Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDivorce Records 1855-1913 Templeton-Whiteeuer fucjeTdmey "SA yueiy ‘uojeTduey | toa Caratiam” ) by leu bupeonton. Chisudm. Gorauk DI uuaplila., Maiubyy , ag bau Veceeflalon, —_— : Ce flacieljy, —* Aced ite -ee a oe : esi, aocene <a eet cago, Teak SR: Leal LarcE ee hiraceec pc aed he eK, wee O eck Wee fncuftltttch? ti Bek gtcac # ec € K gs oS ~ @ cr ° s dl = qQ g @ SA yuery ‘uozeTduey, iy f, 181, py DIY CO Pere Ff are ope erry GWG i Gropp yr SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C Odell .County.-- Gn the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina. To the Sheriff of... le Sd aE County--GREETING: Pou are Hereby COMMANDED to summon... eee — Z ee @Q = ° P or > ‘SA “W "f ‘uoo]dwI9 7 Cl6l and_appear before the fates of the defendant....above named, if. 4/ff4...be found within your Ld, Ga wee at the Court House in our Superior Court, at a Court to be my. for t mo of Mone the chs Ce ee Monday after the... . f SS. Monday GE Sonne aes the same being the - Zz t day of.. which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three they fail to answer to the said complaint days of said Term, and let said Defendant... take notice if within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this ~ paatsoay “OF [QVasNnyoy "31798 HOd SNOWWAS © y - Ua ‘uoja[duo | SA ‘Vv _ ‘uo}a] duro | “AMMIONY SHAE Cl6l SI} aM aroyaq peqiiosqns pue OF TIOMS ‘sHOTjNoexe wO0Iy yduIexa Ayxodoid pure sariiiqety ‘siqep siy eaoqe pue IaA0 sie[[op pespuny om} Jo wins ot} qqJom st ay shes WIOMS Su1eq seh ee hier oe sit} ‘seas pue Spuey INO Sout MA ‘goljoe siqy ar yuqure[g 24} Jo 1eAooas Avmr “yO Bpaezeq 24} SB S00 guurera O43 Ft ‘eaamoy juepusyeq oy} *Ayanod ‘yunod Jowedng 24} UI \ ‘¥YNINONVO HLYON JO aAL¥YLS SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. —........@ounty.-- Gn the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. To the Sheriff of Wou are hereby bpp to sum —j = 2 & o B Se E ‘SA “Y “f ‘Uoja]dua | Cl6l ¥Siperior Court for said County, within the first three they fail to answer to the said complaint days of said Term, and let said Defendant..........take will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Within, that time, the plaintiff Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. Clerk of , OF ajquuanyey ‘431134 HO SNOWWNS ara! — jo yANOD ‘oLedng 243 jo LSNIVOV “AauIOWYV Syyareld — Z - @ See ° - 2) oe “SA ‘Vv , ‘uo}a] duro | Cl6l siq} ‘s[eas pue spuey Ino SseuyM juRpuejed 4} SB 3809 Buareyd 24} Ft ‘eAomoy juepusyeq ay} *Ayanod ‘yunod sJotedng 24} UT ‘ ‘¥NITONVYO HLUON AO aL¥LS Summons For Relief—Clerk—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. County.--9n the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. o 3 & ° Pp cs oe ‘SA “Y "f ‘Uoja]dura | cl6l of the Superior Court for the County of ) n the 30 Le day 7 and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the S 4perior Court for said County, within: / 1 dee from the date of this summons, and let. -.{ail to answer to the said complaint at that time, the plaintiff...will apply for the relief demanded take notice that if. in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this J AL Colhe Superior Court ot HCA Mcounty. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF Returnable within................ scene ...days into the office of ‘the Clerk of the Superior Court Plaintiff's A. Templeton, J. A. vs. Templeton, Ella 1912 nee = - oO = o F i cl6l ‘SA “VW ‘f ‘uojadura | Nertk Carolinas, In The Superior Court,August Termm,1911, Tredell Qeunty. J.A, Templeton VB. Jlla Templeton, dk ae The plaintify,complaining of the defendant alleges: First. That the said J.A.Yempleton iniermarried with the defendant, Zlla Yempleton,on or abeut May 15,1909,accerding te tke laws of [redell Jounty,Nerth Jarolina,and thet they lived tepetker as Man anc wile for a peried of abeut three monthas,whsn the said defendant, lla Templeton, abanconed the said plaintiff,J.A.Templeton,ef her om accerd and witkout excuse or corpulsion om the part eof the said plaintifi and Without kis fault and has lived separate and apart from him since trat time. Second. iti she abandened tke said plaintiri that since the s@id defendant + * 5 i; 7? lultery,and taat on or adour Jaw 15 19H sas Committed fornication and ad eke gave birth te an illegitimate child net the child ot the plaintiiz. Taerevore tas pkaintiff prays the ceurt te grant an order divor- n his wite,Blla Terpleten,absaclutely and cing: tha said J.A4. Templeton Irer test tao costs im tkis cease be taxed — z = @ = ° - i > clél ‘SA “Y “f ‘Woyaydura 7 J.A, Templeton ARV IT DAY I es Vs. Zlla Lempheton J. A.Templeten being duly sworn deposes and says: That the facts forth in the feregeing cenplaint are true «bf kis own knowledge except gpev Lol» as te tacee matters stated taerin ex infermatienm and belief and as te those he believes it te be true;ihat he kas filed thas complaint met eut ef cellu- sien between him aud the maid defendant, but im sincerity and trutk for tke Causes set eut in the complaint;that tke suid lacts save existed to his knowledge for re than six montas prier te the bring of this action; and that ke amd the said Blla Templetou kave resided in this a? on = etate for mer than two years next preceding the bringing of this action. (PP 3v>scribed and sworn te before me, this the 3Otk a Glerk Superior Ceurt. Templeton, J. A. vs. Templeton, Ella 1912 a ‘ ‘ oO CAROLINA, | In the Superior Court. - Ns — County. f wers vs, Bettie Flowers. bere e pamed will | One YEAR, ie TCE The defendant isa $1x MONTH take notice that an action entitled 9 jn THree MQ -POT0D ; 3 yeuoyyeu eXB} 0} JROGe ote OM J} Sse SHOOT pue ufese pee seul0d plo oy} OFUT ml} o a got s o 5 ee) oy ‘SA “YW “f ‘uoyaydurs | C161 SERVICE BY PUBLICATION—NO-| FO ait GT . ig ite AALTY Af CO ae t Vi AF ADVERTISING | 1 ncaa RATES Subsrripti ' —— et CAROLINA, | In the Superior Court. . , ‘ Iredell County. § ; ; - ON YEAR,| Jim Flowers vs. Bettie Flowers. ‘ : uz ee NOTICE.—The defendant above named will = - 7 a0 : i RNISHE Six MONTi| take notice that an action entitled af-B°"fy R. R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR: FU i -payuo0d poos se ue], U gpl igealike eae oneg A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY: i oe 2} 0} JNOge oI OM JI se SHOOT <== pue ufese peoyseuoy Plo eyy out pal j= ee a THree M 1 ld ‘uoja}duia | SA “V “f ‘uoja{duId | Cl6l Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Salewille,, NE. hayes a P ‘ee BY a ATION—NO- —_—C—— = LANDMARK marie a Subscript —- ORTH CAROLINA, | In the Superior Court. Iredell County. ‘ One ae Jim Flowers vs, Bettie Flowers. NOTICE.—The defendant above named will c Six MONTI take notice that an action enue at Bbof, - R. R. CLARK, BaPKleTah ‘ FURNISHED e Tunce M@| 7b8sU0D Dood se we | “woWulUs ON APPLICATION — t ye joydvo [euCTyeU ey} jo O81 ICE-A- -WEEK: TUESDAY ANO FRIDAY: 2 ee aye} OF INoge are om J} Se SHOOT ~ N - j aie SSeS SSS SSE poeta ee = 2M oe thesia tob=as | SOO q ios uTese peoysom0y PIO ou} cont 04 Dp : a i are = _ Pa ‘uojafduia | SA “VY ‘f ‘uojayduua y Cl6l Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally [SERVICE BY PUBLICATION— ATION—NO-| aE LANDMARK ™ | or RATES y Subscript} — CAROLINA, | In the Superior Court. eel County. FURNISHED |» One vehi) Jim Flowers vs, Bettie Flowers NOTICE.—The defendant above named wil C R. R. CLARK, apap Kieren . ON APPLICATION | S1X MONTI| take notice that an action entitled 96 arf, 2 | THREE ‘t PSTD PoOe se uel a | joudeo TeUOTZeU OU} JO es1e 2 aye} 0} oge ore om JT SE SHOOT 1CE-A- ON reas. CIR Ne AND FRIDAY. BI “Uojatdua | SA “Y “f ‘uoiajduto ] CI16I ‘Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Salewille, NC. ut 9 A a M. (co ter [darby gt @ . ‘SERVICE BY PUUBLICATION-NO- | = ——— Xess = LAN DMARK DR. ADVERTISING | RATES 3 Subsrript hy —_—_—— mil NOR CAROLINA, | In the Superior Court. Iredell County. ONE YEAR,| Jim Flowers vs, Bettie Flowers. NOTICE.—The defendant above named will || six MONTI hen that an action entitled ahorfy 4 R. R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR ‘i FURNISHED THREE me -peguod Sige se we | oer 1 ON APPLICATION — ye jozdeo TeuoyyeU oUF jo esie Boe) p, aye} 0} INoGe 9x8 OM J] SY SHOOT ICeE-A-WEEK: phe emmeenb ANDO a ares i % jeu urese peoysom0y PIO OU} ojuy pape SSS = SSS 2 QAR AA TOL. a09 ae Pep ary rt Se ~ Cade e C . BI “Uojafdwia | SA “VY “f “Uojajdua | CI6I Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally éialy Pepe's dP ba ie: aie Bouse _yawghas hang ou: ster: chi rome TB Ae. Ofna) HE bceks ee fae a 1i-weekly newb oF publistied abStatesilieAs .& ; a x SY gyice (week for Tot : 1 advertisement appeared | in "said, p Pei on a aa bk eh acim awe pect : eculive Weeks. | Gap Ot: act ES ae ie a of nto and subscri@ed before ™ Swgi bs the Zot me o = a o - o 7 Oy SA “V ‘f ‘uoja]dua | Cl6l Ss ereitily gopedt 4 before: rid . a ee De boa sien 7 a : hs ¢} i's a. -. ie et. 4 or yrho,, éing Fury swe. - de 4 e Tub LANRBMABS, % aly newspaper # plished av Stafesviliets & wwesk “for tour I ver rlisement appeared it in said pay pet yi ae We < af Ba te + js eter ture ‘ et cael of jiged betore me a hast A oo bik efO & BI “Uojadura | SA ‘Wf ‘uoqaydura | C161 Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally vellied befste rng Peo Oe he . & pega a ee “ i te SRersbnaly ee iE pha ibding yy sieges PF g Tus Liat peas veekly newsbaP sinned ar Seaeo ASG isement appea ured in said pa per gi {week ae Be ged petore ™: mee Ply woyaydua 1 SA “y ‘f ‘uojajdua 7 CI6l “Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally peared Before mig i re Che . eb? s... te ‘ jPersbnally ae iL. yoyphay being Guy ewernyj 28 Wet | + a - ekly newsbaper Fob lished avStatesvilie/ts G3 oc adveytisement 4 ppear din said. p a per bce a week for Toe eax a > week i ee ees Pry A ree ea Fd bas *Y ec hetore THe wn ee dal of , BI “Uoja]dura | ‘SA ‘V “cy * f “uoja;dua | C16l Ppiease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally : Peporr rg WS Pergbnally appears d Before me 8h - no ee. 5. : ek. st “ D2" 4 ~~ yewpho, being Guy 5% BI “Uojaydua | 'SA“W "ft ‘uojaydura Cl6I ‘Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally 2 Be ee taper Oyurt Vihy. Gerad 14M. A /; 0 2eriew Ware the flail, ach the clifinhant— par =| teed OO cachdidee~ tee?’ —- cH AW Foe | J Z ak @ aa ° - sz} > ‘SA “VY “f ‘Uojo]duID | Cl6I Templeton, J: A. vs. Templeton, Ella 1912 5-15-’07-2M. Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF uu Zon ne Z = oO — o - m7 > “SA ‘Vv t ‘uoj] duro | Cl6l SJ gs 3S oa oO oo = oo FP ( — = > < & Term, 190 ge a tt Ail LA ber B ‘ cof A ' » Cl6I ah aly eee pegtania is, a, MN Se Es Ves ee . nd for sale at the CaRoLina MAgooT office, Statesville, N. C. : pacistiearates lsde Perimeter CIVIL SUBPOENA.