The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1911-1913 r of s+ Ay Cour + v Qn } Vour rior une Q ,a + iE erm 3 - 10 . 4 oven) er r . + Cou oo! a) D he » £eLaurhl Sao Vi e Tish 4 d and law ; Se > - » ‘ i = oO < = o - 5 ‘ . + = 3 D ‘ - cE a ** Gs = > - oOo a Per = 4 ‘ - oO ° . > o a se ‘ =< > ao > ws wa aio ; = ? = . > D+» => wo i Ms -4t © PA? Ort 2 4 3s nw ° + = @. Ww -Be oY oa .4 tT YO HH OSS K+ * @ N-+ri $2 +H 42 4) | f4 4 hy te > & 3 2 a) Ont C€ 2 or omc Hen a ct + ©o 8 U2 Sy _2 ff Oo Y Own’ oco D : - ¢ - a O > ¢ + v mH 027 UV 6 rt PS a ce a ‘i servic lor Tc C+ ew fi. - 2 ©¢ ® cS a +a ord os Mv AVOY 1910, drat 7 oC? »_ covey @ A QQ = OWSwHect ¢@ Ont it Orr Q - ka ‘ << "> Sy + ant. + °o e oO 1 co a rs a ot - T-+riA-ritt % 3 i @ 1 t+ Ov b> w . x 4 swt eg « ¢ | - on en ~ ~2 — As ec ¢ <j ios .- -- q; a yy ¢ a, gp 53 arc oO % °o | oC oie ‘ , = ay c wit: her oo) to;re 100.09, oO! 2t aa da GQ dived tw asn an ale sale, ale, Uv © ~ 4 ° = of yet} A uli + fa ® iw “ n vai L491 ¢ Tidsaie + Vi LLLa a "aj 0} Vas 445 and ¢ T ) 5 +2 ‘ » 2 os 4 et oO 2 D wo re 5 3 > ty O 4 ; co ~ ba oS cS wo js ~ © 3 eo + Db o + » oe : ; Ss » o he uw o . oO i ® S = ee 2 Ps be eg oe = c 2 ‘ee aa - SG S cv ; ret . w a ; co Cc 4 o 4 } ~ ai r Ua ~ “ a 4 , < . ‘ o ° S ; 3 : a . : oe oe -3 = S Oo ~ 2) — or ; S > $ 42 %4 D zz xz 3 + a . ba - “A v —- = Me ry A’ o e os ~; ® o o - v Tc > oO << 1 v 3 S +4 > Oo + A [ Aa v “ eq * . » C ~ = ¥ 4 “A 3 - - = 2 ; S wa 3 wo - a = u ‘ © S ® . > = vo a : ~ 4 ‘ . ‘g 2 “| ‘ o Ss = + S va . ° ® 2 “4 c 6 . on vi } D Ja > . { s +2 = ee Oo ‘ 2 t » wo +2 + > « Sh : oO SS o x oO D > ‘ L me ee 4 « » . ‘ é . ay oe et £ : : a ~ 3 + 4 es ct = 4 -~ , % - > =~ we = w ° > c3 m - = x - co w a =: - cS ° — o wz 4 < a — 5 NV > =< > -« oe co c » » a » c w +2 > > ‘ os 3 - bird > Pa oS > o ; t « , os ‘ r4 ‘“ ee “4 2 - cS “A ’ Js : — <i ; - cms 7 so Se rm ce om ee te VU ry a D Ov lea «We + 4 a ed 4G44 hase? Carl ” « Orne 7 ~~ “ee c 4 avi ae ene Ua Y 4 rae Ve eft At fenda: a ny a o 0ac ” Zc el lre e a a ao oore cS ot nn Jd et pleads } ayes ended Veroe2zct ~~ eiledafor Ja va 94 74 Ae ae \ aef enc llewed vU¢ art a 4 & O 0} ty A. Oo . d ’ ear . ‘ foamy o a : S 4 2 ° i 4 ® é o . Se a 3 a t yy > =<t > @ - * . » ed +2 << +? - cs - os << oo > - , ~~ rs « Sy r a) re) +4 oO 42 ®” og 5 - r> rd ° ’ a > -2 - & 4 S c ° ® &, —{ at > = > a © 1 1 u L ® te +4 c ® be Oo w “4 - Pq Sa ol = > » . = 3 » > - — — +> “ . a » : 4) ‘ te ~ pe Nese ~~ » av + vu adadjournmeyr U accoraing, ° + 4 D — » + +> c ; ; > wv <= <4 oe ‘ ta ; So ry s oO 2 sa 4 Met and lawful (Oo0od followir yi ' v 0: the names ar «- ond - — D> > . 2 < oe . “4 = . . : Oo ~Y - + a ~ ms ter Lat a . +2 v4 PE o ot > » Sa ® o > oO oo < = < »> c —t <s a S4 o £ + ) & @ ty z 2) r ’ “Loa ” 1s Lins aahad re e imposed r ofo YarYre ~~ + ty - moosed + re ovr his aod Sa » Cine ae r a D . 2 { * va > 1 Cc 4 « << » »v @ < war a2enu 0 a vad S o pt 4 + ER RT re Es we = — TES, tle OLlow , *? ohnson rf 4 v find ct Say tney verdic neir + u or e 4 . © me 4 © = ws S © as follows. tnem to . Judsre Presidin;. contract? of wa Slo u nelléd oO U ° 3 m4 : oS - w D 9 SS t - : £ 2 ~ . c 4 re) 4 Oo ¢ < 2 i > $4 +2 3 : 2 qo = ad a ” A a o . = cy aa) -~ > = i ty < ad Q - C Oo c , i o , > 2 UC ~ Dv < . 4 4 3 oS - > 7 - + ~- ¢ C +? cs ~~ 2 & sa v Q 4 “) » — hy a wv cw "5 < : : o- > +2 cg » c ¢t < ¢ 4 a wi >= a 4 as < : o 2 ty “g a - + . - : a 2 tu <a +? oC 2 = v +> u a alt ~ ’ i Caiz 61 = sav r nar + u a c ACu. defendant's ewart 2 n : ; ® a games a eo oo = = a ft } 4 . et - a e 3 ey x = =. ‘ So ge ag S ol : ty - 2 > ¢ a TC a sy si - — 2 2 ‘m . & ~< ° i 2 c o « a. D Dd “> fy a wn © Q ‘'o c a ~ = . 4) os rm : 7 3 i 2 = ee a a : q D «4 C 5 A = t oS > ‘ . : ny eo A 3 oO oO a fy ee a TC Oo . c re D 42 - t b- oo ® a D 4 D 4 = ~ - c a Oe oe 3 4 a : $ tu = é 2 a : ; : = 7 r> oS : 3 = > Ge a " eo a > . a ° £ A ae > S, ° i . . ot ha so ol . r co D oO = $ ~ D - vy x GH h me <= ; G KH % + Oo cs u ¢ = hy oO <a “4 2 ° - 3 +? oO 4 © ‘ s: 3 » . co a . : +2 OQ : oS Ss . 2 2 S 4 ; = 2 * a 6 © ha “a a u 3 cs oO 3 at Ss = a] a - 3 © © o “A oO s c > Oo “4 D oO @ a 0 ; ¢ +4 S +? | ce : a} > ~l CS rt vw . 4 eo » tea Se - = o N > an —) >> = _ > = os ° — &- = ye 2 _ ‘ . t+ a 9 3 -* Pramecsecegnene a Syer Ss : ; fie laren erneareage on -_ a ie aoe : = = cs = eee -tardner Company “ Ke. ~ al remove 1d] t 5 Y Richmond Yoduce and Continued. lt is ordered be retaxed. poell allowed to allowed be allowed to JuUarmnens ruled defenday: of appeal waived. rovision Company. Ourt overeruled defendants exceptions. ‘ned the judgement set cefendant excepted and appealed to the Supreme Court. Appeal made in open Cout. Notice of appeal waived. Appeal bond fixed at “25.00 and 20 days -iven defendants to case on appeal and 20 da‘s thereafter allowed lain- - exceptions ad file counter-case on appale. Ct. rior Cour Qy) 1e@ Supe . ry — 4 1911 s1erm m ary se Janu stor iby. "\, i tlon ie rial + v Knieh Y Cr + plaintiy Vee 0 the + x Deals dant aefer ShuaQcaiheye erm oO! ‘ 4 Y + h ay tnis neard 2 aid eler: a 4 -” cS ~ at fy & a c A +? 2 > $4 + : - o 3 - es < + D my ae So © — ee d;rd wG 7 -” ~ D 5 a , co °o rs. w © << Co 2 °o S wad 4 3 © a > <s 4 “ 2 2 te S. ; orde “4 r r Ife, a uarre aya a e + cS 4 ° ‘ wm t> w . 2 be a < ® > “> 3 So raul <3 3 : a °o rt - 3 i> ay ¥ J + a » 24 o . ~ » oO & °o vy u ael ia Ww 2 73 Ue to wi tn va S4 nd 43/109 dolla 9 i WO aside verdict. Ce . ~y UV pial. qi ar;re a + e . dne Uils co a4 m4 o ivor nh and wn io » 2 . t4 3 < ° C r » 7) 6 ‘ < = N Dv 42 +2 ‘ - m4 2 3 C ? ° > ) 4 ‘ * oO os 4 » + oO oma A - ri J O- J 3 : » . > > » a ® _ 3 = & °o 2 the 18sues a over e eed and » 2 tv Se ae “% ® 1 4°4 44 plainti sum of nsidered credited co he Apo _ ? . ~ v q 4 Z : 2 3 x fe) 2 “ar » ae > > « 4 he ® = “4 nex ce} $ 2 3 3 S ~ mm . i > a na = oO _ oS a o a 2 <wooono a : ¢ . 2 o . D : D aH & Ye ® 2 : ' v a . 5 te - > tu GH 253 Un ha by ye oO a @® ° @ i ¢ 4 Pos) . Oo ~4 : @ > os = ° - ° - : 3 f ie 2 “ — : ‘ 3 £ a O22 4< 3 o ® a) ) ¢ 4 a 7" fn we - = me ot ~- . . D A SS “ a i? n + n . > ; ‘ 3 Ay v cc a °o SHA HDAGS os at = t4 - Co c3 o QV ss D mrs oS c z 4 » > r [> Hi + ; > - ws + tp t » » = ‘ > 4 C 5 (US a S — PONS : 4 GS 7 a $y c3 +? - > < + Sy ord 3 >) ; +> = C2 cw > KH 3@d «aQe 2 > seed an co + 3S oat + r cS o wz > ev 3 S SS t) ® wd rl ! 4 be a $4 rat i os oc GW 1 : ' “4 3 aD - 3 @ ”Y fF w< n + > > & S C 585 = : + vo © ws A POMGH ¢ > @ G-A-e w o°o > o £3 . + -4 Ss oy Oo 43 ty e w) cg +> Co o 4 Po FH LE wo * onvd hy | aos; si 3 3 3 ? B-H o Sy tl °C 2 > A-r x S ty = et CO ‘ » ?” SC ° — $ ce c3 Zsoce A [zy S {td -vDOs nS a) o— - ~ Peed 5 3 > v2 rH - PHM OVOn @ 3 : ~ soe c iy Od > & ded = 2 o> is 8D ° + ©) D< ° 2 4 ® oe 9 Oo SH i mr) EH . : 3 of 3 ged o Of QD AH Oy « ¢ eS a Boe A vA POnA 7 ¢ Agdaa ha fs Es —— > _ ; > cs Di D ° — - Yh EB «SQ: £ s oO 4 >t G4 ot “41 J oa arto £ 3 s D» oH He aomdowv a Oo cS 3 $4 ” ow rtrd 2 2 ° a j v S hy SsSUvYVP A& as » As aed Vv SM Sard % O--4 : - ® 3S @ --rt-:- +2 < hy aad. we ‘ . : a & QO Sa fs $4 Sd o Oonvrnai: - is , c —+ vovo a : aed roe ~~ 2a 2 “A 5 Bs he oO = as & ts = 4 Ss 1S) c Wei » + = ‘ oo oO . o 24? 2 C WOrt+ 4 > a a ee 5 : . oe DM 53 ~ > SS @® s; csaeonr ‘ : rc 2 or - £ ~ Gat o< m4 » 5: £i <g + “+ @ : ° 2 Bs | = ° : na 3 Sa Qo = G4 42 = et = “he ‘ 2 si a o oso a fy 2B oO re ? r ‘ ; « a , : va . ‘ : 3 " od 3 a4 x ae - os © eg +4 = " = E 2 os = +> a4 va 3 » @ as t 3° » #3 <3 © ° > . . < cs 9 Iso o aw £ 28) 5 ; : re a = wn rf ; $< a < r . : 2 > od Ow st . 2 > , Oo ss » » 4 3 ae i a oS @ ce a os os d ak . + v ow + + uu all rt. - s. oa < ai “et — , : u J QO e. ne 3 rt <3 C v t+ x 2 = » ty : wD - 3 o - = ~ iit c a ; ‘ 3 v4 4 ° va 1” © < ‘ + = ty ‘ > ° 3 Ms 4 a ? } ; 4 = rt +? 1 » . os . ‘ a 9 4a “ 3 ty r 1) ¢ : C 3 ‘ + - Ly { » 4 ‘ oO os , @ 3 3 < - 4 C ° 7% t aad 42> a co +4 . » ® wl ‘ ; & 42 eo oS s . = -_ “At e> rt “— @ - Cc rt o yy and g a q aere AO od co ’ a SS a ee nee > . gee a? © ro <4 + ~ 1S . 4<« @®-r 4 $ 3 et + ra 7 4 ts G 2 tgdoagococre - « . a ~ Q « - Ort 5G > CS : o 4 D 5: $5 Se urd o 4 3 rf $ £ i aw Vit - tj. 8 {.o° £ 4 5 4 w % 1. OBPDOY >» “389 T ‘ ; D + OHH OSHS Dv Dv - “© 3&4 : , ai 4 $o out 4 0 ®D c - 5 O »sS oe Gh ©O% E . ‘ i eel E S 3 D ~ >> 2 Vv . 6 eo » 24 oe 3+? DH & Bvt Gi 54s ft & < oo +? - Ec 5 tS De-ri 3 a — ~ 2 : Zt D - Ss ¥ ‘ . - 42 fa ty -? O 2 oe 3 1’ + \ ; anua 4cno Ce ree y ‘ wt » t T vu “4 ea oO ined rLeé a 1 t ” , 4 be G . 4 > é wae 3$at wT suwwvt 2 ¢ 4 Oo OPMON KA VTH » 2 D c Oo wv t> wu > Go tr > 3 4 E +? e > oi » a4 © ~{ : 2 Do 2 DOG Sei O tract ~- te 4 3 2OW OO GU & D = $ 2 D2 30 ®D » 0 : - ic - « y ~ % > S + ri ‘ o. »D wi «hie Qo UH» $4 »oHiw W > min H oO 44 Sa , as ct + 4 s 3 » oO Se te > 2 > > s fw > 3 : 2 e ~ > 2 y ee > - 4 7 * + ~ o - oa a Co ~ 2c . OC 42 4d v « 3 e QD - od aA >» wo Ss . x S ~ Gi wD ta = a & no set 3 es 3 ce =. 6+ ’ t+ @D 2? St > _ -< 4 ? : r4 i -rt 4S ; ¢ oh to's +? Q > 2 : < ae ns & s ae0 His : ib Le ram ' d Sd . 4 Wt fh 7 ‘ ’ g J © f he 3 93 Dw al ae | vo © @® rc hy et > e . 7 - PH O54 2 SS So: ) cs > @ GS uw a > YQ + 30 t oO wv RS) 4 S °o 3 ‘ oe EO “ss © oO & ~~ Ud ©. ¥ + & ~ Dd - S$ - Ort Or rt, Sy Oo 9° i. © 30 Y + +1 . > vd L Ja G+ a eri DO > I +4 40 <o ~~ D- ag t& £ 2 2 «1 7 & Dw v ’ a MS OS TO + “a Py 4 vo i 4) &3 ty ort +? ct 5 ® 4 >Oow @& D-ey & O ‘ DvD $a by =f = Oo fy ) a — . — ; %) 4) : ‘ Saat D 2 ig rt 2 ov J I De a b ¢ 1h Os - o . > © - - . Ors oc > Ja y 2 art > + SS ft + ri - 4 ~ @ 4 +2 ; rm ar oe | > ®@ 6 a .) ‘2 jf ooos - 42 Ia ‘ ®-i 1 3+ KD “> > 2 & .UW-- h& et » 4 3 D 2m oO 3 ui $s : i 1 - : BS ; © - © ——ri @ @ ii ri ®O+w te > ® + mi Uri ht ” ci > + > Ce ee LCotd oad So uw > 4 4 » 2 2° — {ion "S wa , =| t+ 1 2 Va o Go = “ + So «3 © Gd Gs »>*s So by 4+ oS U v 7 ‘ ‘ : cys > : » i 4 ‘ ) c 2 1 + 3 3 > oO YM 4 - ¥ t41 4 3 “Gar ‘ 4 4 1 OY-ei DW ua @ ouU Q cS 2 @ “ é 5 4c ont . “4 ‘ . = a et Bow» > » 0 “ “« >‘? 3 3 I-44 Het ae ee » 3 5S 2 $ ~ © + 1d @ +> ~- + S > 5 Yovusd q+ 2 5 } 3 - & D+ 4 = a * =~ UC 1 DS 4 3 S ord + Oo ‘ So Oo n : o Ss - » 1OoOoOoqgd ws & 3 a ® ®» 4 ‘ tk. oO @ 3 $ . 4 f $+ o Sa Ja oS. 3 2% Ord wo « Se TK ~~ c a Oo -r4 Co os Se Oo 5; > > 1 cet Ss & 4 Db Vv - > casei h 14 - > 4 3 > 429 » 4 v2 e 4 > @ , 3 +> - @qQ > jz » @ + <= @ + > © ¢ ac w S @ ced =. = > = > : n= $ 4 3 4f wYreiw @was ¢ $14 & $s s U © $ ~ te - ®> ® $+ > v + » rf ei NV ~ “- 1 - +4 ‘oo 3s wu S -r4 o> @ , 4 f t ce ‘ t4 Wi Be o ‘ é 3 . oO x + @ 4 CO to 290 4 t+ + 3 2 30s °o > > + = + & » vv» DY 4c 4 o - 3 $+ oe © - wa 2 as a 2 @ ed @ n+ VW 4 »> ‘ 3D ws os >t © oO + wo ->n2 3» 3 > Oo qo $ i 2 4 £ w os t= Fs : wo te 4 ws ° 3+ v3 4 & © os lanl ‘ ‘ > @ > | - - - aa > t+ wo @ > , 4 oQ oo @ ‘ | 4 4 4 » - Se 3 3 vy D> $ v 4 > 3 4 4 4 4 s Se ‘ 4 oo o¢ 3 a 4 4 s - e ‘ Sa 3 t. » 2 Ss “a a oa» » » 2 os ? + > » . 5 s @ os 3 ts By 4 La + 4 : 7+ - ; +> -2 @ 3 4 at - o 4 o > 24 sts wodsd -« wo t& @ a o > oo cs S 3s 4 dt > E - @ eos . 4 > bt ‘ wy lo? 2 w + BO fe 2 ° o2 +4 o D % > 4 Oe oe ae es ; +45 $ 53 ct oa 4 ft, o © a B12 @ » od >» 2 > 3 Ss +? v ‘ ES Go ot - D> ‘ t $4 ‘ v 3 Oo S4 3 4 4 D . St, 2 ao oO a t n ‘ 3 > ; i > Ot & © ‘ va + . > ’ Js + » >> . 3 4 ro ‘a £ ty : a 4 @ vd oe . D>; 4 - <S > S¢ : rf 3 be cg g 3 ve - 4a Oe s> $4 $ @ 20 a4 a ° Oo > 2 J ) >C > 3 coe 3 $4 “A 0 a J S » 4 <4 «¢ Q-rt > fa - D+ 4 Oo - ¢ ® —4 pce oe : 3 >> S ‘ rca tC “4 oY ya ve > +4 2 2 o © . a D-- © © pee ~s v ‘ es - ‘ o asBOU by Dt 4%: Uv 44 CG POs wu -s Dt wPgert «Hv A a4 > i 3 ¢* © a o > aort .v = . age - '. - ot Be ea a 4 Sloe = t S D-ri +, 2 +) of wg 5 ‘ + v¥uO A © a4 : i ae e r me +4 lv 1+? Ss & o> = en Ss e+ “6 ‘ » D ‘ oT “+ 4+? 4 ? oS be > . q fe . i ‘ . « 2 ' - 3 ~ v me +4 be nt — = “= ™ De © SY <4 3 : V9o7 0 aoe ss oo = i w- ®m® OF ra wa ? 1 vw co UG G : -~° + ot + -¢ -* + ~ - < . = = 7 “oS -~ 3% 2 DvD UE +> v > . ]) haGing, and follows: ‘ea presidalrcyg b appeariny: to the pls { kd fendant have, 72 UNG 1? : ) se e Rens lifference ou ; COUP, 1 anount agrreec upon: , therefme, considered and released, aid that the defendar jaerk oO ; Ss Coury. aes oie @lnp , vee com! ont e heard and a ety pene 5 Bites lige ae eee Goma eere ‘st ,y refore, Fs Uv taxed aj QO! wu ( { yr £ ] pLeainti ilure Si called t UlG, Oraerec ‘8 OT ti act € ~ Ng ae Fe ae EA Oe Saag rane a capeaeener enroute ooeentinese- moana Ai dereteatieeniatene ed, ce VW 31Q8, ra, 6 « « ara oe ordered 7 said de 1 é ap pe os . "dered forfeit iS Q2 2Ke } taat at a Superior eS ee ee y of Iredell on the lltn Monday after the Count ne same Deine ws wend day ne) whe and wher: Naren, ¢ ¢ nna t Ae an. Lyon Was present rn presided, vVewe + eee erate ~ 1 ee present and prosecuting J.i. Deaton Higa Sheriff of Iredell County, vanes of the followin ood and lawful men term, toewlt: BH. Beaman, A.A. Honeycui, P.! J.M. Ricsert, J.¥. Petevst, James Shar; Wm. LH. White, Ww, Colson, J.D. Kestler and y, Clark wae Abandonnent Ca Abandonment, Capias and continued. iiicon teaches Sn renee - ‘ 4 4 fe} > ° oO ‘ 4 . 4 - > rt ‘ ~ $ fe > Dv D = bo oS o 3 Dv 3 s 4 : 3 3 3 : 3 > . . - ta ww Co! Ss e . . e ° 3 . by te Me saad D> D> > + 2 o s 4 > 4 r4 ~ » a > > > + 8 3 s 8 . ® ) » ‘@ = 3 3 “ood a rO0U 0 a > V ‘ ~ Capia . 2 2 4 v2 2 3 ov 3 3 3 % x z Y ~ . $ $4 f4 $4 ¢ : ¥ x x a 3 S © 1 ® 1 a - 4 ‘ et ¥ ‘ ow a a a ft. - - 3 . - = at = = 2 a +2 - 4? 4 So sc et 2 +? 2 a > a » 2 = So 2 - cS = - 3 a : # Q 4 © > oc 4 o o c a wo = 4 a . a c 4 = °o = La os <= 3 » “+ = < ‘ 2 3 4 > 4 rc » 4 a) @ > * ~ 1 «> 2 2 2 42 - > M4 4 > - - oy 5 =) °o - 3 u - os t4 - 3 4 4 ~. - oe . > : 5] ° ~ oo = 2 $ + ° Qo +> wo @ > > wo 4 o +> » 3 e o s o wa =: u > e ts u > b c “a 4 u FS c bm c Qa ~ <= = so aA o “ay Zo ao) « c a a o ied. + . ' y \ 8B. Capias a t 9 Alexander County e ook's. +3 co 3 ot a - = $ : © 3 + 3 + ab oO pe a DP 2 +2 > . 2 4 2 / Cay da ‘ fini a z 0 ine Lo Cat yior, Lic d Piatt Attemtin;r Willia Will Pattergon Rufus Fletcher Plea guilty, agetendant pay One-half the costs, ws ch evans . States Ni Sei followin- jury: » Keller, P.A, Shinn, ° wv , Ke 2y a ice Giller, C.¢. '.A. Campbell, n, David “ebler C.c. Parke, ell »ein Juror witndraws is ordered e of #10.00 eacn, n urt that It is adjudged by tne Cou v ; yn one P& of $10.00 each, and eac mi ttin 4 e+ 4" ary Reavis. Permittin: distiller on the same bond. Larceny, Plea A.M. GeprielL, F.M. David Fox, S.%. Tomlin, Sherrill, J enpanelec «Ws Rickard Dixon. is actio Mfg. vo, 14 Stave ae ry OT far he judem vy + rr Guilty. spended, » Plea ~~ A is Aa Wilcox. A ve Ma 4 an n ana judzme ’ “4 Oo +? ne Solici ’ 1 ° gored Ili. ° , 4 aa t3 os ~=s a ne om > «> ar - 22 os 2 ° > te =~ : = x ° “<A ra <3 tay +> ey = > nu - tw a ws oe 3 4 4 - < 9 © °o ¢ te . reed ® * : °o I s: s » cs ° a Ss Ss) im) oa GD * 4 re a Ad =< ~ c © D ° ° ~ ce . ° J a 9 - aa | et my o c et ~ = aia e ® 4 . = “A D u o -~ s by °o te CS od oc wi $4 ~™ » ; 3 °o G ~ a = S ° oe . 3 3 Ss > oO 2 eS 3 : - ca . - S ; * CG o & . ft ® @ 4 Se 2 U ° oH ‘ 3 — -~ > oe D + = ° a ee) 5 Be n eo . : * 4 th a oOo tS cS : o . oP] . 3 iy oe © : oe “ - - °o . <a od “4 yp ie 7 ie a » d ° n > 3 Q “ + 3 A <a 4 2 ‘ : et - A “ SS e : @ oo es % 3 = st) - © ed 4 me ° 3 o a : A ‘ a “~ <)> = © oo > ee * = * “A a © : 3 a o tx = “~ Ge a ‘a 4 ° > A a = U uy we 7 at a = 4 ae 4 : rd H) ° = . 4 . ae ag _— & a= 4 > 2 ; = +2 a cP a . oo «at a at o . a4 A. ‘ ° 3 ? _ ~ + 7 a oO = 42> ’ «<< t> e A. 9 4 - . oO 4 ' » Ly . go ws A. 3 > Vv a) . r= oS - 2 S| St eS te » : 3 ° wo pa @ ° , wo “~ : S ° - . s ° 4 2 2 o = » . a . — “4 . ~ = 4 3 ; be => o 3 w @ Me . a 4 . oO ° c ad 3 5 < uD a = a. +5 4 ; 4 ~ : +4 4 4 » oe 4 2 p , > 1” — 4 - =f ‘ | . 4 . g ~ ° i ° ) C4 e ¢ ° . a 4 > ° ’ 2 3 wv > > C . : > cS c MAY 23, Leads 2ts according to adjournment at vs. behavior. under fomer d, Chambers Spann. Larcenc’y. ot guilty. A Fa Lt } - Abernathy, David Fex, S. L. Tomlin, GC. Parks, Il. Snerriil, J, heine sowrn and empanelied for how -ood behavior. YQ) Y find the defendants guilty. ruyer continued. It is orde defendants give bond in the sun appearance the next term of enavior case. oltsclaw. consent of the Solicitor and Of indictment is changed so at tate's witness was called tresspass and not Larcency and } : : = On) : foreciah +y ‘ aca it is ordered by the Court foreciable tresspass. not allowed to prove any attendance ai this Court. ietailing. Plea cuilty. a valled anf failed. ortra-ed property ") The following jury: L. Kellar, oston, their My . ray. red this . foreciabvle .ecevin;. lea cuilty d capias. Called anf failed. Jud ment ni ci sci fa tate 0. ll. vs. » Tudwick. Retailing. Plea -uilty. udmnent suspended upo) he 1 Tahn Be WV ; oun | ie ve ae ; case. | | a RS 7 c 7 @ "Ss m Cc ; A. . Dew, Plea not suilty. ‘he following jury; vayment of the cost of this A ih ae fhe tie OOGIN, _ it. hephard, J. A. aymer, J. , i i fickery, ". “. Johnson, 2. Kk. Kohinson, DID. h. Rarnherat llz ; we 0 & ihe r, I. “aurh, J. U. Lamprecnt, J. *. Owens, ©. A. Hudspe:) ee oy Waey tats ah nd Campbell - sworn and e od fan tbat 1 ’ Gio As VeNpPoes. Velie sworn and ep dled for their vs . we : ’ E mil oy i verd.ct say they find the defendant not mpuilty, : v. Tudwick. etailinr. Plea muilty. ud;rment suspended upon i i | ohn F. 4 the cost of this case. lud case. ayMona “Pawn. Attemptin: to reck train. Ple ema?) ie 1 U rayer J Tudi >K t +h rt udwick. etailinr, Plea ;uilty. it is ordered by the Cou she C f vfs Tudwie) ‘etaili — ens upo: defendant pay a fine of *500 and the cost ° _ Retailing. Plea cuilty. Jud-ment suspended upo" he givé is aa hat 6} at er? It is also ordered )y the Court tna o» 1B Lh: payment of the cost of this case. bond in the erm 1912 of this Co ‘aS not violated the prohibition laws of the sum of ‘ ay “looo/oo for his appearance . he rt and Sc © now to the Court that State. Cvtail m payment e . of Plea guilty. the cost of Judgment suspended upon this case. C Shinn, Kellar, verdict iamblin bnat the Cost of the following jury: aoriei, F. . Abernathy, We 2. Kellar, D David Fox, S. L. Tomlin, &, LU. Poston, ‘ Vor ¢ ’ oO} a4 T ’ e Farns ai . nerr hak as Johngon and anphell \ei Ssvorn and empanelled for their say they find the defendant not fugity. - ULEtY. D@ confined to term of 3 Plea cuilty. he confined roads of Iredell County during sonmenyv, lt is ordered by the Court ‘ Plea guilty. efend , the cefendants pay a fine of $10 ama each and this case, * tate vs. jave MeBride. esecca Alliso: ary Allison Toulsa Allison David Fox, J. L. Retailing. Plea not ruilty. The following David Fox, J. Tl. Shepherd, J Raymer, *. Johnson, }. U. Lamprecht, sworn ad enpanelled for their the defendant -uilty. ihicious injury ersonal property. ni 61 eci fa and c etaili: Plea not ruilt: shepherd, J. Ob lI ISON, . OWens and empanelled for ¢} find the defendant not ruilty. smoking is adjud:ed in contenpt be confinégd an adjournment = ts Tae ae er Sr Fee. = — = gem r ad a la ct RBC LET ee = : Z = ret ean ° al rancor Ag A Te enn re ee -—-: according to adjournment at 9:30. s Larcency. rood, ‘Ullty havin~ heretofore been ' ‘nat he pay a fine of this case. and empanellec for he defendant ruilty. aeferndant @e confined tne cost ofr A plea of cuilty havin Prayer continued mong Lspeeblipa ec ne SS ae = eke ee “ Assault wit} ent to connit rape. Defendant pleads he lilty of sim; ssault. It is ordered thi i ee ‘ | “A at " ERIE pay a fine of “50 and the cost of id the cost of fuilty havine heretofore been made . = Attempt Sika ta i ‘ine e Court that the defendant pay a fi followin ‘ . i “yrther ve ~ : ‘ ay 4 " of tris action. It is furtne Sliar, P n, Davi Ox, n in ) «+ ” ' DD: « M Sh ria Court that the defendant cive bond 4 Peston, MK. Kellar, .C. Parks, 1. S. Sherriil, uv re i Qle * this T t } ey . ‘ } ing sy » 2 a panellec of “S00 for his appearance May Term 1vlé< of ve Re Johnson and". A. Campbell being sworn and enpa vourt and show good hehavior. Tor their verdict say they find the defendant guilty of : i eae at . flmple assault. It is ordered by the Court that he Pay a fine of “+ and the cost of £4, 19il. . . 4 Ge 4 } Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:50. A, ! Larcency. ) rr 4082 rot mogin, J. 7.. hepherg is : A plea of cuilty havin heretofore been o Tuther Feimster. C. Johnson, 1at he pay a fine of ne as ae Lamprecht ig oe we Ts As Owens, A Camphely being SOwrn and empanellec ¢ they firg the def eft @nda) , a fi ali Uilty. the Court Chat t} C@Lfendant Jail of Iredell] Cou +5 assir euilty navine hereto ordered | 5 ‘ourt that the defendant pay and the cost of this case. ¢ civil calardar £ court, , muilty hnavine hereto Praver continued om fi } : ‘ * intent to comnit rape. 5 nple assault. It pay a fine of ay) made ; ’ havine bh ofore peen ™ tA plea of rpuilty having heretofo : udilty. ordered by the Court that the defendant It is furthe? ‘bernathy ~9O andthe cost of this action. ss ~ 3 ‘F ! ‘“e Shinn, David t ¢ i “ : , Vi © t cive bond 1" va the Court that the defendan ticle ty ‘. Kellar, Ve ee Tomlin, R. f. nen + C. Parks, f.. Ss 8 rid si tray Sera 191le OF im ’ ner: Ail, ‘S00 for his appearance ia) “+ Johnson enc ¥. A, c bei 1 * Ae Campbell Pe@ing sworn and eipanelled v havi for the; show food behavior. oo : ict say; y fin he d | t sa: they find the aefendant Sullty of “lnple . &@Ssault, it ig ordered by the Court thet he Pay a ty, , | & fine of 4: and the cost of this action, x not - wulilty. The followin- . L. Shepherd, J. R. nebingon, ] U. Lamprecht, J. A, Owens, C. beil ebign sworn and empanellec find the defendant guilty. It is ordered by shat th “endé he confined t he comuon jail of Iredell Cou y r the term the public roads ©entence in ay their verdict say Plea aefe:.dan: © public roads of said county prisonment. : ; 't. Prayer for judgement. Prayer con >, le2 and les "tate -icnolson Mfo. Liquor. Continued for the State on account of Mf. yg absence of “tate's witness. As ce emoved to Yadki offence ‘raving occured in that county. heretofore rend judgment. term of this Court. the defendant rive a bond in + appearance at the next term of not euilty. The following jury: lL. Shephard, J aymer, J. , Vickery, tobinson, DR arrvhardt, J. L. Waugh, - Lamprecht, J. A. Owens, ©. “. liudspet’ and nm famphell being sownr and enpanelled for heir verdict say they find the defendants cuilty. It is ordered by the Court that Clarence King be confined to the common Jail of Iredell County for the term of 60 days and 38 assipned to the be worked on the public roads during tae term of his imprisonment. Judgment suspended as vo Slijah ‘illiams upon the payment of one half the Cost. lea not ulity. Th ‘eS Neeeti o “ne followin; Jury; Mfo. Tiquor. Continued for the State on account roodin, J. IL. Shepherd, J. A. Raymer 7 We . , i ’ - Haymer, . Vickery, absence of “tate's witness. Taknaoan 9 > "NOhine ry > 2 mw . Johnson, Z R. robinson, D, R arnhardt, J. J, ‘ Te ht weneg coe ‘“ . J, Lamprecht, J. A. Owens, C. | udspeth and beil ebign sworn and empanelled for their verdic: ind the defendant cuilty. at 32 ordered by hat the defendant 'e confined to the comuzon sg D emoved to yadki tor the term of 30 days and is : ’ of WJ Gays and is offence ‘avince occured in that county. public roads of Iredell Courty mprisonment. fhe time in e expiration of the sentence in tailings ihe jury verdict of cuilty. continued until the ordered fojlo Kellar, Kellar, nneld for their verdict say ault ee f W foc the defendant. SSauliv Plea cuilty. It is ordered ' ; oe Plea not euilty. The following jury: the defendant be confined to the cormon jail of Iredell ~~ - Goodin, J. lL. Shephard, J aymer, Jd. + ly tor the term of 12 months and is assigned to > he Johnson, 7 yhoingo R arrhnardt, v. vork on tie public roads of said county a) rine the term ; ' | | | : Lamorect oo Owens, ae lLudspevr and of his imprisonment. n . vamphell being sownr and enpanelled for heir verdict sa; they find the defendants cuilty. It is ordered by the Court that Clarence King be confined to the common jail of Iredell County for the term of 60 days and is arr - ~ ' . imbezzelment, Prayer for judgment. Prayer con , assigned to the be worked on the public roads during ‘ae term of his imprisonment. Judgment suspended as ‘0 slijah ‘illiams upon the payment of one half the Cost, 0 . te cyate tate mbezgzelment. Plea ruilty. judsment. Scena os ~ ——- 2 rr ~ “4 - tm <= o er. = - 3 - ct ~~ . —4 u Le | x ~ oO be pws Prayer continued, bl 2 ( > , oJ ‘ ~~ . : he F Ti rave Disturhine relirous worsnip. Plea not ruilty, at » followins jury;A. . Bnrie., fF, - Abernat’ Tr - iar, fs » Shinn, David Fox, S. ZL. Tomids alae \ } Vs. fohnson & : A. ampbell | i} Sworn and € anelled y : ° a a ike Dis . = ») — ‘ eo W uC $0 é Ga ° any ell im Worn and e i anélied lor arrisen gmith. mhbezzeime? i: lea uilty . Dy aver tox udement. | +l preyer continued. att Owens, CHoe ut j is 1) : - pA oo ‘fampheli beine sworn ard empanelled for their verdict cr + « 1 say trey find the defendant -uilty. It is ordered by i; | } ; ’ the Sourt that the defendant be confined to th: cogmo: i a jail cf Iredell County for the term blic roads of said Co ty during Plea fullty ° feamanheil b ine usp upon the payment of the cost. En AML ECH Uy, 4 ‘., Owens and f, Cainp . vO1 ana enpanelled r their Tr 3%t say the a @ ‘ou iad ea ‘ ¢ ss , ' rsd G panelled for their verdict sa) ourt now tekes a? adjournment until @ A. lh rsd defendant Witte. It is ordered by the ourt that “Y 6oth 192), es ais ' ; ‘ rigs action 2 it. the defendant vay fine of 6 ard the cost of thi FO D> 1 a ei ari , r made - -icks Retailing. ‘ plee of ruilty having heretofore Peer Va pr So rae : os nee vay @ - ™, Dyers t is ordered hy the Court tat the defendants pay yy ; 4090.00 fine of “2b each and «ive bond in the sum of "200+ are ; ne t and for their appearance at May Term 1912 of this cour : they have been of pecod behavior. AniV MAY 205 1911. vgnorable Court meets accroain™ to adjournment at 9 .A. MM. . g. Villiams. uisance. Plea not ;uilty. A. Be Goodin, J» i. | Shepherd, 7. A. \aymer, J. Vickery, ”, “. Johnson ?, R, Reobinsen, 1. yp Rarnhardt, J. L. Yaugh, J. U. . ' Lamorecht, J. 4. Owens, C. *. Hudspeth and ”. A. Campbell He Ii af ne sowrn and empanelled for their verdict say trey #1 es cae Se RA nn pM A at find the defendant not cuilty. L fay Vs. ‘111 MeLellard. ea Plea cuilty. It is ordered by the Court ig that the defendant pay a fire of S15 and the cost of this actl or. ajor Foote -Ulner Cain D> . . ain. ; Plea not cuilty. the f : uUry; hnson eli being sworn and empanelled for their verduct k the defendant Major Foote cuilty ani the defendant Turner Cain not cuilty Forciable tresspess. Plea ruilty. Prayer for judgment. irdered Pr- ‘ , . ‘ be : rraver continued upon the payment of tne cost. A ‘ourt that tbe defendant be reco;inized in the show + ana sum of $50 for his appearance at May erm 19le and hlS good behavior. ' + Artnue urdock, Retailinrc. les not euilty. Pao £6) owi ae tun, uw 3 mene Jury: A. Me. Gabriel, F. KM. Abernathy, WY. /] Aig aes 7oo0din eo aes She yherad J aed aymer T a : : 5 ieee Chinn, David Fox, 5. ua SOMA, RD no Moordison, “". ©. Johnson, ”. |“. Robinson, D, tT io . TI. Yauch, 7. U. Lamprecht, J. A. Owens, ¢ ludspeth and "’. A. Campbell beinr sowrn and emapnelled — ‘ + * for their verdict gay they find the defendant guilty. : by the | Prayer for judgment. Prayer cortirued upon the ayment of the cost of this case, and it is ordefed that the Retailin::. Plea not ruilty. The . rn Keller, C. C. Parks, L. S. Sherrill, follewing jur) K@iiar and PF. A. Vee Campbell being sowrn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the aefendant culilty. It is ordered Court that he be confined to the comuon jail of Iredell County for the term of & month: and is assirned to work on the public roads of Iredell County during the defendant sive bond in the sun of £100 for his appearance shoes term of hbs imprisonment. at y term 1l¥lze of this Court and show that he has beer Tay Gould Cook. 7e0 Cox. rendered in and continued. ‘| alf the cost of this action. ae re. pe ere = . not ;uilty. fhe following jury; ve. Raymer, 2.5 se | eS Shelton, ouse breakinr. Plea not Guilty. ‘« Je Morriso: os \rey C hnson, 2%. hie leon, « Arey, 7. C. Jonnson, A. M. Jabriel, F. ¥. Abernathy, W, I r David, Fox, S. L Temkin, 2. L. Posto being sowrn and empanelled for their verdict ra) say they find the defendant -uilty. It ig ordered and ny tw 2 > he defendant be confined to a a S o @ nN ct oO Ww, + 4 “ a+ VA . av t ey find the defendant cuilty . bie ° ‘ . — a 5 the common jail of lredell County for the term 04 6 + lonths and is assigned to work on the public roads of Said county during the term of his imprisonment. during the term of his imprisonment. Ge C. MW, Plea fuilty. Judgment suspended Payment of the cost of this action » Parks, L. S. Sherrill J. R. Johns on, amphbell being sowrn and empaneiled f¢ Tt A verdict of suilty having heretofore this case it is ordered by the urt that the defendants pay a fire of ©10 each and each pay one The following jury: Kellar, P. A. Shinn, 7. Me. Kellar, , . and . their verdict say is ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined to the common jail of Iredell County for the term of le months and is assigned to work on the public roads of Iredell County upin the m Larcency. Plea guilty. Judgment suspended. VS. jgcar Jackson 7 “oust arcency. Plea not guilty. The follewinr jury: " i } . : ee ouston. al % 0 follewin gury: Affray. Plea not guilty. the follo Vinge jury: qufus Kyles. } in, J. Bb. SRepnerd, J. Ay Raymer. M. ¥ : , : : “ onde - oodin, ] ’ a. g the ihe A. M. Gabriel, F. M. Abernathy, las ROCA, 2s AL Shinn . : " rT * te T " " it rricon . J. Morrisen, J. M. Arey, ™ C. Joehna : R I J Yea i oY on, ’ 7 ohnson, David Fox, S. LL. Temlin, R. L. Poston, Reaiiar, 0 ¢ i ry R 54 . Piz T,.. Yauch ws tf. T: orecht 7 . st ‘ P 5 j e e ol anson, i aupn, + Alas TECHN, uv. ‘ Owens, Park: ; v S. Sherrill, a = Johnso! ; v. A, Camp) ell and C. ‘. Hucspeth being sworn and empanelled for their . . oe ! =e oe mi tied for their being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find verdict say they find the defendant gulty. It is the defendant guilty of A. , TD. . and Kyle: uilty of J rdered by the Court that th jant > in ordered by ourt that the defendant be confined to Sixple Assault. f the cowson jail of Iredell County for the term of 4 yt a | ' } papi yy months and °s assigned to work on the public roads ef 133 i * . air a als i saic county during the term of his imprisonment. a ; 1 vG@e iW 4 | rillett ‘chain. Retailing. The defendant throveh his counsel comes vite and not admittins o open Court, VS. oncelains stolen coods. Nao Bev e @ ‘ , : i : ; protesting his innocence, says that he 1s unable to contend ee iAy if Hlvira ‘ouston 7" ‘ iA ts ; i l further wit? the State, and, therefore, with the consent of the Solicitor and the leav: of the Court enters a plea rae of nolo contendre. the judrment of the Court is “tate ‘ . , suspended upon tre payment of the cost of this action. tollwing jury: 0, il no The @ : h. M. Gabriel, F. %. Abernathy, ”, I Kellar, P. A. Sail te David Fox, S 1.. Tomlin, %. I. Poston, J. M. Kelley, ¥” Ve, - ; , + 2 Vampobell arr "ke C “herr Tohnson anda . A, vamp en SOrton ‘ : . : ; ‘ 1 sa AS, . . le] riad, « Ke JONNBON, @ \eco-onized in the sum of $50.00 to appear at hov ierm , , sas y find 2 j eworn and ermpar r t) rdict say they O ‘ F ’ ; sworn and emparelled for their ve 1911 and show good behavior, and show that he has ree . . . > . . ; ‘ 1T pryaer ne defendant psuilty. Prayer for Judemen imbursed J. 1. Goodman of $45.17 th amount of fine una nd £ aeccne aaah hs on ee noes a+ f thi case, a ' : : continued Upon the payment of the cose 0 cost advanced by Goodman for him in this cause. ‘ . . . 1 P a< gi bond it 1S orderec by the court that the defendant give — \ + he May Term 0 ve Ge in the sum of “100 for his appaarance at the May ter " ‘ bos ‘ ; 3 : pbehavicr: Court and show that he has been of good bene Larcency, Praver for judgment. wrayer con't upon the Payment of the cost of. this action. Defendant recovinized is = - oO J 4 oe te in the sum of 425. for his appearance at Nov. Term 1911 yourt and show that he has paid the cost and been of “ood behavior, “Sonora le Coy ~ ; Curt now takes ar adjournment until 9 AM. Friday Vay 26, 1911. -~ ~ a ad A a OO —- <4 t oraered appe Lee “artin. Falce Pretens (! in on affidavit. se. ontinued as up ; Judge Presiding. ‘ yr his e bond +4) the sum of #100 fo h is court/ FRIDAY MAY a6, 2¥eas This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9 A, M 0 97 0 65 crate State V8. ‘a WW De Wea Fine heretofore imposed is hereby Vis vill Alley. . 5 reduced to “<b. Oscar Jacksor Rufus Kyles. As + De Y, A verdict of simple assault having here tofore been rendered, it is ordered by the Court that , lL . ‘ : o tate Jackson pay a fine of *10 and one half the cost, and oe 1 : vs. judgment is suspended as to Kyles upon the payment of is ‘ ee my ane : Sim Horders. ranbling. lea not fuilty. The follewins jury: one half the cost. A. Mi. Babriei, F. —Ruernatay, (. Le Keller, Ps A. SRinn, ry David Fex, S. L. Tomlin, <. L. Poston, J. 7’. ‘ellar, Cc. C. Parks, LS. Sherrill, J. R. Jonnsen and . A. ‘) ‘anpeell bein; sworn and empanelied for their verdict say they find the defendant not guilty. ‘nest Rell. Mas We Be S.. lea not feuilty. The following jury; ’ + J. L. Shepherd, J. A. laymer, J. ™, Vickery, Robinson, D. R. Barnhardt, J. L. : vate — Lamprecht, J. °. Owens, ©. A, Hudspeth and Vs. ‘, Campbell beine sowrn and empaneiled for their verdict a &. Ossie Hooser. Retailing. Nol Pros. ault. — at r a be r- ~ ct rr hey n e defendant fpuilty of simple lt is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay a fire the cost ot this case. TT Larcency. Plea not ruilty. The following jury: oy \, '. Gabriel, F. M. Abernathy, ”. L Kellar, P. A. Shinn, n 4 David Fox, S. IL. Tomlin, R. TZ Poston, J. M. Keliar, ©. W 2 3 bam ie ‘ wii 7 a et% SSGCKVEN. As We D. Not a true bili/ Defendant discharged. ; Parks, L. S. Sherrill, Z.J. %. Johnson and", A. Camp! ell being sowrn and empanelled for their verdict say they ‘lind the defendant guilty. . It is ordered by the Court hat the defendant be confined to the common nail of VE Jim Gillespi 1 GC. C. W. .Plea not guilty. The following jury Iredell County for the term of 6 months and -s asdgned vamorlide; ple, ali & ‘ om inl v _ . ‘ r — im Yadd 11 A . Goodin, J. Il. Sheph_ rd, J. A. Raymer, J. ¥. Vickery, to work on the public roads of Iredell County during Tohnso? 7 t ’ ce 1) Re s-ordat J, De the term of kis iz c ¢ YONNSON, Z. HK. HKobir son, i >, Barn ardav, -» i ° nis mprisonmen . au Mily ds ss Lamprecht, a A . Owens, ae Hudspeth, 10. 68 “aS : , ir : and . A, Campbell being sowrn and empane/lled for the a “ate Verdict say they fird the defendant cuiliy. 1% *° ra “6 Taay 1 ' . . : | 1e ordered by vhe Court that he pay a fine of #10 and th cost of this case. A. '. D. ™. The forfeiture hexvetofore ordered in this Case is herebyordered stricken out UrdocK. .etalliineg. he following jury, A. Goodin, i. Shepherd, J. 4, Raymer, J. , Vickery, '. JOhnson un ; binson, D. R. Barnhardt, J. L. Wau-h. J 4-9 Ue Lanprecht, J. A. Owens, C. A, iiudspeth and Campbel] 2in- sowrn and empanelled tor their verdict say they find the defendant not -uilty. ezzelment. Term 1910. cefendant ple ads not felony +s charged bill of indictment oreciable tress spended upon Slander. The following jury:A. °:. Gabriel Abernathy, "". L. Kellar, P. A. Shinn, David Fox, 4OMmL2} , se Poston, sl Kellar, ( i‘ Parks, heing sowrn Sherrill, J. R. Johns ind Campbell an si + ndan' and empanelled for their verdict say they fina the defe y a ‘ . ‘ , jef endat uilty. It is ordered by tne Court that the defen r the the coumon jila of Iredell County fe public term ot lg month: and is assinged to work on the e a ne raods of Iredell County during the term of 428 impris¢ nen. Dighman Illicit Distilling. Coninued for bill. Ordered ‘onroe DA6smar's that he give bond in the appearance at the 'ext term of this arvey Dishman. Illicit Distillins:. tinued for bill. Ordereca that wae J the defendant cive bond in the sum of °100 for his aplias appearance at the nex 1 of this Court. to issue in ten days if bond not given. im tillespie. i 1¢ Lilt he foilo Wi ardt, C. A. Hudspet amprecht, and °. A. Campbell being s mpanelled for their verdict say they fird the defendant cuilty. ordered by the Court that tne defendant pay a fire of 10 and tre cost Larcency. A verdict of puilty having heretoiore rendered in thys cas¢, it is iered by the the defendant be confined t he cownon jail of Irecell is assicned to work County for ther term of months and the term of On the blic roads of Iredell County durine ris imprisonment. See ee Za - i addins spe tee ome ik 3 “Se TE ce 7 oe e May 29th, 1911. le Court meats according to adjournnent at 10 . wat 4¢ a SE f (atiine, I a nol he tollowing jury: ”. Deaton, “igh Sheriff of Iredell County, returned into open roodin, L hep} J aymer eT cs t} wins seod an awful men % as jurors { ? J 9 . Vi Kery, eee h names of Las follo V1 00a da - aW al ) or or L “ar 9 7 os ae ¢ so yr? -. t: a4 " : / / LG > : rree ‘ } rn: ardt, tna Second Week of this term, toewl reeland, v 9, Jillespie, "ildy ‘Yelburn and empanelied - 1. A. Ostwalt, LUtihy fendant not ‘arrison, John A. clean, " Naeh r. Casn, followine were excused o” accou The tollowing LOGI. e como: wath leave to the County Commissioners out during the term of his imprisonment. neir verdict en as follows: following jury: . ve 10 t18 plaintiff intern »< LNVErMalrl. as syorn and emparelled Yes. the defendant not cuilty. a a. Did tre defendant bi ie t Pendant commit adultery “A "8 complaint? ‘nswer: - Lowe The following jury; J. Freeland, \illespie, “ildy Welborne, Press Irdered A. F. Lewis, R Brown, T. *. Ostwalt, 7. of 1O a , Campbell and ‘7. J. ctimpson veing sowrn panelled for their verdict say they find tne issues submitted to them as follows: Judrment absolute. hat Le iat te » if any, is the defendant indebted to tne plaintiff? amount fable Court adjournes MAGILL 10 A, i a) anenrer “a9 and mETeZent ae Gates a : Jude Presiding. MUMSDAY MAY 39, 2941. Dr. Albert ‘:ouck fi ae This Honorable Cou;t meets according to adjournment at 9: 30 *. Mm Th Y ow ee Se = Alice Honeycutt. fue Tesaeving guryy vs Ma aa Re. Cy Little, L. k i °o a Preeland, I. ©. Gilaecpie, VYiiey Well orne, _———— D, A. Ingle te A. Fe BOWis, Bae BPewn, Ts A Oacwait, Tf. §, TLoftin, vs. ' C. m Campbell and‘. J. Stimpson beinse sworn and en. Jt, A. Alexander. Trial continued over from yesterday. The jury ~ ve a ae panelled for their verdict say they find the issues heretofore sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they ' ’ i bi enhnitted to them as follows: find the issues submitted to them as follows: | | | | In what amount, if ary, is the defendant indebted to the plaintigg- First. i | Answer; “10, Is the note sued on the property of DP. A. Ingle as alleged in the complaint? Tet Answer: Alley as ailevrced in Continued. witnesses allowed ‘@esville Lumber Co © ’ ' Saws o » vavin .. fe Ys i Judge Presiding. A ¥@ Cloanin t ’ Continued and the Clerk is ordered to give notice to tne Parties to file pleadinzs by next term of this Court or “ne action will be dismissed. © sentence heretofore imposed in this case is hereby changed and it is ordered that he be confined to the comnon jail of Iredell Couy for t+} a t ; “6 . 44 : + + ‘ S b © term of 12 months with privilege to t e County Commissioner to hire him out during the term of his imprisonment, 262 P wi No. 62 wednesday May 31, 1911. , ; ; ae Cou meets according to adjournment at 9:30 A. M. oe. _ Overcash This Honora le Court meets J a3 2 Be edb ty 7 wel Wy | 4 { H : roe NO. ! , ¥ » . : ver +r “i fe -4 mr. 2 i cra ary Overcash. fhe follewing jury, ‘ « Fowler, J. A. ‘lunday, N,v, uy, G. Ferrill, Adm . a | if f Garrison, J. A, Alexander, *, }. harris, Cowan Alexander vs. it { . ’ id ~¢ i » Oats, A. . Savielle, Rk. Ss. Loore, ; Cash. ¥ 7 Southern Power Company wets > L rilbert and i. G. Sloan being sowrn and empnelled for Dixie Cotton Mills The following jury, l. » Garrigen, J. Ls Re Cs Bigeie;, fi. Ps Gidleepie, be as LO Unen .W ne ” ora r ae 7 their verdict say they find the issues sunitted rr 8 ae error John A. MeTea: i. 4. Cas! . BR. Campbell . 8 as follows: John A. Mel.ean,, Cash, Campbell, First: Loftin, ‘ . Brown,, Press Bruce and L. HK. Freeland being ) iv } orn and empanelled for their verdict say they . Trial | Did plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? ee ee ‘ r : : ™ ahs : Pe | biti | Answer: Yes. continued over until tomorrow. | i ‘ uit i Second. Io. £0 vane 4 4 as the plaintiff been a resident £ h c # - eh is ‘he Frick Co s tne plaintiff been a resident of the State for two years prior to the if comnencement of this action? Continued. Third: Did the defendant covitt adultery with Jake Urey and John Owens as re | allezsed in the conplaint? Referred. i} 1nlS onorable Court takes an adjournemtn ontinued. 2 and Walrer ; pases falker, Con't. Time allowed defendaits to file answer. Time allowed parties to file pleadings. Time allowed parties to file pleadings. vs. Clifford Cloaninger. Larcency. Defendant comes into court, bein ai , w & pre- sented by counsel, and Waives bill and »laed; not guilty 9 > f the char;ve of larcency as set forth in the warrant, but ? guilty of foreciable tresspass. It 1s ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined to the comnon gail of Iredell County for the term of 6 months and is assigned to on the public roads of said county during the tern of his imprisonment. Judgement suspended. the Court that this action be disnissed at tne plaintiff. jury: J. % Lipe, Llespie, "ildy welboren, Press - Brewn, T. Ostwalt, 7 . Loftin and bell being sowrn and emapnelled for their verdict the issues submitted to them as follows: and the defendant marry as allerd? Answer: tae plaintiff been a siden ‘ the “tate for two years before whe complai t? SWeT es. + . . ate F F . j 7 vhe defendant committ adultery as alleced in the complaint Answer: Ye s 8s. The following jury: J. ~, Lipe, Littie,: L..e Freeland, T. ». Gillespie, "ildy “‘elbore, Press “ruce, ” Cash, A. }. Lewis, Rk. M., Brown, 7. A. Ostwalt, Toftin and ©. . Campbell being sworn and empaneleed for their verdict say they find the follows: Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as all;ed? Answer: Yes. Has the plaintiff been a resident of tne tate preceding the filins of this complaint? Answer; Yes. Did the defendant ‘abandon plaintiff and refuse as allered? Answer: ™ WV mt J T qa this Honorable Court takes an Thursday June l, 1911. THURSDAY JUNK 1, 1911. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:50 A. ¥ iti ee el ei i 2 ve a | @ ry ry ~ - oa > 2 = 4 z < = : i] bd < far ne m oO = . Fe Mh | Ba ‘ ‘ “pe F “a7 a ! 7.4% @ b . : Dixie Cott Mills ny (10 The following jury: J. » Tipe, |. » Littvie, J. F Dixie Cotton ! co, Ry. CO» . Freeland, . P. Gillespie, Wildy Welboren, Press Bruce, o. Power Co. he jury heretofore sworn and empanelled for their iN 4 Lewis, Rk. < RrOWwn, Ts A, OBCWALT, £. s BOT GIN, Hj + i /—_ Pee Se EMEA AE : verdict say they find the issues submitted to them ag i qi: ‘ww Campbell and ‘7. J. Stimpson being sworn and Fe } ' . | follows: i | : : ¥ | | eaannelled for their verdict say they find the issues i | | | e'lay First: ; iP Lae aar’ eat Ge as submitted to them as follows: [aur fas the intestate of the plaintiff killed by the neglirence of the eget 4 4 t TS 4 ~*e { FAaree. | | Dixie Cotton Mill, as allesed in the Complaint? : . qt < , an Ma ean 41) Wer the er li rence of the } | Ans v 2 Wasathe plaintif ] S ule and a; on ela ured a sk ‘ ae Vv u j allered ix the complaint? i} ee ij hae * 4 Answer: Yes. 1 as the plaintiff cuilty of contributory neglirence as allered in the | , } Yas the mule and wazon injured Wnet denen. 40 pas ; : plaintiff's driver, as alleged in the answer? cae nat damage, if any, is tre plaintiftr entitled to recover? ti oy ee That damare, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? oles ee c » a. « a ales eeptin A wibiters oe “Onorable court consent. FRIDAY JUNE é, L9ak. ve Bo This Honorable court meets according to adjournment at 9:30 A, \, “6 oyog Ridson i vs. £6 ‘ : vT . ; D ’ : : . Nae ee | Bidson The following jury; J. Y. Lipe, R. C. Little, L. 7. Freeland, nell & >, Watt T, P. Gillespie, Wildy Welborene, Pres: Bruce, !. ™, Cash, Vs, A.. F. Lewie, &. M. Brewn, T. A,Ostwalt, T. § Leftin and | ; ae “> Vaunt Yant+4 ‘ > ; iY, BL i Feunt. ontinued. c. 7, Campbell beins sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the issues submitted to them as fellews: Were the plaintiff and the defendmt inter-married as alleged in the i +. a Vs “awley and ‘7. W. Foushee complaint? <peveieeunaimei Answer: Yes. ti4 A. D. Uaness. 50 days allowed defendant to file answer. | i 2 ri end. Did the defendant zhandon the plaintiff and commit adultery as alleged mt complaint? Answer: Yes as. The forfiture of *4q/ neretofore entered arainst Dr. ii rd. Yas the plaintiff bean a resident of the State of orth ‘arolina for Kd. ©. Kine, who was a State's witness in this case, is ore than two years next preceeding the commencenent of this action as alleged complaint? Answer: van. The followinz jur’; J. v. Line, R. C. Little, T. 1m, Freelant, i i D 4 : ‘ . ’w nash + Perr ll, Admr. wy f - P. Gillespie, “ildy Welhorne, Press @ruce, ., %- [&8%; i A. F. Lewis, R. if. Brown, T. A. Ostwa:t, fT. 5. Loftin and Dixie Cotton Mills C. ™ Campbell beins sworn and empanelled for their verdict So. Power Co, Motion hy the defendaht to set aside verdict. otion denied. + w find 6) . i mas f s: Defer vay they find the issues subnitted to them as follow “Wendant excepts, Defendant moves for a new trial. Metion over-ruled. i ¢ the “andan } ah +ea re | as on : im Yt s unt? Yefanda i's the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, if so, in what amou ‘ndant excepts, Judgment in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record swer: $40.00, less #5.40=2 $34.20 “Which the defen dant egcepts and appeals to the Sups aye Count. Netice of appeal as Mt. Waived , . Vat , "#4 in open court, “—— at *50/o00. lx days allowed defendant to “*rV@ case on appeal, and (4) days thereafter allewed defendant to file counter case * exceptions, BoA si a 5 . i : - reelané, » @lland. The followins jury; J. w Lipe, R. “. Little, L. BF se “ ad : s 1 ‘ be Cash, +. P. Gillespie, “ildy "elborne, Press "ruc@, ~+ * ; - in and A. F. Lewis, R. i’. Brown, T. A. Ostwalt, T. S- ae ve eridet C. ‘7, Campbell being sowrn and empanelled for eee say they find the issues submitted to them as fo Is the defendant indevted to the plaintiff, if so, in what amount? and 60 a KO wt ve ~gtesville O4 1 and Fertilizer Company vs. eh J. +. Davidson ‘ nae apP ita! I, Roseman ry consent a jury is with li ® _—* r on “3 e oO a. T +3 o oO rawn and a mi 2 ond 60 are consolidated and ¢. » Auptir is made a party, plaintiff. “outhern Railway Compa y. otion by plaintiff to set aside verdict, otion e is referred to Dorman Vhompson, Nsy ne to hear the evidenc t} . q : + the cas ,¢ 27 2 3 ) oth i ai sve * . ‘ 2 ) S 7] ok . ie be Plaintiff excepts. Judgment in faver of the > 1 ; : n . denied laintiff excepts defendant as set out term of this Court. ) in the records to which the plaintayt excepts and appeals to the Cupreme Court ; ! 