Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Divorce Records 1855-1913 Overcash-Powers
oO 7 Q @ $s @ ar «* Cy . Q 2 @ 4 Q @ a eg - r pe 5 ws @ eTuUT] fyseoreAC °SA *9 *f fyseoteAQ eae bolas gies ga, BO es fn. ie Weg fone eit f- CoS Pe eso Paes oe AN eee In 0 tEee ec, o a ee Pa seed ae ae a. op eee os a non Bw. oe a atlyr+ Ps ee . pel aavine Clot ar ce ty 4 ‘0 aut Po A na a Aw bw GE ane ics ie a Te Bcnengs tA tLe Sram Laem eel hin, 7 o> a pp iiinetaiants on ye 6 oe Opin ones Pet, a C-— a Nihon of Hh frat cena a Owate . a 2 @ " a @ a — - . fe. 5 > @ o 4 B 40 or *- qQ Q o = ® <4 @ ow « Cy . Q 2 @ 4S Q @ a - - ie ph 5 wr @ | a Foot ob Regina aren needs g Dn eh et oe a, A annme | ADL Th, po Ia Olle wh Jat Tyg a) degen a oe ie |oLot CL. geet. ont bon ah ae PHL e fa Gay ee se Pane ay Ee Salas a ea i — AR m2aidue qo ae — Ba Les FO ME ~~ “SA *9 °p fyseoteAQ eTuUTT fyseoreAC Overcash, J. C. vs. Overcash, Linnie Overcash, J. C. vs. ™ Overcash, Linnie eTUuUTT *Yyseol1eAC “SA *n.°p “yseoteap eta es S Pees Kh foratenZE ate Lots ph Se EE ea fret ncn cece an met Le + areca + f-taeeg Art | wot at forty as Mh OTePrA. Negnerr<g Meth eo ping ng Ai eae Vorb Jaen fA gees PESOS rn ty ties lia ofan Pane Pleat S ie Ther ge. Pomme: | oot fea 8 ie, sie. 2 iw) Z fF Z a ee Arye we | Lneeharad ek wi ZG rene Tix nengllet of Tracey pfmanmneiny L-LEPR OO! gy Pe Pee Afirr oi ame pt > — | fret Jf raw tith_} Off + frat Copp -< “SA °9 *pf SyseoteAC eTUUTT *YyseoreAD | Me Aly Corts ariet As Barr ph d —a- |} aeoppd necer<th, cence” Bf chert nh clatt Mint 2 preva oth + here £pt, a Lfrnetert Frorme Corr g boat, Ltt. CAr s fe Cathe; Vad wre Arad ee : ~ bfprdevd tc neha teS har the rick retin an VATE | pone as Ae, 5 wed + hrr Paty, Aree, J bE. Phrt ae tor wotaetry <2 hh Tp pupprt| FS Fata She de able Thang one eres a Men ba ae a etn ther Loves Mare 1 conmet n Arrts 10D Ml ttre ncS wnat Toctig oy Vitor toni aed “SA “4 +e ‘YSBO18A0 © eTUUTT *YyseoTeAD 2 @ wt Q ® a s . tr pe 5 p o @ 3 Q o <@ ar id CQ, ° Q /6b LLM Pher- i Aenane fect Tlirr= br fee Mle buf mi |e fornnny 2 -/672, log ete r Srnredl, oractmees The — 21 jm thin iw yng anasto, na | gpa et Mie tone fare Liat eee an PPT MIO CT PET aa Oh hi pei ine Vr Bod”, OnE ln rot G GP rver pRiaden diffrent a0 ofa, hemp tar ecg eft Mh fee crak Res. ret EEA : ee ie tee pOChaerv Do che ferns pada ter waded we and Cond »~Tat Jor ponent necro acti gennll alle § eases ae 1 de ig mttePiy sb pipe | Jae * aS GEAMIN s E wad ana’ jr nee in at tan ns Ru 2 J Z Tea rod Aeecpthirrne ag y? ow Se ands Fed Lfotiem go ee manic bans el ilk: hoe Maat ad a feos som taosst Aida Laat whan ths. Geratactet ) tase te Han aight) Dr Crete Ene. tw Aor Marre wer npare Vor | hart whet. no reuBiencdt 4 ee pain spans. a at Fh aan the ntlrde SL [r ton 21 « formant? hare; |Orrendth Min + . art Lav oO Ye s$@ or = Cy e Q e 2 @ 5 Q @ a - ~ . p- 5 pe ® roeeatie or eA OBR ums See coe z * Overcash, J. C. vs. Overcash, Linnie eTuUTT fyseoreAC “GA °9 o- ‘yseoteaQ [An wrabl- an Le C ore. coe Ate ae mall, CG upr-t+—<¢ ot eo Foes bporn (E,2. Ost oatye s ail ss V2 ee = p< (EF3 din 6 Hn | - ais 774>>5 (Bewet CO Ras a pat. bx gb, he Lh 27 f Pie Nate C4 i. te ae bets Coie oS ie adj. tg 4c j ce tt Be i a a Jac ¢ ihite Bite me be ew ESO Di oe ) ha Gy s Ze ee fu Js cA Cie i Be cH a oy 4-5 “$ i. Ao — Abita 3Ae r f ee Pier a Whe Lar ea Overcash, J. C. vs. Overcash, Linnie | Aart G wt Coat or gy tl | fe Pverenaes 4 Kober Draeook ”~’~ ee eo oe, nthe Cott. CMRE ten i ebrec CEES a ie ages CLA tf [Eo Cru —t C5e i = a Fee, $.F2,2.. Td. ALLI ‘ON, Sheriff, Iredell Co. ‘Overcash, Te Ue vs. Overcash, Linnie } 2 | E, Statesville, N.C. Commission to take Deposition.—Printed and for sale at Tae LanpMARK JoB OFFIC NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court Af Edd bedakha COUNTY.) , | NH TS Erby GREETING : THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO We reposing special ty ] 4 cause a | to appear before you at such time and place as you may appoint, and | oath to examine touching all such matters and thing's as.... SST Ry....ccccceeeessenersetereenensenenreceeesseneesnenes shall know of and concerning a certain matter of controversy in our Superior Court for the county of,..+4 > name hitht—e. Lier pending, wherein...... S&C sect bana ie plaintiff, and... Sete... A reco ete yn ae tee he? rash iaisae: soctuant defendant. And the deposition in writing, by you so taken, the same to transmit, sealed with your seal, to our Superior Court, to be held for said county, on tne AS Srey. ory. E43 eee oces WHICDGAS, ooccei cee 4 b, |. ¢ IPsec Og cats raw anes tee eeewanal . Ec saul eauntests , Clerk of the said Court, | . Z Bi OOR ila aries ot Dlates eee 14 ) fee 18938. Ly Po 4 p / f {/™ ¥ eee sncccenereesssesccccccessecend / Ocak Ree froeieBcaiistaaMonsigrcheie WoeeRe sees * i we Clerk Se hikes eTuUT] *yseoreAD "SA °9 °f SyseoteAQ \ LO so20-~ Cc. OV o> eaewrk =e hh a fe | ot Kh eee Fenwes Bee 744 Posen ee, hanes Pls aan Chew i | 6 Gur Che I= Fay Bo+tr (&7@ jet Atarilgg 22 Teg “SA °9 °f SyseoteAQ eTuUTT *YyseoTeAC E . CL Laer —- | | Ni Aaa , | Z kak cx a aoe ee, AG Come Seem ~— rd qe be ee <t KLe g. ee Jasess Ooze. OF te ee, ah 7 ie emi Bak 772 01 ee KK, 4 se ate, dows 2088S. Ae eae SF | Siow Cos~—3 aVce Ax P60 eee acres Ji 2213 ZZ, a ES -3 §o—~s se Care A oe. an z- a ae cca Pore” “SA 2 2p ‘yseoteaQ eTuUTT *yseoteAC Overcash, J. C. vs. Overcash, Linnie eTUUT] ‘YyseoreAC “SA Ans hu? hig aloe ek sa cat a Fs ower || aes Wiprb td tome Boge ray ae ee ae ae La one | us bt Phd het we. sh 27 bh, x Lisgs? , a0 SIF 2, a Liver Ww ter GPL, /- nb pict hexy ppvctle VA | Sirn~- Cie LE ee ¥ a4 of an~any (FIL, Ard “Jf. 2 Ba Poet phe, he tS arr all ee f eTUUTT fYyseoteAD “SA °9 =f “qseOlMAg 4 DE Louies sou he: sings clei ii ty LL feo buPs Les ‘what i Af aa Ohi dee 5 i bi Bfed blir act jbo Claes podud bi ¢ Te Plait ig Ot LieParsccia, SA daa. ae) tert tb, Jha, bs 26 en Se 47 Vacate Por G, AY ns by 2%7MS, . LE; sh if. 47 it ta prise. vo ii a Ke bois eet ae fin wnory /F7R, | | bs Aut’ Ly Piha. Fra LOR bl, Ly /F42, Oe hag ht hi agpe coer t wigs i ee <0 fo 7 Cf hi~) Ha duid ww thsars bag ae (%, eile done “dn Tha nalign» dda fates whale (otk, oe : Ps O) e1; Lge sie: Ae Petes fe On har Ad AgsiBianud feo pe ntl at eu Fis bh op | Hes Fhe a2? Ye g ae ye *SA °9 *f ‘yseotesg e eTuUTT *YyseoreAD a a _ ge Pe a ae “0 PB» Lfler err Carer pa a LA Coz 44 gettiodn cr 4 Mok! Asher err obs 444 2~ td as pee Pe owes 2 J. @O.) —_ ae g Gyfocih- eS oy, Bee | De LP-4AAG Mat oa . ZS) Sunrismr1rirnry fA Wilresh es 1,40\ © ficharn nS as 2 : a, Je pe 4: bhodT ) doy 20 mechs, LS8 fa PM EM 98 Ae . T, total aut F 3H wee bis gf Why tt Ee) “SA on 2p ‘YSBOteAd - eTuUTT *yseoteAD ArtCo Le. | | neen € | a ™ ‘ [Ze Cama A Erte am ele ee, a | = eae “L Ar ok - Bie net Anh | Aor5 (Sc Prine k, os Yo | OS Frere rk Ow ok Cs pe oc | eh, nat Oe. see |G eet DAA SG rhe 2-1) A eax Lyek Sywree et a> femiicy | jeAenpa st, fe me, frente 9 Ph ps | eae LZ _ 4 4 he 2 fvth 7 £4 , bse = | is. Abate iidts $6 6 Moy ale wilet. heck Th oe Te encase Cur Th, nar Aeret Ge Si dws [Sate Cesc . Pie (Pitrrcss - horn (EP, Avra heonr Joy Yn of Ae Pe (BLE A3 lr cg CUA pot Ce ope A “SA “n° “GeBOteA0 etTuuT] *yseoreAC Loot TFE2 Ae. a Coit ional pdLbery | Or. Ve AP tro, ~ Lper~ lileundteeavi pa ~~ 2 PT ET RTT oe ‘ a ON ETT gy | Lee hes aes BG elas 4. fet od | iV we “Overcash, J. C. vs. 1893 Overcash, Linnie SUPERIOR COURT---SUMMONS In Accordance With Chapter 66 Public Laws 1927 IREDELL COUNTY—In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA: To the Sheriff of (2c County—GREETING ye YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED 70 SUMMONS. 2 the defendant....... above named, if be found within your County, to be and appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court, for the County of Iredell, at the Court House in Statesville, not later than THIRTY DAYS from date of service of this summons, and answer the complaint, a copy of which is hereto attached, (or which will be filed in the office of Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County within the time as set out in the attached order) and let the said defendant....... take notice that if... 4#@—— fail to answer the said complaint within the time required by law, the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this... LO day of... AAR OG Clerk Superior Court, [redell Count ‘> ‘f YSBI9AQ “SA “FW YRIVS “YSedIsAQ 6761 IuUb i 5 By y WYO AAG o3, kn) aaY. 2 Ge = Soe pe: POATIIOY J°}}Y Joy suowuing LYNOD UOMMAdNS TraaqaHUl x CIPOLLA Loe We, and each of us, acknowledge ourselves bound unto ‘the Defendait.. herein named in this action, in the sum of two hundred dollars, to be void, however, if the within named Plaintiff shall pay the defendant... all such costs as the Defendant...... may recover of the Plaintiff. in this action. “- Witness our hand... and seal... this the... ae sae pil | isons (SEAL) (SEAL) ttre cee IS) oh maketh oath that he is a resident of er North Canina; ‘and oak TWO HUNDRED dollars over and above all his liabilities and legal exemptions allowed by law. ? * Sworn to and subscribed before me this | Sees OMY Ob ee wf eon w(SEAL) ...(SEAL) ~ Clerk Superior Court. ‘> “f Yseo1OAQ ‘SA “J YBILG “YSBIIOAG 6761 ‘> ‘f YsedloAQ ‘SA “F YeIeS “YSBIIOAQ 6c61 North Carolina. | In the Suverior Court. Tredell County. | Mrs. Sarah E. Overcash, vs GC: 0 BP? hb & Ek. J, C. Overcash,. fhe plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges and says, for cause of actions lst. That the plaintiff and defendant inter- married in Iredell County on or about Sept. Srd, 1895, and ever since have been and now are husband and wife, 2nd. That the plaintiff is a residant of Iredell County, North Carolina and has been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceding the commencement of this action;-that the defendant is a resident of Iredell County, North Carolina. - Srd. That on or about the lsat day.of June, 1927, the defendant began to neglect the plaintiff and to absent himself from home and stay away frequently over night, without the plaintiff knowing where he was, and otherwise to neglect and abandon the plaintiff and fail to provide her with the necessary supovort; that on or about May , 1928, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff, without fault on her part, and has not since lived in the relation of maniand wife with this plaintiff. 4th. That on or about May » B26, and at divers times prior thereto, the defendant, J, C. Overcash, committed adultery with various women whose names are unknown to this plaintiff and in May ,1928, the said J, ¢, YVvercash committed adultery with one, > &@ Woman of ill repute whose name’ is unknown to this plaintiff, but who then resided near the City of Concord, N, @. 5th. That since the commission of said acts, plaintiff has not lived with the defendant as she be sranted an avsolu div x i n he defend ant that the bonds of matrimony no 2 oh a Sead fo€ney for the Plaintiff irs. Sarah H. vercas! being aduly sworn, deposes she has read the regoing complaint and that the 1er Own a ouinaee. exce as to those matters 2in stated upon information and belief, and as elieves Le be true; that she has been a@ bona reside of the 51 of North Carolina ror two yéars next ediately preceding the commencement of this action and that complaint is not made out of levity or collusion vetween plaintiff and defendant, or for the mere purpose of being freed and separate from th eres but in arora and truth for the causes alleged in the complaint, That facts set for the complaint as rrounds for ai vores have ex] fasp k RES" DE8, “HB HUSBE LY SG <9. ne pponestn ROntRe Debabidints Ve Overcash, Sarah E. vs. Overcash, J. C. 1929 ° < oO Sea Q & ” a ta 2 © < oe = Q 9 ~” a DN S tr < e 6c6l CIVIL SUBPOENA—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, North Carolina. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA To the Sheriff of _---5 Mice... County-GREETING: You ARE HEerepy CoMMANDED TO SUMM personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county at the Court House in Statesville, North Carolina, on t®- Pog _/.--day of --ZF A ar FJ bi Cg ee itn; there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of -------- [AE he ff Be ee z - 5 ee ee. Deak St. 2 Sein re. Ze Aon - Plaintiff... Ae hehpendl. ff I. Tt, Lobe! ay Vv: .- Defendant-_-- ° < @ QO p n Pr ~ ay O © < a on Q & n r DY a — Sa < ¥ 67c6l CIVIL SUBPOENA—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, North Carolina. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 4927_._, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of... leenAa gy, Rb pies eipakh boii cae cae in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein Plaintiff.___, and o < oO = OQ © ” FP — O © < oa eal Q see) ~” Fr. DY 5 =a ag < 7 6c61 cork svt ° < a 4 Q & ”n rr fone OQ © < a 34 ° © n P YM a i tT) < ¥ 6761 © < g a & Fr O © a o = o $9 ” r YD 5 5 7 < ¥ 6761 CIVIL SUBPOENA—Printed and for bale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, North Osrolina STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA To the Sheriff of ripeld. . -County—GREETING: personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for 1D said aN. at the Court House in Statesville, North Carolina, on = of og 94.410 $ --.-, then and Clerk ‘Superior Court for Iredell County. LTE ©O << a al Q $<) ” P ed -—QD © < 3 = Q fe 7 & Y 8 or 7 < ¥ I 676 ° < a = Q be] ” re bom OQ ©O < @ 4 O p n r DN % 5 7 < ry 6761 North Carolina | Iredell County | In the Superior Mrs. Sarah E. Overcash vs ee 2G3 Overcash 1. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the complaint? Answer. | Ze Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for twoyears next imnediately preceding the commencement of this action? Answer. 3. Did the defendant, J. C. Overcash, commit adultery, 4§& alleged in the complaint? Answere a e LAA AA te a Ben “> ‘f ‘YSedI9A0 ‘SA “q Yeseg “YSBOIOAC, 6761 North Carolina } In the Superior Court, Iredell County | May Term, 1929. Mrs. Sarah E. Overcash vs JUDGMENT € so 8; Overcash ae ¢ ‘ ‘ oe “fe oe ve roe x yy This cause coming on to be heard at the May Term, 1929, of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and being heard, before his honor, Oglesby, Judge presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as follows: "1, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry, as alleged in the complaint? Answer, Yes. 2, Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next immediately preceding the commencment of this action? Answer. Yes. 3, Did the defendant, J. C. Overcash, commit adultery, as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Yea.” It is, therefore, ordered, considered and adjudzed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing petween the plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved and set aside absolutely and the plaintiff is awarded an absolute divorce from the defendant. It-is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action. This the 27th day of May, 1929. tk i Presiding 0 IT6I 5 AreWZ ‘Yyseo124G SA“ “H “A ‘YseoiaagG SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. County.