Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1924-1925Monday,January 28th,1924 North Carolina, In The Superior Court, Iredell County. ) January Term,1924. Be it remembered that « Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid,on the 5th Monday before the lat Monday in March,1924,the same being the 28th aay of Januarg,1924,when and where His Honor,w#.F.Harding, Judge Presiding,is present and presid- ing,and the Hon.Zeb.V.Long,sSolicitor and Prosecuting Attorney,in pres- ent and prosecuting in the name of the state. M.P.Alexander,the High sheriff of Iredell county is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to werve as jurors dor the first week of this Term,to-wit: The following were drawn as grand jurors,towit: w.M.Gaither,3.J.Tharpe, Ben A.Stimson, Joe I.Hoover,w.G.McLelland,&.L.Wasson,P.M.Ostwalt,L.M. Nesbit,B.B.Coockrell,w.D.Templeton,H.C.Nash,G.D.Speaks,J.T.Nicholson, Julian U.Moore, Jas.v.Rimmer,w.W.Caldwell,Glenn whité/S.H.Houston. weD.Templeton,was appointed and sworn 4s Foreman of the Grana Jury. 0.B.Lazenby was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. ™ APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Continued under former order. No.5 ) State ) vs ) Fatty s3isk ) Jessie smith ) Grudger Barnes) Ralph Hefner ) No.6 PERJURY. State Alias Capias. vs 0.C.Allred No.8 BIGAMY. State The Defendent called and failed. It is adjudgéd by vs the Court that the state recover judgment absolute for Joe Tate for the bond of $200.00 from the bondsmen. No.10 LARCENY AND RECEIVING. State Alias Capias. va Luke Wallace HWoell State va Lake Wallace No.23 state vs WoW.Carter No.32 State vs Lum Sharpe No.3 State vs Gaikher Hays No.7 State Vs Nallie Overcash No.16 state vs Lonnie Reavis No.24 State vs Jas.Hager No.25 state vs Jas .Hager No.4l1 state vs will Young. No.35 state vs Carl sinclair No.36 State v3 Lonnie Baxter FAILURE TO LIST PROPERTY YOR TAXES. Nol Prossed with leave. Assault with deadly weapon. Nol prossed with leave. TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR The defendent appeared and showed good behavior and is discharged. ) ) ) ) TO APPEAR aND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. The dstendent appeared and showed good behavior. Continved under former order. )TO aPPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. — ee ee ee ee ee ) )e ) The defendent appeared and showed good behavior. ontinued under former order. ASISAULT wITH DEAD WEAPON. Continued for the defendent, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Continued for the deftendent. LARCENY. The detendent waives the bill and pleads guilty to Forceable Trespass. Upon recommendation of the solicitor, judgment is suspended upon the payment of costs. HOUSEBREAKING AND LARCENY. The defendent enters a plea of guilty in the Count of Larceny. Nol prossed as to housebreaking. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued upon the payment of the costs and of the payment of $25.00 to &.B.Roach. It is further ordered that the defendent give a bond in the sum of $200.00 for his appearance at each term of this Court for two years,and show good behavior. HOU SEB. AKING AND LARCENY. The defendent enters a plea of guilty in the count of Tha edicans pesates es to the count of housebreaking> 8 udged by the Court thatpbager for magnent be continued upon the payment of the i e payment of the sum of $200.00 for E.B.Roach. It is further ordered that the defendent give a bond in the sum of $200.00 for his appearance at each term of this Court for two years and show good behavior. No.3d )LARCENY AND RECEIVING. State ) va Ross Lee Conner ) Thig Honorable Court adjourns until Tuesday Morning, January 29th,1924,at 9:30 o'clock A.M. The defendent,thwaugh his .ttorneys,Grier & )Grier,enter @ ple@ of not guilty. Continued to Jan.39,1924. ‘s on Tuesday, January 29th,1924. This Honorable Court convened Tuesday Morning, January,29th, 1924,at 9:30 o'clock A.M.,for the dispatch of business. No.35 State vs Ross Lee VConner No. 28 state v3 Carl Troutman Rob Troutman alfred Troutman No.46 State Vs Kobt. Troutman No.40 state vs H.L.Ellis No.l9 State vs June Troutman )LARCENY AND KRHCKIVING. ) Continued from January 28th,1924. ) The Jury,after being duly eworn and empannelled )for their verdict,find that the detendent is not guilty Jin the charge of larceny,and that he is guilty in the }count of Keceiving. ) It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the )defendent be confined in the common jail of Iredell )vounty for @ term of 6 months,to be worked on roads for )said term. LARVENY AND RECEIVING. Alias Capias,as to Carl Troutman. The detendent,alfred 'routman,called and failed. Judg- ment Nisi sci Fa and capias. Continued for the state. ) ) ) ) } ) LaktusNY AND RECKIVING. Continued for the state. FORCHABLE TRESPASS Continued for State. SELLING, KEEPING ,RECKIVING aND TxANSPORTING LIQUOR. The defendent,through his &torneys W.v.Turner and Buren Jurney,enter a plea of guilty in the count of possessing liquor for the purpose of sale and in the count of transporting. It is ordered and adjudged by the vourt that the defendent be confined to the common jail of Iredell County dor a term of 8 months to be worked on the pub- lic roads of Iredell County for said term,and to pay the costs to be taxed by the Clerk of this Vourt. : Upon the payment of the costs,the defendent is to 6 released. Capias to issue upon the motion of the Solicitor,in order that out. this judgment may be carried ee eee eee ee )TO APPEAR AND SHOW THAT HE - - )LENT OF THe COURT. H&S COMPLIED WITH THE JUDG ) The defendent called )fa and capias. ed und failed. Judgment Nisi sci ‘~ Wo.38 State vs Lonzo Jimigon ) No.39 State vs Lonzo Jimisozn No. 37 State vs Chas.Richel No.42 State vs Chas.Ritchel No.43 State va ) CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON. ) The defendent,through his Attorney,enters = plea of )Forceable Trespass,which the Court accepts. It ig ordered and adjudged by the Court that the de- )fendent be confined in the common jail of Iredell County )for @ term of 2 months,to be worked on the public roads )for swid term. ) HOUSEBREAKING AND LARCENY. ) The defendent,through his Attorney,enters a plea of )guilty of Larceny as charged in the Bill. ) It is ordered by the Court that the defendent be con- }fined in the common jail of Iredell County for @ term of }6 montha to be worked on the roads of Iredell County for }gaaid period. The senterice to take effect at the expirea- )tion of the sentence in No.38. FORGERY. The defendent enters a plea of guilty as charged in the warrant. It is ordered by the Court thet the defendent be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of 6 months to be worked on the roads for said term. ) FORGERY. ) The detendent enters a plea of guilty. ) It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the )defendent be confired in the common jail of Iredell coun- )ty for a term ~ of 6 months to be worked on the roads )for seid perms The sentence to take effect at the expi- )ration of the sentence in No.37. ) HOUSEBREAKING AND LARCENY. ) The defendents,through their &Atorneys,Grier and Grier ) gome into court and enter a plea of guilty. Jessie Limebough It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer Henry Loyd Claud Finison No.44 State vs ) for judgment be continued upon the payment of the costs ) to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. ) HOUSEBREAKING AND LARCENY. ) The defendents,through their Attorneys Grier and )Grier,come into open Court and enter a plea of guilty. Jesse Limebough) It is ordered by the Court that prayer for judg. Henry Loyd Claud Finison Limebough Loyd Finison )ment be continued upon the paymant of the costs,to be )taxed by the Clerk of this Court. LARCENY. The defendents,through their attorneys,Grier and ) Grier,come into open court and enter ea plea of guilty. ) It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that pray- ) er for judgment be continued upon the payment of the ) costs to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Tuesday ,January 29th,1924. No.20 )POSSESSING AND TRANSPORTING LIQUOR. State ) The defendent comes into open court and enters a vs )plea of guilty. Sallie Carlton ) It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the )defendent be confined in the common jail of Iredell }County for a serm of 8 months,to be assigned,at the jaomeee’ = De ae ee aye ee the Home fér-the Aged and Infirm o redell County,and to jin this case. : — ) Upon the payment of the costs,the defendent is to )be released. Capias to issue upon motion of the Solig- )itor,in order that this judgment may be carried out. This Honorable Court adjourns until Wednesday Morning, Jan- uary ,30th,1924,at 9:30 o'clock. ye (/ (ards Judge Presiding ee 4 Wednesday, Jan. 50th,1924, This Honorable Court convened Wednesday Morning, Janua S0th 1924 at 9:30 o'clock 4.M.,for the dispatch of business. - No.37 ) BXEREKRXXXEE PURCHASING AND. POSSESSING LIQUOR. State ) The defendentg pleais guilty to the charge of pur- vs )chasing and possessing Liquor. Chas.Richel ) It is ordered by the Court that prayer for judgment )be continued. FALSE PRETENSE. The defendent comes into court and enters a plea of No.40 guilty of false pretense as charged in the warrant. ) State It ig ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued xpumxctka. vs Chas. Richel GRAND JURY REPORT. North Carolina, January Term,12.4 Iredell County. Hon.W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding: We,The Grand Jury,beg leave to submit our report as follows: We acted upon all bills sent before us and made due return of the same to the Court. we visited the County jail ana found 1 female and 10 male white prisoners and 7 male colored prisdners. The prisoners report that they are well fed and properly cared for in every respect. we find the jail in a sanitary condition. We visited the various offices in the Court house and found all the offices in good condition and all records properly cared for. We recommend that the County Commissioners provide an additional book case for the proper caring of the law books in the vourt room. We visited the vounty Home by Committee,and found 8 white males, 14 white females,7 colored males and 7 colored females. Total number inmates ~- 2&7. The inmates,without exception made us no complaint as to the man- agement. We found that the home was in a sanitary condition and that the inmates were well oared for in every particular. We visited the chain gang by committee and found 8 white and 11 colored men,who report that they are receiving satisfactory care and treatment,that they received sufficient wholesome food and that liv- ing quarters are comfortable. We recommend that additional shelves be added in the vault in the Clerk's office for the proper caring of the records. wednesday, January S0th,1924. No.47 & 48 )FORNICATION AND ADULTRY,AND SEDUCTION. State ) The defendent Maggie Helms comes into open court and vs jenters a plea of guilty e@ Fornication and adultry. The Lon Cox )defendent,through his Counsel,enters a plea of not guilt Maggie Helms )in either of the counts. y ) The Jury,after being duly sworn and empannelled for )their verdict,find that the defendent is not guilty in )the charge of seduction,but find that the defendent igs )guilty of the charge of Fornication and aAdultry. ) It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the de- )fendent Lon Cox be confined in the cokmon jail of Iredell )County for a term of 12 months,¢o be worked on the roads jof Iredell County for said term. ) Prayer for judgment continued as to thedefendent )Mageie Helms. No.51 ) LARCENY. State ) Nol prossed with leave. vs Jesse Limebough Henry Loyd ) Claud Finison ) No.19 TO APPEAR AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE JUDGMENT OF THE ) State ) COURT. —— ) The defendent having been called out on Tuesda - June Troutman )the 29th,1924,and judgment having been entered comer )him,and the defendent now appearing and showing to the )Court that he has compliea with the judgment of the )Court,it is now ordered that the judgment as above en- )tered,be striken out. It is ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall issue a subpoenas to States witnesses,and issue all Capiases immediately after adjournment of this Court er’ as soon thereafter as practicable and place them i arr: n the hands of the Sheriff to the end that they may This Honorable Court aajourns until Thu i ‘ red Morning, January J4l1st,1924,at 9:30 o'clock A.M. ,for ey dispatch 7 Gasinase. udge Dresiding. 4 Thursday,January Slst,1924. This Honorable Court convened Thursday Morning, January 1924,at 9:30 o'clock A.M.,for the dispatch of business. No.10 C.B.Stewart,aAdmr.of Carl Stewart Continued by consent. ) ) ) ) vs Miller Manufacturing Co. No.39 Jas.C.Davis,Director General) of Railways vs ) Continued by consent. J.¥%.Morrison Gro @ Pro.Co. ) No.88 ) Rib:Dickens and Fannie Dickens vs ) Gontinued by consent J.P.Nicholson ) No.89 A.D.Brawley Continued and remanded to Clerk Superior vs court. Dora Gray et al No.90 Statesville Lumber Co. Continued by consent. vs Eugene Hollana No.91 ) The plaintiff comes into court and takes Statesville Lumber Co. )a voluntary non-suit. vs ) It is ordered by the Court that the plain- R.F. Gwaltney )tiff pay the costs of this action. No.19 Sherrill Lumber Co. Continued for the Plaintiff. vs E.3.Goodin et al No.3 In the superior Court North Carolina, January Term,1924. Iredell County J.W.Westmoreland vs * Lula Westmoreland Rirst. Were the plaintiff ana detendent married as alleged? ans. Yea. and. Hee the plaintiff ana the defendent lived separate and apart for five consecutive years next preceeding the commencement of this action? newer. Yes. ) ) ISSUES. ) Thuréday,January olst,1924. Srd. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years next preceeding the commenoment of this action,and the filing of the complaint? Answer, Yes. No.3 ) North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court ) ) Iredell County. January Term,1924. J.W.Westmoreland ) vs Lula Westmoreland) JUDGMENT. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor,W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding and a jury,and being heard at this Term and the jury having answered the issues as follows: lst. Were plaintiff ana defendent married as alleged? Answer. Yes. end. Have plaintiff ana defendent lived separate and apart for five consecutive yoars next preceeding the commencment of this action? Answer. Yes. ord. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more then five years next preceeding the commencment of this action and the filing of the complaint? answer,Yes. It is therefore ordered ana adjudged that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendent be and the Same are hereby dissolved and that the Clerk tax the cost as provided by law. wm.}!.Harding Judge Presiding. No.3l ) In the Superior Court, North Caroling, ) Iredell County. ) January Term, 1924. Florence B.Ramsey,Plaintiff ) versus ) ISSUES. James M.Ramsey,detendent ) One; Did the plaintiff and defendent intermarry as alleged in the complaint,in Iredell County,North Carolina? Answer. Yes. Two: Has the plaintiff been a resident of Iredell county,North Carolina tor two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. Three: bid the detenaent separate himself from the plaintiff and commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Yes. ¥Yourth: Did the defendent separate himself from his wife and the children of their marriage and fail to provide them with necessary subsistence? Answer. Yes. North Carolina, ) In the superior Court, Iredell County. ) January Term,1°924. Florence B.Ramsey ) va ) Order setting aside Verdict. James M. Ramsey ) Upon the coming in of the jury and renedition of their ver- dict in the above entitled matter,it is ordered and adjudged by the ‘Court,in its discretion,that the verdict of the jury be,and the same is hereby set aside and a mistrial of the cause ordered. Thursday Morning,January oist,1924 And it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has applied for @# warrant of attachment in the above entitled action,it is or- dered that publication of an alias summons and a notice of the wgr- rant of Attachment be made as provided by law. wm. F.Harding Judge Presiding. No.e29 annie Beaver,Admx.of Luther Beaver) after hearing a part of the vs ) evidence in this action,the case H.DeWitt Mills ana Hugh Mills. ) is continued over to Friday Morn- ing, ¥eb.1lst,1924. This Honorable Court adjourns until Friday Morning, February, 1lst,1924,at 9:30 o'clock a.M.. 4 Juage Presidigg 4 Friduy Morning,February 1lst,1924. This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment on Yriday Morning,¥ebruary 1st,1924,at 9:30 o'clock a.M.,for the dispatch of business. No.29 Annie Beaver, ammx.of Luther Beaver ‘ This case being continued over from ) vs ) ) ) Thursday, January 51s8t,1924, it is now H.Dewitt Mills and Hugh Mills taken up and the jury answered the issues submitted to them as follows: No.29 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. January Term,1924. Annie Beaver, AaAdmr.@f ) Luther Beaver ) V3. ) ISSUES. H.DeWitt Mills and ) Hugh Mills. ) (1) Was the plaintiff's intestate killed by the negligence of the defendent,Hugh Mills,as alleged in the complaint? answer: No. (2) Did the plaintiff's intestate contribute to his death by his own negligence,as alleged in the answer? Answer: (3) Was defendent,Hugh Mills,the agent or servant ofthe defendant H.DeWitt Mills,at the time of the collision,as alleged in the com> plaint? answer; (4) What damages,if any,is plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: Friday, Feb.1lst,1924 North Carolina, In The Superior Court Iredell County. January Term,1924. No.3d L.P.Claywell vs JUDGMENT. gmith Hallman ) This cause coming on to be heard at this Term and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendent have compromised and set- tled their differences and that the defendent has paid to the plaintiff the amount agreed upon: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the action be and it is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered that the defendent pay the costs. wm.F. Harding Judge Presiding By Consent: Grier & Grier Attorney for Plaintiff. John A.Scott,Jr.attorney for Befendent. North Carolina, ) In The superior Court Iredell County. ) No.1? J.A-Brady,doing business as Brady Printing Company JUDGMENT. ) ) ) v3 ) ) ) J.P.Burns This cause coming on at the January Term,1924 to be heard and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendent have settled all matters of difference between themselves and that the de- fendant has paid to the plaintiff the amount agreed upon in full set- tlement: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Pleintiff? be and he is hereby non-suited and this action dismissed. It is therefore ordered that the defendant shall pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the court. i fare ne ge Presiding By Consent John a.Scott,Jr.attorney for Plaintiff $elf,Bagby & Aiken,a&torney for Defendant. This Honorable Court edjourns until Monday Morning february 4th 1924,at 10:00 o'oloack Ae oe Judge Pres Monday,February 4th,1924 Second Week, Iredell County Superior Court North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ) January Term,1924. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock A.M.,Monday, February 4th,1924,when and where His Honor,w.F. Harding,Judge presiding,is present and presiding,this the second week for civil cases at January Term,1924. M.P.Alexander,the High sheriff of Iredell County,returned into Open Vourt the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors of this court for this,the second week,to-wit: &.M.Current,k.0. Shoemaker,U.C.Freeze,w.F. Johnson,Thos.B.Williams,s.A.Robbins,#.E.Miller Geo.B.Upton, J. F.Messick,H.C.Delinger, Jas.w.Brown,koger G.Moore,J.Clyde aothe, 3-6, :4etpbtadicngs abide a, a a » frank 4. Anderson, J.PoRumple, 8.4. akbe tt feos w.B. Turner. 3.M.Madison}was returned ot to be found". H.F.Ervin was excused on account of sigkness. No.40 Jas.W.Brown ) ) vs Continued for the Plaintiff. ) H.C.Hunter No.84 J.X.Patterson et al Fhe Following geet anh. Lense) men gare ) ) pe ‘gies and empannelled for their verdict in )this case: RM. ; i icine ce! 8 re e: R.M.Current,#.0.Shoemaker,vu.C. of Snow Creek Church. ) Freeze,w.F. Johnson, Thos.B.Williams,s.A.Rob- bins ,x.E.Miller,Geo.B.Upton,J.F.Messick,H.C. 6H Dellinger, Jas.w.Brown,ana Koger G.Moore. North Carolina, ) In the Superior vourt, Iredell County.) January Term,1924. In the matter of the) Will of D.J.Eagle ea lst: Q. Is the paper-writing propounded and every part thereof the last will and testament of D.J.Kagle? Ae Yes ma- ¥ 4 North Carolina, ) In The Superior Court Iredell County.) _ January Term,1924. In the Matter of the) ) JUDGMENT. Will of vD.J.Kagle ) This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Super- jor court of Iredell County before His Honor,w.F.Harding,Juage Pre- siding,and a jury,anad the jury having founda the issués submitted to them in favor of the propounder,w.w.Hollend,administrator of v.J.Eagle and by their verdict,find that the paper writing was the last will and testament and every part thereof of ).J.Kagle. It is therefore considered,ordered and adjudged by the Court that said paper writing and every part thereof is the last will and testament of v.J.Eagle. It is further considered,ordered ana adjudged by consent of w.W.eHollena,administrator of ).J.Eagle,and the caveators and trustees of Snow Creek Methodist Church,1lst: that W.W.Hollanda,the administrator of D.J.Eagle with the will annexed,shall continue of administer said estate,settle and disburse the funds es herein provided. end: That all just and legal obligations aguinst the estate or D.J.Kagle shall be paia by saia administrator. ora: That all cleims against said estate that may be contested shull be defended by the counsel of the propounder anda to the caveators jointly,or the same may be adjusted by their consent. 4th: That all specific legacies mentionea in the will shall be paid as therein directed. bth: That the personal property mentioned in the will shall be delivered to the beneficiaries or legateéés as contemplated by the fir. 6th: That the expenses of the settlement of seid estate shall be pai out of the general fund belon,ing to said extate. 7th: That the lanas mentioned in said will shall be sold at public sele,after due advertisement, to the highest ana best biader upon the following terms,to-wit: One third cash; one-third in three months and balance in six months,with privilege on the part of purchaser to pay cash in full,amd €1 deferred payments to bear interest at six per cent from date of sale,and for the purpose of putting — of the judgment into execution,it is ordered that w.WeHolland,be ama he is hereby appointed a commivsioner to gell the eforesaid lends ana dis- tribute the funds erieing therefrom,as provided by this decree. That Monuay,#ebruary 4th,1924 the net proceeds derived from the sale of the land and after full settlement of the estate shall be divided as follows,to-wit: Sixty per cent thereof shall be paid to the Trustees of Snow Creek Muthod- ist Episcopal Church South of Western North Carolina Conference for the use and behefit of said Church in keeping up the grave yard in Olin Township,Iredell County,North Carolina,saia funds to be invested with the Trustees of saia vhurch,and the income derived therefrom ap- plied to upkeep of grave-yard as contemplated by the will of saa b.J. Kkagle; that said Administrator shall pay to the caveators forty per cent of the net proceeds from the sale of said lanas,and che net pro- ceeds of said estate after the settlement of the same and the payment of all costs or Litigation ana administration as provided in this de- cree. 8th: That W.wW.eHolland,as Administrator of the will annexed of the said v.J.Ktagle,shall retain for his services sixty per cent of the usual commissions allowed by law for the settlement of the estate,and forty per cent thereof shall be paid to caveators or their é6torneys, according to their respective interests. 9th: That the present lease of the tract of lana mentioned in saia will for the year 1924 to Charlie King shall be recognized and the lands sola subject to said lease,and the rents derived therefrom to be divided as heretofore specified,to-wit: Sixty per cent to the Trustees and forty per cent to the caveators. : 10th: That W.W.Holland,Administrator,shall pay without further delay the claims against the estate for the ditching of said lands of the deceased or any obligations incurred for borrowed money for the same purpose,not exceeding $75.00. llth: That said Administrator may also pay any taxes aguinst the estate,the dredge taxes,or assessments not included in this agree- ment,the taxes referred to being State and County taxes. This decree and judgment is entered by consent of the parties hereto. Wn. F.Hardi Judge Presiding Leth Judicial District. By Consent: H.P.Grier & F.Grier W.D.Turner, Attorneys for Plaintiff W.AeBristol J-H.Burke, attorneys for pefendent. Monday,February 4th,1924 No.83 R.F. Gwaltney v3 Continued by consent. R.H.Mason No.32 Mary E.Lisk,Admr. of E.D.Lisk The jury having been sworn and empannelled vs until Tuesday Morning, Feb.5th,1924. ) ) | )for their verdict,this case is continued over ) ) ) Town of Mooresville This Honorable Court adjourns until Tuesday Morning, ¥eb. 5th,1924,at 9:30 o'clock A.M. 4 lp plce F Judge Presiding. Tuesday, February 5th,1924. This Honorable Court convened Tuesday Morning,February 5th, 1924,at 9:30 o'clock A.M.,according to adjournment,for the dispatch of business. No.32 Mary E.Lisk,Admx.of E.D.Lisk vs Town of Mooresville This case being continued over from Monday mony for both plaintiff and defendent is finish- ) | February 4th,it is now taken up,and the testi- ) ) ed. Two arguments by Attorneys from each side have been made,and the case is continued over until Wednesday, Feb.6th,1924. This Honorable Court adjourns until Wednesday Morning,February 6th,1924,at 9:30 o'clock A.M. Judge 7 Vednesday,February 6thm1924 This Honorable Court convened Wednesday Morning, February 6th,1924, at 9; 50 o'clock,according to adjournment,for the dispatch of business. No.32 Mary E.Lisk,Admx.of This case being continued over from Tues-~- E.D.Lisk ) ) )day,February 5th,1924,it is now taken up, the vs ) ceremnes concluded,the Court charged the jury Town of Mooresville and gave the case to them for their verdict. No.60 Continued by consent. J.M.Lowe vs J.A.Davidson No.73 M.H.Mceknight Continued by consent vs Lee Rankin No.70 North Carolina, Iredell County. Della Reavis In The Superior Court vs ISSUES. January Term,1924. Raymond Reavis First: Were the plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Second: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years immediately preceeding the filing of the com- plaint in this action? | Answer: Yes. Third: Did the defendent commit adultry as alleged in the scom- plaint? Answer: Yes. Wednesday ,February 6th,1924,. me 79 North Carolina, In The Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1924. Della Reavis vs JUDGMENT. Raymond Reavis This cause coming on to be heard,before His Honor,W.F. Harding,Judge Presiding and a jury,and being heard and the jury having answered the issues &s follows: lst. Were the plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Yes. 2nd. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years immediately preceeding the filing of the complaint in this action? Answer: Yes. 5rd. Did the defendent commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the bonds of mat- rimony heretofore sxisting between the plaintiff and defendent be and the same are hereby dissolved and the Clerk is directed to charge the cost according to law. Wm.F.Harding Jugge Presiding No.50 McKnight Auto Co. The jury having been sworn and empannelled ) ) vs — their verdict,the testimony is taken and ) W.T.Lyttle the case is continued over until Friday, February 8th,1924. This Honorable Court adjourns until Thursday Morning, Feb- ruary 7th,1924 at 9:30 o'clock A.M. 7 Judge Presfding Thursday,February 7th,1924 No.32 This case having been continued over from Mary E.Lisk,Admx,of E.D.Lisk Wednesday, February 6th,1924,the jury have an- vs swered the issues as shown in the following: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Town of Mooresville n- 3 ~ North Carolina, In The Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1924. Mary E.Lisk,Admr.of E.D.Lisk vs Town of Mooresville (1) Was the plaintiff's intestate killed by the negligene= of the defendent,as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. (2) Did the plaintiff's intestate by his own negligence contribute to his death? Answer: No. (3) Did T.3.Fleming,the owner of the garage ,make application to the defendent's agents or employees to have the wiring in gaid garage in- spected after the same had been installed? Answer: Yes. (4) Did the defendent through its agents or employees inspect the wiring installed in said garage? Answer: No. (5) What damage,if any,is plaintiff entitled to recover of de- fendent? Answer: $3000.00 fThree Thousand Dollars. Thursday , February, 7th,1924. North Carolina, In The Superior Court Iredell County. January Term,1924. No.59 W.W.Rankin Co. VS~e L.N.Brown and Herman Brown. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor,W.F. Harding,Judge Presiding,and being heard and it appearing that the parties have settled this cause out of court: It is therefore ordered am adjudged that this action be and the same is hereby non-suited and the Clerk is ordered to tax the cost against the plaintiff. Wm. F.Hardai Judge Presi This Honorable Court adjourns until Friday Morning,February 8th,1924 at 9:30 o'clock A.M. Judge/ Presiding. Friday,February 8th,1924 This Honorable Court convened Friday Morning,February 8th,1924, at 9:30 o'clock A.M.,according to adjournment,for the dispatch of busi- ness. No.55 McKnight Auto Co. ) ) vs ) Issues. ) ) J.3.Archer Is the defendent indebted to the Plaintiff,and if so in what amount. $53.06 with interest from April 12,1923. mae 65 North Carolina, ) In The Superior Court Iredell County. ) January Term,1924. McKnight Auto Co. ) = J.S.Archer } This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor,W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding and a jury and being heard,and it appearing that the jury answered the issue as set out in the record,that the defendent is indebteed to the plaintiff in the sum of $53.06 with interest from April 16,1923 at six per cent. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover $53.06 with interest from April 16,1923 at six per cent per annum and the cost of this action,from the defendent. Wm.F. Harding Judge Presiding North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court Iredell County Josephine Nicholson, Administratrisz of the estate of Lonnie Davidson, deceased ,Plaintif?. ISSUES. VS. Southern Railway Co.Defendent Was the plaintiff's intestate,Lonnie Devidson killed by the neg- ligence of the defendent as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Did the plaintiff's intestate by his own negligence contribute to his death? Answer: No. What damage,if any,has the plaintiff susteined? Answer: $1400. Friday,February 8th,1924 North Carolina, | In The Superior Court. Iredell County. | Josephine Nicholson, Administratrix of the estate of Lonnie Davidson, ) ) deceased. ) vs ) ) ) Southern Railway Comnany This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court before Hig . Honor ,W.F.Harding,Judge Presiding,am a jury,and being heard,and His Honor having submitted to the jury,am the jury having answered the issues,as follows, towit: Was the plaintiff's intestate,Lonnie Davidson killed by the neg- ligence of the defendent,as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Did the plaintiff's intestate by his own negligence contribute to death? Answer: No. | What damage,if any,has the plaintiff sustained? Answer: $1,400.00. It is,therefore,considered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendent the sum of $1,400.00,with interest from the 9th day of February,1924,until paid,together with the cost of this ac- tion to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Wn. F.Harding Judge Presiding North Carolina, ) Iredell County. ) In The Superior Court. Marie Nicholson Davidson, by her Next Friend, Jose- phine Nicholson,Plaintiff VS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Southern Railway Co.Defendent Was the plaintiff's deceased husband Lonnie Davidson,killed by the negligence of the defendent as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Did the plaintiff's deceased husband by his own negligence con- tribute to his death? Answer: No. What damage,if any,has the plaintiff sustained? Answer: $100.00 Fréday,February 8th,1924 North Carolina, In The Superior Court. ) ) Iredell County. )} Marie Nicholson Davidson,by her next friend, Josephine Nicholson VSe JUDGMENT. Southers Railway Company. This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court begore His Honor,W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding,and a jury, ami being heard,and His Honor havigg submitted to the jury,and the jury having answered the issues,as follows ,to-wit: Was the plaintiff's deceased husband,Lonnie Davidson, kill- ed by the negligence of the defendent,as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. Did the plaintiff's deceased husband by his own negligence contribute to his death? Answer: No. What damage,if any,has the plaintiff sustained? Answer: $100.00 It is,therefore,considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendent the sum of $100.00,with in- terest from the 9th day of February,1924,until paid,together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Wm. F Harding Judge Presiding No. 56 J.W.Copeland Continued. vs Mary Rivers Copeland No.61 Hilliard Summers VSe Continued. Gertrude Summers No.65 Gainer Sign and Ad- vertising Co. vs Continued. W.L.Money and Cobb Noble Co. ee ee ee ee ee ee Friday,February 8th,1924 Friday,February 8th,1924 No.66 Bank of Stony Pint The defendent called and failed. It is ordered by the vs D.D.LittleJohn et al No-67 McKnighl Auto Co. vs Rice and Ratledge No.73 M.H.MoKnight vs Lee xankin No.76 WeReKelly vs W.A.Shore No.78 WeR.Kelly vs R.Duke Hay No.79 WeR.Kelly vs James M.Richardson No.2 L.Ellis Hayes,Admr of) M.I.Campbell ) ) VS. ) ) Columbus Campbell ) No.3 Mre.Louise Hayes vs Columbus Hayes Continued. Continued. Continued Continued Continued Continued. Continued Continued. ) ) vs Court that capias be issued,and that the dase be con- ) Maggie Helms No.5 J-H.licklwee ) ) Continued vs ) ) ) Hutton & Bourbonnais No.6 A.J.Keller et al Continued. vs Charlie Hicks et al No.7 Royal Motor Co. vs Continued Cagsl Stimson No.8 We T., Webster & We we fatheson vs Continued. J.3.Stezer No.9 W.C.Johnston et al vs Continued F.H.Shoaf No.12 Statesville Lumber Co ) v3 )) Continued. ) ) R.L.Church et al No.14 Jas.C.Davis,Director General of Railways vs ) Continued. ) ) Cleveland Manufacturing Co ‘A oe ee Friday ,February 8th,1924 No.15 Jas,C.Davis,Director General of Railways Continued vs Statesville Veneer Co. No.16 J.0.Wilcox vs Continued Robert Daniels etal No.20 JoT.Smith et al ) ) vs ) Continued. ) Iredell Farmers Union Whse Co.) No.23 L.C.Caldwell ) Continued. v3 The death of the Plaintiff is suggested, L.O.White case is continued until next term. Notice to issue to the administratrix to come in and make herself a party and prosecute the case if she so 7 95 No.25 desire. Statesville Lumber Co.)) ) vs ) Continued } N.G.Holmes et al ) No.26 Statesville Lumber Co. ) } vs ) Continued. ) Dorsett Fraley et al No.28 W.H.Wood ) ) vs, ) Continued ) ) Mooresville Cotton Mills No.35 Eastman Gardner Co. vs Continued. J.C.HOlmes Co. No .45 Neal-Plott Gro Co. vs Continued. R.M.Hudson Co, Friday, February 8th,1924 Ina 7? North Carolina, ) In The Superior Court Tredell County. Before the Clerk. Ed Howard vs ISSUES. Etta Howard (1) Has the plaintiff been a pesident of the State of North Car- olina for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action? Answer: Yes. (2) Were the plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. (3) Have the plaintiff and defendent lived separate and apart for five successive years,immediately prior to filing the comptaint in this action as alleged in the compannt? Answer: Yes. Ma 9? North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court Iredell County. ) Ed Howard ) vs ) JUDGMENT Etta Howard ) This cuase coming on to be heard at this term of Yourt before His Honor WyF.Harding, Judge Prsiding and a jury,and the jury having answered the issues submitteaé to them as follaws:. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State pf North Carolina for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action? Answer; Yes. Were the plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the com- plaint? Answer: Yes. Have the plaintiff and defendent lived separate and apart for five successive years immediately prior to the filing of the comphaint in this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. WHEREFORE,it is ordered,adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff,Ed Howard and the defendent,Etta Howard be,and the same are hereby dis-solved, and the said kd.Howard is granted an absolute divorce from the defen- dent .Etta Howard. It is further ordered that the plaintiff be taxed with the cost by the Clerk of this Court. Friday ,February 8th,1924 No.15 Jas,C.Davis,Director General of Railways Continued ) ) ) vs ) ) ) Statesville Veneer Co. No.16 J.0.Wilcox vs Continued Robert Daniels etal No.20 JoT.Smith et al ) ) vs ) Continued. ) Iredell Farmers Union Whse Co.) No.23 L.C.Caldwell Continued. ) } vs ) The death of the Plaintiff is suggested, i L.O.White ) gase is continued until next term. Notice to issue to the administratrix to come in and make herself a party and prosecute the case if she so T 25 No.25 desire. Statesville Lumber Co.) ) ) vs ) Continued ) N.G.Holmes et al ) No.26 Statesville Lumber Co. ) ) vs Continued. ) ) Dorsett Fraley et al No.28 W * H Wo od ) ) vs, ) Continued ) ) Mooresville Cotton liills No.35 Eastman Gardner Co. vs Continued. J.C.Holmes Co. No .45 Neal-Plott Gro Co. ve Continued. R.M.Hudson Co, Friday,February 8th,1924 Wa 7? North Carolina, In The Superior Court Tredell Cou..ty. Before the Clerk. Ed Howard vs Etta Howard (1) Has the plaintiff been a pesident of the State of North Car- olina for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action? Answer: Yes. (2) Were the plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. (3) Have the plaintiff and defendent lived separate and apart for five successive years, immediately prior to filing the compiaint in this action as alleged in the compannt? Answer: Yes. Mr 97 North Carolina, In the Superior Count Iredell County. Ed Howard vs JUDGMENT Etta Howard This cuase coming on to be heard at this term of Yourt before His Honor WwF.Harding, Judge Prsiding and a jury,and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follaws:. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State pf North Carolina for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action? Answer: Yes. Were the plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the com- plaint? Answer: Yes. Have the plaintiff and defendent lived separate and apart for five successive years immediately prior to the filing of the comphaint in this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. WHEREFORE,it is ordered,adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff,Ed Howard and the defendent,Etta Howard be,and the same are hereby dis-solved, ana the said Ed.Howard is granted an absolute divorce from the defen- dent Etta Howard. | It is further ordered that the plaintiff be taxed with: se cost by the Clerk of this Court. Priday,February 8th,1924 No.38 J.L. Ingram vs Continued. Mie V.Bartles No.47 Mrs.N.E.Wes tmoreland vs Continued. ) } ) ) J.A.Westmoreland ) No.48 J.A.Westmoreland ) vs Continued. ) ) ) Mrs.M.E.Wes tmoreland) Statesville Lumber Co} ) vs ) Continued. N.G.Holmes No.86 JoBeHouve vs ) Continued. Della Houpe No.96 W.A.Somers v3 Continued. J.eA. Snow No.22 Mrs.William Wallace vs Continued. American Railway Express No.4 Merchants % Farmers Bank of) Mooresville vs Continued. D.AvBeam & L.A.Beam Mr.Dorman Thompson,one of the referees in the above case, having died, pending the reference it ig Sgreed by the parties, plaintiff and defendent, that the Surviving referee ,Mr.Dewey Raymer,be substituted ape shat hes Feport shall be the report of the referees in the said Friday,FPebruary 8th,1924 No. 42 Sawyer Bissuit Co. The plaintiff comes into court and takes vs @ voluntary non-suit. ) ) ) ) 0.) JeX.Morrison Gro & Pro © It is therefore ordered that this action be and the same is hereby non-~-suited,and the Clerk is ordered to tak the costs against the plaintiff. Noath Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court. Jan.Term, 1924 as as allah ak Amos Guy) vs Issues. J.3.Morrison (1) Is the defendent,J.S.Morrison, indebted to the plaintiff,and if so,in what amount? Answer: None (2) Is the defendent,Mrs.Elizabeth Morrison,wife of J.S.Morrison,in- debted to the plaintiff,and if 80,in what amount? Answer: None North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, Iredell County ) January Texm,1924. C.P.Moore,Admr.of Amos Guy) vs JUDGLENT J.3.Morrison and Elizabeth Morrison ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard at the January Term,1924,o0f the Superior Court,before His Honor,Judge W.#.Harding and a jury; and elizabeth Morrison,wife of. the defendent,J.S.Morrison,having come in~ to Court in her own proper person and by her attorney,and having made herself a party defendent to this action by order of the Court,and by agreement of all parties,and the jury having answered the issues sub- mitted to them,as follows: No.l. Is the defendent,iJ.3.Morrison, indebted to the plaintiff, and if go,in what manner? Answer: None No.2. Is the defendent,Mrs.Elizabeth Morrison,wife of dJ.3.Morri- Son, indebted to the phaintiff,and if so0,in what amount? AMswer; None. It is,therefore,considered,ordered and adjudged that the plein- tiff recover nothing against either of the defendents and that the de- fendents go hence without day. Friday,February 8th,1924° No.42. Continued. Tt is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. Wn. F,Harding Judge Presiding The plaintiff moves to set the verdict aside and for a new trial. Motion overruled.Plaintiff excepts. Judgment signed and plaintiff ex- cepts and appeals to Supreme Court. Notice waived in open court. Ap- peal bond fixed at $100.00. Plaintiff allowed 60 days in which to serve case on appeal and defendent 60 days thereafter counter case. In the event plaintiff does not give appeal bond,he may appeal on former peu- pers by complying with the statutes. Wm. F.Harding Judge Presiding No.36. Dorman Thompson, Receiver of Statesville Wood Pro- ducts Co. vs Judgment ) ) ) ) ) ) ) O.W.Slane The plaintiff comes into court and takes a mwoluntary non-suit. Plaintiff taxed with the costs. No 2 44 Barger bros. vs ) Remanded to Clerk Superior Court Thos.Thompson et al ) It is ordered by the Court that in all cases where pleadings are not filed,30 days is allowed nyse to file complaints and 30 days thereafter to file answers. No.29 Annie Beaver,Admx of Luther Beaver ) vs. ) H.DeWitt Mills am Hugh Mills ) The plaintiff moves to set the verdict aside for errors com-~ mitted by the Court in the progress of the trial. Motion overruled. Plaintiff excepts. Judgment signed. Plaintiff excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court. Notice waived in open Court. Appeal bond fixed at $100. By consent of all parties plaintiff allowed 30 days ‘io serve case On appeal,defendent allowed 30 days to serve countercase. Friday February 8th,1924 No.32 Mary E.Lisk,Admr of ) E.D.Lisk vs ) ) Town of Mooresville ) The defendent moves to set the verdict aside for errors com- mitted by the Court in the progress of the trial. Motion overruled. Defendent excepts. Judgment signed. Defendent excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court. Notice waived in open Court. Appeal bond fixed at $100. By consent of all parties defendent is allowed 60 days in which to serve case on appeal; plaintiff allowed 60 days after such service to file exceptions thereto or serve countercase. The defendent moves set the verdict aside on the further ground that it is contrary to the weight of the evidence on the second issue. Motion overruled. Defendent excepts. No.58 ° North Carolina, In The Superior Court Iredell County. ) L.J-Harrington )} vs JUDGMENT. C.C.Wagner Thig cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding,and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendent have compromised all matters in dispute between them in this action,the defendent agreeing to pay the plaintiff the sum of $12.50,and the plaintiff agreeing to accept the same in full of all claims and demands against the de- fendent; and it further appearing that the defendent has paid plain- tiff said amount; and it further appearing that under the terms of said compromise the plaintiff and the defendent were each to pay one-half the cost of this action. It ig,therefore,considered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing by reason of his writ,and that the Clerk of thé#s Court tax the cost of this action one-half against the plaintiff and the other one-half against the defendent. en iresiting nudge Presiding Approved Grier & Grier,Attys. for defendent. Signed agreement of compromise and receipt of plaintiff hereto attached and filed. Friday, February 8th,1924 This is to certify that the undersigned parties have agreed to compromise,and have made settlement agreeable with each Other,in the case of L.J.Harrington against C.C.Wagner. Said C.C. Wagner agrees to pay said L.J.Harringtom $12.50,being half the judgment,also agrees to pay one half Court cost. Said L.J.Harrington agrees to pay one half Court cost. C.C. Wagner Witness: W.3.Harwell Signed L.J.Harrington No.87 North Carolina, ) Inn The Superior Court ) Iredell County. ) January Term,1924 The Wallace Brothers Co. vs Judgment. ) ) ) ) WeJeFesperman and C.J. } Wilkinson ) This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor W.F. Harding, Judge Presiding at the January Term,1924 of the Superior Court of Ire- dell County and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and de- fendent have consented that judgment may be entered for the relief prayed in the complaint: Tt is therefore cOnsidered,ordered and agjouded that the plain- tiff have and recover of the defendents,\/.J.Fesperman and ¢.J.Wilkinson the sum of $500.00 ana interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid from the lst day of January,1922. It is further order- ed that the defendents pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Wm. ¥.Harding Judge Prsiding No.95 Baxter Morrison ) ) vs ) ISSUES. ) Lela Morrison ) Has plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for than five years prior to the beginning of this action? ANnSWer: Yes, Were plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the comphaint? Answer: Yes. Have the Plaintiff and defendent lived separate and apart for more ty five years immediately prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes, Yriday,¥ebruary 8th,1924 North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) January Term,1924, Baxter Morrison) vs JUDGMENT Lela Morrison This cause coming on to be heard before W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding,and a jury and the jury having answered the issues submitted in favor of the plaintiff,as set out in the record: It is therefore orderéd and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendent be, and the same are hereby anniled,and the plaintiff and defen- dent divorced from each other. Wm. F.Harding Judge Presiding North Carolina, In The Superior Court Iredell County. January Term,1924. No.70 Della Reavis vs Raymond Reavis First. Were the plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. Second Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years immediately preceeding the filing of the ocom- plaint in this action? Answer: Yes. Third Did the defendent commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. North Carolina, ) In The 3uperior Court. ) Iredell County. January Term, 1924. ) Della Reavis , vs JUDGLEINT. Raymond Reavis ) This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor,W.P. Priday,February 8th,1924 Harding,Judge Presiding,and a jury,and being heard and the jury having answered the issues as follows: lst. Were the plaintiff and defendent married as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. nd. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years immediately preceeding the filing of the com- plaint in this action? Answer: Yes. 3rd. Did the deferient commit adultry as alleged in the comp- plaint? Answer: Yes. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the bonds of mat- rimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendent be,and the same are hereby dissolved and the Clerk is directed to tax the cost according to law. Wm. F.Harding Judge Presiding North Carolina, In the Superior Ccurt Iredell County Before the Clerk Brown-Rogers Co., vs O.R-Mills, trading and doing ) business under the firm name ) and style of Mill Hlectric ) Company ) JUDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard snd being heard before J.aeHartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Ccunty on Monday, the 25th, day of Pebruury 1924, and it appeuring to the court that the summons in this action was issued on the 16th day of January 1924, and that the return date was January SOth, 1924, and it appearing to the court further, that tne complaint in this action was filed on cr before tne said date, and that the defendant is indebted to tne olaintiff in the sum of $243.23 with interest thereon from the first day of June, 19k, until paid ut the rate of 6 per cent per annum, and said sum ig due on an account for 4 certain stated amowit, and the de- ~~ fendant has failed and neglected to answer of demure in this Cause; If Is THEREFChE, ordered and udjudged that the plaintiff recover from the defendant the sum of $242.23 with interest at the rute cf 6 per annum from tne first day of June,1922, and that the defendant pay all the cost cf this action to be taxed by the clerc« of this court. This the 25th day of February, 1924. J. Hartness oR a tewvrewe [> BLP LOL LF [ASL LG OLR DE OF GSE. COGEGEGEE GSE CES UECELE ROX rs RLS LIL 7.7.7. | CECE CA ESEASECECE ECE GUCGECE TIT AT Ome © Ves Silat a being heard before the County, and being heard Sebruary 1924, and it appearing to the ssued on the 16th day of y personal the r before the plain- percent tha&.the ee & ee Se: GS OSs Bice ewes & Asks & See Meuk te eleles 7 NTrvATtH OULU db record wherecf aid superior Court. considered und adjudged by the Court here, that ur live y the Hon ' rt, delivered by the Honorable W.J.adams said Superior Court, to the intent that the judgment is affirmed, further , tnat the the costs of the aorpeal in dollars, sum of Sixteen & seventy-f issue tnerefor. (SEaL) BSoWeeeeccnt CeeeeGeoEsecEeoe Bot Geos Gee obuUckeoOE Uk eee oS weil ynons ym duly served by the + Qn Sais { VLG Lal’ 2rd. That the defendant is iidebted t« on contract for medical services rendered to the family of the defendant at the request of defendant, and uuder contract with : A 4% : > ‘ . \. nav the defendant whereby the said defendant agreed to pay for said services, in the sum of $49.00 and interest on same from February 1lst,1925 until paid at the rate of six per cent per amuum. 4th. Tnat the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of v49.00 with interest at the rute of six per cent per annuum from the lst. day of february, 1922, until paid, with costs, the costs being $2.60. 5th. That the execution be issued to the Sheriff or other lawful officer cf Iredell County commanding him that out of the real estate property levied on, he satisfy the judgment aforesaid. or This the 26th day of February ,1924. > i.C. Moore Justice of Peace CECE eee CesEeee Cebeccle CEGEEEGE See Ge CeeCGeeEGsdeere Glee bEeECeEeEc eed r In the Suvericr Court Januery Term 1924 be heard before His Honcr W.F.Harding, Jury and being heard and the jury having ans- therefore ordered the defendant the sum July 19th,1921 and the Clerk. WF Harding Judge Presiding ade tess PHAR AMAA RMR Pt BUC Ber GESSEUCCCEecCegecg ee PR LR OND TS ALS 2 Ree oe wes eS Be CHE Gee No. 50 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1924 ickKnight Auto Company vs W.TeLyttle (1) What amount, if any, is defendant indebted to plaintiff on note? ans. $175.00 with interest from 19th day of July,1921 (2) Did the plaintiff agree with the defendant that if the MeXay plow didn't suit him cr didn't give satisfaction in every particular that tne plaintiff would take it back and deliver to the defendant an (liver plow, No. 7&--D. in place of the Mckay plow? ans. Yes (3) Did the plaintiff breach its said conutruct? ans. Yes (4) What damage, if any, is defendant to recover by reason of the breach? Anse $150.00 (5) Is the plaintiff the owner of he prope described in the complaint? anse No. (6) Does the defendant wrongful y withhold the thereof? ans. No. (7) What was the value of the property received in the claim and delivery ordered by the sheriff of Iredell county at the time the defendant executed and delivered to the said sher- iff and replevin bond? ans. $200.00 ogecacececacaccccaae North Carolina, Iredell County i.4.Morrison, soming _ uperior Court TITVALNO atm JUDGMENT on to be heard and being heard by the under~ ericr court of Iredell County on the 4th day same being the first Monday of said month. mmons in this action was served, on the ‘iefendants 1926, and that the plaintiff e day December, 1926, and sum certain, sume being due by said verified complaint, the iintiff in the sum of $220. December ,1920 until paid. 8, DeDeLittlejonn with interest there- annum until paid from the 2lst day of Dec- 7 rf 3 — 4 2 : s defendant pay the cost of this action to ’ this cour Yebruery,1924. J. Hartness C ew au wuc c6@Gce GGSGE eee GECSSECEGCEGEECEEGE Norty Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. Listers Agricultural Chemical Works ! vs R.L. Bradford and H.E,.Hedrick, trading and doing business under the firm and style name of Bradford & Hedrick, and J,A,. Davidson This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on Monday the 3rd, day of March, 1924, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and flefendants have settled their differences: It is ordered and adjudged that this cause be and the seme hereby non-suited and disméssed, and the plaintiff is adjudged to pay the costs. This the 3rd day of Merch, 1924, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superfor Court, SH Bt Met SH Set, ON ROR NINA Nortp, Carolina,| Iredell County. 4 In the Superior Court t ",P.MeLain and C.W.McLain and others vs. § FINAL REPORT OF tECEIVER Miller-McLain Supply Company { TO THE HONORABLE: SUPERIOR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY AND HIS HONOR, JUDGE B, F. LONG: John A, Scott,<dr.; appointed by the Court as successer to Dorman Thompson, Receiver, deceased, respectfully returns and shows to the Court the following report, in the nature of an account, infinal settlement, This report is taken from the records of Dorman Thompson, deceased, who had pretically finished the settlement of this estate prior to his death on Oct, end., 1925, end in order to cover the entire transaction, a detailed statement of the entire actount is submitted herewith, Money in Bank $163.99 To checks & cash in safe 924,335 To sale of mdse, & fictures 1856.27 To gale automobile ; 392,60 To collections of sundry accts, es Total receipts 64, Oct, 4th, 1918, CREDITED BY THE FOLLOWING DISBURSEMENTS: ’ Oct; 17th, 1919, R.V.Brewley, 8 $2.14 Oct, 2lat, 1918, Cash stamped onvelops 5,21 Oct, List, 1918, Saston Tuck, wages 5,21 Nov: 2nd? 1918; Ael.Milis, Stenographic work 3.10 Nov, 4th, 1918, 4.c.Selley, work in making - three copies of inventory and —— calculations of same 10,00 Nov, 30th, 1918, M.P.Alexander, Co. taxes. BB 50 Dec, Bec, Jan, Jan, Jan; Jen, Jan, Jan, 6th, 18th, ist, 1st, ord, ord, 4th, 6th, 1918; 1918, 1919, 1919, 1919, 1919, 1919, 1919, A.L,.Mills, Stenographic work R.V.Brawléy, stemped envelops A.L.Mills, Stenographic work BR, Lacy, State taxes T.D.Miller, rent The Landmark, notices L.F,Ervin, City Taxes for 1915-16-17-18 Expense items of receiver “,0,Turner, Atty. Detroit Scale Co, preferred account BALANCE FOR DISTRIBUTION CREDITED AS FOLLOWS: Jan, 6th, June llth, 1920, Dec,19th, 1922, 1919,°By payment of 25% aividend on claims to the amount of $6956.37 $ By payment of 25% dividend on claims th the amount of Sr 6956 e 357 By payment of 8% dividend on claims to the amount of v6956,37 Total distribution of dividends Balance on hands The Landmark, notice for receiver Credited by commissions to receiver Si on 94064,74, recetpts— 5” commissions on $3653.65 disbursements By premium receiver's bond J.A,Hartnessy C,S,C, costs Total Amount due receiver And the receiver hea asics that the Court shall ap receiver to be discharg This the 14th day of November, 1923, John A, Scott, x Receiver Miller-Welain Scupply Co, Sworn to and subscribed before me, This the 14th day of Nov., 1923, J. A?Hartness Clerk Superior Court, $2:50 1,07 75 14,41 29:97 3.30 184,79 45.95 200,00 60,00 1739,09 695,64 556,50 $15.60 ving filed the above r ; prove the same and shall onder tho ey ed and his bond released, order the Jr North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell Cgunty Before the Clerk J.H.Shuford, Plaintiff, vs JUDGMERT k.B.Summers and Wi.k.Mcduley, trading and doing business under the firm name and style of summers & McAuley, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on the 17th day of liarch 1924, before the undersigned Clerk of Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the summons in this action was issued on the end day of rebruary, 1924, the re=- turn date of said summons being on the 15th day of February, 1924, and was duly served on each of the defendants before the return date of said summons, and verified complaint was filed in the ac- tion on the 7th day of February, 1924, and that the defendants are justly indebted tc the plaintiff in the sum of 4309.56, together with interest thereon at the rate cf six per cent from the lst day of January, 1924, until paid and that said account is due on 4n account, being a stated and fixed smount, and that defendants h&éve failed to file an answer or demurrer to sa&id complaint: It is therefore ordered and adjudged thut the pleintiff recover judgment against the defendants for the sum of y309.56, together with interest thereon at the rate cf six per cent from the first day of January, 1924, until peid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the defendants by the Clerk of this Court. Yhis the 17th day of March, 1924. J.m Hartuess Cierk Superior court eecacceoousccacecacecaceccecace eacecececesceuacsecdecacececece North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County before the Clerk. Carolina Motor Company vs JUDGMENT Oscar R. Mills, C.4.Dearman, N.C.Covington,k.M.Rickert and 4.B.Lineberger ) ) ) ) ) ) ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court on the 17th day of March, 1924, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was issued on the 13th day of February, 1924, and the return date set forth in said summons being the 25th, day of said month, and thet same was served before the return date by wrsonal servise on the defendants, Oscar Kk. Mills, C.a.Dearman, N.O.Covington and k.il. Rickert, and was not served on the defendant, a.B.Lineberger, and that the plaintiff filed a verified complaint in said action on the 23rd day of #ebruary, 1924, and that the defendants are justly in- debted to the plaintiff in the sum of $276.51 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 2lst day of *ebrueary, 1924, until paid, and thet the said defendants have failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to said complaint within the time allowed by law: It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendants, Cscar i..Mills, C.o.Dearman, N.O.Covington and H.ii.R ckert, for the sum of 9276.51 together with interest thereon from the 2lst day of #ebruary, 1924, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annun, and tne costs of this action to be taxed a ainst the said defendants. this March 17th, 1924. J.A.Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County ecceoececeecece. eaoceacace cecacececacaacceceacaacece North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk. Claude Moose vs SJUDGCMESRBT H.&.Hoover This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on the 17th day of March ,1924, before tne undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the summons was duly issued in this action on the 4th day of February, 1924, and that 4 writ of Claim and delivery wes duly issued on said date in this action, and that return date us set APE § forth in said summons was on the 2lst day of “ebruary, 1924, and / that said summons and writ of claim and delivery was duly served on the defendant on the 9th, day of ebruary, 1924, and the prop- erty discribed in the complaint was duly seized and taked into the possession of the officer serving the said process, and the ~ game wus delivered and turned back to the defendant when he execu- a vel ted a good and solvent bond with Fred H. Conger and wife, +714) Conger, sureties thereon , in the sum of 9500.00 and that the# plaintiff,in the sum of $237.90 together with interest thereon ruary ,1925 until paid, said amount being due on 4 note and chat- tel mortgage, same being 4 stated and certain amount, and that the defeudant has failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to the complaint within twenty days ufter the return date as required by law: /\ at the rate of six per cent per sunum from the 28th day of seb- 1 it is, therefore, considered, ordered and udjuaged by the Court that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendant H.&.Hoover, and his bondsmen, fred H. Conger and wite, £116 Con-=- ger for the sum of 9237.90 and interest thereon at the rate of six per centper annum trom the 28th day of February, 1923 until paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Court against the defendant. It is further considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff have 4 specific lien on the personal property described in the complaint, and this judgment is hereby declared 4 specific lien thereon. It is further considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that if the defendant and his bondsmen fail and neglect to pay off and discharge this judgment, principal, interest and costs on or be- fore the 29th day of March, 1924, that a writ issue directing & ) nace Cyn D > > Nn Aer?) 7 the Sheriff or other lawful officer to take possession of the prop- erty described inthe complaint and deliver the same over to J.G, Lewis, who is hereby appointed a commissioner of this Court to sell gaid property, after advertising same according to law, at public auction, and apply the proceeds to the p&yment of this judgment and costs. This the 17th day of March, 1924. J.A.Hartness Clerk of tne Superior Court of Iredell County EGECEECEEEAEASGACELS CcGGSCCSGEGedaeeGe North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1924. G.L.Mcinignt and Mason H. McKnight, pardoners, trading and doing business under firm name of Mcknight Auto Co., OR DR 2 F Plaintiff REFERENCE vs H.H.Doggett & S. Moss, Pardoners, trading under the name of Doggett- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Moss Motor Co., & B.B.Doggett, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, W.F. Harding, Judge presiding, and it appearing to the court, that the parties hereto have agreed upon a reference of this cause; and it furtner appearing that W.D.Turner has been agreed upon as Referee to hear the evidence and report his findings in all matters now in controversity in this action, and each side reserving the right to have the question as to the sale and purcnase of the Delco-Light System passed upon by the jury and oral evidence introduced be@bre the jury upon that question. It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that this cause be, and it is hereby referred to Hon. W.D.Qurner as Referee, to hear said cause and make his findings of facts and conclusions of the law, and report the same to the court as provided for consent references. Ana it is further ordered that either side shall have the right to have the question as to the sale or our chase of the Delco-Light system passed upon by tne jury and orel evidence offered upon this question, in the event that either side shall desire to appeal from the findings of the Referee upon this question, to-wit: the sale or purchase of the lelco Light question. W.F Harding Judge Presiding Consented to by %.V.Turlingt & Grier & Grier Tttorneys for Mcxnignt Auto Co. Clyde Hoey & Long & Jurney Attorneys for Yogrett-loss Mctor Co. G@AGEGEEACAGE CEOECECEE CHEE GAAABAGEECSE ECAEAASESEAES North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell Ccunty March 4th, 1924. G.L.McKnight and ) Mason Mcknight, Partners, ) Trading and Doing Business ) Under the Firm Name and style ) mE ea! of McKnight Auto Company ERNS OF COMPROMISE vs H.H.Doggett and 5.Moss, ) Partners, trading and doing ) business under the firm name ) and style of Doggett-Moss ) Motor Company and B.B.Doggett ) The parties to this suit have agreed upon & complete and full settlement of all matters in controversy in the complaint and all differences between them of every kind and character up to and including this date, said settlement being 4s follows: 1. The defendants to pay the plaintiff the sum of $1500 cash, and the plaintiff to surrender to the defendants the uncashed check for $122.97. ll. The defendants to surrender to the plaintiff a note for $400 and to receipt ell bills or accounts against the plaintiffs or either of them. 111. Defendants to pay the taxes of about $245.00 for the year 1922, EV. The defendants to pay the costs of this action prior to the hearing today, and for this hearing each side to pay their own wit- nesses and the costs connected therewith, and each side to pay one-half of the referee's and stenographer's fees. V. The plaintiff to have the Genco lighting system, tor and trailer, which is now on the farm of Mr. Mcknight, gasOline engine. The above represents complete settlement of any and 411 claims or demands of any character whatsoever existing or arising in behalf of either the plaintiff or defendants against the cther in this mat- ter, or any other mutter up to and including this date. In testimony whereof tne counsel representing each side have hereunto set tneir hands, this the 4th day of Murch, 1924. zeb V. Turlington Grier & Grier attys for Plaintiff Clyde i. Hoey Long & Jurney ittys for Defendants North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredell County. Before the Clerk, JUDGMENT { ay 3 t t } R, A. Jones This cause coming tc be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on the 3lst day of March, 1924, and it appearing to the Court that the summons was duly issued by the Clerk of this Court in this action on the 2lst day of February, 1924, and that a writ of Clain and Delivery was duly issued in this action on said date, and that the return date set forth in said summons was on the 14th day of March, 1924, and the time for the plaintiff to file his complaint was exéended to the 7th day of March, 1924, by the Court, and the defendant was allowed twenty days after said 7th day of March, 1924, to file en enswer or demur, and that said summons and writ of clain and delivery were served on the defendant by personal service on the 25th day of February, 1924, and the personal property described in the said writ of claim and delivery was taken from the defendant and in his possession of the officer on serving said writ, and said property was delivered and turned back to the defendant when’ he executed a good and solvent replevy bond in the sum of $1000.00 with lula R. Jones as surety thereon, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in this action on the 7th day of March, 1924, end-that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of 165,00 ore with interest thereon from the 12th day of Jenuary, 1925, until paid at the rate of six pers cent per annum, and that said amount is due on a note and chattel mortgage, same being a certain and stated amount, and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to the complaint as required by law and the order in this cause: It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendant, R. A; Jones, end his bondsmen, Lula R, Jones, for the sum of $165.00 together with interest thereon from the 12th. day of Jenuery » 1923 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and the costs of this action to be taxed against said defendents. It is further considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff have a specific lein on the personal property described in the complaint, and this judgment is hereby declared a specific lien thereon. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that 1f the defendant and his bondsman fail and neglect to pay off and discharge this judgment pememees interest and costs on or before the 12th day of April, {9 4, that a writ issue directing the Sheriff or other lawful officer of Iredell County to take possession of the said personal property described in said complaint fired in this action and deliver the same over to the plaintiff to sell under his chattel mortrare after advertising same according to law, and apply the proceeds to the payment of this judgment and costs, This the 3lst day of March, 1924, J. A. Hartness Tierk or the Superior Court of Iredell County, N.C, MONDAY , MAY 19 th oe) 1924 e North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | May Term, 1924, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and county aforesaid, on the llth Monday after the lst Monday in March, 1924, the same being the 19th day of May 1924, , when and where His Honor, W, F, Harding, Judge Presiding, is present and presiding in the 15th Judicial District of North Carolina, and Hon, Zeb, V. Long, Solicitor is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, fA, P. Alexander, the high Sheriff of Tredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term of Superior Court, to-wit: The following were drawn and sworn as grand jurors for the term; T.A.Reid, J.Hugh Bryant, C.S,Bass rT Tv * »nae ur WwW 1 « ™ a In ¢ ™" TY ~ > LR. Burgess, W.A,Massey, E,D,Oliphant, E.D,Brady, LeRoy Crawford, WR.Byfors, J.E.Blackwelder, L.M.“aither, H.F.Cloer, C.P. Munday, H.J,Collins, G,.W,Rankin, J.W.Neel, R.C,Jenkins, W.H. Johnson, A. Gunn. J.Hugh Bryant was appointed and sworn as foreman of 4 Ax Jury. sworn as officer in charge of the jury. W.L.Smith, E.T.Ayers, Lem Miller and M.W.Shaw were returned w " not to be found in the county. R.A.Brawley, M.H,arwell, John lL. Alexander and J.Marshall Deaton were excused for reasonable causes. The following were returned and sworn as petty jurors 5 O.L.Smith, R.C.Grose, Foy A. Deal, H.S. Hair, E.C.Plyler, J.S.Ostwalt, F.M.