6 ’ Appeal bend fixed at $25.00. bo days allewed plaintiff to serve case on appeal |v and bo days thereafter allowed de:endant to file exceptions or counter-case. nett. The sentenced heretofore pronounced in thi: case is hereby rderead i » | this Honorable court takes an adjournment till 9:50 A. M. Saturday June 3, 1911, reduced to six months. : ~~ / 4 ' : C ( SP me 4 a7 ok. Se ee ee et ee ee ne ee emeheenell ~ Judge Presiding: sentenced heretofore e::tered in this case 1s hereby reaucea to “hern Railway Company. The following jury; J. W. Lipe, R. Cc. Little, L. s. Freeland, *COnd, & : : } } as the Plaintiff euilty of contributory » gl.gence at alleged in the 4 Answer: “Alrq, win. ant nor : : ‘ > ; . da lage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: “300.90 orth Carolina, In the Superior Court [Iredell County. Vay Term 191) In the Superior Court. Carolina, T , Mov Terr ¢ . Kirlena pr May Term 1911. tredell Comey dia Kirkmar sarane Cotton Se ed Oil Mills, Onc, iY aus use COmMayr On tC @ eard at thi a 7 +. : 7 Tr. - s S i e2 oI . a Vs. : Te SS OMPORSOF Cour | . ne en ey eee ae es pe 15 conor, vuare «. - Lyon, Judge Presiding, and it avpearin om cojthern Radlway Company, \ Ypeardy that the Ques at id Lona PphadrvlIL cvanert &@ voluntary none wpuit. Li es Lasneaw This cauce coming on to De heard at this term of the Court ana 1% i { v,1iS, therefore, onsidered anc ’ ‘ { ah 1a" Q >( at sai : ; oe ger ‘ ‘ i ees : ‘ 5 — hy a ¢ +) Yo <3 t) 1c > were founc \ fny ~4 + ts buliue | ' ; , oe 3 ENG SHS Same 245 Nereoy Gismissed and that the piaj sppearing that an tne trial of the cause, th issues were Tound in iavor of the i ¥ r4ad.vt! , ib} rar a as -) + wanYr , Y Asin ; bt defendatt, whereupon t plaintiff appealed to the Supreme sOurt, and vine Tailed i i efen : 1g Sr Sa a Ta a i al ee eel =e pee aa baby no n > : ° ive th appead Nona case 4 equll ea J tat vu v@, sala A ic ,OUTL GQLSEMLSEi60 vine j | claintiff's appeal. is f ‘efore, considered and adjudged by the Court, ther the plainti recover rothine in this tranasa tion and that the Southern Rallwey C mpany, recover havins answered tLe considered and ute: , +h vA ses ania y 44 8 Of vlidé sOUTG, 26 IB, tnereiore, Southern Railway Company, OTTARS and the cost of this action to be taxed Judre. this AUS ; mj e ‘ re 4 4 i Cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court beiore me ¥U ic av s “4, 0.0 Lyon © . JON ® (re we ‘ . 4 . re ; i sa re re oe esicing, and 1 appearing bo Lhe ourt that tne mavter a soue have : been compromised and setiled between the parties by a reement tnar * Plaintigg ; aft shal] rec * £ +3 41 . es 5 i inteanen th sreon over of th. defendat the sum of $65.00 and interest thelecus fr 470m the th “ bs : , tains 10th day of sept 1910. lt is, therefore, considered and adjudged the Plain; oe ne , } ia 7 ‘ } y y aeorg f recover the said sum Logethwer with leagl interest theron 2! TMance ws “ith ec i as the terms f the compromise together with the coat of this action s © taxed by the Clerk Cs Ge DBYGNs Judge Presiding. 13 J jary Ter | / > nelusions of law to the next termcf this Court ‘ C2 ya LLY findings of fact and co . wa Te e 4 grney B. Raper Atty for Defendant. se —_ e 7. a en a Adelia Harris { JUDGMENT? « p.grier and w.D. Turner | "attorneys for Plaintiff. -Vs- ‘ +" ° Imin4 Yate P ‘ ye ] ; ( N.P. Watt,Administrator of | vorth Carolin { Superia Court . + . ¢ gg yy 9 Alex 7821 Une § Iredell Coun y t May Term, LV ve W.H. B. Overcash e Vie This cause @ning on to be heard, and it appearinr to the Court | Mary Overcash. | that all parties interested have adjusted the differences andagree setlLiement of saia cause, that N.P. Watt, Admire [at an 4 na . . . * 2 5 aii e . ‘ , } Cynarit ” istrav@ of Alex Gaither, is sot to collect eny re ts, or demand any This cause cormi: on to be neard at this ter f the Superior Court Claim acainst Adelia Harris, pjaintiff, accruing prior to January Wth, of Iredell County before His Honor C.C. Lyon,Judge presiaing and the fol- ; r iJl1, and said Vett administrator is to pay the said Adelia larris ,the lowing issues having »een submitted and answered by the Jury. w vo Hundred ($200.00) doliars in cash. Firste- Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as aile:-ed re > +3 > an 5 ae ; . t} Carn © » +9 re, considered and adjudged upon the arreement the Complaint? ’ i . Cn) fay ‘ sr? 4 ¥ “i a. —~ tes ; d ~ + ) nNoweLfr e = Ss ; Of LOUNSCL, a: ered eiow iraicated that theplaintiff recover of the Answel 16s. re ~ oe Uundred ($200.00) Dollars and Second. | the laintiff tem a resident of the State for two years pric Pi helow ire my y : : 5 1" pe T, > a-ainst Third. Did tie defendant conmmuit adultery with Jake Urey and J ule w- recover not} yi ps | Ad Harris for any claim@ de: i of any kind prior to the 30th day of Owens as allered ir the Complaint? Answer : Yes. ‘ ' - a . . . x. ‘ . fy + ye 4 OY yyy C.C. Lyon, It is therefore considered and adjudced that the bonds of «atrimon, emi ne .) eae istrict. existing a oe gi / - ; hereby ge Judce Riding Tenth Judicial Dist: ing between the plaintitf and defendant be and the same are hereby Qi be this actinn to h.C. Caidwell It is furt er ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost c Counsel for Plaintiff. + Dewey * lc? : ® taxed by the Clerk, c.C. Lyon »Jud e. Counsel for Defendant Ve D) suUry er, ‘ . 1 are ' 7 : | Ee Statesville,N.C. May 25,1911. Q helrseate law, *1@ Grand Jury tor the May term of Iredell County Superior Court Sr leave to t In the Superior Court Submut the falowing report: Nort} Car 1Y ~ We app in ‘ . ‘ ‘ + y 1 \ ‘ inmates ortn Carolina } May Term,1911. appointed a committee to visit the County Home who found 20 inmates ( ‘ 48 White ons 2 Tred ll /Ounty § ‘te and 8 cOlored) three of whom are blind and one insane ana we re- { . COmme n 7 ; i ¢ id that the lunatic be sent to the insane asylum, also another who 2: Confir . Lehn ned in the County Jail. We find that the Home is kept in as ood condition —4 me -VS- ir i — RICE ‘ ORDER OF REVEL - 88 Ppoges} . Luck : PoaBible under the circumstances but it is dilapidated and unsanitary, 1UCK Construction Co npany. it and We re by COrnme? d th more suitable referred This c at the resent property be disposed of, ana a ove Cause comin on to be heard by consent, the cause is locatian near the county seat. - & Secured to Dorma g incon m bios ab ‘ Thompson,Esq., who is to hear and determine all matter We al; an : s o wh the troversy in thi and ° appointed a committee to visit the chain gang who found ~~ ; . t S action both the law and facts ,and make his repor camp in good condition ,and the prisoners report that they are well feq 13 prisoners ( 5 white and 8 colored) and we consider that the amount of work In the Superior Court North Carolina which is béne done is very creditable in view of the small force employed { May Term, 1911 i ea re jredell County : . ye il are not taken care ,; i We find however that the roads built by the chain rane = a i by the road overseers and the roads are allowed to wash out and cave in at th j i" : } s ne j repair force ary ish We als , { beak on ! to c or 2 oli hed. We also find that This cause a ain coming on to be heard ana 1v ay } earin LNAaAU 3 roa | n Rucene Morrison | HA Be | iW ; | sides, and unless something is done to take care of them a larre part of the " 1, +4 i i ia amount i for these roads will be wasted We therefore r o | i re | ff amount exppnded for these roads wi sted. her r ecommend that the ; mee { D2cRER CONFINING CALE. LA a | "o WA, Mayhew and wife a = overseers be required to repair the macadam roads at once, and keep them In good } } i | | AV | ( WR. Mayhew ; Mee if condition until the new road law goes into effect, after which time we recomnend 2 f ha yi “~ + v > aia a et i _ thie eneral condition of the pbli oads are bad, an Emme Y ba ; ‘ ‘ i ; ‘ ei (i “re ; philic roads are bad, ana we recommend that Overseers ve my on, Commissioner, appol: ted by the Court to sell the lands de scrited | dhhy nice O27 te i “¢ * We Thomp¢ required to keep their oy ade ++ } 34 5 : | ‘oads in better condition until the new system beco ; 7orem Vets in the comolaint,did, ° “* @ tn Q. Qa, ’ °o A > "Ss "3 re <0 -~ os S a oe r es PE ae operative. aaa bie sale ae ree ge ‘ ie . : whi) n1@A@ rere O ls Ca \ t ais ANG AO Tiss 1 Ler } auction, at which :ale Bugene Morriso: ecame tne J ¢ ue if We have received 8&5 Bills of Indictment ,and have found 64 True Bills py . Ss eshient to a vricr ai mere ills, at the sum of $2,500.00, said lands being sole subject to a prio: \ We visited the county jail in a body and the prisoners report that they are Sie EN A AEG TE " mertcace of $400.00 and interest, and it appearing to the Court that t ai vermin. This report is confirmed by sale was in all recpects duly and properly conducted and made, that no ~ bi ahh PRA i | \\ " the officers in charye but we do not consider them to blare for this condition tia lica : ; | i ee POSE ee gear eee . crease bid is just and reasonalle, \] i: 7 i i ‘i t J 4 49 ’ e ° : 1 +) as une C44 USB LGY I ve asKeed tnat Vé su ae ro. > for t) rison : : ) ae 44 le i fs C b Jaa £ 4its e rovided for the prisoners It is there’ e ordered, adjud -ed and decreed e £231 le | i if ; Y | ; ib! eces: Pr —— 4 4 is se nviees eoak pele ‘ : cere ‘WY +) morn nti euein hs . ’ } ; ? | 1 a Yy ANG Vecy ner request pas not been frarted. e thereforeurgently be ad the sare is hereby in all respects confirmed, and that the saia | A {| . ‘ | tong ; ‘he yk TY { ected, and that when prisoners are 0X Dornen Thompson, Commissioner as aforesaid, is hereby ordered and directed 1 i ; ; j Wied ' ¢ ! tre @ eex: 1) ec ; , #oll7 nfartea wit} 3 liseas hat : £ } Wi ® & G 32 1¢ mn 2) fected with vermin or disease tha to execute and deliver to the sad Rucey e Morriso? and is elir: and ass i es « ci€an sulceg e@ furnished at the exvense of } rPOUrty IIn se som@éhine is done : ; cx } Se Of the county. Unless s¢ n g a deed in fee si? le for the gid ls nds 213) ject to said prior martr re ( 7 Wwe Tear that the court house is likely to be infected with vermin broucht in bj ~ iid $400.00 and interest, and the clerk of this Court shall plece a credit of ae i | &5 . ; i, _<s mie Te oi es , *4 we t %<,900.00 on the d ment heretogore rendered in this action a&S Or tne ids fo ae Ve find that the vauricus officers in the court house are in ood condition day of this term of court. su mitted, ny T a s Clare, Foreman. Web VAs 1:8 In the Superior Court. ve Before the Clerk. “+ VVuUlYL aid that at ¢ @ ~ = + + er c+ n t 3 n ,Dorman Thompson, Att to hin t) “4 ei — ne ath + sn . : ot a4 ar we *) oat} nate cree } Cath to support the Constitution of North Carolina, the oat a3 the Coneti+,.+4 re Mstitution of the United States ,and the oath of an attorney: It is 5 “ : > ‘ - 8 ry . : . , ef y sai In this action the plaintiff Bessie Mchelland by and t rough her at therefore considered and ordered by the Court tl at the said ' aG psad? tI Bessie NcLes lay DY i . ae “0hnn G , * { vy 7 -* weWie } hind & : , ‘ : » prac of the vorney Harry P, Grier comes into Court and takes a non-suit in the above *8 be admitted, and he is hereby admitted to the practice of a entitled action, law in all the Courts of the State of North Carolina. : game It is » : . ‘ 1 edincs It is therefore considered and adjudyed that said action pe and the ‘ ordered by the Court further that a record of the Proceedinge ‘ *8ken herein be is hereby non suited. Spread upon the minutes of this Court. J.A. Hartness. a dees, Clerk Supericr Court Correct. Judce Presiding. PP, Grier Attorney for Plaintifr. Superior --Court ei 07° ae Ser anne specific lien on irtue of attachinent proce:d y.C. bY yirtue of %41 , ‘ . . * ‘ aya re ; : Suid : ' rg ro ; sheriff, as ayy a > 1 ORDER. in Mooresville on | Street ,adjoining nrady, lying between Southern Railway DAG) ) v F : , ‘ 5 a, s, ¢ » vlace; gaid lie 0 ear dat? affidavit filed by tne plaintif é ue notic North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County May Term,lvil. e nd adjudge heard at ron,Juds-e and a jury utler Roller Mills, for naval und tat the defendant committec ; ‘ rn ry and the 9 “ 7+ 5 . 4 4 ‘ of said land and prope. oo hae) i Lé Hn :sident of Vas Ey ig ie , ie : ¥ : — oe n , reristered in Book «), ES iat as abe TL m Ridges Be reer de vn County aU le + it’s IABLNVIT I ne Superior Court Term, i911. ving ane” Tudael and others, iS Ou ms 4015 ca ' marior Court 18 Cause colding on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court 2 Ireq ell Count . 4 vOunty before wi pla 1s ehnenet 1, Lowe 2 5 “ty before his Honor C.C. Tyon,Judge Presiding and i+ appea that DeAe 4 “Ourt four ! F ns ) 4 ‘ : wy Pn ol ¢ Fifty - den). ai ee Cover ¢ he defendant §.S. Steele the sum 0 i "Clap ind 2 ) tay 22,1921 and 20/100 Dollars, with interest on fifty dollars from May 22,1 ordered and adjudj;e that ) ¥ ne defana. , ‘ , tnhawent defendants have paid the principle and interest of ed y 4) ¥OnN in t} , , : ‘ce . ; 4 liv sett yntee ai in the complaint in this action and that a friendly settlewe:t 7 Y@8n 10; + “ 1ade 1) ir . . 4 ¢ iw aker this court ®tween the parties thereto and the plaintiffs having taken 4 mom \ . . 7 lV Cc + af action to be taxed by the Clerk 0 nonsuj j intiff Suit it is therefore considered and adjudged that the piaintifts 8COvgr ; of the | . aoe ne ¢ aforesaid : defendants the costs of this action to be taxed py tne Clerk in Aren® considered and adjudsed that t1 ud;:ment CCOrdange wit) “1 the asreenent entered into by the said parties. O.C. Lyon,Judge Presiding: eS a a Peete North Carolina j Superior Court Term,1911 Judge and a Jury, and the Jury havin: answerd@ tne issue in favor of l uages i 24ee. ac set out in tne record, actions Nos. 61 and 6¢ having | ( tne plaintizt, @ : | | Iredeii County. { May + one acvioni.e ae ~ and ied a: ey 5 »een consolidated and triea a i EL i John H. Dalton } aes i ue oe It is therefore, considered and adjud: ed tnat RANTLE. ved i) Waa ie i ' AAO ’ Al bie { 4 V3 JUD Pour te 4 { ¥ {i 1} ‘" rT : +} 277" > 5 : { a al the ‘ae |? , wer of defendant G.M. Austin, tne sun of $54.20 and the costs rg eee tT; E. Dalton } Minish recover ol ‘an Vusle sie Ata 4 | \ ie j ‘ q £9 7 : : ee % D\ he Clerk. ; ae : of this action to be taxed by the Cler: | \ md @., » 4 " } c ne Superior Court bef ore His . : Presiding and it Sppearing that plaintiff faled ACULLON. : ie In Superior Court : aoe North Carolina \ in the Susy - , It is ,tuecefore, considered and adjudved that said action i | We r ey ‘ Iredell County { ay iSrim, A 21 the sane is hereby d&Smissed and that plaintiff pay cost of i i This cause coming on to be heard at this t erm of tn er 13] Worth Carolina ' In the Superdr Court of Iredell County before His Honor,C.C. Tyon,Judre Presiding, and a (ied . y having answered tne issue submitted to ve) uw Term, 2911. Jury , and the ju 4 1 It is ,therefore, considered and idjudsed by vue c ee nih & rAate ¢ plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of ten dollars and tne cosvs 0% 4 j tha 42 . . 2 + ! rena al Yaste Company. ( this action to be t axed by the Clerk of this Court. be c.c. Lyon, Judce Presidim. | ‘orth Carolina j { I In the Superior Court ‘redell County \ va: # eo : ‘ * ae + wrt an " 4 This cause coning on to be heard, at ti:is term of tne Court vay Term,}912 4 nite veer” 4 tne : T ie e being calial ror trial, ¥.J. Patterson f @ <r tv QO ee o , vit Cava t84e 1 ’ Da ai { Biore ALS cionor 4 ° Lyons,dudss { t44 + ‘ int) ff Was Ree ingeeiee \ tiff not being present, under order of the Court the plaint22! © Vs { JUDGIAKT. ' 4 ae + r : 5+ y pe none Ci. Un} \ called to come into Court and prosecute his action, or 4» would Ye #0idand +; av’ 1 acwey' te his Fe) suited, and tne plaintiff having faled to appear and prosecu aes His ; barr pe and ‘nis cause coming on to be heard at this time of tne Court His honor It is ordered and adjudged by the Court that tne plairt 2° Cc con oa over i%8 ‘+ Tyon,Judce Presiding, and being heard upon the isue supmitted to the none suited. It is furthe ordered, that the defeudant re Jury: F nt unt" we "Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, if so waht amount cost in its behal? expended and -o hence without day. answer § “$97.81 Thirty Seven and 81!100 Dollars. ‘ iff W.J. Patterson and 81/100 ‘s ,therefore ordered and adjudeed that the plaint C.c. Lyon, rec uv , 5 + Ce 2 cee ) “et of the defendant C.S. Helland the sum of ThirtyeSeven Judre Presiding. Dollars c > p> ok . 5 a h is ourt and cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this C M Term,1911. With | : : snteres on $37.81 Thirty Seven and 61/100 Dollars from this date -Vs- eri rt i { In tne Superior Cour ®* six per cent, Gli. Austin } r 0.c.1y0™ Cos MOR That action coming on to be heard before his Hone Judge. 4 In the Buperior Court vortn Carolina ' May Term,1911. i Norta Carolina f In the Superior Court tredell County Iredell County May Term,19 L1/ it . Ta Ne 7 Pros, A. Troutnan, Plaintiff. } > mares °Vs- eVSe 7 Dou. 7.Cc. Hill. Jas. W. Prown,Defenda:t. k 4 Lh ek! . , + y aqnr ) 7 yr Wig - Or r (* 9 Tue } ‘ This cause coming on to be heard before His HoOnor,C.C. Lyon, bh te ( ty : 1 i \ ya t . 1 | F ~ ; i -% . “ : m a a \ry gy ,¥ avvue@ari tv! = 4 3) f @ ye { "Ye ,? = This case com.ne on to be heard at this term of the Court, tudre Presidins, and yeing heard and it appearin, hat all maviters of co 1h if | { , ; + + ‘ + s : . 3 se a +4 4 of Yoirte baal } é and it appearin; to the Court tnat the smmons was duly issued on the th troversy havin een settled out of Court: : || ia em i an) wr af Tanuary raturnal to Tar nee Pian ' phe 8 re ¥ ordere adjudred that this action 1 lismissed » i i Gay otf January ,ivil, revurnas le to January Tex i; ef the Superior Court, it 1S, v: er sfore, ordered ,ad) Aa d Cc © di sea if | ill ~ ee r > , 4 + 4 ; ibid : ai ret ha taxe 4 ainst Cc ; ny 4 CieY x, ! } / | and i furtner apvpeuring tnat a verified Com: Laint was fiied on January and tne cost be vaxed @ ainsSwt wer e nade oy tne Clern | i ; | > : 1 ’ 2 ; ) - . . ' ry re x rOY | H : ' \ oist, 1914, and answer during said term was filed by the defendant. SP Se meee ee ly i® i v . Dy . - . % 7s . . . » > 7 . © cr ry 74 : 4 . v A j Cc L ea a ae . | ’ } | It is, tnersfore, considered and adjudred by the Court a es.id nt t thay tne vlaistiff recover of tne defendant the sum of Five Hundred ry TG Iredell County t ay Term,lyil. | Fl . “a aw n+ i Superior Court sarinz Sa accordance witn the decree of Complaint broucsht a fair } Yorth ¢ j sOMnNlssiloyr r ay - Yan 4 ‘4 . : ef Oner ins recomnended a confirmation of sal sale: that tne sale 7: = sy» Five Dollar’ card of sidered, ordered and adjud:ed aforesaid to (A ns ‘ ‘ - . Swear Graded Sch m a ve‘ Sannor for tne sum of One Hundred and Twen d School Trustees { v@ and the sane is hereby confirmed. And W.A. Drictol is hereby ae t rt agé! Bin os aA. Hannog the puter mene ’ @ucnorid ( il amunower . ized and empowered to execute-a Deed in fee to C.A. tor the land or lots sold aforesaid and described in the Complaint. this 4 “ ns eee ; / } st of “215 Caus Judre fas of sale to be first applied to payment of the co 4Se 4216 roc & Coming on to be heard before His Honor, CiGs yon, 4 gione Preg; ls Bh ommss iding, ‘ ; al ial heen sete ev of sale including ten dollars to W.A. Bristol, the © » and it appearing that all matters of controversy nave becn ‘led out of c id d an - -Ourt: and the balance to he creai+ ; ee 2 € lance to be credited on the judement heretofore render It is ; TT. d * therefore, ordered andadjudred that this action pe dismissed an the Cost taxed py the Clerk. C.c.Lyon ee hae C.C. Lyon,Judve Presiding: Judge. - : i - : i > cistine bet } he plaintiff and defendait r Nortn C irolina y In the Superior Court of matrimony heretofore existin; e veen t e plai Bid ATNLIQ aefe idant are Tn = Sounty Mat rn eae a. A Iredell County | ay Verm,1911, nereby dissolved ! C.C. Lyon,Judre. MB =e c : = . > 8 ct } H > a ~ ee asia tata i This June gnd,1911. eer. ae _ sm ae sere ten Superior Court Yo vs ' JUDGEEUT, yorth Carolina } sUperace VOUr —_ a ; Mrs. M.E. Westmoreland, { Iredell County { May Tera, lyll. | =< ee seo — 1 This cause coming on to beheard at this term of the Superior oo ipa iners a Se —a — shee 43 Court of Iredell County, before his Honor, C.C. Lyon,Jud;e Presiding, Chas. Byers f ea 4 vo lun i ti oe ae eel ne i i : a — <= Cy Q ; ’ . iy Fs: ard 10 apovarine to the Court that the parties in this action have com vs | promised and settled all matters at issue; Nancy Byers { It is ,therefore, considered and adjud-ed that the appeal of the defe-js: is tne sane is hereby dismissed and the plaintiff recover of the defendant all i; if This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His veC. Lyon,Judse Presiding. ct evidence in the case, and the jury having found that the defenda . plaintiff and refuses to Tortn Carolins | In the Superior Court It is adjud:-ed by the Court that the bonds ofmatrimony be dissolved redell County j May Term,1911l. v 5 Qn ai P r 13 .- 4, t worth varoiina an tne uperior vLourt Iredell County heard at this term of the Superior Court Honor, Cit. Lyo: ’ Jud a Presi dings UDOT bev ¥ the Judrmen ; , io nt heretofore This cause i ao sOnsidered and adjudred that the judgment siviver A coming o ‘ . rn = 2 4 es 2 ae : laa rmmed and adjudged vel. Lyon, Jude. » Jury. and the Turvy hai . und the issues submitted is action be and the same is hereby re-af‘irmed ane ad, wae wud-e, and Jury, and the Jury having found + th + > ee . \ fandant v0 Unem ar lat nut 40 #3 . : fawn ¢ +} »] Sigs nd avalnsy and adeciared to be final. And that the plaintiff recover of tie defenda and set out in the record in favor of the plaintiff and “ ct k tne enday the additional cost py the Clerk. defenda: ncurred in the said cause to be taxed It is, therefore, ordered and decreed by the Cou C.C. Iyon,Judse Presiding. Matrimony 3 , er " "ee seta vllony heretofore existing between the plaintiff anddefendant are or hereby q; Arty, Cay lan: . : 4 Ui Ton teh eee a f In the Superior Court i8solved, ms Tre his Jury on O74 iredell County ' May Ter: S June znd,1911. shomas Eidson ' C.c. Lyon,Judge. “Vie j av mem uu Tivala © Belle Ridson j , C. py His Hon.C- This cause coming on to be heard and being heard 4 ytte yon ~ ubm Lyon, Jude, and a Jury, and the jury having found all the isses ° to théin,y which are of ff and record in this casein favor of the plainti @calnst the defendant. ds ra a ne von It is, therefore, ordered anu decreed by the Court that ¢ owe ie ; é : 1 ¢ cisting between the plaintiff and defendant are North Curolina } In the Superior Court of matrimony heretofore 8x1is l t b I . inc f é ar Iredell County } May Term,1911, hereby dissolved. C.c. Lyon, Judre, aes LS een | This June gnd,1911. ~ 4... ssa we ia a a —— eneneemegenees } Superior Court < —— JUDGHEUT, vorth Carolina * . it aa May Term,1911. ar .* 7 Mrs. M.E. Westmoreland, { Iredeil County { =n Se = snes Te F ' this cause coming on to beheard at this term of the Superior By i | Court of Iredell County, before his honor, C.C. Lyon,Judre Presiding Chas. Dyers | rn i ng, and it appearing to the Court that the parties in this action have COM vs f JUDGMEN.. iI i | promised and settled all matters at issue: Naney Byers \ H ct ~ w ~ ct ies erefore, considered and adjud-ed that the appeal of the defers: =a the plaintiff recover of the defendant all rh : ‘ Mo. ' by dismissed and ' This cause coming on to be heard at this term of tne I 4 Pf * 7. Area ana + Ts war man the YroepPaAara”A ana +) e ' before His Honor,C.C. Lyon, Jude and @ wury Upon tne recora and t | | c.C. Lyon,Judve Presiding. : evidence in the case, and the jury having found that the defendat | sl aandoned the plaintiff and refuses to return and live with himas nis Wile. i ih In the Superior Cour . ‘. he bonds -imony 7 ssolved latrimony € adiss Tredeil County f May Term,1911. ea se i JUDGMENT uk J. Shiva e Anairt LOUrYL North Carolina j in the Superior Iredell County May Term,1911l. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court 4 + County ,before His Honor, C.c. Lyon, Judge Presiding, upon ™ Iredell note is ¢ ¢ . ‘ . . ~ aw - 7 ; +h ij ause i icate of the Supreme Court affirming the Judgment rendered in this. om DA. Inrle a : 1 ofor hi aie . 3 sna hetne heara vefore His Hon It is,therefore, considered and adjud:ed that the judgment heretofor This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before #2 + ydeed Cx. Lyon Judie. ar sc) ee eh ae Turvy havine found the issues submitted and adjuds Nywudie, and a Jury, and the Jury havin u the tendered in this action be and the same is hereby re-af!irmed @ : ndart to them a» 7 ; ' i : ‘ aaa sutiff and avainst and cecuared to be final. And that the plaintiff recover of the defenda" fem and set out in the record in favor of the plaintiff an . the the Clerk. “2e defendant: 0 e ¢ additional cost incurred in the said cause to be taxed by ; . : nas of It is, therefore, ordered and decreed by the Court that the bonds of ‘al * "4 sence Droceiding matr4 ae ; am eu C.C. Lyon,Judre Presiding. atrimony heretofor aintiff anddefendant are re e existing between the p tr h a 1ereby diss eel id a by dissolved. wOrta Carolina In the Superior Court d This Jur ‘ Ma ah May Tern Thomas Fids< n \ Se Lyon,Judge. “Vise } JUDGMENT. Belle Fidson j . Gi TH+ ia i : Ht Hon.C+4 nis cause coming on to be heard and being heard by His : tte+ Lyon, Jud-e i - ubm » and a Jury, and the jury having found all the isaes ® ff and +h ery ey oe es to them, which are of re cord in this casein favor of the plainti @cainst the defendant. ponds } the It is, therefore, ordered anu decreed by the Court that 290 eee a from the matrimonial relations with the defendant. That the ase a t ~~. I * a : tiff rele Worth Carolina { n the Superior Court sale page 88 cost of this action be taxed by the Clerk, | Sens paint. i : | Iredell County i fay Term,1911. . e.c . | .C. Lyon, i ) ie | I ; ' : ‘ i | : : ) Judrre Presiding. Ta . ; ’ Me ae | BT | MGMENT ini In the Superior Court Wea { | = ! ss vorth Carolina t \ | ig) i ‘ | ’ , rn *y 1 ‘. , Hi q ‘ May Term,1911. i W { | | Rosen unt } J : de l . (UG. ica f tredell Co y \ = oo net . oa ; . \ : : ° | uw Plaintiff and defendant having compromised their differenc : ee een: rene i é i fe ences in this aioe Wilhela,Administl avor Hi | Ni ae he action the plaintilf comes into court and taxes a voluntary nonesuit i Nd ; of urs. C. P, Wilhelm,Dec ased. 4 | {| ' It is adjudred that the defendant, U.I. Roseman, recover of Teorce “te action tobe taxed by the Clerk. i . 1%, Wilhebn. i ray - . CC uyoOn, Judjre Presiding. This cause coming on to ve hear ard and being heard before His Honor, i \ 4 ' . : : + artie ya “OM a } aw > a * . Drae ine a G apt ariane tnavl tne varvics ot hide F Borth Carolina } Superior Court .c,. Lyons Judge Pr siding, and it app * ; | : " hee. a ie a he 5llowi terme 4 es ; mised an t t} natters involved in this suit on the TossoOWin” Lermes, Iredell County { May Term,1911. mised and settled the matters : . , rn ee ’ ioe + —— - +o > hie action @y to surrenaer Up LY C= | The plaintiff to pay the costs of this action a id to su 1 f d ndan t to pay to and the defe a ismant 4 monument tO tne TwentyeFive Dollars in cash and to erect a monument oF Monuments 0 v : bY oe TIMAUT ie . i * " i ae pcs than One Ht st | oi Seer f the parents of plaintiff and defendant to costs not less tan wn ) Dollars. It is, therefore, considered and adjuded that this action and deliver up to defendar - * ge eee a \ ae ne 3 } A era the ionune yg lu ii i bay to plaintiff the sum of Twentyefive dollars, and erecy vi QO} tf ; "an j iS ns, to the memory of the parenvs of plaintiff comes into court and takes a non-suit. ory i uw c wv oO o U © @ Yover , ed , . .- than OF Hundred dollars. i b proper costs, which costs shall not be less than One Lunared ao », adjud:red that plaintiff be and it is nere 7 u o © Non «suited and that it pay the costs of this action. .- 7 “ Ves Lyon. fn une Caldwell, ‘vorney for plaintiff Admr. Tarth Nan we ¢ : —" yy sorta Carolina { In the Superior Court Harry P, Grier Attorney e (eee: ee ES Pina he vwwelGy 10r Def endan Iredell County { Sis Ter a, 1911. v el dant. Jay No th” 12 . or Carolina 4 In the Superior Court v caine Ir : . { JUDGMENT. Tedell County j May Termn,1911. Na “*he Inple “VS oes en PENETIT he £999 «2 Ji ee +. : re JUDGE ae This cause coming on to he heard at this term of the Court befo His Hon a v . + 34 j 5 their +S sonor, C.C. Tyon,Jud:e Presiding, and a jury, and the jury for - iff of the praist® fo c+ { { ‘’. Alexander na Jane Alley, j \ ver ic } a\ Syie ¥) o2 > ‘ i“ 2 : a dict havine answered the issues sutbmitied to them in favor ie this hh : . we yy ; nd being ‘8 set out in the record: © Cause coning on to be heard at this term of the Court ai " se 9 he 3 mee 2 mite f tard vefo and His Honor hav ing submit acy. > syti Wi ws : * hat the pial" re His honor, C.c. Iyons, Jude and a jury, » therefore, considered and adjudced by the Court t: Mark Phifer an it is Ved ¢) mtif the owner “18 following ise, Is the plaintif the % orced sues to the jury, to wit: First. d the defendant Berta Phifer be and they are nereby d2¥ f th © note «: absautely and the nu@e on eee 3 a = as alleyed in the Complaint? No : : ‘ 5 2 the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between and the a q en i her lain “cond: : i S don as alle; ed a3 plaintiff and defendant be and the sane are hereby dissolved, F Ts Jane Alley the owner of the noon OM Gaved + : ty v o a 4 $4 ‘ ~ a 4 ty © =} YU - Dv a a fi4 tO ) , ‘ = v Ss oo Go My es + eS a be : * @ D , : f3 £4 “4 c3 D 3 b SS “A 4 QO > «cs ‘ Sa by 2 D Ss 4H m4 _— ma 4 > > ) “ r 3 v Fy D> 4 3 5 m4 +? +? + am a — —_ — —= 7 HH @ 3 + 4 o o = ~ Pr is at on ze residing. ); mM v ~ " 4 : ; n o gy ‘ a i © e D o +2 @ 2 5 vb 5 » b4 v t> SG eb rt ) t J D Me oo) Ca 3 ef C 3 2 - 4 > r=) o - 5 > > oa + : ) > ~? 3 OQ = & x tH - oO 3 <= oS a Oo H ¢ = 4 = »” ee 4 3 cS C of » >> @ = vd os a ts ~ D » 4 } : to S oS a | $ 2 va 3S a oO ha ‘ o o oO rt 2 oS C a » > . } o 4 > a «a ° ? a 2 D ** 0D t S tH a a 4 ; : . - 3 1 3 . < Jo c Se . SS J hi rt ) cs ° “4 = . od co aj D » oO 2 u os = © ES oF) a > o U re : 5 ha by + Ja “i S4 o - ° So D a re) $4 o> Oo ° . ta 3 a 4 $4 » “A “i rf 3 7 oD » +4 = » + 4 a » o +4 4 eat - Sa v Oo oO w ¢ Se cS “A os 4 o ° - ~ fa v tte oO - 4 +? 4 a oe D o t S 4 cS » Yo Ss ~ J & 3 S mS o ° ° i 4 4 ‘ @ a £ ; am » oS rs 64 4 3 = ha oe 3 . co = & rt + » > D © vo re cS SS we 3 ‘ ~ 3 3 ‘ Q, . : © a i + 5 : » ) a . re s ere ep r4 > : > - S “4 oO ° tu S4 2 L4 Qo > - O° oO ria co D 3 Y LD a 35 D ) : < = Fa te D > > +? > “4 » 4 os ft n D > - ‘ 3 GH - ; > oc > 3 2 a +4 6G +2 : t4 cS S fa wa » = YP co So w »D - 3 GS SS + 4 ws he od A S a 4 S © a Hs - ‘ 3 =% < > $ @ et = D> ii ® @ et ®@ u a go So o A > “A te 2 - ed 4 4 4 - co - Oo <a %. ©o 4 ‘ om | ros “a4 Sa a eo ow <a a> ~ t » 3 a S a4 4 <3 » 3 2 A <s 3 $4 sa ° w a a cA @ oO wo t=) S ~ < > “A ba c v ~ - Ba . oe At eS os -~ o : “a 3 2 eo a © ®» “4 a ® @ A Soa 4 D> a a @ > > Bs co +> <3 - - “A a Sa o +> +2 3 4 ‘ @ 4 o @ ha 2 . a a va 5 a cs s+ fe ‘ Ss s: rt w2 bar 2 te - t o2 - 2 Db +? oO 3 os » Qo » @ 2 = — - = fs £3 c> a=] ©. 4 74 va “o Ba E ao =] td @ = ‘ e . ae - . = = 3 - a e » 8 = 2 8 si : ; o > ‘ = 4 © a = 2 ? 2 $ 1 <4 s2 4 - oS - ° a 4 ‘ he 4 x Po an = = - = nd = oe ss = - Bs Ss ~ e - = 38 4 + a . oe eS : 3 is oe a > 2 fs @ “A “4 ~ os = ad = ya 2 > a = a ° “A o “S < 7) s £ 5 > Pe - “eA Ss co = — 4 = 3 a a SS ws ° a :3 : — me ieee aS oS = > 3 5B 3 > } < » S “4 , o » 3 re = oO > 2 © > fa oF re ~ » ° D > ot ri a - 3 4 +? Sa o Ss ~ 3 oO . @ +4 wv : a ° ‘ : : cS » <3 -4 a oc oO a ‘ A : =a Ss) a] oS = ~ — © : = Ree ea f a © = 4 © 2 oO D ‘. g = c ce wa fa ; 3 . - m4 ‘ s ban ee 5. “oo 3 J o nH wv a + , F ‘ s J D +4 sc ® ° 7 o > cs c “nd a sie ce wt oad 3 3 Co 3 “4 on 3 DvD = - 4 9 oO ua 0 — r S °o > a > Co 4 Bn ¢ cs? x — 4 +? et Go Oo “A 2 w — - - ¢ 4 oe ~~ oO a 3 4 a + 4 iia r> oe ae 4 = D @ ‘ > = cs ~~ — ¥ -< a] a) wy o > “4 Oo oO a iz A 4 ” ee +3 ba ) 4 2 D : 5S 3 5 a a oO s ® > Oo ie + rt 4 Gs * 3 Be “ v = > “4 = - v o 2 oD . a ad t 2.8 Se “i 2 = oa ~ - . Ss $ > 32 Q 5 : a 3 ~ ~ = ve) : ‘ - b > 2 @ © “A 2 +? YD 73 r4 S Ly ‘J naa o - © a os a Fea} = 2 a c& ® v x cs. a 4 2 x = . dD 4 4 S ~ Sa cs » oO ° “4 a. a Oe a ee o ° — : oe D >» 9 Q ‘ eo: ee oe oO © a a ee ee oe ‘4 os © D> - a ca = Ree ee ee ‘3 a x a Cs . 2 pS D D a ee $4 ee wa © u 4 : ‘4 o ES ae S. oD S : a ‘ ) +4 » - > t od ws be a +a : So 3 f ~ ae ot : = oO ) : re) > A P 2 il a} a ~ v 4 ~ + 3 r rt . —_ e on ai ° ~ : a - = v et a ° co 4 a G4 SS 42 Oo a ro ~ Sy = se . ‘ . F “4 wr Hw rt DQ = o ~ oO <> DY oO » D + » : “ 4 > +2 rj > ” «4 «+r @ om i c + ~ ‘ a 4 c 4 43> 7 . at © > a naa) : 3 cs » os >, > = @ : se 4 & 3 o 3 a ~ 4 § . rg co} +4 — —_ Sin “s 3 3 if , v w > at 4 ei os 3s & +> 3 a a 3g > ro “¥ y si s U a AG oO 43 - 4 » ra oO re) 3 wn ho D > et e A Sow i. is : ‘ ae ° > uM =. <O os re a ee a ee eo 4 Se a oo. £ 2 eS oe ae ge YQ A 2 oOo D ee y = . , HM 2 M o ‘ = ee 3 i -<~ ° = i Oo 3 +2 ‘ - ~ 4 > Ss es = - _ : o m 4 BS — wt .. - —_ <. ra —_ 4 « = 5 one 5 -* ay _ D te ye + ei 2 “3g = 5 shay Oo o » > ~ > , ee a D D ry 2 <o 7 ~ ~ ~ « w 4 ‘ 4 a 4 f ; .S) c? = < = 2 es * s < “s H am 3 . ot se a qq = s z 2 4 4 > és 4 S = mn Oo Pv > “> oO ’ Pi 4 ? ‘ : Q . . ’ * : - > a °o £3 @ v g = D “4 S D t ' D : . os - 2 ne v +i = = a oO “a oO 4 cg us D 42> ge > e = 3 8 7 - 3 D 4 A s? v 35 4 _ _ co +2 > + 5 | > > = mg t+ = a s “" > 3 ° v ~ % SS M4 cS ® 4 2 oe 4 gy 4 _ ’ > a. 5 So Y ie : =) : ba %4 oO a = a 2 > Hw ct $4 +4 4 © ‘ oy = + - £ m4 +> > 3 a 2 : Oo D r ‘ 5 ) > 4 2 4 o - +4 S4 + » 9 5 o | 6S “s ‘ : : c a oc o D » 3 : s Oo ® 2 : ns ie = S EX > Q 3 @ “a a 2 Se ms as °o Af D : a ¢ ‘ » v eo » ¥ os 4 oO > - 32 r4 > $4 4 42 t : : 2 > ha | > 2 Wd S 5 ) 4 . 3 = — z 3 > wa é 4 3 : aes lee 3 4 ** - 3 » 3 e y 2 _ ° 2 ‘ > S4 4 a = > a oe ae ss o es A 4 “ ~s +? i ie : +2 2 Vv ' ) » D 4 3 Oo i = Ss 2 D : $4 ° > +» : » 4 ra 3S 2 > = 3 ‘ 42 co 4 a Cs re | ag > D : » 3 » : : 3 2 2 : Sa 4 3 ct = A . v S4 : ° oe > a * a 3 ow i r4 3 3 te bo 2 D 2 + D = < $4 L 2 3 ? = 2 > rt 2 3 a a ov a c 5 » ms 4 2 o ty a G G = ri wa 5 te +2 j ee ee mem ———= o> = Petecstenawarktnmanerae a: iawn A ST EE 4 a, = : Lhe of Alexander, forermar ills o! i ng ollow2 ¢ 4 na. \ 10 wad a5 Upo! ‘aid A Ly lea son ers v Pat State Vs. alt . a e 2d adjucrre Qe'endm@m t pay ; or’. 9 Sl Ge cam Fo State Vv $0 tion ac Fisher. Jim “tate Vie Freeze. vs. Lon ate a yen Court 4 y+ oy OU urned mh il 1 aid a G 2 t4 > aa oO o a -— = 4 a ordaerea ax Ata uli ard a & a’ y es Wi LiTULs nd LLY 1 uU rf) and ade “ G ie ‘ = v irdic Vv Aga@s, ba o lec « C 4. enaan e def ) wi u o . e » - S = ° o a = o +H . 4) a . é ® +2 - ° ~ O > —f\ ee ee 1911. 1, 4 a 8 Se to adjourn y ‘ accordi ¢ « eets Court £4 » uw a _ = c oS ony = ° » ° Ee Bia) .rue Affra) igaver, a. > > > ct a | rt 13 “4 Db . So YS Cc 2 ss ~4 o- os e > D 3 4 x 3 ‘ — °o a > J - Ls ~ oO 2) — x Dv - =} v4 +? > ills Lrue oO Atwell rrea a ‘ and 2 "Lave a_i ee te ~ rr se ae re er De aa4 Lrue isance, Db + sS > we ee = > °o Lv Db » ~~ Db 4 4 ~ 3 . 5 4 ~ 4 4 D _ — ~ “cy 4 = Y S . . +? » 4 . << tH b > > D ° +> “4 oS ‘o > ta i D . v = a 4 oO S > e ; S my - : ™ . ‘ 3 ‘ ; » - 9 4 _ So aS ret 2 + Co nn “ 1 1 ill > 4 4 a = . _ ve rH ‘ ~ gs a ~ 3 4 D 4 > ~ S > : oS ~~ r > ~ ~ 3) “ .- > - 3 ¢ So o . SS o Ss > > . 2 2 4 4 Dv - ? s ~ “ e oe Sa 2 3 wo © , > So oS : 3 oO 7 . os a 4 . 1 B 4 ; A oS 1 > D 3 4 > eo Go : N ? > co = i Is os o = — we rol = = 4 2 s ; - “A = 2 a te - ‘ - > =< “me > - 4 » s > ‘ > 4 5s e+ 53 3 > Ss » oC et ‘ c SS ve am - -~ - =~ “4 a a » 4 4 2 4 <2 c ‘ 2 : ~ @ 42 ° @ f a fesented c a C5 4 ad Dd S 3 s 4 4 3 D> »> . ~f o a . = be om | C4 - ~ 2 » a > — > a4 a Q oC w ve > 3 r4 be 4 4 > : 3 “4 Db et > : > oO 3 3 4 ‘ 4 D Oo U C4 he +4 ; " D > +? 4 - +2 +2 > a 4 e4 3 + D < . ) Db é S ba <= > . = ; 4 o > - = ? co S ? 4 ? a4 8 sc DvD 4 ae a vb ov > —4 S a4 r . i 3 4 ° c . 4 '. 3 r- “., 3 = 4 ~ 3 rf = = - “A oC = $ 3 > +2 = B o o LD wv : : = “a rt e 2 hy - 5 - rf o : v 4 “4 4 : v . . wa Ss : > “ °o So : “a 4a a +4 : J © D oO tu Oo m4 D te Ss hoe S. vD > -~ 3 S 4 = ) Dv a > S. » 4 ° 2 G+ 3 = Oo a > , i Oo Dv rt ee > ~ Bg: [G - D ® > aI a eH = > D v o = 1 S 4 = D a a 3 ; ae Pris 4 i Sy v 4S c nt : sa v S “a $4 Dv . raf - 4 4 2 D & co - © o w D - " » S4 : Le +2 3 r 3 “+ ty » 2 + 3 » : a + a > % os Z o +2 > 3 ®o : | i 2 oa : fos] - ba 4 ° S a S oe oS : ° — o D oe = i= ; a . 3 : ae 2 ? » : r i mM i «J 2 ra ® 4 a v } li LOa V e:'dic - Gir puilty. Plea ailing. 2 ‘Se dba wn Lilty. Plea Uulsance. ye wy eC Bail aliace ded. per Aw ullt; 7408 Qu). og BI At sca 2a iLiy re) 03 Prayer ireaeli 4 ued. ent. Prayer Jj uarn TULLLY Plea effers on eid the av vs & ‘oO udred a A a dered and or aj ty Iredeill Cow ia of « como! e co + ¥ vi uilty. Plea t. imprisonme?: * the term of his durin vy Ou: on , dell Ire muon jas" be confined to the co defendant i ed 966 oe and i c Cc months a COu Tr e term of iredell rm ~ u a LO s to work on the public road ired , + lbe 1 of his imprisonme! verr the durin County LL O74 srt oa pf TF meet oe ak Terai peene er Ce Sa ae Tee Sse ee oh eS = - , , Bee ee e ‘ a _ == —— seem a AE AEE AAI AT A - —— —— : n —————————— = ) CY P-OTlvLaMu a . eo ner ara ti ee PR et Pe A ‘eal. Tew > Laude » 3 £5 $4 : , @} : bis v ~ D © S +> > i “4 oO “rt - £ n Claude ectatea Vs. to, 118 ? ‘ <8 See pia sot price jigtn ati as resorese! Court to 1— wes 2 ~» - - “4 4 $4 4 ; » Db > 4 ° m8 + 4 . + . . TH *~ ‘ Ps o e . is ‘ > ss r rq - a2 a ‘ : ‘ oO oe 4 4 - + « 2 a -4 D > a} 4 - r : 4 —4 D - ~ ~ Cy . a .) « - ca ~¢ “g 4 4 Dd <= ‘ ro 4 » ~ tex dtintt™s s mn U2Aaty. Plea ordered 4 ‘ . t re Lt M4: at 3 ® ' : _ 5 és oH we a ‘ . . o +s ” . ' = ° pal > fy 42 o 4 » 4 -H - 4 ) ct . C ® $ 4 4 >> - ® ct £ $ a 3 3 a eH “4 . 2, 4 ° Fa} GH m » =) © oe D 3 3 > ’ : > 6 4 » : v . < 3 > s a2 & A, | oc “qj _ fee} Sy O = a w > * > - 5 r “> Bs ce cs < ’ ~ om + *) . ®D os | Se ~ ~4 + 2 fA “4 3 > iller AGU L > 4 a ® 3 v iling. ; 1 Caine Willz a Affra: Blm ° . » @ > » - + wn he Ss $2 ° ¢ ce @® hu u fe Ba N f4 © at ° °o D @ ~ @ £4 et ° ea . a - : - 4 duct - @ “4 a a a oO 2 u> 2 “> a > 2 > x =a = | — 4 . - ad . v i> S&S = » @ 4 * » wt dD te 4 » c rt = ct » Se . ¢ $ ” . 2 > pul a : “ : . . ‘ 4 : 7 P= 5 > ‘ ‘ ‘ > ’ ‘ =} mf » “ 3 > : : » n £ 2 +2 er “3 re 3 2 > 4 * < o 5 » f+ = S 5 4 =: ° — 2 ? is ‘ o S °o a © cs > : &! a. 3 a Py o> 4 4 , = ‘ = » 9 iO u 4 - - 4 4 3 » 5 ; “¢ QO 34 4 a) < a ‘ = a 5 a “4 “ a » ° 3 » » Fy = ° “a » a > Q 2 4 o . o : = 7 = f4 4 D » ’ 4 ; ‘ = ; ° 2 3 3 4 2 > ‘i = ps & a » . S. . > » 4 os <= D al ¢ ay 1) - ‘ aan) ¢ 4 > S49 ~ oO os ro 2 C » . co D ~ = ~ 4 4d OH @ +> 4 - A i D $4 : e. “x - S e ah ss ® , 4 oO 2 3 po Mo & . > a oO ? © 4 sad i + ) >) 4 4 . > 2 3 2 . . 4 ¢ ad ~ ro ay be a 1) 3 oO , 2 > = 5 : C ® v : 4 - . C : 7 $4 f i ty 4 - 2 cs oa ay 43 } 4 < . a 5 sf o © - o Bi -_ > : > » oO » - ; ) ¢ 3 © 43 4 Pe : » 3 ow o of . 4 : - —> M4 2 » ~ ~~ « 4 42> r ~ _ _ 5 > » c » . = a ve » 2, @ D S4 ¢ > C ~~ 4 v2 = = ~~ ” > ~ D ad C ’ > _ 4 3 < ; . * 2 - . ~ Ly re ‘ 2) oO ot 2 s 9 “ v » a $ i . we , 3 3 — ay e e « ‘ u ) oS a > . 7 = = ~ ~ o ° v wa 3 D 4 < "= 2 co ¢ ) D ~ ; - ~ 4 ? ot ws . or - “ $4 Sy t4 oO . 4 oS ? ro 4 ay ay a D o ¢ o > c - me = e ~ t. 2 C D 4 4 oe : D o > D ’ ® 4 5 ~ = , c ) 4 D ~ ‘ 4 na 4 n } : a ; i So xu ‘ . 3 z ‘ D > a] ' 5 5 2 ° 7 — a 4 4 o ) . RS Yo ta er 2 wer .ccordingr re : a . ? 1 . > ed 3 4 + ‘ e pall 9) ~ 5 ? aT = 4 Ys noni 4 ' { a << > oO ~ ¢ 2 4 e : ) ) ‘ » + ¢ e < t 2] Ly : | ‘ 4 <a oO 3 = —4 4 rn - 3. _ 3 > a > 4 _ 4 . ta ok ) > 3 4 HH a eR Ses ee i a an mae ae att " ~~ Le } | act ’ 4 $014, apy AUGUST 4 JAs . : ee 7 rroene a 4 er { eal ple Court eets accora 4 OM [7 Tone A. m me Our . ee a yonorad.e \ iy} { ~ ¢ aer. Ail < Giances t tne order retofore fevorltore made in +s. ‘ oe 2 t } ; f + SP 4 y . - 2 S Ve 2 od.0va 00a and Lawrul er fere noned . AV y ¥ a) ane 100 t ' , 100 tt the Court souse rid rrii. Agr) 5 i 2003 I 4 ’ A Us Vy, L by : is ; . Pp Summers “Sy s Fy tate + > ; ‘ ‘ + wow . 7 : Wie eae 4 el, . . 3 as 0% ° . ¢ 221 ’ ° i Tea ON, ow > ‘Oo ; . Ox, ys. y ‘> ri . : + } Murder. OWwralice ’ Trial 2djournme: eforth, % H. Hercen, 4+» Crawford, J. bia KS, sy uy O. H. S. Strou :. B. Troutman, &- Pear He oT Me Juadre Preslalnf.e o 4. oNGFPii, F. O. Hinson, '. C. Perry, } s} ; +. a venire and sowrn c. Pattersons arene i S £ tf ’ u . ve? : Oo OvVSrT ’ D 7 G . Feb mristy, C. Ly Moor [tas y WG iS araw T ror ’ al “7 . . 544 - . + bie eda oe Tfom the recular jurors and from th 1 _ 2on ee? nef hn Sells, *: 4nis Honorable Court tates an ee. . he 4 QLL 9:50 i QO ours takes an adjournment until Friday Aurcust 4, 3914 7 HW. “ Y Lt C At G = A OS Judre Presiding: v . a be a a fa 32 +> s _ 42> » a) Db S “4 » oa 4 ~ So a > he © » ¢ 3 : 3 a “ 4 ’ 1911. on - > +> a by 4 ‘ ty o 3 3 ° °o “ Oo ° a © c 2 a c ro) o 2 S c4 v c4 a ot t amr) ° a > x va e2 jo 2 a “ > 3 G = 5 a a2 xt rs + < f+ E ca — oO oO 2° oO OQ = = : <> = > : — : ° sS = ° = =< oO o n oO ae a > 2c » F 3 = , a of = = f a > +4 ‘ - . = ‘ ‘ - s « rt <3 = > - & ° : > . - > . « ; a : : " “a S ‘ v - > - > < : > : 2 - - t °o 4 ~ > La A ° » ‘ oe 7+ 1 ° - co - °o Q fs nm 2 - 3 oO ce | —t - + GS fon o - ‘ - : - se3 a a t a = cA 2. = oO - \ ~~ = Qo ‘ ¢ 4 4 - ii ft ~ - «4 ba ™ ° Hw oO \ > 2 C - = - - a » ca : c : - oO Xe 4 ~ oo » - » co GA Sn - ie 5 > Be 42 - : - i> - 4 » - - ° a - ™ 3 ‘ =, > 2 Oo % -« Oo i 4 o ° > | » <t > f4 2 t. « . 4 Aa on) 7 - | =) @ 2 @-; > NY =m c fer % ro f4 4 ~ e fa o> ® . . - - rl 3s Sa aad . . n = +> ee AJ ° 2 @ = D «<< 3 - ¢ > > » > . i tH “4 » onl r* : s > 4) 2 an bo = = —_ - ~ c = a - c a » 4 - fing ® a ; << 7 © Ss 8 t sc oS oy : > Z - pes ta anos » 1 «~ a} ~ - oe » 5 s : ~ - A. et Yi «na E 3 pS +? 2 r4 3 Sa - 4 Se oO cS 2 ~ + : » st O° ra . » a | oc : - - ° at oS o 2 : - © ® ray ° ‘ he a > S Sea —a— > \i D = - oF : t - 4 ? - - oO + & - £ > a Seto -t 4 +} n fy > . + . << = ® “4 - | © t ° Oo mn > « 4 on ~Aa } D> 9 - ? - - . . - < . a] 4 | » a | ¢ 3 3 o ot i Ps - i by ¢ o * ct < t am © 3 . 4 ° be - a c g . 4 uh ° 4 a © Mt y Sa oe os he D - . iy ret > ‘3 ty 4 th + : 4 Se ee > >| 2 a “- ea . . Ja - » ji fa Sy - - . ® Oo oO » ; Ss - Qn C4 = ~ a= aa 4 \ @ ) = > c - vy * 4 ‘ - . 2 f ; = = 2 2 e oo es by ° Yh AgoS a ae Sy 9 : 4 - Pe] 4 ~ Q Se 4 - o . . . : 3 @ ceo - co ¢ «- -~ «~ ad a -~ ~ c a ~ - . . . . D = es ce * ee D ee : my ° { e ty ‘ a - OD 2 | - 3 42 + t oO Oo & 3 - . rt et < > C S A © co a ool ; + - . . a D a ®@®D « << A : +S) > » @ © Q . a ; $4 - - . . ” 4 a Bri ‘. < tH u c ot 29, D j ae = 2 a See : oa a > we mo ff Nt fy FE © - -~ + ' - > . wD 3 or4 ty ow hy $4 on ~ > O° «a - — - : oe : oe ‘ a > ° - - : ‘2 o . o Se oe - Df, Oo ad = ee . ee z - x a 2 v wn c J + 4 % a « oT a c ATS | ‘ ~~ ) : 4 . t @ : ha os > . < O° ° oO ~ w rs) fy } D ay v F ° ° t - hy oO a = oO : . « G4 Ss t t ° : - Ee ao? > r M4 oO ° * a : te => +» ba iS = = - - ' ‘ re aad So © ° ’ : b D o o . ne > b> 4 o . x u o rd = oO - +> 7 ha ‘ ei 2 v2 $4 } Gi, - ~ . 4 ty pu D c. 3 9 0 v . a C 3 . . - v : ' : c . : ~ O4 ye > . « I 4 ~ eo > - . te) . ° < . : %. oD a ° , 5 D m4 $ yA 2 3 v : © 2 3 . “4 - ty < e oI 3 =a . — 3 o oO m4 ~ 4 ® 4 ae - ra Ly KH C D e . - ; D oS CG ® Q - ‘ ‘ " ‘ t4 MM D 4 oO fA = 7 — 2 v > +2 c D > ‘ _ - = a = cE se - —--— a eet = | ‘ ne ’ * ;ury, uillty + u tne cha ‘ ed "ailed. led. o c > ae = 4 ~ ©. oe | e - » = . . + a SH ad -" a o n 3 —t ‘ = > 3 . o > a x 4 - ws S 2 ae cv +? S ha ; : co > > v » 3 S > a c ~d oO ° i oS D . + o a “4 . s on . 5 . > : 4 3 - ey $y SS o re) Dy o BH ~ 3 . et x c3 M4 = S4 = & = : - > » a oO ol a ° ® = ° a ° ~ - > = 2 » + c4 > — ° wd =~ > 2 = $4 re cc : 2 o o > ns . > . . XS et So e D . o co ® Ss 4 o4 cS a 5 - . 3 v | c dee Dv 4 -¢ -~ “0 + —d f -— _ co S oe 3 x - ( c | = me “ @ 3 oe - 2a eS) . 5 ¢ a4 oS Q “4 49 +> SS ty PS ( je b&b 2 D a oO 3 D °o L 4H ™ | 5 4 $2 . . e . - PS >> Tc ° > xs 02 - : £: to c > Qo ‘ ) . S < » 5 ~, 5 ° % ” , = @ ‘ ° . - - u3 rf = oS S > D < ro - ca 2 £ . « : x g “4 » — ‘ . . y ‘ ‘ n 4 “ > - o > ‘ vd va ~ a td - nm G4 < oS ~ ° 4 : 2 8 : > ° 3 “4 oo] = >) >> -~ ° 4 “4 *, - >> ms $4 = Se - => - TC 3 2 4 Me > "2 o ®» So » tH 2 - : . . ~ ° aul ‘ ~~ + c Zs a = 4 a4 3 a os < <a 3 < c ~ - +2 Fos » U -4 : : = = 3 o °o n 4 oO - - > 3 . 4 G4 a © GB ° 3 ’ o : s ° . ° : <4 @ rr wm o> : - : - os “re x ty “A . . » bs =) GH ~ - ® +2 c= co} - @® >, ~ oO <sc na - co 2 2 a3 ao co =e ce Oo : s . = 2 + : 2 = ° ° | a rs os << Po 4 = » f. a 3 a @ oon . a > - : ¢ ka Ls @ ~< 3 cs m » — 5 @ - s2 - on 4 oO » > 7 D> @ 2 : se ee : Be ‘ > a > : . ° > es ) 4 Ba = 4 3 ' > > ” * > = o ~~ S - «2 + oe » ~< E - st : - 2 4 - 4 * » » 3 az ® ag = ‘ » 3 = . os : : : 2 = 2 > . a s ‘ 5 . . oa a2 2 a 4 | “3 \ > j S. wo 3 gsi ‘I pd ~ _ - i oss py 4) 2 D a &* q ‘ <a = . a ~ - cc a + pe ee eee © 4 = q 7 a? > » = ‘ “si > ps ™ .. D +» 3 i t os ; i] %& a J » . 2 e § > +? ° § i D > + n ; 3 a ° 3 - 3 t > 4 3 a ‘ So S as te 4 3 ; . 4 » ~ ~ x "3 SI ‘ a ) i D <3 & U » ° ty > Te > i ‘ $, “s = s - - ' ie < 3 ° ® » Ly = =) » © ‘> iia — . 4 — : 3 > ; 3 : ; Sy ro) ) < WM HO < on Tee. oO 2 D> P) [* — ‘ . ° 1 a . ; ~~ a = ees af » Q ce . - c = , =. o Oo) hUwredl : 8 > 2 ‘ ~~ ty ee : = < ; * » co C4 cs ¥ oi 9 » = s, 4 e : ®D om ® : r > ; ; “a - 3 va a 3) | ) ~~ a fe : : oO ee ' ~ + . = o a ® x a : ‘i ' * @ + 4 ® > >. sy ce 1 ® % eS Me 5 . , = ° = a ‘ ha Co Oo eH SS » ‘ - J 4 = c o be oC sa iy a US ' tH > o “ee _ D 3 92 = a ; = : a c < ¢ - ~_ - = Q ow e 2 ‘ O ‘ss by —> 3 » 1 i cS - ®D 3 a | oC a Oo a +> S ~ o : ye : 3 ty ° ; < ° > ym ~ D 7 o - - a C 2 a) " - U cS © +2 a q @ ¢ . e . 4 » La — a - xs BD co = » S ant . a ae - $4 b S es oS tM ) D is a “ o ty 3 a ee ee ee re a > > z “4 ~ © 42 ey - oo < a) = Ms GH = 4 > rs) — ~ e - vb 2 f, > . D ~4 om m a a _ ? me > D > D v TC >) = e . D by $. » ” . , ° 5: ; < 4 = ? ~ a b i t —4 4 > - . . 4 —4 $4 iil a > °o ~ ‘ = a t ay 4 ee] é iy 4 2 a ‘ e < = . t oO 2 y i a. hi, a < ie <= 4 » a ; sae R + ve <4 ~ . et 3 . 7 a : os t 4 4 = : = 4 eae eee —~ ow . = er mene 4 culty &@ nov Ple: Y ' ee D. x Lands. tTean prae Murdock, g \ Alexander, '’. ry . se + ~ =. Alexande Y Overcash, Jordon, Ads: failed. and Capias. Qa n » ~l rf D a npas anda swory ‘ . beins 9) + Ful cuilty v 10% the defendant 7 find ey D ; j “ ° . ¢ - c Oo " va +9 < $4 > ® . > es Cc 2 a .- cat Se A D 3 - - Sf . al ® . 4 f <x 7 C 6 ¢ = ee bas x «= > od ~~ : » o Zs os a ' c J - S 4 ) | . c = y aa » 3 4 “ 4 en} rt 4 54 : wy 2 q 4 € . 3 ® ‘ 3s +2 <* b { ed +t rd . < = . 7 n~ ‘ on ‘ - r < = —— 3 © 1) A a os . . . . ° 4 « “ 4 4 OQ - 3 4 ‘ ’ v and 2 +i " + * 1 er - ’ ar eiled 4 v @ oO +4 Be a “4 D reauc ea yr) Leto CU ry "> Gaiiii withd S ao ne rene + vi ps upo? ued. nti Capiags ji Plea vai Li Overcas mnnerly empleton, eins che ye ~uilt) gt ‘ v y find “a ral . ~ . 1 +} I say s Allison no and verdict aG od oj 3 os ix f aA > 2 w a rt 2 -rd AOL le ’ u . . 