Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Divorce Records 1855-1913 Shoemaker-Smith
brit® Quack por Ba Laue. Qetdhth Coemt, ci Ce Se Lei 4 4 Pe te go? ER as YLLES ye. eee Dleaen ters BD | Fhak- ath dos Ogi a ae iG A ee re a em Afri h ait: Bice (he at te. date —, —ol_ 14242 te pegs cid Lo, ta Lee ~ one ek Sone Le Ca fran fh ak Crncbelt rey Fo ae bh l+ tot hice sta; te the ce tk Ait eaten elem oo bie i 4 |p OR fk 24d) LR fir Lu cacsy Lag CAA offi Cit Oy: age ie ee a ’ Dial Ee Ea SAS | te Ptah ae). we Cig ig a teed 14 eve UL Okuwh: that of. 1s ee pond Clee ig pv- Ohh fro A Bi fiane fait -or$ ftcrgy UDA an nh | ys 7 Be, uteyr. 224 9 he a nk capoot : Hires t,° LAE ee Le a to Me oe Ocean be | . ! cae Lelie? D3 ow Lut LY, Buty ee Ace. 2 ee re tere | ay Lie LL ag A eek OA ee et ee C24 cae x eas Of Apk LECE Cy Behe te Aha kt ke Dkii- ZX 4 Keg l sth eee ne a cae 3 Dee Cink they ace ee De Ace ee eS Arney wee Co << Bains that eh he. A Alareyy A AAi-€4 ~ Cie oS et Adge oe ef fs ae Lit ot siete Pe poh ane ie Lf rhe a ee Rice nk <b ays here k Oy the ark Ol A *7D ard ( hie eat Tbe wt F sromattioanie be a ee CttC 4c“ Lanny ts fea tev tt 2 A VIL eer 6 | ufoer Ce A tt Ct 4. Loe CF] : &, Or, ee Ch tee LX | i Oe aaa 4 af oa Kh pli AP K vow Orn hs le ean, (A Lat, Zen Sen Ceo-wincg ae i. cee Bf Dent an L (o> Conn pt tA ee a ote CG Ar 2 2 Ge oo is gaa ak - rs: po ofa) ic ce i os wi Cee 2-H geek tee EL De | 1 / i Ma as ther fo Co A242 <1 her | | 4 ey reer nen Cz ia An ee Ato pee. | by Lis eZ tf Un teprem Chie } { pac Melts Sm a LA Ce Ga tt pcececoh © | | iN sie ace Aa ee and for sale at Harrell’s Printing House, Weldon, N.C, 12,11, ‘86, 3000 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, County:--In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ‘STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, SOB ir i To the Sheriff of----- —<l<+—-tA-t- at a Court to be held for the County of___.@¢<t-2 : <M---------at the Court House in , on the. 44 Yereke 0 he He erk of the Superior Court of said County within ZS fail to answer the said complaint, within the time required by law, the Plaintiff__will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint, and the cost of this action to be taxed by the Clerk. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due return. “a Given under my hand and seal of said Court fis. 9Z A « fi; £ i fe Chirk Superior Court of__ ey G44 el eae eee y Pf pp 82 quiry: Cc Sheriff... -Oounty, a Search and en Peeturnapiewn 3 eo ee ot Pte G Term, 188____, of the Superior Court of not to be found j MEGA RO;. 8 eee TOGO 2 Po age 3 ae ke ea, ) | | = R g : Ne... as Sq} sjvos pu SspUBY INO ssouq AA ‘UO’ SI} Ul ~“PyUrepg oy} Jo aoaooos Av ~~ ynepuey a cE ia i mal A | ¥ ; Watesurlte, Zp: Mi pM @, page pee Je Gi 0’ Gandmeat Ji. ae haficr’ and Mob ( Heh UY, 7 Q A hides mae ltl pe ee ‘ét- pe aa | | SK, (7 _ Couneety, ¢. rs 4] bo Ghee Sand meat Mewupaper and od: Se die “gy @ ste nent. Va a ne bt tbeay ot" Fa 20 Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally pein IO Holesv tee, - ap . 188 O Cie 4 0, cle 0.£¢, be Ghee Siandmath ~—- aper ‘aud ob Biinling C 1 lallishonenl | To ade; Sh peuober Si peralner = lw Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ramen tin AR EO Pak %.. ... 2 CAA. 4 (2, pity * CPL. , e S LG Bo Ghee Zandmath Diews haper aud Yl es lining (/ ‘slablshonent . Teen | J ) day; Sespousabier Li peneb ney .. | 7 oA "Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally | Hale W674 (3, paeely C&L, Go ( Gihit AGT ilonueide — Dewypaper aud Jol 4 hinting C d /bshonent Ve bdy, Su prrratier 1 Fhpeusabner eT: ir Oe GA Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally | z a a a eS wth ay lism Ore © Joh: po Whag WL YS by LOPK, A, ‘Meas 3 }95 a ee ~~. as « oan “ inate A etait «2. Se , a pe wiv ~..> a A , P28 e% 34) d SS &2— < f Pargp > So> FF wr nia » ae as Seyra L ~~ > x a € ae oS A ORTH CAROLINA, : In the Superior IREDELL UVoUNTY. Court, Nettie I; Shoemaker vs. Thomas L. Shoemaker. Action for Divorce, It appearing to the satisfaction of the court that Thomas L. Shoemaker, the above named Ve defendant, is a non-resident of the State of North Carolina, the said Thomas L. Shoe- maker is hereby notified to be and appear be- fore the jadge of our Superior Court at the court to be held for the county of Iredell at the court house in Statesville, on the 11th Monday after the first Monday in March, 1888, and an- swer the complaint now on file in the oflice of the clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell coun- ty. and let the said defendant take notice if he fail ‘to answer the said complaint within the time prescribed by law the plaintiff will apply to the court for ihe relief demanded in the complaint J.B. CONNELLY, O.S CG. perS L. PARKS, D. ©. J.A, Hartness, atty. April 5, 188s, Sa ee if Pow unling CO G 7 Th theta’ Catiiabs. Sd mide 64° ORTH CAROLINA, ; In the Superior IREDELL CouNTY. Court. ; Metesurlt, Gp. C,..L Nettie I; Shoemaker wo Vales wtlle, 4. C ZL ie. c Thomas L. Shoemaker. Action for Divorce, It appearing to the satisfaction of the court that Thomas L. Shoemaker, the above named ° ‘ ° defendant, is a non-resident of the State of t i North Carolina, the said Thomas L. Shoe- maker is hereby notified to be and appear be- pn: fore the judge of our Superior Court. at the LL ne ont hf court to be held for the coanty of Iredell at the j 3 Y ~< court house in Statesville, on the 11th Monday YA 9/7 ( " 474 f Ps after the first Monday in March, 1888, and an- CH tad a 4. / Ne CHINO) ; 4, 4/74 / swer the complaint now on file in the oflice of ae f_ 4 ig the clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell coun- e ) “ \ ty. and let the said defendant take notice if he fail to answer the said complaint within the time prescribed by law the plaintiff will apply Steal for ihe relief demanded in the / ; Yo) Cf IB CONNELLY, 0. 8 Oh fo { : foe ° ( : JA Harmen, ah FARE DO. 1 gg ‘OM \Airvatid (4. P 5, 188s, ae . y c oe pee Th adv. Meee: ae “a (je de 64° ORTH enor} In the Saperior IREDELL CoUNTY. Court. Nettie I? Shoemaker Vs. Thomas L. Shoemaker. Action for Divorce, It appearing to the satisfaction of the court that Thomas L. Shoemaker, the above named defendant, is a non-resident of the State of North Carolina, the said Thomas L. Shoe- maker is hereby notified to be and appear be- fore the judge of our Superior Court at the (2 Pa court to be held for the county of Iredell at the court house in Statesville, on the 11th Monday >, é i “ 4 ” after the first Monday in March, 1888, and an- (ZY h 7 ti Neste , IID V7. 4/7 / a swer the complaint now on file in the office of a ca a @ the clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell coun- LJ ty. and let the said defendant take notice if he fail to answer the said complaint within the time prescribed by law the plaintiff will apply to the court for ihe relief demanded in the complaint / Vv) 2 J B. CONNELLY, OC. S ©., ; \/ . fe ° perS L. PARKS, D.C. (7 Jb 4 J. A. Hariness, atty. ‘add © A btiel1Vety. Bs ( r is. Pa Cot ho adv. tipewoater St der adetr b4- 20 Loar A7?. ORTH CAROLINA, 2 In the Superior IREDELL CouNTY. Court. Nettie I; Shoemaker vs. Thomas L. Shoemaker. Action for Divorce, It appearing to the satisfaction of the court that Thomas L. Shoemaker, the above named defendant, is a non-resident of the State of North Carolina, the said Thomas L. Shoe- maker is hereby notified to be and appear be- fore the judge of our Superior Court at the court house in Statesville, on the 11th Monday after the first Monday in March, 1888, &nd an- swer the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell coun- ty. and let the said defendant take notice if he fail to answer the said complaint within the time prescribed by law the plaintiff will apply to the court for ithe relief demanded in the complaint J.B. CONNELLY, OC. S C., perS L. PARKS, D. C. J.A, Hartness, atty. April 5, 188s. Sa cena SEM? AOD Yo RAY. court to be held for the county of Iredell at the ; HWatesurlle, PHC Seal pwe le. / / CL YO , (( “M11 we f D7 KC 20 Ls / vielttey G 4 isticiks. (Cigucdbes tt binenl ORTH CAROLINA, 2? In the Superior IREDELL CouUNTY, Court. Nettie I; Shoemaker vs. Thomas L. Shoemaker. Action for Divorce, It appearing to the satisfaction of the court that Thomas L. Shoemaker, the above named defendant, is a non-resident of the State of North Carolina, the said Thomas L. Shoe- maker is hereby notified to be and appear be- fore the judge of our Superior Court at the court to be held for the county of Iredell at the court house in Statesville, on the 11th Monday after the first\Monday in ‘March, 1888, and an- swer the complaint now on file in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell coun- ty. and let the said defendant take notice if he fail to answer the said complaint within the time prescribed by law the plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief demanded in the complaint J B. CONNELLY, OC. S @., perS L. PARKS, D. C. J.A, Hartness, atty. April 5 5, 1883, Neg. 0 Ee Sas sete 0. £2. , Vs 4 Ty DiC 4 TDL dif Ltt Oe. ‘anil te O Zo tie Arsoidl lw: 22 SD wuling Panis. ee 64° | Atusfecd Reb ret acrtieret- Ue” . Prac Kiel Cree rhe Ue he we a nduat Atwfirtin of) Petree eee C0 Fees /? (Ee Macleans - PY Bbolevecl Atusteet Reb verte, | fins fat tevatin Wty w hee fe a Mio I Hay © Dacbevete 7 Pdi, “Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Anus Rbrrertes Sa e le as “ee 60 Hees /4 Oraclevee 7 Prtibcotin. Piease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally | Aunefeel Rebrertei | song Rix Cat train, Rtg lee afe- mee’ Ds Haag Oaclereee oa Pen tetcetinn. ease Note: Document(s) entionally os Wturfirtin, of Velie le ee Ofint |G Vs Kites /4 I Cboleveee (Mutter. puke | fa foe Deen i De Plains Be BE ies ah nn ee o a fed ee get ae ae pa Decade CaP Magi | tote Cig bit Uhamrk* aor? | Ae | of Whe sw nN i 23 oOo ao BE a 8 = " @ 5° oO a < o 0z6l Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—5—,04. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 1 (ions COUNTY-~GREETING: Wou are hereby Commanded to Summon 9 To THE SHERIFF OF personally to appear before the Judge of pape or Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county at Defendent...... And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. Witness : 7 Okyo-d 7) Fike BE | Ee ead aTuUly “JoxeWSOYS SA 29'] ‘JOyYeUSOYS 076! nN BS ae a RR zo 5 ao < o 0z6l Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—5—,04. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, County--GREETING: To THE SHERIFF OF....... Iredell Wou are Hereby Commanded to Summon waurea Smith . in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein aoe Tole SGU I ee Plaintiff. Defendent..... And this you shall in no wise omit, tnder the penalty prescribed by law. MRR AsO ns , Clerk of our said Court, at office in Pe eh ; Pe Rot Lee. Shoemaker... fo fe O)-fRrr See — fh - rf A he DAN AAA yepo” - xa” 37 Lael ouulyy Jayeulsoys ‘SA 20] ‘JoyeUloOYS 076! Summons For Relief—ClerK—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C. IREDELL Minnie Sheemaker State of North Carolina, Gasteh surnc To the Sheriff of anedsiix County—GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to summon Superior Court for the County of , on the@@th. and answer the ¢ y of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, wi f this sumygns, and let Ltn, failgo answer to the said complaint e¢-thrat-time, the plaintiff..__will apply for the reli@t demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this i aTUUTYy “JOYEWSOYS SA 90°] “JoyYeUs0YS 0z6l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF Returnable within-__._._.-_____-_ days into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Served 2, Soiiee eee 24 197 _- : | © Raden Ulf os } - C : Plaintiff’s Attorney. Shoemaker, Lee vs. Shoemaker, Minnie 1920 aruUly] “JoxeUsOyS SA 20'] ‘IOyeUlooys 61 Nerth Garelina, In the Superier Court, Iredell Ceunty. § Lee Sheemaker 4 Ve. 4 cCOMPLAIN®. Minnie®Sheeraker 0 The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant for ceuse ef actien,alle ges and says: -~FIRST- That en er abeut the 18th, day ef Mgy,1914,in the viliage ef Steny Peint, North Carolina, the plaintiff and defendant intermarr ja and lived together as man and wife until en or abeut the 5th, day ef Jyly,1917, and that they are new man and wife, -SECG OND - That plaintiff enlisted inthe Army ef the United States Gevernment en or about the 2nd, day ef May,1917, and was called away frer heme en er about the 5th, day ef Jyly,1917, te serve in said army. -THIRD- That en er about the IGchaay ef Octeber, 1917, plaintiff sailed f fer France as a seldier of the Gever nment ef ihe United States e - L9R- Arerica, where he remained until en er about ee day ef + ? 1919, when he landed in the United States frem the sheres ef France, ~ ~Feurth- $b. That seon after belng dischrged from the “nited States Army , after the teh. day of-ttag, 1919, plainitiff learned that his wife, Minnie Speeraker, had. moved te Mt. Holly, Nerth Carelina, where she gave birth te child en er about the 24th, day ef May,1919;that IUUIy “JaxWIOYS ‘SA 99°] ‘JOYBUSOYS 0z6l plaintiff is net, the father of the said child, but that Beh Andersen er seme other persen unknewn te plaintiff is the father of said ehild Withhwhem the said Minnie Sheemaker cernitted adultry while plaintigt wes serving his country in the United States Army on the battle fields ef France, ~FIFTH- That plaintiff has net received the defendant in eoenjugal embraces since his knowledse of her cenduct and since he sailed fpr France en the date abeve set ferth, ~SIXTH- That the plaintiff has been a beni fide resident of the resident of the State of North Carelina fer more than twe years next preceeding the commencement of this actien, “SEVENTH That the facts set forth and centained herein have existed te the BAEXX knowledge ef the plaintiff fer mere than six months next preceeding the eemrencement, ef this action: WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment that he be granted an abselute divoree fram the bends of matrimeny with the derendant, a Line a Attorneys fer Plaintiff. lee Speemaker, being duly sworn, sSeys: That the facts set ferth in the feregeing complaint are true te the best ef his knewledge and belief, und that the said complaint is net ma de out of levity er eellusien between himself and the defendant,and net fer the mere purpese ef being freed and seperated from each ether, but in sincerity and truth fer the eauses mentioned in the corplaint;that the faets set ferAin said complaint as greunds fer divorce have exiated te affiants knowledge fer mere than six menths prior te the cemmencement ef this actien er the filing ef this cerplaint, and that plaintiff has been a b berri fide resident of thes State ef North Carelina fer more than twe years prier te the cemmencement of this ac tien er the filing of this eemplaint, Swern te and sybseribed before me, th, the (7H: olay PK Vtbuhr, ($6, Lee Speemaker { Vs. € Os Urs, Minnie Sy,eeraker { lst. Did the Plaintiff and defendant interrarry as alle ged in the Cemplaint? aintiff been a boni fide resident ef the State Ansver., 2nd. Has the pl ef North Carelina fer twe years next preceeding the cemmencenent ef this actin? Answer, (Y4- Sréd, Did the Gempalint? Anaver, (Y. La defendant cemmit adultry ag alleged in the N oe = s BB @ 8 a oO 5° 0 a. <€ o 61 Lee Spoemaker Vs Minnie Speenaker ISSUES Shoemaker, Lee vs. Shoemaker, Minnie 1920 Nerth Carelina, § In the Superier Ceurt, Iredell Ceunty. ¢ August Term, 1920, Lee Sheemaker t Vs, 4 JUDGMENT, Minnie Sheenaker t ' This eause qouing en te be heard ae tern ef the veeerter \ 1 Ceurt ef Iredell County befere Mis neser,” \H. P. Lane, talee proniding and the fellewing issuer having been submitted and answered by the Jury * lst, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the cerplaint? Answer Yea 2n@, Kea the plaintiff been a boni fide resident ef the Spate ef Nerth C,relina fer twe years next preceeding the comrencerant ef thie setiem? Anawer~ Yes Sr@. Did the defendant cemit adultry as alleged in the eerplaint? Anawer~Yes It. ia therefere ecensidered and ad judged that. the bends ef “ watrémeny existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the sawe are hereby disselved. It is futher erdered that the plaintiff pay the eenta ef this action te bo taxed by the Clerk eo oul] ‘Jayeulsoys SA 20] “JoYeUIsOYS 0761 wisA J Bite Mo- 5 °S Lee Sheens ke Ss - Vinnie Sheema ker Se ee ew ee we Se wwe ee oe J “ 2058 JQ DG MEN [. © -_—_——=—-— == ba = ee <i ~ - me ee ee Shoemaker, Lee vs. Shoemaker, Minnie 1920 Bill of Coste—Civil.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C, Original Summons, or " prein IN THE SUPERIOR COUR +|| Appeal from J Appeal from Zlerk to Judge Order for erflarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in njunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . Order of Arrest Subpoena, each name Against ° Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian ....... Continuance (}-. ee ae Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing Isgging Commission ingWiding Jurat and Certificate Judgment Against Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support ..... . i keting same Eo keting ex parte Proceedings Judgment - Summons Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgment eriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00} Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each.. «10 County Tax, when Jury impareled Referee’s Sheriff. . Constable. .. Magistrate , aruulyy “JoxeUsoys “SA 3071 ‘JoyeuWs0y§ 0z6l CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF GOSTS--CIVIL, (As Fixed by the Code.) Shoemaker, Lee vs. Shoemaker, Minnie 19 “+ “f “JoyeuIs0Y§ ‘SA BIPA'T “JOYPUSOYS O16! SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed by Crowson Bros,, Printers, Statesville, N. C. Ai heee _County.--In the Superior Court. ee : ae -< SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff. ett ACCEL Coanty-—GREETING: You are Hereby Commanded to summon Sl hoe. su aft . the defendant__above named, if_..____- be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County,of : on the .____ 1 L—-—Monday after the oT : sai DLAC LE the same being the__ mee: _-day of : n ee 19/2, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of tng parc Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant__take notice if fail to answer to the said complaint: within that time, the plaintiff__ will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this seen ti ni nial mere Ns — quepusjeg ey} se ysoo yyuretg oy} Jt “‘Teacmoy “SIy} ‘s[eas pue spuey Ino SSouzTM ojUN puNog seAjesino Spe, MOUyIe 9M Returnable to Spe - Jo WINS 04} UI ‘UOTJOR SIY} Ul--~~JuBpUazeq ey} | ‘WNIIONWS HLYON JO ALV.LS of the Superior Court of 70 AUD --- “Ure, ey} JO JeAove1 ABO ‘U01}0B SIG} Ul ‘guoIynoexe WoIy ydwexe Ay1odo1d pue sor}TIqel] ‘s}qop SIy eA0ge pue 10AO *yanogQ Joltedng ey} Uy TR = oS 5 3 co ° © s Q. n S oa Da oO 5 —e oa © Q o oO eh o 5 o 3 © a = te n ! ' ' ' 1 Qu © t ° Fh 1 ! ' ' ' ' i ' ! ' 1 ' ' ! ' ' ! ' i ' ' ! _ © ! ' Plaintiff’s Attorney. sIv[jop peapuny om} Jo WINS 94} YOM sI oy Shes UTOMS SUTEq yons |[[@~~~-yuepuezeq oy} Aed [yeys ‘pIoOA oq 0} ‘Sie[[Od Shoemaker, Lydia vs. Shoemaker, J. C. 1910 OD ‘f ‘Joyeursoys “SA BIpA’T ‘JayeUlo0Ys O16! ZL za 2 is a —-E Clee Cree, f - Lap hie Lbenteccater, | a8 1 = tem J 7 hes, | ee : weap KH to) Meee wee oe ieree<g fax & Bor. u.-r 2€ Ba ZZ - | Bfpitceg Z LAL Zi. kc a Mee 24. Ze A eo, Poe = fEx£ ~ KK Laz Xf Leto feet Lene OF (2 perl “persee-Ze toc Ahm ena — fete etch tee we le ) £< whe Ben / ee ~~ z P Lars ke 7 rt Shoemaker, Lydia vs. Shoemaker, J. C. 1910 * SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The ‘Pries Statesville, N. C. 3-29-’011M ya det’ : County.--In the Superior Court. o SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. «.. "SA OINJON “JOYeUIs0YS s 5 : @Q eo = 6 : : $061 the Defendant Court, at a Court be held for the County of on the........ J eon hn Monday after the fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff. complaint. a pe , a Oe ee ee Hereof fail not, anil of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this fey (CA iver? a (hun 24 le F ““paareg > PSATIIIY ‘Aqunos 0} aqQeuINIeyY ddllad UOd SNOWADS ~ JO YnOD JoLedng a1} Jo o61 ‘uaz, ‘AoUIOWY SQyUIelg ‘Ayunod ” > 5 é a oe = 6 : . ‘SA SIMON “Joyeuooys S061 ~~~ fo op ~~ $1yq aut adofag pagizosqns pun 07 uLsoms "suonnaaxa wo1f yduaxa fjsadoud pun $ar}171901) ‘s7qap siy anogn pun 4an0 SADIJOP paapuny OM] Jo wns ay? YyzL0M $2 ay shins usoms Burag ~~~ B19 ‘s7pas puv spuny Ano ssauji4y ‘uonan siy] ur yumpg ayy fo 4anova4 fivu -~puafag ay} sp 4809 yans yo ~~ qunpuafag ay) Rod joys Suyunyg OUl ft sone Oe PION 20.04 “BADNOT Te ee ete ee JO WMS ay, Ul ‘uONID S14) Ut JuDpUaseg ay} ‘GNO8 « ojun punog saajas.ino abpaymouyon an \ “ALNNOD *y4no) 4o1aadng ayzuy =< } “YNITONVD HLYON AO AL¥LS Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Prirted and for sale Ky her original process, including all Every copy of same Bond, including Justification Appeal from Justices Appeal from Clerk to Judge Order for enlarging time of pleading PETTUS TIP GOE ois sides; sace case sche bdicev-ahin sie pacisucodsnsincalacbas Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond and and Justification Order of Arrest ubpeena, each name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. .. ..........0.scc00s0000 1.00 if AContinuasce Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing Issuing Commission Motion, Butry and: BeGOnd 06. cciz viccsesscscosccess cccceskccec ccs Gockeliens Notice Notice, for each name over one in BAME PAPEF...... ....ceeceneeeeeeee Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support Docketing same Docketing ex parte Proceedings "SA SION “IOyBUls0YS ~ Judgment. ” = S : @ o = 3 : . ff. Summons Indexing Judgment. Filing Papers $061 Postage, actual Transcript of Judgment eect tron, afa Sheriff's Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal Transcript to Supreme Court County Tax, when Jury impaneled... Referee’s Allowance MUNN Uacscceccoksinsssaredues bhi Cavesossnio: ous secuatccsdye Sacsbiebicascsdei sive Plaintiff's Witnesses oa ™ i al 4 ss 4 Ul 4s ees CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS—CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) ye a T 4 190 f erm, 190.6. / Cr ae Shoemaker, Nettie vs. Shoemaker, Thomas L. 1905 i rex. "AT al: SGM TE iii Ls ti a : AEP ES, : hee Cts Mili San a veer PLeeeec2— FAT K, Tz, - oo fi Ao S40 BK, oe rules oo a theme | Arc Bar aT aay © thoes 4 zen fick O24 ez sli si FH Br asey 7H Coveney ts, | A20D Phe? Ax Cee i a \ Z | Courts \ aunt a a ee breceG,. Lo a C1d Cacrthacte leo 5 athee StS PIE. cet oy frvewe. Zi > ieee Lace + Parreas, LésacStadhe ae. 2 $~ ZOGéc SO 2. C2 pe em C4, burn BF gro this aa: Le tee x. Sha? Pde e. pheg Wer ae? hatxa, lo; Soe | PA C14 ZZ, ape ssn a if gael «Cue <<te-— “fg 2 ff ig em pe Cleese lt2az o2 Vese Ss) Le 2<fcir~ 5 Kee, shatfrc Cat AT A be. Zazew . bnigacin. Peete cect aig Rete tone bain LR 9° = CB e- f Botinry, | olor eet, htcey ae op Pue Leds hes ter cece, 2 2 atle, De esa i Geen ee heey de vas Pra a ae: 4 E72 ACM ett ao Ca lle? Gg a A cec be has Z Ac (fer oo ne hen hy BAO - bee ep a wed tt. CX Fock alee 7~ ag ij Pee ec clas iff ws: GO he f-txO¢. ace Ce ed Cee Cer +g Bear ve 7 | ee. eta) Leak: Le1 th, UunuAntararcD ae Ciiraiot reg dasntes FIA ABET MOOR: 1s : / / —— +. " clz2- te JI OF (i “a Alttte+ gg "5 ms Ly fz; 4 ir 7, =. - pre état. si ee we a Clf-<- om cet on eo) Ce 5 ee thee Dif Oe Lana OA ea ti OE lolee- AJ Qnnre_cw Cerece - LAG HA tu May Att17lae~eee ov het Gl leetazoyr yy ter pe lc- Cee 2t2 G4 af fe bee H# 2 EG acd VAG, a9 a tig thecld Coccerty PA aa Lie peek aK Ye theces, — ; ag ( Cetener ot 2eFhee Blac oe — fy t @tzwrmaccre w/ G@a2uds CeaJ ErUufecst<o S Sa day ace asta fat Aer wre Fk. diner vt Af 7 chin Delrng LAG ~ teutif (Puarck fk O6= Beer cos A 22-0 Ee ee Oe had net Feex LM Afinc9ex7 her Ree Pie t baa PRaT Jha Acfer haut Aarne, Vatie cCten ary a yee a fox le tec Late) aDP Prelate cccuty cre pe Chae <4 Ccpr To sutege oS Re en ae eg A flor 2Otag Be2ets De V ze PF aed tric £0 2G, 2p Ptrr a Are OY, i a . <LhaT A¢er Fae x reer . fe Cticreav te. Vicar tly bas he Ler SEE Oe eet ey SS 4 Se Cf Lae HHiofencheap ntl Tk A hay Woke ZA 45S arr wikeek Aay ga a —— tu forts o Ay BE BLE Cor 422 BA 2 Liu At¥ ee cha rN 7 cage © hdut Clie ite Cevn2ele ow ele eek Al ns J Je? Wat ee OP thc eek at. (eects eh Z “Crmahkenredc Be th. Www 4 Petenmy fA Vt. 4 Orsd:.iwad Fis 241 tinn FP LaF font ound Tar 7 a tyre. eee Chane ~~ ws nye (xa> polka gue pele Ceccce Campeton <sie & “ Rove fore Ue AAPL . PO Lise Loe en pe (ty RE eee ten fer Pre am ee -wH Ze; 2= zie Ff4ES~ “& £e = Ee oare A ae ES / St a hv Aca er to} FFE Perescke sexe nYy wy SAS + De - Fee. soa tie Sse tee Dads 2A SE bes ee Af Bh Pt an? <a Pe npotes Lia — Su J Way cof Cocz 19 EC eee; he a, eee hind ?t0 Obs eee as "ome le2- gah eggs Gt GA#Wo eC a a tcttth hit“. PEP IR fa, tr Be, & ee. geese Geta A ee <2 A ? C4 tg a: Ate figs ~~ free fo fee: a ee DP he eee: a bei: a os Thi. "g Aha kt ze or al War a ne Cee se 44 4 eye PAT ss fre i 0 Aer 4 ee Oy fate Calta iG aie Oc te Beveu ee tate ete a ee} pawze& Si a a eG af Tt, ae 7 24 aaa t She: perela nay wad fare A se. gg Grass: y fret i A eee fic Mer acke xh 2s WZ aCe asd) pucks gee Kae Crimea e< <P Bed a7 rans — DK coffer es foe Oe linese ete 64 Ca EL fio, ES Frecke eur Zh yor, pli leu a Mie au . ~~ taf ee Nhe ccc a hy Du bx Ceecos G Gf Cex ZA. fe Lh, CA Cece re Dame | 22 RIGS Sica we eee Ck, Mibin aide At. LDS Ci ome, pairs: VOT Mle Aaelelcces ) tof Zo ) Fix Ss 14 2 Cte ieee a 2eppaza Ceo fra FZ tA cc hegs EEE: $ceree ce . aud Lia fo NE Let OED Amae 4 “or el aed See Me, Sal deove oS Zz oY CC ¥¢ €.7 2 Oe af Ls \ State af Path Guest lina, | WE, Tue Svsscrisers, do jointly and severally s Fela fC) |) Obuaty.