount of the texes, penalties, interest snd costs ad judwed to be a lien upon saic reel estate, and the costs of this action tncluéi compensation tot he Commissioner in the am sunt of 5% of thefurchese price of seid real] estate, anc shall na any surplus remaint: in is ha s into the vourt for Gistribution to the defen ants 2s their interests may eer. this cause is retained for further orcers. This the 2 day of August, 1946. 3e Ue Smith lerk of the cupertor Court r $b iedb bb ese dese secede deen sbtesese st $ m V. ts hereby permitted to take a voluntary nonsuit. wr we A rust 2 } oe IN THE SUPERIOR coupe This Aug 4, 19h Before the Clerk, Ce. G. Smt th Clerk of the Supertor Court a fredell County Brittain p hugene Ge Beaker ard ro} ° , partners, Trading and doing business 4 } 3 5 R ) | under the Firm name of Brittain Lumber § arth MIRE 1 eet noe — Company, ' - ; >) . f TAN "TTT — Plaintiffs, { NONSUIT Hi ————. ’ . A Vs 18] . y 0, de 4 a. Fred Le Stewart and wife, Mary P. eAmmty RATITWN: re mur , 7 Stewart, NORTH CAROLINA LN THE SUPERI COURT 1 befendantse | ‘ IREDELL COUNTY an f i omy } f } * Mh, ning h } aa } Piss : a a fb Prench i Wis This cause, coming on to be heard, and being heard before the under. George E. French, ie ‘ 7 3 } -f + < i we —— . i aie = TY 4 . r . fF ' siznec Clerk of the Superior Court of fredellcounty, North Cearolins, ard it Plaintiff § - Titer ‘ ! 5 — e evi , os A i sppesring to the satisfaction of the Court that the Defendants have setisfies VS6 J ] 4 - j in full the claims asserted by the Plaintiffs, and which constitute the basis Dr. Fe L. Stokes, 4 4 } : , Defendant of this ection: that by reason of this payment, the Plaintiffs desire to texe | e nonsult. This cause coming on to be hearc, ad vel DY efore t | | ' T Tr ’ WT) T , Yur ?. Yan } Cen? ’ m 4 . Ly . 3 7 z } “ mip ehend “+9 ( 9 SLU UINIEU, A DECHEED that the Plaintifs sonorable Car . Smith, Clerk of Superior ourt f iredel ntv, Nort are hereby permitted to take a voluntary honsuit. varolina, at the Auvust Term of the Iredell County ber lor yurt, ar it Zz Mis August lh, 193, eppearing to the Court from the stat: ment of the attorneys for the plaintirr ? Ce Ge Smith énc cefencant that the matters ana things In controversy have been settled Paune i. Clerk of the superior Court | vetween the nartfec na —— - a ar wry of Iredell County vetween the parties and that t:e plaintiff has elected to take « nonsuit i | i § / ily u - - th fe o t me ae + : 7.28 a : ‘ . ¢ ’ ‘| SP eR ote eet ee: shete ce bese bb lhie te sbibsesh ob dese se abso sede “nits action upon the payment to the plaintiff bv the efendant cf the sium 1 Jy i pa} I } td O. LSké aN | | . of Three Hundred Fifty end 10/100 Lollars (#35 lamages. and the edditton: / ae } . RT7TD > atm sum of Seva>r nN Dol): e (¢ 7 - ! as STG, _ IN THE SUPERIOR COUR! om Of seventeen Dollars (£17, J) court costs; sd ||) || J ee | { Th QVTyy rr 7 ‘ Treas + ® 7 : jets i 4 Li, shad YUN x + ; +h) ~ " eA j, para eA } y y+ fF a A amet Py - aie Before the Clerk + LS, lerefore, ordered, edjuceed ad cecreed that t plaintiff int 4 aT 4 bij ‘ € nonsulte tH : : = i , Hi Le ° noers, Trading are ioing busir ss " | ity neer the Fir rame a. i a7 + ie This +} ( ‘ > A } ‘ © Of hogers*Vinters eS UNO 7 Gay Of August, 195. Loe | ompany, | ‘ ‘ r £ ’ ’ - aE la | Plaintiffs, Ce Ge Smith ik i fea a " oh sr Con peed fi { Clerk Superlor Court, i a ' ; VU . ' [ sa Wetthon ota ? " ; én te a ' VSe NONSIVIT lredell Cou UV, e Ge 4 Lee ceammneeNanaeiaaee 4 , F Le &t + 3 , ; 1 0nsent nt ae red Le stewart and wife, wary P, onsented to: ; Pin * tewart, f Defendant gs, , eh Vy ooo Y, long T Mt opera et ie ““’orney for Pat; tirT ~~ wtf a " yer’ on to be heard, and being heard before the wi this C436, coming ‘lerk of the Supertop Court of Iredell ing Qn rT. 5 iti County, North Carolina, and it appee to the satisfaction of the Court ¢ clains as the het the Defendants have stisfied in full! ot ior Serted vo 18 the Plaintife, and which constituse the basis of thie! that by reason ¢ this Payment, the Plaintiff desires to take a nonsult. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERE 5 f ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Pleintlf orth carolina at “ tredell County 4 °9 ne T + Ww)? ‘eve ot < == = am > — > NORTH CAROLINA I HE SUPHRIOR EE, ww) ' COURT North Carolina, In the Superior 6ourt, IREDELL COUNTY Tan — = a Iredell County. Before the Clerk, —_ ies > Se er Pilar city of Statesville, 2 Imperial Dye & Products Co., Inc. municipal Corporation. Vse Plaintiff JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT We He Robinette, trading ar doting Vs. Business as Re < M, Products Co. Daisy Barnard and husband, Curtis Barnard; L. P. Somers; and the County ¢ Jredell. This cause, coming on to be heard and being heard before the under. Defendants signed Clerk of Superlor of Iredell County, North Carolina, ~ and it appearin: ee ee \ hr to the satisfaction of the Court that the defendant has satisfied in fu) the ‘ t t This cause coming on to be heara, and being heard before the claims asserted by the plaintiff, and which constitute the basis of this signed Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that ag « ) bm action: that by reason of this payment, the plaintiff desires to take & none un ection for the fameclosure of the lien sult. Bg? for taxes due the plaintirr upon real estate described in the Complaint, and it further appearing to the Court that It is, therefore, a@dered arf adjuiged and decreed that the plaints! Plaintiff, et the time of the institution of this action, filed e duly verified Complaint setting out the amount of its tax lien azainst said | real estate, ana with the costs of this action. & CT ra a ae now files a proper certificate showing the amount of taxes which are a lien or This the 22nd day of September, 193 Smith “we Superlor Court. said property, as authorized by Section 1719 (g) of Chapter 21 » Public Laws of 1939 as amended; ard it further appearing thet all of the defencants named in this action have been properly served with sumrons in the manner and within the time required by law and it further appearin; that the defendants, Daisy ernard and husband, Curtis Barnard; and L Somey i no Answer, F : femurrer, or other pleading within the lowed by 2 that t} ti a within which the said defencart s, Daisy Barnard and husband, Curtis Bernard; wee 1 anc Le *, Somers, might answer the complaint of the plaintiff has expired; oS oo % Nn ‘ . ’ , and {t further appearing that the defendant, County of Iredell, has filed an ' , ‘ answer in which no issue was raised and thet such answer did not seek to « - Prevent the fo oe ‘eclosure sale of the property hereinafter described but prayed +) a we C ¢ r 7 ourt for Jucgment against said property declaring the lien of [Iredell a9 i Cot , unty, for tax s due it on said property tobe preserved and to be of equal Fg Py = eee = > Olan ‘ “ty with the lien for taxes due the plaintiff ; it 1s therefore, upon motion of Barron K. Grier, attorney for the Plaintirs ordered, adjudged and decreed tat the plaintiff, city of Statesville, Se eee —— SS ha °4 first and prior lien, except that Iredell County has a lien of equal Glen alty, upon that psreel or tract of real estate hereinafter described for “Axe \ % together with interest, penalties and costs, for the following years an ¢ in the following amounts: PRINCIPAL INTEREST, PENALTIES, AND COSTS. 19.59 8.33 el 200 3.7) 21600 3.7 20025 8.5 2025 j 16.30 14-50 12.90 W4.50 14.50 15250 1%.5h ae 7 ~ wa e * 2 PON GoCe CORON ON 7 . o LO. SO + oF ] 2 cS 11.50 Oe31 9.259 Y > -~N ON + 2 NM Ws) Gor >. WO 4 coal ee @ rh SY ph pp ps * NON PR PNINNNN NWN OH]~ AOA) J NM OWA" this action. it 1s further ordered, adfudged, and decreed that the defendant, Cour; t4redell, has a lien for taxes due it in the amount set forth tin the answer County of Iredell in thts c’use, upon the property here inaét; dignity with that of th plaintiff, City of Statesville, of the County of Iredell, is hereby preserved. estate upon which this judgment is a lien is lxated Iredell On stake on the East side of Drake Street in States. Ss corners; thence with Cockrell's lihe S. 724 ast thence with said line 82 feet to a Spanish Oak Tree: thence with sald lien a westerly course 417 feet to Driv brake Street 110 feet to the beginning, containing three - 10r6 or less. le anc interest of the defendants, Daisy Barnard ve £e¢ Somers, in and to said real estate 1s hereby barred and fp f o + . Darred and forever Toreclosed, except as to their right to participete listributtion of any it is further Ordered '¢ : . = 4 is and adjudged that Barron K. Grier be and he IDI int q Jom yO - vanhvec Commissioner to sell said real estate at public euction for the hibhest bidder 4 4 *») at the Courthouse door in Llredell County, after 4 w . , +2rst posting notice of a vS OF said sale at the Cour house in Iredell County, f@ hints \ thirty (30) Jays orecedin, said e four sale, and also advertising once a week for! Successive weeks in some newspaper pudlished in Iredell County, and said ; { 7) omm’ ssioner shall s¢ll said real @state free and clear of all encumbrances namere She lien of such taxes and special assessments as are not a part of th Judgment, and shal} deliver a deed conveying sald real estate in fee simple % the purchaser, and the saiq Commissioner will ’ Jounty, North Carolina, and ts more particular? ev 9 , uthor.zt Surplus thet may result fromthe sale herein auth a ef lth within three days after sal made report thereof to the Court, It is further ordered and adjudged that from the procesds of the gale the Commissioner shall pay to the plaintirr and to the defendants, county of Iredell, the amount of the taxes, penalties, interest GHA sbste adjudged to be a lien upon said real estate, en the costs of this action, including compensation to the Commissloner in the amount of 57% price of said real estate, and shall pay any surplus remaining in his hands into the Court for distribution to the defendants ag the tr interest may appre An® this cause is retained for further orders, This the 25 day of Sept., 198. Ce Ge Smith of the purchase ar, Clerk of the ae Le Jacks, Plaintiff. Vs. JUDGMENT. P. Craven, Defendant, rf a “nas cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honor- able ¢, G, vmith, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel} County end it appearing to the court from thestatement of counsel that all matters of ‘ontroversy set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties: and that the plaintirr agrees to pay the cost of this action. Nop, therefore, by consent, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed “st 811 matters between the plaintiff and defendant are hereby compromised “nd settled and that the plaintiff is hereby tay with the cost. This 27 day of sept., 1943. Ce. G. Smith Clerk of the Superior Court On sent ; Je Re Bur > 8s Mtomey 7 or ain le Fe Craven CTU genie Mesh stsese Sais Shee hsp tees 5 Superfor Court CAR OT INA BILTMORE Corporation doting business Plaintiff business as *@ coming the defencan action on the aie’ rt = FRONT pearing to the specific property, to-wlt that ancillary +} llary to t ction the plaintiff caused to be issued Celivery property, and th: possession; plaintifs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT to be heard before the Honorable ©, g Smith e v a “) Ly 7 ‘ Std ~ o +redell County, by motion of the Plaintiff foy by default final; the Court that a verified complaint was filed 9th day of “uly, 19)3} ppearing to the Court that said sum™ions, together were served on the defencant the 10th aay of we pearin to the Court that no answer, CGemurrer or Dy the defeniant and no extension of tire to ft): that the time within which pleadings may be fourt from the verified complaint and cla ims the riwsht to the nossess ton of Sream Cabinet » one Frigidetre Ince 92 YON 295 and Compressor No. 93 F. 295, ant ‘laim and reunder now has the same in its airel! that the plaiz'-- RNERED. AN.Trmen awn nereee be ead » ADJUDGED AND CREEP, i entithb d to the possession of gs: 1a property, anc te “efendant the costs of this action. Cay . wer tambh > a of eptem er, 1 Ws. Ce Ge Smith ; CLERK SUPERIOR OU, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTE "lth the llen for NO« 1,560 WORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR coup? x SNAU: WUT IREDELL COUNTY city of Statesville, a j municipal Corparation. Plaintiff VSe T, Ae Coley; widower of Minnie J. FUDGMENT Coley; Albert Coley and wife, Helen C. Coley; James Coley and wife, Brownlie Be. Coley; Roy Coley 4 and wife, kmma Coley; French Coley and wife, Elva 4b, Coley; Annie Lee $ Bennett and husband, Roger Bennett; and the County of itredell. De fencants ame —<— mM, 4 ) »OMm ‘ } Thisc aise coming on to be hear } signed Clerk of the Suverior Court, a: = cf 3 ~+ + {ls an action for tne foreclosure of the lien f real estate described in the sOmpBint, and it hat Plain that Plaintiff, at the time of the tnstitutton of tht verified Com latint +4 1 VOris c UOom i fT se nN, Ov tha AMAIN+t Ant Sbrea o o e out the amount of its tax lien avainst said real éstate, and now fi} ¥veUGaL a. TOW Qe ¢ Nr or , Ping ’ raha “ proper certificate showin: the amount of taxe s which &re &@ lien or ~ v lien on said px >perty, as authorized by Section 1719 (,:) of syhapter 4] hapter 9 Public Lai f : tc Laws of 1939 as amended; and it further appearing that all of t he 4 defenda ned ms named in this action have been properly served with summons tin the manner and within sn the time reqired by law and tt further appearing that the defen jan m A ~ nvants, T. A, Coley, “idower of !inrie J, Coley, Alvdert Coley and wife, Helen se Colev: Ja; ” af , ° vs “ames Coley and wife, Brownie 3. Coley; Roy Coley and wife, 2 imma D Co ° si * Coley; French Coley and wife, LYa 3. Coley; and Annie Lee Bennett énd husband ne R » 1 “We NOger Benrett, filled no answer, demurrer, or other pleading Within th @ time allowed by law and that the time within which the scala Cefendants, mn rr oT ‘ es ; le Ae Coley, Widower of Minnie J. Coley; Albert Coley ard wife, Mics o uf ve Cole * d rr 5 r * ys James Coley and wife, Brownie B. Coley; Koy Coley and wife, ' —— nch Coley and wife, Elva 8. Coley; Annie Iee Bennett and ee ws ly Rog ; » Noger Bennett, might answer the compleint of the plaintiff has Q) » % nd it further appearing that the defendant, County of lredell has 1 a nag itt Bere &answe ; r in which no issue was raised and that such answer dié not S¢k to pp , I eV vent fhe foreclosure sale of the property hereinafter described " the com Plaint but prayed judgment declaring the lien of Iredell County, sur taxes ay 48 lt on sata property, to be preserved and be of equal dignity taxes due the plaintiff; 7 ‘ | f ih " v | | i Ni — Ft ™, Y v) 4 y # — 1 r J. ia i _— ; “he hie ad — caf th a — i t 4 ; pay ct ' > ey Had It is therefore, upon motion of Barron K, Grier, attorney for ty he plaintiff, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, City of States, has a first and prior lien, except that Iredel} County has a lien of equa] Aignity, upon that psrcel or tract of real estate hereinafter Cescri ibed fon texes, together with interest, penalties and costs, for the following years and in the following amounts: aie PPT NOTPAL INTERFST, PENALTIES, TOTAL AND COSTS. }z2 $16.80 S773 32h, 53 1922 13,80 6 Hy "20 hh 193); 12 ) 6.58 16, 5 1925 W.S0 farpie’ 21.68 1°2¢ 1.50 7.18 21.68 1937 12,50 6.9h 20 Li); 19%, 13.5¢ 6.5 20 sll 197 13.50 6.9) 20k) 13 1.50 6.16 17.96 151 13.76 7.00 20,75 192 ele 4.85 ©.97 193 r¢ 62 6.25 16.87 Wik 10.00 6.00 16.00 19h5 25 2.19 10-94 Lol 3.75 1.66 10.41 194.7 10.72 1.24, 11.95 TO TAI $- 93,08 toyether with the costs of this action. At sg iw ther ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant, ounty of Iredell, has a lien for texes due it in the amount set forth Ir the br the said County of Iredell in this cause, upon the property . at hereinafter descrit ed, of equal dignity with that the of the pleintiff, city af oteatesville, and that said lf That the real estate upon which this fucgment is a lien tis locate wy } *Ownsh ‘ yang and being in the city of Stat esville, Iredell County, Nort? Olina and being lots 5, 6, 11 and 12 in Block 62 of the Statesville Devel © company property 2s shown upon &@ plat thereof recorded in book 15 8 f¥% of the Dead Pecords for Lrede]} County, e All the right, title ana interest of the defencants, T. A- coleyi v on wer * wf nt T ‘el ~ rn . Colej “icower of “innie J. Coley; albert soley and wife, Helen C. Coley; “ams » ena wife, Brownie 3. Coley; Roy Coley and wife, Emma D. @oley; French Coley and Elva B. Colev: n anc wife, Elva 3, Coley; Annie Lee Bennett and husband, Roger Bennett, it to said real ea + tel ~ estate 1s hereby barred anc forever forclosed, except as t° right to participate in the distribution of any surpbus that may result ft the sale herein authorized, = {s tt 1s further ordered an d he ® d adjudged that Barron K. Grier be 4” hereby appointed Commissioner . to sell saié real estate at pudlic auction cash to the ht. _ 5+18 st bldder, at the Courthouse door in Iredell County, first posting no tice of said sale at the Courthouse in Iredell County, f% nN + nr TTecs en cf the County of Iredell, is hereby presé ° ~ hd ~ 3 -~n tieuler} ship, Iredell Ounty, North Curoliha, and is more parts Mtlee ag by lew requ thirty (30 days preceding saic sale, and also advertising once a week for four successive weeks in some newspaper published in tredell County «3 said Commissioner shall sell said real estate free an clear and except the lien of such taxes &nd spectal assessments es are not a@ part of this judgment, and shall deliver a deed conveying said real estate in fee simple to the purchaser, subject, however to the lien of any special assesse ments which ere now 4 lien on said property. And the suiec sommissioner will, within three cays after said sale, mace report thereof to the Court. It 1s further ordered ari ad Judged that from the proceeds of the sale the Commissioner shall pay to the plaintiff anc to the defendants, County of Iredell, the amount of the taxes, penalties, interest and costs adjudged to be @ lien upon said real estate, and the costs of this action, including compensation to the Commissioner in the amount of 5% of the pr ircha se price of salc real estate, and shall pay any surplus remaining tn his hes into the Court for distribution to the Gefendants as their 1 And this cause is retained for further orders, This the 27 cay of sept., 19h8. ye TF, Smith atone of the Superflor court t eRe se le hsb le sice ce sble sess NORTH CAROLINA ST LVWawen , ALAMANCE COUN TY Nancy Elizabeth Baker, Plaintirfr )t Vs. } es) jo “erlie Lewis Baker, Defendant, j This cause coming on to be hesrd in chambers before His Honor, #0 Carr, Restdent Judge for the Tenth Judicial District of the % North Carol ina, uperior Court upon the complaint of theplaintiff for separate maintenance and support; And it appearing to the court that this 1s an action for separate mad ntenance and Support, and it further appearing to the court from the Verified complaint, that theplaintiff is entitled to the relief cemanded, =e further appearing to the court that the defendant has had five days ilred; IT IS NOW ORDERED that the defendant pay in the office of the Clerk *f Superton n Court each week the sum of $20.00 for the use of the plaihtiff, of all encumbraces nterest mav appear, and that the first payment be due on Monday the 16th day or August 1943 ’ » ang No. 455e a similiar payment being due and payable each monday thereafter qu; “NG the orth Carolina In the Suverior Court pendency of this action, and that the defendant further pay in the office ot Iredell County Ratase ¢ I of the Clerk of Superior Court, for thefse of A. M. Carroll, plaintirr's ett, ney, — . L.PSe the sum of $1 0.00. of W. Lucille Miller, administratriz ” } me) T * Cc, Miller, and Paul B,. Plaintiitits This 7th day of August, 1913. ; VS. LEO CARR RESIDENT Lee MeLain and wife, Eula I.cLain Nan GE JUDICIAL Distr CT ——— Seal or. This 1s to certify that the foregoing 1s a true copy of the ort of Superior court of Ire gine), oe Ysera ad 7 i - : tne a tit ~ by recorded in MINUTE TOCKET 22, Page 21), in the Superior Court... 45 an a ree oe Guthrie ATL Dw STITT ‘ ~ QT CLERK SU ‘ wag) bem / office of Clerk Superlor Court, om Lo ! a +e , = | OE TERETE OTE Hee ERE ETE ETE TE TENE TE SE ese He ESE FRONT > | | sf = vs en tC ie. rs Carolina County en ae ter ee eet TY _t } vU.sUi : } an nt , 7. L. ad , f to the court from the state..ent of counsel that = Ms > } 77 J and +h s i a . + ar ] C } " i at romised, u and settled all matters and tni H ‘, i ~ ™ . . ) Baa therefore consent, it is ordered, action In the Superior Court Before the tae ny Clerk ®ANNT TH ORT! UAilUdt lees ~ oT mNT Tere iw bb idad at wy : be heard and being heard before the Honors’: Vs | } of Iredell County, and it aprecrin Sanks Smoot and the j arties hereto have cor- lefendiuuts | s between them; } ad judged, and decreed his cause comins on a ; ; a aAefendant bh Nad iif qgeilenaant oe ee Laintiffs erefore, Snel on “GSUUITI wit ense. Mae 3 1 PAnAal 2 ual dioni+. ‘ Stl LT y 4 ~1LG ; upon that lor + u axes years and 4 +} in the following reserved unon motion of except “» FOrether with interest, nounts penalties, Barror 1 decreed that th ind co: iat Iredel] parcel or tract of rea] estat +o US. jounty nas hereinafter described for the following rae oe 8M syecia the lien of such taxes or 4 1 e “ry ‘ i at r> © 2 deed a ver Sup er, o urchas to the Hat Da ¢ © Oe. ‘ . fter af avVS yo ire three da hin S + @® dq = ~ nm n 7 ® cH n ro nn -4 cs = CO UNTO Cc ww x ie @. 0 « % O MARI A < Vaasa 9 FF NOW;] -OO MO -~2 ee ee « ™ ™ \ L i Aad « ler ordered Purt) 1 It t vv shall y oner +4 c IO U2 om! sale the +> Co Two C wo C¢ | iount NY 4 17 + a+y Trede a Ot Vs Mm moo « « wW OO e e ¢ oe ww O 4 ry) ? o ”~ 2 o SS a oO ~ i = S S a oO 4 “4 1 —_ ~ So c < oO 2 3 G4 S a ® @ D os nS Q ? °o oO ¢ » © c SO AC C > e+. 2 ek ee D ULNLNLA LN eS tw rc HOC s+ © = + 8-6 @© € *# wa ot tM i uy ce ao 6 +O * © © & { pa t i 5 ee aaa . - 4 - +> Be «> 5 $4 a> ‘ ‘ i 2 ° +> + ‘ 4 S4 © 4 ba .S) b c “ Bs +A ) ~ q@ Oy < G4 c $4 . G4 Qo @® oO a) 4 . Su dA g cH = SS , > 1 r vw) 4 . 4 : oO . w”~ v rt oo) ‘ et S » © Q cs C S : ¢ G4 @ t “A oO ba co o* ~ 2 4 3 > S qt + s& { G4 3 > ’ « Ss . ay = Cc) i ~ “~ 4 . Sa 4 ie r “rt © S$ ° ‘ 4 oe st i : + 4% <3 42 © « > > - “3 ao ogo Seer’ he Sava oO ws. ®D -4 liege 3 » > o — COssScaroao WH ODM DDO “hk. o > VD 4 ” © Seded a4 -rd oO fr] ker re -< OG A MO & pp S& Orr Sa. = a oOo Ww = «ft Ta a 7? ¢ 4 m4 O £F4.\0 t, <@) Aafendnar aqerendaan + [2 forever forclo: resul 3 ey ea Grier b + ks s . = - by S 3 ° oy fy > a Y A n at UveY ljoor in Iredell County, c se thou Y i = the ount Tredell C in $6 ourthou: ’ 4 m4 ~ ¢ Aa red) $ be © C4 week adverti 1lso = a a ee “= zs > Selita a Se z nn —~ = — a ~ PRS eae <a: ee ee .— sing once a i) »Y ~~ ( 4 ) v2 ¢ » ~ 2 Oo oO e t 2 c> ounty, n vv hed in Iredell Sa 4 ee ~ “ a oO —4 @ vr nees, &*" a lear of all encumbr e ait thie an am lll 7 ¢ 4 coer eet ab et oe = ess ts Se ses = : <P 2 -— - a ——— ee a te << e Se ee 4 rm ome | eae hnsiciliheescnsliiaamestinenicaetlinn 4 ) \ Novembs - ‘ b . — c cH —t - - 1 . a by 4 $4 ‘ ty 4 4 { “4 - Oo nd pee ee pg Pe pt ° . ° : . f , . J a . 77 Li c 3 ( rea urned . T e work under Jor} Lic 4 + 4 ' , + * ~ —— a ee pe IN THE SUPERIOR COURT - NOVEMBER Turki, 1948 : ee ee ee ee Monday, November Cth, 1loxLé SIP = nam ot S euisainteh ana ase oe a ee ee ee aes = c ey i ’ + onod A tf Le : j ar any Liw wt ik A > W . ATI 3 ; ou V tit e defendant to carry out aly os EE ps rer in condi As ‘, ° . % 2, oo: n! ot ion Y- it ; Wr! v and ul lic orks ‘onmmission. t 1s ur Be 2U10N ’ : Las ang vO 1 vue 0 i 7 0e , ; canta nr La WeWeN ? . * 4 ~y ' CATIA ing ie Ol 5 execs it entence 1S su: pen ed ior on he f Llowin; ACitor to nut theort a. nbanke Laue o LS § 1 ) it theprison sentence into -Ondition « 114] (hat he not operate a motor vehicle upon the highways of wT fea tunis State for a period of OJ/L { * that he surrender his 1s ‘ i Poe ; Sg . : ’ iad 4 | lefendant enters » of ilt license to the Clerk Superior Court so that it can be sent to ws a . Ui ye {nto } Pps .oae , ; j el u ent of +t} een oe the officers at Raleigh and be properly revoked; that he not r ; 6 - 7 lrink any substance containing alahol; that he pay a fime of 100. and the cost; that he pay 375. of said cost and fine now, / and have until the 10th of Jan. 191.9, to pay the remainder. for, tie - he Court is that the defendant pay ° ( . : the Court 341.00 to oy fy cetiiher; that she have until January 10, — oe id cost in this case and in cas mur AIITT Usdil s' Court. ) Cc, 1 4,0 = 23 O ots A . so & + - _ Se a ne ” x ' 4 4 a. o SS nod ~ he 4 a . ee : aa 8 | ,° $9 23883 2 2 § OC 7 ~ : S&S a i= S 7. = , “ b a 7 : . is O ® i = 3 & Sit 8 : su ee 3° ©3360 ts, - m4 ; 4 HO = _ hi id ¢ _ > > Op O- IN sd: ‘oO xaur'x ~As 3 Vew in the OY llowing licitor 7s Tues e 7 ‘ ‘TR ° LOd <c, senehemeenmemtces sel ahiitania = ? s : — inengasibeaieaianes scanetianatinninesiacs scniniact cma c eo oO oa oie ¢ ao w “A ”~ < co = e » S ol ° “~ @ ? . > : : : > — = > : a q E + — > ae ? st mfe € 4 = : es ¢£ eo «as — - 2-H SS bf 4 ce si © -r GS on Ah Oa ee : mY s, t — 2 | On ¢ @ 1° 2» o = 893 we |b | oe @ mM : aL | “dA tOG4 4 © = fed LO Ot ae 4 10 0 » os Shea \§ 3 Ce A rr G4 1 oO so Mn a. She ol¢ i oD oO = 1G 5 : | VY oe ° 5 =f Cp @ +) G4 vox SH : EH | C ; c | me od ers : rt ¢ | | a = © oO ee, SD -~ » aoe — & c c y | | 5 Es O Or 4 0) af A a + ~ | | re ‘ ctor > : ,fSH Me » ery a Ms so ‘dA Sed 64rd a | | > x Sy 4 C o ‘ H.. © QO ¢ oe ae | | | fa 520 t4 0 eo | mos 4% O . a | c.O0 oi * = . 4 ' j Ss > piss dertOyp « ! ~ a S © Owe = | near x § < Syed a po ~ + = , ; 34 { 1-7 r > + : : ig a . af ! , fA f-} > .. q@ ‘ 4 3 O : t i. 33 c | -_- 5 £, 3 : =e > £, ~ | ' Hi Ss o Sea £490 is >” ae | = ¢ ae { ¢ . { ; E 1 : , cs «3 | SS et € ao O us et ~4 a ‘ oO r Be tS é ae / , anes: d SE g , - a - é « ~~ i 7 - € a EE penile z iMiimmi——-.. <= —— SS a a ie a ednesday l.orning, Ary rk ) ‘4 4 UU BER = ulred ’ r * until or Tay z Ye al TS I WV i} lovember nr We YD > > : tO : . - 4 & ~— ie =) v _ ; e of | a = » 2 Q Oo a So = es apd or] ay 7 4 ) 4 ‘ ~ cae o 2 ~ oO ¢ : ice oO Oo G4 e oe r . O34 ~~ oOo Ff @ . “P= E+ S Gy A = OFO a a ff mM oO : © _ < 3 : a 7 } a4 oO Ule xecu 1 = r ; also in oO ? recess a 3 Oo @ ry f tom ‘ nl ¢ 5S 1 Q + r ® > ® > - ) = os do § ‘ 2 ti =& ~ . 