-~ $n the Superior Court. Iredell SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, 3 ” County—GREETING : To the Sheriff of. Iredell Mary...Overcash Dou are hereby Commanded to summon which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three take notice if..she...tiex fail to answer to the said complaint days of said Term, and let said Defendant will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. within that time, the plaintiff Hereof fai] not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this... 218%. .day Clerk of Su Are ‘yseoi2aG ‘SAE "HA ‘YSPOI9AQG [161 pearag ——= ‘AuN0D” + TEpeay 3° yanoyg rorsdng 23 jo “"O} 9[QeBANoOy Sapa oT ~“eeeaead Kaa N LSNIVOV “YS eOasRO “EEK” 131734 Y0d SHOWWAS ¥, L ““TTSpSazy” BHEyS “48Tg dequeady PAu ~ SESS T Ot “YSBOIEAOH Aare TwepuSeysep Sty” [l6peay UF PunoZ oq OF JOU SF ie I ‘M84 ty Bi: o . a > ba <4 5 a wens, . . SI} 9M a1OJaq paeqliosqns pue 0} UIOMG *suOTjNOaxd uwl013 Jdurexe Ajzado1d pur sarjtiqet] ‘syqep sty eAoqe pue 19A0 + ‘yINOD Ioedng 24} BY ‘¥NITONYD HLYON SO AL¥YLS 5 AreW Yseo12aG SA" “H ‘A ‘YseoiaaG North Carolina # In the Superior Court, [l6I Iredell County # £January Term 1911, W. H. B. Overcash, Plaintiff, # versus # Affidavit for Publication of Mary Overcash, Defendant. # the Summons, W. H. B. Overcash, being duly sworn deposes and says: That in the above entitled action now pending in the Superior Court of Ired¢ll County, the sheriff of said county has returned the summons issued to him in said action endorsed "The Defendant Mary Overcash is not to be found in Iredell Countys:" that the cefendant therein cannot after due dilligence be found within the States; that said de- fendant is a proper party to said action, the game being one for divorce a vinculo matrimonit; wherefore, the said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the court that service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina, 3x subscribed before LK. yx Ye dtCg LK — Sworn to and Are ‘Yseo12aG SA“ “H “AM ‘Yseoi0aG [T6I North Carolina # In the Superior Court, Iredell County # January Term 1911, W. H. B. Overcash, Plaintiff, # versus # Complaint, Mary Overcash, Defendant. # The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges:— First:— That in the year 1904 the plaintiff and the de- fendant intermarried, and ever since said time have been and now are husband and wife; that said marriage took place in Iredell County, said State. Second:— That the defendant, in the year 1906, committed adultery with one Jake Urey; that the defendant also committed adultery with one Julius Owens, prior to the time she abandoned the plaintiff as hereinafter alleged; that about Easter 1909, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff, separated hereself from the plaintiff and went away from the home of the plaintiff and the de— fendant, and since said time the plaintiff has known nothing of the whereabouts of the defendant; that her abandonment of the plaintiff was wilful and without cause on her part and without any fault on the part of the plaintiff; that the plaintiff at the time the defendn t abandoned him, did not know of hor having committed adultery as afore— said; that the plaintiff never lived with the defendant as husband and wife at any time after he had knowledge of her having committed the acts of adultery complained of, and did not in way condone the adultery of the defendant, Third:— That the plaintiff has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years and more immediately preceeding the institution of this action, and is now a resident of Iredell County, said State, Fourth:— That there has been no issue of said marriage. \ Wherefore, the plaintiff demands judgment that he be \ divorced from the defendant a vinculo matrimonii, and that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintirr and the defendant be Arew- ‘yseoi2aG ‘SAG *H “~ “YSBd19AG, [l6I dissolved, and for such Other and furth relief as may be just and proper, ¢ Lg hiice) aK Lato Bee e Sel for the Plaintiff, Wo EB, Overcash, being sworn Says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; that said complaint is not made out of levity of by collusion between husband and wife, nor for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in Sincerity and truth for the Causes mentioned in the complaint; that. the facts Set forth in the said complaint, as grounds for divorce, have ex- isted to his knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint; and that the Plaintiff has been a resident of the State for two years next , oe the of the complaint, Sworn to and subscribed before Af 7S Jere ache | AAALA?-T 218 Foe. of Nov. 1910, cite ao? ork Superior Court, L en es AASGO, Overcash, W. H. B. vs. Overcash, Mary 191] AreW ‘yseoioac SA“ "HM ‘Yseorag North Carolina # In the Superior Court, Il6I Iredell County # January Term 1910, W. H. B. Overcash, Plaintiff, # versus # Order of Publication of Mary Overcash, Defendant, # Summons, It appearing from the affidavit of W. H. B. Overcash in this action, that Mary Overcash, the defendant therein, is not to be found in Iredell County, and cannot after due dilligence be found in the State, and it further appearing that said action is one for divorce @ vinculo matrimonij and that the defendant is & necessary party to said actions: It is therefore ordered, that notice of this action be published once a week for six weeks in The Landmark, a newspaper published in Iredell County, setting forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same, together with a brief recital of the subject matter of the same, and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to be held on the 5th Monday before the 1st Monday in March 1911, the same being the S0th day of January 1911, at the Court House in said County, and answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff, or the relief therein demanded will be granted, athkt (2 sem ses errs Clerk Superior Court, This Nov, 2lst, 1910. | DKA. IZ OpesrosZhy . GY] UA fCreree eh.) Overcash, W. H. B. vs. Overcash, Mary 191] : Arey ‘YSBd19A09 SA“ "H “A ‘Yseoroag [Il6I - Z ee i a 0 es a ge a a ate Ot ark “ d ne. - “ ; Z LPL Aget é ay a aft ou? Cor. w3t Lt ote € t / ! Ae G LA [72 Kad He Ak 4 , AreW “Yseo121C SA"€ “H “M ‘YseoiagG Il6I Eee Corcivg ge 7, be oe tS pores SAO TH : Oe Yel Cid lg os cnt ites 8 fo ce oe so Oe dl ALke ge) a pen: ¢_~ Lfrtrev Zt BP - : OCbe oo, SoZ 4 Prtire/ a ge ee. KL. Che. 0s € KCC oo C~C Gives ty C0 £3. oO RA<ct£ LUCCH, a, aay foc ee 1 a Ae de eed Lhe Mh Chae aflgret a eH Herd AreW ‘Yseos2aG SA“ “H ‘A ‘YseoioaG [l6I st , SN RN tna Ba ome se ER, 4 - Ae ccc foe V9 $4, | | | Arte ees feet eaten es Rae z2ee Cree Zz Exc ee hse a. tT ae \earce Gnuerlete Mt ee ee | (Aaa ee a eal Laoresfi-Cbicens, 4 of beflececle et Phe apy pees <1 Ph of pace eCBLSE?Z Ze ee as ae Lt-ee vd Zlce Ge Poe 2eeteet pre = ae co OL sete eee fer gecauwd feleate secre hofer eh ee d LleP 2A eee | ! | | | "9 | Mat fliarlhhe a pte cee Le ee, Cogeco sf ler hee ‘nC eee 12tcegn. (4Ccree Tt oe. ee wi A daa ee Lo Cc eile ce es haaeg CAG GOES bat Caer Js, Of l Macrl ff, fetct- 4-6 lec eel neeG Led MeJ~ecez ake fyreen J cren the eee, wes gen 2) Lehane ~ PARE Popes: al Le pleut rwheo Dbtshiete Geee Catt Arec€ ftlhaet fe ~ fa e4e27-XK Fee CA ey herd Caen £3 Avs eh ee lee EECECEL TD lA ont. Lefers, # Mee JS OC ZezZ Le e274 ee. von] | | hertecet. dae a: YES, pf Me tin LD SEGRZ,, GK free Maced Th clubney ject Lacan hey, Cece Zeer Ge frerl af, (fhe lctrel Gf, 422’ cog <aedl toby ' ferz Cel ie Fae een left Yor Jecces . pep fae cei mg —e Cte bee2< Set local dene toda piece ZA, name 4 ae Le ge SE tee ante neg, a : een foe. 7 tcplcocCn 7 y - ttn her +t ' Sa Pe 7 ist. ~— er — a i Jar, — Joa, mee at a“ ee corcece lah cote Cony Citmm. Clee | wo+k,. Lhabi? : 4 A Mec ~eh head atpy get. Jeet last” (defies ites “ix € Chee seer tll eae loch v0 dacece F Base «. CV «eer Ler ct | Maes CLK Hberefcer “ae fx Cerect <7? ea ie A. Kecrex« Seecceer Ci scsi nite case jae been I Af ER ee Ze : petece LAK he Mex ere ceed tect Jesrees ] a a ee. ef CaN Mine | Chet Pa ~lL2Z B= & Wy bute: Prvstthnnnl e ee Ji pr 69 Le (herda tuban Artery \Ceteccfitecetl Wz Sea ten be2z1 ak NE LO OT Me Le Cue fet LA, Vhcetetl Cosecfe- tee £9 eee 1 tee ceren S24 ap Le te, 40 ee Mee Meee os X Vewses Aca Hen hopes aercd, Fitcat Sos ee yee (prerZe @te ef eer s 0.8. eh E va , a ta cz <2 corre le ZZ20% Aap, Lote f pe : ne Veecttzee J) AZ Ate 7 — Jezel eT peeecects Lf. lo Mel «ve “ceteY 2c << Jesns Ce<zec . ons ao“ > re tes CAtve7 Pr (LAL | Wx Clee tetht1aticZaaceA. Virco (ee ee ee | ene ceil Woes Jase Mee. ae. Tue ff fn 4. Ceccet Onl La ciox, fhe fet LAL Lace ee car wee (Reece ecu C241 ZK Cotto’ ae bal Cet Lan So Si ehee (ect e~ aeec€ ex Aoflere cnet, A201 cs Jew (PFEEANG CA Jette of 4 SF fe ei acdc en Lic tn Meg ? fae Lee kK or Mlle eit o} newer’ oe 2 a, ew Lac Gel iccect a Pecandagr iad Ge | ‘e [tte AD hed eel a. fa An Cen’ Cece tlee ¢<tct el “Ke sD le —{ 2 K cen G0 hawnoCiney (F#é-E2£44 Mas x. seecelD leJers tx the Lear poll | Jacek eee CSceecel,” a 4 Monch Ctercees dered Lc tee 2. EC Aen net Leen Mala aferoak ¢ La Loree € Jer (Pe <2<_ ie 2 dei D peep be Jee es hr cnspengl ow a % ried aaa ie ia Cee ADM hy. ace eLeen A/S Se 4 07 Cozen-ty BL, a é 7 § 4 a : q esoy £ Yys¥oz049 *SA “HK "M “WsRetea. esoy ‘ysPor0ag *SA “W°M SYSBoteAQ neg Mae leweee Loren, Layeicees Me 2a oe. L fay Pac 2. fae. A ee - it i} i} : Aacaly F224 ~ Tg G42, erle vey A i 4 Adsq ‘syieg ‘SA Aasteq ‘syze d 9161 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF —J udge.—F rinted and for sale b Br ‘ad. F rintin Compan; Statesville, N. Q. ? SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State-of North Garolina. To the Sherif of ON See 3 cattle ; YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to summon the defendant.. above named, if__lev_be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of- OE. R22 at the Court House in DA ToAgn0le on the. *—Monday ficy-the._1.°*__Monday of Wee 191._, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if. ho.__ther failsto answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. _ tay of Thevebent Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. 2. ja #32 Posd a SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Returnable to YOmus.0ns4 Term, 191@-- of the Superior Court ot EB UES County. KK Received Neville, 2.7 191 $_- Weptus.dasct, they links, Matt he’ fraud a. Ore day —_— Fee, JWY. 2.) -J416 o. J Parks, Daisey vs. Parks, Espy 1916 SIY} SUL eLogoq paqraosqns pus 0} u10Mg I I i \ ' ' ' i Q. © *q ° M4 ‘s}qep sty eA0qe pue J9A0 Ajtedoad pue SOT}T]IGer] ‘SUOTjNDEXe WOIy yduIoxe sureq EN TNA ons Hine ae en Nain taeaa wc Pedpuny OM} Jo wns ayy YOM SI ay sfes uIOMS SdeBl[[Op CTF Asati ane n ua eeta scene ey SR areas eg (‘[Reg) ENE Me sath iuoe ee ae SIq} ‘s[ees pue spuey ano SSOUYT AA a, JO SGD ts ih V7 5-5 ara tee hn nin JUBpUdJeqy 9Y1 se 4so9 PHU YT IY} JO taaover Lem ------ “U0T}OB SITY} Ul ~----~ HUUrelg oy ‘TOAOMOY yons |e ~"""“guepueyzaq ey <ed Tleys--------- yUBpUazeq 94} ouyoe aM WoT}OB siy} UT ---- JO UMS 94} UT < REPT nen aed i ee galt a lo, PIOA aq 0} ‘ oyan punoq seayasano dSpoTM uoby ( "Ryunog---~--------+-----2- 22 | VNI'IONVO HLYON 410 ALVLS P4NOD sorsadng oy) uz NORTH CAROLINA In the Superier Ceurt IREDELL COUNTY January Term, 1916 . DAISY PARKS ,PLAINTIFF, ESPY PARKS ,DBFENDANT . The plaintiff abeve named ,cemplaining of the defendant fer cause ef actien,alleges and says : °-FIRST<- Theat the plaintiff and @efendant interemarried en Adsq ‘syieg ‘sa Aasteq ‘syreg the 30th day ef July,1908,in Iredell Ceunty,and ever since have been,and new are ,jhusband and wife . ~~ SHCOND-- That en er abeut the 15th day ef @cteber ,19135 ,the SI6I defendant ,wilfully and witheut any just cause whatever and with- eut fault en the part ef this plaintiff,deserted and abandened plaintiff ,left the State and has net since lived with ,er in any wise centributed te the suppert ef said plaintiff,and ever since has and still centinues se te wilfully and witheut just cause , abanden and desert the plaintiff and te live separate and apart frem her witheut any just reasen, whan by Cornet aut Oqaual oe --THIRD-- That the plaintiff is new,and has been fer mere than twe years next preceeding the cemmencement ef this actien, _& bena fide resident ef the State ef Nerth Carelina; WHEREFORE ,plaintiff prays judgment against the defendant that she be granted a diverce a mensa et there frem said defendant and fer such ether and further relief as she may be entitled te . ATTO Daisey Parks ,plaintiff in the abeve entitled actien, being duly sworn ,depeses and says; hat the facts set ferth in her cemplaint as a cause ef actien are true te the best ef her knewledge and belief;that the Complaint is net made eut ef levity er by cellusien between husband and wife fer ihe mere purpese ef being freed and Separated frem ene anether ,but in a@incerity and in truth fer the causes mentiened in said cempl- aint and that the facts set ferth therein as greunds fer Cempisint have existed ta her knewledge fer at least six menths prier te the filing ef her cemplaint and that she has been a Ads¥ ‘syseg resident ef the State ef Nerth Carelina fer twe years next pre- ceeding the cemmencement ef this actien, 0 ») e ‘oll a 7 @ a | a ce < yn et \o _ nN Swern te and subscribed befere me this o day fee, 1915. “ie en apt war aig On COURT . Nerth Carelina In the Superier Court Iredell Ceunty January Term 1916. ‘Daisey Parke , plaintiff, o> VEe~e~ AFFIDAVIT TO OBTAIN SERVICE OF Espy Parke, defendant. . SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. Daisey Parks,plaintiff abeve named ,being first duly swem depeses and says : That in the abeve entitled actien new pending in the Superier Ceurt ef Iredell Ceunty ,the Sheriff ef said Ceunty has retumed the summens issued te him in said actien endersed, * The defendant Espy Parks net te be found in Iredell Ceunty;seid te be out ef the State ";that the defen dnt Adsq ‘syieg ‘sa Aasteq ‘syseg therein cannet after due diligence be feund within the State;that \o — nN @ cause ef actien exists against the said defendant in faver ef the plaintiff as fellews;a cause ef actien fer diverce a mense et ‘thepe upen statutery greunds; WHEREFORE, the said plaintiff prays that an erder may be made by the Ceurt that service ef summens in this actien may be made en said defendant by publisiitien.in seme newspaper published in Iredell Ceunty Werth Carelmae . This 27th day Nev.1915. 