The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1922-1923 In the, Superior Court, Before the Clerk, August 8th., 1921, North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk, I,A,Ballentine § Vis 7,Q, Warren This cause coming on to be heard before J.A.4artness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, on Monday August 8th., 1921, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court the evidence produced that this is an action on a note, and that the in this action more than ten days prior to the first 1921, and that a verified complaint was filed in this issuing of the summons, and that a copy of the served on the defendant at the time of serving the summons, the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $262.20 interest on same from the lst day of February, 1921, until at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that the defendant has file an answer on or before the second Monday in August, same * Sth day of August, 1921; It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the recover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred Sixty two and $262.20) Dollars, with interest on Same, at the rate of six per cent per annum, from the lst day of February 1921, until paid, and the costs of this action to be paid by the defendant as taxed by this Court, This August Sth., 1921, J.A,“artness Clerk Superior Court. IRONS IALETIOIIVGTIAD In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, January 9th,, 1922, North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County, } Before the Clerk, R,T.Weatherman | @VSw H,O. Thompson { before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on this the 8th day of January, 1922, seme being t} nd M ay ala month, and it appearing to the Court that sumnons his action wa : dq ne 20th day of December, 1921, and that a verifiede in the office of the Clerk of the Sourt ther that the summons was served on the defendant, H.0.Thompson, and ¢ py > ti mplaint delivered to him on December 23rd., the summons was made returnable that the cause of actiom is it appearing further second Monday in January, by the compla adjudged: by the Court that the plaintiff recover of of $250.00 with tukuxr« interest thereon at pe 16 26th day « ust, 1920, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This the 9th J,A,Hartness C,5.0, of lredeil County, MONDAY, JANUARY 30t} ity JANUARY SOth., 1922, T 7 <r January Term, 1922, PYDOTIMTIIS DeDAR Tote EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT PAR LAMAN SL OF NORTH CAROLINA TI Ty TH OO ns wr a ‘aii 7E, The Hon, Walter E,Brock, assigned by law to hold the 1S, OW 220 Superior Court of the 20th Judicial District for Syringe Term, 1922 ” Wve Ils +0Lllg - YON?” and the Hon, we Bis Ray, Suverior Court of , Tr1 4 $01 Tr jan 8 Pe * - r 4 i i" he 15th Judicial District for said Spring Term, 1922, have agreed to UL exchange the Gourvs of the i fter in their said respective districts for sai NOW, THEREFORE AMER MORRISONZ Governor of the State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested inn r lew, do herehy consent to said exchange, and do hereby author he sé Hon, Walter E. Brock to hold the seid Courts of the Cou peginning ry 25rd,zg IREDELL, one week, beginning January the L5th Judicial District, in iteu Oo! id Hon, J,BIS SPRING TERM} 1922; and the hold the said Courts o ar rd, in the for said SPRING TERM, hereunto set my hand and caused the GREAT SEAL of the State to be affixed, this the 2lst day of Januery in the year of our Lord one ne hundred and twenty-two, and mn the one hundred and forty-sixth year our American Independence, CAMERON MORRISON |By the Governor: Wri, H. Richardson Private pecretary. wt m hile Cy Le MONDAY, JANUARY SOth’., 1922, January S0th,., North Carolina, No. 1 State NAV LIN QUOR @}i 2ARY TO LAW, { January Term, 1922, { Tredell Countye vs ; ; a | Robert Woodward Be it remembered that 4 Superior Court begun and held in and for County of Iredell, state of North Carolina, on the Sth Monday before |No. 2 , : pa tea State in March, 1922, the same being the 50th day of January, 1922] vs | L,H, Souther HONOR, Walter E, Brock, Judge Presiding, is present and Hayden Clement, Solicitor, is present and No. 9 aes State State, we Alias Capias,. Bill Barnhardt : of Tredell County, is present and following good and lawful men + 7 ¢ L,H. Bradshaw, wr Oc i.B,. Chambers, S. age ..W, Stevenson, E.Jd. i en we cae ee ee ee cee I.F Wiggins, W.P,Morton, waiver L.dacks, W.B,Vampbell, A‘ annoy ‘al ¢ ALEXA INGEL » Tee << ft ats, — ‘ ma [,Godfrey, R.C, Gill ~"” 7 er ry s Cc be tar ARTT men were Prawn & sworn as GRAND. vs : * John D, Farkey warreél C,+ee, Je F, Wiggins, ,otevenson, No.9 of the Grand Jury. | No, 10 State officer of the Grand Jj _ vs Boise Uonner Lawful men were sw P it Jurors for| A B.Lippard, W.A.McKnight, L,H, Bradshar No. 11 ; | State W.B.Chambers, as regular vs T,T.Smith eh Uae H,Rankin were excused on the account No, 12 State a or vs ful men were sworn 4s Talés jurors f a yp i ape Tal Sherrill he WwW } Ou 3 r a ha 4 ~ > a VI nh he week,to-wit: E.W.Estes, A,A,Neill, L.R,Smith, W.D. Pharr, \No. 13 | RETAIDONG LIQUOR. Nol Prosed With Leave. 14 State " i MFG, LIQUOR. Continued Under Fo N,A.®enegar rmer Order, No, 27 State vs J.D, Rogers No, 29 State 6. D.C, “arberry No, $1 State ~V8 geal Brown MONDAY, January 30th., 1922, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Continued Under Former Order, RRTAKING. LARCENY AND RECET' BREAKING, oARORNY AND RECEIVING, worry Tw FULLY. Instanta AIT) ADIT TRY ANY ALVULIN1L, Leave. CPDARMTNA TTC IRTING LLQUON Alias Capias. h JsA24 , C NY AND RECEIVING, Continued under Former Order, to Nov. Term, 1922. TRANSPORTING LIQUOR. Alias Capiase HAVING LIQUOR FOR SALE. Alias Capias. No. 32 State | vs | Roscoe Holman | No, 35 | State vs | wall H, Souther No, 54 State vs Len Ingram Bud Ingram Mence Bost Rogers Ernest Valton No. 44 State vs Fale Golden George Brown Tom Henderson No, 37 | State vs |'Banks Hoard MONDAY, January 30th., 19227 “7 AUTOR NAV LIN Sea ce aa ne AR MEG, LiQuOh, mm & 2 a le Continued, oO i beam Continued un ARSON, Nol Pros With Leave. UNLAWFULLY RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING LIQUOR, Defendant enters © plea of guilty of Receiving and Transporting liquor. In count 3 of receiving liquor, it is ordered aged by the C urt that the defendant Banks ane tae tine of $850.00 and cost of this action. In the count No, 5 in bill of indictment for Pransporting Liquor, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that on apphication of the High Sneriff or itor that the defendant be confined in the common ¢ Iredell County for ® term of SIX (6) MONTHS, assigned the Public Roeds of said county for gaid period. Capias to issue on application of the High Sheriff or the Solicitor for the State. a+ State vs _ T,C,¥arson poet MC RN ES A EE A OE PT Ko OM De a MONDAY, January 50th., 1922, Defendant enters a plea of guilty of Resisting and officer. Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that| qudgmerit pensuspended upon payment of cost in this action 4 OmTrN ALT Om tp A NTT A 7, TY Ww RESISTING AND OFFICER AND AWD. Q | | j | ROVNY Defendant en plea of guilty of Forceable Trespass which plea t the Solicitor for the State, | Tt is orderec md adjudged by the Court that the Yefendant pay the cost of this action, It is further 1 anc fudged by the Court oh: recommendation of | } State that the defendant be confined | f Iredell County for a term of SIX | work on the Public Roads application of the issue at any time Solicitor, b Li 2. ate ¢ common st. oP - ™ c i) ya) Bach o1 ch ear red Larceny the bill Receiving. brats enters : Eo aoe indictment re MaAADTT UY IDA DARN Be! Ald Just WIAD VIN » nters a plea of guilty 4s charged in pill. ordered and adjudged by the Court upon idation of Solicitor that prayer for judgment bé upon payment of the cost in this ation. Sr T NM YING CONCEALED WEAPON. 1 nters a plea of guilty of Carrying 6 conta ieapon, It 18 ordered wnd adjudged by the Court, ies judgement be suspended upon payment of cost of this ae OBTAINING GOOD ‘UNDER FALSE PRETENSE, wal Defendant enters a plea of guilty of Forceable ee which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the Staves It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that a judement suspended as tothe Yefendent and that : Sst prosecuting witness 3.C.*+empleton pay the cost o action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. No, 25 State vs Joe Eccles l.No. 42 State vs Bob Wilson No. 535 a+ he Stave va - Duke Pavidson This Hono January Sist., 192 . ae . nm * + rable vLourt MONDAY, January 30th., 1922, \ Aw HW fie the oe tte | Deft, called and { Aart te, Calltf <i Orcutt Juced dafres ADAMI ART Li% B PNLVODTU ad eee ada o! rN . are AML ABUIGLV LIN, Deft, enters a plea of noy guilty, Jury No. 1 after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they fine the defendant guilty of Larceny and Receiving as charged in bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued for Three years upon paymeny of the cost in this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, aavan epaarrwa Taney oD BEoeTeree m. DFE LANL ) RECLLVLNG, Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No. © after being fic duly sw and empannelled for their verdict. May aw Ja 2 9°22 over to Tuesdey Jan, Slst., 1922, SLORE DHA ILNU, lay morning, 2, at @:50 o'clock Tuesday, January Sist., 1922, Seadli’ tas 4 rf, January 3] | Noe 59 Tis Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, Tuesday | | State DISPOSING OF VLOrOoLNG IMA ART! DDAT - R PROT ry vs . Defendant apitel dnd C0004. 3 3 + ow a F — es a 9 : . si — AUS - and Talled Judgment Nisi Sci *a rary Slst., 19&<, for the dispatch of business, A,T, “ager and Capias, stanta Sef Pa and Cavias; 5 CALA STORE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, ee MANUFACTURING Continued over from Monday, Jan, SOth., 1922, Jury No,2! er RARE AY SELES after being dyly sworn and empannelled for their verdict Henry McDaniels and hearing the evidence say they find the defendant | rred Shoemaker cuilty of Store Breaking, Larceny and Receiving as charged in the bill of indictment, Tt is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court) No. 49 that the defendant Duke Davidson be confined in the ‘State common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO (2) vs YEARS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of Arthur Gaither seid county for said period with felon stripes, ( t+ Sanesr nA Continued, pt A pect A a RE A pe HE No, 55 State CURSING ON PUBLI6 HIGHWAY vs enters a plea of guilty as Henry Shoemaker chareed in bill of indictment, Tt is orderec and Frank McCurdy adjudged by the Court thet judgment be suspended upon payment of cost in this action as to the defendant tlenn Morrow, Verdict not guilty as to Baxter Morrow Morrow, Tom Ostwalt, Fred Bradford, John Oey st * ae C+ + rant n< ‘liasrd Stewart, lfudged by the Court n C be confined 1 aga tt term or Ti the ) mwhitn anne UDLLS A.C . ~ + a lon stripes, red by the MeCurdy be confined ounty for a term of (189 mm the Public et pee a pa I EE felon ee ee Oe ee OE RE ee EE BHAVIOR (HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY 10 LAW) | 10; 87 and showed good behavior. 1 s ordered) ‘tate the Court that the defendant t discharged, v8 henry Shoemaker Frank McCurdy that the common \ mwmonrmic ij ara\Z7 Ad Le ? g 'VING WORTHLESS CHECKS, efendant enters a plea of guilty as charred in bill of indictment. t 4s ordered and adjudged by the Court that the ant pay a fine of &50,00 and cost of this a ’ that the defendant rank MeCurdy be confined in e common ja 0! redell unty ra term of SIX 3) MONTHS, © assigned > work on tne Public Roads f si felon stripes, at the sentence Tt is therefore, ¢ 1d nad adfudged by the WU Ae 4 - ’ .+ said county for 4 arm ~ el 4g further oraere< ie ESS CHECKS. = +anra 1) 5 <r oC 7 , a pill rt enters a plea of guilty as charges ” ms this case 18 to take sentence an No. o/s ts therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court hat the defendant be confined in the common jail of sedell County for a term of SIX (ge) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Publis roads of said county for | No. 25 said period, sentence to begin on application of Sherd | State of Tredell County or the Solicitor for thés district. Le. Capias to issue on application of the Sheriff of Tredell | Joe Kecles pet peat De A ES ee EE pee ae RE HO ~~ County or Solicitor of this district at any time within THREE YEARS’ and further that defendant pay the cost 0 F. ost this action, iState | VS No, 60 \Bli Privette State GIVING WORTHLESS CHECKS, : vs ne defendant enters a plea of guilty of Forgeable J,,Aliman Trespass which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State, ; Tt is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the on that prayer for judgment be continued upon paymeny N° the cost in this action, . + SELLING IQUOR, : : ring to the Court that the defendant Eli ocltgtte was setae out and judgment Absolute having peen issues for the amount of the bond, slit Pe . #1000,00, to be discharged upon the payment of § 50. and ftvfurther appeering that the $750,00chas been aid into Court. It is therefore, ordered ec ‘ apias is to issue to the Sneriff of Iredell oun its if the defendant be found oe 0nke ny seen within the year 1922, and n e” @ Sphere sted on said Vapieas in the year . is not orgs authorized to Nol Pros said case at the Januery Term, 1925. % Pet St ee ak ek pret te EE EE oe Tuesday, January Slst., 1922, JANYARY 3lst,, 1922 RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING LIQUOR, NORTH CAROLINA, The defendent enters a plea of guilty of Receiving ' SoDELL COUNTY. | ees and Transporting liquor, TREDELL COUNII, JANUARY tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the yr be confined in the common jail of Iredell county for | 7 ' a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work | on the Public Roads of said County for said period without felon stripes, It is further ordered by the Court that Capias in this case is to be issued on application of the Sheriff of Iredell County or the Solicitor at any time within THREE YEARS to execute | euPRRILL FRAZIER said sentence without any further order of the Court,| Se Tt is further ordered that deft. pay cost of this setton, 10, 62 5 ? A TE VS Ve j | VT -_ ++, 8 When tnis case a is acquittal in the Recorders! Capias to Montgomery County, j Commissioners of Iredell! aan Te said defendant is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment, lute be entered-against Ernest Dalton, defendant Court on OLU a surety RH. Kennedy for the sum of $50,00, s+ a) 4 nis ¢ counsel and Hayd having agreed upon udged py the Court that Judgment | ni rt upon the ’ bh 9 e this Court upon t upon payment of tne cost o peing of the opinior of Iredell County is TADAGT Defendant called d faile Judgment and Can’ anda Lap 5 had no jurisdiction ac AD o of the defendant, it . 8 4s 3 + r a ae ae ae Ne ne ia 1 rt wk Therefore, ordered and adjudged wnat wie wees ecorders' Court aratn AT BADIM A — DURtTty SING OF MORTGAGE PROPERT: 7 saan eame 4g nereby declared to be unconstitutional Se ae ore of Iredell County be and the ~** sreby declared to DK ve a Defendant enters a plea of guilty as cherged in bill | of indictment, t is orered and adjudged by the Tt i - A‘ . f Court that prayer for judgment be continued to May 5. +. tute Court, and thet 7 bar 4 4 7 said x ~ 3 Aafiandal 44 4 1 in tals vourv a 1 na Term, 1922, and that the ee 77s ae pe paid by said | defendant cannot aveil s nae ao een ° T ovittal raised by the void and of no effect; ULtt 8 y and further required nd in sum of $200. appearance at said term. : sale | the same is therefore Tt is furthered ordered by the Court that rucgaey Walter E. Brock ; or 0 t of 8 fs a Walter E, Broc: ute be discharsed on payment of cost of Sci *4&- NS SST AINE No, 30 State RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING LIQUOR. vs It is ordered and adjudged by the Court under the se naneas until Wednesday morning, M. J. Jurney former order that prayer for judgment pe further Tis Honorable Court panes 6 THO . : continued for Three (3) Years upon the defendant s 0 o'clock, A. paying the cost at this term of court, and farther | February 1st., 192%, at 9:50 0 ome eee with the right of the Solicitor within the said TH —> = /) YEARS to pray the Judgment. A oo bs i aha aiid uli i sii bi Z JUGZe residing. WEDNESDAY, February lst., 1922, Mis Honorable Court Convened Wednesday morning, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. February lst., 1922, for the dispatch of business, JUDGE W.E. BROCK, JUDGE PRESIDING: Wie the Grand Jury for the January Term of Iredell Superior Court 1922, beg leave to submit the following report: Wie have passed on all bills send us by the Solicitor and made return of same to the Courte | Wie visited the County Road Camp and found 14 white prisoners, 16 colored, The prisoners report to us that they are well cared for, and nty to eat sipep comfortably warm, We suggest that thé bedding be QQ oA kept in a more Ss nitary condition, We recommend also that the mTAaneA Wasnee. prisoners have a better table and seats to eat at. Also a cover over the We found 18 mules that | table and benches, so as to be ary while eating. was in good condition and looked as if they had good treatment, Wie visited by committee the County Home and found 47 inmates, 15 | white males, 14 white females, 1 white boy, 2 white girls; 6 colored males, | 4 = colored women, colored prisoners, 1 white prisoner, We found every V thing in good condition. We questioned the inmates and they told us they were well fed with good wholesome food and treated good by their keeper, We visited the County jail and found every thing in good sanitery condition. We found 4 white malex prisoners, © colored, 1 insane man, We recommend this man be sent to the Hospital at Morganton as early as possibly. We also recommend thet the walls in the toilet and also the stools be gone over and put in proper condition, Also we recommend a cover over the mattresses in the jail and more blankets are needed, We also ion as they are needed MMO recommend that the padded cells by put in good condit for insane people, A committee of our body invested the several offices of the Court house and found the records properly kept so far as we can SCC. We recommend that an assistant Janitor to help Mr. Cook so that he may keep every thing more comfortable and sanitary. We recommend that Seplium be put on Miss “enkel's room a Ss it will remedy the condition, Respectfully submitted, Jno, V.' Barger | No, 25 | J,R Elam, et al t vs j | weS. Dexter and \ Joe Dexter } | No, 17 A,G, Stewart { ~VS- } Thos, W. Springs } It was ordered by tne Court on reco! 1\dations of the Bar that Bll civileqases set-for Thursaay, eb, 2nd an riday, Feb, Srd., 1922, be \ continued over to Mondey, Feb, 6th., 1922, except the case Normandie Co, vS, Neal-Plott Grocery Co, and the one now on trial, Stewart vs. Springs. No, 80 | Nor G A 4-0 Tr the ne tor Court | North Carolina, In the Sv ’ ' Tanuinry Ter 199% | Iredell County. } anuary Term, 1922. I,C.Somers, { -VS- { JUDGHER T. | J,C,Gray { | j 1 4 1 ¥ . na Tanuary +err 1906 . Mis cause coming on to be near & the January term, 1922, of “a4 . S - Came T TANnaAY Yad sy B Br k | the Superior Court of Iredell County before His honor, lalter HE, bDrock, ; being a and it appearing to the Court that a | Judge Presiding, and being eard, and it ap! f | summons was issued in this action against the defendant J.C,Gray on the : 4 mea v 1 n Q a shy e t | 5th day of Novemberm 1921, and at the same time & warrant of attachmen | was issued |and warrant of 2 required by law; Foreman Grand Jury. This Honorable Court adjourns until 9:50 o'clock, February 2nd., 1922, A.M. Thurs dey the said warrant of having appeared and yb $391.00, belonging + This Honorable 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, for against the pr of the warrant of attachment 4 W, Bryan, Trustee, and R.T, Weatherman, requiring said garnishees to appear and answe affects of the said q.0,4ray + THURSDAY, FEBRUARY attachment ; answered that o the defendant, oper ty of the ttachment having been and it appearing fur ther Court conened Thursday morning, February 2nd., the dispatch of t sa sold vue duly served bj that notice of garnishment was Ss iy ney had in their Pp and the garnishee, he had in his poss J.C, Gray, 2nd,, 1922, rn Je Ues Executor of the will of L.N.Gray, sand seid summons . y publication as at the time of the issuing erved on George upon oath what property or ossession at the time of George W. Bryan, Trustee, 4 ession the sum of! and the garnishee, R, Ts THURSDAY, FEBRUARY @nd,, 1922, : FEBRUARY 2nd,, 1922, Weatherman, Executor of the will of L.N.Gray, having appeared and answered ; t thereof to pay the balan ks ee . that the defendant J,C, Gray would probably be entitled to a sum of money —" pay the balance due on this judgment that execution shall issue against the Eharman for ‘the enount in aie nee | under the will of the said L.N.Gray but that the amount due him can not be | | | and ascertained ne estate of the said L N, Gray has been fully settled so much thereof as may be necessary And it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff's cause! a } 1 -- Lut ao ,ODUer ! gael } ma adind a +7 PS ” she balance due him on 4 judgment rendered by the Supertor| C i and adjudged by the Court that the judgme herein rendered against J,C,CGray is a 1 a+) ane £s 4 County on the 26th dey of January, 1914 specific lien ’ : vv aes i oe | wpon the funds the hands of George i, Brya: gm, and due t said Jocketed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court ‘ee . & yé nd due the sala 5,0.Grea om the 8th day of November, 1921, and is her yr declareé } Docket Book 16, page 78, & } 1e balance due on ee : Ly and i6 nenehy coelerey o%. eat t 4} ’ ; a specific -upon the funds in the hands of R,T.Weatherman, Executor with interest thereon from the oth day of Novembey : : : a lof the Will of L.N.Gray, from the leth day of Novenber, 1921. appearing f “urther that the return date of the the 12th day of Vecember, 1921, and that before on the lst dag of December, 1921, the plaintiff laint and the defendar t having failed within the nswer raising an issue of fact: Honorable therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the February Srd., 192, tne ae laintiff, J,C,Somers, recover of the defendant, J me from the 5th day of November, action, | } i ad by the Court that the » of this Court | z.C.Gray, the same to | payment on this judgment A 4% is further ordered by the Court that | fails and refuses to psy in said eum | from rendition of this judgment that execution issue , c a ; a he property of the said ' se W, Bryan for said amount of $391.00 + interest fromthe date his judgment and the costs of the execution It is further ordered by the Covrt that when the amount due the J.C,Gray under the will of L.N,Gray shall be ascertained by the settle of the estate of the said L,N.Gray, that R eatherman, Executor, hall forthwith pay to the Clerk of the Court said amount, same to be applied as a payment on this judgment, It is further ordered by the Court that a copy of tnis judgment j G w OU " ir be served upon George W, Bryan, Trustee, and upon R,T.Weatherma, Executor of the Will of L.N.Gray/ And upon the failure of the said R, T, Weatherman to pay into the hands of the Clerk of this Court the amount due J.C. Greve | when the amount shall be ascertained as herein provided, oF s sufficient i | Friday, Fepruary 3rd., 1922, This Honorable Court convened Friday morning, February 3rd ‘9 1922, .at 9:50 o'clock, A.M, for the dispatch of business, No, 55 C.B.Stewart, Adm. of Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court thet Carl Stewart the vlaintiff may amend his complaint and shall VS heave 10 days after the adjournment of this Menufacturing Co. term of the Court to amend the same, The Deft shall have 30 days thereafter in which to : filed tts answer, Noe Ze Leathers , L& It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that VS this case be transferred to the trial docket No, 89 North Tredell 4 coming on to be heard, and peing heard before His Honor, ding, and it appearing to the Court that the judgment of a Justice of the Peace: ind adjudged by the Court that the said appeal be, an ischarced and the defendant is to pay the costs of this "7 Walter E. Brock Tudge Presiding. QQXQQ KBE QaXyay my WAYS AYO YOY DOD DDQDO QIJPPILB GGG ABB PDAIDDADI IAI No, 46 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Januery Term, 1922. Co. | f and S.H. Burns} | It appearing to the Court that the parties to this action na adjusted their differences: “eat ‘ It is adjudged that the action abate end that the costs be against plaintiff, Walter_E, Brock’ Judge Srestding. QGI2029IUN j | | | } } | j i | Bristol Hotel & Vas at the end of Friday's calendar, Feb, 10th,1922) | FRIDAY, February Srd,, 1922. me 1") 4 Ur IREDELL COUNTY. } JANUARY TERM, 1922. A, G STEWART SPRINGS wi ot * cause coming on to be heard at term of the Court, pefore His Honor, wW,2.Brock, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties have compromised involved in this litigation on the following terms, The defendan Oo pay » and the defendant to pay the defendar draw interest and execution this Court. nv ANA Y'T BY CONSENT’: ed ATT'YS Wilson Warlick and Long & Jurney ¢ A,G.“agum and H.P,Grier No.» 25 Cc vior rt North Caroline, Superior Court, J Term, 1922. Iredell County.| anuary Term, 1¥« 3.R, Blam and Dexter Legenby | vs { W.S.Deater and Joe Dexter. 1 ts indebted to the plaintiffs, if so, 1- Are the defendan 20th., 1919. how much tes §700,00 and anterest from Sept. °. pia the defendants obtain from the plaintiffs tne pudalent price of the truck mentioned in the come” by 78 representation as alleged to in compse ‘ Answer: YeS. le FRIDAY, FEBRUARY Srd., 1922. To, 56 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | Januery Term, 1922, Normandie Company, Plaintiff composed of Thomes A, Murry and Charles A,Andersony,y compesing said Company as partners a Neal-Plott Grocery Company , defendant ee et ee > pet OE ley co og q2 = bi r= 8 cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court Walter E. Brock, Judge and it appearing to the Court ntiff and defendants have composed nd adjusted their compromise, upon the terms agreed upon: therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff is kegs of soft drinks designed as KO now ‘in the that said goods are to be delivered at the N.C. by the defendant free of charge, that the plaintiff recover of the Hundred Dollars and the costs of the case to be Court, This judgment to be paid Walter E, Brock Judge Presiding. the Superior Court, .4 - m 2 January Term, 1922. NON-SUIT. coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court has failed to appear and prosecute his action. nerefore considered and adjudged by the Court that “he plaintiff | nd he is hereby non-suited, and that the costs of this action be taxed by the Clerk of tis Court against the plaintiff. Bis Ra fudge *residinge oO FRIDAY, FEBRUARY Srd,, 1922, No, 25 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | January Term, 1922, and Dexter Lazenby :. and Joe “exter. This cause coming on the be heard at this term of Court before) } | | | | | } j i “= 5. Prock, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having| 55 submitted to them in favor of the plaintiffs as set | rt is therefore, considered and adjudged that J,R,@lam and noy, recover of the defendants W.S.-exter and Joe Vexter, the Dollars, with tmterest from September 20th., 1919, this action to be taxed by the Clerk. adjudged that the debt upon which this judgment | | | 1e pleadings| and fraudulent representation sale of the Truck aforesaid, by th said defendants +7 \ Ty Walter E, Brock Tudge Presiding. Of NOe 25 rR Elam and Dexter Lazenby 4 } NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT oe Theidafenddnts through their Counsel makes motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial for errors commited in the trial and for errors appearing :incthé recofdocoymittedoby the-dourt assignedoand, tobe éeSignedi: Motion over-ruled by the Court. Vefendants excepts end appeals to the Supreme Court, Notice of appeal waived in open Court. By consen it is agreed that the defendentAshall heve 50 days from the adjournment of this Court in which to make and serve case on appeal and the plaintiffs to have 30 days thereafter to serve counter Case oP file exceptions. Apps bond in sum of $50,00 is adjudged sufficient. b Tis Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday morning » Reb 6th., 1922, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. MONDA North Carolina, | Tredell County. | This Honorabl | morning, February 6th., Y, FEBRUARY 6th., 1922, In the Superior Court, January Term, 1922, Second Week, e Court convened at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. Monday 1922, for the dispatch of business. His Honor, J, Bis Ray, Judge Presiding for t@ sth Judicial Distr wesP_ A sand tile +e Alexand e2 Carolina, returned into lawful men to serve | to-wit: H,M.Sherrill, J. J.W.Miils ’ W.B, ie! ‘ Alexender, rn Campbell, &.G.Goodin, No, 3 L. Sherrill vs B,M.Wilhelm No. 9 Statesville Lumber Co. 4 VS j C,H, Knox } No, 15 Mrs, S,1,Fespermen et al VS Merchants & *armers Bank of Mooresville No, 16 PitteBarnum & CO. VS I.k.Morrison Gro. & | Produce Co, |\No,. 34 \A,T,Rinehardt Admr, of |J,P,Rinehardt, aec'd VS Mooresville Cotton Mills Co. No, 15 W.E,Morrison, Jr. vs, W.W.Murdock, et al ounty, North the names of the following good end 4 second week of this term of Court, w's certificate certifying aon Continuec, Continued. Continued by consent, lied Plaintiff No, 1 being sworn and pannel ‘ : utting on apart of his evidence announce emat be sia rests Deft, makes flotion forinen-sult Motion sustained by the Court 4s recorded on another page of these minutes. Jury : R.L wing jurors to-wit R,A,Cloyd, a Tis Be nae, 7 sretohie, Jei. campbell, W.L.Keller, tS ysnerrill, Bno.C.Collins , J.W.ML118 » Ree ta ‘sworn and’ y ,L. Cook, and L.F.Seott, were Da fa Case continued over to Feb, 7th,1922. Seg saber a recess until Taesdey, February This Honorable Court Tth,, 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, Av Me 626 TUESDAY, PEBRUARY 7th., 1922, 627 TUESDAY, PEBRUARY This Honorable Court convened Tuesdey morning, at 9:50 o'clock ‘* : 9 . + 60 A.M, February 7th., 1922, for the dispatch of business, me *} North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, :: Iredell County, | Yenuary Term, 1922, No, 1 W.E, Morrison { The plaintiff heard apart of its evidence and VS | { rests, Deft, makes motion for non-sult, Motion | Kincaid Brothers | W.W.Murdock, et al } over-ruled by the Court, At this point the } Plaintiff and defendant gets together and -VSe ) JUDGNEN?, } effects a compromise as hereafter recorded, Meee. ee eRe SS { on another page of these minutes, | wen Clary 5 } ete > ci a . ; et ; wea ee : | This cause coming on for nearing at this term of Court before His Boyce Lumber Co, a fan r - R ae : . . ; ‘ VS { Continued for Plaintiff, Honor, J, Bis “ay, and it appearing to the Court that the parties of this J,H. Weston { action have compromised their differences: No, 82 ee Solas : It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the ‘tia Greer j SIVORCE, The following jurors, to-wit: Ryd VS } Cloyd, R.L. Alexander, J.H.Ketchie, J,H, plaintiff, Kincaid Bros, recover of the defendant W.M,Clary, the sum of U.S. Greer { Campbell, W.L,Keller, R.H. Brown, H.M.Sherrili, : ; | Jno. C.Collins, J.W,Mills, J.L,Lentz, RL, $500,00 with interest from Januery 3SOth,, 1922, until paid and for the { Cook and L.F,Scott, after being duly sworn and! {| empannelled for their verdict Sey they answer | costs of action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court arainst said Aare Q the issues as follows; ? { ist, Has the plaintiff been e resident | defendant, aes { of the State of North Carolina for the five § years next preceeding the bringing of this J, Bis Ray { action as alleged in the complaint 7 UAE | Answer; YES, { end, Did the nlaintif and defendant { intermarry as alleged in the complaint ? i { Answer: YES, f ord, Did the defendant commit adultry as | ) ‘alleged ? No. $ : i Pt 7 1 } ay ° Tr tha Ganarian lourt { Answer; YES, No¥th Carolina, |} In the Superior Court, January Term, 1922 Ifed611 County. | Se en ee N RD i North Carolina, | In the Superftor Court, ; B.M, Hayes { Iredell County, ] Januery Term, 1922, ‘ UDQHEN? OF NONeSUIT VS Seeeenninnicy euae” aaaens Samal” Etta Gree f Wiley Padgett | ~VS- SUDGMEN 2, : . - m and the plaintiff Lac? — os This cause coming on for hearing at this term and the plaintiff U.S, Greer pourra aria jornéys, Lewis & = a 1 £ Taintif throurch his attorney S LEWIS 4 failing to prosecute his suit, plaintiff through r . Te ai + ) ad idged i vef ; 4 Court and takes a non-suit, It is therefore adjudg nas cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before Lewis, comes into Court and takes i exed against the plaintiff by the Clerk Mia tain se gee ‘ ‘ : , ‘ } , he action be taxed against the 1 nis Honor, J, Bis Ray, Judge Presiding, and jury, and the jury having that the costs of the acti é answeréng the issues Submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and the of this Court, . J. Bis Rey following verdict found: Juage presiding, That the defendant, U.S.Greer, did commit adultry as alleged | S in the complaint: | No, 32 fox The following jurors, to-wit: 9.3, Sonne | Grady Hines and John Fo j.F,MeGraw, A,C,Jones, R,L.Alexander, J.H, wees diye ose C2 4mee fue ,.L,.Keller, R.H.Brown WHEREFORE S a 1 ¢ 4 he marriage -VS~ wv J,H,Campdell, W,L.Ke Mian testes f » 1% is considered ana adjudged that t Bitton & Bourbonnais Co. Ketchie, J,H,¢amp existing between the Plaintiff, Etta Greer, and the defendant, U.S.Greer, t lled for xxx - Seott, were sworn and empanyellec ; their vendiot in this action, "Uses eee over to Wednesday morning, Feb, 8th., 1 - be k | d } H,M,Sherrill, Jno,C,Collins, R.L.Cook an ' } ! end the same is hereby dissolved and the parties thereto divorced from the bonds of matrimony, ee J, Bis Ray Tadpe Présiding Fifteenth Judicial District, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday, at 9:30 O'clock, A.M. February 8th,, 1922, SATURDAY, February llth, 1922. No.54 North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Tredell County. January Term, 1922, James A. Thite ie ; vs JUDGMENT. L. B. Patterson) Tris cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court and being heard before His Honor, J- Bis Ray, Jucge ‘residing, and it appeat- ing to the court that the Plaintiff comes into Court and submits to a non- WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY ath, 1922, 629 yn s nr Ligy a This Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, Wednesday Lit: ; 5 : wT o Teal jan 2 +> fav + en eee <uideek in adjudged by the court that the plaintift Morning, February 8th,., 1922, for the dispatch of business, : be, and he i hereby non-suited and it is further adjudged that plaintiff nay the costs of this action. 2 yd Bie No oe de ie ay | Grad Hines and John Prox mM 44 ac <7 oe 9 f Judge Presiding. ee = ox This case was continued over from Tuesday, ne Vohee Feb e 7 th ’ and CG onsume qa th eé en t In e Aa ay oO f= + oe mnie aaa ar ee aa ae bars Be ee eee eee many + Hutton & Bourbonnais Co, vednes de 7, 1 eb, 8th., and continued over to — et Ot et DOGIIIG GIISIBW- Thursday, Feb, 9th,, 1922. BAD SYIBZIBAY YI 32 | | No, 40 J.E.Critz, Admr, of Mrs, *o Lula Cormichael { A 7 ‘ 4a 3 , vs XY Continued, Mrs,’ Esther Horn Critz, | , } ie - 1 Bnn Admx,. \ *penutyzuog . TT dea: . TH04s a ie ok ON ; NQe I,M, Rimmer vs fupAagore J.M, Joyner and Mills Co. p <2. 3 ntinineda CONLLINUEC, uw *penuyt yUoD *penutyzucp No, 85 A. LAL dridge vs Eupha Aldridge *penuyt Uuop No. 63 E.M.Archie vs 3,W.H. Johnston ey on No, 66 Mrs,’ Barbara Thompson Aamx, of J.C, Thon oe 4~m11e0 + vs Continued. on STITH puefaousor HL | J.0,Ervin, et al *penuytyUog eg t roumyy a's LY *ON i NOs TS | Sterling Mills : F 4 vs Continued. + scum Saginaw Milling Co. égqtap utoy soursa 7 8aH *ponutyUop sa | NO, 9 tt BTN : 1 Fo Lig eee | Statesville Lumber Co. * suf ‘ ° Uy 10 | vs. i. | C,H,.Knox Continued. top spauuoqmmog 1094 | No. 35 ‘ *Sc6T 2 ; C,B,Stewart, Admr. of : "16 ‘qed ‘fLepsunuy, 03 deao penuzyzuo? pus “Sh } Carl Stewart : 448 | 590d jo kep eaytyue euy peumsuoo pus **UdL . Ap ; ws \*qoqg ‘epsen], wous ueao penutquoo sem esso STUL xog uyor pus wr a Miller “enufacturing 0. Continued, *sseutsnq Jo yo lwsdstp euy Atos ‘sgé6T ‘euqgg Areniqed ‘*y*y ‘y00T0,0 0G'6 78 PeueAtOD 4.mog eTqQBsouc[H stu oh, "geet *°U4e8 AuVoUamaA *AVCSUNCHM WEDNESDQY, FEBRUARY 8th., 1922, No, 50 North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Term, 1922, adjudged that this action abates and that LOA de de the plaintiff and one-half against J, Bis Ray Tudge Presiding, the Superior Court, inuary Term, 1922, TTT “Tt Why JUALIN L cause coming on to be heard before Judge, J. Bis Rey, and of Z.V.Turlington, Attorney for the plaintiff for AYyryT NONS1 ry none-s fore ordered and adjudged that the motion be granted and the same is hereby non-suited end that the J, Bis Ray Tudse Presiding. SATURDAY, February 11th, 19 No. 79 ; North Carolina, Iredell County. G. M. Simpson ve 1 JUDGMEN J. P. Little ) This cause coming on to ve heard at this term of the of Iredell County, and being heard before His Honor, J. Bis ere and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff ones : It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Pia MK eC, and January game is hereby non-suited , and plaintiff is to payness y Judge Presiding. 3G9GIEBBAIABO @2a. peor ren 330 Tredell County. | WEDNES ONES DAY, FEBRUARY 8th,, 1922, M06 34 North Carolina, In the Superior Court - * “»s anuary Term, 1922, A;T,Rinehardt, Admur. of | J,P,Rinehardt, deceased, -VSe | Wooresville Cotton It to be heard before Judge,J, Bis ee J 4 a 4 r upon ne } nd a jury upon the close of the | plaintiff's evidence, | which motion w +\Va? + 701AQ) q wa sAas4saiace 4 a 3 therefore ordered and adjudged that the said cause and that the defendant go without day No. 83 North Carolina, | tredell County. } | Raymond Templeton vs |D,E,Turner, A.M, Turner end W, Ww, Turner \Trading as D,E, Turner & Co. (J, Bis Ray, and it appearing that the parties to th ae p Ln spp } 7 ithe gun in controversy to the plaintiff be, ® land it is further adjudged that the costs | . | i | |Z, V. Turlington This cause coming on to pe heard and being heard before Judge, this action have agreed that the judgment of the Justice of the Peace the possession of nereby affirmed laintiff to be taxed by the Clerk. J, Bis Ray Tudge Presiding. Attorney for Plaintiff A.L,Starr Attorney for Defendant Tnis Honorable Court takes.a recess until Thursday morning, 0 ofclock, A.M. February 9th., 1922, at 9:3 This Honorable Court convened fhursdey marning, February sal : ae oy, 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. Tae s No, 32 ~ 5 ‘WA OV TL AU Y J Hines and John Fox eves Hutton & Bourbonnais Co. No, 49 Teldon Kerr { o-VS= { Ju +r before His Honor, J. Bis summons was issued 29th luly lst., 1922, and the in this.cause, It is th by default for want of be taxed by the Clerk, complaint and the claim 1921, and that the plaintiffs cause of action in founded easly ascertained the amount due thereon and that no erefore adjud an answer upon the verified complaint upon mone Tt tae fanthar aa Lt 18 zurtunsr adju a he 11 e an) $ + and the amount of sale of said property shall be credit THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9th., 1922, for the dispatch of business, This case was continued over from Wednesday,’ Fepruery 8th., Le°this February 9th,, 1922, ghd given to the jury for their verdict about 5:45 o'clock, P.M, The jury returned their verdict at 8:00 o'clock, P.M, which is recorded on page 633 of these minutes, et ee In the Superior Court, January Term, 1922, Henkel-Craig Live Stock Co. j Q JUDGMENT. | | ad Tis cause coming on for hearing at this term of the Court | | Ray, Judge and it appearing to the Court that aa dey of June -, 1921 and served on the defendant | t was duly filed and verified June 29th | on a written | end chattel mortgage under seal and that it can be nsywer has been filed nsw 9 ged that the plaintiff have judgment y due dged that the plaintiff recover judgment of the 4 . Seven & 20/100 Dollars with action to Three Hundred an oO 1921, until paid and cost of this It is further adjudged that the plaintiff is the n the end delivery proceedings on selling to this action ed upon the judgment herein above verified, J, Bis Ray Juage Presiding. “NO. 34 North Carolina, |} Tredell County. | | a,T,Rinehardt, Admr, of JP. | Rinehardt, decease¢ 5 SU THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9th., 1922, In the Superior Court, Yenuery Term, 1922, Tnnm h allawan ff +), 3 = From the allowance of the motion of non suit at the close | 4 Pla t+aactimonw +h Aatfand of plaintiff's testimony, tne defendant excepts and gives notice of appeal to Supreme Court, Judgment of non suit, Objection by plaintiff. Overruled, Exception. Notice of appeal siven in open notice waived, Appeal bond fixed in sum of 350,00 adjudgec sufficient. 30 days allowed for plaintiff to file case on appest allowed 30 days thereafter ir | No, 32 ‘Worth Carolina, } Iredell Ceunsy.} | Grady Hines and Jonn Fox | Did the plaintifis, b | with the defendant for the cutting complaint ? Answer: YES. Ond:; Did the de j |alleged in the complaint 2 | | Answer: YES. j | entitled to recover Answer: ee aman This Hon February, 10th., 1922, 3rd; What damages, z $700.00 orable Court tak at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. Winh male nWaTTO? y "3M a : which to make answer or ountereCaSGy or ain te thage ve 3 be ©. eens TTT co udgre Fresilailnhsee 4 c wat f% eam In the Superior Loutr, Taniuaryw Tern 5.90¢ vanual of LClillly +4eH%6 wan ao u enter into 2 contract imer, as alleged in the fendant commit 4 preach of said contract, as f any, are the plaintiffs, or either them of the defendant 7 (Seven Hundred Dollars) es a recess until Friday morning » FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10th., 1922, Tis Honorable Court convened Friday morning, February 10th. , 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, No. 55 North Carolina, |} In the Superior Court, | | Te Tredel1 County. Januery Term, 1922, | | OF NON-SUIT. | j | } } | be heard at this term of the Court vefore | and the plaintiff has signified his | take a voluntary non-suit,. It is hereby ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that he is hereby permitted to take a voluntary non-suit, ordered and adjudged that the costs of this lerk, be paid by the plaintiff. J. Bis Ray Tudgze Presiding. Noe 19-6 In the Superior Court. North Carolina, January Term, 19°. 2 Iredell County. seph Hamoy and Clerk of jell Superior Court, J. A. and County Poard serorTm tion of Iredell County, FINAL JUDGMENI. Insurance * This cause coming on to be heard at January term, 1922, of Iredell Superior Court before the Honorable J Bis Ray, Judge presiding, and & jury and it appearing to the court that the matters and things in on | versy in said cause hate been compromised and that it has been agrect a and between plaintiffs and defendant that plaintiffs shall recover ju Re of defendant in the amount of five hundred forty-six and eighty-seven hu dredths dollars and the costs of said cause: It is now, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that Pe tiffs rocover of defendant said sum of five hundred forty-six and oe seven hundredths dollars and the costs of gaid cause to be taxed by + Clerk. J. Bis. say Judge presiding. Friday, February 10th, 1922. “No. 20 North Carolina, tredell County. In the Superior Court. January term, 1922. Joseph Hamoy, and Clerk of ) Tredell 3 LD ‘jor Court, Je A. ) Hartness, and County Board of ) FINAL JUDGMENT. Rducation of Iredell County, ) vs ) Union Fire Insurance Company. ) This cause coming on to be heard at January term, 1922, of Ire- dell Superior Court before the Honorable J. Bis Ray, Judge presiding, and a jury and it appecring to the court that the matters and things in contro- yersy in said cause have been cosipromised and that it has been agreed by and between plaintiffs and defendant that plaintiffs shall recover Judgment of defendant in the amount of seven hundred and fifty dollars and the costs of said cause: It is now, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs recover of defendant said sum of seven hundred and fifty dolars and the costs of said cause to be taxed by the Clerk. J. Bis Ray Scene acetate eee cet tn A OO Judge Presi line “Ov -< ‘ +405 0 18 arolina, County. . Kim ce Leup= mda jury ntroversy ; Venda } ; h \ 1d by and d cause have been co: POUL Oe SM ee ere ee a se tof “ or eee - ea * . sOefh a TO? wuAaLrheY O 7 s 2 2 P¢ snd defena int t} A YY) Lia ivl ' wit + ows JUGE x on p LaLN vs Pre roe oo : : 41 - ] ry 7 ee ndredths in the amount of seve coming on to e Court before the Honorable +- 4 aopearing to the co It is now, therefore, cons recover of defendant saie dredths dollars and costs Js } , NAY ns ea ener nem Presiding sy} wo ) I PBQOVOGAX . Q@BOO DARN XX No. l In the Superior Court. North Carolina, January Term, 1922. Tredell Countye The R. R. Manufacturing COes vs y DGMENT. $. R. Brown and Luther Brown, J partners trading and doing business under the firm name and style of 5- R. Brown & SON. be he This cause coming on to Sn the Superior Court of Tredell County be the January Term, 1922, of as suis Honor, J+ Bis Ray, Judge FRIDAY, FEBRUARY loth , 1922. ca npearing to the Court that the plaintiff has come ine Friday, a ¢ ermission to take 4 voluntary non suit. P | No. 38 to Court and a . q + € el ro x +. WwW } ~ : * +heref¢ ordered, considered and adjudged by the court that North Carolina, unerior Court ‘ pnere.s aa Uy uperlio} UC r © need oe be allowed Lo submit to a voluntary non suit and that plains plainvrse sts of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, Presidi: Pe Tredell County. ANI Mm - 7OA0° 4, An C anuAr’ Tarr oO .u the ¢ January Term, 1922. VO 2 T aoe Sa ea SRB ate Judge Presiding. In the Superior Court. Jamiary Térm, | 922. Company, ue said collect _ 4 Venu ALIA co of te de resident of tne tne commencement Oo v “end j j ‘ alleged the defendant commit adultry as ALlegea in } the plaine| ordered and ad judged by the Court ore ) 8 TIE ed an absolute s hereby & ant ope nero ,solv » and he ndant e L. Hartline, and the bonds of o ween the plaintiff and the defendant are hereby J. Bis. Ray Judge Presidings @G2DGIIIWH7.IW GIBB @@98G09:32G00G308 col! ectibleé. Frid a ctfully Qahmarv vwepruary, Y» February 10th, 1922. court to order said Receiver to a oe Pee neceiver tc auction for cash as provided by law e Wy ANe submitted. SON In the Superior Court r Court. Banuary Term y rm, OMY T muy mthAT« sie dads EVIT Joss sh and J anuary r I 1922 of a fate oe n : port of Dorm hompson, ht and permission to sell Y due the defendant, which be collected and are deemed | Cie a Panett Superior GCOUurte In the en T ? T y QO! January Term, 19ece to be appearing to the Court ¢ a. a 7 Y ~ ~ *. . , ) appear and prose > his action, | North Carolina, | I | Iredell County. : No, 52 North Carolina, | In the Iredell County. | January Term, 19 Superior Court, 2 9 22, Isidore Wallace vs Richard Moore and M ie lie C owan This Court of Iredel Judge Presiding at out in the recora. Tt is therefore ordered praintiff recover of the det fendants 36/100 Dollars, (9436.56) wit January, 1922, until paid further ordered and adjudg 1e ourt that the dred Thirty-six and ngOctoO fn he 30th day of per annum, Lt. 36 ne costs of this ro > Pp n 4 action to be taxed by v ne No, 52 . 7 C Court, Superior anuary Term,’ 1922 In the | Isidore Wallace vs | Richard Moore and rs. 3.9 | M.L, Cowan " indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in 1. Are the defendants What sum ? ’ m Nov. 29th., 1920 until paid, . est fro Answer: $548,00 with inter n defendants Ss, is the plaint tiff indebted to the defendants 0 counter-claim and if $0, in what amount ? Anever: $150.00 One Hunderd anda fifty Dollars. LOC Wo, 67 ; C.M,Steele, Admr, of J, C,Steele, deceased followin, urors, to-wit: Rome Branch, . a -Gampbel R, Fox, Js WwW. Weaver, R. L, Alexander J,L, Lentz, G.M.Foard, R. H, Brown Pk. asetow, and Jas, L,Reid, were a cnpannelled for their verdict, ft - continued over to Saturday, Feb. wath | 4 vs Mrs, Annie MeKensie Steele Ls FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10th,, 1922, | No. ‘15 Ber reee senna In the Superior Court. | Iredell County ) January term, 1922. |¥. E. Morrison, Jr., vs Y. W. Murdock and wife, JUDGMENT. Florence Murdock No, 51 North Carolina, |} Tredell County. | In the Superior Court,. T ; January Term, 1922, This cause coming on to be heard at the January term, 1922, of the wie yg a |Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, J. Bis Ray, Judgue Pre- i t “a siding and‘a jury, and it appearing to the court that the parties to this ac+ t ti ns 1 4 2 oe - ‘ a JUDGIENT tion, having settled and adjusted the differences growing out of the matters vs and things set out in the pleadings, on the following basis. viz: That the E, L, Brady 6 plaintiff isite Be: declared the owner in fee of all land North of the present South bank of the branch; that the plaintiff shall my the defendants $70.00 for a part of said land and *19.00 for th mainder « i 4 th a 1 ; ; : Y i of saia no 729.0 or the remainder of said land, and that Honor, ¢. Bis hay, Judge Presiding, anc it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff shall be entitled to credit for $60.00 on said-sum as of Nov. narties to this action have adjusted and compromised their differences 1st, 1920, same being rent for theyear 1920. _ ae , ner . p ‘ ' : db 4 é 4 ss L ViILS al a e + consent, It is adjudged that the’ plaintiff recover of the defendart the} It is therefore ordéred, considered and adjudged by the Court that th@ um of One Hundred and Fifty Dollars, are * plaintiff, W. =. Morrison, Jr., is the owner and entitled to the possession Tt is adjudged that each.party pay his own RENAESE SS and that lof that certain tract of land in Iredell County, North Car., described as fol.: A § : - fad 4’ 4 waa 4 . AW OWE i A Aw e* pay the Court costs to be taxed by the Clerk, "Beginning at a fallen red oak on the Yest line of the property of ¥. i ss Morrison, Jr., in Shiloh Townshin, and running thence South 602 E. 80 poles, J, Bis Ray to a stone, formerly a poplar, on the bank of the branch, corner of the land Judge Presiding of %. ©. Morrison, Jr., and ¥. W. Murdock; thence uthward in the course of q Morr S OY "s Rastern boundary line to TKN South bank ete branch; then¢ge . ; eT eee ae oe oe Monsees tr. me plrainvilrt . Jestward with the South bank of the branch, as , now runs, approximately 109 mis cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before, —_ ’ ” je ie poles to a point where said branch cragses the stern boundary line f the and D,L, aymer + el property of %. %. Murdock; thence N.~67 5. approximately 8 poles to said fal+ ? . sv) A wal ‘mm 3 ge See ae F . r the aevendant, eae len red oak, the ANYWAY Ye Narth \# +hea ¢ ~} ‘ & wil Ji 2 ’ +> 38 fur! plaintiff is t bank Frc OVE y a ae In the Superior Court, 4 <r T 2 January Term, 1922. vw JUDBMENT n Box CO. action having adjusted their differences the vlaintiffs revover of’ the defendant — t from Jangary SOth., 1922, i the plaintiff pay one-half of the Court and that the defendant pay one-half of the oO o a act © Oo a far b ts ¢ ret co BO . ~~ Qu Oo js . non eer O ct SO d tute fete fs oti own a“ 2 costs and 1vs @ t t 4 S ct ° 3 ct . J, Bis Ray Judge Presiding. YS NE Nie m i \ y;wmaN 2. T, Weatherman A+++ nmawe. fan KttLOrNeys LOL YIY> MIRA MRED PPBBES YAY aYaY ve DAS OY D Yayax WIJ AY WAYaVS) ADDS AY KOE No, 50 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } January Term, 1922. The undersigned comniss! ! ould respectIulily report. he court PT M Panicins t ¢ 1 Pelig rEPKINS g eve it 7 =e : i | 2 ' ms 3 £» } hawzea arti lad ale thay H,M, Jenson, f th that pursuant to’ an'oraer o sourt id ee? Lit i Cause, they a mu . . f ‘ ‘ . i 5 ee y Be ars eet ATs rT ‘ } / ana truck Dow Trustees of } 5 i lexposed to public: sale in the cit; : C ndiana truc Ss © Tt? Ts + aA tT WwW " ive lt eoprowmn ana e tie i iC A the Southern Trading Co JUDGMENT ah be laeseribed' in the complaint and judgment, at hich sale the commis ner re= | F Se aa “ hain AS me ie Py RT” ata an tnereased. bid of 10 per vs t ‘ sived a bid for $65.90; +t , 20 ae 5 1 a f 10 pe # + ; C.B.Porter and F,0O nd ten os lcent was placed: thereon; that aan +) tnaon: took ue perior said ¢puc for sale, the attorneys for the a lant: | inson, took U} a AS ? ‘ . " d am 4iis 5 ‘y rnd > This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Tredell pe 10 : , with the attorneys for the piaintift, moe: Bneuer of Mee Os DL tee earE a * , + rT ‘ Ye " at D ren Sy + WS ® hat h ? E SLE neys Lor Une I -s Lnviii na Court before, His Honor, J,. Bis Ray, Judge Presiding and ®& suns er i the judgment rendered in this cau e5 cnet, n ney cae nee Nadenat pleintifM@being called in open Court and having failed to appe ’ ‘ to the attorney for the defendant, a proposibib™ TN a ke tad oe prosecute this acti hee. pendered in this cause, whereby the defendant should make a cash payment and pros ee eee ee ae iaintiffs» Pi le ene said judgment by real estate mortgage; that this It is therefore considered and adjudged that the P Sd0RTe tne DRTENCE Cue ee ee ue Astandant by his attorneys; that pending sa they are hereby non-suited, ene ccamtasioners were required to noid ; the comrissi oner: could re-advertise afen . . »D od t sition was accepted for | a! proposition was accep were required to hold the on be taxe # ¢ ons settlement, the commissionerr were required to Ae up | the agtntttte GAA th ir beet Ler tne eto of ate aoe & Ind. 0 | § eat ob onc? (ound did hold up same; that after said Boe eae | ‘ 7 Caen ‘ co ) = cepted: by the attorneys for the defendant, the defendant himself fled the | + R county and left for parts unknown, thereby preventing the set*lement. agreed... Sraee -Prestaing. me i by snes saeaads for both partiessand when this was made known the res : : > ae sioners, said commissioners duly reeadvertised said truck for ape & es : required by 1a¥, at public auction in the City of Bamgtteville, of ahs ‘ OGG OQ QABQRE 2QQLRG ae ‘ a f December, 1921,:at which sale J. 1. Thomas pe Senses te aaa Wk ; SA Ader for the tame at the price of $100.00; that: | le no inen Q Q oS a CX ATI OROA a ae ; e Pr . . fei = bie ua , ¢ , , arene arma Le : , ed bid has been placed on same, but the Garolt oe 4 ‘ley & ; since date ae re Tees ince date of the firsé, rly impossible to sel¥ bhan the Carolina nRantoan and recommend to the ‘cour for the sum of aq4 name said commig- and th ne ts Wipe Ind the Coes Lu) irst, of costs of 10k } nayvmen phew - . * ¥ : rk of this irt and ‘t) he judgment rendered in this cause, ~OnO ‘Gees re no y+ y mount renains Dorman Thomoson R. T. jeathe rman the Superior Pre 4+A4 ~ 56 HORSE) oe ee read 14 apneew ee upo One ee ana truck described in 2zuction on an eH - the oe that 0 oe t upon different of 3265.00; last and lig bidder at Fhe court that t e Carolina the first in th shi le, due to t that the 265.00 be, of whe pre e costs 1ers into the bale that execue e due on irt that 1ots of ville ’ said | from ne North sian ailroad : the runni j in yo Te feet t stake hence “- pecs . dirt road; thence N. 64 degrees 4% era cae containing 1/4 of § 1ere more or 1eSSe thi cakee’ of Si 500.00 sai property game was bid off by hae te Ho $11, 000.00,Following S803, 0s an increased bid was per of ; ee end rene rs of 7500.90 following this 4. B. ay amount is all to. 9A" eee In ‘he opinion of your commissioners, ars amount {s 411 that cep be obiataee er ania property and is a fair Sim to the isco oy Sones ind said commissioners would respectfully , a ee said sale be confirmed by the court upon the folLowing rns iS One-thire fac Weer a eight eee oe ar pee in cash, one-third in four months ,&n cars oa oh interest on deferred payments until paid, Pe ee oe eee be preserved until said purchase money is fully pai Thi 5 LOth day of February 1922. PFs Dulin D a Receivers. 'No.78 \North Carolina, iIredell County. J. T. Smith and others Vs Iredell Farmers’ ! This caus erior Court of upon the report ceivers have,obtained defendant, and deserive the court that t! appearing further arate dates and +} 7 7 the court: c2 s+ QO tt 2 es Cru 4 2 +3 Commissioners would report tha sale and since said judgment vit: on the 1st day of Decembe: drafting said $189.40, Das dition of Sé udgment on the with said A. re entitled to receive the time, making the amount due the Wherefore, and to the parties in this acti that judgment be entereu In the Superior Court. : foanuary Terr 92° January Term, 1922. , ’ 7 A0 ee 2 Ferm, 4 9 : . cere rT. 2 : ; Praaia — RAY dg sia to the court that the re- he property beloni to th@ f ~ Tv . ° t+ apneari! e for Court that ivers t «ae respects con in cash, ong eferre d y a Lite conveyed sistake ; imgmont 5 AT Y a Ps ry ¢ 7A C8 AAY an ac oo 2 judgment une AmOUnY ane. oh pee is incorrectly states as being the said amo nt shou d ‘have been pue' t iat after the rene- 1st day of \uguet, | aj H. Cashion, and under said decd and contract fle Mary E. Pag@ sum of $24.85 for said additional plaintiffs the defendants the sul 01$344.85 A your com ssioners would respectfully suggest to he court on that said former judgment be corrected and a .t this court for the entire amount due the plaintiffs Masioners be ordered and by the defendants, to-wit $344.85, and that said commissi directed to advertise said land rendered at the in the manner and Way set out in said judgment August Term, 1921, and cut of the proceeds of said sale pay to the plaintiffs the amount due on gaid judgment, paying the balance, if any, to the defendants in this case. This 3ist day of January» North Carolina, Iredell County. A. H. Cashion and wife, Annie Page Cashion vs iG. S. Page and yife, Bessie Page This cause coming on to filed in this cause and being h isiding, and counee1s for both P It is considered, ordere jare entitled to recover of the amount set out in the judgment and said amount is hereby decla G. S. Page and his heirs by the ed in the office of the Registe 149, ttaching to sai It is further having died on the 1s It is therefore Dorman Thompson and Zeb. V. appoin'ed, are hereby directed Long, the comnissioners this court neretofore — G. S. Page and his heirs by said the Court house door of Iredell 1922. illy submitted, man Thompson V. Long mmissioners. JUDGMENT. «) be heard upon the report of the commissioners | eard before His Honor, ¥. ls Brock, Judge Pre laintiffs and defendants agreeing thereto: d and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff defendants the sum of 4344.85, in lieu of the rendered in this cause at the August Term,192] rea to be a lien upon the land conveyed to decd dated 6th day of March, 1916, and record r of Deeds of Iredell County in Book 53, page d land upon ‘he 6th day of March, 1916. to the court tht Mary E. Page is now dead, cember, 1921. considered and adjudged by the court that and empowered to sell the land conveyed to deed above described, at public tio sunty, to the highest bidder, @ ishing a notice once a week for four weeks in some new ; . oo sens by in iseaetl County, said sale to be made on the following tenmanee a: FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10th., 1922. eae! Fad ash; one-third in six months and one-third in twelve months. Sa : One-thire eo 7411 report said sale to the next term of this court for cone comaissioners | a rommissioners ire further directed out of the proceeds of: Ce «Gs oo ane ind discharge this judgment and costs of this action, een " i. hal ance re aining, & any, to G. Se Page and his heirs, or tary. ee fa retained for further orders, “= an a J. Bis Ray a Judge Prestding. oe | rig wal > * e be vs Continued JeW. Cox Ho, 68 .. Harlee “atson + vs wr Herold “atson Tn the Superior Court. -" 1¢ y A139 wT T -, wer gor January Term, 1922, No. 95 William Osborne vs Continued Bessie Morrison Osborne No. 97 bn 8 Term, 1922 Mae Steadman [Iredell County, and it annearing to the Court th vs Continued } ‘ssues as set out in the record. John Steadman ‘considered, ordered and adjudged by defendint the sum of 5700.00 and No, 63 Clerk of this court. E,.M, Archie JI, bis Ray i ‘ vs Judse Presiding. : J,W,H, Joriston 5 : A thio Fs rjayru ° oninzt on to be hear t the January ( AL us a é de tnd OY * J ( — DGBDYIBBRRADADAS AO Od@WOS DAS Tw No. 64 ee Brady Brinting Co. vs d42.purns No. 68 W.W.Call & Co. the Court before His }> a Continued and the a ry nave J,H,Robinson, et al yeu As oO upon No. 70 Mrs. Ella Higgins, et al vs Continued J,H,Robinson, et al “ P and entitled to the possession of the ai nt" . No. a >ed by the Court that the defendant Annie Me entitled to the possession of the property ANA sei we ws A wes as 2 i el h - a One #illlys Knight Automobile anc “4 ey No. 65 : ‘ken ae > ie tescrided in i - Pathe Musical instrument descr! Ot ae Sterling Mills (Inc.) na the cost to de taxed by the ont ae VS . £4 + rains : ee * nswer which shiarge is fixed agains P,A,Reavis Co. J. Bis Ray | Judge Presiding . No. 96 ‘ Be North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.| January Term, 1922, MeKensie Steele) it \ sses> | oo . 7 and enti o the po A,Hartline j Is the nlaintiff the owner of the property and entitled - O of the property discribed in he complaint ? AnS.e No. hat is the value of said property ? ‘ ANS « TY vs j SSUES “iy Essie L, Hertline () No. 67 C. M. Steele, Ext. vs Annie McKensie Steele) tde the verdict afd £ | 2: "Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of On coming in 9%. verdio® plaintiff moves t eaneiis naan and defene | North Carolina for five years prior to the commencement of this action ? a new trial. Motion overruled and pilaintift « . Notice | Answer: YES, objects and accepts and gives notice of rh tit ge 4° a Saga of Vouns@atee 3 Did defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint 7 given in open Court, further noticed noticed Wa p of case. / Answer: YES. Plaintiff allowed thirty days in which to make Lae ee a ‘appeal defendants allowed thirty days then after, in whic of $50290 adj |counter case, file exception. Appeal bond fixed in sum ; , ) oe | 1, Did the plaintif and defendant intermarry as alleged in the | complaint ? ; Answer: YES, sufficient. Tis Honorable Court takes a recess until Saturday morning, ie 5 ; | a | | Judge Presiding. aon a @ Febrilary 1lth,, 1922, at 9:00 o'clock, ; fae cS vee th 303006300 3943 ; sia cage ah ‘ XK) 3039000053308 pee ee ee th : | : as ON } | SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 11th,, 1922, 1 a tan “ .17? 