3 re o - 1 . 7 ° © . SS o a o { B — *S s 3 an 2 © — “) 4 7 ’ PF co ~ @ 2 + o ao no = 2 om" & “d S © rs. ‘ r ” = u 2 3 HE4 ~ = 3 oO © 3 ‘ > ts - Qs a a ae 2 , ¢ mk ON © ° e 4 si o & 4 c » — is oO m ot a Y “ct ~ ~ a ae Sy fy ee pod 2 s ) ; . « mr oO 139) » oO ) : oO ‘_* 2. et et 2 ; > © A - - ££ ¢ 2 « 4 - - t— od cf { @ Q ® = a - 3 ri ° o CS a a 4 { s » ~ es} ~~ oe a = ! ‘ os oo — oe a) 4 & i © A, > ww @ as aed 4 oO ot — AJ SU + & © 3 _> . ome oO Ty — Sa = of SG SH 3 © ~ 1 ~ = ei 7 = oO x i . _ oS s em Ga ap oO 3 ’ ~’ 2 ° “dt . s as ~ ; ; O ’ 6 oo ha Q a : + no So bt < 2 a: oe ” 5: ek eg © : “ a =. 2. 2. Sf. = = 3 © a : : ’ te =— = a a= = ‘ ; 4 , 2 8 u + > + | eats a . 3 => Ss 4> a $ > + ; ‘ bang Oo | i ae > | ¥ °o : ss ¢ 4 < 4 > 4 < —4 s oO ‘ { c> ® : 2 Sa © ce e © S ® ) ) } : : | | | | t 2 $4 rca) ; } + s : _ . 2 | — = = ot } f | Re \ 4 ® .—o oj . ‘ i +} “7 3 ~ ei —t | | 3 4 ON | | ' j ; | a G4 ms ¢ | | l ) i | ; Ol C t } i t 4 “ 4d “ -t | ) : | ws a SS : : . 2 = aie | = D S : : ae ty | b, : a ae 8 a Se r . | j oO er |} of - |] , of & Sy # Gd o < ~~ - r > ' ' > 3 | j ‘ » « o Sf im j . | m4 | +| ° ° 7 cr 4 E> . . ‘| { > - ' is © . a _— | eS ' ‘ - rp < ' ‘ - ; ! 4 ¢ = j . 4 . orf : ‘| . = 1 - ~ n~ f | 4 © 4 w& > 4 ”~ oO I OU i e r - 2 Oo +S § 4 + ; a 4 t S47 q i i oF oe) > . Cc » 241 0 sl Ue t= ~~ c > - rt o . 4 es « ao — cr on a - - a cfd > 4 : ” = o 4 - ° « 2 ek . V . oO ro i + 2 a ° ~~ = ! i yy "S Honora a ee ee ee »le Court convenes according to adjournment ’ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THA ArT “y 77 1 ~aryT KF WN TYE stip patra: “TT FIRST WERK == MOV BZA Tome, Loe ae NOVEMBER reeeee if i + nor ’ TY AT(A\Y% nor ”v Mormar: sn, ic ae yes 10th 194 FIRST Woon NOV BER 1 uru 194.8 “wednesday No. lli« State vs °° 2 o ‘rosby vornelius vs i Uive / Ny. 1) 5M A Wve #6 state — atta 117 “ -~) is ] 5 IC LEY ul eS O Lea to the Vs ° , i } Q the soo 76 y Lueille Rhinehart Y y ; x I STS) } hs » 2 : Y C r he abe athe + 4 -v er Ve 4 + : ,y ; f it wit irder, 1 it ' ~ Y Y jefe nt ai i 4 f } I I = ACLE ‘ a the = 1 ES VV <— <> << ae wednesday, November LOth, 19,8 MUEAKING., ENTER] Ny m1. he 4 ine agerend: <— a ee ee lury : coe abs 5U ty CWA pyr any > , a Jury “worn and a Ianel Led . ‘wate 5 +o. y } - 4 + aU + ral : wd oe t } con - 4 MoU 1 OY vv ~~ } orc , » ; = “ F 1€ consent of ' t 3 nin le det t N dana pt , a eu ) 4.Uit at a he ,Y + . { the jury return r f 4 ’ . } Lie a 1G E 4 ur T { eonfinad ae P conilined nh one tate's Pris j > ; 1 4th 3 ve'S Frrison I ; . , . : . 4 ~ A 4s be an uwullnil nors Ore in a nan ‘ i ' : upon tne cori : i \ + . + + : ii oOo & 1Side I ‘ it : a4 ° ‘a ADEa e t 1 y a ae } Y) F ALU i il€ - > . + , * / ii t+43re : 7 z 2" 1O0UL ice 1 e , ~ ' 1 A Lc e a ; ] j ~ a . 4 a l I i ‘ e 4 e Y Y QY y ; . * I ea i ° 4 i 3 , at “ ~ . : Pa ° ; a in the co Hh 3842 Of i 1 Sounty for a period ol ~ w . , »’ » + oa 34 I IFTE ; S assicn tO wo unaqer tv Su} rvision a c ; i Sree ; } D . alee ’ y ‘ ad " . «o of the State Highway and Public Jorks Commission. 1.18 + I i sentence is suspended for TWO YUARS on condition that ne not violate any of the laws of t.is State, that ie pursue some gainful occupation, be of good behavior towards all neople, and that he pay into the oifice of the Clerk of Superior Court by January 10, 1949 the sum of *200.00 for the use and benefit of Bill Gant for injuries sustained by him and one-half the cost of this action. - rT mn PE Litw » OC i\ aN Myr. aATrre.s Lilio SUP “TAT ate we NU LN IOR COU WORRY rl > L 1 m i rr V od DD rior 194.8 ee nr av mre ’ ashe AIT? 1 su da SUPERIC de Ji COURT oo inesday, November 10th, loye NOV ER : 3 ay, November 15, 19,46 255 AULT WITH BEADLY WEAPON i nters a plea fF not mite. NOI ent. Narges ie en.panelled, " IREDELL COUNTY, Novexber Term, 194 ) GQ 74 ‘ 4 . 2 urin,; tne tras defen cin we eo 4 ead we Dode OL 2recol ' f @ “* ' co oO b ~e c = 3 Be S : 3 - t ' ~ } a c > om + } + 1 «A Uisle ‘ant tenders . 7 . : 5 ; ls DLea of a " : 1 — 4 ‘ ’ ny ee ’ f 2G ; Ol sO Sault wee JOE dly weapon, wnicn ] + ° 4 * nO } t+ Rony 72 CCE t p@ ae Ue YUU ae '6 onorapd © 4 urt Conve on Corain t + >) ‘ aw + we 4 oS + s 1 ’ 13) - y+ sf + ¢ ds i 7 a Ju nt of: tue Court is that the def nm . roe Jail of Iredell County or en : . u : assiened to work unde r ) ? 4 perlod of > JIWL FLO {oOd ed , W n a 3 tne uD s : e bi ee ) 14 on ws ‘ ' — Hebway and Pubhis Warde Baantccian oe idee Presiding, and Holding Courts of this the Fifteenth Judicial dist; bb LW! AN su aC WOPrKS vommlLSsSion, a, sagaae! JUUEY A ~ tas - Pict, ae a 4101S sentence ; aSpenaed for iO Y ARS on the following “ veaee Eg ‘his ; a a * 4 . - me ee OSE ONQitilons: 7) m 4] rent 4 na pr l 16 no fi0oLlate hy ol t eae aUNS) Fall L6Tm, +749 ‘ 7 5 a ga d . © saws Lt CllLS state. t L in sverage containing alcohol: thas Asians wine ; a : a j 0? » ¢ motor ve ta eukun a ss _™ 9 VAlAU Je vos we to 14ULLLOUOrsy sbbeas i aca ok ae a2 1le@iL unt rn: £ ae . i - wsOUO . ALU LC U I ULiIL© Wavs P ee . - e ” #s a i i iS ji ny S of t, - " " gaa ree es he : : f this Stet \ 4 ‘ tt Vin 4 Los; that ne urrende Ao ee o : ms 1 - oar . surrender umn 4 ) e followin ood an iwful n vs Dakine tind se nile See ’ VWrt alae vOUrI , KreOS rece + ’ eww ww until lMionday l.orning, . as ved separate anda ; he plaintiff and tiie defendant apart }- < X * fo < @ ct ae Zh M4 ges rr iy Pro. i ¢, hi Tom each n+} encement of this action? two years preceeding the coi > a ae , * S : ~ ‘ . 1 L ) C4 - If © 4 " r ; { : WH ° 4 < ad TUN ; : eMOe oy 2 a © > : 3 J « ; af4s, : a > a ~~ be q@ _ Ss 4 cS o = “i . = { 0 HOO - Se 4 a + Spi Mee C . “~ wen & = - At 4 — © O 2 { . — > a ¢ 4 : A1> ma ‘ es ‘ 5 ; : oO ited _ 4 4 4 sell ° ” > jam Ss 3 : 4 { 4 2 = i ) rt ws °o > «ed > : 4 MoM oO rans “~ “ a4 > > - e @ . 4 a4 a t) = ~ bu : . ) aa ; p> ~J { . a : : 4 == Co a S D + * 4 ‘ 4 es Hu ae. eee 32 2 : 5 Oc = “2 7 o > ° i oO C » r a | =o Oo ; — ary i ; ses ‘ © a > ? $ { ) , : m4 + VF gs = =e a ) Sc. c = . ; > w ® 3 - * a 4 —- F 4 > * \ — 2 ) ~ ) ) 9) x e> . ‘ e : , “ a nie “v Hi ao on Hinshaw 9) I laintiftf o © 2 s . @ 4 e 7 > = . . ; : CO — & © E . ‘ ® ro} fn] : ? ; 2 . a ; = ia “ 3 ° ‘ ; i 4 GS @ ° > fa ; _f ‘ : cA : a ? > ) , ; : 2 > | oY rd D = ° G4 D $ i se a ® > oO 7 @ > > . i —: 4 cA c> Sc ‘ ; : ss 42 4 st & a S So +> +> > 4 ‘ ; i oO S wae! S 5 S $ ; : nd $4 3 2 = = wi F 5 © 4 : cs ; i ; +> = oy t tot > 3 : : ‘ @ ; + bog : i iredell n c D Oo ey . c ~*~ + “A : ‘ ‘ 3 > oe) © ) _aA8 bYVUOCOCd o rior Court } au, ’ , v0U Urry AInts eS . ; . V+ Lintiff and i a rfe vlONn,. 7 i r or } i) ¢ ~ ty _— . - 2 wan + “ - a ' ’ + = “ri 2. > 2 ~ S 1 ols O cd ~ : ° : a fo . ‘ p >. 4 = ; ; . c e ) < ~ . 4 4 4 G4 WM er > Ee = “=, he — ° Oo - ong $ eld ¢ ' , CJ “ o 5 s + 4 “ . 4 ’ : S H.. = fe) “ $4 wy ’ : = > 4 = _ O Oo 2. @ 2 eo} by g Oo $ 3 wo «> > ) a ay Ps ry m4 r> ch oO + nO ¢ oO q ; 3 ) ’ - ; Ow 7+“ ra ~ 4 a4 3 — 4 C di © Sint " = qa - bo ) re i oO C4 c = ; = a c wn - -~ ry ¢ @) ¢ 4 t 42 { $4 aw o . ec “A ) 4 me £400 hy by 4 42 ? ) ‘ ; 4) +> EH oO @ 5 rap sy : aa > { > : c.f - . fc, E+ ON — &) . ae § S i i = S a 7 ’ 4 2 a oO : oH ) 3 = c AY O co Q &% 8 O ¢ Ct | ‘ Oma 3 © = © 4 3 o FQ UN a ) uD » ) ! ‘ C os tm es > Po O32 — h = ‘ 4 : or ct =} a 4 -4 j Oo ! HS & cS ee . | . moo 7 . + 2 Bt. SJ eo Q) rh - 2 | k= Q d . S @ ae § @ o ' 7 — i ® > a ¢ rn) - oir ° = ont | 3 > o 2 O 3 cf 4 ; 4 r. a 4 + ~ a 85 a + r dD 4 4 = f=] > 4 ; falda ¢ ‘ _ 4 4 — ° ; we “~ U aa Ha" > O 4 n ° ‘ ‘ liond: ~ UU Seana sib Ses Fes COURT ~ it UPERIC ‘ 2 wre t 3 ~ Sag J wahads _> “~ i s. ai e po 7 = yin a | — O) © eas t= yo — ne Jo l> s a5 < 7 os = a = © - es rT) a on — “ ~~ rH, 19 Lo ’ er em! 10OV nr 4 YW Mond: an r® -e yo! NO« 4 = @ # f. ¢ 4 = -y a ; + 4 ‘ ynarpe oharpe = * cS = - n > i EB) _ SS 3 os oO ba 2 3 Oo ci 4 ~ Ns re ee t ~ bei -< ~~ 9 r 2 ma © ~~ Cc). © r+ = — e a . > ; “> > a4 Q o “4 7 . ‘ « « ° ° +e ,»ion - u Ee] 4 c o + 4 int aes AB Se a gaelelue ind e livorce . intait - ~ S SS nH @ e ¢ C4 ) “4 . . rin ny 10 A) he taxe¥y action is hereby, © ta | ’ ANG oO } { f 4 . lissolved, and the plaintif , J rbyuy } Yt ng Presidd Le ihousseau ————_— tT) s 8 . ua fre é J t ir i Judre »residin orce from the defendant. } div Solute ) TO aah iihdieee ee i ‘ > — $4 > Ov. > rt 9) cf . - “dd 4 ‘ . . c . . | c ~~ e 0a £+ Or | ~ rc & “ # ee ° 4 ‘ e> a = 4 > ; | : e uN . a4 i. =, et - © ” QV 2 - © Fits & 5 : eHO § M4 # @ # A 4 P * I= Q . 42 sy = t 3 Ww C r . - - o . —- | @ = oO C4 Q) Gs rs > - mo Otis 3 Ee : ee ra oO » Q mes “ 4 hy : . -— cS + cif a“ “4 co t. ~ : of rf eo CG ‘ . } ee a >_< es oe aes = We Pe es me ee oem rH ae) @ r - O = & r Oo a C4 ) oO c . : 2 ry a4 = 2 4 ay i oy aa : > = ¢ ‘ Oo © = + ca © . a j ) G4 © “A > a 4 GH hy S rd) : . “A cS E i Se © ’ S a 3 “A @ “4 . ) os Be | —> : ce n ) m9 ) } 2 ? ; m& ea $ a a : { > he sa > : o S | . <S oO : oO od > © “© ‘ Ss — ‘ ‘ ‘ > 4 ‘ ss > ; ‘ $5 4 3 5 bs ! : H S ® { 7 >= co »- rd ; - 2 ‘ 2 S 3 @ ‘ ~ : 3 av aA 4 3 > cS oO a . _~ oe 35 a r ® oO - ep $ 4 : e : “ en } = - tt FF be P > 2 ce <s ‘ ~_s ae * a4 Oo wo 2) ‘ , -~ 4 © ) ‘ a) =~ ~ { > ‘ . ” gO a a ; ; ~ . . : 2 — ) pst —_ 9 rs ) - » 4 5 = ; “ a . a C C m4 >) MH n PY Gis 3 oO + > . Su ~ © S C+ ‘ =" - ! 43 : ~~« 4 ay » si ' > < “ ae ~ : . - P&H S @ O WY _ 1 x @ * . SS i ) C3 t3 - ° > } 5 oe! r — ‘ ty ; : ° » S $4 $ ; C > “A Q &O “ a ; v orf 2 C4 ® » | ° ‘ + C > Sneed : 4 o MS S > CS wll we os : 3 oe } 4 ) © 2 c — > = a) ; tO —~ 43 : G4 ; cc + o @ at ; : Co a ocd $3 & hk. « ~ ‘ ’ oO : ore CN ENS 1 ‘ ‘ ‘ & - C4 Q Co = j ‘ 4 cal . a) ) ‘ XG q | o ¢ “i ae — : > > x ° x 3 C, = : ; ‘ 3 ee : : 7 ; & 4 8p c ) 3) W a i _ “ . } @ © “3 © iv . ‘ + “4 . Os + Qed 4 ) Oo ' - : E+ £3] On -+ 4 4 $, 4 e 4 i “ es aa = QO “ i v = r an ) aot _ ae * 4 = : f 4 —- ci: a tf 4 o~4 } G4 x - OF] »p > = o = wn ® . oe : . ba re = oe 1 is 4 “A > t : 6% O ° i S oO fa a oe | cs .. 4 Gc ; & _S ) - . . HP & > , o - — o CeO 0 - 2 C s &, “4 aS 2 oO | ‘ 2 2 c o4 e— ,Q ® -4 $ S l : Y ? S16 o ’ o os . S&S Bom ae § © ec ay { L . ; ~ m ¢. 5 oa i 4 ¢ ; . + i oa ey <5 ! “a Pp 5 A 42 gs 4 ? Sy . i 2h “4 —- = Oo 7 . | : - ¢ E+ fw 2 “4 * ; yi ; = J a4 ‘| . *r . S, a) . ~ i re © ‘ ¢ . . . ‘ : 4 ‘ rod 5 ° > on co os - f 2 — 4 a4 6 - © « ¢ al Oe oaee > Sy Oo ' <a oe ? <a oe ee ee oF wee ee et -~ arhea Glu a —_— 7 ~<- —_ c ff 626 1 . a a a = oe ee A D -. fo 3 , : ot = 3 fJoa O oe ee o ; = = > St Oo - { Hi U is S } : 2s, 7S $ pp ) 5 a = . + ae = & 3) G4 + - 1 { © o 3 er +2 ° - S38 Sed 3 2 . . . ° } HS o 2 ° Aer $4 G + 4 : mH 5 154 2 ) @ ; e- oH © 1 . mr é =f - v2 4 4 2 $4 . . . . . 4 oo ° 2 = t > ' ‘ , : > . a BY et 4+ 3 i} : : > c, 3 3 7 =3 4 ‘ : i <1 a} 7 > rm | we t : <3 ry . 7 m = ._ 2 : : : f= $4 > : e A ® os +? > } oi > ; pam 4 = @ oO c OQ 1 : mw =< ‘ . ” : ‘ 2 J ‘ i > ? ? G4 - , ; ‘ > 4 —_ o” 2 @ oO ) $ _ 4 S > ; oO ro) > > 5 : . ) E~ 4 $ 3 FS . q@ j $ D , eit : a ; ; = ; : a +> -> C4 { CJ CN =F ~? ) oy 1 : + . © oe ; ¢ ’ 8 at "co ~ ’ nm , — 4 - | S w@ ; ¢ = . ¢ ‘| < So 4 ae ) ' z 3 1 4 S 5 : 7) $y 4 4 o| = ' —— ; . —t y f ee = , ~ 2 + ° ™ = On 7 ; z : ‘ d 4 2 cd J ¢ om ? “A @ . a Q@ ¢ 3 t i a Han : ) 4 J > ¢ E+ =] > - : : : ; ' re 7 £4 E4 ON + : - 4 : : . _ rf - - r ; 3 > ‘ ” Or & asd ~ -— f a« ©) fA ”~ eae , ’ . pu ¢ = 7 pen % ¢ | h4 es a . ’ p ‘ cy ft.) a 4 ‘ 3 ‘ c =~ ; i » C4 ; , a t Oo $ ) 4 nippig 4b lovember 1 | : - me | ro a :2>) C : — so oe : = a S 4 . i re ; oi (7 r = rif 3 oad r ° ‘—— oT oO “A - 4 4 oO ¢ <n a 33 % oO sini caleaaneepapiaibiaaiaaimainiaaiien ine wed 6 antennae \ aa ) ) - E+ f-1 + CREXC t) § : —_ rc OS - ) 2 or . rm 4 | : ae i fe ; “4 » 7, ; © a | ~ . > : , i =, 1 ; by : Or 4 2 3 ti — S, @ Sy > | ; ~o oO 42 ; : | 4 SJ 4 rx . ad : | 122 es % ; n° a O 3 =I 3 o J § © = 4 : . . D i m+ pong { | : | Ai > - ua * 7 oO io oO 3 - | lei ak hoe ! om § » | Bt 2. BS | 3 th . § 7 a+ aoe ond 7 : 3 cae . 3 @ 4 re -« 7 | > i) S » S4 . ' | a os 6 ie - 2 / HOW co 2 = ~~ 5) | : ag . — cS) : 3 | e- S44 ; > } aa | . | ; : ae ot eso ‘ . on S S | | | oa * > Oo Y ) >) : ea ¢ ps + } - Q : ik 4 . : : 74 > “ F i 3 - ; a PES peccg DE “ae | : AQ ce) —@ ‘ Se a ee . ; : é oO | 3 7 | | : : : a ) - L = = 3 1 4 D = 5} p> er ; sp : Se aS 2 cs ‘ . ' co z s } ; : WY n “s ed $y G4 4 i | : o e | @ <r G4 - | | aes “ot a oO oe : | 7 | 3 a = < oS : : | = A pl : . a 4 os °o os o r ao - ; 3 2 s a @ ? ; 2 : © ) . 5 | : i + > | : a Ss ye de “ 3 : = Y E ; ; od o f+ . 2 - : 3 r 4 2 _t bs @ s ber , } | rs 3 =: bs , : on 3 : a a 2 Ea © 3 : . od : 2 : rt S ; 3 ? 3 : MH o . — r 3 | | a : 3 , : 2 S 4 2 , = i ) d : 3 2 . ) : | } a | 3 : : $s —_ ' a | | : ‘ S 4 > 4 G4 O ® 3 : - > Oo ) “d ao ; o y > = : ri a + & 1 ro) 5 : ) t- 5 er i . ; Kay OS t i * . r > tod - | 3 , | : . ~ ~ E+ F-10N ve : ; : C3 E+ “Ap S : r = = - aS = © ~ i 0 ie “ | . 3 Om « { 7 , : o fain 3 | | 3 os’ : ) 4 ! . 3 wala e- -4 “4 : ; ce r ’ ) ; | , Offs S | : : : 4 > © , < F » ot i 5 - es 4 : : . a = ; 7 fer Q - : Dib : | : | ; a e/a 7 ii. oO : Fak ; tid o« O | Ea fa ps > . 3 ; C4 ' : 3 | =~ oO q | : 7 rita <¢ : ; —. oe 3 = O | 3 , Yr ; | | = : : | 7 4 , | | : c 4 oO a 4 > “4 { o ee a a ER Ae oe Lae 6 ae See nee T ace ill ge — Gy ‘ “4 oc = ( - c ° co feds a © @ « ® iii r c2 for a4 + Pay : oO = © ; : 3 $ 7 O CL @ i ri fy os 3 oO O ' b i owe 4 4 Kft sy 2 fg : . | : Fac . 5 J w “ ® rj i wi le + 72 8 o : { > oO . = > » 2 Para & @ 4 a $ a ‘ 4 — SS 2 Me — Oo M4 C4 . 4 i a) , oie ont < ; a S . © O C 7 i 3 4 iS > 1> _ ) . ne ee 7 ne 4 i +4 ‘ ~ id > ery - SS *% - : ' 4 Ef o a 4 . { 3 y. S, > t t j , ™ a fF fs) ae Cc c ot e ao { o tm q q 5 ¢ omen di © 2 « CO ‘ oO 42 = 5 ¢ 0 S ‘ : ; — = By 4 j ~) : . = ‘ ‘d ® ¢ * : O » - ‘ a : ; Q od Y rv uw ¢ ‘ 2 1 = C ? U m9 : = — 2 > 4 1 n = re YD 3 4 Oo : ° . : > 4 : i co & S ° © oO . 4 “ : by + ; , oO 0 > = { ° . ; ; us rs ny a a - > ” eo 1 b4 a , A i 4 % : Ss . oe + \ ~ . rt 4 . ct 4 ) 2 ha 1a 5 C4 ’ ® x 4 i a : ‘ ae ; «~ : 4 . > 3 4 ; = c & » e ° C4 ri ° j e : ; : ‘ ‘ Ss oO ~\ ‘ { i ~ . = ; 3 9 : ¢ - . - > 2 “ S md = 4° ca j \ ‘i ‘ c ‘ ro mt D oO . i > j ° Ss oO o ka c> 4 t9 ‘ } cal : ‘ - “At q el a = = . ss Ss ~ as o { ? ° - 3) x et @® oO @ 1 ys $ a - . 1 ‘ “ rc Lo a ‘ dq 3 3 4 F ws 2 2 ; oe Oo a : 42 2 ee i i ‘ ‘ Se o $1 rd ‘ ‘ > > : ‘ : ; { S i c i ; < = $ 2 5 c> a — = ; : > ‘ “~ OQ ; ; = Bs . 4 Pe - ‘ . <_< ' > > 4 : de , +2 { 4 4 = iis S “ ; . 3 a 4 “4 : ; > < et S ; o a @ ) , 3 4 e ord ° » ¢ ; a . : ° ee Sa oS o CH : 2 a > ® > “df oO = : . 2 ; : - 1 - > ’ by i 4 Se 1) Or . ak & @ : > 5 c 4 { oe ¢ i ® : 2 4 ce » +> oO x : = 3 © S G S, GH 3 “~ 2 req oO ¢ oul m4 . = ~ G 2 O » : : ° ~~ Ss > > i s oS ® r ‘ C ~ —" oil w~ J 2Fr 2 : 4 = : ” . a4 pee | el ON S @ Oo “A Y re ~y G4 ’ 4 EA G4 ‘ @ n~ ~ G4 ‘ ~" S S4 — S . 2 “7 = be 3 c= tO 5 ; 7 } a ee td ; © | 5 c 7 ee E4 £4 Cr ed 5 a = On i ot < | oO “ C4 . ot 3 J 03 r~ “ ~ -~ ' r p Of a c Oo sl : ' | a oO cs : 4 ¢ 4 os OMmw “i ey ' 7 , : Q) 5 ) ° of [2s 2 ht ~ + ‘ ) ‘ . a O> t . os a . @ tO ® > asi : . : OS = 2 | i : 4 — es 3 » 4 > > : < c . 24 4 a 4 3 & § ® c Qa) : C4 | 3 = i at ES $ C4 re. 5 t) | ) , S 2.8 3 | es . —-€ l ry % 4 . ¢ a8 Z fe | ; ; 4 G4 re = 4 © : S 4 —) am den Q 4 a 4 ' ‘ ; E > rcs a ; .. > ; c. > = oot » : : : =f 3 o. Has “3 r ° > ; ba 2 r ad oe ) $4 Sy 4 a oO ) £ { ) — — we on O 4 « i c 3 @ ~ <A e — ee ee ee 3 ) © a ° ? * e r< 3 er a - . 1 - ci Oo 4 t oO > ; : . ; + C w) “dA ? “ } : Se CS a a ae ae en ate A Re ae eager mee ea ne nh Rt FF VS a a ee ee ext ? aa for two years Yes | =r - ’ November swier.s ontinuous] ins OND WE Monday, eC Laa\ action? art << ee ee } A am Li Ut fy WY MNTAD AV bil NT 2 ee crt ee in te te i aR Ra ae ee ae ne ee ee ST seen Satie - Sd aa caiee Sade ee Ree Se Ss SS Co ci , 7 nm VUUIL onan TD aed ait a VTID | _ 4 L Navernhe 76 ( e NOVEMoer 15 ’ iI ry é aly wi oe > c Wyo e re . ed e n~ Ome Qo sy - HS o : Gt. or ee « £ + Cc ¢ fH G a $= ; m0 » ‘ - eon - 4 wis Su 1 ‘ oe —AjJ a = 4 fa . tf] & ‘ & a, r4 cS { a. 9 ‘ “4 ‘ - HO Ss 4 j =O 1 1 4 ) — Sy 4 J £4 — — <a oO ~ 4 a ~ ¢> oO + . 4 tf aad oo - em j 2 wv” #9 el ag 4 2 + —< < me e A 4 Sy “ ‘a ‘c ”~ ” . « ‘ - r v ‘ ; v4 > . < - 4 i =— ? ® : ‘ ow a ia be ‘4 ‘ 1 : © M as 4 ) ) i $ Su t > an - > rl o ® ® . , : . i ae ° 4 h S { ¢ no $ oe ‘ \ . rl y = + 4 ba > 4 ; ae a ‘ 2 > 4 : : : e * : et a | ; ‘ : Su D> ba >>" - \ rs . i / ‘ « ~ - ‘ ‘ j bs s 2 , ‘ 2 4 s 4 oO > ' 4 > 4 9 oT 1 -~ i ”~ > i A 2 > ** ¢ aA > 4 ib ’ i . , : se a ? +> @ 2 ° . < : : = 7 > . 3 re) s a 4 G4 tb oO ) es s 4 “ie ~ m4 o ; ) S S 3 oo @® ~ oO 3 ; : ‘ > “A = prt » c e : oO ® 4 « a 4 . +4 - So Oro c3 S$. S ©) Sy 4 yi) » . e . > a 4 at o S oO > 7) oO ¢ _ 4 4 oOl1M "TS 4 Ay oa @® 7 \ 4 o : = . a oa ri ~~ 31 cy S 3 3 2 ‘ ae O|& @ & 5 ; : 3 , ° ae aS oa ss 7 % a ® - a os = ~ ~ : - ° O r ® e}@ mc) 4 er C4 Qa “e 4 b) wa & Oo D : ° . 1 ° @ 0 dt + a cl rd el 2 7) a 5 : t 4 an { . i ae < w L } + 4 > . ; o G4 z =. > + pe ti 4 . 5 = 4 S a { + ° . ‘ ; - 2 or? ON a G4 5 + ms by 4 i : . of 3 ‘ 5 ry 5 ‘ 4 ) Oo » 3 os - r = ' » 4 D . : a nrloO $ os . ro ) 3 ns “dk ‘ » C, © ~ w , a . . c + “A > ) 3 a> ~~ —O * i +4 MM hu 0 TY ‘ re fw ie fy ey — — , \ ~ ”~ ¢ Oo Vim << ig lng 4 : S + Oo @ S 4 ) IO oc mist oS Oo © @ 4 t 4 > ‘ ° ; 5 , Sa ce he C) yi = e . 4 ; : ¢ a S S “d cd by ) a z 3 _ en) Ga & ef 05 : ) r “ c . cr) =r oO > c a oO Oo : “ f ; P S, ‘ O t C lo. £ ”~ © ©) e r { i 4 a : , ©. 5 s bos : - _ ~ a ¢ 4 c - ‘ £2 FQN bi bjt c ) i b, . dp 32 O44 a4 = ~ Oo : ; : C a roles 5 - od . ~~ ‘ ¢ a ci. aa a bs , ‘ A ce ao a4 4 6 a t Bs cn 4 ; ° &) ra jo 4 oO ¢ ‘ : ee oO os Ss ‘oa ; an = = O © > orf - 5 : |» o ue D , “ Q o POs © o C + @ L ~ - ; fe . = 4 - 4 ? eo a | ° - 7 ra 4¢ SS ee ot oe 4 i 4 4+ 4 ce 4 = < ‘ E+ [3 5: > Cc “ dq rd a 3 : 4 ) 4 . ae ‘ £ “~ c Ay y ae - at Bar tee pers Fo Ses = $F Sah convenes sourt Qa = oO S oO * a. iT eS Pe ee ars ee Sale a i. Sea se Pe ae ten Lc pvile iniiinn. ving Nats ~O -> CN mck W > a MATT youd 0 h,19 4 } 4 HP Ap sit ab ad er 16t wTATE OR OV } i K = IC nN ; Novell “— TT sien EE oe 25 ee. al ak a ee Se mag a gy a Oe See ae ~ — “ as = Sa = Se Ee ee ae + Aa ¢ 1b og} a Court th ~ U Nor $b superior + hy : vne envy , ro. Wists. mmm INN } NT ¥ n} Novelli in ) } a carta Sed : - : - - Se re Ee me SF ER ee EET EERE EE A a ER ER el NT TiS V+ ana a —m 4 ‘ hy -- 7 wn“ oa ° * =< a ) ; . ol SS PF — —~ — — _ . 4 4 f4 E) of a a seas 7 - = » 7 ry I; 5 : : 1 ee = © - 4 . . 4 . . “4 to ets > <a et exon Smet eaee ox i 4 = Z $4 an ac was . : : . @ q 3 re cS ; =< ¢ © : 2 .e wD < m ‘ rt e > G4 43 end e E cq 4 o a : Cs . e m - = a = ° . rie r5 C . ‘ j 4 4 i oO 4 cH oO ~ e i ot 4 — ; 5 ei = e% ; 2 : co : : : 4 > $ 4 : = fy oS $4 > $ as) $ A . ° 2 S, - c i > | : 3 © “4 c ¢ ‘ sfc by > { : Pd i ° 4 ° —u col e — ~ - > . 3 = =~ rc 4 . ae, ic. by -| @ } . <O + ,) | * — «J > Oo ~}-— =e At ie “o .. : out ‘ : Cc S : S E44 Co i q C2 fQ a Q 4 > — ES < wi © Y as be Qo . Ie 4 | 5 : ; f ) . 8 ae re) - + 2 a) 2 & ; +4 - 22 e = a | ff. -. © —_ | 4 —a re oy 4 ¢ 4 zs i eo <6 A eo i = e a Sa ser SSS fe Ee eee ere a ill igs Sei teal ae i =" nia Sal bas he Ee Ae ae ne oe eo SS Ee wr tees “ “ pe sap ES PES EE EE wea Te SS ES Sa ORE ea ee SS a eee sth. taccaigncttantitleat tae — PELE LE EGE LE OIE SCTE, RE ai eR Pn a oe ae aes . ‘ is ex nine enh eee ae _ P aa ES i: 7 z a eee S - a 2 5 = - pie ae SS San Ste cae eae = soem me ee laren ater ok . = TEPER SPs SSE PSs FE IO Ee a OR ee ease net, Nei aS ad e = anaemia Sie Te eee wt te No. 4494 i TM omy . NORTI CAROLINA N A IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNT Ty MAROT,T] PUAAM VAnvisd THON) on JUNTY TREDELL UUUNL Mrs. We C. Templeton - _ vrs, Lillie Barker Vs. Executor of es Mrs. Etta Crater seid smith, Sxecutor 1" tre Will of Mrs. GBoUa Ure THIS CAUSE nins to be heard, and being heard before Hon.¢.6, we nr + Je died Yad ’ Smith, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court in controversy as set out in the complaint in this cause have >d settled by consent, and it further complaint in this cause have been fu sintiff asserts that she has no iurtie laim « any nature consent, an ind upon receipt of tne sum of set isfaction of any ~ her favor against ar nerein reierred Uist ; recover of the defendant tue sum ol said co: amounting plaintiff Ad NA ~Vwo omitis a 77 Ie athe 7 se ‘ttorneys for Ru DY acomay By Raymer ae ¥ TO Ne A tye bxecutor of tne xsvate “y+ JU. Le. Raymer Se » AssUahkTS FOR Plaintiff O ~+ ee LLa vrater SSS Elledge § Browder a ~ ak e “xecutor ol ne Kets Et . fh EState of Irs, ttta VY ater hy: arcnie Elledge attorneys for Defendant Mrs. we C, Templeton - > Ry A , 2 , Plaintifr —tiarcuie Elledge + —— oh ae Attorneys for Defendat et wie ate ate ale ste ste te DIE AS 35 IR AE OS r ee ras to visit the minor son, John Clifford Reneps= right , iitord Kenegar, at such reasonable YANAT CAROLIN«a, In the ouperior Court —— times as “1 / HW VUUNLL e are consistent with the child's welf é ld welfare, and the defendant snalj have the right to have said minor c.ild visit hip at such times % ma suc! me as ne zabeth Renegar, i - | elages | | child may desire, and as may be mutually agreed upon by the plaintiff “ ’ y tne plainti Plaintiff, ) defendant. De tnat at tne time of the signing of this ord turee 315.00 weekly payments wi - . 2 + $ : a > = mtvered in tALS Cause on Nove to be heard before His 194¢ Fall Terns of the Superior Courts of the North carolina, and being heard by agree. eee as te That the defendant shal plaintiff and the defendant, plaintiff, and tne Subsistence for herself that the no + is ‘ } witnout Alvorce, and id counsel fees for t | Court of Iredell County, , . Yas ~ - < ~ ° ~ » te fy 4 + > . uid 1t Lurtner appearing to tne Court tic | ( agreed upon a se ement and compromise as order Hundred Twenty baila into tne the defendant and ~ aintenance » and tie rewaining ER) £1.00 Uitis , 7 , . 1 ned f anv jant shall not hereafter be responsible for at 5 ES = ee 2 > - : s wife, and shall not be requir nd at the request of his the niaineitt, d defendant, Join Ray nance or support for the pall ’ ’ Bm way i ae ‘ Sadia attorneys for the plaintiff, and “inderry, defendan+. *w4sUdllus, ) “~* — ¥ it the plaintiff and defendant each hereby releases and 1. That the defendant and iis property now owned or hereafter ye ae ST other. : is all respects released from the claims and demands of t Plaint4 P44LNU] f f ‘ : ° ~ 1 3 , f Or alimony, maintenance or s up, ort for her self ’ and the rights, interest and control over the person of the a eee defeng ——e pm ee vy an hal) 7s > . t wned by ant shall not be liable for any maintenance and support for the ‘nat the household and kitchen furniture heretofore 0 the plaintiff and dafandaus : ‘ > ms le iff i 3 W } ired ak payme piaintiff and defendant, and now in the posses of the pla and shall not be required to mak payment of statesville, North Carolina, shall be the sole and separate ee or support for the plaintiff, his wife. «»« That the household and kitchen furniture heretofore med by the Ae RE yer l plaintiff and defendant, and now in the possession of the lainticr ; rm . +) ne if Ve s ’ e ehs } 3 that the plaintiff shall have the control and custody of th *n the City of Statesville, North Carolina, shall be the sole mine Ss J Clan ‘ he name Sem Clas iond Kenegar, and that the defendant shall have ¢ and separate property of the plaintiff, Alice Elizabeth Renegar, ee , leacane ‘es sa et That the plaintiff, Alice Elizabeth R sie } » A bet 1 menegar, shall have the ) control and custody of Join Clifford Renegar, minor son of the plaintire ‘ and defendant, and chat the defendant shall have the right to visit his minor son, Jolin Clifford Renegar, at such reasonable times as are consistent wit; the child's welfare, and the defendant shall have the rirht to have said minor son visit him at such times as the son may desire, and as may be mutually agreed upon by the plaintiff and defendani. That at the time this order is signed, the defendant shal: ay to the Cli of the Superior Court of Iredell County tue three $15.00 uave becouwe due under the order entered in this cause for the maintenace and suport Jollars Fifty sum of Twelve 1 yment to be made on l.onday, Dece:i:: week until the lef dell County, sounty benefit lant, John Ray Reneg: r, attorney fee to be paix rT 5 ’ red nts Lreageii vount der, ° ve the right h reafter to make such ota Beem just and propere Vecember, We J. A. Rousseau Judge holding t of the Fif v a District of Nort» ve zed Zab th nenerar — dt .Zabeth Rene » DEARAN & WINDEY ve Fe WINBERRY Attorneys for the A aad as fla ad John Ray Renegar Deiendant Elbert & Attorney ft he Vow” Pteen sudict4) ian No.4590 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY f Vacuum Oil Company Socony VYacuull Vis . Plaintiff Je Re Brown, Defendant This cause coming on to be of tne ouperior Jour AEALNSt th sd , Ue re oO omith Sal tne Superior Lourt. De That the Trustee in bankruptcy, under the orders of the In the Superior ¢ Derior Court in bankruptc offered the i + a Y > e © referee in ptcy, bove described personal property at Before the Clerk : : ? : ic sale, subject to the indebtedness tuneee : public sale, J of the plaintiff, but was unable Specialities Appliance Corp., | to obtain any bid thereon, Plaintiff, 6. That thereafter the Honorable R. Marion Ross, Referee in Bank ‘ - 2c if) ain]= ruptcy, and W. Re Battley, Trustee of the aforenamed bankrup! , released Harry P, Grier, Jr, bins. CONSENT JU IGM ANT wal 4 Harry P. Grier, Jr., an L. 6, Grier, partners, trading and doing business : 1 — = ae a ing the same to the plaint ‘. Buff's Products Co., releasing t preene yee he avove described personal property from the estate of the vankrunt nkrupt, 7° } That it has how been agreed that tre ' ‘ 7 Se ye . interes coming on to be heard before ( smith, Clerk of tre [redell County, North Carolina, by consent espective counsel, and it appearing to the Court: plaintiff should have the rifht to personal property privately, and inany im and delivery in which the plaintiff ’ _ ‘ : ; — —— 4 in consideration of t] aforesaid sell one Speciality Potato Chip Cooker, manuactured by : —.