Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1918-1921 RXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT. STATE OF NORTH CaROLINa. Whereas, The uonorable 8.F.Long, assigned by law to hold the Superior ‘courts of the 14th Judicial District for the SPRING Term, 1918, and the Hon. J. L. Webb, assigned by law to hold the Superior Courts of the 15th Judicial District for said SPRING Term, 1918, have agreed to exchange the courts of the particular counties hereinafter named in their respective ‘districts for said SPRING Term, 1918: NoW THEREFORE, I, T.W.Bickett, Governor of the State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby consent to said gaenge, and do hereby authorize the said Hon.B,F,LONG to hold the said ‘Courts of the Counties Cabarrus, 2 Wks., beginning Jan.7th; Montgomery, 1 Wk. beginning Jan. 21st; Iredell, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 26th; Rowan, 2 Wks. beginning Feb. llth, 1918, in the 15th Judicial District, in Lieu of the said Hon. J.L. Webb for said SPRING Term, 1918; and the said Hon. J.L.WEBB is hereby authorized to hold the said Courts of the Counties of Mecklenburg, 2 Wks. beginning Jan.7?7th; Gaston, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 2lst; Mecklenburg, 3 Wks. beginning Feb. 4th, 1918, in the 14th District, in lieu of said Hon.B.F.LONG for said SPRING TLRM, 1918. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the ' Seal of the State to be affixed, this the thirty-firs’ in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hr” one hundred anu forty-second yea~ (OFFICIAL °° RKXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT. STATE OF NORTH CaROLINa. | wnercas, The “onorable 8. F.Long, assigned by law to hold the Superior ents of the 14th Judicial District for the SPRING Term, 1918, and the Hon. J.L, Webb, assigned by law to hold the Superior Courts of the 15th lewdteiel District for said SPRING Term, 1918, have agreed to exchange the courts of the particular counties hereinafter named in their respective districts for said SPRING Term, 1916: NOW THiREFORE, I, T.W.Bickett, Governor of the State of North Carolina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby consent to said ace, and do hereby authorize the said Hon.B.F,LONG to hold the said Courts of the Counties Cabarrus, 2 Wks., beginning Jan.7th; Montgomery, 1 Wk. beginning Jan. 21st; Iredell, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 26th; Rowan, 2 Wks. beginning Feb. llth, 1918, in the 15th Judicial District, in Lieu of the said Hon. J.L.Webb for said SPRING Term, 1918; and the said Hon. J.L.WEBB is hereby authorized to hold the said Courts of the Counties of Mecklenburg, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 7th; Gaston, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 2lst; Mecklenburg, 3 Wks. beginning Feb. 4th, 1918, in the 14th District, in lieu _of said Hon.B.F.LONG for said SPRING TERM, 1918. IN WITNESS WHLREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State to be affixed, this the thirty-first day of December in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and seventeen, and in the one hundred anu forty-second year of our American Independence. T.W. Bickett. (OFFICIAL SEAL} By the Governor: Sanford Martin, Private Secretary. RKXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT. STATE OF NORTH CaROLINa. Whereas, The onorable 8.F.Long, assigned by law to fold the Superior | courts of the 14th Judicial District for the SPRING Term, 1918, and the } Hon. J. L. Webb, assigned by law to hold the Superior Courts of the 15th judicial District for said SPRING Term, 1918, have agreed to exchange the courts of the particular counties hereinafter named in their respective | districts for said SPRING Term, 1918: | NO® THiREFORE, I, T,W.Bickett, Governor of the State of North Carolina, be virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby consent to said | exchange, and do hereby authorize the said Hon.B.F,LONG to hold the said | Courts of the Counties Cabarrus, 2 Wks., beginning Jan.7th; Montgomery, la Wk. beginning Jan. 21st; Iredell, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 26th; Rowan, 2 Wks. beginning Feb. llth, 1918, in the 15th Judicial District, in Lieu of the said Hon. J.L. Webb for said SPRING Term, 1918; and the said Hon. | J.L. WEBB is hereby authorized to hold the said Courts of the Counties of Mecklenburg, 2 Wks. beginning Jan.7th; Gaston, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 2lst; “Mecklenburg, 3 Wks. beginning Feb. 4th, 1918, in the 14th District, in lieu of said Hon.B.F.LONG for said SPRING TERM, 1916. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State to be affixed, this the thirty-first day of December in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and seventeen, and in the /one hundred anu forty-second year of our American Independence. T.W. Bickett. (OFFICIAL SEAL] ect By the Governor: sretary. STATE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA This is to certify that page (s) g 7 > GS of thi ilming 8 volume were missing or blank at the time of mi crof ° 4 RXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT. STATE OF NORTH CaAROLINa. Whereas, The uonorable 8.F.Long, assigned by law to fold the Superior courts of the 14th Judicial District for the SPRING Term, 1918, and the Hon. J.L, Webb, assigned by law to hold the Superior Courts of the 15th Judicial District for said SPRING Term, 1918, have agreed to exchange the courts of the particular counties hereinafter named in their respective | districts for said SPRING Term, 1918: NoW THEREFORE, I, T.W.Bickett, Governor of the State of North Carclina, by virtue of authority vested in me by law, do hereby consent to said | Akage. and do hereby authorize the said Hon.B,.F,LONG to hold the said ‘courts of the Counties Cabarrus, 2 Wks., beginning Jan.7th; Montgomery, ‘1 wk. beginning Jan. 21st; Iredell, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 26th; Rowan, 2 Wks. beginning Feb. llth, 1918, in the 15th Judicial District, in Lieu of the said Hon. J.L.Webb for said SPRING Term, 1918; and the said Hon. | J.L.WEBB is hereby authorized to hold the said Courts of the Counties of Mecklenburg, 2 Wks. beginning Jan.7th; Gaston, 2 Wks. beginning Jan. 2lst; Mecklenburg, 3 Wks. beginning Feb. 4th, 1918, in the 14th District, in lieu “of said Hon.B.F.LONG for said SPRING TERM, 1918. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State to be affixed, this the thirty-first day of December in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and seventeen, and in the _one hundred anu forty-second year of our American Independence. T.W. Bickett. (OFFICIAL SEAL] By the Governor: Sanford Martin, Private Secretary. MONDAY, JANUARY 28, 1918. Be it remembered that @ Superior Court begun and held in and = fortthef County of Iredell on the fifth Monday befere the first Monday in March, 1918, the same being the gsth day of January, 1918, When and where His Honor, Judge B.F. Long, is present and presiding, and Honorable Hayden Clement, Solicitor, present and prosecuting in the name of the State; M.P.Alexander, the High cheriff of Iredell County retuned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as Jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: Farl Johnson, li.C.Warcen, G.D. Ostwalt, J.M.Cass, wW.P,Morrison, E,.S. Hager, J.H. Bryant, J.B. Patterson, J.C. Smith, W. B,.McLelland, E.F.Cass, John Pharr, T.W. Vickery, R.L.Watts, D.0,Cowan,G.A, Watts, T.L. 7tikeleather, J.F. Carlton, J.F. Brawley, w.T. Keller, M.G. Sloan, kB. Young, “.A. Wagner, *,B. Brawley, Tom vanderford, Ralph Brawley, E,W, Jenkens,J.T. Ervin, C.P. Stroud, L.N.Sweet, “.L. Summers, J.A. Johnson, C.T. Elam, W.E.Webb, W.C. Lazenby and S,T.Norris. The following named Jurors could not be found: J.T. Ervin, L.N. Sweet, T.L. Summers, W.E.Webb, W.C.Lazenby. c.P,ctroud, Sick; J,A. Johnson, Sick; C.T., Blam, dead; S.T.Norris and EB. B. Young, excused. ‘The following good and lawful men were drawn as Grand Jurors for the Term: Earl Johnson, C,D.Ostwalt, H.C. "arren, J.M.Cass, W.P.Morrison, &.S. Hager, J.H. Bryant, J.D, Patterson, J.C. cmith, W.B.McLelland, E,F. Cass, John Pharr, T.¥. Vickery, R.L.Watts, Lb.0,Cowan, G.A.¥atts, T.L. Stikeleather, | J.F, Carlton. W.B,McLelland was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. C,A.Brady was sworn as officer of the Grand Jury. The following good and lawful men were sworn as Petit Jurors for the Term: J.F,Brawley, W.T.Kcller, M.G.Sloan, S.A.Wagner, S,B, Brawley, Tom Vanderford, Ralph Brawley, &k.W. Jenkens. { } | JgeNMoore [-~ere bce ade tor ia Ben LN tle. ‘ : | | no. @. ‘State | VB. J.H, Williams, Forgery. Alias Capias, J. H. Wilson No.2 State vs. W.L. Steele No.3 |State VS- MONDAY, January 29y 1916. PRETENSE. Alias Caplas. | A.W.D.W. Alias Caplas. | gush Nicholson | | | \No.4, State | VS Valter state v8. Raleigh Miller Continued. John Ab Allison No.6 State vs. Raleigh Miiler Jane Lazenby No.7 State vs. Scarla Davis | Jim McCarter No.& “tate Vs. | ia Hepler No.9 State vs. Jim Talford NGXEAXK RurxxKe xkler Max xkax Ra kmanis No. 10 State j V8 ° Burl Kestler Mageie Salmons | No.11l NState | WO. Ey Jarvis ylvester Souther 'No.12 State vs. W.H. McCarter No.13, State vs, Joe Nicholson No,1 tate. ( MURD sit. Al jas va dlas. i x Continued Under Former Order. Continuea Under Former Craer. H. « Le. Alias Caplas. J \ ive P. W. L. j { i } Mfg. Liquor. Continued Under Former Order. Retailing. continued Under Former Order. j . i Certificate of Physical Disability Filed. Continued Under Former Order. MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 1918. No.14 State v8. Robert Jones No.15. “tate vs. Will Goforth No. 16 State vs. D.V. Steele No.l‘. State VS. Thunkhill Banks ‘ilas harris No.18 State VS. Rose Knox Tom Knox Lee Knox Flla Knox No.19 State VS. Walter Gatton Minnie Pool No.20 “tate v8. Fred Caldwell No.2l rtate vs. Walter Brandon No.22 State vs. Odell Lowe | No, 24 | State vs. | Richard Falls 5 } Called and Failed. dudgamsrx { Judgment Nisi Sci Fa « Capias. } Continued Under Former Vrder. i i } Forging vheck. Alias Capias. Larceny. «alias Capias. LAXCENY, Alias Capias. alias Capias as to Walter Gatton. { xhyexex Larceny. Alias Capias. } } Called « railed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa « Capias. Judgment Absolute Upon call of this case, and defendant is again called and failed and it appearing that judgment was rendered upon defendant and bondsman, it is ordered that this case be docketed on Execution Docket for Penalty and Costs,xandxixmgukianxkaauad and this judgment certified to Davidson County and Docketed. j ) N.P.¥.L. i MONDAY, JaNUakY 28, No. 25 State vs. Roger Gaither No. 26 | State t WBe Son Day, Alias | Geo. Bennett No.27 State v8. Roby Smith No.28. State VS. R.L. Tucker No. 30 State vs. W.W. Gaither No.3]. State vs. James Carlton No.32. State vB. C.C, Harpe No.33 State vs. Joseph Harris No.34 State vs. Horace McNeely No.38 State vs. | David Duck | No.3% | VO. | Lee Bennett 1916. i i Defendant Appeared and Showed Good Behavior. Continued Under Former Order. Alias Capias. J Alias Capias. i <r Pe l i i Called « Failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa « Capias. $300 Appearance Bond Required. Called « Failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa « C&pias to issue unless he renews his bond in.sum of $200 within 30 days. Alias Capias. Called « Failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa « Caplas. $200 appearance Bond Required. Off Under Former Judgment. Called « Failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa « Capias. It is ordered that Deposit of “50 be condemned to use of School Fund. Alias Capias. 104 | MONDAY, JANUARY 28, 1918. Murder. Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior No.57 ja. W.D.W. ' Defendant Pleads Guilty. | vs i 5 State ( é G Judgment Suspended upon payment of vosts and ood | Court beginning Jan. 28th. 1918, and sitting for the { j t j 4 } vs. Leroy Moore. B tt } Behavior. i Lee Benne dispatch of business, The “rand Jury ef said court No. 43. in a body, 16 present, returned into open court, Ka XxeyxMurdack 1s A.¥.D.W. Defendants Plead Guilty. State vs. As to Murdock, Judgment suspended upon payment of Walter Murdock Harrison Turner As to Turner, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that he pay a Fine of $25.00 and 1/2 the . j Costs. | IREDELL COUNTY JAN. TERM 1918, Jan. 28th. 1918, the following bill of indictment 1/2 the costs and Good Behavior; in words and figures as follows; NORTH C..ROLINA J IN THE SUPER1OR COURT The Jurors for the “tate upon therir oath present, No. 52 That Leroy Moore late of the co State jA.W.L.W. Defendant through his attorney waives unrty of fredell on the vs. ) finding of ©ill and rleads Guilty. Leewaugh Johnson { / the county aforesaid feloniougly, wilfully , and of his 17th. day of Jan. 1918, with force and arms, at and in No. 42. malice aforthought, did kill and State Defendants plead guilty of forcible trespass. r murder Lum Millsaps The defendants being at the bar of the Court contrary te ‘the feem ef the statute in such case made Howard Morefield Sears Seeee ceunsel, Turner and Bristol, tender Lester Hunter to the Solicitor a plea of guilty of forcible and provided , and against Bud Hayes trespass ( The bill of inditment being changed to 4 . gainst the peace and dignity of the Gaither Hayes charge of forcible trespass) which pleas the State. Solicitor for the State accepts, whereupon it is considered and ddjudged by the Court that each of ie ee eae , the defendants pay a fine of $20.00 and one fourth of the cost. A TRUE BILL. vs. No. 54 Defendants plead guilty of forcible trespass. W.B. McLelland State er this case, in consideration of the good characters | . vs of the defendants’ fathers and the fact that the defend- Howard Morefield ants themselves have shown that they have heretofore ; TORN OF Swans Jury. Lester Hunter becn boys of good character, the motion for judgment Bud Hayes is continued upon condition that they be of good be- State Gaither Hayes. havior and that they show to the court at the an. [ae vs \ Criminal term 1919 of Iredell “uperior court, that they have been of good behavior, and to this end they are Leroy Moore required to give bond in the sum of $200. each to make theri appearence at the said term and show Peur good f Bi > By order of the Yourt, the defendant, Leroy Moore, in the i j behavior; also upon condition that each one urth of t) t } { j { j custody of the High “heriff, was brought into open court being represented by counsel, Lewis and Lewis, was the cost in this case. er eee The “olicitor for the State, Hom Hayden Clement, having Ko. 48. Defendant called and failed, whereupon it is ajudged State that the State recover nisi against the defendant and vs. his bonsmen, J. F. Lowe. Raymond “haw. called upon the prisoner to stand and hold up his right hand, and having made known to him that he stood charged by the name of Leroy Moore in the indictment read to him Ne 40 Defendant pleads guity of Larcen | y» It is ajudged by % State the court that the defendant be condined nas sandal vs. Jail of Iredel count for a period of six months, and Son Day. assigned to work on the Public roads of said county ae \ es said period. ° . W. De. W. Plea Not guilty. The Jury being sworn and State { empanelled for their verdict say they Find ane Defendant vs. guilty of attempted assault and battery as charged in Will Hoits claw bill of indictment. It ajudged by the court that the | } defendant pay a fine of $5.00 and the cost of this actiag 'No.39 wee hie n attndance upon th Jan. | State Centinued for the befendant. : . © court. » Tuseday Hemee: ry vs John Mcdaniels | the Prisoner plead Not Guilty and for his trial placed himself upon God and his Vountry. The Prisoner being at the bar, it is ordered by the court that the High Sheriff of Iredel County summons 25 good and lawful men who are free holders to appear at 29th. 1918, at 10 o'clock, A, M. and not depart the court without leave The Prisoner was then remanded to Prison to await the orders of the court. “38 Henorab i918 at 10 a. 106 | TUESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1918. This Honorable Court meets according to adjomwnnment at 10 o'clock, A.M., Tuesday WV January 29, 1918. No. 58. State vs. J.H. Ludwig. No.4’. State vs. Henry Wood. No. 36. State VS. Will Holland No.35 State vs. John Henry Long No.41 State vs. John Henry Long | No. 45. | State _yvs. 'Nelson Simonton | | | ruEsDAY, JANUARY 29, i | Nos. 50 « 57 ng | State | VB. | Loyd Haves John Sloan L. « R. Upon call of this case the charge ischanged to } forcible trespass. Upon Bhan charge counsel for the defendant waived bill and pleads guilty of forcible trespass as to personal property, but not oe 66 as to the real property. baer es Upon motion of the Solicitor Judgment is | suspended upon the payment of the costs. This F eons vides Judgment is without prejudice to either of the parties | onn in Civil Suit. | { Lee R. Defendant Pleads Guilty. } It is adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay { a fine of $20.00 and the costs of this action. No. 46. State , Vs. Hub Moore ) Permitting Chickens to Run At Large. Appeal from { Justice of the Peace. Plea Not Guilty. ; Jury No.1 being sworn and empanneled for their Veruict say they find the defendant Guilty. fo.S2 State V8. Leroy Moore {Larceny. Plea Not Guilty. )The following Jurors: P.M.Raymer, J.I.Thomas, J.A. } Lippard, F.T. burke, R.¥.P,u, R.L.Cloaninger, WLC. Perry, T.D.Snuford, J.W.Fowler, R8.S.Sherrill, 5.L. Tomlin, J.A.Gibson, being sworn and empanneled for their verdict say they find the defendant Guilty. it is adjudged by the Court that the defendant be | imprisoned in the County Jail for Fourteen Months and assigned to work at the County Home of tredell County. Also ordered that if he fail to stay in the Custody of the Superintendent of the Home that the Clerk may issue Capias for him anywhere in the State. Larceny. Plea Not Guilty. Jury returns same verdict as in Case No. 35. The Court gaving pronounced judgment in case 55 a.ainst Defendant, the motion for judzment is con- tinued upon conuition that the defendant comply with the gmmdkkkam order made in 35 and that he otherwise be good behavior, otherwise the Court reserves the power in its discretion to pro- nounce judgment in this case at any time within Four years. J} c.C.W. Plea Guilty. . 3% oe ad judged by the court that the defendant } pay a Fine of $De. 00 and the costs of this action. 30 j } f i A.W.D.W. Plea Not Guilty. The Jury being sworn and empanneled for their verdict say they find the defendants guilty. Bigamy. Defendant Pleads Guilty. It is adjudged by the Court confined in the common jail ofmIredell County for a term of Six Months and assigned to work on the public roacs of said County during saia term of imprisonment. that the defendant be Jail breaking. Plea Guilty. Senbenee is that he be imprisoned in the vounty Jail for 14 Months and assigned to work at the County Hiome of iredell County. Also ordered that if he fail to stay in custody of the ‘mper- intendent of g& the Home that the Ulerk may issue Capias for him anywhere in the State. Murder. Before this case was called for trial, the Court waited for several hours for the purpose of ob- taining a few jurors of the regular panel to ve first tendered to the prisoner, but all the Jurors of the regular panel have been engaged from about 9:30 o'clock on this day until the call of this case at eight minutes to three o'clook without having rendered a verdict in the case they have been empanneled to try, and the Court having before had a venire regularly summoned, allows the case to go to trial, and before doing so the prisoner is warned as to his rights as to the special venire. Pending the selection of the jury in this case the jury referred to as being out came into vourt and rendered a verdict in the case in which they were empanneled to try, whereupon the seven regular jurors on the said panel are now tendered the pris- oner and the State for the completion of the jury after the prisoner has been warned as to his rights as to the regular gurg panel. Pending the selection of the jury the defendant used eight preemptory challenges and the State one, after which the jury was selected under the panel, as follows, to-wit: W.H. Cornelius, T.&k, Ervig J.A.Gibson, #.T.Burke, J,1.Thomas, R.L. Cloaninger, J.C.Privett, S.J.,Hollanc, R.W. Pou, J.B, Cooper, J.F.8rawley, , Ralph Brawley. Upon the close of the evidence in the case, counsel | for the prisoner tendered to the State a plea of Guilty of Murder in the Second Degree, which plea the Solicitor for the State, with the privilege of the Court,accepts. Whereupon, it is considered and adjudged by the Vourt that the prisoner be imprisoned in the State's Prison for a term of Twenty-five Years at hard labor. It is ordered by the Court that Furches Raymer be paid .50¢ out of th ‘ ® Vounty funds for drawing the Jurors in the Moore Vase. This ionorable court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, January » at lo O'clock, A.M. rae (“hich to ensieproredemuy order othery . by default 4 . Henry Wood, Before judgment is pronounced in this case No. a ates we states that the defendant is suffering from mens? the dete hysical disabilitiée; The Court refers these matters to be pass- agony ihe county phgsician, Dr, McElwee, who is requested to report 3 Nias of this prisoner to the Board of County Commissioners to ca that they may take such action with regard to the prisoner as + el may see proper pending his sentence, : Sentence of the Court is that he be imprisoned in the county jail for twenty month with leave to the County Commissioners, after consulting wih he county physician, to assign him to work either at the county home or . the reads, as they may see prpper, i Nog 50. State Vs. Eaves & Sloan. Fine of #20, and costs of 1/2 each, $ . No. 64. Nol prossed with leave as to James Stimson, No. 66. Suggestion is made that the defendant, John Young, is under vhy~ sical digability. This matter is referred to the co unty physican, No. 52. State Vs. James Stimson. Fine of $20 ana costs, No. 61. Nol prossed with leave as to L, Arner. As to the defendant, Rand Grigfin and J.B. Shank, defendants Plead guilt ty of forcible tresnass, Upon motion of the solicitor the judgment is suspended vpon payment of the costs and goof behavior. No. 49, State Vs. Houston Davidson, Solicitor takes verdict of not guilty. No. 60. Daisy Steele, The defendant is called and friled, si capias, No . 59, Caipas * Tudement ni No. 57, Not guilty, No. 62, State Vs..Guy Brown and T.D, Shuford, Surety, Upon the call of this case the solicitor wes fo It appears to the Court that at the previous term was called out and forfeited his bond, surety. Judgment absolute was against Shuford is restored to is shown strikes out the rced to teke a nol pros, the defendant, Guy Brown, the defendant, shuford being his rendered against Shuford for $100, This case the docket and the Court because satisfection judgment absolute and modifies the same so that the State now recovers the judgment absolute arcainst Guy Brown and his surety, Shuford, in the sum of $100., for which judgment is remitted to the costs of the sci fe, and the cost of the original case of the Stete Vs. Guy Rrown nol prossed at thés term which, when paia by Shuford shall be his discharge, No. 65. Nol prossed with leave, No. 2, Judgment absolute, According to the terms of the sect fe No, 2 fe docket, judgment is remitte > sei d to the costs of the sci fe, No. 37, Judgment sus pended on the payment of the cests in this case and of the cost of No.2 scl fe docket, Upon the Call of the gs of + ba ae eg Plaintiffs abe allowed 30 days from the expiration of the term in 9 fale Complaints, and defendants are allorea 60 days thereafter in as of this term except ins ise is Specially made, S taken for cause in op North Carolina | Tredel) County ummons docket at this term, unon motion of a member uch cases wherein some and except in those cases wherein fudgment. en court, J.B, | inees et al, Pitts, i . ! In the Superior PPer Caudle Creek Drainage System. } Court, January Term, 1918 1 for Iredell County, i complaint filed Superior Court of, Iredell County. Vs. sage Commissioner ee aaa Caudle Creek Drainage System ° ! filed with the int in the Craven case was ears that the compla an ‘ a 24th of January, 1918, and thet the eee in rt eng : wanada et al, against the defendant was filed on the 1‘ ° ov- case of Sigmon, 5 ember, 1917. term of Court the counsel for the defendant for each of these eevee ‘anh the two cases be consolidated, It avnears to the Court that oa ae has not filed an answer in either one of the cases, so that the defen he defendant may wish to 8 7e before it such facts as t en cee a acs, tunetae, holds thet the motion is premature snd that set for e af} C ’ t t not intelligently pass upon the record until the record is comnlete, 4t cannec 3 ° - 5 The motion, however, of the defendant to consolidate the two vegies is ‘ , : e cr tered on the record and continued without predudice, to be passe? unon entere Y wnen the pleadingd are all in. The defendant also moves that in the latter case, Craven os pis of Drainage Commissioners, etc., that J.B, Sigmon, o.M. Rhinehart, ps 7 Rutledge, trading as Sigmon, Rhtnehart & Rutledge, be made parties de _ ant in this latter case, to wit: the Craven case, zr the same reason th motion is also continued until the defense is set forth therein and ansrer. ed or a demurer. No. 50, State Vs, John Sloan, The judgment heretofore rendered in this case is stricken out, and it is ordered that the defendant be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of seven months, with leave to the County Commis- sioners to hire him out to Mr. J. A. Collins, provided the said Collins, be- fore taking the prisoner, pays into court $20. fine and one-half the costs, Whereupon, by consent of the Board of County Commissioners he is hired to the said Collind during the term of his imprisonment, It is further ordered thet if he escapes during this term a capias be issued for him, No. 50. State Vs. Loyd Eaves, The judement heretofore rendered in this case is stricken out, and in lieu thereof he is imprisoned in the county jail for eight months with leave to the County Commissioners to hire him out, on condition that he first pay to the Clerk #20, and one-half the coste in this case. When such is done the County Commissioners may hire him out to a good man during his sentence; and if he escapes may issue a capias for his arrest. At the conclusion of the criminal docket formed thet the members of the bar prior to t greed among themselves to continue the civ ordered by the Court that the sheriff send personal notice to @ach and everyone of the jurors, summoned On the panel fior the second week of the Court not to attend at this term, at this term, the Court is in- he sitting of this Court a- 11 trial docket, whereunén, it is) No. 36. State Vs, Will Holland: When this case was called the defend had been issued, fioundec of 1911. ant was tried upon a warrant that | upon Chapter 590, Sections I, and II. in the Laws | The case ha been tried in the Court of a Justice of the Peace, the de- fendant convicted, and the defendant appealed to the Superior Court, Refore the jury was impaneled, the defendant's counsel moved to quash the warrant and to dismiss the action, because the warrent charged that the defendant allowed his chickens to unlawfully run at large in Olin township; the de- fendant also moved that D.C. Rhyne be marked prosecutor and taxed with the costs. The Court reserved the question lowed the jury to pass upon the fact jury returned a verdict of euilty, aid of the counsel 1009, applied to Olin township in Ired tion there was a certificate of Hon, presented by these S, and after eo The Court then two motions and a}- nsidering the case tre took up the question, bY Act, Chapter 590 , nays of 1911, Page 611 County, Bearing upon this ques-~ J. Bryan Grimes, Secretary of State,in|- evidence, which certificate recited w ord for word the 90 Laws of 1911, except the certificate Cet eipiialhe did not state what 1 | states, namely: that the Act tras rati of managieane ae vo so sbates, "Amend by adding after the word, 'tormship' — ee cc I. the words ‘Olin Township', Adopted January 31st,. a "2.0. Cobb, Principal Clerk, Adopted March 8th,, 1911," ‘The Secre- : ‘a State also certifies that the word "Olive Township" were inserted peed and ink evidently, as he says, in the enrolling office for the — So embodying in said bill the two amendments appearing on vage2, Tae not state this as a fact, but seems to think thet his was what was oT I find as a fact from the records offe ed before me that the bill, Chapter 590, was ratified on the 6th day of March, 1911, and that the amenda- ment with regard to Olin Township was adopted March 8th.,, 1911, two days after the Act itself had been ratified, the Act making it unlawful for chfe}-- ens to run at large, etc. in Olive township, not Olin Township, Tredell County. That there was no evidence offered thet there was any fraud with regard to the passage of the Act. There was no evidence offered as to whether the Acts had been signed by the presiding officers of the Senate and House, but the Court is left to presume and assume that the bill, Chan- ter 590, was enacted and agreebly to the terms of the Act regularly rati- fied the 6th day of March, 1911, amending the said Chapter 590 or in any wise altering it. The Court has not been able to find that since the sit- ting of the Legislature in 1911 that the two subsequent sessions of the Legislature, since the passage of Chapter 590, has changed or modified or altered Section I of Chapter 590, Laws of 1911, vage 1009, the error, if there was an error, There is no contention made before the Court or evidence offered tending to show that the two presiding officers didn't sign the Act, Chapter 590, Lans of 1911, in the regular way, nor any evidence tending to show that the Act was not ratified, as it purports to have been, on the 6th, of March 1911, nor any explanation as to whether an amendment (if there was an amendment on the 8th, of March, 1911)was not embodied in some separate Act, as it seems to have been two days after tre ratification of the Act. Nor is there any proof that there was any fraud, or any adequate proof of an erroneous enrollment before the Act was passed, so as to correct The Court, therefore, orders that the mott the warrant be granted and the v fendant is discharged, on of the defendent to quash erdict is set aside as annulity and the de- With regard to the motion made to mark D.C, him with the costs of this proceeding, the Court is unable to find that he has prosecuted the action maliciously, and disallows defendant's motion to tax Rhyne with the costs up to the present time, But the said Rhyne, be- ing present.in court st the time of the motion, and the Court having heard all the evidence in this case decides that it is not a case involving the publig interests justifying its further prosecution, and it 1s ordered to be marked prosecutor as to any proceeding hereafter in this actidn; ana is required to pay any costs, if cast in the Suit, for the reason that the Court does not think the public interests require a further Prosecution of this action, Rhyne prosecutor and tax North Carolina, 4 In the Superior Court, Iredell County, 4 January Term, 1918, ‘S.J. Holland 4} Vs, ) JUDGMENT Romas Reid j This cause coming on to be the Superior Court of Iredell Count B.F, Long, Judge Presiding, and it has the property in his possession, by summoms and Claim and Delivery in duly fitted his complaint within the and that the defendant has failed to Court, heard, and being heard at this term of Y, and being heard before his Honor, appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and that the defendant was duly served this Cause, end that the Plaintiff has first three days of thid Term of Court file ancanswer at this Term of the eo it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Plaintiff is entitled! Sto dy and possession of the mule and that he sell said cribed in the personal prop » at the Court House door in States, ording to law, and pay the costs ofl @ complaint » and the surplus, if any proceeds of sale of Said Property, BLE. Judge Presiding, } In the Superior Court, North Carolina January Term, 1918, ty. Tredell Coun D. © J. Holland, Assignee of C. Weve Moore and J.A, Thomas, and JUDGMENT individually. Vs. M. Jane Sowers. " *t, f the Superior Court, ause coming on to be heard at this ace appearing that the This ca nor, B.F. Lomg, Judge Presiding, an the plaintiff in the sev- before his - ° . Sowers, is justly indebted al the legal rate of interest defendant, Oe eee upon in the complaint, — sana Manuel bavind eres et ekitinies by Promissery Hetée, and de said action, It is orhe mee nis and answer the verified complain a recover of the @¢fend- — "laieead and adjudged that S.J, Hollan from December 11th S vers vn . C > r 1918; for the sun of $450.09 with interest from “2ora, Wei6; for the sen of 1915; for “7 it} st from September 23rd, 1 ; 6 su! ~1380,94 with interes $933 75, the Doe ube: Gan erees from December 21st 1916; = SR ERS6.00 sate hee pra ree from Janucry 19th 1917; for the on or ran bee Ww Sees a 7; for the sum of | ° oe 28th, 1915; for the sum of $ . 7 21st, 1916: for the sum ’ of $845.95 with interest from October Ne a as £305.90 sf tieD 00 with interest from April 2lst, 1917; for the si ne Sahni, from July 6th, 1917, which specific lien on the lands mortg complaint. . ppo inte It is further ordered thet R.B. McLauchin be and ha nee ce Commissioner to sell said lands and that he sell the nie jae Phil atta. the highest bidder at the court-house door of sa C : oe i aut wives tising the Some for thirty davs in some newspaper published | . ver o +15 * ~~ en bs wail 60 nty, and tha’ he sell the same for One-third cash, one-third - { salc oun x & 4 ca ++ « = . 4 Ule thres and one-third in six months time, the proceeds to be eae q Jati n of the indebtedness for which gaia lands were cin, tea = ip i og of this action, and in the event that advance bids, = Sie euthhe COsus Of lan at hs id Commissioner is L “hind wiet ays after such sale, sa ale are fthled within 20 days ; . t ob- ined to pe-sell said lands on the terms hereinbefore directed withou id ty . nd the rt such sales to sa taining further orders of the Court, and that he report Court. It is further ordered that th to bid and become a purchaser of an said sums are hereby declared a aged to secure the same as set forth in the @ plaintiff be and is hereby permitted y of said lands at such sale, It is further considered and adjudged that the plaintiff seth dor ont vy 3 : a ’ the 1 : anb the sum of $40.00 with interest thereon from Decenber 1017. with the costs of this action, to bo taxed by the Clerk, ii ~ > s BF Long oo Judge Presiding North Carolina, J} In the Superior Court Iredell County. { January Term, 1918, R.V. Brawley, Administrator of J.J. Brawley, deceased, Vv JUDGMRE a 8S. R.W. Orr and MF, Orr This cause coming on to be Superior Court of Iredel Siding, and it appearing have compromised their dé heard, and being heard at this Term of the 1 County, before his Honor, B.F. Long, Judge Pre-~ to the Court that the Plaintiff ana defendants fferences, and that the casts of the action have been paid, and that the Plaintirr has a take a voluntary non-suit: It is, therefore, ordered and be, and is hereby non-suited &reed to adjudged by » and this cause is hereby dismissed, BB. Long the Court that the plaintiff North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1918, Liber$y Hosiery Manuf acturing Company, a corporation ied wis . Vs. Tuscaloosa Mills This cause coming on to be Superior Court of Iredell Count siding, and it appearang to the discharged the debt sued upon b it. is, therefore, ordered by non-suited, and that the att ty of the defendant be, and the It is further ordered that the plaintiff, heard at the January Term, 1918, of the Y, before his Honor, B, FP, Long, Court that the defendant has pa y the plaintirr. B.F. Long Judge Presiding North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1918, Tom Cloaninger and Knox Sigmon partners, trading and doing business under the firm nama and style of Cloaninger & Sigmon JUDGMEN® Vs, LE. Hedrick This cause Coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, B.F, Long, Judge Presiding; and it appearing to the Court that this is an” action to recover » Secured by by Chattle Mortrare wherein deferidant he sum of Four Hundred Dollars, on or before Decemp » With interest from September 26th, 1916, And it further a action was duly issued served on the term of court; was fiked before the comme appearing that at bhe and procured a Writ of erty conveyed ih the B5Ge, executed by defen to secure the payment note aforesaid, which property is mentioned and in Plaintiffs verified Complaint; and it further appearing that Was seized by the Sheriff of Iredell County replevy the Same it was duly delivered to advertising the Samé, as provided by law ana Chattle Mort &8ge aforesaid A.J, Cleoaninger be price of $100.00, and it further 1 payments made by him, & sum of money due and it further dent to Plaintiffs proceeds arising from the sale of the aforpsaia, the de +@ndant is Still due Two Hundred and Ninety ana no/100 po} tember 26th 1916 it 1@ th adjudged that bhe sale of the property 411 res (we also recommend that this be Miscell- aneous. State of North Carolina. January Term 1918, Iredell County. January 29th, 1918. To the Honorable B.F, Long, Presiding:- We, the Grand Jury, respectfully report that we have diligently and carefully examined into and passed on all the Bills that have come be. fore our body, and have examined all the witnesses in each case that were available, These bills have been returned inte the Court by tre Foreman, We have inquired of each member of the Grand Jury and we know of no viola- tions of law we have to present, outside of those that have been pursed up- on by US. Under the orders of the Court, and in accordance with the law, we have, by a Committee, visited the County Home, and beg leave to report that we find there fortyone ( 41 ) inmates, composed as follows: 14 white fe- males, 7 white males, 9 colored females, 8 colored males, and 3 convicts, Upon investigation and upon questioning the seve’al inmates, we found that all of them are well provided for, and they state that they are well fed comfortably clothed, and that they are wéll looked after by the Keener, The buildings are well-kept, cleon and orderly, and are, apparently, in a good and sanitery condition. "“e are gratified and pleased to report no illness of a serious nature. By 2 committee, also, we have visited the Chain Gang, and found eight prisoners, 6 colored and 2 white,- all males, They wererall at the camp when our committee arrived, and upon investigation and interrogation they each reported that they had no complaint whatever to make of their treatment; that they were well provided for, with good and substancial food and clothing, and that their treatment was all that sont ke desi a. 0 committee was particularly impressed with the eisai tasks of the a fan and of the tent in which they are housed, We found the sanita oer of the camp in as good condition cs the circumstance mould ai. camp has eip 2 d mu n p ight gooc les, in splendid condition, and sufficient and nec essary Wagons and other equipment for use 7 v US@, We visited the County Jail, be in fairly good conditio rood ¢ on, but we recommend th amined and repaired. nc 4 mme hat the padded cells be ex- » aS in their present condit 1s } y nor } : ~ . a 1 ' arse Rave fo reg wnat the lights on the senend ficas pr sofictant ‘oe POmmend 1a he lighting sy a : - ; ~ system on this “ ae We find also that several of oe _. ieee al ° he cells have been removed, makince the cell inseou ion I re, that this be put in a good and ; “ — 5 secure conditio Ss of prisoners committed to same, Several of the nella east ne per ieis i ae G@ repainting, and given attention, in a body, and found the building to window of one and we recommend We have also visite Court, Sheriff, Register of ‘ Tre the offices of the Clerk of the report that we f } » ov easurer and Superinte He that in i ote oe sede nice, clean mei Senticnall easel Saaieechene int - - € books were kept in good co VW ory condition, ine. having ve a secure steel containers provid ndition, and valuable 39 ng cently undergone oa complete 1 , tare ad ae ee and wood-work repainted, we Veena, and commend the Commiss in a body, rt the building in g00d condition, & given this their attention, Respectfully submitted, Wf. McLellana, Foreman of Grand Jury. M4 Cag Hh the walls re-kalsomined | North Ceroling, | In the Superior Court, Iredell Count? . | January Term, 1918. N.D. Tomlin, B.F.Russell, et al, aUS= Iredell Hardware Company. This cause coming on for further consideration: It 1s ordered, considered and am@judged that the Receivers of the defendant Company give notice to all creditors by publication for three weeks in the Statesville Landmark, to present their claims duly verified on or before the lst day of March, 1918, to the Receivers at their office in Statesville, otherwise they will not be permitted to participate in the distribution of the funds of said estate. B.F. Long Judge Presiding. | Menday, May 20, 1918. Be it remembered that a Superier Ceurt begun and held in and fer the Ceunty ef iredell en the kleventh Menday after the first Vendayi in Warch, 1918, the same being the 2Cth day ef Nay, 1918, when and where his ener, Jadge J.L.Webb, is present and presiding and Hen. Gay@ en Clement, Seliciter present and presecuting in the name ef the State; vw, PpALlexanuer, High Sheriff ef tredell Ceunty returned inte epen Ceurt the names ef the fellewing gered aid lawful men te served as Jurers fer the First week ef this Term: J.H.Tharpe, T.M.Stikeleather, J.S.Frye, J.C. Jeyner, T.F.Walils, J.W.Mills, 0.I.Nixen, D.N.McLelland, J.F.rharr, W.W.Rupard, L.H.Hebbs, B,E.Aery,l.o-McAuley, ¥.M.Harris, H.}l. Jehnsen, J.W. Vickery, N.D. Payne, G.S.Martin, J.N.C.Martin, Lem Wallace, T.A.Jenes, L.A.Cherry, J.A. Padgett, F.B.Sample, J-hn A.Clark, J.M,Lipe, J.L.Reid, D.M.Templeten, ¥.S.Flewers, W.H.Clark, N.L-vradferd, W.Ress Mills, 5.S.Nenny, WoH. Hunter, ".S.Clendenin, W.L.Lewtharpe, The fellewing named Jurers are marked, "Net te be Feund": R.A.McAuley, J.N.C.Martin, Lem Yallace , C.A, Padgett, Jehn A.Clark, W.S.Flewers, sick, N.L.Bradferd. The fellewing geed and lawful men were drawn as Grand Jurers fer the Term: W.S.Clendenen, J.H.Tharpe, J.W.Mills, J.C,Jeyner, W.L, Lewtharpe, N.D.Payne, W.H.Clark, T.S.Walls,J,S.Frye, J.M.Lipe, S.S.Denny, L.H.Hebbs, “.Ress Mills, W.W.Rupard, J.W.Vickery, J.L.Reid, D.M. Templeten, B.+.Aery. w.S.Clendenin was swern as Fereman ef the (‘rand Jury. C.A.Brady was sween as Officer ef the Grand Jury. The fellewing geed and lswful men were swern as Petit Jurers: W.H.Hunter, D.N.McLelland, ™.M.Stikeleather, J-C.Thempsen, J.A.Bradferd, F.H.Geedin, J.S.Merrisen, b-\i-Masen, J.H.Treutman, J.F. Raymer, A.b. Parker, H.L.Gilbert, The fellewing Jurers were ex used fer the Term: G.S.Martin, H.N, Jehnsen, ''.A. Jenes, T.I.Nixen. Ne.l- State vs. Fergery. Alias Capias. J.H.Williams mr Alias J.H.Wilsen Ne.2/ State va. W.LSteele In the Army. Off. Ne.3. State vs. Rush Nichelsen Alias Capias. MONDAY, MAY 20, 1918. MONDAY, MAY 20, 1918. Ne.4 State { Ne.18 wk. { Alias Capias. State f Valter Sheek i _ VB. j Alias Capias. ‘alter Gatten { Vinnie Peel Ne. 5. State i | vs. { Ceninued. Ne.19. 2aleigh Miller, } State i | Abe Allisen \ vs. { Alias Capias. Fred Caldwell 1@ eve Mate \ - VS. { Alias Capias. Ne.ZcO Raleigh Miller State : Jane Lazenby j v8. ; } Called « Failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa &« Uaoias. ‘alter Branden i N e f { 1 ° State Ne.cl. vs. } Ce:ntinued Under Fermer Cruer. State i ; Scarla Davis { v8. i Alias Capias. Jim McCarter Carter Reddick j Ne.8 1 Ne.2c. State i Centinued Under Fermer Order. “tate j ve. \ vs. i Appeared and Shewed Geed HKehavier and that “d Hegler Reger Caither j he is supperting his wife. Centinued Under Fermer Cruer. Ne. 9 State f vs. { Alias Capias. Ne.c3. Jim Talferd. \ State { Vs. f{ Alias Capias. Sam Brewn, Alias, } Ne.ll Gee. Kennett | State i _ V8. { Centinued Under Fermer Order. ",H.McCarter } Ne.24. State { vs. j Alias Capias. Ne.13 Raleigh Smith } State i vs. { xlias Capias. Rebert Jenes i Ne.25 State { _ VBe f Alias Capias. Ne. 14. ?.L. Tucker \ ~~ Callea and railed. Judgment Nasi Sci Will Geferth \ Fa « Capias. Ne. 26. State { vs. { Centinued. Ne.15. ‘att Kerr 1 State ) _ v8. { Alias Capias. bD.V. Steele } Ne.2e, State { . v8. { Alias Capias. Ne.16. James Carlten { a State \ v8. / ‘ Alias Capias. Thunkhill Banks i Ne.29 Silas Harris 4 State { vs . Alia as. Ne.1lv. C. 0. tarps lias Capias State 1 | vs. 1 Resa Knex, { Ne.30, Tem Knex, i Ali: a. State tee Knex, } as Capias. vs. ! Called Fs 42. d *, d r mn Flla Knex. \ Herace McNeely i x Failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa « Vapias. ’ Ne.32, | State i | vs. deny Revel. N.P.W.L. MONDaY, MnaY 20, 1918. Ne.335. State vs. Raymond Shaw. Ne.35. State V8. . Nal Snerrill Quincy ~“eaceck Ne.41l. tate V8. Hub Yerk No.10. State vs. Lee Havrxss Jarvis ‘ylvester Seuther KeBx xXx MeREXKizyakseRX e.12 State vs. Jee Nich lsen Ne. 36. State vs. G&, \aruses. Ne. 46. State vs. J-A~Gai ther Ne.’50. State vs. Hal Reseman Ne. 5l. State vs. G.Dewitt Naulden. re.3%. State vs. Daisy Steele Called Failed. Juagment Kisi Sei Fa and Ca .ias. Centinued. Called « Failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa ana Uapias. Appearea and Shewed Gsea vehavir. Discharged. Ao eared and Shewed Ceeua rehavier. “charged. -a.Critcher, State witness in this Case, Jalled Sailed. Judgment, Nisi ‘ci_ a %« apias. Fine ©10.00. 2% @fani 7 etc ba. f Cane n.N.D.W. Defendant threugn his ceunsel, i.f.Grier, waives finding ef Bill and pleads Guilty. it is erdered by tne Ceurt that the Lefendant, J.A.Gaither, pay a fine ef 5.00 and cest. ef this actien. Disturbing Religieus ‘ership. Defendant by Ceunsel pleads Guilty. BIGAN I. Defendant Pleads Guilty. it is erdered by the Ceurt that the defendant be cenfined in the State Peniten- tiary fer a term ef Twe “ears. A.w.D.W. Defendant threugh Ceunsel, L.U.Caldwell, pleads Guilty. Judgment suspended upen the pa,/ment Cests. MONDAY, MAY 20, 1918. Ne. 45. State v8. Bud Villsaps Ne.44 State vs. Harvey Lee Heusten Hub McLelland Ke. 53. “tate vs. ink Rinehart. he. 31 34 State vs. Jehn ‘cDaniels a Nes. 38 « 39 State, vs. Jas. , Brown, x Ne. 40 tate vs. Gee. Dulin. Ne. 52, State vs, Cee, Dewitt 4ncthe. < Abandening Children, Defendant pleads Guilty. prayer centinued. it is erdered by the Ceurt that defendant give benac in sum ef Fifty Dellars te appear at each Tcrm ef the Ceurt fer ighteen Venths and abice the erders ef the Ceurt and pay the cests ef this actien. Prayer fer Judgment, Larceny. Centinued as te Heusten. Defendant, Hub McLelland, pleads net Guilty. The Ceurt finds the defendant, Hub NcL lland, Net Guilty. barceny « A.'.i.%. Censelidated by censent. -lea net Guilty. . he Jury being swern ane empannelled fer their Verdict say they find the defendant guilty fA.W.D.%. but net guilty ef Larceny. \ Larceny. Eill changed te ercible ‘respass. Defendant pleaus euilty ef fercible ‘respass. irayer fer Jua;ment centi ued. Lefendant put in custedy ef “ill Leng until the further erders ef the Ceurt er until a suitable iieme can be getten fer him. Tee l’uch “niskey. Plea Net Guilty. The Jury being svee7n and empannéled fer their verdict say they find the defendant Jee ccles Net Guilty. Centinuecd by censent,. Centinued by Censent. False “retense. Centinued. Embezzlement. Defendant "leads Guilty. Judgment Suspended. MONDAY, RAY 20, 1918. Ne. 49. MURDER, State i Be it remembered that at this Term ef the vs. ‘ Superier Ceurt beginning May <0, 1916, and laura Jane “tevensen } sitting fer the Dispatch ef business, the Grand Jury ef said Ceurt in a sedy, 1& present, returned inte epen Ceurt, May 20, 1916, the follewing bill ef indictment in werds and figures as follews: NILORTH CAROLINA? f In the Superier Ceurt, LREDELL coUnTY. j JaNUARY TERM, 1918, he Jurers fer the State upn their eath present,fPhat Laura Jane Stevensen late ef the Ceunty ef itredell en the First day ef April in the year ef eur Lerd 1918, with ferce and arms at and in the County afere- said felenieusly, willfully and ef his malace aferetheught did kill and murder her unnamed infant child centrary te h the ferm ef the Statute in such case made and previded and against the peace anu dignity ef the “tate. Slement, Seliciter. A TRU: BILL, ¥.S. Clendenin, FORLMAN OF CRAND JURY. Ne. 4c, R,V, Brawley, «s.mr. J.J,Brawley , Decd. vs. Lrrer. Off at .danaary ‘erm, R.W.Orr and M.F.Orr 1918. Ne.59 C.T.Deal, vs. Drs. h.~k.Little L. V.Cleaninger fentinued. Ne. 34. T.E.Miller vs. Hardaway Centractin Cea, Centinued,. MONDAY, MAY 20, 1916. Ne.60 A. Karuses, v8. Centinued. c.A.Critcher, and wife, Pyunice Critcher Ne. ll J.C. Reseman vs. orrer. Off U,I. 3eseman Ne.13. Dr. J. J.Mott vs. Centinuea by Jensent. R. .Flamigan Ne.19. Mesresville Furniture Ce., VE6 alias Summens. ¥,S,Satterfield. N.D,Temlin, et al. vs. Open fer Order. tredell ‘iardware Cempany Ne. 36 U.B,Davis, vs. L.H.Melcher . mabe Centinued fer Defendant. J€0.4.,'Orrew, Thirty days allewed fer filing cemplaints and thirty days thereafter fer filing Answers. This Henerable Ceurt takes a recess until Tuesday Merning,» May igtme -O Ketn = a. 7} A ee JUDGE PRESIDING. £1,1918, at 9:30 A.M MONDAY, RAY 20, 1918. Ne. 49. State v8. Laura Jane “tevensen Ne. 4c. R,V. Brawley, amr. J.J,Brawley vs. R,W,.Orr and V.F.Orr Ne.59 C.T.beal, vs. Drs. K.E.Little « L. V.Cleaninger Ne.34. tT, E.Miiier vs. Hardaway Centractin Ce. af MURDER. Be it remembered that at this Term ef the Superier Ceurt beginning May 20, 1918, and sitting fer the Dispatch ef business, the Grand Jury ef said Ceurt in a Bedy, 1&8 present, returned inte epen Ceurt, May 2c, 1918, the follewing bill ef indictment in werds and figures as follews: NMORTH CAROLINA? { In the Superier Ceurt, LREDELL COUNTY. } JANUARY T2RM, 1918, "he Jurers fer the State upn their eath present, phat Laura Jane Ctevensen late ef the Ceunty ef iredell en the First day ef April in the year ef eur Lerd 1918, with ferce and arms at and in the Ceunty afere- said felenieusly, willfully and ef his malace aferetheught did kill and murder her unnamed infant child centrary te h the ferm ef the Statute in such case made and previded and against the peace anu dignity ef the State. Clement, Seliciter. A TRUE BILL, ¥,S,Clendenin, FOREMAN OF CRAND JURY. » Decd. \ } kbrrer. Off at -danaary Term, { 1918. { cCentinued. | | i 1 Centinued. } \ MONDAY, MAY 20, 1916. Ne.60 A, Karuses, v8. c.A.Critcher, and wife, mynice Critcher Ne.1ll J,C,.Reseman vs. U, I. Reseman Ne.13. Dr.J.J.Mott vs. R, .Flamigan Ne.19. Meeresville Furniture Ce., Vs. ¥.S.Satterfield. Ne. 53s N.D.Temlin, et al. vs. lredell ‘iardware Cempany Ne. 36 C.B.Davis, vs. L.H.Melcher Cee.A.orrew. sr i : 4 ee ee Centinued. orrer. Off Centinuea by Censent. Alias Summens. Open fer Order. Centinued fer Defendant. ™ . Thirty days allewed fer filing cemplaints and thirty days thereafter fer filing Answers. This 21,1918, at 9:30 A.M, Henerable Ceurt takes a recess until Tuesday Merning, May wi PyeeZ JUDGE PRESIDING. po ¢ 5 ee ee Sees pqpene eae meee THIS HONORABLE COURT met according to adjourment at 9:50, A. M., Tuesday, May 21, 1918, No.27 State -VS- Ww. W. Gaither No 58. State -VSe Thos.Bass No 60. State -VS= Thos.Bass No 58. State -VSe Pink Rhinehart No 49. State -VS= Laura Jane Stevenson No 44, State -VSe Harvey Lee Houston No 58. State -VS= Waldon Parks No 56. State -VSe Clete Patterson No 43, State -VS= Lester Flow No 55. State -VS- Clarence King No 47. State Guy Bradshaw No 48, State eVS- Allen west No $2. State Hal Roseman Fales pretense-- Bill changed by consent to an assault, Deft. pleads guilty through counsel to an assault. Judgment of the Court, that judgment be suspended on payment of costs, Retailing. | Defendant pleads guilty. Judgment of the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and costs, Having liquor for sale. Defendant plead guilty. Prayer for judgment | continued, Deft. to give bond in the sum of $100.00,to apper at each term of court for 2 | years and show that he has not dealt in liquor | or sol@lit, and abide the further orders of the Court, costs to be paid at this term, A. W. D. We. and Larceny, consolidated with No.54 by consent, Guilty as to 53 not guilty | as to 58 . Judgment of the court that the Deft, be confined in common jail of the county for | a term of 4 months, with leave to commissioners to work at county home. Murder. Deft. pleads not guilty of murder as charged in the bill of inditement,but pleads gfity of manslaughter through her counsel ,Stéte accepts. Judgment of the court that the defendant be cone fined in State Penitentiary at hard labor for a term of 5 years. Larceny. Continued. Larceny. s Defendant pead guilty. Judgment of the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County | for a term 5 months , with leave to the Coms. | to work at the county home or hire him out. Rape, Defendant pleads guilty to simple assault through his counsel, Prayer for judgment suspended on the payment of the costs including Jail fees. Assault on a female, Deft.plead not guilty Jury No.l Verdictguilty. Judgment of the court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of 6 months with leave to Coms.to work at County Home, Cruelty to animals, Not guilty. Enticing labor out of the State Deft. called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias to be stricken out if Deft.files bond in 15 days. Assault on wife, Not a true bill, Disturbing Worship, Judgment of ° the court that a fine of $50.00 ana wa taxed wi Statesville, N. Cc, May 21,1918, The Grand Jury for May Term, 1918, of Iredell County, Superior Court, begs leave to submit the following sient: We visited the County Home in a body and found 45 inmates, 21 white, 15 females and 6 males, and 24 colored, 12 males and 12 females. We found the home in excelent condition and the inmates well cared for. We ecommend that a ee say walk be laid from the main building to the dining room, also that a porch be built 18 X 10 on both sides of cement walk, We inspected ths Court House and found the same in good condition, We visited the County Tail in a body and found 8 prisoners, two white, one male and one female and six colored, five males and one female, We reccommend that the two padded cells be repaired, also a broken window, We further recommend that certain parts of the jail be thomougly cleaned. We found the prisoners well fed and taken care of, Respectifully submitted, W. S. Clendenin, Foreman, This Honorable court takes adjournment until Mondey, May @7th,1918, 9.50 A.M. FSG hen se ee | CIVIL DOCKET. | NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. MONDAY , MAY 27, 1918. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10 o'clock, A.M. Monday, May 27, 1918. M.P.Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as Jurors for the Second Week of this Term: J.H.Brown, A.L.Warren, J.A.Yates, T.R.Renegar, C.F.Lackey, C.E.Sides, D.H.Powell, Wm.Rupard, Jas. L.Turner, K.k.Morrison, R.C.Morrison, W.A.Watts, W.S.Brawley, T.M.Warren, C.S.Johnston, D.F.Jenkins, C.T.Wall$, P.C.Fletcher, T.A.Rumple, J.B.Waugh, Jas. H.Mayhew, C.L.Millsaps; C.A.Thomas, C.S.Fox. J.u.Brown lives outside of the County; T.R.Renegar and P.C.Fletcher are sick. The following Jurors being farmers were excused for the Term: D.H.Powell,ii.S.Brawley and Jas. H.Mayhew. No.12. Morganton Gro Co. 5 vs. CONTINUED. E.Morrison. j No.14 Kate B.Patterson & -usband, VSe Statesville Air Line K.R.Co. CONTINUED. a RE No.15. Zeke McDaniels, VBe , Vernice McDaniels. CONTINUED. No.18. J.Dixon Crucible ‘o., vs. i CONTINUED. R.P.Allison. | No.24. | S.M.Goodman, | vs. F.H.Wallace. : | No.28. | E.Morrison, { vs. t Carolina Motor Co., & t A.L.Barringer mAaie CONTINUED. No.55. Statesville Lumber Co., V8. CONTINUED , John E.Patton & D.W.Adams No. H.W,Scott, Trustee of Frick | Co. i . vs. j L.W.Powell, H.L.Norman, JW. | Poweit. Clas Beith ile is MONDAY, MAY 27, 1918. No.39 W.S.Brown, i VSe S.B.Harris CONTINUED. No.435- J.B.Glover, and Wife] VSe i Western Union Telegrhpy Coe CONTINUED. | No.5l. Jesse Brawley VS. | CONTINUED. / Lola Brawley No.54. M.M.Early VS: J.P.L ttle & Henkle Live Stock Co. CONTINUED. No.55. Sigmon, Rhinehart & Rutlege VS. Upper Coddle Creek Drainage District. CONTINUED. No.57 The R.&.R. Mfge Coc VBe S.R.Brown & Son. CONTINUED. No.58. Miss J.0.Sherrill V8. C.A-Dulin CONTINUED. No.16. ~T = S Gosdinen i _ WB. i ISSUES. W.R.Allison : The Jury being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the following issue: Is the Defendant indebted to the PYaintiff and if so in what amount? "No Nothing." F | No.44 _F.L.Sharpe & S.T.Norris, | i _ partners, i JUDGMENT. { i vs. Bloomfiald Mfg. Co., Inc. _ This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, and it appearing that the parties have compromised their controversy on the following aan Defendant to pay Plaintiffs the sum of Sixty dollars and the It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff's recover of the defendant the sum of Sixty Dollars and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. . Jas. L.Webdb. No.2] E.L.Fleming & T.N. MOR LNeS; ° ee 128 | MONDAY, MAY 27, 1918. E.L.Fleming & T.N.McElwee, 5 V8. S.0.Riley { ISSUES. The Jury being sworn and empanneled for their verdict say they find the following issues: lst. Did the Plaintiffs endorse a $500.00 note for the use and benefit s alleged in the complaint? of the defendant a gz jac ond. Is the Defendant indebted to the Plaintiffs on said $500.00 note, and if so, in what amount? 3rd. Is the Defendant indebted to the Plaintiffs on open account, and i@ so in what amount? Answer: $572.80. No.2l. E.L.Fleming&® T.N.McElwee, { By leave of the Court, plaintiffs VS. { withdraw from their complaint filed S.0.Riley. { in this case, all allegations of Fraud and only ask Judgment ageinst Defendant for amount claimed in Complaint. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday, May 28, 1918 at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. JUDGE PRESIDING. Answer: ,$500.00 with interest from Feby. 24th, 1916, and Company This Honorable Court meets according to adjourment Tuesday May ,2@na 9:30 08,A. M. 19g/%> North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. May Term, 1918, E. L. Fleming and T. N. McElwee, pertners trading under the firm Warehouse JUDGMENT, -VS= 4 I name and style of McElwee's Plantes j t } t tf { S, 0. Riley This cause coming on to be heard at the may Term, 1918, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, James L. Webb, Judge Presiding,and a jury,and being heard,the jury having answered the issues as apperar in the records; It aa oer enere » ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffsrecover of the defendant the sum of $1,072.80 with interest on $500.00 from the 24th day of January, 1916, until paid, and with interest on $572.80 from the 20th day of May, 1918,until paid, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, JaseL. Webb, Judge Presiding, No.23, P, RP Handcock, -VS« Candis Hancock, CONTINUED, No. 25. C. M. Shook, #VS< Carolina Motor Co, CONTINUED, No..26;, 4 J. L. Cowan Assignee , is, § of Geo. C. Moore and Company Motion to dismiss by Deft.counsel’ J. W. Brown and Geo,CiMoore & | : q over ruled by the Court, J. C, SherrillPartners trading trading as Geo.C.Moore &Co, The Jury being sworn and empannel&dd for their verdict say they find the following issue: : Are the defendant endorsers indebted to the plaintiff and if so in what amount? Answer Indebted to amount of face value of note with interest added, The amount arrising from sale of Mule in question to be deducted, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, May Term, 1918, J. L. Cowan, Assignee of Geo,CMooie \ Jas.W. Brown, Geo.C,Moore and J.‘C, Sherrill ,partners trading as Geo.Cc. | and Copnay. i This cuse coming on to be heard at the May,Term, 1h. puberior Court of Iredell County, vefore His Honor James L, We ord; so mage the issue as appears in the record é ie : ¥ eA Alb oaths aN ii tea 2 129 130 It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, Geo.C, Moore and J, C, Sherrill, the sum of Two Hundred and twenty five and 84/100 $225.84) dollars together with interest on said sum at the rate of 6% per annum from the 2lst day of May, 1917, until paid, and for the costs of this action,to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, James L, Webb, Judge Presiding, No. 76. ‘ H. L. Kincaid Exr.of] F, M, Kineaid, 4 ISy.E Ss . “VS- 7 Lelia Kincaid et al, The Jiry being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the following issues: lst. Did testatrix by the words "House and Lot to Thomas Lee" intend to devise her dwelling house in the City of Statesville, on Davie Avenue to Thomas Lee Kincaid, as alleged in the seventh peragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes. @nd.Did the téstatrix by the becuest of 1:000.in Turner Mill, 1,000.in Paola Mill, 1,000, in Statesville Furniture Co. to Irvin,intend to bequeath to William Irvin Steele $1,000.00 in stock in the Turner Mills Coe; $1,000. in stock in the Paola Cotton Mills,Inc, and $1,000, in stock in the Statesville Furniture Company,as alleged in the eighth paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 3rd, Did testatrix by the mords "Joe Kincaid 500,00 in Turner Mill" intend to will J. J. Kincaid $500.00 in stock in the Turner Mills Co., as alledged in the ninth paragraph of said complaint? Answer Yes 4th. Did taetatrix by the words in said will "Jim K, 500.00 Flour Mills" mean and intend to willto J-mes B, Kincaid $500.00 in stock in Steré ling Mills,Inc.of Statesville, N, C, as alleged in the tenth paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, Sth, Did the testatrixby the words in said will "Neely K. 500.00 | in Turner Mill if he comes back from war if not to "Lee"intend to will to Neely K. Kincaid $500.00 in stock in the Turner Mills Compamy on co-=- dition that he survive the present war, he being a soldier'in the American army, and ifhe fail to return hereafter,then the said $500.00 in stock in the Turner Mills Co,,to go to H.Lee Kincaid,as alleged in the llth paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, . 6th. Did the testatrix by the words "Walter Knox 500,00 Turner Mill" intend to will to Walter Knox $500.00 in stock in the Turner Mills Company,as alleged in the 11-1/2 paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 7th Did the testatrix by the words in said will "Barium Springs 500.00 in Turner Mill" intend to will to the Regents of the orphans ‘Home of the Presbyterian Church of the State of North Carolina $500.00 in the Turner Mills Company,as alleged in the twelfth paragraph of the Complaint? Answer Yes, Sth, Did the testabrix by the words in said will “Annie Louise Thompson 500,00 in Flour Mill" intend to bequeath to said Annie Louise Thompson $500.00 in stock in the Sterling Mills,Inc. of Statesville,My Cf as alleged in paragraph 15th paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 131 9th, Did the testatrix by the words in said wil] "Hs 500.00in Flour Mill" intend to will to Hannah Steele $500 00 1n stock in the Sterling Mills,Inc., of Statesville, N, C,,as alleged in fourteen paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 10th, Did the testatrix by the words in said will"Annie Foard 100, in Paola Mill" intend to will to Annie Foard $100.00 in stock in the Paola Cotton Mills, Inc.,a corporation of Statesville, N, C.,as alleged in the 18th paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, llth, Did the testatrix by the words in said will "Maggie Thompson 100,00 in Paola Mill" intend to bequeath to Maggie Thompson $100.00 in stock inxthe Paola Catton Milla, Inc.,a corporation of Statesville,N.C., as alleged in 16th paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 12th, Did the testatrix by the words in said will “Kate Knox 100.0 in Paola Mill" intend to bequeath to said Katé Knox $100.00 in stock in the Paola Cotton Mills in Statesville, N, C, ,as alleged in the 17th paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 13th. Did the testatrix by the words in said will “Laura Bost 100.00 in Paola Mill" intend to will to said Laura Bost $100.00 in stock in the Paola Cotton Mills,Inc., of Statesville, N.C., as alleged inthe 18th paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 14th, Did the testatrix by the words in said will "The rest to Lelia and her children" intend to bequeath to Lelia Kincaid, a sister, and her children the residue of her estate,as allered in the 19th*para- graph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 15th, Did the testatrix by the words in said will "My dimond ring to Catherine" intend to will her diamond ring to Catherine Kincaid, as alleged in the 20th parggraph of the complaint? Answer. Yes, 16th.Did the testatrix by the words in said will "Dimond pin and other rings to Sarah" intend to will her diamond pin and other rings to Sarah Lee Kincaid,as alleged in the 2lst paragraph of the complaint? Answer Yes. 17th. Did the testatrix by the words in said will "My watch to Thomas Lee" intend to bequea th her watch to Thomas Lee Kincaid,as alleged in the 22h parggraph of the complaint? Answer Yes, 18th. Did the testatrix by the words in said will "Cameo pin to Lelia" intend to bequeath herheameo pin to Lelia Kincaid,as alleged in paragraph 23 Of the complaint? . Answer yes{ 19th.Did the testatrix by the words in said will "My silver and china to Catherine and Sarah" intend to will and bequeath her silver and chinaware to Caterine Kincaid and Sarah Lee Kincaid,as alleged in paragraph 24 of the complaint? Answer Yes, 20th, Did the tectarix by the words in said will "Want Lelia and her children to have all my personal things and want Lelia to have anything in my house she wants and the rest to Irvin” intend to will and bequeath to Lelia Kincaid and her children all her personal effects. thet Lelia might desire, and such as she did not desire were to go to William Irvin Steele, as alleged in the 25th paragraph of the complaint? Answer : Yes, : *mhomes 2lst.Did the testatrix the words in said_will Th | watch to Thomas toe it Neely Sr Lanes pack from war” intend to will i i tch of her husband W. T, Kincaid to Neel Kincaid,and if he felled to return from the war then to Thomas ide kines d,ag s"aiiezed in paragraph 26 of the complaint? Answer Yes, | NOrth Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1918, H. L. Kincaid, Executor of | F. M. Kincaid, JUDGMENT, Lelia Kincaid;and others. 4 7 This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor ,James L, Webb,Judge, and a jury, and the jury having for their returned the issues submitted to them, twenty one in number, in the affirmative,and in favor of the contention of the plaintiff as to the construction of the will of F. M. Kincaid: It is, therefore,considered,ordered and adjudged that F, M, Kincaid, the testatrix, bequeathed to Irvin Steele, $1000.00 stock in the Turner Mills Co; 1000.00 in the Baola Mills, Incorporated; and 1000.00 in the Statesville Furniture Co., and to Joe J Kincaid $500.00 stock in the Turner Mills Co., to James B, Kincaid $500.00 stock in the Sterling Mills Co., to Thomas Lee Kincaid, her house and lot in the Gity of Statesville, on Davie Ave,, to Neely K. Kincaid $500.00 stock in the Turner Mills Co., on condition that he survive the present world war,but if he fail to return then the daid $500.00 stock in the Turner Mills Co. to go to H. Lee Kincaid, to Walter Knox $500.00 stock in the Turner Mills Co., to Regents of the Barium Orphans Home $500.00 stock in the Turner Mills Co., | | to Annie Louise Thompson $500.00 stock in the Sterling Mills Co., | to Hannsh Steele $500.00 stook in the Sterling Mills Co., to Annie Foard $100.00 stock in the Paola Mills, to Maggie Thompson $100.00 stock in the Paola Mills, to Katie Knox $100.00 stock in the Paola Mills, to Laura Bost $100.00 stock in, the Paola Mills , to Lelia Kincaid and her children the residue, to Katherine Kincaid, her diamond ring, to . Sarah Lee Kincaid, her diamond pin and other rings, to Thomas Lee Kincaid, her watch, to Lelia Kincaid, her Cameo pin, to Katherine and Sarah Kincais, her silver and china, to Lelia Kincaid and her children all of her household and personal effects as Lelia Kincaid desire, and such as she does not desire to William Irvin Steele, Neely K, Kincaid Thomas Kincaid's watch, and if he fails +o return from the war, then the said watch to go to Thomas Lee Kinceid: | that the purpose and intent of the said F, M, Kincaid in the dis- trobution of her property was as is set forth in the plaintiff's complaint, and in the issues answered by the jury,and as declared in this judgement of the Court, Let the costs of the action be taxed against the plaintiff including $15.00 to Dorman Thompson Gurd. ,atl litem. James L, Webb, Judge Presiding, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1918, A. S. Alley,and others, -vVs- ,unee@ a ae sé James W. Brown, It appearing to the Court that since the issuing of the Summons and the filing of the complaint in the above entitled action, that James Y,. Brown has been adiudsed a bankrupt by the District Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina, and that H. P. Grier and W. D. Turner have been duly appointed Receiver of Said Bankrupt,- It is, therefore , ordered and adjudged that the said action abate, and that the costs in this action shall be subject to the orders of the Bankrupcy Court. James L, Webb, Judge Presiding, North Carolina, { In the Superior Court, | Iredell Counby, } May Term, 1918, Young j | -VS-= Young jf ISSUES. The Jury being sworn and empannelled for their verdict Say they find the following issues: -First- Did plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes 1 ~Second- Did the defendant comit adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. - Third- Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State for more than two years next oeeenere, in oO of the cemiete in this ae. . North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1918, John Young -VS-= Mamie Belt Young JUDGMENT, This cause comimg on to be heard at this Term of the Court before His Honor Webb, Judge, amd a Jury, upon the whole record, and being heard and the jury having answered all the issues in favor of the plaintiff: It is thxerefore ,upon motion of Caldwell & Caldwell, counsel for the plaintiff, considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff be free from any and all liability because of the relations here- tofore existing between himself and the defendant, James L, Webb Judge Presiding. North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ) May Term, 1918, Statesville Flour Mills Company ) -VS- ) JUDGMENT. J. M. Middlecoff ) This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 918, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, beters His Honor, James L, Webb, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Gert that the matter in contraversy have been settled between the parties; It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the pleintiff be ahd it is hereby nonsuited and it is further ordered that the costs of this action be taxed against the plaintiff. James L, Webb, age Presiding. ° North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, May Term, 1918, { 4 : Mrs..M. L. Stroud, | { JUDGMENT, G. T. White, t It apperaing to the Court in this action that the parties thereto have compromised their differences: It is, therefore ,considered and adjudged that the costs of the action be taxed against the defendant, G. T, White, Jas, L, Webb, dudge Presiding, j 135 North Carolina In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term, 1918, Frank D. Moses and others -Vs- Final Decree, Statesville Gas Company,Inc,. This cause coming on to be heard at May Term, 1918, of the Superior Court of Iredell County,before His Honor, James’L,. Webb, Judge Presiding, upon the final report filed by Dorman Thompson, Receiver in the cause, and it appearing to the Court that said report was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court more than ten days prior to this term, and that noexceptions have been filed to said report, and it appearing to the Court that said re- ceiver has disbursed the funds in his hands to the holders of the bonds of said Company with the exception of the amount due on certain bonds set out and enumérated in said report, which bonds have never been filed with said Receiver as ordered by the Court; and it appear- ing further to the Gourt that after the order of disbursement was made that the Receiver prevailed upon the State of North Caroléna to remit a franchise tax of forty dollars which had been ordered paid as a prefered claim; and it appearing further that by reason of the fact that this cause has been held open for the purpose of allowing bond holders to present their bonds, and during this period the Re- ceiver has paid out in premiums for his bond and in postage and sten- ographérs fees, an amount in excess of said forty dollars, and that said Receiver asks that said forty dollars be allowed to him as a partial reimbursement for said expenditures; and it appearing further that said Receiver asks that he be allowed to pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Tredell County the sum of $591.54, same being the amount due the holders of the bonds not yet presented, said sum to be held by said Clerk and disbursed by said Clerk to the said holders when said bonds are presented; Now therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the report of said Receiver be and the same is hereby in all respects confirmed, and said Receiver is ordered and instructe to pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County the said @ sum of $591.54, said sum to be held by said Clerk to the holders of the bonds set out and enumerated in daid report, It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that Dorman Thompson, Receiver, be allowed the said forty dollars shown by said report to be in hands, to reimburse said Receiver for necessary expenses incurred as such Receiver, It is further ordered that upon the payment of said sum g of $591.54 into the hands of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, that the bond of said Receiver be discharged and the surety on said bond be released from any further liability thereon, Jas, L. webb, Judge Presiding, North Carolina i In the Superior Court, Iredell County t { t May Term, 1918, W. C. Yates JUDGMENT, Locke McKnight It appering to the Court that the Judgment of this Court heretofore rendered in the above cause has heen affirmed by the Supreme Court, _It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court upon motion of Caldwell’& Caldwell, that the said Judgment of the Court be and the same is hereby affirmed, and the plaintiff recover of the de- fendant, Locke McKnight , the amount rendered against him, with inter- est from daid former Judgment until paid and costs of action, Jas, L, Webb, ‘ Judge Presiding. North Carolina, { In the Superior Court, Iredell County. j Mey Term, 1918, W. Crawford, E, M, Crawford and John L. Milholland, partners, trading and doing business under 28EURSN T. | the firm name and style of W. te Crawford and Company, -Vs- A. S. McKay, | The Jury being sworn and empannelled for their verdict | say they find the following issues: lst. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiffs and if so in what amount? Answer: $ 247.35, with interest from Dec.1st1914,, North Carolina , | { Iredell County. 4 In the Superior Court, May Term, 1918, W. be Crawford, E. M, Crawford and John L. Milholland,partners, trading and doing business under JSUDGMENT., the firm name and style of W. Be Crawford and Company: -VSe A. S. McKay, fhis cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1918, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, James L. Webb,Judge Presiding, and a jury and being heard and the jury having answered the issue submitted to them as appears in the record; It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum of $247.35 and interest at the rate of six percent per annum from the lst day of December ,1914, until paid,and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of thip Court, James L, Webb, Judge Presiding. Anderson Dulin Vandell Co., | -VS- { John Mack & Son, This Cause compromised between the Perties,Deft.to pay the costs, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | May Term, 1918, First National Bank, Statesville, N. C. -vs- Statesville Plaster & SUDGHER TT. Cement Co., J. B. Foster] W. L. iiihaek nce. toutes! and Dr. F.L.Sharpe. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the ; Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, James L, wevd, Judge Presiding , and being heard upon the verified complaint of the plaintiff, and the defendants having failed to appear and answep, f7 and it appering that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Twenty-five hundred dollars, with six per cent interest thereon from September 20th, 1917 , evidenced by note: It is, therefore , considered and adjudged that the plaintif recover of the defendants the sum of Twenty-five hundred dollars, with interest thereon at 6% from the 20th, day of September, 1917, until paid, together with the costs of action to be taxed by the Clerk, James L, Webb, Judge Presiding, No.58 { It is ordered by the Court, that the sentence State { heretofore imposed in this cause be stricken out -VS- j{ and the following order made instead thereof to-wh' Walden Parks { Prayer for judgments prayer contiued and it appery | ing to the Court, that the defendant is recistered for the army,and failed to report when called and the authorites are wanting him,it is therefore ordered that he be turned over to the authorities, to be dealt with as they may direct, It is ordered by the Court that Mrs. F. A. Carpenter,be allowed the sum of $20.00 for ten days services as court Stenog~ rapher, and that the Commissioner givem and order on County Treasure for same, It is the order df the Court, that Billie Alexander’ be paid $1.00 for drawing the jury at January Term of court, and $1.00 for the present term of Court, No, 26. J. L. Cowan, -Vs- J. W. Brown,etal, Motion for new trial for error apperaing in the record and in the Judges charge, Motion overruled, Exception by the de- fendant, Judgment for the plaintiff, Exception by defendant, and appealed to the Supreme Court, notice of appeal waved,bond in the sum of $30.00 adjudged sufficient. By consent sixty days allowed defendantto make out case in appeal and serve on the plaintiff, and sixty days thereafterto serve counter case and file Exception. ‘we Jas, L, Webb, 139 | ey 73 No. 43. It is ordered by the Court that the sentance hereto- No.75 « ' State fore imposed in this case,be stricken out and the followin J. La i CONTINUED, : -vs ' snserted to-wit; It is ordered by theCourt that the defenday H. 0. Thompson § Lester Flow, be imprisoned in the common jail of the county for a term 9 + six months, and be assigned to work on the public roads dur No.74. } term of imprisonment, : American Mills Co., CONTINUED. -vVs- ) No.6l. t L. H. Reavis, { | \| Oscar M. Craven i NI —vs- i No. 75. i Board of Commissioners of |] 6 Kyles by his next | \) upper Coddle Creek Drainage j friend, j CONTINUED. JO] District . -VS- { 4 ms, y The defendant demured to plaintiffs complaint in writing, oo Ny and coming on to be herrd, and after hearing the arguments, the Court Noo27e { ; sustaines the demurer and plaintiff excepts and appeals to the supreme ] E, L. Cornelius j CONTIUED, Court, notice of appeal waved, appeal bond adjudged to be in the sum of -VSs- t $25.00 the summons, complaint and written demurer constitute the case on Imp.Ord, Heptasoph { appeal. i No.39. t E. L. Johnson CONTINUED, 4 No. 23. { -vVSs- { J. A. Galiher, { Consolidated Eng.Co., }§ -vs- i CONTINUED, P, H. Lazenby, j No.20. q 1 J. W. Bost { CONTINUED, ' . No.32. { -vs- { Jas, Armstrong { Imp Ord. Heptasoph { -vs- { CONTINUED, Emma Armstrong \ ; No.29. } J. A. Craven q CONRINUED. No.4% . ; t -Vs- { B. A. Troutman & L. I. *routman, } Imp. Ord, Heptasoph { partners, trading under’ the firm } and style Mooresville Fur. Co., | CONTINUED, No.50. | -va~- D. H. Brawley { CONTINUED. J. O. D. Sohlen, -VSs- § Imp. Ord, Heptasoph j No. 50, j : i J. A. Davidson, j No.3l,. { -VS-. { W. R. Allison § CONTINUED, Diamond Fur. Co., t CONTINUED, -vs- § Imp. Ord, Heptasoph jf | No.62 t 4 No.40, } | R. S. Sherrill, C¢ovtet ee BP . C. W. Stimson t CONTINUED. -VS- } -VS- t Sou.R.R. Co., 4 Imp.Ord, Heptasoph { No.65. No.68,. } E. Morrison CONTINUED, N. H., Marsh { CONTINUED -Vs- -vVs- W. C,. Alexander § Imp,Ord. Heptasoph No. 64, } : f ; No.70,. { | Plora Lewis, | CONTINUED, W. A. Evins j CONTINUED, i -VS-=- é 4 -VS— Western Union Tel.Co., 4 a L. C, Caldwell : No.65,. t GO. DB. Miler, ; This Honerable Court adjournes Sine Die, yeh CONTINUED, Cc. L. Cruse, No.66, W. D. Troutman, 3 CONTINUED, -VSq Mrs.M, E. Westmoreland, No.69. Lewis Campbell -VS- RowanCowan No.71, W. C. Yates. Sere 2. Lowery Monday, July 29th, 1918. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County of Iredell on the 5th Monday before the first Monday in September, 1918, the same being the 29th day of July, 19 18, when and where His Honor, Judge B,F. Long, is present and present and presiding and Hon. Hayden Clement, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M.P. Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as Jurors for the First week of this Term: The following good and lawful men were drawn and sworn as Grand Jurors for the Term: A.H. Adkins, T,E. Winecoff, C.M. Bess, J.N. Thomas, L.A. Anderson, J.H. Bass, J.F. Wiggins, J.W. Atwell, J.C, Fletcher, R.S.Godfrey, J.L. Harris, C.M. Inglebert, W.L. Poston, N.A, Eidson, F.A, Dunlap, Levi Trivett, F.M, Sale, R.W. Church. a J.L. Harris is sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. C.A. Brady is sworn as Officer of the Grand Jury. It is ordered by the Court that Billie Alexander be paid fifty cents for drawing the Grand Jury. The following good and lawful men were sworn as Petit Jurors for the Term: A.M. Turner, L.S. Waugh, C.F. Patterson, J,%. Beckham, Jas. R. Smith, P.A. Fletcher, W.G, Hayes, W.A. Suther, E.E. Johnson, J.A. Brow, ‘A.A. Neill, J.T. Holland, W.C, Thomp- son, W.M, Freeze, No. ] No. 2 State State va. JH. Williams, Alies J,H. Wilson. Forgery. Alias Capies. 1h State vs. Raleigh Miller and John Ab Allison. A.W.D.%. Alias Capias, No. 5 State vs. Raleigh Miller, Murder, Alias Capias. No. 6 State vs, Scarlor Davis and Jim McCerter, To show good behavier. Con't, vs, Ed. Hegler, Larceny, Continued, vs, Jim Talford, House Breaking, Alias Capias. vs. W.H. MeCerter, Retailing, Called and failed, Judgment Ni Sei Sci fa and Capias No. 10 State vs. Robert James, Retailing, Alias Capias, No. i2 State vs. D.V. Steele, Forging Check, Alias Capias. No. i2 State vs. Tucker Lin Banks, and Silas Harris, Larceny, Alias Capias. No, 13 State vs. Rosie Knox, Tom Knox, Lee Knox, Ella Knox, Larceny, Alias Capiag No, 14 , State vs. Walter Gatton and Minnie Pool, F & A, Alias Capias. No. 15 State vs, Fred Caldwell, Larceny, Alias Capias,. No, 16 State vs, Carter Reddick, Abandonment, Alias Capias. No. 17 State vs. Roger Gaither, Abandonment, Continued under former. order. Defendant not to appear until Jenuery Term ,1919 No. 18 State vs, Son Brown, Alias Geo. Kennett, Larceny, Alias Capias, 4 No, 19 ‘State vs. Roby Smith, A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. No. 21 State vs. Jim Carlton, A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. No. 22 State vs, C.C. Harpe, False Pretense, Continued, No, 23 State vs. John McDaniels, C.C.W. Called and failed. Judgment Nisci Sci fa and Capias, Instanter sci fa to issue. No. 24 | State vs. Watt Kerr, Abandonment, Continued, | No. 26 | State vs. Nal Sherrill, Walter Peacock, Jas. Peacock, Yancey Pdacoick, Affray. Cal lea and failed, Judgement Ni Set Sct fa and Cm ias, $200.00 appesrance bond required, Witness in this case dis- charged, | No. 28 4 | State vs. James W, Brown, Issuing worthless check, Called and failed. Judgment Ni sci Sci fa snd C@ias, unless defendent renews his bond within 30 days. Rond fixed at $200.00, w No. 29 |State vs. James VW, Brown, Issuing wrthless check. Continued, No. 3 State vs. Walter Shook, Larceny, The defendant in this case, through his Counsel, tenders to the State the plea of forcible trespass,, which plea is accepted by the State. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $10.00 and the costs in this case, to be taxed by the Clerk, , No, 23 State vs. John McDaniels, C.C.W. Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and the cost of this ac- tion, to be taxed by the Clerk. No. 25 State vs, John McDeniels, A.W.D.W. It is adjudged by the Court that the judgment be suspended upon the payment of the costs in this action, to be taxed by the Clerk. No. 25 State vs, .John McDaniels and his bondsman. Bond $4C0.00, In this case it is required that the State recover judgment shepse 4 2 oe 3t the Hecendeny and his bond - the Mieke 1 his Boia: ae ba # 23 and #25 on the State Docket, but of Sei fn snail be taxed, 183. No. 27 . A. Kerusos. Forcible Trespass. State witnesses, S.0, Lazenby ia ” in this case, is called end failed and fined $25.00, No. 30 State vs. Geo. Dulin. False Pretense. Capias and continued, No, 32 ° K . Larceny. State witness John Campbell, Julia Gray oe ee ian ped Sherpe called and failed. Judgment Ni sci Sci fa and it is adjudged by the Court that each pay a fine of $20.00, for failure to appear as subpoenaed to do in this case. NOs ce On Civil.Calender. M.M. Early vs. J.P. Little and Henkel-Craig Live Stock Co. von't for plaintiff. No. 33, 48 and 49 State vs. Dusty Brandon. A.W.D.W. and C.C,". On motion of the Solicitor, this case is continued for the State on account of the absence of State's witness Lummie Gray, who is alleged to be unable to come to court. Defendant is ordered into custody of the Sheriff and required to give bond justified and approved by the Clerk in the sum of $300.00 for her appear- ance in these several cases. No. 35 State vs. Fate Ladd. A.W.D.W. Called and failed, Judgment Nisci Sei fa and Capias. $300.00 bond req ired. Subpoena ordered for witnesses. Continued for the State. No, 36 State vs. L.F. Ladd. A.W.D.W. Called and failed. Judgement Ni sci Sci fa and Capias. $300.00 bond required. Supoena ordered for witnesses. Continued for the State, No, 38 State vs. Burley Myers and Flake Hollend. Having Liquor for Sale. Capias : for Iredell and Wilkes Counties, No, 39 State vs. Lee Houpe. Assault on Female. YDefendent, through his Counsel, tenders to the State that plea of simple assualt, which plea is uccepted by the State. No, 41 State vs. James Carlton,A.W.D.W. W.Y. Westmoreland called and failed. Judgment Ni sci Sci fa end Caw iss, $200,00 appearance bond required. L.W. Westmoreland bound Continued far the State, Subpoena for witnesse to issue to next Term, No. 58 State vs, Rutherford Templeton. Retailing. The defendant pleads rullty of the sale of a quart of liquor to Wilson Mullis on or about the first of September, 1917. ‘'hrough his Counsel he waives the finding of the Bill and pleads guilty. Judgment of the Court is in this case that the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 andcosts, to be taxed by the Clerk, No, 42 State vs. Rutherford Templeton. Retailing. The defendant pleads guilty. The Court having pronounced judgement against the defendant in No. 58, the judgment in this case, No. 42, is sus- pended upon condition that the “efendant be of good behavier, and upon condition that he promise the Court thet he will not. violate the liquor laws any more, and upon condition that he enter into a bond in the sum of $300.00, to make his apnear- ance this Court from Term to Term, at each criminal Term for a period of 18 months and show to the satisfaction of the Court that he has not violated the liquor laws, Power and discretion is re- served to the Court to pronounce judgement against the defendant if he does violate the licuor laws within five years from this date, the thirtieth day of July, 1918. Also upon condition that the defen- dant pay the costs in this case. He is ordered into the custody of the High ° Sheriff until the fine and costs in this case and the other case are paid, No. 57 State vs. Chal Stutts. A.W.D.W. This case, the defendant tenders a plea to the Solicitor of Simple Assualt, which plea is accepted by the State. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk. No. 43 State vs. R.G. Grant. Non support. Defendant called and failed, Judement Nisci Sci fa md Capies to issue unless defendant renews his bond in the sum of $100.00. No, 44 and 45 (cpnsolidated) State vs, Bob Benson and Walter Lawrence. A.W.D.". #44 State vs. Hob Benson and Walter Lawrence, Disturning Religious Worship.#45 Walter Lawrence Pleads guilty, In No. 44 and 45. Bob Benson pleads guilty in Nos. 44 and 45. In No. 45 the defendant Walter Lawrence and Bob Benson is ordered and adjudged to pay a fine of $25.00 each and the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk, In No. 44, judgment having been pronounced against the defendants in No. 45,the judgment in this case is sus- pended upon the payment of the costs an? upon good behevier. Power reserved by the Court to pronounce judgment within two years. i j i | i i No. 26 and 56.(Consolidated) State vs. Neal Sherrill, Walter Peacock, James Peacock, Yancey Peacock,#26 No. 56, Stste vs, Nal Sherrill, C,C.W. In No. 26 WalterPeacock, Yancey Peacock and Nal Sherrill Plead guilty. James Peacock pleads not guilty. No. 56 Nal Sherrill pleads guilty. In No. 26 the State takes a nol pros with leave as to Walter Peacock. In No. 26 it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that Yancey Peacock pay a fine of $2.00 and one-third of the costs. It is ordered by the Court that James Peacock pay a fine of *5.00 and one~third of Nal Sherrill, by consent of the Solicitor, is dis InNo. 26, it is ordered by the Court that Nal Sherri pay a fine of $5.00 and onesthird of the costs, and in No. 56 it is ordered that the defendant Nal Sherrill pay a fine of $20.00 and the costs, the costs, Judgment Ni sci arainst Yancey ets No. 40 State vs. Effie Money. A.W.D.W. By consent of the Bolicitor and the defendant,and Counsel for the defendant, the charge in the Bill of Indictment is changed to forcible trespass and upon this charge the defendant pleads guilty. Upon motion of the Solicitor Judgment is suspended upon payment of the costs and good behevier, Defendant is in custody of the Sheriff until costs are paid. No. 54 and 55 State vs. A. Karusos. Forcible trespass and injury to building, is continued by consent. No. State vs. Guy Bradshaw, Indictment enticing labor. Upon the call of this case the Solicitor states that the papers were lost. Move for continuance. This motion is grented upon condition that the case is set for trial at the Jamuery Criminal Term, 1919, and upon coridition thst the Solicitor shall notify one of defendant's counsel, either Gov. Turner or Mr. Weatherman, 15 days prior to the January Criminal Term, {If he demands the presence of the defendant at said term. By consent allowed pee go on presant bond, which is rreed 4s a gon z, - ing bond for his sspearance BEERS Jan ary ° The defendant being in Court, and in the presence of his counsel in open Court, agreed that his bond heretofore made is a continuing bond and is to remain a continuing bond, and that the mortgage securing the same is valid and shall be valid security for thesaid continuing bond and for his appearance at the January Term of Court. Judgment Ni sci heretofore rendered sgainst e defendent, by consent of Solicitor, is dismissee. No. 31 and 55 State vs, Shuford Miller. A,W.D.W, Defendant pleads not guilty, The following Jury: J,F.Stimson, L, A, Pope, H.T. Howard, G.,F, Neill, 7,1, Vickery, ”.M, Ramsey, W.H, Hunter, A.B, Parker, J.J.W, Levan, P.M, Raymer, E.R, Brady and ,C, Johnson, being sworn and empaneled, for their verdict say, they find the defendant guilty in No. 31 and not guilty in No, 53, It is ordered and adtudged by the Court that the defendant nay a fine of %25.00 and the costs to be taxed by the Clerk, No. 46 State vs. Harvey Lee Houston. Larceny. Capias and Continued, No, 47 State vs. James Gray. Assualt with deadiy weapon, Capias and continued, | No, 50 State vs. M.S. conppi1. A.W.D.W. Capias and continued, No. 51 State vs. Son Privett, Henry McDaniels, Affrey. Continued, Capias, No, 52 | State vs. Fair Bowles. Capias and continued. | Nos, 23 and 25, State vs. John McDaniels. C.C.%. and A.W.D.%. It having been made to appear to this Court, after judement was rendered against the defendant in No, 23 of fine of $50.00 and costs, and in No. 25 ‘a penny and costs, that the defenda’~t has been classified in the draft in Class One and sib- ject to call within the next thirty days. The judge~ent of court is that.,the fudment in No, 23 shall not be effecteMAuntil after the close of the present war, and the defen- dants's return to his home, or until he has been réleased from service in the present war, If the defendant is honorably discherged at any time from the Army after service, the court now sitting, if alive, will recommend his pardon. No. 32 State vs. Clarence King. Larceny. Phea not guilty. The following Jury: A.M. Turner, L.S, Waugh, C.f. Petterson J.W. Beckham, Jes. R. Smith, Ps . Pletcher, ° W.G, Hayes, W.A. Suther, “.#. hnson, 7.A. Brown, A.A. Neill, J.T. Holland, being sworn and empaneled for tiueir verdict say they find the defendant guilty. The jury having _ found thet a11 this brass passed to I.L, Gold. man in cherge of Junk Shop vill . oO the Court thet. e Mill will accept in lieu of the property if it has Se ane ot. by him, The Sheriff od Iredell County is authorized to serve notice on said Goldman of these cibcumstances that have been developed in the case of State vs. Clarence King in No. 32 on the State's dg Clarence King having been found guilty of the lerceny of the property, the judgmentof the court is that the prisoner be imprisone in the County Jail for the term of fourteen months with authority given to the Hoerd of County Commissioners, in their discretion, to assign him to labor pending histerm either at the County Home, where he must remain in proper custody,or upon the Public Roads of Tredell County. SCI FA DOC’ET. NO. iL State vs. Will Goforth. Called and failed. Judgment absolute according to terms of Sci fa. No. 2 State vs. Walter Brandon.Judgment absolute according to terms of Sci fa, No. 3 State vs. Horace licNeely. Judgment absolute according to terms of Sci fa, No. 4 S vs. Raymond Shaw and his bondsmen, It is considered and ad judred i la tne Court that the State recover judgment alisolute = against the defendent in the sum of $20 0,00, penalty of the bond. The same to be discharged, nevertheless, upon condition that the defendant pay all the cost to which the County is liable infthe original case of his % principal or principals. And, also, upon the condi tion that he payd the cost of this Sci fa in addition thereto the sum of $69.00. No. 8 State vs. Hub York. Judgment absolute according to terms of Sci fa. \ No. 6 State vs. Guy Bradshaw. On motion of the Solicitor, Sci fa is dismissed. 4 ae ae ea sa August--5th., 1918. The honorable court convened at 10;10, August 65th., 1918, for the dé@spatch of business. Judge Be F. Long presiding. No 2--Kate B. Patterson Vs Statesville Air Line Railway Company. Upon the call of this case the plaintiff submits to voluntary non suit. It is, therefore, considered and edjudged that the Pts gene on-suited. Judpment against plaintiff onds costs. No. 3--Zeke McDaniels Vs Vernice NcDaniels--- i Plaintiff is called and failed to prosecute his action Ld against the defendant; whereupon, it is adjudged by the Court that the plaintiif be ogg re by non-swited. vudement against the pleintiff, ond Yar costs. No 4--Dixon Crucible Co. Vs Kk. P. Albison---— Upon the call of this case the plaintiff submits to voluntary non suit. It is therefore, con@idered and adjudged that the fointizrmbore s non-suited. Judgement against pleintifi fond § costs. bo No 5-<-P. Kk. Hancock Vs. Candace Hancock--- Plain.tiii is called and failed to prosecute his action ee ageginit the defendant; whereupon, it is edjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be a -hereby,non-suited. Juégnent against the plaintiz bond costs. No 6-- J. A. Galliher ve P. H. Lazenby--- 4 Under a former judgment of non suit against th intiff and his bond it i8 off the docket, aie ie rn v James A plaintiff. Pe ttenm and Bey a, Alias Summons for 2. yw 8 b. We. Adams. Ny r « We Adams. | VY No 1l--HeC Ws: Scott Trustee o Continued. | [9 t T Jorman and J. aoe ae rmstrong Vs Emma Armstrong. Vontinued for the FOwel) . Wy .