The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1926-1927Microfilmed by North Carolina Bepartment of Archives and History Bivision of Archives and Manuscripts Raleigh, North Carolina IREDELL COUNTY CLERK SUP COURT | nV TiN as bY016) 4 34 SEG her YEARS 1925 1929 PAGES © fC FILMED 6 21 65 RED RATIO 16 1 — + Amn ne gud {ie Migtr der Vw Finn vA : } eee ‘ LUG Fee t 7) if? % Z 4 WZ | 4 i + + j { + | YL 79 Tlenme YK, f B LU, thw Ey. de pete Aa “alae ul 55 Vike a £1 y 94 oho tee, LE/. PT Sa 5518p ws Uy, 50 = <> Ne + ann pam eeeaeetterc scree fe i (SR Age: cg Ape é | | i is a ack pet 10 f. $i ie Ge ral B > YMG Vd Pred LT 2S ee /2F\ Gliaby J4F | 145) fH) 4 w7 er 307 | rae — a a ae ie eats oa SEPA Saides RSS BS BSR Oe SPN ek, SSI EE tay Re re x ee Seto a et F ; : Baty se See Sia ee Se el ae cries Pe Teed LE nn Qi 327,328 Sin 3295 2f a S50 fon 4. ISL / Glan Sf) 6, HILL LL Wb | Ras, GA Fler. | Mot ts ile. an bs , Wl. Sa Sink L%, Darter, Cb6t.a IS CEH, aa Bead Theos os | Tia. Wh | j ae ag ae fa 2 Wl Litigde lp /2\ S pine A /44\ LFE\ S82. bya He i. YaAI Mik el — AYO : 0p ASS JO} \Lecdersa, ances. gyi Goin Dong" og | BA. 30) af o/h Lhe. & |Sz/] We S7KkIIH 8 . ee = pearl eateenjaee tea i hed enfin sone a cece ati a Ree cr ae N > rN SS a, ee ‘nike, b'4 Tatitha 54 o 4 vs S . SS \ a ema Aaa ompe were = Re oe : 2 i la See A tetera, heme on teat, +--c eaneicsel ts at a te SS a ge i ' pnp ne pone appene i i i j i i ' cnn lcerneeneenepeie 4 i i j penetrates if i wg Chl {tim tre, Cee, 0 ITZS, Tl er: £ ppt — 534 ; ie Ze A UE ae lod deged yy Hhsteg, as V4 an ¢ lj A /Go4 E OIE. | dod My? ee SS, a hg / ile 5G “Za if i C¢4 St, fap back LAA Mg. Mbt, ZA L464, ate! Be eo i tbe ee 1 i r ‘ j ' } oF 3 i se i N j Ree jf | \ : A ; é : F ' i Fe ; . ne i + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + - - + + + + + oe dpeevenenomend pancreas be mes . i | ; ' | i i i ' ; | ; + + + + . - + > + + + + + + + + + + + + - +. . a — : i T ' } i i | ' ; ' | ; j ee , ' t i 4 | : q ' 4 ; ; i i i i i ' « ' i ' i ; i | i 3 ' i 3 i i | j i ' i ; mt + ate be + * +: he os ‘ + oe . beni be i peels — eee + = + + + + : + + + + = + += + = = a Sa = si og 2 4 3 } } 4 4 4 + i + 4 ag * - > > ~— - see 6 T T : i } i i | j j eS i i 3 i i ; i a | = j z i | | i | | j j i i i i i i ; | i i i i } } i i i ; | i i | } | i ; i } od ; | | : | ' i i j j } i ' i j i i i Poa + + + + + + + + + - + + + + $a + +--+ + + + | i ' | age * Ste Be : . er eee ' a i | | | ' i | i ; ' >. ; i | "a i ; | j i = i i | i = > ~>— + - . - —~ + —— 4 ; _— | i i } —f—j~—j jj jf tt ie ae Lincs Ice Reed T | ’ ? ’ 7 ~ j ’ Pe i | j | i ; i + tp -+ + + 4 4 ce i i Bt od ok ce j i | j i ‘ snapiinafiiieaipemeeateilbemtictnaniile lidicwei send soithplianbes be + i i i : + + + ; { ; ' ee Poe | i | | j j i | { j i i | 4 j | j j j i } ; i oa | j | j | j i i } | j i i i ; j = 3 = i ==} + pt + oe : 3 font 2 + ¢ : # fot : ¢ : : + +——+ $ $ $ a _ . i i i j i + + 4 + + . + - + ; + womenaeiciniiy } i ; j j i j j j i i i i i i 4 4 + t a + + 4 + & k fide: 4d i at i ate ah a Ng nner gs SS sential pp penn nenlfereeennlseneenenseee cnnsilensitertennentlntanansy a sie saa \ pie eae? i aaa | | + + + \ i ip i q + + +t + + 7 ae + | | ba t | | i i) | | ti + t | | ih tee | | 2 + — i hia tai aera Ios nonrsannenend _ sm pin ane = — ~ een nett nt rman tet hin spiashoniececnici TRE si Z soled Ma a ess Me = = ~ rennin o- nf epee + Oy, / 4 oo a 2 r ze “Cxa| 4 Warne. YE, raemngpolatiniasire he i i nceeneesinnenpilansienetisiniidasiinie | | ana | Lille Hiatt tila tty , ASL, : ws 27 I 27, LUE | I Inerchiiuds ae. Za, | pe SONG 3. | ' (t ZZ 4 arr 5.26 : SSO 56-27 7\ ai I, Wome es bz Jap bo. a 4 ro a eRe ee os oe \ZA-T6 q eee ae } } | | j nn } j _—" aries hectnnantnntsdl nett + | ~~ z | i — fee neem t ' ' : — ; ' * => pe t : ' | " ‘ ? ' i i ' i : ‘ 3 i i ; i ; ; a : ; — + > > + . * > « . * + - - = + i i + + + + t - > + + + + + + - + + ole lien 4 ; 7. * ; * ——e > . >. > . > * > . > . + x + - + + + > + . - + + ~ + * . + + + + > ~~ . + ‘ i ; i ; ! ; , a j ' oe ; ’ = | i » | i ; i j : | 4 < Pag ; | i | i j j i ‘ i ; { ; ( ; i ; i i + + £ = + > +. + .s s. -= + + z = = + ; $ $ + $ $ ¢ $ + + $ + + + + + + =F a f= i ; ' i i $ } 4 } j i i > + + + + + - + + +—— —+—— + 4. ad i i | i i j } i ; | i i i i i 5 | i i i i ; ; ; i i i i ' | i : j j i i i i | i } : i ee } i ' + + + + > - + + + ++. - Me + : i i ' i | i | j ' | * Perot sis . j | j I i Poo ‘ i 5 7 — a — j } + | } | T + j T + + t + + nestle ee oe ~saeffoe on ertetenmnl nsereeereneti i i d | | | i i | — — —_—j—— 2 + +. — + + > + + + + — = + + = $ + + $ : $ $ $ $ $ + + $ 3 $ ; + + , > > > + $ + : : + 3 + : pang : : +: $ + + - + [== ——=— =a | Se ——+ + - + + + + > + y | i | { - + - - . a + +> — 4 i i i f } i i i i ; ' ier } + } + - + + + * a ‘ : ; — assem nna rssicon insite rere eseenpsenilil Mittin ne chert at pone On Behan. mene Dare aky off. hy Ft: 7, Lyne, lp /9 Mglente bbb ssf 24, ae os | BUY AL 2 2u4 Loerenale, Mh 0 Ch. 445, ‘7 i ; tA XL Ys) | ies 23. ZY S= Ape, 243} Meal}, ae 491 fe pape : aA ck | Pucrcack, i _— 4. / Lob, | le et tea Lema IY Va P13 24 sak i ie eee retattnny V4 j i j j : 2... fia 5 n OLHEt Lé- IF tt) ¥55 MISA Jib VIC CAL ells ™~ oe Pe = =o a 2 Ssteess p neeneternselneenceeeneeieneeenndpenee iene ; f ' , of ' { | ' ' * i i : i ; plete | | selina + ms + cininsaidialh + + | | + + + + } 4 ; | | | j j : i ; i ' } i i i | : j dnseinecennemcelheseencsenai + +. pened 4 4 + + + | | | 4 4. + > > - - | F es Riviicasinjedhiacisim " 4 j 4 i i i i ; i i ' } i | ’ i os i i : } | j i i j 3 ; . ; ; i ; | ' i | ] i j ' i ; i j i a = = = — SS} = = = + = + + = = 7 $ + = + = = = + + + + , | + + + + = = ———[S—[S=== —_ ‘ fpaastieinnteell + } + + + | | | + + 4 4 4 } | | 4 + + + | | + + > > + on pe a i j | | i i | { j i i } i 4 i ; ; | ; } | Pt j | i | ; | i i } i i os a 4 + + i. 4. 4 | | - - > . . - - - e+ +e. i pd j i j { ; i | ; i i , i j i i i i } | ++ nlite D eeniiensigl sch 4 4 ; . a ‘ + + + + + | > >. + font | j : j | | | ss wtelice tee j i . 7 i | ' firnennesei pee nh nh | | | | j - - . - i rT HL. 4+ i | | j i j j a = — — == = a ee = = = = = + ~ - $+ : + iu i = $ t + =; = $ : : : + + = : : + + + ? j=aes —————S=———— — — ———-}- 4 + + + | + + 4 + ; 4 4 + | ‘ 4 4. nil : i ; $ ‘ + 4 A + | i | ; : ' i : i —}+— teasers J — 4 | eI \2ZI \2ZI So] (a 123 baa’ 4.13. /G0\123\ Sb) Shin dag paper + ¢ OL, HU GMA, fips Shin Md a, LW’E. tL7 oa ctr esinns fot eos ccs aap ital iene icin é ie bd i } fiicttilidhcccichee | ; tn = i ke sellin Maia ES ns Bd i | i HH +H G12 12 W244. Men __ ON WU, GLEE He) LL Hpaledinil le Seah tet Ke“ pe Hedi | S26) LPL, SSIS Lia Ao | lid Yuce| (#1 es 76h KE LIL L422 | ; | { ee | qf Lf eh 24 s ip é ALE L, 2 of.3| 7 C191 ANN; (3. d_2 Yo Lp Ai la, _ PPG Det C 22 == = Sa PLA THF OI P57 +07 7 | IEC, 2 | i | ; ' a ‘ 2 i i lit ncn scl cialis 4 ‘ 4 4 lp 4 4 4 ; 4 4 4 ; ‘ 4 4 4 ; 4 + 4 4 tap ipincdiinaind _ > ; + ; : | | ; } j i erp amen > _ > + > + > > > > . + . > + > - . + - . -~ . > - ~ - — + ; ; j j i ; ; ; i ; j ; ; j ; i i i i PS ; ' ; ! i j ; j | i i i i ' | i i j i i ; j i | i i ; ; i i j i i ; - = sate +: + : + + + + : + + + . + = + + + : 3 + + + 2 + + So = + = + + + + : + + + + + + + $ + + $ + $ + + + + + a SSS =F | ‘ i | | SS ica j i i MY ! i i eee eee app + 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ‘ 4 4 + + + + + + + + > + een + . i . j } ; i } ' i i ; i j i ~ j ~ | i i i j \ i i ; j i ' | ; ; } i ' ; i i | j j j } ; i j | j ‘ j ; ; ; ; ¢ : | i ; | ' ; } i j ; i ‘ i ; ' \ aa i | ne + ~ + + - + ~ + > * + + ° + + + . + + + - + + + - + + + ~- +— ~~ —---4 et cnet oF — j i | | ' oe Pie i ; i ' | ' ; } mee r | | j i | | i | i i i i | refine i ad + apn + + + + i + i i 4 + te + + + ; i { | | | f i ' ; } ; j | | i ' | i ' j ; i i j } i j en ee | | ay i | >— oH HH { i 4. 4 i ; } j i ' i ' ' i j j ; } | ; : i i i ' Sa tS a + = + + + + + $ + + + + = = $ + = =+ + + SS + === = + SSS SSS SE SSS eset > > > + - * + + + + + T T x T , , , ? ? + t > —— | : ; ; i ‘ + + 4 + + + + ’ + f ay Bs 4 3 i = i j | Faas j j pS 2 } ae ee nen he + pnccconinnindl + + + + + + + + + + 4 * + + + + + + + ‘ + pr enn fn fend —+ ' ' i ' } i i : enn —+ + + + nd ~+ 4 + + + + + + + +. elas + + + + + + + + + sais whiecmninaily aiid $n neces + . i ' i < ; ! ; j Pa Aa : | } i é ' ; i j i ; ; ' i f } j ' ’ t | i j py i i ; i | 4 { ' j | j | i } j | j i i ee BS ' i 3 j ; ; j i ' | ' i ' : t } % ; j 4 i | ———S = + = + + + + + = + + + + + + $ + + + + + + + + + + + + SS SSS i i + - * 4 + . + + + + + + . + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + ~ . + + + + 4 + . i | j ! i ; i | j ; j j } | ' j } j j ; i ; j ; t j ‘ i i i i he as pe i i ' i i i i ; | j i ; i | i i j j i i | } | } i j i i 4 ! i j | j i i ; | ' . to ‘ | = | Po aed ; : i { ' = i i j i i { | i i | i i | | | i 1 i fo eee j i | i | i | i | a ae j j ; j i ; } ' 4 i i iihieMiriic Mt ete. SP 3 4 j i ; i | | oe + + tt Sa +> + + + + + + + + + . + + * + + + + + + - + + + * + --- ~~ ~-4— he —>—— + { | | | ; i + | j i e | } i i ; ' ———+ ~+ + > + + + + * + - + + + + - * + + + + + i i ; + ; + + } ; + + 4 + } + + + i nf eh ' ; | } j i j } j j iieeeiitetie ct as i j j } ilialheeieamiall am ‘ he p : fed = 2 ‘ : = + + + + apres SSS = + + + = + SS + + fo SSS + : : $ : $ + + $ + $ = + + + ——p$——--¢--—- ; ; f j j 4 ; ; + ‘ + + 4 + + + rani _ - ~ > > . - > . + - . + + + , ’ | i ; j ; j j i i ; } i ' i a ; i i i j + fpnemnnd a r ; % } a See see SSS a i 4G, 2 aa, wz, 7 = LF | A, Gs NWN’ Yd 40 ; Wnt/n, Sil | a Led wg . - / le Wise? £E Ogg ped fung 01 Vt, gD che C4 ! WW Af, we = eh } 4 Ge MEG is : Ws, Sarde. Mag A KF Lill plea Spe lf LLNWUEA We S a , + Tpit ilfenann~ Co AYAM TA Line oy Ga | LAL LA, VO). SSH Fao | a eleenc i ai LAG é, Metin, Ea 436 ZB IN. WE-SH 990. L | ae. Ae Mi IIL oo LIZ DS f Cf 3 OI7 + + ; i i | | i } | i # oe ; paren + + }. + + + 4 + + + + + + + > + * . ; i 4 ; ; 4 Dime 4 ff ' ' ’ _ —_— + + + + + 4 + + 4 | | ms > > + . + > * - + > | + Diced ig Rae a e bce aire” tt + + ; i i | = i i } i | = j ' ; j | i : ® ' } | | ; i | i i e | | es | 2 ; % j ‘ i ' ; i i j j i i i i i i i i ; ‘ ' : + + + + :s - : 4 z + + + + +. + sz + = : pee SS i i pee | > - | i + + + whe Sviionsili hei i j | 7 | ; i i | | i i j ' | i i | 4 i | i j i j | i i ; : j | i | i j i i i i i eg ; ee j j | fo Bee i - i i i | j i | Looe i i | tp tH j i | Deseo Tee i i j | t j | | | . ee ee HH HH = | am i i - + + + 4 4 4 | | ' 1 ; ies : ° ' j i / t t + tt + 4 j | i sd i j rT Tt + + + eet 5 i | | | | zs PE > HH + + 2477) | i | j } | | —<+ $ + fa | + 4 | | | | | ? ? > * + | : | i | + t | + | icici fnionsesinipinssaeil : | i ; ' i j i ; j | i j ; em + + a3 + + = + + + + + + + = + $ + $ + = + $ = SS = ; + + = + = a a a Eee $ = = + $ + = : + + = + $ + SSS + + + + $ + + $ + == = : + + = == + = + ae — ~+ +}. + + + 4 ~~ j i { ; j i j i j i i i + + + + - a ithe 2 he es aie Sea f re 4 = CiipeniAciti ie ccicad j Rk J hes j i } i ; j i 4 j i j } | j j 5 | poo 4 i i ected reciiednapasa hice eis 4 i i A ee — +. ~ —- > . ~* -~ . - -~ . +> - . - . - - - - > . - - ~ + - > - « * - -~ 2 - - > rn + i i 2 i | x ; ' ; | 3 : os . ; j ? ! : } ; i | ; | i ; ' : i | | ; i | i j | | ; { i | 4 : i i 5 : ‘ il . i eS Sp rs : $ : : : : $ py : 3 os + a N : ; i t+ - . > > . . > - - - > - - - - - . . +. + - . > - > - - --- - + > . : W ! i Wy ; i \_ + = “~ i i \ ; \ I NY } | | i a | iN a - . * . > > - - . - - +. . - - . - - - * * - + } i | | j j i j j j i bined j ' i | | i ; | ; | | | ; 4 4 as i i j i ; j i ' ; j i | j i j i Biss: ee een + i i ' ' | | | | ] - + +— + 4 Disaiacel 4 i j i fine | al i Pineda oe i | —_ > oe + coenepemetins { + + + pe 4 i i j ji j ' Le : ; i — — — — = ———2- 2 : = + + + = + + | [SS Fs + + $ ¢ $ : $ a 3 $ : : ¢ $ + : : $ + : r 4 : : + : : : i + + + + == = ——= —S—S—S= a = 2 Sas Ss = | | j j i i j j j { pccridithcekicntt he so eae j i j j ; 7 i i | ae ee ccna eee os ' North Garolina, ' In the Superior Gourt, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. — = John W. Spoolman § vs § JUD@OMENT, Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co,§ This cause coming on to be heard before the Court and it appearing to the Court, from the admission of the parties to this action, that the plain- = tiff and defendant compromised and settled all Claims and demands on the part ee eee eRe eR ron Ap of the plaintiff against the defendant growing out of the alleged cause of action set out in the plaintiff's complaint and that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the amount agreed upon; and the Plaintiff having come into court by and through his attorney of record, Buren Jurney, and requested per- mission to take a voluntary non-suit;: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that this action be dismissed and judgment of non-suit entered. It is further ordered that the defendant pay SE a ; the costs of this action, in the amount o f $8.00 Ss This the 7th day of December, 1925, 1 Je A. Hartness erk Superior Court. By Consent: Buren Jurney Attorney for plaintirr John A Scott Attorney for defendant, QLVDXALIIH QW AAPA IAD OI YVOAVIOAXA YADA North Oardlaina, 4 In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk. Nachman Spring-Filled Co. 4 vs \§ JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT. Iredell Upholstered Furm. Co. 4 THis cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, and it ‘Ppearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have settled _ ditterences in full and that the defendant. hes paid to the “7 ¥ amount due it ; a % 7 It is threupon, by consent of the plaintiff, ordered, considered 4 and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed and judge) ment of non-suit entered, And it further appearing that the defendant has paid the costs, it is ordéred and adjudged that it go hence without day. December 7, 1925. J. A. Martness Clerk Superior Gpurt. By Consent: Grier and Grier Attorneys for plaintiff John A. Scott es Attorney for defendant, VAIDYA: .QYCO@ODGAAUD GUKDUGAVOIAQDAYD® North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, Q Iredell Counby. 4§ Before the Clerk, Tredell Upholstered Furniture Co. vs JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUIRY. MP Critcher, andIndividual Doing Business under the name and Style of the Crither Hotel, Boone, N.C, This eause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the record in this case, that summons was personally served upon the defende antoén the lst day of October, 1925, and a verified copy of the complaint served therewith on said date; and it appearing fubther to the Court that this is an action brought by the Plaintiff to recover of the dafiendantvthe haccount for f00ds sold and delivered by the tiff to the defendant, which sum of $557.00 upon spen plain- Sum bears interest from Aug, 9th, 1925, until paid at six per cent and it appearing further to the twenty days determination of the jury; It is therefore, ghtitiea to recover of the ordred and decreeq that the plaintiff is defendant in thig action and that the plaintifr _ toa have judgment by default and inquiry against the defendant, and it appear- ing that the account upon which this suit is brought is an open account, It is further orddpred that an issue be submitted to the jury to de- termine the amount of said recovery, It is further ordered that the defandant pay the costs of this action. This the 50th day of November, 1925, J. A. Hartness Superior Court Iredell County. O2QQ BOQ DAVARI YYOAY@ North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk, L. D. Cook vs J U D G M Wi N TT. B. R. Towell This cause coming on to be heard before Shea. Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court and being heard and it appearing that summons was issued in the abive case on November 18, 1925 and verified complaint was filed on November 18, 1925, it further appearing that the suit is brought on a promissory notes and it further appearing that no answer has been filed, the summons having been served’on the day of November, 1925, It is therefore ordeped and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $500.00 with interest from December 27y 1924 at the rate of six per cent per annum and the cost of this action. This Monday December 14, 1925, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superipr Court . QCA GARY HA AK CVVA Y GIB ae a Mees - Nee oi ie ucts Co. Account 1.56 nt ae gs ge Comp. settlement Acct. 32.50 ’ Da J. A. Davidson Note 46.70 i W. R. Mills Bight Autos 779.85 Iredell County. 4 i - 3. Patterson Comp. Settlement Acct. 125.00 John Young Note 400.00 F. 8. Morrison Sale of Insolvent accounts copy of which ’ is hereto attached 6.00 North Carolina, eon i ei P, P, Dulin, Receiver of The Royal Motor Company, hereby makes thiy 4G his final account of said estate showing all receipts and disbursements as follon,; Total Receipts, $4,212.50 RECEIPTS. DISBUREMENTS. R. L. Reavis Machinery and supplfes e90+00 oe 50 J. P, Flanningan File case 4.00 Stamps, tags and twine =a Kyles Torch —— aby 4136 Carolina Motor Co. mae pin i o. Marsh for selling a@ding Machine 10.00 se “— 1.85 Statesville Battery Co. 3 Mos. Rent 208.68 zeae Deteenee " *30 Scott Charnley & Co. Auditing 250.00 Johm M. eretin Q a 8.45 C, Watkins, account as Temporary Rec. 38.00 Soptia Sk Gace Suprdilies 9.85 Fox Millsaps Motos th Repair work oo R. L. Reavis 10.30 dee tte dete eee Co. Ins & Bond 159.07 Morrison Lumber Co, Account 8.75 Serta Brae. Seta o. Ins on oe tt an . e e ~ oe " an woatipeda & Thompson Atty fee 215.00 i: i, Rene Suppiles 16.80 Iredell County Tax. $4.10 Bailey ae 3.90 City o@f Statesville idl i= ace : Thompson ” 1.90 J. A. Hartness, C.S.C. ™ -60 - P, Henkel Account 5.50 Carolina Motor Co. Supviles 29.30 John Young ' °75 J. R. Starrett ee 15.00 an ES aL Dividend of 15.5% to be paid as follows: Air Reduction Sale Co, 84 N. D. Starrett af 13.00 D. L. Warren C. D. Bailey J. M. Arey Carolina Motor Co, Central Cafe J. A. Eidson C. D. Bailey Holland Bros, Cemtral Cafe C. D. Bailey Re - Anderson H. Tomlinson L. Tompson W. Hager W. R. Mills Central Cafe Cash Sale Auction Sale R. M. Anderson W. Re. Mills L. A. Thompson Cash Sale B. L. Jones B. L. Phifer John M McElwee Ross Mills Auction Sale " " Note Supviles Hickory, N.C, Carolina Motor GO, Supplies Casing Fann Pulley Account Brush Payment off Automobite Motor Starter Pubelies Spring Anvil Starr Phonograph Supplies Payment on Automobile tia wt Supplies estate account Show case Desk Bumper and lights Leonard Piano Store Account R. M. Anderson Sale of Supplies R. M. Anderson F. C. Hubbard W. M. Lundy Paymeng on Auto Payment on Auto Account Bal. on Subscription Iredell Ice & Fuel Co. Account J. P. Flanningan R. Reavis L. Caldwell J. Flanningan R. Anderson A. Crouch Cash Sale W. W. Holland J. L. Holland n * " Gas and 011 tanks Machinery Shafting Clock Payment Supplies on Auto,4 Burning in Stana Account 2.00 7.20 44.22 20.00 50.00 12.50 3.00 1.53 66.65 25 00 225 101.00 145.00 1.95 5.00 6.00 25.00 86.00 304.70 50.00 200.00 5255 American Arts Works American Mills Co, Brunswick Balk Calder Co, Bassick Alémite Co. W. M. Barringer T. N. Brown Chamber of Commerce City of Statesville, Light acct. Doll & Smith Elyea Co. C. H. Turner Goodyéar T. & R. Co. R. M. Heblingshead Co. Interstate Motor Equipment Interstate Motor Co, Iredell Telephone Co, Komo Supply Co, Eugene Morrison Sr, W. Re Mills sr. PF. 8. Morrison Newton Ice and Fuel Co. Piedmont Hardware Co, Pyramid Ignition Postal Tel, Co. Mills Electric Co, Reflex Ignition Co. Red Devil 041 Co. Simons Manufacturing Co. Standard 011 Co. 0. W. Slain Glass Co, Statesville Oil Co. Statesville Motor Co Statesville Printing Co. Thomas Hardware Co, WU, Telegraph Co, Carolina Auto Supply House rk e Gulf Refining Co, seer less Mfg. Corporation, outhern Chemical Products Co. 10.12 70 9.64 a7 10 36 1.93 40.95 19.34 9.350 076 105.59 13.31 4.68 95 5.00 13.31 17.53 60.06 9.66 8.25 9.02 1.47 Garritt Electric Co. see Burroughs Adding Machine Co. In full ae Eugene Morrison Jr. can Shuford National Bank scares Commercial National Bank : Total $3818.55 $4212.90. ies —en "3703.55 ee Total , $4,214.36 Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 2lst day of April,1925 PP. Fe: Doe Receiver. C. G. Smith Deputy Clerk Superior Court North Carolina, } 4 Iredell County. } In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, Snow Lumber Company vs a JUDGMEND®, W. B. York and F W York, partners trading and doing business under the firm name and style of WB York and Son, ~~ This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action for breach of an express contract tp pay abso- lutely the sum of $1490.00 tue by stated account and balance struck for lumber sold and delivered defendants, and that under the terms of sale said gum of $1490.00 became due and payable on the 7th day of May, 1925; and it Swpiher together with copy of the complaint was personally named defendants, appearing that the summons served on each of the above and that said complaint duly verified was filed in this office on the date of issuing said summons, toew!t ’ on Nowember 350th 1925; and it further appearing that more than twenty days has elapsed and expired since the service of said Summons and copy complaint on each of the defendants, and that the defendants and each of them have fail- ed to answer said complaint within the t ime allowed by law; A t is therefore, considred, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of ONE THOUSAND FoUR HUNDRED and. NINTY ($1,490.00) DOLLABS, with interest thereon from May 7th, 1925, at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk og this Court, This December 21, 1925, ‘ J. A. Hartness Clerk Superfor Court Iredell County. PB ost ese tese tt sete tect eee pce TOE ete ete tt ee ees Fr beet eet North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredel] County. § Before the Clerk, J. K. Morrison Grocery and Produce Co. Inc. vs JUDGMENT, W. A. Howard This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Superior Coubt and it appearing the difference has been settled by the parties it is hereby ordered that the same be dismissed and plaintiff be taxed with the cost, which has been paid. This Jan. 4, 1926. J. A. Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court, Wiebe bette testi te eieest esheets North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, } Iredell County. 4( Before the Clerk. Cherry-Bassett-Winner Co. v8 CONSENT JUDGMENT. W. E. Selby, trading under the name@ and Style of Selby Ice ¢ Cream Co, This cause comibg on to be heard, and it appearing to the Court that all matters in controversy in this action and all accounts and claims of.everey nature existing between the plaintiff and defendant have been com- Promised and adjudged between the parties by the payment to the plaintiff >y. the defendant of the sum of one Hundred and Fifty-eight Dollars, ($158.00) which payment is hereby acknowledged by the plaintiff, by And it is therefore, ordered and adjudged by consent, that the 3 tiff take nothing more by this action and that the defendant go without day, It is further ordered and adjudged, by consent, that the plaintige pay the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This the 3lst day of December, 1925, J. A. Hartness Clerk Suoerior Court, By Consent: John A. Scott Attorney for Plaintié@f. EB. Mi. Land epee Attorney for Defendant. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk, Mrs. D J Williams, vs JUDGMENT, R CG Querry, J M Querry, J P Hendren and S G Sloan. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the defendants in this action were properly bgBought be- fore the Court by ebing served with Summons, by reading and leaving a copy of said summons with said defendants and each of them and by leaving a veri- — fied copy of the complaint with each of said defendants; And it further appearing to the Court that said summons was is- sued on the 25th day of June 1925 and returnable on the llth of July 1925; And it further appearing to the Court that more than twenty days have elapsed since said return date and that the derendants have not filed an answer to the complaint, nor demurred thereto; indebted to the plaintirr in the sum of three hundred dollars ($300.00) and interest threon at 6% form the 25rd day of July 192 5 until paid, to be com- puted payable every four months in advance rr 46 of the defendants the Sum of three hundred and thirty- sixty-four cents ($337.64) ana interest from this the furkhax cost in this action, This This the seven dohlars and date untsl1 paid and for : being the first Monday in August. Srd day of August 1925, ——i 4 Hertnese Sete ten a North Carobina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk, Harmony Banking and Trust Co. vs JUDGMENT, R A Jones, and Lula Jones, F B Gaither and O G Sills, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the defendants in this action and each of them were duly summons and brought into Court byv reading of the summons and the delivertng of a copy of the same to the said defendants and each of them, and by the delivering to each of said defendants a verified copy of the complaint; It further appearing to the Court that more than twenty davs have elapsed since the retubn day and that the defendants have failed to file an answer to the complaint or a demurrer threto; And it further appearing to the Court from the complaint filed in this action that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2129.00 with interest thereon from the 12th day of October 1925 until paid; And it further appearing to the Court from a supplmental complaint filed in this cause that the defendants R A Jones and wife lula Jones paid to the plaintiff on said indebtedness on the Srd day of November 1925, the wun of $1017.55; And it appearing further to the VYourt that after this payment the amount due the plaintiffs $1119.02 with interest thereon from the 3rd of November 1925 until paid, It is therefore ordered, decreed and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff recover ofthe defendants the sum of $1119.02 with interest thereon from the 3rd day ofNovember 1925 until paid and for the cost of this action. This being the third Monday, In Nov. This the 16th day ofNovember 1925 J A Hartness C S C, H H Yount, trading and doing business as Yount Motor Company JUDGMENT a Hugh Carson, James ¥ Tharpe an Edna Love Caldwell administratrix of L C Caldwell deceased ) ) vs ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, the 25th day ofJanuary 1926, and it appearing to the Court that this isan action on a note, the amount due thereon being a certain stated amount, and that the defendants have been properly served by personal service of summons, and that the defendants, James By Tharpe and Hugh Carson are principalson saidnote,and same was endorsed by L C Caldwell as a surety, and that this fact is set forth in the answer of the administratrix of the said LC Caldwell, deceased, and that the other two defendants, James RB. Tharve and Hurh Jarson, have not filed a demur or answer within the time allowed by law: It is therefore, ordered and adjugged by the Court that the plaintiff recover judgment for the sum of $550.00 together with interest thereon from the 15th day of July 1922 until Paid, at the rate of six per cent per annum'with costs of this action against the defendants, James E. Tharpe and Hugh Carson, as vrincipals, and against Edna Love Caldwell, administratrix of LC Caldwell, deceased, and the estate of y ties ; L C Caldwell asendorser or surety on saidnote,, It is further ad judged that the Property of the principals be exhausted befere issuing execu- tion against the estate of LC Caldwell, This January 25th, 1926 —/A Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court of Tredellcounty. Wee th tase tese tees spas ap ceee oe nag Sheth sabe ‘IN THE SUPERIOR COURT °« JANUARY TERM MONDAY JANUARY 25, 1926, A.D. NORTH CAR GLINA: In the superior Court IREDELL COUNTY: January Term 1926 Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the 5th Monday béfore the lst Monday in March, 1926, the same being the &xhe 25th dav of January, 1926, A. D. when and where His Honor, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, xs BRRARRK and peaxkdingy; he and holding Courts for the 15th Judicial District, Spring Term 1926, is present and presiding, and Hon. Zeb vy Long,Solicitor is present and prose- cuting in ‘the name of the state, M P Alexander the High Sheriff of Iredell Countv is present and returned into open court the names of the following good and lawful man to serve as jurors for the first week of this term of the Superior Court, to-wit: The following were drawn and sworn in as Grand-Jyrors for the term: Edgar N Linkery-J E Harris, R L Poston, ! C Yates, N Spurgeon Gaither, WJ Oliphant, JA Fulp, George W Dotson, Roy Stimpson, G L Houston, WH Renngary BC Howard, A M Cooper, P J Koberts, Geo, Géllippie, J L Woodg, DH Ostwalt; and J % Fox. R L Poston was appointed andsworn asforeman of the Grand-Jury, O B Lazenby wasapnointed as officer of the Grand Jury. WR Rose, R E Massey, Glen Elliotte, John H Rankin. and T H Summers were returned: "Not to be found in Iredell County, N Cc" S F Renegar, WC Grose, Garland Monday, and R C Redman were excused Yor law satisfactory causes. The following were drawn and sworn as petty jurors for the weeks ? C Cavin, C P Johnson, Harry Carrigen, Frank Bryant, R B Holmes, B 8 Templeton, R A Marshall, ¢ R Montgomery, and WC Perry 3p; yo 2 TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOUR tate fhe Defendant, Boss Reid appeared and showed vs ood behaviour Robert Williams % Continued under former order. *« Boss Reia The Defendant, Robert Williams, ALIAS CAPIAS No 106 TO APPEAR AND &HO'Y GOOD BEHAVIOUR t | | 4 Defendant called and failed. Nisi Sci Fa & Capias, — 4 ; i * TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR. Continued under former order. No 125 State Vs Dewey L Foil No 134 Statex Vs Buck Faulkner No 148 State VS Willie Bell No 157 State VS Doy Shoemaker No 160 “tate vs Sam Holmes No 166 State yo John Yall No 172 State Vs Espy Young & Dave Byers No 173 State yo GR Towell No 164 State Vs Harvey Campbell IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926 EMBEZZLEMENT Defendant pleads guilty of willfully Misappropriation of funds. Upon the recommendation of the So#icitor prayer for Judgment continued upon payment of the costs, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Defendant called and failed. Jufigment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. LARCHNCY Alias Capias. TRANSPORTING AND POSSESS ING LIQUOR Continued for defendant. ASSAULT WITH DH#ADLY WEAPON Continued by consent FALSE PRETENSE Nol Prossed with leave. HOUSE BREADKING AND LAKCHNCY Continued for defendants, GIVING WORTHLESSCHECKS Nol Prossed with leave. FORGERY Defendant waive Trespass, 8 bill and pleads guilty of forcible It is ordered and adjudged b d y the Co: e ndant be imprisioned ‘ pon Bs of Iredell NTHS and assigr of said county for said — t the defendant pay the present term of court. sum of $200.00 to appear Years. At next criminal “8 paid father or the her show each term that order tocontinue at least 4 applying himself toésome hon © feilure to compl) #,0P any one of them, it shall « oO ” ooneuaes e to issue capias, and take up hi January, No 167 “tate vs Clay Brown No 167% State Va Clay Brown No 168 State Vs Mack Rash No 1684 “tate Vs Mack Rash No 176 & 175 “tate Vs Vance Huffman & “ate Suffman ) } ‘ | d § 4 IN THE SUPBRIOR couRT JANUARY TERM 1926 MONDAY JANUARY 25 1926, A p STORE BREAKING AND LARCENCY Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY of store breaking and Larcency, but pleads guilty of Trespassing. It is ordered and adjuged by the Detirtdth.at the Defendant be imprisioned in the common Jail of Iredell County, for a period of SIXx MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of saidcounty for said period, FORCIBLE TRESSPASS Defendant pleads guilty of Forcible Trespass. It is ordered he Cot that the defend- 1 of Iredell County for AND assigned to work on public © take effect after sentence in 167 if he is not of @o00d behavior, oO JY STORE BREAKING AND LARC&NCY Defendant pleads not guilty of store breaking and Larcency, but pleads guilty of Teaspassing,. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Defendant be imprisioned in the common jail of Iredell County, for a period of SIX MONTHS? and assigned to work on the Public Roads of Iredell County for said period, FPORCEBLESSRESPASS Defendant pleads builty offforcible Teaspass It is ordered and adjudged by the Court shat the defend- ant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWO YEARS and assighed to work on public roads. This sentence to take effact after sentence in 168 if he is not of Rood behavior, FORGERY Defendants gome into open Court and plead guilty of FORGER¥eas*ehafged in the Bill of Indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that Prayer forJudgment be continued on payment of the costs of this action, Provided it is padd into the Clerk's office on or before January Term, 1928. Defendants to appear at the January Term, 1927 and show that they have paid the cost. This Honorable Court takes 4 recess until Tuesday Morning 26, 1926, at 9:00 O'clock A M heh * JANUARY TBRM EK 1926 TUESDAY JANUARY 26 192 adjournment, at This Honorable Court Convened according to ad. ; 9:00 A.M. Tuesday, January 26, 1926, for the dispatch of business, In the Superior Court North Carolina January Term 1926 Iredell County Hon T D Bryson Judge Presiding: We, the Grand Jury for the January Term of Iredell County Superior Court 1926, beg leave to submit the following report: We have acted upon all billssent before us by the Solicétor and have made due returns of same to the Court. The County Jail was visited and there was found to be 9 cdlored men prisiners, 4 white menprisoners, making 15 prisoners awaiting trial. Also 1 sick negro girl prisoner serving sentence and 1 white man Federal Prisoner, serving sentence, These prisoners report they are well fed ana cared for. We wish to commend the Jailor for the clean and sanitary con- dition of the building. We recommend that the top rail on the banisters be replaced on the second floor. We recommend that some immeciate provision be made for adequately caring for the insane of Iredell County, other than the present accommodation and equipment, Ve also visited the County Home for aged and infirm and found therein 41 inmates, 17 white females, 11 white males, 5 colored females arid 8 colored males, and of this number, wefound 1 blind female, We dite find 5 prisoners, 1 woman and 4 men, The inmates of the home report that they have plenty of food, good nourishing food, properly prepared and served, and that they also have Plenty of clothing and bedding, We also find that the premises are in a clean and sanitary condition . ’ e The keeper of the home revorts that they haveenough corn, wheat and vegetables to supplythem until another crop is made We visited the County chain gang in a committeeand found the camp in a very satisfactory condition regarding care and keep of the prisoners Also, found it in a sanitary condition. We found 9 white convicts, and 6 ’ colored andthrough inquiry of these més, find they are well cared for in regard to treatment, food and Clothing, We also found the equipment to contain 1 motor truck, Gwagons, 12 mies The miles show to be well fed and cared for. The wagons showed to have been Considerably worn found the grading tools to be in a Satisfactory condition ‘ We visited the Court House, by committee » and its several offices and we find that the business of the county igs b adly hampered for lack We findthat the vaults in the offices of the Court and Register of Deads of space in the offices, Glerk of the 6 @ h » are insufficient to take : care of and protect fr i f-Z t | rom fire, the Present important Precores of Irede] Cor We also A IN THE SUPERIOR. COURT JANUARY TERM 1926, Tuesday Jan 26, We also find that the offices of the Sheriff, Treasurer and Superin- tendant of Schools are insufficient in size, to handle the present volume of business. Considering thesehandicaps, we find the business of the County is being handled in a very efficient manner. We therefore recommend that the County Commissioners provide adequate fire-proof vaults to rpotect the valuable records of Iredell County. We also recommend that the County Com- missioners provide additional space forthe séveral offices, No. 165 State vs Alvie Gant No. 169 State vs Spurgeon Crisp No. 170 State vs Spurgeon Crisp Arlee James No. 171 State ve Clarence King John King Robert Moore Spurgeon Crisp CH Chatman — SS Se ee -—-~ SD a net ce ee et Respectfully submitted, R L Poston Foreman of Grand Jury BIGAMY The defendant comes into open Court and through his coun- sel Lewis & Lewis pleads guilty of Bigamy as charged in the bill of Imdictment. It is ordred and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the comnon jail of Iredell VYounty for a term of TWO YEARS, and assiged to work on public roadsn of said county for said period, LARCENY The defendant comes into open Court and through his coun- sels Lewis & Lewis pleads gulity of larceny as cherged in the bill of Indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the court that prayer for judgment be comtiuned, HIGHWAY ROBBERY Continued to next term as to Arlee James. The defendant Spurgeon Crisp comes into open Court and through his counsels Lewis & Lewis pleads not guilty of Highway robbery as charged in the bill of indictment. Jury No. 1 after being sworn and impanellédgreturned a verdict of guilty. It isn ordred and adjudged by the Court that prayed for judgment be continued. CAR-BREAKING, HOUSEBREAHING? LARCENY AND RECEIVING. The defendants Clarence King and Robert Moore come into open Court and plead guilty of car-breaking, housebreak- ing, larceny and receiving as chargedv in the bills of indictment. The defendants John King, Spurgecn Crisp & C H Chatman come into open Court and thr@ugh their respective connsels John L Davis Gnd Lewis & Lewis plead not guilty of the above indictments. Jury #2 after being sworn and @mpanelied for their ver- dict, find;the defendant Spurgeon Crisp guilty as to all charges,the defendant John King guilty of receiving stolen Booms knowing same to be stolen, the defendant C H Chatman not guilty. : It ie ordred and adjudged by the Court fhat the defend- ant Clarence King be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THREE YERRS, and assi . to work on public roads of said county for said period, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defend- ant Robert Moore be imprisoned in the common jail of = County for a term of KIGHTEKN MONTHS, and assigned to work — of public roads of said County for Said period. oo lag ( CONTINUED) OVER ee Eee, a ae = i} —— He...171 State vs Clarence King John King Robert Moore Spurgeon Crisp C H Chabman No. 179 State vs Eddie Hughes No. 174 State vs John Loyd Tuck Horace Moser No. 146 State vs Clarence Eller No. 53 State va R O Kyles No. 60 State vs R O Kyles JANUARY TERM, 1926 TUESDAY JANUARY 26, 1926. = ~~ o —— a CcC CO SO OS SO SO OO SO ; ( 4 i : ) § ) ) ) 4 ( 4 } ~~ aS Do Soe SS CONTINUED FROM OTHER PAGE) It is opdered and adjudged by the Court that. the a. defendant John King be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of BHREE signed to work onzpublic roads of said County for said period. ; It a®péarthegrtordheeCouné thdtdtia Sefehndafibunt Spubgebn Crispdpitadsgutdtty of Karpheny #26Berpdrwag foumd guilty of Highway robbery #170. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be impr prisoned in the common jaio of Iredell County for a term of ; nd assigned to work on public roads of said counby for said period. LARCENY The defendant comes into open Court and Pleads guilty of larceny as charged in the bill of indict- ment. it appearing to the Court that this is the third or fourth time that the defendant has been in Court, charged with felonies. It further appearing to the Court that he is under the age of sixteen years of age, and he is adjudged to be an incorrigible crim- inal. Sentence imposed is that he be confinsd in the Morrison Training School for the wayward colored boys, until such time he may be discharged from the school, FORGERY Defendant John Loyd Tuck comes intoopen Court and pleads guilty to forgery as charged in the bill of indictment. Defendant Horace Moser pleads not guilty. Jury #1 after being sworn and impanelled for their verdictc find the defendant guilty of forgery as charged in the bill of indictment, ‘It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the @efendants each be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a pertod of THREE YEARS, and as- signed to work on public roads of said county for said period, to wear stripes, CARNAL ABUSE TO FEMALE UNDER SIXTREN YERRS OF AGE; plea of Nol Contendre as to prostitution, which Plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. N@l Prosed With ae Leave as to other *judghent b Snrpayment of th 1 @ costs of _ action, which time has been extended to May Term of Court 1926,, Defendant to appear at May Term Gourt 1926 and show that he has compli ed made restitution to the girl, with the order ne FALBB PRETENSE Continued under former order, GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS, : Continued under former order, and ee JANUARY TERM, 1926 TUESDAY January 26, 1926. No. 8@ f State t vs 4 John D McGlamery No. 163 ¢ State : vs ! Columbus Taylor 4 No. 154 ) State § vs , Will Walson t ABANDONMENT, Continued by consent, i Disposing of Mort zage propsrty Continued by consen G. FALSE PRETENSE Continued by consent. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning February 1, 1926, at 10:00 O'clock A id. dge the 15th ng ° ng Judicial Bistrict, North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. { Brown Contracting Company R M Hudson Company and Maryland Casualty Company. ) ) vs 4 4 } § This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Honorable T D Bryson, Judge pres#@ding at the January Term, 1926 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the claim of plaintiff has been vaid by the Maryland Casualty Company; and it further appearing to. the Court that the State Highway Project Number 659 in Iredell County was completed on the llth day of October, 1923; and it further appearing that this suit was brought on the bond set forth n Plaintiff's complaint under the provisions of chapter 100 of the Bublic Laws of 1923, in which said suit all persons entitled to bring and prosecute actions on said bond had a right to intervene and set up their respective claims within twelve months, as orovided by law; and it further appearing to the Court that notice was published in the Statesville Landmark giving the title of the case and noti- fying all persons that the plaintiff herein brought an action, the purpose of which was to recover of the defendant the amount due in which said notice all persons entitled to bring actions on the bond set forth in plaintiff's complaint were notified that they had a right to tntervene therein and set up their claims provided such intervention be made within twelve months from the bringing of satd acton; and it further appearing that said notice was published on January end, January 9th, Jantary 16th, and January egrd, 1925, and it further appearing to the Court that no party has inter this action within’ t) vened in part of any other parties to intervene and set up their elaims ag required by law, the notice required by law having been given 25 ’ ing to file their claims and inter @ll persons so fail- vene in this action are now hereby bar- red from proceeding further against the bond set forth tn the Plaintiff's complaint under the Provisions of chapter 100 of the Bublic Laws of 1923; NOW THEREFORE, On motion of counsel for defendant ’ Maryland Casualty Co- mpany, it is ordered, Considered and adjudged that the costs of this action be taxed against the defendants; that all creditors of the contractor on State Highway Project Number 639 and allpersons entitled to pri ng an action on the bond set forth in plaintir f's Complaint, having failed to intervene in this acthon within the time required by law, be and they are, barred under the provisions of «hia Ghapter 100 of the Public Laws of 1923, to proceed further in any court against the said defendant, Maryland Casualty Company, _t D Bryson Judge Presiding. ee North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 January Term, 1926. A K Goodman and J K Goodman ve JUDGMEN®, Ww HK Selby This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T D Bryson Judg Presiding , and being heard, It is therefore on motion of Z V Turlington Attorney for the plaintiff, ordered and adjudged bhat the appeal of the plaintiff in this cause, be and the same is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered that the cost be taxed against the plaintiffs, TD Bryson Judge Presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANU ARY TERM 1926. MONDAY Feb 1, 1926 THE SECOND WERK In the Superi or Court é Second week January term Feb 1 1926 North Carolina; oe Ba IredellCounty; This HonorableCourt meets according to adjournment at 10:00 O' clock A M Monday Morning Feb 1 1926 when and where His Honor eB Bryson, Judge Presiding and holding courts ofthe 15th judicial district ofNorth Carolina, is presentand presiding, this the secondweek for Civil cases at January Term 1926, M P Alexander, the HighsSheriff of Iredeil County, North Carolina, re- turned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as Jurors of this Court for Second week for civil cases, to-wit: C P Galliher, S ® Lytton, RE Godfrey, F Lilestmoreland, 0 C Stonestreet, A M Adams, H Y¥ Mott, Jr., Blair F Moose, R D Christopher, C BHill, C A Alley, TR Wilson, DL McLelland, J A Hobbs, TC Crouch, BC Deal, QF Bell, /S V Brown, The following were excused for lawful causes; TL Adams, N 5 Mills, W A Mil- holland, H R Gatton and wa Jones; The following was returned as "Not to be found in Ipedell County": Claud Allen, North Caro’ ina; In the Superi orCourt Iredell County; William Torrence Vs JUDGMENT J C Brookshére This cause coming on to be heard at the January term of Iredell Superior Court, before HisHonor, TD Bryson, Judge Presiding, and the aboveentitled ease and the Plaintiff being called to hiss appeal and fai ling to do so, being reached fortrial, ap a t pear and prosecute it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court, that the Plaintiff, William Torrence > be and he ig hereby non-suited. T D Bryson, Judge Presid ings _IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926. MONDAY PRBRUARY 2 1926 S48COND WEEK No 224 - A W Dula VS North Carolina State Optometric Society et als - Con'td No 157 - T D Shuford VS VY R Hart, and summers & McAuley & Stearns Bros. Encorpo- rated - Continued No 160 - W C Moore VS DG Wilson - Continued No 209 J 5 Colt & Co VS E Pruette Hager - Yontinued by conseht No 252 In re Will John B. Burton Caveat - continued by consent NO 22 - Mrs William Vallace Jury withdrawn, Mistrial ordered. Plaintiff allowed 30 days § 0 vs q t American Express Co No 246 Floyd Murdock ” ISSUES Lela Batley Murdock i Did the Plaintiff and defen dant intermarry as alleged in the com- plaint? Answer, Yes, 2, Has plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the Stat of North Garolina for two year. prior to tne bringing of thisaction, Answer, Yes, 3. Did the defendant commit adultery asalleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, No 246 Floyd Murdock V8 JUDGMENT Lela Bailey Murdock This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before His Honor, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, and the issues submitted to the Jury having been found in the plaintiff's favor,; thereforg, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff, Floya Murdock, and defendant, Lela BailevMurdock, be, and they are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff, Floyd Murdock, is granted divorce abso- lutefrom defendant, Lela Batley Murdock; it is further ordered that pldmntiff Pay the cost of thisaction, to be taxed by the clerk, T D Bryson Judge Presiding. IN ‘in WwW PEnDTOR VvOuRY JANUARY TERM 1926. Feb 1 1926 S@COND WEEK - nc Olina: In theSupeior Court or Sar : Iredell County: January Term 1926 “tatesville Cotton Mills VS ISSUES H G Welborn 1 Did the defendant fraudulently convert to his own use goods and merchandise of the plaintiff as alleged in the Complaint? Answer : Yes. 2 If so, what amount, if any is the plaintiffentitled to recover against the defendant? Answer: Principal of $2690.48 and interest on that amount from June llth 1924, No 251 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredl1 County; January Term 1926 Bennett Patterson Vs ISSUES Alda ae ae oe 1. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North 4 WP fetorine for more than five years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, 2. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry asalleged in thecomplai nt? Amswer, Yes: more than five years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superiorcourt IREDELL COUNTY; Janury Term 1926 Mrs Klla M Sharpe as Guardian of Miss Louise P Sharpe Vs JUDGMENT Seabord Air Line Railway Co This cause being called and it appearing to thecourt that the pla ne tiff in this action is a minor ana i 8 duly represented herein by her guardl Mrs Ella MSharpe, who has been duly and regulary &ppointed such by the cler of the Superior Court of Iredeli County: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926 Feb 1 1926, SE@® ND WEEK And it further appearing that said action is for a personal injury to said infant, Miss Louise P Sharpe, which hhppened to her on or about November 23rd, 1925, when one of the defendant's trains collided with an automobile in which she was riding at a point where the Public highway crosses at grade the tracks of the defendat, in consequence of which the said Miss Louise P Sharpe suffered an injury to her left foot and ankle and other injuries to her person; And it further appearing to the Court thatthe Parties hereto have agreed to compromise and settle all matters at issue between them growbng out of theaforesaid injuries to the said Louise P Sharpe by the defendant paying the plaintiff the sum of 61,650.00, and that said mrties desire the sanction and approval of the Court in order to make said agreement binding, effective and valid by reason of the fact that Plaintiff's ward, MissLouise P Sharpe, is a minor, and the Court heving investigated the facts involved in said personal injury to the said Miss Louise P Sharpe, for the purpose ofascertaining whebher or not there was actionable negligence on the art of the defendant, and also to learn the extent of the injury to plaintiff's ward, and having made such investigation and having examined witnesses who had personal knowledge of thematter, all for the purpose of enabling the Court to determine whether or not it is for the best interest of said minor, Louise P Sharpe, that plaintig¢ compromise and settle all Claims, action or causes of action, which said minor now has, or may hereafter have against the defendar t by reason of said personal intury to the said Louise P Sharpe for the sum of $1 2650., and the Court being of the opinion, after having made such investigation, that itis to bhe best interest of Plaintiff's ward, Louise P Sharpe, that the matters at issue in this action becompromised and settledand that the plaintiff as guardian ofsaid minor accept and receive from the defendant the sum of $1,650. as a settlement infull for all damages whatsoever which have heretofore, or which mav here- after arise, by reason of the injuries received By the said Louise * Sharpe growhng out of the 6ollision by defendant's train with the car in which she was riding as above set ont: It is, therefore, cinsidered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that it is to the bestinterest of Plaintiff's ward, Louise P Sharpe, that the matters at issue in the above entitled case be compromised andset+led, and that the Plaintirr as suardian for the said Louise P Sharpe receive and be paid by the defendant thesum of $1,650. as a settlement in full for all damages what- Soever by reason of the personal injury plaintiff's ward received and of the matters and things alleged in the complaint, = ‘paar a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN tiles tad ay. ees JANUARY TERK 1926 dese aa Feb 1 1926, SE@® ND WEEK No 248 In theSupeior Court And it further appearing that said action is for a personal injury to North Carolina: January Term 1926 gaid infant, Miss Louise P Sharpe, which hhppened to her on or about November Iredell County: 23rd, 1925, when one of the defendant's trains collided with Si “tatesville Cotton Mills which, she was riding at a point where the public highway crosses at grade the VS , tracks of the defendat, in consequence of which the said Miss Louise P Sharpe H G Welborn suffered an inifury to her left foot and ankle and other injuries to her person; 1. Did the defendant fraudulently convert to his own use goods and e And it further appearing to the Court thatthe parties hereto have merchandise of the plaintiff as alleged in the Complaint? agreed to compromise and settle all matters at issue between them growbng out Answer : Yes. ; of thesforesaid injuries to the saia Louise P Sharpe by the defendant Paying 2. If so, what anount, if any is the plaintiffentitled to recover the plaintiff the sum of $1,650.00, and that said prties desire the sanction Principal of $2690.48 and interest on that against the defendant? Answer: and apnroval of the Court in order to make said agreement binding, effective and amount from June llth 1924, valid by reason of the fact that plaintiffs ward, MissLouise P Sharpe, is a minor, and the Court having investigated the facts involved in said personal injury to the said Miss Louise Pp Sharpe, for the purpose ofascertaining No 251 whebher or not there was actionable negligence on the m rt of the defendant, and North Carolina In the Superior Court also to learn the extent of the injury to Plaintiff's ward, and having made Iredall County; Yanuary lerm 1926 such investigation and having examined witnesses who had personal knowledge of thematter, all for the purpose of enabling the Court to determine whether Bennett Patterson or not it is for the best interest of said minor, Louise P Sharpe, that plaintig vs ISSUES Compromise and settle all claims, action or causes of action, which said minor Alda Patterson aon Ml : now has, or may hereafter have against the defendar t by reason of said personal cl, Le PF figtoiine for more than five years prior to the comencement of this action as infury to the said Louise P Sharpe for the sum of $1,650., and the Court being Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North 7 of the opinion, after having made such investigation, that itis to bhe best interest of pla ntiff's ward, Louise P Sharpe, that the matters at issue in this alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, Pam . ties . POs action becompromised d settledand that the plaintiff as uardian ofsaid &. Did the plaintiff and defendant internmrry asalleged in thecomplai nt? Promised and settledan Pp gz minor accept and receive from the defendant the sum of °1,650. as a settlement Amswer, Yes: infull f mage t r rere h . ere- 3. Have the plaintirr and defendant lived separate ot enue ml or all damages whatsoever which have heretofore, or which mav h after arise, by re ries received By the said Louise * Sharpe more than five years prior to the Commencement of this action as alleged in 92s ason of the injuri v ° the complaint? Answer, Yes, : Srowhng out of the sollision by defendant's train with the car in which she "as riding as above set ont: NORTH CAROLINA: It is, therefore, cinsidered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that it In the Superiorcourt IREDELL COUNTY; {s to the bestinterest of plaintiff's ward, Louise P Sharpe, that the matters Janury Term 1926 at issue in the above entitled case be compromised andsettled, and that the Mrs Klla M Sharpe as Giardian of 4 Miss Louise P Sharpe . Plaintiff as guardian for the said Louise P Sharpe receive and be paid by hie JUDGMENT 4 the defendant thesum of $1,650. as a settlement in full for all damages what- Seabord Air Line Railway Co | seever by reason of the peraonel injury plaintiff's ward received and of the - matters and things alleged in the complaint, & cause being called and it appearing to theCourt that the pla n- tiff in this action is & minor and i Mrs Ella MSharpe JANUARY TERM 1926 Feb 1, 1926 Second Week It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the agreement of com~ promise and settlement entered into by and between the mrties hereto be and the same is hereby in all things sanctioned and approved and it is therefore ‘is ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum:of $1,650 as a settlement in full for all damages whatsoever by reason of the pers > sonal injury received by plaintiff's ward, Louise P Sharpe, at the time and on the occasion mentioned in thecomplaint, and the defendat, upon the Pavment of this judgment, shall be forever discharged from any and all other and further liablility to the saidLonise P Sharpe by reason of the personal injury received © by her at the time and on the occasion set out in plaintiff'scomplaint: It is further adjudged that the plaintiff recover the cost ofaction to be taxed by the Clerk of this Cort. T DBryson Jydge "residing. By Vonsent: AL Starr, Attvs for Plaintiff Grier & Grier Attys for defendant, NORTH CAROLINA: In the SuperiorCourt Before the Clerk IREDELL COUNTY: Janunyy 25 1926 Harry H Evans Minor, by R L Davidson, Guardian VS CONSENT JUDGMENT BEFOR THE WL Neeley, BA Sutton, and ¢ ¢ Stearns, a partnership. trading and doing business under the firm name and style of Neeley Motor Bxpress CLERK FOR APPROVAL BY THE JUDGE This cause coming on to be heard and appearing to the Court thatthe parties thereto have compromised their differences; it is therefore considered, Thirty ($30.00) Dollars, and the Cost of this action to be taxedagainst the De- fendant. This judgment i mise by the prtias to this action, and apnears to be a fair anda just settlem ant; e ’ while Harry vans ig represented by hi sUncle j ay This January 25 1926, R L Davidson JA Hartness Clerk of the Accepted by Guardian for Plaintirr Suverbor Court WL Neely, Accepted B A Sutton, Accepted C C Stearns, Accepted, K LDavidson, general guardians IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926, Fev 1 1926 SEOND WEEK NORTH CAROLINA: IREDSLi. COUNTY: in the Superi or Court Before the Clerk Harry H Evans, “inor, by * | Davidson, Guardian, Vs WL Neeley, B 4ASutton and cc Stearns a partnership trading and doing business under thefirn name and style*of Neeley wotor Express ISSUES ~~ ist. Was theplaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendants as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, 2nd; Whatdamages has the plaintiff Sustained and surfered thereby? $30.00 Answer. :NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court :IREDKLL COUNTY: January Term 1926 Harry H Hvans Minor by R L Davidson, Guardian, vs JUDGMENT WL Neelev, B A Sutton and CC Stearns, a Partnership trading and doing business under the firm name and stvle of Neeley Motor xpress This cause coming on to be heard before HisHonor T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, and having been heard, and issues upon submission to theJury being answered xx favorable to the plaintiff as herein set out. "Ist: Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendants? Answer, Yes, end: What damages has the Plaintiff sustained and suffered thereby? Answer, $30.00 " Wherefore Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of Thirty($30.00) Dollars together withthe gost of this action is hereby confirmed and &ranted azainst the defendants. Thisix lst day of Feb 1926 T D Bryson. Judge Presiding. CO@GE@ CH This Honorable Court takes a recell until Tuesday Morning, Feb R, 1926, at 9:50 O'clock A M, 6sid ae courts Tor 15th Fuasotts District oft : = Oi ui wer Veal oe i JANUARY TERM 2986 TUESDAY FEBRUARY 2, To26. This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment Tuesday Morning, February 2, 1926 at 9:30 O'clock A* M. for the dispatch ofbu- siness. No1157 : ta -thiscase—thedeathof the defendant, 7D oo Continued WR Hart & Summers; McAuley & Stearns Brothers; No 4 Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N.C, { In this case the death of the defendant, DA ) Sean suggested leave to make his representa- § tives to this action. § i 4 VS DA Beam & L A Beam ( No 210 - WW Rankin Co VS J V Newton & Lizzie Poston Newton - Continued No 207 - Mrs D J Williams vS Rc Querry et al - JUDGMENT taken before the Clerk.@n the calendar through error, No 215 - AR Bowles vs WH Belk & J M Belk - Judgment before the Clerk. No 8 WY T Webster & W J Matheson vs JUDGMENT <- VOLUNTARY No? SUIT BY THR PLAINTIFF J S Setzer It appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff comes into open court through hiscounsel and takes avoluntary non suit, Therefore re, Tt 18 ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintire be non suited and pay the Cost of this action to be taxed by the clerk of this Court, This Honorable Court takes & rece&s until Wednesday Morning, February 3, 1926, at 9:30 O'clock A.M See ng Olding courts for the 15th Judicial District of North Garolima, North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: Before the Clerk Statesville Cotton Mills § { vs JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUIRY H G Welborn 4 , This cause coming on to be heard upon the record and Pleadings, and it appearing therefrom that the defendant has been duly served with summons, and warrant of attachment issued in this case, by publication, and that the complaint duly verified was filed in this office on October 29th, 1925, and the defendant has filed no demur or answer to the complaint, although the time for filing such pleadings has elapsed; And it further appearing from the complaint that this action is brought to recover the value of 10 cases of yarn amounting to 4,345 paunds, property of the plaintiff, which the defendant fraudulenty converted to his own use, all as alleged in said complaint: Lt :i9, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiff recover of the defendant the value of said goods and merchandise 80 fraudullenty converted to his own use by the defendant, and to that end it is ordered by the Court that an inquiry be had by a jury at the next term of Superior Court of Iredell County, or as soon thereafter as the same can be brought to the attention of the Court, to ascertain the value of said 10 cases of yarn and the damage plaintiff has sustained by reason of the defendant fraudulentxy converting the same to his own use, and this Cause 1s transferred to the trial docket of Superior Court of lredell County for the purpose of trying said issue by a jury. This the llth day of Jan. 1926, J A Hartness Clerk of the Supertor Court Iredell County — eu ei 2m We ot JANUARY TERM 1926 WEDNESDAY, FEBRBARY SRD, A.D. 1926 This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, Wednesday morning, February 3, 1926, at 9:30 O'clock A.M. for the dispatch of business. No 248 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: January Term 1926 Statesville Cotton Mills Co vs H G Welborn This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before his Honor, T D Bryson, Judge presiding, and a jury, and the Court having submitted to the jury the issues set out in the record and the jury having answered said issues so submitted as set out in the record as- sessing plaintiff's damage at $2,690.48 with interest thereon from July il, 1924, And it further appearing to the Court that an attachment was duly and regularly issued in this case to the Sheriffof Davidson County, N, 6., and that under said warrant of attachment said Sheriff of Davidson Sh Movenge, County did, on the 29%h day of Geteber, 1925, levy on all the right, title and interest of the defendaht HG Welborn in the 10 tracts or parcels of land in Davidson County, N.C. mentioned and described in the Sheriff's return on said warrant of attachment, It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintirr recover of the defendant the sum of Two Thousand Six Hundred Ninety and 48/100 ($2,690.48) Dollars, with interest thereon from the llth day of July, 1924 at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, It is further considered and adjudged bhat this judgment be and the same is hereby declared to be a lien upon all the right, title , and interest which the defendant had on the a day of 1925 Q ’ a», in the lands upon which the warrant of ment in this action was levied by the Sheriff o or at anv time thereafter, attach-_ f Davidson County, con- sisting of 10 tracts or Parcels of land in sai eribed in the of attachment, and that execution issued under this Judgment direct § the sale of the said right, title and interest of the defendant which he had in said any of them on the aonb day of lands or 8 thereafter. adjudged that the plaintirr recover the Clerk of this t > Bryson, further ordered, Considered and its cost of this action to be taxeq by Court, Judge Presiding. JANUARY TERM 1926 WEDNESDAY PEBRUARY 3, 1926. No 196 " North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: January Term 1926 wc Hinshaw vs JUDGMENT J V Mize This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Court before HisHnor T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties have compromised ali matters in controversy in this action, defendant agreeing to pay plaintiff the sum of $300.00 in full of all demands, accounts and liens held by the Plaintiff against defendant, which plaintiff agrees to accept as a full discharge of all said demands, accounts and liens. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendant the sum of $300.00, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding By consent: Lewis & Lewis, Attys for Plaintiff Grier & Grier, Attys for Defendant This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning February, 4, 1926, at 19:50 O'clock A. M. = Ora ofaing Coisee Gr the 15th Judicial District. Suge Oet 2 1924, JANUARY TE°M 1926 THURSDAY FEB 4, A D 1926 This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, Whursday morning February 4th, 1926, at 9:50 O'clock A M for the dispatch of business, North Carolina: In the Supertor Court Iredell County: January Term 1926 Cleveland Feed Company vs ISSUERS John L Schultz & Son Inc 1. In what amount, if anything, is the piakmxciee? defendant, John L Shultz & son, Inc., indebted to the Plaintiff? Answer: $614.85 with interest from Jan 17 1925, Be te: tHe interpleader, City Bank and Trust Company, the owner of the drafts in question and entitled to the proceeds thereof? Answer: No, North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: January Term 1926 T Ross Alexander, Inc vs ISWES John L Shultz & Son Ine te in what amount, ifanything, is the defendant, John L Shultz and Son Inc., indebted to the Plaintiff? Answer: $237.46 with interest from Nov 1 1924, 2. Is the Interpleader, City Bank & Trust Company, theounen as the drafts in question and entitled to the Proceeds thereof? Answer: No NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR ¢ IREDELL @® UNTY JANUARY Eee fe Kriesman & Israel vs Dillon-Vitt Underwear Co} ISSUES ‘. the pl Did the p aintiff falsely and fraudulenty represent to the defendant that the Sight singer Sewing machine Company machines Style No 52 W 12 were of the chain stitch variety | 73 and would develop a speed of 3600 stitches per minute, as alleged in the answer? Answe ¥ Y: Yes the Plaintirer indebted to the Claim, and if 80, 2. Ie defendant on its counter- in what amount? Answer: $6,000, & interest from 4 THE SUPERIOR COURT ANUARY TERM 1926 THURSDAY FEB 4th 1926 a D North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: J E Garris vs JUDGMENT OF NON SUIT Stearns Brothers Inc In the above entitled action plaintiff comes into Court and takes a voluntary non suit. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff be ana he is hereby non suited, T D Bryson Judge Presiding aie a a ad North Carolina; In the Superior Court Iredell County: Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N.C., L L Troutman and Christy Brothers in behalf of themselves and all others, creditors and stockholders who may come in and make themselves plaintiff to this action. REPORT OF SALE vs ' t 4 ) ) ) § 4 4 Carolina Iron Works, Incorporated TO THE HONORABLE SUPERIOR COURT: The undersigned Receiver of Carolina Iron Works, Incorvorated, pur- suant to an order of the Superior Court, made in the above entitled matter, after due advertisement, offered for sale on the 30th day of December, 1925, the entire plant of the Carolina Iron Works, Incorporated, and same was bid in at the price of $2,050.00 by mr J ? Brantley who now stands ready to pay the purchase price for same, In view of the fact that the machinery and equipment of the said Carolina Iron Works, Incorporated, has been duly advertised according to law in the leading daily papers of the State and has been left open for advanced bids since Said sale and none havé been received, I am of the opinion that it would be useless to re-advertise said property for sale, and that such action would not Secure any greater bids than that offered and would only result in additional delay and expense in wirding up said business, and I therefore re- Scomend if it meets the approval of the Court, that said sale be approved. Grier, Receiver, Carolina Iron Works, Inc. i — en ae as aie IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY FPEB 4 1926 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville N.C., LL Troutman and Christy Brothers, in behalf of themselves and all other creditors and stockholders who may come in and make themselves plaintiff in this action. JUDGMENT -Vs- A Se Carolina Iron Works, Incorporated This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, and being heard upon the report of the Receiver touching the sale of said property under the former order of the Court, and it apnearing to the Court tha said sale wasoopenly and fairly made after due advertisement and that no advanced bids have been placed on said property after said sale, although it has remaindd open for this purpose from the 40th day of December, 1925; and it further ap- pearing to the Court that there is no probability of receiving a better bid for said machinery and property: It is, therefore, considered, adjudgedand decreed that the sale of the entire plant of the Ca-olina Iron Works, Incorporated, to Mr JT Brantley for the sum of $2,050.00 be and the same is hereby in all respects approved and confirmed, and the Receiver is ordered upon the payment of the purchase price and every part thereof to deliver the said provertyv to the purchaser agreeably to the terms of said sale, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding. he eee ete ee NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court IREDELL 0 UNTY: January Term 1926 T S Patterson vs D B Stearns costs have been paid as agreed; to withdraw his apveal: It is ordered and adjudged that thi S action be, and the hereby rezoved from the ‘ same is Superior Court docket of Iredell County . oo Carolina, North T D Bryson Jud, | : } ge Presiding By Consent: Lewis & Lewis Atty8& for Plaintirr John A Scott Atty for Defendant Shih eat see spay re * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926. THURSDAY FEB 4 1926 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: January Term 1926 wd Mullins vs JUDGMENT J £B Dooley This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard befo~ His Honor, T D Bryson, Yudge Presiding, and a Jyry, and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the record in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $1900. (Eleven Hundred Dollars) together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 3rd day of September 1925 until paid, and it is further adjudged by the court that the defendant pay the cost of this action. T D Bryson Judge Presiding Tete eb se4t eet North Carolina: In the Superior Court IredellCounty: January Term 1926 Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co vs JUDGMENT Electric Supply & Construction Co This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, at the January Term of Iredell Superior Court 1926, and it appearing to His Honcr that the parties have compromised this action on the following terms, to-wit: The plaintiff to recover of the defendant the sum of $858.00 to gether with tmukaxagtkxxx the costs of this action, and to return to the Plaintiff the following described property. ”. 2 Symphony Console Keceivers 5 2-Stage Svmphony Receivers 1 3-Stage Symphony “eceivers 1 #601 Variable Condenser 2 #602 " ee 2 #603 8 2 # 604 ed 2 #606 " 2 #551 Reppnducers 1 Hall Mark Reproducer Tt ic therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the de- fendant the sum of $858 together with the costs of this action, and further ‘hat the defendant return to the plaintiff in this cause of action the above Sescrided Property, This Yebruary 4 1926 . T D Bryson Judge Presiding * we ina zt ; oer elmer, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926 THURSDAY FEB 4 1926 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: January Tem 1926 DW Speaks, Administrator C TA of C A Wise, deceased, VS JUDGMENT Mrs VY L Lambert, Executor of Mrs Matilda Wise, deceased, T H Williams, “YY Mayhew and C F Neal This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before Nis Honor T D kryson, “nudge Presiding, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the varties have compromised and settled all matters in controversy in this action between them, it sbeing admitted and agreed by said parties that there remained in the hands of defendant's testatrix, Mrs Matilda “ise, at the time of her death $2,550.00 belonging to the estate of her deceasedhusband and Which was received by her in the due course of the administration of the estate of her said deceasedhusband, and that the said Mrs Matilda “ise, Administratrix of her deceasedhusband, C A Wise, was entitled to one half of sata sum as distributee of sata estate, and that the remaining one half of said funds belongee to D W gneakea Admin- > ww “ > istrator U 7 Ve + as. a ee trat 4 . os he sai » A Wise to be used by him as such Adminietrates the surplus to be distributed to the next of kin of C A Wise other than ; se, cher t¢ the said rs Mati] Y anemia 1 “yrs Matilda Wise aecease ie or her Sxecutrix, Mrs w L Lambert. It is therefore eonsidered and adjudged that the plaintiff : ’ Administ ator C 7 - a mevee © © A.0f 0 A Wias, Gecanesd, suuceer of the defendant, Mrs. V L Lambert, hxecutrix of Mrs Matilda Wise, deceased, ini in a ss iene sand Two Hundred ana Seventy-five ($1,275.) Dollars, together with the cost of this action to be taxea by the Clerk of this Court T D Bryson, Yudge Presiding By consent: Lewis & Lewis Attys for Plaintirr Grier « “rier, Attys for Defendant North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: January Term 1926 R F Gwaltney & wife L B Gwaltney bd R 4 Mason IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926, Thursday Feb 4 1926 This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, and being heard before “is Honor T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, and it apvearing to the Court after the jury was called and empanelled and evidence introduced bv both plaintiff and defendant that the varties agreed upon the following settlement of the matters in dispute between then: 1. that the land in dispute, to-wit: BEGINNING at the stumphole, formery a stump, referred to in the evidence as the "Pointers" corner, and running south 4 deprees west with the red line on the map 74 poles to E near a small Pine; thence west 21 poles to Ked A, Pine stump, formerly ‘ine Tree; thence north 20 degrees east with the Black Line on the map 77 poles to the sumphold, be- ginning, corner, be equally divided between the plaintirf and the defendant, and that Surveyor, S O Lazenby, go upon the land and run from "Pointers" corner C, stumphole and run, makk and establish a line such degrees south as will divide the above described and equally between the plaintiffs and the defendant, establishing a corner between theri at the south end of said line between A and EF on said map, which is hereto attached and made a part of thisjudgment, and make a renort of this to the Court to be filed in thise case, 2. That each of the parties are to pav their own witnesses and the cost of their own process, and each are to pay half of the court cost. 5. That the perties are to each Day one half of the cost of running marking and establishing the line as above agreed to. 4. That the defendants is to pay the plaintiff $25.00 in 30 days from date hereof and is to cancel the judgment which he holds against the plain- tiffs, R F Gwaltney, taken before w J Lazenby J P It is therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the line be run from "Pointers" corner C on the map such degrees south to a point between A and E on said map, equally dividing the land in dispute in this action between the Plaintiffs and the defendant, and that said line go *stablished be and the same is hereby declared to be the true Qividing line between the lands of the plaintiffs and the defendant, and that S O Lazenby be and he is hereby ordered to run and establish said line according to said Settlement and to report the same to this Court within 30 davs, and to furnish the plaintiffs and the defendant each a copy of said survey of said land. It 4s further considered and adjudged that each of the parties pav half of the Court cost in this acti n and pay his own witnesses including therein the proceas of each of the parties, bears al at arte tai ee 4 a | | | | | ' i ee tection wanna IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926 THURSDAY FEB 4 1926 It is further considered and adjudged that the defendant pay the plaintiffs $25.00 within 50 days from date hereof and that said defendant cancel the judgment against the plaintiff, R F Gwaltney, taken before W J Lazenby, and that this judgment shall be and is hereby declared to be cancellation of said judgment. It is further adjudged that the plaintiff and defendant each pay half of the cost of running, marking and establishing the line hetween them as hereinabove ordered, T D Bryson, “udge Presiding. bv consent: R F Gvaltney Fisintitf Kk H Mason Vefendant. North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: Before thd Clerk Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co & coryvoration vs f ’ 2A M P Critcher, an tndividnal doing business under the name and stvle of the CritcherHotel, at Boone, North Csarotina, JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND IN UIRY * « oe eon r this) cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of srs ed, k - . * ( oul red 11° WwHttw es I 2Upe DY , xu © I fay i ounty na 4 . r a = ’ ar { ne oO the Cour c fr om the record in th g : he case, that summons was personally served upon the de fendant on the lst dav of October 1005 , é *760, anc a verified copy of the plain- tiff's complaint x -teoc ylair BLxAARhahanxkaesy x served therewith on said date; and it id date; ; p bE f , Oo he ¢ ur t t { 4 Y oe b . tht bt th 9e arty f ur ner , , 20 sha 4 sh 8 8 a apr ac I 5 4 ¥ al. p ain barr Lu 7‘ t 0 recover of che defendant she Slum of $55 upon ove “pos le yey account "or x a 8 f o0o0as old and deli vered by the Dlainti z to the defend } { } 11m 4 , a1an 49 WwW 4 > sur bears nt res ror gm ¢ 92 5 unt Yr’ Y Y a { YD 5 i e 2 i O 4 9 l T Da a . si ne ent t nearty £ x! av s§ x cen » a a ‘ furt t er to 2ne Co 1 G sha » mare than twenty acaves have elar sed j ce the , oc sin service of saia } aid summons, and verified complaint upon the def vNG Aefendant and the defendant has f 1a8 fa led to annear and ftle an answer to th 1 rt 6 plaintiff'scom- tissue of Ff * fact for the determination of the fury Plaint, raising an © 4&6 ip n ¥ 2d reed th + = e laf $$ S en-=- It { 8 th ¢ oO OY erec ar a dec s 4 p © C sk a h n titled to recover of the defendant in this ti > 8 actior have fudgment by default 1 and that the Plaintiff the fury t ni sue be sub : v¥ to determine the amount of said ree aig : overy, ordered that the defendant nav th “+ 49 farther i‘ Ma) fe co Sts of this &ction, This Noy 30 J : Hartness r court for IredellCounty. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1926 Feb 4 1926 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: January Term 1926 Iredell Upholstered “urniture Co a corporation Vs MP Oritcher an tndividual Trading as Critcher Hotel 1. In what anount is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? $557.00 and interest from Aug 9 1925, Answer: North Carolina: In the »uperior Court Iredell County: January Term 1926 Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co a corporation VS JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL M P Critcher, an individual Wwe trading as Critcher Hotel This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His 4tonor, + D Bryson, and a jury, and being heard, and it apvearing to the Court that in this action judgment bv default and inquirv was taken before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 450th dav of November 1928 said cause of action being on open account for goodssold and delivered in the amount of $557.00 And it appearing to the Court that the Jury impanelled in this action in the Superior Court has answered the issue submitted to itas as set out in the record in favor of the plaintiff and against the de- fendant: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $55% with interest ther on at 6% from the 9th day of August 1925 until paid and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of thés Court, T D Bryson Judge Presiding. JANUARY TERM, 1926 Thursday February 4, 1926. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. $§ January Term, 1926. J J Hartigan and Carey C Bodhammer, partners,trading and doing business under the firm name and style of Cleveland Feed Company. -Vs- JUDGE ENT, et ee John L Schultz Sons Co. Ine, This cause coming on for hearing at this Term of the Court bes fore His Honor, T D Bryson, Judge presiding, and a jury, and the jury for their verdict having answered the &ssues submitted to them in favor of the Plaintiff as set ont in the record: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, John L Schultz and Sons, Inc., the sum of Six Hundred Fourteen and 85/100 Dollars with onterest from Jans nary 17th, 1925m until paid, and costs of this action to be taxed by the @ Clerk of this Court, And it appearing to the Court that as an ancillary proceed- ing to this action the plaintirr caused the funds in the Commercial Nationp al Bank of Statesville, Nort” Carolina, in the sum of $1103.92, paid to it on drafts issued on sundry parties by the defendant, to be attached in this action, when the City Bank & Trust Company of Syracuse, New York, en- tered an interpleader ana alleged it was the owner of said draft and fund d 7 xv rj . aforesaid, and filed a replevy bond in the sim of $2,207.84 with United ' i Fidelity & (maranty Company of Baltimore, Md., as surety It is further considered and adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiff recover of the City Bank & *rust Company and United States Pie delity & Guaranty Company of Baltimore, Md.,m its Surety, the sun of ‘ a ’ 3 db ‘ vEpS07.84 to be dis charged upon the Payment of the judgement aforesaid of $614.85 with interest and cost, T. D. Bryson fudge Pres ing, JANUARY TERM, 1926 Thursady Febratiry 4, 1926, North Carolina, ' In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ' January Term, 1926, T, Ross Alexander, Incorporated -vs- JUDGMEN®, John L Schultz and Soms, Inc. Et Al This cause coming on for hearing at this Term of the Court be- fore His Honor, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff as setv out on the record, It is therefore, considered and adjuedged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, John L. Schultz and Sons, Inc., the sum of Two Hundred Thirty Seven and 46/100 Doliars, with interest from November lst, 1924., until paid and costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, And it appearing to the Court that as an ancillary proceeding to this acton the plaintiff caused the fumds in the Commercial National Bank of Statesville, North Carolina, in the sum of $1103.92, paid to it on drafts issued on sundry parties by the defendant, to be attached in this action, when the City Bank & Trust Company of Syracuse, New York entered an‘dinterpleader and alleged it was the owner of said drafts and fund aforesaid, and filed a replevy bomd in the sum of $2,207.84 with United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company of Baltimore, Md., as surety. It is further considered and adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiff recover of the City Bank & ‘rust Company and United States Fidelity % Guaranty Company of Baltimore, Md., its Surety, the sum of $2,207.84 to be discharged upon the payment of the judgment afore- Said of $257.64 with interest and costs,. T. D. Bryson Judge Presiding o, 251 In the Superior Court, La i L Kllis Haves, Admr of M L Campbell vs Columbus Campbell.- Continued, orth Carolina, 3- Mrs Louisa Hayes vs Columbus Campbell. = Continued, January Term, 1926, redell County, 4- Merchants & Farmers Bank Mooresville vs D A Beam and L A Beam Continueg, sONTT NITE nnet Patterson ) J H licklwee vs Hutton and Bourbonnais Co. - CONTINUED en > ” vr" ~ VS» J Keller and wife vs Charlie Hicks and wife. CONYINUED i jJda Patterson Statesville Lumber Co. vs Kk L Church and G S Grant. - CONTINUED Statesville Lumber Co. vs Kops Harris and Kd Nicholson, CONTINUED, This cause coming to to be heard at Davis,Director General of Railway vs Cleveland Mfg Co. nd being heard before His Honor, T. D. Bryson, Judge Pre and jury, “TUTONIN WUKD, 4 +4 1 tear he jury hav ing answered the issues submitted Davis,Director (reneral of Kailway vs Statesville Veneer Co. no yh tt CONTINUED, lst. Has the pls L B Hollar vs Jessie Miller, = CONTINUED. arolina for more than five years prior to Statesville | Te L 'Y Westmoreland, « CONTINUED. n the comple int? i Statesville Lwnber ¢ 7s N ( Holmes et al. = CONTINUED, mStatesville Lumber ( Dorsett Fraley et al, - CONTINUED Statesville,Inunber C N @ Holmes et al = CONT NUED,. > ‘ 1 Statesville Lumber C VS “ G Holmes et al ~ CONTINUED, K Westmoreland vs A Westmoreland, <- CONTINUED, J A Westmorealnd va sii % Westmoreland, # CONTINUED, Hillard Summers vs Gertrude Summer - CONTINUED, Bank Stony Poi Da ittle n et CONTI UD. therefore, ordered, adjudgre nd decreed by the Court that 7. } > anc . T -an rs 5 y . t 1 17> : : i. aa fe a ae - : ae ee oe E ile ae ~ CONTENUED. bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintif ennett Ff terson M Deaton the defendant Alda Patterson be, and Freeze 7% Civorce granter e icGowan 1 Valtan Bantam cs fn NIT 1 ( menrowan vs Walter Heckham et al. # CONTINUED. It is further ordered by the Court s Dickens vs W 3 SouthBrand Pearl Souther. cost of this action y the Clerk of this Court. y > son ‘ ‘ vs Herman Pierce, - CONTINUED, dge Presiding 15th Judicial District. vames Carter, - © YINTINUED, Qt in + 7417 hoe ny ae Statesville L umber Co. vs J T Chappell and Alice Chappell. CONTINUED: Tri- State Transpo At ot x Dy peace “Pansportation Co. vgs Stearns ] 10 : ‘ rity Company. = CONT UED. Bros.Inc. and Globe {ndemnit} Vielj 198- 3 A ] , sos 1 a . owe VS © & Ferry and © a Hart line.- CONTINUED. .. 2 { mas 199 S Abley vs c A Hartline and J A Perry, - CONTINUED £14 Carl H Mathis vs c dat ‘ 1 H Mathis vs Cleo Mathis, - CONTINUED, 247 Mooresville O11 Co. vs Stearns Bros. Inc, - CONTINUED 2.0 O Wk © of No 204 ) Kreisman & Israel ) vs } Dillion-Vitt Underwear Co. 4 A rlaintifre lodges a motion to set assigned and to be assigned at the hearing of 4 Motion is continued until the Court of Iredell County, without predudice to at which time ana Place the motion will orders made or fudement Signe aside the verdict for errors said motion, March Term of the Superior either party litigant, North Carolina, § fn the Superior Court, Iredell County. $ Befare the Clerk, Peoples Bank, a corporation, -vVs=- JUDGMENT, i. 4 SS > eet Mrs M S Brawley, Admrx of R V Brawley, deceased;R L Shuford; J N McElwee;Roger G Moore and Mrs Lanra S Moore Admp and Admrx. of C D Moore. _— This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Hon, J. A. Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of LIredell County, North Caro- lina, and it apnearing to the court that the action is based on a promissory note for Two Thousand ($2,000.00) Dollars with interest thereon at 6% from maturity, May 21, 1923, and if further appearing to the Court that a copy of the note is set out in the complaint filed December 18, 1925, which com- plaint is verified, and that the amount due is fixed and certain, and that a copy of the complaint was served along with service of the summons herein on each defendant, and it further appearing to the Court that sumnons issued out of this court on the 17th dav of December, 1925, under seal thereof re- turmable on the 30 day of December, 1925; that s&id summons and complaint was filed and served on the defendant Shuford on the 18th day of December, 1925; that service of the orighmal sumrions was not vrocured withih the time of service and an alias summons against the remaining defendants was issued bybthis Court and served along with copies of the conplaint, on the remaining defendants, other than defendant R L Shuford, on the 12th day of January, 1926; that alias summons issued January 2, 1926, return- able January 15, 1926; and it further appearing to the Court that no. answers have been filed in this Court by any of the defendants, and that the time for answering has expired, and that /further time has been asked in which to file answers, and that action now stands for judgment as of this date,-- It is therefore, on motion of Wilson Warlick, Attorney for the Plaintiff, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff do have and "ecover judament of the defendants in the sum of Two Thousand ($2,000.00) Dollars, with interest thereon from the 21st day of May, 1923 at the rate of 6% per annum, together with the cost of this action, as taxed by the Blerk of this Court. This Monday, February 8, 1926. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. ShSEIESE URE RE beet Se2hsecrt | Sesetese seat - Fe | ~™ re i" i ; me a North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 9 Before the Clerk. Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, a Corvoration. -va- JUDGE SP Tt. M S Brawley, Admrx. of the HKsate of R V Brawley, deceased, R L Shuford and J A Davidson, SS ee This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, & Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on Monday, the 8th day of Feb- ruary, 1926, and being heard upon the evidence introduced by the Plaintiff and it apvearing to the Court that this 1s an action by the Peoples Loan and Savings Bank to recover judgment uvon a written instrument to-wit: a promis- sory note executed by the defendants and that summons was i@sued in this ac- tion by the Ckerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 13th day of January, 1926, and that a copy of the stmmons and the plaintiff's verified complaint was served on the defendants, J A Davidson and MS Brawley, Adnin- istratrix of the estate of Kk V Brawley, deceased, on the 13th day of Jan. 1926, and that acopy of the sumnons and the plaintiff's verified complaint was served on the defendant, K L Shuford on Jan. 14th, 1926, oh and it appear- ing to the Court that none of the defendants have file: an answer or any other pleadings wit vin twenty days from the date of service on them of said verified complaint and summons, exclusive of the dav of service, and it ap- pearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff upon their promissory note in the amount of $3203.77, with imterest at 65 per annum from the 14th day of Decenber 1925, until paid ana that the said amount {ts past due and thmt demand was made by the plaintire upon all of the defend- ants for payment of said sum prior to the instution of this action: : ’ ’ It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged that the plain- tiff have judgment against the defendants, no issue of fact having been rais- ed by an answer or other pleadings on the part of the defendants within the time allowed by law; due by the defendants to the pn} aintiff 1s the sum of $3203.77, with inter- est at 6% per ann It is ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defend- ants the sum of $5203.77, with interest from the 14th day of December, 1925 until, paid at six per cent per annum, and the costs of this action to be tax- ed by the Clerk of this Court. Dated Monday, Feb. 8, 1926, oe Hartness Caerk Superior Court. North Carolina, § In the Superior Court. Iredell County. J Béfore the Cherk. R L Rogers & J F Orren va JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL B F Putnam & wife Lula B Putnam This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk ofthe Superior Court on Monday, February 8, 1926, and being heard; and it appear- ing to the Court that service of summons in this actfon was duly made up- on the defnadnts on the 14th day of January, 1926 by delivering coptes of the summons tnd copies .f the verified complaint to the defendants, BF Putnam and wife Lula B Putnam; and the defendants havin@ failed to file an answer within twenty davs after service of said summons and verified complaint in said action; that s&id suit is upon a stated account duly verified due by the defendants to the Plaintiffs; and it appearing to the Court as set up in the complaint that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Three Hundred and 25/100 ($300.25) Dollars and interest thereon from May 18, 1924 until paid : It is therefore ordered, decreed, and adjudged that the plaintiff meceover of the defendants the sum of $500.25 and interest thereon from May 18, loe4 until paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This February 8, 1926. J A Hartness Clerk Stiperior Court WES eT Ee bt St oe ad North Cardbina, |} In the Superior Court, , Iredell County. } Béfore the Clerk. Ella Parks vs JUDGMENT OF NON#SUIT G A Hunter, J M Deaton and EF Morrison This cause coming on to be heard, and bétinmg heard, and it appearing to the Court that the defendanteG A Hunter, one of the joint makers has paid the note in full, and same has been transferred by the plaintiff, withput pe- course on her to a truistee for the use and benefit of G A Hunter solely to presenve his rights of contribution as against his foint maker A B Johnston, And the plaintiff having requested permission to take a@ voluntary nonsuit, and the costs in this action of $9.25 having been paid by the defend- ant. [It is therefore, ordered and adjudged thatvthis action be and the same is hereby dismissed as uvon a jud-ment of non-suit. February lst, 1926, J. Ae Hartness Clerk Supertor Court. By Consent: Attorney for the Plaintiff: wW A. Bristol Skee eee We Attorney for G A Hunter : John A Scott North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk, C L Gilbert vs JUDGMEN T. Mason H MacKnight,Admr of G L McKnight, deaeased, and J M Deaton, This cause Coming on to be heard and bein & heard before the under- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of February, 1926, a note, » and the defendants having accepted service of Summons on the llth day of January e oo? 1926, and the defeninats Mason H McKnight, administrator of G L McKnight deceased is principal on said note, and same was éndorsed by J M Deaton as surety on said note. It is therefore , ordered and adjudged bv the Court that the plaintaff recover judgment for the sum of $300.00 together with inter- est thereon from the 6th day of October, 1923, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum with costs of this action taxed against the defemdants, Mason McKnight Administrator of G ZL McKnight, deceased, as principal, and against J M Deaton as endorser or surety on said note, It is further adjudged that the property of the principal be exhausted before issuing execution against said J i Deaton, This February 22, 1926. J A Harfness Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County,N C IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM, 1926. North Carolina, Iredell County. } Owing to the prevalence of sickness in this community and county > . “9 we, the undersigned court offigials amd members of the Bar, deem it unwise to hold the March Term of Court commencing Monday, March 8th 1926, and for that reason agree that said Court be discontimued. This the lst day of March, 1926. Board County Comm. By A L Lowrance, (Clerk Zeb V Long i ce John A Scott Eid Land ow FP Dain Jno L Davis Jas W Sharpe D L Raymer SD A Hartness mow Bryson, North Carolina, On the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk,. John Clark vs JUDGH RE J S Waugh, Mason E Brown, C H Brown and J B Wanhgh. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the iunder- signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, the 15th of March, 1926, and it appearing to the Court that summons: tnmsthis action was issued on the 12th day of February, 1926, and served or. the 16th day of February, 1926, by reading and delivering copy of summons and copy of the complaint to each of the defendants; and it further appearing to the Court that duly verfified complaint was filed in said cause on the 15th day of Pebruary, 1926; and if further appearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $544.13, together with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 10th Gay of June, 1924, until paid; and that said amount is a certain fixed amount; and it further appear- ing to the Court that the defendants have not filed an answer in the time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover from the defendants the sum of $544.13, together with interesttat the rate of six ner cent per annum from the 10th day of June, 1924, until paid and that the costs of this action be taxed against said defendants, This March, 15, 1926. J. A. Hartness Clerk of Superior Court. (XDA ALAM AAPA A AD CO OH FAO) North Carolina 4 ’ In the Superior Court, 4 Iredell County. § L A Thompson § $ vs i JUDGMENT. ) 4 R G Brown and J E Dooley This cause coming on to be heard at the January Term, 1926, of ‘he Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing fo the Court that 11 ers in controversy have been settled and adjusted between the a matte oe thas by the payment to the plaintiff by the defendant Brown of the part: } ' ee sum of $56.00 ft 13 now ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing » of the defendants by this action and that the defendants go with- more o t . q Zé \ out dav. ft 1g further ordered and udjudged by consent, that the defend. an@ésKhrown pay the cests of this actton. [t is further ordered and adjulged,by consent, that each party pay his own witnesses. T. D. Bryson JudgesPresiding Lawts ay for plafnt oo ee maw Mof ’ a. A . Thig cause comt Oo be heard and {tt appearing to the Court matters in controvarev } all matters in controversy h settled and adfusted between varte and it further apnneart, , BE /Ourt costs have been paid, is is Ai i rdered and ad fy lyrad with of the plaintiff, that the plaintiff ake nothing more of the dafara, oe " 7m (WET tendan his action and that the action be and 1s hereby dismntas 3ed, v This 20th day « March, ] LY¥Z6 J. A. Hartness saci Clerk of Siipertor Court. By consent: BE. li, Land Attorney fop Plaintit?, (Qa MOOT ay {a ND BQO Oi North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } ww Kankin Co. 4 vs § Y P Cavin and Mre W P Cavin. } This cause coming on to be heard before J A Hartness, © SC on Monday March 22, 1926 and being heurd and {t appearing that the complaint properly verified was fibed on March 35, 1926 and it further appearing that a copy of the complaint and the summons in the said case were served on the defenfants on the 27th day of February, 1926, and it further appearing that te complaint is based on a promissory notes and account for goods sold, and it further appearing that more than 20 davs have elapsed since the serv- ing of the summons and the complaint and that no answer has been filed, It 1s therefore on motion of V Turlington, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the stm of 5406.68 with inter- est on 9250.00 from Nov. 15, 1925, with Iiniterest on $50.00 from Sept. 2, 1925 and on 55.68 from Nov. 1, 1925 and the Monday March, 22, 1926, J. A. Hartness Clerk Supertor Court. t (es ek dat Qh AU Qe North Card@lina, 4 In the Superior Court, Tredel} County. § Statesville Lumber Co. vs RK F Gwaltney This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, ahd being heard, and it appearing to the Court thas this is an action for breach of an express contract and capable of being ascertained therefrom by computation. And it further appearing that the summons, together with copy of the Complaint, was Personally served on the defendant and that said complaint duly verified was filed in this office at the date of issuing said summons; * = /~ a a Os a And it further appearing that twenty days have elapsed and ex- pired since the service of the summons and complaint on the defendant, and ¢ that defendant has failed to answer said complaint, or file other pleadings within the time allowed by law; And it further appearing that the defendant is due the plaintirr the sum of T¥O THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINTY NINE and 57/100 ($2,999.57) Dore LARS, with interest thereon from the L[abgtday of December, 1923; It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $2,999.57, with inter. est thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the lst day of December 1923.5 until paid, togebher with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Monday 22nd day of larch, 1926, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Gamurt. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Béfore the Clerk, DT Trivette vs ORDER REVIVING JUDGMENT, N G Holmes, Dorsett Fraley and Lewis Fraley, Jr. This cause coming on to be heard before J A Hartness, Clerk of Supe erior Court of Iredell County, and being heard and it apnearing to the Court that a judgment was rendered in the above entitled case in favor of the plain- tiff and against the defendant, on the 7th day of June 1917 for the sum of $100.00, and for the further sum of $1.90 costs,which judgment was décketed on the judgment docket of said court on day of June 1927: and it further » 1927; appvearing to the court that the Plaintiff in this cause has filed with said court andaffidavit braving that said Judgment be revived, and that on the 18th day of March 1926, a notice was issued to the defendanta to appear be- fore the undersiged Clerk of Court on the 29th day of March 1926, and show . ae e Cause, if any they had, why sata Judgment should not be revived; and it furthe } ur r appearing to the court that said notice above referred to was duly e Pa Seen, BO. Rotman, wid Aen ein Holmes failed to appear and show cause, It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged anda decreed by this court that the said judgment be revived and that an execution issued against the pro- perty of the said N G Holmes for the amount of $100.00 princinal and in- terest on same. It is further ordered, decreed and adjudged that the defendant, N. G. Holmes, pay the cost of this action, This the 29th day of March 1926, J. Av Hartness Clerk Superfor Court. QMO?’ ARHA QO G2 CQQRQQCA North Yarolina, | In the ©unerior Yourt Irddell County. Before the Clerk. DT Trivette vs ORDER REVIVING JUDGMENT, N. G. Holmes and Dorsett Fraley. This caus® coming on to be heard before J A Hartness, Clerk of Super- ior Court of Iredell County, and being heard and it appearing to the Court that a judgment was rendered in the above entit&@éd case in favor of the Plaintiff and against the defendants, on the lst day of September L917, for the sum of $150.00, and for the further sum of $2.00 costs, which judgment was docketed on judgment docket of said court on the 11th day of September 1917; and it furhher apvearing to the Court that the plaintiff in this cause has filed with said court a affidavit praying that said judgment be revived, and it further appearing that on the 18th day of March, 1926, a notice was issued to the defendants to appear before the undersiged Clerk of “ourt, and show Cause, if any they had, why said judament should not be revived; and bt further appearing to the Court, that said notice above referred to was duly served on the defendaht, NG Holmes and the said N G Holmes failed to appear and show Cause; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the said Judgment we revived and execution issued against the property of said N. G° Holmes for the amount of $150.00 principal and the interest on same from the first day of September 1917, It is further ordered, decroed and adjudged that the defendant, N. 9. Holmes, pay the cost of this actibn. This the 29th day of March, 1926. J A Hartness er uperior Yourt. QB CAEL) COAABER @annIAaER North Carolina, § In the Buperior Court, Iredell County, } Afpil 12, 1926. Comnerc&al National Bank of Statesville, N. C ( dl IDG! 1h] IT D¥YFAULT FIN AL e 4 4 ) 4 j itaker coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of of Iyedell County, on Monday 12th day of April, 1926, and being heard, and i& appearing to the Court, that summons was issued against the defendants on the 27th day of February, 1926, and returnable the 15th dayq of March, 1926, that s&id summons was duly served on said defendants complaint in this action was filed February iff's cause of action was founded upon a con-= tract under seal » being promissory notes for the nayvment of money, one in the sum of 400000 dates and due ninty days after date, and one for $300.00 dated July ' je% and due three months after date, and that laint was dulv fied, and it further appearing that more than ys have elansed 1 the urn date of said summons, and that no answer has been filed MIR WOR W CPoONnatiAran 3 . A ane . OEE COnsLGered, ordered and adjudged bhat the plaintiff hay iudgment against the defana rq } y idem against the defendants by default for want of an answer, which Judgment by Default is } Ss nereto entered, and it is further cone sidered ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff, the Commercial National Bank of Statesville North Canalir Yr tiie North Car@lina recover of the defendants K K Litaker and Ola Iital s Pog and Ola Litaker, the sum of Seven hundred and sixty dollars and sixty cents, Dn necting ¥ nt o y rincival and interest 0; the notes aforesaid, with interest on $700.00 from February 27, 1996 . until paid and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, « 4ARTNESS Superior Gourte Caedax RAS Ah Yea ANYON AK ay North Carolina, In the Superior, Court, Iredell County. April 12, 1926. Commercial National Kank of Statesville, N. C. vs JUDGMENT DEFAULT FINAL, Ola Litaker and Husband K E Litaker and S M Summers This cause coming on to be heare before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard on thés Monday the 12th day of April, 1926, and if appearing to the Court, that the summons in the action was issued February 27, 1926 and served on said defendnats March Sy L026 and that the complaint was filed in the office of the Clerk Februany 27, 1926, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date mention in the sumions, and that no answer has been filed to said complaint, and it further appearing, that the plaintiif's cause of action &s founded on a contract for a sum certain based on a note under seal dated 24th day of October, 1924, for the sum of 5.400.000 payable thirty days after date to the plaintiff in this action, ITSIS THEREFORE, considered,endered and adjudged that the plaintiff have judgment against the defendants Ola Litaker and S M Summers by default for vant on an answer, and it is therefore considered ordered and adjudged, that the Plaintiff the Bommercial National Bank recover of the defendants Ola Litaker and S. M. Summers, the sum of Three Hundred Twenty Two Dollars and Seventy Cents, with interest on $300.00 principal, from February 27 1926 until paid and cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. J. A. Hartness aaa Clerk Superior Court. QOWIYI2QWDIA DARA 4D CQIWDVIADAIBAGAQ North Carolina, ' § In the SuperiorbCount, Iredell County. 4§ April 12, 1926. Commercial National Bank of Statesville, N. Cc. vs JUDGMENT DEFAULT RINAL Ola Litaker and husband K E Litaker, li J Moore and hus- band Will Moore, te et a ee | aerate een en Sa seememeneetemeiaieen Teena ee ee ee | | : | eee This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Syperior Court of IredellmCounty, and being heard 6n this Monday the leth day of April, 1926, and it appearing to the Court that the summons wag issued on 27th day of February, 1926, on the defendnats Ola Litaker and her husband K E “itaker,. Mid Moore and her husband Will Moore, returnable the : 15th day of larch, 1926, and served March 3, 1926, and the complaint in said action which was duly verified was filed in thés Court February 27th, 1926, and that the plaintiff's cause of action was founded on contract under seal one dated the 2th day of October, 1924, being a note due the Plaintiff for 2620.00 due and pavable ninty days after date, and a note dated November T; 1924 and due fifteen davs after date, for %500.00 each of said notes being Signed by Ola Litaker and M J Moore, amd that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return day named n the summons, and no answer has been filed, IT IS THEREFORE, ordered, that the plaintiff have judgment aga- inst Ola Litaker amd M J Moore be default for want on an answer, And it is further considered opdered and adjudged that the plaintiff recower of the defendants Ola Litaker and M J Moore the sum of One housand One Hundred Ninty Nine Dollars and Eight Cents, with interest on $1120.00 from the 27th day of February until paid and the cost of this action to be taxed n by the Clerk, J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court. QIDIIAD IMA MY Y QALIDIVDIV North C } 1 Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, G y April 12, 1926, Commercial National Bank of Statesville, WN. c, vs JUDGHENT DEFAULT FINAL. H E Hedrick and R L Bradford trading as Bradford ana Hedrick, and H E Hedrick and R L Individually, Bradford, ee ee This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superi : 8 or Court of Iredell County, and being heard on this Monday xh the 12 7 ‘ th day of April, 1926, ana it appearing to the Court that summons was issued against said defendants 27th day of Februar e ae 1926 a March 15, 1926 ana served on sa ye renner id defendants March 5, 1926 and that the com- plaint im siad acbion was duly verified an@ filed February 27, 1926, and that the plaintiff's cause of action was founded on a contract under seal for a sum certain, for borrowed money, and on the 12th day of November 1923, executed their promissory note, payable to the Plaingiff's, and due ninty days after date for the sum of $485.00 with interest,twhteh note was Signed "Bradford and Herdick",(seal) H. EB. Hedrich(Seal) and endorsed by R L Bradford, and on the 12th day of November, 1925, H E Hedrick, Bradford and Hedrick, defendants,, gave their notes to said bank umder seal in the sum of $340.00 with interest thereon, and that on part of said notes have been paid, and that the same are now due and payable to the plaintiff, and that morethan twenty days have elaps- ed since the filing of the complaint, and the return date fixed in the summons , and that no answer has been filed to said complaint. IT IS THEREFORE, considered ordered and adjudged, that the plaintiff take judgment by default against said defendants for want of an answer, TT IS therefore,further ordered and adjudged, that the Commercial National Bank of tatesville, N.C. recover of the defendants H BE Hedrick, R L Bradford, trading as Bradford and Hedrick, and against H E Hedrick and R » Bradford, Individually the sum of Nine Hundred Thirty Kight Dollars and Three Cents with interest on $825.00 from the 27th of February,1926 until paid, and the cost off the action to be taxed by the Clerk, _ Js A, HARTNESS Clerk Superior Court. Rib et eek tbe Rie eet eit North Carolina, 9 In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § January Term, 1926/ J. T. Smith et al ) FINAI, REPORT OF RECEIVERS AND ORDER CONFIRMING SAME vs Iredell Farmers Union Warehouse Co. § To fhe Judge Prediding at January Term of Superior Court of Iredell Coumty: z The undersigned Receivers of the Iredell Farmers Unin Warehouse Company, & Corporation in the State of North Carolina, with its principal place of busi- ness in Statesville Morth Carolina, respectfully submits the following report of ‘heir transactions as receivers of said corporation. Pursuantyvto the order of Court, the Receivers after due notive con. J P Ingram account $19.07 verted the assets of the Iredell Farmers Union Warehouse Co. into cash and rady account 31.00 collected all the soivent accounts due said Company, and the following is » ad Bait sod J R Morrison account an an account of all moneys collected and all moneys disbursed: H S Morrow account 10.75 CHARGES D K Hoke account 5.40 Received from sale of stosk of goods to H S Douglas $2,881.94 Fletcher Morrison account 3.50 Received 55256 Mrs M L Lawson account 10.80 Received from sale of real estate to WB Gibson 13,'700.00 8 C Willer accpunt 9.236 Received Interest on deferreG payment of said sale. 411.00 Orphans Home account 6.00 Cash and checks in cash drawer 57.19 | p C GC Shoemaker account 4.00 J W Vickery account 18.60 Bob Moore account 2.15 R S Boyd on account 67.18 Star Milling Co account «eo Holland Bres. on account 75 R L Poovey on acconnt 6.88 R S Boyd on account J F Winters account 28.45 ee a eee L O Chester on account R S Boyd on account 155.50 Wade Campbell on account “TO 8 L Stafford on account 50.00 F H Alexander on account. 10.00 Cash in bank unaccounted for 140,17 P Patterson and S G Caudae on account 6.80 J C Roseman note 105.04 ) A Miller on account 5.70 Check by T S Barkley 19.25 Taylor on reants 100.00 TOTAL CHERGES - : $19007 .34 a | i | : F Meachem on account §.45 J E Miller on account 4.20 Soren gereieeeeee cement: seeetenenet steiner essilieamas Miscellanous goods sold 14.80 DISBURSEMENTS J D Ostwalt account 7.80 The Landmark for advertising $30.30 oO L Webb account asa Statesville Sentine’ advertising 2.50 F P tpoutman account nan Mooresville Enterptize advertising 5.00 G & Baine Caudle accounts ; 42.90 é City of Statesville Taxes 194.40 3 R Ramsey account M P Alexander, taxes 119.64 11.00 E S Morrison account 7.50 ae : " 235.04 Rev. E S Cashwell account + ae City of Mooresville taxes school 14.01 Hughey Templeton account. 90.80 City of Mooresville taxes £7.91 WJ Marlin account 55 J P Patterson for laber 60.00 F H Alexander account = on PM Cline for labor 58.00 N A Lewis account 20.40 J B Houston for labor 149.25 R S Bovd on account 40.00 WC Perry auctioneer 5.00 State Farm on account 146i J@ Nichols “ * 2.50 R S Boyd account a | Stam 14.25 66760 a P for deed ote A F Tucker acco: 4 &ccoung Realty & Investment Co. aime Pront Street Presb t yterian Church 61.93 Dorman Thompson Atty, fee ene Neal Plott Grocery Co, : a Oo. rent 945 °%e P P Dulin on commissions me ea lott Grocery Co. r 2 ent roc DL Raymen on commissions oe cnetineeneenecalaee er ee caleemettie os pecan ore ee ee BM Anderson ; (45% dividend) Anderson Bros , Gulf Refining Co. Virginia Carolina Hdw Co. DM Ferry & Co, The Sun Linseed Oil Co. Statesville Grocery Co. Mayhew & McNeely Iredell Telephone Co. A Balance Sulivan Co. The Ackron Kefining Co. Statesville Grocery Co, Morris & Co, Smith Yoosley Co. Statesville O11 Co, Southern Ratlway Co, W C Feere C A Wooley Color & Paint Co J P Coilins Mrs M J Sherrill fredell Telephone Co. Hi@h Point Broom Co, Southern Railway Co, Internationel Agricultural Corp " . Statesville Realty & Inv't Co.account " Morris & Co. J K R Shoe Co account " B Gibson Notes BM Cline Note C M Wagner note Commercial National Bank First National Bank M & F Bank Mooresville, n.G, M & F Bank Statesville, N.c, Peoples Loan and Savings Bank Paid J F Carlton for bond International Agricultural Corp. " ” Final Dividend to seneral creditors of 14% Balance due receivers on commissions Balance on hand to pay costs and Stenographerss fees TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS, $56.54 5.24 5.43 78.55 59.73 19.65 8.06 95.80 5.87 24.51 85.64 58.20 50.64 5.29 57.06 41.71 /4.35 i77sae 137.39 416.52 4.07 4.27 16.68 128.25 7 <7s 21.81 92.88 5,359.28 1,399.05 561.24 989.83 692.77 470.25 958.99 1869.75 15.00 2250.60 357.46 145.00 8.94 eet $19007.34, Having fully reported the transactions in the above matteer as Receivers, the undersigned receivers request that they be discharged from ¢ further liability and be reaeased on their bond, Respectfully submitted, Pr. Fe. Dilin _. D. L. Raymer oe ecelvers, a This cause coming on to be herad before the undersigned Judge Presiding at January Term of Superior Court of Iredell County upon the report and final account filed by said P P Dulin and DL Naymer, Reveivers and it appearing that all transactions in connections therewith have been closed, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the report of said receivers be accepted and approved and that they be discharged from fur- ther liability on their bond, T. D. Bryson Judge Presiding, QADQXDDA S ADA VAX® QOMAL > @@ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, 4 Iredell County. 9 Before the Clerk, Carolina Discount Corporation. ) { * vs { JFUDGMENT, 4 4 BB Gillelana Q This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- Signed Clerk of the Superior Court on Monday, the 19th day of April, 1926, and if *ppearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 23rd day of March, 1926, and served on the 29th day of March, 1926, by reading and dehivering copy of the summons and copy of the complaint to the defendant; and it further appearing to the Court that duly verified complaint was filed in said Cause on the 24th day of March, 1926; and it further appeaing to the Court that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $353.60, together with ae en cement ettamema cere Reet ree ee Se Aeeshcieetiaene ieeeememniemenamndeennmentoeneeie ee neny interest on same at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 2nd day of February, 1926 until paid, and that siad amount is a certain fixed amount ; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant has not filed an answer in the time-allowed by law; It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintirfr recover from the defendant the swa of $353.60,together with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 2nd day of February, 1926, until paid, and that the costs of htis action be taxed against said defandant, This the 19th day of April, 1926, J. A. Hartness ieee ame ies baciiesdhions ‘CS a North Carolina, 4§ the Superior Court, Irddell County. $§ Mrs Edna Love-Caldwell Adiarx, of L C Caldwell, Deceased, § vs H EB Hedrick & J A Morrow This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the defendants have been duly and regularly ser- wit symp 1 ved with summons, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the re- + + turn dayg and the defendants and Gach of them having failed to appear and Answer or Demur, and i+ furt ‘ . ; ‘ urther appearing that the action is to recover on a note under ge; the wah OR ‘ seal, and that a verified Complaint has been filed, and the plaintiff having established her claim to the satisfaction of the Court it is t ( aed ts therefore, on motion, considered, ordered and adju- dgzed that the Plaintiff ree over of the defendants the sum of $250.00 prinei + + + cipal, with interest on she said sum from May 28, 1923 until paid, at the ' fee > a > . rate of si . Six per cent, and it is further adjudged that the plaintiff recover the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk This the 19th day of April, 1926 J. A. Hartness ~ Clerk Superfor Court. QVDIW Ayr aw Q2QY 22AVWE@ North Carolina, In the Superior Yourt, Before the Clerk. Iredell County. Mondays oAprihe19} «2926, B. B. Colt Company, a Corporation. vs JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL MT Warren This cause coming on to be heard before the Court upon the plead- ings and the evidence introduced by the Plaintiff, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff caused to be tssued from the Superior Court of [re- dell County on the 10 th day of March, 1926, a summons returnable on March 25, 1926, and it appearing to the Court that a copy of the Plaintiff's veri- fied complaint was served upon the defendant, MT Warren, on March 13, 1926, and also a copy of the summons, and that the defendant has not filed any answer or made appearance in this action and no issue of fact for the jury having been raised by the defendant and that more than twenty days have elapsei since the service upon the defendant of the summons and verified come plaint, exclusive of the day of service; That this is an action upon a promissory note for an amount cer- tain which can be arrived at by mathematical calculation, due by the defend- ant to the plaintiff; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff have Judgment against the defendant by default final for the sum of $241.85, with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the lst day of Nevember, 1923, until paid and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. J. A. Hartness QIQBIDDBQA HIAGAZX® DRADIBA XI WADE In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, Monday, April 19, 1926. North Carolina, 9 Iredell County, 4 J. B. Colt Company, a Corporation, ! vs ' JUDGEMENT BY DEFAULT PINAL. () ' JQ Warren This cause coming on to be heard before the Court upon the pleadings and the evidence introduced by the plaintiff, and it appearing ¢ to the Court that the plaintiff caused to be issued fremuthe Superior Court of Iredell County on the 10th day of March, 1926, a summons returnable on March 25, 1926, and it appearing to the Court that a copy of the plain- tiff's verffied complairit was served upon the defenfant, J Q Warren, on Mu March 13, 1926, and laso a copy of the summons, and that the defendant has not filed any answer or made any appearance in this action and no issue of fact for the jury having been raised by the defendant and that more than t twenty days have elapsed since the service upon the defendant of the summons and verified complaint, exclusive of the Cay of service ; That this is an action upon a promissory note for an amount certain which can be arrived at by mathematical calculation, due by the defendant to the Diaintiff; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged hx that the plaintiff have judginent against the defendant by default final for the sun of $291.85, with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annun from the lst day of Nove ember, 1424, until vaid and for the sosts of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, i. Hartness slerk Superior ourt. —_ = IN THE SUPERIOR CouRT MAY SERM MONDAY MAY 17, 1926,. A. D,. North Carolina, {| In the Superior Cotrt Iredell County. ‘1 May Term, 1926, Be it remambered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the state and County aforesaid, on the llth Monday after the first Monday in March, 1926, the same being the 17th dav of May, 1926, A.D., when and where His Honor, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the 15th Judicial District, Spring Term 1926, is present and presiding, and Hon. Zeb V Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the nam® of the State, M P Alexander, the High Sherriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of thisterm of the Superior Court, to- wit: The followingwere drawn and sworn as Grand-Jurors for the term: ZV Brotherton, J D Tucker, G L Crowell, R L Bradford, A W Johnson, C C Blankenship, Wade F Campbell, C A Kyles, C H Knox, C A Dry, J C Dellinger, JL Clontz, A G Woodruff, John D Mann, J 8 King, J L Lipe, B P ®uy, and H L Moore, R L Crowell was appointed and sworn as foreman of the grand-jury. O B Lazenby was appointed as officer of the Grand Jury. WO White was returned, "Not to be found in Iredell County." Gordon Scott, N M Blackwelder, J W Hussy, J W Current, J W McCoy, JL Hunter, and L R Fulp were excused for satisfactory causes, The following were drawn and sworn as petty jurors for the week: W Foster Sharpe, RR McNeeley, Gordan Wallace, W C Nicholson, A M Sloan, JG Gordan, 8 R Jurney and E E Avers. No 84 ABANDONMENT State Nol prossed with leave. vs John D McGlamery No 106 SPAKPPRARWEND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOUR State Alias Capias Vs Robert Rurr No 119 TRANSPORTING & POSSESSING LIQUOR. State Continued for the State. Va Melvin Tucker No 134 TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR rin Alias Capias 8 Buck Faulkner » & — py ed ? ie be eF— aac rn onkin eg eee sepeueintuncee ate ee a ! i i (I a No 148 State Vs Willy Bell No 160 State Vs Sam Holmes No 163 State vs Columbus Tavlor No 164 State vs Harvey Campbell No 170 State vs Arlee James No 178 State vs dohn Ritchie N@i90 State Vs Coleman Morrow No 180 State vs Brvin Goodman No 187 State vs Ernest Bost cack No 189 Atate vs Lonnie Reavis Th May 18th, lo26, MAY TERM 1926 Monday, May 17 1926, { LARCENCY ) Alias Capias § 4 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Continued uxdax by consent. DISPOSING OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY Nol prossed with leave TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOUR Defendant appeared and showed good behaviour, Continued underformer order, And that he bring a receipt from his father showing that he has paid him+the os Costs. HIGHWAY ROBBERY Continued for the defendant TO APPEAR AND SH GOODBEHAV [OUR Defendant appeared and showed good behaviour, Continued under formar order, ABANDONMENT It is ordered and ad judgedby the court that prayer for judgment be continued upon payment of the costs. LARCENCY The defendant, thru his counsel, comes into open O}court and waives will of indickment and enters a plea of FORCIBLE TRESPASS, It is ordered and erdered@ and adj ails : Judged by the Court that praver for judgment be continued upon payment of the costs of this action t 5A) } aoe. “0 be taxed by the Clerk of BEATING BOARD BILL Nol prossed With leave ac appearing to the court t that the action aga nst = ge coaent was frivolous and &@ malicious peonkoation " o6 ie ee witnesss, Flourie Leach, iinet ordered and adjudged by the Court that the peeps pine Witness, Florie Leech, pay the cost of this bion 6 taxed by the clerk of this court. oc oe ee SS POSSESSING LIQUOR The Grand Jury returned, "Not a true bill," =< << <> is Honorable Court ta at 9:30 O'clock A.M. MAY TERM, 1926/ Tuesday May 18, 1926. mis Honorable Court convened according to adjurnment at 9P30 O'clock A. M. Tuedsay May 18, 1926, for the dispatch of business. Fales Pretense. Bo'85. Continued under former order. State ) va f R O Kyles t GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS, No. 60- Contigiied under former order, State vs R O Kyles No, 154 FALSE PRETENSE. State Continued by consent. mo Will Wasson No, 157 § POSSESSING LIQUOR. State ” Coetigranttiee ' $ vs Doy Shoemaker No. 172 LARCENY AND RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY. State The defendant through their counsels Frank Grier and Z V vs Turlington comes into open Court and pleads not guilty of Espy Young larceny and receiving stolen goods as charged in the bill 6f Dave Byers indictment; re Jury No. L being sworn and empannelled for their verdict returns a verdict of not guilty. No. 179 ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. State The defendant comes into open Court and through his counseb vs Grier & Grier enters a plea of not guilty of assult with dead- WL Christy ly weapon as charged in the Bill Indictment. The Court after hearing all the States evidence in this action finds that the defendants is not guilty of assult with deadly weapon, WoOtee | Dancer xStwbe ' The xdtofentertocaneas int acapen- Count- and pleade- guilty of senponerny- ad ' 1 en -Aybemobixbecfiorx ser ase. Premio Oo DePape +-48- ordered- and adjudged ba the-Count- thatthe defend- FE hon yy ai eg eR GE I He AP a age egg § term of- FOURTEEN MONTHS- 5- end eecigned to wonk on public {- roeade- of- sei<t Co mty- -for- said peniod No. 183 DAMAGING REAL PROPERTY. State Continued by consent. vs Lester Weaver No, 188 ‘ State j ‘vs } Larence Heartly. § LARCENY Continued for Bill. No, 53 Stavo vs R o Kyles- FALSE PRETENSE -- Continued under former oreder. No. 60 State vs R 0 Kyles- GIVING WORTHLESS SHECKS.--Continued under former order. MAY TERM, 1926 TUBSDAY MAY 18, 1926. REPORT OF GRAND JURY May Term, 1926 To the Superior Court, Begknning May 17 Iredell County, 1 O O'clock A. M, Judge T. D. Bryson, Rresiding. We, the Grand Jury for May Term of Iredell County Superiop Court, 1926, beg leave to submit the following report: We have passed all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made retupns of same to Court. We visited the County Home by a committee of five and there we find forty@three inmates as follows: 20 white females; 10 white males; 5 colored females; and 8 colored males, We find in the insane department: 2 white women. They have 2 convicts; 2 mules; 29 hogeggl4 milk cows; and 1 Fordson Tractor. Committee talk- ed with several inmates and they all reported that their keeper, Mr, and Mrs Perry treeted them kindly, that they had plenty of nourishing food, was well prepared and served to them. We find the Home neatly kept, showing that the keeper was taking interest in the Home and premises, COURT HOUSE Inspection made by committee of seven. We find all the offices are neatly iept and records carefully filed for the conven- fence of those wanting to refer to same. We recommend that the County Commissioners have Benton & Benton, or some other reputable architect figure the cosb of excavating the basement of the Court House, whppe- by making additional room as we find the present offices have not suffisient room to keep their records and carry of the County's af- f airs as shold be. Upon getting the cost of this work, we recommend that tt > us contract be let and work completed at earliest date possible. JA IL Inspection made by committee of seven. Visited the jail and find ten pri : § . prisoners: 5 whites; 5 Colored; all males, They report the treat- ment rec 6ceived there very Satisfactory. We make the following recommend- ation hat the C 8, t the Ounty buy twelve hanging hammocks for beds, not to ’ cost over $2.00n each, 11 colored. Gated and have Plenty to eat. The chain Sang has 22 miles, all in 800d condition for work, with wagons, sor ° ape plows, Shovels, picks and other tools that are being used in the work, 2 guards, and 23 cots We find one man sick and ree ommend that he a be brought back to Jail whepe he can receive treatment © from a Phisician until he is able to go to have the above recommendations Porgant ° i Si Respectfully submitted, No. 185 State vs Jess Tuck No. 186 State vs Walter Houpe No. 191 State vs John Leonard altas John Riicker No, 192 State vs Cley Holland No, 182 State vs Franklin ¢C DePope No, 146 State vs ) Clarenge Eller ( 4 ' 4 é MAY TERM, 1926 Tuesday May 18, 1926. STOREBREAKING AND LARCENY. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of aaa and larceny as charged in the bill of indict- mente It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that on the charge for larceny the defendant be imprisoned in the com- mon jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO YEARS, and assigned to work on public roads of said County for said period. On the charge for storebresking prayer for judgment continued. MANSLAUGHTER The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of manslaughter as charged in the bill of indictment, It is ordered ahd adjudzed by the Court that the defend- entibe inprisoned in the Common jail of Iredell County for a term of not less than THREE nor more than FIVE YEARS, and assigned to work on public roads of said county for said peréda,. ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsels D L Raymer and P P Dulin pleads not guilty of assult with dead- ly weapon as charged in the bill of indictment. The Court after hearing all the States evidence finds that the defendant is not guilty of Assult with deadly weapon, SECRET ASSULT. Bhe defendant comes ito open Court and pleads not guilty of Secret assult as charged in the bill of Indictment, Jury No. 2 after being sworn and empannelled for their ver- dict returned a verdict of guilty. @t is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the State Penitentiary for a period of not less than FOUR NOR MORE THAN SIX YEARS at hard labor to wear felon stripes, Continued for defendant. LARCENY The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guiltyza of larceny of an Automobile for temporary use. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the de- fendant be released on condition that he leave the County within fifteen days, if he is found in County after fifteen days capias to issue, SEDUCTION Continued under former order. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning May 20, 1926 at 9:30 A. M MAY TERM, 1926 TUESDAY MAY 18, 1926. REPORT OF GRAND JURY May Term, 1926 To the Superior Court, Begknning May 17 Iredell County, 1 O O'clock A. M, Judge T. D. Bryson, Rresiding. We, the Grand Jury for iday Term of Iredell County Superiop Court, 1926, beg leave to submit the following report: We have passed all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made retupns of same to Court. We visited the County Home by a committee of five and there we find forty@three inmates as follows: 20 white females; 10 white males; 5 colored females; and 8 colored males, We find in the insane department: 2 white women. They have 2 convicts; 2 mules; 29 hogsgel4 milk cows; and 1 Fordson Tractor. Committee talk- ed with several inmates and they all reported that their keeper, Mr, and Mrs Perry treeted them kindly, that they had plenty of nourishing food, was well prepared and served to them. We find the Home neatly kept, showing that the keeper was taking interest in the Home and premises, COURT HOUSE Inspection made by committee of seven. We find all the offices are neatly kept and records carefully filed for the conven- lence of those wanting to refer to same. We recommend that the County Commissioners have Benton & Benton, or some other reputable architect figure the cosb of excavating the basement of the Court House, whepe- by making additional room as we find the present offices have not suffivient room to keep their records and carry of the County's af- fai ms 88 shold be. Upon getting the cost of this work, we recommend that th ° is contract be let and work completed at earliest date possible. JAIL Inspection made by committee of Seven. Visited the jail and find ten pri : ° prisoners: 5 whites; 5 Colored; all males, They report the treat- ment recej ved there very Satisfactory. we make the following recommend- that the County buy twelve hanging hammocks for beds, not to cost over $2.00n @ach, Picks and other tools that are being and 23 cots. We ommend that he be brought back to jail whepe from a Phisician until he is able shovels, used in the work, 2 guards, to have the find one man sick and rec= No. 185 State vs Jess Tuck No. 186 State vs Walter Houpe No. 191 State va John Leonard altas John Riicker No, 192 State vs Clay Holland No, 182 State vs Franklin C De Pope No. 146 State vs Clarenge Eller tll he SN Se Oe no MAY TERM, 1926 Tuesday May 18, 1926. STOREBREAKING AND LARCENY. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of eae and larceny as charged in the bill of indict- mente It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that on the charge for larceny the defendant be imprisoned in the com- mon jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO YEARS, and assighed to work on public roads of said County for said period. On the charge for sStorebreaking prayer for judgment continued. MANSLAUGHTER The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of manslaughter as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defend- entibe inprisoned in the Common Jail of Iredell County for a term of not less than THREE nor more than FIVE YEARS, and assigned to work on public roads of said county for said peridad. ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsels D L Raymer and P P Dulin pleads not guilty of assult with dead- ly weapon as charged in the bill of indictment. The Court after hearing all the States evidence finds that the defendant is not guilty of Assult with deadly weapon, SECRET ASSULT. Bhe defendant comes ito open Court and pleads not guilty of Secret assult as charged in the bill of Indictment, Jury No. 2 after being sworn and empannelled for their ver- dict returned a verdict of guilty. Mt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the State Penitentiary for a period of not less than FOUR NOR MORE THAN SIX YEARS at hard labor to wear felon stripes. Continued for defendant. LARCENY The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guiltyze of larceny of an Automobile for temporary use. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the de- fendant be released on condition that he leave the County within fifteen days, if he is found in County after fifteen days capias to issue, SEDUCTION Continued under former order. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning May 20, 1926 at 9:30 A. M. co ee attest ceern tee Re ee MAY TERM 1926 THURSDAY MAY © 1926 Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, at 9:30 O'clock Ay Thursday May 20 1926, A.D., for the dispatch of business, Tee Rk ee a ie eee Apra Sharpe vs Rufus Sharpe - Continued Jenkins Hdwr. Co vs Stearns Brothers,-Foster and Cockie and State Highway Commission - Continued Morrison Mifg Co - vs Rosenbloon - Levy Company - Continued C B Ludwig vs Charles Miller - Continued P P Dulin Receiver of Carolina Stone Company vs Stearns Bros Inc. Continued by consent Clarence wavhew vs R ii Washam - Continued L C Atwell vs Southern Railway Company et alg - Continued N P Seay admr of James Wright vs L P Henke} et al, Executors of C V Henkel - Continued by consent No 278 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County James Robert Brown, Jr by his next friend, vs Plaintirr JUDGMENT Carter-Colton Civar Co, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge of the Super’or Court and it appearing to the Court that the things and mat- ters at issue and it controversy between the Parties have been duly settled by an agreement whereby the defendant Consentsthat judgment mav be rendered against it in the sum of two hundred fifty dollars, and the plaintiff has agr cce greed to accept said judgment 2n;. fui) settlement of any and all claims of every nat ’ ature and character which he mav have against the defendant by. sbkaul of the to the manner in gation finds, as 4 fact, that the settlement above mentioned 4 and hereby approves same, 8 for the best interest of said minor MAY TERM 1926 THURSDAY MAY 20 1926, Now, therefore, it is hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Two hundred and fifty dollars, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, Tis the 19th day of April, 1926. T D Bryson, “udge Presiding. We Consent: John A Scott, atty for plaintiff John M Roberson, atty for defendant. tities North Carolina in the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk James Robert Brown, Jr by his 9 next friné, plaintiff ) vs PHTITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF NEXT FRIEND Carter Colton Cigar Company Defendant The undersigned respectfully shows to the Court that James Robert Brown, Jr, is an infant, without general or testamentary guardian; and that he has a good cause of action against the Garter ColtonCigar Company for injuries received on account of the negligence of the latter, Wherefore, the undersigned makesapplication that he be apvointed as next frient of the said James Robert Brown, Jr. to prosecute said action, This the 23rd day of April, 1626. J R Brown ORDER Upon the foregoing application the said J R Brown is hereby ap- pobmted to act as next frient of the said James Robert Brown, Jr. in the Prosecution of his action against Carter Colton Cigar Company. This the 23rd day of April 1926. J A Hartness. Clerk North Carolina: IN THE SUPEIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY: No 279 * aerPison Compton, individually, nd Harrison Compton, Next Friend of Robert Compton or Ft ac ! 6 4 ) T vs yi 88h, individually, ana Sack 140 8sh appearing herein by his SYardian ad litem T A Nash ne ac mariner pierre ee otis MAY TERM 1926 THURSDAY MAY 20 1926 This cause coming on to be heard before Hon T D Bryson, Presiding Judge at the May term 1926 of the Superior Court and it appearing to the Court that the action is instituted by the plaintiff, Harrison Compton, individually and as next friend of his son, Kobert Compton, for loss of services to the plain. tiff and for damages to Robert Compton alleged to have been sustained throngh personal injuries to Robert Compton as the result of being struck by an auto. mobile on the Statesville-Charlotte hard-surfacead Highway near the twon of Ostwalt on the night of October 22, 1925, driven by Jack Nash, a minor re- presented in this action by his Guardian ad litem, T A Nash, and for the further recovery of the hospital bill of $970.71 to the Davis Hospital of Statesille, “orth Carolina, for the treatment and care of Robert Compton, And it further appearing that the defendants have denied the &llega- tions of negligence set out in the complaint but have offered to compromise all matters and things at issue and in controversy by the payment of the hospital bill and that the plaintiff have agrees to accept said compromise and settlement subject to the Sanction and approval of the Court after in- vestigation; And the Court, after an investigation of the facts in reference to the nature, character and extent of the injuries and also in peference to the manner in which the said injury was Sustained, being of the opinion that the accident was not due to the negligente of the defendant, Jack Nash, but that it was unavoidable on account of the fact that the Plaintiff, Robert Compton suddenly stepped in front of the approaching automobile, the Court, therefore finds as a fact that the settlement above referred to is for the best interest of the said mino> and hereby approves the same: r * 3 And it further appearing to the Court that the defendant now offers payment of $970.71 ana with the consent of the Court has Paid s id amount over to the Davis ~Ospital, it is, therefore, orderedand adjudged that the Plaintiff or either of them take nothing more by this action but the amount or pase Dy the defendants, 1s hereby adjudged a full and complete release and discharge of the defendants and each of them from any and all claims of the plain T D Bryson, “udge Presiding John A Scott, Atty for Plaintiff, Harrison Compton ison Compton, next friend Of Robert Compton EM Land, At torney for defendants > MAY TERM 1926 THURSDAY MAY 20 1926 NORTH CAROLINA: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT No 281 H A Sloop os IS UES MH McKnight « G G McKnight, Admrs et al 1. Did G L McKnight contract and agree to sell to H A Sloop, on the 24th day of November, 1913, the land and p emiseses embraced in the calis set forth in the first paragraph of the complaint, and was such contract sonsummated by the payment to G L McKnight by H aA Sloop of the purchase price thereof, to-wit: one thousand dollars? Answer: Yes 2. Were the calls inserted in the deed from G L McKnight and wife to 8 A Sloop on the 24th day of November 1915, and recorded in book 50 page ee, recurds of Iredell County, North Carolina, inserted therein by inad- vertence and mutual mistake in lieu of the calls of the tract of land actually intended to be conveyed. Answer: Yes, North Carolina: In the Sfperior Court Iredell County; May term 1926 No 232 Emma Young vs H F Moore & Carl Beaver Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff and if so in what amount. Answer, No damage. theeitit NORTH CAROLINA: May Term 1926 IREDELL COUNTY: John Morrison Q Vs ' Laura Morrison t 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the Complaint? ? Answer, Yess, aeteeeacnutanmeeen ee ee eee : | / ; , F : ees MAY TERM 1926 THURSDAY MAY 20 1926 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes 5. Did the defendant, ALaura Morrison, commit adultery with one, Quick, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 4. Has the plaintiff lived with the defendant in the con jugal relation since he discovered her adultery, Answer: Yes NORTH CAKLINA: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IRED“LL COUNTY: MAY TERM 1926 John Morrison Vs } JUDGH ENT 4+aura ilorrison THIS cause coming on to be heard at this ter of the Superior Court before his Honor T p Bryson, “Yudge and a jury and the jury having a nswered the issues as set out in the record in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between th granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with the Gefendant May 20 1926, T D Bryson, “udge Presiding, . 7) O8clock, A. MU, May 20, 1926, A. p MAY TERM 1926 THBERDAY MAY 28 1926 This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment at 9:30 ofa Tiutdespeyax May 21.1926, for the dispatch of business. oe North Carolina: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDiLL COUNTY: BEFORE THE CLERK HarrisonCompton and Robert Compton, a “inor ) eo APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT oF ) T A Nash and “ack Nash, a NEXT FRIEND minor To the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County: John A Scott, atty. respectfully showeth to the Court: y That Robert Compton is a minor about 14 vears of age and is without testamentary or general guardian, 2. That the above action is instituted by Harrison Compton and Robert Compton against the defendants for the recovery of the damages against the defendants Browhng out of the injuries sustained by Robert Compton in being struck by an automobile operated by Jack Nash with the consent of his father TA Nash, the owner of said new Car, and that it is necessary that some capable, discreet and competent person be appointed as next friend to re- present the said minor in said action. Wherefore, the undersigned prays that some capable, discreet, and com- petent person beappointed as next friend to represent Robert Compton in said action. This the 7th day of May, 1926, John A Scotte NORTH CAROLINA: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY: BEFORE THE CLERK Harrison Compton and Robert Compton, ) a minor, ) vs APPOINTMENT OF NEXT FRIEND T A Nash and Jack Nash, a Idinor This cause coming on to be heard upon the application of “ohn A Scott attv, for the appointment of the next friend of Robert Compton, a minorabout 14 years of age andappearing to the Court that the action is instututed agaim the defendants for the recovery of the damages for injuries sustain*dby Kober Compton from being struck by an automobile operated bythe defendant, Jack Nah with the consent of his father, T A Nash, the defendant, owner of the said “utomobile and that the said Robert Compton is a necessary party to this action: MAY TERM 1926 PRYDAYAYT MAY QM 1926 And it further appe ring that HarrisonCompton is a capable, discreet and competent person to represent said minor in this action; It is now ordered and adjudged that Harrison Compton be, and he igs hereby apvointed as Next Friend of said minor to represent him in this action and that he be, and igs hereby empowered to join in this action asNext Friend of said minor, This the 7th day of lay 1926, “ A Hartness, Clerk Superior Court, it hereby accept bhe appointment of Next Friend of Robert Compton vromise to faithfully represent and protect his interest in this action, This the 7th dav of May 1926. Harrison Compton, NORTH CAO LINA;: Ili THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY: BEFORE THE CLERK Harri sonCompton and Robert Compton a minor ) vs ) APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF T A Nash and Jack Nash a minor ) GUARDIAN AD LITEM ia) aoe — —o : ' TO THE CLERK OF THE SUPE ‘LOR COURT: BE. M. Land, respectfully showeth to the Court: ole That Jack Nash is a minor about 18 years Of age and is without tes- tamentary or general Suardian, ~2Q- That the above action igs instituted by Harrison Compton. and Robert Compton against the defendants for the recovery of the damages against the defendants Browing out of the injurie S Sustained by Robert Compton in being ‘erated by Jack Nash T. A Nash, the Owner of the said ne t } 5 stnuck byan automobile ° with the consent of his fahter, w Car, and that it is further necessary that some Capable, discreet and competent per Son beapnointed as Buardian ad litem to represent the Said minor in said a Ction, “herefore, the undersigned prays tha in said action, This the 7th day of May 1926 MAY TERM L("_ 1926 y~ FRIDAY. MAY 2071926 NORTH CAROLINA: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDSLL COUNTY: BEFORE THE CLERK Harrison Compton and Kobert Compton, a Minor ) VS ) APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD T A Nash and Jack Nash, a minor re This cause co ing on to be heard upon the application of E “ Landa for theapvointment of the Guardian ad litem of Jack Nash, a minor about 18 years of age, and appearing to the Court that the action is instituted against the defendants for the recovery of the damage for injurise sustained by Robert Compton from being struck by an automobile operated by the de- fendant, Jack Nash, with the consent of his father, T A Nash, the defendant owner of said automobile, and it further appearing that T A Nash is a capable, discreet and competent person to represent said minor in this action: It is now ordred and adjudged that T A Nash be, and he is hereby appointed Guardian ad litem for said minor, to represent him in this action this the 7th day of Mav 1926. “ A Hattness, Clerk Superior Court I hereby accept above appointment. T A Nash, North Carolina; In the Superior Court Tredell County; May Term 1926 James w Brown Plaintirr vs ISSUES TO Teague, Defendant 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant enter into the *ontract as alleged in the complai nt$? Answer: Yes 2. Was there a breach thereof on the mrt of the defendant as alleged? Answer, Yes 5. In what sum, if any, ts the defendant indebted to the plaintif Answer: $347.68 on MAY TERM 1926 Honorable Court Takes a recess fintil Saturday Morning kk Me May 22, 1926, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment at 9:50 22, 1926 for the d&&patch of business, In the Superior Court, May Term, 1926 4- rh } ann . T 7 vo be heard before His Honor T D Bryson Judge and Jury, : this term of the Court 1% j n of t rt, and the jury for their verdict, having answered t} Sted to t] ve to them in favor of the plaintiff, as set out in the record, It is there one@i } erefore, c neicered, ordered and adjudged that the plain- tiff vu W brown recove de e T A . } 3 x of the Q of sndar , ) Tearue t he ~ red and Fort Seven D are and er , y Dollars and Sixty eight Cents, with interest from May EY, 2906 ental sstd. aur > , paid, and the cost of this action attached by Clerk d ~e W Brow m I J W Brown VS T O Teapue--.- Defendant move 5 ant n 8S to gs verdi id . et verdict aside. Motion Overruled. Exception. elendan in ne Y £ | t Open Court Gives notice of appeal to Supreme Cpu 5 bond of $50 ad judced sufficient ene ene ee a, Defendant allowed 40 days to file éand Ppeai. Plaintiff sz becca ‘ it allowed 40 Gays thereafter to fil exceptions, © counter case or This Honorable Court takes a rec 9:30n O'clock A. M. May 24 1926 arr ae v 2 MAY TERM 1926 Monday, May 24 1926. This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment for the dispatch of business. on Monday Morning, May 24 1926 at 9350 A M, orth Carolina N In the Superior Court Iredell County No 210 WwW Rankin Company ) Vs ) JUDGMENT Lillie Poston Newton ) This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor Judge T D Bryson, and a jury, and it apvearing to the Court that the plainti f desires to take a voluntary non suit as to the cause of action for $54.25, which cause of action was based on the eouount of J W Newton. It sarther appearing that Lillie Poston Newton consents to a judgment being taken against her on the other cause of action for $85.15 with interest on the same from September 50 1922, and the cost of this action. It is therefore orderedand decreed that the cause of action for $54.25 based on the account of J W Newton be and the same is hereby non suited, It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Lillie Poston Newton the sum of $85.15 with interest from S,ptember 30 1922 at the rate of Six per cent per annum until paid and that the cost of this action be taxed by the Clerk against Lillie Poston Newton, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding. BX whe No 250 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Graham R Shaver Vs JUDGMENT Tri-State Transportation Company ) This cause coming on for hearing, and having been heard before the undersigned Judge Prasiding, and it appearing to the Court that the Parties have agreed upon a compromise 6f the matters and things alleged herein, Now, therefore, by consent, it is orderedand decreed that the Pla ntiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Twenty-three Hundred ($xxx ($2300) Dollars in full compromise and settlement of the claims and cuases of acti alleged herein, and that the defendant Pay the cost of this action. Consent, Grier & Grier Attys for Plaintiff 7D Begpgite . Judce Preeiding MAY TERM 1926 Monday, May 24 1926, MAY TERM 1926 This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment for the dispatch of business. on Monday Morning, May 24 1926 at 9;30 A M, en ele In the Superior Court U his Honorable Court Takes a recess fintil Saturday Morning mm rt t at [3:30 O'clock A. li. May 22, 1926. Iredell County No 210 WwW Rankin Company ) Vs ) JUDGMENT Lillie Poston Newton ) This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment at 9:30 ; : ee . This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before saturday May 22, 1926 for the d&apatch of business, v His Honor Judge T D Bryson, and a jury, and it aprearing to the Court a a ee ; inti f desires to take a voluntary non suit as to the cause North Carolina In the Superior Court, Oe einer demmeanr a emaeseaions - 5, Which cause of action was based on the eouount of Iredell County, May Term, 1926 of action for $54.25, J W Newton. J W Brown It sarther appearing that Lillie Poston Newton consents to ” cUDGMEN a judgment being taken against her on the other cause of action for lO Yeague $85.15 with interest on the same from September 30 1922, and the cost eerie ee ee of this action. 41S Vause coming off to be heard before His Honor T D Bryson It is therefore orderedand decreed that the cause of action Judge and Jury, dine cima iii. . Court, and the jury for their verdict, for $54.25 based on the account of J W Newton be and the same is hereby having answered t] iss submitted + ham in } E “ented to them in favor of the plaintiff, as non suited. set out in the record, : . It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover It is therefo on@idereac asec 4 ; = therefore, c néicered, ordered and adjudged that the plain- of the defendant, Lillie Poston Newton the sum of $85.15 with interest tiff J W Brown recov > th lefend m 7m . ’ er of the defendant 1 O Teague, the sum of Three Hunde from S,ptember 30 1922 at the rate of Six per cent per annum until paid red and Fort Seven Dollars ang Oferta ot 2g ‘ a lars and Sixt; C*eht Cents, with interest from May and that the cost of this action be taxed by the Clerk against Lillie 17, 1926 until paid, and the cost of + bhis action ettached by Clerk, Poston Newton, 1D Bryson T D Bryson, Judge Presiding. Judge Presiding. ; Qw~wo J W Brown vs O 7 E W s 7 Learuewn-.— No 250 Defendant moves to sg verdi id a : Soa set verdict aside. Motion overruled, Exception. Cc ae Defendant in open Court gives notice of appe Iredei 1 County al to Supreme Cpurt. Appeal bond of $50 adjudced surrsn; . ad jud sufficient Defend e De tant allowed z lays t i : On appeal. Plaintir Ld d “tae ae — een Ba : , eee aiiowed 40 days thereaft ; vs “iter to file counter exceptions, ee Ss = SaRee Tri-State Transportation Company ) This cause coming on for hearing, and having been heard before This Honorable Court tekes a re | the undersigned Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the 9:30n O'clock A. M, ; Cess Linthl Monday Morning at May 24, 1926, Parties have agreed upon a compromise 6f the matters and things alleged herein, Now, therefore, by consent, it is orderedand decreed that the for the 1 ng a ng Courts © ith Jddicial District. pla ntiff have and recover of the defendant the sum of Twenty-three Hundred ($xxx ($2300) Dollars in full compromise and settlement of the claims and cuases of actim alleged herein, and that the defendant Pay the cost of this action. Consent, Grier & Grier _@D Bryson, Judge Presiding , Attys for Plaintiff Ge ecsieuien ee Meee rer® “tty for defendant. _ uu ER reer te nen a ee Se anti ile es Dee mosinie-riapuamsintiaedh entasoiniinmeri-es “ | | MAY TERM 1926 MONDAY MAY 24 1926 No 232 North Candlina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: May Term 1926 Fmma Young Vs JUDGMENT N F Moore and Carl Beaver This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court of fredell County, and being heard before Hig Honor, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, and A Jury, and the jury having answered the issue submitted to them by the Court in favor of the defendants and against the plainti88s as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Dlaintiff, tama Youngrecover nothing of the defendants, H F Moore and Carl seaver, and that said plaintiff pay the cost of this action to the Clerk of this Court ® D Bryson, Judge Presiding No 281 NORTH CAROLIT A N THE SUPERIOR OCOURT TREDELL COUNTY H A SLOOP VS MH McKnight and GG McKnijht, Administrators of G L McKnight, deceased, lirs Pearl H McKnight, M H McKnight, GG McKnight, Martha JUDGMENT McKnight and James Mc*night, Mary : McSnight, Elizabeth McKnight, Ruth McKnight ana George Lock McKnight, minors by theip uardian NM Pearl H Mc“night, oe This cause coming on to be heard and bet ng heard at this term of Court, before His Honor, T p Sryson, Yudge presiding and a jury and being heardand the jury having answered the issues as set ort in the records Tt is therefore considered, adjudged ana decreed that 4 A Sloop is the owner of and entitled to the possession of the following lot of land situated in the Town of Mooresville, N, Gs; Iredell County and described as fo V3, to- : a llows, to-wit: Beginning at an iron pin at the corner of Maple St and Alley;thence with Maple Street 73 feet to corner of Lot # 10 in Block 2; thence with line of Lot 10 in Said Blcock 19 Lot # 10 at edge of Alley; 5 feet to corner of thence with Said Alley 73 feet to the corner of two Alleys; thence 195 feet to the be sinning 9 Containing 14,235 s uare feet, more or less, ; , MAY TERM 1926 May 24 1926, (Monday) defendants. It is further considered, adjudged and decreedthat 4 A Sloop be and he is hereby divested of all right, title and interest in and into the following tract of land, to-wit: Beginning at an iron pin at the southern edge of First Street and corner of Lot # 3 in block 7 on Kastern Heizhts in the Town of Mooresvilie, N.C;; thence 20): feet with aine of Lot # 3 to an iron Pin, corner of “ot # 3 in Alley; thence with Alley 100 feet to an iron pin, corner of “ot # 6; thence 200 feet with edge of First Street 100 feet to the bexinning, being Lots 4& 5 in Blcik 7 of the Eastern Heights, Mooresville, Ni, c, It is further considered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay thecost of this action to be taxed by the Clekk of the Court. T D Bryson, Judge Presiding. State of North Carolina In the Superior Court County of Iredell May Term 1926 Scelestia Billingsley et al ) vs ) 4.3828:-0:8-3 City of Statesville ) Are the plaintiffs all of the heirs at law and next of kin of the residuary legateesnnamed in the will of Amos S Billingsley, as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes State OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL MAY TERM 1926 Celestia Billingsley et al us JUDGMENT The City of Statesville aca onsale eee te en ee MAY TERM 1926 MONDAY MAY 24 1926, This cause coming on to be heard before “ig Honor T D Brysin, Judge Presiding of the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, and being heard, and it apnearing to the Court that the jury has answered the issues submitted to it as follows: 1. Are the pld ntiffs all of the heirs at law and next of kin of the residuary lezatees named in the will of Amos $ Billingsley, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes, It, is, therefore, bv consent of Quinn, Hamrick & Harris, at torneys for the plaintiff, and Grier & Urior, attorneys for the defendant, ordered, 4 wigel and decreed that - 2” pert vqdes Cm in the complaint be sub- and (ten sth wth at RW Rahat tes Ke “Tn geulad vided and sold to the sed be bidder or eee n’the property in the City of Statesville after first advertising the same for thirty davs immediately preceeding said sale, upon the following terms, to-wit: One third cash on day of sale, the remaind-r to be due and pay ble one third in six months and one thira in twelve months; the deferred payments to be evidencec by notes with approved security. It is further ordered, adjudgedand decreed, by consent of the parties » that the defendant receive one-half of the purchase price of said property lessthe court cost and expenses of the sale, and uvon receipt of same that the defendant will surrender to the plaintiffs all its right, title and tere n and to said pp . will] interest in ar ¥O Said property, and will forever release and quit claim any interest, claims or man to 3: , ns or demands to said property, or anv of the remaining proceeds thereof, t 49 furth fd cea tt 1s further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the other remaining 1e f f » aan ~ one half of the proceads derivedfrom the sale of said property less the e t 7 or nr costs of this suit and costs of sale shall be divided among the plaintiffs } as their relative int -erestappear from the Pleadings filed in this cause. It is further y a 8 irther ordered, adjudged and decreed that YL Gbtee sane eee D Hamrick be and the: and they are hereby apnointed commissioners to make the sale of the said Property and ¢ “ and to make, execute and deliver @ eds to the purchaser or purchasers of same, It is furt} urther ordered, ad judged and decreed that said commissioners shall ha ve she ri ght and p 01 { 2 “* ad x 3m necessary and 8; pedient to . “ , employ e> xpert real estate men to aid them in subdividing and selli aid ng 8 property t Y, and that a reasonable allowance, in case they deem it wise and 3) wis expedient to nloy eomloy sata real estate men, shall be made from the proceeds of said sale in Payment of their services MAY TERM 1926 MONDAY MAY 24 1926 It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the City of Statesville shall have the right and power to purchase any part or parts of said property atsaid sale, free and discharged from any of the charitable trusts and uses mentioned in the pleadings filed in this CaUusé. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreedthat said commissioners shall within 10 davs after said sale report said sale to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County for other and further proceedings in this casue. 1-0 sor gee Judge holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial district of orth Carolina. By Consent; Quinn, Hamrick & Harris, Attys for plaintisss; Grier® Grier attorneys for defendant. Pkie-Henerabie-Cours This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, Way 25th, 1926, at 9:30 A.M.. & . Fifteenth Judicfal District of North Carolina, MAY TERM, 1926 SECOND WEEK Tuesday May 25, 1926. This Honorable Court convened ac:ordihg to adjournment at 9330 A. M. Tuesday May 25, 1926, WhentandcwherecHis{HonernfsD.Bryson, Judge Pre. siding and Holding Courts of the 15th Judicial District of North Garolina is present and presiding, this the second week for Civil cases at May Term, 1926, M. P. Alexander High Sheriff of Iredell County, Notrh Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawf#l men to serve as Jurors of this Court for Second week for civil cases, to-wit: RH E Goodin, J EB Smith, J R Joyner, F E Brown, Henry D Harris, J Gilmer Sherrill, S L Cushing, J S$ Connelly, EH Critz, RC Foster, R L Sloan, S A Hair, ED Fox, ¥ & Lambert, C W Loftin, J A Motley, I W Coyle, R L Gatton, 2 V Alexander and &% R Bell. The following were excused on lawful causes; J ¥& Brown, and Ollie Kimmons,. The following were returned not to be found, R M Sloop and S B Goodin, North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } May Term, 1926, Dorothy Gill vs OH Hester 2 9% re a Jas she Plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defend- ant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes/ 2. That at damage, if any, is plaintire entitled to recover? Answer: $1,000.00 North Caroli Olina, $ In the Superipr Court, Iredell County, ( May Term, 1926 2 e Dorothy Gill vs JTUDGMEN®, OH Hester MAY @ERM, 1926 SECOUND WEEK, Tuesday May 25, 1926, This cause coming on to be heard at thhe May Term, 1926, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, 7 p Bryson, Judge presiding, and the jury, and the jury having answered the issues submit- ted to it as follows, to-wit: pee Mee fe Piaineitr injured by the negligence of the defend- ant, as alleged in the complaint? : Answer: Yes. 2. What damage, if any, is the Plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $1,000.00" It is therefore, ordered, considered,and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $1,000.00, with interest from May 20, 1926, until paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, T. D. Bryson Budge Presiding. Dorothy Gill vs 0. H. Hester. Defendant moves to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Overruled. Defendant excepts. Judgment signed. Defendant excepts and gives notice of appeal in open Court to the Supereme,Court. Further notice waived. Appeal bond in the sum of $100 adjudged sufficient. By consent, defendant allowed 45 days to make up and serve case on appeal, and plaintiff 45 days thereafter to serve counter case or file exceptions, North Carolina, § In the Spperior Court, Tredel, County. § May Term, 1926, IN RE: WILL- John E. Burton. Loe es Is the paper writing propounded by T S White, the Executor there- in the last will and testatment of John E Burton and evrey part thereof? Answer: Yes, MAY TERM, 1926 Tuesday May 25, 1926. North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, Iredell County, | May Term, 1926, IN RE: WILL = John KE. Burton, THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before His Honor, T D Bryson,and Judge and a jury, at this term of the Court, and the Jury having answered the issue submitted to them in favor of the Will as set out in the record, IT IS THEREFORE considered, ordered and adjudged, that the Paper writing propounded by T S White, the Executor therein, and everyypart there- of, is the last will and testament of John# Burton, it is further edjudedd that the cost of this proceeding be taxed against the Estate of said John E. Burton. It is further considered ordered and adjudged by consent of all partieg, that Nan Burton, the Caveator recover of T S White, Executor of John E. Burton the sum of Two Hundred Dollars, and that when paid by him the same shall be a valid voucher in the settlement of said Estate. It is further con- sidered, ordered and adjudged that T S White the executor named in said will is entitled to Letters Testamantary on the estate of the said John E Burton, and that Chas M Summers who was appointed administrator during the pendency of the above litigation will deliver over to T § White, Executor aforesaid, all the assets belonging to said Estate including cash collected by hin, notes, accounts, and other evidence of indebtedness and all property that came into his hands as collector or administrator aforesaid, T. D. Bryson Judge Presiding. This Honorabie Court takes 4 recess until May 26, 1926, at 9:30, A. M. Wednesday Morning, nz an for 15th Judicial District. MAY ETRM, 1926. Wednesday May 26, 1926, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment at 9:30 A. Me. Mesinesday May 26, 1926 for the dispatch of business, North Carolina, {| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } May Term, 1926, Henkel-Craig Livestock Co. vs G B Crowell and Ethel Crowell lL. Are the defendants indebted to the Plaintiff as alleged in its complaints i? so in what amount? ANSWER: Yes $471.22 with interets on $440.40 from May 17, 1926, 2. Is said indebtedness a specific lien on the property des- cribed in the complaint, by virture of a chattal mortgage, executed thereon? ANSWER: Yes, North Carolina, jj In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 May Term, 1926, Henkel-Craig Livestock Co. ' vs 4 &UDGMES NO. G E Crowell and Ethel C Crowell t This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N. C. before His Honor, T D Bryson, Judge and a Jury, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issued sub- mitted to them, in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record, It is therefore considered ordered, and adjudged that Henkel- Craig Live Stock Company, the plaintiff recover of the defendants G E Crowell and Ethel c Crowell, the sum of FOUR Hundred and Seventy One Dollabs and Twentycfwoscgents, with interest of Four hundered and forty Dollars ahd forty cents from the 17th day of May, 1926 until paid and the cost of action, It is further, adjudged that the foregoing judgment is a Specific lien on the following property, to-wit, one light bay mare mule, six years old, weighing about 1050 1bs, also one light bay mare mule, six years old weighing about 1100 lbs., one bay homee mule about WAY TERM, 1926. ' Wednesday May 26, 1926, ten years old, named Jim, and weighing about 1250 lbs., also the entire crop of cotton, wheat and corn of the defendants, that he raised or caused to be raised in thw year of 1925, on his own land in Big Lick Township, Stanley County, and that said lien dates from registration of the Mortgage thereon, in Stanley County from the 19th day of March, 1925 Book 86, page 382, i Judge Presiding. ~-=99-~~ North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } May “erm, 1926, P C Jurney vs Stearns Brothers, Inc, 1. Was the plaintirr injured in Property by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the ComplaintH Answer: Yes *. Vhat damage, if any, is Plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: $300.00 5. Was the defendant injured in property by the neglence of the Plaintiff, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No 4. ¥ Vhat Gamage, if any, is defendant entitled to recover of Plaintiff? Answer: May 27, 1926, at 9:30 A, M MAY TERM, 1926, Thursday May 27, 1926, ¥ This Honorabhe Court converled according to adjournment at 9:30 A. M. Thursday May 27, 1926 for the dispatch of business, North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4} May Term, 1926, Pc Jurney vs JUDGMENT, Stearns Bros. Inc. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, T D Bryson, Judge Presiding, and a jury and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as set out in the record: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Three Hindred and no/100 Dollars ($300.00), and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, T. D. Bryson Judge Presiding. North Caré@lina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 9 MayeTerm, t2O@26i eric, Lewis & Lewis vs TB8U8 S DL Foil and Mrs J H Kennedy, k. Are the d fendants indebted to the plaintiffs, and if so in what amount? Answer: $250.00 with interest from date of execution of note June 25, 1925. North Carolina,®@ In the Superior 60 urt Tredell County.9 May Term, 1926. J @ Lewis and H E Lewis, trading and doing business under the firm name of Lewis & Lewis, vs JUDGMENT. DL Potl and Mrs J H Kennedy. WAY fiRM,: 1926. Thursday May 27, 1926. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superiop Court of Iredell County and being heard before His Honor, T D Bryson, Juang presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issue submitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants ag set out in the records It is therefore ordered and adgudged by the Court that the pt plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of $250.00, together with interest thereon from the 25th day of June, 1925, until paid and that said defendants pay the costs of thia action to be taxed by tye Clerk of this Court. T D Bryson Judge Presiding. ~<-~9Q--- N th Caroling ; fal North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell Ce@mt} : C Wintye Mey term, 1926. Raleigh Carson vs Agnes Carson First: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes Second: Have the gtaintiff and defendant live separate and apart for mor } ‘ 28 e than five successive years prior to the commencement of this action as all “ r eged in the complaint, and was separaved without fault of the plaintiff as alleged in the comphaint? Answer: Yeg Third: Ha v + vs s the plaintiff been a bone fide resident of North Carolina more than five year é $8 prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes + oF North Carolina » In the Superior Court Iredell County. } May T fay Term, 1926, Raleigh Carson vs JUDGMENT, Agnes Carson, MAY BRM, 1926. GhimeddyyiMay 27, 1926. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the May Term = Supertor Court of Iredell Cpunty before His Honor T D Bryson, Judge presiding and & jury, and the jury having answered the fssues submitted to them as follows: First: Did plaintiff and defendant intermarry’ as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes Second: Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for more than five successive years prior to the commemcement of this action as alleged in the complaint and separated without fault of the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes Third: Has the plaintiff been a bona fide residient of the State of North Carolina for more than five vears prior to the commence-~ ment of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes WHEREFORE, it is ordered and adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between Raleigh Carson and Agnes Carson be and the same 4s hereby desolved; and that the said “sleigh Carson and Agnes Carson be and they are hereby wholey and abso- lutely divorced from each other and from the bonds of matrimony; further that the plaintiff pay the cést of this action. T. D. Bryson Judge Presiding. onaQ@Q-~-= Dorothy Gill vs OH Hester In this case it is ordered by the Court that Dr. Current, Dr. Lazenby, Dr. Holland, Dr. Long and Dr. Yount be and they are here- by allowed $5000 per day as expert witnesses in said case, said fees to be taxed as other costs. MAY TERM, 1926 Thursday May 27, 1926. R L Smith Extr. of MF Nesbit, § vs } W F Smith et al. § lst. Vas it the intent of the testator to bequeath a one-sixth of the: residue of his estate to the estate pf Robert Porter, deceased, as alleged in the complaint? Ans: Yes. end. Was it the intent of the testator to bequeath a oné~sixth of the residue of his estate to Jane Porter Bynum as alleged in the complaint? Ans: Yes, NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, TREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1926. R. L. Smith, Executor of We. F. Nesbit, vs. W. F. Smith, Et Al. In this case it is agreed by the parties in this action and their attorneys that the case shall be tried on the facts stated in the plain- t . + tiff's complaint; that that part of the complaint alleging the market value of the stock, or book value, be @liminated, [+ is further agreed that if the evi- dence be competent it is a fact that the stock dividends were declared out of the surplus and earmings of the Mooresvilb Cotton Mills, but the defendants se o T. Smith and others of the residuary legatees, object to the competency of a n uch evidence and make this admission Subject to His Honor's ruling on the com 8B . petency, reserving all rights thereunder, Objection overruled, Defendants, J. T. Smith and those answering with him ex . cept... The foregoing record, with the complain copy of M, F, Nesbit's will, t and answers, and and copy of Judge x, B. Clinets judgment, and the judgment of ¢ dg; his court with the exceptions thereto, shall constitute the case on appeal the def @éndant havi ng given noti i ; ce n open court; further ’ notice being waived, and an appeal bond being fixed in the sun of Fifty dollars. Tt. D. Bryson, Judge Presiding. NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR court, IREDELL COUNTY. MAY TERM, 1926. R. L. Smith, Executor of M. F. Nesbit, Dec'd, ) ) V8. : JUDGMENT. ) W. F. Smith, J. T. Smith and others. THIS CAUS# coming on to be heard before His Honor, T. D. Bryson Judge, and Jury, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record, The parties to this action, the same being for the interpre- tation of the will of M. F, Nesbit, deceased, having agreed that the case may be heard upon the facts as stated in the plaintiff's complaint as an agreed case, which agreement appears in the record, IT IS THEREFORE, considered, ordered, and adjudged upon the verdict of the jury, that M. F. Nexbit, the testator bequeathed a one- sixth of the residue of his estate, to the estate of Bobert Porter, deceased, as alleged in the complaint, and that said testator bequeathed & one-sixth of the residue of his estate to Jane Porter Bynum, as alleged in the complaint. That upon the facts agreed, as set forth in the complaint IT IS CONSIDKFRED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED, that the twenty shares of the Capital stock of the Mooresville Cotton Mills, bequeathed to Nannie Lee Kerr Nesbit in Item Ten of the will, is the property of the said Nannie Lee Kerr Nesbit and all stock dividends declared thereon, as set forth in the complaint; that the ten shares of the capital stock of the Moores- ville Cotton Mills, mentioned in Item eleven of said will and the stock dividend of said corporation as set forth in the complaint is the property of the heirs at law of the said Alice L. Nexbit Neikirk; that the ten shares of the stock of the Mooresville Cotton Mills bequeathed to Fred Nesbit Porter under the twelfth item of said will, and the stock dividends declared thereon as alleged in the complaint, is the property of the heirs at law of the said Fred Nesbit Porter, deceased, as set forth in the com- Plaint; that the ten shares of the capital stock of the Mooresville Cot- ton Mills, bequeathed to Barron P. Smith in the thirteenth item of said will, and the stock dividends issued thereon by said corporation is the Property of the said Barron P. Smith, as alleged in the complaint; that the ten shares of the capital stock of the Mooresville Cotton Mills be- (weathed to Lee Parker in item fourteenth of said will was revoked and said ten shares of stock by the codicil fo said will was bequeathed to P. R. Nesbit, and that the said F. &. Nesbit ie the ower of said stock and the stock dividends declared thereon, as set forth in the complaint. If IS FURTHER CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that R. L, Smith Executor of M. F. Nesbit, deceased, who holds the stock dividends aforesaig as Executor aforesaid shall cause the same to be transferred and delivered to the above named defendants according to their respective interests, ag herein above declared, were entitled to the origimal shares of stock and the stock dividends declared thereon. The cost of the action to be taxed against R. L. Smith, Exe- cutor of M. F. Nesbit, deceased, by the Clerk of this Court. T. D. Bryson, Judge Presiding, To the foregoing Judgment the defendants W. F. Smith and others except, and apveal from said judgment to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Notice of ape al waived in open court, bond in the sum of Fifty Dollars adjudged sufficient, and forty days by agreement allowed the appel- dant to make out his case on appeal, forty days thereafter allowed the de “Sieallhs Smith and others to file countercase, Bryson, Judge Presiding, aww QQ—... North Carolina, “he Supertor Court. Iredell County. Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville,N.C., L.L. Troutman and Christy Brothers, in be- half of themselves and all other creditors and Stockholders who maycome in and make themselves Plaintiffs in this action. vs § Cardlina [ron Vorks, Incorporated, To the Honorable Superior Count: The unders3 orated, Gompany + re; o mpany to cash, aggregating $2,118.23, that he has paid the preferred aggregating $724.52, for general distribution of Claims proven to date, leaving a balance in his hands a 91,593.71; that the cost of the pro- ceeding is to be Paid out of this fund and th \ at there should be an or- der for A L ; $250.00, made, MAY TERM, 1926 Thursday May 27, 1926, I further report that the amount of general claims proven is $10,552.75. I recommend that after the payment of the cost of this vroceed- ing and an allowance of $250.00 to a G Starr, Attorney, and commissionr of five per cent on collectioms and disbursements to the Receiver, that the balanve be pro rated among the following general creditors who have filed their claims, according to their respective tnterest: First National Bank of Mooresville, Nc, Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N.C. The Commercial National Bank of Sratesville, N. C. Mooresville Cottom Mills and the City of “ooresville Mooresville Telephone Company. IT accompany this report with my final account attached hereto, Respectfully submitted, Frank Grier - Receiver for Carolina Iron Works,Ine North Carolina, § In the Superior Court. Iredell County. § derchants * Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N.C., L.L. Troutman and Christy Brothers, in behalf of themselves and all other creditors and stockholders who may come in and make themselves plaintiff in this action. ACCOUNT OF RXVEIVER. vs Carébina Iron Works, Incorporated, Prank Brier, Receiver of Carolina Iron Works, Incorporated, in account with said estate, May 19, 1926, RECEIPTS Sale of plant a ee Cash on hands ° Amounts collected H M Johnson "So T N Hall 7.75 Cascade Mills 48.04 Mooresville Furniture Co. 7.69 Judgment collected : Total Receints $2, 118.23 CMT MAY TERM, 1926 Wednesday May 27, 1926. -— ee -— -——— DISBURSEMENTS, PREFERRED CLAIMS. Total Receinvts State and County taxes for 1924 $97.19 State and County Taxes 1925 78.48 Mooresville Graded School tax for 1924 44.74 Mooresville Graded School tax for 1925 32.70 Taxes due city of Mooresville for 1926 89.47 Taxes due City of Mooresville for 1925 65.40 Mooresville Furniture Co, rent of building 216.67 Mooreaville Enterprise, advertising 9.00 Statesville Baily, advertising 2.70 Iredell Insurance Company, Ing. Bond 25.00 Greensboro Daily News, advertising 2.80 Charlotte Observer, advertising 8.45 State of North Carolina Franchise Tax 38.17 WY R Hobbs, labor 53.75 WC Perry, auctioneer 10.00 Total Disbursements $724.52 $ 724,52 —— eT Balance on hands for distribution among general creditors - $1593.71 North Carolina, § In the Superior Court Iredell County. § Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville,N.C, L L Troutnen and Christy Brothers, in behalf of themselves and all other creditors and stockholders who may tome in and make them- selves plaintiff in this action, VS Carolina Iron Works Incorvorated, This cause Coming on to be heard upon the final report of Frank Grier, Receiver of Carolina Iron Works, Incorporated, and it appearing from said report that he has reduced all assets of the com t Ds 23° : gating $2,118.25; that he has vaig the preferred claims proven aggregating $724.52 » and that there remains in his hands for &eneral distribution the sum of $1,393.71, U 7. YI pon his recommendation, it is Considered, ordered and adjudged that h 1 © vay out of said funds the cost of this Proceeding and A. L. Starr, Att- e § orney, for his “ ’ services in this estate, the sum of $250.00, and retain for hime self as receiver t ive per cent On total collections and disbursements, and that he pay the bal ance to the Seneral credstorg on their proven Claims according to their respective tnterest, MAY TERM, 1926 Thtineday May 27, 1926. North Carolina, ® In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4} May term, 1926, Eugene Summers { va () YTSsveEs Lula Thomas Summers § lst. Has the plaintiff baen a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the commencenent of this action as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes. &. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes 5. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five years prior to the commencement of this action as ale leged in¥the complaint? ANS'JER: Yes North Varolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } May Term, 1926, Eugene Summers vs JUDGEHEENT Lula Thomas Summers This cauxe coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court, and being heard before His Honor T D Bryson, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issued submitted to them as follows: lst. Has the plaintiff been a boéni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the commencement of this ac- tion as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes 2nd. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? ANSWER: Yes 5rd. Have the plaintiff and defendamt lived separate and apart @ for more than five years prior bo the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes. It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matré@mony heretofore existong between the plaintiff, Eugene Summers and the defendant, Lula Thomas Summersbe, and the same are hereby dis- Solved and an absolute Givorce granted. It is further ordered by the Court “hat the plaintiff be taxed with the costs of this action by the Clerk of Gout T. D. Bryson : . Judge Scat eine Thth Judicial Dis- trict. 245- Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co. vs Gastonia Purniture Co, ~Continueg 259- Lottie B Alley ww Robert B Alley. = Continued, 261- A C McHargue vs J C Burgess. - Continued 265- R W Zeigler vs J F Combs Lela Combs and W P Carpenter, < Continued 267=- John M Privett vs S. G,. Sloan/ = Continued, 2£70- Joe Byers vs Sarah Byers. - Continued, 27l- G. and M. Service Station vs Fred Chambers, - Continued 276- Newton Roller Mills vs R A Sipes,. = Continued. e- L Ellis Hayes,Admr. of M L Campbell, vs Columbue Campbell. = Contimied 3- lfrs Louisa Haves vs Columbus Campbell. = Continued, 4- Mrechants and Farmers Bank Mooresville vs D A Beam and L A Beam/ 5- J H McElwee vs Hutton and Bourbonn&is Co. * Continued. 6- A J Keller and wife vs Charlie Hicks and wife. - Continued 12- Statesville Lumber Co. vs R L Church and G S Grant, +# Continued 15- Statesville Lumber Co. vs Kops Harris and Kd Nicholson, < Cont tnued/ 14- Jas C Davis,Director General of Rail way vs Cleveland Mfg. Co. Continued Jas C Davis,Director General of Railway vs Statesville Veneer Co. Continned/ L B Hollar vs Jessie Miller. = Continued, Mrs William Wallace vs American Express Co. - Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs L w Westmoreland. -« Continued, Statesville Lumber Co. vs NG Holmes, et al. ~ Continued, Statesville Lumber Co. vg Dorsett Fraley et al < Continued. 27= Statesville Lumber Co. vs N G Holmes et al. - Continued. 47- lirs MB Westmoreland vs J A Westmoreland, - Continued, 48- J A Westmoreland vs Mrs ME Westmoreland, - Continued, 54= Statesville Lumber Co. vs N G Holmes et al, - Continued. 6l=- Hillard Summers vg Gertrude Summers, < Continued, No. 66@ Bank of Stony Point vs D D Littlejohn et al. = Continued, No. 88 R L Dickens and Fannie Digkens vs J P Nicholson, - Continued, No. 113= J M Deaton vs Eugene Morriosn Oc Gl, « Continued, No. 136- C B Freeze vs Mrs Zohn L Lowe, No. 139- w - Continued, W McGowan vs Walter Beckham et al, - Continued, No. 143- Fannie Dicke ns and R L Dicke Continued, sa N S Souther and Pearl Sourther- No. T D Shuford vy W Sunt tiaen. 8 R Hart Mnd Summers and McAuley and Stearns Bros, Ine. No. 160= YC Moore vs DG Wilson, - Continued, No. 162- Hazel Cline Plerce vs Herman Pierce, « Continued No. 173~< Vallie Carter vs James Carter, « Continued, Mo. 180- Statesville Lumber Co. vs JT Cha Ppell and Alice Chappell. #Continue No. 184- “State Transportation Co vs Stearns Bros 6o. = Comhimiea, Inc and Globe Indemnit No. 198- As Alley vs JA Perry and Cea A Hartline, ~ Continued, j99- A S Alley vs C A Hartilne and J A “erry. - continued. 209- J B Colt CO. vs E Pruitt Hager, - Continued, Carl Mathis vs Cleo Mathis. - Continued, A W Dula vs North Carolina Optometric Society et al, Continued, tT N Brown vs R L Church. - Continued. John Stamps vs Sarah Stamps. - Continued, J H Shuford vs Murdock Chair Co, - Conttnued, G F Mills vs Mooresville Cotton Mills, Ing. - Continued, wM Orr vs T D Miller. In this case death of Defendant suggested, It is ordered that the Administrator or representative be made a party to the action. - Continued, 262- J C Brookshibe vs McQueen Foures and wife. - Continued, 264- R L Shuford vs Mrs MS Brawley, Admrx of R V Brawley, deceased. Continted,. 2674- ‘1 O W Lee vs R L Sherpe. - Continued. 268- Mary Alexander vs P P Dulin, Admr of R T Weatherman. Continued, . 277= Ida Head vs Paul Baker. - Continued, North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court. Iredell County. } Statesville O11 Co. 4§ vs JUDGMENT James Watts This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term 2926, and it appear- ing that all matters have been compromised and settlsad, : Is now ordered and adjudged, by consent, that this action be and is hereby dismissed, It is further ordered and adjudged, by consent, that the plaintiff and defendant each pay one-half of the Court Cost to be taxed by the Clerk and that each pay his own witnesses, T. D. Bryson Judge Presiding. ttorney for plaintirr, J. H, Burke Attorney for defendnat,. &. C@CE Gee eeLe@eu @ve@e. @C@@ eer nce ee ane creer ee ne MAY ETRM, 1926 Thursday May 27, 1926. a A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE BAR OF IREDELL COUNTY ¥ AT THE HAY TERM, 1926, SUPERIOR COURT, w WHEREAS, Ths Bar of Iredell County has learned with genuine regret that the Honorable T D Bryson, Judge of the Superior Court , now holding oup May Term, has decided to give up his position on the Superior Court Bench of Nobth Carolina, and has filed his resignation with the Governor to be effective July lst, 1926; and WHEREAS, The Bar‘of Iredell County wishes to make recognition of ¢ the faithful, affecient and honorable service rendered by Judge Bryson; NOW, THEREFOREZ Be it resolved by the Bar of Iredell County: lst. That we record our appreciation of Judge Bryson and his spleh- dtd services to the Bench and Bar of North Carolina. His personality, his learn. ing and his high character &s a man, have combined with his fine Judicial tem perament and fairness and impartiality as a presiding officer, to win for him in the effection of his cCom-patriots a plave of honor and esteem, end. That the Bar of Iredell County regrets that Jufige Bryson has found it necessary to give unm his place upon the Hench and wishes to express its appreciation for the fairness, ability and consideration with which he has presided over the May Term and which he has always displayed when holding Court in Iredell County. Srd That, in going back to private life, he car-ies with him the : best wishes of the members of the Iredellm County Bar, who join in hoping that of the ji to Judge Bryson, W. D. Turner, President —~ M Land, Sect. For the Bar Association. Hort Varolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Conbt, Charles Harper, Administrator of the estate of Lamar Harper, Deceased, ve JUDGMENT. American Petroleum Marketing Company a corporation and American Refining Company, a corporation, It appearing to the Court that the matters in controversy in the above entitled action for damages on account of the death of plaintiff's intestate as a result of alleged negligence on the part of the defendants, have been settled by and between the parties in a manner satisfactory to themselves, by the berms of which the defendants have paid to the plaintiff in full satisfaction of all claims and damages the sum of $250.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, which compromise and settlement is here- by sanctioned and approved by the court, IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, by consent of attorneys representing the plaintiff ahd defendants, that the above en- titled action be and the same is hereby dismissed and thatt the defendants be and they are hereby taxed with the costs of this action. This 5th day of May, 1926, —oiarkwaperior tome By Consent: Buren Jurne —Ketorney for plaintirr Banks ‘H MeBane _ attorney for defendants Q® 242@@@QQ4Q QILAAD@DE North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4§ Before the Clerk. J. A. Davidson vs JUDGMENT. B A Troutman This cause coming @m thebe heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Countyp North Carolina, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 8th day of April, 1926, plaintire Prog. cored a summons to be issued against the defendant and at the same time ftled in this Court his complaint, duly verified, and attached a copy thereof to the summons to be served on the deffendant; And it further appearing that said summons was returnable on the 20th day of April, 1926, and that said summons, together with a copy of the complaint, was served on the defendant on April l5thpy 1926; And it further appearing that this is an action for the recovery of $333.78 with interest thereon from March 8th, 1926, due the Plaintiff by the defendants failure to pay said sum agreeably to the contract for the sale and delivery of lumber to defendant, as set out in the complaint; ind it further avpearing that more than 20 days have expired st since the service of summons and copy of the complaint on the defenadnt, and that defendant has failed to appear and answer or demur ; And it further appearing that the defendnat is due the plaintiff the sum of $333.78 with iriterest thereon from the 8th day of March, 1926; IT IS, therefore, consfdered, adjudged and decreed that the plain- tiff recover of the defendant the sum of THREE HUNDERED THIRTY=-THREE and 78/100 ($333.78) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from the 8th dav of March, 1926, until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 17th day of May, 1926, J. A. Hartness Gs S. Ve @2Q2QQQQ2QW2XAAWA @2QGX% 1 North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. J. M. Stroud 4 vs 4 JUDGMENT oF THE COURT, J N Mithell ana wife Katie $ Mitchell and c w Mayberry, §N This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on Monday the 17th day of May tefore J A Hartness, C.8.C. of Iredell County and it appear’ i to t ng to the Court that the Simmons in this action was issued on the 3lst day on the 12th day of April, 1926; And it further appearing to the upon @ach of the defendants of March, 1926 and returnable Court that summons was served y reading said summons and by a @eaving a copy thereof to and with each of the said defendants: ? And it further appearing to the Court that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return day of said summons and no answer nor de- mur has been filed by said defendants; And it further appearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,642.40, with interst thereon from this 17th day of May 1926 until paid; And it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiffxnx recover from the defendants the costs of this action to be taxed by the Court. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defenadnts the sum of $1,642.40 with interest from the 17th day of May 1926 until paid with the cost of this action and for such other and further relief as he may be entitled to in law and equity. This the 17th day of May 1926, J. A. Hartness C. SL CL @vave@@eane @2Q22Q0H North Carolina, {4 In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 Before the Clerk. ye’ H T Steele vs JUDGMENT. 4 ) Samuel Turner and $ J. B. Hall 4 This cause coming on to be heard on this Monday June 7th, 1926, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the lst day of May, 1986 Plaintiff procured a summons to be issued against the defendants, returnable on the 15th day of May, 1926, and that said summons was duly served as to each of the defendants more than 100days befors ths return date thereof, and that plaintiff filed his verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the’ Superior Court before the return date of said sfimmons; And it further appearing that this is an action for the recovery of $3,443.50 with interest thereon from the 16th day of February, 1926, at the rate of six per cent per annum, due by express contract, to-wit, promisory note duly endorsed by each of the defendants; And it further appearing that more than 20days have expired since the return date of said summons and that defendants and each of them have fail. ed to appear and ahswer or demur to said complaint; And it further appearing that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $5,445.50 with interest thereon from the 16th day of February, 1926, at the rate of six per cent per annum; [It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plain- tiff recover of the defendants the sum of THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FORTY THREE and 50/100 DOLLARS with interst thereon from the 16th day of February, 1926, at the rate of six per cent percannum until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerkn of the Court, J, A. Hartness clerk Superuor Gourt Lredel. County/ YO Od XVOD DOH Lad AQ (OIA fa a North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Sefore the Clerk, J. K.?Morrison Grocery and Produce Company. Mason E Brown and J. Waugh and C H Brown, ) ) ) vs { JUDGMENT " § : This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Hone J. A. Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that the action is based on a promissory note for Four HUNDXED ($400.00) DOLLARS, with interest thereon at 6% from May 24ty 1924, and it appearing to the Cowt that a copy of the note is set out in the complaint filed the 15th day of May, 1926 which complaint is verified, and that the amount due is fixed ahd certain and that a copy of the complaint was served along with the service of the sumnons herein on each defendant, and it further appearing to the Court that summons issued out of this Court on the 15th day of May, 1926 under seal thereof and returnable on the 1st day of June, 1926, that said summons and complaint was served on the defendants on the 16th day of May, 1926 and that a copy of the original sumions and also @ copy of the original complaint was left with each of the above named defenadnts, and it further appeabing to the Court that no answermsbhave been filed in this Court by any of the defendants and that the time for answoring has expired and that no further time hes been asked in which to file answers, and that action now stands for judgment as of this date. It is therefore on motion of Monroe Adams, Attoreny for the Plaintiff ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff do have and recever judgment of the defendants in the sum of FOUR HUNDRED ($400) Dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of 6% from May 24, 1926, to- gether with the cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This Monday June 14, 1926. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superfor Court. (De (2 MARL GA ID 4A 4 QAM AM TEX North Carolina, 4} In the Superior Court Iredell County. 4§ Pefore the Clerk. Lynchburg Shoe Company vs JUDGH EN T. H. 8. Douglas This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N.C. and being heard, and it ap- pearing to the Court that on the 15th day of May, 1926, plaintiff procured & summons to be issued against the defendant, and at the same time filed in this Court its compla&ht duly verified ahd attached a copy thereof toethe Summons to be served on the defendant; And it further appearing that said summons was returnable on the esth day of May, 1926, and that defendant accepted service of said sun- mons, together with a copy of the complaint, on the 15th day of May, 19265 And it further appearing that this is an action for breach of an 6xpress contract to pay absolutely a sum of money fixed by said contract, ~ to-wit: for the recovery of $250.50 with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the lst day of July, 1925; And it further appearing that more than twenty days has expir. ed since the defendant accepted service of summons and copy of the complaint end that he, the defendant, has fai&dd to appear and answer or demur; And it further appearing that the defendant is due the plain-« tiff the sum of $250.50 with iriterest thereon from lst day of July, 19265; It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of TWO HUNDERED FIFTY and 50/100 ($250.50) DOLLARS with interest thereon from the lst day of July, 1925, at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, together with the cost of xh this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 14th day of June, 1926. J. A. Hartness GCG. 8. Gs Qo RAD DVB UAL AAD Qy AAA IA MAMA YA Boer ( North Carolina, 9 " In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Snider Brothers, Inc. § vs J. A. Robertson This cause coming on to be heard before J A Hartness; Clerk of the Superior Court and being heard and it appearing that the summons in this action was served on the day of April,,1926 and that a copy of the com- plaint was also served on the defendant and no answer having been filed and the time for filing the answer having expired, It fubther appearing that the complanit is based on a promis- ory note and that the said complaint was duly verified, [t is therefore on motton of Z y Turlington, attorney for the plaintiff ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $249.91 withb intherest from April 6, 1926 at six per cent pel annum until paid and the cost of this action, Monday, June 28, 1926, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. In the Superior Court, June 28, 1926/ Before the Clerk North Carolina, } Iredell County. | L. C. Mvers f ae ' JUDGMENT, H, C. Hunter and Z L Mabry 4} This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Covrt of Iredell Counby on Monday, June 28, 1926, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was {fesued on June 9, 1926, and served on June 10,1926, by reading and delivering copy of the summons ahd copy of the complaint 0 each of the defendants; and it further appearing to the Court that duly verified complaint was filed in said cause on the 9th dau of June, 1926; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2458.00, together with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from April lst, 1925, unt&l paid; and that said amount is a certian fixed amount; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants have not filed an answer in the time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudsed thut the plathtiff recover from the defendants the sum of $2458.00, together with interst at the rate of six per cent per anrum from the lst day of@ April, 1925, until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against said defendants. This June 28th, 1926. J. A. Hartness Ce B és 4@e 22COOLEE et FOOME CL @Wg North Carolina, In the Superior court, Iredell County. § June 28th, 1926. Dulin and Rachel King, Admrs,c.t.a. T, Weatherman, deceased. { vs § JUDGMENT. ' a. Carter, M.F. Carbher and J W Nash W Nash, Admrs, of M F Nash, dec'd. This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the under. signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, June 28th, 1log¢ and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 10th day of June, 1926, and served on the 12th day of June, 1926, by reading ana delivering copy of the summons and copy of the complaint to each of the defendants; and it further appearing to the Court that @uly verified com- plaint was filed in said cause on the llth day of June, 1926; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the Plaintiffs in the sum of $456.75, together with interest on same at the rate of six per cent per annum from June 10th 1926, until paid; and that said amount is a certain fixed amount; and it further appearing to the Court that the defend. ants have not filed ang answer in the time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs recover from the defendants the sum of $456.75, together with interst at the rate of six per cent per annum from 10th day of June, 1926 until paid, and that the eosts of this action be taxed against said defendants. This Jyne 28th, 1926. J. A. Hartness Ue Bs Us North Carolina, } In the Superior Court. Iredell County. § June 28, 1926, Pocahantas Guano Co, vs C. Be. Stewart Tais cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, the 28th day of June, 1926 and it appearing to the Court that summons fim this action was issued on the 9th day of June and served on the 9th day of June, 1926, k by reading and delivering copy of the Summons and copy of the complaint to the defendant; and it further appearing to the Court that duly verified @el plaint was fioed in said cause on the 9th day of June, 1926; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is indebted to the paaintiff in the sum of $798.00, together with interest on same at the rate of six per cent from June 7, 1926, until paid; and that said amount is a certain fixed amount; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant has not filed an amswer in the time allowed byb law; ze ig thererore ordered end adjudged that the plaintit’ recover from the poteudent 2h0 Aum Of $798.00, together with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from 7th dag of June, 1926, until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against said defendant, This Jyne 28th, 1926, J. A. Hartness Gs (Os Us @COCE CE @L@K a@ COC CCE HEOE North Carolina, 4} In the Superior Court Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Pearl Lippard 9§ vs ( q" JUDGMENT Conrad Wilson § This cause coming on to be heard, it is, by consent 6f bobh parties hereto, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover any sum whatsoever from the defendant and it is further ordered and adjudged that the defendant pay the cost of this action, the same to be taxed in accordance with law by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Countye The parties further agree that this judgment may be signed by the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina,. By Consent: - J. A. Hartness Pearl Lippard Clerg— Superior Court Plaintiff Iredell County, N.C. Conrad Wilson Defendanta Witness to above signatures, R. R. Boggs, Notary Pupjic | (NOTARTAL SEAL) My Comm, Expires May 15,1927 b CEE COMOO OOD @OC@ers North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, } Before the Clerke eee North Carolina, 8 In the Superior Court Tredell Co ntYe . Iredell County. ! Before the Clerk. errr ene tee Lazenby-Montgomery Hardware O06 JUDGMENT " any vs ~Wiltkinson “O65 nc. DEFAULT FINAL. Wpitiey-"! vs : i. N. Ammons ing on to be heard before the undersigned the Superior Court of Iredell County, N. O., on this the 12th day This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the een eee 4% pearing to the Court, that the summons was issued on Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard, sno the defendant on said date, and made r 4t appearing to the Court that on the lst day of May 1926, platntiff 3, and the the complaint, which was ve a : procured 8 summons to be issued against the defendant and on June 7th May 28, 1926, anda at the time of the 1926 filed in this Court his complaint, duly verified, attached a copy was served on the defendant by copy : ; s thereof to be served on the defendant; and it further appearing that -ause of action, was founded on an open ; 3 the summons, together with a copy of the complaint was served on the the defendant being for sunary goods s ae defendent on the 10th dey of June 1926; and it further appearing that fendant, and delivered te him, and it , . this is an action for the recovery of #472.00, with interest thereon twenty days have elapsed since the return ; rom ¥ay 12th 1924, due nlaintiff by the defendant for failure to vay defendant has filed no answer to eel ap aid sum agreeably to the contract for the sale and delivery of merch- ‘esaid has been paide E andise to the defendant, as set out in the complaint; and it further ordered and adjudged that the : . appearing that more then twenty days have elapsed since the service of ndant by default for want of an ans- therefc ae 3 5 5 , ae x! : the summons and copy of the complaint offi the cerencan and that the de- therefore considered, ordered ana adjudsed, that the Lazenby~ fendnat has failed tp appear and answer or demur; and it further appears Montgomery Hardware Company recover of the,defendant W. C. Hinshaw, the sum Four Hundr id 3 } 17 dwmty ing thet the defendant is due the plaintiff the sum of #472.00 with of Four Hundred and For ight Dollars and ,se en cents, with interest there= 6 , on from 1-7} 1e r7 tk ri . > Yeas . A 2 ae bi ‘ in Lerest } ereon f rom t ne } 2 th day of wu OV 924 . } . veer ieee , ons Lom ( vid paia an tne cos t of th is a ction, to +t is therefor Cy consider ed, dec eea anc ad nudged by at he plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Four Hundred and Seventy- two Dollars with interest thereon from the 12th dav of May 1924, until paid, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Yierk Sia lian of this Court. . A. Hartness oTerk Superior vourt. This 17th dag of July, 1926 of Iredell County. . ¥ LV» a . J. A. Haptness, Clerk Superior Yourt. YA AAS pes ff@ a QIK WAVMYYRIEOe In the Superior Yourt, North Carolina, ie Ipedell County. ! Before the Clerk, Farmers & Marchants Bank, a corporation, vs JYBRBGM#ELNT brawley estate, Lb B Bristol J N Me®lwee and others/ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under. signed Clerk of the Superior VYourt of Iredell County, North VYarolina, and it appearing to the Yourt that this is ang action on a note for borrowed money, and that since the filing of said action the note has been paid in & full, and that there is now no issue before the Court, it is therefore on motion of % J Shipp, Attorney for the plaintiff ordered and adjudged that plaintiff be permitted and it is so permitted to come into sourt and take a voluntary non-suit. Defémdant to pay cost of action, as part of this fudgement. this duly 22, 1926, Je A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, Cee DRS SEIS I, AIIM ALBA AN NAA Nobth Carolina, In the Superior Cort, Iredell County Before the Clerk, This cause coming on to be heard befpre the Clerk, and it ap- pearingto the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have compromired and settled thei iiffe 0 . & ‘ led their differences and that the defendant has paid the plainéi sift the sum agreed upon, and the plaintiff having come inte week ble fore the Clerk and requested permission to take a voluntary non-suit; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be and he is hereby non-suited, and iret the said plaintiff be taxed with the cost of this action, This the 26th day of July, 1926, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM MONDAY AUGUST 8, 1926., A. D. North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ) August Term, 1926. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the fifth Monday before the first Monday in Sept, 1926, the s«me being the Secord day of August, 1926, A.D., when and where His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the 15th Judicial District, Fall Term 1926, is present and presidicng, and Hon. Zeb Vance Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to-séfPve as jurors for the first week of this term of the Superior Court, to-wit: Tne following were drawn and sworn as Grand-Jurors for the term; G. L. Deal, D. K. McNeely, J V Niblock, G C Jordon, Frank Collins, T. M Hill, ” P Harris, * B Chester, J E Alexander, J T Tillery, J M Stiketeather, | F Hager, € L Warren, WD Hutchins, ". Lem Brown and J 3B Brown D. K. McNeely was appvointkd and sworn as foreman of the grandjury. O B Lazenby was appointed as officer of the vsrand-jury. Arthur Kinder, Harry P. Beaton and R B Patterson vere excused on lawful causes, J, Walter Murdock, J C Jenkins, S C Clark, M D Campbell, S J Smith, W. Loyd Cutting and V G Saunders were returned "Not to be found in Iredell County," The following were. drawn and sworn as petty jurors for the week; 2 L Sharpe, J B Brown, John H Brawley, — W Brawley, " A “assey, J M Powell, ” H Baxter and B H Cates, No, 53 FALSE PRETEBGE State Continued under former order, 4 ' ' 9 vs R 0 Kgles ( « No. 60 ) GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS. State 4 Contimued under former order, vs R O Kyles [ No. 79 State vs Robert Williams No, 106 State vs Robert Ruff No. 119 State vs felvin Tucker No, 134 State vs Buck Faulkner No, 148 State vs Willie Bel) No, 154 State vs Will Wason, No, 160 State vs Sam Holmes No. 164 State vs Harvey Campbell No. 183 State vs Lester Weaver No. 188 State vs Larence Heartly No. 1763 State vs‘ Clay Holland IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MUGUST TERM, 1926, Monday August 2, 1926, TO“APREAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Alias Capias, TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Alias Capias,. TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR. Continued for defendant, TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendant discharged,. T, AR CENY Alias Capias, FALSE PRETENSE, Continued under former order, ASSULT WITH DEADLY W«APON, Continued for B8tate, TO APPKAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Defendant appear and showed good behavior. It is ordered that the defendant be discharged, DAMAGING REAL PROPERTY? Continued by consent, LARCENY Continued for State, 'RANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR efehdané called and failed. J Sei Fa and Capias, Instanter, ee &t 9:00 o1 No. 198 State vs Elmer Miller Jim Davis No 199 State Vs J A Wright No 200 State vs J A Wright No 201 State vs JW Meridith No 193 State vs J P Lambert Norah Benfield No 202 State Vs Homer Shook No 203 State Vs Ransom Webster i i 4 4 ; cco SoS OS SS SP et oe ee OO <A IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, AUGUST TERM, 1926, Monddy August 2, 1926, LARCENY D*FENDANT Elmer Myller Called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. WBE GREK ABR XNK KM X LAA HMY KAM X KS XKMAXDERAKAKMEIO orah Not A True Bill, as to Jim Davis FORGERY The defendant comes into open court and pleads guilty of ettempt to commit forgery which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued on g000 behaviour for two years upon payment of the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, FORGERY This case consolidatedwith number 199, LARCEN CY The defendant comes into open court and thru his counselg Z V Turlington and Buren Jurney enters a plea of temporary larcency of an automobile. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be impribioned in the State Penitentary for a term of not less than THREE NOR MORE THAN FIVE YEARS FORNICATION AND ADULTERY The defendant enters a plea of Nolo Contendere. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued on good behaviour for two years upon paymeht of the costs. of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Nol Prosed with leave as to Nolo Contendre. LARCENCY The defendant waives bill and pleads guilty of simple larcency. It is ordered andadjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisioned in the common jail of lredell County for a term of SIXTY DAYS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, not to wear stripes DARCENCY The defendant waives bill and pleads guilty of simple larcency. It is ordered and adjudged by the court that the defendant be impriosened in the common jail of Iredell county for a term of FIVE MONTHS and assigned to work on the public roads for said county for said period. Not to wear stripes, This Honorable Court takes ax recess until Tuesday Morning, Clock AM, August Srd, 1926, residing & Holding the 15th Judicial District/fof North Carolina. AUGUSTM AY TERM 1926 MONDAY AUG 2 1926 NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPE}I OR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 1926 I. Claudius Hursell Dearman, do solemnly swear that I will support the , Constitution of the United States; so help me, God. Claudius Hursell Dearman, Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court this the 2nd day of August A D 1926 i A PF A McElroy, Judge Pres‘ding & Holding Courts ir 15th Judicial District, I Cleudius Hursell Dearman, do solemnly ‘and sincerely swear that I 9 will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to: the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof: and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the constitution of said State, not incossistent with the constitution of the United es, to the best of mv knowledge snd ability; so help me, God, "9 Claudius Hursell Dearman,. Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, This the 2nd dav of August, A D 1926. P A McElroy, Yudge Presiding & Holding Courts in 15th “udicial District, I,Claudius Hursell Dearman, do swear that I will truly and honestly dened myseaf in the practice of an attorney, according to the best of my knowledge am ability.; so help me, God, Claudius Hursell Dearman. Sworn to and subscribed before me in oven Court, this the 2nd day of August, A D 1926. P A McElroy, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts in 15th Judicial District, @@ cw NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court IRED*LL COUNTY: August Term 1926 Mr Claudius Hursell Dearman having presented in open Court a license sie by the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Couft of North Gere dated Jan. 25,1996@uthorizing him to practice as an Attorney and Counsellor ° law in the Courts of this state, and he having taken and subscribed to the oaths required of Attorneys at law in this state; It is ordered and adjudged that the said @laudius Hursell Dearman Df. and he is admitted to the practice of the proffession of Attorney and counsé at law in all courts of this state, It is further ordered by this Court that a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread upon the Minutes of this Court of this State. ThisstHer2hdrdayiof August, 1926. : P. A. McElro Judge Presia * AUGUST TERM 1926 MONDAY AUGUST 2, 1926 This Honorable Court convenes Tuesday, August 3rd, 1926 at nine o'clock A. M. for the dispatch of business, ] { § 4 No, 192 State vs. Bonnie Milstead No. 158 State VS. Major Foote No, 197 State Vs. Lonnie Rouse Lester Rouse No. 178 State Vs. John Ritchie No. 146 State vs. Clarence Eller No. 170 State vs, Arlee James No. 195 State vs, Smith Byers No, 196 State vs, Lawrence King No. 204 State vs, Fred McLelland PROSTITUTION Defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of prostitution, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common tail of Iredell County for a period of TY'ELVE MONTHS, FORGIBLE TRESPASS HOUSEBREAKING AND LARCENCY, The defendant Lonnie Rouse comes into open Court and through his counsels H. P. Grier and Grant enters a plea of not guilty. Counsdls for the defendant withdraws their plea and enters a plea of Nola Contender in charge of Simple Larcency. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Lonnie Rouse be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TVYLEVE MOWTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said County for said period; not to wear stripes, Let the monev be refunded, Nol Prossed with leave ss to Lester Rouse, TO APPEAR AND SHO” GOOD BEHAVIOR, The defendant appesred and showedegddd behavior, Continued under former order, TO APPEAR Continued under former order, HIGHWAY ROBBERY, Continued for State. ASSHULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Nol Prosse7? with leave, ASSULT WITH DEADLY "‘YEAPON, Nol Prossed with leave, HOUSEBREAKING AND LARCENCY. The defendant comesinto open Court and pleads guilty of femporaryLarcendy}awhtchyplea is accepted. Et is ordered and adiudged by the Court that ti defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Typedell County for a term of TWELVE MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public reads of said County for said period, to wear stripes. No. 205 State vs. Jess@eWilson AUGUST TERM 1926 TUESDAY AUGUST 3rd, 1926. CRIME AGAINST NATURE, After hearing the evdence in this case the foltowing issue was submitted to the jury under proper instructions by the Court; Is the defendant at this time incompetant ffom want of understanding to plead to the bill of indictment in conduct of his defense, ANSWER: Yes, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant Jesse Wilson be committ ed to the Hospita} for the dangerous insane at Raleigh, N. C., and confineg therein until discharged according by law. AUGUST TERM, 1926, Tuesday August 3, 1926, In the Superior Court North Carolina, ‘ 5 (4 0 Iredell County. August Term, 1926, Nellie C. Baggarlyz vs J. Wesley Baggarly. First: Has the plaintiff been a citizen and resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes Second: Did the plaintiff and defendant irter-marry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes Third: Did defendant abandon the plaintiff and have the plaintiff and.defendant lived separate and apart for more than five vears prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes North Carolina In the S»perior Court Iredell County. August term, 1926, Nellie C,. Baggarly vs. JUDGMENT J. Wesley Baggarly This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Irede1l] County, before His Honor, F. A. McElroy Judge Presiding and a jury and the following issues having been submitted to the jury: lst; Has the plaintiff been a citizen and resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action ss alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 2nd; Did the plaintiff and defendant inter-marry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 3rd. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and heve the Plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five years Prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in this complaint? Answer: Yes, All of said issues having been answered by the jury in the affirmative, therefore it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Nellie C. Baggerly ana Defendant, J. Wesley Baggarly be, and the same arg. sari eons vv eee Beano Mee a ne eRe Non Pere Sane TS SCENT ; a : | | No. 205 ) State t vs. ! JesseeWilson AUGUST TERM 1926 TUESDAY AUGUST 3rd, 1926. RIME AGAINST NATURE, C After hearing the evdence in this case the foltowing issue was submitted to the jury under proper instructions by the Court; Is the defendant at this time incompetant fom want of understanding to plead to the bill of {ndictment in conduct of his defense, ANSWER: Yes. It is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant Jesse Wilson be committ ed to the Hospital for the dangerous insane at Raleigh, N. C., and confineg therein until discharged according by law. AUGUST TERM, 1926, Tuesday August 3, 1926, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, } (9 Iredell County. 0 August Term, 1926, Nellie C. Baggarlyz vs ees 0's 8, ) J. Wesley Baggarly. First: Has the plaintiff been a citizen and resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes Second: Did the plaintiff and defendant inter-marry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes Third: Did defendant abandon the plaintiff and have the plaintiff and.defendant lived separate and apart for more than five vears prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes North Carolina In the S»perior Court Iredell County. August term, 1926. Nellie C. Baggarly vs. JUDGMENT J. Wesley Baggarly This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, F. A. McElroy Judge Presiding and a jury and the following issues having been submitted to the jury: lst; Has the plaintiff been a citizen and resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five vears prior to the beginning of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, end; Did the plaintiff and defendant inter-marry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3rd. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and have the Plaintirr and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five years Prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in this complaint? Answer: Yes, All of said issues having been answered by the jury in the affirmative, therefore it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Nellie C, Baggerly ana Defendant, J. Wesley Baggarly be, and the same @ hereby Bae Pee sai Re a dissolved and the Plaintiff, Nellie C. Bagzarly is granted and absolute Ai vores from the Defendant, J. Wesley Baggarly. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the Plaintiff Nellie C. Baggarly have the care and custody of Worth Baggarly ang Ruby Baggarly, minors. It is further ordered by the Court that the Plaintiff be taxed wipn the cost of this action by the Clerk of this Court. P. A, McElroy Judge Presiding in the 15th Judicial District of N. ¢, (AKL (OL ALANGKA AADAC ({QKAa Ga fhe @@G GROG G In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, JUDGMENT: C. M. Steele, H. C. Steele, A. P. Steele, F. F. Steele and E,. R. Rankin, partners, trading and acting under the} firm name and stvle of The Sabie Brick Comrany. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and being heard, and it apnesaring to the Court that the plaintiff in this action is a minor and is duly represented herein by his guardian, L. H. Hollar, who has been duly and regularly aprointed such guardian by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County: And it further apnearing that said action is for a personal injury fo said infant, Emret L. Hollar which haprened to him on August 22nd, 1922, while in the employ of the defendant, and while the said Emmet L, Hollar was attempting to get on or off a gasoline dinkey engine, in consequence of which the said Emret L. Hollar suffered an injury to his foot and ankle; And it further appearing to the Court that the parties hereto have mutually agreed to compromise and settle all matters at issue between them growing out of the aforessia injury to the said Emmet L. Hollar by the defendant paying to the plaintiff the sum of $341.80, and that the parties desire the sanction and approval of the Court in order to make said compro- mise binding, effective and valid by reason of the fact that the plaitiff's ward, Emmet L. Hollar, is a minor, and the Court having investigated the facts involved in said personal injury of the said Emmet L. Hollar for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not there was actionable negligence on the part of the plaintiff, and also to learn the extent of the injury to plaintiff's ward, and having made Such investigation had having examined thé witnesses who had personal knowledve of the matter, all for the purpose of enabling the Court to determine whether or not is is for the best interest of said Minor, Emmet L. Hollar, that said compromise and settlement of all claims, actions and causes of action which saia minor now has, or may have, against the defendant by reason of said per sonal injury be made for the sum of $341.80, and the Court being of the opinion, after having made such investigation, that it ts for the best interest of said minor Emmet L, Hollar that the matters at issue in this action be compromised and settled, and that the plaint'ff as suardian of said minor accept and receive from the defednan+ the sum $341.80 as settlee ment in full for all damages whatsoever which have heretofore, or which may hereafter, arise be reason of the infury received by the ssid Emmet L, Hollar growing out injurv aforeshsd: It is, therefore, considered, ordered, adiudged and décreed that it is for the best interest of Em et L. Hollar that the matters at issue in the above entitled case be conpro ised and settled for the sum of $34180, and that the plaintiff as cuardian for said Emmet L. Holler receive and be paid by the defendant the sum of $341.80 as settlement in full for all damages whatsoever by reason of the personal injury said Emret L. Hollar received, anc of the matters and things illéeged in the COMSLALINT, Eb is further, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the agree- ment of compromise and settlement entered into by and between the parties hereto be and the same is hereby in 311 things sanctioned, approved and confirmed, and it is, therefore, ordered, adjudgéd and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $341.80 as settlement in full Sor all damages whatsoever by reason of the personal injury received by the said Emmet L. Hollar at the time and on the occasion mentioned in the complaint, and the defendant upon payment of this judgment shall be forever discharged fro- any and all further liability to the said Emmet mometier abt Seid’ t. Wo heka> Vhdsvidually and ae caabdten of the sete Emmet L. Hollar by reason of the personal injury received by the said Emmet L, Hollar at the time and on the occassion set out in plaintiff's complaint, It is further adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. P. A. McElroy Judge Presiding BY CONSENT: 3 Mitchell torneys or Plaintiff Grier % Grier Attorneys for Defendant @@EG@OLREEQOOME (ay ONDEK AUGUST TERM, 1926. Tuesday, August 3, 1926. TO THE SUPERIOK COURT IREDELL COUNTY JUDGE P. A. MCELROY, Presiding. Wwe, the Grand Jury for August Term of Iredell County Superior Court, 1926, beg leave to make the following report: We have passed in all bills sent to us and made return to Ne have visited the Court House bya committee of eight. find all the offices and records neatly kept and convenient for the public who wish to refer to same. the vaults in Clerk's office and Register of Deeds office be made fire and burglar proof as near as possible and that more room be meade in these vaults. le visited the Countv Home by a committee of five. We find tbBere as follows: 17 white females, 10 white males, 6 colored femades, -ed males. Ne find vhite women insane snd 2 white men; 1 and 3 convicts. ‘ve find the inmstes satisfied with their treatment and say they are weli cared for. Thev have plenty of good food well prepared and that they receive kind treatment by Mr. Perry. The buildings are in good condition, neatly kept and crops on fsrm look sw Tine, Ye visited tke jail by a committee of eight. Ne found 16 prisoners, 8 white men, 1 white women and 7 colored men. They are clem and they are well treated. We recomrend that the Iron Beds which have been broken in some of the cells be prepared. We visited the Chain Gang by a committee of 5, We found 24 prisoners and 4 guards. They report that they are well treated and have plentv to eat. Thev have 12 mules, which are in first class condition, and such other equipment es is needed in the work they are doing. All tools seem to be in good repair, Respectfully submitted, D, K. McNeely Foreman of the Grand Jury SL Ans Judge Presiding and Ho in the 15th Judicial Dis of North Carolina. State of North Carolina In the Superior Court, County of Iredell Before the Clerk, THE FEDFRAL LANL BANK OF COLUMBIA VS. JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF FORECLOSURE G. B Stewart and wife, Addie B, Stewart, and the Statesville National Farm Lean Association. fhbsscause coming on to be heard before the undersigned as Clerk of the Suverior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, upon apvlication of the plaintiff, The Federal Land Bank of Columbia, for a judgment by default final upon its complaint, and for want of an answer, and being heard, the Court finds the following facts: 1. That summons was duly issued in this cause on the 22na day of July, 1926, and the same has been duly served on all of the defendants here-~ in, and a duly verified complaint was filed herein before the return day of said summons and a copy thereof served on sll resident defendants and that the defendants C, B, Stewart and wife, Addie B, Stewart, mortgagors, and the defendant, Statesville National Farm Loan Association, have neither appeared, answered nor demurred thereto and are now in default, and that more than twenty (20) days have elapsed since the return of the last summons issued in this cause, 2. That thés action is founded upon a vromissory note for the re- payment of money borrowed of the plaintiff, which was executed and delivered by the defendants C. B, Stewart and wife, Addie B. Stewart, and duly endorsed by the Statesville National Farm Loan Association to the plaintiff, which is how the lawful owner and bona fide holder thereof, and is secured by 4 mortgage of even date therewith duly executed and delivered to the plaintiff by the daid defendantsborrowers on the 29th day of October, 1921, which was duly recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds for the county and state aforesaid on the 29th day of October, 1921, in Book 56 at pages 20, and this mortgage covers the same land described in the plaintiffts complaint hereto- fore filed in this cause, which is located and boimded as follows: All that certain piece, parcel or tract of land containing 782.45 acres more or less, situate, lying and being on the Rock Cut Taylorsville Koad and on the Tony Point and Island Ford Road, about 12 milesfrom the town of Statesville, in Iredell County, Shiloh Township, State of North Carolina having sueh shapes, metes, courses and distances as will more fully appear by reference to a plat thereof, made by S, 0, Lazenby, County Surveyor, on October 1, 1921, and on May 10, 1919, and attached to the abstract now on file with the Federal Land Bank of Columbia, ‘The same being bounded as follows: _ 670.95 acre tract bommded on the north by the lands of J. A. Brown, - 0. Stewart, S. J, Fulbright, J. Q. Alexander Estate, on the east by the lands of J, H,. Waugh and J, R, Stewart, on the South by the lands of Ann Miller, T. A, Stewart, and John McLain, on the West by the lands of the Great Falls Power Company as to all lands lying be- tWeen the lands of C. B, Stewart, wiz., #@ all lands below conteu? line 170 and the Catawba River. bounded on the ugh, and s The 111.50 a Hoke lands . cres more or less known as the Hoke lianas, north by the lands of the J, Q. Alexander Egtate, J. H. Wa Se Juince Deal, on the east by the lands of F, B,. Elliott, J, A, Stevenson and J. E, Miller, on the south by the lands of S, B, Waugh, ana Je.R Stewart, on the west by the lands of J, H, Waugh, ’ 3, That the facts alleged in the plaintiff's verified complaint are to be true as alleged, and it appears threfrom that the condition of the mortgage herein mentioned has been broken and that thereis now justly due and owing to the plaintiff bv the said defendants mentioned in the next preceding paragraph ic the sum of Kight Thousand Four Hundred and Fifteen (8415.55) Dollars ang Fifty five cents, for all of which the plaintiff is entitled to demand judgment, 4 NOW, THERBFORK, on motion of the plaintiff's attorney, made on this the Fourth Monday in August, 1926, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: First: lat the defendants C, B, Stewsrt and wife, Aadie B, Stewart an e National Farm Loan Association are in default, and that plaintiff cover of them the sum of bhight Thousand Four Hundred and Fifteen llars and Fifty-five cents with interest thereon at siz (6%) per che date hereof until vaid, and the cost of this action; hat unless the indebtedness herein adiudged to be due the neluding the costs of this actiom is paid within sixty (60) days 5 the dat tre lands described in said mortgage to the plaintiff are nereby ordered and condemned to be sold at public auction at the Court ftouse door in this county and the proceeds ther of, after paying the costs of es of advertising, selling and conveying the said iding five (5%) per centum of the accep ted bid as comnensation for oner, together with all past due taxes and assessments thereon, * j i firs WHY + $a Ss, A ow 1 HDLL@0 Tirst upon his ids ent, and the surplus, 1? any, paid into for the benefit Of those entitled thereto: Third: Thea Cc T in oe 2 1. . Thtra: that C. LD. Moss be and he is hereby apvointed a Commissioner of +} his Court to advertise snd sell to the last id highest bidder therefor, upon the terms set forth, the mortgaged lands 4 i » Forth, the mortgaged lands described in thecomplaint herein and report his proceeding hereunder with ; Cc ings hereunder, with a complete statement of his receipts am disbursements, for future consideration sand orders by this Court: " ’ Fourth: That 70 a ourth: That the said vommissioner do require the successful bidder to deposit at once \ dim a _ P at once with him, or into this Court, the sum of One Hundred Fifty ($150.00) Dollars, either in cash or by certified check, the same to be applied © the 1 shoule th a b on e vid should there be a compliance therewith, but should there be a failure t pewit ae © comply therewith, then it Shall be forfeited to the plaintiff and the oremises res 3 k i sold on the same or the next convenient salesday thereafter upon the same terms and at such bidder's risk: . s Fifth: t i That upon the confirmation of the sale of said lands by the Clerk of the C \ ourt, and when the terms Of sale shall have been fully complied with, the said Commis; A ommissioner shal] make a title to the purchaser in fee, and thereupon the same shall be put into possession of the said premises on production of the deed; Sixth: That the terms of sale shsll be as follows: One-third (1/3) of the accepted bid shall be paid into Court in cash, immediately efter the confirmation of the sale, the balance on credit, payable in ®wo (2) equal annual installments, with interest thereon st 8ix (6%) per centum per annum, from the date of sale until vaid, and secured by a first mortgage of the premises on the part of the purchaser; provided, that the purchaser shall have the right, when complying with the terms hereof, to pay in cash the et ee any part of the credit portion of the purchase price, Should the cash rroceeds of the sale not suffice, after paying the costs of this actiom, the expenses of the sale including the compensation to the Comrissioner, and 41] u: taxes and assessments, then assessed upon the property, to discharge off the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in full, then any ba said judgment shall be evidenced by a separate bond and secured and separate mortgage of the premises on the part of the purcl ferred and assigned to the plaintiff. The hase all vay f the preparation and recording of all vapers including however, that revenue stamps need not be placed on the deed of convevance to the plaintiff, sould it become the purchnser, or on the bond securing any balance due the plaintiff on its judgment. m, Seventh: That permission i8 given to The Federal Land Bank of 4 Columbia to bid at saic ssle or at any resale of said mortgaged lands and case it is the successful bidder it shall not be required to make a dest with its bid and after paving the costs of this action, the amount of it Shall be applied as a credit upon this judgment; Kighth: That all right, title,interest and equility of redem of the defendants C. B. Stewart and wife, Addie B, Stewart as well as of bérsons whomsoever Claiming through or under the same in and to the premi or any part thereof herein ordered to be sold shall be, and pon sale of 1 e ands the same are, hereby forever barred and foreclosed. This the 25rd, day o August, 1926. J, A. Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court ev Iredell County, North Carol‘na, GCCOCL{a@e awa G@@QKE CEE CREMOWUu WwW Van ing North ~arolina, Iredell County. Anderson is cause con In the Superior Court, sfeore the Blerk. to be heard and being heard before the undersigned redell County on Monday September 20, 1926, summons was issued in this action on Aug. reading and delivering a copy of the she defendant; and it further appear. iplaint was filed in said cause on the earing to the Court that the defendant 1t hundred and twenty-six ($826,) 926 at the rate of 6% per annum mount is evidenced by a promise intiff the terms of which notes is causes; and it furbher ap- swer in the time aliowed by law: rdere that the plaintiff recover of J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. North Carélinay In the Superior Court, ) ) Iredell County.) ( Fs » + ‘ efore the Clerk, Carolina Motor Co. a corporation. vs Graham The plaintiff in this action havin; asked permission to take a voluntary defendant has settied all matters and things the amount due therefor; It is, therefore, ordered and the same is hereby dismissed and t} of this actin. 1926 This October lst, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Snider Bros,, Inc. Py ) vs. JUDGMENT ) ) E, R, Friday This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court, and being heard and it appearing that the complaint is this cause on an account was filed on Sept. 7, 1926 and that the summons and copy of the complaint were served on the defendant on Sept. 9, 1926, and that the complaint was properly verified and it further appearing that no answer has been filed, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $541.27.with interest from Sept. 16, 1925 until Paid at the rate of six percent per annum and the cost of this action. Monday, October 4th, 1926. J, A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court eee t : i j * orth Carol ina " 0 trede] - Stearns North Carolina, Iredell] G unty. JC Peck Pompany va Mrs Grace Dixon . ¢ 1 Cr . h , this cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court | . . . A ‘fare a © eatween the the parties hereto have compromised and settled the differences between a, ) . ) y P »Aar Jfuda red and Pon motion of John New! tt, Attorney for the Plait “iff, oY ered, At sec l decreed that the Plaintiff be and is nonsuited. Thi -he 2 v October, 1926. h 8 the 25ra da of 0 + I. A. Hartness “Gjerk Superior Court. We hereby consent to the monhsuit; _ John Newitt Attorney for Plaintiff —...__J-_W. Sharpe si Attorney for Dfendant. Ao OCLEE. CU CEE 1@ @AAECOGE Oe Shpbdhse sesh st areeeeentenee ee renE cree En ce io cere ae Pee ee 138 North Carolina, In the Sunerior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk/ Yount trading and doing ,esSs wncer the {4 rr name ¢ ty a of Yount votor Co. vs This cause coming on to be heard vefore the Clerk, ny ~ aifferences and that the defendants have paid the plaintiff the and the plaintiff having come into Gount before the Clerk and untary mom-suit; therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the hereby non-suited, and further that the defendants be and it ap- ‘ourpt that the plaintiff and defendants have compromised and NOVEMBER TERM, MONDAY NOVEMBER 8, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Rugust Term, .1926. u | t remembered that a Superior Court begun ana he in and for Be I i iad for the State and County aforesaid, on the 9th Monday affter the first Monday 1926, the same being the Eighth day of November, 1926, A. D., when and Septes yhere Hi 3 Honor, r a McElroy, ducge Presiding and Hold ng Courts . the isth Judicial District, Fall Term 1926, is vresent and presiding, and Hon. seb Vance Long, Bolicitor, is present and rrosecuting in the name of the State. u. P, Alexander, the High Sheriff of le11 County is present and returned into open Court the names of a al hie + : , so i Pees ae ee serve as jurors for the first week of this t of : to-wit: ing were drawn ana sworn as Grand-durors for the term; J, S. Bebber, ° a ae ag ge Cees as pp ae eae as, Je A. Reavis, W. A. Lambert, B. M, McNeely, Y. hite, X f NeNeely, Francis N. Moore, ’. E, Creedmore, J. A. Gatton, Georke tov E. Deal, C. C. Ward, E. M. Mass Kistler, S. Z. Hoover, Reavis was ppvointed and KR. Lazenby was appo'nted as ff i f : grand=-j)ury. G : Benf i eld, As 7. Me shal 1 a? . \ yerpe return jn Iredell County. The following were drawn 4t 43 j for Tl week; m A , Pp L Ry : Wilkinson ‘ ‘ Crater, Jes te Ae OD! ’ r 1 7 r Mh, amas Rahert GC. 3. Hobs, ¢ « Cowan, K ky rmfield, , Th iS, Hooert f 1 R K } M . ‘ r y Mirdaoct Brawley, N. D, Tomlin, i. Knox, Rov &. Morrison, anc urdock. No, 53 FALSE PRETENSE State Gontinued under former order. vs. R, 0, Kyles No. 60, GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS. State Continué@d under former vs, R, Uy Kvles No, 79 { State ) 4 APPEAR AND SHO GOOD BEHA Alias Cavias vs, Robert Williams No. 106 ) ) APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD REHAVIOR. State 4 t 4 Alias Capiea vs, Robert Ruff N : . a. APPEAR AND SHOW THAT HE HAD PAID COURT COST. vs, Instanter Cavias. Clarence Eller ee — an TERM, 1926. peeeeT TERM, 1926. * Monday, % 8, 1926. oe NGlbset 8, 1926. FABSE PRETENSE. 