> —— vr ; : = ’ . ersonal prope rin fu lance vVorporation, l.ojel No. 150;, Serial — property in ful held a conditional sales contract on the aforesaid conditional sales contract, al sales contract being dated April Ce That the cost in this action two dollars (.3&&2.00), with interest thereon. ~ jefendants, nor either of t ~* dan ji or against the surety on thei action was instituted on the 22nd day of July, 1946, an + : 4 : , ¥ : } esee4 f said of or in conne j wit! this Court directing the Sheriff to take possession ol sé or in connection with perty; that the plaintiff gave bond as was required by law, and ™ & wae property, the conditional ao Qo : a . ‘ r ; a tie ej b fc =) } e i her — “ay of August, 1946, the Sheriff of Iredell County seized ™ inbelore described. . ; ie ier- THEeRRRORR > and wit} he ser ed personal property, and the defendants did not give the under voy THSREPORE, by and with the consent hs . _ *ne anc fenda hs ‘s r Dea ” = ? e vasing required by law, and the Sheriff delivered said personal property to“ 1 defendan >, and W, R, Battley, Trustee for i.rs. Oe von af trad; . olai f he tome i2 ; . . : ' gion & ing as B "'s | j s Comp: Bankrup laintiff, and the same is now, and has been since that time in thepossess E uff's Products Company, Bankrupt, JECREND: the plaintiff, 3 1. That all matters and things arising between the plaintiff P ! Th A + } . . . . 3 S ontr ‘nat the balance now due and owing on said conditional sales ¢ at av an y - . > ° ‘ ‘ o ; hie id defendants on the aforesaid conditional sales contract and in this ta We, TT, } me ¢ . a j - y e +S Five llundred Zighty-eight Dollars (58.00) principal sum and interest “tton have been fulay and completely settled, and that the defendants and W, R ‘. Battley, Trustee, have no further right, title, interest or *ifty-two Dollars One Cent (352.01), making a total of Six Hundred Forty Doli® Une Cent (640.01), State or claim in, to, or on the above described personal property. i é. That the plaintiff is the owner of the personal property des i ‘ 4 1 ’ *ribed as follows: One Speciality Potato Chip Cooker, manufactured an. ; , Griels That on or about the llth day of September, 1946, Irs. Harry Fe ® ets b ’ - ‘ : yf Pal : f's Product Y the “Pecialities Appliance Corporation, Model No. 150, Serial ad judges Nlo, £4179-150, Jr., under the ' a ' . ’ 1e name of lirs, Eleanor “vans Grier, trading as Buf vompany, filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, and has now been bankrupt. 3. That the plaintiff is not required to sell the above q €Scribeg property at public sale, and that the plaintiff shall have the right ¢ 0 Own, hold and dispose of the above described property in any way or manner th e 4 tT 1at the cost in this LO hé S been ai } any? : e } action na ‘ pe Gy and al iabilj of the plaintiff and the surety on the cost bond, and on the niaints ’ the Plaintiff's under, taking in connection with the seizure of the above described personal proper; is fully andcompletely discharged. That the plaintiff is not to recover any Court cost fron & Je taxed in this action to be paid by the 3a ? +> ~- m ~ sourt cost as December, 1948, ’ Qn Pm Ve ‘Je wil mi vlerk of Superior Court of Iredell Céunty tp Pare LiNCITE 2+ \oodhouse 7 -—--—--—— LOY iWPrse tradine ily y - No. 45521 North Carolina, Iredell County. J, B Miller, Plaintiff, Vs. Jarnest Mason, Defendants, JF Shinn, Suretv In the euperior Court uU Before the plerk This cause coming on to be heard and Hon. C. G. Smith, Clerk of the Superior Court o; 19th, 1949, and it appearing to to foreclose upon a chattel delivery was issued for the poss that rf the court tha L.ortgag ession of upon the of Iredel} and retained ‘ Ba A111 vO tne Court + juperior Court of Iredell] any remainded if further ordered ‘Ubomobile ie n- ne 41@ is not sufficient to OO Hladmnacan PAdlntiff nave and recover Lne i roce iaw, and eds of said County,te any that if the pay off and such deficiency suretv. “115 19t.., dav of Jan. 1919. He Bik dhe aie aie ake she ate ste ale 9 Ce G. Smith Clerk of superior Court of Iredell County. + ere , : Sea ai cali inte raloaias # Pp epee pe emer rece ee cok a = tie aad — ae s ny. 1 WOe ly North Carolina, In the Superior Court * . + | Iredell County. 1 to be heard and being heard before His Honor *s T ient Judge of the 15th Judicial istrict of North sarolina, at Chambers, and the sourt finding as 2 a - Va defendant were married in oreensbor ) ever Since said time they have beer iren were at on ol ey h nerritt, their infant child, John and failed to provide them with and conditions in ahs ; = ’ y ~ + + ehil ay vgoln Ve Merrit . has lived with nd the Court finds as to have the custody and control said chib wou- at the best interest of nother, the plaintiff. the Court that the defendant and support of the plaintiff and after taking into consideration the nlaintifr a -tderation the plaintiff and after takine into consideration plaintiff and it further appearing to the court that + ent4+) } h ‘ ° : ° + 2 “Nvitied to the relief jemanded in this cause. AHOMSPORE. ORDERED. ADJWGED AND DECREED: l. Th ae os Sf, Mary Cutis that the defendant, Vewey H. Merritt, pay to his wile, Mary herritt, the s 6( ee of ’ € sum of 360.00 on the 10th day of February, 1949, ana oe on the LOth t he Court; ‘ay of each month thereafter until the further order of ; ek ee oo 4 ‘hat the said monthly pavments shall be paid to the plaintiff for the benef, maintenance < supp ‘ : hn bs venance and support of the plaintiff, and the aforesaid minor child, Jo Merritt. ¢ ny : aqj } f 5 - 2. That the said defendant, Dewey H. Merritt counsel fee the 10th day of January, 1949, said sum to be naa a ; : : I ritchell, Attorney at Law. 3. That the plaintiff, be, and she is heret y plete custody and control of John C, Merrit, the aforesaj 4. That the defendant be allowed to vi », Merritt, at the plaintiff's home in Joh Ve +t any school which the said minor child mav it any re] : A ta Y 47) Asad 44 ot interfere with his studies or norma] + aimee vvOrney “2S Cause coming on to be heard, and being igned C7 4erk of the “uperior Court of Iredell County, North Caroli fey and sun day of ' ; det 2. .°2 ant . ; Januarv, 1949, on motion of Adams, Dearman & Winberry, ‘OP the pl + start, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to ‘Ourt ; l. 2a On Denn, . , er é, 1948, the plaintiff filed a duly verified Complaint ” " above ent; *ntitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell “tty NOe ANTS) varth Carolina AQ a “~e In the “uperior Court ons was issued from this Court on December ] 1948 ’ » tO the tyedell Countv Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law fusatcure Concane? -oyunt Holly Furniture Company 36 10 | vs That the Summons was served on the defendant by wade Moore — » Yevuty seorge Duncan Sheriff of Iredell County, on December 3, 1946, by leaving with the defendant Opy of the Sum.ons, together with a copy of the Complaint, are ; , : y : 7 The Plaintiff on its own motion y ind Cc Le time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and + . fs , See One It is, therefore, ordered and aw for tue defendant to answer has now elapse and no ane. ae i “My Alu TO an wer : the cost of the plai nti or. pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant, oe rified complaint filed by the plaintiff demands judment wighty-five Dollars (3255.00) with interes , hn hoe 4402 annum, and for cost upon the complaint ae Peas north Varolina opeen made b ne ndant,. ia Aa i lredell County '.otor Transfer Company, Incorporated, “ove STLvevve 25.00), together with interest thereon at the November 27, 1946, until his own motion desires , GC. G. omith ‘ Clerk of Superior Court o Iredell County. In the Superior Court 11 County ie Hines j tre fines } TL, 5 Sn “an . » 1s m r «suit. He riaintiff on his own motion desires to take a voluntary non - Si —_ g . ss : dismissed at +t is therefore ordered and adjulged that the action be dismis tne cost of the plaintiff, C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court 106 44.95 , N ‘ euperior Court In the = . © tH «G4 “2 GH ort wp os Try eet c ~wv re Busine va LUV E+] = =i rs VW Vii OY cause coming Ol slp rk > le la fandnia aelenaal urt that the , UO to the er fF 4 e Sts. COs 1 the 1id c aa W wrtr Lua ~WUi bbls vi iat the acti + U } reed red mipins EE I ee aith Y w/ had urt = ) 4VUu Ge C $ » c Y 1s > 4 fy 4 4 re) + u our ) YU er. Su} In the wake 4 ires to Sil ic tion n acti +} Uliec 1 that decreed A A Smith * nllaitn mri SB IE Se saaiatetenen a tee peraor vourt G. erk ou} ‘ Ve Qn Vv IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK =-= JANUARY Tic * i JANUARY 1 Wy 194.9 Monday, January 318t, 1949 No. 4573 North Carolina 2TH CAROLINA, yak WYTINITYY nent } IPEDELL YOUN LI « dik Iredell County eid > —— ee sa vganuar £ T JUC STE ST OEMS, El SE Nig CREB te are “ a ard and beings of Iredell Oscar Turner S. Pare We F. Morrow ; ©, Stvrorn as ¥oreman of the Grand Jury. » WAS Sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury Jon CWing were exeused by the Court, Dent Lackey,hjiss Sadie Alexander, TO £63) win. and R. Wilson Brantley. The Siieciae was not served, iIirs. Mary C. Brown wwing was exeused on Doctor's certificate, li. li. Warren > SUPE r IN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THE \. oL9 ? Au. cord os Os be mma ae qc -=) -% ht oh © - 9 Sel cs“ mae om cae 345 WEEK 4 1y, January y e Cc liond a 2 IRotT On + On re ON — ON i -- JANUAR TERM, conday, January 31st, WISEK } 4 FIRST talesman lowing rh Cc 4 1] on cf x ort — — os 6) = Y ry OM O er ae State vs 5 Use “weavis ibe jurors: ki arreni . rn Qa i Aw Tm a A e eG swor L. and Y) were \ 7 oe L a) ard et ee vy in Leon a y saudi ormer order under ued = oN oN ‘ohn Leonard —_——< ae ~ sOSi ee —_ a ets 2 t alled iant defen ias ine 2 c > = ow +> rat ss “2 @ - > 3 ee itinued y A ;0 3 a oe ~ “i e> : 4/7 e€ Al condi fot wo eo ©) DHen {on 222 Ah oe. ae v iine to vw c ee ee a oO ) @2 ° ~ 7 a 4 > — eee e l Muary 31st Te Uc TI WY ae yeloly IN liond ay, AST Y 4 a ki + * ON ay Ororn a cS st, 154, aid c i] mn IN THE SUPERIUK CUURT ARY y 4 JANL nuary 31 roany LOA To va l.onday, 1 4 mrmam L TROT ST rRT Ty JUNK - . ¥ 116i 6N ,Orney torney ‘ 4au > his through /ontendre aant one WOLO “ ue t! Curt is that . YY ic <—~ me ON ee e 4) . i > . 4 . O 1 ~ ¢ 4 | oo : : = , ct } j 5 i ’ : 2 : » nw ) . @ 5 rat Mm ) i 4 ‘ < a. aig a C t, © . 7 rico : ; ‘ ~ ~~ i > : ; 4 "" 5 os “ ? > a i © os et ee Pad Dean Deen oe : te ee es pane ar i — 4 Se ® SS rt ™ - = —4 , : aes ; a4 ‘ 3 + 3 : — ‘ . Sa t 449 ? . . ; ; c « > c = : m4 s ' i vb - 4 ~ ry . . . . . ~ » - e > > ho > 4 49 ,e) ~ $ by = b . . » ~~ . : < " 4+ oO ; - 41> 4 ~- ~ > et r 4 - 41> ba 7G a O mH ong © c tua Se 42 4 1LS ret t rou eee ee ieee eeeteiereieate ne tele ae ata ae ee - Se ees sid wads biU & oe GUILTY + a i Y | ” c y a pie 9 of NOT enters U av io lefendant Directed a verdict A\ E q 4 ‘ 4 — ee — Bil] 191,0 Q L, ee; ~~» At Pa O6ed a 7q - > > O x ©) 2 (\t> Wat ERIC U] EK == JANUARY he ‘ ro) February 1 f.? mis . e+ > an mH & eee Pate, -~ -> re 7 RST r Luesa 9 —t cn © Hc a oN =, V ct & eon ai oo Fae 32 at. JUARY : Hae ce « - 7 bn ae 7S ¢ ~ i ae —- § SS mid = 2 < > } U¢ ‘cording ad ,« ple conven: 191.9 } nhonorat lis H bruarv lst ° if e my n ‘orning, ¢ A v ° hi ud si “> G4 a: al 2 ? ‘ > aa a gee Ia SS a ae oe =a OG Fried «<) gO 4 0 ‘43 Oo S —~ + y — Se @ ti ) = so 2 —— $4 S > G4 “we 4 4 / os 39 > “ey ee a ee n » oh as oOo Ho 5 ae sy “ey ond ) ou cS 'ws + £5 Qo - a | ha Se i ’ dadbvaa > oy aH ® aH csc 4 ° 4> 245 4 m4 iy << ee f VOIP Ul c tne oa rH Oo 2° “e435 + 7 om by ok 0s apt 9S Ay a er “ 4 a 2 ' + EH rt @ 1 2 4 a i =] . 42 i 4 os 4 O 4r)> Dp —| r4 2 Hoa + 4 Ss = 1 re 1 oO ts >) et +2 > 5 + > O >} ey <—~ ~~ e o - > co G4 + © + P * a) ¢ 452 ~ Oo 2P yp 0 Ww J 4 of SE A et a wl ma WOrdk » 2404 +otpa JVaue » OTR » +» - > : a < D> f wr c a Oi 4 4 4 ort y t Zz True ended, BAL Loa CY» +7 LAPrce Bill 44 lV y vib Qo Ry Wud Bill "Y > i PUE A <a ee on sa 0 POLUDING it avs ) (cH. Tio } A N THE SUPERIOR Court IN Tue gup ATH A rear Ay AD ATS © l ize J { yy COMD FIRST WEEK -=- JANUARY TERM, 1949 iin oe atl Jit COURT ‘ ant a Wy € i ee \ATTT ADS, Merry: Tuesday, Februarv 2st ,1949 Haste T WEEK JANU my Rl 194.9 Tuesdav, February lst .14),9 ist ,191,9 PRI hry 7 aha au\d « iv! reaps 4 Judgment of the imprisoned in the less tnan THR view of the question of the defenda: sentence oT Y naan Pet en a mm naant enters a plea f Te 2 "2a ROANnNAD ln+ ~Y CONSOLIAa {veg , + }y } Poy qa, it the defendant 71 a3 ch Yr not hLOLi sk 2 OF LOU AY ‘ Vsicida I i I 1 i I ; ! ant, Le i nters a pl dant, William the trial the defendant, uilty of receiving. ; at of tue 0Otl iim, been given lefendant william Campbe}l jucg > tuadell souny advance, and that tiis advance.ent sontined in o.e Col jail of sre tl of the Clerk in the amount of not ai of THREE YlARS, assizned to WOrt ©’. on iss Calendar week until the whole thereol nas supervision of the State Highway and Public nor ment of + whomsoever micht advance this. he defend 4S to the defendant LeRoy McIntosh---, eee rredey 10t to be re sed until the whole thereof sourt is that he be confined in tiie c o1uion se ork unier has been paid. i vountv for a period of TIN MONTHS assigned Me fs forks If any of these conditions are breache vie Supervision of the State Highway and ublic « ue upon motion of the Solicitor to put Jommission, Sentence suspended. 2a Vs ntvers a eee ’ inh S 4 A » ry ? T ah ae ar ee LeRoy i.cinto and the cost, and tha i over by the WO U k under 4 A ian LALLY ys fiice or . en } aid, to nowever, . set out herein ; Japias to into effect tne PY THT IIPVOITHND A try 7 TT DWT rs ie aml N THE SUPERTOR COUR E SUPERIOR COURT 4’ titod Wy Uo UN pad JANUARY rrr M 19OL9 jo 7 ANU AW m 197 c luesday, February Ist, 67,4 a Pee £R LOLD : C vy, Hebdruarv 1st,1949 Ci T+ ‘ v ada bat V4 4a ‘Ss a plea ,0ourt is tha Iredell Count rk at tne County Home, rf aitisfactory ther =~ — ian A Am i a i man ABE Yo. 1271 State v 8 ?, Ae MeGuirt Ee eae : oe inet age. San ne it on all bil: ointed to in F 7 wince 2OY . ce following, reports: nome was inspected by a committee, ury, 1 inmates as follows nero 3 white prisoners, and no colored prisoners. Committee / em being \ in food 1ingss and frounds and found th snereain enka ;OURT HOUSE tions are breached, capias % : ence suspended. vommittee on court house and jail, C. H. Goodwin, chairman, and ace t} ~ Se follows n- sé aa MM. hieiness lowing report. Court house in excellent condition. The business i the County a i s i an = t Y Seems to be taken care of in a business like and /efficien ~~ wuep, p | ’ ro .2 ~ Cy 10 ‘ ma recent audit of the county manager's records by George *mory, “*rtifieg ; Public Accountant, the following statement was observed: "All the SaaS pao cece sae na i So Se a ab tnt hie € -e v10n Ol Us JAda =f ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK -= JANUARY TERM 1949 Tuesday, February 1st, 19h9 books and records of account were found to be in good condition and to revea] therein no evidence of any irregularities," The Jail as also inspected and the following was reported: ¢ white wad men prisoners, no white women, 14 colored men and 3 colored wome found in excellent condition having been recently painteéd on the inside, with block, which is now under contract. It was a) refrigerator has been purchased for keenine the lesomne condition. This is in accordane previous Grand Jury. examination of the ruardians and Justices of the of the Court is thi: common jail of Irede hway and Public works at the expiration of to run concurrent rmiation to the effe 4 Autnori ty to make in ashe vounty n lo) imposition of recess until Monday Morning February ‘™" 4 JUDGE PRESIDING pe Ne The jail wae IN TH# SUPERIOR Count SECOND WEEK == JANUARY TER}, 1949 jonday, February 7th, 19h9 yoRTH CAROLINA, Athen yeTT, COU oon) Titi th lls UUUiNS . Lite This Honorable Court convenes vonday, sorning, February 7th, 1949, vilson Warlick, Judge Presiding, de “Es Judicial District Spring Term, 191 D. Morrison, High oven Court the names of the foll ., al r this the second week of the ny «Vv l.orrison *} +7 snanaier The Divorce Jury answers the issu lobb ) _ itermarry as alleged in the complaint “had od Lui TES. 2 o 2 : : , | De, ‘1head euuewkes and apart from each other for two consecue pr Prior to the commencement of this action? AO wi at YES. Jar ic ’ ‘ » 2 : . hhine ar qd nd: be lies Dobbine =” Jid the plaintiff, Junious Dobbins, and the Jefendant, arlene ") $ Have the plaintiff, Junious Dobbins, and the defendant, sarlene ive years Has the plaintiff, Junious Dobbins, been a bona fide resident North Carolina for’ six months imuediately preceding the action? Pipette ANSWER YES, commence=- IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK = JANUARY TERM » L949 Monday, February 7th, 19h9 In the Superior Court January verm, 1949 cou.ing on to be heard, and being heard by His ‘ing, and a jury, at the January ‘Term, uperi North Carolina, and the following is: -wit: wereda JOOUDINS, > hh vner ¢ -~ acv1lon: Me . o —uifidavit ol the time of the sution of intiff and the etween the iintiff, Junious Dobbins, Dobbins, Let anciif. ay of Fel 1949. ruary, wilson | ~TJudge P Honor | Lor Court been IN THE SUPERIOR Court SECOND WEEK= JANUARY T rts, »L949 Monday, February 7th, 1949 DIVORCE | The | answers } Divorce Jur the issu Martha Lane berry wanmTuy 0 unin ¥v WtOL IN 4 py IREDELL COU ITY Berry the ‘te VS iil Son } } | wr . hartha Lane berry ylaintiff an oudli= coming Superior for undersj Llowing Po 1g indicated, aintiff and th answer: plaintiff and the defendant lived se i He ve the gears liumeadiately preceeding the comuencement of 4 ae i answer: 2siding- aa fas the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North “8roling is for more than one year next preceeding the commencement of tuis acti on? ‘Answer : adjudged and decreed, that the bonds of ordered, and the defendant be, and i t is, therefore, “8trimon, : Y heretofore existing between the plaintiff t they Y are hereby dis and he is hereby granted Solved and that the sooner be, Judge Presiding Absolut € divoree fren,the..defenda FP AR OK noe , IN THE SUPERIOR couRT IN THE SUPERTOR a SECOND WEEK = JANUARY TERL..1949 a be TOR C ? Pr sae QOUGOND WORK == JANUARY “onday, February 7th, 1949 lionday,February 7th OURT ’ TERM. 1946 19 9° ILO TVA YVIV Us spanelled answcry ire eine duly sworn and F yIVORCE Cupanelled answers the issues cuhm; ( an - : as follows: memes Submitted Bei ao. J answers ne U In the su erior Court i rown, ient of the 1nStitution Iredell Count : } coming on to be ige Presiding, lredell sounty, Nort! " ‘ Ve resident of the State o ae f North 4 ’ ) ) eG to and answered + the institution of this action? he plaintiff, lirs. sndant married as alleged in the orbie enn, 7OWn ntermarry as a.leged in v Yes + Cwve ted, and have they live ee ee , the laf; j- £ 14:74 ms ne defendant coumit adultery preceding the instituvirs a = the pi ai ntiff, l.rs e Effie We Brown, been I ona i 1ae nswered all] of said issues is, therefc : : that th state of North Carolina for six months im ediately pre- ve Mmeretore, by the Court ordered, adyudged and decreed tha 5 Comrie rH : ion? admit OMmiencement of this action? bonds of matri ke bine , ’ aS of matr imony iere tofore existing be tween the plaintiff and the defe ao yinculo be forever dissolved. and , — ‘ vveved, and the plaintiff is hereby rranted, a divorce « from the defendse al hi Lon ° the defendant Jessie Jswaney Jtonestreet, and that the cost of this or YO’ rad ae ha = . Ag pres axed against the plaintirr by the Clerk Wilson Warl ack, Jude? We 345 3< Sic 3 sesles s!e a! ste ates sie ste ste sie ste s'z gle ste 3'z sic 3k WO PR AS RB OS DS DR DA SE DK 5,5 D5 SS BS 3k 5,5 BS OS BS OS 3,5 FS p58 aS gS Oe ellis tea iw The GUPenhiGR CUURT SECOND WEEK -= JANUARY TERM. 1¢ vchdan Hele a londay, February 7th,1949 hat sumions in this action was q Ls ~ UL was dulv served J * ved on th ne ation in the Statesvi 1 cies es i Y Ui i1lshed ir ) i th Carolina, and that the Last publication of 4 4 . : Sum Ons lecember, LOL, and the Court Curt , : theme s that su: } ' . } ; GeLenaa»nt . 2 r Urole Le as Or 4 North Carol] ina, on th t a ri walt Sun Olly Me ee aa Foster, and the defendant, yhe complaint? ‘jorie Foster, lived in the otate pre@eding the comuencenent of this action? ) cs + oa ; . ; : , "4 ]liam plaintiff, j.arJorie roster, and the defendant, wil! the foster lived separate a; 1 Arne . ding pareve and apart from each other for two years preceedini commencement of this action? inswer. Yes IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -=— JANUARY TE: ,1949 hi North Ca rol ina jredell county varjorie Foster, a y her Next Iriena by Vs welltam A foster Willzam aA. ¢ , ointed Ley iresidain y tv JURY ) onday, February 7th, 1949 ] > nor » de te AVOry a sinor, by GUaAralan ee Plaintiff and “le Complaint. Answer, Yes, intermarry Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State more than one year next preceding t! e filings Jid the defendant separate from the plaintiff and have they alleged in lived the ¢ " Complaint» se c + e a ¢ Parte and apart for a period of two years or more as Answer, Yes Ov : = _ : = , Oo = < zi ri “" " “ON . , = gine ‘I b ‘ C e+ f= ON : fw ; mitre ar hy 4 Se « : oo | On.» a 3 ¢ “ mt a _ a ~~ f ? 4 > o > om a a 3 = Ee ‘ . . ; ’ + ; . nag a D> Oo ® : rms , Mes oO + G 5 i 5 . = be $, — $ ia on ‘ "© co & —§ + re) : - —) 12 i s3 = = - ‘. > e. Qt @ % oO 4 : 3 ; = G, ~ z = — + » 4 " 4 ° ee 4 BD 5 me a eS ey sc tJ rm ; ~ o ad 5 “4 nt - O or fx) a te =e a+ < t ‘ _ , = fp he 8 3 8 | 7 & 2 8 3 ; a a =~ - Va $ > » ; ° : ) b, > Es = ; c C a < 5 oS 2 re 4 . ; = ~~ a t ~ = . . . Hoes = s H 2 » ~ a. ; S © > co t+ . a : os = © — —< sow © / i) c? © “ 7 on a : s C - = ¢ = nD « Q to © he ‘ © es e ~ . = u S) o ® 6 &£€£ ese > Oo 5. = 5 oe he + ee cy c ) P . — 1 2 ime ; A - ; A : ; 1 , = M ; - be : q S “4 $ “ ? = 4 v - ; a“ ‘ * = iH a ” es se ; ” - t . eH = @ 464 ; - ; o ‘ : ond Pe | : ss a kas’ ’ 4 a > E+ ; : oS | . oO ait 3 . “i a : 20 ed oe 5 2 - =e a » > « 2 S > 7 ee — @ pa G4 rt ; } ra ox ~s : “~ mee o : each 2. - a . 4 : 5 Ss @ > [ma - : + oo : — & oO ; ; oS a Q Ss he oT > 4 ke 2 * Sia . > , ; Ss & = x a 3s « ; oo S 2. : @ : — mM ~. -- a r> — 2 : oO : ~ ; sf @ = - i = he oO “ : ; @ 2 <3 S ‘ = 3 a 5 > &-~ = @® ¢ GH 2 1 Z 3 & “4 . 3 4 : a ‘ > Pe 2 3 ‘S : 3 Ba ~ “4 on 2 ” 4 = > oO so os ae o =" ~ ' 4 . a > > a = oo 4 e 3 <1 + 2 © " ~ S “ws = > Oo dled a be oS co 4 . : 4 > . = i : Poy a a : Oo a = sa ee ss iter ae i am a) 3 } > ¢3 + a, o J ¢ > —<— @® ° . ¢ ~ 4} a - > ro] ON a . 4 > ’ 2 = : cc oo ‘ vie ' ’ —~ » — | . e ; par ~ ss : 2 - c toa ~_ = ey CG = ¢ : b a _ ' a } ‘ 3 q — = tt ~ ao ga 2 ’ c ~ O a Or => ¢ - c » 1 is F . ‘ —t A ~ 4 J r « a 3 CON DH a —_ OD w z . = ~ -t a “ ay ry c 1 “ » . a 4 of Bee ceed cr: a ef y , : . a = 8 — . rv? ¢. , o : " “Or Ee p> ' e = pa ) d » A : ‘ oe. = ; e . ; = > = a os . @ O Gy we 5 . : Sg ~~ “> “ — t a ~ * ~ e ) Bo = = & S : ea & te q 5S et Hi re “aH i : & 3 On = 5 a a I bP & § £2 . : o a S Sc wi a ) 5 S44 = = 2 —_— S35 ! ° Sr a w” + 4 > > = + e mot : . & = : 44 ; Ph Ox 2 oo oe oO a D ort = » oO mp 99} oo 3 9) © s - o wt 2 ~~ Oo -~ ' . " “i E “% — CS ¢ t = . : ; ~ Rs ® 9 = / a, ; ¢ + ‘ = e me a s3 oa = S o > AS ON . Se a oe mm 2p u 4 ? - ee 21.0 c -~ om 7 1.0 Ae ee ; + ¢ ms ; 2 fe, . = & c ng - a © = = - o a o = Ba 2 pt 5 5 " = as O° & = : C a= o = - - . bs eS aa, a 5 _— a. ™ ss pest ee =O - = @¢ 2 “ ; ; 5 EJ oa 5 s a2 = S) =e t > ~*~ : b f=} = : o « : + a i S Sy 3 > ba ; Z ; a ay . = lett eee eed tae ee 7 ‘ 4 Vv TY, ‘Tt 7 Ju: “> L 9 » a3 On =, ¢ es io« a cS 4 45 2K — ; yr 7 a on 1 1 Y 1 4 _ 1 h U hionday, Fe a5. 4 1 — > eo fr E+ &] — rH = _ O © > JOURT - ot: OR U SUPERIC re) IN TH WEEK ay IND iond ON + ON eo ‘T uh \ Aaa JAN whe Wl Seo 9 Vv 7th ) 19h, Februar) ’ ? 1 VU @- oO O.2 1 a ! > ‘ ne — oe 4 a= a a a 3 c. } a 0 > > * o a S o ao os E- oO =~ CO ei — Sed co O Oc a“ ay 0 oa Oo & ~ = Oy “4 S c9 r> rt ay 4 os 2 cL = A 5s <G ® ed 4 AE as - > E, ey Ju issue © © 4 © r+ 4 1 W hy a) 4 @ a = — = c+ ww) od So ee mo iers yun 9 @ C4 4 ™ > ) i rt r ” v2 a) a - 4 o* a . > { ba 4 < : oD 29 S Dv > ’ hy e > ‘ 4 5) 4 4 - + 4 4 ed 4 ee pease: a i > 0 . ; 2 9 Q ¢ + O i 4 “4 4 $, ) ** ‘ . ka + ~ > ‘ > = @ > ; re) S > ! 4 ‘ if , an > = > c @ c Ww = » re) l = ce 2 _ SS Sy ot » ) ¢ - M4 \ an ,OW L $4 x “ — — —_ c = -— = 2 G4 + Hw 9? & . DP & & > 2 @ aa o) » — = C 1 =) Oo » - — U2 = © ( = - c a ¢ : . B » oo oO $4 : eal Y ‘ — “—— ) ) a “4 C ‘ oe < . © Oo om ¢ ~" . ; r> oe et oO o 28. S re) 2. . : O S > “ ‘a “ ~ a on E C ® C re) 4 : f 4 b re £ > ~ > -~ > , - S cS Go e 74 G4 = D ~ oe-d cS ° ei . 0 » > : on o 7) G = hu ™ 3 ad 4 2 ° ; = a ; > 4 ? \ 3 fe 2 \ S gee og z ses “mere 4 ee Ae ~ eee ff waite — Pere eT one a x ~ i | } Bee - + came motes ape Se IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR Count SECOND WEEK -- JANUARY TERM,1949 SECOND WEEK oe. tan cOUR , 7 VEEK =~ 4 At mot ( ronday, February 7th, 1944 “Konday, February 7th, 1a;3re ’ 72 ‘ yas) r 4 - 4 , ¢ No. 4630 TVORCE NORTH CAROLINA my ne 7 5 co ~ Ya, ) The Divorce Jur l being duly sworn and enp- So aninan le vu y - - =e Ana el.panelled IREDELL COUNTY inswers the issues submitted to it as folloys: Sanuel Gates Jordan, by his next friend, j.abel Dean Jordan, T + > INAYS in tne wuperior January Tern, Plaintiff VS. ugene ... salker, warren . ialke Austin Billings, Defendants T ann Gli Ve coming on to uperior nis next “A a rom 7 LAW be best interest: a ie | ce iiieées such incompet 1 between the auto: herein complained of; ler appearing to the court Ounty, North Carolina, an and decreed by laintiff Said next friend; and etween the ;lainviil, Ts fr. ’ A - . : fia is ad +l turther apsearing to the court upon examination ol the witnesses i — ral 14solved ana AP; g h I same are hereby G15 a “id the a ee oo ee ae . eae ‘ Bo ee . ok: Pb { the jefendant. ~ next friend of the plaintiff that the nlaintiff and the next friend ]- “rf r) ¢ Let c divorce from tn an Oi the Plaintiff - ° 2 * ' . = t t nccent the sum nal resenvlil, who is his wife, fully and freely consen o accep he Wilson war wae ne | 5 I Si a v4 Oey m a is ? | 3 | | | Judge Pre d *n thousand, “ive Hundred, Seventy-five Dollars (.57575.00) in full Sett lem i ' ian ent and discharge of the plaintiff's cause of action against the Ant = lefendant « he circumsté ants, and the court finding as a fact that under all the circumstances lerein , ° +a the sum of 37575.00 is a fair, adecuate, and just compromise for the , ____IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN THE SUPERIOR court SECOND WEEK == JANUARY TERM,1949 SECOND WEEK == JANUARY TER. 1o,0 honday, February 7th, 1949 Monday, February 7th,1949 sustained by the plaintiff Samuel Gates Jordon, and that eis 4au § iwee f *¢ sun Ho. 4606 hereby sanctioned and approved by the court and the defend: h hereby con. orth Carolina, ay of compromise; and Iredell County. earing to the Court from the examination of the py] : He Plainti plaintiff that since and after December 23. ]o, ee’ &Iy LIK5, the gunch Funeral Home, Inc. Shite ee ee become obligated for certai loctor. hosne Vs. 4in aoctor, hospital Hilary Tillotson anc li, f, Gaitner. known to ca BS ie Sen he eden oct ndants sugene This cause coming Lnousand rive + perior Court of I: s Fg Renkin 5 Benes in Sina yilson warlick, Judge Presidin Tillotson, to dismiss tie acti AUS he ee A eee ie ne = ee oe ee ca sy 4 - Use coming on to rior Court upon and it appearins defendant did not retur ne answer ime to be file ; file, nor was it verified at the time it was vane answer now nr es . “ow proposed to be filed was not verified in the presence and the eaue ' ci ‘ . _ Ul) Court therefore finds as a fact that tne daelena: nt ending to his law suit and that he is not entitled at Mower, t is } ’ J } } i I is, therefore, ordered and decreed that the motion to the defend ndant : nt to file answer is denied. Wilson warlick Judge Presiding 9 uy L949 4 Y ary 7th, 19 r L fa m COUR 7 \ tr adh tLO; ANU/ 7 C ash J bru UP] a iw) ‘e ia jt i Fy Vet + 1 WL IN TI l.onday, SECOND OT TN 1 \LINA, 6h, AAD VAAL 30 WURTH NO. rior Court, UD On M194 1© tT londay, February 7th,1949 COU tY TER aah ' ) SUPERIOR JANU ! cw 6 Ps | A i bs ee pa ot a HF * IN ND VN yy Th ’ 194, 9 : Y 4 ruary |< 4 aton De c ~ Vv ad e se a4 ~ Po > - Col w“~ l 4 > ¢ . t, , * > ‘ Y ~ +> > : us $ . > rt r a 4 Cc ‘ 4 + é -” +e mH “2 Cc) : > ey £, ’ rt { 2 S - i i “~ 4 - + +2 a + ~« ~~ w > > > . . aa S we - “ S o = 4 : q ‘ ~ a = ae 5 ‘ 4 Gy . by ¢ . : : ° ~« he ° ° 1 ‘ ~ 4 “a Ss , ‘ $ . : 4 ra an : . : > ; . ~ ‘ > a ) ° ~ ° aad ~~ a ' : y ‘ { ‘ ° re} « %S 2 4 4 u ) : - + ua C4 > Oo rt ,0U the n: { ol “~ rc eel en Pia ae a es l.cDonald in this A r rt reacne minor 4 til tne u or ointed 7en Ol RT a) Y UPER y, Febru ‘ W 4 IN 1 I) O ’ EC t tICR COU JA} rT sh SUP}: IN THE OND WEEK Wi Monday, Webru i" WlbU vY RIOR 3 ws st eS r+ fe} Jiu tT , 4 UARY T \ f au Y TER? ary 7th,1949 pa a .ond On aa CON re Or ~t On ot G » ~~ > by it] au pai } funds the of out That F 4 Wt LOR nym iT VVUUiLt ve 4 nospl av1s Dollar: Night Forty and hic} minor's i anount al guriecs, n His services rencered tne ’ Bost ‘7 AY TIE ‘ 4 luring -urred MC JU! tT} Vile a) 4 a4 4 4 ~ me oo "2 r | a e) 4 + ret ount ) ‘ £ CALC Cc r) rer anuayr c 72) . wvw~ ~ 4 Su r4 C 4 i 4 ) ‘ ct SS > — ‘ 2 ” > ) r J “ 7 ’ 1 + ° , . & w @ ‘ rt t uw c. ha > c - ) C4 , H } “ 4 > cd Lr . . j o ‘ 3 > ¢ ) @ a G4 = oO ; > > C b 4 ma C ¢ 3 a $ § $ , c “A o eu 2 > > @ 3 onl S4 ? uo 2 © > 3 od ‘ re | ; ® Che . > > 4 8 z. a @ 4 i 5 i 4 - w > 3 ¢ ~~ ~ ~ x ~~ 4 2 > .. 