—Printetl and for cee State of North n Carofina ’ ahh F To the Sheriff of “4.4 => _..County=-Greeting: Judge of duperior Court, ‘a ‘he next Court pi ae ‘held for our said county at nersoually to aueest 1 before the j wey LZ ‘ A. a et mg MZ 2, LGL%. Ane the Court House in:... Mbeki Pt er _J™ Monday to say in behalf of... JX YF - next, then and there to testify and the truth and then and there to be tried, wherein......... Ete oversy before said Court depending, And this you shall in no wise omit, under th penalty prescribed by law. Defendant.........» Clerk of our said Court, at office $0 oem — zg yc a 3 B i cy “SA ‘Vv t ‘uoja] duro | C161 Clerk Superior Court... _County. —_ S ys @ ae ° . se oo ‘SA “VY “f ‘Uoja]dura | cl6l — Z = @ a ° - S24 > CI6I ‘SA “VY ‘f ‘Uoja]duI9 | Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for salé by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. ¢ 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF.: Oude County--GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON ....... the Court House in ; on the... Exsdita Sis Mendey—afterthe. Awe next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of —_ in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein A [hug blue a Plaintiff Defendant And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. , Clerk of our said Court, at office WITNESS, Monday Nh pctade DLL. cov lerk Superior Court for... a Z - @ = o r fe » SA “VY “f ‘Uojo]duIa | Cl6l an Mit, ae os fx hie Grad Go r eZ: | Ga Templeton, J. A. vs. Templeton, Ella 1912 pus] “UIWOL ‘SA “TH “UWOL rcol SUPERIOR COURT--SUMMONS In Accordance With Chapter 66 Public Laws 1927 IREDELL COUNTY—In the Superior Court. AGAINST Ten SUMMONS FOR RELIEF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Ipnrteece County.—_GREETING: You Are Heresy COMMANDED TO SUMMONS. ¢ i oPP> Co the defendant... above named, ifecctDCnenmee De found within your County, to be and appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court, for the County of Iredell, at the Court House in Statesville, not later than THIRTY DAYS from date of service of this summons, and answer the complaint, a copy of which is hereto attached (or which will be filed in the office of Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County within the time as set out in the at- tached order) and let the said defendant... take notice that ra as fail to answer the said complaint within the time required by law the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Herein fail not and of this summons make due return. fe Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this_44 day of Pro: ) ; Vy Clérk — Court, Iredell County,/ PA my + ARNON at SP oe em ALE man ON tea ENE ARCS SIRENS AE OC gern on ere meer ZO 3a Jorpey OF suoutmng LHN00 BOLUAdAS 'TIAAHa _ LZ poy We, and each of us, acknowledge ourselves bound unto the Defendant... herein named in this action in the sum of two hundred dollars, to be void, however, if the within named Plaintiff... shall pay the defendant... all- such costs as the Defendant.... may recover of the Plaintiff... in this action. Witness our hand... and seal... this the day of » 293 (SEAL) (SEA) (SEAL) maketh oath that he is a resident of sseunsneennnennerenmenennnmnmenenned OUNtyY, North Carolina, and worth TWO HUNDRED dollars over and above all his liabilities and legal exemptions allowed by law. Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of Clerk Superior Court. eusy] “UIWO] ‘SA “TY “H “UWOL ytol vua’y “UIpWOL, ‘SA “JT “H “UYWOL reol Jyfres North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County EH, Ds fomlin vs. COMPLAINT ee ef @f ef ee Lena Tomlin The plaintiff, complainins of the defendant for cause of action, says: ist. That the plaintiff is a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina, and has been a resédent of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceding the commencement of this action. 2nd. That the plaintiff and defendant inter-married on the eoth day of December, 1905, and have since been, and are now, hus- band and wife. ord. That sometime during the month of November in the year of 1921 the defendant, of her own volition, without cause on the pert of the plaintiff, abandoned said plaintiff and since that time the plaintiff and defendant have lived separate and apart from each other; that for more than two years; that for more than five years and from tac date mentioned in the third paragraph hereof, have not lived in the marital relationship. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays for a divorce absolute from the defendant and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. af va Attorney for Pisintiit North Carolina Iredell County H. L. Tomlin, being duly sworn, deposes and says; that he has read the foregoing complaint and that the facts set forth therein are true of his own knowledge, except as to matters aud things therein stated upon information and belief, and as to those, he be- lieves it to be true. Affiant further says that the complaint is not madeZout of levity or by collusion between tie plaintiff and defendant or for the mere purpose of being separated, but in sincerity and truth, for tne eause set forth in the complaint and that the facts set forth in tne complaint as the cause of action hawe existed for more than six months next preceding the commencement of this action and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the State of North Caro- lina for more than two years next preceding — of this action. Affiant o Prev i- Sworn to and-subscribed before me, ee BL’ apy 8, 3 rk Saetiee CG. Ma, Of iredell County He L. Tomlin ¥s. Lena Tomlin COMPLAINT Tomlin, H. L. vs. Tomlin, Lena 1934 34 o 9° BB eB om oO - Bm < ¥ yt6l North C@rolina, Irddell Younty In the “uperior H. Le tomlin VSe Application to sue a a pauper Lena ,omlin to the honorable Vlerl rior .ourt of tredeli Vounty. to certify that I have examined the case of the plain- .bove-entitled action, and believe that he has a good — i Attorney. th day of October, 19353 Ss ‘ ' : % lorth Carolina, Iredell Yo nty ee ve omlin, being duly sworn, says: .That he is unable to eties, or make the deposit required by law, to enable him cute the avove-entitled action aghinst the defendant Lena } 1e6 may be allowed th sue in said end therefore prays ie hed ~ | 19535. VS. Order granting leave to 3 e sue aS a pauper. Lena +omlin North Carolina, Iredell a : s Whe eae ks superior ~“ourt. fidavit above named a pau Cle 3ristol be ass ,aay of Dur _y 19355. H/ L. Tomlin VSe - ; Lena ‘tomlin ° Application to sue as pauper @ Tomlin, H. L. vs. Tomlin, Lena 1934 —j o ° BB BE ox Br < 4 ye6l North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County , vee, Term, b# ) etd He Le tomlin VS. : ISSUES Lena Tomlin : Jury sworn and empanelled and answers the issues as follows: I Did plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged complaint? BUBWer?: a Tt Did defendant abandon and live separate and apart from the plaintiff withot any fault on his part, for more than two consecutive years next preceding the conmencement of this action as alleged in the complaint? Answer: itt Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceding the commencement of this action? Answer: ee H. Le Tomlin vs. Lena ‘omlin ISSUES Tomlin, H. L. vs. Tomlin, Lena 1934 oo BB. oe tm Bo < ¥ ye6l North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Tem, 1934 He L. Tomlin VS. $ JUDGMENT Lena Yomlin This cause coming on to be heard before his Honor, W. F. Harding, Judge Presiding and a jury, and the jury, for its verdict having answered the issues submitted to it in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record: It is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the marriage between tle plaintiff, H. L. Tom- lin and the defendant, Lena Tomlin, be, am the same is hereby dissolved and the said plaintiff is hereby granted a di- vorce absolute. Judge Presiding. H. L. Yomlin vs. Lena Tomlin JUDGMENT Tomlin, H. L. vs. Tomlin, Lena 1934 Bill of Costs—Civil—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Co. Statesville, N.C. | Original Summons, or other original process, includ- ing all names therein a = . - $1.00 Every copy of same a me 25 Filing Complaint and Affidavit 35 Filing Answers and Affidavit 35 Bond, including Justification Appeal from Justices - Appeal from Clerk to Judge Attachment Injunction Order, including Bond and Justification 1.00 Order of Arrest : - - - 1.00 Subpoena, each name-~= - “ is ~ 15 Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian Continuance - | .- i os ee ‘ Caveat to a will, entering and docketing Issuing Commision - ie of ‘ Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate Seal ps et © : Be B Motion, Entry and Record of - Notice “ - . * = - Notice, for each name over one in same paper Impaneling Jury - a s o ns Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided - a a ee = a Judgment final in term time - Bs s Judgment final before Clerk - - ee 50 Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support 50 Docketing same . - - + * ns 25 Docketing ex parte Proceedings - “ 50 Docketing Judgment “ ~ « “ 25 Docketing Summons - - 25 Indexing Judgment ee = 10 Filing Papers - - - - 10 Postage, actual - - is i Transcript of Judgment - rs ie se 25 Execution of Sheriff’s Return - - mt 50 Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal - - - - 2.00 Transcript to Supreme Court copy sheets, each .10 County Tax, when jury impaneled ~- “ a Referee’s Allowance i Sheriff - ce “ec Constable Magistrate - Plaintiff ’s Witnesses Busy] “UIpWO LT, ‘SAT 1H “UuOL reel WO CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) Tomlin, H. L. vs. Tomlin, Lena 1934 "Tq ‘Iou0] “SA “D) sOLlyeog “Jouo | Li6l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C. County—In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Garolina. To the Sheriff of IED Se ce. ge YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to summon the defendant__ above named, if A€<-_be found within your Coypty, to be and appear before the Judge of ovr Buprie. ey, at a Court to be held for thg County of & on the. S SG, y ~-Monday the-_#___.Monday, of ,. tT and) answer the complaint, a copy of Which will, be, deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three Aays, of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. the same being the x day of Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and.seal of said Court, this. <2. Elda of ) he 2 in &_ £ ee ek uspuszoq 94} 8B 4800 yous [[@ ““~-"~yuepuezeq oy} Aed Re ee ee re a we eee - - --- SP 73 i i , re ee er | SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ¢ Returnable t \ "Aqunog--~*---- 9-7-2 -- = VNVIONVS HLYON JO ALVLS Jo Avp------~~sryy our ar0zaq Peqiiosqns pue 0} u10Mg "Z4N0Q sowadngy ay} Uz ‘ANO8& ‘suo Noexe WoIZ ydutoxe Ayzodoad pue sortqery ‘siqop sty eAoqe pue z0A0 “HOT}Oe BIYZ UL ~~" PHULe[_ 04} Jo 1saa0ver Avur —-~-—~4 PO ERGE oe” San eer miner oe bok iN igh a oe Oc ee ee Aep-~--~--~s1y3 ‘s[eos pup Spuvy dno ssauziy ! ! ' ' ' ! ! ' 1 ! ! 