4 r t . ireadway anelled Li en and 4 Orniss aie Worn defen « ‘ L fs f4 Dv 4 +2 6+ ?) ~< Oo a ore ~« < ts ur — D - nl = « = ta °o 4 So =e) = = : «4 2 Oo —~ ws : -— pak v2 » -— > ‘ on : = + -~ < : fy . at cs | oO . -4 eq Oo - H a D ke a © “ rs ¢t) 0 - SS . a ~ ~ pull ~ = A 4 v , ive no %lea xander, ~ c Affr Allison i - — n v - ~ oe ae > ® ~ 7) Sy es : o o 0 Sta 4 o ; Y in guilty od anaer, Ale: 8s, ah ere \ GV of vu rie 7 DD rnere t i AIG LE Vivo Teac r vi ’ . rmnpleton, AVG elled their verdict emp ar ano swor: 6a defends \ A v Allis > hazrlic t e v “4 sa) D 141! Vvuaes vs 2 SAD . T @ ve ua aeis staili 31Qarit V um of 200 Q a vwWO La, ava <¢ na he iaVa G “O0Qa of ~ law 1aerea. revoiore ve Gs Yardiect uilty ey. arc e! tne ,v ordered GH ir + I no: Con s of sal public roads the ) A “nea tO Work Or 51 aQurin . imprisonment. 115 r t 0 term ne vi "nak nae = me aaa as ie Pe - Ss. = Oe oe ~ : D : ° ’ “ ° S ~ — > Pe ; - 4 :. = » D » 1 3 = cs ° wo 3 ' ; oS o > ty » $ S 3 M4 & > ‘ 3 ; 2 $4 ° A} 2 rs’ 5 S A oD a S Se > a < ~? 2 +2 2 a £ a Oo Ss % S ° 4 » 42 ; 5 4 > 3 >> = > -~ ss a = ° > 2 > +4 “ oa : ¢ . 4 ° 4 3 C ~ = > o 4 _ = E —4 D Do > i es wo es “*; a > x eS ae D ae 4 x oe : - 3 2 3 0 MM } 22> 2 S 4 = D » © a Q > > ¢ % 4 na “ _ ; oO D +? oO +9 - 4 ° oF -? th a 3 i) = 5 oC 4 = D ~ 5 O » = - c 4 8 MM D 2 4 3 S > a “4 4 : $4 4 2 _ 2 - 5 c 3 o 2 > ry oO 4 2 on 2 > , 2 =q D re ” 4 > t Sages er es — wees: ranma ne = - pelanenes pratt oe 3 eR eee eee serreag neers sere er ar seas tee ae Se ete rte doeimnere ly — erm on -_-~- ose Sra at 5 ; > a a “4 1 , > » : = +s + ~4 - c> 4 HH & 4 ; Cy Z ' - = 2 co ¥ oO . 1 42 o : : a : <A ° » : _ t ee = vD - > 4 42> ‘ : 5 - ) | co : v ° oH 5 a 4 D 53 Pe - s . . ° G4 &G : oO - vo s - - . $4 ma) c 5 . D > 3 oS ms ™ 3 M4 ony D Se i 7 : = E ° . o » . cA dD & +4 @ : ; ; Z , — 4 < ty o> = . 4 4 i re r , : : % - 4 3 3 2 : + »~ 4 : D ° . a Go 4 . » = = i oO © < is > . > : S » 3 — ae 4 & » Ss : 2 > = 3 o3 ‘e) 2 S 3 > ty 4 > . 4 e a : d a ~3 . = 2 . 4 > - od D > Uv oO 3 » D : - » ; ‘ oO oO +2 » > G4 : ~ > i S : 3 oO > aia 7" a . “ . aA , L@a a 977 As Qi + Vet uraer C . + y ” c yn ith the Sh : ; ; O v2 Ss ; ry 1 a oO D > - 4 4 d ‘ ? & a ’ ° b> 8 " r a “ ma c 1 ( C C d 1ereupon a : j . » fe > os : “4 »> = > ; - s oO > oO » u “ +> > wo w 4 © ; t— D> 4 4 ea ° tt . te 4 » > = = 5 wa c wa : ra + sa 6 x 2 = 2 oO - ec 4 2 » + » , » ' ‘ -> 4 . ‘ > < a> + ‘ s 3 = +4 : - rt 3 3 wa v a] w “4 4 rt © 4 . Z is bos ‘ L wo 4 o rt : oO 4 a oO 4 ¢ : ‘ . ae - rs “A “w ~ — v @} wi } D ‘3 ) ~ ‘ = 3 ca 3 Y va 2 et | rt 2 . c - re 5 Co ve) 3 } Do D et uo 4 3g . re q ‘ ~ ® Sin] - . L wu os 5 ; e GS x +4 4 4 ™ . oO 2 od 2 3 42 G - D ° ‘ D : ts os 2 $ c yy a a ed. 32 Cc ja co va a D . » a v 3 pe) “5 SS ot ri cS $s . : et + a 2 a > i CT a Ja 3 4 » > ‘. D 8 tr 5 c 4 4 om | _ ~ 4 . os & ay 4 + 4 42 = ic : 2 co ‘ 4 . t 4 N . - m4 . t D > eS m4 ‘ ti | - . wo ot 4a “J 2 a = Q N Dd 2 a” Sy ~ 2 _ » . ‘ ¢ 4 “| Seg or nace aan SU es ee Secor : 7? ) é is aece ea by . é rh mae : . pr 2 iv 5 In the Superior Court. ae} ‘derec and aajuarea vy rOurt that the cefendant Confined use j ‘ July Term I9II. bien ne co aid of Iredell Count for the term cof ray (5 ee ’ jredell County. Ae MES i ; f j 1 ih ( as:icned to w kK on © public rouas of iredel] ct CR A va The American Laundry Machinery Co, # F . [ Va . MA 44 v8 ‘ (ap aoa We oe ie ? bain % r | an y. C, Harwell. i a ; | : | 2 3 th S i Your ~~ ‘ { ( { “4 mig eause coming on to be heard at this term of the Superior Court of Iredell County | nerore his Honor F. A. Deniels, Judge presidming and it appearing to the Court, that, hey adi | % 1a iter aL oe .t) Th T iy + cvs AS i adh ai © e * Aai me we Maa a. this is an ection 1p0Nn promisory i notes anc the plainti?? havins verified tie | | vie - t ! | i i ‘ complaint to whicn the defendant has failed to epper and answer and it aopeering to | the Court, that the defendant is justly indebted to the pleintif? in the sum of iA \ | | ee i Oe gon2.59 with interest thereon at 69" from the [4th day of Jan. I9lo which said sium {i secured by mortgage pon personal property mentioned and described in said 2G. . complaint. | It is therefore considered and ad judeed hy the Court that the plaintif?® recover q ey) OW pn of the defendant the sum of $042.59 with interest thereon at 6° from the T4th day of | | Kt Jem. I9I0 which said sim is hereby decla ed @ specific lien upon the personel ; property conveyed in the chattel mortgage of the defendant to the plainti f as ~ 4 @ S ' ) described in said complaint. 4 It is further considered and ad jud ‘ed by the Court thet the said property be levied { upon and sold by the Sheriff to pay off an: discharge this judgment as ‘ar a: | jhe same will do 80 and the plaintiff is herehy authorized and permitted to hid oe ee © ee Pere snd heeo ; Ag +het, the niaint it | yy na become purchaser at said sale. It is further considered ani adjudged that the plains iB , ¢ ¢ aereac es G 3 OCEk ; "ecover of the defendant the costs of action to he taxed by the Clerk. + A. Daniels i ee Judge Presiding. Z r "7 4 c = € f - ; ) orae LLOW 1 VY, ar le, Zz ennerdy , a gs . , j lexande ’ i 0] ’ ' keton, ©. t. Combe, J. 4s Treadway, - dock }eine sworn and empanelled for their vene™ n+ itruec ftbnara and a nistrial ordered and case cone gust 10, °°" e Li a) arn t 43 ) O A ‘ arsday Aug Z i ee / < J * . one Jude Presidi «¢- — 3 Geo = ae North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court. Tredell County. ) May Term, I9II. M. C. Verrell, Admr. ofthe FstatK of) Samuel Ferre]1, deceeaSed, Plaintiff, ) VS Judge nt. Southern Power Co. and the Dixie ) Cotton Mill DefenDants. ) Thia action comig on to be hnearb at this term of tne Court and being heard before his honor C. C. Lyon, Judge a da Jury, and the dury heaving answered the issues as set out in the minutes of the Court: It is therefore considered and adiudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant , the Dixie Cotton Mill the sum of fifteen himdred dollars ($T500.) and the costs of this ection to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Cc, Cy DOR, Judge Presidi ng. Carotina ' dl vOs T 3 (‘9 7 i Ie C ut di val bed ee ina ee ——- cy ) rf ‘ — > 4 ail c Dd 4 ¢ + rd > = a a FS .. a, ° « ry c r+ Pa ; - +4 ¢ ” 4 ; 5 ‘ . S4 { © 4 : 4 4 > > — y 4 ) 3 ) es Ss ais Me iaceneciees ape ee os — . p x eat ees ae ——— na, ty. . y aac rol Coun N¢ we ‘ 4 » “uc - rs {3 — 2 — bd rs > he eo S4 Fa : of ea 7 2 ot » ——_—— lebte< Ana (Or A aT ata La ry notes bh BS 4 buchanan ev) ve , , 4 be ~~ ~ es a 1 - 7 > B+ =f « 4 SC ~ WV -~ Ye “VX G+ » -+4 4 Ls vy before i val "Cy? Se er i a e - . . ms S . _ - 3 f t 5 ’ + - : o ee oa : art = ~~ » P . © c ~ ~ ‘eer ~ eo : 5 = e + z . fw 2 °5 % « = * ¥- - Sd ' ys . oy ; ¥ 4 “ ‘ ba - ‘ ; 7 + ~ Gq + - - r ~~ : i : sa ¢ c - < ) 2 ey ‘ ; ~~ cs 4 * 2 . , 7’ Cc - ¢ t ‘ cs . Ms e C +? 2 . ) : - ¢ 7. c é ¥ . € + " 4 + ’ 7 c 7 + ; . > - 4 ce c * "xz a ae . a ree , +? “ Es + : : e < . z ; 7 + 3 . ; : . ; . . ’ = 7 ") 4 : f r~4 r : ; : > , ‘ ; , - Ps - c ° ; ~ : ~ . ; ‘ t4 es © 4 ee ; t ‘ ; . r ’ < ; ot ; y ‘ ; e Pi : c : + ‘ , ps * e 7 ; + 4 . Pe ~ f + 2 Gi ? 7 + . t ‘ e ' + ' ‘ * . Gq ¢ ‘ % a4 as rt a - Ife ide auehlin , + Cae o. 10 on the lands Ye PY ma «4 bloe tlle at ESV 4 av As a ed 4 u ‘ * Southwe Sy a * ? a _ , the nay ace ee Re ee ell re A 4 < f ' = a ~~ Y ! 7) “ct a “ c ' ~ c ~ & 1 ¢ “ ' b ° <r ' ' e ' fy 1 , ' i x a . ' . : ' ' ' ' 2 ' : ' ° aa : 4 ' + : . = i ; ° o vu : a 5 rte < ; | i! Percent @ Seemed > - Q = 4 D S “4 4 Ss a = b 2 ma 3 >> w v» o ‘ 4 se 3 % fe. 3 : ? 2 3 Sy A uy . > 3 cg - $ » ? re | co <c fu = - } Dv } v u S 4 3 2 : < c= a oO N o . So 3 : v D oO 3 > D a < YD F- 3 4 - > > 4 » ; > D ty ba » 4 » a tO » : cg 3B oO $4 » q Ee +2 og ; a © = : : Cc : a * e : 5 5 D > > D oO -4 , oO 5 3 bs ) s) C by = v e ¢ . ! os ‘ HH re : © w w 3 S 32 1: 5 FF : os r a} 9° > : 3 _ > a » - . ~ ; CG ° 5 ; Se Mee e D i oa } 4 b ‘ a an < ms Bee, - ) “ Cc ’ . ? . ¢ ? oO el o by 2 + < ¢ res he wD $ i + ~ 7 ow = ¢ 4 Db Ge 2 4 : c - : % a | . 2 n ‘ oO 4 — ot * : a 3. oa ~ - a eS DM rt 4 s >> — 2 » ‘ > <= > t - = t+ = 3 uw “4 S - w a 3 > et 3 ¢ > 3 oO Ss o = 4 3 » ° Oo Ke n a » M © oO t. 3 n «< cs 3 G4 Cc > oo = » ® 4 » ‘ o a « t-4 *3 4 $ 4 ° +> 4 4 a oo 4 . = », t oO - 4 . > co ts Ss % ‘ - <3 Sa 2 - <3 > » ot : ° fa ox 5 - « aS «4 a os os — M4 c £2, ‘ = : =- — ; - a » & 2 fi 3 ‘ = = > “4 ss » 4 3 « ; 4 > : o g ‘ o 5: <3 3 » ; os s oO » we - = v2 oO © | a ay rt » $4 3 Dp 4 ct r~d y < : ; ot » > oO ’ ” , » > GH >» 3 R e : D » ' w > D fy > ? » > c4 3 » > wo . i) ? 3 3 : » 3) ry : : oo) : ~Y he ’ 4 ’ £ -4 4 - a OS “ . - re a S¢ ™ x ? 4 4 fk 3 4 rd > > ? e ‘ <2 ro co 4 cc »D £ O° n oS : > ~ 4 O ws ge ay 7 om ae e ~ + ~ zz ® ) Sy by a > ) i 4 < ; . os D co os ae 4 .. > R Q _ D - » > $ 4 4 oO ay 3 ) < > c » 3s . + > ‘ » ‘ oO 9 3 i * 4 Co > oS - J ” a SS 4 4 , a] Dv be | u 1? ‘ 2 8] nQ = ~4 Y ‘ ao ‘ 2 ve} 1 » ’ =f 3 4 os ha = S : 4 4 a e 1 c > ‘ a > ’ o a 2 7 $ D eq t a= 4 C . 3 r4 ) eu D < ) 4 o ¢ ° be + 4 4 t 4 ? ¢ 4 > - 3 pol oO ~4 . % ny I » -+ > cS 2 4 D ar ; os 4 wo v 2 3 » » > - , f > 3 » ) » ® 4 ; ) ~-+4 < 3 » : > . — - , 4 3 by — 3 q © i ~ ay ) .y ) 4 4 = > * ~4 1 , +) 4 4 4 4 4) 4 > ’ > *) ¢ car ee Tete ate and 50) Judge v . ib od “~ feo 4 a : 3° > 3 3 > 3 > “— ane ai a ° > > ° . } ; 3 GH < co 3 > © o » ‘ A a » © « a a oe oe ee ° y . 1) 3 Dv > oO c4 > a = ¢ co — < o ie 2 a . bx, © > oS Oo { 2 { % ~_ 4 5 "7 c: O .) +2 oO c rt) ey 4 ° > : C 2 Oo a : m4 oO te "4 ° a os uo me a o by D +? ~~ nN 3 - > coe ‘ 2 7 » > = E C D oD : > 5 5 i ww Se - > , 3 . goer 4 : ~ = ° 4 . . % - ) 4 ° . 3 > ~+ 2 v2 i - G4 4 a D = C4 3 3 a « s 4 rf . e+ ¢ ‘ ‘ L ° rf z +4 ” «3 ou | 3 o - » 0 4 a ‘ » 4 » 1 9 i: c - % > 3 ” + v a = > 2 a ‘ 4 cS - I ~4 O 4 oy . “| v 4 2 uw 2 rs 4 > A 3 oO «Pe 2 0 > - . — » et Q > n »D - i < e, = = = “ wn LAY I ied co i + } Carolin Qu L@ayue, oe . » a 4 — ee E x 4 S4 a - 2 cs ae a > °o - ’ ine > oa > £4 w2 ‘ Ba » - <= > » £ ¢ > t+ co c : ot 4 c= 4 + c s - - @ “cd : o ; 4 Fi _ > 4 os » — a] > - co og ¢ oOo oO » ol - = 2 a oS co as -t » £4 oS —t = 4 > < = “4 » o> Oo . _ ~ ~ ‘ - . 7“ o > ° D s Dd “~ 1 wa £ ) } » > ra S b os 5 - 2 a J . D saa So = . aa - + f “4 " ” 5 y 7) < > “+ 2 ¥ ie te 4 4 ‘ >} 4 a > K ; > ao dH sc 4 Tc Db é °o . > . y e = ' o = e , so . v o ) i $ a4 ) by 3 , vb o o SA 3 o- % b 2 , * 4 “- ? > 4 i ow » 3 » 4 . iS » eo - 5 - 2 ~ = — — - 4 Y ? So - ” Qa SS 4 ‘ ct d te rt = © > <3 2 2 > - t ‘ wy ° < Co 4 D = -+ ~ $y = ry - : ep 4 > = “~ > wa + ; 4 Ps —~ _ . o r4 > f. ) 4 ¢ ~ tH + fy 4 > > 4 ~ nD a “4 oO a 2) 4 7? 4 > C 2 ) -4 ; C r = 3 4 x ) + 3 » > > - ‘- > 3 ’ oe | . 5 x a= < oO x D > . od E » 4 3 . = ~ ty 4 4 . et wo 3 j Oo 4 a 4 3° > 4 4 D » 4 “3 ~ 7? > ” : . oO “ e ® - a ° oS - 4 ‘ ~ ~ r= oe . In J Y ’ J Yl oa) f H+ - °o C 4 x) ‘ 02 ° ° t n ) 4? > re oO ' 0 6) c me ‘ © C ¢ SS © _ v one S “ct re © + — ma s ; : Ss G+ & o~ a a 3 © - - - 2 ~ g 4 : 02 e _ 2 E < 1 . - me ' : , > es “Sa e * Ss + “2 . $ - = . - x > - > - eo > : + Ss 27 td i - + ¢ ~ 5 1 s ge rs ' : ;: ¢ > tO 42 et 3 ab Ss © w2 os 3 cs oO ° ss 33 s ee O ¢ - E #2 nm <> cs ao = > > °o +2 > tH - ri @ £ 2 2 by <> ci o c t rcs 3 oO 4 £ + re 3 .— 1 ft ct ws ys > as ae o oS es) os q s . *r = cs ° tH : o on] S be @ nN e= > o$ ad es o rs - 2 e 4 b- ; "2 a = > - ra 3 °o <S _ of as + Pam ee ee a oe" SS st ph ET ng? - : - : as = c - . . - a , @ S 0 ~ ne - p= +9 on Ss : +3 ~ tt ~~. C2 m ~~ 2 w = Cc +? co ret © G9 ~ ba - . a © Ss 3 oO - Y. ’ - r ‘ - me va as ’ oo us ors , ws o2 >» C Be aaa ~ tH hereby a la lle 5 Vi on Amn rcheser at 3} al Ce Lid we as 17 es “ alin ‘ a } - f+ a 7 al } } y 4 i + ¢hoe anie be CcOnrTiTT.9¢g and a deed be made e nurchsser ; a that the sale | ” os + | ser upor I commend Une nee nt of the purchase mm neye roumen U sa r 4 } pay! Geo. . Jcnojson,Comni ne , By 2 7. = 7 ‘iw . . chu ls UL: e Ae 4 . \ . ni nev e ard the pleinti¢ os t n { S into 4+ Le - 4 yee 7 4 ‘ yy nsidered by the irt that 1 Cause jg orth Carolinsa I In the Superi or rt sCilie € A * 4 ” 4 4 7 ~ m i yed , 9 / + x7 { rly Te } l t t 1erk, Tre 7 vOounvy July ‘ iM, 2911. . 2 = 1 se . vi ~ iS ae. vhas. LiImMs | JU re ij) of oo JI : Vs | JUD , Frume ‘ [ Loy Yotinn Sere ‘. $11 Tne , - Le r Uli { J i ° iG e { 7177 pe ’ Mrs ¢ . Ce , v 4 ’ | ‘ T MENT. Lit Cc is¢ mi Ne on U Of mmrd atl 12% I? i yD n ‘ oe Piet 1 gw a j fo... Daniels, Judge Presiding, and it ny t t n filed, the summons being ri 1a vethro Yloss Defendants. SUuSe coming on to Superior Court: ead compleint i * Tredell County Bo e Sti DE that the dei superior Court of indebted Mr. , 10 sun 1 ’ Wa . Jt as nered Forty Three ($243.00) Dollars : ee 4 dder to public sale to the highest bi NC. [re eee eee Loa s loor of Iredell County, in Statesville, her fore, considered and edjudged thet the pl intiff recover ; oF : nds O'clock M. after due advertising the lend ss vna ¢ ere Gere “{nts the sum of Two Hundred Forty Three ($245.00) Dollars n the complaint in this action when and wh Prine: y re si? pel i : £4 An . te oh ee bi ider et the and Intere; > from the 28nd day of i ebrue zy 1911 ‘ unvil Nad d. Gadl\a ~si ¢ (eu { C a vbw v It 1s furd¢) . m oS ip } * . Bee ‘ 3 ; 1 sehment 1a etof re pey the purchese money J ther considered by the Court that the attachment her 8Vieg Upon + . e- P } en a there! ore r ; ~nhe 7 and of Cou aty be ana the } . . aa 7 ny) 7 ind reaconeble one the defendsnts situated in Iredell — “ —— se ~ = it MA Te FS sys REEF a Lar 2 epee tees 7 no age ~ Se eee ere er a ee ‘ Oo ¢ “A : © ° > © < _ c 2 - > ¢ > r S S : S m4 3 ~ ps ¢ ~ 2 + a ‘ ep > : ¢ > ¢ My . c a c » - S ri c ? a =~ : © oo aa A ey “6 eS rt e +e vs ~ = 2 - ~ © Cc ¢ + o ¢ Oo > _ © ©) 2 5 a ry 2 4 i “- z - 22 m c “ oO sae >> _ Ss eo @ > Bb 8 S . i 4 aQ z + S S a i Q a ‘ © Se ct f <= + © ° © oO oS = &D & " a, = r Cc c C et oS 4 . . re 1 aot O oO S +r ~ rc © G . Ss S rr Ss & oO oS 4 ©) Uo >) © - x -~ F c rf = a oe we ~ e ~~ _ ® i ~ o a . ia a °o > 2 S © & Q) u r= 42 ~ © ~ r > ~ ~ < ao ao S - i > a ‘ rs a ore ae we ~ ~~ “~ ~ \e/ = e2 4° a. - a a eae a oO ui ies oO ee oO ‘ = oO + C - a — 3 > > ’ + fe © <2 ° Ss : ~ = rs GS ‘ -" : + C O gi ® a < =} Ha © - a o . _ : 4 . od 4 > 4 . ci a £ rt pa od > ” saad a) a . ¢ a ES = *r ° oO s : + = ~ v4 L cd ~ ay ~ ~~ rc s — rc 63 Cj +4 4 Po | » CS © : ~ <! Me 2 aoe a é C + ~ +~ E: a © “r © “ct Ss : m4 ct “eo © @ Q Ee: c <2 tu) 3 4 wn a SH r=] 7 od ° — “ct S xo © - © > s s © an] - > a 2 Sa & @ cS ’ abe ~ + <3 mM cS co © $ ° “i @ @ 1 m4 oO ° g a = "0 +4 a = = - < = oS cS < = — - = © os a Da + = H 7 2 SS 3 Ss +? ~~ to4 < c. @ ond ~~ + Co sg = + ° cH 2 °Q @ 3 S on) hb 3 wm < as e~=t . 2 on) a 3 = ps + 3 > 2 > © ‘ ~<a ee = +> ana es + ‘ ¢ v2 tet BS <3 a ; = ‘+- <= a — + @ 2 S oC ) < s 4 oO gs £ +> s ms > F = @ = we ss = Mh ~~ a rs +4 od oO . Me ¢ - ye) cS a al g bm ~~ a] e be °o et = S <s ws co - * rt < 2 > +? ms SS Sed ~ co Ea e " 3 os +? = B no Bs a ag > a 3 - @ < 9 = ron c3 — a @ as) © °o 3 Ds ais ce ~? St s ¢ ce wo c Ga © ° —s = ~ wn + 3 © ‘ se ~~” oO > - Cc cm u2 <c 02 oS x Ss ws so Ss > 2 © » ~ r x & rm | 4 ci ce ot m4 My & ea °o a epee + GS a - a. 6 oS we 2 © a oe oe Oo ws Ss i c est r ¢ ® Ay S - + 3 oO s - AD o A Oo = c =. Sea : ° ¢ ~ cS wa 52 Oo me Aa > © a c ie £3 a + 2 o “ c © . 5 o S Lp - E cs 5 c + <= O »~ AD ~~ ee S ~> a3 2 E > 2 1 + + + 3 he 3 M4 ai oO © pt ~ roe < . oer - = ot ww - ci cant ® » a oe . Paes =. a = ; - = = 4 © s t + as ; = 1 ho + = . cS oO Oo = rc ia fo dt i ct - 7 - e a Ss Ua te MR Q ~~ cs ee < PF + m6 4 Pe SD rt « i wt & ° . . 2 5 . ; + ea Sng ° oa : - + = SS - + > : a +4 Be e 3 cw a = = . : : ~ “ 2 ° ha ° o> <-s «& = 40 O i S- » “¢ ‘ +s rio : t co =F O Q h & & Ee — in + — o2 w2 - C + | * ~ C ~ oO SS Ss 2 2 Oo C ‘ rc ~ ~ . ~ * i ~~ o G2 oe co , ws O ~ - ¢,. ~ .. ca aw - “cm > © Ss cc +4 , 5 . - 4 ¢ ’ = ‘ = i r ae ~ = i 3 t - oS rc go us ° sg ud . SS rt ¢ g o SS Oo GS ® oa _ 3 ol . 3 wn ri cl o Oo _ c= . ; °r ? > c . t : ns ee » . SS oo oe 7 =o & “ © “2 oe eS 4 a <? _ je Se oe ‘ ww u . $ “S$ S . 4 + ke < a & “ as ¥ ¢ — > ww > O ot ) . v <4 cs ca S a rs co. oS rt aad pe “2 +2 oO ° a od . > - ers oP My ro] . “cm 3 ; a @ a o vd ° 3 Ss - 2 : a es 6 = so <«¢ «@ — = : a pes ae + me - ie 7 > Ss ~ re oy © Oo xo) Ss ‘ oO ‘i ' C S C 3 3 “W b wh 3 *) : a ~ 2 e > — C 2 c oO * Ss r3 . ro) 5 = — . ~ ~ Ec v © G3 a > m7 Zz tid C: 2 ~ ° : — © 2 = s Q on = a rs 2 t oil - of r an y Fs ci a . — = ~~ © a 3 bi rc > . <> G2 + z ran by ri Bh 3 u) 2 ri ae + _ 3 be Q ct . we tS oj m by S G3 £4 x oS bh ae x mH we 3 A ee ma oh oe Hh ee tc ; he .: ° ¢ Ag % © oO — rod . 2 ° oD ‘ oat - 4 . — So S 3 v . a ri > Oo | +2 © = 7 > C °r r ae) < S ! a +r <3 - . re & 4 c - ‘ ~ cy . a ; ; - ; Oo > se a7 O a © rt ~ = S roe > “mh 3 o. S © E; +? £: . : ar) 0) 3 €) Q> c CG 6 5 by Re ct c r - rs r~ + oO Po - = ’ ee rs = y pas ? ” uy i ~ d. + w c : wa . co _ ; » ci +2 i 42 , . 0° s ~ - 3 2 m4 D + £ J B + oe Pe <3 rey < © oat Be , i ee + 2 = 3 ak’ ee ee r n : C C E 0 rt OS q ~ + o oO © © z J x m= z c r a G “ C x as C5 - ae 3 Ro cc - + os ww + od 4 : c . < wa ve i 43 ~ r + 7 er? ws Gi =, cr * r é 4 4 7 . rc ci . © ® + oe - — ov . . ‘ ~~ Ha - a ~ _ S ve De a 3 +? t 4 ti . © > &S S TS ~ i Se > - ro Y C3 © ‘ £ on . . fA rm > a > S S 2 © A + + ¢ x r cf See < ° 33 o <2 5 0 £ ; ~ a r : e - : cy 7 o2 f J . S £ 3 + 4 + + ya) r> © +> ‘ o3 x < * f4 c + +> oS . = C O ¢ G2 * +? —_ — aan -_ + . “f > o . sb 2 > 3 a : ; . 7 i ner r) ‘ Be c4 by a . rc - st — —~ oO Try 39) 2 X ° ~- x = S c 5 7 3 ‘ e ° 42 oS ! 3 <3 ~ ot C ° > - 3 + Oo c i c nm ~ = > ; Cc : - + SS 5 G - <9) © . © + i. ‘ < + > o e 3 - 2 . c a: = c ; Q Q C + rs + 6) + +e c C a +: C t © - ~ i ‘ > . : S M4 7 _ ® : r=) 42 3 ‘ST ¢ S ort > a z 4 Q ; c © 2) + ‘ 3 . 5 M4 , a © ? 2 ~ . wo a 3 t . - 4 “= ~ a = followi:z v ee ee } aerea Fy - » > S4 — 4a ¥ ; ® 4 N = © t oS se > 4 » +> + wl - , od - a 2 “3 % > ~ ~ = 4 % 2 oS » - ; oS me D > ~ > : D 4 4 4 - fy oO > : » 3 > “ 3 J DB v . 4 > ‘ b > - . » 4 3 + ~ ~ t. + > 3 > + 3 4 i s < 3 4 ww - é - : Sa - <2 - 5 é 7 2» vB “+ ; Js 4 : 2 ae é 4 _ ‘ ‘ > 4 rt - ‘ ~ 7 - - + o . 2 3 : 2 4 Db . - - ) £2 3 ~ o ¢ > ; : ~ : a - L cE 3 $ $4 ~ 5 . « £ D D -~ - D ° - : > = ~ 4 4 = 32 : - 3 2 2 5 - =f > « a4 4 : > -~ oy 7 oS ty > 4 a : 5 S - A TCR o ———— para oes - ee ee — = — = a “ a o— —< 9 = _ ~ @ Co 3d Co i 5 t, i >: eS ~< oO mt . o 2 - a oS si 3 oa 4 vo 3 "| * 2 4 <2 oa 4 » a wv hy D > v cic +. : “ + ; oI 4 > t- v od “ae ea. & Seiten ee Faas er Same derec U ee “ ™ * len pe - ne ore oo a Se i sonar = — be » “ ieqd deiettaatt ra eet = aere vu + —_ Dar et weld ages UNM Riahan Sharks <-—1a oneal Sea + v verdic a oe 5./orn Selipeoeae ' > oi oD 3 ° cage i imp if Be ~ naQatl o » and 00K UG , Clar ae + ta < » ~» oS - 3 a + ) D < 2 Oo “4 2 2 vb | 4 C ~ > ——— a a ICU e/ 2 "Qea Je -@1i) ride. Cc + Abs, avid Fox, d t not a a Z amen == = 7 —— - ee cemee ae eae a ee _ a see es - - ; 4 os ci 7 v . . aud _~ af $ vb oS 3 % Bs - i ai x > So + se et 2 <> > > > »> S Pas os : + £, ew vU re. 2 > ww : c 2 ti 2 » ry oS co o + o . 2 4 et 3 @ + $ ® 3 xa So rr ® -4 : - £ : ; 2 a an a a ne - eCQauct @G > 4 ° < - ani ‘ ic - a hoa > ~4 = * . . «? © ‘ 2 Db 3 s .Cd a Tina Lea » aed. o1 AQ wiv AX 8A v La a a oS on 3 3 S . v o - L cs L S Le | = » ‘ + 7 a a ~ a S 1 > , »D > be > ; oO o 4 Lv —“ ha > x inl ; : : - sat 2. +s 3 » } ; 5 a : > cS Be e : f - 9) 7 : fa — ¢ > < 4 oO Oo > : : 7 eS M4 © = dD ; al 4 D $4 oO C — 2 ws 3 : : | > oO | > oO > ~ ‘ : c = GB re) Se g- ® ; v w : , & Sa - Se ' : ri D cx @ ; : Tc ‘ J2 42 : | ° Sa i oO a « 4 Y : : i 4 ; ; | : 4 p cS Gi > < rt o rn ; Be | : +9 ® co | > - ; . > -? @ t 7 ; L ~ — C 3 : | : — = | . i > - 7 : 23 e ~4 i ; o ; i “ot 2 a : : 4 — ; : | $4 : : ‘ < : oo | : $ 2 a‘ é . " ; ® » . | . ‘ ‘ < ‘ - ,; & =a > ®» * : Mt es ™ “4 cS ™» é ; W ~ i NSAI 2 ; “A ‘ : ~~ ? r SN = = ; & 7 ‘ , ‘ " ~ - a — e~ et = RN NS OIE ON me a x + » a eat => 4a cs —~4 $ otk » ‘ D> » » ® YD » < > a » ~~ » “4 Dv — > wa »D ol © c @ c. » o wa 4 » $4 ’ ft ~ oO oO mr rs 3 , “ Jed tl 0 uea oh! TY ie es pote Lr cepa ee ee os agen en eg en a ih A LET : “2 t ? > 3 Oo 4 Oo a 3 ; ag » ‘ ) ; Ke 1os C ; % . +> 3 : 4 — ‘ . 4 » < > “ 4 ‘ . - Oh) > c 4 4 ? v4 ‘ Pal es > . ~ 4 ° > dH + Be ; : - 4 a4 } ; 42 ~4 ; 2 . - ® 4 é s 5 ct Ss i: is ' - B ; : e 4 So 3 ry a Dd So ss ) > ‘ $ > ha + : ; 3 : z ~ : -~@ ® 4 ) © ° oS Ho > : v ae ) : ae 4 $4 Ss ) a ‘ . 4 } 3 £0 UD c 5 > aed cS ; 5 Dv : ~ > Ny : + : > “oO 2 ° - > = ss380 4 . t > i - : : - ¢ > : ay ae: - = a . v oe . oS 5 “ = ‘ . a@®M t% QQ CO + , ‘ : : ) = cy c a 4 Ja 3 > : : = ae 2 ° . ; = 7 : : ° > 4 & 3 = : = : — « 3 i i oar ce i 7 ¢ ™ > i =e $4 > UO iw 4 led >» anil 4 Z 1 e s mgs € e P : 4 ‘ 4 x + _— j . : c » a < # ; . P ; 3 C4 > ; i. 3 » D e oe a re) 9 . v £ ' > ° oO ; : ae > 4 4 < 2 “ ¢ + ~ 2 3 4 D4 ® se 1 > —j 32 . 5 ’ i . v2 ~ ~ m4 = -> 2 40 3 £ ‘ 5 : 2 > O -e4 ow - 4 ” 3 - we a > ia & . 4 & o x > t ow . > > 2 - eng oO — g — Se £< £ 2 4 oO = ot 3 a2 2 + gow, o $ - : > . 3 5 2 se 2 “ - : . 3 a fs 2 4 _ 2¢ > a ¢ 2S s 3 <3 4 ' 4 : > Sa 3 - ‘ a ¢ he > <> - ° re) © » 4 ry ‘ —s 4 . .. > » : > : t ” c aQ - $ - i oO » 4 4 ~ rs OD ~*~ +4 a + = bs 7?) . 4 -~ | ‘ : “ “ . ~ . = o » v oO > £ ‘ r4 * 2 Dv 2 Y ‘ | 3 » . as f Ry aug Be 3 “ » » @ -~ 4 3 a De a “4 : : ts Cf t ft. , r = “3 : = “. ° ® = ° 4 3 t& 5 ; « Oo «a > ; rq . . Ss e-r4 of . ad a Dp ‘ e 1 » od < + 1a, Caroli! h . ° 4 > ' ‘ ' ~ * . . 2 c <; ~ be 3 3 . . = ’ . . 4 ? - + . sid + , . ¢ «ha . 6 r 3 ua + . 3 ‘ 2 2 tt ov ‘ e B 42 “ . : v- Cn, ® - ~ ' % is ¢ . e - : oO E + “4 : $ > O° c m > > — 3 ei * — rt <> on > G4 ° Be 4 2 - <3 7 2 > vi r > wa ‘ : 3 ea. ¢ i o P > - . - x et 7 3 + ; ~ f ~v > 4 . . © 7 * > > * . > + ‘ e . ft 7 . ” ~ & t - + 7 ¢ - - , c ¢ Lv ’ + ‘ ~ oe , - € 2 +? = 4 > q g ‘ ° ¥ + ‘ “4 c r Sa , he ‘ ~ ¢ * ) w w 2 4 ‘ ~ . . “ r ' e 2 ‘ Me o> ~ - : + a | oS F 3 - 3 rc 7 G : 3 P fj <9 | f . 5 ® 4 ' . a ~ + ’ ~ 4 * 4 Gq > - ct ¢ ’ is a v ces ce x- + ~ : rad 2 4 ca ©) 4 © - vo) 4 @ o2 3 c “2 & ' ° . Pd ¢ et ; + 4 4 ica rc 7’ ~ ‘ 4 ' 42 ‘ ' + + “ 32 am sad + = : 42 - : « S r~ + 2 2 s - po : Sw re re a? ne o 4? c2 os 2 Ses en ae ° v 3 ‘or JOC, asa? Mid ( |) +7 oa) dere t \+ 4 sr . nerebdy ’ nrovided hove ° ‘ Saad ‘ ckery Jr Kw MUG a d an 10one 4. u Ain -« i oh omn a U der hereun n&S 2 A 4 A { proces . He Justice. ned) + Y) rio, Lid did G D b Gu £ PL es Cue = tern a Re - er vey re nereb we abo ve nNrovi € $4, Nderent as esaid 4 ¥ I= ¢ ry a7 aan boc ~ A 7? ated. ire yve a Av! ‘ ‘ ecree a 4 ler ne nrocecdings heret ct o «r+ h 4 renvnort ” 1 ort Judgmen en ean iiet LOLs, he "9 . “ : i - 2 : ; - ~ ° a » ee — : 4 ‘ ‘ - w 4 we ot o -~ - * = : t « Rr ~< ial te . c be a - é ve ‘ . o~< - ~- 3 = C : 3 = = re > =} . ! a = ~ = © ~ 4 & > : ‘ , : r 3 a ¢ a = * Y - = > 6 ; oor +“ © - ° © a : 2 om 7 é o > 4. ¢ ~ r $ ad t ~ cS 2 © = . 2 - . . eo S Ee © Ss a e 2 = n - Foal a MS © ~ C & ‘ is b $ & 3 @ © © aa. Q . 8 2 w : ' t ee eo es > + . . c co eq e Pe ve ty - oc + + < - - : rc om e o _ ~ oo 2 ae $ + oy . b ‘ 4 = , = a4 “4 oo 8B : a = ‘ t . ~ ra - C2 be oo ; : ' + ~ ‘ : ; q 3 ad 5 © = = : & - . = 2 cod . ~ P ‘ “3 4 - “ x . by © c 3 e \ > i; = avd oe < & - - + - ~ . > = ~ rt Sa te cS ghe ~~ re = = - e 4 a : ‘ ~ “ He - om ~ r = = 7 . ? cS 5 t + ’ oO 2 & > 4 t é 4 > ¢ 4 * . °) : | . : t 2 . ~ ~ - . 2 © o 0 ‘ ; t > - 3 & - = t ° rs be & = © ye be L ~ t CO " . 4 - , o s = ° o s 4 e C oe £ + © c — - cc age — ’ : i ae : oe 4 “ = tee oe ey _ : = . ; r + + . r « g a2 mt 4 = ; . " A o ; _— . 7 * a2 = > é ~ - . t C2 cq + > = . c " “ o ° Bs e t rot ° @ < @ £4 ; : © = é ' : - . ’ b > + © — &, a S +e mg ‘ c co ms , 3 3 C : Db ~ ; : < + a T t ‘ @ —* % al + 4 8 2 . t =" ~ cs és & a + @¢ > ; é - < ; = ot . 2 > 4 : G e- * . r4 Phog 2 es . - 4 t e oe 7 is oe es we on ae ae : 4 =. & eo ; > oe we : 43 : 3 : t Oo re & a ” a nd so = . ae am pe ¢ e + 9 £ © > & > q ra . co ae Ss 3 a b &. S os 2 a é- : > + m . a r> r r> } o2 Q a co + eas ; i) ss + : 4 ~ — c S « “3 > vt “4 i=) + a he wo O = os ° + = wa > at ° 5 - $3 cS . . rg : : < “yg i e 4 o + f : : - « > r a ; + a] 2 c a 3 2 z = ~ 8 s nm Oo as eS <« r ‘ * r , ma : c a eG a 3 S ~ . o ‘ ae : : > ; = ; 4 i . ° ve’ 4 = so +» o = Ss > : + “ 3 +2 “ 2 : ‘ - : ; r > , 4 a E ~- ° £ : Me a ' 4 > © ; 3 al - +2 +? rd oO ' > G4 e + ey s) ; cs “ G4 s us vt 2 69 o i a? <— r a t oO e ca oS . . +s ‘ Pe - - rd - ° o> z Q + ort eq ‘i 2 org 3 4? : = f ‘ ° ; ; > oF a o 4 r _ ¢ J G be . . © + ¢ _- oe ; y +. ; pe gad ¢ G _ e : : “ e " . r ‘ : - = “ < ks r- < © . . — 2 . . e o S 2 ~ : ~ <> a > rt . - > . + ‘ < > t rt & is e bd . ’ * * + © —4 7 4 oO ‘ ‘ ~ > ~ < - —_ “3 ~~, 2 @ . ‘ +? * & > 2 £ o ri Ss ra . + es + - 2 a > or by €-4 2 ° * . ‘ 2 - 2 a . =3 5 & ? % . © a ' . 9 - & Fr . - + - © <6 > =a bs o + . ~ = _ ia + . < + c ; Yo — ’ 2 ” -% ; F 3 : sis a Z ' 5 . . , 2 ‘ S C r ! . 42 by = 5 oe - C> c ve be 3 + ~ ‘a . * a » “a ° = a A = t t om 2 5 os 2 o e - ¢ a i = ~ S a =~ c ™ 7? r . ~ ~ ad -_ Y et “ ° 2 “ e } 2 = i + + e- . > 2 ~~ c t a= cc r 7 7 e 7 * ~ - i ~ . - 2 7 . o rp - - “a ‘ = . r ‘ me = q- t4 cs ~ < % . 4 ‘ c ‘ S i 6 © ba ; . ‘ ; ‘ “ < 4 € » . ” C . ’ : : e : ‘ t - ting, itty, a, ey ey = — ae = a a ges ia W an In the Snvrerior “+t ‘ 1 | a ae , ‘ 4 vs ( iy fi jorth Carolin j Ootober Term.19ll, Iredell County , int: 1 vorrov and ¢ the: s { be wu . t therefore ) ered und ar nm that JUDG! : r r > 4 3 “—"" e , ‘ ) if ‘ far Urleé i roe CC 4 sand Pye I wn Sloan and others. : i 100 Jolla ‘t) terest on 1.00 eae \ ‘ 4 * os + , . L Li, A nur mntil paid, i i ntere t on This cause coming on to be hear { { fog , 1 . ‘ a, Lh ay t) rte ix per ent er annum ‘ennty before his Honor M.H. Justice. .« e : 4 ‘ ered d lred 4 if 1s tiffs { sald VOouUnLY 7 ‘ a ’ ’ ward upon the rerort of the commissioner he: etof t 4 . 1 t 1 E uK ion v f tare a the ; of the vands menticned «and described in the nleint, P George B. Nicn Nn, commissioner, expos: tne § ! 44n P e tle Justice, ae the court houre door in Statesville, “Ce alt 2 "Ce Sept. 4th, 191], 1 r re George A. Gril ghest bidde2 s i nds at the ! T 90,650.00, And it turthey ! ng that no ad been filed to 1 of said commis nex { Wand that 1 : id se Tai;yr and re OY Qs U & ti ra aai4 } ‘ aq, ad, i ! i us vourt that ca hereby ir { ry y a - I A 4 ‘ Geox B. ay ‘ I n, J I k exeente ‘ 4 ; Ke, execut r ver t ie pur ser deed c ds UPON Line nv {f the purchase pr ec wViiien 0 the payment ; eee , ; Payment > Judgment and cost in this action. oil, Justice, Jude 3 . Tort Us linge | In the UNeri or vo rt 4Tede]} °11 County I ci ice Bile es overiber Te gadile v.] a " ° sarris T ry m 5 reverse BCRGGIlY ond J.B, i layhow : JW, trading ie Hawwd ot i ee [ © 48 Harris & Mclleely Co. “Vee .7 j OKKDiN. Meu, hOlland { Rho . " : ‘ o4 . nn f t vee8 Cauce coming on to be heurd and it appearing that an hate vu) +4 7” Sntitled laryvdie 5 x ae vas brought this ¢ wert iS @ wehbeely Co., vs Sed. Holland was broug! to 4 veorm of th , = 0 Ene : : . : i 4 . 3 is court and thet a writ of claim and delivery was issued + UY the “~ POS8egs j : fsdnvit eB ©10n of certain property described in the affidavit and it *) “Tther apne , 4 “Ting that a good und sufficient bond hae be n filed for the action ac.ording to the ctatute and it further appearing summons and the writ of clair and delivery the Clerk eagle, =~ een Se a 7 na 0 irt 1 + Surveyor surve © - 2 ~ 4 + C > . ~ ~ MH r . ? - C m4 f ° od ? > - - vr +2 o ri. hy yo - 3 . ey Ae hy 5: ° C o) > . . = tla ba . ony : : ; : SS Ps . cs ro : > S er r ™ > c ? + ; c ~~. + oa SS bs 2 2 Ga ix : <a . > C + + ~ , > ss - 4 3 2 . a) }- c +? - he Cc GS : 3 . ; » > + : : aol f ra 44 ' c - or ° ~ - 4 ro ct > ‘ t i > o -? = G t o S © - e > Hy > S 7. ~ Oc . A oO ~y ra > € ie . ° c ct + co A - er hy os cS 2 c . b+ 4 + 42 Po he rai © +? S 4 ‘ . re . % be © 4 c 2 23 S e;) +? d > ~ ‘ ~- Sa SS . S 3 J — “oe ~ = ~ : y ‘ — a rs G4 + +> $ $ C 7 ‘ + 3 + " 2 > - cS ~ i 2 S a” - % 2 : + + o Ga - r 2 e S _ i : S ¢ ss + 1 & we) ' r Co S © . a mo m : - er C) + o “oer i ¢ i eee 5 - + ox o ¢ as i 2 . ‘ ~ C : re + i. by . ort EX csc < a - o < ~ cy *2 ‘ mee — — © ~s i . Lo ~ 3 ~ 7 - Q 7 “ <x - . ty S ‘ © 4 oC wo ° & h 4 ) . > 2 a pod 2 6 : : | ¢ > & - a ae Ge Am @ 2 8 &. > gs + ° he ¢ um ¢ » 3 ot Os : fe. ¢ So £ > 2 u 3 , . rc © c = 3 r s na ie > = Pe ~ Oo cs : s c ‘ © ws r S © ~ cs >> © C2 + S + ae +? + . . ~ ron) ra > = = “ 2. 9 st : 2 .. -*. 2. 8 2 c 3 ' <® - rd ct rc i > : ; o 1 Ca cd “ © - 4 : me cI — 2 ¢ 7 cS ~ ) * + + - 4 ~ rey - ca - rm Sa C = ¢ S h ¢ . : Se S — = _ 7 + = ~ 3 C oo 4 S = ~ fo) U x rt ~ © oe ° 2 2 cS ssi b. + + c a a ‘ . - t cy 5 ‘ Me _ © ci a ~ - 2 ‘ cc ‘ — oe S >> . . te + ¢ _ > +? e ¢ C - - 7 ‘ : c - - = - - ey cad — 2 43 Q " 2 2} 2 ¢ ) : 1 ‘ c3 hy 2 . = ; > . rm re ~ - 2 . ms ww “ . U2 bees — . $ * o 3 4 ~ c c a , £ E Be =e : : : 0 9 © > ™ : . ‘ ~ 4 =~ 3 O p > © - + ) - » - as + - . _ , ; 4 oO ~ i. “r r + ~~ | 2) ~ >) - hy cs is . = ‘ s . : . : ~ a2 ieee . < ‘ ; = a - " ., * ¢ - ~ 3 - _ v= he c a C 2 é. al » + ~ - ¢ rq 2 . ~< > x > 6 ’ a We es ci © we > ~~ a > i r G2 3 - £ . + , . 3 t 7 x o & es _ co u2 a oO os + o v3 4 + 3 rt et et rt he = “ oO ea © ~ S a ~ oO - s Oo > ° 3 > ~ © =| > < <= Ge > a SS a . ® © » cc “_ SS “J G2 = ‘ ri = o i © re pa = 33 + 4 © Ss « ' > Ms +? an) < mo ss E cS s3 r= Oo oO S co b cs ~ @Q . an | ct <3 3 oso ri 3 > oO + co a Oo Oo Oo tt rt wr ~~ 7 Pe wo ro c3 cs rm by r. 3 °o ° oO oO c a] » st +4 > Ss by > o © oc S Ss “ns © C oO 3 + < =] © a oe wad oT ® ay <1} © 2 3 +2 3s ‘ 3 os 3 A 3 © ct Ss oo) Pat ¢ +2 o wR Ww f b ms a a 2 2 > r oa A a Oo 2 eo @ 2 a @ + «2 ca +? = oOo > oO Oo rm eet a SH 4 - o~t — pS = 2 “4 Oo Ss by ~* M an) <t as 4 ‘ oO “ ® = 4 Fi ° 2 - re owt he Pa 4 = 2 ra Me c o <3 eo y c c o > +? ws en-4 a te @ o nee a3 ‘ c c ‘ « s E3 a cs ” Be ce o2 o t+ = 4 > o @ c > < « 7 7 ct @ 2 -_ sz oO Be > <j 3 ms -< 2 + 2 2 é at + + ¢ +> ct “> =| " — “rt <3 © a © +> <; bs oO <> + H r ; cS © of nm rc + ct = iO - ' — . oe ‘ i © cj ©> < & ? nD he 2 4 © “ ‘ 3 @ 33 c > = => ts io o3 € w s a 3 i mm * a oO bh 4 ‘ po t, * aa ~ ua 0 3s 2 mi 3 . ‘ : C r * C <2 7 3 au) = i S, . el oH . fe < ‘ i 2 © - = S a C 4 “ 4 ce C v 4 . - - S GS a e ‘ ~ Q @ f 4 s ‘ C ~ é = ~ ~ ¢ > s ‘ , E “ - > be C a 7 Js : : 2 > ‘ ci D wH oO E S ag > . he 3 » ‘ ~ <2 2 . 4 : 3 = S, > few! = 5 > cs . ci ot. 2 “r ” = - * - ie - . 2 > < - a — o Pe 2 a - +) = “2 . q I oO +2 r- ~ ~- > Ga ~~ ° 5 ‘ — 3 3 3 OQ c Qo > + 4 ™ S 7 . oS 3 Tc ~ c +2 we . Oo i + . ) 4 £ - a = *4 > al ri 3 © aa c ¢ © e > ») 4 > c> { 2 E. = ri +» ° > oR 42 3 > S. oO i +? ¢ 7 bes ¢ 3 o ie ~~ fe} 4 “2 c or 2 . 4 7 > c My 0 © D } = c mal > g ~. r a as e My ci Se - Cc ho 42 oO 4 sor = rc c. a co = - e 2 a . : 2 S 5 ¢ = te ~ a: ~ re ~ + £ > : rs Ss © Se Q © c “oe a eS ) a : ._ : os Eg : — 2s 6 oh o th “ 2 7 ° o 3 ¢ G4 C © wn z : . c SH Gs 2 a cS 2 ° ° ¢ . co £ 3 i = a ow * 0 oO wf ti > © Oo fe ae .- es eee . ° 4 S ; 4 “ th, 2 st + hh eS ba © 7 - - - > wd $ ee" - , a c C © c ¢ . r coy c eae 2 Mi 2 - ae 5 - + eae ae C + = 2 Oe ee Oe ee oe, ee a 2 ‘ 5 5 it ie - ) ° > ‘ re] re : i by =) ~ c +? ent < + © <= 3 ° : — i ¢ f “C1 rr > C ° < + - - C 3 ~ S : Cs ad © Se a) 3 ¢ = rs x = g $ 3 ¢ cs o he co) = 3 ts 3 > : + ~ <= e . E J > m4 be 4 C rm t Oo 42 cS 2 3 co ort ¢) - 3 0 > c o Oo 3 a > ae ae + @ 3 i ° - 4 a) ‘ £ 63 3 C Cc i 4 i t. t - ¢ g G+ 3 cs C ¢ “ i rc . i > a a - - . rs - © b« oO = O r> re ci be ‘ S) r ad a t ; " ¢ > o 72 © Ag =e S a a ¢ . ee 2 + =o o + i ' CS é ~ _ 2 ~ hy > 2 QO c + be sol a S ~ A 2} he os oie o ‘. 3 ~ . ~- = d . - r-i = 5 Q) E -_ ‘ ‘ . > +4 ft. b+ : > G . ¢ ; ¢ ZO re c c e re 4+ a 4? © : eo ® e > r ‘ ?* 4 » cad o ~* +? + e~ ce ‘. c 3 = st hu “4 C a 3 + x . re + : > , t . ° + = G Ba = “es 2 = os 3 r - ‘ = 2 e + a : c ont ‘ ¢ 0 3 ¢ Oo | ? a * . Ss by > § +? © 5 oy +? ~ - es + 3 > ( ‘ a see } . +4 r *t + 5 $ C © - - w a é “ c - g r v2 ° » - : = > v- = ¢ Py + C 4 4 C + 4 be eet o g .. ; = - Fa. . J = ae 5 . +? So a c C : ; : E4 . f ~ ~ Le ; a . ; : ; . . - - . 5 : r + os C3 s 3 ‘ b +? © » . C ; r +2 oe ° o5 E c e wo S $ 4 2 4 : a a ¢ ‘ 3 . 7 C 4 * a S - cS ‘ ‘ c3 4 MM © : c + . oO ¢C - ¢ oS > > C © n = e : ‘ { 4 ~ oe Cs —_ : Cc : os - S = ' + « f4 © : > - c + ¢ x ee bs E : re : O ‘ = > - £ + c st . + } 4 : + : Tae S a 2 +? ~ ‘ 4 a 7 . 5 c . 3 oO +4 cS ~ =) 4 mM 3 3 ° 2 + < rt c North Carolina | In the Sunerior yourt bounds the loan: jin auo a@na marcs nik report at the next t yrr f this Court Iredell] County i lov. 19113. 7 Tn anid survey the seme to be done according to the econ é wc 4 \ v vertices. Iredel] Lumber Vompany, The { ia A PRR, TAR Ae im tv 7 eOonsean 2) ; \v ; hs 4 The cause is continued by mutual consent until next term of tii. J.7. All‘son, Mrs. L.5. Allison I pprariou Fo: 4 PaeLallOW FoR arvOolUTHE ) a9 Sou The expen C Vtiy by the perties to J.u. Adams, Ex Parte I ’ om ‘7 -* r y . : ° : rr 4 . * SoG aT ay His Honor M.H. Justice, holding Court for lrede Nasa aes Judge Presiding, fo His i : Rr LL ee en er eae | ” , + &4 2 . hn he {! The above named netitione::s show the Court: ( i lorth Usny T4 we i Tr the Su 4 y m -/* * + ta ~t whe - > 4 sihe ° ° . } . 7 7 s - ' 4n the ouperior Court lst-- That the Iredell] Iumber Company is & cornoretion duiv a i " = 4 \ 4 VJ ta AMG ; . hh Tw 7 as ‘ 4- wy , 2 Iredell munty { Cetobor rr + - ee a kins pe 7 pee Hi vad Ve VOUODCT +Clrl 1.191 a“ organize ana existi n¢ ur dey the ows ] t ié St ate - : ¢ rth “oro aT 1 ae | A | \ : s 4 2 . rrt nes . DLs » . 240 + ; Howe * lina, with ité prs Ne inal OTIi¢Cce at Stetesyvi e ire t { 9 "a 6 ; _* \, ee C- lerns ‘y i { } s aronlinn ; : +h 8 ee , : ; : ’ Nort wiil L1na, ana UM & b O¢ 1eT $ or 4 y - { , . Lov ‘ j 7 14 ‘oa : a . SrG@ atts A s280f, kid eo . ° LJlison nG es ° i s t nu YT Me A : ’ {adi P = "A . - 1st { JU UG dil Ol snares of the par value of ne i irer jig: : ie ’ , + ' 9 Vie a : - ; ; ‘ 20 ' by them being as follows: eta ek sor é ° ee 7 * ¥ ws , ha 3 7] . * . fis 2 fh Hrs. tis BiareOn I1¥e (5) Bheres: 0.15. A ty N | ° j , ' \ ; . 4 4 4 . al + 7 . : > ne | j ’ 42148 6 £ n oe nes et i $ te2 | the Sunerior nat dg... Allison »urS. se Allisor Velie A i i 4 4 t UJ iF | w rE O7 i ag 17 ,OnRNnLY Pb 4 Wee TY ray Ton Tnetdian ‘ ie can oes dire 4 f enta ~. i“ 2 : 4 ‘ . a . i * an " aC y 1 ) rad -Ono? ee sustice, dudire reBlding, Af : 1 23a cornroart B, 800 taaet Wi. ALLIGOn 28. pres t 4 % a) na n ef i r } a f 7 + r 2s 2Amrn4 acs oe ee Pin am os ~ 2 ta Mrs nw Ay14 rear “ eed ’ . : 0&2 upon vi report of the commissioner heretofore arvo‘nted MES. wee Allison ,vice-presid nt, ana deitj Adams Secret: ij 20rnoration. t Lint That said corporation is largely indebts v 14eawenla +r } hs oo} .+ £4 AAawe + he Canrt Parties 1 thea enm ? "try £3 yy n45 1 in ’ 4 ‘ a 1 i® $a1e@ to the nignest bidder at tne Voure i ¥i€S in the sum i Lorvy ve nunar Liars : ne eeevs ; dey of vVetober, 1911, after due ’ e ’ , ’ re - ; 7 ; r ody — yntw an °° . ‘ 2 f Bing 1 vounty on .onday the 2nd nd it u. ther Swe ; . ; eae sacs me th lemen : : ss LU au. ther enpearing to the Court that the said Commissicner et the demends made urcn it . . + , sale in the o fiee of the Clerk of the Superior ‘curt pended na ee e oC OQ ‘= co 44 sate ss) eRe ie eee cette! dus eraanery OUEI1 NESE icr Want debt pr ; ie ; ee ee ee ‘fore considered and sdjudged by the Jourt the the 7 née said gal ha s 4 * . "S an 1 ys 1 th . . Sulcs be und they are hereby in al] respects confirmed end 1% ble dig trit $4 ; os ve al ~ . ‘> Aiwa we “tribution among the creditors of the Iredell Lumber Company. 1sei-ner is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to mare » ¥ " ‘ + fi ¥ ri t Where your petitione:s pray the Court to avvoint some ‘nd deliver to the purchaser a deed in fee simple for seid lends S é i Suitubd} > narwe : j : C "“8iC person recetver to tale churge of caid propery ana collect UNon Pfayment at the et 4-4 fit . , 1G urcnase money and every nert thereof. ‘Ne debte i : nA ne on d ve SOUS and sell the other pro perty of said cor] oration ana ray - tT + iL -elle Justice, oft Said debts Judge Presiding. J.B. Armfield, Attorney for Petitioners. 373 deceit one ad , dniy swo 1 ») ses nda Qn we .- ‘. i 5 x os 2 sie . ‘ being duly sworn deposes and sas that the forrons rene shell give notice to the creditors of the Iredell Lumber -BOlng Said receiver & : (tind Ve ay f his o1 wledge except es to those mater: petit on ¢ STU 4 nis own novi ié &e “e ’ Aw \ nose Mawtrcer: ana hine . 4 raeak tor "asa ipnaAve fy +¢hoa Te.nAaAmoaory » i things oy publishing es notice? once a week for fo feovs in the Lend k: inf ti i belief, and as to those tic company lle ged ir ‘mation ¢& pliei a 2 >) those mattere and : é a Cae aa aka is : g3llegeaq on information and Dé Gi, Sv Cnose mer TE and things ne plished at Statesville, 40 pre.ent their eluime to se: \ recoiver, . newspaper pu nee believes it to be Crue. " ‘ P ea ent tant tn ( iy ; mjitation of - ° qithin said 13 * . 4 1 £ ey. foyer hay ordere ; This causi cs retainea 102 Tur Une? )Y Tes Sworn to snd ¢cubsecribed before me Th il. ° Just Cc ‘ $- > : Inv 19173 : Un at ve : Jud ¥ an r. 191 jovenber 2, 1J11. t mers . 8u nt Aaa. A Bs V é ns t some of ome of Y t creditors, resi ae n irede) vounty,. 4 ™ \ 4 he Suneri Jorth Caroling In the superi< w . N 74 4 Iredell County OV. t3lle 3 . oe rs YY * a 2 y } > > res qing at ‘ vert er ina , . ‘a To His Honor 11.H. Justice, vuay rosiaing, Bb wey wa. ee pe Y y Iredell vount; 1 NOVe Lyi. term of Court for Lredel] vounty: 4 ~ c ; + $ ms ‘ — + 4 y ‘on 0 ” , { eC ports thet the ae i mmvyer sO OVINS os) au . . ~* ae ee a . ™ re T "> ¥ Vit au sstad Iced V . * 7son } He ; ” . esse A } ' pees it ' on the Statesv @ and Taylorsville ke ! i. OT care ne LA at ary $7A4 ; oe oan~sr e1 r ry , Tectory ouliain 1a¢ Tac en i d Or , . + 4 4 +0 Cluetasn ae 7 nih & Y y } +. ols ana Tixztvure « Gy i. 8 smn] Ou 17 Uy ° q : ‘ ” “8 4 3 <n +n + ontiece 2 + ! ‘ c 4 ca y te 4 1 mir n v¢ ard, and it appearing to tne satis ft bed material r cess £ anuf: eture t beds. l ¢ . . — +2 a . a f 4 ‘ 4 ‘a. 5 Whe — Yen ‘ ornoreation ore reesive ; s : } 4 4 rahe sy 4 ] bai . n v nh 4reae umber Yommen » & corporation t receiver is Of Opinion that the macninery, + abies \ t t 4 ¢ e ar *nroline iB 3 } ra y rea « t t « s Qo Ol 4 48 ~ 4 mataria) . ~— - ; 4 . ‘ » 7 a " FOr eS : , a“ everia@i on hind .il1] not sell to advantage fepurar bial 4 diay c ¢ \ y 1 + } t Swit ‘ r ‘ na r¢ a a Ulius ~ Wat J . v A ora Y & 165s z tn the h ‘ : , ? . ae : ea ; : pi ut vO tHe DeSt interest of the creditors of Suaia corporavivl O cCisor & 29 : he £4 ra 4 J Cr rae t n U i : ’ ( lé¢ Lo meet tne aemenas s 2M, ae 1 ‘ : jl i , ; ; t. : ; . a + 4 ~ >t say v4 ; vebuhal property for sale in connection with tne scr. . {on 4m +h ered cor C ¢ moravi : : m4 deck : peomntt nia aeobe ATMIIGLG, $4 n¢ + 4 . of 7 nr ¢ nerty said ; : * v7 a - * r " ) vu C ars Receiyv as + 4 + y+ nen ng t0 Joy ‘ } 17 n aes yer \ ‘ nvo rc ney 4 ana J dul Usal ‘ I ~ Ve Gy wits sa t 4 , * : fH36 le 8éi ¢ sourt t the s lders, directors end officers Oo 5 yy C)% i Le : 4 } « mnoOY TY Te ye] Ua via nted temnorel] s + > b Wy © 5 + wm . ° 3 ° q ol , Pate 6: : ea ent: 3 A : ‘ os a bias eS tnt Y at aid receiver shell, before ectine » It an earing to the Court that it: Will o8 « ie best + n p ro erpointment of + 1: ¢ 3 am 4) eins a ~ . » ig ea ea ila wo gtter nis poin + the eraditrr ‘ 1 t "17 ¢ . .amno ty , B6)) the n { Dy OOnad In th ul yl ge ,V00.00 ana witnin thirty days after » * Creditors of the Iredell Lumber Compeny GTO Bell sai g t dui) 1 1 1 Olea ‘ +ha estate OU? dine ne ose — id nery and 1 s 1 i a : i ~ : “an — 4 ; _ un G7 Ng ord 2° es | a ‘ a nen ( n n thie Court a full and complete inventory 0 ud » ONkine, boiler, lurber and materiai On ei. rrobable velue “8 awhole 4+ 4 ; : heretofore arroint perty and offects of said corporation, its nature and prove “9 74 "8 Uherefore ord: red that tne ree er nerevole: 7 a8 wy thia a ¥ Waa > yi) ]j = ' : ’ r ( ; » whole Bs ya0lIe ° a6 p&s OUT Ag a » «£ 7. af enta nronerty ast c VNOle @ n account of ell debts due from and to said corporation 8 ne& t cheall offer for exsle “11 of onerty ¢ 4 gg aN tic .) ot ae . sh . >on] his nr oceedi ne “tion on the noif eash on ¢ eo : : ‘ . of Nremienae o AY, , Tawdine terns yviZ: une ty can De asccitained end mate reoenort to the Superi or Court of : lises on the followin: verms, a} Tirme¢e 4 Sec: OP el *NACION of 1 “4 ‘ mreneeery UC ni Vé s a ie ‘ . - 407 I e «na an: Mee em ‘ o 7) avs thereaitec) Mure na iy at every term thereof during the continuence of his trust. nd the belance in 60 days * if DOSsneas ~ oe ‘ ao ' hai P VeRO ¢ aha : ai ‘. ~* £4¢ 70 D pe) CHa > VO Ve All cred: hei’ f to said receiver of the2y 1 on payment of first instalment, but title to roe A Creditors shull present und make proo o saja rece i « “elsined until ; ; : ¥ sALe recaiver chal ji oe of “il a1] of purchase money is paid. In care 224078 and 4 38 1 £ eo 72 f o a syeai tors Cvive ¢cluims on or before February lst, 1912, ana wll oF Pinion ¢} ; to devide ine . 44 . a mY PI ‘ors GC vi 4 nereby het it will be to the best intercet of the credito So within the tire limited shall be ane ei 8nd i n+ LA - * is a geid cor two or more lots, rized r h Ss Vicinats of d offer them for sale separately, 0° “© rarticinating in the distribution of the assets 01 and offer them 4 aut 4 “ : uC : : tea ’ Ayo £e@ BSu.u © do 80, Said receiver shal] adve:tire & a res ms s So © oa) °o —“™ hy o ce 4 3 wm ra rc o cd © MH ri irk 1H. Justice, Judge Presiding >. Landms a NN ee eansiel ea a ° a ~“< uv 33 4 - 4 os ~4 5 . 4 i cE + ~4 3 4 3 +4 > aa] y <= «< cs 3 v . - i 3 . vine ° 2 a a a +2 > 52 ~ 2 “A o + be S 4 + J - - =} Gc FA c . ‘ 4 ‘ 2 —4 2 > 2 2 c L co > » 4 fe . > 4 » am 4 - — oQ : » » 4 @ 2 » 2 ® 3 » » 2 “J + be ~ 4 > > a4 +> as 3 <> 4 3 3 ° : fs s 3 a —- 2 4 > +? 3 7 > vu c c ‘ . t 4 - 4 a4 — ‘ al 4 4 ~ 2 4 ad D 4 S, 4 ~4 ~ E > Se ~~ ** =. an v* 4 — * » x 4 sa o =) ’ ; ¢ a » > iad ‘ os = . : , . - r - < Pp Q : 4 w 3 - 4 t 2 a“ a a 2 va aren. 11 uu @ +? a 24 ASU . “cer ag — @ 2 < be e 3 3 » v4 > oO cai > oe o ? 5 ) tinued under v C018, 4 a) ea Ae er ae cine aiieajenbicaeDicecnaes nani Meni ee Sa ——————— ———————————— oe SSS = = me : ges en ee ee PR Spe SS hc ROP ear reweeng eee ae Tee oo sae prs Sa eS mes = x s = ~ - “? . =H - = as ve = cin : - oe — a —a - a $e a ee cec ling D 2 os > > a> = ' oO 4 _ =< 2 > 1 e ? 4 = ‘ 2 @ ) GLA wv 3 wad Y : . ce 5) Hy { j 2 | ' 4 4 1 o q 1 ) ja 4 4 3 3 oa 5 J > { ae ~~ 32 ‘ AAA LA Cr AQUA Rar Go ( Aw mnHnAy ULLIVa de on) 4 S 42 m4 bia Dv SS aeudl ve li redell 1 D — as a ae ane apenas ee Se alia -+ 7 S a ~< 3 oe rt © ~q oO c ~ 4 » - 7 3 c Be »> 4 .s Se . > v2 < . a « ar, 4 ay D oO c d y wd 2 wa 4+ at 7 » - : te +4 L oO 4 na “ Sa > > s s Bea > @ a7 ve ee " 1 ; 4 = 1 Pa] 4 wa . 3 » c r —~4 rt 4 ‘ 1» D 4 » ) sd + we > ? et ~ 2 - . c % at va > +2 4 2 4 e} 4 4 » re) 4 O — “ ia s = o "= CS © 3 a Oo cd > ) ; 4 > > ) - > > oS = 2 “ 4 $4 5 3 vd So D Db CS a : i a GS > ; «4 D ~ r ‘ rt 5 4 = cs 4 4 2 ® ‘ - ty - < > » re) yo + S » 2 . q t . m4 ‘ o 3 3 5 s o : a > c ) 32 ) Sa a u : 1) 4 ) +) ” “ ee | ~~ 3 Jd » > B) ra Sa 1) v2 J D ; Qo > 3 <3 D> +2 + j v 1 D 3 Ss “A ° > e c € x co ‘ 3 3 - 3 - rt So = » ® ~ > 4 ° 3 : a > > » ~ ‘ 4 > So J mf w Sy D re D Nn ere erent cre neers AR tee = Sansa teen na A AT TT oo enete Ireslal! 2 Ala <a Cy ecaay r su: hs ppcecgstis ape ) ad { ia . Y Ads e Pree ua 2 4 Ser pra ae ‘ - ‘ 5 ’ \ : ‘ ‘ 4 - 4 SS ~ é 2 1 4 + 3 4 . _ ‘ 4 ' i B ‘ ‘ ag > ) 4 . - — > 7 M4 3 4 = : S 4 4 J 4 > < > : ‘ : S . ) - ‘ . ~ ; Es ‘ ll ~ o . 4 3 > > 4 oO se : S 3 4 Co > ‘ . = > < a : > ‘ “« © © _ oa - 4 +> o th c D G u - °o fa] rt 3 = a Pe e = . $ » > 4 ree! ‘ ? e t <4 = . = 2 ‘ : C 4 cs as = = - - — $ D> 4 > > 4 Se < “4 Z + > =< a a — « - . . , 7 ee a PRS te, es Py 4 % E » as 3 ee te a e +s . es " D> “ 4 > > S ‘ 3 ‘ > et > > 4 > : > c c f 2 4 ° - = - ) 2 - a } j ’ - a . ¥ € o 4 2 - 4 - . Oo + - ° . — S ‘ Oo -{ ~ 4 ry , > i 4 ua et 4 ‘ <4 mn r= a — - < — ~«~ ; . Qo ? i 5 . 4 4 - r ; c + . ~ anf = > + 4 - 4 1 4 4 + i 4 4 4 « r 7 > *) 4 7) ~ _ - . 4 az 4 re 4 ‘ S > 2 2 : > ~ o - 7 » « + > . SS. 2a = = —— <= e eee = as : s allie te ee ee . s Seed aces be ee Rae Se er SE si PRET TE ag A = ¥ Stn ons ee ae : —— — gan Plaintiff dat aef defe ” way Sis sy) “ v 4 oS A 2 2 “~ 8 Caroli ~ +2 ts. Q — caer ae SSS ES Ee ee eng oe SRG EB RE SEG DO ° t ° ° ° . ie ee a Gate ee 7 PES ae é eee, = : e 4 2 2 ‘ ; - wd ‘ ° i ; ad . 3 2 ‘s ‘ - ? , . . . e a ‘ 4 ° . ) ? , . a . - ~~ o e + 34 ‘ € | 7 Mik Aeguns pee - ip = ae aaa we eT ge, oS Eg Resse eta ee ee Pee POMC a ee 38 4 i et om , ee ’ -- ‘ ‘ 4 > a , 4 { - ~ 4 : 2 . ‘ 3 3 o 4 2: 4 4 3 - a s t . * » “~ 4 . 3 3 , : > . n + - @ 7 aa - ‘ c ; é ~ - . ° 4 6 < { + ~ a | ) pa . . > F ¥ > , 4 ‘ > % > - 4 = a + > 3 F . > 4 2 « -~ é 3 ~ ? = . » 3 ° ; @. ~ : = . - -~ 4 « 4 ' - «~ : : 3 } ‘ si » $ Pe ss oo ~ 2 - - . » * ‘ < . 4 = , ‘ - , 2 ” - ~ * +4 , - 2 2 4 = ~ > on 2 - ” 5 ; c 2 - - . 4 ‘ . . = oes Fe res ee ” ee ee ee ene ceaee zs Sn ee a ow sr ~~? pa athetchacntpeedir eat petits octane” es i emi — er — ns a ¥) ymorro ; uv — ~ 13 ~ —— A . —" ap ieee ee eR oe eer ‘ Kan r y Lr t M 4 ~~ _ > “a : » ‘ 4 iE o - +o LS . 2 in x 4 _ a) a > ; . ’ 4 ) 3 > > 4 > > ) j - A é 4 » » 2 > . > = ~. s 2 e ” . ~~ eS x - re ie ae Pe Rie an 1 : 2 > : ‘ 4 3 : ; ° = ~_ : 4 » wd Oo : 3 ] 1 os ? ’ ft; * ~~ 2 Dv : ° - 3) : v 3 > s Z 32 ~ ° ‘i 4 S » rs ct - o + S = » +? i 2 5 5 ~ = o > o a 4 cL > 3d rity 4 —j » v > et . ey - = - y . e pad oS ~ ail . . 4 1 : > C LS ~4 2 2 > . ‘ 4 ? , i Aa E > . 