19 ‘ [a fy Q T Subseribed and swern te befere me this the 27th day Ne vember ,1915. IWant! (anata Nerth Carelina In the Superier Ceurt Iredell Ceunty January Term, 1916 . Daisey Parks,plaintiff, ---V8e=- ORDER OF PUBLICATION . Bspy Parks ,defendant, It @ppearing te the Court frem the affidavit ef Daisey Parks in this actien,that Bepy Parks,the defendant therein is net te be feund in Iredell Ceunty ,and can net,after due diligence be found within the State,and it further appearing that @ cause ef actien fer diverce @ mensa et there exists in faver Adsq ‘syzeg "sa Aasteq ‘syseg ef the plaintiff herein and against the defendant: IT IS THEREFORE ,ordered and adjudged that summens in — ‘© —_ nN this actien be served en said Bepy Parks by publicetien,and te that end that netice ef this actien be published ence a week fer feur weeks in the Landmark ,a newspaper published in Iredell : Ceunty ,setting ferth the title te the action ,the purpese ef the same ,and requiring the defendant te appear at the Term ef the Superier Ceurt ef Iredell Ceunty ,te be held en the fifth Menday befere the first Menday in March 1916 at the Ceurtheuse in said Ceunty,and answer er demur te the complaint ef the plaintiff, This 27th day Nev.1915. \ seme P. A. Bryant ,Business Manager ef the Landmark, & newspaper published in Iredell Ceunty ,and state aferesai d,being duly swern ,says; That the annexed advertisenent ef netice in the actien entitled,” Daisy Parks vs. Bepy Parks” ,was duly published in the eferesaid newspaper ence @ week fer feur weeks beginning with the issue dated Nevember 50th ,1915. Swern te and subscribed befere me Qrernrun ne (Gey “is Pel p. Lhd this the 2k Ney Decenber 915, ry gs BR ie] 2s = 8 te < ~“ S161 NORTH CAROLINA IREDELL coun ry P. A. Bryant ,Business Manager ef the & newspaper published in Iredell Ceunty Landmark , and state aferesaid,being That the annexed advertisenent actien entitled," Daisy Parks vs, duly Swern ,says; ef netice,in the Espy Parks" ,was duly published in the aferesaid newspaper ith the ence @ week fer feur weeks beginning issue dated Nevember 50th ,1915. ern te and subscribed befere me : Pree A (i ] Cpl “LP 4 te, his the 2% aay Decenber ,1915, , f t. (Airs, 1 «Wet Oe ian ative Adsq ‘syreg ‘sa Aasteq ‘syreg 9161 ARTAOMAD WHOM YiuvOo JIRCRAT (Sinobial 8s Ye tegenmeN seentaud, SHOE 1A Lg eled,clesetele elese bra, yirwed [lebeat m2 bedelisvg 18geqewen « $6: - S9tJen Ye Josewaltiaqqvbe bexenna eft tant ¢o yar, fiewea Celidug Vive saw, Sdueq (ge ev aise yeled *.besitene nei‘on bleestele efis ai Ms a Bn linkyged, @A°ew 1:61 16t ween @ sone 19 ga grees -ClOl. qj 96% tedvemvek betab eumet ers «) iw ®&% O1¢€%0d bedlaioedve bane @3 mie? Ah etl i eens : : wae THGED SOOT Yak at eli ee tes | we? E Adsq ‘syseg ‘SA Aasteq ‘syreg O16! North Caroline Iredell County Daisy parks ve Espy Parks eLlegea in the complaint *? ment of this action ? Anewer | SRD. Die the defer “the plaintiff as alnegea | 18T. Did the plaintiff and defendant inter-marry as been @ resident of the State next preceeding the commence- ——- Separate himself from end abandon the complaint ? Adsq ‘syseg ‘sa Aasteq ‘syreg SI6I Anak Qtr ote der ture ae frreording The Commi Quosl 4 Ws else Qugioc, > ; Bro L0ed the Dope Bars Dopovate Rurreee{ fran dud MbABom Portes, ce atteged tn Ua Omplaund OLHLeE, 4a.” acest Mt Lo Mars} on Orders S, Conardores Aid) aby dead Hd fant, be Gud he ue beaaty grains « Arges Parks, Daisey vs. Parks,Espy 1916 « Bill of Coste—Civil.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Original Summons, or other original process, including all names therein - « + § T.coff---- Appeal from Clerk to Judge Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . Subpoena, each name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian . . . Judgment Against Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury. Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . "| Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Adsq ‘sysreg SA Aasteg ‘syreg Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . .. \o — nN Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgment Kexecttionrand Sheriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00 Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each.. 10 County Tax, when Jury impareled Referee’s Allowance snjny ‘uossey zed °SA eyuuy ‘uosiezzeg TT TT TT TT ERE AEN AER AR ee RR RCI” =e ame Aen em tere pivfeeectieannpene nates ine nalts eatY “I North Carolina,: Iredell County In the Superior Court - January Term-1°08&, Annie Patterson 3 vs, Complaint. Rufus Petterson .:; The plaintiff compluining or the defendant alleges and says: 1. That the plaintitf intermarried with thé defendant Rufus Patterson during the month of December,1°0? in, Jredell eounty,N.C.,and thenceforth from that time until the present the rarriare relation has existed between the said parties. ©. That at once after the marriave above mentioned the aaid vnliairtiff discovered th at the defendant wes ar habitual drunkard and the said i defendant has continued to be an habitual drunkard and still is at this time. That about one year after the rarriage above set forth the i let 4 became abusive toward the plaintiff and at times would strike and beat her ' and curse her and as time went on the abuse and beating became more frequent and more violent until his conduct toward her has made her condition intolerable and life burdensome. That at this time the plaintiff is not living with the plaintiff and is not contributing anything to her support. But on the other hand the said defendant forces the plaintiff to give him money which she has made by honest toil to buy liquor end carouse on, Wherefore the plaintiff prays the court to grant an order tixorekuxxkhe RAXAXPLAKNKKRKx KK KKK Keexankaxdefendamk for divorce from bed and board of the said plaintiff and her hueband Rufus Patterson and for such other and further relief as the court may deer the plairtiff entitled to, bite Cn 8, Attorney for Plaintiff. Annie Patterson being sworn deposes and says: That the facts set forth in the foergoing, petition are true to the best of her knowledge and belief, except as to those matters the ein stated on information and belief and as to those matters she believés it to be true- that she has filed the said complaint not out o f levity nor pol suesen between the said husband and wife-and not for the mere purpose offreeing and separating the satd husband and wife,but in sincerety and truth for the eauses mentioned in’ bhe complaint- that the said facts have existed to the rnowledre of the viairtiff for six monthe prior to the filing of t jis complaint and the said Annie Patterson has been a resident of the State North Carolina for two years next precedinp the filing of this complairt. Ar~ és Ya VW +t B a, J t A 42 T Jn KX comin Sworn to and subscribed to before me this the 9th day of vgnuary,19Cé&. Vn (AL akht. Justice of the Peace. Patterson, Annie vs. Patterson, Rufus SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. County.--9n the Superior Court. Tredell "T 4yor “yo0orag ‘SA “f o18uy ‘yo00Reg Angie J, Peacock 8061 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. AGAINST Jno, L, Peacock State of North Carolina, Iredell ssi county—GREETING : To the Sheriff of Wou ate hereby Commanded to Summon _..JNO + L, Peacock and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the day of Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant........ take notice if a. fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff............ will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. 30 Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this "T Wyor “yD00"ag ‘SA ‘f a18uy ‘yooorag 8061 ~ S8eorry ~ 2297 rage Sup ipToy ““PaAIeg 3 og Aen “ttOg Lem” peapood qensny 0} a[QenInyey ALIAS WOd SNOW NDS (OTN ¥ UETU “yoooweg “T “our — ISNIVOV nog T1epeay UF puNOT ~“Yooowed *p eTsuy Tt +9061 kqu r “Sus TOU “Teepest jo yNOD Jouedng a} jo “AduIOWY SyyUreld “eq 09 yOu St yoOoueg “T “OUL o61 *g061 we -puafag ay} sp 4809 yans 1]0 ay} fi ‘danamoy ‘pion aq 09 ‘s4npjoq LSNIVOV “AINNOQ) ‘YNISTONVO HLYNON SAO ALYLS "T uyor “yD00Rag ‘SA “f a1Buy ‘yooorag 8061 \ Commission to Take Deposition. —Printed and for sale tla Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N.C. NORTH CAROLINA) In the Superior Court. Iredell... :. COUNTY. ~ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ToEdward C, Wyckoff, Esqr., GREETING: special ae and confidence in your integrity, do authorize and empower you to We, reposin Westey hydrs and Frank Travis to appear before you at such time and place as you may cause appoint, and them. to examine touching all such matters and things as... they shall know of concerning a certain matter of controversy in our Superior Court Angie J. Peacock plaintiff for the County of Iredell pending, wherein saa Jno. L, Peacock defendant. And the deposition in writing, by you so taken, the same to transmit, sealed with your seal, to our Superior Court, to be held for said County, on the ord day of August. 190 8, A, Hartness , Clerk of’ said Court, at office Statesville, hb le Crze, Witness J. in Iredell County.» N, Cas May. 30, ~ “T ayor yooseag ‘SA “f aI8uy ‘yoooreg 8061 Ny Commission to Take Deposition. —Printed and for s sale ay Brady, ‘The Printer, Graveavilie, N. . NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court. _ Iredell. COUNTY. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ToEdward C, Wyckoff, Esqr., GREETING: special hg and confidence in your integrity, do authorize and empower you to We, reposin Wostey flyérs and cause... Frank Travis to appear before you at such time and place as you may appoint, and them... to examine touching all such matters and things shall know of concerning a certain matter of controversy in our Superior Court Angie J. Peacock plaintiff as... they . for the County of Iredell pending, wherein and Jno. L. Peacock defendant. And the deposition in writing, by you so taken, the same to transmit, sealed with your seal, to our Superior Court, to be held for said County, on the Srd day of August 190 8, A, Hartness , Clerk of said Court, at office Statesville, 0 Mer Cee, Clerk Cee Court. Witness. J « in Lredell County.» Na C.,.May.50, 8061 "Ty ayo “yD008ag ‘SA ‘f a18uy ‘yoooreg North Carolina#f In the Superior Court. Iredell County # Angie J.Peacock # vs # Jno. L.Peacock # Pursuant to the annexed commission to me direoted,! Edward C.Wyckoff,commissioner,under the authority thereof, on the 15th day of June 1908,at 10 o'clock A.M. at my office in the Seacoast Bank Building,in the City of Asbury Park,County of Monmouth,State of New Jersey,neither party being present proceeded to take the deposition of Frank Travis,who being first duly sworn to speak the truth between the said plaintiff and defendant,deposes and says; Q. What is your name, age, residence and occupation? A. Frank Travis, 27 years old, Allaire, Monmouth County, N.J. and occupation sauyer. Q.2. Are you personally acquainted with John L. Peacock the defendant in #hesabesve this action? A. I am, Q3. How long have you known him? A. I came to Allaire about the eighteenth of, November and - met him there and knew him until on or about April 1,1908. I ate and slept at the same house as he did during that time. Q4, Do you know his general character? A. It is doubtful I might say loose. Q &. What is it, good or bad? A. Bad, Q 6. What is his general character, if you know, for morality and virtue? As Immoral. Q 7. State whether or not you have any knowledge relative to his having committed fornication and adultery or relative to 8061 “T Wyor “yd00vag ‘SA ‘f oIBuy ‘yoooReg Peacock vs Peacock -Re Q.7 -continued= ¢ his having lived in fornication and adultery? A. I did, as State in detail all you know concerning same, Ae This woman came to our camp and sleeping quarters about half past seven one evening and we four was in the room to- gether when the girls came in. We was in the room six of us together until about nine o'clock and the two girls and Wesley Myers and John Peacock left the house, They returned about ten o'clock that night and the four went in my room and I stayed there all night and,left there next morning about six o'clock and they were still there. I went into the room while they were there and saw Peacock and Annie Bennett lying in the bed together and Peacock's clothes haging on the bed but I do not remember whether I saw her clothes in the room or not. I do not kmow when she left the house, — Qe. De With whom has he committed fornication and adultery, and when? Give her name, A. 3 Annie Bennett about three months after I came there, Q 10. During what period of time has said cohabiting to- gether of the defendant and said woman continued? Witness must give in detail all the facts and circumstances surround- ing same, A. The time I have above described except that I have seen them meet on the street near the Inn three or gour times, Krak Toran The foregoing deposition of Frank Travis was sworm to and subscribed before me at the time and place mentioned above. This fifteenth day of June, 1908. 7 4 a CUjehff Commissioner, “T Wyor “yooorag ‘SA “f a18uy ‘yo00R0g 8061 North Carolina # In the Superior Court, Iredell County. # Angie J, Peacock # vs, ” Affidavit for Publication, Jno..L..Peacock * Geo, N, Nicholson, of counsel for, the plaintiff being duly sworn says that in the above entitled action now pend- ing in@ the Superior Court. of Iredell County, the sheriff of said county has returned io ia issued to hin in said action endorsed “Jno, L. Peacock is not to be found in Iredell County’ that the defendant therein. cannot after due dilligence be found within the State; that a cause of action exists against the defendant in favor of the plaintiff as fol- Lowst-an action for divorces from the. bonds.of matrimony, Wherefore, the plaintiff prays that an order be made by the Court that service of summpms be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina, That it will be necessary also to take certain) depositions of non-resident witnesses in said action, and the Plaintiff prays also that servies of the notice to take said depositions may be nis Gog for ten days as re- Ale Dhoh gl foc quired by statute, —— Sworn to and subscribed before ffiant, el me this the 350th _ dav of May }908, oe KO Mtl Meelarel (typ Superior Court, Oo / , Order of Publication, It appearing from the affidavit of Geo, B, Nicholson, attorney for the plaintiff, that Jno. L. Peacock the defendant therein, is not to be found in Iredell County, and cannot after due dilligence be found in the State, and it further anpearing that the plaintiff has a cause of action against “J uyor ‘yD00Reg ‘SA ‘f oIBUY ‘yOOOREg 8061 syHomtusast ‘to ebnod eds mort eot)evih tot sHebneteb end ed mofios ait Io eoltton tadd betebto esoterédsd et 3TI hedetfdua tecsqewen a at exeoew avot rot aAeew & 6oOnD hedetiducd eis to elstd ent detot amstamk catiies evimuod IfeberI nt ds aniivivpes bas emaa efits eaoouwe Silt. ,mottos LfehexI to tayo0 totteau ON ko Ortes ef? ta 7 ; ft. - . +p ‘ . nM ot Xe Pe . t Pm mf yabnol sel ert exoted vs ostG § mo bfed ec téwenms bis ,virurod bise DOSTEeLoto Té6qacawert entoe [leberl ae : NS i. SN PSR NT RN errs. ienatpastnaareenaghaitacainne tana binstine ties ap onhaanicdn inal aa tnetnidheceteneitees -?