2 S Mis Honorable Court convened Saturday morning, February 114 9:00 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business, In the Superior Court January Term, 1922, ard at he d l of the inty . (s Hor Judge Pres nearing les to this nut of the mate basis: That the diffi lties } ! appearing furthes be sted tl nleadings on ‘ r » A he sum of 3900.0! as paid to Pp: f said amount: ordered and adjudge. by the court that endant in this action, and he taxed by the Clerk @& s f the def s action > Lo Ray Judge Presiding. ourte Superior C rm 19226 January Te and defendant intermarry 4s State of North | beén a boni fied resident of the j to the commencement of this action ? , 1g omplaint ? AnS-. Yes. it adultry as alleged in ¢ 3, Did Defendant comm Ans. Yes. 093200 GAG3B006 @3D922I2G908B08 ¥ 902, Coabirnsel —~ ie ‘ ’ SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 11th,, 1922, Mis Honorable Court convened Saturday morning, February ll the M,, for th dispatch of business, In the Superior Court. January Term, 1922, January Term, 1922, of the : s Honor, J. Bis Ray, Judge Pres” Court that the parties to thig” 2s growing out of the mate ngs on the following basis: That/2ice & 00. And it appea ‘plaintiff said and adjudge he defendant n to be taxed Superior Court. January Term 1922.6 nd defendant intermarry 4s alleged in the compl 2. Has P beén a boni fied resident of the state of North for two tor to the commencement of this action ? Ans. Yes 3. Did Defendant commit adultry as alleged in compl int ? Ans, Yes. Gd2I9e GIBIBIVE @3032990300808 , Pa} we State of North Carolina Department of Archives and Historp Raleigh CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY This is to certify that the microphotographs appearing on this reel are true and accurate reproductions of the records listed on the target (title) sheet preceding each volume or series of records microfilmed hereon; that the records were microfilmed on the date and at the reduc tion ratio indicated; and that on the date of microfilming, the records were in the custody of the official or other individual listed on the target sheet(s). It is further certified that the records listed on the aforesaid target sheet(s) were microfilmed in conformity with the provisions of Sections 845.1 - 845.4, General Statutes of North Carolina; and that in order to insure archival quality and authentic reproduction of records filmed, they were microfilmed in the manner prescribed,and with equipment and film approved, by the State Department of Archives and History. (Signed) EY attic Camera Operator END OF REEL i ei, ** ee 77 = a40! ; ¥ : bie 3 q 2 | aoc a ia i a fp Sh é ’ ‘ . js Fe eA re Laon etme ee ee — —— ~ _ -“ — ern te me LG ET CTE RTE LENT Ce OS ORNL I RED ee tenet = ee < : ee - : a Se : ! r ; | QE, ttn, Gldashp | 4 | fe, Uy b, We: 2.45} i { } t | : 4 i | f \ } t , 4 i | é | ‘ ‘ t | f ; } | | 7 + | | t { { | | | 5 | i | | 7 1 ? | | ¢ | si : y | i os { ap 2 i | be | } - | t a t a ¥ me f e ns bi hticteccgec re 8 ve ae ; . y anes tre te ta f e u ‘ Tare See ae RR TS a ap epccongii SS RU el ln eRe SS apes tog = etna X Se =e a rn ee ee ee eee ee ee a Go aes eapiaeea iat Bit 262 Nplluaclh F344, 24d Geile Aga een shed Hou, 3 ae oS 2 or thin pa Bie: Ngee 4 SY Contin tr YO ae | eau U2, oo. Bom 272) U2 De ccuradadi, er 277) bx Uerniect Toitrt t 2081. | 30 |\larkr, yp)», aq) &% Baca. ftoss Lee I22G] Fa balla, Lables 2537 70 |\lay Fa taf 290 P2N abdul f ltr £0,u0k \3§0 | / 1 2f\ bonus’ MY, tal PRE LY i; 2 hay PAF | VA GM = /a3 ES 1 Me Y/ "B42 4 SSB PFS 1, Faoola% Wr Pasir Yam, MM Wuntac, hece 2.5%) ot. Datdsar Lorie Ect Iypans, AMAA. Deg. OL, snide. be ; PRR Ce F3KK ppene t tede . pi | 259? soy 385 2 94 374 349 34 ale PF La 2X 215° 14.3 304 3037 41Y ALY JO ¥ es iad rien beet ly he leienbintonelliniate <atom ee SS scene pcre hreaeeeaeeeegeereenecee Wf neesnnatsarnninaningl ascetic sxe ee 3 x i Ree ripe tee tc eR sc fare be gene Teendaneth Das gah het lel Hale Siplge, [an #8 fool ni thes Ua Zitlurhu, 1 dint Lia Ee wit ae, 294, o Et, 50a tei ai oe we lal, i WE +14, 6 aw; Whe, tuff Afok Chast Grawh UW. ude shui ELE ih a , veh Walt & KIS 4 ap 45% YEO Abb AS ee PF? = a seseeecleraee gs We At Wie * an eg oe _____ Nhradeabede, Ph tel | 19/ i A eens Pade MEAL. i 4 Meliatsand od pe (24K 2E7 3) @ |- EO La i ior EH BOT be op Sh iS a lens “ey fee AB + CE APA |ke7 _ EEL | Punts, HE stalk. |G AL Yuerfe $2} \ 79 , a ae SAG i pee 58 7 ay | aol an —_— oni — . sae a - Pr Sea ag git A Na Sy ee es Bee oy Sea eae FS ig UES bee de a ee Se eed awd EAS ee —_ ee ae ? 25% 3/3 339) ZF 3 4) | ioe | Bi LP AF | 259 SoS Ratan si eid pose sid ads Pro tnrnnsonnsnnaial - . Rs a | Millan Catal #5 > 76 Jos7P fiz BE a: ; a ae 2 7. LO] 7 - an IGTtSLF hoof Ge, 184,164, 18S /SF feet fie £ ¢¥ ee Lot tf 7 O droig hl ly ke dete ; 23 ay lath: 6 Wot7_GZ 27 1 dysAeeoch A ") f/ oie ie ft a sibvieicenseiocsniial 1a ite ss snareneeceninncertnenssisnietlactrinnemetesnrinensnneipcinane r = “ 7 | a } es amen pereimenernsie <= - " SS SS agg i { i ; i a aon pee nsnps ar ereirenenetcnmall snes smeast 271 aa 2 GS4/ 3¢0. JEP BFF 44 23 Lula [ 433% 34 UZ A. Glace $27 O04 |34 5 RWefrad [460 » ft, af |e by HL, t a |_| ig 4 | ee | | os KC | } | | ined ~~ sie 7 ee ccineait \ nn. eli a ee - y <n tany nami — tt a 4 ne "4 Feet jes . Png, ; BS aS eae ro Pontes ie Be nan ina te . TI tetas - a : € singin 2 ‘ e - s { greene: O54, %-BIr 14, pol Lae " oe ' ‘ v 7.’ . ; l q Te nen nhc snl us : saa — H ae He | : I } 1 a a a oe eS 4 i i ‘ PANS | | (¢@S | ULLAL Fea. 1 e eee Ugo i“ i © t } ' es | | 5 . { z e aC | | ‘ oof 4 oy ' 4 | | i | | pd inh bl pedal : | ! | i ! | ee be GE ya | | | f fi | | | , | | Le ti | ; ~ Eee i | | és eee ~~ mitt i Ser J | _ . } slicing 4 — b | en ee a Pee ths es a anf eeernreenne enh —+—— | — } rea ms - — nas ini ia iia atten staeescaniaall a innsanuiasteniisaiinatiaamannisetisnnatett te ae see | | ately cite ae ieee nnectsinitinnin mattis spine es oe es om a es } j ¥ tt ble i +static 3 silting * shinanonetan seioan ‘ tty es saiuaitia ht ell etn ds I a sclhiaeliaiagianaindii sealinciaiisaiuesiial # wel on * tl ie, 4 eon c nee * 4 : e ieencnlenneeteenilbens a sl ncaa mY ~ tates enter ateteeastelhien mananmnnitiianveanetsal a ee i a a sis i iikapeslna ‘ De ie a mmc mewn a em ena one * i -: us <a ~ —eeenceneinhelltnataeaneen nin tsuneo eae a Ss ian ae 9 oe on G i oe ie idee . ba sdidaaauietalt kak cue, ake a Se a i = 4 So: eee | | Nn, 9 hur, 209, dornclaner 97g] — 4 x a : “ ; wena a “ ‘ ii iiiealibin enciliniiiccisicig ia ta CS ‘ }j “e e : a pein eninge » . 4 > : < wt a t ‘ 43 . " . wre a. ae Bee —maencennoean — } at. e ¢ ‘ ne a soshononi catia : : ‘ . fp Boos erent ceteris sai neu ; is i be ina oe 2 * “ aren : 8 + <A mee ia shdesineepliitiianiiiinen ey i ees Ra aes ‘ : ~ * roe ee ty : thn etnentatanatatnsaeanennny ‘ x ae a} te 3 4 > i ae 3 sialon ¥ . , oA ¥ aoe eee a + Bs ae pa ‘Z se w ts ; a a — : bk. i : i ae eee Tate as ¢ ke mM % i aia ie TN Bal Silas 4S OS Ne oA as di Sift. ™ beset hay i ies 4 i ‘ aye ‘ Soot g: ; . A Sob cbaeee e oe “ Mens parti wed > é ek a er * = 3 § i u ee seh he: i i $$$ ' i } } 7 ee ‘ = ot ee SES aS ee > So ae eee beet em Lots, nnitler dav3 gel, WL. cant 29 | Moore Faurndad (b-\4o¥ /o4\ Me 4o- 37H mr ef |/29|_, , Wh ste 314 Po gy ae yt Y2Y Y : ; wil ea | milla, Ta 136% ¥ esl I34l YC, Mil, KY erie 8 once fh Me ob 490 Seeger we . ops © semper et es ea jamtransrnennriennt one amemtnip sens 1 rey ne corel eenregisninntinencoccenteeta anamnestic RI eR — - pe eS. } | | | i i | | | | on = soe SSS rT ' t . | j ay r T ¥ | a i ] | | | ne ae | Ay | | = eit 2 ‘ | | VWsi sya gwsey 9 | SN NDS SYS a NY f a ee Eee = Bon’ Pog 3 | s | | a Pd < Ya 1S ond - cal cc aieaclici olin aise Me we ee bf ’ | | . en pee eed | | | ' | | ! eS i i | | | } | = e ncaa sei =. See EEE SS nase ennai «+ nai _—_ = —===—= SSS 1 } x} o eoeeese spe = = = += oa t = = + = + = + pen te + ~+— + + + eS $e ES ee SS S a hE apes a 5 aay he i | : 4 a” foe | fe i i i | a 2 P = | | : ‘ s | oe i j | i i i | i i i i 4 Lcaien ee dacdaaieiniee 4 4 esas canconnemiaes as ! | } | ‘ 3 | : | | we es i : } Bi } | | ; ion 2 © — siennl dn : i ’ ES RR ER oR NG Sere ag Oe : llr. i } ee =< ’ ’ ’ | T | | i } j i i | i i { i i | | i j j I ; f ; j i ; ae i { i ae ee eeren | He { ' } = 9 { j ; | } i } i r psy esos 3 i | i i} | z + SS ETS $= ot: sagem re = SSS oe a =. = Be a . i i i | ae } } i sea i Pa | | ott | | | 1 | | i ; i i we A & ' ; x i i ' ; a | | . i | 2} i j i i | i | he oh oti oe i i iisadiniaiiaaaad lia " even oe sen = if i i ecient 4 i SS | t | ees | ty a 2 a - Se a a a 2 VA te +.) tj ea eS — animeosesnset ; ; i ' St ena ee 3 i i i : i i x i i ¥ : i i ‘ i j | i ' i i } ‘ i i i 1 i : | | = i Po pe | ee ; j i | Bee 7 | j j pe j j i 7 | - i i \ | i j | ' | j | Eat | econ fof ecg } i j i | j | | i j j j i j Ee \ \ i : \ \ ' i ' | i } i ; ; i } j i i } i } eno ge opp Oy eee a ran Romebararpremto 4 preparer | por e s erence hae eT Pt pad \ : Saag pop | i | ' ' | 4 | | | + T + r oS a : | ' ‘s 3 | 2 | i 4 j } | ; i ' | $ i j | | i ; i j i d i 4 i ' i 4 | § i 4 a a NL SSS === ; i | ; ’ i i i i | i i 4 —= = Specenae ea ST moma | a | | | . ; : 1 cieseeesifenisineanneiasiansinincatannsie perennation i ia 4 | i . ae . | Hy u - + i i | a | } | ee } i j ! j } ' i ' ; ! bes j j E | i : - ; I | i ——— a a Bc ie aaah i 5 i j 9 i i ‘ ; ; ie | i ‘. i ® + eg a = = ==¢ | ’ : i a j j ES | | : | i { 4 or | {i 2/%) 2Y¥ST 24] Zl itheavied Beit Loe, Luar lea 6 : oy ope Bo , - -p eg LMFT _ EX cipal rk a ‘ Ke eo ved Bsa Gee. fos Len go. Meh Yj 2 gy Ag pal Choe Lk EUS a6 flttep- A IB. 5/2) 920 oad | TeL0 | Spe age se set: i oe } ine ia nae - ee . seal eels — ‘ oy sy at * “HA, Ba he aie bs ie wg ns wie ig wen Foy 2 st auieie R Rk RNS 9 lk an ! rf Ve rate ton 72sec rhe a” 32¢ th | 35 Tehy st 295-2 x4. gs ie | 7 84 dour, Fy Wn, 304,307, 303~ Yeoplninaie |” 30 tk al. 320 flit Eh | B40) Pil Aaa Map bute SAF J ash Losnarhir Uc 29/, | 27H tsy 29k ee fat 327 PW alTe_ PPG ana 4) | 33 2 Ais. RG. : SG. Mecaadn, tneof 364 9 2 bid pacanaaeee pM li /3 ae “ 6 dalls U2 92 \ a3 Ko YX HOF A/] Yr , ‘ a es > 3 ay | | | 7 1 : | | | = Li ae jale | _seeeem ope _~ Ly pot 23,2) ¥-) 0% 170%. Ubbet Uv. 2L, taf a | ~ jap i | i i 4 Be atti | i} : it | | * 1 | ie i i t t or ! i } } 5 cca q i I i ic I = | ; ; ey | , > : . ne | | i i i i ne | ; gree Bee oe | j | ; i i i | | | i : | | a i } z i j - i | 3 | | } | g i 3 i ' i | | i i j i j i ; ae | | | | i i i ah eS ih eee iain 7 : ' i | i i | 4 i i See ee Tr T ' + " i i = ' es j i | | ; i i i i i i i i | | | j ' j i ay Be | j ? i ' | i | te | ; : i 2 i i i i oie i wat ‘ : | a pad i | ae } } | | i i S poapecmane a = { } i i i i j | | j borage foes) pepe | i j | j } pits } \ | | ‘ | j ) : | | } \ \ : | : i i } i i | ' ; cape oe ek ee ee po ae oe ener caer ae | i | i | i i | 1 | i | i | } \ } : SSeS gSasy pomp pr ee pe Saar \ ci | . i ' i ; | | i | | | , i j i | | | : ot Cs = + = ee =e =s = = wh ge ee ae | + | ” j { | | i | | | ' 4 one a a oe ——+ + + + > + + + + + + + _ aa + mde + + + anal males a ee ae vel ; + T T : i : | i ' | i ‘ | | i | i z j | i i i | i i i i ' : LC | i | i j | ge j j j t a : i ' S 3 i i S | j aS i ; - , seen jemi pec pes pe Sp RS , ‘ $ ‘ 5 , ‘ , ‘ ‘ | + osleinscianibiesiheneritied a | | . | ae ee: oe | Td nek cork } i i bcckskact i f i i ; ' ' + + | 4 j i 3 ; i | } | i + ; f | ' we aS EEE == +o + = ey SE es SS SS ES , z ; : i i a i ' i i | Ree i i | | i i i i } j c : i } i zy j z | | i i | —_ —~ - ——--+ - a _ ee - - ~- > —_— +—-— 7 -~. — ee . _ — — . ; ’ ‘ : i + ' : : i ‘ } : r : | } i ; i i i ' i i j | ' } ; i i i | j i | } | i ; | j i i i j ' j i | j 1 | | | > i | i i ' i } i : | ' } ex i is ; ; Sees I } = i i % i } a ; ' fy nes 102\ | ao & —_—_—_—— ——— i - ; s | ae ; j i ES ‘dal So Hi | : ee | + [ | | ; i ; oe | ' } } ff se } } } | | | | - ; ; j ; } | j , 8 “ } ; j | | es | j j | 1 i | | j j } \ { } | | \ } } { \ | ' : j ; j | i i i | \ } i \ \ pet pepe oe eer pee Leoeatcembse | ; j } } ' | : i ; i i } ‘ i i ; Yn f } : ; | ' ! | | | } 3 E | | | | ! ; 1 \ : ; pee ene | | Pe | | = a = a enn == : ? : . = = SoS =a = SS mone + = | 1 ae | | | | i j a ' ae . | + - + + > + + + + + cence ; ec nl a a nth ~- — + ~ > - | i a ; | ¥ i | ; i % | i | i i | j ' i | i i j | ‘ ae ; i } i - Se ean wei : * ; = = = 2 > ss: ; = = * * = + 2 2 2 + + * = apes eS a= a 7 ) ————+ eer LL i j : i i ‘ 5 i | a Tt 7 i Tt en EE IR ’ | | a ae a = am * i gs ’ ee re 7 T i | i =e = | | rence Pein tn aes, a4 Ee ere oe ' ogee =a cee \\ ¢ } i + { { i ne 4 | i bie ie L1G hd CE | [4G Xo"er e ‘ Mi J (/a teat) es | fied a Diiecansillp toile. 2 LYa% /2/ , Horr Llu ds, Ure}. |W elaren frontal, tery 150 Me | Mol, Joa, ¥ Male. 108 0 ¥- eee | Zoo vies, 7 | ae ee ak us| We Tl | Zoo | eee Le tea: 2 Z)¢1 i 2. 2145 + ' ) 44 05 ~ D495 FSVKISSY SSH NGISS West | / 3) ZEA 243 z i at ene ae ' i i i i i i x 1 T | i Gas i ; | oe ayes { ee j | a a | : | | | i ' i i . | ; j j | | | Bo Ee | | i } Si bo c e s c a n t | | ‘ | | ¥ : . ! : 3 | ' ‘ | j i } pa ge | XE t i ; i ; ' } } } \ sapuraensre j ; se | | ; | | | * | | | | | | == corde. i i i ; == eo pe I I =e === + ’ ' ee =o + + | | i | i | li i i - i 4 ensiwenind 6 a aioe a soi is ne —+ - —+— ~ | i an T i } a j i | i j } | | j | i i | i j i } } ; | i 9 j =A | i és i j i : | j ' i — i i a © = + + + + += + = = SS | eee eee = — ee | 3 i ' i 4 + eee hen t + + - + + + + + Baitiny oe | pn + —t +- - ~_ - | ' i ; i j ; | ' i i | i i i i i ' | i i i } < fed i i i i i i ; | i i | i ; i i i 1 oe — aa es 7 } ; ‘an : ' ; Wy : i } | ' ; So peal ated i en . P ee i . 4 January Térm, 1922, continued from Minute Docket Book Saturday, February llth., 1922. os No, 65 North Carolina, |} In the Supérior Court, Tredell County.} January Term, 1922, Sterling Mills, Inc. -VSe i P,A,Reavis, Trading and 0 Pi ieee eek ® doing business under the J nna firm name and style of { P,A,Reavis & Company j r t te tie Tis cause coming on to be heard at the January Term, T 1922, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, FaMSs oe td a J, Bis Ray, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and it appearing to the vu Court that the defendant through ; ns W.D. Turner, Esq., has come into Court and asked leave I 1draw the answer hereto- = fore filed and consents that judgment may be entered for the amount set out in the It is, therefore, ordered, considered * the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of ‘1200.00, together with interest on $600.00 from Warch 17th, 1921, interest on $600,00 from April 17th,, 1921, until paid, subject a credit of $120.00 as of April ™ 921, and the costs of is action to be taxed by ther Clerk of this Saturday, February lith., 1922. v In the Superior Court Carolina, |} In the Sup z Tanwar’ Tear go 1 County. | January Term, 1922, he January Term, 1922, Honor, J, Ba Rey, laintifr® filed 1921, claiming certain Manson 7R24617, And it any answer in this 3q., having made pasia 2 res st o bond given and delivery proceeding Liability, ‘ 5 + 4.9 * Ourt that the TT Tye R ve DLs Nay e Judge Presiding, Dorman Thompson ¢ 0 Attorney To oY Plaintlir Zeb. V. Long Attorney for IrédeIt County, mT H ( } ; This Honorable Court adjourns Sine Die + e JudedVPresiding > tat. Judicilal In the S. uperior Court. North Caroline, | Before the Clerk, tredell C ountye Syllivan Company q } JUDGMENT, 4 Ballance ee Tis cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County , S tate of North Carolina, and being heard, dit appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was duly issuad an pyyos +O 5 ; the 22 nd day of December, 1921, and was served on the defendant on the on . ; : e3ra day of December, 1921, and that the plaintiff + * ~~ oOo in this cause on the fourth day of January, 1922 , aoe and neglected to file an answer within twenty days plaint or the return day mentioned in said summons, and th the amount demanded of the defendant is for a definite and fixed sum, being the amount due a threee notes after deducting the credits shan on said notes; and thal q 2s were secured by a transferring and delivering to the plat y th ndant stocl certificate No. 23 of the Merchants & Farmers Bank of Taylorsvil- 32 shares of the common stock of said Bank: therefore ordered: and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recovér of the defendant the sum of One Thousand “leven and 43/100 ($1011.43) Dol- interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the » until paid and that this judgment is a lien ock of the said B ank of Taylorsville, North Carolina, being bLificate No, 235, It is further ordered and adjudged that pledge of foreclosed and the said stock be sold, and to that end, public auction Carolina, to highest bi convey the same to the purchase r purchaser absolutely advertising the same for twenty days in some News Paper published Tredell County, and by posting a notice of said sale at the Court House Door of Tredell County and four other public places in the County of Iredell for twenty days prior to the sale, It is further ordered that said Commissioner sell said at Stock on Monday, March 13th, 1922 , at 12 o'clock, Noon, and out of the proceeds of said sale pay the costs of this action, and apply the ballance, so far as it Will go to the satisfaction of this judgment and pay any surplus to S» G, Earp. S “ald Commissioner shall report his Proceedings to the Court within ten days after date of sale, ; It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, Bal ‘“ a ‘ lance & § ullivan Company, be and it is hereby authorized to bid at said 8 ale end purchase said steak, It 1s further ordered and adjudged that the def | endant pay the costs of this action, This cause is retained for further orders, This February 6th, 1922; * a Ai 4 Ha:’tness' ahg epee egealsr oF y } j * FA 5 | MONDAY, MARCH 13th., 1922. No. 9 Statesville Lumber Co. Jury No. 1 after being sworn and vs empannelled for their verdict say R.M, Currant they answer the issues submitted as follows: lst, Did the plaintiff and defendant enter into the contract as alleged in the complaint ? Answer. YES. nd. Did the plaintiff over-pay the defendant as alleged in the complaint ? : Answer, YES. 3rd, Did the defendant commit a breach of s&id contract as alleged in the complaint 7? Answer. YES. 4th, What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the défendant 7? Answer, $1250.00. Na; 27 Boyce Lumber Co. { Jury No, 1 after being duly VS. § empannelled for their verdict R.M, Currant J answer the issues submitted a lst. Did the plaintiff and defendent enter into contract for the sale of certain oak lumber as alleged in complaint ? Answer, NO 2nd, Did the defendant commit a breach of the contra as elleged in thé complaint ? Answer, 3rd. What damage, h i < bled recover of the defendant ? Answer me It was moved and seconed by the Bar and ordered by the Court that the Wednesday, Thursday and Fridey's calendar be moved up to Tuesday, March 14th., 1922, and to dispose of the cases in +> u he order in which they come on the present printed calender. This Honorable Court adjourns until Tu March 14th,, 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A som Ose _ Judge Presiding. f { Mian TUESDAY, MARCH 14th., 1922, MONDAY, MARCH 18th., 1922 +> a In the Superior Court | oi March Ter 1922, : Tis Honorable Court convened Tuesday morning, M . As 1 = > ~ rel : One wee! Civil cases onl : Tredell County One wee, Civil c ve 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, for the dispatch of business, 2, North Catolin Superior Court begun and held in and No, 27 . Ty . : North Caroli Mog ¢ j Carolina, Motor Co. of Iredell, 5 North Carolina, on the lst. Moanday | a oc: { Continued by consent Monday in i 922, the same being the 13th day of N.V. Long when and where His Honor, J, BIS RAY, Judge Presiding, a 3 and P i ding 1e week M, Rimmer . nd Presiding for one week . Continued -” P,Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, ( Court the names ’ the following good and lawful ; ; o : Consent furors » this term f ne week, Civil cases only, : Tt ry cae y DH. Perry, Cmoanvwer VLOVOEL ox, A.B.~azenby, M.D. Ara Rit op a re i Continued Goodmen, A 1 1) loaninge FA,” James Sherrill, a MeDaniels, et al M,A,Beaver, J.Melvin Watson : ‘ returned as dead, Wy scale ferold “Watson th Soun ty Inowan Taelee T (i , q tne County. Grover Jacks, L,G,Knox, and A.B, Lazenby could not be found JD, Ora ; S No. 358 Di eats Brady Printing Co. vs Continued J,P,Burns excused by the Cour the a } 3 y 16 Court on the account and other causes, JeLe.Sherrill x: ae . oF lo. 46 =o \ 2 } vr a 4 e B.M, Wilhelm y Consent, ; + Sherrill Lumber Co.,et a} vs § Continued by consent. E.S,Goodin, et al I Lumber Co, : nee No, 49 Continued by Consent, J ms Chapvell vs Continued ; Hutton & Bourbonnais No, John H.P, Carter, and J.H. Johnson Continued by Conseny, pains adsha vOS Bradshaw VE Continued consent, Guy Bradshaw No. 18 Chas. E. Lichtenste3 e De J UTLYU vein No 61 Survéving memb ; rag firm of Pat Menten ae ae ae Se ern .& 09, : vs, Continued ca os P D.D + J.K,Morrison Grocery & vontinued by Consent, iy Produce Co, No. 62 No. 23 Ld Bickley Clothing Co, Rutland Garment Co 4 : a vs. Continued consent. vs, : 4 f.A.,Miller & Son W.W.Rankin Co, Continued by Consent, No, 63 is “°@ Steadman (Lee ~ Cpe - vs Continued frye 3 fOr Leg of m / pee e 22) ] | John Steadman | : TUESDAY, MARCH 14th., 1922, North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Merch Term, 1922, Continued It appearing to the Court that Frank Luttrell Grier, a has presented in open Court a license to practice law issued by 10, OO : Mooresvill ae the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina, dated January VS. JOTLY Lalu > Cara OLS T PR T mn PE A Oil 30th., A.D. 1922, and that the Court at the request of Hon. W.D. Turner, Attorney, administered to him the oath to support the Constitution of the State of North Carolina, the oath to support the Constitution of the United States, and the oath of an Attorney and Counselor at Law, It is therefore, onsidered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Frank Luttrell Grier be, and he is hereby admitted to the practice of the profession o 7 the Courts of the State of North Carolina, It is further ordered by the Court that a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread uxon the minutes of this Court, Mis March 14th., 1922. B : Neuf Gnas =e en eenee ul duly sworn and empannelled A answer the issues as these minutes, ; North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | “serch Term, 1922, ee ANE LLEG h verdict say they answer 5 se , sues aS spread on another page of these I, Frank L, Grier, do solemnly swear that I will support the constitution of the United States; so help me God 6 Frank L, Geier Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court this the 14th day of March 1922 , y N J. Bis Ray vury NO. 1 after being duly sworn and Jadge presiding and holding the a fe for their verdict say they answer Courts of the 15th Judg. Dist. the issues as spread on another page of these minutes, North Carolina, ) In the Buperior Court Iredell County. ) March Term 1922 I, Frank L. Grier, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to the state of North Carolina, an to the constitutional powers and authoritties which are oP may be established for the government thereof; and that I will endeavor to Support , maintain and defend the constitution of said state, not inconsistent with the constit&tion of the United Sctates, to the best of my knowledge and ability; so help me, God. 200) Tred D,! Grter! Proreln S orn to and subscribed before me of March, 1922 . North Carolina, ) Iredell County. ) I, Prank L, Grier, do swear th the practice of an attorney, acc ability; so help me, God, AA ainhacrit qa Yt E 1 supscr 1lodea > yA~/7 24 in open Court this the 14th day J. B is Ray ' “~Tudge presiding and holding the Courts of the 15th Judg,. Dist, In the Superior Court March Term 1922 at I will truly and honestly demean myself in ording to the best of my knowledge and ¢ Ul! Grier me in open Court this the 14th day of g and holding the > 15th Jud, Dist, North Carolina, In Superior @urt tredell County. . March Term 1922, Sterling Mills , ince vB ) ) ) ) ) Saginaw Mill ing Company. 1, ts the interpleader, Second National Bank of Saginaw Michigan, the owner of the proceeds of the draft, attached by the plaintiff in this action} Ans. Noe 2, What amount, if any, is interpleader entitled to recover of the defendant in this action? Ans. Nothing. 3, In what sum, if any, is the Defendant indebted to the plaintiff? Ans. $468.42 mw \‘| North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Sterling Mills, Incorporated} vs ) JUDGMENT. Saginaw Milling Company. ) This cause coming on to be heard at the March Tern, 1922, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, J. Bis Ray, Judge Preisiding, and a jury and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action-.was served upon the defendant by publication, and that warrant of attachement was issued in this case against the prop- erty of the defendant, and that notice of garnishment was issued upon the Peoples Loan and Savings Bankand that the proceeds of 4 certain draft drawn by the defendant on the Statesville Flour Mills, Incorporated and that no answer was filed in this case by the defendant, and it appearing to the Court further that the Second Nation- al Bank of Saquinaw, Mich, intervened in this action claiming to be the owner of said draft, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows:- 1. Is the interpleader, Second National Bank of Squinaw, Michigan, the owner of the proceeds of the draft, attached by the plaintiff in this action? Ans. No. 2nd. What amount if any is the interpleader entitled to recover of the defend- ant in this action? — Answer. Nothing. \ 3. In what sum, if any, is the defendant entittred, to the plaintiff? Anseer. $468;82. It is the-efore ordered, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover idgment of the defendant the sum of $468.82 and the costs of this action. Tt is further adjudged by the Court that judgment bé rendered against the Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, Garnishers, for the amount of the proceeds of eaid™ Graft » Said judgment to be discharged upon the payment into Court of an amount suf- 42 ficient to pay the principal, interest and costs of this judgment, the balance ree maining in the hands of said bank to be paid to John A. Scott, Jr. Attorney for the Interpleader as agent for the defendant. J. Bis Ray Judge Pre siding. The Interpleader moved that the verdict be set aside and a new trial had for errg; committed by the Court in the charge to the jury. Motion overruled and the inter- pleader excepted. Judgment. The Interpleader excepted and appealed to the Supreme Court, notice of appeal of given in open Court and further notice wanted a appeal bond in the.sum of $50.00 adjudged sufficient. Interpleader allowed 30 days from adjournment of Court within which to make and serve case on appeal. Plaintiff allowed 60 days thereafter within which to serve counter case of exceptions. J. Bis Ray, i ae ee Judge Presiding. Q@CG@CRDCESIC@@2G@ 3@@ @COCSSCBWDEBOBVOQBIOBDCCF No. 58 North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. March Term 1922. r M. Kennerly vs JUDGMENT, T. Gladden This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor J. Bis Ray and being heard and it appearing that the defendant failed to apnear and prosecute his appeal and by order + e Cc or he 2,01 the s a ‘ of th ourt the Court the said defendant was called by the Sherriff to come in and prosecute his appeal and failed to appear, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said appeal be dismissed and the cost be taxed against the Defendant by the Clerk, J. Bis Ray, Judge Presiding. 32.9800000000000000028 @9G9BSGA2.32039G090.200 No. 64 North Carolina , In the Superior Court. Iredell County. y March term 1922. J. H. Weston ) vs ) Mrs. Mary McLeliand. 90 JUDGMENT, This cause comi : ng on to be heard at this term of court before His Honor, J. Bis Ray, Judge Presiding, and being heard upon motior ° ing both plaintiff and defendant and it appe on of the attonneys represent aring that this cause is a proper one foF reference: 13 is therefore ordered and adjudged that p. P. Yulin, Esq., be and he is hereby It 18 appointed Refer a4 to find the facts and to determine the questions of law involved in said e an ee and as such Referee, he is authroirzed to hear the evidence in said caus and after hearing said case, he is authorized, empowered and directed to ren- cause, judgment in accordance with his findings in said cause, which judgment when der 4 dered shall be final, it having been agreed between the attorneys representing both render laintiff and defendant that said judgment when found by said Referee shall be final plain inding betwecn the parties to this suit. J. Bis Ray Judge Presiding. and b Tis March 14, 1922.4 red: Aeprore Weatherman Atte, for Plaintiff. Dp, L. Raymer and Lewis & ewis, Attorneys for defendant. @xQGVOWF? GISISIIIAVE @GGI99O3099.220030.28 No. 17. Boyce Lumber Co. ) vs ) JUDGMENT. J. H. Weston ) This cause coming on to be heard at this term before His Honor J. BIs Ray, Judge and a Jury , and the Jury having found did not enter with the contract alleged in the complaint. It is considered and adjudged that plaintiff recover nothing because of his said writ, J, Bis Bay Judge Presiding. @2@@QO GABE IABBOC @QOOQO@E@®IIDSIWIPES.2B22 No. 48 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, ) I ) redell County. ) Barch Term, 1922. Carolina Motor Company, vs Lime Cola Bottling Company and DGMEN T. E. T. James -m This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County and being heard before His Honor, J. Bis Ray, Judge Presiding, ant “* @ppearing to the Court that the parties to this suit have compromised their “'fferences, and agreed that the plaintiff shall take Judgment for the sum of Bight hundred and Forty-Three and 63/100 ($843.63) Dollars against the defendants: a* : 7 In the S‘uperior Court, It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that plaintiff, Caroling Mote No. 5 carolina, t S Sup North Company, recover of the defendants, Lime Cola Bottling Company and HE. T. James, tp Iredell ‘County f €3 March Term 1922 sum of Eight Hundred forty three and 63/100 (3843.63 ) Dollars, and that the defen. E,. M. archie dants pay the costs of this action. JUDGMENT. vs J. Bis Ray Judge Presiding. J. W, He Johnson 4 a hope ®. tae mis cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor J, Agreed: ts Ray and a Jury end being heard and the Jury having found the issues in favor Bis of the plaint {tts It is therefore considered that plaintiff recover of the Defendant the sum of Twenty-seven & 50/100 dollars, and costs of action to be taxed by the court. . J. Bis Ray No. F $ \ ; Judge tresiding. arolina {f North Superior Court ened Iredell County March Term 1922 po BEN tors CVA a) oMAYOMAYaY aaa) YWOCQDQI@DOGIBOOEOQ Henl iz | tock © WWAQQ2QQQLA2OQOGCO Henkel Craig Livestock Yompany YWOQWBOGEL No. 45 - 7 C pior North Garolina,)§ n S-uperior Iredell County 4 March his term of the Court upon the motion | = Leathers , Wood & Coe, Lo a ie the judgment heretofore rendered in favor 1 vs George Pappas, trading and ss as Bristol of the defendants plaintiff and against the defendants % W, Caldwell, t E, Lippard . oe doing business Corp. been considerec and +} om Ache a ist, Is the Defendant indebted to plaintiff, re was no excusable neglect on the part of the defendants or either . . } interest from Jan, 27, 192. therefore and adjudged that said motion be and the same T+ Le rs +U is further adjudged that the cost be taxed No, 45 c J. Bis Ray North Carolina, f In the S-uperior Court Judge Fr 14 ge esiding tae EC a ham 922 redell County, { March Term, 1922 bate leo Leathers, W ood & Company BBQABDI@SASADSAOQIO : vs ¢ QQQWSO7> GOSGBOIDSIAAO “eorge Pappas, doing business 1 and stybe name No, 37 a ne : 4, Jal Archie This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court of “redell vs ISSUES ne ounty, and being heard before His Honor, J. Bis Ray, Judge presiding, and 4 jury e. DIG Che sletntte? wesann } ° a tne plaintiff warrant the mules to be"straight and all right™ as z aie 1st, Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and if so in what amount: end the jury having answered the issue submitted to them, as follows: Ans, No Ans, $.251,10 and interest from 27 Jan, 1921. 2nd. W as It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover there a breact } r + | 1 of the warranty by the plaintiff as alleged by the of th er ) defendant ? € defendant the sum of Two Hundred Sixty Seven and 97/100 ($207.97 ede ae oe an ANs, No, d thet the defendant pay the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Srd, Is defendant indeb : ted to the plaintiff, if so in what amount? Ans. $27.50 ae ee iat 8S 3 4th. fe Pissramne: Is the plaintiff indeb I r Y ted to the defendant on his é i” in what amount ? ee Ans, Nothing, Yo, 74 North Carolina, Iredell County. Lena Moose Yan vs T. B. Lene two years next he 74 ry 4 7 2 “ : orth Carolina, 15th., 1922, In the S"upertor Court, March Term, 1922 a the plain preceeding the commencement of this action? defendant intermarry as alleged in the compan arriage to the plaintiff In the S uperior Court, March Term, 1922 of the Court before His a jury, and the jury having answered -esident of the S tate of North Carolina the commencement o is action? and Llaintiff ‘udp ‘, ; ‘ adjudged that the marriage between the ne is hereby declared null and void, Je Bis Ray Judge Presiding, Honorable Cour 3 vourt adjourns until Wednesday morning March Ss (Sica Soy 0% ' 7} % 9:30 o Clock, A.M, ag ze fres iding. Liff been a resident of the S tate of North Carolina 1Q def ‘e idant intermarry alleged in the come Nednesdey, March 15th., 1922, ™is Honorable Court convened Wednesday Morning, 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, No ‘ 41 William Osborne vs Bessie Continued Morrison Osborne No. 68 H, P. Sigman vs M.B.Sigme Continued, No. 59 Brookshire & Berry vs Statesville Lumber Co, Continued, This Honorable Court adjourns Sine Die. Judge ‘residing. G / ” (ers ‘CL . 4D et ~ 5 / ¢ ri a ROWAN COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, iy 2 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, to. Iredell County, | Before the Clerk, friond, W,L, tay “— JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFT, Ballance-Sullivan Company | L -VSe { — . : N a CE, Lazenby 3.G,Eerp 0 At a Superior Court, held in the Court House in Salisbury, Tis cause coming on to be heard upon the report and ae eo, on the 15th day of l"ebruary, 1922, Presont: Hon. J. Bis Ray, Judge, supplementel report of the sale of the Bank Stock Described in the ne ret ‘his action having been set for trial, called and tried had, complaint, filed by the conmissioner, and being heard, end it p 2 * } . q ow» ond the jury having answered the following issues: 1st, Was the plaintiff appearing to the Court thet said conmissioner, efter due adver injured by tne negligence of the defendant alleged in the complaint? tigement according to law, cid, on the 135th day of March, 1922, ! r £ £3 ¢ ’ the injury wilful and tanton ? Anoswer, "Yes", at 12 O'clock, Noon, expose to sale to the highest bidder, .tor the plaintiff entitled to recover of the cash, ot public auction, at the Court House door of Iredell County, Stato of North Carolina, said Bank Stock, when and where JM,Little Pa we eo « a , > 0 1ag . > 2g 3 L of Hudson & Hudson, Counsel for the of Al exonder County, N, C. become the last and highest for seid Bank 1g . a . 7 7} maf - > 7 plaintiff ac st, That the plaintiff recover of the defendant Stock at the price of One Thousand ond lifty-nine and no/100 ‘he 912) ? C26 wet +}, ina ps . . . 2 . S1O5¢ I 2° the sum o! with interest on said amount from Feby 13th, 1922, (1059,00) Dollars, and for the cost of this action to be taxod by the Clerk And it further appearing to the Court that said price —- the injury on account of which the above amount for said Bank Stock is fair and reasonable price therefor, and all is recovored was "W4ilful and wanton" the same is worth, ond said report of the commissioner has been that execution, issue first against the property of filed more than Twenty days, and that no exceptions has been filed the defendant, and if the same be thereto aor ony advanced bids has been offered for said Bank Stock: returned unsatisfied in whole or in part, that execution awoken , 7 ; , SORh20R ‘he st the person of the defendant as provided by law in such cases said sale of said Bank Stock to the said J,M,Little at the price of It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court thet J, Bis Ray $1059.00 be, and the same is hereby confirmed and ratified by the Juc eo Trest. er Court, ond the scid Commissioner, H,E. Lowis, is hereby ordered and North Yarolina, { { IN THE SUPERIOR court directed to twrn over said Bank Stock to the said J,M,Little absolutely } * Rowan County, tL, J.F.MeCcubb4 Pa and forever upon receipt of the purchase price, Voerall , ILNS jLerk & ayptanw ( , 9 erk SuperiLor Court, in and for the State and il i Nini ba eee . This April 3rd 1922 ounty aforesaid lo heraby ‘ gee ‘ . im ae » § nereby certif Vv the f oreroing to be a true copy of the t 7 , a H judgment in the above entitled action, as the a: Je. artness = ~ , ‘ 16g Same is talren from and Clerk or the puperlor “Court ° compared with the oriinal Iredell County, North Carolina, now on f ani = . ow on file and of record in this office, in Minute Docket / 20 <<, Ot pare 458, IN TESTIV North Carolina; | In the Superior Court, {f WHEREO] Toh » a » I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Iredell County, } Before the Clerk, Soa. of Galid Court, at office Salis ‘a e | ’ ) ce, in Salisbury, N.C,, this the Sth day of J.L.Sherrill and 3.B.Reece} PPR A» 1VBR, - a | JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT. I‘. | +“. Gwaltney t J. MeCubbins belie’ aki Tose eee ¢ This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of this ANLAL OL or the Superfor Court. ae and it eppearing that the plaintiffs and defendant have made a promise and that the plaintiffs takes a voluntary non-suit, that p1 It is therefore, considered, order and adjudged bg the Court action nntifife be non-suited and that they pay the cost of this on as taxed by the Clerk, This April 10th, 1922, + J, A,Hartness Clerk Superior court, North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | Before the Clerk, H.B,Ostwalt { -VSe- | C,H,Brown and A.G.Brom., | This cause coming on to be heard before J.A.Hortness, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County, North Carolina, on this the Srd day of April, 1922, and bing heard and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from the record in this cause that summons was issued in this action on the 23rd day of Feb,, 1922, returnable on the 6th day of Mar, 1922, and the same was personally served on the defendants on the 24th day of Feb., 1922, 1 as filed on the 25th day of Feb., 1922 end it further appearing to the Court that no answer has been filed by the defendants and that from the evidence produced, which is adjudged he Court to be satisfactory proof of this cause of action, that the is based on a promissory note in favor of said plaintiff and signed by the defendants, the terms of which note are set out in the complaint in this action, that there is due the plaintiff on said note the sum of $1500, ond interest thereon from Jan, lst., 1919; is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, C,H.Browm and A.G,Brown the s17™ ¢ £13 74 +} rhay - sum of 31500, with thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from and after Jan. 1st., 1919 until paid and the costs of this action as taxed by this Court, This Srd day of Ay Lori J,A,Hartness Clerk Superior Court, North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Ifedel1 County. | Before the Clerk, April 17th., 1922, Merchants «Farmers Bank of wooresville, N.C. Inc. SM. Hart. This cause coming on to be heard on this the 17th day of April, 1922, the same being the third Monday of said month, and being heard before z.4,Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, the Court from the evidence finds the following facts: That this is an action based upon a promissory note, under seal, executed py S.M,. Hart to the Merchants & Farmers Bank, Inc. of Mooresville, North Carolina; that the note for suit is for the sum of Five Hundred (3500. ) Dollars, dated June 8, 1920, and due and payable July 19, 1920, with interest from July 15th, 1920, payable semisannually; that the entire principal with interest from January lst, 1921, remains unpaid; that summons in this action with a copy thereof has been served upon the defendant before the first Monday in April 1922; that at the time of issuing Summons and a copy thereof a copy of the verified complaint was served upon the defendant and at the time of the service of summons that no answer has been filed in said actions It is, therefore, upon the foregoing finding of the facts, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, the Merchants & Farmers Bank, Inc, of Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina have and recover of the defendant the swn of %3500,00 with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent from January 1, 1921, until paid together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This 17th day of April, 1922, J. A. “artness Clerk Superior Court of Iredell BINVGISHGHIIO North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Cler, April 17th., 1922, Merchants & “armers Bank, Inc. | of Mooresville, N.C. 6 ) VS JUDGMENT, aa oe 4 Deli, Hart This cause coming on to be heard on this the 17th day of April, 1922, the same being the third Monday of said month, and being heard before 7,A,Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, the Court from the evidence finds the following facts: That this is an action based upon a promissory note, under seal, executed by 5,M,.Hart to the Mercants &% Farmers Bank, Inc, of Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina; that the note in suit is for the sum of Six Hundred and thirty- five (635,00) Dollars dated April 7th, 1919, and due and payable sixty days after date with interest from and after maturity; that the entire principal, with interest subject to the following credits is now due and unpaid: #35,.00 paid on September 4, 1919 and 575.00 paid on January 21, 1921; that summons in said action, with copy thereof, has been served upon the defendant and that service of summons with copy thereof was had ten days before the first Monday in April 19223 that at the time of issuing summons and copy therof a verified complaint was served upon the defendant at the + 2m f +4 ¢ i. Lime ot tne service of summons: hn 3 ce of summons; that no answer has been filed in said action: it 3 h £ - It is, therefore, upon the foregoing finding of facts, a 2a 0d e : eo ‘ considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, the Merchants & i armers Bank as af saic as aforesaid, have and recover of the defendant the sum of $ 71 ) LAG fe »665.00 with interest thereon at the legal rate until paid, together with the costs of tl nis action to be taxed by the Clerk; that the defendant is 1 + s entitled to the following credits on said note and this judgment, véaz: > oOo 00 aid on : ept moer 4 1919 and ? 75 00 pa d n Januar y el, 1 € ’ ‘v . 1 6 This the 17th day of April, 1922, J.A,Hartness Clerk Supericr Court of rlredell county. GacasaaseagaqangaqR0@a0 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Tredell County. 4 Before the Clerk, Statesville Lumber Co. | vs 4 ebb and D,L,Webb. 0 rT Y ve eg et Tis cause coming on to be heard before J,A.Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 24th day of February » D.L.Webb on the 25th day of Fepruary, 1922; and it appearing further that the return date in said summons was the first Monday in March, the same being the 6th day of “arch, 1922, and that tne defendants were notified that they should file a verified answer or demur to said complaint on or before the second Monday in March, 1922, the same being the 13th day of March, 1922; and it appearing to the Court that the defendants have filed no answer to this action, It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Statesville Lumber Company recover of the defendants J.W.Webb abd D,L,Webb, the sum of Five Hundred Dollars, ({500.00), with interest on said sum from the 7th day of August, 1920, until paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, Witness my hand, this the third Monday of April, same being the 17th day of April, 1922, J. A, 4artness Tlerk Superior Court, ‘ P ae TAaAnmmoOoO ® sat les : eee Sane ae a North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County.] Before the Clerk, Statesville Lumber Company | vs. | 5 I.W,Webb and .C,Moore, This J.A,Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was &ssued on the 24th day of February, that a verified complaint filed on said 24th day of Vepruary, 1922, and that summons was served on said J.W,Webb and W.C, oD Moore, on the 25th day of February, 1922; and it appearing further that the return date in said summons was first Monday in March, same being the 6th day I h, 1922, and that the de ints were notified that they should filr a verified answer or denmr to said complaint second Monday in March, 1922, the same being the and it appearing to the Court that the answer to this action, Ss, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the the Statesville Lumber Company recover of the defendants, of Five Hundfed Dollars ($500.00), 7th day of August, 1920, until action to be taxed by the Clerk no 7} hia 1, = ‘ = end, oh he third Monday of April, same April, 1922, » ae =i J-A,.“artness Clerk puperior North Corolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | Before the Clerk. F.L. Travis i VS. { Everett Troutmen { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing that the summons and writ of Claim ana Delivery was duly issued on the 6th day of March, 1922, and that the complaint was duly filed on the 18th day of March, 1922, and that the Sheriff of Iredell County under and by virtue of said writ of claim and delivery took into his possession the personal property decribed in said wri Claim and delivery and delivered same to the plaintif the value of said property is about $250.00, and defendant is justly due and owing the plaintiff the sum of 4130,85 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 24th day of October, 1921, until paid, amount is due a note secured by a chattel mortgage conveying the property described in the writ of claim and delivery ond the complaint, and that the defendant has failed to file an answer or demur to said compalint: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court: That the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of 5150.85 and interest hereon at the rate of per annum from 24th day of October, 1921, until paid, said judgment be and the same id hereby declared a specific lién on the property described in the chattel mortgage and compalint, and that H,E,Lewis is hereby appointed a commissioner of this Court and ordered and directed to séll said personal property at public auction at Bradys Cross Roads Shiloh Township, Iredell County, State of North Carolina, after advertising Same for 20 days as provided by law, and apply the proceeds of said Sale to the payment of this judgment and costs of this action. Srd, That the plaintiff recover of the defendant the costs of this action, This cause is retained for further orders. This April 17th., 1922, J,A,Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court. ; n Superior Court North Caroline, | n the Suverio : tr ‘nme the Tari: Tfedell County. } Before the Clerk, coring on to be heard before the Clerk and Court that the plal ff and defendant have their differences and that the defendant upon, Court before the ntary non-suit,. the Court that the iy a+ Vem e@ Tamtnoad OY tness ~uperlor Court Superior Court, Vr before me upon the verified a ew of which together with a copy of the summons was duly served upon the defendant, and it apnea ¢ = te 6 coed oe ee upon a note under seal for $250.00 dated Oct. 91 1920, and that defendant ONSWED ¢g fore adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant th um of 10 HUNDRED AND FIFTY ($250.) J M“ mud Lud AN ahh ie aowIVe DOLLARS princir and Mirta mens a as oes eee ee TWO AND 90/100 DOLLARS interest together with the costs to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court ‘artness , I Clerk Superior Court. t ces h e ap > oF = _ the ear day of May, 1922, he same being the First Monday in May, 192 . ACK e PEPPER ARIE REGEK uperior Court, 1922 Term, : wuverior Court begun and held in rolina, on the 10th Monday Ca J. 4 Aawt Tt A 5th day of May, A.D v Tn arle 4 ” m lursday morning, ¥ Tndere nresidingre \dge presiding, <> von teitor ts =e Ho, 1 State vs Robert Thurs day, UO C ONTRARY J i With Leave. HAVING “TATTITNG dad VING Continu OPERATING Continued under ATI Ls224 former ormer o on Ss Capia ce Pe Thureday, liay 18th., 1922, No, 31 State vs 4 Yayid Honeycutt STORE BREAKING \/Jak abe edt NT g Continued under former order, TA OMe PROMTUTITIIG JAR siuly d 4 RECEIV Laie TUT RECEIVING, Alias Vapias, - AY 'TOTIT ARTC\TTNI™ ’ UNI FUL AMOUNT Ng under former order, MOTTA TINA uf Volos 5 Defendant srthup Gaither Sci Fa and iO» 37 Gia’ DLALS . amr T TNO 7.7 ‘T i saan eo 1 VS wisdsd tN id yy. Contd invecac,. o nerrill lrazier NG AN Len Houston Sei Fa an , C3 4 oraz LETAL Us. AT ALIN Liisi li ¢ Defends mes into open Court and enters 4 plea of y Lt is dered and adjudged by the Court that the def > confined tn the common jail of Iredell + for term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS) and assigned to worl on the. public roads of said county for said period, without felon stripes. Yampbel) et et ING, Rer Mr Fare LAT Tapes JuaNi/ fy \CieI VING, ai . Yr order, under forme Pe ee > et et eo Se et Se et OE SE pe AON OM Ct ee cat PO ee Mapa dat Lnurs aay , MITR ACS WIR TNA Defendant comes into open Court and enters a nlea of cuilty of manufacturing liquor, : Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that he defendant be confined in the common jail of Tredell County for a term of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period without felon stripes, T TOTTIO} _ U ~-@ TVING AUTO WHIL NDER THE INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR, Yefendant comes into ope) and enters a plese muilty as charged - f£ indictment, ; ordered and adiudge r the Court that mdant be confined in 1 _ common jail of ount T+ . uv 0 2 J Fh bs “a + Je ened to work o1 he |] "needa aY Ol ee nt be chanced t) by t 1% throu uw ~% ~* + orcib e } Lox 7 . ee c — +}, vy =a + ed by the Court WNMON NAVI lent of th 16 pon paymeny reward for the stolen eing (320,00, YPatriand h OC wads t Friday, May 19th., 1922, This Honorable Court convened Mag 19th., 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.l., No ° Ta State vs Thomas Owens Cloaninger v ioover ee eet Dt <n NE AE EE EE RE pee OE ee pe ee pee NE A pe ee for the dispatch of business TO appear and show good behavior, Defendant appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, The forfeiture heretofore made at January Term, 1922, is hereby ordered to be striken out, upon payment of costs of Sci Fa, Cost paid. TQ SHOW 90D BEHAVI OR, Defendan AD] ared and showed good behavior. So 1é former order, The forfeiture J 5 + +» +417 4 rdered to be s en out, Svat mn QQTyAyi7T eee a efendant Continued aes TAT AT Ter Oo LING ye Aud MUL Bia i i It appearing to the 4 hat at van, term, 1922 defendant was found ; +7 + a? Atanac’ ae 5 Jar AL ae yicawnd a2 POS Lilp, iad m rbterace ) sNapPrtrr a harce VY) oraver for Ji Va suo i a ee peas ce wieaae continues J4Ge ent = Aw VLLU Liss’ at COoSt.e hererore the we G arn7on Sel Iie Luts @ + “~iLty Trayotr © BULL vw? ul y Lied for ~AAan ony t lta fendant ) uy 4 a dead dS y ote whe abe on the LJ 2 eect a T sppep pring > e \ p - from defendant is ring ir serious rup therefore 1 ; ordered 3 , | nw * cdefenda for Ire a. ; case 1id defendant ot , work on roads, mI WD RECEIV ING, : : oT TT T A . HOUSE BR NG, LARCENY AN Hib i J wis Defendant ‘enters a’ plea of guilty as charged in bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court thet the defendant be confined in the oe tie jail of itt c WOW 7 Iredell County for a eee’ of TWEL 12 pega end assigned to work on the Sota roads of sac county for said peri od sithoat felon stripes. Wey 19th., 1922. ie SO ARNAL KNOWLEDGE OF FEMALE CHILD UNDER 14 SARRVING CONCEALED WEAPON : State ND OVER Ll! co OT AGR ei ente ylea of ilty of carrying vs Ber i eat Pe aes efendant ent eee ete Spaeth. ~ Nefendant in open ‘Court through his counsel neenled weapon as charged in bill of incictment, percy Sherrill e+ ut mn Ss em owan % - waives the finding of bill and enters a plea of on "= rdere a 7 he 3 XT } C 17° 12 Nn WOALVS y £5 : rt is ordered and adjudged by the vourt thet the guilty of an assault on female, aatensans ve ee ain the common Jail weet Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that ogi of nee 30) nee ees prayer for judgment be con tinued for two years < wore oo ae ect <png sete eran eon ae ao upon payment of costs in this action as taxed ee teeies ot amnteney Ee Le by the Clerk of this Court, the xpirat ( sentence y Vil' nT No. 60. a ee | LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant insists on contin his case and No, 1 after being Vay it appearing ae the cow alle goth »_ be atolen their verdict say they has returned to the home of the - al This utc ce. ae ee case is continued with recommendations to Pn eee merugage Judge af next term that defendent be given no xf indictment, Lag the Court tha the jeil of Gredell : end assigned county for said + : 4% credit for time in jail. tT 7 lax<r oO 4 ay, May 25rd, 1 et et a ee RE CE ee 922 Jmke MANUFACTURING U0! It appearing that judgm been entered arainst Ernest surety R,H. Kennedy at January Ter since thet time the defendant Ernes has bee en and sentenced 18 the roads of said county. Therefore, it is ordered the Court that this judgment striken out upon payment of cost of Sei Fa, » surety. Ne et AS ed pee OE ea oe eee ct od amt acte AUT m ary NURS PF fay fh / 4, Wai The defendant being in open Court. The suggests that defendant ts unable to pl ead of Ge ener and that the Court app her an rete The C ourt on said caaaeetit of the Solicitor ts Dorman Thompson to represent her in ake ON e Thereupon a jury being duly srorn an empannelled their verdict answer the following issues lst, Does the defenda time, sufficient mental move defense to the bill Answer: no an W ary yor ont. efendant entered in two cases and prayer for judgment h the County: Recorders zs Iredell County {tt further ppear ing that miles Sant « a caeanal a P dant was convicted April 24th, és Lee 2or having in his possession one-h2: A e OS 10 t} er case and that Ade scorders' Court prayed shat + Pawmnprl 4+ iDOVe Yrezerredad tO. ee eet nt pet ect OS gs et er et pet pet jant excepted to the Court end appealed North Carolina, { In the Superior Court, rdered t “9 Iredell County. | May term, 1922. ence in ders ' S . C Be : State of North Carolina | 0 redell v JUDGMENT, ass igned to i Rosa +edirell said period. naa ounty Recorders! oe sray sm a a 74 ee antd Upon the finding of the jury to the isse affirma tively Sourt was two years in ths tae at Oe eee ‘ounty of the defdndant's plea, the Court commits the defendant to the > years in t common ja: Iredell Count} Asylum for the Criminally Insane at Raleigh for retention and and assirned ge ae ‘4 ae ; - “is Signed to on the publie roads of said county for said pertod, eer af ae tre atment until she be discharged by law. t { , x | J. Bis Ray wudge Presiding. 2 No, 49 State vs Fred Claywell ASSAULT WITH DRADLY WEAPON, “efend iants a ttorney comes into open Court and makes et mie C ithéraw ¢ appeal from County Recorders! Court to this Cour hich moti Ss a i by for the State. IS 4a cokemen ea ee Solicitor fey ene eee. S ordered, adjudged and deereed by ania macs hat this case be remanded back to the County ae ers’ Court end that he obey the orders of said wourt as now stend against him for $15,00 fine and cost of action as taxed by the Clerk of said Court, ee AE AT EE pet ole ee”, , oA Friday, May 19th.; 1922. THE MAY TERM OF COURT, 1922 whe @ TO HIS HONOR, J. } AY, JUDGE PREOLD Jury have passed on all sills 1at have come before us, We visited the jail b; committee, we nd $2. ary condition, We recommend that colored Court house, and find it in sanitary condition, ommittee, we found Twenty-eight prisoners, lored, We found well cared found every thing in well cared for. We found ite females, Seven colored farm, Ke red clover, Ten acres Monday, Mey 2and., 1922, Second week, “ay Term, 1922, North Carolina. } In the Superior May Term, 1922, Tredell County. | Second week for Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolin: 10th Monday after the 1st Monday in March, 1922, the 1sth day of May, B.D, 1922, when and where His Honor, Judge presiding, for the 15th Judicial District, is present syresiding this the second week for civil cases, M.P,Alexander.the High Sheriff of Iredell County, returned into open Court the names of the following good 2 _ e8 2 > a9 CAaRANA & Ve we men to serve as juror: F 1is yur t second week for A, Thomas, mn @r £ <P 7.7 T .S,Godfrey, J.L.! * oe Sie bin S,Brom, and J,F,”’arlton. matiaipPrner revurne< Upon motion of the Bar ail civil gages cases non-contested Sadie Scott, vs : ISSUE. Raxter Scott. j 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. 2, Did the defendant commit adultery 4s alleged in the compla int? Ans. Yes. 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for two years next proceeding the filling of the complaint? Ans. Yes. North Carolina, SUPERIOR COURT TERM, 1922. Iredell County. DECREE FOR DIVORCE. vs ) ) Sadie Scott, ; Bexter Scott. ) This cause coming on Bor hearing at this term of the court before His Honor, Biss Ray Taeee; and jury and the jury for their a ing answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintil a and found that the defendant has comitted acts of adultery 46 alle ge in her complaint: ds of It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the bon ndan matrimony, existing between the plaintiff, Sadie Scott and the oo 5 eet Baxter Scott, be and the same is hereby disolved and the parties be and they are hereby divorced. Judge LEE in 15 Judicial Dis. el fe eek el) ion Ores rs Cee ee sone 9 e ES ICS SORT Monday, May 22nd, 1922. Second week, May term, 1922, No. 15. State of North Carolina, In the Superior Court. County of Iredell May Term, 1922. Henkel Craig Live Stock Company 7 ae ) JUDGMENT. G. %. Caldwell and Mrs. L. L. Lippard. ) This cause coming on for hearing, and being heard, by his Honor J. Bis Ray, judge, at May Term, 1922, of the Superior Court of Iredell Co. upon motion of defendant, Mrs. L. L. Lippard, for relief under C. S. Section 600, to set aside the judgment rendered by his Honor, Judge Harding, at May Term, 1919, and, upon motion to strike out the judgment rendered at March Term, 1922, overruling said motion and denying the relief sought under said section 600 of the Consolidated Satutes, the Court finds the following facts: That the summons was issued September 14, 1918, and was duly ser- ved on the defendant Mrs. L. L. Lippard on September 16, 1918, that plaintiff filed a verified complaint prior to Junuary Term, 1919, that is to say on November 15, 1918, upon two promissory notes for $275 each, which are not copied in the complaint, and upon which, it is admitted by plaintiff, the said defendant, Mrs. L. L. Lippard Was an endorser “Without recourse "; that at January Term, 1919, no answer was filed, and at May Term, 1919 no answer was filed, and judgment was then taken by default final; that a little while after service of the summons, the defendant informed her husband about process having been read to her and that he then went to Catawba county ( the parties at that time residing in Wilkes county) and there found that Mrs. Lippard had been joined with him as a defendant in an action in said county of Catawba ; that the said defendant, thru mistake, concluded that the summons herein read to her was avout a litigation in Catawba county, not in Iredell County; that the said defendant did not learn of her mistake until several months had elasped after the rendition of said judgment by Judge Harding, and she then employed counsel to represent her and to seek relief from said judgment which haa been rendered by default; that the judgment and ruling denying the relief sought was signed at March Term, 1922, in the absence of said defendant and her counsel; that neither she nor her counsel had actual knowledge of notice, of the establishment or of the holding of said March Term, 1922; that in the year 1913 T. E. Lippard, husband of said defendant, purchased from one Ecwards a certain tract of land containing about 64% acres, on which C. B. Rufty held a first mortgage to secure a payment of a bal- lance of $500.00 due him, at the price of $1100.00 said Lippard then assaming payment of said mortga e; that said Lippard, thereafter, made payments on said Rufty note and mortgage, reducing said debt to £250.00 and some interest; that on October 17, 1918, said Lippard and his wife Mrs. L. L. Lippard, conveyed said tract of land (except 132 acres there- of) to G. W. Caldwell, a defendant herein, at the price of $1100 said Caldwell assuming payment of the Rufty Mortgage, paying said Lippard $300 in cash and executing to him a mortgage to secure two notes for $275.00 each; that the defendant, Mrs. L. L. Lippard was made on ac- count of her being named as a payee in said notes; that the said lands were sold uner the Rufty mortgageand the plaintiff, became the pur- chaser at the price of 3276; that plainiiff, according to admissions its 2 pce 1 Sagittal sold and conveyed the said land at the ou P * . i sock tauins motions of said defendant, Mrs, L. L. € Wherefore, the court concludes that th defendant, irs. L. L. Lippard, of nonlia ‘ity fauies of tee i hi ment "Without Recourse" constitutes, to say ihe least, a eri tortous defense to the action ; that the mistake and negligence of the said de- sete oe = rt and prosecute her defense, and the failure ier counse ° é Term, 1922, were excusable. serene Rene ees Rey Seeee oe ee It is, therefore on motion o < sel for said defendant, pln $e Mahle ie por err et a: Te oe ment of the undersigned at March Term, 1922, and the Tact ey daraait signed by his Honor Judge Hardin at r Ain. Sevens, Gitiken ons. Es May Term, 1919, be, and the same Lippard, are made J. Bis Ray Judge Presiding. Henkel Craig Livestock Co., ( VB ) G. W. Caldwell and Mrs. L. LLIppard ) To the foregoing finding of @act and to the Supreme Court. Notice of epoeni’ txten ii ones aeek eee bond fixed in the sum of $40 adjudged sufficient. "Fis Gear aate ca The Court sets a case On appeal to the Supreme C ° s aptkee to set acide badanent ourt the statement of summons; Complaint The judgment of Term 1922 and the affidavit used as the trying of tbe Lae om waren he proper and proper statement of case on appeal, i 1ud i Mag inding of facts and judgment. » including this curneenmnieeslitintts I a. _Judge Monday, May 22nd,1922, : Second week, May term, 1922. 