4 : af _ 2 4 - D . - - . : : al > ; < < : - 4 ot iol ~ 4 So « Tr) ©) v 1 v . “5 ng pe - an = et mn 4 - i 3 > wn -é ty : ; ° o = st . oO 1 Lal lhis ne a ae ae ES Bhi Se aE x ld ES: rv that won + 4 . er _ Suet Gk aa eal * Pee LURE en Ae ee: Das igade a Sich a 8S ahd Se ae ie tat tae ae a es ane PORT ee os = as aaa ee eegeneen eee ee eae ES ES ee erg - ~uperio: . ULV: » Ae 4 vv f Tobta veToOsilia, as BE = lee Fat Fie] atta ti. =— a ee tc a i eg. 3 Sa Se ae aroiina A uw V ~~ nue Ae oe Rg ete Sete ee Be Se ST Se a aa Tc ie re cr eg ae Ea Ae BEC ig Mee 5 iy - \¢ &> eCsicin ’ +4 na, ll. Will Ha = oA i °o = o a3 > - be = t+ =s * tredell County er eter eee ‘ y) 4 Tf +waedivalil, ordered tiuat Pe) —_ av tion In . avove e + }» Via issued or the sion of ie Ul % aa the posses owed I +4 os ys by Ae seu +» vie & id lina, be rolina, Yan VOUuNn 7 o \ Vw C _ J fn, wa ‘ Ms 2 4 \? A wm Wal Ter Iredell Nor th Ire cell de SS. mL gar ee ps ae ivitlec ffs are ey ne 2 7 7 4 > ‘ 3 ‘ rt Cor bperior 1) a — County. Ceé: » + 4c €Cel ” Maid sal lel —_ eee eet wp ene? talc 8 ae I Tse nears aoeey gp gel we ore: no answ a ;i led C)1 . VOUL vb, 2 QO omplaint; Cc The term tig Justice of the jeace, W: { 4 refencant be ullowed to uve Dugenhart, nn So ™ R wer ‘endants more thun ten aujs ek complaint was duly verii+e° that % na tes hae oon f WOGe Une psaainvs is cause c be : j . ee 1° Seal, and the sum demunded is fixed b 4 + i tl f mn 0) OMpUula v-+ ascertained therefrom by com “4pable or beings Sy Gen + : ‘ oe eat for a debt secured by mortguges Ree +? eres + iv in aed Ti PIES — PE ae SE ee a SOREN PIE ae ee rr ee - ’ lin ava on Va y+} wha Was A + bs wide Viewed YU hm Othe Ssyy4 JUULIEVY © . A eid rE we thes: faz ' - oe ~ iar Pt ae GPP > - “4 we <= {———- Pend “ TN ee ROE eae us so rg re — ag er = Enter SS ———— 4 Be a °F AMR CEDPUER TE, tee CORTE TGS OE SS rs ee acerca nen eee eS a OE le @ Mille et.a ecient eee at SSS OPA Sg SEES See a ee Ee oraerea if It oii ae ee ie si? ge Se and ooamay, nm Tr eS nce eer meester Niliiade cient mero ee ee 2S PENS ances seas: VOOR WER Serres celle i BR 5 ise aN 535 Se PO = Se SF RTE: RMI TEE ee — . a ar a er PR AOE. SS age eee ia eS <== SR ee Sa — Le Sa EID Pg RE OE samen ms panes sata ad 4 o &e sidin » Pre ve Oo Jud AOS as LAI ag. eee a -—— ieee ee aw a FSS r1lilowed ASe. « COuner-c oC or orrison ve ie Petites Sm nn SE et oe ——_ = rr tren FS a as ee " ws SOBER A = aes aa “ Ol stbro v ' DS = - : is Deas aa et EE ER na rau BILE Par we D221 li AS NaALV , y Y aT, QT r 7 .'TT QD z= : WEDDING JANUANKY mY» 1933. This No. 2 etate Jumius Turner Forciable Tre spas O Lip or G ; ] v4 o + rp Goble or dered by the vourt that the flonorable © ourt meets according to ad journme a We Lefencant recorinized in t next term of this Court. y ! he . : > iat ante par Nuisance. ‘ontinuec for the defendants . A i 4 ‘ ar m+ h therspoon, of (100 each for thelr appearance av » “Freon court. Lewto; arren ' i befendant pleads guilty. rrr ea - Court is suppendeu upon the pay nent of uefendant. the [t is Raeguiredxbyx ive bond i: the su next term of tnis Plea not gull ys The following Jury; l agG, We Mie NUECONOL. Fo OD: Tilley, ry Privett, Loe Pa i he ©, le co raven, A ' icant, orrisen and B. P. Smith b ing sworn wa verdict say they find the deferdan: ull ty ourt is suspended, 6 J ihe . ie + "Z]1son Daneils, %. L. Orry, Te Fe st: Prank Ceroges, Vorris panelled for their ‘he judgment cf the £u ht and the the Court that ordered by f this acticn, cost ,POOU Plea cullty. # fine of =20 defendant pay Jury; J. R. Murdoch Ostwalt, %. C. » Johnson, randon, « OOp, RX. HH, Brown, ¥, #. ohn 2:8 sworn and empanelled for th find the defe Lty. t is ordered by the .efendant confined in ti:e com on ail of months and be assigned to work or the term of f said co Guring the term of his imprison- ‘ne followin Plea not guilty. yampbell, J. > * . . ’ else stutts ana having reretofore It is ordere¢ *) comon vail oF assigned to wors term of nis case. 134 y in this etendant heretofore guilty 3p oe of the f ti 6 Co wr t is suspended upon “ rT i the su oO née Ui baw Us He ; aa } efendant is reguirec to g.ve ® peer rerm 191 > appear nce at thi: ourt at hovem has been of good behavicr. pleads m dgment and the for Tis w that he has tment’ sndic . pill of init the cow waives Pe . The judgment The defendant px® as upon bill found. ) * the cost. the payment of tne Cc apias ana continued. ordered by the Court that tr lis term that 30 days after i ind 30 days thereafter be not tc include cases where are taken at this term by all cases where Dleaudings P oeeet be allowed plaintiff's ¢ ailowea the defends ts it. ; I B 1Vdants to Tile ans eae , : ns rders a ye de or i default, To ‘andon. J ‘ ana Onn as oda find the def the isposin:. of m counsel, comes but protestin futher with the Solicitor, and the rontendre, r payment of the rarceny. e Ggerenuant, t 4 and pleads guilty of tress; suspended not guilty. Lie itchell, . raven, Larceny. i Yilson : L, ss, 7%. Ferry, 4. f. s thy Chaney Ue As Frank Scroggs, Norris Yorrison and 3. ?. empanelled for their verdict they . eau oa y To appear and show good belavior. efendant Judgment ni ci sci fa and capias,and continusd. eing sworn encatnt r ith b e fol i Ow ing am , ana followi jury; Dell, : ‘Own empanelled lot guilty. ne ury,; Tilley, ga Ve oe ing called sworn find the defendant not guilty. ylonainger, and and failed. Vie Villiams. ‘alter : Be. We NOs 04 ‘tate VS. Tom Shoemaker Ty 4+ne ® « Waruness. animals. Lelendant called and a and caplas. failed, ste. ar yr) ] moO } g ac } fendant called and failed, Judgment 1a LDe jefendant calle: and failed. 1g ona fixed at ~i000. pias and ontinued. and continuec. ontinued as to Hol riencant requirec the su Oo} pee ae ran at tne next jt ure. ‘ontin.ed for tne defencant. ‘apias and continued. h the Judgment absolute in accordance with Judgmen r. ile ans¥e vefendant allowea 60 days in which tof ; sci fa. th the Judgment absolute in accoraance wt Judgment frostal Telegraph NO, No, o8€ State vs. lester Flow nry Gaither, VS. Harrison Coley oley T ~ oO “- 1. LOWPance He. Zo tate VS. Henry Caither. former sentence of is ordered | the mon jail of Irecell sSigned to work on t his imprisonment. Civil Calander. nO, 1] racold "oods Vs. Jal . 1s Late nMnie Twink vs. a tome Renegar ontinued. ov state and Lizzie sullough V8. Q " -€SS Weaver. Continued by consent. Ne. 2 JUOttan Wen e otton Mfg. Sales Company si vs. 4 6 ss Latesville Knitting Company. Continued by consent. Ne, 3 tatesville Lumber Company Vs. - Rankin Continued by consent. Holland Vs. iellar sontinued under former order. b according te au journmen Continued. ontinuec, sontirued lbertson ' - Bo 4 : se - Feary , Say Jurgr ‘ 4 efenda: ts \ Exr. ‘ontinued for the defendant. set ANKIT, ‘ontinued. ‘ontinued by consent. resville Cotton ‘ills Company, Inc This cause coming on to be and it appearing to the cour. tha their differences, and that the ontinued by consent. ‘ll damages crowing out of the injuries to wednesday Operator in defendant's factory; re get for [t is, therefore, ty consent of pl: f and ce an heir attorneys sebyruary 5th and all cases on rridaylIs calendar of tie nsidered and adjudged that this acticn be dism! and that the costs of this astiie byruary 3rd. taxed against the plaintiff. ite s, 1913. onday ebrugr ilson hea + Ul ageienuan 2 Oe i SEU ll of #riday's and Thursday's cases except no S« are acven ‘ y y first week @ onday eby : ‘ and rerguson f s) WAA-— attys for cefendant ee - APmfield and ‘. D. Turner Attys for the pltff. ‘onorable court takes and adjournment until 10 o54 in the Superior court ee i 1 in nn "¢ @ ) 4 ¢ North Varolina, January Term 1913. ; . a 1613, {recdell vJounty. oSurtl meets according to adjournment at ¢ S A “gple Owens NO. S7 i ae ih Vs. RK EE Na le ° mene ae ilhelm ee ad Judge H. ¥. whed anA habia VS. | So a 7 ause coming on to be heard before Judge il. YY. ‘hedbee and being heard 90. Ry. Co, ‘ue following jury o hrowntls . ree Seerr to the ‘ourt that all mattcrs in controversy have been settled out = at ae = Jury 3 eas . OG, We Fe re C : .. ’ , and it appearing to ‘ jered and adjudged that this action be dismissed sth eR PI 7a he we PELANG, -, » «tlite, r+ is there ore, orcere © : : a and eee oO ere ; : iri Va hy a as 1 , ® of vourt ca by the clerk of this Court against the plaintiff. bbah Mates Gbews bat Gacasiiae san talk *. ee oe ; i the cost taxed Dy the ee ' v"hedbee Ado : SWOrm ana empanelle or their verdict say iey ne UUS . . ws .* , mista $44 4 ‘ } ‘ He Sika vweuteins Vind the issues submittec to them as follovy } Nor ‘ Upc 3 , bye Toe the 1 lain? j or ft ue tees ; s : : ‘ ‘ 4 ‘ | . Aa ti } é \ aa ri jut Vy tn News seenc c f el ATLL ; We company as allegea in the complaint‘ hil We : Answer: No. ae | hha ; r the Superior vourt 1 oa orth varolina, January Term 19135. No, 35 ae i redell ou. ty. ke : ™ . Un, AO | ti ' eae VS, eta ‘, Deaton ae . i] I ee , 5g » P, McLean, ontirued by consent. ae i vs. at +e ee ah Pr, Anderson ; ie | H ning on to be heard before Judge |. ‘. Yhedbee and it appearing Oo, 34 4 HP ti This cause com enoversy have been settled out of ourt: Lt is, therefore, \ oover, ar ; i ; ‘ea ps j ontroversy ! 2 en : ; e ees i . . re ce M had 4 that all jatters -— ee t this action be dismissed and that the cost of this action VS. +a! f { bi oe and ad } —wWped Uiich site . See e4 . , i] ) aa orcer rg = 1 rk against this plaintiff. . A. Haithcox., e following jury ”. ¥. ennarat, J. sinul ; US By 1 y hy é spLEPK Aprile ——T ' "} ihee | t-) ae Wt Wi be taxea by tn ‘ ‘ ° hedbee Ly : « de S8ODD, K ‘ hambers, ‘ : ellinger, scices rney i / sia : ! é Judge rresiciyr te ss a j sell = 2 i114 . 3» : ’ : lo ‘felt : : : es ji n, ; ’ a ee a. oaks Noy ry ing sworn and empanelle t'< thelr verdict We ‘ a Say th ir the 1 i@§ ul litte t ther 1 liot i} ay uh. : n the Superior vVourt Is t} erendant indebted to the plaintiff, if so in what amount’ ‘ eat ae "th Carolina, nuary Term, 1913. nswer: res Loc.14 witho interest. Us + t anu ph *? ' ! Tat | eat edell unity. i is if ae . - , e { iN iH a mit, os Bl i ‘hua js ankir pany é O. ve 7 t Hit e Se 2 oe “uoneycutt 1 ’ vs P + ; iy : . . ’ . Wass ? R. o we o ey } eri Hi a i oO. RY. Coy ntiruea for the defendant, % PP Se - . h dbee Judge : it A : ee . ies cs be spe hi . ion t. Le . ne re JUUBY, ; ah Hh 4) y His ree Co: Arie: on LO we 1lCalbu 43 L Sie arti ave se tled all 0, 4§ N i aia it appearing to th aes Mase eee x4 and adiuaged that : od +) ng ae A. : MPG, a m tt lho T+ . there ore prauerec ana auy 6 . e Uli H ee Ree rontrover ut of Court vee ete : rx a,ainst the v Ane natters in controvers i na that the cost be taxeu by tn lera a,alinst sia a \ : : ; tie n 1 ismissed an Ulla U : : : ed} ee, A % Wile i a 1} Jury; ‘ . ’ e - ’ o . ne ‘ ag 4 intitt u ‘ pesiod . ° ° Aili, ° . 2 , ° ° . ae , ° . + me: , Re) oe oe Pay ds ‘ Rg . A a ee nd. 5, i I Liapd di ‘n and ¢ for thelr srdict y they find | | the i e ut itte » 4 fn 4 9 i , — In the superior vou irst id the @@@étntiff i: arry with t efendant a llegeu in the complaint’ | a r LiiAy Tanuar Ter ] 113. > WE é ; J j ; a Ag laintif hee ’ th tate of ‘ troli:a for twe re mKin « ‘ ANY ‘ 4 ‘ i io ¢ + a eke * ; : as rs next proceedi iling laint “ies } ‘ ie . . “J nswer: 1¢s 14a 9 edbee and being . - , \ before Judge iis 4« "Hee oe : bas a +4 1+ ’ ‘ ' ‘ompiais: wit araha aye Ly “m ¢ be hearc beiore . nay have been Ag ir ; th ef ant it adul ry a ill esse an the complaint with Warshal] 4 i¢ AU Lng 4 : e of controversy %%* : b bet i 4 i 4 tha murt that all atters 01 Pasheges that this action ¢€ iff by rrilli 7 ; r Ay LU appear 2 re : dered and adjuacee re 7 he pla . ” ‘wep: Ve . AY : sure - ¥ thererore, order ea ‘- - or ti apk a ainst the plaint io Answet 3. i - anata tied 4 9st of this action be taxea Dy tne v : LSmis ™ ee Cee . Xhedbee, urt Did e ant commit ul a1] ir. th laint wit 7 . . ts , ‘ \ Judge :resicile. 4 a Uulman “herrill‘ a 7 _ nsive ; it ie I . i aka eee 913. hi a bpwary 4s ly , Ba } Pri u b il 2. Af” a “ LOGE a v4 ' 9 I « ‘*& Oe ie 183 5 14 a ives adjournvent un i — ; . ‘i ‘ , ‘owni rtne: K his mnorable nh SAERS OF Sere ——— 7 J ees cc’ : 65 ole eh The followir JULY, Ge ire yy te 8s GRNLNG, vs Ue HAPUNGSS, ¥ / MA , La kn nee VS. >> Ye Hotimann, LV. 5S. Lippard, ©. 5. Gilleland, T. 3. *hite, —<——_ + sire Tresiding. Bessie Smith. . 0. Rodgers, J. >. ilarp, 3. F. Yaugh, J, A, Vorpew and 3. N. OL apish béin, sworn and empanellea for their verdict say they find the issues submitted to them as follc Lst. d the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, ' ‘ $ . ‘ } for te end, as the plaintiff been a resident of the “tate of ‘0: svolina for two , years pricr to the commencement of this action? Answer: Yes. a i ' , , i slleced in the ny nt with Arthur : Third: 'id the defendant commit adultery as all od in the complaint i rthur ‘ POOKS, Answer fes. nos Hart. The followin; ge jury: . 2 LOYG, #e LPOWNINE, 1artnesgs or ‘mann, ippard, ll. . ac1G18nG. Ty s. hite : igers, be: de tee Oe ’ a A Busn, J, ae OPrrowWw and . . Ni. Lapish being swor: and empanelled tor their verdict gay they fird the issues submitted to them as follows; A tiff anda defendan| intermarry as lege in the co ery veraict say they fird ntiff ana defenda bt ma Ll Wop: Vv . isSwWer: res. »pPrEAC i} laint? Years priop CLelland? ageniardt, ‘ ‘ lambers, i. C el ly .. Jurnery, ‘ SL SRE. ds Ls ‘elte j . Norrison and R. A ilgomery being sworn and empa.in pd 7 thelr verdict say t at rs 1d the issues submitted to them : follows plaintiff and the sf. ndat intermmaried a in answer: 21 | defendant desert and abandon the plai:rtiff and adultery as allegec in the complaint h km evis: handler VSe rocery i x b y ‘ t i f h ‘ j U es ea It is oraerec Si vist eae 4 ‘ ier vs . atl . . ., ’ lo ed to nm rese ntative s+ lainti + be a W jo i oarty to this suit. ne oS Ny Gnd Ariat She fala unsreg Pry Wed Lr orvvseg, “a : Pr: TRA OAL, SAHA ALA " Hf Uff Pisa e- _ S , m para G ae and Wis idee a, 7.5. Wh ez, 0: ) \f ¢ g gt pr AAW t™: SP ~4H On fos, (?: h a) aa Gret .4. 7 a (Jv ow i cnn coer for ad o> Q ' ed JUAN arch drawn aud a mubual feck Or cbes AE Fant ALkLagyid to Come 1 ared 2 AhL 7 to y : ’ hee Geo C ‘carne 4 a Zs Acct lio, 44 Luther Eecles The f ins Joe ~— : The following jury; W. F. igenhardt, J. tncaley ASG, CG. . Ayes, attie eeles rhe following Jury; ° ® OY, e #. browning, .- oe iiartnegs Ve ite ‘EDD, +: ae NamDders, Ge ie 2 ger, 5 u ery, atti - : . Hoffmann, Se ees , » Giltelaend, T, 5 hite io Mis useei), TT. i. Williams, J. Li: Cledfelter, s, . Morrison . Rodgers, J. P. narpe, 8. s, Waugh, J, As Morrow and na . Mont nery being sworn and empanelle«u for their eir Lapish being sworm, and empanelled tor their verdict gay the verdict say they fird the issues submitted to them as follows: . ‘ . ¥ i 3 at ‘ . tw » e : . . > a . 2 3 = 5 5 fird the issues submitted to them as follows; y Ist. ere plaintiff ana defenda tt marred as alleged: l i laintiff and defendant intermarry as allegea in the complaint? NEWOP: 168. ui ad a Answer 16s. ond. is the plaintiff been a resident of t ‘tate for two years prior to — ‘ . the ins if f is :t3 i tt om @ the tate of ‘or h arolina for twe years prior 4 ini Luti Ce ri Og t is ac Lic eel S a , P . E y \ _p 2. as | i ae inswer: Yes, defendant commit adulter nswer: Yes. + " ; ee j the ‘oO Yy j t v4 CY a »1) it adu tery us alleged in the compaaint with Roy ‘ceLellana? answer. ley Reaman .bner Nesbit S. i : £ » erder vs. yntirued under former order. Nes ry . i . ‘ 5 Thes Vacons. ny ir.uc UNUEe! , " artha Nesbit. The following jury; - BP. Dagenhardt, J. Fin@iey Cass, G. HH, ayes, Db. L. Yebb, i ; hambers, ii. C. bLliinger, E. R. Jurnery, c « BuUseeli. TL hy, Ri csenme, ¢. obs lodfelter, E. . Yorrison O,. ° : 3 ussell and KR. a. ‘ontgomery being sworn and empa .nelled for their verdict vs say t at find the issues submitted to them as follows: ' + 7e ‘in i. : we ‘Armer rriian + = We ant : e ; > . : . , : 1 7 * onstructic ‘9, ontinuea unae former opcer, Let. as the plaintiff and the defcndat intermmaried as alleged in the Complaint? answer: Yes. the defendant desert and abando bry as alleged in the complaint iInSwe ; es. ord. Has the :laintiff been a resident of the State of iiort! arolina two years i vil 47 eee ere any prior te the beginning of this action: tat 1 L Answer: Yes, handler . VSe gn ates a i nion Grocery Suppl: Oimpany. rontinued, It is oraered allowed to ma no ¥ 3m” notusate Sha fa La wus 4 d rr uy Md kr orvvsed, 13 6. Kaoy & - . : JM’ THA BAL, YA Ha ALA | a w 4 Off frrr o- a a3. de 7 fares G igs FS GAthe Rand, J-9 WAKE, GT a/ ° c Sf) a ¢ Q MAI ie f™ 1P~4\ arfor, RA aravg kK a pe P onmA ad ty ec (Awoavw a ud AAA herd Arhinved - Jur Anh draun ascel Qa nrsbual eC Faur a LkLaqy cd. to COmL ANN a sed “ae iin’ Te ¢¢7?¢ | ‘ “ef, 7 2 | f rt p a ‘a lo ZH ¢ Dot f lO 44 Luther Eecles m1, ms wer . ¢ WpPyv: . “ boVva e Bigs OWnl lattie ccles. ne following a Y3 : a 7 ae ‘ Wadr os e we lartness, af “ loffmann, . - i 9) ar Cly le . Gil lel land, . - hite . oO. Yodgers, J. P. iarpe, %. v, vaugh, J, As Morrow ana ” N., Lapish being swor: and empanelled to them as allegeau in fird the issues submitted and defendant intermarry as Answer Yes. .intiff ‘ irntiff been a resicent of the State of lhoprth to or encement r -$ni acti nswer: Yes. 2 id cefendant commit act tery alleged in the « . unswer es. rued under former order. OO. ‘ a1) ~ Le RusseLs VS ¥ . 2 $1} ay? @) ory sr sy er } yr ti Ne ontinue anae former order, . ? ~¥ ‘4 ni 4 e i QO I ‘ alker ntvinu inaeyx ° r > ‘tatesvil i] lize pany 5 . an 4 > ~ . a 2 i allowed file exceptl . . Ai - 2a i - 2 ¢ lls ontirued. e will i . ° e 4iic We > } nawtan | . r Neath co the plaintif!i u id AY) 2s nt jueCad. Auli sft var’ b+ : 7 n F ative f that the personal re resentative Ss ‘ . 5 cn Snes i uke himself a party to this suit. Six : s1107 . A dhe de Gods ° atha orrison. lias summons. ‘ ‘ ‘os . ° at wOid 4 +inued under former re Vi é Urry t i pal ye viliu Buca ne 3m “ohuste - fala wrucg ‘TRA AAL, VA HO asses, s tf: il: aoe WAR Re Oa nc J, trs, GP~-4H OA for, Le i Ae: / Jur 40 Th drawn aud Q Mars A de fare C (Jlivorw «4 ut AAA (Zp Ay Mk far Orrmang, RF ae aut the complaint? irolina for twe A (3b fay & w Hf Uff firs o- / a3. 7.5. Whe ee, ‘ “hg 9.q. mene pont Ate Cal Reh Crdlued HE Faut- atlewyed te leme 10 ated 2eFkhY hecu beef dW ety Co Zr cel for their verdict follows: Say they ed. It is oraered i: f be allowed to ma ) ne nos br ~Wil er artha vs jart Se art. © pDlLaintiry The fo ive ma veru nsw plainti cr i or t is 3 defendan swer: Ayes, UD. ts ana + ~ been a resid ‘ action’ answer: Yes it adul 1e@s. Uv COT followi bs ju T Yebt » Nw Busseli, T. insSwe defendant alleged t at find the and the def age 6s. desert and at in the compla 5 Wwe es, e /laintiff been a re inning; of this actior inswer es. Uj ply 0 any ourt tal jour onves Ome Ler’ ‘tate ry; . FP, Dag arct, J. indley Ci Ne ambers, ti. C. Lellinger, « “Siesame, J, L. Cledfelter, &. ry being sworn and empa .nelled for issues submitted to them a follo We ndat intermmaried a: alleged in the ay } yw + f)pyrwe ” ' 2 “owe ; Llowing ure e WF, igenhurdt, J. Fincley 6a, C,H, Hayes, ebb , he pr< ’ ) T ° Vi» ‘. ae Nanders, a o elli er ‘ Jurnery ussell ‘Llliam i] lt . Morr se uUvoe. ’ Le bis Ah A228 1S» Ve De © c aler, e ° © rris 50%) eve | MOI ery being sworn and empanelleu for th eir act Say they fird the issues submitte to t is follows: Gdefenda ht marred as allered er: Yes for two years prior to Ba tee urnery, " orrison their verdict n the plairtiff and commit fornicaticn it! na 2vils nt of e State of ort} arolina inued, State of North Carelina Department of Archives and History Raleigh CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTI This is t are true and accurate (tit le) sheet preced} “L{imed hereon; that the records tion rat) It target sheet(s) were Sections target cords ln order to insure filmed, they were and film approved ef ipned) oe Lo rts -amera Jpe rat Date th equipment ey Eee rere ye Rey + OEE ERLE EE EET ; os : 4 j ba ih rg ately ee et ee et Lea qe ree hi pp iateerpage ss vet ee In the. Superior court. Jan ua ryTera 1915. Judgments ge N. S. Smith . + ot ' This cause ge ing on te Le heard at tne January Tera,” ‘1913, ofthe supertar Court of Iredell nelkaky j beferé nis Honer, H. W, Whedbee , “Sudge Presidingy ‘ana | at “wppe earing to the court t at the defendant since the consiftiGenent @f this @etion | hai sopban Aned an absolute divorce from the plaintife, and it “agpeating’ further that the: anterl- ‘oc utery jucgment heretofore rendered in this cause was appeared. ‘from “by the defendants. and that said appeal was not prosecuted inthe i a clean tute shy by agreement of ate: parte jes; ; ' ie It is therefore censiderea and adjudged by: tive “count that ~the eeie interiocttery. judment by consent ef all parties shall be cangeled ‘from the. records, ‘ad: that mage: + judgment shall be considered a full satisfaction ant rel odse of said interlocdtery st judgment en the part ef the said Lueile Smith to the ‘gata We SK smith; It°is censidered and ad jucgec further by the court. that ce ‘gotten. Sin: be and the same is hereby dismissed, -H, WH, Jhedbee, Tudge Presiaings By censnet; Lewis « Lewis, Attys ror rlaintitf i Attys fer Defenaant. Nerth Carelina In te Superier Ceurt. Iredell Ceunty January Term, 1913, Atha Chair Cempany vs Judgment. F. S. Kennett This cause ceming en th be heard at the January Term, 1913, ef the Superior Court et Lredell Ceunty befere His Henor H, W, Whedbee, Judge Presiding, ana it appearing to the court that the parties te thie action have settlea and cempromised their differencea; It is therefore considered ana adjudged by the Ceurt that the Plaintirr recever of the uefendant the sum of $225.00 and that the cests of this actien be taxed bythe Clerk of this Ceurt against the -laintirf. H, W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. By censent; R.: B, MeLaughlin, Atty for Plaintiff. Dorman Thempson, Atty for Defenuant. Nerth Carelina In the Superior veurt Iredell County January Term, 1913. R. B. Joyner vs Judgment, City of Statesville This cause coming te be heard ana being heara before His iiener, H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding, ana a jury at the January Term, 1915. erthe Superior Court or Iredell County, and at the conclusion ef the evidence introduceu b, the plaintirt, the defenaant moved for a judgment as of non-suit, and the Ceurt being et the epinion t at said motion sheula be allewed; It is therefore considered and aajuagea by the Court that the plaintiff be and he is here by non-suited and that the defendant go here ot with cut! day. H. W. Wedbee, Judge rresiding. North Varelina In the Superier Ceurt. North Uarolina In the Superior Court. Iredeli County January Teom, ivio. Iredell County January Term, 1915. Lerene vetten Seed Oil Millis, inc., Imperial Cotten O11 Cempany,, Hcp Juagment. -~VS-- Judgment. Town ot Mooresville, rarker Cloth Company. This cause ceming on for trial at this term er the Court derere His Honor Harry Wheavee, Judge, a the piaintiif not veing readyfor trial in open This cause ceming on to be heard at this term or the Ceurt . cvceurt submits to veLuntarynon-suit. ipon the appearance Locket of saia Ceurt, anu it appearing to uhe Ceurt, that the it is, therefere, vrdereu vythe Ceurt that g@id cause oe, ana th same hus been settlea and cempremiseu; . same is herebynwn-suitea, gnd that the defendant recover its cest against the piaine:: It is theretore, consiuereu anu aajuagea by he court, that Bhe First : tarf and his senda, te be taxeu bythe Clerk eo: the Court. National Bank, Garnishee be relieveu ana discharge. rrom liability, by reason ox its turming over tne frunas to parties plaintitr and defenuant: * : H. W. Whedoee, [t 18 further censiuerea ana aajudagea, that the plaintiff recover the © Judge rresiding. cost or tha action, same to be taxea by the Clerk or the Court. H. W. Whedvee, Judge Presiding. # — bed Ps th ee - beet Mo) eee o ye —-_ | 4 a — ; : Nerth varelina in the Superier veurt ijredell vounty January Term. ivls 5, A. Hoover ana i. UC. Halithcox, Eaecutors, -~-VS-- Judgment. CG. a. Haithcox, vefendant. This cause ceming en to be heard at this term of the Court” before Iiis Honor Harry Whedbee, Judge and jury and being heard upon the whole record, and the issue: " Te the defendant indebted into t 6 plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? anc the jury having answered as its verdict One Hyndred Thirty Two & 14/100 Dellars (3132.14). It is therefore, comsidered and adjudged by the Ceurt that the plaintiff-executors, recover ef the defendant the sum on One Hundred Thirty Twe and 14/100 Dellars, and the cost of the action te be tuxed by the Clerk of the Ceurt. Hs YW. Whedbee 2 Judge Presiding. Nertn Careline. In the Superier Court Iredell Ceunty JanuaryTerm, 1915. W. T. Dixen, Plaintiff, ae a Judgment. Seuthern Railway Company. Defendant. This cause ceming on te be heardat this term ef the Court pefere His Hener Harry W edbee, Judge and jury, and being heard upon the whole record, and the issue submitted, and the jury having feun@ in response to the issue: "was the plaintiff injured by the negilence ef the defendant as alleged in the Complaint? Ne." It was therefore censiderec and adjudged by the Ceurt that the plaintiff recover "Nothing "because of his said ac$ien, and that the defendant go hence without day. W. H, Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Metien to set aside verdict ana for new triai. Metion uenieu anu erenuant eacepts. Juagment as set out in the record, ana deienauant a gain exce pts and appeals te the supreme Ceurt. Notice of appeal waive. Apeal abond fixed at $90.00. By censent sixty days alloed theplaintiff te serve case eon appeal, and defendaat of ours sixty days there after te serve counter case, or eaceptions. H, W. Whedbeg Judge Presiding. Nerth Carelina In the Spperior Ceurt jerth Carelina Superier Court — , Iredell County January Term, 19135. Iredell Ceunty. ) January Term, 1915. J. A. Davis Jr. and Wife y = . d. Conger hos. Jd ger; L. B. Davis, Piaintiff. -VS- Galliher, seard of Cemmissioners of ) Judgment. PS --vs-- JUDGMENT. ) ) Galliher Iredell County, Defendants, This cause coving on te be heard at thés term of the Superior Ceurt — This cause coming on to be hearf ef the Court befere His Hone of Iredell County béfere His loner H. W. Whedbee, judge Presiding, anc being heard ece y P ° : ; or Harry W. Whedbee, Judge and a jury, the feme plaintiff being feund te be the owner th ified compla#int ef the plaintiff, and itt a pearing that the defendants oe. ei | , ; ef the land over and upon which the alleged damages sued for is lecated, and is ness+* ‘ustly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum ef $256.60 with interest thereon a ree ary party to this action, and having come in and made herself a party plaintiff with from the 29th day of September 1911, due bypromissery notes and the defendants : " ’ ' = . , her husband, J? A. Davis, JYr., and the said cause having cempremised andsettled ajira” having failed to appear anc aBpswer: Se ee ee ee Spa ae eee withdrawn, and mistrial had: It ig therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover It is, therefore, censidered bythe Ceurt that the plaintiff recever of the defendants of the sum of $256.80 with interest theron from the 29th aay of of t e defendants, for the land apprepriated and taken for Lhe new read acress the September, 1911, until paid, which said sum is hereby declared a specific Lienupon lands ef the plaintiffs, tiie top soil taken from other lands ef the plaintiff and used the lands mentioned and described in the complaint; and that said lands be sold at on the public reads of the county; the less of and damage te all crpps ef every descr: public auction to the highest bidder for cash at the caurt nouse door in Statesvillt : : : : : iptien upon the lands ever which said land, in fact, in full of all claims and demands N. C. aiter thtrty days advertisemant in a newspaper ublished im said Count and : _ Perrsae , vs which the plaintiffs or either of them have against the Cemmissioners ef tredell Couns that the proceeds from said sale be .onlied to the payment of this judgment and the es pay — tyor the County of Iredell, the sum of fifty vellars. costs of action. It is further orcered that the palintiffs recover ef the defendants It is further considered and adjud gelialy syd be and is =: - r eee MS* er the cests of the preceedings before said Beard of Cemmissioners including the cost ef ereby appointed a cemmissioner te make sale of the 1 af s ° a e lands aforesaid ; the appraisement, and all cost except that of their own witnesses, the same to be It is further considered and adj dt be and is judged that the plaintiif charged against the palintiffs. hereby authorized and empowered to bit and become purchaser ef said lands at said. sale. a H. W. Whedbee, Juage Presiding. H. W. Whedbee, Judge Prestding. North Carelina In the Superier Court Iredell County January Term, 1915. Statesville Plaster and Cement Company. vs Order of Reference. J. L. Russell and W. E. Morrison, at This eause coming on to be heard before His Honor, H. W. Whedbee, at the January Term 1913, of the Superior ceurt of Iredell County, judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that this cause is one that should be referred, and — it appearing further that the parties hereto have agreed that same may be referred; It is tierefore considered and adjucged that the said cause be and the & same is hereby referred tp W. A. Bristol, whe shall hear all the matters in the ‘a pleadings and that he shall report his findings of fact and his cenclusiens of law to the next term of the Superier Court of Iredell County. se H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. By consent; Dorman Thonpson, $ Atty for the Plaintiff. Zz V. Long. Atty for W. E. Morrison. SL AI IDE Nerth Carolina. } Superier Court. Iredell County. ) January Term. 1815. q U. S. Gas Machine Ce.,) 4 -vs- JUDGMENT. U. C. Harwell, i : s This eause ceming on te be heard at this term of the Superior Ceurt of Iredell County before His Honor, H. W. Whedbee, judge Presid&ng, and being heard upon the verified complaint of the plaintiff, and it appearing that the defendant is indeb- ted to the plaintiff in the sum of $92.70 with six per cent interest htereon from the ed to 4 th dayef January, 1909, due bypremissorynotes, and that tue defendant has fail appear for himself: It is therefore,considered and adjudged that the phaintarf recever-ef the defendant the sum of ninety-two and 70/100 ($92.70) Dellars with interest theren at six per eent from the 4th cay of January, 1909 until paid, «nd the cests of this actien te be taxed by the Clerk. It is further considered and adjudged the that judgment be declared a specific lien upen the preperty mentioned and described in the compalint by Exhibit thereto attached, and that the game be sold fer the payment of the judgment and cesta ef the actien. H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Nerth Carelina. ) Superier Court. Iredell County. / January Term, 1915. Wyseng & Miles Cempany, Incorporated. vs Plaintiff. . j Judgment. Jas. Wf Brown, ahécLorane Cetton Seed. 011 Mills, Incopporsteds , This cause coming on te be heerd atihis term of the Superior Seurt of Iredell County, peforeyis Honer.Warry W. Whedbee, judge Presiding, and appearing te the court that the defendant Jas. W. Brown is justly indebted te th plaintiff, in the sum of Five Hyndred forty Hight « 84/100 Dellars, subject te: credit ef One Hundred Vellars en June llth, 1912, and six per cent interest t! from May 15th,.1911, due by premissory note under seal; and it further appearing process has been duly servedsupon ‘said defendants and that the plaintiff's Com has been duly verified and the defendant has failed to appear and answer; and fi fubther appearing that the piaintiff has expended the sum of T,irtyFive & 09/10 Dellars for insurarce on said prpperty due under the terms of the contract of It is, therefor, considered and adjussed that the laintiff recever the defendant Jas. W. Brown, the sum:of Five Uundred Ferty, 84/100 with inte thereon from the 15th. day of May, 1911, subject te a credit of $100.00 June 11th. 1912. and the further sum of $35.09. due for insurance, together with the costs of this action, te be taxed by the Clerk ef this Ceurt and the said sums aré hereby. declared a specific lien upon the machinery described in the complaint. It is fubther adjudged the plaintiff is entitled tothe immediate posession of the machinery described in the Coempalint. It is further adjudged that said machinery be seld at public auctie the highest bidder, fer cash, in the tewn of Meoresville, N. C., in {redell Ci after 20 days advertisement and that the preceeds from said sale be applied in discharge ef the principal andinterest ef this judg ment, tegether with costs That H. P. Grier, be, and is hereby appointed a commissiener to make § sale and the plaintiff is hereby authorised to bid become a purchaser at the $ said machinery. H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Nerth Carelina) Superier Ceurt Iredell Ceunty) January Term, 1913. Rebecca Hawkins, and ethers against Julia Reminger, Josephine Gilbert. This cause woming en te be heard before His Henor, Whedbec, Judge, © on appeal from the Clerk ef the Superior court ef Iredell Ceunty, after hearing the evidence, the ceurt finds as a fact that an actual partition of the lané described in the pertition in this preceeding can be had, and the shears of Julia Rominger, one- sixth in value ef said land, and of Josephine Gilbert, ene-sixth in value of s&id ten- anta in cemmon without injury to any ef the other tenants in cemmon and parties intere ested; and it appearing te the court that the said Julia Rominger andJosephine Gilbert desire te have their shares alletted in severaltyanc are willing te have the same all-~ otted at the Seuthern end of said tract ef land, and that the ethers .enants in commen desire to sell their interest in saidiand and divide the preceeds acgording te their ~ respective interests as set eut in the petition in the preceeding it is therefore orde erea that S. 0. Lazenby, L. Cc. Stevenson, uW. D. Sides be und they are herbey appei- nted cemmissioners, and they are Girected, as soon as practical, te meet en the pren- ises, and afterbeing dulysworn, te divide said land and te assign anc allet te Miss Julia Roeminger andte Nrs. Jesephine Gilbert their Shares in said land at the Southe- rn end ef said tract, te with, te each of them one-sixth in value ef saic tract of land bymetes and beunds,. Said Cemmissioners whall report their preceedings in the premises te the clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County as arly as -racticeable, under their hands er the hands ef any two of them. J. G. Lewis is hereby appointed a commissioner, and after the ceming in and cenfirmatien of the report afarsaid, he is autherized and directed te effer the reamining land, (after ghe shares ef Iulia Reminger « Josepsine Gilbert have been assigned and alletted te them) at public auction at the Ceurt house door in States- ville, en the fellewing terms, wiz 1/3 casy, 3/3 in 6 months, 1/3 in 12 months with interest on deferres payments, cr presentlyis beund by state if they se desire. The cests ef this proceeding shall be taxed as fellews; against Julia Reminger and Josephine Gilbert, each, on sixts ef the costs ef the preceeding for actual division, Bi of said land tethis time and the fatal cost of the diwt ion, all other cests shall be taxed against the ether tenants in cemmon, aul ; te their respective in! said lands. County fer fu Nerth Careina In the Superier Ceurt Iredell County Feb. Term, 1915. bit Abner Nes JUDGMENT. vs Martha Nesbit. This cause ceming on te be heard, and being heard befere His Hener HarryW. Whedbee, Judge, and the jury, amd the jury having answered all the issues submitted tethem by the Ceurt, and which are made a part ef the recerd in this cause, | non tt ie dt a ainst the def andant,: 5 2 LA ee 1G; and as in favor of the plaintiff It is therefore, eréered and adjuaged by he. Court that bhe bends of matrimony existing between the plaintiff te diselved and that the plaintiff, avner Nesbit be granted an absolute diverce from the bends of matrimony with the def ndant, Martha Nesbit. H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. north Carelina In the Superior Court Iredell Ceunty. Feb, Term. 1913. Martha Heart Jydgment. vs Amos Heart. This cause ceming an te be heard, befere his Hener, Harry W Whedbee, Judge, md the jury, and the jury having answered all the issues submitted tothem by: the Ceurt,' and which are made a part ef the recerd’in this cause, in faver of the plaintiff and against the defendant; It is therefere, erdered and adjudged by the Court that the bends of matrimeny existing between the plaintiff and defendant be diselved and that the plaintiff, Martha Heart, be grahgd an absolute diverce from the bonds of matrimeny with the efendant, Ames Heart. H. W. Whedebb, Judge Presiding. *espne Teseqpeus “HA “H © a He sae ee mf pies Je Sut *qaedeu cS te ae i Pa Ye, wie ah hou Sg I ale MG, ee We ep atouy yoezeu! o9 hee ys 5 re eer Saar ek a ee Me eee ~ SS es - elit B es Nerth Cagelina. In the Superier Ceurt, Iredell County. Feb. Term. 1913. D, P. Sartin, Tin F. Leng, vs. JUDGMENT. Clayten 0. Treutman, and Sallie Troutman hie Wife. This cause coming en te be heard, and being heard before his Hener, Harry W. Whedbee, Judge, and it appearing tethe Ceurtithat the summons in this actien wasdulyserved on the defendants, Clayten 0. Treutman and Sallie Teeutman, and it ruts her apoearing to the Court that the cemplaint in this action was duly filed within” the first three days of the term of this Court, and it further appearing te the Court that ne answec has been filed in the pleadings and that the efendants have made ne appearance in Court: It is therefore, considered and adjugged bythe Court: FIRST: That the plain- tiff, D. P. Saptin, recever ef the defendants, Clayten 0. Treutman and Sallie Troutaan FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFT: DOLLARS, $450.00, principal, and $13.95, THIRTEEN DOLLARS AND NINETsFIVE cents, interes due to 27th, day of Jan. 1913, same being the first day of the term of this Ceurt. It if further ordered that the plaintiff, b. P. Sartin, recover interest fren Jan, 27th, 1913. being the first day ef the t erm ef this Ceurt, en $450..0. FOUR DRED AND FIFT. . DOLLARS; action te be taxeu by the Clerk. It is ; | s alse and further considered and adjudged by the court; That the olaint bie Fe g Leng, recover of the defendants, Clugten 0. Treutman and Sallie Treutman, 59s! THIRT: FIVE D 7 acs 1 FIVE DOLLARS, principal and $3.33, Three dellars and thirty three cents, & eat due to the 27t! ue to the 27th day of Jan. 1913, sume being the first day of the term of thi Court. iti s further ordered that the pl&intiff, L. F, Leng, recever interest fre Jan. a7t h, 1913, being the first day ef the term of this ceurt, en $35.00. THIRT: DOLLARS i ‘ : » principal due, at 6% until paid, and for the cest e this action te be py tie Ceurt, It is further erdered and adjudged by the Ceurt that the Mertgage described in the Cemplaint and executed by Clayten 0. Troutman Sallie Treutman Sartin and L. F, Leng, the plaintiffs in this actienybe foreclosed nae ns | ef he redemption of the defendahts in the lands cenveyed in said wart , sed, and that 7 | ceaue | ’ at ceb.V.Leng t+ and heise herehby appeinted a Commissioner @ te sei sais lands at oublic auctien a. the Court \ieuse deer ef Iredell fter due advertiseneat, @8 provided by law, and make principal’due, at 6% until paid, and fbr the cost ef this — Nerth caeigne: } Superier Ceurt. Iredell County.) Feb, Term, 1913 . 0. “Ws Smith, ) vs Judgment. ) ) ) } Bessie Smith This cause ceming en to be heard at this term of the Superier Ceurt of Iredell Ceunty befere His Henor, H. ¥. Whedbee, Judge Presiding ama 4 jury anu the jury fer its verdict having feund al! issues submitted in favor of the principal, ad that the defendant has Cemiitted adultery with One Arther Brooks as alleged fn the complaint,. It is therefere censiderea and adjudged that th- beads of Matrimeny existing between plaintiff and defendant be and the same game are hereby dissolved. It is further erdered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the Coats ef action te be taxed by the Clerk. H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Nerth Carelina Iredell County ) Merchants anc Farmers Bank) ) of Meoresville, N. C. 4 / vs Jehn WY. Brown R. B. Brewn J. ©, Brewn ny oO Ve ° Smith This cause ceming on te be heara Ceurt, befere His Hener, H. W. Whedbee, nete sued on has been fully paia by the It is therefore ordered and and costs be taxed by the Clerk ef this H. In the Superier Ceurt. January Term 1913. Judgment. at this term of Iredell supenier Judge presiding and it appearing that defendants. adjudged, that this action be dismissed Court against the defendants. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Nerth Cores sees } Superier Ceurt. Iredell County.) January Term, 1915. statesville Cetten meen vs ) Judgment. ) y, E. Morrison. ) This cause coming an te be heard at this term ef the Superier Ceurt ef Iredell Countybefere His Hener, H. W. Whedbee, judge Presdding and it app- ecring thar the defendant has failed te appear and presecute his case on appeal. It is therefere considered and adjudgea that the appeal be dismissed and that said defendant pay the costs te be taed by the Clerk. H. W. Wheaubee, Judge presiding. od ~ es oe oy ey 7 | 3 , \ td] + & om < Se 2 ce. Se a Nerth Carelina. Superier Ceurt. Iredell Ceunty. January Term, 1915. Luther Eccles, vs Hattie Eccles. This cause coming en to be heard at this term ef the Superier Court | Tredell County befere his Hener, H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding, and @ jury; and appearing that all ef the issues as herein set ferth been submitted te, and answered: by, the Jury, te tie appromaitive: First: Did the Plaintiffs interesting with the wife, as alleged te the Com- plaint,Ans, 16S. Second: Has plaintiff been a resident of the State ef N. C. for. mere than two years next proceeding the filing of the Cemplaint, Ans. X65. Third: Did Wife Commit adultry with Rey MeLelland as alleged te the Cemplaint, Ans. 1@8. It is therefore ordered and adjudged tiat the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiffs .nd wife, be and the same are hereby dissolved. It is further ordered that plaintiff pay cost ef the action, to be taxed by the plerk. H. W. Whedbee, vuage Presid ing. North Carelina. In the Superier Court. ) ) ) Iredell County. ) JanuaryTerm, 1915, w. C. Meore Et Al stiff.) vs. Judgment. R. Holman, depot. This actien ceming en fer hearing befere his Henor, Whed bee, Judgs , on the motion eof non-suit of Clement and Clement, Attorneys for defendant, thetpiai- ntiff, W. C. Moore takes a nen-suit. It is erdered that the cests be taxed by the Clerk against the plaintiff, Ww. C. Moore. H. W. Whedbee, Judge rresdding. Superior Ceurt. Nerth Carelina. ) In the Superior court. Nerth Gavelina. } ) Lredell Ceunty. Jan, Term, 1915. I Iredell Ceunty.) Jan ary Term. 1913. W. W. Redman, ) J. S. Smith, ) vs. Judgment. vs. Judgmerit. ) : : L. C. « Mott Myers.) . Emma Smith. This cause ceming on fer hearing at this term ef the Court ama thal This cause ceming en te be heard at this term of the Superior Ceurt ef plaintiff having failea to appear and prosecuted his ease: Iredell Co inty befere His Hener, H. W. Whedbee, Jydge Presiding anf the the fe.lewing It is adjudged that the plaintiff be and he is hereby non-suited, ~~ | issues having been submittea anc answered by the Jury. First: Dida the pladntiff intermang with the defendant as alleged in the Cemplaint.? H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. . Answer, 1@S- Second: Has the plaintiff been a resident ef the State eof Nerth Carelina fer two years-next proceediag the filing ef this Complaint? Ans. res Third: Did the defenaantcommit aaultry as alleged in the complaint with Marshall Sherrill? Ans. 1¢5. Fourth: Did the defendant cemmit adultry as alleged in the Cemplaint with Sulvion Sherrill?. Ans. 168. It is therefere considered and adjudged that the bends ef matrimeny existing between the plaintiff and defendant be and same herebydisselved. It is further erdered that the plaintiff pay the cest ef this action te be taxed by the Clerk. H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Nerth Care lina.) Superier Ceurt. \ Iredell County. ) HanuaryTerm, 1913. Marvin Mills, vs Fannie Mills. This cause coming en te be heard at this term ef the Superior before His Hener, H. W. Whedbee, Judge presiaing ad jury, ana the jury having? answerea the issues submitted te them in favor of the plaintiff as Set out in recerc: It is, therefore considered and adjuaged, thet the bends ef matrimony exis ing between the plaintiff Marvin Mills and the vefendant Fannie, be ana the oan is hereby annuled. The cost of the action te be paid by the plaintiff. H. W. Whedbee, Juage Presiding. Nerth Capetanne Superior Court. Iredell Cennty. ) Jan. Term, 1913. Fannie Steckten Judgment. | ) vs ) ) ) Frank Steckten. This cause ceming on te be haerd at this term of the Court befere.tiis Henor, H. W. Whedbee, Judge ana a jury, ana being heara upen the whole record and the issues submitted, and the Jury naving answered the issu¥a: First: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of N. Cc. fer twe years next oreceeaing the cemmencement ef the case. 1¢8. Second: Did the plaintiff and efendant intermang as allegea in the Cemplaint, xes. Tnira: vid the defendant abanaon the plaintifr as alleagea in tie cemplaint? 1es. Fourth: Did the defendant separate himsel! from tne plaintiff aa cemmit for motion and adultry as alleged in the Cemplaint with Mattie Webb? ies. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Ceurt, that the bends ef matrimeny existing between the p, intirr and the defendant be discharged from any ana all liability and respensibilityby reasen of the marriage @posail. H. W. Whedbe. Judge presiuing. Nerth Carelina. In the Superier Court Iredell County. Januar,;Term. 1915. J. C. Hendley. Order Settle Aside. vs Judgment. Jacob Cohen Saas & CO., This cause ceming en te be heard before His Henor, H. Wheaoce, Judge Presitting, at the January Term 1915. ef the Superier Ceurt e Iredell County, pon the motion filea by the derenuants te set asiae the j heretofore of an answer,and the Ceurt finding the racts te be as get up in afficavits filea, and the Court being of the epinion that the juagment she. set asiae: | It is therefore oraered anu aajuageu that the judgment heretofore be ans the same is hereby set aside and the uefendants are alleweu thirty aays file answer. ye H. W. Wheuoee, Juage rresiaing. Nerth Carelina. In the Superéer Ceurt. jreaeil Ceunty,. feo, Term. Lvis. Ww. T. Honeycutt vs Juagment. Mary Hiiza Hene,cutt. This ca se ceming en te oe hearu ad being heara before his Hener, Harry Whedbee, Juage, aa the jury having answered al the issues supmittea te them by the Court, anu which ana made a part of the recera in this cause, in raver ot the plaintitr ana “against the aerenaant; It is therefor:, oruereu au aujuugea by vhe Court that the saia plaintifz 5 Wale Honeycutt be grantea a alverce frem bea and beara from the,@erenaant Mar, Eliza Honeycutt, amu saia diverce frem bed ana veara is se grantea. H. W. Wheavee, Juage rresiulng. Nerth vare:ina. In the Superier Court. lreaell Vounty. January Term, ivla. M. Geouman ) VS. Juagment. Ketchie. ) This cause ceming on te be heara vefrere His ener Harry w. Ae Presiding, and a Gury and the jury having answered the issue. what amount?” xe ef bec. 14th. 19C6. It ig therefore censidered and adjudged that the Plaintiff recover defendant the sum of Eighty three « 38/100 dollars with interest at the rate 6% from May 2lst 1905 till paid, subject to a credit of $10.14 as ef Dec. 14 1906, and the costs of this action te be taxed by the Clerk ef this Ceurt. li. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Nerth = In the Superier Ceurt. Iredell County. ) January Term. 1915. Inter. State Realty Company ) ) vs. Judgment. James W. Brown. } This cause ceming on te be heard and it appearing that the sui ens was sued en tie defendant more than ten days prior to the ceming ef this count and that a verified Cemplaint was filed in this eéurde during the first three days;#& this term and se answer having been filed. It is therefore ordered and ad judged that the plaintiff recever of the defendant the sum of $250.00 with interest from April 21st, 1906 at six pert.’ cent, per annual and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of , this Ceurt. H. W. Whedbee, Judge residing. Nerth Careline.) In the Superier Ceurt. ) Iredell County. ) January Term. 1913. J. E. Clayell, vs. ) Judgment. Imperial furniture Ce.,) This cause coming en to be heard at this term of the Ceurt His Hener, -arry W. Whedbee. Judge -pesiding. The plaintiff cemes inte Seurt and takes 4 nen-suit. It igs therefore adjudged that this aetion de dismissed at plain. tiff cost to be taxed by the Clerk ef this Ceurt. H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Sa ee 8 et el oe ape. ws ae i Ph Re PD 8 ee Fel eee * Ot e Nerth Carelina. ) In the Superier Ceurt. Iredell Ceunty. ) January Term. 1915. Dillon, ) vs. ; Judgemnt. / ) Carter. This e@use> coming en at this term of the Court His Henem._. Narry We Whedbee, Judge Presiding, This course parties have agreed upen & terms and terms have been complied wit. It is therefore adjudged that plaintiff ane défendnat pay theopat each pay in ene half according to terms ef compremise te be taxed by the ‘lerk of this Ceurt. H. W Whedbee, Judge Presiding. OP Be Oe MAIDA 2 1am Nerth Carelina. In the Superior Ceurt, ) Iredell County, ) January term, 1813. vs. } Judgment. Statesville Safe) / & Table Ce., ) This cause coming on te be heard at Shiuary Term, 1913, of the Superior Court ef Iredell Ceunty, before his Tener, H, W. Whedbee, Judge, Presicing, and being heard, and it apperaning to the Court that sinee Lhe Commencemant of this action that the defen@ahtihas paic pleintiff the note on which this actien was brought, and it further appearing to the = Court tat the defendant has agreed to pay all costs: It is therefere érderec and adjudged that the cefendant paythe costs of the action, and it is further ordered that this action be dismiesed, H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. Corn A pe Nerth abies Iredell Ceunty,. ) In the Superier Court. January Term, 1913 J. C. Helmes, ve. Judgment, J. A, Gaither, ) This cause ceming on te be heard before His Honer, Harry W Whedbee, Judge Presiding, anc it appearing te the court that the plain- tiff filed a verefied cem:laint at the Nevember Term, 1912. ef the Super ior of Iredell Caunty asking fer a foreclosure of a certain chattel merts gage cescribed in said cempalint, and it appearing further that the prop- erty convered by said mortgage was seézed under Claim and delivery anc that same has benn sold and the preceeds therefrem applies en tne debt te secure with said sertgage was given: It is therefere considered and ad judged By ‘the Ceurt that sa said mortgage be and the same is hereby forever foreclosed, and that all rights and eguilites of the defendant in and to the prepertydes- cended in said mertgage be and the sme are herebyforever foreclesed and adjudged that the plaintiff recever of the defendant the cests of 7 this actien te be taxed by the Clerk eof this Ceurt, H, W. Whecbee, Judge Presiding, ee Enel a SS CARR, a.” Sho UR Le ee * > +> § ndiar ews, 7 & Po” ABM day, : to ses + * . > ~ - « re. * RI PAs 8m aye ett OP 2 AN O m D Nas, wh rg, vate Nerth carelina. ) In the Superior Court. Iredell County.) January Term. 1910. James. ¥. PHORM: | eh Judgment. A. S. Alley « / Zallie Robinson, ; This cause ceming on te be heard befere His tienor, HV Whedbe , Judge Presiding. and it appearing that sunmmens has been prep-~ erly sued on the defendants and a verified cemplaint having been filed J ~~ a “ demanding recovering of ~868.70+ It is therefere ordered anc adjudged that the plaintiff reves. ver of the defendants t e sum of $868.70 with interest from Nov. 4th. 1910. at sixe per cent, per annum, ana the cost ef this action to be taxed by he Clerk of this Ceurt . H. ¥. Whedbee, Juage Presiding. SES tO ee PO et OF OE ALR eae OS . 4 PG OT 8 OM MMS SOR OMS ITER eS wrk ae ee Nw a ern. RD EM AP OE. ayy Nerth Carelina. ) Superior Court. Iredell Ceunty. Jan. Term, 1913. QR ak. J. L. Russell Betate tf ak y, J. Oliver Raterte. } vs. Judgment. ) This eaugé coming en te be heard at this term ofh the Court before His Hgner, H. W. Whedbee Judge upen the appearance cecket and it appearing te the Court that the Cempraknt in this actten was filed during first three dag of the Court and that same was duly ver- fied acd the cause of action feunded uopn a judgment fer a sum certain and ancillary proceedings were instituted and that a levy was made upon the indebtness ef the Greenville Spartanburg «Andersen RailwayCe. by Virtue’ ef a warrant at Attachment issued te the Sherriff of Mecklenburg County N. C. which Railway Cempanie's office is in Charlette N. C. who were notified te appear at this term efthéeurt and answer the plaintiffs alle- gions as te its indebtness te the defendant W. J. Oliver, That on the cSrd day at Nevember 1912 the defendant %. J. Oliver as principal and New Eugland Casualty Ce., as suretyfiled a bend in this action en the penal sum of Two Thousand dollars condit&ened for the payment at suc: sums of moneyas maybe adjudged in favor after the plaintiffs and against thedefendant W. J. Oliver,- And it further apperaing that no answer has bean filed. It is there- fore censidered ancadjudged that plaintiff. have judgement by the defendnat ¥. J. Oliver and his securét#. It is therefere further censidered and adjudged that J. L. Russell, J. F. Bell and T. F, Johnsen Cepartners recover ef the defendant ¥. J. Olver and New Pngland Casualty Ce. the sum ef Two Theusand dollars te be discharged upon the payment to the plaintiffs the sim Six -yndred Twelve « 56/100 dellars and interest on $553.10, at 6% frem Oct. Seth. 1909 until paid tegether with thefurther sums, of $194.15 Cost in the eveginal judgment add for the ost of this preceedings tw be taxed by the Clerk. H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. * 99 mor oes H : Oak oO ee ene? BAe DD Ae Ree CENA NAO DY TARDE mene 8 Cue ee 3h OM ee OS, ic gn ier or siimaaicmnk i se she am Ae 6h Ohy Nerth Carelina, In. the Superier Court. Nerth Carelina ) Superier C.urt. Iredell County. January Term. 1913. Iredell County.) January Term, 1913. Judgment, Gee. W. Hewn, ) ) ) P.P. Dulin and J. A. Maxwell, vs. i ) V8. Southerm Railway Ce., Statesville Safe & Table Ce. 2 : " : This cause ceming en te be heart at this term ef the Ce urt befere This cause ceming te be heard atthis .erm before His Hia Henor H. W. Whedbee, and jury, and the jury fer their verdict having answered the or Whedbee Jidge, anc it appearing te the Ceurt the summens in this action ~= issues submitted te them in favor ef the plaintiff as set eut in the recerd ad having was personally served on the defendant cerjveratien more than ten days befere é fixed his damage at $284.00 with interest. the first day ef this term and that the cemplaint was @@@y*werified and filed” | It is therefere censidered and ac judged that the plainftiff Gee. W. Hown in the Court within the first three days of this term, and that no answer ha | 4 recever ef the defendant the Seuthern Railway Ce., the sum ef Twe Hundred and Eighty~ been filea bythe defendant in the action, plaintiffs cause of action being a= — four dellars, with interest frem the 12th. day of Nev. 1910, until paid and the cest note of defendants, be it considered and adjudged that the plaintiffs P.-P: : cs of the action te be taxed by the Clerk against the defendant. Dulin and J. A, Maxwell regwover of the defendant Statesville Safe & Table © ' | Lares TeseTeIng the sum ef 9933,16 principal with interest on the sume from September 5th. 191z, at the rate of 6% until paid and the cost ef this actien to be taxed by the Clerk, H. W. Whedbee, Judge Presiding. 2° 2 SA. WS 0% ms BUMBL)F S- ans Pipe ie < Mt Mt PR RBS = SAGO n.* O98 A wee WPI arhGm te AAD DIOR OW OF 6 PRS OT se ow wet ea ~~ ye an tee 2 & <M Hk OIE OWNER URS e ohann ys oo? Lege . OPM ON age om ANON) BW SY OY FDL. He Oe We URTD A eos ® 8 as oe et 3 ) AL ARE OAM: Rains» Sahn we rete, i rey Nerth Carelina) In the Superier Ceurt. \ ) ot Nerth Carelina. ) In the Superier Ceurt. Iredell County) January Term, 1915, \ Iredell County. ) January Termy, 1915. Imperial Cetton Oil Ce., ) In the mattor ef the Eagle — vs. } Jud t. Judgment. ; ihe We vrg. Ce. Re@eivenship . ) James A. Davis. ) This cause coming on te be hear ad being heard befere His eemine on te be heard and it appearing that the H. W. Whedbee, Judge, and a jury, ad the jury having answered the issues 8 Fersonal preperty belenging to said Eagle Clothing Mrg Ce. is not sufficient te pay te them as fellows. he debts of t he said Cerperatien and that the sale of its real estate is nessary Is the defendant indebtned te the plaintiff, and if so in- for the purpese ef paying eff said claims. amount?. Answer $50.40 with interest. It is therefore erdered and adjudged that the said C. V. veils, Receives to It is therefere considered and adjudged that the plaintiff the” and he is hereby autherized and empewered te sell said real estate described in the Imperial Cotton O11 Ce. recemescef the defendant Jas. A. Davis the sm ef $30. : metitien at the public auctien tm the highest bidder en such terms either for cash er with interest on the same per 12th dayef Oct. 1912. and the cest of this acti moredit as the said Received may deem most advantageeus in the tewn of Meoresville on be taxed by the Clerk ef this Court. he promise of advertising the same in the Meoresville Enterprise 4 Newspaper publis...° H. W. Whedbee, 2 Juage rresiding. " shed in Iredell County, ad report his action written ten days te this Ceurt. And this cause is retained for further erders, Feb.5$h, 1915. H. W. Whedbee, Juage presiding. (Se % eh BOY case rin th Carelina,) ae : May Term I9I3, Iredell County,) Be it remembered that a Superier Court begun and held in and fer Iredell Ce .nty en the IIth Menday after the first Monday in Mareh the same being the I9th day ef May I19723.. When and where his Hener 8,F,Leng is present ana presiding and Henerabic W.¢,.Hammer Seliciter present and presecuting in the name of the State, J.M.Deaten,the High Sheriff ef Iredell Ceunty,retumned into epen Ceurt the - names ef the fellewing goed and lawful men te serve as jurers fer the first week ef this ” term, te-wft, ®.B,Lindsay, J.P. Meore,T,M.Hill, Sei, Hines, T.B.Weedvard,M.D, Stinsen,W.L, Harbin, JM. Heward,T.¥.Treutman,J.M.P.Merrison, E.A.Ruaple, W.E.Shaver »JelLe White, P.M. Summers ¥ C.R.Brewn,Sam Rimmer,L...Suther, *ieReARornsthy,?-R,Crecduere,.".Lewrance,H.¥. Jehnéten, HA, Blackwelder,H,W. Streud, J. A, Campbell ,Cerneilus McHargue,W.D.Feimster, J.L. Austin. C.H.Hipps,C.A,Sherrill, J.H. Stewart, oH. P. Sigman, J.S.Merrew,W,G.Hayes,T.P.Mitchell, E.S.Morrisen,V,R.Brawley,C.W, Pharr, James Sharpe,G.F.Mitchelil, and W.Re Smith, fe . Tha fellewing goed ana lawful men vere drawn as Grand Jurers fer the termls ND» St ingen, RS. Merrisen,H.P. Sigman, J,3.Merrew,C.L, Sherr@il,T.D.Mitchell ,J-LeAustin, \. H. A. Blackwelder,H. W, Streoua,C.H.Hipps,Cerneilus McHargue,J.A,Jampbell, J.H. Stewart, Sam Rinmer ,W.D.Feimster,T.M.Hil1,J.M.?.Mprrieen,and F.E.Creedmere, M.U.Stinsen was sworn as foreman of the Grand Jury. J.C.Thempsen was swern as efficer sf the Grand fury, ae The Fellewing geod and lawful men are Swern as Petit Jurera fer the core week ef this term; T.B.Lindsay,J.P.Moore, T. B. Weodwara, J,M.Hewara, TF, Treutman,C.R. Brows 2 J. -R. Abernathy,». ¥.Lewrance, i, nee C.W.Pharr, James CMarpe, G.eP.Mitchella and WR. Smith, L.L, Suther returned " Net feund in Iredell Ceunty * J«H.Hines,W.G.Hayes and V.R. Brawley were excused fer the tern. Larceny Capias and Cent, No.2 % No. 10 , des , state State eae Affray Plea Net Gailt,.the follewing jury T.B.Lindse : V8. “ ad ae Woodward, J.M.Howard,T.F. Troutman, C.R. Brewn Se * e a D.W.Lewr HN. Je % eaped Jail. ¥.P. WE yee ter. ernathy, ance hnsten,C.¥. Pharr, James Escap Bi eee ee oeLy Sharpe, and CG. F. Mitchell, being swern and empannelled Paul Bradshaw Rufus fer their verdict say that they find beth defendants Ralph .Bewman | Guilty. : Ne. Il ies erie fe. 42. State ‘ Kay * The Supreme Ceurt having sustained ee Larceny : : ‘© , - ae a verdict heretefore rendered in this HM. vs. rns mee BAe Mese White case the defendant is erdered inte custody te abide the sentence herete yerriss Berly fere rendered in this case. us : Ne 53. 18. a ier es or : State State ae ae oo es “es = Vs. Larceny A True Bill. Vs. : oe Retailing. Capfas. cere Si rillie May ree J.D.Kiles a Ne 68. Ne. 17 ae oe whe sen oe State It is ordered ana adjudged by the Ceurt that the def, pay a fine State . “s + we Vs. Gameling Plae Guilty. ef $20.00 each and 1/2 ef the cests each, Vs. Retailing, Capias. Bend fixed at $100.90 BR. Tewell Stakes Swim Sallie Patterson. Xe 72 . eae : It is erdered and adjudged by the Ne. 18 State. Ceurt that the @6f. pay a fine ef . es 0 es we $20.00 and the cests ef this action, State Vs. A.W... ¥. Plea Guiity Vs. Retailing, Capias ana Cent, a fama Armstreng Sallie Pattersen Ris Ne 4 No20/ State om god Mis A.W.D.¥. Plea. Guilty Vs. Retailing Capias. : / acnephen Lensferd E.F.Cass States witness called and failed it is erdered hy ‘ohn ye eae the Ceurt that he pag a fine ef $50.00 and net be allewed to prove attendance in inis Case. Vs. A. W.v.¥. Gapias. Bend fixed at $200, 90 Harvey Benfield. ; ge oa Vesa e sae) Fegery Plea Guilty It is erdered and adjudged by the Ne2s. rt | 3 - Rebert Manny Geurt that the def, be confined in the cemmen Jail State aoa bane ee oe ? ef Iredell County fer the term ef I2 menths and Va. ae Threatened te Kill Capias and Cent, A EB th | is assigned te the Ceunty Cemmissieners te be werked Harvey Benfield fae. “ ee en the Public Reads ef Iredell Co nty during the Ne39. eee, term ef his, 1 risenment State te ft mp ° Vs. Jennis Pearson Ke. i. Ferceable Trespass Cent. fer the Sta one Ne 65 State Vs, 3 J.W.Geednight Ne 19 State. Vs. Ed Lippard Bazter Gebell J.B. Witherspoen No 53 State Vs. Willie May Pee Ne6d. State Vse J.W.Geednight. Ne 75. State V8. J.W.Geedn ight Ne SI State Vs. Will Gibsen Jessie Heward, Retailing A true bill. ; Nuisance, Nel pres. Lesa ylea Guilty Itb is erdercd and adjudged by the Ceurt that the def. be ¢ nfined in the Commen Jail ef Iredell Ceunty fer the tern of I2 months with leave te the gounty Conant te hire her eut during the term ef her impel enment. Retailing. Plea Guilty Retailing Plea Guilty Plea Guilty Judgement suspended as te Jessie Heward aupon the payment ef all the costs ef this action, It is erdered and adjuaged by the court thet Will Gibsen be cenfinea in the Cemmen Jail ef Iredell Ceunty fer the term ef Six months and te the County Gemmissieners to be worked on the” Roads of Iredell-county during the. tera of nie senment, The Ceurt suggests to the supt. of Gang that this bey be water ete, » state Va. Hil Gibsen State V8. Sherrill valten No 74 State Va. Frank Lineberger Ne 69, tate ack Mergan Assault Plea Guilty Juggemert Suspended. Larceny Plea Guilty It is erdered and adjudged by the Ceurt that tue def, that the der. be cenfined in th Cemmen Jail ef Iredell County fer the term of I6 months ana is assigned te the Ceunty Cemmigsien ers te be be werked en the rublic Reads ef Iredell Ceunty during the term ef his imprisenment,. & A. 5.8.9 Plea Guilty It is erdered ana adjudged by the Gourt that the def, be cenfined in the Cemmen Jail ef Iredell Ceunty fer the term ef 7 months and is assigned te werk en the public Reads ef Iredell Ceunty during the term ef his imprisenment. Retailing Net A True Bill A & B. Net A True Bill. A.W.D.W. A True Bill. ier Ceurt Carolina, ) In the Super wee ) pay MAY vHE 29TH 1913. ets according te adjournment at 9350 A.M. Iredell Ceunty,) Mgy Term I?l3. 3 yongrable Court mé It appearing te the Ceurt that Jehn Asdrew Scett Jr. has presented in epen Ceurt a License to practice law issued by the Supreme Ceurt ef Nerth Carelina and that the BBiate . . . , ~ Geurt at the request ef H.y.Grier Atterney administered té him the eath te suppert the Vs. s Affray The Jury having heretofore rendered a verdict . + Censtitutuie ef Nerth Carelina the eath te suppert the Genstitutuien ef the United veer Taoely of guilty in this shige st is erdered and adjudged by the States and the eath ef an Atterney: ; Court that er defendants pay a fine of “T5900 each and It is therefore considered and erdered by the Court that the said Jen Andrew ene half ef tne cest3. Sceti Jr. be admitted and he is h reby admitted te the practice ef the prefessiar s Ne.46 law in all ef the Courts ef the State ef Nerth Careliaa suaye = Affra gages ag to Helland Cont.as wc Baker ne Stutes witnes It is futher erdered by the Ceurt that a recerd ef the préeceedings V8. Re ke Mae ae C wLie sis 428 ; J.P.Baker peeua Salmons,and Net+te taken herein be spread upen the minutes ef this Ceurt. a ) B. F.Leng, Judge Presidinge secpance at the oxi term ef tnis Court. This Henerable Court takes an adjournment until 9330 AM. Tuesday May the 20th 1913. Ld. Ne, 6 a Estate suhge BrETeerNe Vs. Cruelty te animals.Cent. for the Staté én‘atceunt ef the absencé a Ebin Pearce ef Henry McLean States Witness. Henry McLean called and failed . ail ee . Judgement Ni Sei fer $50.00 Instanter Sci Fa ordered. a, ¢.¢.¥. Cent. fer the State on acceunt ef the adsence of the States Witness Henry McLean. It is erdered by the Ceurt that Henry McLean give Bend in the sum ef $100.00 for his appearance at the next term of this Ceurt as a witness in this case. Retailing. Cent. fer the defendant se as te ebtain the evidée of Sam Hannah. Claude Mills and Charles Fulp recegnized in the = sum ef $100.00 each te appear at the next term ef this Court as States witnesses in tris case. ALW.D. Plea net guilty the follewing jury T,.B. Lindsay, R “1. B. Weedward, J.M. Howard, 7. F. Treutman,C.® 2, Brown, Js ReAbernathy D.W.Lewrance,H.N. ‘Jonnsten,C.#. Pharr, James Sharpe,and GF. M4 being swern and empannelled fer nei verdict gay they fine baal defendant cts ana In the Superier Ceurt Nerth Carolina 3 Iredell Ceunty,) Mgy Term I9I3. ia It appearing te the Ceurt that Jehn Asdrew Scett Jr. has presented in epen Court a license to practice law issued by the Supreme Ceurt ef Nerth Carelina and that the Geurt at the request ef H.¥.Grier Atterney adminiatered té@ him the eath te suppert the Censtitutuie ef Nerth Carelina the eath te suppert the Genstitutuien ef the United - States and the eath ef an Atterney: It is therefore considered ard erdered by the Gourt that the said Jen Andrew Scett Jr. be admitted and he is h reby admitted te the practice of the prefessien ef law in all ef the courts ef the State ef Nerth Carelina It is futher erdered by the Ceurt that a recerd ef the préceedings taken herein be spread upen the minutes ef this Ceurt. . B.F. Leng, Judge Presiding. This Henerable Court takes an adjournment until 93350 Ae. Tuesday May the 20th 1913, fA ais Judge Presiding. SNe LR ee, i. io ; 4 spat ig « tate Vs. yaiter Foster rufus Mone ely e j,P. baker ¢.$, Helland Ne, 6 State Vs. Ebin Pearce "hae Ne.7 State V3, Ebin Peapee ‘ yonerable Court meets according t@ aidijournment at 9350 A.M. ‘ rn ¥, vey tr sey Ve -* : { Affray The Jury having heretofore renuered a verdict of guilty in this case,it js erdered anc adjudged by the Geurt that the defendants pay a fine of SIS690o each and each ene half ef the cests. : ‘ Affray Caplas as to Holland Contea to Baker. The Stutes witnesias Press Salmons,and MN s444¢e Baker called and fatl a. It 13 omdeved by ie Cou, tha’ they be ne giiowed *% r ( ' gk nro pequlrvod ~< ar 1 of Cesc * : i ee < ~~ pecvance at the 1 zt term ef this Ceurt. Cruelty ts animals.Cent. for the State én'acceunt ef the absencé ef Henry McLean States Witness. Henry McLean called and failed . Judgement Ni Sei for $50.00 Instanter Sci Fa erdered. — 6.6. W. Cent. fer the State on acceunt ef the adsence ef the States Witness Henry McLean. It is erdered by the Ceurt that Henry McLean give Bend in the sum ef $100.00 fer his appearance at the next term of this Ceurt as . a witness in thiga case, Retailing. Cent. fer the defendant se as to ebtain the evide ef Sam Hannah. Claude Mills and Charles Fulp recegnized in the- gum ef $100.00 each te appear at the next term ef this Court as States witnesses in this case. A.W.D.W. Plea net guilty the follewing jury 7. Be Lindsay, JePs eB, Woodware, foil fleward, 2. F. Tre ubman, 0.2. Brown, 5, %- ARPRABINE D.W.Lewrance,H.N. Jehnsten,C.¥.Pharr, James Sharpe ,and G.F. Mit ir verdict say they find Ne. 28, State Vs. S.A.Foster Ne.27 State Vs. M. Heward Ne.4 State Vs. Xenephon Lensferd Ne.43 State Vs. Filliam I james A.W.D.% Plea Guilty. Jehn Seage a witness in this case Called ang failed te answer to answer it is erdered by the Court that he my a fine ef $20.00 and it is futher erdered that he be net allen te preve in this case, Vagrancy Plea Net Guilty the fellewing Jury MM. Morrison, J.S.Meers VN. Summers ,C.H.Knex,R.P. Craven,W.B.MeLelland,S.H.Garrisen Rl, Cleaninger,J.L.Harriss,S.Gress, W.H. Hunter and C.W. Lackey being sworn and empannelled fer their verdict say that thgy find the defendant net Guilty. AeR.D.W. The plea ef guilty having heretefere bean entered in ti case it is erdered and ad judged by the Court that the defandant pay a fine ef $75,00 and the costs ef this actien.The ferfeiture against E.F. Cass the States witness in this case heretefere a is ordered stricken eut. 2 The defendant by his attorney waves bill ef Indictment and tenders te the State a Plea ef Guilty ef Fercible Trespass which Plea is accepted bythe State. It is erdered and ad judged by the Court that the defendant be cenfined in the Common ‘wail a Iredell County fer the term of Twe years and assigned te the voi CountyCommissioners te work en the Public Reads ef Iredell during the term ef his imprisenment, W.W. Helland States witness called and failed, in this cage ae ae gard hs Larceny, The defendant by his ceunsel Pleas Guilty te Fercible Trespass the charge being changed’ te Fer cible Trespass, The defendant being represented by counsel Pleads Guilty * e ’ ef Fercible Trespass and it is erdered by the Court that he pay inte Ceurt the sum ef $100.00 te be applied first te the costs ef this case, Second $10.00 te the woman Mellie Merrisen and the balance te the Sheol fund. Metion fer Judgement Cent, his Henerable Court takes an adjournment ‘until 9330 A, M. Wednesday May the 2Ist 19I8, tele Sop Judge Presiding, WEDNESDAx MAxy2Ist 1913, te This Hemerable Court meets accerding te adjournment at 9330 A.M. Ne, 2I sie State Va, 4 Me Retailing Plea Guilty Parks Williams be @ State Va, » Refailing Plea Guilty Ne I6 State V Diserderly House, Plea Net Guilty, the fellewing jury T.B. Retailing Plea Net Guilty.The fellewing jury T.B, Lindsay Lindsay, H.B. Bennett,&.Gress,Ne12 Summers, James Moore, H.B.Bennett,S.Gress,Neil Summers,James Moere,D.¥.Lewrance, _ D.B Lewrance,H.N. Jehnston, James Sharpe, *.R.Smith, C.W,Phanr Va. Bek Cleer pe tag Sharpe, ¥.R.Smith,¢.W.Pharr,¢.¥.Lacky G.W.Lacky, being swern and empannelled fer their verdict and C.R.Brewn being sworn and empannelled fer their verdiat ’ say that they find the defendants Guilty.Metion fer judgement say that they find the defendant Net Guilty. as te Laura Gregery.Metien Continued, It is ordered and ad- : judged by the Court bthat Greece Gregory ena Vernice Daniels ao be confined in the Cemmon Jail ef Iredell County for the term a ef feur menths each with leave te the Ceunty Commissioners Vs. Retailing Plea Guilty. Bhe Seliciter in satisfaction ef hins te hire them eut during the term ef their imprisenment, Everite Cerriher dees net pray the judgement ef the Ceurt at this time But pra that the defendant be put under Bend te shew goed behavier, It ig therefere erdered by the Court that the defendant give Béh in the sum ef $1008.00 for his appearance at this Court frem te Va. . . Cruelty te Animals, Censolidated with Ne TO6, te term until January the Ist I9I4 and shew that he has been éf Eugene Gregery. a Anes Gregery Govd Behavier and especially that he has net vielated the a Laws ef this State. Ne 90 State Vs. Larceny, Censelidated with Ne I06. James Gregery Ames Gregery Vs. 5. o. ©. Pl Ni r »B.eLindsa He Be te a Gregory ¢ ea Net Guilty the fellowing jury T.B.L Ye oe Laura Gregory Jim Talferd Bennett, S.Gress, Neil Summers, James Hoore,D.¥.Lewrance eM. Jehnaten, James Sharpe,W.R.Smith,C.W.Pharr,C.*. Leaky © Ne 106 and C.R.Brown.Being swern and empannelled fer their verdict State that they findthe defendant Net Guilty - eo Va. Cruelty te Animals and Larceny and Receiving, Plea Net Guilty ioe gee? the fellowing jury T.8.Lindsay,#.B.Bennett,S Gress, Neil Sum- mers,James Meore,D.¥.Lewrance,H.N. Jehnsten »James Sharpe,W.R. Smith,C.¥,Pharr,C.W.Lackey, C.R.Brown, belng sworn and empan- VS. Larcency. Consolidated with ne. 106, et ee ‘ | sae nelled fer their verdict say they find the defendants Cushey Amos Gregory ‘ , a es It is erdored and adjudged by the Ceurt that Eugene Gregery Jasmes Gregory | | : ; ; o be cenfined én the Commen Jail ef Iredell Ceunty fer the term ; ' | (f IZ months and 4 a he meatinned - erable owt ets: cording te adjournment at 9530 A.M. It is erdered and adjudged by the Court that Devie Gregery be confined in mon Jail ef Iredell Geunty fer the term ef 5 months with ‘leave te the Cosy, 3 ; i a s aiaess is adored stticken eut and it is erdered that Henry McLean and Charles sieners to hire her eut during the term ef her imprisenment, and that Laure ¢ : vcLean hie surity be recegnized in the su be cehfined in the Cemmen Jail ef Iredell County fer the term ef 12 months ey of this Geurt. leave te the County Cemmissioners to hire her eut during the term ef her impr Le guita States Witness in the case ef State Vs. J.A.Davidsen called and failed te answer i ts ordered that he Pay a fine ef $10.00 No 26% | state | ‘e vS. Simple Assault Cent fer the defendant. ; Vs. ' - AWD. Plea Net Guilty the following. jury T.B.Lindsay,J.P.Meere James M.YWeoten J, A. Davidsen T,B, Woodward, JoM. Heward,T.¥.Troutman,C®.R. Brown, JeR. Abernathy,D.¥. Lewrance,H.N. Jehnsten,C.¥.1 Pharr,G.F.Mitchell being swern and empannel- led fer thefr verdict say thoy find the defendant Guilty ef Simple Assault. . a Ne.77 & 78 _Affray Plea Net Guilty the fellewing jury T.B.Lindsay,H. B Bam Morrison. Jim Hall Bennett, S.Gress,Neil Summers, James Meere,D. w.Lewrance HN. Jim Tilford. as & vvave Va. Retailing, Plea Not Guilty The fellewing jury T,.B. Lindsay, J.?.Meore Jehnsten, James Sharpe, W.R. Sith,C.W.Pharr,C.W.Lackey and Gl, Jim Talford 7", B. Woodward, J.M.Howard,T. F.Treutman,C.R. Brown, J.R. Abernathy,D.¥. Brewn being sworn and empannelled fer their verdicy say thal ee Bz Lowrance, H.N. Johnsten,C.W. Pharr, James Sharpe,and G.F.Mitchell being they find the dorm ‘ their verdict say they find the defendartt and the detendant 3 STATE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY t e follewing jury T,.8.Lindsay,J.P.Meere . RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA s a T, F. Troutman, C.R, Brown, Je Re Abernatay,D.W. .?harr,James Sharpe and G.F.Mitchell being This is to certify that page (s) SGgmmaines Naw y’ [Ace S . u) their verdict say they find the defendant Our of PA 1.< 5 GeimmmplermmMimammmipenia, sajudge’ by the Court that the defendant of this volume were missing or blank at the time of microfilming. @ Prison for the term ef Four rears. This def- This Henorable. Court: Aebeaancadgéucnhenl rn Burning. nday ef Next Week and is the first case for No 106 Continued . It 1s erdered and adjudged by the Court that Devie Gregory be confined in mon Jail ef Iredell County fer the term ef 5 menths with leave te the Ceunt rAing te adjournment at 9;30 A.M. |” yee entered against Henry McLean States witness in case of State tickon eut and it is ordered that Henry McLean and Charles sioners te hire her eut during the term ef her imprisenment. and that Laure rileue his surity be recegnized in the _Sumef $50.00 for his appearance at the next tern be cehfined in the Commen Jail ef Iredell County fer the term ef 12 months w leave te the Ceunty Cemmissieners to hire her eut during the term ef her impr aie States Witness in the case ef State Va. J.A.Davidsen called and failed te Ne 29 .5tabe Vie James M.Weeten Merrisen. Hall Tilford. This Henorable answer it is erdered that he pay a fine ef $10.00 Ne 26: Siate « Simple Assault Cent fer the defendant. oe Ve. » AWD Plea Not Guilty the fellowing. jury T.B.Lindsay,J.P.Meere _Affray Plea Net Guilty the fellewing jury T.B.Lindsay,H. B Bennett, S.Gress,Neil Summers, James Mesre,D.¥.Lewrance tl Jehnsten,James Sharpe, W.R.Siith,C.W.Pharr,C.W. Lackey and (eR, Brewn being sworn and empannelled fer their verdicy say that they find the de and the defendant Court takes, ancaéjeurnne JA, Davidsen T.B. Woodward ’ 3.M.Hoeard,T. F, Troutman,C.P. Brown, J.R. Abernathy »DoW. Lewrance,H.N. Johnsten,?. ¥.Pharr,G.F. Mitchell being swern and empannel- lea for the&r verdict say they find the defendant Guilty ef Simple Assault. Neo.77 & 78 State Va. Retailing, Plea Net Guilty The follewing jury T,.B.Lindsay,J.P.Meore Jim Talferd T.B. Woodward, JoM. Howard, T.¥.Troutman,C,R. Brown, J,R. Abernathy,D. ¥. Lowrance, H.N. Johnsten,C.¥.Pharr,James Sharpe,and ¢.F,Mitchell being their verdict say they find the defendant STATE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY e follewing jury T.8.Lindsay,J.P.Meere . RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA T.F.Treutman,¢.R. Brown, J. 2. Abernatay,D.%. ‘ - a oe t This is to certify that page (s) Fe Many PAGES : Pharr,James Sharpe and G.F.Mitchell being their verdict say they fird the defendant Our Of Phe ilove: BP acjudcee vy the court that the defendant of this volume were missing or blank at the time of microfilming, @ Prisen fer the term ef Feur rears. This def- rn Burning. Ne I06 Centinued . Gregery be confined in th ed by the Court that Devie It is erdered and ad judg the term ef 5 months with ‘leave te the County. mon Jail ef Iredell County fer rm ef her imprisenment. and that Laura a ycLean his 8 ire her out during the te ef Iredell County fer the term ef 12 months with hire her eut dur ing the term ef her imprisennent, F sieners te h be cehfined in the Cemmen Jail leave te the County Cemmissieners to it is No 29 No 263 Stabe State - je Simple Assault Gent fer the defendant. noe mes M.Weeten a JA Davidsen Ne 55 ie eC State ‘ aad Vs. Ne.77 & 78 Affray Plea Net Guilty the fellewing jury 7. B.Lindsay;He Be ‘ Bam Morrisen. State Jim Hall Bennett, S.Gress,Neil Summers, James Meers,D. Kk. Lewrance als | Jim Tilferd. feo Va, Jehnsten,James Sharpe, ¥.R.Smith,C. Ww. Pharr ,C.W. Lackey and G2. Jim Talford Brewn being sworn and empannelled fer their verdic® say that they find the defendants Bam Morrisen and Jim Tilford guilty | and the defendant Jim Hall Net Guilty. State Va. Ruby Smith ae ie we i WBS . ‘ a ; * s . * a eS Judge Presiding. zend 1913. i ane ee May the ( sient meets aecerding te adjournment at 9350 A.M. ae of $50.00 he a Pierce is ordered urity be recognized in the . Vie. of this Gourt. 1. Suite States W ardered that he itness in the case ef State Va. oasnenee. entered against Henry McLean States witness in case of State stticken eut and it is erdered that Hen: y McLean and Charles et $50.00 fer his appearance at the next term J.A.Davidsen called and failed te answer pay a fine ef $10.00 SA intel) (Ns - AWD. Plea Net Guilty the fellowing. jury T.B. Lindsay, J.P.Meere T, B. Woodward, J.M.Howard,T. F, Troutman,C.R. Brown, J.Re Abernathy,D.W. Lewrance,H.N. Jehnsten,C.¥.Pharr,G.F.Mitchell being sworn and empannel- ted fer thetr verdict say they find the defendant Guilty ef Simple Assault. : Retailing, Plea Net Guilty The follewing jury T,.B.Lindsay,J.P.Meore T, B. Woodward, J.M.Heward,T.F. Troutman,C.R.Brewn, J.R. Abernathy,D.¥. Leowrance,H.N. Johnsten,C.W. Pharr, James Sharpe ,and G.F.Mitchell being swern and empannelled fer their verdict say they find the defendant “4 Guilty en beth Counts. * 4 Arsen,Plea Not Guilty, the follewing jury T.8.Lindsay,J.P.Meere. . F.Treutman,C.R. Brown, J. R, Abernatay,D.W. Mitchell being T.B.Weedward, J.M.Howard,T. Lewrance,H.N. Johnston,¢.¥. Pharr, James Sharpe and G.F. sworn and empannelled fer their verdict say they find the defendant ad by the Ceurt that the defendant This deof- Guilty, It is erdered and ad judge be cenfined in the State Prison fer the term ef Feur rearse endant is sentenced fer Barn Burning. ket is set fer trial en Menday ef Next Week and is the first case for » . All cases on the Civil Decket from and after Ne 8 and including Ne 8 are set fe en Menday of Next Week. Né 1. Wesbey Redman Vs. Themas Dacens. Ne 41 State Va. Arthur Mayberry Lester Holcomb Rebert Greas Nok@bF 108 State Va. C.C. Parks No 60 Cent inked. Affray, Plea Net Guilty the fellewing jury M.M. Merrisen, J, Meore, L.N.Summers,C.H.Knex,R.L.Cleaninger,W.B.McLelland, S.H.Garrisen,R. P.Craven,R.A.Mentgemery, R. A. Slaleck,W. i, Hunter and C.W.Lackey being swern_and empannelled fer their verdict say they, find the defendants Gullty ef Simple Assault.[t is ordered and adjudged by the Ceurt that Arthur Mayberry paya fine ef $1.00 and B/2 the cests and that Lester Helcomb pay 1/2 of the cests.and that Rebert Gress be discharged. Retailing, Plea Guilty Retailing. Plea Guilty Retailing.Plea Guilty Retailing. Plea Guilty. Retailing, JS Plea Net Guilty, the Following jury M.M. - aX Sam ere, +8 gan By. wh + 9a -Moore, L.N.Summers,¢. +H. Knox,R.L. Cleaninger, ¥.B S.H.Garrisen,R.P, craven SoReteLiand 8.0. HtozoLeent and C.%,Lacky es swern and - say that ban Morrisen, Ne 52 State VS» ames Monroe White i Vs Jake Shuferd, A.W.D.W. A verdict ef Guilty having heretofore been rendered in this case, It is erdered and adjudged by the Ceurt that the defend- ant pay a fine ef $5@00 (five dollars) and 1/2 ef the cests ef this Case. Larceny Plea Net Guilty the fellewing jury M.M.Merrisen,J.S.Mere L.N.Summers ,C.H.inex,J.T.Holland,¥.B,McLelland,S.H.Garrigen,R.P. Craven,R.A.Blaleck,R.A.Mentgemery,¥.H.Hunter and C.W.Lacky. being swern and empannelled fer their verdict say that they find the def- endant Guilty. It is erdered and adjudged by the Ceurt that the defendant be cenfined in the Cemmen Jail ef I redell County fer the term ef 10 months and is assigned te the Ceunty Commissioners te be worked en the Public Reads ef Iredell Ceunty during the term ef his imprisenment, the payment of the cests. A.W.D.Ws Plea Guilty as upen Bill Fe i suspended on Geph Sleep and Beb Sleep States wit- ness” in this case called and faiJed it is erdered bythe Ceurt that they pay a fine ef $25.00 each and be net allowed te preve attendance in this case. Larceny and Capias. W Williams called and failed Judgement Ni #c1,Si Fa RELGAEFEBI EERE AD Capias Not te issue if he re- news his Bend within thirty days. Centinued fer the Defendant. FRIDAy MAx 23, 1915. This Henerable Ceurt meets accerding te adjeurnment at 9:30 A. M. Ne, 69 State vs. Retailing. Caplas. Jack Mergan. The fine ef $25 each heretefere entered aginst Ceph ana Beb Sleep, State's Witnesses inthis case “is hereby erdered Jake Shuferd, strickén ‘eut. vs. J. A, Davidsen, As 8. Uw We Plea net guilty. The fellewing jury: T. B., Lindsey, J, Ps Meere, T. B, Weodward, T. F, Treutman, C. R, Bhewn, J. R, Abernathy, v. W, Lewrance, H. N. Jehnsen, ©. ¥. Pharr, James Sharpe an@ G. M. “Mitchell being swern and empanelled fer their verdict sa they find the defenaant net guilty. vs, Ss. A. 8 Fester. A plea ef guilty having heretefere been rendered the blew struck by the defendant was under serieus a ¥ dy witheut malice, and that he has already expendea the ef Thirty Seven ana 25/100 peliars fer the benifit ef — Pete Helland, whe was stricken, the Ceurt ad judges that. a fine ef Twenty Five Dellars and the cest and defendant Pay this action. “POD ae DOI er ee, » and it appearing te the Ceurt in this case, that State V8~ udivan Kerley. s Larceny. Plea net Guilty. The follewing jury; F, M. Abernathy, 7. E. Merrisen, R. A, Blayleck, Ernest Plyler, W. J, Stimpsen, Ollie Shaver, W. 4H. Hunter, Cc. W, Lackie, S. H, Garrisen, C. H. Knex, L. N. Summers and T. F. Treutman being swern and empanelled rer their WO AP eet to Be Ra Poncho tend of Beng camprceen nd Ne. 26 State v8. J, A, Davidsen,. Simple assault. J, A. Davidsen, C. E. Daniels, R. V. Brawley ". 2. Slean, and J. A, Wise hereby fer a geed, sufficient and valuable censideratien cenfess judgment te the State ef Nerth Carelina in the sum ef One Theusand Dellars, jeintly and severally,’ te be levied ef their geeds, chattles, lands and tenants, This cenfessien ef: judgment is upen cenditien that the defendant J, A. Davidsen in a case of State vs. J. A. Davidsen en Iredell Superier Ceurt Decket, shall fer @ peried ef Twe yearskkeep the peace towards all persens and especially shall keep the peace teward hia wife » and be ef geed behavier tewards her and all ether persens. “Te the end that the Ceurt may knew whether he ebserves these cenditiens te appear at each and every Criminal Ceurt fer twe years and shew that he hi. been ef geod behavier tewards his wife and all ether persens and that he 1s keeping the peace, out abeve this judgment is te be abselute and executien is te issue against him and. his oe ees. If he faile te se cemply with this erder ef the Ceurt as set Said sum ef meney te be collected and turned ever te the Schaeel fund, his ) Gerifenaion, we and- each ef us, severally and joint: a We? rn Ne. 26 State vs. J. A. Davidsen. The defendant with censent ef cenfessien ef judgment as set eut in the recerd ef his pehavier tewards ».1 persens and especially tewards his w for iwe years accerding te the terms ef the judgment here rendered, the judgment of imprisenement heretefere entered against his is stricken eut and the judgment is that he pay fine ef $25 and the cest of this actien. The repert ef the Grand Jury 4s erdered entered upen the recerd, No. 109 State vs. Miles Williams Laura Gregery. F. &e Ae Plea net guilty. The fellewing jury; .T. 8. Lindsey, J. P. Meere, T. B. Weodward, J, M, Howard, T. Fy Cc. R. Brewn, J. R. Abernathy, D. ¥. Lewrance, H. N. Jehnsen, Cc. W. Pharr, James Sharpe and ¢, F. Mitchell being swerm empanelled fer their verdict say they find the defendant guilty. Judgment suspended as te Laura Gregery. It és ordered | Ceurt that the defendant Miles Williams be cenfined te Cemmon Jail ef Iredell Ceunty fer the term ef 14 menths and is assigned te werk en the public reads ef said Ceunty during tt term ef his imprisenment, vs. Calvin Criffir. A, % Ds F. Plea net guilty. coutman, C. R. Brewn, J. R. Abernathy, D. Jehnsen, C. 4+ Pharr, James Sharpe and. G., Fe, sworn and empanelled fer their verdict say defendant guilty. Ita lered 1 Btate VB8e enree Dishman 2, Yeiener It appearing te the Ceurt in this case frem an affidavit that tendat B. E Weisner has expended Fifty Feur Dellars fer the capture ef defendant efe “oe nishman. It is adjudged that the State recever Judgment against the defen- that the bend for Tew Hundred Dellars, which is remitted te the payment of ant; wenty Five Dellars te be applied, first te the cest ef the sci fa and second, « the plance te the sbhooel fund. Ne, 81 State VSe Galled and failed. Judgmtnet nici sci fa Earlie Meese Retailing. and capias. No. 86 State vs. Tarlie Meese Jane Sewers. Retailing. Earlie Meese called and fialed. Judgment nici sci fa and capias. Case continued. A.W. D. W. = Plea guilty. Judgment suspended upen the payment ® ef the cest ef this case. Ne. 61 State V8. Al Patterson. A. vs. Sherrill Templeton. v8. Dock Bailey. Vs. Isaac Rash. Ne. 73 State vs. Rebt Nany Ne. Se State v8. Green Barkley Ne. 96 State v8. Coley Hamlet 111 Fex ster Jefferson. yD. W. Defendant called and failed. “Judgment nic and capias. Larceny. Defendant called and failed. Judgment fa and capias. Retailing. Plea net guilty. The fellewing jury: B. Lindsay J. P. Meore, T. B. Weodwrad, J. M. Howard, .° 7? F, Troutman, C. R. Brewn, J. R, Abernathy, D. W. Lowrance; N. Jehnsen, C. W. Pharr, James Sharpe, G. F. Mitchell being sworn and empanelled fer their verdict say they find the defendant guilty. C.C,. Parks. Mfg Liquer. Centinued. Defendant required te give pend in the sum ef $500. Judgment suspended, Abandenment. Defendant called and failed. | sci fa and capias. Ae WW. D. ©, Continued, bond in the sum of $50 each, A.Me Retailing. the Plea ef Guilty having heretefere been rendered and the Ceurt: having effered this persen the eppertunity te pay a fine ef $100.00 and give @ Bend in the sum of $100.00 made payable te the State,the defendant says that he is net able -te de so,and it appearing that he has been indicted and cenvicted twice before fer Retailing Liquer,the judgement ef the Ceurt is that the said defendant he imprisened in the Cemmen Jail ef Ire- @ell Ceunty fer the term ef 90 days . The Ceurt gives the Ceunty Cemmissieners the priviledge, if in the judgement ef the Ceunty Physician that the defendant is able to werk,te assign him te the Public Roads.If he is net able te werk the sentence ef the Geurt is that he remain in Jail fer 90 days. It appearing te the Ceurt in this case tha. the defendant 1a8 never heretefere been upen the Criminal Decket charged with vie- lating the law,and that he veluntarilu surrendered in this ¢ase pleading Guilty and cernfesses nis fault,and promisés the Ceurt net te vaelate the law any mere; It is adjudged that he pay a fine ef $100.00 and the cests,and “enter date a Bond in the sum ef $100.00 te appear twelve menths hence and shew that he has net vielated the law. ~ ‘ It appearing te the Ceurt that the @ofenéant is a young man ‘hie surrenders ae confesses and preihisesses net te t ef the Ceurt ise The he be Tinea f09 co * ey BS ee Ae) No 37 State state lute i dered ne ae on . we coe Om stating, Defendant Pleads Guilty. Judgememt suspended upen the pay- Sci Fa Judgement avselute 18 renee se and rm és | ) : is od : t ef the cests. JA mela. upen the payment ef the cests ef the Sci Fa and the ce ¢,C. Parks. men Setreen the original cases Numbers 21,22,and 25. Vs. Neo 36 ° «state ee 3 : | Sci Fa. Sci Fa is dismissed. & 3 8. It appearing te the Ceurt in this case,that this is the ’ J, A. Davidson. «B® CI.8. Boye effense against the defendant,and the Court Peing ia doubt thet er er net he is engaged in the buisiness from the evidence funiam Xe 56 Civil Calender. ished the Court,the defendant is fined $100.00 and the costs wif Cbsen Barkley od til Wednesday 9;30 A.M. May the 28th required to give Bend in the sum ef $100.00 te appear 12 month Vs. Sentsnyet ean hence and shew that he has not vielated the Liquor Law, es Wartha Barkley Ne 15 3tate and Annie Vs. Retailing the Judgement ef the Court vaacarei he pay @ fine of ee ces be Colpriniae. Reme Reninger Jim Talford and the cests ef this action 3 «Bove 16 Ne 7 . e 78 oe State and Lizzie McCulleugh State ) oe Vs Continued by cansent. Va. Retailing Judgement suspended upen the payment ef the ¢ ; ee Less Weaver Jim Talford. 4 ma er a ot _ 3 Wesley Redman State M Vs, Open fer Judgement. Vs. Affray Judgement suspended upen the payment ef one-half * Temas Baceng Jim Talferd, a Cests. He having been fined in No 77. ~ @ Ne 2 Ne 67n ve ? . Cetten Manufacturing Sales Ce. State 3 Vs. Cempremised. Retailing Judgement ef the Ceurt is that the defendan Deck Bailey ef $25000( twenty five and the costs ef this action, — ., Ne 80 Catrmoe: : re a ey z : i pid t i Selpgs “State Seema 8 Cie MEN yO nes a, CBR ihe Gen Anued. ee: , . au wee a i. abe SS fon oy ee Rte ie Ne 8 R.A.Gaither Vs. Geerge M. Carson No 9lza State Vs. Early Meese Jane Sewers, This Henerable Ceurt takes a 2 7h: -risen,R.P.Craven,H.C. Bennett, W. i. Hunt P, and 6, : = Pharr. being sworm and empannelled@ fer their ve that they find the defendant Early Meese Guilty defendant Jane Sewers Net Guilty. Ts *.4 Adjuernment until 10:00 A.M. Menday May 26th 1973, Ltd hae JUDGE PRESIDING. onday Mag the 26th T9I3.. : nis Henerable Ceurt meets accoriiing te adjeunnment at 9:30 A.M, : J.M.Deaten High Sheriff ef Iredell Ceunty returns inte epen Ceurt the names ef the fellewt: ood and lawful men te serve as jurers fer the secend week ef this term te-wit; {11 Nerriss,¥,8,Turner,J.M.Auther,J.G.Pattereen,W.M. Walker,W. A. Wineceff, J.H.McElwee,Francis ore, Ce TeMcNeely, Jessie Lippard, W.L.Osetwalt,E.L.Treutman,C.A. Themas »¥.B.Turner,R.L. Kander, i, Oliphant, J.X. Nance, (. C.Heneyeutt, R.M.Lazehby,W.B.Geodin, ),F, Pane,M.P.Templeten,W. i. ilhelm, .G.Pattersen,and W.M.Wilhelm are excused fer the tera, le 20 5, Holland . s, Case is centinued fer the defendant Because ef cenflict ef Ceurt oH. Clinard ef Ceunsel, This case is erdered te be placed en the Civil Caleader the first case en Mendays Calender of the secend week ef the next te term. @ 21. «L, Bane . 8, Centinued under fermer erder, ames W.Brewn, le 22 8. Open fer Judgement. vanes W, Brews le 29, bavidsen Lumber Co, pee ‘ Open fer final Judgement. bert A, Gaither ® 30, -T. Stimpson * * + Centinued fer the Plaintiff. ie 39, M. Winecerr 3 , In this case Ceuncil fer plaintiff suggest the den th ef the plat ‘baff,and asks that leave be allewed the adninistrater of the plaintiff to be made party plaintiff and amend complaint. OEE Ne 40, 8 C.C.Tharpe 4, Gaither Vs. . It appearing te the Court that the case has been setthed yy The follewing jury Will Nerriss,J.M.Suther,W.M.Walker,W.A. Virginia Spann Cempremise the action is dismissed with cest te be taxed i; ge MeCarson Wineceff,Frances Meore,C.T.McNeoly, Jessie Lippard,¥.L.Ostwalt g wet the Clerk eft the Ceurt.and paid by the partics as they my E.L. Treutman,C,A.Themas,M.B.Turner,and R.L.Kinder being e agree upen statement as te their agreement te th e Clerk, “—" and empamnelled fer their verdict say.Trial centinued . When this statement is made the Clerk is authorized te tex @ ever until te-morrew, the cests against the. party whe ag-ees te pay. the costs, No 41. S.M.Geodman . Reatiling,the jury heretefore rendered a verdict ef Guilty in Vs. Centinued by censent. marly Moose. this case. Metien fer Judgement. Metien Continued, Seuthern Express Co/ The case te remain en the decket the defendant recegnized in No 56. the sum ef $100.00 fer her appearance at the next term Green Barkley ef this Court. Vs. This case cening @n at this term the plaintiff submits BB, .. cesepaple Gaunt chaeeex@n etd SOURRMOD hic WHh dh Bi A0e be Mae TUR Rd hes MRe eh GRATE ERE 6 ce Martha Barkley to a Nen Suit Judgement te be handed up fer Signature, Judgement for cests against the plaintiff te de taxed : PREBS LPH AERA PBF Hpen call ef the Summens decket it is erdered that in each and every case thereen the by the Clerk. Plaintiff is allewed thirty days te file cemplaint as ef this term and the defendant are Vs. State takes Nel Pres. llewed thirty days thereafter te answer er demur as ef this term except in such cas ¢ Green Barkley here some special erder is taken er judgement by default is rendered. In thea cases Ne 52. here complaints have already benn filed the defendant are allewed thirty days frem the iE, Remy xpiration ef this ferm in which te file answer er demur, Vs Open fer Judgement. his Honerable Ceurt Sekés and adjeunment until 9:30 A.M. Tuesday May e/th 1913, The fellewing jury; Will Nerriss,J.M.Suther, WsM."al™ Judge Presiding. Edgar Warlick W.A.Wineceff, Frances Meere, C.T.McNeely, Jessie *4?F Jaceb Cehen & Sens Ce, Ne 17 H.0O.Steele Vs. W.L.Ostwalt, E.L.Treutman , C.A,Themas, M. B. Turners ir and R.L.Kinder, being swern and empannelle ¢@ fer ” verdict say that they find the issues submitted te Sas a3 fellows, ; I Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff ,and if s@,in what ameunt? Answer- $90.09 &, Is the plaintiff entitled to-the -posséasi®H "et the engine afi@ saw ith Compaaint? Answer~ yes, 5. Is the plaintiff indebted to the defendant en his alledged ceunter- in what amount? | *, Answer- By Censente- $10.09 TUESDA1 MAY ats 1913. This Henerable Court meets accerding te ad jeurnment at 9:30 A. M. Ne. @ R. A. Gaither vs Thés case was centinued ever frem yesterday. Trial ad M. Carsen ef the case is resuned, Centinued ever until Lemerrow. Ne. SXALB Lee albertsen. V3. . . , Cempremised. Jehn A. Rankin. tatesville Knitting Cempany. Centinued under fermer T. Hellar. Jentinued under former erder. Ye. 19 S. J. Helland V8. Nathan Me-risen. Cenitinued, Ne. 47 SUnien Salt Company VS. K. Merrisen and Sens Ce. Centinued. Tm all cases on the State Decket wh | } ; ere def \ it is erdered by the Ceurt that caplases issue ae a est as Gareenedeseme bf te the Ceunty In which defendant may Nerth carelina, Superier Ceurt tredell Ceunty. May Term 1913. 