“agner and A.L.Sims, The following were sworn as talis jurors for the week; J.He aii Myllis, E.C,Redman, J.lL.Abernathy, W.S.Page, W.A.Moore, F.H.Goodin, D.E.Myers, R.B.arker, W.A.Dry, C,A.Brady, No, 4 State VS Tomas Stewart No. 5 State vs Ivey Killian Fatty Sisk Vernon Eads Jesse Smith Grudger Barns Ralph Hefner No, 64 State vs Valter Smith 8 os ae et pee pe St OE RE EE Ee Oe Monday, May 19th., 1924, RESISTING AN OFFICER, Upon motion of the Solicitor, it is ordered Court that this case be Nol Prosed With Leave. by CAR BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING 1 APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, : Continued under former order, y J aarTrTens HIGH , PPT 1 PPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, efendant appeared and showed good behavior, is ordered by the Court that the case be continued xr former order, (C¢ $aq0 be a ~% 4 Caplas. It is ordered that execution be issued against surety’ for bond on the judgment absolute. in this case, BEHAVIOR a4 i ) aii Jake Defendant appeared and showed good behavior. Continued wnde e , a continue nder former order, HOUSE BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING, si Defendant comes into open Court and enters a plea , c T¢er na hareac P of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the lafandan is ay S 4 s defendant, alter Smith be imprisoned_in the common AG44 Ol Iredell Younty for a term of FOUR YEARS, and assigned to work on the public roads od said county for said period with felon stripes. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON IN EACH CASE, Defendant comes into.open Court and through his counsel enters a plea of not guilty in each Case. The following jurors.were empannelled for their verdict; R.C.Grose, "ay A Deal, H;S,Hair, E.C. Plyler, J.5.Ostwalt, F,M,Wagmer, A.L.Sims, J.H.Mullis, E.C. Hedman, W.5,Pagell,A,Moore and D,E,Myers, After hearing all the evidence and the arguments of the counsel for the State and defendant case was continued over to Tuesday May 20th, This # | is Honorable Court adjourns until Tuesday morming, May 20th.» 1924, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, This Tuesday, May 20th., 1924, Honorable Court convened Tuesday,morning, May 20th., 1924, at 9:30 o'clock, A. M,, for the dispatch of business, Nos, 53 and 60 State vs R. O. Kyles 2 No. state vs Lennie Will4ems Nos, 24 and 25 State vs i Jemes Hager No, 5&2 State vs Raleigh Miller No, 65 State vs Earl Eccles No, 58 State vs Louis Johnson GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS Continued to next term of Court by consent LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant pleads not guilty, Jury No. 2 being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of larceny and receiving as charged in the bill of indict- ment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court thet the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX MONTHS, and assigned to work 6n the public roads of said county for said period, SSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON IN EACH CASE, Continued over from Manday, “ay 19th. The jury find for their verdict that the defendant is guilty of assault with deadly weapon in each of the the two cases, Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspended in each of the cases on payment of the cost, SN ee ee TE 9 MURDER, The defendant, Raleigh Miller tenders to the Solicitor a plea of not guilty of murder in the first degree, guilty of murder in the second degree which plea the Solicitor for the State accepts, thereupon, the defendant pleads not guilty of murder in the first degree and pleads guilty of murder in the second degree being in open Court and represented by counsel, W.D, Turner and R,T, Weatherman, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant, Raleigh Miller be imprisoned in the State Prison at Raleigh, North’ Carolina for term of ELEVEN YEARS at hard labor. OE TE EE pe ES Ee Se ee oO STORE BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant waives bill through his counsel in open Court and tehders a plea of guilty,of larceny of property under the value of 20,00 and guilty of forcible trespass. It appearing to the Court from all the evidence that the defendant at the time the crime was committed was not quite sixteen years of age, defendant having plead guilty through his counsel, this case is remanded to the Juvenile Court fo the end that the law in regard to such cases may be carried out, conditioned upon the defendant paying the cost, SCI De IE I pe oes ee TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR FOR PURPOSE OF SALE, Defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel enters a plea of guilty of Trans por= ing and possessing liquor as charged in the bill of indictment. oe ge eee aT eo oe TUESDAY, MAY 20th,, 1924, e $9 ; State ASSAULT ON HIS WIFE, vs Defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads Lester Byers sass of a simple assault, which plea the Solicitor fop he State accepts and defendant pleads guilty. Upon the recommendation of the Solicitor judgment is suspended upon the payment of the cost, No, 61 State VS Yames Gray HIGHWAY ROBBERY DEFENDANT comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of ONE YEAR, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, No, 635 State vs sohn Glenn BIGAMY, Defendant in open Court enters a plea of guilty of bigamy as charged in the bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell C e term of ,ONE YEAR, and assigned to work at>ené4iote j-end—infionm of said county for said period, PE IE es Se ee EE eo No. 59 State HIGHWAY ROBBERY, vs Defendant pleads not guilty, Jury No. 1 after Abe Dalton being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of Highway Robbery as charged in the bill of indictment. BAR ASSOCIATION ON THE DEATH CHIEF JUSTICE WALTER CLARK The death of Chief Justice Walter Clark, of the Supreme Court of Nort, Carolina, on the 19th day of May, 1924, is epochal in the Judicial history of the state, From the time he entered the Confederate Army and became a Lieutenant-Colonel, at the age of seventeen, the youngest officer of this rank in either army, until his death, his talents were used in public service for his state, which he loved so well, His career on the Superior and Supreme Court Benches for the past forty years thoroughly demonstarted his great ability, profound knowledge of the law and scholarly attainments. He was endowed with an intellect that commanded the respect and admiration of the best minds and thinkers, of the-age and his legal opinions werd always strong, vigorous and clear and were recognized and cited as authority in the & highest courts of the land, During his long life, on and off the bench, he was a prodigious worker, drinking deep from the fountain of knowledge in sympathetic understanding with the real problems of humanity, which gave him his power and influence in determining all great questions that affected the welfare of the people, state and nation, With it all; » he was a progressive, fearless and far-sighted statesman, always being Tuesday, May 20th., 1924, in the vanguard in important, progressive movements, refusing to stand by precedents of law, when they handicapped such movements, which was best evidenced by the fact that many of his importent dissenting opinions have since become law, either through legislation or judicial determination. WHEREAS, the funeral of the late Chief Justice Walter Clark is held to-day at Raleigh, N.C.: Ana Whereas, the Bar of Iredell County desires to show 4ts respects and reverence for his life and work: Therefore, be it resolved by the Bar Association of Iredell County, in meeting assembled, with the consent and approval of eau: Ww. F, Harding, presiding Judge at the present term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, that the Court do now adjouwn until Wednesday, May 2lst., out of respect to his memory." The resolution of the Bar at Statesville, North Carolina relates to the death of Chief Justice Walter Clark of the Supreme Court of the State. It is ordered that said resolution be spread upon the minutes of this Court and that this Court adjourn now at the time of the funeral until Wednesday morning, May 2lst., 1924, at 9:50 a'clock, A.M., out of respect to the memory of Chief Justice Walter Clark, ti blu F, Judge Presiding and holfing the Courts of the 15th Judicial Astrict of North Carolina, TUESDAY, MAY 20th,, 1924, No. 89 ; State ASSAULT ON HIS WIFE, vs Defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads Lester Byers truilty of a simple assault, which plea the Solicitor fop tne State accepts and defendant pleads guilty. Upon the recommendation of the Solicitor judgment is suspended upon the payment of the cost, HIGHWAY ROBBERY DEFENDANT comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of ONE YEAR, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, No, 63 State vs John Glenn BIGAMY, Defendant in open Court enters a plea of guilty of bigamy as charged in the bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County f ONE YEAR, and assigned to work at : a , m of said county for said period, No. 59 State HIGHWAY ROBBERY, vs Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 after Abe Dalton being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of Highway Robbery as charged in the bill of indictment. . ASSOCIATION ON THE DEATH TICE WALTER CLARK The death of Chief Justice Walter Clark, of the Supreme Court of Nort, Carolina, on the 19th day of May, 1924, 1s epochal in the Judicial history of the state, From the time he entered the Confederate Army and became a Lieutenant-Colonel, at the age of seventeen, the youngest officer of this rank in either army, until his death, his talents were used in public service for his state, which he loved so well, His career on the Superior and Supreme Court Benches for the past forty years thoroughly demonstarted his great ability, profound knowledge of the law and scholarly attainments, He was endowed with an intellect that commanded the respect and admiration of the best minds and thinkers, of the age and'his legal opinions were always strong, vigorous and clear and were recognized and cited as authority in the & highest courts of the land, During his long life, on and off the bench, he was a prodigious worker, drinking deep from the fountain of knowledge in sympathetic understanding with the real problems of humanity, which gave him his power and influence in determining all great questions that affected the welfare of the people, state and nation. With it all, he was a progressive, fearless and far-sighted statesman, always being Tuesday, May 20th,, 1924, in the vanguard in important, progressive movements, refusing to stand by precedents of law, when they handicapped such movements, which was best evidenced by the fact that many of his important dissenting opinions have since become law, either through legislation or judicial determination, WHEREAS, the funeral of the late Chief Justice Walter Clark is held to-day at Raleigh, N.C.: Ana Whereas, the Bar of Iredell County desires to show 4ts respects and reverence for his life and work: Therefore, be it resolved by the Bar Association of Iredell County, in meeting assembled, with the consent and approval of Hon, W. F, Harding, presiding Judge at the present term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, that the Court do now adjourn until Wednesday, May 2lst., out of respect to his memory," The resolution of the Bar at Statesville, North Carolina relates to the death of Chief Justice Walter Clark of the Supreme Court of the State, It 1s ordered that said resolution be spread upon the minutes of this Court and that this Court adjourn now at the time of the funeral until Wednesday morning, May 2lst., 1924, ot 9:50 é'clock, A.M., out of respect to the memory of Chief Justice Walter Clark, Judge Presiding and holfiing the Courts of the 15th Judicial IAstrict of North Carolina, Wednesday, May 21lst., 1924, —— Wednesday, May 2lst., 1924. This Honorable Court convened Wednesday morning, at 9:30 1 "REIGHT \.R BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING o'clock, A.M., on bhe 21st day of May, 1924, for the dispatch of business, FR ie. eee ein his counsel tenders a plea of guilty of forcible trespass and noy guilty of freight car preaking larceny and receiving which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State and the Solicitor recommends that defendant be fined $100, ond the cost of this action, Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court on recommendation of the Solicitor that the defendant pay a fine of $100, end the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. 5 shies” UNLAWFULLY REMOVING CROPS FROM THE LANDS OF THE vs LANDLORD, B. A, Stilwell Defendant pleads not guilty as charged in the bill of indictment. Jury No, 1 after being duly sworn end empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant not guilty of vnkawfully remov- ing crops from the lands of his landlord, TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR FOR PURPOSE OF SALE . 68 and 72 It appearing to the Court that the defendant plead S guilty of transporting and possessing liquor for the 2 purpose of sale on Tuesday, May 20th., therefore, R. L. Caldwell It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the conmon jail of Tredeil County for © term of FOTR MONTHS, and pay! the cost of this action, with authority to’ the County Conmissioners to work on the public roads of the-county,: if upon the: examination of the County Physician he is not in’ such condition as will jeopardize his health. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON IN TWO CASES, By agreement the two charges is consolidated for trial, Defendant plead not guilty of the indictment of which he stands charged in each of the cases, Jury No. 1] uftme being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict, After all the evidence was taken and the arguments by counsel on each side, case continued over to 7H s~Aax Wac 00.4 mursday, May ¢ 1 Louis Johnson DE RE RE I I oe oat ee thw bd ne STORE BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING, 7 ab] Defendant enters a plea of guilty of larceny and This Honorable receiving as charged in the bill of indictment but not Se ee ee guilty as to the charge of Store breaking as charged morning, M8y <oNGe, +ve%s in the bill of indictment, The Solicitor after putting on his evidence takes a nol pros as to the charge of store breaking. ' Gs Judge Presiding 15 Judicial District No, 55 State vs Marvin Clark OMAR wail G LARCENY AND RECEIVING, mn comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty of store breaking iarcény-and receiving as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned ig the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SOeak MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, ‘ ‘aoe S3REAKIN ae m - ne dar EBRE efe uLl P No. 28 State vs Robert Troutman CAR BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING, The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel tenders a plea of guilty of forcible trespass which plea the Solicitor for the State accepts and recommends that the defendant be fined wlL00, and the cost of this action. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that upon recommendation of the Solicitor that the defendant be fined $100, and the cost of this action. No. 46 State LARCENY AND RECEIVING, vs The defendant in open Court tenders a plea of Robert Troutman forcible trespass which the Solicitor for the State accepts and recommends that judgment be suspended on payment of the cost, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that on recommendation of the Solicitor that’ judgment be suspended on the Payment of the cost, THURSDAY, May 22nd,, 1924, This Honorable Court convened Thursday morning, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., on May 22nd,, 1924, for the dispatch of business, Nos, 68 and 72 ; State ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON IN TWO CASES vs Continued over from Wednesday, May 2ist, R. L. Caldwell Jury found for their verdict that the defendant is guilty of assault with deadly weapon in each case as charged in the bill of indictment, Case continued to May 27th for further orders, No, 57 State GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS ve... Continued to August Term, 1924, H.eFlmer Johnston No, 71 State GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS vs Capias and continued M.M. Johnston No. 67 State vs M. R. Aldridge FORGERY. Defendant comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty as charged in three bills of indictment charging forgery. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued with leave to Solicitor to pray judgment at any time within two years, EE OE pe et A ee FORCIBLE TRESPASS Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa instanter and Yapias instanter. Troutman FORGERY Defendant in open Court enters a plea of guilty of forgery as charged in the bill of indicément. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued for two years on payment of the cost and on the further condition that the defendant appear at each November and May Terms for said two years to show good behavior and that he has re-imbursed his father for the money hés father had paid out on him, Combs Se et ee et oe pee No, 66 State LARCENY AND RECEIVING, vs It appearing to the Court that the defendant James edman plead guilty to larceny and receiving on Wednedday, May Clst., therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX MONTHS, and assigned to work on thé public roads of said county for said period, No a & State Vv Ab Q e Dalton Thursday, May 22nd., 1924. FORGERY Defendant comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty of forgery as charged in the bill of indictment. Let the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of ONE YEAR, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period and pay the cost of this action, I pS ON OC FORGERY Defendant pleads guilty forgery as charged in the bill of indcitment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued ypon payment of the cost in this action, 59 HIGHWAY ROBBERY Defendant moves an arrest of judgment on the verdick, lotion allowed, The defendant is discharged on the verdict and the state appeals, Notice waived in open Court.” By consent the State is allowed Sixby days in which to serve case on appeal, Defendant is alloved Thirty days after such service to file exceptions or counter case, Defendant through his counsel comes into oven Court in his own person and pleads guilty of an assault on the person of E,L. Pierce, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant, Abe Dalton pay a fine of $25,00 and the cost of this action. t I ‘ { { t ‘ : { } : 4 j { : ‘ Norty Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County, | May Term, Hon. 1924, W.F,Harding, Judge Presiding:- We, the Grand Jury, beg leave to submit our report as follows:- We acted upon all bills sent before us and made due return of the same to the Courbd. We visited the County Jail and found three white males, two colored male prisoners, The prisoners all reported that they were well fed and properly cared for, We found the jail in a sanitary condition, We visited the various offices in the Court House and found all offices in good condition and all records properly cared for, We found that the recommendations made by the January Term Grand Jury for a book case to care for the law books, - Also the recommendation for extra shelves in the Clerks office had not been carried out, We visited the County home by committee and found 12 white male, 15 white females, 7 colored males‘ and 7 colored females inmates, Total number inmates being 41. Ye found the inmates well cared for in every particular, and no complaint as to management. We found the home in a sanitary condition, wr iy, We recommendto the County Commissioners that they authorize Perry, the keeper, to have some concrete work and some plastering done that is badly needed, : May 22 ’ ™ o - te Thursday, May 2 nd,, 1924, oe F May 26th., 1924, 3 ty, Carolina In the Superior Court We recommend that the County Commissioners have the walls of Werke, rt . : 4 ~ Cain WY a , 4 4 se * r 7 a the entire Court House painted and the wood work varnished, Iredel1 County. | May Term, 1924, Second week, Babes visited the Chain Gang by committee and found nine white nn ¢ C a 7} A Tv; * and 19 colored men, All were well fed and cared for and no complaint This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at as to treatment, We found the camp in a sanitary condition, 10:00 o'clock, 4.M., Monday morning, May 26th,, 1924, when and J, Hugh Bryant YO @? - * ' ™ vt > s foreman where His Honor, W. F, Harding, Judge Presiding end holding the Courts in the 15th Judicial District of Nort}, Carolina, is present and presiding, this the second week for Civil cases at May lerm, 1924, Grand Jury having made their report and finished } P, Alexander, the High Sheriff of Tredell County, North die . jurors, it is ordered by the Court that they be discharged ' oe ’ * : > Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week In the Superior Court, for civil cases, bo-wit: J,F,Pharr, J.L.Browm, T.H.Sloan, J.A.Day, January Term, 1924 M,A,Deaton, W,G,Lentz, C,.V,Collins, C.E,Ludwig, M,L.Baker, A,N. Bridges, Sam Holmes, I.F.Rimmer, Cowles Bristol, T.I.Eller, Walter Sloop, A.M,Shaver, W.P, Teeter, W.R. Cornelius, T.0,Ervin, W.P.Hager, 0,A,Murdock, J.G,Miller, The following returned were returned not to be found in the County; B.L.Moore and W.S.Bell. The following m ae were excused by the Court for lawful excuses; H.Sloan, M.A.Deaton, term of the Court and being heard, Cowles Bristol and W,P, Teeter, that the plaintiff and No. 98 Nort, Carolina, | In the Superior Court, eement wherein and whereby tne f Iredell County. | May Term, 1924, avtanat, ry F 5 2 ark 2 + 3 * + 5 extension < .ime which to deliver the lumber attached and made apart of the complaint, all as set Alma Smith agreement between the parties, ici +H ara ft’ “a ~* y ~ * MAGrOLONG, Ct dered and adjudged upon motion of J. H, Smith 2° rier, Attorneys for plaintiff, that this action be, and the , Lst: Q, Has the plaintiff been a.resident of the State ‘ : her sr Aiam?4 hereby dismissed » and that the cost be taxed against the of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the starting defendant, of this action ? W. F, Harding Judge Yresiding, end, Q. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint 7 A. Yes. This Honorable Coyp nS . ; i : ourt adjourns until Monday morning, May ard, Q. 4ave the plaintiff and defendant lived setarate 26th., 1924, at|Q:00 o'clock, A.M . , se and apart for more then five years prior to the commencement of r this action, as alleged in the complaint 7 rf ‘Gt | Judge Presiding and holding Courts in the 15th Judicial Distri of North Carolina, A. Yes UJ Monday, May 26th., 1024, No.98 _ Nortpn Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County, May Term, 1924, Alma Smith vs JUDGMENT? J. H, Smith This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Supertior Court before His Honor, W, F, Harding, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the following issues having been submitted to the jury: "Ist: Q, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the starting of this action ? ' and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint ? A. Yes,” Ane ai d fae e ; ni 1 « aid issues having been answered by the jury in the affirma*ive: It is therefore ordered adjudged and decreed that the bonds of mo ey af 1iOny ner Pat, oa a ti. i + * imony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, + ra } hereby dissolved and an absolute divorce granted, We. F. Harding Judge Presiding. This Honorable Court adjourns until Tuesday morning, May 27the, 1924, at 9:30 o'clock, fp icg, Judge +residing and hofding the Courts of the 15th JuAicial District, Tuesday, May 27th,, 1924, This Honorable Court convened @ecording= ta adjournment Tuesday morning, May 27th., 1924, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. No. 102 Tropical Paint &.011 Co.j J. C. Henley witness for the plaintiff VS {| was called and failed, Judgment Nisi R, A. Jones { Sci Fa and instanter Capias. On motion | of the plaintiff Capias to issue to next { term. ‘Bond fixed at $200, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, It appearing to the Court that the defendant was found guilty of an assault with deadly weapon to-wit an automobile by wéerdict of a jury on Var Thursday, May 2ist., 1924, at and during this term of Court, therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $500. and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. No. 68 State vs ERE. L. Caldwell No, 72 State vs 9° hie ASSAUBT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, It appearing to the Cotrt that this case was consolidated with No. 68 for trial and the defendant was found guilty of an assault with deadly weapon, to-wit; and automobile by verdict of a jury on Thursday, May 2lst,, 1924, at and during this term of Court, therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment is continued on payment of the costs and defendant appear here at the January and May Terms of Iredell Superior Court for one year to show good behavior and that he has not operated an automobile during that time, Dp iy Caldwell ( f f f : I ' j t ‘ I { { It is ordered in all cases that have been disposed of in this Court, and in all cases where the defendant has been called and failed to appear and forfeiture entered of record in which the sheriff or other officer of this County has any intoxicating liquors under the prohibition statute of this state, that it shall be destroyed immediately upon the adjournment of this Court by pouring same into the sewer, This Honorable Court adjourns until Wednesday morning, May 28th,, 1924, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M, udge of 15th WEDNESDAY, May 28th,, 1924, This Honorable Court convened Wednesday morning May 28th °?3 1924,: at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. No. 58 State vs Louis Johnson No. 70 State vs Cora Bratcher John Glenn OE Ce a OTM NE eT a a CN TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR, Judgement having heretofore been pronounced 4@ this term adjudging that the defendant be eénfined if the county jail of Iredell County for a term of four months, to be assigned to work on the public roads of Tredell County, unless the County Physician shall eee that it is detrimental to his health and life, and to pay the costs; and it eppearing t defendant be confined in the county 32 zs arte ae 7 sentence has expired until the costs has been paid, or until otherwise discharged, according to law, , FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY. On motion of the Solicitor, it is ordered b Court that this case of fornification and aos against said defendants be nol prosed, the said Cora Bratcher after learning that the said John Glenn was married and had a living wife at once left the said defendant John Glenn. state VS E.%.Gay: It is agreed by the Solicitor representing the state and Buren Jurney,4“sq. representing the county of Iredell, and J.L.Jones, Esq. and Z.V.Turlington, ssq., attorneys for the claimants that the above entitled cause was on the docket regularly of the Kecorder's Court that motion was made by the climants through coulsen that the auto- mobile seized by the officers in this cause be returned to them 48 their property. Upon the hearing said claimants demanded a jury trial, the kecorder's Court of Mooresville having no authority to draw a jury. ‘the cause was gent up to this court by the kecorder of Mooresville kKecorder's Court, to be heard before a jury to deter- mine the rights of the claimants and the rights of the State of North Carolina in this property. at this triel and at this time the claimants through their counsel move the Court to deliver to them the automobile, claiming it as their property, and the Court with the consent of all parties submits to the jury the following issues “Are J.H.Norman and the Motor sales and Service Company the owners of the automobile in controversy,” and such other issues 48 may arise after the evidence nas been concluded. North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term,1924. — ISSUES 4.G. Gay ) (1) Was the car in controversy ,seized by the officer used in transporting liquor at the time of the seizure? Ans: No (2) Was J.H.Norman, the claimant, the owner of said auto- mobile at the time of said seizure? Ans. Yes. (3) Did the climant, J.H.Norman, have knowledge and consent that the car was being used in transporting liquor in voilation of the prohibition laws of the state? ans. No. (4) What amount, if any,was J.tui.Norman indebted to the Motor Sales & Service Vompeny at the time of the seizure of ‘the automobile by virtue of the mortgage and note offered in evidence? 4nS8 6 WEDNESDAY, May 28th,, 1924, This Honorable Court convened Wednesday morning, May 28th., 1924,:at 9:50 o'clock, A.M, No, 58 State vs Louis Johnson No. 70 State vs 4 Cora Bratcher 4} John Glenn 4 ) ) 4 4 TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR, Judgement having heretofore been pronounced dur this term adjudging that the defendant be confined in the county jail of Iredell County for a term of four months, to be assigned to work on the public roads of Tredell County, unless the Gounty Physicien shell determine that it is detrimental to his health and life, and to pay the costs; end it ap earing that the defendant be confined in the county jail after the sentence has expired until the costs has been paid, or until otherwise discharged, according to law, FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY. On motion of the Solicitor, it is ordered by the Court that this case of fornification and adultry against said defendants be nol prosed, the said Cora Bratcher after learning that the said John Glenn was married and had a living wife at once left the said defendant John Glenn. State VS E£.G.Gay: It is agreed by the Solicitor representing the state amd Buren Jurney,4sq. representing the county of Iredell, and J.L.Jones, Esq. and Z.V.Turlington, ssq., attorneys for the claimants that the above entitled cause was on the docket regularly of the Kecorder'’s Court that motion was made by the climants through coulsen that the auto- mobile seized by the officers in this cause be returned to them as their property. Upon the hearing said claimants demanded a jury trial, the kecorder'’s Court of Mooresville having no authority to draw a jury. ‘the cause was sent up to this court by the kecorder of Mooresville kecorder’s Court, to be heard before a jury to deter- mine the rights of the claimarits and the rights of the State of North Carolina in this property. at this trial and at this time the claimants through their counsel move the Court to deliver to them the automobile, claiming it as their property, and the Court with the consent of all parties submits to the jury the following issues "Are J.H.Ncrman and the Motor sales and service Company the owners of the automobile in controversy,” and such other issues a8 may arise after the evidence has been concluded. North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term,1924. ) State ISSUES #.G. bay ) (1) Was the car in controversy ,seized by the officer used in transporting liquor at the time of the seizure? ans: No (2) Was J.H.Norman, the claimant, the owner of said auto- mobile at the time of said seizure? Ans. Yes. (3) Did the climant, J.H.Norman, have knowledge and consent that the car was being used in transporting liquor in voilation of the prohibition laws of the state? ans. No. (4) What amount, if any,was J.iieNorman indebted to the Motor Sales & Service Company at the time of the seizure of ‘the automobile by virtue of the mortgage and note offered in evidence? ansi North Carolina, In the Superior Court Irédell County May Term,1924. State ' | vs IN THE MATTER OF ONE PAIGE AUTOMOBILE E.G. Gay This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor W./'.Harding and a jury and the Jury having answered the issues submitted as follows: l- Was the car in controversy,seized by the officer used in the transporting of liquor at the time of the seizure? Ans. No. 2- Was J.H.Norman, the claimant, the owner of said automobile at the time of the seizure? Ans. Yes 3 - Did the claimant,J.H.Norman,have knowledge and consent that the car was being used in transporting liquor in violation of the pro- hibition laws of this state? ans. - No. It IS HEREBY ORDERED,ADJUDGED AND DECREED that claimant J.H.Nor- man shall have the possession of said Yaige sutomobkle and the au- thorities of the City of mooresville are hereby ordered to turn over to gaid J.H.Norman with out cost to him the said paige automobile now in their custody. this the 29th day of May 1924. a.” Harding Judge Presiding CESESCEILCE GECEL EGS GGCUEEEE Gu CCE GE GE GE No. 107 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term,1924. W.A.Dry Administrator of P.W, Kagle, JUDGMENT D.dJ,Eagle,and G.B.White, 1.M.Rickert,nx.5.Dovson, 7.J. Weber and W.W.Holland,vrustees for i ) W.W.Hol d,administrator of j j i I Snow Creek Methodist Church i This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term of Court, before His Honor,W.F.Harding, and a jury, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendants have adjusted their dif- ferences out of court, It is thereupon ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendants the sum of $306,83, with interest from the 26th day of May, 1924 until paid. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay one-half the costs of thig action and the defendant one-half. a.) Harding dudge Presiding By consent‘ dann A. Scott, dr. Attorney for *ieinti W.D.Turner Hayden Bork Grjer & Grier Attorneys for Defendants aceececacecaccacaacceceaccea ececaacacaccacecaccaceacacee No. 101 Statesville Oil Co. | vs { ISSUES Leie Whitner j Is defendant indebted to plaintiff and if so, in what Ans. $253.10 with interest from sept. 1,1922 at six per cent. me, 10 / North Carolina In the Superior: Court, ’ Iredell County. May verm 1924 Jas. ¥.Mlanigan,trading and doing business under the firm nane and style of Statesville O11 Company JUDGMENT vs Loyd A. Whitner and being heard before Tig cause coming on to be heard, en His Honor, W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues in favor of the plaintiff and against the de- fendants as set out in the record: “ It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover judgment against the defendant for the sum of $253.10, together with interest thereon at the rate of six percent per annum from the ist day of September,1922, untél paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed against said defendant. “.F Ho yg ing Judge Presiding EEGEGEGEEEEEECECEEEEEAGE GESSGEAGESEEEEEEE CHE ESCES No. 96 orth Caroline, In the Superior Court, Iredell County | Mey Term 1924 4lma “mith vs JH Smith a This cause coming on to be heard at this ¢ Superior Court is term of afore Hie | c Ww Up ‘~ ; 1 234 before His Honor, W.i.Harding, Judge Presiding and a jury and the fol- lowing issues having been submitted to the jury: wv Q . re 7 \~ “ 2 lsts Q. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North ‘ $ Pn ~ >= >: je : . Carolina for more than five years prior to the starting of this ac- tion? 2nd: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the complaint? a “as } * 3rd: Q. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and fo ) } ‘ 6 £ apart for more than five years prior to the commencement of this ac~ tion as alleged in the complaint?" and all of said ussues having been answered by the jury in the affirmative: ane Feeres ore ordered adjudged and decreed that the ponds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be , and the same are hereby dissolved and an absolute divorce granted, © W. Harding Judge Presiding @AGGGECIEGAIAIEGACEESEGAG CGCREGdEAGIGa eeceeacaceae Wo. 124 North Caroline, In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term,1924 Elizabeth garlton Prindell versus o.D-Prindell,alias allan Dewan,alias Alan DeWann Did the defendant have a living wife at the time of his marriage to the plaintiff as alleged? Answer: Yes we #27 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term,1924 Elizebeth Carlton Prindell vs A.D.Prindell,alias JUDGMENT Slan Dewann, alias alan DeWann This cause coming on to be heard before His Hon. WF. Harding, Judge and @ Jury at the May Term of the Court: And the Jury having answered the issue in favor of the plaintiff and as against the defendant, as follows: "Did the defendant have 4 living wife at the time of, his marriage to the plaintiff es alleged? ans. Yes.” It is thereupon ordered,considered and adjudged that the mar- riage of the plaintiff and defendant be and the same is hereby de- cleared annuled and void from the beginning and the plaintiff is de- clared free and dissolved from any and all obligations growing out of said ceremony. It is further ordered that the plaintiff be permitted to resume her maiden name. W.F Hard ing Judge Presiding ececavecaaeccaceccaces eecececacacaaacaceae wa siVe North Carolina I lina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term,1924. Peerless Sweater Mills vs k ENT ia oe i el oe 1 C.S.daffee and li.Goldlang,trading jj and doing business under the firm jf iInmMme ne Q wv) ¢ ‘ 7 name and style of Jaffee & Goldlang| This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, W.F.Hard- ing, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that the defend- ants by and through their counsel have agreed that the plaintiff may take judgment for the amount of its claim, said claim being $400.00 together with interest on same at the rate of six percent per annum from the 26th day of March,1924. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plainiff recover of the defendants the sum of $400.00 together with interest the:eon at the rate of six percent from March 26tn,1924, and that defendants pay the costs of this action. W oF eHard ing By consent: R.T.Weathermm Judge Presiding Lewis & Lewis attorney for Plaintiff Buren Jurney _ Attorney for Defendants No. 109 North Carolina, Iredell County. May Term,1924. Superior Court faxura Alice Dayvault | vs 5 JUDGMENT J.D.Dayvault } This Cause comes on for hearing at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County,before his Honor W.# Harding, Judge Pre- siding, and Jury. And the Jury for their verdict having answered the Issues submitted to them in favor of the Plaintiffs, Laura Alice Dayvault: It is therfore considered ordered and adjudged that the mar- riage between the Plaintiff, Laura slice Dayvault, and the Defen- dant, J.D.Dayvault be dissolved, and the parties thereto divorced from the bond of matrimony. Ws Harding Judge Presiding No. 109 North Carolina, Superior Court, Iredell County. ) fey Term,1924 Laura Alice Dayvault i vs ‘ ISSUES J.D.Dayvault. | lst. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry 4s alleged in the complaint? ans. Yes. 2nd. Has there been 4 separation of the Plaintiff and the defendant, and have they lived separate and apart for five years prior to the bringing of this action? Ans. Yes. @rd. Has the plaintiff resided in the state of North. Carolina for the period of five years prior to the bringing of this action? BGGE CEGMGU GEE Gus TECRUCS GOGGGACCESECECC AEC STEGGES No. 99 North Carolina, Superior Court Iredell County May Term,1924. S.Gesloan & William Bros. vs Qecdguerd R.C.Querry This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court, and its appeuring to the Court that the parties hav- ing adjusted their differences: It is therefore considered ordered and adjudged, that the cost of the action be taxed against the defendant, R.C.Querry, by : nee : the Glerk of the Court. WF Harding vudge Presiding By Consent: W.D.turner For Plaintit? Buren Jurney For Defendant No. 49 North Carolina, In the Supericr Court, Tredell County May Term 1924 Jas. C.Davis,Director General of Railroads, J.K.Morrison Grocery & Produce i( i vs } JUDGMENT j i Company. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor W.F. Harding, Judge Presiding, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court by the admission of counsel for plaintiff and defendant that the defendant has paid plaintiff the sum of $195.70, being the amount of the undercharge,plus war tax, in full of plaintiff's demand. It is, therefore,considered and adjudged that this ac- tion be and the same is hereby dismissed, and that the defandant pay the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of this courte W.*. Harding Judge Presiding Approved: Grier & Grier Attorneys for Piaintitt p.T Weatherman Attorney for Defendant No. 71 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before His Honor Wel. Harding, dudge Sareh York i vs § JUDGMENT IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDING Clyde York i Upon the findings of facte in the proceeding in thi cause requiring the defendant to show cause why he should not be at- tached for contempt, it is considered, ad judged,orderea and decreed that the defendant, Clyde York is guilty of contempt of Court in fail- ing @nd refusing to comply with the order of Court, directing that he pay, into the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of this County, for the support of his wife and child, the sum of $25.00 per month as ordered and directed by His Honor B.F.Long. It is, therefore, further considered, adjudged,ordered and decreed that the said Clyde York be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County until he complies with the order of Court, hereto- fore by Hon. B.F.Long, Judge on the day of Jany. 1924. or until Io } ten Sa nhs ; ~ he is otherwise discharged according to law. Wi Harding Judge Presiding Tra Aaf ne a@erendant rceen i } ‘5 3 T iefendant excep to the foregoing order and appeals to the Supreme Ci Notice i i Supreme Court. Not appeal given in open Court and notice waived. The defendant is r i tc ; ” j la} is required to enter into a justified bond in the sum o Ci. 0.0¢ aAnnaAit? _ the sum of $500.00 conditioned that he appear at the January Term 1925 of this C "s an ot 4) $ i ourt, and not depart the same without leave of the Court. - ppeal A fix ®10 appeal bond fixed at $100.00 or to comply with the statute - by agree- ev) oF 5 gQ T “et 7 ment of all parties. Defendant allowed forty-five days to serve case on appeal, & plff. forty-five days after such service to serve counter case or file exception. W.i Harding Judge Presiding “ CECCE CS CEECECEEG eeGe Sewer cudEGuied No. 190 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term, 1924 > = Commercial Credit Company, vs Ea t. Miller,4.C.Crouch C.D.Grouch and m.P, JUDGMENT Alexander, Sheriff Tis cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, «.#.Harding, Judge presiding,upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant, Hd 7. Miller is not represented by counsel and has not filed ean answer to the complaint, and that the other defend- ants and plaintiff have signed said statement agreeing as to the facts, and the Ccurt being of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to the purchase price of the automobile after deducting the costs of sale, storage of the automobile and the fee due the officer making the arrest of Miller and taking the said automobile and that the costs of the sale including the advertisement of the property and the storage amounts to the sum of $9.25 and that the officers fee amounts to the sum of $50.00, and that the auto- mobile when sold brought the sum of $275.00: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Sale of the said Automobile be and the same is hreby confirmed, and the said M.P.Alexander, Sheriff of Iredell County, shall pey over to the plaintiff the sum of $275.00 less the above amounts, being the costs of sale and the officers fee, and also the costs of this action which is to be paid by the said Sheriff out of the above funds received from the sale of the automobile, This judg- ment is not to bind the defendant, 4d 1. Miller, in any way, he not being a party to the agreed statement of facts. W,F* Harding Judge Presiding No. 65 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term,1924 J.J.Gainer,trading and doing business as Gainer Sign and Advertising Company JUDGMENT vs W.L.Mooney and Cobb-Noble Company, Inc. This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard before His Honor We#eHarding, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendants have settled and compromised their dif- ferences, and that the plaintiff desires to take a non-suit: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be and the same is hereby non suited, and it is adjudged that the pay the costs of this action. W.F Harding Judge Presiding No. 116 North Carolina, In Superior Court, Iredell County May Term,1924 Cornelius Stalk ¥S JUDGMENT Chas. J.Jaffee and M.Goldklang, trading as The Leader i This cause coming on to be heard et this term of the court before His Honor W.i*.Harding, Judge and the Jury and it ap- pearing that the defendants are indevted to the plaintiff in the sum of $210.29 with interest from March 30th,1924, until peid for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to the defendants by the plaintiff: It is therefore by consent of the parties considered and ad- judged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred and Ten Dollars and 29 cents ($210.29) with interest on said amount from March 50, 1924, until paid. It is further or- dered that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the costs of this action to be taxed by tive Clerk of this Court: W.F Harding Judge Presiding By consent: Jay John &. Scott, atty. for Plaintiff Buren Jurney, Atty. for Defendant GEECGESEEEE Ge GECEECEL- GEE GEEECCOGEGECEGEECEGEUEGEGE No.* 10% Hester A. Summers | vs FISSUES @.2.Holland j (1) In what amount is the defendant indebted to plaintiff? Ans. $185.65 with interest from Dec. 30,1922 at six per- cent. (2) Did said indebtedness arise from the exchange of prop- erties as alleged in the complaint and was said exchange of proper- exchange by the false and fraudu- 4 ties procured at the time gi the lent representation of the defendant, that the tract of land con- veyed by him to the plaintiff, free of any incumbrance and that there existed no mortgage lien thereon? Ans. Yes. No. 103 North Carolina, In the Superior Courf, Iredell County May Term,1924 Hester M. Summers vs JuD GME DN.? &.Eugene Holland This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, W.F.Harding, Judge presiding, and jury, and the jury for their verdict, having answered the issues submitted to them as set out in the that the defendant, A.#.Holland, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1865.65, with interest 322, at 6% and the jury further finding by their ver- said debt arose from the exchange of properties, as nt, and that said exchange of properties were of the exchange by the false and fraudulent representations of the defendant, that the tract of land conveyed by himto the plaintiff was free of any encumbrance and that there exis- ted no mortgage liens thereon, 7 + It is,. therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that Hester M.Summers, the plaintiff, recover of the defendant, 4.k. Holland, the sum of $185.65, with interest from Dec. 30,1922, until paid at 6% per annun. It is further considered, ordered and adjudged that said indebtedness arose from the exchange of properties by the plaintiff and the defendant and th:t deeds were passed to each other for the property so exchanged; that the house and lot in the Town of Olin deeded to the plaintiff by the defendant was encumbered by a prior lien and at the time of said exchange, the defendant represented to the plaintiff that the same was free and clear from all encwnbrances and that there was no mortgage liens thereon, which representation was falee at the time, and well known to the defendant, and through his false and fraudulent representation, he obtained from the plain- tiff the two tracts of land, which was conveyed to him by the plain- tiff; that in consequence of his shprenbates ion Mann was no lien upon the house and lot deeded to her and relying upon his represen= tation, she accepted the same in exchange f.r the two tracts of lend mentioned in the complaint. It is further ordered that the costs of this action be taxed against the defendant by the Clerk of the Court and the Clerk shall issue execution on the aforesaid judgment and if the same is not paid and the execution returned "No goods to be found", then, in that event, he shall issue an execution against his person. W.F Harding Judge Presiding ECCCECESCCECEEE EGEGEAEEC ECEEGE No. 115 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term 1924 Claflins Incorporated 0 vs C.S.daffee and “,.Goldklang, trading and doing business under the firm name and style of Jaffee & Goldkiang 0 j JUDGMENT i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, W.?.Harding, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that the defendants by and through their counsel have agreed thet the plaintiff may take judgment for the amount of its claim, said claim being $505.18 together with interest on same at the rate of six percent per annum from the 25th day of March,1924: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff defendants the sum of $605.18, together with in- recover of the terest thereon at the rate of six percent from March 25th,1924, and that defendants pay the costs of this action. W.# Harding judge Presiding By Consent: K. 7 Weatherman Lewis & Lewis attorneys for Plaintit? Buren Jur Attorney for Defendant ES | : | | | f | No. 108 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term 1924 J.&.Movrison Grocery & Produce Company vs JUDGMENT S.AePardue and 4.A.Shore This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at this term of Superior Court before His Honor, W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the Court having sitibmitted to the jury, and the jury having answered the following issue, now set out, to-wit: Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? A&A. Yes $180.57 with six percent interest until paid from Cctober 4th,1921. And it further a»pearing to the court that the defendant, SeAePardue executed an undertaking with A.A.Shore as surety in order to stay execution, pending his appeal from the judgment of W.J.Laz- of Peace, and that said undertaking was conditioned that "if said judgment, or any part thereof be affirmed, or the ap- peal dismissed, the said appellant will pay the amount directed to be paid by the judgment ,or the part of such amount as to which the judgment shall be affirmed, if it be affirmed only in part, and all damages which shall be awarded against the appellant upon said ap- peal." It is therefore upon motion of Grier & Grier and kK.T.Weath- erman, Attorneys for plaintiff, considered, adjudged and decreed that that plaintiff recover of the defendants, S.s.Pardue and A.A.Shore, the sum of $180.57 with interest from October 4th,1921, at six per- cent until paid, together with the costs of this action, to be taxed bythe Clerk of this Court. W.F Harding Judge Presiding GOCEEECEOCECEEAGEEGEAEGS EOCECCEEE Be Ue Ge SEER BEGG No. 104 North Caroline, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term,1924 Tidewater Plumbing Supply Company, Incorporated vs C.E.Ritchie Question: In what amount ig the defendant indebted to plaintiff? Ans. Yes. $250.00 with interest from Jan. 22nd ,1924. Me 0 4 : North Caroline, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term,1924. Tidewater Plumbing Supply Company, Incorporated vs JUDGMENT C.E.Ritchie This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the le ; ee 7 ‘ Court, before His Honor, W.F.Harding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issue submitted tc them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as set out in the record. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaint- iff recover of the defendant the sum of $250.00 and interest thereon, at the rate of six percent per annum from the 22nd day of January ,1924, until peid. it is further ordered that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the costs of this action to be taxed bythe Clerk of the Court. W.i* Harding Judge Presiding ey swe OG | POO e ee a ee taL a Pee Ab at aa ? Ft OE AO OCS CLE bts a es Os es uc ip fe nS nr me OTE ee TL Teter kl) Pe a ia nates tag teeth es Se Se SS Se EE 2 7 ete ee ’ 1 as Gee ee scene? . = spine oi No. 121 North Carclina, Iredell County Fred Shoemaker, vs Ada Shoemaker First: Has the plaintiff been a resident and citizen of the state of North Carolina for two years prior to the beginning of this suit? the plaintiff and the defendant married as ai- the complaint? Ans. Yes Third: pid the defendant, ada Shoemaker commit adultery 4 in the complaint? 4ns. Yes. Wr 1 -| T h a1 4y 1 ° North Carclina, In the superior Court, Iredell County. May ‘'erm,1924 fred Shoemaker alias ' a n a 9 Mread Nicnoison vs JUDGMENT Ada shoemaker alias § Ada Nicholson 4 This cause coming on to be heard at this term of court, before his Honor, Honorable W.#.Harding, Judge presiding and a vury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows: 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident and citizen of the state of North Carolina for two years prior to the beginning of: this suit? Answer. yes » 2. were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Yes. Ps 3. Did the defendant, ada shoemaker comnit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer.Yes Wherefore it is ordered,adjudged and decreed by the court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff fred Shoemaker, alias rred Nicholson, and the defendant, Ada shoe- maker, alias fred Nicholson, and the defendant, Ada Shoemaker be and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff, rred shoe- maker, alias rred Nicholson is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered by the court that the plaintiff be taxed with the cost by the clerk of this court. Wee Harding Judge Presiding EEGEGIBCOE IEE WE CCEEC ERE GEGEAOSASSCAE AEE CECECES North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term,1924. Florence B.Ramsey | vs j ORDER GRANTING ALIMONY PENDENTE James M. Ramsey { LITE AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILDREN This cause coming on to be heard before Honorable W.F.Harding, Judge, upon the complaint, motion of the plaintiff affidavits and records in this cause, tne Court finds the fol- lowing facts: lst. That the plaintiff and defendant were married on the 15th day of Nov. 1904, in Iredell Cowity,N.C. and are now husband and wife, and that the plaintiff is now and has been a bona fide resident of lredell County, North Caroline for more than two years next preceeding the institution of this action. Qnd. That there were two children born and now liv- ing of said marriage, to-wit: Virginia Kamsey, now about eight- een years of age and James B.Ramsey now about 14 years of age, both of said children now being in the custody of the plaintiff. Srd. That the defendant, James M. Ramsey,on or about the 2lst day of August, 1921, wilfully and wantonly and without just cause or excuse, abandoned the plaintiff and his two minor children and left the State of North Carolina and has since resided in a dis- tant state, and has failed to contribute anytning to the support of the plaintiff and the two minor children, since said date. 4th. That the defendant, James li. Ramsey, is an able-bodied man,educated and intelligent and has reutation of being a business man and is capable of earning a good income, and that prior to the time he abandoned his wife and children and left the State of North Carolina, he was earning a good income. 5th. That the defendant, James M.Ramsey is the owner of real worth between $8000.00 and $10,000.00. 6th. That the plaintiff has no property whatsowver, except- > g@ home in Statesville, in which she and her children now reside ither the plaintiff nor the two said children have any 7th. That Virginia Ramsey,one of the children of the plain- tiff and defendant, is now being educated at Queens College and that it requires about $800.00 a year to pay for her education,support and maintenance and that Jas F¥.Ramsey, the other child, is attending the schools of Statesville and that it requires about $400.00 ver annum for his support,maintenance and education. 8th. That the daintiff has no funds with which to pay the ance and support and for the support and maintenance of her said children, and no funds with which to pay the fees for her attorneys for services rendered. 9th. That this action was instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant for absolute divorce on the __ day of December 1922, and the defendant duly served with notice of said action by publication, and the complaint herein was filed on the 8th day of Dec. 1922, setting forth the grounds for absolute divorce and for the support and maintenance of the two said children and for the support of the plaintiff, and that thereafter at the January Term, 1924, the plaintiff filed a motion for alimony pendente lite and attorneys& fees and for the support, maintenance and education and custody of the two said minor children, 10th. That a warrant of Attachment against all of the real estate of the plaintiff in Iredell County, North Carolina has been duly issued in this action and duly served upon the defend- ant by publication and the lands of the defendant duly levied upon the sheriff. llth. That the sum of $100.00 per month is a reasonable sum for the support, education and maintenance of the two minor children, and that $1200.00 is a reasonable sum for alimony pen- dente lite for the plaintiff and that the sum of $500.00 is & reasonable sum for attorney's fees. 12th. That the plaintiff has a good cause of action against the defendant for absolute divorce. Upon the foregoing facts, it is now ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and is hereby allowed the sum of $1200.00 alimony pendente lite, up to the November Term, 1924, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and is allowed the further sum of $500.00 for her attorneys’ fees to be paid to John 4.Scott, Jr. and E.M.Land, attorneys. It is further ordered and adjudged that the custody of the two said minor children be and is hereby awarded to the plaintiff and that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the sum of $100.00 per month from the lst day of January,i924, for the support, maintenance and education of the said children until they reach the age of 21 years,or until the further orders of this court. It is further ordered and adjudged that the sum of $1200 alimony pendente lite allowed to the plaintiff and the sum of $500.00 attorneys' fees, allowed to John A.Scott,dr. and BM Land, attorneys for the plaintiff, and the sum of $100.00 per month for the support, maintenance and education of the two said minor children, be and is hereby made a charge and lien upon all the right, title and interest of the defendant, James M.Ramsey, and to the following tracts of land in statesville,Iredell County, N.Ce3 (a) & certain house and lot on Davie avenue,known as the J.S.Ramsey home place, bounded on the Bast by the property of Mrs. &.R.Simons; one the North by Stockton Street; on the West by Miss Stella Mize, and onthe South by Davie Avenue. eal estate situated on North Tradd Street, (bd) Certain r consisting of 8 or 10 houses,known as "The Box Car Row.” (c) One factory building and lot on which the factory is lo- cated ,situated on the North side of East Broad Street, in the City of Statesville, bounded on the Zast by the property of A.Y.Alexander, on the North by the property of C.J.Jones; on the West by the prop- erty of the First Baptist Church and on the South by said East Broad Street. It is further ordered and adjudged that the interest of the defendant in the aforesaid lands be, and is hereby condemned to be gold to pay the aforesaid amounts, and the sum of g100.00 per month for the support, mainteance and education of the two minor children, and that E.li.Land be, and he is hereby appointed Commissioner of the Court to sell the interest of the defendant in said lands at the courthouse door in Statesville, Iredell County, N.C. for cash to the highest bidder, after advertisem nt of said sale at-the courthouse door and three other public places in Iredell County for 30 days and once a week for four weeks in & newspaper published in said county, and report the said sale and his proceedings thereunder to the court. It is further ordered and adjudged that the defendant, James M.eRamsey, be and he is hereby allowed 30 days from the Z2lst day of May ,1924, within which time to pay said sums and redeem said lands and that upon his failure to pay said sums within said period of 30 days and enter into a justified bond in the sum of $5000,00to continue the payment of said sum of $100.00 per month for the support, main teance and education of the two minor children, it is ordered that E.M.Land Commissioner, may proceed to sell said lands as herein directed and that said sale may be made any day of the week or month,except Sun~ days. It is further ordered and adjudged that any of the parties action may bid and become 4 purchaser at said sale. W.F Harding Judge Presiding ame Me- KO North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. y Term,1924 James W. Brown vs H.C.Hunter (1) Did the plaintiff enter into a contract with the de- fendant for the purchase of the truck 4s alleged? Ans. Yes (2) Did the defendant breach the contract? Ans. Yes (3) What damage if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover? Ans. $800.00 mor N6y¢th Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term 1924 James W. Brown Jf vs i H.C.Hunter ' This cause coming on to be heard before his honor,W./. Harding and a jury and being heard and the issues having been answered as set out in the record. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of eight hundred dollars and the cost of this action to be taxed by the clerk. W.F Harding Judge rresiding f Pia! ff “ nr, 10 Y North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Silas Sale, by his next friend S.P.Sale JUDGMENT = i eiaasie Tobacco Co. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Honorable W.¥.Harding, Judge Presiding at the iday Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the*Court that the defendant, while denying liability, is willing to pay to the plaintitf the sum of Pifty )$50.00) Dollars, and the plaintiff is willing to accept the said sum in settlement of all claims which he has arising out of the accident referred to in the complaint; and the Court having developed the case and heard the plaintiff's evi- dence, and being of the opinion that the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and to the best interest of the plaintiff. i. 20 REFORE on motion of C.B.Poindexter, attorney for plaintif onsidered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant Fifty ($50.00) Dollars and the costs of the action. W.F Harding Judge Presiding Consented to e-Poindexter for plaintiff C.B attorne , WH. Beckéeriite Attorney for defendant a BCE CCCCCECE BIE LEEE GEGEECEE CE GAGEIOGES 31.Plofence B.Ramsey VS. James M. Ramsey --- Continued 56 J.W.Copeland vs Mary Rivers Copeland -~--- Continued by consent 61 Hilliard Summers vs. Gertrude Summers --- Continued sabe L. York vs. Clyde York Continued 75 W.R.Kelly vs W.A.Shore <---- Continued /78 W.R.Kelly vs. R.Duke Hay ----- Continued 79 W.R.Kelly vs. James M.Richardson ----~- Continued Q@3 R.F.Gwaltney vs R.H.Mason --- Continued for defendant 92 J.R.Ratisey vs. Stearns Bros. -~-- Continued 102 Tropical B&int & O11 Co. vs R.A.Jones ---- Continued 110 International Shoe Co. vs. The Leader 111 A.A.Cartner vs. 0.G.Sills and others --- Continued 67 McKnight Auto Co. vs. Rice & Rutleage \'73 M.H.McKnight vs Lee Rankin-~ Remanded to the Clerk 89 A.D.Brawley vs. Dora Gray and Mel Gray - Remanded to the Clerk 117 L.W.Malcom, Admr. of W.F.Malcom vs Mooresville Cotton Mills -~ Continued for Plaintiff 118 P.L.Cartner vs. 0.G.Sills and George Board -- Continued L.V.Cartner vs. 0.G.Sills and Geo. Foard --~ Continued 120 Alexander Hamilton Institute vs W.E.Webb p-- Continued / 122 McKnight Auto Co. vs. W.L.Purcer ~~~ Continued 123 T.8.Patterson vs. D.B.Stears --- Continued by consent It is ordered by the Court that all cases not otherwise disposed of are continued to next term of Court. No. 7 Royal Motor Co. The plaintiff comes into Court and takes a Vs voluntary non-suit, therefore, it is ordered Carl Stimpson by the Court that the plaintiff is non-shited John Stimpson and to pay the costs of this action. No. 18 Mrs. Barbara Thompson, Admr. of( It appearin to the Court that the J.C.Thompson, deceased $ palintiff failed to come and prosecute vs her action, therefore, it is ordered J.0.Ervin and Josephine Ervin by the Court that the plaintiff be non- suhted and pay the costs of this action No. 32 Mary E.Lisk, Admx. of E.D.Lisk It appearing to the Court that this vs case tried in this Court and appealed Moorsville Cotton Mills to the Supreme Court and that the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the lower Court, therefore, it is ordered that this case go off the docket. No. 43 , Blow Knox Co. It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff failed vs to come into Court and prosecute his action, thefe- ‘R.M.Hudson & Co. fore, it is ordered that the plaintiff be non-suited and pay the costs of this act on. &: ant ayte f fs, North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Silas Sale, by his next friend S.P.Sale JUDGMENT vs R.J.Reynolds, Tobacco Co. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Honorable W.#.Harding, Judge Presiding at the May Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the*Court that the defendant, while denying liability, is willing to pay to the plaintitf the sum of Pifty )¥50.00) Dollars, and the plaintiff is willing to accept the said sum in settlement of all claims which he has arising cut of the accident referred to in the complaint; and the Court having developed the case and heard the plainti*f's evi- dence, and being of the opinion that the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and to the best interest of the plaintiff. IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, upon motion of C.B.Poindexter, attorney for plaintiff, considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant Fifty ($50.00) Dollars and the costs of the action. W.! Harding Judge Presiding Consented to i C.B.Poindexter attorney for plaintiff? WH. Beckeriite Attorney for defendant a GEESE GEGECASECASOGAS May Térm, YOR, 31 .Flofence B.Ramsey VS. James M. Ramsey --- Continued 56 J.W.Copeland vs Mary Rivers Copeland ---- Continued by consent 61 Hilliard Summers vs. Gertrude Summers --- Continued cenit L. York vs. Clyde York ----- Continued 75 W.R.Kelly vs W.A.Shore ----- Continued /7@ W.R.Kelly vs. R.Duke Hay ----- Continued 79 W.R.Kelly vs. James M.Richardson ---- Continued 83 R.F.Gwaltney vs R.H.Mason --- Continued for defendant 92 J.R.Ratisey vs. Stearns Bros, --- Continued 102 Tropical Bhint & Oil Co. vs R.A.Jones -~--- Continued 110 International Shoe Co. vs. The Leader 111 A.A.Cartner vs. 0.G.Sills and others --- Continued 67 McKnight Auto Co. vs. Rice & Rutledge 73 M.H.McKnight vs Lee Rankin-~ Remanded to the Clerk 89 A.D.Brawley vs. Dora Gray and Mel Gray - Remanded to the Clerk 117 L.W.Malicon, Aamr. of W.F.Malcom vs Mooresville Cotton Mills -- Continued for Plaintiff 118 P.L.Cartner vs. 0.G.Sills and George Board -- Continued L.V.Cartner vs. 0.G.Sills and Geo. Foard -~ Continued 120 Alexander Hamilton Institute vs W.E.Webb p-~ Continued 122 McKnight Auto Co. vs. W.L.Purcer -~-- Continued 123 T.8.Patterson vs. D.B.Stears --- Continued by consent It is ordered by the Court that all cases not otherwise disposed of are continued to next term of Court. No. 7 Royal Motor Co. The plaintiff comes into Court and takes a Vs voluntary non-suit, therefore, 4t is ordered Carl Stimpson by the Court that the plaintiff is non-shited John Stimpson and to pay the costs of this action. No. 18 Mrs. Barbara Thompson, Admr. of ( It appearin to the Court that the J.C.Thompson, deceased § palintiff failed to come and prosecute vs her action, therefore, it is ordered J.0.Ervin and Josephine Ervin by the Court that the plaintiff be non- su&ted and pay the costs of this action No. 32 Mary E,Lisk, Admx. of E.D.Lisk It appearing to the Court that this vs case tried in this Court and appealed t& Moorsville Cotton Mills to the Supreme Court and that the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the lower Court, therefore, it is ordered that this case go off the cocket. No. 43 R Blow Knox Co. It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff failed vs to come into Court and prosecute his action, thefe- R.M.Hudson & Co. fore, it is ordered that the plaintiff be non-suited and pay the costs of this action. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MAY TERM, 1924. No. 44 P.M.Barger, J.V.Barger and E.M.Barger, trading and doing business as, Barger Bros. vs Thomas Thompson, R.N.Thompson and It appearing to the Caurt that the plaintiffs failed to come into Court and prosecute this action, therefore it is. ordered by the Court that the * plaintiffs be non-suited and pay the W.C. Thompson cost of this action. No. 57 E. E. Shafer vs : W.R.Mills and J.P.Mills 4 It appearing to the Court the plaintiff and the § defendants have settled their difference by § compromise, and that the defendants are to pay { the costs, therefore, it is ordered thdt the { plaintiff recover nothing and that the defendants te the costs to be taxed by the Clerk of this ourt. No. 64 Mrs. J.R.Dishman 4 It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff failed vs { to come into Court and prosecute her action, there- E.E.Shaver, R.L.Shoemaker,} fore, it is ordered that the plaintiff be non-suited J.W.Shaver and C.R.Shaver § and pay the costs of this action. No. 92 J.R.Ramsey § It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff failed vs $ to come into Court and prosecute his action, there- Stearn Bros. { fore, it is ordered that bhe plaintiff be non-suited { and pay the cost of. this action. No. 105 Je Re BOLL It appearing to the court that the plaintiff and the vs defendant has compromised and settled their differences C. G. Earp and the plaintiff agreegng to take a voluntary non- suit, therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover nothing from the defendant and that the plaintiff be non-suited and pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. No. 60 J. M. Lowe It appearing to the Court the plaintiff and defendant vs have compropise ettled their differences and J.A.Davidson that the ed to pay the costs and that the plaintiff agreed to take a voluntary non-suit, therefore, it is ordered and adgudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover nothing and that the plaintiff be non-suited and further that the pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the lerk of this Court. No. 69 J. C. Brookshire { It is ordered by the Court that this case be remanded xs { to the Clerk. A. G. Brown, et } North Carolinze, in the Superior Court, Iredell County. W.R.Mills and G.E.Hughey,stockholders ) of the defendant company in behalf of ) themselves and all other stockholders ) and creditors, who may come in and make ) themselves plaintiffs ) vs Mills shoe company REPORT OF RECEIVER fo the Honorable Superior court: The undersigned receiver of the Mills Shoe Gom begs leave to report that he has reduced all the assets of nia eoucaee to cash, aggregating $4,469.84; that he has paid the preferred claims proven to date, aggregating $487.47; leaving a balance in his hands In the Superior Court,May ierm,1924. “O75 for general distribution,$3,982.47; that the costs of the proceed- ing is to be paid out of this fund and thet there should be made an order for Kk.T.Weatherman for professional services a sum of not less than 400.00 and thet an allowance for the service of receiver should be made. i further report that the amount of general claims proven is 910,512,96. I recommend that after the payment of the costs of this proceeding that an allowance of 3400.00 to ik.7.Weatherman, Attorney, and 30 per cent to the general creditors accordim to their respective interests and that the balance be retained by your receiver for his services,which will aggregute less than 5 per cent, or about 4400.00. i{ accompany this report with my final account attached hereto. Kespectfully submitted, W.D.Turner neceiver of Miils Shoe Co. this may North Carolina, On suverior court, Iredell vounty. may 10,1924, W.x.Mills & others, | vs t Account of Keceiver Mills shoe Co, (4 W.D.Turner,xeceiver of mills shoe vompany, In account with said estate,may 19,1924. 