- bind Ourselves, our Heirs, Executors and Ad- miinistrators, in the sum of Ze (ee bez ete ama OCD Dollars, to be paid to chez ae, ak Lhvefeara. 2 Heirs, Executors, Administrators or Assigns. The above Obligation to be void on Condition that. ZaZ< Je: Se A fle fo? me) do prosecute a certain suit brought i in the Superior Court for the county aforesaid, where the said Left ee Lhe ferret “/ Plaintiff , against Sh: A Z a Lhe fore pie Defendant , and in case of failure, shall pay the said 7 VA, JZ Le ie ae: “fee force? — ‘costs and damages as may be awarded against the said 9 “Ax fe He ig thoy herd f ‘by the Court having cognizance thereof. Wirness our hands and seals, the oS Mens L, ce eet A. D. 18 . C WITNESS, : Possfor Shu, mela, o 0 C So. ies >. ‘ [/ J Hable} aA¢ a 4 — \ d A wh ~ ) %. Shuford, Joseph: vs. Shuford, Sarah E. Shuford, Joseph vs. Shuford, Sarah F. 162) _ c rt ° 4 Q udesor ‘pzojnys °4 Yeteg ‘Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally WY — c re °o e Q J Ww ss c rs °o oo < 2 now C4 ° on @ 0 > eS *4 Yel Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally nm, Sei, NO. VAtdcigpeere. Rae? ee tes eee To i Drake & Son, ec) ae ADVERTISING ‘paognys ydesor ‘paojynys “4 yeres Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally a Cre CLAP EL Et20 ‘ oi he EF p> Yo E. B, Drake & Son, — Dr, ADVERTISING Sh ee re x an 2 La : j ee Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally oO = c rm oO “3 Q | ~ — x ” wn Ss s cS S va) ba) oO ° ‘7 a a. a. a. + A a ° ie | o @ @ Ss. & s 4 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Document(s) => 3 S oS = pa ~~ = > oben = — cs S cs @® cote @® x Please Note: Shuford, Joseph vs. Shuford, Sarah F. He “GENS die “Sele udesor *paojnys Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally wn oe o > ° 3 a. qq ° a © oO > Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally | Ln a ‘Min ye _ 1 Aina iP SBS ae .— The fete g G Ch fitter Ate teen. hed Le oem 7 FE nek Conpla. sed yf ed (2 hha Se ‘y a st T Pe A fencA ae —~ fs etcecey Ze ZA. Mtarkeen Cea -<> pe gtteectlty a red fee (e-Ceczer lex 7 , eee Ke ace ZF eo techie Ce Df pout pe BOP per C22 C4 é Cia oh a a JLICG os Ves Phu fee Coe a lela cece) fice crecii Lu LA frre “ ZivD Chiert@th Betlaé<t @t14ae— ‘ 4 Lesa te } ! SUMMONS FOR RELIEF .—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. OSS Srrl Ut. County.~-~ $n the Superior Court. 6-9-'09-1M, 4g Ueulsis ‘SA “qd “YW ‘UeUIZIS cl6l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. To the Sheriff of (A Lf Wat An County~GREETING: Wou are thereby Cominanded to! ‘uypmon.. Lil Bre 7G "fags ag Cae ay- Chitra Ley q .on ‘the!.: thé'‘sathe ‘being “the day of: Cc 04> mere answer the complaint, a copy of which -willibé deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court’ for said County;'within the first three days) of:said: Term, and let said: Defendant... ,take notice if ke hey fail to answer to the»said' complaint Within, that,time,.the-plaintiff.......will apply to the Court for the relidf demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due, gas" ibe of ae: Court. PM Z iL LE County. ts LW Upp. G K e 2 : ¢ LL jel i alichiity A> “qq ‘ueulsig ‘SA ‘gq “Y ‘UBUIZIS Cl6l "93 3IQUEAN}ay 131130 H04 SNOWWNS a] 2; o = > Ss STq} OMI a10Jeq paqiiosqns pu 0} nIOMG ‘smorndexe mors Jduaxe Ay19d01d pue saryiiqer] ‘sy}qap sty aAoge pue 90A0 a S1q} ‘s[vas pue spuey Ino ssenzI MY *nOI}O8 Sq} WY HUEY 24} JO y2a0007 Avem JuEpurzeq 243 0}UN puNnog sadasino a3pe;MonyoE 3M *‘yNod Jowedng 34) Uy \ “¥NITONYD HLYON JO AL¥LS North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County October Term ,1912. ‘J “gq ‘Uewlaig ‘SA “qd “Y ‘UBUIZIS cl6l A.P. Sigman,Plaintiff. | -Vs- | Sigman,Defendant. | intiff above named complei defendant, \f action, alleges and says: --First-- or about ,the day cf Jenuary ,1891, the nd defendant end M.L.Signmen, who was the hus- band of defendint and father of plaintiff, entered into an agreement wherein and whereby it was mutually agreed thet and M.L. Sigman would purchase of one Miss J. Lou ra, of lend, adjoining the lands of others in Cleveland Township Rowan County, North and bounded on the North by lands of C.%. Combes,on y Alexander lands, on the “est by lands of Mrs. S.A. Sharne, and on the South by land: Mr SeAe Sharpe, conteining 165 acres more or less, at the price of $1,400.00, and in part pnayment thereof, it was mutually agreed by plaintiff and defendamt and M.1L. Signman that said M.1 and nileintiff Would convey to said Miss J Statesville tovnship,Iredel} so toxbe conveyed nrart payment of the aforesaid lands purchased 2on Miss J. Lou Graham, was $250.00, and for which he was to receive a pronortions] interest in the lands so purchased, > 7 Pp mn . ° ; rrne my} ? to be the property NM Sigman. That greed by in her $ 4 . " hateital, ‘ 5 was } ra) Y) ANDO Signman and fam ( vhich plainti vas then a member, and until a divi of said lands,or its procecds ,was desired --Second-- "4 “q UeUIsIg “SA ‘d ‘Vv ‘UBUIZIS That in vursuance of said agreenent the lands aforesaid ‘ i © , cl6l was on the 8th day of Jenuary,1891, purchased of the said J. Tou Grahem, and was by her, the said Jd. Ton Grahem on said date, duly deeded to the defendant, and the plaintiff and defendant and M.L. Signman deeded to said J. Lou Graham the 4 acres of lands aforesaid in part nayment of the pure hase soon thereafter entered into the possession of said the nieinti: t 1.1L. Sigman. The t said date has,under the agreement a esai -amained in t defendant, but the plaintiff under seid agreement is the owner of, and entitled : : to a £/28 undivided interest therein . plaintiff desiring to interest in said lands, or its value, in severalty, and having duly performed all of the terms and conditions of demanded of defendant that she convey him hi serest j aid lands, or pey him value, but devendant refused and st refuses contained about duy of March,191e, M.1L. Sigman in Row County, North Carolina, never having demanded of defendant a conveyence of his undivided interest in the 4a under the agreement aforeseid and leaving the defendant who is his vidow and the plain- 3? © Mrs. Fannie wi @me Ti. Ards pi eime Aes Sigman, Mary Corriher ‘ eee Thompson end Mrs. Geneva ‘] “q Ueusis "SA "d ‘Vv ‘UeUIBIS c16l Gorriher, his only heirs at law. --Third-- That the defendant, since the exceution of the deed afore- said has been, and is now, !} she title to the lands aforesaid under and by virtue of the agreement aforesaid , but M.L. Sigman, at the tive of his death was under ent aforesaid, the owner of 2a 23/28 undivided inteest ds; and that the plaintiff is the owner of 5/28 undivided interest therein, unaer she agreenent aforesaid, and as one of the heirs at law, of M.L. Sigman deceased is entitled to a l¥ undivided interest in the remainder, sub- seet to the dower rights of defendant. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment: That defendant be declared a trustee holding a 5/28 undivided interest in said lands for plaintiff under the she be required toconvey snterest therein; that she be de- ding a 23/28 undivided interest in said lands as trustee for the above namec heirs at lav of M.L. Sigmen deceased, & subject to her dower rights therein and that she be required to cc y said interest to good con- sa 4 WAAR science PIaintif(%. -4.6. 2 entitled ac n, afte ing duly vor denosesand says has read the foregoing Complaint, that the same is true of his own knowledge, except 70 mat ‘ d things steted therein upon information and belief, ant those he believes a before +t to be true. ‘qq UeUsIS ‘SA ‘qd “Y ‘UeUISIS C16! North Carolina, Superior Court. Iredell County. Octoher Term, 1912. de Pe Sigman, -vs- ANSWER « ) Mrs. E. F. Sigman. The defendant answering the plaintiff's complaint alleses and says: Pirst: That in answer to paragraph first of the complaint, she denies each and every allecation as therein allezed, except she admits that she is the mother of the plaintiff, A. P. Sigman, that HM. L. Sipman was her husband and father of-piaintifts i iisiiadideteiinissssesicsiscsinieambaina Second: That in answer to pararzraph second, she denies each and every allezation as therein allesed, except she admits that the title to said land is in her, and alleces that she is the rightful owner thereof, Third: That she denies allezations contained in paragraph three, except she admits she refused to convey any part thereof to plaintiff. And proceeding to answer allesations contained in second cause of action, alleres and says: 1. That she denies allecations contained in first paragraph except those admitted heretofore.e 2, That she admits allegations contained in para- craph two, except the inference and allecation that Me Le Sipman claimed "undivided interest in the lands aforesaid under the amreenent s*foresaid "this she denies. 3, That she denies each and every allegation in paragraph third (3). ‘J “q “UeUIsIS ‘SA ‘gd “y ‘URUIZIS C16l And proceeding further to answer said complaint the defendant alleses: 1. That she is the owner of the land mentioned in the cornlaint, that she bought and paid for the same with her OWn money and earnings together with the assistance of her husband M. 4. Sigman, and that title was made to her, without any reservation or agreement to reconvey to M. le Sieman or the plaintiff, for all or any part thereof, and that she has occupied, cultivated and managed said farm as her own farm from the time of said purchase and the makine of said deed to the present. 2. That she has been in the possession of said land continuously under known and visible lines and boundaries, noldine the sane -atversely tow at per ttww arte for more than seven years and she pleads the same in bar of any recovery in this action. 3, That she has been in the possession of said land continuously under known and visible lines and boundaries, holding the same adversely to all parties, and especially the plaintiff, for more than twenty years and she especially pleads the same in bar of any recovery in this action, 4, That more than ten years have elapsed, since the vlatntitf's cause of action arose, if any he has, and the brinsing of this action, to-wit fron January 1891 to October term of this Court in 1912, and the defendant especially pleads said lapse of time and the statute of limitation in bar of the plaintiff's cause of action or any recovery thereon. WHEREFORE, the defendant demands that she so without day and recover the cost of the action, LA Mibaghte.. lb brs Attorney for Defendant, 4°q ‘Uewsig ‘SA “qd “Y ‘URUIZIS C161 4 L. F. Sigman being duly Sworn, deposes and Says that the foreroing answer is true of her own knowWledzve, excent as to those matters and thines Stated upon information and belief, and as to those she helieves sworn to and subseribed before me oases of May, 1913. Witness my hand and official seal. it to he true, My Comm Sigman, A. P. vs. Sigman, E. F. 1912 rs North Carelina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1910. ‘dH Uowdig SA" "W ‘UoUdIg O16! M.B. Sigman, Plaintiff. COMPLAINT. -vs- H.P. Sigman, Defendant The plaintiff cemplains and says: --First-- d@efendant married in the Ceunty Nerth Carolina, on or about May,1893, as man and wife since said time; that d-lock to the parties bout twelve years old, That she and the ef Catawba, and State of and have lived together. there is one child now living born in we to this action, namely, Sallie Sigman, 4 now with this plaintiff. --Second-- aforesaid by the cruel and ff by the defendant, by his curs- @ kicking this plaintiff indignities to her beating and assault- That since thé marriage barabrous treatment of the plainti ing, abuse and vilifying, beating an that her life has been endangered and by such vilifying her, person by his cursing, abuse , r, that her condition has become ing her , threatening to kill he intolerable and life burdensome. times been a dutiful wife and mother, an dignities in silence for many years. --Third-- That the plaintiff has at all d has borne these in- e State of North two years next and that the facts ped and board, have r to the commence- That she has been & resident of th Carolina, and Iredell County, for more than proceeding the institution of this action, set forth as grounds for her divorce from been known to her for more than six months prio ment of this action. WHEREFORE, she prays judgment, that the Bonds of matrimony existing between her and the defendant be dissolved, so far as she may be entitled under the facts in this case from bed and he have the care and custody and control of the child ty both real and personal, claim , which the defendant may have had, by reason of the marriage aforesaid, and for such other and further relief, as may be just and right. q wetctl Counsel for Plaintiff . ‘dH ‘Uowsig "SA" ‘W ‘UOWsIg O16! North Carolina Iredell County M.B. Sigman, being duly sworn, deposes and seys, that the facts set forth in the above complaint are true,to the best of her knowledge and belief; that said compleint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and her said husband, and not for the mere purpose of being free and separate from each other but in sincerity and in truth, for the causes mentioned in the Complaint; that the facts set forth in said Complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to her knowledge for more than six months, prior to the filing of the complaint, and that she has been a resident of the State of North Carolina, for more than two years next proceeding the filing of said Complaint. We Mo ArgrrIre— Sworn to and subscribed before me thigothe 22nd, day of November,1910. AR itaaticmonedttc ae aneaese:y estar ie ns eiestsese ee se - Bee r North Carolina In the Superior Court. Iredell County May Term, 1904. Thomas Simonton vs Alice Simonton The plaintiff complains of the defendant, and allages: lst. That on or about the day of is9Z, in the County of {4 ZZ. and State of North Carolina, plaintiff and defendant intermarried and ever since have been and now are husband and wife. end. That plaintiff is and has been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for a period of more than five years, next preceeding the commencing of this action. ¥ ord. That on or about the end day of april, 1899, the defend- ant left him and has been gone ever since that date. fhat plain- tiff has always been a true husband to the defendant and the de- fendant willfully and without cause deserted and abandoned him and ever since said time has and still continues to s6 willfully and without cause desert and abandon plaintiff and live separate and apart from him without any sufficient cause and against his will and without his consent. 4th, That there was no issue of said marriage. Wherefore Thomas Simonton, plaintiff, demands suffment. that the bands of matrimony existing between himself and the de- fendant be dissolved and for the cost and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper. Ai: Poids Atty for plaintiff. Thomas Simonton, plaintiff, above named, after being duly sworn, deposes and says; thatthe facts set forth in his fore- going complaint, are true to the best of his knowledge ard be- lief, and the said complaint is not made out of levity or by coOlusion between himself and his wife, nor for the mere purpos of being free and separated from each other, but in sincerety and truth, for the cause, mntioned in the complaint. That the feats set forth in the complaint have existed to his knowledge for more than six months, prior to the commencement of this action, or the filing of this complaint. And that plaintiff has been a resident of tne State for more than five years prior to the commencementof tnis action for divorce. Sworn to and subscribed before me ye es p Ds this 2lst day ofMay, 1904. Lf yeteoe XS cttw POL Ife ttt Kn ff, LPCOK- Dept. Cc. S.C. Mo Cee worth Carolina () In the Supe ior Court. Iredell County ' May Term, 1904. Thomas Simonton vs Issues. Alice Simonton ist. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: ai end. Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina five years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer: iGo ord. Did the defendant, willfully, and without cause, abandon the plaintiff and live Separate and apart from him as alleged in Answer: ali the complaint? ee ae | Sed bl Canty 3 Ang 8 Jasecs fs S Mas ae | Phin Dears Corman ane to be Keri af fir firm of Pe Cant her thes Horner C hae fr. Crd bredgs arash a fora crt a fog Racing eres resels Px camevet Dnachora lab imdererinnay 20 abbiged aor He Oonplank $y, hicomel Mao he flan EY bir n, hon fusbt prarsleoct of Mh Vioks rf Serth Carnbrntt for foyer yamee met fs ering Bi Oper nimnnt gd Fein atin Sax eet Soot Hadogmal Mest etree: Fa foloin tf onnel Los papareks dort atar! he i j SE Tanne Crwardoaral arct acbfredged ty Ths Quel Hab Pe brated wrePemnn rarbng hens ~ Ba pla: DG, snot Fak Foes planted tomy Hy Carl of A acl ™ w eM” poy Vann Fa, gee bse Rt BS Sete niet ainaneruaeenam rng ioe SiR SS on gas Ee sana —— eI]oq “UowWoUTIS ‘SA TIIA\ “UoOUTIS SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. LI6I 9 7 > RQ ° D 4 ul ao ¢ e Bf i nm = OH \ State of Norttecarail ina,“ E Ph | i ou ‘a To the Sheriff of Zo -County-GREETING: I 2 #8 | Wou are Hereby Commanded to’ Suinmon......... setepneweecneecerenccecesredeeseenssncceseucsspadeecssscnseneecatanponedusesenscgsceccasectacedecsancecscnssccsebdwesonsccscionseseesecstoe: seeascecccerennnnehonataneannabercsenwesnvcasssascccecsescescssscsestdeeseneesensecesecececececede te wessedbeceeddeccneses eencede ca weseedbeonedAvcnscnrecnsseccesesedecncncccnsanasevcacacteoaseracete @ Pe (2 AOULP fps Ns Of FO poneieg g vppaee aaa asia ial (2es)) es i the defendant....above named, dt ls., -be found within your County, to be « and appear before the Judge of (2e3y"), aes, . ‘House | in te. Jot thefPiE GY Fee Motilfay aftef the... thé satheé: being hess Zo r daly OF 2 a 1p sgdlattnswer the complaint, a copy of whith’ willbe’ dépésited in the office of the Cferk of the Superior Court'?ér Said Doutty, within the first three’ days of :saidy Term, and ‘letsaid:Deferidant::...;take notice if. “they fail to answer to. the said’ complaint Within. thet time, the-plaintiff.;.;..will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint; ------------- Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due}return. . Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. 6S7Z... LY OE oo et ner a aca cap tes alaecpeccsid Ohcteqcsa aes ¥° ‘Clerk of Superior Court. jet Gla Cof...County. ; LI6I BI[9q “UOWWOUTTS ‘SA [TIM “UojOUTTS "93 sIquanyey 131734 W041 SHOWWNS ry B-. S| > | Si c. SI} 2M a10Jaq peqrosqns pue 0} UIOMS “suOT;NIexXe wWoIy }dmaxa Ay1adoid pue sart{IqeI] ‘syqep sty aAoge pue 19A0 ‘Lpuezeq 213 se 4s00 yons ]]e HATELY ay) jt WaAamoy ‘pion aq 03 ‘sre]10q nPatehemovedsnapssneeadsencntaddabastvenbnnuepabaceccccncnsconcccsnbecsgracseustecsoncepbounp } Oo wns aq) a ‘norjo8 sit} ur quepnayaq 243 0JUN puNnog seAjesino asp; MouyZoe 9M, ‘NOD J0Laedng aq} UY] \ “¥NINTOUYD HLYUON JO GL¥LS BI]aq “UOJWOUTIS "SA TIA, ‘UO WOUTIS LI6l 4 5 o ‘North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. July -Term!2912. Will Simmonton, Dalia Simman+-~— rem ? Complaint ° The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges: First. That the plaintiff and defendant were married on about: the i6th, day of March, 1897 in said County and State and since then have been and are now hisband and wife. Second. ‘ That some time in 1904 the defendant disregarding the solemni-~ | ty of the marriage vow, willfully and without cause deserted and abendoned| the plaintiff and hes sitce then and still continues to so willfully | and without cause desert and abandon the said plaintiff and to live seperate and apart from him, without sufficient cause or reason, Third. That some time in the year of 1904 after the defendant had abandoned the plaintiff as aforesaid, the said defendant defendant made her home in 6harlotte N.C. and while living in said City lived in afultry with one and other persons unknown to the plaintiff; and that some time in the said year of 1904 the said defendant was seen to board a train in company with said for parts unknown, Fourth. That the plaintiff has not received the defendant in conjugal embraces since she abandoned him as above stated. Fifth. That the pélintiff has been a bona fide resident of the State eI[aq “UojUOUTIS "SA TILA “UOJMOUTIS Liol . % ‘ for more than two years next preceeding the instituthon of this action. Sixth. That the facts herein contained and set forth as a complaint, have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months next preceeding the institution of this action. _ Wherefore. tha nie*—++#e Aame~4o JUdENent ageinet the aerendent that he be granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of Matrimony with the defendant. ; Sie y, tor the Piain Will Simmonton, being duly sworn deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowle- dge end belief and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and the defendant and not for the pur- pose of being freed and seperated from each other, but » in sincerety, and truth for the causes named in the complaint; that the facts stt forth in this complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to his knowledge at least six months préor to the filing of this complaint and that the plaintiff has been a resident of this State for more than two years next preceeding the filing of the complaint, Jri2 < i Sworn to and subscribed before me this the Z5 day of Junelg9ilz. ff fia Ch af Ce. BI[9q ‘UoUOUTTS SA [[IA\ ‘UOJUOUTIS LI6I ‘Served by publication- affidavit. North Carolina, 1 In the Superior Court Iredell County. Will Simmonton July Term, 1 1 vs, B 1 Delia Simmonton. 