%. Bogor: Co ee No 18--peresville Furn. Co. V8eeJe)Q- Sohlen-- ‘Upenpthe call of.thisccase the plaintiff being called iis fails to appear and prosecute its action against defendant, Je O. Sohlen, whereupon, it is considered and edjudged b the Court that the pleintitf be and is hereby ee r 3 no uited pe wyegeent is rendered against the ple int itt debona : costs. We Powell e rs lio l6-- J. &. Glover and wife, Elva Glover vs : Western Union Tel Co. Continued. lio BUr-- Kk. L. Maiden vs A. F. Harris, Continued No 5b--- d. Ke Saville vs An F. Harris. Continued No 52---- J, wv. Kaneer ve Statesville Cotton Mills. Continued. ‘No 38--- C. D. Moore vs Loyd Cloaninger. ; Continued. NON, JURY CASES sone the non-jury cases at this term Nos 27, 20, 29, 30, 68, all age a 'wi thou + Order of Heptazophs, “lo 13--continuea 3 Ho 19--Alias August 6th--1918 The honorable court convened at 9:30. A. M. 18--Jessie sbrawley vs Lola srawley. Continued. 2le-Me Me Earley vs Je Pe. Little and Henkle Craig Live Stock Ompény. fm. ontinued. ‘ V a w 22-e--Continued. --d.e E. Sigmon, J. M. Kinehardt and Rutlege vs Upper Coddle Creek “rainage Dist. Be ; £3-eContinued tor the defendent to file his answer. --The R, , j Mfg. C. v8 Se Ke brown aud Son. 2E--Counsel agreed for time to file pleadings for plaintiff and defendant. A. Karusos vs G A. Critcher end Eunice Crifoher ‘ i 3 5 Q + > > } es 3 27--Continued by consentr-R. §. Sherrill vs Southern R. Rk. ek 32--Continued.--Flora Lewis vs Western Union Tel. Co. | 2 : et } ee 34--Bo..d for jucgmente-ii. D. Troutman vs Mrs. M. E. westmorelant. 9 26--Continuedr-Lewis Campbell vs Rowan Campbell. at 36--Compromised. Costs peid. Off.--/7. C. Yates vs R Lower ye 42--Continued..ccccceeeeKyles by his next friend vs 7 uyers. 44eeEmpire Mfg. Co., vs %. Pe: Carpenter--It appears in’ this cage that several terms ago that pl iffs appeal was dismissé With costs taxed against nen CPR tage bond, if there is @ bond. This case is now ordered off the docket under the former judgment. gm 45--J. L. Honeycutt vs J. Pe Miills--It appears to the Court in this case that this case was settled by compromise several years &go, and that pleintiif is to pay helf the costs end the defendent to pay the other helf. It ig now adjudged that this case is dis- missed from the docket and that the Clerk tax half the costs ageinst the plaintiff and half egainst the defendant. 47---lrs. Jv A. Farmington vs "alter and Chas. Vanstory-- Continued. 48---D. E. Turner & Co., vs Souk. R. Co. Continued for plaim titt. oO-@ alter A. frost & Co., vs J. Ke Morrison Grocery Co. Continued. 54---J. lie Howard vs Lee Albertson, et ale=- The plaintiff is called and failed to prosecute his action against the ‘thd defendant; whereupon, it is considered and s£djudged by t Court that he be and is hereby non-suited. Judgment is rendered egainst the plaintiff and his bond for costes S6--ileshman Morrie So vs S. E, srown, et al--Continued by consent. B7--k. L. Maiden vs A. ¥. Harris--The Plaintiff is ellowed - days in which to file demurrer. 60---Jessie B. VanCamp-vs P, P. Kennedy and H. C, Hunter- Continued. 61---Jessie B. VanCemp vs Mart Carson, et al--Continue 64--Sou K. Re Co., vs Queen Knitting Mill--Gontinuea consent ; : ee ig case there was a rendered herein st a former horn. a under the seid judgment was to pay the costs. is now dismissed from the docket under the ) Gear Bane aE Peas TE Sees Ey Bey at t 67--L. W. Westmoreland vs W. “Y. Westmoreland-- Continued for plaintiff. Should have been on appearance docket. 73-0 We Me Lundy vs J S. Moore & Co and J* S,. Moore and 0. T. Leonard. Error. Should heave been on appearance calendar. 15 days f&llowed plaintiff to file replication. Continued. 75--In Re We We Houpe’s will. Compromise. Open for judgment. 76--Je We Morrison vs Morganton Pur. Co.--Time to file pleadings under the general order. 79--S,. Me. Goodman vs F. EH. Wallace-- In this cese the plaintiff submits to a voluntary non-suit against the defendant, Mrs. Nancy Byers, and judgment of non- suit is accordingly rendered and for costs es to this defendant. Time to file pleadings under the general order is allowed both parties, and case is continued. At this term, upon the call of the apnearance calender, it is ordered that the plaintiffs shall be allowed 30 days in which to file complaints as of this term, from the end of the term; and the defendant | 30 days thereafter in which to answer or demur, except in those cases wherein judgments by default are taken in open court for cause shown, and except in those cases wherein some special order otherwise is made. (On Non-Jury Docket) No. 70--#irst National hank Vs. T. Foy White. Continued. (On Non-Jury Docket) No 39 E. J. Johnson vs Consolidated Eng. Co. (Inc) The Court having called this case twice at this term, no parties nor attorneys appearing, it is ordered that the same shall be dismissed from the docket at the next term, unless Someone does appear and show cause why this cease shall remain on the docket. The Clerk is directed to issue notice to plaintiff or plaintiff's counsel of this order. No 24--Miss J. O. Sherrill vs C. A. Dulin: In this case the high sheriff of Iredell county, or his deputy, Mr. Yoodsides, or any other deputy sheriff of this county, is hereby authorized to summons Mrs. Bula Deal as a witness in this case in Catawba county, or any other county in North Carolina where she may be found, notifying her to appear here as # witness instanter in behalf of the defendant in this case. Also her husband, Herbért Deal, and to this end the sheriff is authorized to use the telephone or telegraph, being clothed to act with full power in this or any othér county. w No 26--CecP.cDealivedDr. Be Ee Little & Le Ve Cloaninger--- Case continued. Leave for the defendant to have 20 days to “1 answer, 30 days thereafter for the plaintiff to reply. ie Bboek, by Median werd, %.. Grunes Continued. Tarr $0 we A: Bact . Auguet 8th., 1916 She honorable court convened at 9:25 on Thursday, August 8th,, 1918, for the despatch of business. 28--E. Morrison vs % C. Alexander--continued by consent. 43--J. Fh. Rimmer vs U. Ie Rosemane--Upon representation of counsel that this case has heretofore been settled and judgment taken, it is ordered off under former judgment. 46--l. S. Templeton vse Cal Kamseyr-Plaintiff is called and fails ¢ prosecute his ection against Cal Ramsey, and the plaintiff ig non-suited accordingly. Judgment rendered against pleintiff and his bond for costs. 49--\jilloughby sb. Pharr vs Modern Woodmen of the World-- Plaintiff is called end fails to prosecute heg action &rainst the defendant; whereupon, it is considered and adjudged hy the Court that ghe be and is hereby non-suited by the Court. Judgment is rendered against the plaintiff and her bond for costs. 5l--Dr. We De. Gilmore vs Re. Y. Davis--Continued. 6k--M.e We Christy vs Minnie Christy--- Plaintiff is called and fails to prosecute his action against the defendant; whereupon, it is considered and adjudged by the Court that -he be and is hereby non-suited by the Court. Judgment is rendered against the plaintiff and his bond for costs. 6¥---8. Morrison vs Carolina Motor Co and A. Le Barringer. Continued by consent. 7ze-J. Ce Rush vs J. C. Brooksher-- Plaintiff is called and fails to prosecute his action against the defendant; whereupon, it is considered ent adjudged by the Court that he be and is hereby non-suited by the Court. Judgment is rendered against the plaintiff and his bond for costs. 74--Je i. Thayne vsyJ. ESMackie-- Plaingity jis cdJled Aha fakls ‘to/Aprosecyte hes action again h¢ devendarts whefeupoy, /it ix fonsdferem kné adjuAged b e hoprt|thxt he we én¢is/hertYy ponfsylted by Ahe’Court. Jhegment“is rinderéd agabrst plgrntiff and his bond for costs. 56--4, G. Gaither vs We Ae Moore. Tried. 75--In he Matter of william Houpe's ‘Vill. At this term J. E. Murdock, guardian of Hazel Murdock, Ruth Mordock, Joe Murdock, Jr., Kate Murdock and Cora Murdock come in end make themselves parties to this provision, through and by their ettorney, L. C. Caldwell, and they are permitted to adopt the pleadings heretofore filed, or to file other eee 2e during this term; whereupon, the said parties hrough and by their said attorneys adopt the pleadings here- tofore filed in this case, to the end that the judgment may bp taken agreeably to the terms of compromise made between a4. the parties at this term. $ No l7--J. A» Davidson ve Dimond Furniture Company--Upon the rendit of the verdict in this case the defendant moves for new tr Motion denied. xception. Judgment agreeably to the verd Defendant excepts to the judgment and appeals to the Supreé Court. Notice of appeal is waived in open Court and ) as $20 is considered sufficient. The counsel ef 1 a lleant shell have thirty days in atthe appellee thirty days thes reafter in ig bay a Le ee a F%, i i i | j ; Ta /North Carolina In the Supertor Court | Iredell county August Term I9I8 /W.S. Brown ~ | vs Judgment 'S.B. Harris | This cause comming to be heap# before the Judge B.F, Long and in | appearing that the matters in controversy have been settled by S.B, Harris — Agreeing to open up a chenmaél through his land to W.S5, Browns line and to Low |give W.S. Brown a clear channel for the flow of the water thruught the said $.B, Harris lands and further by the said S.B. Herris agreeing to pay all the court cost in this action except the witness fees for plaintiffs witnesses and the officers fees subpoenaing plaintiffs witnesses and plaintiff W.S, Brown agreeing to pay all court costs in this action except the witness fees for | plaintiffs witnesses and the officers fees for subpoenaing plaintiffs witnesse anggthe plaintiffes witnesses and the plaintiff .S, Brown Agreeing to pay 'all his own Witness fees and the officers coast for subfoeaning the same and by further agreeing to open the channel cut by Harris to the plaintiffs line through his own, Plaintiffs, -land Both parties to keep the channel open and free from obstruction on his respect land. It is therefor ordered and adjudged that S.B. Harris open a channel at the place agreed upon and as now understood be plaintiff and defendant thm ough his land to the line of W.S, Brown and to keep same clear of obstructiéa s, the said channel being of sufficient size to carry the ordinary flow of the water in said channel and that said S,B. Harris pay all court coast for subpo- enaing plaintiffs witnesses and that the said W.S, Brown is to continue said channel and open up same from hie line through his land and keep ssid channel free from obstruction so as not to overflow defendants land below and that the said W.S. Brown pay his own.witnesses fees and.the. officers coast for Subpoen- aing the plaintiffs witnesses itis see Te udge és Ne North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County, July Term I9I8 GS “on, Miller | vs Hardaway Consbruction Company This case comming on to be heard and being heard at this Term of the Court, and it appearing that the parties have compromised all matters a existing between them and set out in the pleading in this cawee, and that " the amount agreed upon as a full settlement and satisfaction of plaintiffs Claim and demands, to wit: the sum of four Hundred and fifty Dollars, has been the plaintiffs be the defendants: It is therefor considered and adjudged that the plaintiff take nothing by his writ in his actions, and the& as to all demands and /Claims of the plaintiffs against the defendant, growing out of plaintiffs injury as alleged in the complaint, the defendant go without day. ane If further Considered and adjudged that the defendant | pay the coast of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of thés court, JUDGMENT B.F. LONG os | Approved, Judge Presiding J.&. Steward J.V. 2 w.G. Turner. “Ritorneys Tor iment slaintlit | HP. Grier rney for defendant North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County July Term, I9I8. AC.M. Shook va Carolina Moter Company -- This case comming on to be heard before HisHonor B.F. Long, Judge Presiding, and’ being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the Parties to this action have agreed upon a aubgaxk settlement of the matters in contraversy in said action; ' Itiis therefor considered, ordered and ad! by the Court that the note executed by the plaintiff to the defendant be delivered "0 Caritas and that the automobile now in the posséemion of the plaint vered to the defendant. : . Sci Saae It is further considered, ordered: and adjuged that the Pay the defendant the sum of fifty doliars and pay the coast of th | to be taxed by the Clerk of thie Court. Sgt on Upon the call of this case the plaintiff submits to voltntary non- suit. It is therefor, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff is hereby non--suited, Judgment against plaintiff for bonds and coast, ....BeF, LONG... Judge Presiding, No I5 Mooresville Furniture Co.} vs Judgment. J.O. Sohlen L Upon the call of this case the plaintiff being called fatiled to uw“ appear and prosecute its actions against defendant, J,9, Sohlem, whereupon, | it 4s considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be, and hereby © non-suited, and judgment is rendered against the plaintiff for bond and coast, -oBo be. Long... Judge Presiding, | No 5 P, R. Handcock vs } Judgment, Candace Hahdace Handcock ) . Plaintiff is called and fialed to presecute hie action against yu ag¢ffinbe ahd defandeh};nohepatped, it is adjugded by the court that the plain- Judgment against the plaintiff for bond and coast. vbedeedodeeueeds0esdasciueeeeseeeseeee Presiding No #@ 4 Dixion Crucible CO, VS R.P. Allidon Judments Up on the call of this case thé plaintiff submits to voluntsry non-suit, Vv it is , there fore, gsumaztradx considered and adjudged that the a plaintiff is here by non suited, judgments against plaintiff for bonds and cost. -BeF. LOWES nc coceledescss Tannen Presidis NO S | ' Zoke McDaniels ) | -VS- ) Vernice McDaniels ) TV Plaintiff is called and faile@ to prosebute his action agaimst the def ndant} where upon, itisadjuded by the cort xamk xxm that the plaintiff be ang . is here by non-suited, Judment ageinst the plaintiff for bonde and co @ oft Statesville, N.C, Aug--8--I9I8, July term Irelel] Superior court, Due Ola mimimeiteh® Qemmen H, Cruse, court reporter, REporter court proceedings five dayse@ $10, per day $50.00 Approved by cevecccrssveresees SAaee presid The court certifies that time reported is correct, And gquanpqumpleem” stenaguapher should be paid agreable to her ce , whike itel terms, os itle court deals Pac wah? Seer B.F, LONG Judge Preeedings, % : 161 report of the grand jury, July terms, I9I8, We the gran jurybeg to make the following reportoo---- we pastron all bikls ‘presented to us, we visibed the country home by committee and found this home in good condition and found foty twom(42@) | inmates, twenty two white and twenty calored , we found the immates well | carpdfor in every way, we visited the county jailin a body and found only a few prisoners, we found the white prisoners well kept thair department | put recommed that the (col)prisoners department be cept in more saniteby | condition; we also recomend that the padded sellsfor the insane be revai® ed,;# we visited the diffrent county officers and found them wellkent ee-wer2r- we so far as we couldascertain, we recommend that more disinfect ant be used in the toilet rooms of the corthouse, J,.L., Harris Foreman, ’ North Carolina ) Trdeli county 9 ¥& We? troutmang Mrs M.E, Westmoland ) This cause coming on to be herd and being herd before his honorB,F, Long presiding and it a pearing to the court that the parties have compromis thair dispute in this action on the following terms, to wit: plaintiff to make judgement a gainst the defendant for the sum of $261.55 with intrest therefore from Novenber 7TH I9I6,. at the rate of six percent annum until paid, and to credit the defendant with the payment of$25,00 on fimterest as the first day of the present term: It is there fore condsidered and adjudged that. plaintiff recover of thas// defeniant Mrs M.E, Westmoland the sum of two hundred and sixty one and 55f00 dollers, with intress there fpome November 7th I9T6., at the rate of six persent per annum until pee subjuct to a credit of $25.00 made july 29th I9I8., and tha® plaintiff recover the costs of this action to be taxed by the clerk of this court. Approved i, P, Grier 6 erent a a horney for plaintiff Le B.F. Long RB, MoGlothi Attorney Tor derentan Judge Presiding ' cMisse J,O. Sherrill *# vs Dulin ) % First Was the plaintiff seduded vy the Tssues C.A. defendant as alleged in the complalit Answer YES oe Second, What damageg,if any, in platntiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer $2000.00 _ North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County. July te T9I8 Miss J.0, Sherrill vs C.A. DULIN t Judgment This cause coming on to heard and being heard before his Honor B,F. Long Judge and a Jury, and it appearing to ee from the record in the esse thet this an action for the “o , ee of the plaintiff by the defendant by a promis of ® toss a writ of Arrest and Bail wes issued under which the defendan up oy arrested and held to beil in the sum of 70.000.0 on a having the umderteking requre by law with L.B, Bristol ef Brawley as sureties on se a bail bond, and the jury haying the issues, submitted by the in faver ne ) ‘ oS Plaintiff Gapetéma, is called and fails to prosecute his action Second. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the) &§ dgainst the defendant; it is considered and-adjudged by the Court that he defandant? Answer $2,000.00 " sp . be and is hereby non-suited by the Court. Judggiment is rendered against It is therefor considered and adjudged by the court that plaintiff a the plaintiff and his bond for costs ‘recover of the defandant and the sum of Ywo Thousand Dollars (2.000.000 ae BeF, Long, Judge Presiding. with interest thereon from the 29th day of July I9IS. ( same being the firse a é 7 day of the eal and the coast of this action to be taxed by the clerk of th Bs court. It is further adjudged that the execution issue against the property of the defendant, and if said execut’on be returned unpaid, that execution a North Carolina, In the Superior Court, July Term ,I9T8. then issue against the person of the defandant, said C.A. Dulin. as provided Ir4dell County. by the law in such ease, and that the defandant bail be proceeded against as No 46 is provided by law. BF. Lom’? R.S. Templeton } Judge Presiding — vs t JUDGMENT, { Cal Ramsey t J.O, Sherrill. : VS Plaintiff is called and fails to prosecute his action against C.A? Dulin. : Cal'Ramsey, and the plaintiff is non-suited accordingly, Judgmemt rendered against plaintiff and his bond for costs B.F, Long Judge Presiding The defendent For the new cort from new t#Labs, for alledge @rrow: in the charge of the court and admission of evidence, moline overruled and the defendant excepted. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Judgement for plaintiff, and appeal to the Supereme Court in open court ‘Iredell County. July Term, T9T8, notice of appeal would bond in the sum of fifty dollars adjuged infficent, Thirth days by against to make one case in sppeal and thirth days to the - ‘J.A. Davidson ; defandant after service on Defendant plaintiffs Case. vs ! Judgment ‘Diamond Furniture co No 77 This case coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before S.M. Goodman vs F.H. Wallace JUDGMENT, his Honor, B.F. Long, Judge presiding, and a Jury, being heard and it 3 appearing to the Court that the defendant turstee in bankruptcy admits | that the value of the lumber claimes by the plaintiff in the ection at In this case the plaintiff submits to a voluntary non-suit against the time it was replevied by the defendant wes $192.15 the defendent,. Mrs. Nancy Byers, and judgment of non-suit is accordingly And, It further appearing upon the admission of said defendant that rendered and the goast, as to thie defendant. he has sold and disposed of said lumber, and the same cannot be delivered Time to file pleadings under the general order is allowed both parties, up to abide the Judgment of the Court, and the jury having answered the and the case is continued, ‘ ‘a : issues submitted to them, namely: Bel. Long........+.Judge Presiding. Ist--"Is the plaintiff the owner and entitled to the possession of the lumber described in the vomplaint ?" ; Answer--- Yes, 1 No 54 : It further appemring to the Court that the defendant gave its J.M. Howard Judgment, undertaking, as provided by law, with FE. Morrison and H.0.Steele as sureties, 8 Condition to pay the plaintiff a11 such sum as he may recover of the defendant e Albertson, et-al-- with interest thereon. a 4 2 It is therefor ,considered and adjudged by the Court that the pla- The plaintiff is called and failed to prosecute his action ageian’ 5 4 |intiftf recover of the defendant trustee and z. rrtacd and H 0. Steele, the defendant, whereupon, it is considered and adjudged by the Court tha nt surties under the undertaking aforesaid, the sum of “#192715, with interest | he be £mand and is hereby non-suited,. ¢ : a thereon from December 20th, I9I7 t d the coast th Judgment is rendered against the plaintiff and his bond for costs. to be taxed by the Clerk rs ae tees” paid, and oast of this action _.B.P. Long Judge Presiding. B.F. Long. Tudge Presiding, ‘ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. July Term, I9I8, a4 North Carolina “pn ead lie toe eet 7 No 72 | ee . \fredei1 county. Aug, Term, 1918 gf | ° ~-- 4 to Rush JUDGMENT. us 4 b J.B, Lenara | re . | i vs { | JC. Brooksher - | MDE Brom | Judgement Plaintiff is called and failed to prosecute his action against the a 4 This c ° defendant; it is considered and adjudged by the Court that he be and is 3 ’ | Honor, B.F. Lote) todos Srectatnd aah tee aeesuener or a gudieing ua Rocka hereby non-suited and his bond for coast an Nie ruden teense _ Prosecute his actial and having signified in open Court that he desied to ols ng « & oO ® non-suit it is hereby ordered by the Court that the plaintiff be lowed to take a volintary non-suit. o . North Carolina In the Superior Court, : 4 B.F. Long, Judge Presid, Iredell County. o1 July Term, I9I8, oe Carolina In the Superior Court ure ha dell Coun r No 49 | i, ty. Puly Term, I9I8, Willoughby B. Pharr vs ‘ C.A, Spesces tradi : ee Judgment. . fine’ trading under the Xr Modern Woormen of the Wourld, j _ g@ Grece; : and style of Margareoie | Plaintiff is called and failed to prosecute her action against tl defendand; whereupon, it is considered and adjudged by the Court thet be and is hereby non-suited by the Court, Judgment is rendered against - plaintiff and her bond for costs, ee B.F. Long . Judge North Carolina ; In the Superior Court, - [Iredell County. July Term, I9I8, No 62 Tis case coming on to be heard at the July term I9I8, of the Super4 court of Iredell County, before His Honor? B.F. Long, Judge, Presiding and it appearing to the Court that the parties have agreed that B.R,. Thuyman and E. Morrison were not PArtners, but that B.R, Thurgman is Liebleg +, the plaintiff on a note and execeeted to the plaintiff and that the defendant E. Morrison having admitted his liabibity on said note by reason od hig endorsement on said note to the extent of one hundped dollars and the said Morrison having paid the said amount to the plaintiff. It 4s therefor considered and ordered and adjuged that the plaintif recover nothing in this action and thet the defend ant pay the costs of action to be taxed bg the Clerk of this Court. B.F. Long Judge Presiding North Caarolina { Iredell County } In the Superior Curt ]} July Term, I9IS 16 In the matter of the Will.) JUDGMENT, of WWie Houpe, deceased, \ \/ This capse, coming on to heard at this Term of the Court, before His Honor, B.F. Long, Judge Presiding, upon the record in this case, and it appearing to Court that all parties interested, namely: Frank Houpe; Mrs. | Bancy Houpe, widow of W.W, Houpe, deceased; J,R. Eddinger and wife, Columbia Eddinger; 7.% Houpe; Della I. Houpe; J.E, Murdock, individually, and J,™, | lurdock, guardian of Hazel Murdock, Ruth Murdock, Joe Murdock, JYre, Katbe Murdock and Cora Murdock, infants under the age of 21 years 014 and herein represented by the said J.E, furdock, duly qualified guardian, have arreod | upon a compromies of all maters, things and differences under the will of the late W.W. Houpe, which will was the subject of controversy in this action, | upon the followering terms: FIRST: That the paper writing filed for probate as the last will and testament of W.W, Houpe, deceased, shall be admitted to proabate as the | last will and testament of the said W.W. Houpe, and that all provisions therein be carried out by the adminietrator with the will annexed, to be heretnafte named except and upon the following conditions, which are the subjects and agreements of this compromise. (a) That J. Rufus Houpe, named in sald will as the executor, is not to qualify as executor, but retires from the duties of said executorship withou prejudice to his one-sixth interest in said estate under said will; that w.W. Holland shell become, after his qualification by the Clerk of the Court and has executed such bonds as the Court shall require to administer with t will annexed in place of the said J,R. Houpe. executor retiring. (B) That the sum of$5,500,00 out of the estate of tre said W.W. Houpe be set aside and turned over to R,7T, Weatherman, trustee, after he shall haveexecuted such bond es the court shall deam sufficient to the end that 4 not exceed $300.00 per year, arising from said fund set fourth, shell be pai by him if he shall deem so much necessary, to Mrs, Nancy Houpe, deceased, &@ in the event that 1t becomes necessary to supply the said Mrs, Nancy Houpe with any addition to the above amount per year, then and in that event, sai trusbee shall receive from the Clerk of Court an order to authorize whateve additional payments for sickness which may be necessary, and after the deat of the said Mre. Nancy Houpe, widow, as aforssid, after deduction such burt Ls expencies and the coast of administerine the trust hie herein created, &@ said trustee shall deem proper, considering the stat@on and surroundings 0 the said Mrs Nancy Houpe, shall be distributed to those entitled under the will aforsaid; the said Nancy Houpe, herein agreeing to accept said gettl in lieu of any and all rights which she may have under the will and under the law of the state of the said W.W, Houpe, her deceased husband. (C) That the administrator, aforsaid, so soon as the best interest of the estate shall suggest, shall reduce to his posséssion all properties belonging to the said estate, both real and personal, and shall sell all th lands of whicl the said W.W. Houpe, deceased, died seized and possessed, at public sale at the court house door in Statesville, upon such terms and z conditions as in the opinioh shall eubserve the best interest of said esta convert all other personal property into cash, collect all debts and evide of debt into eash, and after deductiong herein before set aside and paid to R.T, weatherman, trustee, as sforsaid, the costs of administering said trully together with all the debts due by said estate, and the coast of this action and all attorneys fees therein, making distrubution ree the devisees n® wid in said will, excepting the proportion of Nancy Houpe, ow, a8 aforsait the following manner, to-wit: | TO Frank Houpe, one-sixth thereof; a To Mrs, Columbia Eddinger, wife of J.R, Eddinger, one-sixth the To U.E. Maurdock guardain of Hazel Murdock and Cora vurdock, one=' To Della I. Houpe, one-sixth thereof; fiat To Jerry B, Houpe, one-sixth thereof; fo J.R. Houpe, one-sixth thereof; A the administrater, after the sale of said real estate, and the paym im of the entire purci.ase money, shall make, execute and deliver to. r, or Pp ager, thereof,a good end Lewfui deed, without order * Bil ih a i | North Carolina, the same. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered and decreed by the Court that the compromise and agreement between the parties hereto be, and the same is hereby in all respects confirmed, B.F. Long Judge Presiding. ‘North Carolina | | In the Supertor Court ‘Iredell County | July Term-I91I8 .- \J.W, Douglass } vs } Judgment 'H.0, Thompson } This cause comming on to be heard before Judge B.F°. Long this temm ‘and being heard and it appearing that the controversey has been settled by H.O. Thompson agreeing that judgment shall be taken for the sum of sixty — ‘five déllars and that the line on the lumber as filed before C,V, Voils 7.?. ‘Shall be of friend, It is therefor ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defandant the sum of$65.00 and this Judgment is » speoific bein on the |lumber which was cut by the plaintiff on the land of H,9, Thompson and on which e lien was filed here to fore before C.V.Voils$J.P. which lien 1s ‘hereby affirmed and it is further ordered that the court be taxed against ‘the defendant by the Clerk of the Court Execution not toineu 50 days, Z.V. Tourlington Atty. for plaintiff. \A.S. Starr Atty. ifor Defendant. B.F, Long Judge Presiding North Corolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. July Term I9I8, ‘es ; . Mrs,’ Flora S. Lewis. L | vs Judgment Western Union Telegraph Company This cause coming on to be heard at this tedrm of the Court , and being heard and it appearing to the Court that the parties heave compromised all matter in dispute in this action the jefendant agreeing to | remound ( and has already remound) it poles wires froin the plaintiff land | and not to reoccupy said land with it poles wire and fixture, and to pay while occupying her land and the certs of the actions. action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court and that the defendant be and of the plaintiff d4seurted in hér complaint. It is agreed that the defendant may have until next term of this Court in which to object to this judgement or any part thereof, B.F. Long Judge, Pte North Carolina; In the Superior Court Iredell County. July Term I9T8 E.G, Gaither vs Issue W.A, Moore ' Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff and if so what amount? Answer Yes $50.00 nd interest from Jan, I-18 In the Superior Court | Tredeli county, . July Term I9I8, | ane #0. Gaither \ WA, Moore 4 the Court for execution same, and without any decree of the Court confipming _the plaintiff the sum of $35.00 dollars in full for all damage done plaintiff It is therefor considered and adjudged by the tmamkpk Court that the pla-| intiff recover of the defendant the sum of 35,00 dollars and the coast of this it is hereby enjoyned and restrained fpom further trespassing on this lands j Ln: o— in favor of the plaintiff and finding the améunt due the plaintiff over and above amount herefor received to fifty dollers. Is therefor considered and "eA tredell County, In the Superior Court, $50,00 with interest from gan. I. I9I8, and coast of action to be taxed bay North Carolina. July Term I9I8, by the Clerk of this Court against said defendant, adjudged that E.G. Gaither receive of the defendant Moore the sum of ‘N.D. Tomlin & W.D .Turner j B.F. Long. L- Receivers of Iredekl Hwd, Co. | Judge Pt. vs \ yl C,E. Sloan \ American Mills Co. } vs Q Issue oe ‘This cause cause coming in ¥4 for hearing upon the appesrance docket and it /L,H. Revis } afofseafing to the Court that summing was duely issued and served on the a ‘defendant men than ten dseys prior to this term of the Court and the compla- Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff and if so and what ‘dnt was and is duely verfied and was filed July I0, I9I8 . and the defendant Answer. Yes, $177.10 ‘has failed to answer said complaint, the cause of action being an open ‘account: It is therefor considered and dgjudged that the plaintiff have judgement against said defendant by defent for work of an answer: and North Carolina, In the Superior Coubt ‘that inquiry be made as to the amount due the plaintiff, it a subsequent Iredell County Aug. Term I9I8, term of this Court. Judgement by default by in inauery The American Mills Co., Inc. B.F. Long. vs Judge, Pt. / |\L.H. Revis @ STAR GROCERY& MEAT MARKET?., 4 Judgment This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, B.F. Long Judge Presidi and jury, and being heard, and the jury having answered the issue the favor | of the plaintiff and against the defendant:" Is defendant indebted to ' plaintiff and if so what amount? Answer; $I77.IO with interest from Aug. 9th} als It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff cover of defendant the sum of one hundped and seventy seven dollars and ten ct, 177.10) with interest from the ninth day of August I9I7 and for the coast this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, B.F. Longe Judge Pt ° North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredll County. July Term I9I8, yi >A: Lowrance § + vs Joseph L. Adams } This cause coming on to be heard at this tearm before Judge B.F. Longand ; itafforing that since the summons was sent on the defendant, the defendant paid a small sum to be credited on certain notes held by the plaintiff against the said defendant and which said notes. about to be bound by the Statute of Limitationt and the defendant made the said payment so that the said notes would not be bound by the Statue of Limitationt, with the further agreement that this action be with drawn and that the plaintiff pay the coast of this action. It is therefor ordered and derled that this action be dismiq sse@ according to the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant and that the coast be pag&d by the plaintiff to be taxed by the clerk of this Count Judgment, B. a Long. Judgg Pt. North Carolina, : In the Superior Court Iredell County. July Term I9I8, E.G. Gaither q vs JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT AND INQUERY, WM. A.’ Moore 4 ; This cause coming on to be heard at this tearm of Court and it appearing to (the Court, that the summons in this cause was issuedg end served more peor prior to the May term of th@é& Court @md the complaint was pe | verified an filed at May term of the Court, and the cause of the action is formed upon | open acount for rents forfited of the plaintiff farm and the defendant has | fail to answer to the said eomplaint, It is therefore considered and aa jadged that the plaintiff have judgement against said defendant by default for wan of an answer and is herein as rendered, It 1s further adjudged that inquery | be made at this term of Court as to theamount due the plaintiff by the dete. endant growing out of the matter se’ up by the complaint, : B.F, Longe . Judge, Pt. wie i . October Term 1915. | NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT OF IREDELL SUPERIOR COURT, ‘The local Ber in meeting assembled recommended to the Hon. Judge B,F,Long, Judge. holding Iredell Superior Court which is to meet according to statute on october 14th, 1918, and sit two weeks, that on account of the epidemoe of’ spanish Influenza, now over the State and county, all jurors, witnesses and parties to civil action be notified not to attend said court, _ Whereas, the Judge announced thet he will conply with the request of the bar ad the Clerk is ordered to make publication accordingly that there will be no session of court whatever, except that the court will open Monday, the 14th instant, at 10 o'clock, when all defendents under bond to appear at the criminal court may appear and renew their bonds. Court will also at this sitting fix bonds in bailable cases for all persons in jail awaiting trial, The Judge will also at said sitting hear all motions in civil mgkianz cases desired, J,A,Hartness, Clerk rede ounty Superior Court, This 10th. day of October, 19181 Ete te ARTE ETE ETE EE ETE EE EE North Carolia, IEEE SER SEAR Sat Iredell County. MONDAY, OCTOBER 14th, 1918, Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County of Iredell on the 6th. Monday after the 1st. Monday in September, The same being the 14th. day of October, 1918, when and where his Honor, Judge B.F.,Long, is present and presiding and Hon. Hyden Clement, Solicitor is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. North Carolina, § In The Superior Court. Iredell County. Liberty Hosiery Manufecturing Company } vs. | 4 INTERPLEA, Chinnabee Valley Mills. i | In the above entitled action the Isbell National Bank, of the city of Talladega, State of Alabama, comes into Court and intervenes, filing this _ wherein it respectfully shows unto the court the following facts respecting its title and right of possession to the property attached in this ‘ction and the grounds of such right and title to wit; First; That the intervener is a National Nank duly organized and 3 eithing under and by virtue of the laws of the United States of America and is, and sid Alat drat was at all times hereinafter mentioned, engegred in a general banking busines tte Principal office and place of business in the City of Taladga, State of » Second, That on May 17th, 1918., the Chinnabee Valley Mills made ites » Payeble to the order of Isbell National Bank, against the plaintiff ty Hosiery tg., Co,, for the sum of $149.96 That said draft was m the price of a certain shipment of) ) to plaintiff by said ’ to i ele A da A aca Chinnabee Valley Mills and the bill of lading for said shipment was attached to said draft, That said draft was on seid date purchased by intervener frop the Chinnabee Valley Mills for face value, less No discount and was for. warded by intervener with said bill of lading attached for presentment and payment by the Liberty Hosiery Mfg. So, throught the Commercial Nationa? | Bank of Statesville, N. C. Third; That on the 22nd day of May 1918., the Chinnabee NattamatxBank Valley Mills made its draft, payable to the order of | Isbell National Bank against the plaintiff Linerty Hosiery Mfg. Co., for the sum of $435.74. That said draft was mdde to cover the vrice of certain | yarns shipped to plaintiff by said Chinnabee Valley Mills and the bill of | lading for said shipment was attached to said draft, That said drart was, on said date purchased by ‘intervener from the Chinnabee Valley Mills for its face value, less No discount, and was forwareded by intervener with bell of alding attached for presentment and payment By the Liberty Hostery Mfg. Co. through the Commercial National Bank of Statesville, N. C. Fourth; That on June lst. 1918., the Chinabee Valley Mills made its draft payable to the offder of the Isbell National Bank,: against plaintiff Liberty Hosiery Mfg., Co., for the sum of $138.47. That said dra ft was made to cover the price of certain yarns shipped to plainftiff by the Chinnabee Valley Mills and the nill of lading for said shinment was attached to said draft, | That said draft was on said date purchased by intervener from: the Chinnabee Calley Mills for the face value less No discount and was forwarded by intervener for presentment and payment by Liberty Hoster MEE. Co,, through the First National Bank of Statesville, N. C, | Fifth; That the plainfiff, Liberty Hosiery Mfg., Co., sometime after the arrival and presentment of said drafts, as intervener is informed and| believes paid each of said drafts in full to ths banks to which same had pen forwareded bu intervener and thereupon received the bill. of ladings coon the shipments of yarnes covered by said drafts and later presented said billé of lading to the common carier therupon received, and now has, the yarns the peice of which was repreented oBy the drafts aforesaid, That intervener is advised and believes that, having purchased the drafts aforesaid with the bills of Mading for each of said shipments of yarns attached as aforesaid said yarns as well as said drafts becme the property of intervener untill paid for by the plaintiff, Linerty Hosiery Mfg. So,, and that the funds anf” proceeds of said drafts received by the Commercial National Bank and First)” National Bank of Statesville N, C as sforesaid became and are the s o1¢ anf absolute property of intervener and it is entittled to the possession and payment of said funds byreason of its ownership of the drafts and yarns aforesaid. That said funds have been attached by the Liberty Hosiery Mfg. Co., in this proceeding as the property of defendant the Chinnat | valley Mills as interveners is advised and believe,, WHEREFORE? interveners demands that it be declared the owner and entitled to the said funds, to wit; the sum of $724.17 and interest Risieon: as , damage, from the date the same were attached, by plaintiff, to wit; June pe : , & 1918., untill paid, and for its costs and such other relief as may be just and proper. H. P,. Grier “~Kttorney Tor Ttervener, State of Alabama City of Talladega W. G. Boynton, being duly sworn deposes and says that he is an officer of the Isbell National Bank of Talladega Alabama to wit; the President and that he is authorized to make this affidavit for aand in its behalf; that he has read the foregoind affidavit and that the same is true of his own know- ledge, except as to those matters and things thereinstated von information and belief and as to these he believes it to be true, W. H. Boyton, (Notary Seal) Subscribed and sworn to before me the undersigned Notary Publiic Talledaga, County Alabama this the llth. day of October 1918, Jas. H, Ive ra VY Notary Public, kK aek 4h LIBERTY HOSIERY MFG .CO.3 Vs. CHINNABEE VALLEY MILLS, i ae a INTERPLEA OF ISBELL NATIONAL BANK OF TALLEDAGA. Service of the within affidavit is accepted and receipt of a copy of same acknowledged, This Oct, 14th, 1918. Dorman Thompson ; Attty for Libérty Hosléery Wire. Co. North Carolina,} Superior Court, Tredell County, | October Term 1918, ".P.WeLain, Walter McLain Stockholders in } Sefendant Company in behalf of themselves } and ¢reditors who may join herein, ' vs, ‘ Wigs uetatn Supply cnn ' | This cause coming on to heer upon notice to its defendent Company to Show and 7 ad fy ie x Cause why a permament receiver should not be appointed for said Company > cause having been showned: It is therefore cosidered, ordered end sagutee “ged that Dorman Thompsonwas appointed temporary receiver of said, be and he | bY appointed permament receiver of the said defendant Willer-NoTein Suppl company with free authority to settle the affairs of said corporation as provided by Statues That the creditors of said corporation shall have until the Second (2,1 day of December 1918, within which to present and make proof to said receiver of their respective claims against said corporation; Said receiver shall develabtteo to the creditors of the order by publication of the same in the Lendmerk, a newspaper published in Iredell county, N.C. for three (3) succesive weeks, It is further ordered that the notice of the peziancy of this action be given to all stockholders creditors, dealers & others interested in the affairs of said corporation, by publication a copy of the summons weekly for three successive weeks in the Landmark a newspaper printed in Iredell county as provided by Bec. 1199 of the Revisal of 1905: This cause retained for further orders, "BLP, Long || ze Upon the call of the summons docket at this term, it is ordered that plaintiffs shall have 30 days in which to file complaints, dating from the last day of the term, and defendents ellowed 30 days thereafter in which to demur or answer, except where some special order is otherwise made and in cases wherein judgments by cefault are taken for cause shire in open court, Hite wm won na aw ow tet yt No, 43 State VS. Assault and Battery on 0.L.Woodside Will Gibson, eee i é } ' ‘ ° Ho, 44 ' For resisting 0.L.Woodside, the duly appointed and t j t State constituted deputy Sheriff of Iredell county, end VS, resisting arrest, Will Gibson At this term of @muxt Superior Court of Iredell county the defendent Plead guilty to two several charges above set out, It was made to appear to the Court that there was s@me doubt as to the mental condition of this defendent, The Court is satisfied from inquires made that at the time he was mentally unbelanced and dangerous to be at large. His grandfather is reputed ‘eo be his Sitka. He was eruvioved at a recent term of this Court for rocking _ , enger train and sent to the State prison for twelve months, There are now pend against him other cases on the criminal docket, one for house breaking for Larceny, Court deferred trial as to the two foregoing cherges, and 1 be hereafter’ ascertained whether, of not, he is cspable of being ta al. 0 The ‘sentence of the Court now is that this prisoner be committed . +s Pie hospitel for the dangerously insane, and that he be confined therein y rules and regulations prescribed by the Board of directors until such + the authorities shall give an opinion that he is fit to be put on trial fon the several indictments pending. He is committed to the High Sheriff of rei county to be delivered to the said hospital, and the Sheriff is directed to deliver this order km of the Court to the said hospital authorities at ¢ time he delivers the prisoner. No. 47 State Veo Raymond Hennery No 48, State VB. Tom Pikens Noe 50. State Vs. Marshall Hudson, No. 514 State V8. Charlie Bell Woods. No,52- State V8e Richard Clark, Noe le State VSe J.H Williams ,Alias, JoH.Wilson,. Noe 9 State V6. Rush Nicholson, Noe 3 State Vee Raleigh Miller John Abb Allison, No, 4 _ ea pikeien Miller. No. 5 State Va. Searla Davis Jim McCarter, h i § it-ts ordePed<by* 33. Courtathat he pay into the } Larceny & Receiving. Salen Seer through “his Coun@Ql waives bill snk’ g pl ds guilty, whereupon Court the sum of $25.00 and that he be recognized in the sum of $100.00 to appear here at the next term of Court! Larceny & Receiving; ‘Bond fixed at $100.00 to be approved by the Clerk, Secret assault; j Defendent enters plea of guilty for tempoary larceny of a horse, The sentence of the Court is thet he county; To pay $10.00 to go to Frank Foulkner and the cost of this action. Assault & battery, Bond fixed at $300.00 to be approved by the Clerk, Defendent by his Counsel, W.D.Turner, weives bir }and pleads guilty. Upon motion of the Solicitor t motion for judgment is continued upon the paymen the cost, and he is required to appear at the next criminal term and show his good behavior and sbide the judgment of the court, $100,00 appearance bo sufficient, ; } Fogery;>;Abias Capias, AlWeD. Wopkates Capias, A.W.D.W. Continued, Retailing, Contimed under former cone Vy ; t t t i 4 { § 5 i ? 4 | murder, Alias Capias, a fine of $40.00 to go to the School funds of Iredell bi Hoe be State Vase Bad heglier N@e Te State VSe | Jim Talford | Now Be | State % V8e ‘W.H. McCarter | Nos Oe | State | V8. ‘Robt. Jones ‘Now 10. ‘State | V8e D.V.Steele ‘Noe lle iState VS.6 ‘Thunkhill Banks ‘Silas Harris, No. 12. ‘State | VB. Rosie Knox Tom Knox ‘Lee Knox 2 ‘Ella Knox No. 13, ‘State | Vee Walter Gaither Minnie Pool No. 14, State | Vs. Fred Caldwell No. 18% State v8, peer Reddick — O- 16, tate Vs. Roger Gaither Me 17s State Vs, : on Brown,Alias, heoige Bennett, NO, 18 State 8 Ruby Smith J @ 19, State Vs, +L, Tucker « 20, state Va, yames Carlton, 175 { Larceny. : { Called by Sheriff---Sci Fa and Capiss to issue unless i bond is renewed and approved by the Clerk in 30: days, : House breaking and Larceny, { Alias Capias. t { Retailing. § Called by Sheriff---Sei Fa and Capias to issue unless ' bond is renewed and approved by the Clerk in 30 days, : Rehnaa. ' Alles Capias, forging check, ” a : Alias Capias, ) { j Larceny, Alias Capias. ; Larcenye Alias Capias, Pornification & Adultry. Nol. Pros with leave, Larceny Alias Cepias, Abandonment, Alias Capias, Abandonment, Continued. Alias Capias, Dew. Alias Capias to Mecklenburg, > es _ ~@ Retailing, Called by Sheriff--- Alias Capias. eee |e EE ee eee ee ee oe : é REAR rece A.W.D.¥. aid Capias,. No. 21. Stabe Vs C.C.Harpe No. 22.4 State Vs Watt Kerr Noe 236 State Vs A, Karusus Now 24.6 State V8. Jase W.Brown Noe 25-6 State Vs Jas W.Brown No.26. State Vs Geo, Dulin No. 27 State Vs Dusty Brandon No, 28 State Vs. : Fete Ladd No. 29 State Vs L.F. Ladd Noe 30 State Va Burley Myers Flake Holland No. 31 State Vs W.Y.Westmoreland L.W.Westmoreland No, 32 State V8. R.C,.Grant NOs 33 | State | Ve ' Hervey Lee Houston Noe 34 State False Pretense, Aliss Capias, gee Abandonment, 30 days to renew his pond . Injury To Property, Called by Sheriff--- Sci Fa and Capias to issue unless. bond is renewed and approved by the Clerk in 50 days. Worthless Checks, James W.Brown -- Called and failed-~ judgment. Nisi Alias Capias,. Worthless Checks, Continued, Relist. Prgétense,30 days to renew bond. A.W.D.W., Called by Sheriff-- Sci’ Pa and Capias to issue unless bond is renewed and approved by the Clerk in 30 days. A.W.D.¥. . Bond renewed, Continued, A.¥.D.W. Bond renewed, Continued, Keeping Liquor for sale. Alias capias., Bond as to Burley Myers. A.W.D.W. C ‘ j Sei Fa and “apias to issue, unless bond given in 30 W.Y.Westmoreland renewed bond, . Non«-Support, { Lancer & Receiving. Alias Capias, * ° Alies Capias, A.W.D.¥. Continued, . Called by Sheriff--- Set Fa and Capies to issue unleit bond is renewed and approved by the Clerk in 50 deySe) Noe 36 State Ve Dusty Brandon No. 357 State Vs \M.S,.Campbell ‘No, 38 ‘State | Vs Son Privett Henry McDaniels ‘No. 39 State | Vs Fair Bowles No, 40 State | Vs A.Karusus No. 41 State Vs A. Karusus No, 42 State | Ve Robert Woodward ' : § . ' A.W.D.W. Continued, ' A.W.D.¥. Alias Capias, t § . Affray. Alias Capieas, § { . } Abandonment, Alias Captas, 4 4 ' { Injury to personal property, ae } Continued, t 4 j esta to personal property. Continued, } Manufacturing Liquor. pag ' Alias Capias to Iredell, Yadkin and Davie, and : i such other counties anywhere where he may be found, (3. keg: 1 7 ews wmes ewig! / . October Term 1918, TUESDAY OCT. 16th. 1918, NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY. OCT. TERM, 1918. S,.M.Goodman ! vs. { F,H.Wallace, J.J.Wallece, {f{ R.V.Wallace and Jim Wallace.} This cause coming to be heard before his Honor Benjamin F, Long, Judge presiding, and it appearing to the court that the summons in this ac ton wes duly served on the defendents more theah ten days prior to the beginning of this term and that the complaint was duly verified and filed on the Sth, day of August, 1918, and that the plaintiff's cause of action is founded ups upon contract under seal, and the sum demanded was fixed by the term of the contract and capable of being ascertained therefrom by computation, the same being for a judgment for a debt as evidence by several nites executed by the defendent, F,H.Wallace and secured by & mortgage executed by F.H. ° Wallace and R.V.Wallace and Jim Wallace and J,J.Wallace, and to foreclose the defendent's equity of redemption in the lands described in the sortie and the complaint aforesaid, and 4t further appearing to the Court, that F.H,.Wallace,,R.V.Wallace, J.J,Wallace and Jim Wallace have failed to answer said complaint and it further appeering to the court ‘that the Plaintiff has no cause of action against the Defendent: Mrs, Nancy E, Byers and desire to take a voluntary non-suit as to her, It 1s therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the actdon against Mrs, Nancy E.Byers be in the same as hereby dimissed and the cost. of the action against this defendent be taxed against the Plaintiff; it ‘ further ordered and adjudged that: the Plaintiff recover judgment against the Defendent F.H.Wallace, R.V.Wallace, J,J,Wallace and Jim Wallace by default for want of an answer; it is further ordered and agjudged that the Plaintiff recover of the Defendents Wallace the sum of $e@B.20 with interest from the 14th. day of October 1916 until paid and that the cost 4 action except the cost against Mrs, Nancy E,Byers which the Plaintiff shall pay be taxed against F.H.Wallace, R.V.Wallace, Jim Wallace and Jd Wallace by the Clerk; it is further considered, ordere and adjudged thet the judgment aforesaid be and the same as hereby declared a specifié Lien on the resl estate described in the complaint and the mortgage therein referred to; it is further considered and adjudged by the Court thet PR, Wallace, R.V.Wallace, J,J,Wallace and Jim Wallace equity of exemption in. the land described in said complaint be foreclosed, and that upon the failure of the Defendents to pay off and discharge said judgment @ cost of the action on or before the 14th day of November, 1918, | %.A.Bristol be and is hereby appointed a Commissioner and duly eutho ito sell said lands described in the complaint and mortgage as aforesaid at public auction to the highest bidder for cash at the Court House door in ‘Statesville, N.C, after advertising 50 days in some newspaper published lin Iredell County and report his proceedings at the next term of Court, It is further ordered that S.M.Goodman be and is hereby allowed ito bid at such sale, and in the event that he becomes the highest and jbest bidder that title be made him for said property, B.F. Long, . anne Judge Presiding. NORTH CAROLINA30O INTHE SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY. OCT, TERM, 1918, S.M.Goodman 6 vs. 4 F,H.Wallace & i Mrs,Nancy E.Byers § | This cause coming on to be heard -before Judge B.F,.Long, at this term and it appearing that the Plaintiff has no cause of action against the defendent, Mrs,Nancy E.Byers and ask for no recovery against the said D efendent, tirs,.Nancy E,Byers, it is therefore ordered and decreed that the act ction against Mrs.,Nency-E,Byers be and the same is hereby dismised and ahé cost of the action against this Defendent be yazad against the Plaintiff by the Clerk of this Court, W.A.Bristol ,attorney for Plaintiff. Zeb.V, Y aE AANE taht neriny for Mrs.Nancy E.Byers, No.77 $. M, Goodman 4 Ys. {. JUDGMENT, F.H.Wallace, § In this case the Plaintiff submits to & voluntary non-suit against the def endent, Mrs, Nancy Byers, and judgment of non-suit is seneeTEnE. Sietered and for cost, as to this Defendent, : ime to file pleadings under the general order is allowed both Parties, and case is continued, B.F, Long, Judge Presiding. Ce eure 3 Ds AL rs A Ag yy <7 OCTOBER TERM 1918, NORTH CAROLINA, § In the Superior Court, ° { . IREDELL COUNTY. | before the Judge. No. 67. State VS. A.F, Hester. The defendent A.F,Hester by his counsel appears in the court at the regular term of Iredell Superior Court and waives bill of indictment and to the char of the State against him of having in his posssesion spiritous liquors in | quantities forbidden by law. He pleads guilty. | The following named ten men was given by the Defendent: | Burton a Massey, Clark Slanes, Frank Massey, Dr.W.W.Finley, D.B.Hankins, Joe Hagens, | Dr. Slavenson, Mr.W.B8.Byers, Brade Batte and Mr.T.3.Hankens, NORTH CAROLINA, } IN THE XREREKXK SUPERIOR COURT ey IREDELL COUNTY. § Oct, term 1918, State VB.e A.F. Hester. : | This cause coming on to be heard and being. heard at this term, the | defendent, appears in court by counsel and pleads guilty to the charge of the| State of having in his posséssion more spiritous liquors than is allowed by | the laws of the State; to-wit, 10 gallons, and in person & by Counsel waives | a bill of indictment: | It was made to appear to the court thet the defendent was arrested in Statesville by the police on the night of the 21st. of Oct. 1918, and thet the police officers of Statesville at the time of the arrest of the defendent Seized the Automobile in which the def't was traveling & in which the said. liquor was found,& besides a small quantity of apples, beans & potatoes: It was also made to appear that the defendent its a Contractor in - Rock Hill, S.C., and has for a long time been regarded as a man of high pepwte® & a fine builder and contractor & has never been accused of violating the © liquor laws and that he claims to have gotten the liquor for himself and tem prominent men of Rock Hill, when lately on visit to Wilkes, and was returning to his home when arrested in Statesville, | It was also made to appear to the court that the 10 gallons of liquor and the Auto and other articles had been after seized, delivered by } . ue City authorities to the Sheriff of Iredell eg It is therefore considered and adjudged, thi defendent Hester pay — 11 the cost in this case to be taxed by the eal and a fine of $100,003; t is further ordered that the Sheriff of Iredell proceed to advertise and #11 the Automobile, egrooehiy to Chapter 197 of 1915, and apply the net ‘proceeds as provided in the said act; and as to the perishable articles of { /gmall value - to-wit: the beans, potatoes and apples he is ordered to rnin i | j | j j i | | j { ‘release and turn over the seme to the defendent Hester, | It is further ordered by the court that Sheriff Alexander’ turn over to Doctor McElwee, the Superentendent of health of Iredell County and Doctor T,E,Anderson food Administrator the 10 gallons of spirits now in k hée possession, to the end that the health authorities may examine the same and if it is found fit and useful to be used as a medicine only at this period, they may do so; but if found of no value, or detriment to the sick in this epidemic; then the Sheriff is ordered to pour out and destroy the said liquor, as required by the statute, udge Pres : —— j | | | | OCTOBER TERM 1918. ~ } | | deauagen as provided in the said act; and as to the perishable articles of PRIDAY Oct, 25th, 1918. / : y meigens /gmall value - to-wit: the beans, potatoes and apples he is ordered to rats t | 6 NORTH CAROLINA, § In the Superior Cour ’ | release and turn over the same to the defendent Hester, IREDELL COUNTY. § before the Judge. No. 67 | It 1s further ordered by the court that Sheriff Alexander’ turn ° e State over to Doctor McElwee, the Superentendent of health of Iredell County and VS. Doctor T.E.Anderson food Administrator the 10 gallons of spirits now ink A..F, Hester. Aa hés possession, to the end that the health authorities may examine the same The defendent A.F,Hester by his counsel appears in the court at the — and if it is féund fit and useful to be used as a medicine only at this term of Iredell Superior Court and. waives bill of indictment and to the charg period, they may do so; but if found of no value, or detriment to the sick of the State against him of having in his posssesion spirittous liquors in | '4n this epidemic; then the Sheriff is ordered to pour out and destroy the quantities forbidden by law. He pleads guilty. | said liquor, as required by the statute, The following named ten men was given by the Defendent: Burton 3? ae 6 - s B.F.Lo : Massey, Clark Slanes, Frank Massey, Dr.W.W.Finley, D.B.Hankins, Joe Hagens,’ | Judge Presiding. Dr. Slavenson, Mr.W.B.Byers, Brade Bette and Mr.T,.3.Hankens, NORTH CAROLINA, IN THE IRERXFKK SUPERIOR COURT IREDELL COUNTY, Oct, term 1918, State § 4 ( VS. 4 q 4 A..F. Hester. This cause coming on to be heard and being. heard at this term, the | dsfendent, appears in court by counsel and pleads guilty to the charge of the State of having in his possession more spiritous liquors than is allowed by the laws of the State; to-wit, 10 gallons, and in person & by Counsel waives a bill of indictment; It was made to appear to the court that the defendent was arrested in Statesville by the police on the night of the 21st. of Oct. 1918, and thet the police officers of Statesville at the time of the arrest of the defendent seized the Automobile in which the def't was traveling & in which the said. liquor was found,& besides a small quantity of apples, beans & potatoes: It was also made to appear that the defendent is a Contractor in - Rock Hill, S.C., and has for a long time been regarded as a man of high pepute® & a fine builder and contractor & has never been accused of violating the ~— a liquor laws and that he claims to have gotten the liquor for himself and ton prominent men of Rock Hill, when lately on visit to Wilkes, and was returning to his home when arrested in Statesville, | It was also made to appear to the court that the 10 gallons of Liquor and the Auto and other articles had been after seized, delivered by Me City authorities to the Sheriff of Iredell County, | It is therefore considered and adjudged id defendent Hester pay all the cost in this case to be taxed by the sia and a fine of $100,003 It is further ordered that the Sheriff of Iredell proceed to advertise and 11 the Automobile, agreeably to Chapter 197 of 1916, and apply the net. State of ree | Superior Seurt Special Term, Jredell County.. 4 Dec. 3ist 127°. J.A.Pain et al ' vs JUDGMENT | $ Mary Forney et al | This cause coming on to be head at this term of Court, before his | Henor E.W. Timberlake, Judge present and presiding unon the will of Iseec F, ‘Pain, dec'd and the admission of the parties respectively, and it having ‘peen admitted and agreed by the parties in open Court:- 1. That the Church and School room provided for in the 9th item of the will coulé@ not be built ofhewn stone, even by the application of the entire estate of testator thereto:- 2. That the cost of erecting a substantial ehurch and school jhouse of the dimentions mentioned in the will out of good wooden materials |roulé be thirteen hundred and fifty ($1350.00) dollars:- 5. That the cost of erecting the said building out of brick would be twenty-six hundred and fifty ($2650.00) Dellars:- 4, That the whole value of the estate available ie and consti- tuting what is called in the will the" General Fund” amounts te four thousand ($4000.00) Dellars;- 5. That there is already upon the site of Marvin Church mentions mentioned a woode church edifice used for the purpose of church ministra- tion by thé Methodist Ephiscopal Church South and was at the time of testator's death; Now therefore upon consideration of the facts agreed above, and the admissions in the answer, and in further consideration of the will of _Iseac E,Paine, it is considered and adjudged by the Court:- That the provision of item 9 and 10 of the said will of Isaac E,. Paine are void and incable of execution by reason of the facts stated above and that all the property, real and personal devised and bequeathed in the | Said will for the purposes mentioned in the said item 9 and 10, revert te | and are the property of the plaintiffs in this action, as heirs sat law and | next of kin of the said Isaac E, Paine, aec'd:- It is further adjudged, that the defendent Mery Forney pay into the office of the Clerk Superior Court of Lincoln County, the funds in her hands belonging to said estete; and that she proceed to collect the outstanding notes and other evidences of debts and claims due the seid estate, and likewise pay the same into the Clerks: office; It is further ordered and decreed by the Court, ‘that the plate | ‘ona necessary charges of administering the said estate; It is further ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the Clerk ‘this Court publish in.some newspaper, published in Tincoln County for th days, a notice to any and all persons claiming to be heirs at law or next of} kin of the said Isaac E,Paine, dec'd to come in and make themselves parties to this action on or before the first day of the next term of this Court;. And it is further ordered and adjudged that the cost ef this actt, bs paid out of the " Generel Fund", mentioned in said will, That this cause be retained for further orders, E,W, Timberlake, Judge Presiding, Now the ruling and judgment of the Court, the defendent prays an. sppeal to Suprem# Court, notice waived, appeal granted, appeal bond fixed at twenty five Dollars, By consent the will of I.E, Paine, the records of the case, agreed facts and Judgment te constitue the case in appeal, ween ane Stem AN ETN ES North Carolina, In Supericr Court, r Lincoln es Fall Term 1901. J.A.Paine et a1, Plaintiff, 4 against j JUPGMENT, Mery Forney Exr. and others Defts,} The above entitled action coming on at this term of the Court te heard before His Honor W.A.Hoke, Judge Presiding upon an order of the Supreme Court remanding the cause for the purpose of ascertaining by the ve of a Jury on the finding of the Court by consent of the parties whether a church &vSchool building can be constructed of hewn stone of sufficient size and dimentions and suitable as to finish for fthetpurpose of Churchworship & Church School with the amount of the "General Fund and it havéng been sgre by the parties to this cause that such a church & school building cannet be constructed with the amount of the General Fund;- It is therefore found by the Court as a fact that « church & school building cannet be constructed of hewn stone of sufficient size and dimentione and suiteble as to finish : ‘tor the purposes of Church worship & ehhrok school with the amount of the | \Generai Fund, new, therefore, upon the facts agreed upon in the cause cast accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court of North Carelina at February Term 1901, It 1s ordered and adjudged by the Court that the peeviaiens bye Item mine (9) and ten (10) ef will of Isaac E, Payne dec'da are void and incapable of execution and that all the property both real and personal devised and bequeathed in the said will for the purposes mentioned in said items 9 & 10 said - too and all the _Preperty of the heirs e 7 if kin of the pata Inaac Brae dec! | North Carolina, | Lincoln County, } ‘ | | Selves parties pleintiff,- It ia further adjudged that the defendent Mary Forney pay inte the office of the Clerk ef the Superior Ceurt of Lincoln Counfy the funds in her handsas executor belonging to Said estate and that she proceed te collect the outstanding notes and other Claims and pay pay the proceeds ef thessame into the sforesaid Clerks office, It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court: That : we the plaintiffs recover of the defendents all the real estate and personal property in her hands and herein adjudged to belong to the heirs at law and distributees next of kin ef Isaac E. Payne, dec'd,- } It is further ordered and decreed by the Court that the plaintiffs be allowed te amend their complaint by inserting in the comelaint filed ey | | by filing a supplementary Complaint a demand for » distribution of the en property covering the next of kin of Isaec R, Payne,dec'd and alse a demand for a sale for the purposes Of petition of the land herein daenthd | ddjudgeddte belong to the heirs at law of said I,E,Payne Dec'd among the “heirs at law, Tt is further onddéeacby the Court that the heirs at law and next | of kin of Isaac &, Payne dec'd and other: than the Plaintiffs be made parties | defendents to this action unless they come in and voluntarily make themee? | [t is ordered that the cost of this action be paid out of the (Cenerai Fund mentioned in the will now in the hands of the defendent “Executrix Mary Forney, W. A. Hoke. ‘ia udge Tres Ngo "T2348 oe ee I, A.Nixon Clerk Superior Court of BALdcCoundgnts hereby certify that the foregoing are true copies of Judgments of the Superior Court of Lincoln Court, N.C, in the canecof J. A, Payne et al, Plaintiff ageinst Mary Forney, Executor of Isaac E,Payne et al Defendents as copied from Minute Decket Lincoln Superior Court, begun Nec, Slst. 1900 (See page 335) and also September Tera 1901, P.454,as Witness my hand and seal of said Court, This 25th day of June 1918, KcNixen.-- aman ek , Linceln County, N.C, JANUARY TERM. SUPERIOR COURT 1919, wexennes NOTICE OF POSTPONEMENT OF IREDELL SUPERIOR COURT #sncsus At a meeting of the Board | of Heaith called by Dr. McElwee at the suggestion of the Mayor, the following members were present: DrgMokarMeElnes County Chairman of the Boerd of Health, Dr. M.R.Adams, City Physician, J.A, Steele, Supt. of Public Tastruetion,. N.D, Tomlin, Cheirman of Coanty Commis- sioners of Iredell County, and L.B, Bristol, Mayor, City of Statesville, ; Upon the advice of the Doctors, it was thought wise to presen} .the Influenze situation, especially in the Rural disdricts of the County, at this time, te His Honor, Judge W.F.Harding, Their Suggestion was that owing to this situation, that Court be not held in Statesville this term, convening Monday, the 27th; and that the proceedings of this meeting be « telephoned and. followed by letter to His Honor, Judge W,F. Harding, ; Charlotte, and twat the same be published in the Landmark and Sentinel, There being no further business, the’ meeting adjourned, L.B,5ristol, Chairman of WMeeting, | North Carolina, In Superior Court. Iredell County, ; January Term 1919, It appearing from the attached copy of the Minutes of a meeting of the Board of Health of Iredell County, that GR WORLE de? prodadl y22"KeRE | dangerous to the public health to attempt to have the January Term 1919 of Tredeil Superior Court because of the prevailing epidemic of Influenze in | Iredell County, It is therefore ordered that the Sheriff of Iredell County convene Court on Mondey. Morning formaly: and then formaly adjurn the Court for the term, It ia further ordered that this order’ and the attached cepy be spread upon the Minutes of the Court as of Shevudepuary 1919 Term, vam eos aah ite weer ace 8 of the Fifteenth ne ekatetes. _ MONDAY, JANUARY 27th 1919, North Carolina, Iredell County, “ Be it remembered that @ Superior Court enn and held itn and for the County of Iredell on the Bth. Monday before the 1st monday in March, The Same being the 27th day of January, 1919, when and where His Honor SC Harding, No,2 State vs Rush Nicholson No.3 State vs Raleigh Miller John’ Ab Allison No.4 . State vs Raleigh Miller No, 5 State vs Scerla Davis Jim McCarter No.6 State VVSs Ed Hegler No.7 iin State vs Jim Talford No.8 State v8 W.H. McCarter No.9 State vs Rebert Jones no,.10 . Stete D.V.Steele No, 11 State vs Thornhill Banks Silas Harris No,12 State MONDAY? JANUARY TERM? 1919. A.W.D.W, Alias Captes, * A.W.D.W. Gantinuedias, eeme we ee > cere eat eG et ee « - Murder, Abkhag.Captas SG me rae ee Retailing. Continued to Oct, 1919, Larceny. Continued to Oct, 1919. House breaking and Covidien: situa pinta Retailing, Allas Capias, Retailing. Alias Capias, Forging Check, Nol Pros with leave, Larceny. Alias Capias, “9 ; eel Larceny. Nol Pros with leave, e i vs , pe Leda . No.15 State vs Reger Gaither No,16 State vs Son Brown,Alias George Bennett > No.17 State vs Roby Smith | 'No.18 State | ve iR.L. Tucker i | iNo.19 i State | vs James Carlton |No.20 State | V8 C,.C, Harpe \No.21 ‘State vs Watt Kerr i } { i i No,22 State vs A. Karusus No. 235 State vs Jas.W, Brown No.24 State vs No,25 State vs George Dulin No.28 State vs 6 Dusty Brandon W027 State * f © . Worthless Checks, as MONDAY, JANUARY TERM, 1919, : Abandonment, Retailing A.W.D.W, Fakse pretense, Abandonment, Defendent discharged, Alias Ceptas, 4 Alias Capias, Alias Capias, / Alias Captas, Alias Capias, ¢ Continued Injury to property. Nol Pros with leave, Worthless Checks, False Pretense, A.¥.D.W, A.¥, Dd, ¥. Called and faileé and ‘ Judgment Nici Sei Fa Capias, to renew bond, Continued, Continued, Continued, are. Yor Re > ?; ’ Tit MONDAY, JANUARY TERM, 1919. ; : . MONDAY, JANUARY TERM, 1919, io.28 = q Wo.41 oe [ | Stete . ji State : | ve A.W.D.W. Continued, 1 ve ontinued on.same bond. | L.F.Ladd ~ : pee 4 Tom Pickens eS 42 | Rosae aE 4 Beata ate ’ vs Keeping Liquor Alias Gaplas as to Flake Holland | Weeheli Eudeon Geores Seseult Continued on same bond, Burley Myers for sale, Continued as to Myers, i Flake Holland No e435 State ‘ No.30 | | : vs Continued on same bond, State v8 A.W.D.W. Continued under bond, R.Eben Bennett W.Y¥.Westmoreland . L.W.Westmoreland No.44 State ; ; bine Larceny & Battery, ‘ state Richard Clerk . rye Continued on samé bond, vs Non-Support. Continued under bond. os R.C.Grant ‘ | No .45 ; | State as ; Law _ovs No.32 | : 4 | R.MeCurrent A.W.D.W. Continued on same bond, State vs § Larceny & Receiving. Alias Capias. Harvey Lee Houston § | | | NO.46 | State ‘ ‘ od | Vs . No Pes >} ; : . Mershall Pool Pte Capias e State vs A.W.D.W,. Alias Capias,. “ae Jim Gray 3 'No,47 | State : vs State ee ; | James Reav ' Alfas Capias, ae a Be - ' va Dusty Brandon /No.48 a, | State No a o5 ’ VE State Bo | /Tom Hend AcWDB se. Alias Capias,. i 1 ee Assault, Atixioxx Capias,. va Dusty Brandon , | No .49 ; State eels | vs a" a ‘Matthew wit ice Continued, : | ’ herspoon ) M.S.Campbell A.W.D.W. Continued, No.50 | 37 AP ee oe State ; | NO» : om vs | State ’ a q Herry Mott Continued, | ve Alias Capias, ‘ ; | Son Privett 4 Henry McDaniels eed Wo.51 State ; . | vs No,.38 : Otis Moone Petty Larceny, Continued, State Lia . er . . : va Abandonment, Continued on same bond. Fair Bowles te Wo .52 State é iis ea sini Too much Whiskey, Continued, vs No.59 i . er _ State Injury to personal Continued on same bomd, ee i ub HeLel land vs fnoperty. A. Karusus : No .53 No .40 . : vi MOS JS ee | | ee — Injury to personal Continued on same bond. _ ih Bi c, ‘Attempt to | ; No,54 State vs David Geither No ,55 | State va Charlie Carson No.56 State vs David L, Young No 257 State vs Will Lewis No.58 State va Will Eccles No.59 State vs Harrison Smith No,.60 State vs Harrison Smith Clate Deal No.61 State vs Jim Lee James No.62 State vs Burt Evans | Mo 663 | State | ve | Sherman Anderson No.64 | State | vs No, 65 State vs Lee Johnson No .64 State ve. _ | Raymond Henney Robert Woodward }. MONDAY, JAMDARY TERM, 1919, A.W.D.W, Violating Contract, Selling Whiskey, Lerceny, y Having too much Whiskey, Mfg. Liquor, * Alias Capias, Continued, Continued, Continued, ‘Defendent calleé and failed, Judgment Nici Sci Fa & Capias Defendeahits called and failed,’ Judgment Nici Sci Fa & Capias. Continued on same bond, Continued on same bond, Continued on same bond, Alias Capias, Continued on samé bond, Off at last Court, Wo.67 State vB Frank Mayhew No. 68 State vs Prenk Mayhew 7" Morrow, No.69 and 70 State | vs | Paul Hooper } |No.71 and 72 | State | vB | Jonas F, Johnson | No.7 | State vs |'Robie Moore | No,74 | State | vs /R.O,.Beaver Charlie James | No,77 | State } vs John Stevenson No.78 State vs Lon W,.Colvert No,79 State vs Don Borders Wo.80 State va Raymond Shaw, MONDAY, JANUARY TERM, 1919. A.W.0.W.& C.C.F, C.C.W.' & Boo much Liquor, Larceny. Larceny, Non-support, Too much Liquor, Pleads guilty. Four (4) Months to Roads or County Home, Frank Mayhew Pleads guilty, Six (6) months to roads or County Home, Nol Pros with leave as to Maude Morrow, Pleads guilty. Pen (10)months to roads or County Home, Continued on same bond, Continued, Pleads guilty. Prayer for cudgment continued, cw ee Continued, Continued under bond, Continued under bond, ne Continued under bond, Continued, Defendent plesds guilty of Suncast feesee® rateaan, huge foe st Gemyrating tonne GUE peymant OF MONDAY?, MAY 19th, 1919, North Carolina,| < IveddallCounty.§ Be it remenbered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County of Iredell on the Eleventh Monday after the First Monday of Merch, 1919, the same being the 19th day of May, 1919, when and where Wis Honor Judge W.F¥.Herding, is present and presiding, and Honorable, Solicitor present‘and prosecuting in the name of the State, M.P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: ‘ W.H.Moore, A.B.Richardson, J,P.Kennerly, R.L.Alexander, S.T. Goforth, R»L.Bradford, C.D.Crouch, W.W.Brown, C.C.Morrison, A.W.Bailey, J.P.Wilson, A.A.Cartner, M.A.Beaver, R.R.Goodnight, G.F,Neill, Herman Wallace, L.0.Whote, Jas,Sherrill, H.J.cook, N.C.Summers, J.W.Redman, C.S. Brown, R.C.Little, A.P.Sprinkle, John P,Hudson, H.D.Mills, W.F, Massey, A.D. Boggs, J.W.Cash, J.E.Pope, J.D.Lackey, 0. J.Sherr#l1l, ¥W.5.Campbell, R.E.Hill, J.F.Walters, and J.L.Harris,. Jurors for the term, es follows, to wit: H. b. Mille, J.#. Wilson, The following good end lewful men ere sworn as Grand herman Wallace, he Le bradford, lie b- Massey, A. LD. boggs, d. We Cash, de E. Pope, a. C. Little, J. «. Walters, nh. &. Hill, de i. kedman, ,C. T. brown, A. P. Sprinkle, W. Be Campbell, John P. Hudson, He Je Cook, As We Bailey. ie LD. Mills is sworn as foremen of the Grand Jury. Bs. P. Smith is sworn es otficer of the Grand Jury. Zhe following good and lewful men ere sowrn as petty jvrers for the first week of this court, to wit: M. 4. Beaver, S. 7. soforth, James Sherrill, MN. C. Summers, 0. Js Sherrill, k. n. Goodnight, de P. Kennerly, G. ». Neill, 4. A. Certner, R. Le Alexander, L. 0, White, C. &, Morrison, % N. Brown, J. D. Lackey, 4. B. sicherdson, W. He MBore, C% Db. Grouch. : Pa w “©. (de Pe Kennerly is excused for the term. MONDAY, MAY 197H., 1919. Error és Alias Gapias Nol pros with lieve. uv Alias Capias Alies Capnias Alias Capies Nol pros with lieve. ar Alies Capiae. Alies Capies Continued under former order Alias Caepias : Henry McDaniels called and failed. ducgment nisi gqiife. Capies as to Henry licDaniels. 4lies Capies as to Son Privette. iol pros with lieve. V iol pros with lieve u stete Consolidated. Vs Hate Ladd, #rank Ladd thie Se Campbell . State Having liquor in possession tor sele. The Vs. defendents weive bill and pleed not gvilty of Hd. Ce Morris having liquor in possession tor sale, but Arthur bwiggins guilty, of heving more liquor in possession John Steelemen than the lew allows. Ben Sides. eudgement of the Court is that-K, C. Morrie, John Steelman and Ben Sides each pay a fine of $ end one-fourth of the cost, end that judgment is suspended upon peyment of one-fourtg the cost es to Arthur Dwiggins. No. 59. State | Too much liquor. Prayer for judgment Vs. J continveé forttwo years on payment of Sherman Anderson. |] cost end good bebsvior. State JLefendent waives bill and pleads guilty of Vs. Iforcible trespess. On recommendation of Sherman Anderson Ithe Solicitor, it is ordered that defendant pay e fine of $200 and the costs. “0. 69. State and Beuleh Sharpe! Seduction. Defendant waives bill : Vs. end submits for bastare. vudement that Eugene Little. the defendant nosy into Court the sum of +060.00, ont of which the cost of the case up to the beginning of this term to be deducted from said amount end the balance paid to beulah Sharpe for herself and child end balance of — cost to be paié by defendant. } } J I J I I I eee ee ge MONDAY, MAY 19th., 1919. No. 98 State Ve. Azel lickens vim Williams Laura Williams. No. 96 Stete Vs Grover Smith. No. 100. State V3 Grover Smith No. 46. State Vs tarry Mott Joe Grier State Vs Marshell Pool | Stete Vs Condy heavis James heavia. wtaete Vs hoby omith. State Vs he. O. Beaver Etate Vs Bert Evans State V8. David Gaither State Ve. David L. Young.] State Vs Cherli. Carson State Vs. Will Lewis State Vs. Gene Moore. do. 46. State Ve. 5 ] Aesavit @ith deadly weapon. J Plea guilty. ] Judgment suspended on the payment J I J} Ce Oe We J] Deferdert pleads guilty. J bined $60 end costs. | Defendant waives bill and pleads guilty, Preyer tor judgment continued for two years J upon peyment of cost and good behavior: Harry Mott pleads guilty. Assault with deadly weepon. Defendant pleadg| — guilty. Fine of $26 and cost. Iifts I,bleads guilty of forcible trespass. Prayer for — I judgment continued for two years to sppear J} at the Janvery end Avgust terms of each year } and show good behavior. | Assault with deadly weapon. Defendant, plesds ) guilty. Judgment suspended onrppayment of cost; Lerceny. j J Preyer for judgment. Continved for two year J upon good behavior. J J I CG. Be We Pleads guilty. tine of $50 and costs. ] Assevlt with deadly weapon. Continued, J Assault with deadly weapon. Pleads ] guilty. Fine of $50 and cost. Affray. Plesds guilty. Kineé $10 } Assevult with deadly weapon. Continue 4 Larceny Pleads srt tT bined $80 and cogt. | Asseult with desdly weapon. Continued, whe, TUESDAY, MAY 20TH, 1919, No. 92 State Jésseult with deadly weapon. Ve J Prayer for judgment. LelieiHarris | Continued. Plea guilty. No. 99 State } Zoo much liquor. Vs J] Plea guilty. F. He brown J] Judgment suepended upon payment of cost. ¥. L. Hendren} No. 76 State } Having liquor contrary to lew. Plea of Vs. I guilty as to &. de vain. Plee oi not Beside Cain. | guilty es to Cherlie Allison. Nol pros Charlie Allison. J with Lieve es to Uharlie Allison No. 67 State Vs John Stevenson Having ligror contrery to lew. Plee guilty. 79 Stete J Having liquor contrary to Ve J duégment suspended. Will Morrigon J 76 State J Having liquor contrary to law. Plea Vs J Judgment suspended. Pirks Warren. | 56 State U. we W. Ve Called and feiled. Herrison Smith Judgment nisi sci te end caepias. Oo. 56 State Having liqvor contrary to law. Vs Herrison Emith called end failed. Herrison Smith Judgment nisi sci fe and cepies. Clete Deal Plea of guilty.es to Clate Leal end Wade Wade Deel Deel of receiving. Defencante to pay fine . of $25 each. M&H%- State Having liquor contrary to law. Vs befendent pleads guilty of receiving. Lee Plyler State Agsoult with deadly weepon. Ve Plea guilty. Warry Mott Judgment suspended on peyment of cost. Joe Seaar. Defendant Mott to pay two-thirds of the cost and Greer one-third of the cost. No. 26 JW. Y. Westmoreland celled an¢c feiled. Vs JJudgment nisi eci fe and caplas. W. Ys Westmoreland {Defendant L. W. Westmoreland pleeds guilty. L. W. Weetmorele nd. | . Wdonsolidated) “82, 29, 30, oa No. g2 State ] Aseault with deadly weapon Dusty Brendon : a ; | Agasult with deadly weapon . * foils p MONDAY, MAY 20TH., 1919. Crouch, J+ N. Rupord, 4+ As Cartner, F. H. Goodin, home Stike- Ce Le opengl ak iat for their verdict sey ere tind the defendants, sin Grey epee arate ObhaBe anby.oF Ser SAE 1S nd SE Ga ReEp BAS PEBe n oF Reel ty te Bre REeB nh bmB" No. 24 State J Abandonment. Vs | Pleas guilty. Fair Bowles! Judgment suspended upon payment of cost. No. : tate J Arson — ’ ve ] Defendant called and fsiled. Joseph Hamoy] dudguent nisi sci fe and capias. Continued. Carrying concealed weapon. fide be hyped achige? Having liquor contrary to law. Flea be 6 of receiving. dive fe Carrying concealed weapon. Plec guilty. bined ¢75 and costs. Upon the sheriff pas pistol broken soc it cennot he ed egein the fine msy be reduced to $50. lio. 62. State Vs vones B. Johnson. ee WNOe 62 otete Vs Jonas F. Johnson cote er ee No. 61. Stete Vs Lee Johnston No. 68. State | Secret assault Vs ] Plee not guilty. Marshall Hudson | The following jury: L. 0. White, J. 4. Sherrill, M. &. beaver, Te uworrison, Ae be Richardson, G. «. Niell, KR. hk. Goodnight, J. D. Lackey, Ve we prown, Se 7. Goforth, ke. L. Alexander, 0. J. Sherrill, being sworn and emprneled for their verdict say they find the defendant F. Goouin, J. 4. Fulp, de ke Woodsides, C. UO. Morrison a WEDNESDAY, MAY 2187, 1919. No. 38. State | Secret essault. Vs I Plea not grilty. Mershell Hudson] trial continued over from yesterdsy with Nol pros. J same fury. No. 108 State j Carrying conceéled weapon. Vs } Plea guilty. Lawrence Swink. | sined $50.00 and cost. No. 104. Staté J Carrying concealed weapon. . ve J Plea grilty. Marshell Hudson | wsined $100 and cost. No. 57 State J Lerceny. Vs J Plea not prilty. Jim Lee James |} vury seme ss in No. 28. Veréict egvilty. I Sentence forr months in jeil, to be J worked on covnty hone ferm. No. 29. State ! Lereeny Vs ] Plea guilty. he Eben vennett J «ired g150.U0U and cost. io. 49. State J Attempt at rape. Vs | Continued. bud roster. | No. 48. Stete ] Heving liquor contrary to law. Vs ] Defendents pleed evilty of receiving. Henry bennett | Hut kicLelle nd. | , No. 64 State } Larceny Vs i Plea not euilty. hobie Moore J cury same +s in Dusty Brandon cese. \ verdict cuilty. He. 22 State Ve Will Gibson. } House breaking ené larceny. } befendant pleads not gilty. | Jury same €s in No. 28. J Verdict guilty. 74 State Defendant rnleeds guilty. Vs Will Gibson J Stete } Continved to October Term, 1919, Vs 1 defendent lie Campbell . ] bresking into store. I Plea guilty. io. 82 and No. 83 Goneolidated: State Ve ! Ren usenentsas liqor t D. Mi Burgees ! Plea not gvi of, si , Ee. EB, lane be : ‘tens ¢ eee THURSDAY MAY 22ND., 1919. : 919 No. 29 end J Issuing @ worthless check. THURSDAY MAY 22nd., 1 : No. 20, State | @he defendant moves the Court to quash ; Vs I the bill of indictment for reason that ; : , aia James * Brown. J the offence charged in the bill of No. 26 State } Having liquor contrary to lew. Plea guilty, | } indictment ig Se ast of the Legisleture eee Ve ] Prercr for judgment continued on payment of ee { within the exclusive end orginal : sa niet né £006 rior, end to. gt ond j eee. : Burley idyers cost a Ash to aotear at anit tay tect @. { jurisdiction of the Recorder's Court in | Flake Beltend. [su Obey ve hin BALA GAnaetee ; q } the town of Mooresville, ené not within T2v0 eRe Se GRle Cone ene : { the jurisdiction of the Superior Court. | J Motion denied and defendant excepts. ae : ry feo 2 ‘0 Ll ow jury. Ho. 111. Stage } Plee guilty of forcible tresspess. Adgnéget , | [ tle cheats all Vs @& J Flake Hollend pay fine of 4100 and one-half ’ ] Verdict not guilty. Burley Myers | the cost ané burly Myers a fine of $150.00 J bleke Hollend.J and one-hali the cost. No. 32 State J Fine reduced to $25.00 i Ve i Me SCempbell J fio. 85. State ) keteiling. A eee Vs J Pleé guilty. Ike Loupe. ] No. 54. State J Violating contract. Judgment suspended : mee Ve J upon payment of cost. | No. 88 Stete J Menufacturing liguor. Celled and feiled. wd if Will Ecoles | P Pay } Vs J Judgement nisi sci fe end eapies will Bell ] ‘ No. 60. State J Manufacturing liquor. Alieb capias V J and continued. DO. 97. state } Le wee valled anc feileé. q Sikerk Dostusce. | : Vs J eYdgnent nisi sci ie and capias. Fe) Lem tryaent ! ea hi tarris Eryant. | No. 66 State } Non support. aE Vs i Plea pvilty. Fs . Vrarlie vames | dudgment thet defendant be coniined in i WO. 91 State I waerceny J Jail tor twelve months and assigned to ty Ve J Alias Capies. } work on the roads of Mecklenburg county. tt vorn Teegve. } : 40. 27 end ‘ : eg " Mes 368. Cepias and continued No. 80 state L. end Rk. 9 : vs J lies Cépias. | wo. 108. Capias and continved. : 40m lickens i io. 109, Capies ané continued. . No. 68. State a concealed wearon. Plea not No. 110. Cepies and continued. Vs gvilty. - Lon ¥. Calvert | No. 112 Capias and continued. = The following jury: Ebbe Nisbet, Js Ae weherrill, Me. 4. beaver, Bo, 1328 Capies end continued. +e Oe Morrison, Ae be hicherdson, ce. i. huppord, ihe He. Goodnipht, Je De Lackey, W. We Brown, S. 7. Goforth aré k. Le 4lexander, being Sworn anc empeneled for their verdict sey they find the defendant not gvilty. a3 tee wee Mins T8i State } Judgment of the court is the defendant be Ve } confined in the Stete Prison for ten years No. € Will Gibeon. } at herd lebor. No. 61. ™~ | Carrying concesled weepon. Defendant 8 l_pré -cOnjined, in, ie Lee Johnson, |e bey yeo. aes PAs c Il of defendent end to iurni¢h e¢fendent food and J clothing end out of the €26 rer month to ( I fine of ¥50.00 end costa. So. 84 State Vs ! secret ss . The defendant pleads verland Hollend.] I guilty of"es it with deadly weapon, whie plea the solicitor sccepts, end pleeds mot giilty of secret essault. | Jud gment that the defends nt pey iiue of $200 and cost. No. 77. State } larceny. Plea guilty es to Herbert ksor ‘ dee } Nel pros as to Eyla lioore. Jué nt of erbert Koore I court thet the Gefendent be ¢onfine Evla Moore J , * fo. 101. State |’ Breaking jadl. Piles eulit Hn Herbert | suéguent. Prayer ise as capies 1 erbert Moore | at aay time the defeniant is found i CORR Te 3 Ps ee It is ordered thet’ J. £. Tharpe be paid by t dats eum of $2.00 expenses in locating Herve Moke he Commis i, lio. No. PRIDAY, MAY 23RD., 1919. 104. wists Pine reduced to 60.00 2 Mershell Hudson. } State JAssanlt with deadly weapon. Ve | Defendant pleads guilty. C. S. Hollend. | After hesring the evidence, it is ordered thet the defendsent, C. S. Holland, pay the cost of this action, and thet he be and is restraized from in wuny wey interfering with Martin Privette, his wife end children. Seid Martin Privette, his wife and children are restrained from interfering with him, though they are permitted to go and attend to their own business end not to interfere with the business of each other. The preyer for judgment is continued. . No. 22 and No. 29 State 4£sseult with deadly weapon. Preyer for judgment tontinued upon Vs payment of cost as to Iwsty brandon. Dusty Brandon Fine of $25.00 and cost as to Jim Gray. Jim Gray No. 39. State j Fine reduced to $100.00 Va ihe Bhen Bennett: ] No. 40. Stete } Ve J Called end failed Richard Clerk. | Noa of +44 State — VS. )J Not true billA. Yaar fr No. 27. Stete J on support. ve J Plee guilty. ke C. Grant. J Judgment is that the defendent be confined in jail for twelve months and is essigned to work on the public roads of iecklenburg county. It appeering to the Court thet the wife of the defendant and prosecuting witnees in this case now hes syphilis, heving cmtrected the same from her fhusbend, and thet she is uneble finencielly to pay for necessary medical treatment, it is therefore ordered by the Court thet the county ppysicien treat the wife and furnieh her the necessery remedies or procure the treatment of said wife by some reputeble physician, und it is further oréered thet the County of Iredell pey for seid treatment end medicine. Can gene- Fo months in jeil to be worked et County Home. lio. 47. State J Vs j Gene Moore ]} } Called end failed. Judgment nisi sci fe 1 and cepies. Will Eccles] State J Having liquor contrary to lew. Four Ve ] months in jail to be worked at County Jorn Stevenson} Home. State Vs. am Charlies Mclleely iol pros with lieve. ~— Jim McNeely William Lichee 207 FRIDAY, MAY 22RD., 1919. io. 70. State J Larceny. Vs J Six months in jeil to be worked on the Willis Gilbert | roads. wo. 76 State | Vs I Having liquor contrary to lew. E. ve Cain. } Fined $100.00 and cost and the horse and buggy to be sold and money appropriated to school fund, and that deferdant give a bond in 'the sum of $200.00 for his eppearance at each term of May Covrt for two years end show his good behavior. io, 82. State | Manufacturing liguor. Vs ' Judgment thet defendant be confined in jail ib. £. Burgess | No. 83 State } WMenuteacturing liquor. Vs J vudgment that defendant be contined in jail Lb. ie Burgess | six months to be worked at Covnty Homee io, 85, State I hetailing. ve | vudgmont thet the défendant be confined in th Ike Houpe. J county jail for six months to be worked at th J County Home dgpr~ - No. 88, State Having liquor contrery to lew. I Vs I rrayer jor judgment be continued upon peyment Lee Plyler. |} of cost. No 1/2 State | Called and failed. dJudgnent niei sei fe and Vs I caplas. Ce. S. Holland. | No. 46. State ) Having liquor contrary to law. ‘ _ Ve | Prayer for judgment .continued. for 2 yearssbef Hub McLellend | Hub MicLej2end and Henry bennett called end fal “enry bennett | Judgment nisi sci fe and capias. Nie. 67. State J Preyer tor Judgment continned upon payment of : Ve 1 cost. Lefendant called end feiled. dJvdgment orn Stevenson) niei sei fe and capias. ' // li y frening six months to be worked at County Home Yvews i ba. | Leds MONDAY, MAY 26TH., 1919, the Sheriff of the County returns into open Bourt ¢ ; of the following good end labtet men to serve cern gecond week of thie term, to wit: bet. Fisher, kK. UG. Moorefield J. lL. Bllig, &- ©. dJopneton, J. k. Bryant, L. i. Scott, E. E. Parker de He Sherrill, ds be Blleetr, +. L. btonestreet, J. «. MeKey. 8. D.- Hoger, d+ be Webb, U- OU. Harwel], oO. Ww. Kower, A. i. Gudger, J. ihe Winecoft, te Ae Cloyd, S. Ge. Blomen, W &. Slopn, b. otewert, a. Lentz, ue s+ Vass, 3. B. Loftin, CG. W. Hoover ic returned eas being sick end unable to ettend Court end is excused, ds L, Lentz [. be Cges, Ge 4. Loftin, are returned not being found. No. 2. dames Armetrong | ve j Evans srmstrong. | Continued. No. 3. Statesville Lumber Co. | ve I Continued ohn & Patton and D.i. Adame. / “aa lio. 37. Minnie Lyon | Vs | Conti nued. We be Lyon j No. #2. Maile Croes lois Mae 3 | | y4 Bal¥avee stat | OR PT OPH No. 40 1 /adeberty eo Leen — sancti bin. by e004 No. 46... ISAMen re Ww towbar, j J No, Bieber nd Rotiman Continued. Continued. J J No. 66.Wallr Mm.) Drips rata J Continued for pleintiif. Continved. io, 670) {tallsunby 1.8. eaMou io. 10, LEA Vwpybo " BA baage- ae Continued. a Ve Ae Evang } Vg I L. ©. Ualdwell) The following jury: LD. #. Wieher, kK. &. Moorefield, L. Fe Soott, 7° #& karker, Jd. Ke Sharrill, J. & MoeKey, J. &. Webb, 0. 0. Harwell, A. Wie Gudger, R. A. Cloyd, W. A. Watte, b. Stewart, being eworn and *apenneles for their verdict sey they find the isguoe evbmitted to them as follows, to wit: ethounty".® the @efendent indebted to the ple intiff and if so in whst Anewer: the amount “of aca. sundred “end Wonks five Aba tR te Pad 9 itty D° ame Seven cents ($226.67 it BK: sais ba = i et iis, eB in » Statesville, N.c. May, 22, 1919. The Grand Jury for May Term, 1919, Court begs leave to submit the following report: 4 Committee of fovr exemined the and Infirm, finding therein 36 inmates; white; 8 males ard 6 females, colored. emple and ccmmodious; the food provided Special attention is given the physical needs of the inform by a trained nurse, and the County Physician is very attentive to any need that my arise. We found the buildings well kept end in 6 sanitary condition. We found the farm in a very good state of culd County Home for the Aged 8 males and 14 females, Tre accomodations are abundant and well prepared, tivation and being improved by the sowing of clover, and the use of manure. A herd of cattle provide milk and batter, end asfficient hogs ere kept to svprly the larger part of the meet. The Jury examined the jailins body. We fmnd seven prisoners. The jail is well kept and appears clean end sanitary, The Jury recommends replacing the doors at either end of the outer enclosure of bérs,. on first and second floors doors, ¢0 as to protect the locks from prisoners on the inside. # also recommend the installation of screens in all the windows. & pile of tools, picks, etc., shovld be removed from the corridor on the first floor. The Jury examined the Court House in a body and fond the recorés in the offices of all the preserved. The floors in the vaults edjoining the officer of the Register end of the Clerk need minor repairs. between the fod It is now in bad we recomnend thet the floor in the basement, of stairs end the toilet, be laid in cement. condition. The Jury would esk thet the Presiding Judge enjoin our o ffic to be more vigilant in enféreing the state speed laws and the lew requiring the vze of dimmers on automobile lights. nespectfully submitted, (Signed) ke De. Mills, Foreman. of Iredell County Svuperigy , with eolid — County Officers well kept and nq ers TUESDAY, MAY 27TH,, 1919. oe renege a mts e der former order ued ue 6 er “i or order. Rot eg Miradi Von Sete C6ntinue a Apel Wall Wot ¥ li ROR FAP», Weg 00 . Os bon rent — First National of Statesville vs T. Foy White | No. 28. /Continued by consent | 6A, Sou, R.R.Co. v8 Queen Knitti ae No. $1 7 Cont inued by consen We iP McLain and C.W.McLain et al Oc 58 ./ Conti nued. | afer vs Chette Karusus | | vs Miller-McLain Supply Co. Continued. . Sher ts vs B,M.Wilhelm ) ye oer 3 / Poot niet for pleadings sfagkie e wn W.S.Alexander | SB. Taney ME Beta ‘ oN Lis “ John W.Williams vs Sou,R.R.Co. me. BLY A te Os pleadings’ ¥ 5: ease ations’ ae ots or pleadings. | No. 73 Dermott Shemwell J ay Vs J cet for Wednesdsy M. Pe. Alexander, Sheriff. | | Jghn BONE ht ereah ode Sugeno vs B.A.