1924 keceipt Jan. 16. kec. .S.Tomlin on account " , me 4.E.Harwell " 17 " John A.Scott,uvr. adm. U.Thompson . Cash for repairing dpi. 21 Mrs. w.H.Tomlin,on acct. for v.H.Pitts 22 Wm. wallace on acct. 26. cash on reapiring shoes 12. wash 12 #&.1.Sinkoe,stock,gocds fixtures, shoe repairing outfit 3424.29 . wm. ~.Kingsley,mMobile «la. 8.75 16 mrs. 5.Freeze 1.00 19 kecd.of w.koss mills on sale of account 220.00 w ” " " " a " w 200. Ooo " " " “ " " " * 200.00 1 ' " " bad w " 270.00 “otal charges 94,469.64 1924, Disbursements,rreferred Claims. Jan.29. Gillian urisson,nev. 14x o4.54 : 24 i.aWhite,services reb. Site, inventory = " koss Mills " 1 asheville vitizens Ad. r " Greensboro Daily News, 4d. ~ * he Cbserver U0. . 19 city tax 1922 re 28 state vepartment of Kevenue War. S ¥irst N.Bank kent 1 mo.store . 20 Notice to claimants,statesville baily " 24 Jos.N.Mills,assigned to U.D. stevenson 9487.37 apr.30. J.B. Sdwards,bal.on wages Yo, 90.47 wotal amt. of weneral tlaims proven $10,512.96 kespectfully submitted, bal. on hand w.D.”urner, Keceiver May 20,1924. IN THE SUPERICR CCUKT MAY TERM, 1924, North Carolina, Iredell County in the Superior Court W.K. Mills and G.#.Hughey,stockhkolders, ) of the defendant Company in behalf of ) themselves and 411 other stockholders ) and creditors,who may come in and make ) themselves plaintiffs ) vs ) Mills Shoe Company ) This cuuse coming on to be heard upon the final report of W.u.Turner,xeceiver of mills shoe Gompany,and it appearing from said report that he has reduced all assets of the Company to cash,agegre- gating 44,469.64 and thet he has paid the preferred claims proven, aggregating $487.27 and that there remains in his hands for general distribution, the sum of 93,982.47. Upon this recommendaticnjit is considéred,ordered and ad- judged that he pay out of said funds,the costs of the Special pro- ceeding and to K.i.Wweatherman, attorney,for his services in said estate, the sum of §400.00 and that he pay to the general creditors on their proven claims, 30 per cent, according to their respective interests, and that the balance he shall retain for his services in seid estate. that upon the distribution of the funds as herein directed by the court that he falé-an account of hig disbursements with the Clerk of this court, and that upon the payment of said funds,as afore- Suid, as ordered by the court,thaut he be discharged from further liability us receiver of this estate. #0 Harding Judge rresiding uhis may the 26th,1924. BRK OK OK IE op op PTR EP EER THursday, May 29th.,, 1924, May Term, 1924, Nort; Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredel, County, } May Term, 1924, I, James Wilson Sherpe, do solenty Swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States, so help me, God, James Wilson Sharpe Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, this the 29th day of May, A. D, 1924, Ve F, Harding Judge Presiding and holding Courts %n 15th Judicial District, James Wilson Sharpe, do solemly and sincerely swear that > faithful and bear true allegiance to the State of North end to the constitutional powers and authorities which are, established for the government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the Constitution of said State, not inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States, to the best of my Imowledge and ability, so help me, God, Jemes Wilson Sharpe Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, this the 29th day of May, A.D, 1924, W. F, Harding Judge Presiding and Nolding the Courts in 15th Judicial District, I, James Wilson Sharpe, do swear that I will truly and and honestly demean myself in the practice of an Attorney, according ‘Vv to the best of my kmowledge and ability, so help me, God, James Wilson Sharpe Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, this the 29th day of May, A.D. 1924, W. F, Harding Judge Presiding and holding Courts in 15th Judicial District, North, Carolina, |} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1924, My, James Wilson Sharpe, having presented in open Court a license signed by the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, dated January 28th., AgD, 1924, authorizing him to practice’as an Attorney and Counsellor of law in the Courts of this state, and he having talen and subseribed to the oaths required of Attorneys at law in this state: It is ondered and adjudged that the said James Wilson Sharpe be and he is admitted to the practice of the proféssion of attorney and counsellor at law in all courts of this state, It {s further ordered by this Court that a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread Upon, the Minutes of this Court, This the 29th day of May, A. D, 1924, Ke aa JUDGMENT BEFORE THE CLERK 1924 North Carolina, |} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. Tidewater Plumbing Supply } Company, Incorporated § vs 4 JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUIRY t C. BE. Ritchie This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court on Monday, March 10th., 1924, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff procured a summons from the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 22nd day of Jan., 1924, against the defendant and that said summons was personally served upon the defendant on the 23rd day of January, 1924, and that the plaintiff duly filed a verified complaint before the return daf¢ and it appearing to the Court that the return day mentioned in said summons the 4th day of Feb., 1924, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since said return day, and that the defendant, C.F.Ritchie has not filed any answer. or pleading, denying the allegations contained in the complaint, or raising any issues of fact; and it further appearing to the Court that this is an action upon BM an open account for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant in the sum of $250.00; It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff have judgment by default against the defendant and that this case be transferred to the docket of the Superior Court of Iredell County and an issue submitted to the jury, as to the amount the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant. This the 10th day of March, 1924. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court SESE SE TELE SE BEE ETE EE EEE EE North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} Before the Clerk. Commercial Credit Company, Plaintiff. } vs. i Ed T. Miller, A.C.Crouch, C.D.Crouch JUDGMENT and M.P.Alexander, Sheriff of Iredeli | County, North Carolina. 4 This cause coning on to be heard and being heard before J.A.“artness, Clerk of the Superior Court for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolina, and the Court finding the facts to be that the summons was served on the defendant Ed. T.Miller on day of January, 1924, said service being in all respects regular, that complaint was filed prior to the retur day, February, 4th., 1924, that the defendant Ed. T. Miller failed to file an answer or demur to the complaint within twenty days from February 4, 1924, as provided by law; that the defendant Ed. T. Miller is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of Three Hundred Forty-two ($342.00) Dollars, and interest thereon from the 28th day of November, 1923, on a promissory note. It is therefore ordered considered and @@¢@ndéed that the plaintiff have and recover of the defendant Ed. T. Miller the sum of Three Hundred Forty-two Dollars, ($342.00), and interest thereon from the 28th day of November, 1928, until paid, and for the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 2nd day of June, 1924. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. TERETE TEE ETE TEE Ee Te EE RH IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, refere the Clerk, J.A.Hartness, North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Tredell County. f Before the Clerk, Ss. G, Swann vs uD GMBH ft Oscer R,Mills, C.A,Dearman, © A,B, Lineberger, T. N, Brown, and O,W, Henry This cause coming on to be heard on this the 7th day of July, 1924, before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, and being heard on Monday, the 7th day of July, 1924, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was issued on the 20th day of May, 1924, and was served on the defendants, C.A,Dearman, A.B.Lineberger, T.N.Brown, and 0,W,Henry on the 17th day of May, 1924, by personal service; and that the return date of said summons was on the 7th day of June, 1924; and that the complaint was verified and duly filed on June 6th., 1924; and that said suit was brought on a promissory note; that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date of said summons and filing of said complaint and no answer has been filed; and it appearing that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1000.00 with interest thereon from the llth day of March, 1922, and it further appearing that demand has been made upon the defendants and payment refused; it 1s therefore found by the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1000,00 with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent from March llth., 1922, until paidg It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiaf recover from the defendants, C.A.,Dearman, A,B,Lineberger, T.N,Brown, and 0,W,Henry the sum of $1000,00 with interest thereon at the rate @ of six per cent from the llth day of March, 1922, until paid, and that the defendants be charged with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, and judgment is hereby rendered against the defendants, C.A,Dearman, A.B.Lineberger, T.N.Brown, and 0.W.Henry, for the sum of $1000.00 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent from the llth day of March, 1924, and costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, It further appearing from the Sheriff's return on the summons that defendant, Oscar R.Mills, could not be found in the County of Iredell: It is therefore ordered that an alias summons be issued for defendant, Oscar R,Mills, in this action. This july 7th., 1924. J.A.dartness oy IN THE,SUPERIOR BOURT, 1924, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk. E.L.Long,trading and doing business under the firm name and style of J.d. Long &S5on, vs R.B.Summers and W.R.Mcsuley, trading JUDGMENT and doing business under the firm name and style of Summers & McAuley This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on the 7th day of July 1924, before the. undersigned Clerk of Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the summons in this action was issued on the 22nd day of May,1924, the return date of said summons being on the 7th day of June,1924, and was duly served on each of the defendants before the return date of said summons, and verified complaint was filed in the action on the 27th day of May,1924, and that the defendants are justly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $503.46, together with interest thereon at, the rate of six per cent from the 16th day of Peb. 1924, until peid and that said amount is due on an account,being a stated and fixed amount, and that defendants have failed to file an answer or demurrer to said complaint: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendants for the sum of $505.46, together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent from the 16th day of vebruary,1924, witil paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the defendants by the Clerk of this Court. this the 7th day of July,1924. J.A-Hartness CG. 00s North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk. gndicott Johnson Corporation jf vs i JUDGMENT dames watt ‘ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on the 7th day of July,1924, before the undersigned Clerk of vourt of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the summon in this ac- tion was issued on the 6th day of May,1924, the return date of said summons being on the 20th day of may,1924, and was duly served on the defendant before the return date of said summons, and verified complaint was filed in the action on the 7th day of May,1924, and that the defendant is justly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1245.50, together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent from November 29th,1925, until paid, and that the said amount is due on an account,being a stated and fixed amount, and that defendant has failed to file an answer or demurrer to said complaint. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendants for the sum of $1243.50, together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent from the 29th day of November,1923, until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the defendants by the Clerk of this Court. This the 7th day of July,1924. J.4 Hartness Clerk Superior Court MONDAY, SULY 28th., 1924 North Carolina,}§ In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } August Term, 1924, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the 5th Monday before the first Monday in September, 1924, the same being the 28th day of July A.D. 1924, when and where His Honor, A. M. Stack, Judge Presiding and holding the courts of the 15th Judicial District Fall term 1924, is present and presiding, and the Hon. Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M.P.Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term of the Superior Court, to-wit: The following were drawn and sworn as grand jurors for the term; A.L.Sides, C.H.Knox, J.B.Loftin, J.A.Reavis, E.V.Privette, i.L.Austin, Henry Loyd, A.B.Young, J.W.Henderson, J.F.Brawley, H.A.Cill, 0.E.McKay, J.R.Stroud, B.F.Deal, J.G.Morris, Grady Jolly, H.D.Lackey and Marvin T. Waugh. C.H.Knox was appointed and sworn as foreman of the Grand Jury, 0.B.Lazenby was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury. D.L. Stevenson was returned "Not to be found in Iredell County". John W. Guy, Jr., C.D.Bumgarner and J.Henry Hall were excused for reasonable causes. The following were returned and sworn as petty jurors; R.W. Campbell, L.N.Scott, W.B&Brawley, Z.B.Brown, R.Lee Alexander, D.N. McLelland, B.L.Shoemaker, J.F.Walters, A.L.Jacks, 8.L.Joyner, J.A. Padgett, E.F.Munday, W.C.Perry, Jr., W.F. Pressley. No. 6 ? State FABSE PRETENSE. vs It is ordered by the Court on recommendation O. C. Allred of the Solicitor that this case be Nol Prosed With Leave. No. 7 State TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. vs Defendant appeared and ees ree Nalli It appearing to the Court t s is the eer time for the defendant to appear, therefore it id ordered by the Court that the defendant be discharged. No.8. State ve Joe Tate No. 10 State vs Luke Wallace No. 11 State vs Luke Wallace No. 28 State vs Carl Troutman Alfred Troutman No. 54 State vs Sharpe Combs No. 71 State vs M.M. Johnson No. 73 State vs George W. Long No. 74 State vs George W. Long No. 57 State vs H. Elmer Johnson No. 79 State vs Robert Williams Boss Reid (/ No. 75 State vs Roby Smith Monroe oemaker Ola Mae “eal In the Superi Court., August Term, A924. / v BIGAMY Alias. Capias.and continued. LARCENY AND RECEIVING Alias Capias LARCENY AND RECEIVING Alias Capias and continued. FREIGHT CAR BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Alias Capias and continued. FORGER. TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. _ Continued under. former order GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS Alias Capias and continued. EMBEZZLEMENT Alias Capias and continued EMBEZZLEMENT Alias Capias and continued GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS Continued to next term. HOUSE BREAKING, LARGENY AND RECEIVING Defendants comes into open Court and through their counsel Buren Jurney enters a plea of guilty of House Breaking Larceny and Receiving which pleatithesSélttitor for the State accepts. It is ordered by(théjGcurt that prayer for judgment be continued to November Term, 1924, on the defendants giving bond én. sum of $500R. each for their appearance at said term. STORE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING Each of the defendants comes into open Court and pleads guilty of atore breaking, larceny and receiving as ed in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Roby Smith hang ge RorReletem, N.C. for term o It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant r be imprisoned in the State Prigon at Raleigi., N.C. for a term of YEARS at hard labor. } ee te sréotimehdation of the Solicitor, it is ordered the case against Ola Mae Deal ° in the State Prison YEARS at hard labore J No. 76 State vs Roby Smith Monroe Shoemaker nr, OP wns Noanl NO. 83 State vs Roby Smith Monroe Shoemaker No. 72 State vs 0.G.Sills L. A. Boggs J. O. Gaither No. 78 State vs Buck Brown IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, AUGUAT TERM, 1924 Monday, July 28th., 1924. ARI REIS TR ARES ES TT mG GR AN RTI eR tes PRE ESB a eR gat AES TO ACME ERT OI ERE ma RE eK AIO. es Tie et nea AEE eS LARCENY AND RECEIVING OF AN AUTOMOBILE Each of the defendants Roby Smith and Monroe Shoemaker come into open Court and plead guilty of Larceny and Receiving an Automobile. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Roby Smith, be imprisoned in the State Prison at Raleigh, N.C. at hard labor for a term of FIVE YEARS, at the expiration of sentence in No. 75 for Store breaking, larceny and receiving. Judgment of the Court is that the sentence in this case is not to take effect, if the defendant Roby Smith shall be of good behavior and engage in some useful occupation, but if he violate any of the laws of North Carolina, within said fivesyéats; then the’ Selictitér shall have capias Rasued for ssid defendant and arrested and delivered to the State Prison to serve said five years. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant, Monroe Shoemaker, be imprisoned in the State Prison at Raleigh, N.C. at hard labor for a term of FIVE YEARS, sentence to take effect at the expiration of sentence in No. 75 for Store breaking, larceny and receiving. Judgment of the Court is that the sentence in this case is not to take effect if the defendant Monroe Shoemaker shall be of good behavior and engage in some useful occupation, but if he violate any of the laws of the State of North Carolina within saté five years then the Solicitor shall have capias issued for said defendant and have him arrested and delivered to the State Prison ar Raleigh, N.C. to serve said five years. MALICIOUS INJURY TO IREDELL COUNTY JAIL. The defendants Roby Smith and Monroe Shoemaker each come into open Court and through their counsel waive the finding of a bill and plead guilty of malicious injury to Iredell County Ja&gl. Judgment 4s suspended during good behavior of defendants. MANSLAUGHTER Motion by counsel bysteurtesy assisting the Présecuting Solicitor for removal of the case to another county or for a jury to be selected from another county, the motion is continued until the November Term for final disposition. Case continued to next term of Court. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL Defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel pleads guilty of assault with deadly weapon which plea the Solicitor for the State accepts. ant of the Court is that the defendant be assigned to work on the public roads of the . county of Iredell for a period of two years, pias not to issue upon the following express conditions, to which the defendant agrees: FIRST: That he do not violate any of the laws of the State of North Carolina for a period of five years, and particularly the laws against violence and immorality. SECOND: That upon the further condition that he pay into the Clerk's office for the benefit of the school fund the sum of $50.00, THIRD: That he pay into the Clerk's office for the purpose of paying the prosecutor's doctor bill and expenses in employment of counsel to the sum m the further condition that he pay the < IN THE SUP COURT, Monday, July » 1924, North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | July Term, 1924. The Clerk of this Court is hereby directed forthwith to notify all guardians, executors and administrators, in said county, who have failed to discharge the duties required of them by lew, to do so within twenty days of the date the said notice shall be served on them; and, in case any of said fiduciaries fail to comply within the twenty days, then the Clerk of this Court is further directed to issue a citation to all of such delinquent fiductaries as fail to comply with the aforesaid notice, without a legal excuse, requiring them to show cause, on & day certain, why they should not be removed from office and, further, be attached von TERY ae necessary committed to jail uné£k they should perform the duties required of them by virtue of their said office. The Clerk of this Court will, at the next criminal Term, hawe ready for the grand jury and the Court a list of those who failed to-comply with the law by that time. A. M. Stack Judge Presiding. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday morning, July 29th., 1924, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. it it. Aen te Tudge Presiding 15th Judicfal District. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT,. TUESDAY, JULY @9th,, 1924, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment Tuesday morning, duly 29th., 1924, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business. / No. 73 State EMBEZZEBENT va @Wontinued and appearance bond fixed George W. Long at $3000. No. 83 MALICIOUS State INJURY TO IREDELL COUNTY JAIL. vs Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 Horace Moser after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of malicious injury to Iredell County Jail as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for term of FOUR MONTHS, and: assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period. No. 77 State vs Horace Moser LARCENY AND RECEIVING OF AUTOMOBILE. Defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of larceny and receiving of an automobile as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of {redell County for a term of SIX MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, this sentence to take effect at the expiration of sentence in No. 85 No. 82 i North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} August Term, 1924. No. 82 State { vs 4 JUDGMENT t Marvin Marshall On the charged of assault of his wife, the judgment of the Court is that judgment is suspended upon the payment of the costs in Nos. 82 and 8% and upon the good behavior of the defendant. On the charge of abandonment of his family, the judgment of the Court is that the defendant be assigned to work on the public highways of EheaGdinty of Iredell for a period of two years, capias not to issue on this sentence upon the following express conditions, to which the defendant agrees: FIRST: That he apply himself to some honest occupation constantly for a period of five pears. SECOND: On the express condition that he live with and support his wife and child in a husband-like manner, so long as the marital relations exists between them, THIRD: On the express condition that he does not use any narcotics or dope of any kind for a period of five years. FOURTH: On the express condition that he does not have, possess, transport, receive, buy, sell, deliver or drink any intoxicating liquors for a period of five years. ” FIFTH: es the express condition that he surrender to the Sheriff of this county for destruction the old pistol that he has in his home. SIXTH: Tupon the violation of any of the toms conditions it shall be the duty of the Clerk of this Court to i a capias for the defendant. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this county to apprehend him and deliver him to the keeper of the common cain gang of Iredell County. ! s - i, “Ta ee ng. No. 82 State vs Marvin Marshall No. 86 State vs Marvin Marshall No. 81 State vs Elzie Mayberry Mary Mayberry No. 80 State vs t t Ellen Payton } } No. 87 State vs James Fraley Luther Curry John Tuck Vv No. 88 State vs Richard Holbrook ee ON oan RET eT ee METS IN I EB Ce EK ATI EE AE ON HE EK I me ER ER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, AUGUST TERM, 1924, Tuesday, J 29th., 1924. ASSAULT ON HIS WIFE, A FEMALE OVER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE Defendant comes into open Court and tenders a plea of guilty of simple assault which plea the Solicitor for the State accepts. ABANDONMEMT OF HIS FAMILY. DEFENDANT COMES INTO OPEN COURT and pleads guilty of abandoning his family as charged in the bill of indictment. INCEST Not a true bill. Defendants discharg:<d. LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of larceny and receiving as charged in the bill of indictment. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of TWELVE MONTHS. Capias not to issue until the first day of August, 1924. LARCENY AND RECEIVING Each of the defendants come into open Court and through their counsel waives the finding of a bill and pleads guilty of larceny and receiving. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that each of the defendants be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Four months each and each assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period. Capias not to issue upon the following express conditions: FIRST: That they pay the cost of this agttontby next term of Court; SECOND: That they do not violate any lay of the state of North Carolina and with special reference to stealing. THIRD: That each get a job and stick to it except what time they are going to school. DISPOSING OF MORTGAGE PROPERTY It is ordered by the Court that this case be Nol Prosed and that no cost be taxed. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, AUGUST TERMZ 1924, July 29th., 1924. State of North Carolina, | IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, Iredell County. § AUGUST TERM, 1924, TO HIS HONOR A. M.. STACK, JUDGE PRESIDING: We the Grand Jurors beg to submit the following report: FIRST: We have investigated and acted upon all bills of indictment which have been forwarded to us by the Solicitor of the Court. We have likewise carefully. considered and investigated all reports and complaints of the alleged violations of any of~the laws of the State, alleged to have been violated in Iredell County and have made all such suggestions and presentations to the Solicitor that we deem sufficient and proper. SECOND: We have visited by competent committees, the home for the aged and infirm in the county and found white females, -15; male - 12; colored females - 7; male - 7; They find they have 978 bushels of wheat and rye, twenty-five acres in corn and every thing in good condition and well cared for. We carefully inspected the care and keep of the inmates and find them well cared for and satisfied. \We further find that the home together with the entire premises is splendidly kept, clean and sanitary and comfortable in all particulars. THIRD: We also visited by committee, the County Chain Gang and prison camp and find twenty-three prisoners; six white and seventeen colored. We inquired as to the treatment of the prisoners and found that they are properly treated, properky fed and the camp kept in a clean and sanitary condition. No complaint was heard among the prisoners. as to improper treatment. We found twelve mules in the camp which are used on the roads of the county. We recommend that a shelter be built in which to keep the mules and protect them from the weather conditions, FOURTH: We visited the jail by committee, and found in the jail six white and two colored prisoners. We found the prisoners properly fed and had proper bedding and proper attention, and the jail in clean, sanitary condition, We found a defective flue in the main chimney of the building, and we recommend that this main chimney be raised about eight feet with brick, in order to prevent it from smoking. FIFTH: We inspected the Court House and visited all the: offices by committee, and find the various offices well kept and the business of the county cared for by the gounty officers in a businesu- like way. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, + AUGUST TERM, 1924, TUESDAY, July 29th., 1924, We inspected the present heating plant and find that a new heating plant will have to be installed. We find the present plant of heating unsanitary and injurious to the health, as the opening to the flues are located in the floors and are used as cuspidors and therefore, are vile and filthy. We also found complaint from some of the offices in the Court House, to the effect that the occupants suffer from cold in the winter because the present plant would not furnish sufficient heat. We therefore recommend that a modern steam heating plant or other modern system, be installed in the Court House which will furnish sufficient heat and be sanitary. We recommend, also, xhak that three more toilets be placed in the basement of the Court House. Complaint has come to us from variuos sections of the county, in regard to the Bad condition of certain roads and bridges on and over which the people must go to market, get their mail and take their children to school this winter. We recommend that the county Commissioners have the Chairman or some member of the Board to immediately go over and carefully inspect all the public roads in the county, and to promptly have all such roads as they find in need of repair and attention, put in first class condition before winter comes. We recommend further, that the Gounty Commissioners organize some additional force as is necessary, to keep all of said public roads dragged, repaired and in good dependable condition the year round. Respectfully submitted, C. H. Knox Foreman ou tbe, Admr, of Carl Stewart vs. Miller Mfg. Co. -- Continued under former order 75 W.R.Kelly vs. W.A.Shore -- Continued 78 W.R.Kelly vs. R. Duke Hay -- Continued 79 W.R.Kelly vs James M.Richardson -- Continued 83 R.F.@waltney vs R.H.Mason -- Continued under former order 56 J.W.Copeland vs Mary R. Copeland -- Continued 61 Hilliard Summers vs. Gertrude Summers -- Continued 112 T.S.?atterson vs Edna L. Patterson -- Continued 117 L.W.Malcom, Admr, of W.F.Maleom vs. Mooresville Cotton Mills -- Continued 120 Alexander Hamilton Institute vs W.E.Webb -- Continued 122 McKnight Auto Co. vs W.L.Purcer -- Continued 125 Carolina Iron Works, Inc. vs. E.L.Flowers Supply Co. -- Continued 127 W.E.Ledwell vs. Superior Yarn Mills -- Continued a. dellenevedteh vs M.M.Caldwell --. Continued IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, August Term, 1924, 1924, Tuesday,. July 29th.,. 1924. Doggett-Moss Motor Co. vs John F. Wiggins -- Continued Mrs. Jettie L.Ritchie vs O.M.Hampton, et al -- Continued Mrs. Jettie L.Ritchie vs 8.P.Mayhew, et al -- Continued C.B.Freeze vs Mrs. John L. Lowe -- Opshtm: Madison Paint Co. vs W.H.Mayhew -- Continued Johnson Furniture Co. vs H.A.Alspaugh -- Continued This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday morning Angust 4th., 1924, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. / / < Age #E 15th Jud. Dis't. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, 392 August Term, 1924, + Monday, August 4th., 1924, ‘North Carolimay | Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell Cotintye}” County. August Term, 1924, / This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., Monday morning, August 4th., 1924, when and where His Honor, A. M. Stack, Judge Presiding and holding the Courts of the 15th Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and presiding, this the second week for civil cases at August Term, 1924, M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week for civil cases, to-wit: J.0.Ervin, W.A.Moore, H.M.Barnard, R.S.White, W.L.Robertson, A.E.Howard, J.A.York, C.E.’atterson, A.S.Fuller, C.E.Sherrill, F.A.Harris, John W.Moore, J.C.McNeely, T.A.Nash, J.C.Heatd, Arthur Kinder, E.R.Siceloff, J.R.Pope, James P. Taylor, J.D.Collins. The following were excused by the Court for lawful causes; G.H.Johnson, J.P.Flanigan and A.M.Turner,. H.M.Sherriil was returned as not to be found in Iredell County. The following good and lawful men were sworn as tales jurors for the week: L.C.Goforth, L.R.Smith, E.M.Goodin, R.L.Bradford, W.PrésarShaerpe, L.H.York. : No. 89 State HOUSE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING. vs : This defendant being under Sixteen years of age Johnsie McPherson it is ordered by the Court that this matter be referred to the public Welfare officer of Iredell County for investigation and for disposal, in the Juvenile Court. No. 535 State FALSE PRETENSE vs Defendant comes into open Court and tenders a BR. O. Kyles plea of guilty of Forcible Trespass which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State and not guilty as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer i for judgment be continued to November Term, 1924. No. 60 State GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS vs Defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty R. O. Kyles of giving worthless checks as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued torNovember Term, 1924. No. 155 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term,1924 W.B. Stewart vs Sallie M.Stewart TSsSSUES 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermerry as alleged in the compleint? Answer ; Yes ‘2, Has theplaintiff been a boni fide resident of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes 3. Did the defendant conmit adultry as alleged in the come Answer; Yes North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County August Term,1924 Wer 132 W.B.Stewart vs aun G 2 EST Sallie M.Stewart This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard before His Honor A.M.Stack, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court as set out in the record: : It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and defendant be and the same are hereby disolved, and the plaintiff be granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, Ae M. Stack Judge Presiding 394 No, 154 ; North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County August Term,1924 Oma Pearson vs Ed M, Pearson ist: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Ans. 2nd, the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the com- Ans, Yes 3rd: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Car- olina for more than two years prior to the starting of this action? Ans. Yes. No.154 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County August Term,1924 Oma Pearson 6 vs DECREE GRANTING DIVORCE Ed M, Pearson Q This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, A.M.Stack, Judge Presiding, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issues sub- mitted to them in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant had committed adultery as alleged in the complaint: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the marriage between the plaintiff,Oma Pearson, and defendant, Edm, M,Pearson, be, and the same is hereby dissolved, and the said parties thereto be, and they are héreby divorced from the bonds of matrimony. Let the costs be taxed to this plaintiff©Y, A.M.Stack Judge Presiding in the 15th Judicial District @QQIWBGSIVE GCSGOBGIGIAO. No, 31 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County July Term,1924, Florence B,Ramsey, 4 James i Ramsey 0 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer - Yes 2. Has theplaintiff been a resident of Iredell County,North Carolina for two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer - Yes 3, Did the defendant separate himself from the plaintiff and commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes No, Sl. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County July Term,1924 Florence B,Ramsey, 4 bg JUDGMENT James M,Ramsey t This cause coming on to be heard at the July Term of the Court before His Honor, A.M,Stack, Judge, and a jury and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as follows, to-wit: 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermerry as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes 2, Has theplaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, North Cerolina, for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes 3, Did the defendant seperate himself from the plaintiff md commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? It. is, therefore, ardered, considered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony existing betwee n the plaintiff and defendant 394 No, 154 North Carolina, In the Superior Gourt, Iredell County August Term,1924 Oma Pearson vs Ed M, Pearson ist: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ANS. Yes Did the defendant coruit adultery as alleged in the com- plaint? Ans, Yes 3rd: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Car- olina for more than two years prior to the starting of this action? Ans, Yes. No.1354 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County August Term,1924 oma Pearson vs DECREE GRANTING DIVORCE Ed M, Pearson Q This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, A.M.Stack, Judge Presiding, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issues sube mitted to them in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant had committed adultery as alleged in the complaint: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the marriage between the plaintiff,Oma Pearson, and defendant, Edm, M,Pearson, be, and the same is hereby dissolved, and the said parties thereto be, and they are héreby divorced from the bonds of matrimony, Let the costs be taxed to this plaintif?, A.M.Stack '' Judge Presiding in tne lbth Judicial District No, 31 North Carolina, é In the Superior Court, Iredell County July Term,1924, Florence B,Ramsey, 4 vs ISSUES James M, Ramsey q 1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer - Yes 2, Has theplaintiff been a resident of Iredell County,North Carolina for two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer - Yes 3, Did the defendant separate himself from the plaintiff and commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes No. 31. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County July Term,1924 Florence B,Ramsey, 4 ; vs VDE NT James M,Ramsey , This cause coming on to be heard at the July Term of the Court before His Honor, A.M.Stack, Judge, and a jury and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as follows, to-wit: 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry 4s alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes 2, Has theplaintiff been a resident of Iredell County, North Cerolina, for two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes 3, Did the defendant seperate himsel.? from the plaintiff md commit adultery ss alleged in the complnint? It is, thersfore, ardered, considered and sdjudged that the bonds of matrimony existing betwee n the plaintiff and defendant = 396 be, and the same are hereby absolutely dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Tt is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, ; A.M, Stack vudage Presiding L ot North Carolina, In the S,. Court, Iredell County July Term,1924, Mes, Florence B,Ramsey, Plaintiff vs CONSENT JUDGMENT James li,Ramsey, Defendant This cause coming on to be heard at the July Term of the Court, by the admission of the parties, that the defendant, through his attorneys, has paid to the plaintiff the sum of $4000,00 in full discharge and satisfaction of all rights of the plaintiff in and to the real property described in the attachment in this action and all other property omed by the defendant, and in full of the allowance made for attorneys’: fees, alimony pendente lite and allow- ance for the support of the children up to the value of the property attached: It is, thereupon, ordered and adjudged by and with the con- spnt of the vlaintiff, that the Warrant of Attachment heretofore granted in this action be, and the same is hereby vacated and set aside and the lien created thereby against the property of the defendant can- celled and the notice of Lis Pendens heretofore filed in this action is set aside and ordered to be cancelled and in consideration of the payment of said sum of $4000.00 the plaintiff, Florence B,.Ramsey,does hereby forever release fhe person and estate of the defendant, James M.Ramsey, for my and all claims of whatsoever kind, growing out of the marital relation and accepts the said sum in ful} satisfaction of her rights now and hereafter in the estate of the said James M.Ramsey and further that out of said sum, the said Florence B.Ramsey, shall expend so much as may be necessary to educate, maintain and care for said minorhildren at least to the first of January,1926, so that the said Florence BRamsey shall not hereafter make any claims or demands on the said James M,Ramsey and shall be personally responsible for the education, maintenance and care of the said children out of the prodeeds of the said $4000.00 up to Jan, 1st,1926. at Least” It is further, by consent of the plaintiff, ordered and ad- judged that after Jan, 1st,1926, the plaintiff, as the mother,will not ask a see k from the defendant any further money to reimburse herself for the support and maintenance of the two minor children of the plaintiff and defendant, after the said date of Jan, 1st,1926; but this is not to bar the minors of any rights they may have against their father, if the mother fails (to support and properly maintain them) A.M. Stack Juage Presiding By Consent: John A.Scott,dr. G, Mv, Land, Attorneys for Plaintiff Lewis & Lewis oe Atta@meys for Yefendant GBAAAGAWVWOIGGOADAAGDIBIISES @@QADQAQVLAGAAGOSAAISAGAGO No, 139 North Carolina : In the Superior Court Iredell County Mrs, Lizzie Brown 4 vs TSs v2.8 George F, Brown t 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant intermarried, as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes 2, Has the plain-iff been a bona fide resident of North Cerolina for more than two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer Yes 3. Did the defendant commit adultery with one, Lillie Brown, as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes No, 139 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County August Term, 1924, Mrs, Liszie Brown |} vs JUDGMENT George F,Brown 0 This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court,bel’ore His Honor, Stack, Judge, and a jury, and the jury having answered the 4ssues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the de- fendant as follows: "he Were the plaintiff and defendant intermarried as alleged in the compalaint? Answer Yes 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of North Car- olina for more than two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes 3, Did the defendant commit adultery with one, Lillie Brown, as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes." It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and they are hereby dissolved and set aside and the plaintiff granted divorce from the defendant, It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, A.M, Stack Judge Fresiding Noe 1022 worth Carolina, In the Superior Court Tredell County Fall Term,1924 Tropical Paiit & Cil Co, Plaintiff 4 vs Consent Judgment R.A, Jones ,Defendant This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard befare Honorable A,M.Stack, Presiding Judge, and it appearing to the Court that all matters in dispute between plaintiff and defendant have been adjusted, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the come promise agreed upon,(same being that the defendant pay plaintiff 420,00 and costs of this action), be entered of record as the Judgment of this Court. This 4th day of August,1924, A MW atack fie —“jJudee rresiding, 15th Yudicial “istrict Lower Court Costs $°3.25 in addition to Superior Court Costs No. 132 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County August 4th,1924 W.B, Lambert 4 vs tess 88 Amanda Lambert lst: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes 2nd: Q. Has the plaintiff been a resident of State of North Carolina for a period of two years, prior to the starting of this action’ Answer, Yes 3rd: Q, Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff without cause, as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, No. 1357 Borth Carolina) ee¢ ( sci IM THE SUPERIOR COURT ( Iredell County) July 1924 Term, David Clarke vs Mary Clarke ) JUDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard in this term of the court before his Honor A. M. Stacks, Judge Presiding and jury having answered the issues as follows: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: 20S, Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and comit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the stcte of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. I€ IS THEREFORE ordered, adjudged and decreed bythe Gourt that the bonds of mabrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved, A. M. Stack £e es ng No. 1357 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County July 1924 Term. David Clarke vs Mary Clarke ) ( ) ( Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, Did the defendant abondon the plaintiff and commit adultery as alleged inthe complaint? Answep : Yes Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of t erolina a8 alleged in the complaint? me Se OF Answer: Yes, fue | *U North Caroline, Superior Court, Iredell County August term,1924 : C.A.Shook vs (4 JUDGMENT J.M.Morrison & J.L.Hudson i This cause coming on to be heard at this term of court, before his honor, 4.M.Stack, Judge rresiding, and it appearing to the Court, that the plaintiffs cause of action is founded on a judgment for a sum certain, that the summons was duly served on the defendants and the complaint duly filed. may 5th,1924 md was duly verified, and the defendants having failed to answer and defend the actions It is therefore considered,ordered and ad- judged that the plaintiff have judgment against the defendants by dafault for- want of an answer. it is t erefare at ae and adjudged -— GesAeSHOOk plaintiff recover J.LoHudson, the sum of fourteen hundred forty and 80/100 with interest on 9900.00 from the 16th of may, 1924, and cost of action to be taxed by the vlerk. A.M.Stack Judge vresiding eeeeacceceeccceece CGEEEEECEEEC CO CEE No.16 <= J.0.Wilcox vs nobert mcDaniels et al. It is ordered that formal notice be issued in the case of J.0.Wilcox vs kobert mcDaniels to come in and file pleadings within the next 30 days, otherwise, case will stand dismissed. No.19 -= sherrill umber vo. et 41 VS. beS.Gooding: It is ordered that the plaintiff be directed to employ counsel if he sees fit. No.23 <= 4.C.Caldwell ve L.O.White It is ordered that mrs. valdwell, sadministratorx of LC. Caldwell, employ counsel by the next term of the court or the actiom @i@ valdwell vs L.0.White will be dismisaed. ps: har No. 38 ~- J.L.Ingram va m.V.Bartles: Notice to be issued to the defendant to employ counsel ana defend his action or judgment by default will be taken against him at the next term of court. ‘No. 45 -= Neal-vlott crovery Co. vs n.M.Hudgson: Dismissed. No. 88 n.L.Dickens et al vs «»P.Nicholson this cause is referred to P.P.Dulin,#sq. as referee under the consolidated statutes to hear the case,find the facts, and de- clare the law srising thereupon, and the Court will find the facts and conclusions of the law at the next term of this court, together with the evidence taken by him. ine further order of the Court is that the timber in contro- versy be sold by the referee 23 receiver to the very best possible advantage and to hold the funds until the final termination of this action, the referee is directed to give notice to both parties and hear this case within the next 30 days. To the foregoing order the defendant excepts. Se me ee te nx.L.Dickens and wife,rannie vickens vs n.o.Souther and wife,vearl souther tnis cause is referred tc ¥.P.Dulin,susq., as referee under the consolidated Statutes to hear the case, find the facts and de- Glare the law arising thereupon, and the court will find the facts and conclusions of the law at the next term of this court,together with the evidencé taken by him. this case to be heard at the same time as No. 88 10 days allowed plaintiff to file compleint and 20 days thereafter for defendant to file answer, #o this order the defendant excepts, No. 4-~Merchants & Farmers Bank of MOOoresVille vs D.4.Beam and L.A. Beam, whe referee is directed to hear this case within the next 30 days and make a report at the next term of the Court. No. 5.-J.H.McElwee vs nutton & Bourbonnais Co. it is ordered by the court that notice issue to J.H. McElwee to employ other counsel instead of mm. 4, 0mMpson if he desires, and it is ordered that the referee proceed to make his report within the next 30 days. Noel6-<=- J.0.Wilcox vs nobert mcDaniels et al. it is ordered that formal notice be issued in the case of J.0.Wilcox vs nobert mcDaniels to come in and file pleadings within the next 30 days, otherwise, case will stand dismissed. No.1@--Sherrill Lumber Co. et al Vs 6.5.Gooding: it is ordered that the plaintiff be directed to employ counsel if he sees fit, No.23-- 4.C.Caldwell vs L.O.White It is ordered that mrs. Caldwell,administratrix of Lele Caldwell,employ counsel by the next term of the court or the action of L.C.Caldwell vs 1.0.White will be dismissed. No.38-~J,L. Ingram vs m.V.Bartles: Notice to be issued to the defendant to employ counsel, and defend his action or judgment by default will be taken against him at the next term of court. No. 45--Neal-vlott wrocery vo. ve k.M.Hudson: Dismissed, No.11l north carolina, Iredell county A.A. Cartner : vs i 0.G.Sills } First: Were the buildings and the property belonging to A.. A.Cartner destroyed by fire, due to the negligence of the defendant C.G.Sills,as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes second: what damage if any, is the plaintiff, a.&.Cartner entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer:$500.00 eeCeeeeeece ee CCEECECE No.73 North varolina, In the superior vourt, Iredell vounty July sverm,1924. State i vs JUDGMENT Geo.w. Long i In No.73 on the state vocket at this term the defendant weo. W.Long comeg into Court and pleads not guilty to the charge of em- bezzlement preferred against him, but tenders the plea of nols con- tendue to the charge of wilfully omitting and neglecting to perform the (duties of vlerk and wreasurer, of the city of statesville,.C. as required of him by law. ‘uhat is to say - he pleads that he is hot guilty of the felongy whereof he stands indicted, but is unwill- ing to contend with the state on the charge of a misdemeanor which is demnounced in section 4384 of the Consolidated statutes, and there~ fore submits himself to such judgment as the VCourt may pronounce upon his plea of omission and neglect of duty as the Clerk and treasurer of the said city of statesville. 405 his plea of the défendant is accepted by the state, and the Solicitor does not resist a4 werdict of not guilty as to the felony charged and prays that judgment be entered upon the plea tendered by the defendant. Whereupon, the Court imposes the fine hereinafter named,upon the recommendation of the solicitor and the mayor of statesville, and upon it appearing to the court that the accused had made a full and complete settlement with said city and had paid over to the city @11 funds due by him to said city before any action was taken by a Grand vury of iredell County, and upon the further showing that the defendant has been, and now is, a man of good character and good habits. Upon the said plea tendered by the accused, and accepted by the state, it is adjudged that the defendant weo. w.Long, pay a fine of $1000.00 and the costs of this action in No.74 at this term against the same defendant, tre same plea is made and tendered by the accused, as in No. 73, at this term, and in like manner the State accepts said plea, and the judgment in said case is sus pend= ed upon good behavior and the payment of the costs in the action by the defendant. sihis august 5th,1924. 4.M.Stack, Judge «residing and holding the courts of the 15th vudicial vist. SECEREEE CCEE LECESESES CEEGECECCELEEEEC CEL GE North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Sarah York 4 vs § CONSENT JUDGMENT Clyde York 4 This cause coming on to be heard at the present term of the Court, before the undersigned, Judge of the Superior Court,presid- ing in the Fifteenth Judicial Distirct of North Carolina, and it appear- ing to the court that the parties to this action have compromised their differences and do hereby consent to the following judgment in said action, lst. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the answer of the defendant to the plaintiff's cause of action, both the original answer and the amended answer, be withdrawn, including all affidavits tendered to the court and filed in thts cause by the plaintiff, Sarah L.York and the defendant, Clyde York, urther considered, ordered and adjudged that. . the decsee at bak.) basin. sles of the Fifteenth District and hold- ing the courts in seid district, ordering the defendant to pay into court $25.00 per month for the support 9 the plaintiff and. ohii.i4, pend ing this litigation and to be paid on the 20th of each and every mon thereafter, be and the same is set aside and annulled, we ee 406 3rd: It is further ordered that the order of Hon.W.F.Harding, Judge presiding in the Fifteenth Judicial District for the May Term of Iredell County, adjudgingthe defendant in contempt of court for the non-payment of $25.00 per month to the plaintiff, as directed and ordered by Judge B.F.Long, be and the same is hereby revoked, set aside and annulled, 4th. That it further appearing to the court that the defendant,Clyde York, has paid to the plaintiff, Sarah York the sum of $400.00 in full settlement of all differences growing out of the controversy in the above entitled action and by consent he is hereby relieved of all further obli- gations for the maintenance and support of the plaintiff and child,with the right and privilege for the plaintiff to enjoy and possess the fruits of his labor and he is under no further obligations for the support and maintenance of the said Sarah York and child, while they remain separate and apart, as man and wife. 5th. It is further considered, ordered and adjudged by consent, that the defendant, Clyde York, shall pay the costs of the action, to be taxed by the Clerk of this court. A.M.Stack Judge Presiding By consent: Grier & Grier Long & Jurney ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF W.D.Turner Lewis & Lewis ,John A.Scott,dr. Attorneys for Defendant Sbate vs Troy Mayhew Car ordered forfeited arid sold, and fhe Commercial Credit Company ° having filed a claim on chattel mortgage duly recorded for more than $200.00, it is ordered that this claim be paid from the proceeds in so far asit will go akter paying the officers fee and cost of sale. goa f IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, Tuesday, August 5Sth., 1924. No. 111 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} August Term, 1924. A. A. Cartner {| vs 4 JUDGMENT Oo. G. Sills This cause coming on to be heard ahd being heard before His Honor, A. M. Stack, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the following issues as follows; which issues were suimitted to the said jury in the above entitled case by his Honor, as follows: “First: Were the buildings and the property belonging to A.A.Cartner destroyed by fire, due to the negligence of the defendant, 0.G.Sills as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes SECOND: What damage, if any, is the plaintiff, A.A.Cartner entitled to recover from the defendant ? Answer: $300.00. Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and dddnéedithat the plaintiff, A. A. Cartner, recover judgment vs. 0.G.Sills, in the amount of $300.00 with interest on same from the expiration of said term of Court, until paid. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff, A.A.Cartner recover of the defendant, 0.G.Sills, cost of this action, to be taxed hy the Clerk of the Court. A. M. Stack Judge Presiding No. 111 A. A. Cartner } vs t NOTICE OF APPEAL. TO SUPREME COURT 0. G. Sills 4 Motion in open Court for new trial for errors in the charge of the Court and refusal of prayers of instruction. Motion over-ruled, Defendant excepts. Judgement in the verdict and appeals to the Supreme Court. Notice of appeal waived. By consent defendant allowed 60 days to make out case on appeal and plaintiff allowed 60 days thereafter for counter case of exceptions. Bond in $50.00 adjudged sufficient on appeal. A. M. Stack Judge Presiding Presiding 15th Judicial District North Carolina, in the Superior vourt, Iredell county pefore the Clerk. Ira u.Royster vs he G.Rhyne This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the superior vourt of iredell County and being heard,and it appearing to the Court that on the 18th day of June,1924, plaintif procured a summons to be issued against the defendant returnable on the Srd day of July,1924, and it. appearing that on fhe 2lst day of June ,1924, said summons was duly served on the defendant; and it further appearing that this is an action on a note for the collection and payment of a certain sum of money fixed in said note towit: for the recovering of #450.00 and interest thereon from the 2nd day of June,1924; and it further appearing that on the 168th day of June, 1924, plaintiff filed a verified complaint of this action,and that on the 20th day of month from seid return date the defendant appeared and asked for an extension of time in which to file his answer,and that said time was extended for the period of ten days from the 23rd day of July,1924; and it further appearing that more than ten dq@ys have elapsed since the extension of time given the defendant to file his answer, and that defendant has failed to appear and answer or demur, and it furtier appearing to the vourt that defendant is now due owning plaintiff the sum of #450.00 with interest thereon from the 2nd day of June,1924. it is,therefore, considered,adjudged and decreed that the pla in- tiff recover of the defendant the sum of 9450.00 with interest tere- on from the 2nd day of vune,1924, until paid, together with the costs of this action,to be taxed by the vourt. uhis the 4th day of August,1924. JA Hartness Clerk Superior vourt ecacceceeeecec ee ads CECCACEE worth Carolina, In the Superior Court, North Carolina, In the superior Court Iredell County iredell County pefore the clerk, J.R.Ramsey vs JUDGMENT OF NONSUIT S.d.Holland and J.B.Cooper,trading and Stearns Bros.iInc. doing business as Ulds sales Company vs M.GePope and U.4.srown § This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have adjusted all matters of difference between them out of court, and the defendant having This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned vlerk of the superior Court of iredell County on monday, paid the plaintiff the amount agreed upon; and the plaintiff hav~- July 26th ,1924, and it appearing to the Gourt that the defendants ing come into court and requested to be allowed to take a non- were each personally served with summons in this cause,uné that the suit: plaintiffs filed a verified complaint in said action on or before It is, thereupon ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff the return dey set forth in said complaint, and that the defendant be and he is hereby non-suited and this action dismissed and the are justly due the plaintiffs the sum of 9342.14 together with in- court costs of $6.90 paid,one-half by the plaintiff and one-half terest thereon at the rate or six per cent per annum from the llth. vy the defendant, as per the terms of their compromise. ‘ ; ‘ J.4.Hartness day of april,1924, until paid, and that said sum is due on a note, Slerk Superior CT being a certain and stated amount,and that said defendants have failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to said complaint ime allowed by : GeGGEeseeCoucae within the time allowed by law: SLGCCGECCESEGIE Now,therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover judgment against said defendants for the sum of $342.14 together with interest thereon from the llth day of April, 1924, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum,and that the n the Superior Court costs of this action be taxed against said defendants. North Carolina, I e supe ’ Befo the Clerk. This July 26tn,1924,. Iredell County. efore the Cle SeJeHolland and J.B.Cooper, as Clds Sales Company JUDGMENT vs W.L.Brown This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before CSOCE CECE COEEE CCRC CEEEGEECESE the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell C,unty on sepia Monday, July 28th,1924, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was personally served on the defendant ,and that the plaintiffs filed a verified somplaint in said action on or before the return day set forth in said gummons,and that the defendant is justly indebted to the pleintiffs in the sum of $316.26 to- gether with interest thereon et the rate of six per cent per an- ne aE num from the 4th day of April,1924, until paid, and that said sum or amount is due on a note,same being & certain stated amount,and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to the complaint filed in this cause: Now, thnerefore,it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover judgment against the defendant for the sum of $315.28 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from April 4th,1924, until paid, and that the said defen- dant be taxed with the costs in this case. This July 26th,1924. JA -Hartness JeAeHartness,C.SeCe CGSGESCCCEEeC eee SCBSECECCECE GE CCS North Carclina, In the Superior Court, Iredell Ccunty Before the Clerk. S.edJ-Holland and J.B.Cooper vs GOR PLAST J.B. Parks,N.Sankey Gaither and K.i#.Gaither The plaintiffs complaining of the defendants, allege and 1l.that the defendants, on or about the 4th day of may,1921, being indebted to the pleintiffs,made,executed and delivered to them their promissory note for the sum of $600.00 the amount of the in- debtedness said amount drawing interest from date at tne rate of six percent per annum,and payable in six months from date. 2. That the said defendants have made two payments on said note,one for §200. O November Sth,1921 and one for $150.00 May lst,1922 leaving a ballance now due by the defendants to the plaintiffs the sum of $280.45 together with interest thereon from the lst. day of May, 1922 until paid at the rate of six per cent per anr’um; that plaintiffs have made demand on the defendants for the payment thereof, which has been refused or neglected. WHEREFORE, plaintiffs demand judgment against the defendants for the sum of $260.45 with interest thereon et the rate of six per cent per annum from the lst. day of may,1922 until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against said defendants,and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper. Lewis & Lewis Attomeys for plaintiffs S.d.Holland,one of the plaintiffs in the above entitled action after being duly sworn,says:That he has read the foregoing com aint and that the said complaint is true of his own knowledge,excet as to those matters and things therein upon information,and belief, / and as to those matters and things,he believes it to be true. S.dHollam Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 5th day of July,1924. JW .5,8ar pe Dept. Clerk S.Court eeceacecececceceoese eceesssccececccesace North Carolina, In the superior Court, Iredell County G.L.McKnight and Mason H. McKnight,pertners trading and doing business under the firm name and style of the McKnight Motor Company vs John 1.McNeely f This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the superior vourt of jtredell vounty,and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 18th day of June,1924 Plaintiffs procured & summons to be issued against the defendant returnable on the 30th day of June,1924; and it further appearing that on the 18th day of June,1924, said summons was duly served on the defendant; and it further appearing that this is an action for breach of an express contract to pay absolutely a sum of money fixed by said contract, towit: for the recovering of 940.67 ané for the further sum of #560.00 and interest thereon from the 7th day of December,1920, due by note; and it further appearing that on the 18th day of pecember,1920, plaintiffs filed a verified complaint in this action,and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return of said summons and the filing by plaintiffs of the verified complaint as aforesaid, and that defendant has failed to appear and answer or demur;and it further appearing to the court that defendant is now due and owing the plaintiffs the sum of $40.67 and the further sum of $560.00 with interest thereon from the 7th day of December,1920. It is, therefore, considered,adjudged and decreed that the plain- tiffs recover of the defendant the sum of $40.67 and the further sum of 560.00, with interest thereon from the 7th day of vecember,1920, until paid,together with the cost of tnis action,to be taxed by the Court. this the 28th day of July,1924. JeoeHartness Clerk of the superior Court CORE SSEESUCEEISEES eecceccececaceccsa North Carolina, In the superior Court, Iredell County pefore the Clerk. Bruner sox by his next friends, -C.Fox and Mamie Fox vs 1 JUDGMENT B.Aé.Troutman and L.L.Troutman partners,trading and doing business i under the firm name and style of Mcoresville #urniture Company { This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the superior vourt of iredell County,and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendants have compromised the controversy existing between them and growing out of the matters alleged in the complaint on the following terms: vefendants agree to pay the plaintiff the sum of $200.00 and the cost of this action,as a full and complete settlement for the injury sustained by plaintiff, pruner sox, at the time and on the occasion mentioned in the complaint. _ It is, therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $200.00 in the above entitled action,together with the cost of said action. JA .Hartness Clerk of Superior court By consent: A4.L Starr Tttorney for rieintiff B.A.Troutman & L.L.Troutman Defendants By L.L.Troutman CCESCECECECEE CL Cee ewes CESCSSCE CECE GECECEEETECES North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk. S.d.Holland and J.B.Cooper,trading and doing business as Vlds sales Com any vs $.W.Hines i This cause coming onto be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County on Monday,vuly 28th,1924, and it eppearing to the court that the de- fendant was duly served with personal servise of summons in this action, and that the plaintiffs filed a verified complaint on or before the return date or day set forth in said summons,and that the defendant is justly due the plaintiffs the sum of $281.30 together with interest thereon ut the rate of six per cent per annum from the 4th day of November,1920, until paid, and that said sum is due on @ note being for e certain and stated amount,and that the de~- fendant has failed and neglected to file and answer or demur to said complaint within the time allowed by law: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover judgment against the defencant for the sum of $281.30 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 4th day of November,1920, until paid,and that the costs of this action be taxed against said defendant. Yhis July 28th,1924. J.A,Hartness Clerk Superior Court COSC CE GRU Se ode Hee GOCE LCEEEE CECEES North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Ulerk. S.J.Holland and J.B.Cooper,trading and doing business as Olds Sales Company t JUDGMEDSRBT A.W.Herris - i This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Ulerk of the Superior Court of lredell County on Monday, the 28th day of July,1924, and it a-pearing to the Court that the defendant has been served by personal service of summons,and that the plaintiffs filed a verified complaint in this action on or before the return day set forth in said summons,and that the amount due the plain- tiffs by the defendant is 9628.00 together with interest thereon from tae 18th day of Uctober,1920, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum,and that said amount is due by note,being 4 certain stated an answer amount,and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file/or demur to said complaint within the time allowed by law: It is therefore,ordered and adjudged by the vourt that plain- tiffs recover, judgment against the defendant for the said sum of $628.00 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 18th day of October,1920, until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against said defendant. “his vuly 28th,1924. J,4.Hartness C65... COSCERL CCE - SSCHSECL GES CECE CCE E COOL eeuddacdage North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County G.L.McKnight and Mason McKnight partners,trading and doing business under the firm name and style of McKnight Auto Company,rlaintiffs H.H.Doggett and S.Moss, partners JULGMENT trading and doing business under the firm name and style of voggett Moss Motor Company,and 8.B.doggett, vefendants This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, W.F.Harding, Judge holding the vourts in the rifteenth Judicial vistrict, and it appearing to the Court that this case was referred to Hon. W.l.Turner,referee,by consent, and that,after the beginning of the hearing of said cause bef. re said referee at statesville N.C. on march 4th,1924, the plaintiffs and defendants agreed upon a settlement and compromise of said matter and that the terms of said compromise were drawn up and signed bythe attorneys for plain- tiffs and defendants on said date,and it further appearing to the vourt that all the terms of said compromise have been carried out by the plaintiffs and defendants and that all matters and things in controversy between them have been settled and adjusted,and all the payments in money therein provided for have been made and all the property delivered, it is therefore,ordered,adjudged and decreed that all matters in controversy and difference between the plaintiffs and defendants have been adjusted and settled and that each acknow~ ledges full anc complete settlement from the other. and it is further ordered that the defendants pay all the cost of this ac- tion prior to the hearing before the referee on march 4th,1924, and that the defendants pay their own witnesses and any cost connected therewith for said referee's hearing,including one-half of the allowance to the referee,Hon. w.v.Turner,said one-half be- ing $25.00 and one-half of the stenographer's fee,said one half being 95.00. it is further ordered that the plaintiffs pay their witnesses end any cost connected therewith for the referee's hearing on March 4th,1924, and that they pay one-half of the allowance to the referee,Hon. W.D.Turner,and said one-half being $5.00 making a total of $50.00 to the referee to be paid by the plaintiffs and defendants and @ total of $10.00 to be paid to the stenographer. It is further agreed that this judgment may be signed out of term and out of the district, if necessary. W.