3. ¢. Henley VS Jaceb Cehen Seus and Ce., JUDGMENT. and American Surety Comapany of New xork. This catse coming en te be heard and being heard befere lils Hener, 3. F. Long, Judge; and it appearing that the plaintiff and the defendants have compremised this sckan’ by Toe defendant agreeing te pay plaintiff the sum ef One Hundred and Twenty Five Dellars: | It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the intatsetiseenved ef the defendant and the American Surety Cempany of New york, suety on defendants bond, the sum of One Hundred and Twenty Five Dellars, tegether with the cests of this action te be taxed by the Clerk.,ef this Ceurt. Be Be Gh eng, Judge Presig@ing. North Carelina, Superier Ceurt Iredell County May Term 1913. State and Annima Swink vs. Rome Renegar. This cause ceming en to be heard at this term ef the Ceurt befere His iiener, B, F, Long, Judge, and being heard, and it appearing te the Court that the parties plaintiff and defendant have cempremised the matters at issue in this actien, the plaintiff agreeing te accept, and the defendant agreeing te pay the sum of Ninety Five Dellars in full settlement ef her claim and all cests ef action; and it further CCA that said sum ef Ninety Five Dellars has been paid and accepted by Y a * ‘ : It is, therefere, censidered and adjudged that the plaintiff pay the Costs ef this actien as taxed by the Clerk ef this Ceurt and that the defendatn 60 witheut day, B. F. Leng, Judge Presiding. This Henerable Ceurt takes asn adjeurnment until 9:30 4. M. Wednesday Way 28, 1913. Judge Presiding. WEDNESDAr MAxy 28, 1915. is Henerable Court mects accerding te adjeurnment al 9:30. ante | r vs. Ne. & Be ae yorris Curley. Larceny. In this case the jury having recommended clemency R, A. Gaither a te the Ceurt, but in a form that ceuld net be carried out, the ik Ceurt permits the charge to be changed from Larcency te forciable jury heretofere sworn and empanelled fer their verdict trespass, and te this plea the defendant by his Ceunsel pleads say they find the issues submitted te them as follows: ; guilty. the defendant causse the presecution and the arrest of the plaintiff . It appearing to the Court that the defendant has paid Complaint? the cest in the case and deposited One Hundred Dollars witha the Answer: No. Clerk to be applied to the School Fund, the Court witholds wed judgment and suspends the same and required the defendant to was the prosecution and arrest without probable cause enter into bond in the sum of One Hundred Dollars to appear at this Ceurt 12 months hence and show that he has been of geod Unanswered, behavior. The verdict rendered is stricken out. and arrest malicieus as alleged? North Carolina, Superier Unanswered, Irzdell County. May Term ; : Lee Albertson, Plaintiff fourth: - Did the plaintiff agree and consent to the termination of said criminal vs. action, with the defendant, by a Nol Pros, of the same in settlement of differences John A, Rankin, Executor of ¥. W. between plaintiff and defendant as alleged in the answer: - Rankin, Jehn A. Rankin individually Answer: - 1€8. y fourth: - What amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled te recever of the This cause ceming en to be heard and being heard before His Henor defendant? and Frank A, Rankin, defendants. : B. F. Leng, Judge, and it appearing to the Court that the parties plaintiff Answer: Unanswered, ani defendants have cempromised the matters at issue in this action, the defen- dants agreeing to pay the plaintiff and the plaintiff agreeing te accept. the sun of Two Hundred vellars in full satisfaction of all matters in dispute; It is ther€fere, considered and adjydged that the plaintiff reccver a‘ ef the defendant the $ { i Dellars tegether with the cost of this Pestal Telegraph Company. The follewing jury; ¥. J. Oliphant, J. %. Nantz sum of Two Hundred De 7 ‘ action te be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. C. Honeycutt, R. M., Lazenby, 4. B, Geedin, E . Leng A. Hoover, WW. J. Stimpsen, J. L. Waugh, ¥. Cc. Meer, Ge» a. 3 Stee oe ding. E. Turner, J, W. Heath and Ira Feard.being sworn st Presiding and empanelled fer their verdict say samy 22uz 228 : This Hon 5 ‘ a We ‘ 1913. ixs Trial continued over until tenerret: - orable Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 A. M. Thursday May 29, Neo. 44 J. S. Caldwell Continued for the plaintiff en the acceunt ef his sick- — oan ai Z * a ness, It being agreed that the evidence ef Mr. Pitts, ae wes . : ae fer the defendant, to be taken at this tera eee oe Judge Presiding. a stenegrapher, but witheut a commissioner, and te be use fe . rape Barger Bros. as evidence for the defendant upen the trial at any sub ; Aerie . : quent term of Ceurt, This a; beth sides to the action. greenany mame y rhe 4 oe t THURSDAx MAx 297 1915. This Henorable Court meats according te adjournment at 9;30 A, Ne, 18 Internatienal Waste Cempany vs. Bloomfield Manufacturing Cempany. Continued, Ne. <8 Fill Simonten VS. Delia Simonton. Centinued fer the plaintiff. James Church, In this case Cennsel fer the defendant meves that the be continued upen the infermatien that his client is sick, The motion is granted provided the defendant files a certificate of a decter befere the adjournment ef ceurt se ting ferth that he is unable to be here en acceunt ef sickness. Unless this is dene by the defendant, it is adjudged that he pay the cost ef the term. Continued for the defendant. Plaintiff's ceunsel at this term moves te dismiss the appeal ef the defenaant on th e greund that the same is net breught preperly inte this ceurt and is net rightfully en the decket. This motien is centhued. Burke vs. Centinued, No. 32 Db. B. Heneycutt om Centinued fer the plaintiff as upen affidavit a filed, SOuthe#n Railway Cempany r e, 1 areola ‘Needs. 9 vs. pstal Telegraph Company. The jury heretefere sworn and empanelled fer their verdict say they fina the issues submitted te them as fellows: rirst:- Did the aefenaant negligently fail te deliver the telecram as alleged n the cemplaint? Answer: res. ,cond:- Weula plaintiff have attended the funeral of his mether had the telegram peen delivered in @ reasenable time? Answer: yes. Mhird:- Notwithstanding the negligence ef the defendant, ceula the plaintiff by he exercise ef ordinary diligence have attended his mother's funeral? Answer: res eurth:- Did the plaintiff cempremise and settle his cause ef actien against tne Mestern Unien Telegraph Cempany as alleged in the answer? Answer: ees as embodiea in the written paper-writing markea Bxhibit A" Pifth:- What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitlea te recever of the defendakt? Answer: Nene. le, 31 Frank Simmends vs, . °, Johnsen. The fellewing jury: Will Nerris, J. M. Suther, 7%. l. Walker, W. A. Wineceff, Francis Meore, C. T. McNeely, Jesse Lippard, ", L. Ostwalt, E. L. Treutman, C. A. Themas, IM. B. Turner ana 2. L. Kinder being sewrn and empanellea rer their verdict Say they fina the issues submittea te them as fellows: i] st. Did the defendant execute the centract ef sale Exhibit “a” as alleged in the eaplaint? ~ Answer: Yes. end, Has the Plaintitf cempliea with the terms er said centract et sale en his part? Answer: ee ee MM. What Smeunt, if any, is aue the plaintiff e the geteneant “ the palance ef “Ne Purchase Price ef the ovens furnished under saia centract ef sale. pe Mb Answer: $674.86 with interest frem July lst, 19lc. B AE pean, if any, 1s aefenaant entitiea te recever en his cennter-clains R. B. Adams vs. Geerge Gibsen vu, N. Gibson. The fellewing jury, "ill Nerris, J. M. Suther, ¥. M. Walker, W. A. Winecerf, Francis Meore, C. T. McNeely, Jesse Lipparp a ", L. Cstwalt, FE. L. Treutmarn, ©. A. Themas, M. B. Turner ang 2. L. Kinder peing swern and empaneliea rer their verdict Say ape pe the find the lesues submitted te them as fellows:: : First. Are the defendants indebted te the plaintiff if se, hew much? Answer: 174.48 Secend:- Has the summens and warrant ef attachment in this case been duly served on the defendandants? Answer: 16s. Third; - What ameunt, if any, has the garnishee Jas. A. Hartness, Clerk ef the Superin Ceurt, in his hands belenging te the defendants er either ef them? Answer: $339.42. Heneycutt vs. Seuthern Ry. Ce., In this case, J, Celumbus Hebbs, a witness subpened by beth Ssldes was called and failed te answer. It is erdered that he AM. pay a fine ef $25. Judgment ni ci sci fa. th Carelina, Im the Superier Ceurt Ner reédell Ceunty. May Term 1913, >» A, Gaither, Plaintiff V8. eo. K. Carsen, defendant. JUDGMENT, This cause ceming en te be heard at this term ef the Ceurt ef Iredell eunty befere His Hener, B. F. Leng, Judge Presiding and a jury, and being heard, and che jury having returned their verdict in faver ef the defendant, and against the laintiff as set eut in the recerd: It is, therefere, censidered and adjudged that the plaintiff R. A. aither take nething by this actien, and that the defendant ge witheut day and ecever the cest ef this actien te be taxed by the Clerk ef this Ceurt against the plaintiff R. A. Gaither, and surety en his presecutien bend, B. F. Leng, Judge Presiding. lerth Carelina, Superier Court Iredell County. May Term 1913. J. 3S. Caldwell, plaintiff vs. Barger Bres, defendants ORDER OF REFERENCE. It appearing te the Ceurt that the parties plaintiff and defendant have agreed te refer this case te Derman Thempsen, Esq., te take and state the acceunt between said parties, and it further appearing that said parties have agreed that said referee shall hear said matter en June 24th 1913 in the tewn ef Meeresville, N. C. "itheut futher netice te either party. It is, therefere, censidered and adjudged that Derman Thempsen, Esq., be, and he is hereby appeinted referee te take and state the entire acceunt between the plaintiff and the defendant, hearing said case en June 24th 1913 in the tewn ef Yeeresville : oC. and en such ether day er days as he may set. Said referee will nr “Pert his findings ef facts and cenclusiens ef law separatly and shall file said repert te the next term ef Iredell Superier Ceurt. Bae Be: DOB Appreveds Zeb, ve Turlingten \Werney fer plaintirr, Nerth Carelina, Superior .Faye* i ef paipar MAY JO, 1915. May Term 1915. Iredell Ceunty. erable Court meets aceerding te adjournment at 9 A. M. cok ee This Hen ; D. B. Heneycutt, plaintiff é€ vs. Stat Judgment. : H. Mayhew, defendant and Se chas Bickas. C. C. W. Plea guilty. It is erdered by the Ceurt that he Ww. Leng surety en bend. 5 ay a fine ef $30 and the cest ef this actien te be taxed by the This cause cening en te be heard and being heard befere His Honer 8, 7, . * y th Clerk. Leng, Judge presiding, and it appearing te the Ceurt that the parties have Cempremised the matters invelved in this action defendant agreei:g te pay and the plaintiff a n : 4 and sati Ida J. Christy agrceing te accept the sum ef Sixty Three Dellars in full settlement and satisfaction a V8. ef all matters at issue in this action; Christy. The fellewing jury; Will Nerris, ¥. E. Turner, J. M. Suther, It ig therefere censidered and adjudged that plaintiff recever ef the W. M. Walker, ¥. A. Wineceff, Francis Moore, C. T. McNeely, de‘endant and J. WwW. Leng surety en his bend the sum ef Sixty Three Dellars, tegether Jesse Lippard, WwW. L. Ostwalt, E. L. Treutman, C. A. Thomas, with the cests ef this actien te be taxed by the Clerk of this Ceurt. and M. B. Turner being swern and empanclled fer their verdict B. F. Leng, Judge Presiding. say they find the issues submittted to them as feollews: a appro vea: Were the plaintiff and defendant intermarried as alleged in the cemplaint? Zeb. V. Turlingten Answer: yes. Atterney fer plaintiff 4. L. Starr and H, P. Grier 2, Did the defendant abanden the plaintiff and live in fernicatien and adultery as Atterneys fer the defendant. alleges in the omplaint? Answer: Ys. This Henerable Court takes an ad jeurnemtn until 9 A. NM. Friday May 30, 1913. erd, Has the plaintiff been a benifide resident ef the State of Nerth Carelina fer two years prier to the cemmencement of this action. fh pv - @ Answer, yes. € Jugge Presiding. Did the defendant cemmit fernicatien and adultery as alleged? Answer: Yes. pr. F, L. Sharpe v4 The fellewing jury, Will Nerris, ¥. E. Turner, J. . o . * w ” " . ae yh y < w s) Ce Suther, W. M. Walker, YW. A. Wineceff, Francis Meore, ncald Furniture Company, 7 ; McNeely, Jesse Lippard, %. L. Ostwalt, E. L. Treutman, C. a. Themas and M. B, Turner being swern and empanelled fer their verdict say they find the issues submitted te them as fellews: Ig the def endant indebted te the plaintiff, and if se in what ameunt? Answer: Yes- One Hundred and Ninty Twe Dollars ({19<.90) Annie Clark : Annie The fellewing jury: Will Nerris, J. M. Suther, ¥. M Walker, V8. . ". A. Wineceff, Francis Meere, ©. T. MoNeely, Jesse Lippard, Frank Clark ‘eet ™ vy, L. Ostwalt, E. L. Treutman, ©. A. Themas, M, B. Turner, and 8. L. Kinder being swern and empanelled fer their verdict Bay, Jurer withdrawn and a mistrial had. ‘ or Ernest Stewart. 30 days allewed defendants t» answer or demur to cemplaint, ee Dh ee Peg a lantation Cempany ontinued. a a emen en Company T 7 L. Alexander. Continued. said BPapniture Cempany. Inthis case it is agreed by ceunsel fér both sides that the Court may sign iud ,e rn t in) + me y 3 ? judgment any time within ferty days, and any where the Ceurt may be in the State, wi + } } file the same with the Clerk. Permission being reserved te parties en beth si@es te file any exceptiens, io. ce ¢ mo an en y y er to make any motien after the same is passed upon and entered upen the record. A 7 CO + Qe i11L”N o me of ¢ 2 } All of these things may be dene as of term witheut prejudice te either si: 5. State VS. v . ame h i.e Williams ea ‘Sentence ef 14 months te jail heretefere entered in this case soreeens reduced te le menths and he is assigned te werk on * Pp ¢ reads of said county during the term ef his imprisenment. State ee V8. Xenophen Lensferd The fine of 575.00 heret ° im’ 3 ord reduced te $50, fere impesed in this case is North Carolina, } In the Superior Court. ) Iredell County. ) May Term, 1913, Frank Simmons ) -vS-_ J U-D:4 WBE. We. Se piiie.5 This cause coming on to be heard at the Way Term, 1923, of ‘the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor, Be. F. Long, Juage Presiding, and a jury, and being heard and the jury having answered the issues as set out in the record; It is therefore considered and adjudzed that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of $545.56 and the costs of this action to be taxea@ by the Clerk of this Court. It is’ further considered and adjudged that this judgment is a specific lien upon the bake ovens described in the vleadings in this ease and that all rishts and equities of redenption of the defendant in, said property be and the same are hereby forever foreclosed, andi it is adjudged further that if the defendant fail to pay this judenent on or before the 10th day of June, 1913, that then and in that event J. %. Lewis who is appointed Commissioner of the :Court for that purpose, shall expose said property to sale at public auction for cash after piving twenty days flotice of said sale in the manner and way provided for the sale of personal property under mortgage and report his actions in the prenises to the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County. Be F. Long. Judge Presiding. No 0 rth Carolina, ) Superior Court. I redell County. ) May Tern, 1915. Js i. Seago |) cake JUDGMEN ) ) Pannie Gray. : This cause coming on for hearing at this térm of the Court by consent, It is considered and adjudged that Fannie “ray recover of ‘the Plaintirf J. 1. do Searo and his surety ¥. R. Sloan the sum of Thirty-Five lars and the cost of the action to he taxed by the Clerk. , B. F. Long. North Carolia, In the Superior Coyrt. =r m Iredell County. May Term, 1913. . Le C. Caldwell and HE. S. Millsaps, Assicnees of Commercial National Bank v8 %. Ae Summers. : ‘This cause coring on to be heard at the May Tem, 1913, of the Suverior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Be #. Long, Judee Presidint, ani it appearing to the Court that the summons and warrant of attachnent in this ease has been duly served on the defendant in the manner and way required by law, and it appearing further that the date of the levy of the attachment on the real catate of the defendant is January 2lst, 1913, and that said levy was duly recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County in Judgment Locket 13, page 267, and it appearing further that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs on a note under seal executed to the Comneretal. National Ra Bank and assi-ned to the plaintiffs in this action, that the amount due on said note is 3609.00 .osether with the interest on the same from the 2lst day of January, 19135, until paid; It is therefore considered and adjudsed by the Court that the plaintiffs recover judgrent of the defendant for the sum of $609.00 together with the interest on said sum from the 21st day of January, 1913, until paid. It is further considered and adjudged that said sum is @ lien on the real ostate of the defendant levied upon as above set forth, from the 2lst day of January, 1913, and a lien on the personal property of the defendant levied upon by the Sheriff of Iredell County fron the é axoof Said levy same being the 25th day of January, 1913. Bb. P. Long. Judge Presiding North Carolina, ) Iredell County. Sate Boat, JUDGMENT, ) ) vs . J. A. Williams. ) This cause coming on to de heard at this term of the upon the pleadings, and no answer ‘being *iled, it 1s ordered by the ‘hat the sale of the personal property embraced in sata cause and in Claim and delivery action be and the same is hereby affirmed, and that plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of Forty Five Dollars, cost of the eotion. to be taxed by the Grex of the Court. B forth Carolina, ) Superior Court, ) Iredell County.) May Term, 1913. A. P. »igman, plaintiff ~vs- ) JUDGHENT, Urs. E. F. Sigman, ita) This enuse coning on to be heard and being heard before His Honor Be ¥. Long Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the court that the matters iewneae and at issue in this action have heen compromised by the parties, on the following terms and conditions, to-wit: Defendant is to execute.and deliver to plaintiff a good and sufficient deed, with usual covenants of seizen and warranty, conveying to him in fee sinple Thirty Acres of the lands mentioned and designated in the complaint; said fhirty Acres to be run,.or cut, off the Vest end of said tract of land by running a line South from a point on G. %. Combes line to a point in the line of _. formerly Mrs, Saraeh Sharpes line, said line so run to be so loeatea@ that the boundary cut off “est o* said line shall contain Thirty Acres and in which 30 acres shall be included the dwelling house and outbuildings. The said deed to be executed and de- livered as soon as said land can. be surveyed and the correct boundary line run and established. 7 Soenbanten of said Thirty acres shall remain in the de-~ fendant, except such part thereof as plaintiff may desire to break. up for cultiyation and as to this plaintiff shall have possession as soon as crops thereon can he conveniently gathered after naturity, crops for 1913 being reserved to defendant. Plaintiff is to pay defendant one- third of all crops made on said Thirty acres from and after January 1st, : pay 1914, for and during the term of her natural life, and is to the costs e ° of this action as taxod by the Clerk of this court: It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that defendant execute and deliver to plaintiff a food and suffs cient deed, with usual covenants of seizen and warranty, conveying to plaintiff he complaint to be sem, % located and bounded according to the above agreenent of the parties, Fer Serving in said deed one third of all crops grown thereon from and after January 1st, 1914, for and during the natural life of the defendant. It 4p further adjudged that plaintiff pay the costs of My action to be taxed by the clerk of this courte 3 B. FP. Long, Jude Presiding. * long, Attorneys for plaintiff. North Carolina, Iredell Count¥. Harold ‘oods, ) ) rs ) ) Postal Telerraph Company. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and beins heard before His Honor B. F. Long, Judge and a Jury, on the issues submitted to the jury, and the jury finding the issues as follows; First: Did the defendant negligently fail to deliver the telesram as alleged in the Company? Answer: Yes, Second: “ould plaintiff have attended the funeral of his nother, had the telesran been ielivered in a reasonable tine? Answer: Yes. ny e WW < Third: Notwithstanding the nerlirence of the defendant 20N +h ’ 4 - . could the plainti*f by the exercise of ordinary diligence have attended his mother's funeral? answer: Yes. Yourth: Did the plaintiff compromise and settle his cause of action against the Yestern Union Telegraph Company, as alleged in the ah Answer? Answer: Yos, as embodied in the written papér - writing marked Exhibit "A", P a” . Fh ifth: What dumage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant? Answer: Wone." ¢ a {it is therefore, upon notion of E. Te Cansler and LeGe Caldwell, counsel for the defendant considered and adjudged by the Court + % cost in its behalf expended and eo hence without day B. FP. long, Judge Presiding. Yorth Carolina.) In the Superior Court, Iredell Countye ) liay Term, 1913, J, Le Sherrill, Assignee, ) ) -VS= ‘ ) IUDGHMENT, Eugene Gambert. en * {his cause coming on to be heard, at this term of the Court before His Honor Be #. Long, Judge, upon the verified Complaint, no answer being filed; and it appearing to the Court that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three Hundred Sixty Two and 40 /'100 Dollars, ‘and it further appearing to the Court that to ‘seoure the same the defendant executed a mortgage upon ‘the property deseribed in the Complaint, and it further appearing that said debt was not paid at maturity, and the plainti*f Sherrill instituted Claim and Dlivery proceedings for the possession of his property, and it further appearing that the defendant, in order’ to obtain possession of the property described in the Complaint executed a replevy Bond with C. %. Brown and WwW. EB Wilson, as sureties, on the 3rd day of October, 1912, And it appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and the defendant through their respective attorneys on May Sra, 1913, entered into an agreenent wherein it was agreed that if said debt was not paid, on or before the 19th day of May, 1913, that said debt and every part thereof, should be, and hecome a lien upon the property set forth in the Complaint, and that the plaintiff? should have possession of the said property for the sale thereof and the satisfaction of his said debt, So far as said property would go, and it appearing to the Court that no part of said debt has been paid: it is therefore, considered and Si sBdee by the Court, that the plaintist recover of the defendant the sum of Three Hundred Sixty Two ana 40/100 dollars, with cost fron the first day 6f thir term, and thé cost of the action. It ia further considered and adjudged by the-Conrt Shet... the pla‘ntiff recover of the defendant the possession of the property de- Seribed in the Complaint, and that he expose the sane to public sale to Kr bidder for cash, in accordance with the terma of the nortrage ‘It 48 further adjudged that the plaintitf have Judamont et the sureties of said replesy bond for the sun of Three Hundred y Two and 40/100 dollars, upon the failure of the defendant to de-— liver & to the plaintiff the phen erbraced in said mOTtRABS cnt oat North Carolina,) Superior Court, ’ ) Iredell County. ) ” May Term, 1913, Re Be Adams, - vs~ Geo, Gibson and MW. Ne Gibson, and Jas. 4. Hartness, Ce Se Co carnishee, * This cause ve on to be heard at this Term of the Court before His Honor B. F. Long “Judge and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted as follows, to-wit: First: Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiff. and if how moh? Pp ’ Answer: 7174.48 Second: Has the summons and warrant of Attachnent in this case beam duly served on the de*endants? answer: Yes. Third: “hat sum if any, has the vuretaben Jas. 4. lartness, Clem | of the Suvertor Court In his hands belonging to the defendants, or either of them? Answer: 9339.42 It is therefore considered and adjudeed that the plain- tit recover of the defendant George Gibsor ana Me Ne. Fibson the sum of — one hundred ané@ seventy four and 48/100 dollars, torether with his costs — of action, except the witness fres of pleineise eer It is further considered and ad judred that the plaintiff recover of Jas. 4A. liartness Cleric of the Superior Court, garnishee, the sun of Three Iundred and Thirty Nine and 42/100 dollars to be discharged _ upon the payment of the sum of One Hundred and Seventy Four and 46/100 cone and plaintiffs costs of action one plaintiff's witnesses fees, and ‘thie Judgment is hereby declared a lien on said fund in the hands of said Jas, A. Hartness, C. S.C B. FP. Long, Judge Presiding. Horth Carolina, ! Superior Court, ) Iredell County.) May Term, 1913, 2. Je Conger, ' a. PiNaAL JUDGNENT, Re ~ Galliher et Bie X Tis cause coming on to be heard at this tem of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor B. ¥. Lone, Jnudre Presiding, ana it appearing that Je &. Boyd, Commissioner appointed by the Court to sell the lands described in the complaint in thie action, ont the 24th day of Mareh, 1915, offered said land for sale at public auction to the highest bidder, at the Court House door in Statesville, NN. C. ,when and Where H. J. Murdock became the last and Hirhest bidder a at the sum of three hundred ($300.00) dollars cash, and né advance bids having been filed, and i4 appearing to the court that said price is fair and reasonable: It i8 therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the said sale be and it is hereby in all respects confirmed, and the Said J. u. Boyd, Commissioner aforesaid, upon payment of the purchase money is ‘authorised and ai rected to mak e, execute and deliver deed to the purchaser in fee sinple for the lands aforesaid. It is further con- sidered and adjudred that the purehase rnoney be applied to the judgment and cost in this action, and that any surplus remaining be “paid over to the defendanta, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. yo State of North Carolina, ) Superior Court, Iredell County, Re A, Elan, -VB~ “ lucy E. Willson, : ae: Appearing to the | Court that the matters in controversy have a settiea: It 1s therefore, by consent, ordered = adjudged by the Court that tne Plaintiff recover of the defendants, J. 3. Wilson and tuey B. 9412807 the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this B. ¥. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, ‘ Iredell County. ) May Term, 1915. A. D. Matlock, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Cotton Manufacturers’ Saloa Company, Bankrupt. ~va- JUDOMENT. Virginia Garolina and Southern Railway Company and Statesville Knitting Company. This cause coming on to be heard at the May Tern, 1913, of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, Be Fe Long, Judge Presidine, and it appearing to the Court *hat this controversy has beon settled; : it 18 therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the Virginia Carolina and Southern Ratlway Company . the cum of one hundred and twenty five and no/100 dollara ($126.00) end that the costs of this action be paid by the Stateaville Knitting Companys Be. P. Long, Judge Préniding. Yorth Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, ) Iredell County.) Liny Term, 1913, In the matter .of the will of) De, Re We MALLe JUDGMENRP . This cause coming on to be heard the q PPifiogte:: of tho Supreme Sourt of North Carolina: It is therefore considered and ad judred that judpment be and is hereby entered in agcordance wht; the paid certifioate, and P et ' aia that the ‘adgnent heretofore be ana tho gare 40 hereby aortfirned. Be FP. Lone, Judpe Prepid Yorth Carolina, } In the Superior Court, ) Iredell County: ) 6, G Tharpe, SJUDQMEN® 4 ) us | ) Virginia Spann and Richard Spann. This cause coning on to be heard before Hia Honor B. F. Long, Judge, at thio term,. when Counsel for the defendant in open Court moved thy Sourt to be allowed to wi thdraw the appeal in said oause: It 18 therefore, ordered that said appeal be and the same 19 hereby withdrawn, and judgment be rendered for the anownt set forth in the transoript of the Justice of the Ponce, and the defendant Virginia Spann be relieved from said Judenent upon the paynent of the amount agreed upon by Counpel for plaintiff amd defendant and the cost of the aétion to he taxed by the Clerk of the Court, B. FP. Long, Judge Presiding. Yorth Carolina, ) In the Superior Court. : ) Iredell County, ) hiay Tern, 1913, ‘ R. Be Joyner, ) ae JUDGUENT. City of Statooville.s ) gt This oause coming on to be heard upon the certificate of the Supreme Court of North Carolina; it in therefore constdored and nd judged that. judgment be‘aid the sane 1s hereby entered in accordance with the gaia certificate end that the judprtent be and the same is hereby cénfirred. : Be PF. Long, Judge Presiding. en ta ste “name” Uorth Carolina, ) In the Superior Court, ; ither ) | nm P 1 VSe Iredell Vounty. ) May Term, 1915, 4 ] arsen Upen the rendering ef the verdict the plaintiff meves te setaaside the verdict en the greund 4.1 it was centrary te the greater wétght ef evidence. Ida J. Christy netien denied. Plaintiff excepts and meves alse fer a new trial fer errers ef ) i. JUDGMENT. Ceurt te be set eut in assignments ef errer and statement ef the case en appeal o Preston ee) eases te the Supreme Ceurt. Metioned denied. Plaintiff excepts, Judgment. Exceptien This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before : Appeal. Netice ef appeal waived in epen “eurt. Appeal bend fixed at fifty ¢ Nig Honor B. F. Long, Judge Presiding, and the Jury, and the Jury having Dellars and adjudged sufficient. Upen agreement ef ceunsel the appellant is_ answered all the issues subnitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and ef allewed sixty days frem the 29th day ef May 1913 in which to serve statement ef arainst the defendant: case en appeal and the appellant and the appellee is allewed sixty days It 1s there*ore ordered and adjudged by the Court thet tp thereafter in which te accept er serve ceunter-case. ponds of matrimony heretofore existing between the nlainti?? and dofendant ~ be and the sane are hereby absolutely and totally dissolved and the plaintiff, Thig Henerable Ceurt takes an adjeurnment sine die. Ida J. Christy, be and she is }creby released from the bonds of matrimony ‘with / ‘ said defendant, Preston Christy, and that she be eranted a divorce absolute « from said bonds of natrimony. Judge Presiding. It is further ordered and decreed by the Court that the plaintiff, Ida J. Uhristy shall have the absolute control and austody of all the children born to their said marriage, Be Fe. Lone, JInige Presiding. North Carolina, ) The Superior Court. ) Iredell County, ) Hay Term, 19135. Ke Us. Steele, JUDGHER Li. ) ) -vs-~ ) ) Ldgar tiarlick.) This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor Be Pe ee etree rrr Cer cr emer Wt eee re ae Judge, and a jury, and the jury having danewered the iesues snbritted to thea by consent of'all parties and their attorneys, as set out in the Minutes of this court: It 1s therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintif£ 0s, “teele recover of the defendant Udgar Warlick the sum of $80,0¢ Bight olds | ith interest on the sane from May the 19th, 1913, and the cost of this. *° be taxed by the Clork. intially ttt It is ‘considered and ad judred that this jud Case Traction Engine, and one saw mill conplete, mortgage drawn, ¢ Who 18 hereby ‘appointed Sommiasioner for pe shed toy: ae at ne auction after ao carclin®, oe Commas July Term 1913. 9A6. . Be it remembered that at a Superior Court began and held in and for the sunty of Iredell on the 5th Monday before the lst Monday in September the same ging the esth day of July 1913, when and where His Honor B, F. Long was present and egiding and Hon. w. C. Hammer, Solicitor, was present and prosecuting for the ate, the following proceedings were had, to-wit: J, M. Deaton, High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the snes of the following good and lawful men to serve as jurors Porathe Teee to-wit: , G, Plyler, T, J. Murdock, B. C. Howard, R. C. Bell, J. S. Cashion, J. Wade Sherrill, _ I, Nixon, J. T. Nicholson, 5. F. Renegar, J, A. Gatton, L. L. Baraard, Alley Renegar, _M, Grider, ¥. R, Overcash, J. ?. Cavin, “. R. Holler, H. F, Jordon, R. D. Williams, coffey, 5. R. Jurney, J. S. Marlin, C. H. Harris, I. 5. Ostwalt, T. J. Reddick, Grater, G. M. West, T. J. Hoke, A. F. Tucker, ¥. T. Laws, S. B, Miller, Weber, ye H. Sloan, oe ite Stroud and W. L. Gaither, The following good and lawful men were drawn’'as Grand Jurors for the term o,wit: 5, B. Miller, J. 5. Marlin, L. L. Barnard, T. J. Hoke, S. R. Jurney, T. H. Sloan, . C. Bell, N. G. Crater, J. T. Nicholson, J, Wade Sherrill, S, F, Renegar, C. H. Harris, . F, Tucker, J, T. Reddick, J. A. Stroud, T. J. Murdock, J. A. Gatvon and G. T. Webber. S, B. Miller was sworn as foreman of the grand jury. J. ©. Thompson was sworn asp officer to the grand jury. 'W. H, Coffey was excused until Wedriesday of this week on account of sickness n his family. W. R. Overcash was excused for the term. The following good and lawful men werekaraamxas Petit Jurors for the first eek of this term to-wit: W. G. Plyler, B. C. Howard, L. CG. Campbell, J. S. Cashion, . 1, Nixon, J. F. Cavin, M. R. Holler, R. D. Williams, H. F. Jordon, I. S- Ostwalt, é i, West, W. T, Laws, W. L. Gaither 0. 5 tate v8, rank Lane, Retailing. Capias and continued. . & Retailing. Capias and continued. Mo. 10 State vs. v6. a Sallie Patterson. Retailing. i Turner Forciable Trespass. N. P. By motion of solicitor State's witnesses Junius ° not allowed to have any pay. vs. fo, 3 & 4 Consolidted. Sallie Patterson. Retailing. etate vs. Rbin Pearce C. C- W. and Cruelty to animals. Plea not guilty. The following jury; w. G. Plyler, B. C. Howard, L. C. Campbell, T. I. Nixon, J. F. Cavin, Mw. R. Hollar, W. M. Jordon, R. D. Williams, I. S* Ostwalt, G. M. West, vs. : . L. Gaither being sworn and empanelled for their John Drum. Retailing. W. T. Laws and W. L. G g p werdict sag they find the defendant not guilty on both charges. vs. Harvey Benfield. vs. LeRoy Bryant. Cc. Ge WT Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of &15 and the cost of this action. vs. Harvey Benfield. Threaten to kill, v8, Dick Summers. Retailing. Plea guilty. E. S. Morrison State's witness called and failed to answer. It is ordered by the Court that he pay a on fine of $20. Henry Thomas. Rude conduct at church, Caplas and continued. No, 65 State V8, vs. Carl VanPekt. Gambling. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that the Al, Patterson. Capias and continued, ‘Tea Ss rdriiny defendants pay a fine of $10 each and each pay one-third of the cost Sect Rawr of this case, No. 31 State vs. No, g Swaim Williamss. Retailing. Capias and continued. eo Be State , i va, No, 35 Mo State a " "alters, Retailing. Continued for the State, vs, False Pretense. Continued, Capias for P, B.C. Deaton as to B. C. Deston, P. B. Deabon, . ‘ee svete a a, Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that he be ° 3 mm lLare ¢ Jim Baker ae confined in the common jail of Iredell County for the term of two c. S. Holland. Affray. Plea not guilty. The following jury: W. M, Jordon, &, p, (2.) years and is assigned to the County Commissioners to be worked Estes, 2 F. Coodin, J. W. Sprinkle, John P. Howard, A. F. Cook, on the public roads of Iredell County during the term of his impris- J. W. Vickery,W. G. Plyler, B. C. Howard, L. 0. Campbell, J. S, onment. Cashion, T. I. Nixon being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find both defendants guilty. It is ordered by the Court 0, 77 tate v8. A. True bill was returned in the following cases: larence Knox. L. & RR. Plea guiity. Judgment having been pronounced in No Ros TL State vs. Isidore Allison Ca Geit 66 judgment in this case is suspended upon good behavior. No. 72 State vs. Isidore Allison, Buck Brown, Hub McLelland, Lee Eccles, Ernest Weaver, Gambling. 0, 24 No. 56 State vs. Tom Allison,Fuller Codwell and Henry Smith. Gambling. State No. 66 State vs. Clarence Knox, i ee se v8, 78 State vs. Clarence Knox, Li eo RG herrill Templeton. L. & R. Plea guilty. Prayer for judgment. Prayer 70 State Isidore Allison, A; Wy Dy We continued upon the payment of the cost of this action, 73 State vs. John Sowers. Resisting Officer, Defendant recoginized in the sum of $25 for his appearance at the 57 State Carl Williams . hig he Be next term of this Court. 76 State . Wayne Allen. die lee ee 16 his Honorable Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 A. M. Tuesday July 29, 1913. vs. Affray. Plea not guilty. The following jury: ¥. M. Jordon,E. D. Bet . fi, z. bose Fate Bowles R. F. Goodin, J. W. Sprinkle, John Howard, A, F. Cook, W. L. Gaither, Judge Presiding. Foy Stout J. W. Vickery, W. T. Laws, G. M. West, I. S. Ostwalt and R. D. Williams Glenn Stout being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the defendants June Stout not guilty. ves Gambling. Plea guilty as to Tom Allison, Capias as to codwell | Tom aitison and Smith. It is ordered by the Court that Tom Allison pay a fine Fuller Codwell of $25 and cost, Henry Smith TUESDAY JULY29, 1913. This Honorable Court m vs. J. A. Davidson. No. 41 State vs. Jennie Pearson. No, 42 State VS. Cuther Harpe. No. 43 State v8. Morris Kerley. No,44 State V8. B, P. Young. No. 45 State vs. C. C. Parks. No. 46 State vs. Parks Williams, No, 47 State vs. Everett Corriher No, 48 State ve. Earlie Moose. To appear and show good behavior. To appear and show good behavior. apoear and shew good behavior. appear and show good behavior, appear and show good behavior, appear and show good behavior, To appear and show good behavior, . To appear and show good behavior, Retailing. Called anf ailed, eets according to adjournment at 9:30 Con(t under former order, Continued under former order, Con't under former order. Con't under former order, Con't under former order. Con't under former order. Con't under former order. Con't under former orders Judgment ni soi fa and oa] Mayne Alleli lL. & Rs patterson Sci fa $50. Judgment absolute according to the sci fa. H, Houston. ag , 9, 50 tate VSe nerrill Templeton Sci fa $100. Sci fa dismissed, _ A. Templeton. o. 76 tate vs. Pilea. guilty. lo. BL state VS. ag Albea, A. ¥. D. W. Continued for the defendant on account of his sickness. io, 70 and 71 consolidated. tate vs, sidore Allison. GC. C. W. and A. WD. W. Plea not guilty. The following jury; W. G. Plyler, B. C. Howard, L. 0. Campbell, J. S. Cashion, T. I. Nixon, J. F, Cavin, M. R, Hollar, W. M. Jordon, R. D. Williams, 7 S. Os vEeERe G. M. West and W. T. Laws béing sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they ?ind the defendant not guilty of C. C. W, but find him guilty ae A. W. D. W ..~»=6It 18 ordered and adjudged by the court that the defenauint be éearined to the eéumiiin jail of Iredell County for the term of 12 months and is assigned to work on the public roads of ee" hy Jr posh Iredell County during the term of his imrpisonment. a cha Sifalsity woevtta tr ki raggdd ti pum Lpowe pth he las p the, barre Hf 10022 Aded he Ort ha hall be Gambling. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that Buck Brow : term of 4 1 be confined to the common Jail of Iredell County for the Hub MoLelland for the term of 3 months; Lee Bocles aad vn ate of months and Ernest Allison for the term ef 3 months oe eae he assigned to work on the public roade of Iredell County term of h ... t having besn pronounced on = teldore Alligon in no 70 in this case is suspended as Ww “upon his being of good beiavior. vs. Jas M. Wooten. No, 60 State vs. Willie “mith. No. 78 State ™ vs. Jack Potts Bélin Young. Simple assault., Motion to quash the yo, 62 state Plea not guilty. . me — bill of indictment upon its gverett Sherrill face. Motion denied. Exception. The following jury: 9 T. 5. pysard. ". L. Gaither, W. M. Jordon, E, LD. Estes, R. F. Goodin, J, W, Sprinkle, J. P. Howard, A. F. Cook, J. W. Vickery, Barron Smith, W. C, Patterson, J. F. Raymer and B. C, Howard Being sworn and ef- panelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty, ‘tt No. 57 ‘g ordered and adjudged by the Court that he pay a fine of $10 and state the cost of this action. VB. Carl Williams. ¥. De Wi Plea not guilty. The following jury: W. G. Plyler. vs. B. C. Howard, L. 0. Campbell, J. S. Chasion, T. I. Nixon, J. F, Cavin, John Long. M. R. Hollar, W. M. Jordon, R. D. Williams, I. S. Ostwalt, 6G. M. West and W. T. Laws being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty. It is ordered by the Court that tt defendant be confined to the common jail of Iredell County for the term of 30 days and is assigned to work on the public roads of said county during the term of his imprisonment. L. & R. Jack Potts waives bill and pleads guilty to forciable trespass which plea is accepted by the Skaks Solicitor. Bolin John Sowers, Young pleads not guilty. The following jury; W. L. Gaither, W. M. Jordon, E, D, Estes, R. F, Goodin, J. W. Sprinkle, John Homr™ A. F. Cook, J. W. Vickery, W. C. Papberson, Barron Smith; J. Fe Raya and Wade Lippard being sworn and empanelled for their verdict #47 they find the defendant Bolin Young Guilty. It is ordered by Court that theyx defendants be confined in the common jail of County auxtmg for a term of 8 months each and are assigned on the public raods of Iredell County during the term of thet imprisonment. May of te PG : State va, wy A We Da We R. H. Turner and KS. Herman State's witnesses called and failed to answer. Judgment nici sci fa entered against them in the sum of $20 each. Continued by consent. Ke Wa Oe Me Plea not guilty. The following jury; ¥. L Gaither, wv, M. Jordon, E. D estes, R. F. Goodin, J. W. Sprinkle, J. P. Howard, A. F. Cook, J. W. Goodnight, J. F. Raymer, Barron Smith, ', CG. Patterson and Wade Lippard being sworn and emapnelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty. It is ordered by the fourt that the defendant be ccnfined to the commmn jail of Iredlll County for the term of 2 months and is assigned to work on the public roads of Iredell County during the term of his imprisonment, Resisting officer. Plea not guilty. The following jury; W. G. Plyler, B. C. Howard, L. C. Campbell, J. S. Cashion, T. I. Nixon,J. F. Cravin, » Me Re Hollar, W. M. Jordon, R. D. Williams, I. S- Ostwalt, G. M. West and W. T. Laws being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they fin d the defendant guilty. It is ordered vy the Court that the defendant pay a fine of $10 and the cost of this action. The cost to include the jail fees. Dick Sum oe Retailing. Nol Pros, No. 20 and 21 Consolidated State V8. Cute Holmes. vs. W. Williams Mize Williams. No. £5 State vs. Maurice Jurney,. No. 27 State V8. Maurice Jurney No, 28 State vs. Maurice Jurney. No. 29 State vs. Maurice Jurney. No. 36 State vs, Maurice Jurney Fr wei Ww. and A. ¥. D. W. Plea not guilty . The following jury; L. Gaither, W. M. Jordon, E. dD. Estes, Re F, Goodin, J. 7 ‘ J. P. Howard, A. F. Cook, J. W. Vickery, J, F. Raymer, ¥W. C, Patterns Barron Smith and Wade Lippard being sworn and empanelied for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty in both cases, It is ordered by the Court that he pay a fine of $25 and cost in Mf 21 and in No 20 motion for judgment. Motion continued upon good ater and the payment of the cost of the action. Larceny. Robt Trent State's witness called and failed to answer. Judgment nici sci fa in sum of $40 entened against hin. It is ordered that the defendants give bond in the sum of $50 each for thilh appearance at the next term of this Court, Retailing. Plea guilty. Retailing. Plea gilty. Retailing. Plea guilty. Retailing. Plea guilty, Retailing. Plea guilty. Beck Woods, ' >, 37 ate V8s burice Jurney- 0, 38 ate V8. aurice Jurney. 0. 39 ate VS. aurice Jurney. 0, 40 ate vs. laurice Jurney. 0, 26 tate vs, saac Rash, Manufacturing Liquor. Retailing. Plea guilty. Plea guilty. Retailing. Retailing. Plea guilty. Retailing. Plea guilty. Plea guilty. lo, 32 and 33 consolidated, tate V8. Oley Hamlet ill Fox uther Jefferson. 0, 34 tate v8, C C. W. A. W. D. W. and Gambling. Hamlet Called and failed. Judgment nici sci fa and capias. Plea not guilty as to Fox and Jefferson. The Following jury: W. G. Plyler, B. C. Howard, L. C. Campbell, J. S. Cashion, T. I. Nixon, J. F. Cavin, M. R. Hollar, W. M. Jordon, R. D. Williams, I. S, Ostwalt, G. M. West and W. T. Laws being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the defendants both guilty of A. W. D. W and not guilty of gambling. ; ‘aither, W. M. Plea not guilty. The following jury; ¥. L. Ga ’ Jordon, E. D. Estes, R. F. Goodin, J. W. Sprinkle, fone Bowens o Cook, J. W. Vickery, W. C. Patterson, Barron Smith, - : ameer 9 Wade Lippard being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say find the defendant not guilty. Bs moarable Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 A. M. Wednesday July 30, 1915. Judge Presiding. WEDNESDAY JULY 30, 1915. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:50 A. M, No. 32 State Vs. Coley Hamlet. vs. Ernest Sherrill. VS. Mason Fleming Joe Little vs. John Gardner W. A, Matheson. No. 62 State Vs. Ben Little. No. 55 State vs. B. C. Campbell A. W. D. W. Plea guilty. Plea guilty. Motion for judgment. Motion continued upon the payment of the cost of this action and defendant required to give bond in the sum of $100 for his appearance at October Term 1915 of Iredell Superior Court and show that he has been of good behavior and especially show total abstinence. A. W. D. W. Defendants called and failed to answer. Judgment nie! sci fa and capaias. ond fixed at $100 each. Affray. Defendants called and failed to answer. Judgment nici sci fa and capias. Bond fixed at $100 eabh. Nol Pros. A. W. D. W. Plea not guilt y. The following jury, ¥ %& - = ere L. 0. Campbell, J. S. Ceshinn Me 7 Nixon J + R. Hollar, W., M. Jordon, R. D. Williams, I. s, ostwalt and Ww. T. Laws being sworn and t find the defecdegt not gui ee pag, ¥ Brown, Cruelty to animals. Defendant called and failed to answer. Judgment nici sci fa and capiss. Bond in the sum of $100 required. . 55 ate VS. a Norris. Forgery. Defendant called and failed, Judgment nici sci fa and capias. o, 67 ate VB. Plea not guilty. ana Fletcher. Larcng. The following jury; ¥. L. Gaither, W. M. Jordon, E. D. Estes, R. F. Goodin, J. W. Sprinkle, John Howard, A. F. Cook, J. W. Vickery, Barron Smith, ¥%. C. Patterson, J. F. Raymer, and Wade Lippard being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say. Trail continued over until tomorrow. he Grand Jury appeared in open Court and submitted their report and were discharged. t is ordered by the Court that their report be recorded on the minutes of Court and hat a copy be filed with the Board of County Commissioners. tate V8. . ently Beam, Destroying growing crop. By agreement of the Solicitor and attorney for the defendant this case is continued. Bond in the sum of $50 was by the defendant for his appearance at the next term of this Court, % 15 on the Civil Docket 8. R, L. Bame A vs, Continued by consent. Continued by consent. : Express Company, Continued by consent. 1 ete Court takes an adjournment until 9:50 A. M. ®HURSDAY JULY 31 ; 1913. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:30 A. M, ae fo, 30 a No. 74 ot “a State pick Summers. Retailing. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay 4 fine v8. of $50 and the cost of this action. Isidore Allison. Keeping gambling house. Plea guilty. Motion for judgment. Motion continued upon good behavior. . No, 84 No. 75 State State VSe vs Lindsay Barker Ada Money F. & A. Continued for the defendants. C. D. Newport. Embezzelment. Capias. ° mee No, 85 _— State tia VB. pant Cheeny Coduatiams COptets Ira Norris. Forgery. Called and failed. Judgment ni ci sci fa and capias. No. 84 Wo. 86 _—— ; State ‘ vs. a Lindsay Barker Ournay Seton | eo alate Continued for the defendants. Bond in the suNTH 4 poiton, «896 aA, W. =D. W. «Plea not guilty. The following jury; W. G. Plyler, $100 required. B. C. Howard, L. 0. Campbell, J. 5S. Cashion, T. I. Nixon, J. F. Cavin, M. R. Hollar, W. M. Jordon, R. D. Williams, I. S. Ostwalt and W. T. ee , Laws being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the Stabe defendants not guilty. VS. Cane Fletcher. Larcency. Trial continued over from yesterday. The Jury No, 26 heretofore sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find th State defendant guilty, It is ordered by the Court that the defendant ” vB, confined in the common jail of Iredell County for the term > ° — eeac ash, Mfg. Liquor, It is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay @ fine months and is assigned to work on the public roads of tredel} , of $100 and the cost. County @uring the term of his imprisonment. No. 68 State Retailing. It is ordered by the Court that the defendat pay & fine ‘ V8. A of $200 and the cost of this action, Jack Morgan. Retailing. Nol Pros With Leave, ‘ = ‘ No. 83 State sas Rude conduct at church, Continued for the defendat. : -. Fred Claywell No. 27 State vs. re Murice eine. Retailing. Motion for judgment. Motion continued ‘wporm-tne~pagnen oP~tirecoet—of—tnts— action Retailing. Motion for judgment. Motion continued upon the payment of the cost of this action, No. 28 a O- State State v8. ‘ Murice Jurney. Retailing. Motion for judgment. Motion continuea upon the paynent a : t me coley Hamley of the cost. Bill Fox Luther Jefferson. A W. De W. It is ordered by the Court that the defendants be u . oo confined to the common jail of Iredell County for the term of 4 months each and are assigned to work on the public roads of Iredell County vs. during the term of their imprisonment. Murice Jurnery. Retailing. Motion for judgment. Motion continued upon the payment of the cost of this action. orves, Dee: No, 2 Statesville Lumber Company. vs. VS. nent J, A, Rankin. Continued, Murice Jurney. Retailing. Motion for judgment. Motion contineed upon the pa of the cost of this action. No, 10 Hattie Smith VB. Bass Smith, Continued. VS. t Murice Jurney. Retailing. Motion for judgment: Motion continued upon the payne? to. ib of the cost of this action. rs, R, L. Bame vs, No. 38 ) Jas. ¥, Brown, Continued, allowed time to answer. State Aas vs. ? Murice Jurney. Retailing. 4 Motion for judgment. Motion continued upon the P? ~ of the cost of this action, 3 Continued, x \ ape Retailing. Motion for judgment. Motion continued upon of the cost of this action, No. 33 James Munday VB. James Church. Continued. No. 35 P. S. Torrence vs. R. H, Ramsey. Contunued. No, 37 #. E. Stewart, et al VS. Ernest Stewart, et al. Continued. No. 42 Maggie Lawrence VS. William Lawrence. Continued, No. 52 C. M. Summers vs. G. W. Simpson. Continued Jim Stevenson No. 53 V8. Jane Sowers. Continued. mo. & 5S C. M. Summers vs. W. D. Murphy ' Continued, No. l Wesley Redman vs. Thos Dacons. Continued, vs. Luck Construction Company. Continued no. 4 in & Holland V8e . * Hollar. Continued No, 5 cotton Manufacturing Sales Co VB. Johnson & Walker. Continued. Ho, 6 rR, 4, Gaither V8. Geo, M, Carson. Continued No, .7 Harold Woods V8. Postal Telegraph Company Off under former judgment. No. 8 E. L, Gadthers. «1 VB. Amos Turner, et al. Continued Ko, 9 ¥. C, Johnson V8. Ragle Clothing Manufacturing Co. Continued. State and Lizzie McCulloaj vs, less Weaver, Continued. Yo, 19 International Waste Co ‘afield Manufacturing Company No. 14 Cc. 8S. Holland v8. W. H. Clinard. Continued. No. 16 Statesville Plaster and Cement Co VS. J. Le Russell. Continued under former order. iT ay Be OS VS. Mooresville Furniture Company. Continued under former order. No. 19 W. T. Nixon VS. Ba. By. CO. Off under former judgment. No. 20 Will Simonton Vs. Delia Simonton. Continued Bo. 22 Le T. Stimson vs. R. A. Gaither Continued. No. 25 S. J. Holland vs. No. 27 aan Wineeoff, Amrd of G. M. Winecoff vs. T. H. Winecoff, et al, Continued, we ree Kinoad Furneiture Company Ko, 30 uP 30 S. caldwell VBe ger Bros. Continued. jo, SL nie clark V8. . Clark Continued. 0, 34 , Pp, Morton 8 _ H, Moore, et al. Continued. 0. 36 he R. M. Sutton Co. V8. , P, and L, L. Alexander. Continued 0, 39 | 1, K. Morrison Produce and Provision Co V8. Bcott-Sparger Co. Continued No, 40 parah M, Foster vs, penith Vernier, et al. Time allowed to amend pleadings. : 10, 41 ointy Board of “ducation V8. ity of Statesville Continued. 0, 43 "arold Alexander,by his next friend Neil P, Alexander vs, ity of Statesville. Continued. No, 46 AC. Rumple v8, C hablie Westmoreland, et al. Continued. lo, 47 | No, 48 Pp. P. Dulin v8. Diamond Furniture Company. Continued No. 49 Barger Bros. vs. Samoset Lumber Company. Open for judgment. No. 51 Spedwell Merchants Corporation v8. Morrison Produce and Provision Company. Continued. No. 54 A. C. Sharpe Vs. Go Be Holland. Continued, Wyson Miles Co vs. Jas. W. Brown. Continued, No. 5o Lazenby Montgomery Hadw Co vs. Statesville Gas Company and Quaker City Construction Company. The following jury; W. C. Patterson, J. P. Howard, S. D. Dingler, J. F. Cavin, R. F. West, ¥ D. Lip . R. Robinson, G. M. West, B. P. Smith, P. i oui J. F, Raymer and J, ¥. Vickery being sworn and empanelldd for their verdict say they find the issu let. submitted to them as follows: Are the defendants indebted to the plaintiffs, and if so, in what amount? answer: Yes $233.06 with interest from June 24, 1912. 2nd, Was said indebtedness for material furnished said defendants in the erection of * building on the lost described in the complaint ? ae Answer: Yes. Did the plaintiffs file a lien on said —_— nt? Answer: Yes. . ses as alleged in the complai State VB. Wayne Allen. It is ordered by the Court that he be nis e matory 9 term to begin September 1, 1913, Coane te o Petes tad This Honorable Court takes an adjournment until 10 A. M. Friday A * de 1913. ¥ AL Judge Presiding. spay AvguST 1, 1915, 2 ‘gonorable Court meets according to adjournment at 10 A. M. 10, 56 state v8. Gambling. The defendant through his attorney, W. D. Turner, waives his presence and pleads guilty. It is ordered by the Court that he pay a fine of $25.00 an. the cost of this case. No, 30 State VS. Dick Summers. Retailing. The fine of $50 heretofore imposed in this case is reduced to $25 and the defendant required to give bond in the sum of #100 for his appearance at the next term of this court and show that he has been of good behavior. iN 0. 67 State vs, ana Fletcher. Larceny. Verdict of guilty heretofore rendered. The defendant voluntarily having paid into Court $100 and $60. 76 cost in the case, and his counsel in consideration thereof asking that judgment be suspended and the State not objecting thereto, the Court suspends the judgment upon his good behavior; and as the $100 is not a fine but a contribution made by the defendant for clemency, it is ordered that the said $100. be applied by the County Commissioners to such public use as in their discretion they may deem best. No. 32 State ve, Coley Hamlet Bill Fox, luther Jefferson, Two of the defendants, Bill Fox and Luther Jefferson, having paid into court $66.66 ea bh and the cost of this action the judgment heretofore rendered against them in this case is hereby stricken out as to them. eae Upon the call of the Summons Docket, it is ordered that the plaintiffs have is in which to file complaints, and the defendants have thirty days in which io tine « demur, or file petition for removal, except in such cases where judgment by default are rendered and in such cases wherein some special ordere may be otherwise made, In case of Andy Glenn vs. Southern Railway Company it is agreed he tien that the amount to be demanded in the complaint shall not exceed the jurisdicitiona amount of $3000.00 but is to stay below that amount. JL A hog joie Povcdlee 2 a - ; thirty day, | % ‘ oy a pn carolina In the Superior Court. rt ’ dell County July Term 1915. a0e ° } and order removing H. C. Dockery as Commissioner and appointing the 1 em Sheriff of Richmond County Commissioner. v8. D, Maness This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, and it being brought to the tention of the Court by Z. V. Long and H. P. Grier attorneys for the plaintiffs, that 5, C, Dockery, Jr. heretofore appointed commissioner to sell certain property directed to » gold under the judgment entered in this action at the November Term 1911 has failed » sell said property or to report his action, if any, in the premises to the Court or » the attorneys for the plaintiff: It is, terefore, ordered and decreed that H. C. Dockery Jr., he and he is preby removed as commissioner in this action and the sheriff of Richmond County is hereby BD pointed commissioner with full power and authority to advertise and sell all the property pntioned and directed to be sold under the former judgment of this court entered at yenber Term 1911 in the above entitled action. The said commissioner will advertise said sale as directed in the former bigment and report his proceedings to the October Term 1913 of this Court. This use is retained for further orders. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. Q, Steele vs, ear Warlick, It is ordered that the Clerk retax the costs, as he may find the facts to be. August 7, 1913. .B. F. Long, Judge. | i : z* i Barger Bros. vs. Samoset Lumber Company. JUDGMENT. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and it appearing to th Court that the defendant has satisfied plaintiffs demands: and adjudgec by the Court that the action be dismissed upon the defendants paying the costs. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. Jany Term 1915. John . M. Sharpe and T. L.° Tomlin vs. Ww. A. Summers. JUDGMENT. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Superior Court of Ired 111 County before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding, and the plaintiff having withdrawn their motion for voluntary non-suit; it is therefore considered and sj that the said cause be and the same is hereby continued. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell Couty. July Term 19135. T. D. Miller and A, P. Barron VB. W. A. Summers. IU DHM EAT. This cause coming on to be heard and bing heard at this term of the of Iredell County before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding, and it appearing that motion for non-suit made by plaintiéfs It ip in the cause has been withdrawn: ? wo considered and adjudged by the Corut that the cause be and the same is hereby withdre and the case is continued. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. It is, therefore, considera court | In the Superior Court th carolin@» tredell County: July Term 1915. Lazenby Wontgomery Harwware Company V5. statesville Gas Company, JUDGMENT. wuaker city Construction Company and others. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor » Be Fe Long, Judge Presiding and a jury and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as set out in the record; it is therefore considered and ad judged that the plai tiff recover of the pkx defendat Statesville Gas Company and the quaker City Construction Company the sum of Two Hundred Dodlars and thiry three ana and 06/100 ($233.06) Dollars with interest from June 24, 1912 until paid and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. It is further considered and adjudged that this judgment is a specific lien on the lot of land in the city of Statesville and the buildings thereon situated on the rast Side of South Center Street. adjoining Lee Martin's and others containing three fourths of an acre more or less, known as the Gas Company Lot described in the complaint in this action, and that said judgment is a specifif lien on said land and buildings from the llth dag of September 1912. B. F. Long, Judge Presicing. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County July Term 1913. J. A. Davidson and J. 0. Gaither, Assigness of the Commercial National Bank vs, %, A. Summers. JI uDGMENT. i. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding actd e July Term 1913 of Iredelll Superior Court, and it appearing to the Court that this mare is based on a promisory note under seal given to the defnedna ot the rye _ National Bank and assigned by it to the plaintiffs; and it appearing and the ourt that the plaintiffs have fited a verified complaint in this action that a tthe defendant has filed no answer; and it appearing to the Court futher by the farrant of attachment was issued in this action which warrant was duly executed » a8 ee of Iredelll County by levying upon the real estate of the defendat of the rer the return on said warrant said reurn a copied in th e Onn e Court of Iredell County in Judgment bocke page eeeenrint futher to the Court that the the sheriff Iredell Countpy virture of said rtesemak sare upon certain personal property of the defendant as will appear by levy upon . the inventory filed by him in this action, and it appearing that the ray gon the real etate was made on the 6th day sf February 1913 and that the levy fia the personal property on the 6th day of February 1913; recover of Goererore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs from the Sra defendants the sum of $391.59 together with the interest on the same ‘his action: day of February 1913 until paid and in addition thereto the costs of SClared "a it is further considered and adjudged by the Court that this judgment is February ai @ lien upon the real estate of the defendant from the 6th day of ‘his cause i and a lien upon the peronal property set out in the inventory filed in futher that the “ne bay of February 1915 and it is considered ane ad judged levied upon the sheriff Ts hereby or.ered to advertise and sell the said property and apply the proceeds of the same to the satisfaction of this judgent. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. Court. North Carolina, In the Superior Iredell County. July Term 1915. vs. Wayne Alten. JUDGMENT. This cause comirg on to be heard before His Honor B. F. Long, Judge Presiding, and having been heard, and the Court having mad an investigation of the facts in connection with said case, and it appearing to the Court, and the Court having found the following facts: First: That the said Wayne Allen has plead guilty of the charge of Larcency and Receving. Second: That the said Wayne Allen is under sixteen years of age. Third: That the parants of the said Wayne Alen are unable to properly care for and control him by reason of th fact that the father is away from home and unable to give the proper amount of attention to the training of his boy. Fourth: That it is best for the said Wayne Allen and this community that te he should be sentenccd to the Stonewall Jackson Training School. WHEREFORE it is ordered and adjuged by the Court that the gaia Wayne Allen be committed to the Stonewall Jackson Training &« Industrial School to the end that the trustees or other governoring agents thereof may kee, restrain and control him during his minority or until such time as they shall deem proper for has discrarge, under such proper and humane rules and regulations as may be adopted by the gaid trustees in accordiance with the rovisions of Chapter 509 and 955 of the public Laws of North Carolina of the year 1907; that this entence shall go into affect on thr first day of September 1913, and that the sheriff of Iredelll County shall have the power under and by reason of this judgment to take and arrest the said Wayne Allen on ssid! date, and to deliver hi m to the authorities of the said institation. This the 31th day of July 1913. B. F, Long, Judge Presiding. ) tredell on the sonoBeR TEAM LOLS Be it remembered that at a superior Court began and held in and for the County 6th Monday after the lst Monday in September, the same being the 13th ¢ october 1913, when and where His Honor B. F. Long, was present and presiding and ay 0 Solicitor, was present and prosecuting for the State the following eS ¢, Hammer, ocodeedings were nad, to-wit: High Sheriff of Iredell County returned into open Court the names irst week of the of the following good and lawful men to serve 48 jurors for thea&term to wit J. M. Deaton, J. ¥% McLean, 0. P. Harrison, J. ©. Murdock, Jr., J. L. Wilcox, ?. 4. Chester, ¢. P» Brown, Milton Cheshire, D. P. Sartin, N. J. Gaither, E. L. Swann, ". H. Newton, 5 7, Cornelius, T, &. Ervin, Jas. W. Reavis, J. M. Cavin, ¥%. ¥. Williamson, ‘*. Bost, J, ¥ Johnson, + c.Williams, C. M. Creedmore, F. F. Shaver, M. B. Williams, A. H. A. Troutman, Hoit M. Morrison, R. F. Dagenhardt, J. 4. Cascagon , J. aA. Knox, tilson, P. ", ¥, Frazier, ¥. E, Bowles, J. M. Fry, and A. A. Miller. i. ¥. Lentz reported dead, L. W. brown and M. I. Cates not found. N. J. Gaither and T, W, Frazier were excused for the term. The following were drawn as grand jurors for this term, to-wit:- W. i. Bowles, 7 ?, A. Troutman, J. C. Williams, W. H. Newton, C. M. Creedmore, D..P. Sartin, Gc. F. Brown, ¥. A. Bost, P. ae Chester, J. A. Cascadon, J. Me Fry, O. P. Harrison, Milton cheshire, T. E, Swann, W. T. Cormelius, R. Ff, Dazenhardt, A. A. Miller and J. . Johnson. %, H. Newton wes sworn as foreman of the grand jury. J, ¢. Thompson was sworn as officer to the grand jury. It is ordered by the Court that Reuben Cowles be allowed fifty cents from the County treasurery for drawing the grand jury. The follosing good and lawful men were drawn as petiti jurors for the baRm first week of the term, to-wit: - J. A, Knox, Jas. We Reavis, J. C. Murdock, Jr. Ne Williamson, J. ¥. McLean, 8. & Wiliams, E. L Swann, 0. H. Wilson, Hoit M. Morrison, J. L. Wilcox, J. M., Cavin, "i. Lippard, fo, 1, State vs, Frank Lane, Retailing. ho, 2 State Vs, frank Lane, Retaiy ing. No, 4 State vs, ‘emty Tho ras, Rude conduct at church, Capias and continued. vs. Al Patterson. vs. Swain Williams. tetailing. VS. Dick Money. Embezzelment. ll Ira Norris. Forgery. vs. Mason Fleming Joe Little. Vs. C. D. Newport. Embezzelment. vs. Ira Norris . forgery. vs. Fuller Caldwell, Gambling.» Capias and continued. Capias and continued. Capias and continued and continued, Capias and continued. ~ Capias and continued. Capias and continued, Capias and continued, No, 24 state VS. ceasar YOUNG. Yo. 20 state VSe seasar YOUNG- No, 26 Frank Alvare. vs, Ne cen Little. u “ No. .00 State vs, David Bennet. a Ws No, 31 State vs, Retailing. Capias and continued. False Pretense. upias and continued. continued. T, 8 MeCoy, Capias and continued. No, 32 State vs 1. Re McCoy, Retailing. No. 33 State vs, ‘+ R. eCoy, Retailing. Contiuned Continued yo. 27 spate vs. John Holland. A. ' ", Peea guilty. Judgment suspended upon the payment of ty is ordered by the Court that Dan Hedrick and T. F, Lambert State's witnesses be not aklowed to prove as witnesses in this cage, they having been called anf ailed to answer. Bio, 18 state VS. ppad Claywell. vailing. Plea not guilty. The following jury; J. A. Knox, Jas, i, J. c. Murdock, Jr., VY. ¥%. Williamson, J. W. McLean, R. B, L. Swann, ©.qH. Wilson, Hoit M. Morrison, J. L. Wilcox J. M. Cavin and T.a#. Lippard being swornaand empanelied for their verdict say they find the defendant not guilty. fio. 58 State vs. apt Steele, alias Robert Holmes. Seduction. Called and failed to answer. Judgt, nici sci fa and capias. Instanter sci fa ordered issued. Case continued. Defendant required togive bond in the sum of $300. Rude conduct at church, Plea not guilty. The follwoing jury; J. A. Knox, Jas. W. Reavis, J. ©. Murdock, Jr., "', W, Williamson, J. % McLean, R. B. Williams, E. L. Swann, 0. H. Wilson, Hoit M. orrison Jc Lo. Wileox, J. &. Gavin and T. H. Lippard being sworn and empanelléd for their verdict say they find the defendant not guilty. Jim Yock. “imple assault. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant Gaston Albea. A. W. De. W. Defendant Called anf failed. Judgment nici sci fa pay a fine of }. and the cost of this action. and capias. DRAKARKRERRAR EA RARRAB Renae xX No, 56 State vs, Carl Williams. Larceny. Defendant called anf failed. Judgment nici sci fa ané Johnson Davis, capias. John G. Turner, Cruelty to animals. A. C. McHargue, State's witnesses called and failed to answer, Judgment nici in the sum of Fifty Dollars entered against him, and it is ordered that he be not allowed to prove attendance in thls case, Case continued for the state on account of the absence of the State's witnesssz ve. Affray. John Gardner, through his counsel, Mr. Zeb. V- Turlingt™ John Garaner =8% Pleads guilty. It is ordered by ‘the Court that he pay a sim AOF , : ae ects Matheson”. w°9 and the cost of this action. Nol Pros as to W. A- Matheson Larceny. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for the term of 6 months and is assigned to work on the public roads of said county during the term 6f his imprisonment. Injury to crop. The defendant, through his counsel, comes into open. court, and not admitting his guilt, but protesting his innocence, says that he is unable to contend futher with the State, and therefore, with the consent of the Solicitor, and the leave of the Court enters t a plea of nolo contendre. ae MenGhagnent Sorts RSurt is suspended upoh the payment of the cost of this action and upon the defendant being of good behavior. : ~ ti ce Rn — Si eR AER ss aS! ae Oe vs. Fenry Caldwell Assault. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the court that he pay & fing of 520 and the cost of this action, and give bond in the sum of $f for his appearance at the next term of this Court and show good behavior. VS. John Byers. Larceny. Not a VS. ‘alter Christie. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that he pay a fine of and the cost of this action. VS. Zollie Sherrill. Retailing. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Geurt that the defendant pay a fine of $50 and the cost of this action. No. 62 State vs. John Hnery Allison. Retailing. Deft. Pleads guilty. Jim King Campbell State's witness called and failed t answer. Instanter capias ordere and it is ordedred by the Court that he be not allowed to prove attendance in this case. Nos. 63 and 64. Consolidated, State vs. Jim Sherrill Bub Lackey. As. Wi Da We Ve Plea not guilty. The following jury; J. A. Knéi Jas, W, Reavis, J. C. Murdock, Jr., W. ¥. Williamson, W. McLean, R. B. Williams, E. L. Swann, 0. H. Wilson, Hoit M. Morrisons J. L. Wilcox, J. M. Cavin and T. H. Lipard being sworn and Om, elled for theri verdict say t Trial continued over until Lonorrer This Honorable Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 A. M. Tuesday Oct 14; 1915. i. P. dongs ee Judge Presiding. TUESDAY OCTOBER 14, 1913. Honorable court meets according to adjournment at 9:50 A. M. ono this yo, 63 and 64 state vs. Jim Sherrill a e, D. We Trial continued over from yesterday. pud Lackey- The jury heretofore gworn and empanelled for their verdict say that. they find the defendant Bud Lackey not guilty. the foréeiture against Jim King Campbell in case of State vs. John Henry Allison is ordered stricken out. No, 85 State V8. | Drunk at church. Plea guilty. Hershel Rash. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay a fine of »15 and the cost of this action. le. 41g State vs. J, A. Davidson, To appear and show good behavior. Continued under former order. No, 35 ‘tate vs. Karley Noose. To appear and show good behavior. Continued under former order. No. 36 State Vs, Jennie Pearso: , To show good behavior. Continued under former order. No, 37 State V8. Cuthy er larpe. To show good behavior. Continued under former order. ho, 38 To show good behavior. Continued under former order. | To show good behavior, © me V8. C.-C; Parks. vs. Parks Wiliams. No. 43 State VSe Ernest Sherrill. Mike Yilliams Walter Williams. VS. B. C. Deaton P. B. Deaton. Bub Lackey. vs. Ada Voney Lindsay Baker, To show good behavior. Continued under former order, show good behavior, Continued under former order, To show good behavior. Continued under former order. Larceny. Plea not guilty. The following jury; . Be Vilson, M. D. Tilley, Tom Lippard, T. ¢. Smith, J. H. West, J. Le Reed, J. F. Walter, W. C. Patterson, Jake Lippard, Frank Craven, E. A. Morrison and L. F. Scott being sworn and emapnellet for their verdict say they find the defendants not guilty. False Pretense. Nol Pros, Called and failed, Judgment nici Ada Money called and failed. Judgment nici soi f . } and capias, Case contiued on account of the absence of ada Hor No, 18 state v8. ed Claywe™l Rude conduct at church. Lefendant called and failed. Judgment ’r : nici sci fa and capias.. Case continued and defendant required to give bond in the sum of }200. Db; 4, rerfelkean Plea not guilty. The following jury; ii, Wilson, M. D. Tilley, Tom Lippard, T. J. Smith, J. i West, J. le Reed, J. F. Kalters, ‘%. C. Patterson, Jake Lippard, F. M. craven, E. A. Morrison and L. F. Scott being sworn and emapnelle d for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty. Judgment suspended upon his being of good behavior towards his wife id all other persons. Recoginized in the sum of ‘50 for his appearance at October Term 1914 and show that he has been of good behavior. No, 64 State V8. bud Lackey, The forfeiture heretofore entered in this case is ordered stricken out, and the instanter sci fa dismissed. No, 34 “tate vs, "ress Gibbs. Rape. Plea not guilty. The following jury; A. H. Wilson, a 3D: Tilley, Tom Li ypard, Tas Smith, de te West, J. Le Reed, J. F. Walters, ¥. C. Patterson, Jake Lippard, Frank Craven, BE. A. Morrison and L. F. Scott being sworn and emapnelled for heir verdict say they find the defendant not guilty . J.B, Moore, State's witness in case of State vs. Bb. ©. Campbell called and failed to answer, Judgment nici sci fa in the sum of $50 entered against him. No, 68 State Va, p Tsang Harris, Larc eny. Nol Pros. TOBER 15, 1915- qgpwesDaY 0° norable court meets according to adjournment at 9:50 A. M. this Ho Beula Phifer. Larceny of growing crop. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the sourt that she be confine d in the common jail of Iredell Cou: My for the term of 45 days with leave to the county commissioners 3 . Judgment absolute. Execution to issue. to hire her out during the term of her imprisonment, parlie Moose. Sci fa & E ssue No. 45 No. 60 State State vs. V8. Ira Norris mM. Ryre vonneon Retailing. Plea guiliy. . Hal Gill, State's witness }. 5, Norris called and failed to answer. Judgment nici sci fa in the surof J. A. Davidson. Defendants allowed 30 days to answer. 520 entere.. against hin. State v8. John G, Turner. Sci fa. Open to be heard at trial of No. 13 No. 47 Turner Vain. Retailing. Plea not guilty. The following jury; A. H, Wilson, State . D. Tilley, Tom Lippard, T. J. Smith, J. W. West, J. L. Reed, vs. J. F. Walters, W. H. Sherrill, Jake Lippard, Frank Craven, & 4 vason Fleming Morrison and L. F. Scott being sworn and emapnelled for their Joe Little. Judgment absolute. verdict say they find the defendant guilty in both cases. ho, 48 m State ) Ho sy } “ ° his Honorable Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 . M. Wednesday Oct 15, 1915. 0 vs. Jb K- Z he John Gardner crea dD Th R y 1 Judge Presiding. hos F, Walis, Judgment absolute to be discharged upon the payment of the case of State vs. John Gardner ana the cost of sci fa. No, 53 State vs, Lester Flow "lL Y mee Plea ,uilty. It is ordered by the Court that they pay “a fine of $5 each and each pay one-half chs abet 08 RSE ONT The judgment of 6 months on the roads heretofore made in this case is hereby changed to a fine of $50 and the cost of this case. 136 No. 66 State vs. Henry Caldwell. The fine of y<O heretofore imposed is ordered changed to $1¢, No. 50 State places, Gan. Retailing. A verdict of guilty having heretofore been rendered in thi case it is ordered by the court that the defendant be confined to the comron jail of Iredell County for the term of 7 months and is assigng to work on the public roads of Iredell County during the term of his imprisonment. No, . 54 State vs. Turner Cain. Retailing. Judgment suspended. Retailing. Judgmentsuspended, Bigamy. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for the term of 2 years and is assigned to work on the public roads of Iredell County durin; he term of his imrpisonment. No. O State Vs. Harrison Bradshaw, Larceny. Plea not guilty. The following jury; ¥. ¥. Williamson, J Cavin, Hoit M. Morrison, J. W. Reavis, M. D. Tilley, F. F. Swann, J. C. Murdoca, Jr. J. ¥. McLean, L. F, Scott, West and J. F, Walters being sworn and emapnelled for their verdict say XxHEX¥x Trail continued over until tomorrow. J. Ma Shaver, oe Je Me This Honorable Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 A. M. Thursday Oct 16, 1915. hii ie Judge Presiding. quRSDAY OCTOBER 16, 1915. able court meets according to adjournment at 9:50 A. M. this Honor Yo. 52 state vs. i pradshaw Larcency. frail continued over from yesterday. The jury heretofore Harrison . sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they findthe defendant not guilty. No. 54 State v8. jarvey Lee Houston. Incest. BRS Re. G Estelle Houston, State's witness is < iered stricken from pay roll and not allowed to prove attendance. fd Davis. a Pe Plea not guilty. The following jury; J. A. Knox, Jas. W. Reavis, Murdock, Jr. ¥. %. Williamson, J. W. McLean, & B. Williamson, Zz. L. Swant, Wilson, Hoit M. Morrison, J. Le Wilcox, J. M. Cavin anda T. H. Lippard being sworn and emapnelled for their verdict say they find the defendant guilty It is ordered by the Court that he pay a fine of 515 and the cost of this action. fo. 73 State vs. Settle Revels, Keeping disorderly house. Defendant Called and failed to answer. Judgmnent nici sci fa and capias. Clarence King, Larceny. Knox, Plea not guilty. The following jury; Ja Ae Reavis, J. C. Murdock, Jr, W. W. Williamson, J. #, McLean, B. B. Williamson, E. L. Swann, A. H. Wilson, Hoit M. Morrison, J. L. Wilcox, J. M. Cavin and T, H. Lippard being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the defendant not guilty. Gest e Plea not guilty. The following Jury; W. ¥. Williamson, 7 Retailing. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the Court that the Cavin, Hoit ¥. Morrison, J. W. Reavis, M. D. Tilley, f. F. Shaver, g 1 defendant be confined in the common jail of Iredell County for the Swann, J. C. Murdock, J. ¥. McLean, L. F. Scett, J. H. West and Jd, term of 10 months and is assigned to work on the \public roads of said Valters being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the county during the term of his imprisonment. defendant guilty. [t is ordered by the Court that the defendant pay a fin of “20 and the cost of this action. VS. Thos Brown Retailing. Plea guilty. Having been sent to the roa ds in Thos D . ; , : ; ; iudgme n this case is suspended upon good behavior. fetaliling. lea not guilty. The following jury; J. 4. Knox, Jas, We Rea judgment 1 k g D. Re Howard, ¥% &. Sherrill, P. A. Shinn, M. D. Tilley, F. F. Shaver, £1 Swann, J. C. Murdock, J. W- McLean, L. F. Scott and J. Il, West being swom No, 99 and empanelled for their verdict say they find the defendant not guilty, State V8. Thos Brown, Retailing. Flea uilty. Having been sent to the roads judgment tn this case is suspended upon good behavior. V8. Henry Caldwell. Defendant recoginixed in the sum of ‘(50 for his appearanc e at October Term 1914 and show that he has been of good behavior. vs, Jim Sherrill. Ww. De. W The defendant having heretofore plead guilty, it is ordered by the court that he pay a fine of ‘20 and the cost of this case Retailing. Plea guilty. It is ordered by the court that the defendant be confined in the comron jail of Iredell Vounty for the term of 10 months and is assigned to work on the public roads of said John | , rindi ty nt i in this case county during the term of his imprisonment. lenry Allison. Retailing. A plea of guilty having been en ered i heretofore, it is ordered by the ~ourt that the defendant pay 4 fine of $15 and the cost of this case and that he give bond in the sum of $50 for his appearance at October Term 1914 of this Court ” 00 and show his good behavior, and that he has not used or disposed of Dump Ewell. Retailing. Plea guilty. Judgment having been prononced in No } ; any spiritous liquors. Judgment is suspended in this case upon good behavior. No. 102 tet State State vs. va, Dump Ewell, Ret , > yo 100 etailing. Plea guilty. Judgment having been pronounced # 4 ‘tn Shereiy3. C. Cc, 4%, Judgment haviag been pronounced in no. 65 judgment in this Judgment in this case is suspended upon good behavior. case is suspened upon good behaviot. 440 Upon the coming in of the report of the Grand Jury, it is ordered that the same be Spreai upon the minutes of the court, and that a copy thereof be furnished the Board of County Commissioners, to the end that they may see the recommendations of the Grand Jury ang the a cony thereof also be furnished to Dr. Arch Campbell, County Physician, to the end thy he may examine the persons reported to be insane in the jail and at the County Home, an ; . vd. ¥. Plea guilty. Upon motion of the Solicitor, possible have them placed in the Insane Asylum. judgment is suspended upon payment of the cost of this case. 1, 61 tate vs. Jonn Grose A. W. De We Plea gui.ty. It is ordered by the Court that Barnett ute Holmes 1 a: Continued. pay 3/4 of the cost of this case and Kelly pay 1/4 of the cost of this ‘obie Holmes. case And XSMakX ENONXRENAX WOME XLNXKMAXSMMXGLXKLOAXBARAXLARXLROLRAARRCAME re dé t d. xkxmexkxkermxarx teisxcaurkxandxshenxxaadxhekaxiar, and defendants are & ios 69 and 70 consolidate recoginized in the sum of }100 each for their appearance at October temperate > +4 ; ' VS. 1914 of this court and show good behavior, and also to show to the (out os pe Bell called and failed. Judgment nici sci fa and ‘ —— i oa : jae. '. Jefferson that they have learned to read and write, anda have been friendly to ei capias unless bond is give in 30 days. Case continued. ‘innie Jefferson other. as uince Bell fo, 95 V8. tate vampbell, Larceny. Continued. Defendant required to give bond in the sum of vs. ‘200. J. F. Moore State's witness required to give pond in the su come Patterson of 5200 for his appearance to-morrow before the Court. linor Belt. Affray. Continued.as to Belt. Plea huilty as to Patterson. No. 74 Judgment suspended upon payment of the cost. State ve VS. ae | vs, A. W. Blackwelder, Earl Martin. W. D i Oy Morrison D. Defendants called and failed. Judgment nich 8¢ ravford Reece, and capias. Case continued. Rude conduet at church. Roy Merri:on by his attorney 1 O. CaLeneet Pleads guilty. Motion for judgment continued upon the payment of the No. 91 cost, Capias for Crawford Reece. State vs. hig Honorable Court takes an adjourment until 9:30. M. Friday October 17, 1915. Columbus Mills. Larcency. The following jury; J. A. Knox, Jas. ¥. Reavis, J B A i J. & f ‘i mfp M. Morrison, M. D. Tilley, F. F. Shaver, 5. be gwann, ‘ te a ( Murdock, J. W. Cavin, Hoit McLean, L. F. Scott and J. H. West being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say. Trial continued over until Judge Presiding. tomorrow, PRIDAY OCTOBER 17, 19156 This Honorable Court meets according to adjournemtn at 9:50. A. M. No. 9 State and Lizzie McCullough vs. Less Weaver-- Continued, 2X hO. 04 state and Ada Money vs. Lindsey ! Continued. Ada Money required to give o bond in the sum of 50. Redman vs. Thos Dacons. Continued. - + ‘tutesville Lumber Co., vs. J. A. Rankin. Continued for the plaintiff. Smith vs. Boss Smith. Continued for the plaintiff. No. 10 International Waste Co., vs. Bloomfitld Manufacturing Co., Continued by the Court. Holland vs. W. H. Clinard. Continued. Bame vs. Jas. W. Brown. Continued by consent on account of sickness of brown. No. 15 H. Burke vs. W. P. McLain. Plaintiff submits to a voluntary non-sutt. Judgment accordingly for costs. No. 16 Will Simonton vs. Delia Simonton. sickness. No. 18 L. T. Stimpson vs. R. A. Gaither. Case is continued for the defendant to it 3 pleadings. | Defendant is allowed is allowed 30 days to answer and plaintiffs vis allowed 50 days thereafter to reply. Continued for the plaintiff on account of i No. 19 Southern Railway Company. Judgment of non-suit. ~ n B Honeyoutt — No, 50 y. Sutton Co. VS- J. P. and L. L. Alexander. Open for judgment. The 2. No, 30 nu, Poster vs. Senith Verner, et Continued for the defendant. Sarah fie r ; No, 34 " an sounty Board of Education vs. City of Statesville. Order for reference. No. 41 ?, P, Dulin et al. VS. Diamond Furniture Co., et al. Continued. No. 45 A. C.: Sharpe vs. C. S. Holland Open for judgment. No. 48 Yrs, Julia ¥, Cowles vs. Providence Life Assuarance Co. Continued. Time to answer, Plaintiff is allowed time to file reply. No, 49 J, H, Cloaninger vs. Jas. “* Brown. Open for judgment. Xo, 50 Peter Holland vs. S. A. Foster. Continued for pleadings. No. 51 andy Glenn vg, Southern Railway Company. to answer, Continued. Defendant allowed 50 aays time Yo, 52 ‘TS, Fannie Redman vs, R, 7 R. 7. Redman. Open for judgment. No, 54 A, P, Sherrill vs, yg. L, Sheereit. time allowed to file pleadings. Continued. State : "8. Columbus Mills. The jury heretofore sworn and emapnelled for their verdict say they f tnd the defendant guilty. It is ordered by the court that he be confined in the “onmen jay °f Iredell county for the term of seven months and is assigned to work 0 bl ig oe of said county during the term of his imprisonment. Russell vs. Luck Construction Company. S, Holland vs. L. T. Hollar? No. 9 Sotton Nfg. Sales Co. vs. Johnson and Walker. Gaither vs. Amos Turner, et al. >. Johnson vs. Clothing M&g. Co. 1 Statesville Plaster and Cement Co. vs. J. Sharpe vs. Kincaid Furniture Company. ~ » Caldwell vs. Mooresville Furniture Company. caldwell vs. Barger Bros. oc Ne. 25 Annie Clark vs. Frank Clark. Continued, No. 3l W. E, Stewart vs. Ernest Stewart et al. Continued, K. Morrison Produce and Provision Co. vs. Scott No.37 T. D. Miller apd A. P Barron vs. W. aA. Summers, No. 38 John ¥. Sharpe and T. L. Tomlin vs. W. A. Summers L. Russell. Sparger Co. Continued under former Continued under former order, Sontinued under former order, Open for oraer. Open for order. Open for judgment. Open for report of referee. Open for report of referee. Continued. Open for judgment. Open for judgment. Continued under former order. io. 42 i Vv ( rison Produce and Provision Co. Continued. ant sorporation s. Mor 1 verch 8 gpedwel io. 43 W. Simpson. Put on Tuesday's Calendar. pA, Simms vs. G. No. 47 Open for order, qysong Miles CO. VS- Jas. ©. Brown. Yo, 56 vary L. Brown vs. Charlie Miller. Open for judgment. Mrs. Mi he No, 58 y, q, and Grier Hunter vs. The White Co. Open for order. No. 61 J. A. Chandler vs. Union Grocery co. Open for order. The cases on the printed calendar, nos. 39-40-14-46 are subject to call on Tuesday following #36 on Tuesday's Calendar. The cases set for trial on Thursday's Calendar, towit- 49-53-55-57-59 and 60 are ' j subject to call for trial on Wednesday's docket, provided, however, that in all divorce cases are subject to be called for trial at any time when the plaintiff may be ready. ; ; wed plaintiff to file In all cases on the summons docket at this term, thirty days allowed { tf ; : answer or dermur complaint as of this term, and defendant is allowed thirty days to file . : i me as of this term, except @n those cases wherein judgment by default is taken, or 80 order otherwise is made. iant The judgment of the Court is that a penalty of 50.00 be entered against the defendan al * , Moore, to be applied to the cost of the case, to indemnify the County in #71 “tate va, B.C, Campbell- up to and including the present term of Court and also to indemnify the County for the beard and lodging of the said B. C. Campbell for guch Wal stn sae tne been detained in jail er shall be detained in jail fap hae a count ef his inability to give bond. ‘he judgment, The Clerk is directed to tax this cost and docket Cora Booe vs. D. U- Campbell Continued. Perjury. The defendant, through his counsel, cones State vs. Press Gibbs. into open Court, and not admitting his guilty, but protesting his innocence, sayg thy he is unable to contend futher with the Court, and therefore, with the congent of the Tt is ordered by the Court that he pay a fine of $25 and the cost of this case. AAA a fe (hk Of Whe — fone ct a“ foes D1° LAL LY ns (he ~ Solicitor and the leave of the Court enters a plea of nolo contendre., D4 hi Cae This } C : 1ig Honorable Court takes an adjourn’ent until Monday Morning October 20th at 10 o'clock A. At ae / GA‘ Judge Presiding. nis Hono Hobbs, Ros mleads guilty to three several sale. 1915. rable court meets according to adjournment at 20 2 ee y, Deaton, High Sheriff of Iredell County, returns in.o open Court the names of the good and lawful men to serve as jurors for the second week of this term, to-wit; ollowing ~ teckey, Bs Norris, L.L. Troutman, R. G. Foard, J. %. Shell, A. S. McKay, J. M. Ve ‘ g Caldwell, J. M. Kellar, J. F, Forcum, W. C. Perry, W. F. Marlow, J. % Shaver 4, Bowles, C- Be Miller, E. F. Stewart, H. W. Miller, J. L. Austin, H. C. Gaither, a Cook, Will P. Bos’ and W. C. Hayes. C. Gaither were excuesed for the term. ;, Hobbs, J. A. Bowles and H. tate VS» The defendaht having heretofore been sentenced to 10 months unp Ewell. Retailing. ruptured and physicially unable to work, yn the roads, his counsel suggests that he is his suggestion is refered to the County Commissioners and the County Physician to the na that they may examine into the facts and determine if the defendant is unable to work bn the roads, and if they decide that he is unable to work on the roads or do any work e shall remain in jail. Attention is also called ee the fact that after he was bound to ourt he made a sale tm of liquor to one Shoemaker. Ko, 115 tate VS. Rimaxguikky The defendant being represented by counsel fattis Brown. Retailing. One pint to Grady Shoemaker, one pint to uke Baxter, and again one pint to Duke Baxter. It is ordered by the Court that he be chines «int ene common jail of Iredell County for the term of 10 months and is assigned ee the public roads of Irddell County during the term of his imprisonment. tate vs, ntenced in No li5 Malti s Brown. The defendant having been sé Retailing. Plea guilty. judgment in this case is suspended upon good behavior. 0, 117 State vs. Rattis B — The defendant having been sentenced in No 115 Retailing. Plea guilty. judgment in this case is sus ended upon good behavior. Continued for deposition. 147 + 149 State VSe BO. 22. “oe D ; religous hi le i OE H. C. Reece. Disturbing religous worship. Plea guilty. Motion for judgment Ss Motion continued until next term of Court upon the paymen vie payment of the cos ess company The following jury; R. C. Lackey, H. Norris, L. L. Troutman, Defendant required to give bond in the sum of $100 for his appea so, BXPF Pearance poard, 3 w. Shell, A. S, McKay, Ross Caldwell, J. M. Kellar, J. F. Forcum, W. C. at the next term of this Court. n, G. Feenns y ¥. F Marlow and J. W. Shaver being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say perry): "4°?" they find the issues submitted to them 4s follows: No, c7 nbroversy die by reason of the negligence of the Southern Express Co \--Did the pig in co J. A. Munday or its employees? VS oO Answer. No. James Church. The following jury; ". C. Lackey, H. Norris, L. L. Troutman, R, G, >. What damage, if any, have plaintiffs sustained? Foard, J. “+ Shell, A. S. McKay, Ross Galdwell, J. M. Kellar, J. F. Forcum, W, C, Perry, Answer: ¥. i, Marlow and J. ¥. Shaver being sowrn and emapnelled for their verdict say they fin the issues submitted to them as follows: l-- Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? In the Superior Court North Carolina, Answer: Fifty Dollars and interest. b 19 October Term 1913. f se ae Iredell County. Q-- Is the plaintiff indebted to defendant in his counter claim, and if so, in what anou Answer: Twenty five doblars damage. The County Board of Education of & y Iredell County. NOe ol vs. Order of Reference. G. M. Winecoff, Admr City of Statesville This cause coming on to be heard at the October Tern, 1913, of the Superior Vs. T. H. Winecoff, et al. The following jury; Cc. B. Miller, E. F. Stweart, J.L. Austin, court of Iredell County, before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding, and it appearing R. B. Cook, Will P. Bost, ¥. C. Hayes, J. L. Waugh, H. G. Sut (0 the Court that the parties to this action have agreed that the same shall be refered; C, A. Westmoreland, ¥. C. Wooten, J. F. Raymer and J. ¥. Shaver It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that the above entitled action be and being sworn and emaanelled for their verdict say they find the fe same is hereby refered to J. B. Armfield, Esq, who shall report his findings of fact issues submitted to them as follows: and conclusions of law to the next term of the Superior court of Iredell County. l-- Did G. M. Win : ‘ Did G. V. Winecoff, for a valuable consideration agree with T. H. winecoff to 2nd . B. F,. Long. extend the tirefor the payment of the note declared on? | Answer: No. . i lca “y Consent. =~ If such extension was given by the payee of the note did R. C. Johnson agree tall VcLaugh “aughlin and Turner for the plfs. ha - . 