7 4 . ro ~ MY , c? < S 2 L GS a _ 4 hy a a wn = ‘ + 4 + n 4 a . a a c a A ° o 49 4 4 M 42 ond i S = . " -4 So 2 @® ae wy) ) < < 1 + 4 + b 4 “~ 1 » “ » ad 4 < 5 q “ +7 > 4 ~ re 3 ; ner a ~ 20 . is 2 $4 S4 ‘ ied y 4 z ~ > i + a = io ru @ } > r- <a i i. < 4 ¢ . ae [rt ha . md ' 3 } — 4 , + ' ; ~~ | + ) % a - I ° j ‘ , i4 fn k = ”~ ' « i Sic a | ja « - o* a] fs : + 2 > > es 2 c = 2 4 ° - = 4 ® ot 4 wo ie co qa bo 4 “A i ba 3 = 2 ~ > ~ > Ss S oO p= 4 4 > = 4 7 £5 4 @ > ) + 4 4 a + MM - 4 fy ° 4 > 4 — > - -« s » ¢ wu~ mB ¢ ee G a) co oO a + a4 “ct a o- 4 . re © C4 4 - - > r . ~ - om , > CS 4 v ~ ~ t io > hy > ‘. ~ . = 4 ) > - x ~ a oO So © a4 ) : re . ron = “— > - ~ ~ ~ = . 2 rj = 7 5 4 > hy ~4 be + 4 ”- 4 < . “~ asvud no os AAA accids yourt iS t! Three G4 Oo = 3 n w 7 oe) Jefenda County. 1 tae , GU endants ri G4 fi © > ® oO Q OD ies ® v oC u& hs “of tH re) os . > GH Si oO } ,Ourt © “~ “ ‘ - —_ = 5 i oC “4 4 . S4 y JUD I 9 tT R194 Y TER ry 7th, 1949 r 4 OU n AR 0 JANUA SUPERIC WEEK <= Februe THE IN OND l.onday, “Ny Dis <=. Pa Se Pa Sa aaa ; = I re he ewe Pa Eng See bo A ee fe ete ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SECOND WEEK -- JANUARY TERM,1949 hionday, February 7th,1949 Buford Davidson vs. Annie Bell Davidson, Vontinued No. 459% Frankie Sue Hiilderbrand vs. Marvin Wesley Hilderbrand Continued North Carolina In the Superior Court toosvelt Saunders vs. Rosetta Saunders, Continued Iredell County ‘llie Brown dohnson vs. Charles W Johnson,---- Continued Butler Lumber Company J ret WV. itobinette,---- 2ontinued vs ] rrank Reba C look vs silliam onTinue R, Don Harris | This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant ; ; has failed to file his answer within the time prescribed, and that upon on joss notion before the Superior Court the right has been denied him. = ueanaai It is, therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff is entitled pene to judgment by default and inquiry on its pleadings. The cause is therefore transferred to the trial docket of the Superior Court for an inquiry as to the amount due by this defendant to the plaintiff. This the 7th day of February, 1949. C, G. Smith aes Clerk Superior court FERC AE He Re 6 ae a Bae ee ae a a ao atc ale ae alco ae oe ate NO. 4580 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY City of Statesville, a I tunbipgl Corporation. Plaintiff Vs. “spie Young and wife , Mrs. “spie Young: and ti of Iredel] nd the County ! | ! I Defendants This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the inersigned Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that Mis 48 an action for the foreclosure of the lien for taxes due the plaintiff "PON real estate described in the complaint, and it further appearing to the “ourt that Plaintiff, at the time of the institution of this action, filed ® duly verified Complaint setting out the amount of its tax lien against said = estate, and now files a proper certificate showing the amount of taxes Ly E PRESIDING mich are a lien on said property, as authorized by Section 1719 (g) of — actin c stale en SE eee: a Chapter 310, Public Laws of 1939 as amended; and it further jeing all of lot number 15 of the Flora B. Lewis property, as a )& Fi r Ppearing that mapped and platted by 'iedmont “ngineering Co. and recorded in Plat Book : thas a Hook ' ants nam nis action have been properly ; 1 at page 207 in the office of the Keglster of Veeds of Ired ’ all of the defendants named in th yee) Y Served wi No. . nce Lo] , . Peds of Iredel) County th North Carolina, reference to which man is hereby made for a fuller lescrips anner an he time required by law and it fy {on and for metes and bounds of the same aid being in ane wae summons in the manner and within t \ urther t20n . ieee © Paes eS 6 ina respects a part of the property conveyed to Flora b, Lewis by deed of Millie Pearson dated ; “ ‘ 91] and recorded in Pook 4&5 ¢ aga Gee a » the ne defendants, “spie Young and wife, Mrs. Es;4e } November 23, 19 (OOK &) at page 557 in the office of : ap} eari ng, that the e Oy , t foung filed register of Deeds for Iredelij C punty, North Ca ro] tha. J ice of the no answer, Jvenmrrer, or other pleading within the time allowed by law and \]] the right, title and interest of tie lefer ' i ° . ee ene derendant: ‘Sple Young : . e ‘ ’ } - JUNE that the time within which tie said defendants, “spie Young and Mrs, Es aan . i i : ple and wife, I.rs. Leple foung, in and to said real estate igs hereby barred and ’ y. might answer the complaint of the plaintiff has expired: and s i ss , ; ree. Se 4 further forever foreclosed, except as to their right to articipate in the dine appearing that the defendant, County of lredell has filed an answer in which ‘hution of any surplus that may result fron t) tribut a ~ pee a ile 3 Om Y ue Gale herein authorized, sue was raised and that sch answér did not seek to prevent the foreclosure It is further orlered and adjudred that Noel 4 * 0 , > ana aga. 4j,CQ Phat Noe de W thou: e be ale of the property hereinafter described in the complaint but prayed fJudrrert ‘ a ; , =a —_ : rr on and he is hereby appointed Commissioner to se}} iid real Late at publie ieclaring the lien of Iredell Count for taxes due it on said propert } ; as ° : Ys eeuperers we guction for cash to the highest bidder, at the Courthouse door in Iredell reserved and to be of equal dignity with the lien for taxes due the plaintif? ame ’ - ft ‘ nO" r nortirc t ¢ ae . : ; a county, after first posting notice of said it the Courthouse in Iredell {t is therefore, upon motion of Barron K. Grier, Attorney for the . thirty (30) days preceding on 4 bs sounty , for 4 iir ty 2 J says | recedin; Sf L1G, and also rivertj nj nce intiff, orjered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, city of Statesville A4anvil ’ i ’ BBVi. e week or four successive weeks in some newspaper published in Iredel] as a first and prior lien, except that Iredell County has a lien of equal ar . . . ia 4 pra 20th, : Y sounty, and said Commissioner shall sell said renal extate free ar +> nity, uron that par el or tract of real estate hereinafter described fro . ' ‘ . ; ¥, all encumbrances except the lien of such taxes ani spectal assessment : ’ » - 4 oe . ar bares thie iith interest, penalties and costs, for the following years az : : ; . is - » ’ are not a part of this jJudpment, and shall deliver a deed conveying said the f lowing amount ‘ : ; owas ; real estate in fee simple to the purchas i inject however to the jen - ane snarina?l °) © °2 co 08 @ere + « =F . y ‘ t 4 ? . . , i . : momen a an Speciai aboessments wnich are now # ilen 9 Ad I Gr fs Wha J LN 37 “NALTI S, TOTAL d Y 3 3 i i I i n i I} ty an . * said 20miission: r wil} , within tLiuree LAYS afte r hdca ally ane report there- of 06 the Court. "2 It is further ordered and adjudged that from the proceeds of the m @ . 4 € c 1 Lei? 3.98 S43 sale the “om = 299 . 4 er «os ' Pendant: / } | | ] ’ 99 5.20 was a& Jom j sioner shal 7 Pp 1y to tne 1 sintiftf ana to tne delendant y . a tly het 4 , Q e439 19/|, hed 3690 del ounty of T j } t “tine ’ . t i + ' : l, 87 vounty of Iredell, the amount of the taxes, penalties, inters nd cout slyl ) 20 ad fu vad . t ’ e ; | a © « f &} - anor 4 re : "23 1,00 ayuazed to be a lien upon said real estate, and the costs of this action, ) e| eO3 j 5 °° {ne diel ; : » ’ wncluding compensation to the commissioner in the amount of 5, of the wv ") Lae ’ ‘ . ‘ rurchase price of said real estate, and shall pay any surplus remaining { . an his hands inte (? : ¢ ‘ » defendants as tneir ‘thy : nands ito the fc distribution to the defendants a: ui + i Lorethner wit the cost: of this action. 4Our t or { Hi fy Aaweett dno 7 , A it, Vou snteregt may appoeg 4 is further ordered > ad juupred ; and decreed t..at tne lefendant, yY appear, r ’ ' he answer And this cause is re e C further orders. of Iredell, has a lien for taxes due it in the amount set forth int 1use is retained for fear " 4) erty hereinalt?: This the « pe reby. 19k9. filid by tre said County of Iredell ih this cause, upon the prop rty he 45 the 9th day of Feby, 1949 ceatesville, *” C. G. Smith City of state ’ Lark of the Superior Zourt } that said lien of the County of Iredell, is hereby preserved. | | - lien is located * ‘eseribed, of equal dignity with that of the plaintiff, That the real estate upon which this judgment is a Shitttnnebeeesscniennneiau scularly + 7 , 7 } ' ’ ¢ art vtatesviliec Townsiip, Iredell County, North Carolina, and is more Pp described as follows: No. 4490 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY. Dottie Lou Mills, Inc., | Plaintiff, Vs. | JUDGMENT Troy Whitehead Machinery Com- | pany, Inc., ; Defendant. i THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Jourt and the Court finding as a fact that the plaintiff and the defendant nave compromised and settled all matters in dispute between them; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by consent that this action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed, and the costs are taxed against the plaintiff. This 9 day of February, 1949. C. G. Smith Vlerk Superior Court, Iredell County. we consent: haymer & Kaymer Tetomneys Ter PIaL ‘eabsiisemninnianaianeenite Attorneys for Plaintiff. Tillett & Campbell Attorneys for Jefendant. Hee aie deste ae nic d]s ae ajc oc aie oie ake aie ale ake ae ahs of ae afe ik sic ole ae eaeahe afeage ae ae 2} 3% 3 NO. 4589 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. Motor Trucking Company, | Incorporated, ! Plaintiff, i Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT G & M Motor Transfer Company, Incorporated, | Defendant, | d This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before om“ signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carol llth day of February, 1949, on motion of Adams, Dearman and Winberry, At ‘or the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to = er ina, on this torneys Court: le That on October 12, 1948, the plaintiff filed a duly verified Complaint in the above entitled action, with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Tredell County. Qe That Summons was issued from this Court on October 12, 1948, to the Sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law. Je That the Summons was served on the defendant oy T. Z, Sherrill, Constable of Fallstown Township, Iredell County, on October 13, 1948, by leaving with the defendant a copy of the Summons, together with a copy of the Complaint. he That the time for the defendant to answer was not extended, and the time allowed by law for the defendant to answer has now elapsed, and no answer, demurrer, or other pleading or motion has been filed by the defendant. 5- That the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff demandes judg- ment against the defendant for Five Hundred Ninety-nine Vollars Fifty- three Cents ($599.53), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 19, 1948, until paid, and for cost upon the complaint filed, served, and to which no answer has been made by the defendant, IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, G & M Motor Transfer Company, Incorporated, Five Hundred Ninety-nine Dollars Fifty-three Cents (3599.53), together with Interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 19, 1948, until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the llth day of February, 1949. : c. G, Smith fi Tlerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. a 3 he fe se ae ae ae ae ae ie 33 2 SK I aK a AE a a 2 I AR < Le A eee eee No. 4628 North Carolina Iredell County Peoples Loan and Savings Bank against JUDGMENT N. F. Hall and wife Zlizabeth C Hall This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell, N. ©. and it appearing to the Court, that the Sumons in this action was served on both of the defendants on the eleventh of January, 1949 and that more than thirty days have elapsed and neither of the defendants nave filed any pleadings in the cause. It further appears to the Court that the action is based on a written contract, to-wit, a note, and that the amount is certain. The Court finds that the defendants executed and delivered to the Plaintiff their note for $2800 on Sept. the first, 1948 and that the same became due on October 31st, 1948, and is past due since that date with interest and that Plaintif? is entitled to judgment by default final for want of an answer. IT IS THSREFORE, decreed that the plaintiff, Peoples Loan and Savings Bank of Statesville, N. C. recover judgment from the defendants in the amount of Twenty-eight hundred dollars, with interest at 6% from October 3lst, 1948 until maid and they are taxed with the cost of the action. This February 12th, 1949. C. G. Smith sitaaiiiti @lerk of the Superior vou No. 4,36 ORTH CAROLINA pi | In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY. urs, F. B. Bunch, Sr., trading and doing business as Bunch Hatqer — Plaintiff, Vs. FINAL JUDGMENT neem ee nr » C. Church and Mrs. R. C. tlhe Ve (Edra May) Church, Vefendants, This cause coming on he anc : ” = to be heard, and being heard, before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, on this Friday, February 11, 1949, on motion of Adams,Dearman and sinberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, for judgment by default final, and it appearing to the Court: ole That summons was issued from this Court on November 28,1947, to the sheriff of Iredell County, and was returnable as provided by law, and an alias summons was issued from this Court on December 12 - Qn of Iredell County, and was returnable as That on November 28, 1947, the plaintiff filed a duly verified Complaint with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County demanding a sum certain in money due on a promissory note, a copy of which note was contained in the complaint, o3- That tie summons issued by this Court on November 2&, 1947, was served on the defendant, R, C, Church, by W. H. Shuford, Devuty Sheriff of Iredell vounty on December 1, 1947, by leaving with the defendant, R. C. Church, a “Opy of the Summons, together with a copy of the Complaint. ake That the summons issued by this Courton December 12, 1947, was served : the defendant , Mrs. R. C. (Edra May) Church, by W. H. Shuford, Jeputy *herift of Iredell County on December 12, 1947, by leaving with the defendant, ans, R, FR * ae °. (Edra May) Church, a copy of the summons, together with a copy of "Me Complaint, -5- That the time allowed for the defendants to plead has elapsed, and or the tim © has not been extended, and no answer, demurrer, other pleading, 0b ion has been filed by the defendants. vies QR SS SR OL SS Se That the plaintiff exhibited the promissory note sued on in this ACtion to the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the ¢ Ourt finds that thereis due on this note the sum of Two Thousand Four Hundred Se Vents five Dollars ($2,475.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six | per cent per annum from September 16, 1947, until paid. = T.at the note sued on in this action and exhibited to the Court has been marked that judgment tas been obtained thereon, and the same attached to this judgment. IT IS, THSREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREzD that the plaintiif recover of the defendants, R. C. Church and Mrs. R. C, (Edra lay) Chureh, the sum of Two Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-five Dollars ($2,475.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from September 16, 1947, until paid, together with the costs of tris action to be taxed by the clerk of Court. This Friday, February 11, 1949. ~ Ve G. Smith Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County. io. 4640 yoRTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERTOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY. BEFORE THE ©] CLERK, c, M. Coley, Plaintiff frm T Va" TV? mremM Vs. MOTION rOR JUDGMENT OF NON#SI rf tddie Mae Coley, Defendant. hi ause coming ’ nd ¢} , This,c & on to be heard, and the court being informed by 4 rne e aintif h \ ate ene 8, Bogle, Attorney for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff does not wi te : Yi © to ours is action further Said W. cS. Rae : : e pareae » and said W. S. Bogle, Attorney for plaintiff hereby makes motion that the Plaintiff, C. hi. Coley to take a judgment of Non-Suit, and be taxed with the cost of This the 23rd, day of Feby. 1949, uAARATT Wa VARULINA, .L COUNTY. Coley, Plaintiff Vs. hae Coley, Defendant. ini3, Cause coming heard, Ogle, Attorney for Plaintiff, the court finds as a fact upon said motion, tho . hat the plaintiff cow er . oy . . whe plaintiff, C. M, Coley, does not wish to pursue his a n any further. it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be of non-auit, and be taxed with the cost of the action. 23rd, day Feby, 1949. Se G. Smith a ee ae ee se Glerk Superior Court, Iredell County. 22 Lo 1 = ra 4 = 2 a el r> ) 2 2 E- - C4 R CO RT UPERIC v Qa N THE I > f- =» a ee > ©) —I 3 7 oO , a ‘ : ‘ aS mae Sort ta 2.5 re | C> bi. 42 “A c Oo o Y “A $. = a ""9 — yntruw Vaasa ou 42 ; o== —— <== + > Sg 2 $ a ° ) . Ss by : = re © > 7 ‘a M4 ( i & te % - 4 ® 5 Y ' eo = oO : - = ) . e@%.4 © & = 0 ; rs — ; j ° ; 4 S re wo 4 . o w 4 _— 4) . ‘ ; be ) oa . wt oe 2 4 ° ts » = > ¢ Se : = ee : a os 4 3 <> & ~ = £2 ; art 2. a Sy a ‘ » oO fF 2 . r> 63 © oO 4 nd Pe 2 > co ct : & ~ ae & ° Q 2B — 3 Y a es =I > ss «@ aa § ¢ a} o A A h$ Oo & “A oO & a 4 es a © 4 oO] Zz 4 a a = i 7D P & =! hs S4 @ = os bs 2 fm) > i 4 on I P| a * =o) o > 2 > » - a ° = cs 40 Oo “5 6 = f : Saal hs as a @ AY o ry — — . S wy as ® @ : : = Oo “ SS i > ® oO o ow a. “4 2 © ; - a es n - “i = & 3 72) 4 od ood aw t 3 - aA 5 3 S ® 5 ? “4 with be . 2 as aio e _ = G-ri lf ‘ » A. OD Ges ae . 4 > ~ _ © ; —— 5 . 0 -~ > 3 © $4 > : as SS mY t, Z = ¢, Ty 07) ‘ / ae eee e Cs - teers ? ; Bi I ae PE TE wD wrens et 3. _ od | " e Tiled ani was 1 L421 Com + U e 4 nat a veril t! ‘ ~ ourt o December, 1948, ra] + aay o +? S “4 be 4 C4 > 4 Gs , 2 ° 4 *: ‘ 2 = bs os @ <3 2 nn <3 @ > np > ° ~ re) o ” 2 4 r=) 3 og . + 4 n “i « oo 4 ot 4 ore S - ° c v oY G4 — @ ,2] 3 At hae VW Veale ” 4 rer +e mur ie t 4 aed fe) 42 ” » Ss GS ba ~~ “4 Oo > ry S > 2 » = . 9 x re) D > > $ rc ba 5 +2 D > N t S ny c v4 ot he >. = ba S ct oe +> ® ~ S o2. nt c G tS at ¢ rt o ; hi 5 >) r> > ¢ : , ~“s a4 - + ) = ; 4 4 i 3 4 > 4 7 e “4 ae ° bo ° © @ ) ¢) Cc a\ iant jef . ageilen ne ” os v3 ® rt “4 Ga » 7 n which she ns - v wi ima VLhit int that ° la ,OMD , v “~ + ¢ +4 O : Se ° ° “~4 © & = y a su nay ~ay contract bo 4 » © t ba } =} 3 ¢) ‘ ‘ @ 4 et 1 Be “oe ss oO from hereon + L + W) interes with , q ; @ , ‘ n~ 4 42 - 4 nel : ; ra 4 : : onl Os ’ ) ? . 3 . ; 4 - ‘ ¢ - 4 ¢ ta v e . ©) 3 rt 4 : a . : > 4 re ° ge , 3 vourt G. Smith eo eee erk ouperior . Ve C1 uy >) UnuUuel ae a AK ae 3K OK v6 ee a a a +a . bivo allmer inst e vw v -Cessi ey} eucc USe n 14 buacad jefe: the to OH “4 » “ct sbile in order that ; autor Sala to the titled n applied to the > rl v prop or 4 . Qn ale and the ¢ old, e © mned, > Conde a oe i@ Nay t od Sees oS > S oo) 5 . ¢ ' pcr - : re) $4 cH = Oo ice o so ¢ ° ° ao ot m : ne i Sa > nN - ~ o a - * @ nk & 4 SS 2 a & +» “4 , : Oo ca oa e e be “At = 4 or c> + GS o ° no e a = @l a » “Ss : — = | 2 apo + : : ® = : : 1 = es o 5 oy ° * oe . mS cols = te = a S : 18 ; > ; a 3B . a : . fe wt »~ = & : z- a = oS - Se as 3 = 3 2 rj * +2 ow +> D ? cd o s os = > G oO co 4 “et +) @ ? «> 4 £3 os @ os = q Q “a G u ‘ £ ° a oi & ' od an 3 “1 o-? ° oO “a G4 2 ort o oO @ 2 rs 42 °o a3 2 a : = G os o 2 s3 ca o ~ > bs . ‘ v=! - s = » 2. Oo os oO no Se ct © co bc . ° ‘oI : bo - et o 3 “4 ce e> $ re 3 ord “Ad & oH s S » 0 4 G4 o co os » co oO orf oot Oo Oo rs $4 DQ. < ) © 4 & | s “4 ss “A Q 4 re) h +» 3 o co RQ. GH § ond w ae} cs co S4 Pa > od ‘ o “4 a oO : > Oo a a o vy + > 6) 2) “cd rm) Cus 2 ) : >! — G ” Y o D ont = } @ oO “4 4 py @ ce) S 5. re oO ) a “ 3 ~ “ u os > | re) f $4 > e 4 2 cs oY 3 = C4 : c 4 ; 2 2 A E 3 oo = = . o G S > 4 wo uy Oo os -5 O © ee ee ae 2 + ow OO 3 . ) a Oo wnt wv ad B®) os re) r- ce eS Q > = > « ; 2 o ® Y pe ) ° a a a aa [5 Bo BU tt FP DD « 3 oe o - + S P 4 So > ] = ; oes » 4 u a ct oS oO Sy g¢ oO @ : $ : 2 2 & Ss a EH} oy ‘ 7 ~p = = o A O L S 4 » ‘ oo) cH oy Yn 7s) @ 1 a » 3 aa . . : - oe co : = 4 3 4 “ s <4 - s oO re o > . @ rs) 4 "” o 5 Se Q a hy 1 oO 3 G4 er > = Se “ Of a 2 e¢ 6 «#©& & et va - 9 ol So tC 3 D ‘al a ert ) ® oO rc Sy cS 0) ro ) a , Ss G4 S co o GH a) a ~ { $ mF cs > . a e o 2 3 ? S em Oo ~ - =f 6 a io. ; no $ o » —t <= af 2 S S rd Q G ta > @ s © _ - oS) o ce} 3 © as 2 4 rs) o 5 # at 5s @ § © ‘ SB @ 4 Pp 8 Oo 7 L8) _ - S . “d gl ‘= pe Sy ® t, ¢ - = “2 ce S Q v ° +4 - o - ° rd oe ° ~ oO ) o ° oD @ SSH SS od $3 oO oO ‘ } r> ( a - : ° » O . > ed $ $4 o “ p ha ~ c oO » 2 a3 > xg a) 3 y oO a a & » Oo a s ‘. rs @ * —_ o 3 o = 4 ~ 5 . ; ¢, 5 r “ “ Ss 2 a > Oo ad S a4 re) 4d CO Oo ts : “s : 2 eo © ; c a ot ‘ ' + ad ° j © $4 . oe a oe % a od n ~ a4 SS cs ” a ® p c } b, pi ‘ = = - = 3 9° S 4 ) { -_ = @ @ @ @ « 4% 8 a ¢ { wo © ® o 4 > 1) n e © on — a § re) » @ > Pc ve a ba a n 9 So re) wD c , fad . ‘ as a @ S 9° +2 ‘ ) 2 | + a 5 a a a oe ; < : a - rt sg . ) es 7 63 : D wo DQ y > Oo a : S A nn $e ct e, ° Q $ 4 2 2 a e © + CO 42 : ” ‘ ia 1 ‘ © ~ © S. q C, ‘ ee : C. 1 » ae | Sy ©) 4 e oO oul 4 fe oo o 3 2 -¢41 ° O = - _ o oS ca ; Pe) ‘ C 3 oO ) ~ S oO & 4 $4 , “<3 3 D “A o o Oo 5 3) C 4 4 ; S) r H s SA n $4 | “ DY 4) 0) on : = G Pd a8 : 5 Ss o4 & e ’ o Oo $ 3 o ' é = ~ = # were ee a =o en een oe oe NG St tng Seg ——— * es = Seer SS : ff {SS ee = — s ee a 7 ¥ = == oe ct ie see ee 3 Z Je? = a SS 2 ae ae gee rage ee eee = Se - a —— =e - 3 aa = enn Bar oe tinh ig OS Se eS = Fe Ses ea geet a a ee i es Se ee RE , Tae _ — ee ae a ao mepEePrae ———_—_[_[—[{_—$_[_[— ————— SSS a ——— or nn pererment oe > ae ya ~ 4 SA bee z O Aa ioe 3739 worth Carolina Ss . . jiort: uperior Vourt eran Church Iredell County vollins, dd >. Clodfelter ie ; , Wilbert Ungineering Lonpany, Plaintiff VOe Theatre Supply Company, Sryant e ; lefendant : de 23 14 3 a A sno + he *, individ y and as ixecutor of coming on to dé - fendant in the above entitled of Kobert A. Collier, oe ° ° y ‘ LU a + } } fr 6 rustee of the Holy Trinity Luthe court that the defen its account 1utnorize the ent f jud : — he fn we \ 1 2a al a mberser as xe irs i mberger, on res Crees, 86 suited at the cost of the nis the l Ag Umberger to an meta wnioe On Salad notes; Coming on to be at the Aucust 194¢ Term of Iredell Cause beings remanded t tne und ned Clerk further proceedings as proviced under Go on the Complaint, Answer and Reply filed herein ana iv ’ : . » ° ° } -“ Sues ff for vourt that this action was instituted plaintili Lor vse aft © Ql s Crainine ¥+*1 . 3 a ° ‘a s ranhway “AY he €Straining the defendant from closing an existing roadway over UI “ag of tl , i S55 hiail “ie defendant and that the defendant has proposed that said existing “MAY be elo Se 1d 1 nintiff croing 3 her Sed and another roadway be used by the plaintiff going into Ma, — « a4 t S, 4 = S ¢ b= +? - - pean hy 4 > yt C rs ~ ny P er GUUK 194.9 lhth O ‘. ord > ) > ‘ t on -. xs wae os + ‘ 4 © , rOu a a ms ma ct ' : ‘ — 4 ) “ 24-8 Ss « 4 { . ee ae 2 0 6 u . = £4 ” .~. = 355 © S P ) 3 y oS S S O ; ‘ ye ean et ° ° ; ow Fea Pe : , W ‘TE cs tt — : a = ‘ a = ) i w ; oO tc: Zz = ! o 3 EA 2 ¥ “ ; ? ) T ‘ 1 YW ai ay, hare + 2 - e 1 v red arore re hom a YU + ~~ S Ss 3 ’ : ; ; ’ : 2 @ @ ; : ; , G = ~ ° : > 4 . Q j 42> —- by ny) at co " — 7 oO S a > . > = ce hy » 3 ™ 7 ri — ? S, c 4 ra - > ee es n= ) <J Cc) “A “st @ co ‘ : +> me S = t Oo : és a a cd wo } ‘ *; , 4 =< FQ » . ae . - & a S : a : — . Es ra} es] 3 . @ za ‘ m4 © S & 3 i ee S > re 4 = 4 => 2 Pr. > -3 ; os > G @ : 2 i ‘ Pe ; ‘ . “ oS od > ; @ s 2 @ om : : 3 o ' £ 3 s : ; > Ss o &D o @ 43 t = “o = " 3 os oO wY Fis w ‘ > c a D > : oO SH : S cs ” ; <3 ; ‘ ao Sa - oO 3 =) re : st os ¢ a = QP i 5 2 5 rt £4 @ c ~ *r Cc U oO ap a > -~ ee Ps) @ q ; ? ; os w > ; ’ @ ° S @ w m2 oc gu ® e) + — a Q «ed £4 2 3 a : os » 2 t 3 oy t < c - . ; @ oO 9) S c & _ o ) ‘ a : ha os “4 “4 . Oo ni 4 “aa : <4 ‘ o GH " Se > ~ a * - = oO 4 ; 3 > .) } © ° i @ t) : * a S ) ms as oO a " ) i =&§ @ pp © & by , 5 a = » > ha cs ~ , ; iy ; n oO = D > . y oY . ef 2 & em @ 4 ; ; : S re > u Oo . oy oS ‘ ; : - sed Oo o &, - $. a 3 o o 5 ; : . cea Pe a3 : > C 2» 5 ct G4 : oO oc ee Oo is : $4 : — % f rs os X ; ) v Oo ° ba : =? ~ 4 > - : os o : 4 E . = - - = o = $ a4 t u { D a a) . ve ; ) - A y ff . : 1 » q ) ‘ ‘ ’ a 3 & , cS ; ro . t Oo @ @ O O -H ( ‘ : 5 ‘ A Ss | ee » Cy oO \ 4 v . ‘ a o xs i ~ @ - 4 = = m u & Oo apt C “a } +9 : 2} Gs > - = + — > rb) oon 2 2egs @ om & * , mM be JY " +7 : oO $ 0) < ) F . , S > © 3 ® > © Pe 42 > a & . oc & & DSH = 7) @ 1 s f 4 ; . 