1 i ' ' ' : ‘ i ' 1 : 1 ' { ' 1 i f ' ! ' t ! a @ me 5 oR DQ = § 5 << a > © ee RQ = S 5 ct = co S © 2 oS 8 ° a) eo = ° = = a s © mu a °, ‘PIOA Oq 04 ‘SIR TJOG~"—"~ tT mn emer nnsnennneas--<----—=39 UMS Ot} Ut ‘Woroe SIy} UT ~---;UBpuazacy ou} Se te OT St OE eR eT NTI Ne a on (Wea) ---- nwa nnn nnn nnn nn S18 Plaintiff’s Attorney. Toner, Beatrice G. vs. Toner, P. L. 1917 “T ‘qd ‘Iouo] ‘SA “D) doLyeog ‘JOU ], LI6! SUMMONS FOR RELIEFP.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C. County—In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ick icing he soca rt it~ To the Sheriff of .. £7 CELE County—GREETING : ihe YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to summon the defendant. above named, if_4*¢<be found within your Cgunty, to be and appear before the Judge of our Saperior Court, at a Court to be held for thg County of wEt¢"[<€-S<=ec_, at the Coyrt House in eacO. the... the... 4.._.Monday af ude ee or an and answer the complaint, a copy,of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superlor Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if.4$¢__they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due yoturn, // _ a Gayot. _- Bec tiven under my hand and seal of said Court, this,.& sumby oyUN PUG SoAjesiMo eSpayMouyoe oy VNYVIONVI HLYON AO ALVLS nnOD. ee | ‘ANO8& I6T >>To rnnnnnnnsa-== Jo ABP-~-~-—-SIY} BUT e1OJoq peqizosqns pus 0} UI0Mg ‘suOI}ndexe WoIy ydurexe Ajzodord pue sarzTIqeT] ‘s}qap sty eAoqe pue 1940 “HOT}OR SIG} Ul ~~~" ~“HUUIe[_Y ey} Jo 1aa0001 ABUL ~-~--~yuepuazoq oy} se 4800 “Z4NOQ 4OVsadngy ayR Uz Tt h6L <a BW oooh ae ORO, Bote Nee eke bay apa Re Aspr 777777 am ‘s[ves pus Spuey INO ssoujzt “pIoA 9q 0} MR ee er ee UNS 94} UI ‘ao1j08 Sty} Ul ~~~~jUBpuejeq 94} yous [[@ ~-~----yuepuezeq oy} Aed ee cee re i ns 04} Jt ‘1aAQMOY ' ' : ' ' ! ! ! ' 1 i 1 ' t 1 ' ! t ! ! ! t ' ' ' ' ! ' { i ' “Zz Oo g. S 08 a2 = 3 a} 5 oo DR > @ cas a = 3 5 co me co > ® n S B ° Lac) co = S > = 5 a Le] oD au Qu ° = o ef ~”m TRO eaten see ett el ean a> Clee) en ee soe eee nae CRO Oe re a eee Plaintiff’s Attorney. f Toner, Beatrice G. vs. Toner, P. L. 1917 “ ° 3 oO - ~ r = S @ .* w @ © co = 5 ° @ @) < Li6l Zab Cae N. C.- IN ——<G (04 TATESVI LE eSieniri NEL PUBLISHED ater ED VERY THURSDAY MORNING CIRCULATES AMONG THE S&sT vhoeem OF THIS AND ADJOINING COUNTIES ESTABLISHED 1892 i i j ADVERTISING RATES ARE REASONABLE. IT WILL BRING You RETURNS ———————S—S—S[SS—SS——————SS——_—————— SS aSSaFV>PVP__— CHESS 2s ue oe A Brath/ 1 Or 1W@ Statesville, N. CG. mm Gili CGsmnw 7 IN ACCOUNT WITH North Carolina, | In the § ; STATESVILLE SENTINE Iredell County, Superior Court, [| oe a oenaary Pere, 1917. PUBLISHED eatrice G. Toner, P] eS fear ielintnes NOMICE. | “VERY THURSDAY MORNING The defendant above named will take no- that an action entitled as above has cic een commenced in the Superior Court of |} COUN j oe County. for the dissolution of the; frisinc RATES ARE REASONABLE. =| —— required to a th: Monday be- H fore the first » onda: re — Notice! V4 IT WILL BRING YOU RETURNS y in March; 1917, the same being the 29th da > a y of January, 1917,| “et Ovxicx AS avcerce * the Court House in Iredell Count : : Q\ : ‘arolina, and answer or demur to the com- ; <> ge ra Tot ae a plaint in said action, or the “plaintif? sill x< - ors Aa/ find | apply to the Court for the relief demanded | | in said Complaint. © , ; é J. A. Hartness, 4270 r.2> .Clerk Superior Court. _ This December 2nd, 1916, | Caldwell & Caldwell, Att'y. | | ~ 12-7-6t, ay © 3 @ :” u —j © > ® i, wD oO © - ote ° oO Q < ¥ LI6l J ° 5 @ “h. ~~ — — ° > oO : w oO rt) A ae oO o Q < ” LI6l sc Loeiiaiaiaes Notice! North Carolina, } In the Superior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1917. Beatrice G. Toner, Plaintiff ——vs.—— NOTICE, Fh Toner, Defendant. The defendant above named will take no- tiee that an action entitled as above has ; n commenced in the Superior Court of ) Iredell County. for the d ssolution of the bonds of sting between the dant, and said de- i rther take noti reqnired toa or the fi nday be- | fore the first Pion e day in March, 1917, the same being the 29th day of January, 1917, at the Court House in Iredell County,North Carolina, and answer or demur to the com- plaint in said action, or the ‘plaintiff ‘will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in said Complaint, , J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court. This December v 2nd, 1916 | Caldwell & Caldwell, Att'y. - 19-7-6¢. Statesville, N. CG. Li CCN L Ad pees J <p t IN ACCOUNT WITH \STATESVILLE SENTINE PUBLISHED ‘VERY THURSDAY MORNING § COUNTIES } #TISING RATES ARE REASONABLE. IT WILL BRING YOU RETURNS r a Pee SD ees Pz tau Say a Miciads 4” Hn. => Statesville, N. C. Ze f i Li iais COSA 427. t IN ACCOUNT WITH North Carolina, | In J [STATESVILLE SENTINE Sounty. the Superior Court, | anuary Term, 1917, PUBLISHED Beatrice G. Toner, Plaintiff 4, Konar Sietondnies NOME VERY THURSDAY MORN ING ‘i cape defendant above named will take po- ce that an action entitled as above has ‘een commenced in the Superior Court of | $ COUNTIES | Iredell C to } ounty, for the d ssolution of the; jrisinc RaTES ARE REASONABLE. IT WILL BRING YOU RETURNS ' bonds of matrimony existing between the laintiff and the defendant, and said de-| —— FEE endanit will further take notice that he is required to eg “1 r ort the fifth Monday be- | fore the first ond ay in March, 1917, the uf : tres lo Same being the 29th day of J anuary, 1917,| in ae > Aiek Starks ; at the Court House in Iredell County.North ‘ Carolina, and ans wer or demur to the com- a F< £ Jas | are in bai ion, or the ‘plaintiff will x - on / Yao Sfin 2 fete the relief demanded J. A. Hartness, it? Ae Pra .Clerk Superior Court. This December 2nd, 1916, | Caldwell & Caldwell, Atty. 12-7-6t. me, © > Q = , ~ — — ° 3 oO :* = Ww oO > = nF ° oO Co) G2 2 ¥ Li6l lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ; Statesville, N. CG. a 4~ / sili CCAMNRY Alby, Notice! Lf IN ACCOUNT WITH North Carolina i the Superior Court STATESVILLE SENTIN = Tredell County. January Term, 1917. PUBLISHED Beatrice G. Toner, Plaintiff ——vs,——. TICE. | » P: ds, Sonar, Vedéndeit. NOneE | WVERY THURSDAY MORN NG The defendant above named will take no- tice that an ac tled as above has § COUNTIES ITISING RATES ARE REASONABLE. IT WILL BRING You RETURNS ‘a 24 Ore OStahias seat r 8 ; he con ox oe 7 Ds i. ye J. A. Hartness, 42 4 Or a> ‘ .Clerk Superior Court. This December 2nd, 1916, | Caldwell & Caldwell, Att’y. + 12-7-6t, vt — o © > Q = , — u — — rt © ~ QoQ :* — A oO $2) - ae oO oO Cy GQ) < Vv Li6l Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Statesville, N. C. Fa 4~ / MZ (Oe CORY Li : a oo . . Notice! IN ACCOUNT WITH North Carolina, | I ; \STATESVILLE SENTINE Bestrics Gta Thee 1917. PUBLISHED eatrice G. Toner, Plainti acorn t NOneE.| VERY THURSDAY MORNING P. L, Toner, Defendant, The defendant above named will take no- tice that an action entitled as above has , been commenced in the Superior Court of | + COUNTIES | Iredell County, for the dissolution of the ; bonds of matrim ony existing between the ‘ enn 3 plaintiit and the defendant, and said de- SSE Stel ers ee =| fendarit will further take notice that he is | Tequired to appear ort the fifth Monday be- | > : | fore the first onday in March, 1917, the ee ltr1 es Same being the 29th day of January, 1917,| nw J72 Orie - Stas / O32 at the Court House in Iredell County.North Carolina, and in, om , . , answer or demur to the com- : . TT ?< vA \ fawn Plaint in said action, or the plaintiff will xX J ore a/ Ds rile dice | apply to the Cour / TISING RATES ARE REASONABLE. IT WILL BRING YOU RETURNS t for the relief demanded | in said Complaint : J. A. Hartness, Clerk Superior Court. This December 2nd, 1916, | Caldwell & Caldwell, Att'y. ~ 12-7-6t. pues] A oO > oO = , — ~ — — a © ~~ a “ = A oO & -_ tos QO oO Co G2 e v Li6l si ACCOUNT WITH ATESVILLE s PUBLISHED ENTINEL —J ° 3 oO - fe ‘ sl © 3 @ o" w @ 9 > me ° @ © < ¥ LIi6l 4 e-% ead oo et ¢ +" aN: ~ The Printer, Statesville, N. C. eee oro=-" a So ll —_—_—__zXT NORTH GAROLINA, Oe Iredell... COUNTY. Commission to Take Deposition.—Printed and for sale by Brady, In the Superior Court. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To WA. Mabry, Esqa,... on. GREETING: We, reposing special trust and confidence in your integrity, do authorize and empower you to cause @.D. Price and Karl Price....to appear before you at such time and place as you may appoint, and them to examine touching all such matters and things as... they shall know of concerning a certain matter of controversy in our Superior Court for the County of Iredell pending, wherein... Beatrice. .G..Toner plaintiff and... P.L.-Toner is defendant. And the deposition in writing, by you so taken, the same to transmit, sealed with your seal, to our Superior Court, to be held for said County, on the... 25th day of Wa neh =~ 190? Witness J .Ase Hartness , Clerk of said Court, at office Statesville Iredell County... Rabrumr yi. 22nd 19h? , ‘ U Hint ( Clerk Superior Court. J ° & o Med a —j S @ s* Sz o = mi. ° @ o < v Li6l Toner, Beatrice G. vs. Toner, P. L. 1917 WM. A- MABRY ATTORNEY-ATLAW 526-532 FIRST NATIONAL BAN SHREVEPORT. LA. K BLDG. Ata ~ TY < saute Y eieii>- 4 ° 3 Q eo 3 , 4 ° Ss @ a w @ © oo i. ° @ oO < y Li6l "Tq ‘“Iouol ‘SA “D) ddLIJeag “IoUO] Li6l ‘North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County July Term, I9I7. Beatrice G. Toner vs COMPLAINS P.