4] In the Superior Couwrt h Carolina ) Nort ° At chambers in Statesville.. Iredell County. A. Hartness ) James ORDER reviving judgment as to R. N. vs R. N. Hackett and B. F. Long Hackett and continuing the rearing z as to B. F. Long. This cause coming on to be heard at chambers in the City of Statesville nN. c before the undersigned judge of Superior Court presiding and hol- ding the courts of the 15th Judicial District, and it appearing to the court from the return of t..e Sheriff of Wilkes county, upon the notice is- sued in the above entitled action, that the defendant R. N. Hackett was duly notified to appear before the undersigned Judge at Chambers in Salis- pury on May 12th, 1922, and show cause, if any he had, why execution should not issue on the judgment described in said notice; and it further appear- ing that said cause was at said time continued to be heard at qmambers in atntesviiis; at 12 o'clock M., on May 18th, 1922; and it furthe’ appear- ing that the said defendant R. N. Hackett failed to ap ear at chambers in Salisbury, and now fails to appear and show cause why executban should not issue upon the judgment aforesaid; and it further appearing to the sati.faction of the Court that said judgment has not been satisfied, but is still due and unpaid: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that said judgment be and the same is hereby revived, as to the defendant R. N. Hackett, to tree end that execution may be issued on said judgment against the said defendant rR. N. Hackette Upon motion of the defendant B. F. Long this cause as to said defendants rp. F, Long is continued to be heard before me at chambers in Statesville N. c. on May 27th, 1922, said continuance being without prejudie to the rights of plaintiff and defendant B. F. Long, but in no wise to effect the order reviving this judgment as to defendant R. N. Hackett. This 18th day of May, 1922, J. Bis Ray Judge Sunerior Court presiding and hofding courts of the 16th Jud. Dis. No. 57 North Carolina, I-edell County. In the Superior Court. May 22nd, 1922. J. H. Weston, ) ze vs JUDGMENT. Mrs. Mary McLelland ) This cause coming on to be heard before P. P. Dulin, Referee, on May 15th, 1922, and after hearing the testimony and argument of counsel, it is adjudged that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of P 466.34 together with interest from Juanuary 3lst, 1920, until paid, an the costs of this action. P. Pp, Dulin Referee. No. Carolina, In the Superse*. Court. Iredell County. May term, 1922. J. H. Weston ) ; vB ) JUDueMENT. Mrs. Mary McLelland ) This cause coming on to be heard at this May term of Iredell Super= ior Court, 1922, before His Honor, J. Bis Ray, Judge Presiding, and al ing heard, and it appearing to the court that P. P. Dulin, Esq. = : fore appointed referee in this cause has heard said cause and ha ; e . to this term of court his judgment, and it appearing from said fu — that said referee finds that the defendant, Mrs. Mary McLelland, is al debted to the plaintiff, J.H. Weston , in the sum of $66.54 with i erest thereon from January 31st, 1920, together with the costs@ ac e It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover 0 the defendant, the sum o/ $66.34 , with interest thereon from ort Slst, 1920, and the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk. J. Bis Ray. Judge Presiding. @@2@Q2GOAIAOB0E @AGGABAOGOOE wo Oss iO mo folate { / oT _2 mmm memento Monday, May 22nd, 1922. Second week, May term, 1922. Noe. 79 North Carolina In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Bickley Clothing Co. vs tT. A. Miller, trading JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUIRY. and doing business, under the firm name and style of T. 4. Miller & Son. This cause coming on to be heard on the records and pleadings and it appearing therefrom that the defencant has been duly served with summons and has filed no answer cr demurrer to the complaint, although the time for filing such pleadings has elasped; and it further appearing from the pleadings that this action is brought to recover the value of the goods, wares, and merchandise sold by the plaintiff to defendant, as set out in the schedule and invoices attached to and made a part of said com- plaint: Whereupon, it is considered vy the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the value of said goods, wares and merchandise and to that end, it is ordered by the court that an inqui y be had by a jury at the next term of this court, (or as soon thereafter as the same can be brought to the attention of the court) to ascertain the value of said goods, wares and merchandise. Thereupon this cause is continued for further proceedings. This the llth day of April, 1922. J. A. Hartress C. Se C« North Carolina, In the Superior C ourt. Iredell County. May Term, 1922. Bickley Clothing Co., ) vs ) ISSUE. T. A. Miller & Son. ) — First, Is the defendant in debt to the plaintiff, if s0, in what Ans. £275.50 with interest from July lst, 1921, until paid. No. 79. North Carolina, Iredell County. in the Supevier Geurt- May term, 1922. Bickley Clothing Co. ) vs ) JUDGMENT T. A. Miller & Son. ) This cause coming on to be heard at erior court, before His Honor J. Bis Palo Pig Pres Pring oe “a it appearing to the court that judgment by default and inquir was inianea in this cause by the Clerk of Superior Court on the llth da oe A 22 the inquiry instituted at this term of court before the ones . i” and that the said jury by their verdict having found that the a is indebted to the plai tiff in the s & on from February lst, 1921, until aid. = een Shae eee eee WHEREUPON, it is considered and ord | ered by the tiff recover of the defendant the sum of $275. BO un teen a. from the lst. day of February, 1921, until of this action, ‘to be taxed by the Clerk of this bs <p With the costs yg. Bis Ray Judge Presiding. Monday, May 22nd, 1922. Second week, May Term, 1922. NOe B06 North Carolina, In the Superior Court. tredell County. tropical Paint & Oil Co. | vs { JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUI®Y. p. B. Stearns i This cause coming on to be heard on the records and pleadings and it appearing the refrom the pongh cos has been duly servedw ith a jled mO answer or demurrer to the complaint, al = gummops , 024 + tme or filing such pleadings has elapsed; and it fure- ther appearing from the pleadings that this action is brought © recover the value of goods, wares, and merchandise sold by the plain- tiff to defendant, as set out in the schedule and invoices attached to and made & part of said complaint: WHEREUPON it is considered by the court that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendant the value of said goods, wares, and mer&han- dise and to that end, it is ordered by the court that an inquiry be had by a jury at the next term of this court (or soon hereafter as the same can be brought to the attention ofthe court) to ascer- tain the value of said goods, wares, and merchandise. Thereupon this cause is continued for further proceedings This the 17th day of April, 1922. J. A. Hartness Ge Oe Ce North Carolina, In the Superior Court Tredell County. May term, 1922. Tropical Paint & Co., ) vs ) SSUE. D. B. Stern ) First, is the defendant in debted to the plaintiff, if so, in what sum? Ans. $1,500.08 with interest on same from the 25th day of July 1921, until paia. No. 80. North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. May term, 1922. Tropical Paint & Oil Co. ) vs ) JUDGMENT. D. B. Stearns ) This cause coming on to be heard at this the May term of Ire- dell Superior Court, before His Honor, J. Bis Ray, Presiding Jw, and a jury, and it appearing to the court that judgment by default and inquiry was entered in this cause by the Clerk of the Superior Court on the 17th day of April, 1922, the inquiry instituted at this term of the court before the court and a jury, and that the jury by their verdict having found that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1500.05 , with interest thereon from the 25th day of July, 1921, until paid: Whereupon, it is considered and ordered by the Court that tthe plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $1500.05 with int erest thereon from the 25th day of July, 1921, until paid, together pag costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of this ourt. J. Bis Ray Pi Judge Presiding. @@@QWOLUGBORO@OOOS @G@CO@WX " oxaXa a a 4 / aes, TiO 7 m0 lies we: asenegeapasinnemn~cuiiise esabiidbaoaec tsa cinta om ‘Monday, May 22nd, 1922. Second week, May term, 1922, No. 78. North Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court. Harsh & Chapline Shoe Company vs T. A. Miller, trading and doing business, under the firm name and style of T. A. Miller & Son. JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUIRx. This couse coming on to be heard on the records and pleading, and it appearing therefrom that the defendant has been duly served with summons and has filed no answer or demurrer to the complaint, although the time for filing subh pleadings has elasped; and it further appearing from the pleadings that this action is brought to recover the value of the goods, wares and merchandise sold by the plaintiff to defendant, as set out in the schedule and invoices attached to, and made a part of said complaint: Whereupon, it is considered by the court that the i of the defendant the value of said goods, wares, and oc. to that end, it is ordered by the court that an inquiry be had by a jury at the next term of this court ( or so soon thereafter as the same can be brought to the attention of the court) to ascertain the value of said goods, wares and merchard ise. Thereupon this cau for further proceedings. - se is continued This the llth day of April, 1922. S. C. No. 78 North Carolina, ) Iredell County.) In the Superior Court. May term, 1922. Harsh & Chapline Shoe Company, ) vs ) £8 5 0 B, ) T. Aw Miler First, Is the defendant in debt to the plaintiff if so, in what sum? Ans. Yes, $452.21 with interest from 2nd day of July 1921 until paid e North Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court. May term, 1922. Harsh & Chapline Shoe Co. ) vs ) J uD t T 7. A. Miller ) GuES ft. This cause coming, on to be heard at thi £& s the May ter — a before his Honor, J. Bis Ray, Judge Seenaitaa. egg Te cage tag Bedligee ——: that wdgment by default and inquiry was ? ; rk o e Superior Court on the 1 pn 7 instituted at this term of the court wetene tke aa jury, and that the said jury by their verdict having found that the de- fendant is indebted to the plaintiff from 2nd day of February, 1921, ak rs om 05 Verne See eee Whereupon, it is considered and ordered by th tiff recover of the defendant the sum of $432.21, with intosunt al from the 2nd day of Februar 1921 ae this abtion, to be cae be se paid, together with the costs ——__J+. Bis_Ray Judge Presiding. BYIVIRIVIID @22+2QOGBOGE No. 61. North Carolina, In the Superior Court. tredell County. May term, 1922, cIntire Nelia M ISSUES. vs L. Ee McIntire Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as allegedin the complaint? Answer. Yes. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes8-. Did the defendant curse and abuse the plaintiff and offer such indignities to her as to render her condition intolerable and life burd- ensome a8 alleged in the complaint? Answere Yes. North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Hay term, 1922. Jelia McIntire ‘ ae JUDGMENT. L. E. McIntire § This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor J. Bis Ray, Judge presiding and a jury and the jury having answ- ered theissues a5 follows, towit: Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer, yese Has toe plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer, YeS-. Did the defendant curse and abuse the plaintiff and offer such in- dignities to her as to render her condition intolerable and life bur- densome as alleged in the complaint? Answer, YeS8Se It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff Be and she is hereby granted a divorce from bed and board from the de - fendant. J. Bis Ray Judge Presicing. rn his Honorable Court adjurns Sine 4 A 5 .. Ds sae eee ao] fey ies ivel, elie * ee - ~ ~ ne Minute 19 C a1r€ he v 4 v forth © arolins, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, rirst National Bank of S~tatesville vs { JUDGMENT, J, W. Webb and W, C, Moore 4 This cause comin: on to be heerd on this the 3rd, Monday of June, 1922 and being heard before James A, Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Ire. dell County, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff procured 4 summons against the defendants to be ussued on the 3rd day of May, 1922, ree turnable on the 14th, day of May, 1922, and cased the same, together with a copy of the complaintin this action, to be served on each of the defendants on May 5, 1922, and it further appearing that this is an action for a breach of an express contract, on the part of the defendants, to pay & sum of money fixed by the terms of the contract, towit, $800.00 with interest from Merch 10th,1920, at the rate of 6% per annum, until paid, as evidenced by the written promiss ory note of defendants, and it further appearing that the defendants, and each of them, failed to appear and file an answer or demur to the verified complaint duly filed, a copy of which was served on each of the defendants on May 5th,1922, and still fail and neglect to appear and file answer or demur to said complaint, It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court, that the plain tiff recover of the defendants the sum of $800.00, with interest thereon from March 10th,1920, at the rate of 6% per annum, until paid, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This judgment to in no wise effect or impair the collateral security held by the plaintiff for the payment of said debt, This June 19th,1922, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Vourt, AQQCOCQCBVES@LE a OXaXa AGeG North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Tredell County, Before the Clerk. H. H. Yount trading and doing business under the firm and style heme of Yount Motor Company JUDGHEN T, vs R. A. Lackey, B. L. Millsaps and P, H, Mason ee ae ND Me MF Sree ee ee me? Me re This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Cler M K of the S uperior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina, and it appeare ing to ; the Court that the defendants and each of them was duly served by per~ sonal servise of summons in this action on the 3rd, day of Mey , 1922, and that complaint was filed in the office of the Cierk of the Superior Court on the lst, day of May,1922 , the date of the issuing of the summons, and that more then twenty days has elapsed since the filing of the complaint and the return day as set out in the sunmons, and that tho defendants have failed to file and answer or demur to said complaint, and that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff by note, in the sum of Six Hundred and Twenty-seven ($627.00) dollars end interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 2lst, day of November, 1921 until paid: It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of Six Hundred and Twenty Seven and no/100 627,00) dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of six percent per annum from the 2lst, day of November, 1921 until paid, and that the defendants pay the costs of this action. This June 19th,192°, J- A, Hartness Clerk S uperior Yourt, North Cerolina In the Superior Court. Iredell County, June 19th,1922, C, Me S teele, H. 0. Steele, A. P. “teele, and F. F, S teele, trading and doing bus~ iness as Je%. S teele & S ons, Plaintiffs, ve JUDGMENT. J. B, Owens, trading and doing business as the Empire Floor and Wall Tile Company end as J» B. Owens Continuous tunnel Kiln ¢ Company, Defendant, This cause coming on to be heard before J+ A, Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on the third Monday in June,1922, same being the 19th, day of June,1922, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was duly issued on the 28th, day of Merch, 1928 , and returned by the Sheriff of Iredell County, indorsed, "Search and inquiry made, defendant not to be found in Iredell County." And it appearing further to the Court that @ warrant of attachment was ‘ssued against the property of the defendant on 1d aie dey of March, both summons and warrant of attachment being returnable sa pefore the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the Sth. day of May 1922 » and it appearing further to the court that publication of said summons ’ and notice of warrant of attachment was duly made as required by law, in the Statesville Daily, &@ newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina; and it appearing further to the court that a notice of garnishment was duly served on the Atlantic Marble and Tile Company by the Sheriff of Mecklenburg County on the 30th, day of March, 1922, requiring said Atlantic Marble and Tile Company to appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Vourt of Iredell County at 12 o'clock M., on the 17th, day of April,1922, and answer upon oath what it owed the defendant at the time of said attachment; and it appearing further to the Court that said Atlantic Marble and Tile Company owes the defen- dont the sum of $1775380 ; and it appearing further to the Court that plaintiffs filed a verified complaint in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court on the 20th, day of April,1922 ; and it appearing further to the Court that the defendant filed not answer to said complaint within 20 days from the return date set out in the summons and has never attempted to file any answer: Now, therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court thet plaintiffs are entitled to judgment against the defendant by default and inquiry, and this cause is hereby transferred to the Civil issue docket of the Superior Court of Iredell County, that the amount due the plaintiff by the de- fendant may be determined by a jury at the next term of the said Court upon an issue submitted to them, It is further considered, ordere% and ajduged by the Court that the judgment obtained in this action is a lien on the amount in the hands ofthe Atlentic marble and Tile Company and due the defendant, from the 50th, day of March,1922, and judgment is hereby rendered against the said Atlantic Marble and Tile Company for the amount determined by ‘he jury to be due the plaintiffs to be discharged upon the payment into this Court of the amount of $1775.80, same being the amount due the defendant by said Atlantic Marble and Tile Company. “itness my hand this the 19th, day of June,1922,. J. A, Hartness erk Superior vourt, QI@QG@BIOGIAVGG@O CQQQQQVIGEBAGZOELO i Clete Boma lf F 24 | North Carolina, |} In Justi¢e Court, Ifedell County.!} Before W.J.Lazenby, J.P. Statesville, Towmship. T,.3.Conger 4} VS j JUDGMENT. F,T,Burke | This cause coming on to be heard, before the undersigned Justice of the Peace, and being heard, the Court finds as fatts' and adjudges; 1. That the notce of action and of the issuing of the summons and warrant of attachment, stating the names of the parties, the amount of the claim and in a brief way the nature of the demand, and requiring the defendant to appear at the time and place named and answer or demur to plaintiff's complaint, has been duly published as the law directed. 2, That the summons and warrant of attachment issued in the action have been duly served by said publication, 3, That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $140.62, with interest on \)110,62 from August 6, 1920, until paid, and interest on 330,00 from January 20, 1920, until paid, same being due the plaintiff by reason of the defendant's having for value received endorsed and transferred to the defendant two notes, one executed by Lester Scott on 19th day of January, 1920, for 330,00, another for 5110.62, executed by Dock Springs on the 6th day of August, 1920, It is therefore considered and adjudged that plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $140.62, with interest on $110.62, from August 6th, 1920, and with interest on (330,00, from January 19th, 1920, together with the cost of this action, said cost being $5.35; and it further considered and adjudged that thie judgment is a lien upon the real estate of the defendant, F,T,Burke, levied on by the Sheriff in this action. Said real estate lying in Statesville Towmship, Iredell County, fronting on the Mocksville Road, adjoining the lands of J,A,Davidson, S.A.Fowler and others, being the identical lands formerly owned by the late H. Burke. For a fuller description see the title deed of F,T. Burke duly recorded in the Register of Deeds Office for Iredell County. It is further considered and adjudged that plaintiff is entitled to execution to be issued to the Sheriff, commanding him that out of said lends or real estate so levied upon, that he Satisfy this judgmengs together with the costs, ftncluding execution and sale thereunder, This 27th day of June, 1922, W. Je Lazenb 5 ; usStice o @ Freace, MONDAY, JULY Sist., 1922. ete North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1922, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolina, on the Sth. Monday before the First Monday in September, 1922, the same being the Slst day of July, A.D. 1922, when and where His Honor, 1T.B.Finley, Judge presiding, is present and presiding and the Hon. Hayden Clement, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, ll. P, Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: J.D, Patterson, li,G,Sloan, J,P,frazier, E.J.Troutman, W.C.Austin, WR, Eawards, J,B.Freoze, I,A.McLain, B,M,Stevenson, E,J,Stack, C.Fulp, John WW, Clark, ‘.C.Eidson, H,O,Steele, Benjamin Stewart, A.M.Gabriel, J.P, Wiggins, C.B.,Hill, D.,H.Perry, C.L,Mayhew, W,T,Nicholson, T,A,Sunmers, J.H. Pope, C.T.McNeely, W.M.,Horn, R.B, York, E,D,Oliphant, J.vi,Mills. W.R. Chester, Jeff Wallace, J,L.Goodman, \.F,Wilson, J.R,Baity and H.C,Ervin were returned"not to be found in Iredell County, and W.F. Orren returned sick with Doctors vertificate and C,Robert Johnston was excused by the Court on the account of business affirs,. The following good and lawful men were dratm and sworn as GRAND JURORS for the term, to-wit; John WW, Clark, C.T.McNeely, E.D.Oliphant, T.A.Summers, T,W,Nicholson, D.,H,Perry, Benjamin Stewart, B.M,Stevenson, C.B,Hill, W.C,Austin, A,M,Gabriel, J.B,Freeze, J.H.Bope, W.R.Edwards, R.B.York, J.F.Wiggins, I.N.McLain and A.C, Eidson, John Wi, Clark was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. 0.B, Lazenby was sworn as officer of the Grand Jury. The following good and lawful men were sworn as Pettit jurors: J.D, Patterson, l.G,Sloen, J.P,Frazier, E,J, Troutman, E,J,Stack, C. Fulp, H.O,Steebe, C.L.Mayhew, W.M.Horn and J,W,Mills, The following good and lawful men were sworn as Talis jurors for the week, to-wit: M.H,Sigman, E.L.Goodin, L.K,.Smith, No. 1 State t vs | L. H. Souther HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW Alias Capias. Noe 2 State vé Bill Barnhardt No. 5 state ve Bill Barnhardt NOs 4 State vs Neil Hellard No. 5 State vs John D, Harkey No. 6 State { I 4 vs Rankin Choaninger na, 7 State vs Boise Conner Bo. 8 State vs T,T,Smith No. 9 State vs Tal Sherrill No. 10 State vs N.A.Renegar No. 11 State vs Gaither Foster R,C, Miller No, 12 State vs Floyd Press No, 13 State vs MONDAY, JULY 3lst., 1922. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Alias c.C.W. Ssontinued, TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued under former TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Continued under former TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Continued under former RESISTING AN OFFICER, Alias Capias. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Alias Capias. A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Defendant appeared and showed good behavior and ordered by the Court to be discharged. TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Befts, called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sei fa and Capias, OPERATING AUTO RECKLESSLY, Alias Capias, STORE BREAKING, LARCENY & RECEIVING, Alias Capias. No, 14 State vs J,3, Cagle No. 15 State vs Thomas Owens No. 16 State vs L.H. Hoover No, 17 State vs Leonard enegar No. 18 State vs Grover L,. Smith No. 19 State vs Eli Privette No, 20 State vs J.D,Rogers uO, 21 State vs Henry MecDaniels Fred Shoemaker No. 22 State vs Cal Brom No, 23 State vs Roscoe Holmen No, 24 State vs Will H. Souther No, 25 State vs Ralph Rogers MONDAY, JULY 31st., 1922, RETAILING LIQUOR, Alias TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Deft, called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa Capias,. TO SHOV GOOD BEHAVIOR, Deft, appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, Li, LIQUOR, Alias Captas,. TO SHOE GOOD BEHAVIOR, Alias Capias, LPG, LIQUOR, Continued under former order. TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Continued under former order. ANUP A CTURING LIQUOR, Jefendants come into open’ Court and through their Counsel enters a plea of Liquor, P guilty of Manufacturing HAVING LIQUOR FOR SALE, Alias ‘AVING LIQUOR FOR SALE Alias Capias, : SELLING LIQUOR, Alias Capias, TO SHOW GOOD: BEHAVIOR, Cou sinued undef former order, No, 26 State vs David Honeycutt No. 27 State vs Gaither Hayes No. 28 State vs - Arthur Vaither No, 350 State vs Fale Golden No, 34 State vs Len Houston Thos, Stewart No. 35 State vs J.C, Templeton Levi Earnhardt No. 38, 39, 40, 41 & State vs Raymond Allison No, 435 State vs Van Torrence MONDAY, JULY 3lst., 1922. ne A pe! aE RN ee > pee ec RR ot pe T0 SHOE GOOD BEHAVIOR. Continued under former order, TO SHOE GOOD BEHAVIOR. Continued under former order, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Alias Capias. FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY. Continued under former order under same bond, RESISTING AN OFFICER, Continued as to Houston and Capias as to Stewart, AFFRAY, Each of the defendants comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty of an affray as charged. Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that each of the defendants pay a fine of $10.00 each and each to pay one-half of the cost as taxed by the Clerk, 42 A,W.D.W. with intent to kill; Resisting an officer; teceive, Transport & selling Liquor ; Alias Capias. LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Deft. enter a plea of no$ guilty. The following urors; J.D,Patterson, [i,G,Sloan, 3.P.Frazier, J. Troutman, E,J.Stack, C.Fulp, C.L.Mayhew, WM, Horn, J.W.Mills, M,H,Sigman, E,L.Goodin and L.R. Smith, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of Larceny and Receiving and asks mercy of the Court in sentencing the deft. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common Jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR MONTHS and assigned to work at the County Home for the Aged and Infirm for said county for said period, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday morning, August lst,, 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. nn Pee gia jk ee, Ft TUESDAY, AUGUST 1st., 1922. Tis Honorable Court covened August 1st., 1922, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business, Bo. 45 State vs Clem Gray,Alias Glenn Gray Defendant enters 4 plea,of not guilty. The following jurors: E,J,Stack, J,D, atterson, W.M.,Horn, J.W.Mills, 3.P.Frazier, C.L,Mayhew, E,J,Troutman, M,.G,Sloan, C, Fulp, M.H.Sigman, E,L,Goodin, and L.R.Smith, after being duly sworn &nd enpannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of House breaking, Larceny and receiving in the day time as charged in the bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public’ Roads of said County for said period with felon stripes, a ee No, 36 & 27 State MFG, AND SELLING LIQUOR, vs Continued by consent, Jaspyvr Smith No, 31 State vs A.W. D,. Wi Jol Prosed With Joe Davidson YO. SZ State Ae W . Dd, W e vs Nol Prosed with Leave, Joe Davidson Roy Davidson Nal Roseman Frank Gant No. 335 State RESISTING AN OFFICER, Ree Nol Pros Wi Lee Joe YVavidson oe Roy Davidson Hal Roseman Frank Gant No. 29 State SELLING LIQUOR, vs Nol Prosed With L Sherrill Frazier] oo No, 44 —" ere LARCENY OF AN. AUTOMOBILE S eft. called and failed, J “weed ¢ 4 So . ° udgment Nisi Sci Fa and — cla “apias, Defendant allowed 30 days in which to file bond and if filed within s ‘ striken out, hin said time forfeiture to be No. 15 "ae TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR Fort } ‘ Miles Owens eiture heretofore made is ordered to be striken out. Defendant appeared and’ . nd’ sh and: is orderéd tobactiisuheresd. wir 521 Wo, il State vs Gaither Foster rc. Miller No, 21 State vs Henry McDaniels Fred Shoemaker mo- '7'7 North Carolina, } Iredell County. | TUESDAY, AUGUST 1st., 1922, TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, It is ordered by the Court that the forfeiture heretofore made be striken out, Defendants afppéareddand (showedmgood*behevior and are ordered to be discharged. MANUFACTURING LIQUOR. It appearing to the court that the defendants entered a plea of guilty of Manufacturing Liquor on Monday, July 3lst., 1922 of this Court, there- fore, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendants, Henry McDaniels and Fred Shoemaker, each be confined in the common Jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS each and each be assigned to work on the Public Roads of said’ county for said period without felon stripes, It is further ordered that the execution of this sentence be suspended, if the defendants be oftzZood behavior and refrain from engaging in the liquor trafic in any respect, It is further ordered that if the defendants, lenry McDeniels and Fred Shoemaker, or either of them shall violate this order, then it shall be the duty of the Solicitor, and he shall, and he is so ordered to have Capias issued for the arrest of the said defendants or either of them so violating the liquor Statutes delivered to the jailor of the county and assigned to work on the public Roads of said county for said period,in compliance to the above order. It 1s further ordered by the Court that the defendants Henry McDaniels and Fred Shoemaker each pay a fine of $100.00 and each to pay one- half the cost in this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. ’ I i \ f j { ‘ : } ! ’ { : \ In the Superior Court, August Term, 1922. Eugene Little, by his Next Friend, D,D,Little VS. T.M,Crowell, trading as JUDGMENT. the Statesville Shoe Case Company. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, 1T,B.Finley, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the record, to-wit: lst. Jas the plaintiff injured by the neglect of the defendant as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes, end, What amount is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant ? Answer, $205.00 ord, the plaintiff ? Has the defendant already paid the above amount to Answer. Yes. It is therefore, now considered and adjudged that the Plaintiff recover nothing further of the defendant and that the defendant go hence without day, and that said sum of $205.00 has been paid to the plaintiff by the defendant in full and compleate Satisfaction and discharge of any and all claims and demands arising out of the cause of action set forth in the sompalint. It is ordered that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of Court, Tv. B . Fin ; Judge Pres Tding. TUESDAY, AUGUST 1st., 1922. REPORT OF GRAND JURY. TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY: Hitd;;-Honor, T.B.Finley, Judge Presiding: We the grand Jurors for August Term, 1922, of Iredell Superior Court, beg leave to submit the following report: Wie have passed upon all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made return of the same to the Court. We visited the jail by committee and found one white female and one white male; 3 coloried, one insane colored female and two colored males. We find the jail in rather unsanitary condition. We recommend that slip cases or ticks be provided to use on mattressed so they can be removed and washed, We also recommend that the cells be re-padded and so arranged that they may be properly ventilated and stools installed in cells. We found the Court house and offices in good shape, We visited the Chain Gang and found 27 prosoners; 12 whites; 15 colored, all males, ‘tie found camp well situated and kept in clean sanitary condition, Prisoners on being questioned, stated they were well treated and fed and neighbors state camp is very quiet and orderly at all times, We visited the County Home and found 25 white inmates; 11 males and 14 females; 14 colored inmates; 7 males and 7 females. We inspected all the buildings and found same well kept. We talked with different inmates and all praised the Superintendant, W.C,Perry for his care and kind treatment, There was grow on the farm this year 711 bu. of small grain; 551 bu. wheat, 140 bu. oats and 42 rye. Pleanty of hay to run farm and 200 bu, of old corn still on hand, We especially noted the large amount of canned fruits put up by Mrs, Perry for winter use and understood these and other delicies are very beneficial to the aged and invatids, especially who happen to be there, Respectfully submitted, John W. Clark August 1lst., 1922, Foreman, Th This Honorable Court takes & recess until Wednesday morning, August 2nd,, 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2nd,, 1922, Tis Honorable Court convened Wednesday morning, August 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, No, 18 C.B.Stewart, Adm, Carl Stewart, deceased of Continued, Time allowed to file answer, vs Miller Menufacturing Co. Noe 2 J.L.Sherrill ) VS. B.M,.Wilhelm The following jurors: E,J,Stack, J.D, Patterson, W.M.,Horm, J.P.Frazier, E,J.Troutman, J.W,Mills, M.G.Sloan, M.H.Sigman, E,L.Goodin, L.R.Smith, A.A.Naill and C, Fulp efter bein duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they answer the issues submitted to them as follows: 3I.L.Sherrill } vs i ISSUES B.M.Wilhelm 4} 1st Did the late W,W,Wilhelm agree, at or before taking title to purchase and hold the lands in controversy for the plaintiff until plaintiff should respar him the money advanced and then to convey said lands to plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? ANSVWER, Yes, 2nd,Did plaintiff re-pay said W,W.Wilhelm the money advanced in the purchase of said land as alleged in the complaint ? ANSVER. Yes. ord, Was said land allotted to the defendant as one of the heirs at law of said W,W,Wilhelm in the division of said estate as alleged in the complaint ? ANSWER. Yes. 4th. Is the defendant the omer and entitled to the possession of the lands described in the complaint ? ANSWER. No 5th What is°the value of the rents from said lands per year ? ANSWER. This Honorable Court takes a recess untii Thursday morning, August 3rd,, 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. mdge Presiding loth Judicial Dist. ° Aa elas ay ws eat x North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Tredel1 County. } Before the Clerk, Carolina Motor Co. vs I.R Brewer, J.C,Parker, and JUDGMENT, R,E.King, as Administrator of Ed S, King, deceased, This cause coming on to be heard and, being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on the 7th day of August, 1922, and it appearing to the Court that, the summons in this action was duly issued on the 15th day of June, 1922, ard was duly served on each of the defendants above named, and that the return date as set forth in said summons was on the 26th day of June, 1922, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in said cause on the 22nd day of June, 1922, and that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $370.90 with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 18th day of July, 1921, until paid, and that said amount is due to said plaintiff by the defendant on a note executed by the defendant, J.R.Brewer, to the defendant, J,C.Parker, and endorsed by Ed S,. King, as surety, and that the same was endorsed and transferred to Carolina Motor Co. by J.C.Parker, and that the defendants each of se neglected and failed to file an answer to the complaint filed in this cause: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Gourt that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendants for the sum of $3770.90 and that the defendants pay the costs of this actions It is further ordered and adjudged that the defendants, J.R.Brewer and R,E,King, as Administrator of Ed S, King, deceased, be primarily Jiable on said judgment, and the said J,C,Parker secondarily Liabiey This the 7th day of Augtst, 1922, J.A,Hartness Ulerk of Superior Court, THURSDAY, AUGUST Grd., 1922, This Honorable Court convened Thursday morning, August Srd., 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A,M., for the dispatch of business. Nov 75 North Capolina,| IN the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1922. Statesville Cotton O11 Co. { VSe t sU DEN BN FP, John R. Morrison $ This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, and it appearing that the plaintiff and the defendant have agreed to adjudt all matters of difference between them, and that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the amount agreed upon as a settlement, and the plaintiff having come into Court and asked permission to take non-suit: It is, therefore, now considered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and he is hereby non-suited, It is further adjudged that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, Yea YOY Y-Y- aya: YaYnyvaYoye) QOQODGCOCROGOGLGGGBEE No, 7 Statesville Lumber Co, § The following jurors: M.G.Sloan, W,.M.Horn, ve L.R,Smith, J.W.Mills, C.Fulp, M.H.Sigman, C,H, Knox E.L.Goodman, E,J.Stack, E.J.Troutman, C.L. Mayhew, J.P.Frazier, T,3,Ellis, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they answer the issues submitted as follows; No, 7 North Caroline,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.j August Term, 1922, Statesville Lumber Co.| vs { ISSUES, C,H, Knox { 1st Did the defendant contract and agrer to sell and deliver to the plaintiff a lot of pine lumber, as alleged in the compalint 7? ANSWER: No 2nd Did the defendant fail and refuse to deliver said lumber, as alleged in the complaint 7° ANSWER : Lat ay ; —. What damages, if any, has the plaintiff sustained ? an Answer: In-the Superior Court, Saturday; Aug, 5%h., 1922, Tis Honorable Court convened Saturday, August 5Sth., This Honorable Court convened Friday morning, August 4th,, 1922, 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, AJM, for the dispatch of business, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business, en a | * ad hess: | re No. 9 John H, Thompson After the jury being sworn and empammelled vs and most of the evidence heard, the plaintif H.P.Certer, W.\i,Carter, defendants got together and compromised this and J.H, Johnson case aS will be shown in judgment hereafter recorder in these minutes, No. 80 Versie Miller ve { W,H,Miller 4 (1) Was the plaintiff and vue defendant married as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes (2) Has the plaintiff been a resident and citizen of the State of North Carolina’ for two years preceeding the beginning of this action,.? Answer, Yes, (3) Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes. North Carolina, |} In the Superior Court, Tredell1 County. |] August Term, 1922, John H, Thompson : vs JUDG MEN T. H.P,Carter, J,H. Johnson and V,W,Ccerter, This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, 1.B,Finley, Judge Presiding, and it. appearing to “he Court that after the tri&l was begun, the plaintiff and defendants compromised all matters of difference between them. The defendants agreeing to pay the plaintiff $62.50 and one-half the cost, and the plaintiff agreed to accept the same in full payment and satisfaction of all amounts due hig on the note sued on, and to pay one-half of . aceon 4 oe defendants to recover nothing on their counter-claim or breach of warranty. considered It is fherefore. adjudged th of the defendants the sum of $62.50, judged that the plaintiff recover It is further considered and adjudged that the defendants pay ol of the cost, and take nothing by reason of their counter- It is further considered = ake oF ot: ed and adjudged that plaintiff pay one T,B, Finley Approved: ee Lewis ‘and Lewis Attorneys for aaa CU T.T. Weatherman and Grier’ & Grier orneys erendants, This Honorable Court adjourns until Saturday morning, August Sth., 1922, at 9:30 o'@lock, A.M, Noe 32 J.W. Webb vs Lester Ingram The following jurors; M.G.Sloan, \i,M,Horn, 3I.W.Mills,.A.A.Neill, C. Fulp, M.H.Sigman, E,L.Goodin, E.J.Stack, E.J,Troutman, C.L. Mayhew, J.P.Frazier, and T.J,Ellis, each efter being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they answer the issues submitted as’ follows: No. 32 J.W,.Webb { vs q IssveEFzs Lester Ingram } ist. What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant ? Answer: $100.00 One Hundred Dollars and each man pay his part of the cost, SON RN I EE I AL oe a A EE No, 52 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1922, J.W.Webb { vs § JUDGNENT. Lester Ingram | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County and being heard before, His Honor, T,B,Finley, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues in favor of the plaintiff, as set out in the records It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendent, the sum of One Hundred & no/100 Dollars, and that the defendant pay the cost in this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. T,B. Finley ' uuage Presiding. North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1922. Je W © Webb 4 a Lester Ingram It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that, that pert 38 of the juryacverdict taxing the plaintiff with one-half of the cost, is set aside, Judgment signed as of record. T.B. Finley Jvudge Presiding. This Honorable Court adjourns until Monday morning, Aug. 7th,, 1922, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. MONDAY, AUGUST %th., 1922, Tuesday, August Sth., 1922, Second week, August Term, 1922, This Honorable Court convened Tuesday morning, August North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, 8th., 1922, at 9:50 O'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, August Term, 1922, Iredell County.| Second week for Civil cases.or)”,. A a Seerkee No, 65 j W,C,Prerry This Honorable Court meets according to adjourmment at 10:00 : vs | Gentanaed by consent. | Southern Railway Co. {| ' f, ll st 7th., 1922, when and where His o'clock, A.M. Monday morning, ®néw : : Nos. 36, 28 & 54 consolidated, Honor, 1.B.Finley, Judge Presiding for the 15th Judicial District is No, 56 W,W.Call & Co present and presiding this the second week for Civil cases at August ws J.H.Roberson, et al This case being continued over from Monday, Aug. 7th., 1922, The jury answer the issues submitted to them as follows: North Carolina, jIn the Superior Court, Tredell County. August Term, 1922. Term, 1922. No, 58 irs, Ella B. Higgins, et al vs returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men JcH,Roberson, et al a ll, P., Alexander, the High Shériff of Iredell County, North Carolina, os oaks & Cais end i J.H.Higgins and wife, Ella B, Higgins VS t t ; | ISSUES, 4 to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week for Civil cases, No, 54 John H, Roberson, to-wit: G,.W.Evans, W.M,Long, A.L.Warren, I,D,Harris, J,F,Rimmer, CM. vs W,W,Call & Co.,et al Ist, Was plaintiff, W,W,Call Company's automobile injured and damaged by the negligence of JaH.Roberson and Gilmer Wagner, or either J,H,Roberson and Gilmer Wagner ee LP fae NL PLE ET ENE NC TOT jee I ST Shook, C.B.Troutman, A,J,Deal, J.B.Rhyne, JE, Jurney, J.F,Dobson, F.A. eae cake an ens Cloaninger, J.W.Rinmmer, were returned as could not be found within Iredell County. I.R.“arren, J,L.Harris, J,H.Bryant, c.E.atterson and F.A. Cloaninger were excused for the term, No. 56 WeW.Call & Co. ! vs { Consolidated with Nos, 38 and 54 Je.H.Roberson, et al | No, 358 Mrs, Ella B. Higgins, et al, 7 % Consolidated with N J.H.Roberson, et al, j h Nos, 56 and 54 No, 54 John H, Roberson, et al vs W.W.Call & Co. and J.H? Roberson et al ~~ The following jurors; G.W,Evans, A.L. Warren; I,D,Herris, J,F,Rimmer ; C.M. Shook, C,B. Troutman, A.J,Deal; J.B. Rhyne, J,E,Jurney, J,B.Dobson, WM Long and N.G,Crater were duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict. Part of the evidence being heard, the is continued over to Tuesday morning, Aug. 8th., 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. CL A oe ee J This Honorable Court adjourns until Tuesday morning, Aug. 8th., 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, of them, as alleged in the complaint ? Ans; Yes, both. end, If so, was the injury to Call & Company's automobile caused by the contributory negligence of Call & Compamy ? Ans. No 3rd, What damages, if any, is plaintiff, W.W,Call & Company, entitled to recover ? Ans, 700,00 4th, Was the plaintiff, Mrs. Ella B. Higgins, injured by the negligence of the defendants, I.H.Réberson and Gilmer Wagner, or either of them, as alleged in the complaint 7? Ans, Yes. 5th, Was the injury complained of by lirs. Ella B. Higgins brought about by her own negligence and carelessness, as alleged in the amended answer ? Ang. No 6th, What damage, if any, is Mrs, Ella B. Higgins entitled to recover ? Ans, $125,00 7th, Was J,H.Higgins, at the time of the injury, acting as the agent of W.W,Call & Company ? Ans, No 8th, Was J,H.Roberson injured and damaged by the negligence of J,H.Higgins, as alleged by him ? And, No 9th, Was J,H.Roberson injured and damaged by the negligence of W,W,Call & Company's agent, as alleged in his complaint ? Ans, No 10th, Did J,H,Roberson by his own negligence contribute to his injury, as alleged in the answer ? Ans, Yes, llth, What damage, if any, is J.H.Roberson entitled to recover of J,H.Higgins ? Ans, None 12th, What damage, if any, is J,H,Roberson entitled to recover of W.W,Call & Company ? Answer, Nothing. This Honorable Court adjourns until Wednesday morning, August 9th,, 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M, Wednesday, August 9th., 1922, This Honorable Court convened Wednesday morning, August 9th., 1922 at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business, Statesville Lumber Co. vs C.H. Knox The following jurors: M,G,Sloan, WeM.Horn, L.R, Smith, IJ.W Milis, C.Fulp, M.H.Sigman, E.L.Goodin, E.J.$tack, E,J, Troutman, C,L.Mayhew, J.P,Frazier, J.D, atterson, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdick answer the issues submitted as follows: No, 7 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } August Term, 1922, Statesville Lumber Co. } vs 4 ITS 8 Uf 8, C,H, Knox J 1st, Did the defendant contract and agree to sell and deliver to the plaintiff a lot of pie lumber, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer; No nd: Did the defendant fail and refuse to deliver said lumber, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer : 3rd: What damage, if any, has the plaintiff sustained ? Answer: ee EE pe I EE oS — No, 7 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} August Term, 1922. Statesville Lumber Co, VS Q C.H. Knox This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard beofre His Honor, ?,B.Finley, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the record in favor of the defendant: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover noyfing from the defendant in this action, and it is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, T.B, Finley Judge Presiding. Wednesday, August 9th., 1922. No. 64 North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | August Term, 1922. John B. Wilson vs { JUDGUENT, } { 4 ¢.V.Voils, and J. A, Wagstaff This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T,.B.Finley, Judge Presiding and being heard and it appearing that the summons in this cause was issued from the Forsyth County Court on Nov. 29, 1921, and served @n the defendants on Dec. 9, 1921, and it further appearing that the cause was moved from the Forsyth County Court to the Superior Cpurt of Iredell County for trial, and it further appearing that no complaint has been filed in this action, and Z.V.Turlington, Attorney for the defendants heaving moved that this action be non-suited for failure to file compalint. It is therefofe ordered and adjudged that the motion for non-suit be and the same is hereby granted and it is further ordered and adjudged that the said action be and the same is hereby non-suited, that the costs be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of this Court. T,.B, Finley suage tresiding. No, 49 u,F,Snow’ and Fox-Millsapps The following jurors; C.B.Troutman, Motor Co, J.F,.Dobson, ‘.M,Long, J.E.Jurney, vs A.L, Warren, G.,Evans, I.D,.“arris, Southern Railway Co. I,L,Harris, C.M,Shook, 4.J.Deal, N.G.Crater, and F,A,.Cloaninger, efter being duly sworn and empannelled for verdict, Case continued over to Thursday Aug. 10th., 1922. No. 8 T.L. Tomlin Continued on the account of Paul _ Livengood,-plff. witness being in Merchants Bank & Trust Hostipal sick. Cé., Executor of the estate of W.Frahk Snipes, This Honorable Court adjourns until Thursday morning, August 10th,, 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. Le North Caroline, | In the Superior Court, Tredell County. } Before the Clerk. WeF.Sparpe | \ JUDGHNENT. vs H.R.Cowles 4 Tis cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on the 7th day of August, 1922, same being the first Monday of August, 1922, and 4t appearing to the Court that the summons was issued in this action on the 28th day of June, 1922, and that the defendant was duly served with said summons, and thet the return day set forth in said summons was on the 12th day of July, 1922, and that the complaint was duly filed and verified on the 10th. day of July, 1922, the same being a verified complaint, and that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff on a note in the sum of One Thousand Three Hundred Sixty-four and 38/100 ($1564.38) Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 10th day of July, 1922, until paid, and the defendant has failed ond neglected to file an answer or demur to said complaint: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, W.F.Sharpe, recover judgment against the defendant, H.R. Cowles, for the sum of One Thousand Three Hundred and Sixty-four and 38/100 (1364.38) Dollars and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 10th day of July, 1922, until paid, and that the defendant pay the’ costs of this action. This the 7th day of August, 1922, J.A,Hartness Clerk of the Superior court of iredell County. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk. Carolina Motor Company 4 vs { JUDGMENT, W.L.Gilbert | This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, and being heard on the 7th, day of August, 1922, the same being the first Monday of August, 1922, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was issued on the 22nd, day of June, 1922, and duly gerved on the defendant on the 23rd day of June, 1922, and that the return day set forth in said summons was on the 3rd day of July, 1922, and the plaintiff filed a verified complaint in this action on the e3srd day of June, 1922, and that this action is an action on a note, end to secure said note the defendant trans- ferred and assigned to the plaintiff as surety for said note five shares of the common stock of the Queen Knitting Mills, Inc., being represented by stock certificate No. 9, and that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $206.12 and interest thereon from the 5th day of December, 1921, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file an answer to the plaintiff's complaint: It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover from the defendant the sum of $206.12 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 5th day of December, 1921, until paid, and that the saic defendant pay the costs of this action, It is further ordered and adjudgea by the Court that this judgment be and the same is hereby declared and made a specific lien on the five shares of stock of the Queen Knitting Mills, Inc., es decribed and set forth in the complaint, and that H.E.Lewis, is hereby appointed a Commissioner of this Court and authorized and directed to sell said stock at public auction at the Court House door of Ifedell County to the highest bidder for cash on the 4th day of September, 1922, at 12 o'clock, i, after advertising same for twenty days at the Court House door of Iredell County and three other public places in Iredell County. It’ is further ordered and adyudged by the Court that said Commissioner shall first pay the costs of this action out of the money received for said stock, and apply the surplus to the payment of the judgment of the plaintiff against the defendant, and pay the ballence, if any, to the plaintiff, W.L.Gilbert, This cause is retained for further orders, This the 7th day of August, 1922. J.A,Hartness Clerk Superior Court of iredell County. Thursday, August 10th., 1922 ceiond week, August Term, 1922. This Honorable Court convened Thurs day morning, August 10th., 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business. No, 49 W,F,Snow and Fox-Millsaps Motor CO. ’ This case being continued over fron Wednesday, Aug. 9th., 1922, was again taken up and the jury answer the issues VS submitted as follows: S s Railway Co. North Carolina,{ In the Superior Court, ial . Tredell County.§ August Term, 1922, W.F.Snow and Fox-Millsaps} Motor Co. vs {| ISSUES. Southern Railway Company 4 ist. Was the truck of plaintiff, WF, Snow, injured by the negligence, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes. ond: Was the plaintiff's injury caused by the contributory negligence of plaintiff's driver, as alleged in the answer ? Answer: No 3rd; What demage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover ? Answer: $2750,00 and interest fron June 4th., 1921, to date. { } : 4 { ) 4 { f t j \ t { i { { ‘ j } ‘ j No. 49 North: Cerolina,t- In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } August Term, 1922. W.F.Snow ond Fex-liillsaps Motor Company, { ' ’ vs JUDGHUENT Southern Railway Company. | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, T,.B.Finley, Judge Presiding and a jury, and His Honor having submitted to the jury and the jury having answered the following issues as follows, to-wit: lst. Was the truck of the plaintiff, W.F,Snow, injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer. Yes. 2nd, Was the plaintiff's injury caused by the contributory negligence of the plaintiff s driver, as alleged in the answer? AnSWeTr. No i 3rd. What damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer. -e oe reaps interest from June 4th,, 1921, to date. s therefore considered, ad ; Court that plaintiff recover from the d, adiudced sae ie aan eet octane and Fifty Dollars, with interest from June 4th,, 1921, until rte — with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of T.B. Finley Judge Presiding and holding the Superior Noi ¢9 Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District. W.F,Snow and Fox-Millsaps Motor Co. | vs A, Southern Railway Company NOPECE\OFTAPPEAL TO SUPREME COURT. At the close of all of as of non-suif. Phainti¢fcexcepta, “sone tlie te me Oe . appeal and 50 day thereafter allowed Po tiie oleae C0 we Saee i or exceptions. Bond of $50.00 adjudged seerisieacy ones ee This Honorable Co Lith., 1922, ‘at 9:30 ek ka until Fridey morning August Friday, August llth., 1922, {This Honorable Court convened Saturday morning, August llth., 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, No, 59 N.A. (Tom) Eidson 4 vs } Issues, Maggie Eidson j Ist: Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, ond; Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart from each other for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action ? Answer: Yes. 3rd: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action ? Answer: Yes. No, 59 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Tredell County. } August Term, 1922, N,A. (Tom) Eidson } : vs JUDGMENT. Maggie Eidson j This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court See Leura wet ha ee Judge Presiding, and a jury, and an s Honor havi subr Belicwing rhea. ng submitted to the jury the lst: Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes. . 2nd: Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate a apart fron each other more than five years prior to the eginning of this action ? Anaswer: Yes. ie ker tr and mg the Srey sig been a resident of the State na for more an’ five years prior to t b of this action ? Answer: es, : . a And all of the s tyes" by the jury: e said issues having been answered, “Yes It is therefore considered, adjudged and decreed that 9 oe of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff efendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, T.B. Finley vudge presiding loth Judicial District. sie a eR oe ae Ca ee Se Bridey, August lith., 1922, No. 66 3.C,Steele & Sons vs i J.B,Owens, trading and doing business as tmpire Floor and Wall Tile Co., and as I.B.Owens Continuous Tunnel Kiln Co. In what amount, if any, is the defendants 4ndebted to . $ ? _— ae $1688.30, with interest from May 27th,, 1920. No. 66 - North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. } July:% Term, 1922, C.M,Steele, H.O.Steele, A,P,Steele, and F.F,Steele, Partners trading and JUDGMENT. we V2 ) i doing business as J,C,Steele & Sons, 6 | B,Owens, trading and doing business ( Floor and Wall Tile Co. and q B,Owens Continuous Tunnel Kiln Co. ™ This Cause coming on to be heard at the July Tern, 1922, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, T.B.Finley, Judge Presiding, and a jury and it appearing to the Court that judgment by default and inquiry was rendered by J,A,Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 19th day of June, 1922, and that this cause was transferred to the Civil Issue docket of the Superior Court of Ifedell County so that the amount due the plaintiff by the defendant might be determined by the jury upon the issue submitted to them; and it appesring further to the court that the jury has answered tht the issue submitted to them as follows: "In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiffs ? Answer, ‘)1688,30, and interest from May 27, 1920, until paid." It is therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum of $1688.50, and interest on said sum at six per cent from May 27, 1920, until paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, It appearing further from the judgment rendered by the Clerk of Court in this action that the property of the defendant in the hands of the Atlantic Marble and Tile Company was attached on the 30th day of March, 1922, by a werrant of attachment issued in this action and that Friday, August llth., 1922, the said Atlantic Marble & Tile Compamy answered the notice of garnishment served upon it on the 17th day of April, 1922, that it owed the defendant at the time of said attachment the sum of $1775.80. It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment obtained in this action is a lien on the amount in the hends of the Atlantic Marble & Tthe'Company, and judgment is hereby rendered against the said Atlantic Marble & Tile Company for the amount determined by the jury to be due the plaintiffs, to be charged upon the payment into this Court of ghe sun of °1775,80, and interest on said amount from the 17th day of April, 1922. T.B, Finley Judge Presiding. DDO OOOOOBAODN DOD APBDOMADRAA Sa XIVGQ@E KIGORKK PARAAAPIDIAAN QIGAIOABBSAGIWIIVIGOISSATIGIBS No, 41. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | July Term, 1922, J.T, Chappell 4 vs } FTUDGMERNT Hutton % Bourbonnais Co, | This cause coming on to be heard at the July Term, 1922, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, 1.B. Finley, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties to this action have settled and compromised the matters in controversy between them, and it appearing further that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the amount agreed upon: It is therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover nothing further by this action and that the defendant pay the costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. T.B.Finle Judge Presiding. By consent: Dorman Thompson Mtorney for platneiee R.T,Weatherman and Grier & Grier rneys for defendant. QQOBGG@AEB@Q@WBGSQOGIBIOOB QIQ@QQQWIGBWIEGGGAGEQWESIO = as a parser —, ee eal ® August 11th. > 1922. No. 36 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, ae * > Iredell County. | July Term, 1922, W,W,Call & CO. vs { JUDGMENT. J.H.Roberson and Gilmer Wagner } ere This cause coming on to be neard at this term of Court before His Honor, 1.B.Finley, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the parties having agreed to consolidate and try in one action the abaéve entitled case, and the cases of lirs. Ella B. Higgins and husband against J.H.Roberson and Gilmer Wagner, and John H. Roberson vs. J.H.Higgins and WeW,Call & Co., at one time, and it appearing to the Court that this is an action for the recovery of damages to plaintiff's property by reason of the unlawful and negligent operation by the defendants of an Automobile on the highways of the State, the allegations of said unlawful conduct and negligence being as follows, to-wit: "chat on or about the 3rd day of June, 1921, as plaintiff is informed and believes, the defendant, J.H.Roberson, as omer, and Gilmer Wagner, as chaffeur, were unlawfully operating an automobile on the public highways of this State, leading from Salisbury through Statesville to Newton, not having procured said automobile to be registered, and not having attached to and displayed thereon, the registered display number as required by 1aW; thet at said time plaintiff's automobile was being driven along said highway from Newton, N.C., to Statesville, N.C., and on reaching a point about three miles West of Statesville, the defendants while driving safd automobile an am opposite direction, and fn approaching and traversing a sharpe curve and decent | on said highway, and in approaching and meeting plaintiff's automobile carelessly) negligently, recklessly and unlawfully, and at a high excessive, end unlawful rate of speed, and on the wrong side of the highway and not having their automobile under control, ran into and against plaintiff's automobile , oreakansy twisting, injuring and damaging plaintiff's said automobile to such an extent that plaintiff was forced to expend in its reasonable repair, the sum of $837.52, and was without the use of said automobile, in its business, for the space of three weeks, all to the plaintiff's great damage, in the sum of Nine Hundred Twelve and 52/100 Dollars," And the Court having submitted the following issues to the jury and the jury having answered, as follows, to-wit: Friday, August llth., 1922, ist: Was the plaintiff, W.W,Call & Co's, automobile injured and damaged hy the negligence of J,H,Roberson and Gilmer Wagner, or either of them, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, both, nd: If so, was the injury to Call Co.'s automobile caused by the contributory negligence of Call & Co. ? Answer: Ne. Srd: What damage, if any, is plaintiff, W.W.Call & Co., entitled to recover ? Answer: $700.00. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of “700,00 with interest thereon from the Slst day of July, 1922, until paid, together with the costs of this action, It is further considered and adjudged that if execution issued against the property of the defendants be returned unsatisfied, in whole or in part, that execution may then be issued against the person of the defendants, T.B.Finley_ Judge Presiding and holding the Superior Courts of the 15th Judicial District. No, 2. J.L.Sherril1 § vs 4 Notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. B.M,Wilhelm f ay Defendant moves to set aside verdict and for a new trial. For errors committed by the Court in the trial of this case end his charge to the jury. Motion denied, Exceptions. Judgment, Exesptis Exceptions, Defendant appeals to the Supreme Court, Notice of appeal waived in open Court. Defendant allowed 60 days by consent in which to make up case, and plaintiff allowed 30 days thereafter ti file counter case or exceptions, Appeal bond of $50.00 adjudged sufficient, No, 38 North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredel1 County. | July Térm, 1922. Mrs, Ella B. Higgins yS ' JUDGMENT, J.H.Roberson and Gilmer Wagner | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor, 1.B.Finley, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the parties having agreed to consolidate and try in one action, the above entitled case and the casex of WI, W,Call & Company VS. J.H.Roberson and Gilmer Wagner, and the case of John H, Roberson vVS-. J.H.Higgins and W,.W. Call & Co., at one time, and it appearing that this is an action for the recovering of damages for injuries caused by reason of the unlawful and negligent operation by the defendants of an automobile on the highways of the State, the allegation of said unlawful condtict and negligence being as follows, to-wit: "mat on or about the 3rd day of June, 1921, as plaintiff 4s informed ond believes, the defendant, J,H.Robertson, as owner, and Gilmer Wagmer, as Chaffeur, were unlawfully operating an automobile on the public highway of this State leading from Salisbury through Statesville to Newton, not having procured said automobile to be registered and not having attached to and displayed thereon, the registered display number as required by law; that at said time plaintiff's automobile was being driven along said highway from Newton, N.C, to Statesville, N.C., and on reaching a point about three miles West of Statesville, the defendant while driving said automobile in an opposite direction and in appreaching and traversing a sharpe curve and decent on said highway, and in approaching and meeting plaintiff's automobile, carelessly, negligently, recklessly and unlawfully, and at a high, excessive, and an unlawful rate of speed, and on the wrong side of the highway, and not having having their automobile under control, ran into and against plaintiff's automobile, breaking, twisting, injuring and demahing plaintiff's said automobile to such an extent that phaintiff was forced to expend in its reasonable dy repair the sum of °)857,52, and was without the use of said automobile, for the space of three weeks, all to plaintiff's great damage, in the sum of $912.52," Friday, August llth., 1922, And the Court having submitted the following issues to the jury, and the jury having answered satd issues as follows, to-wit: 4th: Was the plaintiff, Mrs. Ella B, Higgins injured by the negligence of the defendants, J.H,Hobertson and Gilmer Wagner, or either of them, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes. 5th: Was the injury complained of by Mrs. Ella B. Higgins brought about by her own negligence and carelessness, as alleged in the amended answer ? Answer: No. 6th: What damages, if any, is lirs. Ella B. Higgins, entitled to recover ? Answer: $125.00, It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $125.00 with interest thereon from the 3lst day of July, 1922, until paid, together with the costs of this action. It is further considered and adjudged that if execution issued against the property of the defendants be returned unsatisfied, in whole or in part, that execution may then be issued against the person of the defendants, T.B.Finley Judge Presiding I5th Judicial District. CQIDAIBOIDGGOIBGOSSISIAAWIGLO QBASABAQAGVAGBIIGIGBIBIIIIIBIRE Friday, August llth., 1922. No. 54 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | July Term, 1922. H, Robertson 4 +e + ve | JUDGMENT. vs This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor, T,B,Finley, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the parties having agreed to consolidate and try in one action, the above entitled case, and the case of W.W,Call & Co. vs J,H.Robertson and Gilmer Jiagner, and the case of rs, Ella B. Higgins vs. J.H. Robertson and Gilmer Wagner, and His Honor having submitted to the jury the following issues, and the jury having answered said issues as follows, to-wit: 8th: Was J.H,Robertson injured and damaged by the negligence of J.H.Higgins, as alleged by him ? Answer: Wo. 9th: Was J,H.Robertson injured and damaged by the negligence of W,W,Call & Co.'s agent, as alleged in his compalint ? Answer: no, loth: Dis J,R,Robertson by his own neglégence contribute to his injury, as alleged in the answer ? Answer: Yes, llth: ‘What amount, is any, is J,H.Robertson entitled to recover of J.H.Higgins ? Answer: None, 12th: What amount, if any, is J.H.Robertson entitled to recover of VW.W.,Call & Co, ? Answer; Nothing, It is therefore considered and adjudged that plaintiff take nothing and the defendants recover costs of action in this behalf expended, T,B,Finl ge OTIICIIGIABOIVE WQOOWBAQDADOAHAAE GBBSOQTBIOBIIGBOAIBIOSIVABSADUAIBQ® Priday, August llth., 1922. No. 2 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, tredell County. | July Term, 1922, Jonn L. Sherrill 4 vs { JUDGMENT. B, M, Wilhelm _ Tis cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, T.B,Finley, and a jury, and His Honor having submitted to the jury the issues hereinafter set out, said issyes ahdvthe answeretheréto being as follows, to-wit: lst. Did the late W.W.Wilhelm agree, at or before taking title to purchase and hold the lands in controversy, for the plaintiff until plaintiff should repay him the money advanced, and then to convey said lands to plaintiff as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes. 2nd, Did plaintiff repay said W,W,Wilhnelm the money advanced for the purchase of said lands, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, Srd, Was said lands alloted to the defendant as one of the heirs at law of said W.W,Wilhelm in the division of said estate as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes. 4th, Is the defendant the owner and entitled to the possession of the lands described in the complaint ? Answer: 5th, What is the value of the rents from said lands year ? Answer: = It is therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff is the ower and entitled to the possession of said lands, and that the defendant holds the legal titled thereto as trustee for plaintiff, and that plaintiff 4s entitled to have said lands conveyed to him in fee simple, It is further considered and adjudged that the defendant, B.M. Wilhelm, be, and he is hereby required and directed to execute and deliver to the plaintiff a deed conveying to the said plaintiff, John L, Sherrill, and nis heirs and assigns, the lands mentioned and described in the complaint in this action free and discharged from @11 claims, encumberances, liens, demands, or title of the said W.W, Wilhelm end of all persons claiming thro him, th It is further considered and adjudged that the defendant pay © cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. T,B. Finley er e es ° Friday, August llth., 1922. No. 42 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} August Term, 1922. R,.H, Branch JUDGMENT. vs J.F.Moore, et al This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, 1T.B. Finley, Judge ‘residing, end being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff failed to appear and prosecute his appeal in this action and by order of the Court the said plaintiff was called by the Sheriff to come in and prosecute his appeal and the said plaintiff failed to appear, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said appeal be dismissed and the costs be texed against the plaintiff by the Clerk. T,B. Finley oudge Presiding. Syn y IV AYE TYTN — es AGI QOOCOQOICLOSIGE ADI ROCCOCE y Yaya oy eaave a d Roh QOIVVIE PADS No. 75 North Carolina, ( In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1922, L.0.White and wife, Effie A, White 4 vs ) JUDGMENT. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co, | It appearing to the Court that the parties to this action have adjusted their differences and the same abates, It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover nothing and that the cost be taxed against the defendant to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, T.B. Finley Judge fresiding, BY CONSENT: W.D, Turner Rttorney for plaintitrs — Grier & Grier ; Rttorneys for defendant, Friday, August 17th., 1922, North Carolina, Tm the Superior Court, Tredell County. | Before the Clerk, Uiversal Auto Co, 6 vs t JUDGEMENT OF NON-SUIT. J, L, Chamberlain This cause coming on before the undersigned Clerk and it appearing that the parties have settled their differences, Therefore it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited and that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. J.A,Hartness Clerk Superior Court, No. 80 North Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court, August Term, 1922, vs eu DG EER Ty 0 ' Versie Miller ; W.eH, Miller This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor, T.B,Finley, Judge Presiding and a jury and the following issues having been submitted to the jury and answer in the affirmative, as ony” to-wit: 1 Was the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes, (2) Has the plaintiff been a resident and a citizen of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceeding the beginning of this action ? Answer, Yes, (3) Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes, Wherefore i& is ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff Versie Miller and the defendant, W.H.Miller be, and they ere hereby dissolved and the said Veraie Miller is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the said W,H, Miller. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff be taxed with the, cost of this action by the Clerk of this Court, T.B. Finley vudge Presiding. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredel1 County. } Before the Clerk. Universal Auto Company 4 vs } JUDGMENT. Hardin (PsHe}yLazenby 4 This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, end being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 12th day of July, 1922, plaintiff procured a summons to be issued against the defendant returnable on the 24th day of July, 1922, and that said summons was duly served on the defendant on the 14th day of July, 19223; and it further appearing that this is an action on a note to recover the amount due thereon, and which the defendant has failed to pay, to-wit; *225,00, with interest from July, 27th, 1921; and it further appearing that on the 20th day of July, 1922 plaintiff filed a verified complaint in said action, and that more then twenty days have elapsed since the return date of said summons, and that the defendant has failed to appear and answer or demir to said verified complaint of the plaintiff; ond it further appearing that in order to secure the payment of the note aforesaid the defendant executed under and delivered to the Universal Auto Company an instrument in writing under seal lmown as a chattel mortgage, wherein he conveyed to said Universal Auto Company one pair of black horse mules nine years old and two 2-1/2 ton Indiana trucks , which chattel mortgage provided in case the defendant failed to pay said debt and interest on or before the 27th day of September, 19213 that the mortgagee could advertise and sell said property after due advertisement as therein provided, and supply the proceeds of said sale to the discharge of the indebtedness evidenced by said note; and it further appearing that the plaintiff is now the owner of said note and the chattel mortgage securing the same, and that no part of said indebtedness has been paid, end that the defendant is now due the plaintiff the sum of $225.00, with interest thereon from July 27th., 1921, It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $225.00, with interest thereon from July 27th, 1921, until paid, together with the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Court, It is further considered and adjudged that this judgment for eh ~e25,00 and interest and cost as aforesaid be, and the same is, hereby declared to be and constitute a specific lien upon said pair of black horse mules, about nine years old, ahd upon two 21/2 ton Indiana Trucks, peing the identical mules and trucks conveyed by defendant in the chattel mortgage aforesaid, and executed to secure the note afore- said, and to this end it is considered, adjudged and decreed that execution issue, directing the sheriff to levy upon and take into his possession the said mules and trucks, and advertise and sell the same free and discharge from any and all claims of the defendant, said levy, advertisement and sale to be made as required for other sales of personal property under execution. This 2lst day of August, 1922, J.A,Hartness Clerk of Superior Court, COYON YOY ONO CMON OM NON Yee ) QOOOOO OCCU COCCCECOOCEOLEOO GQIGLARIGABGABIIBUAWTIVAIBO North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredel1 County, Before the Clerk, Universal Auto Co. $ vs I H, C. Hunter his cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned lerk of the Superior Court of Iredel, County, end being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 5th day of July, 1922, plaintiff procured a summons to be issued against the defendant returnable on the 16th day of July, 1922; and it further appearing that on the 7th day of July, 1922, said summons was duly served on thé defendant; and it further appearing that this is an action on a note for the recovery of $239,70, with interest thereon from May 10th, 1922; and it further appearing that on the 16th day of July, 1922, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in this. action, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date of said summons and the filing by Plaintiff of the verified complaint as aforesaid, and that defendant has failed to appear and answer or demur; and it further appearing that the indebtedness due the plaintiff is secured by a conditional s . ele agreement, wheredn title to one S.H.Ford toyring car, model No. 5 544743 is reserved until said indebtedness aforesaid is fully peid; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is now due and xz owing the pleintiff the sum of $239.70, with interest thereon from May 10, 1922, It is, therefore, considered, adjudged arid decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $239.70, with interest thereon from May 10, 1922, until paid, together with the cost of this action, to be taxed by the Court. It is further considered and adjudged that this judgment be, he same is hereby declared to be and constitute a specific lien upon S.H,Ford touring car, model No, 3544743, being the identical car described in the conditional sale agreement aforesaid, and to this end it is considered, adjudged and deereced that execution issue, directing sheriff to levy upon, to take into his possession and to advertise and sell said Ford touring car, free and discharge from any and all claims of the defendant, and that said levy, advertisement and sale ; be made as required for other sale of personal property under execution. This 2lst day of August, 1922, J,A,Hartness Clerk of Superior Court. North Carolina, } Tredell County.) Before the Clerk. R.T, Lowery and wife, Bessie Lowery { \ vs { JUDGEMENT Lum MeLelland This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appear ing to the Court that the plaintiffs and defendant have settled their aifferences: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed, and it is further ordered that the defendant pay the costs of this action. This the 2lst day of August, 1922, J,A,Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredelj County, North Carolina, t In the Superior Court, Trede1l County. | Before the Clerk, Hassell Johnson Company, Inc. § vs 4 JUDGMENT, Roy C, Tatum i This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iréd@1l1, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 28th day of July, 1922, plaintiff procured a summons to be issued against the defendant, returnable on the 7th day of August, 1922; and it further appearing that on the 2nd day of August, 1922, said summons was duly served on the defendant; and it further appearing that this is an action for breach of an express contract to pay absolutely a sun of money fixed by said contract, to-wit; for the recovery of $268.71, and interest thereon from the 10th dag of lIlay, 1922, due by note; and it further appeafing that on the 2nd day of August, 1922, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in this action, and thet more than twenty days have elapsed since the return of said summons and the filing’ by plaintiff of the verified complaint as aforesaid, and that defendant has failed to appear and answer or demurr; and it further appearing to the Court that defendant is now due and owing the plaintiff the sum of °268,.71, with interest thereon from the 10th day of May, 1922. It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of ()268.71, with interest thereon from the 10th day of May, 1922, until paid, together with the cost of this action, to be taxed by the Court. This the 4th day of September, 1922. J.A,Haertness Clerk o: ouperior Court. ON ONONNONONOENOIPEE: MOND YOY oY COREY EAEKAS COUR OLAS NNO A AOOOOOOOOOHOGOOOEOOOSOHOEOOSE woTuwedns YsteTo ssouzaey Vv °C *sa6T Saoquoydes jo fep UST STUL *q.mog ou, fq poxey oq OF UOTZOS SFU FO 4800 UjTA z9yzOI0q fpted Tzu ‘oost Sugg ATur Worry UCSteUy 4S50104UT watn fOS*Lye: JO ums oy FUBpUETOp ey FO IOAOOOL JITPUFSTA 9} 4cUy poeqoep pus pespnfpe Spodueptsuoo fortosedeuy ‘st 41 ‘eset Surg ATNE Wory UooesSyy qsouequtT uyTM fOS°LPS, JO UMS OU} JITIUTeTd ou, BuyMo pus Senp MoU ST quepuejop oy 48Uuy 4FaNoD ey OF Suz weodde uwseyzINy YF pus £ LIMuwSp IO Jousue puc Teodde 0f POETTeF sey quepuejep 7eU4 pus ‘pyesedose se qupTeTduos potjtTuea euy Jo JitquTetd fq SUTTTI 94} pue suocUMMS PTS go UIM{OTI 94 9OUTS posdeTo ovAcy sfep Og SAOW yey pPUe fuotTyzoe STU UT QUTeTAUOD POT JTAOA @ POTTS FJITIWTetd *szet *ysnBnp go sep UIFS 944 uo 4eU4 Butaeodde azouyamy YF pus feqou fq onp *gzZ6T ‘ua9g AtTue wods uosdteyy ysouoquT pus fOG*LPA; FO Adtoaooed OUR AOF *4TM-0F ‘1. 908a4yU00 pies fq poxty Aouow fo ums v AToyntosqe Led 04 70e1}UOD ssoudx us ST STU} 181 Bupaeodde useyymy it pue fyuepusrTep eyy UO pPoAES ftp sen suoumms ptes ‘eget *asnB8np yo Hep WAST ou. UO yey BUT -reodde soyzuny yt pue feget ‘ysnSny jo Lep uiPS 94R UO STQeUINzZON ‘quepuojep ou ysUTeSe penssT oq 07 suocWMMS & pomooud JzTIUTETA ‘sz6elt *ysnSny jo Lup YIFT O44 UO 4B. YaMOD OY 04 BuTaeedde YT pus ‘pazeoy Suteq pue *fyun09 Tlepear yo yanop asotuedngs euyy so W4eTO poustTsiepiM uy SuoOjoq pueey oq 04 UO BuypUOO esned STULL { aedoop ‘i ‘LNGNOadAL sé ) eurpquetted’v ‘Ll *3A0TO 04 etozeg {°£4un0p Trepedt ‘4.mog aofuedng eyy ur jfeuTToreg UPTON In Superior Court, Aug. Term, 1922. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. } July Term, 1922, J.M,Rimmer, et al | vs { ou OGRE XN Tt J.M. Joyner, et al This cause coming on to be heard at the July Term, 1922, of the Superior Court of Iredel1 County before His Honor, 7,.B.Finley, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that rties to this action have settled and adjusted all matters and things in controversy between them; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court hat this action be dismissed end that the costs of the action be paid by the plaintiffs. T,.B, Finley sudge Presiding. BY CONSENT: L.C,Caldrell Fttorney for plaintiiis Dorman Thonpson Attorney Tor Velendants, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6th., 1922, North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredell County. 4 November Term, 1922, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolina, on the 9th Monday after the 1st Monday in September, 1922, the same being the 6th day of November, A.D. 1922, said Court being adjourned from day to day to Thursday morning, November 9th., 1922, when and where His Honor, T.B.Finley, Judge Presiding, is present and presiding, and the Hon, Hayden Clement, Solicitor is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, M.P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the First week of this term, to-wit: The following were drawn as Grand jurors for the term: J.E.Sloop, J.T.Morrison, S,A.Padgett, A.E,Howard, J.R. Abernathy, J.C.McNeely, A.B.Young, Geo, R. Anderson, J.S.Wood, T,1,Nixon, J.G.Preeze, E.D,Brady, J.F.Gouger, J.S.Morrison, T.L. Barnard, R.B.Fleming, W.M.Boggs, and A,J.Cain. S.A. Padgett was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. 0.B,Lazenby was sworn as officer of the Grand Jury. The following were returned"nof$ to be found": C.E,Loftin, John %!, Sherrill, J,O.Gaither and W.H.Smith, G.M,Galliner. The following were excused by the Court on account of business relations: C.M.Steele and B.A,Padgett, W.R.Rose, WeA. Winecoff, The following were returned and sworn as Petit jurors: DL.Webb, J,L.Lunday, W.M.Lentz, J.E.Mcexey, E,C,Absher, C,Chas, Clim, J,.M,Ostwalt, M,.D.Goodmen, J.B.Lippard. The following men were picked up and sworn as Talis Jurors: J,W,Moore, D,L,Stevenson, Vance McDaniels, No. 1 State | HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, 7S { Nol Prosed ith Leave. L,H.Souther } Yo, 2 State vs HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW. Bill Bernhardt Nol Prosed With Leave. a Thursday, Novenber 9th., 1922. No. 3 State vs Bill Barnhardt (W.H.) No. 4 State vs Neil Hellard No. 5 State vs John D, Harkey Noe 6 State vs Rankin Cloaninger No. 7 State vs Boise Conner No. 8 State vs T,T, Smith lo. 9 State vs Tal Sherrill No, 10 State vs : Floyd Press No, ll State vs : Block Valton No, 12 State vs J,J.Cagle No, 13 State vs L.H.Hoover No, 14 State ° ™ ueonard Nenegar No. 15 State vs Grover L. Smith CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON. Nol Prosed With Leave. TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued under former order. TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Defendant appeared and showed good behavior and discharged from further appearing. HAVINH LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW. Continued under former order. RESISTING AN OFFICER, Nol Prosed With Leave. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW. Nol Prosed With Leave. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Nol Prosed ith Leave, OPERATING AUTO RECKLESSLY. Nol Prosed With Leave. STORE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Alias Capias, RETAILING LIQUOR, Nol Prosed With Leave, BOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Defendant appeared and showed good behavior and was discharged, MFG, LIQUOR. Alias Capias,. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Alias Capias. Thursday, November 9th., 1922, Noe 16 State vs Eli Privett No. 17 State vs I,D.Rogers No e 18 State vs Cal Brown No. 19 State vs Roscoe Holmen No. 20 State vs Will H. Souther To, 21 State vs Ralph Rogers No, 22 State vs David Honeycutt No. 23 State vs Gaither Hayes No. 24 State vs Arthur Gaither No, 25 State vs Fale Golden No, 27 State vs Jasper Smith No. 28 State Vs Jasper Smith Nos, 29 vs Raymond Allison RETAILING LIQUOR, Alias Capias, TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Defendant appeared and showed good behavior, and was discharged, HAVING LIQOR OF SALE. @lias Capias,. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY Alias Capias, SELLING LIQUOR. Alias Capias, TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendant appeared and showed good behavior. Continued under former order. TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendant appeared and showed good behavior. Continued under former order. UNLAWFUL AMOUNT OF LIQUOR. Continued under former order. APPLYING TO HIS OWN USE MONEY Nol Prosed With Leave. FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY. Appearing to the Court that the defendant has paid the cost in full and it is ordered that she is discharged. SELLING LIQUOR. Nol Prosed With Leave. MANUFACTURING LIQUOR. Nol Prosed With Leave. 55 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL, RESISTING OFFICERS AND RECEIVING, TRANSPORTING AND SELLING LIQUOR. Continued for defendant, on same bond, No. 35 State vs Jonn $6115 No. 56 State vs Gladys MeLelland No, 39 State vs Lenie Williams No. 40 State vs Hugh Lee Howard io. 41 State vs Milas Archte No, 45 State vs Carlee Carson State vs Quince Shuford ee el eee sates A SE peek ee eo Thursday, Novenber 9th., 1922, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Alias Capias. LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Defendant comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty of Larceny and receiving as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, with leave to County Commissioners to hire out or work at the County Home for the Aged and Infirm, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defa€ndant comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty of larceny and receiving as cherged in the bill of indictment. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common iio of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public Roads of said county for said period with felon stripes. [LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel enters a plea of guilty of Larceny © which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the Chat DLAUVE » LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Défendant comes into open Court and enters & plea of guilty of Larceny and receiving as charged in bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said period, omnAp mR STORE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty of Store Breaking, Larceny and receiving as et in the bill of indictment. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the court that be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said County for said period with felon stripes. HOUSE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Defendant comes into Court and enters a plea of guilty of house breaking in day time and larceny and receiving, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned to work on th & county for said period, e public Roads of sai Thursday, November 9th., 1922, SECRETLY DESTROYING DEAD C I ogy sy HILD AND PROCURING The following jurors; D.L.Webb, J.L. W.M. Lentz, J.E.McKey, | & bone. D bE keeweee E.C.Absher, C,Chas, Cline, J.M.Ostwalt, M.D.. Goodman, J.B.Lippard and Vance lMcDaniels were duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict. The State put on apart of its evidence and the defendant put on apart af its evidence. The Court adjourned until Friday morn N 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, . ing, Nov. 10th This Honorable Court adjourns until Friday morning, November 10th., 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. ‘ PRIDAY;,Nowember 10th., 1922. Tis Honorable Court convened Friday morning, November 10th., 1922, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business. No, -26 State vs Len Houston Thomas Stewart Jacobs No, 42 State vs soe Eccles No. 48 State vs James A, Russell Q \ \ ‘ } i f 4 ' : ’ 4 4 { { | } { \ | | | | j } ee ee TS PRS EDS pet pes PR oe RESISTING AND OFFICER, Alias Capias as to Thomas Stewart. The defendant Len Houston comes into open Court and through his Counsel enters a plea of guilty of Resisting an officer as charged in the bill of indictment. It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant Len Houston be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said County for said period. TEMPORARY LARCENY OF AN AUTOMOBILE. Te defendant eanters a plea of guilty of temporary larceny of and Automobile as charged in the bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court the defendant John S, Jacobs be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said period. Tt is further ordered that the execution of this sentence be suspended, if the defendant be of good behavior, arid thathe be reduiréd to give bond in sum of 5100.00 for hid appearance at each November Term, 1923, 1924 and 1925, being & period of three years, to show that he has been of good behavior and not violated the orders of this Court. It is further ordered by the Court that if the defendant, John S, Jacobs shall violate thés order, then it shall be the duty of the Solicitor, end he shall, and he is so ordered to have capias issued for thé arrest of the said defendant and delivered to the jailor of the county of Iredell and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period in compliance to the above order. It is further ordered by the Court that the defendant pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, INTIMIDATING STATE WITNESS, The defendant Joe Eccles comes inti open Court and through his Counsel L.C.Caldwell enters a plea of guilty of Forcesble Trespass which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant Joe Eccles be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for 4 term of THREE (3) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period. SECRETLY DESTROYING A DEAD CHILD AND PROCURING AN ABORTION, Ea Continued over from Thursfay Nov. 9th., 1922. The jury return for their verdict that the defendant James A, Russell is guilty as ohgrged in the bill of indictment and further that they ask the mercy of the Court upon the defendant in passing sentences e No. 44 State vs Jessie Smith Gudger Barnes Ralph Hefner FRIDAY, November 10th., 1922, PREAKING SEAL OF FREIGHT CAR AND ENTER SAID CAR3 LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Each of the defendants, Jessie Smith, Gudger Barnes and Ralph Hefner comes into open Cour% end through their Counsel enter a plea of guilty of ForcéblécTrespass:which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. It is therefore; considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that_the defendants, Jessie Smith, Gudger Barnes and Ralph Hefner, and each for himself, be confined in the common jail of Iredelj County for a term of TWELVE i312) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said period. It is further ordered that the execution of thésecsentences be suspended on condition that the said defendantPbe of good vo of and further that each give sunf/ of $200.00 each for their appearan ovénber Terms, 1923 $1924 and—t0@6, be period of Taree JWo- years, to show that they,and each é6r himself, has been of good behavior and not violated the orders of this Court. It appéaring: tor thee Court that. the defendant Jessie Smith is under Sixteen years of aes a4 he weed not appear personally at above’ nam ev. Terms, provided he produce certificate frém the Superintendant of Public Welfare showing that he has heen of good behavior. It is further ordered that if the defendants, Jessie Smith, Gudger Barnes and Ralph Hefner, or either of them shall violate this order, then it shall be the duty of the Solicitor for the State, and he shall, and he. is so ordered to have Capias 4ssued for the drfest°ofsthe said defendants, or either of them, so violating the above order of good behavior delivered to the Jailor of Irédell County and assigned to work on said public roads of said county for said period in compliance to the above order, It is further ordered by the Court that each defendant in this action pay one-third (1/3) of the cost to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday morning, November 13th,, 1922, at 10:00 o'clock, A.lf. Give Presiding 1sth Judicial District. f MONDAY, NOVEMBER 135th., 1922. SECOND WEEK, NOVEMBER TERM, 1922, In the Superior Court, November ,Term, 1922, SECOND WEEK, North Caroline ,} Iredell County.} This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock, A.M, Monday morning, November 13th., 1922, when and where Has Honor, T.B.Finley, Judge Presiding for the 15th Judicial District, is present and presiding, this the second week for Criminal and civil cases at November Term, 1922. M,P.Alexander the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful me to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week for Criminal and civil cases, to-wit: D,.W.Lowrance, D,A,.Warren, T.P. Thompson, C.S,Bass, LYRE HSLKAAS, T.M.Rickert, John W, Crater, WM. Lundy, 0,0,Harwell, J.B. Johnson, D,C,Campbell, B.P.Smith, Thos. C. Crouch, F,L.Westmoreland, E.C,Johnson, Geo, A. Watts, D,C,Cowan, F.B. Elliott and C,.R, Dellinger. . The following were returned as,"Could not be found,": C.V.Ostwalt, R.R.Goodnight. The following were returnes as Sick: J, A. Yates, ‘R.B. Dobson E.F. Cass. The following were excused by the Court for the Term: W.A.Sherrill,. The Criminal docket was taken up and disposed of as follows: No. 49 State vs Harry Sherrill LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant comes into open Court and through his Counsel enters a plea of guilty of Forcible Trespass which plea was accepted by the Solicitor for the State, It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued for TWO YEARS on condétion that @afd defendant pay the cost of this action and give justified bond in sum of $200, for hid personal appearance at each May and November Term for two years to show good behavior and abide the orders of the Court. No, 40 State vs Hugh Lee Howard LARCENY AND RECEIVING, It appearing to the Court that the defendant heretofore entered a plea of guilty of Larceny, therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said defendant be confined in the common _ of Iredell County for a term of NINE ary 9) and assigned to work onthe -Pubite-Roads=ef™ xt Harn ER opal note ——— peng EP I De METIS EE pS No. 37 State vs Henry Carton No, 26 State vs Lenn Houston No e 43 State vs Beatrice Moore .MONDAY, November 135th., 1922, SECOND WEEK. MANUFACTURING AND PERMITTING LIQUOR TO BE MANUFACTURED ON HIS PREMISED, The defendant pleads not guilty. The following jurors: D.A.Warren, T,P. Thompson, C.S.Bass, T.M.Rickert, John W, Crater, W.M, Iundy, 0.0,Harwell, J.B.Johnson, D.C.Campbell, B.P,Smith, F,L.Westmoreland, E,C,Johnson, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the said defendant guilty of permitting liquor to be made on his premises, It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed bythe Court that the defendant Henry Carlton, be confined in the gommon jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said period, Upénrrendéringtofithe verdiét of tther jury Ketéin inthe: Pecordjscand before judgmentcis pronounced, the defendant in open Court through his Counsel, in the presence of the Solicitor for the State, moves to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and in the charge delivered by the Court to the jury Motion over-ruled, Prisoner excepts, Defendant excepts to judgment and appeales to the Supreme Court for errors assigned and to be assigned, Notice of appeal waived in open Court. By consent it is agreed that the defendant have 60 days in which to make and serve case on appeal and the State 60 days thereafter in which to make and serve counter case or except thereto. Appeal bond fixed at $606.00. Appearance Band« £1x6a0at.$2000,00 justified. RESISTING AN OFFICER. It appearing to the Court that the said defendant heretofore entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said term, therefore, It is considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that said sentence be suspended on the condition that said defendant be of good bo’ behavior, and further that he be required to give bond in sum of $200. for his faithful per- formance of this condition, It id further ordered by the Court that if the said defendant Lenn Houston shall violate this order, thon it shall be the duty of the Solicitor, and he shall and he is so ordered to have capias issued for the arrest of the said defendant and delivered to the jailor of the County of Iredell and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said period in compliance to the above order. It id further ordered by the Court that the said defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. CONCEALING BIRTH OF CHILD AFTER ABORTION, Defendant through her Counsel enters 4 plea of ilty of Concealing birth of child after abor- fon. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court taht defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of ONE (1) YEAR, and assigned to work e& the Home of the Aged and Infirm for Iredell County for said. period. No, 48 State vs Tames A, Russell No. 46 State vs Ivey Killian Fatty Sisk Vernon Eads { j i i ( ‘ ‘ { | | \ } { i 0 ‘ 1 ‘ : } Monday, November 13th..,. 1922. Second Week. GONCEALING BIRTH OF CHILD AND ABORTION, It appearing to the Court that the said defendent, James A, Russell was found guilty of. Concealing birth of child and abortion 8s charged in bill of indictment by verdict of jury heretofore set out in record, Therefore, It is epnstdéred; ordered and decreed by the Court that the deid defendant, James A, Russell. be imprisoned in the State prison and penitentiary at Raleigh, N.C. at hard labor for a term of TWO (2) YEARS. Upon rendering of 4 verdict of the jury herein in the record and before judgment is pronotinced, the said defendant in open Court throught his Counsel and in the presence of the Solicitor for the State, moves to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and in the charge delivered by the Court to the jury and for errors assigned and to be assigned. Motiom over- ruled, Defendant excepts. Defendant excepts to judgment and appeales to Supreme Court, Notice of appeal waived in open Court. By consent it is agreed that the defendant have 60 days from the beginning of this Court, the same being Nov. 6th., 1922, in which to make and serve case on appeal and the State 60 days thereafter in which to make and serve counter case or exceptions. Appeal bond fixed at $25,00.. Appearance bond fixed at $1000.00 to be justified. PREAKING SEAL OF FREIGHT CAR AND ENTER SAID CAR, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Each of the defendants, Ivey Killian, Fatty Sisk and Vernon Eads, comes into open Court and enters 4 plea of Forcible Trespass which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. It is therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said defendants, Ivey Killian, Fatty Sisk and Vernon Eads, and each for himself, be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said period, It is further ordered that the execution of the above mentioned sentences against said deféndants be, and the same are hereby suspended on condition that the said defendants, and each for himself be of good behavior and further that each aéfendent bs recoghizéd in a bond in the sum of $100.00 for their personal appearance at May and November Terms, 1923961924 and-2085, the same being a period of Pep. years, to show #hat theyvand each for himself, has been of good pehavior and not violated the orders of this Court. It is further opdered that if the defendants, Ivey Killian, “atty Sisk and Vernon Eads, or either of them shall violate this order, then it shall be the duty of the Solicitor for the State, and he shall, and he is so ordered to have Capias issued for the arrest of the said defendants, or éither of them, so violating the above order of good behavior delivered to the Jailor of Iredell Coumty and rs to work on said public roads of said county ea period in compliance to the above order. ms is further ordered by the Court that each ms defen ant in this action pay one-third 91/35) of @ cost to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. MONDAY, November, 15th., 1922, Second Week, _ REPORT OF GRAND JURY, TO THE HONORABLE, TO.B, FINLEY, PRESIDING JUDGE, IREDELL SUPERIOR COURT, NOVEMBER TERM} 1922, We the Grand Jury for the Nov. Term, 1922 of Iredell Superiod Court beg leave to submit the following report: After having acted on all bills and transacted other routine business, we visited by committee the office of Clerk of the Superior Court, Sheriff, Treasurer, Register of Deeds and County Supt. of PubbiesSchools and find all offices neatly kept. We also visited the County Jail and found 16 prisoners; 5 white males; 9 Col. males; 2 Col. females, They said they were well fed and cared for. The jail in good sanitary condition. We recommend that the bars near sink be painted (We desire to call the attention of county Commissioners to the floor in main hall of Court House be leveled up and repaired near South door also). We also visited County Home, found inmates: 15 white females; 9 white males; 8 Col. Females; 7 Col. Males, Total 59. Well cared for, plenty to eat, home in sanitary condition, well kept. We also visited by Committee County Chain Gang, found 6 white males, 14 colored Males; 12 males in good condition, 2 guards. Found quarters good, new tent, well fed and clothed, well cared for. Nov. 10th., 1922. S.A, Padgett Foreman Grand Jury. No, 24 J.0,Wilcox q vs i Robert MceDaniels and § Erve Speaks ~ swe It pSpearing to the Court that the pleadings in the above: entitled Solan tee been lost and cannot be found: It is ordered by consent, that the parties to this action, substitute new pleadings for the ones lost. | ,.B, Finley Judge Presiding. Thin Honorable Court adjourns until Tuesday morning » November 14th., 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14th,, 1922, This Honorable Court convened Tuesday morning, November 14th., 1922, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business. 1 of Railroads § Jury sworn and empannelled Jas, C, bere ee —* for their verdict, Compan, Jurors withdraw and Cleveland Manufacturing Comp y mistrial taken, Parties allowed 350 days in which to amend pleadings, No.:23 Director General of Railroad emi uiataie { Continued Statesville Venesr Co. No, 58 ‘s he 4 States Yasua O« United Sta vy Continued for Defendant vs Statesville Cotton Oil Co. No. 30 Sherrill Lumber Co,, et al ; vs : : Continued by consent. E.S.Goodin, et al No, 50 W.C, Perry The following jurors: 0,.0,.Harwell, J.M. Taylor, vs W.M.Gaither, L.B.Lee, J.B. Johnston, L.B. Moore, Southern Railway Co. C,A.Bass, J.B, Elliott, T,M,Rickert, C.R. Dellinger, F.H.Goodin and E.N.Gillehand, being duly sworn smd empannelled for their verdict, This being Wednesday, Nov. 15th, 1922, the case was begun and continued over to Thursday Nov. 16th trial in progress from Nov. 16th 2B and continued to Saturday night Nov. 18th, 1922. The jury answered the issues as follows: No, 50 W.C, Perry vs Southern Railway Co. oie Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: YES otis Yas the plaintiff guilty of contributary negligence as alleged in the answer ? fmaswer: No. -IIiI- What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover ? Finswer : $128.00. No, 50 North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court Tredell County. | November Term, 1922, : WC. Perry { vs d JSJUDGHNUEN T&T, Southern Railway Co, | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, T,.B,Finley, Judge, and a jury, and being heard, and the jury having answered the issues submitted by the Court as set out in the lg gee BC ne plaintiff and gainst the defendant, and 00) s damage at ‘ assessed ge at One Hundred and Twenty Eight ($128 It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of t28-00 With interest thereom at six per cent. per annum from November 6th., 1922, until paid, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. T.B.Finl F Sida WeeleMg NOVEMBER TERM, 1922, Noe 38 ‘ State } LARCENY AND RECEIVING, vs { Nol Prosed With Leave, Milas Weaver t No. 80 Nola Sherrill Carpenter 4 vs F,A,Carpenter 1, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for five years next preceeding the conmencement 6frthiseaction 7 . Anaswer: YES 2, Were the plaintiff and defendant intermarried as alleged in the complaint 7? Answer: Yes. 3 Have pleintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for five consecutive years from the commencement of this action ? Anaswer: Yes. eer No. 80 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } November Term, 1922, Nola Sherrill Carpenter | vs 4 JUDGMENT setting aside verdict. F,A,Carpenter } This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that this 1s an action for divorce and that the jury has answered the issues submitted to them as set out in the record in favor of the plaintiff: It further appearing affirmatively from the pleadings and proof that six months has not elapsed since the conclusion of the five years separation alleged as cause of divorce, prior to the filing of the complaint. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged upon motion of counsel for the plaintiff that the verdict rendered in this case be, and the same is hereby set aside and a new trial of the cause granted, ?.B,Pinley Wide Presiding. ZO? No. 64. North Carolina, 0 In the Superior Court, Tredel1 County. | November Term, 1922. J.L,.0wens i a { JUDGMEN T. S.L.O0vercash and I.c.Overcash | This cause coming on to be heard before Judge, T.B. Finley, ond being heard and it appearing that the amount sued on and the cost have been paid: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action be dismissed. T.B. Finley wuage Presiding. No. 42 lorth Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Tredell County.| November Term, 1922. Philips-Jones Corporation 4 \ vs \ SuDGMu ESE Tf. { 6 Kelly Clothing Co. of liooresville This cause coming on to be heard before Judge, T.B. Finley and being heard and it appearing that the plaintiff desire to take a voluntary non-suit: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby non-suited; That the cost be taxed against the plaintiff. T.B.Finley Judge rresiding. No, 41 Hooresville lotor Co. | vs i J.R.carson | 4 In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff ? Answer: $158.58 and interest on 4150.00 from June 15th., 1921 to the date that $9.56 check was tiendered. The cost of action to be divided equally between the plaintiff and the defendant, No, 41. North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 * November: Term, 1922, Mooresville Motor Co. § ‘ i 4 This cause coming on to be heard before Judge T.B. Finley and a jury and the following issue heing submitted and the answer of the jury thereto being as herein set out, giz:"What amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff ? Ans, $159.58 and interest on $150.00 from June 15th., 1921 to the date that $9.58 check was tendered, The cost of the action to be dividéc equally between the plaintiff and the defendant," It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-ONE and 98/100 Dollars and that the cost be divided equally between the plaintiff and defendant. The judgment of the Court has been complied with by paying plaintiff $152.40 and $9.58 paid into Court. T.B, Finley guage Presiding. NOVEMBER TERM, 1922 J.H. Mackie { 1. In what amount, if any, is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff 7 Answer: $418.74 with interest at 6% from Oct. 18th, 1920. 2, In what amount, if any, is the defendant entitled to recover on his counter claim ? Answer: Nothing. No, 354 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Tredel1 County. | November Term, 1922, G.L,Meimight 4 vs { J.H. Mackie This cause coming on to be heard before Judge, T.B.Finley, and a jury and being heard and the jury heaving answered the issue in favor of the plaintiff finding that the defendant in the sum of $418.74 with interest from Oct. 18th., 19203 It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTEEN AND 74/100 DOLLARS, with interest from Oct, 18th., 1920 at six per cent. and that the defendant pay the cost to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. T,B. Finley Judge Fresiding. November Term, No. 47 Nortn Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § November Term, 1922, rirst National Bank of Rocky Mount, Va. VS. ] : j : 4 I E, E. Harrington ist. What amount, if any, is defendant indebted to Plaintiff? Aneaswer: $1450 with interest from Sept, 12th., 1921, subject to credit $652.24 given May 8th., 1922, No, 47 Norty Carolina, t InvobhecSuperior Court, Tredell ndeie | November Term, 1922, First National Bank of } Rocky Mount, Vae } " VWBe ! DGMENT. £5, Harrington : This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T.B. Finley, Judge, and a jury, and the following issue having been submitted and found by the jury as follows: "ist, what amount, if eny, is defendant indebted to plaintiff? Ans, 31450.00 with interest from Septomber 12th, 1921, to credit of $632.24, given liay 8th, 1922," It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the . Plaintiff recover of the defendant the sun of Fourteen Hundred & Fifty Dollars, and interest on said amount from the 12th day of September, 1921, until paid, subject to credit of 5632.24 given May 8th, 1922, It is further ordered and adjudged that plaintiff recover the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, This November 15th., 1922. T.B. Finley ___—__—_____— udge Presiding. A I AP ED November Term, 1922. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court Tredel1 County.} Before the Clerk. J.E.Critz, Adm. of Mrs. Iula Carmichael VS JUDGEMENT OF NON-SUITZ eg BEFORE CLERK. Esther Horn Critz, Admx, Tn the above entitled case plaintiff comes into Court and takes a voluntary non-suit, the defendant having paid plaintiff indebtedness set out in the complaint. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that plaintidd's action be, and the same is, hereby ron-suited; and it is further considered and adjudged that the plaintiff pey the cost in this action. J.A,Hartness ees Clerk Superior Court. ApDpmrm CORREO Ts rier & Grier _ Attorneys for plainvilf, YOO YY DED RD APRRIREBS YOY OY OND VPRDDPDLPIRAALDAPAD No, 46 State FREIGHT CAR BREAKING, LARCENY AND RE EILVING. vs Nol Prosed With Leave. Fred Clark No. 46 State FREIGHT CAR BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVED vs } Nol Prosed With Leave, Walter Clark No. 19. North setae In the Superior Court, TIredel}, County. November Term, 1922, Carolina.Motor Co, 4 VS. t JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT, N.V. Long i It appearing to the Court that the palintiff and defendant have compromised and settled their difference,, cherefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited and that said plaintiff pay the costs of this as tion to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, T.B.Finl Sadie Prev. eo ks November Term, 1925, North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredel1 County. November Term, 1922, willie Nicholson { VS. i JUDGNENT Lora Nicholson This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T.B,Finley, Judge, and a jury and the following issues having been submitted to the jury: 1st Was the plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina for five consecutive years preceding the commencement of this action ? Ans, Yes, nd; Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint ? Ans. 3rd: Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action ? Ans, Yes. It appearing to the Court that the jury having answered all the issues in favor of the plaintiff: [It is therefore ordered, decreed and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved absolutely, and the plaintiff and defendant are absolutely divorced, It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. T.B. Finley Judge Presiding. Saturday, Nov, 18th., 1922, November Term, 1922, No, 40 North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell Couhty.! November Term, 1922, W.L, Cook 4 vs t JUDGMENT, W.D.King and W.H.King 4 This cause coming on to be heard before Judge, T,B.Finley, and it appearing that all matter in controversey have been settled out of Court: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action be dismissed and that the cost be taxed against the plaintiff, T,.B. Finley dsudge fresiding. No. 65 lorth Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Tredell County. 4 November Term, 1922, W.P.,Carpenter 4 vs JUDGHENT. S.L.Overcash | This cause com@ng on to be heard before Judge, T.B. Finley and being heard and it appearing that the amount sued on and the cost have been paid: If is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action be dismissed, T.B.Finley Judge ‘residing. North Carolina } In the Superior Court, ? . Iredel1 County} Before the Clerk, Carolina Motor Company vs M.B.Cashion, M.A, Cashion and Z,V, Cashion Tis cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Tredel1 County, on the 18th day of December, 1922, the same being the third Monday of said month, and it appearing to the Court, that summons in this action was issued on the 24th day of August, 1922, and served on the defendants, M.B,Cashion and M,A,Cashion, on the 26th day of August, 1922, but was never served on the defendent, Z.V.Cashion, and that the return date as set forth in said summons was on the 5th day of September, 1922, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in said action on the 4th day of September, 1 e2, and that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1021.15 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the lst day of November, 1921, until paid, and that said amount is due on a promissory note, being a stated and certain amount, and that said defendants, or neither of them, has filed an answer to said complaint: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, l,B,Cashion and M.A,Cashion, the sum of $1021.15 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from t¥Je lst day of November, 1921, until paid, and the said defendants to pay the eosts of this action: It is further ordered and adjudged that this cause be non-suited as to Z.V.Ceashion, the other defendant. This the 18th day of December, 1922, J.A,Hartness Clerk Superior Court, North Carolina, 4 | In the Superior Court, Tredel1 County.| ~ Before the Clerk. Carolina Motor Company vs. JUDGMEN T. Margaret Williams and Joseph Williems This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on the 18th day of Dec, 1922, the same being the third Monday 6ff said month, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 14th day of June, 1922, and served only on the defendant, Margaret Williams, and that the return date set forth in said summons was onethe 26th day of June, 1922, and thet same was served on Margaret Williams on the 23rd day of June, 1922, and that the plaintiff filed a verified complaint on the 22nd day of June, 1922, and that the defendant, Margaret Williams, is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $300.00 and onterest on same at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 15th day of January, 1922, until paid, and that said amount is due the plaintiff by the defendant on two promissory noges executed by said defendant, “argaret Williams, and that said defendant has failed and neglected to file an answer to the compalint: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this cause be, on motion of Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys for plaintiff, non-suited as to the defendant, Joseph Williams, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, Margaret Williams, the sum of Three Hundfed and no/100 Dollars, and interest on same at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 15th day rof January, 1922, until paid, and that the said defendant, Margeret Williams, pay the costs of this action. This the 18th day of December, 1922, J. A. Hartness erk Superior Court, Nort, Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredel} County. | Before the Clerk. Carolina Motor Company vs irs, Ola Summers Litaker This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court, on the 18th dey of December, 1922, the same being the third Monday of said month, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was issued on the 14th day of November, 1922, and was served on said defendant, on the 15th day of Vovenber, 1922, and that the return date as set forth in said summons was on the 27th day of November, 1922, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint on the 25th day of November, 1922, and that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $590,00 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 17th day of November, 1921, umtil paid, and said amount is due on two promissory notes, the amounts being stated certain amounts, and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file an answer to said complaint: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $590.00 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 17th day of November, 1921, until paid, and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. This the 18th day of December, 1922, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court. Nortn Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) Before the Clerk, Carolina, Motor Company § vs i JUDGMENT. J.W.Webb and H.F,.Heath | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard pefore Je&.Havbness,cClerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, state of North Carolina, on the 18th day of December, 1922, the same bein the third Monday of said month, and it appearing to the Court that the swumons in this action was issued on the 10th day of June, 1922, and served on the 15th day of said month on said defendants, and that the retrun day as set forth in said summons was on the 22nd day of June, 1922, and that the plaintiff filed a verified complaint in said action on the 2lst dy of June, 1922, and that the defendants are indebted and are due the plaintiff the sums of $134.70 and interest on same from the 13th day of June, 1922, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and the sum of $200.00 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 20th day of December, 1921, until peid, and that said amounts are due on notes, the same being stated certain amounts, and that the defendants have failed and neglected to file an answer or denmur to said complaint: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants: lst. the Sum of $134.70 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 13th day of June, 1922, until paid, 2nd, The sum of $200.00 and interest thereon from the 2lst day of December, 1921, wntil paid at the mate of six per cent per annum, Srd, That the defendants pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 18th day of December, 1922, J, A. Hartness Clerk Superior court. 2 t Nortyn Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk, Jan, 15th., 1928, J.B, Parks,and 0,G,Sills, trading as | J.B, arks & CO. i vs JUDGMENT, Ye Q Marsh Howard, B.P,Smith and ' i I.N, aine This cause coming on to be heard upon the complaint duly verified and it appearing to the Court that said cause of action is founded upon a note under seal, dated September ,13th, 1921, in the sum of 5300,00 and interest on same, the complaint was duly filed and the summons duly served on the defendants. And the defendant Marsh Howard having failed to enswer the complaint. It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendant Marsh Howard by default. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover from the defendant Marsh Howard, the sum of $312.76, together with interest from December 2nd., 1922, until paid and the cost of action, J.A,Hartness ee ei a Clerk of the Superior Court. This the 15th day of January, 1925. CNY. YY ONO YY YY AYN OY OY AICY NOL AYOV ANY aKa COBO WOQDEDOGOOSGALOBIDNK AN x ny YoY; a JORIS y y , X A PA JFBOQOQOWGOABSAAGAVGOVGSOOOBGIGO North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | Before the Clerk, Statesville Lumber Co, VS. Knox Upholstery Co. This cause coming on to be heard before J.A, Hertness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was issued on the 24th day of Nov., 1922 and was served on the defendant on the 27th day of Nov, 1922, said summons being returnable on the llth day of December, 1922, and it appearing further to the Court that complaint was filed on the 26th day of Dec., 1922, said complaint being properly verified, and it appearing further that said cause of action was based on a promissory note executed by the defendant and it appearing further that no answer to said complaint has been filed and that 20 days have elapsed from the filing of said comphaint ; It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $645.90, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the 17th day of July, 1922 until paid and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This the 15th day of January, 1925. JA, Hartness COCCECCECE FOZGGBBIBE@SGISSI. BQGAGIAGH YIDBIGBATAOAIGILBO MONDAY, JANUARY 29th., 1925. North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | January Term, 1923, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolina, on the $thiMonday before the lst Monday in March, 1925, the same being the 29th day of January, A.D, 1925, when end where His Honor, J.L.Webb, Judge Presiding, is present and presiding and the Hon, Zeb, V. Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, M,P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names’ of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the First week of this term, to-wit: The following were drawn as Grand Jurors for the term: T,S,Williamson, L.G,Brotherton, W.d.Morrison, J.E,Burton, P,W,Suther, J.P, Austin, C.A.Freeze, A.L.Sides, D,M, Templeton, J.T.Smith, A.M.Guy, J.B.Bradford, J.B.Morrow, C,G,Caldwell, C.S, Johnson, W.W. Thompson and J,W,Hobbs. T,S,Williamson was sworn as Foremen of the Grand Jury. 0,B,Lazenby was sworn as Officer of the Grand Jury. The following were returned, "Not to be found", R,H,Browmy J.H,Sherrtl1, J.E.Brookshire, E.L.Wilson and R.C,Gilleland, h.A.Cooper C.L.Poston, WouP,Morton, Dr. C.M. Bess, The following were returned sitk or with siclmess in the family: B.P.,Kestler and A,P.Clark, The following were excused by the Court: C,.H,Brom. The following were returned and sworn as Petty Jurors for the week: L.F,Scott, L.F.Warren, J,L.Reid, T.W,Woodside, li.L. Davis, C.W,White, The following were picked up and sworn as Tales jurors for the week: L.R.Smith, J,A,Rayle, W.A,Moore, 3,A,Reavis, H.C. Dellinger, T.F, Elliott, fhloh Rogers Ho, 1) tete vs avid Honeycutt Bo, 12 State vs Gaither Hays No e Lo State v8 Thomas Stewort No, 14 State vs ‘ Raymond Allison Tredell anda Wilkes Counties. KI LARCENY AHD RECEIVING. ( > wa + wo Ahoy Js isusein tailty usu 1 fihes/ shoves TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued under former order, STORE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING. TQ SHOW GOOD BEHRAVIOR, Continued under former order, HAVING LIQUOR FOR SALE. TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued under former orderk, RESISTING AN OFFICER, Alias Capias, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILb, Continued mmiime on same bond for defendant. Monday, January 29th., 1925, No. 15 State vs Raymond Allison No a 16 State vs Raymond Allison Wo, 17 State vs Raymond Allison State _vs Raymond Allison No, 19 State vs John Selis No, 20 State vs James A, Russell Ho, 21 State vs Everett “ayvault No. 22 State Vs a a . ackson lioore No, 27 State vs elton Shoemaker No, 32 State vs Robert Phifer John licCoy No. 23 State vs gohn Morrison em Williams -_ SS Re oe A a RESIDING AN OFFICER. Continued on same bond for defendant. RESISTING AN OFFICER, Continued on same bond for defendant, RESEIVE, TRANSPORT AND SELL WHISKEY, Continued on same bond for defendant, RECEIVE, TRANSPORT AND SELL LIQUOR, Continued on same bond for defendant. ASSAULT WITH’ DEADLY WEAPON, Alias Capias, ABORTION, Pending in the Supreme Court. Continued, LARCENY, fp nae Paid Larceny. Alias Capias, FORCEBLE TRESPASS. Continued, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendants plead not guilty. The following jurors: L.F.Scott, L.F.Warren, I.L.Reid, T.W. Woodside, li.L.Vevis, C.W,White, L.R.Smith, J.A.Rayle, W.A.Moore, J.A,Reavis, H.C, Dellinger T.F?7Elliott, after being duly sworn and empan- nelled for their verdict say they find each of the defendant guilty of Larceny and Receiving. CEREIGHT CAR BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Each of the defendants come into open Court and eanter a plea of guilty of Freight Carr Breaking, Larceny and Receiving as charged in the bill of indictment, Monday, Januery e9th., 925. Nog. 24 and 25 State vs Willie Mae Caldwell FORGING CHECKS, Cases No. 24 and 25 was consolidated for trial, Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No. 2 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of Forging checks in No, 25 and ask the mercy of the Court in passing sentence, Verdict in No, 24 not This Honorable Court adjourns until Tuesday morning, Januery 30th., 1925, at 9:30 o'clock, A.I.. C Fwige Presiding. Fa ‘it ak Ul TUESDAY, JANUARY SOth., 1925, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment, Tuesday morning, January 30th., 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, . 28 arate RECEIVING AND HAVING AN UNLAWFUL QUANTITY OF WHISKEY, The defendant, Dock Bailey LU PP tL open Court and through his cote LA Ss the finding of a bill of indictment and enters a plea of guilty of receiving and having an unlawful quantity of spirituous liguors as charged in warrant, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant, Dock Yailey be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of Iredell County for said period, vs Dock Bailey No, 32 State vs Robert Phifer John licCoy LARCENY AND RECEIVING, It appearing to the Court that the defendants, Robert Phifer and John licCoy having been tried and convicted by a jury on lManday, January 29th, 1923 for Larceny and receiving, therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that each of the defendants, Robert Phifer and John McCoy, be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and each assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, ‘ { f } : i | i i : i ; : Nos, oO and 31 state vs Robert Phifer John McCoy LARCENY AND RECEIVING, The cases Nos, 30 and 31 is consolidated for trial and judgment by consent by Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor for the State and L,C,Caldwell Counsel for the defendants, The defendants through their counsel 6nuters a plea of guilty of larceny and receiving as charged in the bill of indictment. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that each of the defendants, Robert Phifer and John licCoy be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of mo (2) MONTHS, and each assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, said sentences to begin at the expiration of sentences in Nos .d2 Pe OM Be AI A Pe pe CE NS No, 25 State vs Willie Mae Caldwell FORGING CHECK It appearing to the Court that the defendant was convicted by a jury on Jan. 29th.,, 1923, @% this term of forging & check to the vaule of $9.00 as charged in the bill of indictment, therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant, Willie Mae Caldwell be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, with leave to the County Commissioners to hire out. TUESDAY, JANUARY 30th., 1923, TUESDAY, JANUARY 3O0th., 1925. No. 20 State vs John Morrison Sem Williams William McLellanc Hidrey ~alton Aeron Morrison FREIGHT CAR BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, It appearing to the Court that the defendants No. 37 : John uorrisen and Sam Williams came into optans. State OPERATION AUTOMOBILE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE Court on Monday, Jan, 29th., 1923, of thid term vs OF LIQUOR. and entered a plea of guilty of Freight Car 7 0,c,Ollred Defendant comes into open Court and enters Breaking, Larceny and Receiving as charged in ‘ a plea of guilty as charged in the bill of the bill of indictment, therefore, indictment. Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendants, John Morrison and Sam Williams, ana each for himself be confined in the common $att No. 26 jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) State MONTHS, ond assigned to work on the Public A vs Roads of said county for said period, W411 Turner Tt appearing to the Court that William MeLelland, Hidrey Dalton and Aaron Morrison indicted in this case for Larceny, are boys under sixteen years of age, and that being so, this Court has no juisdiction; it is thorefore, ordered by the Court that this BaxE case be transferred to the Juvenile Court of this county, to-wit: before the Clerk of this Court, in order that such action may be tgken in the case as the Juvenile Judge méy proper. Tt is further ordered py the Court that the defendants appear This Konorable Court adjourns until Wednesday pefore the said Juvenile Judge on the 15th day of Feb., 1925. morning, January 3lst,, 1925, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M! Ae No, 28 A cit e (J State PROSTITUTION, i whew vs Defendant pleads not guilty. The follow- C >~fudge Presiding. I.L. Stewart jurors :cF.H.Sighan, Wi¥. Alexan er, G.M,Young, se. I.u.Taylor, J.P.Williems, A.F. aither, L.Ii. Gaither, A.A. @urher, Jas. Ll. Reid, J.C,Bost, E.E.Shaver and C,A,Wise, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of Prostitution. LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant through his counsel L.C,’aldwell pleads not guilty. The following jurors; W.L, Davis, C.W,White, T.W,Woodside, H.H,. Sigman, L.R,Smith, D.N,Alexander, J.A.Reavis, L.F.Scott, Z.V.Alexander, L.F,Warren, H.C. Dellinger and T,F,Elliott, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict: The evidence woes heard for the State and defendant and argument made for the State and defence, the Court then adjourned until Wednesday morning, Jen, OLSbe » 1923. pee HE I NE NN EE EO A PE AE aE se IS BS ek PE EP OE DE ME TE ES Ot BE et I peed ee A I eee pee pas OY OC \ 4 i ‘ i { { ) GETTING FIRE TO JAIL IN TWO COUNTS. The cases Nos, 53 and 55 are consolidated for trial by consent by the Solicitor for the State and the Counsel for the defendant and further treated as one bill of {ndictment with two counts, The defendant through his counsel enters a plea of not guilty. The following jurors; E.A,lassey, H.H. Sigman, “as, L, Reid, C.A,Wise, W.A, Moore, I.L.Reid, J,A.Rayle, J,C.Bost, J.M, Taylor, A.A, Turner, A.F,YVaither, and E,.E,.Shaver after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty as charged in the {ndictment for attempting to burn the Jmedell County jail in two counts, No, 21 State LARCENY, vs fi Nol Prosed, Everett Davault No, 56 State OPERATING AUTOMOBILE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE vs OF LIQUOR, R.L,.Nalls The defendant comes into Court and enters @ plea of guilty as charg of inkittent; arged in the bill This Honorab Wednesday, January Slst,, 1925. le Court convened according to adjournment 925, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. on Wednesday morning, January 3list., 1920, for the dispatch of business. No. 26 State vs Will Turner Now. S7 State vs O.C.Ollred 4, Co &, ahd / No. 358 State vs Clyde Sherrill No. 22 State vs Jackson Moore pee BEd EE I OE OE AE OE EI EN IS LARCENY AND RECEIVING. This case was concluded by the Court charging the jury and the jury after deliberating for some time find for their verdict that the defendant is not guilty of +arceny as set out in the bill of indictment but say they find the defendant guilty of receiving stolen goods knowing them to have been stolen. It appearing to the Court that the prope:ty received by the defendant was of value less than 20,00, that is, that part of the property Sdentified, and hence the offense of which the defendant was convicted is a misdemeanor. Tt is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of 350,00 and cost of this action to be taxcd by the Clerk of this Court. OPERATING AUTOMOBILE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF Pm) TT, VULL a aa e t appearing to the Court that the defendant came into open Court on Jan, SOth, 1925 of this term and entere plea of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment; It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay e fine of $50,00 and the cost of this action and further that he give bond in sum of “200. for his appearance at each criminel term of Court for two years and show the rourt that he has not been under the influence, iquor. OPERATING AUTOMOBILE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR, It appearing to the Court that the defendant came into open Court on Jan, SOth., 1923, of this term and entered a plea of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment: ‘ It is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and cost of this action and further that he give bond in the sum of $200.00 for his appearance at each criminal term of the Court for two years and show the court that he has not been under the influence of liquor. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, efendant ceme into open Court and enters & plea of guilty of assault with deadly weapon 4s charge in the bill of indictment. It ts ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Three 43) months, ans assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period, —$ 7 e MAL, No. 6 State vs Eli Privette No, 35 and 35 State vs JI.L. Stewart W NO~e 28 state vs r.1 Celie: Stewart Wednesday, January Sist., 1925. peed Ct MED pe SE IG IN I EN TE IE NE OE EE SS A NS EO Le EE ee EE 4 pt A CE pe pe pe PE EE Ee ee RE EE pe ee ee RETAILING LIQUOR, It is ordered by the Court that this case be continued and Capias is to issue to May Term, 1925. ATTEMPTING TO BURN IREDELL COUNTY JAIL. It appearing to the Court that the defendant was found guilty of Attempting to burn the Iredell County Jail, on January 23~H and 26th,, 1925, and these two offenses having been consolidated by consent Bx amnxsnt of counsel for the State and for the defendant, after bills of indictment by Grand Jury finding true bills and theated as one indictment with TWO Counts, to-wit: the first. count charging to burning Tredell County Jail Jan, 23, 1925, and SECOND COUNT charring to burning Iredel1 County Jail Jan, 26th., 1923, the jury having found the defendant guilty on the TWO COUNTS in bill of indictment, It is therefore ordered by the Court <nat on the FIRST COUNT that the defendant be imprisoned in the County Jail for EIGHT (8) MONTHS to be, assigned to work upon the public roads of Iredell County, and it is ordered by the Court that on the SECOND COUNT that defendant be imprisoned in the County Jail for EIGHT (8) MONTHS to be assigned to work upon the public roads of Iredell County. This sentence to take effect immediately at the expiration of the eight months sentence imposed on the first count. PROSTITUTION, The jury having convicted the defendant for prostitutior.: It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the County Jail for SIX (6) MONTHS to be assigned to work on the public roads of Iredell County. This sentence to take effect immediately after the expiration of the sentence umposed “byrtne Court adn-the*SECOND COUNT in the cases Nos. 35 and 35 in the bill of indictment charging the defend- ant with intent to bwn the jail of Iredell County. It appearing to the Court from the evidence before it that the defendant is probably guilty of living in adultry in Caldwell County with a young girl by the nane of Johnsie Spencer. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant pe required to give bond in the sum of {500,00 for his appearance to answer such charge. JANUARY TERMZ 1925. REPORT OF GRAND JURY: To the Superior Court of Iredell County] . } Judge J,L.Webb, Judge Presiding. 4 ~* ae We the Grend Jury of January Term of Iredell Superior Court 1923, beg leave to submit the following report: We have passed upon all bills sent us by the Solicitor &énd made return of the same to the Court. WEDNESDAY, JANUARY Slst., 1925, We visited the jail by committee end found eight males prisoners and eight colored males. We find the jail in a sanitary condition. le recommend that all holes in wall of said jail be repaired, Also portion of cells be re-painted. Te visited the Chain Gang and find Twenty-three prisoners, six white and seventeen colored, The prisoners on being questioned, say that they are well cared for and the fare is satisfactory. Everything is in good condition, Also we find twelve mules in good condition. COUNTY HOME, We visited the County Home by committee. 12 Thirty-one inmates in all, five white meles, Fiftten white females, Six colored males and Five colored females. There are two prisoners working on the farm. The inmates stated thet they were well fed, comfortably clothed and treated kindly. We found every thing in good sanitary condition, , committee of our body investigated the several offices of the Court House and find the records properly kept as pest they could judge, also the offices are being in good condition. submitted, this Slst dey of January, A.D c.5.Willé&amson Foreman. North Caroline, Iredell County C. M. Ostwalt 4 vs Judgment N.C. Sherrill jf This case coming on to be heard at this, the January Term 1922 of Iredell Superior Court, his Honor, Judge J. L. Webb presiding, and it appearing that the Defendant has made satisfactory settlement with Plaintiff for amount sued for, Be it therefore adjudged that the plaintiff, C. li. Ostwalt be taxed with all costs. Jas. Le Webb Jan. 29th, 1923 Judge Presiding GO SE COUR ECEE CECEGEE SECC ECEESS WEDENSDAY, JANUARY 3lst, 1923. North Garolins, In the Superior Court Iredell Sounty January Term, 1923 L. B. Patterson ) vs, ) Judgment C. H. Kiutz and others ) Tis cause coming on to be heard at the January Term, 1922 of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Jas. L. Webb, Judge sresiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has come into Court and asked to be permitted to take a voluntary nonsuit. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be and he is hereby nonsuited. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Jas. L. Webb dudge rresiding. CECE CE MS CEE GE EGE GGG North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County, January Term 1923» J. Ke Lambert ) vs ) JUDGMENT Bula A. Lambert ) This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor J. L. Webb, Judge presiding, and a jury, and being heard, and the Court having submitted to the jury the following is- sues, and the jury having ans ered said issues, 4s follows, towit: 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry, and are they now husband and wife, as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes II. Is plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina, and has he been a resident of said State for two years immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in this action, as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes III. ‘Did the defendant commit adultery, 4s alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plain- tiff and the defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved. J. L. Webb ——“yadge Presiding scstetseaca ttm asasa ila i in ana imine WEDENSDAY, Jan. Sls$, 1923 the Superior Court North Carolins, im P 3 Iredell County January Term, 192 J. kK. lambert J vs ‘ ISSUES Zula 4. Lambert | 1. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry, and are they now husband aud wife, 98 alleged in the complaint? ans. Yes Il. Is plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina, and has he been a resident of said Stete for two years immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in tnis action, as alleged in tne complaint? ans. Yes III. Did the defendant commit adultery, as alleged in the complaint? Anse Ye@Se North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County Blizabeth Kilpatrick $ vs Issues. Natt Kilpatrick { lst. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry 4&5 alleged in the complaint? ans. Yes 2nd. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five yeérs next prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. 3rd. dave the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for more than five successive years next prior to the filing of the complaint in this action as alleged in the complaint and was the separation the fault of tne defendant. Ans. YeSe North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County . Elizabeth Kilpatrick {4 vs JUDGMENT Watt Kilpetrick t This Cause coming on to be heard at this term of Gourt before his Honor James L. Webb, Judge ‘residing and a jury, and the jury nav ing answered the issues as follows, towit: lst. Did theplaintiff and defendant intermarry 4s alleged in WEDENSDAY, Jan. Zlst, 1923 the complaint? ANs. Yes. 2, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next prior to the commencement of this action? Ans. Yes. 3, Have the plaintiff ard defendant lived separate and apart for more than five successive years next prior tc the filing of the complaint in this action &s alleged in the complaint and was the separation the fault of the defendant? Ans. Yes. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defendant be ‘and the same are hereby dissolved. Jase L. Webb Judge Presiding. NORTH CARCLINA SUPERIOR COURT TERM, Jan. 1923 IREDELL COUNTY Palva Golden {4 vs ISSUES. Les Golden i PIRST. Did the plaintiff Falva Golden and the defendant Lee Golden intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. SECOND: Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and commit adultery with Maggie Eccles? ans. Yes. THIRD: Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for two years next proceeding the filing of her complaint? 4ns. Yes. CGE CESSERECEEES @O6 EGEEEE CES LECE WEDENSDAY, Jan. Slst, 19235 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1926 Anderson Bros., Cons liaated Co's. J Ince, vs JUDGMENT. 7 / ~ ( No. 33 and 35 (Tne ptriveg bo Srhlh : } é It is ordered by the Court that the sentence heretofore imposed in these cases is stricken out and. the following made: It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the State's Prison at hard labor for not more than two years and not less than fifteen months. State .. Miller ’ ‘ Vs. Je Le Stewart This cause coming on to be heard at this the January, 1923 term of Iredell Superior Court, before His Honor, Jas. L. Webb Judge Presiding, and a dury, end it apovearing to the Court that the ent by default and inquiry was entered in this cause by the Clerk Judgm of the Superior Court on the 9th day of October, 1922, the inquiry oe OO OO OO OOO OO OO OO OO instituted at this term of court before tne court and a jury, and that jury be tneir verdict naving found that the defendant is in- It is ordered by the Court that the debted to the plaintiff in tne sum of $420.28, with interest thereon tofore imposed be stricken out and ¢ ; made: It is ordered by the Court th from the 9th day of December, 1920, until paid: | defendant be imprisoned in the State’ four months at hard labor, this senten< Nnereupon, it is considered and ordered by the Court that , effect immediately on the expiration of the sentence imposed in #33 and #35. The Court the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $420.28 with in- as a fact that there is good reason to fear j } an attempt might be made to relesse the prisoner terest thereon from the 9th day of December , 1920, until paid, to=- 4 from the chain gang if he should be s - 5 the chain gang of Iredell county, and gether with the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of Court, under Section 1362 of the Revised \ of North Carolina, sentences the defendant to this Court. the State's Prison. + Ne L. Webb Judge rresiding. cree North Carolina, SUPERIOR COURT TERM,Jan. 1923 Iredell County Haywood Chambers { a vs ISSUES. Mary Lee Chambers | FIRST. Da the plaintiff Haywood Chambers and the defendant Mary Lee Chambers intermarry as alleges in the complaint? Ans. Yes. SECOND: Have the lived separate and apart for five successive years prior to the filing of this his complaint and was such separation the fault of defendant. Ans. Yes. ee ‘ five THIRD: Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for +™s years next preceeding this the filing of his complaint? Ans. Yes. ——————— eee et i scamenui eae a eee North Carolina, | In the Supector Court, Tredelj County. | Before the Clerk, Anderson Bros, Consolidated Co, Inc, | vs } | JUDGHENT BY DEFAULT ANF rInqutRy, T.A,Miller j , This cause coming on to be heard on the records and pleadings, and it appearing therefppm that the defendant has been duly served with summons and has filed no answer or demurrer to the compleint, although the time for filing such pleadings has elapsed; and it further appearing from the pleadings that this action is brought to recover the value of goods, wares, and merchandise sold by the plaintiff to defendant, as set out in the schedule and invoices attached to and made a part of said complaint: WHEREUPON, 1% is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the value of said goods, wares and merch- andise, and to that end, it is ordered by the Court that an inquiry be had by a jury at the next term of this Court (or so soon there- after as the same can be brought to the attention of the Court) to ascertain the value of said goods, wares, and merchandise, Thereupon this cause is continued for further pleadings, This the 9th day of October, 1922, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior No. 66 orth C S North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County, j January Term, 1923, WeH,Smith } v3 f JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT, R.L.Smith | It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have settled their differences by compromise: Therefore . 2 It is ordered by the Court thet the plaintiff be nonsesuited and that said plaintiff be taxed with the cost to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, Jas, L, Webb udge ‘residing, WEDENSDAY, Jan. Slst, 192% arolina, f Horth © . SUPERIOR COURT TERM, January 1923, Iredell County | Chambers ) Haywood ) JUDGMENT. v8 Mery Lee Chambers ) Mis cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor, de L. Webb, Judge Presiding and jury, and the jury for thair verdict having answered the issued submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the marriage between Haywood Chambers and Mary Lee Chambers be and the sume is hereby disolved and they are hereby divorced from the ponds of matrimony existing between then. Jas. L. Webb Judge Presiding. GSeCAGGEGCEECEE CGE LGSe CGEGECEE North Carolina, Jf SUPERIOR COUPT TERM, 1922 January. Iredell County § Falva Golden vs JUDGMENT Lee Golden This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor, J. L. Webb, Judge presiding and jury, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the marriage between Plava Golden and Lee Golden be and the same is hereby dissolved and they sre hereby divorced from the bonds of matrimony existing between them. Jas. L. Webb Judge rresiding. GOGEECECEGECERECECE CAGESEEEE« . CEGECEGCE No, 8 een Carolina, | In the Superior Court, edel) County, | January Term, 1923, Kincaid Bros, f JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT vs Harry Watkins Lumber Co, der It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and heten eae have adjudted their differences, therefore, it is ered that the plaintiff be non-suited and that said Plaintiff pay the cost the Clerk of this Court, of this action to be taxed by JANYARY TERM, 1925. No. 26 North Carolina, | Tredell County. } In the Superior Court, January Term, 1925, William Osborne vs } Bessie Morrison Osborne | JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff failed to come into Court and prosecute his action, therefore, It is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited and that said plaintiff be taxed with the cost in this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, No, 55 Paragon fg. Co. | vs }) JUDGMENT MiecHONxREh: REMANDING TO CLERK, .D. Littlejohn It is ordered by the Court that this case be remanded back to the Clerk of this Court, No, 75 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredeli County, } January Term, 1923, W.M.Miller { VS SUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT, L.S.Stikeleather 4 It appearing to the Court that plaintiff and defendant have settled their differences, and plaintiff ask that he be allowed to take a voluntary oo’ Lids rpel it wig prdered by he Court that the plaintiff be non-suited nd taxed with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, No,<78 J,E,Sloop | vs 1) JUDGMENT REMANDING TO CLERK C.E.Yaniels 4 It is ordered by the Court that this cas a ae ok e be remanded to No, 41 C.D, Moore It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff ee : failed to prosecute his action, therefore, Dixie Mills Co, et al it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that plaintiff be sone ed and pay the cost, No. 47 roe Shoe Co, ieee ee to the Court that plaintiff ae alled to prosecute his action, therefore D.N,McLelland it is ordered that plaintiff be non-suited and pay the cost of this action, Ng. 55 lite 144holson It/appearing gate Couyt that plaingiff : Se fdiled to pr¢s his-ection, therfore, , son it Js ordered by Court that plaintiff be Non-suited and p cost, 4 No, 58 permeates Live Stock Co, It appearing to the Court that plaintiff ae <sauee ae us failed to prosecute his action, there- ve. ° a fore, it is ordered that plaintiff be non-suited and pay the cost, No, 54 State vs Donnie Holland Frenk Adams JANUARY TERMZ 1925, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, A true bill not found, Jortn Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredel 1 County. 0 Before the Clerk, A. Y. Alexander VS. M,Cooper, R.A, Cooper ond Fred ‘‘amsey This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before J.A,Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredelj County, State of Nortn Caroline, on the 19th day of February, 19205, the same being the third Monday of said month, and it appearing to the Court that a summons in action was issued on the 12th day of January, 1925, and personally served on all three of said defendants on said date, and that the return date set forth in said summons was on the curd day of January, 1925, and that the filed a duly verified comphaint in said action on the of January, 1925, and that the defendants are indebted to 700,00 and interest thereon at the annum from the 27th day of ijay, 1922 until due on a promissory note, being certain and stated amou nd thet the defendnats have failed and nerlected file an answer or demur to the complaint: therefore, ordered and adjudged that the recover of the defendants the sun of Seven Hundred (700,00) Dollars and interest thereon at the rate per cent per annum from the 27th day of May, 1922 until and that said defendants pay the costs of this action to Lerk, the 19th day of February, 1923, J. A, Hartness ae of the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredel1 County. | Before the Clerk, H.H, Yount trading and doing {| business under the firm and | style neme of Yount hiotor 4 JUDGMENT we i HM, L, Jones This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before James A, Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on the 19th day of February, 1925, the same being the 3rd Monday in said month, and it appearing to the Court that swmons in this action was issued on the 4th day of January, 1923, and personally served on defendant on the 4th day of Jenuary, 1923, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in this action on the Sth day of January, 1925, and that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of 8057.75 and interest thereon, at the rate of 6 % per annun, from the 18th day of September, 1922, until paid, and that said amount is due on two notes, being for a certain stated amount, and that the defendant has failed to file an answer or demur to said complaint: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $257.75, and interest thereon, at the rate of 6 % per annum, from the 18th day of September, 1922, until paid, and further that the defendant pay the cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk, This the 19th day of February, 1925, J. A, Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. MONDAY, MARCH l2th., 1925, Nortn Carolina, } In the Superior Court, larch Term, 1923, Iredell County. } One week, Civil Cases only. Be it remembered that a Superior Court befun and held in and for the county of Iredell, State of North Carolina, on the lst Monday after the lst Monday in March, 1923, the same being the 12th day of March, A.D, 1925, and Court convening at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., when and where His Honor, James L, Webb, Judge Presiding for the 15th Judicial District, is present and presiding for one week for Civil cases only. Mi. P. Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for this Term, for one week, Civil cases only, to-wit: C,A,Litton, k.G.Johnston, J.5. Moore, Joe E, Murdock, W.L.Benfield, Ralph Brawley, li.A,Beaver, J.A.Motley, T.L.Stikeleather, H.L.Swann, W.F.Pressly, J.M.Gatton, J.B,Marshamm, J.I.Guy, G.W.Rankin, R.C. McConnell, Te following Jurors were returned, "Not to be Found," WR, Harris, L.G.Brotherton, R.D.Speaks, L.E.Reid, and C,C,.Morrison, 3,C, Joyner was returned,"Dead," A,2.Brawley was returned out of the,"State," and C,E,Milholland was returned out of the, "County." Ralph Brawley was excused for the Term on the account of sickmess in his fanily. ; The following motions and orders was made; to-wit: No, 12 W.C)Johnston, et al vs Continued F,H,.Shoaf No, 24 Brady Brinting Co, vs Continued by consent J. P, Burns No, 39 WeW.Xkeankin Co, v8 Continued GA, Martin No, 60. Annie Beaver, Admx vs Continued, HewDewitt Mills, et al No, 67 lieKnight Auto Co, vs Continued consent Doggett-lioss Motor Co, 7 MONDAY, MARCH 12th., 1925, No, 71 RN. Penland vs Academy Shops lifg. Co. Continued, Wo, '76 Jas,C,Davis, Director General of haillways vs, I,Kk.Morrison Gro, & Pro, Co. Vontinued, All NON-JURY cases were continued, except those compromised and those where the plaintiff takes a voluntary nonwsulit, The following cases were disposed of byvtrial before a jury: WT 4 iO 73 North Varolina,+ In the Superior Court, Iredell County, liarch Term, 1923, Charles Eury vs Les UBS Esther li, Hury 1. Did plaintiff anf defendant marry as alleged in the Complaint ? Answer, YES. Be id defendant commit adultry as alleged in the Complaint Answer, YES 5, sas plaintiff been a resident of the State for two years prior to the bringing of this action ? A ete a Answer, LES, No. 75 liorth Varolina,| in the Superior Court, Iredell County,) March Term, 1923, Charles Eury { vs JUDGMENT Esther NM. Eury eer This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court -efore His Honor, vas, L, Webb, Judge and a jury, and being heard and the jury have found the issued submitted,in favor of the plaintiff; that defendant committed adultry, aihcetnn Seelasa ts eit that the bonds of matrimony xis , e h Laint and } 1 i cea ROM Usage, t d defendant be, and the same Jasf{ L. Webb Judge Presiding, Monday, March 12th., 1925, Wo, 55. aia North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Tredelj County. | Maren Term, 1923, Ethel L, Kemp | SSUES G.W. Kemp 4 lst: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint 7? Answer, Yes? 2nd; Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, ‘Yes, 3rd: as the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the starting of this action ? Answer, Yes, No, 35 North Carolina, Iredell County. In the Superior Court, March Term, 1925, VS DECREE GRANTING DIVORCE, t { Ethel L. “emp G. W. Kemp } This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, J.L.Webb, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury for their verdict having answered the issued submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant had committed adultry as alleged in the complaint: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the marriage between the plaintiff, Ethel L. Semp, and defendant G.W.Kkemp be, and the same is hereby dissolved, and the said parties thereto be, and they are hereby divorced from the bonds of matrimony. Let the cost be taxed to this plaintiff. The childwen of plaintiff are given and awarded to the plaintiff until the further orders of this Court, this after due inquiry. Jas. L, Webb vuage +residing {fn 15th Judicial District, North Varolina,]} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | March Term, 1923, A,L. Aldridge ' we } Tee U8 s8, irs, E.M. Aldridge | lst, Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry, as alleged inhthe*Complaint ? ANSWER; Yes, ~ ing! at 2nd, Had thesplaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for more?than-five successive years before the bringing of this action ? AISWER: Yes. ord, Has there been a separation between plaintiff and defendant, and have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for five successive years before the bringing of this action ? ANSWER: No, If so, was said separation without fault of the Plaintiff ? ANSWER: This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, March 13th,, 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. i Tuesday, March 135th., 1925. This Honorable Court convehed Tuesday morning, March 1Sth,, D.A. 1923, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. for the dispateh of business, iJ tie No, 17 J.K.HMorrison Grocery & Produce Co, VS. { Continued Florida Citrus Exchange No, 41 Morris & Co. vs . Continued W.A.Evans & Co. William Wallace vs Continued American Railwey Express Co, No, 44 Wt, Drum vs Continued Hutton & Bourbonnais. Co, No, 40 R.F.Gwaltney, et a Continued tio, 78 U.S,ndwards, et al vs Continued E.M. Yount No, 16 Nort, Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredel, County. | March Term, 1923, James W, Brawley } vs 4 ee Oe ee J.H. Bailey 4 7 TW This cause coming to be heard at this term before His Honor, ee aT acces ce that the defendant has satisfied he and tha he plaintiff, no 1 le ing against the defendant; : : ee It is, therefore, ordered 1d adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed and that the e : smisse 1 ast 4 t the defendant by the Clerk of this Court, be taxed agains Jas. L. Webb f No. 33 erence ee Nortn Carolina,| ~ “Te the Seoneaes tae Iredell County. | Manoh ‘re ices J,C,Brookshire and J,A, Per Pardn a vVehe er trading as, Brookshire & Srey ‘ vs Statesville Lumber Co, This cause coming on to be heard at the Merch Term, 1923, of the estate. oak : sepeamiusie tt before His Honor, Jas, 1 aaa Judge e Cour have settled and compromised their atttevemace pleintiiee Geer: It is ordered defendant the sum of suttestecee’ ‘het the ‘plaintiffs recover of the Seven and 21/100 Dol} the costs of this action, the r ars and one-half of “ 1 one~ paid by the plaintiffs to be t eo ng — of the At be BY CONSENT: Tatent eet met Concneri end Long & Jurney, atty's for plaintirrs B.P.Grier and Dorman Thompson, Atty'3* for Defés i : JUDGMENT Tuesday, March 15th,, 1925, March Term, 19235. North. Carolina ,| In the Superior Court, Ipede1l County. March Term, 1923, It appearing to the Court that William Thomas ee presented in open Court a license to practice law issuefl by the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina, dated thei29th day of January, A.D, 1923, and that the Court at the request of Hon, John G, Lewis, Attoriey, administered to him the oath to support the Constitution of the State of North Carolina, the cath to support the Constitution of the United States, and the oath of an Attorney and Counselor at law, It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said William Thomas Wicholsof, be, and he is hereby admitted to the practice of the ProSfession of law of the Courts of the State of North Carolina, It is further ordered by the Court that a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread upon the Minutes of this Court, This the 15th day of March, A.D, 1923, “~ fei DO. uate sue Judge Presiding 15th Judicfal District, North Yarolina, |} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | liarch Term, 1925, I, William Thomas Nicholson, Jr., do solemnly swear that I will support the constitution of the United States; SO help me, GOD, William Thomas Nicholson, Jr. Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, this the 13th day of March, 1923. Taio pe ia st. of L5th I, William Thomas Nicholson, Jr., do solemnly and Sincerely swear that I will be failthful and bear true allegiance to the State of North Carolina, and to the Constitutional Powers and authorities which are or may be established for the 80vernment thereof? and that I will endeavor to support, maintain - @nd defend the Constitution of the United States, to the best of my lmowledge and ability; So help me, God, = : Tuesday, March 13th,, 1923, William Thomas Nicholson, Jr. Sworn to and subscribed betore me in open Court, this the 13th day of Narch, A.D, 1925. Jas, L, Webb ‘ Tudge ‘residing end holding Courts of 15th Judicial District. I, William Thomas Nicholson, Jr., do swear that I will truly and honestly demean myself in the practice of an Attorney, according to the best of my knowledge and ability; So help me, God, William Thomas Nicholson, Sworn to and Subscribed before me in open Court, this the 15th day of March, A.D, 1925, Jas, L. Webb cudge Presiding and holding Courts of the 15th Judicial District. \SQSCOCOBOBOGQ WOSOGBRIBO@ North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | liarch Term, 1923, It appearing to the Court that John Lawson Davis has presented in open Court a license to practice law issued by the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina, Dated the 29th day of January, A.D, 1923, and that the Court at the request of Hon, John G, Lewis, Attorney, administered to him the oath to support the Constitution of the State of North Carolina, the oath to support the Constitution of the United States, and the oath of an Attorney and Counselor at Law, It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said John Lawson Davis be, and he is hereby admitted to the practice of the profession of Law of the Courts > — It is further ordered by the Court that a record of the of the State of Nort, Carolina, proceedings taken herein be spread upon the Iinutes of this Court. This the 13th day of March, A. D; 1923, wr iv Muesday, March 13th., 1923, North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Tredel1 County. | March Term, 1923, I, John Lawson Vavis, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the Unitod States; So help me, God, John Lawson Davis Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, this the 135th day of March, 1923, Jas. L, Webb age res ng an Oo ng e Courts of the 15th Judicial Districts. I, John Lawson Davis, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I will be failthful and bear true allegiance to the State of North, Carolina, and to the constitutional powers and authorities which are or may be established for the government thereof; and that I will endeavor to support, maintain and defend the constitution of said state, not inconsistent with the constitution of the United States, to the best of my knowledge and ability; So help me, God, John Lawson Davis Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, this the 15th day of March, 1923, Jas, L, Webb Judge Presiding and holding the — Courts of the 15th Judicial District, I, John Lawson Davis, do swear that I will truly and honestly demean myself in the practice of an Attorney, according to the best of my knowledge and ability; So help me, God, John Lawson Davis Sworn to and subscribed before me in open Court, this the 13th day of March, 1923. Jas. L, Webb Judge Presiding and holding the Courts of the 15th Judicial District, Sees: fe 8 Fac IHRM HEHEHE HESS aa we Pi.8: “ SE St SF SF St 30 SF Se 38, Se A We I RS NN This Honorable Court adjourns until Wednesday morning, March 14th., 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. Lz Btn WI2ZBA— Wednesday, March 14th., 1923, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment at 9:30 o'clock, A,l,, on Wedneaday morning, larch 14th,., 1923 ‘for the dispatch of business. No, 77 James ¥!, Brown vs Continued by consent, H. C, Hunter No, 26 ; North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term, 1923, A f 2 3 i A,L,Alcdridge 4 vs rs, £.M. Aldridge This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, James L, Webb, and a jury, and being heard upon the whole record, the jury having answered the issue, "Nas there been a separation between the plaintiff and the defendant, and have the plaintiff anc defendant lived apart for five successive years before the bringing of this action," NOs It is therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover nothing because of h&ka&csaid action and that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are, hereby cintinued in full force and effect, [t is further considered by the Court that the Jlaintiff pay the cost to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Jas, L, Webb Judge Presiding, No, 45 liorth Carolina} In the Superior Court, Tredell County. 1) Before the Clerk, United States Casualty Co, }§ vs otatesville Cotton O11 Co, | - ist. In what amount is the gaféndant indebted to the plaintiff ? Answer, 204,27 with interest from Feb, 12th, 1922. end, In what amount, if any, is the plaintiff indebted to the defendant on account of its counter claim ? Answer, Nothing, NO, 45 North Carolina, | In the S 2 Iredell County,.} ne Superior Court, uarch Term, 1923, United States Casualty Co, § i JUDGMEN Statesville Cotton 011 Co, GM NT This cause coming on to be heard at thi t f His Honor, J.L.Webb, Judge Presidin a s term before 3 a 43 ee &» and a and having answered the issues submitted to Liga bh botaeer oe Ne. a the hiendliie s In what amount is the defendant indebted to Answer, (204.27, with interest from Feb, 12th, 1922. end, In what amount, if 4s t indebted to the defendant on aces Of Ga hee ount Answer, Nothing, of its counter claim ? Wednesday, March 14th., 1925, It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of TWO HUNDRED AND FOUR DOLLARS AND 27/100 ($204.27), with interest thereon from Februery 1i2th., 1922, until paid, Tt 1s further adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the costs of this action, Jas, L, Viebb Judge Presiding Mer 45 United States Casualty Co. Ve Statesville Cotton Oil Company. Motion for new trial. Motion overruled Judgment. #xception. Defendant appeals tc Court. Notice of appeal waived. ybO.00. By agreement of counsel and ir Court, defendant is allowed sixty day: W : i a ae aa up his case on appeal and the pleintiff sllowe after said case is accepted or served on him to exceptions or countercase. ue Ce. Ivey Vs Town of Mooresville. q 2 +h s — ne agdiscr SY 4 Ww At the close of all the evidence ir Court intimated the opinion to the plainti could not recover and could not get alonr. the plaintiff takeg a non-suit and epoeals Court. Notice of appeal waived. Apveal bond ~i00. : - oe By agreement of counsel and in th discration of Court, the plaintiff is allowed th days in which make up and serve case on appes ° ‘eme Court and defendant allowed thirty days after : 2 acceptance of said case to file countercase < This Honorable Court adjourns until Thursday morning, March 15th., 19235, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M. Sa a WE he. ie Be Presiding. Thursday, March 15th,, 1925, This Honorable Court convened Thursday morning, March 15th., 1923, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, No. 59 eck Maggie Hartle meee v Continued, Hillard jiartley No, 65 ‘ ; ; Mrs, Eula C, Wilson, Admx, of H.C,VWiilson, deceased vs Continued Southern itailway Co. No, 65 Mary &, Lisk, Admx, of ; deceased vs Continued by consent Torn of Mooresville De Je No. 66 L.P,Claywell vs Continued by consent Smith Hallman ‘ No. 35 A.,T.Rhinehardt, Admr, of J.P.Rhinehardt, deceased vs Mooresville Cotton liills It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in this action has failed to make up case within time prescribed by law and by consent. It is ordered by the Court that this case be, and the same is hereby dismissed according to former judgment, ‘ j ' i f 4 \ { No, 58 W.eH. Wood vs Mooresville Cotton liills Co, The jury having come into Court at 4:50 P.M, and stated to the Court that it as impossible to agree on 4 verdict in this case and each juror Stated to the Court that they could not agree and that there was no chance to agree upon a verdict: It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that a juror be withdram and a mistrial ordered, It is ordered by the Court that all cases not otherwise disposed of are continued to next term, No. 23 Harteé \atson be { NON-SUIT JUDGMEN’ Harold» Watson j o DGMENT ’ fre cause coming on to be heard Court that tt and it appearing to the ete. the plaintiff comes into Court and takes a voluntary It is ordered th suited and that thog pay “an © Court that the plaintiffa be non- Court. he cast to be taxed by the Clerk of this Thursday, March 15th., 19235, No. 7 : J.N.Kinceid, H,L,.Kincaid, W,I,Steele, P.M.Barger, J.V.Barger and C,E.¥arger, | Partners, doing business under the firm | name of Kincaid & Barger { NON-SUIT JUDGMENT vs } J.A.Gibson and wife, Ada Gibson } This cause coming to be heard before His Honor, Jas, L. Webb, Judge Presiding and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs desire to take a voluntary non-suit: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be, and the same is hereby non-suited; that the cost be taxed against the plaintiffs, No, 29 Josie Bradshaw 4} vs 4 JUDGKENT OF NON-SUIT Guy Bradshaw { This cause coming to be heard before His Honor, Jas, L, Webb, Judge Presiding and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the Attorney in this action ig_unable to locate his client and desires to take a voluntary non-suit: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be, and the same is hereby non-suited; that the cost be taxed against the plaintiff. No, 34 Mae Steadman \ vs { JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT John Steadman { This cause coming to be heard before His Honor, Jas, L. Webb, Judge Presiding and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the Attorney for the plaintiff in this action is unable to locate his client and desires to take a voluntary non-suit: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be, and the same is hereby non-suited; that the cost be taxed against the plaintiff. Thurdday, March 15th., 1925 10. . »H. Thompso vs JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT S.E,Miller This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Jas, L. Webb, Judge Presiding and being heard and it appearing to the court that the take a voluntary non-suit; therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that this action be and the same is hereby non-suited: That the cost be taxed against tne plaintiff, In the Superior Court, rch Term, 1923, veneer Co, Nis cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court Honor, James L, Webb, and being heard and it appearing that in controversy have been settled and that the cost is to vided equally between the plaintifi and defendant: 4 is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action be, same is hereby dismissed and it is further ordered that the cost be taxed by the Clerk to be paid one-half by the plaintiff and one-half by defendant, Jas. L. Webb oudge Presiding No, 39 North Carolina, } : In the Superior Court, Iredel, County. arch Term, 1923, W.W,Rankin Co, | vs G. A. Martin oe This cuuse coming on to be heard before Webb end being heard and it appearing tI : ) ; that a1] ma Ps Ss having been settled out of Court: 7 wae See It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action be, and UD His Honor, James L, the same is hereby dismissed and it is further red } cost be paid by the plaintiff urther ordered that the Jas, L. Webb Judge Presiding Thursday, March 15th., 1923, No, 51 Nortn Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. March Term, 1923, vs Torm of Mooresville This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, James L. Webb, and a jury and being heard and upon the intimation of the Court at the close of all the evidence that pleintiff was not entitled to recover, the plaintiff took a voluntary non-suit and appealed to the Supreme Court: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the action be and the same is hereby nonesuited and that the cost be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk Court. gas, L. Webb Judge presiding, GREAT ro liO0g OE North Yarolina,|} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | March Term, 1923, Lillie Pierce VS i Glenn Lipe This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor, J.L.Webb, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties, plaintiff and defendant, have settled the same out of Court and adjusted all their differences in the matter for a consideration agreed upon by the parties, which consideration has been paid: It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that a non-suit be entered and the costs paid by the defendant. Jas, L, Webb Judge ‘residing. BY CONSENT; - a 2.V. Turlington & L,C,Caldwell, Atty's for Plaintiff R.1, Weatherman & P,S,Carlton, Atty's for defendant. Thursdey, March 15th,, 1923, No. 50 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § March Term, 1923, Statesville Lumber Co. | t E. Brom 4 This cause coming on to be heard at the March Term, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, L. Webb, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court the parties have settled and compromised the matters and things in controvery between them: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court thet the plaintiff recover nothing and that the plaintiff pay Be SIGN Te a2 EPS the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, L,. Webb ae ge Presiding, This Honorable Court adjourns Sine Die. ZX, WETK, yreeclen, North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. Worth Carolina In the Superior Court, oe ‘| Before the Clerk, Tredell County. | liarch 19th., 1925. J.D,.Gra by his next friend Jo, UF ant J » i ore c.C,Grant e COMA TIL Mm VS CONSENT JUDGMENT S This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Rocky Face Spinning Company s S : a ; itis . ° sie! on the lst Monday in January, 1925, same being the First day of January, 1925, and it appearing to the Court thet the plaintiff This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to oo z ae : in this action filed a verified complaint and that this is an vies thereto have compromised their differences: i action brought upon 2 promissory note for an amount certain, and tnerefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that ; : oe i : : : it further appearing to the Court that the defendant has not Grant recover of the defendant the sum of Seventy-five Dollars i , . filed any answer within twenty days after the return date named iis Hospital expenses of ‘3100.00 and the cost of this action : er oor ee in the summons, and that said return date has not been extended, acainst the defendant, his j “meni Ss in accordance : ; 7 and the defendant having failed t compromise by the parties to this action. March 19th 1923 os a +.e 3g wh e : : ; : x the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of {400.00 and J, A, Hartness ve e > » a” {2 ae = Clerx Superior Court. interest thereon from the 12th day of July, 1916, until paid, together with the costs of this action to 1 red by this Court. This January lst., 1923. Ce J. A, Hoartness rlaintifi erk ouperior Court, liocky +ace spinning Co, ee ek eaiaeaaieeeonen erendant rr Buren Jurney Attorney for derendant John A. Scott, Jr, Attorney for Plaintiizt. North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. R.N. Penland t vs JUDGNENT Academy Shops iifg. Co. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Court, and being heard on this the First Monday of April, 1923, upon the record and statement of the parties that all matters of difference existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, growing out of the matters and things alleged in the complaint, as well as all other matters of whatsoever nature, have been compromised and settled, ; It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the Plaintiff take nothing by his writ, and that defendant pay the cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This April 2nd,, 1923, J.A,Hartness Clerk Superior court of Tredell Co. BY CONSENT: Lewis & Lewis Attorneys for plaintirrr— Grier & Grier torneys for defendant— Nort; Carolina, | In the Justice of the Peace Court, , - 7 . Vy ¥ ad 7 Tredel1 County. | Before W. J. Lazenby, J.P. George VW, Long ' vs M.V.Vibert,. trading as \ Vibert Air “ale Dog Kennels } Tis cause coming on to be heard before W. J. Lazenby, J.P, of Statesville Township, Iredell County, on the Slst day of llarch, 1923, and being heard upon the evidence offered by the plaintiff, the defendant having failed to appear and answer; the Court finds as facts; That notice of this action and the issuance Ss ond warrant of attachment, stating the names of the parties, the amount of the claim and the nature of the action and requiring the def'endant to appear at the time and place named and answer or demurr to the complaint, has been duly published as the law directs, Second, Th he summons and warrant of attachment issued in this action has been duly served by said publication, tt 1 Thé i of garnishment duly served upon the Southeastern Express Company at Statesville, N.C, and the proceeds of a soOllectic in the net amount of %50,00 was levied upon b7 he Sheriff and that the garnishee appeared and answered pon oath as it was required to do, that it had in its possession t} belonging to the defendant, therefore, upon hearing of the evidenc is £ stendant having failed to appear and rails and adjudged that the plaintiff recover * &50,.00 and the costs of this action, nd adjudged by the Court that judgment be rendered yneastern xpress Company and V.E,Lackey its manager ‘or the amount of .'50.00, said judgment to be _ 1 upon the payment into the Court of the said sum of. 550,00 wourneastern Express Company. 1is t Sls ay of .liarch, 1923. wv. Jd. Lazenby me Seat uustice of tne peace. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Before the Clerk, Carolina Motor Company 4 vs ! JUDGMENT C, B. Stewart { This cause coming on to be heard before J,A,Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel1 County, and bin heard on the end day of April, 1923, the same being the first Monday of said month, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action, was iddued by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell on the 28th day of February, 1923, and served by personal service on the Sth day of March, 1925, and that plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint on the 27th, day of liarch, 1923, and that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $300.00 and interest on xa™mB same from the 18th day of October, 1922, until paid, and that said debt is due on note, the same being an action brought for the collection of a stated and certain amount, and that the defendant has failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to said complaint: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the a of $506;00 ane intenont thereon from the 18th. day of October, 1922, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court This April 2nd,, 1923, . J. A, Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Nortn Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredel1 County. } Before the Clerk, Grose vs Cooper and R.A,Cooper Ihis cause coming on to be heard and being heard before J. A, Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on the 16th day of April, 1925, the same being the third Monday in said month, and it appearing to the ( x that suwmnmons in this action was issued on the 15th day of “arch, 1925, and served on said defendants, on the 15th day ’ March, 1925, and the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in said action on the 20th. and that return day as set forth in said summons was on the 24th day of March, 1925, and that said action is brought to collect on a promissory note, the amount being a ated certain amount, and that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff on said note in the sum of $1500.00 and interest thereon from the day of September, 1921, until paid at the rate of six per ce annum, and that the said defendants have failed and neglected file an answer or demur to said complaint, and that more lays have elapsed since the return day set forth It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that plaintiff, S. Grose, recover judgment against the defendants, Cooper and R, A, Cooper, for the sum of $1500,00 and interest thereon from the 4th,, day of September, 1921, until paid at tne rate six per cent per annum, and it is further adjudged that the said defendants costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This April 16th., 19235, J. A, Hartness . Clerk of the Guperior Court of Iredell IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, MAY TERM, 1923, Moanday, May 21lst., 1923, EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. WHEREAS, The Hon. B.F.Long,; assigned by law to hold the Superior Courts of the 14th Judicial District for the SPRING Tern, 1923, and the Hon, Jas, L. Webb, assigned by law to hold the Superior Gourts of the 15th Judicial District for said SPRING Term, 1925, have agreed to exchange the Courts of the particular counties hereinafter named in their said respective districts for said SPRING Term, 1925: NOW, WHEREFORE, I, CAMERON MORRISON, Governor of the State of Nort, Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby consent to said exchange, and do hereby authorize the said Hon, B.F. Long to hold the said Courts of the County of Iredell, Two weeks, beginning May 21s., in the 15th Judicial District, in lieu of the said Jas, L. Webb for said SPRING Term, 1923; and the said Hon. Jas, L. Webb is hereby authorized to hold the said Courts of the county of Mecklenburg, Two weeks, in the 14th District, in lieu of said Hon, B.F.Long for said SPRING Term, 1925, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State to be affixed, 1 GREAT SEAL this the Fifteenth day of May, in OF THE the year of our Lord one Thousand PATE OF NORTH CAROLINA nine hundred and Twenty-three, and in the one hundred and forty seventh year of our American Independence. Cameron Morrison Governor: Wm, H. Richardson Private Sécretary M.C.T, MONDAY, MAY 2lst., 1923, Nortn Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 1! May Term, 1923, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the llth Monday after the 1st Monday in March, 1925, the same being the 2lst day of May, A.D, 1925, when and where His Honor, B, F, Long, Judge Presiding, is present and presiding, he having exchenged districts with the Hon, Jas, L, Webbs, said exchange being consented to by His Excellency Governor, Cameron Morrison by virture of authority vested in him by lar. The Hon, Zeb, V. Long, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, M.P.Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the fipst week of this term, to-wit: The following were dram as Grand Jurors for the Term: W.H.Renegar, L.C.Steele, J.Stenley Gibson, J.T.Summers, J.W.Lawrence, A,I..Jacks, W.B,Harris, J,H,Small, C.,A.Brady, R.E.Gatton, J.M.Cass, D.B.Benson, C.R.Loyd, C.F,Leckie, L.L,MeCoy, R.B.Parker, R.P.Summers and R,L, Bradford, L.C.Steele was appointed and sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. 0.B.Lazenby was sworn as officer in charge of the Grany jury. The following were returned,"Not to be found;" J.L. Ellis, E.J.Alexander, J.A.Pag@gett, J.V.Niblock, J.M.Messick, J.A.Nesbit and A,L.Wagner. J.C,Clendenin was returned as being sick and a Doctors certificate was presented certifying to his illness. The following returned and sworn as Petty Jurors for the week: J.J.Alexander, E.R.McAuley, S.S.Denny, W.H.Moore, T,L.Ervin, W.F.Browning, N.A.Beaver, Jas, H.Mayhew, H.D.Mills and C.D. Crouch, The following were picked up and sworn as Tales Jurors for the week: J.A.Snow, C.E.Redman, W.D.Woody, W.P.Salmons, J.R. McLain, L.K,Goodin, No, 12-1/2 State vs Ivey Killien Fatty (Broadus) Sisk Vernon Eads Jessie Smith Grudger Barnes Ralph Hefner No. 1 State vs Rankin Cloaninger No, 2 State vs Block Dalton No, S State vs Leonard “‘enegar No. 4 State vs Grover L. Smith No, 5 State vs Eli Privette 8 LP A EE A ed eee pe OM Monday, May 21st., 19235. TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. The defendantz Jessie Smith appeared and showed good behavior and case was continued under former order. The defendant “alph Hefner showed good behavior by certificate from the public Welfare officer Newton, N.C. as provided by former order and the case was continued under former order, The defendant Grudger Barnes’ good behavior was shown to be good in his absence but he is required to appear in person some time tithin the nex} three days, The defendants, Iv Killian, *atty Sist and Vernon Eads was called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Yapias, TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Defendant appeared and showed good behavior and this being the last time defendant was to appear, it is ordered by the Court that be discharged, STORE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Alias Capias, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, Alias Capias TO: SATISFY Cl PAs It’ appearing to the Court that the defendant at Aug. Term, 1921 was called and failed and forfeited a $500. bond, and further at Nov, Term, 1921, that said case was continued under former order on condition that he satisfy Sci Fa by paying $100. and all cost of Sei Fa and all cost of this action, therefore, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that said defendant pay $100..in _— of said Sci Fa and cost of said Sci Fa and all cost in this action. It appearifig that Sci Fa and all cost has been paid into Court therefore, it’ is ordered that said defendant be discharged, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, On motion of the Solicitor, it is ordered by the Court that this case be nol Prosed With Leave, MONDAY, MAY 2ist., 1923. No. & State vs “Cal Brown "6,7 State vs : Roscoe Holman No. 8 State vs Will H, Souther No. 9 State vs Ralph Rogers No, 10 State vs David Honeycutt No, ll State vs : Yaither Hayes Ro, i2 State vs Thomas Stewart No, 13 State vs Raymond Allison No. 14 State vs Raymond Allison No, 15 State Rvs aymond Allison No, 16 State Rv? aymond Allison No, 17 State vs Raymond Allison HAVING LIQUOR FOR Alias Capias, HAVING LIQUOR FOR Alias Capias, RETAILING LIQUOR, Alias Capias, TO APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR Continued under former order, TO APPEAR AND SHO GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued under former order, TO APPEAR AND SHOE GOOD BEHAVIOR, AT NOVEMBER TERMZ 1925, Continued under former order, RESISTING AN OFFICER. Alias Capias, Bond fixed at $300. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL. Nol Pros With Leave RESISTING AN OFFICER, Nol Pros With Leave RESISTING AN OFFICER, Nol Pros With Leave RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING AND SELLING LIQUOR, Nol Pros With Leave RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING AND SELLING LIQUOR. Nol Pros With Leave, No, 18 State vs John Sells No, 19 State vs" Jas, A, Russell Wo. Bae State _vs Yackson Moore No. 21 State vs O, C. Ads&vdd No. 25 State vs Valter Vampbell Nos, 22, 54 & 35 State S. . Ethel “allace f ‘ f j i : } i PAE Aa mee seme ed en Ae at RR ret A oa MONDAY, MAY "LST.3 1923. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Alias Capias, ABORTION, In the Supreme Court, Continued, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Nol Pros With Leave, PERJURY. Alias Capias,. HOUSEBREAKING AND ENTERING WHERE WOMEN SLEEP, Defendant through his counsél teners a plea of guilty of Forcible Trespass, which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. Upon motion of the Solicitor, it is ordered by the Court that judgment be suspended upon condition of defendants good behavior and payment of the cost in this action, BEATING BOARD BILL, eae LL: ° counsel tenders a plea of FRAT Tap de geen plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State, Upon motion of the Solicitor for the State, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspended on payment of the cost, “etailing in all three Counts, Continued for defendant on account of Siclmess of his Attorney. $1000, bond required, LARCENY AND RECEIVING OF AN AWTOMOBILE, Defendant comes into open Court and enters 2 plea of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Roy Spry be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO (2) YEARS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said — county for said term and to wear felon stripes. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO KILL AND ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON IN TWO OTHER COUNTS. we ppetendant tenders a plea of guilty of Assault With Deadly Weapon on Victor Morrison and . Morrison but enters a plea of not guilty of an’ Assault With Deadly weapon with intent to kill. The following jurors were sworn and elled for their verdict; J.J. Alexander, E.R.McAuley, 27S DRY» W.H.Moore, T,L.Ervin, W.F.Browning, -A.Boaver, Jas,H,Mayhew, J.A,Snow, C,E,Redman, W.D.Woody and H.D.Mills, The Court after hearing apart of the State's evidence, continued the case over to Buesday morning, May 22nd,, 1923. No, 37 State vs Boizy Connor MONDAY, MAY 21st,, 1923. MURDER, Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, beginning May 2lst., 1923, and sitting for the dispatch of business, this the 2lst day of May, A.D. 1925, the Grand Jury of said Court in a i Seventeen (17) Present. W.H,Renegar ha Vv ng been excused by the Foreman of the Grand Jury, returned into opem Court the following bill of indictment in words and figures as follows: ! TNDICTMENT 22. State of North Carolina,{ In the Su Iredell County THE JURORS PRESENT, That Boizy Connor late of the county MURDER, Ma: Ree Term, e BR, 1923, foR THE STATE UPON THEIR OATH for Couns t of Iredell on the 3rd day of August A,D. 1919, with forcé and arms, at and in said county aforesaid, fel malace aforeth oniously, willfully, and of his fa kill ana’murder ought, d Loyd Cloaninger contrary to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. LONG, Solicitor, !/ Endorsed on the back by the following words and figurés, t 4tNo, 37 State Against Boizy © o-wit: onnor IN! T J Thin T \\ MURDER ™“ WITNESS Dr, H.F ES - Long C.K.Morrison X W.A,.Mayhew M.M, “ampton Milas W ilson C.W. Washam John Wa Brint A S.R. Pro Joe Hon J.P. Cav R.L.Smi J.B.Smi a. o& lexander X ctor eycutt in th th Deck Craven Those marked thus X endorsed and sent by the Solicitor and sworn and exemined by me, and this bill found A TRUE BILL ' LC, Steele Foreman Grand Jury ¢ This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, May 22nd,, A.D, 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. 4 wif e 38 e ° ng this the 15th Judicial District. Z ani or + Tuesday, May 22@nd., 1925, This Honorable Court convened Tuesday morning, May .22nd,, 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, Na. 12-172 State vs Fatty (Broadus) Sisk No, 32 State Tate, (col) i@tchell Brawley No, 25 State vs Howard Houston No. 57 State vs Boizy Connor CE et EE EE pat ee CE Nd eR BE pe NE A I a RE TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, It. appearing to the Court that defendant was called and failed at this term, therefore, it is ordered, that said forfeiture be striken out. Upon affidavit mailed by Judge Yas, L. Webb, showing good behavior of the defendant in this case, it is ordered by the Court that this case be continued under former order, BIGAMY Defendant called and failed, Judgment Wisi Sci Fa and Capias, Instante Séi Fa, $500, appearance justified bond required, Stolgn goods, knowing them td be Stolen. t and \through CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Continued for defendant to next term of Court. $500, justified appearance bond required. a MURDER, By order of the Court, the defendant, Boizy Connor, in custody of M,P.,Alexander of Iredell County was brought into open Court. The defendant being represented by his Counsel R,T,Weatherman and Ly ¢@; Caldwei],Attorneys was placed upon his arraignment, — The prisoner, Boisy Connor, being at the Bar in the custody of M,P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County. The Solicitor, Zeb, V. Long, for the State having called upon the defendant to stand and hold up his right) hand, and having made know to him that he stood charged by the name of "Boizy Connor" in the indictment read to him of murder in the First Degree. Whereupon the prisoner plead not guilty and for his trial placed himself upon God end his Country. (Continued to next page) ¢ Tuesday, May 22nd., 1923, No. 37 (Continued from page 170) State The prisoner, Baizy Connor, being at the vs Bar, it is ordered by the Court that M.P,. Boizy Connor Alexender, the High Sheriff of Iredell County summons BA Spectial°veniré of FORTY good and iawful-men who ere free holders from the body of the county to appear at and be in attendance upon the Court, Wednesday, May 25rd,, AeD. 1925, at 12 o'clock Noon, and not depart fhe Court without leave, to the end that so many of them as are necessary or accepted in the trial of the above entitled action, The prisoner was then remanded to prison to await the further orders of the Court, The following is the order of the Court for the special venire of Forty good and lawful men: In the Supeperior Court, North oe May Term, 1923, Tredel, County. State of North Carolina vs Boizy Connor The prisoner, Boizy Connor, being at the bar of the Court in his own proper person, represented by his counsel, Messrs, Caldwell and Weatherman, and the State represented by the Solicitor, is arranged in due form, the indictment against him being an indictment for murder, the murder of Loyd Cloaninger; and for his plea, the prisoner pleads that he is not guilty. Whereupon, the Solicitor for the State, and counsel for the présoner consenting thereto, moves for a special venire, and It is thereupon ordered by the Court thet the High Sheriff of Iredell County summon a special venire of good and lawful men, being freeholders, to-wit: Forty veniremen, to serve as jurors, and from which a jury may be selected to try this case, the said jurors to be summoned to appear at the Courthouse in Statesville, Iredell County, at the hour of 12 M. on the 23rd day of May, 1925; and the Sheriff is required to furnish a list of the said veniremen, one list for the Clerk, one list for the Solicitor, and one list for the counsel of the prisoner, immediately after the said jurors shall have been summoned, By consent of the Solicitor and prisoner's counsel, the Sheriff will endeavor to summon jurors who reside away from the place of the homicide alleged, B. F, Long ouage Presiding. Nos. 22, 34 & 35 State { ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT TO vs a KILL AND ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON IN TWO Ethel “allace OTHER INDICTMENTS, Upon the convening of this Honorable Court this May 23rd, 1923 at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, end pending the trial of this case the defendant Ethel Wallace through her Counsel tenders to the State, the plea of guilty of Assault with a deadly weapon upon the person of Wictor Morrison; also the same plea of assault with a deadly weapon upon the person of Ernest Wallace; Also the same plea of assault with a deadly weapon upon the person of Parthenia Morrison, and these three several pleas by the defendant the Solicitor for the 1 State accepts, No. 27 State vs Mitchell Brawley ON TN A A pe A Tuesday, May 22nd,, 1923, ASSAULT ON HIS WIFE, The defendant having plead guilty in this case, the sentence of the Court is that he be imprisoned in the County Jail for a term of EIGHT (8) MONTHS and pay the costs and jail fees to be taxed hy the Clerk, The County Commissioners are authorized to assign the defendant to work during this period of tine, for ,the of paying the bill of costs, and if APE RD Yecrport his wife. The Court recommends that he be hired to I.M.Yavis, It is further ordered that order on page 170 be striken out in this case, Defendant 1@ recog- nized in the sum of 5200, to appear at August and November Criminal Térms, 1923, and show he has persons and No, 24 State vs Jim Gray No, 36 State vs Wiley Rash abide the ae IE ee et OS { { 1 { j i 4 t : { I been of good behavior towards his wife and all other other orders of the Court, RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS KNOWING THEM TO BE STOLEN, The defendant by his counsel waives the finding of a bill in this case and tenders a plea of guilty of Forcible Trespass, which plea the Solicitor accepts, and the Solicitor recommending to the Court -- after investigation of the circumstsences by himself and his associate counel, Hon. H.P. Grier, that the judgment be suspended upon the ayment of the cost. This is done and the defendant is discharged upon the condition that he pay all the costs in this case to be taxed by the Clerk. MANUFACTURING LIQUOR AND PERMITTING LIQUOR TO BE MANUFACTURING ON HIS PREMISES. “efendant enters a plea of not guily in each of the Counts, The following jurors; I.J,Alexander, Jas, H. Mayhew, N.A,Beaver, E.R,.McAuley, C.D.Crouch, S.S,Denny, C.E. Redman, W.H,Moore, V.B,Alexander,T.L.Ervin, W.D,Woody and W.F,Browning, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict sey they find the defendant not guilty in each of the counts. This Honorable Court tekes a recess until Wednesday morning, May 25rd,, 19235, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. MD ha udge Presiding.” Wednesday, May 23rd., 1923, This Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., May 25rd., 1925, for the dispatch of business, In obedience to an order heretofore made in the case No. 37, State of North Carolina vs, zy Connor, a special venire of FORTY good and Lewtur MWS Wank freeholders were summoned by My oP. Alexander, the Hin Sherif of Iredell County to appear at the Courthouse in Statesville, Iredell County, on May 23rd., 1925, at 12 olelock, Noon, as follows: is J.W.Wabb H.G.Morrison, J,0,Y“aither, S.R.Jurney, A.F.#erris, A.F. aitner, A.F.Yark, W.P,Salmon, E.A.Massey, J.E. Fox, N Spergeon Gaither, J.F.~atton, A.A,Cartner, M.S.Hedrick, G.M.Young, J.C.Bost, E.M,Hicks, J.B.Morrow, F.H.Conger, W.S, Clendenin, W.C.York, H.A.Tomlin, Q.A,Reid, J.E,Stevenson, J.L, Reid, J.L.Wike, A.H,Reece, W.C.Blaylock, J.W.Smith, G.C.Smith, J.M.Vevis, T.Scott Barkley, WM. Lundy, J.F,Wilson, Jas, L. Reid, A.A.leach, I.N.Smith, C.E,Jones, G.S,“artin and R.F,.Goodin, No. 57 State vs Boizy Connor MURDER, In obedience to an order heretofore made in this case, a special venire of FORTY good and lawful men, who are freeholders were summoned by M.P,Alexander the High Sheriff of Iredell County to appear at the Courthouse in Statesville, Iredell County, Wednesday, May 2S5rd., 1925, at 12 o'clock, Noon, The prisoner,’ Boizy Connor, beitig at the Bar in the custody of M,P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County. The Solicitor, Zeb, V. Long, for the State having called upon the prisoner to stand up and hold up his right hand, and having made known to him that he stood charged by the name of Boizy Connor, in the indictment read to him of murder in the first degree. Whereupon the prisoner plead not guilty and for his trial placed himself upon God 4nd his Country. Further the Solicitor, Zeb, V. Long, for the State asked the prisoner to stand up and hold up his right hand and warns him that,"These good men that you shall hear called are to pass between the State and you upon your life and death; if therefore, you will challenge them, or any of them, you must challenge them as they come to the book to be sworn, before they are sworn, and you shall be heard." The following jurors,,were dram from the regular jury; James H. Mayhem, E.R.McAuley and C,D.Crouch, and the following were drawn from the special veniremen: W.M.Lundy, S.R.Jurney, J.E,Stevenson, R.F.Goodin, H.G. Morrison, E.M,Hicks, J.F.Gatton, J.W.Smith and J.L,Reid, all being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict. After the State had put on apart of its evidence, the trial was continued over to Thursday morning, May 24th., 1925, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M, The prisoner was then remanded to prison to await the further orders of the Court, LR ee a A oe A A A A Ca A EE A a I RE ES I ES CD ee ME we ee - This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, May 24th., 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. Thursday, May 24the, 1923. Mis Honorable Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. , Thursday morning, May 24th., 1923, for the dispatch of business, No, 57 State vs Boizy Connor MURDER, In obedience to the order heretofore made Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. and the prisoner being at the Bar in open Court in custody of the High Sheriff of Iredell County, whose prisoner he is. After the taking al] the evidence for the State and for the Prisoner and the arguments of Solicitor and his associate John G, Lewis and the counsél for the prisoner and the charge of the Court, the following jurors: James H, Mayhew, ExR, E.R,McAuley, C.D,Crouch, W.M.Lundy, S.R.Jurney, J.,E,Stevenson, R.F,Goodin, H.G,Morrison, E.M. Hicks, J.F,“atton, J,W.Smith, and J.L,Reid returned into open Court and say for their verdict that they fine the prisoner, Boizy Connor guilty of murder in the Second Degree, being the felong whereof he stands charged, and so say all the jurors, The prisoner was then remanded back to prison to await the further orders of the Court, ee parte ce ON OL pe OT EE NE EN CE pe IS This Honorable Court takes a recess until Friday morning, May 25th., 1925, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business, 4s ' 4 nt fr C ee oS shies Presiding. Feiday, May 25th., 1923, This Honorable Court convened Fiday morning, May 25th., 1923, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business, No. 50 State vs J.D. Kelly No, 20- 1/2 State vs Boise Conner No, 37 State vs Boizy Conner No. 22 State vs Ethel Wallace RES ged ASTM pe Dre eC Te A ae A eI A PE I I I A pat Ee et SF ae aye a Se “oo peed peed eA eetgees HE EDS pS ee et eS LARCENY AND RECEIVING GOODS KNOWING THEM TO HAVE BEEN STOLEN. Defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel, C,C,Manes and John G, Lewis pleads not guilty. The following jurors: J.0,Gaither, I.J,Alexander, W.H.Moore, C.D.Crouch, W.C. Woody, N.A.Beaver, C,.E,Redman, S.S.Denny, J.R. McLain, W.F,Browning, Jas, H, Mayhew, and J.A. Snow, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant not guilty of Larceny and receiving goods knowing them to have been stolen, Ik appearing to the Court that the prisoner, J.D.Kelly, is now under sentence in Rockingham County, N.C. The order of the Court is that the prisoner be held in custody of the Sheriff of this county or any authorized Deputy and that he be conveyed to and délivered to the High Sheriff of Rockingham county, North Carolina, for the purpose of serving his sentence in that county. RESISTING AND OFFICER, The defendant through his counsel in open Court enters a plea of guilty of resisting an officer as charged in the bill of indictment, It appearing to thé Court that judgment has been pronounced in No, 37, therfore, It is ordered by the Court that this case be dtemtesed, @rlinnd ww. dodlee- Sv Gea of, Ne? he, fr Persats Othe he ft0 - i Ptr eiD ae Soy lijeuo Aer~ Me? fivtete MURDER, It appearing to the Court that the jury returned a verdict of murder in the Second Degree, which said verdict is of record in this Court, therefore, It is ordered by the Court that the prisoner, Boizy Conner be imprisoned in the State Prison a&t-hard labor for aterm of: TWENTYSFIVE (25) YEARS, fo ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, It appearing to the Court that defendant entered a plea of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon upon Victor Morrison which plea which plea was accepted by the Solicitor for the State, therefore, The sentence of the Court is that she be imprisoned in the jail for six months with leave to the County Commissioners to assign her to work during the term of her imprigon~- ment at the county Home for the Aged and Infirm of Iredell County, N.C. Feiday, May 26th., 1923. ae Judgment having been pronounced in No, 22 vs judgment in this case is suspended on condition Ethel Wallace that the defendant be of good behavior and judgement may be pronounced hereafter at any time within two years from the 25th day of May, 1925, unless she shall be of good behavior, No, 35 o.. state Judgment having been pronounced in No, 22, vs judgment in this case is suspended on condition Ethel Wallace that the defendant be of good behavior and judgment may be pronounced hereafter at any time within two years from the 26th day of May, 1925, unless she shall be of good behavior, No, 32 North Carolina,{ In the Superior Court, State of N.C. {| Iredell County. May Term, 1923, vs 0 Joe Tate,principal] SUD GEA 2 JR Maynerd, { surety. { It appearing in the above case that the defendant failed to appear to stand his trial, that he was called out and failed to answer and that a Sci Fa was issued to run against said defendant and his bondsman J, R, Maynard; And it further appearing to the Court that the said Sci Fa was duly served upon the said bondsman, J, R. Maynard, and it further appearing that no answer has been filed in this Court to said Sci Fa by said J, R. Maynard; Now, Therefore, it 4g ordered, adjudged and decreed by- the Court that the said bond of $200. for the appearance of said Joe Tate 4t this term of Superior Court be and the same is hereby forfeited, and this judgment mace absolute against said Joe Tate, defendant and his surety J, R.!) Maynard, B. F. Long Judge Presiding, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday morning, May 28th., 1923, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. a? re ig ee T/, ¢«§ LK Budge fresiding,. * Monday, May 28th,, 1925. Second: week, Iredell Superior Court, Before, B. f, Long, Judge Presiding, North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | May Term, 1923, Second Week, This‘ Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock, A.M,, Monday morning, May 28th., 1923, when and where His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding for the Fifteenth Judicial District, is present and presiding, this the Second week for Civil cases at May Term, 1925, M,P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, Nort, Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week for civil cases, to-wit: T.Scott Barkley, R,L.Cook, A.F,Gaithe, Cornelius L., MeHargue, W.C. Thompson, M.H.Sigman, R,L, Alexander, JoM. Lipe, J.B. Troutman, F.A.Sherrill, J.E,Hendren, J.H,Ketchie, R.L. Feimster, N.A,Eidson, J.C.Crawford, The following was returned as and "Not to be found,"; James Sherrill, John Pharr/ A.B.Williams; J.G, Joyner was returned as not in the County; A.G.Mills and JeA, Bost. was excused on the account of business relations; and J.S, Templeton was returned as being sick. No, 2 LiEllis Hayes, Admr. of M,L,Campbell vs Continued by consent Columbus Campbell No, 3 Mrs, Louise Hayes vs Continued by consent Columbus Campbell, et al No. 12 C.B.Stewart, Admr, of Carl Stewart vs ( Continued by consent Miller Mfg. Co. under former order No. 14 J.K.Morrison Gro. & Pro. Co. Continued for defendant vs Florida Citrus Exchange unaccount of sickness of Atty No, 15 Statesville Lumber Co. Continued by consent vs R.L.Church, et al No, 16 Statesville Lumber Co. bi Continued by consent Epps Harris, et al No, 20 oN rrinting Co, Continued for laintiff hie ) unaccount of sickness of a.P, Attorney Monday, May. 28th, , 1923. No, 22 S$ r411 Lumber Co, et al aie vs Continued by consent E.S.Goodin, et al No, 23 Sterling Mills, Inc. git : Continued Saginaw Milling Co. No. 28 S,E.Lyons vs Continued for Plaintiff L.A.“ayhew, Admx, of S.C.Lyons No, 32 W.M, Drum vs Continued by consent for Hutton & Bourbonnais Co, defendant No, 50 Florence B, lkamsey vs Continued for plaintiff James M, Ramsey No, 84 W, Copeland vs Continued for defendant Mary R, Copeland No, 87 E.E,Shaver, et al vs Continued W.eR.Mills and J.P.Mills No. 52 L.P,Claywell vs Continued for defendant Smith Hallman No, Sl Mrs, William Wallace vs Continued American “ailway Express Co, No, 45 Maggie Hartley vs C Hilliard Hartley ontinued No, 79 A.L, Pearson vs ict tesnen Continued for Rnhatere 7 This Honorable Court adjourns until Wednesday morning, May 29th., 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, PS uage Tuesday, May 29th., 1923, This Honorable Court convened Tueaday morning, May 29th., 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, After the convening of Court, the Iredell County Bar met in session and elected His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding and Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District of North Carolina, Chairman of said meeting and unanimously adopted the following resolution giving expession to their appreciation of the long and useful services of Hon, Platt D, Walker, Associate Justice of the State of North Carolina, whose hand brain ceased their labors on Mey 25rd., 1925. After the resolution was read and adopted, the several members of the Bar made appropriate speeches in Honor end memory of Justice “alker, "We, the members of the “ar of Iredell County, do hereby give expession to our appreciation of the long and useful services of Hon, Platt D. “alker, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, whose hand and brain ceased their labors on May 23rd., 19235, He was a profound lawyer, a great and just. Judge, whose opinions were exhaustive, carefully prepared, and commanded the respects of the Courts of our country. “e was true in all the various relations of life and enjoyed the confidence of his fellowmwn and his associates on and off of the bench. He was loved, honored and fespected by all of the people, His death is &@ loss to the profession, to the bench which he adorned for so many years, and to his State which he loved and served, Therefore, be it resolved by the Bar of Iredell County: That the féregoing be ordered spread upon the minutes of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to stand as a perpetual expression of our high regard for Justice Welker, end the sorrows that his death brings to each member of the Bar. (Signed) W,.D.Turner, Chairman $Signea) Dorman Thompson, Secretary." "Te resolution offered by the Bar of Statesville in memorial of Justice Platt D, Walker, having been unanimously adopted, it is ordered by the Court that a memorial page be set apart on the minutes of this Court, and that the same be spread upon the minutes," Tuesday, Ney 29th., 1923, "Tt is also ordered that a copy of these resolutions be sent to the Supreme Court ard that a copy also be furnished the local papers of the city, The Landmark and the Sentinel, the Charlotte Observer, Charlotte Daily Observer, Charlotte Evening News and The Raleigh News & Observer, Also that a copy be sent to the widow of the deceased, B,. F,. Lohe udge es ng. No, 32 State Judgment heretofore rendered on Sci Fa in vs this case is striken out, Motion by the State Joe Tate for judgment. Motion continued for defendants surety until August Term, 1925, of the Superior Court of Iredell County to give defendant's surety opportunity to surrender his principal, No, 49 North Caroline, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | lay Term, 1923, Mrs, Eula C, Wilson, Administratrix of H.C.Wilson vs JUDGMENT Southern Kailway Company. It appearing in this case that the plaintiff and the defendant have fully compromised and settled the matter at issue, and that the same has been fully complied with, It is ordered, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing because of her said writ, and that the defendant pay the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, B. F, Long Judge Presiding BY CONSENT; RT, Weatherman and Grier & Grier Attorneys for Plamtirr L.C,Caldwell Attorney for defendant Tuesday, May 29th., 1925, No, 354 ai ; North Carolina, In the Superior Court, t Iredell County. | May Term, 1923, i ork Nen ¥ JUDGMENT vs cyrus Wooten | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court, and the plaintiff, Nan York fails to appear to prosecute her cause. It is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff, Nan York be and she is hereby non-suited, It is further ordered by the Court that the plaintiff, Nen York be taxed with the cost of this action, B.F. Long Juage Presiding, SP SP SPST Se, wn NNN mo- 27 Henkel Craig Livestock Co., vs M. W. Tolbert, T. C. Funderburk ISSUE T. W. Tolbert. ( Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint, and if so in what amount? Yes. $306.26 plus interest. me 2 7 North Carolins, Iredell County Superior Court May Term, 1922, Henkel Craig Livestock Company ve Me. W. Talbert, &. C. Funderburk and 7+ V. Talbert JUDGMENT. j This cause coming on for hearing at this term of the court before His Honor B. F. Long, Judge, and jury and the jury for their verdict having answered the issue submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff Henkel Craig Livestock Company recover of the defen- dents M. W. Talber principal, and T. C. Funderburk and T. V. fealbert, sureties the sum of Three Hundred six and 26/100 dollars, with interest on the principal to wit: $276.94 from Sept. let, 1922, until paid, and the cost of the action to be taxed by the clerk of this court against said defendants. B. F. Lo Faize Presiding. kk kk a ok a 26 2 ga ic a ic ake ic ea a a a a ak is a ae a a Quesday, May 29th, 1923. No. 35 Roscoe Ellsworth j vs ( JUDGMENT OF NON - SUIT Lissie Ellsworth j Plaintiff feiling to appear and prosecute his action in this case, it is ordered and adjudged that plaintiff is hereby none suited and judgment rendered ageinst him for costs to be tazed by the clerk. B. F. Lo Macs tresltlag. 2 2 2 a a i aie ae a ae ac is ik a ae ie a a a Nr 34 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term, 1928. Freeze and Sherrill vs JUDGMENT. A. B. Parker This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, and it ap- pearing to the court that the parties have settled their differ- ences and compromised this action: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged the plaintiffs recover nothing by this action, and that each party pay their own witness and the plaintiffs and defendants each pay one-half of the court costs. B, F. Long Judge presiding. FM KC OR OK fe OR abe age ak aie ai a a a mS North Caroline, Superior Court Iredell County May Term, 1923. Bohn Long, Pleintiff, j Josie conn. Defendant. oo Pirst - Did the plaintiff and the defendant marry as alleged in the complaint? Answer Yes Second - Have the plaintiff and the defendant lived separate and apart for more than five successive years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer Yes. Third - Has the pleintiif been a resident of the Stute of North Carolina for more than five years next preceding the bringing of this action? Answer Yes. My 3K North Carolina, Superior Court Iredell County May Term, 1923. John Long, Plaintiff, i vs i JUDGM af. JoXsie Long, Defendant ‘ ' . This action coming on to be heard before His Honor, B. F. Long, and the Jury having found the issues in the case in favor of the pleintif?: It is therefore, considered and adjudged that the bonds of mat- rimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved. Tuesday, May 29th,1923 It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the cost of the action. B. F, Lon ' Bigs TresTeis- ERKEE EEK SKE EE Ke EEE EK KE He me ¥ North Carolinas, Superior Court Iredell County May term, 1923. John Templeton, plaintiff, Lillian Senpisten, defendant. 7 Piret - Did the plaintiff and the defemiant marry as alk ged in the complaint? Answer yes. Second - Have the plaintiff and the defendant live separate and apart from each other for more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer. Yes. Third - Has the plaintiff been a resident of the Stute of Norta Carclina for more than five years next preceding the com- mencement of this action? Answer. Yes. a“ me $5 North Carolina, Superior Court Iredell County May Term, 1923 John Templeton, plaintiff, : vs JUDGMENT. Lillien Templeton, defendant. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor B. F. Long, Judge and @ Jury and being heard upon the whole record and the issues submitted and the jury having found the issues in favor of the plaintiff: It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court, that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the de- fendant be and the same are hereby dissolved. It is further ad- . judged that the plaintiff pay all the cost. B. F. Lo @e esiding. aie RE as ee a a a a a CA By HSER AE RES FE ERE Tuesday, May 29th,1923 we 4 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County Leroy Johnson yy: vs | ISSUES Rebecca Johnson q'' Were the plaintiff and defendant married as @lleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. Has the defendant been a resident of N. C. for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action? 4ns. Yes. Have the pleintiff and defeniant lived separute and apart for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action? Ans. Yes. Mr- (04 North Caroling, In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term 1923 Leroy Johnston, ) vs kde JUDGMENT. Rebecca Johnston o. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Iredell Superior Court before His Honor B. F. Long, Judge presiding, and the jury and the following issues having been submitted to the jury and answered as follows: Were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the complaint. 4ns. Yes. Has the defendant been a resident of N. C. for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action? Ans. Yes. Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for more than five years prior to the beginning of this action? Ans. Yes. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Leroy Johnston and the defendant Rebecca Johnston be, and the same are hereby dissolved and the plaintiff, Leroy Johnston is hereby granted an absolute divorce from Rebecoa Johnson. It is further ordered that the plaintiff, Leroy Johnston, be taxed with the cost of this action by the clerk of this court. B. F. Long dudge tresiding. RB OR OR OK OR EF Me A he he ee hs a a oo a | +. Tuesday, May 29th,1923 a In the Superior Court Iredell County. ®. Le Tomlin, ve Mevchante Balik & Trust Co., Executor of W. Frank Snipes ) pir ee ee. ) This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court, and being heard, before His Honor B. F. Long, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff comes into open court and stutes that he is unable to make out his case against the de- fendant, and consents for judgment to be entered against him: It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the pleintiff take nothing by reeson of his writ, and that defendant go hereof without day. It is further considered and adjudged that plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. This 30th day of May, 1925. B. F,. Long Judge Presiding. fee a a a Ok a a a i a a Ak ae 26 i 2h a i ie a a a ca 2k a ae a North Caroline, } In the Superior Court Iredell County. First Netional Bank, vs American Trust Company JUDGMENT OF NON SUIT. of Charlotte, N. C. In the above entitled action plaintiff comes into Court and through its attorneys, Grier & Grier, taxes & voluntary non suit: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court, that the plaintiff's cause of action be, and the same is, hereby non- suited. Plaintiff to pay the cost of action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. This 30th day of May, 1928. 434 resting. udge es &eo He EE ee eae as ea a a Yor 5] North Oardlina In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term, 192% J. L. Bradford, ys vs J. W. auten,Admr. of JUDGMENT. Mrs. J.C. Bradford This cause coming on to be heard and it eppeering to the Tuesday, Mey 29th,1923 court that the matters and things in controversy have been compro~ mised by defendant paying pleintiff $25.00, plaintiff to pay court costs, each to pay his own witness fee. It is therefore considered and adjudged that pleintiff recover the sum of $26.00 and pay court costs, his own witness fees and defendant to pay his witness fees. SE ge esiding,. EE Oe 9 Ae RRM FORO ROR ORO ROK We 0G North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County A. B. Lineberger, Doing Business as the Lineberger Paint Company vs R. R. Hartsell Tnis cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Sup- erior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing from the verified complaint fiked in this cause, that B. E. Hartsell, wife of K.R. Hartsell, is @ necessary party to this action for the full determin- ation of the rights of all parties: It is therefore, ordered that a summons be issued requiring the said B. E. Hartsell, wife of R.R. Hartsell, to appear and answer the complaint filed in this matter. Witness my hand, this the 17th day of February, 1923. J. «a. Hartness Clerk Superior Court Nw at North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County May term, 1923. A. B. Lineberger, Trading and Doing Business ss Lineberger Paint Company R.R. Hartsell and wife, ) ) ( vs ) B. E. Hartsell ! In what amount, if any, is the defendant, R.R. Hartsell, indebted to the plaintiff? Ans. $392.35 with interest from Dec. lst, 1922. / Tuesday, May 29th,1923 North Carclina, In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term, 1923, 4. B. Lineberger, Trading and doing business as Lineberger Paint Co. a ¥ JUDGMENT. RR. Hartsell and wife, 3B. E. Hartsell This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1923, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge presiding, and a jury, upon the issue of the indebt- edness of the defendant, R.R. Hartsell, to the plaintiff and the jury having answered said issue as follows: "In what amount, if any, is the defendant, K.k. Hartsell, indebted to the pleintiff? Answer. $392.35 with interest from Dec. ist, 1922 until paid”. And it appearing to the Court that judgment by default and inquiry was rendered by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 23rd day of April, 1923, for want of an answer on the part of either of the defendants, and it appearing that it was adjudged by the Court in seid judgment that the con- veyance by R. R. Hartsell to his wife, B. E. Hartsell, of the real estate located near the city of Statesville on the Charlotte Road and described and defined as follows: Lots Number 29 and 30 in Block B of what is known as the Sowers property near States- ville, ninisenins plot of the same made by C. C. Bobb, surveyor for Boyd, Elliott and Buchanan Co., which map is recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County in Book 65, page 516 , was made without consideration and while the defendant R-R. Hartsell, was indebted to the pleintiff end other parties and that same was made for the purpose and intent to hinder, delay und defraud the creditors of the defendant, and it appearing to the Court further that it was adjudged in seid judgment thet said conveyance is void and that said deed was ordered to be delivered up to this Court and cancelled. It is therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, R. k. Hartsell, the sum of $302.36, together with interest on said sum from the lst day of December, 1922, until paid and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this court. It is further considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the conveyance referred to above, made by R-R. Herteell to his wife, B. B. Hertsell, 4s Tuesday, May 29th,1923 void, and said deed is hereby ordered to be delivered up to this Court and cancelled and the Clerk of this Court is ordered and directed to enter upon the records of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County a record of tuis judgment. B.¥, Long udge esiding. 6 ROR a a ae Wr Wh North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Tredell County.) Before the Clerk, A.B.Lineberger, Trading and doing business as, Lineberger Paint Company VSe JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUIRY R.R Hertsell and wife, B.E. Hartsell This cause coming on to be heard before J,A, ertness, Clark of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Cowrt that summons in this action was originally issued against, R.R.Hartsell, on the 7th day of February, 1923, and served on the said R.R,Hertsell, on the 10th day of February, 1923, the return date of said summons being the 17th day of February, 1925, and it appearing further that the complaint in said action was filed on the 17th day of February, 1925, in which complaint it was set out that immediately prior to the institution of this action, the defendant conveyed to his wife, B.E. Hartsell, his real estate located near the city of Statesville and described in said complaint, and it appearing further that it was alleged in said complaint that B,E,Hartsell, wife of R.R,Hartsell, paid nothing for said real estate, that said conveyance was made without consideration and while the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff and other parties and that the same was done with the purpose and intent to hinder, delay defraud the creditors of the defendant, and more particularly to prevent the collection by the plaintiff of the amount due him by the defendant, RR fertsell, and it appearing that the complaint alleged that at the time of issuing of the summons, the plaintiff was not aware that the defendant had made said conveyance and it appearing that said complaint was duly verified and asked that B.E.“artsell, wife of R.R,Hartsell, be made a party to this action and that summons be issued against her, 48 provided by law, and that it be found by the Court that the conveyance by the said R.R,Hartsell of the land described in the complaint was made Tuesday, May 29th., 1925, without consideration and with the purpose and intent to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of the said R,R,Hartsell and that said deed be declared null and void, and it appearing further to the Court that on soid 17th day of February, 1923, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County signed an order, directing that B.E.Hartsell be made a party to this action and that a summons be issued, requiring her to appear and answer the complaint filed in this action, and it further appearing that on said 17th day of February, 1923, a summons was issued against the said B.E.Hartsell, the return date of said summons being the 28th day of February, 1925, and 4t appearing further that said summons was served on the said B,i,Hartsell on the 22nd day of February, 1925, and it further appearing that no answer has been filed by either defendant in this action, Tt is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment by default is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants on all issued raised by the complaint filed in this action, except as to the amount due to the plaintiff by the defendant, R.R,Hartsell/ It is adjudged further by the Court that the conveyance by the said R,R,Hartsell to his wife, B. E, Hartsell, of the real estate located in the City of Statesville on the Charlotte road and described and defined as follows: Lots 29 and 30 in Block B. of what is mown as the Sowers property near Statesville, according to the plot of the same made by C.C,Bobb, surveyor for Boyd, Elliott, Buchanan Coe, which map is recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County in Book 65, page 516, was made without considera- tion, while defendant, R.R,Hartsell, was indebted to the plaintiff and other parties and that same was made for the purpose and intent to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of the defendant, It is adjudged further by the Court that said conveyance is void and that said deed be delivered up to this Court and that the same be canceled and that the Clerk of this Court shall enter upon the records of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County a record of this judgment, It is adjudged further by the Court that this action be transferred to the Civil Issue Docket for trial at term time and that the issue as to the amount due the plaintiff by the defendant, R.R,Hartsell, shall be submitted to a jury for its determination, Witness my hand, this the 23rd day of April, 1925, J, A, Hartness ° Clork Superior court. 1903 This Honorable Court adjourns until Thursday morning, Mey 30th » 8b 9:30 o'clock, A.M, ’ pee eS Ao Se Wednesday, May 30th., 1925, This Honorable Court convened Wednesday morning at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., on the 30th day of May, 1925, for the dispatch of business, Woe vs H. Dewitt Mills and Hugh liills ae No, 51 lary E.Lisk, Adm, of E,D.Lisk vs Tomm of Mooresville No, 55 Dorman Thompson as Receiver of Statesville Wood Products Co, oO SG 0. 56 The B,F,Goodrich Rubber Yo, VS Flake Holland No. 60 Jas.C,Davis, Director Veneral of J.K&.Morrison Gro, & Pro. Co, *T ge NO» 61 Yvames i, Brow VS H. C. Hunter YT ° NiOe ke U.S, tdwards, vs E.M. Yount No, 78 John TE, Hunt & Co, vs James “atts, et al No. 79 A. L. Pearson vs “abel Pearson 46 , Annie Beaver, Admx, of Luther “eaver Continued for defendant Continued Continued for defendant Continued Continued Continued Continued Remanded back to Clerk of the Superior Court in whose juisdiction it is. Continued for plaintiff It is ordered by the Court that all cases heretofore disposed of and continued are continued to August Term, 1923 This Honorable Court adjourns until Thursday morning, May S1lst., 1925, at 9:30 6'clock, A.M, Judge Presiding. Thursdayy. May SOth,, 19235, This Honorable Court convened Thursday morning, May Slst., 1923, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business, No, 19 State vs Jemes A, Russell 2 Nog. 22, 34 State vs re Ethel “allace North Carolina, Iredell County. To Hon, 1923, of Iredell We, the IE ce A I ee oa LO } ‘ ‘ ) 4 ) ; : ‘ | ABORTION, It appearing to tne Court that the defendant James A, Russell was tried and convicted of aiding in an abortion at November Term, 1922, and that said defendant appealed to the Supreme Court and that the Supreme Court found no error in said trial and that the defendant is now in the custody of the High Sheriff of Iredell County, therefore, It is ordered by the Court that the said Tames A, Russell be sent to the State's Prison under the former order of TWO YEARS, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON IN THREE COUNTS « It appearing to the Court that the defendant Ethel Wallace has paid into Court $123.30 cost of all three of these actions, also ‘{j125,90 Hospital bill of Victor Morrison and $201.70 on the account of injuries and lost of time of the said Victor Morrison, It is therefore ordered by the Court that the judgment heretofore made in these three cases be striken out and the further judgment of the Court is that judgment be suspended on condition that the defendant be of good behavior for one year, B. F, Long, Judge Presiding and holding May ‘erm, superior Courts; Grand Jury beg leave to submit our report as follows: We acted upon all bills sent before our body by the Solicitor and made due return of the same to the Court, We visited the various offices in the Court House by committee and found all the offices in good condition. We visited the county Jail by committee and found one White male prisoner and three colored male prisoners, ‘The prisoners report they were well cared for and had plenty to eat and could not ask for better treatment that they were receiving, We found the jail in Sanitary condition, We recommend that the walls in the cells at the jail be repaired, and also recommend that the bottom iron rail around the cells be repaired to prevent the same from rust, where it Comes in contact with the damp floor, Thursday, May Slst., 1925. We also visited the county Home by committee and found seven white male inmates, Seventeen white female inmates, Nine colored male inmates and Five colored female inmates, all of whom were very high in their praise of the management and the treatment which they were receiving at this institution, and that they were well cared for in every particular, We found further that the Home was sanitary and well provided for in every particular and that screens has been provided for all windows and doors. The crops looked very prosperous and the farm was in fine condition, There is now growing Seventy acres in small grain on the farm, Twenty-five acres in corn, Sixty in Clover and Ten in Truck, We visited the Chain Gang by committee and found Six white men and Seventeen colored men who report that they were receiving satisfactory care and treatment, and we found the prisoners well supplied with sufficient wholesome food and also furnished with sanitary and comfortable living quarters, It was found by the committee that the prisoners at the camp go to work at Seven in the morning and stop One hour for Lunch at noon and quit work at Six in the afternoon, Upon investigation we found that the stable for the chain gang horses was placed at a distance of about 100 yards from where the prisoners are housed and fed, in order to prevent the annoyance of flies so far as possible, We found that the prisoners daily minu consisted of the following; Breakfast, bacon, molasses, butter, coffee and wheat bread, Dinner and Supper, two vegatables, milk, corn bread and boiled meat. We discover that the Solicitor had gotten up a ménu for the convicts which we endorse, We beg to further report that in obedience to the instructions from the Court, we made investigation of school buildings in the city of Statesville and of Troutmans, And also received a report from Prof. J. A. Steele, County Superintendent of Schools for Iredell County with reference to the conditions of other school: buildings in the county, and from our investigations, we find that the New High School building at Scotts, Harmony and Sharon and Cool Springs are not provided with outeside fire escapes, but are built under the plans approved by the State Board of Education and in these buildings are ample opportunity of escape in case of emergency, The High School at Troutmans has an auditorium on the second flger and has only one exit through a five foot door and dow a winding wooden stair-way to the out-let on the ground floor, We recommend that the budlding Thursday, May 3lst., 1923. be completed according to plans and specifications before opens again. Ye recommend that fire escapes be provided in the North Sehool and colored School in Mooresville, As to the school building in the city of Statesville, we find that while the buolding do not have out-side fire escapes on the wa&l, we do find that the building have ample openings through ones doors, opening on the out-side, sufficient to permit all occupants of the building to escape through these various doors in case of emergency. This the 23rd day of May, 1923, Respectfully submitted, L.C, Steele Foreman Grand Jury. In its instructions to the Grand Jury the Court, agreeably to its custom in this regard instructed the Grand jury to examine the records of the Clerk's Office to ascertain if any guardians of minor children had failed to make a settlement of their accounts with the Clerk of the Superior Court within twelve months, as required by the Statute, To this end the Court ordered the Clerk to make ¢ of said defaulting guardians to the Grand Jury to the end tha the names of said defaulting guardians may be recorded on the minutes of said Court, and such further action taken with regard thereto as may be necessary, The Clerk informing the Court that it would require some time to do this, the Clerk is allowed until the August Criminal Term of this Court, at which time to file the list of the said defaulting guardians, This order to be spread on the minutes of the Court. a EN OE Thursday, May Slst., 1925. We also visited the county Home by committee and found seven white male inmates, Seventeen white female inmates, Nine colored male inmates and Five colored female inmates, all of whom were very high in their praise of the management and the treatment which they were receiving at this institution, and that they were well cared for in every particular, We found further that the Home was sanitary and well provided for in every particular and that screens has been provided for all windows and doors. The crops looked very prosperous and the farm was in fine condition, There is now growing Seventy acres in small grain on the farm, Twenty-five acres in corn, Sixty in Clover and Ten in Truck, We visited the Chain Gang by committee and found Six white men and Seventeen colored men who report that they were receiving satisfactory care and treatment, and we found the prisoners well supplied with sufficient wholesome food and also furnished with sanitary and comfortable living quarters, It was found by the committee that the prisoners at the camp go to work at Seven in the morning and stop One hour for Lunch at noon and quit work at Six in the afternoon, Upon investigation we found that the stable for the chain gang horses was placed at a distance of about 100 yards from where the prisoners are housed and fed, in order to prevent the annoyance of flies so far as possible. We found that the prisoners daily minu consisted of the following; Breakfast, bacon, molasses, butter, coffee and wheat bread, Dinner and Supper, two vegatables, milk, corn bread and boiled meat. We discover that the Solicitor had gotten up a ménu for the convicts which we endorse, We beg to further report that in obedience to the instructions from the Court, we made investigation of school buildings in the city of Statesville and of Troutmans. And also received a report from Prof, J. A. Stele, County Superintendent of Schools for Iredel} County with reference to the conditions of other school:buildings in the county, and from our investigations, we find that the New High School building at Scotts, Harmony and Snaron and Cool Springs are not provided with out-side fire escapes, but are built under the plans approved by the State Board of Education ana in these buildings are ample opportunity of escape in case of emergency, The High School at Troutmans has an auditorium on the second flger and has only one exit through a five foot door and dom a winding wooden stair-way to the out-let on the ground floor, We recommend that the bud@lding Thursday, May 3lst., 1923. be completed according to plans and specifications before opens again, We recommend that fire escapes be provided in the North School and colored School in Mooresville. As to the school building in the city of Statesville, we find that while the buolding do not have out-side fire escapes on the wa&l, we do find that the building have ample openings through a doors, opening on the out-side, sufficient to permit all occupants of the building to escape through these various doors in case of emergency. This the 23rd day of May, 1923, Respectfully submitted, L.C, Steele Foreman Grand Jury. In its instructions to the Grand Jury the Court, agreeably to its custom in this regard instructed the Grand jury to examine the records of the Clerk's Office to ascertain if any guardians of minor children had failed to make a settlement of their accounts with the Clerk of the Superior Court within twelve months, as required by the Statute, To this end the Court ordered the Clerk to make a List of said defaulting guardians to the Grand Jury to the end that the names of said defaulting guardians may be recorded on the minutes of said Court, and such further action taken with regard thereto as may be necessary, The Clerk informing the Court that it would require some time to do this, the Clerk is allowed until the August Criminal Term of this Court, at which time to file the list of the said defaulting guardians, This order to be spread on the minutes of the Court. In the Superior Court, May Term, 1923. Nort, Carolina,| In the Superior Vourt, Tredell County. ! May Term, 1923, Carrie VW, Miller vs t FIWAL JUDGMENT G. P, Scott j Tis cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1925 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before Hon. B.F,Long, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the defendant in this action appealed to the Supreme Court of North Carolina from the originel judgment rendered herein by Resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District, and that upon a final termination of the appeal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina that the judgment of the Superior Court heretofore rendered , was affirmed at the Spring Term of the Supreme Court and a certificate to that effect filed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County; It is therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the former judgment of the Superior Court of Iredell County be, and the same hereby affirmed, in accordance with the certificate of said Supreme Court, And it is ordered by the Court that the defendant accept the deed tendered by the plaintiff and pay the purchase money therefor and that the deed tendered by the plaintiff conveys a good estate in fee simple to the land therein described, And it further appesring that the defendant has paid all cost in the Supreme Court adjudged against him, it is therefore ordered by the Court that the defendant pay the cost in the Superior Court to be taxed by the Clerk of seid Superior Court and that this judgment be duly enrolled in the office of the Superior Court of Iredell County. B. F, Long Judge Presiding. This Honorahle Court adjourns Sine Die, fh. A. Judge Prestding’15th Judicial District of North Carolina, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, JUNE..2nd,, 1925, Nort, Carolina, Tredell County. This release and entered into this the 2nd day of June, 1925, by Victor Morrison of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, WITNESSETH; That whereas one Ethel Wallace was indicted and submitted in open Court to the assault on Victor Morrison, Parthgnia Morrison, the wife of Victor Morrison, end Ernest “allace, and whereas the said Ethel Wallace has paid into open Court the sum of $326.70 to the use and benefit of Victor Morrison, e part of same to be used by the said Victor Morrison t > he pot due Long's sanitorium, said sum being $125.00: Now, therefore, I, Victor Morrison, do hereby forever release the said Ethel Wallace, from any and 1imsS or causes of action growing out of the above matter or in any way connected therewith, said matter growing out of the fact of the shooting of the Victor Morrison, I, the said Victor Morrisc arree not to bring any action of any kind against th husband, Ernest Wallace, for any claim or growing out of the above alleged assaults ith of s Witness my hand and seal, this the 2nd day of June, Victor Morrison » (SEAL) WITNESS: J. W. Sharpe Deputy Clerk Superior Court. . a North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, Tredell County. | June 4th,, 1923 John E. Hurst & Co, vs UDG EER Ff James Watts and Nola Watts This cause coming on for hearing before the undersigned Clerk at his office in Statesville, this the First Monday in June, 1923, and it appearing to the Court that the summons was duly served and complaint filed March 1ith, 1923, and no answer filed thereto, and that the action is on Note under seal for sum certain and the complaint duly verified, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff have judgment against said defendants for want of an answer by default, And it is further considered, ordered and adjudged that & Co, recover of the defendants, James Watts and Nola Watts, the sum of Fourteen Hundred Thirty-six and 11/100 Dollars with interest thereon from Sept. 1lst., 1922, until paid and cost of action to be taxed by the Clerk, The the 4th day of June, 1923, J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County. SS Se Nort, Carolina, } Treders Coante’| In the Superior Court, before the Clerk, Monday, June 4th,, 1923, Clarence Biddings and Howard Houston Th, > ~ J 5 5 sai Trading and doing business under the firm name and style of Biddines and Houston. n . ngs and Houston Plaintiff ; VSe a A ee ry, defendant 4 QBobeiiy This Superior Court of trans oe on vo be heard before the Clerk of the Gel] County, upon the verified complaint of the Plaintiff and it appeari y } defendant, by copy of ng that due service has been made upon the : Summons and complain rf against Ses for the seers gene tat judgnent may be taken mn amount demanded, less the sum of #30,00, which 7. +4 a “Ayn is ices sates eee res considered and adjudged by the Court that ee ae c. cer ce ee sum of $315.00 and interest on of the action to be taxed by the Sisvk, °? = This’ the 4th dey of June, 1903 J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, North Carolina, | In The Superior Court, Iredell County.| Before the Clerk, June 18th,, 1923, Superior Yern Mills, Incorporated, JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT d Hut EPA AND INQUIRY { { VS. i { { Cherlotte Waste Company, Incorporated, This cause coming on to be heard before J.A,Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was issued on the llth day of May, 1923, and made returnable on the 25th day of May, 1925, and that same was served on the defendant on the 14th day of lias, 1923, and it appearing further that a verified complaint was filed in this action on the 24th day of May, 1923, wherein it was alleged that the defendant was due the plaintiff the sum of $1080.40, with interest thereon from Nov, 18th, 1920, until paid, subject to a credit of $200.00 paid on March, 24th, 1922, and it appearing further to the Court that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date of the summons and that no answer has been filed. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment by default is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant on all issues raised by the complaint filed in this action, except as to the amount due the plaintiff by the defendant, the Charlotte Waste Company. It is adjudged by the Court further that this action be transferred to the Civil Issue Docket for trial at term time and that the issue as to the amount due the plaintiff by the defendant be submitted to a jury for its determination. Witness my hand, this the 18th day of June, 1925, the same being the Third Monday in June, 1925, J.A,Hartness Clerk Superior court,- Iredell County. North Caroline,| In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | Before the Clerk, June 18th., 1925, 3.C,Holmes, trading and doing business as J,C,Holmes Lumber Company. JUDGMENT BY DEFAULTS ve FINAL p r.F,Yeavidson and J,A, Davidson { t I { This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hartnes, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that summons was duly issued in this cause on the 14th day of May, 1925, against the defendants and that said summons was made returnable on the 26th day of May, 1925, and that same was duly served upon the defendants and appearing further to the Court that a verified complaint was filed in this case on the 24th day of May, 1923, in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing further that the cause of action is to recover judgment on two promissory notes executed under seal by the defendant, R.F,Vavidson and endorsed by J,D,Davidson, said notes being set out in full in the complaint, and it appearing further that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date of said summons and that no answer has been filed by either of the defendants, It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, R.F.Davidson, as principal, and J,A,Davidson, as endorser, the sum of $1085.06, with interest on said amount from March ist, 1925, until paid and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. It is further ordered by the Court that execution issue first against R.F,Davidson, the principal debtor, and in she event that said judgment cannot be made by execution against rn. F.Yavidson, that then execution issue against J.A,Davidson, the endorser, Witness my hand, this the 18th day of June, 1923, the seme being the Third Monday in June, 1923 J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, Iredelj County. Nortn Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Monday, July 2nd., 1925, Henkel Craig Live Stock Company and T,S,.Coffey, Trustee WANT OF ANSWER, ' JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FOR vs. { { } L.C,Deadman and wife, C,B,Deadman This cause coming on for hearing before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on this the first Monday of July 1923, and it appearing that the summons was duly served on said defendants and the defendants have failed to answer the complaint, which was duly filed and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the time fixed by the summons. It is therefore considered that the plaintifs have judgment against said defendants by default for want of an answer as it appears that the cause of action 4s founded on a contract under seal for a sum certain and that the complaint was duly verified; It is therefore adjudged that the plaintiff Henkel Craig Live Stock Company recover of the defendants L.C.Deadman and wife, C.B.Deadman the sum of Five Hundred Forty-nine & 70/100 Dollars, with interest on $500,00 the principal from May 19th., 1925, until paid, and cost of the action, It is further adjudged that said judgment 4s a specific lien on lot No. 5, in block One of Oak View Addition to the City of Statesville, N.C., as mapped and platted by R.F.Rives which map is recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County, Book 38 page 500, to which map reference is hereby made, It is further adjudged the defendants equity in said lot of land, by reason of this default in the payment of the debt aforesaid, secured by a deed of trust, on said lot of land. Let executin issue for its sale as required by law, J. A. Hartness Clerk Super Lor Court of Iredell VJounty, N.C. p=": Li sf | ele lt | et | // A x In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, North Carolinas} Monday, July 2nd., 1925. Iredeli County.! Grace Dickinson, Plaintiff | VS. 1 JUDGMENT T, M, Manous, Defendant The plaintiff and the defendant coming barens the Court, the plaintiff through her Attorney John L. Davis and the defendant through his Attorney R. L. Brown, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have agreed upon terms of settlement of all matters of difference in this action whereby the plaintiff is to recover of the defendant the sum of Fifty Dollars in full and complete satisfaction any and a11 future claims which the plaintiff may have against the defendant by reason of any injuries sustained by the plaintiff while riding in the car of the defendant on or about the ninth day of April, 1923, and the defendant to pay cost of this action, It is therefore according ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff have and recover judgment against the defendant in the sun y Dollars together with the cost of this action in full satisfaction matters of controversy etc. as set out in the agreement herein appearing and further plaintiff take nothing. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superfor Court Iredell County. Entered by consent this the 2nd dey of July, 1925 John L. Davis Attorney for Plaintiff R. L. Brotm Attorney for Vetendant niS judgement has been paid in full and is hereby canceled, July 2nd, 1923, Grace Dickinson, Plaintiff By Jno, L. Davis Attorney. Nortn Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) Before the Clerk, Bank of Stony Point vs Marius Cooper, R,.A.Ccoper, Mergeret Brawley, Administratrix of the estate of R.V.Brawley, deceased Mis cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel, Comty, end being heard and it appearing to the Court that on the Sth day of June, 1925, the plaintiff procured a summons and caused the same to be issued against the above named defendants which said summons was made returnable on the 19th dayvy of June, 19235, and it further appearing to the Court that on the 8th day of June, 1923, that said summons was duly served on each of said defendants as required by law and that a verified copy of the complaint filed in the action was left with the defendants and each of them, at the time of service of the summons; and it further appearing that this 4s an action for the breach of an express contract to pay 4 sum of money absolutely fixed by said contract, to-wit: The same being for the recover of $2060.00, and the interest thereon from the 23rd day of Nov., 19223 due by note and it further appearing that on the 5th day of June, 1923, the plaintiff filed a verified complaint in this action and that that more than tventy days have elapsed since the return of said summons ahd the filing by the plaintiff of the verified complaint, as aforesaid, the defendants have failed to appear and amswer or demur to the complaint; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants are now due and owing to the plaintiff the sum of $2060.00, with interest thereon fron 23rd day of Nov., 1922, It is therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $2060.00, with interest thereon from 23rd day of Iov., 1922, until paid together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Court, This the 16th day of July, 1923. J,A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. Nortn Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County.| Before the Clerk, Sterling Mills, Incorporated vs JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT, FINAL. I. W. Cooper, Trading and doing siness as, I. W, Cooper Company j { { : ' ! This cause coming on to be heard before J,A,Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court thet summons in this action was issued. on the 24th day of Apral, 1923, ana that seme was returnable on the 12th day of May, 1923, and that was served on the defendant on April 25th,, 1923, and it thet a verified complaint was filed on the 14th appearing that on the 4th day of June, 1925, * the Superior Céurt, signed an order, giving r 2nd within which to file an answer, and it * has ever been filed and it appearing to the va) ause of action is to recover the amount due 4 e aut §n ents hez set out in said complaint, one for $5000,00 ore, ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court iff recover of the def _ } dh } f cover of the defendant the sum of $5485.25, together ‘est thereon at t he rn » wt ac t the rate of 6% per annum, from the 23rd day and for th ate 4 wl r the costs of this action to be taxed ar . ne or lacr nt » oc he cord day of July, 1925, J. A, *artness nT Clerk Superior Court Iredell County. MONDAY, SULY SOth., 1925. North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County.! August Term, 1923. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and county aforesaid, on the 5th Monday before the lst Monday in September, 1925, the same being the 30th day of July, A.D. 1925, when and where His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge in the 15th Judicial District of North Carolina, : presiding,/is present and presiding, and the Hon, Zeb. V. Long, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M. P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serv@ 4s jurors for the first week of this Term, to-wit: The following were drawn as Grand jurors for the Term: J.F.Fairchild, C.0.Rogers, J.G.Bibson, H.L.Kincaid, Walter L. Brown, J.L.Reid,(of Cool Springs Township) J.R,Allison, W.L.Keller, H.C.Elam, J.R.Winecoff, J.0-Bost, W. Press Sharpe, J.D,Lackey, TeA. Ostwalt, J.V.Wooten, D.D,Little, B.A.Baggarly, and Ed,R,Siceloff, 3. F. Fairchild was appointed and sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. 0.B, Lazenby was sworn as officer in charge of the Grand jury. S.G.Caudill and W.M.Freeze were excused by the Court for the term. J.F.Jones was reportef as beitg unable to attend . court and sent in a Doctors certificate certifying to his illness, J.J.Levan was reportrd as being dead, The following werd sworn to serve 4s pettit jurors for week, to-wit: J.S.Waugh, H.A.Parnard, W.T.Keller, A.M.Turner, D.S, Thomas, John R. Morrison, A.J.Beaver, B.W,Mershall, 0.J.Sherrill, B.A.Baggarly, W.E.Massey, B.L.Sherrill, J.H.Bass, JA. rey. No, 1 State STORE“BREAKING, LARCENY & RECEIVING vs Nol Prosed With Leave Block Dalton No, 2 State | MANUFACTURING LIQUOR i) ' Nol Prosed With Leave Leonard Renegar No, 3 State HAVING LIQUOR FOR SALE VS - Nol Prosed With Leave Cal Brow No, 4 State vs Roscoe Holman No. 5 State vs Will H. Souther No, 6 State vs Ralph Rogers No, 7 State vs David Honeycutt No. 8 State gvs aither Hayes No. 9 State vs Thomas Stewart No. 10 State vs Ivey Killian Patty Sisk Vernon Eads Jessie Smith Grudger Barnes Ralph Hefner No. 11 State vs John Sells No, 12 State vs 0.C,. Allred No. 16 State va: Joe fate No. i” State ve Fred Johnson MONDAY, JULY 30th,, 1923. ~~ PR RAT TORI eT A a I SEIS ee HAVING LIQUOR FOR SALE, Nol Prosed With Leave RETAILING LIQUOR Nol Prosed With Leave, STOREBREAKING, LARCENY & RECEIVING, UNDER BOND TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued to Nov, Term, 1925, under former order, STORE-BREAKING, LARCENY & RECEIVING, AND UNDER BOND TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued to Nov, Term, 1925, under former order, HAVING AN UNLAWFUL AMOUNT OF LIQUOR, Continued under former order to November Term, 1925, RESISTING AN OFFICER, Alias Capias, TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued under former order to Nov, 1923, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Nol Prosed With Leave PERJURY Alias Capias, BIGAMY Alias Capias, LARCENY & RECEIVING, The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel waives the finding ef a a end enters a plea of guilty of Forcible prereees, which plea is accepted by the Solicitor ade e State. It is ordered and adjudged by e Court that on motion of the Solicitor that prayer for judgment be conbimied for two years on payment of the cost and further that def © of good behavior for said’ period and abide the further orders of the Court. No. 25 State vs Alfred Jones No, 19 State vs Richard Johes John Conner No, 235 State vs WeF.Norris No, 25 State vs Alfred Jones No, 27 State vs W. F. Norris CR IM PR ee pa EI EE SN pS EN eS MONDAY, JULY s0th., 1923. NON-}SUPPORT Defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel waives the finding of @ bill and enters a plea of guilty of Non-support as charged in the warrant, which plea is accepted by the Solicitor for the State. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspened uopn payment of the cost as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, (This order is striken out, see order a (for disposition of this case) LARCENY & RECEIVING, Defendants enter a plea of not guilty. Jury No. 1 after being duly sworn and ' empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendants not guilty of the charge in the bill of indictment, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Not a true bill NON-}-SUPPORT Defendant by his counsel waives bill and Pleads guilty of the non-sup ort of his wife and child, e Solicitor stating to the Court that he has made a personal investigation of the matter moves that the judgment shall be suspended upon condition that the defendant pay all the costs and be of good behavior and support his wife and child, The Court upon this recommendation suspends judgment upon the condition that the defendant pay all the costs and that he support his wife and child and show he has done so to the Court at each eriminal term for twelve months, and that if he fails to do so a judgment shall be entered against him in this case, He is recognized in bond in the sum of $200, to this Court for twelve months, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, The defendant by his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of carrying concealed weapon, The Court efter investigating this matter strikes out the plea of guilty and directs a verdict of not guilty, and discharges the defendant so far as the charge of carrying a weapon’¢dncealed about his person is concerned, Noy 24 State vs Herman H, Pierce NE RE Et ETO AN os et ore CY eaten pe eS oO ~~ No, 14 State vs Nel1 Overcash ¥ No, 15 State vs X Nell Overcash — — { 4 | I j : { | j } j { i { i { i } I { | f : i { i { { No, 17 State vs Nell Overcash This Honorable Court 1925, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, " MONDAY, July S0th., 1925. Non-Support : The defendant by counsel waives bill and pleads guiity Upon motion of the Solicitor the judgment is suspended ’ on these conditions: FIRST, that the défendant shal} pay all the costs in this case, SECOND, that he shall e of good behavior, THIRD, and especially that he shall maintein and adequately support his wife, other. wise judgment is to be pronounced against him at any time in the discretion of the Court, either upon motion of the wife or of the Solicitor at any time within two years, Also’ that he shall enter tnto a bond in the sum of $100, to show at each criminal term for twelve months that he has supported his wife and been of good behavior, RETAILING LIQUOR, The defendant through his counsl Hayden Clement enters a plea of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment, The sentence of the Court is that the defendant be imprisoned in the county jail for twelve months, and he is assigned to work on the public roads of Iredell County. This sentence is to bake effect agreeably to and in accordance with the order of the Court made in No, 15 on the. docket at this term, and shall‘be effective according to an order made in No, 15, It is suspended until made effective by the order in No, 15, RETAILING LIQUOR, The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel Hayden Clement enters a plea of guilty as charged in the bill of indictment, It appearing to the Court that the defendant is a youth of 17 and that recently he has been sentenced by the Recorders' Court of Mooresville to the roads for six months in this case and in No, 14, and brings this action before this Court by appeal, and it further appearing that he has removed his residence form Mooresville to North Iredell and is now 3B engaged in working for Mr, Perry Hardin Lazenby, and that he is reperted as being of good behavior since this indictment started, it is, therefore, considered and adjudged in this case that the judgment in this case is suspended upon condition, FIRST, that the defendant be of good behavior for two years and especially that he shall avoid violating the liquor law in any respect, SECOND, that he shall pay all'the costs in Nos. 14, 15 end 17 on this doeket, THIRD, also upon condition a he ae into a bond in the sum of $400, to ear at each and every criminal term of the ore” of Iredell County for twelve months to show at he has been of good behavior anf that he has not in any respect violated the law of the State; end also upon condition that he shall be ready to suiat®. to the Ams submit to a sentence in jail and weirre on the public roads of Iredell County for MONTHS, as set forth in No, 14, in the event the Court shall be satisfied that he has in any respect violated case No, 15, ed the terms of the order in this RETAILING LIQUOR, Motion for ju ent set forth dn uo. ie. ConSiEes Fae journs until Tuesday morning, July 3lste» TUESDAY, July Sist,, 1925, This Honorable Court convened Tuesday morning, July 31st., 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, for the dispatch of Business, No, 13 State vs Howard Houston No. 26 State vs Rufus Lavendar sel, L.C,faldwell teers 4 of Forcible Trespass, Which ordeyed and adju¥ged efendant h to cost to be Said donati ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON The defendant comes into open Court and enters a plea of guilty of assault with deadly weapon, which pléa is accepted by the Solicitor for the State, In this case the witness W.F.Nerris. was required to appeser here on the 3ist day of July, 1923, to testify as a witness against Rufus: Lavendar, who departed the Court without leave, and forfeited his attendance and caused delay in the trial of the Lavendar case and was fined and not arrested before this case against Lavender was heard, The Court ordered an Instanter Capias, and now orders a Alias Capias, and requires this man to gibe a bond in the sum of $200, for his appearance at the next criminal Gourt, otherwise to be committed to jail until the next criminal Court,: Upoy the call of this case 4t is reported to the Court by.word of mouth that the defendant was tried in the Recorders’ Court of Mooresville, and that a fine of $100, was imposec upon the defendant or a sentence of nine months on the roads, but this conditional judgment was not certified to the Court, and this Court does not know what the recor will show, It has no record from the other Court. What the Court now has before 4%, is a bill of indictment found by the Grand Jury at this term of Court, charging the defendant with an assault with deadly weapon upon the person of W.F.Norris,.v Upon the ¢glil-of the case the defendant, in the first instance, lead not guilty, but after conference with the Solicitoy pleads guilty, asking the Court to hear his explanation, which the Court ellowed, The Solicitor, with the Court's approval, notified W.F.Norris, the man alleged to have been assaulted, to be here at this hearing, and he departed the Court without leave, and the court has not heard what he has to say about this case, After hearing the case, and in view of all the circumstances,the judgment of this court is that he be imprisoned in the County jail, for a term of Three MONTHS, and the Court tves the County Commissioners leave to fim out, his hire to be applied to the payment — all costs in this action. TUESDAY, July Sist., 1925, No, 22 State ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ON FEMALE3 SAID vs DEFENDANT BEING OVER 18 YEARS OF AGE, - Frank Wilson The defendant enters a plea of not guilty, Jury No, 1 after being duly sworn for their verdict say they find the defendant not gu of the charge in which he stands mast (REPORT OF GRAND JUR FOR AUGUST TERM,’ 1920’) Report of the Grand Jury, August Term, 1925, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, Judge B.F.Long, Judge Presiding, We the Grand jurors for August Term of Iredell Superior C 1923, beg leave to submit the following report: perior Court, We have passed upon all'bills sent us by the Solicitor and made return of same to the Court, We visited th jail by Committee and found two white male plea pepe and one oe Tec We find the jail in a sanitary. cond on, ve recommen hat'a suitable cell be confinement of insane persons, en We have made the most search and thr possible under the circvmstances suaetits to a eae ee prisoners from Iredell County jail last night, July SOth. We are unable to find any reliable and sufficient evidence as to any parties who might have or did communicate tools to the prisoners to aid in their said escepe. However, we recommend to all officers'whose duty it is to continue a diligent investigation of this matter, We find from our investigation that the officials are appearently too careless as to the care and guard of the jail, and urge more promptness in this respect, and we further urge and earnestly recommend that the Gounty Commissioners see to it that every thing possible is done to keep down communication with the prisoners by out side persons, We visited the Chain Gang by Committee and fi i nd Twenty-four Breronrets eight white and Sixteen colored men, We also find Tnipteen es in good condition, We find the camp in very good condition, We recommend that night cloth p fee & ae poet pao a be provided for all prisoners whether We visited the County Home b , in a ate y committee and found Forty-one eee a tcaee of six white men, Twenty white women, Seven colored » Eight colored women; end Five prisoners working’ on the farm, We found the home in good sanit t ary condition, The Supt. 900 bushels of erain were harvested this year, The Bek ort on that they were well fed, comfortable clothed and treated kindly. We find Forty-three guardians wh o have within twelve months as provided by. the Statute, Re peskaniek aes the Solicitor be inst this matter. ructed to make immediate investigation of Respectfully submitted, 3X. F, Faircnila Froreman July Slst., 1923, LAST ORDER’ a f. . Vil ly o WEDNESDAY, JULY Slst., 1925. In the Superior Court, August Term, 1925, Jumge B. F, Long, Presiding ORDER: North Sarolina;| Tredell County.| The Grend Jury, before adjournment, make a written report, and in connection with their report they submit a list of Guardians who have not made settlement with their wards in the Clerk's‘ office, and within=twelve months, as requiged by the Statute, It is ordered by the Court: FIRST: That the report of the Grand Jury in full, including this list of delinquent guerdians in Iredell County, be spread upon the minutes of this Court, SECOND: That the Clerk make a copy of this report and the Sherif? Is ordered to deliver a copy thereof to the Board of County Conmissioners in their next open session for their consideration, THIRD: That with reference to the Forty-three (43) Guardians in Iredell County Whohave-violated the law in fakling to make annual settlement before the Clerk, it is ordered that the Clerk take steps immediately to bring these guardians before him to make settlement as required by the Statute, end if he fails to do so, the Solicitor will please take such action as may be necessary in assisting the’ Clerk in obtaining settlement from these defaulting guardians, FOURTH: The Grand Jury reporting that three prisoners escaped during this term of the Court, and the Court is informed that this was effected probably by the prisoners having appliances and means furnished them for their escape from the. outside, the court urges upon the keeper of the jail and upon the other officers connected with the care of prisoners a stricter vigilence with regard to the confinement of prisoners, and with regard to allowing anybody access to the prisoners in jail, unless said persons are accompanied by an officer, who is sure that such visitors have no weapons or appliances or anything to enable prisoners to escape from jeil. In the Superior Court, North Carolina, | August Term, 1925, Iredell VYounty. | No. 26 State i vs i JUDGMENT Rufus Lavendar § Upon a re-examination of this. case, the Court being in a as to whether, or not, there was an appeal lawfully taken by the defendant from the Recorders! Court of Mooresville (C.V. Voils, Recorder) the court caused the records of the said recorder to be certified to this court, by which the court is informed that in one case the defendant was fined $50, and 15,50 cost in the Recorders! Court for an assault upon W.F,Norris3¢in the second case for carrying 4 concealed weapon he was fined $50. and required to pay $15.00 cast; in another case judgment suspended upon the payment of cost, $15.50, for an assault on a person named W.F.Norris. In order that this Court may have ju sdiction the Solicitor waives the failure of the defendant to have brought his case lawfully to this Court by appeal» so that the Court now has before it the record in the Recorders Court and by the waiver of the Solicitor to the right to be heard in this Court, the Court, with this further information, strikes out the judgment rendered yeaterday, July 3lst., against the defendant and in lieu thereof now imposes the same sentence in this court in each of these cases as that imposed by the Recorder, with this modification, however, namely: AS the defendant has failed to pay the two fines of $100. and the costs in the Recorders’ Court and the costs in this Court, the judgment of the Court is that he be imprisoned in the County jail for a term of FOUR’ MONTHS with leave to the Board of County Commissioners in their discretion to hire him out for the purpose of paying the costs and fines in this Court and the costa in the Recorders' Court, but if he does not do so, then it is adjudged that the cefendant work on the public roads during his term for FOUR” MONTHS. ose om B’ F wh S hf Nortn Carolina;t Iredell County.4 TUESDAY, JULY Slst., 1925. In the Superior Court, August Term, 1925, I hereby submit the following list of Guardians who have not made settlement within Twelve months, as provided by the Statute, Guardian: Ikerd, Mary Je Brow, Sale Tolbert, Watt Hair, G. Hs Murdock, J.C.° Morrison, “rs, Bessie May Lowrance, D.L. Burton, Ashley Nicks, Laura Campbell, Henry Madden, J.A. Walker, Mary H, Walker Berry, G.O. Redmeng yA da C ° Overcash, J.C. M4lholland, W.C. Yroutmen, Mrs, M.L. Dickson, Mrs, Euphemia Hoover, A.A. Hill, Mrs. Eva S. Howard, Wilson Vavidson, Clayton W, Cashion, JL, Bass, J.H. Frontis, S. Hoges, S.F. Heath, Mps, AE. Connelly, Lula C. Setzer, Bettie Lewis, Mrs, Flora S. Steele, P.WW. Anderson, Ina M,. Reed, Batts Kloss, Mrs, Anny M, Morrison, Willia “avidson, JeA. Mills, Mrs, “annie B, Misenhour, W.D, “allace, T.H,' Connelly, James M, Cashion, J.L. Padrett, SiA. Moore, Hrs, Ada Williams, Mrs, Yella A, Wards' Helen and Willie TIkerd Lee Malone Mary Tolbert, et al Bessie Lou Hair Dora McNeely John B. Morrison Claude Lowrance Henry Burton, et al Lane and Spencer Nocks James and Eli Campbell Oscar Lee Madden James M, Walker Pascal and Everett Berry Douglass Redmond Ethel Overcash, et al John Milholland, et al J.N, Troutman, (Lunatic) George Dickson, et al Willie Lee Hoover, et al Mattie E, Hill, et al John Max, Howard Rebecca “avidson John §, Yashion Nine Bass, (Imnatic) Sherly and Irving Frontis Albert Hoges Worth Heath, et al Clarence and Yatherine Connelly Ina Maud Setzer, et al y Lewis, et al Flora and Fred Morrison Grace Anderson Jettie Reed Mabel A. Pouwith Julian Ke Morrison John Keaton, (Ediot) Ernest Mills, et al sella Josey Winnie May Wallace Ivillma E.Connelly Miller Ruth Hunter Cashion Roy S, Sharpe, et al Jessie Mae Moore Paul A. Williams . TUESDAY} JULY Sist,, 1925, Nos, 20,and 21 State vs hb John A. Hart TRANSPORT? AND: POSSESS LIQUOR AND DRIVE AUTO WHILE UNDER’ THE INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR AND INTOXICATED, The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel enters a plea of not guilty 4n all of the counts in the bill of indictments. : Jury No, 1’ was sworn and empannelied for their verdict. The evidence was heard and one argument made for the defendant and case was continued over to Wednesday morning, August lst at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. No, 22 State vs Frahk Wilson ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON ON FEMALE, The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel pkzeads not guilty. Jury No. 1 after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant notiguilty°ofranidassault with deadly weapon on a’ female as charged in the bill of indictment, This Honorable Court adJourns until Wednesday morning, August lst., 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. c @) A - TS, AMG Judge Presiding 15th Judicial District. J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court for Iredel1 County. No, 13 State vs Howard Houston CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, The in@ictment carrying a concealed w eapon, the ee with the consent of the datendant, changes ba ndictment charging the defendant with a Forcible arate and to this charge the defendant by his counsel dnick « he State a plea of guilty of Forcible Trespass; 9 ee Solicitor for the State accepts. 2 efore, ordered and adjudged by the Court eshte defendant hand to the Clerk of this Court 4 Treaais Py v25,00 to the use of the public Schools of of the ost that judgment is suspended upon payment . S in this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, ‘Said donation was made, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST lst,, 19235, This Honorable Court convened Wednesday morning, August lst., 1923, at 9:300 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch.of business, State ASSAULT ONTHIS WIFE. vs This case, formerly tried is restored to Mitchell Brawley the docket. It appearing defendant has escaped from custody of J,M.Davis, and failed to comply with his terms of sentence: It is ordered that Capias issue Instanter, to abide the order of the Court, No. State vs Theodore “arren SEDUCTION, In this case, it appears the defendant was arrested charged with seduction as set out in warrant, and that the girl Anna May Daniels and the father agreed with the defendant, to pay into Court $800. to be applied: 1st, to payment of cost and the balance to Anna May Yeniels, Accordingly at this term defendant Pleads Nola Contendre, Judgment is suspended when cost is paid out of the $800. and balance of $800, is paid to Anna May Yaniels and upon condition of his good behavior, Nos, 20 and 21 State vs John A. Hart TRANSPORT AND POSSESS LIQUOR AND DRIVE AUTO WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR AND INTOXICATED, This case is continued over from Jyly 3lst The jurors say they find for their verdict that the defendant is not guilty. in the counts of Transporting and possessing liquor, but that the defendant is guilty of driving an Auto while under the influence of liquor and intoxicated as charged in the bills of indictment on this count, { j I { { f | } t j { No, 16 State 78 on Joe “ate, (Col) BIGAMY,. The Court having permitted the defendant, JR. Maynard, until this term to produce his principal, Joe Tate, and failing to dé so, it is adjudged that the State recover judgment absolute for a bond of 200, but the Court directs the Clerk not to issue execution on this judgment until axter the next term of criminal Court, November 5th., 1923, at which time if the suretyman produces the said Joe Tate in Court and asnwers the indictment against him, the Court may then make such order as it thinks proper. ‘This Honorable Court adjourns until Thursday morning, August end,, 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, Leb hag Judicial District THURSDAY, AUGUST 2nd,, 1923. "his Honorable Court convened Thursday morning, August Qnd,, 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, for the dispatch of business, No. 20 State vs John A. Hart DRIVING AN AUTOMOBILE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR AND INTOXICATED. It appearing to the Court that the defendant was found guilty yeaterday,(Aug. 1st.,0 of driving an Automobile while under the influence of liquor and intoxicated, therefore, It is, oredered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant’ pay a fine of Fifty & no/100 Dollars, ($50.00) and the cost in this case to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. The Court after disposing of the above case took up the Civil docket and transacted the following business, os ison Groc & Produce Co,| ! on Grocery ‘ JK, Morris 2 { Continued for defendant Florida Citrus Exchange j ¥o,_To- Bredy—Printing—o . ePunions vs ov PTBRSRs No, 21 Lumber Co., et al Shersi22 - ’ Continued E.S.@oodin, et al No, 29 irs, W am Wallace Mrs, ¥ — Continued American Railway Express Co, No, 42 7 om Y r land JoW = e Continued Iula Westmoreland No. it: Boieeon i In the Superior Court, vs i ‘i Mabel Pearson {| August Term , 1923. Plaintiff failing to appear and prosecute his action in this case, it is ordered and adjudged by the Zourt that the P. t hereby non-suited and judgment tendered against Aiea testes to be taxed by the Clerk. A No, 54 : Ee Me Yount No, 62 a a . vs J. A. Westmoreland THURSDAY, AUGUST 2nd., 1923. No, 635 J. A, Westmoreland “vs Continued by consent Mrs. M.E,.Westmoreland No. 735 E. E. Shafer, et al vs Continued by consent W.R,Mills and J,P,Mills No. 76 J. M. Lowe VS Continued by consent J. A. Davidson No. 79 Hilliard Summers vs Continued by consent Gertrude Summers No, 12 Norty Carolina, |. ' In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1923, Rutlend Garment Co. | vs { JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT WeWeRankin Co, 4 In the above entitled action plaintiff comes into open Court and through its counsel, Dorman Thompson, takes a voluntary non-sulit: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court, that the plaintiff's cause piston fain ARG the same is, hereby non-suited, Pleintirte y c action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, No. 28 Morris & Co, { vs WeA,Evans & Co, ; It appearing to the Court that this action was one tried in a Justive of the "Peace Court and appealed to the Superior Court by the defendant, but the appeal was never perfected ahd the appeal withdrawn; and that it was placed on the Superior Court docket by error; ‘ Therefore, it is ordered and adjduged the Court that this action be striken from the docketeas y No, 41 Francis “avis | vs { JUDGMENT OF NON-SUIT Will Davis i In the above entitled action plaintiff comes into Court and through her counse, takes a voluntary non*suit: It is, therwfore, ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the plaintiff's caus of" onYbe, J n saa is, hereby non*suited, Pleinti sts of action to be taxed by the Clerk of this burt. All othervactions not dis a posed above in the Non Jury docket are continued to Novenber Term, 1923, No, 19 Brady Printing Co, | vs { Je P. Burns i The defendant moving the court at this term to ae'be 4a this case for him on the account of what he swears Geo. 0 eer vane witness for the defendant, to-wit: that ino o $.7oe court grants his request upon condition ase Pp y a the cost the costs of this term of Court, axed by the Clerk, said payment to be made within t en days, This case is set for trial at the next Civil term and the Clerk will place’ of \CiviR gee for trisi, ONO S408 day Of pee eee Thursday, August 2nd,, 1925, No, 22 Sterling Mills, Inc, The following jurors; A. J. Beaver, J.H.Bass, B.A,Baggerly, B.W. Marshall; J,A,Day, H.A.Barnard, J.S.Waugh, John R, Morrison, 0.5. Shewritt, Floyd Walker, C.F.Leckie and George Campbell, were sworn and empannelled for their verdict, The evidence was heard and one argument made, Case continued over to Friday, August Srd,. vs Saginaw Milling Co, This Honorable Court adjourns until Friday florning, August Srd,, 1925, ot 9:50 o'clock, A.M. (4, A. kg Judge Presiding 15th ipdieral DIStrict. This Honorable Court sonvened Friday morning, August 3rd ; °9 1923, at 9:50 o'clock, A. M. for the dispatch of business, No, 22 case Sterling Mills, Inc, This/was continued over from Thursday, Aug, 2na vs and resumed according to adjournment. The issues Saginaw Milling Co, _ pent appears ofspevor@else where in these utes, No, 60 Mrs, sale, Perris r Jury No, 2 after being duly sworn and empannelled "i or their verdict ans John W. Parris follows: answer the issues submitted as No. 60 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court Iredell County. } August Term, 1923, Mrs. Inla Parris { vs 4 John W. Perris j ist. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the Complaint ? Answer: Yes, 2nd Has the plaintiff been a bona fide ° ident of the Sgate of North Carolina for five years next inmediat os ing commencement of this action ? <r Answer: Yes, Sra, Did the defendant abendon the Plaintiff without any unis leo stale sae Pleintiff and have said plaintiff and defendant, a — Since said abandonment, as alleged in the complaint? 4th. Has the daughter of the parties to this action, Bessie Parris, resided separation ? ed with and been supported by the plaintiff since said Answer: Yes, No, 60 North’ Carolina;} In the S w Iredell County.| August ca, ieee Mrs, tale Perris { ee John W, Parris SUDGERK® This cause coming on to be heard at t ugus he A the Superior Court of Iredell County, before ‘ite wae 2 gees | . 2 ° ° ’ Judge Presidi and a answered by: the’ jury Se’fellonce being heard, and the issues having been w lst. Did the pil allaged in the muatr and defendant intermarry, as alleged =z Answer: Yes, 2nd, Has the pleintirr been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for five of this action 7? yeers next immediately preceding the conmencement Answer: Yes, Srd, Did the defendant ab endon the on the part of the plaintirr end have said phaintaee ond Ree any Tot lived separate since'sa ter: war, id abendonment, as alleged in the complaint 7? 4th, Has the daughter of the parties to this action, Bessie Perris, resided with and b separation ? een supported by the plaintirr Since said Answer: Yes, It is therefore, considered ordered sd econinnt Soy satan saa oy geauing vctoe ow pinned is hereby granted a divorce from the Solentent Gaanee iors sabe cts * ° FRIDAY, AUGUST 3rd,, 1923, It is eomeddered, ordered and adjudged further by the Court that the custody of Bessie “arris, daughter of the parties to this aétion’be, and the game is hereby awarded to the plaintiff, Mrs, Lule Parris,. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. B, F. Long Yudge Presiding, Sin26, 90,94, 38,54, 08, 96,34 34. B24 dt, St Mt dtd, St Bh 9, St 88, 9,98, 91, Led eA LeE Le ESENRSEEAEE SOMES EE EEE EEE ESOT EOE No, 39 North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. August Term, 1923, Maggie Hartley i — { ISSUES vs Millerd Hartley | ole Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North carolina for more than two years 7? Answer; Yes. =2a Were the plaintiff and the defendant married as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, oda Did the defendant, Millard Hartley commit adultry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, No, 39 Nort, Carolina, | In the Supertlor Court, Iredell County. August Term, 19235, vs SUDGMENT Millard Hartley This cause coming to be heard at thés term of Court before His Honor, B. F, Long, udge Presiding, and a jurt, and the jury having answered the issties submitted to them as follows: "Ist"Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years 7? ‘Answer: Yes. 2nd,Were the plaintiff ‘and defendant married as alleged in the complaint 7 Answer: Yes, Srd,Did the defendant Millard Hartley commit adultry, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes," Wherefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff, Maggie Hartley and the defendant, Millard’ Hartley, be, and the same are hereby dissolved and the said Maggie Hartley is hereby granted and absolute divorce from the said Millard Hartley, It is further ordered that the plaintiff, Maggie Hartley pay the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, py, F. Long e e 6s ° : Maggie Hartley | I { FRIDAY, August Srd., 1923, Norty Carolina;}:. In the Superior Court, Iredell County, | August Term, 1923, Chesley Shore { vs } 412 8:9 25 Ella Shore { 1. Has the plaintiff been a resident of th all his life, as alleged in complaint ? e State of North Caroling Answer; Yes, 2. Were the plaintiff and defen the complaint ? — dant married, as alleged in Answer; Yes, S, Did the defendan tn ie ects t, Ella Shore, commit adultry, as alleged Answer: Yes, FRIDAY, August 3rd,, 1923, No, 27 : S. E. Lyons : Jury No, 2 efter being sworn vs and anmnelled for their Mrs, L.A. Mayhew, Administratrix verdict answer the issues of S.C.Lyons, deceased submitted to them as follows: No, 27 Nort, Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) August Term, 1923, S. E. Lyons { vs ! Mrs, L.A.Mayhew, Administratrix }j of S. ©. Lyons, deceased, { UES 1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff for personal services rendered to S. ©. Iyons in her last illness ? Answer: No 2, If So, in what amount ? Answer; | Forts, Vanedina st In the Superior Court, Iredel, County.! August Term, 1923, S. E. Lyons } ve a £8. eR 2 a Ft L. A, Maynew, Administratrix C.T.A. of S. C. Lyons \q This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of Court and being heard by His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding and a jury, end the jury having answered the issue submitted to them as follows: "Tstthe defendant indebted to the plaintiff for personal swrvices rendered to S.C.Lyons in her last iliness? ANSWER: No WHEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff, S*# E. Lyons, shall recover nothing from the defendant, L. A. Mayhew, Administratrix c,t.a, of S.C.lyons in this action, It is further ordered that the platintiff be taxed with the costs in this action. e Pres e JEBHIEGHEIHEHGHEHEHED HEHE raritede SHRMHEHHMHHHHHHHHHHHHHHABHHEHHHE IN THE SUPERIOR CORT, Friday, August, Srd., 1925, No, 22 . North, Gertlina;t™.-. In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1923, Sterling Mills, Inc, { = , : ISSUES Saginaw Milling Co, | ist: In what amount, if anything, is the defendant, Saginaw Milling Comps indebted to the plaintiff ? - : ANSWER; Yes, $468.42 with interest from Jan, ist., 1921. end: Was the interpleader, the Second National Bank of Saginaw, Michigan, an agent for collecting the Draft in question 7? ANSWER: No. ord: Didithe iyterpleader, the Second National Bank of Saginaw, Michigan, become the purchaser and holder of the draft in question for value in due course and without notice of any defenses or equities of the plaintiff ? ANSWER: Yes, No, 22 Nort}, Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ! Auguat, Term, 1923, Sterling’ Mills, Inc, { vs. i JUDGMENT Saginaw Milling Company | This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, B,F,Long, Judge Presidin, and a jury, being heard, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as follows: "lst. In what amount, if anything, is the defendant, Saginaw Milling Company, indébted to the plaintiff ¢ ANSWER: Yes, $468.42 with interest from Jan. ist., 1921. end, Was the interpleader, the Second National Bank of Saginaw, Michigan, an agent for collecting the Draft in question ? ANSWER: No ‘Srd. Did the interpleader, the Second National Bank of Saginaw, Michigan, become the purchaser and holder of the draft in question for value, in due course, and without notice of any defenses or equities‘of the plaintiff 7 ANSWER: Yes," And it appearing to the Court from the report in this case and the admissions of the parties set out in the record: that the plaintiff attached certata funds in the hands of the Peoples Loan and Savings Bank, and that said funds are now in the hands of the Bank by virtue of said attachment and vetng the identical funds paid to said Bank by the Statesville Plour Mills Company on the draft, which the jury have found Was pur@hased by the interpleader, as set out in the third issue above ited, except that by agreement’ and by.agreement of the plaintiff and interpleader, the said Peoples Savings Bank has heretofore remitted to the Second National he sum of $647.63, retaint in its hands 4s garnishee by agreement of all parties to this action, the sum of $550.00, pending’ the out come of this action, It is therefore, co » adjudged and decreed that the warrant of attachment in this proceeding be dissolved and that the interpleader, the Second National Bank of Saginaw, is the omer and entitled to the funds now in the hands of the Peoples Loan and avings Bank of Statesville, North Carolina, : Tt is further considered and adjudged that the Peoples Loan and Savings Berk oc Statesville, North Carolina pay over sala funds to the Clerk ourt. for the use and b a National Bank’ of Saginaw, Michigan, °F ‘Be, interpleader, the Secon . sreinar nneh considered and adjudged that the pleintirr teke nothing against the defendant, the Seginay Matin Co, a FRIDAY, August, Srd,, 1923. der It is further considered and adjudged that the interplea ? the Second National Bank of Saginaw, recover of the plaintiff, the Sterling Mills, Incorporated, the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Cgurt, B. F.’ Longe Judge Presiding, This Honoravle Court adjourns until Monday morning, August 6th,, 1923, at 10:00, o'clock, AM. hh Ac Judge Presiding ae Carstar-Distetot MONDAY, AUGUST 6th 3 SECOND WEEK, IREDELL SUPERTOR COURT, Before, His Honor, B. FP, Long, Judge Presiding, North Carolina, } in the Superior Court, Iredell County. |} August Term, 1923, Second Week, This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00, o'clock, A.M., Mondey morning, August 6th., 1923, when and where His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding for the Fifteenth Judicial District, North Carolina, is present and presiding, this the Second week for Civil cases at August Term, 1923, | | M. P, Alexender, the High Sheriff of Iredel1 County, North Carolina, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors of this Court for the second week for civil cases, to-wit: E.G.Cowan, L,0,White, J, Melvin Dishman, Jas,L,Milholland, Noah Hussey, C.L.Warren, R.A,Elam, W.A, Parker, B.H, Adams, R.C,Morrison, W.F, Boger, P.M.Godfrey, H.C.Dellinger, J.L.Harris, H.G. Morrison, W.W, Tolbert, J.L,Steele, J.P,Ostwalt, W.F. Edwards, R.L.Shoemaker and W.W.Merlow, The following were returned,"Not to be found," W.R.Bost, The following were excused on the account siclmess: R.E. Armfield end J.P,Mills, The following were sworn as Petit jurors: No, 78 seal rou feewse Baber go" Superior Yarn Mills, Inc, | Charlotte Waste Uompany 5 Te. In what amount, is the defendant indebted to the Plaintiff on account of goods sold and delivered, as alle : gooc x a : ged in the complaint 7 ANSWER: $1035.82, with interest from May 25th., 1923. No, 78 North Carolina, | I S n the Superior Court Iredel, County,} August Term, 1923, : Superior VemmiMills, Inc, } vs J Charlotte Waste Company j UDGMENT This cause coming on to be heard at tl ne A me aobeapa the i age County, before His Ronee, 8. Pikseas aon jury, ury naving answered the issues sub itted vor of the plaintiff ana against the da "an t efendant, as ecieatet is therefore now considered, ordered ta oubuiees that che grsints. ar of the defendant the sum of $1035.82, with interest ordered and adjedged tant the plaintiff wenbver rane “det been’ Ane - 6 costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of inde Cours: is B. F, Long Judge Presiding, TR ete teats cece tet 20 90 oe MONDAY, AUGUST 6thy, 10925. Ollie Honeycutt { “WS { ITSSsSvUES George Honeycutt | . ist, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the complaint ? ANSWER: Yes, : end, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years prior to the filing of the compalint in this action ? ANSWER: Yes, Srd, Did the defendant commit adultry, as alleged in the complaint 7 Answer: Yes, Norty Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1923, Ollie Honeycutt vs JUDGMENT George Honeycutt | This cause coming on to be’ heard at this term before His Honor, Judge B. F, Long and a jury, and being heard and the jury having answered the issues as follows; "(1) Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint ? ANSWER: Yes, (2) Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years prior to the filing of the compalint in this action ? ANSWER: Yes, (3) Did the defendant conmit adultry as alleged in the Complaint ? ANSWER: Yes," It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the marriage relations heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same is hereby dissolved and that the’ costs be taxed by the Clerk of this Court as provided by Statute, B. F. Long Judge Yresiding, No, 30 We. M. Drwn The following good and lawful men were i vs sworn and empannelled for their verdict Hutton & Bourbonnais Co, in this case: E.G,Cowan, Jas{L,.Milholland, Noah Hussey, R.A, Elam, W.A, Parker, B,H. } Adams, R.C,Morrison, W.F.Boger, P.M, TL.Steele, The case was continued over Godfrey, H.C,Dellinger, H.G,.Morrison and to Tuesday morning, Aug. 7th., 1923, z This Honorable Court ene until Tuesday morning, August 7th,, 1925, at 9:30, o'clock, A.M. Tuesday, August 7th,, 1923, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment at Tuesday morning, August 7th,, 1923, at 9:30, o'clock, A.M, for the dispatch of business, No, 30 W. Me Drum { This case béing continued over from Monday vs ‘ § August 6th,, 1923, was taken up and tue jury Hutton & Bourbonnais Co, | answered the issues submitted as follows: No. 30 Nort, Carolina, | ! In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ] August Term, 1923, W. M. Drum i vs 0 TSSsSveEeS Hutton & Bourbonnais Co, | 7 I, Did plaintiff and defendant, on or about October 4th., 1920, enter into a second contract, wherein it was agreed by them that — plaintiff should cut and deliver to defendant 60,000. nore feet of lumber, at the price of $25;00 per thousand, to be cut according to Specifications by defendant, and to be delivered at a place designated by defendant, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: No Did tt f “1 ] 1€ defendant commit a breach of said ie the Seite a contract, as alleged ANSWER: : i ete ee if any, is the plaintirr entitled to recover ? LO We LEIt g nathan ei ace No, 30 North Carolina; | In the Su Cour Iredell County. | August con, eee” We M, Drum i vs ; JUDGMNE Hutton & Bourbonnais Co, { We This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the-Court before His Honor ’ Be F Long, udge Pr si « 5 v 6s iding # and a jury 9 and the yur y Did the plaintiff ana defendant on or about Oct 20 enter into a second contract, wherein it was agreed by Shem take ahaseeate er to defendant 60,000 more feet of lumber, at the according to specifications and to be d a defendant, as alleged in the usenet at a place designated by Answer: Wo Did thé in the complaint Answer: ak. Aadenieat Commit a breach of sata contract, as alleged eee eter eetaeatanee What dama Answer: Eos. 1f any, It is, that plaintiff tak hereof without day, cost 6f action ame is the plaintirr entitled to recover 7? Tuesday, August 7th,, 1923, No, 77 Borth Carolina; } In the Superior Court, TIredel1 County, § August Term, 1923, Laura V,. Norris} vs % ISSUES Ira D, Norris I Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the complaint 7° ANSWER: Yes, II is the plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina, and has she been a resident of the State for five years and more immediately preceding the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint ? ANSWER: Yes, Tit Has there been a separation between the plaintiff and defendant, and have they lived separate and apart for five successive years, and has the plaintiff resided in this State for that period, =s alleged in the complaint ? ANSWER: Yes, No ° Ta North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County, { August Term, 1923, vs $ JUDGMENT Laura V. Norris] Ira D, Norris 4j This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted by the Court, as follows, to-wit: I "Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes, Zt Is the plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina, end has she been a resident of the State for five years and more immediately preceding the conmencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint 7? ~ Answer, Yes, See Has there been a separation between the plaintiff and defendant, and have they lived separate and apart for five Successive years, and has the plaintiff resided in this State for that period, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes," It is, therefore, considered, adjduged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing™between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are, hereby dissolved, and that the custody of the minor children of said marriage, to-wit: Walker Norris, Lois Norris and Heln Norris be awarded to Mrs, Laura V, Norris, plaintiff in this action, It is further considered and adjudged that the cost of this action be paid by the plaintiff, ' B. F, Long Judge Presiding. Tuesday, August 7th,, 1925, a Wednesday , August eth. ioes. 9 . This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment No. 38 , W, H, Wood The following jurors: J.GsHorn, C.1.Warren ee ea: Teneo. GE B1S0 9 'O1CENy ; vs. H.C.Dellinger, A.T.Weisner, H.G.Morr Mooresville Cotton Mills W.W,Tolbert, 5.L. Steele, WF. Rdvards, Wet ee re ne Merlow, P.H.Goodin, R.leShoemaker and" No. 33 . W. Mopre wére > duly sworn and North Carolina; |} _ In the Superior Court, empannelled for their verdict, After ugu . apart of the evidence for the plaintitt 3S, Iredel1 County. | 4 st Term, 1925, was continued over to Wednesday morning, G. Ober & Sons Co, . | August 8th, JUDGMENT vs 0 Bradford & Hedrick fj This cause coming to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, B. F. Long, and it appearing that plaintiff { 4 asks for a non-suit: This Honorable Court adjourns until Wednesday morning, It'is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff is hereby August 8th., 1923, at 9:30, o'clock, A.M. Te ne Meee eee, Oe BASIEEETT, Judge tresiding 15th Judictal District, B, F, Long Juage Yresiding, No. 67 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. August Term, 1923, vs JUDGMENT i A, L. Pearson Mabel Pearson {| : This cause coming on to be heard at this, August term of Superior Court of Iretell County before, His Honor, B.F.Long, Judge Presiding, and being heard, upon motion of A, L. Pearson, through his counel that he be allowed to take a voluntary non- suit: It is, therefore, ordered and adjduged that the plaintiff be allowed to take a judgment of non-suit. It is further ordered by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk, B. F, Long Judge Frresiding No. 3674 Nort, Carolina; | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1923, Otis Lyons, ¢% JUDGMENT VS S. P, Mayhew, et al This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Iredell Superior Court, and being heard before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff submits to @ non-suit; It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Plaintiff be, and the same is hereby non-suited, and that the cost of this action be taxed against the plaintiff, Be FP, er : : e eéiding, Wednesday, August 8th., 1923, No. 38 W. He. Wood This case was continued over from Tuesda vs August 7th., 19235, the case was f Mooresville Cotton Mills and given to the jury at 6:00 ao >’ P.M, Case continued over to Thurs day morning, Aug. 9th., 1923, This Honorable Court adjourns until Thursday morning, August 9th., 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, (3. A. ag Judge Presicing, Thursday, August 9th.,, 1923, This Honorable Court convened fhursday morning, August 9th,, 1925, at 9:50 o'clock, &.M. for the dispatch of business, No. 58 W. He Woods { This case’was continued over from vs { Wednesday, August 8th., 1923, Mooresville Cotton Millis } The jury answered the issues submitted to them as follows: No, 58 North Carolina,|} In the Superior Court, Iredell County, | | August Term, 1923, W. H. Wood, { vs ‘4 +S8 0B S Mooresville Cotton Mills, Inc,.} (a) 3 Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint 7? Answer: Yes, (2) 2 Did‘ the plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his own injury, as alleged in the answer 7? Answer: No (3) What demages, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover 7 Answer: $1500.00, Thursday, August 9th,, 1925, No, 22 Sterling Mills, Inc. vs Saginaw Milling Co, The plaintiff moves to set aside the verdict for errors committed in the omission of’ evidence and for errors in the charge of the Court. Motion denied, Defendant excepts. Judgment, Exception. Plaintiff abeals to the Supreme Court. Notice of appeal waived, Bond in sum of $50. adjudged sufficient, Thirty days given the defendant to make up case on appeal and thirty days thereafter given to the interpleader in which to file exceptions or serve counter-case, No. 26 State vs Rufus Lavender It appearing to the court that this convict has escaped, it is ordered that the Clerk issue Capias for him anywhere in Nortpn Carolina where he may be found, It is also ordered that the Clerk shall issue a Capias to the Sheriff of Iredell or any of his deputies, and he or of his deputies may execute the same anywhere in the State of North Carolina where the defendant may be found, If the Sheriff ancurs any reasonable expense in arresting this convict the Court will make order that the officer be indenmified for such expense, No. State vs Foy Campbell STORE”BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, The defendant, by his counsel, Buren Jurney waives bill of indictment and pleads guilty. For the Charge of House-breaking the sentence is that he be imprisoned in the county jail for SIXTEEN MONTHS, and assigned to work on the county roads of Tredeil county, As to the other count, judgment suspended on co good behavior, ndition that he be of { ; t | j { } { { No. State LIBEL vs Defendant having agreed to a / ppear in Court at - M. Goodman 1:50 o'clock, P.M., failed to appear and was called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias, No. 61 North Carolina, | In the Su erior Cour Iredell County, | August for, 1923, ” Statesville Chair Company i vs J Carolina Portland Cement Company UDGMEN This cause coming on to be heard b efore His Honor, B.F,Lo Soaite ene ane ot ioe eee’ Term, 1923, of the Superior Court of Tredell to this acti ng heard, and it appearing to the Court that the parties sentedberay eeu cae apd Sener anined the matters and things in pisintitt the amount agreed anes the defendant has paid to the Ss therefore considered and ad udged by t e rather meataiy ches alll aeimige in this caune’ Se nem Rleskoraed ane sa that the plaintarf e defendant is hereby released from further liability; recover nothing further in this action; and that the defen ‘ dant pay the costs of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of thés Courts B. Fs Lo BY CONSENT: Judges PresTaINE ee Thursday, August 9th., 1925. No. 49 é The B.F.Goodrich Rubber Co.| Jury No. 2 after being duly sworn vs § and empannelled for their verdict Flake Holland answer-the issues submitted to them as follows: "me B.F,Goodrich Rubber Co,]| vs 6 Is sv EBs Flake Holland : In the defendant indebted to the plaintiff. if so, in what amount ? Answer: Yes, #219,.65 with interest from time due, No, 49 North Carolina, |} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 19235, The B, F, Goodrich Rubber Co. | vs j JUDGMENT Flake Holland t This cause coming—on to be heard at this the August Term, 1923, of Iredell Superior Court, before His Honor, Judge B. F. Long, presiding and a jury, and it appear to the Court that judgment by default an} inquiry was en ered in this cause by the Clerk of the Super Court on the 26th day of January, 1923, the inquiry instituted at this term of Court and jury, and that the jung by their verdict having found thet the Gefendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $219.65 with interest thereon from Sth day of January, 1925, until paid, Whereupon, it is considered and ordered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $219.65 with interest thereon from 5th day of January, 1925, until paid together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. B,' F,. Long Judge fresiding. ‘This Honorable Court adjourns Until Friday morning, August 10th., 1923, at 9:30, o'clock, A.M. fh, A 8 np cia District of North Carolina, Friday, August 10th., 1923, This Honorable Court convened according to adjournment on Friday, August 10th,, 1925, No, 38 We He Wood { vs. t Mooresville Cotton Mills | It is agreed by counsel on both sides to call Court with power to sign judgment in this case at any time between now and November Term, 1923, to sign judgment as of this term, This Honorable Court adjourns Sine Die, 4b. A Judge Presiding 15th., Judicial Districy of North Carolina, Nortn Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredel; County. § Before the Clerk. Cerolina Motor Company vs P,H,Lazenby, P.R, Lazenby and J,N,“arron This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 20th day of August, 1923, the same being the third Monday in said month and it appearing to the Court that the summons was duly 4ssued on the 17th day of July, 1923, and duly served on each defendant on the 20th day of said month, and that the return day set forth in said summons was on 28th day of July, 1923, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint on the return day, and that the defendants are duly indebted to the plaintiff on two notes, one for the sum of $640.00 and interest from the 12th dey of Jenuery, 1922, until paid, and the other for the sum of $600,00 and interest from the 3lst day of May, 1922, until paid, and that said sums are certain as set forth in said notes, and that the defendants or either of them heve failed and neglected to file an answer to said complaint, and that more than twenty days have passed since said return date: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the pheintiff recover of the defendants, P.H,Lazenby, P.R,Lazenby and 3.N.5arron, judgment: ; lst, for the sum of $640.00 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 12th day of January, 1922, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annun, end, For the sum of $600,00 and interest thereon from the 3lst day of May, 1922, until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, 3rd, For the defendants to pay the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This the 20th day of August, 1925, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior court of Tredel. County. SHHMMEMEN HHA Nort, Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | : Before the Clerk, Carolina Motor Company vs i JUDGMENT P,H,Lazenby and P,R,Lazenby | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court on the 20th day of August, 1923, the same being the third Monday of said month, and it appearing to the Court that the summons was issuws on the 17th day of July, 1923, and served on euch of the defendants on the 20th day of said month, and that the return day set forth in the summons was on the 28th day of said July, 1925, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified compaaint on said return date, and that the said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff on two notes, one for the sum of $407.50 and interest on same from the Slst day of May, 1922, until paid, and the other for the sum of $400.00 and interest from September, 50th, 1922, until paid, and that said amounts are certain befing due on notes, and that the defendants have failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to said compaaint, and that more than twenty days have passed since said return date? It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that plaintiff recover hudgment against said defendants, P.H,Lazenby and P, R, tazenby: lst, For the sum of $407.50 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 3lst day of May, 1922, until paid, end, For the sum of $400.00 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 30th day of September, 1922, until paid, ord, For the defendants to pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This Aggust 20th,, 1923, J. A, Hartness Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County. Before the Clerk, North tig a | In the Superior Court, Tredell County.{ Monday, August 135th., 1923. Cc, C. Newton vs JUDGMENT OF VOLUNTARY NON-SUIT E. E. Newton This cause coming on to be heard before J,A,Hartness, C.S.C. and the plaintiff through his counsel, 2.V.Turlington comes in Court and takes a voluntary non-suit: It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby non-suited and that the Court cost be taxed against the plaintiff. J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Comrt. This Monday, August 135th., 1925, Cost paid, SOS lod ted lad foak be Dla tech te Pha Oa PM lat foot fuel Co ot Col VN AAA oy TON OE North Carolina,| I, the Superior Court, Iredell County.