4 or have notice of it or subsequently ratify it? Dornan 7 Dor “ompson, Atty for the defendan* Answer: Yes, S-- If such extension was made by the payee of the note, did W. F. Smith, agree = or have notice of it, or subsequently ratify it? Answer: Yes. In the Superior Court. North Carolina, Iredell County. D. B. Honeycutt, Plaintiff vs. JIvupDGw Bits ‘outhern Railway Company. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiy the plaintiff through his counsel takes a non-suit. It is therefore ordered that said case be, and the same is hereby non- suited. Tne Clerk of the Court will tax the cost against the plaintiff and his bondsman, except the cost of th e defendant's witnesses, which counsel have agreed is nt to be taxed against the plaintiff. F. Long, By Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court October Term, 19135. Iredell County. Sutton Company vs. JUDGHE AAs Alexander ] p Ve i * Alexander and L. L. trading and doing business under the firm name and style f Alexander bros. This cause coming on to be heard at the October Term 19135 of Iredell Superior Court, before His Honor, B. F, Long, Judge Presiding, and it appearing to the Court that the parties have settled and compromised the matters in controversy; It is considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of Fifteen and a9/100 Dollars and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. This Honorable Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 A. M. Tuesday October 21, 1915. ft fh Mug a Judge Presiding. sons OCTOBE 151 - 2, 1913. ae rable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:50 A. ™. this Hono yo, 28 7, P, Morten oe whe following jury; R- C. Lackey, H. Norris, L. L. Troutman, R. G. eee, 4, Moore Jj. ¥. Shell, A. S. McKay, Ross Caldwell, J. M. Kellar, J.F. Forcum, W, C. 2, L. Hoore perry, W. F. Marlow and J. ¥. Shaver being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the issues submitted to them as follows: 1. Ig the defendant indebtod to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? ‘160 with interest from March 6, 1911. Answer: r--Ig theplaintiff indebted to the defendant on his counter-claim, as alleged, and if so, in what amount? Answer: 375. 10, 29 P, S, Torrence The following jury; C. B. Miller, E. F. Stewart, H. ¥. Miller, v8. J. Le Austin, R. B. Cook, Will P. Bost, ¥. Hayes, J. L. Waugh, R KH, Ramsey. H. C. Summers, C. A. Westmoreland, ¥. C. Wooten and J. F. Raymer being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the issues submitted to them as follows: ‘ l-- Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, if so, in what amount? Answer: $147.00 2--Ig the plaintiff indebted unto the defendant by counter-claim or payments, if so, in what amount? Answer: 553.00 3-- Is plaintiff's claim barred by the statute of limitations: Answer: No. No, 36 Har old Alexander, by his next friend Keil p, Alexander VS. “ity of Statesville, The following jury; J. F. Raymer, R. C. Lackey, S. 0. Lazenby, Lk & Mein SG Genet, Ce Be Seber, 4. FB. TNPON™ W. FB. Morrow, W. C. Perry, H. Norris, J. “. Shaver and Lewis Anderson being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say. {rial continued Over until tommorrow. en naarmenanret North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. October Term 1915. ¢, VW. Goodman H. i. Fant Vs. Southern Ex ress CO. Judgment. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court by his Honor , Judge B. F. Long, and @ jury, and being heard and the jury having answered the following issues, 45S follows, to-wit: ")--Did the pig in controversy die by reason of the negligence of the Southern Express ., or its employees? Answer: No 2-- What damage, if any, has plaintiffs sustained? Answer: And it futher appearing that 5. M. Goodman had no interest in the matter in controversy and his counsel took a voluntary non-suit, it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the action be dismissed and the cost be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of the Court and the defendant go without day. October 21, 1913. B. F. Leng, Judge Presiding. This Honorable Court takes an adjournment untii 9:50 A. Wednesday Oct. 22; 1913. a “] / / us b J A ats: 4 ee Judge Presiding. carold Alexander, veil Ps Alexander sity of statesville g according to adjournmnt at 9:50 A. M. by his next friend Trial continued over from yesterday. vos Trail continued over until tomorrow. f) 2 Statesville, N. Cc. Oct. 21, 1913. . i Judge of Superior Court, To the yonorable ge 92 Frten, N.C. Dear Sir:- At the October term of Superior Court of Iredell on the first week of said term a a motion was made by L. G. Caldwell, 4 torney for one F, E. Crawley, movigg that he be discharged from the county jail of Iredell, the attorney stating that his information veing that he had previously been in the Insane Asylum at Morganton, and he read to the ‘ourt a certificate of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Rockingham County. At the time, there was no indictment found against F. EK. Crawley on the criminal docket of Iredell, although this was a criminal term of court. There was no oetition presented to the Court for a writ of habeas corpus, to the end that the Court right make inquiry anc inform itself as to whether or not there was any criminal indictment or criminal charge against F. &. Crawley, and no writ of habeas corpus was ever sued out, to the end that the Court might make ingiiry and ascertain the facts as to the detention of this prisoner, if he was illegally detained. The Court stated at the time that if it was desired that the insanity of the orisoner named should be inquired of by the Court, that it would do so, if it was given an opportunity, but said opportunity was never furnished this Court by petition, or wit of habeas corpus, or by a bill of indictment found against this prisoner, orby having th e Court informed of some other court in Iredell County had issued process for him and detained him. So that the Court never did at any time make any order adjudicating F. E. Crawley to be insane. The Court never made and order to release him from prison, be- cause the Court did not have any case to find it, but the Court was informed that a charge tas pending against him in the County of Davidson, and that the sheriff of Davidson tas asking that he be transferred to Davidson for trial. brewilak Whereupon the Court stated to the sheriff of Iredell that unless the matter was ru before it in some legal form, so that the Court could inquire into the sanity arog man Crawley, or unless some charge was preferred, that he could respond to the srocess Of Davidson County and allow him to be transferred to that jurisdiction for trial. over the ta el is informed that the sheriff, after this eccurance in court, turned charged agai Fr. &. Crawley to Deputy Sheriff Caudle of Davidson County, to auswer the ‘IQR Ener him there pending. Since his transfer to Davidson County, the court % Crawl ata bill of indictment was drawn by the Solicitor of this Court against indletment he charging him with defrauding one C. Le Neilson, and also a bill of that the Gra: 6 ia him with defaruding one C. C. Tharpe, and the Court also discovers ‘Continued Jury made the following entries on each of the bills of indictments ndletments or want of witnesses" and that they had not found any bills. So that these naving deen ih docketed on the Judge's Docket after the grand jury was dismissed, ; ound among other presentments papers by the Clerk. May from re Solicitor did not call the Court attention to these bills before he went urt, I suppose because there had been no bills found. At the time of the occurance in Court referred to, when Mr, Caldwell mad ethe some person or friend of lating to his custody or mother of Crawley and the *Wiion for t Paley he release of Crawle, the sheriff stated that , a reieage, ah iy some money in his hands for some purpose re sherite, & & transaction between such person, to-wit, the ‘led the ies Court mide no order ab te that money, because it had no power” It has never » Nor had opportunity to try it er to adjudicate the right of the parties. of last wee tS Court 1 fter the occurance Wee s alse now informed today, four or five days er tnd 4 k, that W. J, Lazenby, Esq., had issued warrants for the arrest of the defendant et had been executed, and that he had been out in jail, but that the ace has never had any preliminary examination. The Court ha The Court had made this statement, to the end that the suage in Lexingte wvch action as me may see >roper, with regard to this prisoner, and that the eg in Iredell nay take such action and make such investiagtion #8 f regard to the detention of this prisoner. North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. October Term 1913. S. M. Goodman Fant Vs. Southern Exoress Co, Judgment. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court by his Honor » Judge Lb, F, Long, and a jury, and being heard and the jury having answered the following issues, as follows, to-wit: "l--Did the pig in controversy die by reason of the negligence >of the Southern Express Co., or its employees? Answer: No 2-- What damage, if any, has plaintiffs sustained? And it futher appearing that S. M. Goodman had no interest in the matter in Controversy and his counsel took a voluntary non-suit, it is, therefore, ordered and @d judged that the action be dismissed and the cost be taxed against the plaintiff by the Clerk of the Court and the defendant §0 without day. October 21, 1913. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. Honorable Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 A, M. Wednesday Oct. 22, 1913. Ld hig Judge Presiding. congas OCTOBER e2, 1913. Honorable Court meets according to adjournmnt at 9:30 A. mM, this Be fo, 36 rarold Alexander, by his next friend der neil P. Alexa Trial continued over from yesterday. ane Trail continued over until tomorrow. city of Statesville Statesville, N. C. Oct. 21, 1913. " ii Judge of Superior Court, to the Honorable & fietettcn’ hE. Dear Sir: - At the October term of Superior Court of Iredell on the first week of said term a motion was made by L. C. Caldwell, Attorney for one F. E, Crawley, moving that he be discharged from the county jail of Iredell, the attorney stating that his information veing that he had previously been in the Insane Asylum at Morganton, and.he read to the court a certificate of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Rockingham County. At the time, there was no indictment found against F. E. Crawley on the criminal docket of Iredell, although this was a criminal term of court. There was no setition presented to Lhe Court for a writ of habeas corpus, to the end that the Court night make inquiry and inform itself as to whether or not there was any criminal indictment or criminal charge against F, EK. Crawley, and no writ of habeas corpus was ever sued out, to the end that the Court might make inquiry and ascertain the facts as to the detention of this prisoner, if he was illegally detained. The Court stated at the time that if it was desired that the insanity of the prisoner named should be inquired of by the Court, that it would do so, if it was given an opportunity, but said opportunity was never furnished this Court by petition, or wit of habeas corpus, or by a bill of indictment found against this prisoner, orby having th e Court informed of some other court in Iredell County had issued process for him and detained him. a So that the Court never did at any time make any order adjudicating F. E. vra¥ley to be insane. The Court never made and order to release him from prison, be- p Cause the Court did not have any case to find it, but the Court was informed that a charge "8 pending against him in the County of Davidson, and that the sheriff of Davidson "as asking that he be transferred to Davidson for trial. bag Whereupon the Court stated to the sheriff of Iredell that unless the matter was a he before it in some legal form, so that the Court could inquire into the sanity need € man Crawley, or unless some charge was preferred, that he could respond to the *"-7888 Of Davidson County and allow him to be transferred to that jurisdiction for trial. over the Bre Court is informed that the sheriff, after this eccurance in court, turned charged against, E. Crawley to Deputy Sheriff Caudle of Davidson County, to answer the dleewvers thee” him there pending. Since his transfer to Davidson County, the Court EGoae at a bill of indictment was drawn by the Solicitor of this Court against indletment, sh Charging him with defrauding one C. L. Neilson, and also a bill of \hat the Gra S him with defaruding one C. C. Tharpe, and the Court also discovers "Continued = Jury made the following entries on each of the bills of indictments Ndletments or want of witnesses" and that they had not found any bills. So that these aaving been si docketed on the Judge's Docket after the grand jury was dismissed, Cund among other presentments papers by the Clerk, Way from a psiter did not call the Court attention to these bills before he went me I suppose because there had been no bills found. *bLon feta ‘ime of the occurance in Court referred to, when Mr. Caldwell mad cthe ‘TaWley hag <a pase of Crawley, the sheriff stated that some person or friend of elease , c Some money in his hands for some purpose relating to his custody or Sherite, 6 &@ transaction between such person, to-wit, the mother of Crawley and the This Cage Court made no order as to that money, because it had no power- It has never - > nor had opportunity to try it or to adjudicate the right of the parties. ie Court is alse now informed today, four or five days after the occurance wnat ¥. J. Lazenb h t of the defe ee z y, Esc., had issued warrants for the arres Of the Toant® had been executed, and that he had been put in jail, but that the ea “ce has never had any preliminary examination. : this statement, to the end that the Jusge in Lexington 43 he may see oreper, with regard to this prisoner, and that th in Iredell may take such action and make such investiagt "sgard to the detentien of this prisoner. ee ‘ 8 d on the records of this court by the ai, It is ordered that these facts be sprea n : y° the and that a copy be sent to His Honor, Thos J. Shaw, at Lexington and a copy be an, w. J. Lazenby, &8q- furnis Ne Ue B. F. Leng, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. October Term 1915. A. G. Brown, and C. H. Brown trading as Brown Bros. VS. Lorene Cotton 3ced Oil Mills, Inc. ¥. Brown. This cause coming on to be heard at this Term of the Court before His Honor, FF. Long, Judge Presiding, and being heard, and it appearing that a verified complaint 1as been filed and that no answer has been filed. It is, therefore, ordered and ad judged that the plaintiffs recover of th defendants the sum of Two Thousand Dollars with interest from Jany 1, 1911 until paid at the rate of six per cent per annum, subject to a credit of $202.20 of date Jan 20, 1915. It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the in this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Bay Bees Bs FF. - Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. October Term 1915. Ww Carpenter and Jas. ¥W I Brown vs. Las. L. Cloaninger. This cause coming on at this term of the Court upon the regular call of the i a e appearance docket, the plaintiffs come into court and coluntarily take 4 non-suit of ™ action. It is, therefore, ordered 6 that the same be, and is hereby non-suited, and ™ Clerk of the court will tax up the cost against the plaintiffs. B. F. Geng; Judge Presiding. the Superior Court orth. carolina , In the Sup iredell County. Oct. Term 19135. P, S, Torrence V8. > 4, Ramsey JUDGMENT. Ne tae ' This cause coming on to be heard at this term by his Honor, Judge b. F. tong, and a jury, and being heard, and the jury having answered the issues as herein Li ) set out, to-wit: - tj.. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff and if so in what Answer. $147,00--2 Is the plaintiff indebted unto the defencant by counter- amount? in what amount? Answer: slain or payments, if so, 453,00--3-- Is plaintiff's claim varred by the statute of limitations? Answer: No:; It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendat the sum of $94,00 with interest at the rate of six ver cent per annum until paid and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. (ct. 22, 1913. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. October Term 1913. i, D. Winecoff, Administrator of (. M. Winecoff, Defendants . aan JUDGMENT ‘. i, Winecoff, R, G. Johnson and . F, Smith, Defendants. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before His Honor + B, Long, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by the ‘ourt, a8 set out in the Record: It is therefore considered by the Court, that the plaintiffs recover of -_ defendants the sum of One Hundred and Fifty Dollars, with interest thereon at six per Cent per annum from February 15th 1912, until paid; for costs of this action to be ti ‘xed by the Clerk of the Court. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. Thig Hono table Court takes an adjournent until 9:30 A. M. Thursday Oct. 25, (hf Judge Presiding. THURSDAY OCTOBER 24, 1915. Mernis Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:30. A. M. No. 36 Harold Alexander, by his next friend Alexander. Neil P. Trial continued over from yesterday. vs. Trial continued over until tommorrow. City of Statesville. North Carolina, In the Sgperior Court Iredell County. Betober Term 19135. J. H. Cloaninger JUO GUE N Ts W. Brown, Turner. This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, Judge Bb, F, Long, at thi term of the court, and it appearing that the complaint in the cause was filed on July &th 1913, during the July Term of Court, and it further appearing that the complaint was duly verified, and the summons in the cause was issued and served on the defendants more than ten days before the day of convening of the July Term of gaid Court, and it futher appearing that no answer has been filed. It is, therefore, upon motion of Geo. A. Morrow, Attorney for the plaintiff, ordered and adjudged, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of One Tnousant Dellars ($1,000.) with interest thereon from Sept 15, 1906 at the rate of six per cent subject to a credit of six hundred and twenty two dollars and seventy six cents (8622.76), which was paid en Feby the 8th 1911. It is further adjudged that the plaintiff recover the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. October Term 1913. Ella Sharpe vs. UDG Bees Roscoe Sherrill. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Judge B. F. Long, and it appearing that the plaintiff comes into open court and submits to # non-suit: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that said action is and the ” is hereby non-suited. Lb. F. Long, Judge Presiding. In the Superior Court October Term 1933. JUDGMENT. Holland This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, Judge 6, S 3. Fe Longs at the Oetober Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and it appearing mio the Ceurt that the defendat appealed said cause from the Justive of the Peace, and it Court guther appearing to the that said defendant through his counsel Mr. R. B. McLaughlin voluntarily withdraws said appeal: ih sd; thererere, eroered sua Suis by the Court that said cause be and the same 13 hereby dismissed and it is further ordered and adjudged that the ietendant pay the cost of said action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Superior Court. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina , In the Superior Court Iredell County. October Term 19135. (. A, Simms vs, JUDGMENT. aC. ¥. Simpson This cause coming on at this term of the Court before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. It appearing to the Court that the defendant is not present and that the plaintiff is asking for a trail in this case. It is, therefore, on motion of the ‘efendants counsel adjudged that the action be dismissed and that the plaintiff have hdgnent for the sum adjudged to be due in the judgnent recovered in ¥. J. Lazenby, 1? Court, and interest, together with the cost of this action to be taxed by the ‘lek of this Court. B. F. Long; Judge Presiding. This Honerale Court takes an adjournment until 9:30 A. M. Friday Oct 25, 1915. Judge Presid ing. oon) : | | } ! Hl | FRIDAY OCTOBER 24, 1913. This Honorable Court meets according to adjournment at 9:50. A. M. No. 36 Harold Alexander by his next fried Neil P. Alexander vs. Trial continued over from yesterday. City of Statesville. No. 40 Statesville Brick Co VS. Statesville Gas Co. The following jury; J. F. Raymer, W. C. Wooten, C. A. Westmorels H. C. Summers, J. L. Waugh, W. ©. Hayes, Will P. Bost, R. Be Cook, J. L. Austin, 4, % Miller, E. F. Stewart, and A. S. MeKay being sworn and empanelled for their verdict say they find the issues submitted to them as follows: l--Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? Answer: $595.94 with interest Jany 25th 1912. 2- Did plaintiff file the lien of records on the records of Iredell? Answer: Yes. Southern Railway Company. The following jury; C. B. Miller, E. F. Stewart, H. ¥, will J. L. Austin, R. B. Cook, Will P. Bost, W. C. Hayes, J. L. Waugh, H. C. cunmeticgseeh Westmoreland, ¥. C. Wooten and L. L. Troutman being sworn and empanelled for their ¥ say they find the issues submitted to them as follows: 1--Was plaintiffs team injured by negligence of defendant as alleged in the complaint! Answer: Yes. 2--If so, what damage has plaintiff sustained? Answer: 5250. robert Steele, eriis In Superior Court October Term 1913. paul ine Eccles by her next friend, Will Eccles against JUDGMENT. alias, Robert Holmes, This action coming on to be heard at this term of the court before His yonor, Be Fe Long, Judge, and the parties having compromised their differences, by come of all parties and their attorneys, that this is an action for breach of promise of marriage %0 recover damage fro breach of promise of marriage and for seduction under promise of marriage; that a writ of attachment was issues in this action anu under said attachment levy ¥"S made on the lands of the defendant and his personal property seized. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the plaintiff Pauline Eccles, recover of the defendant Robert Steele, alias Robert Holmes, the sum of One liundred and Fifty Dollars and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. It is further considered and adjudged that this judgment, by virtue of the levy of attachment in this action, is a specific lien, from date of said levy of attachment, which levy is duly docketed on the judgment docket of this court, on thirty acre tract of land described in the return of the sheriff of said warrant of attachment and his certificate of levy, as appears on said judgment docket; that said attachment is discharged as to the personal property of defendant and the 8 acre tract of land, This judgment of compromise is in full settlement of a note of Will eccles to Robert Steele, alias Holmes of $50.00 dated___—_—s1911~., and also of an account of Mill Becles against the defendant of $34.40 for harvesting and threshing wheat, 3 sacks of fertilizer, feed and care of hogs, binding and hauling wheat, and the judgment aforesad, is to be credited with the difference between the account and the note aforesaid, viz; 121,00 leaving a balance due on said judgment of $129.00. This judgment is a full witlement >nd compromise of all claims and demands of Pauline Eccles anc vill Eccles ‘galnst the defendnat growing out of the alleged seduction and breach of promise and ‘le of a1 other clains and demands between said parties. Be. F. Long, Judge Etc. a cca LA ALLEL ALOE S oe | | North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. October Term 1913. J. A. Munday vs. JUDGMENT. James Church. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Henor, 8, Pp, Long, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the following issues having been submitted ‘aks found by the jury: lst. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff and if so in what sum? Answeri Pifty Dollars and interest. 2-- Is the plaintiff indebted to the defendant in their counter claims and if so in what sum’ Answer: Twenty Five Dellars. " It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of *45,00 with interest on said sum from October 20, 1913 until paid and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. It is further considered and adjudged that the above judgment is @ specifif lien upon the property described in a certain chattle mortgage executed by James Church to J, A. Munday on the 6th day ef February 1911, and registered in book 45, page 103, in the office of the Register of Deeds of Iredell County said preperty being described in said mortgage as follows: "One Goodelle 24 inch plainer ( I this day bought of him) also my entire saw mill outfit and all fixtures belonging to. game and any other machinery that may be attached to same, It is further ordered and adjudged that the defendat's equity of redemption de in said property is hereby foreclosed; that unless this judgment is paid in full wlin- ten days, R. T. Weatherman, a commissioner hereby appointed for that purpose, shall takt charge of said property and aft r advertising the same for twenty days, 5 in said more provided, shall sell said property at public auction for cash to the highest bidder #n report his preceedings to this court for further orders. B. F. Leng, Judge Presiding. In the Superior Court Octeber Term 1913. ad JUDGMENT. 1, He yore P, be yeore This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His tenor B, Be aa. Judge Presiding ana a jury, and the jury having found the first issue submit td in faver of the plaintiff, and that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the gun of as hundred and sixty dollars, with interest thereon at six per cent from the 6th day sf Yarch 1911, and having found the second issue submitted in favor of the defendants, and that the plaintiff is indebted to said defendants in the sum ef Seventy five dollars by counter-clainm: It is, therefore, censidered and adjudged that W. P. Morten recever of 1, #, Moore and F. L. Meore the sum ef $160 together with interest thereon at six per cent from the said 6th day of March 1911 subject te a credit of $75 as allewed by the jury. It is further censidered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the cests of thia actien to be taxed by the Clerk. B. F. Leng; Judge Presiding. State v8. Rebert. Steele, ‘lies Revert Holmes. It is ordered by the ceurt that sci fa and capias net issue in this case if the defendant comes into céurt and gives bend within 30 days. Larceny. Bend fixed in this case by the court as $150. State vs. Walter Benge and es E. A. Gregery. Rd Gregory is not present in Ceurt, and the Seliciter has len since departed the court, and the criminal decket ended some three or four ta m during the time, this case cemes in as a new case developed during the term and x, the Solicitor left. But the defendant Benge confesses his fault at the first eppertuni The Court has not time now to investigate this matter, but allows metion fer judgment to be entered and continued upon cenditien that the defendant Benge pays his cest up this time and enter into @ bend to ceme into Ceurt at the next term and abide the | judgment ef the court. The Court erderes that a subpeena be issued for the State's witnesses in this case. The matter is epen for judgment and te be inquired ef, This Honorable Court takes and adjournment until 10 A. M. Saturday Oct 25, 1915. f? 28 Mahe gh a Oe Dn Se Judge Presiding. i court meets according to ajournemnt at 10 A. M. ro. 56 spac ® nel Alexander by his next friend %. Neil P. Alexander vs. city of statesville. Trial continued over from yesterday. The jury heretofore sworn and emapnelled for their verdict say they find the issues submitted to them as follows, te-wit: ist. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint? Answer: No. Tpon the coming in of the verdict in this case, the plaintiff moves. to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence. Motion is denied and plaintiff aaeepix excepts. Plaintiff moves fer a new trial for erros committed by the court as appears in the face of the record, and that he has assigned in statement of the case on appeal- Judgment according to verdict. Plaintiff excepts and appeals te the Supreme Court- notice of appeal is waived in epen court. Appe.l bond of $40.00 is adjudged suf- ficient. By aggreement ef counsel, the appealant is allowed forty days in which te serve statement of case on appeal, and appellee is allowed 40 days thereafter in whcih except or serve counter case. Q. F, Bell V8. Souther R ailway Company. Upom the coming in of the verdict the defendant moves for a new trial, Motion denied, and defendant excepts-Judgment-Defendant excepts. Appeal to the Supreme Court--Notice of appeal waived in epen court- Bend fixed at Twenty Five Dellars and is adjudged sufficient. By censent of the attorneys the defendait is allowed forty days in which to serve statement of case on appeal, and they plaintiff is allowed forty days thereafter in whicn to except or serve ceunter case. T ‘ ‘ orrence vs, R. H, Ramsey. Upon the coming in of the verdict, the defendnant moves fo ra new trial--Motion denied-- and defendant excepts. Judgment--Defendant emcepts. A ppeal te the Supreme Court, Notice of appeal waived in epen Court. Bond fixed at Thi "ty Dellars and is adjudged sufficient. By consent ef counsel the defendant is al lowed Sixty days in which te serve statement ef case on appeal, and the plaintiff \s allowed forty days thereafter in which te except er serve counter case. 7 pha vs. “ Johnson will enter inte a bend for Tyre dehnson. 100.00 to appear twelve menthe from now and show his good behavior, and especially that he has not used besa be 7 disposed of | any liquor and he is to pay a fine of $15 and cest,. State VS. Jim Tilford, after the departure of the Pam Morrison and In this case at this time, Seliciter, J. C. Brookshire makes affidavit appearing in the recerd upon this affidayi; counsel MR Bristol fer Pam Morrison moves that the funds referred to in the affidavit b refunded to Brookshire, for the reason wet out in the affidavit, who paid the money for | Pam Norrison, Motion is continued until the next criminal term, to the end that the Solicitor may be present in Court, and in the meantime the court directs the clerk to u a report in the case to the next term with regard te the items referred te in the affidavit to the end that the Court may make such erder as it may deem proper, State Vs. Turner Caine, This defendant having in this case paid fifty dellars to the use of ti vounty and all expenses in the Case amount to about Ferty Dellars . The sentence in thy case is changed fro» twelve months on the roads te feur months on the roads in consider ation of this Ninety Dollars, The $50.00 may be applied by the Board of County Comiss ers as they may see proper towards the expenses of this term ef court. North Carolina, October Term 1913 Tredell County. P, R. Houpe and J, M. Adams vs. Nelsette Lumber Company. )RDER, This eause coming On before the undersigned at this term, and being debated by counsel representing the different parties, upon the motion ef the defendants vacate the receivership by P,P. Dulin; Tt is considered ey the court after censidereing the whele recerd and es argument of counsel, that the said motion be and the same is hereby denied, and receiver herekytefore the further @ppointed is continued in his dutiesp until . this ceurt. Te this order the defendant excepted, B, BP, Long, Judge Fifteenth Judicial District. ee orth Carelina, tredell County. sandler, and others. In the Superier Court July Term 1913, b. Soom te ORDER, ‘tnien Grocery Supply Company. This cause coming on to be heard befere the undersigned on the Pleadings and the whole recerd, including the report of the Referee, and the exceptions thereto filed by the defendant and after hearing argument ef counsel: It is considered ana adjudged by the Court that the excestions filea by the defendant from One to Seven inclusive be and the same are hereby overruled, It is further considered and adjudged that the findings of facts found by the Referee be and the same are hereby ratified and approved, And it is further con- sidered and adjudged that his conclusions of lay as set out in thaxregard his repert are approved, It 1s further considered that the case be continued to the end that the Court may have before it the facts te enable it to make proper order for compensation of Receiver and also for the Referee, To the foregoing order the defendant excepts. B. F. Long, Judege presiding. ‘orth Carolina, Superior Court Iredell County. — October Term 1913, ', H. And Grier Hunter Order as to time of filing report and exceptions, V8e the Thite Company. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term ef the vourt efore His Honor 4, ¥. Leng, Judge presiding and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the receivers have becinning been unable to file their report ten days before the ef this term of court, or during the term: It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that said receivers be allowed l ° dave after tern in which te make up and file said report as of this term, It is further erdered and adjudged that crediters whose claims have been ‘ted be allowed ‘hirty days after said report is filed in which to file exceptions, It is further "eptiong te their report “vend pon Such claims ag “ote they must re sil Settling up the receivership. %, ordered that said receivers, after the time for filing has expired, may in their discretion pay a pro rata are allowed and to which no exceptions have been filed. ‘ain in their hands a sufficient sum to cover all disputed claims North Carolina, In the Superier Court Iredell County. October Term 1915. It appearing to the Court that John B, Glover, Its» has presented in a license to practice law issued by the Supreme Ceunrt of North Carolina, ar Court, at the request of Zeb. V. Long, Atty. administered to him the oath te: support Constitution of North Carolina, the oath to support the Constitution of the Unites States and the oath of an Attorney: a It is, therefore, considered and ordered by the Court that the said aie 2 Glover, Jr., be admitted and he is hereby admitted to the practice of the profession of of law in all the courts of the state of North Carolina. It is further ordered by the Court that a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread upon the minutes of this Court. x B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. October Term 1915. oe. Beit Se JUDGMENT. Southern Railway Company. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the court before His Honor, B. F. Long, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record, It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the plai tiff & f. Bell recover of the defendant, the Southern Railway Company the sum ef $250.00 (Peo Hundred and Fifty Dollars) with interest from October 13th 19135 until paid and the cos! of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Dp B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, Iredell County. Superior Court. Dr. F. L. Sharpe vs. Kincad Furniture Compamy. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, B. F. Leng» compromised their differences: It is adjudged that the plaintiff Ff. L. Sharpe reco _, Purniture Co., One Hundred Dollars and cost of this action, B. F. Long, Hort’ Carol tne re: ats “In the, Superior Court Ootoder orb, P : tet Bf JUDGMENT. ae Statecville, 5 + gis ceuse coming on. to be heard, and being heard at the October Term,1915, of the Superior Court of ‘Tredell County, before His Honor B.F. long, Judge presiding and @ Jury, und the jury having answered the issues submitted to tm themnss follows: . Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the Complaint? t Answer Bo." It is, therefore, considered. and agjudged. by the Court that the plaintiff recover nothing by this action, and that the said plaintiff pay the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. B.F. Long, Judge Presiding. Jorth Carolina Superior Court Iredell County October Term,19135. T.D. Miller, et al { vB i J UDGMENT. ¥.A. Summers. : i “This cause’ toning on ti’ be heard et this term of the Court before His Honor B.F. Long, Judge: Presi ding, end the plaintiffs having voluntarily teken 8 non suit. It is therefore, considered end adjudged that they pay the costs of ta action to be taxed by the Clerk. ! ; B.F. Long, Judge Presiding. Superior Court tredel1 County doh ms: Sherpe 1, Tomlin October Term,1915. JUDGME ET. * bi th i Pe ‘This cause comin on to be heard aa this term of the Supers or Comt 4g Honor, B.F. Long, Judge Epeat sing and the plaintiff heving teken fon suit; N mst ee tis Aa stherefere comigenes end stautget that they pay the costs oft 166 he Superier Court North Carolina, In the Sup b Term 1915. Iredell County. October age ey It appearing to the Court that John B. Glover, Jr., has presented in open cour a license to practice law issued by the Supreme ceunrt of North Carolina, and ‘hat the Court, at the request of ‘eb. V. Long, Atty. ‘administered to him the oath te Sal Constitution of North Carolina, the oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the oath of an Attorney: It is, therefore, considered and ordered by the Court that the said Jehn B, Glover, Jr., be admitted and he is hereby admitted to the practice of the profession of of law in all the courts of the state of North Carolina. It is further ordered by the Court that a record of the proceedings taken herein be spread upon the minutes of this Court. 7 B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. October Term 1915. Bell VSe Southern Railway Company. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the court before His Honor, Bb. F. Long; Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury having answer the issues in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record. It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the plai. tiff @ i Bell recover of the defendant, the Southern Railway Company the sum of 5250.00 (Pw Hundred and Fifty Dollars) with interest from October 13th 1915 until paid and the cf of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. | B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina, Iredell County- Superior Court. Dr. F. L. Sharpe vs. Kincad Furniture Compamy. r @ ant * This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, B. F. LOnés salt : wing jury and the jury having answeee the issues as set out in record and the parties : compromised their differences: It is adjudged that the plaintiff F. L. Sharpe recover of the 4 -Purniture Co., One Hundred Dollars and cost of this action. B. F. Long, Judge Presiding. $ “ggeth ero} as A In the °uperior Court sredel2 County October Term,1913 S hae garola Alexender by — splend,ile3-?- Alexander | | . : vs , ie IJV DGCHE ie city of Statesville, Tis ceuse coming On to be heard, and being heard at the October Term,1915, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, before His Honor B.F. Long, Judge presiding and & Jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to th themas follows: "Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the iefendant as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Ho." It is, therefore, considered and agjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover nothing by this action, and that the said plaintiff pay the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of this Court. B.F. Long, Judge Presiding. Jorth Carolina Superior Court Iredell County October Term,1913. T.D. Miller, et al i v8 } J UDGMENT. W.A. Summers. j This cause toning on to be heard et this term of the Court before His Honor B.F. Long, Judge Presiding, and the plaintiffs having voluntarily taken @ non suit. It is ,therefore, considered end adjudged that they pay a, gente OF OS action to be taxed by the Clerk. B.F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County October Term,1915. John W. Sharpe TI. Tomlin . vs wv This oc Ss j Cow t be ause comin on to be ward at thie term of the Super oe fore His Honor, B.F. Long, Judge Presiding, and the plaintiff having tekes * Yoluatary non suit: It is ,therefore considered and adjudged that they pay the costs of t this section to be taxed by the Clerk. B.F. Long, Judge Presiding. Torth Carolina Superior Court October Term,1913. envenomed Honor, B.F. Tong, Judge, and it appearing that the defendant yi te the plaintiffs the amount demanded, viz: Eighty Bollars ang thet" intereet on “ighty Dollars from the 13th day of February, 1913: ana ie further appearing that the defendants replevied the prop rty olafmed ty t, plaintiff and executed their bond therefor in the sum of One Hundred gag Sixty Dollars with as surety: : It is ,therefore, considered and adjudged chat the platntits : ox the defendants and gure y. on paid reple: af ‘ sum of One Hundred and Sixty Dollars to be discharged upon the ao ot ¢ Eight $80. 00 and interect on $80.00 from ‘February 13, 913, unti peda and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. a a B.F. Long,dudge Presi ding. North Varolina Iredell] County In the Superior Court October Term,1913. P.S. Torrence vs JUDG MEST. R.H. Ramsey i This cause coming on to be heard at this term by His Honor, BF, 1 anda jury and being heard and the jury having answered the issues ag set. ont to wit: Is the defendent indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? Answer $147.00 Is the plaintiff indebted to the defendant b: counter claim or payments , and if so, in what amount? A. Answer: $53.00 Is the nlaintiff's clair barred by the Statute of Limitations ? 4 Answer: Wo. It is ,therefore, ordered and adjudged that the pleintif f recover. of tr defendant the sum of $94.00 with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum until] pagd and the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Oct. 22,1913, B.F. Long, Judge Presiding. North Yarolina In the Superior Court Iredell County October Term,1913. Statesville Brick Company { vs JUDGMENT. Statesville Gas Company i This cauce coming on to be heard at thus term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before Hig Honor,B.F. Long, Judge Presiding, and a jury, am the following issues having been submitted and. answ Hind by tho Jury to- wit: Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, an 1% 80 in what amount? Answer. $595.94 with interest from January 26th ,1912. Did plaantiff file the lien of record in the records of Iredell? Answer: Yes.” It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that plaintiff? recov? v ‘ plain of the defendant the sum of $595.94 with the legal rate of tnterest thereos from the @6th day of January,1912, until paid. teaethes with the cpats of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. : Por ” : It further appearing that the yey Plaintiff filed its notice of lien office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of said County on the 26th day & August, 1912, against the roal estate of the defendant set forth in seid. notice of lien ana the complaint in this actionss et It is, therefore cons‘dered and ad and costs & : ; dg t said judgement be and the same are hereby dec] oa i oe . roe 4a property. on the said 28th day of Angost isis. " Seeeeete tien sae re ee B.F. Long, Judge Presiding. This Honorable Court adjourns sine die, Judge Preg$ai ng. * Borth Carolina Iredell County Be it remembered that a Superior Court begun and held in end for Iredell County on the Pifth Monday efter the first Monday the same being the 26th day of January ,1914, ro When and where his Hono? WsP. Harding is ptesent and presiding - »- and Honorable *.C. Hammer Solicitor present and presecuting in the name of the State. J.M. Deaton, the High Sheriff of Iredell County ,returned into open Court the names of the following good and lawful men to serve ais jurors tor the first week of this term, to wits. H.J. Murdock, J.¥. Cook, Jesse Winecoff, D.M. Bostian. J-R. Brawley, E.R. Rufty, C.L. Tomlin, J.4. Fox, T.L. Moore, M.P.. Godfrey, C.l. Kerr, £.S. Smith, 6.”. Baity, R.W. Litton, H.B. ' Gollins, Julias Hl Wakgh,' J.B. Shoemaker, Geo. ”. Harris, Joe Sprinkle,J.I. Thomas, T.M. Richart, J.Ri Tucker, J.M. Sharpe, J.C. Pieree, C.A. Stewart, H.B. Bost, 7.A. Byers, %.A. White, N.R. White, A.A. Sherrill, T.R. Ervin, ¥.S. Sherrill and ¥.V. Thomas. T.R. Ervin and ".S, Sherrill, returned not found. E.S. Smith returned dead. : The following good and lswful men were drawn as Grand Jurors . for the term: ' G.W. Batty, Julius H. Waugh, Joe Sprinkle, M.P. Godfrey, d.B, Shoemaker, u.K. Melchor, C.¥. Stewart, D.A. Bostian, J.R. Brantley, w.a. Williford, W.A. Byers, J.R. Tucker, Geo, ¥. Harris, 7-R. Pieroe, W.A, White, H.B. Bost, .M. Richart and C.L. Kerr. G.”. Baity was sworn as foreman of the Grand Jury. 9.C. Thompsog was sworn as officer of the grand jury. The foilowing good and lawful men are sworn as Petit Jurors: ’ for the first. week. Of- thin! term: H.R. White, 2.1, Moore, Allen F. Brown, R.W. Litton, Jia Pox, AsAs Sherril), £.R, Rufty, J.W. Cook, H.¥. myiee and W.¥. Thomas and JM, Sharpe, J.I.| Thomas, Jesse %. Yinecoff , g -Bo, 2. State 3 | Rude conduct at Church vs B.P. W.L. Henry Thoms i i tite @fpenea i i i euerere: ¥ Ressult Deadly Weepon ' B.P.W.L.