1 1 Will Simmonton, being duly sworn, deposes and says; that in the above entittlea action now pending in the Supertor Court of Iredell County, the sheriff if saod county has returned the summons issued to him endorsed"Beliag Simmonton is not to be found in Iredell County":- that | the defendant woh due diligence cannot be found in the S&&te; that a cause of action existe against the defendant in favor of the plaintiff as follows: The plaintiff and defendant were married on or about the 16th, day of March 1897; that some time in 1904 the defendant wilfully and without cause abandoned the plaintiffand that since the time of said abandonment the defendant has lived in adultry with and others unknown to the plaintiff, wherefore the said plaintiff prays Estep cn a AO that an order may be made by the Court that service of summons be made on the said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County, N.C. Lun ) ' Jtc- 7a. r 4 Dated this the 4, 2 Gay of June, 1912. Subscribed and sworn to before me this the ya aay of Junel9l12,. \ | ns oi ii ldbinnitalele acai ao Co ly a Je D ‘ BER Saf (ou 4 1 St tilt bi 5 Bi eIjOq UowouTS ‘SA TTLA\ ‘UoqOUTTE LI6l ORTH CAROL INA r ; ‘ : 1 toatl Vv Ty 2:39 , : VEL Le 4 4 ' wimonton ° wil onton <2 A Baik Cu - gk vUSUVLCE, the plaint ih bey ' In the Superi j i May Term, 1917 f i i ' r ee ae 7 + ! See 2 2S j i < ry S 4 9" rsd Se Or vO be keard be » £A4 < 2 s 4 gUaHKe «£16 UinNs, aha | ° oP +4 ; . = : Lif if tne ACtLON taxes Simonton, Will vs. Simonton, Delia 1917 ep] ‘UOJUOUIS ‘SA WURITIIA\ “UOJUOWTS cl6l North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Nov. ,Term. William Simonton Vs. COMPLAINT. Ida Simonton THe “zeintir’ compleins of the Yefendant and alleges: FIRST. That on or about the ----day of March,1893,at Statesville,N.C, the plaintiff and defendant were marriedand lived together as man and wife until the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in July, 9II. SECOND: That on or about ---dey of July,i9II,the defendant disregarding the solemity of the marriage vow,wilifully and without cause deserted the plaintiff and ever since has and still continues so to willfully and without cause desert and abandon the plaintiff and to live separ- ate and apart from him without any sufficient cause or reason. THIRD: That prior to the total abandonment of this plaintiff by the said defendant ,to wit:on or about the 25th-day of “eb. ,19II, the said defendant committed adultry with one Charlie Ray ,a colored man,and with other persons unknown to this defendant,and that finally the said defendant totally abandoned the plaintiff,as alleged above, leaving his home for parts unknown to this plaintiff,and for the purpose as this plaintiff is informed and believes,of joining the said Charlie ‘ey, with whom she had commited adultry,and that they are now living to- gether in the unlawful and unholly state of Hornication and adultry. FOURTH:That the plaintiff has not received the defendant in cungugal embraces since she abandoned him ,as above stated,or since his knowl- edge of her unholYy relation with other men. FIFTH: : That the plaintiff h been a boni Fide resident of the State of N.C.,for more than two years next preceeding the commencement of this action. SIXTH: That the facts herein contained and set forth as a complaint have existed to,the khowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months next prececding the commencement of this action. DAR Be es PP a= S =! = 3 < v c16l Wherefore the plaintiff demands Judgement that he be granted a divy- orce absolute from the bonds of matrimony with the defendant William Simonton being duly sworn,deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledges and belief,and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or collusion between himself and the defendant,and not for the mere purpos of being freed and separated from each other,but in sincerety and trut for the causes mentioned in the complaint. The facts set forth in said complaint as grounds for divorce,have exi ted to affiants knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this complaint and that the plaintiffhas been a boni fide resident o the State of N.C.,for more than two years prior to the filing of the a Complaint. Plaintiff* Sworn to and subscribed before me, : A 3 © SB o y a & a 3 5 5 6 ° = 3 < ¥ c16l f { . ~ & North Yarolina, $4 In the cuperior Court / Iredell County- Oct-,Term,I9II. William Simonton Vs. Affidavit of Printer as to Ida Simonton. Publication of Summons‘ R.B.Wilson ,the Editor and manager of The Statesville Sentenal,a News paper published in Statesville,N.C.,and Iredell CO, Being duly sworn deposes and says’ That the notice of Publication of Summons in the above entitled case of William “imonton “s.+aa Simonton,said notice herewith attached,appeared in the said “entena} for thirty days and for four successive wéeks,said notice begining on Oct.,5th.I9II, and appearing for thirty days and for four successive weeks thereafter , Sworn to and subscribed before me, Tis tes of 5 a 3 3 3 S 5 a ~ ” rae 5 — © 3 = ° P re p 3 ~ < wn 161 c Netige of Svmnee North nian: | Ba Suahidae aie lredell County. |. Before the Clerk, W. M. Simonton i Noties of Ser- oy Ida Simonton | Publication. The defendant above pamed, Ida Simonton, will take notice that a summons: Yn the above en- titled action’ was issued against the said defendant on the. 25th day of Sept. 1911,-by James Hae a Si: en of one : ounty, wherein plaintiff sues for’a: divoree- abso- © lute on =O nan he on: ane : grounds of adultry part of - . said defendant, a the said de. County, N. C., on the “Bighth ae Monday After the First Monday in Se tember, 1911, the same being the 30th day of October, 1911, =} which time said summons is made returnable, or judgment. will be given against her and in favor of the plaintiff, This ‘WBehday of Sept. 1911. J. A. HARTNESS: ZEB. V. LONG CoS ' - Attorney. 5 — } 5 = S P & N 3 = © = - ° r Z = 2 = — < yn 161 uc ‘ease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Notice of Summons, North Carolina, | In Superior Court, lredell County. |. Before the Clerk, W. M. Simonton | Notice of Ser- vs, a vice by. Ida Simonton | Publication. The defendant above named, Ida Simonton, will take notice that a summons’ in the above en- titled action was issued against the said defendant on the 25th day of Sept. 1911,-by James A: Hartness, C. S. C., of Iredell County, N. C., wherein the said _ plaintiff sues fora: divoree abso- lute from said defendant on the grounds of adultry on the part of - said defendant, and the said de- .- fendant is required to appear and - answer or demur to ° : com- fredell Superior éourt, which will be held at’ Statesville, Tredell County, N. C., on the Eighth Monday After the First Monday in Se tember, 1911, the same being the 30th day of October, 1911, at which time said summons is made returnable, or judgment. will be given against her and in favor of the plaintiff, - This 28thGay- of Sept: 1911. J. A. HARTNESS: ZEB. V. LONG CG. Sze Attorney. —_. > = | ~ = OC = ~ = ~ © — — oO ae © YM ae = _ — 5 o = = ° 5 ; ea = ~— $e) 3 ~ < ¥ 16l u Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Notice of Summons... North Carolina, | In Superior Court, lredell County. |. Before the Clerk. W. M. Simonton | Notice of Ser- vs, | vice by Ida Simonton | Publication. The defendant above named, Ida Simonton, will take notice that a summons jin the above en- titled action was issued against the said defendant on. the 25th day of Sept. 1911, by James A. Hartness, ©. S. C., of Iredell County, N. C., wherein the said plaintiff sues for a: divoree abso- lute from said defendant on the grounds of adultry on the part of - said defendant, and the said de- fendant is required to appear and answer or demur to the com- plaint at the October term of fredell Superior court, which will be held at Statesville, Iredell County, N. C., on the Eighth Monday After the First Monday in Se tember, 1911, the same being the 30th day of October, 1911, at which time said summons is made returnable, or judgment will be given against her and in favor of the plaintiff. - This 28thay of Sept: 1911. J. A. HARTNESS: ZEB. V. LONG CG. Sag Attorney. Ss — —_ ~ e — = o = — Qu Rs reX) NM = ~ = Oo = — = O jo ; >! <= S — _ < Y 161 ‘Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Notice of Summons. North Carolina, | In Superior Court, lredell County. | Before the Clerk, W. M. Simonton | Notice of Ser- vs. | vice by Ida Simonton | Publication. The defendant above named, Ida Simonton, will take notice that a summons in-the above en- titled action was issued against the said defendant on the 25th day of Sept. 1911, by James A. Hartness, C. §. C., of Iredell County, N. C., wherein the said plaintiff sues for a divorcee abso- lute from said defendant on the grounds of adultry on the part of said defendant, and the said de- fendant is required to appear and answer or demur to the com- plaint at the October term of Iredell Superior court, which will be held at Statesville, Iredell County, N. C., on the Eighth Monday After the First Monday in Se tember, 1911, the same being the 30th day of October, 1911, at which time said summons is made returnable, or judgment will be given against her and in favor of the plaintiff. This 28th'day of Sept. 1911. J. A. HARTNESS: ZEB. V. LONG CO. Sac: Attorney. —_ = = Oo —_ = o — a Co. on & YN = = © = = o 2 s a < = 3 = < PD 16l Cl ‘Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally _ 3 5 3 6 P — a $e) od 3 o 3 =I ° P = z 3 < ¥ T16l North “arolina, In the Superior Court’ Iredell County: Feb.,lerm- William *imonton Vs. ISSUES. Ida Simonton. FIRST: Were the Pleintiff and defendsnt inter-married as alleged in the Complaint? Answer,./“ ps SECOND: Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and commit adultry as Ce alleged in the Complaint? Answer, .(/-(t0~ THIRD: Has the plaintiff been a Boni’ Pide pesident of the State of N.C., for two years next preceedin the commencement of this action? Answer, fe A RN eer enelee : ys ” bes 777 VY wy-7 = : | | j ; oo ~ i bof - -o/ 4 Simonton, William vs. Simonton, Ida 1912 2 3 © 3 = © P a¥ =X) iA 3 ° = ac °o P 5 3 < y 716! North carolina, IN the Superior Court, Iredell County. Feb. ,Term. William Simonton Vs. JUDGMENT. Ida Simonton. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by a jury and his Honor, G.S.Ferguson,Judge presiding,and the jury having answered all the issues sibmitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, It is therefore,ordered and decreed by the court that the bonds of mat- rimony between the plaintiff,"illiam “imonton and the defendant, da Simonton be dissolved,and that William Simonton,the plaintiff,have a divorce absolute from the bomds of matrimony from the defendant,*da Simonton’ #nt to such other and further releaf as he may be entitled to- It is further ordered and adjudged that the “laintiff pay the costs of this action. This Feb. ,6th-,+9I2. Judge presiding. . eee TL RRR BENE: BIE TS AEM MN eB Macs a ae ay IIR Raa tee ti li ial i 7 . a , A oe areereemrenes q | if, Lbb f siocl ree | th dienctsce iH. | /\ \ { f j Ry A / 4 / Z# AMAL Cetera eee eee swe ae Simonton, William vs. Simonton, Ida 1912 net nereendneneaeeneemenstethseneneiennmvesonaunratientrienEirensimenemiodeenbacny cena Se ec ee ae SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ” 2 3 8 Q S n 2. o < - the Defendant above named, eis be found within your Ccunty, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court tobe held for the County of .......: J: weede tA * at the Court House in ee the same being the ate fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff. complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this :....4..¢ ‘d ‘f ‘Sullg L061 ae P Q c 2. o a ~~ peIATag “Ayano; —9[ od tala U0d SNOW jo nod s0redng ax} jo ‘ADUIOWY syUurerg ~ fo inp ~~ 149 au auofag pagidasqns puv 07 usoms "suoynaaxa wos jduaxa fijuadoad pun sarjipiqny ‘sqqap siy anogn pun 490 S4D]jop paspuny 0M} Jo wns ay} Yyz40M S12 ay shins usoms Butag S14} ‘Spas pun spuDy ino ssaUuziyy ° "uonan sy? ua quinjg ay2 fo 4anovad Row “pursed open 3$09 Yons HD TuDpuaforT sur lind HOUR ee Pe Te ae ~ Sryumg ayn fi ‘danamoy ‘pron aq 0} ‘sanzjog JO WINS ay} Ur ‘UO17}00 SIy] U1 yuDpUafeg ay} ojun punog saqjasano abpajmouyan any LSNIVOV \ “ALNNOO™ *74no7) 4014adng ay2uy =< *YNITONVD HLNON SAO FDLY¥LS ‘d ‘f ‘sung L061 2 3 Q oc a a. oO < _ VSI | 4-2 es | Be fai toe aust [a7 Pha oh. amet Oe front dParmarand aerttee get [eg of Patet 1903 2~ Por Croan If o lo wie Cth nesally Ae rob Ataw abo Phorajpbeaiclyf | ck Los A haga aber fora Lif fra hanna Dobra For Rat Br fla 2Y hae ha a rudant of fees blake Beha Le amet hao hom a petrol ¢ fhe Va? ob mth Carebna gnere Yar Lor gunve gupt feerbnes Meapbp Uf fia Gonphaied tng Fat Pe facd brvor out forth fae ddd fat ad Fhe Lonsleg/ molamanns shtoling bliosen hora nab Ha dbnatent [fi Aan he haselrnt mol fe hRehol.ncd fir tered distharguel foo trey [2 Aeinbed ofan orel Gaunithen. ioe bi frvel amet ep ht Giga dine Lngg ein Orne epierromnet negs Hat Ss frac® Ot fob inf : tbrrn vr LOk Cmrreplarct fer Feat Tells bik of hn angfarmatin frrere bade ancthley acd | BA hs (ot Cflarect arntonadr unt f Lod o by Orbraeer habbbibiigs for haurbared cnet Lavra 5 lect for the forerfawref bhuing frsrh — SOR Reet © regrermeamte ata EAN | enete dgpmnedit prone, smehadier then® cri seis diac! ek moo ne ei So ee Fad dart fools Ae hare ok rhe haw Naren — for Orne Plorvook = fle bcos Te sffabogs of fos ga plo 1 wont Met the ev | eaten avenge Asetalet of Re onset iaRag fort Bo iit. ES ee ele ¢ Uthatak sg aE EES EE PEE e i aaa cg ecco oe lhe bearable for Orerne Haran rive Le Maple of Fi Boncplait senet Bat the av _| Sear harr 2 Aesetlent of Re ont See Rag boom | aoe | yor a yao | Sem ant <e “SA sIssnh ‘SUI S lease Note: Docu Repeated Intentionally pont Sims, Gussie vs. Sims, J. P. 1907 ‘d ‘f ‘sug L061 2 Q S n = o < - North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County, Gussie Sims, vs Order of Publication. J. P. Sims, It appearing from the affidavit of Harry Burke, in this action, that J. P. Sims, the defendant therein, is not to be found in Iredell County, and cannot after due diligence be found in the State, and it further appearing thet said action is brought by Gussie Sims for the purpose of obtaining & divorce from the ssid J. P. Sims: It is, therefore, ordered that notice of this action be published once a week for six weeks in The Into. bot & newspaper publiched in Iredell County, setting forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same, together with a brief recital of the subject matter of the same, and requir- ing the defendant to appear at the next Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to be held on the 5th Monday in Octo- ber, 1906, at the courthouse in said County, and anawer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff, or the relief therein demanded will be granted. -——— — / Clerk of the Superior Court. This the 42- day of September, 1906, et EEL OM LLL LEE ELL ILENE LOA Ror ence Sims, Gussie vs. Sims, J. P. 1907 ‘d ‘f ‘sug L061 = Q | n 2. @ < t North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County, Gussie Sims, vs ATT PA VIS, J. P. Sims, Harry Burke, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That in the above entitiead action now pending in the Super- ior Court of Iredell County, the Sheriff of saia County has returned the Summons issued to him in said action endorsed: "J. P. Sims is not to be found in Iredell County"; that the defendant therein cannot after aue diligence be found within the State; that said defendant is a proper party to said ac- tion, and this action is brought by Gussie Sims for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from the said J. P. Sims: Wherefore, the said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of summons be made on eaid defendant by publication in some newspaper publiched in Ire- dell County, North Carolina, This the 47. day of September, 1906, TAM Chit) me CHA ‘Dv \ Sims, Gussie vs. Sims, J. P. 1907 ‘d ‘f ‘sug 2 P Q © 2. o a L061 eel Sims, Gussie vs. Sims, J. P. 1907 ‘df ‘sug 2 3 Ma Q e ”n oN o < _ L061 Sis Cp Slamnneg Severe / FOP ie _ see janet bry Rawk chm Da orkols oro aceel fa gedrs0 on oe Sh i Freavofaar Crrrtrebina cncel aly cbpsd Ly ie Fi phan DY) ane te Af potarnt be hirrrlor ant fat ts | ple Lo Bilin for ancl bec thagid fa anol abl ! Mts for Ph~ redbnolpol list Lhe folriitif > ffen nob > Lr hiked arPk th» Ornot Bk of flo acl Bk, ap abby Sx | lat gf Hes Bool Sims, Gussie vs. Sims, J. P. 1907 >? e ~stev —_. - ‘ oh ‘ cosy ‘ ® « ‘ “a” u > < s . ysOynconp FOR ELIE? —ute. parinted pod for sale by Brady Printing, Company, f ye s tesville, N. C, ‘ pasecer* _ County=In the Superior Court. sTuUlyy ‘adig “SA Sopreyy ‘odig 9161 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Garolina. po ee To the Sheriff of aan ches.. ony GREETING : YOU ARE HEREBY conta to summon _, #4 <4 the defendant_. above named, ited abe found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be’ held for the County ot.) AA ofA £X___at the Court House in OE the £AMonday after the Jak Monday. of. Lipp Liaanker..., the same ‘being mr a ay of Cite 191.4-_, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if_<24+4_they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this A+ 4-1 day of J Nlerk of( Superior Cheat aa 2 teh County. UA ON Too CVO Hl con Treqdurspoyy ad ynougta deoy o4%q¢ y ( ( JUBpUsJoq 24} se yso0 HUAI 9} Jr ‘IOA9MOY see boner mae oper owe laxyene SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Returnable ton? Kg Ltr Term, 191%. __ ZUBPuesep SUy, OM poutosuUT Butacy * ‘ouesul ou9 AOZ TeyT PFeS 04 aavuep zo osneoeq uosazed Y C % of the Superior Court of_at2uéu22/£ County. + J7eUg ry PTes JO OfnEDEq ODTATOS TrUOS.ze 7994772277 Lob Jo Aep--------siy} eur axoyeq poqizosqns pue 0} WIOMG “IF ‘suorjnoexe Wor ydutexe Aysodoid pue sarytiqer ‘s}qep SITY 9AOge pue a0A0 4 lial i ail “m0T}0e SITY} UT —--~-~ZryUre_g ey} JO toAooer Lvur ------ ! ' ' ' t ' 1 ! ' ' ' ' ' i ' ' { 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ' _ =} — ! ' ' I Aa Nn bee be ren He a we mee ey EDGR GL YTS STEER SETS DRE TES o oT TRSMUDTE 757 TTS SOON BO PENNE a8i0 seep yous ie ~~ "yaepueszeq ey} Aud 'peus-----~---------------------- 6 CUvSUT PTes UO Puy oq 4ZOUNEO SoTAZOS TrrOstOC myor "aq *quepueqguzaodns ou, **p yu Suoguuaoy ge ou} UT peutyu0o Suzeq GOGT TeStASY OVP UOTQD9S SOS *UOTYCUIOY peutnger st suoumms styy *oxoseroyy *uoszod owesut brawn SIB[[Op peipuny om} Jo wns 94} yWIOM st ey shes ul0MS Buleq ---------------------------~~---_ Sipe, Charles vs. Sipe, Minnie 1916 Sruury| “odig "SA Sopreyy ‘odi S 9I6I North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. January Term, 1918. Charles Sipe, PlaintifrT, rece alsiseigARRIR Jiion a oan AF Raby phil St nerds VER Minnie Sipe, Defendant. The Plaintiff, complaining of the Defendant, alleges: First. That the Plaintiff, Charles Sine, and Defendant, Minrie Sipe, were lawfully married on or about the 23rd day of August, 1906, and for some time thereafter lived together as man and wife. : ,second. That on or about one vear from the time of sajd Qarriace, the said defendant, Minnie Sipe, did commit adultery with one Ris Sigmon. Third. That the plaintiff had no knowledge or information: of said act of adultery on the part of the said defendant until Aabéut One year thereafter, when at said time, the defendant left the said plaintiff, and has not lived with the said plaintiff since. Fourth.That said defendant has been a resident of Iredell County, State of North Carolina for two vears prior to and next preceeding the time of filing this complaint. Wherefore, said plaintiff pravs the Court thit the aforesaid bonds of matrimony be dissolved, and he te restored to 211 rights and priviliges flowing therefrom, and for such other and further rolief as Lees in law he may be entitled to. ee ae A ME Mey Bar na : Attorney f Plaintig7r « stuuly ‘adig ‘SA S3]IBYD ‘adig 9161 North Carolina, Iredell County. Charles Sipe, the “laintiff in the foreroing entitled action, being sworn, doth say that he has read the foregoing complaint and that the facts set forth therein are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and wife, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated fror each other, but in sincerity and truth and for the caus°s mertioned in the complaint: that the facts set forth in said complaint have existed to his knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of the complaint: that he has teen 2 res- ident of the State of North Carolina for two vears next preeseding the Ae Heat? df filing of the complaint. Sworn to and subscrired to before me this the eee aay Of December, 1915. LP. i. : Spe Cg aru] ‘adig ‘SA Sa]qeyD ‘odig 9161 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. January Term, 1918. Charles Sipe, vs ) Application for avpointment of Guardian ad Litam. ) ) Minnie Sipe. To the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County. De. FF. Mayberry, Attorney for the Plaintiff in the above entitled action, is informed and believes, and respectfully showeth to the Court that the defendant in the above entitled action is a lunatic; that the said Vinnie Sipe, Defendant, is without general or testament- ary sfuardian; that the said lunatic iefendant has been serverd with Summons. The said D. RF, Vayberry, Attorney for the Plaintiff, therefore applies to your court to appoint some person to act as Guardian ad litam for the said lunatic defendant, and to represent her in the above entitled action. This the 6th day of January, 19168, STuUlpy ‘adi ‘SA sajzeyD ‘adig 9161 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1918. Charles Sipe, ) ) . vs Order. ) Minnie Sipe. It appearing to the satiafaction of the Court that the defendant, Minnie Sipe, in the above entitled action is a lunatic, and is without general or testamentary guardian, and it appearing that H. Burke, Esquire, is a suitable and discreet person to represent her. interest in this action, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Said H. Burke, Esquire, te and he is hereby appointed guardian ad litam of the lunatic defendant of the above entitled action, and he is hereby authorized and empowered to anpear§ and defend the same on her behalf, as such suardian. This the 6th day of January, 1914. va erk of Superior Court. eruUl] ‘adig ‘SA SapmeyD ‘adig 9161 North Cardlina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1914. Charles Sive, Plaintiff. va Answer of Guardian ad Litam. Vinnie Sipe, Defendant. H. Burke, Guardian ad Lita for the above “named defendant. ansversing the complaint + 1 the above entitled action, First. That the allegations contained in paragraph one of said complaint are admitted. second. That the allerations contained in vararrapvh two of Said complaint are untnue, and are therefore denied. Third. That the defendant has no knowledge sufficient to form » belief concerning the allegations contained in paragraph number thrse, and therefore same are denied. Fourth. Thst the defendant has no knowledge or information sufficient to for a belief concerning the allerations contained in pararraph number four, and therefore sare AY denied. 