7 2? “= tat & 2 @ » Oo ® 4 ,. * a ©) @ ct) o > : e- . » -% wo ¢t y - 4 b ‘ e - o “S 4 S @ 4 C fy $ ‘ Oo OQ «x eo <1 a Oo ) - ‘ os $ : - c en 3 ~ o4 » co ~p GS a4 » 42 S ¢ > oO oe en re) ct Pe ‘ e v ve ¢ “ eg qt ) > : ~ SS ec q ne ~ ) . 5 - e oe i . , » oO G4 w 4 : 9 @ by ) ry ; ¢ . - - L ; i oe Ly +4 r Oo yh © * * 0 3 © : , ) : ‘ 4 1 4 bes l ® oO re) #9 ee a pes + oO 2 vi a" oO c 1 ¢ C oe > ¥ . ~ o ~ + S a a4 C i “rd ® on S f. b , { oo h Bes d o 2 3 -- S { 4 oO 4 ‘ » a] co) ( ~~ a ) ‘ - 3 os oD Par : 4 i oe ro ; = C : * ; e i 4 5 : cS S : c 7 s+ 2a.” COU e oO » » ¢ @ : = 13 > ol @ > GH oa ) ‘ » ba oo $ O ry e402" > 4 $2, A en ~ ) i ny ‘ 1 < Ss | oo ¢ j 4 a) -< @ ; 63 > = o S ‘ a ' ; “4 ~ @ —<- 3 D Ss Dv ‘ > i 4 G4 ¢ i ~ : Se ‘ Lud yt ’ Ante YwVMY ne a! © QO + Vv ass 94 4VUu i. sal + vO yu 4 - a +) ° D ? 42 ~ 4 +? : - ? 3 Ss a oO . : > ’ $ ro} ° “A Se S4 ® 3 ; Oo ha +? oO o < 4 ) > +2 2 > oO 4 voesada + To | rn “ACM i Ov > 4 Aw sv sr Col. av ys) + Mi ve vO vil€ John 2 eC oral e o WVI+> °o w ~ om 3 £4 eI * + Aury Vue 7 Superior ¥ Smith 0 , COlM o eh eSic>d 1 i A dee Morrison, De ocation ar Lnv Vv 7 Courte © ne » } uv t , your . Opnened G4 ~< ° = U @ Ee » iS S Ss @ ” @ @ cS Sy + P. i «2 dt “at rend a > 4 C ~ = > 7 oS ’ tx 5 Np +4 > eae rm, as ct mea GS J] © ea > pa Ur Hq i tht Th iy Juonaay ’ ss rvry A dg o 2 4 I RT COU LOLI LIOR On -t Or i GS » —t qo G oO ATT TT SUI tnd de Meaty? 4 will y ar oi ~Auae « Ce Oe Ss E4-t a aC = S id Oo = ‘ into open + v vour o » urn + Vv ‘ Vv Sheriff of Iredell ounty, re a yy vue BY ues v as ea V >eY ¢c . . it r ‘ tomy ’ Vw Superior and lawful i.en and women to ountv 4 A ’ Vw “ood A ourt, nette Od1L r ab Im aya 1t 1 y 4 5. Knig Lie S OSs Heo ~UUYYe “Add she re apes ron | Ad wd m my on to §& ling ‘ + wanwu ~ ’ a) a - 4 oo) ) +> a4 “4 . c r 4 bs ; ~ el » 42 “~ ¢ 4 r> m rx . re 4 2 cg 5 4 3 »Y Ss ss “A oA ron > wn 4 ® Sa oO ° > fom ea “) oA ord S4 > $4 ‘ a) 4 > . . ; . . ’ ¥ ¢ te a4 - ® © . FF ie) h4 he oO na . 7 e > ™ r~ rd MS Oo t SH od ro vA "ec + u rn? Jooley ar + as View e re Ve 42 erine ¢ yy) "4 ee me a amhe . > i 4 ‘ ‘ o S : \ cq » ° “a 4 @ : nal - 4 Pe) by ¢ ri 5 . bu 4 - < a4 » 2 ; . S oa) S. “4 by 1 Pc = ; > i os 3 G4 ; ‘ oO | o oO 4 4 null c S 42 Oo i ) ; l C3 ee es A ee : Pe ( ¢ t, ° o Oo ° w) G4 QO S » © - . mH » Ss : +> by ° ; 2 7 } - 2 . cS ° : — 3 © - 2 i co 43 = 3 a : : . Ss @ > } —4 ol a Ss , 4 Se . . + me ‘ S & ; os 4 : ao ‘ 4 4 ‘ 3 ‘ 1 S EB m s > 4 + > so : ; ° ® > a t ‘ r> t <3 oC @ ® » 2 4 > > ~ o rq C = ) “ n “ <4 2 ec > 3 : = »4 : bi { } . : > > ct al 4 ri 4 + a ‘ cS “A c 1 5 » < h S Y “4 @ rl C ¢ D4 2 > SS ® 4 4 co - A a » © : Se. a — ~ . > a Cc, a, = €: » . Ma @ Oo ) Cod & cy Ci r ~ - a = o Sli o > 3 » » $ 2 : co oO by @ fe SS ? =) S4 > 7 c Y 4 , i ‘ “s 2 i : 1Q 3 ‘ 3 -" ae “ ol ee ah eclet iee Tt o thé n+ aay oS peri € ore t neo A he rece ext wae n x months ix lan 7? “ s ir pia the filing of this vom ‘ecedins > LES. vw cA a =) > o IC > ~ > I arch ith, 1949 ~ -——~ ~*~ 3 > 4.05 i £4 — fx] & oh : - se me ry 4 a += ATV u ical IN TI > 3 re e ° RIOR COURT 1949 "2 ch l4th, 1919 UP] 7 PP dot , ‘ ws = 4 — i] GO a Lo a Fis Se ee -24 + < en ao UV Lam S os NOe« Vani Jury Mou 4 Jivorce the =] i) oy 24 0 IH = aoa mM > 1) rd ~~ ar “A > aA = s = 9 ) 4 Jiu Jy di, 1s i) nr smu se0L0 fi 4 ee oe Sturrilil cP Y a = => co M4 ae WH 2> 9 ce i € a o= > oc 3 > 3 2 I os wl fs “4 7 e+ oso 5 oe f= 3 > sS re S $ + @ O~ £4 4 sd @ ba af MD "rs e~ c=} ~<« "= ‘Oo « S4 ro) os 5 =) 1 @ “4 » ? +) _ + ry a e ~ Sd C> - 2 5) “~ t ¢ > hy ct | a ® oO Q om a ” oS « & oe - 4 ial ‘ C o ; - a4 ; oO ra e G4 amd ae Y ow ® Ad _ Q « oO » P ss — S ) Oo cy an ~~? + r 4 " 4 Q) : “ Oo © ey c i were tne is tne +e tne asl To 120105 ee On, ” ’ ee, ~9Y ael e + uv Yr? + U Adasen irins » @ ow oc 4 Nid iren, 4 + L 4 ¢ € i lefs a bon heard pe '@) peen 1 preceding the bringing ff rn > 77 Lad owing 1 Y W SF eo r e bd. Co tur ww Yr) , hea ‘Ury, and the f in the Ne) an ~ x ext n + _ ey o Oo @ & Na oad > IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1949 tonday, March 14th,1949 IN THE SUPERIOR coypr _ MARCH TERK, 1949 Monday, March 14th, 1949 - 9 It is therefore, on motion of Burke & Burke, Attorneys f or ints ome Ga , aes plaintige, ORTH CAROLINA TN THR Stewhrrs pace sidered, ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony axist3 Sa ia Tene 5 consic » ox y ting between IREDELL COUNTY MARCH, 1949. top os : Ian Oe : ; 7y U the plaintiff and defendant, and the same are hereby dissolved, and that the y a s ee i ; a . Carson ii plaintiff be, and she 18 hereby granted an absolute divorce, thelma H. vars | Bi tH , ; ‘ pie Vs. | JUDGENT OF At i ke i dae Ms. | it aopearing to the Court, and the Court finding as a fact that the 7 _ * VP ADOULUTE DIV i We? {Abe O ; — as 5 : eae hf $ o S ‘ a . . ay . ° Ze my W. Carson . | Mia Wi a plaintiff, the mother of Clyde Neal Sturgill has had the care and custody of +». Theodore Ww ! RR ee ee ae oP ; ) } it bal» a ad a ° ° } . i ree Ti said tld, Clyd al Sturgill since the separation of plaintif 1 defend ' | ena iis at said child, vlyce heal oturs S separa 1 plaintiff and defendant This cause coming on to be heard at the peeyiay , ae — 14 bie , : week ’ 'y Tern of al nat Julia Lae Sturgill is a suitable and proper person to wh Wh Aas a ee ” ' i i and that Julia lae st 4 prot} p n to nave the care ap: Suverior Court for Iredell County, North Jarolin: : . | | . : ; ‘ — - co oe in efore the \ 2 t id n hild, it is therefore consi > dered and aaa : . . ee : id CuSvtoa OL UV Sal minor cC il ? t € Oo siaerea, Oraered and ad sud-ed undersigned Judge presiding and a jury and th a oni it : ee : —? . ere e follow. r i ae she be. and she is hereby given the custody of the said child. Clyde Nea) a; pee i ; b::atv sne DO, anc Sne@ 2a 1€ reod\ & i) y € al Cc ] ’ Clyde heal ing issues as indicated, and as appe ars in ie one ; , ae ra i | wer ess 1. Did t..e plaintiff and the defendant intormas i j aay ae LMHUCY Y c complaint? Answer; . ™ | complaint Mi i+) ” laintirf r ‘iP 2. Have the plaintiff and the de bf 1% ‘ sic ate sic 3 Bie 3) ac REDS ae aC sic Ne NE aie aie ake ate sic ac 2} < ¥ t id NE ei } j rate , “ a) i te ‘ : ss 1 ‘ for two years lilu.cdlateiy preceedin the com:.enc: nt p 4 nae ? Answer: tM e laintiff y Pi l ‘enemy i Je c v taintiil n esid t i t € ° arson { ‘| | 7 r or Y ae } ~ 4 a © cane oe Gawd = fas anita : anna’ Vs ore t Ad ar next preceeain wet Ce ‘ + i bf ° i The Jivorce Jury 1" being duly swor nd empanelled ; ie f ans swers the issues submitted to it as follows bene daar eat Sarre se ee ere ee ee: ee Gate a2 eee et oe Cc ct o > ; ssmead be the \. Was born to the plaintiff and znd the defendant intermarry as alleged in te born children are now and since tie : } are L4in + ¥ + } . . = : eee separate en “veds AQ tne iefendant have been re t t + C la n Cf C ian C j 1lOuUSLY Lived se poe re Soom 4a aave \ 4h 4 4 4 4 ha + ’ ’ - ave the plaintiff and the defendant continuous.) ~ — gan’ ae Lurt roa mOaYrin- +} Yea) P + + . . 92 ’ . at tnis action: 4 vu i 4 Caliil to tne Vourt 1 ¢ t i ; preceedine the commencement oi: Of answer: ’ line ior a Said Cr il lrey 9nd th . ° + } + + + ¢ ‘ > ren tha ti.ev ‘ . a: os Ce ota N h Caroline - 4fen and that 1t is to tne best interest ] a Chisvren Liab Liiey Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North © Ww . . San? ustody oi thei mothe he plaintiff nerein; and more than one vear next vreccedine the com.encenent of this action: 2 ir motn r, th Lainvuilidl I n; ’ y a, i u "+ 4 ner appearing to the Court and the Court finding as a iact thar “© defendant herein should contribute to the support of Saiu Ciisaren per month. : 4 . > a . : .a aim of Bp. Contribution from him at this time is the sum of %h0. i be > oS , a he Cour ‘ } S therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the Th nF ‘ ~ . : — 1 %5 qQY » -helma H. Carson be and she is hereby granted full and “St0d 1 on ¢ icin a V a rs Y and control of the minor children, Thomas \. Carson and Vance ® “PS on ‘ a 8 nd adjudged Until further order of this Court and it is further ordered and ad, +t t} cuit m Jarson ie defendant , Theodore W. Carson pay to the plaintiff, Thelma = Were IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERN,1949 Monday, Marcg 14th,1949 for the use and benefit of said children, the sum of 40.00 per mont) ; MUA, degin:. ing April 1, 1949. It is further ordered and adjucuged that the defendant be taxed y; With the ue cost of this action. This the 14 day of March, 1949. Luther Hamilton udge Presi ing 1 } ° . 74 9 1" being duly sworn and ennanelled submitted to it as follows: senarate for IN THE SUPERIOR CouR' MARCH Teh: 19,9008 Monday, March’14, “1919 7 jorth Carolina, Iredell County. Issie Me Pruitt Vs. Loyd U. Pruitt This cause coming on to be heard and t nese verm ol tne juverior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina lamilton, Judge Presiding, and a jury, issues Submitted to it by the Court in -he defendant as set ou* in the record: It is, therefore, ordered, ad judzed natrimony heretofore existing between t uU dissolved, set aside, and rendered nul] +4 ‘ } 7 15 an Fa rn 3 an absolute divorce from the defendant ive Pad undersigned was called by the non=cuited, and plaintiff failed and decreed that thi is hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with This 1 4021S the 14 day or March, 1949. Luther Hamilton JUDGE PABOLUS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ce MARCH TERM, 1949 IN, THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday, March 14th,1949 term, 194 ’ » 1945 Monday, hareh’ 1th’ 1949 No. 3897 No. L167 a : ne verth Carolina . North Carolina, In the Sunerior Court North Var ’ In the Superior ’ + vw, Iredell County. Iredell County Robert L. Bryant Albert Earl Jones gat & Vs. Norma Gibbs Hiley Jones et pial ST ng Raat a ~ Sr e SES O mz a This cause coming on for trial Sense wes Yan eal +h ace Wie _ at the aforesaid Tern of Iredell Sune ‘ iat owen td . 3 uperior Court before the undersimed Jyi- nd undersigned Judge, and it appearing to the Court that tis ihe immed Judre, an to the Court that the plaintiff was called by the Sherirf 4ilt *} e ee re 2 AMeA ° na yr inute y ee teas Sheriff to come in and prosecute this notion or he | action or she would be non-suited a ela ate sce: icin cient dias “iliac ; end it it appearing that the plaintiff failed and nerlecteg +, , ; - Mw WY sa failed and neglected to apnear and adtion: . It is therefore ordered, adj dered, sane is hereby dismissed, and This the 14 day of March, 191 + “aS cause coming on for trial at th a Terr. of Iredell Superior UWerior Court hes Ten Y mtorr Court before the undersigned Judze ; * . ’ i at nh nD? * and apnear to tne - “QU the Plaintiere wae : a ; ko md it ay r t AANUIiL was called by the Sheri Oo come in a rosecute tiis Sess Ke SE. } id b sass come j rnd nrose is acti or she wouid “Cvl0n or sh ee E ea Ee ee aoe come in and prosecute tnis action or she would be non-suited, and it appearing tha ne plaintiff failed » om eel ; ms 1 : . . : 9 ad to apped ald neslean , earir hat the plz ¢ od and neclected Vi Neglecte os ‘ t the plaintiff failed an E4ected to and prosecute this action: prosecute this action: 18 is thare? : : ; :, ws » 48 therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that tnis action be, i ie he * no enel ; ° . 14 ee be aii a!) } a t is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action ®* ~ °atie iS hereby dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with the costs. bid wo ’ rk I I C oo AAC \ Li ti costs. j hereby dieanicesd sana i ; top 2 al s+} ' ™, 2 ; +S nerevy dismissed, and the plaintiff is taxed with tue “fis the 14 day of March, 1949. li, day ag A: 5 cach Head + day of larch, 1949. Luther Hamilton luther “2 JUDGE PAOLDING Luther Tanestne UDGE PRito v mio ad sc > ve ste sic x! c esiesves . s' «ste ve ses . BHR DK HE HK Be Dik Dic 3Ye 2} a1e dhe aie afc sie oie aie afc aie aXe aie oie 3 MARC! M 9 ARC ERM, 19h honday, March’ 14th,1949 ionday, Larch’ 14th, i919 No. 3381 vo. 459 *Y , , 2 : WAT 1 CARY 1A 7 } ¢ North Carolina, In the Superior NORTH CAROLII In the Sun: [REDELL OUNTY March Term rior Court Iredell County. ; \. Campbell cutler Lumber Company, Inc. Le YA bell Ty | 7 Jury Sworn and eripanelled as fo] lows: ve, saiipbvell i uch I Y Ly I “ Steate VSe 4 an 1 ’ y er - * * 2 yer amneae DR } ’ 2. ae erye, valieS B. Johnston, Ross 2, Don Harris 24AUGE Le Gilbe ro, He L. waldr Baas tonilin, IP, anc we tse iWe c sankey Gaither ause comin: on for trial at the aforesaid Term of Iredell Suner; + « ca“ de ot undersigned Judre, and it appearing to the Court pao ot Ree ok eerie dels Wnat amount, if answere PIA IV marines that the plaintiff failec djiudged and decreed that this plaintiff is taxed with tile mT . : srr re that the piaintiff recover % } awa r he nis action to be taxed by t Luther Hamilton —-— Presiding : e | ion . is } b] . aa - , a . ES “**-45 Nonorapole court takes a recess until Tuesday Lorning, 2 v 7330 Ot eilaap Vw wSAUUCA« rior Court, Supe ae OM ae March Tern, We Ke Smith vs Vernon Fisher he . f the what amount, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover . defendant as alleged in his complaint? Answer 5179.15 Brown n~ . o > S > S » ee] - “At S > oc and - a ha °c HWS < Oo o Su oO o @ f~ ba ©> a > — : oN cS & © Oo —t co ma es os LN os out » —t SS @ @ + = > =? “4 <tc - be @ rm] = °o oO Sa cS} 3 = = = rot -< $ > a D : » »~ Ps 2S + s 3 2 = > os Ses 3 @ a 8 5 S 3 i: 3 & 4 64 c co e — oO G4 G4 Ca Pe ‘ ‘ “4 o oe - oO “” hb » be CO oo 4 ® S ® o & Se o > “A > o 7 e oy = 2 4 = 2 ox . - 3 > oO H ° = on ~ a : Qa 42 ® 2, 2 = c “ 2 ca YO @® a © 4 4 he , » 5 a ° Q MS 2s < . an | » ~ > 5 me mk ; 5S S es r s +o ? cc “a CT G4 ao _ - ~ ane ‘, 5 a 3 oe cS ‘2 @ fe, \ ; be = 2 tn “S.. ‘ + = - 3 se = S 2 © 2 2 ss 8 9 Re - » oO a Oo aa a cs§ a 2 Oo v S Pe) oO ot & - be ~~ S ® Ss O 3 3 yy & 2 o o t o o 5 = 5 a ‘ © <a eS + p = 2 <2 ; 3 es “ a o> OV 2) . i = ti 3 3. = o o ul = =o o + # © ‘ by rf @ © Ot a Ss —_ z =< - 4 p & oO OOS “d Py A ® > ail = = rp SD ros} 4 uf “4 @ @ cm WN oad * * | ® o S SH Oo ei oO SZ S Ss 3 “ Hos oO > 7 2 OG aaah © ‘ C | S = fapeo a 7 = f Es 7 4.69 & 2p > “8 s 2 aes o < | C rs) UO = ny = © d %O a ce) a9 o naes o © ! 4 GS “A o Q o Mo a o 5 bd 3 pe : wl 3 “a sett; Ss = - | o E oo 6 - Sof , * FI " =o oO + S 4 ord ‘ a , a nn as o x q 8. 3 b z er) oO ; pe | 4 CH oS » © 3 > oO sé ® +4 © 4 Ss e cet ® se ri] { “4 G4 co G4 = — 4 ~» ~ D > “d Co ord Oo: = : oa = 3 c eS © =) wv eo ik rc fee =e © * 3 @ c cS > G4 » o © . ® { 2 bu s @ S a, ‘i, «& 4 7 a o ss a *~ »? wo Oo * Oo oO On § @ D ) o ; ® & S be 5 2 SC ro] re : @ oO > = 4 » + C ~™® » 4 re} ee 6 *~ » o » Se @ — ae ¢ 4 ee 5 1 oe C ee o < ee co ee - = % © i ws 2 6 i’ @ at «& 4 a > ° $2 Su on . re) 1 @ i= @ o 7. Oe g x : : = o s&s z “4 4 4s cr é “ . o cS a a cS 7] n en * > 4 + : * g . s3 . ¢ ° S ° » S ° S E 4 ” + 2 ™ a | ” » 5 D j - ‘ 2 << LN << SS S * +2 i * > ” . S Ce » e x al Q x ‘ e 2 » wa G4 wy . Se * 4 . 2 » ) = ca ot ‘ ee 5 wow se ww | O® G q 6 wd ‘ 3 5 = x . ¥ 3 © a : , = 4 a b} - ° : a ‘ “2 o 4 Es st Sd x ; : 4 : ~ Ss 4 5 a4 Se sé » ~*~ e c. G4 ’ oul a x a a °e "4 “4 . ° . @ 2 @ | wl : — 2 bb £ 4 0m r4 = ~ os a ee Awe ) IN THe SUPERIOR COU: ARCH TER, 1949 aN ae ee jednesday, arch 16th,1949 uineR Meare SOURT ES usilu ty UY, 9L9 thursday, March '17th,1949 M.43 linn 2} | fy + Ye Nv > CCC “di - AQ ic YMA , 7 y . Y This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment wednesday This Honorable Court convenes pa | Naa ie y ) 6:30 O'e) } : ‘ i lorning, lareh lL th, 194 ay yisg CU LOCKe -orning ; Larch 17th, 1949 at 9:30 a en ors gre SY Scala iter acre wie Di cts ci mre inarch 7 Ft en it lame late ic , ; . : ‘heared at ning, ° sige i. H. ] lie Le: \ ‘nme thorpeafter able Court takes a recess until Thursday “or ' i ne Court therealtel “Lean and submitted issues tender the Jury having answ and the having answered tne a \ ihle ) 30) j ‘ ‘ . ‘ r j ne ec wcll Ss o% arainst the plaintiff as appear in the record. at PRES ) A JUDGE pRESII It ic P , 6 1S therefore, adjudged and decreed that tne action be and the sam s 0 Se d and that the plaintiff recover nothing of the defendants. Pistesasaa » : ““Sintiff is taxed with the cost of the action. Luther Hamilton, Judge Presiding 008 ee te ate ate ste ste @ ate vic sevice He she Be She BIS 34k 2k HENS AE AK EAE A ~ OF) 1. w-s a «& re + me << = W <= he Hs -< c ce R COURT 1949 y, larch 17th,1949 oe SUPERIO TuRl 4 CH MAR ursday IN THi n aa my ~OLINA Y i CA H RT 1/ ’ 0 1 4 an mary COUN 7 DELL 7 aM Abas QD I COURT ¢ asd LUT \TY, ouUP IN THE ! ;almons WC C Ae DQ De 1919 H TERI nA nC MA NI ’ Jiu JUL Vs. This cause comings Parks Wooten to n oO rresiding , 1+ bide ire Juda bon, ricai Lutnaer L ana : al Ca } ca ana county ell vex e a) 4 ourt of I ’ Vv unaers ore the b MA he oe on - + Vuad mu Rey w ~Vsiie PrP aArd ”) a“ 1 wo Ps s @ GH @ “=a © 4 ° > 9 nn rd $4 Oo 4 ; at 4 ne) , ha Ve sas a tis Qvi5l1eC0 JuUiLL . rt + . ,OU e tnat en . 241 Ol ge 4 one-hal wyawe ca b, 7 4 r4 “ «~ » 4) bh. Sy < ) G4 a 4 45 a ee » t& 4 “4 . 4 : ; 4 > 3 “4 ct o~4 62. ® ourt . erior q mistrial ordered. a and wn a < ir with: is 7 Me D » & eee ee Sn Oe ae ae =e pe E Sue aos ak ieee ose Pee Pasa pe ea a NOS NE “ No. 4553 North Carolina Tredell County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 194.9 N THE SUPERIOR Thursday, March 17th,1949 ) Aft Ti 4 1 car 11} srl ¢ he ’ > Thursday, l.arch 1" + In the Superior A I ’ m ¥ Ourt arch Term, 1949 J. Johnston, Ben 3. Houston }.. Norman, &. L. J. D. Beam and dW. Gudger Pp, Kerr, lh.ooresville R. von Nyy ite 4 Misty _ Ls tne six named plaintiffs, no other vlaintiff shall be entitled to maint action under Re dissolved. 36 the Clerk of 14s Cause hiller, a Dishman, Plaintili SO=Ope Harris, ovecretary on to be heard at the larch Tern, 1949 of Iredell) rerularly scheduled for trial at the said ter: e Yresiding. lied for trial and it was sti d by counsel for defendant that both sides waived right to trial by: ed that the court the evidence to for trial and the defendant, tirouzh counsel, 2o-operative ing fé corporation, organized of North Carolina while never ot no one stockholder shall + ° : : e ahov eferred 7 than the said plaintiffs above rel : inion ane 1 the foreroine facts the court 15 of the op of law: : she stock © That upon tie tendering and delivery of the six shares of ain this the pleadings, That +} » should That the tesporary restraining order heretofore granted 4 bY o be taxe’ ” That the defendant should pay the cost of this action t Luther Hamiltop udge Presiding 36 3K 315 3K aie she ate ix aN ate ale s'¢ ate ate ate ate vie ale ale ale ale sie ale ste aie ate ale ale sie ae se sic 36 x OU PH EIR BRO FR BE OK HE SK DIE SiC DIE Be DIK ac Dic BE Me Bic Be Bie Mai 3/6 346 346 Bic die 2s 35 He 3K HS this court, 2 2 Oe ee ae eee Di ey * ; 4 | <r ; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1949 Thursday, March 17th,1949 Frankie Sue Hilderbrand vs. l.arvin Wesley Hilderbrand, Continued by consent Reba C Cook vs. William Thomas Cook, ----- Continued by consent Thomas }.. Davidson vs. F 4 oifford, --- Continued for plaintiff T F \estmoreland vs. W K omith--- Continued by consent Bunch Funeral Home vs. Hilary Tillotson al,---- Continued by consent Cc Johnston et al vs. Harmon Gillespie et al, --- Continued by con Sent , oanuel C Cline, ---- Continued for defendant Duke Power Co al consent use beins motion of the to custody f Fifty aintenance } ; > h eum hei support of the boys, one-half of such sum bein up} ; +47 oach bov attains the age of such payments ahall continue until each boy at vdltians yer , ains the are of “ears, but shall cease as to that boy when he attains tne ¢ years > er ct ct lt is further Urdered, Adjudged and Decreed that the tiff under the judguent entered by the court at the ifty Dollars per month for the support of the boys while they 5 “3.97 LU DAL +n ¥ VY amron T+ ta f av i A uA uw ¢ 4 . isr ana + / ° vex y Pp yt . rT ,e ss rn . « Yr tN} Al ( lal . . ) ¢ y ice . 4 odd <4 + € he Larch,194,9 his Mare} ' ve. Armstron this Larch 5th, 1949, Frank bie Stee Fite on eid sum of Your Hundred Dollars to the defendant rther Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed, that either party to th; “eStraininys Urder issued by the Court in o . 243 ’ a +. 2 2 dered efore, with the consent of the plaintiff, or ’ > Obligation of aurust, 1946, na nich obligation he is in arrears, shall be com laintiff payins to the defendant the sum of ‘our Iundred 4 Hundred T paid on or before larch, 1,19/.9; and the court hereby ) urs, or before said date. Valdo wt -] , anniv 5 th our a Wee Dae ee ae i re gnt to apply to the court to modif: o1 change this ore wnte f } y Wa a “ mast i ie ts tn , . unts to be raid for support and maintenance of the pov: tne boys, jp, tn tha At? a . a+ ancl he +} nar +h a } pice to the otner party, and by showing the court that Stantial chanse in the circumstances 1ick ill just J if cna 2 pray tor, op. 1ese purposes, ¢t cause is retain + > Yay et & Uiit sUU ve 4+ - LULIIET Litvon — ‘ birt e nt , , — 1 Tf. I Ci ailve + on at . rt In the ouperior vVoury ; a { my? VTNG > 1 Wu Vit i wV IN a sled dve 7 + “9 ao Awe 7 k i . » nt he ne O ? ei ened resiaenl in : ieard before the undersi7nea re locates, « . > oe), Yasiy r 158 > wi 1 Ju + ] istrict, in 1 ich lreaeli ,OUTLLY 4 porary Nestraining Urder herein should be vace and he 1st this cause on % and the same is hereby vacated and set aside oO Residen Judicial District ft jorth Carolina, Iredell County. LTS e De Smith, Lowrance next Friend, Mrs. 7 0, 1 ¢ Lowrance and wife, Beulah | Je e Lowrance, wife, £112 ab the Superior Court on 1. “OWrance a wd ey ae ent, shall TT ae “9ePtine a 2 ‘ v ek, B. Rufty and in nin betty 1 ~~ ° + ~ he ' 1a wil 1 rSe +y in t t ne n tails /«@ . « wulty and wile, laintiff and by all » 8nd who are all of her next of said deed, and that the plaintiff each and all be hereby forever ny claim or demand whatever against h e ° “ . 1 ~ Conveyance thereof and that tie sare shall be her dau in the Superior ~— + Usif i ne ~, U! 2 uv + + . ( ‘ Yr i + De , ~-*< ’ ie < cin, except the ner said Lor ‘ ; 4 “OWrance or Vawson B. Rufty and wife, ilizabetn W. a valid, legal hte rs ; sOurt,. tho sis or, who sign this and barred from land or against Rufty, by reason conveyance by the defendant, UC. &. Lowrance and wife, to Jawson RB. ’ aN B. Ruf ‘uty and ; wife. £ligabeth nufty, and the plaintiff and her heirs lo. 4470 wife, Elizabeth W. | y; d the dh neirs at law Shall fo mae C I~ ever be barred and estopped to claim any interest in said land NORTH CARULINA, > © Ae \ i e wie 2 ’ WUL euperi or sourt 2 Lth. That the Temporary restraining Order heretofore eranted IREDELL COUNTY. . cS + ally in thic blade’ oe: Honorable Frank |.. Armistrong, Judge of the 14th District shal} ’ 1 be oa Souther, ited and set aside. Plaintiff, that by as 1e I > proper wil ove lunas,. a. AG hennedy, any balance remaining of the rad la HNetendant. after the payment of her funeral] mM, + inls cause coming on ol 2 es } sit L LOG ra Judicial Ae et tele ee ER Mente mene ee ee Sit Me a - — verified complai filed by the plaintiff, the vourt VY fendant contracted and agreed to pay plaintiff the sun ur Hun J ’ ; - : wndred Seventy-three Dollars Sixty-one Cents Aintiffts ' vhich the interest in the partnership, Kk & 5S. Cabinet voiipany, Plaintire e714 tu i > + 194K 6 4it sold and @livered to the defendant on the 16th day ol July, 1940. s O. ‘rom the verified complaint filed by the plaintiff, the es finds ‘ , twtd i - ‘hat the defendant contracted and agreed to pay the plaintiff sixty thre @ Dol} Yollars ( 193.00) for work done by the plaintiff for the defendant 1946, and Uctober ine tiat the def ars ix o ¢ Ss ‘5 26.6) ’ vixty-one Cents (3536.61) on the matters ang tis Cilns Hundred Thirty-six Vollars complaint and rec set forth, ana rive nunarea } under tne Sourt further finds from the verified complaint 5, 1940. 7 ‘ lefendant contracted and agreed to pay the plaintiff the Sum of Fj i i llve ited in this Judrment i aoh ean ; I Ae PrapaA numbers 4 that the defendant is : C \ ©C ana o ing to Thirty-six Dollars sixty le Cents (3536 } two contracts he Fay Ot and the sumnons CAROL L NA ’ ITY Tr DELL Cou! = ® | * B. Bunch, or., trading 4 B g business as Bunch Mrs. ‘Fe and goin Hatchery, Plaintiff, VSe Defendant. cause cominr cont! ampshire the price 4 Hundred sixty Dollars (3260 he verified complaint filed by the plaintiff, the Jourt iinas Sale and delivery of the <, hock-Hampshire Cross price of 134 each, the defendant is now justly indebted to the iirty han aic t ore ™ dia ail « “g a 2 O i © 5 E ¢ = o C2 SG; ae - 5 = 2 a a = HS ros = rc ¢. o oD ) 2, m ~ » o bd o © oi } ‘lundred Two mount of ) 5 ¢ LO € he) ant defend ions upon the le sum of ti Yr rye other iin ple: or iurrer, ie) ( answer , paid. unt2i } A nted een Yr: Wy % oI 4 dings au ple OY 1 ent Jud vu } tled to ti en © fe A 4. @))7 — lua e a ae ea acvion 40 rnn Meese & adsl Papt + -CCyv and Se ae aA -4 LAINGIII, U pans Alt a Ra ae de AAS ice aa ait 1) PUnNnLN Aah 4nuin xe 10 C OY nce Cabs mad 01 ned Clerk pe hed aus ‘urni a etio A on suru a led a sumuons ww | ‘ned Clerk 4 D he under: e 7 u “? y anuar ev ions SUL ~ 1id —~ oC hat ,ounty and t] Iredell Lo ) he “4 17, “7 . ynuar ¢ T ounty on ¢ Li G 7 Irede of f 4 i p agt Me One by the a vo the defendant 4 Oo jeclared forfeited in the real estate assi-cneg jower, and to recuire her to pay taxes on / and street assessments, and for th recovery of ent of a receiver. fhe plaintiffs have in the real application for extension ave no further interest sourt from ip is u . | Se : . ~ . nm all Clerk of the heard before C. G. Smith, vlers he Court, ‘ x * ; 2 wnoari c to tne . North Carolina, and 1G at earl ng , 17 ~+ sOUNTY d the matters set forth in the application ' — se ; : 4 \jinberrys time to file compiaint, and the statements of Adams, Dearman and " Attorneys at Law, that: 1. an action to have the life interest . ~_ 2 eee Tan ee tr ee ee SS S4 - mM wo S > 4 « hee ® ” ort SS » ‘ ‘i. + ® ) > P i - + : » ° be a 2 : » > S © = ; <S © oY ° : > 4 re) a Ss @ «> -- > Sy + <= C - = 3 - » 3 » & ‘ +» u Oo 3 » = ° “ c S, 3 a cr? » rt * 4 4 ; 3 > > 3 co & 4 c S ~~ ° > ss o 4 rt ® 3 : Se o OQ, ‘ a4 ° $ ad Cc —{ = _ £ . $ - CC x : = 5 © $4 re) a Z $ c a L w q@ | fi - c ae = = ) @ | 2°38 8 ale 4 re) cE . pip f ‘ © bo} @ “4 ri. ' , 3 ° y ort a GS = E + ¢ : CS £ » Ayo ~ . - § & ° i > i e . Cc ‘ co 3 = uy io] ois . 