& L.L. Troutman, Partners, | Bo. 28. Southern rower Company J VSe Me. G. Williems and wife, | Anna Be Williams. J The following jury: D. +. Fisher, k. C. Morefield, S. L. | Hower, A. We. Gudger, J. &. licKay, BE. C. Jone on, Le be So Lott, ke EB. | Parker, Js Ge Sherrill, S. G. Sloan, W. A. Watts anc he Ae Cloyd being sworn and empeneled for their verdict say they find the issues submitted to them es follows: Wednesday, May £6th., 1919. : \ No. 23 Southern Power Company j Triel continued over from Vs J yesterday. Me Cs. Williams end J Anna be Williams. I Rh. Le. Maiden /| Ve. J A. #. Warris. | The following jury, We 4. lioore, J» 1. Thomes, 4. A. Harwell, We Os Moore, He A. Yount, Js ie Webb, T. Ge Wallece, J. F. Little, Js L. Bllis, Ben Stewart. J. he Winecoff and HL. ©. Wilson, being sworn end empeneled find the issuee cubhitted to them TEURSDAY, MAY 29TH. , ea Mo. 22 Southern Pome es THURSDAY, MAY 29TH,, 1919. No. 62. Continved lio. 41. " No. 71 : No. 70. . No. 69 . Nos. 29 and 30. " iO. 22. Southern Power Company ! Ve i: On Spiel. Jd ©. Moose and wife, N. &. Moose.) iio. 15. ise) ee a In the Superior Court, oe ee May Term, 1919. ] } This cause coming on to behesrd and teing heard at this Term of the Snperior Court of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, before his Honor, %. KF. Harding, Jucge presiding, end a jury, end the a ha ving enswered the issue submitted to them ty the Covrt as Ollows: "Is the defendant indebted to tre plaintiff end if so in what emount ?" Answer: "The Jury heve unen ilously decided that the pleintiff be raid the amount ot three hundret ($225.57) end twenty five dollars end fifty seven cents. D. te Fisher. It is therefore ordered end adjudged by the Court thet the Mleintiff, we a. Evans, recover of the defendant, Le U. Valdwell, the eum Of Three hundred end twenty five end 67/100 A pa 57) dollers, snd the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk "of the Court. (Signed) We #. darding, Judge Presiding. No. 9, North Caroling, | Superior Court Iredell County | May Term, 1919. ge Fe a nm, Jd- Mie Bineherdt end Rutledge Ve. Upper Codéle Greek Dreinage sel ? nt open. Cange comi Court ¢ ¢ontro nate ine e byt Sieh pay the coat to be taxed by the North Carolina |] Iredell County. |] No. & John 7. Motesty! Vs. Will Kangom ! this cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, and j appearing that all metters in controversy have been settled out of Court, i4t is, therefore, ordered and sdjudged that the cost be paid by In the Superior Court, May Tern, 1919. Judgment. pleintiif to be taxed by the Clerk. No. 193 North Caroline | In the Ireéell County] ve #. Harding, Judge Piesi Superior Court, lisy Term, 1919. be Me Turner, 4. lic Tyrner and J ¢ i. Turner, trading under firm ] Jud gment name of TI. EW Turner & Co. I | VS. I The Southern ssilway Compan 0 y pany This cause coming on to be heerd at this term of the Court before Eis donor, %. &. Harding, Judge tresiding, and it seppearing te the Court thet plaintiff and defendant heve settled the matters in controversy between them in this action vpon the Six and 25/100 (26.25) dollars by the defendant to the pleintiff, the defendant to pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of tis Court: It is, therefore,co the 19th. day of iiey 1919, 1 ‘ hie nsicered plaintiff recover of the defendent the action to be taxed by the Ulerk of the Court. (Si pmned) (Signed) W. bh. Ae Le Sterr, Attorney fox plaintiff BOs Bay North Caroline, | Iredell County. | Dr. the Le Gilmore ] Va | ‘ie We Davis. defendant £12.50, being the plaintiff for medical item of the account about October 1lst., 1914, br. Gilmore: My Dear Sir: mak ae ote 2 fort possi b Le ©. Caldwell, Atty. for Deft. This cence cOming on to be We #e Harding, Judge Pres idinp, between the parties to this action, end their res statement it is agreed shell constitute as follows: "This ie en ec br. to Davis asking peyment of this except on this Owens eccount, hereto attached» to the plaintiff: Inr ble to ding. derding, Judge Presiding. In the Superior Court dey Tern, 1919. Judgment. pon & steteme 7 te nae ne @ oO ieept, heard and bei was af o few days 4 one 4 1 péyment of the sum of Twenty- ra tdjudged by the Court that the sum of $26.25, with interest from paid, together with the costs of this ng heard by His Honor, nt of facts agreed upon pective attorneys, the case and which statemen tion brought by plaintiff to recover f one-helf of eccount due b services renéered, snd for whic to become security, which agreement wes n wae made on Sept. October Loth., 1914, The oral ba one Owen to defendant ag ot reduced to writin «,,1914, the agreement of security Gilmore from time to time sent st eccount. There was no claim age On’ Dec, 14th., 1916, Davis wrote | Mooresville, Ne C. Dea 1 Fate Fr Hens $12.50. On the trial defendant h. iW. Davis entered a general denial and properly plead the Stetute of Frauds and also the Statute of Limitetions. The Court decided agrinst the defendant ana in favor of the pleintiff. Defendant eppealed to thig Court, and it has been agreed between counsel that the above shell constitute the agreed facts in the cése and that the Court shall say s@ ea matter of lew whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover.” Upon the foregoing ogreed facts, and upon the lew the Court finds that theipleintiff is entitled to recover from the defendent the sum of $12.50, together with interest and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court: It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court thet Plaintiff recover from the defendant the sum of Twelve and 50/100 (12.50) Dollars with interest on said amount from May 16th., 1919, until paid, together with the costs of thig action to he texed by the Clerk of this Vourt. We t. Harding, Judge Presiding. SATURDAY, MAY 3lst., 1919. Ho. 25 1/2 North Caroline, ! In the Superior Court, Iredel] County | May Term, 1919. E. G. Gaither | : 2 \ ahi pf Vbl J ngs 4) VS. I JUDGMENT: (dQ dg, d é; - We Ae Moore J t This cause coming on for hearing upon the motion of the defendan j Term, 1916 to set aside e judgment heretotore rendered at tne d4ugust hy s of tris Court, She Gcurt finds the following facts from the effidavit;: FIRST: The summons was issued on February &th., 1916, served on the defendant Bebruary 9th., 1918, returnable to the May Tern, 1918, of Iredell Superior Court, which said May Term convened on the 20th. day of May, 1918.. That at the time the summons was : issued and affidavit wee filed by the plaintiff cleiming the possession of certain property therein described, snd the order from the Clerk of the Supreme Court for Claim and Delivery wes delivered to bap ae Sheriff ordéring him to seéze the property described in the affide énd hold the same according to lew. And thet said property on duly seized and afterwards delivered by the Sheriff to the plain ° That on the Claim and Delivery the Sheriff mekes the following return: "keceived at 10 o'clock Ae ile The 9th. day of February 1918, served at 10:20 o'clock A. lie the 9th. day of February 1918, by seizing and teking into my possession the property touavs ies therein, after reading the within Claim and Delivery to W. As Moore. cated 9th. of February 1918. ide Pe Alexander, per 0. Ll. woodsides, Deputy Sheriff." And on the following return of the summons "Ke- ceived Februery 9th., 1918, served February 9, 1918,teking into ag 4 possession the property described and reading tre within co. ° We 4s Moore, M. Pe Alexander, Sheriff, Iredell county. Theat the property seized by the Sheriff and delivered to the plaintiff is es follows: 150 mahele of corm, 1500 pounds of seed cotton, 20 gellons of molesses, 10 bushels of sweet potatoes, one mshel peanuts end 911 roughness, es rents dve from the Symmers farm, two miles west of Statesville, edjoining the State Farm and others. That the compla int was filed February 13th., 1918, duly verified. That no answer See eae been filed. ‘That ee was vonvened in aoe Courthouse in Statesville, the county seat of Iredell county, & term of the Superior Court on the £0th. day of May 1918, and the case wes continued without motion for Judgement by ie ve That the next term ofthe Superior Court of the said regulerly on the 20th. of & Plaintiff moved for judgme was rendered by the Oo ané the evidence and t After the Auevet Term, at whieh time the verdiet and ji denent was pondered aa above set out,the next tern #as in Votober 1916, which term regulerly convened, intervening the Avnet Term and the Vatober Tern, defendant gave the plaintiff nottos that ot the Ootober Sern he would move the Gourt te aet aside the judgment. Theat at the sald Ootober Term, the motiom wae lodred and covtinued and effidavit filed. ‘The next term of the Court ve gee ar to be hela after the Oateher Term wee in daniwry 1919, at whieh time on acoount of the prevelling @iseese of influente no Court wae hela exdept the proasedl ng whieh bela Geurt a few honre for the purpose of taking some submieasions on the oriminel elde of the doaket, Ne husiness woe treneacted on the aivil efde of the dooket, Theat thare hoe been no termof thie Oonrt remilarly held sinee Janvery wntt) thie tern. That ofter the Jentmry Tem thore wae no other term until the May Tem of 1919, et whieh time the motion cane on for heurtnete That the defendaht in thie osiee 41d not employ vouneel in thte gene until softer the rendition of the verdiot and Judgement Hhove wet out. ln addition to the foregoing faate the Gourt finda that the ol6im of the plalntitf ese inet the defendant ie for retitea nder & leaeo exeotted by vs | ninere to the defendient during the your 118, hia) ei louse Wan te aever the aorop for 1917, oid that the rent wun Giue [or Lhe Year LT, at whigh {tine pald Ve He wt mere whe fhe owner of the land tpon whigh aalad oroep was made, goverad hy the paid lease, That On tho seseeeessOmy Of Apeveat the bands vovered by eal d lease, ivltivated by the defend nt,were throveh the Vourt, vider @ partition proaeedinge, sold to the plaintiff. That sold bale was confirmed by the QUsurt and deed axecuted by the Vonmingsloner to the plaintiff on the Phth. day of Septenber, 1917, In whiogh @eed there isn no refeoraroe to the rontea. hat tn the advertisement of the Gerumiesloner to sell said land nothing wae sald shovr rente, en at the sale nothing wae seid esbout rente, and nothing eaeld sbow rente in the deed from Uomnigatoner to the plaintiff, That in the fall 6f the yoer 1917, when the rents hee inane due, plaintlt(t denmnded of the defendant rents for the yoar 1917, and weld We le Bunners H1e6 Aemmnded of the datfendant the rent for the yeer 1917, Theat upen the danand meade npon the defendant by the plaintill and the eatd Sunmere, defendant neat fied plaintiff 4nd Primerea thot he wae prepared and ready to pay the rents to who soever they belonged, thet he gould not pay both, and thet he would hold the rehte wntl] plaintiff end e614 Summers gould Ad just thelr Gifferences, That @9 the platntilf and the eald Summers hed not agreed, and no sation wae taken to seattle the mtter, the defendant had the gorn pathered and hauled bp to Kile heme and Bhucked, end oplled inna di einterested perty to sea the divielons Theat the defendant sold the cutten and cotton seed and denoetted one*third in the bank, keeping the sales tloket for evidence of the hnHount, to lave if in hend for the porty entitled to itt, and left one«third rowghness. That the pletntiff and said Bueme re took no aation to settle thelr dispute tintil tn relruary, wntid the setion wes Sonmenoed, a8 hareinbelore set out, Thet ot the Mey Term the @efendant attended said term, when he HAW Mie le Us Geldwell, whom he knew represented the eaiad Summers, and defendant wea informed by oa1d Galdwoll thet no judeirent wee sought ageinet him, and that nothing would he done againet defendants That waid le Use Galdwelld ie an attorney et law, and preatiaes regulerly in the eourts of Iredell sounty, end wae the attorney for We Ne Bummere, but was not attorney ibe the plaintiff. That efter the mturity of the orepe and the ons hosing o# the 6 vane, plaintiff mde ch@im to the defendant, Ws Ae Moore rente thereof, who refused te pay the rente to the ola int iff. Thet on Deoenber 17th., 1917, the plointiff mailed the defendant, and the defemant redeived in dve wourse the following letter: r the Wits We Ae Moore, Statesville, He Us lia Be De Dear 8) L notified you not to remove, divide or diapose of any pert of the arop on the Summers plege without iving me notiag, o11 of which you have viele ted, thie ie % notity oe that unless I have settionmnt of ny part 6 the rente, it will be neqeneary for me to take action for removing orope, oid for my interest in the same, Youre truly. i Court, Ne That on donwiry 10th., 1910, the plaintiff, m @ through the maile, of the United States the followin Gaither, mf lea @ letter; Statesville, Wed. Janteary 10th,, 1916, We Ae MOOTE iteteavilie, Wel, He Ba Ve Dear Mri You will pleese furnish mm with itemited statement of #11 @rope grown on the Sunmere flaee for 1917, Thanking you in edvance for prompt attention te the wetter. Yours troly." That the defendant 614 not reovive through the mai) the foregoing iettér, That the plaintiff requested of defendant h statement as to the aotton and corn that he had rataea, The defendant 414 not furnish the statement to the plaintiff, but tela him thet he wouldd get the ginner's atatenent ebout it, hat the corn vaised on the said plave remained ont in the weather from late fall wntil on or obout Februar Mths, 1918, 6nd 6180 & pert of the roughness on the seid farm, whieh by resaon thereof was damared and greatly redneed in vale. That the defendant bedaie solloitons about the sondition of the eorn,end cane to Steteaville and sew the Pood Administrator in repord to it, end abked the Food Administrator if he wonld not take possession of it, as the defendant had no plave to house it wntll the differences between the plaintiff and Bumnere could be adjusted, ¥rom the foregoing feaots, the QGourt te of the opinion that the defendant ta not pullty of exvupable nagleot, but te of the opinion that he hwe « meriterions defence, am refuses to wet the Judgnent seide upon the growhd that he te guilty of exensable Sontee’ The Osurt ta further of opinion, 68 & matter of law, thet the plaintiff a1a4 not heave the right to take Judement hy bDefeu lt and Inquiry at the Aupust verm, 1919, and at the sane term heve # jury inquire o8 to damages, therefore, sete the verdtot of the jwy @eide ans orders o new trial ve to the inquiry of damares, and refuses to set the judgment aside oe to Defanit and Inquir arn the plaintiff exeepts and tty 1o the maprene Slee waived in open Court. Appeal bond fired at $60. The foremoine findings of feats and agonolisionsa of law and degree shall oonstitute the Gese of Appenl. The Glark of the Ogurt will eertify the foregoing aa the vane On Apponl te the Supwene Court. GVensented and aereed te by parties in open Court, We He Varding, Judge Presiding SATURDAY, MAY 318T., 1919. No. 16; Mrs. & Ae Ferpington J S Walter\and Cra es Vanstory, et al. | suse the propounders move to/dismiss:the cavgat t the cavegtors haven't filled a bond Yor cysts as and that no-order permitting them to Yring is paupers has/been mede. Thé caveatorsd are eAlowed he end of this term in which to file bond @s required this on the fround t requirdd by law, action )n form of thirty faye from by law. irs. Je Ae kamington J Vs. I Order. Yalter and Charles Vanstory, et al | Fropovunders move to dicmiss the eaveat for thet the caveators heve failed to file bond us provided by statute. Lotion sllowed and if is ordered end eijrdged by the Vourt thet: thie: cause be and is hereby dismissed for the failure to file bond. No. 64: (CRIMINAL DOCKET) wtate Va. Koby Moore: | # Order. it is ordered and edjpdged that the defendent be confined at the Jack son trehoin & School, there to romelp vgati] discharged gecording to law. It ie further ordered thet t efendant shall be diseherged fro custody until the Clerk of this Court Bhall be notified thataae.. Jackson Training School cgm receive the defendant. Upon the eipt of such notice the Clerk is ordered to issue e cepius to the Sheriff forthe arrest of the defendant, to the end that he be conducted to the Jackson Training School. Order Na. 80, (CRIMINAL DOCKET) otete j VS. { D. Me Burgecs. Let the defendant be confined in the county jail for a term of six months, to be essigned to the @ounty Home Farm. Sentence in this cese to begin on Monday Novembey. 17, 1919. If the defendant srell on seic date fail to surrender h&mBeli #o the Sheriff of Iredell County to be conducted to the Countygmeme Farm, for the purvoge of cerrying oy this sentence, thé Clerk of QR@gmrt ic directed forthwith to issue coplee to the Sheriff for higmet, to the end that this sentence mey be enforced. oth illo...+.(Crimineal Decket) State ! Ve. Re Ce Grant. j Order it is ordered thet the defendmt be relessed from custody, t capias to issue to the sheriff of Iredell county or ony other sherif in North Carolina for the errest of the defeniant to the end that this sentence may be carried ovt in the discretion of the Clerk. Hetohants and Vermers Bank of Mooreeville | 4 8. der. be 4. beam end wife, Le 4. Beam. ving It appearing to the Court that since the judgment by default finally rendered in this ceuse has been signed, that the defendent, in apt time, has come into Court and filed anianswer. It is order the Juégment heretofore rendered be and the same ie hereby stricke t 4 . : es tee BLastyshe Jury mving fount. 03] ine, teeusn, tn saver. of North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Term, 1919. John Bleck I! vr we ) ISSUEs, Lydia Bleck | (1) Lid pleintiff end defendant marry as alleged? Answer: Yes. (2) Did defendant comnit adultery ee alleged? Answer: Yee. (3) Hes plaintiif been a resident of the state for more than two years betore the beginning of this action? Answer: Yes. (4) Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apert from each other for more tran ten years? Answer: Yes. Jorth Carolina, Superior Court, lredell County. hiay Term, 1919. John Black | Vs I Judgment. Lydia black J This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, Harding, Judge anc a gury, and being hecrd end vpon the whole record in the cavse the Jury having found the igsues in favor of the pleintiff: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of mtrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved and the pleintiff declared free and discharged from any ané all liebility becemse of the marriage in said cause. (Signed) Wes. Harding, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, Superior Court Iredell County. Mey Tern, 1919. Albert Hobson / Vs J Issues. waggie Hobson | (1) Did plaintiff and defendent merry as alleged? Answer: Yes. (2) Dia defendant commit adultery as alleged? Anewer: Yes. (3) Wes pleintiff been a resident of the Stete for more than p . two-years before the commencement of this action? 4 Answer: Yeg. 7 North Caroline, J Superior Court Iredell County. ] May Tern, 1918 gic Hobson | & I Maggie Hobson Jud gme nt . This cause coming on to be heerd et thie tem of the Court end being heard before Hie Honor, Harding, Judge,end It te therefore considered @ the bonés of metrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be sand the same ere hereby dissolved, W. #. Herdin ; Judge Presiding. No. 36. North Carolina, | In the Superior Court Iredell] County. | May Term, 1919. We ide Lundy I Vee i Je Se Moore and Company, ] je Se Moore and O. fT. Leonerd) Judgment. This cause coming on to be heard at the Mey Tern, 1919, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, W. #. Harding, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the defendants, J.« S.- Moore and Company, and de S. Moore, by leave of the Court withdrew the answer heretofore filed; end it appesring further that the defendant, U. T. Leonsrd, has never filed un answer in this cause; and it sppearing further that the summons in this cause wes served on the defendants on the 19th. day of July, 1918, and was returnable to the July Term, 1918, of the Superior Court of Iredeil County, and it sppearing further thet the cause of action is based on two notes under seal executed by the defendants to the plaintiff, and it appearing further to the Court that the complsint: in this action is verified and thet same wes filed on the 30th. dey of July, 1918: It is therefore, considered, ordered and edjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the om of Six Hundred Dollers, together with interest on $350.00 from the 18th. day of September 1917, until paid, and interest on $250.00 from the 19th. day of November, 1917, until peid and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. We De Har di ng Judge Presiding. “orth Caroline / lredell County. | In the Superior Court . . liay Tern, 1919. fleishman, Morris & Company, ®& corporation Vs. “e & Brown, Clarence brown, B. #. Cornelius, Me We Sherrill, Te C. Sherrill, ke. &. Gabriel end Ge We Moss, pertners trading and doing business under the firm name and style of Brown- Cornelius «& Company. Judgment. This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1919, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, We Fe Harding, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the pleintiff hae come into Court ana asked to tak -suit einst the defendent, G. W. Moss; o@ non ag It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that the cause of action of the plaintiff egainst the defendant, G. W. Moss, be end the same ig hereby non suited, and t ad cause of action against said G. W. hat said allege Moss is hereby non-suited. It further appearing to the Court that the cause of action of the pleintift against the defendants, S Kk. Brown, Clarence Brown, b. #. Cornelius, M. Ww. Sherrill, 7. C. Sherrill and Re Be Gebriel, igs based on three notes for one hundred dollars each, and that the complaint hes been verified, end that no answer hes been filed to seid complaint; and thet summons in this action was gagené to and returned to January Tern, 1918 of Iredell Superi or It ie therefore considered, ordered and adjudged thet the leintiff recover of gaia S. &. Brown Clerence Brown, Re He briel, ie W. Sherrill, T. C. Sherrill ena Be PF. Cornelius, eum of $ 800.00, with interest on $100.00 from Maroh 12th. , 191 until peid; interest on $100.00 from April 12th. 1917, until and interest on $100.00 from May lst., 1917, until paid; and . BY CONSENT; pera; the costs of this ection to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. (Signed) W. F. Harding, Judge Presiding, North Carolina, | Superior Court, Iredell County. | May Term, 1919, A. Karusos J VS. I Jud gme nt. Chette Karusos} The plaintiff not desiring to prosecute this cese further: It is ordered that the same be and is hereby non-suited. Pile intiff to pey cost. (Signed) W. *#. Harding, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, |! In the Superior Court Iredell County ) May Term, 1919. Ne We Holland, Guardian | of John Sowers J Vs I J. P. Rumple. J JUDGMENT. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and being heerd and it eppearine to the Bourt that the parties, plaintiff und defendant, heve comprouised 211 matters on controversy on the following terms, tc wit: The plaintiff, We #. Hollanc, guardian of John Sowers, is to release the defendant, J.» P. Rumple, from the payment of all rents, or tnnual peyments and boerd of the said John Sowers for the years 1918 and 1919 end is to pay to the said J. P. kumple the sum of §500.00 in cash end is to pay to the oificer of the Court the cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk and is to permit the seid J. Pe Rumple to use and occupy the pre- mises described in the comple int until December the Zlst. 1919, except such parts of the place from which the crops my be now or hereefter removed which shall revert to the said W. W. Holland, guardian of John Sowers when and as seid crop metures and ere removed. All of ssid premises to be vecated on or before Lecember Slst. 1919, end the seid J. P. Rumple and wife, Maggie M. Kumple, ere to convey to the said John Sowers the premises described in the compleint free and discherged from 611 liens and incumbrances what- soever by deed containing the usual covenants and warranties; and it further eppearing to the Covrt that the caid J. P. kumple and wife, Maggie M. Rumple heve in compliance with that pert of their agreement already executed and delivered to the plaintiff's ward, John Sowers, their deed agreeable to the terms of the compromise and thet the plaintiff W. We Holland, guardian of John Sowers, has already paid to the defendgmt, J. P. kumple, the sum of $500.00 in performance of that part of his agreement; it is therefore con- sidered, adjudged and decreed that the said compromise he and the same is hereby in 611 respects confirmed and approved. It is further Considered and adjudged that the said defendant, J. P. Kumple, be permitted to occupy said promises till December 21st. 1919, unfer he tems set out above in said compromise agreement. It is ‘urther cOnsidered » edjudged that the plaintiff pay. the cost of tuis action © be taxed by the Clezk of this Genet and thet the sum so peid, together with’ the sum of $500.00, paid to the said J. P. Rumple, be allowed to said guerdian proper voucher in settlement with his ward's estate, (Signed) We Be ieee Judge Presiding. — . We ee igh Guardian for John Sowers Os BO beet ei iy Aff. : i * , North Caroline, / Iredell County. | In the Superior Court, May Tem, 1919. Statesville Lumber Company | . Vs . ] Judgment. U. I. Roseman. J This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, We s#. Harding, Judge Presiding, and it eppearing to the Court that the pleintiff and defendant have compromised and settled the matters in controversy between them, and thet the defendant has peid to the plaintiff the amount agreed upon; It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged that the a action of the plaintiff be and the same in hereby non-suited. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Uourt. 'Signed) We F. Harding, Judge Presiding North Caroline, | in the Superior Court Iredell County.) May Term, 1919. Je We Kaneer VS. Jud gme nt. Statesville Cotton Mills. ) This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell Gounty, before His Honor, We I. Harding, Judge Presiding, and it sppearing to the Court that all metters at issue betwe the pleintiff and the defendant have been adjusted by an agreanant thet t defendant chall pay to the pleintiff the sum of $500.00, withdraw the con claim in its enswer end pay the costs of ection. It is,therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $500.00, together with the costs of action, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, and that thet portion of defendant's answer setting up 6 counter-claim be stricken out. (Signe a) ie FE. Harding, Judge Presiding. “= - North Carolina f{ in the Superior Court Iredell County | May hein, 1919, 2 he Bller Mfg. Co., | VS. J Judgment. Harris Canpany. } ' This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, W+ ¥. Harding, Judge Presid and it appearing that the defendamt is indebted to the plaintiff in t gf $447.00, with interest thereon from the first day of June, 1918, rete of 6 per cent for goods sold and Ccelivere at for same is not resisted by the defenient; red, and that judgment : * It is, therefore, considered and ed judged that the pleint recover of the defendent the om of $447.00 arse interest thereon 4 per cent fromthe first d#y of June ‘of th be texed by the Clerk. . » 1916, and the costs of this C4 ay A (Signed) W. #. Herdi Boe “Guage Pree id Agreed: ae K. B. Weleghlin, atty for pleintif?. He Ce Lewie, Atty. fe No,22 North Carolina, ! In the Superiow Court, Iredell County. ! May Term, 1919. Sout hern Power Seneeny! Vs. Me C. Williams and ] énnea b- Williams. J What compensation, if any, are the defendants, M. C. Williams and wife, Anna b. Williams, ewtitled to recover of the plaintiff for entering upon the defendants’ lend, and for the right and privileges across defendants’ land, erd the permanent apvropriation thereof for the purposes of the plaintiff, as alleged inthe petitions, to wit: one strip 100 feet wide and 795 feet long, end another strip 30 feet wide and 1295 feet long and « third strip 30 feet wide and 1233 feet long. Answer: $2250.00--Two Thousend, Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars. North Carolina, in the Superior Court Iredell County. May Term, 1919. Southern Power Company Vs. Me C. Williams and wife,! JUDGMENT. Anne Be Williams. J This cause coming on to be heard at thie term of the Court before His Honor, W. F. Harding, Judge,and a Jury, end His Honor heaving submitted to the Jury the following issue, to wit: "What compensation, if any, sre defendants, M. C. Williams and wife, Anne Be Williams, entitled to recover of the rlaintiff for entering vpon the defendants' land, end for the right and privileges across defendants’ land, end the permanent eppropriation thereof for the purposes of the pleintiff, es alleged in the petition, to wit: one strip 100 feet wide and 795 feet long, and another strip 30 feet wide end 1295 feet long, and a third strip 30 feet wide and 1233 feet long?” And the jury in answering seid issue having assessed defendants’ compensation st Two Thousand Two Hundred and Fift, ($2250.00) Dollars, es set out in the record: It is,thereforé, considered, ordered and adjudged that defendants recover of the pleintiff the sum of Two Thousand ‘wo Hundred and hfty Lollers, with interest thereon from Mag 19th., 1919, et six per cent per annum until peid, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Dlerk of this Court. cid It is further considered, ordered and sdjudged thet the petitioner, Southern Power Company, be and it is hereby given the rere condemn a right of way only for 4 pole line, so es not to po snes the right to erect and maintsin towers, and that said pole double « consist of twenty-three roles, two of said petse he ving ekzbie guy wires attached to same; that said poles shell carry e cieeat circuit of three wires, and a fourth wire movn as a lightning aa be tap, und that saic wizes shell transmit a current of not over abe yo Said pole line to be erected end meinteined on the sheee : wey condemned, of the length end dimensions set out in the ssue. It is further edjudged thet petitioner heve the ri ght of ingress, egress end regress for the pu ’ 8 | rpome of repairing end maintéining its saia pre itne. ce . . (Signed) We f. Southern Power CO. I C ahoe / ‘C.Moose & wife il. R, Moose, The following a Ber din Sta ge Presiding, -o Grudger, J.E.Webb, £.C, J » WAWrtts, & R ‘Say they find the 1s: To - 29. In the Superior Court th Carolina, | > May Term, 1919. Iredell County. SOUTHERE POWER COMPANY | . VS. J ISSUES? Je Ce MOOSE AND WIFE, [| Ne E. MOOSE. } ; hat canpensetion, if any, are the defendants, J. ©. Moose and wife, Ne E. Moose, mtitled to recover of pleintiff for entering upon the defendents' lends and for the right em privilege across defendant lend, and the permanent appropriation thereof by plaintiff, as alleged) the petition, to wit: 729 feet long x 80 feet wide; another strip 635 feet long x 40 feet wide, and another strip 611 feet long x 320 teet wide? Answer: $800.00--Eight Hundred Dollers. North Carolina, Tredell County. In the Superior vourt, May Term, 1919. Southem Power Company Vs. Je C.lioose and wife, Wwe Be Moose. Judgment. ee ee This cause coming om to be heard at this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell Connty before His Honor, We Ke Harding, dudge, end : Jury, and His Honor having submitted to the jury the following seve; "whet compensation, if any, are the defendants, J. Ce Moose and wits, Ne Ee Moose, mtitled to recover of the pleintiff for entering upon the defendants’ land and for the right and privilege across the defendénts’ land and the permanent appropriation thereof by the rleint! as alleged in the petition: to wit; 729 feet long x 80 feet wide; end another strip 635 feet long x 40 feet wide and another strip 611 feet long x 30 feet wide? 4nd the jury in answer to said isgue rendered a verdict assess! defendants’ damege or compensaition at ($800.00) Eight Hundred dollars as set out in the record: It is therefore considered, ordered end edjudged thet the defendants recover of the petitioner the sum of Eight Hundred Dollers, with interest thereon from May 19th., 1919, at six per cent per annum until paid, end the costs of this actim to | of thie Court. © be taxed by the Clerk It is further cmsidered, ordered and «4 nudged that the petitioner, Southern Power Company, be and it 7 peste given the right to condemn « right of way only for a@ pole line, so us not to in- clude the right to erect or maintain towers, and that said pole line geet consist of 414) Fourteen poles carrying 6 single cireuit of a wires and a fourth wire known end used as a lighthing arrester, end that said wires shell transmit e current of not over 44000 volts; said pole line to be erected and maintained on the right of way condemned oi the length and dimensi one set outin th @ 8 e issue It is further adjugged thet the petitioner have the a tee as ingress, egress and regress for th said pole nies © purpose of repairing and minteining ite. (Signed) W.F. Harding Judge Presiding s North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Mey Tem, 1919. Cynthia Kobinson, | s,s I JUDGMENT. Robert Robinson. |] Thie cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before HighHonor, Harding, Judge am a Jury, and being heard end upon the whole record in the cause the Jury having found the issues in favor of the plaintiff: It ie, therefore, considered and ad judged by the Cmrt that the bonds of matrimony existing between the pnleintiff and the defendant be and the game are hereby dissolved and the pleintiff declared free and discharged from any and all liability because of the marriage in seid cmse. (Signed) ie B. Harding, Juége Presiding. em om North Caroline Iredell County. In the Superior Court, ) May Term, 1919. Vs. Estelle Glenn. ! I Oscar Glenn, J : JUDGMENT. This cemse coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Homor, Herding, Judge and a Jury, end being heard and upon the whole record in the causé,the Jury having found the issves in favor of the ple intiff: It is, therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of metrimony existing between the plaintiff end the defen dent be, and the sgme are hereby dissolved, and the pleintiff declared free and discharged from any and all liability because of the marriage in said cause. (Signed) W. F. Harding, Jud ge Presicing. North Carolina, | Superior Court Iredell County. | May Tem, 1919. E. Morrison J Vs. I Jud gme nt. We C. Alexander | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, Harding, Judge, end it appearing thet the plaintiff ir not desire to prosecute his action and desires to take & non- It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that a non-suit be taken, the plaintiff to pay the costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. , (Sienea) We Pe Herding. ae Superior Court Wey Term, 1919. North Carolina I! Iredell County. | Ce. De Miller, J X ¥s. ] Jud gment. oda Co be Cruse. J This cénse coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, Harding, Judge, and iit appearing that the plaintiff does not desire to prosecute his actim and desires to teke a non-snit; | It is, therefore, wnsidered end adjudged by the Court thet a non-suit be taken, the plaintiff to psy the costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Uourt. (Signed) We F. Harding, Judge Presiding. North Caroline, J ’ {redell County. | In the Snperior Court, May term, 1919 Oo Ce Be King j % /. Vs. } Judgment. Je Ke Petterson | This ceuse coming on ior hearing at this term of the Superior Court of lredell County, and the parties to the action héving adjusted their differences: It ig adjudged thet the cost of this action be taxed egeainst the) defendant by the Clerk of this Court. (Signed) W. F. Herding, Judge Presiding. Ce em ee NORTH CAROLINA, | In The Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY Mey Term, 1919. | Re Le Mesiden J Vac. } ISSUES: A. F. Harris] (1) Was the pleintiff’s cer injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged: Angwer: Yes. (2) Did the pleintiff by his own negligence contribute to the injury to hie car,as alleged? Answer: No. defendant? (3) het demage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled ‘to recover of the . Answer: $138.55, with interest from April 5th., 1918. oo (4) Wee the defendant's cer injured by the li e of plaintiff alle geay ‘ * tee ee es Answer: No. (5) Dia the defendant by his own negligence contrite to the inj his car, as elle ged? Answer: Yes. ee: (6) Whit demege, if any, is defendent entitled to recover of aa nt fa Answer: Nothing. ; eu ” Answer: | Iredell County. | | td. Hee the plaintiff teen a bona fide resident of North Cerolin La donde North Caroline J] In the Superior Court, TREDELL COUNTY | May Term, 1919. Vs. Jud gue nt. Ae F. Harris |] This cause coming on to be heerd et this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heerd before Hig Honor, We #. Harding, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as set out in the record: It is,therefore, erdered and edjudged by the Court that the pleintiff recover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred and Thirty Eight and 53/100 ($138.53) dollers and interest thereon from the 5th. dey of April, 1918, until paid, together with the costs of this action, as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. (Signed)W. #. Harding, Judge Presiding. -———— North Caroline, | Iredell County. | In the Superior Court, May Tem, 1919. Mamie Lyon J] Vs Issues. QO. De Lyon. ] 41) Did the plaintiff end defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes. (2) Wd the defendant commit advltry es elleged inthe complaint? Answer: Yes. (3) Hes the pleintiff been & ton& tide resident of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action? Yes, ‘orth Carolina ) in the Superior Court, May Tem, 1919. Mamie Lyon VS. Jud gme nt. QO, be Lyon. wee ee This cause coming on to be heard end being heard ct thie Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, before Hie Honor, We F. Harding, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them es follows: "let. Did the plaintiff end defendant intermarry as alleged in the comple int? Answer: Yes. énd. Did the defendent commit adultery es alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, or more then two years prior to the commencement of this setion Answer; Yea, " ~~ . _ It ie therefore matrimony t ; Mo J). 7 Ree ee " 1, wf ( Frenute Ddey North Caroline, | Be eae apes In the Superior Court, .a North Caroline May Tem, 1919. Iredell County. 9 Je E. Poy and Dermot Shemwell trading es Foy « Shemrell. Vs. Me P. Alexander, Sheriff of Iredell County Judgment. It eppearing to the Court that a Compromised Wudgnent been reached in the above matter, having It is ordered end adjudged, vpon Motion of Hudson and Hudson, ang P. V. Critcher, Attorneys for the rlaintiff, and by agreement of Zeb V, Long, attorney for the defendant, that the plaintiff have possession of one Ford Touring Car now in possession of the defendant, and that the plaintiffs pay $5.00 of the cost of this case and $10.00 of the storage bill of said car, and that the defendant pay the belance of the cost of this case end the balance of the storage bill. This the 28th. day of May, 1919. We Fe Hardi ng No Judge Presiding. : 17 Agreed to by Hudson & Hudson and P. Ve. Critcher, Attorneys for plaintiff. Zeb V. Long, Attorney for defendant. In the Superior Court, Iredell County. J May Term, 1919. Karusos, } Vs. I Jud gme nt . G. A. Critcher. | Plaintiff comes into Gourt and takes e& voluntary non-mit. *% It is therefore considered thet plaintiff's action be, end is hereby non-suited end that plaintiff pay the costs of action. (Signed) W. ». Harding Judge Presiding. -——— om ee ae liorth Caroline, J} ( In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | May Tem, 1919. Fe C. De. Moore | Vs. | Judgment. Lloyd Vlosninger} This cause coming om to be heard at this term before His Sonor, Harding, Judge, and a Jury, and the Jury having found that the plaintiff ie entitled to recover fifteen dollars: ordered that pleintiff eecover of defendant fifteen dollars, the amount of the gender, and interest on $15.00 till day of tender, together with cost to dete of tender, and pleintiff pay cost after date of tender. It ie, therefore, (Signed) W. F. Harding, | & Le Church ena |othe Jué ge Presiding. Nort) Gerolina | In the Superior ¢C Iredell County | ate, ee May Term, 1919. 0. De Moore Be Issues. Lloyd Cloaninger | Li is the defendant indebdtea to th ; t eo 2 amount? Answer; $15.00 North Carolina J In the Superior Court, Iredell County./ May Term, 1919, A. Ke Saville | Vs. I JUDGMENT , Ae F. Harris f This cause coming on to be heerd and being heard at this Term of the Court before His Honor, W. i, Harding, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court thet the plaintiff and defendant have settled their differences, and that the defendant has agreed to pgy the plaintiff the sum of three hundred dollers end the costs of this action:: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Three Hundred Dollars, together with the costs of this ection es taxed hy the Clerk of the Court. We F. Harding, (Signed) Judge Presiding. North Carolina J In the Superior Court, Iredell County. May Tem, 1919. ke C. Kyles by hie Next Friend,] he he Kyles, J Vs. ! We C. Myers. J JUDGMENT , this céuse coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1919, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Ws Fe Harding, Judge Presiding, and it eppemring to t Court that since the institution of this action, the nincr fibaen t, Re C. Kyles, hes arrived at the age of twenty-one years end is now mi juris and effirms the institution of this action through his Next Friend, 4. A. Kyles; and it appearing further to the Court that A. A. Kyles as Next Friend of ke C. Kyles, and hk. U. Kyles acting in his own right heve compro- mised and settled the matters in controversy in this action, sand thet the Plaintiff tes been yeid in iull the smovnt agreed upon, and the Vourt approving in:#@1l respects the compromise and settlement made by the perties hereto: : It is, therefor e, considered, ordered and edjudged by the Vourt that the defendant go hence without day, end that the pleintiff pey the costs of this action to be texed by the Clerk of this Court. (Signed). Wl F. Harding, Judge Presiding. BY CONSENT: L. C. Caldwell end H. P. Grier, Attys for Plaintiff. Ae t+ Weatherman, Ws L. Turner, Dorman Thompson, Attys for Defendant. North Varoline, | In the Syperior Court Tredell County. ] May Term, 1919. rnveayi ite Lumber Company Jud gme nt . i 8. " Je 2. Howard. j J I J This cause com on to be heard ing on wthe May Term, 1919 dee erior Court of Iredell County, befo His Honor, We #. | *residing, end it appearing to the Court that plaintif: Gants have agreed upon a settlement of the matters in ti g come into Court and indiceted ‘ov North Carolina, |! In the Superior Court, itemized and set out in the léth. paragraph of the complaint: It is, therefore, considered and edjudged thet the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $265.95, with interest on each mont payment of $1.27 per month fromthe first day of each menth from the is dey of September, 1900, up to en@ including the Month of June, 1901, a interest on each monthly pe yment of %2.C4 per mnth from the first day ¢ exch month trom the lst. day of July, 1901, up to and including the nonth of Decenber, 1909, and interest on monthly peyment of $2.20 1 nonth from the tirst dsy of each month from the Ist. day of Jenuery; 1916; up to and including the mogth of dune, 191%, end interes on each monthly peyment of $1.76 ver month from the first day of each month from the lst. day of duly, 191%, up to gné including the rconth af Becember, 1915, together with the costs of this ection as taxed by the Clerk of the Court. “s ( dte oe Sekt Willy PAgl 2 OF U 9 ; each Ao pez } (Signe a) tie Le Herding Judge Presiding Nortt Caroline, J In the Superior Court Iredell County J “Mey Term, 1919. Ze Le Cornelius } | Vs } Supreme Concleve Improved ] Order of Heptesophe. I Judgment. *his ceuge coming on to be beard end being heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, We #. Haz ding, Judge Presiding, and it sppearing to the Court that this case hes been pending in thi# Vourt since May Term, 1917, to abige the decision of the Supreme Cour ‘orth Carclina ond the Sypreme Cefrt of the United States in the ase areinst the defendant to escert#in defendant's liability to itg¢polic} holders under the facts alleged in the compleint; and it eappeaping t Court thet said Courts hevé decided the cases presented adversely to oo meen ti one of the defendént; and thet the defendant, at this term of ourt, hes withdrawn ite answer and agreed thet the plaintiff may take judgment for the smount demanded in his compleint; end it further appearing that the plaintiff has filed his verified complaint where he demnde judgment for the sum of $401.44, with interest on each pay® of the premiumg as itemized a . complaint: amé set out in the 16th. paragraph of t % = It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintift recover of the a the gum of cise fith ret ovaad’ on | monthly payment of $1.28 per month from the first 01 and after the Ist. day of Merch, 1899, up t¢ June, 1901, and interest on four extra _ period es follows: June and August 19 _ interest on each minthly peyment of each month from and.efter the let. day the month of December, 1909, and intere er month from the first day anuary, 1910, up to and inclved on pe penthly reynent of $e. # . i to and inc nd of thie ection es ta TS hy vs “Vga : i 43. tipped Sept. 16th, 1918 and the complaint in the action was filed Nov, id ety, A, 1938, duly verified and the plaintiffs cause of action is founded on- " 4 m Lites obligation made set and easy of collection as to the amount due : answer has been filed to said complaint, ee : ‘dotlars, with thereon from and after date hereof, together with the costs | | . Nos 42. | North Carolina, | Iredell County. | .| #enkel-craig Live Stock Co. | i .|G.W.Caldwell, T.E.Lippara, | ee 1, L. Lipparda, County | May Term, 1919. ae ; eo 4 forth Curdlina, In the Superior Court, | ‘Je ie Bost 1) q teyapes County. May Term, 1919, Supreme Concleve Improved | Judgment. a R.S,Sherrill } Order of Heptasophs. fo. 12. «var 6 ew This cause coming on to be heard end being heard et this term — Soqen Sailway Company. | of the Court before His Honor, W. F. Herding, Judge Presiding, md it | appeeri an to the Court that this cese has been pending in thig, Court This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His if Miay vem, 1917, to abide the decision of the Supreme Court ofthe : State of North Carolina ami the Sypreme Court of the United Stetes in Honor W.F,Harding, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the ceses sgainst the defendant to ascertain defendant's liability to its . ; policy holders under the facts alleged in the compleint; and it sppéariy ‘parties have compromised all matters in controversy in this action, the | thet seid Courts have @ecided the cuses presented edversely to the cone hs tentions of the defendant; and that the defendant, at thie Tem of the le DEFENDENT agreeing to pay the plaintiff the sum of one Hundred and Eighty | Co'.rt, hes withdrawn its enswer and egreed that plaintiff nay teke AN co | judgment for the emount demanded in kis complaint; and it further nppe 4’) Seven and 50/00 ($187.50.) in full settlement and satisfaction of all that plaintiff hes filed his verified complaint wherein he demends jud s for the sym of *865.98, with interest on each payment of the premiums § y {damages sustained by plaintiff for the causes set out in the complaint; It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff 7" ppecover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred and Eighty Seven and 50/00 of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, ¥.F.Bevding udge Presiding. Approved: Z.¥.Long & H.P.Grier orneys for Piain ° | Superior Court, May Term, 1919. 1 JUDGMENT. This cause coming on for hearing at this tefm of thtux the Court hd it appearing to the Court in this action that the summons was duly Ssued and served on te defendants W.G.Caldwell Sept. 19, 1918 and on Mrs, i pe considered and adjudged that. the ple! | North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, seh (0 note Ma’ Term 1919. 4 J ey Iredell County | y , ) North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Je We Bost 1) | Iredeti~-County. May Term, 1919, a } Vs. uoreme Concleve Improved I Judgment. y“ | -R,S,Sherrill | Order of Heptasophs. over 6 JUDGMENT, This cause coming on to be heerd end being heard .* tris term | Southern Sailway Company. | x , . 4a H . ¥ ry Har ding d res j > ma gppeeri ne to the Csurt thet tis ccve tus been peneing in thi Court 8} This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before Bis Mic sts eae the Supreme Court of the United Stetes in | Honor W.F,Harding, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the eases secainst the defendant to ascertain defendant's liability to its : g policy holders under the facts alleged in the complsint; end it appeart thet said Courts heve decided the cuses presented edversely to the cone} tentions of the defendant; ard that the defendent, at this Temn of the | _ DEFENDENT agreeing to pay the plaintiff the sum of one Hundred and Pighty ourt ‘ > gnewer and egreed that plaintiff nay teke by 6 ' denended in his complaint; snd it “teneece’ ala /-\Seven and 50/00 ($187.59.) in full settlement and satisfaction of all “parties have compromised all matters in controversy in this action, the east on Caah hayeeuk OC 4m coentee | damages sustained by plaintiff for the causes set out in the complaint; pene oe e It is therefore considered and adjudged that the platntiff ays von each conthlg — puacover of the defendant the sum of One Hundred and Eighty Seven and 59/00 > Month of felie | ROOT i | dollars, with thereon from and after date hereof, together with the costs ee ha en of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, U F nny } 9 © err 4 ‘ -€ or nonthly peyment oO. $2 020 n the Ist. day of W.F,Hardt June, 1912, and interes Judge Prestitne. . = ' the first 4d ech { gnd including t e month of | Approved: f this ection es texed by the i tion . ,2.¥.Long & H.P,Grier Tetsrness for PTIatntiits. } Noe 42, & y h ¥ North Carolina, § Superior Court, Iredell County. | May Term, 1919, Menkel-Craig Live Stock Co. | } } neleve my ve J “VSe { I Heptasophe. , G.W.Caldwell, T.E,Lipparda, | JUDGMENT. @ « L.L. Lippard, i | «hig ceuse coming on to be teard end being heard at this i the Court before His Honor, bt. Harding, Judge Presiding, sppetring to the Court thet this cese hes heen pending in this » Since May Term, 1917, to abige the decigion of the Supreme Court 3 Ag tier end the Sypreme Cert of tre United States in the £ases : 5 azainst the defendant to ascert#in defendant's liability to ittg/policy 4 . i are teers the facts alle’ged in the complaint; and i: appe fie to t 1 ' y@md it appearing to the Court in this action that the summons was duly vourt thet said Courts heave decided the cases presented sdversely to t ] BF cae tans defendént; and thet the hotenlart et this aie of 4 issued and served on tye defendants W.G,Caldwell Sept. 19, 1916 and on Mrs, rOuUrt, hes w drawn its answer end agreed thet the plaintiff may take ; iar th arenes demanded in his corpleint; aT it further Bs L.L.Lippard Sept. 16th, 1918 and the complaint in the action was filed Nov, FE eee ene Fae ie plaintiff has filed his verified compleint wherei@ he demende judgment for the sum ot $401.44, with fahaue ek on banb pay Sth, 1918, duly verified and the plaintiffs cause of action is founded on of the premiume es itemized sue set ’ c i vine + the complaint: ago set out in the l6éth. paragraph of ' | | | } | This cause coming on for hearing at this tefm of thixx the Court W written obligation made set and easy of collection as to the amount due wnsing e eeteks aepeeees teen on adjudged that the plaintiff i . [hereon and that no answer has been filed to said complaint, vove i VE Snoent the sum of 9401.44, with interest on each hae Mead ether tht den ny ng yx moth from the first ao of naan ree ey i It 4s therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff i 4. ‘SU. day of March, 1899, up to ené includ the monts a wa i peers tats ond Aarne. On four extra paynauee of $1288 during seid — a | have judgment by’ default against said defendants ror ee of an answer end iutarast bn sangha Tie Argvet 1300, 208 Merch end May 19015 sn’ ee =} it 4 0) | ad that the plaintiffs recover of the Seah ‘ned Whiten and.e faye $1.82 per month from the first days ; s therefore considered and adjudge a Pp 3 "1 : ro. ere ® ist. day of Jul 1901, up to and inolaes j ; : = a ha eae re end interest on the bon this yeyment of % | defendants W.G,Caldwell & Mrs.L.L.Lippard the sum of Six Hundred and Stx% met © first day of eech month fr Ist. 46 is January, 1910, up to and including the ‘month af = a a3. an in ree | Sixteen Dollars, with interest from Oct, 17th, 1918, until pata and the * oe monthly peyment of $2.60 per month, from and after the first. , ol é' of August, 19165, up to and inc inding the month of December, 1915, with the oets of thie ection es taxed by the vierk of the Court. — q SwehtR/7 A We be 5 J eet) J yadee Petes ie re es _ North Carolina, | Superior Court, | North Carolina, } In the. Sunertor Court, Iredell County. | May Term, 1919. : | Iredell County.) May Term, 1919, Bezs.. DH. Brantley { Mrs.D.S.Williams, Administratrix of John W.Williams 4 | -vs- 4 JUDGIENT, -VS- } JUDGMENT. Supreme Conclave Improved } Southern Railway Company. { order of Heptasonhs t Southern Railway Company, by and through its counsel, Caldwell & This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term Caldwell enter a special appearance in this cause, and move the Court to of the Court before His Honor, ‘,F,Harding, Judre Presiding, and it annear- dismiss the same for the following reasons: That under an act of Congress, ing to the Court that this cause has been vending in this Gourt sinee Mav Southern Railway Company, together with other Railroads in the United States ferm, 1917, to abide the deeision of the Suvreme Court of the State of ¥n on the ist day of January 1918, were taken over for Governmental purposes, North Carolina and Supreme Court of the United States in cases arsinst the out of the control and management of their then respective officials, defendantz to ascertain defendant's liability to tts noliey holders under together with all appliances and employees operating said Railways, and the facts alleged in the complaint; and it annenring th..t satd Courts have placed under the absolute control of a" Director General of Railroads," and decided tne sented adversly to the contentions of the defendant; that since that time, and at the time of the alleged wrong the Director General and that the defendant, at this Term of the Court, has withdrayn its answer of Railroads has been in absolute, and continuous control of Southern Railway end agreed that plaintiff may take judement for the anount demended in his Company in all of its branches, operating, and controling the same free complaint; ana it fubther that plaintiff has filed his verified complaint discharged from all participation therein by Southern Railway Company. wherein he demands judgement for the sun of *980,00, with interest on each That fouthern Railway Company at no time since January lst., 1918 payment of the premiums as itemized and set out mamk in the 15th. pararcrabh has any egent at Statesville or elsewhere; that on said date B,A.Cowah, upon of the complaint. whose service of summons was made was not the agent of Southern Railway It is therefore, considered end adjudred that the vlaintiff Company, but was the agent of the Director General of Railroads. recover of the defendant the sum of Nine Hundred and Sirhty Dollars, with © That no act or thing was done by Southern Railway Company since interest on each monthly payment of *2.80 ver month from the first dew of 4% said date, and it can not be responsible for the acts of the Government, The each month from and after January 1st, 1897, un to and including the month property of the said Company having been involuntarily taken for it by a. of June, 1901, and interest on four extra payments of *2,80 during said paramount power, and in the exclusive control and operation of the Government period as follows: July and September 1900, and March and June, 1901, and at the time of the Act complaimed of, interest on each monthly payment of %4,52 per month from the first day of Wherefore it prays the Court to dismiss the action as to it. each month from and after the lst. day of July, 1901, un to and ineluding 4 4 ’ WT ~ » & Caldwell & Caldwell Babi jp bhe month of December, 1909, and interest on each monthly payment of "4,84 ounsé » } a oe | per monthix from the first day of each month from and after the £irek 1st, Consented that action as , to So.Ry.Co. be dismissed and that the Pirectof — | day of January,1910, up to and including the month of July,1913, and tinker General of Railroads be the a | 7 : ne defendente. | interest on each monthly payment of $4.96 per month from the first day of W.F,Hard q yudge rae Soran q each month from and after the lst. day of August, 1913, up to and including the month of December, 1915, together with the cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk of the Court. 4 WF, Harding te Tudee Prestding. (de a d puhis Wb. (7 “pj v4) ae j } ! North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } May Term, 1919, | Wm.R.Allison { | -VS- } | Supreme Conclave Improved | JUDGHENT, | Order Heptasophs. { ‘on four extra payments of 50,98 during said pertod as follows: June and This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, W.F,Harding, Judge Presicing, and it appearing to the Court that this cause has been pending in this Court since the May Term, 19]7, to abide the decision of the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina and the Supreme Court Of the United States in cases araint the defendant to ascertain defendants liability to its policy holders under the facts alleged in the complaint: and it sppearing that said Courts have decided the cases presented adversly to the contentions of the defendants; and that the defendantz, at this Term of the Court, has written its answer and agreed that the phaintiff may take Judgement for the amount demanded in his complaint; and it further apveasaring that nlaintiff has filed his verified complaint wherein he demands judgment for the sum of $352.78, with interest on each payment of the premiums as itemized and set out in the 16th, paragragh of the comlaint,. * It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintif recover of the defendant the sum of $352.78, with interest monthly payment of $0.95 per month from the first day of each month from and after the lst. day of January, 1898, up to and including the month of Tune, 1901, and interast August 1900, and March and May 1901, and interest monthly payment of $1.54 |'per month from the first day of each month and after the lst. day of August, /1901, up to and including the month of December, 1909, and interest on each |monthly payment of $1.99 per month from the first day of each month from and after the lst. day of January, 1910, up to and including the month of uly, /1913, and interest on each momthly payment Of $2.11 per month from the first) day of each month from and after the lst. day of August, 1913, up to and 3 including the month of December, 1915, together with the cost of this action | taxed by the Clerk of the Court, W.F?@Hardin bien. aaee PreATaTH Ma oe pa fy ashd fa /i7 Page 20/) re North Carolina,| Iredell County.) John A.Craven { -V3e { Supreme Conclave Improved |] Order of Heptasophs. § This cause term of the Court before Hi May Term, 1917, to abide th the defendant to ascertain the facts alleged in the co decided the cases presented anc that the defendant, at and agreed that plaintiff m comolaint wherein he demand on each payment of the prem paragraph of the complaint. plaintiff recover of the dé ~ from the lst, day of July, 1909, and interest on each september, 1913, up to and No.35, E. Morrison “VS— Carolina Motor Co. No. 34 L.W. Westmoreland -VGe WY. Westmareland appearing to the Court that this cause has been pending in this Court s North Carolina, and The Supreme Court of the United States in cases arninst | complaint; and it fubther appearing tha plaintiff has filed his verified It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the nisin each monthly payment of $2.70 per month from the first day of each month first day of each month from the lst day of January, 1919, up to and including the month of August, 1915, and interest on each monthly payment of $3.02 per month from the first day of each month from the lst day of with the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of the Court. eyo. Ref YOARY £00) WF Herding = OOF ws ts In the Superior Court, May Term, 1919, CH CS Gg Q oe 3 Zz, 2 coming on to be heard and being henrd at this S Honor, 7,.F.,Harding, Judge Presiding, and it since e decision of the Supreme Court of the State of | defendants liability to its vnolicy holders under mplaint; and it anvearing that said Court have | adversly to the contentions of the defendant; 4 this term of the Court, has withdraw its answer ay take judgment for the amount demanded in his s judgment for the sum of *455,28, with interest fums as itemized and set out in the 18th féendant the sum of $455.23, with interest on 1902, up to and ineluding the month of Necember, monthly payment of 42.90 ver month from the including the month of December, 1915, together Continued by consent, W.M. Lundy i 0 J.S.Moore & Co, & J.S.Moore and ] 0.T,Leonard, individually. Locke Moore ' { Sou.Railway Co. & J.H.Sands & Co, | lotion as to Sou.Railway Co. to dismiss it for reasons set ‘accepts, No.40,. No. het No.8 | No.20 No.28, H.L. Davis -VSe Sou. Railway Co, Page & Moore -VSe Sou.Railway Co, : 9 ‘ Statesville Lumber -VSe Barger Bros, J,J,Mott, { -VS-~ I R.L. Flanigan } M.M,Early ~VSa J.P,Little & Henkel Craig Live Stock Co, Walter A,Prost & Co, forth in the written motion herewith filed, Same motion as above, Same Motion as { Defend } filetanswer, Death of Plaintirrf surrested: Administrator allowed to be made parties, J.K.Morrison Gro. & Pro, Co. § above, CONTINU En, First National Bank of Statesvélie,] ~VSu T.Foy White. Sou. Railway Co. -VG~=< Queen Knitting Mill. { CONTINU 2#®D,; CONTINYG ED Co. Plaintiff allowed to amend its complaint, CONTIUED, Judgment of the Court that the Plaintiff be Non-suited and to pay the cost, Motion ovérrruled and deft, ant allowed to make new parties and time to | 10,58. “wae i A Karusus { ~Vs~< : t JUDGMENT NON*SUITED, rr E.M,Ervin, Admr, of R.D,Ervin, Dec'ad } Chette Karusus action have adjudred their Via 1 differances by consent, It is ordered that the cost be baxed Sou. Railway Co, ) against the defendant, C.E.Mills, H,O,Steele and &, Morrison { CORT Seven : Fred A. Thomas, ' John McNeely -VS- 4 Laura McNeely 4 TSSuUES l- Did Plaintiff and defendant marry as allered? (ey Answere Yes 2- Did defendant commit adultry as alleged? Answere Yes, Has Plaintiff been a resident of the State for more than two years before the commencement of this action? Answere Yes, North Carolina, Supertor Court, Iredell County, May Term, 1919, John McNeely, Plaintiff { -vs~ j JUDGMEN? Laura McNeely, defendant. { This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before His Honor, W.F.Harding, Judge andsa (jury and being heard and unon the whole record in the case the jury having the issues in favor of the Plaintire, It 1s therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the setmeneee, be and the same are hereby. dissolved and the plaintiff decd : Mtecnargea from any ont all Mabiiity because of the . apnearing to the Court that the North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County.44 May Term, 1919, E,L.Cornelius -VS- q Supreme Conclave Improved 7TUDGE EY 7, Order of Heptasophs. q This cause coming on to be heard and being héard at this term of Court before his Honor, W.F.Harding, Judge Presiding, and it appearing the Court that this cause has been pending in this Court since May Term, 19 to abide the decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina and the Supreme Court of The United States in the cases againt the defendant to ascertain defendant's liability to its policy holders under the facts alleged in the complaint; and it appearing to the Court that said Courts have decided the cases presented adversly to the contentions of the defendant; and that the defendant, at this term of the Court, has withdrawn its answer and agreed that the plaintiff may take judgment for the amount demanded in his complat and it further appearing that the plaintiff has filed his verified complaint). wherein he demands judgment for the sum of *401,44, with interest on each - & ’ payment of the premiums as itemized and set out in the 16th paragraph of the complaint. .It is, therefore, consideded and adjudged that the plaintifr recover of the defendent the sum of *401.44, with interest, on each monthly payment of $1.28 per month from the first day of each month from and after the lst. day of Merch, 1899, up to and including the month of June 1901, and} interest on four extra payments of $1.28 during said period as follows: June and August 1900, and March and Mey 1901, anc interest on each monthly, paymenm of $1.82 per month from the first day of each month from and after the 1st day of July, 1901, up to and including the month of December, 1909, and interest on monthly payment of %2.38 per month from the first cay of each month from and after the lst. day of Jenuary, 1910, up to and including the» month of July, 1913, and interest on each monthly payment of ®2,50 per mon from and after the first day of August, 1913, up to and including the mon’ of December, 1915, together with the costs in this action as taxed by the Clerk of the Court. MONDAY, 28th, 1919. North Verolina, Iredell County. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County of Iredell on the Sth Monday before the lst Monday in September, 1919, the: same being the 28th day of Juby, 1919, when and where His Honor Jufge W.J.Adams, is present and presiding, and Honorable Sélicito Hayden. Clement, is present end prosecuting in the name of the State, M.P.Alexander, the high Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: D.H.Perry, W.F.Bailey, D.D.Little, N.G.Holmes, L.G.Knox, Jmo.B. Reece, J.A.Tatum, J.P.Collins, E,D.Mayes, A.C.Jones, I.A.McLean, A.B. Parker Jno.V. Barger, E.E.Edminston, A.J.Beaver, J.A.Barnard, S.G.Swann, E.W. Cranford, B.N.Brawley, R.S.Dingle, W.A.McKnight, L.A. AndersonJd.L.Ervin, J.H.Webber, J.F.Aldmen, Ervin Steele, J.D.Hartness, A.W.White, J.F.Gatton, W.S,Reic, A.F.Herris, J.B.Rhine, W.D.Creedmore, C.H.Brown, A.W.Stevenson, H.L.Gilbert. The folowing good and lawful men were sworn as Grand Jurors for the term, as follows, to-wit: J.L.Ervin, J.B.Rhine, Ervin Steele, A.C. Jones, A.W.Whité, L.A.Anderson, E.W.Crawford, J,F.Gatton, A.W.McKnight, B,N,Brawley, J.H.Webber, W.S.Reid, A.F.Harris, A.J.Beaver, E.D,Mayes, E,E,Edthinston, A.B. Parker, W.D.Creedmore. A.C,dones is sworn as foreman of the Grand Jury. C.A.Brady is ew6tf as Officer of the Grand Yury. The following good and lawful men ere sworn ss petty jurors for the first week of this Court, to-wit: W.F.Bailey, D.D.Little, N.G. Holmes, L.G,Knox, Jno.B.Reece, J.P.Collins, 1.0.uiieen, $.G,Swann, R.S. Dingle, BSF. Aldmen, J.D. Heartness, A.W.Stevenson, H.L,Gilbert. UM. erry, J.A.Tatum, Jno.V.Barger, J.A.Barnard is excused for the term, C.H.Brown is sick. | Monday, July 28 No. 5 =" . A.W.D.W. Cc | Reletgn Miller | John Abb Allison. | Nod | State vs | Raleigh Miller Murder. No. 5 | State vs : Retailing. Scarla Davis Jim McCarter No.6 tate vs Larceny. Ed Hegler No.7 State vs Jim Talford No.8 State vs Fred Caldwell No.9 State vs Abandonment, Carter Reddick No.10 State vs Larceny. Son Brown, Alias Geo, Bemnett No.1ll State t vs A.W.D.¥. James Carlton. No.12 State vs False Pretense. C.C.Harpe. No.13 State vs : ABandonment,. | Watt Kerr, No.14 | State vs | Harvey Lee Houston No.15 State vs Affray. Son Pravatt : Henry McDaniels, No.16 State va L.& R, Tom Pickens, 1 No.17. Stete re th, 1919. ontinued,. Alias Capias and Continped. Cotinued under former order. Continued under former order, Alias Cepias and Continued, \ Alias Capias and continued Alies Capias and Continued. , . e one ae Nol pros with Leave, Alias Capias and Continued, Alias Capias and Continued. Continued under former order. Trial as to Henry MeDaniels, Alias Capis as Son Privett,. Alies Capias, 8 Capias, oo « No.18 State vs DavisoGatther No.20 State vs Will Lewis. No.21 State vs Robert Woodward, No.22 State vs Will Bell No.23 State vs J.W.Campbell No.24 6 Stabe @ vs John ‘Teague’ No.25. State Va. J.C.Roseman,. | No.26 State > V8 J,.C,Roseman No.27 State vs Len Byrang. Farris Bryant No.28 State vs Kelly Souther Carl Souther No.29 “State vs Kelly Souther earl Souther, No.30 Stabe vs Frank Lineberger, No.32 State . vs urley Myers Plake Holland, No.33 State vs E.J.Cain, Monday, July 28th, 1919, es AtW.DpW. tAltescCapias, ' | A.W.D.W, Continued foe State, |. } Too much whiskey. Alias Capias and Continued, / Mfg. Liqupr. Alias Capias, ) Seduction. | Continued. i { Larceny.. Alias Capias and Continued, {Operating Auto 1/2 hour after |The jury being sworn jsunset and befope 1/2 hour } anc: empannelled for }before sun-rise without lights. | gheir verdict say they find Dedt. not guilty. bi e jury peeing sworn end empannel | Reckless Driving. ed fon theip verdict say they £t { find the Bert. not guilty. Alias Capias,. Alias Capias, Continued, } Elopement. Alias Capias, Having too much whiskey. Conginued, : Having Liquor contrary to law. Continued, Burning Hotel Iredell, Alies Capies. Mondey, July 28th, 1919. oe TUESDAY, July, @9th, 1919, No.35 No.72 State ue State t f Deft. pleads guilty of simple assault vs A.W.D.W, Alias Capias. S vs [Bastardly, }| Judgment suspended on payment of cost, | W,Y¥.Westmoreland. ) Garfield Summers, } } No.56 No.57 o i ; State j c.c.W. Pleads guilty. Judgment $50.00 wo Continued for State, vs ane eon. : : Hal Cook. : | : Jack (Jake) Couble : No,.39 ‘ No,.54 State { State Having:Liqnéreontrary to lan. vs A.W.D.W. Continued. v8 ' Deft, pleads guilty of having liquor in his’ Carl Allison, } Carl Spry. ; possession for purposes of sale, No.50 NO.55 State } Having liquor contrary to law. The Deft. being ° State Having liquor contrary to law. vs {( represented by counsel waives bill and pleads guilty, vs Deft. pleads guilty of heving intoxicating liquors | R. J. Plott | of having liquor in his possession for the purpose o Burton Cherles, in his possession for purposes of sale, No.75 NOs 4 State | A.W.D.W. Deft, through his counsel waives bill and | Walter -Morrison State witness.called and failed in case State vs W.R.Smith vs { pleads guilty of assault with a deadly weapon upon Peete or Lester Flowe, { Horace Wlexander., Judgment fine $15.00 and cost. : and C,L.Sherrill. re No.62, $7 ,&6,Ce/, State {A.W.D.W. Plea not guilty. Jury trial. % : : | No. 76 vs {Defendants each guilty of A.W.D.W. | State Robert Lee Batley ; | oa C.B.Houser | Robert Lee .Bailey Qdell King | J.Henry Allison “enry King. . | Garlee Houser | Odell King. Gambling. Robert Lee Bailey pleads guilty. Deft, J.Henry Allison pleads guilty. Deft. Odell King Pleads guilty. Deft. Carlee Houser pleads not Guilty. The jury No. 1 being sworn and empanneled finds the Deft Carlee Houser guilty. Judgment ,Robert Lee Dailey 30 days in Jail to be worked on County farm. Judgment ,Henry Allison 30 days in Jail to ve worked on County farm. Judgment, Carlee Houser 30 days in Jail to be worked on County farm. Judgment, Odell King 30 days in Jail to be worked NO.38 State | Attempt to rape. Deft. being rep : waives bill and pleads guilty of~1 f Earl Clerk, Judgment suspended on payment of cust. No.52 BtBtbendir. on County farm. oho vs Tow much loqgquor, Nol Pros With Leave. | LP oa GA Late, R.E.Laneir. - : ' Ly No,51 State C.C.W. Deft, being represented by Counsel waives bill John Logan vs and pleads guilty. R.E.Laneir. : No.49 State - Having liquor contrary to law. Vs Deft. Bill Calfas called and failed, Judgment Nisi Bill Calfas Sci Fa and Capias, Continued as to Spiros Calfas Spiros Calfas on same bond. ' Having liquor ontrery to law. Nol Pros With Leave No.68 State 2 House breaking. Deft. pleads guilty, “Ss Holmes, é No.40 State ig Called and failed Judgment Nisi Sci Fa Roy McLelland and Vapias, No.43 State { big } A.W.D.W. Called and failed Judgment Nisi Sei Fa Wayne Norman { and Capias. « . No.66 +. State i Assault on Female, Deft. pleads guilty Judgment vs | ; suspended on payment of cost. Lon Benfielg, ee, : No.67. State No.47 State vs Bud Millsaps No.46 State vs Bud Millsaps No.48 State vs Bud Millsaps, No.59 State vs Robert Lee Bailey C.B.Houser Odell King Henry King .No.44 State vs S.M.Goodman G.W.Wilhelm No.78 State vs Fred Johnston No.1s Me State . ~ Bud Foaser-* No. 80 State vs Will Perkins No. 81 State vs Will Perkins No.82 “tate vs Will Perkins No. 69 State vs Melt&AShoemaker No. 70 State vs Vergile Shoemaker, No.71 ino State vs Ada Shoemaker, ° vs 8° et EE MH PH eC ee ed ER EE DE t } AW.D.W. . ) SF wee Tuesday, July 29th, 1919. C.C.W. Pleads not. guilty. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empanneled find the Deft. guilty. Judgment 6 months in Jail with leave to commissioner to work on County farm, ABandonment. Continued under former order, Attempt secret assault, Not a true bill. AFFRAY. Plead not guilty. Jury No.l beir~ sworn oe and empanneled find gach defendant guilty of A.W.D.W Judgment Robert Lee Batley 90 days in Jail to be, worked on County Farm. Deft. C.3.Houser $10.00 fine and 1/4 cost. worked on County farm. Deft. Henry King 90 days in jail to be worked on County farm. Not to wear felon stripes, A.W.D.W. Deft. G.W.Wilhelm pleads guilty. S.M.Goodman pleads not guilty. Sworn and empanneled find Deft. S.M.Goodman guilty of A.W.D.W. Judgment Deft. G.W.Wilhelm fined #10.00 and 1/2 cost. Deft S.M.Goodman fined $25.00 and 1/2 gost. Deft A.W.D.W. Called and failed Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and captias. Nol Pros With Leave. f ‘e * - : . Pi te, PM. + C.C.W. Deft. pleads guilty. and cost, ALW.D.W. Deft, pleads guilty. Preyer for judgment continued for 2 years. Deft. to appear at each July term and show goog behavior. Deft. to pay cost in this case. A.W.D, W. Deft. pleads guilty. Judgment suspended On payment of cost. Injury to property. Deft. pleads guilty. Upon .~ recommendation of State judgment suspended on ‘ payment of cost, Injury to property. Deft, pleads guilty. recommendation of Sohkicitor gudgment suspende payment of cost, dito Ou eoeas Injury to property. Deft. leads guilty. recommendation of Solicitor Sudgieat ieeoiens payment of'cost, — fat wen 3 Burning Bo oy ea | Odell King 4 months in Jail to bp Jury No. 1 being ey No.51 State vs R.E.Laneir No.83 State _ vs Harvey Lee Chambers No.40 State vs Block “alton, Roy McLelland. No.41 State vs Berry Tatum No.15 State vs Henry McDaniels No.45 State vs Fred Westmoreland, | Judgment fined $75.0) Luther Palton, Alias Tuesday, July 29th, 1919, C.C.W. DEFT, gesees guilty heretofore entered, fined $50.00 and cost, Larceny, Deft. pleads guilty. Judgment 4 months in jail with leave of commissioners to work on County farm, . Larceny. Defendants plead not guilty. Jury No.l being sworn and empanneled fin@ both defts. guilty of larceny. Judgment deft, Roy McLelland 6 months in jail with leave of commissioner to work on County farm. Deft. Luther Dalton 90 days in jail with ima leave of commissioner to work on County farm, Larceny. Deft. Called and failed Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Capias, Affray. Alias Captas as to Son Privett. Continued by consent as to. enry MeDaniels, Assault. Pleads not guilty. Jury No.1 being sworn and empanneled say they fin defendantd not guilty. tL ae MST re br Judge presid@fng,. ee mes, ; .. Wednesday, July 30th, 19191, ! Wednesday, July 30th, 1919. No.735 State j 2 No.54 vs { Mfg. Liquor. Continued for Deft, ‘oo State ; .1 Having liquor co jrary to law. Judgment that the Dink Gregory. i ete * * “4: ¥s }. Deft. be confine 11 for 4 months with leave of )Caerl Spry. { commissioners to tork on County ferm. Deft, not a a rs } to wear felon stripes, State { Having liqor contrary to law. Called and failed vs } Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias unless bond of : No.5S D.H. Hamilton. { $1000.00 is renewed in‘10 days, 4 <4 State { Having liquor contrary to lew, Judgment Deft 12 o. : vs f months in Jail to be worked on County Farm, Deft. | No.60 ee Burton Charles, { not to wear felon Stripes. By consent of Deft. t& State | ; { the sentence in this case is to begin Sept, lst ce i awd | Nok seer Weta tenes; f' 1919 end that he enter into a bond justifica bond | ry Pine { in the sum of $2000.00. for his appearance Sept ae . } 1st 1919 to the Sheréff of Iredell County. | No.4 ’ ¢ State } 3 | vs {.Cc.c.W. Continued, No.58 / i Harrison Smith { State | Store Breaking. Deft, plead not guilty. Jury No. | i vs { 1 being sworn ana empanneled find deft, guilty. No.65 » ,+4 Theodore Houser } Judgment that Deft. be confined in jail for 2 State j | years with leave to commissioners to work on vs } Having Ligor Contrary to Law. Alias Capias, ’ t County farm, Herrison Smith { 5 x : i No.63 a State { House Breaking. Deft, pleads guilty. Judgment State } : vs { 3 years in jail to be workea on County farm, vs { affray. Continued under former order, B Jess Holmes { Grover L Smith. } No.69 No.7? | State { Injury to property. Plead Guilty. Judgment that State ot _ vs } Deft. be confined in Jail 30 days with leave to vs { Fornification and Adultry, Capias, Melton Shoemaker { ! Commissioners to work on County Farm, Fred Westmoreland No.70 State { Injury to property. Plead Guilty.‘ Judgment that BLat@ront Vi vs { Deft. be confined in Jail 30 days with leave to vs f Abandonment. Capias, Wergile Shoemaker | Commissioners to work on County Farm, R.C, Grant 5 Ks. No.71 ' No,.35 . | State -f Injury to property. Suspended. | State { ove . i A vs { A.W.D.W. Sei Fa Judment Absolute for 200.00 to | Ada Shoemaker, 4 W.Y.Westmofelanda { be discharged on payment of $100.00, | No.42 i No,22 State { Forging Check, Deft. Willie Moore pleads guilty of State 4 vs . }, forging check, Roy McLe’lend pleads not guilty. vs { Mfg.Liquor. Sci Fa Judgment Absolute, | Willie Moore { Jury No.l being sworn and empanneled find the Deft. Will Bell } | Roy McLelland, |} Roy McLelland guilty.: { Judgment Willie Moore 4 months in Jail with leave of No.64 and 65 { } commissioners to work on County Farm. e State { C.C.W. & Having liquor contrary to law. Sci Fa | Judgment Deft. Roy McLelland 4 months in Jail with ie vs hui ? Judgment Absolutd, @ leave of commissioners to work on County Farm. B Harrison & . ee. No,.53 e ’ No, Q 7 State { ae State i vs 1 Fogery. Continued for state on bond to be given ye } u.& Re Soi Fa Judgment Absolute J.R. Childers j by Deft. for $150.00 _ * Bryant ' _ | Parris Bryant ' No.79 State i} 4 No.34 vs . 6, 6.9, Capias, State j Neal Hellard { ae } Burning Hotel Iredell. Sci Fa Judgment Absolute, ions ‘Joseph Hamoy { Notice to issue to Insurance Co, e State { se ‘ vs } Housebreaking, apts, .* Amos Gregory 1 ~~ , 4 i . ' wa,6¢ Having 1i trary ce y quor contr to law, arg | Gertz o aekhs ee eey. #9 Ads |. Genatiowna nee bill. ear a ° o8 With Beave be. psa) ua Cr aes tale 4 ye ‘Calfas i ” - . \. ae ; i * Cae ce fy Having Liquor contra Wednesday, July 30th, 1919, Statesville, Nee July SOth, 1919, The Grand Jury for the July Term 1919 of Iredell County Super4 | Court begs leave to submit tne following report: i A Committee of six examined the County Home for the aged end a infirm, finding therein 37 inmates; 7 males, 17 females white end 6 males and 7 females colored, Convicts, 3 colored and 1 white. The accomodations are good’sand all the Hates well cared for. We find Plenty of provisions for the year. The growing crops are fine with abundant of fruit. We find a fine herd of cattle and hogs to furnish meat for the ensuing year, The farm is in a good state of cultivation and every thing appears very Prosperohisy The jury examined the Jail-and found 16 prisoners, 5 white men and eleven colored men. The jail is well kept and appears sanitary. The jury recommends the following Hepeind, See report of Grand Jury for May therm, 1919, The very same repairs are still needed and the Jury as a body reccommend that they be attended to at once, ' A committee of three examined the Court House and found the records in offices of all the County officers well kept and preserved, The conditions of building sre still in same condition as reported by the Jury of the May term 1919, and we as beds recommend that these repairs be ° | attended to at once, Respectfully submitted, A.C. Jones Fonveman + ES insae i ie it July Term, 1919, North Caroline, Superior Court, tpedell County, July term, 1919, v8, Holland } hh Ff vs j Order & Judgment. {S.P. Holland, )} The Geath of the plaintiff C.S.Hollsnd in the above case is suggested and by leave of the Court S.J. Holland administrator of C.S, Metis Holland, comes into Court and makes himself as administrator aforesaid party plaintiff ‘to this action and takes a non-suit, wherefore it is anguad adjudged that S.J,Hollana, administrator of C.S.Holland pay the cost of the action to be taxed by .the Clerk, W.J.Adams | Judge Presiding. North Bardlina, Superior Court, Iredell County. July Term, 1919, | | | | B.S. Hollana } vs { Order and Judgment, of non-suit, S. J.Holland and Mattie Holland i The death of C,S.Holland the Plaintiff in the abdoten entitled action is suggested and by leave of the Court S.J.Holland administrator of C.S.Holland comes into Court and makes himself as administrator aforesaid | Party Plaintiff and thereupon takes a non-suit: It is thereupon adjudged that the cost 6f the action be taxed against said S,J.Holland administrator of C.S,Holland, by the Clerk of the Court, W.d,. Acems Judge Presiding. North Caro.ine, j In the Superior Court, Iredell UCounty.} July term, 1919, Jas.H.Cloaninger i vs j JUDGMENT, Charlie Torrence, { This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing that summons Wes issued returnable to may term, 1919 of-this Vourt, which summons was uly served on the defendant on April 15, 1919 and it further appearing that a verified complaint has been filed and that the bond required by the statute has not been filed by the defendant, It 1s thereupon ordered and Mducged met the phere 4s the 7 | Omer the lands described in the complaint | July Term, 1919. further recover of the defendant the sum of $75.00 damages for failure to pay note and the cost of .this action. W.J.Adams vudge *residing. * It is adjudged that if the defendant file his bond as required by statute and a meritorious answer within ten days after notice to a attorney then this judgment mey be set aside, July 30th, 1919. Zeb.V. Turlington Atty Yor SISERENIT North Carolina, | Superior Court, Iredell County. } July Term, 1919. Mrs.Julia Austin, Admx. | vs I JUDGMB SH 2; W.L. Fox. 4 This cause coming on hearing, the plaintiff voluntary takes a oy non-suit. Whereupon it is adjudged that the plaintiff pay the costs the action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. W.J.Adams Judge “residing. North Caroling,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} July Term, 1919. The Bank of North Wilkesboro, Inc., | and the Wilson Milling and Lumber i Company, Inc. 0 #VS- t 1 J.C.Paerker. This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties have compromised and finally adjusted the matters arising under the pleadings in the cause, and that the defendant has fully complied with his part of the compromise, and is adjudged the owner of the property sought to be recovered, free and discharged from the lien claimed by plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs therefore ask for a non suit, And it 1s considered,°ordered and adjudged that the said mext action be, and the same is hereby non suited, and it further adjudged that the Plaintiffs pay the cost of thé action, to be taxed by the Clerk against the plaintiffs and their bondsmen. W.J,Adems Judge Presiding. Consent Judgment. J.A.Rousseou Attorney ror Plaintiffs. J.H. Burke Attorney for Derendants. MONDAY, OCTOBER 13th., 1919, North Carolina, Iredell County. . ‘ Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County of Iredell on the 6th Monday after the lst Monday in September, 1919, the same being the 13th dag of October, 1919, when ana where His Honor Judge W.J.Adams, is present and presiding, and Honorable Hayden Clement, Solicitor, is present and prosaeuting ‘in the name of the State. M.P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve . as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: J.P.Mills, J.W. Lawrence, C.W.Green, T.L. Davidson, W.B.McNeely, Ed R.Siceloff, J.M.Grose, E.L.Long, T.W.Woodside, P,A.Shinn, W.H.Caudé#ll, F.A.Cloaninger, H.H.Renegar, T.L,Ervin, T,J.Ellis, W.M.Caldwell, G.H. ' Johnston, T.D.Smith, L.J.Brotherton, Thos, Morrow, G.C, Swisher, W.P.White, J.Hall Scroggs, E.A.Massey, A.R.Deitz, C.A,Mayhew, M.L.Davis, W.L.Ostwalt, B.C.Deal, H.B.Fulp, B.F.Bell, J.A.Conner, C.E.Haethorne, C.E.Mills, | ALE, Beaver, J.L.Ballard, The following 6°99 nad’ lawful men were sworn as Grand Jurors tor the term, as follwws: . 3 W.M.Caldwell, B.F.Bell, T.D.Smisth, H.B.FPulp, C.E.Mills, E.A, Massey, ,J.Hall Scroggs, J.W.Lewrence, A.R.Beitz, L,J,Brotherton, J,M. Grose T.J.Ellis, J.P, Bilia, C. 8, ree G.H. Johnston, G, C.Swisher, T,L.Ervin, Thos. Morrow, J.P.Mills was sworn 48 foreman of the Grand jury. C.M.Swisher was sworn es officer of the Grand jury. The following naméd jurora could not be found: W.H.Caudill and W.L.Ostwalt, ’ T.L,Davidson, sick; J.A,Conner and E.L.Long, jurors were eXcused, The following good and lawful, men were sworn as Petty* jurors: for the term: Pe a ‘ C.W.Green, W.B, McNeely, Ed R,Siceloff, T.W.Woodside, P.A, Shinn, FA, Cloaninger, H.H.Renegar, W.P. White, C.A,Mayhew, M.L. Davis, B.C.Deal, A.E. Yeaver, J.L, Ballard No.1 State vs Rush Nicholson No.2 State vs Raleig Miller John Ab Allison No. 3 State vs Raleigh Miller No. 4 State vs Scarlia “avis Jim McCarter No. 5 State vs Ed Hegler No.6 State vs Jim Talford No.7 State vs Fred Caldwell No. 8 State vs Carter Reddick No. 9 State vs James Carlton N6. 10 State vs C.C.Harpe No. 12 State vs Harvey Lee Houston Son Privett Henry McDeniels No. 14 State vs Tom Pickens 8 Monday, October, 13th., 1919, ) } A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. Continued. Murder. Alias Capias. Retailing. Continued under former order. Larceny. Defendant called and failed and Capies,. Hi Be is Alies Capias. Larceny. Alias Capias. Abandonment. Alias Capias. A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. False Pretense. Nol Pros wkth leave. LEW aAlies Capias. Affrey. Capias as to Privett, Alias Capias, No. 15 State vs Tom Pickens No.16 State vs David Gaither No.17 State vs | Will Lewis | No.18 | State | vs | Robert Woodward | No.19 State - VS | Will Bell No.21 | State vs | John Teague | State | vs | Len Bryant Farris Bryant | No.22 No.23 State vs Kelly Souther Carl Souther. No.24 State | vs |Kelly Souther Carl Souther No.25 State "Vs Frank Lineberger No.27 State vs Burley Myers Flake Holland No.28 State 1 v Monday, October, 13th., 1919, L.& R. Continued. A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. A.W.D.W. Nol Pros with Leave. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Mfg. Liquor. Alias Capies. Larceny. Alias Capias. Alias Capias. c.C.W. Alias Capias. Affray. Alies Capias. Elopement. Alias Capias. Heving Liquor Contrary to Law. Continued Under Former Order. Having Liquor Contrary to Law, Continued Under Former Order. ~ Alias Capias,. No,.30 State vs w.Y.Westmoreland No.3d2 State vs Sarl Allison No.354 State vs Wayne Norman No.35 State vs Bud Millsaps No.36 State vs Spirus Calfas No.39 State vs Grover L.Smith. No.40 State vs Herrison Smith No.41l State vs Harrison Smith. No.42 State vs Dink Gregory No’. 44 State vs | Fred Johnson No.45 State vs Neil Hellard | No.46 State vs Amos Gregory No.47 State vs: Will Perkins Monday, October 15th., 1919. ; 9( A.W.D.W. Alias Capies. : A.W.D.W. Defendent called and failed... Judgments Nici Sci Fa end Capias. : C.C.W. Nol Pros With Leave. Abandonment. Continued. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Nol Pros With Leave, Affray. Continued Under Former Order. C.C.W. Nol Pros With “eave. Having Liguor Contrary to Law. Nol Pros With Leave. Mfg. Liquor. Deit.called & i giled qicr Ler fA 4 iieres A.W.D.W. Plea not guilty. Verdict guilty of simple assault. Judgment suspended upon payment of cost. 5 C.C.W. Detendant called and failed Judgment Nici Sci Fa and Captias, ' ~s ‘ H.B.L.& R. Alias Capias. A.W.D.W. Continued Under Former Order. No.48 State vs Fred Westmoreland No.49 State vs Y | Lester Flowe ; ' | | No.76 - | State VY | vs 3 | -ester Flow | No.50 /| State V | vs | H.L. Lackey | No.58 | State i} VS iM. A.Beam No.59 |; State | vs | Johnson Conner. }No.67 | State |; VS 'Geo. Anthony ,_}io.78 “ | State vs George Anthony | Pbk State | vs | Archie Morris | /\No.77 |/ | State vs Henry Alexander No.79 State vs H.C. Lackey. 0.57 State ‘Vs Marvin Sherrill MONDAY, October 13th., 1919. Fornification and aduldry. Pleads guilty. House breaking. Deft. pleads guilty. Judgment 5 x years in State Prison, House breaking. Deft. pleads guilty. Judgment 5 years in State Prison, sentence to begin at expiration of sentence in 49, Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Nol Pros With Leave. Selling Liquor. Continued for Deft. on affidavit. A.W.D.W. Deft. by Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of Assault with deadly weapon. C.C.W. Deft. by Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of Carry Concealed Weapon. A.W.D.W. Deft. by Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of assault with deadly weapon. L.& R. Deft. represented by Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of larceny of property under $20.00. Deft. being represented by Counsel waives L.& R. bill and pleads guilty of the Larceny of property under value of $20.00 A.W.D.W. Pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empanneled find the Deft. guilfy of assault with deadly weapon. Selling Liquor. Deft. pleads not guilty. Jury No. Still on triab, ‘oe ¥ 4 . TUESDAY, October, 14th., 1919. | MONDAY, October 15th., 1919. —t, Murder. In this case the Graaury comedZinto open > | No.57 cesar Court in a body and being polled, and each : State etailing. member answering to his name. the said jury) ~ returne@_into the Court a true bill of indictment, for murder against Ralph Conner, Trial continued over from yesterday. _Jury No. 1 atter being sworn and empannelled return vs vs ; Marvin Sherrill ver@ict guilty of retailing. 1 Ralph Conner denefarr une No.38 State Having too much liquor. Deft pleads guilty. raer agaixst Sinclatr Conner. 41 ider. is case/Grand Jury cemejinzto open vs a ? t in ody an eing p ed,a each D.H. Hamilton Sinelair Conner mewiber angwering ty\his name. Th aid - j _retyryeHintd Cyurt a e Will for':s I No.52 State vs Clarence Hatchet L.H. Souther: No.74 State vs | A.Burt Cornelius | No.62 State vs | A. H. Baker | No.63 | State vs (WH. or) Bill Barnhardt | No.64 & 65 | State vs | Luther Bullyboy | Mack Spry | No.51 /\ §tate vs | Hal Cook | No.70 | State vs Sam Stevens No.55 & 56 State vs Dan Russell No.84 & 85 State vs Adem Cranford No.33 State . Va eng Berry Tatum Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Deft. Hatchet pleads guilty. L,H.Souther, called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fé and Capias, L.&R. Deft. pleads guilty. Judgment 6 months,in jail to be worked at farm for aged HAAS Liye S Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Deft. called and failed. Judgment Nisi Séi Fa and Capias. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Deft called and failed Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Plea not guilty. Jury M0 ot Cesethtey ote empannelled returns verdict guilty of moe than one quart of liquor in violation of law. C.C.W. Pleads guilty. Judgment upon recommendation of the Solicitor is that the deft. pay a fine of $50.00 and cost. Pick Pocket.or Attempted Larcdény. Plea not guilty. Jury No. 2 béing sworn and empannelled return verdict guilty. Retailing. Pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled returns verdict guilty in each case of retailing. Retailing. Deft. called and failed. Judgment Nist Sei Fa and Capias.in each case. A wv Larceny. Plead not guilty. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelied return verdict not guilty. TUESDAY, October 1l4th., 1919. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. October term, 1919. No.60 & 8 State ( vs Special Venire. Sinclair Conner ? { f ; } j } Ralph Conner. The defendants, Sinclair Conner and Kalph Conner, in the custody of the High Sheriff of Iredell County was brought into open Court, being represented by L.C.Caldwell, E.B,dones and R.T.Weatherman and placed upon their arraignment. The Solicitor for the State, Hon.Hayden Clement, having called upon the prisoners to stand and hold up their right hand, and having made known to them that they stood charged by the names of lelph Conner and Sinclair Conner in the indictment read to them. The prisoners plead not guilty and for their trial placed themselves upon God and their country. The prisoners, being at the bar, it is ordered by the Court, that the High Sherift of Iredell County summons One Hundred and Twenty Five good and lawful men in Iredell County, not in the Townships of Davidson, Coddle Creek ana fallstown, to appear and be in attendance upon the Court Thursday morning, October 16th, 1919, at ten o'clock A.M., and not depart the Court without leave, The defendants waive the drawing of jurors from the box. W.J.Adams Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. October term, 1919, No.38 State vs D.H. Hamilton At a Superior Court held for the County of Iredell in the om of Statesville, N.c., on the 13th day of October, 1919, Present Hon. Wed Adams, Judge, This action having been called and the defendant, D,H.Hamilts having predd gulity and by consent of Hon. Hayden Clement, Solicitor, he facts to ascertain the disposition of the Automobile seized in this ac and taken from the defendant were heard, | j TUESDAY. October 14th, 1919, The Court finds as a fact that on the 3lst day of Dec., 1918, that the defendant, D.H.Hamilton, executed and delivered to J.D.H, Isenhour on mortgage on the said car for $600.00 borrowed money; that the said mortgaged was duly recordee in Cabarrus County, in Record of Wlortgages No. 42, page 2, on the Sist day of Dec. 1918; that both D.H, Hamilton and J.D.H. Isenhour, Mortgagee and Mortgagor at the time said mortgage was given resided in Said Cabarrus County; that there is now due and unpaid on said mortgage the sum of $361.82. with interest ot $600.00 from Dec. 31st. 1918, to June 18th, 1919, and interest on $361.82 from June 18th, 1919, until paid, It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said Automo* bile seized by the Sheriff of: Iredell County, be and it is hereby condem- ed to sale under the statute and the Sheriff of Iredell County is hereby directed to sell the said car after 20 day's advertisement according to law at the Court House door in Statesville, NeGy ty the highest bidder for cash, and out of the proceeds of such sale first, pay to J.D.H. Isenhour the sum of $361.82, with interest on $600.00 from Dec. Slst, 1918, to June 18th, 1919, and interest on $361.82 from June 18th, 1919, until paid, and the balance to be paid out as provided by the Statute in such cases, W.J.Adams vudge Presiding. No.2 State vs Carl Allison No.o1 State vs C.F.Claywell John Setzer No.73 State vs Lee Coggins No.37 State WEDNESDAY, October 15th., 1919. A.W.D.W. A.W.D.W. A.W.D.W. Forgery. 4 Deft.. pleads guilty. Upon recommendation of the Soldcitor, Judgment is suspended upon payment of cost. Forfeiture hereto. fore entered is sticken out. Transferred to Juvehile Court as to C.F, Claywell. Nol Pros With Leave as to John Setzer. Plead not guilty. Jury No.1 being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of A.W.D.W.| j } } Pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 being sworn | No.43 State ' Larceny. Trial continued over from yesterday (Oct. |W.R.Smith 1c,L. Sherrill THURSDAY, ,OQctober 16th., 1919, v8 - 15th). The jury bringing in a verdict af . not guilty of larceny. State Under sentence and bond to smrrender himself to the vs High Sheriff of Iredell.County, N.C., Sept. lst., Burton Charles 1919. alled and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. Honk it- No.54 AState ° C.C.W. Trial continued over fron yesterday (Oct.15th) vs ae The jury say they find the defendant guilty Robert Harris On: CE. es vs and empannelled for their verdict and they. J.R.Childers State produces its evidence. At close of ~ the, States evidence the Court in tabs : No.60 € - Y€s jurors and orders a mistrial State with leave to the Solicitor to send another tvs bill’ to the grand jury if he see fit so to’ ‘Ralph Conner Murder.} In obedience to the order heretofore made in pleads | this case a Special venire of One Hundred not } twenty five good and lawful men were summon- No.20 State vs J.W.Campbell No.53 State vs Robert Harris No.54 State vs Robert Harris No.69 State vs Mickey Johnson | No.43 State vs W.R.Smith C.L.Sherrill No.80 State vs Geo, Patterson Seduction. Nuisance, Attempted Larceny. do. a 4 Continued, | | { } | | i | i Plead not guilty. Jury No.2 being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they| find the defendant not guilty of Nuisance.| | | Pleads not guilty. Jury No. 2 being sworn and empannelled.: contintedvover:to Thursday. | Larceny or Pick Pocket. Deft. called and failed. Judgment N4si Sci Fa and Capias. Pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled for their verdict. Continued over to Tursday, Oct.1é6th., 1919 Defendant being represented by Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of forceablé Liciter tresspass. Upon recommendation of So prayer for judgment is continued for two years, conditioned on the defendant's good behavior during that time. Further condt- tioned upon the defendant's paying the cost of the action and giving bond in $100) for his appearance at each October term for two years and show his good behaviors Lt asda Sinclair Conner guilty.| ed to appear at the Court House Thursday Oct. 16th, 1919,at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. The prisoner's being at the bar in the custody of M.P.Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, whose prisoners they are, the following jury were drawn from the regular jurors and from the Special venire } and sworn and empannelled; W.P.White, A.E.Beaver, J.L.Ballard, M.L.Davis, C.R.Stone, A.P.Sherrill, J.L. Grose, R.F.Gaither, R.M.Bagwell, N.A.Stine, S.0.Brown, and I.N.Smith. SE Ee A ep | North Carolina, | Iredell County. Hon.W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding: We, the Grand Jury for October Term, 1919, have visited the County Hone, by committee, and find the condition of the building and grounds in good shape, and the inmates were well pleased with their | treatment, There are forty two inmates; sixteen white women and ten white men; eight colored women and eight colored men. We found six inmates in the Infirmatory. All bedding and furniture is clean and sanitary. We 'found the farm in good state of cultivation, being improved by sowing of clover and the use of manure. A herd of cattle provide milk and butter | and sufficient hogs are kept to supply the larger part of the meat, We visited the prisoners stockade in which are kept two white and five colored convicts. The conditions were found good, We, visited the jail in a body and found fifteen prisoners; nine colored and six white. We found the jail well kept and appears clean and sanitary, We also visited the different offices in the Court House and found every thing well kept and the records well cared for. We would recommend that the cement floor in the vault of the, Register's office be repaired. We also recommend that the pipes that go from the furnace be looked after an repaired. We also recommend that a fibre or runner be placed on the stairs leading to and from the Court room to lesson the noise that may arise theref This the 15th day of October, 1919. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:30 o'clock A.M., October 17th, No.60 State vs Ralph Conner Sinclair Conner This Honorable Court takes recess until Saturday, Oct. 18th., 1919, at 9 o'clock, A.M.. Thursday, October 16th., 1919. Respectfully submitted, J.P.Milis Foreman Grand Jury. i } 4 ay, ee a ne FRIDAY, October 17th., 1919. » 1919. { Murder. Continued over from Thursday, Oct. 18th., 1919. Continued over to tomorrow, Friday Oct. 18th. ,| { 1919. { he a Judge fae TPE. a 7 OCTOBER 16th., 1919. lio 57 State Vs. Marvin Sherrill. Motion for new trisl addressed to the disc juc re presiding. On the ground, First: hat the * aga inst the weight oi the evidence. COntte ground covered testimony. On the ground of th efendeat ve \ i w4lU0. been orinfon that nd Not tc »f--State vs none ae. Let t] defendant > State vs D.H.Hamilton. Gefaidant be confined the Aged and Int Not to weer + a tar 2 . fe see VOgRINS. fendant pay a fine o1 ¥oU An he #0. 60 cnd No. 61. Stete Vs Ralph Conner and Sincleir Conner: of eae prisorerg move to set eside the verdict apsinst the weight i e evidence, “he Court in the exercise of itz éiecretion eenies kha not. cu. “he prisoners move to zs side the verdict and be eréhted a new trial for alleged errors © e Court commit ted in the Bean ob Jecti mate evidence and the charge of the Court. Overruled. Exception. Sentenoe:Let the priscrers stand up. You ure aware, of course, that yon have been convicted a 20 of a 9 oF ofa epee y sheriff of this county. cts 30° far ag have been able end the counsel Fear ee ée well as your own covagel heve done also w ' “i Thursday, October l16th., 1919, We also recommend that the pipes that go from the furnace be looked after and repaired, We also recommend that a fibre or runner be placed on the staing leading to and from the Court room to lesson the noise that may arise therefrom, Respectfully submitted, J.P.Milis Foreman Grand Jury. 15th day of October, 1919. FRIDAY, October 17th., 1919. a/ dA This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:30 o'clock A.M., October 17tn,, 1919, from Thursday, Oct. 18th., 1919. No.60 State Murder. Continued over V3 Continued over to tomorrons Friday Oct.18th., Ralph Conner 1919, Sinclair Conner [This Honorable Court takes recess until Saturday, Oct. 18th., 1919, A.M.. 4 / fp nil’, _“*V/ V dan, a Judge Pres fing e ~State vs Mack Spry. ‘ ‘ ‘ ’ ‘ ¥ State tha det : f ‘ Pt re vs D.H.Hamtiton. » » 4 Pas isS etend of am ~ ¥ or v ba Vo your ree, thet 8 demty she been able. am own oC vuagel vn ruve been convicted riff of this county. a the covnsel repre- hive done sulseo “fat olutely iair ‘he ahe Stete of North Ceroling in the Supericr Uourt is lreaell v county nélph Conner ana 4t the October fem, 191%. incleir vouner the vrisoners in this action, .elph Conner ana Since lasix Conner, paving been prosecuted in this court @na bill of judictment charging them with the murder ot Lloyd Cloaninger, and having been auly convicted oi murder in the first degree by a jury duly chosen, sv end impeneled, and the Solicitor on behelf oi the State heaving rirsyed the judge: t the Vourt tpon the verdict of tre juny duly returned, it is now orcered spe Og inesed, Ryo het ep? ks db RY BES 1 omented to the cus iy of e She ‘f of Lredell Vounty, who shall deliver seid | I i » custody of the werden or the deputy warden cl the State's PY caig warden retein eeid crisoners in his custody until sriday the cls day oi Novenber, 191¥, on which dey said prisoners, nealph conne Sincleir Conner, shull be teken into the permanent death chamber in 1 Stete Penitentiary proviaed by authority of lew, und that) the warden oj e Penitentiary, or in cuse of his death, inability or absence, the ywarden ot the Penitentiary, between the hours ol six o'clock i morniag end six o'clock in the afternoon, sheli cause to ness through the boaies ot the prisomers, and through the body of each oi them # cwrent of electricity of sufficient intensity to cause t heir death md tre death ot each of them, and thst the arolication ot salo current of electricity be continued until seid prisoners, halph © onner , ' t r | nad Sincl#ir vonmwr, sre dead. | It is further ordered that this judgment um sentence of death | 3 3 is cause, und certified copy hereot be is ¢ t waraen of the + ty r — a J) if MO a Ee a 4:8. 8 6 S884 OR FES eee OES Judge fresiding. ee Prisoners give notice of apresl to the Supreme Vourt in open Court. (surther notice weived. Apreal bond in the swm of $50 adjudged suiiicient. it is sumitted by the state thrmgh its solicitor that helph Conner and Simelsir Couner sre yupers end uneble to give the appeal bond, end thet they ere hereby authorized to appeal without civing bonG ashe toregoing entry is mede by the Solicitor ond the defendants’ covusel. tFrisoners sllowed iifteen days irom the sajownment of this cowt in which to serve notice of upreal to Supreme Court. stete fifteen days thereafter to make up its counter cease. wOe 46--otate Vs. srea sestmorelend: it appearing to the Vourt thet the defendant is under sixteen years of age, prayer for judgment is catinued for a term of two years upon the peyment oi the costs. Lefendant to appeer at each criminel te to show his mood behavior. yl00 &enpeararnce bond, 0. b4--stete Vs. hobert Harris: Zo be confined to jeil end sssigmd to work at the Home ior the Aged aré AIntirm of Iredell County for » term of four months. Bot to wesr felon's stripes. wO--66--state Vs. Len sussell: Let the prisoner be coniined to jail and assigned to We at. eee sl the towe ior the Ageé and Infirm of ilredgll County ior f oox mon yy: ~° b-e State vs. awe e Let- him «¢ os nome ic he int County ior & teri oi sixty days, gent en ce in wOe Oe ho. S9--state Ve. Johnson vonner. Let him be coniined to jail : assi ere Oo work 7 oi howan Vounty tor & tem of nine oiths ic wes! stripes. ¢ nO. BO /e---- State vs Geo. ANthony. Let rim be confined to jail am a: ior the agea ene Infirm of Iredell vo nt) Vbe---State vs George Anthony. Let him te assigned to work et the home of liedell County for & term oi sixty days, ation of the sentence in io 67. wot to wes C&S8C6 e wo TU--State Vs wet h ir ne of lredeli County stripes. Ao Tle--state Vs Archie Lorris. ¢ frayer tor judgnent cont inved puyzent ol costs, detendant to execute to appear at each crivinal term tw sg! 0. To--- State vs Leroy Miller. vontinuea by: + TTeest: te VS. ven ry set him nays tine of Oe of -~~-State vs ¢.C.Smith. rr osecution, and unon 1 ol the v ostete, and by consent dgeiencant, “ueie@idamt pleasas oi 6n &ssault on person by Wurt thet the defendent hss snadjustment with tl © e T 1a 1 % A 4186QC@i14 expiration of the onthe roads ielon's Lrendations the é enale & nan over the are ; It iuwther appearing to the prosecution, which ig satisfactory to sll parties, on recoumenastion o1 the etate and by the prosecution jucgment is susppenced upon psyment ot costs. “O. EY-eState Vs. dJosenh Hamoy. #01 pros with leave. “Oe £6,-----eState vs F,H.Upright and D.C.Pethnel. @ Canies. / HO, WY-nneeeee State vb H.C.Lackey. § $44 %* fw ¥ 40. 42......Stete Vs. Dink wregory: ten days to renew his bond. Capies not to issue GAA i Sareea einRiNtnnnanatihcer Lens Sentence mmreesies “ema eaaree Snare B MONDAY, October 20th.,1919. (Oct. Term, 1919.) The Honorable Court convened at 10 o'clock, A.M., Oct. 20th., 1919, for the dispach of business. Judge W.J.Adams, presiding. O0.L.Woodside, Deputy Sheriff, acting for M.P.Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the names of the follow- ing good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the second week of this term > to wit: J.E.Powers, W.L.Cook, Geo.L.Blackwelder, W.R.Summers, J.L. Abernathy, N.F.Owens, 0.G.Turbyville, C.L.Furr, T.I.Nixon, J.D.Cranford, M.D.Goodman, R.L.Alexander, Clarence Stimpson, J.F.Jones, N.E.Brown, A.N. Abernathy, C.C.Freeze, W.A.Gabriel, W.M.Lundy, J.B.Houston, &.B. Stewart, R.B.Kestler, L.C.Steele. I.R.Reid is returned not being found. No.8 The R.R.Mfg.Co. vs Continued. S.R.Brown & Son. No. 15 O.T, Deal vs Non-suited. Dr.E.E.Little and Dr.L.V.Cloaninger. No.24 J.L.Sherrill vs Continued. B.M.Wilhelm No.26 C.E.Mills, H.O.Stééle, and E,Morrison vs Settled. Fred A. Thomas No.36 +redell *armers Union Warehouse Co, vs Continued, Hy K. Wi: et al No,38 Mrs.Mary L.Campbell et vs Continued, William Campbell et al No.39 |Louisa Hayes, et al vs Continued. William Campbell, et al |No.53 Carrie Wilson | vs Continued, @isy Woodside and -B. Stockton No.55 Octavia Tomlin vs Daisy Woodside, et al No.63 0.1.d9ordon, et al vs W.A.Campbell, et al No,.64 Mrs.Kate Goodin vs Miss Lane Crater No,67 W.W.Rankin Co, V8 J,Will Deaton and Emma E,Deaton No,.68 Locke Moore vs W.D.,Hines Director General of R.R's (Sou.Ry Co.) No.69 Page & Moore vs W.D.Hines Director General of R.R.'s (Sou. Ry. Co.) No. 70 W.L.Davis vs W.D.Hines Director General of R.R's. (Sou. Ry Co.) No.4 Statesville Lumber Co, ; vs J.E.Patten & D,W.Adams No.4 C.B. Davis vs L.H.Melchor & Geo.A,Morrow MONDAY, October 20th., 1919, Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued for Deft. on affidavit. The following jurors, to-wit: Geo.L. Blackwelder, J.,L.Abernathy, N.F.Owens, C.L. Furr, M.D.Goodman, R.L.Alexander, N.E. Brown, A.N, Abernathy, C.C,.Freeze, W.A.Gabriel, J.B% Houston, and C.B.Stewart, being sworn and empanneliled for their verdict say they find the following issues; 1, Did the defendants obtain from the plaintif the sum of $5000.00 as the purchase price of land referred to in the complaint by means of false representations, as alleged in the complaint? Answer; No t so, what damage is plaintiff entitled to recover? 3 | | | MONDAY, | No.11l Jessie B,.Van Camp, et al } vs’ | Mart Carson, et al ) | No.12 Jessie B.Van Camp, et al vs | P.B, Kennedy & H.C.Hunter No.45 P,B.Kennedy xx V$ H.C.Hunter No.11 _Jessie B.Van Camp, et al vs Mart Carson, et al. October 20th, 1919, Defendant is allowed t®@ file answer, Continued, amendment to Continued, Continued Plaintiff allowed to amend complaint in No. 11, 12, and 45, This Honerable Court takes recess until Tuesday morning, October 2lst., at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. 4 a Y g J Af 5 i MN Cf bean, Judge hata: sit f cee A OCT Ctl Re ite ¥ | a WEDNESDAY , mo~ni Set.22nd, : Tuesday morning, Oct. 2ist., 1919. ; ’ ngs V nd., 1919 This Honorable Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. Oct. 2lst This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 1919, for the dispatch of business. Judge W.J.Adams, Presiding. 9:30 o'clock, A.MB, Oct. 22nd., 1919. No.19 . Statesville Lumber Co. | Jury No.2 being sworn and empannelled say they Ee rity: Mee vs | find for their verdict, to-wit: vs Continued for defendant. Barger Bros. ! In what amount, if any, are the defendants R.M. Hudson indebted to the plaintiff? Ans. None. In what amount is the plaintiff indebted to ee .” the defendant? | J.A. Davidson Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled for their Ans, $98.89 with interest from vs : verdict find the issues submitted to them as | J,C,Roseman follows; ; (1) Was the plaintifi's horse injured by the Tis Honorable Court takes recess until 9:30 o'clock, A. Mj negligence of the defendant as alleged in the : complaint? Wednesday morning, Oct.2énd., 1919. Answer: It was. i. 4 Jw. (2) What damage, if any, is plaintiff Wp- O eae | entitled to recover? . : y Answer: $170.00 with interest from date vudge Presiding.7 s of accident. | No.27 a ae . John Caldwell, Admr. of John eae On trial. Continued over to : vs ) Thursday, Oct. 23rd. 1919. E.Morrison Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled for their | B.A. Troutman and L.L. Troutman, trading i : vs verdict say they find the issues as follows: ’ . | as Mooresville Furniture Co. j Carolina Motor Co. ,& (1) In what amount, if any, are the : and 0.L.Barringer. detendant$sindebted to the pleintiff by breach of contract as alleged in the complaint? | Tis Honorable Court takes recess until Thursday morning, Answer: $265.00 with interest from Aug. | Oct. 23rd., 1919, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. lst.; 2 (2) Was the failure of the Carolina Motor Company to deliver the car to the plaintiff °~ '\Yf V4 caused by the refusal of the defendant O.L. 7X, Barringer to deliver said car to the Carolina Judge fresiaing’. Motor Company in accordance with his contract? = Answer; Yes. _ No.19 Statesville Lumber Co. The Court being of the opinion that the jury -VS- probably misconstrued the instructions of the Barger Bros. Court to the jury, in the exercise of its discretion sets aside the answer to each of the issues in this case, Oh tae No.54 A.A.Sides, et al This case came on for trial upon an agreed -VS< statement of facts, Judgment was rendered 4s appears of record. The plaintiff gave notice = of appeal to the Supreme Court, and further notie waived, Appeal bond in the sum of $50. adjudged sufficient, Summons, complaint, answered and amended pleadings, together with the agreed statement of facts and judgments of the Clerk 8 of the Court will constitute the case on appeals eS pee, 1919, No.27 John Caldwell, Admr. John E,Caldwell. vs B.A. Troutman and L.L. Troutman, doing business and trading as Mooresville | Furniture Co. of Te eed A I OI el Ce RS eet a ee oe No.31 Walter M,Houpe vs W.W.Holland, Admr. W.W.Houpe. of No.43 Minnie Smith vs Sam Smith No,.49 | W.W.Rankin Co. ( vs | A.A.Neill No.62Z | Mooresville Motor Co. vs | E.S.Mills ; No.58 D.E. Turner & Co. vs Dr.C.L. Smith No.4 tlerchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville. vs D.A.Beem and L.A. Beam No.37 ees Tucker & S.E.Harmon THURSDAY morning, Oct. 23rd., 1919. Tis Honerable Court convened at 9:30,o'clock, A.M., Oct. 23rd,, for the dispatch of business. Continued, Jury No. 2 being sworn and empannnelled for their verdict say they find the issues as” follows: (1) Was the death of plaintiff's intestate caused by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: No (2) id the intestate by his own negligence osnteieate to his injury and death as alleged in the answer? Answer; (3) Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to the death of his dnbestate as alleged in the answer? Answer: (4) What damages, if any, is plainti entitled to recover?. Answer; CONTINUED because of the absence of the plaintiff by reason of his evading the draft laws for Military service. If he is not here will take a non-suit ( Were plaintiff and defendant inter= married as alleged in the complaint? ‘ Answer: Yes. (2) Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina, twWo years preseeding the filing of the complaint? ° Answer: Yes. (3) Did the defendant commit adultry 48 alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, Continued by consent, Continued by consent. ff Continued by consent, Defendant allowed time to file amended x No, No. 45° NontheCand linea, | In the Superior Court, Iredeil County.] October Perm, 1919. Minnie Smith } oU2 Gk = YT. vs i Sam Smith. t Tis cause coming on to be heard at this term before Judge W.J. Adems and a jury and being heard and a jury and being heard and the jury having answered the issues submitted in the affirmative as set out in the the record, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff, Minnie Smith and the defendant, Sam Smith be, and the same are hereby dissolved absolutely. It is further ordered that the cost be taxed by the Clerk of this Court as provided by Statute. W.0.Adams Judge Presiding. North Carolina,|] In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | October Term 1919. 29 J.A.Davidson vs { JUDGMENT. J.C,.Roseman 1 This cause coming on to'be heard at this term of the Court and being heard before His Honor W.J.Adems and a jury and His Homor having | submitted to a jury, and the jury having answeréd the following issues as follows, to-wit: 1. Was the plaintiff's horse injured by the negligence of the defendant as Alleged in thé complaint? SS Answer: It was. 2. What demages, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover ? Answer: It is therefore considered ope adjudged $170.00 with interest from date of accident. — ) court that -W.S.Beam j | B.A. Troutman and L.L. Troutman, State of North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, County of Iredell. i October, 1919, Term. No.71 : Partners trading and doing business as Mooresville Furniture Compamy. ) PLAINTIFFS. - CONSENT .JUDGMENT, “#VS% E.1.DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY DEFENDANT This cause coming on to be heard at the October, 1919, Term of 7 the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honer, W.J.Adams, Judge present and presiding, and &x being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs and defendant have agreed to compromise, settle and 5 ! adjust all matters of difference arising out of past transactions and out of| the pleadings herein upon the defendant paying to the plaintiffs the sum of | ONE HUNDRED FORTY EIGHT DOLLARS AND THIRTY CENTS ($148.30) and interest | thereon from S$0th January, 1916. If IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND decreed that the plaintiffs do have recover the sum of $148.30 and interest thereon from 30th January, 1916 . i in full settlement and release and discharge of all claims, demands, actions rignts of actions, now or heretofore existing, either at law or in equity and from any judgment that mey have been rendered, and from liability for payment of any further sum or sums of money or for render of other satisfac-| tion; the defendant to pay costs of this action. W.J.Acdams Judge Presiding. WE CONSENT: H.P.Grier Attorney for Plaintiffs, Attorneys for defendants. North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ] Oct. Term, 1919. No.30 Zeb.V. Long vs Joseph Sherrill,(Col) This cause coming on to be heard before His Honer, W.J.Adaems at this the Oct. Term of Iredell Superior Court of Iredell County, WiOce and appearing to the Court upon motion of the plaintiff, Zeb.V.Long, in said that all Sette aan soon enaunie plaintiff and defendant*shas been settl erefore ordered and adjudged b d:ac be and the same is hereby non-suited, = 7 ee “5 It is hereby further ordered and ad [4 the defendent fay all costs of this action. adjudged by the Court that This Gct. 23rd., 1919. W.J.Agems udge es ng. North Carolina,| Superior Court, Iredell County.| October Term, 1919. \A. A. Sides & others -vs- JUDGMEN (C.E,Sides & others This cause coming on for hearing at this term of the Superior Court, before His Honor W.J.Adams, Judge upon the facts agreed to by the parties to this action, and the Court being of the opinion that the | petition for the sale, for partition, of the tract of land known as the Home Place, consisting of 211 acres, more or less, and designated as the third tract in the sixth paragraph of the plaintiff petition, is premature: Therefore,it is considered and adjudged that the petition for sale of said tract, for partition and the same is hereby dismissed, and the judgment of the Clerk of the Superior Court, for the sale of said land is over-ruled. And it further adjudged that the judgment of the Clerk for the sale of the other Sins of land described in the plaintiff petition, is hereby affirmed. W.J.Adams wucge Presiding In loth / WoW Judjcia} District.» . ~ (be Page 275 fer esa R TEL prseng bein?) North Carolina,] In the Superior Court, Iredell County.] October Term, 1919. No.34 1/2 C.E.Earp -vs- UDGMENT. J.A. Thomas ~ This’ cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term “of Court by his Honor, W. J, Adams , Judge Presiding, it is considered, order-= ied, and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of | $155.88, the same being two thirds of the money arising from the sale of | cotton crop raised by the plaintiff on the defendant's land during the year 1918, with interest on said sum from December 20th, 1916, until paid. It is further adjudged that the plaintiff and defendant ealt pay one-haif of the costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. - W.J.Adems Judge Presiding... No.4 | representations as alleged in the complaint ? ANSWER: No North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County.] October Term, 1919. No,2s Boyce Lumber CO.} -VS- JUDG BREN F. W.A.Setzer. 1 This cause coming on to be heard,and being heard before His Honor, W.d.Adams, Judge, at the October Term, 1919, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that all the matters in contro versy in this action have been compromised and settled as follows; Te plaintiff will recover of the defendant the sum of $426.00, | and the plaintiff pay the costs of action:- It is therefore on motion of counsel for the plaintiff ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff do have and recover of the defendant, W.A.Setzer the sum of $426.00. It is further adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, W.J.Adams Judge Presiding. By consent of W.AsBristol and Dorman Thompson Att'ys. for Plaintiff. W.C.Feimster Att'y for Defendant. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) October Term, 1919. No.4 emma C.B.Davis | _ “¥8< } JUDGMENT. L.H.Melchor and Geo.A.Morrow.} This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding, and # jury, when and where the following issues were submitted to the jury: . 1. Did the defendants obtain from the plaintiff the sum of $5,000.00 as the purchase price of land referred to in the complaint by means of false) | North Carolina,| 2. If so, what damage is plaintiff entitled to recover ? ANSWER: - And the jury for its verdict, having answered said issues in favor the defendants and against the plaintiff, It is, therefore, considered of the plaintiff the costs of action, to be taxed by the Clerk. W. J. Adama Judge Presiding, North Caroline,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.] October Term, 1919. No.65 w.W.Rankin Co. } -vs- j UDGMENT. 'z.G.Hudspeth. | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court 'pefore Judge W.J.Adams and bein heard, and it appearing that the summons was served on the defendant R.G.Hudspeth on March 135th., 1919, and it ‘further appearing that the duly verified complaint was filed on May 27th., 1919, and that no answer has been filed. It further appearing that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $270,54 bearing date 'of March 8th., 1915, and bearing interest from date,said indebtedness being evidenced by a note, which is fully set out in the conplaint. It further appearing that a payment of $31.71 was made on April 17th., 1917, another of $5¥00 on March 15th., 1919, and other of $5.00 on April 15th., 1919. It further appearing that there is still due on said note the sum of $295.59 on April 15th., 1919. It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $295,59 with interest from April 15th., 1919 at the rate of six per cent and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. W.d. Adams cuage Presiding, Superior Court, Iredell County. } October Term, 1919. No.9 —— Walter A.Frost & Co, 4 -vs- 4 JUDGMENT. | J.K.Morrison Gro. & Pro. Co.] This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, W.J.Adems, Judge Presiding, and it appearing that the parties to this action have adjusted all matters in controversy, and the plaintiff having taken a voluntary non-suit. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the defendant recover of the Plaintiff costs of action, to be taxed by the Clerk. sea epestatngs Judge *residing. ; } i snwih Garolinds | In the Superior Court, |. @ _ |North Varoline,| m In. Superior Court, Iredell County.|} ' October Term, 1919. 4 Iredell County. $ October Term, 1919, No.7 No.52 | Oe oo .W.Rankin Co. _ Eugene Morrison | w.W { -vVs- J ie . ; JUDGMENT. i Yo.52 | vs j UDGMENT. O.L.Barringer and Carolina | Motor Company. t This cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing that the : ‘ This cause coming on to be heard at the October Term, 1919, of’ |matter in.controversy have been settled out of Court. t is therefore ordered, o t ; eV. Tur the Superior Court of: Iredell County, before His Honor, W.J.Adams, Judge I » On motion of Zeb.V.Turlington, Attorney rt laintiff that thts action be and th : h , i Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to for plat ’ e@ same is hereby non-suited and ' that the costs be taxed against the plaintiff. them as follows; W.J.Adams lst. In what amount, it any, are the defendants indebted to the Judge Presiding. plaintiff by breach of contract as alleged in the complaint ? ANSWER: $265.00 with interest from August lst, 1916. North Carolina In the Superior Court Qnd. Was the failure of the Carolina M,tor Company to deliver rf . . é Iredell County.|] October Term, 1909, the car to the’ plaintiff caused by the refusal of the defendant, OL. - | No.56 Barringer to deliver said car to the Carolina Motor Company in accordance Sr ' P.H.Lazenb with his Contract? nby 1 ANSWER: Yes ovee 9 | GMENT. C.C.Harpe, et al. t is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the os | plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $265.00 and interest from the This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior lst day of August, 1916, until paid, and the costs of this action to be Court, and it being heard before His Honor,W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding, taxed by the Clerk of this Court. and it appearing to the Court that plaintiff and defendant have settled It. is further considered and adjudged by the Court that the _their ditference; and that the plaintiff has agreed to take a non-suit: defendant, 0.L.Barringer, is primarily lftable for the amount adjudged to be It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be and due to the plaintiff, and in the event that said Carolina Motor Company shal the same is hereby non-suited and dismissed. be caused to pay said judgment or any part thereot, then said Carolina Motor W.J. Adams vudge Presiding. Company shall recover the amount due offi this judgemnt from the said 0.L.° Barringer. | North Carolina In the Superior Court W. J. Adams | nay . ’ Judge Presiding. Ps bd zrede2) County. } ' Qctober Term, 1919. ‘ ‘ . ee 0.26 CTE. Wills, H.O.Steele} North Carolina, Superior Court, and Eugene Morrison.) | Iredell County. } Oct. Term, 1919, | -VS- mo JUDGMENT. | No.d2 TT. ° “a Fred A. Thomas. t | ©.S.Holland and S.P.Holland| This cause coming on to be heard at the October Term, 1919, of #* svg bi { JUDGEMENT OF NON-SUIT, | _ | the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court thet H ‘ igi 3 x Joseph amoy 1 the plaintiffshhave asked to take a non-suit ih said action. This cause coming~on to be heard the plaintiff takes a voluntar Non-Suit cocts be taxed against 8.P. Holland by en ma ee # W.J.Agams at this term of the superior ¢ Pgs : It is, therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the. Plaintit® be and they are hereby bon-sulted and the plaintiff hal 1 p ay ig ts | North Carolina,|} Superior Court, Iredell County. Oct.Term, 1919. A No.15 0.7T.Deal { No.15 -vs- t JUDGMENT. Dr.E.E.Little and Dr.L.V.Cloaninger] This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor, W.d.Adams, Judge, and it appearing to the Court that plaintiff does not desire to prosecute his action and submits to a non-suit. It is therefore adjudged by the Court that plaintiff be and hereby is non-suited. W.2.Adams Judge Presiding. —— orth Carolina,} Superior Court, Iredell County.} Oct. Term, 1919. No.27-1/2 Mrs.D.S.Williams Admx. of § John W.Williams { No.27-1/2 -vs- 0 FUDGMENT. Southern Railway Co. { This cause coming on to be heard at this term before His Honor, W.d.Adams, Judge, and the plaintiff coming into Court, by nfA counsel and announce she does not care to prosecute her action. It is, considered and adjudged by the Court, that plaintiff be and she is hereby non-suited. W.d.Adams dudge Presiding. North Carolina,} Superior Court, Iredell County.) Oct. Term, 1919. No.35 { 4 IUDGMENT. Of non-suit. L.G. Johnson 0.0.0vercash 4 This cause coming on to be heard and when called the plaintiff announced that he did not care to prosecute the action, further at this oul voluntariy submits to a non-suit. It is therefore considered that plaintiff be permitted and is hereby non-suited, defendant to recover his cost. W.J,Adams Ta residing. ‘i -VS- 30.20 North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.l. October Term, 1919. No.20 Liberty Hosiery Manufacturing Co.} dUDGRAR F. Chinnabee Valley Mills Tis cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court mats | before His Honor W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court | that the intervener, the Isbell National Bank of Talladegar Alabama is the ‘owner and entitled to the funds attached by the plaintiff in this case, and it further appearing that said funds have been attached since the 4th | das of June 1918 and held under said attachment against the said Isbell |National Bank aforesaid: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the attach- | ments 4{ssued in this case be, and all of them are hereby, dissolvedriand the Clerk of the Court is hereby ordered and directed to turn over séid | funds to H.P.Grier attorney of record for the said intervener -Isbell | National Bank aforesaid. It is further considered and adjudged that the intervener, Isbell National Bank, recover of the plaintiff, Liberty Hosiery Manufac- _ turing Co., the sum of Sixty and 33/100 dollars (same being six per cent | interest’ on $724.17 the sum attached by plaintiff from June 4th 1918 to date hereof) with interest thereon from date of this judgment until paid, | and that said Isbell National Bank recover of the plaintiff its costs of action in this behalf expended. W.J.Adams Judge presiding. | North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.] Octoher Term, 1919. No.21 |J.L.Lewis, Carby Honeycutt, } and Lester Blackwelder. { SUDGMENT. ¥o.2) -V8< } Statesville Lumber Company.|] This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffiand the defendant have adjusted their differences: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiffs magover of{thdadefandantsthe ayn of $9,33 and interest from Nov. 26th., 1916, unt4l paid and for the costs fo this action. No.27 No.l | recover of the plaintiff the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. North Carolina,|} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | October Term, 1919. - No.27 John Caldwell Admr., &c., } -vs- { JUDGMENT. B.A. Troutman and L.L. Troutman, Partners trading under the firm | name and style of Mooresville { Furniture Co. j This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and being heard before His Honor, W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding and a jury, and his Honor having submitted the issues set out in the record to the jury and the jury having answered said issues as is set out in the record, to-wit, as follows: " 1. Was the death of plaintiff's intestate caused by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint ? Answer. No." | It is therefore upon motion of A.L.Starr and H.P.Grier attorneys for the defendant considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his writ. " W.d.Adams Judge Presiding. North Carolina,] Superior Court, Iredell County.]} October Term, 1919. No. l Dr.eJ.J.Mott 4 «vs- ' JUDGMENT. R.L,Flanigan q This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding and the plaintiff having taken a voluntary non-suit,. , It is, therefore , considered and adjudged that the defendant W.J.Adams gudge Presiding. No.10 ee North Carolina,} Superior Court, Iredell County.} October Term, 1919. No210_ | First National Bank t of Statesvill, N.C. } -Vs- } JUDGMENT. T.Foy White. ' This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before, His Honor, W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding, and it appearing that the plaintiff has taken a voluntary non-suit. It is, therefore, considered and idiubaad net the defendant recover of the plaintiff the costs of action to be taxed by the Clerk. W.J.Adams eudge Presiding. No.34 No.d4 Carolina Motor Company | ~vs- JUDGMENT. John R,.Hagaman North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) Before the Clerk. This cause coming on to be heard at the October term, 1919, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, W.J.Adams, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff and defendant have settled end compromised all matters and things in controversy between them arising out of the maters and things alleged in the complaint and answer, upon the following terms, to-wit: The def'endant to recover nothing on his counter claim, but is to pay the plaintiff the sum of $400.00 and the plaintiff to pay the costs of this action. It is Therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $400.00. It is further considered and adjudged that the defendant recover nothing in his counter-claim, but | that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. It is further considered and adjudged that the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession to the Denmo Truck described in the pleading, and if said judgment for the $400.00 aforesaid is not paid within 10 days from the expiration of this Court, then said plaintiff shall be entitled to take possession of said Truck, and all rights and equities of he the defendant in said truck shall be forever foreclosed, and F.H.Deaton 18 hereby appointed a Commissioner of this Court to sell said Truck at public auction at the Court House Door of Caldwell County, after advertising the same for 20 days in gome newspaper published in Caldwell County, and apply the proceeds of said sale for the payment of this judgment end interest and costs of sale, any surplus to be paid to the defendant. It is further considered and adjudged by the Court that the value of said Denmo Truck at the time same was replevied was $500.00, and in the event said Truck is not delivered up to the plaintiff in this case as provid : by this Judgment upon the demand of the Commissioner herein appointed, th and in that event judgment is hereby rendered against the surety in said replevy bond, E.L,Steele, for the gum of $500.00 in favor of the plaintiff bring a sufficient amount to pay off and dicharge this judgment and the costs of the sale, judgment is hereby rendered against said surety E.L. Steele for the balance remaining due on this judgment after the application of the net proceeds of said sale through the payment of the Same» W.J.Adama Judge Presiding. By consent of; Dorman Thompson W.A.Bristol Att*’y. for Plaintiff. H.P. Grier Att*y for Defendant, Monday, January 26th., 1920, North Carolina, Iredell County. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County of Iredell on the 5th Monday before the Ist in Match, the same being the 26th day of January, 1920, when and where His Honor Judge Thos, J.Shaw, 1s present and presiding, and Honorable, Hayden Clement, Solicitor is present and presecuting in the name the State, M.P.Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the namsés of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurora for the first week of this term, to-wit; W.H.Hunter, O.d.Sherrill, °.B,Houston, W.A.McKnight, L, ~Scott, W.C.Blaylock, J.H.Cloaninger, sr,,R.C. Little, H.L.Gilbert, J.R. Abernathy, L.A. Anderson, J.F.Aldman, C.T.Walley, A.A. Kyles, G.F.Neill, W.W.Brown, M.Sample, Jno,.V.Barger, E.W.Crawford, C.A.Stewart, LF Deal, J.FP.Eagle, G.L.Houston, A.L. Jacks, H.L.Stevenson, D.K. McNeely, R.B. Parker, J.W. Sprinkle, R.M.Abernathy, E.F.Cass, A.F. Harris, The following famed: jurors were returned by the Sheriff " could not be found"; C.0.Cashion, A,P.Davidson, R.R.Goodnight, A,J.Beaver, and T.R.Renegar was returned as being sick, The following named jurors were excused by the Court: J.B, Kaxgia Houston and G.F,Neill. The following good and lawful men were drawn and sworn as Grand Jurors for the term, as follows: M.Sample, R.B, Parker, L.R.Deal, R.C. Little, v.H,Cloaninger,Sr., D.K.McNeely, W.H.Hunter, H.L.Stevenson, A.L. Jacks, E.W.Crawford, J.W, Sprinkle, L.F.Scott, W.W.Brown, G.L,Houston, L.A.Anderson, C.T.Walley, R.M. Abernathy, E.F. Case, D.K.McNeely was sworn as foreman of the Grand Jury. C.M.Swisher was sworn as officer of the Grand Jury. The following good and lawful men were Sworn as Petty jury for the term; 0.J.Sherrill, J.R.Abernathy, Jno.V.Barger, A.F.Harris, A.A. Kyles, C.a.Stewart, J.F,Eaglem W.C.Blaylock, H.L.Gilbert, The following good and lawful men were aworn as Telismen jury for the week: W.A.Nicholson, A.B. Parker, Scott Murdock, L.R.Smith, S.D, Dingler, A,A.Nei11, } | No. 1 States vs Rush Nicholson > NOx. 2 State vs Raleigh John Ab Raleigh No.5 State vs No. 6 State VS dim Talford. State vs Carter Reddick No. 9 State vs “ames Yarlton nT NO. 1 State vs if Harvey Lee Houston No. 12 State vs Son Privett No. 13 State vs Tom Pickens No. 14 State vs Tom Pickens No. 15 State vs David Yaither Monday, January 26th., 1920, A.W.D.W. Alias Cagias to McDowell County. B.WeDiW. Axiax Gaptax.Continued, Murder. Alias Capias.. Larceny. Alias Capias, Alias Capias, Larceny. 1} Pros With Leave Abandonment, Nol Pros With feave, A.W.D.W. Nol Pros With “eave, Alias Capias, Affray. Nol Pros With Leave, Liz R. Alias Capias, hoe Re Continued, A.W.D.W. Alias Capias, Ha. 2é State vs | Robert Woodward NO, 37 State vs Will Bell No. 19 State 18: John Teague No. 20 | State vs fen Bryant Farris Bryant No.21 State vs Kelly Souther Carl Souther | No, 22 State CVs i Kelly Souther Carl Souther No.23 State vs Frank Lineberger No. 24 State vs F.H.Upright | D.C. Pethel (No. 25 State | vs | Burley Myers |Flake Holland | i iNo. 26 i State | vs (E.J.Cain j i | } i No. 27 State vs W.Y.Westmorelana No, 32 State vs ANGs' Ghegeny Monday, January 26th., 1920, Too much Liquor. Alias Capias, Mfg. Liquor. Alias Captas, Larceny, Alias Capias, Alias Capias to Yadkin County, C.C.W. Alias Capias to Guilford County. Affray. Continued, Elopement. Alias Vapias, Liquor for sale. Alias Capias to Cabarrus County. Having Liquor Contrary to Law, Continued under former order, } Having Liquor Contrary to Law, } Continued under former order, A.W.D.W. Alias Capias, { Ab, # ba ; 46 * No. 39 State vs Will Perkins No. 34 State ’ vs L.H.Souther No. 37 State vs Bill Barnhnardt Bill Barnhrdt No. 39 State vs Michey No. 40 State vs Albert Simons No. 42 State vs Chas, Goble State vs Chas Goble No. 43 State vs Parnegy Stewart No. 44 State vs Tom Honeycutt No, 45 State vs Adam Cranford No. 46 State vs Adam Cranford No, 48 State vs Cass Lambert Monday, January 26th., 1920, A.W.D.W. Continued under former order. Having Liquor Contrary to Law, Alias Capias. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Alias Capias. Ci Gut. Continued, Pick Pocket. Alias Yapias. Petty Larceny. Continued. Called and failed judgment SNsx*ante Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. Instanta S¢i Fa and Capias to issue. Selling Liquor. Called and failed. Judgment Nisi sel Fa and Capias. Instanta Sci Fa and Capias to issye. Galied and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Pa Mfg. Liquor. and Capias. 15 day in which to renew “elling Liquor. Alias Capias. Selling Liquor. Alias Capias. ponds Ketailing. Alias Capias to Forsyth County, Selling Liquor, Continued by: ¢ondentyociont Fa and “apias. No. 49 State vs Boise Conner No. 28 State vs Bud Millsaps No. 29 State vs . Grover L.Smith HO, Oo. State vs Neil Hellard. No. 50 State vs Ed Alexander, } j : j t ' Net at EN A EN EE EO EN A A et A RE EE NR SE A MS ESE EE Monday, January 26th., 1920. Resisting an Officer. Alias Capias, 2 Abandonment. (Off) Nol Pros With Leave. Affray. Continued under former order. C.C.W. Defendant pleads guilty. Murder. He it remembered that at this term of the:Superior Court of Iredell County beginning January 26th., 1920, and sitting for the dispatch of business, this the 26th day of January, 1920 the Grand jury of said Court in a body, 18 present, returned into :| open Court the following bill of indictment in words and figures as follows; Indictment -- Murder. State of North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, .$rpéd@11 County. ) Jan. term, A.D. 1920. The Jurors for the State upon their oath present, That Ed Alexander late of the County of Iredell on the 23 day of Vecember A.D, 1919, with force and arms, at and in the County aforesaid, feloniously, willfully, and of his malice afore- thought, did kill and murder I.C.Rayle contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. Clement, Solicitor A TRUE BILL. D.K.McNeely Foreman orand Jury. By order of the Court, the defendant, Ed Alexander in the custody of the High Sheriff, was brought : into open Court being represented by counsel, W.D. Turner, R.B.McLaughlin and others, was placed upon his arraignment. The Solicitor, Hon.Hayden Clement, for the State having called upon the prisoner to stand and hold:up his right hand, and having made known to him that he stood charged by the name of Ed Alexander in the indictment read to him, the prisoner plead not guilty and for his trial placed himself upon God and his Country. The defendantsthrough his counsel moves for case to be continued to May term of Court, 1920, ‘wherefore the Court continues case over to ‘ fuesdsy Jan, 2%th., 1920 for further pleadings and orders, aes No. 53 State vs E.L.Summers. No. 68 State vs Garfielf Gray Epsie ltamsey Vernie Winford. zm 2 et © Ha pe om @ C4 |. wm es 3 oO s c? ° No. 47 State vs J.R.Childers No. 55 State vs Tal Sherrill No. 54 State vs T.T.Smith No. 51 State vs W.L.Poston No. 56 State vs Tom Henderson George Brown No. 70 State vs Joe Cook No. 67 State vs A.Heldward Graham EE CT SE We se oe ee at et | 7 This Honorable FA7th., 1920, at 9330 o'clock, A.M. Monday, January 26th., 1920. A.W.D.W. Defendant pleads guilty. pay a fine of $25.00 and cost of this acti It is adjudged by the Court that this setip Nn. Larceny and Receiving. Defendant pleads guilty. Garfield Gray and Vernie Winford pleads not guilty, The following jurors; 0.J.Sherrill, J.R.Abernathy, Jno.V.Barger, A.F.Harris, A.A.Kyles, C.A.Stewart, I.F.Eagle, W.C.Blaylock, H.L.Gilbert, W.A.Nicholson, A.B. Parker, Scott Murdock, being sworn and empannesay for their verdict say that they find the defendants Garfield Gray and Vernie Winford guilty. It is adjudged by the Court that the defendant Epsie Ramsey pay a fine of $15.00 and 1/3 cost; and defendants Garfield Gray and Vernie Winforcd each pagvaofine of $25.00 and 1/3 cost each. Disposing of Mtg. property. Not a true bill. Forgery. Defendants pleads guilty to forceable trespass. Judgment suspended upon payment of cost and the payment of the check of $7.50. Ae Tf WV fue thea sto he Deffendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. Instanta Sci Fa and Capias to issue. Defendant called and failed. Instanta Sci Fa Too much Liquor. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and capias. and Capias to issue. ‘ Murder. Defendant dead. (Off) Defendant committed suicide in the County Jail some time in the night of Thursday Jan. 22nd, 1920. Felony. . Not a true bill. Retailing. Capias. A.W.D.W. Defendant pleads not guilty. The following jurors; 0.J.Sherrill, J.R.abernathys Jno.V.Barger, A.F.Harris, A.A.Kyles, C.A,Stewart, J.F.Eagle, W.C.Blaylock, H.L.Gilbert, W.A.Nicholsom A.B.Parker, Scott Murdock, being sworn and empannel for their verdict say they find the defendant guilt Court takes a recess until, Tuesday Morning Janué ¢ No * Ee Tuesday, January 27th., 1920. This Honorable Court convened at 9:30 otclock, A.M. Tuesday Morning, January 27th., 1920, for the dispatch of business, No. 56 State vs A.H. Baker No. 50 State vs Ed Alexander. | No. 35 State vs M.A.Beam No. 54 State vs T.T. Smith No, 56 | State ‘es. VS Tom Henderson eorge Brown Mod ad pect neces SP eee paces Ee et ANE Pa EE NE pet DC ee ee ec et ee SH ek NE ee Ae a ER SE ee << aN aot ect aot OIA sete me ae Having Liquor Contrary to “aw, Defendant pleads guilty. Upon recommendation of the Solicitor judgment is continued for 2 years on condition that defendant appear at each January term and show good behavior. It is further ordered by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and cost of this action together with a forfeiture bond of $300.00. AURDER. By order of the Court, the defendant Ed Alexander in the custody of the High Sheriff was brought into open Court, being represented by counsel, W.D. Turner, and R.B.McLaughlin. Defendant througt his counsel made motion that case be continued to May term, 1920. Motion over-ruled and trial set for Monday February end., 1920. But the Court finds from the affidavits that at the present time the prisoner can not secure a fair trial from jurors residing in Iredell County on account of the feeling existing in the County against said prisoner’ Upon motion of prisoner's counsel the Court orders that a special venire of 56 good and lawful men to be summoned from Rowan County, North Carolina. The same being an adjoining County of Iredell to serve as jurors in said case, which said order is as follows: North Cerolina, Iredell County. State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of Rowan County: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to forth-with summons thirty-six good and lawful men of Rowan County to appear at the Court house in Statesville, N.C. on Monday the second day of Pebruary, 1920 at 10:50 o'clock, A.M. to serve as jurors in the case of State vs. Ed Alexander, charged with MURDER. Herein feil not at your peril. This January 27th., 1920. Thos.d.ohaw Judge presiding, loth Jud. Dist. You will furnish copies of your venire to the “* Solicitor and defendant s counsel, Thos.J,Snaw Judge Presiding. Defengant pleads not guilty. The following jurors; N.G.Holmes, Neill Summers, W.c.Perry, W.C.Blaylock, Scott Murdock, §.D.Dingler, I.F,Eagle, W.A.Nicholson, W.M.Mills, C.A.Stewart, L.R.Smith, A.A.Neill, being sworn and empanneled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of selling Liquor. Selling Liquor. & ™ Keeping Liquor for sale. Forfeiture strichen out and cont#iyed on account of absence of defendnats witness. Bond fixed at $200. Defendant George Brown called and failed, Felony ; Instanta § Pa Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Caples, to issue. . i Continued over to Wednesday as to Tom Her Tuesdey, January 27th., 1920. Wednesday morning, January 28th., No. 66 State Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Appearance bond 4s Honorable Court convened at 9:3 t k r . vs ; for appeal to Supreme Court continued to May Term, = ted at 9:50 o'clock, A.M, Wednesday Burton Charles 1920. Bond renewed. ; Morning, January 28th., 1920, for the dispatch of business, No. 3 | No. 64 State i It is ordered by the Court that defendant | State Larceny Defendant called and failed y : : : 4 aye + CA he ake a ra A a A v agr vs pay a fine of $50.00 and cost of this actio vs : Nisi Sci Fa and Gapiew, Pnatentar@se Pe Neil Hellard and upon condition that defendant give bond ry Davis to issue Tns c Rp “ in sum of $500.00 for his appearance at ania ; ich sa ed ep. each January term for three years and show good behavior. No. 67 A.W.D.W. Defendant pleads not guilty. The following jurors; N.G.Holmes, Neill Summers, W.C.Perry, W.C.Blaylock, Scott Murdock, S.D.Dingien J.F.Eagle, W.A.Nicholson, W.M.Mills, C.A.Stewart, m.R,omith, A.A. Ne being sworn and empanneled for their verdi say they find the defendant guilty of A.W.D.W It is ordered by the Coubt that cefendant pay a fine of $25.00 and cost of this action. State 5 ie vs No. 65 : | A.H.Graham State vs Forgery. Defendnat pleads guilty. liary Hayes Nos. 72 and 73 State Forgery. Defendant through her Counsel waives bill} vs and pleads guilty to forceable trespass, liary flayes A.W DW. Defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty simp] ssault on Marie Lynchy a woman, Motion for judgment continued until next term of yw and receiving. Defenant pleads guilty. Court upon payment of cost in this action and giving bond in sum of $100. ' apr at next term of Court. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Nol Pros With Leave. Honorable Court takes recess until Wednesday morning, . 5 9.2% ta 1 A 7 3 s i A ne; s 920, at 9:50 o clock, A.M. 3 L.& R. Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered by *- 2 vw the Court that defendant be confined to the County I 3 Jail with leave of County Commissioner to work af} YY tho J— the County Home of aged and infirm, for a term of 5 4 months. Not to wear felon stripes. vudge Presigvng. en No. 52 State t Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi vs Sci Fa and Capias. Instanta Sci Fa and Bob Angle Capias to issue. Instanta Sci Fa and Kapts Yapias issued. No. 65 State Forgery. ‘Defendant pieads guilty of Forceable ve Trespass. Motion for judgment continued to next Mery Hayes Court upon payment the:edst in this action and giving bond in the sum of $50. No. 18 State Seduction. Defendant pleads guilty. Upon recommendation of Solicitor and asséctate counsel, J.W. Campbell it is ordered that defendant pay the cost of this action and pay into the Clerk's office $600.00 for Beulah Gaither. No. 5 State - order of good behavior, Nol Pros with Ed Hegler Leave. “ No. 4 State vs Scarlia “avis Jim McCarter + 7 nT No. 4 Sei Fa Docket. No. 37 a > State VS Bill Barnhart ss ; Bien ir cag ke: No. 5 Sci Fa Docket Na 2Q twee (ws c+ +A ww LG vs we eee Micke Jor O hs i ie mae n No. © ci A VWOCKELU a ce No. 49 a State VS Adar Cranf ra Fs _ No. 76 a + State vs or ae c y Katie Lee Summers f\ To + + re Alias Katie Lee Feimst a No. 69 State vs Jask Horton NO. 10 State vs Watt Kerr No. 27 State vs W.Y.Westmoreland No. 45 State vs Parney Stewart No. 62 State vs Pal Goodson et ot ne a OE St A OE et Ft oe ee ot at ee oe Se et et oe oS et O i Co [1 — Ve Cx Wednesday, January 28th., 1920. Retailing. Order of good behavior. Off. et) Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias,. Alias Instanta Sci Fa and Capias to issue. Instanta Ali&gs Sei Fa and Capias issued. Too much Liquor. Judgment Absolute for $200.00 It is ordered by the Court that transcript of judgment be sent to Cabarrus County. = a. - returned defendant not to be G/OC. 4Vu Selling Liguor. Alias Instanti Sci Fa. Issued and returned defendant not to be found. It is ordered tkak by the Court that judgment Absolute be entered against deft. for $500.00. 7 Larceny and'Receiving. Defendant pleads not guilty. The following jurors; N.G.Holmes, Neill Summers, W.C.Perry, W.C.Blaylock, Scott Murdock, S.D.Dingler ‘JI.F. Eagle, W.A.Nicholson, W.M.Mills, C.A.Stewart, L.R.Smith, A.A.Neill, being sworn and empanneled for*thetr’ verdict say they find defendant guilty of Larceny and Receiving. t 4s ordered by the Court defendant be confined in oO ie o County dail for a term of 3 months. Retailing. Not a true bill. The said Jack Horton is required to bond in the sum of $200.00 for his appearance at “ay term 1920, as witness in case State vs Joe Cook for retaining} Defendant Valled and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. Abandonment. A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. Mfg. Liquor. Forfektture strcken out. Retailing. ‘Nol Pros With Leave. No. 65 State vs Dock Anderson No. 64 State vs \ fienry yas No. 70 State vs Joe Cook No. 74 State vs N.A.Reneger No. 75 State vs Jake Morrison Will Poe No. 77 State vs Chas. Little No.78 State vs John Goodnight No. 35 State vs M.A.Beam No. 56, State > Vs Tom Henderson No. 52 State vs Bob Angle <— oe a ee — at A eo et et EE et aot ace CS St rot Fe ne et pet et et et eet ee OE ee ce Wednesday, January 28th., 1920. o- Retailing. Nol Pros With “eave, Larceny. Defendant called and failed. Judgment Instanta Nisi Sci Fa and Yapias. Instanta Sci Fa end Y“apias issued and returned eft, not to be found. Retailing. Capias. Mfg. Liquor. Capias,. ‘ qv .nday > a * sa ee a Retailing. Vapias,. ‘ C.C.¥. Capias to Lincoln County. Liquor for sale. VYapias? Selling Liquor. It is ordered by the Court that defendant be confined in the County gail for a term of 12 months with leave of County Commissioners to work at County home of Aged and Infirm. Not to wear felon stripes. AGREEMENT, State vs. M.A.Beam. By consent defendant alJowed 15 days efter adjournment of Court to serve case on appeal and the Solicitor 30 days thereafter to serve exception of Counter-case. Service by officér waived. be made by mailing case to the Solicitor at his amr address in Salisbury and countersease to be sePyed by mailing same to Mr. Dorman Thompson at his address in Statesville. Felony. It is ordered by the Court that the Deft. Tom Henderson be sent to the Jacuson Temining School if they can take him and that he bond in sum of $200, to next term of Court. Larceny and Receiving. It is ordered by the Court that the forfeiture be tricken out against the Deft, Bob Angle. Service to Wt rl + % q 4 ie Wednesday, January 28th., 1920. . 4 Monday Morning, February 2nd., 1920 North Varolina, This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10:30 Iredell County o'clock, A.M., February 2nd., 1920. o. 50 Honorable T.2.Shaw, Judge Presiding: / N | State MURDER. Plea not guilty. We the Grand Jury for January Term 1920 have visited the County Home by Committee and find condition of buildings and grounds to be in 77 In obedience to the order heretofore made in : and inmates were well pleased with their treatment. There Ed Alexander this case a Special Venire of Thirty-six good and tant lawful men were sumr d fror ? inmates, 18 white women, 10 white men; 8 colored men, 7 colored monet, fron Oe re women. We found 7 inmates in the Infirmatory. All bedding and furniture Gererinn by the Sherif? of said Comm, oy, apneer #* ; a at t w | S S N.Oi:0 i and sanitary. We found farm in good state of cultivation being he Court House in Statesville, N.Gy:mensay Morning, February 2nd., 1920 at 10:30 o'clock, A.M. The follow- 3 improved by sowing clover anc by manuré, A‘herd of cattle furnish milk ae . are the names of the Thirty-six good and wt sufficient hogs are kept to supply the large portion of ve ’ ° gine Special Venire as turned into Court: Geo.W.Ratledge, me prison staskute 40 aes oo G.S.Williams, J.N.Haden, W.d.McDaniels, J.W. Payne, The condlteene ere were eee F.L.Palmer, W.C.Odell, J.H.Kerr, H.S.Livengood, L.A. the “ail by Committee and found prisoners - det in i dames Sener or the jeii ae bent, éieen end: sanbieees Brown, G.F.Morefield, H.L.Foard, Wi. T.Barber, R.B. Wie visited the different offices in the Court House and found Paeler, W.A.Baker, B.F.Cauble, W.A.Greham, W.R.Woodson, ee ae ed ae a anne C.M.Rogers, R.G.Knox, L.J.Kluttz, P.H.Herony, Paul M. q T : ae f ine hn ce Register's 6£fice be Nussmen, J.P.Linn, T.H.Knox, C.J.Johnson, W.C.Maupin, repaired. E.G.Mills, W.L.Harris, G.G.Ritchie, oe oes Y Peeler. The following Special Veniremen were excused; We further recommend at A > hiay Sarnett an Insane gil be removed from Co1 te : . : C.M.Rogers and W.L.Harris. removed from County Home to a wh é can be properly cared for. 6 <n MeNeel The prisoner being at the bar in the custody Ye.KA.MCNCCLY Foremen of Grand Jury. of M.P.Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, ana by inquiry of the Court, the State and Deft.geay they tre ready: for tria’., Phe following jurors werd, ¢ awn from the Special Venire of Thirty-six good and lawful tie bs men and sworn and empannelled for their verdict: It is ordered by the Court that the Grand Jury may go home and c Bs See ante, nay W.C.Maupin, S.F.Harris, R.G.Knox G.A.Brown, L.d.Klutts go to their work or business but are not discharged. It is further ordered Ha 5 . . : . 7 7 byethe Court that the Grand Jury shall return under the present organizati¢ E.G.Mills, W.T.Barber, W.A.Baker,J.W. Payne, Geo.W. when ordered by the Court and summoned by the Sheriff. Ratledge, Paul M.Nassman, W.C.Odell. es a. } De . oW. and t in charge of the jury. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday morning, February Huty Sherif®, J.¥.Sebb ese ssorn. set PES ee jury 2nd., 1920, at 10:30 o' eo if eee ee co This Honorable takes a recess until Tuesday Morning, February Srd,. at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. bsie-scl > Pa, | Judge Presiding’ = Tuesday Morning, February Srd., 1920, This Honorable Court convenes at 9:30 O'clock, A.M, Tuesday Morning, February 3rd., 1920 for the dispatch of business, No. 80 ) MURDER. The prisoner being at the bar in charge of the ies li.P. Alexander, The High Sheriff of Iredell County, N.c, State | MAERSK Trial continued over from Monday Feb. 2nd., 1920, vs Upon the taking of all the evidence at 4:45 o'clock, P.M, Ed Alexander Hon. Hayden Burke associate counsel of the Solicitor, ua Further argumén Wednesday, Feb. 4th., 1920, § Larceny and receiving. vs ) It is ordered by the Court that the sentence of' Katie Katie Lee Summers} Lee Summers, Alias Katie Lee Feimster be changed from Alias Katie Lee § S&S months in Jail to a fine of $20.00 and cost of this Feimster. } action, It is ordered by the Court that the Monday and Tuesday's Civil Calendar be continued to Thursday and the remainder of the calendar be continued to next term except Non-jury, Divorce cases, and motions may be heard at time at the discretion of the Court, No, 51 Mrs.Tina B.Morrow, The death of defendant Suggested, Admx. of W.0. It is ordered by the Court that Plaintiff be 4 Morrow, allowed to amend complaint.t n~of_ AD | vs W.L.Poston No. 62 Walter Morrow, by his The death of defendant suggested, next friend Mrs, Tina It is ordered by the Court that plaintiff be t B. Morrow, allowed to amend complaint, Laake eran f4 vs ; W.L. Poston This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning ,a& February 4th., 1920, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M. Mos Qhew epding, Wednesday Morning, February 4th., 1920, This Honorable Court convenes at 9:00 o'clock, A.M. Wednesday Morning, February 4bh., 1920, It is ordered by the Court that the Civil Calendar be continued to next term of Court. \ MURDER. Trial continued over from Tuesday, The prisoner being at the bar in custody of MiP. Ed Alexander Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell) County, whose prisoner he is, argument was resumed, The Court's charge to the Jury was finished at 6:10,P.M and the Jury retired to their room for their verdict. The Jury after 45:minutes deliberation returned into open Court and say they find the defendant, Ed zAkexank Alexander is guilty of the felony and murder in the Aw rons ¢ para’ os first degree, waeneet—tre~stemde charged in the bill of indictment, The Solicitor, Hon, Hayden Clement, on behalf iof the State prays the judgmentio£ the Court upon the verdict of the Jury duly returned, The prisoner was then remanded to prison to await the orders of the Court, ae This Honorable Court takes recess until Thursday Morning, Pebruary 5th., 1920, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M. ne OAS Judge ee . — ; i Hf | f | ; ‘ i] i | : ia i | } j | j |; shall have/30 days in which to file pleadings and that the defendants shall j | } } | | | } i } | installments of $20.00 per month until the $400.00 is paid out. Said {installments to begin or first installment to be paid the lst day of March, | 1920. | No, 2 J.E. Patjen and D.W.Adams } State ) MURDER. The prisoner being at the Bar ir custody of M.P. Thursday Morning, February 5th., 1920. This Honorable Court convenes at 9:00 o'clock, A.M., Thursday | Morning, February 5th., 1920, for the dispatch of business. In the case No. 18 State vs J.W.Campbell for seduction it was ordered by the Court that defendant J.W.Campbell pay into the Clerk's offical $600.00 . for Beulah Gaither, It is further ordered by the Court that the Clerk pay | to the said Beulah Gaither $200.00 at once and the remaining $400.00 in Statesville Lumber Co. ) It is ordered by the Court that defendant have vs ) time to file amended answer. It is ordered by the Court that in all Civil Actions the plaintiffs have 30 so thereafter to file answers. \ No. 50 vs } Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, whose Ed Alexander. § prisoner he is. Motiom for new trial for errors of tne motion denied. ; Courts 4 Ver endant excepts judgment of the ica Def endar excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court. Notice of appes waived. By consent the prisoner is allowed 50 days from t 7th day of February 1920 to make and serves case on appeal and 30 days thereafter for the State to serve countercasé or exception. Appeal bond for costs fixed at $50.00. -_ State of North Carolina,]} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. { January Term, 1920. State ' vs 1 Ed Alexander ) This case coming on to be tried at this term of the Cour indictment charging the prisoner with murder in the first degr : bis ia f : y tried, and the jury after having been duly empanneled ha their verdict that the prisoner, Ed Alexander , is guilty Thursday Morning, February 5th., 1920. and murder in the first degree in manner and form as charged in the bill of indictment, and the said prisoner being at the Bar of the Court in his own proper person, and having stated to the Court that. he has no reason to give why the sentence of death should not be pronounced against him: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Ed Alexander be remanded by the Sheriff of Iredell County to the common jail of said County and there safely kept as required by law, and by seid Sheriff to be conveyed as provided by law and delivered to the Warden of the State's prison of North Carolina at Raleigh, North Carolina, and by him to*beysafely kept in said State's Prison as required and provided by law until the 16th duy of April 1920, upon which day vettreen the hours of 6 A.M. and 12 A.M. the said Ed Alexander is to be conveyed to the permanent death chamber in said State's Prison, and the Warden of said State's Prison of North Carolina, or in case of his death, inability or absence, the deputy Warden of said State's Prison of North Carolina shall cause the said Ed Alexander to be electrocuted as required end provided by law by causing to pass through the body of the said Ed Alexander a current of electricity of sufficient voltage and intensity to cause his death, and the application of said current shall be continued until the said Ed Alexander shall be dead, dead, dead, And may the Lord have mercy upon his soul. Thos, J.Shaw Judge Presiding. January Term, 1920. North Varcltna,} In the Superior Court, Iresell County.} January Term, 1920, Walter M.Houpe vs | w.W.Holland Admr. of | W.W.Houpe, deceased. This cause coming on to be heard at the January Term, 1920, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, T.J.Shaw, Judge : : a t t Ly ai | Presiding, and the plaintiff having come into Court and announced his on to take a Non-suit: It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged by the Court that the cause of action of the Plaintiff be and the same is hereby Non- suited. It is further adjudged that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Thos.J,chaw Juage Presiding. p -sorsn Carolina», In the Superior Court, January Term, 1920. | Iredell County. |} No.32-1/2 No. 32-1/2 A.A.Sides and others } a vs } C.E.Sides and others }j This cause coming on tc be heard by His Honor, T.J.Shaw, Judge Presiding, at the January Term, 1920, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the opinion of the Supreme Court of North Carolina in the appee from the judgment rendered in this cause at the October Term of the super Court of Iredell County being presented to the Court; It is ordered and adjudged that this cause be remanded to th Clerk of this Court with instructions to further proceed in this cause” v accordance with the'apinion of the Supreme Court. | » Thos. J, Shan No.40 North Yarolina, | North Carolina, January Term, 1920. No. 4i. Superior Court, Iredell County.| Januery Term 1920. urs.Kate Goodin & husband} ( L.K.Goodin i JUDG ME RN f. vs j Jane Crater, Clint Dowell} et al i This cause coming on to bd heard before His Honor, Thos.J.Shaw, upon an agreed statement of facts submitted by the plaintiff and defendant without action. It 4s, therefore, ordered and adjudged that Mrs. Kate Goodin is the owner and entitied to possession of Sewen & 1/2 acres of land off the Eastern half of the Sanford Crater home place in Union Grove Township - and that said Mrs.Kate Goodin is a tenant in common in said lands with Clint Dowell. It is further ordered that the defendants be taxed with the cost of this action. Thos.J,Shaw Judge tresiding. Superior Court, Iredell County. |} “anuary Term, 1920. No. 40 0.I.Jorden, et al { vs } W.A, Campbel2., et al } This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, Thos.d. Shaw, Judge: Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that this is a proceeding brought before the Clerk for the purpose of establishing the line between the lands of the pafies to this pro¢eeding, And it appearing further to the Court that same has been improperly transferred to the Court Issie Docket of this Court: It is Abeene ces ordered and eaijudges by. the Court. spinate eee North Carolina, | In the Superior Court. It is further ordered adjudged and decreed that the said life Iredell County. 4 tnterest be sold at public auction at the Court house door of Iredell Peoples Loan & Savings Bank, . 4 Cpunty, after due advertisement according to law, Incorporated of Statesville, N.C.} f It is further ordered adjudged and decreed that Buren Jurney, -Vs- JUDGMEN T. ne and he is hereby appointed a COMMISSIONER of this Court to sell said Jim Mott property after due advertisement sell said land to the highest bidder for cash on Monday April 5th., 1920, the same being the first Monday in said This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, at this term st | Month, and the said Buren Jurney, Commissioner is hereby authorized and of Court before his Honor Honaorable, Thos.J.Shaw, Judge Presiding, and it instructed by the Court to pay out of the proceeds arising from said sale appearing. to the Court that on the rd. day of October 1919, the plaintiff to first this judgment and the cost of this action and all expenses in this action caused a writ of attachment to issue against the property of -appertaining hereto and the remainder, if any, to the office of the Clerk the defendant, and a levey made on property of defendant and on the | of this Court for the use of the defendant. fifteenth day of November filed a properly verified complaint in the : Thos.d. Shaw Judge Presiding. affice of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to which complaint no answer has ever been filed. It further appearing to the Court that the defendant is a non-resident of the State of North Carolina and was at the time at which the said attachment was issued and levied. WHEREFORE, it is hereby ordered adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum $317.55 with the interest on the same from Jan. 2lst., 1917, at the rate of six per cent per annum, until paid and for the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. It is further ordered and decreed that this judgment be declared Be a specific lien on. the following described property which is the identical property levied on by the Sherill of Iredell County by reason of the before) — = oot nsictin : Judge Prgsiding. — mentioned attachment, which property is described as follows, to-wit: Peginning a stone on the South side of Bell Street in the city of Statesville and on the West side of an alley at a point 12 feet from F,L,Sharpe's corner on the East side of said alley and running thence with Bell Street South 66 degrees West 63 feet to a stone on top of terrace; thence South 23 East with the terrace 150 feet to a stone; thence North 66 East 63 feet to a stone on the West side of aforsaid alley; thence North > 23 West 150 feet to the beginning on Bell Street. See deed from A.F. Henley and wife to J,J.Mott in Book 52 page 335 for fuller description. That the interest of said defendant in the above described lands is a life estate of the said Jim Mott, which life estate he hold ; an estate of courtsey, Ren dodoan pe rciemdinmemsage=a tyres oe Monday, May 17th, 1920. Monday Morning, Mey 17th, 1920. | North Carolina,} No. 3 1) May Term, 1920. State ' Iredell County. vs ? Murder. Nol pros with leave Raleigh Miller t | Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and es No. 4 for the County of Iredell on the llth Monday after the ist Monday March, zB ' \State } es ) H.B, & L. Nol Pros With Leave,” 1920, the same being the 17th day of May, 1920, when and where His Honor Jim Talford ) Judge Thomas J,Shaw, is present and presiding, and Honorable, “ayden ¢ . 5 Clement, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in. the name of the State Mite } Abandonment. The Deft, Watt Kerr having paid into the ee } Clerk's office $360.00 in full of the judgment of the M.P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into Watt Kerr } Court. Therefore it is ordered by the Court that .) this case go off and the Deft. is discharged, open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: No. 7 State } | C.S.King, W.B.Crawford, J.W.Eudy, R.L.Bradford, J.D.Gibson, Z.V,. | vs ] L.& Re. Alias Capias, ‘Tom Pickens f | Alexander, W.A.Watts, A.M.Rankin, A.B.Young, T,.A.Ostwalt, F.F.Steele, T.5, | Williamson, J.T.Smith, M.A.Beaver, W.E.Morrison, I,C.Clendenin, B.A.Baggarly, iNo. 8 ' | State ‘ E,D.Welborne, Earl Johnston, R.E.Gatton, J.P.Collins, J.C.McNeely, C.L.Clark, vs 0 L. & Re Continued. ; Tom Pickens § I.D.Campbell, N.F.Blackwelder, J.I.Guy, A.B.Parker, J.P.Austin, A.W.Bailey, I.C.Overcash, J.M.Templeton, B.M.McNeely, T.W.Kestler, J.F.Lentz, H.A. es ' ; ate ; Barnard, and P.A.Shinn. vs } A.W.D.W. Alias Capias, David Gaither ) The following named jurors were returned hy the Sheriff ,"could | not be found,": E.D.Welborne, J,P.Austin, and J.F,Lentz. No. 10 < i State t The following named jurors were excused by the Court on the , ‘ 8 0 Too much Liquor. Alias Capias to Durham County. F Robert Woodward jf account of sickness etc.: Earl Johnston and B,M.McNeely. Ws The following good and lawful men were drawn and sworn as GRAND % ge i ate JURORS for the term, as follows: pe vs 1 Mfg. Liquor. Alias Capias. ee : ‘Will Bell 0 W.A.Watts, R.L.Bradford, B.A.Baggarly, W.E.Morrison, M.A.Beavers|) — ls ss in 4 | NO. Z.V.Alexander, T.A.Ostwalt, J.P.Collins, J.D.Gibson, A.M.Rankin, A.W. Bailey) — Pe State t = ¥s } Barceny. Alias Capias. T,.S.Williamson, J.C.McMeely, J.D.Campbell, J.C.Clendenin, C.L.Clark, R.&. John Teague 4 * Gatton, and W.B.Crawford. No.13 State ) R.L.Bridford was sworn as foreman of the GRAND JURY. “ha B ‘ 1 LL. & Re Alias Capias, to Kadki:. and Surry Countges. n Bryan i C.M.Swisher was sworn as officer of the Grand Jury. Parris Bryant i The following good and lawful men were sworn as Petty jury for “o ms the term: C.S.King, A.B.Young, F.F.Steele, J.T.Smith, J.I.Guy, A.B. Park State )4 : ded } Elopement. Alias Capias. | J.C.Overcash, J.M.Templeton, T.W.Kestler, H.A.Barnard, P.A.Shinn and N.Fs Frenk Lineberger | Blackwelder, No, 28 State } No. eee A.W.D.W. Continued under former order. State 4 Will Perkins i ; n € order ; vs { A.W.D.W. -Alias Capias | ‘ Rush Nicholson 94 No. 2 State —ALW.D.B. Alias Capias. vB L eee aes Pr “Raleigh Miller | os With Leave, wih John Abb Allison} | No. 25 | State i Ve Amos Gregory 4 No, £6 State ) vs L.H. Souther 7 No. 27 State vs M.A.Beam No. 28 State vs Bill Barnhardt No. 29 State vs Bill Barnhardt No. 30 State vs Mickey Johnson No. dl State vs Albert Simons No. 38 State vs | Charles Goble No. 335 State vs /Charles Goble | No. 34 State vs Parney Stewart No. 55 State vs Tom Honeycutt No. 36 State vs Adam Cranford ‘ JH.B. & R. aman materia es MONDAY, May 17th, 1920. Alias Capias. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Alias Capias. Selling Liquor. In the Supreme Court. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Alias C.c.W. Continued. Pick Pocket. Alias Capias. Petty Larceny. Continued. Mfg. Liquor. Continued. Selling Liquor. Alias Capias. Mfg, Liquor. Called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Capias. Allowed 10 days in which to renew bond. Selling Liquor. Alias Capias. Selling Liquor. Alias Capias. Retailing. Continued. MONDAY, May 17th, 1920. No. 39 State vs Resisting an Officer. Alias Capias, Bosie Conner i 1 No. 40 State vs Ed Alexander Murder. In Supreme Court, io. 43 i State | vs A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. |Tal Sherriil i\No. 45 iState | vs iR.C.Grant Abandonment. Alias Capias. iNo. 46 iState | vs Larceny. Alias Capias, i\Henry Bavis \No. 47 ‘State | vs Selling Liquor. Deft. Begin sentencé April 12th, x |Burton Charles 1920. It is ordered by the Court that the case go off the dockaty No. 48 State vs Retailing. Joe Cook Alias Caplas. iNo, 49 ‘State Mfg. Liquor. | vs Fa and Capias. \N.A.Renegar. Called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sel If bond is renewed and filed in 10 days forfeiture to be stricken out. } \No. 51 |State | VS Alias Capias to Lincoln County. Charles Little iState vs Liquor for sale. Continued under former A.H. Baker Having order, No. 54 State vs Conti a der former order Neil Hellard nuea un Yr » N6. 56 State vs Mary Hays Motion continued to May term Forgery. Open for judgment. | Burley Myers | Flake Holland | | No. 17 State )} Liquor for sale. Each of the defendants pleads | vs } guilty. It is ordered by the Court that each of D.C.Pethel | the defendants pay a fine of $50.00 and the costs MONDAY, May 17th, 1920. No. 18 State vs good behavior. Continued Under Former Order, No. 19 State vs E.J.Cain Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Yapias. — <— oo No, 20 . Srater 1. Smith vs Grover L.Smith. Affray. Continued Under Former Order, No, 21 State vs Fred Westmoreland F, & A. Appeared and showed good behavior. Continued Under Former Order. = No. 14 State C.C.W. Deft. Carl Souther pleads guilty. Nol Pros vs With Leave as to Kelly Souther. Carl Souther Kelly Souther No. 15 tate vs Carl Souther Kelly Souther Atfray. Each of the Defendants pleads guilty. <—* act ee ee No. 65 State vs Perry Cline L.S.Shook J.B.Carver J.E.Cook Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Each of the defendant waives bill and pleads guilty. F.H. Upright, of this action. No. 74 Having Liquor Contmary to Law. Appeared and showed | State |} Sodomy, Deft. called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sod | | vs Fa and Capias, | Jim Russell No. 64 State vs cC.W.Shook Having too much Liquor. Deft. pleads guilty to ¢O in bill of indictment. No. 67 State C.C.W. Deft, Called and failed. Judgment Nisi S¢ Fa and Capias, ; vs Basil Alley No. 41 State vs Bob Angle No. 68 State vs Will Morrison No. 44 i State vs Tom Henderson George Brown No. 24 Stat - vs ‘Dink Gregory ? i No. a2). & { Us State vs i? T. Smith MONDAY, May 17th, 1920, Larceny and receiving. Plea not guilty. The following jurors; C.S.King, A.B.Young, F.F.Steele, J.T.Smith, HeklGuy,;naiBubearker, J.C.Overcash, J.M. Templeton, T.W.Kestler, H.A.Barnard, P.A.Shinn and N.F.Blackwelder being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say that they find the Defendant not A.W.D.W. Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered by the Court that defendant pay to the prosecuting witness N.W.Thompson the sum of $60.00 and the cost of this action. ee Felony. Continued as to Tom Henderson. faias Capias as to George Brown e Mfg. Liquor. Defendant pleads guilty. 2S eee ee Having too much liquor. Plea not guilty. Jury No. 2 being sworn and empanrelled say that they find the defendant guilty of having too much liquor. Se a a Tis Honorable Court takes recess until, Tuesday Morning ‘Mey 18th, 1920, et 9:50 ge” WD - OE gneers vuage Pre ng. I eS a ae sidecases This Honorable Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M., Taesdeyyy,| May 18th, 1920, for the dispatch, of business. No. 76 State vs Sam Blackburm. Nog. 77 State vs Sam Blackburn Nos. 71, 72, & TS State vs David Hartness J.,Ed Johnson Cleve Pool No. 79 State vs T.H.Baker No. 78 State vs Mack Bass No. 47 State vs Burton Charles No. 69 State vs Press Bailey No. 80 State vs Press Bailey TUESDAY ,. May 18th, 1920, Liquor for dale. Defendant through his attorney waives finding of bill, and pleads guilty. C.C.W. Defendant through his Attorney waives finding of bill and pleads guilty. Fornification and Adultry. The defendans through their Attorneys waives the finding of bill and pleads guilty to the charge in the bill of indictment On motion of Solicitor, judgment is continued for two years upon defendants giving bond in sum of $200," each to appear at each term of Criminal Court and show good behavior. And it is further by the Court that each of the defendants pay a fine of $50.00 and costs of this action. Attempt to commit Rape, The det'iendant being over. 18 years of age tenders a plea of assault on 4 female, which the State accepts. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in the County Jail for term of two years tor be assigned to work at the County Home for the aged and inf'irm or on the Public roads. House-breaking and Larceny. Plead not guilty. The following jurors: C.8.King,,A.B.Young, F.F.Stee Hog | J T.Smith, Je I.,Guy, A.B; Parker, 7.C.Overcash, o.M. Templeton, T.W.Kestler, H.A.Barnard, P.A.Shinn, and | N.F.Blackwelder, being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of House breaking and Larceny. In the matter of the Sci Fa of Burton Cherles. The Court recommends that the forfeiture be strcken out if the defendant serves his full sentence of 12 months under order made at Aug. Term 1919. 1 A.W.D.W. Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered by) the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $25.00" and cost of this action. ° A.W.D.W. Defendant pleads not guilty. The follow jurors; C,.S,Kink, A.B.Young, F.F.Steele, J.T, Smit J.I.Guy, A.B.Parker, J.C.Overcash, I.M. Templeton, — T.W.Kestler, H.A.Barnard, P.A.Shinn and N.F.Blackw being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant noy guilty. No. 61 State vs Jonn Powell James Morrison Sherrill Dalton No. 62 | State | vs Floyd Campbell McKinley Tucker i | } | | i No. 62 | State | vs | George Davis | Horace Walters Term, Tuesday, May 18th, 1920, } | : i ‘ 4 ) : } } ) } | ' j : d 4 ’ j j ‘ : } ’ q } } } } 4 i } ’ } This Honorable Count takes a recess until, Wednesday Morning, May 19th,1920, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. Larceny and Receiving.. The defendants John Powell, James Morrison and Sherrill Dalton plead guilty to Larceny and Receiving. Motion for judgment against James Morrison continued until-next term of Court on condition that he pay the cost of this action and give bond in sum of, $200.00 for his appesrance ataieyf term, of Court. It is ordered by, the Court that the defendants Sherrill Dalton and John Powell, each be confined in the County Jail for a term of two years to be worked | at the County Home for the aged and infirm. House-brepking. Defendants plead not guilty. At the close of State's evidence, defendants allowed to plead M@non-suit. Allowed by Court. MURDER. Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County beginning May 17th, 1920, and sitting for the dispatch of business, this TUESDAY, May 18th, 1920, the Grand Jury of said Court in a body, 18 present and answering to their names, returned into open Court the following bill of indict-| ment in words and figures as follows; es Indictment.-- MURDER, , State of North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Tredell County. ) May Term, A.D. 1920. The Jurors for the State upon their oath present, that George “avis and Horace Walters late of the County ‘of Iredell on the 2nd day of February, A.D% 1920, with force and arms, at and in the County sags aforesaid, feloniously, wilfully, and of his malace aforethought, did kill and murder Laurrie Auten contrary to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State. Clement, Solicitor. A TRUE BILL R.L. Bradford Foreman Grand cury. a hdd Judge PrAésiding. oe | WEDNESDAY, May 19th, 1920 Tis Honorable Court convened af 9:50 o'clock, A.M., Wednesday, | May 19th, 1920, for the dispatch of business. | No. 81 | State | vs | Floyd Campbell No. 6 State vs Harvey Lee Houston No. 20 State vs Grover NO, OL State vs Albert Simons No. 58 State vs Cass Bambert No. 42 State vs T.T. Smith No. 49 | State | vs |N.A.Reneger | No. 50 | State | vs Jake Morrison | Will Poe No. 55 State vs A.H.Graham No. 57 State vs Felix Hays No. 58 State vs Marie Lynch a C.C.W. - Deft. pleads not guilty. The following Jurors: J.A.Brown, D.L.Stevenson, W.T.Mills, J.T.Nesbit, B.A, Turner, W.A.Dry, Q.A.Reed, F.H.Goodwin, J.A.Craven, F.B,Gaither, Arthur Kinder and F,.F.Steele, being sworn and empannelled for thier verdict say they find the defendant guilty of carrying concealed weapon. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in Jail for a term of 4 months with leave Commi@sioners to hire out. L.& R. Continued upon Recognizance. Good Behavior. Continued under former order. Petty Larceny. Continued by consent, Selling Liquor. Continued by consent, Too Much Liquor. Deft. Called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias, Instanta. Mfg. Liquor. Bond renewed and continued by consent. Retailing. @ontinued. Defts.to renew bond. A.W.D.W. Continued to next term unaccout of the absence of W.D.Turner, his attorney. Forgery. Conttinued for bill, AN. Te. Not a true bill. No. 59 State vs | W.A.Boyden ‘Mrs. W.A.Boyden | | No. 60 | State | VS8.- | Clem Grey | No. 65 | State | vs |Gaither Foster |R.C. Miller | No. 70 , State | vs /Ross Ellis | Aaron Weaver . |\No. 82 | State | vs |Geprge Davis | Horace Walters No. 24 State vs Dink Gregory No. 14 | State | vs | Carl Souther | | No. 15 _ vs Carl Souther Kelly Souther So. 71, 72, & 73 State vs Minnie Yates No. 64 State vs C.W.Shook State vs Perry Crate L584 *) c J.B yok J.B.Carver No. 63 consolidated with 66 #&..-. ‘ Having Liquor Co whiskey. JEDNESDAY, Mey 19th, 1920 Mfg. Liquor. Not a true bill. A.W.D.W. Capias. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Continued by” consent. To renew bond. : 7 A.W.D.W. Not a true bill. MURDER. Capias. - \V Mfg. Liquor. Deft. pleads guilty. Motion for Judgmentcontinued for two years upon Deft. giving bond in sum of $200. to appear at each Maymterm and show good behavior and paying the cost in this action C.C.W. It 14s ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in the County Jail for 4 months with leave to Commissioners to work on County Harm for the aged and infirm. Affray. It is ordered by the Court that the defend- ants Carl and Kelly Souther be confined in the County Jail for 4 months each to be worked at the County Home farm for the aged and infirm. o Fornification and Adultry. Motion for Judgment continued for two years during good behavior. Deft. to be turned over to W.W.Hotland, Supt. of Public Welfare. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. It is ordered by the Court that defendant be confined in the Common County Jail for a term of 6 months to be worked at the County Home Farm for the aged and infirm, It is further ordered by the Court that the defendant is to begin his sentence November lst, 1920, and that the said def hs to/ g¥ve,> the-sum of $300.00 for his 4: 6 v. lst, 1920... ei Mar Law, The def guilty of having received more th Perry & No. 76 & 77 State vs Sam’ Blackburn No. State vs Fred Caldwell Ho. 78 State vs Mack Bass No. 54 State vs Neill Hellard SCI FA DOCKET: (26) No. Ll State vs L.H.Souther (33) No. 2 State vs Charles Goble (43) No. 3 State vs Tal Sherrill (44) No. 4 State vs George Brown (46) No. 5 State vs Henry Davis WEDNESDAY, May 19th, 1920. Having Léaquor Contrary to Law and C.C.W. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common County Jail for a term of three months in each case to be worked at the County Home Farm for the aged and infirm, non-cumulative, sentence. Continued by consent. so pet ' ue House breaking and Larceny rt is ordered by the Court that the defendant Mack Bass be confined in the State Prison at RaleigAfor a Ferm of five years, Sentence beginning May 17th, 1920. C.C.W. To appear and show good behavior for 5 years at each May term. It appearing to the Court that the defendant has violated the order of Court. It ig ordered that Capias be issued for Deft. to appear at Aug. Term, 1920. Having Liqupr Contrary to Law. It id ordered by the Court Judgment Absolute be entered against the Defendant and his sureties for $300.00. Selling Liquor. It is ordered by the Court that Judgment Absolute be entered against the defendant and his sureties fam @ according to Sci Fa for $500 A.W.D.W. It is ordered by the Court that Judgment Absolute be entered against defdandant and his sureties according to Sei Fa. for $250.00. Felony. It is ordered by the Court that Juagment = | Absolute be entered against the defendant and his sureties according to Sci Fa for $300.00 ) Lerceny. Continued to next term ' It is ordered by the Court that the Grand Jury may go home sand to their work or business but are not discharged, It is fur ther ordered by the Court that the Grand Jury shall return under the present organi when ordered ordered by the Court and summoned by the Sheriff. May Term, 1920, Wednesday, May 19th, 1920, | NOe 87 State | V8 | Sallie May Barnerd i } A.W.D.W. It is ordered bys theoCourt “tbhatsDoyman Thompson be appointed to represent the said Sallie May Barnard as attorney in said action. The follow- ing jurors; C.S.King, A.B.Young, F.F.Steele, de we Smith, J.I.Guy, A.B.Parker, J.C.Overcash, J.M. Templeton, TWW.Kestler, H.A.Barnard, P.A.Shinn, and verdict on the following issue: Is the defendant Insane and unable to plead to the bill of indictment:? Answer. Yes. et > pee ee OP eet eet / North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) May Term, 1920. | No. 87 State } | vs 0 Sallie May Bernard | The defendant in the above named case, was arranged for trial /at the May Term, 1920, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, or a bill of indictment charging an assault with a deadly weapon. The attorney for the defendant entered the plea that the defendant was Insane and unable to plead to the bill of indictment, wherefore the jury answered the issue | submitted to them as follows: "Is the defendant Insane and unable to plead to the bill of | indictment ? Answer, Yes. It 1s thefefore ordered, considered, and adjudged by the | court that the defendant, Sallie May Barnard, be committed to the STATE | HOSPITAL for the dangerous Insane to be confined therein under the rules | and regulations prescribed by the Board of Directors under the authority ‘of the Statutes of the State of North Carolina. Thos. J.Shaw Judge Presiding. Report of Grand Jury of Iredell Superior Court, May Term, 1920. We have passed on all bills that came before us. We have visited the County Jail and find it in satisfactory condition and prisoners well cared for. There are ten Male prisoners, eight White and two colored. We also visited the County offices’ and found them in good condition as far as we were able to tell by a hurried examination, except the floor in the Register of Deeds Office: We recommend that the floor be repaired. We visited the County Home by Committee and find 44 inmates, Ten white males and Ten white females; Seven colored males and nine colored females and two white male convicts. There are Two Hundred and Fifty acres of land, One hundred and Fifty acres in cultivation, Seventy acres in small grain which we find in fine shape and promises a bountiful crop. There are Twenty head of cattle and four head of mules all of which are in good condition, Mr. W.C.Perry, Superintendant says that the County Home is now an almost self sustaining institution, ee meenne Aoessy submitted, — hb R.L. Bradford eee This Honorable Court takes agrecess until Monday Morning 24th ‘| 4920, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. | ; N.F.Blackwelder being sworn and empannelled for their | May Term, 1920, Monday Morning, May 24th, 1920. Tis Honorable Court convened at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., Monday Morning, May 24th, 1920, for the dispatch of business. It is ordered by the Court that in all civil actions the plaintiffs shall have 30 days in which to file pleadings and that the defendants shall have 30 days thereafter to file answers. It is further ordered by the Court that all civil actions be continued to next term of Court. This Honorable Court adjourns Sine die. North Carolina,} In the Superior Court. Iredell County. § May Term, 1920 Carolina Motor Company | -VS- \ JUDGMENT, 0.T.Robinson j This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1920, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, T.J.Shaw, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that summons in this action was {issued on the 27th day of March, 1920, and served on the defendant on the 30th day of March, 1920, said summons being returnable before the Clerk of the Superior on the 10th day of April, 1920, and it appearing further to the Court that the compa&aint was filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court on the 10th day of April, 1920, and that said complaint was duly verified. And it further appearing to the Court that the cause of action is based on a promisory note executed by the defendant under seal, and it further appearing that the title to the property, the payment for the purchase of which said note was executed, was reserved by said note to the plaintiff in this action and it appearing furtherito the Court that there is due on said note the sum of $1809.90, together with the interest on Same at the rate of 6% per annum from May 24th, 1918, until paid sub ject to a credit of $300.00 paid Nov. 18th, 1918; and that the amount due on said note is a specific lien upon the property described in the conditional sale m& note sét out in the complaint: NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendnat, the sum of $1562.57, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from Nov. 18th, 1918, until paid. Py It 1s further ordered and adjudged that said judgment is a spect lien upon One Indiana Truck - Model T, No. 3161, same being the property described in the conditional sale note set out in the complaint. And it is further ordered and adjudged by the Court that all equities and rights of redemption of the defendant in and to said property are hereby forever foreclosed and if this judgment is not paid by the 10th day of June, 1920, then, Dorman Thompson and R,.T.Weatherman are hereby appointed Commissioner of this Court to sell said property after due advertisement of the same ~_ eer’ said sale to the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell ounty. Thos. J.Shaw Judge Presiding. i ' Monday, August 2nd, 1920. North Carolina, | { AUGUST TERM, 1920. Iredell County.| Be it remembered that a eiseitiee Court begun and held in and for the County of Iredell on the 5th Monday before the lst Monday in September, 1920, the same being the 2nd day of August, 1920, when and where His Honor Judge, H.P.#ane, is present and presiding, and Honorable, Hayden Clement, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State. M.P.Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: A.A.Cartner, R.R.Hill, C.W.White, C.E.Sides, W.L.Keller, H.G. Morrison, J.H.Bruce, I.C.Fletcher, J.L.Reid, K.M.Hobbs, T.P.Guy, W.B. Harris, G.R.Walker, G.S.Martin, R.S.Godfrey, J.W.Hussey, Ray C.Redman, J.M.Ostwalt, J.H.Rahkin, L.W.Hobbs, J.W.Vickory, C.Fulp, J.E.Sprinkle, D.M.Templeton, W.F.Horn, R.L.Shoemaker, G.1I.8ixon, J.W.Lawrence, J.A.York, J.F.Brawley, A.H. Atkins, J.D.Clark, J.L.Harris, H.M.Sherrill, J.E.Critz and B.M. Adams. The Following riameds jurors were returnsd by the Sheriff, "could | not be found,": Yxwxttakbeox, J.H.Bruce, J.L.Reid, Ray Kedman, G.I.Nixon, J.L.Harris and B.H. Adams. The following named jurors were excused by the Court on the account of sickness etc.: W.F.Horn. The following good and lawful men were drawn and sworn as GRAND JURORS for the term, as follows: J.F.Brawley, J.W.Hussey, J.E.Sprinkle, C.W.White, R.S.Godfrey, J.A.York, A.H.Atkins, R.R.Hill, D.M.Templeton, J.W.Lawrence, K.M.Hobbs, J.D.Clark, G.S.Martin, J.E.Critz, J.H.Rankin, G.R.Walker, L.H.Hobbs, R.L.Shoemaxer. J.F.Brawley was sworn as Foreman of the GRAND JURY. B.P.Smith was sworn as Officer of the GRAND JURY. The following good and lawful men were sworn as PETTY JURORS for the first week: W.8.Harria, T.P.Guy, J.C.Fletcher, H.M.Sherrill, H.-G. Morrison, J.W.Vickory, W.L.Keller, C.Fulp, J.M.Ostwalt, A.A.Cartner, C.Be Sides, S.P.Mayhew. The last named is a Talis Juror. No. l State vs A.W.D.W. Nol Pros With Leave. Rush Nicholson , Leave No. 3 State L.& R. Somkkuxmk. Alias Capias, Va Tom Pickens * | } i No. 4 State vs Tom Pickens No. 5 State vs David Gaither | No. 6 | State | vs | Robert Woodward | No. 7 i State vs Will Bell No. 8 State vs John Teague No. 9 State vs Len Bryant Ferris Bryant No. 10 State ve | Frank Lineberger | No. 11 | State vs | Burley Myers '| Flake Holland NO. 12 State vs B..d, Cain |No. 13 | State vs ‘ | Pred Westmoreland} .| No. 14 State vs Will Perkins No. 15 State vs W.Y.Westmoreland No. 16 State vs Amos Gregory Monday, August 2nd., 1920. Li& R. Continued. A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. Too much Liquor. Alias Capias Mfg. Liquor. Alias Capias. Larceny. Nol Pros With Leave. L..& R., Nol Pros With Leave. Elopement. Nol Pros With Leave. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Under bond for Good Benavior. Continued under Foarmer order. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Under bond for good behavior. Continued under former order. Fornification and Adultry. Under bond for good behavior. Continued under former order. A.W.D.W. Under bond for good behavior. Continued under former order, A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. H.B. RL&R. Alias Capias. aera eeren ee j | | j | Best” vs L.H.Souther No. 18 State vs M.A.Beam No. 19 State vs Bill Barnhardt NO<:20 State vs Bill Barnhardt No. 21 State vs Mickey Johnson No. 22 State vs Albert Simons No. 23 State vs Charles Goble No. @4@s2 State vs Charles Goble No. 26 State vs Tom Honeycutt No. 27 State vs Adam Cranford No. 28 State vs Adam Cranford No. 29 State vs Cass Lambert No, 12 State vs BE. d, Cain Monday, August 2nd., 1920, Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Alias Capias,. Selling Liquor. Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $300.00 and the cost. And it is further ordered and decreed by the Court that xma further judgment suspended upon defendant remaining out of the State of North Carolina. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Alias Capias. C.C. Ws Continued, Pick Pocket. Nol Pros With Leave. Petty Larceny. Nol Pros With Leave. Mfg, Liquor. Alias Capias. Selling Liquor. Continued. Selling Liwuor. Alias Capias. smxRmnanxQanntyxanexireieis Selling Liquor. Alias Capias to Rowan and Iredell county Netailing. Continued. Selling Liquor. Called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sed Fa and Capias. ns og a Having Liquor contrary to Law and under bond for good behavior, It is orderéd adjudged ahd decreed by the Court that Judgment Absohute be entered against the defendant E,J,Cain and surety A.J.Cain for the sum of $100.00 and cost of Sci Bae ree | No. 50 | State | ve /Boéae Conner | NOe o1 | State oe Ralph Conner Sinclair Conner No. 32 State vs Ed Alexander Noe 35 State vs T,.T.Smith No. 34 State vs Tal Sherrill No. 35 State vs 'Seorge Brown | Tom Henderson | No.56 State vs | flenry Davis. No. 37 | State vs | Joe Cook | No. 38 | State vs |N.A.Renegar. lio. 39 State Vv J Ss Will Poe No. 40 State vs Chas, Little ake Morrison _ Monday, @ugust 2nd., 1920. Resisting an Officer. Alias Capias. MURDER. To go off docket. MURDER. To go off docket. Too much Liquor. Deft. Called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capies. A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. FELONY. Tom Henderson called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. George Brown Alias Capias. Larceny. Deft. Called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sel Fa and Capias. Retailing. Alias Gapias Mfg. Liquor.. Defendant tenders plea of guilty of forceable trespass whish plea is accepted by the State. Prayer for. judgment continued for two years upon the defendant giving bond in sum of $200.00 for his appearance at each August term to show good behavior. Keteiling, Defendants caladd and failed, Mudgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias. C.C.W. Alias Capias. No. 42 State vs A.H. Baker No. 43 State vs Neill Hellard No. 44 State vs A.H.Graham No. 45 State eo. Mary “ays No. 46 State vs Felix ays No. 47 State vs Clem Grey No. 48 State vs teither Foster R,O,Milier No. 49 State vs Basil Alley No. 535 State vs Floyd Press Edger Wooten No. 54 State vs Lee Salmons No. 55 State vs Fred Crouse Mitchell Carroll Ed Crist No. 56 vs Block Dalton ate Monday, August 2nd, 1920. Having Liquor for sale. Continued under former order, C.C.W- Under good behavior bond. Continued under former order. A.W.D.W. *rayer for judgment continued to next term — of this Court. Forgery. Continued under former order. gery Forgery. Open for bill. A.W.D.W. Alias “apias. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Each of the defendants pleads guilty of havinh more liquor than the law allows. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that xhe each of the defendants pay a fine of $200.00 each and the cost of this action, on condition that defts. give bond in sum of $200. each for their appearance at each August term for two year§ to show good behavior. C.C.W. Alias Capias. Operating Auto recklessly. Alias Capias. Abandonment. Alias Capias. H.B.L. & Re Trial as to Mitchell Cerroll. Alias Capias as. to Fred Crouse and Ed Crist. H.B.L.& R. Alias Capias, No. 59 State vs Glenn Ashbury No. 60 State vs Bene Summers No. 62 State vs Josie Bradshaw No. 65 State vs Lewis Moore No. 66 State vs Thémas Owens No. 68 tate vs Hub Bailey Hub Carson No. 71 State vs W.L.Casey No. 63 State vs Ed Garver No. 50 State vs Jim Russell Monday, August 2nd., 1920. A.W.D.W. It is ordered and adjudged that the defendant be remanded to the Juvenile Court, he being under 16 years of On £9, C.C.W. Daft. pleads guilty. Open. Slender. Defendant tenders a plea of guilty of force- able trespass which the State accepts. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that Judgment be suspended upon payment of cost. Liquor for sale. Deft. pleads guilty. Liquor for sale. Defendant pleads guilty of receiving Liquor. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and cost of this action= and give bond Ly aOR PE .0O0 for his appearance at each term of Ko a 6 Show that he has not handled liguor. A A.W.D.W. Defendants through their counsel waive bill and plead guilty as charged. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendants pay a fipe of $5.00 each and the cost in this action. Abendonment. Defendant pleads guilty. Larceny and receiving. Defendant pleads not guilty. The following jyrors; W.B.Harris, T.P.Guy, J.C. Fletcher, H.M.S errill, H.G.Morrison, J.W.Vickery, W.L.Keller, C.Fulp, J.M.Ostwalt, A.A.Cartner, C.E. Sides, S.P.Mayhew, being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of Larceny and receiving. Sodemy. It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the forfeiture and Sci “a be tricken out. Tis Honorable Court takes a recess until, Tuesday Morning, August 3rd., 1920, ati9:30 o'clock A.M.. | | i i } In the Superior Court, August Term, 1920, Tuesdey, August Srd., 1920. Tis Honorable Court convened at 9:30.o'clock A.M., Tuesday Morning, August Srd, 1920,.for the dispatch of business, No.67 State } A.W.D.W. Each of the defendants pleads guilty to A.W, vs . > Zt 6 “a and adjudged that the defendant Thomas” Albert Hobson } Simmons fay a fine of $50.00 and (1/2) one-half the eos ‘Thomas Simmons {} It is ordered and adjudged that the defendant Albert } Hobson pay (1/2) one-half of the cost. Further judgment 1 is suspended. : No. 58 s State | Selling Liquor. Detendant J.J.Cagie called and failed | vs { Judgment Nisi’ Sci Fa and Capias. ty : J.C eagle Defendant Joe Rogers pleads guilty of Lrensporaa Joe Rogers ) liquor. Prayer for Judgment continued to next term of } } Court, upon defendant giving bond in sum of $200.00. for} . } his appearance at next term. No. 50 pe State ) Felony. Deft. pleads guilty of an attempt to commit a vs { Felony eas cahged in bill of indictment. It is ordered Jim Russell } and adjudged that the deft. to be confined in ‘he Count } Jail for two (2) years with leave to County Commissio ‘ } to work at the County Farm for the aged and infirm. 2 No. 64 State } Incest. Pleads not guilty. The following jurors: vs } C.E.Sides, J.L.Reid, C.Fulp, L.A.Pope, T.P.Guy, A.A. Avery Isenhour } Cartner, A.A.Nei}l, W.B.Harris, A.B.Parker, J.C.Fletch } J.M.Ostwalt being sworn and empannelled for } their verdict say they find the defendant Avery Isenhot § guilty of Incest. t It is ordered, adjudged and decreed'that the |} defendant Avery Isenhour to be confined in the State | Prison for a term of Fifteen (15) years at hard labor | J and to wear felon stripes. a No. §2 State } MURDER. Alies Capias as to Horace Waters. vs J}. Continued fortthe State as to Geo. Davis. Witnesses Geo. Davis } to be subpoaned for next term. , Horace Waters 4 : No. 47 State vs Clem Grey A.W.D.W. Deft. pleads guilty to A.W.D.W. It 1s ordél and adjudged that §ndgment be suspended upon payment cost in this: action. No. 61 f State { Forceable Trespass. vs { Not a true bill. W.D.Daniels q No. 46 State vs Forgery. Felix Mays Nol Pros With Leave. No. 29 , Stare Having Liquor Contré to. ; wy ‘Lew. ‘The former judg! a Nisi § { an | Cass Lambert ci Fe and Capias is striken out. Nol Pros With Leave. v7 NOw 2 vs — P Russéll Parker No. 69 State vs Gus Harmon * No. 52 State vs Dock Hager Pruett nager No. 65 Stiate vs Ldwis Moore Nos *.55 State vs Mitchell Carroll No. 25 State vs Parney Stewart State vs No. 41 State vs John Goodnight No. GS State vs Ed Garver > eet nee et et eet eet ee OS oe osc ee et SR AM tt ee at A EE ot Se pe OE Harvey LiHoliston} Se eS ee * « Tuesday, August Srd, 1920, Lefcbny and Receiving. Deft. pleads not guilty. The following jurors: C.E.Sides, J,L.Reid, C.Fulp, “L.A. Pope, T. P. Guy, A.A.Cartner, A.A. Neill, W.B.,Harris, A.B. Parker, J.C.Fletcher, S.P,Mayhew, J.M.Ostwalt, being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty as charged. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant be confined in the County Jail for 10 months trie worked at the County Home Farm for the aged and niirms Abandonment. Not a true bill. A.W.D.W. Defendants plead guilty as chargedi It is ordered and adjudge that judgment be suspended upon payment of cost. Each deft. to pay one-half cost. e Having Liquor Contrary to Law, Deft. pleads guilty as charged. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $50000 and cost of this ection and: give bond in sum of $100. for his appearance at each term for two years to show good behavior. Housebreaking and Larceny. Deft. pleads not guilty. Te following jurors; C,E,Sides, J.L.Reid, C.Fulp, L.A.Pope, T.P.Guy, A.A.Cartner, A.A.Neill, W,B.Harris, A.B.Parker, J.C.Fletcher, S.P.Mayhew, J.M,Oscwalt, being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of House-breaking and Larceny It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the State Prison at Raleigh for a term of five years at hard labor and wear felon stripes. Mfg. Liquor. Deft. pleads guilty to allowing a distilery to be put up upon his premises. Judgment suspended upon payment of cost and give bond in sum of $2001/@0 for his appearance at each August term and show good behavior. Larceny and receiving. Nol Pros With Leave, Having Liquor For sale. Continued by consent. Larceny and Receiving of Horse. Judgemnt. It 4 seaeres and adjudged bynthe Court that deft, be conf ed in the State Prison at Raleigh at herd labor term of TEN YEARS and wear stripes as felon. — da. ‘ y Tuesday, August Srd., 1920 Wednesday, August 4th, 1920. fae This Honorable Court cénvened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., Wednesday, No. 70 : oy State { Forceable Trespass. Defendant through his Counsel re ee he st tone Pnepetoh Of business, vs } waives bill and pleads guilty as charged. It is T.W.Webster { ordered and adjudged by the Court that deft. pay a No. 75 } fine of ($ .01) ONE PENNY and cost of this action, State } Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Defendant pleads not | vs {} guilty. The following jurors: C.E.Sides, J.L.Reid, ee Calvin Green | reves ects ns ey Age pt po ay Re ASO rt oB, , A.B. Parker, J.C.Fletcher, J.M.Ostwalt, oo Having Liquor for Sale. Bef.@herriis, being ancen ye empannelled for their verdict say ey find the defendant guilty of Having Onis Capias. } Liquor Contrary to Law. s } It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that deft. i ) be confined in Jail to be worked at the County Home :F oe | Barm for aged enfi Infirm, for awterm of six (6) ar VE eines } months said sentence to begin Nov. lst, 1920, on _ | tec: tiquone Gapias. } condition that deft. give a good and sufficient bond " ) : } for his appearance to the Sheriff of Iredell County on Lee Norma Nov. lst, 1920 to begin sentence, otherwise sentence to begin at beginning of this Court. No. 74 State No. 27 vs Fornification and Adultry. Captas. ; State Retailing. Deft. pleads guilty. It is ordered and Clint Jorden vs adjudged that defenddnt pay a fine of $75.00 and Selma Welborn Adam Cranford cost of this action. No. 75 No. 28 State | State Selling Liquor. Deft. pleads guilty. It is ordered vs Having Liguor for sale. Capias. | 298 and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a f£ine Calvin Green | adam Cranford of $§H.00 and cost of this action. No. 76 eee, State This Honorable Court takes a recess untill, Wednesdsy Morning,| vs Mrs. W.A.Litten ' .AwW.D.W. Defendant pleads not guilty. Tye following Jurors; C.E.Sides, J.L.Reid, C.Fulp, L.A.Pope, T.P. Guy, A.A.Neill, A.A.Cartner, W.B,Herris, A.B. Parker, J.0.Fletcher, J.M,Ostwalt, H.M.SHerrill, being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of A.W.D.W. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that Judgment +isegontinued to October term of Court 1920, upon condition that defendant give bond in sum of $100.00 to keep the peace with the employees working on the Grade@ School building at Mooresville, N.C. which adjoins thé property of defendant and for her appearance at Oct. Term 1920, and payment of cost in this action. August 4th, 1920, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. piste oudge Presiding. / ee EE pe EE pee AE pee CE Et aE et CIVIL DOCKET. No. 2 Statesville Lumber Co. vs } Continued by consent. J.E,Patton and B.W.Adams | No. 3 H.W.Scott, Trustee for ov for Frick Co. $i: Mo&.Mynes witness for defendant called and } vs | ' ) failed. Capias Ad Testificandum ordered, Lie. Powell > 7; Lis Norman, and J,W. Powell. No. 22 Merchants and Farmers Bank§>/ of Mooresville j vs 0 Continued. D.A.%eam and L.A.Beam t No. 38 ‘ 3 i | In Re: Will of Cyrus L conf, Continued, acons, Caveat 1 Wednesday, August 4th, 1920, Wednesday, August 4th, 1920. It is ordered that in all Railroad cases that the present Director General and agent to be substituted in place of the Director "FIRST: Was the deed from C.M.Sharpe to Q.L.Sperpe, dated General under Federal control, - ‘about the 6th dey of Januery, 1913, ‘and recorded in the Office of the ae Ne ences a One moG% iis ace In the Superior Court, ‘Register of Deeds of Iredell County in Book 60, page 429, purporting aA to convey the land in question ever delivered ? e Iredell County.} mae Term, 1920. : ieee, to * | H. A. Sharpe and the Jury for their verdict having answered "No." | vs. IT IS THEREFORE, considered, adjudged and decreed that the | Q.L.SHarpe and wife, Blanche Sharpe, deed executed by C.M.Sharpe to Q.L.Sharpe on about the 6th day of January, Henry C,.Sharpe, Lillie Maynard Sharpe, 1913, for the lands in question, and recorded in the Public Records of Kynard Calvin Sharpe, John Quincy Sharpe, Tredell County in Book 60, page 429, was never in fact and law, delivered James Clay Sharpe, Roscoe Leeper Sharpe, to Q.L.Sharpe, and is therefore, invalid and inoperative. ee wet oe ort ae << J tH im Im Ic Irs and all unborn children of Q.L.Sharpe. ‘ And it is further ordered that the Clerk of theis Court cause the record of said deed in Book 60, Page 429, be cancelzed,of record and that the same be striken from the Index of the Public Records of said | SIRST: Was the deed from C,.M.Sharpe to,Q.L.S,erpe, dated about County, and that Q.L.Sharpe the holder of said deed be, and he is hereby a: | the 6th day of January, 1913, and recorded in the Office of the Register required to deliver to the Clerk of this Court said deed for concellation and destruction. ne ee er oe nee ener tee of Deeds of Iredell County in Book 60, page 429, purporting to convey the: | ase. land in question ever delivered ? Judge Presid ANSWER: No This Honorable Court takes a recess untill Thursday Morning, August 5th, 1920, at 9:30 A.M. | North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } August Term, 1920. Za 4 C8 udge Cae Me ete | MAK ne -VS~ Q.L.SHarpe and wife, Blanche Sherpe, IQ I= ie I= Ira Kynard Calvin Sharpe, John Quincy Sharpe, 1 4 I Henry C.SHerpe,abillié-WaynaracShappeyd oobrpe ' James Clay Sharpe, Roscoe Leeper Sharpe, } : and all unborn children of Q.L.Sharpe. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court befo his Honor H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and it appearing to Court that all the parties to the action have been duly summoned, inc the minors who are party-defendnats to the action, and appear in this through their @uard@{ans Ad Litem duly and regularly appointed by the and thet the Court having submitted the following issue to the Jury, Thursday, August Sth, 1920. Thursday, August 5th, 1920, This Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., August 5th, 1920, for the dispatch of business. Mr. Perry, the keeper reports that from 60 acres of small grain se which has recently been threashed he garnered 950 bu. He has 60 acres in Nos 7 i. | Jessie B,Van Camp, et al § Jurors with-drawn and a mis-trial took, fee 4 Ras CLOVER: | oS «are i. |! The home has 20 head of cattle 12 of which are milkers and | ’ furnish a sufficiency of milk and butter for the home. } | | re 7%. Bas ak ‘ : paz Lyf We also visited the convict camp and found it in good condition. -VS. } Judgment, Yonzsuit. Moa ar t th or [Tr testnoreena | dee beet Zaty 2alarr, There are a e camp 3 white male convicts and 3 colored, | : ? This August 4th, 1920. . | ea * Sharpe } Judgment. It is ordered and adjudged that J.P, Brawley a } this action be dis-missed for lack of | ee ee grand jury, J.R. Alexander { juisdiction in the Superior Court. The amount Augus erm, 1920. { of damages asked for not exceeding $200.00 | { wherein said action comes in the juisdiction {1 of Justice of the Peace Court. of appeal Plaintiff cepts and gives notice,to the a ; Supreme cork ES .. weaiees to give bond of This Honorable Court takes a recess untill Friday Morning, at mt a A) } $25.00. Judgment is rendered against plaintiff ; : i wie mi } and his bond for cost thtth*staohion. 9:30 o'clock, A.M., August 6th, 1920, & | No. &; ee : | J.C.Clendenin, et al } The following jurors: A.A.Neill, A.A.Cartner, -VS- } J.L.Reid, H.M.Sherrill, J.M.Ostwalt, A.B. Parker, j W.S.Clendenin W.B.Harris, W.A.Howard, L.A.Pope, T,.P.Guy, ¢.L Judge atte at C) Sherrill, C.E.Sides, being sworn and empannelled , for their verdict answer the following issue: Clendenin | vs } . 2 Ot ei Clendenin }§ lst. Are the plaintiffs the owners and entitled to the possession of the lands described tadthe complaint ? ANSWER. Yes. 2nd. What amount are the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant as rents? ’ ANSWER. $100.00 | To the Superior Court, | Iredell County. | Hon. H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding. We the Grand Jury for the August Term 1920, beg leave to submit the following report. We have passed upon all bills cent us by the Solicitor and made return of same to the Court, We visited the Jail and found 9 prisoners, 4 white, 5 colored. We found Jail well kept, clean and sanitary. We visited the different offices of Court House and found every thing well kept and records well cared for, COMMITTE VISITS COUNTY HOME. We found forty-five inmates as follows: Eight white males- two wh females, six colored males and nine females. We found two females paralytics also one white woman and colored man suffering from epilepsy. We visited the various departments of the home and found it wel kept and in good sanitary condition, We questioned the inmates as to thes fare, they say they have plenty to eat and are well treated. We wnat to congratulate the County Commissioners for having such efficient em In the canning department we found quite a lot of canned fruit last years canning and a goodly amount of new which ia constantly bdéing 54,00 abundant supply of fruits, vegetables mm@ on the farm ripens. Thursday, August 5th, 1920. Thursday, August 5th, 1920. This Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., August of damages asked for not exceeding $200.00 wherein said action comes in the juisdiction of Justice of the Peace Court. of appeal Plaintiff cepts and gives notice,to the hh p g Sond of | This Honorable Court takes a recess untill Friday Morning, at | 7 . ' 5th, 1920, for the dispatch of business. | . Mr. Perry, the keeper reports that from 60 acres of small grain | : which has recently been threashed he garnered 950 bu. He has 60 acres in ‘Nes 7 ‘ Jousie B.Van Camp, et al ©§ Jurors with-drawn and a mis-trial took. Red Clover. Mart sc et al The home has 20 head of cattle 12 of which are milkers and 7] , ~ furnish a sufficiency of milk and butter for the home. i i dy q j , = 7 . ian ak ' ¥ , |g Lyf We also visited the convict camp and found it in good condition, : -vVS. { Judgment, Yonzsuit. J “9 pa ‘ | ey een } poy reef Wy 2allar~, There are a e camp 3 white male convicts and 3 colored, - 7 | | This August 4th, 1920. | | NO. 16. JF. B a. Jno. M.Sharpe Judgment. It is ordered and adjudged that J.F, Brawley im i -vs- ~ this action be dis-missed for lack of Foreman of grand jury, : J.R. Alexander juisdiction in the Superior Court. The amount August term, 1920, | | Supreme Co $25.00. Judgment is rendered against plaintiff d is required to give j nt e we } ~ tas Gh : ' | I~ % a and his bond for cost fntthistaohion. | | 9:50 o'clock, A.M., August 6th, 1920, & | oe, » ~ | No. 23% ? J.C.Clendenin, et al } The following jurors: A.A.Neill, A.A.Cartner, -VS- } J.L.Reid, H.M.Sherrill, J.M.Ostwalt, A.B. Parker, { | w.S.Clendenin W.B.Harris, W.A.Howard, L.A.Pope, T.P.Guy, C.L ce C) Sherrill, C.E.Sides, being sworn and empannelled ; for their verdict answer the following issue: Clendenin } vs Clendenin } lst. Are the plaintiffs the owners and entitled to the possession of the lands described tnadthe complaint ? ANSWER. Yes. 2nd. What amount are the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant as rents? ANSWER. $100.00 | To the Superior Court, | Iredell County. | Hon. H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding. We the Grand Jury for the August Term 1920, beg leave to submit the following report. We have passed upon all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made return of same to the Court, We visited the Jail and found 9 prisoners, 4 white, 5 colored. We found Jail well kept, clean and sanitary. We visited the different offices of Court House and found every thing well kept and records well cared for, COMMITTE VISITS COUNTY HOME. We found forty-five inmates as follows: Eight white males- two whi females, six colored males and nine females. We found two females paralytics also one white woman and colored man suffering from epilepsy. We visited the various departments of the home and found it well kept and in good sanitary condition. We questioned the inmates as to the fare, they say they have plenty to eat and are well treated. We wnat to congratulate the County Commissioners for having such efficient managements Be In the canning department we found quite a lot of canned fruit & as eee erating and a goodly amour of new which is constantly béing 1 as abundant supply of fruits, vegetables mmm on the farm ripens. Friday,' August 6th,’ 1920. This Honorable Court convened Friday Morning,’ August 6th,’ 1920,! at 9:30 o'clock,' A.M. for the dispatch of business. Noe 21 Bs ‘ D.eB.Benson 0, W.DeHines, Director General ZT Ree Soue K = Co.) . " D.BeBenson vs W.DeHines, virector veneral of neRe (Sou. RY Co.) IsSsvUE. 1. Was the Plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint ? Ans. Yes. 2. Did the plaintiff by his own negligenoq contribute to his mmm injury as alleged in the answer ? Ans. No. 3. What damages tif if any, id plaintiff entitled to recover ? Ans. $1500.00 No. 36 HeL.Gilbert Non-suit taken as to J.F.Rhyne, Admr. of 0 vs W.A.Rhyne, deceased. J.C.Roseman,’ U.I.Rogeman, Compromised as to the other defendnats. and J.F.Rhyne, Admr. of 4 W.A.Rhyme,' deceased. 0 No. 33 North Carolina,$ Iredell Cougty.§ & vDeE.furner & Co. vs JUDGMEN?. Dre C.L.-Smith. Superior Court, Aug. term, 1920. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled for | ve their verdict answer the issues as follows; This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the court before His Honor, H.P.Lane,' Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Co that defendant has agreed to pay and has paid the plaintiff the sum demanded in the complaint,’ together with cost of the action and it further appearing that plaintiff has agreed to take a non-suit. It is therefore consideted and adjudged that the said ac in non-suited and palintiff? pay costs paid to them by the defeniant- 3 Friday, August 6th, 1920. No. 31 North Carolina,| Superior Court, Iredell County.|} Octavig, Tomlin an Daisy Woodsides and District August Term, 1920. oUVOGUER TF. Carolina, of the Grand United ' t I Garnd Lodge No. 7 of North 4 { i Order of Odd Fellows in Ameriea. This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of Court before his Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the ; | Court in this action that the summons was duly served on the defendnats + and that-theyowere preperly before the Court and that the complaint is duly verified and filed January 3lgt. 1920, and that the plaintiff's cause of action fs founded upon a contract capable of ascertaining the amount due the plaintiff, the same being upon an insurance policy on the life of Robert Woodsides for the sum of $200.00, naming in said policy of insurence Robert Woodsides directéd:the defendant the District Grand Lodge No. 7 of North Carolina, of the Grand United Order of Odd Fellows in America to change the beneficiary therein named from Daisy Woodsides to his mother, the plaintiff, Octavia Tomlin. And it further appearing that said District Grand Lodge No.. 7 of North Carolina, of the Garnd United Order of Odd Fellows in America have an office in the City of Raleigh, N.C., and in Statesville, N.C.; and 1t further appearing to the Court that the summons was duly served on the defendants on the 30th day of May, 1919, and‘the compleint has been filed as set forth above, and that no answer to said complaint has been filed by either of the defendants in this action. It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that @uiaxt Octavia Tomlin have judgment against the defendants by default for want of an answer; and is is further adjudged that Octavia Tomlin recover of the District Grand Lodge No. 7, of North Carolina, of the Grand Ynited Order | of. Odd Fellows in America the sum of $200.00 with interest thereon from | November 1st. 1919 until paid, and the cost of action to be taxed against , said defendant; by the Clerk of th , , t . ; et ae 4s Court. Oe nee . dd No. eee Sea i fi f i i 56 Saturday, August 7th, 1920, This Honorable Court convened Saturday Morning, August 7th, 1$ at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business. No. 36 North Carolina,|} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.] August Term, 1920. H.L.Gilbert -VS-" 4 U.I.Roseman, J.C.Roseman, I JUDGMENT, : — OO and J.F.Rhyne, Administrator | of W.A.Rhyne. } This cause coming on to be heard at the August term, 1920, of the! Superior Court of Iredell County, before his Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge presiding, - and a jury, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff submitted to a voluntary non-suit as to the defendant; J.F.Rhyne, Administrap tor, and it further appearing that the PBhatntaiff and the defendants have agreed to a consent judgment; : It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants, U.I.Rosemen and J.C.Roseman, the sum of Three Hundred and Ninety eight and 15/100 Dollars together with interest on said amount from the 2nd day of August, 1920, until paid and . ad the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. It is further considered, ordered and asjudged by the Court that” as between the defendants to this action that U.I.Roseman is primarily FER for the amount, of this gudgment, and in the event that the said J.C. | Ane be caused to pay this judgment that then and in that event same shall | | be deemed to be a judgment against the said U.I,Roseman and in favor of the. said J.C.Roseman,. Henry P.Lane Judge Presiding. _ | of Railresds, (Sou. Ry. Co.)§ State vs { Burton Charles Continued. BO. 65 |G .C.Lapish (aC ve § Continued. W.D.Hines, Director General} Worth Carolina, || | Iredell County. Saturdoy, August 7th, 1920. Superior Court, August Term, 1920. DURGUBERT- JeR Alexander § This cause coming on for hearing at this term of the Court before his Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff's action is for a penalty for Two Hundred Dollars under the statute of election laws and the Court being of the opinion that this Court has no original jurjediction @f of the action; It ie therefore considered and @@udged, upon motion of the defendants attorneys, that the action be and it is hereby dis-misséé‘for want of juisdiction. It is adjudged that the cost of the action be taxed against the plaintiff by the Joe folate. e —————————— Clerk of this Court. Superior Court, North Varelina, August Term, 1920 o s Iredell County. No. 40 W.W.Rankin Co. i -Vs- CHC J.Will Deaton and wife, | ZURSMENT- Euma Deaton, : t | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and the plaintiff having come into Court and submitted to a voluntary non-suit because all matters in controversy have been settled. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff be an he is hereby non-suited. It is further ordered thet the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. ‘ gaturday, August 7th, 1920. Hoe 56 North Carolina, | Iredeil County. In the Superior Court, August Term, 1920. John I.Freeze | | 9V8- 4 ‘Stella Freeze a LURGMURAE- This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court before Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered | ‘the issues as follows, to-wit: | "1st. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the complaint ? Ans; Yes. 2nd: Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart ‘for more than two successive years prior to the commencement of the abeve entitled action, as atieced in the complaint ? Ans; Yes. | Sra; Hag the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North | ‘Carolina for two years prior to the bringing of this action ? se Ans; Yes." It is hereby considered and adjudged that the bonds of mat rimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and the same ERE are hereby dissolved. | -* It ds further ordered and adjudged by the Court that Mrs. S.Ms | Reavis be awarded the custody and control gf Vada Freeze and Myrtle Freese, minor children of the said John I.Freeze and Stella Freeze, during their ~ ‘minority. iit. ————— i Ne. 37 Mooresville Motor Co. § oY3= 4 8.B.Milier 4) Ie tho defendant indebted to the Plaintiff, and if 69, in Ww enount ? os Ans; 924.00 Satumay, August 7th, 1920. Dismissed on payment of cost of Sci Fa. Parney Stewart Bo. 2 (33) State It ia ordered and adjudged that judgment Absolute be — entered againat defendant, T.T.Smith and his sureties 1.1 .Smith MeP.Eisholcon; Jéhn.EpsbBteeds Smith Lynoy for $26H,00. Hoe 3 (49) State It is ordered and adjudged that judgment Absolute be aaah entered against defendant Basil Alley, and his uuxaktsx Basil Alley Peugtees foF the sum of $100.00. vs Wo. 4 (50) State 4 ve 4 S64 Pa diamiased on payment of cost of Soi Fa. Jim Russell ' No. 11 North Caroline, } In the Superior Court, Iredell Coungy. | Ragust Term, 1920, Statesville Lumber Company }§ vs oUDGOKE TD 2, P.M.Barger and others i ; _ This cause coming on to be heard at the August Tefm, 1920, of & the Superior Court of Iredell County, before his Honer, H.P,Lane, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties to this action have settled and compromised their differences, and that said compromise has been carried out; tt 4s therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court thet the plaintiff recover nothing further in this action and that the ° defendante. pay the-costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, (Second Week) Saturday, August 7th, 1920. Monday, August 9th, 1920, ow No. 27 t North Cerolina,| In the Superior Court, 2 This Honorable Court convened at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. ,August, 9th 1920, for the dispatch of business. His Honor, Henry: P,Lane, Judge Iredell County.]} August Term, 1920. Presiding. . M.P.Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North ankin Company 5 be | Carolina returned into open Court the names of the following good and ie ic Io i@ i= Te Im Ir -vs- ] lawful men to serve as jurors for the SECOND WEEK of thés term, to-wit: : A.A. Neill i W.P.Morrison, Joe Rimmer, J,.S. Joyner, R.L.Poston, S.E,.Litten, Q,A.Hoover, S.H.Craig, J.L.Steele, V.C.Ellis, J.R.McLean, J.G.Freeze, J.H. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior ae Be Ketchie, Grover Jacks, A.M.Turner, E.C.Deaton, J,F.Walters, R.L.Kinder, Court’before his Honor, Henry P,Lans, Judge Presiding, and it appearing ts oe ; oul ot Ch eae T.J.Adkins, W.A.Thomas, R.P.Crater, J.R.Werren, J.B.Rhyne, J.L.Caldwell. that the parties to this controversy having agreed that the defendant in : a S.H.Craig is returned as being sick and excused from service. indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Twelve and 50/100 Dollars. : : Bae = A.M.Turner and JglL.Caldwell were excused on the account of It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover | - . ' ! sickness in their families. of the defendant the sum of $12.50 with interest from August 2nd, 1920, ‘ at 6 per cent. per annum and thatthe defendant pay the cost of this action ae re lo, 39 | No. 39 to be taxed by the Clerk. ro Florence Freeland Beaver, minor } Jury No. 1 being sworn and ’ Henry P.Lane ie ‘ Tudge Presiding. by her next friend W.S.Freeland } empannelled for their verdict -VS- { answer the issue as follows: No. 96 | No. 96 3 : Biogas Robert Beaver, minor and his Guardian }| Florenc Freeland Beaver, et al | North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, a Ad Litem J.W. Beaver. vs _ Iredell County. | August Term, 1920. Robert Beaver, et al | A.H. Frazier . 7 onan ISSUE. -VS- ENT, eae oe Xs Were the plaintif and defendant married as alleged in the’ ° | M.W.McLellend complaint. ? This cause coming on to be tried at this term of the Court 4 i, Answer; Yes. | before his Honor, Henry P.Lane, Judge Presiding and it appearing that the ; 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North defendant has paid the whole claim of the plaintiff. Carolina for two years immediately preeeeding the filing of this compalint? It is therefore ordered and adjudged that this action be dismts | : . Answer; Yes, — ie and the plaintiff be ‘taxed with the cost of this action. Pak : ba 3. Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, % Yo, 39 ° ther. This. Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday Morning, Aug North Cerolina,| In the Superior ‘Court me 9th, 1920, at 10:00 o'clock A.M. 7 ei ‘Tredell County} | AGatiat Sarees (SECOND WEEK) Mondey, August 9th, 1920. No. 39 Florénce Freeland Beaver, minor ] by her next friend W.S.Preeland } -VS- { JUDGMENT, Robert Beaver, minor and his Guardian Ad Litem J.W.Beaver. This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Henry P, Lene| Judge Presiding and a jury and the following issues having been submitted to the jury and the jury having answered the issues as herein set out, tenn to-wit: 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years immediately preceeding the filing of this compleint ? Answer: Yes. 3%. Did the defenddént commit adultry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer; Yes. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between Florence Freeland Beaver and Robert Beaver be and the same are hereby dissolved and that the cost of this action be taxed according to Statute. Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding. Ho. 91 | No. 91 J.W.Church 4 Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled for their -VS- } verdict answer the following issues as follows: Wilhelmina Church jf ISSUES. og ‘; 4 lst, Did the plaintiff and defendent inter-marry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, end. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceding» the bringing of this action ? Answer: Yes, Srd. DPpid the defendant commit adultry with Ray Poole as a4 in the complaint ? eee Answer: ‘Yes, * 4th. Has a child born to the plainti@f and defendant as in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, (SECOND WEEK) Mondey, August 9th, 1920. No. 91 North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Tredell County.|] August Term, 1920, J.W.Church -VS JUDGMENT, ilihelmina Church This cause coming on to be heard at the August Term, 1920, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before his Honor, Henry P,Lane, Judge Presiding, and a jury and’ haviingrhesrd, and it appearing to the Court that the jury has answered the issues: in the case as follows; . lst. Did the plaintiff and defendant Inter-merry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes. 2nd. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years preceding the bringing of thés action ? Answer; Yes. Srd. Did the defendant commit adultry with Ray Ingle as mkiugs alleged in the complaint 7 Answer; Yes. 4th. Was a child born to the pleintiff and defendant as alleged in the complaint ? Answer; Yes, It further appearing to the Court that the defendant in this action was duly served on the defendant: It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing be and the same are hereby dissolvrd absolutely. - It 4s further considered and adjudged. by the Court that the Custody of Cecil Gibson Church, the child of plaintiff and defendant be awarded to the plaintiff, J.W.Church. ; Henry P,Lane Tudge Presiding. (SECOND WEEK) (SECOND WEEK) 20. Monday, August 9th, 1920 Mondey, August 9th, 1920, mo, 21 | No« 21 Nos. 41, 42 & ae th Carolina | D.B. Benson 4 Nor rst Superior Court, -ys- ' Iredell County.} Iredell County, August Term, 1920, | John B,Payne, Director General of } JUDGMENT, j Locke Moore } |Railroads, as Agent undér section } 4 -VS- ! 206, Transportation Act 1920, f John Barton Layne, Director General } of Railroads, amd(Seands & Company. } This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of im the Court before his Honor, Henry P.Lane, Judge Presiding and a jury, and hig This cause being called, and it appearing to the Court that | Honor having submitted to the jury the following issues, which issues the Page & Moore and W.L.Davide are plaintiffs in actions against the above jury answered as herein set out, to-wit: 1. Was the plaintiff injured by | named defendants, which actions are pending and at issue at this term of the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, Court, and it further appearing that the parties have agreed that the aforesaid shall be consolideted with this action, and the issues tried 2. Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his injury as alleged in the answer ? Answer: No. 3. What damage, if any, is plaintiff together ; entitled to recover ? Answer: $1,500.00, It is, therefore, ordered that the actions of Locke Moore and It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover Errno S28 mere ee Fi Devis vs. the shove named defendants be, did ‘they of the defendant the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars,. with interest form the ot re ener ee eens SO SRE. the Sesups raised by the pieetie yaaree | ay b ‘ © 2fd. day of August 1920, at the rate of six per. cent per annum till paid, ee ee eee eee Dy CHS sory in one tris) Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding. | together with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Henry P.Lane ; Juage Presiding. | ‘ : Nos. 41, 42 & 45. No. 89 | No. 89 North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, ae | Iredell County.) August Term, 1920. -VS- . | Katie Irvin. Locke Moore, Page & Moore “af and W.L.Davis 1. Did plaintiff and defendant marry as alleged ? ie -VS~ ISSUES. Answer: Yes. John Barton Payne, Director General } 2. Did defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint 7 : of Railroads and Sands & Company. ' Answer: Yes, 5S. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State for two | ‘ 2 : years preceding the bringing this action ? . Were the plaintiff property denaged by the negligence of the Answer: Yes, Railroad Company as alleged in the complaint ? ‘Ans,; No. pee ~ 4 Were the plaintiffs property demaged by the negligence g || defendant Sands and Compeny as alleged in the compalint ? = Ans.: Ho. ere ‘ * x Ne ial om (SECOND WEEK) 357 5 Monday, Apgust 9th, 1920, (SECOND WEEK) Monday, August 9th, 1920. III. Nos. 41, 42 & 43 Waht damage, if any, is Locke Moore, plaintiff entitled to HIS HONOR, Henry P.,Lane, soles Presiding | recoter '? This cause coming on to be heard and a jury being empannelled Re nee ne en ere eee ee nnn Ans. who answer the issues submitted to them as follows, to-wit; : IN. 1. Were the plaintiffs' property damaged by the negligence , vs a i What damages, if any, are plaintiff Page & Moore entitled to of the railrod Company, as alleged in the compalint ? | recover of defendant ? ie, te. | 2. Were the plaintiffs' property damaged by the negligence of | V. the defendant, Sands & Company, as alleged in the compalint ? - What damage, if any, are plaintiff W.LIDavis entitled to recover? Answer: No. 35. What damage, if any, is Locke Moore, plaintiff, entitled to recover ? Answer: 4. What damage, if any, are plaintiffs, Page & Moore, entitled | ie 41, 42 & 43, | me | North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, oT | Teeaele Counts August. Zeru, 1980. 5. What damage, if any, is plaintiff, W.L.Davis, entitled to recover ? Locke Moore, et al — 4 Answer: -VS- LERSTR UG It is, therefore, upon motion, ordered, adjudged and decreed John Barton Payne Director General of }j that plaintiffs take nothing by their actions, and that the defendants Railroads « Sands & Company. t a recover their costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. Sands & Company - Ask the Court to instruct the jury as follows: Henry P.Lane I dudge Presiding. If you find the facts to be as testified by the witnesses in the | case you will find that there is no evidence in the case of negligence on a ' Nos. 41, 42 & 43, | the part of defendant Sands & Company and you will answer the Second issue — = Locke Moore, Page and Moore f | "Not. a and W.L.Davis 4 King, Sapp & King. ik -VS- | Appeal to Supreme Court. Rttye See, ani oF To. oe John Barton Payne, Director General } of Kailroads, and Sends & Company. | nore ot Nos. 41, 42 & 43, . Motion by the plaintiff for a new trial for errors in charge of State of North cerolina,| Superior Court, , A . the Court} Motion over-ruled. Exception by the plaintiff; Judgment ‘for County of Iredell, 4 August Term, 1920. | | ‘the defendant's exception by the plaintiff who appeals to the Supreme Court : : ‘in Open Court; Notice of appeal waived: Bond in sum Of $50.00 adjudged | Sufficient. By consent 40 days is allowed the plaintiff to serve case ¢ _ | 8Ppeal, and 50 days thereafter is allowed the defendants to serve coum Locke Moore, Page & Moore and W.L.Davis *¥8e ©ase or exception. John Barton Payne, Director General ; Sailroads, and Sands & Company. ERs nm (SECOND WEEK) Tuesday, Aggust 10th, 1920. (SECOND WEEK) Tuesday, August 10th, 1920, This Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. August 10th 1920, foP2the dispatch of business. ot do No. 58 . . a North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, a ; Iredell County.| August Tera, 1920, ust Term, ,1920. Iredell County. | Aug r Joseph Hamoy, Plaintiff Joseph Hamoy, Plaintiff. -VS- -VS- Milwaukee Mechanic Insurance Company, Mrs. C.S.Holland, J.A.Hartness, Clerk National Liberty Insurance. Company, Mrs.C,.S.Holland, Superior Court, Iredell County, and U.P. J.A.Hartness, Clerk Superior Alexander, Sheriff Iredell County, Court, Iredell County and M.P. Defendants, Alexander, Sheriff, Iredell ee County, “efendant. Tyis cause coming on to be heard at thts Term of the Iredell County Superior Court before his Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding and it is cause comi on to be heard at this term of the Iredell m i ng appearing to the Court that the palintiff Joseph Hamoy and the defendant rior Court before his Honor, H.P. ane, Judge Presidi and it we ' . : . ve Milwaukee Mechanic Insurance Company, have compromised the matters in to t t that the plaintiff Joseph Hamoy and the defendants es varie eee gua aed r " controversy in this action on the following terms, to-wit; 1 Liberty Insurance Company have compromised the matters in controversy ‘ — ' see . : . That the palintiff Joseph Hamoy is to recover of the re oe - : te or MALS BENE OF he 205 eee es ee 4 defendant, Milwaukee Mechanic Insurance Company the sum of %1250,00, with H : dant Tat the plaintif Joseph Hamey is to recover of the defen interest on the same since Dec, 24th, 1918, till paid, together with the ° t on Mgtional Liberty ‘Insurance Company the sum of $057.50, with interes costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. The amount the same since Dec, 24th, 1918, till paid, together with the cost being due and payable ‘on August 7th, 1920, being §1376,85. ° and action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court The amount being due sow EFORE, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed By the payable on August 7th, 1920, being $1034.64. Court that the plaintiff and Mrs. C.S.Holland and J.A.Hartness, Clerk of RE Court NOY TREMORS» +) Eh Ondenee, Serres’ ot ee the Superior Court recover of the defendant Milwaukee Mechanic Insurahce that the plaintif amd the defendants Mrs. C.S.Holland and J,A.Hartness,* | Co. the sum of $1250,00, and the interest on the same since December 24th, { ince " Clerk of the Gourt‘recover of the defendant National Liberty Insuran 1918, till paid, together with the costs of this action to be taxed by . th f $937.50 d th t ymber 24th, Co e sum of $ » an e interest on the same since Dece , the Clase be dite Genet: 1918, till paid, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of ‘this Court, a) : ihe Judge Presiding. R.B.McLaughlin and W.D.’Turner BY CONSENT; . BaD. Purner for Holland and Hartness R.B.Me lin for " PE " ere 3 2D. er and L,C,.Caldwell ee Te Pe (SECOND WEEK) (SECOND WEEK) Tuesday, August 10ty, 1920. Tuesday, August 10th, 1920, No. 54. Noe 100. ° ‘ Monroe Clark } — VS ) ' ISSUES. ps . North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, | : ' A 11 County. A t 20. | Dora Clark ' : - | Ingde yo ugust Term, 1920 | L. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the | ~ e Mooresville Motor Company i palint 7? ’ ; -VS- 4 JUDGMENT, com , ey me SSS | Answer: Yes, 1, | d.A.Sharpe. 4 , - dent of thé State of North’ ; | ,2,- Has the plaintiff been a resident o This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Henry P. | Carolina for two years immediately préceding filing of the complaint in | this action 7° Lane, Judge Presiding and being heard and it appesring that the parties to this controversy have settled all their matters of differences out of' Answer: Yes. Court. it adultry with Isaac Sherrill as | ee : It_is therefore ordered and adjudged that this action be | alleged in the complaint 7? dismissed and that the cost of this Court be paid by the defendant. | Answer; ‘Yes, Henry P,#ane Jua@ge Presiding, No. 54) No. 54 | | North Carolina,|) In the Superior Court, ‘ No. 53 : . North Carolina, } In the Superior Court : ust Term, 1920. : . | Iredell County.) Aug ’ BS Iredell County. } August Term, 1920. oe Clark -VS- | JUDGMENT. Lee Shoemgyer § j | Dora Clark : S- t JUDGMENT. Minnie Showemsker 4 This cause ‘coming on to be heard before his Honor, Henry P, Lane | Judge Presiding and a gury and.peing heard and the Judge having submitted This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Buperior | the following issues, which issues were answered as herein set out, to-wlts i Court of Iredell County before his Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding and the a Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complaint 7 e following issues having been submitted and answered by the Jury: Anawer: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident ‘of the State of North © lst. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in Cerolina for two years immediately preceding the filing of the compalint in the complaint ? this action ? Answer; Yes. 3. Did the defendant commit adultyy with Isaac ' Answer; Yes, , * Ea E t of the™ Sherrill as alleged in the complaint ? Answer; Yes, : 2nd. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident o he aie ei honda of matrimemee | Stat the commencement of It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony € of North Carolina for two years next preceeding the heretofére existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and. the seme : | this ection ? ? oe hereby dissolved, and it is further ordered that the cost be taxed acc | Answer; Yes, to the Statutes in such cases provided. Tae ae —_ 3rd. Did the defendant, commit adultry as alleged in the — & Somplaint g © ot ae ? 8 thawer: “ves.” | It ig therefore considered o ved. It 1 362 No. ———-— 87 (SECOND WEEK) Tuesday, August 10th, 1920. No. 87 | North Cerolina,} In the Superior Court, | Iredell County.) August Term, 1920, .L.owann -VS- dUD GEER ®. | Jessie Swann Thgs cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before his Honer, H.P.fane, Judge Presiding and the following issues having been submitted and answered by the Jury: lst. Did the plaintiff and defendant inter-marry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, 2nd. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for Two years next preceeding the commencement of this action ? Answer: Yes, $rd. Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the . compzaint 7? Answer: ‘Yes. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the bonds of \iednony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved. | It is further ordered that the palintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. Henry P;Lane Juage Fresiding. | No. 87 | J.L.Swann 4 -VS- Q ISSUES. | Jessie Swann }j lst. Did the palintiffeand defendant inter-marry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer: Yes, 2nd. Hes the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the S * of North Carolina for Two years next preceeding the commencement of this we Answer: Yes, ord, ‘ | Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer; Yes, fo, 50 (SECOND WEEK) Tuesday, August 10th, 1920, No. 53. a eels Lee Shosmaker Sage Re -VS« Minnie Shoemaker lst. Did the plaintiff and defendant inter-marry as alleged in the complaint ? ; Answer; Yes, end. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for Two yeard next preceeding the commencement of this rit action ? Answer: Yes. Srd. Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the | complaint , Answer: Yes, | No. 50 | | F.F,Chambers } f. “We Q ISSUES. | Lucy Chambers } 1. Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the | complaint 7 Ans,: Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North | Carolina for Two years next before the beginning of this action 7? Ans,: Yes, 3. Did the defendant Lucy Chambers commit adultry as alleged 7? Ans.: ‘es. No. 50, P.B.Chambers 4 -VS- } The issues tendered by the defendant. Lucy W.Chambers, } ; First; Did the plaintiff and defendant inter-maerry as alleged in the answer ? Answer; Yes, slates cwamci deni asain casement! (SECOND WEEK) Tuesday, August 10th, 1920. 4, Second: Did the plaintiff, while they lived together as man and wife, by cruel and barbarous treatment, endanger the life of the defendant and offer such indignities to her pérson as to render her condition intolerable and her life burdonsome, as alleged in her answer ? Answer: Yes. O% Fifth: Did the phaintiff drive the defendant from his home as alleged.in the Fifth Paragraph of her answer ? Answer: No. 6. Has the defendant Lucy Chambers been a resident of this State for Two years before filing her answer in this action ? Answer: Yes. : This Honorable Court takes recess untill Wednesday Morning, August llth, 1920, at 9:30 o'clock A.M. udge pres at (SECOND WEEK) Wednesday, August llth, 1920, This Honorable Court convened Wednesday Morning, August llth, 1920, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business. No. 79 Clyde Miller, Agt. for Mary E,Miller } —— } Continued, G.E.Sweet and L.L.Fisk. } No. 88 W.W.Rankin Co. ) -VS~ { Continued, G.M. Josey. ) Wo. 37 | No. 37. | Mooresville Motor Co. 4 -VS- 5 S.%. Miller. ' This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Henry P,. JUDGMENT. Lane, Judge Presiding and a jury and being heard and the jury having, found that the palintiff is entitled to recover of the defendant the sum of Twenty-four Dollers. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintif | recover of the defendant the sum of Twenty-four Dollars with interest at six per cent from August 2nd, 1920, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Henry P.Lane Judge Presiding. No. 92, Oe Fee Raymond W.Woodward | -VS- § Lola Woodward 4 Did pheintiff and defendant inter-merry as alleged in the Complaint ? Answer; Yes, Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Cerolina for more than two years before bringing this action ? Answer: Yes. Answer: Yes. Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint ? | (SECOND WEEK) (SBCOND WEEK) Wednesday, August llth, 1920, Wednesday, August llth, 1920. Noe 89. Be No. 51] No. 51. North Caroline,} Superior Court, State of North Carolina, } Superior Court, Iredell County.) ; August Term, 1920, eee EE i | oe ; — re 3 James Ervin, Plaintiff,]} | | | W. JkMorrison and wife, M.B.Morrison § if -VS- it JUDGMENT. | i | an i ISSUES. bs | Kittie Ervin. | ! Southern Railway Company. : This cause coming on to be heard at this termuof the Court, : 1. Was the femme plaintiff injured by the negligence of the — before his Honor, Henry P,Lane, Judge and a jury, and being heard upon | Aézentent.. an witened te tee ees | : ' the evidence submitted and the whole record, and the jury having found Answer: No. the defendant guilty. 2. Did the plaintiff ,by her own negligence , contribute to the It is therefore issued and alleged before the Court that the: injury, as alleged in the answer ? Bond of matrimony existing between plaintiff and def'endang& be and is Answer: Yes. , "cela hereby dissolved, 3. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover ? Henry Pp, Lane vudge Presiding. Answer: me lo, 50 | No. 50. No. 51; No. &1. North Carolina,} Superior Court, | North Yarolina,| Superior Cburt, Iredell County.§ August Term, 1980. | Iredell County. } August Term, 1020. fe F.F.Chambers, W.J.Morrison and wife, M.B.Morrison } -VS- i : JUDGMENT s¥iia { | Lucy Chambers, 9 John Barton Payne, Director General, } JUDGMEN qT. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, as Agent under the Act of 1920. { ; before his Honor, Henry P,Lane, Judge and a jury, gnd being heard upon This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, the whole record, and issue submitted, and the jury having found that before his Honor, Henry P,Lane, Judge Presiding and a jury, and bing heard the plaintiff was guilty of the Act of Infidelity as alleged in the upon the evidence submitted and the whole record, and the jury having found complaint, twat the plaintiff was not injured by the negligence of the defendant 48 It 4s therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the alleged, it is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the Bond of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant is hereby, plaintiff recover nathing, because of the said suit, that the defendant dissolved, and that the plaintiff be and is hereby free and discharged recover the cost of the action, to be paid by the plaintiff and go hence from all liability of any king whatsoever, because of the relation without day. existing between them. It is further ordered that the plaintiff recover the cost of the | Y action ta be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, opt ara (SECOND WEEK) Wednesday, August llth, 1920, No. 92. North Cerolina,} In the Superior Court, | Iredell County.) . August Term, 1920, | Raymond W.Woodward § “e* } JUDGMENT, | Lola Woodward. 5 This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before his Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having found all sme issues submitted, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant as set out in the record, It is therefore, considered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved. It is further considered and adjudged that the | plaintiff pay the costs of action as taxed by the Clerk. Henry P.fane Judge Presiding. No. 25 No. 25. Nobth Carolina,} Superior Court, Iredell County. } August Term, 1920, Statesville Lumber Co. } ir -VS- { JUDGMENT. v | | | JeW.Webb. i This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, _before his Honor, H.P,lane, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court |- that the parties to the action adjusted their differences, It is therefore | } _J.W.Webb, the sum of ($1700.00) Seventeen Hundred Dollers, with interest from August 2nd, 1920, until paid and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. BY CONSENT: ov Lo & Jurne or defendant, _ considered, oredered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant} (SECOND WEEK) Wednesday, August llth, 1920. No. 86-6 North Carolina,)- In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } August term, 1920, L.c.Church, Administratrix } of J,Everett Church 0 -VS- ) JUDGMENT, R.L.Church. q It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in the above entitled cause, comes into Court and takes a voluntary non-suits It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff be charged with the costs in this case to be taxed by the Clerk. Henry P.Lane Judge Presiding. This August 7th, 1920, No. 60. | State } C.C.W. Defendant pleads guilty of C.C.W. It is therefore | vs ) ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the Deft. | Gene Summers ) pay a fine of. $50.00 and costs of this action, This Honorable Court takes recess until Thursday Morning, August | 12th, 1920, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., Se. This Honorable Court sonvened Thursday Morning, August 12th," 1920, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M., for the dispatch of business. No. 67 State vs Albert Hobson No. 68 State vs Hub Carson No. 68 State vs Hub Bailey No. %0 State vs W.T.Webster No. 25 State vs Parney Stewart No, 98 vs No. 99. vs T.A.Miller. No. 8 et al vs R.S. Templeton John Weddington 4 American Whole- } sale Corporation} Jessie Van Camp,} , P,B.Kennedy and | H.C.Hunter, (SECOND WEEK) Thursdeg, August 12th, 1920. A.W.D.W. Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi ' Sci Fa and Capias,. A.W.D.W. Defendant cailed and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias, A.W.D.W. Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Capias, Forceable Trespass. Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias, Mfg. Liquor. Defendant caled and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci *a and Capias. Continued, Continued, . Continued by consent. | Hack Goodman (SECOND WERK) Thursday, August 12th, 1920, No. 10 W.P.MeLainy et al { vs } Continued under former order, Miller-McLain Supply Co, t No. 13 Statesville Lumber Co, ) vs } Cc.utinued by consent, J,E,Horton. ) No, 16 Core Byers 4 | vs ) Continued, | Lester Byers 4 No. 17 | Iredell Farmers Union Warehouse j | vs $ Continued, | | B.K.Hi11, et al | No. 24 | P.B. Kennedy t Vs } Continued. | H.C.Hunter | | No. 26 | | Bert Ray Conner t vs } Continued, : Mooresville Cotton Mills Co. i No. 32 ° Boyce Lumber Co, vs } Continued. J.Burette Houpe. No, 34 Della Walker vs 1 Continued, flarvey Lee Walker, No, 45 J.H. Lee vs huge eee oa eas (SECOND WEEK) Thursday, August 12th, 1920, Continued, Mack Goodman No, 47 Mrs. Tina B.Morrow, Admx. of W.O.Morrow Vs - Continued, W.L. Poston. No. 48 Walter Morrow, minor by his next friend, Mrs. Tina B.Moprow vs Continued, W.L. Poston. No. 49 W.C.Moore vs Continued, J.P.Patterson No. 62 Wik, Bix vs Continued, C.D.Moore No. 635 Commissioners of Upper Third Creek |} vs } OffttheeDocket, on by error. JeE.Boyd, et al ) No. 64 G.M.Simpsom vs § Continued, Fred H,Conger No. 68 Turner Mills Co, 4 vs Q Continued, W.D.Hines, Director General of R.R. } No. 69 C.V.Henkel and Pless "aker, Trading as Henkel & Baker vs W.D.Hines, Director General of R.R, Nos.”790; TL, 72 & 73. Henkel-Craig Live Stock Co. vs W.D.Hines, Director Venerai of Rail- | roads, (Sou. Ry. Co.) No. 74 | Statesville Lumber Co. vs } | J.C,.Roseman, | A.H.Cashion, et al vs G.S.Page, et al | No. 77 | Statesville Lumber Uo. vs | R.M.Current,. No. 85 | H.H.Yount and A.Y.Alexander, Trading &8 Yount & Alexander vs Charles U.,Harris, et al No. 90 gy? Mrs..S,I,Pesperman, et al « MB The Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N.C. No. 93 John H. Thompson we Let H.P.Carter, et al Hi (SECOND WEEK) Thursday, August 12th, 1920, 4 } } ; : ) : Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued, Continued. en i a No. 95 Flynt Stevens vs C.V.Elam. No. 80 S.B.Frazier vs Thomas Eidson of are continued, (SECOND WEEK) Thursday, August 12th, 1920, Auto Co. ) ) Continued, § Continued, zt is ordered by the Cours. that all Civil Cases not disposed No. 25. Lae een (SECOND WEEK) Thursday, August 12th, 1920, Béorth Carolina,|} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.|} August Term, 1920, Stapesville Lumber Co.$ vs 4 _—_— —_— ee I.W.Webb. - q This cause coming on to be heard at the August Term, 1920, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before his Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to ‘the Court that the plaintiff and deferdant have settled and compromised all matters in controversy upon the payment of the sum of Seventeen Hundred Dollars to the plaintiff by the ihiai. and it appearing to the Court that the defendant has paid to the plaintiff the amount due by the terms of said compromise: It as jtperefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that flat further in this action, and that the defendant A _ be non-suited in the above cause, and that said plaintiff pay the es : Noe 21. D.B.Benson 4 vs 4 JohnHBarton Payne, Director General} of Kailreads. q : Defendant give notice to the Supreme Court as shown by the record, Notice of appeal waived. Bond in the sum of $50.00 adjudged sufficient. By consent 40 days is allowed the defendant to serve case on appeal, and 40 days thereafter is allowed the plaintiff's to serve counter-case or exceptions. It is ordered by the Court that in all Civil actions the plaintiffs shall have 30 days in which ti file pleadings and that the defendants shall have 30 days thereafter to file answers. No. 71 State § ABANDONMENT. £t. eads guilt 1 Dig Te HOF” 98 by. the, Za ) that the defie dha pot Bo far Fe¥ther, vs the defendant pay to Susie Casey, his wife the sum of. $10. t per week, If the defendent fails to pay the sum of $10.00 week then the Clerk is ordered to issue Capias for deft. returnable to the next regular term and the Solicitor may Pr { judgment at that term, North Carolina, } Iredell County.} R.D,.Ballard q -VS- } NON-SUITED, A.P.Davidson } ; It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in the above, entitled cause comes into Court and takes a voluntary non-suit. IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered and adjudged that the said. plat W.L.Casey In the Superior Court, August Term, 1920, _ taxed by the Clerk, - lo. 50 | No. 50, Aenean etinans .| State of North Carolina,|} pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, It is ordered that the judgment hereto signed be set aside and this substituted, . ‘ Be rey Henry P. Lane Judge Presiding, | Superior Court, County of Iredell. 5 August Term, 1920. _F.F.Chambers 4 vs } JUDGMENT. | Lucy W.Chambers. § j The defendant, Lucy W.Chambers, by and through her counsel, moves that the judgment rendered in the above cause at this term of the Court be set aside; and the defendant further moves, through her counsel, for judgment in favor of the defendant on the issues found by the jury and to set aside the verdict on the ground of newly discovered evidence. ~ It is ordered by the Court that the judgment rendered at this term of the Court be, and the same is hereby set aside, and that the... + : motion of the defendant for a judgment upon the issues answered by the Jury be continued until Monday, 23rd day of August, 1920, to be heard by consent, in Concord, North Carolina, ~ (SECOND WEEK) Thursday, August 12th, 1920. | No.57 | No.57. | | Joseph Hamoy d , : \ NON-SUIT. RhodeiIshand Insurance Co. } ee e This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Henry P.Lane, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff in the’ action takes a voluntary non-suit,. If IS, THEREFORE, ordered and adjudged that the said plaintiff be nee eeNOnN errr trees teen ee non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, No.59 No. 58. | Joseph Hamoy } -VS- ) NON-SUIT. Globe and Rutgers insurance Co.} This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Henry P.Lane, judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff in the said action takes a voluntary non-suit. IT IS, QHEREFORE, ordered and adjudged that the said Plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action. No.61} No. 61. Joseph Hamoy ) -VS- ' Union Insurance Co. q NON-SUIT. This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Henry P, Laney Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff tn said actéionutakes a voluntary non-suit,. IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action. No. 84, North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, edell County.} August Term, 1920, @illuspie=Shieldsv& Company , Trading une¥S-.: style @nd anme TVASMAlLOF land:Alvin Miller, trading under the style dnd name of T.A.Miller & Son, 4 Ee It appearing to the Court thet the Plaintiff in the above en cause Oe oe and een eeee non-sulit; 1d 8 therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the sa paatntiff be non-suited in the above was. and that the pana pleint: charged with the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. pene P, Lane e o is (SECOND WEEK) August Term, 1920. North Caroling, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § August Term, 1920, Lule C.Dinglehoef and husband J.H. Dinglehoef, and Mamie Efird { f “VS- (JUDGMENT. | W.A.Lutz, Executor and Trustee urlder the will of | Esther C.Lutz, deceased and Wi.A.Lutz, individually. This cause comimg on to be heard at the August Term, 1920 of the Superior Couft of Iredell County, before His Honor, Henry P.Lane, Judge Presiding, and being heard upon the pleadings filed in the cause, | and it appearing to the Court from the complaint and the admissions in | the answer that Esther C.Lutz, late of Iredell County, is dead, having | left a last will and testament and two codicils thereto, as set out in the complaint; and it appearing further, that W.A.Lutz was named Executor | in said last will and was duly appointed by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County as such Executor; and it appearing further that | the plaintiff, Lula C.Dinglehoef and Mamie Efird are the only hetts-at- | law of Esther C,Lutz. And it appearing further that a farm located in Davidson County was sold by the said Executor, and that:undertthasterms of said will said executor retained one-third of the proceeds of said sale, or the sum of $5,346,03 as trustee under said will; and the court being of the opinion that the trust attempted to be created by said will and codicil is so vague and indefingte as to be incapable of performance, and that same is therefore void and of no effect. IT IS THEREFORE, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the trust appempted to be created by said will and codicil is hereby Geclared to be void and of no effect. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that the said W.A.Lutz, trustee, under said will and codicil, shall pay out of the funds in his hands as said trustee, the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, and shall then pay one-half of the balance remaining to Lula C.Dinglehoef and one-half to Mamie Efird, Henry P,.Lane _ Judge Presiding. — In the Superiop Coust, Before the Clerk, September, 10th, 1920. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} H.H.Yount and A.Y.Alexander, § trading and doing business under t the firm name of Yount & Alexander,] -VS- ! Charles U,Harris and wife, Sadie \ R Harris. ' This cause coming on to be heard and being heard upon the verified compkaint filed in this cause setting up the fact that there has been a breach of an express contract on the part of the defendants, and it further appearing that personal service of summons was duly madectiipon the defendants and that more than twenty days has elapsed since the return day | mentioned in said summons and that no answer has been filed by the said defendants in said cause and it further appearing to the Court that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $220.00 and interest on the same since June 20th, 1919 and that payment has been demanded and refused, It is now, therefore, ordered adjudged and decreed by the Court that the plaintif recover of the defendants, or @ither of them the sum of $220.00, with interest on the same from June the 2Cth, 1919 until paid together with the cost of this action and for such othér and further relief as may be just and proper. This Sept. 10th, 1920. J.A.Hartness Clerk of Superior Court. j In the Superior Court, Before the Cler, September 13th, 1920. North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Sept. 13th, 1920. The First National Bank of } Mooresville, N.C. } -VS- t JUDGMENT. W.F.Smith, R.L.Smith and J.S.archer, } trading under the firm name of | Smith Bros. } This cause coming on to be heard before J.A.Hartness, C.S.C, and it appearing that the summons and a copy of the complaint was served on J.S.Archer, on Aug. 25, 1920, more than ten days prior to the return day, to-wit: Sept. 6fh, 1920, and the summons and copy of the complaint was accepted by W.F.Smith and R.L.Smith, on Aug. 14, 1920 more than ten days prior to the return day, Sept. 6, 1920 and it further appearing that the complaint properly verified was filed in the office of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N.C., on Agust 14, 1920, and it further appearing that no answer has been filed, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $500.00 with interest from June l, 1919 at the rate of 6 % per annum until paid ahd the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. This the 13th day of Sept., 1920. J.A.Hartness Gee Us In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, September 13th, 1920, ‘North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County.fre cll Sept. 13th, 1920, The Merchants & Farmers Bank, Inc. of Mooresville, N.C. W.F.Smith, R.L.Smith and J.S.Archer, j 4 -VS- I trading under the firm name of Smith Bros., j W.F.Smith, R.L.Smith and’ J.S.Archer, t } | personally & Individually. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before | J.A.Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N.C., the Court from the evidence finds the following facts: | executed by Smith Bros. That the action is based upon a promissory note under seal and W.F.Smith, R.L.Smith and J.S.Archer to the Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N.C.; that the note in suit is | for the sum of $600.00, dated Feb. 6, 1919, due & payable Six months | after date, with interest from Oct. 6, 1919, and that the entire | principal with lawful interest from Oct. 6, 1919 remains unpaid; that that summons in this action has been properly served upon the defendants | service of summons; that no answer has been filed in said action. | and that service was had more than 10 days before the first Monday in | September 1920; that at the time of the issuing of the summons a verified | complaint was filed in this Court, and further that a copy of the verified | complaint was served upon each defendant personally at the time of the It is therefore, upon the foregoing findings of facts, Considered, adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, the Merchants & Farmers Bank Inc. of Mooresville, N.C., heve & recover of the defendants and all of them jointly and severatly the sum of $600.00 with interest thereon at the rate of 6 % from Oct. 6, 1919 until paid, together with the cost of this action. This Sept, 13th, 1920, eee North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.|] W.W.Rankin Co, { vs. ae Order reviving ie Ic hs, {@ i= it i= Ina Mrs. Jane L.Foster. } It appearing from the return of the Sheriff of Iredell County, upon the notice issued in the above entitled action, that the defendant therein was duly notifiei to appear at the office of the undersigned on the 30th day of Dec. 1918 and show cause, if any she had, why execution should not isstie on the judgment described in said notice; and it further appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that said judgment has not been Satisfied, and the said defendant having failed to appear, as summoned to do, and show cause why execution should not issue: [t is therefore ordered and adjudged that said judgment be and the same is hereby revived, to the end that execution may be issued, This 30th day of Dec., 1918. J.A.Hartness Monday, October 18th, 1920. North Carolina, } 4 October Term, 1920. Iredell County. Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the County of Iredell on the 6th Monday after the lst Monday of Septener 1920, the same being the 18th day of October, 1820, when and where His Honor Henry P,Lane, Judgegsis present and presiding, and Honorable, Hayden Clement, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, M.P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit:- D.H.Perry, J.R.Winecoff, M.L,Davis, J.S,Morrison, J.H.Cloaningen Jr., d.A.Stewert, C.A.McLellend, L.H.White, C.M.Wagner, W.F.Browning, W.H, Clark, W.E.Webb, A.W.Gudger, J.P.Watts, R.W.Windsor, J.D.Hartness, a W.M.Clodfelter, J,B,Marshall, W.P.Morton, W.H.Dingler, N.A.Beaver, R.C. Morrison, E.E.Johnston, L.R.Smitn, Walter E,Gaither, N.A.Eidson, H.5S. Goodnight, W.C.Austin, J.W.Heath, J.L.Cowan, C.E,Pattermrson, T.R.Alexander, W.M.Boges, Geo. A,Watts, and L.O.White. The following named jurors were returned by the Sheriff, "could not be found,"; M.L.Devis, J.H.Hoke, and H.S.Goodnight. The tiollowing named jurors were excused by the Court on the account of sickness, etc. : J.A.Stewart, L.O.White, J.S,.Morrison. The fiollowing good and lawful men were drawn and sworn as GRAND | JURORS for the Term: Walter E,Gaither, R.C.Morrison, W.H.Clark, D.H. Perrys) J.D.Hartness, ® R.W.Windsor, J.L.Cowan, J.H.Cloaninger, Jr., E.E. Johnston, L.R.Smith, W.E.Webb, N.A.Beaver, W.M.Bogges, N.A.Eidson, J.W.Heath, Geo. Ae Watts, R.C.Morrison was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. L.A.Bogges was sworn as Officer of the Grand Jury. The following good and lawful men were sworn as PETTY JURORS for the first week; C.A.McLelland, W.H.Dingler, J,R.Winecoff, L.H.White, C.E.Patterson, W.C.Austin, W.M.Clodfelter, W.P,Morton, J,.P.Watts, J.B. Marshall, H.R.Mayes, W.R.Stout, F.H.Goodin. No. l State Alies Capias. vs Tom Pickens No. 2 State vs Tom Pickens No. 3 State vs , David Gaither No. 4 State vs Robert Woodward No. 5 State vs Will Bell No. 6 State vs B,0.,Cain No. @ State vs Fred Westmoreland. No. 8 State vs Will Perkins No. 9 State vs W.Y.Westmoreland No. 10 State vs Amos Gregory No. 11 State vs L.H.Souther Ho. 12 State vs Ball Barnhardt No. 13 State vs Bill Barnherdt, No. 14 State vs Chas. Goble No. 15 State vs Chas, Goble Monday, October 18th, 1920, A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. To much liquor. Alias Capias, . t apie Mfg. Liquor. TDabel phias Capes Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Continued under former or#er. Fornification and Adultry. Appeared and showed good behavior. Continued Under Former Order. A.W. DW. er Under Former Order. A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. H.B. & Le Alias Capias. Having Liquor Contrary to Law. Alias Capias. Having liquor contrary to law. Alias Capias. C.c.W. Continued. Mfg. Liquor, Alias Capias. Selling Liquor. Vontinued. a] No. 16 p: State vs Parner Stewart No. 17 tate vs Tom Honeycutt No, 18 State vs Boise Conner No. 19 State NO, 20 State vs Tal Sherrill Noe. eh State vs ‘ George Brown Tom Henderson Noe 22 State vs Henry Davis No. 23 State vs Joe Cook No. 24 State vs N.A.Renegar No. 26 State vs Chas. Little No. 28 State vs John Goodnight No, 28 State vs A.H. Baker. No. 29 State vs Neill Hellard — VS = oS — ot et oo et et et SoS eo et et i root et et et ot << et a ‘Mfg. Monday, October 18th, 1920. Mfg. Liquor. Continued under former order. Liquor. Alias Capias. fe mM oO bh ee he: ~~ ol Resisting an Officer. Alias Capias. Too much liquor. Alias Capias. A.W.D.W. Alias Capias. Felony. Alias Capias. L.&R. Alias Capias. Ketailing. Alies Capias. Liquor. Continued under former order. C.C.W. Alias Capias, Having liquor Contrary to law. Deft, Called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sci Fea and Capias. Having liquor contrary to law, Continued under former order. C.C.W. Continued under former No. 51 State vs Mary Hays No. 32 State vs GUgither Foster R.C.Miller No. 33 State vs Desil Alley No. 36. State | vs | Floyd Press Edgar Wooten 36 te wea MO WM e Crouse Vv Fred Crist 0 t Ed No, 37 | State | vs | Block Dalton Ig 58 te (1S <4 ceteO Cc, me .Cagle No. 39 State vs | Joe Rogers No. 40 State vs Lewis Moore No, 41 State vs Thomas Owens No. 44 State vs ' Clint Jordon Salma Welborn No, 54 State vs : Joe Houston ee et Se et cot at <a t <tc ot ee ae oe oe ee Sa oOo ja oe <—S co ee Monday, October 18th, 1920, Forgery. Continved under former order. Having liquor contrary to law, Continued under former order. C.C.W. Alias Capias. Operating Auto Alias Capias. rs @ Qo ay ia + @ w n te << ° H.B.& L. Alias Capias. H.B.& &R. Alias Capias. Selling Liquor. Alias Capies. Selling Liquor. Liquor for sale. Appeared and showsd good behavior. Continued under former order. Liquor for sale. Appeared and showed Continued under former order. Fornification and Adultry. Alias Capias. A.W.D.W. andlpzeads guilty. Court that defendant pay 4 this actions Continued under former good It is ordered and adjudged fine of $10.00 and co order. behavior. / the t of ' wee The defendant through his Counsel oy bill een T NNT EET NTE ene No. 60 State vs Dolph McMullis Mason James John Staton Ros. 10 State vs ..G.Wooten No. 74 State vs Clyde Gregory Mink Albea No. 535 State vs John D, Hardy No. 59 State vs Eugene Stockton No. 47 State VS L.H.Hoover No. 45 State vs Claud Allison Noe, 71, 72.& 79, 78 State vs Walter Cowan Clem Grey ‘Monday, October 18th, 1920, Gambling. Each of the defendants through their Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of Gambling, A.W.D.W. Tne defendant through his Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of A.W.D.W. It is ordered . end adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $10.00 and cost of this action. SIMPLE ASSAULT. The defendant through his Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty to SIMPLE ASSAULT. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that dudgménttiscsuspéhredof upon payment of cost of this action. A.W.D.W. Defendant through his Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of A.W.D.W. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspended upon payment of cost in this action. Having Ligquor contrary to law. Defendant through his Counsel waives bill end pleads; guilty of receiving more than one quart of liquor. It 1s ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $20.00 and cost of this action. Retailing. The deffendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of receiving more than one, quart of liquor. Liquor for sale. Defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of receiving more than one guart of liquor. Retailing. Det'endant through his-counsel waives bil} and pleads guilty.of retailing. Retailing. Defendant through his counsel waives pill ) and pleads guilty.of retailing liquor. ‘ C.C.W. & A.W.D.W. as to each defendant. Each detendant pleads not guilty. The following jurors being sworn and empannelled for their verdict; C.A.McLellend, W.H.Dingler, J.R.Winecoft, L.#.Wnite C.E,Patterson, W.C. Austin, W.M.Clodfelter, W. P. Mor J.P.Watts, J,B.Marshell, H.R.Mayes and F,H,Goodin they find the defendant Walter Cowan guilty of C. and A.W.D.W. and Clem Grey guilty of C.C.W. and & D.W. as charged in bill of indictment. ae This Honorable Court takes a recsss until Tuesday morning Oct 1920, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. , Tuesday Morning, October 19th, 1920, This Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. Tuesday Morning, October 19th, 1920, for the dispatch of business, No. 61 State vs Tally Johnson Juhue Davis No. 65 and 60 State vs Dolph MceMullis No. 60 State vs Ely Sutton John Staton Mason James No © 53 State vs John D, Hardy No. 75 State vs Clay Sloan No. 69 State vs Mrs. W.A,Litten No. 80 State vs Thelbert Weaver 8 eet A Se et eet ee et A.W.D.W. The defendantx Tally Johnson ; guilty of AFFRAY. It is ontana and adsetena a the Court that defendant Tally Tohnson pay into Court $225.00 for the use and pay Hospital and Medical serves rendered Jahue Davis, and one-half of theThesdefn this action, i The defendant Juhue Davis pleads guilty of an AFFRAY. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant Juhue Vavis pay one-half of the cost of this action. €.C.W. and GAMPLING, The detendant pleads guilty of G.C.W. and Gambling. It is orderéd and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $25.00 andtcost for gambling and a fine of $50.00 for C.€.W. and cost of this action, as taxed by the Clerk. GAMBLING. Each of the defendants pleads guilty of Gambling as charged in bill of indictment. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that each of the defendants Ely Sutton, John Staton and Mason Jemes pay a fine of $25.00 each and one-fourthecost: eath in this action as taxed bt the Clerk. Retailing. The defendant John D,Hargy pleads guilty of receiving more than one quart of liquor. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant John D.Hardy pay e fine of $100.00 and cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk and give bona in sum of $200.00 for his appearance at each October Term of this Court for two years to show good behavior. LIQUOR FOR SALE. The defendant Clay Sloan through his Counsel pleads guilty of having liquor for sale. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defend- ant Clay Sloan be confined én Jail for a term of four months with leave to commissioners to work at the County Home for the sged and infirm, not to wear felon stripes. A.W.D.W. Judgment continued from August term, 1920 to October term, 1920 to show good behavior. Appear- ef and showed good behavior. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspended upon payment of all cost. A.W.D.W. « The defendant through his Counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of A.W.D.W. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $10.00 and cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk. October 20th, 20, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. TUESDAY, October 19th, 1920. C.C.W. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Walter Cowan pay a fine of $50.00 end cost of this action as taxed bt the Clerk, A.W.D.W. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Walter Cowan pay a fine of $10.00 and cost of this action &e ke taxed by the Clerk, LARCENY AND RECEIVING. Defendant pleads not guilty, The following jurors: C.A.McLelland, W.H.Dingler, I.R.Winecoff, L.H.White, C.E,Patterson, W.C.Austin, W.M.Clodfelter, W.P.Morton, J.P.Watts, J,B.Marshall, H.R.Mayes, and B.F.Bell, being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of Larceny. RETAILING. Defendant by his Counsel pleads guilty of retailing liquor. Prayer for judgment tontinued to next term of Court. 3200.00 bond required, LARCENY AND RECEIVING. The defendant Bynum Gibson pleads guilty to FORCEABLE TRESPASS. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspended upon payment of cost in this action as taxed bg the Clerk, and pay S.L.Tomlin for Automobile stolen. srable Court takes a recess until Wednesday Morning, SO cae aa a a Matra WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 20th, 1920, This Honorable Court convened Wednesday morning October 20th 1920, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. for the dispatch of business, No. 55, 56 & 58 State vs Alex Williamson Jim Hart Eugene Stockton No. 42 State vs Robert Rash Mersh Gatton No. 48 State vs Will Bass State vs Geo. Hagan No. 62 State vs Ely Sutton LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Each of the defendants plead not guilty. The following jurors: R.M. Jordon, J.A.Lippard, J.F.Waugh, J,B.Marshall, M.D.Tilly, W.F,Browning, T.D.Rimmer, J.W.Moore, W.A.Moore, J.W.McCoy, W.A.,Coy and J.E.,Westmoreland, being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendants Alex Williamson and Jim Hart guilty of Larceny and the defendant Eugene Stockton guilty of receiving property known to him to have been stolen. Having liquor contrary to law. The defendants pleads guilty to Forceable Trespass, Prayer for judgment continued for two years on good behavior and cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk. Retailing. Not a true bill. Retailing. N 2 true bill. Selling Liquor. Nol Pros With Leave. } : nN MHiurs Mi } This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, October 21st, 1920, at 9:30 o'clock, Nn nanan Wednesday, October 20th, 1920 7) THE SUPERIOR COURT: Iredell County, North Carolina. Hon. H.P.Lane, Judge Presiding: We, the Grand Jury for the October Term, 1920, beg leave to subm! the following report: We have passed upon all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made return of the same to the Court. We visited the Jail and found eight prisoners, three white, five colored. We found the jail well kept, clean and sanitery. We suggest that the wall berths be supported by chains instead of iron brackets as now uscd, as some of the brackets have been torn loose by prisoners and na to prise and break locks to gain freedom. We visited the different offices of the Court House and found everything well kept and records weel cared for. We recommend that this: floors of the vault in the Register of Deeds and Clerks offices be repeired snd that the walls of the officex of the Superintenent of Public Sbhools be calcimined and floors oiled. We recommend that the front lawn of the t Court Eouse be leveled and either sodded or sown in grass at an early date. COMMITTEE VISITS COUNTY HOME: We found 43 inmetes as follows: eight white men, 19 white women, eight colored men, 8 colored women. We found two epileptics, one white and one colored. We visited the various departments of the home and found it well kept and in good sanitary condition. We questioned the inmates 4s to their fare and they say they have plenty of good wholesome food and are well treated. We found about 700 1/2 gallon jars of nicely canned fruits of several’ different varieties. fe also isited the convict camp and found it in good condition. There sre three convicts, all colored. We want to congratulate the County Commissioners for having such efficient management for the County Home. Respectfully submit#éd, R.C,Morrison Foreman of Grand Jury. 4 This October 20th, 1920. It is ordered by the Court that the Clerk make a certified Copy of the above Grand Jury report for October Term, 1920 and file same with the County Commissioners of Iredell County. It is further ordered by th Court that the Grand Jury having completed their busines, can prove thes LY > udge Fresiding/. J attendance and be discharged, i IVWedaw May» ~ . Thursday Morning, October elst, 1920, This ¢ ) aunt nan 3 * 423 3 svt » ; ‘ rv ony ; 2 » , } ¢ ourt convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. Thuraday * D . Morning, October <lst, 1920, for the dispatch of business, 22 ac * 4s > 10 ed her +h . % i aacjucgec by the Court £hak by unanimous yote and consent ' the Bar that the Civil Calendar be continued except . for such orders and decrees that may come in the discretion of the Court, North Carolina,|} In the Superior Court 1 \AS “» Iredell County. } October Term, 1920, has presented 2 ~ - 5 : } + * - an open n vo pre law issued by the Supreme Court of North Carolina datec 4, it 25ti ] oO} é and whe 10% P at, the reo uest ~m + of D.L.Raymer, Attorney administered Constitution of North Carolina, thé id Wood Hayes Powell b dmitted and he is hereby admitte: practice of the profession of lar Courts of the St Carolina. It is further proceedings taken herein This October 21st, 1920. No. 34 State MURDER. Bycorder:o Vs 1 George Davis and Ho veorge Davis the High Sheriif, w Horace Waters represented by coun t the Court, thesdefendants, race Waters, in the custody of as brought into OpentCourt,being sel, Dorman Thompson and W.D. Turner, was placed upon their arrangement. Me Solicitor for the State, Hon. Hayden Clement, after having examined the State witnesses out of Court takes a Nol Pros as to Horace Waters, Further! the Solicitor tor the Stare, Hon. Hayden Clement, does or o vs 14 in the first degree, as “40 wee e| fact = et Aa StS OE Bt tia a oP Hh ‘ Sg bs) € + v tne pr ‘not guilty. Pending the selection of the jury the defendant used three pre-emptory challenges and tne State one. The following jurors, to-wit; F.H.Goodin, J.E. Westmoreland C.E.Patterson, I.W.McCoy, B.F.Bell, H.R. Mayes, W.R.Stout, T.D.Rimmer, W.H.Dingler, L.H.White, I.R.Winecoft, and W.F.Browning, were sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant, George Davis guilty of murder in the second degree and each juror answering for himself seys he finds the defendant George Davis guilty of murder in the second degree. ‘ This Honorabie Court takes recess until Friday morning, October 22nd, 1920, at 9:30 o'clock, A.-M. cS Mw. Xb Tudge Pr a. | This Honorable Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M. Friday Morning, October 22nd, 1920, for the dispatch of business. No. 47 State vs H.Hoover ee oe i) a4 4 Mm te 4 ct O BR pe ct M Oo © 3 nw cated ct 5 No. 436 State ) vs { H. L. Norman } j ) { } - No. 34 f“State } vs 4 George Davis 4 { } 4 j | NO. Stat vs Jim Carter 73 e No. 55 State vs Alex Williamson No. 56 State vs Jim Hart No. 17 State vs Tom Honeycutt —_= SS F< oe et et et Friday, October 22nd, 1920, mH x eto HH & AILING. efendant L.H.Hoover pleads guilty of retiling. ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant cost of this action as taxed by each Criminal term of court for behavior. Bond of $100. sufficient, Oo re I a s 4. Pct SD & fine of $100.00 and Clerk and appear at years and show good “y a oO as 4 . Larceny and Receiving. Plea not guilty. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of of Larceny and receiving from person. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant be contiined in common jail of Iredell County for term of FOUR months and assigned to commissioners of Rowan County to be worked on the Public roads of that County. Convicted of Felony, to wear stripes. Manufacturing Liquor. Detiendant’ pleads guilty of Manufacturing liquor. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of 12 months and assigned to the commissioners to work at the County Home for the Aged and Infirm. Sentence of I to begin Jan. 1st, 1921. ; MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the det endant be confined in thélcommon jail of Iredell County wathe leave to commissioners to work at County Home Farm for the aged and infirm as provided in Local pubige laws of 19134 for a term of two vears. BohvictetiuofnPeltinysbut nobidese; stripes. wear Abandonment. Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 being sworn and empannelled for their verdict. Affer the State producing {ts evidence, the Court orders a ur of not guiltye LARCENY. } It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant — 4 be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for 4 i term of two years with leave to the Commissioners to work} — at the County Home Farm for the Aged and Infirm as prvid by law. Cinvicted of Felony and may wear stripes. LARCENY. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the dete be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for term of two years with leave to County Commissioners work County Home Farm for aged and Infirm as provide law. Convicted of Felony amd may wear stripes. Selling Liquor. Nol Pros With Leave. No. 58 State vs Eugene Stockton No. 57 i State US Will Reed Alex Williamson | i | | i i i | } | | | i | ' | | 66 tate | vs { Clarence King i 4 4 } } | No. 59 | Stcte } | vs | Eugene Stockton 4} } } i 78 No. State vs Clem Grey No. 79 State vs Clem Grey No. 75 State vs Clay Sloan No. 27 State vs John Goodnight ‘years to show good behavior, pe ees te oe Pridey, October 22nd, 1920, RECEIVING PROPERTY KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN STOLEN. - is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant e confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of two years with leage to County Commissioners to work at County Home Farm for infirm as provided by Local Public laws of' Convicted Felony, to wear stripes, aged and 1913. of LARCENY AND RECEIVING, The defendant Will Reed pleads guil less than $20.00 value. t is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant W Reed be confined to the common jail of Iredell County for ea term of Six months with leave to County commissioners to work at County Home Farm for the Aged and Infirm as provided by Local Public Laws of 1913. Misdemeanor, not to wear stripes, of Larceny to The defendant pleads Nola Contemder, as to Larceny of less than $20.00 value. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspended as to Alex Williamson in this case. / LARCENY AND RECEIVING. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Clarence King be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of (18) Eighteen months with leave to County Commissioners to work on the County Home Farm for the aged and Infirm as provided by Local Public Laws of 1913. Convicted of Felony and to wear stripes. LIQUOR FOR SALE, Defendant pleads guilty of having more than one quart of liguor. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspended upon payment of cost as taxed by the Clerk in this action against defendant Eugene Stockton. CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Clem Grey be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of (60) Sixty days andr losve assigned to County CommissionerssoftCRonaén Gountyeto ber norked on pubticeRoadsvofothat County?) Misdemeanor, h6tcto wear stripes. WITH DEADLY WEAPON. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Clem Grey be confined in the Common jail of Iredell GQounty for a term of (60) Sixty days and assigned to the County Comaissioners of Rowen County to be worked on the Public Roads. of that County. The sentence to begin at the expiration of sengence in No. 78. ASSAULT HAVING MORE THAN ONE QUART OF LIQUOR. It is ordered and adjudge sentence heretcfore made of four months in jail be striken out and changed to a fine of $100.00 and ¢ of this action as taxed by the Clerk, and give bond | gum of $200.00 to appear at each term of court for thr Having Liquor Contrary to Lew, Nol Pros With Leave, Let the forfeiture be striken Outs. oo 4 by the Court that the former aS. Friday, October 22nd, 1920. No. 25 State ie : VS Khetetiing?!N63°> Pros With Léave. Jake. MorPison Will Poe ss No. % Stat Dp vLate Manufacturing Liquor. Alias Capias. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that Judgment Absolute be entered against Henry Davis, and his sureties Lula Davis and Buren Jurney for $100.00. is eY BY n d against J,J.Cagle, and his sureties Arch D, s ordered and adjudged by the Court that Judgment ntere ethel, J.M, Jones, and C.B,Pethel for $200.00 "dered and adjudged by the Court that the we be striken out as the State has taken a With Leave. ordered by the Court that in all Civil Actions the in which to file pleadings and that the thereafter to file answers. North Carolina, } Superior Court, Irede]l County.) October Term, 1920. Mr ¥0 Thomas Williams and others, J.F.Anderson ) -VS- ' FINAL JUDGMENT. { This cause coming on for hearing before the undersigned Judges at this term of the Court and it appearing that the parties have adjusted their @ifference: It is therefore considered and adjudged that the Padsintiffs Thomas Williams, Jennie Williams and others as appears in the record papers are owners of the land in controversy and entitled to immediate possession: That the cost be taxed against the plaintiff by Clerk. Henry P, Lane Judge Fresiding. By Consent: L.C.Caldwell ; or ain 8 D. Turner taby for Drt. Friday, October 22nd, 1920, North Carolina,|} Superior Court, Tredell Coungy. | h M-, 3 / ' Walter Morrow, by his next: } October Term, 1920. friend, Mrs. Tina B.Morrow. -Va- JUDGMENT, Mrs. W.L.Poston, Admx. of | W.L.Poston, deceased. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, | before His Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge, and it appearing that all of the matters | have been settled and adjusted and it agreed that the plaintiff recover sacs anette this causg,except the cost, which cost is to be taxed against | the defendants in said cause. It is therefore ordered that the plaintiff | pecover nothing but the cost in this case. Henry P, Lane Judge Presiding. | By Consent: | L.C.Caldwell | Attorney for Plaintiit. | H.P.Grier and W.D. Turner | Attorneys for defendant. j Ye 7% | North Carolina,} Superior Court, | Iredell Gounty.] October Term, 1920. | Mrs. Tina B.Morrow, Admx. | W.0. Morrow. 7S. JyUD GAB: Ff. | Mrs. W.L.Poston, Admx. of |W.L.Poston, deceased. | This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court | before His Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge, and it appearing that the parties have adjusted and settled the matters in controversy herein for the sum of | Eighteen Hundred Dollars, ($1800.00). It is therefore considered and |adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, the sum of $1800.00, /and tha cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Henry P. Lane dvudge Presiding. By Consent: L.C.Caldwell orney for ain H.P.Grier and W.D. Turner orneys for defendant. eS This Honorable Court takes a recess until Saturday Morning, October 23rd, 1920, at 9:30 A.M. ‘ In the Superior Court, October Term, 1920. October Term, 1920. | j North Carolina, In the Superior Court, IT IS THEREFORE, ordered thatthe motion for judgment for : | seed Geeta 4 the plaintiffs be granted; and it is further considered and adjudged thet the plaintiffs are the owners in fee and entitled to the possession F,F,Chambers -VS- 4 Lucy Chambers | This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, H.P.Lane, Judge and jury at the above term of Court and the jury having rendered re verdict set out in the record the defendant through her counsel moves that the verdict be set aside, which motion is granted. It is, therefore, considered ordered and adjudged that the verdict be and the same is hereby set aside and a new trial granted. Henry P.Lane vudge Fresiding. J.C.Clendenin et al } -VS- W.S.Clendenin } Motion by the defendant for a new trial for errors committed by the Judge in his charge to the jury, and for such errors as may be assigned in the case. for appeal to the Supreme Court. Motion, overruled. Exception by the defendant. The defendant appeals from the judgment of, the Court to the Supreme Court of North Carolina in open Court. ‘Notice of appeal waived. Bond in sum of $50.00 adjudged sufficient. By agreement of the counsel 60 days allowed the defendant to make out a case on appeal. 30 days thereafter, allowed the pleintiffs to file exceptions to the defendant's case on appeal or serve counter case. Henry P.Lane Judge Presiding. North Carolina,} Superior Court, Iredell County.) October Term, 1920. I.C.Clendenin, et al. | -VS- \ W.S.Clendenin. 