« P. Le Toner The plaintiff complains and says: --First-- That she and the defendant married on the 25th day of March I9I4, in Statesville,N.C. and lived together as man and wife until December I9I5. That one child was born to this marriage. ~--Second-~ That without any cause for so doing, in December I9I5, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff and her child, and has not lived with her since said date. --Third-- That since the separation and abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant, the defendant has committed acts of fornication and adultery with different women, especially with one ,»in Shreveport, La. ~-Fourbh-- Phat plaintiff has been and is now a resident of this State for more than two years next preceeding the filing of this Complaint Wherefore the plaintiff? prays: That the bonds of matrimony existing between herself and the defendant be dissolved; that she have the custody of the child now in her possession, and for such other and further relief as may be just and right. Bbdvence - COC bce 0 Counsel for Plaintiff. ome ° 5 & o* i. ee 4 ° 3 @ s* wD @ © oF a. ° o © < ¥ LI6! Beatrice G. Toner, being duly sworn, deposes and says that the facts set forth in the above Complaint are true to the best of her knowledge and belief; that said Complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and her husband; and not for the mere pur- pose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerety an@ truth, for the causes mentioned in the Complaint; that the facts set forth in her complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to her kmowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of her Complaint, and that she has been a resident of the State for more than two years next preceeding the filing of said Complaint Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 22 day of WAC IIIT. dF Cat North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1917 Beatrice G. Toner,Plaintiff -—VS-=— P.L. Toner, Defendant. Bhe defendant above named will take notice that an action entitled as above has been commenced in the Superior Court of Iredejl County, for the dissokution of the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, and said defendant will further take notice that he is required to appear on the fifth Monday before the first Monday in March, 1917, the same being the 28th day of January,1917, at the Court House in Iredell County,North Carolina, and answer or demur to the Complaint in said action, or the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in said Complaint. i ADE a Di i ig : $6 ( . , 2) 1 ere. This December 2nd,1916. ' “Td ‘IouoLl "SA “D) soLlyeog “JouO |, Li6l “TT ‘qd ‘1s0]L ‘SA “D) doLIyeog “I9U0 | Li6l North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1917. Beatrice G. Toner, Plaintiff? aT Gon P.L. Toner,Defendant. It appearing from the affidavit of Mrs. Beatrice G.Toner, the plaintiff in this action,that P.L. Toner ,the defendmt, is not to be found in Iredell County, nor in the State of North Carolina, and it further appearing that a cause of action exists in her favor against the defendant for the dissolution of the bonds of matrimony; It is,therefore, ordered that notice of this action be publish- ed once a week for six weeks in the Statesville Sentinel, a news- paper published in Iredell County, setting forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same, together with a brief recital ‘of the subject matter of the same requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to be held on the fifth Monday Before the first Monday in March,1917, the same being the 28th day of January,1917 and answer or demur to the Complaint, a copy of which will be filed in the office of the Clerk of the Court, or the relief demanded therein will be granted. ~ ns : Qev AAR er LAL Loe a i a This December 2nd,1916. LU AS — North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredej]1 County Beatrice G. Toner, Plaintiff P.L. Toner ,Defendant. j -vs- j DEPOSITIONS. i j Pursuant to the annexed Commission to me directed ,I, W.A. Mabry, under the authority thereof on the Brn day of March,1917, in the City of Shreveport ,and State of Louisana, neither the plaintiff nor the defendant being present ,proceeded to take the deposition of B.D. Price and Earl Price, of Shreveport,la., who being first duly sworn to speak the truth between the plaintiff and the defendant deposes and says: Le Q. What is your name, age, and place of residence? Answers=~ T.D. Price, are, 32 yrs. Shreveport, pa Sasa as Harl Price, are, 37 yrs. Shreveport, 2. @- Do you know P.L. Toner? Answer:=- ace : T. D. Price answers ves. Rerl Price answers ves. 3. Please state when, and where you have seen him and please state how long he has been in Shreveport? \nswer - Karl Price answers that he saw him enter a necro assicne- tion house on Heb. 8, LOL y in Shrevevort, he Ser 7T.D.Price answers that he saw him on two oceasions, partic- lerly on Dec. 18, 1916 and Feb. 8, 1917. First date was at negpo whore house, and on second date et necro assienation house, both Olaces in hrevevort, hay 4. Q. Will you please state all you may know of the conduct of 2.L. Toner- with reference to his associations with women, the char-= acter of the women-- where you saw him and how frequently-- giving names of women if you are able to do so? Answers “| ‘qd ‘IouoL ‘SA “2 soLeog ‘Jou0 | Li6l J © 3 @ o° ~ m —_ ° 5 @ o w @ © > me ° @ o < ¥ Li6l . Sa rice answers thet on Dec. 18, Monday night, 1916, that that he saw Pe Le Toner leave Sennrer's Pool Room, on Milam treet, Shreveport, La, at about 10.20 P.M. and that he followed him to what is known as the Rea light District, Sporting District, of Shrevevort, La. Theat he, Toner, went into = negro whore house et a Diace in the 800 block of Fannin street; that he wert totes 46 saw one of the inmates let him.into.the house, after which he disapreared in the building and he, Price, could not see him any more. Witness further says that he watched the house until 12.00, midnight, when he sew him come ovt of the house and leave the place. Witness further says thet he looked in the verior of the house and im at no time was Toner in there after he first went in. Witness further says; thet on or about the 8th, day of February, 1917, he saw Toner 20 into a negro assignation house et 714 Caddo Street, Shreveport, La. Thet the House was run by a negro women Emma Berenson, for white vatrons; that it was about 8.10 in the evening and that he was accompanied by a woman known to witness ac a Mrs. Herrin, who has the revutation of being 2 lewd womane witness savs both parties stayed in the said house for about an hour and that they came out of the vilece together and went back up town. He further says that he saw Toner and Mrs. Herrin uptown on several occasions on the afternoon of this date and that they were together. Perl Price enswers, that he is 4 prother to T. D. Price; that they were torether on or about the evenings of the 8th dey of Reb, 1917 at about 8.10 pm. when the said Toner went to the assignation house of Smma Berenson, situated at 714 Gaddo Street, hreveport, ae Met he sew the said Toner and the Mrs. Herrin enter the seid house torether and thet they etaved at the said nlace for about an hour. Ttness says that all doors were shut, blinds were drawn, and that he could not see anything that did oceur in the house. d4¢tness further says that he knows the revutetion of the said Mrs, Herrin, for chastity, end that it is bed, and that she has the revutation of beins an unchaste womane 5. @. what is the character and reputation of the associates. of said Toner, both male and female? T, De Prive answers that the only persons whom he ever saw Toner with were his employers, and the ebove named women. Rarl Price seys that he knows nothing about Toner's associates except the women above mentioned. ~ CLAN Dig. Sworn to and ae t Bas day of Maréh, 1917. i abr “it 4 cv/ Le “Tq ‘IouoL ‘SA “D) soLIJeag ‘IoU0 | Li6l J o > a * ~ a ~ o SS @ o w o © - re ° @ oo < ¥ LIi6l Beatrice Toner {I) Did the plaintify and the defendant marry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: (2) Did the defendant abandon, separate from the plaintif®f, and comait fornication and adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: ? (3) Has the péfintiff been a resident of the State for two years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer; Toner, Beatrice G. vs. Toner, P. L. 1917 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County July Term, I9I7 Beatrice Toner vs. This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, EeBeCline, Judge, and a jury, upon the record and issues submitted and the jury having found the issues- (I) Did plaintiff and defendant marry as alleged in the Complaint? Yes. (2) Did the defendant abandon, separate from the plaintiff and commit fornication and adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Yes. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved; that the custody of the child be granted to the plaintiff, and for the costs of the action. ‘ Judge Presiding. "7 ‘qd ‘Iou0] "SA “D) ddLIjeag “I9u0 | Li6l Toner, Beatrice G. vs. Toner, P. L. 1917 yqeqeztTy ‘fuewynory, “SA SuemyNol], esqy ot Ooo Ye | ie lily ele FD pom: cv Mebcia i gae- a : | Prin, fever S474 dima yo a SH Judy 7 Wey r Si forger i eae oe ‘) gis Lee... ite ‘=.bae. MCarnplarel’ oe tuciulA few tno por Paaes try fd hae CS, oe Phi? Gar Bef JE BEN Ez cee a hed (I4*Mo-evoe.- >) eile ed ae ie LPS ee ws Se ee te LE ; a 4 a. ea Dn tte ef | Laer PAY Paras Kn 2 tp helps “Tins oe on Ag fv Ove cr Cco Yeord — oe ar Cre Eu tees Zen atg SOE PRUE CE A SO LAE Affe ha LP Fas. cg of, Leeane fusciufh Rad Lf CrefhercD pba d aor a 4. Cosa ~ fo Oe. ACen —~ ~L2e2~ ov fren en Ae. ee: ZAOY eee I Lt bf Ce t2¢ Ce 4 Ceoec Peet a LZete LIKE AtcecT Phig> fea pow fe \ fit. didn LMS Cevrr2 ZX. SS coe (ce pee OF @Mhéce Ceg Lee ZewW20 Ge, a AD fler tee lake (1-04 re es Oona Cud ur Vth aeca Cale. ee ~ 4, oo eet tass af oak has AA OCe AG 7 pine. - C7200 L5 Mis eng (te .. Gee Ls Ae afer Ace Bice GY « | Pe et ota Ar Zewpr fet Mecclinzs Lf Gre: <20e An decers<o Ef) teen SOO Mees re <2 cectatn cbicty nee Agy hin fen Cewtecee~ fro hie te7tl fa LA on Ae tf | Pree ig eet G ker Cre Curfier~ OF fotcla, Pa tard tee Betteed oe Liaw Si Chg GY Lies be Dreher? fe howe — f See Aut aoe FaAay Ch Mel WusezotG in Good pa 4 L Ag hes heritee Aad CAKE <fgree eth he cof Cd PQhe Cree Duc ffprec2nF Co Gye? Cee CLES 4 Ay Cculd hate ae ad perce, arweed cher Curstorrtlhy Zhe frer of Kes tog C4 fray fae? corehe d Cr Ouef : LYAo* Secs FU tue pe Cy te gr Hh b LAG has Crete Ace? Co leer ey a Valley i Mittin es ods ee. Ct2 ta Att~teef Aen tho hee J ang fe! Ze. OF ae ae Sa = a af i (Van tae acs AcH (P-tt> fg Gacer a ; ee ry A ee Fee. ee OO ; Pet he fe Zét224 ZO SG-AA ae Meicc? A t Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally tur fat Brox oD ) PP POF, : We Se het Voy fret tooclecer? Saas x a7 Stato tl tees. /t , a ee odd gue? Pe oe ee Ly Le ’ | Bocceteet fe, of a ' J he ots hy of Fe 4. "ie = se ty ) *“SA esqy ‘uemynow], yyeqeztTy ‘Suewynosy 3 3 ° & ct a » yzeqeztTg” ‘fu esqy ‘ueuyNol, . ae a Cf os : Z ; A CLgcbhtA iy Ss col drinnea-—= 4 [1 Le Ce 3 & a @ p= | os ty ~ - N ~ Co @ ct S q c g < @ os . > oC a @ .. COUNT Y—GREETING : Ye ow are pas Sime Be to fn a fli ti haarl.. _ : A awl. batibe. 4 pata: lirrwritdAhive ae aoe Cie pt +1t eMautlbta?. Geto: ne or ae ar before the JUDGE OF OUR SUPERIOR COURT OF LAW, at the next Court to be held for our said County, at the Court-House, in tetidrrl Ze on b Monday after the Of Monday in next; then and there to testify, and the truth to say in behalf of CLL pie 212441) in a certain matter of controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein < Nhilone Lr pebrriacr i pee c+ Plaintiff and ( Shite < A pance tide Z4 Defendant. And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by Law. Witness, ie SS ae 41246 tr Clerk of our said Court, at Office, the 6 Monday after the 4f Monday in PV 944 # 1856, and in the §/ year of our Independence. TG less tote 60h SA esqy ‘ueupNosy -3 | oO c ct a ie] = “ ty ~ W- i o Ss a ct s 3 % oO c ct a @ 3 ty hr p- N ~ Ss @ ct _ 3 ie oO & cr 5 < » ao 3 . bo x a ® Abn ae Blas fA SE o vf iSjining f4p fr PU. Ae Cc Cee oa fi TY ae y Prrvt Mice gp» ke Sy 96 Lf tart gr ALLEL or. Shan tredle ic sade (AT. (etd 2a sotnty of Sort Guroknn, TO THE SHERIFF OF Zs Line CO COUNTY—Gnreerine : You are hereby Commanded to summon: personally to be and appear before the JUDGE OF OUR SUPERIOR COURT OF LAW, at the next Court to be held for our said County, at.the Court-House “L Caled: week. on the G . Monday after the =~“ Monday i in Lhe os _ next; then and there to testify, and the truth to say in behalf of G Le ‘ep ce lH L Feet one in a certain matter of controversity before said Court depending, and then and: there to be tried, wherein CE, f oe GMA Si DAV hes (Og Ww Plaintiff and ‘ te DP Z24- WH Gd Zé Jez CHE ea 1 L/ Defendant.. And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by Law. Witness, i Ly es Lav Clerk of our said Court at Office, the & Monday after the re Monday in ch ae 185 7, and in oy the SS year of our aa . LZ oe. a ti, 3 cS ct 8 < p os « aa oC 77) > a a pp 3 ty ~ bee N & S ® ct ~ 3 7 ° cS ct a > 3 “ oI ke oan N ry o ® ct oy qi G ct 5 < » on 3 .