8 1is defendant having fully answered, vrays the court 2@ allowed to go without day, and recover the costs of this action against the plaintiff. - hare ea jo Aep "OTST ‘Aaeniged puc euy Stuy PeTtu t b Sipe, Charles vs. Sipe, Minnie 1916 sruUlyy ‘adig “SA Sopreyy ‘adig 9161 North Carolina, In the Suverior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 191A, Charles Sine, ) ) vs ) Tssues. ) ) Vinnie Sipe. First. Were plaintiff and defendant Ante rarried as alleged in the complaint? Answer Second. Has plaintiff been a resid Answer fi. for two years prior to the bringing of this action? Third. Did defendant commit adultery as allered Corplaint? Answer sTuUIy ‘adig ‘SA Sa]TeyD ‘odig 9161 ctieamnealataetel Carolina, in the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term,1916, AT = de ff NOTLCS Will. at y,llorth Carolina, liay 1916,make a motion to be seble neglict, <i se ate 7 pr eee Pec) ae sk Ps aa oe LUSeS » ViIEG Cl ] OFLU PE “divorce ae Se a Ve PH Mifare Sipe Defendant . Chalres Sipe Reasivedxkayxtiziciis Satire EEG Pseeat ved "tr wAeCceliveda dina yy t a i E & Sipe, Charles vs. Sipe, Minnie 1916 Stuur ‘adig ‘SA sapmeyD ‘odig 9161 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Sufuxexdauwery July 1916 Term. Charlie Sipe vs. AFVPIDAYV I 2 Minnie Sipe Se ee ee Ne ey, —, eG ee et H.Burke guardian ad litem for Minnie Sipe being duly sworn deposes and says: That he acted as guardian ad litem for Minnie Sipe,the defendant in the above entitled action which was tried at the January 1916 term of this court and a judgement rendered dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant on the grounds of adultery alleged to heave been committed by the defendant my with H.P.Sigmon on or about the day of August 1904 and filed a firmal answer denying the allegations of the com- plaint as to the alleged charge of adultery;that the defendant ant is informed and believes,is now and hes been for the past 7 1/2 years or longer totally insane and confined in the"State Hospital for the In- aane at Morganton,North Carolina";and that on account thereof she was in- capable of advising your affiant as to any defense that she may have; that et he did not know and could not learn by reasonable diligence the true facts in said case prior to the said trial;that your affiant did not know that the defendant had a child living which was the offspring of the marriage of the plaintiff gnd defendant;that he Sage to believalthat the vaxcdite Manan ara interested in the defendant and the re- sult of said suit knew of the said charge of adultery of the defendant and had full knowledge of the pendency of the said suit and the purpose of the same and therefore he believed that if any evidence to controvert the said charge existed they would make the same known to your affiant; Your affiant further says that prior to the said trial he did not know who the witnesses for the plaintiff in the said action would be as no witnesses for him were ever subpoened and that he ee samme to believe thet the truthfullness of the said charge of adultery would be establish- ed by good and credible evidence and that for said reaséns your affiant stuUl ‘adig ‘SA SapmeYD ‘adig 9I6I : ‘ % ! inadvertantly and under a ni bayisshéneion as to the true fects aid not controvert the said charge of adultery at the said trial except to file a formal denying the same as above stated. that since the rendition of the said judgement he has been informed and believes that the parents of the said defendant nor her near rela- tives had any kmowledge whatever of the said charge of adultery against the defendant nor of the pendency of the said suit until after the ad- journment of the court at which the said judgement was rendered; thet they, © yauxrxatftantxtexinfexrmetxanitxhbetieavesywt*t have furnished your affiant with evidence which he believes would have successfully controverted the said charge of adultery;that since the rendition of the said judgement your affiant has been informed by responsible end disinterested citizens who know the general character and reputation of the seid H.P.Sigmon thet the same is bad;that the only witness produced at the said trial by the plaintiff who gave evidence es to the alleged act of adultery of the de- fendant was the said H.P.Sigmon himself who came ,your affiant is inform- ed and believes, as @ voluntary witness for the plaintifr inthe said case; that from reliable information which your affiant has received since the rendition of the said judgement he believes and avers that at the time of the said trial he was mistaken as to the true facts in this case and was taken by surprise by the pleintiff in the character of evidence he wes lead to believe would be offered to establish the said charge of adultery and that he inadvertently failed to controvert the said charge of adult- ery and the evidenve touching thereon at the said trial. That the defend ant,your affiant is informed,believes and elleges has a good and merito- rious defense in said suit;that the plaintiff,your affiant is informed and believes ,has not re-married since the rendition of the said judgement. Wherefore your affiant prayaxtkex as the guardian ad litem of the said defendant prays the court to set aside the judgement heretofore ren- “ dered in this suit. en A. See ca eo ge Sworn to es yy : of August 1916. x fo Notary Public. sTuUulpy ‘adig ‘SA SayreyD ‘adig 9I6I North Caroline, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Weumery July 1916 Term, Charlie Sipe VB. APFPIDAVI™T Minnie Sipe John feel being duly sworn deposes and says:- That he is now and has been all his life a resident of Iredell County;that he has known Minnie Sipe from infancy and thet for many years he was her Sunday-school superintendent;the he knews her character and reputation well from early child-hood until she was committed to the In- Sane Asylum and that same was excellent. Your affiant further saya thet he does not of his own knowledge know the general character and reputation of H.&. Sigmon, the pleintiff's witness in the said suit but has been informed by many reliable and re- sponsible chtizens who do know his character and reputation that the same is bad and that he is considered unworthy of belief. Your affiant further says that he is not related in any way to any of the parties to this suit. Sworn to and subscribed before me wit netted NAMES ATM 916] sruulyy ‘odig ‘SA SapqeyD ‘adig North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Irédell County. July 1916, Term. Charlie Sipe vs. AFP IVA VT T. Minnie Sipe W.H. Stewart being duly sworn deposes end Says : kak That he is now and has been all his life @ resident of Shiloh Town- ship,sais county and state;that for the last ten years he hes known H.P, Sigmon personally and livea within a mile of him; that he knows his gener. _ &@l cheracter and reputation and that the seme is vada. Sworn to before me this August 7,1916. Le dtyies, - North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County. July 1916 Term. Charlie Sipe vs .iMtiunke AVVIDAYV IS. Minnie Sipe F.1L. Pope being duly sworn deposes and Says :- Thet g rea the Mash He defendant in the above entitled suit;that the plaintiff and defendant were married on or about August 23rd 1906;that on or about January lst 1907,your affiant is informed and be- lieves they moved to the "Perkins Place",where your affiant ia informed RRixkeitervese the alleged act of adultery of the defendant with H.P.Sig- mon is alleged to have been committed;that about six weeks before the plaintiff and defendant moved to the seid "Perkins Place" yeurxatftant the defendant became pregnant and that about two months thereafter she began to lose her mind;that as the state of her pregnancy advanced her mental condition grew gradually worse until about the first of July 1907 she became insane;that on August 10th,1907 she gave birth to a still-born child and from that date she was in a helpless physical condition and con-~ fined to bed until until about Sept.5th,1907 when she was moved by the plaintiff,on account of her insane and helpless physical condition,to the | home of his father and that they did not return to the said "Perkins Place” any more to live;that about October 1st,1907 the began to partially re- cover her health and her mental condition Slightly improved until about the first of December 1907,when she became pregnant with her present child (which was born Sept. 7th,1908) ; that soon after the beginning of the said pregnancy,your affiant is informed and believes,the defendant again began to lose her mind and on or about the middle of March 1008 she be- Game violently insane and had to be forcibly confined until she was taken committed to the Hospital for the Insane at Morganton,North Carolina,on or about Oct.30,1908,at which place she is now and hes been ever since confined. That the defendant being insane was forcibly taken to the said Hos- STU ‘adig ‘SA SapreYD ‘odig 916! pital by Mr.C.L.Gilbert,Deputy Sheriff,on or about Oct.30,1908;that the plaintiff accompanied them and that from srid time until about two years ago,your affiant is informed and believes,the plaintiff visited ‘the de- fendant at least once a year and that fmom said time until about two years ago the plaintiff frequently wrote letters to your effiant and her family,some of which she now has,and that he frequently talked with your affiant and in all of the said letters and conversations the plaintiff always mentioned the defendant and spoke of her in terms of respect ,af- fection and endearment and seemed heart-broken at the improbability of her recovery so that they) could live together again as man and wife - nev- er once intimating by wore or deed that he even questioned the virtue and fidelity of his wife,the defendant,and not until your affient heard of this suit which was during the letter pert of February 1916,did she know that a charge of infidelity to her marriage vow had ever been made or Suspected yxkkeagsinst the defendant by the plaintiff or any one else and not until the said time had she ever heard of the said suit. set Sworn to before me this 8th day Notary Public. a f 4 ya, ge ue tes In the Superior Court, July 1916 Term North Carolina stu ‘adig "SA sopreyy ‘adig Iredell County. S161 Charlie Sipe V8. AP FIDAY 22. Minnie Sipe. R.A. Pope being duly sworn deposes and says:~ That he is the father of Minne Sipe,the defendant in the above entitl- ed suit;that since the time that the Plaintiff in said action alleges that he learned of the alleged act of adultery of the defendant he has seen and talked with the pleintif? many times;that many times has he been &@ visitor in the home of your affiant and that never did he mention the said charge to your affiant and that your affiant never heard of the said charge nor of the said suit until ebout the 20th day of February 1916- Sometime after the judgement dissolving the bonds of matrimony between | the plaintiff and defendant had been rendered: that go secretly and clen- destinely did the pleintiff,your effiant is informed and believes ,prose- cute the Said suit that the near relatives of the defendant who live in the immediate neighborhood of the plaintiff never heard of the seid charge. against the defendant nor of the said suit until after the judgement | above referred to was rendered;that your affiant knows the general charac- | ter and reputation of the plaintiff's witness H.P.Sigmon,whom your affiant | is informed and believes,was the only witness that testified at the trial | of this action as to the alleged act of adultery of the defendant with him;thet the character and reputation of the said H.P.Sigmon is bad and that he is a man unworthy of belief. That if your affiant hed known of ¢ the said suit he would have produced evidence at the mutt trial thereof which he verily helieves would have successfully vontroverted the said charge of adultery ageinst the defendant;that he believes and avers that the said judgement was secured upon evidence which was false;that an un- mitigated fraud was perpetrated against the defendant and a grave miscar- riage of justice made in the rendition of the said judgement Wherefore your affiant,the father and natural guardian of the defendant STU ‘adig ‘SA SopTeyy ‘odig 9161 the sole support of her only child which is the offspring of her mar- ‘Tiage with the t,begs to $hie join in the prayer of the guardian ad litem for the defendant for and in behalf of her whom God alone can make it possible for-herto speak in her own behalf in an earthly Court, that the judgement rendered in this suit at the January 1916 term of this court be set aside. Sworn to before me this the Notary Public. oruury ‘adig ‘SA SajreYD ‘adig 9I6I aus om fstel d Segoe ga Awvtiry a Matfer ree Ll bry ee age eg oe aug tt ba rs, <oth—r Le s Ia ; ae Ae 4 pe ft fare + oe ge io O wy 40 ent AG Penk LrA & p> f ee si Att tf tAtghtrk Re T1146 Cee aa es QhA lee CC erat foo ¢, oan i ; f Vieut a DT et ee je $s ey oe A> / the Cf “A € Beutrage A stu] ‘adig ‘SA SapmeyD ‘odig 9161 H.Burke being duly sworn deposes and says:- Thet bextexthe ie Sipe, Charles vs. Sipe, Minnie — 1916 Lente g sIUUIy dig ‘SA SoyTeyy ‘dig North Carolina, In the Superior Court, 9I6I Iredell County. July 1916 Term. Charlie Sipe vs. 25 int JUDGEMEN®, Minnie Sipe This cause coming on to be heard before His Hénor Frank Carter, Jugge Presiding,upon the motion of H.Burke,guardian ad litem for the defendant Minnie Sipe,to have the judgement rendered in this case at the January 1916 Term of this court set aside upon the grounds set forth in the affi- davits filed in the said motion,and being heard,and the court finding that the facts set forth in the seid affidavits are true and thet the Seid judgement was taken against the seid defendant my through mistake, inadvertance,surp ise and excusable neglect and the court further find- ing as a fact eae has a good and meritorious defense in the said suit: It is,therefore, hereby ordered and decreed thet the tim judgement rendered in this case at the January 1916 Term of this court dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the said plaintiff and defend- ant be and the same is hereby set aside, G2. (i he Pe Se nwve. sTuUI ‘adig ‘SA Sa]TeYD ‘adig 9161 orl ‘adig ‘SA SajqeYyD ‘odig 9161 North Carolina, Iredell County. Charlie Sipe VSe Minnie Sipe In the Superior Court, July 1916 Term, JUDGEMEN?, this ¢ause coming on to be heard before His Honor Frank Carter, Ju@ge “residing,unon the motion of Minnie Sipe,to have the jud i. Burke guardian ad litem for the defendant gement rendered in this case at the Janua Term of this court set &side upon the grounds set forth in the affie » > the facts gs judgenent 2 A Jn ey 5 . 2 “ +A inacdcvertance surprise and Pom dh £4 & L864 tna u Sid suit: motion,and being heard,and the court finding Said affidavits are trne and that the taken agsinst the Said defendant ig through mistake, excusedle neglect and the court further finde fo0d and heritorious defense in eby ordered and decreed that the xen Judgement rendered in this case at the January 1916 Term of this court dissolving the bonds of matrimony between the Said plaintiff ana defends o@ 8nd the same is hereby set eside, -— -— - - oo. a ae we ~ +. Judge residing. 3-29-’011M AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. L, F, Sloan State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of ‘d “J Ueos wa 5 +e) - wn 6 a. GQ @ = r < - L061 above named, if .... 8°... be found within your Ccunty, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of ...... -redell ae Monday $R@ ik the same being the . 28% day of Jdany....4907... and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if .8@..... fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff. will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this .....6%. j i § }4 t é ¢ Se neon Seen eC eats “ALSAWSP 9} eI1qGeUInjJay HHTAY YOd SNOWMDS i” - / ' ~TTeps ay yuayg LSNIVOV “Use Ts “Fy “weBpoy “UOT Laetitia pearooy ‘A “7 ‘ueolg on £F epegt jO janO) Jouedng aq} jo “quepiiezep ouy Sueots “aT 04} SUOlMitis styt Surpeer fq : LS hehe Dl STE TON ‘AMUIONY syuurerg "te f "AUG “Mg {+t ; oy o © B wy o a. GQ a = r < - i o61 Miiay L061 « “suornaaxe wodf yduaxa Ajsadoad pun $91}111901) ‘sqqap siy anogn pun 4000 S4D]jOp padpuny omy yo wns ay) yz40m s2 ay shvs usoms Burag Squid ay fo'sanoves Row =--~gun ‘ALNNOD™ “FAno) so1sadng ayy uy ) “‘¥NITONVOD HLNON 4O ALYLS North Carolina # In the Superior Court, Iredell County # January Term 1907, Rodger L, Sloan # vs, # Complaint, LL. Fe Sloan # The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges:— First:— That on the #day of December 1904, in the County of Iredell and State of North Carolina, the plaintiff and the defendant intermarried, and ever since said time the bonds of matrimony have been and still are, existing between said parties, Second:— That the plaintiff is and has been a resident of the State of North Carolina, for a period of two years and more, ‘d “J ‘Ueojg immediately preceding the commencement of this action, A ° $e) P yw ° a. ga @ — r < " Third:- That at the time of the said marriage the defend-— L061 ant was pregnant; that the defendant concealed the fact of her pregnancy from the plaintiff until after said marriage; that the plaintiff, at the time of the marriage was ignorant of the pregnancy of the defendant and did not discover the same until after said marriage; that soon after the said marriage, to-wit: on or about the 14th day of February i905, the said defendant gave birth to the child with which she was pregnant at the time of the marriage; that this plaintiff was not and is not the father of the child with which the defendant was pregnant at the time of said marriage, Fourth:— That there has been no issue of said marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant, Wherefore, the plaintiff demands judgment that the bonds of matrimony between the LAL the, defendant be dis— solved, Ce hee A <7 or the Plaintiff. Rodger L. Sloan, plaintiff in the above entitled action for divorce, being sworn says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; that ‘d “T Ueos — ° © B ©] © a. go @ “ m < < L061 the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between husband and wife, the plaintiff and defendant, not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincer- ity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint as grounds for divorce, have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint; that the complaint has beem a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years and more next preceding the filing of the complaint. ‘ Sworn to and subscribed before ages Z Abo me this the Pay of January 1907, A erk Superior Court, ‘d “J ‘Ueols 2 o be) Ms wn o Qa. ge @Q — m < s L061 North Carolina # Iredell County # Roger L. Sloan # vs, + Is eu es; LL; FS Slean it 1, Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer:— - 2. Was the defendant, at the time of said marriage pregnant, and was the plaintiff at said time ignorant of the fact of such pregnancy as alleged in the complaint? Answer:— Yt Yj | 3. Is the plaintiff the father of the child with which the wife was pregnant at the time of said marriage? ) bh answer:-7// /) FLA 4, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceding the filing of the complaint? Sloan, Rodger L. vs. Sloan, L. F. 1907 e oh, le tA eee oe A i Sloan, Rodger L. vs. Sloan, L. F. 1907 Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Prircted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Original Summons, or o names therein Every copy of same Bond, including Tustification....)....rrecer ree scuaindbbdicsubalagsinekonsh Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond and and Justification Order of Arrest +Subpena, each name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. .. -.-si,s.+es-seretereee Continuance Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing Issuing Commission Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate Notice, for each name over one in same papet...... ..... Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support Docketing same D ting ex parte Proceedings Judgment../.. Sere een ; ” Summons Indexing Judgment.....,....cecccce ccesssece seeneesssnseneeencsenenseeeeserense es Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgment. Executton ofa Sheriff's Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal Transcript to Supreme Court............ copy sheets, each County Tax, when Jury impaneled Constable Magistrate. .......2se000+ Ct me Plaintiff's Witnesees.......x7. . CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS-CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) Sloan, Rodger L. vs. Sloan, L. F. 1907 <. North Carolina In The Superier Ceurt Iredell County Jany Term 1907 Alexander Smith Vs. Cemplaint. Pelly Smith . The plaintiff abeve named complains of the defendant , and alleges : First: That on the day of y LA whip LEKT. at . Osis the State of Nerth Carelina ,the plaintiff and Gefendent intermarried ,and ever since have been and now are ,husband ana wife . Second: That the plaintiff is and has been a resident cf the State of North Carolina ,for a period of Twe years and more immedi- ately preceeding the commencement of this action oe Third: Thggn the, day of , 190%, at the residence oF plaintiff ii fetes” the etenaunt committted adultery with a man whose name is unknown to plaintiff. Fourth : That as palintiff is informed and beleives fer some davs before and after said date defendant committed adultery with said man and with otner men to plaintiff unknown ;that when plaintiff would be eway at work on nis farm ,defendant would so and remain ina pawdy house in Concord N.C. for several days and nishts at a time corm mitting acts cf adultery with men whose names are to plaintiff unknown That on the day of Wfrrk ——_— 1906 defendant left ees teh plainii<é home and id went away with a man by the,name of Dot Teavine the city of Concecrad with the said c we an@-ever since said date her whereabouts is tc plaintiff unknown . Fifth . That each and ell of said acts of adultery were com mitted without the consent ,connivance , privity or procurement of the pleintiff ,and the plaintiff has not cohabited with the defendant since the discovery bv him of the commission by the defendant of the several acts cf adultery complained of. Wherefore plaintiff demands judpement , that theggends of matrimony between himself and the defendant he dissolved and fo costs / { of this action to be taxed by the clerk of this “ourt 47 Y, J h17- Fe Atterney es plaintiff. Nerth Carolina Iredell County. Alexander Smith , plaintiff abeve named , after being Guly swern deposes and says : That the foregoing complaint is true of his ewn Knowledge execpt these thines therein stated en information and beleif and as to those he beleives it te be true ; That said compl- aint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and the defendant nor for the mear purpose cf beeing freed and separated from each other but in sincedrity and truth for the causes set forth therein : That the facts set forth as grounds fer this action have ex- isted te the knowledge cf the plaintiff for six months before the bring- ins of this action and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the state of North Carolina for two yers and more next before the commen- p A dhy en MtUttt Wf A Acc tetas a Ue aac don J wr pie | hes L¢, hing of Alte. FIC Gtr ia forte. cemnet of this action . This the agth day ef Dec 1906 “Soe wt YU ae a CA. Ce ce Gees aul, fb Se TL. : oe ig eal Gon eye er bf OG, “pe ae Hapjewget, Lg fe, Spite orth Carolina In the Superior Court redell County Alexander Smith vs Polly Smith earins from the affidavit of Aloxander Smith in thi that Polly Smith the defendant therein, is not to be found in Iredell County, and can not after due diligence be found in the * State, and it further appearing that sane ‘tébao an action for @.w absolute divoree, under Sub Section atReesion 1561 of the Revisal of 1905: It is therefore order that notice of this action he publish- ed once 2 week for four weeks in the Landmark, a newspaper published in Iredell County, setting he title of the action, the purpose of the same, together with ie cital of the subject -matter of the same, and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County , to be held on the 28th day of January , 1907 at the court house in said county, and answer or demur to the complaint of th ylaintiff or the relief therein de- 9.0 1detlinees Sup erior Court manded will be granted. This the North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Te Cys rae sas / G07 HR Alexander Smith vs AP PL DAVE T: Polly Smith Alexander Smith being duly sworn, deposes and says ; That in the ahove entitled action now pending the the Super- S Court of Iredell County, the sheriff of said county has returned summons issued to him in said action endorsed"Polly Smith is not to be found in Iredell County:" that the defendant therein can not after due diligence be found within the State; that said de- fendant is a proper party to said action, same being an action An for absolute divorce i Sub-Section 2 1 Section A 1561 of the Revisal of 1905; tums said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of summons be made on said de- fendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County North Carolina. f Dated this 3rd, day of December, 1906. ee Zech Mh carelion t= a. 2 eE- Pak jit Dez b20- 3 = /$e DRA Matititer AO Serer eer Ear ae min erent paimneeetseaitnrernemermemantieannepen=r vane setennter rR Pepe BNEE STE SITE ERIE RRO Ree ges BNorth Carolina Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1907, Alexander Smith vs UD G Be eT Polly Smith This cause caning on to be heard at this perm of the Cours before His Honor Frederick Moore, Judge, and a Jury, and His Fonor having submitted the following issues to the Jury: "--First--Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? --S¢cond-- Has plaintiff been a resident of the State for more than two years as alleged in the Complaint? --Third-- Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the Complaint?" And the Jury having answered. each of the issues "Yes"; It is thercfore, considered adjudged, and decreed by the Court that the Badsof matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and th hereby dissolved. Judge Presiding. DM 5. P bo ° a Be ° 2 clé6l ‘SA One “YNWS SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. County.-- Gn the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Cardlina.. To the Sheriff of N. 1 MELE a) County--GREETING: Wou are thereby Commanded to summon AL Se i Go}jare \ ued } i (cay the defendant (assy) our Superior ; = at the Court " iouse tn the same being the % s which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court'for Sdid! Codtitiwitliin the firsd thrée’ days'of said:‘Tertt; and let said Defetidant!:!. oitaké notice if AU. they fail to atiswer to “thesaid’ couplet’ within that time, the plaintiff...<..will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint." Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due' return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this... le. day oO Vt4- “~ pears oe JO JIN0D soLedng en} jo "94 a]qQuasINya xy 131738 YO SNOWWAS *AsnIOHY SAE I 61 ‘ma],~ NN BB > > BE Px Be von O W< oy ww Ss Sl6l SI} IMI a1OJaq peqiiosqns pue 0} DIOMG *suOIjNDexe w10I3 ydmaxa Aysadoid pue sartiqer] ‘s}qap sty 2Baoqe pu 10A0 SI¥][Op pespuny OM} jo us 3} 40M st aq Shes BIOMsS BuIIq quepurjeq a4} 0jUN punog saajasino a3pe;mouyoe 3A, ‘yunog Joedng 3943 Uy \ “¥NITONYO HLNON SAO SLY¥LS North Carolina, : In the superior Court» Iredell County. $ November Term=1911, Hattie Smith vs, Affidavit, Boss Smith, Hattie Smith,being duly Sworn,deposes and says: That in the above entitiled action now pending in the Superior court of Tredell coumty, the sheriff through his deputy,C.1,. McKnight ,of Said county has returned the..aummons issued to him in Said action endorsed " not+ to he found in t the county": that, the defendant therein after due diligence cannot be ‘ s v ‘ : found in the State of North aro}ike: *lat said ie°endant is a broper party io said actiow; that the action is for absolute divorce on the grounds of formication and adultry; wherefore the said Plaintiff prays that an order may be made hy the court fhat service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper <table ehagte < Sworm to emd subscribed before me this the 19th day of Sept’,1911. published in Iredell} county ,N.C, NN 5.8. o> et PP Se a s. om OD Ww < oy a — a meee fggBiRi cas ostese RBIS OR Notary Public; My commission expires January, 3d, 1911¢ Sl6l Nn 3. -* P D © ”n ~” ~~ w © DH — clé6l NM B. = - he = =. oO a » Se Re oer Se ee North Carolina, t In the Superior Courts _ Iredell County, : November Term-1911, Hattie Smith ¢ ve, $ Order of Publication, Boss Smith, +: . « ‘ ‘ It appearing fiom the aifidavit of Mattie Smith irx this action, that Boss Smith the defendant therein,is not to be found in Iredell county, and cannot aiter due diligence be found imnthe State of North Qarolina, and it further appearing. that. this action-is for diverce because of formication and adultrv: : \ It is therefore ordered,that notice of this action he published once a week for thirty days im the Yoorssville Enterprise,a newspaper published in Iredell ccounty,N.C.,settime forth the title of the action,the purpode of the same,and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of the Superior court of Trede?l county,to be held om October Z0, 19ll,at the court house ir Statesville,N.C.,and amswer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff,or the relief demanded will be rranted. Clerk superior Court, This, the 20th day of Sept.,1911. DN B. o> PY wD ° ~D ” ~~ wo © WN oS Sl6l N 5. oo & ry = =. o < Y Worth Carolina, t Im the cuperior Court. Ired#ll County, ¢ Novewher Term-1921, ~ne eth : Nobiée. Boas Smith, 3 The defendant above named will take notice that am action entitled as above has been commemced in the superior court of Tredell coumty to obtain am absolute diverce om the grounds of fornication and adultry; amd the said defendant will further take motice that he is required ‘o appear at the next term of the superior court of said county to be held on theS0th day of Cctober,1911,at the court house of Said county in Statesville,N.C.,and amswer or demur to the complaint in Said action,or the plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief demanded in said complaint, LEZ 7 Clerk Superior Court?, . This the 20th day of Sept.,1911¥ ~”N B. P w ° a a B o a cl6l "SA oIyyBH “YIWS North Carolina, Tredell County. In the Superior Court- As of October TOY Trt 7 2. Hattie Smith +: bie : Complaint, Boss Smith. : The plaintiff comp lations. the defendant alleres and says: 1. That Hattie Smith and Boss Smith were united in marriare on April 29, 19086 in the county of Stanley,State of North Carolina and the said marriage relation has existed up to this time an@ still exists. 2, That sometime durime the vear 1907 the said Bors Smith deserted the seid plaintiff and tt venkntitetetx did commit fornication and advitrv with T.aura Shoe, S. That sometime after the said Boss Smith deserted the said Hattie Smith Ne] and at various times thereafter ,the said Boss Smith @id commit fornication and adultry with one Dell Dunlap. 4. That the said Hattie Smith has not lived with the said Foss Smith since the aforesaid acts were committed and has in no wire condoned the said offenses, ‘ an Wherefore the said plaintiff prays that the court will grant her,absolu divorce and give judgment that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant te disolved and that cost be taxed by the clerk according to the statuted in such cases made and provided, ttornev cfon the Pi; North Carolina, Tredell Gounty. Rattie iff in the above entitled actic being duly sworn deéposes and savs that the acts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true ,except as to those matters therein stated on information and belief 2s to those things she believes it to he true ¢ tnat the said eaonniaint not made out Tevity or bv colluskéen hetween huehand andawife and not mere purpose beine freed from each ane@ separated,but in 1d truth for the causes" mentionéd tn complaint; that the ibove set forth have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff at six months prior to the filing of this complaints; that the said ntiff has been a resident of this State for more thantwo years prior Lasuine of the summons in this action and filing of the complaint. Ee om a subscribed before the Pfth dav of Nec, ,1°7 — x *») + pe sit : 1 bE? reat, Smith, Hattie vs. Smith, Boss (Bost) 1915 N 3. => P wD © ~” ~” — DW © 3 — cl6l NM 3. - = = & =. a < v? (jsog) ssog “yyWS ¢l6l SA ORY “YUE — NOTICE. ee cronte: In the Superior Court Iredell County, | November Term, 1911 _ Hattie Smith vs. Boss Smith. . The defendant above tamed will take otice that afr action entitled as above ! ae Superior ict haf to obtain an ab- E HE ( vore on ee of forni- souls the said defend- further take notice that he is uit NOTICE. North. Carolina, ) In the Superior Court Iredel} County, § November Term, 1911 Hattie Smith vs. Boss Smith. The defendant above named will take notice that-afr action entitled as above has been commenced in the Superior court of Iredell county to obtain an ab- solute on the mds of forni- cation adul ; and the said defend- ant will further take notice that he is ired to appear at the next term of perior court of said county to be held the 80th day of October, 1911, at — the court house of said county in States- ville, N; €., and answer or demur to the complaint in said action, or the. plaintiff will dpply to the court for the relief demandea in said comet ep { J. A, HARTNESS-~ % Clerk Superio. This the 20th day of Sor" fo (jsog) ssog ‘yyWS SA d17eH “UWS pnt \o WN (sog) ssog “yuWws ‘Oo Nn SA O1NBH “WS NOTICE. North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County, | November Term, 1911 Hattie Smith vs. Boss Smith. The defendant above tamed will take notice that afr action entitled.as above has been commenced in the Superior court of Iredell county to obtain an ab- solute divorce on the unds of forni- cation and adultrry; and the said defend- ant will further take notice that he is required to appear at the next term of Superior court of said county to be held on the 30th day of October, 1911, at the court house of said county in States- ville; N; €., and answer or demur to | the complaint in said action, or the plaintiff will dpply to the court for the relief demandea in said complaint. ny: all @) lerk Superio. This the 20th day of = f » n B. ms cg ee) ° n n o—_ w oS Ss tet \o — nN N B. oo i= ro S =. oO < ”n Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N.C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; To THE SHERIFF OF... Coss wi HEREBY COMMANDED ie <ul tt ae potent Mewes Mea cans Spans secstrengetcsi hs ic me —Moenday after the Ol She tify the truth. to say in behalf of ina certain controversy befofe said Court depending, apg then and there to be tried, wherein oe Att~z2Z And this you shall in no wise omit, un a ‘ der the penalty prescribed by law. NN 5.2 PP Bx o 2 as n —~ Oo D< on 4 — Sl6l SUBPOENA--Civil. | 4 Ms 2A} NN 3.8 oe of BS we SS ae — O W< on n se Sl6l 3 5 wD ° B Bp ° 4 — cl6l N 3 P ay =. o. a < 4 North Carolina In the Superior Court. Iredell County ) Hattie Smith ) ) --vs-- ) COMMISSION TO TAKE DEEDSERIOR:- Bost Smith TO Hikes A Su tle. : GREETING: Sp aoa. special trust and confidence in your integrity,do authorize and empower you to cause S.G.Howard, Sam Smith and William Smith to appear before you at sudh time and place as you may appoint,and them,on oath to examine touching all such matters and things as they shall know of and concerning a certain matter of controversy in our Superior Court for the County of Iredell,pending,wherein Hattie Smith is plaintiff and Bost Smith is defendant. And the deposition in writing,by you so taken, the same to transmit,sealed with your seal,to our Superior Court,to be held for said County on the 13th day of Oct@ber,1913. Witness WascidnHanrtnessOlerk of saichfourtiat ofifiiee of Clerk of said Court,in Statesville,this the 12th day September, 1913 / Vd ku LAA. lerk oupersor “Court. oe North Carolina | Iredell County | I R.R.Clark,Editor of The Landmark,being duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing and attached"notiee to defendant of Deposition" was published and appeared in the said Landmark , beginning with the issue /2-Tg= of Sept for tee Oe te 09 de, Dept Conk bedx pp Met hans: : £ vo Asher L Breet | sonmeerse: We, reposing special trust and confidence in your do authorize and empower you to cause 5.G.Howard, Sam am Smith to appear before you at sudh time and n oath to examine touching all egrity, th and Willi ce as you may appoint,and them,o h matters and things 4s they shall know of and concerning & rtain matter of controversy in our Superior Court for the County Tredell, pending wherein Hattie Smith is plaintiff and Bost Smith And the deposition in writing,by you so taken, the defendant. pme to transmit,sealed with your seal,to our Superior Court,to be eld for said County on the 13th day of OctO@ber ,1913- Hartness, Clerk of saidhCourtiat oftine of Clerk of itness was A.» otember,1913/ aid Court,in Statesville,this the 12th day ve f ] j Mp Th MAS 4 ! “LU 1) ] LK Ag 7/C@lerk Superior Court. h Caroline | ell County | I R.R.Clark, Editor of fhe Landmark, being duly sworn, deposes e to defendant of Deposition" g with the issue notice says that the foregoing and attached" d in the said Landmark ,beginnin g published and appeare fz hes t for two consecutive, weeks. % “ts Wife Me the 27% do, Dept HE f At Tn os a 15 s- 1 ee ed Sep Piur-< A prere WN TO a caine special trust and confidence in your 5.G.Howard, Sam egrity,do authorize and empower you to cause th and William Smith to appear before you at sudh time and ce as you may appoint,and them,on oath to examine touching all sh matters and things 48 they shall know of and concerning 4 | rtain matter of controversy in our Superior Court for the County Tredell, pending wherein Hattie Smith is plaintiff and Bost Smith defendant. And the deposition in writing,by you so taken, the ame to transmit,sealed with your seal,to our Superior Court,to be 3th day of Oct6ber, 1913. Sourtiat offime of Clerk of eld for said County on the 1: itness was: A.vHartness, Clerk of ‘sath said Court,in Statesville,this the 12th day September, 1913 / f f £ 77@Terk Suoerior Court. NOTICE TO DEFENDANT or wxiP- VOSITION. North Cafolina—In th oa rg i¢ Superior Court. h To Bost. Smith: vs. Bost Smith. ‘Take notice that on the 29th day of Sep- whi “take the Gepositions of S. Sam Smith and William Smith id 7 ether, to be read as evidence for the plain- i in the above entitled action, which is tar tee t0 Say: eotike at : cay it NOTICE TO Chir s” ae ee ed h Carolina | ell County | y sworn,deposes fhe Landmark, being dul i R.R.Clark, Editor of to defendant of Deposition" oregoing and attached"notice says that the z e said Landmark ,beginning W ith the issue g published and appeared in th 2 tive weeks. Sept. fox “Ye consecu . - L2H % be Pe tre ay _ da. der a ‘id n- ot [Ga- Can-- CN hws UCR! N lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Arkeck LE “ie Sen : GREETING : We, reposing special trust and confidence in your , egrity,do authorize and empower you to cause 5.G.Howard, Sam lliam Smith to appear before you at sudh time and examine touching 411 th and Wi ce as you may appoint,and them,on oath to h matters and things 48 they shall know of and concerning 4 ontroversy in our Superior Court for the laintiff and Bost Smith County rmtain matter of ¢c 11,pending,wherein Hattie Smith is p n in writing,by you so taken, the urt,to be Irede defendant. And the depositio ame to transmit ,sealed with your seal,to our Superior Co eld for said County on the 13th day of OctOéber,1913- was: Ay Hartness, Clerk of satidh € ourt at ofik 5 +1 i1tvness seid Court,in Statesville, this the 12th day September, 1913 / r , f @lerk Superior Court. —- NOTICE TO 0 DEFENDANT wr roa P- x = Cafolina—In the | Superior Court. redell County. Hate Smith vs. Bost Smith. To Bost Smith: Take notice that on the 29th day of Sep- tember, 1913, at 1 o’clock, p. m., in the law office of R. L. Smith in the city of Albe- | marle, Stanly county, North Carolina, be- | —— fore R. L. Smith, commigsioner, the ber? nt will‘ take the Gepositions of S. ard, Sam Smith and William Smith Bor _| others, to be read as evidence for the plain- {| tiff in the above entitled action, which is . | mow pending in the Superior Court of Ire- dell county, State of North Carolina; and j a will further take notice that if the tak- ; of the said depositions is not completed | # on the said day, the same will be sontiane® ( to day until completed. a 4 Zeb. V. Tustington and Z, V. vate ae See Sept. 16, 2018. NOTICE TO Mr oo ov. IRS. : JW. _Nisholto~ a the firm~ of | fom * h Carolina | ell County | I ReR.Clark, Editor of The Landmark, being duly sworn, deposes Deposition" that the foregoing and attached"notice to defendant of p ee i * * s : e I with the issu ie and appeared in the said Landmark , beginning $s pu , utive weeks. Sept. “for, +99 eengenk Ave ee er His 9 p 7 HN fia Ebert f x 74 Pr Can. LM Pee UO! NA lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ger A Su Coe ‘GREETING : We, reposing special trust and confidence in your * , 5.¢G.Howard, Sam as do authorize and empower you to cause you at sudh time and egrity, th and William Smith to appear before e as you may appoint,and them,on oath to examine touching all h matters and things 4s they shall know of and concerning 4 tain matter of controversy in our Superior Court for the County ; : et ar ath Tredell pending wherein Hattie Smith is plaintiff and Bost Smit defendant. And the deposition in writing,by you so taken, the a j o be ame to transmit ,sealed with your seal,to our Superior Court,t ela for said County on the 13th day of OctOber,1913.- Hartness, Clerk of satidth € ourt at offiee oo: ‘ oO itness was di» 4 t i< t 6 « tr da y ve Vv ver iber 19 i ~ 5a Court,in States i116, Nis ne L ~ n ¢ 6v ? , 5 a SV LA: E erk suoerior Gourt. NOTICE TO DEFENDANT Yor weiP- OSITION. | North Carolina—In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Hattie Smith vs. Bost Smith. To Bost Smith: Take notice that on the 29th day of Sep- tember, 1913, at 1 o’clock, p. m., in the law office of R. L. Smith in the city of Albe- R marle, Stanly county, North Carolina, be- | —— fore R. L. Smith, commi$sioner, the under- signed will‘ take the depositions of S. G. Howard, Sam Smith and William Smith and others, to be read as evidence for the plain- (| tiff in the above entitled action, which is -|now pending in the Superior Court of Ire- dell county, State of North Carolina; and you will further take notice that if the tak- ing of the said depositions is not completed on the said day, the same will be continued from day to day until comaies : { SMITH, ‘ Plaintift.- | 4 Zeb. V. ‘Turlington and Z. V. Long, at- torneys for Plaintiff. _ = tah 16, 19138. NOTICE TO Chir on. IRS. J. W. peel a the firm~ of h Carolina | ell County | I R-R.Clark, Edito ng and attached"notice to defe nning with the issue r of The Landmark, being duly sworn, deposes ndant of Deposition" says that the foregoi j id lL k,begi 8 papi tenee and appeared in the seid Landmar g : weeks. C Chak Sept. for two consecutive, we Seer Mis Kf ener Noce tS Vet Te the 7 1 Q P *¢ ; at er TL oes ae rad CAan.-- LY pr<re d Ns Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally AM 3. 