214 LARCENY Continued under former order, patie Continued by consent. ( VS8e J, 6. Johnson TRANSPORTING ND POSSESSING LIQUOR. Nol Prossed with Leave. LARCENY State The defendant waives bill of indictment and enters a nlea on. of simple larceny, which plea is accepted by the Solicitor John Booe for the State. Lewis Campbell It is ordred «nd adiuged by the Court that the defendant ND SHOW THAT HE HAS PAID COST oe. pes soned in the C CBMOR jail of Iredell County for a IND SHC T 1K S MIL ik COST. rerm of SIX MONTHS and assigned to work on the public ‘ontinued under former order. roads of Iredell County with leave of County Commissioners at the expiration of three months to hire the defendant out. Capias as to Lewis Campbell. No. 215. rr nny naar Seep nen enn No. 217 FORNICATION ] State The defendan *s om int n Court ar GQ plead guilty vs. to Fornication and Adultrv as charged in the bill J, A, Cloafelter indictment. Mrs. J. P. Bost. It is ordered and adjudged that the @efendant, J. Clodfelter, be imprisoned in the common iail of Iredell] County for a term of NINE MONTHS and ass‘tgned to as eye on the public raeds of aaid County for said veriond. Tt is further ordred and adjudged by the Court that the aéfendarmt Mrs. J. P. ost be imvrisoned in th 2ommon jail of Iredell County for a term THI I ee ee nC et eee een en cee ee comes into oven court and through his t, of guilty of lington, e: rs a plea in the warrant, 1d a@judged by the wurt that the defentat and the costs j | | ] 4) j ULT “ITH DKADLY WeAPON.WITH INT NT TO KILL. _ The déferidant through his counsel, waives will of ctr = t and enters a vlea of gnilty of Assault with Dead 3 a Thich plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the! 8tate, icone ts ordered and adjudged by the Court that the lefendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iwedell nee for a term of 12 months and assigned to work on public roads of said County for said period. This Honorable at 9330 o'clock A. M. oN OR OM eet > > ph poigag ' ARKYLNG CONCKALED WEAPON. VS. — : iant comes into onen Court and pleads guilty w. Cc ¢ Concealed Yeanon as charged in the pill of ; A. JL This case consolidated for judgment in No Judge Presiding & ; the-toth Judicial Dis North Carolina. . Overeash NO. 2ios State ty tly of Bc defendant comés into ppen Court and pleads gut ity W, C, Overcash Fe te dadesen tk (ei ee indictment. : hebaumicns ae ee and adjudged by the Court that thé Soa ; 9 imprisoned in the common jail of Typedell ty for a term of SIX MONTHS and assigned to work the public road wear stil peas s of said County for said period. To I : 1 . ‘ i ee | NOVEMBER TERM 1926 Tuesday November 9th, 1926 This Honorable Court adrivéneddacconding to adjournment Tuesday Worning November 9th, at 9:30 O'clock AM for the dispatch ofbusinesss, N 16 LARCENCY State The defendant comes into open court and thru his V counsel, Buren Jurney and H C Dearmon entered a plea of Not Guilty. Jury No 1 being 4nlv sworn and em. pannelled for their verdict found the defendant ent lty of Larcency as charged in the bill o8 indictment, : It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisioned in the common jaik of Iredell Gountv for a term of SIXTY DAYS and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, not to wear stripes, Vv Rod Suwnmers NOoOnNyY nto open court and thru his Turner, enters a plea of Not being sworn and empannelled for i the defendant guiity oF lar- as chargéd in the bill of in- lered and adjugbed by the Court that imprisioned in the common jail of a term of SEVEN MONTHS and assigned blic roads of said county for said , 4 . wear stripes, into open court and thru his rier and H C Dearmon, enters a nanslaughter as charged in Adjudged by the Court that ioned in the “tate Penitentary of not lessthen 5 years NOV*MBER TERM 1926 TUESDAY NOV 9 1926 TO THE SUPERIOR COURT: IREDELL COUNTY We.the Grand Jury for November Tan ie e, tk : ury for November Term of Iredell County Superior Court 1926 beg leave to make the following revort: e have passed on aii bilis sent to us and made return to Court Je have visited the Court House bv &@ committee of seven and fina ven, } t that the affairs of the County have increased tosuch an extent that the Clerk's office and the “egister of Deers of fta: re not large enoug! the records and to furnish space needed for the storing of said enough room necessary to execute the husiness of th t ‘are offic orfice ; the Farn emonstrator i: thebusiness of this office: am tha the office intendant of Schools snd the Board of commocate theschool work of said office uties therein. We recommend that somet? relieve this condition. Ye Pisited lored females t they receive kind treatment fron condition, neatly kept Thefarm vrain, Committee of fivevisited white men, 10 colored men and Wagons, The men reported + t and dre wll cared for. sy all the equipment ts in 2 ondition. sommittee of 7 visited the jail ar 1 the following priséners 2 white woemen and ® whi The vrisoners renort that are well treated and have plenty to eat Also we found the building food condi tion, Respectfully submitted. J A Seavis, Foreman of the Gfand Jury. a ed This Honorable Court takes a recess vntil Wednesday Morning, h ti: ‘Ovenber 10th, at 9:30 AM, =~ CL, Jk. - Judge Cet ce & Holding Judicial Distr NOVEMBER TERM 1926 Wednesday November 10th, 1926, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment Wedmésday Morning November 10th, at 9:30 o'clock A, M, for the dispatch of business e No. 119 TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR, State KmxxikxnetxKLouxxnexExures, VB. Nol Prosed with leave. Melvin Tucker WITH DHADLY WEAPON, Prossed with Leave, HIGHYAY ROBBBRY, Nol Prossed with Leave, reer iL QU Capias and continued, 700D BEHAVIOR, Inned under former order, GING REAT PRN RpPyYy \ | ! Fi re ; Nol-Pragsed A ite peer if Coreen Cte Cc Stn AY, ot 4 / | IY 4 i L eo oat ted end fat Tea. tuderent—it+et—_Sei_F Cantes 7) or , Lote Ly an eke ee ae transferred to civil docket. , ADUDTRY , LU 18 ordered by the Court that Mws. Delle . L& ee Se marked as prosecutrix, and it is adjudged vv 6 » (4 mt + f OY e Court that she be taxed with the costs. with leave, > NOVEMBER TiH#RM 1926 Wednesday November 10th, 1926, North Carolina, [In the Superior Court, Iredell] County. November €e oihyrt926, Lis Ci. Atwell, Plaintiff Vs. ORD#R ALLOWING KFENDANTS TO AMEND ANS! Southern Railway Company, North Carolina Midland Raimway Company and Charlie Savlor. 4 Defendants 6 This cause coming on to be heard hefore Bis Honor P, A, McKlroy, Judge Presiding and holding the courts of the District, and being heard upon the motion of the defendants to amend their answer in the following parti- cular, that is to say, by amending their first further answer and defense to plaintiff's alleged cause of action by adding Paragraph 2 in the following words and figures to-wit: e defendant Southern Railway Company was engaged { plaintiff was emnlovyed by it in irterstate commerce within the meaning and intention of the Federal Emplover's Liability Act and that this action and the plaintiff's rights and defendant's liabilities therein are cortrolted and to be determined by the laws of the United States of America and said Southern Railway Company and said Caroline Midland Railway Company hereby expressly plead the said Federal Emplover's Liability Act as being the law controllire this action md hereby exvoressly set up and rely upon their Federsl rights and immunities under and bv virtue of the laws of the United States." es . ‘ ; : : 2 That at the time and occasion pneferred to tn the comr e Interstate commerce And it appearing to the Court that notice Guly given and accepted by plaintiff's counsel, It is, Therefore, considered and ordered that the defendants be and they sre hereby allowed to amend their answer by adding to the first r further unswer anid defense to plaitiff's allesec cause of action Paragraph 5 2 in the words and fi gures above set out. f This the 10th day of November, 1926. P, A. Mcklroy Bist! Juege presiding and holding the November Tarm of Sunertior Court of I»edell County. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning, N . Cvember 12, 1926, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. Ob, VEC La. Judge Prestding and Holding courts for The 15th Judicial Di North Carolina, November NOVE! I DAY 1 is Honorable Court convenved according to adjourmmant Fria 12t} at 9:50 o'clock A. M. for the dispatch of business, ily il Fe W\ Le e No. 241 i | In the Bupertor Court Noven ber: Term, 1926, ’ : lorth Ca Qn me del } yaning JUDGMENT met ee ee rd before His Honor P, A. McF] ‘ cE lroy, aring that the parties have fngethe plaintiff the sum of six percent and heats the cost the vlaintiff recover with ix percent and that thedefend- the Clerk, P. A. McElroy Judge Presiding the Sunerinr November: Term, 1926 ard hefnar H Tanne ird before His Honor, P. iat the parties have plaintiff the sum plaintiff recover the cost he paid naff this Court, with the cost of A, MNcnlroy Presiding Ne- + ‘ > North Carolina Iredell County, In the Sunericr Court, November, Term, £926. John Annie the Plaintir ‘aintiff been a citizen and resident of the NOVENBER TERM, 1926, FRIDAY NOVEMBER L2, 1926, state of North Carolina for more than five consecutive years prior beginr ing of thi 8 acti on as alleged in th eA 20rNbs int? ait z, py cis Answer: Yes. Second: Did the Plaintiff and Deferdant inter-marry as jn the complaint? Answer: Yes, Third: Didthe Defendant wrongfully aba: she Plaintiff ana have theplaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five consecutive years prior to the heginring of is action as in the complaint? Answer: Yes, North Carolina, Tredell County. John E, Smith 1 Annie Smit! 9 + +h i s tern C e This cause coming on to be heard Superior Court of Iredell County before His Ho A, McElroy, re Presiding and a jury, > ef Cit resident Onenchl< more than five,years prior to the alleged in the Did the Plaintiff and Deferdant interemarry as all Yes. Third: Did the Defendantf4baron tt Plaintiff and have the Corre ‘f and defendant lived separate a for more than fiver years prior to the beginning of this action as al in the comvolaint? Answers: Yes, All the said issues having been answered by the jury in the sfir- s ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the a) mative, therefore it bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff John E, Smith and the defendant Annie Smith, be and the same are hereby dissolved and the plaintiff John E. Smith is granted an absolute divorce from the defad- énd, Annie Smith, It ig further ordered that the Plaintiff be taxed with the cost of this action by the Clerk of this Court. P. A, McElroy “jade Presiding in the loth Judicibal District of North Carolina 148 NOVEMBER TERM, 1926, — wl ' NOVEYBER TERM, Loz6. FRIDAY NOVEMBER 12, 1926. FRIDAY NOVEMBER 12, 192 No. 258 283 : No. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Fall Term - 1926, , North Caroli na, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Iredell County. August 9, 1926, ROY KELL Bwe-~-Plainziff krnest Babs t ie JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT. | VS. } JUDGMENT BY DePrayLT ) j LE KELLY¥Y-Defends Harvey Houston ing on to be heard, and being heard before His This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk 1d it appearing to the Court that . 3 of the Sunerior Court of Iredell County, on this Monday the ninth dav of ly, having failed to avoear before this Court August, 1926; and it appearing to the Court thst the summons in aintiff having been duly called bv the action was issued on the 14th day of Apr’ 926, and served on c pearance, it is therefore considered : anétApril 15th, ¢ and that the complai was filed May the 8thj, 1926 aid cause of action be, and is hereby \ duly verified; and that the plaintiff's cs of action was founded upon non-annearance of plairtiff, a contract for the purchase. of a house and lot, and for the specific pere action he taxed against 2 . formace of said contract; and that no an has been filed in said comp the Court. es IT IS THER*FORE, considered, Dlaintiff h:ve fudgnrient against the defen ant "OY Va » OF an answer $ P., A. McElrov Judge Presiding is therefore adjudged that judgment is herein entered against the defendant by default, snd inquiry to executed at ct term of the Suverior Court of Iredell County, N. C. That the caus Slaced uy the brial docket of said Court. This the 9th dav of August, J UDGM HN T North Carolina 1 the Superior Court, and being heard before His Tredell County. November 12, 1926. T - Judge anvearing to the Court that Rrnest Rah ov ANNHNS : > ‘ tamns h: ‘ ty ai] a 5 Yr aw = Plaintiff ’ l -O annear before this Court to : prosecute said action, and upon Laintiff ; ¥ ’ iV upon plain naving been duly called by the . yn 1 Ha iMvIa pearance, it 4s therefore considered ee Houston Jaf | i, VJéetTendant eneriff . ty Court, and fatled to ordered and adjudged. the . 3 ad judge a, tna 7 aforesaid cause of acti on be dismissed and a ~ - te) , ’ 4 + x : fs dismissed, for ¢ } 4 CAUSE coming on to be heard before HIS HONOR, P. A. McElroy, ae? £OL CAUSE NOVSlN etateds tocwit o.A , 5 UO=-W1LT, n-avpearance of Plisintiff, T 1 Preaeia o * $ 1 t John Stamps, before this Ge pale vudge Presiding, November Term of the S uperior Court of Ipedell County, and 79 Cn Ss vourt, in the prosecution of this action against 4 + . v’ appearing to the Court, that Judgment was taken before the Clerk of the , defendant, Sarah S$ C it Stamp vosts of this action t * %\UNiS action to be taxed against the noobs : Superj op Court of Iredell County. on the 9th dav of August, 1926, by default ! mete Onn ovemps, by the Clerk of the Court | : - for want of an answer; and the cause transferred to the trial docket of this TH 4a oO+. > + this, 12th day of Noverber, 1926, Court by the Clerkf and it further appearing to the Court, that thedefendant P, A, McElroy J He ACH Judge Presiding 01 ston contracted with the plaintiff in writing to sell the plaintiff & certain house end lot, situated in North Statesville on Turner Avenue, being lot number twelve, block F. of the North Statesville Land Company plot, mecorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, Book 15, Page 54, for a consideration of Three Hundred and Fifty Dollars, payable part Cash and Part on time, and it also appearing from the complaint which is 150 verified for infant the 1 exceT defenda Vs S + q represen t OVEMBER TERM, FRIDAY NOVEWBER 12, Ia a + oO 2 1926 1926, deferdant the full purchase price ars and Fifty-nine cents and that and has demanded of the defendant refused and neglected to do, ordered that and adjudged, Clerk of the Superior Court, the Ale the sum of Five Dollars and fiftyenine and that the plaintiff is now the owner deed therefor, according to the tha defandant: it is *y they further, hereby appointed a Commi for the land aforesaid, against the defendant for . Ncklroy Judge Presi di ng order. ssioner NOVEMBER FRIDAY NOVEMBER iz, No, 289 North Carolina, Iredell County. Lacy Craig, Plaintiff vs. C, Clyde Craig, Defendant THIS CAUSE coming on to + ‘ Pp h "07 Judge, at this term of the Cour the cause Gaston Co remove s $A ° C Aence 15 1 gala seconc County, discreti Court the hearing th Court the plaintiff ae e Iredell Gounty, N. 0.5 PemMn defendant to oni +} a unty, is overruled, an the discretion [THER ORDERED, the first This Court Honorable November 13th, 9:30 Atal TERM, 1926, be t, idence takes nim 1926, ee In the Sur or Court, rYyrTembhan ON MOTION a until Saturdsy Morning recess FJuaee Presiding & Holding Courts for the 15th Judicial strict of North Carolina. NOVEMBER TERM, 1926. ae wn NOVEMBER TERM, 1926 SATURDAY NOVEMBER 13th, 1926. SATURDAY NOVEMBER 13th, 1926. 301 effective and valid by reason of the faxt that the plaintiffs ward ' nt s ‘ McLean Thomas Scott, is a minor, and the Court having investigated the farts = trvolved in said versonal injury to the ssid Thomas Scott for the pure nose of ascertaining whether or not there was actionable negligence on DOE - l > f2 f ; l ; the part of the plaintiff, and also to learn the eatent of the iniury iefendants indebted to to plaintiff's ward, and having made such investigation and h: examined the wi ; -s who had personal knowledge of the In the Superior Court, the purpose of enabling the Court to determine whether or not $ mm, November Term, 1926. the best interest of the said minor, Thomas Scott, that said and settlement of all claims, actions and eauses of minor now has, or might hereafter have, agéinst the said personal injury, be made for the su of the opinion, after having made suct before s Honor >. A. McElroy, best interest of said Tho: and the having answered the be compromised and settled, and © rcept and receive from t the vlaitntiff taking men full for all damages whatsoever 5 this Court and that the ” 4 r, arise by reason of the out of the injury aforesaid; cKlrovy [f IS, THEREFORE, considered; a ease tpi if for the hest interest of Thoras Sco 4% above ed case he compror $ aq aj anc the Sunerior urt that the plaintiff as guardian for the defendant the sum of damages whatsoever by reason of the 1 ceived, and of the matters and things alleged in the comr ed that the agreement of It is further ordered, adjudged and decre corpronise and settlement entered into by and between the parties hereto be at this Term of Court and being and the same hereby in all things sanctioned, anproved and confirmed, and At ‘ to the Court the : ea cas ae i. te ei . a s C UY AG aintiff in this action is a t is, therefore, ordered, adjudged ana decreed that pnlai ntiff recover of et : , ae : : + i key ss oe ee eral guards an, Henry Scott, thé def endunt the sum of $750.00 as settlement ir 1377 or all da izes what guardian by the Clerk of the soever by reason of the personsal injury received by the Thomas Scott at the time and on the occasion mentioned in the complaint, and the defendant appearing that said action is for a versonal upon payment of this judgment shall be forever déscharged from any and all t hia A eawre a4 i * ‘ 1 } 4 ‘ » which hapnened to him on April 13th, further 14 avility to the said Thomas Scott, and the said Henry Scott, 926 Dy» hi baln ss \ " 7 ved 4 Q . br a of the 1. £2 W AV L ead ng into W onroe Street in the ind vi dug L} Vy ana ag guardai an of th e 8 al a homa 8 oco t Vv reasor! on Ulty of Statesville wren 3 . - 1 46 Wnen ne sida Vx ° 2 © enly dartedifin front of defendant's truck Personal injury received by the said Thomas Scott at the time and on the and was struck by it j : S$ Vv “s In consequence \ * i ees 1 of which the ssid Thomas Scott suffered Cecaston set out in plaintiff's complaint. an injurv to his foat and other ar r parte of his body; It is further adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defandant ind it A further appe 1 + Bee ae presring to the Court that the parties hereto have the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. muvua V agreed to cao promise ees anc sebble allumatters at issue between them P, A. McElroy rowir t - oP insee me Tud 7 OF Bhe aforesaid injury to the said Themes Meese be GG % we paying to the nlainti¢ er ekg BY CONSE T: If the sum of $750.00, and that the parties desire the oe Sanction and approval of the od Hugh G Mit r & Gri ; Court 4 eee Mitdhell Grier rier n order to make Said compromise bindings jag Attorney for PaainttrTr ttorneys for ¥ rendant 154 NOVEMBER TERM, 1926. North Carolina, Tredell County. ar Stella McCoy if on het ine, ty PRY the Court i f 1t in the record I } i i. therefore orde SATURDAY NOVEMBER 13, 1926, In the Superior Court, November Term, 1926, . to be heard at this Term of the Superior ng heard before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, the jury having answered the iseues sub- favor of the vlaintiff and ag&inst the defend. ijudged by the Court that the honds and detf'erdant be and 8 granted an ahsolute divorce ized that the plaintiff pav the costs om. Juage Presi Term of the Sunertor Honor, P, A. McElroy, swered the issues sub- against the pan ~A aA Ar A . ‘ rea and adjudged by the Court that the matr4 — TATA aie aie atrimony herefofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant the same sare hereby Aiea 7 ; v dissolved and the plaintiff 18 granted an 5 absolute divorce from the defend: plaintiff pay the costs of this Liaw ant. It if further adjudged that the action, P. A. McElrov meena esac logs a eS ON Judge Presiding ee NOVEMBER THRM, 1926, SATURDAY NOVEMBER 13, 1°26 259 -Lottie B. Ally vs. Robert B, Alley---Continued. 220- 263- 264- 271- No. 269 Clarence Novemher Joe Byers vs. Sarah Byers---Continued, R. W. Zeigaerypvs. J. F. Combs, Lelia Combs, wv « Continued by consent. R, L. Shuford vs. Mrs. M. S. Brawley, Admr. deceased-~--Continued by consent, G. and M. Service Statton vs, Continued for plaintiff. » and a new tri Mavhew Jury withdrawn This Honorable Court takes a l5th, 1926, at 10:00 O'clock a», Juave prestoaing fer the 15th of Nort fe W Carpenter, of R. V. Brawley, al ordered, ar iy Sourts n NOVBMBER THERM, 1926, SECOND WEEK, Monday, November 15, 1926. In the Superior Court, Second Week November Termp 1926. North Carolina, [redell Cour CY. Tis Honorable Court meets according to adjourmmant at 10:00 o'clock, A. M onday Morning, November 15th, 1926 when and where His clock, | Lior A, McElroy, Judge Presiding and holding courts ef the 15th $41 District of North Carolina, is present and presiding, this the nd Weektfor Civi: “Gases at November Termy 1926, -xunder, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North into open Court the nemes of the following good and of this Court for the second week for ci Goodin, L. A. Boggs, KR, By Bi iho) Pittle;,. By. Ts Lazenbv, J, M. Gatton Parke, 0, Ds GOLlene; ds GC. W.. Pane,: ena 2,..G, Cis ‘or lawful ause Joseph 8S, Grose t urned as, "Noti to be found ir rler, and R. L. Sarnard, } the Sunerior Court, November 15, 1926. Soe ee befare HIS HONO! A. Mce- 7) wate Tiavce Prnaa } ‘ ; lroy, Judge Presids istrict, at this term of the Snnertor Court unty; AND \PPKARING to the Court, that +h 6 4 ~ a 4 « r 3 . e parties to th jjusted their difference, AND it further ce, ; the C he defendant J. C, Burgees, holds a note canred by & mortgage, hnonse and lot situat ed near the C3 ty Limites Statesville, N, C., ‘cuted by the y lair t4 ie ae Ria 0. MecHargue and wife, M. Powell and KR rowell, in the sum of Three Thousand Dollars, Ant + 2 a ae oe ss ics dated the lst day of March, 1923, and recorded in the office of the R ater of PAa . * ) ‘ Register of Deeds for Iredell County, Book 57, page 183, which mortgage , * > 4 » was assigned and trans{erred T ‘ 1 to J. C, Burgess, who now holds the same; Y AGREEMENT B AGREEMENT of the parties hereto, and in compromise of all matters anc differences between them, in the above entitled action, it 18 shat , orderéd, that a credit be placed On said mortgage and the note easunee thereby sufficient to reduce the prj neipal of Two Thousand Dollars, which amount it is agreed on between the parties » 48 the amount due thereon, ac of the 15th day of Novenber, 1926, end that the plaintiff shall from Willians *% Keavis ins ~ a 157 NOVEMBER TERM, 1926. Monday, November 15, 1926. 4a date have six months within which to redeem said mortgage by paying the 8 4 ae off with interest from November 15, 1926, and if same is not vaid at sar Ty the expiration of six months, the right to sell and foreclose said mortgage j reserved to the defendant, under the powers therein contained. Let each s "ebH , party to this action pay his costs to be taxed by the Clerk. P, A, McBlroy * Judge Presiding By consent: sf Timmer & Turner, Attorneys for Plaintif er SE - Attorneys for Defendant. Lewis *« Lewis ae eae No, 304 . the *1)7 at ¢ North Carolina, In the Suveri C itv November Term 19 Iredell County. Novembe I Hwa. KR. D. Gray Li Were the plaintiff and defendant intermarried alleged in the complair t? Answer: Yes. 2 Did the defendant ngfully abandon the plaintiff me as red in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 5 l4uvead a Tr: ata and 3. Have the defendant and tved separate “ : rommencement of apart for more than Five successive years commer s 7 sas _ hawt fai) ym the pnart of the this action, and was said separation without! palintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. ’ I¢ raat en , “ne os Has the vlaintiff been a bona fide resident of tk * ‘ } . " ne I4rgq0 +he commrence@- S . WN 1 > .y an fiv vears preceeding > C State of North Carolina for more than ? ive yea k laint? ment of his acion as alleged in the compia Answer: Yes, North Carolina, Irn the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term 1926 Mrs, R, D, Gray VS. Johnnie Gray THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard at this term of the and the Dourt before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, JyWAge Presiding, and a jury, a eg nee te aan 158 NOVEMBER TERM, 1926. , a : Monday, November 15, 1926. having answered all the Sssuessubmitted, as is shown of record, in favor of the vlairtiff, 4<¢ therefore ordered, adiudged and decreed by the Court that bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, ang are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute the defendant. further ordered, decreed and adjudged by the Court that the and she is hereby granted full custody of erine Grav end Charlotte Gray, minor children of the plaintiff and défand- ant Ny thetr said mg This } § ay of November A P., A. MeBlroy suage Presiding of the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina. rier Court, November Term, 1926, } A : f t y t urt agree to refer al and conditions: is mutually agreed upon to nominate another arbitrate ‘ ei. and the def ndants! counse! the name to plaintiffs! counsel, both davs after the submission of resnecti ve investigate and either accept or rejest pronosed any additional selection eithey ot y rtieag ana 4 n the event a second arbitrator is to be selected hey sre to ) have one week from the declination of the first arb { ae ‘ ] aT tO Select and submit a second, and so on, wntil the arbitrators sre finally agreed upon, agreed that the report of this board of arbitrators 80 selected as ab provided, shall be final and become a rule of court with- out exception from either side, the award to be final and binding on all the parties to this litigation, and be the final judgment of the court. P, A, McElroy By eonsent: Judge Presid ing Self & Bagly, Attorneys for Plaimtirr Grier & Grier, Attorpeys for Defendants Monday, No, 208--J. B. flo, 305--C1vde No, 204-- aA. W. Dula V8. North Carolina ; 12+ November 16th, NOVEMBER TERM 1926 November 15, 1926, Colt Cornpany vs. KE. Pruit Hager--Continued by consent. Sharpe vs. Etta Sharpe--Continued, Continued for the plaintiff. This case is to be set as tre first case on the first day of March Term of the Civil Court. Ovtometric Society Ss Hin) @) Honorable C . o'clock A. MM. CW vuage Presiding and fer the 15th Judic of North Carolin: NOVEMB VEMBER TERM, 1926. WEP! ESDAY PUKSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1926, , 's Honorable Court convenes according to adjournmant at Tuesday, cMornkng, November 16th, 1926. convenes according to adjourn: 17 , In the Suverior Court, November Before the Cler, orning term of the Court d being heavd, Urnon appearand the Court ordered ation was made by the 1d vrosecute its action or it he vlaintiff failed WaRmR regu larly reathe decreed bv the Court Term of 1%! Superior iudge P MAARNAWENYIT ing before Referee 5 : +heirn AIALL ANE OO A ON OH ordered by thé notice with Stearns Brothers, o be ontstanding agains the Carolina No} parold In the Sunerior Court, Stone a cause why they should not te11 Coun Before the Clerk. be made orders heretofore made in Mekens and Fannie Dickers, th VS. A, McKlrov Presia ing J. € Nicho} son } 4 neard at this This Honorable Court eing at eard and b fourt takes a recess until This cause coming on to be h ° Nadnes © dav MoreEre: November 17th Pe. A McE1LPOY, » i926 at 9:50 otlook A, M, Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, 8 ee AG. Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that this cause has been Herts Judge Presitdirg ane ng Courts for the 15th Jndici District of North Caroliffa. ee ee Laie cca ee ee e ea erm nee nse Renna ee On ae ig} i 1 NOVEMBER TERM, 1926. Thirsday , November Iv, 1926. tofore referred + Pp. P. Dulin as Referee, and that said action is for the necovery of lands, and while said action was pending before said Referee, ang , cause was filed by said Referee, the said plaintiffs eafore 8 iv they had, and adjusted the matters by the Court that this Refere *» AY CC j t, {is further herebdyv dismi:s sed, jacreed that the plain- srdered th rk of this Mckir ey Cr ov ludve Presiding. © ” A ‘ nudge bess {di neg and-Hol for the 15th Judici of North Carolina. NOVEMBER TERM, 1926. 1 63 FRIDAY NOVEMBER 19, 1926. This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment, Friday Morning, November 19, at 9:30 o'clock A, M. for the dispatch of business, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, {Iredell County. November Term, 1926. W. 0. W. Lee, Plaintiff Vs. q; dio Sharps, Defendant Ist. Was plaintiff injured and damaged in his person and property by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. end, Did plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his injury and damage, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No. 3rd. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant? Answer: $4000. 4th, Was the defendant injured and damaged in his person and property by the negligence of the plaintiff, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No. 5th. Was the wife of the defendant,injured by the negligence of the plaintiff, as alleged in the answer? Answer: No. 6th. What damages, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover from the plaintiff? Answer: No. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926. W. 0. W. Lee, . v8, JUDGMENT R, L. Sharpe. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the court before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and His Honor having submitted and the jury having answered the issues as follows: 1. Was plaintiff injured and damaged in his person and property by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes" i 2. Did Plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his njury and damage, as alleged in the answer? Answer; "No." r 3. What damage, if any, 18 the plaintiff entitled to recove from the defendant? x : Answer: "$4000." i I i NT ic erent =sacoe-cpememeeiee eee 164 NOVEM BER TERM, 1926. FRIDAY NOVEMBER 19, 1926. 4. Was the defendant injured and damaged in his person and Pro. perty by the negligence of the plaintiff, as alleged in the answer? Answer: "No." 5. Was the wife of the defendant injured by the negligence of the plaintiff, as alleged in the answer? Answer: "No." 6. What damages, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover from the plaintiff? Answer: "No." IT IS THERKFOR* CONSIDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendant the sum of $4000.00, with interest thereon at the rate of 6% from the 8th day of November, 1926, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. P, A, McElroy Judge Presiding 4 ' vs. 4 \ R. L. Sharpe 4 The defendant moves to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, Motion overruled and defendant excepts judgment signed as appears in the record atd the defendant again excepts and anneals to the Supreme Court Notice of apneal given and waived in open Court. Apneal bond fixed at $50 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. P, P. Dulin, Receiver for Carolina Stone Company, vs. ORDER REFERRING CASE TO REFEREE ) 4 } I | 0 Stearns Brothers, Incorporated, This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the court and being heard, and it apneraring to the court that this controversy involves the taking of account between the plaintiff and defendant and that the parties have consented and agreed that the case be referred to Stable Lynn, Be. of , * Salisbury, North Carolina; EG 32 is, therefore, by eonsent considered, adjudged and decreed . a that Stable Lynn, Esq. of Salisbury, N. C be and he is hereby appointed Referee in this case to hear and determine all issues of fact and law arising on th e pleadings and to report hig findings of fact and conclusion of law Sq) Sp.gourt, subject to exceptions, according to the usual course of procedure in trials by Referee, P._A, McElroy By consent: Judge Presiding Lewis & ae Attorneys for Plaintiff Grier & Grier Attorneys for Defendant NOVEMBER TERM, 1926, FRIDAY NOVEMBER 19, 1926. North Carolina, In the Suvertor Court, Iredell County. E, Morrison, trading and doing business under the name and style of "Morrison Manufacturing Cempany" vs. J-.U DG.BRe' st Rosenbloom-Levy Company, INC, This cwuse coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the court before His Honor P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and the plaintiff through his counsel comes into cpen court and states that all matters of difference between the plaintiff and the defendant growing out of the matters and things alleged in the complaint and answer have been compromised by the defendant paying to the plaintiff the sum of THIRTY- FIVE HUNDRED ($3500.00) DOLTARS; and it further appearing to the court that said defendant has paid said amount and that the plaintiff ts to pay the cost of this action; It 1s, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing by reason of his writ and that the compromise be and the same is hereby confirmed and approved, and that the cost of this a ction be taxed against the vlaintiff. _ P. A. MceKlroy Judge Presiding North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredéll County. November Term, 1926. John M, Privette, vs. j JUDGMENT § S. G. Sloan i This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the court before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and being heard, and after the plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested, defendant moved for judgement as of non-suit, the Court being of the opinion that plaintiff failed to make out his case: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and he is hereby non-suited. It is further ordered and ad- judged that the cost of this action bé taxed against the plaintiff and his bondsman, G, I. Privette and T. L, Sharpe. P. A, McBlroy Judge Presiding 166 NOVEMBER TERM, 1926, PRIDAY NOVEMBER 19, 1926. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. N. P. Saey, Administrator of James Wright, Deceased, vs. JUDGMENT Mrs. Lila Dunavant Henkel, J. A. C. Wadsworth, L. P. Henkel, T. S. Coffey, H, J. Dunavant,Hanry A. Rhyne, and F} G, Harper, Executors of C. V. Henkelj deceased. i This caude coming on to be heard at this term of the court before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and being heard, and it aprearing to the court that the plaintiff and defendants have compromised and settled all matters in dispute between them growing out of the matters and things alleged in the compaaint on the following terms, to-wit: Defendants to pay plaintiff the sum of FOUR HUNDRED $$400.00) DOLLARS in full settlement and satisfaction of all of plaintiff's claims and demands in said action, and the cost of this action to be taxed bv the Clerk of the Court: and it further appearing that the defendants have paid the plaintiff the sum so agreed upon and the plaintiff has accepted thesame; It si, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by reason of his writ and that said compromise be and the same i shereby adjudged binding upvén all the parties, and that defend- ants pay the cost of this actton to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. ; P. A. McElroy Avvroved: Judge Presiding Thurman Leatherwood Attorney for Plaintiff Grier & Grier _ Attorneys for Defendants North C arolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926, MORRISON MANUFACTURING COMPANY Vs. 3 JUDGMENT CENTRAL DRUG COMPANY GLENN YODER COLEY R. YODERY and others, i 4 This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor P, A. McElroy Jud ; udge, at the November Termy 1926, of Iredell County Superior Court, and it appearing to the court that the matters and things involved in this action have b Yr ave Seen compromised and settled by and between the parties hereto, for ’ whe sum of four Hundred and Seventy-Pive ($475.00) Dollars. and enete. of ? action: IT Is Is THER FOR &, Considered, ordered and adjudged, that the ® - , laintiff a ve Vv f f ed and p o ha and recover of the defendants the sum of Four Hyndred Seventy Five ($475.00) Dollars . : ’ which said sum is in full of all matters and together taxed by the clerk of this court P. &. ugzlnoy BY CONSENT: Grier & Grier — ee Attorneys for laintirgr R. L. Huff _ man Attorney for Defendants things involved in th this cause, with the costs of this action, to be ? NOVEMB2R TERM, 1926, FPRIBAY NOVEMBER 19, 1926. North Carolina, Ih the Superior Court, Iredell County.- November Term, 1926. Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co., V8 T&S U2 Ss Winston Furniture Company. 1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: Yes. If so what amount? $382.45 with interest from September 15, 1926. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926. Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co., VS. T.8 8.U8 s Gastonia Furniture Co, 1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff as alleged in” the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. If so, in what amount? Answer: $224.61 and interest from Nov. 18, 1926. 3. Is the plaintiff indebted to the defendant on account of the counter-claim as set out in the answer? Answer: No. 4. If so, in what amount? Answer: This Honorable Court takes a recess until Saturday Morning, November 20, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, 10ge Pres ng an for the 15th Jydicial of North Carolina NOVEMBER TERM, 1926, SATURDAY NOVEMBER 20, 1926. Tis Honorabké Court convenes according to ajournmant, Saturday Morning, November 20, at 9:30 o'clock A. M, for the dispateh of business, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926, Mary Alexander, VS. sUDGR Aa FT P. P. Dulin, Administrator of R. T. Weatherman, Deceased. This cause coming on to be heard and being @®eached in the regular call of the calendar, and the plaintiff failing to appear, the Court ordered proclamation to be mede, whereupon proclamation was made in open court and the plaintiff failed to answer and to appear and pro- secute her said action: IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff be and she is hereby non-suited. It is further ordered that the costs of this be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of this Court, P, A, McElroy Judge Presiding North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term 1926, Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co., 6 4 VS. JUDGMENT { Gastonia Furniture Company. This cause coming on to be heard at the November Term of Iredell Supertor Court before HisHonor, P. A, McElroy, Judge Presiding, and the jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as follows, to-wit: d P 4 . 1. Is the defendant indebted to the Plaintiff, ss alleged in the compadaint? Answer: Yes, 2. If so, in what amount? Answer: $224.61 and interest from Nov. 18th, 1926 5. Is the plaintiff indebtea to the defendant on account of the counter-claim, ss set out in the answer? Answer: No, ae 8, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of th le e defendant the sum of $224.61, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 % per annum for Nov, 18th, 1926, until paid and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court This Nov, 1@th, 1926, PA, McRlroy “Tudge Prettinag— NOVEMBER TER®, 1926. SATURDAY .NOVW BER 20, 1926. North Carolina, In the Superior Cow t, Iredell County. November Term, 1926. Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co.,} v8. JUDGMENT Winston Furniture Company. This cause coming on to be heard at the November Term of Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and the jury, and the jury having answered the issue submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as follows: 1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? If so, in what amount? Answer: . Yes. $382.45 with interest from Sept. 15th, 1926. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaimtiff recover of the defendant in this action the sum of $382.45, with interest from the 15th day of September, 1926, until paid at the rate of 6% per annum, It is further ordered that the plaintiff recover of the defend- ant the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Nov. 19th, 1926. P, A. McElroy Jydge Prsi ai ng North Carolina, In the Sunrericor Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926. Beatrice Wormly vs. JUDGMENT Pomp Dobson This cause combhng on to be heard at the November Term of the Superior Cort before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, judge presiding: and the jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows: "). Did the defendant made a verbal sontract with the plaintiff to convey the lot upon which the plaintiff's house is located to her, if she would build a house on it, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2, Did the plaintiff, in the bona fide belief that she was the equitable owner of said lot, place improvements thereon? Answer; Yes. 3. If so, what is the value of said improvements? Answer: $1054.50." It is, therefore; ordered, considered and adjudged that the Plaintiff have and recover of the defendant in this actbon the sum of $1054.50, with interest from Nov. 8th, 1926, until paid at the rate of 6% per annum, or if the plaintiff so elect, instead of interest, the free rental of the premises so long as she occupies the same until the principal of this fudgment is paid. 170 NOVI BER TERM, 1926, SATURDAY .NOVMEBER 20, 1926. It is further ordered and adjudged that the said judgment shal) be and is alien upon the house and lot occupied by the plaintiff am ddscri pag in the complaint which lot is situated in Rabbit Town, being of the dimensions of 80 ft. by 100 ft. and located on Dobson Avenue, adjoining the lands of Lee Dobson and being the lot upon which the plaintiff, Beatrice Wormly, erected her house, said lien to date from July 8th, 1926, the thés action was insti- tued. It js further ordered that the plaintiff recover the costs of thisaction to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 19th day of November, 1926, P, A. McElroy Judge Presiding North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926, State Ex Rel E. H, Miller, Plaintiff by leaveof Court allowed to amend fuardian of Wilma Milier, the fifth paragraph of this complaint tm£tto Plaintiffs insert after the figures $2766.86 4nd the last line of said psragraph the words, "and VS. which he wrongfully converted to his own use and benefit." J. Me. Connelly and National Surety Company of New York, Defendants North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926. State Ex Rel E. H. Miller, Guarci an of Wilma Miller, Plaintiffs vs. J. M. Connelly and National Surety Company of New York, Def endants 1. Was J, M. Connelly removed as - M. 1 y remove guardian of Wilma Mqller b the Surertor Court of Iredell County and pleitirf appointed dnaal ae for ome Wilma Miller, as alleged in the compaaint? bias Answer: Yes, ia rye pyeid the defendant, J. M. er, receive funds belonging to his and if'so, in whet amount, © “814 Connelly, as guardian of Wilma ward, asalleged in the compaaint Answer: Yes, $3228.66 5. If so, did saia J M own use and benefit and refuse to pay ey atleged in the complairt? nelly convert said moneys to his ame over to the plaintiff, as Answer: Yes, 4. Are th hi seine einente © defendants tndebted to the Plaintiffs, and if so, Answer: Yes, $2766.86, with com 1925 until pata, paund interest from June 3, NOVEMBER TERM, 1986 SATURDAY NOVEMBER 20, 198s, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926. State Ex Rel E, H. Miller, Guardian of Wilma Miller, V8 JUDGMENT J. M. Connelly and National Surety Company of New York. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and peing heard before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the Court having submitted and the jury having answered the issmes set out in the record as follows: 1. Was J. M. Connelly removed as guardian of Wilma Mjller by the Superior Court of Iredell County and plaintiff appointed guardian for said Wilma Miller, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes" 2. Did the defendant, J. M. Connelly, as guardian of Wilma Miller, breceive funds belonging to his said ward, asalleged in the com- plaint, and if so, in what amount? Answer: "Yes, $3228.66." 3. If so, did said J, M, Connelly convert said moneys to his own use and benefit and refuse to pay the same over to the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Tee." 4. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff and if so, in what amount? Answer: “Yes, $2766.86, with compound interest from June 3, 1925, until paid." IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED AND ADJ 'DGED that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendant, J. M. Connelly as principal and National Surety Company as surety, the sum of $3500, to be discharged upon the payment of $2766.86, with compound interest thereon from June 3, 1925, until] paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. It is further ordered that execution issue against the property of the defendant, J. M. Connelly, for the satisfaction of this judgment and if the execution shall be returned Unsatisfied, that execution then issue against the persen of said J. M. Connelly. P. A. McElroy Judge Presiding ce Re sree eer meee eee ee 2A 24- 25 8 26= 27= 47= 48~= 54- Statesville Lumber VO. v8 N. G NOVEMBER TERM 1926. SAPURDAY NOVEMBER 20, 1926. G. F. Mills vs Mooresville Cotton Mills, Inc., -=- Continued. Ida Head vs Paul Baker. --= Continued by consent. Mrs Beda Ost vs Ellen Nilsson --- Continued. Deht Turner vs Huffman Motor Co. --- Continued. J. W. Redman et al vs Janie Sowers. --- Continued by consent, N. D. Turner, Admr. vs W. E. Selby. --- Continued by consent. General Motors Acceptance Corp. et al., vs C M Miller. --~ Continued, L. Alice Hayes, Admrs \¥ L Carpbell vs Columbus Campbell.--=- Continued Vrs Louise Hayes vs Columbus Campbell. --=- Continued, Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville vs D 4 Beam and L A Beam. -~ Continued J H McElwee vs Hutton and Bourbannias Co. --- Continued. A. H. Feller vs Charlie Hicks and wife. --=- Continued. Statesville Lumber Uo. vs K L Church and G S Grant. Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs Epps Harris and Ed Nicholson. Continued James C Davis, Director General of Railway vs Cleveland Mfg Co. Continued, James Davis,Director Generaa of Kaillway ve statesville Veneer Co.-« Continued. LB Hollar vs Jesse Miller. --= Continued. Statesville Lumber Go. vs L W Westmoreland, --- Continued. tatesville Lumber Co. vs N G Holres et al. --- Continued. Statesville /umber Co. vs Dorsett Fraley et al --- Continued, Statesville lumber Uo. vs N. G. Holmes ect al. Centinued. Mrs M E Westmoreland vs J. A. Wesbmoreland. «-- Continued. J. A. Westmoreland vs Mrs M. E. Westmoreland, -<- Continued. « HOimes 6¢ €1, =--« Contthnued. 61 Hillard summers vs Gertrude Summers. «-- Continued, 66= 156= 1359= 157- 160- 162- 173= 180- 198- 199= 214= 226= 255= 257. Bank of stony roint vs D D Littlejohn et al, --- Continued. C. B. Freeze vs Nrs John L. Lowe, nj. Continued, W. W. McGowan et al vs Walter Beckham et al, <-- Continued, T D Shuford vs W R Hart and Summers and Mcsuley and Stearns Bros. Inc. W. C. Moore vs DG Wilson, -a« Contaimid: Continued. Hazel Uline rierce vs Herman rierce, -«- Continued Dalley Carter vs James Carter, #-.- Continued Statesville Lumber Co. vs J 7 Chappell and Alice Chappell. A. S. Alley vs -- Continued. JA Perry andc a Hartline.--- Contimued. A. S. Alley vs CA Hartline and J a Perry. <<- Continued, Carl Mathis vs Cleo Mathis, «.. Continued T. N. Brown vs R L Church, --.. Continued, J H Shuford vs Murdock Caaty 66. sue Continued Woré. Orr vs T p Biller, oan Continued NOVMEBER TERM 1926. SATURDAY NOVEMBER 20, 1926. 262- J C Brookshire ws McQueen Fours and wife. --- Continued. ig Extr.,of W F Nesbit ve W F Smith, et al---Continued. oB1l- J O Gaither vs Statesville Lumber Co. --- Continued. 282- Celeste Billingsley, et al vs City of Statesville. Continued. 285- J G Shelton vs Hand Medicine Co. --- Continued. 286- A. L. Watts vs Hand Medicine Co. --- Cont*nued. 287~ W. D. Turner vs Hand Medicine Co. --- Continued. — Smith et al vs Mrs O.L. Turner. -#=- Continued. 307- Kincaid nad Barger vs Noah Bryant, eta. --- Continued. sy North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1926, mm This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at the November term of Superior Court of Iredell County 1926 before His Honor P, A. MckKlrog Judge Presiding, An $+ pDne Sng / , 21)" + nd it appearing to the court that the Plaintiff and the defend- ant have settled their differences and that it is agreed by the defendant that he is due the plaintiff the sum of $2029.47 with interest from this date and the cost of this action to be taxed by the court; : vil& 9 . And it appearing to the court that the Plaintiff has agreed not to issue execution on this Judement for a period of four months drom this date; + : it ie therefore, ordered and adjudged by the court that the plain- tiff recover of the defendant the sum of “2029.47 with interest from this @ sate; t : Sate; the sodt of this action to be taxed by the court: and it is further ade yr h - + judged that execution he not issued on this judgment for a period of four yomths,. Approved: ~_2s A. McElroy Judge Presiding —’. A. Bristol _ Attorney for plaintiff Lewis *_Lewis Attorneys for defenjants North Carolina, ) In the Suneri or Court, Iredell County ) Snider Bros. w. H. Davis and J. S. Marshall | t VS. 0 JUDGMENT 4 { ' This cause coming on to be heard before J, A. Hartness, C. 8S. C., and being heard and it appearing that the summons and copy of the complaint were served on the defendants on Oct. 11, 1926 and that a verified conv of the complaint was filed on Oct. 1, 1926 and that more than 20 days have gone by since the service of the summons and complaint and that no answer has been filed and it further appearing that the claim is on a note and stated account. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $424.51 with interest on $64.51 from Aug. 19, 1925 and on $360.00 from Oct. 1, 1924 at six per cent per annum and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk be paid by the defendants. Monday, Nov. 8, 192 J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court OK CYC ME 4a CHVO LGC (HOA (CL LCL CLGEGEC North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) King Bros. Shoe Company, a corporation, VS. JUDGMENT ~, B. Adams This cause coming on to be heard unon the records and pleadings, and it arpearing therefrom that the defendant has been duly served and summoned and has no demurrer or answer to the complaint, although the time for filing such pleadings has elapsed; and it further apnearing from the duly verified complaint that this action is brought to recover a specified amount upon an instrument for the payment of monev only, the said instrument being a note, And it further appearing to the court that this day being a Monday in the month of Nuvember, 1926, to-wit, the 4th Monday in the ssid month, Hereupon it is considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Two hundred Fifty-eight and 86/100 Dollars, vrine Cipal, with interest on the ssid sum from the lst day of March, 1924, until and paid, and for cost expended in this action to be taxed by the clerk, This the 22nd day of November, 1926. J. A, Hartness ON set a @ierk Suverior Court tredell County. QO0C CAE HQ@Oe GAQLEG@ 176 Ata North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Commercial Credit Company V8. JUDGMENT od, Lb, Plerce This cause coming on to be heard before the underel net Clerk of the « Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it apnearing to the Court that on the 8th day of October, 1926, plaintiff procured a summons to be issued against the defendant, returnable on the 19th dav of October, 1926, and that ssid sumnons, together with a copy of the complaint, was duly served on the defendant on the 8th dav of October, 1926; andit further appearing that ae cotangent ene De i Re rent a Se this 1s an action on a note to recover the amount due thereon and which the ——— defendant has failed to pay, to-wit, $241.67, with interest fror May 2end, {t further appearing that more than twenty days have elapsed since es of service of summons and copy of complaint in this action on the int, and that the defendant has fai.ed to anpear and answer or demurr verified complaint of the plaintiff; and it further appearing to the Court that defendant is now due and owing the plaintiff the sum of $24167 y Sntanea » - ‘y , ¢ 2 ‘\ - with interest thereon at the rate of six ver cent per annum from May 22r4, ", Considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of TO HUNDRED FORTY-ONE and 67/100 ($241.67) nr en Nee eee Ss Se Oe : i } DOT, RS ; } y apes } . . . POLLARS with interest thereon from the 2¢nd dav of May, 1926 at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed bv the Clerk of the Court. 4 « " 7 1A x J This the 2nd day f November, 1926, J, A. Hartness Clerk Sunerior Court Lredell Co. North Carolina, ) ) a Iredell County, ) ne Abe Supe Amey Carolina Motor Gonpany, a Corporation VS. IDGVENT P JUDGVENT FINAL BEFORE THE CLERK ON A NOTE H. C. Hunter and Emma Hunte Yn VIMME 1 ST and KB, E. Harmon, This cause 44 ause com'ng on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Suverio , , sala . or Court of Iredell] County on Monday, Nov, 22nd, 1926, and being heard, ’ , ; . and it anpearing to the Court that the plaintiff in this action caused summons to be issued from the Clerk of the Sunerior Court of Tredell Connty on the 2nd dav of October, 1926, against the defendants and that personal service of et mons was made on all of the defendants by leaving with ther a copy of the summons and a copy of the Phaintiff's verified complaint prior to thé return date mentioned in the summons: oe And it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Court on the end day of October, 1926, and that this is a cause of action upon a proe- missory note for a amount certain and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the service of said summons and verified complaint on each and all of the said defendants, and more than twenty days have elapsed from the return dabenamed in the sumrons ard thet the defendants have not filed any answer denying the complaint or raising anv issue of flact and it appearing to the court that the rlaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendants the sum of $200.00, with interest from Bec. 9th, 1925, at the rate of 6% per annum, until paid on account of snid note; It is,*therefore, ordered and adiudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendants in this action the sum of $200.00, with interest thereon at 6% from Dec. 9th, 1925, until paid and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This Nov. 22nd, 1926. _ Jd. A. Hartness a Clerk Superior Court. @ (QLQOAMONN (AG KAAUA Bake fo CHYOLG@ @ @ @ J Y i Sr S "for Court North Carolina, In the Superior Court, ’ Ref e the Cler [redell County. aL Ore vi Ke Statesville Lumber Company, orporuted,. VS. Initer G. Kirkman and Andrew A, indsay, trading and doing business nder the firm name and style of fon FrameCompany, and «. *& L. {tyre Bon nany, 4 cor" orattor + aoe or es oc me necheard before the Clerk, and it This cause coming on to 5 } } tf ona afandants have compromised uring to the Court that the vlaintiff anc defendants Nave ' 2fan y+ ave paia tre vlatnege settled thebr differences, and that the defendants have paic € lain rag se h no cnme in ourt ore the sum agreed upon, and the plat t4ff having come into Court bef« vermission to take a voluntary non-suit; the Clerk and requested ordered and adjudged by the Court that the IT IS, TH#RKFORK, said defendant to be taxed with \A plaintiff be and it 1s hereby non-sulted; the costs of this action. This the 13th day of December, 1926. Le J, A. Hartness “Terk Superior Court Tredell County ——— ee ee CAO OAXAMK QA OMMICAAVa 8 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Apostolos Georgion vs, James, Piperis, doing business under the firm name and style u of New York Cafe. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Sunerior Court of Iredell County and being heard on this, Monday, December 20th, 1926, and it anvearing to the court that on the 135th day of November, 1926, the plaintiff procured a summons in this action to be issued against the defendant, returnable on the 23rd day of November, 1926, and at the same time filed with the court a verified complaint; and it further anvear- ing that plaintiff caused said summons, toge ther with a copy of the com- plaint, to be served on the defendant, and that service of said summons and copy of the complaint was duly made on the defendant on November 15th, 1926; and it further annearing that this is an action against the def mdant for breach of an express contract to pay a sum certain, to-wit: the sum of $500.00 evidenced by two checks of the defendant in the sum of $250.00 each, dated the 12th day of October, 1926; and it further appearing that the de- fendahb ha failed to apnear and answer or demur to the verified complaint duly filed as aforesaid, and still fails to appear and answer or demur to said complaint; and {it further appearing that the time for defendant to an- swer, demur or plead to said action has expired; It is, therefore, consi dered andadjudged by the Court that plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of FIVE HUNDRED ($500.00) DOLLARS, with interest thereon fiom the 12th day of October, 1926, at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, together withthe cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, This Monday, December 20th, 1926, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County. CL ORAOOQEAGE CH@@CQGE CLACQLERE@ 179 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Lazenby Montgomery Hardware Company, t ' versus 4 t ' Y. 8. White and B,. M. Wilhelm THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on this MONDAY, the 20th day of December, 1926, and it avnvearing to the Court., that the summons was issued on the 24th day of November, 1926, and returnable the siuth of December, 1926, and that said Summons and a copy of the complaint were served on the defendants, November 24th, 1926, and that the complaint was filed November, 24th, 1926, which complaint was duly verified, and the cause of action there- in stated was based upon a prdémissory note under seal, duly executed by the defendants Y, 8. White as principal and B, M. Wilhelm as endorser, and that there is due on said note sued on the sum of $256.30 with interest on $243.69 from the 24th day of November, 1926 until paid, and that no part of said note has been paid, and thet no answer has been filed in said cause, IT IS THER&FORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that the plaintiff have judgment by default, and that the plaintiff the Lazenby Montgomery Hard- ware Company, recover of the defendant Y. 5S. White as principal, and B, M, Wilhelm as endorser, the sum of $256.30 with interest from the 24th day of November, 1926 until paid, and the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 20th day of December, 1926, J, A, Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court @EOERKLUCERE@EOH@ME @QQQEARC@R™ 189 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Beforethe Clerk, Iredell Upholstered Furniture Company, a Corporation vs. NOTE BBFORE CLERK, ' é b JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL ON Winston Furniture Company ‘ This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on Monday, January rd, 1927, and being heard upon the evidence offered by the plaintiff, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued by the Clerk of the Suverior Court of Iredell County on November 23rd, 1926, and was personally served nvon the defendant on Nov. 26th, 1926, by leaving a copy of the summons and the plaintiff's verified complaint with the defendant. And it appearing to the Court that this is an action for the re- covery of three promissory notes for an amount certain given by the defendant to the vlaintiff and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the sum- mons and verified complaint were served upon the defendant, the plaintiff having filed it s verified complaint in this office on the 23rd day of November, 1926, and that the defendant has failed to file any answer with- in twenty davs from the date of the service of said summons and complaint uvon it, raising any issue of fact between the plaintiff and defendant. And it appearing to the Court that the defendant is justly indebt- ed to the plaintiff for the vavment of three promissory notes eet out in the complaint, aggregating the sum of $287.63, including accrued interest to Nov. 23rd, 1926, +% is; therefore, ordered and adfudged that the plaintiff recover . of the defendant the sum of $287.63, with interest on said amount at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 33rd Gay of Nov., 1926, until paid and that the plaintiff recover the costs of this action This January 3rd, 4927, __dJ. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County @erexe QQQe@¢ Ka yafuya Acsasa (axa CRE > CLEOQ@ @C@@CE COQQAEEEOh C@O@@ et: North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Ir a@ell County. Acme Packing Company § A vs. : JUDGMENT { Ballance-Sullivan Co. This cause coming on to be heard on Monday, January 3rd, 1927, and it apvearing to the Court that the summons and verified com- plaint were duly served on the defendant on the 11th day of December, 1926, and it further appearing that the defendant has failed to answer or demur to the complaint in twenty days, allowed by law and by the terms of the summons, and it further appearing that the action is _in- situted upon an account for goods sold and delivered, a verified, item- ized statement of the account being attached to the complaint and that the amount demanded is Two Hundred Ninety Two Dollars and Fifty cents, with interest from the 10th day of August, 1926. It is now, upon motion of the plaintiff, ordered and ad- judged that the plaintiff, Acme Packing Company, recover from the de- fendant, Ballance-Sullivan Company, the sum of Two Hundred Ninety Two Dollars and Fifty cents with interest from the 10th day of August, 1926, and the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk. MCAMDAODEGAVAC HAE MXAAVQQQ@ @QEOAROGERFAXCE OE poner ile Satna nin. tas ly is. song er ernn 182 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Incorporated. vs. H. C. Holland This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Suverior Court of Iredell County, and being heard on this, Monday, January 10th, 1927, and it anvearing to the Court that on the Srd day of November, 1926, plaintiff caused to be issued a summons in the above entit led case against the defendant to the Sheriff of Wilkes County, and at the same time filed in the office of the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court a veri- fied complaint; that the summons so issued to the Sheriff of Wilkes County was duly returned "Defendant not to be found in my County;" whereupon plaing tiff procured an alias summons to be issued on November 20th, 1926 to the Sheriff of Guflford County, and that said summons, together withcopy of the complaint, was duly served on the defendart on December 6th, 1926; and it further appearing that this is an action against the defendant for breach of an express contract to pay a sum certain, to-wit, the sum of $990.00, evidenced by the written contract of the defendant, and that said sum draws interest from December 15th, 1925 at the rate of siz per cent per annum; snd it further appearing that the defendant failed to appear and answer or demur to the verified complaint Guly filed in the office of the undersigned Clerk as aforesaid, and still fails to enpear and answer or demur to said complaint; and it further appearing that the time for @efendant to answer or demur to said action’has expired, It is therefore considered, adgudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of NINE HUNDRED AND NINETY* ($990.00) DOLLARS, with interest thereon from December 15th, 1925 at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, together with thecost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court This, Monday, January 10th, 1927, J. A, Hartness erk Superior Cort Lredell County CEM LE R0CEOREERCRELOCO@EEEA COROEROC®EEHROMREEEE North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, R,. L. Shuford vs. M. S. Brawley, Admrx. of the Estate of R. V. Brawley Tis cause coming on to be heard, and bein g heard before J. A. Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, the 17th day of January, 1927, and it apvearing to the Court that all matters in con- troversy have been adjusted and settled as follows, to-wit: The defendant is to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $400.00 money collected on Foster note, same to allowed as a preferred claim, and the further sun of $1350.00 as a general claim; and the defendant the balance of the costs in this action: $+ 4s therefore by consent of the plaintiff and the defendant order- ed and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff dochave ané-rnécover of the defendant the sum of $400.00 money collected from Foster note as a preferred claim, and the further sum of $1350.00 as a general claim, and the unpaid costs of this action are to be paid by defendant. And it is further adinudged by consent that said $400.00 be applied to as a payment on mortgage deed held by defendant against plaintiff, and so much of the remaining $1350.00 as is paia on same as a general creditor to be first applied to the balance of the payment of said mortgage deed, and the remaining part, if any, to be paid plaintiff. This January 17th, 1927. By Consent: W. C, Fefimster Attorney for Plaintiff J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court P. P. Dulin Iredell County. Lewis & Lewis Attorneys for Defendant @ABBQEAAABA@AO * CCMPOOAABMNGA* CO @ PRABEAQ@QAQTOCARCQOAUA @ CQQAQC@ ee a ee RS eR EE enn BT CntnE eS SSSR mR ee ago Se ee re ee eee ssiessst>ieshliachaitie ditentineemdligecerintmntinn<tesmsmatsesianiapiinanesdjapannicia EER = mn ae nen Wer ayn tr nner eC re ee ae 184 North Carolina or ’ In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Doggett Motor Sales Co, Parters, H. H. Doggett, B. B. Dorgzett and J. H. Thomas, trading as Doggett Motor Sales Co. vs. JUDGMENT A, F. Overcash This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under-~ signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, January 17th, 1927, and it apnvearing to the Court that summons was issued on December 17th, 1926 in this action and served on December 27th, 1926, by reading and delivering a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint on the defendant: and it further apnearing to the Court that a duly veri- fied complaint was filed in said cause on the 20th day of December, 1926; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Four Fundred and seventy-six & 65/100 Dollars, together with interest from November 8th, 1926 at the rate of 6% per annum until paid; and it further appearing that said amount is evidenced by a promissory note executed bv the deferdant to the plaintiff, the terms of which note are set out in the verified complaint filed in this cause; and it demurred thereto in the time allowed by law: It ts therefore ordered and adjudged that the vlaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Four Hundred and seventy-six &65/100 ($476.65) Dollars together with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from No. 8th, 1926 until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed by this court against the defendant, _ J, A, Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court. This 17th dav of January, 1927, On@M MAMA MAMIOR MARR Omen ACMUdewmmeae® OO) North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, J. B. Colt Company, a Corporation V8. JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL M. J. Jurney BEFORE THE CLERK, This cause coming on -to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on Monday, January 17th, 1927, and it appear- ing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 22nd day of September, 1926 and served personally on the defendant on the 25th day of Sept. 1926, and that this is an action upon a promissory note given by the defendant to the plaintiff for an amount certain and that the defendant has not filed anv answer or pleading within twentv davs from the date of the ser- vice unon him of the summons-and covy of the verified complaint, or within twenty days after the return date named in said summons, by which 4 question of fact is raised for the determination of the jury. And it appearing to the Court that the def mdant is indebted to the plaintiff on account of said promissory note, in the amount of $389.05, with interest thereon fror the lst day of Nov. 1926, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recovér of the defendant in this action the sum of $389.05, with interest from Nov. lst, 1926, until paid and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 17th day of Jan. 1927. J. A. Hartness yak Gierk Superior Court Iredell County. RAGQEQOCMECOCHOROCAQ@DEE C@CCBEOCQQCOO@ Cae North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Rubv Haves and L. E. Haves versus JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL. Tom Hall This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, before J. A, Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court, AND it appearing that summons was issued age ainst the defendant on the 6th day of December, 1926 and served on said defendant the 6th dav of December, 1926 and that the complaint in said action was auly filed and verified, and that the Plaintiff's cause of action was founded upon two notes under seal, executed by the defendant, one dated the Ath dav of June, 1926 for $35.82 and one date the 22nd day of May, 1926 for $53.56, making a total together with interest of $92.30, which amount {s dune and vavable to the plaintiffs: AND IT FURTHER APPEARING TO THE COURT, that at the time of the execution of the notes aforesaid the defend- ant executed chattel mortgages on certain property therein specified to secure the vavment of said notes, which were duly probated and recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, N. C.; and that ancillary proceeding were taken in this action for the possession of the property therein specified in said chattel mortgages, and that the defend- ant replevied and gave an undertaking in the sum of $200.00 with G,. C. Kimball as surety, and it further appearing to the Court, that the defend- ant has failed to answer said complaints IT IS THER“FORK CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED, that the plaintiff have judgment arainst said defendants by default for want of an answer, and it is further ordered that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, thé sum of Ninety Two Dollars and Thirty Oents, with interest on $89.48 the principal, from the 6th day of December, 1926, until peid and the cost of action to be taxed by the Clerk, IT 13 PURTH CONSIDERED and ADJUDGED that the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the corn, raised on the lands of the Carpnbell Farm,one jersey milch cow, named 'LIL', age four years and if possession cannot be had, then for the value of the property, to-wit the sum of $92.48, and 18 is furth adjudged that the plaintiff recover on the defendants replevv bond against the defendant Tor Hall and his surety G. C, Kimball, the sum of One Hundred ak an ight Five Dollars, to be discharged upon the surrender of the mortgaged propert perty aforesaid to the plaintiff, and if the surrender of saidproperty 1s not eiv » : given, that the judgment aforesaid against the defendant and his surety on the repl plevy bond be discharged upon the pavment of the judgment aforesaid against the defendant Tom Hall, , of $92.30, together with interest and cost of action, This MONDAY, the 17th day of January, 1927, _J. A, Hartness = _-..-—=— Clerk Supertor Court Tredell County, N. C. North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. B, A. Troutman, R. W. Troutman, C. A. Troutman and L. L. Troutman, partners tradingsas the Mooresville Furniture Co. vs. JUDGMENT Ss, H. Anderson, L. H, Melchor, J. P. Cavin and Mrs. Marv Jane Hobbs This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, January 24th, 1927, and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on Jan. lst, 1927 and served on Jan. 3rd, bv reading and delivering a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint on each of the ddfendants; and it further appearing to the Court that a duly verified conplaint was filed in said cause on the 3rd day of January, 1927; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Five Hundred Dollars, together with interest from Oct. 2, 1925 at the rate of 6% per annum until paid; and it further apvear- ing that said amount is evidenced by 4 promissory note executed by the defendants to the plaintiff, the terms of which note are set out in the verified complaint filed in this cause; and it further apvearing that the defendant has not filed an answer or demurrer in the time allowed by law; It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, S. H. Anderson, L. H. Melchor, J, P. Cavin, and Mrs, Mary Jane Hobbs, the sum of Five Hundred Dollars with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from Oct. 2, 1925 until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed bv this Court against the defendants, J. A. Hartness Gierk Superior Court This 24th day of January, 1927. @QEOCOCECAE COQEEOWO TY @ak Uakataral AH Na ceertemeeemmee ee nna bei 188 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, J. B, Cooper, trading and doing business as J. B, Cooper Motor Company. t V8. J U D GMENT J. R. Ramsey This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on Monday, the lst day of February, 1926, and it apvearing to the Court that the summons was issued in this action on the 24th day of December, 1925, and served on said defendant by personal service on the 25th dav of December, 1925, and that said action is an action to collect the onan’ due on note and open acoount, being certain stated amounts, and that said complaint was filed duly verified on the 4th day of January, 1926, and that the amount due plaintiff by defendant is $679.00 with interest from the 17th day of January, 1924, and the sum of $47.87 with interest from the Slst day of July, 19235, and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file an answer or demur withing the time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered anda adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $679.00 together with int- erest thereon at the rate of six ver cent per annum from January 17, 1924, until paid, and the further sum of $47.87 together with interest thereon at the rote of six per cent ver annum from the Slst day of July, 1923, until paid, and it &s further ordered and adjudged by the Court thatthe defendant pay the costs of this action, This February lst, 1926, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County. # AMINA UM A AYA, W(afafay Kahu Kah afaX Dasara : @:@:@:@:@:@ @:@:@:@: @ 189 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, ° JANUARY TERM, 1927. MONDAY MORNING, JANUARY 31, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1927. Be bt pemembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the 5th Monday béforethe first Monday in March., 192% the same being the Thirty-first day of January, 1927 A, D., when and where His Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the 15th Judie cial District, Spring Term 1927, is present and presiding,ianéhHonorablé Zeb, Vv. Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and return- ed into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term of the Superior Court, to-wit: The following were drawn and sworn as Grsnd-Jurors for the-term: J, A, Perry, C. H Hit try Knox, J. R. Allison, W. R. Whitener, W. W. Nixon, T, Ross Alexander, J, P. Brawley, L. L. Sherrill, G. S. Day, L. S. Scott, J. M. Rash, C. W, Smith, Cc. & Shoemaker, Z. C. Robémson, A. L. Feimster, W. H, Horton, J. D. Beaver, and G. G. Ludwig. C. H, Knox was appointed and sworn as foreman of the Grandjury. O. B. Lazenby was appointed as officer of the grand-jury. M .V. Dobson, S. @, Swann, and R. M. C. Morrow were returned not to be fon found in Iredell County. C, L. Rhyne, J. H. Howard, J. Frank Campbell, and C. H, Beaver were ex- cused for lawful causes, The following were drawn and sworn as vetty jurors for the week: J, F. Johnson, D. B. Stearns, H. C. Sharpe, R. L. Morrison, W. H. Ifnker;,¥. S. Sharpe, Roy A. Dingler, W. W. Kerr, T. T. Walker, and I, J. Alexander, A, F. Deal and Robt. Cloer were sworn as talesman jurors, No. 53 FALSE PRETENSE State Continued under former order, vs. R, 0, Kyles No. 60 GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS, State Continued urder former order, vs. R. 0, Kyles No. 79 TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. State Alias Capias. vs. Robert Williams No. 106 TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. State Alias Capias. vs, Robert Ruff | : : | j i t au i 4 | | ei | | | aE ee as 190 No. 154 State vs. Will Walson No. 175 State vs. Vance Huffman No. 176 State vs. Fate Huffman No. 176% State vs. Clay Holland No. 178 State va John Richie No. 198 State vs Kilmer Miiler Wo. 214 State ve J. E. Johnson Ho. 215 State vs Lewis Campbell No, 221 State vs Hal. W. Walker No, 222 State vs Carl Jackson — << ee nt ee a ne a A ee ce JANUARY TERMZ 1927. MONDAY, JANUARY 31, 1927. FALSE PRETENSE Nol Prossed with Leave, TO APPEAR AND SHOW THAT HE HAS PAID THE Cost, The defendant appeared and showed that h® had paid the cost. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be discharged, TO APPEAR AND SHOW THAT HE HAS PAID THE COST, The defendant appeared and showed that he had paid the cost, It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be discharged. TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR The defendant through his counsel, Mr. Rousseau, waives bill charging the unlawful possession of intoxe icating liquors and transporting intoxicating liquors for the purposes of sale, and pleads guilty. It appearing to the Court that the defendant is now in the Federal pehitentiary in Atlanta and also that his car has been seized and sold for approximately $2000. which amount has been turned over to the school fund, upon recommendation of the Solicitor judgment is suspended upon payment of the cost. Also Sct Fa, No. 5, State vs, Clay Holland, and B, Benton, Judgment absolute, to be dicharged upon the —s. of the cost, provided the cost is paid within ve days. TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD KEHAVIOR. Continued under former order, LARCENY Alias Capias LARCENY Nol Prosed "ith Leave LARCENY Canias and Continued, FALSE PRETENSE Alias Capias and Continued, DRIVEN y ~ AT ORS PTE ABIDE, ANF TUEWCR OF LIQUOR. ines # Jury No.l afte . 7 to open Court and pleads gop guilty return a verdict of sukike” . empannelled for their verdict, vo 4 wee under the influence of aeeniae car On pen ee judged by the Court that the defendant 4 in the common 3 ) fail of I e of TWELVE MONTHS, and assigneZ to wonk be partielea said county for said period. Not to wear stripes. No. 222% State vs Carl Jackson No. 224 State No, 227 State vs Chal Plyler Fred Plyler MO. ce State vs Laner Campbell No. 223 State v8 Carl Eller Joe Brooks Eugene Lewis Everett Lewis 4 4 vs j SapsctlsiSanreroy } ‘ Rt A ES ES IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM 1927 MONDAY JANUARY 51, 1927. ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads not guiltx Jury No. 1 after being sworn and empannelled for their ver- dict return a verdict of guilty Fo assult with deadly weapon as chagged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the court that judgment be suspended for a term of two years. TRANSPORT AND POSSKSS LIQUOR, The Defendant couies into open Court and pkeads guilty of the unlawfull possession of intoxicating liquors, 1 fendant be for aterm of Lonel LAEC#NY. OF AUTOMOBLIE,. No] Prosed “ith Leave as to Fred Plyler. The defendant Chal Plyéer comes into opeh Court and plead guilty to larceny of an Automoblie as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendarn Chal Plyler be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of KIGHT“EN MONTHS, and assigned to work on publie roads of said County for said period. Not to wear strives. TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR™ The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel Lewis *% Lewis pleads guilty to possessing tiquarx and transporting liquor. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the de- fendant be imprisoned in the common iail of Iredell County for a term of *7¥@ MONTHS, and assigned to work on public roads of said County for said period. Not to wear stripes. TRESPASS AND INJURY TO PERSONAL PROPERTY. Nol Prosed With Leave as to Carl Eller, Hugene Eewis and Everett Lewis. Remamded to Juvenile Bourt as to Joe Brooks. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning February 1, 1927 at 9:30 O'clock A. M. nenoncepesensinan scariest i ec ee A LT ne a ASTD nan <criteria ” IN THE SUPERIOR COURTS ’ JANUARY TERM? 2927., TURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 1927, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, Tuedday morning, February 1, 1927., at 8:50 A, M. for the @ispatch of business, No. 228 State vs. Marshal Lynch ~~ No. 229 State V8, Marshal Lynch No. 225 State vs. Herbert “Willians Raymond Cockerel ~— No. 230 State vs. John Linney No. 231 State vs. Bill Grant: LARCENY AND RECEIVING The defendant comes into épen Court and pleadsguilty to Receiving Stolen Goods, knowing same to be stolen.’ which plea is acceptedby the Solicitor for the State. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common {fail of Iredel} County for a term of TWELVE MONTHS and assigned to work on the public roa@s of said County for said period, To weer strbpes, PEDDLING WITHOUT LECENSE, The defendant comes into open Court and pleads gublty to Peddling without License as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and addudged by the Court that Judgment be suspended for a term of TO VARS, LARCKNY The defendants come into open Court and plead guilty to Larceny of property under the value of $20.00, ei 2 misdemeanor, which pleasthe Solicitor for the State accepts. _ By and with t»e consent of the County Attorney of Iredell County, judgment of the Court is that the de- fendants be imprisoned for a term of TKN MONTHS to be worked at the County Home, there are acceptable. In the event that their services fail to be acceptable, the County Commissioners are authorized to work them on the Chain Garg of Iredell County for said term. LARCKNY AND RECEIVING, The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty to a and Receiving as charged in the bill of indict- ment, FORCIBLE TRESSPASS, Bill changed to forcible trespass, and the defendant enters a plea of guilty which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. After consultation with the Bar and agreement with the Bar, the cases left open in Calendar on W respectively, are Calendared and stand for trial on Monday : ’ ednesday and Thursday, February 2 and 3 February 7, and cases left open and calendared for February 4 are ordered calendared for trial on Pabesday, February 8, This Honorable at 10:00 o'clock, A, M, Sakes a recess i curt/unttl Mondey morning, February 7, 1927) ag udge Pres an a ourts for the 15th Judicial District. In the event that thetr services IN THE SUPERIOR COURT? SECOND WEK WANUARYY TERM 1927, Feb 7 1927 In the Superior Court Second Week January Term 1927 NORTH CAROLINA: IREDKLL COUNTY: Tis Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment at 10:00 O'clock A M Mondary Morning, February 7th, 1927 when and whereHis Honor Michael Schenck Judge Presiding and Holcing Courts of the 15th Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and presiding, at this the second week for Civil Cases, at Januarv Term 1927, M P Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, returnee into open Court the names of the following good and lawf1] men to serve as Jurors of this Court for the secondweek for civil Cases. to-wit: J H Hildebran, J Calvin Shinn, J A Alexander, J P Barnard, S Henderson, Rov ARuftv, J “~ Orren, G A Drumm, JE Hoover, WL Keller, H B Collins, Wiley Johnson, L A Dagenhardt, I A bicLean, J # Deitz, CH Kinder, R F Goodin, H D Howard, J G Freeze and B A Turner. The following were excused for lawful causes: W A Fulp, C W Conner and S R “orrison, J L McKoy returned, "Not to be found in Ire- dell County". ARCENCY na defendant being tried Feb 1 1927 and judgment continued until today, it ak is ordered anc adjudged bv the Court that the defendant be impriekoned ir the County Jail for a a of EVG@HTE MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said veriod, Not to wear stripes. No 2 O State S hy Linney iS TING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR State ae {fndgment continued until next eee Vs of the Superior Court of Iredell County ee naka June McLean dant&sgiving bonds in the sim of FIVE HUNDRED ia ee to make his personal appearence at that term of : : — and not to depart the Court without leave, and abide judgmant of the Court. No 224 In the Superior Court Second Week Civil Court Term January Term 1927 NORTH GAROLINA: IRED“LL COUNTY: Alma Curria Clark ) Alnws Curr ) Charles C Clark ) lst Dad the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint: Answer, Yes. end. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes 3rd. Has the plaintiff been & bonsfide resident of the Stat o8 North Caroline for two years next preceeding the commencement of this action Answer, Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND WHK MONDAY FEBRUARY 7, 1927 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1927, Mary Alley Plaintiff vs. ISSUES Garfield Alley Defendant Ist. Were the plaintiff and defendant married and intermarrted one with the other as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, end. Did the defendant wrongfully abandon the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 5rd, Have the defendant and plaintiff lived separate and apert from esch other for more than five successive vears next prior to the com- mencement of this action, and was ssid separation without fault on the part of the pleintiff as alleged in the wmplaint? Answer: Yes 4th. Has the plairtiff been a bona fide resident of the state of North Carolina for more than five vears next preceeding the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell Connty. January Term, 1927. Alfred S. Troutman versus ~_ ek Pe I ee ee ee ee Isidore Wallace, J, H. Troutman, Mrs Tla Cloer and husband, G, C, Cloer : Robert L,. Troutman and wife, Lucy : Troutman, Nannie Scott, Angie Wilkin- son, Alma Troutman, Nealie Troutman and husband, Jas, F, Trbutman, Lee Troutman, Clara Troutman, Joyce Troutm Joy “man and § - ling Troutman, shai question: Was it the intention of Alfred S, a. My Troutman and his Mother, Mrs. z t routman in the purchase of the lot described in the complaint, to have the s : © Same conveyed be deed to Mrs. S. M, Troutman for life with remainder for life to Alfred 8, Troutman as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, question: Did the draftsman of ssid Deed by mistake ’ ® fail tn writing of the same, ommission and oversight — to convey to the said grantees therein their in terest in ssid tract of land as agreed upon by the parties in the complaint? as alleged Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND WEEK, JANUARY TERM, 1927, FEB. 7, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Merchants and Farmers Bank and A. W. Colson Plaintiffs vs. JUDGMENT D. A. Beam and wife, L. A. Beam, and L, A. Beam, Admini- stratrix of D. A. Beam Defendants o--Oocca 3 aa This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and being heard upon the recard, and it appearing to the Court that since the institution of this action and the report of the Referee therein the defendant D. A. Beam dies and that Mrs. L. A. Beam dulv qualified as administratrix of the estate of D, A. Beam and as such administratrix has come in and made herself party to this action; and it further appearing that the parties have compromised all matters in- volved in this action upon the following terms: A, W. Colson is to take fudgment against the defendants in the sum of $600.00 and the cost of this action, and the mortgage mentioned in the complaint is to be foreclosed by commissioners appointed by the Court; that at said sale Mrs. L, A. Beam is to he allowed to become a bidder and that out of the moneys received from the sale of said land this judgment and cost shall first be paid off and the remainder, if any, of the funds shall be paid over to Mrs. L. A. Beam as her individual property; It is therefore considered, adjudgéddand Gdeereed by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of Sig Hundred ($600.00) Dollars, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court; It is further considered and adjudged that the lands described in the complaint, being the lands described in the mortgage made by the de- fendants, D. A. Beam and wife, L. A. Beam, to Frank Linney on March 24th, 1909, and duly registered in Mortgage Book 27, page 514, in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County, be sold for cash at public outcry at the courthouse door of Iredell County, North Carolina, by Dent Turner and Z, V. Turlington, who are hereby appointed commissioners by the Court for that purpose, on the 5th day of March, 1927, and that the vroceeds of said sale shall be applied as follows: First, to the payment of the princi- pal and cost of this judgement, including cost of advertising and sale and the fees of the commissioners; Second, that the remainder be paid over to Mrs, L, A, Beam as her individual property, free and discharge from the claim of all otherpersons whatever; It 4s further considered and adjudged that A. W, Colson and Mrs said sale by the commissioners and become purchasera; f the time and pls L. A, Beam may bid at commissioners before making said sale shall give notice o : ng once a week for four weeks immediat ae and terma of sale by advertist ee ne Bernat Ree ee eer en See ape oe oe ene ee eRe eee i agen | i ] / / i eseshecs-copesiacneecameemee rae nga tte a en ee Nae es nee Sana deem nag ceca ees sl eesti aoe 196 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND EEK, JANUARY TERM, 1927. Feb. 7. 1927, ceding saidsale in the Mooresviile Interprice, a newspaper published in the- City of Mooresville, N. C. and by posing copies of such advertisement for thirty days at the courthduse door of Iredell Countyand three other public places in said county. Said commissioners shall file a report of their pro. ceedings in the 6ffice of the Clerk of the Superfor Court within ten days after the sale, This cause is referred to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel} County for the purptese of receiving the commissioners report, and in case an advanced bid shall be placed upon said land of ordering a resale thereof, and upon final sale of said land to enter an order of judgment confirming said sale to the purchaser, Michael Schenck By Consents Tet ae 3. V. Turlington & Grier & Grier Attornevs for Plaintiffs By Consent: Turner & Turner Attorneys for Defendants This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday morning, February 8, 1927, at 9:50 o'clock A. M udge presidind and Holding Courts,. for the 15th Judicial District, & North Carolina, ~ IN THE SUP¥REOR COURT, SECOND WERK, Tuesday, February 8, 1927. “- This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment, Tuesday aO© morning, February 8, 1927, at 9:30 o'clock A. M., for the dispatth of business. North Carolina, In the Superior Cort, Iredell County. Before theClerk,. Pp, P. Dulin and Rachel King, Administrators of R. T,. Weatherman vs. JUDGMENT J. J. Gainer, D. E. Smock et al This cause coming on tobe heard in the Superior Court of Iredélj} County before His honor, Jydge Michael Schenck, at Feb. Term, 1927, desire to compromise thektf differences with the agreement that the plaintiffs pay the costs; It is therefore ordered and adiwiged that the vlaitiffs take a non-suft and the costs be taxed against the rlaintiffs. Michael Schenck a Tdee Presiding By Cons ent: J, A, Roussseau ttv. for befts. a — This February Ferm 8th, 1927. . e North Carolina, In the Ourye rior Court, Iredell County. Fehruarv Term, 1927. W. By OPP v8. SUDOGOM RRS T. D, Miller and Martha W, Miller, Administratrix of the Estate of TY. D. Milier This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, Michael Schenck, Jdd@ge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that all matters in controversy between the plaintiff;, the late T. D. Miller and between the plaintiff and Martha W. Miller, Administratrix of T. Dp Miller, have been compromised and adjusted by agreement that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of FIFTKEN HUNDR&D DOLLARS in full settle- ment of all actions, rights of actions, claims and demands of the plaintiff against the late T, D. Miller of his Administratrix the present defendant. It is, therefore, by consent, ordered and adjudged that the plain@ tiff recover of the defendant, Martha W. Miller, Administratrix, C, T. A, of T, D, Miller, deceased, the sum of $1500.00 and the court costs in this action to be taxed by the Clerk, except the witness fees of the plaintiff's witnesses, which are to be paid by hin. cerhdteremenenesme re ee 4 198 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND WEEK, Tuesday, February 8, 1927, It is further ordered, by corsent, that execution of this Judgment shall be withheld for ninety days, and that no execution shall issue unt‘1 the axpiration of ninety days to be computed from thidéddate, This February 8th, 1927. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding at the Feb. Term Iredell Superior Court By Consents John A. Scott Turner & Turner, Lewis &« Lewis Attornevs for plaintiff Long & Glover B&B. M, Land Attornevs for Deferncant North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, January Term, 1927, Alfred 8 : Trontman ~~ a? ee St ne vs. Isidore Wallace, J, H, Troutman, Mrs. Ila Cloer and husband, G. C, Cloer, Robert L, Troutman and wife, Lucv Troutman, Nannie Scott, Angie Vilkinson and husband, Leon W. Wilkine son, Alma Troutman, Nealie Troutman, and husband, Jas. F, Trotman, Lee Troutman, Clara Troutman, Joyce Troutman and Sterling Troutman JUDGMENT — THIS CAUSK coming on to be heard before HIS HONOR, Michael Schenck, , na . " , Judge Presiding and the Jury, at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the Jury having answered the issued submitted to them, as set out in the record, in favor of the plaintiff: IT IS THARKFOKK, considered, ordered and adjudged, thatthe deed executed by Isidore Wallace to the crantors therein, on the 29th day of Wuly, 9 ~ 1922, and registered in Book 71 at page 123 in the Register of Deeds Office f Ir or ‘redell County, N. C., be and the same is hereby declared naull and void and ordered cancelled on the record, by the Clerk of thts Court, AND it ap- earir t ; . p ne that Mrs, S, M, Troutman djiad intestate since the execution of said deed, \ » who was entitled to a life interest to the lot of land conveyed in said deed accordin ; . ng to the intent of the parties, as found by the jury in this casé@s x i4 s therefore ordered, that Alfred S. Troutman is entitled to a fee simple deed to said land, Alfred S. Troutman, Michael Schenck Judge Presid ing IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECON WEEK, Tuesday, February 8, 1927. North Carolina, In the Sur rior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1927. General Motors Acceptance Corporation and Home Light and Power Company, and Utility Products Company. v8. JUD Gu BUT C. M. Miller THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before HIS HONOR, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and it appearing that summons was duly served on the defendant according to law, and that as ancillary to this proceeding the plaintiffs instituted Claim and Delivery proceedén ings, and that the vroperty in question is now in the hands of the plain- tiff, and that the varties hereto have effected and reached an agreement that the plaimtiff is entitled to the possession of said property. If IS THEREFOR, corsitdered, ordered, and adjudged that the plaintiff Home Light andPower Company is the owner of and is entitled to the possession of one Frigidaire Ice Box cooler, being composed of one "N" compressor, Serial number 162966, and two type 88-F coils. Let the cost be taxed against the plaintiff. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding BY SON SENT Turner & Turner ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS Lewis & Lewis ATTORNEYS FOR D&FENDANT North Carolina, Superior Court, Iredell County. Jan Term, 1927. T. N. Brown and David Brown, trading as T. N. Brown & Son. Plaintiffs vs. ISSUE R, L. Church Defendant 1. What amount, if anv, is the defendant indebted to the Pla‘ntiffs? Answer: $32.00 N 4 orth Carodina, In the Superior Court / Iredell County. T. N. Brown and David Brown trading and Going business under the firm name of T. N. Brown & Son. wns JUDGMENT R. L. Church 200 IN THE SUPERIOR COUR®, SECOND WEEK, February 8, 1927. This cause coming on to be heard at this the February Term of Iredell Superior Court, 1927 before His Honor Honorable Michael Schenck, Judge presiding and a Jury and the Jury having answered the issues sub- mitted tothem for determination in favor of the Plaintiff in this cause; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of THIRTY-T¥O DOLLARS ($32.00), togetherrwith the interest on $352.00 at the legal rate of six per cent from June 1, 1924 until paid. It is:further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover the cost of this actbon, Michael Schenck Judge Presiding, North Carolina, January Term, 1927, Iredell Countv. Suverior Court. Lacy Craig vs. JUDGMENT C. Clvde Craig This cause coming on te be hear and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has asked permission to take a non-suit ™ s It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and is hereby non-snited, Michael Schenck Judge Presiding North Carolina, Superior Court, Tredell County. Vv January Term, 1927. Stearns Bros., ( Inc.) Plaintiff vs ISSUES R. R. Madron and John F, Warren Music Co, Defendants 1. What amomt, if any, is the Dlaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant, R. R, Madron? Answer: $120.00 2. 28 th e intervenor, John F, Warren, the owner and entitled to the possession of the paino in controversy? Answer: No, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SKCOND ‘ERK, Tuesday, February 8, 1927. North Carolina, In the Snverior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1927. H, F. Deese, Individually, H. F. Deese, Next Friend of H. F. Deese, Jr. vs. JUDGMENT W. B. Blackwetl, Individually, and Rebecca Blackwell, aprearing herein by her guardian ad Litem, W. B, Blackwell. This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Presiding Judge at the January Term, 1927 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it apvearing to the Court that this action was instituted by the plaintiff, H. F. Deese, individually and as Next Friend of his son, H. F. Deese, Jr. for loss of services to the plaintiff, H. F. Deese, and for hospital bills and other expenses and for the damages to the said H. F. Deese, Jr. for nersonal injuries, all of which are alleged as a result of the said H. F. Deese, Jr. being struck by an automobile on Mulberry Street in the City of Statesville, North Carolina, on August 14th, 1926, said automobile being owned by the defendant, V. BH. Blackweal and being driven at the time by the defendant, Rebecca Blackwell, representeé herein by her duly apvointed Guardian ad Liten, W. B. Blackwell; And it further aprearing to the Conrt that the defendants have denied the allegations of negligence set out in the complaint but have offered to compromise all matters and things at issue and in controversy by the payment of the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars for the hospi- tal bills and other expenses in connection with said injuries; and it further appearing that the plaintiff, H. F. Deese, Jr. was not seriously injured; ‘And 4t further appearing that the vlaintiffs have agreed to accept said compromise and settlement subtect to the sanction and avrroval of the Court after investigation; And the Court, after an investigation of the facts in reference to the nature, character andextent of the injuries, and also in reference to the manner in which the said injuries were sustained, finds as a fact that the settlement above referred to is for the best interest of the minor H. F. Deese, Jr. and hereby approves the said settlement; And it further appearing to the Court that the defendants, cotem- poraneous with the signing of the judgment, have paid over to the paaintiffs the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars in full for denagen Sune Nenoae H, F, Deese, Jr, and the hospital bills and other expenses in connection with said injuries; And it further appearing to the Court that the vartiss hereto nd settle all matters at issue between have mutually agreed to compromise @& them growing out of theaforesaid injury to H. ¥. Degee, dr, ant Wnts 22 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND "ERK, o Tuesdav, February 8, 1927. of H. F. Deese, Sr. for hospital bills and other expenses, #11 as alleged in the complaint, upon the defendants paying to the paaintiffs the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty ($250.00) Dollars, and that the parties desire the sanction and approval of the Court in order to make said mntract binding, effective and valid by reason df the fact that the plaintiff, H. F. Deese, Jr’. is a minor, being represented in this action by his father, who is the next frieng Auly appointed by the Court to bring said action for and on behalf of said H, F, Deese, Jr.3; anc the Court having investigated the facts involved in said personal injury to the said H, F. Deese, Jr. for the vurpose of ascere taining whether or not there was actionable negligence on the part of the defendants and also to learn the extent of the injury to the plaintiff, H, PF, Deese, Jr. and having fully investigated the facts in relation to ssid inifury as well as to the extent of the injurv sustained by the said H. F, Deese, Jr, all for the purnose of enabling the Court to determinewhether or not it is for the best interest of the said minor H,. F, Deese, Jr, that said compromise and settlement of 411 claims, actions and causes of action, which said H, FP, Deese, Jr, minor as aforesaid, now has or might hereafter have against the deferdants or either of them by reason of said versonal injury, for the sum of $250.00; and the Gourt being of the ovinion, sfter having made such in- vestigation that it is for the best interest of the said H. F, Deese, Jr. that the matters at issue in this action be compromised and settled, and that the vlaintiff, H. F, Deese, Sr. Next Friend of the said minor H,. F. Deese, Jr. sccept and receive from the deferdants the sum of $250.00 as a full and final settlement fer all damages whatsoever, which have heretofore, or which might hereafter arise by reason of the injury received by the said H. F, Deese, Jr, growing out of the matters and things alleged in the complaint, as well as all sums, claims and demands @ue the paaintiff, H. F, Deese, Sr. for loss of services, hospital bills and other exnense 8s incurred by him growing outof the injurv aforesaid of Hy Py Deaee: gn > ° TT IS, THEKEFORK, considered, ordered, adjudzed and decreed that it 1s 2 s : or the best interest of H, F. Deese, Jr, that the matters at issue in the ’ above entitled action be compromised and settled for the sum of $250.00, a : Lor and that the phaintiffy Hy F, Deese, Srivas next friend of the said H. F Decse, Jr. and H . an - F. Deese, Sr, in@ividually, receive and be paid by the d6n fendants the sum of $2 we, 50.0 0.00 as settlement in full for al} damages whatsoever dv reason as of the nersonal injury the said H. F. Deese. Jr received, and of . - 7S 9 e > ve 9 1 . . , D dad al expenses, lost time and costs incurred by the sai a H F Deege sr an 3 A . * - : @ that all matter ers and things growing out of said injury, all as alleged in the complaint; It is furt n . irther ordered, adjudged and decreed that the agreement of compromise and settlement entered into by and betwe ; . en same is parties hereto be and the hereby in all respects Sanctioned and a pr : % therefore ordered, pproved and confirmed, and it $8 ad fudged Red and decreed that thepplaintiff recover of the de-— oy IN TRE SUPFRIOR COURT, SECOND WRK, 203 Tuesday, Februafgy, 8, 1927. fendants the sum of $250.00 as settlement in ful) of all damages whatsoever by reason of the injury received by said H. F. Deese, Jr. at the time and on the occasion mentioned in the conplaint, and of all expenses, hospital bills, losss of time and other costs said H, F, Deese, Sr, has suffered and sustained by reason of the matters and things alleged in the complaint; and the defendants upon the payment of this judgment shall be forever discharged from any and all further liability to the said H, F., Dees*, Jr. and the said H. F. Deese, Sr. as Next Friend of the said H, F. Deese, Jr., and in- dividually, by reason of the matters and things alleged in the complaint; It is further ordered that the plaintiff recover of the defend- ants the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Januarv Term, 1927. H, FS Deese, individually, H. F. Deese, Next Friend of H. F. Deese, Jr. X 1 I vs. 6 ORDER 4 4 4 4 W. B, Blackwe@l, individually, and Rebecca Blackwell, apvearing herein bv her Guardian ad Litem, W. B. Blackwell This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars paid by the defendants to the plaintiffs is not more than is sufficient to vay and @ischarge the hospital bill and other expenses incurred by H. F. Deese inconnection tith the accident, it is therefore, ordered and adjudged that theaforesaid sum of Two Hundred end Fifty Dollars paid in this action be turned over to H. F, Deese and used by him in defraving the hospital bill and other expenses in- curred by him, Michael Schenck Judge Presiding North Carolina , In Suverior Court. Iredell County. H. F. Deese 3 ese, Jr. (a minor) eee et eee ( APPLICATION FOR APPOINT# vs MENT OF GUARDIAN AD 7 LITEM W. B. Blackwell and Rebecca Blackwell (a Minor) To the Clerk of the Superior Court: E. M. Land, respectively showeth to the Court: 1. That Rebecca Blackwell, is a minor about eighteen vears of age and is without testamentary or general guardian. 2. That theaabove action is instituted by H. F. Deese and H, F. Deese, Jr. against the defendants for the recovery of the damages against the defendants growing out of the injuries sustained by H, F. Deese, Jr. in being 204 IN THE SUPERIOR OOURT, SECOND WEEK, Tuesday, February 8, 1927, stuck by an automobile operated by Rebecca Blackwell with the consent of hep father, W. B. Blackwell, the owner of the seid car, and that it if further , ° . necessary that some capable, discreet and-competent person be appointed as Guardian Ad Litem to represent the said minor in said action. Wherefore the undersigned prays that some capable, discreet and competent person be appointed Guardian Ad Litem to represent the said Rebecca Blackwell in said action. Tis 10th dav of Janusry, 1927. BE. M. Land North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. H, F, Deese and H, F, Deese, Jr. (a minor) 0 APPOINTMENT OF { ‘a. GUARDIAN AD LI THA Y., B, Blackwe2l and Rebecca Blackwell, (a minor) This cause comhng on to be heard upon the application of E. M, Land for the appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem of Rebecca Blackwell, a minor about eightesn vears of age and appearing to the Court that the action is instituted against the defendants for the recovery of the damage for injuries sustained bv H, F, Deese, Jr, from being struck bv an automobile operated by the defendant Rebecca Blackwell, with theconsent of herrfather, W. B. Blackwell, the defendant, owner of the said automobile, and it further appearing that “, B, Blackwell is a capable, discreet and camvetent person to represent said minor in this action; It is now ordered and adjudged thet W. B. Blackwell be and is hereby apvointed Guardian Ad Litem of said minor to represent her in this action. This lOth day of Janusry, 1927, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior court North C 1 arolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF NEXT FRIEND H, F, Deese and H, F, Deese ( minor.) i ) ( vs. W ’. B. Blackwell and Rebecca Blackwell, ) $ ' ( a minor) To the Clerk of the Sur rior Court: E. M, Land, respectively showeth to the Court: ce Se F. Deese, Jr, is a minor about six years of age and is without testamentary or general guardian 2. That t at the above action is instituted by H. F, Deese and H. F.. Deese, Jr. against ’ gainst the defendarts for the recovery of the damages against the IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND RFK, 205 Tuesday, February 8, 1927. defendants growing out of the injuries sustained bv H. F. Deese, Jr. in being struck by an automobile operated by Rebecca Blackwell with the consent of her father, W. B. Blackwell, the owner of the said car, and that it is further necessary that some capable, discreet and competent person be appointed as Next Friend to represent said minor in said action. Wherefore the undersignedcprays that some capable, discreet and competent person be appointed as Next Friend to the said H. F. Deese, Jr. in said action. This 10th day of Januwrry, 1927, E. M. Land North Carolina, In Sur rior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. H. F. Deese and H. F. Deese, Jr. $a minor) 6 t APPOINTMENT OF vs. 6 ( NEXT FRIEND Ww. B, Blackwell and Rebecca Blackwetl ( a minor) § This cause coming on to be heard upon the application of E, M. Lana for the avvointment of the Next Friend of H, F, Deese, Jr., a minor about six vears of age and appearing to the Court thatthe action is instituted baainst the defendants for the recovery of the damages for injuries sustained by H. F. Deese, Jr. from being struck by an automobile operated by the defendant, Rebecca Blackwell, with the consent of her father, W. B, Blackwell the defendant, owner of the said automobile and that the said H, F. Deese, Jr. is 2 necessary party to this action; and tt is further appearing thet Kh. F. Deese is 4 capable, discreet and com- petent person to represent said minor in this action; It is now ordered and adjudged that H. F, Deese be and he is hereby a pnointed as next friend of said minor to represent him in this action, and that he be and is hereby empowered to join in this action as Next Friend of said minor. This 10th day of January, 1927. J. A. Hartness Glierk of Superior Court. I hereby accept the appointment of Next Friend of H, F. Deese, Jr. and promise to faithfully represent and protect his interest in this action. This 10th day of January, 1927. H. F. Deese, Sr. ae, IN THE SUPRRIOR COURT SECOND WEEK, 206 Tuesday, February, 8, 1927, Dent Turner Jury withdrawn and mistrial ordered, vs. Hose Huffman, trading as Huffman Motor Company, and Lyles Austin. North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1927, Dent Turner Vs. J UPGe a 32 Hose Huffman, trading as Huffman Motor Company and Lyles Austin. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor ’ Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding at the January Term, 1927 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N. C. and it avvearing to the Court that all matters and things in controversy between the plaintiff and the defendants to this action, have been adjudted and settled, IT IS THEREFORE considered, ordered and adjudged and derreed that the note given by the plaintiff Dent Turner to Hose Huffman, bits pavable to the Huffman Motor Company, dated the 13th day of July, 1926 in the sum of Three Hundred Dollars, and payable three months after date, be cancelled and delivered up to the plaintiff Dent Turner, marked "Satisfied in Full®; It is further order d that the cost of this action be taxed against the de- fendants by the Clerk, Michael Schenck Lewis & Lewis Judge Presiding Attornevs for Plaintiff John D. Slawter Attornevs for Defendants North Carolina * In the Suverior Court, Tredell County, : January Term, 1927. Hon. Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, ts We the G ‘ e Grand Jury for the January Term of Iredell County Superior Court 1927, keg leave to submit the following report: We hav : ® acted upon all bills sent before us by the Solicitor and have made due returns of same to the Court The Count unty Jail was visited and there was found to be one colored colored three male colored and e ef 8s repobt ’ n thi rte n whit males, These pri soner th vy ar ll fed and car a | e sani tar y ev 6 we e8 for We found the . jai i an We visited t he County Chain Gang in a committee of three and found IN THE SUP*RIOR COURT, SECOND WRK, 207 Tuesday, February 8, 1927, five white prisoners, and thffteen colored. There are eighteen mules, nine wagons, two day guarda, and one night guard, Also one guard used as service man. We found one white convict crippled but in good health. We recommend this wvenyvict be returned to fail to finish term. Also one colored convict ims sick but not serious, The campwe found in good sanitary condition. Prisoners revort they were well cared for. We also fourid the equipment in fair dondition. We visited the County Home for aged and infirm and found eighteen white women, six colored women, ten white men, nine colored men; a total of fortyethree. We found six white women in the infirmarv, two white men sigk and two colored women sick. “We found the farm in excellent condition, and all the pabients well cared for. We inspected the Court House and its several offices and find records neatly kept by the latest methods in hookkeeping. We recommend the following; That all the interior both. up and down stairs in the court house be renovated by painting. We find the vaults in the Régister of Deeds and Clerk's office unsafe against fire and recommend that fire pr@Of vaults be built as soon as poasible. We apnrove the stand that the County Commissioners have taken in regard to enlarging the Court house offices as we find them hamvered for room, Respectfully submitted, CC, H, Knox Foreman of Grand Jury NortheCarolina, In the Suverior Cort, Iredell County. Jan. Term, L927. J, H,. Smith and The Employers! Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, of London, England, Plaintiffs. oo. JUDGHERT ' j 0 + 4 t Mrs. O. L. Turner, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Superior Court and being hears, and it appearing to the Court from the admissions of the parties, that this is an acticn brought by the plaintiff to ree cover from the defendant damages caused by a collision between the autoe mobile of the plaintiff, J. H. Smith, and a delivery truck owned by the defendant, Mrs. 0, L,. Turner, which seid collision occurred on the 24th day of November, 1925, at the interesection of Tradd Street and Devie Avenue, in the City of Statesville, N. C., and that all matters and things in controversy between the plaintiffs ané defendant in this action have been compromised and settled in full, and that the defendant has paid to the plaintiffs the amount agreed upon as compromise and is not incunerr to the palintff s in any further amount on account of the matters and things set forth in the plaintiffs' complaint. 208 IN THE SUPERTOR COURT, SECOND WERK, Tuesday, February 8, 1927, It is, therefore, by consent of the parties, ordered and ad Judged that the plaintiffs recover nothing more of the defendant in this action, and that one-half of the costs of this action be taxed against the Plaintiffs, ang one-half against the defendant. This the Slst day of January, 1297. Michael Schenck Jyndge Presiding By consent of Grier & Grier Attornevs for plaintiffs OE A Attorney for Defendant North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, January Term, 1927. Alma Curris Clark Plaintiff VS Charles C, Clark Defendant 5 ist. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, end. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff as alleged in the gsomplaint? Answer: Yes, Srd. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Caroli ¢ two v7 n lina for two vears next preceeding the commencement of this action, Answer: Yes, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell Connty ‘ Thos. A, Moore by Amos Moore, his Guardian vs. Mooresville Cotton Millis { 4 ae ' t lst. Was t as the plaintiff Phos, A. Moore injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, ena. Did the he plaintiff Thos. A. Moore contribute to his own injury as alleged in the answer? Answer: No, Srd. What amount, f any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: $2,000.00 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND ERK, Tuesday, February 8, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Thomas A. Moore, minor, by his Guardian, Amos Moore. VSe Mooresville Cotton Mills This cause coming on to be heard at this the January Term of the Superior Court for Iredell County, before His Honor, Judge Schenck, presiding, and a jury. And the jury having returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $2000.00 and costs. Now, therefore, it is considered and adtudged that the plaintiff recover of the deferidant the sum of $2000.00 and the costs of this action. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding State of N. CC. Ex Rel Mittie Dison The plaintiff takes a voluntary non-suit, and VS. the costs of this action to be taxed against the j 0 ) : { ) Kspy Lambert plaintiff. Stearns Bros., Inc., V8. R. R. Madron, et al. Upon the coming in of the verdict the intervenor, John F, Warren, moved to set aside the verdict, Motion overruled, The Intervenor ob jects and excepts. Intervenor moves for a new trial. Motion overruled, Inter- venor excepts. Judgment. To the signtng of the iudgment the Intervenor ob- jects and excepts and anpeals to the Supreme Court for errors assigned and to be assigned, including the refusal to submit the issue tendered by the Intervenor and to the submission of the issues actually submitted, and apveats to the Supreme Court. Appeal bond in the sum of $100 adjudged suf- ficient. Suvercedeas bond in the sum of $200 adjudged sufficient. By agreement, Intervenor allowed 30 days in which to make up and serve case on anpeal to the Sunremer Court, appellee allowed 50 days after such service to make up and serve countercase or file exceptions. 210 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND WERK, Tuesday, February 8, 1927, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1927, Bssie Dalfon, veser v8. TSsuvuazZs John Henry Dalton Deferdant lst. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint. Answer: Yes, 2nd, Did thenlaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, rd, Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five years prior to the conmencement of this actionas alleged in the complaint? Answer; Yes, 4th. Was said separation without fault of the vlaintiff? Answer: Yes, North Caroli: 5 arolina, In the Superior Court, [redell County edell County. January Term, 1927. Essie Dalton vs. IJUDGH EXT John Henry Dalton This cause coning on to be heard at this term of the Suverior Court and being heard before His Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jurv having answered the issued submitted to them as follows: " lst. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of N + A " orth Carolina for more than five years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yas, 2nd. Did t id the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, ord, Hav a ) @ the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five ve years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in thé complaint? Answer: Yes, 4th: W a8 separation without fault of the plaintirr ? Answer; Yes, | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, SECOND WERK 211 Tuesday, February 8, 1927. : It is, therefore, adjudged, ordered and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff,eud Essie Dalton, and the defsandant, John Henry Dalton, be, and the same are hereby dissolved and an absolute divorce granted. It is further ordered by the Court that the plaintiff be taxed with the cost of this action by the Clerk of the Court. Michael Sch@fick ——Sidge Presiding lsthJudicial District ~~ Lottie B, Alley vs. Robt. B. Alley, Continued. Joe Byers vs. Sarah Byers, Continued. J. O. Gaither, vs, Statesville Lumber Co., Continued. Clyde Sharpe vs. Etta Sharpe, Continued. Je Be Colt Co. vs. E. Pruitt Hager, Continued under former order. Ida Head vs. Paul Baker, Continued under former order. J. W. Redman, et al vs, Jane Sowers, Continued, W. D. Tumner, Admr. vs. Y. E. Selby, Continued. Dallas A, Shafer Co. vs. G. & M. Service Station, Continued. Link-Pickens Publishing Co. vs. C. L, Gilbert, Continued, Link-Pickens Publishirg Co. vs. C. J. Jones, Continued. Link-Pickens Publishing Co. vs. T. Ross Alexander, Continued, Link-Pickens Publishing Co. vs. C. B. Parker, Continued, Link-Pickens Publishing Co. vs. Ross V, Alley, Continued, Link»Pickens Publishing Co. vs. J. K, Morrison Gro.* Pl Co., Cont. Link-Pickens Publishing Co. vs. J. R. Alexander, Continued, Link-Pickers Publishing Co. vs. L. Gordon, Continued, Link-Pickens Publé#shing Co. vs. D. B. Stearns, Continued, E; V. Privette vs. R. H. Mason, Continued. Henkel-Craig Livestock Co. vs. E. P. Jennings, et al, Continued, F. J. Ostwalt vs. J. S, Stearns, Continued, J. L. Shimpock vs. J. P. Kennerly, Continued, Myps. A. P. Grace vs. Tryon Development Co., Continued. Sherrill Motor Co. vs. J. G. Clark and J, M. Ramsey, Continued. Atlantic Paint Co. vs. Mooresville Furniture Co., Continued, L. Alice Hayes, Admr. M. L. Campbell vs. Columbus Campbell, Cont. Mrs. Louise Hayes vs. Columbus Campbell, Continued, Beam, Continued. J. H. McElwee vs. Hutton and Burbonnéis Company, Continued. A. H. Keller and wife vs. Charlie Hicks and wife, Continued, Statesville Lumber Company vs. R. L. Church and G, S. Grant, Cont. Statesville Lumber Company vs Eops Hammie and Rd Micholson, Cont. James C, Davis, Director General of Railway vs. Cleveland Mfg. Co. . ’ Continued, Director General of Railway vs. Statesville Co., Cont Janes C. Davis, No. No. No, No. No. No. No. No, 285 286 287 520 524 527 331 536 NaxxSae 11, 1927, at 10:00 O%clock 4, L. B. Hollar vs. Jesse Miller, Continued, Statesville Lumber Co. vs. L. W. Westmoreland, Continued, Statesville Lumber Co. vs. N, G. Holmes, et al Continued, Statesville Lumber Co. vs. Dorsett Fraley, et al, Continued, Statesville Lumber Co. vs. N, G. Holmes, et al, Continued, Mrs, M. E. Westmoreland vs. J. A. Westmoreland, Continued, J. A, Westmoreland vs. Mrs. M. E. Westmoreland, Continued, Statesville Lumber Co. vs. N. G. Holmes, et al, Continued, Hillard Summers vs. Gertrude Sammers, Continued, Bank of Stonv Point vs. D. D, Littlejohn, et al, Continued, C. B. Freeze vs. Mrs. John L. Lowe, Continued, IcGowan, et al vs. Walter Beckham, et al, Continued, Shuford vs. “,. R. Hart, Summers and Summers, and McAuley and Stearns Bros., Inc, Continued, ur V, C. Moore vs. D. G. Wilson, Continued, Dalley Carter vs, James Carter, Continued, . Statesville Ludber Co. vs. J, T. Chappell and Alice Campbell, Cont, Tri-State Transportation Co, vs, Stearns Bros., Inec., and Glove Indemhtity Company, Continued, Carl Mathis vs, Cleo Mathis, Continued. A. “, Dula vs, North Carolina Optometric Society, et al, Cont. Jenkins Hdw. Co. vs. Stearns Bros., Inc., Foster and Cockie, and State Highway Commission, Continued. Shuford vs. Murdock Chair Co., Continued, Mills vs. Mooresville Cotton Mills, Inc., Continued. Brookshire vs, McQueen Foures and wife, Continued, Zeigler, vs. J, F. Combs, Lelia Combs, and W, P, Carpenter, Cont, P, Dulin, Receiver Carolina Stone Company vs, Stearns Bros., Inc, Cont, & M. Service Station vs. Fred Chambers, Continued. C. Atwell vs, Southern Rai lway Company, et al, Continued, Celeste Billingsley, et al, vs. City of Statesville, Continued. Mrs. Beda Ost vs. Ellen Nilseon, Continued, J. G,. Shelton vs. Hand Medicine Co., Continued, A. L. Watts vs. Hand Medicine Co., Continued, W. D. Turner vs. Hand Medicine Co., Continued, J. A, Davidson vs. C, Ww, Gilleland, Continued. C, H. Turner, et al vs. J. W. Grogg, Continued, J . ae. By Cloahinger vs, &, J. Collins, Aamr., Continued. P ope Tire and Battery Company vs. D, B, Stearns, Continued. R. L. Shuford vs, M. B, Travis, Continued, ThanxxaAxxhaarn This Honorable Court se IN THE SHPERIOR COURT Fricay JANUARY TERM, 1927 Friday February 11, 1927. This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournmant February 11, 1927 at 10:00 O'clock A. M. for the dispatch of business, Carolina North - In the Suverior Cort, Iredell County. Mary Alley, Plaintiff I i eae ' JUDGMENT § ) Garfield Alley, Defendant Tis cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and the Jury; and the Jury havings answered the following issues which were submitted to them bv the Court, as follows, to-wit: lst. Were the Plaintiff and defendant married and inter-married one with the other as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2nd. Did the defendant wrongfully abandon the plaintiff as al- leged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, rd. Have the defendant and the plaintiff lived separate and apart from each other for more than five successive years next prior to the commencenent of this action, and was said separation without fault on the part of the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 4th. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five vears next preceeding the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court lst. That thelbtnds of matrimony existing between the daid plaintiff and said defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved absolutely, and that said plain- tiff, Mary Alley, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with and from the daid defendant, Garfi eld Alley. 2nd. That the plaintiff, Mary Alley, be and she is hereby, releaved and re- leased from any liability whatsoever as 4 wife to the defendant, and it if fur- ther ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court, that said defendant, Garfield Alley, be and he is hereby denied all right of courtesy or any other interest whatsoever in and to the property, estate and belongins of the said prainert 4 Std, That the plaintiff, Mary Alley, be and she fs hereby, by the order, ad= 14 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT . — IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, ! JANUARY TERM, 1927. ) JANUARY TERM, 1927. Friday, February ll, 1927. Ag Priday, February 11, 1927. fudgment and decree of this court, granted ful and unrestricted custody North Carolina, In the Superior Court, e d care of all of the living children, issues of the gaid marriage control anc ca ' Iredell County. January Term, 1927. as above stated between the plaintiff, Mary Alley, and Garfield Alley, That the plaintiff pay all costs of this action to be taxed by the Statesville Cotton Mills vs. ORDER SETTING ASIDE JUDGMENTS 4th. Clerk of this Court. Michael Schenck H. G. Welborn Judge Presiding This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge, North Carolina, In the Superior Cowt, on motion of the defendant, to set aside all judgments heretofore entered Iredell County. January Term, 1927, in this cause and to vacate the warrant of attachment and being heard, and Mrs. Alma Currin Clark the Court being of the opinion that the motion of the defendant should be vs JUDGMENT allowed upon the following conditions, which conditions are accepted by the Charles C, Clark defendant, to-wit: That the defendant waive any and all rights and claims for dumages against the nlaintiff or any of its officers for alleged wrong- This cause coming on to be heard and béing heard before His H . e S a ful attachment or for any allegations in the complaint or other papers in Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding and a jur and the jury having answered | ie : - _— a . - this cause, alleging fraudulent conversion by the defendant, or any other ‘ssues submitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against : tort action arising out of this action; the defendant, as set out in the record: It is now ordered and adiudged that the warrant of attachment It is therefore ordered and adjudge t t tntiff be 8 . and eC iutges She mm plasnsisy be ont. ae and all judgments heretofore entered in this cause including, by consent of is hereby granted a divorce A Menca Et There from the bonds of matrimony with ( the parties, the judgment of default and inquiry entered by the Clark ‘of t 1S, p > pe. SOPennent, Ane Vhat her nase We ei Sn ee | the Superior Court of Iredell County, be and thev are hereby vacated and set ordered that plaintiff pav the costs of this action. aside, It is further ordered and adjudged that the defendant be and he answer to the vlaintiff or its m unsel and that the vlaintiff be allowed sixe North Carolina ’ In the Superior Court, ty days, after furntshing of such copy, to file reply. Iredell County, ounty January Term, 1927. Both plaintiff and defendant in open Court waive the find@tings of the fact by the Court to suprort this order. Stearns Bros., Inc Vs. JUDGMENT Michael Schenck R. R. Madron and John F Judge Presiding WYarren Music Company, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Mich ichael Schenck, and a jury, and the Yury having answered the issues submitted - to them by the Court as set out in the record: Q It is therefore ordered and ad judged that the plaintiff recover of, the defendant, R. R, Madron, of the le 0 vy, October 26th, 1926, and that the defendant, John F, Warren Mu this action, yOfpthe action to be taxed by the Clerk of Company, recover not ’ hing by and that said defendant pay the cos this Court, \ Michael Schenck Judge Presid ng IN THE SUPKRICR COURT, JANUARY TERM, 1927, 216 HON, MICHAKL SCHENCK, Judge Presiding. In the Sur rior Court, Free corghians Tannery Here, 1987, I, John Thomas Gillespie, do solemnly swear that I will support the constitution of the United States; so help me, God, Jnoyw T. Gillespie Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, this the 8th day of February, 1927. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding and Hod@ing Courts in 15th Judicial District. I, John Thomas Gillespie, do #¢lemnly and sincerely swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the constitutional powerssand authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; and that I wil] endeavor to supvort, maintain and defend the constitution of said State, not inconsistent with the constitution of the Uni ted States, to the best of mv knowledge and ability; so help me, God. Jno. T. Gillespie Sworn to and subscribed before me tn open Court, this the 8th day of February, 1927, Wichael Schenck Judge Presiding and Holding Courts in 15th Judicial District, I, John Thorias Gillespie, do swear that I will truly and honestly de- mean myself in the practice of an attorney, according to the best of my knowledge and ability,; so help me, God. Jno. T. Gillespie Sworn to and subscribed before me in oven Court, this the 8th day of February, 1927. Michael Schenck Jucge Presiding and Holding Courts in Fiftesanth Judicial District. North Carolina, In the Sunerior Court; Tredell County. January Term, 1927. Mr. John Thomas Gillespie having presented in open Court a license signed by the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, dated August 234, 1926 authorizing him to practice as an attorney and Counsellor of law in the Courts of this State, and he having taken and subscribed to the oaths required of Attornevs at law in this State, It is ordered and adjudged that the said John Thomas Gillespie be, and he is admitted to the practice of the profession of Attorney and Counsellor at Law in all Courts of this State, It is further ordered and adjudged by this Court that a record of thé proceedings taken herein be spread upon the Minutes of this Court of this State. This the 8th day of February, 1927, Michael Schemek Juige Presiding ' IN THE SUPERIOR COURT JANUARY TERM, 1927 Friday Pebruary 11, 1927. Na th Carobina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. H. H. Yount, trading and doing business as Yount Motor Company. vs. SUDGeM ERT J. M. Anthony and J. V. Anthony This cause coming on to be heard and being heard the 7th day of December, 1925, and it aprearing to the Court thet the simmons was issued in this action on the 28th day of Sevtember, 1925, and returnable on the 10th dav of October, 1925, and that ssid summons was served by versonal service on said defendants, being served on the defendant, J, M, Anthony, on September 2Z8th., 1925, and on the defendant, J. V. Anthony, September 29th, 1925, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in said action on’ the 7th day of October, 1925, and that said defendants are justly in@ebted to plaintiff on note in the sum of $310.00 together with interest on same from the 8th day of August, 1925, until paid, same being due by note, and being a certain stated amount, and that said defendants failed to file an answer or demur to said complaint within the time allowed by law: It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $310.00 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 8th day of August, 1925 until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against said defendants. This December 7th, 1925. J. A, Hartness @ierk Superior court, Iredell County. MOLOCEMEOE COCWOUEWOEE @QGEGORE “COECEZCEO( CHELLEE EL OROCOCE No. 231 LARCENY State vs. Bill Grant The evidence in this case having been heard on Feb. 1, ent braver fox judgment continued ante? today, it is therefore ovipened ¢ re pes by the Court that the defendant be im- bak ene he common jail of Iredell County for a term of S to be worked on roads of said county for said peftod. Misdemeanor not to wear stripes, Sbate.t daa ~ oo we. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. J2°O% Brookshire and The American Agricultural Chemical Company B Bradburn Plaintiff VS. JUDGMENT OF VOLUMBARY NON-SUIT VSe R. W. Wallace and Y, S, White and B, M. Wilhelm Iad Wallace OE pee A Oe ne Defendants This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the under- This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of signed clerk, it appearing to the court that the plaintiffs and the defend- the Sunerior Court of Iredell County, and being heard on this Monday, February ants in this action have compromised and adjusted their differences and the 7th, 1927; and it apnearing to the Court that on the Srd day of January, 1927 plaintiffs make .otion for voluntary non-suit. the plaintiff procured a summons in this action to be issued againgt the de- It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiffs fendants, retumable on the 17th dsv of January, 1927, and at the same time be, and they are hereby non-suited and take nothing by this action. It is filed with the Clerk a verified complaint; and it further appearing that the further ordered that the plaintiffs pay the cost to be taxed by the clerk of platntiff caused said dummons, together with a compy of the complaint, to be this court. served on each of the defendants and that service of said summons and copv This the 28th day of February, 1927. of the complaint was duly made on each of the defendants on the 12th dav of J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court 8 January, 1927; and it further annearing that this is an action against the CECEOEOOECEOEO CCCLOEE deferdants for breach of exnress contract to pay a sum certain, to-wit the @CECEHOCEOE COC GAQOH sum of $341.58, evidenced by the vromissory note of the deferdants in the above 317m t ring ante ¢ = 2 : oe : ‘ : im, bearing date of January 18th, 1926; and it further apvearing that the North Carolina, In the Superior,Court, defendants have failed to apnear and answer or demur to the verified complaint a ye ree 3 Iredell Cowmty. Before the Clerk. ALY * as atoresaid, and still fatl to anpear and answer or demur to said : : H. A. Smith complaint; and it further appearing that the tine for defendants to answer - ae U0 6M SAF demir or plead to said action has exnired; ve Té te. chavat a P, M. Ostwalt and wife, eer fore, considered anc adjudged by the Court that plaintiff Nancy Ostwalt and J. C, SAnAGAM AP th . Brookshire. ecover ¢ the defendants and each of themsthe sum of THR## HUNDRED AND FORTY- INE 58/100 (%: ae ‘ * 58/100 ($341.68) DOLLARS, with interest thereon at the rate of six ver This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on this Monday the S ran , +} ‘ wn Per annum for the 16th day of January, 1926, until vaid, together with the 28th day of February, 1927 before the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, Iredell County and it appéaring to the court that the summons in this action The Rensay,. Poleaaty Tth, 1927, was issued on the 20th day of June, 1927 and returnable to the court on the first day of February, 1927; J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County. And it appearing to the court that the summons in this action was properly served upon the defendants, P. M. Ostwalt and wife, Nancy Ostwalt “eaemeneeee midis WON Gay aE Zeimers, LORY, wr resting to She. ¢aie THERE Ws." 7: Ostwalt and wife, Nancy Ostwalt said summons and by leaving with each of said defendants a copy of said summons; and it further appearing that the defendant J. C, Brookshire, accepted service of seid summons and waived the service ther there of and waived the service of a copy of the complaint by the sheriff on the 20th day of January, 19273 And it further appearing to the court that 20 days have olLapeed one the return date of said summons and no answer or demurrer has been filed by * t the defendants; And it further appearing to the cov that on the 13th day of 1925, P. M. Ostwalt and wife, Nancy Ostwalt became indebted to J, C. Brookshing ’ in the sum of $875.40 and as evidence of such indebtedness executed and deliver ed to J. C. Brookshire their promissory note in said sum bearing interest from date at six per cent per annum and pavable annually; and it aprvearing to the court that for value received the said J. C. Brookshire some time Guring the month of June, 1925 sold said note with recourse on him to H. A, Smith; and it further appearing to the court that on Tuesday, the 18th day of May, 1926 the mortgape deed of trust securing skid note was foreclosed under the power contained in said deed of trust and at said foreclosure sele,. J8, Brookshire became the last and highest bidder at the price of $600.00; And it further appearing to the court that the cost of said foreclosure sale amounted to $69.00 leaving a balance due arising from the sale of said property as aforesaid of $531.00; and it further appearing to the court that the said J. C. Brookshire had not paid to the Trustee the said ovruchase price of the land at the foreclosue sale under the deed of trust and it further appearing to the court theat the amount due the said H, A. Smith by the said defendants is the sum of $873.40 with interest thereon from the 13th day of March, 1925 until paid or $969.79 with interest from the 28th day of February 1927; the sum of $69.00 being the cost cést arising under the foreclosure sale on the 18th day of May, 1926; «nd for the cost of this action. It is there. fore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the said sum of $969.79 with interest from the 28th day of Februery, 1927; second, the sum of $69.00 with interest thereon from the 18th dsy of May, 1926 and for the cost of this action, to-wit, the sum of $ Ml. 77 un 2% $2. $0.0 therseordered and adjudgea that when the said J, C. Brookshire shall pay to the Trustee the sum of $600.00 arising from the foreclosure sale of the deed of trust aforesaid that this judgement shall be credited with the sum of *531.00, This the 28th day of Feb., 192 J. A. Hartness Clerk Superfor Court. CEEOC ARM~i era MaYaylapayatayasaa, CORE COCEEEEEERCEGE@ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. Statesville Lumber Company, a Corporation. vs. JUDGMENT J. E. Horton, This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court, on Monday, March 7th, and*bdbeing héardysand it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was duly issued bv the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Jan. 31st, 1927, and was personally served on the defendant on the 5th dav of Feb, 1927, and that a copy of the plaintiff's verified complaint was duly filed in the office of the Clerk on the 4rd day of February, 1927,: and a copy of said verified complaint served upon the defendant with the summons, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has not filed anv answer or 6éther pleading raising an issue of fact within twenty davs after the service of the summons and verified complaint upon the defendant, exclusive of the date of such service, and that the de- fendant has not filed any pleadings within twenty days from the return day fixed in said summons, And tt appearing that this is an action for an amount certain, as evidenced by promissory note underseal, and that the defendant, J, EB. Horton, is indebted to the Statesville Lumber Co. in the amount of $1000.00, with interest from Jan. 4th, 1919, at the rate of six per cent until paid, on account of said promissory note. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, J, E, Horton, the sum of $1000.00, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum, from the 4th dav of January, 1919, until paid, and the costs of this action, This March 7th, 1927, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. QLOFOEEAROOOREROOEE QOOCEEEOOKLOCO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday/ March 14, 1927 MARCH TERM North Carolina, In the Supebior Court, Iredell County. March Term,1927 Be it remembered that a Suverior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the first Monday after the first Monday in March, 1927, the same being the 34th day of March, 1927,A.D., when and where His Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the Fifteenbh Judicial Histrict, Spring Term 1927, is vresent and presiding. At this term for Civil cases only. M. P. Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and re- turned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this term of Superior Court, to-wit: H. T. Steele, John C, Temple- ton, R. G. Reynolds, John Regan, W. S. Page, W. M. Clark, G. W. Walker, W, F, Morrison, H. M. Cartner, 0. M. Turbyfill, A. C. West, F. T. Eidson, R, F. Lambert, C. F. Leckie, R. M. Morrow, Jr., C. B. Troutman, Sam L, Miller, and H. W, Watt, The following were excused for lawful causes: I, L. Wagner, The following were returned as not to be found in Iredell County.": . R. B. Levan, M. H. Williams, J. S. Johnston, M. O. Brown, and J. G, Wilhelm, North Carolina, Iredell County. Thomas Fov White Plaintir? vs. SSUES, Mary Orr White Defendant First: Were the Plaintiff and the Defendant married as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes, Second: Has the Plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina five (5) years next preceeding the commencement of this action? ANSWER: Yes, Third: Have the Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart for five (5) successive years next preceeding the commencement of this action, during which time the Plaintiff livea in North Carodina ANSTER: Yes, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, March Term 1927. Thomas Foy White Plaintiff vs. Mary Orr White Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 225 MARCH TERM 193% Monday, March 14, 192". This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and the Jury, and the Jurv having answer ed the following issues which were submitted to them by the Court as follows: to-wit: lst. Were the Plaintiff and Defendant married, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2nd. Has Plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina five years nest preceeding commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. 3rd. Has Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart for f five (5) successive years next preceeding the commencement of this action, during which time the Plaintiff lived in North Carolina. Answer: Yes. NOW, THER*FORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED BY THE COURT: lst. That the bonds of matrimony existing between the said Plain- tiff and said Defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved absolutely, and that said Plaintiff, Thomas Foy White, be and he is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with and from the said defené@ ant, Mary Orr White. ond. It is further ordered, adiudged and decreed by the Court the said plaintiff, be and he is hereby relieved and released of any and all liability and demand for maintenance and support of the said defendant, aw said defendant be and she is hereby denied all right of dower or any other interest whatsoever in and to the property, estate and belongings of said Plaintiff. 3rd. That the Plaintiff pay all the costs of this action to ve taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Michael Schenck JUDGE PRESTDING North Carolina, Tredell County. Margie Johnson Tolbert Plaintiff vs. ISSUES. Comar Tolbert Def endant First. Were Plaintiff and Defendant married as alledged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM L927 Monday, March 14, 1927, Second: Has Plaintiff been a bona fide resident of North Caroline five (5) years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes, Third, Has Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate ana apart for five (5) successive years next preceeding the commmencement of this action during which time Plaintiff lived in North Carolina? Answer: Yes, North Carolina, In the Superior Court ’ Iredell County. March Term 1927 Margte Johnson Tolbert Plaintiff Comar Tolbert t 4 { VS. : JUDGMENT, } Defendant $ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor r ™ ’ Michael Schench, Judge Presiding, and the Jury; and the Jury having answered the following issues which were submitted to them by the Court as follows ‘ . ¥ to-wit cs FIRST, Were the Plaintiff and Defendant married, as alledged in the complaint? ANSWER: YES, SECOND: Has the Plaintiff been a bona fidé resident of North Caro- lina five (5) years next preceeding commencement of this action? ANSWER: YES, THIRD. Has the Plaintir¢r and Defendant lived separate and apart for five (5) successive years next preceeding commencement of this action o during which tire Plaintiff lived in North Carolina? ANSWER: YES, Now, THEREPORE, IT IS ORDERKD, ADJUDGED AND DECREED RY THE COURT: it. 9 . That the bonds of matrimony existing between the said Plaint- arr a n and said Defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved absolutely. and . “9 that said + r 4 Plaintiff, Margie Johnson Tolbert, be snd she is hereby granted an absolute di . . vorce from the bonds of matrimony with and from the Defendant, Comar Tolbert, 2nd. That t at the Plaintirr bay all costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, Michael Schenck Judge Presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR COURTZ MARCH TERM Monday, March 14, 1927, North Carolina, Iredell County. Nell Johnson Hughes Plaintiff va. ISSUES. Owen Hughes Defendant First. Were Plaintiff and Defendant married as alledged in the complaint? ANSYER: Yes. Second. Has Plaintiff been bona fide resident of North Carolina five (5) years next preceeding the commencement of this action? ANSWER: Yes. Third, Has Plaintiff and defendant bhived separate and apart for give (5) successive years next preceeding the commencement of this action during which time Plaintiff lived in North Carolina? ANSWER: Yes. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927. Nell Johnson Hughes Plaintiff VS. Owen Hughes Defendant This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor ) d 4 § JUDGMENT { : § Michael Schenck Judge Presiding, and the Jury; and the Jurv having answered . the following issues which were submitted to them by the Court as follows, to-wit: First. Were the Plaintiff and defendant married as alledged in the complaint? Answer. Yes. Second. Has the Plaintiff been a bona fiaé resident of North Carolina five (5) vears next preceeding commencemant of this action? Answer: Yes, Third: Has the Plaintiff and Defendant lived separate and apart for five (5) successive years next preceeding commencement of this action, during which time Plaintiff lived in North Carolina? Answer, Yes. NoW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORD@RED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED BY THE COURT: ist. That the bonds of matrimony existing between said Plaintiff and said Defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved absolutely, md that said Plaintiff Nell Johnson Hughes, be and she is hereby grenres © opaoren Givoree from the bonds of matrimony with and from the defendant Owen Hughes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, 298 MARCH TERM 1927 F Monday, March 14, 1927. ond. That the Plaintiff pay all the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Michael Schenck Judge Presidi ng North Carolina, In the Supérior Cowt, Iredell County. March Term, 1927, Arrie Murdock Piaintiffr V8. 188 UE 8, Clarence Murdock Defendant 1. Dic the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 9 2. Did the defendant comrit adultery, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two consecutive vears prior to the commencement of this action, Answer: N a+ Car 14 ‘orth Carolina, In the Superior Cort, Zz wy 4 ‘ ’ o redell County. March Perm, 1927. Laura Smith, Fisinéier ¥8e ISSUES, Karl Smith, Defendant 1. Did the vlaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 2, Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and have plaintiff and a efendant live separate and apart from each other for five consecutive years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes, B. - +s Hae the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Car 1 Olina for more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action, : Answer: Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM 1927 Monday, March 14, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927. A. W. Dula, Plaintiff vs. Te North Carolina State Optometric Society, and N. Rosenstein, Leona Allen, Sam Levy, Sam Robinson, V. R. Newborn, L. H. Allen, N. C. Little, R. G. Stone, A. P. Staley, Robert N. Walker, W. W. Parker, H. M. Van Sleen, W. B. Morris, G, L. Lang, F. C. Roberts, H. R. Martin, F. E. Starnes, A. G. Spingler, R. C. ticPherson, John D. Perry, and R. H. Leonard. JUDGMENT ec Oe ne aa a See ee Deferdants This cause now coming on to be heard at this March Term 1927 of Iredell Superior Court, before his Honor, Michael Schenck, and it appearing to the court that the parties have agreed upon terms of settlement; It is now, i: consideration of such agreement, considered and adjudged by the Court that the pretended expulsion of the plaintiff from the defendant Society at itsmmeeting in Greenville, South Carolina, on Monday, June 23rd, 1924, was illegal; It is further considered and adiudged that by reason of the failure of plaintiff to tender and vay his annual dues in the defendant Bociety since said June 23rd, 1924, that his membership in said Society has terminated, and he is no longer a member thereof; It ig further considered and adjudged that the defendants pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding By Consent: Lewis & Lewis, H. KE, Lewis W. C, Newland, Squares & Whisnant Attorneys for Plaintiff Grier & Grier Self & Bagly Attornevs for Defendants This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, March 15, at 9:30 o'clock, A. M. een J North Carolina. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM, 1927 Tuesday, March 15, 1927, This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment Tuesday morning, March 15, 1927, at 9;30 o'cloc, A. M. for the dispatch of business, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell. County. Je F.. Horton vs. ORD ER W. A. Bristol, Surviving Trustee, 0 and Statesville Inmber Company, 4 a corporation. 4 This cause coming on to be heard upon the Restraining Order hereto. fore issued returnable before the undersigned Judge at Statesville, on Monday, the 14th day of March, 1927, and it apvearing to the Court that there is a question of act involved which requires a trial by jury; It is, therefore, ordered that the Restraining Order heretofore issued be, arid the same is hereby continued without prejudice to e&ther party until this matter 18 finally heard and determined on its merits, It is funther ordered that the plaintiff J. P. Horton, is to give a good and sufficient bond, in the sum of $560.00, to save harmless the de- fendants by reason of any damages they may sustain by the continuance of this Restraining Order, In the event that the said J, P, Horton fails to give said $500.00 bond on or before the 19th day of March, 1927, then this Restr- aining Orcer is hereby dissolved, This the 14th day of March, 1927. _ Micheel Schenck Judge Presiding This caserissordered Placed on the Calendar for trial at the May Term, 1927, first week, Schenck, Judge Noa th Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927 + , s % ° Laura Smith Wee JUDGMENT Esrl Smith of Iredell County, and being heard before his Honor, Mschael Schenck, Judge presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, a8 set out in the record; It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds oF matrimony heretofore sxiwteng between the plaintir? and defendant be and the sar ame are hereby disolved and the plaintiff is 2rantéed and absolute di fr . om the defendant. It is further adiudged that the plaintiff pay the ¢¢ of this action, —_. Michael Schenck Judge Pres ng IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MARCH TERM 1927 Tuesday, Marc 15, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927. Arie Murdock VSe JUDGMENT Clarence Murdock This cause coming on to be hearddat this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues sub- mitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the de- fendant, as set out in the record; It is therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and the same are hereby disolved and the plairtiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is fruther adjudged that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. —__Michael Schenck _ Judge Presiding. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday morning, Mardh 16, at 9:30 o'clock, A. M, 7 L4A_Ch_ yuage Presi tine and Holding Courts for Fifteenth Judicial District, North Carolina. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM, 1927, North Caroling, Iredell County. I, John Cleveland Sharpe, do solemnly swear that I will support the constitution of the United States; so help ms, God. John C. Sharve Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 14th dav of March, 1927. __. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding 15th Judicial District, I, John Cleveland Sharpe, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the state of North Carolina, and to the consitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and de. fend the constitution of said state, not inconsistent with the consitution of the United States, to the best of my knowledge and ability; so help me, God, _ John C, Sharpe Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 14th day of March, 1927, _._._— Michael Schenck Judge Presiding 15th Judicial District. I, John Cleveland Sharpe, do swear that I will truly and honestly de- mean myself in the practice of an attorney, according to the best of mv knowledge and ability; so help me, God, John C. Sharpe Sworn to and subséribed before me, this the 14th day of March, 1927, Michael Schenck Judze Presiding 15th Judicial District. North Carolina, In tne Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term, 1927. Mr. John Cleveland Sharpe having presented in open Court a license signed by the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, dated January 51, 1927 authorizing him to practice as an attorney and Counsellor at law in the Courts of this State, and he having taken and subscribed to the oaths required of Attorneys at law in this State. It is ordered and adjudged that the said John Cleveland Sharpe be, and he is admitted to the practice of the profession of Attorney and Counsel lor at Law in all Courts of this State. It is further ordered anc adjudged by this Courtthat a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread upon the Minutes of this Court of this State, This the 14th day of March, 1927, Michael Schenck Judge Presiding. day, March 16, 1927, a | Lee ete oegenea Loe ag td Ad, MEEK IETF, AFF SUGP AY Ch forrey IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM 1927, Wednesday, March 16, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredel 1 County. March Term 1927. J. O. Gaither ' vs. { 4 Statesville Lumber Company This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, upon motion of the defendant to require the plaintiff to furnish the defendant with a full bill of partie culars, showing the date and amount of payments which plaintiff alleges has been made him by the def-ndant, and credited on his account sued on in this action, and to furnish the defendant the amount of lumber out and hacked at each mill vard on the Cowles place, and being heard; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plait tiff furnish the defendant a verified itemized statement from his records of each payment made him, together with the date of vayment (if his records show the date), the aggregate of said vayments amounting, as plairtiff alleges in his complaint, to $28,250.00, and also furnish a verified itemized statement from his records of the lumber cut and hacked on esch mill vard on the Cowles land. This March 16th, 1927. ____Michael Schenck Judge Presiding. a ee ee North Carolina, Iredell County. Henkle-Craig Livestock Company, Incorporated, V8. ISSUES F, P, Jennings, R. D. Jennings, and W. R. Gregg Ques. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiffs as alleged in the complaint, if so in what amount? Answer: $286.50 with interest from December 4, 1925. North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927. F. J. Ostwalt ' i vs. ' JUDGMENT j ' J, 8, Stearns This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and being heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and it IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM, 1927, shri Beiterr) Mareh 16, 1927. PLD TELIA COIL Y Gortgoey Nort MEAG Ls na, Iredell County. I, John Cleveland Sharpe, do solemnly swear that I will supnort the constitution of the United States; so help me, God, John C,. Sharve Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 14th dav of March, 1927 _._. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding 15th Judicial District. I, John Cleveland Sharpe, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the state of North Carolina, and to the consitutional powers and authoritie. which are or may be established fop the government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and dee fend the constitution of said state, not inconsistent with the consitution of the United States, to the best of my knowledge and ability; so help me, God, _ John C, Sharpe Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 14th day of March, 1927, _. _.._— Michael Schenck Judze Presiding 15th Judicial District, I, John Cleveland Sharpe, do swear that I will truly and honestly de- mean myself in the practice of an attorney, according to the best of mv knowledge and ability; so help me, God, John C. Sharpe Sworn to and subséribed before mé, this the 14th day of March, 1927. Michael Schenck _ Judse Presiding 15th Judicial District. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term, 1927. Mr. John Cleveland Sharpe having presented in open Court a license signed by the Chief Justice and Assoctate Justices of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, dated Januyry 31, 1927 authorizing him to practice as an attorney and Counsellor at law in the Courts of this State, and he having taken and subscribed to the oaths required of Attorneys at law in this State. It is ordered and adjudged that the said John Cleveland Sharpe be, d he is and he is admitted to the practice of the profession of Attorney and Counsel- lor at Law in all Courts of this State, a t is further ordered ana adjudged by this Courtthat a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread upon the Minutes of this Court of this State, This the 14th day of March, 1927, Michael Schenck nee, Judge Presiding. ; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM 1927, Wednesday, March 16, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredel 1 County. March Term 1927. J, 0. Gaither § vs. : 4 Statesville Lumber Company This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, upon motion of the defendant to require the plaintiff to furnish the defendant with a full bill of partie culars, showing the date and amount of payments which plaintiff alleges has been made him by the def*ndant, and credited on his account sued on in this action, and to furnish the defendant the amount of lumber out and hacked at each mill vard on the Cowles place, and being heard; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plair tiff furnish the defendant a verified itemized statement from his records of each payment made him, together with the date of vayment (if his records show the date), the aggregate of said payments amounting, as plaintiff alleges in his complaint, to $28,250.00, and also furnish a verified itemized statement from his records of the lumber cut and hacked on each mill vard on the Cowles land. This March 16th, 1927. ___ Michael Schenck Judge Presiding. North Carolina, Iredell County. Henkle-Craig Livestock Company, Incorporated. Vs. ISSUES F, P, Jennings, R. D. Jennings, and W. R. Gregg PAS Ques. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiffs as alleged in the complaint, if so in what amount? Answer: $286.50 with interest from December 4, 1925. North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927, F, J. Ostwalt vs. JUDGMENT J. S. Stearns This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and being heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and it : IN THE SUPFRIOR COURT, 234 MARCH TERM 1927, Wednesday, March 16, 1927, appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have compromised all matters of difference between them, and that the terms of ssid compromise have been fully performed; It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plain- tiff take nothing by reason of his writ and that the defendant pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding By Consent: _ Lewis & Lewis Attornevs for Plaintiff ___ Grier & Grier Attornevs for Defendant North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927, C, H. Gant and Jim Milstead, trading and doing business as G. & M. Servide Station was JUDGMENT Fred Chambers t appearing to the Court that the parties herein have compromised on all matters in controversy in this action; defendant agreeing to pcy plain- tiffs the sum of Forty Dollars in full settlement of all demands made by the plaintiffs against the defendant, which plaintiffs agree to accept as a full discharge of all claims and demands against the defendant: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum of Forty Dollars, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. __Michaél Schenck __ Judge Presiding By Consent: Lewis *% Lewis Attorneys for Plaintiffs Grier & Grier Attornevs for defendant. IN THE SUPERIOR COURTZ MARCH TERM 1927, Wednesday, March 16, 1927. North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Tredell County. March Term 1927, Miss Ida Head VS. JUDGM ENT Pauh Baker This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and be- ing heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties have compromised and settled all matters involv- ed in this litigation, end that the terms of compromise have heen complied with It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the compromise entered into between the plaintiff and defendant be and the ssme is hereby approved and confirmed and adjudged binding uvon the parties, and that the pix plaintiff take nothing further in this action; It is further adjudged that the def mdant vav the cost bo be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Michael Schenck Jucge Presiding By Consent: Lewis & Lewis Attornevs for Plaintiff Grier “© Grier & J. H. Burke Attornevs for Defendant North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927. J. O. Gaither $ VS. { t { Statesville Lumber Comrany This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that this is a proper case for reference and should be referred, and that the varties have agreed that the same be referred, both plaintiff and defendent, reserving the right to a trial by jury; It is considered, ordered and adjudged that be and he is hereby appointed Referee, who will hear the matter at Statesvillg¢ N. C., after giving notice to the resvective parties or their attorneys and report his findings of facts and conclusion of the law, according to the pract ice of the Court. Michael Schanck Judge Presiding. 936 IN THE SUPRRIOR COURT, MARCH TERM 1927, Wednesday, March 16, 1927. State of North Carolina, In the Superior Court , Iredell County. March Term, 1927, J. W. Redmon and M, E, Redmon, trustee and Chas, C. Tharpe and A. J. Anderson and Bristol Tharpe, trustee and W. A. Bristol and T. N. Brown and D, L, Brown trading as T. N. Brown and Son. Plaintiffs JUDGMENT, vs. Jane Sowers or M, J, Sowexss This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that all matters in controversy have been settled and agreed upon now upon motion of attorney for the plaintiffs and by consent of Z. I. Walser, attorney for defendant; It is ordered and adjudged that the vlaintiff, J. W. Redmon recovers indgment against the defendant for the sum of $6541.62 and interest thereon from the 4rd day of September, 1925 until paid and that Charles C, Tharpe recover judgment against the defendant for the sum of $1409.72 with interest thereon from the 3rd day of September, 1925 nntil naid; that it 8&8 aditnudged that the following lands be sold at the Court House Door at Statesville, on the 18th day of April, 1927, after Aya aAaver gem - A . « fue advertisement, to-wit: 124 acres adjoining the lands of John Sowers et al and fully described as follows: 4 . ‘ irst Tract: Adjoining the lands of John Sowers, Mrs. Nicholson, F, I Sharpe 9 ° to & a 2a ° nr , . and others: Beginring at a vine, Sharpes corner; thence S, 89 E. 217 poles toa stone; t¢ :e ear 8 one; thence N, B, 217 poles to a stone, Victors corner, also John Sowers corner; hen S " thence S, 78 ", 102 poles to a stone; thence S, 9 poles to a small pine: thence N i) a 88". 52 poles to a hickory in Hayes line; thence S. 2 W. to the beginning contain- i 2 "A ra . ac ng 124 acres mo or less, and being the Southend of the W. C. Sowers homestead and be 4 “A qQ eing allotted to M, J. Sowers in the division of the lands of her father. Se : ; econd Tract; Adjoining the above tract, bounded on the N. by Matt Houpe, on the . é vu oy E. ov W Jt > Q 7 : 111 Davis, on the §S, by E. M. Yount, on the N, by John Summers and the first tract : . ; ‘ above described containing 43 acres, more or less, and being allotted to Jane Sowers in the division of the lands of her mother, S. R, Sowers B oth of the above described tracts of land being in Bethany Township, Iredell County: That hat John Lewis, Es@. is hereby appointed commissioner to make thé sale above sth set forth; and it b& further ordered and adjudged thatout of the pro- ceeds of t S§ re he said sale that the said commission pay J. A, Hartness, C.S.C. of Ire- é ” e 4 + ee ° dell County t £ +6 ¢ y the sum of $560.00 for the benefit of the defendant, Jane Sowers; that »’ 9» he is to pay the cost of this she action to be taxed by the Clerk andppay the vaasnoé this plaintiffs acc according to the priorities of their claims. And it is adjudged thet said payment nt to said plaintiff shall be in full of said claims of plaintiff This March 16, 1927, Michael Schenck By Consent: Judge Presiding. WY. A, Bristol . Attorney for Plaintiffs T, B. Walser Attorney for Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. 237 MARCH TERM, 1927. G. F. Mills. vs. Mooresville Cotton Mills, Inc. Continued by consent. R. W. Zeigler, vs. J. F. Combs, Lelia Combs and W, P., Carpenter Continued by consent. ’ Clarence Mayhew, vs. R. M. Washam. Continued. Ww. D. Turner, Admr. vs. W. BE. Selby. Continued. Dallas A. Shafer Co., vs. G. & M, Service Station. Continued. J. L. Shimpox, trading as Shimpox Bros., vs. Jf P. Kennerly. Continued by consent. Jas. H. Cloaninger, vs. Espy J, Collins, Admr. Continued by consent. Sherrill Motor Co., vs. J. G. Clark and J. H. Ramsey. Continued. Te Atlantic Paint Co., vs. Mooresville Furniture Co. Continued by consent. R. S. Wilhelm vs. C. R. Readling, et al. Continued by consent. L. Ellis tiaves, Admr. of M. L. Campbell, dec'd, vs, Columbus Campbell, et al. Continued. Mrs, Lovise Haves, vs. Columbus Campbell, et al. Continued. Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N. C. vs. D. A. Beam and Le A. Beam, Continued. J. H. McElwee vs. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co. Continued, A, J. Keller and wife, Fannie Keller vs. Charles Hicks and wife, Geno- lie Hicks, Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs. R. L. Church and C. 8. Grant. Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs. Epps Harris and Ed, Nicholson, Continued. Jas. C. David, (Director General of Railways. Sou. Ry. Co.) V8. Cleveland Manufacturing Co. Continued, Jas, C. Davis, Director General of Railways (Sou. Ry. Co.) vs. Statesville Veneer Co. Continued. L. Bs Hollar vs. Jesse Miller. Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs. L. "%. Westmoreland. Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs. N. G. Holmes, Dorsett Fraley and W, R, Holmes Continued, Statesville Lumber Co. vs Dorsett Fraley, N. G. Holmes and L. H. Fraley, Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs. N. G. Holmes, J. L. Holmes and W, R. Holmes, Continued. Mrs. M, E, Westmoreland vs. J. A. Westmoreland, Continued. J. A, Westmoreland vs. Mrs. M. &. Westmoreland, Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs. N. G. Holmes. Continued, Hillard Summers vs. Gertrude Summers, Continued. Bank of Stony Point vs. D. D. Littlefohn, Margaret Brawley, Admrx. R. V. Brawley. Continued. C. B. Freeze, vs. Mrs. John L. Lowe. Continued. W. W. McGowan, et al vs. Walter Beckham, et al. Continued. D. Shuford vs. W. R. Hart, Summers & McAuley and Stearns Bros., Continued, Ww. CG. Moore Vs. Dd. G. Wilson. Continued. Statesville Lumber Co. vs. J. T. Chappell and Alice Chappell, Continued, n Co., v8. Stearns Bros, Inc, and Glove Indem- _ Tri-State Transportatio oe nity Co. Continued, J. B. Colt Co. vs. E. Pruett Hager. Continued, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM, 1027. Carl H. Mathis vs. Cleo Mathis. Continued. Lottie B, Alley vs. Robert B, Alley. Continued. J. C. Brookshire vs. McQueen Fours and wife, Continued, P, P, Dulin, Receiver Carolina Stone Co. vs. Stearns Bros., Inc, Con't, Joe Byers vs. Sarah Byers. Continued. L. C. Atwell vs. Southern Railway Co, et al. Continued, Celeste Billingsley, et al vs. City of Statesville. Continued, Mrs. Beda Ost vs. Ellen Nilson. Continued. J. G. Shelton vs. Hand Medicine Co. Continued. A. L. Watts vs. Hand Medicine Co. Contintad. 7, D. Turner vs. Hand Medicine Co. Continued, Cavde Sharpe vs. Etta Sharpe. Continued, Link-Pickens Publishing vs, C. L. Gilbert. Continued, Link-Pickens Publishing vs. C. J. Jones. Continued, Link-Pickens Publishing vs. £, Ross Alexander, Continued, Link-Pickens Publishing va. C. B. Parker, Continued, Link-Pickens Publishing vs. Ross V. Allev. Continued, Link-Pickens Publishing J. K. Morrison Gro. & Prai Co. Con't, Link-Pickens Publishing Co. vs. J. R. Alexander, Continued. Link-Pickens Publishing Co. vs. L. Gordon. Continued. Link-Pickens Publishing Co. vs. D. B. Stearns. Continued. J. A. Davidson vs. C, W. Gilleland. Continued. C. H. Turner and U. S, Casualty Co. vs. J. W. Grogg. Continued. Mrs. A, P, Grace vs, Tryon Develovment Co., et al. Continued. Pope-Tire & Battery Co. vs. D. B. Stearns. Continued. R. L. Shuford vs. M. B. Travis. Continued, Mary C. Summers vs. M. D, Tilley. Continued, Elkin Hdw. Co. vs. M, T. Cockie, Stearns Bros., Inc, et al Continued. E. B. Brinkley vs. Walter Mavhew. Continued, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM 1927, Wednesday, March 16, 1927, STATE OF NORTH CARG@LINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF HENDERSON, MARCH TERM, 1927. A. S. Alley VB. (Two cases ORDER OF THE COURT AS TO Consolidated) REPORT OF REFEREE. J: A, Ferry and Cc. A. Hartline This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Judge upon exceptions to the report of the Referee, Honorable W, D, Turner, filed by both the plaintiff and defendants, the Court modifies the 14th Finding of Fact of the Referee so as to read as follows, to-wit: "13th. It is found as s fact that the vartnership (composed of the plaintiff and defendants), in the first cause of action, is tndebted to the plaintiff, A. S. Alley, in the sum of $523.73 ($420.73 plus $103.00), wit interest on said amount from May 28, 1922, until paid, ane that the said partnership, in the second cause of action; is indebted to the plaintiff, A. S, Alley, in the sum of $3388.35." Te Court modifies the lst Conclusion of Law of the Referee ao as to read as follows, to-wit: "3st. It is found as a matter of law that the plaintiff, A. 8S. Alley, is entitled to judgment, in the first cause of action, against the partnership (composed of plaintiff anc defendants) in the sum of $523.73 ($420.73 plus $103.00), with interest from the 28th day of Mary, 1928, until is entit led to judgment, in a paid, and that the said plaintiff, Ac 8. Alloy, " the second cause of action, against saic partnership in the sum of $3388.35. The Court ratifies and affirms all other Findtnges of Fact and Con- clusions of Law of the Referee. Michael Schenck Juage Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term 1927. A. 8S. Alley v8. (Two cases Consolidated) ( ( Perry and Hartline. This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court and being heard before His Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presi di ng upon report of the Referee as modified by the Court at this Term of the Cout; It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, A. S. Alley, recover of the partnership composed of A. 8, Alley, : J. A. Perry and C. A. Hartline, the sum of THREE ®HOUSAND Ning HUNDRED T cLY. and 8/100 ($3,912.08) DOLLARS, with interest on $525.75 from the 28th May, 1922, until paid; ent ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARCH TERM 1927., ZH¥O Wednesday, March 16, 1927. ; her considered and adjudged that C, A, Hart rth Carolina eo artline recover ” : In the Superior Court. of the partnership composed of A. S. Alley, J. A. Perry and C, A, Hartline, Iredell County. IK THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTYTHREE ($1,983.00) DOLLAR: . L. Seronce, W. D. Turner, Vinton er gs —, ridden Pickens and R. 8S; Péckens, on pehalf of themselves and all other stockholders and creditors who may come It is further considered and adjudged that the partnership composed in and make themselves parties plaintiff in this action. interest from the 9th dav of November, 1925, until paid; RECEIVER'S _REPORT of A. S. Alley, J. A. Perrv and C, A, Hartline recover of J, A, Perry the sum Vs EN DOLLARS; . ey Link-Pickens Publishing Company, Cornora- It is further considered and adiudged that Hon. W. D. Turner be tion. 60 and he is hereby allowed the sum of $ Lb 0-8 Referee in this case, and that Miss Rachel King be allowed the sum of $25.00 as stenographer in said ACI A MI I a EC ne OR RECEI ‘Cash taken in while opersting under temporary Receivership, case, and that the sum so allowed the Referee and Stenographer be taxed as February lst to February 14th. 4259.85 Rec. from First Nit. Bank varPt of the cost in this action. 7 ‘Link-Pickens account 18,32 It. is considered and adindged that the cost of this action be taxed R Peoples Loan & Savings Bank ec.:-reo a said : against the/partnership, to-wit: A. S, Alley, J. A. Perry and C, A. Hartline, Jno. A. Scott, Trustee 48.97 Rec. of Jno. A. Scott, Agent, Link- Pickens Publishing Co., collection of Michael Sche eee stock subscriptions 195.01 Judge Presiding. : . 713.52 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Collected from open accts. on books 2 Rec. Commercial Ntl. Bank, Link- Pickens acct. 202 Henkel Craig Livestock Cornany : Incornorated, , Total $1,232.99 Iredell County. March Term 1927. vs. JUDGM ENT DISBURSEMENTS F, P, Jenning, R.D, Jennings and ), RR. Grage Preferred claims paid on wages and expenses of Receiver: THIS CAUSE coriing on to be heard before His Honor, Michael Schenck, Total &352.77 Judge and Jurv at this term of the Court, and they Yury having answered the Balance in People's Loan & Savings Bank $ 880.22 issues submitted to them in the record, in favor of the plainti?fs. IT IS THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, OREDERED, and ADJUDGED, that the Notice of sale published in Statesville Daily, Greensboro Daily News, pleintiff oieintiff the Henkel Craig Live Stock Company recover of the defendant F. P. server and the Asheville Citizen, Winston-Salem Journal, Raleigh News and Ob Jennings as princinal and R. D, Jennings and VW. R. Gragg as sureties, the notices with inventory mailed to the @ifferent job printers SIX Also 75 circulars sum TYO HUNDRED KIGHTY/DOLLARS AND FIPTY CENTS ($286.50) with interest from in North Cerolina 5, at the rate of six percent per annu, and cost A. Collier This March 14, 1927. _Robert A. Collier _ RECEIL VER the 4th day of December, 192 of action to be texed by the Clerk, Michael Schenck Judge Presiding Fifteenth Judicial District. Approved and ordered filed, March 14, 1927. Michael Schenck Judg? 249 State of North Carolina, In the Superior Comm ’ County of Iredell Before the Clerk. The Federal Land Bank of Columbia, Plaintiff 4 { ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND ORDER ( OF FORECLOSURE, { § ; vs. C. B. Stewart and wife, Addie B, Stewart and the Statesville National ( Farm Loan Association. Defendants This matter coming before me upon motion of the Plaintiff's attorney to vacate the Judgment and Order of Foreclosure heretofore made in this action on the 2lst day of February, 1927, and to reinstate the mortgage of the defend. ant, C. B,. Stewart and wife, Addie B. Stewart to the plaintiff upon the ground that a satisfactory settlement has been effected Without a sale of the property, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, with the consent of all parties to the action: 1. That the Judgment and Order of Foreclosure made herein on the 23rd day of August, 1926 be, and the same is, hereby vacated, set aside and with- drawn from the records of the Court; ilk, That the mortgage of the defendant, C. B. Stewart and wife, Addie B. Stewart, to the plaintiff, which is fully described in the Complsint, be, and the same is, hereby, reinstated and restored to its original status of prior- ity, force and effect, the same as though this action had never been institued and the decree had never been made; lll. That the Clerk of Court do note upon the Lis Pendens and the record thereof an appropriate reference to this order; 1V. That the action be dismissed upon payment of all the costs. The 14th day of March, 1927, J. A. Hartness ~ Clerk Sunertior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina. mw @ consent: J. _W, Sharpe Plaintiff's | Attorney Statesville National Farm Loan Association By I. N, Paine, Pres. _ rs Attest: H. V, Fu ches, Sec-Treas, © C. B. Stewart _ Addie B. Stewart _ h Carolina, Nort In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Te Merchants and Farmers Bank, Inc, vs. JUDGMENT Lula B. Owens, Duke C, Overcash, Bruce Overcash, I. M. Overcash, W. J. Overcash, end S. L. Overcash. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on Monday, April llth, 1927, and it apvearing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on March and served on March 15th, 1927, by reading and delivering a copy of and it further 12th, 1927, the summons and a cony of the complaint on each of the defendants; appearing to the Court that a duly verified complaint was filed in said cause on the 15 day of March, 1927; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants are fndebted to the pleintiff in the sum of Three Hundred Dollars, to- gether with interest from Nov. 30th, 1926 at the rate of 6% per annum until paid; and it further annearing that said amount is evidenced by a promissory note exe- cuted by the Gefendants to the paaintiff, the terms of which note are set out in the verified complaint filed in this cause; and it further appearing that the de- fendants, nor any of them, have filed an answer or demurrer in the time allowed by law: lt is therefore ordered andadjudged that the plaintiff recover of the de- fendants the sum of Three Hundred Dollars with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from Nov, 30th, 1926 until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed by this Court against the defendants. This ith dey of April, 1927. J. A. Hartness Clerk Surerior Cort COPEAOOEMOCOMOAR™ CHOECEC@OCOCL RAGA North Caroli arolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. The Merchants and Farmers Bank, Inc. vs. JUDGMENT Wed, Overcash, Bruce Overcash, I. M. Overcash, Duke C. Overcash, Lula Be Owens and S. L. Overcash. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior of Iredell County on Monday April llth, 1927, and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on March 12th 1927, ané served on March 15th 1927 by reading ard delivering a copy of the summons #ni- & Copy of the complaint on each of the def mdants; and it further appearing to the Court -that a duly verified complsint was filed in said cause on the 15 Gay | of March 1927; and it further appearing to the Court thet the defendants are in- 244 debted to the plaintiff in the sum of Four Hundred Dollars, together with tn. terest fpom Nov. 20th 1926 at the rate of 6% per annum until paid; aha tt further apnearing that said amount is evidenced by a promissory note executed by the defendants to the plaintiff, the terms of which note are set out in the verified complaint filed in this cause; and it further appearing that the defendants, nor any of them, have filed an answer or demurrer in the time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of Four Hundred Dollars with interest at the rate of 6% per annum for Nov. 30th, 1926 until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed bv this Court against the defendants, This llth day of April 1927, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court CEQCOCARGK MOOORHAQQGE CEC@EEE@E@ @@RAG North Carolina, In the Sunerior Court, Iredell County. The Merchants and Farmers Bank, Ine, ( VS. Bruce Overcash, Duke C. Overcash, I. M, Overcash, Lula B. Owens, W. J C « Owens ‘ - Overcash and S. L. Overcash, i : ) 4 ' JUDGMENT { § This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Supverior Court of Iredell County on Monday April llth 1927, and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on Mach 12th 1927, and served on March 15th 1927 by reading and delivering a copy of the sumrons anc a covy of the complaint on each of the defendants: and it further apneaning to the Court that a Gulv verified complaint was filed in said cause on the 15th day of March 1927; and it further avnearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the Plaintiff in the swum of Three Hundred Dollars, together with interest from Nov. 30th 1926 at the rate of 6% ver annum until vaid; and it further apréaring that ssia amount is evidenced by a promissory note executed by the defendants to the paaintiff, the terms of which note are set out in the verified complaint filed in this cause; and it further appear ing that t he defendants, snor any of them, have filed an answer or demurrer in the time allowea by law: It is t . 8s therefore order ed and adjudged that the Plaintiff recover of the def«nd ndants the sum of Three Hundred Dollars with interest at the rate of — 6% per 1 per annum from Nov. 30th 1926 until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed by this Court akainst the defendants This llth day of April 1927, J. A, Hartness s Clerk Superior Court. * QLKLEOERERHERERED HEE CREREE GO@OeREnanocG North Carolina, In the Sunerior Court, Iredell County. The Merchants and Farmers Bank, Inc, vs. JUDGMENT Duke C. Overcash, Bruce Overcakh, I. M, Overcash, Lula B. Owens, W. J. Overcash. and S. L, Overcash. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Sunerior Court of Iredell County, on Monday, Avril llth, 1927, and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on March 12th, 1927, and served on March 15th, 1927, by reading and delivering a copy of the summons and a copy of the complaint on each of the defendants; and it further apnearing to the Court that a duly verified complaint was filed in said cause on the 15th day of March, 1927; and it further apnearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Four Hundred Dollars, together with interest from Nov. 30tk, 1926 at the rate of 6% ver annum until paid; and it further apvesaring that said amount is evidenced bv a promi- ssory note executed by the defendants to the plaintiff, the terms of which note are set out in the verified complaint filed in this cause: and it further apnearm ing that the defendants, nor any of them, have filed an answer or demurrer in the tire allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of t he deferdants the sum of Four Hundred Dollars with interest ab the rate of 6% per annum from Nov, 30th, 1926 until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed bv this Court against the defendants. This lith day of Apria, 1927. J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court CAOEOROOOUEOEQCORME @FOOOERRQMAC North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, R. E. Hoke vs, 8. R. Morrison and Essie L. Morrison This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, April llth, 1927, and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on March 18th, 1927, and served on March 18th, 1927, by reading and delivering a copy of the summons, and a copy of the complaint to the defendants; and it appear- ing further to the court that a duly verified complaint was filed in said cause on the 18th day of March, 1927; and it further appearing to the court thet the 246 defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $500.00, together with tn. terest from the 14th day of November, 1925, at the rate of six per cent pep annum until paid, and it further appearing that said amount if evidenced by promi ssopy note executed by the defendant to the plaintiff the terms of which note are set out in the verified complaint filed in this cause: and it further apnearing that the defendants have not fifed an answer in the tine allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $500.00, together with interest at the rate of 81X per cen per annum from November 14th, 1925, until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed by this court against the defendante,. This April 11, 29°27, J. A. Hartness Clerk of Suvertfor Court. CRAC0 006 WRROARGWRC @Aiw CERBWMECEECOOECHW North Carolina, Iredell Countv. Statesville Hardware Co, vs ) C. K. Dantels and wife j Minna L. Danhels, ' This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that all things in controversy, have bean settled and adjusted between the parties, and it further appearing to the Court that the cost of this action has been paid, it is now ordered and adjudged that this action be and is hereby dismissed, _A. Hartness ee, Clerk Superfor Court. By consent: M. Land E. _—_—_ Attorney for Plaintiff 1 . he Bristol a “Attorney for defemdant BEOCEE, CEREREAAE ARE COE QCCEAECH@QQ / North Carolina, } Iredell County. | Statesville Brick Co, 4 vs ' JUDGMENT, c, Rk. Daniels and wife, } Minnia L. Danbels. ) This cause coming on to be heard and it apvearing to the Court that all things in controversy, have been sttled and adiusted betwwen the parties, ard it further avpearing to the Court that the cost in the action has been paid, it is now ordered and adjudged that this action be and is hereby dismissed, dé A. Hartness Clerk of Superior Court By consent: be M. Land Attorney for plaintiff We A. Bristol Rttorney for defendants C@OD INE TAOBRBOME @@Q." ANIA QACe 7 4 t North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk. Hazel Atlas Glass Company Inc. vs IU DGB ae. H. L. Austin, trading and doing business under the trade name and Style of Austin Candy Shop. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 12th day of March , 1927, plaintiff pro- cured a summons to be served against the defendant and at the same time filed > the in this Court its complaint duly verified, and attached a copy thereof to Summons to be served on the defendant; And it fubther appearing that sa‘d summons was returnable on the lst day of April, 1927, and that said summons, together with the copy of the complaint, was served on the defndant on the 12th day of March, 19273 And it further appearing that this is an action for the re- e covery of $268.32, with interest on $204.00 from June 18th, 1926 at the rat of six per cent, and interest on $64.32 from November 2nd, 1926, at = rate of six per cent, due the plaintiff by the defendant's failure to Gi said , ‘ 8a Sum agreeable to a contract for the purchase of merchandise from the Plaintirg evidenced by notes and an open account, all as set ovt in the complaint; And it further appearing that more than twenty days have eXx- pired since the service of summons and copy of complaint on the defendant and that defendant has failed to appear and answer or demur ; And it further appearing that the defendant is due the Plaing tiff the sum of $268.452-with interest on $204.00 from June 18th, 1926 at six per cent, and interest on 464.32 from November 2nd, 1926 at six ver cent: It is , therefore considered, adjudged and decreed that the : plairtiff recover of the defendant the sum of TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-EIGHT and 32/100 ($268.32) DOLLARS, with interest on %204.00 from FunembSbh, 1926 at the rate of six percent wntil paid, and interest on $64.32 from Wov- ember 2nd, 1926, at the rate 66 six percent until Paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. This the llth day of April, 1927, J. A, Hartness Clerk “upertor Court Tredell County CO] CCR@BRCEOQROEEO QQOO“ROD>7QECE ~* North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. State i PETITION FOR DISCHARGE FROM THE COMMON JAIL OF IREDELL v8. ( AND TO BE ALLOWED TO TAKE INSOLVENT DEBTOR'S OATH. Anaéfew Clark To J. A. Hartness, C. S. C., Iredell County: The petitioner, Andrew Clark, defendant in the ahove entitled cause would respectfully show to the court that he was convicted of bastardy before George Young, a justice of the peace of Iredell County on the charge of bastardy on the 12 day of March, 1927, that an allowance was adjudged due by him to Woodie Bell Young, the woman upon whom the bastard child was aliéeed to have been be- gotten and in default of being able to pay the allowance and cost or to give bora for the payment of the allowance and cost was committed to the common jail of Iredell where he has been incarcerated since the 19th day of March, 1927. The petitioner would further show that he has no property, either real or personal and that he has not disposed of any proverty since he had been in jail. Wherefore your petit ioner prays the court that he may be allowed to sub- scribe to the attached insolvent debtor's oath ane be discharged from prison ac- cording to law, Andrew Clark Andrew Clark being sworn deposes and savs that he has read the foregoing petition and the same is true of his own knowledge, information and belief, ex- cept as to those things therein set out on informstion and belief and as to those he believes it to be true, Andpew Clark _ Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 7th day of Apr., 1927. C. G. Smith Dept. G, 8. C. North Carolina, Iredell County. I, Andrew Clark, do solemnly swear that I have not the worth of fifty dollars in any worldly substance, in debts, money or otherwise whatsoever, and that I havdé not at any time since my imnrisonment or before, directly or indirect ly, Sold or assigned, or otherwise disposed of, or made over intrust for mvself or my family, any part of my real estate orpersonal estate, whereby to have or to expect any benefit, or to defraud any of my creditors: so help me, God. __Andrew Clark _ Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 7th dey of April, 1927. C. G. Smith Dept. ©. 5S. G. (250 North Carolina, Supérior Court » Iredell County. the Clerk, P, L, Kistler and R, L, Jenkins, partners doing business under the firm name of Statesville Roller Covering Company vs. Yadkin Cotton Mill This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, on the 25 day of Apr, 1927 and it appearing to the court that the Summons was issued in this action on March 25 1927, and that same, together with the copy of the Complaint filed therein was duly served on the said defendant by delivering a copy of said summons and complaint to R. D, Grier, President of the defendant, Yadkin Cotton Mill, on March 28 1927, and that said action is an action -to collect the amount due the plaintiffs by the defendant on an opén account, being certain Stated amounts, and that said complaint was duly verified on March 25 1927, and that the amount due plaintiffs by the defendant is $389.25 with interest on $215.76 thereof from Sept. 1 1926, and interest on $175.49 from Nov. 1 1926, and that the é@eferdant has failed and neglected to file an answer or demur in the time allowed by law: IT IS THEREFORE ordered end adjudged by the Cort that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $389.25 with interest on $213.76 thereof from Sent. 1 1926 at the rate of 6% per annum until paid, and interest on $175.49 thereof from Nov. 1 1926 at the rate of 6% per annum until paid, And it is further ordered ana adjudged by the Court that the defendant vay the cost of this action, This the 25th dav of April AD 1927, J. A. Hartness Bene Clerk Sunerior Court, redell County, NW. ¢. e-. : @@QQAAME *:: 3 ~ . North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. v, C. Schley, Trading under the name of Crescent Theatre, vs. United States Factories This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court by consent of both parties that the plaintiff in this action has come into Court and asked permission to take a voluntary non-suit, It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that this action be dismissed and the Warrant of Attachment heretofore granted in this cause be, and the same is hereby set aside and that the money levied on by the Sheriff , of Iredell County hereunder in the possession of the Southeastern Express Company be paid ovef to John A. Scott, attorney for the United States Factories, and that upon payment to him, the said Southeastern Express Co., shall be and is hereby discharged from any further liability. This the 2nd day of May, 1927. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court By consent: D. L. Ravmer Attorney for Plaintif?r John A, Scott Attorney for Defendant MPEMHAOEEOEORQOG@QRE GEC CE RCRNLEE \ 202 , Vy “Bowth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, R. M, Hix vs, GSUDGMENP? M. W. Gibson This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk, and it appearing = the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have compromised and settled their differences and that the defendant has paid the plaintiff the sum agreed upon as a full and complete settlement, and the plaintirr having come into Court before the Clerk and requested permission to take a voatntary non-suit; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintirr be and hé# is hereby non-suited, and that the said plaintiff be taxed with the cost of this action, This the 9th day of May, 1927, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County @Q2XCCOOEROOBQLEOOOMOEE COECOLAl CHCQ@OE@GO@ North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County, Commercial National Bank of Statesville, N. C, vs. JUDGMENT DEFAULT FINAL H. E. Hoover, A, A, Hoover and J. E. Hoover ee ef «8 e¢ ee) ee cf THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard and being heard, this Monday the 9th day of May, 1927, upon the complaint of the plaintiff, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Irede11 County, N.C. and it appearing that the defend- ants were duly served with & copy of the summons in this cause, on April first and fiftt respectively, 1927, and it ‘appearing further that the plaintiff's come Plaint was duly filed within the time requiréd by law, and it further appearing from said complaint, duly verified, that the plaintiff has a just cause of action, and that the amount of monies set out in said complaint as due the plaintiff upon a note under seal, is justly due said plaintiff, and the defendants hot having answered said complaint, IT I8 THERKFORE Considered, ordered and adjudged, that the plaintiff the. ap Commercial National Bank of Statesville, have Judgment against the defendant H. E. Hoover as Principal and A. A. Hoover and J. EB, Hoover as sureties in the sum of Five Hundred ninety eight dollars and ninety six cents, with interest on $575.00 from 29th day of March, 1927, Clerk, and cost of this case to be taxed by the J, A Hartness sd Clerk of the Superior Gear ——— eer ononrengeMeeRxina Carolina North ° In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Myles Salt Company, Limited V8. JUDGMENT ee cf ef «6 of of w. &. Selby, trading as the Selby Ice Cream Company This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that all matters in controversy have been settled and adjusted between the parties here- to and that the cost of action has been paid, It is now ordered and adjudged, by consent, that the plaintiff take nothing more of the defendant and that this action be and is hereby dismissed, This 10th day of May, 1927. J. A, Hartness By consent: Ge : Be: Ge Turner & Turner Attvs. for Plaintiffs By consent: E. M. Land Attv. for defendant QOCGCOCOCOEGOROGO@ C0C@@e@new @6@GG@uoe I In the Supertior Court North Carolina, In the Su; , Iredell County. § Before the Cle rk. Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co., a corporation. vs ) § JUDGYENT OF NON Q ) This cause cothéing on to be heard, and being heard, and it ap- pering to the Court that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the full amount due the plaintiff by the defendant, as set forth in the complaint filed in this action, and the plaintiff having come into court and asked Permission to take a voluntary non-suit; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action , be, and the same is hereby dismissed. This the 23th day of May, 1927. J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court. TE5E LEAESE TE SESE SESE ESET te Mesbse TRIES | TPSETEEESHE 4 North Carolina, sit Superi Iredell County. Parner COURS sae Mattie Thomas and Sallie Thomas V8. Thomas, Standard Mortgage Company, ‘ § ‘ { Laural Park Estates, Inc., 0. G, i i i j ' and Central Bank & Trust Co., Trustee This caus* coming on to be heard and being heard Katene the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina and i: ap Dearing to the Court that the summons in the above entitled cause was issued on the 10th day of February, 1927 and was made returnable before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court on the 28th daynof February, 1927, on which date the Plaintiff filed its duly verified complaint in the cause and that the answer of Central Bank and Trust Company, Trustee, and Standard Mortgage Company was duly filed in the office of the Clerk of the Suverior Court of Iredell County on the 17th day of March, 1927, That no answer has been filed by the Defendants, the Laural Park Estate, Inc. and 0, G. Thomas and that the time allowed by law for filing answer has expired and that one cuase of action set out in the complaint is for a stated amount, to-wit: Efght Hundred Thirty-three Dollars and sixnty-six cents ($833,66), with interest on the same from the 18th day of March, 1926 until paid. It is therefore ordered adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plain- tiffs be and they are hereby given judgment against the def mdants, Leural Park Estates, Ince. and O. G. Thomas in the sum of $833.66, with interest on the same from the 18th day of March, 1926, until paid and for the cost of this action, This the 16th dav of Mayy,1927,. _J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County WRMWMMCOCORWUGHAREQAZQ@O C§OCCE@LERQEERECERRO@E COCEECECECAEEHMEW North Carolina, Before G, R. Amderson, Iredell County, Justice of the Peace, Statesville Township. g, A. Harris and T. R. Harris VSe JUDGMENT Vincent J. Brown This cause coming on to be heard before G, R. Anderson, Justice of the Peace on the 12th day of April, 1927 and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the notice of this action, of the issuance of the summons and warrant of attachment stating names of the parties, the amount ofthe claim and in a brief nature of the demand and requiring the defendant to appear at the time and phace stated and answer or demur to the plaintiff's complaint has been duly published as required by law. And it further appearing to the Court that the summons and warrant of Attachment issued in this action have been duly served by the said publications: It is, therefore, found by the Court as a fact and the Court so ad- judges, that all things required by law have been done and preformed so as to bring this action before the Gourt. It is further ordered, considered and adjudged that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs due by account in the sum of $102.50, and interest on said amont from March 4, 1927, until paid, and for the cost of this action said cost being $4.05. It is further ordered by the Court that execntion be issued to the Sheriff of Iredell County or other lawful officer, commanding said Sheriff to levy upon the goods of the defendant set out in the inventory filed by the Sherif with the warrant of attachment and to satisfy said judgment out of said goods so levied upon, It is further ordered by the Court that this judgment be a specific lien upon said property attached by the Sheriff of Iredell County from and after the 12th day of April, 1927. This the 12th day of April, 1927. G. R. Anderson Pustice of the Peace C@CLEELELOOELO CAGE CQOBROCOBEHOGE @EOCE@E 256 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, T. Ross Alexander ) ) vs, ) ) ) Y. 8. White and B, M. Wilhelm ‘This Cause coming on to be heard before the Court, and being hearg upon the pleading and evidence introduced bv the plaintiff, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff caused to be issued from the Superior Court of Iredel} County on the a day of April, 1927, a summons returnableeonnthe 11th day of April, 1927, and it apvearing to the court that a copy of the plaintifrts veri- fied complaint was served upon the defendants, Y. S. White and B, M, Wilhelm, on April 6, 1927, and also a copy of the summons, and that the defendants have not filed anv answer @ made appearance in this action and no issue of facts with the jury having been raised by the defendant and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the service upon the defendants of the Ssummones and verified come Plaints, That this is an action upon 4 promissory note for an amount certain which can be arrived at by mathematical calculation, due by the defendant to the plain- tiffs: It is therefore ordered and ad{fudged that the plaintiff be given judgment against the def mndants, Collectively and individually, by default final for the sum of Three Hundred thirty-four Dollars and nineteen cents ($334.19) with in- terest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum until Paid from the 22nd day of Novem- ber, 1926, and for cost to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This 16 day of May, 1927, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court. CEOCRQQREMHADE @@@caa @@@@@@ \ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927, Hon. H3SHRS? iHeyeBSK> 1 duee Presiding Worth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell. County. - May Term, 1927, Be it remembered that a Sur rior Court begun and held in and @ for the State and County aforesaid, on the lithMonday after the lst Monday in March, 1927, the same being the Twenty-third day of May, 1927, A, D., when and where Hi@ Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the 5 15th JudicYel District, Spring Term, 1927, is present and presiding, and Honom ‘able Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M. P,. Alexander the High Sheriff of Iredell County is presen t and returned into open Court the naes of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term of the Supetior Court, to-wit: The following were2drawn and sworn as Grand-Jurors for the term: P. F, Beins te R, C, Little, A, J, Beaver, - T. Whitlow, E. C, Ervin, E, L, Goodin, W. E. Coley, R. A, White, S, B, Mayhew, James Brawley, H, C. Reece, S,. Grose, D. H. Lawson, S. S, Denny, D. A/ Miller, W, R. Holmes, L, A. Boggs, H. W. Lazenby, R. C, Little was appointed and sworn as foreman of the Grm 4d- Jurys 0, B, Lazenby appointed officer of the @rand-jury, J. M, Rash, N. A, Renegar and F. A. Black were retirned not to be found in Iredell County. W.L. Cook and J, W. Nicholson were execused for lawful causeg The foblowing were drawn and sworn as petty jurors for the weé BE, B. Young, R, D. Millsapss,W. T, Mills, Harry Ostwalt, R. L. Rimmer, W. L, Matheson, C. M,. Blackwelder, J, R. Winecoff, M, R. Niblock, M. D, Lewis, J. L, McLelland, and R, L. Bradford. C. A. Brady and A. F. Deal were sworn as talesman Yurors,. B. J. Ross, Jr. summoned as a Juror wax called and failed to answer was fined $40.00 and a Sci Fa ordered. Sheri ff M. P. Alexander returned the Sci Fa with the following notation, "Not to be found in Iredell County." No, 1 { FALSE PRETENSE. State The defendant having complied with the order of Court it is vs ' ordered that the defendant be discharged, R, 6, Kyles | No, 2 RTHLESS CHECKS. State : a epmaeee having complied with the order of Court it is ve. ordered that the defendant be discharged, R, 0, Kyles i A No, 8 { APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. State Nol Prossed with Leave. Robart Williams No. 4 TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR State | Nol Prossed with Leave. e £ Robert Rurr ' \ O5R \ \ Seve’ V8. Lewis Campbell no. © \ State v8. Hal W. Walker No. 9 State vs. June McLean No. 10 State VS. Epps Shaver NO. 91 State V8e Hooker Cornelius ne, 12 State V8. Lonnie Allen No. 21 State vs, Voy Mathis No. 20 State vs J. A. Snapps IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927, Monday, May 235, 1927, Hon, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, i t LARCENY. Alias Capias.and Continued, FALSE PRETENSE, Alias Capias and Continued, TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR, Continued under former order, TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LUQUOR, Nol Prossed with Leave, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Alias Capias and Continued, SELLING LIQUOR, Alias Capias and Continued, a peg AND LARCENY, ‘ e defendant comes into open Court and pleads guil to Storebreaking and L re : of Indi Seeeen gz arceny as charged in the Brit of It is orde Court that prayer rm of Two Years on the ‘ : a bond in. the sum of ersonal appearance at each May and November Criminal Term of the Sure rior Court of Tredell County for a term of Two Years including the May Term 1929 to show that he has been engaged in gainful employ- ment and has been of @00d: behavior, tIn the event of failure to comply with these conditions : upon judgment being prayed by the Solicitor for the : etc it is respectfully recommended thatthe defendant © imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of two years and assigned to work on roads, STOREBREAKING AND LARCENY, The 4 comes into open Court and ds L ro Seoeebas mandnd Larceny as charger 1p ne Bee it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defend- ant be imprisoned in the State Prison for a term of Years, oF * No. 13 State, vs John Rector No. 15 State vs, Carrie Steele IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Monday fay Ba" > 13857 MURDER Be it remembred that at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell ore icons May 23, 1927, and sitting for the dispatch of usiness, this the 23rd day of May, 1927 the Grand Jury of said Court ina bo 18 resent e- turned into open Court the following bai oF indictment in werds and figures as follows; INDICTMENT +- MURDER. State of North Gapodina, In the Superbob Coubt Iredell Coumtyv. May Term, A. D. 1927 The Jurors for the State upon their Oaths present: That John Rector late of the County of Iredel State of North Carolina, on the 7th day of ebruary A.D. 27 at and in said County and State with fobce and arms. felon- fously, wilfully, unlawfully and of his malice afore- thought did kill and murder Della Rector his wife contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State. __. ong. —«<=“‘( sy, BOhiCi£or. Endorsed on the back by the following words and figures, to-wit: No. 13 State vs John Rector es INDICTMENT MURDER ' » Pros. Bov. Witnesses J. S. Fleming X Mrs Mary Ketler X Raney Neen ts, Henry Stevenson Mrs Cora Sowess Mra Dessie Horton Mrs Nora Reavis Those marked X sworn by the undersigned foreman, and exanined before the Grand Jury; and this bill found, A TRUE BILL R. C. Little : Foreman of the Grand Jury. MURDER t this term of the Superior Court of Pe astt Conte. berinning May 25, 1987, ana sitting for the ( t Iredell h of business, this 25rd day of May, 1927, the Grand- sur or said Court in a body, 18 present, returned into open @ourt the following bill of indictment in words and figures as follows: INDICTMENT --MURDER State of North Carolina, ! In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 May Term A, D, 1927. for the State upon their Oaths present; That Garcis dnecie, deh: late of the County of Iredell on the 4th day of March, A. D, 1927 with force and arms at and $. tv aforesaid, wilfully, unla ly and felc bab neilae afore t aia kil agoh sage ids sojores pada, “Ender race ene of Ce ee ee a “—=—""" IN THE SUPERIOR COURT’ : MAY TERM, 1927 + Monday, May 23, 1927. Endorsed on the back by the following words WG Pt eures t » No. 15 State vs. * Carrie Steele “ae Omwit,; | INDICTMENT MURDER War, Pros. WITNESSES: C, L. Gilbert, Pélice/ - R. Kerr Stelle Keaton x’ Stamey Steele x Those marked x sworn by the undersigned foreman, fore the Grand Jury, and this bill found; and qxemined be- A TRUE BILL R. C. Little Foreman of the Grmd Jury No. 16 X FORNICATION AND ADULTRY. State } The defendant comes in Vs, €urney,and R, A, Espy Lambert i Warrant, Judament of the’ Coeee es gMCt kesttes tm the fendant is not guilty, No; 362 PROSTITUTION. ve. Nol Prossed with Leave, Espy Lambert i This Honorable Caurt tak 6s a recess until Tuesday morning, May 24, 1927, at 9:30 o'clock, A. M. : . EB THE 15th JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA/ * ss eh ; es i IN THE SUPERIOR COURT : . 21 MAY TERM 1927 Tuesday, May’24, 1927, Mis Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment 6n Tuesday morning, May 24, 1927, at 9@50 A. M. for the dispatch of business, No. 14 State V8e Jane Gibson No. 13 State VS. John Rector Q 0 f t ES Se es oe bet Jet HE MURDER . Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior Court of tredell County beginning May 25, 1927, and sitting for the dis- patch of business, this the 24bh day of May, 1927, the Grand- Jury of said Court in a body, 18 present, returned into open Court the following bill of indictment in words and figures as follows: : INDICTMENT --MURDER State of North Carolina, j In the Superior Court, Iredell County. t » May Term, A. D, 1927, The jurors for the State upon their oaths present: That Jane Gibsen late of the County of Iredell on the llth day of April, A. D. 1927, with force and arms at end in the County aforesaid, wilfully and* feloniously and of her malice aforethought did kill and murder one Ellard Brown against the form of the Statute in such ease made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State, Long Solicitor Endorsed on the back by the following words and figures, to#wit: Je at 8 cm Jane Gibson INIT CTNENT MURDER War. WITNESSES : Sandy Dalton x Pratt Scott x Clandin Scott x Earl Teasley Ed Falls Those marked x sworn by the undersigned foreman, and examined before the Grand Jury, and this bill found. A TRUE BILL R. C. Little Foreman of the Grand Jury TRDE nay ondies of the Court, the defendant, John Rector, in the custody of M. P. Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, was brought into open Court. The defendant not being represented by counsel, the Court designates and appointesMessrs. gohn G. Lewis and H. G. Mitchell to defend the defendant, John ector, charged in the Bill of Indictment of First Degree Murder, a capital offense, atid these gentlemen out of deference to the request of the Court indicated their willingness to assume this duty. Se Gan k an through his counsel, in open Court asks fo vented Se 26 ie in caaition to the regular jurors already summoned and the talismen already summoned, a list of which has been furnished to the defendant, and requests and agrees that said 25 veniremen be summoned from other townships than the township of Statesville, and, by consent, it is ordered, in they presence of his counsel and the presence of the Solicitor for, the State, that the Sheriff summon a venire.of 25 men from other — townships in Iredell County than Statesville yownshie, to be pe | appear at the courthouse in Iredell County at 2:50 o'clock, P. Be on Wednesday, May 25, 1927; and it is further ordered that ss copy of this order be furnished the Sheriff, which shall be for him a venire facias and his authority and fo ae said 25 jurors, as aforesaid, and t id rete = ve names of the jurors so summoned, » s return a his pre in court at the time and place afc ws. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Tuesday, May 24, 1927. 262 MURDER sie It is ordered that the County Physician, Dr. Ross McElwee, te an immediate examination of the defendant, John Rector, with view of ascertaining his physicial and mental condition at this time and at former tires, Michael Schenck Judge Presiding ~~ No. 13 State VSe John Rector ‘fo. 22 Btate V8e J. T. Whitaker MURDER. This case was called for trial and the defendant, Carrie Steele ’ asked to plead, whereupon the said defendant stated that she 4g not guilty of the crime of murder in the first degree or the Cine of murder in the second degree, but she is guilty of the crime of manslaughter and tenders a plea of guilty @ manslaughter which plea the Solicitor for the State accepts, : This defendant having entered.a plea of guilty of mans laughter and it having been accepted by the Solicitor for the State, the Court being of the ppinion that the fatal shot was wired under great provocation, it is ordered, upon recommendation of the Solicitor, that the defendant be imprisoned for a term of 12 month to be assigned to work at the Home for the Aged and Infirm of " Iredell County, as provided by statute. No. 15 State VSe Carrie Steele Noe 19 State lorth ‘ ine North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term 1927, Hon. Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, We, the Grand Jury for the May Term of Iredell County Superior Court 1927, beg leave to submit the following report: We have adted upon all bills sent before us by the Solicitor and have made due returns of seme to the Court. The County Jail was visited and there were found to be eleven white In all 6- eleven These and seven females and seven colored males and one female. h: nales 1e whi me Sé ite males, one white female, seven colored males, and one female colored. We found the jail and premises in prisoners report they are well fed and cared for, Sanitary condition, This Honorable Court takes a recess We visited the County Chain Gang and found seven white prisoners and fifteen colored yr isoners, in: al} There are also sixteen mules well cart? twenty-two, for and in good condition, We recommend that new bedding be purchased for thie ots and also cotton Pillows, and further recommend that the bedding be kept washed and cleaned up. We also recommend that Spurgeon Crisp be brought to jail for treatment at once, We visited the County Home for aged and infirm and found eighteen white fem vh ales, nine white males, seven cola ed females, and elefen colored males, forty-five. We found two whites blind and two colored blind, and three conv work on the farm, We found everything well kept and in good condition. W @ inspected the Court House and its several offices and find neatly kept by the latest methods in bookkeeping. We recommend the foll 1 all the interior both up and downstairs in the Court House be renovated bj Respectfully submitted, R. C. Little roreman of Granc vs : Charles Hedrick 9:30 o'clock, A. M, | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Tuesday, May 24, 1927, IMPERSONATING GO FICER. The defendent comes into open Court and through his counsel, waives Bill of Indictment and pleads guilty fo Forcible Trespass, which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judg- ment be continued for twelve months. CRIME AGAINST NATURE. The Defendant comes into open Court and through his coun- sel Lewis & Lewis pleads not guilty as charged in the Bill of Indictment. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled for the verdict return a verdict of guilty as charged in the Bill. until Wednesday morning, May 25, 1927, at c udge Presi@ing and Ho 15th Judicial District of North Carolina. ourts ior ' b ae ) SUPERIOR COURT : a Lo ay of te etna lone | r IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 264 Wednesday, May 25, 1928 a ‘ MAY TERY 1927 ¥ Wednesday, May 25, 19°27, This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment Wednesday morning | May 25, 1927, at 9:50 A. M. for the dispatch of business, ay : a aed a | Mid. i State No. 5 TO APPEAR AND SiOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, —. State Continued under former order, John Rector VSe John Ritchie MURDER. The defendant pleads not guilty on the charge of murder in the first degree of the killing with premeditation and deliberation of Della Rector, but tenders a plea of guilty of murder in the second degree, namely, the unlawful, wilful and feloniuus kill- ing with malice aforethought of Della Rector, which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State, Judgment of the Court is that the deféndant be imprisoned for a term of 50 years in the State Penitentiary at’ hard labor. No ° 66 LARCENY. State Continued under former order, VS. Defendant allowed to give bond in sum of $100, Elmer Miller No. 320 { The executors of J. A, Davidson, deceased, are allowed and do J. Ae Davidson* )} hereby make themselves parties plaintiff, and they further adopt MURDER. VSe @ the complaint heretofore filed by the former plaintiff, now de- The defendant comes into open Court and through her counsel ¢. M. Gilleland § ceased, Grier & Grier, pleads not guilty. ' The Solicitor for the State announces in open Court that he will not ask for a verdict of murder in the first degree, but states that he will ask for a verdict of murder in the senénd degree or inanslaughter as the evidence may justify. At the clase of the State's evidence, the Court directed a B. L. Scronce, W. D. Turner, Vinton Liddell verdict of not guilty. Pickens and R. S. Pickens, on behalf of them- The defendant through her counsel waives bill of carrying cone selves and allother stockholders and creditors cealed and pleads guilty. who may come in and make themselves parties ZEXLRXGNASRARLAALAAKINARRAXRTX ARR x COAAKXLAL KAKA LEMAR penentare ae ee a ee AXLLRKXORAPRQEVAxAMAXKRAXRASKAXENKIMAEMAXEREKXLRAAR. Vs No. .14 State VSe Jane Gibson In the Suverior Court, \ Carolina North U@ ’ May Term. Iredeli County. RECEIVER'S REPORT { ' 4 f j { i { ! HOUSEBREAKING AND LARCENY. Link*Pitkens Publishing Company, a Corporation _The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel, Lewis & Lewis, pleads not guilty as charged in the Bill of In dictment. Jury No. 1, after being sworn and empanélled for the ‘ verdict, return a verdict of guilty as charged in the bill, eet Sale ree atom SETS OF SLOSK, COligOtion OF t is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be gvesk subsorieeAgns..and upon open accounts = tere : ~ + 3 Q ve 5f—£ Amount paid out to date as of preferred claims and expenses aivead of Receivership wonn eS IB eS 1,665.15 Noe 17 State VSe Brode Torrence $7,035.26 Se ee et HO pee Be , B.alance now on hand and deposited to the credit of State. | Gontinuea res Mere Robert A. Collier, Receiver, in the Peoples Loan & State Continued for Defendan Savings Bank, Statesville, N. C. VSe ; Bd Miller This the 23rd day of May, 1927. ; Robert A. Collier \ Receiver > No. 19 State vs Charles Hedrick CKIME AGAINST NATURE. The verdict of the jury heretofore retu a The : rned finding this apeendent guilty of the felony as charged in the bill of ine, cr omeene is, in the discretion of the Court, set aside. The caitae ar eee ma counsel Mr. Lewis, tenders a plea of fultt oy an attempt to committ the felon “charged in the aoat of indictrent, to-wit; a misdemeanor whieh pies is ace Approved and ordered filed, this the 25rd day of May, 1927. co the Solicitor Sor the State, and the judgment of the s that the defendant be imprisoned for a term of not less than eight nor more tha I prone | 0 n n TEN MONTHS, to be worked upon the? ' enck the roads of Iredell County, not to wear stripes. es udge Pres ee ser ie ng Courts for 15th Judicial District of North Carolina, ee et ee ee a No. 14 CARRYING CONCRALED VEAPON, partes Lt le ordered and Jane Gibson \ \ \ \ \ May 25, 1927, \ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Wednesday,,May 25, 1929 This Honorable Court conwenes according to adjournment Wednesday morning, at 9:50 A. M. for the dispatch of business, AND Si OVW GOOD BEHAVIOR, PPEAR No . 5 TO 3 N\State Continued under former order, VBe John Ritchie No. 66 State Ve Elmer No. 14 State Vie Jane G Oe: 17 State VSe 3rode No. 18 State VBe Ba M 1 d No, 19 State vs Charles No. 14 State Va. Jane Gibson LARCENY. Continued under former order, Defendant allowed to give bord in sum of $100, Miller MURDER. The defendant Grier & Grier, The Solicitor will not ask for comes into open Court and through her counsel pleads not guilty. : for the State announces in open Court that he verdict of murder in the first degree, but states that he will for a verdict of murder in the sesend degree or manslaughter as the evidence may justify. At the clase of the State's evidence, the Court directed a verdict of not euilty. The defendant through her counsel waives bill of carrying 00ne cealed and pleads tullty. EEXLAXGMABRAAXRRAXAR SHAR AAX RK RRR x ROR Me x RRR Rx Hee R x Shoe Keck occa AXLERRXARXPRA EAR KaMAXKnexKarkaxkngkmaknnx te kk RAKR » ibson ask See ee ee Be eee Se D LAX CENY. comes into open Court and through his counsel, pleads not guilty as charged in the Bill of Ine Noe 1, after betng sworn and empanélied for the verdict of guLlty as charged in the bill, and adjudged by the Court that the defendant te _ +rtT-t at of HOUSEBREAKING The defendant Lewis * Lewis, dictment. Jury verdict, return Torrence Ler IVE AGAINST ry NATURE, beraetans cntiee ae Jury heretofore returned finding this dictment io eee " the felony as charged in the bill of ine tt it fa in the discretion of the Court, set aside. The t defendant, throurh his counsel Mr. fit wet an attempt to committ the felony’ charged in the cepted by tha anti eneae a misdemeanor which plea is ace Bacio ieee eo leitor Bor the State, and the judgment of the Sake: tine eh defendant be imprisoned for a term of not Oo Pont, (keht nor more than TEN MONTHS, the roads of Iredell} County, not to wear stripes. Hed > tek Se eee ce it “eon CONCKALED VBAPON t ia ordared and adfud ; Judged by the be imprisoned in the common jail of orn of NINETY pays with permisaion ‘Oo work at the Home of the Aged Court that the defendant — Iredell County for a of the County Commiss and Infirm for said period Lowis, tenders a plea of Gu to be worked upon the * No. 13 State VBe John Rector No. Je. Ae VSe CG. M. a Carolina, Tredell County. B. Le Scronce, W. D. Turner, Vinton Liddell Pickens and R,. selves and allother stockholders and creditors who may come in and make themselves parties plaintiff in this action, LinkePitkens Publishing Company, a Corporation Amount stock subscriptions and upon open accounts Amount paid out to date as of of Re 320 ! IN THE SUPERIOR couRT MAY TERM 1927 Wednesday, May 25, 1927, oe he defendant plesds not eullty on the charge of mur n th first degree of the killing viet premeditation and aa ittwenh ten of Della Rector, but tenders a plea of guilty of murder in the second degreo, namely, the unlawful, wilful and felonious kille ing with malice aforethought of Della Rector, which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State, Judgment of the Court is that the deféndant be imprisoned for a term of 50 years in the State Penitentiary at’ hard labor, The exccutors of J. A, Davidson, deceased, are allowed and do hereby make themselves parties plaintiff, and they further adopt the complaint heretofore filed by the former plaintiff, now de- Davidson~°) ceased, Gilleland In the Superior Court, May Term, 8S. Pickens, on behalf of them- RECEIVER'S KEPORT Va. <i e e received to date from sale of stock, collection of $7,035.26 preferred claims and expenses anys celvership 6 572-11 1,663.15 credit of Balance now on hand and deposited to the Loan & Robert A. Collier, Receiver, in the Peoples Savings Bank, Statesville, N. C. This the 23rd day of May, 1927, Robert A. Collier ‘Recelver Approved and ordered filed, this the 24rd day of May, 1927. flat Schenck udge Fres ne and Holding Vourts for idth Judicial District of North Carolina, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT M@Y TERM, 1927 SECOND WEEK, Monday May 30, 1927, In the Superior Court, Second week May Term, 1927, North Carolina, 4 Iredell County. {| fhis Honorable Court meets according to adjourmment at 9:30 o'clock, A. M. Monday morming Nay, 50, 1927 when and where Hig Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding and Holdimg Courts of the 15th Judicial District of North Car. Olina, i@ present and presiding, this the Second week for Civil Cases at May Term, 1927, M. P. Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolima, re. turned into open Court the names of the following good and law@ul men to serve as Jjnnorssof this Court for the second week for civil cases, to-wit: Herman Hoover, A. N. Hellard, C. H. Leaber, J. W. Newton, J. M. Wagner, P. g, Shinn, A. W. Johnson, J. C. Howard, '’. T. Summers, H. L. Gilbert, G. w, Baity, Boise Hunter, R. D, Goodin, Chas J, Stevens, J. H, McLelland, K. H, Stevendon, Jeff A. Lackey, J. W. mvs, J, 3; Halyburton, R. M. Abernathy, and T A Coley, _ The following were excused for lawful causes: Jf Pp, Hudson and F. A. Sherrill, The following was returned as, Not to be found gn Iredell County; Will Q. Estes, No. 358 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, May Term, 1927, Mrs. Robbie Harris, Plaintiff vs. Dudley Harris, Defendant 1. Were the Plaintiff ana defendant intermarried as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, 2. D ; id the defendant, Dudley Harris, commit adultery with one, Nola Rankin, as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, Seca as the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North C arolina for two vears next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Monday, May 30, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1927, Mrs. Robbie Harris V8. JUDGMENT Dud ley Harris This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Judge Pre- siding, and a jury, at the May Term 1927, of the Iredell County Superior Court, and being heard, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows: "1, Were the plaintiff and defendant intermarried, as alleged in tk complaint? Answer, Yes, 2. Did the defendant, Dudley Harris, commit adultery with one, Nola Rankin, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for two vears next preceding the commencement of this action, Answer, Yes," It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimoneyv heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Mrs. Robbie Harris, and the defendant, Dudley Harris, be, and the same are hereby dissolved and the Plaintiff granted a divorce absolute from the defendant, Dudley Harris, It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this actia M 50th, 1927. a ’ Michael Schenck Judge Ppresial ng No. 366, North Carolina, In the Snverior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1927. Rachel Harris McClelland by her next friend, 6 Jno. T. Gillespie i t j VS, Issues s&s James McClelland Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of lst. North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, ; 2nd, Did the plaintiff anu defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? / Answer: Yes, ch dale ; 3rd. Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the aeneee te < Oe Oe de Amewer: Yes, a eeceg aan IN THE SUPERIOR COURT "q | - IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 68 MAY TKRM 1927 MAY TERM 1927 2 Monday, May 30, 1927, Monday, May 30, 1927, North Carolfina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1927, Rachel Harris McClelland by her next friend, Jno. T. Gillespie v8. . ¢ x be Whereas May 30th is the date annually apart as a memorial day to World War and others. James McClelland observed for the dead soldiers of the This cane coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court, Shes court taka a wesuan S08 SL Therefore, it is ordered that and being heard before His Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding and a jury, P. M. in Honor of the memory of those soldiers of this nation who gave their 2350 o Me + . E r ~ +) and the jury having answered the issues submitted to then as follows: es ee cine ware oF our Cx lives in lst. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two vears prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, end. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 5rd. Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, kt ia, therefore, adjudged, ordered and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Rachel Harris Me- Clelland, and the defendant, James McClelland, be, and the same are hereby dis- solved and an absolute divorce is granted, It is further ordered by the court that the plaintiff be taxed with the cost of this action by the Clerk of this Court. Michael Schenck Judge Presiding 15th Judicial District No, 359 North Carolina, ae Sadak. In the Superiér Court, Emuel Corry Plaintiff V8. Anna May Corry Defendant 1. Has the plaintirr been a resident of the state of North Coro for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action, as alleged in > the complaint? oe Answer: Yes, 2. Were the plaintirr and defendant married as alleged in the compl Answér: Yes, ; 5. Did the defendant, Anna May Corry, commit adultry as alleged i complaint? Answer: Yes, 270 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Monday, May 30, 1927 No, 5651 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell Vounty. Before the Clerk, RK. P. Nicholson, intiff and defendant intermarried one with asalleped ANSWER $ Second: 4d %} defendent abandon the plaintiff without just oc: llered part of thisaction? Carolina a8 alleged In the Superior Court, May Term, 1927, Term of Superior Court of nor Michael Schenck, Judge the issues submitted to them with another as st cause on his part Thirds Have the eee ie ie : ¢ 1e na , uri the nl intirfr lived separa a) and apart for more five successive nas : er 1oxt preceeding the commencement of this action? Ansv ers Yes, Fourth: as the plat; it our Has the plaintiff been , resicent of the state of North Carolina for more than five years next preceeding the commencement of this action as ellemee in the complaint? | : Answer: Yes, It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaints IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Monday, May 30, 1927, R, P. Nicholson, be and he is hereby granted a divorce absolute from the defendant, Emily Miller Nicholson, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing be- tween the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved, Michael Schenck Judge Presaltding No, 286 North Carolina, In the Supertor Court. Iredell County. A. Le Watts, Plaintiff VSe Ww. L. Hand Medicine Vompany, W. H. Belk, V. J. Guthery, W. H. Willard, W. L. Jenkins, A. J. Draper, Geo. W. Graham, Jr. E. P. Gatling, J. L. Spencer, W. L. Hand, J. L. Hawley, E. Morrison, Sr. Defendants In the above entitled action plaintiff in ope court shrough his counsel, takes a voluntary non-suit as to the defendant, E, Morrison, It is, therefore, considered and ad: ‘ed by the Court that as to the dee fendant, Be Morrison, Sr. , pl: intiff's cause of ) be and the same is her by non-suited, No, 28! North Carolina, In the Supertor Court, Iredeil County. J. GV. Shelton, Plaintiff V3.6 We L. Hand Medicine Company, W. He Belk, V. J. Guthery, W. H. Willard, ) We L. Jenkins, A. J. Draper, Geo. We Graham, Jr., E. P. Gatling, J. L. Spencer, We. Le. Nand, J. Le Hawley, E. Morrison, Sre Dofendants § In the above entitled action plaintiff in open court, throug his counsel, takes a voluntary non-suit as to the defendant E. MOrrieon,:8r. It 1s, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that as to the de» fendant, E. Morrison, Sr., plaintiff's cause of action be and the same is hereby non=su i ted ° Michael Schenck Judge Presiding No. 287 North Carolina : In the Superior Court. Tredel) County. W. D, Turner, Plaintiff VBe We L. Hand Medicine Cempatty : W. He 4 WL. enkins, A. J. Draper, Geo. W. Graham, Jr, + fk. P, Gatling, i L. encer, W. L. Hand, J. L. Hawley, ( Q I { k, V. J. Quthery, W. H. Willard, | + Morrison, Sr., Deferdantes 972 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MKY TERM 1927 Monday, May 30, 1927, In the above entitled action plaintiff in open Court, through thi 8 Couns takes a voluntary non-suit as to the defendant, E. Morrison, Sr - It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that as t¢ t © the defendant, E. Morrison, Sr., plaintiff's cause of action be and the Same is h 4©@ 1s ereby non-suited, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding No. 287 Na: th Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court, We D. Turner, Plaintiff VSe Hand ,Medic ine Company, W. H. Belk, 7 han< iW wepis ’ ee Guthery, W. He. Williard, w. L. Henkins raper, Geo. W. Graham, E. P. Gatli , ak Snencer. W. L. Haat Ss se a ‘ »pencer, W. 4, Hand, J. L. Hawlev 4 Morrison and J. H. Van Ness. Jr fi an Ness, ° Defendants ) This cause ming be } J r coming on to be heard before his Honér, Michael Scherek Judge , tre o ad 3 « - f r C ry “Siding a one Ma Ye?’ term this Cour E z this Court, and it appearing to the Court that this action was i i } g nwas instituted arsainst the defe uted against the defendant, mi. es Hand Medicine Compeny, and ars i ae t G e individu 21 £2411 US MA tl x +}C ne GQ of 2ndé nts a L e¢ to 3 Hand on p ny the vv rs Ot Sé id C Meddéine Cc 3 r Plaintiff allegin in substa } } Ging, in substance, that he purchased certain stock in the said W. L Hand Medicine npany. paving ++ a a i Company, paying therefor partly by cash and partly by the execution and C ea] ivery of Ce a i ery rf certain notes and alleging ++ © 42MaQ als cing I” - ’ eging further that the salesmen who negotiates the sale of ssid ode , # said stock to the plaintiff made false representations to the plaintiff in the sale thereof; an gi Vv ale lere and alleging further t) ; +he further that the individual defendants, as directors of © d ve Le AQ 210 we Cc in , Or 4 Were Ful y oO d 2 Fer Cc Pp saj \ He na qaic 1e npanv ere oi% ] r e 4 n e in the a rt Lculars set Ps y 3 ~ é t r 7 rl , ou i n } 1 3 Cc om k bd 8 Nn : E j j t the mplaint and it an rearing that t 1 4 ’ ppeariy ) hat he pia int Li, by this action, is seeking rec LSilon and ca Cc é L 4 f t e rs se f S& id t I £ to 900 shar € Sy ALI ells G: on Oo rr1é pu las Oo é ‘ ock > ) o , &@ nountin the return to ] im V nt 38 f © O - L] 2 . I , 1im of two 4100E8S O Pp 00K ) O each and the pa yment té6 him oO $ 50 00 e ’ 4 ’ 4 n at the pure iase Oo S j iter est thereor : ! Lcd 2 : Saic stock, with ir NOVE nber iith, 1924 . unt he a Pé id Ver ’ ad , being the cash paid by hin less the dividend of $169.75, And it further appea r appearing to the Court that the attorneys far the plaintiff, and the attorneys for t} J m ney phe endar W defendant W. L. Hang Medicine Company, and for W. H» Belly * os Guthery, W H Willi ra ( ¢ e Le a lie awley, V y « + ‘ a j Ge ir f 5° W Ure © ’ We rahan, Jr., es eak Spencer, oa ' . I . Van Nes Jr. h ve : and d ’ ’ a reached an agreement whereby the Plaintiff agrees bo} pay the notes, execut a by him y ’ ed by him as a Part of the Purchase price of said stock , and ; SO purchased by him, and, in consideration thereof, + Hand Medicine Company agrees to $4416.66, provided such Surrender the said Bhares of stock the defendant, w. pay tothe plaintiff the sum 0 an ag , Ercement and Compromise has the approval of the ¢ For the Purpose of considering and Bassing upon said the Court has heard testimony in reference t See o , oO th Plaint and answer on fiie herein © allegations set forth in the ’ reof, the Court is of the | tending to show any liability on the part | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT | MAY TERM 1927 243 Monday, May 30, 1927 individual directors on account of the transactions set forth in the complaint, and has no evidence tending to support the allegations of the complaint against aha individual defendants, In so far as the plaintiff's clain against the W. L. Hand Medicine Company is concerned, the Court, after a thprough consideration of the facts, finds that it is to the best interest of said corporate defendant to make bhe settlement hereinbefore reférred to, and said settlement is, therefore, approved, and the said copporation is hereby authorized and empowered to perfect the said settlement. WHEREFORE, it is hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff surrender up to the defendant W. L. Hand Medicine Company the shares of stock re- ferred to in the complaint, and pay the notes given as a part of the purchase price of said stock, and it is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant W. L. Hand Medicine Company, the sum of $4416.66 in full settle- ment of any and all cause, or causes, of action or claims of any kind and character whatsoever which the plaintiff now has, or may hereafterhave against any one by reason of the facts or circumstances alleged in the complaint, and especially by reason of the purchase of the stock therein referred to. It is further ordered that this judgment is a full and complete settlement of all matters between the parties hereto, as to any allegations in the pleading and is a bar and an estoppel as to any future action relative thereto, except as to defendant, E. Morrison, Sr., and as to him a judgment of non-suit has hereto- fore been taken by the plaintiff. The plaintiff hereby acknowledges the receipt of $4416.66 from the W. L. Hand Medicine Company in full settlement of this judgment against the W. L. Hand Medicine Company and the W. L. Hand Medicine Company hereby acknowledges the surrender of the stock and payment of thenotes by the plaintiff in full settlement of the judgment against the plaintiff. The defendant, W. L. Hand Medicine Company shall pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 30th day of May, 1927. Michael Schenck \ Judge Presiding \ No. 313 North Carotina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1927. Robert A. Collier, Receiver, ink-Péckens Publishing Co. ¥8; Judgment oe os Sy ee oe te C. BL, Parker IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Monday , May 30, 1927 This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court bee. fore the undersigned Judge and the jury, and the parties having come into Court through their attorneys and admitted that al) matter and things in controversy have been settled by defendant agreeing to pay the plaintiff $100.00 ana the costs of this action, and that said amount has been paid in full. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the action be demurred upon judgment as of non-suit and that defendant pay the costs, Michaél Schenck Judge Presiding Noe 51] North Carolina, In the Superior Court, County. May Term 1927, Me Collier, Receiver of the ckens Publishing Company JUDGMENT ause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1927 of Iredell Superior > undersigned, Judge presiding, and a jury, and the jury having issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff and against the dee idebted to the plaintiff and if so, in which amount? $100.00,"with interest" reforc, ordered and ad tudced that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $100.00, wit} interest th reon, and the costs of this actions ed by the Clerk of this Courte Michael Sbhenck Judge Presiding n Ae Scott, Atty. for Lewis & Lewis, Attys No. 310 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term 1927. Robert A. Collier, Keceiver of the Link-Pickéns Publishing Company Sih JUDGMENT C. L. Gilbert ee ce SU ce oe This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1927, of Iredell oa Court, before the undersigned, Jude © presiding, and a jury, and the jury paving: es submitted to it in favor of the Plaintiff and against th : answered the issu ant as follows: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 275. MAY TERM 1927 Monday, May 36, 1927, "1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff and if so, in what amount? Answer. Yes. $75.00" It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of t he defendant the sum of $75.00 and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Cour. Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding May 30th, 1297 By Consent: Lewis ,« Lewis, Attys. for Defendant John A. Scott, Atty. for Plaintiff arolina, in the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1927, Robert A. Collier, Receiver LinksPickens Publishing Co. VSe Ross V. Alley. This cause coming on to be heard a his er m of the Cburt before the undersigned Judge Presiding, and 2 srr 3 5 © order: ‘ ) $ 4 2d na y consent of the plaint f and defend nt, it is ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of G100.00 and the costs of this acfion to be taxed by the Clerk of Michael Schenck, Judge Presidi By Consents: John A. Scott, Attorney for Plaintiff Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys for Defendant No. 374 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredel} County. May Term, 1927. W. D. Turner and Others, VSe Link-Pickens Publishing Co. It occuring to the Court that John A. Scott and Grier and Grier, am attorney for the Plaintiff, instituted ten suits for the Link-Pickens Publishing Company Prior to the time it went into the hands of a Receiver for the purpose of forcing Collection of stock subscriptions and that said suits were presecuted before George. R. Anderson, Justice of the Peace. to judgment in favor of the plaintiff and ths ‘ Seven of said cases were appealed from the Magistrate's Court to the superior IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 276 MAY TERM 1927 Monday , May 30, 1927 of Iredell County where they were affirmed by the judgment of the Superior pe. And that the amount involved in said suits was approximately $1000.00 It is ordered that the said attorneys be, and they are hereby allowed t @ sum of $150.00 for theif services as attorney in the Magistrate's Court and “ the Superior Court and the Receiver is authorized and empowered to pay the same IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 277 MAY TERM 1927 Tuesday. May 31 1927 4s Honorable Court convehés atco 4927, £0F the dispatch of business. LV <0 i. Carolina, rding to adjournment Tuesday Morning, May $1, In the Superior Court, fredell County e May Term, 1927. State VSe of the receivership. John Rector Michael Schenck, In the investigation of th e above entitled eause it appears to the Court ee that it was absolutely necessary and just that the ssic defendant, John Rector, ghould be examined by Physicians and egperts touching and concering the mental ae 9 condition of the defendant, and it further appearing that - court was entitled = Satake It is ordered to and desirous of the information furnished to the Court by said examination of vs f and a nwe tri ! by the Court that in this case the J ; ury be ~ pf al orderede : “en said Physicians, and it appearing that Dr. Ross McElwee, County Health Officer Dr. John M. McCampbell, Supt. of the and Physician of Tredell County, N and } j rs n Te f ade ¢ >xamir fon of said State Hospital for the Insane at Morganton, Ne Ve, made an € inat ief aha mn id fs ¥ 4 4 L eVAC ice nG ini orm 4 n o€ 201 Tt eY it a a th at & 4 f i Cia 3 € f . t o ) t € Cer; Court in investigation and determinin aid mat Now therefore it 4s ordeized anda adiudged by the Court that Dr. Ross Mec- iN WW c , o / AG 3 ALICL a . 0 Tear are e his yaminat n a na for nh is aid the sum of $10.00, Ten Dollars for his examinatio } se: and that Dr nn M. McCampbell be paid the s in sat ise ( ; yhn M. services as a witnes in said cas na for his witness fees of $25.00, TWENTY FIVE DDLLAKS, expenses in attending Court ir Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding 364 1 th iperio ftourt North Carolina, In the Superior © > Before the Clerk. Iredell County] petore, 570. Xm Elizabeth Hoke VSe Charlie Hoke 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the This Honorable Court 1LS NO! re S urt akes 3 ee onal a 7 “ re C ces a recess until Tuesday,morning, May Sl, 1627, omplaint? Answer: Yese EAi@ae 02B.a.c 2 Has the plaintiff been 4 resident of the State of North Carolina more ~ tion as alleged in the come Judge SSSI? olding than two years prior to the commencement of this ac Sth Judicial District ct Sorth carols at 9:30 o'clock plaint? Answer: Yese 3, Did the defendant commit adultery a8 alleged in the complaint? Answer: YeSe 2/8 North Carolina, Tredell IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 1927 Tuesday, May 351, 1927. In the Superior Coupe. ite County. Before the Clerk, Elizabeth Hoke VS. Charlie orn r monor, the issu complain > than nt? lat AA LLd Hoke THIS CAUSE, coming on to be heard at this ter m of the Court before Hig ichael Schenck, Judge Jury, and the jury having answereq es as follows: "1, Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged i a 7 I J ege n the Answers Ye@Se 2 Has the p Le peetasere been a resident of the State of North Carolina years r to the commencement of this action as alleged in th it adultery as alleged in the complaint? and adjusged that the bonds of intiff and the defendant be, and the same hereby granted an absolute divorce, 1 adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be Adam Lee Hoke, the minor child of the parties DECREED by the Court that the plaintiff recover on as taxed by the Clerk. Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding. Thi Jonorab i — Ss Honorable Court takes recess until Wednesday Morning, Juye 1, 1927, at 9:30 o'clock A. M. - (Quacl beck udge Presiding and Holding courts *0F 15th Judicial District of North Carolina. \ tredell County. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Wednesday, June 1, 1927, This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment, Wednesday morning» June 1, 1927, for the dispatch of business, No. 327 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term 1927. Jas. H. Cloaninger VSe JUDGMENT Espy J. Collins, Admr. Tis cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Judge Michael Schen Schenck and beind hard on 4 motion of Z. V. Turlington, Esqr. for permission to make the bondsamean of the defendant parties defendant and to amend the com- plaint, and ex parte settlement havingzbeen filed by the Admr., Espy J. Collis pefore the complaint was filed, to make the complaint accord with the present conditions. The amendment to be filed within 20 davs and the defendant to have 20 davs to answer the amended complaint. Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding. No. 269 North Carolina, upverior Court, 1927 Clarence Mavhew VS. JUDGMENT R. M. Washam This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Judge Michael Schenck and being heard and it apvearing that the parties to the controver~ sy have settled their differences by the defendant paying the plaintiff the sum of $50.00 and the plaintiff to pay the actual court cost since the case was docketed in the Superior Court and the witnesses actually summoned by the plaintiff and that the defendant to pay all cost prior to and the docketing of the case in the Superior Court and such witnesses as were summoned by the defendant ana the cost for issueing and serving the same. The cost to ve take ed accordingly by the Clerk of the Court. Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding. %, V. Turlington, Attorney for Plaintiff George A, Morrow, Atty. for Defendant. IRO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT? MAY TERM 1927 Wednesday, June 1, 1927, No, 368 North Carolina, in the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term 1927, J. F, Janes Plaintiff vs. TSB BUS 8 Pansy Ferguson Jaries Defendant First: Has the plaintiff been a resident and citizen of North Caroling for two consecutive vears next prior to the beginning of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, Second: Were the plaintiffand defendant married as alleged in the cone Answer: Yes, Third: Did the defendant, Pansy Ferguson James commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes North Caro} arolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1927 * > e rT J. F, James JUDGYENT 0 6 VS. | ) j Pansy Ferguson James This cause coming on to be heard and beingheard at this term of Court, before His Honor, Hon, Michael] Schenck, Judge Presiding and a Jury and the Jury having answered the issues submitted them as follows: First: Has the Plaintiff been a resident end citizennof North Carolina for two consecutive vears next prior to the beginning of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, Second: Were the Plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the com- Answer;* Yes, Thi : : "6 Did the defendant, Pansy Ferguson James commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, I t is thefefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bond of matrimony h eneretore @Xieving between the plaintire J. F. James, and the defendant, Pansy F $ erg son James be and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant I t is further orderag by the Court that the plaintiff pay the cost action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court Michael Schenck, Judge Presi dig IN THE SUPERIOR COURT? MAY TERM 1927, Wednesday, June 1, 1927. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term 1927, . Mills G. F Plaintiff v8. Mooresville Cotton Mills, Inc., Defendant 1. Was an injury to the plaintiff, G. F. Mills, caused by the negli- pence of the defendant, Mooresville Cotton Millas,as alleged in the complaint? Answer: - No, 2. If so, did the plaintiff, G. F. Mills, by his own negligence, contribute to said injury, as alleged in the answer? Answer: 5S. Did the plaintiff, G. F, Mills, assume the risk of being injured in the manner and way in which he was injured as alleged in the answer? Answer: 4. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff, G. F, Mills, entitled to recover of the defendant, Mooresville Cotton Mills ? Answer: No, 342 In the Suverior Court, — Carolina, Iredell County. May Term, 1927, R, S, Wilhelm ah ORDER ALLO'ING THK DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN r AMENDED ANSWER C. R. Readling and Heron Readling For cause shown, it is ordered and ad judged in the discretion of the Court, that the defendants be, and they are hereby allowed permission to file an amended answer in this action within fifteen days from and after the adjounn- ment of this term of Court. The Plaintiff is allowed thirty days thereafte~ to file amenéed comp? Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Wednesday, June l, 1927, No. 361 . North Carolina, In the Supertor Court s Iredell County. May Term, 1927 R, A, Haynie, Administrator ve, Tas Us C. B. Haynie 1, Is the defendant indebted to the Plaintiff, and if 80, in what amount? Answer: Yes, $650.00 with interest from July 6, 1925, N mn C orth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. Mav Term, 1927 e - @ 7h . Haynie, Administrator H. Haynie VS. JUDGMENT Haynie \ This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before the understm Presicing and the Jurv and the jury havi ng answered the issue subm‘tted to it favor of the plaintiff and ageinst the defendant as follows, to-wit; "1. Is the defendant trdebted to the plaintiff and if so, in what amount? Answer: Yes, $650.00 with interest from July 6, 1987," It is therefore ordered and adjindged that the plaintirr reoover of the defendant the sum of Six Hundred anda Fifty Dollars ($350.00) with interest on said amount at six ver cent from July 6, 1925 until paid. It is further ordered and adjudged that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, June i 927 f » 1927, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding. Nos. 370, 571, 372 and 373 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Tredell County. May Term, 1927 a. x Foust, — JUDGMENT Raymond Matden This caus } “use coming on to be heard, and being heard before Michael Schenck, Judge Pr & esiding, at the May Term, 1927, Superior Court of Iredell County, said cause ‘ auses of action being consolidated for Judgment, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant desires to withdraw his appeals; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That the appeals heretofore ente ntered in these causes by the defendant be, and the same are hereby with 6 rawny and nad it $# further ordered ana adjudged that the Judgments heretofore entered by the M e Magistrate who originally tried the actiong be, and the same are hereby cone fi ied, a 5 _ and the plaintiff is rendered judgment against the defendant according said judgments, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Re MAY TERM 1927 283 Wednesday, June 1, 1927, It is further ordered that the defendant pav the cost of this actions to be taxed by the Clerk of th‘s Court. Michael Schenck, Jydge Presiding. No. 3547 North Carolina, th the Suséiven Gaide, Iredell County. B, B. Brinkley VS. 4 { y JUDGMENT 4 i Walter Mayhew This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court, before His Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and a jury and after the jury was im- panflled and the evidence intorduced, plaintiff and defendant in open Court announced that thev had settled all matters in disnute between them on the following terms: 1. Defendant Valter Mavhew is to cancel all his cha&ims and demands age ainst the plaintiff, E,. B. Brinkley and wife; 2. Is to immediatelv celiver to the plaintiff Brinkley all the property described in the schedule attached to the officer's return in the claim and delivery proceeding in this action; 3. Defendant Walter Mayhew is to immediately procure and celiver at his residence to the plaintiff, E, B, Brinkley, all of the property heretofore sold bv him, as well as any other property he has of the plaintiff Brinktey; and 4. The plaintiff, E. B. Brinkley and wife, are to execute and deliver to the defendant, Walter Mayhew, a chattel mortgage, due twelve (12) months from date hereof, on all of the above described property, except the children's toys and play things, for the purpose of securing the said Walter Mayhew to the ex- tent of $100.00 and interest from February 2ne, 1926, untid paid, by reason of tb said Walter Mavhew having endorsed a note and other indebtedness of the plaintiff E, B, Brinkley. Now, Therefore, it is considered and adjudged by the Cowt that the above compromise be and the same is hereby in all respects approved and confirmed, and the parties hereto are ordéred and adjudged to execute and carry out the same as the jugment and orders of this Court. It is further considered and adjudged that each party pay his own cost of action, This the lst day of June, 1927. Mychael Schenck, Jndge presiding and holding the Supertr Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial By Consent: District of North Carolina. 284: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT L MAY TERM, 1927 Yednesday, June 1, 1927, No. 285 North Carotina : In the Sum rior Court, Iredell County. J. G, Shelton, Plaintiff vs. JUDGYENT 7’, L, Hand Medicine Co., W. H, Belk, V. J. Guthery, ¥. He. Willard, W. L, Jenkins, A, J. Draper, Geo. W, Grahan, Jr., E, P, Gatling, J. L. Spencer, w, L, Hand, J, L. Hawley, and #, Morrison, Sr,, Defendants SO et et es Ene This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding at the Mary, 1927 Term of this Court, and it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted against the defendant W, L. Hand Medicine Company, and against the individualy defendants as directors of said Hand Medicine Company, the plaintiff,alleging, in substance, that he purchased certain stock in the said W, L. Hand Medicine Company, paying therefor by the execution and delivery of certain notes, and alleging further that the salemennwho negotiated the sales of said stock to the plaintiff made false representattobns to the Dlaintiff in the sale thereof; and alleging further that the individual defend- ants, as directors of said W, L. Hand Medicine Company, were guilty of negligence in the partimlars set out in the’ complaint: and it appearing that the plaintiff, bv this action, is seeking a recision of saia stock amounted to 600 shares, and the return to him of the notes referred to in the complaint, And it further appearing to the Court that the attornevs for the plaintiff and the attorneys for the def-ndeant W. L. Hand Medfcine Company, and ™, H, Relk, Ve Oe Guthery, 7. H, Villard, George ‘7, Graham, dx., J. Leak Spencer, J. L,. Hawley, and J, He Van Ness, Jr., have reached an agreement whereby the plaintiff agrees to pay the notes, executed by him for the purchase of said stock, and to surrender the said shares of stock so purchased by him, and, in consideration thereof, the defendant, W., L. Hana Medicine Company, agrres to Pay to the plaintiff the sum of $2791.66 Provided such an agreement and compromise has the approval of the Court. For the purpose of cons idertrig and passing upon said proposed settlement, the Court has heard testimony in reference to the allegations set forth in the complaint and answer on file herein, and in reference to the issues thus raised. After hearing such evidence, and upon a consideration thereof, the Court is of the opinion that the Plaintiff has no evidence tending to show any liability on the part of the individual directors On account of the transactions set forth in the complaint, and has no evidence tending to support the allegations of the complaint against said individual defendants, In so far as the plaintiff's claim against the WwW. L, Hand Medicine Company is concerned, the Court, after a thorough considera tion of the facts, finds that it is to the best interest of said corporate defe ht to, and said settlement is, there approved, and the said Corporation is hereby authorized and empowered to | perfect the said settlement, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MAY TERM, 1927, Wednesday, June 2,” 1927, WHEREFORE, it is hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff surrender up to the defendant W, L. Hand Medicine Company the shares of stock referred to in the complaint, and pay the notes executed for the pur- chase of said stock, and it is further ordered and adjui ged that the plaintiff récover of the defendant, W, L., Hand Medicine Company, the sum of $2791.66 in full settlement of any and allcéatse, or causes, of action or claims of any kind and character whatsoever whick the plaintiff now has, or may hereafter have against anyone by reason of the facts or circumstances alleged in the complaint and especially by reason of the purchase of the stock herein referred to. It is further ordered and adjudged that this judgment is a full and come plete settlement of all matters between the parties hereto, as to any allegatios in the pleading and is a bar and an estonvpel as to anv future action relatives thereto, exdept as to defendant E, Vorrison, Sr., and as to him aifudgment of non@suit has heretofore been taken bv the plaintff, The plaintiff hereby acknowledges the receipt of $2791.86 from the W. be Hand Medicine Company in full settlement of this judgment against the W. L. Hand Medicine Company and the W. L. Hand Medicine Company, hereby acknowledges the surrender of the stock and payment of the notes by the plaintiff im full settle- ment of the judgment against the plaintiff, The defendant, W. L. Hand Medicine Company shall pay the costs of this action to be taxed bv the Clerk. a he 30th dav of May, 1927. ee : z Michael Schenck, “od Judge Presiding, No. 286 3 North Carolina ; amen In the Superior Court, Iredell County. \. L. Watts, Plaintiff a JUDGNENT WY. L, Hand Medicine Co., W. H. Belk, V. J. Guthery, W. H, Willard, W. L, Jenkins, A. J. Draper, Geo. W. Graham, Jr., K. P. Gatlin, Je by Spencer, W, L. Hand,’ J. L. Hawley, E. Moprison, Sr. Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding at the May, 1927 term of this Court, and it appearing to the Court that this action was instituted against the defemdant W. L. Hand Medicine Compa and against the individual defendants as directors of said Hand Medicine Company the Plaintiffalleging, in substance, that he purchased certain stock in the said W, 1, Hand Medicine Company, paying therefor: by the execution and delivery of certain notes, and alleging further that the salesmen who negotiated the sale of said stock to the plaintiff made false representations to the plaintff in the sale th ‘reof; and alleging further that the individual defendants, as @irectors of said W, L, Hand Medicine Company, were guilty of negligence in the Particulars set out in the complaint; and it appearing that the plaintiff, yy this action, is seeking a recision of said stock ee to hares IRG6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM 1927 Wednesday, June L, 1927. the return 66 him of the ndées referred to in the coépplai nt, And it further appering to the Court that the attorneys for the Plaintipe vey and the attornevs for the defendsnt W. L. Hana Medicine Company, and for WeoHy Belk, V. J. Guthery, W. H. Willard, Geo. W. Graham, Jr., J. Leak Spencer, Feb Hawley, and J, H. Van Ness, Jr. have reached an agreement whereby the Plaintige agrres to pay the notes, executed by him for the purchase of said stock and to surrender the said shares of stock so purchased by him, and,iin consideration thereof, the defendant W, L. Hand Medicine Company agreed to pay to the Plaintife the sum of $5000, provided such an agreement and compromise has the approval of the Court, For the purpose of considering and passing upon said proposed Settlement, the Court has heard testimony in reference to the allegations set forth in the con- plaint and answer on file herein, and in reference to the issues thus raised,, After hearing such evidence, and upon a consideration, the Court is of the opinbon that the plaintiff has no evidence tending to show any liabilitwuen the part of the individual directors on account of the transactions set forth in the complaint, and has no evidence to support the allegations of the complaint against said ine dividual defendants, In so fa r as the Plaintiff's clai against the W. L, Hand iedicine Company, is concerned, the Court, after a thorough consideration of the facts, finds that it is to the best interest of said corporate defendant, to make the settlement hereinbefore referred to, and said settlement is, therefore, approved and the said cornoration is hereby authorized and empowered to perfect the said settlement, YHEREFORE, it is hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the plain- tiff surrender up to the defendant W. L. Hana Medicine Company the shares of stock referred to in the complaint, and pay the notes executed for the purchase of said Stock, and it is further ordered and ad judged that the plaintiff recover of the defendwmt W. L. Hand Medicine Company, the sum of $5000. in full settlement of any and all cause, or causes of action or claims of any kind and character whatsoever which the plaintirr now has, or may hereafter have against any one by reason of the facts or circumstances alleged in the complaint, anda especially by reason of the purchase of the stock therdin referred to It is further ordered that this judgment is a full andcomplete settlement of all matters between the parties hereto, an to any allegations in the pleading d € and is a bar and an estoppel &8 to any future action relative thereto, except a8 to a 5 » @ Oo defendant E, Mo rison, “re, and as to him & judgment of non-suit has hereto= fore been taken b* the plaintrr, > 4 e > The plaintirr hereby acknowledges the receipt of $5000.00 from the We la Hand Medicine Company in fui1 Settlnent of this judgment against the W. L. Hand’ M wW edicine Company and the W. L, Hand Medicine Company hereby acknowledges the \° surrender of the stock by the plaintiff in full settlement of the judgment against the plaintiff, The defe © defendant, W. Lt. Rena Medicine Company, shall pay the costs of th® action to be taxed by the Clerk, This the 30 day of May, 19°27 rn 8 ° nudge F te | Noe $65 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MAY TERM, 1927, yy, 60 5A Wednesday, June 1, 1927, North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1927. J. GC. Templeton vs. JUDGMENT Nick Dalton This cause coming on to be heard and being heard befé6ére His Honor, Michad Schenck, Judge Presiding at this Term of the Suverior Court of Iredell County, and it anpearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have compromised their difference by an agreement that the deféndant pay the plaintiff the sum of $105.00 and further that the defendant shallpav the cost of this action. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by th Court that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendant and his bondsmen, R. H., Kennedv and C. CG. Tharpe, the sum of $105.00 and the cost of this action to be taxed bv the Clerk. Michael Schenck, Jndge Presiding. By consent: Lewis & Lewis and C. H. Dearman, Attornevs for the Platntiff W, A. Bristol and Hugh G. Mitchell, Attornevs for the Defendant. No, 344 C th S > ic North Carolina, In the Superior Iredell County. May Term, 1927, Mary C, Summers s " ThAt ™ VS. JUDGMENT M. D, Tilley AG} a VV This cause coming on to beheard and being heard before His Honor, i D ai , , t 2 Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and it annearing to the Court that the plain tiff desired to take a non-suit: It is therefore ordered ane acjudged that this cause be, and the same is hereby non-suited and dismissed. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 288 MAY TERM 1927 Wednesday, June 1, 1927, No. 256 North Carolina, In the Superior Court ’ Iredell County. May Term, 1927 G. F. Mills { } V8. § JUDGMENT (§ § fooresvilte Cotton Mills, Ine, This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before Hig Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the Court having sub. mitted to the Surv and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the re. cord; It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plain. tiff take nothing by reason of his writ.and that the defendant go hereof without day and recover its cost incurred, It is further considered and adjudged that the plaintiff Day the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, o Ff, Milis THE FOLLOYVING JURY was drawn, sworn and empanelled i ag gg 95 verdict: Herman Hoover, A, N, Hellard, Jo i. Leeber, Jeff A, Lackey, J. M, Wagoner, T, A, fooresville 1 i, he nelyeaeee ets ae ke “hunt oh, Hak bon, - "e Baity and Boyce Hunter, 7; ee Mills ra 8. Mooresville Cotton Mills, Upon the con : oning tn of the verdict, the plaintiff moves to set aside the qa verdict and motion overruled, Plaintiff accepts Plaintiff moves for a new °. 4 et au su trial. Motion overruled, Plaintiff accepts. Judgt. To the Signing of the foregoing judgt,. the nlaintiffr obiects. Obiestion overrule 6 4 , 28 ana « led Plaintiff accepts ane sives notice of anveal to the Supreme Court in open Court. Apneal bond in the sum of $150. adjudged sufficient rlaintiff allowed 45 days to make up and serve case on appeal. Defendant . allowed 45 days after such service to make up and serve countercase or file exceptions, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ' MAY TERM, 1927, / Wednesday, June 1, 1927. oJ. Fe Horton va. We. A, Bristol, Trustee and Statesville Lumber Co, Continued by consent. Nettie Shoemaker vs, Otis Shoemaker, Continued, Carl H, Mathis vs. Cleo Mathis, Continued. Dallas A. Shafer Co, vs. G. &, M. Service Station, Continued. J. L. Shimpox, trading as Shimpox Bros, ve. J. P, Kennerly, Cont'd, Atlantie Paint Co. vs. Mooresville Furniture Co., Continued, Elkin Hdw. Co. vs. M. P. Cockey, Stearns Bros., Inc. et wl Continued under the courtesy of Mr. H. P, Grier. Roxie May Weber vs. Robert Weber, Continued, G. L. Crowell vs. Rov L. Coleman, Continued, G. L. Crowell vs. Glover Heritage, Continued. Joe Currin vs. Jte&s Stearns, Continued, “; be fox Ve. Lb. 0. Gibson, Continued, Bank of Stony Point vs. Db, D. Littlejohn, Margaret Brawley, Admrx, of R. V. Brawley, Continued, ‘No. J. GC, Brookshire vs. McQueen Foures and wife, Continued, Wo R. W, Zeigler vs, J, F. Combs, Lelia Combs and ", P, Carpenter, Cont. \No, ¢ Mrs. Beale Ost vs. Ellen Nilson, Continued, ‘No, Mattie Thomas, et al vs, Laural Park “states, Continued, \No. 2c ALS: Alexander, et al vs. Balance-Snllivan COu, Continued, NNo, W. D. Turner, et al vs. Link-Pickens Publishing Co., Continued, No. State of North Carolina, In the Superior Court, County of Iredell \ Hi-Hey Construction Company, Plaintiff \ VS. : S. N, Hughes and J. E, Grant, trading as ) Grant Contracting Company, Def endant ) Upon hearing the petition of W. T. Edwards, asking to be allowed to inte» vene in the above entitled action, and it appearing to my satisfaction that his petition should be granted, on Motion of Edward M, Land, Attorney for petitioner, IT IS ORDERED, That the said W. T. Edwards be, and is hereby permitted to file his petition intervening and to have the property delivered to him upon the execution of a bond to J. H. Krider, Sheriff of Rowan County, in the sum of $2250.00, conditioned upon a return of the property to said Sheriff, or the pay- ment of the reasonable value of the property, not exceeding $2250.00 in the event it shall finally be adjudged that he is not the owner of the property; which bond shall be madw without the said W, T. Edwards waiving any rights which he may have under and by virtue of decrees and judgments already entered in Rowan County Court, or bv reason of ownership of the property herein question, k bi Michael Schenck, Judge of Suverior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, however acquired, By Consent: Lewis & Lewis, Attys. for Plaintiff gE, M, Lamd, Atty. for We Te Edwards. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT? : me IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 290 MAY TKRM, 1927 a MAY TERM, 1927 sc Wednesday, June 1, 1927. North Carolina ’ In the Sunerior Court, Iredell County. A. Y. Alexander, et al, Stockholders, and S, J, Sligh & Company, et al, Creditors of Ballance-Sullivan Company, in behalf of themselves and all others who may come in and make themselves parties plaintiff, REPORT OF RECKI VER vs, Sc et et ce BALLANCB#SULLIVAN COMPANY The undersigned Keceiver begs leave to report that, agreeable to the orders of the Court heretofore made in this case, he did from time to time sell the merchantable articles of the goods, wares and merchandise of Ballancee Sullivan Company, receiving therefore elghty per cent of the cost value, and that after completing sai@ sale there remained on hands odds and ends con= sisting of fluvoring extracts, old stvle writing tablets, washing powders, a Lot of drugs and nedicines, all of which were unsalable to retail merchants, but which were inventoried at approximately $700.00; that he has disposed of these articles for the sum of $300.00; that he has also Gisposed of the office furniture and fixtures for $200.00 cash; that all of sania sales were, in the opinion of the receiver, full and fair value of the articles sold; This Keceiver fiwther reports that so far in his administration of his luties as Kecetver he has incurred expense for the rent of the building since his anpotntment un untt] the lst of June at $60.00 per month; that there are outstanding taxes against the property of the Ballance-Sulli van Company due the County of Iredell and the City of Statesville; that these taxes are pre» ferred liens, the amount due the County heing $226.05, and the amount due the City being $214.50; WHEIEFORK, he respectfully asks the Court to confirm said sale, and that he be allowed to pay the taxes due the County and G4 ty out of the funds in his hands as the authorities are der anding settlement, and that he be authorized and empowered to pav the rent of the building up to June lst, 1927, at which time he will durrender said byt lding to the owner 4 4 . This the 40th day of May, 1927, J. R. RICK, RECEIVER OF BALLANCB- SULLIVAN COMPANY BY Grier & Grier, Attorneys, North Carolina, Iredell County, In the Superior Court. Wednesday, June 1, 1927, A. ¥, Alexander, et al, Stockholers, and 8, J. Sligh & Company, et al, Graditors of Ballance-Sullivan Company, in behalf of themselves and all others who may come in and make themselves parties plaintiff, ORDER VB. eee a | BALLANCK-SULLIVAN COMPANY Upon reading the report of J, R, Rice, Receiver of Ballance-Sulli van Company, filed on May SOth, 1927, in the above entitled case, and it sppearing to the Court that the action of said Receiver in selling the merchantable goods, wares and merchandise of the stock of the defendant at eighty per cent of the cost value is inccompliance with the former order of the Court and that the sale of the renmant of said stock at the price of $300.00 and the sale of the office j we ho 6 “ae ” e furniture and fixtures at the price of $200.00 {1s the full and fair value of said property; Tt is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that all t , 4 1 same are ‘eby cont ned: of said sales by said Receiver be and the same are hereby confirmed; 5 > vat sy f t - > ? ds Tt is further ordered and adiudeed that the Receiver, out of the fun M me vy f } Cc f ia AS TA Uv | ea in his hands, pay off the taxes due the County and City and pay the rent due on aoe said building oceupied by him up until June lst, 1927 at the rate of 60,00 per month. This cause is hereby retained for further order, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, 4 North Carolina, In the Super‘or Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1927, Martha J, Ostwalt ‘ ' VBe 4 (4 4 F, M. Ostwalt This cause coming on to be heard and bel ng heard before His Honor, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding, at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, after notice to the defendant, upon the pleadings and affidavits filed in this cause, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and the Defendant are man and wife and that thev are living separate and apart from each other: It is therefore considered and ordered by the Court, that the Defendant pay to the Plaintiff for herself and her attorneys the sum of One Hundred Dollars on or before the first day of July 1927, the same being Alimony Pendente Lite at the rate of twenty five dollars per month, for the months ef April, May, June, and July, 1927. This cause is retained for further orders, Michael Schenck, Judgo Presi ding. \ 292 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, May Term 1927, \ Tredell County. \ @muel Corry vs, JUDGMENT Anna May Corry This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor, Hon ’ 7 orable Michael Schenck and a Jury and the jury having answered the issues sub mitted to them in favor of the plaintiff, as follows: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the state of North ¢ ; arolina fop more than two years préor to the commencement of this action the complaint? a Answer: Yes, Were the plaintiff and defendant married as all a Answer: Yes, eged in the complaint? Did the defendant Anna May Corry, commit ad seinen 7 y> ultery as alleged in the Answer: Yes, Wherefore, it is ordered adjudged and decreed by the court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and defendant be @isloved, and that the Plaintiff, Bmul Corry is hereby given and absolute di- vorce fromthe defendant, Anna May Corry, It is further ordered that the plaintirr pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This 30th day of May, 1927, Michael Schenck, Judge Presiding. \ North Carolina, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, H, A. Yount VB. NON-SUIT L. B. Patterson H, A, Yount, the plaintiff, comes into open Court and takes a voluntary non-suit as their differences have been compromised and settled. The cost sf to be taxed against the plaintiff. This May 30, 1927. J. A. Hartneass, Clerk Superior Court. BQO CORQEOEECAGCA@QQIG@ CALA ALAS ASM (WW @LQQQQQE@ In the Supertor Court, Iredell County. W. C. Johnston & Co, V8e JUDGMENT FINAL BEFORE THE CLERK ON A NOTE, Duke Overcash, Bruce Overcash, I, M. Overcash, W. J. Overcash, Lula B, Owens, S, L. Overcash This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, May 30th, 1927, and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in this action caused a summons to be issued from the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 15th day of March, 1927 against the defendants and that personal service of said summons was made on all the defendants by leaving with them a copy of the summons. And it appearing further to the Court that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court on the llth day of April, 1927, and that this is a cause ofaction on a promissory note for an amount certain and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the service of the said summons, and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the return date named in the summons and that the defendants have not filed an asnwer deny- ing the complaint or raising any issue of fact and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendants the sum of $266,68 with interest from March 30th, 1925, at the rate of six per cant per annum, untid Paid on account of said noté, It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants in this action the sum of $266.68, with interest thereon at six per cent from March 30, 1925 until paid, and the cost of this action to be taxed by ths Clerk of this Court. This the 6 day of June, 1927. J, A, Hartness, Clerk Superior Court, 294 fore Saeephne: In the Superior Court, Iredell County. W. C. Johnston & Co, vs. JUDGMENT FINAL BEFORE THE CLERK ON A NOTE, ¥. J. Overcash, Bruce Overcash, I, M, Overcash, Duke Overcabh, Lula B, Owans, 8. L. Overcash This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Suw rior Court of Iredell County on Monday, May SOth, 1927, and being heara and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff in this action caused a summons to be issued from the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 15th day of March, 1927 against the defendants and that personal service of said summons was made on all the defendants by leaving with them a covy of the summons, And it appearing further to the Cowt that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Sum rior Court on the llth day of April, 1927, and that this is a cause of action on a promi- ssory note for an amount certain and that move than twenty days have alapsed from the service of the said summons, and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the return date named in the summons and that the defendants have not filed an answer denying the complaint or raising any issue of fact and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendants the sum of $266.68 with interest front March 30th, 1925, at the rate of six per centper annum, until paid on account of said note, It is, therefore ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff recover of the defendants in this action the sum of $266.68, with interest thereon at six per cent from March 50, 1925 until paid, and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This the 6 day of June, 1927, J. A, Hartness, Clerk Superior Court, COM PE CRAEOEQQORE @are@@@e North Carolina, 8 Iredell County, In the Sur rior Court. W. GC, Johnston & Co, vs. JUDGMENT FINAL BEFORE THE CLERK ON A Lula 3, Owens, Duke Overcash, ee W. J. Overcash, I, M, Overcash, Bruce Overcash, 5, L. Overcash This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of, thé 4.) Superior Vourt of Iredell County on Monday, appearing to the Court that the plaintiff ih this action caused a summons £0, t of Iredell County on the 15th aay defendants and that peranal service of said su was made on all the defendanys by be issued from the Clerk of the Superior Cour of March, 1927 against the leaving with them a copy of the summons. May 50th, 1927, and being heard and. 295 And it appearing further to the Court that the plaintiff filed a duly yerified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court on the llth day of April, 1927, an that this is a cause of action on a promissory note for an amount certain and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the service of the said summons, and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the re- turn date named in the summons and that the defendants have not filed an answer denying the complaint or raising any issue of fact and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff is entitled torecover of the defendants the sum of $266.68 with interest from March 30th, 1925, at the rate of six per cent per annum, until paid on account of said note, It is, therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants in this action the sum of $266.68, with interest thereon at six per cent from March 50, 1925 until paid, and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 6 day of June, 1927. J. A, Hartness, Clerk Superior Court. BCOQGEO@OOOE CO@OE@O CAMQCQC@E North Carolina In the Superior Court, or ‘ Iredell County Before the Clerk. rede v. W. C, Johnston & Co. JUDGMENT FINAL BEFORE THE CLERK VS ON A NOTE. I. M, Overcash, W. J, Overcash, Duke Overcash, Bruce Overcash, Lula B. Owens, 8, L. Overcash This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, May 30th, 1927, and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in this action caused a summons to be issued from the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 15th day of Marck, 1927 against the defendants and thatperapnal service of said summons was made on all the defendants by leaving with them a copy of the summons, And it appearing further to the Court that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court on the lith day of April, 1927, and that this is a cause of a ction on a promissory note for an amount certain and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the service of the said summons, and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the retum date named in the summons and that the defendants have not filed an answer Court ct and it appearing to the denying the complaint or raising any issue of fa 266.68 thatthe plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendants the sum of $ r with interest from March 3@¢h, 1925, at the rate of six per cent per engum, until paid on account of said note. It is. therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover ofthe 8, thereon at six per defend nts in this action the sum of $266.69, with interest a action to be cent from March 30, 1925 until paid, and the cost of this ac by the Clerk of this Court. tate. oe 9 bea © “aed a : a eRe ti 296 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. J. C. Overcash and J. C, Blackwelder vs. JUDGMENT S. L. Overcash, Duke Overcash, W, J. Overcash, Lula B, Owens, Bruce Overcash, I. M. Overcash, and M, A, Christy This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, C. S, C. on Monday, June 6, 1927, and being heard and it appearing that the summons in this case was issued on May 17, 1927 and that the verified complaint was filed in the Sure rior Court of Iredell County on May 17, 1927 and it further appearing that Summons was served on and copy of complaint was delivered to each and every of the defendants on May 17, 1927 and it further appearing that twenty (days have elapsed since the service of summons and complaint and that no answer has been filed and that the action is on anote, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiffs revover of the defendants the sum of Two Hundred Seventy-five Dollars with interest thereon from May 16, 1927 at six per cent per. annum and the cost of this action to be paid by the defendants, Monday, June 6, 1927, J. A, Hartness, Clerk Superior Court, QOERECE® Ch@RR@@E @@@@@ North Yarolina » In the Superior Court Iredell County. Grier-Lowrance Construction Company, | @vs- 8 i JUDGMENT H. R. Cowles and R, L. White i It i appearing to the Court that the defendants have settled in full w the plaintiff for the amount involved in this action, including cost. It is, the sai the same is hereby dismissed,” CON#idered and adjudged that the action be and J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court Approved Grier & Grier Attorneys for Plaintirr, Sheth Se tetitt tetb aeet ae te oe gee THEE e se site se Tetetetetete North Carolina, } Iredell Counby. } In the Supprior Court, w.W. Rankin Company } vs Q JUDGMEN®T, D. M. Templeton, : This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Ceurt and being heard and it appearing that swmmons was issued on May 25, 1927 and compiaint properly verified was filed on May 25, 1927, demanding amougts certain due by note and account and it further appearing that summons was served on the defefidant by reading summgns to and leaving a copy of the summons and complaint with the defendant. And it further ap- peraring that 50 days have slapsed since the said service and no answer has been filed; It is therefore ordered amd adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $687.20 with interest on $3520.78 from November 1, 1926 and on $366.42 from Oct. 1, 1926 at six percent, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the defendant. This the 27th day of June, 1927. “+eFy A. Hartneess Clerk Superior Court. SeSeSEtb Shae HE Seietele deststiedHe North Carolina, 4} In the Superior Court Iredell County. 4} Before the Clerk. \ C. A. Stearns vs JUDGMENT. Thos E. Hart, W E Graham, J. F, Mulligan, RG Foster, C F Lineberry and Paul Joines. This cause coming on to be heard before hia Honor J A Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, upon motion of the plaintiff to render a judgment in his fayer and against the defendants. It appearing to this Court that there has been no answer filed ang that the time for filing has expired and that the defendants have not filed a motion in this cauee to extend said time for filing said answer; And it further appearing to this Court that the defendants are just. ly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Seven Hundred and fifty Dollars with interest on that amount from March the 10th 4927, until paid and for the cést of this action. It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that defendants pay to the plaintiff the sum of ($750.00) Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars with interest on that amount fpom the Tenth day of March 1927, until paid at the rate of six percent per annum and that they be taxed with the cost of this action, Rendered this the llth day of Zuly, 1927. J. A. Hartness Clerk as the Supepior Court DFE eae eo tetebeseseié ee Tesh testestititiesesest North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Monday July 11, 1927 Eugene Morrison, Jr, vs JUDGMENT, W. C. Moore, J C Brookshire, and R M Davidson, A P Davidson Joe Davidson and R F Davidson, Executors of the Estate of J A Davidson, ? This cause coming on to be Beard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court of Tbedell County, on Monday July 11, 1927, and it appear- ing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on May 10th 1927, and served on the defendants by personal service on the 14th day of May, 1927, at which time a copy of the pamtatife's verified complaint was delivered and served with the summons on the defendants; And it appearing to the Court that the defendants, W C Moore, and J C¢ Brookshire, have filed no answe r within twenty days after the date. defendants, Executors of the Estate of J A Davide son, have filed an answer, admitting the execution of said note on the part of their testator, but setting forthe that his liability is that of an endorse? and that judgment in this : of said service and that the Sase shall not constitute a lien in so far as the estate of J A Davidson id conserned, but shall operate only to fix the amount of the plaintiff's claim as against the estate of J A Davidson and that his liability is secondary and that of W. C. Moore, as principal of the note, is primary-.; And it appearin to the Court that the defiendants are indebted to the plaintiff by promissory note in words and figures certain, in the amount of $300.00, with interst from May.28th, 1925, until paid; It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plain- tiff recover of the defendant the sum of $300.00 with interest from March 28th 1925, until paid, and the costs of thid action and that said judgment shall not constitute a lien against the Executors of the Estate of J A Davidson, but simply shall prove the claim for participation in the assets of said estate and no costs shall be fixed against the estate of J A Davidson. It is fubther ordered that the costs of this case be taxed against the defendants, WC Moore and J C Brookshire,, J A Hartness Clerk Superior Court. By Consent: / John A Scott Attorney for plain Grier and Grier orney for Estate o J A Davidson. Sete thse ce te fete Se ieiesesetecet 300 North Carolina 3 In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Cambridge Bank, Plaintiff VS. JUDGMENT E. M. Hobdon and James M, Hobson, partners trading and doming business under the firm name and stmle of Hobson & Hobson Defendants SSS See CD This cause coming on to be heard hefore the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action wherein the complaint sets forth an action against the defendants consisting of the breach of an express contract to pay absolutely the sum of monéy hereinafter set out and definitely fixed by the terms of the contract; And it further appearing that the summons, together with a copy of the complaint, was personally served on each of the defendants and that said com~ plaint duly verified was filed in this office at the time of issuing said summons; And it further appeating that more than twenty days have @lapsed and expired since the service of said summons and copy of camplaint on each of the defendants, and that said defendmts have failed to answer said complaint within the time allowed by law; And it further appearing that the note set out in plaintiff's complaint was made, executed and delivered in the State of South Carolina, and was payable in said State, and is a contract of the said State of South Carolina and that by the laws of the State of South Carolina Plaintiff is allowed and entitled to charge and receive eight per cent interest per annum, said interest to be due and payable annually, and upon default in the payment of interest annually the said interest to draw eight per cent per annum until paid; It is, Therefore, Considered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the Plaintiff recover of the defendants and each of them the sum of $1800.00, with interest thereon from November, 1925 at eight per cent per annum, payable annually Plus ten per cent attorneys fee, Subject to a credit of $785.00 on January 14th, 1926, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by this Court, | This Monday, July 18th, 1927, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County. C2c@Q@ae Cea) Yorth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. Merchants and Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N. C. VEe D, A. Beam and L. A. Beam, and L. Ae Beam personal representative of D. A. Beam — Ae oe This proceeding again coming on to be heard, and it appearing that the said Dent Turner and Zeb. V. Turlington, Commissioners, avpointed by the Court to sell the lands described in the petition of the plaintiff, did, on the 18th day of April, 1927, after due advertisement, sell at public auction to Mre. L. A. Beam, the land described in the petition, at the price of Seven Hundred Dollars ($700.00) cash, and it appearing to the Court that the said sale was in all respects duly and properly conducted and made, and that the price offered as aforesaid was and is just md reasonable and a fair value of said lands; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said sale be, and it is hereby, in all respects confirmed, and the said Dent Turner and Zed. V. Turlington, Commissioners as aforesaid, upon the payment of the pur- thase money and ewery part thereof, shall execute and deliver to the said pur- chaser and her heirs and assigns a deed in fee simple for the said lands; ;and q the said Commissioners as aforesaid, upon receipt of said purchase money, shall pay the same into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court to be used in satisfying the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in this action. This 18th day of July, 1927. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court COLMCHMMAL ALOR: “ CQLCRLOLRHLE North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. Before the Clerk. Statesville Hardware Company V8. NON-SUIT W, Raéx Smith and wife, Grace Horney Smith. The plaintiff above nemed, having come into open Court and asked that this action be non-suited, It is now Bhdsred that the plaintiff be and is hereby non-suited and that the plaintiff pay the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk, Entered at 9:30 A. M., July 28th, 1927. J, A, Hartness ~“Clerk of rates Court o02 Worth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. Before the Clerk, Tora Teague vs. S. R, Morrison, and R. L. Reavis and Byron Teague, Administrators of C, G, Teague, deceased and A. P, Davidson, R. F. Davidson, J. C. Davidson, and R. M. Davidson, Executors of J. A. Davidson, deceased, and D. W, Wollen, Administrator of J. A, Wise, deceased, Ce Se es > ee ee a ee This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Suverior Court of Iredell County on Monday, the 25th day of July, 1927, and it appeareing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on March 23, 1997 and served on the defendants by personal service and by exceptance of service on March 31, 1927 and that saia Summons was returnable on April 4, 1927; that the Plaintiffs verified complaint was filed in the office of this Court on March 23, 1927: It further appearing to the Court that the defendants S, R, Morrison, and KR, L, Reavis and Byron Teague, Administrators of C. G. Teague, deceased have filed no answer within the twenty days from the return date or twenty days from the daid service and that the defendants, Executors of the estate of J. A, Davidson, deceased and Administrator of the estate of J, A. Wise, deceased have filed ansanswer, admitting the execution of said note on the part of their testators, but setting forth that their liability is that of @ndorsers and that judgment in this cause shall not constitute a lien in so far as the estate of J. A, Davidson and J, A. Wise are concerned, but shall operate only to fix the amount of the plaintiffs cleim as against the estates of J, A. Davidson and J, A. Vise, and that their liability is a secondary and that S. R. Morrison is prine Cipal of the note is primary; It further apppearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff by a promissory note in words and figupes certain, in the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-nine & 11/100 Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of 61x per centum per annum from January 12, 1925, until paid; It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged ana decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-nine & 11/100 Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum perannum from January 12, 1925, until paid and the cost of this action and that said judgment shall not constitute a lien against the Executors and Administrators ae - estates of J. A, Davidson, deceased Be cee = » J. A, Wise, deceased, and C,. G, Teague Claim on Participation in estates, This the 25th day of July, 1927, Iredell County. North Carotina, In the Suverior Court, Before the Clerk. Jackson Smith VBe JUDGMENT C, E. Stout, widow This ¢ause coming on to be heard and being heard on the 11th day of July 1927, by the undersigned, J. A, Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County: And it further appearing to the Court that the summons in the action was issued on the lst day of June 1927, and returnable on tke 16th day of June 1927; And it further appearing to the court that the said summons and a verified copy of the complaint filed in the action was served on the defendant, C. E, Stout, widow on the 2nd day of June 1927 by reading said summons and said verified copy of the complaint to the defendant and by leaving a copy of said summons and the complaint with the defendant; And it further appearing to the court that more thantwenty (20) days have elapsed since the return date of said summons and no answer or demurrer has been filed by the defendant; And it further appearing to the court that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff, Jackson Smith, in the sum of one thousand six hundred and seventy-three dollars and eighty-seven cents ($1,673.87) with interest thereon from the Slst day of May 1927, until paid and forthe cost of this action to be taxed by the court; It is, therefore, further considered, ordersd and adjudged by the court that this judgment be a specific lien upon the jand described in the com- Plaint of the plaintiff; It is further ordered and adjudged by the court that W, A, Bristol be and he is hereby appointed a commissioner of this court to sell the land be- longing to said defendant as described in the complaint filed in this action at public auction for cash after @iving due notice as required by law, at the Court House Door, in the City of Statesville, North Carolina and at four (4) other public places in Iredell County, on Wednesday, the Slst day of August 1927, at 12:00 o'clock noon and report his action in the premises to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, within ten (10) days after said sale; It is further ordered and adjudged that said commissioners shall pay out of the proceeds arising from said sale the cost and expense of sale and shell pay the plaintiff the amount due him and the remainder, if any, to said defendant; It is further ordered and adjudged by said court that the plaintiff may be allowed to bid on the land of the defendant at the sale of said land by the commissioner; This the llth day of July 1927. and this cause is retained for further opders of the court, 302 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Tora Teague V8. S. R, Morrison, and R. L. Reavis and Byron Teague, Administrators of C, G, Teague, deceased and A. P, Davidson, R, F, Davidson, J. C. Davidson, and R. M. Davidson, Executors of J. A. Davidson, deceased, and D, W, Wollen, Administrator of J. A, Wise, deceased, eS eg > et st Ce eet Thts cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, the 25th day of July, 1927, and it appeareing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on March 23, 1927, and served on the defendants by personal service and by exceptance of service on March 31, 1927 and that said summons was returnable on April 4, 1927; that the plaintiffs verified complaint was filed in the office of this Court on March 23, 1927: It further appearing to the Court that the defendants Ss, R, Morrison, and R, L, Reavis and Byron Teague, Administrators of C. G,. Teague, deceased have filed no answer within the twenty days from the return date or twenty days from the daid service and that the defendants, Executpons of the estate of Jo Ay Davidson, deceased and Administrator of the estate of J, A. Wise, deceased have filed ansanswer, admitting the execution of said note on the part of their testators, but setting forth that their liability is that of endorsers and that judgment in this cause shall not constitute a lien in so far as the estate of J. A, Davidson and J. A. Wise are Concerned, but shall operate only to fix the amount of the plaintiffs cleim as against the estates of J, A. Davidson and J, A. Wise, and that their liability is a secondary and that S,. R, Morrison is prin- cipal of the note is primary; It further apppearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff by a promissory note in words and figupes certain, in the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-nine & 11/100 Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from January 12, 1925, until paid: It is, therefore, or dered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the Plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-nine & 11/100 Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum perannum from January 12, 1925, until paid and the Cost of this action and that said judgment shall not constitute a lien against the Executors and Administrators of the ee estates of J. A, Davidson, deceased, J. A, Wise, deceased, and C. G, Teague dece ased, but simply shall Prove claim on participation in the assets of the estates, This the 25th day of July, 1927, J Hartness erk Superfor Co @@0@C@EHE ~@ CLRERRE CRECEGOOAQR,. North Carotina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, Jackson Smith V8e JUDGMENT C. EB. Stout, widow This Gause coming on to be heard and being heard on the 11th day of July 1927, by the undersigned, J. A, Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County: And it further appearing to the Court that the summons in the action was issued on the lst day of June 1927, and returnable on the 16th day of June 1927; And it further appearing to the court that the said summons and a verified copy of the complaint filed in the action was served on the defendant, C, E. Stout, widow on the 2nd day of June 1927 by reading said summons and said verified copy of the complaint to the defendant and by leaving a copy of said summons and the complaint with the defendant; And it further appearing to the court that more thantwenty (20) days have elapsed since the return date of said summons and no answer or demurrer has been filed by the defendant; And it further appearing to the court that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff, Jackson Smith, in the sum of one thousand six hundred and seventy-three dollars and eighty-seven cents ($1,673.87) with interest thereon from the 3lst day of May 1927, until paid and forthe cost of this action to be taxed by the court; It is, therefore, further considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that this judgment be a specific lien upon the jand described in the com- plaint of the plaintiff; It is further ordered and adjudged by the court that W, A. Bristol be and he is hereby appointed a commissioner of this court to sell the land be- longing to said defendant as described in the complaint filed in this action at public auction for cash after @iving due notice as required by law, at the Court House Door, in the City of Statesville, North Carolina and at four (4) other public places in Iredell County, on Wednesday, the 3Slst day of August 1927, at 12:00 o'clock noon and report his action in the premises to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, within ten (10) days after said sale; It is further ordered and adjudged that said commissioners shall pay out of the proceeds arising from said sale the cost and expense of sale and shall pay the plaintiff the amount due him and the remainder, if any, to said defendant; It 4s further ordered and adjudged by said court that the plaintiff may be allowed to bid on the land of the defendant at the sale of said land by the commissioner; and this cause is retained for further onders of the court. This the llth day of July 1927. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM 1927 Monday, August 1, 1927, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. August Term 1927, Be it remembered that a Superior Court beguneand held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the Sth Monday before the lst Monday in Septem- per, 1927, the seme being the First day of August, 1927 A. D., when and where His Honor, T. B. Finiey, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the Fifteenth Judicial District, Fall Term, 1927, is present and presiding, and The Hon. Zeb Vv. Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M. P, Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and re- turned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the First week of this term of the Surerior Court, to-wit: The followling were drawn and sworn asnGrand-Jurors for the term: 8,9 Whitener, J. B. Levan, E. C. Deaton, G. M. Kipka, C. S,. King, J. E. Williford, A. F, Gaither, D. 8. Brown, ”. P. Sprinkle, R. E. Gatton, S. J. Stewart, F. J. Bass, D. I. Troutman, T. P. Guy, M. A. Whitlow, Fred Crawford and H, C,. Mohler. E. C. Deaton was appointed and sworn as foreman of the Grand-jury. 0. B. Lazenby was appointed officer of the Grand-Jury. G. G. Feimster J. L. Ballentine, T. L. Davidson/were excused for lawful causes, €. ©. Hudspeth and J. C. Munday were returned not to be found in Iredell County. The fodlowing were drawn and sworn as petty jurors for the week: HM. M Hoke, T. L. Dysard, W. H. Moore, Q. L. Godfrey, W. P. Morton, EB, L. Warren, J. Will McCoy, R. A. Stamper, and G, E, Hoke. No. 3 LARCENY. \ State Alias Capias and Continued, V8e Lewis Campbell No. 4 FALSE PRETENSE, State Alias Capias. vs. Hal W. Walker No. 5 TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR. State Continued under former order, vs, June McLean \ No. 7 SELL LIQUOR. \ State Alias Capias. vs. Lonnie Allen No. 10 DISTURBING RELIGIOUS WORBEPP. State Nol Prossed with Leave. VS. Lonnie Holland Dwight Holland Blay Stevenson Harvey Little 306 Nos. 11, 12, 13, 14 State V8. Frank R, Brown No. 27 State VSe Frank Wilson alias W. D. Gerald No. 28 State VS. W. B. Watson alias W. D. Gerald No. 35 State V8, Roosevelt McKinley Theodoria McKinley No. 20 State v3. Seaf Turner No. 18 State vs, R. C. Jones No. 15 State v8, Johnson Wilson Ben Teague SS _— ©S onc Ooccs ~@ xo a See ee Oe > IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM LOB7, Monday, August 1, 1927, EMBEZZLEMENT Continued by consent, LA © defendant comes into open Court and sel enters a plea to guilty to giving wothiecse as Coun. which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the seen It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that th tate, ant be imprisoned in the sommon Jail of Iredel} C defend. for a period of Twelve Months and assigned to 4 an work as he is able or capable of doing on the publi’ or at the home of the aged and infirm, ADL LC roads CHECK-FLASHING, Nol Prossed with Leave, ating yp AND LARCENY, The defendants come into open Co Storebreaking and Larceny oe ets ab reg alge ” It 18 ordered and adjudged by the Court that the def ants each be imprisoned in the common jail of lreagare County for a term of Twelve Months and assigned to work on public roads of said County fon said period, DISPOSING OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY, The defendant called and failed, Capias. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and FORGERY, The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty to giving worbhless checks whi ~ ¥ Soltottor Fan the Nee. ch plea is accepted by the t is ordered and adjudged b ’ y the » ant be imprisoned in the common sada a redell, Comme a term of Six Months and assigned t of said County for said period, etna OF AN AUTOMOBILE, P waive BELL and plead gol rey Pe basen emough thet sou u y oO : charged in the eenehet. Larceny of an Automobile as PDP ig sit. and adjudged by the Court thet the defend- ; © imprisoned in the common jail of Ipedell County for < cEN . wpe te ae OSE HNC TE es TE Peete OmNNS che anon Deak to ne aoeere are authorized to hire t eir fathers or some other person Detierg tr ce that they give bond in Sum of Five vumired Superior C appear at each January and August Terms of the to serve eae for two years and show. good behavior, and laws. On ae of sentence if they violate and of eee tuther condition of fact that they pay the costs he on and make satisfactory arramgements with - owner of the Automoblie, oe This Honorable Court takes a recess framx until Tuesday Monti August 2, 1927 at 9:30 O'Clock A M ) EN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM 1927 fuesday August 2, 1927. Thies Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment Tuesday Morning August 8, 1927 at 9:50 O'clock A. M. for the dispatch of business. No. 22 State ve Herbert G. Morrison No, 34 ‘State vs Doy Shoemaker No, 32 & 355 State vs Ted Dishman and Lester Brewer. . No 56. \ State Vs Doke Easter i NON-SUPPORT AND ABANDONVENT. The defendant tenders a plea of guilty of failure { to support the child, which plea is accepted by the { State. Nol Pros as to the wife. ¢ Judgment of the Court is that the prayer for judg- § ment be continued upon the defendant's giving bond an § the sum of $750.00, to be approved by the Clerk, con- ~/ } ditioned upon his paying into the Clerk of the Court:!° a each month the sum of $15.00 for support of the child; further condition, that he pay on or before January 1,1928, the sum of $25.00, doctor's bill incurred at the birth of the child; and further conditioned upon the fact that the defendant appear at each January and August term of the Superior Court for the next two years and show that he has complied with the order of the Court and abide by any other order of the Court } that may be subsequently made. , It is, of course, understood that this case is held open for such additional orders as the Court may deem best at any future term of the Court for the { benefit of the child and parties concerned in the case. TRANSPORT AND POSSESSING LIQUOR. The defendant comes into open court and pleads Not Guilty. Jury No. 1, after being sworn and em- pannelled for their verdict find the defendant ilty i of transporting and possessing liquor as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the “court that on )the charge for transporting the defendant be imprisionei in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWENTY MONTHS and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period. On the charge of pos- sessing liquor the defendant be imprisioned in the com- mon jail of Iredell Vounty for e term of TWENTY MONTHS To work on roads to take effect at the termination of first sentence. Capias to issue on subsequent order of court. STORE BREAKING AND LARCENCY. The defendants come into open court, and tender a plea of guilty of larcency of goods under the value of twenty dollars, which plea is accepted by the so-~- licitor of the “tate. FORGERY. The defendant comes into open court and waives finding of bill and enters a plea of ae to attempt (to commit forgery, which plea is accepted by the So- licitor for the tate. : nt of the After hearing the evidence the ju that the defendant be confined in the common Court is jail of fredell County for a term of SIX MONTHS, and assigned on the to work on the public roads of; said (§ county for said period. yORe ascendant comes into open court and waives find of bill and enters a plea of guilty to attempt to Seal tore > = plea is accepted & the So- for the State. Laatste as ordered and adjudged by the Vourt that defendant be confined in the common jaik of yunty for @ term of SIX MONTHS, and ass ad to Yen biie roads of said county for sa unt: Ghia period; this sentence to take effect upon the termination of the sentence in Ne, 36, No 38 State vB Doke Saster No 39 State vs Doke Easter No 31 “tate vs Quincy Sumrers No 19 State vs GlennEvans This Honorable August 3, 1927 at 9:30 O'clock A. M | SS De ee pes oe pee Des se Se A Ee SE HE DS EE ee SP ee es BE Ce ME: a Ses A a Ny Ne eS see ne Sa pees IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM 1927 TUESDAY? AUGUST 2, 1927 a p FORGERY. The defendant comes into open waives finding of bill and ectane a oten ae guilty of attempt to commit forgery. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jaiz of Iredell County for a term of SIX MONTES and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, capias to issue upon the further order of the Court, FORGERY. The defendant comes into open Co waives finding of bill and la He ge guilty of attempt to commit forgery. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell Vounty for a term of SIX MONTHS and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, capias to issue upon the further order of the Court. The defendant having expressed his wil- lingness to turn over the his car for the ppr- pose of indemnifying the parties from whom he had obtained goods, as far as possible; it further appearing to the court that partiés near Granite Falls, Caldwell County, have a lien on said car for repair, it is ordered that the car be sold and the proceeds applied first to the payment of the lienz, if any is proven, secondly, to the payment of the losses sustained by the parties from whom he obtained money or property by reason of the forgeries charged in these fiwe bills of indictment, BURGLARY The defendant comes into open court and — his counsel, Lewis « Lewis, enters a plea stiee itn ‘Rua the second degree, 8 accepte tae Menae, p by the Solicitor of It is ordered and adjudged b y the Court that the defendant be imprisioned in the eem- Site an Prisén for a period of his natural to wear stripes, and as- Signed to hard labor or such ; is able to perform, . ae tig ~~ a AN AUTOMOBILE © defendant comes into open court and soaapena' ace aie of an qutéhen te for golinahia, » Which plea is accepted by the It is ordered and ad jud ; | ged by the court - Neat the defendant be confined tn’ hes common Fate of Iredell County for a term of FOUR core and on account of his mental and phy- = condition, the County Commissioners are quested to keep him in the county Home under such conditions as they deem proper. Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning ce ¥ ae! ys ts udg@ presiding and Welding of 15th Judtcial District IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST $3 192%. This Honorable Court convenes accprding to adjourmment Wednesday Morn- _4ng August 5, 1927 at 9:50 O'clock, A. M. for the dispatch of business. | | \ \ No. 40 state vs Linn Jackson No. 50 \ State vs James Anthény \No. 21 ‘state va Fred McLelland \ No. 6 State vs Hooker Cornelius Tee vs John Ritchie \ No. 9 \ State vs Erby Keller \ No e 2 \ State vs Elmer Hiller No. 17 State vs Hose Brawley FORGERY The defendanf comes into open Court and phtets a plea of an attempt to commit forgery which plea is accepted by i } the Solisitor for the State. { IT is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant é ¢ be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO MONTHS, and assigned to work on public roads of said County of said period. fk ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. ) The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel Turner & Turner pleads not guilty. Jury No.1 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict return a verdict of guilty | of assault with a deadly weapon as charged in the bill of Inw | dictment. 4 Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in jail for a period of TWELVE MONTHS and assigned to work on the roads of Iredell County. The Comnty Commissioners are here- by authorized to hire him out upon the defendant's giving a } good bond in the sum of $300, conditioned upon his paying the § cost of this case and $66.00 hospital bill incurred by the pro- secuting witness, and further conditioned upon the fact that he appear at the August Term, 1928, and show that he has been of good behavior, especially toward the prosecutrix and has not violated the law in any other respect, and to serve the sentence here imposed in the ement he is ordered by the court to de so. HOUSEBREAKING AND LERCENY. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty to Housebreaking and Larceng as charged in the Bill of Indictment. be imprisoned in the. common jail of ‘#padell County for a term of TWENTY FOUR MONTHS, and assigned to work on public roads (ft IT is opdered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant 4 of said county for said per iod. CARRY CONCELLED WEAPON, The defendant comes into open Court and through his coun- ) sel D. L. Raymer plrads not guilyy. Jury No.l after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict return a verdict of not guilty. TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Continued under former order. ! )( be) i ON. ASSQULT WITH DEADLY WEAP CENY iaraahant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa | and Capias. HOUSEBREAKING Nol Proded With Leave. | No. 41 \ State va J. L. Sexton No. 32 & 33 State vs Ted Dishman Lester Brewer No. 16 State vs Jack Byers No. 24 & 26 State vs Lester Flowe No. 42 State vs James Wilson oe 23 & 25 State vs J. L. Sexton \ No. 29 State ve Lexi Phillips ee yf j ) j 4 i f ‘ Le NE PE EN ee ee Oe mee SE ee ee IN THE SUPERIOR CoURT AUGUST TERM 1927 ‘WEDNESDAY AUGUST §, 1927. GIVING WORTHLESS CHECK ugh Mitchel] waves bill. and placde a erenst bis counsel less cheat ne area y to giving worth- for, suderent be, Sontime on conelton defendant pay'Way of this action, 7 i Cr. STOREBRKEAKING AND LARCENY ) The defendants having plead guilty on Aug.2 Judgment 4f the Court is that the derendents be confined in jail for a period of EIGHT MONTHS and the Commissione are requeated to assign them to work at the County Home under the supervision of W.-C. Perry, in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the County Home, and ° at the end of SIXTY Days they are to be discharged upon the defendants giving a satisfactory bond for their ap- pearance at each August Term of Court for a term of TWO Years and show that they have been going to schoil and have not violated the law, and serve such additional por. tion of this sentence as the Court may direct, LARCENY In this case the defendant enters a plea of 11t of lareceny of property under the value of $20.00. Prayan for judgment continued until next term of the Court. The pig is ae in the sum of $200 by his father appearance at the next term of the further order of the Court. oie eas FOSSESS LIQUOR AND ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Nol Prosed ' Beg Ret Aes, comt- LARCENY The defendant through his attorney, Hugh Mitchell, waves ae eee enters a plea of guilty of pee jot of properf$yqof senbaae of less than $20, to-wit, $10. Prayer for judgment eee onan until the next term of the Court, and the defendant oad . care of Archie Zones, who agrees to look after 9 > riend of the court and the defendant and report . Archign ee eot next term of the court, and the defendant ani chie Jones are recognized in‘ the sum of $100 for his ap- ——— at the next term of the court. The cost is to be TRAMSPORT AND POSSESS AND SELL LIQU OR. The defendant comes i : a ag not guilty, So .2 ead ei nued until the next © defendant give judtified bond in the # rther condition that he pay the costs ©. arrest, ing $25 for service and expenses for making | f TRANSPORT AND POSSESS I ; Continued by eenbent. a ne AR TO oe ME EO nT AD oe No. 8 State vs Ed Miller North Carolina § Iredell Coungy } IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST 3, 1927. TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR. Judgment hereto foreentered is striken out and judgment of the Court is& that on the Gount for transporting TWELVE MONTHS on the roads, capias to issue on the further order of the Court. On the sountyfor possessing, the judgment heretofore entered is striken out and in lieu thereof the following: It appearing to the Court that the defendant had been engaged in lawful occupation and supporting his family, the judgment of the Court is that he pay a fine of $50.00 and the cost of thié action. WANUFACHURE AND POSSESS LIQUOR. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty as charged in the warrant. Prayer for judgment comtinued on payment of the costs of this action. In the Superior Court August Term 1927 HON. T. B. FINLEY, JUDGE PRESIDING. We, the Grand Jury for the August Term of Iredell County Superior Court 1927, beg leave to submit the following report: We have passed upon all bills sent before us by the Solicitor and have made due returns of same to the Court. The County Jail was visited and there were twenty four prisoners, ten white male, three white female, ten colored male and one colored fe- male. All prisoners report that they are well fed and cared for, the jail premises are kept in sanitary condition. We visited the County Chain-Gang in a Committée 66 four there were twenty on convicts, five white male and sixteen coloped male all in good heaath and theyreport plenty good food and good treatment, there were six~ teen mules and all in excellant conditdéon and the equipment in very good condition. fhis gan@ was working about five miles from camp, we visited the camp and inspected the sleeping quarters, kitchen, stable and other tents and we are pleasea to report that we found every thimg very neat, clean and in sanitary condition. We visited the County Home for the aged and infirm there were forty one inmates, fourteen white women, eight white men, eight colored women and eleven colo” »d men, one white woman was blind all inmates ap- parently in good health and well cared for. The farm is in excellent Condition, We inspected the Court house and its serveral offices and find re- cords neatly kept by latest methods in bookkeeping. ri me “+ Respectfully submitted, 2 wes IN THE SUPERICQR CouRT AUGUST TERM 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST 3, 1927, O. W. KETCHAM vs GREIR-LOWRANCE CONSTRUCTION CO. Tn this case it is ordered, on motion of the defen@ant, that it be allowed ten days in which to file an amended answeb, and at the same time furnishing the plaintiff copy of its said amended answer, State of North Carolina, -In the Superior Court County of Ipédéal August Term, 1927, Mary Parks Brown vs H. L. Brown This cause coming on again to be heard at the August Term of the i Iredekl Superior Court upon the citation duly issued and served upon the defend- ant’ to show cause why he should not be adjudged in comtempt of Court for his failure to apear by the orders of the Court heretofore made in this case, and the defendant appeared and stated to the Court that he did not have counsel and that he did not have any property and was suffering from 111 health and was kk therefore not able to comply with the orders of the Court at this time. WHEREFORE, it is ordered by the Court that the motion be continued until fhe November Term of Iredell Superior Court, 1927, in order that the de- fendant may have further time with in which to comply with the orders of the Court on condition that his recognitanse be taken in the sum of $200.00 to be present at the November 1927 term of Iredelll Superior Court and abide by the orders of the Court then made and this cause is retained for further orders, T. B. Finley Vidge Presiding G North Varolina, In the Superior Court Ired ll + ell County Sugust Term 1927, DeEtta East vs H. B. East IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST 3, 1927, First: Has the plaintiff been a citizen and resident of the State/of North Carolina for more than five consecutive years prior to the beginning of this action as alleged in the complaints? Answer: Yes. Second: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Third: Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Fourth: Have the plaintiff and defendant lived seperate and apart for m more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell Gounty. § August Term, 1927. DeEtta East vs JUDGMENT. H. B. East This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor T. B. Finley, Judge Presid- Tr ing and a jury, and the following issues having been submitted to the jury: First: Has the plaintiff been a citizen and resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five consecutive years prior to the beginning of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answere Yes Second: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Third; Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Fourth: Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action &8 alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST 3, 1927, All o@ said issues having been answered by the jury in the af. firmative. Therefore it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that + the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintirr, DeEtta East and defendant, H. B. East be, and the same are hereby dissolved and the Plaintigs DeEtta East is granted absolute divorce from the defendant H. B, East. It is further ordered by the Court that the Plaintiff be taxed with the cest of this action by the Clerk of this Court, T. B. Finle Judge Presiding. In the Superior Court, North Carolina, | Iredell County. 