« > oO Q ~ | Paton Tin Chad Ponte A? Hips dee a2. << 2€eh— - BS Se CPL Geax iment SOK + oO & a o 3 “ bY ~ he N @ oo a cr a 3 Bs <p os .- > Co a @ Shute of Blovth Guewling, TO THE SHERIFF FAL ae Le. COUNTY—Greenne ; You are hereby Commanded to summon Grr’) Pek a &, es Fo: codecs AOLMY hed wZ~ personallyAo be and appear before the JUDGE OF OUR SUPERIOR CO URT OF LAW, at the next Court to be held for our said County, at the Court-House in zz Lid Lyf, on the z£: Monday after the SY Monday in OChra 5 next; then and there ae é A to testify, and the truth to say in behalf of bun toon Loree ce in a certain matter of controversity before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein Ge ALF tt a7 2 Brelstt a “nD CLitate Ch a 2 Senge Se 4 “J Plaintiff and “4 Defendant. “And this you shall in no wise omit, under the e i AF Ltpis1tote Clerk of our said Court at Office, the Monday after the af Monday in « ue faa - 184 & and in the Lf year of our Independence.” 3 3 oO c ct a @ jo] “ oy hw - N > S @ ct = a 7 o & ct B < wv o 3 o. = es oC a © A Pe LM ee, SE ee Lyn 22 eZ oe... COONTY—GREETING : You aré hereby Commanded to summon St. Abd Menath, Abadlon. Lae. nre-— personally to be and appear before the JUDGE OF OUR SUPERIOR COURT OF LAW, at the next Court to be held for our said County, at the Court-House, in Met: pouttis on next; then and there Grwcell [Pra in a certain matter of controversy before said Fathi Ay Plaintiff and CL nt AA Barwon 5 Defendan€” And this you shall inno wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by Law. Witness, Lf. Fee oe, Clerk of owr said Court, at Office, the Monday after the 24 Monday in 18°G , and in the year of le Ce. / ee the VA “Monday after the at Monday in to testify, and the truth to say in behalf of Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein ¢/ ar " oO cS ct 8 < » a 3 « oo oo a @ 3 3 ° Sc ct a > 5 “ oy bes hb N > o ® ct = Troutman, Absa vs. Troutman, Elizabeth _ County. bind Ourselves, our Heirs, Executors, and Ad- ministrators, in the sum of @¢eg ae Che. pe ey, Dollars to be paid to __ (hes, pn Lee... a Heirs, Executors, Administrators or Assigns. The above Obligation to be void on Condition that Kon Niicidiie.. do prosecute a certain suit brought in the Superior Court for the county aforesaid, where the said VE he Prowl utac C7 Plaintiff , against LttzcaaGt yf \ Defendant , and in case ot failure, shall pay the said Lliactiva a —such costs and damages as may be awarded against the said Atta cn % by the Court having cognizance thereof. Wirwess our hands and seals, the /@ — day of Aft A.D.18 S % WITNESS, a of ‘iad atria “SA esqy ‘uemznol], 3 3 Ef 3 ~~ by he ber N > & ct a Troutman, Absa vs. Troutman, Elizabeth 3 3 ¢ p> = | “ ty we N @ Ss @ ct s a 3 Es <5 += = Sy a & State of North Carolina, ~ | To the Sheriff of. Js __. County—Grretinc * Nou are mee Commanded to Summon.§ ‘ican to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court of Law, at the next Court be held for our said at . the Court- oe in ig Cals rll onthe %—~ Monday after the Monday in next; thes and there to testify, and the truth to say in behalf « in a c@ain matter of Q ntroves y before gaid Ch ch ding then and there to be tried, wherein... And this you shall in no wise a under the penalty prescribed by Law. WITNESS, C7 G ve incase Clerk of our said Court, at Office, the é “— Monday after the —<7 ‘—Monday in a > Lo _¢18 5 Eand in the year of our Independence. | , Oe Ge rerrinne tte, a g E 3 Oo » © Es } s ~ oS ® ct x State of North Carolina. ~ To the Sheriff of —Z72aeavhee tt we heewely Commanded to Stimmon County—GREETING : becté personally to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior rt of Law, at the next Gourt to be held for our said county, at the Court-House i on the ao ~— Monday after the ae _4 ‘—Monday in & Ae; “Game; then and there to testify, and the truth to Sey in behalf’ of fF 7 in a‘€ertain matter of Ontroversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be ttied, where 1 Ra a /.....Plaintiff....and APL BELEN oe. NI i= sods sso ves ncbches Defendant..... And this you shall in no wise o1 it, under the penalty prescribed by Law. WITNESS, wit o. ApecececceZ Clerk of our said Court at Office, fhe e 4 Monday after the asi Monday in er —— 1896 and in the year of our Independence. bi SA esqy ‘uemynol], 3 3 3 “ ° tA he - s ~~ & ct > SA esqy ‘uempNoJ, 3 3 ¢ 5 by ~ p- N @ Ss @ ct s uxeqeZztT_ ‘ueUNor], *SA 7 z hp State of North Carolina. To the Sheriff of. bec. C2, _. County—Greretin« * Vou are hevely Commanded to Summon Pan ee "igual personally to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court of Law, at the next,’Court to be held for our said county, at the Court-House in heir alee onthe @ = Monday after the ee Monday in e KicfteF 2 next; then and there te-testifyrend-the- ‘ hcdaguae Phe everat, Miig at ated Creech drcecesl> Ci bas Z. te Mbtm Foo fori — os : in a certain matter of controversy before said Court depending, and Defendant And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by Law. Wirtnkss, Me . ~~~% ~ Clerk of our said Court, at Office, the é “— Monday after the 4 Monday in 185 @ and in the 5© year of our Independence. UyeQeZTTYZ ‘ueUyNos] “SA 3 3 eg o a @ YyeqeztTq ‘uemnozy | Ll Ay Aoofee Leet CR fens fans Ce Pace lggk oe ALA Vl ce LOK 0 0 [P02 a ePE. Loy ook Lach ~ ~ | 7 ale his. a a“. <A. Wecwes Sea > EB One ZF ee J Ge He of CA“ ake Oz, f . 02> BZ a a ee / An wee I ag te peg Or he IL ae J ee a a, | wea Se fsa la Boa a Ny If I Oo prone . ati, Oe eo es $ ‘ | Or. Leatlye NN jhe tari thi fe. gp | FeO on Z, fez O00 si ' a ; as a [Lhe fbn py Cormftornins Of hy Afr olerT ot- Le pro - we 6S ok + Atfinete 7 titre Lapotk, Qrer- | a | pede ce ee fe Mote tore bie Oley |. Ge /FF0- f aes ca eo ees sh. Hein deol Lm ae Ee J £ ome | . Phemntff Atrererelr gooterey Li he borete of Jorreliiorny heel. Key, Bete Fr 6 & oA. Jete, fe en treet 0 tl the be Pre Pre go }edonns, Ore Gaw Genet tte Tatas +4 Ore | ney haa fame Rev ettaadt & = ee Ot, P- Ph f - | ae Vewrz i a dee lh MT OF | Rea ten oo ceeds ot ae Se a ge | (eet or Retin (Za Oost Corrfleiy ~~ av lnete one ag bere or § Crete Cet. br Ltd | ieee ee Sieerics | re Cn Crenpent + Je, 409 Pod I Pose fe oe fo PAS Ree eee cs } “ie 1 + bi) 03 ih Ds Chet Lak > A ¥ te. Sie aa oe re ’ Ae he +£L- J72z £- Bex PLL 3; | | |< 872, AMMA hide 5 | | tf | Cr 4 of, ‘tts Z 5 ti : : on Se (74 an~, rec! lc ee ees Ja Saryp ee. Jafar Cetin. Mh thy fare.p | th Kah WA Od, Pare ae as pam ah a ae: ee fia oo PY AFP 2. ed ( ADy fre bop 3 t k 7 Mx. ae Fea | *ouue A F ° 4s a ° We i) ct @ " “nw a Vannoy, Kate T. vs. Vannoy, A. M. Cont OU vee — Sa f | gh ean = appa Sec ner ft hens ” ae ae S280 EOE SEA LOLI OIE aE Vannoy, Kate T. vs. Vannoy, A. M. "T pouty ‘alse O£6l "SA BUD] ‘OTe ‘ SUPERIOR COURT--SUMMONS In Accordance With Chapter 66 Public Laws 1927 IREDELL COUNTY—In the Superior Court. seule) een ae Tl ae Le AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF Alfred £ Wagie THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF” Trdeit County.—GREETING: You Are Heresy ComMANDED To SUMMons._Alfred L. Wachs the defendant__ above named, if_Q@__he be found within your County, to be and appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court, for the County of Iredell, at the Court House in Statesville, not later than THIRTY DAYS from date of service of this summons, and answer the complaint, a copy of which is hereto attached, (or which will be filed in the office of Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County within the time as set out in the attached order) and let the said defendant __ take notice that if fail to answer the said complaint within the time required by law, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due return. ¢ ‘ Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 29 Klay Meh Uy ce - ” Clerk Stiperior Court, Iredell Coustty. By é Ty UT aot StT!esS Ss + “Mt Paes * Sg SUIT Peapod T porsTy uy TYNIDOIYO + Ott Fo PIPPY 10} suOoWwUINS Lunoo wolMadAs TaAdAal OTS EM "SA BUD] ‘O[Se AY Eu "T poyyy ‘apse, OT em T-DotITY FtepySsseP Suh” Qo qy hapubuy pur YoIves otip Aspe” “prot eae 0c6l 3 bee a g2 go p ! js 3 i) kqunos TTepal Up punoy eq Fou WED We, and each of us, acknowledge ourselves bound unto the Defendant herein named in this action in the sum of two hundred dollars, to be void, however, if the within named Plaintiff— shall pay the defendant. all such costs as the Defendant. may recover of the Plaintiff — in this action. Witness our hand. and-seal__ this the — day of- _.. (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) maketh oath that he is a resident of WO HUNDRED dollars over and above all his liabilities and legal exemptions allowed by law. Sworn to and subscribed before me this Clerk Superior Court. é a a aq a. ™ O€6l ‘SA BUD ‘o[sey North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Lena COMP LAD No Alfred L. Wagle tiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges That on or about the 24th day of December, aintiff and defendant intermarried and lived together as man and wife until the defendant abandoned plaintiff on or about the 8th day of May, 1919; and that they ere now man and wife. 2nd. That on or about the Sth day of May, 1919, defendant abandoned plaintiff without any fault on the part plaintiff, and thet plaintiff and defendant since said have been living separate and apart from each other. ord. That plaintiff has been a bona fide of North VYarolina for more than five the commencement of this action. plaint Ke 1a be granted divorce from the de ndan nd that the bonds of y heretofore existing between plaintiff and defend- issolved, and that the costs of th: é ion be ene the ee and ich other and further as may be j and proper. torneys for Plaintiff agle, after being duly sworn, deposes and is the plaintiff in the above entitled action foregoing complaint and that the facts set forth re true to the be of affiant's knowledge and said complaint is not made out of levity or Lon between the plaintiff and ner husband, but in sincerity truth for the causes therein set forth, and not for the sere of being freed and separated from each other; that forth in: sa: eee have existed to affiant's nonths prior