| Before the Clerk, Fieldon Privette | vs 6 oUDGxz BAS John M. Privette | This cause coming on to be heard upon the record and the pleadings, and it appearing therefrom that the defendant has been duly served and summoned by publication, and has filed no demurer or answer to the complaint, and that the time for filing pleadings has elapsed; and it further appearing that the complaint is duly verified, and sets s3ntK forth two causes of action, each consisting of a breach of an express zm contract to pay absolutely suns of money fixed by the terms of said z contract, to-wir: The first cause of action for the failure to pay the sum of $350.00, money loaned the defendant by plaintiff, with interest theres thereon from the first day of October, 1916, until paid, and the second cause of action, for the failure to pay the sum of 9400.00, the amount agreed to be paid plaintiff by the defendant for the purchase of a tract of land, with interest thereon from the 10th day of September, 1917; and it further appearing from the examination of the plaintire on oath that no payments have been made to the plaintiff, or ang other person, for his use, on account of said indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff, but that the whole indebtedness, with interest, is now due and unpaid; and it further appearing that the warrant of attachment issued in this cause has been duly served on the defendant by publication as provided by law, and required by the Court, and that said warrant of attachment has been duly served by the sheriff, levying on the lands of the defendant, situated in New Hope Township, Iredell County, North Carolina, containing 82 acres, more or less, and being Lot Nos 1 in the division of land in the special proceeding entitled,"S.R. Privette vs J.M.Privette, et al," For a particular description see report of commissioner in said special proceeding recorded in Special Proceeding Decket No, ll, page 164 in this office, It is, therefore, considered, adjudged sed and decreed that the Bieiatitt Deasver of the defendan* the’ sie at Ses0cG0, mith satan §350, om the first day of October, 1916, until paid, and interest on $400,00 Prom the lOth da is with ta wes ne tees me eeptember, 1917, until paid, together it is further considered and adjudged that said the Second Monde: of This Sept, 10th., 1925, . J. 4. fertness ork Of Superior Court o County, PHOL SE IR IG 20 de 96 20 Settedts PIP Ihat see ses Ieee bs North Carolina,|} In the Superior Court, Tredell County, | Before the Clerk, Commercial Credit Company } vs { JUDGMENT R.A. Douglass I This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 9th: day of August, 1923, plaintiff procured a summons and a writ of claim and delivery, for possession of the car hereinafter mentioned, to be issued against the defendant, returnable on the 20th day of August, 1923, end that said summons and writ of claim and delivery was duly served on the defendant on the 9th day of August, 1923, and that the defendant having failed to give the replevy bond for the hereinafter mentioned car, said car was delivered by the Sheriff to the plaintiff pending the final termination of this action; and it further appearing that this is an action on a note to cover the amoynt due thereon, and which defendant h-3 fatled to pay, to-wit: $124.50, and for the possession of said automobile; and it further appearing that on the 18th day of August, 1923, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in said action, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date of said summons, and that defendant has failed to appear and asnwer or demur to said verified complaint of plaintiff; and it further appearing that the indebtedness due the plaintiff is secured by a conditional sale agreement wherein the title to one ford runabout, model T, Motor No, 5895419, is reserved wntil said indebtedness aforesaid is fully paid; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is now due and owing the plaintiff the sum of $124.50; and it further appearing that under the aforesaid conditional sale agreement that in case of default by the defendant that the seller has the right to take possession of the car, and sell the same at public or private sale at any time thereafter without any notice to the buyer. It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the pleintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $124.50, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Court, It is further cohsidered and adjudged that this judgment for $124.50 and cost aforesaid be, and the same is, hereby declared to be and constitute a specific lien upon the above nentioned car, and that plaintiff is entitled to the possession of said Automobile under said sale agreement, It is further considered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff be, and he is hereby, authorized to sell said car at either public or private sale, without further notice to the defendant, and that he credit the amount received from said sale, after first paying the costs of this action on this judgment. This 10th day of September, 1923. J, A, Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court, North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredell County.]| Before the Clerk, Fieldon Privette | vs JUDGMENT John M. Privette | This cause coming on to be heard upon the record and the pleadings, and it appearing therefrom that the defendant has been duly served and summoned by publication, and has filed no demurer or answer to the complaint, and that the time for filing pleadings has elapsed; and it further appearing that the complaint is duly verified, and sets tunty forth two causes of action, each consisting of a breach of an express Em contract to pay absolutely sums of money fixed by the terms of said z contract, to-wir: The first cause of action for the failure to pay the sum of $350.00, money loaned the defendant by plaintiff, with interest theres thereon from the first day of October, 1916, wntil paid, and the second cause of action, for the failure to pay the sum of $400.00, the amount agreed to be paid plaintiff by the defendant for the purchase of a tract of land, with interest thereon from the 10th dey of September, 1917; and it further appearing from the examination of the Plaintiff on oath that no payments have been made to the plaintiff, or any other person, for his use, on account of said indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff, but that the whole indebtedness, with interest, is now due and unpaid; and it further appearing that the warrant of attachment issued in this cause has been duly served on the defendant by publication as provided by law, and required by the Court, and that said warrant of attachment has been duly served by the Sheriff, levying on the lands of the defendant, situated in New Hope Township, Iredell County, North Carolina, containing 82 acres, more or less, and being Lot Nos 1 in the division of land in the Special proceeding entitled,"S.R. Privette vs J.M.Privette, et al,” For a particular description see report of commissioner in said special proceeding recorde in Special Proceeding Docket No, 11, page 164 in this office, It is, therefore, considered adjudg ’ zed and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $750,00, with interest on 7550.00 from the first day of October, 1916, until paid, and interest on $400,00 from the 10th day of ¢ with ant WES cf teas eeblan: september, 1917, until paid, together it is further considered and adju éd that said deme s @ lien on the lands attached by the ieaeaht feu the rari ria : cause, and that said lands be sold under execution ed tae Lens ea S provided by law in such cases, ay oO % This Sept, l0th,, 1925, P “wher, 1925, J.A, Hertness ‘ Clerk oF superior Court of Tfredell County, S2..8%, a SSIS ES IPTG Ahhe e428 50 se ee se 0 5 a D TOTES SESE SENS North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | Before the Clerk, Commercial Credit Company | vs j JUDGMENT R.A. Douglass This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that on the 9th: day of August, 1923, plaintiff procured a summons and a writ of claim and delivery, for possession of the car hereinafter mentioned, to be issued against the defendant, returnable on the 20th day of August, 1923, and that said summons and writ of claim and delivery was duly served on the defendant on the 9th day of August, 1923, and that the defendant having failed to give the replevy bond for the hereinafter mentioned car, said car was delivered by the Sheriff to the plaintiff pending the final termination of this action; and it further appearing that this is an action on a note to cover the amoynt due thereon, and which defendant has failed to pay, to-wit: $124.50, and for the possession of said automobile; and it further appearing that on the 18th day of August, 1923, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in said action, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date of said summons, and that defendant has failed to appear and asnwer or demur to said verified complaint of plaintiff; and it further appearing that the indebtedness due the plaintiff is secured by a conditional sale agreement wherein the title to one ford runabout, model T, Motor No. 5895419, is reserved until said indebtedness aforesaid is fully paid; and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is now due and owing the plaintiff the sum of $124.50; and it further appearing that under the aforesaid conditional sale agreement that in case of default by the defendant that the seller has the right to take possession of the car, and sell the same at public or private sale at any time thereafter without any notice to the buyer, It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $124.50, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Court, It is further cohsidered and adjudged that this judgment for $124,50 and cost aforesaid be, and the same is, hereby declared to be and constitute a specific lien upon the above mentioned car, and that plaintiff is entitled to the possession of said Automobile under said sale agreement, It is further considered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff be, and he is hereby, authorized to sell said car at either public or private sale, without further notice to the defendant, and that he credit the amount received from said sale, after first paying the costs of this action on this judgment. This 10th day of September, 1923, Os: De Hertness Clerk of the Superior Court, *qguspuoetep soy A£ous0zzy SSNOUUOUUBYS “If *T oe Bouton ay 4309095 Aq *uosawouy, usuLTOG :quowSpnf [TeuptTy BupyoBeato0oxy oy OF quesuocod oe}, *faun0n TTepedlt yO 4amop awoTuedns yueTo Ssouyreyl “vy °L *Sce6t fsequeydes so Aep 4ST STUL *pesreuostp £qousy oue foyy pus ‘eq Uoszeuy sotye.ms 944 pus *‘UOTIZOe Stuy UT JITIUTeTA 943 Aq pseynytysuyt sSutpeoooad VUSUTIOSVIYS SU UT JUBspPUS TEP fq peynoexe euoyoyouey puog oyuy 4eUuy peZpnf{ps pue peaepao LOUZINS SF YF PUY “*HAOTO 99 Aq pexeq oq 04 SUOTIOS Stuy fo S}SOO OU} PUB OS*ZITS JO uMs 944 YUBpUeTEep ely JO AeAOCDSA pues eAvey Op JITIUTETA ouy 4eUy poSpnfpe pue pedmepuo *‘yuepuejep sos feui0jyys fesnoyuouusys MH’ JO quesuoo oy YyTM pus fq *zgTQUTeTd aoyzy Lour07zy ‘ucsdwouy, ueutog JO UOFZOW UO feaoyedeuy ST +F ‘esned pTus UT pelts domsue pus yuteTduoo o44 UT 4NO 4eS sz9844 bu ou} JO ynoO SutMous pus Zuystue quepuesep euy Aq 47 eNp syuNoue TTS JO UOFZPOBISTyes pues quowked TINT ut OS*ZITS ydevow 07 pequesuoD SBY JITIUFETA O43 FBZ YuN0D SU} 07 Bupuvedde yy pus *peEeTTs SAO FOPOLOY AOMSUG PUB JUTeTdWOS Uc *£q4uN0D TTepear yo uofuedns ou} JO HAeTO e4z Aq paeoy eq 04 UO Butwoo osneo sTUL 1 eSueyoxy susrzTO BptstoTa LNGNDOadne | sa J} °°D eonpoug x froooarpy tos dao oA. *MMOTD S84} Suosog j°4qun09 Trepeal « qMog LOTuedns ouy UT jfeuTToreg aon North Caroline, Tredell County A.D-Robbins Vv ( 8 ) Paul Brown and ( David Brown ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and it appeer- Before the Clerk. JUDGMENT. ing to the gourt tnut the plaintiff and defendants have compromised their 4ifferences and settled all claims. Now plaintiff takes non-suit. This Oot. 1lst,1923. JA rtness aac Superior Court Approved by wis Lewis Statatit? Attorney North Caroline, Submission of controversy without action in the Iredell County. Superior Court. Charlie Johnson and wife et al, vs UDGMERTD W. FP. Pressly. This cause coming on to be neard before His Honor B.F. Long, Judge, and being heard upon an agreed cash submitted to the Court under Section 626 of the Consolidated Statutes, the Court the deed from Angeline Johnson to Sra day of November, 1919, being of the opinion that Emmett M. Houston, bearing date of the and recorded in Book 62, page 584, and which is fully set out in the case agreed, vests in the said Bmmett M. Houston the fee simple title to the land therein described. It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed by the Houston was seized in fee simple of the ana that the pleintiffse, mda neither Court that Emmett M. lands described in seid deed, of them, took any interest in seid land under the deed from Angeline Johnson to ssid Emmett M. Houston. It is further considered and adjudged that the said W.F.Pressly, mort. gagee, is entitled to foreclose the mortgege executed by the said Emmett M. Houston and wife to the said W.¥.#ressly to secure the sum therein named. Cost taxed against the plaintiffs. fhis the 8th day of October,1925. —yeathent Jaleo of the 18th ——— esiden ge 6 oO Jud. District. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk. W.A.Evens, Trading as Evans Motor Company, oa JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL ©. S. Martin This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard on Monday, the 8th day of October,1923, and the plaintiff having voluntarily taken & non-suit as to his second cause of action only, upon the open account, in order that the matter may not have to be submitted to a jury upon inquiry, and it appearing to the Court that on the 20th day of August, 1923, the plaintiff procured a summons to be issued against the defendant, returnable on the Sra day of September, 1923, and that said summons was duly served on the defendant person@ ally on the 24th day of August, 1923, and it further appearing that this is an action on two notes to recover the amount due thereon, which the defendant has failed to pay, to-wit: $1265.93, with inter@ est from Octoder 8th,1923, until paid, and it further appearing that on the 2rd day of September,1923, the plaintiff filed « duly verified complaint in thie action and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the return date of said summons, and that the defendant has failed to appear and answer or demur to said verified complaint of the plaintiff and it further appearing that a part of the indebted- ness due the plaintiff is secured by a title note agreement, wherein the title to one Model E 2709 2-1/2 ton Bethlehem Truck is reserved in the plaintiff until gaia indebtedness is fully paid by the defendant, and it further appearing to the court that, under the aforesaid conditional sales agreement, that in case of default by the defendant, the plaintiff has a right to take possession of the car andi sell the same at public or private sale at any time thereafter, without any notice, and that the defend- ant is now gndebted ¢6 the plaintiff in the sum of $1265.93. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $1265.93, with interest from October 8th,1923, until peid, together with the costs of this auction to be taxed by the Court. It is further ordered and adjudged that of said amount, the gum of $760.93 and costs as aforesaid, be, and the same is hereby declared a specific lien upon said 2-1/2 ton Bethlehem Truck, and to this end, it is considered and adjudged and decreed that execution issue, directing the sheriff to levy upon and taken into his possession said truck and advertise and sell the same free and discharged from any claim of the defendant, said levy, adver- tisement and sele to be made as required for sales of personal property under execution. J. Ae Hartness erk oO uperior Cour North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk James E. Tharpe --~---Plaintiff ve } JUDGMENE ) Will Young and wife ---Defendantsa. This cause coming on to be heard, before J.4.Hartness, Clerk of Superior Court, Iredell County, on the 29th day of September, 1923, and being heard upon the evidence offered by the plaintiff, the defendant having failed to appear, and answer; the Court finds as fact: (1) That notice of this action , and the issuance of the sum- mons, stating the names of the parties, the amount of the claim, and the nature of the action, and requiring the defendants to appear, at the time und place named, and answer or demur to the complaint, has been duly published as the law directs. (2) That summons has been duly served on defendants in person. (3) It is therefore, upon a hearing of the evidence of the plaintiff, the defendants having failed to appeur, and raise an issue of fact, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the de- fendants the sum of $200.00 with interest from lst day of July,1923, &t 6% per aunum until paid, and the costs of this action. It is further ordered and adjudged by the court that judgment be rendered against the defendants for the amount above named, said Judgment to be discharged upon the payment into Court of the said sum of $200.00 with interest, as above specified. this get Gay of October,1923. J.4.Hartness Clerk of Superior Court North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk. James EB. Tharpe ««<«~-«<--<-Plaintiff iy ZURGMENTZ Irvin Chambers and Henry B. Mose ~---«-00-~~----Defendants ) This cause coming on to be heard before J.4 Hertness, Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County, on the 29th day of September, 1923, and being heard upon the evidence offered by the plaintiff, the defendant having failed to appear, and answer; the Court finds ae facts: (1( That notice of this action, and the issuance of the sum- mons, stating the names of the parties, the amount of the claim and the nature of the action, and requiring the defendanta to appear at the time and place named, and answer or demur to the complaint, has been duly published as the law directs. (2) That summons has been duly served on defendants in person. (3) It is therefore, upon & heuring of the evidence of the plaintiff, the defendants having failed to appear, and raise an issue of fact, ordered and sdjudged thut the plaintiff recover of the defendsents the sum of $90.00 with interest from 19th day of December, 1922, at 6% per annum until paid, and the costs of this action. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be rendered against the defendants for the amount above named, said judgment to be discharged upon the payment into Court of the said sum of $90.00, with interest, as above specified. mis @= day of October, 1923. J. A. Hartness erk Superior Court MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5th., 1923, Nort; Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell; VJounty,. November Term, 1923, Be it remenbered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the State and County aforesaid, on the 9th Monday after the 1st Monday in September, 1923, the same being the 5th day of November, AyD, 1925, His Honor, B, F, Long, Judge and presiding in the 15th Judicia: District of North Carolina, is present and presiding, and the Hon, Zeb, V. Long, Solicitor and Prosecuting Attorney, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, M. P, Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this them, to-wit: The following were dram as Grand Jurors for the term; J.F.“atton, R.L.Poston, J.G.Pope, W.B.Crawford, H.J.Cook, Ervin Steele, G.H.Johnson, \/.L.Goodson, J.B.Houston, H.A.White, W.C.Lazenby, J.A,Campbell, L.H.Bradshar, C,A.,McLelland, J.E. Sprinkle, A.A.Kyles, 0.M.Turbyville and A.C.Cavin, R.L.Poston was appointed and sworn as Foreman of the Gragd azenby was sworn as officer in charge of the Jury. H.C,Warrexa was returned as being dead, E.B,¥Young and J.D,Browm were excused on the account of Siclmess, W.D,McLelland was: excused on account of business relation, -L.Summers, G,.T.,Mitchell, T.C.Shappe, C.B.Stewart and J,Will Robertson were returned not to be found, The following were returned and sworn as petty jurors; L.H.White, W.A,Watts, E,J,Hair, E.W.Feimster, L,A,Dagenhart, M, L. York and J,uM, Templeton, The following were sworn as Tales Jurors: E,L.Goodinn, C.R.York, Harvey Mullis, E.W,Estes, M.E.Godfrey, , No, 1 State TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVGOR vs f Defendant’ appeared and showed good behavior Ralph Rogers was dismissed, ave No, No, 16 State vs Lonnie Honeycutt Tr Sea \eavis NE eS RD ped et DE Se De ee NE pe ee EE AC OE BE pO oe MONDAY, November 5th., 1923, TO SHOW D BEHAVIOR, a appeared and showed good behavior and was dischargéd, by the Court, PEAR AND SHOW efendant was called Nisi Sci Fa and Capias, GOOD BEHAVIOR, end failed, Judgment SISTING AN i Capias BEHAVIOR Court that Ivey en sentenced to a shington, D.C. by the U.S. therefore is is appearance for good ordered Smith, Grudger failed, ’ : Vaplas PMUWTAUTTA esata. VLU ane 1 wr 3 and showec Tomer order, » has ‘ | Ac ry tna ne aeiendagég name Ovwepenaa) Vs aAsdil Ce r defendant PROPERTY FOR LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendent comes inté o en C ta ee -t and through his counsel enters a P ous plea of 1t Ss rsed the bill of indictment, ee eee oe ies te - ordered and adjudged by the Court that ag: 3 Suspended on payment of the cost and fdr year 1904 no's he appear at each Criminal Term ° adjudged sufficient, S208 Peet. So No. 12 State vs S$; M. Goodman A CVO Dd tie Ci berep4; No,:: 28 State vs Arthur Gaither lo, 19 >tate Vv June Troutman Davidson No, 13 state vs Robert Gentle Monday, Ny A A A eo j { 4 : t : ' t ' { ‘ ‘ ' ( 4 : November Sth,., 1923, TBE IBE e vraal int waives bill by his Counsel and tenders £6 the State a plea of Forcible Trespass which the Solicitor accepts, and defendant also in connection with his plea Retracts any words he may have spoken or written defamatory to the officers, as all@gepetnohzeupenrmntion of the Solicitor judgment is suspended upon payment of the costs and good behavior, DISPOSING OF CROP WITHOUT PAYING LANDLORD, Defendant comes into open Court and pleads guilty as charged in the bill of indictment, It appearing to the Court that the defendant has settled his rents with his landlord, R.F,. Gaither, The Solicitor moves for suspension of Judgment upon the defendant's good “béhavior end payment of the costs. This motion is granted and defendant is in the custody of the Court until payment of all the its It. ie aiso adjudged by the Court that be of goos behavior in the furture ATIT.7P WT CRP ToOTTA TN. TUT wy Jefendant comes into open Court and through his counsel Buren Jurney tenders a plea of guilty of Simple essault, which plea is accepted a the Solicitor for the State It appearing to the Court that the defendant owes the prosecuting witness R P. Sprinkle $36.00 and 94,00 interest on said principal and further that said R.?.Sprinkle was caused to pay out $25.00 Doctor bill for injuries on account of said assault, ne ger pact It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay the principal, interest and Doctor Bill, 911 amounting to $65.00 and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this NOR UNDER SIXTEEN YEARS OF AGE TO CATE A MOTOR TRUCI Defendant enters a plea of not guilty. After hearing all of the evidence for the State and the defendant the Solicitor for the State recommends end moves for a verdict of not guilty, therefore, It is ordered by the Court that a verdict of not guilty be entered, ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT RAPE. The State's witness Susie Robinscn called and failed, It is ordered by the Court that a fine of $25.00 be entered against the said Susie Robinsm, LARCENY & RECEIVING, The State's witnesses Robert Owens and Thumas Freeman called and failed, It is ordered by the Court that a fine of $25.00 each be entered mgmt against the @ditnesses Robert Owens and Thomas Freeman, This Honorable Court adjourns until Tuesday morning, November Sth,, 1923, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. é Pres Tuesday, November 6th,1923 This Honorable Court convened according to adjournmmnt,on Tuesday,November 6th, 1923. No. )- @O APPEAR AND SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. State ) The defendent appeared and showed good behavior vs and continued under former order. ) Alfred Jones No.26 State vs C.J.Doty FORGERY It appearing to the Court that the defendent is found guilty at this term for forgery in two cases #26 and #27,and for breaking jail in #14,and cheating with regard to a board bill in No.9,the sentence in aes a etc e e in the County Jail for a period o wo Yealrs,and assigned to wo roads of Iredell County. . shit haere _— ee ee eS No.9,14 & 27 BEATING BOARD BILL,JAIL BREAKING,& PORGERY. State The judgment having been pronounced in No.26.motion vs for judgment in these three several cases is continued C.J.Doty. but upon condition that he be of good behavior, and unless he is,the judgment shall be pronounced in each of these cases in the discretion of the Court a Soe t any time within No.22. State vs LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Jo.21 is moved forward and consolidated with No.22 The defendent pleads guilty in both cases. : defendent be imprisoned in the jail for a period of 10 months,and assigned to work on the public roads of Ire- dell County,for said period, ) ) Floyd rn It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the ) ) Wos.10,11 4ARCENY AND RECEIVING. )I State ) Alias Capias. vg ) ) Luke Wallace No.28 State ) LARCENY AND RECEIVING. vs ) As to the defendent,Carl anyw Carl Troutman )the Stat line cena ta tae aicene at etsteen | = ~Soligag North Carolina,and to give a $500.00 appear- Alfred pee em) Continued for the defendents Rob Troutman and Alfred routman,each to give a 3500.00 appearance bond. No.29 State vs Guy Gill ) LARCENY AND .RECEIVING ) Continued for the defendent. . a witnesses Ed Feimster and Fred Bowman are re- \ toate wu’. imprisoned in Newton. It ig ordered by the : Geant oe . capias be issued by the Sheriff of Iredell \dell at ‘ a oer to execute the same in either Ire~ Jao that then crey uty by Service on these two witnesses, )the defe ir be required to be here at the trial of lee oat ndents in No.28 and No.29. The Sheriff is required ease them as such witnesses if they give a good bond jin the sum of 3100, )witnesses Ser the ae ‘ox thetx sppamreses Het) a Continued for the State. No.30 )LARCENY AND RECEIVING. State ) The defendent comes into open Court and through vs )his coungel,pleads guilty as charged in the bill of Gus MoLelland) indictment. ) It i# ordered and adjudged by the Court that judg- )ment.be suspended upon {the payment of the costs. No.15 ) )LARCENY AND RECEIVING. State ) The defendant comes into open Court and through his vs }coungel enters a plea of guilty as charged in the bill Press Duncan )of indictment. ) It ig ordered by the Court that the defendent pay )to Robert Owens,for the pants which he lost,the sum of )Pive Dollars,and the costs to be taxed by the Clerk of )this Court. No.31 )ASSAULT ON A FEMALE. State . ) The defendent comes into open court and pleads va )guilty as charged in the bill of indictment. Charlie Watt ) It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the )defendant be confined tn the common jail of Iredell )County for a period of 6 months,and ass#gned to work jon the public roads. No.1ld. ) It is ordered by the Court that the fine which was State )entered against the State's witness,Susie Robinson for )feailing to appear when called,be struck out. vs Robert Gentle) No.15. ) LARCENY AND RECEIVING. State ) It is ordered by the Court that the fine of $25.00 each vs )which was entered against the States witnesses,Robert Press Duncan )Owens and Thomas Fresman,for failing to appear when )called,be struck out. No.13 )ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO RAPE. State ) The detendent comes. into open court and pleads vs )guilty as charged in the bitl of indictment. Robert Gentle) Motion for judgment is continued upon condition )that the defendent pay to the Clerk of the Court the }sum of $25.00 on the first of each month,until he has }paid the sum of $100.00 for the benefit of Susie Rob- )inson,and pay all costs to be taxed by the Clerk of )this Court. Probable cause being shown that Robert Troutman par- ticipated in the stealing of a vality dresser,the property of the Statesville Furniture Company,it is found that there is probable cause shown of his guilt,and he is required to give a bond in the sum of $200.00 for his appearance at the next ertminal term and he is ordered in the custody of the Sheriff for his appearance. Witnesses,for the State,C.L.Gilbert,Gus MoLelland, Frank Bridges are recognized in the sum of $100.00 each for their appearance at the next term as State's witnesses. June Troutman and W.C.Pierce,kereby acknowledge themselves in- debted to the State of North Carolina in the amount of $100.00,for their appearance here at the next term of Superior Court. REPORT OF GRAND JURY. fo the Superior Court, November Term, 1923 Iredell County. Beginning Nov.5, 10:00 a.m. Judge B.F.Long,Presiaing: We the grand jurors for November Term of Iredell Connty:S3uperior Court,1923,beg leave to submit the following report: We have passed on all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made re- turns of same to Court. We visited ths County Home by a Committee of three and there we find forty inmates as follows: 14 white women,eight white men, sight negro women and 10 negro men. We find in the insane department,l white woman,l negro woman. Four convicts,four mules, four- teen milk cowm and@ forty head of hogs. Committee talked with several inmates and they all said that their keeper,lir. & Mrs.Perry treated them kindly,that they had plenty of nourinshing food,well prepared and served to them. We find the house neatly kept,they thereby showing that the one big idea with the keeper is cleanliness of inmate and premises. schools. We had before us,Mr.J.A.Steele,County Superintendent of Schools,and he reports that all school buildings in the County under his care,conformed to the State requirements. We have five,two story build- ings that have class rooms on the second floor. In addition to first floor. Eighty,one-story buildings,all meeting ths requirements of the State. Mr.R.M.Gray,Supt,of the Statesville Schools report that they meet the State requirements. Mr.%2.V.Turlington of Mooresville,reports that the buildings there are up th the standard requirements of the séate. Court House. Inspection made by Committee. We fina all the offices are neatly Kept and records carefully filed for the convenience of those wanting to refer to same. \ie recommend that hinge on iron door to window in vault of Register of Deeds,be repaired at once,as same is unsafe as it is now. Chain Gang.We find 19 men in the chain gang camp; eight white men, eleven negro men. They all report that they are treated all right. The chain gang has thirteen mules all in g00d condition for work,with wagons, sorape plows,shovels,picks and other tools that are being used in the work. Ja@al. We also visited the jeil by a committe. We fina eight prison- ers; four white men,1 white woman,and three negro men. They report that the treatment received there was satisfactory. We make the following recommendation on jail that the top railing on stairs to second floor be put back on the banister. That the kitchen and hall or lobby,be painted so that they can be washed and kept clean. That one of the rooms for insane,be renovated and paddéd anew. We also find in the case of insane persons,who are put in jail a- waiting admittance to the hospitel for the insane,that they are placed in iron cells or rooms formerly occupied by-criminals,because there is no other place for them; we therefore,recommend tliat rooms be fitted up,one for males and one for females with toilet and heat for these unfortunates. We ask your Honor to have this recommendation carried out,as we consider this important. This Nov.6th,1925. Respectfully submitted, R.LePoston Foreman crand Jury. TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JF IREDELL COUNTY: Your attention is respectfully called to the report of the grand Jury at this Term of the Court,and to the matters therein referred to in which the grand Jury suggests the repairing of the jail and certain things to be done for the benefit of the insane wherein confined. The Court requests the Commissioners to make a critical examination of this report and see that the things therein recommended to be done to the public buildings shall be done. The report seems to be intelligent and the things recommended to be done necessary to be done. The Court directs the Clerk to copy this report,and along with it suggestions made by the Court,and to serve a copy of the report with the suggestions made by the Court to the Board of County Commissioners,to the end that these things recommended shall be done. B.eF.LO ‘Judge Presiding. Monday, Movember 21th, 1923. Second Week, Iredell Superior Court Before His Honor,B.F.Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell Gounty.| November Term,1925, Second Week. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock A.M.,Monday Morning,November 12th,1923,when and where His Honor,B.F.Long, Judge Presiding for the Fifteenth Judicial Dis- tract,North Carolina,is present and presiding,this the second week for civil cases at November Term,1923. M.P.Alexander,the High Sheriff of Iredell County,North Carolina,is present and opened Court. No.d ‘ Mrs.Louise Hayes v3 Continued Columbus Hayes No.31l Florence Bb. Ramsey, vs Continuedon account of sickness of Plaintiffs counsel James M. Ramsey No.33 L.P.Claywell vs Continued on account of sicknéss'ef Defendents counsel Smith Hallman No.73 M.H.Moknight vs Continued for the Defendent. Lee Rankin North Carolina, Iredell County. No.l W.P.MeLain and others i vs i QRDER Miller-McLain Supply Ges hig cause coming on for further hearing at this term of the Court before the undersigned Judge presiding, and the death of Dorman Thompson, Receiver of the defendent company heretofore appointed having been suggested, It is, therefore,considered,order and adjudged that John A. Seott Jr. be,and he is hereby appointed receiver of the Gefendent Company,with a ie yoke a one full authority to ast a3 Receiver. North Carolina Iredell County. | No.63 W.P.Krauss,Trading as Krauss Sanitary ns vs | JUDGMENT C.E.Ritchie ' This cause coming on to be heard at the November term of Iredell Superior Court,before his Honor,B.F.Long,Judge Presiding, and a jury,and being heard upon an inquiry before the jury and the jury having answered the issue submitted to them as follows: “In what amount is the Defendent indebted to the Plaintiff"? A. $325.92,with interest from August lst,1925 at 6%. It is thereupén considered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendent the sum of $525.92,with interest at 6% from Aug.1lst,1925,until paid. It is further ordered that the plaintiff recover of the defendent his costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court in this action. B.F.Long Judge Presiding. No.2 LeEllis Hayes,Admr.of M.I.Campbell vs Continued Columbus Campbell No.4 Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville : vs Continued tor Referee's report. De-AeBeoam & L.A.Beam No.5 Je-H.McElwee vs ; Continued Hutton & Bourbonaise No.6 A.J.-Keller etal vs i Continued. Charlie Hicks et al No.7. Royal Motor Co. ve Continued. Carl Stimson et al Nc.8 WeR.Webster & W.J. Matheson vs | Conti m J.S.Setzer _— Monday ,November 12,1923. No.9 w.C.Johnston et al) vs Continued F.H. Shoaf No.10. C.B.eStewart,Admr o Carl Stewart j vs | Continued. Miller Mfg. Co. No.12. Statesville Lbr.Co vs Continued. ReLeChurch et al Noel4 Jas.C.Davis,Director General of Railways vs Continued on account of Plaintiffs Counsel. Cleveland Mfg.Co. No.15 | Jas.C.Davis,Director General of Railways vs ‘Continued on account of sickness of Plaintif'’s Statesville Veneer Co4{counsel. No.16 J.0.-Wilcox Continued. vs Robert Daniels et al.i North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell VYotinty. November Term, 19235. Mrs.Barbara Thompson Admx. J.C. Thompson vs JUDGMENT. J.0.Ervin et al This cause coming on to be heard before hsi Honor,Judge B.F. Long and being heard,and the plaintiff,through her attorney,”%.V.Tur- lington,come into Court and move for a voluntary non-suit. It is therefore ordered ana adjudged that this action be and the same is hereby non-suited and dismissed,and that the costs be tax- ed by the Clerk of this Court against the plaintiff. B.F. Long Judge Presiding No.20. ! Jo7.Smith et al vs | Iredell Farmers I Warehouse Co. Continued. N0.2%3 L.C.Caldwell vs L.0.White | Continued for pleadings. * November 12,1923. Monday, November 12, 1924 No.25 ; Statesville Lbr.Co. . No.44 vs Continued. Barger Bros. N.G.Holmes et al | ee Cemesiank: Thomas Thompson et al No.26 Statesville Lbr. Co. i Wo.45 vs Continued. Neal-Plott Gro.Co. Dorsett Fraley et al |: vs ; Continued. ReMeHudson & Co. No.35 Noi46 Eastman Gardner Co. Thomas Hardware Co. vs Continued. vs Continued Je-C.e-Holmes Lbr.Co. : ReM.Hudson % Co. . No. 47 North grterad Mrs.M.E.Westmoreland Iredell County vs / Continued. No. 36 J.A.Westmoreland Dorman Thompson, Receiver, of Statesville Wood Pro-!' No.48 ducts Company ‘ J.A.Westmoreland vs ORDER vs Continued. 0.W7.Slane Mrs.M.E.Westmoreiand This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of Court,and the death of Dorman Thompson,Receiver of Statesville Wood Products Com- No. 49. pany, having been suggested,it is ordered that W.D.Turner,successor as Worthington Pump & Receiver of said company,be and he is hereby made party plaintiff in Machinery Corpn. saia action. vs It also appearing to the Court that I.H.Isaacs is a necessary party Statesville Cotton Oil Cao defendent in said vause,it is therefore that alias summons be issued against said Isaacs,returnable betore the Clerk of the Court within twenty days from the issuing of same. It is further ordered that the plaintiff have leave to file new NO.54 pleading and the detendents the right to file new or additional answer, Statesville Lbr. Co. if he so desires. vs |; Continued. N.GeHolmes Continued. B.F. Long Judge Presiding. No.38. No.62. J.L.Ingram J-R.Laxenby et al vs Continued. = M.V.Bartles Board of Commissioners of Iredell County. Continued. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | November Term, 1924. ae 1 Poilet C Chemical Toile O~ No.41 VB | Continued. U.S.Edwards&J.A.Eidsdn County Board of Educa- vs | tion of Iredell County. E.M.Yount This cause coming in for hearing at this te : : rm of the Court and 0-86 1} popearing that the parties have adjusted their differences,the Plain- 2 J-B.Houpe : comes into Court and takes a non-suit. It is ordered that the cost ¥e e taxed against the plaintiff and his bondsman. Della Houpe B.F.Lon Judge Pres iding Continued. No.19 Sherrill Lbr.Co.et al No.42 : bing Sawyer Bascuit Co. : | E.3.Goodin et al vs Continued. J«K.Morrison,Gro.&% Pro.Co. Monday , November 12,1923 No.72 Gertie Withers va Zellie Withers. lst. Did the Plaintiff and defendent intermarry as alleged in the complaint: Answer. Yes Dnd. Has the Plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commenoment of this action? Answer. Yes. Sra. Did the detendent commit aduitry as alleged in the com- plaint? ‘ Answer. Yes. No.72. \ North Carolina, j In the Superior Court Iredell County. d November Term,1923. Gertie Withers , vs JUDGMENT. ellie Withers. } i This cause coming to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County,and being heard before His Honor,B.F.Long, Judge Presiding,and a jury,and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court as follows, towit: lst. Did the plaintiff and defendent intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Yes. znd. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commencment of this action? Answer. Yes. Srd. Did the defendent commit adultry as alleged in the com- plaint? Answer. Yes. It is, therefore,ordere@,adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendent be, and the same are hereby disolved,and the plaintiff is granted an ab- solute divorce from the defendent. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. b.F.Long Judge Presiding. No.52 North eh nens In the Superior Court Iredell County.) November Term, 192% C.3.Wilson ) vs ) ISSUES Fannie Wilson ) To 1. Did the plaintiff and def complaint? efendent intermarry as alleged in the Ans. Yes. 2. Was the defendent at the time of the amrri ant,and was the eer ae <a of the fact of such anneunae > pregeent Be @s. 3. Was the plaintiff the father of nee of said child? 4. Was the plaifitiff airesident of North S ro immediately eo the filing of his sonsimiast Co oe ee Ans. @S. . Monday ,Nov. 12,1925. No.52 ; North Carolina, , In the Superior Court. ' Iredell County.i C.3.Wilson vs DECREE OF DIVORCE. Fannie Wilson. This cause coming for hearing before his Honor,B.F.Long, Ju€ge Presiding,and a jury,and the jury for their verdict having answered the issues submitted to them,in favor of the plaintiff,and by their verdict,they find that the defendent at the time of the marriage was pregnant,and that the plaintiff was ignorant of this fact,and that the plaintiff was not the father of the child: It is therefore considered,ordered and adjudged that the marriage between the plaintiff,C.S.Wilson,and the defendent,Fannie Wilson,be and the same is hereby dissolved,and the parties thereto divorced from the bonds of matrimony. This November 12th,1925. B.F.Long Judge Presiding. North Carolina, ,; In the Superior Court Iredell County. November Term, 1925. AL. Aldridge vs E.M.Aldridge e ' lest. Did the plaintiff and the deflendent inter-marry as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. and. Have the plaintiff ana the defendent lived separate and apart for more than five successive years prior to the commencment of this action ag alleged in the complaint and was said separation without fault of the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. 4rd. Has the plaintift been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the complaint: Ans. Yes. North Carolina, , In the Superior Court. Iredell County. / November Term, 192%. A.L. Aldridge vs JUDGMENT. E.M. Aldridge This cause coming on to be heard at this term ofthe Court be- fore His Honor,B.F.Long,Judge Presiding,and a jury,and the jury hav- ing answered the issues as follows: lst. Did the plaintiff and the defendent enter-marry as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. vnd. Have the plaintiff and the defendent lived separate and a- part for more than five successive years prior to the commenoment of this action as alleged in the complaint and was said separateion with- out fault of the plaintiff as alleged in the cemplaint? Ans. Yes. ord. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina fo: more than five years prior to the commenoment of this action as alleged in the complaint? Ans. Yes. Monday, Nov. 12, 1925. It ig therefore considered,adjudged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and defen- dent be and the same are hereby dissolved. B.F.Long Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County George Kilpatrick, )} Vs ) JUDGMENT “rma Kilpatrick ) Mh %< Aga 2am , 4013 case coming on to be heard at this term of vourt before His Honor, 5./.Long, Judge presiding the Jv : ° 8 gz Jury having answered th submitted to them as follows: r — Has the plaintiff been ea resident cf the state of North Carolina for ive ORES next rior vl t ) ¥ } ; ne commencement of th 8 & t oO Did the plaintiff and defen 3 e pl tif 4 dant intermar a ) plaint? answer, YES eee Did the defendant abendon the plaintiff and have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart for five succes aite years er eat ae commencement of this action, and that said separation a of the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Answer, 'f a a iP on age : eee ee | eh: S ordered, ad judged and decreed by the Court that Genres Kilpetrick sok the devananee ee eee hereby Wisohivaa a ga as defendant, Kmma Kilpatrick be and they are aeoaria _— ene he plaint iz ‘f George Ailpetrick is granted an ; : sVorce irom “mma xilputrick. it is further ordered that Lise J lainti a pay LOS ec xt ? ] 2 tf i t b t b t C erg of , Lt y id S OF this ac LO ’ s oe ion 0 8 axed y he 1 } B.#.Long Judge Presiding Monday ,November 12,1923 No. 28 North Carolina, ) In The Superior Court. Iredell County ) W.H. Wood ) ) vs ) ) ) Mooresville Cotton Mills,Ina. In this case the detendent after verdict,moves to set the verdict aside,for that the same is against the weight of the evi- dence,and ig not justified from the evidence. The motion is denied as to the lst issue and derendent excepts. The motion is granted as to the second ani Srd issues and the plaintiff excepts. This ruling the court makes as to all the issues in ite dis- cretion,and it orders a new trial as to the @nd and ord issues. B.F.Long Judge Both sides may appeal and serve case on appeal on each other in 40 days,from 17th of November,1925. $50.00 appeal bond adjudged suf- ficient. Long, Trial Judge North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County W.2.Krauss, Trading ) as Krauss Sanitary Co. JUDGMENT vs C.B.Ritchie ) This cause coming on to be heard at the November Term of Iredell Superior Court, before His Honor, B.F.Long, Judge presiding and a jury, and being heard upon an inquiry before the jury and the jury having answered the issue gubmitted to them as follows; In what amount is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff? 4.$325.92 with interest from Augelst,1923, at 6%." It is thereupon considered and adjudged that the plaintiff? recover of the defendant the sum of $325.92 with interest at 6% from Aug. lst,1923 until paid. ‘s It is further ordered that the plaintiff recover of the de- fendant his costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court in this action. North Carolina, ™ the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk W.P.Krauss,Trading as Krauss Sanitary Company vs , JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL ) C.E.Ritchie This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned,Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on Monday,Nov.5th,1923, and he- ing heard , and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff procured @ summons from the Superior Court of Iredell County against the de-~ fendant on the 22nd day of June,1923, and that said summons was per- gonally served on the defendant, and that thereafter, to-wit: on the day of »1923, the plaintiff filed & duly verified complaint and that the defendant has failed to file any answer raising an issue of fact, and it appearing to the Court that this is a suit upon an open account for goods sold and delivered, It is, tnerefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff have judgment against the defendant by default and that the issue of the amount be submitted to the jury for their determination. It is fur- ther ordered that the plaintiff recover its costs. J.A.Hartness Clerk Superior G@redell county zr AM North Carolina, ) ) In the Superior Court Iredell Connty ) W.P.dcLain and C.W. ) McLain and others ) va ) FINAL JUDGMENT Miller-McLain Supply Co. ) This cause coming on to be heard at the November Term,1923, bes fore His Honor, B.#.Long, resident Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District, in which Iredell County ts located, and Judge holding Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial District, upon the report of John A.Scott,dr. appointed by this Court as successor to Dorman Thompson, the deceased heceiver, and it appearing to the Court that the said Receiver has filed his final report, setting forth that 411 of the assets have been collected and the estate administered, and that a t. tal of 45% has been paid by the Receiver on the claims filed with oo and that tnere is no further funds in his hands for distribu- i0ne It is ,tnerefore, considered and adjudged that the report of the Receiver be approved and that he file the same with the pepers in tiis case, and that the said Receiver be, and he is hereby dis- charged, and it is ordered aud udjudged that the sureties upon the bond of Dorman Thompson, Receiver, be discharged from further li- ability on account of said bond. It is further ordered that the Receiver shall retain for the use and benefit of Said Receiver and his attorney, the balance of the money noW on deposit to his account as compensations for their services, the said amount being included within the comaissions el- lowed, as set out in the final report. B.F. Lon Resident Seles of Fitteenth vua- icial District,holding the Courts of the Fifteenth Judicial Dis- Nov. 14th,1922 EAC. North Caroling, In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk. WR. Kelly : vs } 2UROuEES Mox T. Payne ) This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Iredell County, and it appeuring to the Court that the summons in the above entitled action was issued on September 6th,1923, and was personally served upon the defendant on September llth, 1923, by reading the same to Max T.Payne,the defendant and leav- ing a copy with him,commanding the defendant to eppear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 17th dey of September,1923, and answer or demur the complaint filed in this case. It further appearing to the court from the duly verified com- plaint filed, that is an action upon (3) promissory notes,ex- ecuted by the defendant Max T.Payne, totalling $201.12, with in- terest at the rate of 6% on $63.62 from August 15,1920 until paid. With interest on $26.00 from July 10th,1920 until paid. It further appesring to the Court that the defendant has failed to come in and answer or demur to the complaint filed, and that more than 20 days has elapsed since the return day mentioned An the summons,and said cause being heurd on the 15th day of Oct. which was the third Monday in said month upon the verified come plaint filed inthe cause and no answer being filed. It is therefore ordered,adjydged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff W.K.xelly,is to recover of the defendant Max {.Payne the sum of $801.12, with interest at the rate of 6% on $63.32 from august 15,1920 until peid;with interest of $112.50 from May 22nd,1920 until paid; with interest on $25.00 from July 10th,1920 until paid, together with the costs of this action. J.d.Hartne erk oO @ superior Court o Iredell Co. This the 15th day of October,1922 North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk. J.B.Cooper Motor Co. -= Plaintiff vs URGMENT W.H.Cornelius -<--<--+--= Defendant T,is cause coming on to be heard, and being heard, before J.4,. Hartness, Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, on the 29th day of October,1923, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action was issued on the 12th day of Octcber,1923, and personally served on said defendant, and that the return date set forth in said summons was the 29th day of October,1923, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified complaint in said action, on the 12th day of October,1925, and that the de- fendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $248.03 and in- tere:t thereon at the rate cf six per cent per annum from the ist day of June,1922, until peid, and that said sum is due on 4 promis- sory note, being a certain and stated amount, and that the defendant nas failed and neglected to file an answer, or demur to the com- plaint: It is therefore,ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff re- cover of the defendant the sum of Two Hundred Forty Eight Dollars and three cents, and interest thereon at the rate of six percent per annum from the lst day of June,1922, until paid, and that said defendant pay the costs of this action, said costs to be taxed by the Clerk. This the Sth day of November,1923. Spe erk superior Court,iredell County sorth Carolina in the Superior Court lredell County Before the Clerk. Thomas nardware Conan +s vs ) JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT FINAL. ) ) h.M@. Hudson Company whis cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned, Clerk of the Superior court,on monday, nov.5th,1926, and being heard, and it appearing to the vourt that service of summons in this action was duly made upon the defendant on the llth day of van.1923, and that the plaintiff filed a duly verified copy of its complaint before the return date therein mentioned and that the defendant has failed to file any answer within twenty days after the return day, named in said summons and thet this is a suit upon a promissory note set out in the complaint; and it appearing by the admission of the plaintiff that the defendant has made the following payments: $427.94 ,van.24th, 1926, and $134.40 Aug.30th,1922, and is entitled to credit on the note set up in the complaint for that amount and it appearing further to the Court that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $474.59 and interest from Nov.5th,1923, and until paid, balance due on the note 4s aforesaid. It is therefore, ordered and sdjudged that the pleintiff recover of the defendant the sum cf $174.59 and interest thereon trom Nov.5th, 1923, until paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Ccurt. J-aeHartness erk Superior Cour North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk. J.0.Brookshire, vs W.L.Brown,M.K. Brown, Mason E.Brown and C.H.Brown. This céuse coming on to be heard and being heard and it appear- ing to tne court that this mutter has been settled between the plaintiff and tne defendants, by the defendants paying to tne plains tiff the amount demanded in the complaint with the principle, inter- est and the cost, it is therefore ordcred, decreed and adjudged that the said action be non-suited upon payment of said judgment, with principle,interest and the cost. This Nov.5ti,1923. J.uHartness “Clerc Superior court North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredeil County Before the Clerk Statesville Lumber Company, vs ,UI?TZ Roanoke Mills Company It appearing to the Court from the admission of the parties in the above entitled action that the plaintiff and defei dant have adjusted all matters of difference growing out of the contract set up in the complaint as a cause of action, out of court, and the defendant having paid to the plaintiff the amount agreed upon and the phaintiff having requested permission to take a volunatry non~ suit in the above entitled action, It is, therefore,considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and it is hereby non-suited and this action dismissed, It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs. Jo. Hartness erk Superior Court Nov.8th,1923, North Carolina, in the Superior vourt Iredell Comty Before the Clerk. W.A.Evans,Trading as Evans Motor Company, vs R.D.Little This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, on Monday,Nov. 5th,1923, and being heard, ent it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff procured a summons to be issued from the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the Sth day of August,1923, and that the summons was returned by the Sheriff of Iredell County endorsed "The defendant not to be found in Iredell County, said to be gut of the state,” and that service of summons in this case was had upon the defendant by publication in the Statesville Daily,as appears from the affidavit of Pegram 4.Bryant, publisher, and it appearing and being found as a fact thet the service of said summons by publication was entirely and regularly completed before the return day named in said summons and thet the plaintiff? filed a verified complaint on the 17th day of September,1923, and . it appearing to the Court that more than twenty days have elapsed ; since the said return date and that the defendant has filed no answer, raising an issue of fact, and that this is 4@ suit upon a promissory note in writing, and that at the same time, the summons was issued in the above entitled action, the plaintiff secured a warrant of Attachment against the property of the defendant, which consists of real estate in Taylorsville Township, Alexander County, and pursuant to said Writ of Attachment, the Sheriff of Alexander County , om august 6th, did levy upon the real estate of the defen- dant in Taylorsville Township, alexander County, and pursuant to said Writ cf Attachment, the same maxing return of his levy on said date to the Clerk of the Superior Court of alexander County, and also procured a Writ of Claim and Delivery for the possession of one Bethlehem Truck described in the pleading,which was seized by the Sheriff of Alexander County and delivered to the plaintiff and is now in his possession, and the plaintiff in tnis action having of- fered evidence of his indebtedness and having introduced the notes in evidence in this court. It is ,thereupon,ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $1066.99, with inter- est thereon from the 6th day of Aaugust,1922, until paid, and for the costs of this action. It is further ordered and adjudged that said amount is 4& spec- ific lien upon the Bethlehem truck described in the pleading,now in the possession of the plaintiff, and that the said truck shall be sold by the sheriff of alexander County, as in other sales of personal property under execution, and the proceeds from the sale of the truck applied to the satisfaction of this judgment. It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that the difi- ciency of said judgment is a lien from the ith day of August,1923, on the land of the defendant in Taylorsville Township,described as follows: 78 acres, more or less, of land in Taylorsville Township, Alexander County,North Carolina, and being the same land that was conveyed to R.D.Little by W.L.King and wife,by deed recorded in Book J,page 400 of the Reoord of Deeds of Alexander County, to which ref- erence is hereby made for more accurate description. Witness the hand of this court, on Monday,November 5th,1923. J.A,Hartne Clerk Superior Court Tredel. County. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk, Thursday ,Dec.20th, 1923 Commercial Credit Co., ) ve ) Judgment of voluntary non-suit M.B.Sigmon This cause coming on to be heard before J.A.Hartness,C.5.C. and the plaintiff through its counsel, J.C.Sigmon comes in Court and tekes @ voluntary non-suit: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby nonsuited and that the Court costs be taked aguinst the plaintiff. ___J.4Hartness Clerk Superior Court This Thursday, Dec. 20th,1923. Cost Paid CAAAAAECAAALAGAE CCEEHEALE GOGEECCCAAEECAREELEGE BESS North Carolina, Monday, Dec. 3, Iredell County 1923 W.W.Rankin Comoany ) vs J.B.Horton ) This cause coming on to be heard before J...Hartness ,C.5.C. and being heard and it appearing that the summons and complaint in this case having been served on J.Z.Horton on the 24th day of Oct. 1923, and no answer having been filed and the defendant J.E.Horton having replevied the property descinded in the Sher- iff's return and B.R.Rankin having signed the replevied bond. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plainiff re- cover of the defendant J.E.Horton and his bondman E.R.Rankin the sum of $139.00 with interest from the 15th day of Nov.1923, until paid at six per cent, and the cost of this action and that the property be turned over to the plaintiff to sell under the terms of this mortgage and apply the same to the payment Ja ,Hartnese SQIGMAGCEGEOCENOS of this judgment. Dec. 17th, 1923 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk Chemical Toilet Corporation ‘ vs Board of Zducation of Iredell ) County and W.D.Tpoutman ,J.T. JUDGM ) ) i 8 Z Smith and C.lM.Wagner, as the School Committee, of School District Number 4, Fallstown Township, Iredell County This cause coming on to be heard before the Clerk of the Superior Court, and it appearing to the court that the parties to this action have adjusted all mutters of difference between them and the plaintiff having come into court and requested permission to take a voluntary non-suit. It is ordered and adjudged that this action be, and the same is hereby dismissed and non-suit entered. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court in the amount of $ . J.A.Hartness ~ Clerk Superior Court CCCECCSGEE CCLaeeeaee North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County Before the Clerk, I.C Steele vs R.f.Lackey and R.S. Lackey This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the under- Signed Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on the 3rd day of December,1923, and the same being the first Monday of said month, and it appeuring to the Court that the summons in this action was duly issued on the 25th, day of Cotober,1923, and served by person- al servise on said defendants on the 29th day of October,1923, and that the plaintiff filed a verified complaint on the 7th day of November,1923, and that the return day as set forth in said summons wee on the 6th, day of November,1923, and that the said plaintif? seeks to recover a sum certain, same being due by a joint of said defendants, and that, as set forth in said verified complaint, the suid defendants ure indebted to said plain- tiff in the sum of $316.80 and interest thereon from the 2nd day of November,1923, until paid, and thet the defend- ants have failed and neglected to file an answer or demur to said complaint, and that more than twenty days have ex- pired since the return day set forth in said summons or the filing of said complaint: It is therefore ordered, decreed and sdjudged that the plaintiff, L.C.Steele, recover judgment against the defend- ants, R.¥.Lackey and &.S.lackey, for the sum of $317.80 to- gether with interest thereon at the rate of six percent per annum until paid from the 2nd day of November,1923, and that the said defendants pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this vourt. This the Sra day of December,1925. J.4-Hartness Clerk superior Court Iredell County COAEOBGE AE AEGGCECEESULE CCE SCOABERACELECAEEECESECESEGS . In the Superior Court Before the Clerk North Carolina, Iredell County H.H.Yount trading and doing business} as Yount Motor Company ) JUDGMENT vs ) J.B.Norris | This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and it appearing to the Court that the summons in this action wag issued on the 10th day of September ,1925, and personally served on said defendant on the Zlist day of September,1923, and that the return days ss set forth in said sumcons was on the 2lst. day of said month, and that this action is brought to collect an amount certain, same being due by a title note, and that the plaintiff filed a verified complaint on the 20th day of September,1925, and the defendant is indebted to the plaintirr in the sum of $245.67 and interest thereon from the 4th. day of Jugust,1925, until paid st the rate of six per cent per annun, and that more than twenty days have elapsed since the said return day or the filing of the verified complsint, and that the defend- ant has failed and refused to file an answer or demur to said com- plaint, and that this hearing now comes on to be heard on the Srd, day of December,1924, same being the first Monday of said month: It is therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plain- tiff recover judgment against said defendant for the sum of $245.67 together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per an- num from the 4th day of saugust,1922 until puid, and that the de- fendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. This becember 3rda,1923 J.i-Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County GGEECCAEGEGEEACES CGECCSGSGCEGEE