3 4 . a © S > Col hk t ee 3 © 4 ‘ @ 3 oS 2, uM 7 . } “ : bo - ; 4 4 “sg a Onmw + ~ ! Db ; . Se > } ‘ - Ss G Ww ~ ) S4 ) 4 » 3 Y o t 4 S @® @ ao | c . > > ; 7 \ : 3 ¢ be > 4 + » oO 2 >) i WY) _ Sy cs ® > G4 + > ? , ~ - oq oy oO TS 4 + ' +» “ Q GH » Ly rt ra ° * a oe. gs & «¢ et a S&S Ov « O C4 . Go € a ss - : : © . ~ . 5 3 & u > Oo O = “4 ON mn + Me > nm 4 od Wy) tC. 4 > Q) ay S 4 v cs rt = | ; m & o 4 &. oc ss & SBS a G&G a ¢ e 4 = < + 2 ca ) r < ; - : ¢ 2 ss - » i re) n P, ~ 4 H + 4 2 4 FS) > . CS @ 9) a i ( £ + © © > > +> S4 ° w 2 »P ag “A ~ by, « : ‘ re + » “4 oO @ mn 7 wn ie ne z = S - “ » : > u u v » oO @ 6 os a << ¢ qd $, S 1 o , “ > . ‘ <7 » - on - o = : ° - 7 CS S a 4 ”~ Sy @® c o c ‘ % Q ‘4 7 cs - Cc 4 5 4 “ » o bu re) Sy rs) @ @ = » 3 NS Sa S G 5 0 ; > — : oe om > ; ‘ a. — - = 2 . = = © €¢€ ¢€ =o @ “ = o - . C @ w > i : q > * > > 4 9 5 + : 5 =< t os . . © eo 3 4 - fa s S he ¢ oS 6 ; s ‘_- ° : pane eo a‘ m + { 2 S >) < > 4 oO » » o t » ry & ae Q S, 1 » $y ) ) 4 F a Q) a) r r s er) “4 @ uw oO a < 4 ‘ - ® ” “” @ rr . | 9 ate C4 3 =e 7 : = oO o a S4 b, Q ° al o o *% { Bs SS 4 4 S C & » ® C ww + : © rc ce) 4 4 > > 4 ~ a ® = © s. e om ° ¢ +> rh > » ‘ o. » C > = > = ~? 3¢ te 3 4 ao 2 . : ‘ = » : ; ie . ; a » - mo a - 4 s “A r~4 ce a . o : 4 4 . a PEs. e ae . oe 2 ‘ by - @ » rd wn Y cs “4 “= = i a @ . ‘ Oo > cS od @ o fe} ms ve > a =e , = . ee 4 » > re) Q a cf fa — _ om <= Xs ‘ + ao 2 4 | 4 © = 4 2 ca ot 45> 2 a -_ no © re) 2 » ‘ ¢ rd cd € : rH Ss - = q o S © xo cD c$ $atD 3 4 - ord > O4 GH » ~ @ wo am . . LN << = — @® ‘ G4 »> 4 $ S. G4 C4 a G4 — 3 S. hk. CQ = ~ Ss @ o = c 1 > > 4 sot wa w a o a ‘oO eae | ep Oo Ss @ > @ @ et @ rs) > i » > ba be @ GH <= orf -~t — fx mt $. £2 °o a] S ‘) 4 re) 3 C3 ow ov = @ “a4 << ee OQ cs co +> Se t =) » > oO ‘ 2 3 s+ 4 4 ‘ “4 ‘ wd oO bs @ re) - oo tx os & ¢ on a “4 os ' wo 14 “© od @ bs oO > @® “A co e—t 3 = = s: $ : : 2 4 ‘ oOo @ 4 : 2» Ga 1 = ta mi < ‘ oe > > > + ‘ , . . , - a . : S oO = o ; 4 his regained ho has 1 Ve art, ae by in this filed ts Account aqrace Tillotson, iditor said u A an Al r's Lee . e rn | Sy HO 2 e- ow & TS OQ @ mw Ee =k > Oe DON 43 Gs liections ? ort ) fq ) 59 o> Onv oc Ss 2H = - ”~ OT ~ « rs er aan he ee. n= © C4 Oo : iis OeF DEE GH Ged © aa “4 > sO 2. =a oa.s © Ont LO = oO ce Bs cS ‘s eae ee a? mc a I » S Submitted Vv Udi or wespectful | On TLS e 7 i os a ~ po he on, ae oe “~s “4 al So FE -» ae i 7 . . a ‘ ' . > = oO - + | by = So Ga t) - ~ _ ‘ go « t : + cs ~ i. e 4 ¢ 4 “4 - er > ° oH + e * ¢ e °® sot > a = 1 + wa = SS a4 Ss © tf & S$. $6 ; o ; = ‘ ° . . . ee Y ~ > € y+ vil gud ° . ° . h. ~ ! + bM ¥ £ . ¢ ro) tne yf lianas in t jalance the include t nands Aik AT’( port ti @ oc - ® cS <3 a Os & oO > = f. O WM eng rca cai 2 rt oc E~ oy ~ - @ S o— = .- — wid? w@ Cc rik owt 6 » n Vi One I Ssherbow and by assi Cir josepn ; vu hereby cer City, ’ In UY 4 } harylana, ertificat ® ha Oo & ‘dA oS) ot oO MX GS °o a u f ys =F Si EE tet Os eal ontinued ’ J orner o The defenda ler f ANC os -> Sin rc rt o ee ct om cr ' = * Pr? ot > - > ~ £ hi c 22 ) 4 e ay 4 ecg ) i _ 7 eH gual ci ~ a pe Gis Gs ¢ oO -~ : - a 0 © oO ‘ ~ a 5 . - oO ay > a Cc ¢ i = cy + at ‘4 p wt ; a eA > UY ct ° + m4 + co . r ° e ° ° « . he 1 Qe ) D oe ' > pee Ae ae oe 4 2 a 74> @ oO 8 4 3 oO ) ¢ +? 4 ‘ ¢ > ¢ o Gy ny “* po @ . . i : ( > ba ali Stn ay = = ——— eee ——— = as ae perty ary Vv other county p!? and il at 10 O'clock. 9 j DU, ourt takes a recess unt ‘ay able ¢ 4 4 A oe a a ea a ed ven = hee tia Ree ae aie ae a A ee ae ee ee ee ’ rf MALU UUs our nit i' LN resi Cid: bon: eereaine—- seers sen are ae oe nN y reced: . by oe) 4 . n 42 ~ or $ . - Be > ” . - ‘ ; ‘ oo = ~ 4 ‘ <—~ =e - nv w~ - . ° . 2 a ~ ‘ . - . : I ae i . t e r — -- = ———— > — intakes eae ee at ~ . ~ ee é Se 2 : a : : ~ = ee ae ieee ee SS a ae SS ae Kae ee = == er a a Se eats ae ale = =— 2) S ej Cu 7 SSS See eS —_ as — ee ib Mi eas ad ea Se ee SS pee: we LEE OEE YER SS SLT LS OS es ee ee " mate A = eo ene , Sane at aa PSS Po er et Nea ae ac Ee as. SP SPIELE S atin Now 4423 NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TREDELL COUNTY. Southern Railway Company, ! a corporation, Plaintiff Vs. CONSENT JUDGMENT i, G. Morris, Defendant ! ! I ! ! It ppearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendant have compromised and settled all causes of action and claims of every nature what- soever arising out of the matters and things described in this cause of action or resulting from this cause of action or the things described therein; NOW, THEREFORE, Upon motion of plaintiff, and with the consent of defendant, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed; 1. That the injunction and restraining order imposed by this court by its judgment entered on the 2nd day of February 1948 be and it is hereby dissolved, and é. That the order of this court with respect to the recovery of Jaintiff's costs from the defendant, as set forth in Paragraph 5 of said juig- tent on the 2nd day of February 1948, be and it is hereby set aside. This the 11 day of May, 1949. Frank M, Armstrong Judge Residing in 15th Judicial District "€ Consent to the foregoing order: iT. Joyner Scott & Collier YR. A. Collier “torneys for Southern Railway Company i, G, BREE Be ae ae aa eae HEA I 3 2a A I A / ; No.4.513 NORTH CAROLIN NORTH CAROLINA ‘e Ge sede tome : IREDELL COUNTY IREDELL COUNTY | o city of Statesville, a municipal | Benjamin Klitzer and Julius Sorporation. aes Klitzep, T/A.B. Klitzer plaintifi & Son Plaintiff Vs. | Vs. JUDGMENT J, T. Speaks, and wife, Olivia Speaks; John 4. vcott, Trustee, Ross M. Rimmer, T/A People's People's Loan é Savings Dank; Store Jonn Aw Cutchins and ©, U, Defendant Trustees; Grace Securities end the County of Iredell. Defendants, This cause coming on to be heard before the Honorable C. G, Smith, E i coming on to} Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon the motion by the plaintiff ‘ ee Une OU} erior 7ourt . for judgment against the defendant by default final exes as set out in the Com And it appearing to the court that a verified complaint was filed and 0 summons issued in this action on the 30th day of ‘pril 1949; And it further appearing to the court that said summons together with a copy of said complaint were served on the defendant on the 3rd day of May,1949; plaintiff. And it further appearing to the court that no answer, demurrer or other o r 5 . or July,19h ay rt 7 J 9° pleading has been filed by the defendant and no extension oftime to file pleadings has been granted and that the time for filing pleadings has expired; And it further appearing to the court from the verified complaint tut vonsented to: : : ‘ of rier & Woodhouse the cause of action consists of the breach of an express contract to pay 2 sul fer & Woodhouse attomeys for the Plaintilr O HUNDRED THIRTY-ONE & 90/10° wes a money fixed by the contract, namely, the sum OF TW DOLLARS with interest thereon from the 19 day of April 1947; and decreed that the plaintif? Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, ; . ; th have and recover of the defendant the sum of 3231.90 with interest thereon oe 19th day of April 1947, and the costs of this action. Before This 18 day of June, 1949. Brown, )I Plé intiff, I Bese Seah ak eo ae 3 a a a ae 2c 3) a 3 2c 8 RII a SC ACE 3 3 AIK HE ale a Be Rea EAE “ahd | rown, | fen iant,. is cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before C. G. sler} , } : ‘ 7 Qn s ; “ of the Superior Court of lredell County, North Carolina, and it + ’ a as 34 eter vO the Court, and the Court, and the Court tinding from the state- “ents ve Ons vin a f fdans and Woodhouse »Jearman & \inberry, Attorneys for the plaintiff, ‘ward a " 4 and J G I . , ate S “+ G. Lewis, Attorneys for the defendant, and from the statements Of the nrasnc, Plaintiff and the defendant: a. That all matters and things arising between the plaintiff anda iin Gee and con {EDEL nad completely [REDE fendant on the complaint ani answer herein I iled have been fully COUN TY | a * llace compromised and settled. 5, Gorda valiac Plaintiff have entered into in they have arreed to li full Tsing arreed to pay ee et thet ALE Wi Ht 377 stad Wenil] Con: ‘ *%e Chur auto Service * ‘ a's a ; } }! "20 > , \le ) n cause coming on to be heard hefore the Honor ble U. G mit ’ SS ee = Seasons: grows nina ( : , laintiff for ““verior Court of Iredell Coun y, upon motion by the plaintiff ! ne. ae Se acad oc * ) . "rT ry ; cr } 3 C urt ‘“alnst tie defendant by default fina; and it appearin oe eae vag Verified comp ~ 7 Of by ay 949 : ‘ - hat said 'Y, 1949; and it further appearing to the Court that > ° te his a : n the laint was filed and summons ssued in this action 0 summons, ether ys with a Copy of the complaint, was served on the defendant on the7th : Kile . -} ; Prmthe annec oy r , Qn day May, 1949; and it further appearing to the Court that no answer, demurp as 1 . 2 ye other pleading lias been filed by the defendant, and no extension of tin | © to fj or pleadings has been sranted and that the time within which pleadings may be py - tlleq has expired; and it further appearing to the Court from the verified co mp] alnt that plaintiffs cause of action is based upon a promissory note in the anount ~ Ff , , } ‘ } Te . . me OC . _ dat " 4 a 5 - soe of Two hundred and Ninety (.3290.CO) Dollars, dated August end, 1947, and due with interest at the rate of six per cent from November therefore, it is ordered, adjucsed and decreed that the and recover of the defendant the sum ofTwo hundred thereon from the 2nd day action. pain eETS ee Te = s ee SS Sf Cc. G. Smith Clerk ouperior Court sy consent of: frivette, liolshouser and liitchell and Wi. *. Battley trivette lolshouser & Mitchel] BY: we Pe Litchell Attorneys for Plaintiff Scott & Collier ie Collier, ittorneys for Defendants 32 sie ste ste she she ste She ste sic ste she sie aie ste ste st 3 BY BIS DYE SIE DR DYE BYE BIS DYE DI< BIS BIE DIS BIR BIE AE OS 2 m?whAN AOE outlet for the marketing Oo: ata ie corporation was incorpora Provisions of the General tatutes of North v roductsS. 1 in 1914, before tie ‘orolina were adopted. a ? yoration an Y - cor ‘ c @ 2 ~t O © 4 hunt 4 a ma eS ¢ « ®@ 4> & "41 tO § C4 cA ep SU moO +6 Foe ne iS %& © “5 &) “a ¢.€ -y wa OD CS fy GS oO @ 40 OF YP Anyp ) Seat «a: sar a = - ‘ siwt OS wt 854 9, Y TH O aut P aA NOrd J en rol 4 in the conc] Ope t rato. goin; fore 3et forth ) 2, il N n p + o ne ol , ot Ss 7 he fact i plaint i e ourt + uU e é f th n the record ert t i) preme ng i ar ™ find a - ty) U u 19 v wo o t - od el OH 4 Ju YN + u no sour iarter, ts ere tae 4 er - se ie A cee rporation rtiz a Pe eo Fe has tablish th ions od < fee” & v4 oO Sf 3 ort on _ ! ee = : : e > @ o} ss } . > . : © . a be co? , z C ‘ 4 o> 4 cS = SS v > 7) cis } om ra & o ° Ga el + @ Q « 2 - cote ( ¢ 5 . - | Rane’ \ 4 @ “ 0 2 i c > we = hell iiged . . s _ ® 2 - ‘ ‘4 ‘ ~ . . a ; ¥ . ry ee" t ext ne aot uU ow 4 aa r ee ter per1o 2 i aa . ; ~ : 4 co) = | G4 + > ny > a re) 5 - i es > i : s . . | née ¥ -— Bs : : Oo >. > 1 ¢ . ~ oS a » ~~ s r ; Gg ~ Ps < r - iz . > ‘ 4 ©) ‘ \ 4 *r - - : ‘eS 4 > > © & ws - © 4 C 4 ; ™ a » ti - _ ‘ — > n~ <= c CN > : c. > ~ - G4 > “ ‘ ° L a Oo oO CN se —_s = —s — ~— — 4 a = » < cc se : ~ “ c + ~ . a ; * + a? ¢ ; I > . ‘ a = ° ea r = pe ‘ G as e Cc ~ r4 Sy + = © ¢ 9a 3 A 3 ~ t ~ r> im ‘ . = . 2 : > + . zs . . - > e. c $4 ” GH 4 ~ w 4 c. ies _ » ° oO Q Oo ‘ ‘ ‘ ” ¢ ot L ‘ qa! ‘ ~ s - ; : — © r> 1s o> ~? o> —- = : Ms @ Bg 8 4 ¢ 4 - 7 a ¢ ; n | eo - ° l ‘ e 4 ~~ 4 » ‘ > & c ° ‘ 1 - - >) - } ; 4 . - ; ; ¢ > : ; : o = © . ed ‘ ~a ; > ° i ) t a + ©) > > aoe ‘ c ‘ ba . - fa oO “i ‘ ‘ = > . > 5 1 q wo . ‘ ‘ ) : . os £ i cg ; » $ s ann @ 3 tO Q ; > 2 e+ - hs : : . ‘ @ os “ + Ee ‘ o a 2 7 — ; Sy é ; - “ ‘ < ; ‘ a , : 4 > x fea > < 5 lS ais oie : 3 . ‘ ¢ ¢ i D> SF 2 > 7 > < c © + + 2 4 g = > » 2 Oo A a 2 + 3 i r Se ‘ 4 : 3 » 4 “ a Se ) e ¢ ‘ ‘ 5 4 < 2 -1@ & co 4 Oo > t, ) a mito,e << “ - 4 > ‘ - ao Oe 4) < ‘ $4 43 KIS et ea a4 ° am) ed os > o 3 : 1 . _ : 4 : wd oo c+ ~~ mrs ° 4 ~ ate © D «4 D : - : c . TS OS * | ¢ ont Shea -rA Pp o, 5 c cs 3 S& . : 4 ® 3 < * i tnd Om % ™ yee e + , > ~—< ~~ ) 4 + ¢ : + ° - r 4 + ' r © ‘ ~ “cf > : . + f + ® r oF ¢ a ‘ is < 4 wn” - ‘ i. ‘ . 7 —* @ - ‘ 4 r 4 “i ‘ 5 ; : $4 : rm — . rt” ) ; 2 ¢, ca 4 a . a > vb ~~ 7 f ‘ > 4 a re ’ ’ ; : : a 3 wet = ee ae a , = . = i , - tao sits. saulieeein ties caseeastanalinetaaiiaeaedaaaatel = es ea ream 62 ae oe, , rs “ 1,194.9 m 4 4 uit Morar: OUR On > — On oO ea : ne ; 4 ”~ e ) @ ‘ @ CrIMd 4 > « ~~ 4 ‘ ° 4 e359 4 4 : rics 4 ) ce b { : P44 Jat : i } a 5. -, ‘ 4 ) f bh Qh a § t o - | 3 s ~ es S : a6 : = ii J una 4 Ss ra : : a3 6 vi c+ ‘ 3 r+ 2 ~ She hn = a i Pe ces o ; ; ‘ ; ; - a tad Hr ae 3 ) m= 9 He s : - wo ) a) , ) at ~ e a i as = r) r> ° i@ 1 = SS iW aga Te ‘ a = 10) in a . 4 a ' ‘ c « oe; ric’ 2 So 22 04 ; 4 . E44 Lod fed . cn & ie a one ; 4 c + Y ard TH ord / Q = - ‘ rt 7 eS 14 E4 . i ‘ - » 22 © fs 4 O i 3 ; ee : S eS . > cc a | F =< 5 i 3 ro 2 6 } 20 4 ik & “ .*S E> r> “ ~ ' £ Oo Od . . 5 , ‘ c ? + > 2 i) I-< 3 _ — ~ < [x4 — a =e ee ee <a ee ee Ee es Ee oes oe mcone maces me a —_<—— —_— <a et ee _— LV a Se . << <= =~ a RT . * cS 4 © > © 2 ¢ i ad S oS ® 2 — 9g . ® : 13°) ot ; 2 § } 5 : ; % Es ‘, os > —_ uN : a e 2 2 aH ® > CR o . - i as @ 5 © | . ~t - < on c2 m~pmn & mp * Rp 0's . : ~ - = ' . + @ 4 2 : ; 1 dq cs > @® $M. =~ 3 “oO ¢ : : - co , ; <a 3 iS 4 3 3 “~») 2 ep) > * +> 3 ° > a ; a > 7 ‘ : 4 8 aa - on So on” : on” 3 65” & So 5 = . 4 4 > 'O ° 4> eo ae . a : 3 ‘\ = ce = t= = 2 > @ 2 oO > s QoQ et ’ oo —_ Sos >A "3 7a ; 2 oOo ~ oo @ > ? s ; v. ~ _ = 3 » « 4 ort ' “4 “4 2 , 3 = 3 : > < @ od 5 - : @ i to > 4 . . 42 t > = 3 » 4 = C3 > oO 3 ‘ @ - = “s + ie ; 3 —. j ? 4 MH oO © : @ c + s ) ‘ & ‘ o S @ 4 o 2 3 of 1 e ° ' ° ° a + Ss &S p> € : > 2 i S é 7 S > + @ ‘ o } . aS ‘O & ’ = 4 ‘ * { 2 . . Ss 4 4 = 3 o i ‘ ) , . ° i ° . . - > ‘ a a . as mc ae ™ 2 Oo m4 2 ~ . =" ; : > > S oe _ O ie ‘ ra) Sy ° . 3 : J ‘ i a ra © Ss - i ° 1 c 4 3 = es c> » 4 r c ane > ¢ ‘ ° - —t e oa : : : ; 4 = ve nN 3 F 4 ay - , . 4 4 ‘ ” ” VY “ . r - 4 co rnd ) : } 49 ° : e e -) = ® i OQ - > @®o . ; . . > ; : a . j . : @ by t ° a * ‘ M4 S g a me ry | + ) “d ’ ; S 3 = a 3 =) a es : ” : : Cy a fH - b> ot 4 - o ; > D> ; ; 5 ee s ry . ’ a i - © Bs ; = - . ~t i . - s 2 ) r : » { y . . . . . 4 Pe Me ~ ~ + ”~ J 4 5 ‘ : C - oa 5 S . S . : = ’ i . Oo bu =4 cn sau tr = 4 -* . ¢ 4 : ! i be P a ‘ or ‘ CS —t oO cS ? O e e . . . —{ C > = > 5+ wx 2 o +) O ( bo - $ 2 3 C : & ee CN’ <: ) c : = 2 2 ? > AH { : : 5 2 adi “ om 2 ae 3 - , —“ a = +f OV ; S * a oO ? c a O , 0 ¢ a. a “A + cs r-i » - 2 5 H 5 ; ; > ? ¢ - - t co f ‘ ~ > @ ° 7 o 2 2 : © a5 a4 4 + . 4 . am - oO -> 5 -, by ; a4 “4 : @ > oe f+-4 3 5 O > { * - 3 we < . - _— ro) Sy 2 iv 4 a4 > a 4 ; 4 " 3 5 4 _ oe as : } 4 °s * « > : _ a . 3 O B= oO co { : @ O a 2 : S to oS par > 5 ‘ e) : a C o ; a ° =. . ; + VY So 4 4 } “ Se G4 5 ~ ty mo ri 4 4 ‘ 7 4 - ’ 7 © = a ~ 3 - t) 1 1 ) = a yp » - U 4 V > 4 * ° O ) org org ~ i ee me = n O ha { ; ; Od me = ~~ 4 4 +/ 4 2 -~ > < 4 CS e W ie 2 © O : Ss ° . . . 7 . . . i ‘ e . M4 uv 2 4 - : . 4 Oo M 2 Oud GO - ~ st od -4 r =, * 2 : | 2 0 - ~ + o- { ) a yt | . > * e e -" . . . . 4 4 ° = + a ms r © rs > oe oe Pp ee @ ‘ re) ’ ot 3 O 4 eo © “4 + > ; x ; S “3 4 > ‘ - : ~ ; : , ; “ oa 7 s ; 2 . 3 r a - w a t) 3 : _ ; « SC mo po , "£ » ee 2 3B to a 8 6 2 4 “> . $ > “ -oe8 5 » ; : ~O8 & = > ‘ a 2 { ‘ : oe 2 4 : - i © ) ° : . oS i ‘ 3 : = S O ; et / ~ oo + ‘ 3 , . e : aN - ~ ~ 4 a ? oO o o . re it a . ~ ¢ 3 - a4 { 2 2 - ef % - > ‘ $ or — r yp x) ‘ ‘ 4 1 4 . e. oe S ~— “cd ~ 2 + ? ~ | 5 7 > fa. - 9 : i 3 > Ps - ) | Cy ‘ , ) . ° . — C a 5 4 4 > > - ean 2D Et : 4 = , . re) , 2 —{ my C4 oi co eo “rt “rt oS o 2 : € 4 > — = mS $y oY $ oo) oO ; ¢ = _ ; a 4 ? y ° _ * a : : 2 : ween ~ aan © ~ ET es a — — ai. « a Sek eed = 0 a | pny HO oS s RT TERT, 1949 3 H ICUS iU SUPERIOR COU y m AUIS ry August hia ~~ = tS =a. & - tat -? a +4 Oo aa) a 4 ed ntinu VO i sed ra mnt i 16% Jud) “Te iled. ZL Process stanter 3 > aC { { ~e . * ) 7 he 4 i = ; =4 ~ ro © © —— & ae ee eg —— ——— ii 4 2 4 4 : » 2 4 $ + a4 ~ ) a ca . . . am “~ LN : = 9 = : “2 ® : si C @ - oO a) : > =< Po o - = >> - = ox . : > ‘ ¢)> 2 . ‘ Usa = <> <a 7 TOC Gwwre > Py) ft) V. - ” . “a “4 . > > os . = - © w”~ ) t. 0 ~ - © 4 4 + “ci Cie -~" 7 . - os 2 > > e w“~ “ . © >.> > + > — ~ . ' ' 3 4 i i cat 4 42 . . rt ; . ° > c ) 3 » 4 ; 40 . . —— << <a 4 to 4 oo] 4 r «“ . se - wt 4 = 4 hy My “to ¢ 2 pon “ee - me FEE, Fae a nee ae ee a a eT a ae, - 5 pe SATIT.T The defen Mitchell ‘ < ) —< ee sent conse tinued ,ON) . IN TH eT 1 THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRS BE = rie iF tay ‘EK --- AUGUST TERM.1949 Monday. A UGUS i ucust 2nd, 1949 ’ ly,A ugust lst a 99 »L949 No. L245 MURDER nie pr. » las mta a © « + 5 sa my, ao The defendant enters a plea of not rui Lty. state The ‘ican Jury returns x tionsSuit xs orrchornatk xtex xbicks xoxo houx, i present) 2 True pel hat pen Court in At the close of the State's evidence the de fee ge for a judment as of NON-SUIT. Motion allowed, ar: Cll ‘endants move forrest Lytle Forrest Lytle with the and ficures as follows: ransom vot mer btn We Wien LALVEI 1, SOU) Gr open Court in ly eos a True Bi f Indictment charging th laniante THE } Lt offense of l.urder in worde forrest uy vune, “.U, vounty, unla forethous) ht, to the form and A ainst vounty of Ired eloniously, uraer one I SUR Tila STATs UPOL Dimi Yast ot 18 dag 9 of June, of the Countv of iredel ie aid” sounty, ( rce d arms, at ie La ¥ walt bu Loree ta i -— a1 406 afo orebhrous! ALLY, eloniousiy, anda can © the {0f% , , ae ray Ca ntrar ~ cook ene £l,5 tteneics murder one h Fenroy Ca con and against + igs LLURDER tute in such case made and prove \ The defendant through | 4 n+ e cu F — John R._lichaug lit 4 ; enters a plea of | uiltve ~ 728 an*® &e fay T ne Solicitor i=39 plea the Solicitor nf aE = aé rt "NO. 1. 7 OT: , Vs IN MEMORY OF J. C. Be EHRINGHAUS Percie Taylor ‘ to learn of +) This } j sa 4 0 e& —— the death o; 1S vourt was shocked and deeply saddened this morning , a lose 1 of assed away in Raleigh h Nw PusNd <aSt ninhe former Governor J. C. B. shring shaus, } who Pp eanding governors URD oi inhig co /*, GOV. Zhrinchaus was one of the State's outstanci os %e of a ae this state has lost one of its greatest leade ae aa a nad eran witness ‘St in nig vtatelts most brilliant and outstanding lawyers, a é ail covernnent, Raymond Bruner } if not op 2 tind the establishment of justice which is the en of a. a. Bill Lackey iPeaved ¢ all human society. ‘This Court desires to express 153 Sythe hy a 2entious = ae a os the —sndersigned “*votd on anitly | and the people oF Hores ae we public servant has fallen. Those marked x sworn d JE ons tiring zea]. Truly a great law P forem ar xamined before _t.ie¢ Grennn = hi . his memory. and this ota found A TRUL ah tne ram This court will recess at noon out of respect to He Was 20 i ‘i 7 it , " IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK--- AUGUST TERM, 1949 Monday, August 1st ,194,4 CARRY CONCEALED WEAPON Continued for the defendant iSSAULT Continued for the defendant RJURY No warrant issued in ust Term, 1949. lower Court. cenrcc¢c LI WOR ‘Ontinued for State Court takes recess until Tuesday Lorning, ~ —_——4' yw Ue JUDGE PRESIDING a Auge hs IN THE oUPuRIOR CO A ’ am TPT . OU AUGUST TERM, FIRST EER- 1949 Tuesday, August end , 191.9 ; on 1 s Honor a ble Gourt conven 30 acc ord j es c 4 ing to ad 5 day liorn i né ? August end, a OL “J @ A MIVING DRUNK: SPELDI Judgment heretofore entere ) t r Pe > 4C envered on No. 1055 spate vs stricken out. John Leonard ‘No. 1056 State vs Jonn Leona No. 1057 state vs John Leonard tivaal I. he L ie gael Ve Ue iwi m a 4ne gael ndere -Yild e sia VU Jad larceny, ju coniined in or - ve confined in THatSbE nor m - Ay ash 4 J pr : count is suspen yn 4 of ites any ar riod, Solicitors Walter Bailey on . _ Se ,@1envany as to tae ceny, judgiient confined in tne State Prison ONE nor more than THREE Y.ARS. On tue ore count, Judgment of the jourt is that tne d fined in the State Prison at Raleigh ior n THREE nor more than FIVZ YZARS. By consen ant in open Court, this intering Count is suspended after t.e expiration : condition that the defendant remains not violate any of the laws of the state o In the event the defendant violates any of this judgment during said five year period commitment to issue upon motion of the sol the discretion of the judge presiding. ‘ora period oO xf the Court is that the defendant 0D at Raleigh for not tess vil if the sentence on th st ¢ of zood hehavior Ournment on nt for lar- h king and unterng efendant be con- ot ] t sentence on tie 3reaki f e f North Carolina. the terms of capias an feitor, and in 561117 & 1108 state ulyde cCOlene H. O'Neil 197 No. de Ko che otate vs Srnest Alexander SUPERIOR COURT -- AUGUST’ TERM,194.9 August.2nd, 1949 IN THs FIRST WEEK Tuesday, BRSAKING, ANTSRING AND LARCENY It appearing to the Court tha Court, the defendant entered a . of entering and larceny, sente ced to SIGUTZEN 1c) at the First Offender Camp to do Sacee therein a on law, which road sentence was suspvended YEARS and the defendant placed on other things, Governiuient and be of good behavior, the Court, and the Court finding as of the Superior Court of Iredell County been conv d of breaking and enterin: an in the | of indictment in No. 1237, and” terms of the judgment heretofore ent therefore, upon motion of the do nt issue to the end tinat the defe sentence heretofore imposed. at the lay, 1948, Ter of cuilty bo breakin:. and Was ri ino lor a per ‘od of Fiyz proba ation on condition, f the State or Feders] lOW appearing to that at ti that he violate no laws * / : anda nr é& $ ct Q b- > ct ct os ae NS Alin) Gw v&. larce eny, fa sc] eitor, idant the It is, commitme serve EO ordered t} De recuired ¢ Ses - VV Vssaiw Man TAN ttt) WITTY L we 7 ANU wAAVGENE e e yvde l.essic] uelenaant, 31y s.E€SS1CK, } ‘ — Se Court 1s tnat the defen Iredell Jounty to ’ re it ceny count, contr ’S Vamp this sen 1107-11° 1a enteri be confined * ~~ T¢ } 4. savy i ‘O6 rex ukeiz nit dei Nndaant Less tnan its endant in open Court, f FIVE YEARS after consolidated, on cor ion that violate any of t five year perio sentence is ~~ : Live Or ana se confined inl prison : . . , a " 2 yn robat Or a perioa OL FAV ss ‘orth in and further suspen G1 par the 20! (S upon the cOnhe con ‘itions » 2 ay ri iered p\Udh Us VS sereu vine, prob drink 1SKey ,AULT By consent of defendants in open is continued until the November nt by each of the defenaants intc sum of 5200. Q, said money to of this court. r ayer I Cou Jourt, fay Lor y tne ,, 9 of wrt ) 19h ” -* i uli TERLNG sha RC ENY Al iJ RigCi SIVING is judsment of 1 the Court that the def fondant De wonan Divison States Prison at Raleigh to FIVE YEARS. prison sentence is suspended, probatation for a period of ns set forth in this judguent. YE: FIVE YEARS upon * The defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Capias. Capias Instanter. therefore hus yioi aVacy iration @ tie as provi ded hy set Tore. Cc a his tery t the defendant 2: nen in ths 4aiOU ofl wilt ’ we * + ) y tne vou J sor sy or vce. jant + and the defenu @ vv ig at es consine ter 0 s fro custody FIRST WEEK’ -- No. 1246 — seas Taylor C-36 No. 1250 state vs 21 Banks white Oe 1231 viable vs 00 1.CHaiNn, oT. 17 Oe Ledp / otate vs Dass) 4 a raul ratterson : of sata “00 1162 at vtate ve VO seltn Sherrill = the ] ] atte of tri son: ent of wrt Sits T tne shed SEV Li {his cause ec aE » day of Aucu of Superior Court by ¢ v0 : “ urt » that the records ae 2nd rf ’ = +U 1S ordere and he is and my Ounty I e “J ‘ree..c rad 1 7 5 OL the Iredell 2d, adjud; he reby that she be IN. THE SUPERIOR Court. AUGUST TERE Tuesday, August and, 19h9° LURDER ine solicitor Announced that he verdict of lurder in tne first "hen i. of liurder in the see 7 vide ihe | jiu 4s verdict evidence — the enters At the nis varrents, defend ant thr rou plea of Close of plea of not wanslauchter, Jud en ient of in the otate! than nor 2h Nis not 1747 not suilty, the evidence +1 : sl vLUCHCE 1é fend ee wwéive LS Gelendant SUlLty and enters - : 5 12 enters »lea d it torney 5 tue Court is th S Prison at ialei Ore than ee the 4iul) rw: Yai Ly corpus, iss imé¢ d Jud<se crecoraersc Ominz on to 910 i st, 19! ‘t7 9 Cll ° { 3 { : nt of tiie 5 a es 1 > J vu I « nty Ct id Court mi idered and considerins ’ . > ke we vounty .eco - ¢ Ol Sa risoner: sheriff Iredell oner, =tta sae Javis, isonment. 7 > vile pris impri red and decreed directed to release tne delivered from iur ner iy of August.1949 i’ ‘rank ied imrmstrone Juice of the superior Court for the Fifteenth Judicial District rr ne Grand Jury passed on all bills presented by the Solics 48 IN. -THE SUPERIGR COURT FIRST WEER ---- AUGUST TERM, 1949 Tuesduy, August 2nd,1949 nNmpymm GRAND JURY REPORT AUGUST TERM, 1949 - or, -nt an 4- + CNH . none at " Olntea to insp ct ie varlous county proper vles a) jink, as Chairman inspected tle conditions are considered to now in progeess seems to ve pro the following repair joos Comittee recom need@°#n the colored rest rooms NT Ny TIMMY) TA P vans aie AN THE SUPERIOR COURT SIRST WEEK’ --= jyucusr TERM Tuesday. Ane eg ent L949 tuesday, aucust <nd,191,9 r jn open outside drain « in the Home Demonstration Office and flood the rest roor floor but the ou ore satisfactorv arrangement of thi elude the floodins the floor: ne Cc mittee t This Honorable Court takes a recess ~ Aurus oo ear ae mst 3rd, 1949 at 9:30 O'Cloek. Judge PR'SID \G until Wednesday Morning ts ue IN TH SUPH} FIRST WEEK == AUGU! ' AUGUST TERM 19h9- Thursday, fucust 4th,1$,0° FIRST WEEK This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment on wea, Lilt Piss . 7 Canesday ae This Honorable Court convenes seecora3 am eo. Thursday Morning, August kth, 1949 at 9:3 toloc!] ( Ku ' , ryt ’ = i re € tered . ees rie P : n 4 } . 