0 This cause coming on for judgment at the above term of a? e ; Superior Court before His Honow, H.B.Lane, Judge pis iaire, upon’ ®o for judgment upon the verdict for plaintiffs, which motion wW 6 made @ of the land in controversy. IT IS FURTHER adjudged that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum of Four Hundred Dollars for rent of the land in controversy, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. No. 67 State vs Robert Spann Ezra Goodin |Né. 76 & 77 State vs | Gaston No. 65 | State vs | F.A. King | No. 49 | State vs | Parks Templeton | No. 50 ; State vs _L.W, Westmoreland State VS | Bill Keller |“aisy Sarnard ELD pera ee ee Henry P.Lane wuce es ng. Larceny and receiving. Continued by consent. L.& R. and A.W.D.W. Capias. Mfg. Liquor. Continued by consent. Mig. Liquor. Continued by consent. Forceable Trespass. Continued. FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY. Defendant Bill Keller calied and Capias. Capies as to Daisy Bernard. and failed. Judgement Nisic&Scfha Ménday’, January Sist, 1921, Monday? January, Sist, 1921, | | North Carolina, | Januery Term, 1921, cc 1 Iredell County, } r States ' vs | BGR, stds Capias, | Tom Pickens { Be it remembered that a Superior Cour t begun and held in and io. 2 for the County of Iredell on the 5th Monday before the lst Monday in ae y f { i vs Merch, 1921, the same being the 31st day of January, A,D, 1921, when ana ‘Tom Pickens | ME et L.&&R. Continued where His Honor, T.D.Bryson, Judge, is present and presiding, and Honorable! | 'No, 3 Hayden Clement, Solicitor, 'State is present and prosesuting in the name of the State, A.W.D.W, Aldas Capias, vs ‘David Gaither M,P, Alexander, | the High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and returned into open Court t i\No, 4 he names of the following good and lawful ‘State vs men to serve as Jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit: Too much Liquor, Alias Capias, Robert Woodward W.J,Lippara, J,A,Conner, R.M, Bagwell, ML, York, M.F,Sherril1, E,A,McAuley, Jes, Sherrill, R.L, Brantley, E.C.Er | No, § vin, J.L,Reid, T.C, Crouch, | State § ‘i vs § Mfg. Liquor, Alias Capias, ". T, Nicholson,H, D, Lackey, R,M, Anderson, A.M.Gabriel, C.A, Thomas, Lem Wallace, Will Bell f } W.E.Turner, F,D,Stonestreet, W.M,H orn, John W.Sherrill, W.C.Cavin, FA, | Cloaninger, I.I,Goodin, A.P, Sprinkle, ‘No, 6 W.C, Goodman, I,N, Alexander, WR, Hares, iState { For S00d behavior, vs @ Continued under former order, J.C, Joyner, T.M,Rickert, J.H, Campbell, R.L. Dingler, W.Ross Milis, RC, iE.J.Cain { | Gilleland, F.R,Mayes, and R.L. Wasson, i No, 7 The following named juroer were returned by the Sheriff, "could) — State { For §00d behavior, Appeared’ and showed 800d behavior, | vs { Continued under former order, not be found," to-wit; WL, Lippard, M.L.York, Jas, Sherrill, John w, Sherrill, ‘Fred Westmoreland ; | RoM, AndersonjsLem Wallace, I,N, Alexander, J.C, Joyner and R.C,Gilleland, | No, 8 The following named Jurors were excused for the term, to-wit: State § For Good Behavior, |_ VS { Continued under former order, R.M.Bagwell,and J.A.Conner, W1ll Perkins | The following €00d and lawful men were drawn and sworn as GRAND JURORS for the Term, to-wit: I,I,Goodman, W,Ross Mills, A,P,Sprinkle, W.C, State { | vs ;. Bey LO. R. Alies Capias, Goodman, H,D, Lackey, S.D, Dingler, E.C, Ervin, F,A,Cloaninger, F, D, Stonestreet, ‘Amos Gregory 5 T.C,.Crouch, A.M,Gabriel, R.L, Brantley, W.C, Cavin, T,M,Rickert, JL, Reid, ba i No, 12 W.E. Turner, M. F, Sher#412 and C.A, Thomas, ‘State { Having Liquor Contrary to Law, H |, ve f Alias Capias, W.Ross Mills was Sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. 'L.H. Souther $ E.V.Privette was Sworn as Officer of the Grand Jury. le iNO, 12 The following 00d and lawful men were sworn as Pettit Jurors ‘State { Vs j Having Liquor Contrary to Law, Alias Capias, | for the firdt week, to-wit; J.H, Campbell, F.R, Mayes, R,L.Wasson, E.R, em Barnhardt § | MeAuley, and W.M.Horn, together with the following Talés Jurors, to-wit: N bed Oo, 13 | L.R,Smith, W.A, Nicholson, A.A,Neili, J.W. McHargue, A.F, Johnson E,T, Ervin, — State { vs C.C,W. Continued, and E,W, Estes, and known as jury No, Le Bili Bernhardt No, 14 2, to-wit; H.L, Gilbert, A.G,Brown, C,H,Horn, GW State : d ) vs Renkin, A.B, Parker, J,A, Day, J.W.MeCoy, J.l,Hudson, J,E,Lippera, W,H? Mfg, Liquor, Alies Capias, Woodfin, R.G, Reynolds, Charles Goble and M.D, Tilley, No, 15 State vs Charles Goble No, 16 State vs Parney Stewart He; 17 State vs Boise Conner No. 18 State vs 7 7 Smith Noy: 29 State vs Tal Sherrill No, 20 State vs George Brown Tom Henderson No, 21 State vs Henry Davis No, 22 State vs Joe Cook No, 23 State vs N.A.Renegar \No, 24 State vs i Chas, Little iNo, 25 | State vs A.H, Baker No, 26 State \_ vs Neil Hellarda No, 27 State vs Mery Hays oe a — <> <x Soe — <x Aor oh Ht ot et ot ot OM pe <_< at at et ee pe pe ea pe ee Monday, Januery Slst, 1921, Selling Liquor, Continued, For Good behavior, Appeared and showed good behavior Continued under former order, . Resisting an Officer, Alias Caipas, Alias Capias, Too much Liquor, A.W.D.W. Alias Capias, Felony. Alias Capias, Liye Alias Capias, Retailing, Alias Capias, For good behavior, Continued under former order. C.C.W, Alias Capias, FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR, Appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, No. 28 State vs Gsither Foster RC, Miller No. 29 | State vs | Basil Alley | No, 30 | State vs | Floyd Press Edger Wooten No, 31 State | vs | Pred Crouse Ea Crist No, 32 | State vs 'Block Dalton | No, 35 State vs 'J.J,Cagle i\No, 34- State | VS |Lewis Moore \No. 35 | State vs | Thomas Owens No, 36 i State | vs ‘Clint Jordon | Salma Welborn No, 37 State vs: Parks Templeton, No, 39 State FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR, Appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, FORGERY, Continued under former order, vs L. H, Hoover No, 40 State . ve John D, Harkey wat eS MCT OE SS eet ee <n oe ee << <M nt et et eS et <> ee <—~ <x ae a A ed ee WO pee MONDAY, January 3lst, 1921, FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR, Continued under former order, C.C.Wi. Alias Capias, OPERATING AUTO RECKLESSLY, Alias Capias, Alias Capias, Hoise Breaking, Larceny and receiving, Alias Capias, ETAILING LIQUOR. Alias Capias, FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR. Appeared and showed good behavior. Continued under former onder, FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR, Appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY. Alias Capias. Mfg. Liquor, Nol Pros With Leave. FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR, Appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order. RETAILING, Continued under former order, ee “405 No, 41 State vs F,A.King No, 42 State vs Robert Spann Ezra Goodin No, 43 State vs Gaston Albea No, 44 State vs Gaston Albea No, 45 State vs Bill Keller Daisy Barnard No, 46 State vs James Wilson No, 75 State vs John A,Clark Joe Clark No, 76 State vs Elmore Gryder No. 77 State | ¥s Lynn Gryder | No, 78 State vs Lynn Gryder No, 79 State vs Henry Murdock Monday, Januery Slst, 1921. MFG, LIQUOR, Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Continued for defendants, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Alias BW. De Continued, FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY, Alias Capias, CRIME AGAINST NATURE, Alias Capias, A.W.D.W, Nol Pros With Leave as to Joe Clark, John A, Clark through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of and Affray. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be suspended upon payment of cost in this action as taxed by the Clerk, A.W.D.W, The defendant through his counsel waives finding of bill and pleads guilty of an AFFRAY, It is ordered and’ adjudged by the Court that defenday pay a fine of $20,00 and cost in this action as taxed by the Clerk, USING PROFANE LANGUAGE ON PUBLIC HIGHWAY, Nol Pros With Leave, A.W.D.W. Defendant through his counsel watves will amd pleads guilty of an AFFRAY, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of, $20.00 and cost of this action as taxed by the Clerke) A.W.D.W, Defendant through his counsel waiwés bill and pleads guilty of an AFFRAY, It is ordered Mme adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $25,00 and cost of this action as taxed by the Ol Noe 59 State vs Odell Parker No, 96 State vs Odell Parker No, 54 State vs Rome Morgan NO. 60 State vs Rome Morgan Lester Jones No, 97 State vs Rome Morgan ' No, 91 State vs John MeKins February lst, MONDAY, January 31st, 1921, A e W. Dd. W. Defendant pleads guilty.of Assault With Deadly Weapon, 0,7. 9, Defendant pleads guilty of Carrying Concealed Weapon, CO. 8, Defendant pleads guilty of Carrying Concealed Weapon, TOO MUCH LIQUOR, The defendants Rome Morgan and Lester Jones pleads guilty of TRANSPORTING WHISKEY, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, The defendant pleads not guilty. The following ,jurors beéng sworn and empannelled for their verdict, to-wit: RgL.Wasson, E,R.McAuley, L.R,Smith, W,A,Nicholson, ~W.McHargue, A.F.Johnson, T,E,Ervin, J.H,Campbell, F,R. Mayes, C.H,Brown, A,A.Neill, and E,W,Estes say they find the defendant Rome Morgan guilty of LARCENY AND RECEIVING, FORGERY, The defendant pleads not guilty. The following jurors being sworn and empannélled for their verdict, to-wit: H.L,Gilbert, A,G,Browm, C.H.Brown, G,W,Rankin, A.B, Parker, J.A.Day, J.W.McCoy, J.L,Hudson, J,E,Lippard, W,H, Woodfin, R.G.Reynolds, and M,D,Tilley say they find the defendant guilty of FORGERY as charged in bill of indictment, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wuesdayay Morning, i eit Fudge Presiding. 7 1921, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. spc ER RN TUESDAY, February lst, 1921, Tis Honorable Court convened at 9:00 o'clock, A.M, Tuesday Morning, February 1st, 1921, for the dispatch of business, No, 84 State vs Walter Shipp No, 95 State vs George Green j I Q ’ { ] I { { ) : " 0 f i f { ) \ ‘ I Q I { I ) ) j J ‘ I 4 ) { 4 | ; I 4 { 4 { { { J { j : ' ' ] 4 { | | 4 RAPE, Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior gam Court of Iredell County beginning January Slst, 1921, and sitting for the dispatch of bysiness, this the lst day of February, 1921, the Grand Jury of said Court in a body, 17 present, one having been excused by the Foreman of the Grand Jury (J.L.Rrid) returned into open Court the following will of indictment in words and figures as follows: INDICTMENT ----- RAPE, State of North Carolina,{ In the Superior Court, Iredell County. { January Term, A.D. 19°1, . The Jurors for the State upon their oaths present, that Walter Shipp late of the Cointy ofy Tredell on the 25th day of November A.D. 1920, with force and arms, at and in said County, not having the fear of GOD before his eyes, but being moved and seduced by the instigation of the devil, in and upon one Lula Caldwell in the peace of God and the State, then and there being, violently and feloniously did make an assault and her the said Walter Shipp forceably and against the will of her the said Lula Caldwell then’and there feloniously did ravish and carneally know, contrary to the Statutes in such case made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State, Clement, SOLICITOR, (Endorsed on the back by the following) No, 84 State Agsinst Walter Shipp INDICTMENT APE , Warrant WITNESSES, Lula Caldwell C.L, Mayhew Wood Elliott Laura Cornelius S,A.Fergerson J.M,Carr X J.L. Thomason Those marked X Sworn by the undersigned foreman, | and examined before the Grand Jury: and this bill found A TRUE BILL, W.Ross Mills Foreman of the Grand Jury. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Defendant through his counsell waives bill and pleads guilty, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant, George Green pay a fine of $25,00 and cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk, | | No. 84 | State | vs | Walter Shipp No, 99 Stated vs ., Jack Gentry James Williams No, 100 State vs Jack Gentry James Williams No, 101 State vs Jack Gentry James Williams No, 58 State vs Jack Gentry James Williams No, 67 State vs Frank Land No, 62 | State vs Roy McLelland | } ot A pee pe RE AE EO RE EE ee es nS pet nt ot et eet pe > et > pe pet Ot pee TUESDAY, February lst, 1921, RAPE, By order of the Court, the defendant, Walter in the Custody of the High Sheriff of eae. Gent, was brought into open Court and being represented by counsel, Zeb. V., Turlington, was placed upon his arraignment, ; The prisoner*being at therbar in the custody of M,P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, and through his counsel tenders a plea of ‘Guilty of an ASSAULT WITH AN“ATTEMPT° TO COMMIT RAPE. which the Solicitor, Hon, Hayden Clement for the State accepts, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant Walter Shipp be confined in the State Prison at Raleigh, N.C, for a term of (15) Fiftenn years. (Sentence beginning January 31st, 1921.) LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Each of the defendants plead guilty. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Each of the defendants plead guilty. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that Prayer for Judgment be continued, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Each of the Defendants plead guilty. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that Prayer for Judgement be continued, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Fach of the defendants plead not guilty. The following jurors being sworn and empannelled for their verdict, to-wit: d,H.Campbell, L.R.Smith, W,A,Nicholson, A.A, Neill, F.R.Mayes, R.L,Wasson, E,R,McAuley, .W. McHargus, A.F, Johnson, T.£.Ervin, W.M.Horn, and E,W,Estes say they find the defendants Jack Gentry and James Williams guilty of LARCENY AND RECEIVING as charged in the bill of indictment, It is ordered,sadjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant Jack Gentry be confined in the common Jail of Iredell County for a term of Four (4) years, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of said County during said period, and wear felon stripes. It is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant vames Williams be confined in the common Jail of Iredell County for’a term of Four (4) years, and assigned to work on’ the Public Roads of said County during said period, and wear felon stripes. LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant called and failed. Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Caplas, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Continued, No, 98 State vs Leonard Renegar Troy Mitchell No, 50 State vs Glenn Wood No, 66 State vs Lenwood Miller No. 70 State vs S,E. Torrence { { { | { j i : | j { I ! { } { ' ! t } } { { \ I 0 : { 0 t I { \ f 0 ' ’ I 4 : ) ( ‘ ) { I } { 4 TUESDAY3 February lst, 1921, | No, 50 | State vs Glenn Woods MANUFACTURING LIQUOR. Capias, MURDER, Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County beginning January 31st, 1921, and sitting for the dispatch of business, this the lst day of February, 1921, the Grand Jury of said Court in a body, 17 present, one (J.L.Reid, having been excused by the foreman of the Grand Jury returned into open Court the following bill of Indictment in words and figures as follows: INDICTMENT ----- MURDER, State of North Carolina,{ In the Superior Court, Iredell County, J January Term, A.D, 1921, The Jurors for the State upon their oath present, that Glenn Woods late of the County of Iredell on the 28 day of December A.D, 1920, with force and arms, at and in said county aforesaid, feloniously, wilfully. and of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder Charles Bailey contrary to the form of the Statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and digity of the State, Clement goolicitor, Endorsed on the back by the following words and figures, to-wit; No, 50 State Against Glenn Woods INDICTMENT MURDER WITNESSES : Mrs, Charlie “ailey (Hessie) Everett Watts, Roy Little Hattie Miller N Frank Smith ig John Mayes — Ed Miller S,A,Alexander Those marked X endorsed and sent by the Solicitor and sworn and examined by me, and No. 5 this bill found | os ee _ A TRUE BILL, “a C.C, Alexander ee W.Ross Mills Foreman Grand Jury. No, 57 State HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, : PT, Lyle: Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sei Fa Lay ae erey and Capias and Sci Fa Instanta, | Naxxae No, 83 State v8 HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, GvB. Gatther Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias and Instanta Sci Fa and apias, No, 82 State vs Frank Cornelius Walker Colvert — ee ee ee — ee ee — ee — ee — ee — ee — TUESDAY, February lst, 1921, MURDER, By order of the Court, the defendant, Glenn Woods in custody of M,P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, was brought into open Court and being represented by counsel, Messrs, Veb, V. Long and Buren Jurney was placed upon his arraignment, The prisoner, Glenn Woods, being at the bar in custody of M,P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, Hon, Hayden Clement, the Solicitor for the State and assisted by Hon, Hayden Burke, Attorney for Hessie Bailey, widow of Charlie Bailey, deceased after having exemined the State witnesses out of Court on the facts and truths, does not esk for murder in the First Degree as charged in the bill of indictment but for Murder in the Second Degree mR mansinugniten with privileges of the Court, Whereupon the prisoner, Glenn Woods through h msel Long & Jurney pleads ) IN COAAN guilty of MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, The Court accepts, It is ordered, adjudged,sednsidered and decreed by the Court that the prisoner, Glenn Woods be imprisoned in the State Penitentiary for a term of Eighteen (18) years at hard labor. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW. The defendant, S.A.Alexander pleads guilty of TRANSPORTING LIQUOR. UNLZWFULLY, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Nol Pros With Leave. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, The defendant, F,T.Lylerly pleads guilty of TRANSPORTING ‘LIQUOR UNLAWFULLY, REMOVING CROPS. Nol Pros With Leave. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, The defendants plead not guilty. Jury No. 2 being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendants not guilty. 41 No. 90 State vs W.S,.Bell No. 65 State vs Dewey Meadows pect pec OF TT et pect et ed pec pe I A pe pet CE eC eee IE HE PE -—<<—> <— ><> NN pk eee TUBSDAY, February, lst, 1921, RAPE, eh Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior Court| of Iredell County beginning January Slst, 1921, and sitting for the dispatch of business, this the lst day’ of Februery, 1921, the Grand Jury of said Court in a body, | 17 present, one, J,L.Reid having been excused by the Foreman of the Grand Jury, returned into open Court the following bill of indictment in words and figures as follows: INDICTMENT #«---- NAPE, State of North Carolina,{ In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ( January Term, A.D, 1921, The Jurors for the State upon their Oaths present, that W.S.Bell late of the county of Iredell on the 22 day of January, A.D, 1921, with force and arms, at and in said county, not having the fear of God before his eyes, but being moved and seduced by the instigation of the devil, in and upon one Margaret Stamper in the peace of God and the State, then and there being, violently and feloniously did make an assault and her the said Margaret Stamper forcibly and against the will of her the said “argaret Stamper then and there feloniously did) ravish and carnally know, contrary to the form ofthe Statute in such casesmade and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State, Clement » Solicitor, Endorsed on the back by the following words and figures, to-wit: No. 90 State Against 6ehe>- Bell INDICTMENT RAPE egver. Pros, WETNESSES X Mergeret Stamper Mrs, L.H, Bradshaw D,C, Lockmen R,L, Poplin X Will Goforth $e ‘ade Campbell Those marked x sworn by the undersigned, and examined before the Grand Jury; and this bill found A TRUE BILL, W.Ross Mills Foreman of the Grand Jury. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Defendant pleads no¥ guilty. The following jurors being sworn and empannélled for their verdict, to-wit: H,L,Gilbert, A.G,Browm, C,H,Horn, G,W.Rankin, A,B, Parker J.A,Day, J,.W.McCoy, J.L,Hudson, J.E,Lippard, W.H, Woodfin R,G,Reynolds and M,D,Tilley say they find the defendant Dewey Meadows not guilty. ~~ SS No, 48 State vs W, Y. Westmoreland No, 48 | State vs 'W.Y. Westmoreland PE OE pe PE I RE pe I A BE pe RE pe ped EE A pe a ee ce pe pret pet > ped ee A ee oe See <a << <—_ coal a — — J ON pee 413 Tuescay, February lst, 1921,. MURDER, Be it remembered that at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County beginning January 31st, 1921, and sitting for the dispatch of business, this the lst day of February, 1921, the Grand Jury of said Court in a body, 17 present. one, J,L,Reid having been excused by the Foremand of the Grand Jury, refirned into open Court the following bill of indictment in words end figures as follows; INDICTMENT ----- MURDER, Stete of North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County, | January Term, A.D, 1921. The Jurors for the State upon their oath present, phat W.Y,Westmoreland late of the county of Iredell on the 20th day of October A,D, 1920, with force and arms, at and in the county aforesaid, feloniously, willfully, and of his melice aforethought, did kill and murder J.H,Nance contrary to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State, } Clement eSsolicitor, Endorsed on the back by the following words and figures, to-wit: No, 48 State Against WY. Westmorelend INDICTMENT MURDER Pros, WITNESSES X Ivy Sims X A.S.Alley M.P.Alexander R,G, Reynolds Deputy John Gilbert , Those marked thus X endorsed and sent by the Solicitor and sworn and examined by me, and this bill found A TRUE BILL. W.Ross Mills Foreman Garnd Jury. MURDER, By order of the Court, the defendent, W.¥,Westmoreland, in the custody of M,P,Alexander the High Sherill of Iredell County, was brought into open Court, being represented by counsel,. Messrs. Zeb. V. Turlington and Hayden Burke, Attorneys, was placed upon his arraignment. The prisoner, W.¥.Westmoreland, being at the bar in the custody of M.P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County. The Solicitor for, the State, Hon, Heyden Clement, having called 4 the, to fs and hoid up his right hand, end having made known to him sewastaeseeesearon eerenresdieestson rn oi 414 _his counsel, this the lst, day of February, 1921, TUESDAY, Bebruary lst, 1921, (Continued from page 413) No, 48 State vs W.Y. Westmoreland MEKXER. that he stood charged by the name of W,.Y,Westmorelang in the indictment read to him of murder in the First | Degree. Whereupon the Prisoner plead Not Guilty and | for his trial placed himself upon God and his <= _ aon — << ee Country. \ The Prisoner being at the bay, it is ordered | by the Court that the High Sneriff of Iredell County } summons ONE HUNDRED (100) good and lawful men who } are free holders to appear at and be in attendance } upon the Court, Thursday Morning, February Srd, 1921, { at 10 o'clock, A.M. and not depart the Court without } leave, j The *risoner was then remanded to Prison { to await the orders of the Court, State of North carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 January Term, 1921. State VS W.Y.Westmoreland, TO M.P,ALEXANDER, HIGH SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY JOF_IREDELL, #- GREETINGS: It appesring to the Court in the trial of the above entitled action and under the bill of indictment returned in which said bill the defendant stands charged with the crime of murder in the first degree, to the end that a fair and impartial trial of the defendant upon such charge may be had, that a special venire of 100 men be summoned from the body of the county to act as jurors in the trial of the said action, so many of them as may be chosen, sworn and empannelled therein, Now, therefore, you are commanded that from the body of the county you summons loo men, special veniremen to be and appear at the courthouse in the city of Statesville on the Grd day of February, 192%, | at 10 o'clock, A.M,, to the end that so many of them as are necessary or accepted in the trial of the above entitled action, Herein fail not and of this process make due return. Done in open Gourt and in the presence of the defendant and uage holding ourt for the Le Fifteenth Judicial District. ae: This Honorable Court takés a recess until Wednesda - Mornt tien February 2nd, 1921, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M,, . udge *residing, This Honorable Court convened at 9:00 o'clock, A.M., Wednesday Morning, February 2nd, 1921, for the dispatch fo business, No, 51 | State vs | Hermen Gabriel No, 95 State vs V.W, Jenkins No. 88 State vs Tom Morrison No, 89 State vs Tom Morrison No. 61 State vs Toy Sharpe No, 69 State vs S.N, Shepherd | Wo, 81 ' | State vs Richard Clark | John Williams /Rufe Brown Sam Sanders Jule Stevenson No, 68 State vs Robert Carson No, 64 State Vs Will Overcash 4 | j j { j } =o -e <—~ ee eo OO eM Pe ee oOo =—_ = XN pee ~— ¥ et 415° WEDNESDAY, February 2nd, 1921. ASSAULT, The defendant pleads guilty of SIMPLE ASSAULT, which the Solicitor, Hon, Hayden Clement accepts for the State, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court th@e{the defendant pay a fine of $25.00 and cost of this action ASSAULT, The defendant pleads guilty of SIMPLE ASSAULT, which the Solicitor for the State, Hon. Hayden Clement accepts, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant V.W., Jenkins pay a fine of $26.00 and the cost in this action as taxed by the Clerk, HOUSE BREAKING? LARCENY AND RECEIVING, The defendant pleads guilty of FORCEABLE TRESPASS, which the Solicitor accepts dn behalf of the State, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued for TWO YEARS upon payment of cost of this action, Larceny and receiving. Nol Pros With Leave, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPONS, 4 The defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and cost of this action, EMBEZZLEMENT, The forfeiture heretofore ordered is hereby ordered striken out and the State takes a Nol Pros With “eave. LARCENY AND RECEIVING GOODS KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN STOBEN, The defendents, and each for himself plead guilty of FORCEABLE TRESPASS, It is ofidered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued to May Term, 1921 for further orders of the Court upon the payment of one-fifth of the cost in this action and giving bond in sum of $100, for his appearance at next term, as n Williams, wie Mo It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be suspended upon payment One-fifth cost each) a as to Richard Clark, Rufe Brown, Sam Sanders and 4 Jule Stevenson, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Continued for defendant. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAV, Continued for State. 7 WEDNESDAY, February 2nd, 1921, WEDNESDAY ~hly February end, 1921, | No, 49 | | | | State { MURDER, State of North Carolina,| In the Superior Cotrt, vs } Be it remembered that at this termuof the Superior Court : Hoyt Mercer | of Iredell County beginning January Slst, 1921, and | Iredell Céunty. { January Term, 1921, { sitting for’ the dispatch of business, this the 2nd day | | of Fébrueary, 1921, the Grand Jury of said Court ina | No. 49 a {| body, 17 present, one, J,L,Reid having been excused by 1] { the Foreman of the Grand Jury, returned into open . | State ee } Court the following bill of indictment in words and Ae figures as follows; vs VI | INDICTMENT ---- MURDER, eet Sereer Hi ) State of North Carolina,{ In the Superior Court, Se I ees pica itee Aw me Akins cde eeorecer haa) ) Iredell County. } Januery Term, 1921, TO M,P. ALEXANDER, HIGH SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY OF IREDELL, --- GREETING: i The Jurors for the State upon their oath present, a } that Hoyt Mercer late of the county of Iredell on the It appearing to the Court in the trial of the above entitled | ) Srd day of December A,D, 1920, with force and arms, at Hy } and in the county aforesaid, féloniously, willfully, action and under the bill of indictment returned in which said bill the it { and of his malice aforethought, did kill and murder : i } John Peal Rinehardt contrary to the form ofdthe Statute Befendant stands charged with the crime of MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, to i } in such case made and provided, and against the peace iE { and dignity of the State, ' the end that a fair and impartial trial of the defendant upon such charge ay \ Clement ZSolicitor,. I Endorsed on the Back = °° °° &«©«©&»©»™©»”” mgy be had, that a special venire of 50 men be summoned from the body of ai A TRUE BILL. | . the county to act as jurors in the trial of the said action, so many of if { W.Ross Mills { Foreman Grand Jury. them as be chosen, sworn and empannelled therein, Now, therefore, you are commanded that from the body of the fh No, 49 ; i| State MURDER, county you summons 50 men, special veniremen to be and appear at the } V S Hoyt Mercer courthouse in the city of Statesville on the Sth day of “ebruary, 1921, er By order of the Court, the defendant, Hoyt Mercer, in he custody of M.P,Alexander the High Sheriff of Iredell ‘ : ; ; . at 10 o'clock, A.M,, to the end that so many of them as are necessary or { County, was brought into open Court, being represented ’ . Lo. Ls accepted in the trial of the above entitled action, { by counsel, Hon. L,C.Calwell, was placed upon his - oy ga a mala A aap Herein fail not and of this process make due return, } arraignment, : ; oa Done in open Gourt and in the presence of the defendant and { The prisoner being at the bar in custody of the : a ie | his counsel, this the 2nd, day of february, 1921. } High Sheriff of Iredell County. The Solicitor for the LYyF we fra / KL-T p a State, Hon, Hayden ment, ft 1, the vuage holding Court for the i s » Hon yden Clement, having called uopn th Fifteenth Judicdal District, ) Prisoner to stand up and hold up his right hand, and } having made known to him that he stood charged by the ; si lo. { mame of Hoyt Mencer in the indictment read to him of State | ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Svs ) Nol Pros With Leave, ( MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, Whereupon the plead NOT Guy Karonski { { GUILTY and for his trial placed himself upon God and | es. ie his 6 wv. State I eesti | vs HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Continued for Deft. ' The Prisoner being at the bar, it is ordered by Srover L,Smith | } the Court the the High Sheriff of Iredell County No; 86 WT Te ‘ | State { summons FIFTY (50) good and lawful men who are free | vg HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Continued for Deft. { holders to appear at and be in afMéendance upon the Court) | George Smith 4 { Saturday Morning, February 5th, 1921, at 10 o'clock, A.M No. 87 | { and not depart the Court without leave | seate | BAVENG LIQUOR COMERAAE a | ; Pea | fontinaed os to trviaiians Called end failed | i The Prigo bee red Pharr { “efendant Everett ams Ca . ner was then remanded to prison to Bae. Everett Williams | Judgment Nisi Sed Fe and Capias, Forfeiture striken q { await the orders of the Court, { ous £f depenepes eeuere Dees within ty My? 2 {| adjournment of Court. “ 418 nee ea eames Ros 72 State vs Graham Alexander No; 72 State vs Graham Alexander No, 73 State vs Graham Alexander No. 96 State vs Odell ‘arker No. 59 State vs Odell Parker No, 62 State vs _ H.T, Hall No, 635 State 4... H.T, Hall No, 41 State vs F,A,King No, 38 State vs L.W. Westmoreland No, 47 State vs Grover L,Smith I~ i eet et OE RE OH OE et eet OS pee PEE HE eee OO A eee OO —~< ot ot Ot ee OS ee > ~~ — <<" et | Continued under former order, Wednesday} F epruary 2nd, 1921, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, pefendant pleads guilty. It is ordered adjudged and considered bysthe Court that defendant Graham Alexander be confined in the common’ jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county during said period without stripes, CARRYING CONSEALED WEAPON, Defendant pléads guilty. Itbis ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued in this case, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Graham Alexander be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR (4) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county during said period without stripes and that this sentence to take effect at the expiration of sentence in No, 71. CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered adjudged and considered by the Court that the defendant Odell Parker be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county during said period without SkEIBRE. stripes, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW. Nol Pros With Leave, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Defendant pleads guilty. a It is ordered adjudged and considered by the Court that the defendant H.T,Hall pay a fine of $50.00 and cost of this action, } MFG, LIQUOR, Forfeiture heretofore ordered striken out and continued for defendant, FORCEABLE TRESPASS, Continued, FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR, Noe 94 State vs | Hal Roseman | Frank Gant No, 54 State vs | Rome Morgan No. 97 State vs Rome Morgan No, 60 State vs Rome Morgan Lester Jones No, 91 State vs John MeKins et pen <— oH oO PEE PRE MEE OM pO pe CO 2 > AON pet SC et St OM pM ON OO Wesnesday, February 2nd, 1921, OPERATING AUTOMOBILE WITHOUT LIGHTS, Nol Pros With Leave, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, It is ordered by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant pleads guilty, It is ordered adjudged and considered by the Court that the defendnat Rome Morgan be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county during said period and to wear felon strives, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Each of the defendants pleads guilty of TRANSPORTING LIQUOR, It is ordered adjudged and considered by the Court that the defendant Rome Morgan be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (@) MONTHS, and asSigned to work on the public roads of said county during said period and to wear stripes and that this sentence to take effect at the expiration of sentence in No. 97. FORGERY, It is ordered adjudged and considered by the Court that the defendant John MceKins be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of NINE (9) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of seid county during said period and to wear felon stripes, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Thursday Morning, February 3rd, 1921, at 10 o'clock, A.M, 420) W . Y \ W No, 6 State vs Leste THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1921. Tis Honorable Court convened at 10 o'clock, A.M,, Thursday, Februery 3, 1921. ) MURDER, Plea:Not Guilty, In obedience to the order heretofore made in this ES TMORELAND { case, a Special Venire of One Hundred good and lawful men were summoned Lo appear at the Court House Thursday Morning, February 3, 1921, at 10 o'clock, A.M, The Prisoner being at the bar in the custody of M.P.Alexander, High Sheriff of Iredell County, whose prisoner he is, the following Jurors were drawn from the regular Jury and from the Special Venire, sworn and empanneled: - R,L, Wasson, W.M,Horn, W.M.Boggs, J.E,Murdock, J.i, Powers, T,F,Browning, G.W,Dry, C.W,Greene, J.A, Alexander, S.A,Padgett, W.R.Holmes and R.M, Hicks, 0 } Having Liquor Contrary to Law, { It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the r Jones ) defendant pay a fine of $25,00 and cost of this } action as taxed by the Clerk, ‘¢ bec entered against the plaintiffs and THURSDAY; FEBRUARY 3, 1921, North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County, February Term, 1921, Louisa Hayes 4 VS6 { Williem Campbell, J.W,Webb, { Lydia Webb, W.eB.Campbell, et all, This cause coming on to be herrd before His Honor, T.D.Bryson, Judge, and it appearing to the Court that all matters of diiference between the Plaintiff and the defendants, J.W.Webb and wife, +ydia “ebb, and the defendant, W.B.Campbell have been compromised and settled in full, the Plaintiff in open Court takes a non-suit as to the daid defendants, J.W.Webb, Lydia Webb, and W-5.Campbell, It is therefore ordered and adjudged tnat a judgment of non-suit that the plaintiffs pay the cost | of the action as to the defendants herein named, T.D,Bryson, Judge Presiding, Jacob Stewart Atty, for piff,. W.A,Bristol | Atty. For’ Defedts. _ J.W, Webby Court takes a recess until Friday February 4, 1921, This Honomable at 9:30, A.M, FRIDAY} FEBRUARY 4, 1921. This “Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, ,Friday, February 4. 1921. { MURDER, Plea: Not Guilty. { VERDICT; Guilty of Murder in the First Degree, W.¥.Westmoreland {| being the felony whereof he stands charged, North Carolina,} In the Syperior Court, Iredell County. | January +erm, 1921, Roy Cline by his next friend ‘ John A.Scott, Jr., | ' -VS- Sterling Mills, Incorporated. JUDGMENT, This cause coming on to be heard at the Januar Term 1921 of the Superior Court of Irédell County before his Honor, T.D,Bryson, Judge Presiding and a jury, and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the Jury has answered the issues submitted to them as follows; lst: Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint ? Ans; “Yes”, end: What damages, if any, has the plaintif sustained ? Ans; $246.00 ord: as the déféndanf paid the plaintiff the amount the plaintiff is entitled to recover in this action ? Ans: “Yes," IT IS THEREFORE, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover nothing further by this action than the amount heretofore paid and that the defendant pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, T. D. Bryson Judage Fresiding, APPROVED; John A,Scott, Jr, Attorney for plaintiff. Dorman Thompson Attorney for BHerendant, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1921, North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. February Term, 1921, M, L. Campbell { VS. } William Campbell, J. W,\ebb, { Lydia Webb, W.B.Campbell, et al. j 3 f a B D.Rry This cause coming on to be heard before His “omor, g@.D,Bryson, + + CoO? +ha 14 ++ a ‘ 4 ‘fer c Judge, and it appearing to the Court that all matters of difference wife Lydia 4 7 + . m 7} Webb, and the defendant W.5.Campbell, have been compromised and settled in full,the Pisintiff in open Court takes a non-suit as to the said defendants, J,W,Webb, Lydia ebb, and W.B, Campbell. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that a judgment of nonesuit be entered against the plaintiffs and that the plaintiffs pay the cost of the action as to the defendants herein named. T.D.Bryson Judge Presiding. Jacob Stewart’ e or e W.A,Bristol Att, for Dert, J.W.Webb and Wife, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Saturday Morning, 424 425 ATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1921. SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1921, No,.90, No, 49 VS, {| Tae Solicitor for the State, in open Court, | STATE 4 MURDER, Pleas Not Guilty State | RAPE, seagate Re io Reece a * W.S,Bell announces that he will not ask for a verdict for vs. } In obedience to the order heretofore made in this Rape, but for an assault with intent to commit Hoyt Mercer | ee eee ee ee <_< ee enEaEn qa S ia Vanin nt FR NAc 4 Case, a Special Venire of fifty good and lawful men were conn page | Rape, | Summoned to appear at the Court House Saturday Morning, February 5, 1921, at 10 o'clock, A.M, ; } } | The Prisoner being at the Bar in the custody of i M.P,Alexander, High Sheriff of +tredell County * » whose prisoner he is, the following Jurors were draw from the reguler Jury and from the Special Venire, sworn and , empannelled; It is ordered by the Yourt that the ‘Civil Calinder for May Term, | WM, I J. H be D Horn, ¢.+.Thomas, 4+4.Reavis,S.D,Chipley, J-li, Watts, 7 WP we. 3 i. ee ae i ink ae a) fete te 1921, be set to commence on Thursday of the First Week of the +erm, D.C. Cowan,P.R. Houpe,#.H.Sicmon,G.ll. Foard, J.P, Taylor D.D,Moose, and 7.4.1 1 ct > + UUSe At the close of the evidence, the defendant No.55 tendered a plea of Murder in the Second Yegree, which State { Having Liquor Contrary to Law, plea is accepted by the State, S.A. Alexander \ It is ordered by the Yourt that the de- It is ordered, adjudged, considered and decreed } fendant, S.A,Alexander, be confined in the common . by the Yourt that the Prisoner, Hoyt Mercer, be imprisoned Jail of Iredell County for a term of Six (6) Months | in the State Penitentiary for a Term of Twelve (12) and assigned to work on the public roards of Iredell | : i ; years, County during said term, Prisoner is not to wear Felon Stripes, No, 57 | State { Having Liquor Contrary to Law, No,74, VS, 4 It is ordered by the Yourt that the defendant - State { Transporting Liquor, F.T,Lyerly { F.T,Lyerly, be confined in the common jail of redell | : VS. { It is ordered by the Court that the defendant, County for a Term of Six (6) Months and assigned Richard Neely | Richard Neely, pay a Fine of ($25,00) Twenty-five & 00/100 to work on the Public loads of seid Younty during : Dollars and the costs of this action, ‘erm of Imprisonment, Prisoner not to wear Reizan Felon Stripes, | No,102 State i VS. : N.P.W.L. T.M, Wilcox ! SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, & ; STATE Upon the rend of the verdict of the Jury herein in the r ord, and before Liquor for Sale, V8, ‘udgment is pronounced the defendant, in ; open Court and through his Counsel, in the W.Y, Westmoreland presence of the Solicitor for the State and his associate counsel, moves to set aside the verdict and for anew trial for errors assigned and to be assisned, Motion overruled, Exceptions by the defendant, Defendant pleads Guilty of having Liquor’ contrary T.M, Wilcox to *law, Prayer.for Judgment Continued upon Payment of Costs, By consent thirty days allowed the Defendant to make out and serve case on ‘appeal, and thirty days thereafter allowed the Solicitor to serve counter case or file . exceptions, COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; , , Bond in sum of $100.00 adjudged » We, the Grand Jury for the February Term, 1921, beg leave to submit | sufiicient, the following report; We have passed upon all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made return | : 4 a TE The prisoner, W.Y. Westmoraland having of same to the Court | STATE +e 3 : renee nee : VS. been convicted of the crime of Murder in the We visited the Jail end found Seventeen prisoners ~- six white males | W.Y¥,Westmoreland first degree, the Court pronounced sentence : of death upon him as follows: red n an Y i t We £ J ry < a ; ten colored males d one colored female, We found the vail in very good "WY, Weatmore and, the jury chosen and npan 3 S ween 3 the State wi the ex of ea r 04 empannelled to pass between you and condition with he exception of a few broken Steam pipes, parts for which | upon your guilt or your innocence, have . + ned a verdict of Murder in the first : n order ad w mm % th 7} wom | returned a ver have been orde ed, and we recommend that they be installed upon arrival, degree, it now becomes my duty to impose tw oe er on : y | Such sentence as will carry into effect the Yi isited th tfer a f the Court Ho 1 z ; . e visite he different offices o ne Court Souse and found penalty provided by ae ” ey le W mA ON A + +4 PAA Tar + af { b erything well-kept, We recommend that the floors of the Vault in the Regge | It te urd, that you be taken t tate's Penitentiary in the City tnt ! u vilp ft £2 oo A on ; hence vO t State s ren : 1Sver's ukfter of Deeds and “lerk's offices be repaired, and we also recom ae of Raleigh, and there delivered into the + 7 wand wer itution a } ad + ay + + ~~” + i j cus today of the War aen of sucn insti ? moom be made to take care of the records in the there to remain in safe keeping until Wednesday the 6th day of April, A.D, 1921, and that upon the said 6th, day of Apri], 1921, COMMTITTRr vier COUNTY wnt | vd between the hours of 4 o'clock A.M, and 12 Se en a re o'clock M,,the warden of said penitentiary, a : ‘ his death, or absence, ¢ We ~wiatted tua C6 ter TF ; a or in case of his nh, » § #@ visited the Ounty Home in a body and found forty-eight inmates? deputy warden of said institution shall ‘ } ent death chamber — r ntyve f'n) } 377) * » Oo } j convey you to the perman nere were twenty-four white females; ten white males; seven colored _— provided within the walls of ee ce seven color ems and there cause to pass through your body males and seven colored fem les, é a current of electricity of sufficient W sited t} 1 H ‘ intensity to cause your death, and repeat #@ visited the various departments of the Home and found ‘it well-kept the same if necessary, until you are dead, , - ie a d may Almighty God have mercy upom you, and in good Sanitary condition, We questioned the inmates as to their fare ! = y — * + + ' qr. D. Bryson and they say that they have plenty of good wholesome food. and are well JUDGE HOLDING THE COURTS OF treated, We recommend that Jesse Wilson, an inmate of the County Home, ‘be’ THE 15th, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF N,c, moved to the State Hospital for the insane as we find that it is not safe to keep him there longer, Respectfully submitted, W.Ross Mills Foreman of “rand Jury, i | This February 3rd, 1921, This Honorable Court adjourns Sine Die, a mek i iheare seer AN x $i! oar ’ % aa Si Ort ee he 426 | and they say that they have plenty of good wholesome food. and are well SATURDAY, . FEBRUARY 5, 1921. No,535. State { Liquor for Sale, VS. } Defendant pleads Guilty of having Liquor’ contrary T,M, Wilcox { to*law, Prayer.for Judgment Continued upon Payment of Costs, | | [0 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA: E » We, the Grand Jury for the February Term, 1921, beg leave to submit the following report: We have passed upon all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made return| of same to the Court. We visited the Jail end found seventecn prisoners - six white males ten colored males and one colored female, We found the Jail in very good condition with the exception of a few broken steam pipes, parts for which | have been ordered, and we recommend that they be installed upon arrival? | We visited the different offices of the Court House and found | everything wellekept, We recommend that the floors of the Vault in the Rese ister's m&ftes of Deeds and Ylerk's offices be repaired, and we also recom mend that additional room be made to take care of the records in the Register of .Deeds Office, | COMMITTEE VISITS COUNTY HOME: We visited the County Home in a body and found forty-eight inmatese There were twenty-four white females; ten white males; seven colored males and seven colored femelos, We visited the various departments of the Home and found ‘it well-kept and in good sanitary condition, We questioned the inmates as to their fare ‘treated? We recommend that Jesse Wilson, an inmate of the County Home, ‘be’ pweves to the State Hospital for the insane as we find that it is not safe | to keep him there longer, ’ | Respectfully submitted, | W.Ross,Mills Foreman of frand JUPY « This February 3rd, 1921, aS SATURDAY, FESRUARY 5, 1921, } MURDER, | ; STATE Upon the rend of the verdict of { the Jury herein in the rdeord, and before WS. Judgment is pronounced the defendant, in {| open Court and through his Counsel, in the presence of the Solicitor for the State and his associate counsel, moves to set aside the verdict and for a»new trial for errors assigned and to be assigned, Motion overruled, Exceptions by the defendant, W. Y. Westmoreland - By consent thirty days allowed the Defendant to make out and serve case on -appeal, end thirty days thereafter allowed the Solicitor to serve counter case or file exceptions, Bond in sum of $100,00 adjudged sufficient, STATE ) The prisoner, W.Y. Westmoreland, having vs. { been convicted of the crime of Murder in the W.Y¥. Westmoreland { first degree, the Court pronounced sentence of death upon him as follows: "WY, Weatmorelend, the jury chosen and empannelled to pass between you and the State upon your guilt or your innocence, have returned a verdict of Murder in the first degree, it now becomes my duty to impose such sentence as will carry into effect the penalty provided by law. It ourt, that you be taken ‘hence to the State's Penitentiary in the City of Raleigh, and there delivered into the custody of the warden of such institution, there to remain in safe keeping until Wednesday the 6th day of April, A.D, 1921, and that upon the said 6th, day of April, 1921, between the hours of 4 o'clock A.M, and 12 o'clock M,,the warden of said penitentiary, -or in case of his desth, or absence, ¢@ deputy warden of said institution shall convey you to the permanent death chamber provided within the walls of penitentiary and there cause to pass through your body a current of electricity of sufficient intensity to cause your death, and repeat the same if necessary, until you are dead, and may Almighty God have mercy upom yous T, D, Bryson JUDGE HOLDING THE COURTS OF THE 15th, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF N,C,. This Honorable Court adjourns Sine Die. a A 428 ~—_ North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Tredell County.) 0,A, Dearman { vs. j J.B,Perks, and W.C, Hinshaw, { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by the Court | upon the forfeited complaint filed in the cause and it appearing to the Court from the complaint filed in this cause that said action is based upon a promisory note in the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars said note bearing date-oftthe Fourth day of May 1920 and drawing interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from May fourth 1920, until paid and it further appearing to the Court that no answer or demur has been filed in | this cause in the time provided and required by Statute in such cases made | | end provided; and it further appearing to the Court from the pleadings in this ceuse thet the defendants, J,B.,Parks and W,C,Hinshaw, are justly | indebted to the plaintiff 0.A,Dearman, in the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty | Dollers with interest on same from May fourth 1920 until paid at the rate | of six per cent per annum, | NOW THEREFORE, it is ordered adjudged and decreed by the court) that the plaintiff, 0,A,Dearmen, recover of the defendants, J,B, Parks and | W.C,Hinshaw, the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars with interest on the | seme from May 4th, 1920 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum | end for such other and further reltef as may be just and proper and for the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This March 2nd,, 1921, J. A,Hartness Clerk of Superior Court, orth “arolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | December 27th, 1918, | N,D,Tomlin, B,F,Russell, and others, | stockholders and creditors, j REPORT OF RECET VERS ? “vo { December 27th, 1918, Iredell Hardware Co, TO THE HONORABLE SUPERIOR COURT: The undersigned, Receivers of the Iredell Hardware Company, Respectfully file herewith their account since last report to the Court | of April 1, 1918; | To balance on hand April 1, 1918, $16 ,345,43 | fo collections since April 1, 1918, 3,181,94 } “quennenmmlanniaaa | Paid to creditors 50% dividend, Total € + a e e . © . . ; . * + . $19, 527037 | By 4% Commissions on $21,085.79 charges, $843.43 | By 4% Commissions on $20,274.70 disbursements 810,99 $1,654 ,42 $17,872.95 | By expense account, Stationery, stamps, j | stenographer, &c, $ 71.99 By R.B,McLeaughlin, Attorney, 500,00 571,99 $17,300.96 15,269.50 Balance for distribution to creditors, $ 4,031.66 We recommend that a dividend of fifteen (15) per cent be declared in favor of the creditors on proven claims, December 27th, 1918, Respectfully submitted, W.D, Turner & N.D, Tomlin Receiver ot the lredell Hardware Company. | North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | December 28th, 1918, N.D,. Tomlin, B.F,Russell, and others, Stockholders and Creditors, wise Tredell Hardware Company. This cause coming for further orders, upon the report of the Receivers of the defendant Company, and it appeabing from said report thet the Receivers have on hand $4,031.66 for distribution pro rata on the proven clains against the defendant, and they having recommended the declaration | i | of a further dividend of fifteen per cent on said claims of creditors, payable December 30th, 1918; It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that a further dividend of Fifteen per cent be, and the same is hereby, declared on the proven claims of creditors to be due and payable to said éreditors out of the fund aforesaid on or before the 30th day of December, 1915, This cause is retained for further orders, BY. F, Lo udge Resident and Presiding for the Fifteenth Judicial District, North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. } Januery Term, 1921, N,D, Tomlin and B,F,Russell and others,| -Vs- ORDER Iredell Hardware Company. This cause coming on to be heard upon the petition of Receivers for an order to sell the insolvent claims due said estate, and it appearing that the attached list of claims due the estate are insolvent and uncollectable; IT IS THEREFORE, considered, ordered and adjudged by thé Court that the Receivers of said estate be, and the are hereby ordered and —_ to sell the said list of insolvent claims at the Court House Door, after t days advertisement, at public outery to the highest bidder for cash, T, D, Byyson 6 es ng in e Judicial Dristrict, ‘ ‘a: | North Carolina, | Iredell County. } January Term, 1921, North Carolina,} In the Superior Court, Tredell County.) March 19th, 1921, N,D, Tomlin & W,D,Turner and others,} Stockholders and teeditors, { -VS- { FINAL ACCOUNT OF RECEIVERS. Iredell Hardware Company, j TO THE HONORABLE SUPERIOR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY; The undersigned Receivers of Iredell Hardware Company respectfully file herewith the final Account: Balance on hand April 1, 1918, $4,031.66 Collected on Sundry Accounts 799,79 Sale of Insolvent March 12, 1921, 24,00 $4,855.45 No, 1 Dividend to creditors $3,897.77 No. 2 By Clerk hire etc, 78.25 No. S Cost of proceedings 21,35 No, 4 J.A,Scott Jr. Ex, C,T.A. R.B, McLaughlin : . 115,00 No. 5 N.D,Tomlin & W,D, Turner Rec,.Bal on Coms, 536.53 No. 6 Retained by receivers per order Court on expense act. '? | 208.65 4,855.45 Respectfully submitted, W.D, Turner N. D, Tomlin Receiver itredell Hardware Company In the Superior Court, March 19th, 1921. N,D,Tomlin, B,F,Russell et al ) Stockholders and creditors, -VS- ! ) FINAL DECREE, t | Iredell Hardware Company. This cause coming on to be heard before the undersigned | Resident Judge of the 15th Judicial District of North Carolina, upon the FINAL REPORT of the Receivers intthe above entitled cause: IT IS, considered, ordered and adjudged that said Receivers pay to J.A.Scott jr, Executor c.t.a. of R.B,MeLaughlin, the sum of $115,000 the balance due him for expense and professional services for said estate; and that N.D,Tomlin and W,D,Turner, amy retain for their services the sum of five per cent on receipts and disbursements, and for whatever balance due may be in their hands after paying the above ashounts, the same may be retained by said Receivers on their expense account, B, F, Lon, e c1e8. 8 Ct. Judgment before Clerk, April 11lth., 1921, North Carolina, |} In the Superior Court, Iredell County.) Before the Clerk, In Re: The Korn Company -VS- " JUDGMENT Statesville Wood Products Company. 0 This cause coming on to be heard on this the tlth day of 1921, the same being the 2nd Monday of the month and being herad, | and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court from the records that | summons was issued in this cause on the 16th day of March, 1921, and | returnable April 4th, the lst Monday, and that a verified complaint was filed in the cause at the time said summons was issued and it further appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that a verified copy of said summons was served on the defendant at the time the original summons was served and it further appearing that this action is based on a promissory note, the terms of which note are set out in the complaint and the note Fty itself being attached to said compalint and it further appearing that no answer has been filed in said cause by the defendnats It is therefore found by the Court that the defendnat, Statesville Wood Products Company is indebted to the plaintiff, The Korm | Company, in the sum of $452.41, principal, and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent from the 9th day of September, 1920; It is therefomy ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendnat in the sum of $452.41 with interest thereon at the rage of six per cent per annum from September 9th., 1920, till paid and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, This the lith day of April, L9zZl, J.A, Hartness Clerk of Superior Court, Monday, May 23rd,, 1921, North ecm May Term 9 Treggz County. | vy » 1921, Be ,it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, on the 1lth Monday after the lst. Monday in March next, the same bing the 25rd day of May, A.D, 1921, when and where His Honor, T,D,Bryson, Judge presiding, is present and presiding, and Honorable, Hayden Clement, Solicitor r, is present and prsecuting in the name of the State, M.P,Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, is present and returned into open Court the names of the following good and law ul men to serve as jurors for the first week of this term, to-wit; H.Y.Mott, L.E,Reid, J,R, Johnson, J,S,Templeton, J.W.Cash, W.F,Pressly, D.D,Little, C,D,Ostwalt, J,F, Waugh, F.A,Sherrill, G.M. Proctor, N.G,Holmes, J.D,Harris, J,D,Patterson,Sr., A.E,Howard, C.B,Troutman, J.S, Maberry, D.O.Cowan, N.F.Owens, M,G,Slorn, E,M,Massey, A,J,Crater, L.H. bradshaw, J,W.,Milis, J.L.McLean, R,B,Flemming, L.S.Waugh, T.L.Stikeleather, J.R,Cash, J.B,Parks, John B, Reece, K.T.Nesbit, L.G.Brotherton, bnS. Waugh, J.F. Raymer, and Yoah Hussey, W.P.Mills. The following named jurors were returned by the Sheriff, "could not be found," to-wit: L.E,Reid, J.W,Cash, E.M.“assey and J,R. Cash, The following named jurors were excused for the term, to-wit; J.R, Johnson and L.G, Brotherton, The following good end lawful men were dfawn and sworn as | GRAND JURORS for the Term, to-wit: J,.B,Parks, R,B.Flemming, N.G,Holmes, | C.B. Troutman, J.D,Herris, W.F,Pressly, J,D,Patterson, Sr., A.J.Crater, | L.H.Bradshaw, A,¥,Howeard, D.D,Little, J.F,Waugh, Nosh Hussey, J.-L. McLean, | W.P.Mills, M.G.Sloan, G.M,Proctor and J.F.Raymer, 3.B,Parks was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. 0.B.4azenby was sworn as Officer of the Grand Jury. The following good and lawful men were sworn as Pettit Jurors for the first week, to-wit: 5, D, cabestt, T,.L,Stikeleather, J,.S.Templeton, H.Y.Mott, R.T,Nesbit, J.W.Mills, John B, Reece, D,C, Cowan, J.P. Waugh, N.F,Owens, | No, 1 State vs Tom Pickens No. @ State vs Tom Pickens No. State vs David Gaither No. 4 State vs Robert Woordward Noy 6 State vs E. J. Sain No, 7 State vs Fred Westmoreland No. 8 State vs Will Perkins No. 9 State vs Amos Gregory No, '10 State vs L.H.Souther NOs ia State vs Bill Barnhardt No, 12 State vs | Bill Barnhardt No, 13 | State | Vs | Charles Goble No, 14 State vs Charles Goble << ao at —— <> >_< > eee HO oso —< <> ot <> pet <> <S seot et > << eo Ht ee SS ee Larceny and Receiving. Not Pros With Leave, Larceny and Receiving, Nol Pros With Leave, A.W. DW, Alias Capias Too Much Liquor, Alias Capias NAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, To show good behavior Nol Pros With Leave, FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY, Appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, Ba We De He Continued, House breaking Larceny and Receiving Nol Pros With Leave, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Alias Capias HAVING LIQUOR CONTARARY TO LAW, Alias Capias. C,C.W. Continued, Mfg, Liquor, Nol Pros With Leave, SELLING LIQUoR,,. Nol Pros With Leave, No. 15 State vs Parney Stewart i No. 16 tate vs Boise Vonner | No, 17 State | vs i7,T, Smith No. 18 State vs Tal Sherrill ‘Np. 19 State vs George Brown . | Tom Henerson i No, 20 | State 'Henry “avis No,21 State | ve | Joe Cook No, 22 State vs _ N.A.“enegar \No, 23 | State | V8 |A.H, Baker No, 24 State \Neil Hellara No, 25 State Ys Mary Heys No, 26 State qvs aither Foster R,C, Miller Monday, May 23rd,, 1921, ne Liquor, Continued under former order, ESISTING AN OFFICER ‘ | RESISTING AN OFFICER, Alias Capias, ¥ i TOO MT TTOTIOR A ~ : LO00 MUCH LIQUOR, Alias Capias, X A.W.D.W, Alias Capias ~ « I | ) FELONY, Nol Pros With Leave, | { LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Nol Pros With Leave, { { RETAILING, Alias Capias, § MFG, LIQUOR, Continued under former order, 4 { HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAii, Wontinued under 4 former order, i § C.C.W. Continued under former order, 4 { FORGERY, 4 It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the { defendant Mary “ays be discharged, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, ; Continued under former order, Not 27 State vs Basil Alley No, 28 State vs Floyd Press Edgar Wooten No, 29 State vs Fred Crouse Ed Crist No, 30 State vs Block Dalton No, 31 State vs J.J, Cagle No. 32 State vs Lewis Moore No. 33d State vs Thomas Owens No, 35 State vs John D, Harkey. No. 36 State vs L.H. Hoover No,42 State vs Jessie Wilson No, 43 State vs No, 46 State, vs Linwood Miller W.Y. Westmoreland ’ << at et eek A ee — o <= x <— ot a, om eo <tr <— ot tO pet et a A —> >< 2 pet SE i Monday, May 23rd., 1921. C.C.W. Nol Pros With Leave, OPERATING AUTOMOBILE RECKLESSLY, Alias Capias as to Floyd Press, Trial as to Edgar Wooten, STORE BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Alias Capias. STORE BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Alias Copias, RETAILING LIQUOR, Alias Capias, $500, bond required, LIQUOR FOR SALE, Appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, LIQUOR FOR SALE, Appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, RETAILING LIQUOR. Continued under former order, RETAILING LIQUOR, ices end showed good behavior, Continued under former order, CRIME AGAINST NATURE. Nol Pros With Leave, MURDER, Guilty of murder in firet sear ee Det h< appealed to os dae A Court eC Gi at -srot honda poe Sie ect oe HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Defendant pleads guilty to charge in bill of indictment, It 4s ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued for two years payment of cost and his good behavior, No. 47 State vs Frank Land No, 49 State vs S,E, Torrence No, 52 State vs Fred Pharr Everett Williams No, 54 State vs Claud Allison No, 55 State _vs 4eonard Renegar Troy Mitchell No e 5 6 State vs Deck Lynch No, 57 State vs Will Bass No. 58 State vs Will Bass No. 69 State vs Hertsell Harwell This Honorable Court takes a recess until Tuesday morning, May 24th, 1921, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M, << eet <a << ek eS St et eo <—St ot ect <tr et RE EE pe ee eo 137° Monday, May 23rd,, 1921, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Alias Caplas, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Defendant pleads guilty of having whiskey for sale end receiving unlawfully quantity. HAVING LIQUOR FOR SALR, Defendant Everett Williams pleads receiving unlawful liquor, Defendant Fred Pharr pleads not guilty, Jury No. 1 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they ‘find the defendant Fréda@' Pherr guilty of receiving and ‘teetkneeel liquor, guilty of RETAILING LIQUOR, Defendant called and failed, ) Judgement Nisi Sei Fa and Capias, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, | ' Trial as to Troy Mitchell ’ Alias Capias as to Leonard Renegar, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, Alias Capias, SEELING LIQUOR. Alias Captas SELLING LIQUOR. Ajias Capias, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, Defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of manufacturing liquor, Tis Honorable Court convened at 9:00 o'clock, A.M,, Tuesday May 24th., 1921, for the dispatch of bisiness, No, 45 State vs Will Overcash No. 74 State vs John Tolen Nos. 86 & 87 State vs John Hudspeth No e 59 State vs J.C, Dellinger No, 1035 State vs J.C,Sharpe No. 48 State vs Robert Carson No, 97 State vs Lomax Sadler No, 89 State vs William Elsworth No, 60 State VS Sam Holmes Se EO EM Ct peed : 4 | Tuesday, May 24th., 1921. RBG@EIVING AND SELLING LIQUOR, Defendant pleads noy guilty. Jury No, 2 after being sworn and empannelled for ther verdict say they find the defendant Will Overcash not guilty. | | | i i HOUSE BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant pleads guilty to charge in bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court thet the defendant John Colen be confined in the common jail of'| Iredell County for a term of FOUR MONTHS with leave to County Commissioners to work on the public roads of said county during said period without stripes, STORE BREAKING LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant pleads noy guilty. Jury No. 1 after being | sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find | the defendant guilty of the: charge in each bill of | indictment. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of receiving unlawful amount of whiskey. OPERATING SLOT MACHINE, Defendant pleads guilty of operating Slot Machine on the public road near the Catawba river unlawfully. LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant pleads nof$ guilty. Jury No. 1 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of larceny and receiving. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued upon payment of cost. CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Defendant pleads guilty of carrying concealed weapon. HOUSEBREAKING? , LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No, 2 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant William Elsworth guilty of House Breaking Larceny and Receiving as charged in the bill of indictment, RAPE, Continued by consent, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wodnesday Morning, May 25th., 1921, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M, ; This Honorable Court convened at 9:00 o'clock, A Wednesday, May 25th,, 1921, eM. , Wednesday, May 25th, 1921, for the dispatch of btsiness, Noe 90 State vs William Elsworth No. 62 State vs Fred Johnson No, 63 State vs H,G,Milsaps No, 84 State vs Charles Hedrick No. 70 State vs Julius Owens No. 80 State vs | Prank Bridges No. 88 State vs Bob Benson No, 75 State 7S Early Moose No, 28 State vs Ed Wooten No, 79 State vs Henry Adame CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, a. pleads guilty of carrying concealed HAVING LIQUOR FOR SALI \LE, The defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, The defendant throvgh his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty of receiving and transporting liquor. ¢ DYNIMITING FISH IN CATAWBA RIVER, The defendant pleads not guilty. Jury no. 1 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdick say they find the defendant guilty of dynimiting fish in the Catawba river as charged in the bille of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the eT pey a fine of $100.00 and cost of this action and Waiconfined Thtrty (50) days in the common jail of Iredell County, and assigned to work on the publie roads of said county for said period without stripes, ABANDONMENT, The defendant pleads guilty to charges in bill of indictment, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, The defendant pleads guilty of FORCEABLE TRESPASS, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the pay a fine of $15,00 and cost of this action, DISTURBING RELIGIOUS WORSHIP, The defendant pleads not guilty. Verdict by the Court not guilty. CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Defendant called and failed, and Capias, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa OPERATING AUTOMOBILE RECKLESSLY, The defendant pleads guilty of operating Automobile recklessly on high way while intoxicated with whiskey,’ HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, The defendant pleads guilty of having liquor contrary to law, No. 82 State vs Renkin Cloaninger. No, 81 State vs James Smith No. 85 State vs Authur Brooks, Alias Clyde Hampton No, 37 Troy Mitchell No; 110 State vs H,A. Wooten No, 34 State vs L,W,. Westmoreland No, 100 State vs Judge Graham No. 67 State vs Frank Myers Wednesday, May 25th., 1921. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, The defendent pleads guilty of unlawfully receiving liquor. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, The defendant pleads guilty of receiving more than one quart of liquor. TRANSPORTING LIQUOR, The defendant pleads guilty of transporting liquor contrary to law, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, Continued by consent, Bond of $750.00 sufficient, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi and Capias, MANUGACTURING LIQUOR, Bond of $5000.00 required to be justified, FORCEABLE TRESPASS, The defendant pleads guilty of forceable trespass, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer | for judgment be suspended upon payment of cost in this action, DISPOSING OF MORTGAGE PROPERTY, Defendant pleads guilty of disposing of mortgage property. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be suspended upon payment of cost in this action. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, The defendant pleads guilty of assault with deadly weapon as charged in bill of indictment, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that. the defendant pay a fine of $25.00 and cost of this action as taxed by the Clerk, This Honorable Court takes recess until Thursday morning, May 26th, 1921, at 9:00 o'clock, A.M. Fed sath Juage Fresiding, | Walter Brandon Thursday, Mag 26th, 1921, This Honorable Court convened at 9:00 o'clock, A.M, Thursday May 26th, 1921, for the dispatch of business, No,90 State vs William Elsworth No, 62 State vs Fred Johnson No. 65 State vs H.C, Millsaps Nos. 92 & 93 State vs Walter Brandon : I ) { | ) i | : ) I J { ‘ ' ) " { ' ' { ; } \ Nae 93 State vs —Oo mm | No. 71 State vs | W.V. Ireland i No, 112 State vs Tom Poteat Joe MeRary No, 113 State — vs Flake Holland “HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Defendant plead guilty of carrying concealed weapon, Prayer for judgment continued, LIQUOR FOR SALE, Defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty. ? RECEIVING AND PRASNPORTING LIQUOR, Defendant through his counsel waives bill and pleads guilty. ASSAULT ON FEMALE, Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No. heing sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty ef assault on female as charged in bill of indictment, in each of two indictments, + It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Walter Brandon be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Eighteen (18) months, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county during said period without felon stripes in No. 92, The defendant moves to set aside the verdict on account of new evidence and for error assigned and to be asSigned; judgment as appears in the records accepted, Defendant in open court gives notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, Notice accepted by the State; Further notice waived, Appaekibond for the sum of $100.00 fixed; Appearance bond for the sum of $500.00 justified, By consent sixty days allowed appelant to make service in case on appeal to Supreme Court and sixty days thereafter allowed the cee State to file a. or counter CASe. wi aaa , | af ASSAULT ON FEMALE, It is ordered and adjudged bysathe Court that prayer for judgment is tontinued, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR. Defendant called and failed, Judgement Nisi Sei Fa and Capias, Justified in sum of $100C, required, | HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Continued for defendants, Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sei Fa and Capias, Forfeiture striken out if bond renewed in 10 days, $1000, justified bond required, | | No, 50 State vs Grover L, Smith No, 51 State vs George Smith No<¢ 322 State vs Will Deaton No, 1035 State vs J.C, Sharpe No. 66 State vs John Emerson No, 44 State vs Roy MeLellend No, 61 State vs W.V.Fox No. 65 State vs Joe Eccles No, 83 State vs Dora Clark No, 53 State vs W.S.Bell No, 77 State vs Jas. H, Church — <> oor i ~— <> he <> ot oe OM <p Thursday, May 26th, 1921. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Plead guilty of transporting liquor. Prayer for judgment continued upon payment of cost in this action, Further to appear at each criminal term for two years and show good behavior, bond $500, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Defendant pleads guilty of receiving and transporting liquor, Prayer for judgment continued upon payment of cost in this action, OPERATING SLOT MACHINE, ° Defendant pleads guilty. Prayer for judgment continued upon payment of cost. Eurthsxrxteftyxiz RiwExhbandxarxKRsO® B cxmkxNayxikEx y Spry Bt ee aA OPERATING SLOT MACHINE, ft Prayer for judgment continued until next term of Court on payment of cost and defendant giving bond| in sum of $250, to appear and show good behavior, And further to cease operating his lunch and refreshment stand on Sundays. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Defendant pleads guilty. It is ordered and adjudged that defendant pay a fine of $25.00 and cost of | this action, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Continued for defendant, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW. Continued for defendant, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Continued for Deft. FELONY, Nol Pros With Leave, RAPE, Defendnat pleads guilty of assault on female he being over 18 years of age. Prayer for judgment suspended upon payment of cost, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR. Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi’ Set and Yapias, $1000, justified bond required, Mee No. 73 State vs ‘ Everett Lyttle, No. 76 State vs P,D, Cline No, 116 State vs P,D, Cline No. 78 State vs Elam Houpe No, 91 State vs Walter Brandon No, 96 State vs Lilly May Fleming No, 105 State vs Elem Houpe No, 101 State vs Cherles Marlow j } | { ‘ | ’ ) ' ‘ 4 I ’ ‘ | ) { : ; { { 0 ; } Q <p He EN <a <a St RO a at Ot et eS ee SS A ee A eee Thursday, May 26th., 1921, INDECENCY, In the call of this case for trial it was by the Solicitor for the State that the tenmaae being incarsenated in the common jail of Iredell County was unable on account of want of mental capacity to intelligently plead to the charge preferred against him or defend same, Upon such information the Court ordered a jury to be empannelled, based on the issue of the present sanity’ or unsanity of the said defendant Everette Lyttle, After the introduction of evidence the jury returned the verdict deferred,the defendant Everette Lyttle to be incapacitated on account of the want of mental capacity to intelligently plead to the charge preferred against him or to defend Same, Whereupon and in consideration of such verdict so returned the Court orders that the defendant, Everette Lyttle, be transferred to the Criminal Insane Asylum of the State of North Raxvmtin Carolina and to remain until such time that he be discharged according to law, such case made and provided, and the High Sheriff of the County of Iredell is hereby directed to superintend such transfer, ; 2. hegees Judge fresiding, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Defendant plead’ guilty. Judgement suspended upon payment of cost. CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Yefendant plead guilty. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and cost of this action, RAPE, Defendant being omer 18 years of age pleads guilty of an assault on female. Judgment suspended upon payment of cost in this action. PROSTRITUTION, Continued for defendant, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Plead guilty. The defendant being under 16 yeers’ of age and a female child, she is turned over to the probation officer, ‘ CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Nol Pros With Leave, ABANDONMENT. The defendant pleads No Lo Contender, Judgment continued upon payment of cost, Bond in sum of $300,00 for his appearance at each criminal term five years for his good behavior and that he has complied condition of written agreement to support his wife and children, No, 50 State vs Grover L, Smith No. 51 State vs George Smith Nog 2:2 State vs Will Deaton No, 1035 State vs J.C, Sharpe No. 66 State vs John Emerson No, 44 State vs Roy McLelland No. 61 State vs W.V. Fox No, 65 State vs Joe Eccles No, 83 State vs Dora Clark No, 535 State vs W.S,.Bell No, 77 State vs Jas, H. Church Gi . rex ect ay Thursdey, May 26th, 1921. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW. Plead guilty of transporting liquor, Prayer for judgment continued upon payment of cost in this action, Further to appear at each criminal term’ for two years and show good behavior, bond $500, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Defendant pleads guilty of receiving and transporting liquor. Prayer for judgment continued upon payment of cost in this action, OPERATING SLOT MACHINE, ° Defendant pleads guilty. Prayer for judgment continued upon payment of cost. Euxrthexrxieftyxts Kiwexhbonkx BXHPRERYXELXNAYXKEKrMs XTRRX OPERATING SLOT MACHINE, ; Prayer for judgment continued until next term of Court on payment of cost and defendant giving bond) in sum of $250, to appear and show good behavior, And further to cease operating his lunch and refreshment stand on Sundays. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Defendant pleads guilty, It is ordered and adjudged that defendant pay a fine of $25.00 and cost of | this action. LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Continued for defendant, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW. Continued for defendant. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON. Continued for FELONY, Nol Pros With Leave, RAPE. Defendnat pleads guilty of assault on female he being over 18 years of age. Prayer for judgment suspended upon payment of cost, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, F, | Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi’ Sei “®@ and Yapias, $1000, justified bond required. No. 735 State vs ’ Everett Lyttle, No. 76 State vs P, D, Cline No, 116 State vs P,D, Cline No. 78 State vs Elam Houpe No, 91 State vs Walter Brandon No, 96 State vs Lilly May Fleming No, 105 State vs Elem Houpe No, 101 State vs Cherles Marlow Thursday, May 26th., 1921, INDECENCY, In the call of this case for trial it was intimated by the Solicitor for the State that the defendant being incarsenated in the common jail of Iredell County was unable on account of want of mental capacity to intelligently plead to the charge preferred against him or defend same. Upon such information the Court ordered a jury to be empannelled, based on the issue of the present sanity’ or unsanity of the said defendant Everette Lyttle, After the introduction of evidence the jury returned the verdict deferred,the defendant Everette Lyttle to be incapacitated on account of the want of mental capacity to intelligently plead to the charge vreferred against him or to defend same, Whereupon and in consideration of such verdict so returned the Court orders that the defendant, Everette Lyttle, be transferred to the Criminal Insane Asylum of the State of North Saxmtin Carolina and to remain until such time that he be discharged according to law, such case made and provided, and the High Sheriff of the County of Iredell is hereby directed to superintend such transfer, 2. Berson Judge frresiding. ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, Defendant plead guilty. Judgement suspended upon payment of cost. CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Yefendant plead guilty. It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and cost of this action, RAPE, Defendant being amer'i8 years of age pleads guilty of an assault on female, Judgment suspended upon payment of cost in this action. PROSTRITUTION, Continued for defendant, ASSAULT WITH’ DEADLY WEAPON, Plead guilty. The defendant being under 16 years’ of age and a female child, she is turned over to the probation officer, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON. Nol Pros With Leave, ABANDONMENT. The defendant pleads No Lo Contender, Judgment continued upon payment of cost, Bond in sum of $300.00 for his appearance at each criminal term five years for his good behavior and that he has complied condition of written agreement to support his wife and children, Ho. 38 State vs Robert Spann Ezra Goodin No. 6 State vs Will Bell No. 41 State vs Grover No. 43 State vs WY. Westmoreland No. 47 State vs Frank Land No. 48 State vs Robert Carson No, 54 State vs Claud Allison No, 64 State vs Hugh Lee Howard No. 72 State vs Herman Gabriel No, 75 State vs Early Moose No, 94 State vs John Wallace pee > pee > pet pee net <> vee Thursday, May 26th., 1921. LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Each of the defendants’ called and failed, Judgment Nisi Sci Fa and Capias, Bill heretofore returned charging larceny and receiving changed to charge of Forceable Trespass; the defendants and each of them through their counsel, said counsel having authority to represent them waive their presence in Court and enter a plea of guilty of the cahrge of forceable tresspassing; Prayer for judgment continued for payment of cost, MFG, LIQUOR, Alias Capias, T@ SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Prayer continued for two years upon deft. giving bond in sum of $800, to appear at each term and show good behavior, MURDER, Guilty of murder in first degree. Deft. appealed to Supreme Court, Supreme Court held that there is no error, Appeal dismissed, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Nol Pros With Leave, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay only one-half the cost in this cases TO SHOW GOOD’ BEHAVIOR, Alias Capias, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Nol Pros With Leave. RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS, Nol Pros With Leave. CARREENG CONCEALED WEAPON, Defefdant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Set Fa and Capias, ? CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, Nol Pros With Leaves j i i | { i \ | | | No, 95 State vs Howell McHenry Noe 84 State vs Charles Hedrick | No. 98 | State | vs | Ed Shoemaker 1 | j } | | j } | No. 102 | State vs | Charles Hicks | No, 105 | State vs | Elam Houpe | No. 104 | State vs | T.M,Wilcox } i | No. 106 | State vs Roy Nicholson Cooper Holland No, 107 | State vs Espie Dishmen | No, 108 State vs | Eli Privette No, 109 State vs Ed Gaither No, 110 State vs H. A, Wooten Thursday, May 26th., 1921, CARRYING CONCEALED WEA! Nol Pros With Leave, DYNAMITING FISH, Verdick guilty. It os ordered and adjudged by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and cost of this action and Thirty days in the common jail of Iredell Vounty and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period’ without felon stripes, Sentence to go in effect Nov. lst. 1921, on defendant giving bond in sum of $800.00 for his appearance to Sheriff of Iredell County and abide the judgment of the Court at said date, MFG, LIQUOR, Continued for deft. on $500.00 / Capias, C.€.W. Nol Pros With Leave, It is ordered that deft, be discharged, HAVING’ LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Capias, Liquor, Not a true bill. i , } LIQUOR FOR SALE. ,Capjas. { g/oo% ‘s i] DISTURBING SCHOOL ENTERTAINMENT, * Capias, a MFG, LIQUOR, Capias, Bond of $5000, required, es ie No, 112 State vs Tom Poteat Joe McRary No, 1135 State vs . Flake Holland No,114 State vs Espie Dishmen No, 225 State vs Ed Shoemaker NOg LT State vs Flake Holland No, 28 State vs Edger Vooten No, 89 State vs William Elsworth No e 90 State vs William Elsworth No, 49 State vs ‘ S.E, Torrence No. 59 State vs J.C, Dellinger << aot SS — o > et <a pet een et ee ofS oS Oe Thursday, May 26th, 1921. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW Continued for defendants LIQUOR FOR SALE. conten CATON Oa Me-/ 17 Capias, Capias, LIQUOR FOR SALE, kapnias, Deft, called, and failed, Judgment Nisi,Sci Fayand | Capias. forfectic - 7 (beh. autof borce/ Arrterveol ~ 10 Fepe f/ Friday, May 27th., 1927. OPERATING AUTO WHILE INTOXICATED, Prayer for judgment continued for two years upon payment of cost and giving bgnd in sum of $200.00 to show good shart cane: a Law STORE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant William’ Elsworth be confined in the State Prison atrRaléégh, oN, Covforyanberm of THREE YEARS at hard labor, - ~ anne : 7 . ’ Y embrace gpl vrimeg danger fos LE) Ye CARRYING’ CONCEALED WEABON, ; Prayer for judgment continued, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, It 1s ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant S,E,Torrence be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of Six (6) months and assigned to work on the public roads of said, county for said period without felon stripes. RECEIVING UNLAWFUL AMOUNT OF WHISKEY, It is ordered and afjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell county for a term of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, and assigne to work on the public roads‘of said county for sat perior witout felon stripes, No. 62 State vs ‘ Fred Johnson No. 63 State vs H.G,Millsaps No, 69 State vs Hartsell Harwell No. 79 State vs Henry Adams No. 80 State vs Frank Bridges Wo. 82 State vs James Smith No, 82 State vs | Rankin Cloaninger No « 85 State vs Clyde Hampton, No, 86 & 87 State vs John Hudspeth No. 97 State . ¥8 Amthur Brooks,Alias << ot et ee a ee ee EE et EE OM RE ES peg ot pet <> pct SN CE Se ee ee Friday, May 27th., 1921, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the comion jail of Iredell County for a term of TEN (10) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said periord without felon siripes, RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING LIQUOR UNLAWFULLY, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said periord witout felon stripes, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in the comfon jail of Iredell County for a term of TWO YEARS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period without 8elon stripes, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, a It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period without felon stripes, > GUILTY OF FORCEABLE TRESPASS, Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $15,00 and cost of this actia RECRIVING MORE THAN ONE QUART.OF WHISKEY AT ONE TIME, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that prayer for judgment be continued for two years upon payment of cost in this action, UNLAWFULLY RECEIVING WHISKEY, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $50,00 and cost of this action and give bond of $200, for his appearance at each May term for two years to show good behavior. TRANSPORTIN LIQUOR, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public woads of said county said period without felon stripes, STORE BREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Prayer for judgment continued in each case, GARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $50.00 and cost of this ac yt + rae Dane ak No. 99 State vs Jonas F, Johnson J.S, Taylor No. 52 State vs Fred Pharr Evefette Williams No, 70 State vs Julius Owens No, 46 State vs Linwood Miller No, 535 State vs w.S,.Bell No. 38 State vs. Robert Spann Ezra Goodin ee et <> pct <> pret vet peed ES PEE pe 1 pect pee mt eet pt pe { { ' i : J opt eo le et = pot et Friday, May 27th., 1921. UNLAWFULLY RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING LIQUOR, It is ordered and adjudged by defendant Jonas F, Johnson be jail of Iredell County for a term of MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of ' Iredell County for said period without felon stripes, Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant J,S,Taylor be confined: in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of FOUR (4) MONTHS Ge assigned to work on the public roads of said the Court that the confined. in the common (30) ounty for said period without felon stripes, | RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING UNLAWFULLY QUANTITY LIQUOR, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Fred Pharr be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, snd assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period without felon stripes, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Everette Williams be confined in the common’ jail of Iredell County MONTHS, for a term of Ten (10) and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period without felon stripes, ABANDONMENT, tfis dered and adjudged by the Court that the 4° in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period without felon stripes. HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Defendent called and failed, and Yapias, RAPE, Defendant called end failed, end Capias, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendants called and failed, Fa and Capias, Judgment Nisi Sei Fa Judgment Nisi Sei Fa Judgment Nisi Sel | 449 May Term, 1921, ) ti F IREDELL COUNTY: Judge T,D,Bryson, Judge Presiding: We, the Grand-jurors for may Term, 1921 the following report: . We have pagsed upon all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made return of the same to the Court, : We visited the jail and find tén white prisoners and five colored prisoners (four men and one woman). The jail seems to be properly kept, but we would recommend that the inside walls be repaired by coat of paint or something, the same being in bad condition. We further recommend that a new heating plant be installed in the jail, We visited the County Home by committee and found Forty-one inmates; seven white males end twenty white females; seven colored males and seven colored females. The buildings and grounds are in fine: shape and the fields are covered with wheat and clover, and we are pleasod to say that this is a model institution and fast becoming self sustaining. We questioned the inmates as to their fare and they say they are well fed with good and wholesome food and well treated by the keeper, A conmittee of our body investigated the several,;offices of the Court house and find the records properly kept as best they could judge, but recommend a new heating plant be installed; that the floor of the vaults in the Register of Deeds and Clerk of Court's offices be repaired without delay, also the floor in the South hall be repaired, We further recommend that all stair-ways be Cleaned and put in good condition, they now being in an unsamitary condition, We further recommend that some shelves now in the Register of Deed's office be removed and installed in the Sheriff's office when the new furniture arrives or the Kecister of Deed's office, ; We would respectfully submit that the quarters now furnished for the garnd-jurors ere inadequate for need of ventilation and room, We visited the chain gang by committee and find it in an unsanitary condition, We find Ten colored prisoners and Two white prisoners, We find that the tents are worn out and too small; hat the bed clothing needs replacing with new and that more attention should be given to the disinfecting of the premises, The stock and tools all seemed to be properly taken care of and good work being done by the gang. We understood that a new tent had been ordered for the chain gang, which will imppove conditions to some extent, And further we recommend that some means be provided by which the prisoners may be snabled to undress at night instead of sleeping with their work clothes on, which would make it possible to keep the beds in much better condition, as well as being so much more humane for the prisoners, We do not wish to censure Mr, Feimster, who we feel is doing about the best he can under the present conditions, We further recommend thet some kind of a screen compartment be furnished in which to keep the provisions of the camp. beg leaves to submit Respectfully submitted, J.B. Parks Foreman of the Grand-jury. This “ey e6th., 1921. (SECOND WEEK) fonday, May 30th., 1921. This Honorable Court convened at 10:00 o'clock, A.M, May 30th,, 1921, for the dispatch of business, His Honor, T.D,Bryson, Judge Fresiding,| M.P. Alexander, the High Sheriff of Iredell County, North Caroline returned into open Court the names of the following good and lewful men to serve as jurors for the SECOND WEEK of this term, to-wit: F,S,Stroud,.J.Houston, Brown, R.E, Hill, C,H. Knox, R,4.Cloyd, W,C,Moore, Z.B,Brown, D.C,Reece, WM, Jacks, T, A, Xennedy, A.D.Boges, H.H, Sigman, A.E,Brown, J,A,Johnson, A,L.Wagner, W.S.Brawley, R.C.Lee, T.M,Walksp, T,L.Barnard, G,W,Rankin, J,J,Litton, P,M,Godfrey, ©.P,Galliher and J.P. Malus J.A,Johnson and T,M,Walker were excused on account of infirmities, No, 10 J.L.Sherrill vs Continued by consent B.M.Wilhelm No. 17 : Bert Ray Conner Plaintiff comes into open Court end takes S, a voluntary Non-Suit. It is ordered by the Mooresville Cotton Mills Court that cost be taxed against plaintiff. Nos Se D In Re: Gyrus “acons, aveat,. Continued by consent No, 37, 38, 59 & 40 Henkel-Craig Live Stock vs Jas, C. Davis, Director Continued by consent General of Railroads. (Sou. Ry Co.) No, 45 Statesville Lumber Co, VS Continued by consent, R,M, Current No, 54 Sarah Chambers vs Continued for defendant C,H.Chambers No, 59 C,E.Lichlenhein, surviving | partner of Pitt Barnu & Co.( vs { Continued by consent J.K.Morrison Grocery & { Produce Co, { No,69 Carles Houser ‘vs Jas, C,Davis, Director Generul Railroads, (Sou. Ry. Co.) Continued by consent No, 70 Statesville Lumber Co, j } Continued by consent, Thomas Eidson SECOND WEEK) Term, 1921, No, 14 we Merchants & Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N.C. vs. D,A,Beem and L,A.Beam On suggestion of defendants A,W.Colson is & necessary party to plaintiffs in this action, It is ordered by the Court that A.7,Colson come into Court and make himsdf party plaintiff to this action. If he refuses to be meade party plaintiff then the defendants are to issue summons making him party plaintiff to this action. Case continued, Ce PE I <> wee No. 21 Mon ~ duet. J.P. Little This case coming on for trial and trial VS begun, After taking of the evidence it is E,T.Fesmire ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff has no cause of action, It is further ord d and adjudged by the Court that the plain f is non-suited for cause of action and that the pleinti&£ pay the cost as taxed by the Clerk, Pet I HOM pe pe a OM No. o5 G,C,Lapish h 1se coming on for trial and after iS camining plaintiff defendant moves to Jas, ©, Davis, Director sul General of Railroads, (Sou. Ry. Co.) No, 36-1/2 The Board of Missions of Freedman of Presbyterian urch U,S7zA. e VS. W.W, Murdock | No. 57 | O.I,Jordan, et al VS. Continued by consent. | W.A,Campbell, et al No. 95 Exekiel MceDaniels VS. Continued, | Bernice MeDaniels | No, 47 | 8.P.Frazier NON«SUIT. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T.D,Bryson, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff’ in said action takes a voluntary non-suit, It is, Therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non- suited, and pay the cost of this action, VS St ee ee re No, 1 James Armstrong VS i j NON-SUIT,. ! Emma Arns trong ‘ coming on to be heard before His Honor, T,D,Bryson, Judge Preddding, sta at appearing to the Court that the plaintiff in ce action takes a volunt non-suit, ns It is, snexatore; ordered end adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, (SECOND WEEK) May Term, 1921. No. 4 Jessie Brawley wes | NON-SUITED Lola Brawley es This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T. D,Bryson, Judge “residing, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff takes a voluntary non-suit,. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, ’ — “4 0%. OD I.B.Glover, et al vs. i Western Union Telegraph Co.} NON-SUITED, This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T,D,.Bryson Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff takes a voluntary non-stit. It is, Therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action. a No; 6 R,R.Munufacturing Co. VS% S.R.Brown & Son Continued, Jessie B, Van Camp, et al yea ms VDe P.B.