%y00 xvolkreqne xit6eLd "T Wyor yooseag ‘SA “f o13UY ‘yoooReg 8061 North Carolina # In the Superior Court, Iredell County # August Term 1908. Angie J. Peacock, Plaintiff, tt -—versus— + Complaint. Jno, L. Peacock, Defendant. # The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges:— -First—- That the plaintiff and the defendant intermarried in Iredell County, on or about the 16th day of August 1909, and ever since said time have been and now are husband and wife. -~Second— That about four years ago the defendant willfully and without cause abandoned the plaintiff and departed from the State of North Carolina, and has contimiously since said time lived separate ‘and apart from the plaintiff and has contributed nothing to her support or to the support of the children of said marriage. -Third— That for something like three years before the defend— ant thus abandoned ‘plaintiff, his treatment of her was ex- tremely cruel; that his cruel treatment of her rendered her condition intolerable and her life burdensome, -—Fourth= That since the defendant thus abandoned plaintiff and has been living separate and apart from her, she is informed L444 and so e288 that the Wee Sete ce dtd commit and Biipnil Wishy Asrd tier. ~Auni xinikikaxry fornication and adultery; that he has been living in adultery; that he has thus without cause separated him-— self from the plaintiff and has lived in adultery. -~Fifth— That the issue of said marriage consists of two chil- "T Wyor “yoooeag 8061 - ‘SA ‘f o13uy ‘yooorag dren, Zeno Ernest Peacock, aged seven years, and Lottie Leola Peacock, aged three years; that these children are now in the custody and care of their mother the Plaintiff; that the de-— fendant is not a fit or proper person to be awarded the cus— tody of said children, Wherefore, the plaintiff prays that a decree be enbered difpolving the bonds of na trapon now existing betwoent the: pleinti ts, cand defendant and that, the plaintiff be granted ‘an absolute divorce rom the sePenidant; that the plaintiff be. awardd the custody of said’ ie other ‘on’ ‘further relief. .ag in_jaw pif for the fe entitled to recover, Angie J, Peacock being duly sworn says that the facts set forth in the complaint are true to the best of affiant's knowledge and belief, and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between husband and wife; not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint, as grounds for divorce, have existed to her knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this complaints; that the complainant has been a resident of the State of North Caro- lina for two years next preceding the filing 3 this com—- Dlaint,. x Borys) Sworn to and subscribed before me | + i : Sent “ t PY fs MoTaugh1 fn &Nichotgon 4 {ord ne oO Attarne}s for Plgintirr, Peacock, Angie J. vs. Peacock, John L. 1908 “TJ uyor yooorag ‘SA “f o13uy ‘yoooReg 8061 ASBURY PARK, N. J....-.; P. O. BOX 995 TELEPHONE 119 M Bre deess elena 0 Ae whom To EDWARD C. WYCKOFF. DR. ATTORNEY-AT-LAW ROOM 6, CLAYTON BUILDING 620-22 COOKMAN AVENUE “+ cechbrewee fF eerie Yreechee Arm fo Frm a Ae int fe Gree - agg, eon cheleg “T uyor *yD00Rag ‘SA “f a13uy ‘yooorag 8061 Subscription) NORTE GAROLINA. | Tn the Superior Court Gusta ean Jno. L. Peacock. Action ' The efendant above Pea cock. will notice that. Six MONTHS, been commenced Superior County by the | tor named p tif Pee J. A, Clerk Superior McLa f a : | Jeet ae Nicholson, Att’ys. for Plain; P- R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR. =| LANDMARK = = Y l O Halewile, NC. Ft. “T uyor ‘yD00R—ag ‘SA “f aI8uy ‘yooorag 8061 Sfstssiiilé, MN 6. PX 1 O MX Fb \VartInn, Ver. $$. oe TO NON-RESIDENT, — k mats ; Subscription NSN” | in the Superior Court: LA N D MI A F2 K Dr. toe for died, Peacock vs, Ino. L. Peacock. Action } ONE Year, ie, defendant above named, Jno, 1.. Peacock, SIx MonTHs, fin been consent, acon enti R. R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR. THREE MONTE o i pat | dell county dant NICE-A-WeEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. a id « g A { / thot ly 28 BRT q 5 ef lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ] Wyor *yD00R—4q ‘SA 'f a18uy “yooorag 8061 Seatosile, MCP A. | on wipuenmbisetinsciniesesisciai eas a MX FR, Og ———-- $F noricnae NON-RESIDENT, | NORTH CAROLINA.) In the Superior Court: Subscription] N' Iredell Counter . for divorce, ONE YEAR, The defendant above named, Jno, L, will take notice that an acti Six MONTHS, has been comm, dell county by THREE MONT yoree-#rom the pe Jersey, on Monday, commencing at 10 o'clock, a, = and continuing | to from time to time until comp) 5 read evidence by the Plaintiff upon the trial of said ac. - | thon. J. A. HARTNESS Clerk Sy McLaughlin & Nicholson, Att’ys, June 1, 1908, : eesti Fe nc cch ts inty. ngie J. Peacock vs, Jno. L. Peacock, Action in perior Court. for Plaintiff. _LANDMARK >. R. R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR. NICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. rol o 0 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally "] 4yor ‘yD00Rag ‘SA “f a1duy “yo0oReg 8061 Seatuvidl, MEF A,10 rene M Fe\Vartiny Lea ———+ FF noncns NON-RESIDENT. / NORTH CAROLINA. } In the Superior Court; Subscription! N Iredell County, A J. Peacock vs, Jno. L. Peacock, Action ~~ | for divorce, ONE YEAR, The defendant above will take notice that Six MONTHs, has been comm. dell county THREE MONTbvorce from the Jersey, on Monday, commencing at 10 9’ from time to time u: red, to be in| read evidence by the plai trial of said ac- tion. - A. HARTNESS, | Clerk Superior Court. McLaughl Nicholson, Att’ys. for Plaintiff. ¢c in & June 1, 1908, LANDMARK - R. R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR. ['CEA-Ween: TUESDAY AND FRIDaAY. EF b-¢ f ' p lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally "T Wyor “yooorag ‘SA ‘f oI3UY ‘yOOOREg 8061 Salesville, NC G44 10 M Peart CLL» One vea A BP NS ; 2 ca R. R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR. Six MonTHe, THREE Mont ICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. Vad Uitte s- 190 ¢ ADVERTISING RATES FURNISHED ON APPLICATION = | oe 3 *) D ? Wsni new DD@4 3! “ Peacock, Angie J. vs, Peacock, John L: 1908 "T Wyor “yD008%ag ‘SA “f a1Buy ‘yoooRag 8061 = Commission to Take Deposition.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. NORTH CAROLINA, In the Superior Court. ... COUNTY. wn GREETING: We, reposing special trust and confidence in your integrity, do authorize and empower you to cause Claude J, Albea to appear before you at such time and place as you may appoint, and him to examine touching all such matters and things as he shall know of concerning a certain matter of controversy in our Superior C ourt for the County of tredetl pending, wherein. Angie J, Peacock ...... plaintiff and. Jno. L. Peacock defendant. And the deposition in writing, by you so taken, the same to transmit, sealed with your seal, to our Superior Court, to be held for said County, on the... Said day of. November | 1908+ ° Witness J..A , Clerk of said Court, at office Statesville, *T Qn f + oOy+} County, + Yes SUB. RTtDe, 1905, LOH ame in Iredell “T Wyor “yoooeag ‘SA “f aI8uy ‘yooorag 8061 North Carolina In the Superior Gourt. Iredell County Angie J. Peacock vs : Jno, Ge. Froeacock Pursuant to the annexed commission to me directed, I, Edwsrd C. Wyckoff, commissioner, under the authority there of, on the tenth day of September, 1908, at 10 o'clock A.™é., at my office in the Seacoust Bank Buiiding, in the City of Asbury Park, in the County of Monmouth, State of New Jersey, neither party being present, proceeded to take the deposition of mote joyove , who being first duly sworn to speagk the truth between the said plaintiff and defendant, deposes and says: 1. What is your name, age, residence and occupation? Ans. Claude J. Albea, twenty four years old, Belmar, N.J. running vegetable wagon and farming is my present occupation. 2. Are you personally acquainted with John 1... Peacock, the defendant in this action? Ans, Yes sir, 3. How long have you known him? Ans. I have known him now for nine or ten years. 4. Do you know his general character? Ans. Yes sir, 5. What is it, good or bad? Ans. Good but he likes the women, 6. What is his general character, if you know, for moral- ity and virtue ? Ans, It has not been so good part of the time and part of the time it has, 7. State whether or not you have any knowledge relative to his having committed fornication and adultery or relative to 3 Bs A a a ghee : aie aa "J Wyor “yD008—ag ‘SA “[ a1BUy ‘yoooRsg 8061 i \ Peacock vs Peacock (2) his having lived in fornication and adultery ? Yes, I have known him to, 8. State in detail all you know concerning same, Ans. My first knowledge was when John L. Peacock was staying with the Pierce's on the H.C.Gaither farm near Harmony North Carolina in January and Febuary A.D. 1907, On three or four different Sundays I seen them out in the woods having actual connection with each other in my presence. By them I mean John L. Peacock and Lil Pierce, Lil Pierce is the daughter of the Mrs Pierce with whom Peacock boarded at the Gaither farm and was about twenty eight or thirty years old I think. She has been married. I do not know wek® whether her husband is dead or living away from her, She claims to be married, I understand that they were living together during the time he boarded at Pierce's and that he would get what he wanted whenever he wanted it. I have seen them go upstairs together in the house during the day time on several occasions when I was at the house, I have seen him have intercourse on several ae occasiona with Mary Jones at the Belmar Fishery at Belmar N.J, The first time was in June 1908 when they came in together to the room where he and I slept about nine o'clock and did not lose much time in going to bed together and I saw them having con- nection while in the bed. They both undressed and she went away about four o'clock in the morning. The first time was in the early in the week in the first part of June and this same performance took place three different nights the same week, I would see them together three or four different times the same night. On all these occassion I was sleeping in the same room they was. I was sleeping and eating at the Fishery at the time and was out of work, In my knowledge Peacock habitually and continually surpendéred to his *ese lusts and lived in adultery with other women than his wife. “J wyor ‘yD008eg ‘SA ‘f a18uy “yoooreg 8061 \ \ Peacock vs’ Peacock (3) 9 With whom has he committed fornication and adultery, and when ? Give her name, Ans, With Mary Jones and Lil Pierce as above stated, 10. During what period of time has said cohabiting together of the defendant and said woman continued? Witness must give in detail all the facts and circumstances surrounding the same, Ans. With Lil Pierce for a period of about six weeks to two months and with Mary Jones for a period of about one week, He lived with the Pierce woman at her home for ahout two months and with the Jones woman at his place of boarding as above stated. Lak § be a The foregoing deposition of Claude J. Albea was sworn to and subscribed before me at the time and place mentioned above. This tenth day of September, 1908. 2 Aumd CA Commissioner, “T uyor “‘yoooveg ‘SA 'f o13UY ‘yOOOREg 8061 P. O. BOX 995 | TELEPHONE !!9 ASBURY PARK, N. J... to EDWARD C. WYCKOFF. DR. ATTORNEY-AT-LAW ROOM 6, CLAYTON BUILDING 620-22 COOKMAN AVENUE i oO pet) QO ° QO Yr — = e ru oO & i) ° Q a = * bl < aw 8061 J. B. ROBESON } STATESVILLE, N. TO THE MASCO ROBESON & NOR The Evening Mascot Dally Except Sunday WOOD, LESSEES The Ired Monday ___T8Yor “yo0ovag SA “f alduy ‘yo00Reg 8061 Geta Bru i J.B. ROBESON STATESVILLE, N. C.- Ais! ei ee YT mchsles — = ty pon he Ace TO THE MASCOT PUBLISHING & NORWOOD, LESSEES The Ired@ ROBESON Monday The Evening Mascot Daily Except Sunday dl se eae 08 if SoACOOK: By 7 McLaughlin & Wicholson, Attys | : od uyor “yoo0oRag SA ‘f a13uy ‘yOooROg 8061 —_— Oct aH 1 = J.B. ROBESON STATESVILLE, N. C. THE MASCOT PUBLISHING SON & NORWOOD, LESSEES TO =—— The Ired@ ROBE Monday The Evening Mascot Dally Except Sunday ee a. -\ In the Superior tf Court. - ne . AF VAIS AA BF “Cho Mls. wed — ve ee © 4 . c ¥ ot sptember, 1908, ! at 10°o’clock a. m., and nage from day to day. until; te, said deposition to be read | as evidence for the plaintiff in the | ‘above entitled action now nding in| the Superior Court ofjiredell county, North Carolina. ©: Seo This August 27, 1908. - i frien “ ANGIE J. PEACOCK. By McLaughlin & Nicholson, Attys J.B. ROBESON ee Ww. ©. TO THE nee t aaeaall GF SON & NORWOOD, LESSE ES The Ired Monday ROBE "T Wyo ‘yD00Rag “SA t a1suy ‘yooorag The Evening Mascot Dally except Sunday 8061 ~ — a - = North Carotina, Jn the Superior TredelACounity . Court. - To at Above Named: e notice that the undersigned wi 6 the deposition of Claude J. Albéaj, before Edward ©. Wyckoff, — at his office in Asbury Park, in the Seacost Bank Building, , ongthe h day of September, 1908, ” commencing at 10°o’clock a. m., and continuing from day to day ‘until: - ete, said deposition to be | idence for the plaintiff in the | abdre entitled action now pending in / the Superior Court of; Iredell county, North Carolina. This ‘August 27, 1908. ANGIB J. PEACOCK. By McLaughlin & Nicholson, Attys ——— “T uyor “yooorag ‘SA ‘f o13uy ‘yD00R—g 8061 » VANCE NORWOOD J.B. ROBESON ; STATESVILLE, N. C. Gety Gr —} — 1905 ciate L0 THE MASCOT PUBLISHING CO PB ROBESON & NORWOOD, LESSEES The Evening Mascot The Iredell County Mascot Daily Except Sunday Mondaysand Thursdays Peacock, Angie J. vs, Peacock, John L. 1908 “T yor ‘yD0080g ‘SA “f oI3uy ‘yOooReg 8061 Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as the complaint? : i ; . Meat Me firacubgy Usa % Medel a4 wee (GQ fw Iyeers afece Coo _ Cnunernrerncut 4K lit a2lige, 7 Giitiior ~yper othe fife OIA SALI masccne NTE eH PRS 88 + on c c oa & © © rolina # This cause fo North C: Peacock, Angie J. vs, Peacock, John L. 1908 Peacock, Angie J. vs, Peacock, John L. 1908 "J Wyor “yooorag ‘SA “f o18uy ‘yo0oREg 8061 eee vere gn ee eerie Ce etree ts nna tH een tr see Wma teeth anmemnesesmereer gerne Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Prirted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT . County. dug.a Y Groobd, Against Y Aphe Rerdep Judgment Against Original Summons, or other original process, including all names therein Every copy of same.... Bond, including J Pe Appeal from Clerk to Judge. Order for enlarging time of pleading... Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond and and Justification.... Order of Arrest. Subpoena, each name........cceccccces cesses > ifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian... .. Continuance Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing. Issuing Commission 7 5 MAfiidavit, including Jurat and Certificateo> Mel bo4., fetter 95 -25 -25 25 Notice, for each name over one in same paper -10 Impaneling Jury 10 Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided .50 Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support. Docketing same Docketing ex parte Proceedings fo Judgment. oe eae = Summons County Tax, when Jury impaneled Referee’s Allowance. Magistratd Bec Rs Plaintiff's Witnesses CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS-CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) Peacock, Angie J. vs, Peacock, John L. 1908 ..County.