4) 4. : } . es 9 Aga Ror? ry +, fan ' 1 = my . : « ( rut vile 7 "e sid ' nuea | : © efer Nv ] e fol] win OY t t t ] r , + 1; en ( : : . i i Ty yyw 7 en ° *« ? . re ’ : 24 "Nivorce Jury to-wit: Meee PAT ret olin 7 ne ere ne Pa IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK == AUGUST TERM,1949 Thursday, August Ath, 1949 hiorrison ine on to N Tew atm nr In TRE YU GiulOR COURT Of WEEK == AuGU ST TER 1949 » august Lth,1oh9 FIi iat Thursd ay No. 4701 Florence B. Kerley Ve vee Carmel C. lerley fide resi the bringing "Yes", — . ; , “< a -adkn the complaint: the defendant commit adultery, as ecedin the conip 'Yes" Now therefore, on motion of Liacon Pe ximons, attorney tor tue lain fo . —_ eo ° L F ence B. “MALT, is is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff Flor and she is “€rley . in) h efendant Y, be hereby granted an absolute divorce from the d ’ “erme] ¢. or Cmany existing between erley and that the bonds of matrimony neretofore a o the plaintilri ne ba da Y € IN THE SUPERIOR COURT PIRST WEEK --= AUGUST TERM,1919 Thursday, Aurust th,19h9 and the defendant be and they are hereby dissolved, ypeartns to the Court, it further a and the court findin- i. three minor children of said marriase, Jerry Kerley are ¢ ye ars ida Kerley age 5 years, who have been livine wit © "sy ‘atic f their varerte«- y ration L Gneir 7 rent s; and it thea CY se o¢€ v } I fact tnat tne plaintiff 7 410 minor childr: le resident of the ot the bringing of this action: u fr ’ iurtner IN Tile sUrekKIOR COURT FIRST WEEK --- August Term,19y9 n Carolina, In the Superior Court Nort Iredell County. Margie Lee C. Upright Vse JUi aMuarp John M. Upright THIS cause coming on to be heard and betas heard before so wrank Ke Armstrong, Judge Fresi ing, anda jury at the Aurust Tern : V1 t ? ana 3 Superior Court of Iredell County, and it to the court that defendant has been properly served with ication a: defenda:.t was ulso personally served with sumuons an accordance with section 1-104 of the Genery Jtatutes of North Carolina / Aad the following issues having been submitted to and answered by the ju L a 7 le were the plaintiff an married as lesed i the defendant lawfully in the complaint: otas ° ' : ' Answer: "Yes," Nave the plaintiff and the defendant lived Separate anc apger from each other for two years next preceding the bringing of this action? answer: "Yes]" 3- Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North six months next preceding the »ringing of this "Yes", the f° ¢ Qn motion vnerelore, on motion rdered, lute »~A eha & Ma vii iS pright, and f matrimony } exis 92 ~ 3 > « ¢ vA a ULM OULVOUNe plaintiff and the defendant be and the: are ‘iere fs nd it further appearing to the court, and the court findin ‘ at he . . . ° : fe , ‘ Toi oh t ‘a ‘Ct, that there is one Minor child of said marri:ge, Mary <lla Upright , ase “* years,who has been living with her mother, the plaintiff, since the separa- tin: Aa , ne , fe fi ding “el ot her parents; and it further appearing to the court and the court finding “8 @ fact that the plaintiff is a fit and suitavle person to have custody and *ontrol of the said minor child, and that the best interest of said child would * Served by being in the custody of her mother. and she is hereby It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be a: Tanted ful] and complete custody and control of said minor child, until vue ‘urther order of this court. . . s s pay h sts of And it is further ordered that tbe plaintiff pay the 00 thi , * &¢tion to be taxed by the clerk. Thigthe 4th day of August,1949. Prank LM. Armstrong, I Judge Presiding. PE OR OR Oy 2 of aie 2k aK ae oi ke ok kf ak a a I I a aK HE aK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEK--AUGUST TERM,1949 _IN THE SUPERIOR cour? Thursday, August 4th, 1949 TROT WEL \UGUST TERM. 1949 \ hive oe EEK aon Thursday, Aucu t 4th, 1949 No. 4709 Georre Raiford Troutman, 004077 Plaintiff, . DIVORCE NORTH CAROLINA, Vse THE Divorce Jury 1" being duly sworn enpanelled ans\eres the issues submitted 1. . ragDELL COUNTY. Annie Mae C. Troutman, as follows: ed to it Ri Defendant. tin &. ‘tits, NORTI CAROLINA, IN Tit SUPERIOR couar IREDELL Qu INTY. aUGUST TERM, 1949 ° charles L. Vaniels, George Raiford Troutman, Plaintiffs, Now comes i.acon 1.. Simons, entitled action, a.d makes a motion Annie Mae C. Troutman, Defendant. . i VS. ) | it is contrary to the sreater l. were the plaintiff and the defendant legally marrie 3 It in the complaint? Answer Yes. the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Ca rlin (6) months immediately prior to the commencing of this action complaint ‘ OP os LES 6 the defendant commit a ( ict f adultezy as alleged H t Cece Wik tien a walford Troutian, tlaintiff, JUDGMENT lroutman, Defendant. 1) heard at the August mMmITsa ’ THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, and it deing rable Term, 1949, Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, before Hono 9 nN} ? rAG 1 7) . : : : a, - * aca er ude Trank Mi. Armstrong, Judge Presiding, and a jury, the following issues were * mitted to the jury: eged 4. 1. Were the plaintiff and the defendant legally married as all the complaint? 3 ns (2s ae S sone AS piaintii or Vule ¢ North caroll® the 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of * ccinainbi State of unwst vev€ of North Carolina for wore : action ane this f this for more than six (6 nths imned . nr} nmencerent of acti a (6) months immediately prior to the com ‘ction, as alleged in the comp] as alleged in th ; 3 ged in the complaint ‘ , answer: Yes, ‘ . . 4 answeres he first issue was answered "yes", and the second issue was © "yes", and the third issue was answered "ves": s TT To ween she bonds ° IT IS, TIDRUTORNT, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, solved, and that the plaintiff be and he is hereby granted a divorce ab ; cous tr DATED this th ‘ Frank M. Amis e 4th day of August,1949. = Presiding 2k kK kk ak a aK ak ake 2k 2k 2 a 2 2k 2k ak aK 2 26 2 a 2 I a as ornate ae SUPERIOR CORT | ——— "In ° * ? ° < Pldol WGK == AUGUST Pan 191.9 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST WEEKe=-=- AUGUST TERI,1949 Thursday, August 4th,1949 eed 4 ill Thursday, \ugust kth, 1949 1 5 9 n wT ? A > PUT Io a? CAROLINA, LiN od this i VOM mer ANTINTAM TREDELA COUNTY. e comins on to be heard and being heard at the Ajucust Tredell County, before liis Honor, Frank hl. armstrong, Judce ores . . ’ mem er ~ aneuwaran a7 ha < eess } . . ine and ¢ ury, and tn ury having answered all the issues Submitted to it y appears in the record; and it appearing to tip ¢. t E oad ae oe —— » ct . Dae ge } nriatnest £4 7 7 OO in li — t, ere were born of the marriage of the plaintifiI and t::e defendant two chilir Sie ; : , : =n ' , wWO COlicreng Tredell County Superior Court, and at the close of the I se ¢ plaintiff's evidence ‘or judgment ye — = . e a “ Are 4 ayn ’ o a ee ay ~2 ” ss rod OL ULe weave “O00Ul LVarOlina 4n o2E oOUper1oO Vu urt Tredel] Pass sredeli vO unty ed 0 a : ter . po ‘ . he niai} ‘a ‘ . 47 to tune tA2LNviss ; fc ‘ hear tr 4+ + ° ys 4 : 4 Tongdian sv US In Waat amount, if any, i: tne daeiendany inh D U IN THE SUPERIOR COURT wp ahh ne SUPERIO T PIRST WEEK <--AUGUS? T RRj: 194.9 Thursday, August 4th,19h9 IN- THE SUPERIOR COURT STRST WEEK --- AUGUST TERM,1949 Thursday, August 4th, 1949 that the plaintiff and defendant have voluntarily acer oo u e o £ M arolin: 1e€ Superior ¢c : : North Carolina In the Superior Court Upon 2 settlement , e aj] matters and things srowing out of the facte forth i st cna a e facts set forth in the complaint 7 ‘ ce PS aatd ne Y yes that by the terus of said acreenent + ndan as | ce eh vue defendant has acreed to vay to t lirs. Georse Stevens, and nlaintiff’ the sum of 3500.00 in full Compromise settlenent é ‘ bil e JUDGEMEN' the plaintiff was present in court with HS Lather, his Next Friend and the court after examining the child and earring the te aud the doctor, Dr. Paul Deaton, who had eare , oa . 3 ~ ~ ™ ee ner — — ee va eadad child aiter lis in " a = . Sach a a ea : =e an ag in of the opinion, aiter full investigation, that thero will nat ffie S. #lowers { . ; witt not be any vere- nanent disability as a result of said accident and that ; This cause coming on to ve heard and beins heard before iis Honor, } nade a normal recovery, and that the settle-ent af ‘entd te Pus , Sences Ina Peaatidine and a tury at the Anevet Civil Term af +h. . ‘ - fpank I.. Arustronc. Judse Presiding and 4 jurv at the august vivil Term of the able, and for tie best interest of sai : 9] ¢ ( ~3aNA te wei si lllOl’. anr 4. : sar ‘ 4 o yyyotr . } + ; Gs) ne fiends & Court of Iredell vounty, ana cue jury naving answered tne 1lssue subd: ted It + 1S, tnereirore oraers i, considered + + : | YS: } niaintitt se AwTAY + Aaf ay, 4 s . n = ee eo ee ree ue pialnviid recover olf tie delena MU, Fie Sum of DiVe » ena tae cost e ‘ in? 3$f anv ic ¢ j ‘a int in >bted t S e nisinti?f? . ut) ad at sd y 1s tne age.enada LHUeove VU wt eA d UL thie a 40” }- rad Wer +) fe be rl ai . in wnat a int, ly y this action to be taxed by this court, in suli, complete and final at : J 4 mse w 4 sv 4 ral! VWOLLaS Ss” s tner ‘TS. vlyde Hoke= l.iother on “, t. Pattler a p oe ee * Me cattley attorney for plaintiff ! This cause coming on to he heard before the undersign ame ote ry , - , , - us no ° sna 5 ab earing ulust Yerm, 1949 of Iredell County syperior Court, and it app ypresentea Y% Ping e fe - 4 ‘. — ol 1 Iad son « minor ( it this 1 im action brought by the nlaintiff, a minor 1! injuries ’ ey > ae + ° 9*s + a : ¥ , S nal Sivde Hoke, as Next Friend, acainst IMicheal Buchkovich for pe rso , ‘ Neh a ahout thes¥ . ia ‘ ‘ ee abou by tue growling out of an automobile accident that happened on or e gvillé 1 of 5tate o oO : 7 a ++ ‘ s . 1 j Sout! of liay,1949, in Iredell Countv,lNorth Carolina, about 22 miles was in the act ” on Hichway No. 21 , while the plaintiff, a boy six years of age, phe co Lan to : ° ‘ ‘ 4 anpearings crossing or recrossing the said Highway at that point, and it api IN THE SUPERIOR couRT = FIRST WEEK'=-- AUGUST TIRE, 1949 ny Thursday, Kusust 4th,1949 4 J3 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a FIRST WEEK == AUGUST TERI,1949 Thursday, August 4th,1949 ; y > . 46 hHoerehyv oa Toul ccc’ (, ae ae Oe eee We Re Pope, 125 nereby appointed a vomuissioner to recovery the sai id ey v the deed above gs u he nee es veal estate Conv yed b ¢ above set out to the plaintirr, ‘ i a, , mrs, iifie oO . +s Te #1 ida a 7 . and deliver the deed to the plaintirr ; Vet liet ’ in tne Huperior vourt, Flowers, ana to 2 1nviil upon t e execution and 4} »7 iy al a aaa ae ; ae tn tue sum of 32,000.00 bearings date of Ne , in ke bs does CC Ons. * august Term,1 Ls e oi a note in ’ : . t Ol vecenoer Re; LY ’ secured by . , , on thie real estate therein conveved iffie 5, Flovers, jeed of trust 0 1 conveyed, ee \ It is further ordered that the cost of thi aimed tIWDU 2 os $A oo ally — ee mg — , ’ 7 P 4 } ‘ | 5 ¢ t . » , » ‘ae. nd wife.Delle { ¢the Court to 2e paid equality oy the plaintiff and the defendant. F. ¢ tol Be We yeaton and Wile, He Deaton. First: ‘fas the deed executed by the plaintiff to the defendant. F. 4 eaton. on December 22, 1°94 ind recorded in deed book <O4, pase 334, in the Yo. 4733 misunderstanding and iu mistake betieen — involved sULVOlLIODLLEe hho ‘AnraAecantan . ate 1999 +n .t1 n , : cn m@ COuDruU represented o CUO vo sus tess “a ° Taw fendny 5 ; : oe ‘ x £ +4 527 “adant will pay to the plaintiff the total sum of prvelely 4 ; ‘ L records t executed by +r’ an Said minor plaintiff are to be reiuours It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged tuat tne deed +r, Book 20h, xenses eau ‘nourred by the and recorded in me v*Ss Nurses bills and other expenses incurree © ‘ I oo ois A to an ; g ae # yer care jurin jeclLaree ” etn bos a ; ° the vliaintiff for extra ca y acc 7.76, inc luding 5810.00 to the mother of tne pia a a A , . i ‘ 1Q) itie o. flowers to F. G. Deaton on Veceiiber 22, 19¢ ° . } AA S - , . go + 7 ’ 7 " ’ » yy c ne re OD 33h, in tie necistry of Iredell sounty, be and the sai.e is | vs mance liospitai 1 Lov “ “otvalescence, medical and hospital bills to tue barn on Dr, me amo ~ nr a: ; Gaul ) . ; 1e sail “unt of ahAn A ; : - LIK Ne ir ve we ZAUisy , ‘2 : a ae ; sq be and t . VFeI0, D J. D. MeLelland 150. : It is further ordered and adjudged that the said deed » Or. W. D. MeLeliana, 400.0. to the minor ’ f ed. edo} ® ‘ P ‘ } m of Ue nvly 0 ctton \reen 545,00, and in addition thereto the sum ol have been executed by a mutual mistake. is hereby declared to be a deed of trust and not a fee simple warr IN THE SUPERIOR COURT em ame THE SUPERIOR CORT WEEK #- AUGUST TERM,1949 FIRST WELK =2-- “AUGUST TER: 10, hursday, August 4th,1949 dnursaay, Aucust 4th, 19h,9° sis — 7 “ for her injuries. The Court after an examination of the plaintiff anq hee pica: Bld _— WORTH CAROLINA, ter hearing the testimony of witnesses introduced in court, includin- vo. me | 2 ae IREDELL UUUs.+l- Gaul @& HeLelland, as to the natrue and exvent of her injuricas of t , oe + ne th: he sai enent if fair and reasonabbe and for tiie ibaa i i ) 4 | IN THE SUPERIOR: COURT IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT SIRST WEEK’ s<= AUGUST TERM, 1949 FIRST WEEK == AUGUST TERM Thursday, Ausust 4th,194,9 Thursday , August 4th,191,4 In the Superior Cour ‘ : uperior Court v9,4650- Nellie Wilson Thomas vs. Randolph Thon as Cont NO« 7 vontinued ‘vo,4071- Marvin T. Houston vs. Patricia H. Houston.--- Jontinued i y7=m=-~ LONtinued 4dZ t gt a ‘ ’ ‘ 6- Myrtle E. .erry vs. Lewis Perry, --....___ 1 ; 0.408 y Ys =w--= vontinued “Hon4589- William H. Ferguson, Jr., vs. Marie H, ferguson, -Continued 0.4703- Grace hi. Hall vs. @, W. Hall, continued yo,4708- Cora 4ee Rowe vs. Golder Rowe, - Cont inued “ob7lbe ie V, Brantley vs. Lola Bell Brantle Continued tio, SP-3370, burs. Bessie 8. Brawley widow R, : ] al, --- Cotinued E, 9. Hayer, Sr. vs. Hoyt H. Yombs Continued i i ~ pn ue. O—— Udon PReslJiNu / IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FLOR], ay sft OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR THE SEVENTH ora ; No.b673<A CIRCUIT, ST. JOHNS COUNTY IN CHANCERY, CASE NO. 9553 °° Le ‘oUNTY OF ST. JOHNS. ¢. S. Johnson, | By Revem Feet, Caees Sieeult Comme, Wh Dutbiet tends @ ins Plaintiff, I in and for St. Johns County, Florida, DO HsRuBy SERTIFY that the above ang ’ Vs. y FINAL DECREE foregoing is a true and correct copy of FINAL JECREB in the suit of c : fo! Ve e JONSON Ruby Viola Johnson, { | olaintiff, vs» Rub: Viola Johnson, Jefendant, as the sane inlet ais Defendant. | inthe office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court IN CHANCERY ORDER BOOK NURBER 27 NUD it 27, ay ns Fy } ; 2P Orde ’ T a pages 600 and 607, public records of St. Johns vounty, *lorida, This cause came on to be heard on this day upon the pleadings, the Reng: a ee ’ part IN WITNESS WHsRSOF, I have herunto set my hand and affixed hereto ee E Jpecia xanine stimony taken herei and it appearing hain of the Special sxaminer and the testimony ken herein, and it appearing to the Court eal of said court this 5th day of June ,AsDe, 1948, the Court has jurisdiction of the parties and tie subject matter of said cause iilram Faver and that the eouities are with the plaintiff and against the defendant, and he is Clerk Circuit Court (SBAL CIRCUIT COURT 32, JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA) ntitled to the relief prayed for in and by his bill of complaint, and the Court hay. same and being fully advised in the premises, it is, thereupon IED AND DECREED that the plaintiff, vc. 5. Johnson, be and > Verified by H. F. hereby divorced, a vinculo matrimonii, from the defendant, Ruby Viola Johnson, Ps : } : . ie p ; “iled in the office of tie Clerk of the Superior Jourt in Iredell n nd the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between said parties are hereby dis- : - ~ ~ vounty, North Carolina on the 5th day of August,1l°h9. J. wilson lefenduant shall have and Deputy Clerk ‘ she It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGE) AND DECRSED that retain the »vermanent custody of the minor children of the parties hereto, to-wit: le Johnson, fegsy Irene Johnson, and Betty Sue Johnson. s ; a waa P . @ Inhneon 004727 It is further ORVERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff, C. 9. vonnsm, we ‘ . 5 . . . ey : a e Thirty (330 00) orth Carolina n the Superior Jourt “ all be ordered, directed and required to contribute the sum of fulrvy \eder' Iredell ¢ ap SUSE Sos VEN m ” vounty Before the Clerk there- V, lars on Saturday, the 12th day of June, A.D., 1948, and on each saturday eon os . Jol rs on 1 U 12t 1 » Y L + ’ 4 ’ sconomy “inance Company, Inc. I \ ehae 2 a and maintenance after until the further order of this Court, as and for the support and main . aie ee: So la nn VS. | JU Jind ji VULUNdaitl wUlWouUld he mino 2H ‘ > haw “YY Ae eataA ey o ~— oO 4 ; +} e eristr ol tne : of the minor children above named; said sum to be paid into tne r Y janes Caldwell | é t ‘ . , + - . s ea inal decree in Juvenile Court of Duval County, Florida, as provided by law and tne final ee ; . : \ Florida, for + this cause is hereby referred to the Juvenile Yourt of Duval County, Florida, This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Superior Court : aammendations im ih sollection of the sum required to be paid hereunder and makes its reeumene of Iredell County, and it appearing that the parties in this action have reached ti resard to said collections. a aisha agreement and that there is ho longer any controversy in this matter, and ; DONE AND ORJSRED in Chambers at St. Aucustine, St. Johns vou Ys On a motion for a judgement of voluntary nonsuit by We &. Pope, attorney for $ae | hj y at fe oT 9),8 tna ' this the 4th day of June A.D., 1948. se seein ace salntift it is therefore ordered and adjudged that a judgment of nonsuit be | | ‘ “SIACUIT JUDGE. “d ishereby made. nents: ‘ : : : the plaintiff. Feled June 4th,A.D.,194é, It is further ordered that the costs of action be paid b p at 2:19 O'clock P,™, 14 RUE RECORD This the 19 day of Aug,1949. \ Lf 4 itu TY) 1,°/" T d i" ia” . REC nD LE Tub La Go. G. Ymith Hiram Faver, Clerk Vircuit Court Tlerk superior Court By l.arie Copps, Deputy Clerk VERIFIED BY: Me C. (i te ste t ste ste 34 No. 4739 ] 0 4726 NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Vourt, aT CAROLINA IR’vDeLL COUNTY. Before the Clerk, raRDELL COUNTY ‘ity O atesville, a Qn nts “ 9 vy of Statesvi 9 C, hilholland “nicipal Corporation. Vs. JUDG:.ENT OF VOLUNTARY NONSUTT peaicea de Ve 4 Bruce Vanderburg. j. i. Pierce and Lillian Pierce, This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Superior sountv of Iredell vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing that the parties in this action have reached an Defendant arreeme hat ne i nger ar r ers j his m me ' pre nt and that there is no lon er any controversy in this matt or, and upon a mo j r a j men of Y ta \ Ss 1] VY \ I } ¢ orne f- \, * ¢ 4 7 cor ‘ motion ior Jud; ment volun ry nonsuit by W. R, } Ope, attor ney ior the plaintity, NALS C2)Se comings on to therefor ‘dered and adjudged that a judgment of nonsuit be and is hereby ke uperior Court the foreclosure of tiie 1; action be paid b> the plaintiff, erihed in tie com: ymith - ™ int out the umount wuperior Vourt ertilicate showine ction 171 a : > © rt oer A ey 244A YLiCL roperty hereinafter toe lien of redel] upon motion of .oodhouse & .aru, ° ‘oo ve er ed and decreed t he plaintifi, vit rior liam, except that Iredell County ha: lien ~ 2 4 } Pry taxes arcel or tract néreinafter described fort + : . + ask ve “WA interes: . ‘ ‘.Jlowine years and in the followin, terest, penalties and costs ie following years and OUnts : PRINCIPAL ITERA PENALTIES AND COs3T3 USTS. )30. O05 27632 20.16 18.82 16.90 atornevs in the amount of 15.00 and co ‘pensation to the Co ae ae ; mis amount of 5% pf the purchase price of said rx gal estate, O~IWV0 ne" OC or inoumnemmbalins his hands into the Court for ag their interest And this cause This the lst : uperi or Court and decreal tha axes due it in the amount set forth in the ounty of tredell in t.is use, upon the that of plaintiff, County of : is hereby preserved. real estate upon wich this judgment is lien is locate Iredell County, North varolina, ~ Ol] oF treet Statesville, North va 1 ot see Plat of tur id k place. dake f Deeds of Iredell County p Book 3 ce is also made a deed from state-vil.: at page 555, Iredell ederce and wie, ‘orever foreclosed. ny surplus t12 sioner to sell said rea , it sne Courthous 10¢ j Tred Coun v; for tnirt) for four successive We _ ed in Irede y, and said Comuissioner ba wsseu except the lia of such art of this judpme and shall deliver imple to the purchaser, subject ‘iowever, ide County, Flori this lien on said property. e County, ’ ee ee a : . — F I % 7.9 id sale, made rep rt ner 1 AY e arshall C. «i sehe and yetze And it is further ordered and adjudged tnat from the | “led this 18 arsi > “0rd 4 ce Jan,A.4. 1LOL9 yircult Sommissioner shall pav to the pla 1intiff and to the defendant, BB. . § 19 day of Jan. ADe1949 - a = so | der Book 691 on page 219 A True . rk's 0 ffice. witness : } | ‘. file in tne Cle c mount of the taxes, penalties, interest and costs adjuage Bo. on Court my hand and official, seal this + sinal on ; : a 22 r of FebeaAs said real estate, and the costs of this action, including 4 fee fo | Deputy 3 rant Clerk Circuit Court Date County, Florida — By G. Ohenender, De Ve Wiled in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court | , North Carolina on the 2nd day of September, 1949. in Iredell Vounty vether with the costs of this action, ’ That the real estate upon which this tyud- “ee Judement is a lien is located oS YEAULed aad O e G. wmith Ulerk Superior ar : " yLerk Yourt narnesl Township, Iredell Count; Nort snarpesburg rs /ount orth Ca in: i dd 5 oa th Caroli a, and is more particy). ’ ai icul rly iescribed as follows: : FIRST TRACT: Adjoining Tilden Morrison T } a . and 2 l.arloy ] } wrticularly described as follows: *s ++ ..arlow and others ‘ Beginning at a locus tree, then south 80 dace ite oak; thence south 8 degrees west 78 poles to a eee) West 54 poles to ecrees east 40 poles; thence east 30 poles oes ce thence north 50. ecinning, cont: ining 30 acres wore i Sees os ,ovone; thence &5 poles to the “omnship, "Iredell County, N.C. meee Shown 2s Greenland in Sharpesbi SCOND TRACT: id joining the rly described as follows: Beginning at yak; thence north ©3 ea f west 99, poles to a sta red i Sumers' line; thence north a thence south 26 west 47 tnence north 0323 west 19 pole Ss to : : ab rn ° etaka =r oe est ll poles toa s /AKE, yhurch lot. corm: : stone, Je i. SUMucrs' corner; thence n sntaining O06 acres, more or less, fF “ : ea . ‘ ‘ 9 to tne Court tnat ee 1S an acti ror TH 7 I's: Lon for nit taul$3; AO acre tract i sht, titie is sf ’ nwife, !.. C. Somers (Sum -orever foreclosed ve been properly served with : pos + } S « . ’ 4 era fondant it further appearing that the derendanve, >, Yomers (Sumiers), filed no answer, demurrer, OF — tine within Jomers (voumme might answer Wt 2 , . he plaintilg woodhouse & ward, attorneys for the psainii-§ Tredell, nas firs a the plaintiff, the County of of real estate reinafter described + togetaer with pena costs, for the following years and “€ Said Comms c<4 oe as Toe within three following amounts: ‘nd it further ordered and adjudged that from the proceeds of the sale F ™ : vot ans na iff and the amount the taxes, penalties, “8Sioner shall pay to the plaintiff pa and the costs of ‘Oo HW i . WWW LD Wk “arest and 5 1s a Costs a ijudged to be a lien upon said real esta ate he amount of 3500 W ro |} Ww “S$ action. 4 : ; ' *neluding a fee for the plajntiff's attorneys in t £ t of the purchase price 0+ vr = i+ ** SOtpensat4 5 * ation to the Commissioner in the amount of 57 “4 Peal ; : s ‘ he court estate, and shall pay any surplus remaining in his hands into tue ppeare — — * dstributs ution to the defendants as their interest may 4 = VRP O NC OOO > ww and this cause is retained for further orders. This tr 1e 2 d ‘ Gs Ge Smith ’T rt ay of September,1949. Tierk of the Superior vou on eee 2 c ‘ Ww \O oa 2~) / No. 47321 yoRTH CAROLINA. In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY R, le Jones Va. JUDGMENT W. Re Cooper his cause comins e heard bef 4 4 This omine on to be heard before His Honor, C. G, smith, Clerk of the Superior Court, of Iredell County, and being heard and it appearing that the sumnons and the verified copy of the complaint was served on the defendant on Aurust 9,1949, the suit beine on a promissory note; It further appearine that no answer has been filed by the iefend- ant and that more than 30 days has elapsed since te service of the sum:ons and the complaint in the cause. It is therefore ordered ard ad‘udre ha he plaintiff, recover of the defendant. W. R. Vooner. the on at the rate of Six per cent per annun ne cost of this action to be taxed by the This the 27 dav of Sse tember. , Ge G, omith Clerk Superior oe 4729A ays OF NORTH CAROLINA a PPP AP Arr 4 tld it VOURT, No ” 465 8 nee sleet ea Ta a re North Carolina In the Syperior Court vamty OF BUNCOMBE. Iredell Countv souNTY OF BUNCO:.B E. S. Hager @ vicie Taylor, JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INCUIRY Plaintiff. Vs. jeorge Washineton Taylor This cause comins on to be hear: } I 0 se co ard before the Honorable ¢, G. Smith, ea ae Slerk of Superior Court of Iredell ¢ t N : Defendant. ve Olt L ouperi L ( y \ h (fe oe , , Uy u > e vOun » ortn vVaroiina, upon the motion of ymer, Attorneys fo he plai teen } . MTs OAlpa: ae , ; ' er, 4 Ss r tn plaintiff, for judg ient by default am ine into VAUVOD Comins on to be nearc before tne undersi ned qULPy; Judce presidine na | 1 » cules nt Ter 7} "y and hold the regular september Teri, 1947, of the Superio s Y v + f r vourt of Buncombe pearing h ur ) Mareh 25 C ae . 