2. PS oe as DY jase —_~ O WD < o ¥ QA clé6l nm 8. E wD 3 a Be fo) a Sl6l TN 3. S as & 2. oO < “ North Oarolina {| In the Superior Court. Iredell County { Hattie Smith | Bost Smith Commission to take Deposition. To Robert L.Smith;GREETINGS: We/reposing speeial trust and confidence in your integrity, do authorize and empower you to eause S.G.Howard,Sam Smith and William Smith to appear before you at sueh time and plaee as you may appoint, and them,on oath,to examine touching all such matters and things as they shell know,of and concerning a certain matter of controversy in our Superior Court for the County of Iredell,pending wherein Hattie Smith is plaintiff and Bost Smith is defendant.and the depositions in writing,by you so taken,the same to transmit,sealed with your seal, to our Superior Court,to be held for the said County on the 13th day of Oetober,1913. Witness Jas.A.Hartness,Clerk of said Court at officenof said Court,in Statesville,this the 12th day of September,1913. J.A.Hartness (Seal) e perior Court. North Carolina;Iredell County : In the Superior Court. Hattie Smith | -Vs- | _NOTIGE TO DEFENDANT OF DEPOSITION. Bost Smith i 70 BOST.SMITH: Take notiee that on the 29th day of September,1913 at 1 o'elock P.M. in the law office of R.L.Smith,comnissioner,the under- @igned will take the depositions of S.G.Howard,Sam.Smith and William Smith and others,to be read as evidence for the plaintiff in the above entitled astion,whieh is now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County,State of North Carolina;and you will further take notiee that if the taking of the said depositions is not completed on the said day, the same will be continued from day to day until completed. tti Zeb.V.Long & | Attorneys for plain Zeb.V.Turlington | plaintiff. North Carolina | Iredell County | R.R Clark, Editor of the landmark,being duly sworn deposes and says that the foregoing and attached " Notiee to defendant of deposition" was published and appeared in the séa#a@ Landmark,beginning with the issue of September 12th,for two conseeutive wecks. R. ke or TK. Subseribed and sworn to before me the 27th day Sept.1913. (Seal) jno.A. Seott, Notary My commission expires re th,1915. North Carolina | Iredell County [| I,dno.LeMilholland, Deputy Clerk Superior Court of Iredell County do hereby certify that the foregoing and annexed is a true and perfect eopy of the proeeedings therein set out,had in the above entitled ease now pending in Iredell. Superior Court wherein Hattie Smith is plaintirf and Bost Smith Defendant. be 4 Witness my hend and the offieiaa = SH, Y ILL 0 Claud / seal of this Court the 27th day LOY, : A j Z Cee Muli lor fe Kiste uta) Gurr of September,1913. oe /. NN BB. PP 2 a &. am OD Ww < oy Z Sl6l North Carolina, Tredell County. State of North Carolina, to the sheri ather lawful officer, greeting: Whereas, the undersigned has received a commission from the — Sunerior Court of Tredell Count to hig directed, to summon “et 3 eS 2 a . « a ge ae ‘ ? ES ae William Smith, Sam Smith, and 8. G.. Harwood} ae witnesses in an ‘7 a . f? 5 Py j action pending in said court, wherein-Pattie for. Hattie) Smith is plaintiff, and Bost Smith, her husband, is defénddnt: 3 > : ‘ by the undersigned Now, therefore, you are hereby. commanded suumon said William Swmiti é Smith and 8.°G. Harwood} pérsonally -~ appear before said commissioner at the Gort” house in Albéuarle SETA COMIN 2 BE: Vie Een aes ot eptouter, 1913, at 10:30 A.N., j nd there to testify and the truth to say in ™Bhalf of the in said controversy. rein fail not, and have you then and 3 DMN BB. > oe oS st, o 2 & st. —~ O D<z oN n”n ieee id commissioner, Slé6l jon Commissioner. North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Tredell County. Hattie Smith, vs. DEP OB 1 tT 0 8. Bost Smith. Pursuant to the next commission to me directed, I, R. L. Smith Commissinner, under the authority thereof, on the 29th day of Sept, 1913, at 12:00 o'clock M., at the Isw:effice of R. L. Smith, in the town of Albemarle, County of gtanly, State of North Carolina, the plaintiff being represented by Z. V. Long, Esq., and the defendant being represented hy T. R. Burleyson, Esq., proceeded to take the deposition of William Smith, who being duly sworn to speak the truth between said plaintiff and yi ant, deposes and says: : Pte en ee cad FI je ak DN Be Pr Bx o ® as. a D< OV 4 $161 be it See crude a = Orbe; Eneonag Ae 42 fGeem os 7 ———- peek Muti Rh bhentge gn Yn ge | SA one] “WTUg ~N B. = P wD ° ~n 17) oy ee) ° n = Ses \o — Wa £ at Smith, Hattie vs. Smith, Boss (Bost) 3-15- 13-1M, MN 8.8 oo oF BE Px BR mn © W< 2 wn = clé6l be found within ae to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of...se7 ) at the Court House in on the. 44.2... Monday after the.......... ‘ scaait Monday of ...4.4°OOey th the same-being the... 4.9 Bes. day of 19197, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the ae Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and’ let said Defendant...*.....take notice if. 4e&.... they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. | 77°03 aiqeuanjay Asuioiyy s.ynurelg . rete 0 yoy s019dng ay} Jo es ‘ } a : , iaITza YOiI SNOWWAS — — EX, | no el} 9Ut S10Jjaq paquiosqns pue 0} nIOoMS ‘SHONNSaxe Wry Jdutaxa Aj1adoid pur saryifiqety ‘s}qap SIy aA0qe pur 13A0 Sie[OP peipuny OM} jo uns ay} 4II0M st aq Sh¥s IOMS BuIaq NN BB. BS oo o 28 a st. a O DW < OW n”n <— Slé6l "MO1}08 Sty} UT yons |e juepurjaq ay} Aed [eqs ‘ploaA aq 0} ‘sre[joq , yuepusjag ay} 0}0N ptinog sadjasino aspa;mouyoe ay ‘Ayunod ‘}ANOD JOladng ay} uy ‘¥NITONYOD HLYON 4O ALYLS Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—s5—,o4, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF or Mach le §-..County--GREETING: Dou are Hereby Commanded io a personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, af the next Court to be held for our said county at . =, AN Be eo et PS oe Bs. lige DW < on 2 — clé6l DN B. a P wo ° ~” ~” ~~ Ww ° n Sl6l N 5. = . hy = me i % ~” B. & wD fo} wa Bp } a S16 N 5. oo a> jee = =. ® < y North Carolina In the Superior Court, Iredell County May Term,1915. Hattie C. Smith, Plaintiff ~oaYiam COMPLAIN f. Boss Smith, Defendant. The plaintiff complains of the defendant and says: --First-- That on April 29th,1906, the plaintiff and the defend- ant married and lived together until the 16th day of, Potober,,. 1905, when the defendant without any just cause or rekon deserted and abandoned this plaintiff, and has not lived with her since said date or contribued anything whatever to her support, or that of the child begotton upon her, which child is now about eight years or more old, and in the care and control of the plaintiff in this action. --Second-- That as plaintiff is informed and believes the defendant unlawfully and improperly visited one Bell Dunlap and en- gaged in unlaw acts of adultery with her. “ --Third-- That the defendant since his separation from th plai tiff has repeatedly committed adultery with one Amete=Steein. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands judgment against the defendant, that the bonds of matrimony existing between them be dissolved, and that she have the absolute care and control of Harvey)@"dell, the son- of her marriage with the defendant in this action, and for such othér and further relief, a8 may be just and right.. iC: Attorney for the Plaintiff. —— ” 8. & w } a B fo} a. Sl6l TN B. E ol & x. oO < w Hattie C. Smith, being duly sworn, Says, that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of her information, knowledge and belief; that the said complaint is not mde out of levity, or by colusion be- tween herself and the defendant, her husband, and not for the mere purpose of being separated and freed from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the Complaint. The plaintiff further deposes and says that the facts set forth in the said complaint, as grounds for divorce have existed to her knowledge six months prior to the filing of this complaint; that she has been a resi- dent of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceding the filing of the Complaint. ff @<dasuctar Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 17th day of April,1915. NN BB. oo oF PP Se oF o 2 a ss. ln O Ww < of 3S sl6l Smith, Hattie vs. Smith, Boss (Bost) NM B. =z we © B Bp © 2 Sl6l N 3 P en B < ¥ Re. rl / antennae North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Hattie C. Smith ,Plaintirr . -<-Vs-- JUDGMEN SB, Boss Smith,Defendant. This cause coming on to he heard at this term of the Court before His Honor Thos.J. Shaw, Judge and a Jury, and being heard, and the jury heving found the issues as follows: L. Were the plaintiff ani defendant married &s alleged in the Company? Answer? Yes. 2e Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. 3. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and live in fornication and adultery with Minnie Ramsey, as alleged in the Complaint? Answérs Yes. It is ,therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court upon motion of L.C. Caldwell,Cowsel for plaintiff, that the bonds of mtrimony heretofore exist- ing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved, and the plaintiff be declared freed and discharged from all responsibility to the defendant, by reason Of the marriage aforesaid. 7) B. E wo 3 a B } 4 — S16! MN 3 P oy = i. a < r That she shnll have the absolute care and control of Harvey O'Dell Smith, the off spring of the said marriage. It is further adjudged that plaintiff shall pay the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. Judge PWesiding. oer TN zB. - P Ww ° nN n ~~ we ° WR cS Sl6l NM = - a rh = &. o < - Bill of Costs—Civil.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, 8c, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. ....County. Original Summons, or other original process, including all names therein Sere Every copy of same Bond, including Justification Appeal from Justices Appeal from Clerk to Judge Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . Order of Arrest Subpoena, cach name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian ....... Continuance Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment final in term time Judgment final before. Clerk Judgm€nt in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . .... . Docketing same Docketing ex parte Proceedings . Judgment oo Summons Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual a Ereeationand Sheriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00 Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when Jury impareled Referee's Allowance Constable Magistrate Plaintiff’s Witnesses CIVIL DOCKET. ——— BILL OF GOSTS--CIVIL, (As Fixed by’ thé Code. ) ~ Smith, Hattie vs. Smith, Boss (Bost) PUT “Yug ‘SA'S ‘f WU SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. AGAINST €l6l i? Pu ypiog peop Pees - (gexy) (oe) the defendant....above named, if e found within your d appear r before the Judge of wie ee ae ae the Court House ta Court, at a Court to be held for Ae Of: Lae Monday” the‘sdme’belitg” the ves TOAGL OF i which ‘willl be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the | days; of, said: Term; aud ‘let said: Defendant. will apply to the Court for the relief-demanded in the complaint. --- od fail'to ariswer to thejsaid gopsplaingt Within, that.time; thie: plaintift Hereof fail not, and of this summons make.due return. 1. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this PUT “yg 'SA “Sf ‘yg Cl6l S 2413 Jo AVE 0 33N0z) Jopadn PV ™ a[qeaiInjey 73/70 0d SNOWWAS f a ny 7 Ke gy NIC > \ -S 5 Fa F, rent Se errr eerie Aepo $1 aur ar0Jaq pequiosqns pue 0} nI0Mg “smoRNdexa mor ydutexe Ayr1ado1d pure saniiqety ‘s}q@p SIy aAoge pur 13A0 SI¥[]0P Pexpuny Om} Jo uns 34} qyOM st ay shes HIOMS SuIEq 61 ‘a Vy ess tnnenrnagenss ncdencerectepacusébsuWircrensahecundscetecc } oO hep pease ebobsidncciadubencocnwases sIq} ‘speas pue spuey ano SSOU}IM <A eth i Acs ha. cong “MO1}08 Sty} ar HNUArelg 324} Jo 1aa0001 Kew JUEpazeq 24} se soo qons |e HHULE[_ 243 3 ‘JaAasmoy ‘pIoA oq 0} ‘sre]10q Meee, | hen eP thee Cte ees eet Sen eee ebsnestovesneneedenegoaseseaiscencoestecsesecasenstdntovedueens J Oo mns 23 at ‘nor}08 Sit} ul AYUNOD ee *‘WNod s0ladng 2y3 uy { “¥NITOUYD HLYUON JO AL¥LS North Sarolina, In the Superior Court- Ji a Iredell County, July Term,1912. > Oe, ge J.S.Smith ~ vs, Complaint, oe Emma Smith. Bur “yg SA'S ‘f Wg €l6l The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleres and savs: a - That in the year 1900,o6he said Emma Smith intermarried with the % Plaintiff J.S.Smith according to law in Rowan county,N.C.,and thence : forgward from that time until the present time the marriage relation has existed between the parties to this action. 2. That and Whiter month of March, 1910 the said Emma Smith deserted the plaintiff and on that sat arate ince ADSR 29 adultry with different mefi/wnose es are unknown to°this pla LEE go eu 5. That the said plaintiff has not lived with the said Fmma Smith since h ae the time of her desertion and the commition of the acts of adultry above a mentioned and has in no way condoned the offense, j Wherefore the plaintiff prays that the court may grant an order divorcing @ the said J.S,Smith from his said wife Emma Smith xem and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing mg be absolutely dissolved,on account of tha acts of adultry as aforesaid,and that the cost be taxed by the clerk z= according to law. ¢ 2 \ x Nortn Carolina, Iredell County. J.S.Smith being sworn deposes and says: That the things set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge,information and i belief,except as to those things therein stated on information and 4 belief and as to those he believes it to be true- that he has filed the ; said complaint not out of levity hor collusion between the said husband and | wife-and not for the mere purpose of freeing and separating the said kushan | husband and wife,but in sincerety and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint-that the said facts Rave existed to the knowledge of the affiant for at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint and the said husband,J.S.Smith Yas been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the filing eee / Sworn to and subscribed before me this the ®4th day of June,1912. _Le VVeet 2 lp 3 ed PUN “Yyuusg ‘SA “S "f ‘YuuIg €l6l North Carolina, : In the Superior 6ourt- Iredell County. : July Term-1912, J.S.Smith : vs. : Affidavit. Emma Smith, John S,Smith,being duly sworn,deposes and says: That in the above entitled action now pending in the superior court of TIre@ell county, the sheriff of said county through his deputy,G.L.McKnight has returned the surmons issued to him in said action endorsed"defehdant not to be found in the county": that the defendant therein after due dbligence cannot be found within the State;that the said defendant is a proper party tof~said action, which action is for absolute divorce on the grounds of adultrvs; wherefore the said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the court *+hat service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell county,N.C. = i June 26,1912. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 26th day of JUne,1912. Lo Varbe SA North Carolina, : In the superior Court- Tredell County. : 369906¢h8)019 July Term-1912. J.S.Smith $ vs. :Notice. : Buy ‘Yuus ‘SA *§ ‘f ‘YUIg cl6l Emma Smith, 3: The defendant above named will take notice that an action entitled as above has been commenced in the superior court of Iredell county for divorce on account of adultry; and the said defendant ill further take notice that she is required to appear at the next term of the Superior t 3 court of said county xuxiikukemxkkkazux@x to be held on the 5th Monday before the lst Monday of September,the same being the 29th day of July, 1912,at the court house of said county in Statesville,N.C.,and answer or demur to the complaint in said action,or the plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief demanded in said compl 7 ; June 27,1912. ‘SA™S “f ‘Yuug North Carolina,: In the Superior Court- Iredell Co@unty.: July Term-1912. €l6l JI,.S,8math 3 VB. :Order of Publication, Emma Smith It appearing from the affidavit of J.S.Smith in this action,that Emma Smithithe defendant therein,is not to be foun® in Tredell county,and cannot’ ’ after due diligence be foun® in the State,and it further avvearing that the) — said defendant is a proper party to the said action which isfor divorce | absolute on the grounf of adultry: It ia therefore ordered,that notice of this action be published once a week tor four weeks in the Mooresville Enterprise,a newspaper published in Iredell county,setting forth the title of the action,the purpose of the same,and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of the superior court of Iredell county,to be held on the 5th Monday before the lst Monday in September,at the court house @n said county,and answer or de- mur to the complaint of the plaintiff ,or the relief therein demanded ' will be granted, 4 This the 27th day of June,1912 Smith, J. S. : Smith, Emm uu] “yg Sf Yuug cy i } BP f < = ee wie 7 arese Le r= . A. HAR’ . ZEB. V. TURLING Superior Court \ Attorney jw Pon : ; | a Put dt Mk tan Mor Rh Pd Hy. U or pltwa-~ "Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally uy “yg Sf ‘ymug NOTICE. _ Tees County, { Tone T erm, 1912. June 27, 1912." J. A. HARTNESs, | ~ Cierk Superior ZEB. V. TURLINGTON: ae | Attorney for Plaintiff. gH ‘Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally uu] “Yug S ‘f ‘Yyuwg NOTICE. | North Carolin In Superi. Iredell Counta’ { Wee ae rt, zs July erm, J. S. Smith ys, Emma_ Smith, ‘ The defendant above named will take Nty~ Hn notice that an action entitled as above ay .| Ras been commenced in the supine ‘| Court of Iredell county for divorce on account of adultery, and the said defend. ‘ ant will further i ; n -» and ; oaid’ actin the plemnisaepaaint in| — on, or a wi to the court for the volte demanded it Coe: Ah said complaint. = June 27, 1912, J, f SARTNESS, ‘ perior rt, Q ZEB. V. TURLINGTON ' On a Attorney for Plaintiff, ai frrttd® ey ays AMAT Me LM. yt A ‘Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally uuu] “yu : ; Thured : (F ft frttiakx” es f ‘Sf Yutg NOTICE. North Carolin: In Superior Cour Iredell County, t July erm, 1912" J. S. Smith ys, Emma Smith, The defendant above named will take é poses that an action entitled as above as been June 27,1912," J A. HARTNESS, Clerk Superior Court. { ZEB. V. TURLINGTON, a Attorney for Plaintiff. —_—- -eo~ 4. ak Map Ma Cee mere. A LA a Fuck Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally BU] Ys 'SA°S “f nUg Cl6l 5-15-’07-2M. Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF or Micdahnog perry County--GREETIN YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON Fie Ath Sr go ertain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein ‘ a. | Ae ae eu ‘YyyUg ‘SA'S “¢ Trg €l6l : + eee ticteacienternceeisiciec th Plaintiff... | i Against isvs 7 ae z nh 8 We . “ig Jt Reeve prt : 4s See 0h obs 7t shen fory : ie ade 5, 7 lage ag! tong El | a "TS a (fpcc | <a Smith, J. S. vs. Smith, Emma 1913 eT ae fe feck ORT Ee | @ mae BW Be. eee | eat a aed lent aoe a : “— a. oy ged Uk bor bor Cie her 2 fe , Smith, J. S. vs. Smith, Emma 1913 NN 3.8 > PP a ot E = =< " = i se n ye6l SUPERIOR COURT--SUMMONS In Accordance With Chapter 66 Public Laws 1927 ———______________—_______________________ EEE IREDELL COUNTY—In the Superior Court. Lilly Whitlock Smith AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF > ——Hurter W. smith THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Itedell To THE SHERIFF OF County.—_GREETING: Hunter We Smith You ArE Heresy COMMANDED TO SUMMONS Clerk of the Superior Court, for the County of Iredell, at the Court House in Statesville, not later than THIRTY DAYS from date of service of this summons, and answer the complaint, a copy of which is hereto attached (or which will be filed in the office of Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County within the time as set out in the at- tached order) and let the said defendant... take notice BEG DE ccc cctisteeaeiteoeenons . fail to answer the said complaint Herein fail not and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this..... 2 aay of January S perior Court, Tredell Co nty. erk NN 3.8 >t; = PF ao ce = << "a = =< ~” veo6l f ‘ rig popes " i ; OE, ESI IORI 7 Ree NR a i a hep eh i RA A as as poateoosy TTepeayr *D qyUuepue seg TTBqQuty °0 *M& teQuUnH ‘o Kiente, qyTwsg Jorpoyy qoy suomung GLAnOO AOIMAdAS TIHaAAUI UTS HOOTITUM ATITT TT8PeaT UT puNHPsT eq OF YON We, and each of us, acknowledge ourselves bound unto the Defendant... herein named in this action in the sum of two hundred dollars, to be void, however, if the wihin named Plaintiff... shall pay the defendant... all such costs as the Defendant... may recover of the Plaintiff... in this action. Witness our hand..... and seal... this the day of » 193 (SEau) (SEAL) (SEAL) maketh oath that he is a resident of County, North Carolina, and worth TWO HUNDRED dollars over and above all his liabilities and legal exemptions allowed by law. Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of Clerk Superior Court. / N 5. = Ly = = g = ve6l SA “AQ ATV] WptUg 2 Paap <f ee SUPERIOR COURT--SUMMONS In Accordance With Chapter 66 Public Laws 1927 IREDELL COUNTY—In the Superior Court. lilly Whitlock Smith AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF —— Hunter We Smith THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Izedell To THE SHERIFF OF County.—GREETING : Hunter ‘ye Smith You ARE HEerEBy COMMANDED TO SUMMONS. the defendant... above named, if ums. be found within your County, to be and appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court, for the County of Iredell, at the Court House in Statesville, not later than THIRTY DAYS from date of service of this summons, and answer the complaint, a copy of which is hereto attached (or ° which will be filed in the office of Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County within the time as set out in the at- tached order) and let the said defendant... take notice that ifn .. fail to answer the said complaint within the time required by law the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Herein fail not and of this summons make due “o Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. day of £ January i hella Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County. MN 5.3 oo = PP i i S = = “< a = = n ve6l day-of |... 193 4 paareg FOr a TTeQuty *O °O JorPPY Toy suouumng LAn00 YOLAdAS TIWAATaT qi codices ror EE po peareooyy SA “UT FaiS HSS TTF TTSpezy UF punNesT sq O04 ZO We, and each of us, acknowledge ourselves bound unto the Defendant... herein named in this action in the sum of two hundred dollars, to be void, however, if the within named Plaintiff... shall pay the defendant... all such costs as the Defendant... may recover of the Plaintiff... in this action. Witness. our hand..... and seal... this the day of. 193 ? (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) maketh oath that he is a resident of County, North Carolina, and worth TWO HUNDRED dollars over and above all his liabilities and legal exemptions allowed by law. Sworn to and subscribed before me this.name Clerk Superior Court. doo NN 5.8 > = PS oo ES BS S< = ”n ve6l North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Lilly “hitlock Smith VSe COMPLAINT Hunter W. Smith The plaintiff complaining of the defendant, alleges and says: lst. That on or about the 2lst day of December ’ 1919,in Union Grove,N.C.,Iredell County, plaintiff and defendant intermarried, and marriage relation has existed agtall times since said date, and the plaintiff and defendant are now husband and wife. end. That on or about the 14th day of August 1928,the defepdant abéndoned the plaintiff and has lived separate and apart fro at all times since said date for a period greater than two years. That said separation and abandonment was through no fault of the plaintiff. - ? ord. That the glaintiff has been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for a period of more than two years immediately preceeding the institution or commencement of this action. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgement that she be gzanted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with the defendant, and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper. ie a ep 5.2. BS all wp Fc & Be 5 < m vi veol North Carolina, Iredell County. Lilly Whitlock Smith after bei that the facts set forth in the foregoi the best affiants, knowledge, is not made out of levity or collusion between husband, but in s rety and truth for the cause and for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other; that affiant has beeen a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the beginning of this action or the filing of this complaint. ng duly sworn, says; ng complaint are true to the said complaint the plaintiff and her Athy svbetlecl Devices Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 2nd day of January, 1934. i perk of. Seal SE LAPP a tye AOL ef lEcsz v af x / f oa —— WY T vf YX en Dw 5.8 >; & 5 mak == a S< =< n vt6l é North Carolina, In the Superdor Court. Iredell County. Lilly Whitlock Smith VSe Affidavit Hunter W. Smith Lilly Whitlock Smith, plaintiff in the above entitled action makes oath that she has a good cause of action against Hunter W. Smith,defendant for absolute divorce: That the defendant, after due diligence on the part of the officer of the law, cannot be found within the State of North Carolinas that he was a resident of the State of North Carolina but has departe refrom: that summons in this action was duly dssued on the day of January, 1954, by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and returned by the Sheriff:"Not to be found in Iredell County". Ditts with ae Affiant Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 2nd day of January,1934. Leo A FOL bp (Df. Lif Ve ZED Da 7 a f A<KE oe o / (I nn 3.8 - =F PS aot eS BS 5 < i n ve6l North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Lilly Whitlock Smith VSe ORDER OF PUBLICATION Hunter We. Smith It appearing from the affidavit of Lilly Whitlock Smith, plaintiff in this action, that the plaintiff has a good cause of action against the defendant for absolute divorce, and that the defendant after due diligence, cannot be found in the State; it further appearimg that the @#aintiff sues for an absolute divorce from said defendant on the grounds<ef two years separation and that this is one of the causes of which service of summons may be made by publication as provided by section 484 Consolidated Statutes 1919 of North Carolina with amendments thereto, for publication in divorce suits. It is therefore ordered that summons be served on Hunter W. Smith by publication, and to that end notice by this action be published once a week for four consecutive weeks in the States- ville Daily, a newspaper published in Iredell County, setting forth title of this action, the purpose of the same and requiring the defendant to appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County,in the Court House in Statesville,N.C., on the day of Fiehig ny 195% and answer to the complaint, a copy of which is now on filt in said Court House within the time required by law, or the plaintiff will apply for relief demanded in the compladnt. This the eee «fa isl . uperior Court fs SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C nol. Gee. In the Superior Court. "S$ “N Yutg "SA 9]ION’T “YU SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Cl6l the defendant Bic: Court, at a Court to be held gtk County of al Monday after the ..19Mf., and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three they fail to answer to the said complaint days of said Term, and let said Defendant within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this Cl ‘SN ‘Wnts ‘SA Q!on'y “WyTUg Cl6l ~ paatsoay | 431734 HO SNOWWAS -AF61 HL VETO” a[quainjey | ee “SK Jo vn0g rolzadng eq} jo SATION Y Sag SI} 9M a10Jaq paqiiosqns pue 0} WIOMS ‘smo}noaxe wor ydurexe Ay1ado1d pue sarjtiqety ‘syqap sty aaoqe pue 1940 SIB[[Op PpeJpuny OM} Jo UNS 94} qI0M st oy Shes UIOMS BuIBq™~ (‘{eag) Se tices beta ticle sincpaeee dace ieaetnvccaliivenjcas saad SIq} ‘s[vas pue spuey ino ssouzI "HOI}OB SI} Ut HIUle[_q 24} JO saao0va1 Avut~~yuepuajaq ay} se 4so9 yons |e IUBpPUajay 9y3 Awd [pws tect cette scence HUUIL]g 94} jt ‘IAaMoy ‘pIOA 3q 0} ‘sre][oq7 juepusjaq 34} 0}UN punog sadjasino asp; Mouyoe ay LSNIVOV f ‘Aynnod ‘yanod Jousdng ay,uy << { ‘¥NITONVO HLNON JO SAL¥LS ‘S "N ‘Uiwsg ‘SA 9[ION’T ‘YUIGg Cl6l North Carolina, In the Superior Court, { Iredell County, Before the Judge, Lucile Smith COMPLAINT, The plaintiff complains and says: First That on the 28th. day of June, 1911 plaintiff and defendant intermarried and since said date have been and now are man and wife, second That on the 30th, day of June, 1911 the defendant creg@ily, maliciously, and with out cause turned the plaintiff out of doors and refused to permit her to live vith him, or to provide her with means of support; that he applied vile epithets to her, calling her a common strumpet; that he premitted his children to abuse and vilify her in his presence, and finally drove her away from his home, Third That plaintiff has requested defendant to provide her with means of support, and to permit her to return 1d there to care for her as his wife all has refused and still refuses to do, and said defendant has failed and refused to provide this plaintiff ~~ with the necessary subsist&nce according to his means and eondition in life, Fourth That since they were married, and as plaintiff is informed and believes, the defendant has made over his stock of goods, wares, and merchandise worth about 92000,00 #2 ’ to his children and without any consideration for the purpose of defrauding his wife out of her marital Nn a 5 rights, FE : 2c WHEREFORE plaintiff demands judgment against the ~” &, ie 4 defendant, and prays the Court to allow and secure to < “” a her from the income and estate of the defendant a OO reasonable subsistence, Plaintiff alleges and shows ’ to the Court that said plaintiff has no seperate estate of her own, Attorneys for Popes tes Lucile Smith, the above named plaintiff, after being duly sworn, says that the foregoing complaint is true of her own knowledge, except as to those matters and things stated théarein upon information and belief, and as to those she believes it to be true, / \ > on A, va A a. sworn to and subscribed before me this the2 /of October, 1911, NORTH CAROLINA, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY. IT, J» P. MeMichael,Register of Deeds, in and for the County ‘S ‘N Yitws “SA 9[on’T “Yyg of Rockingham, State of North Carolina, do hereby certify, that cl6l the Tax Book for said County for the year 1911 shows the following property, listed by N.S.Smith and valued as setout below: L Town Lot $750.00 1 Town Lot 800.00 1 Town Lot 50.00 Libraries and sciantific instruments 5.00 Goods, Wares and Merchandise mate GO Total $5605.00 This October the 28, 1911 9.2) Jap bon bask - Register of Deeds for Rockingham County CHAS. O. MCMICHAEL ATTORNEY ANB COUNSELLOR AT LAW MADISON, N. C. Oct e 30 ’ 1912s Lewis & Lewis, gtatesville, N.C. ‘SN ‘Ys ‘SA p}on’y YG Gentlemen:< Cl6l I herewith enclose you a certificate, of J. P. McMichasl Register of Deeds, showing the property that N. S. Smith list taxation and the value placed thereon by the accessor, This shows $2605.00, and I would say that he is easily worth $3500., as I am satisfied that the property is not ascessed over 60%. It is all untrue about Smith, being County Superintendent of Public .nstructions. He was such officer about 20 years ago, but has not been since. This is the only way that I knew how to arrive at what property he posessed. I hope this will reach you in time to be used as you desired. Yours truly, , CNH Smith, N. S. ‘SN ‘Ymug ‘SA o[ION'] WyTUIG Cl6l ‘SN ‘Wig "SA afton’y WTUIg cl6l esos teeeaencsiee, f é : 8 i i ‘ LEWIS & LEWIS ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ; ee N.C. ‘SN ‘Ymug "SA o]Ion'] ‘yyUg STATESVILLE, N. C.__30 18, 1911 191 __ Cl6l Mr, N.S, Smith, Stoneville, N.C. Dear sift This letter is written to you for the purpose of notifying you that Judge Long has set Tuesday November the 28th, 1911 for the date of the trial in the case of Yrs, Lucile Smith Vs. NG S, Smith, Thgplace of the trial is Statesville, N, C. I wrote to your lawyer, Mr. Dalton, of Reidesville, N, CC, today notifying him of the date of the trial. Yours truly, LEWIS-& LEWIS ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW Se ee ILLB, N.C. ‘S“N ‘Yitug ‘SA OTION'T “YWUg STATESVILLE, N. C. cl6l Reidesville, N.C. Dear sir:e In complyance with our agreement in the case of Nrs, Lucile Smith Vs. N.S. Smith , this letter is written to inform you that Judge Long has set Tuesday November, the 28th., 1911 for the day of the trial, I hope that this date will be satisfactory to you, as it is the only time that Judge Long could coveniently hear it, I will also write to Mr, N. S. Smith inforning him of the date of the trial, Yours very truly, Copy of a letter sent to Mr, Dalton, atty. for N.S. Smith, Cl6l 'S "N ‘Qitug "SA ofION'y “WTS NORTH CAROLINA, ) ; IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IRIDEL county. } BEFORE THE JUDGE. Lucile Smith, VS.- : AT 8 WB Re. N.S. Gmith. | A The defendant answering the complaint of the plaintiff alleges: I. Theidefendant admits that he was married to the plaintiff on or about the 38th day of June, 1911. TI. That paragraph second of the plaintiff's complaint is untrue and is denied, Ker This defendant denies he,sat any time turned the an plaintiff out of doors, but avers the faots to be as fobtows: That within a few days after the marriage of the i plaintiff and defendant, that the plaintiff freely, voluntarily and without cause or fault om ‘the part of the defendant \ abandoned the defendant, and want to the City of Winston, North Carolinas and as défendant is informed and believes, lived a lewd and laschievious life, engaging in sexual enter- course at divers times with divers persons whose names are unknown to this defendant. That, at the time the plaintiff left the defendant, this defendant aid not know that she” meant or intended to abandon him, at itd that she wanted to go down to Winston for a few days, and this defendant | gave her money with which to pay her expenses etc. on said trip, that after her leaving this defendant, upon her request, | the defendant furnished her with money at different times, ! and continued to do so until he was informed that she was | 2 : : x s } living an immoral and laschi¢vious life. i @ t ‘SN ‘Wig ‘SA 9f!ON’y “WpTUAg Cl6l | awn, at, the tae) So c fy f < <th- wm AAD yy eg A, a al ; =o 2 eclene_) Conug tha Tn. a . he on 4a ey at ws f , x pee haf . I 2H ¢ The defendant admité-4 ‘the plaintiff has A requested him, by letter, to provide her with means of < Support, but denies that she has ever expressed a desire to live with the defendant since her abamdonment of the defendant, as hereinbefore alleged; but on the other hand has expressed herself as not desiring to live with the defendant, and expressed herself as willing that a divorce be in granted to them, saying in substance, that/this marriage with the defendant , her hands were tied, but that if released from the defendant, she would be free to remarry and could remarry again. Iv. That paragraph four of the plaintiff's complaint is denied. F oF WiEREPORE, The defendant having fully answered prays judgment that the plaintiff's case be, dismissed, that the defendant go without day, and shch other and further relief as he may be entitled to. Chz- Sra) g Khel Tx) Oe Attorneys for ietenten "ORTH CAROLI NA, 2, ROCK INGHAM: COUNTY. N.S. Smith being duly Sworn says, that the facts set-forth in the foregoing answer are true cf his own knowledge, except as to the matters stated on information and veliev, and as to those matters he believes it to be true. Subscribed and sworn to a” we® me this*y.day of. SL Notary Public. 6A Spa a PER sisi wit evened a a q ; ; a. 9 : Smith, Lucile vs. Smith, N. S. 1913 ‘SN ‘Wig ‘SA ap1on’y “yang Cl6l ‘- _ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, , §/ BEPORE J UDGE, B.F.LONG, IREDELL CouNTY. AT CHAMBERS . Lucile Smith, Ae Vs N.S.Smith. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. The defendant,through his counsel,Johnston,Ivie & Dalton, enters a special appearance in the above entitled cause and moves to dismiss the same for the following reasons: & First: That the Superior Court of Iredell County had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action or of the parties thereto,to hear or te render judgment therein, because this action was not brovght by the plaintiff in the County where he (the defendant ) resides as required by section #1567 of Pells' Revisal of N.C. Second: That this Court (at Chambers) has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action cr cf the parties theretc, because his Honcr,Judge B,F.Long,is not now the Judge presiding in the 10th. Judicial District cf N.C,where this action was begun, but is the resident judge cf said Judicial District. (TIO... . ~ Atty's. for Defendant. Smith, Lucile vs. Smith, N. S. 1913 Smith, Lucile vs. Smith, N. S. 1913 Smith, Lucile vs. Smith, N. S. 1913 dee ig 9 yyy g S beyedtre~ i tleflr aud afeferls Lo He Scftvcece/kawinhy.. Utes fh affpcah vacrh - Hearty Lays eltrsnd/ | fer. bauk Zo tet“ Crac/ —1_Ofefie) ore | ‘S'N ‘Uuug "SA o]1On’] WTUAg cl6l "SA a]1on] TUG ~” B. = x wn © oO a Ec een ace ae teagal ea 2s Ctu>- A fuuhach iefhtd ls hie onrraling ofthe a ca bs gee La ae Dg é Seep ‘SN ‘WuIUIg ‘SA 9]}on’] YT UNDERTAKING ON APPEAL. cl6l STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL COUNTY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. LUCILE SMITH ae ; N..8. SMITH. Whereas, the above named defendant has appealed to the Supreme Court ef North Carolina, from an order made by his Honer, G: 8. Fergusen in the above entitled cause in the Superior Court of Tredell County in favor of said plaintiff and against said defendant: a ieee we, the said N. S. Smith and ( di x: ) undertake in the sume ef $25.00, that said appellant will pay all costs which may be awarded against him on said appeal. Witness our seale this the /Z) day of wor fis hihsoarl ae t “ch dees > being duly sworn says: That he is worth the sum ef $50.00 over and above his liabilities April, 1913. and exemptions allewed by law. (Seaz}- (Remi —— C Subscribed and sworn te before me this the // day of April, 1912. Sir fe : Cte __ Notary Public. My Commission expires July 12, 1912 My commission expires ‘SN Utug ‘SA ayton’y ‘Yyrug cl6l HA Com {esyou exbzz08 ee emai aietnatitiaediem 3 : MOSTIA Eapyyee oy ybi7] Jeys° EMPOCLIPET IHG OMCEY FO PElORe we spye spe ate serena igaininat eet I A i euq exewhypyoue wyyoueq pA sear MOLEP f/¢ OB OL §20°0O CASK ONG spoas Pre TISPT ITE TSe SO RRR: eed aie eee “ peyw® gnjd vacity ewe; ipss pe Mleveer ONL Berye spre spe awEgeq veivyrey pw or esq fPS¢ B857QG Shbheyyeus wyyy bel syy ooRze 4» Top ) MEGELeeKe It ppe eome of yom” spezetore® as® gpe evig y* ve Owl ep sygevess ufA JM Laaok of evrg byeirey1y svg wferves cones jv spe enbextor Cones Of 20U JY pgpe KOLFP QVLOTIRE> TLrow SPOAS UsKGy JeLlergerg pee ‘SN Yug "SA a[IOn’y ‘yg Cl6l ‘SN ‘Yug ‘SA o!ON'y “WTUTg cl6l 1 CAROLINA, ) SUPERIOR COURT. ) ROCKINGHAM COUNTY. ) N.S.Smith JUNE TERM, 1912. Vs. JUDGMENT? HUCLITS Smith. This VLLS¢ ming on to 2a, and the following issues having been st.) Were the plaintiff and complaint ' + a Ae the defendant Tuci he complaint’ - rd before his Honor and a jury answered by the jury in favor defendant married resident of North Carolina fox cf this action and the Pils Smith, commit ac ie Wes oe or @ one SUMMONS 5 bounds of matrimony a dissolved and th: a ns ae e taxed by A. Danie Judge Presi SN ‘Yrs ‘SA apton’y Yptug Cl6l STATE OF NORTE C/ROLINA, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY. tT, JAS. 2. in and for th: County and State aforesaid, foregoing to be Suit or FE via weud & our 1 ? now on ender aie eoresr print allan SMITH, Clerk of the hereby certify the and official seal , this 20th., day of tol J Clerk Superior Court. Nerth Carolina In the Superier Ceurt. Iredell County January Term ,1913. ‘SN ‘WmUIg ‘SA ofton’] “YG Lucile Smith Cl6l vs Judgment. N. S. Smith This cause ceming en te be heard at the January Term, 1913, ef the Superier Ceurt of Iredell County, before Hie Hener, Nxxitx F. VW. Whedbee, Judge Presiding, and it appeering te the ceurt that the defendant since the com- mencement of this action has ebtained an abselute divorce frem the plaintiff, and it appeering further thet the sumzurary interlocutory judgment heretofore rendered in this cause was appealed from by the defendant, and thet said appeal was not presecuted in the Supreme ceurt by agreement of all parties; It is therefore considered and edjudged by the Court that the said interlocutsyy judgment by consent ef all parties shall be cancelled from the records, and that this judgment shall be considered a full satisfaction and release of said guste interlocutory judgment on the part of the said Lucile Smith to the said N. S. Smith; It is coneidered and adjudged further by the court that this action be and the same is dé#dmtée¢d hereby dis- (\ + \ missed. PY ON LAY p wo q Se Le UY 6 ‘ Judge Presiding. A ; \ By censent; 7 Attys for Plaintiir. Atty fer Defendant. Smith, Lucile vs. Smith, N. S. 1913 Bill of Coste—Civil.—Printed and for sale b Vie dy, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. ones ace ETC OPN al] DE ee Dotket. MEM nek ee MES Mee ee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT mone, inclining Judificetio.............. 68.1.8 Bore Bo A to Judge. A>. . = = es Acar aes County. Order for enlarging time of pleading. ........«. ; c Menke Zz bo PET ee ee ee Sone n 3. TRCN RNIN EN oc eee. 50 Cs a Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . roof | ff __ me * SE ee oe 1,00 \o eae oes munpOre, OMEN MME ee ABs. | eGo aoe Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. . .... . 1.00 ea Aone MRE fe Se ee ra ee oe eae “sof - pani ve di Caveat to a Will, Y sstoy and , : “a sn es SO Re yj ’ Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate... ..... asf) i}. ge ot cass ocucsasnpant er ercveeeieer sh stom blag es ssesa clined toasuiy aay ee 25 ee Motion, Entry and Record of Wry OOO. 25 bk Notice . . epee og ee hg aN 25 Notice, for each name over one in same paper. . . . . . OR eo. : ae ee fe ae eae MDRMEMUM INET. re ee gy pee ae Shans J ustification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided. . 50 7 9§ a pocament Rustintermtime, - . 0.8. 2 1.00 Judgment final before,Clerk. . 2... .....2.... -50]] f Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . ..... .50]] “ Docketing OE ee ey Fae wis ei ees bee ce 25 ]}- / ) - 25 a --- SNA OMG 25 3 a eee -1o}} Re -I0 Pac: OR MOURN ks et ea eee «OMe che om c. Pamnees OF ent a ee, ye: On, Moe) GMS ™hiLseewtron ofa eri OO es yk a .50 Appeal to Sincene Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00 Transcript to Supreme Court... . copy sheets, each. . OR a: 2 VA County Tax, when Juryimpareled........... 3.00]]_ --~ Hes i a an JET Vp: iS J 4 Sheriff. . £ Bee Wes — SRI. 056 rele Se EE a ge Bde SU ae a ga Ea caine on Magistrate... . ... x PeeWee ee WIN ra ele wi cpa te aes too ees cree sts Wee ecm the ae ali ys gig gt apig tp es et tee bani ¥ “ CE PIE SURI ining engange epg fo a oe is “ SD ee | DPRRMIMARIEL O WUSEMONORE Se a ek ee ee ao aes Sa cEC ames ‘ i - PAIRS TE RG OH) | OL RE Dawe e oh aaa i Re ae Clerk. j No CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--GIVIL, = | Rey Term, 191 ..... TS s MEN s S Y GQ Oates eg Smith, Lucile vs. Smith, N. S. 1913 wes “YWWS ‘SA SIUUTY “UWS 6l6l 22 SSC DI OMAR am eR 0 RIA i RE lt A A aL ae SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. © County—In the Superior Court. the defendant._ above named, if_ Abe found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our, Superior § Court, at a Court to x held for the County of at the Court House in on the_Z/.%. Monday after the.Z™___ Monday of the same being ye Ray of EEA Emacs 191Z.__, and, answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior C three days of said Term, and let said Defendant complaint within that time, the plaintiff plaint. ourt for said County, within the first take notice i Mc ey fail to answer to the said will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return, Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this_7 5 day of ojUN pUNog SeAjesino 9spe_MouyoV oA puwby [S VNIIONVO HLUYON JO ALVLS Od ee a tee ‘suoI}Ndexe Wor ydwiexe Ajzedoad pue serjt{Iqet] ‘s}qep sty eAoqe pue az2A0 “WOTjow SITY} UL ~-~~~-YryUIe[_ ay} JO taaoved Avul ~-----juUBpuezoq ay} se 4s00 "pn0Q sor1sadng ay} uy Ch RMERRE oor urrei yc yesear com ne Sage eee ae sap: en OU d10Foq Posqiiosqus puw 0} UIOMYG ToTC RE“ IN Te Langa ieee eae Aep-~ ~~ 777" sty ‘s[vos pues spuvy ino ssouqt Ay “pIoA aq OF WRU ce ee a re ee ee wns 94} Ul ‘aorjoR SI} UI ~~~~juepuesjeq 9y} yous [[@ ~~--~-juepuszoq oy} Aed OM en Dg ae a ee eo oq} jt ‘TOAQMOY ' ' ! ' ' ! ' 1 ' ' ' t ' i ‘ ' ' ' ' ' 1 1 ! ' ! ! ! | ' ! i ! i i 1 | i ! a © ee 5 oR Z o 8 5 m = “4 R = @ ya = ° S ct = + a @ na = B ° a _ = ° Ss Ss iY eS © 2 a S — > s n VR or nn tee area (Tag ea ees seen ence aiae Smith, Minnie vs. Smith, Sam 1919 wes “YS ‘SA SIUUTYY “YW 6l6l North Carolina, In the Superior Court- Iredell County. May Term-1919. Minnie Smith vs. Complaint. Sam Smith. The plaintiff complains and alleges: 1. That she is a resident of Iredgell county and has been for the past sixteen years . 3% at the plaintiff intermarried with Sam Smith on February 4, 1915 and that the marriage relation has existed up to this time. 3. That the said Smith abandoned his said wife during the month of April,1916 and has not lived nor co-habited with her since that time and is still living separate and apart from the said plaintiff. 