“ennedy and H,C.Hunter Continued, st ot ot No, 90. W.P.MeLain, et al TA VDe Miller-McLain Supply Co. Continued, re Noy al Statesville Lumber Co { VS { WNON-SUITED, J..Horton This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T.D,Bryson, Judge Presiding, and’ it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff takes a voluntary non-suit. Sie os It is, Therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, Nos Lb J.C,Clendenin, et al V8. W.S. Clendenin Continued, ry | No. 16 P.B. Kennedy J | H.C, Hunter VS Continued, No; 354 G.M.Simpson VS. Fred H, Conger { Continued | } | 453 (SECOND WEEK) May Term, 1921, No. 18 Southern Fruit Co, VS J.K.Morrison Grocery & Produce Co, NON-SUITED Pt peg HN This cause coming on to be heard Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the a voluntary non-suit, It is, therefore, ordered and adjudred 1 fore, aq and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost — before His Honor, T.D,Bryson, Court that the plaintiff takes uv of this action, . No, 19 Boyce Lumber Co, f VS. ( NON-SUITED, J, Burette Houpe 4 ‘ This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T,D.Bryson, Judge tresiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff takes a voluntary non-suit, It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by thé Court-that the plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, No, 20 Della Walker { VS. | NON-SUITED, Harvey Lee Borders f This cause coming on to be heard b Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court a voluntery non-suit, s Honor, T.D.Bryson, he plaintiff takes It is, theréfore, ordered and adjudged by thé Court that the plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, No. 26 Z.VeBrown, Admr. of S.R. { Brown, deceased ' VS. { NON*SUITED Harris’Miller and Maggie ) Miller, } This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T.D.Bryson, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff takes a voluntary non-suit, ; It is, theréofre, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost in this action. No, 31 Bob Benson VS 4 NON-SUITED, Clara Benson j Thais cause coming on to be heerd before the His Honor, 7T,D, Bey | Bryson, Hudge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff | takes a voluntary non-suit. ~ It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the Plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, No, 43 Statesville Lumber Co, { V8. ( Continued, C.H. Knox : No, 48 C,H, Chambers | Vs, } Continued Sarah Sloan, Alias Chambers| , me (SECOND WEEK) May Term, 1921. No. 49 T, L, Tomlin } Death of defendant suggested, VS. § It is, therefore ordered and adjudged by the W. Frank Sipes § Court that the palintiff be allowed to ) amend complaint and make new parties } defendants, No. 51 John H, Thompson | VS. } Continued, H.P,Carter, et al { No, 535 ; Flynt Stevens Auto Co. 4 VS, { NON-SUITED, C.V.Elam ) This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T,D,Bryson, | Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff takes a valuntery nan-suit,. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, No. 65 : Kincaid & Parger WS J,A,Gibson Continued, on No, 87 Henkel-Craig Live Stock Co, Vs. G.W,.Catdwel],T.E.Lippard, and L,.L.Lippard, Continued, ox <> ot ot Nos Ve A.J.Keller, et al vs De Charles Hicks, et al Continued, — ot et No, 74 Z Statesville“Lumber Co, Ve T.M,Stikeleather Comtinued, No. 76 Curtis Barnard { vs. { NON-SUWITED. Daisey Barnard j Thisc cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T.D.Bryson, Judge Presiding, and’ it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff takes | a voluntary non-suit,. It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the | plaintiff be non-suited, and pay the cost of this action, ‘No, 78 Royal Motor Co. : vs. { Continued, Carl Stimpson, et al \ , Nol 80 W.T,Webdster and W,J,Matheson} VS. -} Continued, J.5,.Setzer \ | Tharpe and J,M. Deaton (SECOND WEEK) May Term, 1921, No, 81 E, M. Yount VSe { NON-SUITED, M.E.Bowles } This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T.D,Bryson Judge Presiding, and appearing to the Court that the palintif? takes i , voluntary non-suit, It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be nonesuited, and pay the cost of this action, No. 89 Grady Hines and John Fox VS. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co, ntinued, oO n uU mt pe No, 92 C.B.Stewart vs. Miller Mfg. Co., et al ae | inyed, + is ct 3 ee eK Q No. 99 L.C, Caldwell VS. dno. A, McLean, Jas, E, <p OE et | No. 104 Carolina Motor Co. VS. N. 3 Long Ke ee - Continued, —_< ot oe : sca No, 106 | Statesville Lumber Co, { | Statesville Lumber Co, | William DuBose VS6 } Continued, R.L.Chureh and C.S,Grant | No, 107 VS. Continued, Ed Nicholson, et al et pet No, 108 Veldon Kerr VS. Continued, —— No. 91 A,T,Rinehardt Admr. of |’ It is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff JeP,Rinehardt, Dec'd | be allowed 30 days to amend complaint, and VS. { that defendant be allowed 30 days in which to Mooresville Cotton Mills | file amended answer. hn. Co, M.L, Campbell Death of the aan tobe Ceceeepiteed VS. It is, sherefore, orde ed and adjudged by William Campbell, J.W.Webb} the Court that the plaintiff be allowed to lydia Webb, W.B, Campbt11 amend complaint amd make new parties et al | plaintiffs, SR. “455 a | | ee a / 09 {oF May Term, 1921, Louisa Hayes ve William Campbell, J.W.Webb, Lydiay Webb, W.B, Campbell, et al No. 41 S C.V.Henkel and Ples “arber trading and doing busines under the nage and style, of “enkel & Barber Ss Jas. C,~avis, Director General of Railroads, (Sou, RY. CO.) NOs: 208. rth Carolina Vee u ~ nf SP Be a a rt List Did the plaintif complaint ? i \ oO x * end: t LV + plair 7,4 more than ten successive year titled action as alle ANG 8 r ‘“ SI ¢ J the plaintiff beer years prior Ino- / 0 . North Carolina, Iredell County. BE. E. Fulbright ) ) VS ) ) ) Fulbright. P. Jd. (SECOND WEEK ) | to the comn In the Superior Court, Death of one of Serengiatp et It is, therefore, ordered bnd adjudged by the Courv that the plaintiff be allowed to amend complaint and the defendants allowed | to amend answer and @efendants allowed to make new parties defendants, This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T,D,Bryson, Judge Presiding, and it | appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs | and defendants have agreed to arbitrate their difference, It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court thet the plaintiffs and defendants be allowed to arbritrate thetr | Pe 4 Hifferences out of Court, rn Superior Court, eens thks ae May mm LeeLs oe aig rere) de . e defendant intermarry as allesed in the anda separate iencemnent of the Carolina ibove entit@léd@ action ? ‘erm 1921. the comp Pb ™~eno. 35. North Ca Tredell To +n ¢ Qn Ja o Je lst: { . LY +} a a ANTE. ALi ¢ } ‘ae injury ? Te A ANS: oo fay Term, 19 : aa ; This cau cond on to ea { m . “An T T J VSON dce Pr Aaa r, Ve . ry SON, Jd 1 PP} 3 a the 3 6 f011 4 4 Vil a tw A a & * . ’ ad - 1 +s Tic + ry7 + >be of 4 pi u laint ? WIE Va ere: ‘4 . 2nd. av f { pl 4 + Y ¢ ar 4 , Si) ve >i r to - : on = 4 ; 4 * 4 action as alleg . L . lor bls pa e 4 . 4 4 y orade £ ( pl 1 € re FOr | yn n + ro 0} u ) A ) ) c <7 Aline YES e T + ; 4 oF ( 1 4 4} 5 4 ( + } et we A pl o Jud rolina, ( T 4 uper Co int e ( rT Ter L nis} ) z \ } / \ } / ) / Davi ’ Director Gene f Raillroa .) Was the plai Tres i Lj re yV a 7 omplaint ? Did the plaintifé by his No. What damage, if any, is tl $1300.00 (SECOND WEEK) own negli ence contrib he plaintiff entitled recover Lo OV 457 / tt ; a 458 SreAtyD wow (S 4 »O1 LJ WS) 1921. Ma 1 ) ay Ler, ~ Myr 37 ~ North Carolina Ir a? the Superior Court. Tredell County May Term, 1921. = 4 -- Yu v é . od ek A aes ee ee f Railroad <2 dharn Pritlroac \ I.0 D164éM EBoN \ A ‘ be ate & Nae 4 iA i Jo . + d s > } ¢ m oOo a Th 4 cause oming or to be heart io I V er 1921, O 4 ~ . ‘ - I - 4 Pes : oe os m r Mmnare Tis ¢ n yr er irt , Tr 1 yw ++ ef re Hi onor, Ts . ry: _ Judge - : + %r54 ‘ Presi nda iurv be eard ind it appearing to the Court that I Li 59 A uJ ae - 3 4 ) 14 ce heret Pore peer take 7th thi LSé is t Lhe Sco ther Raile- yay Compa aid iniwury avin be sustained while the operation of the vA DSi TIALLY 9 ALC sel fs J Visio, M i trai of cCoithern Railway Company was under the control of the ited $ ’ ’ 5 + stat -ailroad Admi tration, an: t appearing further to the Court that ' , . ; Sea 4 eee } : re the | 1b BU t¢ SS: 34 10 : . mae ot cue EY Aaa Oks a a me } Qe Ist: the plaintifff injured by the negligence o t ( anda . Tiare tr Fhe soOmnlaint ? Ae u A § > - / i . ate, <7. Liisde Lvwe end: Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his : $47 “+9 OWN zn juUPrys ANd ¢ NOe q ; is the plaintif nti 4d to recover ord: jhat damage, Ys. 3 p tiff entitled vo mec n > ~ ~ . Rr + » - yd. ge WY e@ VU v4 s t, ref yy considaere< ordered LY J aj id rE d by the Court . 4 o ae . 7 4 4 oe yp 2? ADC that the plaint re yV » OF tn defe qaant JLTECVLO!I eneral [oe ilroacd I > ” / ~ a ” t - o \* “ * * 1 aaa “ . +7 yk the u ) 1,500.00 a a: % costs of this action to be taxed by the Clers | . “poe | G COUP e al tT r { i abarce ry mn | | Pe Judge Pre iding. Qn al fT ADTe ae, we LAT ia TO a | See es DIRECTOR OF RAILROADS Vat tu we Defendant moves to set aside errors assigned and to be assigned. the verdict and have a new trial fol Motion over-ruled and exception by ~ “3 Ie Ton + ~— o a “a 7 defendant. Judgment as appears i the record er saioned ac n o8 3 ~AP . assi@? 6a anc ¥ ) 45S & e anit appeal to Supreme Court; tic ‘cepted and furth. nti s bi ef int yd 4 y + . o 2+ ‘ + ’ Tt ee V ‘ inn a] ; . \- ‘ - . ( i. f ( t mA ets , + ’ allowed sixt Lea oO a ¢ VE L)) ] T ye rt. + ¥ Sn44 £4 ar oe ? z The plai Lud = dive Si Vy £ t erea ft { i LC ¢ yt, ) OY rt Yr A he : = case thereto. . . 4 -" ) e cal 74 T 4 d: . wh. an WO Ofe North Carolina ) erior Courte \ } / Tredell County \ yn 1 1 oe v ‘ ° ‘ 4 t ~ 4 : $3 09 \ ir Ran} y \ Al A 4 1 ide de de @ / \ } / Te ‘ - ho } © ‘ ae t 1, re ia \ wy f Ay, GC1C lant. J First. Pe the plaintif the defendant marric Liege? CS } C f ps AttS ay ANwe i. S CO t 4 e nial rr : . we } of 4 i 4 t f yn +, , t, ° i oe ad Ve Y e 4 Nrece a . t, - 7 4 " wy + 5 ¥ " 4 Ys Antes Ten Sri 0 CS e na . ‘ ” 4 oO . Did the defendant it adultery as all in ¢ nt 7 wlG , thio (CSe ) ’ Uy North Carolina Superior Court. 3 9 Tredell County. NAAN ~ > aracenia eck 4 4 4 -- a L i wre * eu 1 hoard ¢ ms ¢ his cause coming on to be heara 1t this Lis “ 3nues His Honor, Judge Bryson and a Jury, upon the is found all the issues in favor of the plaintiff: It is considered and adjudged by the matrimony existing be hereby dissolved. The Plaintiff will pay the cost. 7", D. Brysone court, tween the plaintiff and defendant be and the same are term of the Court before 1s submitted and Jury having that the bonds of Prediding. Judge. (SECOND WEEK) May Term, 1921. Superior Court. May Term, 1921. a ee et Honor T lefendan have been |! hat plaintiff and defendant have the filing of the complaint and and apart from each other for being born to them, prior to the is considered and adjudged by the Court, upon the issues found, thé he bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the tie defendant be and the same are hereby disolved, and that no liability against the plaintiff, in person or porperty, in favor of the defendant. D. Bryson. Judge Presiding. No. 85 North Carolina, Tredell County. Turner Mills Company 4 General the 27th 3, Director interest from il paid, and the costs o he action to be taxedby the Clerk of the Court against said cefendant. By Consent: wy. D. Turner Attorney for Plaintiff. Caldwell Attorney for Defendant. No. 84 North Carolina, Iredell County. Turner Mills Company 1S YO Th c and it appearin mised their di frerencd: t Ube Sourt that the parties to the action have compro~ In the Superior Court. May term, 1921. l BN Ti J) JUDGME! n James C, Davis, Diregtor of Railways in Unitgd| States. \ se coming on for hearing at this term of court, (SECOND WEEK) May Term, 1921. e considered, ordered and adjudged that the. } plaintiff have judghgnt (Kn aycordance with said compromise, and that it, | | i | the Turner Mills C ay r ector General of R&L1¥is ig United States, the sum of f30.F0 witn interest ozo, until paid, and the cost of the action to \ Over from the defendant, James,C. Davis, Dir- from the 27th of Court against said defendant. tT. D. Bryson. Judge Presiding. Turner » Attorney for Plaintiff. _, Attorney for Defendant. North Carolina In the Superior Court. County May Term, 1921. Roy Clin, by his Next friend, John A. Scott, Jr. Cc VS wea eo ee Sterling Mills, Incorporated. This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1921, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Nonor, T- D. Bryson, Judge Presiding, and a jury and being heard, and it appearing to the Court that the jury has answered the issues submitted to them as follows: lst: Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of defendant as alleged in the complaint ? 2nd: What damages, if any, has the plaintiff sustained ? ANS: $246.00 3rd: Has the defendant paid for the use and benefit of the plaintiff the amount of plaintiff is entitled to recover in this action % ANS: Yes. 4th: Is the plaintiff entitled to recover any further sum from the defendant ? ANS: No. I? IS THEREFORE, conssidered ordered and adjudged by the — Court that the plaintiff recover nothing further by this action than the amount, heretofore paid by the defendant for his use and benefit, and that (SECO) the defendant pay court. No 12 North Carolina, Iredell County. Voils “M. Hudson & Company. This cause coni appearing to the Court their differences by ti ID WELK) 1921. action to be taxed by the Clerk T. D. Bryson Judge Presiding. superior Court. S52] 7 ’ 9 1 » Ade ne Hundred Dollars and the Clerk {15.7 IT IS THEREFORE, adjuc and that the action be dismissed. By Consent: Dorman Thompson & H. W. D. Turner lf ec © BrvsoOne ’ v a a er eee ee Judge Presiding in the 15th Judicial 4 4 3 + District. P. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Attorney for Defendants No 91. North Carolina Iredell County A. T+ Rhinenardt Admr. of J. P. Rhinehardt vo Ve Mooresville Cotton Mill Co. Superior Court. May Term 1921. (SECOND WEEK) May Term 1921. np 1 ise coming on for hear $ YQ a} i O S of the ays to “ plaintiff is allowed thirty a file an al I 3 ng at this Term of the Court upon defendant and the Court being of the of i does not state a cause of action, the cdemur is therefore sustain- nended complaint t, owed thirty days thereafter to file answer thereto or itt may be advised. T. D,.. Bryson Judge Presiding. ylina Court. mty ) May Term 19¢l. Le ) : \ é ) J DGME ae} NON SU it. ir ) d T] cause comir yn at this term of t Court, before His &g ; : r 1 J ls } ‘ f c la 4 C ( ; 1%. aie irt a Lake -suit. Tt therefor liudged that the plaint be , L . my eas »- @ . ~ A . Jt e Presiding. Polina ) In Superior, Court. punt ) flay Term 1921, ) | > ‘ i \ tT ~ * a * co J D EN T. their differences, by the defendants agreeing sum of two satisfaction of all demands. at the plaintiff and the defendants have col hundred and sixty three dollars and 21700 of the court and Lo pay the plain- ani £ULE COA AT (SECOND WEEK) Mv t c May Term 1921, Tt is therefore considered and adjudged that t) of the defendants the sum of two hundren sixty three » 21/190 Ant} 4 CG © / LU { 1 r ¥ , 1 s : with interest thereon from June llth, 1921 T is } ther ec: ja 1 ; TY ~~ fur ner considadere Yr) ¢ guag t Lt ¢ t efe + y the costs of this action. n T rex La do ry ee TT, ry * Jui radi : > .ANnea Tahn A es By Consent gohn A. Gcott, Jr. 7 Dp fo 4 ¢ A . . * ‘an ne fe MESS, ittorne, or laint . Zed. - in! { A 4 , yy” ww ? ” o Rov Clins Hy $< NOX Wy j - = : Roy Cline, PO i CX ‘ : ; p 62 \ 444 LDL buf Sf c : hey Jitguind A rT 4 14 Zohn f.. Scott, Jr. ) fe, ; : \ a sie ce “a é S ) ISSUES. \ va . ae / terling l Sy Incor ‘yy t, i 4 see op saat i " o ist. 7 plat fu -! lef ant as allere nm the . 2 ‘Ss L E - , AM&s “7, eet & ” 7 t t . } +7 } 4 vids gnat ges, vy, pla f . O recover ? - . Bosc rn : 324 se 0 u 3rd: u 4 ef . 7 ym 4 Qe he + f° the nN] —rint 4 € ¥. t 1 i iT Gi UA t x Uf % + o os * etio ° ATT « °c saliwee L& . s a] ’ } 4 y my vy yt y 4th: Is the plaintiff entitled to recover any further 1 from the dant ? (SECOND WEEK) (SECOND WEEK) ‘May Term, 1921. May Term, 1921. ¢ ¥ | No 66 Srd: Did the defenddnt commit i mit adulte ry a alleged j the 7 | : a | | : leged i ; North Carolina ) In the Superior Court. \ complaint ? Tredell County ) May Term, 1921. | { Ans: Yes. Romas Campbell ) It is therefore considered, adjydged and decreed by the VS ) Lb Sy ee } Court that the boncs of matrimony heretofore 1 be twer the plain- Levi Campbell. ) tiff and defendant be, and the sane are hereby dissolved. > , : . } Ist: Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged J pay the costs of t - o pt t LAC ) é Ciar Y t ! ) y+ e j i the romp] t¢% | T rvson - ~~ e o * . ANS: y 58 Sees ae een Se Sore ee ag - . aa c € m ” 8nd: Is the plaintiff a resident of the State of Nort! Carolina, and did he reside in the State of North Carolina for more than two vears prior to the commencement of this action as alleged in the u & nN x }3 No. 13 omplaint ? } . rt o Se . | North Carolina ) Tn The Superior Court. Ans: Yes, ' ) Tredell County ) May Ter L921. 3rd: Did the defendant commit adultry as 4 lleged in the r [te Ans: Ye Se VS : S ° Lester Byers. ‘e C V6 GG : —/ q , North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court. lst: Did the plaintiff a efendant intermarry as alleg Iredell County ) May Term, 1921. in the complaint ? Ans : Ye . Romas Campbell ) ) 2nd: 7 + y1a + . resi + +ha 4 f yt vs ) JUDGMENT. ! > 4 ‘ " yr t ) Carolina and did she resid thi i ai Levi Campbell. ) i 7 4 two years before the commenceine t c LC ; 3 oe pla nt 7 This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this Ans: YeSe term of court, before His Honor, T. D. Bryson, Judge Presiding, and a a ‘ ; Sra: Did the defe lant co t er "oS" jury, and His Honor having dubmitted to the jury, and the jury having an- complaint ? 2 : ‘ : . * } } & Es e - swered the issues, as set out in the record as follows, to-wit: be clad ANS « LOpe lst: Did the plaintiffand defea dant intermarry, 45s | alleged in the complaint ? i ‘ 13 a ANS: Yes. “J No. 13 2 > . e . y ly SHynarptio C t, 2nd: Is the plaintiffaa resident of the State of North North Carolina, Tn the Superior Courve . oO Carolina, and did they resiede in the State of North Carolina for more Tred May Torm, 1921. ll County, ) than two years prior to the commencement of this action, as alleged in the complaint ? ANS: Yes. o TTS (SECOND WEEK) (3) AAA wee . s\o aah bo iF) ) May Term, 1921. ac f * has | > . a yr. + + 2VeE set Vs h " ' . 7. : ‘ Cora Bell Byers, ) nt : tas 1 ee ) ‘ 7 ‘ RY of rw: ) J U DG MSR: SS T4 4 ¥ he f ve . ’ \ ave wi ; / Lester Byers. ) atin bh ee ; - i : : a 1. { # 4 . . ° } 2 2 3 This cause coming on to be eard, and being rd of | . at this term of the Court before His Honor m, D. Bryson, Judge presid- cae ee Habe? a1 | ' ; 2 a jury, and “is Honor |! aving submitted to the jury, and the ‘ary having answered, the issues as set out in the record as follows: = es B ow ee wi a . | py Consent. he ¥) y nn : 4 7 ‘ ¢ 3 : . hei ge fe i coe ae : 4 P porman Jaomps< > yey % e Yr Pplai A . ist: Did the plaintiff and defeandant intermarry : . ~ a“ a w 1 ee 9 wOW2aS & WOW1LS, Avuve *’ Defenda Ss € ec re y . alleg I A‘ : GD e T nr ; as - o ‘ No. 7 Qnd: Is the plaintiff a resideant of the otate ] ij North Carolina y bn 7 fn as ath Cann’ 4 : : at oes me 1 CHtate ort Caro? North Caroling ) 1 ri ourt.e f rt 5aAro she x r j . edel County \ sd Tay me) 1 5 4 two year efore the ) icement of this act 4 li- | fredeit Lounty. ; rily . i 4 CO 17 ; 4 9 f ; . I > 7 as - a . . | Jessie B. VanCamp, Grace 1 I ) ) Ans? YES e nd ah ‘eather Wad 4 ‘ | and Isabel McPherson, letr ) \ ‘6 ooo money ~ ¥ os law of W. H. Biackt Y ; \ } ‘ 2 2 ) ; L L * vs ) ‘ I ” S \ - F / A ' i . . Py ” ; art Cason and wife, I . r , T+ +iiarefor red a jue a r | - - > vw vy a a John Lindsay. ) 4 CO ~ + £ 4 4 QO c > tr x7 ere 4 _— re 2x i st 1. - het, we en £ mT), c ca cn O ¥ 4 he ~ 4 4 " . Ly t pla Ak jie fea t e, 2 the rme€ re ereby, di sOolVé é This ¢ j i i thn G1, 4 ane Ae Tran Of ' Me ) . } ' : 2 2 + 1 Vil c or ol @) . 4 J. i . ® , TT further ‘ red a adjudged that th chin ceil one meee 4 . . , I I L & 7 t T Dp ~ of I « $5, ’ and hei ee rl { Ann oj ( { ’ : vee od ean , taxed by the Clerk of this Judge Presiding, anda jury, 4 ’ i uw 4 \ 4 - / Y ~ » he 8 aaewe i me = fat 6 4 Court that the jury answered the issue submitted Lic i eee Ure PL 6 1 ae 1 we pr ¢ } 14.4 A #6 6thea Nosge T. D. Bryso Are the plaintiffs the owner d entitled to the poss & © . ory Jile " rs T aiAnhine oe | me 3 ° . * } AA 2 4 ° Judge Presiding. | esion of the lands described 11 the comp | ; Ans: Yes. | | i : 4 } nye i and adiudesc by the Court It is therefore considered, ordered ane aa juasg oom 3 Ke j de oO | $341 » 4 i a nAatate a that th 5 eh ana tha owners of and entit .o the immediate pos= a ‘ , . i eo that the plaintiffs are the mer: j nt North Carolina ) In the Superior Courte 2 psal oa $ * . 2 1£ STH 4y in hig ¢ ae ession of the lands described in the complaint in this cause, > =. 3 - =) ~ » It is further ordered that a writ isaue from this Court to — . the Sheriff of Iredell County directing said Sheriff to dispossess the the defendants of the land described int the complaint and that the 4 4 ee ee ee ee ae e 4 ~" ~ a2 ' ws 4 4 . Plaintiffs be placed in possession of said lands. At the @efendants pay the costs of I Honor i red th This cause coming on to be heard before His Hono, {7 It is further orde this action to be taxed by tie Clerk of this Court. Tt, D. Brysone Judge Presiding. T. D. Bryson, Judge Presiding over the May Term, 1921, of the Supertok | i Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the piain= (SECOND WEEK) May Term, 1921. “Tiss? North Carolina, tn the Superior Court. Tredell County. May Term, 1921. Mary ©. Reavis and Annie Marion and Zelda Reavis, by their next and mother, Mary C. Reavis, WweO a U-D @.B.8 s. Executor of R. M. Spann, G. Reid, Executor of Mary V ee a ae Se Se ee See See See Se See See See Spann, and Martha G. Campbell. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, T- D. Bryson, Judge Presiding in the Fifteenth Judicial District of forth Carolina, and it appearing to the court that the complaint in this action was filed January 6th, and that said complaint was duly verified and | that the summons was duly served and executed on the defendants including y Martha G. Campbell. That service on the latter being on the 10th day of January, 1921, and t»at the said G. Campbell, who has been duly made a party defendant to this action, has failed and neglected to file an answer to the complaint of the plaintiffs. And it further appearing to the court tiat I. G. Reid, Executor of R. M. Spann, and also as Executor of Mary V. Spann, filed an answere in said cause admitting the facts as set forth in the petition, and after hearing the cause, thé court being of the opinion that the plain+ tiff is entitled to the relief prayed for, upon the admissions of the de=- fendants in his said answer, and upon failure of said Martha G. Campbell to file an answer in said cause. And it further appearing to the court that the defendant I. G. Reid, as Executor aforesaid, has in his possession a deed executed by Mary V. Spann for the lands described in the complaint, which deed, after the death of said R. M. Spann, was found among the val- uable papers of said Mary V. Spann, deceased, and that said deed is now in possession of I. G. Reid, Executor aforesaid, who is threatening to regist it upon the records of Iredell County. Now Therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that Mary C. Reavis, is the owner in fee, and is entitled to the possession of the land described in the complaint and known as the Weatherman tracte It is further ordered that I. G. Reid, the Executor of Mary V. Spann, | (SECOND WEEK) May Term, 1921, ve deliver up to the aintiff Me i ; ee, ph ff , Mary C. Reavis, the unregistered deed now in his pessession, exectted by Mary V. Spann to R. M Spann, and ti : . L data -\e se) & m 1 xv the deed be, and the same is hereby cancelled, in Mthal the alae 1 order that the cloud upen her Ett =) be , and the same . he re by remnc e 1 ro S 1] i . e aul 2 s\ / \ a vita IV 2G I . Ne] a. J al d tract of It is further considered, ordered and Reavis is the owner in fee and entitled to the aforesaid, subjact to the @bts of said 1! ae f a4 ac ntaAr P one ts Reic as Exec. ° arr 5 : Execu yf 1 } , yonvert the same said te! tatPrix e } Ppdae 1 the Int? fr nan PEN) he » further ordered that intif ecover of the defendant, I. Reid, Executor of Mary action to betaxed the Clerk of this court Le Carolina County May Term 1921. Templeton 2 before His Honor, m TY “e 2 4 ~@ 4 Bryson, and being heard and it appearing that the plaintiff and defendant Aave compromised their differences upon the pay ent of the sum of 4200.00 to the plaintiff, and it further appearing that said amount) has been paid: Tt is therefore ordered, adjudged and decrecd that the plaintiff be:non-suited and that the plaintiff pay the costs in the action | to be taxed by the Clerk. a D. Brysone Judge Presiding. By Consent: Dorman Thompson , R. T. Weatherman, Attorney for Plaintiff. Zeb. V. Turlington Attorney for Defendant. . SECO ND ( (SECOND WEDK) May } May Term, 1921, | } JUDGMBNY®, | ) | J. H. and.fe E... Lee ) j Mada ee ct bia oa i es | eo : This cause coming on to be hear efore His Honor 7. D. Bryson ace c TO I 2 wo U E 2 : : sap : ys Judge ana a Jury A ( vd Py AY & A f Ia é tf ni or Mack Goodman ) five dollars. Tt is adjudged that the plaintiff recover of thedfendant the i - ale : PP u ? . q the 1ef ice of b 1. Wasithe plaintiff, J. H. Lee, injured by the negligence of “ sum of ninety-£8¥@ dollars and costs of action ; f iG . s lefendant as allered in: tne. co nnlaint ? | + ‘ U + ame YG ~ 2 , . e é | Ween Wa et ata AUS. VeSe A 1 ¢ Dy» j i | " * rae! tT T i } meaann of his owr 714 cannt end. Did the plaintiff, J. H. hee, by reason Of nis Own negligence} i | 4 wi hia4 4 hie iniuries as allered in the answer ? contri pute oO T1358 -41 Jur L©S aS ALseozxeG r ,tL ansvel $ i | 4 | ANS. Noe ok | No 77 ae / @ - i , North Carolina ) tt ‘ior Ci . wm 1 * fn 77 _ T . 4 $4 } . +} i: . re ‘ a ‘ 3rd: ; t plaintiff, H. E. Lee, injured b he neglig of | ) | Tredell Count ) ern, J . efeyr ert i a oa. 2 | A ss a | \ stall aed | | Royal Motor Company ) | | me 1 : : P oe eae ars ies 1 aie <- he ss 14 \ | : hs 4th: Did the plaintiff, i. B. Lee, by reason of his own negligence We ) J : } j 4 . 0 4 $ $34 9° ' . ) mnbtribute O° hi Injury 5 : . Matze } ANS: Os i * t ’ 1¢ , seers Thi ( i 1 ily 4 » OF * * , pp ~ tr ba eT ae 5th: jnat damage, if any, is the plaintiff, J. H. Lee, éntitled Oth ? nat iag f y r 47 as Z + nn 4 . the Superior Court of Iredé1l Co vy 0 ? ee . , 4 | 2 » recover from the defendant ? uk e Pres t f Co rt 1 A t ie * 2 | © ~ 29 ANS: 9 0 . _* ) \ ~ it ,~VvVerv | ma ; ; : : ; oo ‘0° ty t tsa 4 | ( t LC t Dd rf : ) r id LZ l p : sal : . - T ++ a i 6th: jhat damage, ft ny, is the plaintiff,. 4H. BE. Lee, entitled | od ¥ j od nee ; 4 ‘ * four and 40/100 dollars; it appear inthe » bie . | Oo reco’ » fr the 1é fi ndant ? | | | ? , : Sha, 4 4 + 4 y } 7 er } > ress | | M. Matze, at the time the a | A VTC? « * YO i ' ne | i C44 sf 7 at} Carolina a 1t— therefore the yroperty att- | | j it of the Late f rt 7aro : A , - as 7 i 4 ae ~ | ached by tl e ¢ arif or z - lel yunt 4 ule reec fr pak t Ol | * nan ao he aee hae ) It is therefore considered, ordered and adjucse tiie | ) ' i | ) [ MY N } 2 A 1 + « a + 1. aia here hy dis nis Cle ' VS ) JUDG EN T. |} Court that said attachment be ana t 5 NEPeny GLems ees i | i 2 | , and adiudeead that the plaintiff ree Mack Goodman ) tt is further ordered and adjudged that He dersned i Pr . m nD R so 1 S bho wis f Two Hu dred i orty-four a d 40/1 00 This caus coming on to be heard before His Honor T. B. Bry cover of the defendant the sum o ta Re ee E 1g i $ 7 7 his ‘tion tc » taxed b the Clerk of his Court. T f > 1 ‘ . . “o 2 , 5 ive a 1s ration +6 be ta vudge and the Jury, and the Jury having assesed plaintiffs damage at 55 00> dollars and the costs of this actio f y It is ordered that the plaintiff recover of the defendant a : } ; j A : ¥e ° a \ Ts » Brysone the su f Five dollars and costs of this action. Y; ; Ee D y Judge Presiding. 1. Di Bryson, i, At tc tiff. a Jee By ¢ Thompson Attorney for Plain ae Judge Presiding. igs i BY Consent Dorman Thomp ’ a. @ D. Turner , Attorney for Defendant, a ( SECOND WEEK ) . May Term, 1921. : In the Superior Court. ° ‘3 S 3 = we » V——— Qo May Term, 1921. No. 29 Worth Carolina Tredell County 7. C. Moore (SECOND May re WEEK) Term, 1921 Tn +} Cry , ny n tne Superior Court. May é rm, 1921. vec VS TT, Ds Bryson. Wwdze Presiding Judge Presiding. J. P. Patterson re compro ra Benson Mido Lnis a udge Presidin & divorce, and we? L and it appearing we t further appearin ment of this action the defendant It is therefore adjudged by the he sane ig hereby ron-mited, and it Is pay costs of this action. heard before Hi onor, T. ryson, the Court that this is an action for - to the Court that, since the commence= Court that this action is and s further adjudged that plaintiff T, Ds. Brysone Judge Presiding. an Wr SVT TP oBUO | aner | (SECOND WEEK) SECOND WEEK) ff n 2) LV Ne yn 199°} May Term, 1921. . rm, 191 | | . ; 0.58 | | nT ; e | 7H | No, 94 Worth Carolina ) Superior Court, In Superior Court. ) pr eee ne Tredell County ) ; co ee | r 7 Pe —) fauv y 19°21 May Tern LOYGL | Iredell County ) May T ly 21% | 9. J. Morrison. ) | \ | eo WS ( 2 May PinK APrUNUPS 1S ; , ) TsSsveéEs. x ) ) Jas. C. Davis ) wai Director Gen. Railway, Wer aintiff and defend:nt married as alleged in the com-= sts: ere Plai ara CALL . 2 Oia “T heat & In +} t t 1 ( Pe 4 , fe ” . a cpat re fixed against plaintiff. : ie Be j intiff 1 defendan ived separate and apart | we ees . it Have the plaintiff «nd defendant lived parate and apart t.0 Pe i a yw £ ie e4 sars pri to the besinni: of this action 7 an five years prior tO UNG VSEsLINIAnS Mt Mate? ye Or ff | : Yes. eg : ; : the pl tiff been a resident of the State of Nor | ° 1 Wy 4° > ti years srior tot £ egi Z of thi Lot i, hh T os North Carolina ) dor rte ESe | Iredell Couniy ) ! Yi. i { | Statesville Lumber Company? me is ) | TO ) wo ¢ ot 1 ; V4 ) ) T m Sur ior Co rs hy ‘ | ; ‘ a fs , J. (3%. Roseman ) t ) Before the Clerk. 3 i | | j Ls L: T 4 dbf: 1 4 1 tr ni 4 HD ‘ irthur: ) ) | She GiTT } avir vwern a y 4 ( 1yW ’ } a Cony Lé L + T U 1) f tT ule 1 i cf” 1 vi} ) a ca . | and if », in + 9 + 9 ; | | irs. / i i c fn vg 2 ee ea ey ne Ns 637.78 wit , t f P ‘ 6 Gi nae se CO C u he ar st thi ter ( 4 perior 5 | ads Mid the defer mnt a0 + = a e contre ce ufacte j fab hie Ji NA L 1 * } C r I Y D v Tudece P 1 and } ie Ni 1 f redell ounty before Honor 7. D. ryson, dge presi 5 of ure and deliver lumber to the pl 43PP 9 Lleg { int, d 3 , 1 os eae ay ‘= 4 1 £ ana; eawh s 4 4 acl 2 - c Lyvor of} a ee ie Sa ee re ae lO SRRUEE FORMS ere . | o t damare has plaintifi taindd ? so es | away tthe defendant | oc a ry / Lid agéinbsat Get ANT. A 5: 750. 0 is MTTIMDMAA DT * > ~ + ee ii ada! gl oa + he TT ts THEREFO Ts considered Ps ordered al a djudged that the | atrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be, and ure hereby, dissolved. It is further considered anda adjudged No. 42 vlaintiff pay the costs of action as taxed by the Clerk. Nort : ) Tn the Superior Court. La , 1 J J . J NOr h Carolina In I i . ; 1 4 2 J Ty OQ Pace ie 19021 } 3 e 3rd day of une, 1921. Iredell co nty ) May Term, l9el. | 2OUNTY | z ] Statesville, Lumber Company I. D. Brysons Rs Judge Presiding. s — ee 8 ey at oO Q =F 3 Roseman his cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Court before His Honcr T. D. Bryson gudge présiding and a fury , and Kis Honor submitted to the jury the following issues, and the jury PAnee answered said issues as foliows, to wit Ist: Is the defendant (SECOND #EEK) te aw ay Term, 1921, May Term, 1921, af 31 eard be A 14 a Han a Sith id a court and being heard before His Honor T. D. Bryson, Judge and a Jury upon intiff by reason of plaintiff having overpaid defendant on lumber 4s alleged ik at | : >+ ee ar ah a nA ana she iia s the issues and whole recora, and the Jury having answered the issues in 2 s tr ha ANNOY ? in the complaint and if so, in yhat. amount 7 favor of the plaintiff. NS; 2637.78 with interest vhereon from June 1st, 1917. : It is therefore considered and adguged by the Court that Ond: Did the defendant comsit a breach of contract to manufacture the »onds of matrimony existing betwe the complaint and if so, } r plaintiff and defendant be and the . game is hereby dissolved. rt Lime as plaintiff sustained ? Ww " - 4, - a 7 T wes ANS: Tes, 750.00 rT. BD. Bryson, ? 7 A Sander ew 4 Airy £44 ¢ i * Judgre Presiding. 1% therefore considered and adjudgea by tne Court that the plain- Ge ¢ & tft: > ver of the fendant the sum of -5637.78 with interest thereon from June lst, 1917 until paid. It furthe considered and adjudged Mi i No. that pl tiff recover of ‘he defendant the furtl Ss of $750.90 Ase | North Carolina, ) In t inerior Court. a ( ; reac of tract by def day ‘; nterest ther rom ) Tredell County. ) I Term, 1921. 23rd 1921 until paid. Tt is further considered andadjudged tat the defendant pay the | C.:%. Fouchee, ct al, ) P ~ + Lo t, ‘XE by t a Cler} 4 f } ,O Bagg oe | ) vs ) REPORT OF SALE. T, D. Bry ‘ ) : | Purity Bottling Company ) J Pr id fl 3 j ‘3 | | The undersigne d receiver of the Purity Ltling Company | | respectfully reports that on June 24th, 1920, he of ered for sale at 61 | ; public auction in the City of Hendersonvil e, li. ©. after due advertise= th Carol ) Superior Court. | t i ) | ment all of the machinery, fixtures and property of the sald Purity Bottling Trec County ) May Ter i, 1921. | ve ‘ ei sae) | Company's Hendersonwille plant, and that no bid was receive for said prop- pany Henderson | a a i f ~ Froaned 44 yoy ¢ > Parker ) | erty that he re-advertised said property and again offered 1% for sale at a2 As fe i é | dv d | | i ae io t “ ee af #420 9 ¢ ye IS ) TBSUsS | said place on July 23rd., 1920, at which time a pid of $300.00 was made by ‘ ~ Me , - & * j saad s - al / = * 4 m ’ s 4 é , ai a 4 sa ios a +} on) idder declined and ref- Parke | Phil. Thibadeau for said property: it the said bidder decl i ee : at hie eaid bid or any other amount and that | used to take said property at his said bid or any other amoun' a's 4 | Let: Nid vnlaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged ? i 4 ‘ * c 144 a ee Pe ae cet ea ae ae ne or cian cached ey Mk I A ; Soattio he nancit soneition of said | the undersigned, upon investigation of the financial ition of I A NIE « Vv | ‘ a4 ae ee : a ati: nsolvent; at the undersigned made dilig- | bidder, found him to be totall) insolvent; that 31 2nd: Has plaintiff been a resident of the State Gor two years i fe ese ae nnahie +o Pa ie ge ni : z e | ent effort to dispose of said property afte wards but was unable to do so, ext preceedir the filing the complaint ? : sre wan Ec bt oye : nig ee p Fliing, 6 Pier t he ; and on or about the 2lst day of Jan. 1921, this said prppertg was sold by Tax Collectors of Henderson, 4. Wil i ANS: Yes. ; | cn N. CG, and of the City of Hendersonville | | ord: Did defendant commit adultery as alleged in.the complaint ? 7 oo 13 1 Jerson County, and the : is N.C. for taxes due the State of North Carolina, Handerpon wows? | 4 wT BE tota= AS 3 OB» N. C., and that the proceeds of said was City of Hendersonville, N. gale of the taxes and the costs of the sale; that on thé lly consumed in payment sesso frered for sale at public auction day of June 26th., 1920, the undersigned o North Carolina Superior Court machinery, fixtures and property of the — after due advertisement, a11 of the oighodr agama ) mt ee. ee lant and that no bid was received at Purity Bottling Company's Statesville p Thomas Parker Vs et ee See JUDGMENT. Minnie Parker ott: This cause coming on to be heard at this term of” 480 | (SECOND WEEK) May Term, said sale; 921. hat he made diligent effort afterwards to Gispose of said pro- perty at private sale and was unable to get a s@tisfactory offer, and that again on May 23rd., 1921, after due adve at public sale for said property, said bid being made by sale the undersigned has received an ny of $485.00 cash for the property of tesville plant, upon the condition that said } that the undersigned has made diligent effort unable oO do so and theref property but ] } J the Granite Fall t the highest bid received offered .said property at said sale was 8350.00 opencer; that since said 4 the Granite Falls Bottling | Purity Bottling Company's offer is accepted for ore respectfully recom» Ss Bottling Company for said authorized to make said sale and deliven n full of their said offer; as undersigned, a fair and more than it would further reports t) Thi Court upon the report of D, L. wayner, Receiver, appearing to the Court from said Report that the the Crgel Le Falls DR + 1 OY mnaneuwta ‘ a4 j a Bottling Company's Statesville plant is full, fair and adequate, and that™ S cause coming on to be heard at this term of the bring at a leslie oteiieecceatia ics teceiver. ior Court. OF SATR VAL WAL Lulu and being heard, and it offer of $485.00 cash by Bottling Company for the property of the said Purity it would ty be hereby confirme: by authorized No, 7 Jessie B, Van Samp, Grace Blackburn and “sabel McPherson, Héars at law of W.H, Blackburn VS. Mert Carson and wife, Ida B, Carson and John Lindsay, o °) ry > , Yr i: es ae * i j { I ‘ ‘ lst. Are the plaintiffs the owners and entitled to the Possession of the lands described in the complaint ? Answer; Yes “gil (SECOND WEEK) May term, 1921, May Term, 1921 No. 56 North Carolina, | American Wholesale Corporation | al Iredell County, § Die Cis sees vs. § rssuvy s, @,C,+apish j T,A.Miller & son t = VS- Is the defendant indebted to the Plaingiff and if so in | Janes c Davis, Director neral 1 what amount ? | of Railroads, as Agent 1der ( J T GMEN ? Answer: Yes, $436.68, with interest from July 17th, 1920, | Section 206 of the Trans ortation | | Act of 1920, i { | This cause coming on to be heard at the erm, 1921, of the No, 56 | Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, T,D, ryson, Judge North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Presiding and a jury, and being heard and it pearing to the Court that Iredell County, § May term, 1921, & non-suit has heretofore been take is a: to t co-defendant, the Southern Retiway Company, the in4ury is t Sis of this action American Wholesale Corporation § | having been sustained while the operation t tr ut vs. i JSUDGMEN®, é on of the trains of the Southern “allway Company were under the nc ] T.A,Miller \ t } ca | General of Railroads, and it further an Caring that the action arainst May term, 1921, of the! | Walker D, Hines, Director veneral of Railroads, has been dismisse and before His Honor, T.D,Bryson, Judge ! } “émes C, Davis, Director General of “41; it appearing to the Court that | 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920 This cause coming on to be heard at the i Superior Court of Iredell County, Presiding, and the jury, and being heard ana ‘the jury has answered the issue submitted to them as follows; euse, and it appearing further to the Court that the jury has "Is the defendant indebted to the plaintirr and if so, | answered the issues submitted to whem as follows: what amount ", ist, Was the aintiff injure ) egligence of thx Answer: Yes, $436.68, with interest from July 17th, 1920, | defendant &3 alleged in the comp! t ? It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court | Answer, Yes, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $436, 68, together | ‘nd, Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to with interest thereon from July 17th, 1920 » until paid and the cost of this his own injury ? ed by the Clerk of this Court, | i action to be tax Answer, No, tT, D, Bryson Judge Presiding. ord What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? -@ WLLe Ad LCA Be NG ah } Answer, $1,300.00, | It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court | that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, James C, Davis, Director | §eneral of & j j } } allroads as Ageht under Section 206 of the Transportation Act ig 1920, the sum of ascii 00, and interest on said sum from the 23rd day of May, 1921, until paid, and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, T, D. Bryson 3 ucke 6siding, SECOND WEE} ) i Tay 1Q°04 v ~ Vs iby ~ ~* North Carolina, ) In the Supe » Court eee poenty ) Before the Cler} 3 ) . ovS~ ) JUDGME ' ) J. O. Gaither. ) This cau { wt hefare 2. Ax ‘Hawtin ete wl & Jo As r » Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, State f North Carolina, on Monday wns 1S5th., i921, and being heard, 1 it appearing to the Coirt from the evidence: produced, that this i in action two notes, 4 t 1 i A r c 2 fe ae &. S. Zest, N. E. Marnheard } efore J. A. Hartness This cause coming on to be heard before J . Clerk of the’ Superior Court of Tredell County, State of North Carolina, on the Second Monday of June, the same being the i3th, day of June, 1921, and being heard, and it appearing to the Cairt and the Court ua as | or CONFESSED» x LTT ee ic tg Im ity tz Ir2 | (SECOND WEEK) net May Term, 1921, facts, from all the evidence produced, which is adjudged to be satisfactory North Carolina, | In | proof of this cause of action, that this is an action on a note, and that n the Superior Court summons in this action was issued more than ten days prior to the First re Iredell County.} Before the Clerk, Mond J and mad urnat 1 said d 1 +} er ney-Jones Co onday of 1@, 1921, and made returnable on said date, and that a verified ey pe eeey: meer t compla t wa filed in thi ) Lc it the time of the i ssuing of. the sn ' ; VS. { CONBESSED ¢UDpeG MUN , - ; oe 2 Beis ~ een ee me i ee ee ee cee et ae 'T f | in this action, and that a copy of the said complaint was served on oy aieere stand } ar a 4 ‘ . . } P T Nel i mS . . ? é if the defendants at the time when they were served with the summons | oe D.N,McLellana, the defendant, in the above entitled cause, | : . a ‘ s+ i on MW in this action, and that this action is brought ona note for the rec hereby confess judgment in favor of Aehoney-=Jones -overy Company, plaintiff, for > 7 ” J j } n + we » 3 ~ % ¥ f Pour Hundre ind no/oo dollars and interest on same at he rate of six | $313.50 dollars, and authorize the entry of judgment thereof against rT ~ fe a = r cent per annum from the 15th. day of May, 1917, until pagd, and that | D.N,MeLeliend, on the 16th day of June, 1921, ach of e@id defendants siged said note, and that the defendants, A. S. Wedt it. The confession of Judgment is for debt now justly due from Ne ,e Barnhe ardt, failed and neglected t file an an swer to said " { D,N.MeLelland, to the said Plaintiff +, “ahoney-Jones Company, of Bristol, Va pl oe ‘: bateee tra cua Monday of June, 1921 and that the def. dank’ arising from the following facts; te . Morefield, filed SW to s onplaint; | | The said plaintiff Mohoney-Jones Co,, 2 corporation doing business It is therefore, orfered and adjudged by the Cart ¢ the | under the laws of Va,, at Bris ot, Va., Sold and delivered unto the said plaint J. '. Davis, recover of the defendants, A. &. West . E. Bard D.N.McbLelland, a merchant et New Hope, N.C., doing business under the name rdt, jointly everally, the sum of Four Hundred d no/loo doll val | of D,N.McLelland, in said County of Iredell and State of North Carolina, ; betnak + ena cake ae Jee ak we heen Sth. | ary goods and notions to the amount of $313.30 dollars, and the said day of May, 1917, until bis Bouts oe tela Guid oe defendant thereby executing his three checks, one for the sum of $113.30, , . bs, A. S. Fest a - #. Har rdt, taxed by this Court, | one for the sum of $100.00 dollars, and the third one for the sum of $100.06. Tt furt > adjucg irder that this cause against the defenda e | dollars, making the total sum of $513.30 dollars, and said checks having G. FP. Morefield, be transferred to c ivil Superior Court docket to be tried| | been dishonored, they and each of them are hefeby due and unpaid, which at the next Term of the Superior Court of Tredell County, | | constitutes this entire indebtedness, Said checks are hereby filed and This June 13th, 1921, | | made an exibit to this judgment, but will not be coppied in this judgment, Jc. aeteees:. | Said sum is due to said Wahoney-Jones Co., plaintiff, over and above all Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell. | | Just demands that D,N,.McLelland has against Mahoney-Jones Company. TIT. But 1% is further agreed, that if the defendant in this Cause, D,N,McLelland, makes a payment unto the Clerk of the Superior Court, &t his office in Statesville, N.C., of Fifty Dollars, upon the 15th of | July, 1921, and continues upon the the 15th of each succeeding month there~ ‘ efter to pay unto the Clerk's office in Statesville, N.C. a like sum of Fifty Dollars, untill this judgment is paid, that the said plaintiff, Mahoney-Jones Co,, will treat this judgment as a continuing judgment, and Will allow said defendant, D.N.,McLelland to pay off the same as above Stipulated, without issuing an execution thereof: but in the event said defendant failes to pay said Fifty Dollars, upon the 15th of July, and each Succeeding month thereafter, then the condition is to become null and void, and en execution will issue immediately hereon, Or if said defendant allows other judgments and executions to be made and levied upon his 4 ' CONFESSION JUDGMENT, continued, propenty, without first satisfying Same, then and in this event this condition to this judgment will become null ana void, and an execution will therefofe be issued hereon, The Clerk of this Court will pay said sum of | j Fifty Dollars, unto the plaintiff Mahoney-Jones Cow, upon demand of the same, and wiil continue to pay said sums upon demand to said Plaintiff, or his Attorney J.M,Harris, as they are paid into this Court, be R N, McLelland D,N.McLellana, being duly Sworn, says that the facts stated in the above confession are true, and that the amount of the judgment confessed is justly-due the plaintiff, Mahoney-Jones Company. D,N, MeLelland Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 16th day of June, 1921, J. WV, Sharpe , Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court, fhe eo | Med |ran, /GR/ / North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, ) Iredell County. ) June 3rd, 1921, Turner Mills Company. Vs James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 or JUDGMEN?, the Transportation Act of 1920, This cause coming on for hearing at this term of the Court and it appears ing that the parties have compromised their differences $108.67. for the sum of It appearing that Southern Railway Company is not a proper party to the action, the cause is dismis ed as to said Railway Company, and the cause as to W. D. Hines, Director General of Railroads is dis- missed, and James C. Davis, Director Géneral of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920 igs Substituted, as sole defendant in said cause. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff, Turner Mills Company have judgment against the defendant James C. Davis » Director General of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920, for the sum of 4108.67 ana inter- est from 27th February 1920 until paid and cost of action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. tT. D. Bryson. Judge Presiding. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County ) June Srd 1921. Turner Mills Company Vs James ©, Davis, Rarector General Of Railroads, a nt under Section JUDGMENT ) 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920 This cause coming on em at this Term of the Court and it appearing that Southern Railway Company is not a proper party thereto Said cause is dismissed as to Southe y Company; and it appearing that w, D. Hines, Director General is not paoper party thereto, said se bi Thee /$4/ action 1s ee w. D. Hines, Director General of Railroads and is substitued by J ,jDavis, Director General of Railroads, as Agent North Caroline, } In the Superior Court, under Section 206 of the rtation Act of 1920, as sole defendant, Iredell County. Before the Clerk, and it further appearing that\the garties thereto have compromised theip | Carolina Motor Company | differences: a 4 | -VS- \ It is therefore considered, orde nd adjudged by the Court JUDGMENT, | ¢,B, Stewart { that the plaintiff have judgment in accordance with d compromise and that plaintiff, Turner Mills Company recover of the defendant, James C, This cause coming on to be heard before J,A,Hartness, Clerk of Davis, Director General of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 of the the Superior Court of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, and being transportation Act of 1920, the sum o° $150.90 with intere>t from 27th | neard on the Second Monday of July, the same being the 11th day of July, day of February 1920 until paid and the costs of the action to be taxed | 1921, and it appearing to the Court and the Court having found as a facts, by the Clerk of the Court. from all the evidence produced, which is adjudged to be satisfactory proof Rryson of this cause of action, that this is an action on two notes, and that Judge PFSSLCANE. summons was issued in this action more than twenty days prior to the First Monday of July, 1921, end made returnable on that date, and that a verified By consent complaint was filed in this office at the time the summons was issued in H. D. Turner Atty for plaintiff this action, and that a copy of said complaint was served on said defendant L. C. Caldwell Atty for Defendant at the time he was served with the summons, and that this is an action on two notes for the recovery of Two Hundred and Twenty and 90/100 Dollars and interest on same at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 24th. dir } os 2 re VATA Oo dey of January, 1921, until paid, and for the further sum of Forty-two and North Carolina, Superior Court 10/100 Dollars and interest on same at the rate of six per cent per annum Iredell Coury. } May Term, 1921, June Srd., from the 4th day of April, 1921, until paid, and that the said defendant, C.B,Stewart, failed and neglected to file ean answer or demur to said Turner Mills Company, 4 complaint on or before the Second Monday of July, 1921, the same being the -VSe { JUDGMENT. llth day of Jhly, 1921. Southern Railway Company. Southern y peny. | It 4s therefore, ordered and adjudged by the Court thet the This ¢ause coming on for hearing at this term of the Court plaintiff, Carolina Motor Company, recover of the defendant, C.B.Stewart, before His Honor, T.D,Bryson, judge and it appearing that the parties to the sum of Two Hunderd and Twenty and 90/100 Dollars, with {interest on sane said cause have compromised thier differences for the sum of $130,906 | at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 24th dey of January, 1921, It is therefore considered erdered and adjudged that the until paid, and the further sum of Forty-two and 10/100 Dollars, with in- | plaintiff Turner Mills Company recover of the defendant, Southern Railway | terest on the same at the rate of six per cent per annum from the 4th day | Company the sum of One Hundred and Thirty and 90/100 Dollars with interest of April, 1921, until paid, and the costs of this action to be paid by the from 27th day of February 1920, until paid and costs of action to be | said defendant, C,3B,Stewart, taxed by the Clerk of the Court, ea. | This July 1lth,, 1921. ' : J. A. Hertniess | Fee rane cea Clerk or the Superior court or — : Iredell County. By Consent: W.D, Turner, Atty for Plaintiff UC, Caldwell,’ Atty for Defendant, JUDGEMENT BEFORE CLERK. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County.} Before the Clerk, Gilmer Dry Goods Company, q .WBe q JUDGMENT. ——_— T,A,Miller, trading end doing 4 business as T.A.Miller & Son. | This cause coming on to be heard on this the llth day of July, 1921, before, J.A.Hertness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the Court that the summons in the action was issued on the 23rd day of June, 1921, end that service of said summons was accepted on the 23rd day of June, 1921, by T.A,Miller, the defendant in this cause, and that at the same time said defendant acknowledged receipt of a verified copy of the complaint, which verified copy was filed at the time said summons was issued, and it appearing further that said summons was made returnable oh Mondey the 4th day of July, 1921, and said summons required the defendant to appear and answer or demur to said complaint, on or before Mondey the llth day of July, 1921, same peing the Second Monday in the month; and it appearing further to the Court that said defendant has failed to answer or demur to said complaint on or before said llth day of July, 1921: It is, therefore, caused, ordered and adjudged by the Court thas the plaintiff recover judgment against the defendant for the sum of $1250.66; end interest on $838.27 from the 30th day of November, 1920, until paid, and interest on the sum of $412.29 from the 10th day of December, 1920, until paid, and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. This the llth day of July, 1921. J.'A, Har'tne's's Judgment before Clerk July 20th., 1921. North Carolina, } In the Superior Court Iredell County. | In Term, The Dental Manufacturers Supply Co.] wT 4 JUDGMENT, —_—_— — ee Dr. J.M,Holland, { The defendent having paid the amount due and owing plaintiff comes into Court and takes a non-suit, It is therefore considered and adjudged that plaintiffs action be and the same is hereby non-suited, This July 20th., 1921, J.A.4artness Clerk Superior Court, POAAAIIONSADAISAIGISAABIOATISOAVOAAIVA i yar SDSALADALD HE CLERK North Cardlina,| In Superior Court, Iredell County. | July 2lst., 1921, S.R,Holland, individually, and as Guardian of Helen Holland (Conley) -VS~ Helen Holland Conley and her husband J,A.Conley The defendants having paid the debt upon this action is based, and the cost of the action, the plaintiff takes a non-suit, This July 2lst., 1921. J. A. Hartness erk puperior Cour redell County, North Carolina. 494 495. Monday, August lst,, 1921, | | | | North Carolina,} ; 4 August Term, 1921, | Iredell County. | Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in and for the county of Iredell, on the 5th Monday before the lst Monday in September, A.D, 1921, the same being the ist day of August, 1921, At 10 o'clock, A.M. the High Sheriff of Iredell County called Court to Order, and then declared that the Court take a recess until Tuesday morning, Auge end, 1921, when and where all defendants and witnesses shall re-appear | without renewing their bonds, which order was given by telegram by the Court. : w , Court i. Be it further remembered that this Honorable, convened at 10 Nave A ‘ o'clock, A.M, .:Twesday morning, August end., 1921, for the dispatch of business, when and where His Honor, P,A. Mcklroy, judge presiding, is present and presiding, and Honorable, Fayden Clement, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the name of the State, M,P.,Alexander, The High Sheriff of Tredell County, is present end returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the First week of this term, toewit: R.S.Keller, J.L.,Houston, J,A,Tatum, R,A,Stimson, G.B. White, Avery L,Brawley, M.K,Brown, R,P.Holmes, A.H.Reece, J.M.Godfrey, LW. Hix, H,C,Dellinger, F.M.Ostwalt, E,E,Robertson, W.W, Thompson, Irvin Steele, J.A,Padgett, W,L.Benfield, R,C,.MeConnell, J.J,Clendenin, L,.L.MeCoy, D.N.MeLelland, J.E,Brookshire, R.L. Watts, W.A.Watts, WM, Caldwell, L,A,Beaver, E,A.Massey, Herman Wallace, C,A,Litten, C,W.Millsaps, J.R. Murdock, T.M,Stikeleather, R.P.Sumers, B.F,5e1l, and C,.L.Sherrill,. The following named jurors were returned by the Sheriff, "Could not be found," to-wit: -J.E,Brookshire. The following jurors were excused for the Term, on account of sickness, etc,, to-wit: J,M,Godfrey, L.A. eaver, and Herman “allace. The followin good and lawful men were dram and sworn as GRAND JURORS for the Term, to-wit: J.A. Tatum, R.C,lieConnell, R.P.Summers, J.J. Clendenin, J.R.Murdock, L.W.Hix, M.K.Brom, A.H,Reece, W.A.Watte, Tells | Stikeleather, C,L.Sherrill, R,A,otimson, W,W, Thompson, Avery L,. Brawley, | R.L,Wetts, J.A,Padgett, H.C,Dellinger, D.N,McLellend. J.A. Tatum was sworn as Foreman of the Grand Jury. i | 0.B.Lazenby was sworn as Officer of the Grand Jury. The following good and lawful men were sworn as Pettit jurors, for the First week, to-wit:- R.P,Holmes, P.M,Ostwalt, E.E,Robertson, Irvin Steele, W.L.Benfield, L.L.MeCoy, W.M,.Caldwell, E.A.Massey, C,A.Litten ae C.W.Miliseps, B.F.Bell, G.3.White, and R.S.feller. Noe z State vs David Gaither No. 2 State vs Robert Woodward Bill Bernhardt Boise Conner No. 11 State Tal Sherrill | | | | No, 135 State vs Joe Cook Tuesday, August 2nd., 1921", A.W.D.W. Nol Pros With Leave, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Alias Capias, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR. Instanta Capias, TOO SHOV GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendent appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Defendant appeared and showed good behavior. It is ordered that the defendant be discharged, <I Sh I TATION CONTR ARV HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY Goes ee ee a GC. Cet Continued, TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendant appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order. AN OFFICER. Alias Capias. EAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO A.W.D.W. Altes Caplas,. RETAILING LIQUOR, Alias Caples. Noe 14 State vs N,A,Reneger No. 15 State vs Gaither Foster R,C.Miller No. 16 State vs Floyd Press No. 17 State vs Fred Crouse Ea Crist No, 18 State vs Block Dalton No. 19 State vs T, J,Cagle No. 20 State vs Lewis Moore No, 22 State vs ft Thomas 0 wens No, 22 State vs L,H. Hoover No, 24 State vs | Gaston Albea | No, 28 | State vs Dock Lynch No, 29 State vs Will Bass Tuesday, August 2nd,, 1921, TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendant appeared and showed’ good behavior, Continued under former order NAA arnt 7 vey ITAD TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR Y “ach of the defendants called and failed. udgment Nisi Sci Fa and Captas, . A T T ARDOUONG DIL PL lia, UAT INL Yapias as to each HQHSEsBREANI if AARCENY & RECEIVING, TOO SHOW GOOD BEH Defendant appeared and showed. good behavidérs. Continued under former order, Cunt ANAD RITA AT SHO we WOOD BEHAVIOR, 9 00 Defendant appeared and showed good behavior, vy) + ontinued under former order, TOO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. Defendant appeared and showed good behavior, Continued under former order, LARCENY & RECEIVING, Defendant plead not guilty. It is ordered by the Court’ that the jurors be withdrawn and a’ mistrial taken, Defendant discharged in this case, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR. Abated on eaccount of death of defendant, SELLING LIQUOR. Alias Capias, No, 32 State vs Grover I. Smith No, 41 Sta te VS Roy Nicholson Cooper Holland Nog 4141/2 State V8 Eli Privette No, 42 State vs Ba Y“aither No, 43 State vs H.A, Wooten No, 44 State vs Tom Poteat Joe MoRary Tuesday, August 2nd., 1921, SELLING LIQUOR, Continued, TO SHOW GooD BEHAVIOR, Defendant called and failed, Judgment Nist Pa and Capias, Instenta Set Fa and Cepias, PORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY Defendant called anc led, Fa and Capias, Judgment Misi AVING CONTRARY To LAW, efendant callled ana failed, "a and Capias, he the o ite efendant called and failed, Judgment Nisi Set ry 7 (t & and Yapias, C.C.W, ae + f . _—< pleads not guilty, > * verdict say they find the’ defendant guilty of ) j 0 4 } I ( of indictment, AVING T THAD ¢ TAT T AN AVLNG | L WUT / Lath Liliise Nol Pros » 28 to each defendant, Ay MAVING LIQUOR FoR SALE, Defendant Called and failed, ‘a and Yepias, Instanta Set Pa and Caplas, AISTURBING SCHOOL ENTERTAINMENT. “efendant enters plea of guilty. continued upon payment of cost and during good behavior, Capias to issue at any time within two years if defendant is found intoxicated, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, Alias Captas, HAVING LIQUOR CONTRARY TO LAW, Judgment Nis4 Set Judgment Nisi Sel The following Jurors} R.P, Holmes, F,M,Ostwalt, E.E,Robertson, Irvin Steéle, «ol,Benfield, L,L.MeCoy, “oM,Caldwell, 2, A, lVeaseey, C.,A,Litton, C.Vi.Millsaps, B,F,Bell snd G.B, White, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their ’ Carrying Concealed Weapon, as charged in the bill Prayer for judgment , Defendant Joe MeRary called and failed, Judgment Nisi Set Pa ana aplas, defendant McRary re-news bond within 30 days. Continued as to Tom Poteat, Forfeiture striken out - i | i No. 45 State vs Espie Dishman No. 47 State vs Pleke Holland No, 57 State v8 George A, Canady Forest Ballard No. 5&2 State vs James ygrrisp Rome f ) { 4 Hugh Bailey { Charlie “att Pie dnmnonr tensa, Camden Lackey { Otis Carson { W111 Lackey { W111 Tiee { Vitliie Mae MeLellana} No, 55 State V8 “eke Moore Jim Watt No, 64 State vs | Walter teston Tuesday, August 2nd., 1921, TRANSPORTING LIQUO! Alias Captas, HAVING LIQUOR For SALE, “efendant pleads not guilty, Jury No, 2 after being duly sworn an empannélled for their verdict Say they find the defendant nog guilty, LARCENY AND HECHIVING, “ach of the defendants enter a plea of guilty of ‘“eceiving stolen property, It is ordered and adjudred by the Court that the defendant Seorre ‘Canady be confined in the common jail of Iredel} County for term of Tio years and to be assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said period, It 1s ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant Forest Ballard b confined in the ec mon f County for a term of Tio years and the Public Roads of Said 6h Balley and Willie Mae ‘endants ¥y moO LL ( Pru. sy @ / fendants James Morrison, Rome Lippe oraxise 1) aekatnetrree, Sornden “nckey, Otis erson, , ackey, and Will Tice, enter a plea of guilty ' oo GimemaR 3 Ad BOD» It 1s ordered ang adjudged by the Court that Judgment be continued upon payment of cost and during good behavior for TWO years, And further each to pay his pro rato of the cost, ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, “ach of the defendants enter a plea of guilty, It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that of the defendants pay a fine of 15,00 each and one-half Gt cost each, ASSAULT, ; “efendant caliod and failed, Judgment Nist Set Fa and ‘apias, Instanta Sed Fa and Vaptias, This Honorable Court takes o recess until Wednesday morning, August 3rd,, 1921, at 9:30 ofelock, A This Honorable Court convened at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, Wednesday August Srd,, 1921, for the dispatch of business, ’ No, 58 State { vs { Dewey Bost { Paul Rooks \ Arthur Aldridge { ) 0 § No. 59 State ‘ vs 4 Dewey Bost { Paul Rooks 4 “rthur Aldridge 4 No. 60 State t vs { Dewey Bost ) Paul Réoks } ‘ythur Aldridge { ) ) } { No, 61 State { vs § Dewey Bost { aul Rooks { Arthur Aldridge } Q { A v { { North Carolina, § Iredell County }} co. State of North Carolina va VS. ‘ethur Aldridge, Paul Rooks and Yewey Bost It appearing to the Court that the Sheriff found upon the persons of the defendants the Sum of 391,00, which was theemoney of the prosecutor, | ¢ “anes Norman, and that he paid said Yames Norman $5,00 of said amount, leaving the sum of 386,00, It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that the Sheriff re-fund# Wednesday, August Srd,, 1921, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendants Yewey Bost, Paul Rooks, Arty, ve Aldridge each enter a plea of cute eee in bill of indictment, 4 ™ d It. is adjudged and ordered by the Court that the defendants, and each of teem, bé imprisoned in the State Prison at Raleigh; N.C, at hard labor for a term of Five years, CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, The defendants, “ewey Bost, Paul Rooks, and Arthur Aldridge enter a plea of gullty of carrying Concealed Yeapon as charged in the bill of indictment, Consolidated for judgment with No. 60, HIGHWAY ROBBERY, The defendants, Dewey Bost, Paul Rooks and Arthur Aldridge enter a plea of guilty of Hugh-iay Robbery as cherpged in the bill of indictment, It is adjudged and ordered by the Court that the defendants, and each of them be imprisoned in the State ‘rison at Raleigh, N.C, for a term of TEN YEARS at hard labor.’ Sentences to teke effect at end of sentence in No, 58, . ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON WITH INTENT To KILL, The defendants Dewey Bost, Paul Rooks and Arthur Aldridge enter a plea of guilty of an Assault With Deadly Weapon, With Intent to Kill as charged in bill of indictment, It is adjudged and ordered by the Court that the defendants, and each of them be imprisoned in the State prison at Raleigh, N.C, at hard lebor for a term of PIVE YEARS, Sentence to take effect at end of sentence No, 60, In the Superior Court, August Term, 1921, t | Order of Court, 4 Hon, P,A,MeHlroy, Judge Presiding. James Norman 486,00, and that the cost incident to the arrést of the def ants be taxed by the Clerk of this Court against the County of Iredell that the Sheriff furnish an itemized account of said amount to the Cle P.A,McElro : Judge PrestaIng, No, 40 State vs Charlie Hix { ’ t ' { ; f ‘ { : North Carolina,} Iredell County. § State of North Carolina, VS. Charlie Hicks The defendant having agreed to the verdic entered in this case, P cost and upon surrender line running from the black Gum corner through the ‘hit Sourwood corner, or the cut down by defendant, No, 54 State vs “(,B, Arthurs G,W, Earnhardt Se ME RE MS pS ne <> > net No. 32 State vs Sam Holmes No, 70 State vs Charles Goble a No, 71 State vs Charles Goble ME SK se ma es pate KS pe ) REMOVING LANDsMARK. The defendant Charles Hix entems a plea of guilty of Removing Land-Mark as charged in bill of indictment, 2 for judgment is continued upon payne ORE oP surrender of possession of the land in dispute, being the line runnong from the Black Gum corner through the wnite Oaks to the Sourwood corner, or the place Where the sourwood corner wes located, and cut down by the defendant, In the Superior Court, August Term, 1921, t of guilty being rayer for judgment is continuec of possession of the lend in dispute, being the ée Oaks to the i, upon payment of > was located, and place where the Sourwood corner P,A, McElroy Judge rresiding, RANSPORTING AND RECEIVING, LIQUOR, The defendants and each of them for himself througt his counsel waives Binding of bill and enters a plea of guilty of TRANSPORTING AND RECEIVING EXRER LIQUOR, more than one quart at one time, It is adjudged and ordered by the Court that as to the defendant N.BeaArthurs, prayer for judgment continued upon payment of One-half of the cost and during good behavior, A It is adjudged and ordered bynthehéourt that the defendant G,.\W,Earnhardt pay a fine of $50.00 and one-half of the coSt in this action, and all the costs of storing the car of lNirs, Arthurs, o“- My FORNIFICATION AND ADULTRY. Continued for the State, Forfeiture heretofore entered against defendant tp be striken out when 1 i gives new bond, Af, (0 ¢ fA: MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, ; Defendant enters plea of Nola Contender, Consolidated f6r judgment with No. 71, SELLING LIQUOR, Defendant enters a plea of guilty of having oe . for sale and receiving, eee de wddudged and ordered by the Court that the defendant Charles Goble be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE MONTHS, without felon stripes, and assigned to work on the Public Roads of seid county for said period, No, 49 State vs J.D, Rogers This tugust 4th., z 92] a | Wednesday, August Srd., 1921, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, The defendant through his counsel waives the finds of bill and enters a plea of guilty of Forceable ™' Trespass, Prayer for Judgment continued upon payment of cost and to appear at November behavior, $200, bond required, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. , pe A Judge Presiding,” Term, 1921 ana good Honorable Court takes a recess until Vednes day morning, a eZ el theta - / f / WJ Thursdsyy, August 4th,, 1922, This Honorable Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M., August 4th., 1921, for the dispatch of business, No, 35 State vs W,V. Ireland MTANTIDA Amr Wl TTMtAYp MANUPACTURIN Yeas UO ° Defendant pleads not guilty, Jury No, 2 after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict after several hours of meditation report the the Court that they are unable to render a verdict, It is ordered by the Court that the jury be withdrawn ond a mistr aken, Continued to Novemnoer term, 1921, State vs -&.R. Continued for Frank Long (Col) No, 62 State vs Lon E, Steelman MRAMADHAOMTITA ARTIS LelabeLatoe rns : AHANOPORTING AND RECEIVING LIQUOR, Defendant enters a plea of guilty of Transporting and eceliving Liquor, It is adjudged ond ordered by the Court that defendant pay a fine of $150.00 and cost of this action, It is furtl adjudged end ordered by the Court that the defendant*s Automobile be forfeitured on condition that if he pay the sum of $100, then said Car to be released te shnta déeferidant,. > har 2 . No. 66 State TRANSPORTING AND RECHIVING LIQUOR, vs : Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No. 1 after being Floyd Beaver duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of Transporting’ and Neceiving Liquor as charged in the bill of indictment H.B.MeLelland witness for the State, called ond fatled, Judgment Nisi Sei Fa, It is adjudged and ordered by the Court that the Said H.B.MeLelland*pay a fine of $80.00, No e 52 State vs G.C, Lambert TRANSPORTING AND RECEIVING LIQUOR, Defendant enters a plea of suLllty of Receiving more than one quart of spirituous liquors, Prayer for judgment continued to Novemebr term, 1921, upon payment of cost and giving bond in’*sum of $250, to appear at sbid term and give name of person from whom he bought his liquor and abide further orders of) théoCourt, OE pak MEDS EE I ee State OPERATING AUTO WITHOUT LICENSE, V8 6 Yefendagt called and failed, Judgment Nist Set WW, “arter Fa and Yapias, z No, 37 State MANUFACTURING LIQUOR. vs Defendant pleads not guilty. On trial and continued Jas, H. Church over to Friday Aug. 5Sth,., 1921, This Honorable Court takes a recees until Friday morning at 9:30 o'elock, A.M, August Sth., 1921, Friday, August Bth,., 1921, Tis Honorable Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M., August for the dispatch of business, fy iL an ay evervel No, 58 State vs Will MeConnaboy No, 26 State vs Roy McLellarn- | UNLAWFULLY RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING, | The defendant F.A, Campbell pleads guilty of Receiving! and Transporting liquor. Preyer for judgment continued upon payment of cost and during good pehavior. It is adyudged and rdered by the Court that the Automobile seized py the officers be forfeitured and sold required by 1am. : Capias as to D.C,Mayberry. WITH DEADLY WEAPON, tera a plea of guilty of A. | ond ordered by the Court #95,00 and cost of this a that’ defendant ction. SIMA TMIZAIT TLTCENSE AULY wii NU ICENSE. ijudged and ordered by the Court that Defendant Fine of 610,00 and cost as taxed by the Clerk, | further ordered that forfeiture neretofore made! riken out. SP ANITTO MTT Didi Ue 2S am» wae Continued OADT VW T ASSAULT WITH DEADLI WEAPON, Defendant enters a plea of guilty. It is adjudged and ordered by the Court that judgment be suspended upon payment of cost, Forfeiture weretofore made is ordered to be striken out, when cost is paid. ares ARID THR - eAttTAT ata a LIQUOR, Defendant pleads not guilty. Jury No. + 2 sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find the defendant not guilty. < {z mays BV vse HAVING LIQUOR NTRAR TO LAW. . Defendant 52 of guilty of Transporting and Receiving unienfully. Prayer for judgmen’ continued on payment of cost and giving pond in 84 of 8200, to appear at November Term, 1921. Forfeiture hneretofere made to be striken out when cost is paid, * LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Defendant pleads guilty. It is adju by the Court that tne def common jail of Iredell County for end to be assigned to tne Public Roads © for said period, Not to wear Felon stripese nfined in the six W LARCENY AND RECEIVING. — 4 Nol Pros With Leave, ( aged and ordered | Noe S1 State vs Grover L, Smith No, -50 State vs N,C, Sherrill SCI FA DOCKET, NOe State vs Early Moose 6. 2 State vs Jas, H, Church Noe 5 State vs — Chas, Goble No. 66 | State vs | Floyd Beaver No « 36 | State | v8 | “arly Moose Friday, August Sth., 1921, UNLAWFULLY RECEIVING AND TRANSPORTING LIQUOR. Defendant enters a plea of guilty. It heaving been suggested to the Court both by the S@licitor for the State and counsel for the defendant that the said defendant is an inebriate. Cah opgeredyby the Court that prayer’for judgment in til the November term of Court, end the defendant be required to give bond in the sum of “1000, for his appearance at said term to show that he has been of good behavior end hes abstained from violation of the prohibition law, This course is taken by the Court in order that the matter as to his being inebriate may pe investigated by the Clerk of the Court in the mean time, and if the defendant is so found that he may be committed to the State Hospital as provided by lav. Slemander County. CR Toray MW) ANTE Wt I } odd Lv PAN Ldiad de ordered that Sei Fa be discharged on payment t 4s I cost of Sel “as is ordered that 5 a be discharged on payment cost of Set Tt is ordered that Judgment Absolute of $300, egainst defendant and sureties, P.o, Stewart and R.L.Mock, of which $150. hes already been paid. It is further ordered that the $150. which has not been paid be discharged and that judgment be merked satisfied. ¢ TRANSPORTING AND RECEIVING LIQUOR. It is adjudged and ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in the-common jail of Iredell County for a term of Six (6) MONTHS without felon stripes and to be assigned to work on the Public Roads of said county for said period. CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPON, It is adjudged and ordered by the Court thet defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS with leave to County Commissioners to hire out after the said defendant has served 90 days in jail. a Fridey, August 5th,, 1921, a Friday, August 5th,, 1921, | No.74 Ww, Jd, Matheson By consent continued to next term. Time state allowed to file pleadings. | vs | p,cC,Morrow Coit Stewart dur, of Carl Case continued by consent, Time allowed | No. 75 o to such of defendants as have been served | State to file answer. | vs Hal Brown No. 76 State Continued, | os Roscoe Holman No. 77 State ; 3 | s Selling Liquor, Continued | _ > : Will H,Souther stéte T iM vs to Troy Mitchell. a P ™ as to ~eonard lenegar. Boon Turner ferdin Lazenby SS No, 80 d, Forfeiture to be striken out if | State | lay vs thin ten days ox Stamey Jolly Glenn Millsaps Joe Jolly Ell Millsaps i A Wie De We Continu nevied e . art i Wo bond is re NTT ADULTRY3 Continued. i i ; No, 81 State vs Grady Jorden and Selling Liquor. Deft. Né, 82 State vs ewis Holler ATAD DROTTTN Defendant called anc den N fo. 83 5, fn 2 C 9 Fon) ana LaDpilas ° State vs Lewis Holler JR O BUILDING. No. 84 Spencer “alt I a true dill. State Reece H ; a Dock Ayers Car Tm LIQUOR FOR SALE. \ Consolidated with No, 65 as to Campbell Capias as to D,C.Mayberry. .C, Mayberry Friday, August 5th., 1921, SUPERIOR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY: Judge, P,A,McElroy, Judge Presiding, We the Grand Jurors for the August Term of Iredell Superior 1921, beg Leave to submit the following report: netting ca We have passed upon all bills sent us by the Solicitor and made | of the same to the Court, | We visited the jail and find ten white prisoners (nine men and + one women), one of the above prisoners is insene; We also find two colored male prisoners, The general Sanitery condition of the jail is bad, We | recommend that plumbing system be overhauled and new bedding supplied where needed, “w@ visited the cehin gang by Committee, We found at the camp y prisoners; nine white and eleven colored, The prisoners on being that they are well cared for and the fare is Satisfactory, ight mules apparently in €00da order and premises well kept, € recommends better facilities for feeding the prisoners, they | Stend while eating. We think that benches, tables and cups be) } 0 hey may be more comfortable during their rest hour, County Home by committee and found thirty-eight end Ninteen white Femal S; Seven { Five colored femal The buildingsand Sroundg in good sha é } gestioned the inmates as to their) the keeper, } well fed with good and holesome | } our body investigated the several offices of the the records properly kept as best they could judge. the floor in the vault in the Register of Deed's office | more liberal supply of cuspidors be rrovided which we der the sanitary conditions of the Court House better and 6htly. We ere informed that the attention of the Court been called heretofore to the lack of ventilation in the Grand Jury room. We find it very uncomfortable for lack of proper ventilation end recommend that Something be done to vr medy this conéition, Respectfully submitted, Jy Ba Tatum Foreman, PEE: kaing, Judge Presiding, / In the Superior Court, August Term, 1291, Monday, August Sth,, 1921, North Cerolina, | August Term, 1921, Iredell Cpunty, § Second week, This Honorable’ Court convened at 10:00 o'clock, 8th., 1921, for the dispatch of business, His Honor, P.A.McELroy, Judge Presiding, M,P,Alexander, the Hoch Sherier 4 ¥ she De eh C a'9 ft noen sheriff of Iredell County, North Carolina returned into open Court the nemes of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the of this term, toewit: C.S,Bass, S,G,Caudell, J.F,"atton, D. a. curs Y, J.L.Ervin, WS, Reid, C,W,Hoover, C.L.Furr, wWeW.Melchor, 7.1 sta T.G, Wallace, WL, Moore, m C.L,Furr was returned " could not be found," § Continued, To be 4+ 4iC AU Continued, P.B,Kenned and H.C, Hunter} No. 2 llerchants and Farmers Bank of Mooresville, N.ch§ vs, j Continued D,A.Beam and L.A.Beam { No, 21 Statesville Lumber Co, vs, Continued, C,H. Knox Monday, August, 8th., 1921, Monday, August 8th., 1921, No, 55 C,A,Stewart, Admr, j ; i j | ° Continued, | Miller Mfg. Co, . i ‘ Continued, | No. 86 | Normandie Co, vs, Neal-Plott Gro, Co, No, 58 C.L.Beaver O W.eL.Moore Continued, Noe 65 J,E,Critz, Admr, VS, Esther Horn Critz, Admz, No. 65 Carolina Motor Co, VS. Continued, Continued N.V.Long Lumber Co, semoved Continued weve Stevenson q7O Ve Stevenson No, 84 Ay ise Al dridge VS, Continued, Huphe Aldridge Continued, No, 85 Birdie Crawford Vs, Jim Cranford CRIMINAL DOCKET, Ho, 15 State TO SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR, Vs Defendants appeared and showed good Gaither Foster behavior, Continued under former order, R iM Forfeiture he? fore mad Le Continued, and time allowed pt RC, Miller “orfeiture heretofore made striken out, ale ae pleadings, Hutton & Bourhénnais Co, | No, 79 State MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, a as Vs, Continued as to J, Len Ingram and L.Mance Bost, | J,Len Ingram Caplas as to Bud Ingram, A,T,Rinehardt, Admn, { | fad Ingram ; *s Mance Bost Vs, { Continued, by consent, This Honorable Court takes recess until Tuesday, August 9th., Mooresville Cotton Milis Co, § 1921, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, i Tuesday, August 9th., 1921. This Honorable Court convened Tuesday, August 9th., 1921, at 9:30 o'clock, au. for the dispatch of business. Tm vi Reid, {.W.eMelchor,'W.L.Moore, S,.L, Tomlin, S.C, Caudill, I,L.Ervin, C,W,Hoover, d.P,Ostwalt, wT Sherrill and 7,.C,Savin, after being duly sworn and empannelled for their verdict say they find verdick and issues as follows: me following jurors; c.S.Bass, D.A.Guffey, WS, I,L.Sherrill j VS. TSSUES, B.M.Wilhelm 4 Ist, Did the late WoW. Wilhelm agree, at or nefore taking title, to purchase end hold the lands in controversy for the plaintiff until plaintiff snould repay him the money advanced and then’to convey said lands to plaintiff as alleged in the complaint ? | mawer, YeSe Ond,Did plaintiff repay said W,W, Wilhelm the money advanced in the purchase of said land as alleged | in the complaint ? Answer, Y@S- snq, Was said land allotted to the defendant as one of the heirs at law of said Ww. W,. Wilhelm in the division of said estate as alleged in the compalint ? r, Yes, Te the defendant the owner and entitled possession of the lands deseribed in the complaint ? pnswer. the ‘ch i \ the rents from said lands | | | Caveat} | The following jurors; W D,MeLelland, Jase bs Wilhollond, T.G,"allace, W.H.H.Gregory,s H.R, Mayes ,H.Renegar, John Moore, C,S. Wilson, C.A, Bass, oP Leckie, %.P.white and R,P,Little, attr being duly sworn and empennelled for their verdict sey they find the verdict and issues 4s follows: Nobbh Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | August Term, 1921. In Re: Cyrus Dacons, Caveat. Before Judge P.A, McElroy and a jurye ISSUES. = 1st, Was Thalus “scons incompetent from want of anders tendingelll manage his own affairs at the time of the death of his father in 1907, @ did he so continue until the time of his death, pugust 27thes 1917 7 Answer; Yes, 2nd. ‘iias Finley Dacons laboring under any disabilities at the time of Bhe death of his father an 1907 ? oneness) No, f 3rd, Have more than seven years elapsed since the probate 0° | will of Cyrus Dacons in common from before the Clerk before the filing of the caveat in this case ? Answer; Y6S, 4th, Did Cyrus Dacons, at the time of the’ execution of said writing purporting to be the will, to-wit: April 9the, 1903, have sufft mental capacity to execute the same ? Answer; No, eof) 5th, Is the paper writt ropounded, and eve art ther last will and testament of Cyrus Beoons * ue On Answer; No, | 5 0 Px Tuesday, August 9th,, 1921, No, 84 State vs Hallie Bennett FORCEABLE TRESPASS { TRESPASS, } The defendant through his counsel comes into Court § waives finding of bill for Forceable Trespass and § enters a plea of guilty. : \ It is, adjudged and ordered by the Court that } the defendant be confined in the common jail of 4 Iredell County for a term of TWO (2) YEARS, not to wear felon stripes, and assigned to work on aatA the public Roads of county for said period, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday, August 10th., 1921, at 9:50 o'clock, euage rresidinge North Carolina, Tredell County. This memorandum of agreement amde end entered into this the third day of August, 1921, by and between Charley Hicks and 1,3,keller both of Tredell County and State of North Cerolina, VITNESSETH: That whereas, Charley Hicks has this day plead guilty to removing a landmark, to-wit: 2 sourwood corner dividing the lands of the said Hicks and Keller, and whereas the said Hicks has egreed and does hereby agree that the point where the Sourtiood cut by him stood 4s a true corner, and that the line from the Gum through the marked white Oak to the point where the sourwood formerly stooca was d'is the true dividing line between his end the keller land at these po ne further agrees that he will surrender the immediate possess Keller of the land up to ghis line and the points herein indi s further agreed that T,.H.Sloan and R.D.Goodin are to place & S } joint where the Scurwood herein before referred to fobmerly stood & e at the Gum corner herein referred to, and said points are to be and remain the true corner end the line from these points along the marked 1] hereinbefore set forth is to be and remain the true dividing 1 n the lands of the said Hicks and feller. The said Sloan and Goodin bre to enter upon this agreement the fact that they have planted stone corners at the points herein designated and agreed to, date and sign the same, which entry when so made is to form a part of this agreement and become a part of the record. In Witness whereof, the parties hereunto have set their hands end seals the day and year above written. Charley Hicks (SEAL) RyTKelter ___? (SBAL) WITNESS: Zeb, V. Long | North Carolina, Iredell County. We, RD, Goodin arid T,H.Sloan, hereby certify that we went upon the lands as set out in the agreement of Charlie Hicks and A,3.Meller and put a stone corner where the Sourwood formerly stood, and also put a stone corner at the place where the Gum formerly stood. ,, 1902. This August 6the» R,D, Goodin (SEAL). T.H, Sloan °‘''' (SEAL) WITNESS : J. ti, Sharpe lune Pp e - . s ‘ This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday, Augyst LOthe, 1921, at 9:30, o'clock, All. Wednesday, August 10th., 1921. This Honorable Court convened W at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. Continued, Director 4 - LWEaYS Continued. Continued, n Aantinwed ContLnNuEede Continued. l ATA D Legis S ig SIX MONTHS on the publ Tis Honorable Court takes a re at 9:30 o'clock, A.M. edneaday, August 10th., 1921, for the dispatch of business. ORTING AND RECEIVING LIQUOR. : adjudged and ordered by the Court that the 1 Beaver sentence in this case be reduced from RIGHT months 4¢ Roads of tpedell County. sess until Thursday, AU GAM Judge Presiding. gust Lith Thurs day ’ Augus t lith., 1921, " j 3 This Honoreble Court convened Thursday, August 11th., 1921, at 9:50 o'clock, A.M r the No. 27 Mrs, S.2.Fesperman, et al, VS... Merchants & Farmers Bank Mooresville, N.C. NS, 25 statesville Bumber Co, VS. R,M, Current No. 86 Nelia MeIntire VS. ~ - “0 L,&.MeiIntire No. 41 Statesville Lumber Co. VSe W.L. Moore No. 49 A.C. Swmit wTrO Vide Carl Garner No, 27 North Geroline,| Tred@ll County. Mrs, S,1,Fesperman, — Vity Merchants & Farmers of Mooresville, 1.0 In the entitled cas on the grounds that their loca et this term of the court, whe in open court, through their r may be continued for the term, sccruing at this term of the ¢ dispatch of business Continued, Continued, on to be heard before lroy, Judge presiding, to the Court that the o voluntary non-suit. herefore, ordered and adjudged hat the plaintiff be non- he cost of this action. Continuance, moves for a continuance, 7,C.Linn, cannot be present reupon the parties, plaintiffs and defendant espective attorneys, agree that said case upon the plaintiffs paying all the cost ourt, which cost shell not be re-taxed at any time against the defendant, . It is, therefore, or at this term, in the above ent and their bonds, and that they (of this Court, and that said ¢ It is further ordere term, be not hereafter at any cause, nnimatter what the fina dered and adjudged that the cost accruing itled case , be taxed against the plaintiffs pay the same into the office of the Clerk ause be continued for the term. d an the cost accruing at this time texed & the defendant in said 1 results of thas action i ae NE « P.A.Mezlro Judge seostar Thursday, August llth,., 1921. Yyr-/9 North C rolina,} In the Superior Court, Tredell County. | August Term, 1921. E.C, Lambert + TIT =—pm T AMRRR TD YELBERT LAMPE, coming on to be heard and being heard before and by j | i Judge Presiding, upon the pleadings es contained in | ) } | evidence introduced poth by plaintiff end lefendant; And | feet the E.C.-embert, is the father ond naturel embert en infant about the age of ten years, and that fit and suitable person to have the care and custody Lambert. 4t is ordered adjudged and decreed by the Court | 4 Delbert Lambert should be & s hereby J adjudged and decreed tha h d th ’ of Iredell shall deliver itmediately the said Delbert Lambert to the petitioner | couse, samber he fathe * the said Delbert Lambert. Tt is further ordered by the Court thet the said E.C,~embert shall permit his said son elbert Lambert to visit the seid Noah Lambert and his Grand mother lirs, Noah Lambert at such time as it may be convenient is proper and customary. rther ordered that the plaintiff in this action shall cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. P.A, McHlroy Tudge Presiding. Thais Honoreble Court takes a recess until Friday » pugust L2thes 9:50 o'clock, Judge Presiding. / August Term, 1921 No. 22 North Carolina, ; In the Superior Court. Iredell County. ) August Term, 1921. A. H. Cashion and wife Annie Page Cashion vs JUDGMENT. G. S. Page and wife, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Essie Page. This cause coming onto be heard at the August term, 1921, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, »efore His Honor p. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs and defend=- ants have agreed upon 4 settlement of the matters in controversy: It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court in accordance with said agreement that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover of the defendants the sun of 3189.40 said sum being the amount due the plaintiffs by the defendants under the contract and deed entered into be- tween said parties for the care and maintenance of Vary Page, said con- tract being recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County in Book, and deed being recorde d in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County in deed Book 53, page 149, and said aun of $189.40 is hereby declared to be a lien upon the {and conveyed to G. S. Page and his heirs by said con ract and deed from the 6th day of March, 1916. It is further considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that Dorman Thompson and Z- v. Long be and are hereby appointed Commissioners of this Court, and 48 said Commissi ners are hereby direéted and empowered c to sell the land coveye« to G S. Page and }:is heirs by said deed, at public auction at the Caurt house door of Iredell County, to the highe t i bidder, aftr advertisment by publishing 4 notice once a week four weeks | ished in Iredell County, said sale to be made on the | i one-third in six months and one-third | in some newspaper publ following terms: one-third in cash, in twelve months « Said commissi yners will report said sale to the next term of the Court for confirmation. It is further ordered and adjudged that @uring the life of Mary E. Page the said Dorman Thompson and Z. V- Long are here by appointed Truste¢ for the parties to this action, and the funds derived from the sale of sai august Term, 1921 veu ; ° August Term, 1981, i - | land shall be paid to said Trustees, and out of said funds said Trustees | | - Noe 29 shall payyto to the plaintiffs the amount of the judgment in this case and | | Worth Carolina, In the Superior Court. pay the costs of this action. Saia Trustees, during the life of Mary Tredell County. August Term, 1921. Eg Page, shall hold said funds in trust for the parties to this action and) ne | cood real estate mortgage and out of the income from 7. &. Morrison, shall loan same on & said funds shall pay each year to the plaintiffs in this action any amount | VS ORDER OF SURV i vie Fhat shall be due whe plaintiffs by the defendants under said contract and | w. W. Murdock et al. > Tn the event the said income from said lands shall be insufficient his cause coming on to be heard at the August Term, 1921, of before His Honol A. McElroy, the amounts due each year, then said Trustees shall have the right | the Superior Court of Iredell County, sufficient part of the principal for said purpose. Judge presiding, and it § aring to the Court thi neee ssary After the ce th of Mary E. Page, any amount remaining in the hands order to properly try said cause ave a surv mristees, after paying the ai unts due the plaintiffs by the defen> controversy: said contract and deed, shall be paid to G 5. » or his heips, It is therefore, considered and ordered by the Cou sause is retained for further orders. unty Surveyor is hereby directed to at once cause Pp. A. NcBlroy he Land in controversy t made and preps , for the use of Judge Presiding. thereon the lines of said land according Y es, and further to survey and show there- consent. ; on the lines between determined by the tit‘e deeds of each Dornan Thompson _- 7 ; : £4 - 4 Attorney tor plaiitiffs. party e T is ther ordered that aid &. 0. Lazenby ce osit said Long & Jurney 2 | J Attorney for defer Ss 5 aa , shi 50 Attorney for defe dants. this Court by the first day of /October, 1921, . a : bcm . ’ er P traeenp 4 + twmic the use of the parties to thi! action and the Court and jury in the trial of this cause. p, A. McELroy Judge Presi dinge OAXWGAIDIOSAIIWGIITIOIG AISBVICOIAA IBAIAIIIOA IWBIIISAIGOOOH ay _ ne rn oe Af N\A) sa, *y yf > , } nee @ QQBBWNODAIBVUDS MWALBBOOBICEGS! }OGCOEV2 QIOGQLAGINY ALA IX COCA Q > A OX 9300000203003 10G3@29 GGQ3G0G89 303 WB@C@GI6 QQQNI@BGBAVA%x QIWOICQVIBOIOQDr wa Vay) VIAL YX OX? ee CeeeCeecer: Oeeeeeeose ce . : ! . Superior Court North Carolina, 4 ie , Tern 92 . Tredell County. Term, 1921 J. C. Clendenin, W. © Clendenin, E. L- phifer and Grace Phifer vs ) ) ) ) ) } Ww. S. Clendenine This cause com n& to be heard at the August Term, 1921, of August Term, 1921, Superior Court of Iredell County; pefore His Honop, P. A. McElroy, Judge presiding, for judgment in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court of North Carolina as certified to the Clerk of this Court by the } h | Cler of the Supreme Court, and it ap earing to the Court that the ‘etal 1 = he | tofore rendered in this at the October, 1920 of the Superior | Caunty was oraer .d and modified and affirmed as indicated L? | therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that, with said opinion of the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs, are| fee and entitled to th ssession of the land in controve State of North Carolina, in Chambersburg Township, and described as follows, to-wit: { at a stone, 4%. * air's corner, on the bank of the branch tin the ford of the branch, below | same variation to a stake in the edge of th an : ' . — 5, G. #diseman 8 corner; thence with corner to a stone in the road near the branch, with his line South to a stump on the east | | jest with his line to a stone, Clodfelter's | line South to a pine in the 4%. Y. Hair's line; bo a post oak, near the house, Hair's comer| to a stone, Hair's corner; thence East, mitt | rontaining 110 acres, be the same more or nortior f the lands awned by grandmother of the plaintiffs in +},is actione ordered and ad } C Jv | judged that the defendant, W. 5+ cient whatsoever in said lands virtue of the deed to Grace Clendenin, John Clendenin, Clendenin, a “41Liaa G. Clendenin, and dated February 10; 1896¢ is further adjudged th t the plaintiffs recover of the defendant sf One Hundred Dollars for pent of the land in controversy» and action to be taxed 1 he Clerk of this Caurt. 4 @ IWIWS.6O@IOQOGI1B.1GIIIDSIGVSI.DMWIVDIS 30300@IGIGAIIBOBE BOD BORIS BRM OA OY ONKI AATIGIIGVIIION BW August Term, 1921. No. l North Carolina, In the Superior Cuurt. Tredell Gounty. August Tern, 19° 1. statesville +umber Company nariners tré ! under the ig cause com.ng { be heard at t! August the Superior Caurt of Iredell County, before His Honor, Pp. A. McElroy, Judce Presiding, anc it appearing to the Court that the parties action have setiled a ( ororntised the it Y in controversy: , ie oak en At the plaintiff. recover nothing | bhis sbion and that the plaintiff ana defendants each : * . } me aa rad v n \¢ Anc f = \f . } pay one-nalf 0! the court co: us axed by the Clerk, and one-half of the fees of the witnesse ubpoened by ! th plaintiff and defendants, and that x } $ crf he 4 fr } witness . g ( ned by i Qi LY UNLe the plaintiff pay the cos’ P the witnesses si L yy it and that tne defendants pay the cost! f the witnesse pypoen y them. ey “Attorne 3390 10IGQIOAX QVOBIWIBDIOOVOI A. \HIBIIIIARAA AM . * ~ * eee x rh KH rx KK A XA PALA WABAA AB YADA J a7 Y 4 AA 4 August Term, 1921. Noe 9 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ) August Term, 1921. a ry 4 JuDdDGM > 2 2 wee ee This cause coming on to be heard at the August Term, 1921, of the e Iredell C ounty, pefore His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Superior ourt oO | Presiding, 1a a jury and being heard upon the caveat filed by R. L. Dacong, Florence Bell Decons, and her husband, Bverett Bell, and Bartley Dacons Privett and her husbane H. H. Privett, and the jury hearing enasered nl } } ubmitted to them as follows: issue Lb b lst: Was Thalus Dacons incompetent, from want of understanding, | + angge his own affairs at the time of the death of his father i: 1907, | . | and didehe so tinue wntil the time of nis death, August 27th, 1917 % fAnawer: * | Finley Dacons laboring under any disabilities at the time father in 1907 ? Answer: No. 3rd: Have more than seven years elasped since the probate of the will of Cyrus Dacons in comnon form before the Clerk before the filing of this case ? Ath: Did Gyrus Dacons, at the time of the execution of said paper 1903, have sufficient writing purporting to be the will, to-wit: April 9, mental capacity to execute the same: A 7? < KT answer: NOe Ts the Baper-writing propounded, and every part thereof, tie last sill and testament of Cyrus Dacons ? 