-- In the Superior Court. rd SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. To the Sheriff of = Beara _County—GREETING: Dou are hereby Copmtgrtded to epee ey ji +e ae (pexy’) - Monday of! the ‘sathé being: the lb? a day of Lo gZ. bana’ answer the ae a copy of which willite déposited in the office of the Clerkf the Superior Couitt'for ‘said County; % 9 J tegeszot said: Term; and let said: Defendant:\..,také tiotice if “they fail to answer'to the said’ complaint »«will apply-to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint.-------------- Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due\ return. @ | ! sm Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this_.o7 haan, within that time, the: plaintiff 4 / aruut A ‘Sdjaqd ‘say “1 ‘sdjoud 7161 ke + “yO AInN0D sopredng 243 Jo Po aQVarmnyzay ir) aoe oH ; i) OG | Ve ty 4, 7 eet oer coset ae / FP? I IVOV : ep oP rs 131139 W0d SNOWWAS wet > ee Asu10}jYy S.yHArelg ‘ky YAW 7 as srroerectnrreeey Qc rrrrrrrrrrrrnnrrnrnccnessee ig, Raper ST SOT BIOJOQ poqrosqns pue 0} UIOMS *suOT}NDexa9 mi0I13 ydutexe Aj1adoid pue sarjztIqet] ‘s}qep sty sAoge pu I9A0 yons [Ie eas SEO OOS Oo eae JO Wins 34} Ur ‘noTZDB SIq} UT yaepusjeq 343 0JUN pUNog SeAlasIno aspe;MouyoE 9M, *yINOD JoledNg 34} Ul \ *‘¥NISIONYO HLYUON JO AL¥LS oruut A “Sdjayd ‘sa “W "| ‘Sayed 7161 oruut A, ‘sdjo4d ‘say ‘[ ‘sdjodd 7161 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County day Term 1912. I. A. Phelps vs Comphaint. Vinnie Phelps The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges and says; lst. That the plaintiff is now and was at the times hereinafter mentioned a citizen of the State of North Carolina. 20.6 That on the 24th day of December, 18904, the plaintiff and the aefendant intermarried according to the MA nhe LkK< laws of the State of North Cerolina, and have been ahd are “4 ark, now HUGNSRE Hite» Od. That on or about the day of June, 1908, the defendant wilfully and without any cause upon the part of the plaintiff, ana for the purpose as this plaintirr d¢stutetbtdbitse?e is informea and believes, of satisfping the lusts of the flesh abandoned the plaintiff ana ceased to live with him as his lawful wife. That since said abanaonment upon the part of the defendant saia defendant has committed adultery with various and sundry persons to the plaintif unknown, as this plaintiff is informea end believes, and has for some time prior to the bringing of this action, to-wit for about one year, been living in aaultery with one Sam Paschal. Wherefore the plaintiff prays that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the aefendant Oe ee Pe, ap Leth TMA aipityin ry OD & 8. Pe ie a BP ® § 7161 North Carolina Iredell County i I. A. Phelps being duly sworn, deposes and says; facts set forth in the that the foregoing complaint asetrue of his own knowledge except as to those mateers therein stated upon information ana belief and as to thosexmatters he believes it to be true; that said complaint is not made of levity or by collusion of the husband and wife, and it is not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the comp aint have existea to the knowleage of the plaintiff for more than six months prior to the filing of this complaint; anda that saia plaintiff has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceeding the tiling of this complaint. oF Ass Vid fee Sworn to and subscribea to before me this the 20th day of ve Mich ater e co j +—- aan _——~ Ca. Phelps, I. A. vs. Phelps, Vinnie 1912 Be = (dist J. Pie. Zo- Th oquut, ‘Sdjaqd ‘sa "Y “1 ‘sdjoud 7161 Phelps, I. A. vs. Phelps, Vinnie 1912 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term 1912. I. A. Phelps vs Judgment Vinnie Phepps %e_. 4 This cause coming on to be heard before His,Honor, H. P. Lane, Judge Presiding, ana a jury at the May Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and the jury having answerea the issues as follows; lst. Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as allegea in the complaint? Ans. Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resiaent of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceaing the bringing of this action? Ans. Yes. 4. Did the defendant commit adultery as allegea in the complaint? Ans. Yes. It is therefore considered and adjudagea by the court that the bonas of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff ana the aefendant be ana the same are hereby dissolved ana annullea. Lh y 7) . Judge Presiaing. oruut A ‘sdjaqd ‘sA “WY ‘| ‘Sdjadd 7161 Phelps, I. A. vs. Phelps, Vinnie 1912 SUMIIONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Sy ee: jo County.--9n the Superior Court. uYyor “JazIYd ‘SA OUT]OIeD “Jay S061 ae MONS FOR RELIEF. 7 ange : State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of : x County—GREETING : Wou are Hereby Commanded to Summon Y phe. Ebas the same being the wD: — nae Revcceeseneseeeee QM answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior“Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendunt take notice if fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff.......... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this Court uYyor “saztyg “SA sUT[OIeD “IayIyg $061 ‘o8eoTtW : 5 paaAles DATOOIY 4 JO jINOZ frouiedng ey} jo 0} afqeuinjyey f | ~~ AAVHY Ot SNOWWDS “AdUIOWY SBuUreylg soos fo App > 814g aus adofag pagiasqns pun 03 uLoMs ‘suoignoaxa wodf yduaxa fijzsadoad pun $a1z1719n1) ‘s}gap Sty anogn pun 4ano sanyjop pazpuny om} yo wns ay} yz4om s1 ay shins usoms Buiaq ~puafag ay} $b 4809 Yyans 11D ayy {1 ‘danamoy ‘pron aq 03 ‘sanzj0q ' Jo wins ay} ut ‘uoNjoD sty, ur yuDpuafog ay} f ojun punog sanjas.ino abpaymouyan a “ALNNOD ~ *y4noy so14adng ay? uy 1 “YNITONVOD HLYNON SAO SALYLS uYyor “TazIYd ‘SA OUT]OIeD “IazTYg S061 North Carolina;: In the Supefior Court -. Iredell County:: Jauuary Sern - ,1905. Caroline Phifer : vs. : Complaint. - John Phifer: The plaintiff ,Caroline Phifer,complains and alleges’: First - That in the year 188-,some seventeen or eighteen years ago Ou the -, day of September ~ the defendant John Phifer intermarried with the plaintiff Caroline Phifer according to law,and thence forward from that time until the vresent time the iarriage rélaRion has existed between the said parties. - : Second - That during the year 1899 on the - day of Jnly,the defendant ; Without cause ‘ ; ; : wilead ly Sbehgut § the Said Caroline, Phi er his wité,in the city, of). Salisbury,N.C. and is now, aud his at all tiees Coase the said -. day of July,1899 lived Seperate and apart from his said wife , Caroline Phifer. Wherefore the Plaintiff hereby makes apllication to the Gourt =. That tne Court geant an onder divorcing the said Caroline Phifer row ler Said husband,John Phifer because of abandonment of his said wife aua for suca other and further relicf aS the Court may deew the said Plaintiff to be Entitled. - 7 on : e Vy C. - 2 es Attorney for Plai Girt. Caroline Phifer after oéing sworn deposes and SayS,that the facts Set forth in the above Complaint are true to the best of her knowledge, ioformation and belief,except as to those tatters stated on information aud belief aud as to those latters She believes it to be true -- aud that the Salle is uot wade out of levity or collusion between the said hus baud ald wife -—- aud not for the were purpose of freeing and Seépérating the said HUSVald aud wife,vut in Sincerétyx and truth for thé Cause wentioned in the ‘Complaint - that the facts have existed to the knowledge of affiant for at least Six wGutas prior to the filiag of this complaint and the said Wif€ has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for five years fiext preceding the filing of ihis ee % Fin Swori to aid Subscribed before me this the nd OS Mi 4 Mary ,1905. Eis tla. cee Otary Public for and in Iredell County,North Carolina. $061 uyor “JayYg Urpore) “Jaz Phifer, Caroline vs. Phifer, John 1905 “SA SUTTOIED “Jay ~~ i =. iY o* a F ‘oO So Ns a_f Aes ak oa h~ Lex K Ma. Che | es ae Ma 37, ada f uyor “1axIYg "SA OUTTOIeD “ayy _ ‘Oo —) Nn — i eae Rip RS SE EES CS Re Re aia pe PRR tS Stee er ea REL : Phifer, Caroline vs. Phifer, John 1905 Phifer, Mack vs. Phifer, Berta 1911 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N.C. + 3-15- 13-1M. | Sill County--In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of... Lr ehh Dou are Hereby Commanded to summon ates “JaytYd ~y =. o . E. ch a Q. < ¥ Sl6l which will be deposited in the office of the Clefk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and. let said Defendant.........take notice if. F4¢. they—failsto answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 0} d[qUuINjay LSNIVOV Stes “Joytyd AUN api yinog JoLIsd1g 34} Jo '~v > z oO s. a ER = = > =: > Fh Sg cy. o a g < vi Sl6l ee eae Aep Be Rcey uct gee st} ol s10jeq peqiiosqns pue 0} TIOMG ‘suoljnoexe Woy ydutexa Aj1ado1d pue sarjt[Iqet] ‘s}qap sty 2A0qe pue 12A0 SIe[[Op peipuny om} jo UNS 3y} 43I0M st aq shes TOMS SuIeq jUepusjag an} 0}UN puNnog sadjasino aspajmouyoe ay *Ayunod ‘JANOD soladng ay} uy *‘¥NITOUYOD HLYNON 4AO AL¥LS Phifer, Whitfield vs. Phifer, Sallie 1915 noynawer WwoL Ali and J o ats int. Phifer, Whitfield vs. Phifer, Sallie 1915 North Carolina In the Suvrerior 7T Notice 4 defendent. above named will teke notice thet an action itled »=s above has been commenced in ti 3 court of STTBS “TOY rg Sy wee @ e E te oe = < - S16! afes “saytyd ~y =. o os e. rh =, Qu. < vi Sl6l Original Summons, or names therein . Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . Order of Arrest Subpcena, each name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian ...... . Continuance Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing Issuing Commission Affidavit, including Jurat. and Certificate Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . .... . Docketing same yp keting ex parte Proceedings Judgment " Summons Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgment Execution and Sheriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2. Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when Jury impareled Referee’s Allow: Sheriff. ec “a Constable. ... . Magistrate Plaintiff’s Witnesses CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF GOSTS--CIVIL, (As Fixed by the Code.) Term, 191 Phifer, Whitfield vs. Phifer, Sallie 1915 ao 3 3 o @ jan) : 5 = Lé6I "SA “2 [OZBH ‘990I01g SUMMONS within your County, to a at the office of the Clerk of the Superior ==--day of County, on or before the return date of this summons, and let fail to answer to the said complaint within twenty days from said return date, the time prescribed by law, the plain- will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due return. Lt Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this_/.Z ___day 0 erk “Superior Court, Iredell County. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF Returnable witht SS an into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of 0jUN pUNOd SaAjesino ospazMouyoe 9A LSNIVOV Iredell County. “YNITOUVYO HLUON AO ALV.LS “uorjoR SIy} UI------YyUre[g ey} Jo JoAovor ABUI----yUBpUozoq] ay} SB 4sO0 ‘suoIjNVex9 WoAy Jdulexa Ajredoid pue setjiIqer, ‘siqop sty eAoqe pu daAO0 Ce gS ge i ee ee ee a Be ee eee Onn 22 eat *14N0Z4 1011adng ay} Uy mR 4 ° a} =} co ° ~ 5 Ru na S a DQ oO a > ® Ru a oO = ° 8 @ 5 @ co Es a ‘ ' ae 1 i iy | ° =p ! i 1 ' t. 1 ' \ ! 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 ; i I i 1 1 ! 1 1 1 I 1 — © bo ! ' 1 ' ae ae “q EMG ie ae eee men cone | en ener naira Rann Tarek ear am Aep= "7" "sy ‘sTRos pues spuey Ino ssouyrA ‘NOH Jowedng yA] Dee 04 % MANO errr nee ane rae’ enna FO We One Sh GONOe wily tr sare) ee SIB[[Op peipuny OA} JO WINS 9} YOM ST oY sABS U1OMS 1 0 ap ae ta alesis dcp hang a be oats rw Ualaceika faa ad ate achicha yons [[e@--“-----jyuepuejoq ey} Aed |eys CERT ren acres een anne eeres (‘Te9g) RR eNO SP pe NT OT tee Cr RCE eh oe ate Pierce, Hazel C. vs. Pierce, Herman H. 1927 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF—CIVIL CASES—Clerk—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. ©. AGAINST STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To the Sheriff of SP bedhette-Coiny GREETING: wv ® o = & $ rr go oC) < ~” LC6I the defendant..--above named is eee att ound within your County, perior Court for the County of_- Siccladtl<, on the..Z<_% day of and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the County, on or before the return date of this summons, and let 1 apply for the relief fail to answer to the said complaint within twenty days from said return date, the plaintiff__--wil demanded in the complaint. a Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. 1924 Given under my hand and seal of said Court, nis LY --aay of -<f-f g $32 Lt SUMMONS FOR RELIEF Returnable within.___47._# days into the LSNIVOV office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of [dq oY} Jo Taaoover AvuI-~~-~yUBpuezaq] ey} SB 4so0 ‘YNITOUVYO HLUON AO ALYLS jo Aep------stq} ‘sTees pue spuey ano ssouzt A *AquNn0*) ‘smoTjnoexed wWorz ydwose Aj19doad pue sorjzipiqer, ‘s}qep SITY eAOqe puB 12AO ‘uor}oR sIy} W\~~~---yyUr JNO 41011adNg ay} U] : Plaintiff’s Attorney. M 3 ° 5 6 oe °o 9 5 Qu n Ss o B o 5 ee a ® Qa a ® > o 5s o B @ ct So ee na ' ' i ' ' 1 Qu & eq ° = ‘ ' i \ i ' i 1 ' i ' 1 1 i 1 ! i 1 1 r 1 ' i ' ' ' ' 1 ' i i ' 1 1 1 ' i —_ © < 1 ‘RAE at ee ee a eee ee “DIOA 04 0}: ‘BXETOGE ST corr rena crete oe saetenr ee 0S OTR Ol OMOe Mis Mb ee ep eeeeL ims meee ae mentee ie baie heeie Aneel es Ree ren ee ee a Ae inne or OA DUI WAATIRAOO, Gupe ta tenoN AN, cone ie" ee A hee Teg ee ee ae ‘JOAVMOY sie]jop perpuny OM Jo Wns oy} YIAOM st oY Shes UAOMS Sutoq™ ~*~ Pierce, Hazel C. vs. Pierce, Herman H. 1927 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF—CIVIL CASES—Clerk—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C. ae Pade. -_County—In the Superior Coutt. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF at a = & jen) : 3 = "SA “2 [9ZBH ‘90191 Lé6l County, on or before the return date of this summons, and let fail to answer to. the said complaint within twenty days from said return date, the plaintiff----will apply for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this pA._day of LD f 4 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF days into the LSNIVOV office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of 4 “County. recive We, 2 (ZL 1927 — qs 22 rl, I2Z ‘YNITOUYO HLUON AO ALYLS a Ayzedord pue sorjipiqery ‘s}qop Sty eAOqe pue JeAO *Aquno’7) | | *24n04y A01adng ay) UT : “UOT}OB SI} Ul--~-~-YIyUIV[g ey} Jo Jaaoover AvUI-~-~~juspusyeq ey} Se soo *‘sUOT]NIEXe Woy Jury Vi ee LLCO. Meh ac Plaintiff’s Attorney. mM 3 S 5 5 + ° © 3 Ru 2 Ss a 2 ° 4 rs a @o Qu a ® ep ° 3 @ B © et S ee n 1 ' 1 1 1 1 Qs © & °o eh ' t ' 1 1 ! i 1 ' ' ! 