to the commencement of been a bong fide resident of the nore than -Onsecutive years next NC 5 Zry oe oe euperior Court Wagle, Lena vs. Wagle, Alfred L. 1930 : ga a = a Q . Oc6! "SA BUDT ‘apse In The Superior Court North Carolina oe Irdell County Lena Wagle Vse AFFIDAVIT Alfred L Wagle Lene Wagle,after being duly sworn,says: That in the above entitled action now pendingiin the Superior Court of Irdell County, the Sheriff of said county has returned the summons issued to him in said action,endorced," The defendant,aAlfred L Wagle,can not be found in Irdell County 6r the State of North Carolina,after due search and inquiry to locate him,";that the plainttiff has a good cause of action against said defendantifor the dissolution of the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and said defendant on the ground that he has lived separate and apart from her for five years previnus to the bringing of this action, Wherefore, plaintaff praygthaf the court will make an order that taet servise of summons be made on defendant, Alfred 1, Wagis, by publication as required by law. Jina Magl Sworn to and subscribed before me, this t) ) ay pyst,19350 é a - Z r 0¢6l "SA BUD] ‘oTsV A, Nort} srolina Z North Car In. the Superior Court Iredell County Lena Wagle vs ORDER OF PUBLICATION Alfred 4, Wagle appearing by affidavit of the plaintir ; hat Alfred L. Wagle, the defendant, cannot to locate him, be found in the State North Carolina or Iredell County, and that the plaintiff good cause of action against the defendant, being action for an absolute divorceofrom him on the grounds the defendant abandoned the plaintiff and they have living separate and apart for more than five consecu- years prior to the commencement of this actions is therefore ordered and adjudged by the court that summons be served on the defendant, Alfred L. Wagle, by publication, and to that end that notice of the action the Statesville Daily, a newspaper published ‘redell County, once a week for four WEEK successive setting forth the title to the action, the purpose of > same, and requiring the defendatn to appear at the’ ice of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County on September Soth, 1950, and answer or demur to the com- plaint filed in this action, or the plaintiff will apply for the relief demanded in said complaint, This August 29th, 1930, é & ‘a a a r O€6! ‘SA BUaT ‘oTseA North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. Lena Wagle vs NOTICE OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS BY PUBLTGAT TON Alfred L. Wagle The defendant above named, Alfred L, Wagle, will thet summons in the above entitled action was issued against the defendant on the 29th day of August, 1930, by John L, } lholland, Clerk of the Superior Court of Tredell County, State of North VYarolina, wherein the said plaintiff sues for divorce absolute, and that the bonds of matrimony be dissolved,on the grounds that plaintiff and défendant la ve te and apart for more than five eunsecutive next preceding the commencement of this action, which ns is returnable before the said Clerk of the Superior of Iredell County on the 30th day of September, 1930, then and where the defendant is required to appear and answer or demur to the complaint, or the relief demanded therein will be granted, mtn mars ‘ take notice Lo { lived separ a QO. August 29th, 1930, a lerk Of Sup Tredell County "SA BUD] ‘OTSeAY é # e a a é 0c6l North Carolina i In the Superior Court Iredell County | November Term 1930 Lena Wagle vs ISSUES Alfred L. Wagle ists Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer iy? 4f end; wa the defendant abandon the plaintiff without ahy fault on her part and live separate and apart from each other for more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action? answer 476-7 ords fin the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five consecutive years prior to the commencement of this action? Answer ee 4 “20d “AON "390 <P ‘dog “Sny 4ne eunge ill be grant- se ILHOLLAND, Court of Ircdell County. Attorneys. tudy L. M 1980, “18 nna 38 therein. Ww! paar. . b= 12—19—D. “qeT J Clerk of Superior! Lewis & Lewis, Aug. 29—Sert: “uer szIPeIp —— 3| Tl TOW as is August 29th, AdOD SIONIS NOILVOI1ddV¥ NO GaHSsiINuna salvu ONISILYSAGV HLNOW 43NO oo's SHLNOW XIS oo'ss uvaA ANO Oo S61 L \ V4 O ‘°N WFTIASALVLS Wagle, Lena vs. Wagle, Alfred L. 1930 “J Payly “1Se AA "SA BUD] ‘O[SU A \O we © 193.0 \4 STATESVILLE N. C Hye ADVERTISING RATES FURNISHED ON APPLICATION Credits | Total to THER) STATESVILLE DAILY PEGRAM A. BRYANT, PROPRIETOR += | | J Lect cna iclsetincin {* NOBER CAROLIN , >In the Superior NT. Court. — Before the Clerk. SERVICE OF SUMMONS BY Ll - h named, Alfred L. Wa- ce that summons in the was issued. } dant he 29th: day of August, 1930, | by John L, Mitholiand, Clerk of the Superior | Court ‘of Iredell. County, State of North Car- | olina, wherein the jaid plaintiff mone Fai | said Clerk of the “Sup . | County on the 30th of September, \ | when and wheresths, def ‘endant. is requi \appear and answer e¢ demur to the complaint, ' (a the relief demanded therein. will be grant- | This August 29th, 1930. JOHN L. MILHOLLAND, Clerk of Superior) Court of Iredell County. Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys. Aug. 29—Sept. 5—~12—19—D. ' t ' ' | PUBLISHE 9 |10 |11}12 }13 | 14/15 | 16) 17 | | 3 | | | z | 6|7 |8 | Subscription Brice $6.00 ONE YEAR 3.00 $siX MONTHS 50 ONE MONTH 08 SINGLE COPY Month |1 |2 |3 |4 “ lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally 193.0 \4 i \ R/V O A ke es 5 DM he & < e MN <== © 08, Oe z5 of mo < ra Oo Ww oO 3 ADVERTISING RATES FURNISHED ON APPLICATION To THER) STATESVILLE DAILY ™ PEGRAM A. BRYANT, PROPRIETOR ecole a a ee | NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior | IREDELL COUNTY. Court. Before the Clerk. TION! § named, Alfred L. Wa- ce. that summons in the defendant oF | by John L. Mitholland, Clerk of the Superior Court of Ircdell nty, State of North Car- } olina, wherein the id plaintiff sues formdi- i| Yoree’ absolute, and that the bonds of ‘| mony be: dissolved, the grounds that plain- ; tiff and defendant Have lived separate at | apart for more ‘tl five consecutive — | next: preceding’ the neement of this ac- | tion, which summo! Gs returnable before the said Clerk of the ‘Superior Court of Ire 11 |, County on the 30th flay of September, 1930, || when and wheresths.d fondant. is required to appear and answer o¢ demur to the complaint, or the relief demanded therein will be grant- This August 29th, 1930. JOHN L. MILHOLLAND, | Clerk of Superior; Court of Iredell County. Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys. Aug. 29—Sept. 5—12—19—D. { Vastion was issued against the || n the 29th day of August, 1930, | 1 | ' ‘ | ] alti 12 16/17 PUBLISHED ry 1} 12 13 | 14) 15 oe | T | | | Subscription Brice $6.00 ONE YEAR 3.00 siX MONTHS 50 OS ONE MONTH SINGLE COPY Month |{1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally 6 oO o 2 q z WF o ° e<Zzqg > ee ge 2 .< 8 i z 1 e 5 | — J —— r ST 4 i LINA, In the Superior | $-——}- 4 . IREDELL COUNTY. Court. Qa a seagate Before the Clerk. | Q Letid: Wagie ? ‘ 3 les: | = Acca war SERVICE OF SUMMONS BY me] i “dete say ean AM moweil ||.) 4 The def : ¢ a r = < nc that summons in the, | iy 4 he) defendant on the 29th day of August, 1930, | | by Joho L. Milholland, Clerk of the res | , | Court of Iredell County, State of North Car- | : A a 1) Vv - wi ‘. % , © | mony be dissolved, on, the grounds that plai - | ee ae a 0 . tiff and defendant Have lived separate a 6 | apart for more ‘than ‘five consecutive years ; a s xX —_ ' next. preceeding the neement of this | ml ow tion, which summons is returnable before the : a a. said Clerk of the ‘Superior Court of Iredell | Boe 9 County on the 30th fay of September, 1930, | q > a || when and where;the defendant. is required to) Q Se a. \ appear and answer o¢ demur to the complaint, - bet (3 the relief demanded therein will be grant- <— | a e om. = ed. 3 This August 29th, 1930. < } JOHN L. MILHOLLAND, 24 2s 2 | Clerk of Superior’ Court of Iredell County. | n } Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys. sd D ee { Aug. 29-—Sept. 5—12—12—D. | — et ss wie 7 1 5 ee ea a ? ge go Z a S a oo — < mw Po — > siale P i. oa ee > ei [ot = Ss q ip ix a 8 ~ eo} a po in a o * : a Ee aq pl QD f - Pele : , a S ahaa ce © = ~ fy esa a g a) | feet SL 2 a 4] ~ ~ = el Bah sees 5 Fs Pe a ee ee O poo ff ee f oan < ne Bs a ) es © eo +a ; 1» ede ee o wn - » 888 @ Iw ot ee Ped. pon eb a oe ee oo 3 2 ¢2& is > & Zz O $8 $5 4 f= Ss > ay 3 = a ul u O° 3 mize zens oa 0 @ S ‘Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally 193.0 \4 ADVERTISING RATES FURNISHED ON APPLICATION | | Credits —— Total ‘NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior ‘ourt. Before the Clerk. | = IREDELL COUNTY. Court. | | Lert: Wagle 1 | 4 \ NAV > Alfred “Wagle: by Joho L. ; Court of Ir ,| NOTICE OF | phe defendant’ mbeve named, Alfred L. Wa- gle, wil! we jotice that summons in the, | above | enti Yattion was issued against the ‘defendant on the 29th day of August, 1930, SERVICE OF SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION! Milholland, Clerk of the Superior edell County, State of North Car- ‘ ' | | olina, wherein the id plaintiff sucs forndi- | | voree absolute, and that the bonds of matri- | mony be dissolved, onthe grounds that plai i$ tiff and defendant Have lived separate & apart for more ‘than five consecutive years: next preceeding the commencement of this a@c- ; tion, which summons 4s returnable before the | {Ww said Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell | County on the 30th day of September, 1930, | hen and where.:ths defendant is required to appear and answer or the relief deman oe demur to the complaint, ° aed therein will be grant- This August 29th, 1930. 