3 Answer: lo. And it being admitted th t the caveat was filec within three ye 8 after the death of Thalus Dacons. Tt is therefore, considered, ordered and adjuged by the Court t said paper-writing purporting to be the last will and testament of ©] yrus Daconse | Dacons, is not the last will and testament of the said C August Term, 1921, 1 It 18 therefore, ordered and adjudged by the court that said paper-writing| | i + oo ee a purporting to be the last wil tid testament of Cyrus Dacons is void and j e no effect as to the heirs of a i a ie al of no ef ct a Lo ne igirs of Tnalus vacons, viz: Andrew Dacons, Blla ns, Be ev Dacons Pri ae ae ih i Dacons, Bartley Dacons Privett, Florence Dacons Bell and R. L. Dacons, Bartley Dacons Privett, *lorence Dacons Bell and R. L. Dacons: and that as to said Thalus Dacons and the heirs of Thalus Dacons, viz: Andrew Dacons 7 2 <a er ie, ate rs ; Ella Dacons, Barltley Yacons Privett, Florence Dacons Bell and R. L. Daons -q itestate, and said heirs of Thalus Dacons are the said Cyrus Dacous died i ‘ ag 5 neethirda c 171 the no , . ’ : entitled to one-third of all wae prop ‘ty of the said Cyrus Dacons e It is further ordered and 1\djudged by the Court that as Finley Dacon$ Cyrus Dacons was under no disability at the tine of the eath of seven years having elapsed from his father, Cyrus Dacons, and more then the date of the probate of said purported will in common form and the fil- ing of the caveat, that Jonas Dacons, son of Finley Dacons, is barred by said lapse of tin nd that as to him s:.id paper-writing is the last will and testament of Gyrus Dacons. It is furthered ordered by the Court that the costs shall be paid two-thirds by Azel Dacons, the propounder of said paper writing purporting to be the last will and testament f Cyrus Macons, and one third by the Taveators. ee fel Judge Presid egeee) AID KAAIAIOTIIWWIIHIIIOIS BIBI Q2eBQW YOO OQWOIBIWB.IBIBVOW Nea 3/ North Carolina, In the Superior Court. ory 7 790 Iredell County. ) August Term, 1921. 0. I. Jordan, Pearl Sloan, wand husband R. N. Sloan et al JUDGMENT. Len Pepe $26 of Gud F-2% fer Lisegae A fear 5 at the Aggust Term, 1921, of VS W. A, Campbell and wife, Maggie Campbell , LG Lambert and wife, Sarah Lambert. eh ee ae a ee on to be neard This cause coming e 44s Honor, P. A. McElroy, the Superior Court of Tredell County, befor and it appearing to the Court that the plain- Judge Presiding and a jury, ntitled action have compromised @11 tiffs and defendants in the above © Sr oi sing out of the above entitled action: " . their differences: } August Term, 1921, is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the County Surveyor S. 0. Lazenby, immediately goon the premises in controversy and establish a new dividing line between the plaintiffs and the defendants in the fol. lowing manner: id 5. 0. Lazenby shall commence at the point shown on the map used in the trial of this action cesignated as number 11 and run a bina southward to the station shown on said map as number 1, So as to divide wi land in to two equal parts one on the eas % side and one on the west side the said newly run line, The surveyor shall run said dividing line ible in a straight line between the above named stations n #qual division, He shall file within a reasonable of the new dividing line together with a report of his p ‘eeCings in so Going, in the office of the Cterk of the Court and said map and the report of the Surveyor accompanying the Shall be record in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell for shall establish suitable and permanent corners an markers along said dividing line at the time of its lo ation by him aid &. 0. Lazen>y as hereinabéve viding line between the plaintiffs and the defendants, It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs are the owners in fee si) ple and entit to the immedi ‘te possession of all that part of the land in controversy that lies on the east cide of the line when established as above set forth and the defendants are the owners in fee simple and entitled to Lhe tmaediate possession of all of said land On the west side of said line when established. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs and the defendants each pay their own witnesses and one-half of the court costs, the fecs and expenses of the surveyor already incurred and to be incurred in establishing the new dividing line shall be deemed court costs and one=) half of the same paid by the plaintiffs and one-half by the defendants, P._A. MoElroye Judge Presiding. dy age 524 ht By consent, fur ) : oe Ti Ray: ey m urner ttomeys for Defendants. H.P. Grier _ sia enero ahene . Zohn A. SCott, Jr, Attorneys for Devendantsa, ve DI AK (RY BIO’ 2200@00000 "e e August Term, 1921, No. 6 North Carolinas North nay, In tt Superior Court. Tredell County, August Term 1921, JUDGMENT, Fithel This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this temm of the court before His Honor, P, A, McElroy, judge presiding, and a jury, and His Honor having submitted to the jury the issues hereinafter set out, and the jury having answered said tss is her L out, said issues and the answers hereto bein. as follows, to-wit: lst: Did the late 7%. agree, at or before taking title, to purchase and hold the lands in oohtrovever, for the plaintiffs until plaintiff shoujd repay hin the loney advanced, and then to convey said lands to plaintiff as alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes. end: Did plaintiff repay said W. ¥. Wilhelm the money advanced for purchase of lands alleged in the complaint ? Answer, Yes , Srd: Was lloted to the defendant as one of the heirs at law of said #W. W. Yilhelm in the division of said ectate as alleged in rT the somplaint ? Answer, Yes, 4th: Is defendant the owner and entitled to the possession of lands described in the complaint ? Answer, No. Sth: What is the value of the rents from said lands per year ? Answer 5 . It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the court that the Plaintiff is the omer and entitled to the possession of said lands, and that the defendant holds the legal session of said lands, and that the lands conveyed to hii in fee simple. 3, It is further considered and adjuged that .the defendant, B. M. Wil- helm, be, and he is hereby required and directed to exe@ute and deliver ta the plaintiff a deed conveying to the said plaintiff, John J. Sherrill, and his heirs and assigns, the lands mentioned and described in the complaint in this action free and discharged from all claims, encumbrances, liens demands, or title of the said #. W. Wilhelm and of all persons claiming through or tinder him, “It is further considered and adjudged that the defendant pay the Coat of this action 6 be paxed by the Clerk of this Court. August Term, 1921, No, 48 This case being on trial is continued over VS, to Saturday morning, August 13th, 1921, C.R,Miller and D,A,Miller This Honoreble Court takes a recess until Saturday, August 15th, 1921, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, North Carolina, and i husband wife, Maggie Campbell, i { : f " l wife, Sarah Lambert, TTD STYYT TT “NTTAT OT, LtY } COUN hems In obedience to en order by a judgment given in the above I went upon the bandé-in controversy, on the 18th day of and the line between the said parties, as follows: eginning at a stake, (now a Stone) marked No. 11 on the map, and running thence South 23 W, 141-3/4 poles to a stone in the Black Line about & feet South of a marked Pine, end being No, 4 on the Map, and IyGy Lambert's cor.; thence South 34 W, 1823/4 poles to a stone and stump RW Goodin's gomner, ave well marked and Stone corners planted, Respectfully submitted, Zs S'. OyLazenby, County Surveyor, to neglects to vacate and surrender the premises described in the: complaint On or before Jan. 1, 1922 2, then a writ of execution is to issue directing | Saturday, August 13th,, 1921, No. 30 K £ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, August Tern, 1921, Sarah Chambers, JUDGMEN?®, VS C. EH. Chambers, This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the court, and being heard before His Honor, P. A, McElroy, Judge presiding, and it ap- pearing to the court that the parties have compromised all matters touch- ing the ownership of the property described in _he couplaint, and of the plaintiff's right of subsistence Since the separation of the plaintiff and defendant, and prior t» Lhe defendant's securing a divorce on the following terms, to-wit: lst. That the defendant, C. H. Chambers is the owner and is entitied to the possession of the land described in the complaint. 2nd. That the plaintiff is to have the right to occupy said premises until Jan, 1, 1922, rent free, together with the right to take necessary firgwood from said premises during her said occupancy, but is to use reasonable care in outtim tire wood so as to do as little damage to the merchantable timber as may be, and is to commit no waste whatever during her occupancy. Srd. That the plaintiff is entitled to the sum of $200.00 sub- sistence neney dua by the defendant from the time of their separation up until the granting ofthe divorce hereinafter mentioned, which sum the de- fendant is to deposit in the First National Rank of Statesville on, or be- fore, Dec. 15, 1921 to the credit of H. P. Grier, local attorney for the vy Plaintiff, to be by him paid over to her upon her vacating the premises on or before Jan. 1, 1922, 4th. That the defendant is to pay the cost of this acction except the per diem of the plaintiff's witnesses, and is to take a non suit and pay the cost in the Ejectment Suit of C. H. Chambers vs Sarah Chambers, Sth. That if the defendant makes the deposit to the credit of the plaintiff's local attorney as above provided, and the plaintiff fail ‘the Sheritr of Iredell County to eject plaintiff from said premises, and . to place tne defendant in possession thereof, and after her ejection said wi. x . 8 is to pay over to her the said *200.00. H. P. Grier pay Third. Has the plaintif’ been a resident of the State for more than And it further appearing to the court that the defendant, after years next preceeding the commencement of this action ? : nr me 8 ac 1 the separation between the plaintiff and the defendant, became a citizen Answer Yes, of the state of West Virginia, and instituted an action in the Circuit Fourth. Did plaintiff have knowledge of the facts alleged as grounds for | Court of Logan County, in said state , for the purpose of securing a divorg divorce for six months before the commencement of this action ? from the plaintiff, and that said case was duly prosecuted and a decree e Answer. Yes, of divorce was granted the plaintiff in said action by said court in said county and siid state aforesaid, as alleged in defendant's answer, | North Carolina It is therefore, considered and adjudged by the court, that the ? , ) Tredell County. Superior Court, Ayes ™ 1 2 terms of compromise between the plaintiff and defendant herein aboce set Auguet Term 1021, out, be, and the same are, hereby in all respects approved and confirmed Joe Eccles, ) and adjudged binding upan and between the parties, ) ( ae woop VS ) y eee ! ) { / ) VU Tt is further considered and adjuged, that the divorce obtained Edan Eccles. by the defendant in the courst of the sate of Virginia is valid and bind- ing to the same exten! and effect as if obtainéd in the courts of this a. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the court and being state, heard before His Honor McFlroy Judge and a Jury upon the issues submitted It is further adjudged, that the clerk of this court tax the and the Jury having the issues in favor of the plaintiff. cost agreeable to the compromise above set out. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court, that the bonds By consent: of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the be and the sane are P, S. Carlton hereby dissolved, It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the H. PP. Grier by Grier Counsel for Plaintiff, Pp. McElroy costs to be taxed by the Clerk, and this judgment is to be withheld until ai “toe Presiding. R. T-. Weatherman ; and be inoperative until all costs are paid. Dorman Thompson. i P. A. McElroy Counsel for Defendant. Judge Presiding. ©.2393.30BG9GIVOIIIOUODIIOS. «BGIAIIWSOISIIAIIY AASB | @ 22.VI@W98180IG9.1008_GOI)2 QUWAE G.I. BUBWE OBIS 433 BOX JQOQE MIO QQQQQ@@B22@BAA6 JFIG@A QQQROAGR2\ JOA LD) IBIVHE me @QQOQGOO-2 SXGOQ ICDS TGOB AIK LV II DALEK GB II2 BILHLFB (Ss No. 80 No. 45 North I Carolina, Superior Court. North Carolina. ) In the Superipr Court. Iredell County, August Term 1921, ) © Iredell County. ) August Term, 1921. Joe Eccles, Statesville Lumber Company. < ‘i VS ISSUES. vs JUDGMENT, Edna Eccles, T. M. Stikeleather. First. Did the plaintirr and defeidant marry as alleged in the ¢ This cause coming on to be heard at the August Term, 1921, of Answer, Yes, : the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Second, mpl 3 Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties to this Answer, ‘ e ‘| @6tion have settled and compromised the matters in controversy in this action: It is therefore considered and adjuded by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing the action and that the defondant pay the costs to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Pp. A. McElroy. Judge Presiding. By Consent. Dorman Thompsone Pp, Grier. Attorneys for Plaintiff. T. Raymer. m™, Weatherman. Attorneys for “Defendant. DAW 0 ORBQQA ASS QD 2 (ABUL. PEEeeelce’ JOGA LERBO2 0 20.0000 18 G88QI0 (III) JID BOQ. BBBOOAID2BAGBBBOS No. 86 North Carolina. In the Superior Court. Iredell County. August Tern, 1921. Nelia McIntire, Vs JUDG MENT. MeIntire. t This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Court, pefore His Honor P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and the plaintiff having come into Court and signified her desire to take a non-suit in this action, it is hereby ordered and adiudged that this action be, and the game is nereby non-suited. Pp. A. McElroye Judge Presi dinge 392000006 BO LODIBBIBVSHOAIBIQHVVIHVSO 5GIIOVOS IEBBAE “AIO IDID I AIIGOIVO 4BSOASHO No.48 North Carolina. In the Superior Court. Iredell County. August Term, 1921. | mh, B Sigman vs 588.0 38, F fwd 2, Miller. | Ast. Did the defendants fail to comply with the conditions set forth in the deed of the plaintiff to them, dated February 19th, 1916 ? Answer. No. a uy North Carolina, Superior Court. Tredell County. August Term 1921. Sigman, plaintiff. ) ) VS ) JUDGMENT. ) ) Miller and D. A. Miller, defendants. .' This cause coming on to be heard + this term of the Court before His Honor P. A. McElroy, Judge and a Jury and being heard upon the whole record and the issue submitted and the Jury having answered the issue, "Did the defendants fail to comply with the conditions set forth in the deed of plaintiff to them, dated February 19th 1916" No. 9 Itiis therefore considered and adj dged by the Court that the defendants are the owners in fee of the lands described in the deed, subject to the conditions contained-in the deed; that the plaintiff recover nothing by reason of her suit. p. A. McElroy. “Judge Presiding. we eveee’ BOALBGIEBIOOWE GIBB XXIBIQBIBIOOIBIOEBIIIVS @@UBABWBBCAO - IAGDBODAGIIROTIEIGIIIIG I535080. 8.120 No. 66 No.59 ‘ Leonard Carter & Co., North Carolina, Superior Court. vs Tredeli County. August Term 1921. 7, A. Miller. In what amount is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff. Answer. $364.80, with interest on $360.00 from June, 24, 1920 Mrpst: Did the plaintifi and defendant marry as alleged in the complaint % Vio- ¢ Y Answer. YeS- | North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court. Second: Did the defendant separate nerself from nd abandon the plaintiff Tredell County. ) August Tern, 1921. as alleged in the Complaint. Answer. Y@Se Leoanard carter & Co., | Third. Has the plaintiff lived separate and apart from each other for more vs JUDGMENT. than five years before the commencement. of this action ? w. A. Milsers Answer. YeSe Tourth: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State for five years This cause coming on to pe heard at the August Term, 1921 of the Sup- erior. Court of Iredell County before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Pre- Answer. {ES siding and a jury and being heard, and the jury having answered the issue | | prior to the commencement of this action. | } as set out in the record: It is therefore considered , ordere: and adjudged that the plaintiff North Carolina. ) Superior Court. " recover of the defendant, i. A. Miller, the sum of $364.80 and interest Iredell County. ) August Term 1921. . a on $360.00 from June 24th, 1920, until paid, and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Ceaser Allison , Pp. A. McElroy vs Judge Presiding. Cora Allison. @QEBOCAS GBAS.DBIOIBOWIAO 978O3:2O2BE.1 0G NQWVAIO BBS 120s 19@GBCB080 93400093 3QQGBG@IBS.IAB.VS This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and AM 20.5 AOGICGIABW 2 1GAVEBS. X DOBB'S. being heard before His Honor McElroy Judge and a Jury upon the issue sub- 7 ; | Mp. WT t7 ‘ n the Superior Court. mitted and the Jury Raving found the issues in favor of the plaintiff. North Carolina, P August Termy 19 21. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court, that the bone | Iredell County. Ge ? of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the be and the same are, 4 J. M. Davis | by dissolved. It is further ordered and that the plaintiff pay the . “a | ; | to be taxed by the > . wi a until and | ne Clerk, and this judgment is to be withhel G. F. Marefield. | be inoperative until all costs are paid. endebted to the -plaintiff as alleged in the compla p. A. McElroy. Is the defendant Judge Erassenne: > Answer, ves, $400.00 and interest from May 15, 1917. Me ¥7 North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Tredell County. ' August Term, 1921. JUDGMENT. m, Barnhardt Norefield. Judgment here ofore having been rendered against the defendants than G. F. Morefield by the Clerk. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior court of Tredell County pefore His Honor P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, | and a Jury, and being heard and the jury having answered the issues as j submitted to them as follows: j } "ts the defendant indebted to the plaintiff as alleged in the com plaint ?" ’ "Answer: "yes, $400.00, and interest from May 15th, 1917." . i It is therefore ordered and and adjudged by the Court t at the plaintiff recover of the defendant G. F. Morefield, the sum of $400.00 with interest thereon at 6% per annum from May 15th, 1917 until paid, and it is further adjudged by the court that the defendant pay the costs of thi action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Superior Court. Pp. A. NeBiroy Judge Presiding. ACID COAGOBIADIWGTIBVHIBOWOABHBIAIIBITA 1900000000 QC FIIOAIOIAAAABIGIIGDIIIIIS GIGBAGIWIGHIBS. IAGOOWGR2 No 89 North Carolina Superior Courte Tredell County, Term, 1921-6 A. A. Carvwner ) ) vs ) ) ) Frank Johnston. This cause comi ng on to be heard, and being h eard at thie ta the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing to the court that the parties have adjusted their differences and that the plaintiff nas agreed to take a nqn-suit: It is therefore, adjudged by the Court that this cause be, and th sam hereby non-suited, and it is further adjudged that the plaintiff pay costs of this action. ° P, A, McElroye Judge Presiding. ‘. ¥ ., > WwW +) ) Y* s 7 yoy AAAS A PEBOM OX QO QDQO SOON a : YQERBUOLL QBICAC@@EGBE. JBVECBBOBIAUL SX 1S Seeceeveece No. 82 North Carolina. In Superior Courte Iredell County. August Term, 1921. Listers Agricultural Chemical yorks vs r L. Bradford This cause coming on to be heard Superior Court of Iredell County, before heard and it appearing thet the plain for a non suit of sai actio Tt is therefore ordered and aajuar 1 and decreed that th: plain- take a non suit bn said casc. It is further ordered that the plaintiff be charged with the of this action to be taxed | the clerk of this courte Pp. A. T (CE LPO 9 ae Judge Pres i dine fs api passant “ ~ Voy WD @E N@ ® Ik (92 j 5 QOQX OOQOT IAA XZ Yee ¢ FQ RDA SAAAM - ON ae MK XO ee 1 2HIOIADIWOWVWIIO ABIATIIOWII BOIBOLOIOANS QD DIS DAE - ee No, 48 M,B. Sigman vs C.R Miller and D, A, Miller wy The following WH H.Gregory, W,T, Sherrill, C,W,Hoover, Saturday, August 15th., 1921, jurors; 5.L. Tomlin, W.H.Renegar, W,L,Moore, C,S,Bass, T.C,.Cavin, 5.P,ostwalt, A.R,Reid, D,A, Guffey, | Ww and W,S.Reid, after being duly sworn end empannelled for their verdict say they find and answer the this book. No, 40 Charles TC jLQe John Barton Payne, Mrector General of Railroads. (Sou. Ry. Co.) Houser } { { I | ‘ " \ \ I \ ’ { | t ’ } +4 out Ac Chambers y loan. Tt is ordered by the a are continued to November Term, 1921, t 5 Bo, ol ).F Kestler ond wife, Kestler we na issues as recorded on page 551 of | This cause coming on to be heard at this term | of the Court, before His Honor, P,A, McElroy, Judge Presiding, and the plaintiff and defendant having come into Court and signified their desire to dismiss this action, It is hereby ordered and adjudged by the Court that this’ | action be, and the same is hereby dismissed, | by consent. | This cause coming to be heard at this term of Court, before His Honor, P,A,MeElroy, Judge Presiding, and the plaintiff having come into Court and signified his desire to take 4 none | suit in this action as set out in judgment én | page 527, It is hereby ordered and adjudged | that this action be, and the same is hereby non-suited, Motion for new trial for errors committed in | the trial and errors in the charge of the Court. Motion over-ruled, Exception. Judgment | signed, Exception, Defendant appeals to Supreme Court, Notice of appeal waived in open Court. Appeal bond in sum of (508 adjudged sufficient, Defendant allowed 30 day to serve case on appeal and plaintiff allowed 30 days to file exception or counter Cases | | Court that all cases not tried and compromised) This cause coming on to be heard at this term | of the Court, before His Honor, P,A,McE1roys Judie Presiding, and the olainti#f and defendant having come into Court and signified their desire to dismiss this action, It 48 hereby considered ordered end adjudged by the Court that this action be, and the seme 18 hereby dismissed by consent. It is further ordered that the defendant pay the cost of this action. JUDGMENT BEFORE CLERK?, August, 9th, 1921. North Ca Iredell County. 4 In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk. on to be heard before J,A.Hartness, co OO Tredell County, North Carolina, on this the ne same being the 2nd Mondey in this month, and appearing ea1nmm7ons summor to > 5662.00 therefore considered, ™ h interest thereon at tre rate of 6% per annum from and after payed and the cost of this action as taxed by this Teaxr Raacesaad day of August, YAQABAIAVTAGBAIAWSYITAWGSHSSIGSOO" YONNOYAYA AADAYS E,D.Brady, recover of seid defendant, Pet PODBOBAOAOSACHEBOE YQIQQOSDOVSOR the satisfaction of the Court from the records was issued in this action on the 20th day of on Monday and that 4 verified | issued and it| sfaction of the Court that the said summons was) defendant on July 20, 1921, which is more then) 1921, srd that a copy of said | at the time of the no answer has been .ppearing from the evidence factory proof of this in favor of the nat there is due the pl nterest thereon from July 2nd. 1921: i lere i adjudged by the Court S, Popes the oa ; ce J. A. Hartness Clerk Superior Court, Iredell count» North Caroline. a JUDGMENT BEFORE Y " DGMENT BEFORE CLERM, August Ststs;., L921. Worth Carolina, } im the Tredell County, | J,H.Nicholson ~-VS- yw.c,. current and W.E.Current. This cause coming on for hearing parties nave compromised their differences: that the plaintiff J,H. Nichols er of .8.Current the sum of Sept, 1lst., 1920, until pal settlement of the note 4 +4 r + mAPYaAHnID +} dissolution or the Dental Partnership be 5 as per written contract dated Sept. 1si., Superior Court, 1921, appeering that the is therefore considered defendants W.¢,Current and Dollars, with interest from full Clerk 5 By Consent: J,E.Nicholson, W.C,Current W. =. Current uperior North Carolina, Iredell County. Lain ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) coming on Superio North Carolina, Iredell County. The First National Bank of Statesville, McLain and John A. McLean. This cause coming on Signed clerk of the In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk. JUDGEMENT. to be heard and being heard before the une r Court of Tredell County States aforesaid, action upon 4 note. satisfactory proof: was issued more than ten and was returnable before (3) That verified complaint ae . said summons was issuec, and that, | defendant a phe ime of the each fort one hundrea UV ev 18th, 1921 a 6% per annum until ds Aa Hartness Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Co., North Carolina. Tn the Superior Court. Refore the Clerk. ) ) ) ) JUDGEMENT. ) to be heard and being heard pefore the Superior Court of Iredell County, state aforesaid (2) That the summons was issued more than ten days pefore the first Monday in September 1921, and was returnable before me on the first Monday in September 1921. (3) That a verified complaint was duly filed in this office at the time said summons was issued, and that a copy of said complaint was served on each defendant at the time of the service of the summons on said defendant. (4) That defendants and each of them has failed or neglected to file a verified answer, raising issue of the fact upon the matters and things alleged in the complaint on or before the second Monday in September, 1921, and that there is now due on the note sued on in this action the sum f Six Hundred and Fifty Dollars, with interest from January 4th, 1919. It is therefore, considered and adjudged by the court, that plaintiff recover of the dcofendants, VW. P. MeLain and John A. McLean, the sum of Six Hundred and Fifty Dollars, with interest thereon from Jan- vary 4th, 1919 at 6% per annum until paid, together with the cost of this action. J. A. Harhness. | ‘ Clerk of the Superior Gourt of Tredell County, N. C. AI IDGAGIGBAGIIGPOGIIGIHIO.IIW ABBGOOEBIWBEGTBBQWIA ADA I In the Superior Court. North Carolina, \ Re Clerk. Iredell County. efore the Cl The First National Bank of Mooresville, N- ©: JUDGEMENT. vs J. M. Lentz, R- V- Brawley errr and G. W. McNeely This coming on to be heard and it appearing that the summons in this cause was served more than ten days prior to the first Monday in Sept. 1921 and that the complaint was filed at the tiue of the issuance of the Summons and it further that the complaintwas duly pond and verified, on 4 promisory note and it further appearing that no answer has peen filed. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of $261.15 and interest at six per cent from Sept. 9, 1921 and the cost of this action. In the Superior Cor ° North Carolina, : si t Refore the Cle®k. Tredell Countye Rarger, J. V- Barger & Barger trading under the of Barger BroSe JUDGEMENT. Thompson ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1) his cause coming on to be heard and it appearing that sumsions in thip served on Thos. Thompson and W. C. Thompson more than ten days | first M in Sept. 1921 and it further appearing that the he time of the issuance of the summons which com- a promissary note and it further appearing that the said| verified and no answer having been filed. Fore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs recover of | + % \ nson and W. C. Thompson the sum of *1300.00 with sntapect, thereon from 25, 1921 untill paid and the cost of this a | j sept. 12, 1921. NOVY? DABDAZAALAL GATS, \ ‘to the Court from the evidence produce North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County :- o Before the Clerk Carolina Motor Company Vs Judgment, L,S-Summers, S,}i, Summers and Ola Summers This cause coming on to be heard before J.A,Hertness ,Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County,state of North Carolina,on Monday “eptember 12th,1921,and being heard,and it appearing d in this action founded on a note, and thet the summons in this action was issued more than ten days prior to the first Monday of Sept ember,1921,and that a verified complaint was filed in this office at tl he time of issuing of the summons,and that a copy of the compleint was served on the defendants,and each of them, at the time of service of the swmons,and that said defendahts,and each of hs them,are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of 500,00 and interest on same at the rate of six per cent per annum until paid from the 10th day of June 1921,and that the defendants have failed to file an answer in this cause :- It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the Plaintiff ,Carolina Motor Company ,recover of the defendants ,L.S.Summers y S.M.Summers end Ola Surmers,jointly and severally,the sum of Five Hundred afid no/100 (3500.003 dollars with interest on same at the rate of six per cent per annum from the LOth day of June,1921,until paid,and that the defendants pay the costs of this action as taxed by bhe Clerk of this court, This the 12th day of September ,1921, J,A,Hartness, Clerk of Superior Court, Iredell County. No. £4 Ot North Carolina, } Tredell County. | Henkel-Graig Live Stock Compeny, { V8. { 4 Southern Railway Company. Tis cause coming on for hearing and it appearing to the ais ~ COULYM J, Jk 4b5 Vit ~ = 4 - * ; oe ns bon ‘ ~ he aattload and compromised their Court, that the pa ties hereto have seveiec ot ae ne ve ABT 39 4fferences and that defendent te due the plaintiff the Sum of wie —— ve ” 25 “a na 5 oa. 4 a0: a a sac . with 35.16 interest from 27th day of February 1920, Total ‘j62.006 oY ~ Lop @ oe ~ we + ak Vv It is therefor recover of the defendant $62.55 and the cost of t e considered and adjudged that the plaintiff the sum of 357,59 and interest 5.16, to al 1 1 his ection, viz2, 514,00. P, A, Mchlroy witte-Préstding in the 16th Judicial Tadge T: r +a District. By Consent. ee WD, Turner y Atty for plaintir: al ‘ © Atty yr defendan LC, Caldwell’, tty for defendant. Eee Noe bikie: 7 | /A- if North Sroline, § Superior Court, North Carolina, Tredell County. 4 august Term, 1921. ‘ Superior Court. Tredell County. Aufust 27th, 1921. Stock Company, ) 4 Davis, Director General of 4 Henkel Craig Live Stock Company VS Retlroads, as Agent under Section 206 4 j Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 , tne Transporation Act of 1920 of the Tf poration f i j ) ) ) ) James C- Davis, Director Gener’.1 of ) ) ) ) ) of the Transpo rtation Act of 1920. | . | This cause coming on for nearing and it appearing: to the Court | This cause coming on for hearing and it appearing to the Court parties hereto have compromised their di rences, andthe action | | that the parties hereto have compromised their differences, and the action the co-defendant, the Southorn “ailway Company, nas been dismissed, | | against the co-defendant, the Southern Railway Company has been dismissed, further appearing that said Action against Walter D, Hines, Director) and it fubther appearing that said action against Walter D. Hines, Direct-| . ea ond James C, Yavis, Director | or General of Railroads, has also bee issed, and James C. Davis, Dir- 4 ection 206 of the Transporation ecter General of the Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 o f the Trans@ defendant in the cause, end the | portation Act of 1920, has been substituted as the defendant in the cause, have agreed to cor promise said action for one-fourth of the | and the parties hereto have agreed to compromise said action for one-fourth costs: of the amount demanded and costs: u and adjudged that Henkel-Cralg THEREFORE Jt is considered and adjudged that Henkel CraigsLive SL ” <- Mwnanannnt.a . 4 . 9 1 206 of the Transporation Act of 1920, of Railroads, as Agent | under Section 206 of the transportation Act ol 1920 - : : + fwor bh of Ff ayy 92 ai 1920, to-wit: the sum of $55.00, with interest from the «/tA of February, 1920, to-wit 3 } | } } | { | defendat, James C,Devis, Director General Stock Company, recover of its defendant, Janes ©. Davis Director General | | | | 44.95, total 459.95, and cost of action, to-wit: 514.00. * ane P Af MOT roYy ~ Somn = é I Judge . Presiding in the 16th Judicial District. Tadee : <i the Lot t Tud ic Consent: Att'y for Plaintiff. W. D. Turner _ eel f\ +t £ > > i¢ L. Cc. Caldwell 5g Att'y s0F Defendant. a ® OIGO DO sg@2B0BRAEADIIORAIDAILIIII SD @ad00. 0% x aac 300003000080 XXHAOHGWSSIW J ms 1b North Carolina, Superior Court. } 1 A et 3 ¢ Tredell County. ugust 27th, 1921. North Carolina, +s is ce Tredell County Before the Clerk. Henkel Craig Live Stock Company VS R. V. Brawley and P. P. Dulin, vé James Ce Davis, Director General JUDGMENT. " vm. A. Cavin and I. G. Cav of Railroads, as Agent under section . . , in. ee of the Transportation Act of 1920 of the I ° This cause coming on to be heard befé6re the undersigned Clerk of the Court and being hearc on the second !‘onday in August, 1921, the same peing the 8th day of August, 1921, and it appearing to the court that the summons in this action was issued more than ten days prior to the first Monday in August, and that this is an action upon 4 note secured by real estate mortgage, and is for the purchase money of land; and that ee pp es ee a Se atte the amount herein due is definite and fixed; and that the plaintiffs co-defendant, the So thern Railway Comoany, has been | duly filed a verified complaint at the time the summons inthis action was issued: and that a copy of said complaint was served on the defend- ants with the summons: and it further appearing to the court that the defendants have not filed any answer to said complaint raising any issue of facts upon the matters and things stated in said couplaint on or be- fore the second Monday in August: This cause coming ee on for aring § t appearing to the parties hereto have compromised their differences, and the uther appearing that said action against Walter D. Hine _ peen dismissed, and James ©. Davis, under Section 206 of the Transpor- It is therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs, R.- v. Brawley and P. P. Dulin, recover of the defendants, °. A. Cavin and . I. G- Cavin, the sum of $13,000, with interest thereon at six per cent for on6-fGie™ from the 15th day of April, 1920 until pad: and that said judgement 1s a lien on the land conveyed by I. G. Cavin and I’. C. Cavin to secure said indebtedness. It is further ordere« and adjudged that the mort= - Me ty ie gage deed given by the said !’. A. and Tt. G Cavin to secure said indebt- considered and adjudged that Henkel Crag edness, be foreclosed and the lands sold, and to that end, John A. Scott, ; Jr., be and he is hereby appointed a commissioner to sell said land de- ecover of its defendant, James C. Davis Director of scribed in said mortgage deed, at public auction at the court house door of Iredell County, to the highest bidder for cash and convey the sauie igent under Section 206 of the Transportation Att to the puchaser in fee simple, first advertising the same for thirty days in some newspaper published in Iredell County, and by posting 4 20.00, with interest from 27th day of February, 1920 notice of said sale at the court house door of Iredell County. It is A . further ordered and adjudged that he sell the same on Thursday the 8th cost of action, to-witt 7146006 day of September, 1921, at 12 o'clock noon, and out of the proceeds of said sale pay the cost of this action and apply the balance, 80 far as it will go, to the satisfaction of this judgemcnt and pay any surplus to M. A. and 1. G. Caviny Said commissioner shall report his pro- the cause, ceedings to the court within ten days after the date of sale. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of Court. N. D. Turner _Att'y for Plaintiff. ce It is furthered ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs, P. B. Caldwell _Att'y for Defendant. Dulin and R. V. Brawley, oF either of them be and they are hereby autho- ized to bid at said gale and purchase the land. This cause is retained for fubther orders. Joo Aen chert Q2QGIB.ABEGICAIIIOSPEIIIGIIOS. 3069) Cierk of Superior Court. DCR A@IAI@IOOCGAROOABOCBABBY fs / 4. Aug. 8th , 1921. GBP QLEIA 9@IGWODI.3IE G@.3 BIIOSIWISIIIADIAIISIHE Monday, November 7th,, 1921’, Nona : ane wmOncay, November 7th 1921 “se') a North Carolina, | a November Term, 1921, Tredell County, |] Be it remembered that a Superior Court begtn and held in and for the county of Iredell, on the 9th Monday efter the lst Monday in No. 6 Pee : eae ; : State september, A.D, 1921, the same being the 7th day of November, 1921, when | | v8 i aan Bill Barnhardt ry PsA. McElroy, Judge presiding, is present and presiding, Ax 7 e Continue “ Hayden Clement, Solicitor, is present and prosecuting in the M.,P,Alexander the High of Iredell County, is present the following good and lawful ys) week of this term, to-wit: eB, Hili, C.A.Stewart, T.R, Alexander, 8,8, ™ ae ae Bete’ he «eD,Creedmore, So iba ~ Lipe, J.P, Gouger, R.L.Shoemaker, A,C, Joseph No, ta State ) vs { Rankin Cloaninger] No, 12 State Po ve | Boise Vonner returned by the Sheriff sick and i Nog 13 State i.i,Shoemaker, J,C. Joyner, vs T..?, Smith account age and infirmaties; men were drawn and sworn as GRAND | No, 14 kG ll } j H.Knox, J.D,Clark, R.C.Little, C.A,Stemart, J,M,Cass, W.,AjSherrill, C,W,Hoover T Cnar Ji, VOSS, Joseph Rimmur, WR. Foreman of the Grand JULY « Sworn as Officer of the Grand Jury. The folviawtiue sand docs ' p r ; ‘he following good and lawful men were sworn as Pettit Jurors a for the first week wi ‘ Dp te Wiad + 1 P 1¢ Tirst week, to-wit: C.B,Hill, W.H.Hunter, E,E,Johnston, F.A. rn ie * s Cloaninger, ay i,Lipe, J.F,Gouger, L.H, White, and P,W.Souther, No, l State VS TIA Robert tioodward HAVING LIQUOR CONTRAY TO LAW. Aldas Capias. No, 4 State vs Lal, Soekuew HAVING (LTQuor CONPRARY TO LAW, Alies Capias,. | } i } | | i { i State vs Tal Sherrill No. 15 State vs Joe Cook No, 16 State vs | N.A,Renegar | No, 17 | State i vs | Gaither Foster ' |R.C.Milier No, 18 State v8 Floyd Press Alias Captas, Continued under former order, MFG, LIQUOR. HAVING LIQUOR. CONTRARY TO LAW. Continued under former order, OPERATING AUTO RECKLESSLY, Alias Capias, Monday, November 7th., 1921. HOUSEWBREAKING, LARCENY AND RECEIVING, Nol Pros With Leave. iN TAT ~AmMr ANT RRCRTVTING LARCENY AND RECELVING, Alias Capias. as to Leonard Renegar. Troy Mitchell. Troy Mi \ AC e SELLING QUOR Alias Capias. Will H. Souther AFFRAY. Alias Capias as to Joe Jolly. No, So State vs Grady Jorden No, 54 No. 45 State vs Taammn — sae Ve Ys ney | State | Hallie Bennett | Alex Templeton | Rome Williams | Sandy Dalton | Carlee Houser +} Note Allison No. 39 State vs Prank Long et M In MONGRY , >rTOCATT appeared tid sds . t+3n5300 Continu' Nol pros "Wath Leave as to Hallie Bennetts Bach of the defendants s pleads guilty as chargede Ttois adjudged end ordered bg the Court that the defeneee ae ov Gandy Dalton and Carleé H Bag each pay . ne © poo el and oneerirth of the cost, arid phat the defendants oe taaeke Rome Williams end Note Allison each pay Alex Templeton, pr An oi . 5 AL wri ¥ of .4 1, os sach a fine of $10,00 andyone fifth cost € ‘ atv AND RECEIVING OF 4 AUTOMOBILE, Plea guilty. R i ve ng , . * . mre) adjudged and ordered by the Cotrt thet the deft. pay « fine of $25.00 and cost of this action. Deft, enters plea of guilty of Forceable Trespass. Vv A-@y 1921, WwW 3 WY Monday, November 7th Ys th., 1921, pe Tuesdey, November 8th This Honorabic Tuesday, November 8th,, No. 45 State UNLAWFULLY REt vs Deft. called plea of guilty of Simple sAssauit, me oe ey ee and ordered by the Court that Judgment nded upon payment of cost, , No, 52 State vs Joe Jolly ; a plea of guilty. It is by the Court that each of the Defta each and each to pay one-te of | No, 64 State Ul FULLY HAVING MORE T | ONE QUART OF LIQUOC ter being t say th bi OP Oe Et ee o 7 2 Vv i 4 > Yr - ”~r cen 4 x “ y S \ t eaqd ) FU. 7 ) at t iO € Lewis Moore July and e se anh ca ea ae She ee Ce ee ee 3 L eir vi fet sa Tom Hart { P +n, as a eee i of t sTendants guilty as harged in On recommencation of > + 4 A | J jement is suspended upon | ; No. 83 State vs Andrew Jones John Evans MIN T.TATN No. 73 4 AL LING daha JUL, c + a Plea of mutlés State ER 5 J @ + * vs Be 3 ibered that at this term of R 7 us ‘ 7 os " + + > : ‘<a hy * Bob Benson ou. fF spedeil County beginning November 7th., 1921, of business, this the 8th : i Jury of said Court Caldwell and TA mon +4 OoOrpemean or the wi the Superior failed. Judgment Nisi < es “Wut Messi ee ae aa rand ry, returned into open Court the following bill a. Ln iain follows: ECKIVING Superior Court, Sy ih. INU» ‘ nt tT ~~ OO 4 finding of bill and > un ee eva Term, 1921, ceable Trespass, which 4 v - NE oté ieir o tor for the State 1at Bob Benson 1: ren y of Iredell on the ‘ Re oe : d h day of September, A.D, 192 with force and arms, the county aforesaid, fe usly, wilfully, aforethought, did kill and murder aN : contrary to the form the statute ) RECEIVING, } j aet Aad ( st t) + in such case made and provided, and against the peace LN ¢ LRCENY AN eh his sounsel wt ¢ " iT and Li i a 0 Soutee: MALE finding or ae ia and dignity he state, 4 BULL J» which PLEa LS acceDp ea y é pao eo for the State, STAT Endorsed én the back by the following words and figures, to-wit: No ° 75 ASSAULT WITH DEADLY WEAPON, oh State Lert, . Tt is adjudged and 9 ee Against by %] ee plea off guilty. th y ‘he Court that the defendant be imprisoned in the@atai Bob Benson common jail of Iredell county for a term of NINE MONEE nisi and assigned to work on the public roads of seid coum £ *or said period without felon stripes. INDICTMENT MURDER This Honorable ¢ Panie Court takes ss 1921, at 93:30 o'elock, A.M, iss, a Gov, yPPO8.' ach ath 3 ‘ Tis ae | Beto avs ; : Witnesses, ie Van Benfield Jule Cowan Barter Privette Smith White att Xs ea mater a ee eae No, 33 State vs Ed Shoemaker No, 38 State vs Ed Shoemaker Tuesday, November Sth., 1921, Those marked thus x oe d and sent the Solicitor and sworn and this bill found nt ate e A TRUE C.H. Knox Xamined by Me, and A BILL, Foreman Grand Jury. aud a By order of the Court, the defen adant, Bob “enson, in the custody of M.P, Alex cander the High Sherif of Iredell nb sabic was brought into open Court, The defendant not resented’ by counsel, the Court appointed Messrs, 711, Zeb, V, Turlin igton and Hayden Burke, . to represent him and Llenment, pri isoner, Bot Lorene éxanc jer then he was placed upon eing at the bar Sheriff of The Solicitor, ‘Heyden: Slenent., for .lled upon the Coe eORane and having made knowyr to stend and to him that he the name of Bob Benson, in the’ th@ictment of murder in the first degree, Whereupon lead not guilty and for his trial placed d Country, by the ixty-six ittendance upon November 10th A.D, 1921, devart the Court without rs he trial cr r 75 ot 3 3 +O of the Oo? - ~ + J ct Py by 7 AA tTOTEITtre Bisis UOUI Li's ret urn ed WMA me of murder in the first degree, to to prison to await AP, —— Veit tL Ge + 4+ of the above entitled in which said bill the defendant upon such charge be summoned from the body of the nelled therein, said action, so many of nded that from the body of the county to-be and appear at the cour t house lay of November, 1921 ’ at 10 ° ‘eloc] are necessary or accepted in the process make due return, presence of the defendant and his AN 1921 a TK eg A e 4S Elroy Tae Sa, Court for the biftecnth Judicial District, MANUFACTURING Nol Prog With HAVING LIQUOR FOR PURPOSE Nol Pros With Leave, No. #6 State Vs Ps Bek Morrow Coit Stewart Mitchell > ar bopay: ai fineocéf Lon. Court as to:Deft, continued upon neharvian Pan ) LAVLO!I 2O1 =e this action be 2M EE OE MEN pet pet pe HE emt — enters a plea of recommendation of prayer fo udgment 1s continued upon , aon until November 1923, with leave Solicitor to ¢ause Captae . “issue at any time s defendant, upon it being anita to appear to him the defendant has violated the liguor laws of the tate, and without prejudice to the right of the Court to pronounce judgment upon the defendant at any regular said Court, Defendant required to give bond for his appeerance at the November tern, judgment of the Court, we At ¢ w term of “f in sum Of S200, 19235, to abide the { } ) j 4 ( that ' j | { { a recess until Wednes@ay morning, Nov, This Honora ble Court takes a 9th., 1921, at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, tresiding. | This November 9the,s 1921, { { { 4 i ) Wednesday, November 9th., 1921. Honorable Court convened at UNLAWFULLY RECEIVING Defendant called and instanta Sci Fa 1D mCEIVING NIGMULV Lie called Howard, L,N,Summers, Wilson, H.S,Dingier, L.E.Srvin, J.P.Williams, duly sworn and empannelled ee « wn . 7 a at continued over to Thurs dey recess failed, Judgment Nisi Scl a 1 MW 9:30 o'clock, A,M., wednesday for the dispatch of business. bill Te following jury; HD » W.P.Kilpatrick, AL. odin, E,E,Johnson, C,.B, Hill, T,I,Eidson, after being for thetr verdict, Case morning Nov. 10th, 1921. until Thursday morning, © Thursday, November 10th., 1921. Tis Honorable Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A M November 10th., 1921, for the dispatch of business, NOe 2 State vs Lenzie Allison Agtfred Allison No. 79 State vs M,.H. lsenhour 7, V.Sherrill G;LsSigman No. 26 State vs Gaston Albea No. 80 State vs Haywood Chambers “ale Golden No, 81 State vs Haywood Chambers Fale Golden No. 82 State vs John Holly cre pas pet eae EE PIN NE EE EN TSE TE TING DE MEN PIG MEPS Watall Ghad fA / rm AooaAUL Defendan adjudge Lenzie | e ct d guilty of Simple Assault. It:4s ed by the Court that the deft. 1 69,00 and one-half ~ + py a Oo t a xyic¢c ne Cour t that of °25,00 and r AAaNA' nes aay jury ret or their verdad Manufacturing $4145 Atm ATLL Wild DARNTETCAT . PUNNL- +\ r . ae ~*~ a at . Def endan i ‘olden enters a plea OL oO” Ye en vefendan empannelled NO oe peilng Gu, i their sr dict say tt ‘ find tne defendant guilty 4s charg : Pp as to Fale Golden “wo years and upon payment j action and case No. 81, Bond 550,00 required to appeal xt term of court show tne 4 thet the the common 91 rv MONTHS ne public roads said thot felon strip seer see TT Tot army met OOF } t FULL SN Tit LNLU We WLOCK Tt is therefore ordered by the Court that this case be consolidated with No. 380 for judgment. LARCENY AND RE ie Defendant enters t It is adjudged the Court defendant be jail of Iredell County for & term of EIGHTEEN MONTHS (18) and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period with stripes. per 560 Thursday, November 10th., 1921. 4 + This : 5 : n judged and ordered by the Court that the paremmer th ths, Andrew Jones pay a fine of $40,00 and of the cost and that the defendant John . 713 $10,00 and one-half of the cost. 4 , No. Cae | [, Stet MURDER, Plea not guilty. vs Trial continued over from No Vv 1921. Bob Benson ] ERDICT; Guilty of murder in the Fiz Degree, being ny whereof he stands charged, So Say all the + g py 1, each say for murder in the o PRETEN: =f PrHbELloONOGe A ndant ¢alled and Judgment Nisi Sci Fa 0 ae dl Capias. Rb tT’ Cur ct 2 ATIAR | OR UteUUire Nisi Sel va Ts I pew wt f mrudgement & i ia DAS as ck D ndant ce and feiled ‘ ndant called and failed, Judgment Nist Sei Fa : oe — ia LEQ, et a capias. No Sei Fa to issued if defendant gives é ay thirty days from adjournment of ourt. _vs henry Me Daniels} Fred Shoemaker | lea not guilty. obedience to an order heretofore made in this case, special venire of Sixty-six good and lawful men were surmoned to appear at the Court House, Thurs day Morning, Novenber 10th., 1921, at\@:60 o'clock, A.M, he prisoner being at the bar in the custody of 3 ; 700 SHOW GOOD BEHAVIOR. High Sheriff of Iredell County, whose | Tudement At te to be discharged navment of $100.00 Ve,) Won, Hayden Clement, Solicitor for | sy L. Smith and cost of Sc Pa and other cos mnected therewith asked the prisoner to stand up and warns F - , a "These good men that you shell now hear between the State and you upon your | f, therefore, you will challenge them,- 3 challenge them as they come td book to be sworn, } pefore they are sworn, and yoR | nall be heard,” The following jurors were drawn from | ne reguler jury; I.M,Lipe and I, F, Gouger, and the following were drawn from the special veniremen; sworn at Jan. eee peck Ne RE RO PE A PO SE IS OE OS | : Ts : Fee empanneélled for their verdict: W.E, Stikeleather, L.J.“aynes , i, D.Howard, T.L.Ervin, M.K.Brown, D.P. | Sartin, Robert Cain, T.% Ervin, J,A,Brad ord, and eo tue &,.M.Rankin. state had put on apart of its evidence continued over to Friday morning Nove The prisoner was then remanded to await the orders of the Court. { ' { { 1 { { j { { i { Court takes recess until Fridey morning» This Honorable Court convened 12th., 1921; for Walter Peacock No. 69 State vs Herman Lynch No, 70 State ve Herman Lynch the dispatch of business. pe <I EE et A RS A ren Saturday, November 12th., 1921. at 9:30 o'clock, A.M, Nov, HAVING AN UNLAWFUL AMOUNT OF LIQUOR, Plea not guilty. Jury No, 1 after being sworn and empannelled for their verdict sey they find the Deft, guilty as charged in bill of indictment, It is adjudged and ordered by the Court that the Deft, be confined in | the common j.11 of Iredell County for a term of TWELVE | (12) MONTHS and assigned to work on the public roads’ of said county for said’ period without felon stripes, Defendants plead not guilty. Jury No, 1 after being duly sworn and empennelled for their verdict say they find the defendants and each of them guilty of an AFFRAY, adjudged end ordered by the Court that the Defts, | wey and Grace Gray and each of the them be confined common jail of fredell County for a term of NINE ssigned to work on the public roads of t d without felon stripes. adjudged and ordered by the Court that the Mayola Slosn and Rebecca MeCorkle and each of snfined in the common jail of Iredell County. y (90) DAYS and assigned to work at eged.and infirm, or hired out by the oners, or left in fail as preferred by in . Jitu 4 Uiiie Defendant enters a plea of guilty. It is ordered by the Court that judgment be Sus ment of cost. sudged and ev ad vended upon Continued, WIT iit LINO Continued, HTT AQATITRRTRT TUNTING SQULnnitd Not a true bill. We OVMRDITT OO BND I GL CN 2» a th Defendant eanters a plea of guilty. Consolidated wt No, 70 for judgment, LARGS AND RECEIVING, It ie xesumuas and ordered by the Court +nat oo a be confined in the common jail of Tredell Coun rs term of EIGHT (8) MONTHS, and assigned to wer f public roads of said county for said period wi stripes, | No, 64 | State vs Lewis Moore Tom Hart No. 60 State vs Yavid Honeycutt ve Aull Hemp Respect | No. 35 State vs HgA.Wooten ee et OS ee EE RE penne HEE HEM pet Pk pet Peek eee Oe PE Pet et ot pee ee HE ¢ bane ~ a waturday, November HAVING Poi It is order defendant | of Ired aaatag O55 oF TN to perform T+ vu dot aie ate prayer payment con YEARS, id count , , , A HIad ne become disablea + + . 4 pe ¢ + ws Pas: we Y Did he u at Pyrearrar upon payment f Ian ce’ ne fendant giving amc 7 OOC a ove judgment yer lp WA © Uilt prayer upon payment mndant civing November term, abide the AMHTPACTURING LIQUOR. yiLet BY A r~aAare ana aaiudares yy " ts oraer' C atl Qa : hae » he confined in the common sail of Iredell neeaar Pee 3 bern. of TWELVE (12) MONTHS, and assigned to Work on the nublic roads of said county for said rOLn L ie Puss : period without felon stripes. the Court that the (ANUFACTURING LIQUOR. Ma eve judgment the defendant excepts and appeals ss the aupreme Gout. Notice of appeal given and waived 4 open Court. Appeal bond fixed et $50, Appearance pond fixed at $10,000,00% i i ‘ { { 4 i \ No. 27 State vs Troy Mitchell Saturday, November 12the, 1921, MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, Tt is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of FIFTEEN (15) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period without felon stripes. ANT) TR fan i ik ‘CEIVING ANSPORTING LIQUOR, s ordered and adjudged by the Court that the ve confined in the common jail of Iredell a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned roads of said county for said fr T NACA vw : gy sole y for a a a MANUFACTURING LIQUOK. It is ordered and adjudged by defendant be confined in the Court that the the common jail of Iredell County for a term of SIX (6) MONTHS, and assigned to work on the public roads of said county for said period without felon stripes. WIDOT ATT ARTOAT ANS D TTOTIOR AWFUL QUANII12 OF LIQUOR, August Term, 1921, prayer for judgment to Movember Term, }821. It is therefore adjudged by the Court’ that the da fendant and abitcost. A G, mae defendant failing to pay the fine of 325,00 and one-fifth cost heretofore adjudged, it is therefore, ordered end adjudged by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for a term of THREE (3) MONTHS, and assigned to work on. the public roads of seid county for said period } ripes adjudged by the Court that the ned in the common jail of Iredell (3) MONTHS, and assigned said county for said It is ordered defendant be c County for a term of THREE to work on the public roads of period without felon stripes. FORCHEABLS TRESPASS Deféndant through his counsel waives finding of bill end enters a plea of guilty of Forceable Trespell sa 4s ordered arid adjudged by the Court that judgment suspended upon payment of cost, Forfeiture neretolo : made is striken out. , MANUFACTURING LIQUOR, Nol Pros With Leave as to Troy Mitchell. heretofore made striken out, Capias 4s to Forfeiture Renegars — SCI FA DOCKET, No. 1 State vs Grover L. Smith No. 2 State vs Joe Eecles No. 3 State ° No, 4 State vs State vs Bob Benson North Carolina, | Iredell County. | Re. To State { vs Bob Benson {| opinion The undersigned attorneys and are Counsel for Bob Benson ( that they have carefully examined the case of applicable thereto, and they that the prisoner fact, and pray the Court ere Saturday, November 12th., 1921. ROD any rr \ Tart Atrr wi PIV t \VIOR, ‘ to be discharged on payment of #100, and cost of Sci Fa and other cost connected therewith and executing a $200, bond for his appearance »+ + Tt wm On . 4 aa at ON e rerm Fie ind Snow £00 behavior. ‘> rp + 4 Judgment Absolute m weTrTmnyry + Wood as ' mar + Ay : + 6 ent Absolute ward noe nat £ paying co SU Ol pe digéharged on defendant Sei Fa and s aninas GW LaAo @ verdict of the jury ‘udement is 2 n Court and through ‘ne Solicitor and his rgide the vardict and i and to be assigned, he defendant. } lefendant to days . pve cB6unter case file exceptions. Upon certificdteof Defendan A } 4+ ar saaner it is ordered that deie! iant befallowea ‘ Supreme Pauperis. upreme Court superior Courts, November Term, 192 TIFICATE 0} COUNSE! nereby certify that they were term of the Court for MURDER said Benson and the law have and here certify that they are of the has a good and meritorious defense in law and nt the appeal in this case to Supreme Courte ther o% Lay; tried at this JI,H. Burke Zeo, Ve Turlington L.C, Caldwell No, 795 Worth Carolina, tredell County. 4 state of NORTH Benson being duly sworn says; that he is wholly unable to give the cost on appeal to the Sunreme Court and is advised by co oO 0 + ct a I @ by Syorn and subse this November 1 TW Sharvn Ue ew tte pe r ~ VED. Chev s Arm HOY rorma PuUye ,enson be Bob Benson, you have been indicted, tried and convicted by a jury country v prescribes that the punishment for your crime is death. of said County and by ™ custody of sal that on said a | o'clock dn the | of execution i im delivered to Saturday, November 12th., 1921. \ In the Superior Court, November Term, 1921. AE onable cause for the appeal prayed and that the applicatio a he respectfully prays that the Court make an order in forma pauperis. Bob Benson rived, 2th., 1921. plication it is ordered that Bob appeal to the Supreme Court in P. A. McElroy Juage rresi ding e In the Superior Court, November Term, 1921. of murder in the first degree of one J, Robert Dishmeane ‘ourt. therefore, is that you be remended to VOUL Uy u t0 remain until the adjournment of Anarntray thea County, there you be conveyed by the High sneriff State of North Carolin Penitentiary 5 4s further ordered end adjudged that you remain in the . - ~ 5 d warden until Friday, the 27th day of January» 1922, and ay, between the hours of ten o'clock in the forenoon and thr afternoon, that you be taken by the said warden to the Pe n the said Penitentiary. And it is adjudged that the said “arden then and there caus? a current of ele on your soul, ctricity of sufficient intensity and voltage to cause de pass in and through your body until you are dead; and may God have mer PLA. McElroy 1, Judge Presiding él November Term, 1921, To THE SUPERIOR COUR Judge P.A.McElroy, Judge Presiding. We the grand jurors for the November Term,of Iredell Superior Court. 1921, be leave to submit the following report: We have passed upon all us by the Solicitor and made return of the same to the Court, We visited the jail by committee and found nine white prisoners, a all males; ten colored prisoners, nine males and one female. We find the condition, the steam pipe in jail be repaired, also a sprey be placed instead of the spigot in room. We visited the cahin gang end find twenvy four prisoners; fifteen white and nine colored. The prisoners questioned say that they uv are well cared for ana the fare is satisfactory. # y thing is in good pendttion, We think that a large supplied, also mattresses for prisoners. We visited the County white males eventeen white + colored females. Two of these tvo are epileptics. The buildings and grounds are in good shape, and th fields are in good tate of cultivation. | have three hundred bushels of wheat, six or seven hundred bushels four or five hundfed pushels of corn; four hundred cans of fruit nd some dried fruit. We questioned the inmates as to their fare end atr and they sey that they are well fed with good and who lesope food treated by the keeper. A committee of our pody stigated the several offices of the Court house and find the records properly kept as best they could. judge, We recommend that. the no 7 nait also the offices are in good condition. floor in the vault in the Register of Deed's office be repaired, © Respectfully submitted, + <~ C,H. Knox Foreman This November llth., 1921. This Honorable Court takes a recess until Monday November 1921, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M. . Monday, Nowember 14th., 1921, North Carolina, |} Terhh 1921, Tredell County. | Second week, vo @ Honorable Court convened at 10:00 o'clock, A.M, Monday for the dispatch of business, His Honor, Judge hiaxandan ~ @ tL OMALILUGL ’ Sheriff of Iredell County, the following good ana this term of Court, to-wit: J.M, Cartwright, B.P,Restler, JeE,Bryant, A.M. Turner, C.A, Freeze, A.J,Crater, R 1 oT Rte ON — ~ rT i aa hi @ teed awrUily ‘ 7 TOO y the ise VAVIS, ZOO, Dotson, 700d LY +5, H+ 2 a 2 ates une account of sickness A,d,Crater, Geo.\/, Dotson, itinued, Qn Continued, No. 27 Se ee <a Pitt-Barniun Wa Mc ee : Continued j famniann Veli. MOM? 450nN No, 34 W.T. webster, et V S eae Continued, J.5.Setzer No. 40 C.B.Stewart, Admr, vs Continued ithller-Menufacturing Co, : Wa, 41 Normandie Co, Vs Neal-Plott Gorcery Co, Continued °-* D,Hartness, J,T,Nesbit, C,li,Steele, - liondarr No m1 “ nN ” aonday, November 14th., 1921 Second week, . No, 47 J.H.Critz, Admr, VS Esther Horn Critz, No. 49 Carolina Motor Co, Vs N.V.Jong rors ; nT bo de sbit 9D8 EE EE ON et wet pee rm, : tTlannhnak This Honorab A.M, November LOG ss + OAL by the Court that M,. Sho, s island Insurancé Co,., > be allowed to make gehen e11~ Rutgers Inc, Co., and each of these Union Insurance Co, No. 1 y y H.W.Seott, Trustee of Frick Co.[ The following jurors after being duly vs’ { sworn and empannelled for their verdict sey +} a : . 4 L.W. Powell, 2.W.Powell, and { say they answer the issues as recorded H.L.Norman } onother page of the minutes ; jurors, i J.F.“aymer, K.M.Hobbs, C,M,Shook, J.E, r Bryant, Gy Ay Freeze * As is Goodin, M. Les Davis J.P, Walters, R.G,Johnston, G.R,Walker, J.T. Nesbit, and T,I,Nixon, This Honorable Court takes a recess until Wednesday morning at 9330 o'clodk, A.M. November 16th., 1921, November 16th., 1921, Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M, November Stevenson Ju No, 2 art ing sworn and empannelled ‘or their 31 ay they anstier bhésissues nson 3 recorde: mn another page of thésmthntes, Continued, es ‘ a. er Pele + ent I Vv Ns) na*h er LO TASI in charge UPt v L Motion overruled. excepts. iM for new trial for he record committed Wy. to be as ned, Motion overruléd. excepts to th i\dement and appeals preme Court, Notice of appeal nage + i that’ a c RIAA By consent agrece oe oe pet HS ME IE RE HE EY RE pT HO OE pee appeal and the State 60 days » in which to’ make and serve counter except thereto. ‘ : appearing to the Court that the defen in case is unable to employ cousel and that he is charged with murder, 4 capitan . offense, it is ordered by the Court that lee Caldwell, d.H,Burke and Zeb, V. Turlington yy) ah Y) for and represent him in said action, It il further ordered by the Court that the coun Iredell pay to said attorneys the sum of for their services, Pe eT Ee RE EE HEE EE yndant have 60 days in which to make ang and they are hereby appointed counsel to Sapper) November Term, 1921, No. 62 North Carolina, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. Iredell County. NOVEMBER TERM 1921, Dave Stevenson vs Mary Stevenson. J lst. Were the plaintiff and d ari as alleged in the com- plaint? Answer. Yes. ®nd. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of N. C.° for five years immediately previous to the comsencement of this action? Answer. Yes. ard, Have the plaintiff and defendant been separate and apart for than five years Answer. Yes. In the Superior Court. November “erm 192). Us a: cause coming on to be hea hi ora of court before his . es . Pr ania 1 xe See Se : Honor Hon. P. A. McMipoy, judge presiding, anc 4 jury ond it being hearc, } ° 4 s an r ha 1 and a ~ > and the following issues having been submitted to the jury and answered. aw 7 ee i tad as allecet 4 | mp lant? Were the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the complanht Answer, Yes. co : ea Aen he Ste Nort £ Has the plaintiff been @ resident of the State of North C .rolina ‘ re aa es $o ¢ ? Ans fomfive years imnediately prior to the comsencement of this ac ? Ans. : : ,. aa 2 ) arn 14 a anars + a avnart, for more Have the plaintiff ana defgndant lived separate and a] " ¥ . . v m es act 8 res than five years nrior to the commencement of HL action, Answer, es. ordered adjudged and decreed Yoy “the court that the Yo Wherefore it is bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the defendant Mary “tevenson | and the Plaintiff Dave Stevenson be and they are hereby dissolved, and the said said Dave Stevenson is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the Mary Stevenson. It is further ordered by the court tha y the clerk of this court. t the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed b Lroy. Judge Presiding. aN ~ November Term, 1921, 134 Noe er. North Carolina, Tredell County. Bertie crawford In Superior Court, November Term 1921. cause coming on to be heard before Judge P. A. McElroy and a jury j 4 and being heard and the issues being answered in favor of the plaintiff as follows: therefore ordered vetween Carolina, redell County. the plaintiff plaint? Ans. tes. iL 1 end. Has the plaintiff be for five years prior to the A AnS . Yes. Srd. Did the defendant sep and apart from her for five Ans. Yes. as alleged in the a resident of the the institution of thi 4 the bonds of matrimony here- and defendant be and th same are taxed by the Clerk » In Superior Court. November Term 1921. ry as alleged in the come en a residen State of North Carolina instituLbion of this suit? erate himself from his wife and live separate years as alleged in the complaint? QO LABIOIBOLGIOGAIEBS QG00520B08GBB30080038 November Term, No. 70 North Carolina, Iredell County. Annie Shoemaker, vs ft Grady Shoemaker. ist. Were the complaint? Answer Yes. 2nd. olina for fi Ans. 3rd. for five yes North Carolina, Tredell County. Shoemaker follows: viz: ist. the complaint? Answer Yes. ond. Has the nleintif? i Carolina for five years next preceeains 3rd. Have the plaintif! » ae? five years as alleged in the complaint! It is therefore conside mondy now existing between the pla hereby dissolved and the plaintiff is said defendant. It is action. intiff and defendant be and they are mrantec an avsolute divorce from my ordered that the plaintiff pay costes of this 1921. In the Superior Court. November Term, 1921. ed as alleged in North Car- ction? f Superior Court. n 1921 va) fie . - te © > North heen a res: ent ol a ee ; NOP UI . . ‘ the com rencement of action? er and defendant lived separate and for Ali A -~“ . ‘ Answer t@S8. red and adjudged that the wunds of matri~ | November Term, 1921, November Term, 1921, | : s the plaintiff b 1 es | Ha Pp een a resident of the State of North Carolina for five No. l. ears next prior to tl 4 hic j North Carolina, In the Superior Court. | y 1e beginning of this action? Answer, Yes, Iredell County. Hovember Term, 1921. — " * ‘ Wherefore it is ordered adjudged and decreed by the court that the ponds of matrimony heretofore existing betwe laintif Ter H. ¥. Scott, Trustee : : g betwen the plaintiff Lester Alex and r, nd the defendant Mary Alexe nder he na they are heret r Cc ue a i16xan es a sn are iereby disso ved of he yd ck ompany v ’ yY J 1 ISSUES. and the said Lester Alexander is granted an absolute divorce from the anid vs Emma Alexander. ee ee ee eee L.W. Powell, et al It is further ordered by the Court that the plaintiff pay the cost of this action to be taxed by the cler’ of th’'s court. ! ist. Did the defendant, J. W. Powell, endorse the notes sued on in P. A. Mcllroy this action? Judge Presiding. i Answer. eS. ond. Did the defendant, H. L. Norman, endorse the notes sued on ne QQ i this action? AnSe Noe ; No. 83 Are the defendants, or either of them, indebted to the plaintiff, and) Bertha Clark, ) if so which ones, and in what anount? ) | vs ) L851 ES. , a ~ Answer. L. “ie Powell Note 16/6/29 575200 | ) Clayton Cyark ) Int. 2/4/5 80.50 First, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry 45 Alleged in the meer oes Br? ae { - - ad Total 9655.50 | complaint? J. We Powell Pay 18/11/1 150.00 | A ; Vea a a Answer. Yes. Bal total 5505.50 P . Second Has the plaintiff been 4 resident of ve State of North | scond. Has the plai tH. S/6/16.. cc aoe dks ae Carolina more than two years prior to the institution of this suit! w a | Total $597.75 Answer. Yes. 21/11/16 a , aia 1/ / Third Did the defenda: t+ com adultry as lleged in the comp aint? @QQUGCUERU@EIBEAB.L GOA @IVOo QUOEREIOOCGOGBIE 13S. TOS Tn the Superior Court. wT North Carolina, No. 78 . Navember Term 1921 Trede1l1 County. Navenbet THM SMEs North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Bertha Clark, Irede C : t Term 1921 ai 11 County November ° eS \ JUDGMENT. Lester Ajexander ) | ) Clayton Clark ) vs ) JUDGMENT. Emma Alexander. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the court before | ( a e a) ] eing heard and t ay nearing that the a eee ing on to be heard at this term of court before his Judge P. A. McE roy and & jury and being ppe | n e ry having answere rr ry fol ows? ‘irst Did the plaintifs and lefen- i Hono ’ o As McEyroy and a jury and th ju ~ { da the issues ied jury answered the issues as lows Fi ’ | d in the complaint? Ans. ‘es. | mitted to them as follows: ae | dant intermarry as allege 6 att adont of the State of North Gar- fy Was the plaintiff and defendant married as alleged in the comple | Second. Has the plaintiff been a res oe % re om ; | ican eae thks two years prior to the anetituition of this suit? Ans.*ess F Ss ? es. ; | ay F dultry as alleged in the complaint? Have the plaintiff and defendant lived separate and apart 70% | Third. Did the defendant commit adultry j : than five years prior to the com encement o f this action. Answer. Yes. 4 Answer, Yes, November Term, 1921 November Term, 1921, It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the bonds of matrimony Y heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same arc hereby dissolved and that the cost be taxed by the clerk against No. 9 the plaintiff. | North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, P . A, M cE roy 5 | * } } i ed Judge Presiding. Iredell County. | November Term, 1921. G,M,.Simpson (digs YI Y PP AGEARAALRO = DARAAA GQQVOUBERO GIB BQIGRIBe VS C o > Pe pe A ri Q4 - Fred H, Conger | No. 82 7” 2 fary Bailev | a ‘ . . > 5 4 e . * ‘ ment et } (1) What payments di@ctne defendant meke on the notes suea on ana the ) a VS wp) Ue ) ) Gate on which payments, if any, were mak Fred Baile? i eg al ; a aac Fred Bailey re ANSWER: Paid %480,00 with three mules the last of Judne or \ ! j 7 j ‘firs July 913 Also the Beck note °159,00 including interest First. Did plaintiff anc defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? | first of July, 1913. Also the Beck n L59. neluding ’ Ye paid No, 30th., 1915. aA swe re L Cf e } $ S N | (2) What amount, 3 rth i 2 e t entitled to Second. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of Nort! Carolina | wnat amount, i+ ’ i i i i hi i 2 er on his counter-claim ¢ for two years prior to the institution of this suit? recover on his co C | ANSWER: ONE HUNDRED ($100.00 ) Dollars without interest, Answ I's Yes. £ shout June 17th., 1913 or July 8th., 1916 Third. D the defernda t commit adultry 4s alleged in the complaint? about June 17th., 1 ; Us» . : | Answer Yes. NOs 30 a 2 3 — + Za »,rpeaca +1}, } + Art J. Elan, et al { Con: LAE + Vv ~* ‘ eed Dy tLne par and | vs “ | ordered by the..court that this.case be sé6t: 1S, Dexter, et al |} for the first éase for trial on the first day 7.5. Dexter No 82 \ of Givi e JUL tb, art le Wwe 4 “@ y Narth Caro lina, In the Syperior Court. No, 22 cicada gen ienncsciniecal + r | iVe x Niacin natin a aArnraoa?s AA tn6 par and Tredel Caunt November Term 1921 4.G.S war { ont wed, t, " Tredell ounty. ov o Be ' — art x jena Wi e Court t * this ease be set : : ‘i cnn : $ +) re Bai W, Spring i for the @hdst case for trial on’ the first ee eee Thos. W, Springs se of Civil Court at nex t terme | vs ) JUDGMENT. 7 le or ss sre toe be C { , It is agreed by the bar and before Hormandie ae | ner the Court that this case be set This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court be ' vs sie a, forttrial on the first | : d Neal-Plott Grocery Co. { third ese eg s e r lal aving § : Gav of civil court &U NOAL Lume Judge P. A. McElroy and a jury and being heard and the jury having answere { dsj the issues as. follows: oe oe { Conti ued 1 D3 ‘ ‘ am | 7 Adm ontinue 5 First. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as allegec in the | AQT,Rinehardt, oS - it is actbed by the bar and ordered by the : | J.P,Rinenardt, dec ad ;: oe that euae wade De B6t for the Foust ' VW UO lw 1aAv UliLw " aad aa! — “a r i complaint? Ans. Yes ve ‘ for trial on the first day of eivil | Mooresville Cotton Mills { case for ial s North Care ; Cc { court at next term, Second, Has the plaintiff been a resident of +he State of No Oo lina for two years prior to the institution of this suit? Ans. Yess | i Third. Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? | ‘is meameeiies ee cakka Pehaay nemning at | | : | | ay we | 9:30 o'elock, AsMs, November 16th., 19°, | | It is therefore ordered and adju ged that the bonds of matrimony | - | | between the plaint4ff and defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved a : and that the cost be taxed by the Clerk against the plaintiff. : a ; is : ‘ if P. A. MOELroy — , a nd Judge Presiding-. | 2003000082900U3 @ _GaCO.0B 0G2OGQAGIE November Term, 1921. Mis Honorable Court convened at 9:50 o'clock, A.M, November 18th., 1921, for the dispatch of business, } Continued, { OOO L@dGIICGIBBVL 2 QQGRAG00I030 100 G0 No. 6 North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Tredell County. November Term, 1921, CHANTS & FARMERS BANK OF MOORESVILLE, N. C. vs D. A. Beam and wife L. A. Beam. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before his Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding, and after the reading of the pleadings, the Court being of the opinion that the cause ought to be re=- ferred, now. Therefore, by consent of the parties to this action it is consider- ed, ordered and adjudged tyat Dorman Thompson and D. L. Raymer be and they are hereby appointed Referees to take and state an account of all matters of differences arising upon the pleadings in said cause, who are d&rected to male their findings of facts and conclusions of law andreport to the next term of this court. Pp. A, McElroy Judge Presiding. BIACOIOGIIISAAISGSD No. 23 North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court. Iredell County. ) November Term, 1921. Joseph Hamoy et al ) . ) vs ORDER MAKING ADDITIONAL PARTY. ) Rhode Island Insurance Co. This cause coming on for trial at this term of the Superior Ce and the pleadings being read and His Honor, P. A. McElroy, judge pre being of the opinion that the County Board of Education of Iredell ¢ North Carolina, is a necessary party plaintiff to this action: | November Term Superior Court. 579 Education of Iredell County, North Carolina, a body corporate composed of F. B. Gaither, 4%. ©. Wooten and D. W. Lowrance, be and it is hereby made 4 i party plaintiff to this action. It is further ordered and adjudged that S. J. Holland, administrator of C. S. Holland deceased, be ard he is hereby made a party plaintiff to this action. It is furthere ordered and adjudged that the County Board of Educa- tion of Iredell County, and S. J. Holland, administrator of C. 5. Holland or any of them shall have twenty days from the adjournment of this court to come into court and file their complaint or adopt the complaint of the plaintiff in this action, and that the defendant shall have twenty days thereafter to file its answer. / Di i OG ini cascnsnlnannmcannlannceinll ee a meee Judge Presiding. BOO GBA VQVOVI..A3-: No. 24. North Carolina, In the Supérior Court. Iredell County. ) November Term, 1921. Joseph Hamoy et al MAING ADDITIONAL PARTY. This cause coming on to be heard at the November Term, of the Sup - crior Court before His Honor, Pp, A. MeBlroy, judge presiding and a jury and His Honor being of the opinion that the County Board of Education of Iredell County, Nort! Carolina, is a neces°ary party plaintiff to th’s action: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the County Board of nT arr ‘ E rave Fompose Education of Iredell County, North Carolina, a body corporate compo ed of . ‘ . ’ } > , : : 5 } > ) x r , ‘ . B. Gaither, ¥- C. Wooten and D- *- Lowrance, be and it 15 hereby made a party plaintiff to this action. It is further ordered and adjudged that S. J. Holland, administrator of C. S. Holland deceased, be and he is hereby made a party plaintiff to e We , gaviniae this action. tt is further ordered and adjudged tht the County Board of Educa~ tion of Iredell County, ana S. J. Holland, administrator of Gy % Helland or any of them shall have twenty days from the adjournment of this court 41e their complaint 0 t the defendant shall have twenty days i ente court ana f r adopt the complaint of the ome in plaintiff in this action, and tha thereafter to file its answere No. 25 North Carolina, ee Tredell County. Joseph Hamoy et al vs ) ) ) Union Insurance Co. This cause coming on to be heard at the November Term of the Superior Court before His Honor, P Honor being of the opinion that the County Board of “@ducation of TIiedell County, Nerth Carolina, is a necessery party plaintiff to this action. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the County Béard of Fducation of Iredell County, North Carolina, a body corporate composed | of F. Be Gaither, #. C. Wooten and D. W. Lowrance, be and it is hereby party plaintiff to is further ordered ©, Holland deceased this actione Tt is further ordered c of Iredell County, and ». 1 shall have twenty days from the adjournment of this Court to ‘nto court and fle their complaint or adopt the complaint of the plaii in this action, and o file its answer. No. 3 North Carolina, Iredell County. Jessie B- Van Camp, et al P. B. Kennedy, et al (1) Are the plaintiff in the complaint? Answer: Yes. remove timber? Answer: Yes, November Term 1921. In the Superior Court,’ November! Tevingr1921, ORDER MAKING ADDITIONAL PARTY. A. McElroy, judge presiding and a jury, and His + this action. and adjudged that 5. J. Holland, administrator , be and he is hereby made a party plaintiff to | and adjudged that the County Board of Education | j + J. Holland, administrator of C- ©. Holland, or that the defendant shall have twenty days there- P. A, McElroy Judge Presiding. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. NOVEMBER TERM, 1921. s the owners in fee simple of the land described * (2) Daa the defendants unlawfully enter upon said land and cut and, November Term 1921. (2) What damages, if any, have plaintiffs sustained? Answer: $169.00 No. 135 Henkel & Barber VS Southern Raliway Co. Defendant renews motion of non suit. Motion sustained and plaintiff excepts and appeals to the Supreme Court. Notice of appeal given and waived in open court and ap eal nd fixed at 50. Tt rreed tie t the plaintiffs shall have 60 days from the adjournment of this c¢ urt to serve his case on appeal and defendant to e 60 days thereafter to serve counter case and file exceptions. N66. io North Carolina, Tredell County. Henklie & Barber, o Southern Railway 3 de- Judge . non si 4 t, conc lusi< ion l 3 and said motion being Tt is therefore conside tiff be and they are hereby nonsuited, write and that defendant cost to betaxe ee Judge Presiding. Noe 9 In the Superior Court. North Carolina, November Termy 1921. Iredell County. G. M. Simpson JUDGMEN vs Fred H. Congers This cause coming on to be heard, and ‘being heard before His Honor $ Ss P. a wetteadey budge Prodi dingy MOR, Oe and the jufy having anewere’ ° ° 4 , the issues submitted by the court, 45 set out in the record: tt is ordered and adjudged by the court tht the ae allah of the defendant the | | ie further adjudged by the 7th day of November, 1921, unt sum of 450.30, with interest on said amount from the; 581 November Term 1921. court that the defendant pay the costs of this action. __ Pp. A. McElroy Judge Presiding. @l02EGBOBE GIS North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. Rovember Term 1921. ORDER FOR SALE OF AUTOMOBILE SEIZED IN THIS CASE. ise coming on to be heard and it appearing that W. ¥. Rankin | ‘attel mort@age bearing date of Dec. 1920, and duly reord gister of Deeds, jce in Iredell County and that the said the purpose for which D. W. Benfield was putting lis Case. ordered that the said automobile be sold by the of sale in said mortgage and that any surplus 4 ifter payin ff the note served by the said Chattel, mortgagee, be paid rior Court as a forfeiture. P, A. MeBlroy Judge Presiding. QDAABRD BS Drs As Doh Be ARAAAG AAAS No. 43 North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Tredell County. November Term 1921. JUDGMENT. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before 4 ws . ‘ ‘ jac Judge P. A. McElroy and being heard and it appearing that the parties to ; : o that he this suit have settlod their differences by the defendant admitting that h the plaintiff the sum of $35.00 on the notes and accounts suéd on and by the defendant agreeing to pay the cost in the Superior Court. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of ° 8 the defendant the sum of $35.00 with interest at six per cent and the coat) increased in the Superior Court to be taxed against the defendant by the Clerk of the Superior Court. Plaintiff to pay costs in J. P- Court. Pp, A. MeElroy Consented to be Judge Presiding. Z. V. “urlington,Atty. for Plaintiff A. L. Starr, & H. P. Grier Atty. for defendants. @ILqnCWeIITEWe 0Q0003..33000908 | | Noe 1. North Carolina, Tredell County. H. W. Scott, Trustee for the Frick Company. TL. We Powell, H. L. Norman and J. We Powel ) ) ) vs ) JUD ) ) ) Thi ° ii Court before the jury having answered the issues sibmi Answer. pnd. action? Answer. L. November 11, 19%1. Tt is therefor of the gefendants, L. interest thereon from is further orderea the defendants, L-W.. Powell and It is further ordered and nothing against the defendant November Term 1921 r Wi In the Sunerior Court. Nover ber Term, 1921 é ae the Sunerior and a jury, and PolIlOWwS tmwit? liows, to-wit note sued on in ecover with sliaintiff recover rig action. plaintiff eecover 2 @QOGE OUGIQICDI QdOVe8 North Carolina, Iredell County. The Board of Missions of Freedman of Presbyterian Church, United States of America, QO. J. Allen. 4 sl This cause coming on for heari Judge Presiding, and 1t appearing to the between the parties hereto is the locati two parties; and it further ferences and a judgment may be entered & mise: KAA appearing that they have compromised their dif- i J In the Superior Court. November Term, 31921. JUDGMENT. ng before His Honor, P. A. McElroy court that the disput arising on of the division lines petween ccording to the terms of the compro November Term 1921. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the foldowing Rid. Meme 1008 noundaries shall be the line between the parties: No. 7 Beginning at @easar Allison's corner on Green Street in the city of North Carolina, ‘ici bu Statesville, running South 87 East 34 poles to an iron stake; North 20 West | Iredell County. ec was ee 15 feet to a stake; North 87 West 24 feet to a stake on Green Street; South! Pp. B. Kennedy 20 Feet to the peginning. | | = \ ) ) For which lot of land the defendant agrees to pay the plaintiff the H. C. Hunter taxed against plaintiff. | A | sum of 3125 00 and costs | | T thi a ie haces 3 ‘ = ' | | In this case the plaintiff takes a non suit, Let costs be | | Wherefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that 0. J. Allen owner entitled to the possession of the aforesaid tract of land. P. A. MeEl e Se MOELLFOV Judgre Presiding. further ad judged that the plaintiff recover bf the defendant, 0. J. sum of $125.00 and costs of ction to be taxed by the Clerk of Pp. A. McElroy Judge Presiding. xT North Carolina, In the Superior Court. for defendant. e11 County. November Term, 1921. " " . anc VS DT TtIror RECEIVER. ™ rt Tredell Farmers’ Union Warehouse Company. No. 5 coming on to be hearg ®t November Term, 1921 N h C j I he Superior Court North Carolina, ee a eaters ita 2 ee of the Superior Col of Iredell County, before His onor, Pp. A. McElroy Tredell County. November Ter judge presiding, and it appearing to the Court that on the 17th day of , Grace Blackwelder on, heirs at law of October, 1921, that D. L. Raymer and P Dulin were ) uT nr » van Ualhp a sabel I’cPhers 2 | } | by order of His Honor Byackburn : lredell Farmers’ Union ~ P., A. McElroy, appointed temporary recei JUDGMENT. Warehouse Company, Anc it further appee the petition for the Kennedy and H. C. Hunter appointment of a nermanent receiver for said corporation was continued: until + 1Q0° wher 9 3 1e r Ss I y This cause coming on to De heard before His Honor, Judge Monday, the 7th day of November, L921, when ana where the said motion was to be heard by the undersigned at Statesville, and the hearing of said Presiding, and a jury , at the “anuray Term 1921, of the Superior Court of the Suverior Court of Irede Cal vy. anc sno heard and the jury havin motion having been continued from said day until the 19th day of November, I spurt of Iredell County, and being heard J & been heard and it appearing to the court that A answered the issues as set out in the record: 1921, and said motion having It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court the said corporation, if not insolvent is in eminent danger of becoming } } nN f f a n j j f t 1er t } C ur i a a a io fo i that the i lai nti Pk recover of the def endants the sum of one hun ired a d nsolvent. Ane i % appear ni ur he Oo the ourt th y ti e pplic t n . j in } ] r j n h £ e ve of sai a corp rati on is not resisted sixty nine do 1! a Sy and th ut the aef er dants pa; the cos Ls of th 5 actio t e appoi ntr ient of a ye rmanent rec 94 ? - O ? to be taxed by the Cyerk of this Court. by the defendant’ P. A. MeBlroy It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court | oi iCss Judge Presiding. that said corporation be and the same is hereby dissolved, and that D. L. Raymer and P. P. Dulin pe and they are hereby appointed permanent receivers BLBGLOOUKIIOIO. IU . vy. and as such permanent QD SOOT KXGOOOGI of the Iredell Farmers’ Union Warehouse Company, Pp receivers are hereby authorized and empowered tO take in charge all of the property, both real and personal, pelonging to said corporation and y into cash by ei Said sale to be made upon such terms and to reduce said propert ther public or private sale as may to said receivers seem peste November Term 1921. conditions 4s to said receivers may seem just and proper. ers are further authorized and empowered to collect in all sums owing and due the said corporation, bringing such suits and actions as may be nec- essary therefor, and to do all things needed and necessary:to reduce the property and assets of said corporation into cashe The saidreceivers are are authorized and directed to give notice; by publication inthe Statesviil Daily once a week for four weeks, 4 notice to all creditors of said cor- ion to said receivers on oP before the 15th day of January, 1922, or said creditors will be barred from any participation in the’ distribu- 1e said receivers are further my ry Lion of the assets of said corporation. ordered to pass upon all claims of creditors against said corporation pre- within said date and make report thereof to this Court. before entering upon their duties, shall make and sufficient security in the sum of Ten he faithful performance by them as said permanent receivers are further authorized anddirected to give notice | summons in tl ion, notifying all creditors and to come in and make theme elves parties | further orders. e ¢he Judge Presiding over the Novembe Term of the Superior Court of +redell County for 1921. KOGDICARA AS pO Tve ad KAVBARAAS AAAS In the Superior Court. November Term 1921. U. S. Greer This cause coming on to be heard at the November term of Iredel Superior Court, before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge eniaings and being heard, upon motion of the plaintiff, Etta Greer, through her counsel thal she be allowed to take a voluntary non-suit: It is ordered adjudge and deéreed th t the plaintiff be allowed to take a judgment of non-suit. It is further ordered by the Court that + And said receive| plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. P, A. M Judge Presiding. Ga 4 BA DO AKL QC KBOVBOE November Term 1921. No. 42 North Carolina, $ Superior Court. Tredell County. November Term, 1921. Ezekiel McDaniels ) ) VS ) ) ) Bernice McDaniels Ist: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Car- i ( “e than two . << wile 7 ‘ ; : olina for more than two years prior to the starting of this action? Ans. Yes. ond D3 h : 2 eo ONG « Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry 2s allerec in the complaint? Answer: defendant continuously lived separate and apart from each other for more than five years prior to the starting of this action? Answer? Ezekiel McDaniels Vs Bernice Mc} cause coming 0o! be i at is, the November term of Iredell Superior Court, and being heard before His Honor, P- A. McElroy Judge Presiding, nd ¢ , and the following issues having been submitted: of the State of North Carolina “rT u Has the plaintif? been a resident for more than five years nrior to the starting of this action? Did the f nore LV y I 3 $ “ene pe, BtLeced: at ne nnlaint? Have plaintiff ind defendant intermarry ©» Alleged in the comp int aed the plaintiff and defendant continuously lived separate and apart from each : Pe ‘ " other for more than five years prior tothe starting of this action? " " ‘ lh ‘ Ana each issue answered "yes by the jury: we It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved and that a divorce absolute be granted to the plaintiff and the same is here~ by ordered It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. __ Ps Aa MeBL roy Judge Presiding. JOB WOOO GBOOB) JES DIDOGOBIGIE. 22 yd) R. W. Scott, Trustee ; The Frick Co., L. W. Powell, H- eos ‘ ie fendant , a new trial . in ens of s of anpnearl given endant allowed November Term 1921. L. Norman, J.W. Powell. J.W. Powell, moved to set aside the verdict and for a Motion overruled and defendant excepts the judgn p judgment. Defendant J.W- Powell acce ts and appeals to the Supreme Court Noti Defendaan p ii i ’ tice in open court and waived and appeal bond fixed at $100. 60 days to serve case on appeal, and plaintiff allowed 60 days thereafter to serve exceptions or counter case. North Carolina, Tredell County. State ) ) 7 ) / Bob 3ensi le ) The Prisone Court an aving nd Court 7900 ) ritor Cc rt thet the R yrdered that the scord in said cause is necessxry for his appeal, QUP @QLOOCEOC QOEGDGEGBDSBVE Superior Court. Nov. Term 1921. r, Pob “enson having prayed an appeal to the Supreme filed his affidavit of his inability to give an appeal having certified that in their opinion the prisoner has rious reasons for the appeal, and it appearing to the Lt is cost to Mrs. Crews, Stenographer be paid by the Commis- sioners of the County out of the general funds. KurknxKanakingy Xrenetxrx aunty, | 5 A MecBl OF: Judge Presiding. ‘ KA an uA ALM / - - Bide XY Ad pI AIA AS EnxkhextuneKriaexkKaurksZx Kaxxt oe rege er AOS ee nm ma ipmveenenneeaananssreese ss Saturday, November 19th., 1921, Te following jurors after being duly sworn and empannélled for their verdici, jurors: G.R,. Walker, J,1.Tnomas, J,M,Taylor, C.M. Steele J.A. Yay, N.G.Holmes, J,.F.Walters, B,P,Kestler,' c,M.Shook, J.E.Bryant, T.2.Nixon and C. A. Preez say they cannot agree, jury stand 7 to 5 in favor to Deft. Jury withdrawn by the Court and mistrial had, red by the Court that all civil cases not disposed of are continued. If is further ordered by the Court that in all civil actions the plaintiffs shall have 30 days in which to file pleadings and that the defendants shall have 30 days thereafter to file answers. The following jurors efter being duly Sworn 4 it © end empannelled for thetr verdict, jurors | ?.1,Nixon, ",G Holmes, J.F.Walters, C.M, Shook, R,G,Johnston, J.T. Tesbit, M.L.~avis, A.Re Goodin, G.R,Walker, C,A. Freeze, KM, Hobbs, and J,A, Day, hey énsver>the issues 68 recorded on p 580 of the minutes. North Carolina, deli C 1 redell. County. 3rawl ey and P. P. vs and M. A. Cavin the Superior Court of Iredell] Jonn A. & lands describec in sursuant to the said lands sale a ublie a 10 f 22 4 ion <¢ t yu i ;@ doo f Irdédel} County, When i a aer for » County on the Qnd day hall report of November, vithin 10 U his proceeding hereunder into of said sale. days after the date This cause is retained for further orders. J. \. Hartness Clerk Superior Court. gra day of October, 1921. In the Superior Court, ; , North Carolina, Refore the Cie rk, BS E -Trecell County. ) R,V. Drawley and P. P, Dulin vs G. and M. A» Gavin report of the® gon sioner and ri ‘ Cour ' <nosed an land to ranale a nmty on the @nd of November 1921, wher none nd highe bidder re gam he Dp ( E ’ f f atood oper twenty cays f n 0] a ere for een wand) acnre a bette } ‘ ’ ‘ ‘ e | Cras ne oY cLuabl: :;deration, gos Onin « . ’ Tw lg . BOO’ JY eee erent aioe lhatte einem :aiemtedt® an eatin ee Corim af 1oner North Caroltina,} Iredell County. WeH, Morrow V8. Lime Cola Bottling Co. { opationgs, | ; : oa male tied aet r navi Plaintiff and defendant sn titled setien ng in the ; a a aant having come ante, Gale ae | adjusted their difference 1s and 6 deren nike d raqui at you : ; ee | submitted to a voluntery NON-SUL ve ; + a tacleed } % f be It is, thereionre, ordered and ad jusgee that the pleintdt » end that he pa coat of non-suited in the above entitled action and that ne pay the the same, yitness He A, Har tneos Test An Soe Rh Tenement be baa r Up This November 21ste,s 1921.6 596 a North Carolina In the Superior Court Tredell County. Before the Clerk, HW Iredell County. ) Before the Cle at rR.V. Brawley and Pp. FP. Dulin ) REPORT OF COMMISSIONERS. BS ) ) ; ) ) ) ) ws ORDER CONFIRMING SALR. Cavin G. and M. A. Gavin JPERI OR COURT OF IREDELL COUNTY: we This cause coming on be heard upon the report of the oom- S,ott, Jr., the commissi anpointed by the Court : : missioner and it appe ring to tne Court that the commissioner exposed and deed for the forechdasure of the land t asale at the Court Ilouse door of Tredell County on the 2nd day | shows to the Court: ; of November 1 hen 2n where jade avin | ame the last and highest orders of ti bidder ‘or same at the price o 1! ). and that said «4 stood open the 8th day ; for twenty cays from the aati ereof and th missioner has been umable Court House doo to secure a better bid, and | .ppearing that Wade Cavin, for valwable consideration, as assigned his bid to RnR. V. Brawlev and P. P. Dul and in the opinion of the comaissioner the price « 312,600 is a fei and reasonable price + said sale be con- Savin srovided |} | 4 y ; : i : } i ed i the comsuissioner is lirected to execute a aecd conveying the land nt of the purchase not accepted dvanced bid. a cole ae .. Hartr /— Superior Qo the Superi efore the be North Carotina,} Iredell County. | Before the Clerk. ee peat ae r | W.H, Morrow "7 \T * Wrermertiurrrar. wi IDs ie DGI [ENT ) VS. J ae Lime Cola Bottling Co. | > « anc her at , sonsiderationsys j | : : anc other able cc Plaintiff and defendant in the above entitled action having $12,500.00 bid for th land described in the + adjusted their differences and the defendent having come into Court end Dulin an R Srawley, and request you A ; submitted to a voluntary non-suit. make a deed for the said properss rr i It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged ‘thet wae phatneart be e entitled action and that he pay the cost ee % non-suited in the abov the same, e December 12th., 1921. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, JUDGMENT BEFORE THE CLERK, ! a In the Superior Court, ee ere noe ae of this action, and Before the Clerk, \ f 4 Connelly ++ ye + Vv coming to be heard before the undersigned Clerk of Decenber, 1921, the same peing the th day of December, 1921, and it apperre this a on was issued more than ten days December, and that this is an action uvon notes bgage, and is for the purchase money of the Lends | See “TradalTyT COUN. C3 Oure LPOSasLL OUN TY e 4 i + nerein act upon the | scond Mondey | | adiudged that the plaintiff recover Nannie T, Connelly, and Fred Ge | Dollars with interest thereok $ ~~ AL of November, 1919, until paid, D y W A A ‘ GC onne - 1y and Nannie T, Connelly, to Fred Deaton, to secure said indebtedness. furether ordered and adjudged that the mortgage deed given by WeAe to secure seid indebtedness, be foreclosed and land 1. and to that end, H E,Lewis be and he is ise hereby appointed a nm, > sell said lands deseribed in seid mortgage deed, at public auction, at the court house door of Iredell County, lorth Carolina, to the highest bidder, for cash, and convey the same Wy n purchaser or purchasers in fee simple, first advertising the same for thirty days in some News Paper published in Iredell County. ordered that said Commissioner sell said lands on Mondey Januery 16the» North Carolina,} Tredell County. } = 7 a Ae hie £10 Tiand WSe Darr ols ¥ Gertrude 3 APMIIMEN T arcume:nye a 5 mn AIT ~ £ + J0OUrt an found as a Tacvu OL South 28 of counsel, i In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, et OE EE AE OM we oO iad - coming on to be heard and being heard before alu both plaintif and defendants betir 1e Oo counsel and after hearing the evidence Vil ordered:and adjudged by the the lands the creek; 2 poles to a stone; thence South } + oy 5 x } t ay) ne ovevwecn further >t ¢ meade L 1a dividing line between the plaintiff and defendants the defendants, ther ordered by the Court that the County permanently mark the line as herein indicated; Beginning the creek and 1z 3 32 viest 7-1/2 poles to stones! referred to as shown on the map hereto attached; ) thence a cherry tree, as the true dividing ‘ine between i the plaintiff and defendants, It is further aggilaged. that the plaintiff pey the costs of) August Pist., 1921 ¢ ft J. A.Hartness eee Clerk Superior Courts. — \ > SAO ok | i | In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk, — January 9th,, 1922, North Carolina,| In the Superior Court, Iredell County. | Before the Clerk, crawford-Bunch Furniture Company VS. F,.B,Whitley, Fred Salmon, J.M,.Vins and H,H. Johnson, individually and as F,B.Whitley and Company. + This cause coming on to be heard before J.A."artness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Tredell County, and it ® summons in this action was issued on the returnable on the first Monday in January, January, 19223; and it appearing further we a verified copy of the complaint was filed in this December, 1921, and that the summons served on F,B.Whit ~ + os > and hata _<T £ ¥ e Johnson on the 17th day of December, 1921, and that a copy of th $ P+) aaic and i sonearing further that was delivered to each of the said and it sppearing th ‘} sTOn4 fad 7 wey ” a Jemur ne said flefendants have failed to file a verified answer ol to demur to t } nd day Tanuary, same being the 9th day complaint on or before the sec na day in January, same g ‘ . : a notified so to do in the of Januery,1922, as required by law anc as notified so to t summons, And it appearing further that the cause of action is based upon a promissory note: nd adjudged that the It is therefore, eonsidered, B.W uM. Vinson and H.# plaintiff recover of the defendants, F.B. Whitley, J.M.Vinson and H.h. 3 ; Join g ss ur rp the Johnson individually and as partners trading and doing business undet } Yr & « 1 firm name and style of F.B,Wnitley and Company, the sum of $458.75, with 1 1 interest on said amount at six per cent per annum from April 1, 1921, until paid and for the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, Witness my hand, this 9th day of January, 1922. J, A.Hartness Tlerk Superior Court.