1 ' ' ' : ' ' i ! ' ' ' ' 1 ' 1 ' ' ! ' ! ' ' ' ' ' _ =) bo ' ' eRe ea = Ee ute ee og yee eoLEe hn eens hae AgD>”"""" sig) ‘s[Bas pues spuely{, ano ssoujylA WA Od OL “Rawle rent arent 6 ene Oy a oes Sly Seen or Rash nnn see eaa te enna sm mmm mninemen anes namedhcnconer ee CU DUnOd SOAjeeIne SRpelmounee 8h oe tet OG BE eg ree ee eee ee Jt ‘19AoM0Y SIB]JOp Perpuny OM} Jo UNS 94} Y}AOM st OY SABS UIOMS ZUIOG (‘1e9g) Pierce, Hazel C. vs. Pierce, Herman H. are) a 3 oP a FF 2 3 o. pa) 5 m< n Lc6I ‘ - North carolina | Iredell County | In the Superior Court. Before the Clerk. Mrs Hazel Pierce, | TASTMEIS TE = Win COM PLA Tae } H. H. Pierce, Defendant, The @laintiff complaining of the Defendant} alledges and says: 1 That the above named Plaintiff,Mrs Hazel Pierce is now and has been at all times for more than two years prior to the begginning of this action, a bona fide resident and citizen of the State of North Carolina. 2 That the Plaintiff, Mrs Hazel Pierce and the Defendant H. H. Pierce were married and intermarried one with the other on or about the blank day of 19 «, which married relations has existed at all times since the said date of their said marriage, and that they are now man and wife. 3 That on or about /& day fab 1928, the Defendant H. H. Pierce abandoned the Plaintfff, zel Pierce and their infant child, born to said wedlock leaving said Plaintiff, Hazel Pierce and the said infant chili ae “4A7E¢ and the said H. H. Pierce at said time of said abanfonmeft attempted to marry another woman Miss /9é/le SlewArYT of Avery County, North Carolina and did go through with the formal marriage ceremony ane ae n and there and thereafter take up with the said Miss and did live with her as his wife, the said Miss @2éde S2#gn1) then and there sincerely believing that she was lawfully married to the said H, H. Pierce and that the said H. H. Pierce and the said Miss4#@eclee did live and cohabit together for a period ot § mopgAce ond more, having ixwkerew sectual intercourse one with the other just as man and wife during all of said period which they lived together and as a result of the said cohabitatio d etual intercourse a child was born to the said Miss and H. H. Pierce and by all of which unlawful conduct the said H. H. Pierce and the said Miss haggis commit the crime, and unlawful act of fornication and adultery. 4 That the facts herein contained, set forth as a complaint has exhisted to the knowledge of the Plaintiff for six months next preceeding the institution of this action. VHIREFORE, the Plaintiff Hazel Pierce prays the Court 1. That the bonds of matrimony now eithisting between herself and the defendant H. H. Pierce be disolved absolute, and that the Plaintiff Hazel Pierce be granted an absolute divorce from the said Defendant H. H. Pierce. 2. That the Plaintiff herein Hazel Pierce be allowed granted and ordered by this Court the custody and control of who is an issue of the Plaintiff and the lefendant by their said marriage all as above alledged,and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. This the 22 day of March 1927. Sworn and subscribed to before me this the 22 day of Mi ZA yp Cle : Superior Court. PlainViff "H UPULID} ‘99101g ‘SA "2 [9ZBH “0Ja1g Lé6l North Carolina | In the Superior Court. Iredell County } Before the Clerk. Mrs Hazel Pierce, Plaintiff -vs- AFFIDAVIT. H. H. Pierce, Defendant, J J J j J J J ! Mrs Hazel Pierce , after being duly sworn deposes and says,that the facts set forthe in the foregoing complaint are true of her own knowledge, except as to matters and things therein stated upon information and belief, and as th those matters and things, she believes them to be tmme; that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between the plaintiff and the defendant, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincereaty and truth, for the cause named in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint; that the cause set forth in the complaint have existed fof more than six (6) months prior to the filing of this complaint, that the Plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina fof more than two years next preceeding the filing of this complaint. Phne fos oh : — : | Seana Pierce, Hazel C. vs. Pierce, Herman H. 1927 North Carolina J Int the Superior Court Iredell County |! Before the Clerk. Mrs Hazel Pierce Plaintiff ORLER OF PUBLICATION. H. Hs Pierce, befendant, } } i -vVs- i { | | It appearing from the affidavit of Mrs Hazel Pierce plaintiff in the above entitled action that H. H. Pierce the defendant is not to be found in Iredell County and cannot, after due diligence be found within the State, and it further appearing f from the affidavit of the plaintiff filed in this action, that 4 cause of action exists against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff for divorce absolute. NOW, THEREFORE, it is order that summons be served on the said defendant, H. H. Pierce by publication thereof once & week for four (4) consecutive weeks in the Statesville Deily a newspaper published at Statesville, Iredell County, N. C. set- ting forth the title of the action and’ te -purpose of same and requiring the defendant appear at the office of the Clerk of the superior Court of Iredell County, N. C. on the-23 day of April 1927 and answer or demur to the complaint in said action which complaint will then and there be filed in the office of said Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N. €.,: or the plaintiff will apply for the relief (demanded in the above en- titled action. ~~ Oo Oo = 8 $ Ba ph @ a8 m 0) i < ”n Dated this the 22 day of March 1927. Le6I erk superior Court. ao a @ ° s ae : 3 = Lt6l ‘SA "2 [ezeH ‘s0I01g North Carolina f In the Superior Court Iredell County} Before the Clerk. lirs Hazel Yrierce, | Plaintiff, J J -VS- j j H.. Hy .Pierce, befendant, } Mrs Hazel Pierce being duly sworn deposes and says; that she is the Plaintiff in the above entitled action; that in the above entitled action ngw pending in the superior Court of Iredell County, N. C. the sherif*¥eof ‘satid county has returned the summons issued to him in said action. endorsed "Search and inquiry made and the defendant not to be found in Iredell County, and his whereabouts unknown. This affiant further avers that the defendant there- in cannot after due diligence be found within the State; that a cause of action existing against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff as follows : That on account of the acts of adultry on the part of the defendant with one liiss , the Plaintiff in this action is entitled to an absolute divorce from the defendant and a severance of the bonds of matrimony now existing between the Plaintiff and the Defendant. WHEREFORE, the PRaintiff prays that an order be made by the Court that service of summons be made on the defendant by publication thereof in some newspaper published in Iredell County, N. C. as is prescribed by law in such cases. Dated this the 22 day of larch 1927. Plaint iy. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 22 g oF#7 1 lérk superior Court. a = rv a £ ny re) : m3 = Lé6l ‘SA "2D [eZzeH ‘s0I01g Original. 2&8 V. LONG SOLICITOR (STH JUDICIAL DISTRICT cumaae Sage get ATION TAK SPECIALIST LONG & GLOVER ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROOMS 11 AND 12 PEOPLES BANK BUILDING STATESVILLE, - N.C. North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Before the Clerk. Mrs. Hazel Pierce, Plaintaff, NOTICE OF SERVICE OF SUMUONS BY PUBLICATION VS. H.H.Pierce, Defendant. he Defendant above named, H.H.Pierce,will take notice hereby that an action entitled as above waS commenced in the Superior Court of Ired ell County, N.C., on the 2lst., day of March,A.bD.,1927,for the purpos of dis-solving absolute , the bonds of Matrimony now-existing between the abe ove named Plaintiff, Hazel tierce, and the above named Defendant, H.H.Pierce, ounds of Fornication and adultry on the part of the defendant, H.H.Pie on tne gr before the Clerk of tk Pierce; That the *ummons in said action is returnable of lredelli County, N.C.,on the 23rd., day of April, A.D.1927. Superior Court and answer when and where the defendant, H.H-Pierce, is required to appear or demure to the Complaint, or the Plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the Complaint. This the 22nd.,day of MARCH, A.D., 1927. JeAeHartness, ©.5.C, of Ire ell CO., N.C. : "uo TZ BOTT qQuT £q suommg fo eoTzZoN Pierce, Hazel C. vs. Pierce, Herman H. 1927 a Qa = Q o e : 3 = Le6l ‘SA “2 JezeY ‘o0I0Ig Price ONE YEAR $6.00 SIX MONTHS 3.00 ONE MONTH -50 SINGLE COPY .08 Month|}1 | 2|3 | 4 Jan. Per Feb. arene Mar. A Ma STATESVILLE, N. C To THES STATESVILLE DAILY °® | joverramc ‘PEGRAM A. BRYANT, PROPRIETOR eee PUBLISHED EVERY-WEEK.DAY 6}7]8 |9 }10 |} 11) 12} 13} 14) 15} 16] 17} 18} 19} 20 | 21} 22} 23) 24) 95} 26 e d| befpr reg * r| 0 ang oo's oo'ss REDELL —— I 1 the rior Court, ee a Before the =. NORTH CAROLINA, ii ne COUNTY ° 'N ‘SATHASSLVLS ramenced | in * the County, N. C., on oa ist ¢-D.; 1927, for the purpose lute, the bonds- of Matri- mony ‘now e & between the above named Pi ot Pics and the above nam ‘endant, Hy H. Pierce, on the grounds jon and fe, on the’ part: of: , hat ‘the Summons le before the “Clerk t f Sredell County, N- , ae Sey of April, A. D,, . 1927, when ‘and: where the defendant, a is required to and answer or demur appear to. the Comptalnt, or the Pinintift will apply He the rome for the relief demanded in ‘the ae co aad, day of March,: a D., 1927. Hertness, C. 8. C., of ire- |: ny det Peonety: N.C tas & Glover, Attys.s for Plaintiff. Mar. 22-29 Apr. 5-12-D | woLaidod d ‘LNWAUS ‘VW WVHDSd. ua ATIVG ATVILASHLV.LS WAL o 92 |gz |F3 |€3 |33 |TS | 03 |6T | ST | LT |9T | ST) FT So *U Qo o - 8 § at SB 3 0 5 mC) m< wn Lc6l NOLLVOIIddv NO G3HSINUN4 ONISILYSAGV AdOD 2 DNIS HLINOW 3NO— SHLNOW XIs | WORTH CAROLINA, ne TREDELL COUNTY: ——— In the Superior ‘Court, i : Before the Clerk. Mrs, Hazel Pierce, Plaintift, ons By Publication “phe Defendant. aboy H. H. Pierce, ae rove notice hereby that an action entitled \ ga above was commenced in the. Superior | Gourt of Tredell County, N. CG. on the 21st ay of March, A: D., 1927, for. the purpose of. dissolving \ absolute, the bonds. of Matri- mony now existing between the above named Plaintiff, Hazel Pierce, and the above named Defendant, H, H. Pierce, on the grounds of fornication and adultery on the part, of the defendant, H. H. Pierce; That the Summons in said action. is yeturnable before the Clerk of the Superior Court. of Iredell County, N- C.;. on ‘the oard dxy of April, As Dy, TAG when and where the defendant, H. H. Pierce, js required to appear and answer or demur to the Complaint, or the Plaintiff) will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the Complaint... ‘ This the 22nd day of March, A. Th, 1927. 5. A. Hertness, C. S. C., of ‘Ire- vOLaIddOw gd ‘LNVAUE ‘VW NVUDSd aa ATVIVG ATVILASULV.LS HHL ot 2 ‘N ‘3 THASSLVLS 92 |c@ Fa |€2 [3s |TS | 03 | 6T |ST LT |9T | ST) FT i dell County, N. C Long & Glover, Attys., for Plaintiff. Mar. 22-29° /-pr. §-12-D H ueuLisy ‘90J01g 9 ao - re Go < 3 2 m t= a qo @ _ ca oa z a ease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally AdOD ZB 1DNIS HLNOW 3NO SHLINOW XIs — —_— | WORTH CAROLINA, ? . Do 'N ‘STHUASALVLS IREDELL COUNTY: ——S In the Superior Court, ; Before the Clerk. Mrs. re Pierce, Plaintiff, 38. H.-H. Pierce, Defendant. : ‘Wotice Of Service Of Sammons By Publication The Defendar ed, H. H. Pierce, will -take notice hereby t entitled ‘as, above was commenced. in the Superior | Court of Iredell County, N. ©., on the ‘21st day of March, A D., 1927, for. the. purpose of dissolving absqlute, the bonds. of Matri- mony now existi*. between the above named Plaintitf, Hazel Pierce, and the above named Defendant, H, H. Pierce, on the grounds of Pornieation and adultery on the part, of the defendant, H. H. Pierce; That the Summons in said action is returnable before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N. C.; on the 23rd i Di, 2/182 when and where the defe js required to appear an to the Complaint, or the Plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the Complaint. + ‘ This the 22nd day of March, A. D., 1927. J. A. Hartness, C. Ss. C., of Ire | dell County, N. ©. | Long & Glover, Attys. for Plaintiff. Mar. 22-29 Apr. 5-12-D | AVG-MSSM-AUSAR GSHSIIENd yOLaiddOd d ‘LNVAUE ‘WV NVaOAad wa ATIVE WTILASULVILS WH o 92 |¢z |F3 |e2 133 |TS | 0 |6T {ST | LT |9T | ST] FT H ueuLIa} “adJ31g SA “2D [8ZeH ‘01014 2 5 ie “ Se a 2 m rena Qo = aS J Z o.° a z ease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally . AdOD ZS IONIS HLNOW 3NO SHLNOW XIs uvzA BNO oo'ss — = | NORTH CAROLINA, ) IREDELL COUNTY. — In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk. Mrs. Hazel Pierce, Plaintiff, Defendant. ice Of Sammons By Publication named; H. H. Pierce, will take notice here hat an action entitled ‘aw ‘above was _commenc the Superior jourt of Iredell County, N. C., on the 21st day of March, A: D., 1927, for the: purpose of dissolving absolute, the bonds of Matri- | mony now existing between the above named | Plaintiff, Hazel Pierce, and the above named Defendant, H. H. Pierce, on the grounds of Fornication and adultery on the part, of the defendant, H. H, Pierce; That the Summons turnable before the Clerk } in said action is re’ of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N.} on C.. on the 28rd dxy of April, A. Di, ; 1927, I: and where the defendant, H. H. Pierce, i t AVQ'-NSSM'AUSASR asHsi1end yoLsudO¥ g ‘LNVAUE ‘W WVWYDSd > ‘N ‘3 THASSLYLS wa ATIVG ATILASULVILS WHALE o 93 |SB |FS |ES |ss | TS 03 |6T |8T |2T |9T | ST | FT| et | St) Tt or 6) SI 2191 S/F) 8) 3) TON is required to appear and answer or demur to the Complaint, or the Plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the Complaint. This the 22nd day of March, A. D., 1927. J. A. Hartness, c.. 8. C., of lre- { dell County, N. ©. ' Lone & Glover, Attys., for Plaintiff. Mar. 22-29 Apr. 5-12-D | “"H uewayy “DIT SA “2 [ezeH ‘d0J01g Lt6l 3 i Saag a 2 mi C= a Q @ _ > = no +8 2 oO a z lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally AdOD 2 IDNIS HLNOW 3NO SHLNOW XIs uvszA 3NO 0 TBST dxe | uo i<y Fo 4 pdaqiaza oT 49 a {426 G | Bare js) t NORTH CAROLINA, ) JREDELL COUNTY. —_— In the Superior Court, Before the Clerk. Mrs. Hazel Pierce, Plaintiff, 3. H. H. Pierce, Defendant. Wotice Of Service Of Summons By Publication The Defendant. aboye named, H. H. Pierce, will -take notice hereby that an action entitled as above was commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County, N. C., on the 21st | day of March, A. D., 1927, for the purpose lof dissolving absolute, the bonds of Matri- mony now existing between the above named Plaintiff, Hazel Pierce, and the above named Defendant, H. H. Pierce, on the grounds of Fornication and adultery on the part, of the defendant, H. H. Pierce; That the Summons in said action. is returnable before the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, N. } C., on the 23rd day of April, A. D., . 