4 August Term 1927 J. P. Lambert vs Lula Lambert Ll. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint! Answer Yes 2. Did the Heféendane abandon the plaintiff ana live separate and apart from him for more than fave Consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action, and was said abandonment without fault of the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes Se Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the commencement of thia action? Answer: Yes, North ¢ 1 aroline, In the Superior Court, Iredell ¢ ell County. August Term 1927/ J. P. Lambert a JUDGMEN?D, Iula Lambert This cause Coming on to be heard at this term of the Court befor? his Honor, T.B, Finley, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answer ed the issued as follows; a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST 3, 1928. 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the com- plaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and live separate and apart from him for more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action, and was said abandonment without the fault of the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes, It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. 7, B. Finle Judge Pres Nge North Carolina, In the Superior Court August Term, 1927 | Iredell Cottnty. | Nellie Shoemaker § vs @kixz ¢ ta 8:9 Otis Shoemaker (6( 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Caro- lina two years immediatly preceeding the filing of this complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Did the @efendant Otis Shoemaker commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 16 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST 3, 1927. x 18 North Carolina, {| Iredell County. {| August Term, 1927. In the Superior Court, Nellie Shoemaker § vs ¢ JUDGMENT, Otis Shoemaker 4 This cause coming on to be heard at this Term before Hig Honor Judge T. B. Finley and a jury and being heard and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the record. It is therefére ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between Nellie Shoemaker and Otis Shoemaker be and the same are hereby disolved and that the eostube paid according to the Statutes in such cases made and provided. Tt. B. Finle Judge Presiding. Nort orth Carolina, | In the Superior Court , Iredell County. § August Term, 1027. Jesse M. Brown and others vs ORDER APPOINTING PERMANENT REGEIVER Brown Bag Company, Inc, Thi S cause coming on to be heard, pursuant to a former order in this cause, to ’ show cause by the Receivership heretofore decreed should not be made permanent: s rassed that it cannot successfully carry on its business, and that it is in eminent d anger of insolvency, if not already insolvent, and that the number of Gebts now due upon which suits are threatening, and the defendant having fail- ed to sho t " cause, why thet Temporary Receivership should not be made permanent: Now 7 ; THEREFORE it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court, that the receivership heretofore decreed, by an order in this action, be and .the same is hereby made permanent, : IT I S THEREFORE ORDEREDy that C. 4H. “earman be and he is hereby @P- pointed perma ° nent receiver of all the properties and effects of the defendant, — with all the rights and Powers invested in Res of this State; which order ig eivers of Corporations by the tae hereby made immediately effective. The Bond giv as Temporary Receiver to be said Bond, : effective as permanent receiver, as per terms of i ch has been @pproved by the Clerk of this Court, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST 3, 1927. T? 33 THEREFORE ORDERED, that s&dd Receiver shall within ten days, publish in the Statesville Daily, a newspaper printed and edited in States- ville, N. C. for once a week for four sucessive weeks, anotice to all cerdsto itors, claimants, stockholders and parties interested in the Brown Bag Company the defendant, to present all claims they may hame of any character whatso- ever, against the said Brown Bag Company, together with a statment of the securities, and priorties claimed; which claims shall be presented on or be- fore, the first day of December, 1927, or the same ill be barred from par- ticipating in the distribution of the assets of said defendant. Witin ten days after the first of December 1927, the Keceiver shall make a report to the Cpurt of a list of all claims general or preferred, and the assets of said defendant, which have been soid and converted into cash. Saad Receiver 4scauthorized and empowered, as provided by Law, to collect all open accounts, notes, and all evidence of indebtedness due the said Brown Bag Company, and to sell dispose of all the properties, stock, merchandise, materials, instruments of said manufacturing plaat, at public or private sale, by retail or as a whole for Cash, whth in the dis- cretion of said Receiver, and make report of his sale or sales to the Court, together with his accounting as required by the Statttes. This cause retained for further orderes. T. B. Finley Judgé Presiding August Term of the Superior Court Iredell County. North Carolina, 4 fn the superior Court Iredell County. 4} Augsut Term, 1927 B. L. Scponce, W.D. Turner, Vinton 4 Liddell Pickens and R. S. Pickems, 4 On behalf of themselves and all other { Stockholders and creditors who may 4 come in and make themselves parties ‘ Plaintiff in this action. ; ( ( ¢ } vs RECEIVERS REPORT. ) Link-Piskens Publishing Company, 4 Corporation. RZE PORT. Amount receivdd to date from sale of stock, collection of stock subscriptions and upon open accounts. $7,859.51 Amount paid out to date as of preferred claims and expenses of Receivership. 6,057.50 Balance on hand and deposited to the credit of Robt.A. Collier, Receiver in the Peoples Loan & Savings Bank, Statesville, N.C. $ 1,801.62 This the lst day of August, 1927. Robert A Collier ver. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AUGUST TERM, 1927 WEDNESDAY AUGUST 3, 1927. North Carolina, )( In the Superior Court. Iredell County. 4 Mrs Martha J. Ostwalt ( vs ( JUDGMENT, F. Mv. Ostwalt. i This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of the plain. tiff for alimony pendente lite, and being heard, the court declines to grant any alimony at this time but continues the motion until the November Term 1997 of this court; and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff is in Possesaq ion of the defendant's land and that neither of said parties have been able to have said land cultivated; and it further appearing to the court that said land should be cultivated or pvt in preparation for cultivation in order to » raise funds fér the support of the plaintiff and the defendant, if it be finally determined that the plaintiff is entitled to any support from the dee fendant; It is, tehrefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that R. C. Little, be, and he is hereby, appointed receiver to take charge of and have the land of defendant cultivated and put in condition for cultivation for the year 1928, said receiver to have such crops planted and grown on said land as in his opinion can be most profitably grown thereon; It 1s further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff and the defent- ant and their children and their agents and representatives and all other per- sona be, and they are hereby, restrained and enjoined from interfering with said receiver in the discharge of the duties imposed upon him by this order It is fubther ordered and adjudged that the possession of said re- ceiver is to extend only to the cleared land and such as is capable of cule tivation, and in order to cultivate the same he and his agents ape to have the possession and use of all stock, farming tools and implements belonging to the defendant on said farm; It is further ordered that neither the receiver nor the plaintiff are to interfere with the defendant in the sale of the standing timber on saad land by the defendant, and that the defendant be, and he is hereby, ale lowed to sell said timber for the best price obtainable in order to re-pay he sum af boprowed with which to pay the allowance made the plaintiff by hie. ss Honor Michael Schenck, at the May Term of Court, and pay the taxes due. on. said land and premises and the necessary personal expenses of the defenc euch as doctors bills, meddcine pilis, clothing and other personal nece and if any remain that he pay a reasonable attorney fee to Grier & orten any surplus be paid sm receiver to repair house,,. This cause is retained for further aorders, This the 8th day of August, 1927, | | North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. . Deaton, John L. Milholland { a w. R. Holland. ( vs t JUDGMENT. H. 0. Hunter 4 This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard, and it appear- ing to the Court that the plaintiffs caused a summons to be issued in this action on the 20th day of May, 1927, same being served by personal service on the said date, and that a verified complaint was filed by plaintiffs on the 4th day of June, 1927, the return date in said summons, and that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in certain summj of money, as set forth in said complaint, and as hereinafter set out, and that the defendant has failed to file am answer or demux to said complaint as required by law and within the time allowed by law: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum of $5450.00, together with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum on the following items or sums from the following dates until paid, to-wit; $200.00 interest from March 28, 1924 until paid. 500.00 interest from September 8, 1924 until paid. 250.00 interest from august t, 1925 until paid. 750.00 interest from December 19, 1925 until paid. 500.00 interest from March 1, 1926 until paid, 625.00 interest from May 19, 1926 until paid. 625.00 interest from July 27, 1926 until paid, 225.00 interest from September 30, 1926 until paid. 250.00 interest from December 7, 1926 until paid, 575.00 interest from December 19, 1926 until paid. 400.00 interest from May 21, 1927 until paid. 625.00 interest from May 26th,1927 until pai@. 75.00 interest from May 20, 1927 until paid. 50.00 interest from May 20, 1927 until paid. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recov- er of the defendant the further sum of $900.00 together with interest thereon from the 20th day of May 1927, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, and thm costs of this action to be paaddby the defendant. J. A. Hartness, EiSon. Clerk Superior Cour County. ShSHESEGEME SEE oe Ge URLERSesesE sett desete desk TMP bse sdb Sb seth sethth sesh hte ae tett North Carolina, {| In the Superior Court Iredell County. 4 Before the Clerk, W. C. Johnston & Co JUDG"ENT ‘FINAL BEFORE THE CLERK vs ON A NOTE. W. J. Ovrecash, Duke Overcash t § Bruce Overcash, J.M. Overcash,§ Lula B. Owens, S. L. overeat Thés cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk 6g the Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, August 15, 1927, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in this action caused summons to be issued from the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 7th’ Gay of July, 1927, against the defendants and that personal service of said sume mons was made on all the defendants by leaving with them a copy of the summons and a copy of the plaintiff's verified complaint prior to the return date mentione ed in the summons; And it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Court on the 7th day of July 1927, and that this is a cause of action upon a promissory note for an amount cere tain and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the service of said summons and verified complaint on each and all of the said defendants, and more then twenty days have elapsed from the return date named in the summons and that the defendants have not filed any answer denying the complaint or raised any issue of fact and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendants the sum of $266.67, with interest from March 50, 1925, at the rate of 6% per an- num, until paid on account of said note; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants in this action the sum of $266.67, with interest thereon at 6% from March 30, 1925, until paid and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court . This August 15, 1927, Je A. Hartness er perior Court. tts tee tect tee 2 2 ae oe ae TERE tte Sette se sete teiedy Sesh se sete st2¢-4¢ North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. p. M. Barger Lumber Co. Inc. | vs j JUDGMENT, Deep River Lumber Co. j This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, C S C and be- ing heard and it appearing that summons was served on the defendant returnable on June 27, 1927 and that a duly verified complaint was filed on June 10, 1927 in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County said suit being bond on account for lumber sold and it further appearing that no answer has been filed and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return day of said summons. It is therefore ordpped and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $314.01 with interest from July 1, 1926 at six per cent and that the cost be paid by the defendant. Monday August 15, 1927, J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Yourt/ 4, St, POSER SESE SE SESE SESE ESE ESE SE ts PETERS SETS te 38 te te Mtb se thse these North Carolina, In the Superior Court/ Ired@ll1 County. W. W. Rankin Company vs ME Mennerly and J L Kennerly This cause coming on to be heard before J A Hartness, C. 8S. C. and being herad, and it appearing that a properly verified complaint was filed on July 26, 1927 and that the summons was served on the defendants on July 27, 1927 by reading and delivering a copy of the complaint was also left with each of the defendants, that the actiom is bond on a note and account for an amount certain, that more than thirty days have elapsed since the service of the sum- mens and no answer has been filed. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of {286.63 with interest from November 1, 1926 at six Per cent per annum and the cost of this action, This Monday August 29, 1927. _J. A. Hartness sc AH North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County F. L. Stevens vs ) JUDGMEN®, Ae C. Crouch This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the g Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and being heard, and it appearé 4 . h ing to the Court that on the 4th day of August, 1gs27, plaintiff filed in the office of the Clerk ofnthe Court summons and cqmplaint in the above entitled action and on the seme date had copy of same served on this defendant; and it further appear- ing that said summons was returnable within thirty days from the date of service of said summons, which was on the 4th day of August, 1927 as aforesaid, and that more than thirty days has elapsed since the service of the aforessid summons and compl 1 ¢ Plaint and that he, the said defendant, has failed to appear and answer or de- mur ; ‘urt "3 and it further appearing thet this is an action for breach of an express contr D meract to pay absolutely a sum of money fixed by said contract, to-wit, for the r ] TWO? tf . ; recovery of TWO’ HUNDRED KIGHTY-EIGHT and 53/100 ($288.33) DOLLARS, with inte 2 ; nterest thereon as hereinafter set out; and it further appearing that the de- fendant i ; S due the plaintiff the sum of %288.53 with interest as hereinafter It i 7 eee Considered, adjudred and decreed that the plaintiff recover of th . © defendant the sum pf TRO HUNDERED EIGHT¥RIGHT and 33/100 ($288.53) llars, with i e . nterest on $38.33 from the 13th day of January, 1927 until paid; # ¢ eg oi 3; interest on gov» from the 13th day of March,1ge7 until of April until ; é Paid; interest on v0.00 from the 13th day of May, 1927 until pase paid; interest of $50.00 from the 13th day and interest on 50. 00 from the 13th day of June ,1927 until paid, together * On to be taxeq by the clerk of this Court, This the leth day of September, 1927, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court North Carolina, In the Superior Court | Iredell County/ Before the Clerk. | Wm. P. Holt ve JUDGMENT. Réy C. Tatum This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, C S C on Monday Sept. 26, 1927 and being heard and it appearing that the verified complaint in this case on a note was filed on July 29th,1927 and that a copy of the complaint and summons was served on the defendant on Aug. 1, 1927 and it further appear- ing that no answer has been filed and that more than thirty days have elapsed since the service of the summons and the filing of the complaint. It is therefore oredered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant ‘the sum of $2000.00 with interest from Sept. 1, 1920 at 6 per cent per annum subject to the following credits; $100.00 on Oct. 1, 1922, $34.25 on November 1, 1924, $25.00 on Oct. 26, 1925 and $25.00 on Nov. 30, x 1925 and the cost of this action. Monday Sept. 26, 1927. J. A. Hartness Cs C North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. D. E. Hayes. va JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUIRY Emma Hunter and H. C. Hunter, Non Compos Mentis by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Buren Jurney. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court on Monday, Ocbdberc?7, 1927, and being heard, and it appear- ing to the Court that the plaintiff in this action caused summons to be issued from the Clerk of the Superior Court of Ipedell County on the Yth day of August 1927, against the defendants and that personal service of said summons was made on the defendant Emma Hunter by leaving with her a copy of the summons and a copy of the plaintis verified complaint and that said summons was served upon Said defendant Emma Hunter on August 10, 1927; it further appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was sent to the sheriff of Burke County to be served upon H. C. Hunter who is a patient at the State Hospital for thes, InsanecatoMOrganton,; NasGyeand thatathenSuperintendeng}cDr. John VcCampbel] have ing informed said Sheriff that personal service could not be had because of dan. ger to said insane person, and that said summons was returned without persona) services betause of said information as provided by Section 440 by revisal of 1905 and it further appearing that John McCampbell, Superintendent of said In. sane liospital for insane at Morganton, N. C. certified under oath that H, ¢ Hunter was at the time of the service of said summons and is now @ patient in said hospital and that he believes him to be of unsound mind and remory; it further appearing to the Court that Emma Hunter wife of H. C. Hunter and the xnt said H. C. Hunter was given notice to appear before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on August 20, 1927 and make application for Guardian Ad Litem for the said H. Cc. Hunter, Non Compos Mentis and that said defendants failed to appear and make application for said appointment; further that the Attorneys for said plaintiff on September 15th applied to said Court to have a Guardian Ad Litem appointed for the said H. C. Hunter, Non Compos Mentis and that on September 15th, 1927 thia Court after due inquiry as to the fitness of tne person to be appointed, did appoint Buren Jurney who is a dis creet, fit, stitable and comptent person to act as Guardian Ad Litem for the said H C Hunter, It further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court on the 9th day of Augus 192 a h ‘ August, 1927, and that this is a cause of action upon a promissory mote for an amount sta Lert ane 1 al t stated and certain and that more than twenty days have elapsed from the servi ai . ce of said sunmons and copy of said verified complaint upon the defen Emma H and % efendant Emma Hunter and that Buren Jurney, Guardian Ad Litem of H. C. Hunter, Non Comp M “ oOmpos Mentis filed an answer to said comphaint admitting all the allega- tions of said comni: sla i id complaint, and more than thirty days have elapsed from the re- turn cat and s a © and service of said summons and verified complaint and thst the an- s er filed aid Guard ; ; a by said Guardian Ac Litem raises no issue of fact and it appearing to’ the Cour hs r ourt that the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant the sum of 800 200 wi > th interest thereon from January 16, 1927 at the rate of six per centu per annum until paid on account of said note; Le ag : ° therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff re- cover of the , defendant H. c. Hunter and Emma Hunter in this action the sum of $ $800.00 wi r a } with interest thereon at the rate of six per centum per annum from Jan- uary 16, 1927, un , » until paid and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk® of this Court, : This the 17th day of October, 1927, J. &. Hartness, Clerk of the @perior COURT \ No. \ State vs 0 4 \ No. 3 / | \ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1927 Monday November 7, 1927. Worth Carolina, | In the Superior Court November Term 1927. fredell County. 4} Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the state and County aforesaid, on the 9th Monday after the first Monday in September, 1927, the same being the 7th day of November, 1927, A D., when and where His Honor, T, B. Finley, Judge Presiding and Holding Courts for the Fifteenth Judicial District Fall Term, 1927, is present and presiding, and the Hon. Zeb V. Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. NM. P. Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the First week of this term of the Superior Court, t@-wit: The following were drawn and sworn as Grand-Jurors for the term: E Y Lee WL Davis, C H Knox, W B Campbell, L G Knox, A J Renegar, J W Joyner, J A Thomas, Charlie Hunterp W D Marlow, A W Johnson, C A Stewart, H B Hunter, E F Levan, P L and Carl W Murdock. J M Bridges, J B Brown Cartner, C H Knox, was appointed and sworn as foreman of the Grand-Jury. © B Lazenby was appointed officer of the Grand-Jury. ’ LR Smith, C M Douglas, C A Vickes, © L Moore, T L Gatton, G F Clontz, Robt Blackwelder and J W Torrence were excused for lawiul causes. The following were drawn and sworn as petty jurors for the week; C W Sprinkle, P M Go@frey, M Sample, A G Mills, D L Dingler, k W Browning, ii I Eidson, : and Mott Guy ,/R H Westmoreland,. LAKCENY Alias Capias. oe Elmer Miller j LARCENY \ State § Alias Capias. vs t Lewis Campbell Q FALSE PRETENCE Alias Capias No. 4 { State 4 iin ¥8 ¢ Hal W Walker ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Alias Capias. No. 6 4 State t vs ) Erby Keller No. 7 ) State t vs j Lonnie 4llen § SELL?LIGQUOR. Alias Capias. No. 9 Stete vs Herbert G Morrison No. 15 State vs Johnson Wilson Ben Teague No. 17 State vs led Dishman No. 18 etate vs Lester Brewer No. 183 State vs loy Mathis alias oy Mathis No. 19 State V8 vames Anthony Noe 20 State vs Feildon NM Privett No. 23 . State vs Bob Hursey No. 41 State vs Jack Mayhew RE /OURT ADJOUKNS IN HONOR § : ‘ { (¢ 4 ‘ 4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 Monday Novemberga 7, 1927, NON-SUPPORT. Continued under former order, LARCENY OF AUTOMOBILE. Continued under former order. LARCENY Continued uncer former order, LARCENY Continued under forner order, LARCENY++ TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendant appeared and showe@ good behavior, Continuedy wp under former order, ULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Continued under former order, AL JURY Alias Capias, (ATTEMPT TO Com) if RAPE. Nol Prosed with leave. RAPE. The defendant through his counsel Buren Jurney waives bill and enters a plea of Prostitution and attempt to break jail which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. ON account of the mental weakness of the defendant, judge ment of the COURT IS THAT HE be confined to jail for a period of TWELVE MONTHS and assigned to work on the roads of I Gounty, and to be assigned also to work at the County Home upon request of the commissioners. After he has on the en at the County Home for a period of four months, the #@ missioners are authorized to hire him out on condition he is not permitted to live in Iredell County or Atwell ship, Kowan County. | ¥y yen he? OP CAPT. TC DAVIDSON. Owing to the death of one of the County's most beloved and dist ed citizens, in honor of and commemorating the on Saturday evening November 5, 1927, it is on motion of zeb V. Long and seconded by another m ember of the bar, that this Court. death of Capt. 7. M. C. Davidson. \ } } : i § 4 : ! z f ‘ f } i No. 29 State vs C C Sherrill IN THE SUPERIOR COURT . NOVEMBER TEKM 1927— Monday November 7, 1927. TRANSPORT POSSESS AND RECEIVE LIQUOR. The defendant comes into open Court and through his coun- sel Buren Jurney pleads not guilty. Afeer hearing the evide ence on both sides, judgment of the curt is that the de- fendant is guilty of transporting and possessing liquor. if appearing to the Court that the defendant has been in jail for two months and that he has erganic heart trouble, jud of the Court is that he be confined to jail for a perigdionths to work on public roads, on the count for Poss@ssion; capias to issue on the further order of the Court. On the count: for transporting, judement of the Court is that he be confined to jail for a period of six months to work on roads, sentence to take effect upon the bermination of the sentence on the count for possession; capias to issue on the further order of the court. CAKKY CONCEALED WEAPON. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty to carrying a concerzled waepon as charged in the warrant. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defend- ant pay a fine of .;75 and the cests of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Norning November 8th 1927 at 9330 A. M. PRE AND HOLDI OF THE 15th JUDICIAL D No. 9 State vs Herbert G Morrison No. 15 State vs Johnson Wilson Ben Teague NO..-27 State vs Ted Dishman No. 18 State revs Lester Brewer No. 183 State vs loy Mathis alias Coy Mathis No. 19 State vs James Anthony Noe 20 State vs Feildon NM 2rivett No. 23 \ State vs Bob Hursey No. 41 State vs Jack Mayhew ns /OURT ADJOUKNS IN HONOR Ow ed > citizens, on Saturday evening November 5, 1927, it is on motion of zeb V. Long a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 Monday Novembers 7, 1927, NON=-SUPPORT. Continued under former order. LARCENY OF AUTOMOBILE. Continued under former order. LARCENY Continued uncer former order, {{ LARCENY ) Continued under forner order, ) t LARCENY+#+ TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendant appeared and showe@ good behavior. Continuedy m under former order, ’ ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Continued under former order. PERJURY Alias Capias,. (¢(ATTEMPT TO COMVIT RAPE. 4 | Nol Prosed with leave. ] \ArE. The defendant through his counsel Buren Jurney waives bill and enters a plea of Prostitution and attempt to ‘break jail which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. ON account of the mental weakness of the defendant, judge I County, and to be assigned also to work at the County Home ommissioners. After he has on the f for a period of four months, the sqm zed to hire him out on condition that De ee DE A ta OB CAPT. Tu OC DaVIDSON. ing to the death of one of the County's most beloved and disti * that this Court i n honor of and Commemorating the death of Capt. T. M. C. Davidson. ment of the COURT IS THAT HE be confined to jail for a period of TWELVE MONTHS ana assigned to work on the roads of Iredell jive in Iredell County or Atwell Tow- \ \ No. 29 State vs C C Sherrill PC ee EO EO IN THE SUPERIOR COURT _ NOVEMBER TEKM 1927 Monday November 7, 1927. TRANSPORT POSSESS AND RECEIVE LIQUOR. The defendant comes into open Court and through his coun- sel Buren Jurney pleads not guilty. After hearing the evide ence on both sides, judgment of the ccurt is that the de- fendant is guilty of transporting and possessing liquor. iT appearing to the Court that the defendant has been in jail for two months and that he has erganic heart trouble, jud of the Court is that he be confined to 4811 for & perigdjtonths to work on public roads, on the count for pos soon: capias to issue on the further order of the Court. On the count; for transporting, judgement of the Court is that he be confined to jail for a period of six months to work on roads, sentence to take effect upon the bermination of the sentence on the count for possession; capias top issue on the further order of the court. CARRY CONCEALED WEAPON. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty to carrying a concealed waepon as charged in the warrant. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defend- ant pay a fine of {75 and the cests of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning November 8th 1927 at 9330 A. M. PRE OLL OF THE 15th JUDICIAL D IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927. Tuesday November 8, 1927, This Honorable Court convenes according to adjournment nucssae y Morning November 8, 1927 at 9:50 A. M. for the dispatch of business, No. 35 State vs W L Jones No. 8 State vs Sseaf Turner No 27 “tate vs Brady Clontz Calvin Clontz November 9, 1927, at 9:30 A. y i f 4 4 This EXCEEDING SPEED LIMIT. Continued for defendant. DISPOSING OF MORTGAGE PROPERTY, Nol Prosed with leave. Prosecuting witness W A L of this action. It is further orde C 1 dig ne red by the Court that the Si Fa be strick.- Smith to be taxed wit} the cost eregne neers LAKCENY AND RECEIVING. The defendantscomes into open Court and counsel Buren Jurney pleads not guilty. rons an Jury No 1 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict find the defendants 2 . ed in the bill of indiotmaak” a _— H ‘ Onorable Court take a recess tintildWgdnesday Morning ding an of the 15th Judigial District. \ \ IN (‘HE SWPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 Wednesday November 9, 1927. This Honorable Vourt convenes according to adjournment Wednesday Morn- ing November 9, 1927 at 9:50 A. M. for the dispatch of business. No. 27 state vs prady Clontz Calvin Clontz State \ No. 40 vs Brady Clontz No. 22 | State \ vs James Latiner \ No. 26 State vs Carl Penson Fannie Mitchell John Hager alias Frank Brown Clyde Lowery alias Jacob Helms. No. 25 State vs Carl “enson Fannie Mitchell John Hager alias Frank Brown Clyde Lowrey alias Jacob Helms No. 24 State vs Carl Benson Fannie Mitchell No. 39 State vs Carl Benson 9 { 4 ; i f ) § j V ) i ) ee ee ES ee ee ee ee STOREBREAKING LARCENY AND HKECEIVING. The defendant having been found guilty by jury No.1, Judgment of the Court is that these defendants be confined to the State Prison for a period of not less than TWO YEARS no more than FOUK YEARS ans assigned to hard labor, to wear stripes. BREAK JAIL The defendant comes into open Court and through his coun- sel Buren Jurney pleads guilty to breaking jail as charged in the bill on indictment. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined to jail and assigned to work on the roads of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS; capias to issue on the furth- er order of the Court. MANSLAUGHTER, Drive car under influence of liquor. The defendant comes into cpen Court and through his ccun- sel Frank Grier pleads guilty to manslaughter as charged in the bill of Indictment. ; On the count for manslaughter, judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined to jail for a period of TWO YEARS and assigned to work on the roads of Iredell County or at the County Home. On the count for driving car while under influence of liquor, judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- fined to jail for a period of SIX MONTHS, capias to issue on the further order of the Court. BARGENN. OFIAN AUTOMOBILE. . K#HsHEHENG . The defendants Carl Benson and Fannie Mitchell come into open Court and through their counsel J G Lewis and Hugh Mitchell plead guilty as charged in the bill of Indictment. Judgment of the Yourt is that the defendants Carl Benson and Fannie Mitchell be confined to the State Penitentiary for a period of not less than ONE YEAK nor more than THREE YEARS, the male defendant assigned to hard labor, to wear stripes. Alias capias as to other defendants. HOHSEBEEAKING LARCENY.AND RECEIVING. The defendants Carl Benson and Fannie Mitchell come into open Court and through their counsel 3 G Lewis and Hugh G Mitchell plead guilty as charged in the bill of indictment. Judgment of the Court is that the defendants Carl Benson and Fannie Mitchell be confined to the State Penitentiary for a period of not less than THREE nor more than FIVE YEARS; capias to issue on the subsequent order of the Court. : Alias Capias as to other defendants. ; CATION AND ADULTERY. Reha Aakandaabe come into open Court and thréugh their counsel #. G. Lewis and Hugh Mitchell plead guilty as charged in the bill of indictment. It ts ordered and adjudged by the Yourt that prayer for judgment be continued. ATTEMPT TO BREAK JAIL? The defendant comes sel J G Lewis enters 4 plea ail. = Seat ioacioe and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued ° into open Court and through his coun- to guilty of milicious injury feat ate nt te era eee <a rae nentialmnsaeninenncevenatene IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM, 1927 Wednesday November 9, 1927. No. 28 AFFRAY State Not a True Bill. vs W H Mayhew No. 32 TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR. State Nol Prosed with leave/ vs William Click No. 36 JAIL BREAKING otate Alias Capias. vs Clyde Hager No. 57 JAIL BREAKING State Alias Capias vs Cecil Mayhew No. 38 JAIL BREAKING “tate Alias Capias. vs John Hager No. 10 TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR otate Continued under former order. vs Levi Phillips No. 5 TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR. — Continued under former order. June M@Lean North Carolina 4 Iredell County 4} In the Supertor Yourt Novémber Term 1927, State of North Carolina vs JUDGMEN®., Will Tice and S A Asbury, Intervenor. THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard on appeal from the Recorders! Cour Ir : t of Iredell County to the Superior Court of said County, at the November T erm 1927, and being heard by His sonor, 1 B Finley, Judge Presiding, and by agre ; greement of the Solicitor and the counsel for the intervenor, the law and evid Ta m ence was heard by HIS Honor T B Finley, the right of jury trial having been wai ‘ . ved And after having heard all the evidence in the case His Honor T B Finle ; y ordered and adjudged that by the greater weight of the evidence the int } ervenor S A Asbury, was the owner of the car, and that the same was used in transporting liquor without his knowledge entitled to the Possession of same It i S therefore considered, ordered and adjudged, that S A Asbury be, and he is, h , » hereby declared to be the owner of said automobile and entitle to the immedi ate Possession, and said car is hereby ordered released to him T B Finley, Yudge Presid and consent, and that he oo IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 Wednesday, November 9 1927 NORTH CAROLINA) In the Superior Court ) IREDELL COUNTY) November Term 1927 I, Malcom Graeme Cameron, do solemnly swear that I will support the constitution of the United States; so help me God. Maicotm Cameron. Subscribed and sworn to before me in open court, this the 7th day of November 1927. T B Finley, Judge Presiding «& Holding Courts in 15th vudicial District. I, Malcolm Graeme Cameron, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of NORTH Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be es- tablished for the government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the constituiion of said State, not inconsistent with the constitution of the United States, to the best of my knowledge and ability; so help me, God. Malcolm Cameron. Subscribed and sworn to before me in open court. This 7th day of Nov 1927. : , -oo Finley. Judge Presiding « holding courts in 15th judicial distract I, Malcoifim Graeme Cameron, do swear that I will truly and honestly demean myself in the practice cf an attorney, according to the best of my knowledge and ability; so help me, God. Malcom Cameron Subscribed and sworn to before me in open court. This the 7th day of November 1927. T B Finley, Judge Presiding and holding Courts in 15th Yudicial District. NORTH CAROLINA: IRED:LL COUNTY: es Mr Malcolm Graeme Cameron having presented in open court a license signed by the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, dated August 22 1927 authorizing him to practice as an attorney and Counsellor of law in the Courts of this State, and he having taken and subscribed to the oaths required of Attorneys at law in this § : ‘ coer is ordered and adjudged that the said Malcoim Graeme Cameron be, and he is admitted to the practice of the profession of Attorney and Counsellor at law in all courts of this State. It is furt er ordered and adjudged by this court thet a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread upon the minutes of this Court of November 1927. , of this States Sis We Te tT B Finley, -Judge Presiding. ST a nee eee ee 9 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT 332 NOVEMBER TERM 19237 Wednesday, Nov 9th 1927 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County November Term B 4+ Scronce, W D Turner, Vinton ‘ Liddell Pickens and RK S Pickens, on behalf of themselves, and all other stockholders and creditors who may come in and make themselves parties plaintiff in this action. vs Link-Pickens Publishing Company, a Corpo- ration. RECEIVER'S KE? ORT ee ee es ewe Report: Amount received to date from sale of stock, collection of stock subscriptions and upon open accounts. $9,567.36 Amount paid out to date as of preferred claims AanG @Xpenses Of KROCOLVErSHALY < .s6c%s eke déeoikc cca 110 76.01 A Balance now on hand and deposited to the credit of Robt. A Collier, Keceiver, in the reoples loan & Savings Bank, Statesville, N.C. $1,894.55 This the 7th day of November 127. Robert A Collier, Receiver, Filed 11/7/27/ C G Smith, Dept csc. NORTH CAROLINA in the Superior Court IKEDELL COUNTY “ovember ‘erm 1927, Judge T B Finley, Presiding. We, the Grand-Jury for ovember Term of Ieedell County Superior Court, 1927, beg leave to make the following report# We have passed on ali bills sent to us and made return to Court. We visited all the offices in the Courthouse and find them all in good condition. The latest methods of bookkeeping are usec, and we find the books in a neat and well kept condition, We visitec the County Home and found the following inmates: 14 White females, 10 white males, 7 colored females, and 10 colored males. There are two white females and one colored female blind. ‘The stock consists of four miles, thirty-five hogs, and twelve cows. There are two convicts for work on the farm, they now have fifty-two acres sowed in whéat. This farm is self-sustaining and some to spare in regard to r, grains and feed. we find the inmates all well cared for and satisfiede We recommend that MRS Pearry be given one colored helper, We vi visited the fail and found the following prisoners: 3 colored mal - ales, 7 white males, and ] white female, They are clean and well treated. Yhe building is also in good conéithon [ preset? County IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 Wednesday “ov 9 1927 We visited the Chain Gang and found the following: 16 prisoners, seven white and nine colored. The equipment consists of fifteen mules, one road machine, one truck and seven wagons. All equipment 48 in good condi- tion. There are three guards, one truck-driver, and one helper. We find the stock in good condition and well ceref for. We recommend an extra fly for the prisoner's slppping quarters. C H Knox. Foreman of Grand Jury. North Carolina In the Superior Court November ‘'erm 1927 Ng Cc Brookshire vs ) Judgment McGueen Foures ) This cause coming on to be heard at this term d the court, and being heard before his HOnor, T B Finley, Yudge presiding, and it appearing to the court that this action was instituted by the paaintiff to recover for certain alleged labor and materials furnished the defendant in the construc- tion of a house in the City of Charlotte, N. Ce, ana to ‘ave the same declared a lien upon the premises; and it further appearing that the defendant an- swered and-set up a counter-claim against the plaintiff for alleged breach of contract; and it further appearing that the plaintiff desires to take a non-suit as to his causecofcactiion, and the defendant desires to take a non~« wuit as to his counter -claim. It is therefore, considerec, ordered ana adjudged by the court that the plaintiff's cause of action be non-suited and the defendant's counter- claim against the plaintiff be non-suitec, and that said action and counter- claim be and the same are hereby dismissed. It is further considered and adjudged that each party pay his own cost to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. T B Finley, Yudge Presiding. By Conssent. Grier & Grier, Attys for plaintiff Jake F Newell, Attorney for Defendant. sett jourt NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Cou 7 IREDELL COUNTY November Term 192 Mary E Ywens ) . Vs ) Issues Van Owens ) Question 1: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the bringing of this nese? Answer, YeSe Wiibitente ne eee ee ieee 334 IN THE BUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 Wednesday ‘ov 9 1927, Question 2: Were the plaintiff Mary E Owens and the defendant Van Owens, married as alledged in the complaint? Answer: Yese Question 5. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for more than five years as alledged in the compaaint? Answer, Yese NORTH CAROLINA : in the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY :; November Term 1927, Mary E Owens VS Judgment. This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, TB Finley, Yudge, and Jury, and being heard, and the jury having answered all the issues submittec to it in favor of the plaintiff; It is therefore, considere d, ordered and adjudged that marriage now existing between the plaintiff Mary E Owens and the defendant Van Owens be and the same is disso vec, and that the parties hrerto are divorced from the bonds of matrimony. Let the cost be taxes against the plaintiff, This ‘ov 9 1927, ’ B Finley, Judge ‘residing. > Al INA 1 \ In the Superior Court nD LL COUNTY “ovember. Term 1927, Any Stephenson, “ndividually, and “ohn ' Gillespie, Next Friend of Clarence § } e S-ockton JUDGME JDGMENT Vs Kincaid Veneer Company, a Cor- poration. . This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned udge of' the Sup x ie gE 16 superior Court and it appearing to the Vout that the things and mate ters at issu , , m @ and in Controversy between the parties have been duly settled by an agreement wher r Pand reby the defendant consents that judgment may be rendered against it in the sum of ¢$ Be a aes of $84.75, and the plaintiry hes agreed to accept said judgment in full settleme : r ent of any and all claims of every nature and character which he may have against ‘er the defendant by reason of the things and matters alleged in the complaint, > » *t further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in this action is & minor and that said action was brought for the purpose of by the plaintiff on account of personal injuri juries received @S @ result of negligence on the part of the de- fendant, the Court has investigated injury was received; and ° the > &NC ppon said investigation, finds, as a fact, that e ’ ’ ON THE SUPERIOR COURT 335 NOVEMBER ‘ERM 1927 AD Wednesday, ‘November 9th 197 settlement above mentioned is for the best interest of said minor and hereby approves the same. Now, therefore, it is hereby considered, ordered anc adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $84.75., together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Cierk. This 9th day of “ovember 1927 . T B Finley, Yudge “residing. By Consent: Robert A Collier, Atty for rlaintiff John A Scott, Atty for Defendant. seoeee “eee N&R TH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY J A Clanton ) vs ) Carrie Clanton ) 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermar allegea in the compalaint? Answer: YeSe as allegec in the complaint? 2. Did the defendant com it adultery Answer: Yese Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of 5. North Carolina for more than two years ext preceed ng the commencement of this action as alleged in the compaaint? Answer, Y€Se NOTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY November Term 1927 J A Clanton ) vs ) JUDGMENT Carrie Clanton) This cause coming on to be heard before “is for its verdict having answered Honor, T B Finley, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the marriage between the plaintiff, J A Clanton, and the defendant, Carrie Clanton, be and the same is hereby dissolved, and they are hereby divorced from the bonds of matrimony. Let the costs be taxes against the plaintiff. { B Finley, Yudge Presiding. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning November 14, 1927 at 10:00 o'clock A. M. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT ._ NOVEMBER TERM 1927 SECOND WEEK. N THE su ) UR’ Monday November 14, ,1927. ' SECOND WEEK ee NOVEMBER TERM, 1927, Monday November 14, 1927. North Carolina In the Superior Court Second week , North Carolina, { Iredell County. November Term 1927, Iredell County. )f§ November Term 1927, In the Superior Court, tHis Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 O'clock $ Brown W ° hoo; Monday Morning November 14, 1927 when and where His Honor T B Finley Judge vs > Presiding and Holding Courts of the 15th Judicial District of North Carolina, is robert S Brown et al 0 present and presiding, this the second week of “November Term, 1927, i A 3 t. Was the land described in the complaint divided by consent by the M P Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, - 904 as alleged in the complaint? rettrned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve — oe . A $ CSe as Jurors of this Court for second week, to-wit: J M Morrieon, Waleér Ross JF we , . ~ 4 Winters, k C M 6 mw) 2nd. Did the said tenants in common take possession of the potion Winters, k C Morrison, Clyde S Alexander, L H White, J M Cash, Espy N Collins end, D1 Cloer, J C Overcash, W B Good ] ; alloted to each as alleged in the complaint? vecers « G Overcash, WB Gooding, D L Collie, I G Alexander, C E Barger , Avery C Elam,and A A Cartner. Answer; Yes. : ss, ; Be de Loc F le qT f l Srd. Is the plaintiff W S Brown the sole owner and séized in fee simp The following were excused for lawful causes; hk T McGee, K 1, Shoemaker r ’ - Blankenship on the lands described in the complaint. £ 1K eNnSNip.e r -ollow W Answer: Yes. ‘ne following was returned as "Not to be found in Iredell County"; hk S Henderson FORGERY. er The defendant through his comnsel : T Cansler, k. Lee Wright and Grier @ Grier comes into open Court and pleads ak wake to forgery as charged in the Bill of Indictment. The following Jurors were drawn,*ssworn and empannelled for their verdict: J M Morrison, Walter koss, J Ff Winters, RK C Morrison, L H White, J M Cash, Espy N Collins, kK ™ Cloer, J CG Overcash, W B Goodin, D L Collie and I G Alexander. No. 14 State vs North Carolina ; } : +inG, In the Superior Court, Frank R Brown. Iredell County ounty, November Term 1927. } } y » ' ( j i T Ostwalt vs JUDGMEN - Bessie J Lackey. this cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His E Honor ,T.B. Llev 5 so eBeFinley, Judge Presidng; and it appearing to the Court that the parties there nh 5 oS ereto have settled their differences, and that the plaintiff, through his coun se a da n « » Adams Collier, having signified his desire to take a voluntary non-suit, it is therefore ordered by the Court that the plaintiff be, and he is, hereby allowed to take a voluntary non-suit in this action It is further ordered amax b y the Court that t the ; : ee cape ad He. this Honorable Gourt takes a recess until Tuesday Morning November 15, 1927 at @:30 A. M. 7 Py Finley ' rea, “es re ae | Ja@dge Presiding ana Holding 0 8 of the 15th Judicial Distpfct. cost of this action. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927. NOVEMBER TERM 1927 This Honorable court convenes according to adjournment at 9:30 a Continued from page 538 In CountyNol, judgment of the Court is that the defend- ant be confined to jail of Rowan County for a period of TWO YEARS and assigned to work on public roads of Rowan County, this sentence to take effect upon the termination of the sentence in No. 14; capia: to issue on the further order of the court. In Count No. 12, judgment of the Court is that the de- No 11 continued. State vs Frank K Brown A. M. Wednesday Morning November 16, 1927, for the dispatch of business, No. 1 State ws ({ TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued under former order, of BWO YEARS and assigned to work on the roads of Rowan County, the sentence to take effect upon the termination of the sentence in Count No 1, capias to issue on the No. 16 LA.CENY State vs Jack Byers No. 21 State vs Glenn Asbury No. SO State vs Grady Shoemanker No. 54 State vs William Woodson No. 14 State vs Frank Rk. No. ll State vs Krank R. Brown Se Ee ee SS ee A Se A PE ee 2 COntinued under former order. ASSAULT WITH DHADLY WEAPON. Nol Prosed with leave. DhUNE AND POSSESS LIQUOR. Defendant called and failed. Nol Prosed with keave ‘ANUPACTURE HOME BREV., The defendant comes into open Court and through his coun- sel J G Lewis pleeds guilty to Manufacturing home brew as charged in the bill of Indictment. _ it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued until January Term 1928. FORGERY The defendant through his counsel, Messrs. Cansler, Wright and Grier, tenders the state a plea of nolo contendere to the charge in the bill of indictment, which plea the State accepts. Pr . Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be con- ned to the State Penitentiary for a period of not less than 8BVEN nor more than TEN YEARS, and that he be assign- ed to hard labor and to wear stripes. we the defendant's giving a bond in the sum of $10 ,000 Onditioned upon his making his appearance at the State Pen- 5 ays from this date, the execution of this sentence is to commence in 30 days from this date, or from the date of the def endant's su y. en or Sheriff, as above stated. surrender to the Ward EMBEZZLEVENT. 4n count No 1 of the bill the defendant through his coun- and “rier, tenders the State 4 attempt to commit a felony, 8 ent which plea is accepted by: defendant through his counse to cour In Coun a plea of = t to cémmit a felony as cahrged cepted by the State. Count No. nsel tenders a plea on nolo commit a felony asccharged in Sirens es ted by the State. Count No 15 +o on ane § counsel tenders a plea of Nolo 4 ompt to comilit a felony as charged im Piea is acce'ted by the State, (Continued to next page.) Judgment Nisi Sci Fa anda Capias, \ \ \ No. 12 State vs Frank kK. Brown No. 13 State \ vs a RK. Brown North Carolina Iredell County. State vs Frank KR. Brown In further order of the Count. In Counts No 13 and 14 and 15, prayer for judgment continued. ) { j § John Ritchie { fendanttbe confined to jail of Kowan County for a period 4 0 § i { § (j Nol Prosed with leave as to all other counts. FORGERY Nol Prosed with leave. FORGERY Nol Prosed with leave. In the Superior Court November Term 1927. f (f this case it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that B M Morrow, who was placed in charge of the jury by the Court, be allowed the sum of $15.00 and mileage as allowed by law for such services, same to be taxed as part of the cost in this cause. North Carolina, Iredell County. Eva May Powell vs &mith Powell T B Finley Judge Presiding In the Superior Court November Term 1927. 4 i ISSUES i 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more tham two years next predeeding the commencement of this action 88 alleged in the complaint? Answers Yes “ A St ERE a TG ea RN Ea RR SE eee on IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM1927 " In the Superior ¢ rt, a tt. (4 o~ " tei EE 1927¢ North Carplina, Iredell County. iva May Powell vs Smith Powell this cause cothing on to be heard before His Honor, T B Finley, YJuage Presiding, and a jury, and the jury tor its verdict having answered the issues submitted to it in f'avor of the plaintiff as set out in the res condidered, ordered and adjudged by the Court e plaintiff, Kva May rowell, and the defendant, nereby dissolved, and they are hereby div- ony. Let the costs be taxed against the plains Finley Judge Presiding, In the Superior Court, November term 1.27, and defendant intermarry as allaged in the aefenda - abs n 7 13 @ndant abandon and live seperate and appart from plain- tiff without laf vVLoNC any a Y Ts eo : y Cofault on plaintirrts part, for more than five consecutive years next preceed 1e mn I ing the comnencment of this action, as alledged in the com- plaint? ANSWEP Yes. Se lias the plz "1 - : Plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for m ‘s ore than five consecutive years immediately next preceeding the commencen ommencement of this action, as alleged in the complatnt? Answer; Yes, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 Nort Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Nevember Term, 1927 Carrie Feimster vs Mack Feimster 4 This cause coming on to be heard before liis Honor, T. B. Finley, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury for their verdict hav- ing answered the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record: and adjudged by the ” It is therefore, considered, ordered Gourt that the marriage between the plaintiff, Carrie Feimster, and the defendant, hack Feimster, be and the same is hereby uissolded, and they are hereby divorced from the bonds matrimony et the costs be taxed against the plaintiff. Finley ie Je ge Presiding. North Carolina in the Superior Court Iredell County Lacy Craig Vs 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for two years immediately next preceeding the com- mencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. See St North Carolina Iredell County eT mE ge ME Sr Herp Ae 342 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County November Term 1927 Lacy Craig VS JUDGMENT C Clyde Craig This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T B Finley, vudge Presidinr, and Jury, and the jury for their verdict having an- swered the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record; ae As therefore, considere » Ordered and adjudged, that the rriace between the plainti? ’, Lacy Craig, and the defendant, Clyde nereby dissolved, and t ey are hereby atrimony. Let the cost be taxed arainst T BR Finley, Judge ‘res iding. In the Superior Court November Term 1927 nobert ; srown, Krg ! 4 Combust and nus band —— “ us » A Blackwelder and wite Mrs ¢ blackwelder, John L Blackwelde nad wife Mrs John L Blackwe ] rs r’ Black de irs Laura ennett and husband Bennett, Mrs Fannie wR IG r¢ As Mmiehay . j hy {3 $y ; wey Gordoma husband nn Gr@daoma, E ee oe be wae oa > rawley & wife Kai rawley. Oh ) ) ) ) JULGMENT; ) ) ) ) ) This cause ing on to be heard at this term before Hie “onor, I B Finley “udge Presiding. and o tun. : Vv; Ge Presiding, and a jury, and being heard, and it appear~ ang that BW Braewlew ena «ten: Bias: rawley and wife Kate P Brawley had signed a quit-claim leed 5 } y z > Geed to the plaintiff prior to the trial of this action: and 4& further appearing that the defendants Robert & Brown, Mrs M A Combust and husband Combust, C A Blackwelder and wife Mrs CA Blackwelder, John L Blackwelder and wife Mrs John L Blackwelder, D RP Blackwelder and wife mrs 4 B 2 ? > . 3 ny ce nd husband Bennett, Mr 8 \ *S F lackwe ld: I Mrs Laura Be e a Fe " BG Sande Gordoma and husband John Gordoma, are non-residents of the State of y er: : North Carolina, and that Summons was served on the said non-residents by publication. and the Jury having answered the issues as follows: IN THE SUPERIOK COURT NOVEMBER TERM 192'7 "First: Nas the land described in the complaint dividec by consent by the tenants in common in 1904 as alleged in complaint? Answer Yese ‘ ; Second: Did the said tenants in common take possession of the portion allo ted each as alleged in the complaint? Ansver? Yes, Third; 1s the plaintiff WS Brown the sole owner and seized in fee simple of the lands described in the complaint? Answer: Yes," It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the action ss to E W Brawley snd wife Kate P Brawley be and the same is hereby non-suited,. It is further orderec and adjudged that the partition and division made in 1904 by the tenants in common by consent at that time be and the same is hereby confirmed and adjudge: inding among the said tenants in common their heirs and assi It is further ordered a ad ths the s.id W 8S Brown is the ‘ . ann JA ~ ys jad sole owner snd seized in fe nad described in the complaint as follows: fowit: Becinning at a stone; thence north 2 east 88 poles to a stone; t} se Ne 75 W 64 poles to a stone; thence N W ne W - al: he 88 “ 34 poles to a stone; thenc: hite Oa’; thence S 88 E 12 poles to a stone; t! stone; thence North , 0 [A na : a cans hanna 3&8 Oo W 86 poles to a stone; thence S 40 E 64 poles to a stone: thence S 2 W 9 poles to a stone; thence S 40 » nce N 87 E 127 1 n containing cres more or less poles to the berinning corner, containin acres more or less, It is further ordered and adjudged that the cost of this action be taxed arainst the defendants by the Clerl ’ this Court. Finley, Yudge Presiding. North Carolina the Superior Court fredell County November Term 1927 Tri-State Transportation Company ) vs ) etearns Brothers, incorporated, ) Globe 4tndemnity Company This cauise coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, I B Finley, Judge Presiding, and being heard upon the report of the arbitrators, and it appearing to the Court that the arbitrators heretofore selected by the parties have awareded the plaintiff judgment , 2n he sum of against Stearns Brothers, Inc., and Globe “ndemnity Co for the 1 $3,338.17, with interest thereon from November 24 1924, and that said award hwas to be a rule of court and judgment entered in accordance therewith. IN THE SUPERTOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM1927 It is now, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, Stearns Brothers, Incorporated, and Globe Indemnity Company, the sum of $5,558.17, with interest thereon from November 24 1924 until paid . It is further considered and ad judged by the Court that ‘on Stahle Linn, Chairman of the Board of Arbitrators selected by the parties, be and he is hereby allowed the sum of $225.00 for his services as chairman and as member of said board; that Major Lyerly, also a rember of said board, be and he is allowed $150.00 for his services and $25.00 for expenses making a total of $175.00, and that J B hoach, local member of said board, be allowed $150. for his services, It is further considered and adjudged that the above compensation allowed the members of the Board of Arbitrators and the Stenographer's of $751.52 in taking the evidence and furnishing copies thereof to the arbitr and to the attorneys for the plaintiff and defendants, and one half by the d-fendants. and adjudged that the defendants pay the action to be taxed by the Clerk of this t B Finley. Judge Presiding. The plaintiff objects and except to the portion of the judgment ; the compensation of the arbitrators and the stenographer between the plaintiff and defendante. c me piaantitY and defendants, Stearns Brothers, inc, and Globe Indemnity vompany, to the signing of the judgment including said portion, an appeai to the Supreme Court. Notice of appeal given in open Court, further notice waived; The pleintiff given sixty days to serve case and defendants given sixty days thereafter to serve counter n exceptions. Appeal bond ina the sum of $50.00 deemed sufficient. T B Finley. 0 OY North Carolina +n the Superior Court Iredell c N ec County November Taxm 16 1927 Jesse ™ Brown et al ) Stockholders, and creditors ) Brown Bag Company ) Report; Amount received to date from sale of stock of goods collection of open ACCOUNTS. veccccccscccccchlSORel? Amount paid out to date for expenses of Receivership..... 176.02 Balence on hand and de Position to the credit of Dearman, Receiver, in the Commercial National ak, Statesville, N, Oi 000% beskeccue 1126.75 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT SES” Ss NOVEMBER TERM 1927 The Stock of goods, machinery, fixtures, etc., of the Brown Bag Company were offered for sale on September 28 1927 after advertisement ac- cording to law, said sale to be subject to the confirmation of the re- ceiver and Court . T he highest bid received at said sale was twentyone per cent of inventoried price or $905.89. After investigation it does not appear to the Receiver that the said bid represents a fair value of the stock, machinery, fixtures, etc. offered for sale. and it is therefore recommended that said sale be not confirmed, It is further recommended that the keceiver be permitted to sell the stock of goods, machinery, fixtures, etc. of the Brown Bag Company privately, as it appears to the Receiver after due investigation that a more advantageous price can be realized. This Nov 16 1927, C H Dearman, Keceiver Brown Bag Company. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell cCounthy November 16 1927 Jesse M Brown et al ) Stockholders and creditors vs ) Brown Bag Company ) Upon the foregoing keport of C H Dearman, heceiver of the Brown Bag Company, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the sale of the z Y stock of goods, machinery, fixtures, etc. of the Brown Bag Company, held on September 28 1927 be not confirmed. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Receivor be empowered to sell the stock of goods, machinery, fixtures, etc., of the Brown Bag Company privately. T B Finley, Judge Presiding. SLSR SS APELL North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Mrs Mattie E Fraley, John B Fraley, and wife Mrs John B Fraley, C E Fraley & wife Mrs C E Fraley, Paul W Alridge and wife lirs Paul Fraley Alridge, ugh C Moore & wife Mrs Hugh Fraley Moore, “iss Violet Fraley, and Mattie Bell Fraley, Elizabeth Fraley and Reuben Fraley by their next friend, Mrs Mattie E Fraley and W L Tillery and wife Margaret Tomlin Tillery, Ex Parte. J UDGYENT ; ee ee ee ee ee ee This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, at this term of the Super@or Court of Iredell County before His HONOR T B Finley& it appearing to the Court that owing to the mistake, ignorance and inadver-~ tence of the late J B Fraley the deed executed by the said J B Fraley and wife Mattie E Fraley to John B Fraley on August 17th 1925, is incorrect d B ale convey the tract or lot of land sold the said Yohn Fraley; and does not and it further appearing that the true voundary of the tract or lot OF a Se 3 Hf @ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT a a ae 4 7 SHE NQ@ EMBER TERM 1927 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 19277 d sold and attempted to be conveyed to the said John B Fraley by t lan ¢ y the And said Commissioner is further authorized, directed and em- B Fraley and wife Mattie E Fraley, is as follows: oe = . : powered to execute and deliver to W L Tillery and wife Margaret Tomlin Beginning at a stake, F B Holland's Northeast corner on the West Tillery, a deed conveying to them that certain tract or lot of land si- sid ’ Park Street in the City of Statesville, N. C.. and running the side of Par . . nee tuated on the West side of Park Street in the City of Statesville, N. C., oti enmestaeesnceten ee with Park Street North 394 west 50 feet to an iron stake; thence south bounded as follows: 50 we 2° feet and 4 inches to an iron stake in Mrs Merrill's jine: 50 west 1 ? Beginning at a stake on the West side of Park Street in the ~ ' hence south 40 east 50 feet to an iron stake, F B Holland's corner: . : : City of Statesville, John Fraley's northeast corner on said Street; and + ' . in Mrs herrill's line; thence with Holland's line North 50 €ast 120 fee . 5 rae ’ running south 50 degrees west 122-4/10 feet to a :stake in Mrs Werrill's t« he beginning on Park Street. i, | : line; thence north 42 degrees west 50 feet to a sta e, Mrs Merrill's And it further appearing that the true boundary of the tract or ’ j f line; thence north 50 degrees east 125 feet to a stake on the west side ot of lana sold and attempted to be conveyed to the said W L Tillery oe sah tile of Park Street; thence south 393 derrees east with Park Street 50 feet wife, Margaret Tomlin ‘Tillery, by the said J B Fraley and wife, Mattie E ’ “ : _ <—e ° . to the beginning. This l6th day of Nov 1927. Fraley ia as follow $ Fraley 48 aé olloy s 7 B Finley, “udre rresiding and holding ee a ee on — —_ Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District tatesviile, John Fraley's Northeast corner on said Street, and running of North Caroline. south 50 degrees west 122-4/10 feet to a std e in Mrs Merrill's line; north 42 derrees west 50 feet to a ste ke,“is Merrill's line; thence North 50 derrees east 125 feet to a st ke on the west side of Park Street; thence south 59+ derrees east with Park Street 50 feet tm the beri ining. And it further appearing that all of the devisees and legatees of the said J B Fraley, deceased, are anxious and willing to correct said said Jon B Fraley and W L Tillery and wife Margaret ery, will be seized of a good anda indefeasible title in fee sola to each of them by the said J B Fraley and wife, «ttle and it further appe ring that three of the parties are minors and are represented in this proceeding by their mother and next friend, Mrs Mattie E rraley, who is slso anxious and willing to correct the errors in said deeds, It, is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that Mrs Jiattie E Fraley be and she is nereby apvointed commissioner by this Court and is authorized, directed and empowered to execute and deliver to John B Fraley a deed conveying to him that certain tract or lot of land situated on the West side of Park Street in the City of Statesville, ™. C. bounded as follows; Beginning at a stale, F B Holland's northeast corner on the west side of Park Street in the City of Statesville, N. C., and running thence with Park Street “orth 394 west 50 feet to an iron stake: thence south 50 West 122 feet and 4 inches to an iron stake in Mrs Merrill's line; thence south 40 East 50 feet to an iron stake, F B Holaand's corner. iin see ginning on Park Street. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT NOVEMBER TERM 1927 NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY Before the Clerk st Central Glass Co of Virginia Vs W B York and Fred W York, Trading as W B York & son This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by J A Hartness, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons was served on W B York and a copy of the summons left with W B York, together with a copy of the complaint in this action, and that no answer has been filed, and that the complaint in this case was duly verified: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged on motion of J ¥ hendren, Attorney for the plaintiff, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, W B Work, the sum of $255.50, with interest on the same at the rate of six per cent from M arch lst, 1926 until paid, together with the cost of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This Nov 7 1927. J A Hartness, Clerk Superior Court State of North Carolina County of Iredell “ & Brown ) VS ) % L Shuford) This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of iredell County, North Carolina, upon the record and pleading and other evidence offered by the Plaintiff and it appearing therefrom that the defendant was duly served with summons and acopy of the complaint filed in this cause in person on October 1 1927, and that said defendant has filed no demur or ansver to the compiaint and that the time for filing pleadings has elapsed and it further appearing that the com- plaint is duly verified and sets forth a cause of action based upon a note, agreeing to pay the plaintiff an absolute sum of money fixed by the terms 0! said note, said cause of action being for the failure to pay the bal- ance due of $4,000.00 on a $4,500.00 note, bearing date of the lst day of November, 1920, which note is past due, together with interest on $4,000. of said note since November 1 1926 amounting to $250.00. And it further appearing to the Court that at the time of the ex- ecution of the note aforesaid, the defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff a mortgage deed on certain lands situated in Iredell County and fully described in the complaint, in payment of the aforesaid indebted- ness which was a part of the purchase price of the lands therein described, . It is therefore considered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintire recover of the defendant the sum of $4000.00, together with interest on $4000.00 from November 1 1926 until paid and that it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that this judgment be and it is hereby declared a specific lien upon the lands described in the complaint in thig cause, which lands are describec as follows: to-wit: Beginning at the bend of the ditch 8 poles from the creek, Braw- ley's and Shuford's corner; thence North 21 degrees West 94 poles to a bridge; thence North 8 poles to another dith; thence North with that diteh 42 poles and North 15 degrees west 56 poles and North 34 degrees west 40 poles to the North side of an old road, Hidson's corner; thence North 65 decrees west passing by his Sycamore corner, 148 poles to a stone in Pat- terson's correr; thence south 74 degrees east 6 poles to a stone; thence south 4 grees east 68 poles to a stake, Patterson's corner; thence ditch; thence down the same 30 derrees Patterson's corner; thence with branch South to a Maple Tree; thence South 47 degrees east thence south 71 degrees east 21 poles to the be- acres, more or less, containins all the land des- Bost to N & Brown, excepting 28 acres, more or Said mortgage deed from the defendant to the in the office of the Register of Deeds for Ire- Mortgage book 54, at page 12, reference and which is asked to be made a part of this com- if actually copied herein, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that C B inberry be, and he is hereby appointed a commissioner of this Court and as such is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to advertise the aforessid lands for sale at public auction at the Courthouse door of Ire- deiil County, on the 19th day of December 1927, after advertising the same as is required by law and out of the money arising from the sale of said lands, or any resale of the same that may be directed by the Court, the- said Commissioner will pay off and discharge the cost of said sale and pay over the surplus, if any, to the Clerk of the Superior Court, to be applied upon the rt i h pon the judgment in this report his proceedine 6& shia Gal for further orders. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that bhe plaintiff, NE Br bh os Brown, if he so desires, may be and is hereby authorized to bid upon said lands at any public sale that may be had thereof ik ’ } ; I s further ordered and adjudved that the plaintiff recover the cost of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of This Court. This the first hionday of November 1927 & being Nov 7 1927. J A Hartness, Clerk Superior Court Iredell County, N. C. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Wallace Brothers Company, a Corporation, VS GMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL Charles R Goodman and WW Lentz This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court on hionday, November 14th, 1927, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was personally served upon the defendants on October lst and October 5th 1927, together with a verified copy of the plaintiff's complaint, and that more tnan thirty days have elapsed since the serving of said summons and complaint on the nts have failec to appear and file any defendants and that the defende : hanian tava of fac jeterminatioy he answer or demurer, raising an issu of fact aetermination of the eury; And it appearing to the action is based uj A Tl nature ths promissory note and that t! lature t can be readily ascertaine< It is, therefore, na adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants tne sum of $326.62, with interest : : ‘ or ee scether with the costs of thereon at 6% from Aug 26th 1927, until paid, together with the this action to be taxed by the Clerk of tnis Court. A Hartness 7 oJ ROO EEE North C._rolina . In the Superior Court Iredell County Wallace Brothers Company, a Corporation DEFAULT AND INQUIRY VS W R Haynes This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Vlerk of the Superior Court, on Monday, “ov 14th 1927, and being heard, and it ap- pearing to the Court that summons in this action was personally served upon the defendant on the lst day of October 1927, together with a veri- fied copy of the plaintiff's complaint, and that more than thirty days mons and complaint on the de- have elapsed since the serving of said sum fendant and that the defend nt has failec to appear ana file any answer or ssue of fact for the determination of the Jurys, demurer, raising an i And it appearing to the Court that this action is based upon an open account for goods sold and delivered; It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the plain. tiff have judgment by default and inquiry against the defendant anda that this cause be transferred to the civil issue docket of the Superior Court of Iredell County and that an inquiry be submitted to the jury for the determination of the amount of said recovery at the next term of the Sy. perior Court of Iredell County. J A Hartness, Clerk Superior Court, North Carolina In the Superior Court tredell County Before the Clerk ’'s lra Plaintiff JUDGMENT Defendant coming on to be heard before the Clerk, and it a pearing intiff and the defendant have compromised and and that the defendant has paid the plaintiff the treed upon. Jlaintiff having come into court before the Clerk and re- to take a voluntary none-suit. fore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plain- hereby non-suited, and that the said plaintiff be taxed cost of this action. This Nov 23 1927, J A hartness, Clerk Superior Court. WH < ay North Carolina, the Super Tredell County. November Jules Alprecht, et al vs Albrecht-Bristol Shoe Corporation Whereas it parties to this action have adjusted ing between them, the plaintiff i: Let the cost be taxed against ti This the 23rd day of n By Consents: & Purner & Turner tlover @r. Attorwneys for plaintiff irolina. County, Alexander, vs mer, Defendant This cause Con Clerk of the Superior artness pearing to the court that controy and ha jiefendant hé controversy, and that defend ereine ‘ Od a) It is therefore by consent ordered, ended. The defendant herein bo pay m4 ne >} cause of action herein be terminated the cost of this court as taxed. 7 » Kw L927. This Monday December op +v@ By consent of; Grier & Grier sand Wilson Wariick Attorneys ror plaintiff C A Jonas and John C Stroupe Attorneys for defendant nr Ww Ww rt, he defendant, ifferences exist- voluntary non-suit. before Hon. d@ North Carolina, on atesville, and it a ave adjusted th tlement v ith plain adjudged and decreed that the J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Vourt Gapiee: seaebae se eae ae aes) test SeSbsbse dtseatb at pede st A ve eir tiff Sa ee ee North Carolina, Iredell Cou: In the Superior Court ty. Before the Clerk. P Alexander, heard and being heard before Hon. Ja Iredell County, North Carolina, on in the City of Statesville, and it ap- iifference herein have adjusted their satisfactory settlement with plaintiff iered, adjudred and decre-d ti} ded. The defendant herein to pay + t ‘ * 4 J. A. Hartness Clerk Suveérior Court Superior Court, e Clerk. ason E Brown, srown and C This cause + os CAUSES be heard and being heard on the 8th day of Octob 927, 1 he er 1927, by the in J Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Couty; And it appearing té@ the Court that the summons in the action ® was iss i 1e 31s es ‘ ued on the Slst day of August 1927, and returnable to said court not c late® than thirty days from date of service of said summons; nm ; And it further appearing to the court that a summons and a verte fied oh La i vo copy of the complaint filed in the action was served on each of the ab mamed def'e : 1 - : efendants on the Sth day of September, 1927, by reading to each oF the Gefendants t 1 , nts the summons and a copy of theo complaint £1164 in the aoeieeele leaving with e per OF Onl0 @efandnts a copy of said summons and a verifi copy of the vomplaint; ‘ ” +} And it further appearing to the court t g. Brown as principal and the defendants, A G Brown, as sureties or endorsers, are indebted to the plainti prust Company, in the sum of ‘wo Thousand thereon &t 6% from the 22nd day of Febraary 192 It is therefore considered, ordered the said plaintiff recover of the lars, and for the cost in this action to GC This the bt! Trading Cor This cause coming 0: the superior Cours of Iredell 1927. and it ap earing to the , sued on the 2nd day of Wovembe day of fovember, 1927, torgetner wit! the plaintiff's cause of acti & answer has been filed in said service thereof; ana It is therefore, consid red, ordered have judgement against the defemdant for want of an fore, adjudged that judgment by default ane er next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, placed upon the trial docket of said court. This the 5th day of December, 1927-6 J. (<2,000.00) with interest thereon from th nd at the defendant, Mas Brown and C H Brown ff, Troutman Banking and ,o0O.00) with interess paid; djudged by the court that sum of Two Thousand Dol- day of February 1/27, urt. ecember, that the plaintiff answer, and it is, there- the to be executed at th Cc. That the cause be IN Ve A. Hartness Clebk Superior Court North Garolina, 4 Iredell County. } Barger. Lumber Compapy. vs Goodman Lumber In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, JUDGMENT coming on to be heard before J A Hartness, Clerk of th County and being heard and it appearing that all matters have been séttled. IT IS THEREFORE, on motion of 7 V Turlington ’ therefo ordered and adjudged that this action be and the he cost taxed against the plaintiff, 5 8g 2c Amt a 309 OL a embder + 192 le A. Hartness de Clerk Stperior Court In the Superior Court Before the Clerk he plaintiff come into Geurt and take a voluntary re orcerec and adjudsed by the Court that the plain- herepy non-suited, and are taxed with the cost of this “Oth dav of ecember, 1927, J. A. Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. Before the Clerk. Farmers Warehouse and Oil Mills, Inc. § vs } ¢ L Beaver and F N Belk trading as j Beaver - Belk Company. j This cause coming on to be heard bef A Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court and it appearing that the B Belk Company is a corp- oration and that no ljiability attaches to C L Beaver and F N Belk personally. It is therefore ordered and adjudged tha he above action be and the same id hereby non-suited and that be t against the Farmers Warehouse and Oil Miiis, Inc. This the 20th day of December, iartness 7T Ve North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court Iredell County. | 3efore the Clerk + J © Holmes, an Individual, Trading 4 as J C Holmes Bumber Company. vs Everett L. Phifer. j be } ‘d before tha undersigned, Clerk This cause coming on to be heard before tha undersigned, C « of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on Monday, Jan. iv28, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued to the sheriff of Iredell County on the 25th day of November 1927, and that said summons, together with a copy of the plaintiff's verified complaint, were served personally on the defendant, Everett L Phifer, @n the 25th day of Nov. 1927, and that this is an action to recover an amount mof money certain on two certain promissory notes of the defendant which are capable of being calculated; Ahd it appearing to the Court that the defendant has not appeared or filed any answer or ‘pleedings within thirty Gays from the date of the service of summons and verified copy of the complaint in this satse, exclusive of the a@ day of service and that no issue has been raised for trial by the jury;