# Hardin —Judec holding Courts in Fifteen Judicial vistrict Couseuted to by ZEb. V.Turlington Grier & Grier Attorneys for Plaintiffs hedfcern & Huey Long & Jurne Attorneys for Defendants CECECCEE Ce CLSEGEE & GGCEECECECEEEECES NORTH evgenciend IN THE SUPERIOR COU IREDELL COUNTY) — Frank W. Elliott vs L. D. McComneli & M. W. McConnell ) ) Panl Rubber Company) JUDGMENT ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on this the 18th. day of August 1924 and it appearing to the Court finding as a fact that due service of the summons was made upon the defendant, the Paul Rubber Company by delivery of a copy thereof to its Secretary and Treasurer in the marnzer provided by law, but not served upon the defendants lL. C. McConnell and M. W. McConnell for the reason that they had left the State of North Carolina and were reported and supposed to be in Oklahoma and have not yet returned to North Carolina, that service was had upon the Paul Rubber Company, a corporation, more than ten days before the return day thereof, that the plaintiff in due and apt time filed his Complaint duly verified, that twenty days have elapsed since the return day of the summons and no Answer has been filed by the said Paul Rubber Company, and the plainfiff now moving for judgment by default final upon his Complaint against defendant, the Paul Rubber Company, the Court upon examination of the Complaint finds and adjudges that it de= cleres upon a breach of an express contract to pay five-thousand dollars to the plaintiff, the terms whereof were fixed in the contract, that the Bonds of the Paul Rubber Company held by the plaintiff prior and up to the first of Jamuary 1924 in the amount of $5000.00 were secured by a valid Deed of Trust upon the real and personsl assets of the corporation as the records of Rowan County will show and were worth $5000.00, that this transfer from the plaintiff and exchange for Common Stock in the Company was procured and brought about by the fraud, duplicity, deception and misrepresentation of the defendant the Paul Rubber Company through the other defendants, its offisers, managers and authorized agents, that said transfer and exchange is therefore null and void as to the plaintiff and not binding upon him and that he is and is entitled to be held and considered as now the owner and holder of said Bonds of said Company in the amount of $5000.00 and that judement should be entered in his favor establishing and protecting plaintiff in his rights to and in sid Bonds. It is now therefore considered, ordered and ad~- judged that the transfer and surrender of the $5000.00 Bonds of the Paul Rubber Company, procured from the plaintiff by fraud and deceit, was void and of no effect and not binding upon the plaintiff and that he has at all times been and is now the owner ‘and entitled to said Bonds; that if the said Paul Rubber Company has not destroyed or cancelled said Bonds or transferred them to an innocent holder for value, it is hereby directed and command- ea to return them to the plaintiff and accept back from him the certifieates for fifty shares of its Common Stock; that in the event it is unable to repossess the plaintiff of his original Bonds, then it is further considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and he is hereby declared to be entitled to be considered an owner and holder of Bonds of said Compa in the amount of $5000.00 issued as of about August 1st. (lst) 1923 and secured by deed of Trust upon the property of the Company as appears of record in the office of the a re of Deeds of Rowan County, and in the admingstration of the affairs of said Paul Rubber Company and in any disposition of its property and assets due accounting and sattlement shall be made with plaintiff under this judgment for such money as he Weuld be entitled to receive if he were still in the actual possession of his said original Bonds and they had never passed out of his hands. . fhe defendant, the Paul Rubber Comp , is ad- judged to pay the costs of this action and the defe: oats LB. McConnell and M. W. McConnell not having been served and the . plaintiff not moving for an alias Summons as to them there is & aigcontinuance as to them under the provisions of the statute in such cases. or ' e Nobth Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk Statesville Lumber Co. va ORDER REVIVING JUDGMENT Lee Dobson and Mary Dobson It appearing from the return of the Sheriff of Iredell County, upon the notice issued in the above entitled action, that the defendants therein were duly notified to appear af the office of the undersign on the 2lst day ¢ of July 1924., and show cause why execution should not issue on the Judgment described in said notice; and it further appearing to the said court that said judgment has not been satisfied, and said defendants having failed to show cause why execution should not iesue on said judgement: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said judgment be and the same and is hereby revived, to the end that execution may be issued thereon, It is further adjudged that the cost of the proceeding to revive said judgment be added to the costs taxed in said judgment, This the 28th day of July 1924, J.A.Hartness es : C.8.C. Iredell County, N.C. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County 0.G.Sills vs Before the Crerk G.W.Ford I,G.V.Ford, the defendant in the above entitled case, hereby confess judgment in favor of 0.G.Sills, plaintiff, for three hundred and nine dollars, and authorize the entry of judgment there- for, against G.W.Ford on the sixth day of September,nineteen hundred and twenty four, The confession of judgment is for a debt now justly due, from G.W.Ford to the said plaintiff arising from the following facts: that judgment was entered in the Superior Court in favor of P.L.Cartner against 0.G.Sills ana G.W.Pord for thirty six dollars and eighty cents and costs, and in favor of L.V.Cartner against said parties for thirty dollars and costs, and one in favor of A.A. Cartner against 0.G.Sills for three hundred dollars and costs, and GW.Ford recognizing that he is primarily liable for same and that said judgments have been compromised with the plaintiffs in whose favor said judgments were rendered and that 0.G.Sills the aforesaid Plaintiff having paid said judgments and upon a settlement between said Sills and Ford, it was agreed that said Ford's liability growing out of said judgments amounts to three hundred and nine dollars ;which said sam is due to the said plaintiff, 0.G.Si1ls over and above all just demands that said Ford hath against said Sills, G.W.Ford G.W.FORD, being duly sworn, says that the facts stated in the above confession are true and the amount of the judgment confessed is justly due the plaintiff. G . We Ford Sworn to and subscribed, before me, this the sixth day of September,1924. J.A,Hartness Clerk of Superior Court € North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk, W.E.Ledwetl vs Superior Yarn Mills, Inc. This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have compromised and settled their differences, and that the defendant has paid the plaintiff the sum agreed upon. And the plaintiff having come into Court before the Clerk and requested permission to take a voluntary non suit, It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be, and he is hereby, non suited and that the said plaintiff be taxed with the cost of this action. This the 1§th day of September,1924. J.A,Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court @QQQQQDQEAHOOGV@ North Carolina, Iredell County. C.M.Steele,H.0.Steele, A.P.Steele,F.F.Steele, and E.&.Rankin, trading and doing business under the firm name and style of States~- ville Brick Company vs G.+.Walker, trading and doing business as Walker's Grocery & Hardware Company JUDGMENT It appearing to the Court that since the bringing of this action, defendant has paid the plaintiff the amount demanded in full. It is therefore, considered and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the defendant. J-A,Hartness JAhin Aft ps 174 ‘Clerk S.Court ee rE een tine mmntcentinnienenerne s.... A . te z meer titan tatiana tn eshte an In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, 423 North Carolina{j In the Superior Court, Iredell County.}§ Before the Clerk, Eugene Morrison, Jr. § vs § JUDGMENT A. B. Johnson ‘ This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 13th day of September, 1924, plaintiff procured a summons to be issued against the defendant, returnable on the 24th day of September, 1924; and it appearing that on the 16th day of September, 1924, said summons with a copy of the complaint in this action was duly served on the defendant; and it further appearing that this is an action on two notes for the collection and payment of certain sums of money fixed in said notes, to-wit: for the recovery of $276.00 and interest thereon from, or about the 27th day of January, 1924, and for the recovery of $727.25 with interest thereon from the 27th day of October, 1923; and it further appearing that on the 13th day of September, 1924, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in this action and that a copy of said complaint was served with the summons and that more than twenty days had elapsed since the swrvice of said summons and complaint on the defendant, and that the defendant failed to appear and answer or demur; and it further appearing to the Court that defendant is now due and owning plaintiff the sum of $276.00 with interest thereon from the 27th day of January, 1924, and for the further sum of $727.25 with interest thereon from the 27th day of October, 1923, It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $276.00 with interest thereon from the 27th day of January, 1924, until paid, and the sum of $727,25 with interest thereon fron the 27th day of October, 1923, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This the 6th day of October, 1924. J. A. Hartness ~ Gierk of the Superior Court ETE ETE ETE ETE A TEE EE EE HOE Ee aE EE PASTE TESTE EE EE Ee In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. Mrs. J. W. Johnston 4} vs 4 JUDGMENT I, R. Johnston b This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Su, Superior Court of Ire@@l1 County, on Monday, October 15th, 1924, and it appearing | to the Court that summons was duady issued in the above entitled matter and personally served on the defendant on the 5th day of March, 1924, and that the Plaintiff duly filed, on March 15th, 1924, a verified complaint, and it appearing that this is an action based upor. a promissory note executed by the defendant to the plaintiff on Jan, 51, 1922, for the sum of $250.00, with interest at 6% from date until paid, and thet the defendant has paid on said note the sum of $10.00 onMmay 14, 1925, and is justly due and owing to the plaintiff the balance o? said note and the defendant having failed to make any apperrance, or file an answer, raising an issue of fact, or denying the allegations of the plaintiff. It is,therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintirr recover of the defendant the sum of $266.57, with interest thereon from the 3rd daybof March, 1924, Until paid, and the costs of this action, This the £3th day of October, 1924, J. A. Hartness _—s_ Clerk Superior Court Bb REESE SES tsb tb tebe shabbat FETE ETE EEE SE EES EE te it the 8 dg IN THE SUPERIOR CourRT, NOVEMBER TERM, 1924, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3rd., 1924, North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County§} November Term, 1924, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolina, at the Court House in Statesville, N.C., on the 9th Monday after the lst Monday in September, 1924, the same being the 3rd day of November, A.D, 1924, At a meeting of the Statesville Bar Association, a resolution was unanimously passed continuing Court from day to day until Thursday, thee6th day of November, 1924, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., when and where His Honor, A. M. Stack, Judge Presiding and holding the Courts of the 15th Judicial District, Fall Term, 192 » 1s present and presiding, and the Hon. Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, M. P. Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term of the Supertor Court to-wit: The following were drawn and sworn as grand jurors for the Term D.N.McLelland, W.W.Rankin, A.C.Crouch, H.S.Renegar, W.L.Keller, J.B. Praley, Jr., W.M.Caldwell, M.E.Johnston, R.B.Oats, Isidore Wallace, E.E. Edmiston, C.A.Hudspeth, J.Q.Warren, W.L.Barnard, Rome Clark, Robert A, White, W.L.Keller, E.H.Ostwalt, D.N.McLelland was appointed and sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. 0.B.Lazenby was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jury, N.M.Gibson, W.S.Kelly, J.C.Galliher and John M.Cashion were returned, "Not to be found,in Iredell County," W.T.Nicholson was excused for reason of being an undertaker, The following were returned and sworn as petty jurors; W.B. Norris, J.M.Powers, J.A.Raymer, H.C.Dellinger, J.A.L.Deal, O.M.Kennerly, Mason E. Brown, E.R.McAuley, Harvey J. Cook, T.C.Ostwalt, W.L.Freeze, and A.M.Gaither, No. 6 2 State PERJURY vs On motion of the Solicitor, it is ordered tha 0. ©. Allred this case be nol prosed with leave, No. 8 State BIGAMY vs Nol Prosed With Leave, Joe Tate, (Col) No. 10 State vs Luke Wallace No. 11 State vs Luke Wallace No. 28 State - V8 Carl Troutman Alfred Troutman No, 53 State vs R.O.Kyies No. 60 State va R. O. Kyles No, 71 State vs M. M. Johnson No. 79 State vs Robert Williams Boss Reid No. 72 State vs 0. G@. Silis L. A. Boggs J. O. Gaither No. 84 State vs John D. McGlamery No. 91 State vs Frank Myers No. 92 State vs Frank Myers Glenn Speeks Arlie ec ‘Mursday, Nov. the, 1924, NOVEMBER TERM, 1924. Pee re LARCENY AND RECEIVING Nol Prosed With Leave LARCENY AND RECEIVING Nol Prosed With Leave — LARCENY AND RECEIVING Nol Prosed With Leave FALSE PRETENSE Prayer for judgment continued under former order, GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS Prayer for judgment continued under former order. GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS Alias Capias. HOUSEBREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Prayer for judgment continued under former 6rder*and on the further express condition that the each of the defendants go to school during the school months, MANSLAUGHTER Continued and motion for removal continued under former order. ABANDONMENT Alias Capias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias FORCIBLE TRESPASS Alias Capias as Speaks and Rash, and continued as to Myers NOVEMBER TERM? 1924, Thursday, Nov. 6th., 1924, Noe 93S State vs Vernie Anderson No. 97 State va Mott Anderson “Noe 103 and 104 State vs Hobert Stutts No. 95 State vs Eston Rhinehardt Bertha Whittenberg No, 106 State vs Robert Ruff (AE RE ALPS ETE AER SEI me GAL SALI EI eR ETS RI EIR a A ese TI I A TR ota SET aah est IN EA eI GES aed SAG EN eee 7 MAE ETE te eek I nas oa PERJURY A true bill found this term and Capias . TRANSPORT ANDPOSSESS LIQUOR Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. Instanter VYapias CITY LOCK-UP TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR @MMTTEMPT TO BURNZ Defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of transporting and possessing liquor as charged in the bill of indictment and aa’so pleads guilty of attempting to burn the city lock-up of Mooresville, N.C. as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that on the liquor charge let him go to jatlrfer a term of FOUR MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period. It is further ordered that on the charge of setting fire to the Mooresville calaboose,let him go to jail for a term of SIX MONTHS and assigned to the public roads of Iredell County for said period. The latter sentence in no event to take effect until after the expiration of sentece in liquor case, and not then on the express condi- tion that he will not violate any other law of North Carolina for a period of five years, and particularly the prohibition laws of North arolina. LARCENY AND RECEIVING Bach of the defendant come into open Court and through their counsel plead not guilty. The following jurors were sworn and empannelled for their verdict: W.B.Norris, J.M.Powers, J.A. Raymer, J.A.L.Deal, O.M.Kennerly, Mason E,Brown, E.R.McAuley, Harvey J.Cook,. T.C.Ostwalt, W.L.Ex Freeze, A.M.Gaither, H.C.Dellinger, say they find the defendant not ghilty of the charge whereof kam they stand charged in the bill of indictment. ABANDONMENT AND NON-SUPPORT OF WIFE AND CHILD The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel pleads guilty as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered ahd adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO YEARS, and assigned to work on the public roads of Iredell County for said period, Capias in this sentenca, not to issue on the condition that he give a good bond in the sum of $200 for his appearance at the next term of this court to show that he has gone back to anédolivingawithuand supporting his wife and child and deporting himself as a husband ought to. On the further condition that’ he appear at the next term of this Court and show that the bill of cost has been paid and show that he hes not violated any of the lawe oh of the States Condition is that he not only ap- pear here, but appear &nd pay the bill of costa. No. 99 State vs John Loyd Tuck No, 94 State vs Jesse O. Goodman No. $07 State vs Henry Woodwine No. 205 State vs Pauline Blair No. 98 State vs W. E. Wood j/ Vv No. I60 State vs Harry Payton I ATC AE a A ee A aT i 4 ' ) } : ‘ i i a IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, NOVEMBER ‘TERMZ 1924, Monday, Nov. 6th., 1924. HOUSEBREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of housebreaking, larceny and receiving as charged in the bill of indictment. On the count for Larceny let him be sentenced to the workhouse of Rowan County for a period of eight months. On the count of receiving let him go to the State Penitentiary for a period of TWELVE 'JONTHS, Capias of the latter sentence not to issue if he does not run away from the Rowan @emnty workhouse, or so long as he does not commit any crime and either goes to school or applies himself to some honest work for a period of five years from the term of this Court, FORGERY Defendant comes into open Court and plead guilty of forgery as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Jesse 0. Goodman be imprisoned in the State *rison at Raleigh, N.C. for a term of TWELVE MONTHS at hard labor. LARCENY AND RECEIVING The defendant comes into open Court and pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant not gui lty. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ’ The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of an assault with deadly weapon as charged in the whll of indictment / It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR MONTHS, and assigned to work at the Home for the Aged and Infirm for Iredell County for said perioag. GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS Defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of giving worthless checks to defraud as charged in the bill of indictment. Let the defendant be sentenced to the common jail of Iredell County for a period of EIGHT MONTHS, and be assigned to work on the public roads of said county, capias not to issue on the express condition that he will not use any more paregoric or other nocotics and that he does not violate any of the laws of the State for five years. LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Defendant pleads guilty to larceny and receiving as charged in the bills of indictment in the different counts. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant go to the common jail of Iredell County for a period of FOUR MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period,in the first case, that of “amsey-Bowles#Morrison Co. In the Efird case let him be sentenced to the roads for SIX MONTHS, capias not issue on the express condition that he does not violate any of the laws of North Carolian for five years and on the further condition that he does not steal any more so long as he lives. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday, November 7th., 1924, nt 00 o'clock, A.M, FRIDAY MORNING, NOVEMBER 7th., 1924, This Honorable Court convened Friday morning, the Yth day of November, 1924, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M. according to adjournment for the dispatch of business, No. 108 State vs Buck Wood, Alias Buck Coleman ‘ No. 101 State vs Herman Pierce ™“ Noe 102 State vs Herman Pierce ' No. 96 State vs Geneve fart No. 16 State vs : Lonnie Reavis (ET FO AC wo EE Do ee ee A OR I NE ae RAPE The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel F.L.Grier tenders a plea of guilty of condoning with a female under 16 years of age and he himself being under 18 years-of age which the Solicitor for the state accepts. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell Counfy for a term of TWELVE MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads for said pounty for said period. BIGAMY The defendant comes into open Court and through his Counsel pleads guilty of Bigamy as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defenant Herman Pierce be imprisoned the State Prison for perio@ of not less than three years, nor more than five years at hard labor. ABANDONMENT On motion of the Solicitor, it is ordered that this case be nol prosed with leave. TRANSPORT, POSSESS AND SELL LIQUOR The defendant comes into open Court and through her counsel pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of transporting, “possessing and selling liquor as charged in the bill of indictment. Let the defendent go to jail for a period of FOUR'MONTHS on the count for transporting, with leave to the county commissioners to hire her out at the expiration of thirty days. On the count for possessing let her go to jail for a period of SIX MONTHS, this sentence not to begin in any event until after the expiration of the one for transporting. capias not to issue on the express condition that she does not handle liquor in any form for a period of FIVE YEARS. SECOND: That she observe all the laws of the State of North Carolina for a period of five years, Let her pay the costs. At the expiration of thirty days in jail the Commissioners may hire her out, provided she has paid the costs 4n this case, otherwise, let her stay on fourt months. LARCENY AND RECEIVING, TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. The defendant appeared and showed ood behavior and at sppoeeine to the Court that this is the ef: " time the ndant was to ordered by the Court that ¢ FRIDAT} November ‘ths, 1024) 430 No. 97 State vs Mott Anderson RECEIVING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR The defendant comes into open Court and tenders a plea of Nolo.Contender of receiving and possessing liquer which plea the Solicitor for the state accepts. On the count for receiving, let the defendant pay a fine of $25.00 and the costs of this action, On the count for possesing let the defendant be axxignad ampfisoried in the common jail of Iredell County for a period of SIX MONTHS and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, the capias not to,ismue on this sentence on the express conditions to which he assents in open Court that he wll not buy, sell, possess, receive, transport, deliver, furnish, give away or drink anybwhiskey for a period of five years from the adjournment of this court. The Sheriff of this County is further requested to keep a close lookout to see whether, or not, he violates any of the foregoing conditions, and if so report to the Clerk, and it shall be the duty of the Clerk to issue a capias for his arrest, and then the duty of the Sheriff to deliver him to the Superintendent of the chain gang. SR ee ae OE RT CE NE ME one a ES RE I Ro The grand jury for this term appeared in open Court in a body and submitted their report for November Term, 1924, It is ordered by the Court that the Grand jury report for November Term, 1924, be spread upon the Minutes of this Court. REPORT OF GRAND JURY To the Superior Court, November Term, 1924 Iredell County Beginning Nov. 6th. & Judge J.M.Stack “residing- We the Grand Jurors for November Term of Iredell County SuperiorCourt, 1924, beg leave to submit the following report: e have passed on all bills sent us by the solicitor and made returns of same to Court. We visited the County Home by a Committee and there we found twelve white men and nineteen white women; seven negro men and six negro wo~ men. Committee talked with several inmates and they all said they had plenty of nourishing food, well prepared and served to them. We find the house neat- ly kept, they thereby showing that the one big idea with the keeper is clean- liness of inmate and premises. COURT HOUSE Inspection made in body. We find all the offices are } neatly kept and records carefully filed for the convenience of those wanting to refer to same. We recommendethat the hall floor be repaired. CHAIN GANG We find 15 men in the chain gang camp; four white and eleven negro men. fhey report that they are all treated well. The chain gang has twelve mules all in good condition forwork, with wagons, scrape plows, shovels, picks and other tools that are being used in the work. We recommed that the Commissioners purchase a Ford truck for use on the roads. In doing this, we feel that this will save the county considerable expenee in hauling supplies for the camp. JAIL We also visited the Jail in a body. We find seven prisoners: four white men, two colored men and one colored woman. They report that the treatment received there was satisfactory. This Nov. 7th, 1924. ‘ Respectfully submitted, re oa, Nie, D. Ne. McLelland “Foreman orand “ury This Honorable Court'tekes a recess until Monday morning, November 10th., 1924, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. Re Ream OMe a, ae eg IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, NOVEMBER TERM, 1924 Second week, Nov. 10th., 1924, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, } i Second Week, Nov. 10th., 1924, Iredell County. November Term, 1924, This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., Monday morning, November l10th,, 1924, when and where His Honor, A. M. Stack, Judge Presiding and holding the Courts of the 15th Judicial District of North Carolina, is present and presiding, this the Second week for Civil Cases at November Term, 1924. Me. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week for civil cases, to-wit: J.A.Bost, J.M.Cash, J.L.Karriker, M.H.McKnight, J.B.Johnson, R.L.Bradford, W.H.Bell, J.P.Alexander, Goe. A. Watts, L.S.Kennerly, T.A.White, B.S.Gaither, H.A.Rimmer, R.M.Culp, J.H. Cranford and J.F.Orren. The following were excused for lawful causes; W.R.Johnson, T.I.Bailey, J.F.Faichild, B.H.Adams, The following were returned as, "Not to be found,in Iredell County;"J.B.Witherspoon, R.T. Nesbit and Clyde Morrow, E.E.Collins was returned being sick and unable to attend Court by reason of having Enfluenza. The following good and lawful men were sworn as tales jurors: D.H.Dingler, L.Q.Goodin, Harvey J. Mullis No. 35 BKastman Vardner & Co. It is ordered by the Court that this case be vs remanded to the Clerk for judgment before J.C.Holmes Lumber Co. said Clerk. No. 38 J.L.Ingram It is ordered by the Court that Clerk notify vs defendant according to order made at August M.L.Bartles Term, 1924, and that case be continued under former order. No. 75 W. R. Kelly va W. A. Shore It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff comes into open Court through his counsel ant takes a voluntary non-suit, therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff bed moh-baited ahd pay’ thé cobts*oF! thissabtion to bec taxed by the! Clerk 6f'this Court. No, 78 wee ¢ W. 3 ~—- vs oe JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT BY PLAINTIFF R. Duke Ha ' tt appearing toMthe Court that the plaintiff comes into open Court and thro his couhsel takes a voluntary non-suit, therefore, it is ordered ea adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited and pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. JUDGEMENT OF VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT BY PLAINTIFF * No. 79 W. R. Kelly vs James M. Richardson No. 83 R. F. Gwaltney vs R. H. Mason No. 88 R. L. Dickens, et al vs J. P. Nicholson No. 143 R. L. Dickens, et al vs N. S. Souther, et al N. 94 Industrial Products Corporation vs D. E. Turner & Co, No. 120 Alexander Hamilton Institute vs W. E. Webb No. 125 Carolina Iron Works Inc, vs E.L.Flowers Suppy Co, No, 129 North Carolina{ } Iredell County. } Howard Boggett amd 8. Moss, Trading as Doggett-Moss Motor Company vs John F. Wiggins November Term, 1924, Monday, Nov. 10th., 1924, Grier & Grier, Attorneys for the defendant come into open Court and withdraw as Attorneys for the defendant and ask that they be allowed to withdraw the answer filed by them as attorneys, therefore,it is ordered that said attorneys be allowed to withdraw, and withdray the answer filed by them for the defendant’, It is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff ana defendant have leave to make new parties plaintiffs and defendants and &thénd and file other pleadings, Continued under former order, Continued under former order Continued Continued Continued by consent In the Superior Court, November Term, 1924, t ' i JUDGMENT : This acuse coming on to be heard before His Honor, A. M. Stack; Judge and being heard and it appearing that the property has been delivered to the plaintiff and all matters in controversy between the parties has been settled out of Court: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs settlement with the defendant be confirmed and that the sosts be taxed against the defendant by the Clerk of this Court, BY CONSENT: Vv lington y for plain A, L. Starr orney for defendan uage Presiding IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, November Tern, 1924, Monday, Nov, 10th., 1924, No. 28, North “arolina, { In the Superior Court, Iredell Ccunty.§ November Term, 1924, W. H. Wood j vs th Mooresville Cotton Mills $ This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Judge A. M. Stacj, and being heard and it appearing that the matters in controversey have been compromised and settled by the defendant paying to the plaintirr the sum of Six Hundred Dollars which said sum the Plaintiff agrees to accept in full compromise and settlement of all Claims for damages alleged to be due him on account of matters and claims alleged in the complaint in this cause, Now therefore by consent it is ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Six Hundred Dollars and the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. A. M. Stabk Judge Presiding J. F. Flowers Buren Jurney Attorneys for Plaintiff Z. V. Turlington W. D. Turner Attorneys for Befendant COQ IAM MILA LIOPOGHI@) COCCOWCOONIROOOOOORIEE This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday morning, November llth., 1924, at 9:00 O'clock, A. M, t hee 1 / Judge ‘residing District Tuesday, November lith., 1924. This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M., on the llth day of November, 1924, for the dispatch of business. 122 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County November Term,1924 G.L.eMcknignt and Mason Mcknignt trading and doing business under the firm name and style of Mcmmignt Auto Company, vs ' &.L.Purcer ‘ Tais cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this sf the Court before his Honor,a.M.stack, judre yregiding, and appearing to the Court that tne parties have compromised > in controversy in this acticn; defendant agreeing to plaintiffs Pifty Dollars in full of all demands b “ee Lei : a stare > deferdant, which pleintiffs agree to accent as a full discnarge ot all claims and demands ageinst defendant. fore. considered and adjudged that plaintiffs It. is, .there ‘i recover cf the defendant the sum of Fifty Dollers with interest there- on from December 1,1924, togetner with the cost cf this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. AeM.Stack consent. Z.V.Turlington Grisr & Grier EGEGCeIeseed CECEGEGELECEEGE LEE Ho. 152 North Caroline, Superior Court, Iredell County Nov. Term,1922 PeAeSherrill and E.We-Allison vs N.C.Snerrill This cause coming on for hesring at this term of tne Court before His Honor, A.li.Stack, Judge and jury, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issue submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff, as set out in t! record: > It is therefore considered orderéi and adjudged tnat the plaintiffs P.. ne j nd E.W.Allison recover of the defend- ant N.C.Sherrill, the sum of One Tncusand, twenty and no hun- dredths dellars, with interest from June 2,1922 until paid and the cost of the action, toto be taxed by the Cler«x cf tnis Court. & Mecstack Judge Presiding No. 152 North Garclina, Superior Court Iredell County Nov. Term,1924 P.x.Sherrill & E.W.e-&Allison vs N.C.sherrill What amount is the defendant indebted Plaintiff? ans. Yes. $1020.00 cocceocscaceeccase ecegececeeacaaccaceaceda North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County November Term - 1924 Madison Paint Co. vs JUD Gaze aT W.o.layhew Tris cause coming on to be heard before His Honor,4.M. Stack, Judge and a jury and it appearing that after the jury was empanelled the plaintiff and defendant compromised their differences by the defendant agreeing to pay the plaintiff $45.00 in full of all claims against tne deferdant, the defendant to pay all costs except the witness fees of C.V.Voils. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of tne defendant the sum of Forty sive dollars and that action, except the witness fee of C.V.Voils be the defendant to be taxed by the Clerx cf this court. A.lkosStack Judge rresiding Jno. L.Davis Atty... tor" 2 Z.V.TUurlington atty. for Defendant GE CEECECEEE CESLE eee BGS - CCEECRAEE No. 128 North Caroline, In the Superior Court, Iredell Cowmty November Term - 1924 &.dJ Honeycutt vs M.M.Caldwell This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor A.M.Stack,Judge and s jury and being heard and the jury having anewered the issues as set out in the record. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Ten Dollars and that the cost be taxed against the defendant to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. &.WeStack dgudge Presiding From foregoing judgmen sfendant appeals Supreme Court . Notice of appeal bond fi at ¢ OC Sixty days given after court to serve case on appeal and sixty days there- efter for apellee to serve counter case or file excepticns to appellants cuse. A.M.sStack Judge rresiding No. 151 North Carolina, In the Superior Ccurt, Iredell Ccunty November Term,1924 Katie B.Blackwelder vs ISSUES George Blacxwelder lst. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermsrry 4s alleged in the complaint? ans. Yes 2nd. Has the plaintiff been & boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five consecutive years prior to the Commencement of this sction,as alleged in the com- pleint? Ans. Yes Srd. Have the plaintiff and defendant seperated, and have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for more than five consecutive years prior to tae commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? No. North Carolina, Iredell County Ans. Yes. 151 In the Superior Court, November Term,1924 Katie B.Blacxwelder vs George Blackwelder term stac the tne and is Tris cause coming 01 be heard and being neard it this 42-40 of the Supericr Court of County before His Honor, a.li. k, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury naving enswered issues submitted to them by tne Court, as set out in the record: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that bonds of matrimony neretofore existing between the plaintiff defeudant be and the same are hereby disolved, and tne plaintiff erented an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of tnis action. AeleStack Judge Presiding SGAE SCRE CEE SEE SUGEECCESE GECESE ACE GEE CE SECC BE CCOE No. 150 North Carolina, In the Superior Court s-*? o Iredell County November Term,1924 Laura Ball { vs (4 ISSUES lst. Did the plaintiff d defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? answer. Yes 2nd. Has the plaintiff been « boni the State cf North Carolina for more than five ccnsecutive years orior to the commencement of this action, as slleged in tne com- plaint? Answer. Yes rd. Have the plaintiff und defendant seperated, and nave the plaintiff and defends lived seperate and apart for more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action, as &lleged in the complaint? Answer. Yes No. 150 North Caroline, In the Superior Court, Iredell County November Term,1924 Laura Ball vs UDGMENT J.P?.Ball This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His me 23 Honor, 4.lM.Stack, Judge Presiding, and +s Jury, and the jury having North C li orth Caroline, Superior Court, answered the issues submitted to them by the Court «as set out in Iredell County Nov. Term 1924 the record: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that L.C.Caldwell the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff : vs NON SsvuIT and defendent be and the same are hereby disolved, and the plaintiff L.O.White is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. iat : Mra. L.C.Caldwell administretrix of L.C.Caldwell ccmes into court and téakes 4 vcluntsary non suit. A.M.Steck It is therefore ordered tnet plaintiff's action be Judge Presiding ae and same is hereby non suited and that plaintiff's estate pay the costs. aeu.Stack,dudge Presiding CGESEELEEES CESS : e BGA aR & Net les Met ey $ + ie eee od ee ee we . No. 54 State FORGERY AND TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR vs Prayer for judgment heretofereocontinued and Sharpe Combs and coming on to be heard before the undersigned at this term, it is edjudgdd that he be sentenced i to jail of the county of Iredell for a period of a six months to be assigned to work on the public — roads of Iredell County. Capias not to issue in xxix case on express observance of the conditions imposed by Judge Harding and upon the further condition that he do not violate any of the laws of North Carolina for a period of five years from )the adjournment of this Court. iim. 156 AG 7 ~ fs CEE GE wt sz Ne BR AAA EAA REA A @ 2 ESECECGEETE we wie edd ceeeee North Cercline, In the Superior Court, No. 132 eae nee e W. B. “ambert $.. Attorney for plaintiff comes into open Court and Iredell Ccunty Nov. Term 1924 vs { makes motion to set aside verdict. The court in Amanda Lambert }§ its discretion sets aside the verdict. R.C.McConnell,sdmr. () of Thos. M.McCCiinell () This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday morning, ve i November 12th., 1924, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M. J.S.Washam and \( i .W.Bost () His x Pete fhis cause coming cn to be heard at this term of the Judge Presiding —— e Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, a.M.Steck, Judge rresiding ond it appearing to the court thet the parties hereto have compromised and adjusted their differences: mo. 17 / cAtGe preg * ee | ov of ti H.E.Lewis, Jessie M.Lewis C.4. McLelland C.McConnmell,ddmr. of Thos. M.McConnell reccver ne. defendants J-4.L.Deal, lies. /D.¥.Korris on VP Brv it Wa F.W. } ; idted dol j £.C.Ervin,M.S.Reirick,d.1.Cates,D.B. J.5.Washem and Bost the sum of Five Hundtfe lars with interest ; MorrAson,4.\. Combs H.L.Stevenson, J.&. i x - ee . 5 ; 5 Bass, Mrs. WKR.McLelland, sid M.Crawfcrd, from Nov. 3rd,1924 until paid and the cost of action to be taxed by T.M.Crawford, J.i.Bopa@,and 2./.Watts, Defendants It is therefore considered,ordered and adjudged the plaintiff k. v JUDGMENT the Clerk. No execution until after sixty days. A.M.Stack Tnois cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, &.M.Stack, judge presiding, at tnis Term cf the Court, and Judge rresiding being neard upon the complaint and answer of J.L.darris,R.H. Cline and L.«.Ervin,Commissioners of said drainage district,and consent: as individuals, and upon the demurrer of J.n.omitn,#. i. Lacky, ai . Jayden Clement & John a.Scott,dr H.D.bLacky,Cra Morrison,#klla Mcrrison,idée Morrison,W.E.Morrison, i Ae + e e © ° ttorneys for Plaintiff . +t 13 + 1 ' Wa ahal 7 ' : 4 leys a J.4A-Day, T.iiHealliburton,d.«a.slouu, &#.C.Nicholson,W.2.Morrison, R.L.feimster, F.4.Beal, L.N.Summers, J. Watts, 5.H.Cline, E.D. Brady, Duke Vic«ory, Eulalia McLellaid, d-~.Lewis, Jessie M. nR.Lee Wright & ‘ . . ee ‘ ; ‘ . ; ae : Lee srig 5a Lewis, C.a.kicLelland, J.a.L.letl, urs. L.5.Morrison,l.«.brvin, x7 T fr eo *. 2 ¥ 7 , . ‘ ‘ EE EE Sy = ~ B.C.Brvin, M.s.Hdedrick, J.I.Cates, L.B.Morrison, a.C.Ccmbs, attorneys for Defendant H.L.Stevenson, J.4.Bass, Mrs. W.h.McLelland, Sid Mi.Crawford,T.M Crawford, J-E.Boyd, and E.¥.Watts, and it appeuaring to tne Court thet the plaintiff's compluint does nct state facts suf- ficient tc constitute a cause cof uction against the defendants above named, other than the draifage commissicns demurring ‘to seid: complaint. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that said demurr cf the defendants be and the same is nereby gus tained N andthe plaintiff's action as to the defendants demurring is North Caro ine, In tne Superior Ccurt hereby dismissed. Iredell County November serm,192%4 It is further crdered that the ssid J.L.Hurris,RH. Tne Sigmon Keinhserdt Compeny,Inc., Cline and L.¥.Ervin, Commissioners of said Drainage District, Plaintiff forthwith prepure assessment rolls, in the event this has not vs already been done, file one copy thereof with the said Lrainege J.L.Herris,R.H.Cline, L.#.Ervin, Commissioners, und deliver to tue Clerk of the Superior Court casas Dlateict fe.d:. of (ivedenl a. cf Iredell County, North Caroline, three copies thereof, one of tacky, ord icrrisin, ai Seats ices, Which is to be delivered to the Sheriff cf Iredell County after T-Mdeliivurton, J-arsivan, 4.0, VY 2 the Clerk of the superior Court of said County nas’ appended there 7.4 Degl ,b.N-Summeré,, J-K.Watid Red Cline - to am order directing the collection of the assessments on séid Se eee rere cree te Homeland, ' , assesament roll for the years 1923 and 1924, as provided by statute Mi ice Ch sil, It is further ordered and decreed that the said J.L.darris,R.H, Cline, and L.#.Ervin, Commissioners, of said Dra insge District,forth- with advertise the bonds of said Drainage District as provided by statute and make a dilligent effort to sell the same and that the said commissioners ctherwise prcevide with the law in the organiza- tion of said drainage district to the end that said bonds may be sold and funds provided fcr the necessary expense in the construction of & new canél and improvements in the said Upper Third Creek Drainage District. It is further ordered that the said Drainage Commissioners ghall issue & warrant in favor of the Sigmon-Reinhardt Company, plaintiff contractors, #r any and 411 amounts which may be found to be due them upon the Treasurer of Iredell County, to be paid &8 soon as funds may come into the hands of said areasurer to the credit of said Drainage District, and report their action at the next regular term of the Superior Court of Iredell County. Judge Presiding Ps Cu Ce 6@eGeeee EGEESEGETEES No.20 North Garolina, In the Superior Court Iredelzi County November Term,1924 ’.C.Wooten & others ‘ \ Iredell County Parmers Unicon Warehouse Company j igned receivers of the Iredell Barmers Union ectively report that ‘they have converted into cash all tangible property of the Iredell Farmers Union Warehouse Company and have collected &ll ecccunts due the said company; and thet there are certain insolvent accounts due said company which the undersigned have been unable tc collect and they therefore respect~ fully pray the court for authority to sell the ssid insclvent accounts. , " WE re 5 , YBa Warencuse VOM. pariy resp Tne unders i 2.P.Dulin D . L . Rayme - No,20 North Carolina In the Superior Cou v% iredell County November Term,1924 W.C.Wooten & others vs : CRDER saUTHORIZING SALE OF UJ Iredell Parmers Union aCCOUNTS Warehouse Company i Upon consideration of the foregoing application of P.P.Dulin and D.L.Raymer, receivers of Iredell farmers Union Warehouse Company, it is hereby ordered by the Court that the said receivers be and tiuey are hereby authorized and empowered to sell all insolvent accounts owing to the said Iredell farmers Union Warehouse Company at public auction at the Courthouse door of Iredell County,North Garolina, after posting notice of such sale at the court house door and three Other public places in Iredell County for ten days imuediately pre- ceeding said sale, 4.MoStack Judge Presiding CeCe CCCRECEaEecace CECCCCESE: CEGéeces No. 23 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell Co nty November Term,1924 Mrs. Jettie Laura Ritchie vs C.M.Hampton and Wife, Lizzie Hampton, This cause coming on to be heard before Hon.é.li.Stack, Judge, and a jury, and the Jury for their verdict, having found that the plaintiff ang the defendants »O.léi.Hampton and wife ,Lizgzie Hampton, are tenunts in conmon of the land described in the com- Pleint and having further founda that the pleintiff, Jettie Laura Ritchie, is entitled to 8n Qnessixth undivided interest in said land in fee and thet the defefidants, O.M.Hampton and Wife ,Ligzie Hampton, are entitled to the other five-sixths undivided inter- est therein in fee, and it further appearing tc the Court by admissicns of the plaintiff and defendants thatthe land is inca p- &éble of actual partition and th: & Séle therecf is necessary for vartition, It is,therefore,ordered and udjudged that the plaintiff Jettie Laura Sitchie, and the defe: ! CC. Hampton and wife, Lizzie Hampton, are the oWners as tenants in conmszon in pcessess- ion and in fee of the Jands described in the petition, the plain- tiff being entitled to an One~sixth interest therein and the defendants, C.M.Hampton ana wife, being entitled to five-sixths interest therein, It is further ordered and adjudged that the seid land be sold for division at public s&le at the court house door in otatesville, Iredell County,N.C. after firest advertising the same at the court house dccr and thre tner public pleceg in s&id county for thirty days and cuce « week for four weeks in Some newspaper published in said county. It ig further or- dered and adjudged that Buren Jdurney and 3.iM.Land be,and they ure hereby appointed Commissioners of the Court to méke said sale and report their proceedings thereuwuder to the Clerk of the Ccurt. It is further ordered and edjudged that the said gale may take place any day of the week or month,except Sundays. f - * 5 Fifi The land herein directed to be sold is described as follows; Lot Number 15 in Block Number 12, and the northern half of Lot Number 14 in Block Number 12, being the same lotsa of land conveyed by J.a.Keller and wife to M.d., S.C. and M.li.lyon, by deed recorded in Book 67, page 695, cf the records of the heg- ister of Deeds of Iredell County, which said deed ig hereby referred to und made a pert .f for a full and particular descrip~ tion of said lets of land. [t is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the deferdants the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. Aeli.Stack dudge Presiding No.1Z0 North Carclina, Iredell County In the Supericr Ccurt, November Term,192¢ Mrs. Jettie Leura pene vs ; C.M.Hempton and wife, | Li “aie ros Is the plaintaff a tenant in cowmon with the defendants in the land deseribed in the complaint? ang. Yas ISsUESB / £. If so, what is the interest of the plaintiff in said land? Ans. One sixth of land described in the compls int. CCECECECEE CEGEECEE CES North Carolina, Iredell County November Term,1924 Mrs.Jettie Laura Ritchie, f vs S.P.Mékyhew and wife,augusta (j Meyhew,Oscar Odell Mayhew, a mincr about fourteen years of jf ége,and appearing herein by N.«aeBristol,Guardian ad Litem | This cause coming on to be heard befcre Hon.a.hi.Stack, Judge y triaél having been waived in open court by the pleintiff efendants, the Court finds the following fects: That on the eird day of Feb.1905, B.B.Lyon and wife con- veyed to M.J.Lyou, 5.C.Dyon and M.M.Lyon (three unmerried sisters) the following tract tract of land in Iredell County, N.C.3 adjoining the lands of Sallie Lyon and others and described follows: Begiiing at a stone, B.B.Lyon's corner, running S.4 i. 16 poles to & white cak, B.B.Iyon's corner; thence &. 25 poles to Oo @ stone, B.B.Iyon's corner;thence N. 4 BE. 16 poles to a stone in pard's line;thence West 25 poles to the beginning, containing 24% acres, more or less. and: That by virtue cf said deed, the said M.d.lyon,S.C. Lyon and M.lu.lyon were the owners as tenants in common in fee and in possession of said tract of land, each being entitled to an one- third undivided interest. ord: That the said M.d.Lyon died on or about the _ day of __1910, leaving a last will end testament, dated Sept. 24,1903, and & codicil to the same, dated May 11,1907, devising all of her real property to M.M.lyon and S.U.Lyon for life and for life of the sur- vivor and the remainder in fee to the plaintiff, Jettie Laura Ritchie. That the said will was duly probated on auge 68,1923, and is recorded in Will Book 9, pege 41 of the records of Iredell County. 4th. Theat at the. time of the death of the said M.J.Llyon,she left surviving her two sisters, lisM.Iyon and S.C.Lyon and Minnie L. Cashion(mcther of the plaintiff) who is a daughter of B.B.Llyon, and & deceased brother of M.dJ.lyon, and three children of her deceased brother, Cani Lyon, who are still living. oth. That thereafter, on cr about the Gey of _ 1916, M.iM.Lyon died, leaving a last will «end testament, dated Dec. 21,1914, devising all cf the real estate to her sister, S.C.Lyon for life and then to the defendant, Cscar Cdell isynew, provided he reach the age of twenty-one years and should he die before reaching the age cf twenty-one years, then to such of her nephews end nieces as are then living, which will was duly probated on the 2nd day of Jan.1922, and recorded in Will Book 8, page 476, of the records of Iredell County, and which said will is meade a part of this paragraph. 6th. That the said Oscar Odell Mayhew is still living and igs now about 14 years of age and is duly represented in this action by his duly appointed Guardian aa Litem, W.A.Bristol. 7th. That thereafter, on the 16th day of Peb. 1921, 8.C. lyon executed & deed (in consideration of her Support and meinten- ance of by the grantees) conveying @11 of the said land to §S.P. Mayhew and wife, Augusta Mayhew for life end the life of the surviv- or and the remainder in fee to Oscar Odell Mayhew, who is the seme person named in the will of M.M.Iyon and ig a son of S.P.Mayhew and In the Superior Court, Augusta Mayhew, which deed was recorded on Feb. 1921 which deed ig made a part of thig 6th. That at the time of the execution of the deed by S.C.Lyon to S.P.Méyhew et &l, the said S.C.Lyon was 78 years of age and that after the execution of said deed, she moved to the home of the Mayhews and coutinued to live with them until her death 11 months and 11 days thereafter, Wane 9th. Theat at the time of the execution of said deed by S.C.Lyon to &.P.Mayhew et al, the land above described was worth &t least the sum of $1500.00 or more and there was a4 dwelling on said land reiting for the sum of per month, which rent was received by the said S.C.Iyon and that gaia dwelling was rented for said sum during the period that the said 8.C.° Lyon was in the home of the said Maynhews. LOth. That the defendants, iisyhews, ere now in possession of the entire tract of lend. Upon the foregoing facts. the tintiff moves for judg- ment that she be declared the owner of an ne-third widivided inter=st in said lands in fe which moticn the ccurt denied, Thereupon, the rOing facts it was ordered ai L d a a 7. Judged that the plaintiff is entitled + all one-sixth idivided interest in fee in the nds above Scribed and that the de- fendants S.P.Msyhew and wife,are entitled te fj sixths inter- id ixths to Ul + U ests therein for life, with remsai) in said five s Oscar Odell Meyhew in fee. Upon admission in open court by the olainti and defen- dants that the lands cannot be actually partitioned wee the plaintiff and the defeidants witnor injury the interests of the parties, it is ve sred and adjudep 0 he said land be sold for divisi ublic sale a he } in Statesville,Iredell Cc the same at the court } in said county irty days and once & week for in some news oap. ) ished in sai unt; Lv 18.20 n& sure urney and £.li.Land be, are hereby app te ommissione of the Court to méxe S&le and report their proc ings hereunder to the Clerk of the Court. it is further ordered and adjudge nat said sale may tase place any day of the week cr mouth, exce t Sundays. It is further 2 ind adjudged that the p recover of the defendan he costs of this action t by the Clerk. la O A M.Stack Judge Presiding fo the foregoing judgment, plaintiff excepts ~ notice of appeal by plaintiff given am accepted in open court. Appeal bond fixed at $50.00, The summons, complaint, answer and this judg- ment shall constigute the case on appeal. aeloStack Judge Soe Gdd CEOGEOEE GEC COG lS bu cede Cee Ges Gece No. 118 P. L. Cartner vs 0.G.Sills and George Foard No. 119 L. V. Gartner vs 0.G.Sills and George Foard IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, NOVEMBER TERM, 1924, It appearing to the Court that the parties have compromised their differences, therefore, it is ordered that this action be dismissed and that the defendants pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, It appearing to the Court that the plaintirr and defendants have settled and compromised their differences, therefore, it is ordered by the Court that this action be dismissed and that the defendants pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, Wednesday, November iZth., 1924, No. 96 Sbatec Vs Geneva Hart She is sentenced to Jail for four months with: v County Pruereeioue to work her at the county Neel eur asta the expiration of thirth days from the adjournment of this court they may discharge her, provided she pays the cost of this® pros: ecution, otherwise, she must stay at the county home four months, No. 101 State vs Herman Pierce, The judgement heretofore rendered against Heyman Pierce sen- tencing him to the State's Prison for a period ‘of three years is set aside and the following judgement rendered, to wit: That he be sentenced to the common jail of the county of Trede Iredell for a period of tto years with leave to the County Commiss- toners to hire him to the superintendent of the chain gang or to the keeper of the count home, with further leave at the expira- tion of ninty days ( 90) to hire him to any other person that they may desire to hire him to, on the express condition that he first cause to be paid to the Clerk's [ffice the sum of $1000, one~half of which is to be paid to Mrs, Hazel Piprce, and th. other half to be invested for the benefit of her' and defendents child, Joe Pierce, and the Clerk of the Superior Court is hereby appointed & receiven to take charge of the $500 and disburse it for the benefit of said child according to his best Judgement, And on the further condition that if his wife, Hazel *lerce, shall obtain an absolute divorce from him that he Shell remarry Belle Stewart end live with her as ashusband ought to live with a wife and pro- perly support her and the child which he has begotten from her, provided, of course, she is willing to remarry him and live with him, The Commissioners are ordered to make no charge in this judg- ment until he has fully complied with the conditions impesea@ upon h A, M.Sitteicke 11) 7991 “Judge Presiding. 406 THRE thi et EHEILHIELIE EERE RES E SS State § ARSON vs ¢ Not a true bill found by the grand jury Rufus Sharpe } mone Etows een aT ROOST etna North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. Peoples Loan & Savings Bank, Inc., Statesville, N. C. -VS- This cause coming on to be heard before the under signed © Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the court that on the first day of Augist 1924, the plaintiff procured a summons and caused the same to be issued against the above name defendant, which said summons was made returnable on the------ day of August, 1924, and it further appearing to the court that on the 2nd, day of August 1924, the said summons was duly served on said defendant as is required by law and that a verified copy of complaint xfiled in the action on the 2nd day of September 1924, and it further appearing that this is an action for the breach of an expressed contract, to pay a sum of money fibseZutely fixed by said contract. The seme being for the recovery of $400.00 and the intrest thereon from FEbruary 6th, 1924; due by note and it further appering that on the ena day of September 1924, the plaintiff filed a verified complaint in this action and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return of said summons and the filing by the plaintiff of said verified complaint as aforesaid, the defendant having failed to appear and anstfer or demure to the complaint and it further appearing to the cuurt that the defendant is now due and owing the plaintiff the sum of $400.00 with interest thereon from the 6th day of February 1924, It is therefore considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover from the defendant the sum of $400.00 with in- terest thereon from the 6th day of February 1924, until paid, to- gether with the cost of this action to be taxed by the court. This the 10th day of November, 1924, *« J, A, Hartness er uperior Court. North Carolina, } 4 In the Superdor Court, Iredell County. Frank W. Elliott, $ vs } C. W. Smith, B. J. Blume, 4 J.E.Todle and Frank E.Brodnax } THIS CAUSE comifig on to be heard before the undersignd J.A. Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court for Iredell County, upon the motion of the plantiff for judgment by default against all of tk defendants, and being heard, and it appearing from an inspection of the record, and the 6ourt finding as afact that each of the defende% ants has been duly served with summons by delivery of a copy thereof also copy of the complaint, that more than twenty days have elapsed since such service upon each of them, that the time for answering has expired and no answer filed, that the plaintiff in due and prop@®n time filed his complaint, duly verified, in which he sues upon a note there set uot in full, being for Twenty-five hundred “ollars - subject to a payment of Two hundred and fifty Dollars - executed by C. W. Smith and B. J. Blume, endorsed by the’ two other defendants and by said “lume and sold for full value to the plaintiff, that sat note fell due on October 17th 1924 and was and still is unpaid and 4s an unconditional promice to pay the amount specified therein. It is now therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff Frank W. Elliott have and recovered judgment against the defendants C. W. Smith, B. J. Blvms, J.E. Toole and Frank &. Brodnax, jointly and severally, for the sym of Twenty- two hundred and fifty Dollars with interest thereon from Yetober 17h 1924 at six percent per annum until paid, together with the costs of this action. Done at office Statesville, N. C. this December lst 1924. J. A. Hartness Clerk -uperior Yourt. @Qve@ A HAKAN BAK K AN ANAL {QO Ka) QWQGCEROOLEULECLELE North Carolina, : In the Superior Court. Iredell County. } M. H. McKnight : } vs. { JUDGMENT. (4 1 Lee “ankin. This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, and it being heard and it appearing that summons was issued in the atove cause on September 15th 1923 and at the same time a writ of claim and delivery was issued for.one 1920 Model Ford(’Sedan car known as the Joe Freeze Sedan, which summons and writ of Claim and delivery were served on Lee Rankin on Sept. 15, 1925 and that the complaint duly verified was filed on Oct. 4, 1925 and it further appearing that the de- fendantgave a RES: ar the sum of $770.00 to hold the said car on Sept. 15,1923 with W. M. Compton as surty thereon. *t further appearing that no answer has been filed and it appearing that there was due the plaintiff the sum of #310.00 with interest thereon from Sept. 10, 1925 at six per cent per annum, It further appearing that since the filing of the complaint the defendant has paid the plaintiff the sum of $200.00 on the 3lst day of Jan. 1924, leaving a balance due of $110.00 with interest on the whole to that date and on balance. It is therefore ordered and ad- fudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant and his bondman, W. Ii. Compton, the sum of ‘} 110.00 with interest: from the 10th day of Sept.1925 at the rate of six per cent,and that the defendant and his bondman W. M. Compton be taxed with the cost of this action. This the lst day of December, 1924, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Tredell County. Before the Clerk. We D. McLelland vs UDGHE TN T W. R. MIlls and M. S. Brawley, Admrx. of R. V. Brawley. This cause coming on to be heard upon verified come plaint of the plaintiff, and it appearing that more than twenty days has elapsed since return date of summons and filing of the cémplaint, and no answer having been filed; and it appearing that said action was brought on a promissory note; and it appearing from said verified complaint and promissory note aforesaid that the defendants are in- debted to the plaintiff in the sum of $5722.78, after giving all cred- 4ts due them with interest on $5000.00 from the lst day of Oct. 1924, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendants, W. R. Mills and M. S. Brawley Admrx. of R. V. Brawley, for the sum of $5722.78, with interest on $5000.00 from the lst day of October, 1924, together with costs of this act@bon to be taxed by the Vlerk. This December lst, 1924. J. A. Hartness Clerk ouperior Court. QKI IY CKD YADA AA QOQOQKVOOUG (QA AIA ALAA K XK @QQQOQ COAL BRAK North Yarolina, 6 In the superior Court, Iredell County. }§ Before the Clerk, J. We. Copeland Vs ACTION FOR DIVORCE Mary Rivers Copeland This cause coming on to be heard upon motion of R. T. Weatherman, Att'y for J. W. Copeland, who comes into court representig the plaintiff, and moves that the plaintiff be allowed to take a non-suit, and being heard upon said motion: ordered, adjugded and decreed that the plains tiff be non-suited and the action be dismissed and the plaintiff ig taxed with the Hartness no We 4«@ North Carolina , Ty ‘he Superior Court, Before the Clerk, ’ t 4 Iredell County. Ballance~Sullivan Company, v8 JUDGMENT OF NON#SUIT, WT. Evams. The plaintiff in this cause voluntarily comes into court and asks permission to take a non-suit, the defendants and plain- tiff having settled all matters of difference between them growing out of this 5 It is therefipon ordered and adjudged that the plains tiff's cause of action be, and it is hereby dismissed and the costs of this action shall be paid by the said plaintiff. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superfor Court. By consent: Lewis & Lewis by H.E. Lewis, Attorneys for Plisintiff John A. Scott, Jr, Attorney for Defendent QQAQILWOSOEBGOOLEORL ORRGR000022RAOG@QOQ@GE North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk, Ballance-Sullivan Company, vs JUDGMEN T: W. A. Evans and wife, Alice Evans, C. B. Freeze and wife, C. E, Rreeze. St SN SE CE I EE This cause coming.on to be heard before the undersigned a % a i Clerk of the Superior Court, ana it appearing from the admission of the parties, that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum a 5 of $890.31 and that of said amount, as between themselves, W, A. Evans > and wife Alice Evans, are responsible for 407 of the defendants, C. RB, t Freeze and wife C. E, Preeze, are responsible for 60%, by virtue-of a written contract of partnership existing between the said defendants W. A. Evans and C. B. Preeze, bywhich it was agreed that thy should be f responsible for the debts of C. B. Freeze and sompany in that propors tion, and it appearing further to the Court that the defendant, $+. bh2zcee Evans has paid 40% of said amount, to-wit: $35 012; It is thereupon ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff 4 recover of the defendahts C 3. Freeze and w } KE, Freeze, as principals and | A. Eva and wife, Alice E as sureties, the ac ~ c vey - or ae a 7 as j sum of $538.29 and that W. A vans and ‘iice Evans are gure- ties of C. B. Freeze and wit i. Freeze for said amount and that execution shall first be issued igainst 1@ property of C Freeze and wife C. E. Freeze befo xxecution sha issue akbainst >» defend- A . he sy ¢ ant, W. A. Evans and wife J. A. Hartness © fal Clerk Superior Court. By Consent: WeA. Evans & Alice Evans C.B. Freeze & C.E. Freeze Lewis and Lewis Attys for Plaintiff. QQQQOVTASOVOOODL@OIDVCOAL AVE OVO XRG OOCIGAL North Carolina, } Before the by his next friend, and Mamie Fox. B. A. Troutman and L. L. Troutman, partners, trading and doing business under the firm name and style of Mooresville Furniture Company. In the superdor Court, nn } UiBIPK « SN Re I t appearing to the Court and is duly represente? Fox and Mamie Fox, who have been dulv and nad having examined witnesses for the purpose of enab I I to the bes + % » - 7 Sn 0 ttle all claims, mise and se of the Superior Court of ‘ 9 £ i - 1 . a personal Jury to the plaim- Or +}, IOodz & sia AShiwdy suffered an injuries over the body and herein; and it further agreed to compro- the defendant Dollars, and that ; che Yourt in order ¢ by reason cf the fact investagated the matters personal infjury,as there was action- , wv > learn the ex- the Court having made such investiga- who had personal knowledge of the ling the Court to determine whether tiff, minor, to compro~ or causes of action-which he now has or may hereafter have against the defendant by reason of said al- n leaged personal injuries for the sum of Two “undred ($200.00) SBollars; and the Court being of the opinion that it is to the best interest of mabters at issue in said action be the minor plainti@f accept and rece Two Hundred ($200.00) Dollars as a whatsoever which have heretofore or of the matters alleged in the compl injuries therein set forth. after having made such investagation the said minor plaintiff that the compromised and settled, and that ive from the defendant the sun of settlement in full for all damages which may hereafter arise by reason aint, and because of the personal 459 vVilt " . It si Therefore, Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed + at 1t is to the best interest of the Plaintiff, Bruner Fox, minor, that the matters at issue in the above entitled case be compromised and jetties and id settled, i that the said minor plaintiff receive and be paid by the defendant the sum of Two Hundred ($200.00) Dollars as a sebtlement in full for all damages whatsoever by reason of the personal injuries and of the matters T ailedged in the complaint; and itt is further Ordered Adjudged and De- ne creed at the agrsement of compromise and settlement heretofore made be-~ the parties hereto be, and the same is hereby in all things sanction ed and approved, and it is ordered » Adjudged and Decreed that the plains’ tiff recover of the defendant the sum tundred(%200.00) “ellars as a settlement in full for all damages whatsoever by reason 6f the per- sonal in} ‘ é » oan Pe \ $s Aallerec in the comp] aint: ; and the defendant upon the payment of thi: judgment shall be forever discharged from any ana all other or further liability by reason of 1€ persons injuries or other 7 matters alleged in the plaintiff's complain It further ordered that the plaintiff recover his costs of the defendant be taxed by the Clerk, QOOnR Aaw r+ » ™ Q é This the 22nd day of December,1924 North Carolina; }§ b In the Superior Court. Iredell County. }$ J. W. Copeland ) ( ‘ vs " NON#*SUIT. i t Mary Kivers Copeland The plaintiff having come into open court and taken a non-suit in the above entitled action, now comes the defendant through her attorney Jones, Williams & Jones of Ashville, N.C., and Grier & Grier of Statesvilb and takes a voluntary non-suit of her cause of action set up in her fur- ther defense to the plaintiff's alleged cause of action in the above en- titled cause, It is, therefore,considered, andjudged and decreed that the defendant8s cause of action set up in her further and separate defense to Plaintiff's alleged cause of action in the above entitled case be and the same is hereby non-sulted. J, A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court Tredell County. Jones, Williams & Jones and Gréépr& ofall d North Carolina, j In the ¥) Iredell County. } Before Henkel-Craig Company. vs Le ee EOL B ana John E, returnab the complaint was duly ee +4 jrorman* judgment id Judged iefendants five hundred five hundrea r Lives rown R. D. Jennings PO I OE I This cause coming on to be heard, before the undersignec Q5_ Superior Court ction was issued the 24th day of Novemb ay of Vecember, 1924and rved Nov.29,1924 that « and that the said complaint 2 this action was founded sfendants, for lays have elapsed since t answer to said complaint by the defend» the ti answering having exnvtr dered ordered and adjudged that the of answer it is further ordered Livestock Company recover of the . Brown, the sum of dollars and interest o ¢ In « - <n WNacam? , + > lollars from November 24, 1924 until 1d and for costs 3 Clerk against defendants, Hartness the Superior Court. North Carolina, } Tredell Henkel-=C Tk Fe 1 Henry J. Clerk of summons 1924, an defendan November the caus above q County. § the SUperior Court, Before the Clerk, raig Livestock Company & } ALY vs vill, R. D Hardin A i the Superior in this ac dad retunab] ts e ; >} xrdered recover of 4 u Henry J. Hardin ve twenty-two cents at Tovembhean ¢ $ ry hea fore Lz GO eel PAS she twe) December that the complaint ordered for want ~ Od the Court that 1dged ot s nr day of sma £ vy r indersicned the ovembher ‘ie is z the +hat 6A Y North Carolina, I ; Superior Court, North Carolina Superior Court, : Iredell County. } the Cleri-. Iredell Connty the Clerk, McLelland vs Stewart and Stewart, 8 EPS oe CO ee being heara before 4 in 4 1ed ok of Q Yr . c 3 the undersigned Clerk of ¢ 3 * Court on the 29th day of December, heafd before the the Court that the ane being the 5t M sav OL said mont 1, and it a whi ~ , + n+ arm , a " dey of November, 1924 Court that ons was sued on the 10th day of November, TY) ae > , c £ - m ‘ sa ; i ui the defenc and served on each of the defendants on the 17th y of November, 192. Novamhayw ©031. and that the return day set forth in the sw November ;: h November, 1924, and thé pile iff filed said return date C hat iefendantsare has expired and neglected than twenty d Pecover J ud ement of six per cent ver Brow indred fifty-three a credit of § 3 Second. For the liars orine of this action xed by the Clerk of Hartness tor Court Tredeli vounty. ipert Hartness : Superfor VYourt, YQQQOQ2Q XXX @ OYSY GY ex. » WOOD North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. Ww. D. McLelland ‘e vs Goodin This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard be- fore the undersigned Clerk of the Swperior Court on the 29th dag of December, 1924, the same being the 5th Monday of said month, and it appearing to the Court that thesummons was issued on the 12th day of the defendant on the 15th day of Nov- thta the return date sev forth in the summons November, 1924, and thet the plaintiff filed a on said return date, and that the defendant Jii intiff on ene no and interest on same from t 75th sale 3 ndebtedness was caused by the surety tiff having to pay said note ind at the aid amount on note, and that the defendant has failed and neg- an answer or demurr to said complaint, and that more than ave passed since said return date; 1erefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff Ula 2 InFf in on D id defendant, P. or the sum of $260.94, together with intereet Ya thereon at the rate of six per cent nnum from the 15th day of January, 1924 until Second . For the defendant to pay the costs of this tion to be taxéd by the Clerk of this Court, this December 29th, 1924. Je A. Hartness Clerk superior Court Iredell Younty (QASIM IMAI ASSASSIN ASAD. QDQIBIIALIMIIIGE North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. Frenk W.Elliott, vs The Zima Corporation, JUDGMENT CH eomith, J-f-eToCole ° and B.J.Blume This cause coming on tc be heard and being heard on this the 12th duy of January 1925 before the undersigned J,A.Hartness, Clerk cf the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and the plaintiff moving for judgment ageinst all of the defemants for want of an answer, ond it appesring to the Court and the Court finding 4s a fuct thut Summons was duly issued by this Court for each and 411 of the defendants on the 15th dey of December 1924 to Mecklenburg County where #11 of them reside, which was served on the 18th by the sheriff of said county by reading and delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the Secretary-Treus- urer of the Zima Corporetion und likewise « copy of the summons and complaint to each of the individuel defendants, that the Com- plaint duly verified was filed on the 15th 6f the seid month, that it declares upon three notes executed and delivered tohim by the Zima Corporation, endorsed by eéch of the other defendants, &ll of which are set out in full therein, that they are uncondi- tional promises to pay the sums of money therein stated and at the times stated, that «11 of suid notes are past due and are un- paid and due and owing to the plaintiff, that more than twenty days huve elupsed since the gervice of the summons und complaint und no answer has been filed by any of the defendents, and the pleintiff now present ng the three originel notes to the court, It is now therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the Pluintiff, Frank W.Zlliott, heve and recover of the defendants, The Zima Corporation, C.W.Smith,J.