192%, '} when and where the defendant, H. H. Pierce, is required to appear and answer or demur to the Complaint, or the Plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the Complaint. This the 22nd day of March, A. D., 1927. J. A. Hartness, Cc. &. C., of lre- | dell County, N. Cc. Long & Glover, Attys.; for Plaintiff. Mar, 22-29 Apr. §-12-D AVG’ NMSSM’ AUSAS asaHsi1End YOLaINdOY d ‘LNWAUG ‘W NWHDSd > ‘N ‘STUASSLVLS wa AVIVA AWTILASHULVILS GHD LOF Z |93 |S |FS |SS [ss | TS 02 |61 |8T [ZT |9T |ST | FT| eT | St) TL ot] 6| 81219) S|) 8] 3s) TON } } | | "H ueUuLO}] ‘d0I01g SA “DD [9ZBH “ddd G3aHSsINun4a ONISILYSAGV s}Ipeip ° z > vu U a a > a ° z lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally = = 2 ° os a 3 eS oo Le61 “SA *2D [9ZRH ‘d0J01g i Inthe Superior Court North Caroline May Term, 1927. Iredell County f Mrs Hazel Pierce JUD@EMENT. i j Vs ! H, H. Pierce | This cause coming on the be heard and being heard before his honor Judge Michael Schenck and the Jury; and the Jury having answered the following issues which were submitted to them by the Court as follows; First. Did the plaintiff and defendant marry and intermarry one with the other as alledged in the complaint? Answer. Yes. Second. ay oO = oe) & oy Fl Ss baad — Lé6I ‘SA ‘2D [9ZeH ‘s0I01g NOW, THEREFORE, It is ordered, adjudged and decreed , by the Court lst. That the bonds of matrimony existing between the said plaintiff be, and the same are, hereby Gissolved abso- lutely, and the said plaintiff, Mrs, Hazel Fierce, be and she is hereby granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with and from the said defendant, H. H. Pierce. 2nd. That the plaintiff, Mrs. Hazel Pierce, be and she is hereby relieved and released from any liability whatsoever asia wife to the defendant; and it is further ordered, adjudged Ce ee, a a ke Be hte at octane aceite Ledaiaeiiial ; aa and decre@d by the Court that the said defendant, H. HI. Pierce, be and he is hereby denied all right of courtesy or any other interest whatsoever in and to the property, estate and belongings of the said plaintiff. Sed- That the plaintiff, Mrs. Hazel Pierce, be and she is hereby, by the order and judgment and deuree of this pect granted full and unrestricted custody, control and care of all living children,issues of said marriage as above stated between the plaintiff, Mrs. Hazel Pierce, and MH. H. Pierce. 4th. That the plaintiff pay all the costs of this action to be taxed by the Glerk of the Sourt. Judge Presiding, ry oO oO = & § FE 3 8. 5a r< w~” Le61 ao a ° a =o : 5 mm L76] ‘SA “) [9ZBH ‘d0101g a enired VAR aR ee oom WOU NO RN HE rth te: LNA A ey tae Th tn Plt ft Aon ef be teh é "W PUyEW f1eqt0d “SA *y snqzeqry ‘1eq10dg Nerth carelina in the Superior Ceurt tredell Ceunty May rerm 1898 Albertus A. perter, plaintiff Vs Cemplaint. Martha M. Perter, defendant. The paaintiff complains and says; First--That he and the defendant were married en er abeut the 27th day ef October 1892; that at the# time ef the marriage beth were and still are residents ef the Ceunty ef Iredell. Secend--That en or abeut the llth day ef February 1894 the de fendant separated herself frem the plaintiff, her husband, and has lived separate and apart frem him frem the said llth day of pebruary 1894 to the present time against the wishes and desire of thts paamntiff; that in thus ab@ndoning him and living separate and@ apart frem him during this time he has been deprived of her company and marital rights. Third-- That plaintiff has dome all in his power to prevail upon the defendant te return te him and be a wife to him but that defendant has declined and still declines te return to him and live with him as man ang wife. Feurth-- That te him and defendant was bern a child new abeut four years eld Wherefere plaintiff prays; That the bends ef matrimeny existing between him and defend nt be disselved by a decree of this Court and plaintiff be freed frem any and all liability by reason of the marriage aforesaid and f@r such other releif as may be just an@ preper. L.C.Caidwell, Atty Albertus A .Perter being duly sworn says; That the @acts set ferth in the foregeing complaint args true te the best ef his beleif, that this complaint is net made eut ef levity er by collusion with the defendant and net fer the mere purpeses ef being freed and separated frem the defendant but in Sincerity and truth fer the catses set ferth in his complaint; that the facts set ferth in his said complaint as grounds fer diverce have existed te his knewledge fer mere than six months prior te the filing of this complaint. That plaintiff has been a res ident ef the State fer mere than two years next prior te the commencement of this action Swern to and subscribed before me the 2) day ef y etek -— So | cu | MAELO it ill it i i ti “SA alhege dt % "W PUGH ‘1eqt0g *y snqzeqly ‘iezod Porter, Albertus A. vs. Porter, Martha M. "W BUWeW ‘107I0d "y snqaeqty ‘107104 jJaund a AS ee pr | eee Maile act Defendant | | | hei ee ae ottigeL } ~ ots 77 re § i ccaaaet Bek aa Launtdered We [Lai Lz | | e Za Via Soe of. res 3 (TFS Aw | | fo Lee Fie. E onle aa = a 4) oe eee og Ae Lhe -g tmp Oe Seine: hes nn Ce “$ Ale 247 Boa 1024 vb Sn -4- te. Me bo tenth, frie bees. 2 ee Pe eee pS 9.2 6Uu, Voit, Chia Oh. Loe nr Jw obi prey Oger Bork mm] °V SNZeqTy ‘104204 *SA “W PUWEW ‘404209 ‘North Carolina, . In the Superior Court. Iredell County. May Term 1898. Martha M. Porter, Plaintiff, vs Albertus A. Porter, Defendant. The plaintiff complaining alleges : lst. That on the 27th day of October 1892 she was married to the defendant A. A. Porter in Iredell County; that at the time of the said marriage both plaintiff and defendant were residents of Iredell County and they had been such resi- dents from birth, and the plaintiff has continued to be a res- ident of the County of Iredell from date of the said marriage to the present time. 2nd. That on the 5th of February 1894 the defendant separated himself from the plaintiff and lived separate and apart from her for a short time, to-wit until about the 1lth of February 1894, and then afterwards about the 2nd of March 1894 he abandoned the plaintiff, his wife, and has lived sep- arate and apart from her from the said 2nd of March until the present time; that in thus abandoning her and living sep- arate and apart from her during all this period of time he has failed and neglected to do anything whatsoever for her support or for the support of the child Ethel, born in the marriage, now in her fifth year, and dependent upon the plaintiff alone for her sustenance, training and education. Sra. That the plaintiff has no property of her own and the defendant has left no property or means under the con- trol of the plaintiff whereby she could provide for her own support or for the support, maintenance and education of the infant aforesaid. That the plaintiff is informed and believes that the defendant since his abandonment of her as aforesaid has lived and is now living in the County of Rowan, North Car- Olina, and that he is earning wages from certain employment (2) /in which he is and has been engagéd abit Sg to § per month; that he is an able bodied man and of sufficient intelligence to make ample support for his said wife and (child. 4th. That the phaintiffr, as stated aforesaid, has not sufficient means to furnish support for herself and her said child, and has not sufficient means to defray the nec- leeeney and proper expenses of this litigation, and for the reasons aforesaid that during this period of abandonment of her husband she has been compelled to rely for the support of herself and child entirely upon the laber of her own hands and such assistance as she was able to obtain from near friends 5th. That at the May Term 1894 of Iredell Superior Court the defendant on account of his cruelty to the Plaintirr and his abandonment of herzgke was indicted in the Superior Court of Iredell County and convicted for the said offence, and the judgment therein was as follows : "State vs A. A. Porter. Abandonment . Defendant pleads guilty. Judgment suspended on payment of costs, The defendant is required to enter into a bond in the sum of $100.00 to appear at the next term of the court and show good behavior and show that he has supported his wife and child. Defendant Porter with J. B. Glover as surety confess judgment for $50.00 for Payment and gives bond with | same surety for $100.00 for good behavior and support of wife and child*, And since the said conviction he has never done anything to support plaintiff or her child. Wherefore the plaintirr demands judgment : lst. That the bonds of matrimony existing between herself and the defendant be dissolved by the decree of this Court. (3) 2nd. That the Court grant pendente lite such ali- “mony as the judge shall deem to be just in aid of the support of her child and to defray the necessary and proper expenses lof this suit, and that she recover the costs of this action Ito be taxed by the Clerk of this Court, and for such other / © and further relief as in law and equitymshe may be entitled ’ Long & Long, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Martha M. Porter after being sworn deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of affiants knowledge and belief; that this com- ‘pleint is not made out or levity or by collusion with the defendant and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from the defendant, but in sincerety and truth for the causes menticned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to her knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint and as stated in the complaint the plaintiff has been a resident of the State for two years next preceding the filing of this complaint. Vr Gn Wf, Vert Sworn to and subscribed before me this January 29th 1898. Mbt cha Co (&) -tis dowe eftf etnebreq taatg $109 edt JadT -baS froqqus ed? to bta al sast ed of meeb {fade enbst ond? es yetom | aseneqxs teqotq his yiseseoen eit ysrteb of bas bitdo ten to aottos atd? to efsoo ant 1tevooe: oe sae bas , tive atd? To aenso fove 10T ‘brs ,f 100 ‘ald? 0 dial) ont “yd “fexs? ed 02 | | OM yam ode ytiupe bas wal r es tetlor (1 yisaut oma SY, fs “s Ht egaol % ga tald 10% ayernrossA ( x 20geb mtowe gated 1efts 1pkrod .M adds * \ i 7 if | | YN \ \ es alqmoo yatogetot ed? at) it tea efost edt sarit! snes site tant :tetied bas eabslwor. atasttts to teed sit of ads dtiw noraalrTes wo ro ywerver voc THO ShaW Tor er TSE! bn beert yited to ssoqivg sem edt 10t ton bas tnabneten sot dftutt ons yteteonte al td etnahneted ent mort hess 1sq9a8 tan atost ent Sad? : tnt sLquoo edt at benolinem es2NBo ed? betatxe evad eo1ovtbh 10% ebavorg 28 tatsfiqmoo ed? al Attot to yalLit ent of tof1q edtnom xia. sadet te eahs {wok tod of ttitnatsata edt tatalqmoo edt at netase es bas Satalqmoos aid? yithessiq 2xem atsey ows tot efat® esi? to tnebleet 4 need esd .tatafLqmoo aldt to gatlit ent) eroted bedi:rsediea bas of wrowe 8GSi Ages yrsunst eld? om) “SA fl In the Superior Court. North Carolina, May Term 1898. Iredell County. Martha M. Porter, Plaintif?t, vs Albertus A. Porter, Defendant. To A. A. Porter, defendant in the above entitled .cause a Take notice that the plaintiff above named will make a motion for an we. for alimony pending the suit in the above entitled causa, ‘before His Honor McIver Judge at the next ensueing term of tie Superior Court of Iredell County on Saturday the 12th day of Pebruary 1898 in Statesville, or on such subsequent day as His Honor may be able to hear the saic motion, and for the causes set forth in the complaint now on filed in the Clerk's Office pf Iredell County. deny ili vs - - x ide A.A.Porter. Ye proms Ain diadtinn lle SR 4d ce Og ge Pn vx Bes Sag ee gee ee a , ~ < oe SaeeSb 336 ‘ fo t. )} Liebe: - / Ott _d pe foi Phewr ” 4 G i Ce, Pra EEL tr Cb La Vir Lhe tg baad Pra. tt Cf ing gt: Vhs Yr, r hee : Sf Lowe gore Ze Perens chil AY gn sacl ¢ ¢ Legs Zo Cae, 42, afte fon. of bode Le G, na AO 49 RQ A af” TLE, CaF 5 FMP wen, 2G ete~ Pr, R Mf fr vo. | A A Bee. i | | Hot. ra the 6% be oe el ifncc Fe hain fe fpr ae. pune Prokve ow-T% a2 bd eee gee Be ape Pla, © Peeve og IB Liglf, ar en 117h | Lea [or bor Pian dank eee acy ee, ees, eee Z i hot IN ee ace S Lbs, Lat1. Sox ie ey a SS ee Mh PO Bas, the Defrnda Kh rr 2K 42% He Kir- vA, Qa Jey Pent trea, ait agfeonr os AF. Pr2 aa, B Eka Soe, la Jeeta ton 2 Fg ge a ye fF Th ee ee 2 ad Ages es tts ee cine a ee hog he Sek Sen's Gece FON 2.. nfG Cee Pe sik tr ao trek wah Bz, ct lee tee MeL en Oiet: Oise Oped ote ee hi, et te Cn Fe i ¥ ae a oo ee eee Ae Hh on oot SAM ZL i} f | | een oft FS wt Ge fe goa | Agha, Le trict Grn. Like rhs Luir| Gl (fe Loot tle oh ond ta~w. ee a beth» of Merete, goss & 2fG~-< , RH, SAL ed “Sack. jedan A ek £i~ ge ant ae | hy ‘1eqog *SA "A PUTER "Vv enq.zeqty ‘104t0g MeL had ° 9 Siihor NOP A Ricde Ait ee. i eee Hg be ont 7h ftanteg, Ban Penta | ver aa oS a ree “tf e "SS Alay 4 et ose Chins AG Gro ~~~ Leas Lf oe, pe beth 1g Phan 0 a Cees Pee i ade ok. 46-2 <g eee ee no arf, Bh aed: Cocca ag Ctr caer Ok. - ie DAB | reeten Tim. pu innce inn, iZgam i ax. Df ro-t, agly Crnateea pid to ee 1+-Ze - pea an 2 te Ale foe hint agt~ Pet ox Dscenroy oe Be be Titan eee | eT \ } pot 4g cffeth ko~ & | tow fponrcteuty 4 he Gees | oemerenuengenenenpeserpnsssonenensnee \Avu 2. L_p——~ ad BE pean ee, S Lot | Ok TL. fra, In 15 2 @ a Coe e_ ao tee) eee Fe i ee a ie ie V2 Sein Airtel ee Bot 2 oan - plo=—-LZY ig ee 4 G-t€, pores aS She ele ee Ge ween, Zé. ae AS eee af for in pid ag lr pag e~s Li awa Che Bane. Phe Of GA p ro eiereJ Y ota (/ me | ‘. a € hiv are Zar. foe Pi ae is Cnr fp WM. Mew, BA Los, fae Te Bie Bee ee Ir ee a Oe oe ee. -~ P20 ~e ig ye Ca fy Lea a) Migteee—. ee oan Sev, ro, ore Saw pi ba °“f f-2-# av P Ota pos z : at h oy the ee acest a a ae a a ee ig CBr 7 tng aerh CL ge Oy oe Mike ion oc hon oS Ze el ee oe ee a+) AVe~ Se ee Pe ee) | Chet 4 hi Qewnw~meek, A 92-2 “tin, | ic ae Zo i ae C-~g7 An ?e_ | 22 [ss Qed by es, exe AC Le _ \1 Be ohh Lu. 4K Kee L. fer ty | > @ ane, IZ A ow) “L.. +¢-) a af frat ~ hokK cfr ae Peek oF. aoees a) Ps ge or | | La alan pal | } Phx eee Pe See ce fp oven us €-—, rf e TA_ wot fer Zh og. As. fee ieee a | LAA Cities, fo a MO taunt Sle } <a he les a fo baed f6-2-s Pere <2 aT tne <> aed a es Ir ee pC -~ GL aa See ay ss rectly nn feo Z Qeed-— 2a Dr, ay > ee ees fe | fer 5 WA-~-§--— Th A pe ten ee dal Le fecal pe ae ii ee mee Oe Ze en oe) — aS hte. Orr <2 Chet a ae hte. t ee -% fea ¢ wor. ~* = ee PL Of for Z | oe aa ae gp feay oe or Be i ee ae fort, BH zx Gck lao ck Peace Lie oe Ien~y Mee 2 De ac far ies XY 4 a ad i peewee, Pee mk oe a7 ae 4220 Ba a eae. ok The Ok dine... _ 2. cats oe SK ean 2 Pe ae es Ze | r— ig We feo owt | a as Xf go |Z. Ss. ing ie, oe Ze xz agp ‘Lawintcuw- 2 Aa epee a Bo 4 Ae fa BR Bb % re. b> Ee (ee s—~— Abie f < ox. i ee Coe cohegallinas ail og vie Ay . ; 7 a hes ip 7000 pi Ib, . fe aed Win Strue, ane Aegipetlack 2 pa tuk Me MphG G1ferird, fm. Me flair hy hirlee yp 0acn 206, Keaed agliieg VhFeKiid “Le SCORE «ae iccelnke rece, ppc ee BLY Y Bae SeeG 4G +3 OMALECr-21 Are eg «tet a ~ ) oer: . é oe os SS wa » Tsadgaed y ogokee ae DAISY QS OR 7, aos passed Qasr a Sg , : WA Desde s.hSs