3 JOHN L. MILHOLLAND, Clerk of Superior Court of Ircdell County. | Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys. ‘ nl Aug. 29—Sent. 5—12—19—D. | —_}— — eas STATESVILLE N. C. 4 | 16 an} | | | | T | } | | PUBLISHED a! | 15 | | | L | ‘SA BUD] ‘OTDVAA "J poyly ‘arsem PEGRAM A. BRYANT, PROPRIETOR BH) STATESVILLE DAILY »* 10 |11 [12 [13 |14 Oc6l | | | 8 |9 | | | T To TH Lh 4 El | a | io — 1 | | | JA, rk \ | 5 |6|7 Pe r | [| i — |_| |_| aa | — 1 | +—t bd tant | |__| | | | } oe : 6:90 6 cco. » © 9 8 8 Tew i= x 2 on Bt ete oh ed e oa on : pet ae = a z a Sex FES - + _}—}—-*} —}— - < Zz S$ VY ‘eed — a Oo u = — oo = —>S Bot eg 2-4 Go = | w 9 e 4 o : 4 & 2x 2 z2q8 | al sl §| Bl Bl S| Bl BB Se] bl 8 o i} 2 08 60 6 Hs | S$] &| a] a] a] 5] 8] <] @] oO] 4) 4 Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally STATESVILLE N. C. CL@ s ; . ’ : os : i See Sy en OE Ree, he hie ; : o* Oia. cil Subscription rice , STA! SVilLLE DAILY PR: | apverrisine © leteait YEAR $6.00 oa ; ss v a —= RATES Six MONTHS 3.00 PEGRAM A. BRYANT, PROPRIETOR = FURNISHED ONE MONTH 50 a == ON APPLICATION - i SINGLE COPY 08 PU ’ Month 2/13 |4/|5 |6 Total Credits _ Jan. "SA BUd’T ‘OTBEA\ = 2 ge a > Ep Qa Qa r Oc6l North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term, 1904. Nancy L. Watts ws Complaint. John Watts The plaintiff above named comjlains of the defendant and alleges: First. That on or about the 22 day of pecember 1901 in the County of Iredell and State of North carolina, plaintiff and de- fendant intermarried, and ever since said time have been and now are husband and wife, Second. That plaintiff is, and has been, a pona fide resident of the state of North Carolina for a period of more than five years next preceding the commencement of this action. Third. Darawol. (4 That on or about Pebruary B, 1902, the defendant wilfully SF and without cause deserted and abandoned the plaintiff, failing and neglecting from and after said time to provice anything towards the support of plaintiff leaving her alone ai.d unaided by him to earn her bread. That plaintiff has always been a true and duti- ful wife to the defendant, and that the géfendant wilfully, and without cause deserted and abenfoned her as aforesaid, and ever sine said time has, and still continues so to wilfully and without cause desert. and abandon plaintiff and to live separate and apart from hey, without any sufficient cause, and against her will and without her consent. Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment, that the bonds of matrimony existing between herself and the defendant be dissolved and for the costs of action and such other and further relief as may be just and proper. Se i Ce ’ Gyye \S-Frt(n PlainWitfs Attorwey. ° Mrs. Nancy L. Watts, plaintiff above named, after being duy sworn deposes and says; that the foregoing Complaint is true except those natters therein stated on information and belief and as to those she believes it to be true; and that said Complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and her husband, nor for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the Complaint. That the facts set forth in the Complaint as grounds for divorce, have existed to her knowledge for more than six months prior to the ocnenskonent of this action or the filing of this Complaint; and that ¢omplainant has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years next preceding the commencement of this action for divorcee. bus Winey MOTH i ae ge = oe Sworn to and subscribed before me a . this the nt day of “f-* CAV Als, f North Carolina : In the Superior Court Tredell County. To May Term 1904. Nancy L.Watts vs Notice John Watts. The defendant above named will take notice that an action entitled as above has been commenced in the Supertor Court of Iredell eounty , wherein the plaintiff demands judgment , that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved ; and said a@éfendant will further take notice that he is required to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of said county to be held on the llth Monday after the first Monday in March 1904 ,same being the 23 day of May 1904 ,at the court-house of said county in Statesville N.C., and answer or demur to the complaint in said action , or the plain- tiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in said complaint. Harry P.Grier a MULL Attyfor plaintiff. Cle ee | the Superior Court of. Iredell County. North Carolina In the Superior Caurt Iredell County May Term, 1904. Nancy L. Watts vs AFFIDAVIT John Watts Harry P. Grier, attorney for the plaintiff in the above entitled action, after being duly sworn deposes and Says: That in the above entitled action now pending in the County, the sheriff of said Coimmty has returned the summons issued to him in said action " After diligence search and inquiry the defendant ,John Watts, is not to be found in Iredell County, said to have left the state of North Carolina," That affiant is informed and believes that the defendant, John Watts cannot after due diligence be found within the state and that said defendant had departed the state and is not a resident of the Orne state and has not heen a resident of this for more than ewe years” past; that said defendant is a proper party to the above entitled action, snid action being brought by plaintiff against the defend- ant for the purpose of obtaining an absolute divorce from said defendant who is the husband of the plaintiff. Wherefore the said plaintiff prays that an order be made by the Court that, service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina. Dated this 2 North Carolina In the Superior Court/ Tredel). County Nancy lL. Watts vs Order of Publication. Tohn Watts. It appearing from the affidavit of wancy L. Watts in this action, that John Watts the defendant therein, is not to be found jn Iredell County, and can not after due diligence be found in the State, and it furtner appearing that this action is for ahsolute. divorce. It is therefore ordered, that notic of this action be published once a week for six weeks in -~-"" Ar eave ». ? a newateper published in Tredell County, setting forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same, together with a brief re- cital of the subject matter of the same, and requiring the defend- ant to appear at the next, term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to be held on ; o. Ae ar. Pagal oo. oes pe LUE Oe 49k at the court house in said county, and answer or derfur to the com plaint of the plaintiff, or the relief therein demanded will be granted. Zz AM hAn = Zz Y- Eo he fide So ae } | | | | } fk of Hah Cor obtain | nck Aa the Lew . n0. GT F 2~ AH Gee ae Te. | ee ny a Coie kee se bt hla get! i Ke Corfetoit 7 as be | wh. Leis ca al tae ccnp E anne ste eaaieiatiaietne tien tgepiaeeinanie tents at - Jlevtk, ba. ah Defoe an Carn T He Lee bu hu grher rv 19 0 i ee 5 os Crrrsttent Se OK 2. on ot oh | CE ek a rr fn he : Ws ant we Boe” eee Se | wy : Af an oe Bite A a ; coc allr. gy ~ KH ae ~_ C7 L cA“ eee ~~ Watts, Nancy L. vs. Ferme. Bak Ge. der a flan tf A eee oe © fa, - Ker Ash “Lew 4 coe | © FTITOW “7Sem A *y SeTIM ‘480m West, Wiley A. vs. West, Mollie West, Wiley A. vs. West, Mollie West, Wiley A. vs. West, Mollie asseyy “Oy SA "H Are “ony, 6061 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 4-21-'07-1M. Iredel} County.-~In the Superior Court. Plaintiff, AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Defendant, State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of 4. the same being the..1.74.0... , and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant AN@fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. — UC Mahuture<s Clerk of Superior Court NIRA IES ET ATONE SE IR SE MSE TO rr" Vid - ory paateoay wr v x “TS Trad not i? t Bij 0} PTqQvUINIOy ro juepuszEep “JO JANOD Jotiadng aqj jo FoR. Hy Fowes 2 sofa BLOF asd y {2 5 t LSNIVOV {T(SpszT Ut L* "86-9 E OF > 135 2I1148 YOd SNOWAAS Pee Al Lys *AdUIOP}Y S YUE g ‘AqUNOD” FFAG sae SI} 9UL aIOJaq paqriosqns pue 0} UIOMG ‘stoRnsexe mor ydutexa Ayrodoid pue santpiqer ‘s}qap sty aAoqe pue 1900 *GOT}JOB SI} Ut JUSPHsjeq Oo} SB ysoo qous [je yAepdsjaqd 93} Kked Whee eae RT Re Ne ee Te YHHUawiq 94} ft ‘JaAsMOY / ‘PIOA eq 0} ‘s1el[oq ee eT er eee en ee ts Ss Arr JQ UNS ay} Ut ‘nor}OR SI} UL yuepusjed 9} / foun punog saajasino a8payMouyoe OM, ‘Ayunog *}ANOZ s011edng 9y} Uy “¥NITONVYO HLYON AO AL¥LS assay ‘ouy SA “H Aer ‘ony, 6061 arsseyy “uy "SA “] Ave “ou 6061 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 4-21-'o7-IM, County.--9n the Superior Court. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Magrtie White, Defendant, State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of County -GREETING: Wou are hereby Commanded to Summon ... Ma crie.White out Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of... Le at the Court House in Staétesviiie.....omthe Lit Monday after the the same being the... thd é May 2_, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for.said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if $Qw......... they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this..2t.h..... d "OF B[QeUINIAy 431178 YOd SNOWWAS ior Traay Papo tT “7 T[Spsayz Jo uM0g ioriadng 34} jo ISNIVOV *“1uepUue led Ad010}7 Y SUE ‘Ajunog- SIq} BM a1OJaq poqtiosqns pue 0} MIOMS "suoljnoaxe wo ydutaxa Ayiadoid pure saijtyiqery ‘s}qap sty aAoqe pure 13A0 “HOT}Oe SI} Ut JUepnajaq a4) se 3s09 qons |e yaepusjoq ayy Aed [peys oe Pe rer enone emnat nen aieto itis PyUrelg 9y} jt ‘ASMOY ‘pIoA eq 0} Cr ee vy ot SO TERS SUD ter ‘to1}08 STQ} UT juEpusjeq oq} 0}0N punog sadjasino aspayMomye 3A, *Ayun0d ‘yINOD Jopedng oq} Uy “¥NITONYD HLYON JO AL¥LS assay ‘ouy SA “H Aer ‘ory, 6061 $ & = =. s —~ 2 to) = < ¥ a133e 6061 North Carolina¥ In the Superior Court, May Term 1909, e, Plaintiff, + tt Complaint, faarc4 > White, erendcant 1. Wicd ¢ complainine (1) That the plaintiff and the defendant intermarried in Iredell County, North Carolina on or about the 17th day of August 1902, and now are husband and wife, ever since the plaintiff in the year 1904 as husbdand went away year er saidabandonmen him was without plaintiff and was willful and without just cause on the defendant: t+} 2n@ plaintiff did not mistreat the leave hi »4 her support her as Pa NR ge divorced from or raacaover . = @ Coumgel for t OPN eave Orn sa true wit he complaint; that divorea , neve Taare ons head April 1909, ee ee ee Weta ‘SA “H Arg “ony, ase 6061 asseyy ‘ayy SA“ Ave “ony, 606I North Carolina # In the Superior Cou “ Iredell County # May Term 1909, Jay H, White, Plaintiff, it ir Affidavit for service by publication, White being duly sworn says: That in the above entitled Superior Court of Iredell County, the Sheriff of said cou , $ returned the summons issued to him in said o ection endorsed The endant Maggie White not to be found in w Iredell County, t! .@ Sheriff of Buncomb€County to whom a pluries ummons was issued in said action has returned the same endorsed, VY Ch go rn 1 h > " “endant Mageie White not to be found in BuncombeCounty; dant cannot after due diligence be found within the action exists against the defendant in favor of for divorce a vinculo matrimonil on the ground of adultery, » the said Maggie White is a proper i necessary party t that the pl Lif s informed and believes that the said defendant Wherefore, the said plaintiff vray ts a non-resident of that an order may be made by the court that service of summons be vis as spa ver publish ea VILLE Affiant Clerk Superior North Carolina # Iredell County # a Jay H. White, Plaintiff, vs. iF Order of Publication of Summons, Magsie White, Defendant. # It appearing from the affidavit of Jay H. White in this action, that Maggie White, the defendant therein, is not to be found in Iredell nor BuncombeCounties, and eannot » ¢ after dues diligence be found in the State, and it further appearing that a cause of action acains 3 said def E in favor of the plaintiff for divorce vinculo matrimonii on the ground of adultery, and that WV Re. . r + ona - 4 Maggie Wh / proper and necessary party to notice this action be pub~ lished once The Landmark, a newspaper » vublished in Iredell County, setting forth the title of the action, vurpose of the sam and requiring the dafendant to appear at Court of Iredell County held day in March 190% he same being court—house in said county, and answor or demur the releif demanded in said comoleaint This (dav of April 1909 Clerk Superior Court, Bt Sa pies GIES Se al ht A AE St pia sca pesnaie eo msde ‘uy AA SA “H Aer ‘ony, 6061 White, Jay H. vs. White, Maggie 1909 Salervile, NC Quay, 190 M pce lherlectan EE = Oo ryt WO 6 LANDMARK oc. | wvenrsine Ie: Hr : silthemncmip RATES Six MONTHS, abe Seeks TE a R. R. CLARK, Proprietor. FURNISHED THREE MONTHS, . = ON APPLICATION — PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. 