£.Toole and B. J.Blume, both jointly ond severally the sum of Bight Thousand, nine hundted and fifty-Dollsrs principal and one hundred ond thirty-six dollers end forty-one cents interest accrued to the date of this judgment, making & total of Nine Thousand end with interest on Bighty- eighty-six dollara and forty-one cents, from the 12th day of Jdunmary,1925, nine hundred and fifty dollars until paid, together with the cost of this action to be texed by the eourt. North Carolina, | Eastman, Holmes, Trading 4,mber Companye + - ~ i the same is hereby Done at office ,Statesville,N.C. the 12th of Janusry,1925, Slerk $ Har tne tourt ea eo a RR RK te eR KOR RR ROK RK ea ae In the Superior Yourt, County. § Before the Clerk. Gardiner and Company JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT 8 "oOo and stvle of Et This cause coming on to be heard before the undersign- ing t the Court from tl admission of the varties that ne to the Court from 16 in LO f jiant have settled all matters of difference be- -rowing out of the cause of action upon which this suit he plaintiff having requested permission to take a uit, and agreed to pay the costs. [t is thereupon, ordered and adjudged that this action iu io dismissed as upon judgment of non-suit, upon by the plaintiff. 4 - T an c lst day of January, 1925. J. A. Hartness Sas Clerk Superior Court. BY JA aL GOA ‘ (4 LA MAJA {DOAK DIBLILIVLIAADI IID ILIA (DBL A IKI Bee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, JANUARY TERM, 1925, MONDAY JANUARY 26th, 1925 North Cardbing, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) January Tern, 1925, Be it remembere that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolina, at the Court House in Statesville, N.C., on the Fifth Monday before the First Monday in March, 1925, the same being the 26th day of January, A.D. 1925, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., when and where His Honor, Thomas J. Shaw, Judge Presiding and holding the courts of the 15th Judicial District, Spring Term, 1925, is present and presiding, and the Hon. Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M.P.Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as Jyrors for first week of this tarmnof the Superior Court, to-wit: The following were drawn and sworn as Grand Jurors for the Term; W.C.Woody, J.D.Walden, L.G.Lambert, R.L.Levan, W.L.Woodward, W.F.Boger, N.A.Lewis, J.R.Caudle, Jow L, Harrison, R.W.Zeigler, S.F.Brown, J.R.L.McNeely, R.E.Jurney, Monroe Caldwell, T.0.Sherrill, R.A.Jordan, C.0.Rogers, and G.W.Baity. N. A. Lewis was appointed and sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. 0.B.Lazenby was sworn as 6fficer of the Grand Jury. B.F.McHargue, F.L.Howard and L.L.Lyons were returned "Not to be found,” in Iredell County. A.L.Stafferd, H.Roy Melcher, J.Fred Johnston and R.H. Baker were excused for lawful causes. A.J.Salley, J.D.Ramsey and D.C.Reece were returned sick. The following were returned and sworn as Pettit jurors for the term; B.P.Smith, H.C.King, T.O.Morrison, L.C.Peacock, Ralph M.Lazenby, C.P.Stroud, W.R.Moore, William Freeze, The following were sworn as tales jurors for the serm; M.C.Smith, R.M.Cloer, J.A.Reavis, W.D.Woody, J.W.Webb, W.Press Sharpe, Bo. 54 State vs Sharpe Combs No. ak State vs M.M. Johnson No. 72 State vs 0. G. Sills L. A. Boggs J. O. Gaither No.79 State vs Robert Williams Boss Reid No. 84 State vs ve John D.2MéGlamery No. 91 State vs Prank Myers No. 92 State vs Frank Myers Glenn Speaks Arlie Rash No. 106 State vs Robert Ruff No, 118 State vs J. C. Parker No. 112 State vs Squire Walk, alias ( Wade Walk : ' (4 i - : i ; ' ' Monday, January 26th., 1925. TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR Continued under former order. GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS Nol Prwosed With Leave. 2 MANSLAUGHTER Continued to next term. TO!.APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR Gontinued under former order. It is further ordered that the costs of this action be paid by the next twumm of Irddell Superior Court. AB@NDONMENT Alias Capias ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON Alias Capias FORCIBLE TRESPASS Alias Capias TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR an The defendant appeared and showed good behavior, and continued under former order. SIMPLE ASSULT Defendant came into open Court and through pene counsel J. H. Burke and R. T. Weatherman and peg not guilty of assult with deadly weapon but J Sackter of simple assult which plea is accepted by tne for the State. defenss! + the It is ordered and adjudged by the Court the on to pay a fine of Ten Dollars and the costs of this acti be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. BIGAMY and The defendang comes into open Court f his counsel Grier and Grier enters @ ples Se of bigamy as charged in the bill of s2m8 that the It is ordered and ddjudged ad defendant be imprisoned in the common J#." 6, County for a term of EIGHTEEN MONTHS, One 0”. work on the public roads of said County without felon stripes. MONDAY JANUARY 26th, 1925 No. 110 State vs W. A. Travis POSSESSING LIQUOR The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel Grier & Grier and J. H. Burke pleads not guilty of possessing liquor. The following Jurors were sworn and empannelled for their vedict; H. C. King, T. 0. Morrison, L. C. Peacock, R. M. Lacengy, C. P. Stroud, W. R. Moore William Freeze, M. C. Smith, R. M. Cloar, J. A. Reavis W. D. Woody and W. Press Sharpe. After hearing all the evidence the case was continued over to Tuesday Morning January, 27th, 1925 at 9:30 o'clock, A. M. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, January 27th, 1925, at 9:30 o'clock, A. M. Ba gaa. J Judge Pres ding and Holding Courts of 15th Budi¢ial District. TUBSDAY JANUARY 27th, 1925. This Honorable Court conveanss according to adjounment Tuesday Morning, January 27th, 1925, at 9:50 o'clock A. M. for the dispatch of business. Noy 116 State vs Frank Greene Noe 9S State Vs Vernie Anderson s No. 111 State Vs Tyree Johnson No. 109 State * vs A.Y.Brown No. 110 State vs W.A.Travis No. 1li7 + State VS L.J.Jordan No. 115 State Va Will Lackey oc Se OC OOO OS SS STORE BREAKING & LARCENCY The defendant comes into open court and #@ntengits plea of not guilty. Jury No. 2 after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the @efendant guilty of store breaking and larcency of a safe as charged in the bill of in- dictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THREE YEARS, and as- signed to work on the public roads for said county for said period, and to wear felon stripes, PERJURY The defendant comes into open court and through his counsel, J.G.Lewis & J.W.Sharpe, enters a plea of Nolo Gontendrec which plea is acceptedby the Solicitor, for the State, TRANSPORTING & POSSESSING LIQUOR Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. Bond $1000. adjudged sufficient. State's witness in this case Fannie Shuford called ani failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa Instanter Capiaa. State's witness, Fannie Shuford, arrested and re- manded in jail, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel, J.H.Burke, D.L.Raymer & P.P.Dulin, enters a plea of NOT GUILTY. Jury No. 2, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their vérdict, say they find the defendant NOT GUILTY. POSSESSING LIQUOR This case being continued over from Monday, Jane 26, 1925, jury No. 1 bring in for their verdict and say they find the @efendant guilty of posses~ sing liquor as charged in the bill of indictment. CARRYING CONCEALED WHAPON Thefeferdant comes into jopen Coprt and through his coundel, Prank Grier, enters a pies guilty as charge tment gz in’ the bill of indic e Court thet It is\ order id adjudgpd by f the @efendknt pay Kine of $68\00 ang the cast ° this action to be tkxed by the’ Clerl of thi Courte LARCENCY ds The defendant comes into open Court one ae guilty of larcency of an automobile as charged +n the bill of indictment. hat It is orderdd and adjudged by the Court 7 the defendant be imprisioned in the common ja of Iredell County for a term of SEGNSEBN more : and assigned to work on the public roads of § county for said peripd, and ft o wear felon stripest« oe TUESDAY, JANUARY 27, 1925. NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY, January Term - 1925. HON. THOS. J. SHAW, JUDGE PRESIDING: . We, the Grand Jury, for the January Term of Iredell County, Superior Court 1925, beg leave to submit the following report: We have acted upon-all bills sent before us by the solicitor and made due return of same to the Court. We visited the County Jail and found one white male and six colored males. Total - seven, The prisoners all reported that they were well fed and properly cared for. We found the jail in a sanitary condition. We visited the County Home by Committee and found eighteen white females, twelve white males, six colored females and eight colored malesg Total number of inmates being forty- four. The committee talked with the inmates and they all said they had plenty of nourishing food, well prepared and served to them. We find the house neatly kept, thereby, showing that the one big idea with the keeper is cleanliness of the inmates and premises. The Supt. reports to the Committee that the Home owns four head of horses, fourteen head ofmilk cows, eight of which are purebred Jerseys, and Holstein. He also reports sixty-five acres of wheat sown, fifty acres already in Clover and expects to sow this spring about forty acres moré, The farm shows that it is well cultivate@ and managed, We visited the Chaingang by Committee and found two white prisoners and ten colored. They report that they are all well fed and cared for and no complaint as to treatment. We found the camp in a sanitary condition. We find all the stock in good condition for work, with wagons, scrapes, plows, shovels, picks and other tools that are being used in the work. We visited the various offices in the Courthouse and found all offices in good condition and all records properly cared for and conveniently filed for those wanting to refer to same, We recommend to the County Commissioners that they have the jail repairedwhere prisoners tried to break out sometime back, Respectfully submitted, No. 114 State vs Bill Maxwell TUESDAY, JANUARY 27, 1925. { MURDER IN SECOND DEGREE }) The Solicitor of the State asks for murder in } the second degree. The defendant comes into open § Court and through his counsel John G. Lewis pleads not guilty. WEDNESDAY JANUARY 28, 1925. This Honorable Court conveanes according to adjournment Wednesday Morning, January 28, 1925, at 9 o'clock A. M. for the dispatch of business, No. 114 State a: Bill Waxwell MURDER Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior Court of Irede&#l] County beginning January 26, 1925, and sitting for the dis- patch of business, this the 28th day of Jan- uary, 1925. the Grand Jury of said Gourtyin a body, 18 present, returned into open COURT ' the following bill of indictment in words and figures as follows: INDICTMENT State of North eaciadaaans In the SuperiorCourt, Iredell County. Jan. Term, 1925. The Jurors for the State upon their oath present, that Bill Maxwell late of Iredell Couny on the 20th day of Dceember A.D. 1924, with force and arms, at and in the said county, fel- oniously, willfnily, and of his malice afore- thought, did kill and murder Charlie Freeman contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. ee ne ae Endorsed on the back the followimg words and figures, to-wit: No. 114 aii fOt+2=— State Judge Pr ding and Holding ourts against of 15th, fudicial District. Bill Maxwell te Ce ae ~— re em rm rr This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wederadayern'ug, Morning, January 28, 1925, 9 o'clock, A.M. INDICTMENT MURDER Witnesses. GenL. Gilbert Ed Daniels Atwell Davis John Kerr C..L. Whitley Those marked thus x endorsed and sent the Solici- tor and sworn and examined by,me, and this bill found le oe N. A. Lewis “Foréman Grand Jury. MURDBR By order of the Court, the defendant, Bill Max- well in custody of M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, was brought intoopen Court and being represented by counsel John G, Lewis was placed upon his arraingment. The prisoner, Bill Maxwell,being at the. bar in custody of M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County. Hon. Zeb. V. “ong, the Sol- 4citor for the State, after having examined the State witneeses out of Court on the Facts and truths, does not ask for murder in the First ) Degree as charged in the bill of indictment but for murder in the Second Degree with privileges of the Court. The Solicitor having called upon the defendant to stand and hold up his right hand, and having made known to him that he stood charged by the name of Bill Maxwell, in the in- aictment read to him of murder in the first degre Whereupon the prisoner plead not guilty and for his trial placed himself upon God and his Country No. 114 State vs Bill Maxwell SBR eM weet eR 474 WEDNESDAY JANUARY 28, 1925. MURDER The Prisoner being at the bar in the custody of m, p Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, whose pris- oner he is, the following Jurors were sworn and enpan- smith, W. D. Woody, W. M. Freeze, R. M. Cloer, W, R. Moore, W. Press Sharpe, C. P. Stroud, L. 0. Peacock, and H. C. King. ’ VERDICT: Guilty of Manslaughter. It is ordered, adjudged, considered and decreed by the Court that the prisoner, Bill Maxwell be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period. No. 114 State vs Bill Maxwell ce ee es ee ca et ee ee No. 110 POSSESS LIQUOR. State The evidence in this case being heard Tuesday Jan- vs uary 27, 1925., It is ordered and adjudged by the Court Ww. A. Travis that the defendant pay a fine of $500.00 and the: costs of this action. It is further ordered that the defend- ant be imprisoned in the common jail of Irdetl County for a term of FIVE MONTHS, and assigned to work on publica of said county for said period; capias to issue on motion of the Court, if he violate any of the Liquor laws within Three yearse No. 117 CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON. State The defendant comes into open Court and through his vs counsel Frank Grier, enters a plea of guilty of carry- L. J. Jordan ing concealed weapon as charged in the bill of indictment. T+ is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defend- antbe imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THREE MONTHS, and assigned to work on public roads of said county for said period. ; North Varolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) January Term, 1925. A.L. Hobbs BK. F. Wrenn and wife, Avis Shook Wrenn, Braxton Shook, Lelia Shook 4 4 vs § IUD at Bh. fs 4 Frank Shook and Bernice Shook. 4 This cause coming on to be heard,and being heard, and this Term of the Court, before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge presiding wpm on the whole record; and it appearing to the Court: that the defendants, Braxton Shook, Lelia Shook, Frank Shook, and Bernice Shook, have been duly served with swamons and a copy of the complaint in this cause, and are represented in this proceeding by their guardian ad litem, Z. V- Long,who was appointed such guardian by the Clerk of the Superior Court and it further appearing that said guardian ad liten has filed answer for said infant defendants admitting the allegations of the complaint; and it further appearing thet E.F.Wrenn and wife, Avis Shook Wrenn, Wer not to be found in Iredell County, and that service of summons as to them was made by publication,and that the time for said E.F.Wrenn and wife, Avis a Shook Wrenn,to answer has not expired; and it appearing that the plaintiff AL. Hobbs, and the late J.C.Tompson were tenants in common of a tract of lahd situated in Davidson Township, Iredell County adjoining the lends of C.E. Hobbs, Joe Fisher, and others,containg 148 acres,more OF aD said lands being specifically described by meets and bounds in the first paragraph of the complaint; and it further appearing that the said,J.C. Thompson and A. L. Hobbs did on the first day of January,1925,mutually agree on @ partition and disision of aaia lands between them, and wn said A.LHobbs did onsaid date execute and deliver a deed conveying to ghe said J.C.Thompson his share of said land,it being the tract of land containing 75 acres, more or less, and specifically described by meets and bounds in the second paragraph of the complaint; and it further ap- pearing that,owing to the inadvertence, ignorance and mistake of the said A.LHobbs and J.C.Thompson and the surveyor employed by them to run the lines drawn up the necessary papers,the said J.C.Thompson and wife failed to execute and deliver to the said A.L.Hobbs a deed for his,Hobbs'! share of said lands agreeably to the division made by the sabd A.L.Hobbs and J.C.Thompson,the share of the said A.L.Hoobs in said lands beifig spew ifically described;and it further apperring that the widow and all the kh heirs at law and next of kin of J.C.Thompson who are of age,have executed and delivered to A.L.Hobbs a deed confirming and conveying to him his sh- are in thelands agreeably to the division and partition of the same,made by the said A.L.Hobbsxand the late J.C.Thompson;and it further appearing that the plaintiff is the owner and is entitled to the possession of the 75-acrestract of land described in the third paragraph of the vomplaint and hereinafter described, free and clear from any and all claims on the part of the defendants, Baxton Shook, Lelia Shook,Frank Shook & Bernice Shook It is therefore, considered,adjudged and decreed that A.L.Hobbs is the owner and is entitled to the possession of the following described tract of land,situated in DavidsonnTownship, Iredell iCounty,N.C. adjoyning the lands of the late J. C. Thompson,J.S.Fisher et al,being his share in the division of the lands between the said A.L.Hobbs,and J.C.Thompson, bounded as follows, to-wit; Beginning at astake in Plylers line; thence N.81E, 102 poles to a stakein the edge of old field; thence N.68 poles to a stake in ditch, J.C.Thompson's line;thence N.78E. 26 poles to a stake in the center of Ramsey Creek, Thompson's corner;thencé down the creek N.24W. 65-2/3 poles to a stake in the creek; thence S.83¢E. 63-1/3 poles to apoplar, Thompson corner;thence S.25 poles to a stump; thence S.51E. 14% poles to a gum; thence Si1E.12 poles to a stome;thence S78W.57 poles to a stake, thence S. 64 poles to a stone; thence N.614E.41 poles to the mouth of ditch; thence 62#E.46 poles to a stone on the bank of the creek,J.S.Fisher's cornes;thence S67W. 128 poles to a red oak bush;thenceN. 22W. 10% poles to a stone; thence N.16W. 14 poles to a stone; thence 67W. 14 poles to a stone on public road, Plyler's corner; thence N51-3/5 poles to the be- ginning, containing 75 acres more or less. urther considered, adjudged and decreed that the defende nntal aedunan ahouk, Peaale Shook & Bernice Shook,convey the legal title Out standing in them in the above described lands to the said A.L.Hobbs and his heirs in fee-simple,free and discharge from all claims on their part, and Z.V.Long is hereby appointed a commissioner to execute and deliver said conveyance to the plaintiff, said defendants being ménors and in- said deed. pee 4 peagp te considered and adjudged that this cause be continu- ed as to defendants E. F. Wrenn and Wife,Avis Shook Wrenn, 28 the time for answering has not expired as to them. er Js Shaw 68 nge No. 93 State vs Vernie Anderson WEDNESDAY JANUARY 28, 1925 January Term, 1925 North Carolina, | Superior Court, Iredell County. | January Term, 1925. Uponthe convening of Court on Wednesday morning January 28, 1928, Hon. Harry P. Grier, member of the bar, in- forms the court of the sudden death of Mr. R. T. Weatherman, member of the Statesville Bar, and moved the court that the court adjourn for the term, out of respect to the memory of brother R. T. Weabherman, which motion was seconded by Zeb. vy. Long, member of the bar, and was promptly and unaminously adopted, whereup it was ordered by his Honor, Judge Thos. J. Shaw, that the said term of court would adjourn in honor and out of respect of the memory of Mr. Weatherman. PERJURY This case being heard Tuesday January 27, 1925, — It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the et fendant give bond for $200 to appear at each term < the Superior Court and show good behavior and that ‘A is attending school regularly, for three years. It 14 further ordered that the costs of this action be p® bythe next term of Court. pe E> oe me PS we North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Tredell County. }§ Befope the Clerk. Snider & Company H. C. Fox and wife, Mamisé Fox. - vs- JUDGMENT, § ' This cauee coming on to bp heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the parties plaintiff and defendant have compromised the matters in dispute between them in thésabove entitled cause, the plaintiff agreeing to withdraw all allegattons of fraud and to accept the sum of 75 per cent of the amount alleged to be due it by the de- fendant , H. C. Fox, which amonnt the defendants agree to pay, the defendants to pay the cost of this action ; and it further appearing that the defendants have paid to the plaintiff the said 75 per cent of the amount of plaintiff's claim, to-wit, $1,165.30, the receipt of which the plaintiff hereby acknowledges, It is therefore, considered and adjudged that the plain- tiff recover of the defendant the cost of this action and the said action be and the same is hereby dismissed, This the 16th day of February, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Coust Iredell County. By consent: Rendleman & Rendleman Attorneys for plaintiff. A. L. Starr and Grier & Grier Attorneys for defendant. ALG LLLLLL LIDGE CQLERQOOOCY QBCOE @Q@QOEQCCQO@E@ North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 Befere the Clerk. Statesville Lumber Company, -Vvs- JUDGMENT. W. L. Chester. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 6th day of January, 1925, plaintiff procured a summons to be issued against the defendant, returnable on the 17th day of January, 1925; and it furthePriappearing that on the 7th day of January, 1925, said summons was duly served on the defendant; and it further appearing that this is an action for a breach of an ex- press contract to pay absolutely a sum of money fixed by said contract, to-wit, for the recovery of $2,078.15 and interest thereon from August 15th, 1921 until paid; and it further appearing that on the 16th day of January, 1925, plaintiff obtained an order extending the time for fil- ing its complaint until the 23rd day of January, 1925, and that on the 22nd day of January, 1925, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in this tetio action, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return of said summons and the filing by plaintiff of the verified complaint as afiresaid; and that the defendant has failed to appear and answer or demur; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is now due and owing the plaintiff the sum of $2,076.15 with interest thereon from the 15th day ofvAugust, 1921, until paid. It is therefore, considered, adjudged and decreéd that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $2,076.15 with in- trest thereon from August 15th, 1921 until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. This the 16th day of February, 1925. J. A.?Hartness Clerk Superior Court. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MARGH TERM, 1925, MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1925. NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY: March Term, 1925, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begunand held in and for the County of Iredell, State of North Carolina, at the Courthouse in Statesville, N.C., on the first Monday after first Monday in March, 1925 the same being the 9th day of March, A¥DS, 1925, when and where his Honor Thomas J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and holding the Court of the 15th Ju- dicial district, Spring Term, 1925, is present and presiding. M.P.Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this term of the Superior Court, to-wit: The following were sworn as regular jurors for the term: F.A.Dunlap, A..F. (E.L.Bowles, H.E.Steele, R.C.Kinder, J.A.Maiden) /Alexander, G. W.Horton, E.W.Culbreth, R.A.Goodin, E.R.Rankin, L.R.Smith, S.0.Brown, M.C.Dagenhart, B.V.Reynolds, J.B.Rhyne, and J. E. Marlowe Clyde Wally, D.F.Robinson, C.S.Somersy and H.W.Honeycutt were &(Hugh Lt Sloop) returned, "Not to be found in Iredell County", { A.D.Brawley/was ex- cused on account of sigkness. W.M.Barringer was excused on account of being a florist. H.C.Newsome was excused on account of being a druggist. No. 22 4 Mrs. William Wallace } vs ) ' American Express Co. Continued by consent No. 83 R.F.Gwaltney Continued by consent vs R.H.Mason No. 90 4 Statesville Lumber Co} Continued for pleadings vs ' Eugene “olland { No. 176 F.E.Shinn Continued by consent vs O. Miller,et al No. 67 Continued by consent McKnight Augo Co. vs Rice & Ratledge No. 96 w.A,-oummers vs J. A. Snow NO 117 U.W.Malcon, W.F,.Malcom. vs Mooresville Mills No. 147 J.C.Brookshire vs F,M,.Wagner No. 162 Hazel Cline Pierce vs Herman Pierce No. 168 W.F.Bowie VS J.A.Gardner No. 159 Thomas J. Conger vs U.L.Roseman No. 169 Marlow Cotton Mills Vs Statesville Cotton Mills No. 170 D.L.“aymer vs Booz-Boyd Construc- tion Company No. 4 Merchants & Fammers Bank of Mooresville vs D. A. Beam & L.A. Beam No. 6 A.J.Keller & wife vs Charlie Hix & wife No. 8 W.T.Webster & W. J. Matheson vs J.5.Setzer No. 13 Statesville Lumber Company Vs Epps Harris & Ed Nicholson MARCH TERM MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1925, Continued by consent Continued by consent Continued by consent Continued for pleadings Continued by consent Continued by cqnsent Continued by consent Continued by consent Continued under former order Continued by consent } ‘ . i Continued under former order Continued MARCH TERM MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1925, No. 14 Jas C. Davis, Director General of Railway vs Cleveland Mfg. Company No. 15 4 J.C.Davis Director Genera} of Railway s { V Statesville Veneer Co. § No. D W.C.Wooten et al vs Iredell Farmers Union Warehouse No. 24 ‘ Statesville Lumber Co. vs L.W. Westmoreland No. 47 Mrs. M.E.Westmoreland VS J.A.“estmoreland No. 48 J.A.Westmoreland VS Mrs, M.E.Westmoreland No. 61 Hillfard Summers VS Bretude Summers No. 79 W.R,Keller VS James “4, Richardson No. 86 J.B. loupe VS De lla Houpe No. 88 & 4 HolsDi ckena /PaMmt.@ Dickens t J.P.Nicholson } No. 136 C.B.Freeze Vs . irs, “ohn L. Lowe No, 113 J.M.Deaton Vs Eugene Morrison Et al Continued Continued Continued under former order Continued for pleadings Continued Continued Continued Continued underformer order Continued Continued under former order Continued under former order Continued under former order MARCH TERM MONDAY, MARCH 9, 1925 No. 143 Continued under former order Fannie Dickens and R,L. Dickens vs M.S.Southe r and Pearl Souther ua 268 Continued by consent E.R.Brady Mcintyre vs Pruitt Hager and Guy Hager No. 160 Continued by consent W.C.Moore Vs B.G.Wilkinson A.BeJohnson versus Statesville Show Case Company is ordered placed on the motion docket. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday morning, March 10, 1925, at 9;30 O'clock, A.M. ~ Chek Fudge Presidjng and holding Courts of 15th Judicial District. oo ee MARCH TERM, 1925, TURSDAY MARCH 10, 1925 This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment at 9:30 0! : clock A.M. on the 10th day of March, 1925, for thedispatch of business. No. 144 E. g£. Sohaéfer vs 646 akan JUDGMENT OF NON SUIT This cause coming on for hearing before His Honor, Thomas J. Shaw, Judge presiding, the plaintiff, E.E.Schafer, comes into Court through his counsel and takes a voluntary non-suit. It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff be, and he is hereby non-suited and that the cost be taxed against the plaintiff and his bondsman, O.W.Henry, by the Clerk of this Court. Thomas J. Shaw, Judge Presiding NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY: March Term, 1925 No. 16 J.0O.Wilcox Vs JUDGMENT OF NON SUIT Robert McDaniels & Eve Speaks This cause coming for hearing at this term of the Court, before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff has failed to file in the cause a sub- stituted complaint for the one alleged to have been lost, as per order of the Court and that the plaintiff has failed to prosecute his cause. It is therefore ordered upon motion of the defendant's at- torney adjudged that the plaintiff be, and he is hereby, non-suited and that he be taxed with the cost of the action. Thos. J, Shaw. ~Tudge Presiding MARCH TERM, 1926, TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1925 North Carolina: In The Superior Court Iredell County: March Term, 1925 No. 158 S.J.Holiand, J.A.Sherrill, and C.A.Sherrill, Trading as Sherrill liotor Company vs O.B.EFller, F.J.#ller and JeI.Williams This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and 4t appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have compromised their differences out of Court and that the defendant has paid to the plain- tiff the amount sued for, but that no payment has been made of the costs in this action. And the plaintiff having come into Court and requested that he be allowed to take a non-suit. It is, thereupon, ordered and adjudged that tnis action be, and the same is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered and adjudged that the costs be paid, as agreed by the plaintiff and defendant and that if the defendant fails to pay the same within thirty days, then and in that event, the plaintiff shall pay the costs of this action. Thos. J. Shaw Judge Presiding. BO LIA GCPCETGIOCDDABOGLBE North Carolina: In The Superior Court Iredell County: March Term, 1925. No. 49 4 Worthington Pump and 4} Machinery Corp. { vs } J 8 D 8 2 Bae es Statesville Cotton Oil Company, Inc. ' This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and it appearing to the Court by the admission of the parties that plaintiff and defendant have agreed to compromise their differences, and that the defendant is indebted to and has agreed to pay the P the sum of $100.00 and the costs of this action, to be taxed bY the dot MARCH TERM, 1925, TUESDAY MARCH} 10, 1925. It is thereupon ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff fecover of the defendant the sum of $100.00, with interest thereon from the 9th day of “arch, 1925, until paid, and that the defendant pay the costs of this action, Thos, J, Shaw,% Judge Presiding By consent: John A. Scott, Jr., Attorney for aintiff Lewis and Lewis Attorneys for defendant BO LOK MIE QQ COL@OOE North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: March Term, 1925, No. 94 Industrial Products Corp. Vs SUDGH 2 3. F D.E.TurnerynA.M.Turner, and W.W.Turner, Trading as D.E.Turner & Co. O04 This cause coming on to be heard in the Superior Court be- fore His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that this is an appeal from the Court of the Justice of the Peace and that the plaintiff, appellant, has not perfected its or his appeal. It is therefore upon motion of A,L.Starr, Attorney for de- fendant, considered and adjudged that action upon appeal be dismis- sed, and that the plaintiff be, and is hereby, non-suited; that plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This 10th day of March, 1925. Thos. “.Shaw Judge Presiding (GDBOOQCAQLBOEBLOGOWLAE This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday morning, March 12, 1925, at 9:50 O'clock A.M. MARCH TERM 1925 WEDNESDAYMARCH 11, 1925 This Honorable convened according to adjournment at 9:30 O'clock A.M. on the llth day of March, 1925, for the dispatch of business, No. 141 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: March Term, 1925 Johnson Furniture Co. vs H.A.Alspaugh Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? Answer: Yes. $422.25, with interest from the 16th day of Jan, 1924, No. 141 North Carolina: In the Superior Cowt Iredell County: March ‘erm, 1925 Johnson Furniture Co. f vs 4 JVUuDau4s:EET H,A.Alspaugh 4 This cause coming on to be heard at the March Term of Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as set out in the record. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the court that the plain- tiff recover of the defendant the sum of $422.25 and interest thereon from the 16th day of January, 1924, until paid, together with the costs of this action as taxedby the Clerk of Court. Thos. J. Shaw This March 11, 1925. Judge Presiding March Term 1925 Wednesday, March 11, 1925 No. 19 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: March Term, 1925 Jessie L. Sherrill & Alva R. Sherrill Trading and doing business under the firm name of Sherrill Lumber Company, et al JUDGMENT a6 gusts i aise Carrie E. Goodin This cause coming on to be heard at “iis term of the Court before his Honor, Thomas J, Shaw, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues in favor of the plaintiffs as follows: "1. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiffs, Jessie L. Sherrill and Alva R. Sherrill, trading and doing business under the firm name of Sherrill Lumber Company and if so, in what amount? Answer: Yes, $1802.50 with interest at 6% per annum from Nov. 1, 1920. 2. Are the defendants now and have they been since Jan. 1, 1921, non-residents of the state of North Carolina? Answer: Yes. 3. Have the plaintiffs a lien for above amount upon the $1095.63 balance from foreclosure sale as alleged in 6th paragraph of the complaint? Answer: Yes" It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs, Jessie L. Sherrill and Alva K, Sherrill trading & doing business under the firm name of Sherrill Lumber Company recover of the defen- dants the sum of $1801.50 with interest thereon from Nov. 1, 1920 at the rate of 6% per annum until paid, together with the gosts of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. It is further adjudged and decreed by the Court that this judgment be, and the same is, declared a specific lien on the $1095.63, balance in hand of the said Jessie L, *herrill and Alva R Sherrill trading and doing business under the firm name of Sherrill Lumber Company from the proceeds of the sale of said property under the mortgage set forbh in the 6th paragraph of the complaint of this action. Thos. J. Shaw udge ‘res ng MARCH TERM 1925 WEDNESDAY MARCH 11, 1985 A No. 172 North Carolina: In the “uperior Court Iredell County: March Term 1925 Laura McDaniels vs Henry C. McDaniels JUDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows: FIRST: Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident and citizen of the state of ‘orth Carolina for two years prior to the beginning of this action as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes SECOND: Were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the complaint? ANSWER: Yes Dia the defendant, Henry C. MeDaniels commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? ANS\VER : Yes THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Laura McDaniels, and the defendant Henry C. McDaniels be, and the same are, hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff, Laura MeDaniels is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, Henry C. McDaniels. It is further ordered by the Court that the plaintiff be taxes wi th the costs of this action by the Clerk of this Court. Thos. J. Shaw ___ ——Judge Presiding 15th Judicial District @BQBRU CL 2 C@OCBOLOCLO@ No. 125 Continued Capolina Iron Works, Inc. vs E.L.Flowers Supply Co, No. 135 Continued Bessie Houston vs Ivey Houston MARCH TERM 1925 WEDNESDAY MARCH 11, 1925 No. 165 Continued Brown Construction Co, vs R.M.Hudson Co. & Maryland Casualty Co. Noe 175 Continued Vabiie’ Garter vs James Carter No. 163 Continued C.B.Freeze vs C.W.Jenkins « wife & D.K, Jenkins No. 171 Continued Nib Parker ye Susan Parker No. 157 Continued T.D.Shuford vs W.R.Hart, Summers and McAully & Stearns Bros., Inc. ( This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursdey, morning /\ March 12, 1925,\ at 9:30 O'clock A.M, Kivi 4 Meine ——Yudge Preéfding I5th Judic{al ~ District Holding Courts ~ + MARCH TERM 1925. THURSDAY} MARCH 12, 1925. This Honorable Court convened accdrding to adjournment at 9:30 O'clock A. M. on the 12th day of March 1925, for the dispatch of business a ° North Carolina 4} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 March Term, 1925. No. 167 4 Starr W. Shelley t vs Statesville Show Case Co. In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: YES $175.00 North Carolina Jn the Superior Court, ‘ (4 X March Term, 1925. Iredell Coumty. NO. 167 Starr W. Shelley 4 vs JU DGMBN TT. Statesville Show Case Co. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the jury having an- swered the issue submitted to them by the Court as set out in the record: and the Court having by consent reduced the verdict to $150. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred and Fifty Dollars, and the costs of thés action to be taxed by bhe Clerk of this Court. Thos. J. Shaw ‘Judge Presiding. COELQEOCOLAIRIQELAAD CQQLQOALIWE MARCH TERM, 1925 THURSDAY MARCH 12, 1925. No. 142 North arolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } March Term, 1925,. T.L. Dysard 4 4 vs R. P. Mitchell & wife. \ ISSUES ole Rre the defendants indebted to the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint, and if so, in what amount? Answer. Yes. $200.00 «20 Is the plaintiff indebted to the defendants as alleged in the answers, and if so, in what amount? Answer. No. No. 142 ' T.L. Dysard yt vs 4 R.P. Mitchell & wife? 4} Amelia Mitchell JUDGM EN T. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw,. Judge presiding and a jury at this term of th Court, and the Court having submitted the issues in said cause to the jury gaersehtout tmfhetrecord, and the jury for their verdict having an swered said issues in favbr of the plaintiff fixing the amount due the plaintiff from the defendant in the sum of Two Hundred Dollars, and it further apperring to the Court that the plaintiff filed a lien on the defendants house and lot, being the lands or lot described in the said lien and referred to in the pleadings in this cause, as provided by law for work and labor and material on said building or house: It is therefore, ordered:and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, T.L. Dysard, recover of the defendants, R.P. Mitchell & wif, Amelia Mitchell, the sum of Two Hundered Dollars, with interest from the 9th day of March 1925 until paid at the rate of six per cent annum, and the costs of this action to be taxed agathst°aeta defendants to be made up by the Cerk,and it dAepedyjndged that this judgment is a specific lien on said house and lot from date of August lst, 1925, the date off filing said lien. Thos. J. Shaw Judge Presiding « . MARCH TERM, 1925 Thursday March 12, 1825. Noe 1423 T. L. Dysard vs RE P. Michell &wife Amelia Mitchell. The defendant moves to set the verdict aside for errors com- ricea by the Court in the progress of the trial. Motion overruled, Defendant excepts. Judgment signed. Defendant excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court. Notive waived in open Court. Appeal bond fixed at $100.00 By consent of all parties defendant allowed 50 days after adjournment of Court to serve case on appeal, plaintiff allowed 30 days to serve counter- case. COL@OLWEAQQELQ@Q@L@ QQOYXDBL@QOLOLO@ In the Superior Court, No. 161 March Term, 1925. James W. Brown vs 186 U2 & T. O. Teague Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff and if so, in what amount? Answer, $349.20 No. 161 James W. Brown vs JUDGMENT. T. O. Teague This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Thos. Je Shaw and a jury and being heard and the jury having answered the issue submitted that the plaintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant, the sum of Three Hundred Forty-nine & 20/100 Dollars. It is ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Three Hundred Forty-nine & 20/100 Dollars and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of ti this Court. Thos. J. Shaw ~TJudge Presiding. GAXIZHAXAALII@ @vaaIasae~@ No. 175 North Carolina In the Superior Court, i 1( ; Iredell County, March Llerm, 1925. Starr W. Shelley vs Statesville,Show Case eee aoe Company. MARCH TERM, 1925 Thussday, March 12, 1925,. No.175 This cause coming on to bp heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County and being heard before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presining, and it appearing to the Court that this is an appeal by whe plaintiff from ahdéustice of the Peace Court, and that the plaintiff desires to with draw his appeal: It is therefore, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of safi Justice of the Peace Court be and the same is hereby affirmed, and this cause is dismissed from tis Court, and the plaintiff is to be taxed with the costs of this action incurred in this Court. Thos. J. Shaw Judge Presiding. No. 120 North Carolina } In the Superior Coutt, Iredell Gis. | March *erm, 1925. Alexander-Hamilton Institute -Vvs- J°0 D 822 RS 2. ts W. E. Webb This cause coming @n to be heard, and being heard at this term of Court before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and His Honor having submitted and the jury having answered the issues as follows, to-wit: ale c Was the contract, alleged in the complaint procured from defendant by the false and fraudlent representations of plaintiff's agent as alleged in the answer? Answer. Yes. aQe If so, did the defendant when he discovered that he had been defrauded, within a reasonable time thereafter, notify plaintiff that he would cancel the contract? Answer. No. w= What amount, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recekwe of defendant? : Answer. $50.00 MARCH TERM , 1925 THURSDAY, MARCH 12, 1925. No.120. It is thérefdre consindered and adjudged by the Court that plaintiff recoverfrom the defendant the sum of $50.00 with interest from March 9, 1925 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, together with the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Thos. J. Shaw udge es ng. No 120 4 Alexander-Hamilton Pe vs W. KE. Webb 4 The plaintiff moves to set aside the verdict for errors committed by the Court in the progress of the trial. Motion overruled, Plaintiff excepts. Judgment signed. Plaintiff excepts and appeals to Supreme Court. Notice Waived in open Court. Appeal bond fixed at $100, By consent of all parties: plaintiff allowed SO days to serve case on appeal, defendant allowed 30 days to serve countercase. CODQIGLOODADR QGQOMQALLGAB@ No. 97 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term, 1925. H,. F. Lee vs JUDGMENT. Charles C. Clark & wife, Mrs. Chas. Clarke. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court om motion of the attorney for plaintiff that the plaintiff asks that this cause be ré- manded to the Clerk of this Court for further hearing,and that the plaintd Plaintiff asks to amend his pleadings, which motions are not resisted by the counsel for the defendant: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be and the same is hereby remanded to the Clerk of this Court for further hearing, and the plaintiff is allowed twenty days fpom the adjournment of this Court to.file an amended complaint, and the de- fendants are allowed twenty days thereafter to file answer or demur to said amended complaint. Thos. J. Shaw Judge Presiding. MARCH TERM, 1925 THURSDAY, MARCH 12, 1925. No. 10 C.B.Stewart,Admr. of Carl Stewart, deceased. vs JUDGMENT VOLUNTARY NON#*SUIT BY PLAIBTIFF. Miller Mfg. Co. It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff comes into open Court through his counsel takes a voluntary non-suit, therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited and pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. No, 157 6 It is ordered that McAully was made a T. D. Shuford } party to the action and that Alias be va { served on him, W.eR.Hart and Summers and 4 McAtlly and Stearms Bros. } Pe ee ‘ (vache eee fens North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, { Iredell County. | March Term, 1925. No. 158 S.J.Holland, J.A.8herrill and G.A.Sherrill, Trading as Sherrill Motor Co. vs JUDGE BT ~ wa O.B. Eller, F. J. Hiller and J. I. Willadans. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have compromised their differences out of Court and that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the amount sued fow, but that no payment has been made of the costs in this action. Ana the plaintiff having come into Court and requested taht he be allowed to take a non-suit, It is thereupnon, ordered and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered and ad judged that the costs be paid, as agreed by the plaintiff and defendant and that if the defendant fails to pay the same within thirty days, then and in that event, the plaintiff shall pay the costs of this action. Thos J. Shaw udge es ng. QQOUCCOCCHOEEHOGOCEEE® CRCQOCWOE CELL North Carolina...) In the Superior Court, 4 Iredell Coumty, 4} Before the Clerk. YO /b6 T. F. Shoemaker ' 4 vs : JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT White Bus Line Inc. } This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, and it appemring to the Court that the defendant has paid the plaintiff $250.00 in settlement of all claims for personal injuries and damages, as set forth in the complaint filed in this action, the same being made & part herof, and that the costs, amounting to $5.20,has been paid. It is now, upon motion of John A. Scott, Jr. representing the plaintiff, and John M. Oglesby, representing the defendant, order- ed and adjudged that a non-suit be entered in this action, This the 10th day of March, 1925. : J. A. Hartness By Consent: Clerk Superfor Court. John A. Scott, Jr. Attorney for Plaintiff. ##% Jno. M. Oglesby. Attorney for defendant. @QQE.6 C6 QUOC MARGO@ CCRCEHCCE MOOG North Carolina, + In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. J. Ke. Morrison Grocery & Produce Company vs Ed Stockton, Victor Morrison, Hillard Byers, Bob Reeves, Will Reid and Hugh Carson, co- 4 4 Arthur McDowell, Will Rickert, Will Turner, 4 partners, trading as Peoples Cash Grocery Co.} This cause coming on to be heard before J. A.?Hartness, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard and it ape pearing to the Court that the time for filing answer to complaint in this cause of action has expired, and that no answer to aaid complaint has been filed, and it apperring further that siad action is based upon a stated account of indebtedness due by the defendants, and thet said complaint is duly verified: Now therefore, it is edjudgdd that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $524.20, with interest on said sum at the rate of six per cent per annum, from Apria 15, 1924, together with the costs of this action. This December 22nd, 1924. olen Sipsrtor Court er uperior Court, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. Merchants & Farmers Bank of Statesville. ve JUDGMENT, S. Re Morrison, J. A. Davidson, D. W. Woolen. and D. W. Woolen, Admr. of J. A. Wise. This cause coming on to be heard before J. A, Hartness, Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell Cpumty, and being heard and it ap- pearing to the Court that the time for filing answer to complaint in this cause this cause of ac‘ ion has expired, and that no amswer to said complaint has been filed; and it appearing further that said action is based up- on an indebtedness due by note and that satd complaint is duly verfied. Now, therefore, it is adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendants the sum of $2355.00 with interest on said sum from July lst, 1924, until paid, at the rate of six per cent per an- num, together with costs of this action. This March 15, 1925. J. A. Hartness er uperior Court. GROWL COL COCGL CO@COVECOQCU@@ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. J. A. Davidson vs. JUDGMENT. Fred H. Conger and Ella A. Conger This cause coming on to be heard and being neard pefore J. A. Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, 0” Monday the 23rd day of February, 1925, and it appearing to the Court thatvthis action was commenced on the sth day of January, 1925, end that the defendant accepted servise of summons on said date, and that plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in said action on the 14th day of January, 1925, and that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $526.43 together with interest thereon from the lst day of December, 1924, until paid at the rate of six Per cent per annum, the interest until today amounting to the sum of $7.01, 499 and the said defendants are furthernintiebted to said plaintiff in the sum of $50.00 open acount, making a total due by the defendants to the plaintiff the sum of $583.44 to gether with interest from this date of February 23, 1925cuntil paid, and that sied sums are certain, being due by note and open acount, and that said defendants have failed to file an answer or demurer to said complaint within the time allowed by law: ; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendants for the sum of $583.44 together with interest from the 23rd day off February, 1295, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that the defendants pay the costs offthis action to be taxed by the Clerk. Dated this the 23rd dap of February, 1925, “iF. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County. OGL GGOQOQAALL AA BO@ QLLEOCCAQVLQLL@O@ North Carolina, 4} { Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. In the Superior Court O. H. Hampton and wife, Lizzie Hampton. vs JUDGMENT NONSSUIT Q. D. Freeze and wife, E. V. Freeze, S. P. Mayhew and wife Augusta Mayhew and Augusta Mayhew Admx. of L. C. Lyon. 4 ) 4 { ' ) ) j : This cause coming on tb be heard before the undersigned Clerk of ths Superdor Court and it appearing to the Court that S. P. Mathew and wife, Augusta Mayhew and Augusta Mayhew, Administratrix of L. C. Lyons have voluntarily come into Court and made themselves parties defendant, in pursuance of a notice from the defendants, Q. D. Freeze and wife E. V. Freeze, to come in and defend action, and it further appearing that the plaintiffs and defendants have compromised and settled all differences between them by the payment to the plain- tiffs by the defendants, S. P. Mayhew, Augusta Mayhew and Auguste May~ hew Admx. of L. C. Lyon, of the sum of $318.00, which is in full sat- isfaction and discharge of all claims and demands of the plaintiffs defendants, Q. D. Freeze and wife said defendant, Mayhews, re against said defendants and of .the . E. V. Fresze, against the co-defendants, Hew é hew, Admx. of L. G. Lyons, and that the to pay the costs of this action. ¥ ; e mrther of their co-défendants, Mayhews, and that the defendants, May- hews, pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This the 23rd day of March, 1925. J. A, Hartness By consent: Clerk Superior VYourt. John A. Scott, Jr. and E.M. Land Attorneys for Piaintiffs. Grier and Grier Attorneys for Freezes Long x Jurney, by Z2.V. Long “Attorneys for Mayhews. @Q@QQQQ2QOEQQCQQL@EBL CQO QCCECRECOEOL Notth Carolina, } In the “uperior Court, Iredell County. § Mareh Term, 1925. A. L. Hobbs -vs- JUDGMENT #.F. Wrenn and wife, Avis Shook} Wrenn, Braxton Shook, Lelia 6 Shook, Frank Shook and Bernice{} Shook. ) This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court upon the whole record before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding and it appearing to the Yourt and the Yourt finds the following facts: That the defendants E. F. Wrenn and wife Avis Shook Wrenn have been duly served with summons by publication and that the complaint duly Veréfied was filed in this “ourt on December 24th, 1924; and it appear- ing that the plaintiff A. L. Hobbs and the late J. C. Thompson were tan- tants in common of the tract of land situated in Davidson Township, Iredell County, adjoining the lands of C. E. Hobbs, Joe Fisher and others, contain ing 148 acres, more or less, and being the identical tract of land des- cribed by meets and bounds in the first paragraph of the complaint; and it further appearing that the said J. C. Thompson amd A. lL. Hobbs did on the first day of Januaby, 1925:gutually agree on a partition and division of said land between them and that agpeeably thereto the said A. did on said date execute and deliver a deed conveyingto the said J. &- Thompson his share of said land, it being the tract of land specifically described by meets and bounds in the secomd paragraph of the complaint and it further appearing that,owing to the inadvertence, ignorance eT L. Hobbs ployed by them to run the lines and draw up the necessary papers, the said J. C. Thompson and wife failed to execute and deliver to the said A. L. Hobbs a deed for his, Hobbs' share of land agree- ably to the d&évision made by the said A.L. Hobbs and J. C. Thompson and thet the share of the said A. L. Hobbs in said land is the land specifbally described by meets and bomnds in the third paragraph of the complaint and hereinafter describedg and it further appearing that the widow and all heirs at law and next of kin of the said J.C. Thompson who are of age have executed and delivered to the said A.L. Hobbs a deed confirming and conveying to him his share of said land agreeably to the division and partition of the same by the said A.L. Hobbsand the late J. C. Thompson; and it further appearing that the plaintiff is the owner and is entitled to the possession of the 75 acre tract of land described in the third paragraph of the complaint and hereinafter described, free and clear from any and all claims on the part of the defendants FE. F. Wrenn and wife Avis Shook Wrenn. It is therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the said A. L. Hobbs is the owner and is entitled to the possesion of the following described tract of land situated in Davidson Township, Iredell County, North Carolina, adjoining the lands of the late J. C. Thompson J. S. Fisher, and others, being his share in the division of theland between A. L. Hobbs and the late J. C. Thompebn ,and bounded as follows: Bevinning at a stake in Plylers' line; themce N. 81 E. 102 poles to a stake in the edge of old field; thence N. 68 poles to a stake in ditch, J.C. Thompson's line; thenceN.78 E. 26bpoles to a stake in the center of Ramsey creek, Thompson's torner; thence down the creek N.24 W. 65-2/3 poles to a stake in the creek; thence S. 85, E. 60-1/3 pole to a poplar, Thompson's corner; thence 8. 25 poles to a stump; thence 8. 51 E. 14¢ poles to a gum; thence S. 1. E. 12 poles to a stone; thence S. 78 W. 57 poles to a stake: ; thencex64 poles toa stone; thene N. 614 E. 41 poles to the mouth of ditch; thence __ 324 BE. 46bpoles to a stone on the bamk of the creek, J. S&S. Fisher's corner; thence 8. 67 W. 128 poles to ared oak bush; thence N. 22 W. 10% poles to a stone; thence N. 16 W. 14 poles to a stone; thence _—-67 W. 14 poles to a stone on public road, Plyler's corner; thence N. 51-3/5 péles to the beginning, containing 75 acres, mpre or less. It is further considered, adjudged and decreed that the defendants E. F. Wrenn and wife Avis Shook Wrenn convey the legal title outstanding in them in the above described land to the said A. L. Hobbs and his heirs in fee simple, free and diecharged from any all claims on their part, and Z. V. Long is hereby appointed a commissioner to execute and deliver said conveyance to the said A. L.?Hobbs. It is further considered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Thos J. Shaw Judge Presiding. ranaaaaaaaqwn @aQL0EBB North Carolia, | In the Superior Court, § Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. R. Hoe & Company, Inc. VSe § JUDGES 2. q ) Statesville Sentinel Co. InGe This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before | J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County on the 24rd day of March, 1925, the same being the fourth Monday of said month, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was issued by the Clerk of this Court against the defendant on the 27th day of Dec- ember,1924, and served by personal service on the defendant on the 3lst day of December,1924, and that this is an action upon a conditional sale consract made by defendant to the plaintiff wherein the titlé to the personal property described in the complaint and in the said contract was retained in the plaintiff until fully paid for and until the con- ditions of said contract were fully performed by the defendant, and that the amounts due by the defendants to the phainftiff are definate and fix- ed amounts, and that the plaintiff filed a complaint duly verified on the 12th day of February,1925, and that the saidvdefendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $3187.75 together with interest thereon from the 24th day of October,1924,until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that the defendant, by consent,allowed the plaintiff until the said 12th day of February,1925 to file its complaint, and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to the complaint within the time allowed by law: Now therefore, it 1s considered and adjudged by the Yourt that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $3187.75 together with interest thereon from the 24th day of Oetober,1924 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and the costs of Bhis action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. It is further considered and adjudged by th e Court that this judgment is a specific lien upon the printing pres and other propert cribed in the above mentioned contract and in the complaint filed in this — causepand that all rights and equities of redemption of the defendant in ‘ed said property be and the same are hereby forever foreclosed, and it is | adjudged further that tfithe defendant fails to pay this judgment om wr before the Slst day of March,1925, that then and in that event J G. who is appointed Commissioner of the Court for that purpose, shall \ y dese ~ 503 said property to sale at public auttéion for cash after giving twenty days notice of said sale in the manner and way provided for the sale of personal property under mortgage and report his actions in the pre- mises to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Ippdell Comnty within ten days after sale, and this cause is retained fos further orders. This March 23, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superfor Yourt Iredell County. BQLOQDUK IY (JAF YIQ CBOQLRQCLLOCDEQLA® North arolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. }$ Before the Clerk. Standard Flour & Fedd Co. -vs- JUDGMENT. H. Re. Cowles. y ; : § ) f This cause coming on to be heare and being heard on*bhe Soth day of March,1925, before the undersigned Clerk Supertor Céurt Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 19th day of February,1925, the returned date of said sum- mons being on the ard day of _areh, 1925, and was duly served on the des- fendant before the return date of said summons, and verified complaint was filed in this action on the 3rd day of March,1925, and that the de-~ fendant is justly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $289.03, to- gether with interest from the 19th day of February,1925 at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, and s&&d amount is due on account, and that the defendant has failed to file an answer or demurer to said com- plaint: It 1s therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendant for the sum of $289.03 together with in- terest thereon atvthe rate of six per cent per annum, from the 19th day of February,2925, until paid, and that the gost of thia action be taxed against the defendant by dhe Clerk of this Court. This the 30th day of March, 1925. North Carolina, } : In the Superior Court ' In the superior North Sarasiete ° Iredell County. § Iredell County} } Before the Clerk, Carolina Motor Company ate aus taas. SG. thneee eka A. J. Anderson and Bristol Tharpe, Trustee and W. A. Bristol and T.N. ie i Brown and D. L. Brown trading as R. F. Gsultney T. N. Brown @ Son, Plaintiff. wii JUDGMENT. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the un | Jane Sowers or M. J. Sowers the undersigned Cierk of the Superior Court of Irede}1l County on Monday, the 30th day of March,1925, and it appearing to the Court that summons This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on the 6th was issued against said defendant in this action on the 12th day of November day of April, 1925 before the undersigned J. A. Hartness, Clerk of the 1924, and duly served by personal servise, and that aduly verified complaint Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that the was filed in said cause on the 25th day of November,1924, and that the de- summons in this action was issued on. the 28th day of February, 1925 and returnable on the 10th d of M 925; fendant is indebted to the plaintiff on notes in the sum of $625.00 to- ay areh 1925; And it further appearing to the Court that th a ~ gether with interest thereon from the 8th day of April,1924, at the rate , 5. oe ° a e said sum mons and a verifier co ofthe complaint filed in this action was of six per cent per annum until paid, and that the said defendant has PY ' served on the defendant on the 28 day of February, 1925 by reading said failed to file an answer or demure within the time allowed by law: summons and said werified copy of the complaint to the defendnant and by Now therefore,it is ordered and adjudged by the Court leaving a copy of said summons and complaint with the said defendant; that the plaintiff recover gjfidgment against the defen@ant in the sum of And it further appearing to the Court that more than twenty $625.00 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per pOKe days have elapsed since the return date of said summons and no answer or annum from the 8th day of April,1924, until paid and that the costs of demurer has been filed by the defendant and it further appearing to the this action be taxed against said defendant. Gourt that the said defendant is justly indebted to the plaintiff J. W. This the 30th day of Mareh, 1925. Redman in the sum of $9,646.53 with interest thereon from the 27th day of February 1925, until paid; That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff Chas. C. J. & Hartness Tharpe in the sum of $1,366.50 with interest thereon from the 27th Clerk Superior court Iredell County. day of February 1925, until paid; That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff a, J, Anderson in the sum of $422.00 and interest thereon from the 27thi.day QQREROLWIERBURCCBIOALAIOIE QQIASYILLA SLI IIANA AD of February, 1925 until paid; putes: That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff W. A. Bristol in the sum of $600.00 and interest thereon from April 14, 1925; That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff T. N. Brown and D. L. Brown, trading as T. N. Brown & Son in the sum of $43.74 and interest thereon from February 12, 1925 until paid. And it further appearing to the Court thet the indebted- ness of the plaintiff J. W. Redman is secured by a mortgage deed of one on certain lands as described in the complaint of the plaintiffs of the plaintiff to M. E. Redman trustee and that the indebtedness Chas. C. Tharpe and the indebtness of the plaintiff A. J. Anderson is secured by a mortgage deed of trust on certain lands described in the complaint’of the plaintiffs and the indebtness of the plaintiff w. A. Bristol is secured by a mortgage deed on said land and that the 4ndebtness of the plaintiff T. N. Brown and D. L. Brown, trading as 7. N. Brown &Son is a judgment against the defendant. And it further appearing to the Court that the lien of the plaintiff J. W. Redman is a first lien and the lien of the plaintiff Chas. C. Tharpe and A. J. Anderson is a second lien and that the lien of the plaintiff W. A. Bristol is a third lien and that the lien of the plaintiff T. N.Brown &Son is a judgment lien subject to the lien of the aforesaid mortgagees or it 1s therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff J. . Redman recover of the defendant the sum of 49,646.53 with interest thereon from February 27,1925 which shall be a first lien against the property described in the complaint; Tat the Plaintiff Chas, C. Tharpe recover of the defendant the sum of $1,366.50 with interest thereon from the 27 day of February 1925 until paid; That the plaintiff A. J. Anderson recover of the defendant the sum of $422.00 with interest thereon from the 27th day of February 1925 until paid, which shall constitute a second lien against the defendant; That the plaintiff W. A. Bristol recover of the defendant the sum of $600.00 with interest thereon from the 14th day of April, 1924 which shall constitute a third claim against the defendant; That the plaintiff T. N. Brown & Son recover of the defendnat the sum of $43.74 and interset thereon from February 12, 1925 until paid, against the defendant and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Court and for such other relief as the plaintiff may be entitled. It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this judgment be a specific lien upon the land described in the complaint of the plaintiffs; that all rights and equities of redemption of the defendant in said property be and the same are here= by forever foreclosed; It is further adjudged that P. P. Dulin be and he is ah by constituted a Commissioner of this Court to sell the land pelonging who the defendant as described in the complaint filed in this cause ae public auction for cash after due advertisement as required by law and after giving notice as required by law, at the Courthouse Door in the City of Stetasville, N. C. or Thursday, the 9th day of May, 1925 at 12;0%clock Noon and report his action in the premises to the Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County within ten days af- ter sale. It is further considered, ordered and adjudged that the said commissioner shall pay out of the proceeds arrising from said sale, the cost and expense of said sale and shall pay to the plain- tiffs the amounts due them according to the prtorities of their lien and the remainder, if any, to the defendant; It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs or either of them may be allowed to bid on the land of the defendant's at the sale of said commissioner. And this cause is retained for further orders. This the 6th day of April, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court lredellCounty. @Q@QECQQCEQQQOE2LGLEOQB@ @QQQ@O@ACLAVGQQA QQQQEEQEQCOCAA North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell Coumty, | March Term, 1925. Statesville Lumber Company against N. G. Nolmes and W. R. Holmes. Statesville Lumber Company against N. G. Holmes, J. L. Holmes and W. R. Holmes. Statesville Lumber Company against N. G. Holmes, J. H. Fraley and W. R. Holmes. Statesville Lumber Company against N.G.Holmes. ORDER OF REFERENCE. this This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that all of the parties in the above entitled four actions have consented that said actions may be consolidated for the purpose of trial only; and it further appearing that all of the parties have consented that all mat- ters in dispute may be referréd to 4 Referee for determination, It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the saod four actinns actions be consolidated for the purposedof trial, and that John A. Scott be and he is hereby appointed Referee to hear and determine all matters in controversy in all of the said actions and that he report his find- ings of facts and conclusions of law to this Court as early as prac- tical. Thos. J. Shaw Judge Presiding. By consent: jrier & Grier Attorneys for plaintifr + P, P. Dulin and KE, M. Land. Attorneys for defendants. CULE WALOKMCLGOCABOBOQE QL@OCOQOOC EQ CO® COCK ( (aXaTOY he (fa North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. P. P. Dulin, Reveiver of the Cooper Furniture Company, Inc. CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT. I, J. E. Deitz, defendant in the above entitled casé6, hereby confess judgment in favor of P. P. Dulin, Receiver of the Cooper Furniture Company, Inc., the plaintiff above named, for the sum of $1996.40, and hereby authorize the entry of judgment against J. E. Deitz on the 28th day of April, 1925. The confession of this judgment is for a debt now just- ly due from the defendant to the plaintrff, arising from the following facts: the defendant is due the plaintiff $1996.40 on open account, as 880% shown by the books of the Company, which said sum is due to the plain- tiff, over and above all just demands that J. Es Deitz has against the Cooper Furniture Company. J. E. Deitz. North Carolina, } i Iredell County. } J. E. Deitz being duly sworn, says that the facts stated in the above confession are true and that the amount of judgment confedsed is justly due the plaintiff, Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 28th day of April, 1925. —__—~-J-_ A. Hartness Clerk Superior Yourt. CLERK'S DECREE Upon the foregoing Confession of Judgment, it is ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the plaintiff the sum of $1996.40, with interest from April 28th, 1925, and the judgment be entered upon the record. April 28th, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, @QCUR C24 DER OGO ( @B CEOECQLQCLQEOC10G@@Q @Q@QQQQX LU TAQ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. W. D. McLe&land vs c0.D Oo M9 Bak t. David Adams and R. B. Adams. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard on 27th day of April 1925, before J. A. Hartness, Cjerk Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons was issued in this action on the 17th day of March, 1925, and Wastserved by personal service on said defendants on the 18th day of March, 1925, and that a duly verified complaint was filed in this action by the plaintiff on the 28th day of March 1925, the return date being the 3lst day of March, 1925, and that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $699.92 together with interest thereon from the 6th day of Dee- ember, 1924, until paid, and the said amount is due by note, being a certain fixed amount, and that said defendants have failed to file an ha answer or demur to said complaint within the time allowed by law: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $699.92 together with interest thereon at the rate of six oer cent per annum from the 6th day of December, 1924 until paid, and that the defendanmts pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Vourt. This April 27, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County/ QOL ALAILILLAAS AMA LOOKS (ADEA AA CCRQ Ca North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredelll County. | Before the Clerk. Mrs, Maud Caudé1l Vs. JUDGE EA Ts J. M. Alexander This cause coming on the be heard before the undersigned Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has not filed and answer and makes no denial of the allegations of the complaint: and it further appearing to the plaintiff and the defendant havé»:compromised all matters growing out the matters and things alleged in the complaint by the defendant pay- ing the plaintiff the sum of Seventeen Hundred Fifty ($1750.00) Dol- lars, and that siad payment is accepted by the plaintiff as a full, complete and final settlement of all claims and demands that she has against the defendant by reason of the matters and things alledged in the complaint; and it further appearing that said amount has peen duly paid, It is therefore, conaidered, adjudged and decreed that the above settlement be, and the same,is, hereby approved, and that the cost of this action be paid by the defendant. This April 27, 1925. By consent of: Grier and Grier torneys for Plaintirfr Lewis and Lewis Attorneys for Defendant. J. & Hartness lit Clerk Superior Court Trede11 county, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT; MAY TERM, 1925 MONDAY, MAY is, 1925, NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY: May Tern, 1925. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held inrand for the county of Iredell, State ofNorth Carolina, at the Court House in Statesville, N,C., on the 1th Monday after the lst Monday in March, 1925, the same being the 18th day of May, A.D., 1925,when and where His Honor, Thomas J. Shaw, Judge Pre- siding and holding courts for the l15thJudicial District, Spring Term, 1925, is presentand presiding, and the Hon. Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor is presentand prosecuting in the name of the State. li, P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is presentand returned into open Court the names of the follow- ing good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term of the Superior Court, to-wit: The following were drewn and sworn as grand jurors for the term: J.L.Donald, JF, . McGraw, Frank Guy, M.C.Smith, C.S.Wilson, Jam F.Cash, fq 32 Om fe? £ T r omn ~ T Grose, T.G. Deaton, R.C.Gabriel, L, @.Thompson, ms Thomas, L, F, Warren, J. T. Smith, P. B. Lackey, C. H. Thomas, G.W. Re gr 2 Wilkinson, J. T. Brantley,/RK.C. Little. R.C. Little was appointed and sworn as foreman of the Grand Jury. O. B. Lazenby was appointed as officer of the grand jurye No 54 TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR State Continued under former order. vs Sharpe Combs No 72 MANSLAUGHTER State Continued by consent vs 06G.Sills, L.A. Boggs, J.O0.Gaither To appear and show good behaviour Beats The serene. Kobert Williams, called and vs failed, Judgment, Nisi Sci Fa and Caplas. : The defendant, Boss Reid, appeared and oe hee showed good behavior. Continued under for- ee mer order. ~ No 84 State vs John D. McGlamery No 91 State Vs Frank Myers No 92 State VS Frank Myers, Glen Speaks, Arlie Rash. No 93 Anderson No 106 o+9t6¢ VS Robert Ruff Bo 187 a + 4 State We % Vo T a 4 . Jvames onarvde, : I Dewey Sharpe. No 130 State rE] Vw Cooper Holland No. 53 State vs R. 0. Kyles { ( ' 4 { i { § MAY TERM 1985, MONDAY, MAY 18, ®9 2 5. ABANDONMENT Alias Capias ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, ALLARXLAPLRB » Nol Prosed With Leave FORCIBLE TRESPASS ALinaxLAPLAR Nol Prbised With Leave. TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOUB Defendant called and failed, Judgment, Nis#® Sci Fa and Capias. TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR Defendant appearedand showed good behaviour, Continued under former order, STORE BREAKING, LARCENCY AND RECEIVING. The defendant, Dewey Sharpe comes into open Court and through his counsels, J.W. Sharpe and Buren Jurney, enters a plea of guilty as to fbrcible trespass which plea is accepted, by the Solicitor for State. Nol Prosed with leave, as to the de- fendant, James Sharpe. TRANSPORT, POSSESS AND SELL LIQUOR Defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel, John L, David, enters a plea of guilty of transporting, possessing and selling liquor as charged in the warrant.# It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the com- mon jail of Iredell County fora period of TEN MONTHS, and assigned to work on public roads of said county for said period; not to wear stripes. FALSE PRETENCE Continued under former order. GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS. Continued under former order. ‘This Honorable Court Takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, May 19, 1925, at 9:30 O'clock A.M. “his Honorable Court conveaned Tuesday “May 19, 1925. according to adjournment Tuesday Morning, Mayul®y 1925, a679:30 o'clock A. MZ for the dis- patch of business. No, 127 State vs Dewey Sharpe No. 123 State vs Tom Macketee No. 122 State vs Roy Honeycutt No. 126 State vs Grady “enson No. 121 State vs G@enn Evans No. 113 State vs Gladys Phifer — ' ' This cause being heard Monday May 18, 1925, it therefore ordered and adiudged by the Yourt that the. defenfiant pay the cost of this action and that he be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX MONTHS, and assigned to work on public roads of said county for saad period, capias to issue at any time in thepe years by order of the Court, ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON,©rORCIBLE TRESPASS AND HOUSEYBREAKING,. The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel John L. Davis enters a plsa of not guilty. A jury being sworn and after hearing the evidence return a verdict,giilty! of assult wifh deadly weapon and forcible trespass, not guilty of house-breaking. It is ordered and ddjudged by the Court thet the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for astéermedftSIX MONTHS, and assigne- ed to work on publiecroads of said county for said period, not to wear stripes. HOUSE*BREAKING AND LARCENY. Nol Prosed With “eave, LARCENY The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel Buren Jurney pleads not guilty of larceny. A jury after hearing the evidence renders a verdict of not guilty. ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel George Morrow pleads guilty of assult with deadly weapon on Charles Thomas as charged in })the bill of indictment. ' ‘ ' { ) ‘ ) ¥ 4 4 It is opdered and adijudced by the Court that judgment be suspended on payment of the-cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, FORGERY Con tinued under former order. FORGERY The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel BurefeJurneyventers a plea of guilty (§ of forcible trespass which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. P Judgment continued until Monday May 25, 1925. nena DIS ELL DLS TT OLE No. 120 State vs Lois Thompson No. 124 State vs MeMillian Jones James Rhinehardt No 119 State vs Tom Taylor Melvin Tucker OO ee ee TUESDAY MAY 19, 1925. FORGERY The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel John L. Davis pleads guilty of forcible trespass,which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR MONTHS, and as- signed to work on public roads of said county for said period, not to wear stripes. STORE- BREAKING. The defendants come into open Court and through their counsel Buren Jurney plead not guilty. A jury after hearing the evidence in this case returns . vendict,guilty of attempt to break in a store, Judgment continued until Monday May 25, 1925, TRANSPORT, POSSESS AND SELL LIQUOR. The defendants come into open Court and through thier counsels JseWe Sharpe, Judge Brock and plead not guilty of transporting and poss- essing and selling liquor. A jury after hearing the evidence finds the defendants guilty of transport- ing and possessing liguor and not guilty of selling. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendants be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of EIGHTEEN MONTHS, and assigned to work on public roads of said county for said period; not to wear stripes. Defendants in open Court give notice of appeal to Supreme Court for errors committed by cgurt, as- signed and to be assigned. Notice of appea waived. By consent defendants allowed GO days to make out f on appeal and the State allowed days there- for counter case or exception. Defendants each give $4,000.00 appearence bond. Appeal bond $100 ' This Honorable Court takes a recess fimbil Monday Morning May 25, 1925, at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. Judge Pres ng and Holding of 15thYJudicial District. MAY TERM, 1925. REFQORT OF GRAND ‘IURY TO THE SUPERIOR COURT: MAY TERM, 1925 IREDELL COUNTY BEGINNING MAY 18, 1925, 10:00 A. M THOS. J. SHAW, JUDGE PRESIDING. We, the grand jurors for the May Term, 1925 of Iredell Sup- 6rtioryCourt respectfully submit the following report: That we have passed on all bills sent to us by the Solicitor and made returns of same to the Court. That we visited the County Home by Committee and found 45 inmates as follows: 11 white males,18 white females,9 colored males, and 7 colored females. The committee talked with several inmates who stated that they were furnished plenty of well prepared and nuurishing food; and that they were kindly treated. We found the buildings and grounds neatly kept and the stock and tools tn good condition. We visited the county convict camp by comittee and found 11 prisoners--1 white and 10 colored-- all males. The kitchen and the quarters for the guards were in good condition. We found that the mate tresses and bed springs in the convict sleeping quarters were badly worn and we pecommend that same be replased with new ones. We visited the jail by committee and found 19 prisoners as folaows: 10 white males and 8 colored males and 1 colored female. We found the jail well kept and the prisoners properly cared for. We recommned, however, that the windows on the first and second floors be screened, and that 5 showerssprays be furnished. We also visited by committee all the offices in the court- ~~ house and all appear to be well kept. Respectfully submitted, this May 19 1925. R. GC. Little Foreman of the Grand Jury Afeer hearing the report read His Honor excused the grand jury until further notified. This Honotable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning May 25, 1925, at 10:00 ofcloek A. M. * North Carolina, | Iredell County. § MAY TERM, 1925. Monday May 25, 1925. In the Superior Court, May Term, 1925. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. Monday morning, May 25, 1925, when and where His Honor Thos. J.oShaw, Judge Presiding and hooding the Courts of the 15th Jud- {cial District of North Carolina, is present and presiding, this the secona week for civil cases at May Term, 1925. M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good men to serve as jupors of this Court for the second week civil cases, to-wit: er C. Dunlop,F.A.Summers, , Jtfo.W.Cash, C. D. Ostwalt, J.C.Burgess, L.B.Lea, T.J. M.M.Warren, F. W. Edwards, Geo.Fétlds, F.Bs,Elliott, J-A.Brady,W.A. McKnight,T.L.Moore, H. G. .5.Thomas,J.L.Ervin,A.M.Rankin, Fred B. Phifer,andJ.lL. Harris. The following were returned not to befound in Irddell Countys J. W. Martin, No. 132 State VS Herbert C,. Peeler Nos. Loi Stute vs E. L. Bumgarner, Stacy Byers, Boyd Wallace, & Claud Graham. No 129 “tate VS R.R.Ronk No 124 “tate Vs McMillan Jones and James Rhinehardt A So — Ralph Eastep, G.W.Fink, and J. Estes. LARCENCY The defendant comes into open Court, and pleads not guilty of larcency as charged tin the bill of indictment. The Jury after being sworn and empan- nelled returnsa verdict of Not Guilty. STORE BREAKING, LARCENCY AND RECEIVING. The defendants Stacy Byers, Boyd “Wallace, and Claud Grahamcome into open Court md through their counsel,J. G. Lewis and Mike Whitner, and pleads, guklty/ ofystore breaking, larcencyand receiving 4s charged in the bill of indictment. The defendant E. L. Bumgarner comes into open court and throughhhis counsel, H.P.Grier, pleads guilty of receiving which plea 4s accepted by the Solicitor for the State. FORGERY The evidence in this case being heard Tues~ day, May 19, 1925, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be {imprisoned in the common jail of Iredell County for & term of SIX MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period; not to wear stripes, STORE BREAKING The evidence in this case being heard Tuesdays May 19, 1925, it is ordered and adjudged by ae Court thét each of the defendants be imprision in the common jail of Iredell County for & + of FOUR MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Pt lic roads of said county for said period: nov wear stripes, ; ; MAT TERM, 1925, MONDAY MAY 25, 19 2 5. Mrs. William Vs Amerttcan Express Company -- Continued R.F,.Gwaltney vs R.H.Mason -- Continued CO. Statesville Lumber/vs Eugene Holler -- Continued Bessie Houston vs Ivey Houston -- Continued, Alias Summons. B.R.Brady and McIntyre vs Pruitt Hager and Guy Hagsr -- Continued by cofisent. T.D.Shuford vs W.ReHart & Sum ¢ McAuley & Stearns Bros. Inc. -~-continued Vallie Carter vs James Carter -- Continued Marlboro Cotton “ills vs Statesville Cotton Mills Continued by consent F.#.Shinn vs 0.L.Miller, J.A.Fortner, J.L.Rufty, and W.B. Johnson -- Continued Brown Construction Co. vs R.M.Hudson Co. & Mayland Casualty Company -- Continued -- It is ordered by the Court that Stearns Bros. Inc. and Thomas Hardware Co. be allowed to enter plea. D.F.Waller vs Wilborn Yarn Co, +nc. -- Continued by defendant J.W.Beaver vs H.C.Dellinger -- continued L.“EllissHayes, Admr. of M.B.Campbell vs Columbus Campbell et al -- Continued Mrs, Louisa Hayes vs Columbus Campbell et al -- Continued J.H McElwee vs Hutton Bourbonnais Co--Continuec under for- mer order. A.J.Keller *« wife Charlie Hicks & wife -- Continued 1.P,Webster and .J.llatheson vs I,o.S8etzer -- Continued W.SeJohnson et al vs F,H.Shoaf -~- Continued urch & C.8.Grant -- Ui Statesville Lumber Coe, V8 R.L.Cch Continued under for mer order Statesville Lymber Co. vs Eps Continued under former order Harris and Hd Nicholson-- Jas. C. David, Director General of Railway vs Cleveland Rte. G6O.s-* Continued / Jas. C. Davis, Director General of Railway vs Statesville Veneer Co. -- Continued Sttesville Lumber Co. Vs L.W.Westmoreland -- continued under former order Statesville “umber Co. vs N.G.Holmes et al -- continued under former order Statesville Lumber Co. vs Dorsett Fraley et al -- Continued under former order Statesville Lumber Co. VS N.G.Holmes etal -~ Continued under former order Mrs. M B.Yestmoreland vs J.A.“estmoreland -- Continued J.A.Westmoreland Vs Mrs. M, &. Westmoreland -~ Continued Statesville Lumber Co. vs #.G.Holmes -- Continued under former order Hilliard Summers vs Gertrude Summers ~-=- Continued ee Seen mee ee MAY TERM 1925 Monday May 25, 1925 Bank of Stony Point vs D.D.“ittlejohn etal -continuea W.R.Keller vs James ™, Richardson -- Continued J.B.Houpe vs Della Houpe -- Continued R.L.Dickens « Fannie Dickens vs J,P.Nicholson Continued under former order ¥,i.Deaton vs Eugene “orrison et al -- Continued T.S.Patterson vs D.E.Stearns -- Continued C.B.Freeze vs Mrs. John L. Lowe -- Continued Fannie Dickens « Kk, L, Dickens vs N.S.Souther & Pearl Souther -- Continued under former order W.C.Moore vs D.G.'vilson -- Continued by consent Hazel Cline Pierce vs Herman fierce -- Continued Tri-State transportation Co. vs Stearns Bros. tne. ana Globe 4tndemnity Co. -- Continued William Torrence vs J.C.H'rookshire -- Continued In the Superior <t <M ae oe ~ nse coming on to be heard at this term of the annearing to the Court that the plaintiff and he defendant have compromised thier differences, it is there- fore considered, ordered, and adjudged that the plaintiff, Brookshire, recover of the defendant, F. M. Wagner, the the cost of this action to be taxed by the Thos. J. Shaw _ Judge -esiding By consent, WeAsBriatol Atty for Plaintttr D.L.Raymer Atty for defendant No159 North Carolina In the SupertorCourt Iredell County May Term, 1925, T. J. Conger vs JUDGMENT U. I. Roseman MAY TERM 1925 MONDAY May 25, 1925. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, and it appearing to the Court that the parties hereto have compro- mised their @ifferences by consent, it is hereby ordered, considered, and adjudged thatthe plaintiff, T. J.Conger recover of the defendant, U, I, Roseman, the sum of $100.00 with interest thereon from May 18, 1925, together with the cost of this action to be taxedby the Clerk. i Thos. %. Shaw By Consent Judge “residing W.D.Turner Atty for Plaintiff D. 4. Raymer _ Atty for Defendant No 170 North C-rolina In the Sypertor Court M Term 7 Iredell County May Term 1925. D.L, Raymer vs §( { ) Booz-Boyd Construction Co. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and it appearing to the Court that the parties have compromised their pe z to the “gee , » onthe oka eda and adjudged that aifferences by consent, it is rdered, considered, an ; f the plaintiff, D. L, Raymer, recover of the defendant, Booz-Boyd Gonstruction Company, the sum of $125.00 4 It is further ordered and adjudged that each of said parties t C +t cost to be taxed by the is to pay his own cost, and that the Court co Clerk is to be divided equally between the plaintiff and the defen- .& dant. Thos. %. Shaw Judge Presiding By consent Lewis “~ Lewis Rtty for Plaintiff We D.Turner Atty for Defendant This Honorable Court takes 4 recessuntil Tuesday Morning, May 26, 1925, at 9:50 O'clock A.M. SDAY MAY, 26, 1925. | . is TUES » 26, oo. TUESDAY MAY 26, 19 25 This Honorable Court conveaned according to adjurnment Tuesday No. 182 May 26, 1925, at @@30 o'clock A. M. for the dispatch of business, alu aan In the Superior Court Iredell County) May Term 1925 No. 187 cunt ¢ North Carolina, } In the Superior Court ‘ Myrtle Smith vs Tredell County. § May Term, 1925. Robey Smith Cc. V. Henkel and tT, P. Henkel. This cause comingon to be heard at thi " : ua stneuee gz a at this term before His Honor, T. J. Shaw and a Jury, and being heard, and it appearing that the jury H. S. Reeves, ’ ‘ h Huffman * Y.J.Sign answeredthe issues as follows: THE parties to this action having adjudged their dif- "lst: Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the ferences, the plaintiff comes isto Court and takes a non-suit. It is | complaint? Answer, Yes. iwea that the cost be taxed against the plaintiffs. 7 2nd: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of “North Carolina for two vears preceeding the filing of the complaint in this Thos. J. Shaw action? Answer, Yes. Judge Presiding. Srd: Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the com- plaint? Answer, Yes." It is therefore ordered,and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony QO 32 nm +97 arolina, In the Superior Coust, 1925. heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and they are m 4 me County. } May Term, hereby dissolved and thatthe cost be taxed by the Clerk of this Court according to the statute. Ot. Se SON May 26, 1925. J dge Presiding lst Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Yes. 2nd. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two vears preceeding the filing of the complaint in this action? Answer. Yes, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning n. the — May 27, 1925, at 9:50 O'clock A. M. rd. Did the defendant committ adultry as alleged i complaint? Answef, Yes MAY TERMZ 1925 Zire MAY TERM 1 ‘ £ : ‘a . 925 WRPNESDAY MAY 27, 1925. THURSDAY MAY 28 1925. 9 No. 38 This Honorable Court conveaned according to adjurnment q NORTH CAROLINA) In the Superior Court ; ) Wednesday May, 27, 1925, at 10:00 O'clock A, M. for the dispatch of IREDELL COUNTY) May Term, 1925, business. J. L. Ingram The evidence in this case being heard Monday May 25, 1925; it is ordered and adjudged by the Court vs shat the defendant Boyd Wallace be imprisoned in the : common jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR q M.V.Bartles YEARS, and assigned to work on public roads of said county for said period; to wear. stripes. It is fur- ther ordered by the Court that the defendants Stacey Byers and &E. L. Bumgarner each be imprisoned in the This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior ) I ) gm. L. Bumgarner § ) 4 ) common jail of Iredell Cpunty for a term of TWo ( { q 4 4 } 4 Stacey Byers Boyd Wallace Claud Graham YEARS, and assigned to work on public roads of said Court before his Honor, Thos. J, Shaw, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and county for said period; not to werr stripes. His ' ; ’ Honor making a difference between these defendants being heard, and the jury having answered the issues submitted as follows: and Wallace on account’ of them being younger. It is further ordered by the Court that the defendant Claud Graham be imprisoned in the common jail of "1. Did the plaintiff and defendant enter into a contract Tredell County for a term of ONE YEAR, and assigned -to work on public roads of said county for said period; under which the defendant agreed to sell plaintiff gravel and stone as not to wear stripes. alleged in the complaint? 2. If so, did defendant breach his contract as alleged? Answer, Yes. Se What damage, if any is the plaintiff entitled to recover? ‘ENT VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT BY PLAINTIFF?. Answer, $5,000.00." It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- It apprearing to the Court that the plaintiff comes into open throurch his counsel takes a voluntary non-shit, therefore, T 4 £ * 2 2 - * is w+ F id [t is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintif! be from Mayl8, 1925 until paid, together with the cost of this action to non-suited and pay the costs of this action,to be taxed by the Clerk ~ £* f+ oP . . ‘. J = of this Court. be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. ad cover of the defendant the sim of Five Thousand Dollars with interest No. 145 Patsy Cucinally vs JUDGMENT VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT BY PLAINTIFF. D.and L. Lebo,trading ana doing business as, Lebo's Shoe Store. No 163 North Carolina) In the Superior Court It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff comes into open Court through his counsel takes a voluntary non-suit, therefore, Iredell County) May Term 1925 It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited and pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. C.B. Freeze Vs This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday : C.W.Jenkins, et al Morning May 28, 1925, at 10:00 O'clock, A. M. 1. Is the defendant, C.W. Jenkins indebted to the plaintiff, if so in what amount? Answer, Yes, $474.07 and iffterest from August 26, Judge Bres le22. te1.D ey t of 15th Judicial. District. : 2. Is said account barred by the statute of limitations as alleged in the answer? Answer, Yes. No. 163 North Carolina) In the Superior Comme... ae Si Tredeli County) May Term, 1926 May Term 1925, Thursday May 28 1925, No. 163 (Con'td) CG. F. Freeze vs : JUDGMENT c.W.Jenkins & wife Altice Jenkins This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Su- perior Court of Iredell County, and being heard before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, anda jury, and, at the close of plaintiff's evidence, the Court intimated that the plaintiff had not made out a cas: against the defendant, Alice Jenkins, only sub- mitted the issues as against the defendant, C. W. Jenkins, and the jury heaving answered said issues 4s set out in the record finding that the amount due by said defendant, C.W. Jenkins, to the plaintiff was barred vy the statute of limitations: therefore, orderede and adjudged by the Court that the same is hereby non-suited as to the defendant, and it is further ordered and adjudged by the Court recover nothing against the defendant, C.W, Jen- sts of this action be taxed ageinst the plain- this Court. Thos. J. Shaw. duage Presiding. xT NOe 96 North Carolina) In the Superior Court Iredell County) May Term, 1925. W. A.Swnmers Did plaintiff and defendant enter into a contract for the purchase of a saw-mill and engine, as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes, 2, Did the defendant breach the contract as alleged i” the complaint? Answer, Yes, recover? 5. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to Answer, $300.00 MAY TERM 1925, THURSDAY MAY 28, 1925 No. 96 North Carolina) In the Superior Court Iredell County) May Term, 1925, Ww.A. Summers vs T. M. Snow This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court as set out in the record in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, assessing theamount due the plaintiff by the defendant, at $300. It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, W. A. Summers, recover of the defendant, T. M. Snow, the sum of ‘Three Hyndred Dollars, and that the costs of this action be taxed by the Clerk against said defendant. Thos. 5 Judge Presidi No 161 NorthCarolina) Iredell County) J. W. Brown, Vs T. O. Teague This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, Thomas J.Shaw, Judge Presiding, and being heard upoh motion of the defendant to set aside the verdict and judgment heretofore rendered in this case on account of excusableneglect; and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has shown excusable neglect: It is therefore conside~ved, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the verdict and judgment entered in this case at the March Term, 1925, be and the same is hereby set aside and said case is placed upon the calendar for trial at the next term of tre Court. Thos. J.Shaw Juage fresidinge MAY TERM, 1925. THURSDAY MAY, 28, 1925. Yo./9F North Carolina, } 4 May Term, 1925. In the Superior Court, Tredell County. A. B. Johnson and Others, Stockholders, { 4 q vs 0 4 y Southern Show Case Company ‘ To the presiding Judge of the Superior Court, May Term. 1925. John A. Scott, Jr. attorney for the Reveiver, respectfully shows to the Court that Mr. R. T. Weatherman, who was heretofore appoint- 1] Receiver of the Southern Show Case Company, is dead and that it is necessary ea for the Court to appoint a substitute Receiver. Mat Mr. P. P. Dulin, a member of the Statesville Bar, is one of the Administrators upon the estate of the said R. T. Weatherman iis a reputable and competent person suitable to be appointed Ke- Anca ceiver in his stead. John A. Scott, Jr. Attorney for the Neceliver. OR D Ba appearing to the Court that T. Weatherman, Receiver of Souther Show Case Company, is dead, It 1s, thereupon, ordered bycthe Court that P. P. Dulin be, and he is hereby appointed Receiver of the said Southern Show Case Company for the purpose of winding up its affairs and closing its estate and it is further ordered that the said P. P. Dulin, before entering upon the discharge of his duties, shall give a bond in the sum of $500., conditioned upon the faithful performance of his duties as said Kecekver. Thos. J. Shaw Juage Fresiding. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday Morning May 29, 1925, at 10:00 O'clock A. M. Se a “Judge Presfaing an’ ° ourts of 15th Jv@icial District. ee MAY TERM 1925 Friday, May 29th No. 171 North Caroline; In the Supericr Court, Iredell County January ierm 1925 Nib Parker vs ~ J-U-D-G-M-E-N-8 Susan Parker This cause —. on be heard at this term of the Court before his en Moh Lee Judge sresiding, and a Jury; and the jury having answered the issues as follows, to-wit: 1. Did the plaintiff intermarry as alleged in the come plaint? Yes 2. Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apsert for more than five successive years prior tc the commence=- ment of this action, and was said separation without fault of the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer , Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the com- mencement of this action? answer, Yes. It is therefore considered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plain- tiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved. thos. J.shaw Judge +residing KRAEMER ROK OE No. 190 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County May ierm,1925. Louvina Jones $ va 4 Andrew ones é 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, 68 alleged in the complaint. Answer: Yes Sr eae ee = MAY TERM 1925 Friday, May 29th. 2. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for more than five successive years next prior to the com- mencement of action, as alleged in the complaint, and was said sep- aration without fault on the part of plaintiff, 4s alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 23, Has the plaintiff been 4 boni fide resident of the state of North Carolina for more than five successive years next prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. No.190 North Carolina, In the Superior vCcurt, Iredell County. May Term,1925 Louvina Jones vs ‘i JUDGE F Andrew Jones ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Thos. v.shaw, Judge Presiding and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record: It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between tne plaintiff, Louvina Jones, and the defendant, andrew Jvones, be and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. It is further ordered by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. ghos. +.shaw Judge Presiding ERE OR tLe ee SAY (ERM 1925 Friday, May 29th. No. 161 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May ‘erm,1925 C.d.Jonee } ve { ZSSUBS ©.b.Phillips { 1. Is the defendant indebted to plaintiff and if so in what amount? Answer: Yes $400.00 with interest 6% from Aug.25th, 1922 2. is the plaintiff's action barred by the statute cf Limitations? Answer : Yes. No. 181 North Carolina, In the superior Ucurt, Iredell County. before the Clerk. C.d.Jones vs JUDGMENT ©.b.Phillips This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before dis Honor, Thos. v.Shaw, Judge Presiding, and a4 jury, and the jury having answered the issues 4s submitted to them by the court as set out in the record: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that the plaintiff, U J.dones, recover of the defendant, ©.D.Phillips, the sum of sour Hundred Dollars, together with interest thereon from the 25th August,1922, until paid, and that the costs of this action be taxed against the defendant by the Clark of the Court. ‘hos. 7.cshaw Sates Presiding Yhis May 29th,19265. MAY TERM i925 Friday, May 29th. No. 182 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County May term 1925 Clarence Gray i vs ) JUDGMENT Ozelle Gray i Tnis cause coming on to be heard at this Term of Court be- fore His Honor, Thos. J.Shaw, Judge Presiding, and 4@ Jury and being heard, and the Court having submitted to the Jury the following Issues and the Jury having answered said Issues as follows, to-wit: 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry, and sre tney now husband and wife, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer, Yes. 2. Is plaintiff a resident of the Stute cf North Carolina, and has been-a resident of said State for two years immediately pre- ceding tne filing of the Complaint in this action? Answer. Yes. S. Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the Con- plaint? Answer, Yes. It is, therefore, adjudged, ordered and decreed by the Court that the marriuge heretofore celebrated between the plaintiff , Clarence Gray, und tne defendant, Czelle Gray, be and the same is hereby wholly dissolved; and that the said Clarence Gray and the — Gray be and they are hereby wholly and absolutely divorced from each other and from the bonds of matrimony. vhos. «shaw Judge Presiding i ok OK OK 26 RO OR a aR ae No.165 ‘North Caroline, : In the Superior Court, Iredell County, May Term,1925. Brown Construction Com Plaintif?, a ORDER ALLOWING THE THOMAS HaRD- t va ‘ } WARE COMPANY TO INTERVENE i R.M.Hudson Company and Mar yo land Casualty Company, Defendants This cause coming on to be heard before the undersi MAY TERM 1926 Friday,May 29th, Judge presiding at the May Term,1925, of Iredell County Superior Court, upon the affidavit of the Thomes Hardware Company. Upon hearing said affidavit ,it is ordered, considered and adjudged that the Thomas Hardware Company & Stearns Bros., Inc., to intervene in the above entitled action and shall have twenty days from the termination of this Court to file such plead- ings as it may be advised and the defendants shall have twenty days thereafter to file answer or other pleudings. Thos. dJ.shaw Judge Presiding 2K OK ROR ROK 2 7 KOK ROK OK KK No. 117 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term,1925. L.W.Malcolm, Administrator ( of the estute of W.#.Malcolm, | Deceased (Plaintiff) \ vs Mcoresville Cotton Mills, 4 corporation (defendant ) 1. Was plaintiff's intestate's death caused by the neg- ligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint? Answer; Yes 2. Did plaintiff's intestate by his cwn negligence con= tribute to his injury, 48 alleged in the answer? Answer: No S. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover? Answerr:3ix Thousand pollars $6000. 00 MAY TERM 1925 Friday, May 29th. No. 117 L.W.Malcoim, Admr. of W.F. Malcolm vs Mooresville Cotton i Mills ¢ Motion to set aside the verdict as being against the weight cf the evidence. Motion allowed new trial awarded, No.117 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term,1925 LeW.eMalcolm, Administrator of W.#.Mslcolm vs Mooresville Cotton Mills On motion of defendant for leave to amend its answer and set up & compromise and settlement between the plaintiff and the de- fendant, and upon hearing said motion, it is ordered and adjudged b, the Court that the defendant be allowed to amend its answer and that it have thirty days in waich to amend its answer and set up 4n alleged compromise and settlement of the matters of difference be- tween the plaintiff and the defendant growing out of the alleged negligent death of the piaintiff's intestate. Thos. v.shaw Judge Presiding oe ROR ROR ROK RHE MAY TERM 1925 Friday, May 29th No. 154 North Carolina, Superior Court, Iredell County May Term 1925 Sigmon Reinhardt Company,Inc. | vs j J.L.Harris & others j This cause coming on for hearing at this term of the Court, befcre His Honor 1T.J.Shaw Judge, upon motion of the defendants to set aside the judgment heretofore rendered under Sec. 600 of C.S. and by consent of the parties, it is adjudged that the last clause in said judgment be stricken out, and by consent it is ordered that said Commissioner pay to the Creditor cf gaid district, including the judgment cf the plaintiff pro rata as the funds shall come into the Treasury of Iredell County to the Credit of said district. Thos. d.snew Judge rresiding By consent: Jesse C.Sigmon, Atty. for Commissicners W.&.Bristol,atty. for Commissioners EER BKK OR 2 a OK OK aK No 192 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County; May Term, 1925. WM, L. Cowan vs ISSUES D. 0. Cowan MAY TERM 1925, FRIDAY, MAY 29, 1925 L. Did the defendant, D.O. Cowan, rent the land upon which the crops in question were raised to Will Lawrence for the year 1924? Answer, Noe Le What amount, if any, did the said D. 0. Cowan advance to Will Lawrence to make and save said crop during the year 1924? ANSWCPecceceeces 3. How much did the said Will Lawrence repay the defendant out of the said crops for said advancements? Answer....... 4, Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, whatamount? Answer, Yes, $181.97 No. 192 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell ( unty e May ‘Term, 1925 li. LL. Cowan Vs : JUDGMENT D. O. Cowan This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court before His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues sub- mitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiff, as set out in the record: It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff, M. L. Cowan, recover of the defendant, D. 0. Cowan, the sum of One Hundred Eighty-one and 97/100 ($181397) Dollars, and that the costs of this action be taxed by the Clerk of this Court against the defendant. Thos. J. Shaw. Judge Presiding. M.eL.Cowan VS D.O.Cowan : Motion for new trial for errors assigned, overruled. Deferdant excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court. By consent, 60 days al- lowed defendant to make and serve case on appeal, 60 days there- after to plaintiff to serve GetoslM case or exception. Appeal bond fixed at $50.00 MAY TERM 1925, FRIDAY MAY 29, 1925, No 168 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Tredal 1 County: May Term 1925, wW.F.Bowle vs Issues J.A,.Gardner 1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? Answer, Yes, $500.00 No 168 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: May Term 1925, W.. 3 Bowie Vs J. A. Gardner : This cause coming on for hearing at this term of the Superior Court before His Honor, T. J. Shaw, Judge, and a jury, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issuessubmitted to them in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the recora: It is therefore, considered, and adjudged that the plain- tiff, W. F. Bowie, recover of the defendant, J. A. Gardner, the sum of Five Hundred Dollars with interest from May 18, 1925 until paid, and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court against said defendant. Thos. J. Shaw Judge Presiding W.F.Bowie VS J.A.Gardner: Motion by defendant for new trial for errors assigned. Motion overruled. Defendant excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court. Notice of appeal waived. Appeal bond for cost in the sum $75.00 adjudged sufficient. By consent, defendant allowed 60 days in which to serve case on appeal and plaintiff SO days thereafter to serve counter case or exceptions. - MAY TERM? 1925. FRIDAY MAY 29, 1925. No 194 North Carolina: In the Superior Court Tredell County: May Term, 1925. Le. S. Golstein and David Lebovitz, stockholders of the defendant Company, tn behalf of themselves and all other stockholders and creditors who may come in and make themselves plaintiffs vs ee cf ©8 2 68 8 6¢ of «© The Fashion Shop This cause coming on to be heard upon the final report of ass é Turner and W. A. Bristol, receivers of the Fashion Shop, and {t appearing from said report that they have reduced all assets of the Company to cash, aggregating $2,583.59, and that they have paid -eferred claims proven, aggregating $304.78, and that there the pz Ae Q eir hands for general distribution the sum of $2,278.81. their recommendation, it is oonsidered, ordered and * pay out of said funds, first, the cost of ncidental to disbursing the funds; se6- ~ + 2 Ccosv i attorneys, for services to the creditors and $250.00; third, to them for their services the receivers She sum of ‘250,00; receivers the sun of $258. and that the balance be distributed general creditors. the distribution of the funds as herein directed they file an account of their disbursements with * Jourt, and that upon the payment of said funds a am + rdered by the Court,that they be discharged from further as receivers:-of this estate. Thos. Je Shaw. Judge residing This May 25 1925. QQ LAGQOEOGALE CQVOBECGAIAQA North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, t May Term, 1925. Iredell County. 4} G. L. McKnight and M. H. McKnight, Trading as McKnight Auto Co, -VSs- JUDGMENT. John Rice and George Ratledge, Trading as Rice and Ratledzge. O07 This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Iredell] Superior a ya pou) 4 Court before his Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and it appear- ing to the Court that the parties of the said action have compromised and settled their differences,as set forth in the Pleadings in said cause, and it further appearing to the Court by virtue of said compro- mise and settlement that the defendnat herein is due to the plaintiff the sum of Twenty Seven Dollars and ninty six cents ($27.96). Now, therefore, it is ordered,vadjudged and decreed by the Coubt that the plaintiff recover of the defendnat the sum of $27.96 and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, Zeb. V. Turlington Attorney for plaintiff Zeb. V. Long & PP. 8S. Carlton Attorneys for defendant. Thos J. Shaw Judge Presiding. QALY LA COQ MA TERM, 1925 e Friday May 29, 1925. Wey 189 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1925. Fielden M. Privette vs John M. Privette. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T. J, Shaw, Judge Presiding, on motion of the defendant to set aside the tudement in the above santitled action, which motion was heard bf the Clerk of the Court and motion overruled by him, from which motion the defendant appealed to the Superior Court in term, and after hear- tne the affidavit upon which said motion was made, and argument of counsel for plaintif and defendant, it is considered, erdered and adjudged that the judgment of J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court, fusing to allow the defendant to defend, 2a Fy oe and the same is hereby overruled, It is further considered, ordered and adjudged that the is hereby allowed to defend said action as pro- 492 of the Consolidated Statutes of ‘orth Carolina. within which to file answer. Thos. J. Shaw Juage Presidings North Varolina, - ne a Iredell County. | n the Buperior Court. W. W. Rankin Co. vs S. L. Overcash This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N.C. and being heard and it appearing that the complaint dulf verefied was filed in the office of the Clerk Superior Yourt of Iredell County, N.C. on the 15th day of April, 1925 and a summons was issued on said day, that the sum- mons and a copy of the complaint were served on the defendant S. L. Overcash more than twenty days prior to this date, that the demand in the complaint is for amonnts due on oven account on a note, that no answer has been filed. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant S. L. Overcash the sum of SIX hundred eighty two and 52/100 Dollars with interest thereon from April 15, 1925 at the rate of six per cent per annum and that the cost of this action be taxed against S. L. Overcash. This Monday May 11, 1925. A + J. A. Hartness ec ee ee Clerk Superior Court. North Carolina, }§ In the Superior Court. Iredell County. | We W. Rankin Company, vs Bruce Overcash and Odell Overcash This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County, N. C. and being heard and it appearing that the complaint was duly verified and filed in this office on the 15th day of April, 1925 and that the summons in oe cause is- sued from 2aid office on the said day and it further ‘eppearing that the demand made in the comp laint was for a sum of money aue.On m1 ory note and that the summons and the copy of the complaint were serveda on the defendants more than twenty days prior to thia date and that no answer has been filed. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendants the sum of $463,135 with interest from April 15, 1925 until paid at the rate of six per cenf per annum and that thexcost be taxed against the defendants. This Monday May, 11, 1925. Jas. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. Q2COAXGRAQEBEO CACAZOBQ OCQQQQO2CPOCQECQQALE nr wh e . 11 4 \¢ rth Carolina, j { In’ the Superior Court. 4 Iredell County. JUDGMENT. mpany § This cause coming on tonbe hemrd and being heard before the Supertor Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the plaintiff and defendant have compromised and settled their 4ifferences by the defendant agreeing to pay the plaintiff a certain sum of money, it further appearing to the Court that the defendant has paid the plaintiff said amonnt of money: It is therefore,ordered and dajudged by the Court that this cause be dismissed,and that the defendant pay the costs of theaction, except witnesses which are to paid by the paPtyotn whose behalf they were subpeoned,. This the lst day of June, 1925. J. A. Hartness —<—s Clerk Superfor Court ireae ouly. ’ Consent Judgment: Lewis & Lewis Attorneys for Plaintiff. Haves & Jones and Greer & Grier Attorneys for Defendants. North Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court J.W.Redman,M.E.Redman,trustee,Chas : C.Tharpe and A.J.d4nderson and Bristol Tharpe, trustee and W.4.Bristol Jf and T.N.Brown end D.L.Brown,trading as 7.N.Brown & Son, Plaintiffs va } REPORT OF COMMISSIONER Jeane Sowers or M.J.Sowers. j To the Hon. J.A.Hartness,C.S.C. Tre undersigned P.P.Dulin, Com. in obedience to an order made by the Court in this cause on the 6th day of April 1925 after due advertisement as required by law and as directed in the judgment of the Court, sold the land belonging to the defendant us described and set forth in the complaint of the pluintiffs at the Court House Door in the city of statesville at 12 o'clock Noon on the 9 day of May, 19265 the following described tract; Lying and being in Cool Springs Township, Iredell Ccunty, adjoining the lands of Jno. Hall, Ea Lazenby, voc McGuffy and others and beginning at @ hedge on Fifth Creek running down Fifth Creek 54 poles to @ willow stake; thence N. 2 E. 66 poles to a stone; thence 5.20 poles to a stone; thence N. 200 poles to a stake on the public road; thence with the road W. 78 poles to a post oak Holland's corner; thence 5. ll E. 126 poles to a stone;thence 3. 6&7 W. 54 poles to a red oak;thence S. 37 poles to an oak, now down; thence s. 38 W. & poles to a stone; thence S. 44 W. 36 poles to & pine, now dead; thence 8. 30 KE. 44 poles to the beginning corner, containing 1194 acres,more or less and known as the Tuck Yract allotted to M.J.sowers in the division of the lands of her father the late W.C.Sowers, was purchased by W.A.Bristol at the price of $4600.00. More than twenty days having elapsed since said sale and no increased bid having been placed ontnis tract and it being the judgment of your commissioner that the price received is a fair and reasonable privge and mach as the land would bring at any other public gr private sele, said undersigned commissioner respectfully asks that the sale éenis trast to the said W.a.Bristol be —_— firmed and that eaid Commissioner be authorized to execute deliver to aid W.a.Brietol 8 — eee seid lend. | : ner fur opin Vict ‘at sete wee, tne : Iying and being in Bethany township, Iredell County,ad joining the lands of Bert Crawf ord,Vickery, uno.Sowers,A.L.Fox,now owned by Black- welder and beginning at @ stone on the N. bank of 5th creek,running with Raymer's formerly Hayes line, S.13 W. 22 poles to an oak;thence S., 9 W. 46 poles to a B.C.: thence 5S. 4 degrees W. 38 poles to an ash; thence S. 15 s. 5& poles to a stone,Vickery‘s corner;thence 3, 874 W. 57 poles to & W.0. or stone; thence S. 12 W. 24vpoles to a stake on the creek; thence down the creek to the beginning, containing 24 acres, more or less and being the E. side of that tract allotted to Jane Sowers in the division of the lands of her mother, was purchased by W.B.Crawford for the sum of $750.00. As more than twenty days have elapsed since said sale am no in- creased bid has been put thereon end as it is the opinion of the un- dersigned Commissioner that the price bid for this tract of lend is a fair and adequate price and as much as it would bring st any other public or private sale, the undersigned commissioner recommends that the bid for this tract of land be confirmed by the court and thet he be directed tc execute and deliver to the purchaser a deed covering this tract of land. vne undersigned further shows to the vourt that at said sale the following described two tracts of land, to-wit: First: Lying end being in sbethany township, lredell county ,ad- joining the lands of #.L.Sharpe, Mrs. Nicholson, John Sowers and others and beginning at a pine Sharpe's ccrner running: thence 38.&& E. 217 poles to & stone;thence N. B. 219% poles to a stone Vick- ery's corner and the corner of the ono. Sowers tract; thence s. 76 4. 102 poles to & stone; thence S. 9 poles tc a small pine N. 66 W. 52 poles to & hickory in Hayes line; thence 3. 28. to the beginning, corner, containing 124 acres,more or less, and being the 8S. end of the #.C.Sowers home-stead allotted to M.J.Sowers in the division of the lands of her fatner. second iract: Lying in Bethany township, Iredell County, adjoin- ing the 124 acre tract above described bound on the N. by the lands of Mat Houpe on the &. by the lands of Will Davis; on the Ss. by the lands of vr. &.M&.eYount; on the W. by the lands of John Sowers and above mentioned 124 acre tract and containing 45 acres, more or less and being the lands allotted tc m,J.Sowers in the division of the lands of her mother S.h.Sowers were purchased by W.A.Bristol at tne price of $50.00 an acre. Your commissioner respectfully reports to the Court that in his opinion the price of $50.00 an acre for the last two mentioned and above described tracts of land is inadequate and not a sufficient price; that it is the opinion of ycur commission that if the resale cf these two tracts of land be had that a better price may be ob- tained and that ycur commissioner respectfully asks the Court that a re-sale of land be made after giving thirty days advertisement as required by law and that said sale for these last two tracts be not confirmed. + ek erent submitted. whis Wedensday, the 3rd, day of June 25. P.P.Dulin COMMISSIONER NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL COUNTY J.W.Redman,M.£.Redman,trustee, Chas. C.Tnarpe and a.J.anderson and Bristol TharpegTrustee ,and W.A.Bristol, and T.N.Brown and DECREE PTR) 5 D.L.Brown trading as 1.N. Brown ne and son,plaintiffs TWO TRACTS OCF LAND IN THE vs ENTITLED CAUSE AND Jane Sowers or u.J.Sowers CRDERING A RE-SALE CF TWO TRACTS This cause again coming on to be heard before the wmder- signed J,A.Hartness,C.5.C. Iredell County ani it appearing to the Court from the report of Commissioner that pursuant to an order of the Court heretofore made that the lands of the defendant as described in the petition were exposed to public sale after due advertisement as required by law, on the 9 day of May,1925 and it furtner appesring to the Ccurt that W.a.Bristol purchased a tract of land consisting of 119 acres known as the Yuck trect and des- cribed &s follows: Adjoining tne lands of vonn Hall, Hd. Lazenby,Dock Mc- Guffy and others and beginning at a hedge on # ifth Creek running down rifth Creek 54 poles to a willow stake;thnence N. 2 &. 66 poles to & stone;thence S. 20 poles to a stone; thence N. 200 poles to @ stake on the public roud; thence with the rosd W. 76 poles to a post oak Holland's corner; thence S. 11 E. 126 poles to a stone; thence S. 87 W. 54 poles to a red oax;thence 5. 37 poles to an oak, now down; thence 8. 36 W. & poles to a stone;thence S. 44 W. 36 poles to & pine, now dead; thence Ss. 30 &. 44 poles to the be- ginning corner, containing 119% acres,more or less, at tne price cf $4600.00 and it appesring to the Ccurt from the report of Com- missioner that more than twenty days elapsed and no increased bid was made on this tract and that the price bid for same was a fair and adequete price and that in the opinion of the Commissioner the sale of this tract of land should be confirmed. It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that the sale of the above described tract of land to W.aBristol,be and the same is hereby ratified and affirmed and the said P.P. Dulin, Commissioner is hereby authorized empowered and directed to execute and deliver to said W.A.Bristol a deed conveying said tract of land. and it further appearing to the Court thet at said sale W.B.Crawford purchased at the price of $750.00 that tract of land bound and described as follows: Lying and being in Bethany Township, Iredell County, adjoining the lands of Bert Crawford, Vickery, John Sowers,a.L. Fox, now owned by Blackwelder and beginning st @ stone on the N. bank of 5th creek, running with Raymer's formerly Hayes line S. 13 W. 22 poles to an oak;thence &. 9 4. 48 poles to a B.0.; thence S. 4 degrees W. 36 poles to an ash;thence S. 15 E. 52 poles 7k W. 37 poles to a W.0 to a stone, Vickery's corner;thence 5S. 8 cr stone; thence S. 12 W. 24 poles to 4 stake on the creek; thence down the creek to the beginning, containing 24 acres,more or less and being the &. side of the tract allotted to Jane Sowers in the division of the lands of her mother. Court from report of said com- Missioner that the ice of $750.00 bid for said land is a fair and adequate price sod that increased bid has been put on said sale for said tract and it further appearing to the Court from . the report of said Commissioner that price was in the opinion o said commissioner a fair and adequate price and that said bid And it appearing to the should be confirmed, it is therefore ordered and decreed tnat said gale be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified and affirmed and the said P.P.Dulin, Commissioner is hereby empowered and directed to deliver to the said W.B.Crawford a deed conveying said land, And it further appearing to the Court from report of said Com- missioner the following two tracts of land, to-wit: First: Lying and being in Bethany Township, Iredell County ,adjoin- ing the lands of #.L.Sharpe,Mrs. Nicholson, John Sowers and others and beginning at a pine Sharpe's corner runiing; thence 8S. 869 E. 217 poles to a stone;thence N. e. 217 poles to a stone Vickery's corner and the corner of the Jno. sowers tract; taence 8S. 78 W. 102 poles toa stone; thence S. 9 poles to @ small pine N. 88 W. 52 poles to a hick- ory in dayes line;thence 5. 2W. to the beginning, corner, contain- ing 124 acres,more or less and being the S. end of the W-C.Sowers home-stead tract alloited to hie deSOWers in the division of the lands of her father. Second: lying in Bethany township, Iredell County,adjoining the 124-acre tract abcve described bound on the N. by the lands of Mat Houpe on the s. by the lands of Will Davis; on the S. by the lands of pr. &.iM.eYount, on the W. by the lands of Jno. Sowers and above mentioned 124 acre tract and containing 43 acres,more or less and be- ing the lands allotted to m.J.Sowers in the division of the lands of her mother S.k.Sowers, were purchased by W.A.Bristol at the price of $50.00 and acre and it further appearing to the Court from the report of the said commissioner that the price of 950.00 bid for these two tracts of land was not a fair and adequate price and not all that said lands were worth and that in the opinion of said Com- missioner said bid should not be confirmed and that a re-sale of these two tracts should be had, it is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court thet the sale of these two tracts at $50.00 an acre be rejected and it is further crdered that a re-sale of these two tracts be be made after due advertisement as required by law. It ig hereby specifically ordered and adjudged that the sale of the 1194 acre tract known as the ‘tuck tract as above described, to W.A.Bristol at tne price of $4600.00 and the sale of the 24 acre tract as above described at the price of ¥750.00 be ratified and in all respects confirmed and the said commissioner is hereby directed to execute and deliver to each of said purchasers & deed covering the respected tract purchased by them. “hig the 3 day of vune,19265. ___d.4.Hartness Clerk of superior Court North Carolina, Iredell County In the Superior Court ¥F.L.Early,trading and doing f business under the firm nme of Elmwood Lumber Co, j : } vs W.F.Bridges and 4A.N.Bridges This cause coming on tobe neard and beingheard before he undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell Ccunty on Monday the 15 of Jume,1925 and it appearing to the Court that summons was is- sued against said defendants in this action on the 5 day of May, 1925 and wés duly served upon tne defendants in said cause by per- sonal service and by leaving & copy of said summons with said de- fendants and each of them md by leaving a duly verified copy of the complaint with each of said defendants and that « verified com- plaint was filed in said cuase, on Wey 5,1925: And it further appearing to tne Court that the said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of 3419.94 with interest thereon from Dec.2,1924 until paid; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants have failed to file an answer or demurer to the complaint within the time required by law: NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendants in the sum of $419.94 (Four hundred and nineteen dollars and 94/100) together with the interest thereon ut the rate of 6% from date until paid and further that the plaintiff recover the cost in the action. Whigs the 15 day of June,1925 J.4.Hartness Clerk of superior Court of iredell County Tek RR RR RR aR ORR a RE EERE EEB EEE EE EEE EEE 4 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk, §.d.Holland and J.B.Cooper, trading ami doing business as Motor S&éles Company vs JUDGMENT Ie~L.Wagner This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was served by per- sonal service, and that the complaint has been filed more than twenty days, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the retuwn date set forth in said summons, and that the complaint was duly ver- ified and filed before the suid return date, and that tnis is 4 suit on note, being for a fixed certain amount, said amount being the sum of 9185.02 together with interest thereon from the 27th, day ao July 1924 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that te defendunt has failed and neglected to file m answer or demur to the complaint as provided by law: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant tne sum of $265.08 tovetner with interest thereon from the 27th, day of Jduly,1924 until peid,and that the costs of this action be taxed against said defendant by tne Clerk of this Court. This the 15th day of June,1925. JA -Hartness Clerk superior ccurt of Iredell County oe COCCECESCESE LE COGEC CEE CEEECaE North Carolina, In the Superior Comrt, Iredell County. Thomas O'*Berry { vs ) JUDGMENT F.L.Castex, dr. f This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Ccunty on the Zrd Monday in June, 1925, being the 15th day cf June 1625 andit appearing to the court thet this action was instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant upon 4 sealed note for the sum of y336 with interest from Jeanusery 1st,1915 and it further appearing that summons in this action and a verified complueint were duly served upon the defendant upon the 2lst day of May,1925 and that no mswer nor demurrer has been filed by tne defendant within the time allowed by law and it further appesring that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the defendant upon tne verified compladint,hew in filed. It is now ordered and edjudged that the plaintiff, Thomas O'Berry, recover of tne defendant, *.L.Castex,dr., tne sum of Ynree Hundred and thirty six dollars with interest from January 1lst,1915, at the rate of 6% per annum, and all cost of the action. J.4 Hartness Clerk superior Court eR ROR OR she ee a OR a a le ae In the Superior Court, Columbia, and being bounded on the North by the Wil C t q ses County line; Sos age Before the Clerk. on the Kast by the lands of Walden woore and John koe 1 iM —id ¢ 1 éeore; on the South by the lands of Dalton Williams; and on the West by the lands 2 Wes y th } } I 5 nk of Columbia, The Federal Lana Ba i of K.D.Speaks and Kemp, and being the land conveyed to &.L.Dickens Plaintiff by L.C.Myers and others by deed dated August 11tn,1909, and re- j we DECREE CF FCRECLOSURE a ) 5 I x ig r z.L.Dickens and wife Vertie vickens eeeren te See ere ace OF Che Hegister of Leeds of Ireiell County, in ) Jie ‘ n S tesville 5 and #annie Dickens,and The Statesvi 1 Book 46, page 569, and by deed cf Dorman nompson, Commissioner ; ° National Farm Loan association, seaeeserts which is also cf record in the office of tne Kegister of veedsof Iredell County. l. Tais cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned And the defendants k.L.vickens and wif icl Clerk cf the Superior Ccurt of Iredell County, on this the 15th day - . and wife vertie vickens and Fannie vickens and the statesville National 2 ° ; , er farm s - of June,1925, and it appearing to the Court that summons was duly u & Loan associ ation, having filed no answer in séia action, and time fo iswe issued nerein on the l6th day of May, 1925, that duly verified com- » & ne for answer ing naving expired: plsint was filed herein,and that summons, together with copy of the ao If IS BOW, a motion cf J.a.Stewart ttorney for Pl a z < espe ~ a 44 J ; < ainti compluint, were duly served upon the defendants on the 18th day of f ae ’ * Crdered, Adjudged and agreed that Plaintiff huve ond reccv fr ‘ < e ia La Vad lta 5 all rec er Oo] Mey, 1925 and it further appearing to the Court from the complaint 7 F ae the defendants k.L.Dickens wd wife Vertie Vickxens anc Fannie Dick- thet the defendant borrower on the llth day of September,1922,exe- ens and the statesville National verm Loan association, the sum cuted to plaintiff and amortization nae in the principal sum of two ; of two thousand one hundred md four dollars and forty seven cmts thousand dollars (¥2000.00) and that two thousand dollars and sixty ($2104.47) with interest thereon from the lotn aay of June,19265, two cents (¥2000.62) of said principal is unpeid, besides interest in ‘ at the rate of six per cent (6%) per snnum. the amount of one hundred and three dollars and eighty-five cents 5. It is further ordered and decreed that J.W.Sharpe,be, ($103.85) thereon. Reis and is hereby appointed as Commissioner of this Court, aa as such 2. and it further appearing to the Court that ‘ihe statesvillé is @irected to advertise for sele und sell on the 16th day of Nutionel «arm Loan Association duly endorsed said note for the plain- July,1925, lands described in suid mortgage. tiff and that it hus neglected to pay the same, although demand nes said Commissioner shell require the successful bidder to make @ been made upon it; a te deposit of not less than cre hum red fifty dollers ($150.00) either 3, and it further appearing to the Vourt that said indebt- ; ee by cash or certified check, with the ssid Commissioner, os evidence edness is secured by a mortzuge to tne wederal Land Bank of Columbis, tg : of gcod faith in the diddire, the sume to be applied on nis bid which is record in the 6ffice of the xegister of Deeds of Iredell : in . , : should ne comply herewith, but should he fai 1 to do so then it County in Bcok 56, page 93 and ecvers the following described land : ad : shall be forfeited to the plaintiff and tne premises re-sold on to wit: the same or next convenient seles day thereafter upon tne same All tha j ntainin t certain piece;parcel or tract of land co & ate destin ee terms and at his risk, the said sale to be 145 acres,more or less, situate ne and being about twenty miles : »lying 7 hours cf sale and upon the following terms: cash on confirmation Iredell northeast of the cit of Sst Vil I yownshi j 6] th ea y tatesvii le, in New Hope i Ps of 381 P ( t of the pm oceeds derived from s& ads e e Commis County, State of North Carol vi e metes ’ i + r of ne ina, he ing such shap ° , course 3 11 ~ t and expenses here ‘ togetn r wi th all and distances as will more f 1@ to & plat there~ ully appear by referenc P such taxes, including drainage texes, 68 may have deen assessed cf made by S.4.Goforth, surveyor, on august the 16th, 1922 and at- e due therem. He shall against said land and which may now b tached to the abstract now on file with the Federal Land Bank of then pay the remainder to the Mederal Land Bank of Columbia to @ ply on the indebtedness heretofore adjudged in his favor, and if said amount is in excess of the amount due to the #ederal Land Bank of Columbia, the surplus snall be paid in the Court to awé&it the fur- ther order thereof, The Federal sand Bank of Columbia pay at said sale bid on said property and in cuse itis @ successful bidder the amount of its bid snall be applied as a credit upon the indebtedness owing to it, and the Commissioner will report his séle to the umer- signed Clerk for further orders. 6. that all right, title, interest and equity of redemption of the defendants k.L.Dickens and wife Vertie vickens and #annie Dickens and the statesville National #urm Loan association 4s well &gs all other persons whomsoever claiming thrcugh or under them, in and to the premises or any wrt thereof herein order to bestcw,be and the same ure nereby forever burred and forclosed. 7 - It is further CRDERED, aDJUDUZD and VYECREED that the plaintiff have and recover of tne defendant the sum of ten dollars and thirty cents ($10.30) as cost of this action. J.4.Hartness Clerk of the Superior Cowt the 15th day of June,1925. PKEEEREK ERK KER EE 2 RK a OK OO th Carol | Nor olina, ' In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk, Carolina Motor Co. vs JUDGMENT, H. C. Hunter This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina on Monday the 27th day of July 1925, and it appearing to the Court that summons was duly issued in this action on the 9th day of March, 1925, and served on the defendant by personal service on the 14th day of March 1925, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint on the 2lst day of March 1925, and that the said defendant is indebted to the plain- tiff in the sum of $340.35 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 9th day of March 1925, until paid and same is due by account, being a certain stated amount, and the said defendant has failed to answer or demur to said complaint within the time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plain- tiff recover of the defendant the sum of %340.35 together with interest thereon et “he rate of six per cent per annum from the 9th day of March 1925, until paid, and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this‘@ourt. This the 27th day of July, 1925. J. A. Hartness @ierk Superior court Iredell Younty. Q@QWEOUBIXOGIGAUAOSL @QQOQAAIGAQIASS North Carolina, 4} In the Superior Gourt, t Iredell Sounty. } Before the Clerk. , Lee C. Brown,trading and doing busi- ness as Iredell 011 Company. ( vs ' 4 JUDGMENT. : ' H. C. Hunter and being heard pefore the rth Car6- This cause coming on to be heard he Superior Court of Iredell County No 1925, and it appearing to the undersigned Clerk of t lina, on Monday the 2%th day of July, Court that summons was issued in this action on the llth day of June, 1925, and served on the defendant by personal service on the 12th day of June 1925, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified compaaint on the 25th day of June 1925, and that the said defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $399.87 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the lst day of January 1925, until paid, and same is due by account, being a certain stat@diamount, and the said defendant has faited to answer or demur to said complaint within the time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recpver of the defendant the sum of $399.87 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the lst day of January, 1925, until paid, and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 27th dag of July, 1925. J. .A-e Hartness Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County. @@QWSIE -YYYBQAIBBOIBY SYYBBIOAOOOGIE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, AUGUSTNYERM, 1925, MONDAY’ AUGUST 3,21925, NORTH CAROLINA:: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY: : AUGUST TERM 1925, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolina, at the Court house in Statesville, N.C., on the 5th Monday before the 1st Monday in Sept- ember, 1925, the same being the Srd day of August, AS2D. 1925, when and where His Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding and holding courts for * the 15th Judicial District, Fall Term, 1925, is present and presiding, and Hon. Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor, is present,and prosecuting in the name of the state. M,. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, is pre- sent and returned into open court the names of the following goodand lawful men to serve as jurors for thefirst week of this term of the Super@or Court, to-wit: The following were drawn and sworn as Grand Jurors for the: term: Sam Joyner, A.W.Johnson, J.H.Shuford, G,.T.Web- er, J.W.Fowler, J.D.Patterson, C.H.Knox, J,R.eBrawley, W.R.Mills, T. 8S. Stakkleather, C. B. Drum, J. G. Morris, P.V.Dotson, W. W. Mayhew, Charles Stewart, J. C. LewWstn, R. S. Lipe, and J. E. Webb. C. H. Knox was appointed and sworn as foreman of the Grand 0.B.Lazenby was appointed as officer of the Grand Jury. George F. Mayhew was returned "Not to be found", in Ire- dell County. 8.G.Caudill was excused for a lawful cause. (Minister) The following were drawn and sworn as petty jurors for the terms 8.H.Houston, J,A.Reavis, K.F.Gaither, E.E.Robertson, J,Ce R.L-Shoemaker, W.A.Sloop, Brookshire, J.A.Tatum, H.D.Fry, H.A.Steele, & J.F.Forcum, L.W.Litten, H.S.Gross, C.”. Sides, A.L.Collins,/J.L.Lewis, No 53 PALSE PRETENSE State Continued under former orders vs R.OiKyles No 60 GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS State Continued under former order. vs R.O.Kyles No 72 State vs 0.G.Sills, LeAeBoggs, & J.0.Gaither. No 79 State ys Robert Williams & Boss Reid No 84 State vs John G. McGhamery No 106 State vs Robert Ruff No 111 State VS Howerd Johnson Type No 1135 State vs Gladys Phifer No 137 State ye John Sipes, Arthur Fox, Ravmond Fox, and Arthur Bun che No 133 State vs Tom Simmons Flake Jenkins Sora sooo es oom I A I DM AED Oe a t Term, 1925, M y, August 3, 1925. MANSLAUGHTER Noi Prossed with leave TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR The defendant, Boss Reid, appeared and showed good behavior. Continued to January, Term, 1926. Defendant, Robert Williams, Alias Capias, ABANDONMENT Nol Prosed with leave. TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR Defendant appeared and showed good behavkor.e. Continued under former order. TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR Alias Capias. FORGERY Continued under former order. FORCIBLE TRESPASS Tne defendants by their counsel, W.De Turner, waived bill and plead guilty as upon bg11 found of forcible trespass. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendants each phy a fine of $100 and the cost, and give bond in the sum of $200 each fortheir appearance at the January and August Terms of the Superior Court for 3 years to show good behavior. HOUSE BREAKING Not a true bill. and OPERATING WITHOUT LIGHTS. Court and automobile on ts as charged v in the b#il of 4ndictmente This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, August 4, 1925, at 9:30 O'clock, A.M. AUGUST TERM, 1925 TUESDAY, AUGUST &, 1925, Noe This Honorable Court conveanes according to adjournment Tue a= day Morning, Augusty4, 1925, at 9:50 oclock A.M. for the dispatch of business. No. 136 State vs Flake Jenkins No, 135 State vs Burley Warren Arthur Fox Roas Fox No a 135-A State vs Arthur Fox, & Ross Fox No 138 State Va Rayfiond Goodman 4 : 4 . ) t 6 $ § 4 ‘ ' § t $ ee WEAPON, a verdic and cost 6 this Court, give bond thefdefendart era Auto- s for a AFFRAY The defendantg come into open court and thr ough their counsels H.P.Grier, J. H. Burke,and J. G. Lewis and plead guilty of an affray as charged in 7 Bill of Indictment. h t 1s ordered and adjudged bythe Court that eae fthe defendants pay a fine of $300.00 and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. VIOLATION OF THE STATE PROHIBITION LAWS The defendant Arthur Fox comes into open Court and through his counsels J. H. Burke, and J. G. Lewis pleads guilty of receiving liquor fr beverage purposes. This case and case number 13 5 above is combined for judgment as to the defendant, Arthur Fox. Continued as to Ross Fox. FALSE PRETENSE The defendant comes into open Court and pleads Not Guilty. Jury No 1 after being duly sworn and empannelled for theipeyerdict say they find the defendant guilty of False Pretense as charged 4n the Bill of Indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisioned in the comman jail of Iredell County for apterm of Four MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said County for said period. The defendant to werr felon stripes. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, August Sth, 1925, at 9:30 @'clock A.M. 0. our District of N.Ce AUGUST TERM, 1925 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1925, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, at 9:30 O'clock, A. M.on the 5th day of August, 1925, for the dispatch of business. oy porcaaBLE TRESPASS . No. 140 ) The defendant comes into open Court and through —— his counsel Buren Jurney pleads guilty of forceable “i sini trespass 4s charged in the bill of indictment. Baas BUS It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defenflant be sent to the Morriron Training School of Richmond County, North Carolina for a term of FIVE YEARS. 125 EMBEZZLEMENT. No. Continued by consent. State vs Dewey L. Foil No. 134 ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. State The defendnat comes into open Court and through vs his counsel Buren Jurney pleads guilty of assult Buck Faulkner with deadly weapon as charged in the warrant. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court thet prayed for judgment be continued until next Term of the Superior Court. No. 136 ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. State It is ordered by the Court that the first sen- vs tence imposed upom the defendant be stricken out Flake Jenkins andvtHat he pay the costs of this action and pay 495 @n the Hospital bill of Marion Alexander who was injured and $25 to Rod Dalton for damages to Automobile. AUGUST TERM, 1925, WEDNESDAY AUGUST, 5, 1925, a9 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. }¢ August Tern, 1096 TO HON. HENRY P. LANE, JUDGE PRESIDING. We, the Grand Jury for thés the August Term 1925, of Iredell Superior Court, beg to respectfully report to the Court our findings as follows, topwit: FIRST. We have visited and carefully inspected each and all of the offices. So far as we are able to ascertain the records in said-sounty officers are neatly and properly kept with all businesspromptly and ef- ficiantly transacted. SECOND. We recommed that the County Commissioners provide at once a convenient place about the Court house, a toilet upon which that shall be place a locking device and a slot arrangement by which all those who may desire to use said place can by droping in a nickle have said privilege. THIRD. We visited the county fail house and find same kept in good and first class condition. We find now confined therein, four white maleg; one white femsle; four colored male prisoners. The prisoners all express entire satisfaction and approval of the care and keep afforded to them. FOURTH. We find at the County home, seventeen white females; eleven white males; six colored females; eight colored males; making a total of forty-two inmates. These inmates are in good condition and well cared foxy. We al&’o find crops in fairly good condition. We also find three mules; twelve head of milkl} cows; also two cows not giving milk. We aiso find about thirty head of hogs in fine condition. Mr. Perry has already turned over to the county commissioners something over $400.00. Made about six hundred bushels of wheat on farm this year. There is something over eight thousand pounds of flour that has not been taken up yet of last yeas crop, 1924, FIFTH. We visited the county chain gang in a committee of five, and find everything in good condition. We find twelve white prisonsrs and nine colored prisoners. Other things seem to be well kept. We find twelve heat of mules, also the regular road equipment in good condition. We are, Respectfully, AUGUST TERM, 1925, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1925. No. 125 @arolina Iron Works, Ince ( JUDGMENT. E.L. Flewers trading as E. L. Flowers Supply CO6 ' : . vs 4 : 4 This cause coming on tocbe heard at this term before His Honor Judge Henry P. Lane and being heard and it appearing that the matters in controversey between the parties to this action have been settled. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaihtiff take nothing under its claim. It is fubther ordered and adjudged that the defendnat take nothing under his counter claim. It is furfher ordered and adjudged that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaitiff by the Clerk of this Court. Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding Zeb V. Turlington Attorney for plaintiff A. A. Whitner Attorney for defendant. North Carolina, § In the Superior Court Iredell County. 4 August Term, 1925. Merchants and Farmers Bank, §( Mooresville, N. 6. q 4 vs 4 RE- REFERENCE ‘ D.A.Beam & wife, L.A.Beam. } This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, and being heard and it appearing to the Court, that the referee failed to ace company his report,with a statement of an account between the plaintiff rt and the defendant, and that he did not transcribe and accompany said repo with the evidence taken before him as required by law. It is therefore considred, ordered, and adjudged that the cause te and the same is hereby re-fered to D. L. Raymer the referee with instruc e- fons to accompany his report with the evidence in the cause and as stat AUGUST TERM, 1925 THURSDAY, AUGUST 6, 1925, ment of an account between the parties hereto, and if necessary t y to rehear the evidence for this purpose and reporthis ection to the next ferm of this Yourt. Henry P, Lane Judge Presiding. Mrs William Wallace vs American Express Company -~ Continued Mrs. M. E. Westmoreland ve J. A. Westmoreland -- Continued J. A. Westmoreland vs Mrs M. E. Westmoreland -- Continued R. F. Gwaltney vs R. H. Mason. -- Conbtinued. Vallie Carter vs Sames Varter - -- Continued Statesville Lumber Co. vs J. T. Chappell and Alice Chappell -- Continued ; W. L. Lockman,Jr. and his next fried W. L. Lockman Sr. vs Eugene Tate. -- Continued T. Ross Alexander,Inc. vs John L. Shultz and Son,Inc. -~ Contiuned. Cleveland Feed Co., vs John L. Shultz and Son,Inc. -- Continued L. Ellis:Hayes, NWdmr. of M.L.Campbell vs Columbus Campbell Continued by consent. Mra Louisa Hayes vs Columbus Campbell et al. -~ Continued by conser J. He. McElwee vs Hutton & Bourbonnais Co -- Continued under formed order A. J. Keller and wife vs Charlie Hicks and wife -- Continued under formed order. W. T. Webster & W. J. Matheson vs J.S. Setzer - - Countiuned, W. 8. Johnson et al vs F. H. Shoaf. Continued Statesville Lumber Co. vs RK. L. Church & C.S. Grant -- Continued Statesville Lumber Co. vs Epps Harris « Edd Nicholson-- Confinued Jas.C. Davis, Director General of Kailway vs Cleveland Mfg. Co. Conti nued Jas.C. Davis Birector General of Railway va Statesville Veneer CO. Continued. W. C. Wooten et al vs Iredell Farmers Union Warehouse Co. Continued under former order. L. B. Hollar vs Jeease MILier -~ Continued Statesville Lumber Co. vs L. W. Westmoreland -- Gontinued under former ofder. Statesville Lumber Co. vs N. G. Holmes et al -~- Continued tinder former order. Statesville Lumber Co. vs Dorsett Fraley et al -- Continued under former order. Statesville Lumber Co. vs N. G. Holmes et al -~-- Continued under former order. Statesville Lumber Co. v8 N. G. Holmes et al -- Continued under fromer ordet’. Hillard Summers vs Gertrude Summers -~ Continued R. L. Dickend and Fannie Dickens ves J. P. Nicholson- Continued under former order. AUGUST ‘TERM, 1925. THURSDAY, AUGUST 6, 1925. J. M. Deaton vs Eugene Morrison et al -- Continued T. S. Patterson vs D. E. Stearns -~ Continued C. B. Freeze vs ire John L. Lowe -~ Continued Fannie Dickend and R. L. Dickens vs N. S. Souther and Pearl Souther -~- Continued under former order, w. C. Moore vs D. G. Wilson <= Continued by consent. Hazel Cline Pierce vs Herman Pierce -- Continued A. B. Johnson et al Stockholders vs Southern Show Case Co, Continued under former order. Kellogg Switchboard and Supply Co. vs Electric Supply and Construetion Co. -~ Continued. A. L. Helms vs L. W. Kerr -=- Defendant allowed 60 days in which to file his answer. f “4 De LAA D bl Juage Presidi and Holding ourts for the 15th dicial Diatrict. / IN THE SUPERIOR COUR AUGUST TERM, 1925" ” Second Week, Aug, 16, 1925, North Carolina, | 4 Iredell County. }¢ In the Superior Court Second Week, : August Term, 1925, Tiis Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock, A. M. Monday morning, August 10, 1925 when and where His 4 8s Hon- or Henry P. Lane, Judge presiding and holding courts of the 15th Jud ui o- cial District of North Carolina, is present and presiding, this th ‘ e Second week for Civil Cases at August Term, 1925 ’ “e M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Caro- lina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and law- ful men to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week for civil cases, to-wit: D. L. McCoy, Geo.H. Deal, Sam H. Kunkle, E. R. McNeely, F.C, Nesbit, L.L. Laneer, C. E. Fraley, J.E. Sprinkle, H.S. Morrow, P. W. Byers, W.C. Pou, F.B. Alexander, “.L. Jones, L.J. Harrington, W.B. Munday, A.J. Renegar, J.L. Arthurs, J.C. Murdock, Charlie Cook, and R. C. Shoemaker, The following were excused for lawful causes: C.E,Mills, J.F. Orren, am and O.H.Christopher,. The following was returned as, "Not to be found in Iredell County"; R.F.Waugh. North Carolina) In the Superior Court Iredell County) August Term, 1928. No. 178 Statesville Lumber Company JUDGMENT vs Je He. Knox This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before the undersigned, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court d defendant have from the admission of the parties that the plafhtiff an compromised all of their differences out of Court, by defendant paving Plaintiff $75.00. It is thereupon ordered and adjudged akkt that t tion and that the defendant pay the he plaintiff recover nothing further in this ac costs of this action. Henry Pe Lane ___ Judge Presiding By consent: Grier & Grier Atty. for plaintiff John A, Scott. Atty for defendent. MONDAY AUGUST ]Q, 1925. North Carolina: In the Superior Court August Term, 1925. . Ipedell County: No 218 E.F.Guilford Vs James A. Salter. i In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted tothe plaintiff? Answer; $228.32 with interest from May 9, 1925. This Honorable Court takes a recess August 11, 1925, at 9:50 A.M. until Tuesday Morning, AUGUST TERM 1925, TUESDAY AUG 11 1925, This honorable Court convened according to adjournment, Tuesda ’ 7 morning Aug. 11, 1925, at 9:30 O'clock A.M, for the dispatch of businesse North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: Aggust Term, 1925, No 179. D.F.Wallace vs JUDGMENT ee ef se ee ef Welborns Yark Company In this action it appearing to the Court that all matters in controversy have been agreed upon and settled by the parties hereto upon terms mutually agreed to by the parties, Now, therefore, on motion of John A.Scott, and Grier and Grier attorneys for plaintiff, and by consent of Zev. V. Long and Raper & Raper, attorneys for the defendmt, it is adjudged that the plaintiff D.F.Wallace recover of the defendant theartificial silk yarn attached in this action, with theright to take possession thereof and dispose of the same in any manner he sees fit. However, he is to return the bobbins on which the artificial silk yarn iswound to Read and Loveat, New York City, the lawful owners of the bobbins whenever the silk is unwould from the bobbings It is further adjudged that the plaintiff, D.eF,Wallace, shall and does assign and transfer to H. Gould Welborn all the shares of capital stock he owns in the Welborn Yarn Company, 64 shares of the par value of $6400. made up of certificate for 34 shares 2 certificates for 8 shares each, the same to be duly assigned and delivered to H. Gould Welborn and also 14 shares of the capttal stock in said Company in the name of D.F.Wallace, but which certificate D. Fe Wallace does not now have in his possession, the said DeF,Wallace to endorse the said certificate to H. Gould Welborn upon presentation of same and that the said D.F.Wallace releases the said Welborn Yarn Company and H. dually from all claims and demands against the said Gould Welborn personally and indivi 6f Whatever nature now existing, or claimed to exist, Gould Welborn individually. on to be taxed by the Clerk d the Welborn Yarn Company and H. - plaintiff is to pay the costs of this acti of the Court, : e. Judge Presiding. Henry P. Lane. Judg wat : er atty# for Defe By Consent: zeb V Long & Raper : Seas attys for grier & Grier & John A. D.F.Wallace Plaintiff Plaintiff Welborn Yarn Company, Defendant, by H.G.Welborn. Presidente AUGUST TERM 1925 TUESDAY AUGUST 11 1925. North Carolina: In the Superior Cart or ina: Iredell County:; August Term 1925 No 169 Marlboro Cotton Mills vs JUDGMENT Statesville Cotton Mills This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding and it appearing to the Court that plaintiff ana defendanthave compromised and settled all matters in controversy in this action, and that such settle- ment has been paid. It is now, by the consent of counselffor plain- tiff and defendant considered ordered and adjudged that this action be and the same is hereby dismissed. It is further ordered that the defendant, States- ville Cotton Mills pay the costs of this actione Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding By consent: Bynum & Henry attys for plaintiff Grier * Grier attys for defendant. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday morning August 12, 1925, at 9:30 A.M. Zl fs Judge Presiding/ & Holding Courts 15th Judicia strict of N. Ce AUGUST TERM 1925, WEDNESDAY’ UGUST 13, 1925 This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, Wednesda . v» a ee wee TPES, Gt 9580 O'CLOCK Am, tab Phe Mupedeh os baad usi-=- n6SSe North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: August Term, 1925, No. 194 L,.S.Golstein & David Lebovitz, stockholders of the defendant Company, in behalf of themselves and all other stockholders and creditors who may come in and make themselves plaintiffs. FINAL JUDGMENT vs ee 88 62 02 88 of @8 ee ee 28 os The Fashion Shop Itappearing to the Court from the report of Hon.W. D. Turner and W.A. Bristol that they have disbursed and paid out thefunds to the creditors in the above entitled cause, and have in all other respects fully complied with the oteen of the Court. It is, therefore, upon motion of Grier & Grier, Attorneys for the Receivers, considered and adjudged that the said W. D. Turner and W. A. Bristol, Receivers, be and they are hereby dis- charged from any all further liability. Henry P. Lane, Judge NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY: August Term 1925. Mae Paine Harbin vs W. H, Harbin This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of the Plaintiff to have a reasonable subsistence for herself and child and counsel fees allotted and ppid or secured to her from the estate and earnings of her husband, and being heard, the Court finds the following facts: WUTUST TERM 1925 WEDNESDAY AUG 12 1925 That the plaintiff and the defendant {ntermarried in Iredell County on or about the 10th day of April, 1921, and ever ince said time have been, and now are, husband and wife; that — 8 dunion and is now on March 19th, 1922, a child was born of saidunio residing with Plaintiff; that defendant, Will Harbin, has aban- doned the plaintiff and his child and has failed and neglected to provide them with reasonable subsistence, and that the plain- tiff and herchild are now dependant upon the earnings of the plaintiff and the generosity of plaintiff's parents for a home and their support and maintenance; that the defendant Will Harbin, left the State of North Carolina on or about tk 15th day of Februray, 1925, for Atlanta, Georgia, and is now in parts unknown and has contributed nothing towards the support of his wife and child since leaving the State; that the plaintiff in this action has no estate whatever but is dependant upon her la- bors and such aid as her father supplies her fop the support of herself and child; that the defendant, Will Harbin, is a strong able-bodied man, capable of earning ample funds with which to support himself and his wife and child, and in addition is seized of a one-eighth (1/8) undivided interest in valuable real estate in and near the City of Statesvil le, said property having been devised to him by his father, the late J. F. Harbin, and consis- ting of a one-eighth-(1/8) undivided interest in the following property: A house and lot in the city of Statesville on the North side of Alexander Street and extending several hundred feet along the east side of Race Street, adjoining the lands of Pearl West, Henkel-Craig Live Stock Company and others, and another lot in the city of Statesville situated on the north side of Alexander Street and on the west side of Race Street, adjoining the jlands of Richard Harbin, and others; Also a tract of land in Statesville Towship, Iredel1lCounty, adjoining thelands of James A. Hartness, the city of Statesville Pumping station lands and others, containing about thirth acres. The said J. F. Harbin died seized and possessed of all of the above described lands and referenceis hereby made to the title deeds of said J. F. Harbin for more particular description of all of said lands. AUGUST TERM 1925 WEDNESDAY AUG 12 1925 That by the terms of the Will of the said J. F, Harbin all of his real estate and personal property was devised to his wife, Mrs, Mattie Harbin, for and during the term of her natural life; that the said Will Harbin being out of the State and in perts unknown no notice of this motion could be served upon him; that the plaintiff has procured a summons in this action and a notice of this motion to be directed to the Sheriff of Caldwell County where he wasreported to be, and the Sheriff has returned said summons and notice that the defendant was not to be found and had not been in said County for the past two years but was supposed to be in Florida; that in order to prosecute this ac- tion the plaintiff will be required to pay reasonable attorneys fees in the sum of $200 and that in order to pay the same and to secure to her a reasonable subsistence for herself and child it is necessary to se- cure the interest of the said Will Harbin in the abovedescribed lands to the said Mrs. Mae Paine Harbin and her child, Will H. Harbin, Jr, It is, therefore, on motion of Grier « Grier, attorneys for the aefan plaintiff, considered, adjudged, ordered and decreed that the interest of the defendant, W.H.Harbin, in the house and lot in the city of Statesville adjoining the lands of Pearl West, Henkel-Criag Live Stock Company and others, lying on the north side of Alexander Street and the East side of Race Street, and the lot in the city of Statesville lying on the north side of Alexander Street and the West side of Race street, adjoining the lands of Richard Harbin, and others; also his interest in the thirty acres of land in Statesville Township, adjoining the lands of J. A. Hartness, the ckty of statesville pumping station lands and others be and the same is hereby allotted, secured and transferred to the said plaintiff Mrs Mae Pai ne Harbin, and her child, Will H. Harbin, Jr., free and discharge from all claims, title and interest of the said W. H. Harbin, defendant 4n this action, tn said real estate, the said plaintiff is to receive whateverrents and profits that may be derived from the interest of said W. H. Harbin in said lands for the subsistence of herself and child, and after her death said real estate is to be vested in the said W. H. Harbin, Jr. in fee simple. Ifiit becomes necessary to sell said lands the same may be sold and principal and interest derived therefrom may be used by the Plaintiff for the subsistence of herselfand said child under such terms and conditions as the Court may order. It is further considered and adjudged that ® copy of this decree be recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredet} County. Henry P. Lané@ Judge “Presiding & holding ¢0¥ Perera AUGUST TERM 1925 WHDNESDAY AUG 12 1925 NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY: August Term 1925. No 218 E.F.Guilford vs James A. Salter fhis cause coming on to be tried before Hon H. Pl Lane, Jydge, and a jury and being tried, and the jury having answered all issues in favor of the plaintiff, It is, therefore ordered and adjudged that the plain- tiff recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred and Twenty eight dollars and thirty-two cents with interest from 9th day of May 1925 and the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk. Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday morning, ) August 13, at 9:30 A.M. “nD LZ tv OD oO ng) Courts DistrYct AUGUST TERM 1925 THURSDAY AW 13 leas, North Carolina: Sh tie Bees suis Iredell County: Samant Stein Sikes No 20. Statesville Lumber Company, Plaintiff ~~ JUDGMENT Eugene Holland Defendant This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court pefore his Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Court having submitted, to the Jury the following issues and the Jury having answered said issues as herein set out, to-wit: 1. Did the Plaintiff enter into a writtencontract with the defendant wherein the defendant sold the plaintiff one hundred thousand feet of old field pine lumber at the price of $34.00 pr thousand feet to be cut from timber which defendant represented that he owned, and to deliver the same to the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 2. If so, was said representation false? Answer, ‘es. 3. Did the plaintiff relying on said representation, advance the defendant the sum of $350.00 in cash as payment on said lumber, as alleged in the complaint? Answer; ‘es. 4. Did the defendant afterwards falsely and frauduently repre- sent to the plaintiff that he had manufactured said timber into lumber and had the same on sticks ready for delivery according to contract? and did hex thereby induce the said plaintiff to advance him the sum of $250.00 on or about the 18th day of October, 1920? Answer; Yes 5. And did he by reason of such representation as mentioned secure the sum of $100. from the plaintiff on the 20th day of November 1920, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 6. Did the defendant fail and refuse to deliver said lumber to the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 7, If so, what damage, af any has the plaintiff sustained? Answer: $700. with interest from date of checks givens o the defendant, and if so, in the answer? on date of 8. Is the plaintiff indebtedt what amount, on his counterclaim, asalleged in e Answer: Yes $227.29 . We gave him market pric % ’ delivery for lumber delivered. AUGUST TERM 1925 THURSDAY AUG 15 1925 It is therefore upon motion of Grier & Grier, Attorneys for the plaintiff considered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant has been guilty of false and fraudulent representation whereby he induced the plaintiff to advance him the sums of money alleged in the complaint in and found by the Jury, and that smm/making said advances the plaintiff relied upon said representations. It is further considered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendant the sum of $700.00 with interest on $550.00 from March 30, 1920, and interest on $250.00 from October 18, 1920, and interest on $100. from November 2, 1920, until paid, subject to the credit of $ 227.29 as of September 3rd, 1921, this being the amount of the defendants counter-claim as found by the Jury. It is further considered and adjudged that if defendant fails to pay this judgment, that execution be issued against the body of the defendant as provided by law. It is further considered and adjudged that the defendant pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Courte Henry P. Lane Judge Presidinge NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY AUGUST TERM 1925 No 200. Ada Gibson ) vs ) JUDGMENT Alfred Gibson ee This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, be- fore His Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows: “ist: Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident and citizen of the State of North Carolina for two years priorto the beginning of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes AUGUST TERM L 1925 THURSDAY Aug 13 1925 2nd: Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged n the complaint? Answer, Yes Srd: Did the defendant, Alfred Gibson commit adultery as “alleged in the complaint? AhBwer: Yes" THEREFORE it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Ada Gibson, and the defendant, Alfred Gibson, be, and the same is hereby dissolved; and that the said Ada Gibson and Alfred Gibson be and they are hereby wholly and absolutely divorced from each other and from the bonds of matrimony, Further that plaintiff pay cost of this action. Henry. P, Lame, Judge Presiding. NORTH CAROLINA In the Superior Court IREDELL COUNTY Agaust Term 1925 No 146 Ee Re Brady ) ) vs ) ISSUES ) ) Pruett Hager & Guy Hager 1. Was the augomobile of the plaintiff injured by the negligence of Guy Hager, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2. Was Guy Hager the agent or servant of defendant Praette Hager at the time mentioned in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover ? Answer, $45.85. NC North Carolina: In the Superior Court Iredell County: August term 1925. No 146 E.R.BradyPlaintiff vs ) JUDGMENT Pruett Hager and Guy Hager Defendants AUGUST TERM 1925 THURSDAY AUG 12 1925 Tis cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, H. P, Lane, Judge, and Jury, and the jury having answered the issues sub- mitted to them as set out in the record, and for their verdict an- swered said issues 4n favor of the plaintiff and assessed his damage 3,85 it is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged, that E.R , at $4 f recover of the defendants, Pruett Hager and Guy Brady the plaintif Hager, the sum of $43.85 with interest from August 3 1925 until paid, and costs of action to be taxed by the Clerk against said defendants. Henry FP, Lane. Judge Presiding. Noe 146 A.D.Mctntyre VS ISSUES Praett Hager & Guy Hager 1. Was the automobile of the plaintiff injured by the negli- gence of Guy Hager as alleged in the complaint? Answer: yes 2. Was Guy Hager the agent or servant of defendant Praett Hager at the time mentioned in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3, Did the plaintiff, A.D.Mc+ntyre, contribute to the injury of his own property by his own negligence, as alleged in the answer? Answer: no 4. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer. $33. 75-6 North Carolina: In the sSuperior Court Iredell CountY: August Term 1925 No 146 A.D.Mc+ntyre, Plaintiff ) VS Judgment Pruett Hager &« Guy Hager, defendants AUGUST TERM 1925 THURSDAY AUG 13 1995 1 This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, H Tr, P, J Lane, “udge and J a “By dg ury, anc the jury having answered the issu ®@s submitted to them as set out in the record and for their verdict an sweredsaid issues in favor of the plaintiff and assessed his dam $ age at $335.75 It é is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged that A a e De McIntyre, the plaintiff, recover of the defendants, Pruett H ’ vt “ager and Guy Hager, the sum of $33.75 with interest from August i 8 3, 1925, until paid, and costs of action to be taxed by the Clerk 1e er against said defendants. Henry P, Lane udge Presiding. North Carolina: In the Superi or Court Iredell County: August Term 1925, No 2}9 H.E.Steele & wife Fairy Rosser Steele vs : Jd JDGME R.H,Wheeler & wife Isabel C Wheeler, saiscoese J.W.Anderson and wif e Anderson, H.A.Mill&sand wife Mary M{hlis; and J.E.Millis and wife Helen Millis, Mrs Sallie M, Armfield and husband W. J. Armfield, Jr. This cause coming on to be tried before Hon. H.P.Lane, Judge, and a jury, at the August Term, 1925, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being tried, and the jury having answered the issues sub- mitted to them as follows: "1, Did the southern States Realty Company, for valuable con- Sideration, in the year 1906, execute and deliver to D,0.Cowan a deed in fee simple to Lot No 4 in Block No 5 of the property of the Southern States Realty Company kmown as Park Place, a map of which is recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of IredellCounty, in book 33, Page 613? Answer. Yes 2. After the delivery of said deed, was said deed destroyed Prior to its registration? Snswer: Yes AUGUST TERM 1925 GHURSDAY AUG 15 1925 3. Was the Southern States Realty Company legally dissotveda on the 2ist day of October, 1910? Answer. Y@S-e 4. Are the defendants the surviving stockholders, directors and officers and heirs-at-law and distributees of the deceased stock- holder, officer and director? Answer: Yes ‘ 5. Are the plaintiffs the owners in fee of said land? Answer: Yes". It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs re- over of the defendants any interest which the defendant, or any of then, c or the Southern States Realty Co., have in said lot of land and that the plaintiffs are entitled to have the deed executed by the Southern States Realty Company to D. Y. Cowan for said lot of land restored and he lend conveyed in said deed conveyed to the plaintiffs. Vii It is further ordered and adjudged that John A.Scott, Jr., be, and he is hereby apnointed a Commissioner to dmake said deed and that he be, and is hereby authorized to execute and deliver to the plaintiffs a deed for said lot of land, conveying all the right, title and interest of the Southern States Realty Company, its stockholders, officers and directors and their heirs, representatives and assigns, and the right, title and interest of all of the defendants in said lot of lande Henry *. Lane Judge residing This Honorable Court Takes a recess until Friday “ornigg, Friday, August 14, 1925, at 9:30 A.M, udge Presiding 15th Judici AUGUST TERM, 1925, FRIDAY AUGUST 14, 1@25, No. 185 Cc. B. Stutts vs J. C. McLean What amount if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: We give the plaintirr $334.50; less $12.00 for use of car for eight (8) hours; plus interest from due date North Carolina, : In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § August Term, 1925, No. 185 Cc. Be Stutts vs JUDGMENT, J. C. MeLean This cause coming on to be heard at this Ferm of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard before His Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issue sub- mitted to them by the Court as set out in the record in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $322.50 together with inter- est thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the lst day of February, 1924 until paid, and that the said defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of thés Court. Henry P. Lane Judge presiding. North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. }$ August Term, 1925. No. 201 E.R.Brady and E.L.Brady, trading and doing business as Statesville Flint Co. vs Charlotte Flint Company. AUGUST TERM, 1925 FRIDAY AUGUST 14, 1925, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding, at this “erm of the Iredell Superior Court and it appearing to the Court that the part’ ss have settled their differences by agreeingt that the plaintire take judgment for the sum of $454.67 against the defendant and that the defendant pay the costs of this action; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum of $434.67, and that the said defendants pay the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Consent Judgment: Henry P. Lane ee ee Judge Presiding. ' “Attys for Plaintirr & Grier ale " “Attys for Plaintirr North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, { [Iredell County. }§ August Term, 1925. BOs Gil Effie Fletcher JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT, 4 ) vs $ ) t Dorsett Fletcher It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff through her coun- sel comes into open Court and takes a voluntary non-suit, Therefore it is ordred and decreed that the plaintiff be non~-suited and pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding. AUGUST TERM, 199 FRIDAY AUGUST 14, 1998. North Carolina, | | In the Sait duit , ee, ene» | August Trem, 1925, No. 198 A. S. Alley vs J. A. Perry & C, A. Hartline Term of the Presiding, tlement of Partnership between the par in which an accounting will have to be taken between the Partners, and that areference should be had in this cause, and it further appearing that the Plain-~- tiff and the defendants have consented to a reference, and it further appearing that they have agreed that the same should be referred to Honorable wW. pb, Turner: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be and it is hereby referred to Honorable 1, D. Turner, Referee, to take and state an account of the Partnership and dealings between the Parte ners, and to file his account and make his report showing his findings of facts and conclusions of lay to this Court, Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding North Carolina, } In the Superior Court Iredell County. | August Term, 1925, No. 199 A. S. Alley t vs } ORDER, } } GC. A. Hartline & J.A. Perry This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court before His Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that thia action is for a settlement of a partner- ship between the partners in which an accounting will have to be taken between the partners, and that a reference should be had in this cause, 8nd it further appemming that the plaintiff and defendants have consented to a reference, and it further appearing that they have agreed that the Same should be referred to Honorable W. D. Turner: AUGUST TERM, 1925. Friday August 14, 1925. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be and it is hereby referred to Honorable W. D. Turner, Referee, to take and state an account of the partnership and the dealimgs between the partners, and to file his account and make his report, showing hid findings of facts and conclusions of law to this Court. Henry P. Lame. Juage Presiding North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | August Trem, 1925. No. 189 Feilden M. Privette “ JUDGMENT. John M. Privette This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, H. P. Lane, Judge Presiding, and when the case was called for trial, the plaintiff in the action failed to appear, whereupon, he was called out to appear and prosecute his action, or non-suit would be entered: Therefore it is ordered that the plaintiff be and he is hereby non-suited, and thet the costs in this action be taxed against the plaintiff, Feildon M. Privette, and his bondmmen, S. G. Sloan and J. S% Redman, by the Clerk of this Court, and the attachment proceeding be and the same is hereby set aside. And ifafurther appearing to the Court that on the 19th of May 1923, the plaintiff sued out an attachment against the property of the defendant, who at that time was a non-resident of the State of Nopth Carolina, and service of the summons was made in said cause by publication by order of the Clerk fo Superior Court, and on the 19th day of May, 1925m J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court, issued @ warrah of attachment against the defendant, which was received by the “neriff of Iredell County and on May 26th 1923, he levied on the lands of the defendant, situated in Iredell County, New Hope Township, on Rocky Creek, containing g2 acres, more or less, and being Lot No. 1 in the division of the land in the Special Pro- ceeding entitled "S. R. Privette vs J. M. Privette et al, 8°° report of commissioners in said case, as recorded in Spepial Proceeding Book No.11 page 164, for detailed description of said land, and it further appearing from the records that the Sheriff sold said lands and conveyed title then’ to to one 8S. J. Sloan: AUGUST TERM, 1925 FRIDAY AUGUST 14, 1925, It is they efore considred, ordered and adjudged, a » 88 provided ecti by 8 on 492 and 805 of ConS. St. of North Carolina, that th ’ @ plain- be and he is hereby ordered and directed to restore to the defendant all damages that he has suffered b e y reason of tiff, Feilden M. Privette, the attachment proceeding aforesai d, the levy of ‘ the Sheriff and th e sale of his real estate, and conve y to the defendant the real estate sold and ossess him > + p of the same, omd it is further adjudged that the Clerk of thi 3 Court in taxing up the costs against the Plaintiff and his bond smén, as aforesaid; that he shall tax up all costs incident to said attachme t nen pro= ceeding and paid into the office of the Clerk of Superior Court ana and paid to the sheriff for'serving of the papers and all other costs incurred th eB in and marked to use of the defendant, Henry P, Lame Judge Presiding os ; , NorthyCarolina, 4 In the Superior Court, Iredell County. i August Term, 1926. No. 79 W. R. Kelly ( James M. Richardson 4 § vs j SUDV Gas Ee, } j This cause coming on to be heard at this, the August Term of Iredell Superior Court, before his Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding and it appearing to the Court that the summons in the above entitled action was issued on the sixth day e@f of September 19235, and was served in the defendant James M. Richardson on the eighth day of September 1923, and taht a duly verified complaint was filed in the of- fice of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the fifth day of October 1923 alleging that the defendant was due the plaintiff the sum of $325.00 with interest on the same from the 23rd day of August 1923 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, until paid, that said indebtedness was evidenced by a promisory note bearing date of -__ 1923. The Court finds that no answer is filed in the above en- titled case. Wherefere, it is ordered adjudged and decreed by the Court # that the plaintiff recover of the defendnat, Janes Richardson, the sum of $325.00 together with interest on the same from the gard day of August 1925 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annwl, together with bhe Coste of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. AUGUST TERM, 1925. Friday August 14, 1925. Norbh Carolina, In the Superior Court, ! Iredell County. } August Term, 1925. No. 186 Stearns Bros. INnCe, vs 4 4 ) JUDGMENT. : 6 w. R. Hart & A. C. Hart. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding, on 4 motion to remove this cause to Durham County for trial and it appearing to the Court that this is an action for the recover of a sum of money due a note assset forth in the complaint and that the ancillary proceeding of claim and de- livery is incidental thereto and for the purpose of foreclosure and application of so much of the proceeds as may be necessary to the sati- sfaction of the judgment on the note aforesaid: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the order or judgment of the Clerk of this Court in denyimg the said motion be and the same is hereby affirmed, and said motion of the de- fendant for removal 4s denied. ( Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding No. 186 Stearns Bros. vs W.R. & A.C. Hart. From the judgment as signed above the defendant takes an appeal to the Supreme Court. By consent the defendant allowed 40 days in which to serve statement of case on appeal, and plaintiff 10 days thereafter to serve countercase or file axceptions.e AUGUST TERM, 1925 Priday August i4, 1925, Tredell County. w+ August Term, 1925, No. 117 L. W. Malcom, Admr, of W. F. Malcom, deceased, vs JUDGMENT, Mooresville Cotton Mills. This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court before His Honor, Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and bei heard and the Court having submitted to the Jury the a. 1 ni and the Jury having answered said issues as follows, to-wit: aie 1. Was the death of plaintiff's intestate caused by the neg- ligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, 2. Did plaintiff's intestate by his own negligence contribute to his death, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. 3 What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover from the defendant? Answer: It 1s therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover nothing of the defendant. It is further considered and adjudged that the defendant re- cover of the plaintiff and his prosecution bond its cost of action, and that plaintiff pay the cost of this actiom to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Henry P. Lane Juage Presiding AUGUST TERM, 1925. Fréday August 14p 1925. No. 117 W. Le Malcom, Admr, of W. F. Malcom, Decd. vs Mooresville Cotton Mills, The plaintiff moved to setcaside the verdict as being against the wait of bhe evidence, and for errors assigned and to be assigned,, Motion overruled. Exception. Plaintiff moves to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence ana the Court overruled this motion. Exception by the plaintiff. Judgment signed. Plaintiff excepts to the signing of the judgment and gives notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. Notice given in open Court, Further notice waived. Appeal bond in the sum of $100 required or affidavit in lieu there6f to appeal in forma pauperis. By consent, plaintiff allowed 30 days in which to serve statement of case on appeal, and defendant 30 days thereafter to serve countercase or file exceptions. No. 203 E, B. Gilleland vs S. A. Minges In this case the plaintiff 4s allow 30 days in whish to file amended complaint. Defendant allowed 5O days thereafter to file answer. No. 90 Statesville Lumber Co. Vse Eugene Holland. The defendant moved to set aside the verdict as being 4~ gainst the weight of the evidence, for a new trial. Motion overruled. Plaintiff excepts. Notice of appeal to Supreme Court given in open Court. Appeal bond in the sum of $75.00 required. By consent, plaintiff allowed 20 days in which to serve statemant of case on appeal, and defendant 20 days thereafter to serve countercase or file exceptions. j 8 AUGUST TERM, 1925 FRIBAY AUGUST 14, 1925. North Carolina, In the Superior Court dell County. Ire 7 August Term, 1925, A. B. Johnson, individually, and a stockholder of the Southern lag ' Case Company. vs JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION Southern Show Case Company. It appearing to the Court from the report of the receiver in this action that the assets of the corporation have been collected and disbursed by the receiver, in accordance with Section 1198 of the Cons. Sty, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Southern Show Case Co. be, and the same is hereby dissolved, and it is ordered that a copy of this judgment be recorded in the record of corporations in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and in the Secreta of State at Raleigh, N. C. Henry P, Lane Judge Presiding. North Caroila, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} August Term, 1925. Re. A. Cooper, Pattie B. Cooper and J. E. Deitz etal. vs JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION. Cooper Purniture Company. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, and it appearing from the final report of the Receiver fited at this term, that the assets of the Cooper Furniture Company have been Col- lected and disbntbuted by the “eceiver, as provided by law., It is therefore, pursuant to Section 1198 of the Consolidatd Statutes, ordered and adjudged that the said Cooper Furniture Compamy b¢; and the same is hereby dissolved and its corporate existence terminated and it is further ordered that a copy of this judgment be recorded in the Record of Corporations in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court # of Iredell County and in the office of the secretary of state of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Henry P. Lane —ge presiding. AUGUST TERM, 1925. Friday August 14, 1925. No. 184 -- Tri-State Tranpp. Co. vs Stearns Bros, Iredell Co. et al. The plaintiff moves that the action of Tri-State Transportation Co. vs Stearns Bros, and Iredell County and Globe Indemnity Co. be refurred. Motthon denied, without prejudice to any motion for reference taht may be made later when all parties have had the opportunity to come in and intervene. The plaintiff moves that the action of Tri-State Transportation Co. vs Stearns Bros. and Iredell County be referred,. Same ruling as under first motion. The plaintiff moves that the action of Tri-State Transporta- tion Co. vs Stearms Bros. be referred. Same ruling as under first motione “4 Lliam Torrence vs J. C. Brookshire In this case the defendant failed to answer and prosecute his action. Defendant called out. Appeal dismissed. Cost of this ac- tion to be taxed against the defendant. No. 202 Sprott Bros. vs Lizzie Poteat In this case the plaintiff failed to answer and prosecute his action, Piaintiff called out. Appeal dismissed. Cost of this ac@ tion to be taxed against the plaintiff. North Carolina, | In the Superior Court » . Iredell County.) § Before the Clerk, Maase & Kemper, Inc., vs Ww. M. Freeze. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this ae was had by personal service, and that the complafnt has been filed more than twenty days, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the re- turn date set forth in said summons, and that the complanit was duly verified and filed before said return date, and that this is a oe a note, being for a fixed certain amount, the said amount being for the sum of $376.45, together with interest thereon from the 17th dav of March 1924 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file answer or demur to the complaint as provided by law: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $376.45 with interest from the 17th day ofMirch 1924 until paid and for the costs of this action to be taxed by this Court. This the 17th dag of August, 1925. J. A. Hartness Tlerk Superior court, Iredell County. QXA LXIQCOCCOCOOOLOOE AQQQCQQQQOCOLOMHIAE North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Befeor the Clerk. W. A. Bristol i vs { E. S. Goodin, and witel Carrie Goodin 4 ( We, E. S. Goodin and Carrie Goodin the defendants in the above entitled action hereby confess judgment in favor of W. A. Bristol ize the plaintiff in the action in the sum of $530.55 and we hereby author the entry of judgment against us the said E. S. Goodin and Carrie Goodin on the 17th day of August, 1925. This confession of judgment is for a debt now justly due by us the said E. 3; Goodin and Carrie Goodin defenflants to the said A. Bristol plaintiff arising out of a note in the sum fo $400.00 e 4th day of October, 1920 and payable to D. P. W. executed by us on th year after date drawing interest at 6% per annum payable Sartin one annually which said note was purchased by W. A. Bristol for a valuable consideration from B. P. Sartin. And we hereby acknowledge and certify that this said sum of $530v755 is due to the said plaintiff over and above any and all claims or demands that we have against him. E. S. Goodin (SEAL) Carrie Goodin (SEAL) EB. S. Goodin and Carrie Goodin each being duly sworn each for himself and herself doth depose ang say that the fact stated in the above con- fession are true and that the amount of the judgment confessed is justly due the plaintiff. E. S. Goodin Carrie Goodin Sworn to’and subscribed be foreme, this the 17th day of August, 1925. J. A. Hartness Gs we wa Cost $8.90 paid by plaintiff same being in full. J. A. Hartness, C.S.C. North: Carolina 1 In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk, J.4.Morrison, Grocery & rroduce Company, j vs PJUDGMENY BY DEFAULT #INAL H.C Hunter ' Tnis cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Glerk of the Superior ucurt, on Monday, August 24,1925 ana being heard, and it appearing tc the Ccurt tnat service of summons in this action was duly made upon the defendant on the 24th day of duly 1925, by delivering copy otf summons and copy of tne varified complaint to tne detendant, u1.U.Hunter, and the detendant has failed to tile an answer within twenty aays atter service of said summons and varitied complaint in said action, that said suit is upon a varitied account due by the defendant to the plaintiff. and it ap- pearing to the court as set up in the complaint that the defendant is indebted to the plaintitf in tne sum cf yS58.¢1 and interest from duly Srd., 1925, until paid. it is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover ot the detendant the sum of ¥65%,51 and interest tnereon from July 3rd,1925, until paid, and the cost ot this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this CUcurt. Clerk superior Court this Aug. 24th,1925 North Carolina, 6 In the Superior Court, ) Iredell County. 4 Before the Clerk. Cc. F. Patterson, trading and do- ing business 46 The City Market.. ve JUDGMENT. R. E. Bizzell and Mrs. R. E. Bizzell. This causecoming on to be heard and being heard bef6re the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Gourt of Iredell County on Monday, the 24th day of August, 1925, and it appearing to the Court and the Court finds as facts that notice of this action and of the issuing of the sun- mons and the warrant of attchment, stating the names of the parties plaintiff and defendants, the amount of the claim, and in a brief way the nature of the demand, and requiring the defendants to appear at the time sand place named in gaid summons and answer or demur to the comp- laint of the plaintiff, has been duly published as the law directs, ana that the summons and warr ant of attchment issued in this action have been duly served by said publications, and that the defendants are justly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $274.00 together with interest thereon from the lst day of June, 1925 unbil paid at the rate of six per cent per annum , same being due for goods wares and merchandise sold and delivered by the phaintiff to the defendants being a certain stated amount, and that the plaintiff filed a duly ~~ verified complaint in this action on the 27th day of July, 1925, and that the defendants have failed and neglected to file an answer or de- mur to the said complaint within the time allowed by law: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $274.00 together with in- terest thereon from the lst day of June 1925 until paid, and that said defendants pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, and that execution be issued to the sheriff or other lawful of@ ficer of Iredell County commanding him that out of the property levied upon he satisfy the Judgement aforesaid. This August 24, 1925. J. A, Hartness v Clerk Superior Court Treaell Bounty. North Carolina ‘ In the Superior Court 3s Iredell County. Before the Clerk, The Merchants and Farmers Bank Mooresville, N. C. -VS- R. L. Shuford and Mrs. M. S. Brawl Admrx. of R. V. Brawley,deceased. ‘a This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Itedell County, North Caro- lina, amd it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was served upon each of the defendants by personal service, and that the complaint has been filed more than twenty days, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date set forth in said sume mons, and that the complaint was duly verified and filed before said return date and that this is a suit on a note, being for a fixed and certain amount, said amount being in the sum of $1400.00, together with interest thereon from the first day of January, 1925 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum and that defendants or either of them has failed and neglected to file unswer or demur to the com- plaint as provided by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover off the defendants the sum of $1400.00 with interest from the lst day of January 1925 until paid and the costs of this ms action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 7th day of September, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. North Carolina, in the Superior Court lredell County. statesville Lumber Company, ' vs bod cC.W. Jenkins ‘ This cause coming on to be heard,and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff filed ite duly verified complaint in the above en- titled action on August 3rd,1925, and that summons and a copy of said complaint was served on the defendant on said Srd day of August,1925; and it further appearing that this is an action on a note to recover the balance due thereon of ¥690.00 with interest from the list day of Aaugust,1925, until paid; and it further appearing that the defendant secured said note by a certain conditional sale agreement wherein title to the truck described in the second paragraph of the complaint was retained in the xepublic sales vorporation of Charlotte,N.c., and that the plain- tiff is now the owner of said note and conditional sale agreement, same having been duly transferred and assigned to it by said nepub- lic sales vorporetion of Uharlotte,N.v.; and it further appearing that more than twenty days have elapsed since service of the summons and copy of the complaint in this action was made on the defendant,and that no answer has been filed. it is, therefore,considered and adjudged by tne vourt thet the plaintiff recover of the defendant the gum of 9890.00 with in- terest from the lst day of august,1925, until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the ulerk of tne court. it is further considered and adjudged that the plaintiff is entitled to the possession of said truck for the purpose of sale as provided by law and it is hereby ordered and decreed that the plain- tiff recover the possession of said truck and that it advertise and sell the same,agreeably to the provisions cf law,and apply the pro-~ ceeds thereof, first, to the payment of the cost of tais action,and any balance to be applied as a credit on this judgment;end in order tc protect its interest plaintiff is hereby allowed to bid on and purchase said truck at said sale. ywois monday, september 7th,1925- J.A,Hartness i Clerk superior Court, iredell County North Carolina, lredell County {In the matter of J.M-Kincaid it appearing to the undersigned,ulerk of the superior court that the said v.w.Kincaid was arrested and imprisoned for the issuance of a bad check, and that he wes up for @ hearing be- fore the necorders vourt in this vounty on August the Zlst,1925, when and where it wes ordered by tne said necorders vourt that the matter be referred to the Clerk of the superior Court with direction to said Clerk to investigate and determine the mental condition of the said J.M.Kincaid,and to make such order as the Clerk shall deem best in the cause. wherefore, I the undersigned cler«,hed the County vPhysician to mace an examinetion cf the said dJ.li.Kincaid,and the gaid County Physician having made guch examination and reported to this court that dJ.ki.Xincuid is 4 habitual drunkard and has been so for a long time and was confined in the Western state Hospital of virginia for tne treatment of mental defectives,and inebriates,and that he is mentally unbalanced and physically, unable to undergo corporal punishment. It is therefore, ordered by the court and adjudged that the defendent J.M.Xincaid be returned to the state of Virginia, dis home gtate, where can undergo further treatment which is nec- essary. it is ordered that he be conducted to the state of Y irginia. Yhis the Srd day of september 1925. J.a-Hartness Clerk of superior Court statesville,N.C. gept.Srd,1925 To whom it may concern: This is to certify that I have examined Mr. J.M.Kine- kaid and find that he is 6 habitual drunkard and hes escaped inia and 1 recommend that he the Western state Hospital of virg be returned to this institution. Koss § ,McElwee J.W.Redman,M.E,Redman, irustee, i chas.C.Tharpe and 4.d7,Anderson and Bristol Thar pe, rustee,and wad Bristol and 1.N.Brown and D.L. Brown trading 4s T.N.Brown and son REPCRT OF COMMISSIONER CF plaintiffs vs | RE-SALE OF J&NE SOWERS LAND SHOWING FINAL DISTRIBUTION FUNDS, Jane Sowers or i.J.Sowers 4 To the Hon. J.AeHartness,.S.C. of iredell County: The undersigned commissioner respectfully shows to the court that under and by virtue of an order made in this cause on the ord day of June ,1925 he re-advertised the two tracts of land directed to be re-advertised and re-exposed the same for sale on Tuesday, vuly 14,1925: That tne first tract consisting of 124 acres was bid off by Sherrill for the sum of ¢55.00 an acre;that the bid on the second tract of 45 acres for 950.00 an acre was not raised; Your commissioner further shows the court that in his Opinion that the price bid on said lund was not @ fair and adequate price aud recommends that the bids be not confirmed; your commissioner further shows the court that since said two tracts of land were advertised for sale the defendant in the action hus made arrangements to berrow the money to pay off her creditors tne balance due them and that the tract of land lying in Bethany ‘“ownship consisting of 124 acres and & tract of land lying in Bethany yvownship consisting of 43 acres are to be withdrawn from the sale; your commissioner furtner shows the court that the following is the amount of money received by him from the sale of the lands on the first sale and a distribution of the proceeds arising from said sale: Received from W.4.Bristol in payment of the purchase price of the tract of land containing 119 acres and known as the tuck tract and situate in voolsprings Township for more accurate description see petition ~------ 94600. 00 Keceived from W.B.Crawford in payment of the pur- chase price of the tract of land situate in Bethany Township containing 24 acres edjoining the land of Bert Crawford et al. for more accurate description see peti- tion eoeeeeeeeeseeeseeeseeeeeseeeese® coseecuceseqgeneeeaee tt? received interest on $750.00 eneseevecevneees eeeee ers? 7.60 otal i ee Your commissioner has distributed said funds as foll Ollows: Paid to W.A.Bristol in full satisfact judgment ion of his oO Oe eee errr ererccces ce co SOLS, 50 Paid H.A.Anderson in f aed caat ull satisfaction of hig e TIC CEO RS OOOOH ER OO es 066 6 hs 6 oe 435.36 Paid ?.N.Brown & Sons Me ieee rk re 45.20 WATE Ge GE DONTE secccctdocccccs COCCCHC COC OS ECR EEO ROLCCS 126.45 Paid tax in Cool Springs ‘township... CoCo reer erreccecesecces cee 4,97 Paid JvJ.W.Redman in part satisfacti of his judgment Se Seer eeeeeseeseserececees ot0G2,02 votal amount distributed by commissioners ........ $557. 50 Your commissioner further shows the court that the balance due J.W Redman by vane Sowers on his judgment and the amount due Chas.t, Tharpe by said dane scwers on his judgment has been settled by the said Jane Sowers her note covering said balance and by giving to Chas. C.Thnarpe her note covering tne amount of his judgment which said notes are secured by & mortgage deed of trust executed by the said vane Sowers on this date to W.A.Bristol,irustee. this tne Srd day of seotember,1925. P.P.Dulin Commissioner “his cause coming on to be heard on the report of the above commissioner and it ap-earing to the court that the amount offered for the 124 acre tract of land and the 423 acre tract of land sit- uate in Bethany township was not « fair and reasonable price for said land and it further appearing to the court that it is the re- commendation of the commissioner not to confirm the price offered on the resale for the said two tracts; and it further appearing to the court that the commissioner sold a tract of land in cool springs 1ownshipto W.AeBristol for $4600.00 and sold the tract of 24 acres in Bethany Jownship to W.B. Crawford for %750.00 and that the price received for these two tracts is a fair and reasonable price and that it is the recommen- dation of the commissioner to confirm the sale of the tract of land to W.a.Bristol for $4600.00 and to confirm the sale to W.B. g to the court that g2.50 Crawford for $750.00 and it further appearin the total amount received for the two tracts of land plus accumulated interest amounts to #5357. 50 and that the amount dis- tributed by the commissioner is 88 follows: Paid to W.4.Bristcol $613.50 A. d. Anderson 425.36 4.N.Brown and Sons 45.20 Tax in spethany fownship 54.97 Court cost 126.45 paid J.W.Redman in part on his judgment 4082.02 votal % 5,057. 50 and it further appearing to the court that the balance due J.W.Redman and the amount due C.C.Tharpe has been settled by the defendant, Jane Sowers giving to J.W.kedman a note covering the bal- ance due him and giving to vuhas. C,Tharpe her note ccvering the amount due him which said notes are secured by a deed cf trust ex- ecuted of even date; Ana it further appearing to the court that the two tracts of land situate in Bethany yowuship, the tract consisting of 124 acres and the other consisting of 46 acres have been withdrawn from sale under we former order of this court. lt ig therefore considered, ordered and adjudged first: that the sale of tne two tracts of land in spethany township the one con- sisting of 124 acres and the other consisting of 43 acres be with- drawn from sale aud that the sale of said lands be rejected and not confirmed. second: nat the sale of the tract of land in Bethany iown- ship consisting of 24 acres to w.B.Crawford be confirmed. whird: what the sale of the tract of land in Cool springs yvownship to 4.a,Bristol consisting of 119 acres be confirmed. rourth: wnat the report of the commissioner showing the re- ceipt of 5357.50 and nis disbersement of that amount as shown in this report be confirmed. “his the 3rd day of september,1925. J-AeHartness C.e sue DPBS RS EK SK RH KEK RR KH KERTH North Carolina, § : In the Superior Court, Iredell County. }§ Beltre tha He erk, A. S. Alley vs JUDGMENT, C. Ae Hartline Th i e ore the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 2lst a ¢ st day of September, 1925, and it appearing to the Court that this i 8 an action t . aku & on note, being for a certain stated amount, and that the defendant i efe a in e eé ° p aintiffr - re « i n the sum c IO J 27UsiOl th ntver 8 KnRR thereon from the 30th day of April, 1919 until paid at the rat c ° > rate of six per cent per annum, and that said defendant has failed and neglected t 2 e Oo file an withir i answer or demur within the time allowed by law: It is therefore,ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $565.00 together with inter- est thereon from the 50th day of April, 1919 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that the said defendant pay the costs of this actin to be taxed by this Court. This September 21s J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court Iredell County. plas North Carolina, ; In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk. Jas. E, Tharpe and R. W. Windsor vs JUDGMENT. ' ' ) ) ' f D.B. Heath Motor Co. This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs and defendant have compromiséa and settled their d@fferences, and that the defendant has paid the plaintif the sum agreed upon and the Plaintiffs have come into Court before the Clek and requested permission to take 4 voluntary non*suit; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiffs be ahd they are hereby non-suited, and that the said defendant * be taxed with the cost of this action. This the 18th day of September, 1926. , Az Hartness In the Superior Court, North Carolina, ; Iredell County. ) Before the Clerk. Cc. F. Lineberger vs JUDGMENT. P. H. Rose and W.. &. Haithcock This matter coming on to be heard, and it appearing to the Court that this was an action instituted by the plaintiff against the defendants growing out of a collisioémmbetween the plaintiff's autamobile and that of the defendants, ana that prior to the filing of the complaint the parties have compromised and settled all matters and differences between them, the defendants agreeing that plaintiff is entitled to *50,00 damage, and that the defendants are not entitled to any damage against the plaintiff; and it further appearing that the defendants have paid the plaintiff said damage: It is therefore, by consent, considered and adjudged that u the action be and the same is hereby dismissed. Tis September, 25, 1925. J A. Hartness ___, Clerk Superior Court. By consent: Grier and Grier __ Attorneys for plaintiff Turner & Turner Attorneys for defendants North Craolina, }§ In ®he Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. D. W. Speaks, Administrator d.ben. of C. A. Wise,deceased vs Mrs. W. L. Lambert,executrix of} Mrs. Matilda ise,deceased and } W. W.Mayhew, T. H. Williams and Cc. » *Neal. This cause doming om to be heard and peing heard pefore the undersigned Cle’k of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 2lst day of September, 1925, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff comes into open Court and asks that he be allowed to take @ non-suit: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Saas Se at this cause be and the same is hereby non-suited and Cismissed a : » and it is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the c ‘ osts of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court This September 21, 1925, J. A. Hartness _ Clerk Superfor Court Tredell County. QOD AK MQGQ2 QAXGAAD AKID North Carolina, In the superior Court, iredell County befcre the clerk. HeaeSmith,W.Pexedman, and G.m.Young, ¢ and m.Lesristol, trustee for w.m.rYcung, and W.r.nedman, ¢ vs : mOollie A. Lazenby and her husband #.Hi. Lazenby ‘ “nis cause coming on to be heard and being neard on the 17th day of August,1925 before tne undersigned v.a-enmartness,l.5.l. ot saredell Ccunty and it appearing to the court that the summons in this action was issued on the l6th day of duly,19<25 and return- able on the 27th day of vuly,1lyc5: P And it further appearing to tne court that the seid summons and a verified copy of the complaint filed inthe action was served on the defendsnts mollie a.Lazenby ana her husband p.a.Lazenby on the 16th day of duly,1925 by reading said summons and said verified copy of the complaint tc tne defendants and by leaving & copy of said summons and complaint witn tne said defendants: and it turther appearing to tne court that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date of said summons and no answer or demurrer has been filed bytae defendants; ring to tne court thet the defendants e sum of go, 729,40 6 until and it turther appea &re indented to the plaintitt d.a.omith in th with interest thereon from this the 17th day of august, 192 paid; ndaebted to tne plaintirf Were eon from this the shat the defendants are i sxedman in the sum of. 9534.00 witu iuterest ther 17th day of august 1925 until paid; wnat the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff G.M.Young in the sum of $542.20 with interest thereon from this the 17th day of august 1925 until paid; And it further appearing to the court that the indebtedness due to the plaintiff H.4.Smith is secured by @ mortgége deed on certain lands as described in the complaint of the said plaintiffs and as described in said mortgage; and it furtner appearing to the court that the indebtedness of the plaintiff W.P.Redmen and the indebtedness of the plaintiff G.M. Young is secured by & mortgage deed of trust on said lands described in the complaint of ssid pleintiffs and in said deed of trust; And it furtner appearing tu the court that the line of 4.4.Smita is tne first lien on the property described in the mortgage executed and delivered to him by the defendants and that the lien of the plain- tiffs W.P.Redman and G.M.Ycung is a first lien on a part of the property described in tae deed of trust securing their notes and 4 second lien on the remainder of said property described in said deed of trust. It is therefore considered,ordered and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff 4.4.Smith, recover of the defendants the sum of g5,729.40 with interest on said sum from the 17th day of August1925 until paid which said sum shall constitute and be a first lien on the property described in the mortgage deed executed by the defend- ant d.a.Smith; Ghat the plaintiff &8.P.csedman re-cover of the defendants the sum of $634.00 with interest tnereon from the 27th day of sugust 1925 until paid. wnat the plaintiff G.M.Young recover the sum of $643.20 with interest thereon fromthe 17th day of August 1925 until paid; “hat the amount re-covered by the plaintiffs W.P.Redman and G.MieYoung shall constitute a first lien on thet part of tne property described in their deed of trust not set forth in the mortgage of H.A.Smith and shall constitute a second lien on that part of the property as described in the mortgage from the defendants to the said H.A.Smith; “hat the plaintiffs recover from the defendants the cost of this action tobe taxed by the court. it is therefore further ronsidered ordered and adjudged bY the court that this judgment be a specific lien upon the land described in the complaint of the pleintires: That all rights and equities of redemption of the defendant ants in said property ove and the same ig hereby closed; It is further adjudged by tne court that Buren durney be anf he is hereby appointed a commissicuer of this court to sell the land belonging to the defendants es described in the complaint filed in this cause at public auction for cash after giving due advertisement as acquired by law and «sfter giving notice as ace quired by law at the court house door in the city of statesville and at four other public places in iredell Ccunty onthe 12th day of October,1925 at 12 o'cloc« noon and report his action in the premises to the Ulerk of Superior Court of tredell County within ten days after said sale. it is further ordered and sdjudged that the commissioner shall pay cut cf the proceeds arising from said sale the cost and expense of s&le and shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount due them according to the priorities of tneir liens and the remainder if any to tne defendant Mollie A,Lazenby. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff or either of them may be allowed to bid on the land of tne defendants et the sale of said commissioner. And this cause is retained for further orders of the court. this the 17th day of August,192o dJ.4-Hartness C.gscs PRERET POR DE DERE ae OE North Cerolina, : In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. First National Bank, Mooresville, N.C. a JUDGMENT. Ss. R. Brown, N.D.Tomiln, & Mrs. R.V. Brawley, Admrx. of R.V. Brawley, dec'd. This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing that the sum- mons was issued and complaint filed on the loth day off Sept. 1925, complaining for the failure to pay promissory notes, and it furbher appearing that summons and copy of complaint were served on the de- fendants, N. D. Tomlin and Mrs. R. Vv. Brawley, Admrx. of R. V. Brawley deceased, on Sept. 12, 1925, it furbher appearing that the complaint was duly verified and that more than twenty days have elapsed since service of summons and copy of complaint on the said defendants that no answer has been filed. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum of Seven’ hundred twenty-nine and 75/100 Dollars principal sum with interest on Three Hundred fifty Dollars of said amount from Nov. 9, 1922 at six per cent per annum due and payable annually and interest on the balance of $379.75 from Sept. 28, 1922 at six per cent per annum due and payable annually and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This Monday, Oct. 5, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. HOCOC f CCQOEOCCECE @OECO COE CROHEECE CE 609 North Carolina, } ) In the Superior Vourt, Iredell County. } Sterling Mills, Inc. vs JUDGMENT, Carey C. Boshamer and J.J. Hartigan, Partners Trading as Cleveland Feed Company. ee A This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that the defendants have settled with the plaintiff and that the costs of this action have been paid. It is now, upon motion of FE. M. Land, attorney for the plaintiff, ordered and adjudged that this action be, and it is here 49 . i > by dismissed. This the 5th day of October, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court. Iredell County. $ W. L. Lockman, Jr. by hid Next Friend,W.L. Lockman, Sr. vs JUDGMENT. Eugene Tate. This matter coming on for hearing before the undersigned; and it appearing that the matters and things in controversy between the parties have been fully cempromised and settled by the defendant HUNDRED ($500.00) DOLLARS, in 225,00) DOLLARS paying to the plaintiff the sum of FIVE addition to the sum of TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE ($ plaintiff; and it appearing f has fully recover~ ons which heretofore paid by the defendant to the from statement of Dr. Taylor that the minor plaintif ed from his injuries and that the settlement herein made is is fair and just to the minor plaintiff;. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintire have and recover of the defendant the further sum of RIVE HUNDRED ($500) DOLLARS heretofore paid, is in full compromise settlement and compensa- tion for the injuries sustained by plaintiff, as alleged in the comphaint herein; and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. AND IT IS ORDERED that the sum of $250.00 be paid to Buren g Jurney, attorney, for prosecuting this claim, and that the same be paid out of the recovery mentioned herein. This, the 9th day of October, 1925. J. A. Hartness @lerk Superior court of Iredell County. We consent: __Buren Jurney Attorney for Plaintiff Js Be Flowers Attorney for defendant. After inquiring into the settlement referred to in the fore- going judgment, and having ascertained that the minor plaintiff has fully recovered from his injuries; and it appearing from statement of Dr. Taylor that he has fully recovered; and the father of the minor plaintiff having stated to the Court that in his opinion the fore- going is a fair settlement: [It is found as a fact that the said settlement is fair and just to the minor plaintiff, and the same is, in all respects approved. This the 16th day of October, 1925. Henry P Lane Jadge Holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina. @Q0RBe QQQECQVAE:G@BQ Q4Hs@e LEQZCQGE@ INTHE SUPERIOR COUR NOVEMBER TERM . MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1925, A D EXHCUTIVE DEPARTMENT STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS » The Hon John M, Oglesby, assignedby law to hold the Superior Courts of the 19th Judicial Dist ee ee. aii ©. tan, axetenns Kae for the FALL Term, Courts of the 15th Judicial District for eh mit oe agreed to exchange the Courts of the Parti ee une |} -icular counties hereinafter named in their said respective districts for said Fall Term, 1925; NOW THEREFORE I Angus Wilton McLean, Governor of the State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in my by law, do here- by consent to said exbhange, and do hereby authorize the said Hon, John M. Oglesby to hold the said Courts of the county of Iredell, one week, beginningNovember 9th, 1925 in the 15th Judicial District in lieu of the said Hon. Henry P. Lan’ for said Fall Term, 1925; and the said Hon. Henry P. Lan@ is hereby authorized to holdthe said Courts of the county of Buncombe, one week, beginning November 9th, 1925 in the 19th District in lieu of said Hon. John M. Oglesby forsaid Fall Term, 1925, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heretnto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State to be affixed, this the third day of November, in the vear of our Lork one thousand nine (The GREAT SEAL OF THE hundred and twenty-five, and tn the STATE OF THE NORTH CARO- one hundred and fiftieth year of our LINE) American Independence. A. W.McLean Bythe Governor: Cc. H, England, Private Secretary. NOVEMBER TERM 1925. MONDAY NOVEMBER 9, 1925, NORTH CAROLINA: In the Superior Court IREDELL GUNTY} Nov. Term, 1925. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the 9th Monday after the lst Monday #é othe Stat in September, 1925, the same being the 9th day of November, 4. D., 1925, when and where His Honor, John Me Oglesby, Judge Presiding, is present and presiding, he having exbhanged districts with the Hon. Harry P. Lane, said exchange being consented to by His Excellency Governor, Angus Wilton McLean by virtue of authority vested in him by law. The Hon. Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M, P.,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: The following were drawn as Grand Jurors for the Lerm: George Gillespie, J. M. Lentz, E. R. Rankin, P. M. Morrow, J. Be Houston, C. “. Summers, P, Le Shinn, EK. H. Killian, J. F's Newton, J. Le Shinpock, J. D. Lee, G. W. Wallace, M. W. Thomas, c, L, Sherrill, D.W.Goodin , Re. L. Brantley, J. L, Goodman, and R. G. Edwards. KE. R. Rankin was appointed and sworn as foreman of the me Grand Jurye 0. B. Lazenby wassworn as officer in charge of the Grand Jurye The following were returned, "Not to be Found": C. T. Cristy, Re M. Davis, and D. L,. Rumple. L, P, Henkel was returned as being sickean® The following were excused for good and sufficient reasons: D. E. Turner, T. M. Asbury, /oe Clarke, V.C.Montgomery, w. F. Alex- ander. The following were peturned wai aworn as Petty Jurors for the week: C. W. Green, W.D.Smith, J, G.Benfield, W. P. Roberts, D.L.Sell, A. We Johnson, E. A. Stroud, R. N. Sloan and Fred W. Sherrill. The following were picked up and sworn as Tales Jurors for the week: J .A. Reavis, Foy Deal and ¢: A. Brady. NOVEMBER TERM 192 MONDAY NOVEMBER 9TH, i 925 No 535 6 State § vs $ R.O.Kyles 4 FALSE PRETENSE Continued under former ordep _ GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS 8 Cc , os ontinued under former order R O Kyles No 79 TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR State TraxdeSendank ;xRagaxkakayxamkkadxexRatiad Vs tudgmentxhiek xd a 2 ckx«Ra ; R Boss Reid Alias Capias, oss Reid to appear in Jan. 198 No 106 TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOODBEHAVIOR State Judgme C , at Judgment, Continued under former order, Robert Ruff No 1a3 TRANSPORTING & POSSESSING LIQUOR — Nol Prossed with leave Tyree Johnson No 113 FORGERY “tate Nol Pr vs Gladys Phifer ossed with leave No _ 1354 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON or Prayer for Yudgment continued Buck Psatkkner No 153 PERJURY State Nol Prossed with leave vs Henry Holmes No 157 TRANSPORTING AND POSSESSING LIQUOR State Continued for defendant Vs Doy Shoemaker No 158 FORCIBLE TRESPASS State Defendant comes into open Court and pleads VS guilty of forcible trespass. Major Foote It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that on recommendation of the Soticitor judgment be suspended upon payment of the costs to be taxed by the Clerk @ the Conbt. No 159 FORCIBBE TRESPASS State Defendant comes into open Court and pleads Vs Guilty of forcible trespass. Alex Young it 4s ordered and adjudged by the Court that on recommendation of the Socicitor judgment be suspended upon payment of costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. NO 5148 LARCENCY State Defendant calledand fai led Ms Judgment: Nisi Sci Fa and Capias Willie Bell This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, November 10th, 1925 at 9:30 O'clock A.M. Qe a - uae Pres ding ee a for phe 15th Judic Hid a NOVEMBER TERM 1925 Twuexnaay NOV, LO, 1925 This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, at 9:30 O'clock, A. M. on the 10 day of November, 1925 for the dispatch of business. SEDUCTION, This cause coming on for hearing before His Hori- or John M. Oblesby Judge Presiding and the defendant having plead not guilty to the charge of seduction under promise of marriage but pleads guilty t8 the charge of Fornication and Adultery, which Plea the State through its Solocitor accepts: It is therefore considered and adjudged that the defendant Bingham Cook pay a fine of One Dollar and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk up- on the condition that said defendant pay to Cordie Blackwelder the sum of Three Hundred Fifty ($350.00) Dollar@, which amount has been paid, No. 156 State vs Bingham Cook SD I DE I NH SN EE oe No. i256 EMBEZZLEMENT, State Continued by consent. vs Dewey L. No. 146 ABUSE TO FEMALE UNDER SIXTEEN YEARS OF AGE. State By consent consinued until Next Term of Superior vs Court. Clarence No. 149 HOUSEBREAKING AND LARCENY, State This defendant being under sixteen years of age vs it is ordered by the Gourt that this case be re- Rufus Stevéngon manded to the Juvenile Court for hearing. FALSE PRETENSE, Continued by consent. No. 154 1 State { vs (} Will Walson § No, 147 State vs 7% Ed’ Bumgarner {1 4 STOREBREAKING AND LARCENY. § The defendant comes into open Court and through } his counsels H.J. Burke and Buren Jurney pleads § guilty of storebreaking and larceny as charged in / { the bill of indictment. ai ) It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that Cw Z i(the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of } Iredell County for a period of TWO YEARS, and as- 4 signed to work on public roads of said county for } said period, to wear stripes. if No. 155 { ASSULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON h State 4 The defendant comes into open Court and throug vs iy)? his counsel John L.Davis pleads not guilty. ee James Dorset ie Xf hearing the evidence the defendant enters aplea 0 ) guilty of assult with deadly weapon. the : | It 1s ordered and adjudged by the Court that Wr] | defendant pay a fine of $50 and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court,. NOVEMBER [rR a TURSDAY NoVEUBER 17, 1925: 1925, At @ meeting of the Bar it Was moved Court adjourn November ii, World War Armistice, 3 No. 142-3-4%5 State The defendants Come inte o vs their counsel] Theo Winfred ® John A. Grace Gamble Karl Clark Broadus Torrence Harvey Massey and Harvey | Jail of Ire and a8 signe for said period of SIX capias to issue on ates any law of North Months; not to wear stripes; motion of Solivitorif he viol Carolina within Two YEARS, It 1s further ordered that the defendant Tr I er 7 sc 1a 20 - i sorrcn tu No. 160 ASSU ‘ITH DEADLY WHAPON, State Continued by consent, vs Sam Holmes This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Mornirig, November 12, 1925., at @:30 O'clock A. M. ol a Judge Presiding an&k Holding Courgs for the 15th Judtcial District ae betta Te a This Honorable Cor 9:30 O'clock A. M. of business. No. 141 State vs Glenn Woodall No? 16182 state vs Glenn Woodall No 150-151-152 State Vs Lee Dellingef Rufus Dellinger Garland Miller NO. 155. State vs James Dorsett — NOVEMBER TERM 1925. THURSDAY NOVEMBER 12, 1925. rt convened according to adjournment, at on the 12th day of November, 1925c¢ for the dispatch LARCENY. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of larceny as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the State Prison of North Carolina for a term of ONE YEAR at hard labor, to wear stripes. INJURY TO BUILDING AND BREAKING JAIL. The defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty of injury to building and breaking jail as charged in the bills of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the common jail of Iredeil County for a termof TWELVE MONTHS, and assigned to work on public roads of said copnty for said period, not to wear stripes; capias to 4ssue on motion of Solicitor in event he violate any law of the State of North Carolina within TWO YEARS. Judgment to take effect at the expiration of first sentence. LARCENCY The defendants come into open court and through their counsel, Lewis & Lewis, plead guilty of Larcency of property underethe valué of $20. which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the state. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendants, pay a fine of $25.00 each and the cost of this action. It is further ordered that the defendants each be confined to the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE MONTHS and (assigned to work on the public roads of said County for said period to wear stripes; Capias to issue in jail sentence on motion of Solicitor if they violate any law of the State of North Carolina within two years. JUDG 5 In this case it appearing that the defendant 4s unable tonpay the fine and cost imposed on him by the Court, the former judgment is therefore, hereby striken out and the following judgment is hereby im- posed in lieu thereof to-wit, that the defendant be and he is hereby sentenced to the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX MONTHS to°be assigned by the County Commissioners to work on public poads ° said county for said period. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that vhe defendant shall pay all costin thts case6 to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. this case, on Recomendation of the Solicitor it ordered by the Court that the judgment imposed the Justice of the Peace stand and this action settled. NOVEMBER TERM NOVEMBER 12, 1935.°°° North Carolina . n the Superior Court Iredell Count ” November Term - 1925 Hon. Jno. M. Oglesby, Judge Presiding: We, the Grand Jury, f ¥Y, for the November Ter m of Iredell Count y Superior Court, 1925, beg leave to submit the followin & report; e and have made due return of same to the Court The County Jail was visited and thsre wasfound to be 10 white and 9 colored prisoners, a total of 19, all male. These r t ? eported that they were well fed and cared for, We wish to commend the jail ; : @ jailer upon the clean and sanitary condition of the building. This buildd e 1 ng appeared to be in good repair. We visited the County Home by Committee and found 18 white females, 12 white males, 5 colored females, 10 colored males, a total of 45; of this number $ are blind. The inmates report that they have plenty of nourishing food properly prepared and served, also suitable clothing and bedding. The premises appear to be kept clean and in a sanitary con- dition. The live stock are in good condition and farming land show it to be in fine state of cultivation. We would recommend that the buildings be painted in the near future. ‘We visited the chain gang by Committee and found 7 white and 9 colored prisoners, a total of 16. They report that they are well fed and cared for with no complaint as to mistreatment. The camp appeared to be in sanitary niall eto. Ample supplies of food and feed, with tools and livestock in good conditéon. The Court House was closely inspected and appears to be kept clean and sanitary. We find that the inside walls and woodwork are badly in need of paint. The steps to the basement should be replaced as they show much wear. The vaults in both the Clerk and Register of Deeds Offices do not appear to be fire proof and would prove most hazardous to the County records in case of fire. This should be givan {immediate at- tention, We were strikingly impressed with the crowded and congested condi- tion of a11 of the offices and it would seem that the proper functioning of each of the departments is greatly hampered by lack of rpom and that the Present size of the building is wholly inadequate for the volume of trans~- actions handled, We respectfully recommend that the County Commissioners give nditure of probably from be provided to this matter full consideration for with an expe $25,000.00 to $50,000.00 adequate additional space could Satisfactorilly handle the County effairs for an indefinite period. Respectfully gubmitted, &. E.R.Rankin, Fone NOVEMBER TERM 1925 THURSDAY NOVEMBER 12, 1925. No. 195 North Carolina In the Superior Iredell County November Term w. L. Brown vs JUDGME Consolidated Panel And Veneer Company This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before his Honor, J. M. Oglesby, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and the defendant have compromised their aifferences, and that the plaintiff desires to take a voluntary non suit, It is therefore ordered and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff's cause of action be, and the same is, hereby non suited. Jno. M. Oglesby, Judge Presiding @aa@e2a@e No 223 North Carolina In The Superi r Court Iredell County November Term, 1925 A. L, Helms Vs JUDGMENT L W Kerr This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor John M. Oglesby, Judge Presiding, and being heard and it appearing that the parties to this action have settied their differences out of Court and it further app earing that thecost has been paid. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that this action be and the same is hereby dismissed. Jno. M. Oglesby, Judgee NOVEMBER TERM 1925 THURSDAY NOVEMBER 12, 1925 T, D. Shuford VS W. R. Hart « § Ince CONTINUED ummers & McAuley & Stearns Bros, Hazel Cline Pierce VS Herman Pierce -- CONTINUED Kriesman & Israel VS Dillon-Vitt Underwear Co.- CONTINUED Mrs William Wallace VS American Express Co, - CONTINUED T S Patterson VS D E Stearns - CONTINUED w. W. Rankin Co VS J W Newton - CONTINUED T. Ross Alexander, Ine VS John L. Schultz&-Son Inc. CONTINUED A. W. DuiasVS North Carolina State Ovtometr CONTINUED BY CONSENT. ptometris Society et at L., A. Thompson VS Brown & Dodley - CONTINUED BY CONSENT E. E. Harmon VS R. G. Brown and J. EK. Dooley - CONTINUED BY CONSENT w. J. Mullins VS J, FE. Dooley - CONTINUED BY OONSENT Emma Young VS H. F. Moore and Carl Beaver - CONTINUED James Dorsett VS Thomas Walk and Robert Walin- CONTINUED P. C. Jurney VS Stearns Bros. Ine - CONTINUED No 242 North Carolina In ,he Superior Court Iredell County November Term 1925 Dorsett Fletcher Vs Effie Fletcher lst. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry 48 alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 2nd. Did the defendant, Effie Fletcher commit adultery 4s alleged in the comp;aint? Answer: Yes 3rd. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident and citizen of y e or the State of North Carolina for more than five successive years Nn xt pri to the commencement of this actim as alleged in the complaint? Answer: yes NOVEMBER TERM 1 9 2 5 THURSDAY NOVEMBER 12 1925 No 242 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County November Term 1925 Dorsett Fletcher vs JUDGMENT Effie Fletcher This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before “is Honor, John M. Oglesby, Yudge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows: "ist. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes end. Did the defendant, Effie Fletcher commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes 3rd. Has bhkhe defendant been 4 bona fide residentand citizen of the State of North Carolina for more than five successive years next prior to the commencement of this action as alleged xs in the complaint? Answer: Yes." THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decredd by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Dorsett Fletcher, and the defendant Effie Fletcher be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff Dorsett Fletcher is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, “uffie Fletbher. It is further ordered by the Court that the plaintiff be taxed with the costs of this action by the Clerk of this Court. John. M. Oglesby Judge Presiding 15th Judicial District. CA DQDLQODXIILLIDQ No 79 WR. Selly vs J. M, Richardson NOVEMBER TERM1 1925 THURSDAY NOVEMBER 12 1925 This cause coming on to be h ard before the undersigned Judg presiding and holdigg the Superior Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, and being heard upon motion of the defendant to set aside the judgment granted at the August Term 1925, and to permit him to restore his answer heretofore filed to the record, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff admits that the defendant never re- ceivéd notice that counsel would be allowed to retire from the case and his answer stricken out unless he arranged with said counsel to conduct his defense, ahd that therefore said judgment was taken against the defendant because of his inadvertence, surprise and excusable neglect; It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment heretofore entered in this case at the August Term 1925 be and the same is hereby stricken out and the defendant 4s allowed and permitted to refile his answer in said case; It is further ordered that the transcript of the judgment to the Court of Forsyth County be and the same is hereby ordered stricken out and cancelled and the Clerk of the Superior Court of said Vounty is hereby ordered and directed tocancel and strike out said judgment from the records of said Court upon presentation to him of certified copy of this judgment. Jno WR Oglesby. Judge presiding and holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Approved: first week November term by exchange. Buren Jurney Attorney for Plaintiff rims ean ae es. len ~ Bod i é Grier & Grier a Attorneys for Defendant No, 2il G. H. Bostain vs NON«SUIT. J. As Pooi The parties to this action having adjudged their dafferences, ; dged the plaintiff comes into sourt and takes a non-suit. it is adjudg laintiff, which he has paid, see that the cost be taxed against the P Cash book #5 page 88. NOKEMBER TERM? 1925. THURSDAY NOVEMBER 123 168s. North Carolina. } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 November Term, 1925. I. W. Copeland § vs § JUDGMENT. Mary Rivers Copeland § This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, John M. Oglesby, Judgm Presiding, and the Jury; and the Jury hav- ing answered the following issues which were submitted to them by the court as follows, to-wit: lst. Were the Plaintiff and defendant married, as alleged in complaint? Answer. Yes. ond. Has plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina five (5) years next preceeding commencement of this action? Answer. ¥es 3rd. Has plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for five (59 successive years next preceeding commencement of this action, during which time plaintiff lived in North Carolina, Answer. Yes. Now therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court: : ist. That the bonds of matrimony existing between the said plaintiff and said defenfant be and the same aré hereby dissolved abso-~- lutely, and that said plaintifs, J. W. Copeland, be and he 4s hereby granted an absolute divorse from the bonds of matrimony with and from the saia defendant, Mary Rivers Copeland. 2nd. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that said plaintiff be and he is hereby relieved and released of any and all liability and demand for maintenance and support of the said defendant, and that s&id defendant be and she is hereby denied all right of dower or any other interest whatsoever in and to the property estate and belongings of the said plaintiff. 3rd. that the plaintiff pay all costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerknof this Court. John M. Oglesb JUDGE PRESIDING. NOVEMBER TERM, 1925, Thursday November 12, 1925, No. 147 6 State t ) ' vs JUDGMENT, Rd Bumgarner. In this case the former plea made therein and former judgment of the Court is hereby striken out and the following plea is tendered through Buren Jurney counsel for defendant, and accepted by the State, and the following judgment pronounced to-wit: lst. The defandant Ed Bumgarner pleads guilty to the count and charge as found in bill to the larceny of prersonal property of the value of $100 2nd. Tne defendant pleads guilty to receiving personal proper- ty to the value cf $100 knowing same to be stolen property. Judgment of the Court is that on the first charge for larceny of said property the defendant pay fine $100 and all costs of Court in his case. In the second count of receving stolen property worth $100 knowing same to be stolen the judgment of Court is that the defendant be assigned to work on public highways of the County of Iredell for period of TWO YEARS, capias not to issue on this sentence on following express condition, to which the defendant agrees: (1) that he apply himself to some honest occupation so far as he may be phisicially able so to do for a period of FIVE YEARS, (2) that he leave Iredell County and not return to said County forperiod of FIVE YEARS. Upon violation of ang of foregoing conditions if shall be the duty of the Clerk of this Court upon motion of the ‘Solicitor toe issue capias for defendant. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this County to apprehand him and deliver him to the keeper of the Chaingang of Iredell County. No. 79 W. Ke Kelly 4 t ' 4 vs 4 NON=-SUIT 4 4 J. M. Richardson The Plaintiff in the abve intitled action comes into open akes a voluntary non-suite Court by his Attorney Buren Jurney and t tiff in this action It is therefore ordered that the piatn tthe be and he is hereby non-suited and the cost be taxed against Plaintiff. NOVEMBER TERM, 1925 Thursady November 12, 1925. Carolina 4 North 7 November Term, 1925. Iredell County. q No.113 J. M. Deaton os AGREED FACTS Eugene Morrison& Adelaide Morrison In this case the parties waive trial by jury and agree to the following facts: Ist. That on March 20th, 1920, H. Clarke and Wife conveyed the property described in the complaint to E. Morrison. 2, That on December 1, 1920, E. Morrison and wife, Adelaide Morrison conveyed the property to J. M. Desaton,said deed containing the following covenant and warranty clause: “anda the said Eugene Morrison and wife, Adelaide Morrison covenant with said J. M. Deaton, and his heirs and assigns, thatvthey are seized of said premises in fee, and have right to convey the. same in fee simple, and that the same are free and clear from all encumbrances, and that they will warrant and defend the said title to the same against the claims of all psprsons whomsoever, except the mortgage aforesaid and life insurance premiums aforesaid which is assumed by said party of the second part." 3, That on February 1, 1920, the City of Statesville commenced work on improving the street abutting on said property, and on May 1, 1920, gaia City of Statesville commenced improving the sidewalk abutting on said property, said improvements having been compleated on Sept. 21, 1920 the said City of Statesville passed an ordinance assessing the property for its pro rata part of said improvements aggregating for street and side- walk, $725.29 4. That all necessary notices and ordinances required by the Gharter of the City of Statesville were duly passed and given that were necessary to the validity of said assessments. 5. That the Charter of the City of Statesville is contained in Chapter 243, Private Laws of 1911, the particular sections relating to the street and sidewalk improvements being Section 39 and 49 {nclusivé; and the above named assessments were made pursuant to said Chapter and 1aWe 6. That E. Morrison did not pay any of said assessment prior to the convevance off said land to said J. M. Deaton; that afterwards, to- wit, October 6, 0923, J. M. Deaton paid said assessments and interest aggregating $682.60; and before making said payments, as well as after making said payments, demandedthat Morrison pay same. éxbBwis & L wy 4- aed be Bacoke bel * P o 4 am WE ca ch al NOVEMBER TERM, 192 Thureday November 12, 1028" North Carolina, Tredell County. ' No. 113. j J. M. Deaton. 4 ) § ) ' va JUDG@MEN®, ) Eugene Morrison & Adelaide Morrison} This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court ber ertore His Honor, John M. Oglesby, Judge Presiding, and being heard, the parti : , aryvies plaintiff and defendants having wafvetea jury trial and wieeed ts 0 ' e facts as set ount in the record, which agreed state of facts the Court approved and finds to be the facts in the case, and it appearing to th 4 Court from said agreed facts and the 6harter of the City of Statesville that the said street assessments are payable in ten annual equal instal and as further set ‘ lments from and after the commencement of such work, /and taut tee fives annual installment of the assessment in this case was not due until Feb- ruary 1, 1921, and that the deed from Eugene Morrison and wife was execut- 4 ed and delivered on Devember 1, 1920. The Court is of the opinion that said stwpeet assessment liens are not encumbrances until and as they suc- cessively fall due; It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover anvthing in this action, and that the defendants recover their cost of action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court and go mereoftwithout day, and that plaintiff pay the costs off action. John M. Oglesby Juage presiding and holding the first week of the November Term ]925v of Iredell Superior Court. J. M. Deaton vs for judgment Eugene Morrison & 4 4 § 4 Plaintiff in apt time moved 4 Adelaide Morrison. 4 upon the agreed statement of facts. Motion over ruled. Blaintaff* exeepted' to! the judgment signed ty! His Ronort Jutige..John..M0glasby;and’ appealed to the supreme Court. Notice of and bs appeal given in open Court,further notice watveds'), Plaintiff allowed by agreemenb of counsel for defendants 60 days to serve case on ap~ r peal. Defendant allowed 60 days thereafter to file counter ¢&sé@n © exceptions. Justified bond in the sam of grooreduinede NOVEMBER TERM, 1925. Thursday November 12, 1925. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. November Term, 1925. No, 205 E. B. Gilleland vs Ss. A. Minges This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor J M Oglesby Judge Presiding , and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff through his comnsel, comes into Sourt and takes a voluntary non-suit. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff's cause of action be and the same is hereby non-suited. It is therefore ordered by the Court that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Vourt. John M. Oglesby Judge Presiding. No. 203 BE. B. Gilleland vs Defendant moves to dismiss this action for failure to file amended complaint. Pending said motion plaintiff takes 4 voluntary non- suit as set out in record. Motion of defendant denied for reason that plaintiff takes non-suit. No. 196 ) W. C. Hinshaw 4 vs 4 ORDER J. V. Mize 4 In this case it is ordered by the court that the jury be withdrawn and a new trial ordered, and cause placed on calander for trial. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning November 16, 1925, at 10:00 O'clock, A. Me NOVEMBER TERM, 1925, Monday November 16, 1925, North Carolina, } In the Superior Court Second week 7 Iredell County. § November Term, 1925 This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 oclock, A. M. Monday morning, Novemberl§6,1925 when and where His Hon- or Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding and holding courts of the 15th Judi- cial District of North Carolina, is present and presiding, this the Second week for Civil Cases at November Term, 1925, M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week for gtk civil cases, to-wit: C.M. Steele, J.P. Williams, S.G. Sloan, S.S. Ham, tw E.D. Brady, C.C. Stearns, T.F. Kaggerly, Reid R. Morrison, R.F. Byers, P.M. Barger, H.D. McLean, J.H. Shuford, J.W. Eudy, J.J. Lytton, Lee C. Goodin, A.B. Parker, W.C. Thompson, R.R. Goodnight, L.B. Patterson, H.B. Collins, W.D. Cook and J. A. Perry. R. G. Hudspeth was excused on account of sickness, having a doctor certificate. Wade H. Cook was returned not to be found in Iredell County. North Carolina, } Iredell County, }¢ No. 176 ‘ F. &. Shinn { 5! vs ; JUDGHENT. ) J. A. Fortner, O.L. § an? W.B. Johnson. ' Tis cause coming on to be heard at this Term, the plain- e tiff asks to withdraw his appeal and that the judgment of the Justic of the Peace taxérigthhe cost of this case be affirmed, and it appear ing that the note has been paid, and ITis, therefore, adjudged that the appeal be withdrawn 4s here- the judgment of J. W. Lazenby taxing the cost be and the same by affirmed. Henry P. Lane Judge brostding. NOVEMBER TERM 1925 NOVEMBER TERM, 1925. MONDAY NOVEMBER] 16 1925 Monday November, 16, 1925. % 629 William Torrence VS J. C. Brookshire - Continued. Kellog Switchboard and Supply Co. VS Electrid Supply and No 61 Construction Co. Inc. - CONTINUED. Hilliard Summers VS Gertrude Summers - CONTINUED No 66 Bank of Stony Point Vs D D Littlejohn et al - CONTINUED James W. Brown VS T. 0. Teague - CONTINUED. Vallie Carter VS James Carter - CONTINUED No 83 - R F Gwaltney VS R H Mason - CONTINUED urs D. J. Williams VS R. C. Query et al. # CONTINUED No 68 - R L Dickens © Fannie Dickens VS J P Nicholson - CONTINUED J. B. Colt Co. VS E. Pruitt Hager - CONTINUED N1 135 - Bessie Houston VS tvey Houston - -CONTINUED C. C. Heath VS Sarah Heath- CONTINUED No 139 - W W ldcGowan et al VS Walter Beckham et al # CONTINUED Ww. G. Hayes VS H. C. Hunter and Emma Hunter - CONTINUED to 1 ne 2 as, “ K L Dickens VS N S Souther & Pearl Souther Carl H. Mathis VS Cleo Mathis - CONTINUED 154 Sigmond Rhinehardt Co VS J L Harris et al- CONTINUED . R. Bowles Vs W. H. Belk and J. M. Belk = CONTINUE he? 7 ” 160 wc doore VS DG VYilson - CONTINUED Apra Sharpe VS Ruffus Sharpe - CONTINUED. . . 136 C D Freeze VS Mrs John L Lowe - @®© NTINUED Cleveland Feed Co. VS John L. Shultz and Son Inc. CONTINUED 165 Brown Construction Co VS KR M Hudson & Co & Maryland 7". N. Brown VS R. L. Church - CONSINUED Causalty Co - CONTINUED 4 180 Statesville Lumber Co Vs J P Chapnel & Alice Chapnel I. %. 8 lman WS Iredell U holstered Furnéture Co. CO®INUED poolm 11 Up )FINUE CONTINUED No Statesville Oil Co. VS James Watts - CONTINUED . 184- Trt State & Transportation Co VS Stearns Bros Inc & No 235 - De W. Speake ADM.,C.A.Wise VS Mrs.W.L.Lambert?Extrix etal CONTINUED Globe Indemnity Co - CONTINUED No.236 - Cherry-Basset-Winner Co. VS W. E. Selby. - CONTINUED. 293 = Dorothy Gill VS O H Hester - CONTINUED o.241 - J. H. Cloaninger VS R. C. McConnell - CONTINUED. J ~ Garris VS Stearns Bros Ine - CONTINUED Jenkins Hardware Co. VS Stearns Bros Inc, Foster & Cockie No S L.Ellis Hayes,Admr of M. L. Campbell vs Columbus Campbell- . and State Highway Commission - CONTINUED CONTINUED UNDER FORMER ORDER Mrs. Louisa Haves vs Columbus Campbell - CONTINUED UNDER FORMER ORDER Merchants and Farmers Bank of Mooresville VS D. A. Beam and Le A. Beam - CONTINUED UNDER FORMER ORDER: No 86 J. He MeBlwee VS Hutton and Bourbonn&is Co. - CONTINUED J B Houpe A. J. Keller and wife VS Charlie Hicks and wife -mCONTINUED vs W. T. Wedster and W. Jd. Matheson VS J. S. Setzer CONTINUED Della Houpe Statesville Lumber Co. VS R. L. Church and C. “,. Grant- CONTINUED UNDER FORMER ORDER. In this case the plaintiff failed toanswer shé prosecute Statesville Lumber Co. VS Epps Harris and Ba Nicholson- his action, Plaintiff calledo ut, - Cost of this action taxed oe CONTINUED UNDER FORMER ORDER. against the plaintiff. Jas.C. Davis,Director General of Railway vs Cleveland Mfg Co. CONTINUED UNDER FORMER ORDER. No 198 dantg are allowed 50 days Jas C. Davis,Director General of Railway VS Statesville Veneer AS Alley In this case the defendants to file exception Company. - CONTINUED UNDER FORMER ORDER. after the 2st day of Nov 1088 of Referee's Report. Pastntat? allowea 30 Gnysecthere- v 4 vs i § after to file exception. ) § W. CG. Wooten et al VS Iredell Farmers Union Warehouse CO- CONTINUED UNDER FORMER ORDER. , ¢ A leeelio ar née L. B. Hollar VS Jesse Miller - CONTINUED. allowed 50 days Ho 199 In this onee Se detente 1088, 0 file exception ASA gist day of — ot notenas « Report. Plaintiff allowed 30 days Statesville Lumber Co VS NG Holmes et al ~ CONTINUED : . partline thereafter to file exceptions ; erry StatesvilleLumber Co VS L W Westmoreland - CONTINUED Statesville Lumber Co VS Dorsette Frailey et al - CONTINUED Statesville Lumber Co VS NG Holmes et al * CONTINUED Statesville Lumber Co VS N G Holmes etal - CONTINUED NOVEMBER TERM 1925 NOVEMBER TERM MONDAY NOV 16 1925 No 9 State of North Carolina: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT County of Iredell: NOVEMBER TERM 1925 w G Johnston et al Vs F 4 Shoaf This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Henry P, Lane, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that plaintiffs in the above entitled action who were Directors and Trustees of the Interstate Realty Company, 4 corporation, which has been dissolved, have elected to accept=the sum of FIFTEEN HUNDRED AND SIXTY-KIGHT ($1568.00) DOLLARS in full of the note sued on in this action and in lieu of a half interest in the lands alleged to have been bid in by defendant Shoaf for himself and said Interstate Redlty Company as tenants in common arid have agreed that legal title to said lands and all right, title and interest, if any, of said Interstate Realty Company shall vest in said F. H. Shoaf free from and discharged of all claims of every character whatsoever of the Interstate Kealty Company and the plaintiffs herein; Therefore, upon motion of Z V Turlington, Attorney for plaintiffs, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiffs have and recover of F ™ Shoaf defendant, the sum of Fifteen Hundred and Sixty-Eight ($1568.00) Dollars without interest, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, and it is further ordered, ad judged and decreed that the title to said lands be and the same is hereby vested in said F H Shoaf free from claims ofevery character whatsoever of the plaintiffs herein and said Interstate Kealty Companye This the 135th day of November, 1925. Henry P. Lane, Judge Presiding. No 240 North Carolina; In the Superior Court Iredell County: John H. Mck&lwee Vs JUDGMENT ~ D S Thomas and wife Addie Thomas, W. E. Selby and wife Elvy Selby, Re. S,. McElwee and wife Estelle McElwee, Mamie McElwee, John N, McElwee, Wm. Henry McElwee, Sarah Cranor McElwee, and Francis Elizabeth McElwee oe a OO ee a NOVEMBER TERM 1925 MONDAY NOVEMBER 16th 1925 This cause coming on to be heard, and being h e Honor, Henry P Lane, Judge Presiding the Meteentin tuiterel beneiee: , and it appearing from the Comp&aint and the Answer of the defendants, that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief prayed for in his com- plaint: It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged, by con- sent of the parties hereto, thats the defendants, who are the heirs at law of Mary V. McElwee, deceased, are holders of the title to the lands described in the plaintiff's complaint, in Trust for the use and benefit of the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff is en- titled to have the same conveyed to him in satisfaction of said Trust; It is further considered, ordered and adjudged, that Dent Turn er be, and he is hereby appointed Commissioner of this Court, and is authorized and directed to conveyto the plaintiff John H. McElwee, a fee-simple title in and to the lands described in the complaint, free of the Trust aforesaid of Mary V. licwlwee, and the defendants who are herérs at law, and who have heretofore held the title to sd a property in trust for the benefit of the plaintiff, John H. McoKlwee. Let the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff. Henrv P Lane Judge Presiding in the Fifteenth Judicial District. By Consent: Turner “ Turner, Attorneys for plaintiff H A Cranor Attorney for defendants. Repth eae No 231 North Carolina: [rede 1 County: In the Superior Court November Term 1925 John Morton ' vs ) ISSUES 4 q Carrie Morton wed 1. Did the Plaintiff and defendant intermarry 48 alleg in the complaint? Answer, Y@8-« 4ff and defendant lived separate and 2. Have the plaint ars prior to the commencement apart for more than five successive y® and was said separation of this action as alleged in the complaint; il complain without fault of the plaintiff 4s alleged in thecomp Answer, Yes. ic ile state : si 3. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide re 4 to of North Carolina for more than five years pr Cs of this action as alleged NOVEMBER TERM 1925 OMONDAY NOV 16 1925 North Carolina No 231 1 IN the Superior Court ' =o Iredel 1 County November term 1925 John Norton UDGMENT Vs J M Carrie Norton This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before his Honor, H, P. Lane, Judge Presiding, and a Jury; and the jury having answered the issues as follows, to-wit; "1, pia the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer? Yes. 2 Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and avert for more than five successive years prior to the commence-~ ment of this action as alleged in the complaint; and was said separation without fault of the plaintiff as alleged in the com- plai nt? Answer, Yes. 3 Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the ? we commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer tt Yes. It is therefore considered, adjudged, and decreed by the Gourt that the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plain- ttff an@ defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved. Henry P Lane Judge Presiding. re Nois6 Noeth Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County November Term 1925 Stearns Brothers Inc vs ISSUES wR Hart & A C Hart l. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff, so, in what amount? Yes, The principal and interest less credits, $1898.73 with interest at 6% from Dec 8, 1924. NOVEMBER TERM 1925 MONDAY NOVEMBER 16 1925 2. Are the plaintiff the owner and entitled to the possession of the personal property described in the complaint? Answer > Se Yes, What was the value of said personal property at the time it was repleved by the defendants? Answer; $4000. 4. What amount, if anv, are the defendants entitled to recover¥ on their counter-claim? Answer ff North Carolina, j In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } November Term, 1925. No 186 Stearns Bros. Inc. $ vs § JUDGMENT, W. R. Hart and A.C. Hart 0) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell Countybefore his Honor, Henry P, Lane, Judge Presiding and a jury and it appearing to the Court that this is a claim and deliveryproceeding founded on note and chattel mortgage, and that the prperty described in the complaint filed in this cause was seized by the Sheriff of Durham County under said writ of Claim and delivery, and that the same was delivered back to the defend- ants by said Sheriff, said defendants having executed a replevy bond in the sum of $10,000.00 with John 8S. Neill and C. E. Neill as sureties. and that the defndants failed to prosecute their counter claim filed in thé@s cause, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court as follows, to-wit: "1. Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? Answer. Yes $1898.73 with interest at 6% from Dec.8, 1986 2. Is the plaintiff the owner and entitled to the possession of the personal property described in the complaint? Answ@r- Yes. 3. What was the value of the said personay property at the time a it was repleved by the defenfants? Answer- $4,000.00 Zt is therefore ordered considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, Stearns Bros.Inc., recover of the defendants, WR Hart and A. C. Hart, and their sureties, John 8. Neill and C.E. Neill, the sum of One Thousand Kight Hundred Ninty Eight and 73/100 ($1898.73) Dollaps together with interest thereon from the 8th day of December, 1924 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and it is further ordered and Court that the said defendants deliver said personal pr adjudged by the perty to the said plaintiff, the Sheriff of the County where #k&@ property is situated command! and that execution issue from this Court | NOVEMBER TERM, 1925 Monday November 16, 1925. to seize seid property and deliver it to said plaintiff, who is autor- {zed and directed to sell the same under terms and conditions of this chattell mortgage, and pay the purchase price of same on the above judément . ment judgment and costs of this action, the surplus or the balance due on said judgment and costs to be paid by said defendabts and their sure- ties above named. It is lastly ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendants! counter claim set up and filed in this cause be, and the same is hereby dismissed. Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding. Staerns Bros. Inc. V8 w. R. Hart and A.C. Hart. In this case ib is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendants! Counter claim set up and filed in this cause be, and the same is hereby dismissed. The Court is informed of the death of Mrs. W. D. Turner wife of Hon. W. D. Turner member of the bar and presidfent of the 2 local Bar Association, and the Court nowg adjurns in honor of Mra. Turner. Tudge Presiding and holding Courts for the 15th Judicial District. North Carotina, | In the Superior Court, Tredell County. 6 Before the Clerk. p.P. Dulin and Rachel King, Admps. of R.T. Weatherman, and H.E. Lewis. vs JUDGMENT, A. F. Hoke and Mittie Hoke. This cause coming on the be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court on Monday the 16th day of November, 1925 and it appearing to the Court that surmons in this action was issued on the lst day of October, 1925, and served on the lst day of October, 1925 by reading and delivering copy of the summons and copy of complaint to each of the defendants; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of 4300.00, together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 2lst day of November, 1923, until paid; and that said amount is a certain fixed amount; and it further appearing to the court that the defendants have not filed an answer within the time allowed by law: It is therefore orderedxand adjudged that the plaintiffs recover from the defendants the sum of $300.00, together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 2ist day of Nov- ember, 1923, until paid, and that the costs of this action be texed against said defendants. This the 16th day of November, 1925. J. A. Habtness, C S * Ge QQLGIQHITRIIGIZZOGLW QQ XG@C@OQLACG@ North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. }§ Before the Clerk. J. E. Hendren vs JUDGMEN T. D. E. Smoak, W.A. Fender and Clem Wrenn e This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before th undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County om Monday, the 16th dag of November, 1925, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 10th day of October, 1925 and that same was served on the 16th day of October 1925, by reading summons and delivering copy of same and cppy of complaint to Clerm Wrenn and D. E. Smoak; and it appearing further that W. A. Fender has not been served; it appearing further to the Court that duly verified complaint was filed in said cause on the 10th day of October 1925,; amd it further appearing to the court that the defandants, Clem Wrenn and D. EK. Smoak are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $500.00, together with in- terest thereon from abethe rate of six per cent per annum from the 3rd day of July, 1924, until paid; and that s&id amount is a certain fixed amount as shown by the note, a copy of which is set up in the complaint and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants, Clem Wrenn and D. E . Smoak, have not filed an answer within the time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover from the defendants , Clem Wrenn and D E Smoak, the sum of $500.00 with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent from the 3rd day of July 1924, until paid, and that the costs of this action be texed against said defendants. This November 16th, 1925. J. A. Hartness G; me Gs QO EQQIVC@QEZA@ North Carolina, § In the Superior Court q Igedell County. | Before the Clerk. Farmers Warehouse and Oil Mills, inc. VS JUDGMENT. J. Sam Archér This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing that all matters in controversey have been settled out of Court. It is therefore ordred and adjudged that this action be dismissed and the cost be taxed against the plaintiff. This cause be- ing heard before J. A. Hartness, c.S.C. This November 20, 1925. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. x 4 dell County. } Before the Clerk. Irede ° Ve First National Bank of M@oresville, N.Ceo vs IU Da3 2 2 ts Ss. R. Brown et al This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court and being heard and it appearing that a verified complaint was filed on September 10, 1925 and it appearing that summons was served on S. R. Brown on September 11, 1925 and it further appearing that no answer has been filed. It is therefore ordred and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of S. RK. Brown the sum of $729.75 principal, sum with interest on ‘350,00 from November 9, 1922 and interest on $ 379.75 from September 28, 1922 and the cost of this action. Judgment was rendered against N. D. Tomlin and Mrs. R. V. Brawley, Admrx of R. V. Brawley, deceased in this same case on Monday October 5, 1925. This Monday November 23, 1925. J. A. Hartness Glerk Superior Court. @oeneare wee c eet) Q2%22@@2CG@@B North Carolina,9 § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. W. W. Carter H.C. Hunter, John L. Milholland and W. R. Holland vs } JUDGES ts | 4 4 This cause coming on to be heard. and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, November 23rd 1925, and it appearing to thw Court that summons dnsthis action was issued on the 3rd day of November, 1925, and served on the 15th day of November 1925, by reading the summons and delivering copy of same and ear- copy of the complaint to each of the defendants; and it further app? defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $600.00, terest at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 21st, sad til paid; and that said amount is a certain fixed amount; ane oF . appearing to the court that defendants have not filed an Nee an & time allowed by law: : It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff re- cover from the defendants the sum of $600.00 together with interest at the rate of six per cent perannum from the 2lst day of January 1922, until paid and that the costs of this action be taxeddakginst said defendants. This November 23rd 1925. e Je A. Hartnegs CQ GORQALAGAHI® @@2@@@@QGQ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 Before the Clerk. John H. Thompson vs ¢UDGOMN RN? H. R. Cowles This cause coming on to be heard and beimg heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, November 23rd 1925, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 10th dag of January, 1925, and was served on the de- fendant on the 10th day of January 1925, by personal service, and that duly verified complaint was filed on October 30th 1925; and that defend- is indebtedto the plainbiff in the sum of $240.00 with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 18th day of March, 1919, until paid, and that said sum is due on a note, and it appearing further that the defendant has faited and neglected to answer or demur in this cause: a It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover from the defendant the sum of $240.00 with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 18th day of March, 1929, until paid, and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 23nd day of November, 1925. J A Hartness Clerk Superior Court. 1 County. $ Before the Clerk. Tredel Oounvy « First National Bank of M@oresville, N.Ce vs JvUvDGMNEA TT Ss. R. Brown et al This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court and being heard and it appearing that a verified complaint was filed on September 10, 1925 and it appearing that summons served on S. R. Brown on September 11, 1925 and it further appearing was 2 > o te that no answer has been filed. It is thepefore ordred and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of S. R. Brown the sum of $729.75 principal, sum with interest on S350,00 from November 9, 1922 and interest on $ 379.75 from September 28, 1922 and the cost of this action. Judgment was rendered against N. D. TomBin and Mrs. R. V. Brawley, Admrx of R. V. Brawley, deceased in this same case on Monday October 5, 1925. This Monday November 23, 1925. J. A. Hartness Glierk Superior Court. (QAI YIP ALIA YA ADD QYAIDALIBG@@ North Carolina,9 } In the Superior Court, { Iredell County. {| Before the Clerk. W. W. Carter vs JUDGMENT H.C. Hunter, John L. Milholland and W. R. Holland } 4 } i : ’ This cause coming on to be heerd.and being heard pefore the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, November 23rd 1925, and it appearing to the Court that summons dnsthis action was issued on the 3rd day of November, 1925, and served on the 15th day of November 1925, by reading the summons and delivering copy of same and copy of the complaint to each of the defendants; and it further ae ing to the Court that duly verified complaint was filedin said ca ’ the 5th day of Novembef 1925; and further appearing to the court eed defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $600.00, with io terest at the rate of six per cent per annum from January 2ist, 10m. til paid; and that said amount is a certain fixed amount; and 4% 1% appearing to the court that defendants have not filed no : time allowed by law: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover from the defendants the sum of $600.00 together with interest at the rate of six per cent perannum from the 2lst day of January 1922, until paid and that the costs of this action be taxed(aksinst said defendanss. This November 23rd 1925. 4 Js Ae Hartnegs QQ! LGYDGAD IA XQ QA HLOAAYAI@ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 Before the Clerk. John H. Thompson vs JUDGMENT. H. R. Cowles This cause coming on to be heard and beimg heard before the undersigned Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County on Monday, November 23rd 1925, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 10th day of January, 1925, and was served on the de- fendant on the 10th day of January 1925, by personal service, and that duly verified complaint was filed on October 30th 1925; and that defend- is indebtedto the plainbiff in the sum of $240.00 with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 18th day of March, 1919, until paid, and that said sum is due on a note, and it appearing further that the defendant has fal#éd and neglected to answer or demur in this cause: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover from the defendant the sum of $240.00 with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 18th day of March, 1929, until paid, and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 238d day of November, 1925. J A Hartnes Cierk Superior Court. ae ee ccna eee os ' North Garolina, ' In the Superior Gourt, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. — = John W. Spoolman § vs § JUD@OMENT, Iredell Upholstered Furniture Co,§ This cause coming on to be heard before the Court and it appearing to the Court, from the admission of the parties to this action, that the plain- = tiff and defendant compromised and settled all Claims and demands on the part ee eee eRe eR ron Ap of the plaintiff against the defendant growing out of the alleged cause of action set out in the plaintiff's complaint and that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the amount agreed upon; and the Plaintiff having come into court by and through his attorney of record, Buren Jurney, and requested per- mission to take a voluntary non-suit;: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that this action be dismissed and judgment of non-suit entered. It is further ordered that the defendant pay SE a ; the costs of this action, in the amount o f $8.00 Ss This the 7th day of December, 1925, 1 Je A. Hartness erk Superior Court. By Consent: Buren Jurney Attorney for plaintirr John A Scott Attorney for defendant, QLVDXALIIH QW AAPA IAD OI YVOAVIOAXA YADA North Oardlaina, 4 In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk. Nachman Spring-Filled Co. 4 vs \§ JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT. Iredell Upholstered Furm. Co. 4 THis cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, and it ‘Ppearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have settled _ ditterences in full and that the defendant. hes paid to the “7 ¥ amount due it ; a % 7 It is threupon, by consent of the plaintiff, ordered, considered 4 and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed and judge) ment of non-suit entered, And it further appearing that the defendant has paid the costs, it is ordéred and adjudged that it go hence without day. December 7, 1925. J. A. Martness Clerk Superior Gpurt. By Consent: Grier and Grier Attorneys for plaintiff John A. Scott es Attorney for defendant, VAIDYA: .QYCO@ODGAAUD GUKDUGAVOIAQDAYD® North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, Q Iredell Counby. 4§ Before the Clerk, Tredell Upholstered Furniture Co. vs JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUIRY. MP Critcher, andIndividual Doing Business under the name and Style of the Crither Hotel, Boone, N.C, This eause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court from the record in this case, that summons was personally served upon the defende antoén the lst day of October, 1925, and a verified copy of the complaint served therewith on said date; and it appearing fubther to the Court that this is an action brought by the Plaintiff to recover of the dafiendantvthe haccount for f00ds sold and delivered by the tiff to the defendant, which sum of $557.00 upon spen plain- Sum bears interest from Aug, 9th, 1925, until paid at six per cent and it appearing further to the twenty days determination of the jury; It is therefore, ghtitiea to recover of the ordred and decreeq that the plaintiff is defendant in thig action and that the plaintifr _ toa have judgment by default and inquiry against the defendant, and it appear- ing that the account upon which this suit is brought is an open account, It is further orddpred that an issue be submitted to the jury to de- termine the amount of said recovery, It is further ordered that the defandant pay the costs of this action. This the 50th day of November, 1925, J. A. Hartness Superior Court Iredell County. O2QQ BOQ DAVARI YYOAY@ North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk, L. D. Cook vs J U D G M Wi N TT. B. R. Towell This cause coming on to be heard before Shea. Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court and being heard and it appearing that summons was issued in the abive case on November 18, 1925 and verified complaint was filed on November 18, 1925, it further appearing that the suit is brought on a promissory notes and it further appearing that no answer has been filed, the summons having been served’on the day of November, 1925, It is therefore ordeped and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $500.00 with interest from December 27y 1924 at the rate of six per cent per annum and the cost of this action. This Monday December 14, 1925, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superipr Court . QCA GARY HA AK CVVA Y GIB ae a Mees - Nee oi ie ucts Co. Account 1.56 nt ae gs ge Comp. settlement Acct. 32.50 ’ Da J. A. Davidson Note 46.70 i W. R. Mills Bight Autos 779.85 Iredell County. 4 i - 3. Patterson Comp. Settlement Acct. 125.00 John Young Note 400.00 F. 8. Morrison Sale of Insolvent accounts copy of which ’ is hereto attached 6.00 North Carolina, eon i ei P, P, Dulin, Receiver of The Royal Motor Company, hereby makes thiy 4G his final account of said estate showing all receipts and disbursements as follon,; Total Receipts, $4,212.50 RECEIPTS. DISBUREMENTS. R. L. Reavis Machinery and supplfes e90+00 oe 50 J. P, Flanningan File case 4.00 Stamps, tags and twine =a Kyles Torch —— aby 4136 Carolina Motor Co. mae pin i o. Marsh for selling a@ding Machine 10.00 se “— 1.85 Statesville Battery Co. 3 Mos. Rent 208.68 zeae Deteenee " *30 Scott Charnley & Co. Auditing 250.00 Johm M. eretin Q a 8.45 C, Watkins, account as Temporary Rec. 38.00 Soptia Sk Gace Suprdilies 9.85 Fox Millsaps Motos th Repair work oo R. L. Reavis 10.30 dee tte dete eee Co. Ins & Bond 159.07 Morrison Lumber Co, Account 8.75 Serta Brae. Seta o. Ins on oe tt an . e e ~ oe " an woatipeda & Thompson Atty fee 215.00 i: i, Rene Suppiles 16.80 Iredell County Tax. $4.10 Bailey ae 3.90 City o@f Statesville idl i= ace : Thompson ” 1.90 J. A. Hartness, C.S.C. ™ -60 - P, Henkel Account 5.50 Carolina Motor Co. Supviles 29.30 John Young ' °75 J. R. Starrett ee 15.00 an ES aL Dividend of 15.5% to be paid as follows: Air Reduction Sale Co, 84 N. D. Starrett af 13.00 D. L. Warren C. D. Bailey J. M. Arey Carolina Motor Co, Central Cafe J. A. Eidson C. D. Bailey Holland Bros, Cemtral Cafe C. D. Bailey Re - Anderson H. Tomlinson L. Tompson W. Hager W. R. Mills Central Cafe Cash Sale Auction Sale R. M. Anderson W. Re. Mills L. A. Thompson Cash Sale B. L. Jones B. L. Phifer John M McElwee Ross Mills Auction Sale " " Note Supviles Hickory, N.C, Carolina Motor GO, Supplies Casing Fann Pulley Account Brush Payment off Automobite Motor Starter Pubelies Spring Anvil Starr Phonograph Supplies Payment on Automobile tia wt Supplies estate account Show case Desk Bumper and lights Leonard Piano Store Account R. M. Anderson Sale of Supplies R. M. Anderson F. C. Hubbard W. M. Lundy Paymeng on Auto Payment on Auto Account Bal. on Subscription Iredell Ice & Fuel Co. Account J. P. Flanningan R. Reavis L. Caldwell J. Flanningan R. Anderson A. Crouch Cash Sale W. W. Holland J. L. Holland n * " Gas and 011 tanks Machinery Shafting Clock Payment Supplies on Auto,4 Burning in Stana Account 2.00 7.20 44.22 20.00 50.00 12.50 3.00 1.53 66.65 25 00 225 101.00 145.00 1.95 5.00 6.00 25.00 86.00 304.70 50.00 200.00 5255 American Arts Works American Mills Co, Brunswick Balk Calder Co, Bassick Alémite Co. W. M. Barringer T. N. Brown Chamber of Commerce City of Statesville, Light acct. Doll & Smith Elyea Co. C. H. Turner Goodyéar T. & R. Co. R. M. Heblingshead Co. Interstate Motor Equipment Interstate Motor Co, Iredell Telephone Co, Komo Supply Co, Eugene Morrison Sr, W. Re Mills sr. PF. 8. Morrison Newton Ice and Fuel Co. Piedmont Hardware Co, Pyramid Ignition Postal Tel, Co. Mills Electric Co, Reflex Ignition Co. Red Devil 041 Co. Simons Manufacturing Co. Standard 011 Co. 0. W. Slain Glass Co, Statesville Oil Co. Statesville Motor Co Statesville Printing Co. Thomas Hardware Co, WU, Telegraph Co, Carolina Auto Supply House rk e Gulf Refining Co, seer less Mfg. Corporation, outhern Chemical Products Co. 10.12 70 9.64 a7 10 36 1.93 40.95 19.34 9.350 076 105.59 13.31 4.68 95 5.00 13.31 17.53 60.06 9.66 8.25 9.02 1.47 Garritt Electric Co. see Burroughs Adding Machine Co. In full ae Eugene Morrison Jr. can Shuford National Bank scares Commercial National Bank : Total $3818.55 $4212.90. ies —en "3703.55 ee Total , $4,214.36 Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 2lst day of April,1925 PP. Fe: Doe Receiver. C. G. Smith Deputy Clerk Superior Court North Carolina, } 4 Iredell County. } In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, Snow Lumber Company vs a JUDGMEND®, W. B. York and F W York, partners trading and doing business under the firm name and style of WB York and Son, ~~ This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action for breach of an express contract tp pay abso- lutely the sum of $1490.00 tue by stated account and balance struck for lumber sold and delivered defendants, and that under the terms of sale said gum of $1490.00 became due and payable on the 7th day of May, 1925; and it Swpiher together with copy of the complaint was personally named defendants, appearing that the summons served on each of the above and that said complaint duly verified was filed in this office on the date of issuing said summons, toew!t ’ on Nowember 350th 1925; and it further appearing that more than twenty days has elapsed and expired since the service of said Summons and copy complaint on each of the defendants, and that the defendants and each of them have fail- ed to answer said complaint within the t ime allowed by law; A t is therefore, considred, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of ONE THOUSAND FoUR HUNDRED and. NINTY ($1,490.00) DOLLABS, with interest thereon from May 7th, 1925, at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk og this Court, This December 21, 1925, ‘ J. A. Hartness Clerk Superfor Court Iredell County. PB ost ese tese tt sete tect eee pce TOE ete ete tt ee ees Fr beet eet North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredel] County. § Before the Clerk, J. K. Morrison Grocery and Produce Co. Inc. vs JUDGMENT, W. A. Howard This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Superior Coubt and it appearing the difference has been settled by the parties it is hereby ordered that the same be dismissed and plaintiff be taxed with the cost, which has been paid. This Jan. 4, 1926. J. A. Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court, Wiebe bette testi te eieest esheets North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, } Iredell County. 4( Before the Clerk. Cherry-Bassett-Winner Co. v8 CONSENT JUDGMENT. W. E. Selby, trading under the name@ and Style of Selby Ice ¢ Cream Co, This cause comibg on to be heard, and it appearing to the Court that all matters in controversy in this action and all accounts and claims of.everey nature existing between the plaintiff and defendant have been com- Promised and adjudged between the parties by the payment to the plaintiff >y. the defendant of the sum of one Hundred and Fifty-eight Dollars, ($158.00) which payment is hereby acknowledged by the plaintiff, by And it is therefore, ordered and adjudged by consent, that the 3 tiff take nothing more by this action and that the defendant go without day, It is further ordered and adjudged, by consent, that the plaintige pay the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This the 3lst day of December, 1925, J. A. Hartness Clerk Suoerior Court, By Consent: John A. Scott Attorney for Plaintié@f. EB. Mi. Land epee Attorney for Defendant. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk, Mrs. D J Williams, vs JUDGMENT, R CG Querry, J M Querry, J P Hendren and S G Sloan. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the defendants in this action were properly bgBought be- fore the Court by ebing served with Summons, by reading and leaving a copy of said summons with said defendants and each of them and by leaving a veri- — fied copy of the complaint with each of said defendants; And it further appearing to the Court that said summons was is- sued on the 25th day of June 1925 and returnable on the llth of July 1925; And it further appearing to the Court that more than twenty days have elapsed since said return date and that the derendants have not filed an answer to the complaint, nor demurred thereto; indebted to the plaintirr in the sum of three hundred dollars ($300.00) and interest threon at 6% form the 25rd day of July 192 5 until paid, to be com- puted payable every four months in advance rr 46 of the defendants the Sum of three hundred and thirty- sixty-four cents ($337.64) ana interest from this the furkhax cost in this action, This This the seven dohlars and date untsl1 paid and for : being the first Monday in August. Srd day of August 1925, ——i 4 Hertnese Sete ten a North Carobina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § Before the Clerk, Harmony Banking and Trust Co. vs JUDGMENT, R A Jones, and Lula Jones, F B Gaither and O G Sills, This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the defendants in this action and each of them were duly summons and brought into Court byv reading of the summons and the delivertng of a copy of the same to the said defendants and each of them, and by the delivering to each of said defendants a verified copy of the complaint; It further appearing to the Court that more than twenty davs have elapsed since the retubn day and that the defendants have failed to file an answer to the complaint or a demurrer threto; And it further appearing to the Court from the complaint filed in this action that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2129.00 with interest thereon from the 12th day of October 1925 until paid; And it further appearing to the Court from a supplmental complaint filed in this cause that the defendants R A Jones and wife lula Jones paid to the plaintiff on said indebtedness on the Srd day of November 1925, the wun of $1017.55; And it appearing further to the VYourt that after this payment the amount due the plaintiffs $1119.02 with interest thereon from the 3rd of November 1925 until paid, It is therefore ordered, decreed and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff recover ofthe defendants the sum of $1119.02 with interest thereon from the 3rd day ofNovember 1925 until paid and for the cost of this action. This being the third Monday, In Nov. This the 16th day ofNovember 1925 J A Hartness C S C, State cf North Carolina Department of Archives and History Raleigh CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY This is to certify that the microphotographs appearing on this reel are true and accurate reproductions of the records listed on the target (title) sheet preceding each volume or series of records microfilmed hereon; that the records were microfilmed on the date and at the reduc- tion ratio indicated; and that on the date ot microfilming, the records were in the custody of the official or other individual listed on the target sheet(s). It is further certified that the records listed on the aforesaid target sheet(s) were microfilmed in conformity with the provisions of Sections 8=-45.1 - 8-45.4, General Statutes of North Carolina; and that in order to insure archival quality and authentic reproduction of records filmed, they were microfilmed in the manner prescribed,and with equipment and film approved, by the State Department of Archives and History. —— & — (Signed) | y ) Camera Operator KND OF BOOK