4.That during the month of March,1918 the said Sam Smith did commit adultry with some woman,whose name is unknown,in a house of {11 fame in the Tow of Spyncer 507 g;shat this act of adultry was known to this plaintiff more than x months prior to tne filing of the suit in this case and that this plaintiff has not lived with the said defendant nor in any way condoned the offense, Wherefore the said plaintiff prays that she may be granted an absolute divorce from the said Sam Smith because of the act of adultry above set forth and for sueh other and furtHer relief as she may be entitled to by law. ~— c Olek le J) Attorney *or Plaintit®. North Carolina, Iredell County. Minnie Smith,the plaintiff in the above entitled cause being duly sworn deposes and says that the, facts set forth in the above complaint are true to the best of her knowledge,information and belief,amd that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between husband and wife and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from cach other,but in sincerety and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint, that she nas been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years prior to the filing of this complaint and that the facts set forth in the said complaint have been kno™m to her more than six mohbhs prior to the filing of the complaint. Wadd: ae toatt. Sworn to and subberibed to before me this the 18th day of April, 1919. aP ‘ ( A UL ZZé 22127 ap. iecnaanicnn, Notary Public. [lis Jt bs /92) Smith, Minnie vs. Smith, Sam 1919 Yn B. E. r & 3 eZ) Z. F Z B. o é 6161 North Carolina, In the Superior Court} Iredell County, Bay Term-1919, Minnie Smith vs. Notice of Publicafion of Summons. Sam Smith : The defendant above named will take notice that an action entitled as above has been commemeced tn the superior court of lredell County for divorce absolutely on tne grounds o* adultrv: and the said defendant will further take notice tnat he is required to appear at the next term of the Superior of said county to be held on the llth Monday after the First Monday of March,1919,the same being the 19th day of may,1919,at the court house of said county in Statesville,N.C.,and answer or demur to the comnlaint in said action,or the vlaintiff will anply to¥ the court for the relief demanded in said complaint. of the Superior Court. This the 19th day of March,1919. nn 2. B. Be eS 35 E. S 6161 North Carolina, : In the Superior Court- Iredell County. : May Term. Minnie Smith : vs. Affidavit. Sam Smith, 3 Minnie Smith,being duly isworn deposes and says that in the above entitled action now pending in the superior court of Iredell County the sheriff of said county has returned the summons issued to him marked and endorsed "Defendant not to he found in Tredell County": that the defendant therein cannot after due diligence be found in the State of North Carolina; that said defendant is a proper party to said action for divorce and that gaid divorce proceedings is brought against the defendant on the grounds of adultry; wherefore the said plaintiff? prays that an order be made by the court that service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some nevspaper published in Ifedell County,N.Cc. Mises South, Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 19th day of March,1919. (5 duel: EXfritr FrkS PLY Nn B. E r WD 3) 3 ND 3. = = B o < y 6161 North Carolina, : Im-@h@lsaperior Court- Iredell County. : May Term-191°. Minnie Smith : vB, Order of Publication. Sam Smith, 3 It appearing from the affidavit of minnie Smith in this action, that Sam Smith,the defendant therein,is not to be found in Iredell county,and cannot after due diligence be found in the State of North Carolina,and it further appearing that the said action is for divorce on the grounds of adultrys It is therefore ordered,that notice of this action be published once a week for four weeks in the Mooresville Enterprise,a newspaper published in fFredell county,setting forth the title of the action,the purrose of the same,and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of tne Superior eourt of Tredell sountyv,to be held on the 11th monday after the first Monday of March,1919, the same being the 19th day of Mav,1919,at the court house in said county,and amswer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff or the relief demanded therein will be rranted, WMA te2 Ci Ole o. This the 19th day of March,1919. Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale Dy prauy, .-. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NN 2. B. Be £ = 35 e. a 6l6l etree gc hb ee Plaintiff. Against ND g 5 nse BB S. B 6l6l eo ‘the Court for: ti 7 i a A: | This the 19th day of Ni ules “YIWS ‘SA STUUT “NWS 6161 1 byt L iff A pe SG Sh Se » Ye fie A te A ditarees yh fy ij i os Ep ubeihan Ann. ; v i LR 4 Dome, _ptoomeninn) Ps . . ’ \ é ae é é a i a A AN f weg “YS ‘SA StU “UWS 616! Smith, Minnie vs. Smith,Sam 1919 6161 wes “YWWS ‘SA QIU] “UWS Smith, Minnie vs. Smith, Sam 1919 wes “YWWS 6161 “ys ‘SA STUUTI] Bill of Conte —-Civ-Printed and for sale a ty Bendy Printing Co., Statesville, N. C. | Original Summons, « or oF other original process, including all names therein No. Rpeeeet es ae Every copy of same IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. | |r behta Wd : Src County. og ag8 a . Onder for enlarging time of pleading : Interlocutory Orders. Uy tg ee io Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond and Justificatiun. . . . Order of Arrest sig each name Agajnst Lowe Losth Ae aesiaine, Solicitor of Removal of Guardian c § Issuing Cothmission: Os ala een 8 ore? eens | Affidavit, including Joist and Certificate Seal. | . " olginitet Against Me fe onl 2 tmpanetng Jory i "Hl Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided. Judgment final in term/time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow's Year's Support Docketing same Docketing 4x parte Proceedengs Ke Judgement " Summons Indexing Jodguient Filing Papers. . . Rostage,-actral . Transcript of Judgement. herriff's Return -50 Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal .. 2.00 Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when jury impaneled Referee’s Allowance AE Magistrate Plaintiff2s_Wi “6 “6 “6 “6 “ ie ae CIVIL DOCKET. = BILL OF COS#S-~-CIVIL. 3 (As Fixed by the Code.) Term, 191 + Smith, Minnie vs. Smith, Sam 1919 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C 6-9-’09-1M, Yrideee County. In the Superior Court SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. es 1 Se the Cot rt . Hous i use in the sathe being the": 24, day OF20/0!. 9 a “ccc vole Peii@tanswer the complaint, a copy of which’-will! be deposited in the office of t Clerk of the Stiperior Coiift’ for ‘said Coanity;’within the firstthree days; ofisaid: Term, and let said) Defendantsii..2,take notice it OAt:they fail to answer to the said’ cosplaint .-Will apply to the Court for the relief. demanded in the complaint Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due; return. YL Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this Ho Withip, that time, the plaintiff... : OK AA applet Nat Ae ‘ -Rounty. aissog “Uys ‘SA “AO UWS cl6l 23Q 1n0D s0j1adng eq} Jo ye a[qeuinjzey Fh 431734 HOd SNOWWNS “AdNIONY SHAY AN at 761 ‘a0, ~ SIY} SUI a10J9q poqiIosqns pue 07 LIOMS ‘suoHNdexa mor ydutexea Aj1ado3d pue saniiqet] ‘s}qap sty aaoqe pue 1aA0 quepurjeq 24} 0J0N punog saajasino aspe;mouyor ay ‘NOD Joedng 94} Uy \ “¥NITOUYS HLUON AO AL¥LS aissog “YyWIS ‘SA “MO UWS cl6l s1ssog “YMG ‘SA “AA CO “UUs cl6l North Carolina, In the Superior Court Iredell County July Term 1912, O.W.Smith vs Bessie Smith. The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges: First. That the palintiff and defendant we e married on or about the 24th, day of August 10 03, in said County and State and since then have been and are now hiisband and wife. Second. That on the 3lst, day of May 1910 the defendant disregarding the solemnity of the marriage vows, wilfully and without cause deserted and abandoned the plaintiff and has since then and still continues to so wilfully and without cause desert and abandon the said plaintiff and to live sepegzate and apart from him, without sufficient cause or reason, Third, That after the defendant wilfully and wibhout cause deser- ted and abandoned the said plaintiff as above stated she lived in lary fares: adultry with one Della Lowe and other persons unknown to the plaintiff. Fourth. That the plaintiff has not received the defendant in conjugal embraces since she abandoned him as above stated. Fifth. That the plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of the State of NorthcCarolina for more than two years next preceeding the institution of this action. Sixth. That the facte herein contained and set forth as a com- plaint, have existcd to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months next preceeding the institution of this action, wherefore, the plaintiff demands judgment against the defendant, that NN BB. > PP wo o ° “ = me: < wv cl6l he be granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with the defendant. Y- O.W.Smith, being duly sworn deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing comphaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief and that the complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and the defendant and not for the purpose of heing freed and seperated from aach other, put, in sincerety and truth for the causes named in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint ap grounds for divorce have existed to his knowledge at least six months prioe to the filing of this complaint and that the plaintiff has been a resident of this State for more than two years next preceeding the filing of the complaint. Dit Liege: Sworn to ané subscribed before me this the AV day of Junel912. Coma YUrehs ¢ gout Deity hk sale Oe ae [ Smith, O. W. vs. Smith, Bessie 1912 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C 12 Cebety.-- In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. To the Sheriff of he , A County--GREETING: Dou are hereby Commanded to’ Sutnmon. ee ee r oud oh the defendant ....above named, i £OF: ‘sleurwes th the complaint, a copy of ourt for ‘said County Within the firstithree daysiofisaigs Derm; and ‘let said: Defendants::.-,take ‘notice if Me7Cg “fail to-answer to the said’ soyaphaint Within that;time; the-plaintiff.:.:.owill apply to the Court: for-the relief dewganded-in the-complaint, —--—---—---- Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. j Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this > Pe \Cler sIssog “YWUWIS ‘SA “AAO WNUS clél 43\394 801 SNOWANS ® SI} BUI aIOJaq peqtiosqns pu 0} nIOMS *suOI}Ndexa wWoIy ydutaxa Aj1adoid pue saij1{1qeI] ‘s}qap sy 2Aoge pue 13A0 WEpusjeq 9} SB 3SOD qons |e HHALEL_ 24} Jf ‘aAaMoy ‘pIoA aq 0} ‘sze]]0q POO Pencevesececenegccersccnses seg edsoesecgesemeccoscctanceconsnssssneeseecccoeseneccoessces. } 0 mns 243 ut ‘noo8 Sit} ur quepuajeq 243 0jUN pUNog saajasino aBpe;MouyIE 39, *yunod JoWedng 243 Uy ' “¥NINONVYO HLYUON JO AL¥LS sissog “YWUIS ‘SA “AAO “UWS cl6l Served by Publication. North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. July Term, 1912, 0.W.Smith, Bessie Smith. \ & o.W.Smith, veitig ‘Gary sworn deposes and cays; thet in the above entittled action now pending in the Superior Court. of Iredell County, the Sheriff of said County has returned the summons issued to him, endorsed" Bessie Smith is not to be found in said County"; that the defendant after due dilligence cannot be found in the State; that a cause of action exists against the defentant in favor of ‘the plaintiff as follows: That the plaintiff and defendant were married om or about the 24th, day of Aug. 1903; that some time in 1910 the said defendant willfully and without cause abandoned the plaintiff; that after said abandonment the defendant lived in adultry with and other persons unknown to the plaintiff, wherefore the said plaintiff | prays that an order be granted by the Court that service of summons be made on the said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County, N.C.. This the 2st, day of July 1912. OW Soaith. Sworn and subscribed to before me this the lst, day of July 1912 9 ° 1) pe f] V erk 0 ourt. aissag “YS ‘SA “MO URW cl6l Sealowile, N $v 3 MNF A Warns. | 0. 0. W. Smith’ vs. Bessie Smith. t "ae a=t;'HELANDMARK . eo i R.R CLARK, Proprietor A FED TWICE-A-WeEEK: TUESDAY AND FRID) SEES ily appeated before me. Pies J) a (4d) ‘ = Who, bei giul Won, says that he CNET At | b uly, 1912, at the im) paid) county, ani anewer or demur to the complaint of the plaintifg. J. A. HARTNESS, tO and SUDSCI Mee beio Clerk of the SuperionCourt. W. A. Bristol, Ajttiy. . July 6. 1912. 0 sto c 3 > = — ; 2 oO ” ny we ao TN 3 = Pe co ~~ = < cl6l Slalewile, WE v5 MCG A Wario, CO.) Q ORDER OF PUBLICATION. = North Carolina, | Im the Superior Iredell County. | Court it 0, W. Smith vs. Bessie Smith. j ; i It appearing from the affidavit of . ' ok 0. W. Smith in this action that oo Bessie Smith,the : ha defendant therein, Nand onreict taee arate So R.R CLARK, Proprietor be found im the State, and it fur- e, Iredell) county, N. C., the title of the action mpose of the same, and the defendant to appear rm of the Superior Court county, to be held on the lash Monday in July, 1912, at the court house im paid county, ani answer or demur to the complaint of | the plaintift. - W. A. Bristol, July 6. 1912. NN 3.3 = >. SF ee a ee and & “= Z. 3 yi n 161 c Salewile, M63 eS ORDER OF PUBLICATION. = North Carolina, | Im tie Superior Iredell: County, ‘Court, 0. W. Smith’ vs. Bessie Smith. ‘ries Soles AM ELANDMARK | 0. W. Smith in this action that is On © Smith,the defendamt therein, is mot to be found im Iredell coun- ty, and cannio t after due diligence R.R CLARK, Proprietor TH be found in the State, and it fur- It is therefore ondered, that no- tice of this action be published once a week for four Landmark SY appeated before in. requiring the defendant to appear at the term of the Superior Court of Iredell county, to be held on the lash Monday in July, 1912, at the court house in paid) county, ané answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintifg. J. A, HARTNESS, Clerk of the SuperiorCourt. W. A. Bristol, Aytt’y. July 6. 1912. Nn 5S = — WW a. ~ an = me < n L6l c NN 33 = = ~~ — A ee ~~ a) a “a wn l6l ce Slalewile, NW C1 ’ MNF A. ber han, C0. QO ORDER OF PUBLICATION. ° a 7North Carolina, | Im the Superior Iredell’ County, | ‘Court. 0. W. Smith vs. Bessie Smith. It appearing from the affidavit of 0. W. Smith in this action that | Bessie Smith,the defendant therein, s1x| is mot to be found in Iredell coun-+ ty, and cannot after due diligence tor ape ta pet a: tn, ib, fu ther appearing thati the d. ndant, wife of the plaintiff, bas ww Badd) plaintiff amd efter said alban- donment lived in adultery with one and other persons || unknown to the said’ pilaintit. It is therefore ordered, that no- |tice of this action be published once a week for four weeks in, The || Landmark,a newspaper, published in }| Statesville, Iredell county, in. CR ||Setting fonth the title of the action Cc and the punpose of the Same, and ‘|Tequiring the defendant to appear j}at the term of the Superior Court of Iredell county, to be held on the lash Monday in July, 1912, at the court house im said county, ani the plaintift. a ce HARTNBESS, Clerk of the SuperiorCourt. W. A. Bristol, Att'y. July 5. 1912. 40 (a. ~~ answer or demur to the complaint of | ; HELANDMARK : R.R CLARK, PROPRIETOR HED TWICE-A-WEEk: TUESDAY AND FRID ee ne ese Salesuille, NC uv ORDER OF PUBLICATION. . North, Carolina, | Im the Superior | Iredell County, ‘Court. O. W. Smith vs. Bessie Smith. It appearing from the affidavit of} Oo. W. Smith in thiis action that | ON4 Bessie Smith.the defen dant therein, -— S1x/ nid F Coun | R.R CLARK, PROPRIETOR and other unknown to the said’ plaintittt, 4 |. it is therefore ordered, that no- , tice of this action be published |” once a week for four weeks in The & | Landmark,a newspaper published in if Statesville, Iredell] county, N. C., Setting fonth the title of the and the punpose of the same, '|Tequiring the defendant to appear ,|4t the term of the Superior Court ye wan || Of Iredell county, to beheld on the *| last Monday in July, 1912, at the We-- j)court house im paid county, ant answer or demur to the complaint of © “« #| the plaintifg. J. A. HARTNESS, Clerk of the SuperiorCourt. W. A. Bfistol, Aytt’y. July 5. 1912. ¢ L \ “ » amd f) \/ So NN 3.3 = 5 oS — ~~ Ae Ne oO a nan = O - ~” l6l c Shales, NE pu Sy 2 2 yy > + RA nt at SR i NS i cia Me Mgt North, fh Carolina. | | In the ail etic “oO. W. “smica ve. Beste smith. } ei AALS. ABRIL g It appearing from the affidavit of Ff i ewe Sew oe : ADVERTISING cate : = aac RATES R. R_ CLARK, PROPRIETOR FURNISHED ON APPLICATION aaa an aidaabiini ote HED TWICce-A- WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. swe i, says Trt pats RK wad chat the * court house im paid) county, ! answer or demur to the complaint of —, the J. A. HARTNESS, to and subscriged beiore Clerk of the SuperionCourt. 'W. A. Bristol, Ajtt*y. July 5. 1912. 0? * eee NN BB. oo ot PP wo & “= Z. 3 < “a clél Salewill, NV € cuLy cas iio MCG. a Waren. CQ. Q _ ORDER OF PUBLICATION. North Carolina, | Im the Superior == Iredell. County Court. vy } A Smith,the Wefendamt therein, ~ six] is not to be found im Iredell coun- SO. W. emi ve. Bessie smith. (3 i. TAL AA ¥ a > “4 It appearing from the affidavit of fn ; iNT f 4 Dr. + -)0. W. Smith in thiis action that - ONE Bessi jty, and cannot after due R. R_ CLARK, PROPRIETOR be f ; ee one ADVERTISING RATES FURNISHED ON APPLICATION ED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. ally appeased “ 0, bemg duly ewgrn, says that he} pear nwen o —< CAND MARK tf at the term of the Superior Court By je suaner: lished of Stat: of Iredell county, to be ‘held on the B ’ P*PS* P4bushcs at lash Monday in July, 1912, at the Be: court house im said) county, ani answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintift. nent appeO\ared it said | J. A. HARTNBESS, to and subscrigged beio Clerk of the SuperiorCourt. 'W. A. Bristol, Aytt’y. ; July 5. 1912. Yn BB. oo oF Pr wo e 2, = “: < ¥ clél lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally SHateoile, NG He — MCG. a WarWsns, Cd. O ORDER OF PUBLICATION. “7 North Carolina, | Im the Superior ‘ Iredell County. | eee : naan ono e Court. ‘ . ; 0. W. Smith vs. Bessie Smith. Bak! . ; : ¥ ‘ f 4 It appearing from the affidavit of : Dr. ADVERTISING 0. W. Smith in this action that oe Smith,the defendamt therein, RATES agro Aad gpa lg ne ae R. R_ CLARK, Proprietor FURNISHED be found: in the State, and it fur- ON APPLICATION ther appearing HED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. aetna |Said plaintiff amd after said) aban- donment lived in adultery with one Y and her persons || unknown to the said’ plaintitt. It is therefore ordered, that no- |tice of this action be published ones a week for four weeks in The Lanémark,a newspaper, published in Statesville, Iredell] county, N. C., setting fonth the title of the action and the punpose of the same, amd requiring the defendant to appear ,)at the term of the Superior Court rly newspaner nublishe of Iredell county, to beheld on the is peer last Monday in July, 1912, at the Merciss. en: appeared ia said court house im said county, an& answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintife. J. A. HARTNESS, to and subscriged peio Clerk of the SuperiorCourt. iW. A. Bristol, Aytt’y. P July 5. 1912. iar errcanainenend acta shincnn oe OP re BB. SE as wo rs no = 2. ; < n lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally cl6l Slalewill, N 6 (uLy e Ly > MCG. a IterWs.,, 0.0. Q ORDER OF PUBLICATION. = North Carolina, | Im the Superior ‘q Iredell County. | Court. 0. W. Smith’ vs. Bessie smith. | ng | s It appearing from the affidavit of be E LAN D MA R K On. SRR TRIS 0. W. Smith in this action that Bessie Smith.the defendant therein, RATES mot to be found im Iredell coun- FURNISHE <b eaniict adter Bus’ ailizenes R.R CLARK, PROPRIETOR HEO found in the State, and it fur- ON APPLICATION ther appearing that) the defendant, hep TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. ___ wife of the plaintift, has wilfully ~~ Q@nd without cause abandoned the Said) plaintiff and after said aban- {donment lived in adultery with one Y and r persons | unknown to the said’ plaintitt. It is therefore ordered, that no- |tice of this action be published once a week for four weeks in The | Landmark,a newspaper published in Statesville, Iredell) county, N. C., setting fonth the title of the action and the punpose of the same, and requiring the defendant to appear at the term of the Superior Court of Iredell county, to be ‘held on the lash Monday in July, 1912, at the court house im said county, and answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintift. J. A. HARTNESS, Clerk of the SuperiorCourt. W. A. Bristol, Astt’y. July 5. 1912. ty, be 4 a demasiicd ee eee spss LL Gam NY A B 8. = = Se So — Ww Bs ~” n = ms < v lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally 161 c ~ Peisuils AE. ZB _ 2A yy > ORDER OF PUBLICATION. “4 North Carolina, | Im the Superior e ‘4 Iredell County, | ‘Court 0. W. Smith vs. Bessie Smith. HH ; It appearing from the affidavit oe| E LAN D NI A i K DR. ADVERTISING 0. W. Smith in thiis action that Ont Bessie Smith,the defendant therein, or Ss! not to be found im Iredell coun- FURNISHED “|ty, and cannot after due dilligence R. R CLARK, PROPRIETOR THA be found im the State, and it fur- ON APPLICATION ther appearing that the defendant, 4H = 2 TWICE-A-WEEk: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. } | wife of the plaintiff, bas wilfully ie ND A ol i ~ (@nd without cause abandoned the ce jSaid plaintift and after said aban- bike / Te ] th 1+ STOO0 | oe and other persons | unknown to the said’ plaintiff. It is therefore ordered, that no- |tice of this action be published jones a week for four weeks in The Landmark,a newspaper published in Statesville, Iredell county, N. C., | Setting fonth the title of the action and the purpose of the same, and .|Tequiring the defendant to appear ,|at the term of the Superior Court | of Iredell county, to beheld on the ‘|lasth Monday in July, 1912, at the ‘}court house im said county, ané& answer or demur to the complaint of #|the plaintiff. a lived in adultery with one t J. A. HARTNESS, Clerk of the SuperiorCourt. W. A. Bristol, Att'y. July 6. 1912. 0° ( nN 5 3 = = > —_— ~~ Ww NH a. wn n = es a n 161 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally c — ccspiia oa Aleck aissog WS SA “AO “WS cl6l Smith, O. W. vs. Smith, Bessie 1912 apning ef be Fae, fete oer Lg DE Ms ‘a oo Be (tifa Hat. te cigfly || x oy rages Pia AtkdG4 A a: | de ds Cornibtacs tos fe: i tery Bul EXL tLe hs | Mia a ig} Lifiaedaal be eed oe ; We ate here § Riteatenee oy oe Op Ae til ts Oo Gh AGL ote Ppae-tfl fay 25) Gal... CO-4A_L KOOL. KE 2 Sx Smith, O. W. vs. Smith, Bessie 1912 Morice clay, om g2 f£ BI ~ 4342 ur Aepuoyy /7H7 9} 10yJB Avpuoysy Ne ayy “HOO 78 41n0g pres Ino Jo yIaI9 Fete PB : SSOUTLM, ee “THM SIY} 919q} pus uy] nok oavy pue “ou rey ursoz] ‘pfesaroje soZ.ivyo pur sysoo 4qop PI¥S 94} 19pud 0} 2104} puL Udy} yxou pore ur Aepuoyy SP?" 1azJV Aupuoyy oe OY} lo ‘pinsaroye rf" YW Ganoo pres imo a1ojoq “ora “19S SI} 10} seoy in0.C ge H Soluom pres orf}, WA oavy puy~ “piodad jo sn 0} savadde sv ‘aq ely ee smcteaie = ee Aye~g/ pies oy} Joolsya ‘papuadxa }Ms pies oy} uo se3inyo puv $}s00 r0y “ ere? LLY fo © WAS TOY}ANJ OY} Sapisoq Yqop soy UI osnoy}inod ou} 48 ay faery Jo yn0g Jotedng Ino Ul A]ozRT Svar YOUyAL Aorerreesy sro ws enzssay re 22 20, So J° Sjuatatio) puv spurt ‘sfoz;uyo pur spoo8 94} Jo vq] NOA PUSHED 9M. : Sunseryg ‘fzunoy sey of" if Hrsayy ayy b VNIIOUVO HIYON AC ALVES *SUOTRIIKG e) help ginse op PrP 7-S ty) “Ye *S4207ff \ ty er ee ae LHe be LC I Ce ae ed i fy? APS) S47) ge 4 oe ra 4 VU (PUP hao youTpe— 5 ee a £25 / ‘ ees | fap amma amet a 8 yy Sef Ute? | bs YG) fis fe 4 a ye ? Z wy) of YY 2-7 4 y 5 , 1 f, ry 2A zy BEL? FO i < MO