7 == Ss eo ee ® H a Fe ao 4 W's wm 6061 ae VU “ = 5 > => re oe? =< s mi oo, oO ~ ¥ 6061 4 =< fe. ee > $3” Coe < 5 ” ben oo, gt vi 6061 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally NORTH CAROLINA, In Superior Iredell County, — Court. “ << 5, 5. eo ae = 5 aS fe = OQ vi 6061 ‘lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Court. Jay H. White, plaintiff, vs. Magzie White, de- ‘ t In Superior Iredell County. H CAROLINA NORT —— action for divorce. named will take notice that commenced in ot mas ms in al titled as The det an action en’ he Bapeticn said dh 38 s ‘or April 12, 1909. ne ale Hae ans the v! Attorneys fi comp. to the t. McLaughlin & Nicholson, , ‘Please Note: Document(s) White, Jay H. vs. White, Maggie 1909 Repeated Intentionally NORTH CAROLINA, t In Superior Iredell County. Court. Jay H. White, plaintiff, vs. Maggie White, de- Ni of summons in action for divorce. ‘The defendant above named will take notice that an action entitled as above has been commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell county for divorce a vinculo matrimonii ground of adultery; and the said defendant, White, will furth: take notice that she is required to appear at th term of ‘the Superior Court of said county to be t in said apply to the court for the relief d complaint, J. A. HARTNESS, Clerk Superior Court. McLaughlin & Nicholson, Attorneys for Plain- tiff. April 12, 1909. [CY FT == = a. &. o <> p< aa 3, OQ € y 6061 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Bat ee In the Superior Court, o)? White, Plaintire,# vs. White, Defendant .# P, A, Bryant Manager and Foreman of 6 Landmark, a newspaver vrinted and published in said county and § 1é svvacned non-resident notice in the abive entitled action was published snd printed in the said news— ssive weeks and more immediately > Superior ak of Iredell ns ee & ee Be a aq O « ~” 6061 th. WZ, 5 4 Mareie White nt intermarry as elleced 2, w+ % NOPCL > ¥ =, = s ms © 4 aa < w e a33e 6061 White, Jay H. vs. White, Maggie 1909 g. ¢? = © ga S. & = e io & “< a ~ as 6061 North Carolina # In the § as Vaiw uperior Court. Iredell County # May Term 1909, White, Plaintiff, # versus # Maggie White, Defendant, # This csuse coming on defore his Honor Jones, Judg ury having answe i the iss aintire the plaintiff Jay’ HF, harnah Asrsoy relation with Judgmen to be heard at this term of the court 2 and a jury, and being heard, and the ues submitted to them in favor record: — and ddjudged by t Rgie White be and matrimonii and the bonds of parties be and the from the mari- Jay H. White, Vs. . Magcie Whites. ~wW “bw Neen Poem Judgment , White, Jay H. vs. White, Maggie 1909 Bill of Costs.—Civil.—Prirted and for sale by Brady, ‘Phe Printer, Statesville, N. C. Original Summons, or other names therein. Every copy of same. Appeal from Clerk to MMR Gricigsciittiesekionsncth chs ae Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in pe Order, including Bond and and Justi Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing. Issuing Commission he Entry And Record Of... occsec-secsescasse cssseeasoes v0: Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support Docketing same D. ing ex parte Proceedings Judgment. Indexing Judgment. Filing Papers Transcript of Judgment Execution i Sheriff's Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal Transcript to Supreme Court PRD api prcksssstntericiousvusscuceesbaee [abskoouisncssels spiseiacencestibw cai Plaintiff's Witnesses. Issey “OY A\ SA “H Aee ‘ou, 6061 ae ET Aa CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS—CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) White, Jay H. vs. White, Maggie 1909 2 > Bs 5 & 8061 "SA SOSOJ] “OYA, Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—5—,.04. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Ji County--GREETING: Won are hereby Commanded to Summon. 2 ne Hurd Jo Jacl wha, i aclee, Leafy hati” 0o hee fea Beet Be wien : J verk. ersonally to appear Te Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county at Defendent Wiitness ~ SHROENA-Cil &. &. & O ~ = 5 ° & 4 mn < Y 8061 SUMIIONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 3-29-’011M County.--9n the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Bs B na < o 8061 fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff. complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this nt tetera tet eet ~~ SBeaqtyy “ 3ay ‘Ayano y 0} FIQuuINjay alta UOr SNOW MNS te JO }AN0D Jo“adng a3 jo eg. Oo > 5 = "SA SOSOY] “UY A\ 8061 $14} au a40foq paghaosqns pun 02 usomg “suoynoaxa wolf ydwaxa Ajaodosd pun sarymqny ‘s3gap sty anoqn pun 4ano s4njjop paipuny om} 4o wns ay; Yyz10Mm s1 ay sis usoms Burag S14} ‘Sjpas pun spuDy ano. ssauziy{ “uoijan sty) ur ~~ iuiniy ayp fo danovad Row “puafag ay} $n 4809 yans 11D qunpuafog ous fod yo ge Sonat Ros vag Hyung ay fi ‘4anamoy ‘pron ag 07 ‘sanyog JO UNS ay] Ut ‘uoIJOD S14] u1 yunpuafeg ay) ojun. punog sanjasano abpaymouyan ayy . “ALNNOD *44n0) s01sadns ay) uy “¥NITOUVO HLYON JO AL¥LS = > 5 & E. - <= © n o n < “ Ach Chee Cs ye Seer C7 ra (fe &. | Li ae fe Bo oa oe ‘ pai” 2 ans = £ > = +) "SA SOSOJ] ‘OUT AA 8061 sonintharvittaan | : ' i ' "oan Tao White, Moses vs. White, Anna 1908 Seo Dey 2 sii ee Aha tht oom meeye mn _eh ) ee a Sor. 3. tie. see ts WY Mes Soni fork farm hk file AG, fo mo gL ge ee pe hgh fa fia ae ae hot Veet hore fice ft eee Cope i ae ome Aan, tgp S £ = 5 "SA SASOPY “OYA, 8061 White, Moses vs. White, Anna 1908 ~ Cn Lk bff Lu Mann OB PLing | | | ees Ccrey 2 ae Mea | idee ace ee the Ce, Zeke ozeh ce ies 1 hha tl ame oe a BOP Se Big Eo eo) eee: tral ects a, che ee bee eles eric fae ee 5 $ ae oo YH ee ea ee es ia eee ; aS Keng CN ce nie inet LL av Mer ee “ Powe oa: cae peed he frlnen ty Care. ae a ae tn "SA SASOW] ‘OYA, 8061 2 : . ee White, Moses vs. White, Anna 1908 inter, oak -é $- va F Original Summons, or r in including all names therein. A RYT /.\..- Every copy of same IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Bogpd, including Justification Order for enlarging time of pleading County. Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond and and Justification Subpena, each name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. .. -.-+-+-:-++ ssrssreee+ 1.00 Against Continuance Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing WROGIGO asic scnee sesncnsessegdeecza cease oe Laaabohaubeuscennperenesusns: weehes. smwrRnen : Notice, for each name over one in same paper. h Impaneling Jury Judgment Against Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support... Docketing same. Docketing ex parte Proceedings # $8 > BS ~” < wi “ Indexing Judgment. 8061 Filing Papers CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS-CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) White, Moses vs. White, Anna 1908 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed by Crowson Bros., Printers, Statesville, N. C. Fn ttX __County.--In the Superior Court. ss. =4 4 —{ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Pails To the Sheriff_ he L. ok County---GREETING : You are Hereby Commanded to summon LP ie oe (WW bok Are “UUM ‘SA AID] ‘ony, O16! the defendant__above named, if dhe _be found within your pubee 4 to be and appear before the Judge of our ior Court, at a Court to be held for e ounty of. Ya at the Court House in ES atrkhe in the... 47 oe tony ft LE onday of the same being the. 7 Cx GOP Of. ge era 19%. 192 sc and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant__take notice if DA tail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff__ will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this- 26 \ “day of m2 “yuepuezeq oy} se 4s00 “yourelg oy} Jt ‘Tesemoy ~ Jo Wins oY} UI ‘UOI}OR SIy} UI-~~“yUBpUejEq eu} LSNIVOV “SIy} ‘sees pue spuey INO SSoUyIM oJUN pUNOg SoAjesino a8polmouyoe 9M ‘VNITIOUVD HLYON AO ALVLS “yUle[g oy} Jo Aoaoves ABUI- ~~ ZO Rep oe jo Aep--~-~~-" sty} eu e10joq poqisosqns pue 0} ul0Mg ‘yanog Jolszedng ey} uy "U01}9® SI} Ul ° < o 4 x 3 a. ~ a 3 < o es nm a. Bo o oy = = x g. oe x. ® n ~ 3 Ru. 'S "3 3 ct < © Ps ® 3 g ct rh S 3 © » ® a & es 3 = f ' ' ! ' , ' { § ! ' ' ' 1 t t ' ' ' ' ' i ' ' ‘ ' } ' © 1 ’ ~redep teh deere tans foo mtn teenie Plaintiff’s Attorney. SIB]JOp perpuny 04 Jo Wns 94} YIIOM SI oy Sf¥s UIOMS BuIeg ~~-~~~--- ~~~ > yons |[@" ~~ -yuepuezeg ey} Aed jjeys ~~-----~---->- ‘ia or Oa Maun oot re ee White, Leroy vs. White, Mary 1910 North Cabolina, * In the Superior Court - Iredell County, , January Term,1910, Leroy White vs. Mary White, $ ‘ Complaint, es 2 The plaintiff complaining of the gefendant alleges: Jf First , e That the said Leroy White and Mary White intermarried with each other on the Sth day of August,1908 and that the said marriager¥lation has existed to this time, Second, That on the Shtday of April,19 09 the said Mary White. did abandon the 8aid Leroy White and did commit adultry with Dave Clark on or about the 5th day of April,1909, Third, - 7 Aiecwiel That the said Leroy White hag not cohabited with the said Mary White A = x 5 =. s 4 @ ee °o << < - nor in any way condoned the offence, Wherefore the said Leroy White prays the court that he be franted O16! an absolute divorce from the said Mary White and for such other and further relief as he may be entitled to and that the cost of this action be taxed-by the Clerk of this court according to law. Gh ye 7, 5 Attorney for Plaintiff. Lbroy’ White efter being duly sworn deposes and says,that the facte set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief-that the said complaint is not made out of levity or collusion between the said husband and wife ~and not for the mere purpose of freeing and separating the said husband and wife, but in sincerety and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint-that the said facts have exiated to the knowledge of the affiant for at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint/and the said Leroy White has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next km kum precéfiig the filing of this complaint, Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 29h a of January,1910. White, Leroy vs. White, Mary 1910 SE Sr a eee Bae pe ee oe White, Leroy vs. White, Mary 1910