1 9 4p py ant jae } ari: to the court that on March 25, 1949, a sumions was issued vounty, and a jury, and veins heard, a: all the issies n rt - 4 c a canta za a le . ™ t ae : ¢ is “ an orger issued on said date extendins the time for filine inthe affirmative and in favor of the in t1is action until April 9,1949; and, m pears of record in this cause: earing to the court that said su. 3 WaS returmd endorse IT IS, THEREFORE, upon motior inv not iound”™ on April 4, 1949 and that on the 7th plaintiff, considered, ordered ard lias sum.ons was duly issued by the court in this aid how existing between the ~ 49, the duly verified cmplaint of the plaintiff in this action ie hereby forever dissolved; tat Said alias sym:.ons tovethor with a copy he lai svorce from the defendant here on April 13, 13949; and, FURT '=R, URDERED to the court that no answ: r, demur or other plead- no extension of time file pleadin:s which pleadinrs may be filed has epi ‘eb V. Nettles in daf Judge ‘residinc. refore ordered, adjud-ed and decreed that the plaintiff hav 1inst the defendant for such damages as the jurv may awar 8! a * 3 } ap ay ; ter the amount of said damages be executed at tre next civil tem a rt of Ireiell County, before a jurv todetermine the amount 0} ss iled office of the Clerk of superior Court in iredell Jounty, th . +Mal varo ina | r ; ) “ina, on the 17th day of Uctober, 1949. 7 h ¢ ge . | } | 1Utnhuay of October, 1949, ae Smit! Tlerk superior Court Ce. G. Smith Clerk Superior vourt a a 7 2 he e pd iO i rl No. 4564 It 28 therefore, upon tiotion of “OOANnouse & Ward. att ae, acvtorneys for the NURTH C aROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court { plaintiff, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the ‘i. has a first and prior li ae | ita ta and prior lien, except that iredell plaintiff, city ; OL otates- IREDELL COUNTY se vounty has a lien of ve ° lve " . : equal dignity, upon that parcel or tract of ren} est: i evt eState hereinafter described C4 t of »t Ave SV 1iji€, } interes : . unelyp } vVorpor: \ one ‘e e , terest, DE d CC t l ‘ < ’ © scr st pen id e Sa Q 2O0¢ ts, fo “ O. y 7a I 4 i 4d in t 3 O e ) ing amounts: P. Campbell, widow; anpbell, sinsle; aupbell and wife, Campbell; Henry T ingle; Jorcas vampb lusbend, Re Be hi : aupbell Beaver paver; and Ee ¢ < ~ + } ; - . eard nefore the undersigned Clerk an action for ‘= ria r taxes due the plaintiff upon real estate descrined pe eae oe eS RS ts FA a pearins to the vourt that action, filed a duly verified Souplaint settin inst said real estate nd now riles a proper 4 together with the costs of tiuis 1id property, 4s -— , “- } ; ’ » men ed: $t lurtner oraer od, a 1 ud ; n iecreed tha Oo An uous, v of Iredell, iias a lien for taxes due it i action nave ’ , - “ve a AUG 2 Ah : : tae answer filed by cats Cio within the time recuired by iled by the said Count; bs property hereinafter describec , anual dirnity lattie P. Campbell, widow; ; einafter described, of esual dirnit) vity - oaeuws 7 = ’ . . ~ . SP Pew wife. larie Hodges Caupbel; ity of Statesville, and that said lien of the vounty ol Iredell, re os , aca ~ ‘ >” i ste preserved, ‘ampbell lantz and husband, te &- hantZ; ory lmer eaver: filed no answer, demurrer oF that the real estate upon which this judgment is Slmer L. Beaver; nsw . sa] in otatesvilie ‘ovmshir : tats Ct ” lowed by law and that the tine within which > township, iredell vounty, noeie Ba" : 4 rly de , ¢ - a < ‘ ¢.9 © Paul Campbell, 54% as follows: Lackey's corner, tiuence with ais idll's line, crossing oranch, ers corner; thence otreet 15 P, Campbell, .idow; James line conten worming on Urake Street, Joie lin oh. 9) he 4 oe i aeprrees west 30U feet tO de tie ae Beaver and hus- a a the branch 45 feet with the Hill line, irs. Uilicr: i 74 degrees with $06 feet to Drake Street; t.ince with UraKe bs te I inni walt et to the bes¢inning. ‘ 4 . se : es ' ‘amnbell, sins+® varie Hodges Va:pbell; Henry 7’, Campbell, § antz; Jorothy Campbell ind husband, &. 3. iff has exp vrs. liattie P. uight answer t.e complaint of the plaint ie All the right, title and interest of the defendants, Campbell and wife, her a pearing that the defendant, County of Iredell has :; prevent “poell, \idow; Jaues Paul Campbell, singie Jjilliam i. answer in whih no issue was raised and that such answer did not seek to } . t ‘21 Hodges c- ‘ sia shai ee cas Campbell iantz t odges Campbell; Henry J. campbell, single; Dorcas vat Beaver and husband, cluer Le . a. a1 os a * *4% : ” in tne Foreclosure sale of the property nereinafter described in the compla ; id ad hus ae eer e it on 58 sband, R. 3. iiantz; Dorothy Campbell red and forever foreclosed, ution of any surplus due Seaver sy . for taxes » in and to said real estate is hereby bar property, to be preserved and to be of equal dignity with the lien *XCept prayed judgment declaring the lien of Iredell Countv, for taxes du as to their right to participate in the distrib the plaintiff; that :.ay result from the sale nerein authorized. ; 5 . : eens i 61 it is furthered and adjudged that lhoel i. 5. \oodhouse be and m ue is Se : : le a er ae sad pais ieee: So oe i RTH UanwOLtaves hereby appointed Vommissioner to sell said real estate at public auction fop NO he ic bid wt } IREDELL COUNTY to the hichest bidder, at the vourthouse door in Iredell County after IREDE ; 1 L. Arey, Individu ° * and tradi ey ae st 4s and tradin Le . istributing Vompany of said sale at the Vourthouse in Iredeli Vounty, for days preceding said sale, and also advertising once reeks in some newspaper published in Iredell County, and seli id real estate free and clear Jf ali encunbrances LE such taxes and special assessments as are not Ga 3 2 id shall ueliver a deed conveying said real estate in fee bject however to tne lien of any speci ad So@SSiLer property. and the said Vommissioner will, within 4 varee tiereof to the Court. “ } - + » “AN - judged tuat From the pt intirt and to the : , interest and co ction, inc] PE aes a EF - eae: 2 = $ + 4 ° am : ew into the vourt ior uistrii ht |! 1) i, | 4 i ined for furt..er crders. ’ ’ ++} ve Ue Wiitbss ee — ae aE Te Slerx of tne superior vourt —_—- ctober,1 L ‘* Uli T™, 7 abil aay 3raa Uvercasn e tern Aa ev ween hate Att Aw VeVi 4+ ed oud + c+ de oO +2 ieie vin he te 30) ~r-le CS ce ~ » o 3 3 Ud y ACA as r) m the 15t . ereon itr + u our — U 7 ita Ge Se Clerk ouperior at ad 4 | ,ontinued IN THi TIRST WEEK 2m remembered th it ® a ee ee “ 2a ye eee a es On 2 ON et CS ON + or ier rT Tor ‘ovember 7th,19), T | ay COU! sim T 5 4s Ormer NOVisi] SUPERIOR ES d under 13 i Sin von } ‘ - bw Jo Gay, u IN T lion ’ SSed and the = a rt & ° o @ aS ® —{ a4 “dd V dismis nf / HR »L94, j t 2, € C 1.00reS\ ) OW T tae T % 4 y id TOR C 7th,l appeal { . soak ery WOYV. 44°itD mber hat the ourt. ouUP love aid C ar wc i.onday, Io a ~ 5 VV ed it is ordered t anded - 5 ) Vaedild 2 aed ;on The defendant having appealed from vourt, case r Capias. iio eceaet ee ee ee a ae ae at ae “0 red Pierce IN Ti ‘ man XxX fPliokl wOooOh . 9 . ce Ian $ _ ‘ ,onTIUea ZOr Wii Ee ™ 1 hed _ SUP EXTOR COMT - WOVL)Bir TER. 1949 jonday, lwovember 7th,1949 The defendant having appealed from l.ooresville Recorder: Court, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed and tie case remanded to said sah and cost. . Court. o ? he "O0U il 1. Judgeent Nis& , yount, e Jou .ission, bibed Ja ‘ behavior and ——— uLUR COURT -- NOVEMBER TER , Set ood 4 dha November 7 } 1914 Viby 1949 sel Lne f = 4 ,sevent the dei é Ol i 6h): es 3 A i a 6 yet —— et a 4 i @® 4 i. > et © 42 3 SS o > = ‘ - ~ ; © - { 4 12 i> + 4) ¥ 1 ¢ thdrawr. ar & to 4 ea. ——< <tc ee ee > * 5 > see C °° i thy _> »m . id te ,O y ~ c ‘ Ym ® oO ® a = “ »@ eG a = ae * 2 ee a ) + 2 OF1E ey y inued ,0nt ’ A et oe “4 a a. 2£ Contin > ent "Oe 126) vons by nued ntl 40 ' ) IN TH. SUPLRICR COURT t 7 NV COURT FIRST WEEK ©-— NOVELBER TERM 1LOL9 F [RST WEEK oe Vin) , | , ; t ; on t ! j a0 QAvemhan ° } ak . honday, November 7th,191,9 lLonday, November 7th,191, se t sal Lit Peo. Of jate of Appointment FO 9/20/43 a | lyf bly 1/11/46 si/ec /) 7 L4/2/ 4+ 10/4/45 39/99/17 at) AO HS Ina lic a/yt o/ D/H? é Je 42 aac 2/45 ec cot erer keer wie Acsie ‘ See af mE DES x Grere 33 xX JAY fe AS “? No. 32 ) ASSAULT wITe pranry wee ~~ ak / es eit N State The Solicitor moves that this case be restored to the vs docket. It is ordered oy the Court that the case be and same is hereby restored to the docket and capias issue Lee F. Blivens for said defendant. "o. 908 state vs 3 Teague, Principal RE. Chandler, Surety 4 SCI FA ON SOND wl é ) Order heretofore entered is stricken -_ - oe ) judgment on the Sci Fa is hereby cancelled of rec Qo Q Ty : on payment of the cost of Sci Fa. fais Honorable Court leon 4 ad a ae Tar submitte ’ 2 tespectively Su a. | ai Eo} eager c, 1914.9 at 9:30. J. jue Stevenson Sad dS ssistant soreman »* trand Jury. pie WA, | Teo 1VING IN THE SUPERIOR COURT eee Guivee” eee ae ee : rn 19L9 tN a OUP 4A GOURT Yirst »eek- - November Term IL9 “T2597 JEEK «< rare — 1 Tuesda November sth,1949 PO Lu iUWesa a i A ? Tuesday, hovelber 5th, 1919 te CO 3 we - mim . : ’ ’ my : sourt convenes according to adjourniien Uesda } (BANDON NT ALD nonesl rt Thi wNWuQY he &/ ' eo 2 war an Ym i { (Continued fro ~ 4 +OU ” Way ¢ } a “2 : : a a 1 3 j Ll. ‘that the defendant vy inte ¢ ne i Ve Olly ‘y7 @ _ vs a = 444500 UNE OLIice f' + + ? 8 . pas ) ey r Court . >, oe ate ee + Vile v i : . 4 s+ VY + v 2 | = 4 win glui Ore _ ‘ 4 IL» ry t ae . a 4 > . e nn : ) Vas Lf ou vO ‘ e oOo} Venuber lL . : v . as @ . . “2 i "#9 % me ce An ON : wUl y U reaitery bs t aw tacks ae ap tin Mt, lirvy re rned ay ta af 4 to EC ; ag - xe : eMMEO Vs Ul ,0Urt 7. 1 OO) ' \ < ar ANT) AwwiVaid © ine Jul rou 44104 v rai ot Ol ‘ULLty, a uv © ms o wwe Me . ve +Uy ’ - r = > a ti. Sa €¢ lhe 4- . £* ~» ‘ “a ars x { * . ° 1 Judvment of the Court is tnat tne deiencants be confined i, fe shu j 7% -OSt th Stio ~ ye T “ » fh 1 } +3 t° , ‘ ei . * . sth _ = S Te 16) peer ’ y 4 ; 3 = ees vw be VA A I trie Com..on d ail ot iredell yvOUNTY LO ‘ erica of BIGHTEE 4 vanuary iern, ly hs } iat h re nm . - ; . ’ } ’ . hd “OR, .r ’ mes Vs J ’ fiers - a ‘ ° - 4 » )-¢ 117, AY ij 2 . 2 4 4 ~ 4 Us 30 rewer=2 { ,.ONTHS and issigned to work under tne Supervision of the Stor. mm villcan <i camer aneaeeal i Uh Ue a ‘ 9 ’ 1 : Y eee vvall — = ve pe 4 ™ 4 . i cas jerce-/,3 d¢ehway and wublic \.orxs vomluilssion. £220 41 UCI uC S own recor: j 4 De t vier r — ed 2 eae ie ia n+ ehhe the oF } oe Sa : 0 on a ‘ ’ 7 r oy oan aaah A . t fe ears to the v urv tnat 1€ USL ClLUdchyU ( ert fierce . Soa dha a rance ¢ be 4 5 : / + v eVEWY 20 q ‘i . lial ¥ “ x Vad t as a se a a aa * pu a i sOULl L OF > Tredel y for ¢ ; t Vs a TC AS whe ote ‘ - Vw a6 Uo we er - - 1 i‘ evuner $10n U = ‘ ry d and assicned to work under tae Supe sday Morning ee L.CiTHS and assigned CO, Wore oo sesion rence iSf This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday = WOPKS VO. inSSi . is sentenc® U nt of the defendant in oj Nove Se mer 15th, 1949 at 10:00 O'clock. we 2GeCa JL COU LULU e next pase) TAI MIT ATIDNRT “ ym LN THE SUPERIOR CC URT r py] a. : en on 7 i June , An Eaakia COND WEEK om NU VihiBit Tari, 1949 in t 6 3U} Crd or Jourt ; . HOON wWintK wm 5, 191.9 OibUVas hr. < & O).¢ V suds, Tuesday, lovemper 15 »t9h9 ea aur : ae Lut: IL9 LUESAaAy _ * Ovemoer tota,l ho Z si = a } 7 , +n y +4 . ’ a ROLINA, in the ouperior Court, NOe 4,671 vaewin Te Housto: { PATI nh m 7 ie - i Ss 1 i 7 ’ ry November lerm, 1949. harvin te ou ¥ oa Vie | Ane Jlvorcee Jyurv / 1" ad y 2 } Bae ¢ nn) . a 2 Gaal AU" Ory ’ , A YVIF KD Y c + ¢ } * - I Aye . Jo “WHS ds 4iQ , : ; Honorable Court convenes scording Go Ljourniuent o} ue y ‘ | Ste answered tri : oi citae - eu oc aee Se tc uni oki 4 . e tU0ueS ¢ mit ‘ i ‘ atri cl1é iiar tsel 4. liouston { v i 7 Se a i ft 4 4 yalri : yh ' 7 ( tClock +t - y ] ' : i 7D + + 4 Pt)” ) ae. Ge su Vi ob on } { Pro sn oaths eas ; ; min i love CY f ls | L t = ? Waa i Va r bit dae Th Urons, q = } } q NOAH Vateue tive’ I q . * . +o ’ A ” " — a ve 3 . oe ° . 7 T)} : a kk ‘ 4 ar S$ AS ne nd Holding v sur ct a tnise tne £ 1iteentn dvudicial strict 4 lnoolbe ve Lovemper er LQ) i PUES 4 2 ~ - ass ’ Vy 4OLhiyg LY o si varvin T. fiouston <— <a 4 J db Letill vOil bse Lif d j . ; ; 5 yi ltl he irrenie ” | ial allt THE SUPERIOR COURT wUSK ee NOVEMBER TERL.,1949 lay, November 15,1949 Jurv ;3", beine duly s issues submitted to it intiff ass ‘wer nereoy . at T OU Ves rernrs ? jlerk, Frank = : JUVUe GVOURT t ' 4 SUP LALO THE 1 N i! » L949 -4 f= ON 3+ e4 oN A * rg uth 9 4 r be ) ub NOVisi mbe wOVE ! i i a na os & J mP Io - 4 7 Oo o OQ ® a> yo -— aa — q ° - e: ”~ ‘ ~ Oo 2 mS C) T+ WY V \ 2 — ra YD ted 4 ¢ ~ 4 "9 Cc) 4 © ©) 4) et VY 42> oO c4 — <a 44 de SUPER dds IN THE SUPERIOR COUR’ SECOND Ww luk = NO i BR TER. 194.9 Tuesday, November 15,1949 \r ‘ a. V Jit The Jivorce Jdurv .1" being duly sworn 4 answers the issues submitted to it as N06 Jennie IN THE APTN t wt due dad vdaulody y R 1 ly Li Dit [wh m aaa 1 : suesaay overnber 15 31 4aY, lovenber 15,1949 4764 Rentley Barnette ior two Ve int’ “ewer. TEORe" ory for the plaintiti, Bentlev Barnette. ’ . Ts . Romusue een the , | « nanvee G» Price,’ attorney Now t ierefore on il otion ol Yeo! @ Ue oe o T nnie 453 OC lmone ft a —— “9 ae ‘ . zi . 2 ntitil ve 1 cS ar rdered, adjudeed and decreed that tie pl — si the defendant, bootie! sne is hereby ‘ranted an absolute divorce trop va stint betw oe = : atrimony neretoiore oa : “e Sarne . 7 ; ’ : ’ } plaintire ©? nd that the bonds of ma nereby dissolved. . and the defendant be and they ‘the plaintiff pay the acts and it is furtl ordered that tne pee~ ’ . &tion te 15 iurtner oO C Jule to be taxed bv the Clerk. frank ive Armstronhs Thle KT “y : —e Minis the 15 day of November, costs of this presiding 19496 TN THE SUPER LOR wor SaCOND WOK fuesday, ’ Ade VwseVi } iii if rs & ; _COURT e--- MOVEIBLR TeR.,1949 November 15,1949 he issues submitted Jivorce Jurv 1", IN THE ‘ YEUUNU woah My al. suesa A, orotna AgaNS Osborne we - es Voe i eee ts svorne gobert il. won TH TREDLL: Jorotha ere the pl rt continac be lorever dissolve Vv 79 j —e SUPER Trp MUr RAiled —— ayy Vioagd 9 Lovembe 18 76! , -t 15,194 cl lrom the defendant, kobert taxed arai ’ mm CVUOURT , > Means wit Lok) © » af 1nt7 whdivae + he rnstrong THE SUPERIOR COURT +] » QUPERICR COU; WESK = NOVEMBER TERD,19L9 WV Utut VEE j November 15,191° 7) OWUUIN mm tT 2 > mm OY Ve Oo 1 it Jivoree Jury th e issues i qq ye ‘Ee 2c ‘ear. Vovella oummers liller Javia oe + refore Vile leu I , eg > . 2 ff 4 ie ' “+ 4 i y hie ret dis vsd + ofore existinre between SS on a ae ‘ht LAX larry Vanie.s sreby dissolved, and children, Larr — >st interes f : } children would be servea J the defendant. . sya sg ne cu i Sie beins L i ,> & Lib person ior t } “ },Q ot November, 1947 « a vf patre } bh Q D ery ae 2 ; D hat tne bonas i) AINW Uilbvilioss 4 pyel . - 4 e, We — ld ,dant be, and the same ieretofore existins betwee he 1 f and defendan ’ 6 } des le : om the e 1 ; P e . yorce .¥ ,issolved, ana tne anted an absolute di —<—S HoH . } mw a 7 Pisa oy aul ai rT iN iJ ’ UVUUL dade be abe WAAL an ’ HUW 1 2 ar LUeCSU, ’ v 1 e ad ey a = S=w SSS —_ — Ss a ee — euiaanat sai a ee ~~ seo = <= = ne ~ - . ~ = rd pa ~ 4 : : : 4 oF I s > 2 ! . ' > i : ! i ' : { > > | ~ 1 °P a es : ~ * > <4 2 319 4 i : + a ort > > o meee Ne ee ee ee ; ae . cr. a 5 , > . . ‘ . 3 o : c> 49 > ; { 3 4 “~ ~ > . ; so ° > 5 ~ . , F > ‘ rg : i ° . ‘ . . ; oO LN ° - i O00 U i ‘ ) 5 : j > > 4 ” es = ” “~ . ? . a “~ > . —. ) ~ ) - 3s Ls m4 2 shaxes ns <2 ia aos. r> S4 4 — oo os . > @ i; = — ir ' - a ea V 4 “ oo os ea . SS . oo 2 i : ™ ? c Oo * + ' ‘ =~ i | 2 | ‘ ® } 2! . . . : ' — ps ~ } i “~ - I . . . ' a ‘ ‘ + ° “ . ”~ = ‘ ™ ”~ 506 = = a me < oe ee ee _ ee SE PET A SOOT OO ee en mn — _— E z e Me EAR es E . : ers = —_— sag aan 7 ai BR is Bes Ss FS ae 7 sede Wit waved es 5 ~ = ~~ > og -_ . = a * : 2 : ome ‘ re aH Sas a ~ 4 jas my Rt soni J ”~ c.f ¢ < re) 2c > rt > 2 & 3 © I= 2 wos Gan - J HH our [ WOV "! iN ) ursd: 4 ~ J > 4 de o~< _ . 2 - i ‘ > 4 oO hot tee oe = 4 > > “~ o “ : 4 ) , : : y > © 5 > . 4 4 > ‘ 4 5 4 > ¢ 4 ; 4 i > > ‘ - * i > “ F - ”~ « a : 3 - : = § : 1 4 > G4 > > - “ + e * . : ’ » > c ‘ n 3 D ° 2 . ~ M4 3 re : “4 ‘ “ig +> > 42> ; > 4 4 o; : < — C4 + 4 ‘ oO » . < S > . c ° ‘ ¢ a ‘ . 3 @ > m4 > re} : 4 a 3 : ‘ “4 Sa @ 4 @ re) o $ aa s = 7 or 4 £e S : ; é ~ ? & be 4 ' 4 > 3 4> > » © ~ : w > OQ Oo ¢ > +> 1 4 : . > c > > s3 4 : 4 4 : i) © « > | i ¢ . Sa 4 5 " ® . > > 7 c : . 2 { : > re ; “ « : 7 ff O 4- 1 4 ¢ as 4 © ~ ' ° ~ “a 4 . . + j > oe 0 > - = . c ~~ M4 4 4 7 ¢ 4 - » hy is ~< + : 3 : . ) > t) l 4 { ] . ! : | . | i : ° = + | - . 1 e : . > © q) “~ + . ” = w~ . 0) i “ + co > 4 “aa © q > eret 2Onl ere rae ~ reiore, Qe recover ca ® x QO - > . c a 2 a4 ~ - ® = Oo Bo » c be - 40 1, ne er } Ua the by ced & u action to be o i?) of thi ne SU CO wae de Yr, 194, +4 wovembde g ws u a COU > \Q > ‘ w ~ YY < A = > ‘ . q . 4 t » om SG oO ¢ “4 C . : “4 wu ‘ 9 M ¢ © O ho ra © a ~ : » 3 $4 . - 4 > 4 Ss » p Oo Sa ert G4 ‘ ce C S a ~ = » Oo > TRE TTD STITD TTD TOM ’ IN T Liu OUI fat dbUat COURT a“ t ? ads wa WwOolh #22 Via B ye oR ) : NU Vi Wut 4 Oi 19! 9 LI 1 P+ +7 i on — oBUUWD Ww Jods. Thursday, November 17th,1949 fhursday lhe Is the Petit ion or, described in iLvision, Yo. 12y2 rose TTT} State r ~ Bike i- + Th . icmert of the Court is that the defendant impris- ae he tfomen Division of the & ' ison irs Robert L. Pierce Raleigh a eee oe iieumeiins The deferdant is allowed to be released ard to appear at office ol Clerk of this Court on caturday Morning Novemoer 19, 1949 at 10 O'clock to begin her sentence. Ko. 1273 & 1271 aN 4 RI33RY AN ASS ATIEA Stat sneaak tan - The judgment here behaet the following entere Pierce Judgment of the cour tofore entered is stricken out and d in lieu therefor; t is that the defendants and each Bobo y Srener of them be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell and assigned to work County for 4 periof of TNELVE MONTHS, Highway and Public Works under supervisio: of the State Commission. It appears to Pierce is blind. the Court that the defendant Rovert , ot 37 tne ullen ide sherrii+y) ” perty describes ** s fF the pro . . @ ci o g a pesond . D : ‘ _ 4 » ) 2p » . a4 ¢ r ” > ~ r e 4 at ” 5 - ‘ nn ~ ) 3 aS . > ° “¢ » o® . 6 o “ . 4 = «6 . => = * ' ~ > 4 Sn . ' - cs *3 = orf G4 ‘ ¢ E 5 — s - - e o> > ©® 2 * ® ry oO “= = c = . > c . 4 : act ne «4 OY S “A ro ” o : ) - ' : : : 4 “ . Ppue ie { “ = . © - o, o 1D “ - oe @ M4 2 é - 4) 4 tO 4-0 6 oe €. >, rs 1. » 44 O@ rs { : a o ps3 > Q Prieae : : . vu . * rr? ,? a i= “ ° 2 $3 esc Oo O92IPO ‘ e 5 “ 1 ¢ = + a4 > © @ ®2 LY ~ > ay 2 , i ° ‘ . ) 9 M4 3 Sw orf " ° { OS cP fe ~ - > ° se ; : Oo 0 oO - a > of @ - ° . 4c a pOota ov ~ e = Me u = 4 ”- - m4 © ri ¢ ¢ = t 4 > 2 4 _ > ' c « ’ : : 5 } > 2 ‘s S4 ; ot € 5 5 > c > - a @ 4 t< ms ~ - r % 22 : ‘ Ss ; < 3 - $ > > 4 f—.4 =a 5 ON 2 o . + + .~ ~~ fx ¢ | Be &e ~?> F4 a | ~ oi -4 — a - OmY > j or o | O04 | 2 At & 4 > = and 4 ! 4 im = r | ~ <)O P a ; i= & 4 + i ouP Vv * on « ; E~ f-] > » i 3S IN ee } ' ‘ ‘| ' q i | ; ' a eee Free on ee tes romp Pog we 7 J A— —~A1 WA ——— \ ——— OO ee ee ene No. 4735 NORTH CARULINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT REDELL COUNTY Louie \Weaner Plaintiff Vs. JUDG NT A. B. Harmon Jefendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before llis Honor ) >, G. Smith, Clerk of th Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing we to the Court from the statement of Counsel that all matters set out in the pleadings have been agreed upon by the parties, and that the defendant has agreed in oe to pay to the plaintiff, that the plaintiff has agreed to accept the sum of 3100, sa v eV and the costs of this action in full satisfaction thereof; Now, therefore, dy consent, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that tie and recover of the defendant, the sum of 5100.00 and the costs of be taxed by the Clerk. the 16 day of December, 1949. ‘ n C. G. Smith Clerk Superior Court. consent: Louie V. .eaner_ —— LOULe .eaner woodhouse & woodhouse & Plaintiff We. R, Battley W. Re Battley,Attorney for Defendant. Noe ,€01 wn! AF NAL | THR ot yoRTH CAROLII | THE SUPERIOR COUR IREDELL COUNTY Coleen Johnson Veaner, 2 ninor by her Next Frend, Louie leaner, Plaintiff JUDG..ZNT Defendant i ause comin ye hee nd bei hear This cé oO g on to be heard and being heard by consent of Counsel for all parties at Chambers at Asheboro, North Carolina, before His Honor i \ ? frank Me Armstrong, Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District, atid was rict, ‘ heard by the consent of the parties without a jury; that the cause was he: upon statements of Counsel for both parties and t:e evidence submitted ines ee 3 eaa 4) sand ana 4 ee } n ; ; } : Court by e duly licensed physician, and it appearing to the vourt that the minor, Colleen Johnson \weaner, by her Next Friend and husband, Louie Weaner, institut d this action to recover damages whih she sustained because of injuries received when she was in a collision between a motorcycle owned and operated by Louie ieaner and a 1937 Plymouth automobile owned and operated by tue defendant, AeDe iarmon, which accident occurred on t.1e Statesville-Harmony Highway near .tose Chape. Church on the &th day of hay, 1949; end it appearing that the olaintiff and defendant have agreed upon a settlement of all matters and things growing out 0} the allered injuries set forth in the plaintiff's complaint, whereby the defendant n ‘ . . . . . ‘ f° eS 1 > vy of It nas agreed to pay the plaintiff tne sum oi $300.00 in full settlement of tne ninor's alleged injuries,together with the costs of this action. And the Court carefully examined the evidence in the case, particularly the evidence of the physician, under whose care the minor was treated, and it Was made to appear to the Court that the husband of the minor was entirely satisfied with the settlement, and the duly licensed physician, who treated her is of the opinion that the minor has made a full recovery trom the injuries Which she Sustained, and that the only disability minor suffers from is sore~ ‘ 4 } "e$s which will pass away with time, and that in his opinion, there _ be no lasting, permanent effect of the injuries which the minor sustained in tne After full injuiry in the matter, decree; m of $300 . 00 ue plaintiff, efendant the su s for t That the plaintiff recover of the d yard, Attorney behalf of the P , ‘oodhouse & That out of this sum woo jaintiff, the sum of $50.00 for legal services on oe eS which sum is found by the Sourt to be a reasonable charge for the Services rendere 3. That the defendant shall pay the costs of this action, 4. That the settlement between the parties, entered by consent, and approved by the Court, is not unreasonable or unjust to the minor plaintiff pyt is to her best interest. Signed and entered at Asheboro, North Carolina, this 16 day of December, Frank |., Armstrong OO Frank |., Armstrong, Judge Presiding Consent: Louie weaner, hext Friend of Colleen Johnson weaner. Louje V. \eaner _ soodhouse & Ward _ woodhouse & ard, Attorneys fIor the plaintiff. Re Battley “Attorney for ro i ¢ iefendant. No. 4716 NORTH CAROLINA, 9ERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNT Dr. T. V. Goode, III, Plaintiff, Vs. Great Southern Trucking Company, | Incorporated, and Frank Owen Abernat UW sayy Defendants. It appearing that all tne matters in difference between the parties hereto have been settled and compromised by tne payment to the ilaintiff of One Hundred Eleven Dollars am Ninety-two Cents (3111.92) in full settlement of the cause of action alleged in his Complaint» NOW, THEREFORE, BY CONSENT, IT 15 ORDERED, ADJUUGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff take nothing further of the Defendants by this action; that the action is dismissed; that the Defendants pay one-half of the costs t to taxed by the Clerk. This December 16, 1949. Ge Omith rk of the Superior vourt of UW erKk oO -edell County. ’ “@ “e Consent: Dr. T. V. Goode, III Plaintirr by Neil S. Sowers, Atty Land, Sowers & Avery _ Mttomeys for »laintiff = Adams, Dearman & \jinberry Attorneys for Defendants. aS ee a a re Se gs — = = Pia eee = Noe 4746 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR CuURT NUnit ag i IREDELL COUNTY Thurdy Lee Caupbell Plaintiff ast = JUDGAENT Ulaude A. Boyles Defendant coming on to be heard and being heard before the Honorable pearing to the the superior Court of Iredell County and it ap the statmmts of counsel that all matters of controversy set out in the Yourt from nave been asreed upon by the parties, andthat the defendant has agreed ice + aa —s 3 sf ha arr > accept tne sum 5 300,00 ay to the plaintiff and tne plaintiff has agreed to accept tne um of 9300.00 of this action in full accord and satis + ‘ Se e od an 1 q ¢ a | 4 hat senv, 1s ordered, ad, an e jiefendant the and the costs Nhe myuVoe ce C. Ge omitn x. G. olen, clerk of the Superior Court ,,oodnous tae LALNUILS e tne Defendant. nave ana recover NO. 4791 NOXTH CAROLINA } NOxXTH CAROLIN: In the Superior Court IRZDELL CUUN I } 7 } t COUNTY Before the Clerk, J- F. Duncan, T/A Heating and Plumbing vontractor, Vs. Ben liiller, and wife, Edna l.iller. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before Hon. C.G. Smith, Clerk of Superior Vourt of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon motion by the plaintiff for judgment arainst the defendants by default and inquiry; and it appearing to the court that the verified complaint was filed, and the Summons issued in this action on the 18th day of Novenber, 1949; , and it further appearing to the Court that said Summons, togetner witn a copy of said complaint, was served on the defendant dna j.iller on the eend day of November, 1949, and on the defendant November , and it further appearing to the Court that no answe » demurrer, or other pleadings have been filed by the defendants, and no extension file pleadings has been granted, and that the within whic! be filed has € xh ired: it is, therefore, ordered, ‘ainst the defendats jury may find to by the plaintiff indebtedness be exec la he next civil term of the Superior iredeil County, | n Varoli'a, before a jury to determine the fy is indebtedness. This the 29th yo Ge Smith ,LerKk ouperior yourt, lredell younty, North Carolina. State of North Carolina Department of Archives and History Raleigh CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY This is to certify that the microphotographs appearing on this reel are true and accurate reproductions of the records li 1 on the target (title) sheet preceding each volume or : . s microfilmed hereon; that the records were microf 1 on the date and at the reduce tion ratio indicated; and tha yn the date of microfilmin the records were in the custody target sheet(s). It is further cert target sheet(s) were micr Sections 8=45.1 = 8=—4° in order to insure archival quality and authentic reproduc 1 of records filmed, they were microfilmed in the manner prescribed,and with equipment and film approved, by the State Department of Archives and History. +> x a XK ( Signed) Camera Operator