DEBS BV WLAN HH ! BPD SS Grea KAA ADK ars GRIan8 oh sh | Wass Locate - ; mam =. — ~_a ; ak Cw s@DdDd $os2dd 3S ~ . ‘. = a a PoP \ a> W. M. Howard after being sworn deposes and says that he is well acquainted with Mrs. M. M. Porter, and has | known her from infancy and since marriage, and that she is a lady of the highest character. He is also acquainted with her husband A. A. Porter, and resides in the neighborhood where Mrs. Porter resides, and knows the fact that A. Ae Porter has deserted his wife and child and: left her and her child without providing any support for them. That on the llth of April 1897 in conversation with A. A. Porter he heard him say that since he had been living in Salisbury, end since the abandonment of his wife, that he had been making as much as $45.00 per month for his wages, and that he had been re- ceiving that sum for a considerable length of time. That affaiant is informed that the said A. ‘. Porter when he abandoned his wife left a mule in Iredell County which is now in Iredell County as he is Yatoraied, and is worth $50.00 _e KU Lewwd Sworn to and subscribed before me one yf ele 1896. - Ze. StL be “SA “WH PUWEW ‘1eqd0g | Werte /W. Poder | ve Le &. Serr aftr Aicg bas | dpaces aud Ley/4 Hert tee 14 ia tes ol Cathair far Ghat 2 ytaw; | sae ge dy oe [cay Shak Be ttf oe ne G | J Raelecem, Cuese/ ie ead | Cf fait Ad cect ALRe grated eA Le a Ct te Cth ae | Cle nwe AG | tee Lite odeler Glu Fae, ft IFFT /2. Foca hurry Viti, Ati sec RRO tN gn Martha M.Porter vs A.A.Porter. H.M.Wagner after being duly sworn deposes and cays That he is well acquainted with A.A.Porter; and something over one year ago affiant hea@d the said A.A.Porter say that he was acting in the capacity of yard master of the Southern Railway and that he was receiving $35.00 per month for wages at that time; that the defendant is between 24 and 30 years of age; affaint further says that he lives in the neighbgorhood of the plaintiff and he knows that the defendant has abandoned the plaintifff and has not lived with her for 3 years; that at the time the defendant told the affiant about his wageshe staté further that he was saving and laying aside his money. Affiant is well acquainted with the plaintiff in this action and says that she is a lady of excellent character. Sworn and subscribed to before me this the 29th, day of Jan.1898, [Phew haseg _sMatarr Public. Martha M. Porter, vs A. A. Porter. M. M. Litaker after being sworn deposes and says that he knows the plaintif® Mrs. Porter very well and lives | near her. That she is a woman of excellent character. That about three years ago the defendant abandoned her and his child, which child is now with the said Mrs. Porter, the mother, and that he has not provided anything for the support of his said wife and child since his abandonment of them. Sworn to and subscribed before me this 8th day of Yebruary 1698. “SA "H PUTER ‘107204 Martha M. Porter, vs A. A. Porter. J. A. Lippard after being sworn deposes and says that he is well acquainted with the plaintiff Mrs. Porter; that she is a woman of good character and reputation, and has an infant dependent upon her for support, the child of her and the defendant. That some time in the Pall of 1897 affiant heard the defendant say that he was in the service of the Southern Railway Company and was then making about $40.00 per month. That he at first served as car coupler but was then serving as yard conductor. That he was laying up his money and expected to invest in real estate. That affiant lives in the neighborhood where Mrs. Porter lives and knows that the defendant has abandoned his wife and child for about three years without providing any support for either of them. A t Lhe Sworn to and subscribed before me this 8th day of February 1898. neler; Pathe "V enqzeqTy ‘zeqz20g “SA “H PUWEW ‘104209 Martha M. Porter, vs A. A. Porter. A. M. Litaker after being sworn deposes and says that he knows Mrs, Porter and her husband, and that he knows that the said husband has abandoned his wife and child without providing anything for their support. Affiant heard the defendant say in August 1897 that his wages amounted at that £4 Cet Leh. ‘ a Sworn to and subscribed before time to $45.00 per month. me this 8th day of February 1898. Vistar, (be aia iti a an RAD cna ms sres10F% .M sritisll. ev .aest109 .A WA evyse bns ee20qgeb a10we anied 29st sedertid M.A awont ed tant bas ,basdewd 1en bas 1et1049 .exM ewom! 94 tant tyontiw biido bas ettw ein benobnsds esd busdewn hiss edt san? ent Prsed tostItA .troqque alent 101 gointyns jntbivorg tei? #8 betnuoms seyaw eld tant veal taunuA ol yse tnabneteb .ifnom 19q 00.28% of emit ere in lee nin i eee sec tae Sale eae A A A EO ED e1cted bediirsedwue bas of miowe -8C8L yisuidet to ysb At& eld? om Sv bake Co ot Se Pov. hs rr ae wt Fan k. i > 3. Get Be fever 2a2z ! | ee a. Ue Be | | QL Or Inte Sf fe i ba. Ain: 9 ee od ae as Ge Mare incon gies) Mite See Gee Hk trac AaYfrr<en( Chak tev Lime 4g CLH | a2 ateti tr Lax t.4 a Ue Nee te Ste ee Low Lin~ fo | eK ond gen Ss ape ae} 7 i presen Ly rece > 3 Z gi on Pa soe ee See eR Be Ger Pak, Wh ait 7 oh te gee Pride, Pefa rae, hin Dig 4 Kran, “ss? i te. Loa Cox ew™ | i hal hata pb Cit % « % in” a) oe y Ss : North Carolina, In the Siperitor ¢ourtd_, +A yw f Iredell County. May Term 1898. a 7 o Martha M. Porter, Plaintiff, i” vs ‘ Albertus A. Porter, Defendant. { To A. A. Porter, defendant in the above entitled cause : Take notice that the plaintiff above named will make a motion for an order for alimony pending the suit in the above entitled cause before His Honor McIver Judge at the next ensueing term of the Superior Court of Iredell County on Saturday the 12th day of February 1898 in Statesville, or on such subsequent day as His Honor may be able to hear the said motion, and for the causes set forth in the complaint now on filed in the Clerk's Office of Iredell County. Kk Ye = . t d & Aghey ~ $ a | eds al | vant ows? As1ol up ae a} Bel mieT ysM I -vsawod Leber! . oh t oe ¥ Ttbtatslt ~res10T .M sdtteM | Fs Se } ee av } } stasbasted ~19t0F A eutred tA) - peuso beltttne evods edt at tnabneteb ,1t9t10% .A eA of | {{tw beman svods Ititatselq ods tad? eotton sist nt tive ent gatbneg yaomtis 10% aeb1o 18 10% nottom s stam | eit? ta eybut r9evioM 1onoH atH e1otsd 98us° heltttne evods ari mo ytnwod ({sbe1l to t10D tolteqgue eds to ores yitewene sxen no 10 ,efLitveesaté at sesl yisimidet to ysb AgSi odd ystrussae® pise edt tsed of sids ed yam 1omoH ail as yab sneupsadua fosse | no wen tntslquoo edd at dftot Joe Beatso efit 10% bis ,nolszom .vtauod LLeberl to soitto atstrelD edt at ball? | \ ~ \ : " \ Co’ Vy WAS : >. a ~~ “~ “¥ snqzeqty ‘104104 “SA “W PUQtEH ‘1ezI10g lll Mae iad ~ a hase Mtge —— i der eae each eats Set | + erenninenoneon Mary M. Foor td A. VOM ; ee [hui ly Marrs bf be deforctuwe ic ; (EEL 0d 20leg4d - cys 14 flainlitf teen a2 teed Leak ag he JKale: hava | boroliun fr bio You jar G ite felt Cia Vock a ) Sy dhe Uefuniau Cosrnl, | heaee Ereessly Ab nian, Cire COR. Vico Caree Coming nha hear? at ler bsie, (Aiton? and affiteucGe fered ly took of dig fockin , aS bate flactiiy Leig £2 hy fees fre~ the Affeceuts act @2tera, ,' Shak Ue flasirly tud defertaul mene Onasnd L7% Atlelin, 092. Gish hie rece rf, die Wosniaze ee One Ched haw cu her fre Gear, thal, Mainly rhaut 4 bert Iy¢ and fad tise. | er. tethiaicd fr Au AthenKdkteccecec? Bec. Y che Ve eo 2uwCttte C2tfLe OES, § AecteOL ie Ly hire 21s | Seige: oo id i : es oo wid Yisero2nd Ku geen f. vee weitetiblon: 4 OF Lent tC, ee et Wat white Ag CL2 Bee ZK fee~ cfex weet | YlatA wn Few ite airy “p hag ALLEY A oe Lette ge ARl20977722-See€ Leclo ZhCeoze Faw pected Le — Me fit 2ecare€ 0 Siw Lae Capes et, oo Beote( teflter- es fe Libeta. le ae i Aegerrcter2+t csr tccseniay (PEVA?AX cach Me CBLLLELL AL fis ZZz“~<2t) Zi 222% Goof BrclbeZ, feta age Fee ae Li. “at 11% A Poa A4tZ22 2tlle 5 Lz Ab Lee 4 cw Bee A1amricise fOartf, t< td Cte tec Ziel” Mifare! ¢ Lt. 702 Jeg. aa Bee ace fica le Lee M222 F ALE $4 (etl F Met ‘ real Zerace-fett per Loews a | i i i ze A Se LuLtrtlh , ZZEb ls ee (22a07 eects. lew‘. ‘bs tase, Ltez Cec 7 & eee, a7 ft Me FERS < <t- eg MEL GFL, tel” Mtn, 02 Vegeret AK Loferréecrtt, , clase tiih, dtl 127 ZtezeD £2 Ly2e "A VD Lir CPSP TERS Le a A. ta ee. CLEZZLE V-_ Slat le Dpett Ce Fie. Cou Ciptsead Gee Z-E ey, le <eazgcCe peek L4LEE sete leeey O Lad nadheclcm . ae diated séitltn.. ttle 4h oe ee Zutvr Oz zZ cee, € weft, Lz | Fad flaunt Clenee necetlles T tae {CEI ?P a fh ; k peepee — we Me fe Zittecz-k LI Agtcg. Li — frecu ae ee Wace ZZ Ase Z5--4 Z4 Ze <— cx = D saeamenaeceaes: 2 pe fi Lurie tiper tctecceww bizgeds. Wo rec 14 0-7 fe —— Lint J2nte Pofcasdii** Gc22te Le — Tea Zee ttaetleputcEecge tz ee tee (Ae I sme CL — J 2atd Atetet tte. Lee li om pte e2tle + geal aw’ A bietenn Gt ton se e aoe, re, Use Lbvvtl ua Ca 5 | L s2b1e te bow Ze Z2eT Gtenuee iw Iott her heh. Apne ae Lee Lecce es Lis tee WAteV ¥ Ce (idc“e og ne . \o Arffizl ZaitrtK fae Rar Fay | fPrrretet Cy ance sexier reg < seek th | oe wt B2H teeta 214 AEE eG lox Da] dene) $2 clexce 1149 Lecce there eat 420€ Ficcta Lut he ee: ps Lt1eeu pees Atte. ee C witsen uf hhuc IP POAS af tur eed ak. & "SA °9 efuueg ‘siemog °O semoy ‘s1emog AERA ———., | | | | | | | || & i Ae Gy é; ‘ poe | Zee YEH Z etic Late 4 tt z<erey f Leese Ce. | oF Pe 7 \ oe A t2uthlhe CP2 e27reze <j? tz Zuk.. b ie ke lee gx LA Ae ite as dclra2 ee wpe Ce ae. Aire c| Ee Oe BE eee’ 722 ce tule . gee eee Ac : teed Site Ky Lae Le. 2eéclC << oe ‘ 7 —— 4 i; ‘s S a is ft c Kettle yl Wan11W0e sJonw“ew Lewd 2 ecweew | / FF | or | Yaa aA Parrce LeferzceresA tlecé1t~Co 2 ECs) f 4 \A cael, 4, tte phir. A svt fee vant Ee <<—€ a fi. LZ f WA Z < fy as -~ a fw T+€ J CLA LAL: 4 Zi2ze b,_hnm- da LL Ze 7€ a f, G7 fy 4 Z i, eee, thLU Le Jtt<e_ J Att LIC CREED 4 —_—— — “gm ‘ 7 wa if, pw JEAN ité tf he LA2LL2 Z z LOC? C1= ‘i Zez27- Ft / ” le Z fet i“ vig |ZZ Ate tittthe Lt 4g2221 tet 4c — , J rl a2-41 ee Meter XG Sg , <-- al gg | lee fede - nny \faraeecee Conte crs £4¢2téek. a fae 14% appre oe SS | - | 421c/é Doce tule i Gan. 2 Ze Lite lle Pe | A yr | Yt CZ ose ‘ : Vid ~ Gare Lk: Lefer tteeeyl tlecta1-e2 CEs, q 4 \A <A 2ete 4, | th. plas. tT tats tinea net <<—€ | 4 . 7 \ ins lh - | as lecnme!d Mg te eee et hud Ze <2. tte ‘ os ee neritigg FNA1t)H Le Leo Ape. Adultery tothe A144 SAILS Z, LL" thee &B. | nT WZ22zx0 Lees. VALLZLZEL a ae 2 te27-4t<-7t _—__ BD feterity tee Gate tebe ~ tere’ LA +4 | Lhe fue. “eet @Z lo tes és oe So pee A’: | Cased slearetar ek pelt. 7 FEF Poe 2 A eee Le Zetec YY Lee ected bee Lezcd Ze el iS 8 % 2 < a - 5 a OQ ° *O etuueg ‘siemog | A1r21ck Leet. ae Let Sv aae Mani ae ae et | ee J, oe |2edleted ete s ea bee. Laaed eased in ACC € IG , frrane2zttseecee I p22 eZ fase ata |\ZaeeL Ce Mout ite et72ez is Canoe te. LEAL GEE Gee) felon bZ, Aine ZY a2zae (fz 21st Lk L Ls plu a2. e of Aatfer? Ate WZ; < L220 +A Ld 22a ee FEZacEéwt~ le the Lecce“ aS amt Batic C~ kx Ga thin“ (ees 22-0, fog (pes laa eT KE C2€ Ar cee { aZ Lit& Aie Cm eZ ‘ hex ge y y hay, Sant: ak te boa J L2fel 7 BA@“oe«* I] 4 peel < . nek. ee { 4 vs or PZ | pth ine, CT. Soe 7 Jt aA a DL Ca 4 D Lx 222-4 Afm— 7 eg ; — hi A> e(Aez2z Lt LeEwte Gh, | Cec’ 2207 i JZ jude | AA Md: 6 Lea! ne ae gece C Lee 222 ee ff x y -t£_Z 2 t.. AAC Cee lets Ca ? s A : A Coe CEA 5 ge ‘ ty ae — oom (Le 272 ¥ 1: them hp. Zh Pte it. tt7e7e Gy oJ 4 y NACA} ’ Ee tact C24 aa as le22zeC 7 r7 + °9 seuouy, *SIemMog "SA _*9 efuuey ‘sizemog WAL (thee is YLCE—EL 7: ae flav Liha ateets fever Ze arth, ll V+ es ce teeaetect..2ot Q/ES GF ae ae 4A24vtl242e2 er. LL ten in. Be ZL SP Zt-2e & Gun. to LL uae OASCia2 fect Ce ie” A pe F ULE j ie 2 thin &- Shine 7 A22e oie GE ute ~. ZL ee i finale het fee ate Maw terete 4rrg hee t ce L471 2 Lge be ced SL kfc eer Meena te PL & BP Meeelie fh, & Zaz Aew~ Sard Lessafh lene tcf deat 1214 0Ck- act - fete O A- as Lative FAL €a— tia Lia C +e eh Leas sa Mi st, ee (eee Co Atncer-G ic Lee por Cae 4 ree Aetna. ee Jet Meer seated oi Ss. Cit: Am feel y ebfo Bie ar taw Leagecer Cevrcfiliceert ef YZ 4 we J 0222) YW Aten lectin. eee ok zt CO filet) Pbreceteggye, Dek Pe ex 222 epee. ! Ce flei “ ta—fLeler pep Hed J a | 2222 fas ee a St Gi2~ Frigg A, MSs £rA -—— fet et dl A ae OF Aug Aas pds. Le — SEC Llée<] AB Cong (GLE, | | O | Z “is i . ¢ AY Yi vA ZL aelenr 42 A a s ert c : | A Zo ¢ LEE vo tel; j Vf Cr2zt ( a1Z43 . LOT ties — 3 Lt tilde C14 Tony a A224 Ly leh Lg ee bi fi ( | 2 c Js cag CI r2ne7 Law Aflieedéecert Liew oe — | 0 Certs t2ctte2 eek 4 CLl2461~< C1. 2 peel ok. iI} ° | ~ e 7 D2 At cE pevael AZ (erie Lted Bee Mh P72 Lam La Ze ae a a il | | | | ue en Foce~<7 | hed. dcecantigs, Seat ET a a | awe Jk Ap ferrcce fore le tee, Mak K war ake fa B froma | We Le flewetack, ld 17 2ce-K-|| L : * | of La Gra PerF£ OSS i] “SA ing Simca ae rer °O eftuuey ‘siemog . a. °O etuuey ‘siemog WE or a, ee Powers, Fannie C. Vs. Daceaenm [Oe . | z4 + 4 a J a 3 Legge = eo; aQ oa Srcete ofl Pht fj _ 3 e et a e z i sf} 4 Nenana? Powers, Fannie C. vs. Dauare Thameac (* £25 OLEH LEAL T IGINE ITE “~ \ a . GREETING : WE, reposing special trust and confidence in your integrity, do authorize and empower you to cause AX Wh G. We Cee? cee to appear before you at such time and place as you may appoint, and LLL... CL fp oath to examine touching all such matters and things as Moron SHOU kenow of, and concerning «a certain matter of controversy in our Superior Court of the County of... Bukit pending, wherein Alani j / tite ASS Plaintiff..... and Ar2c1 Cc A oieey 4 Defendant... And the deposition in writing, by you so taken, the same to transmit, sealed with your seal, to our Superior Court, to be held for said County, ae . Hh : — on the. AK KR ¥ dhe ic MWe Aflinter Sige: Ae ‘ , Clerk of said Court, at office 8x7, Clerk Superior Court. €&, thy, County. “SA J Seavey, st OMNUd *) etuueg ‘s1eMod a °) eTuueg ‘sizemog Ze eee af hice Aes ee ee Gla .tiZ | ae eee re | heeeen Go ctsDapatoniia fsetfiue sania x ho tor 44.6. Mrraceect 21d ag ot (etm \Lochine fer Le (laity ~ — ee. eke re eats CO ft cesalC te 2G ei ; fee a agA, Mh. Lo Le preclemey Lagan ota { ) i | 2ctr17 a Fe ues, sugeits Zz 2b Iu wi} : tL ge pL tL atl. Fe eevattliin 4 ypate aoe eth Mhcr Hayetey, i 7 z ; : Z B °SA °O etTuueg ‘sizemog es ie tues, eee Be. cee. Se Le catinyn about I. otal fom Ln rao jeer ote OB eag gt , "palit ” tte | 7 bs eae ete SS Ee aa Mn ed~ 2 iSeut Pig a dy leer Lalaice| Dovwt ty. wid Fo 20. Conn GM oy Led 4 tin tha Whe by Werth Gunobicns a (KE hay tg D2 cc Le Sad ($79 | rere 2Y 15 as, ol ea fé&4 a etm 21% Cee cael ks Ne Alteger th» le ree te Mae ae AA Of Marc foe~ 41 vle2rcrk leg FB Voiced fo fae Whe rervie guid < oe ALC Cwneler o DB La LBL. “0S A / Y ad in pry Maw Xr 2e}’ L001 i a Le _Vearer) & Ajijic “at 42272 at LA — elect Cre Bernt! A chance aah aa ty | FEY) ; a Jorn 7s 7V ~_ Za lo— Cress Yue sae Bs re Ri hohs cats ued Cc pre Qeete tn aad JA Lt An aster Jor eee har AA Mowe | be ey, (Lepice 2c D ttfew QL- td Mas: Cote Zccet4| aa eee Custis Grew C04 Ketere€s CkE. HK ST ee : ci eam 4 4 fQ4e Pee Bf wes Zenre AR jew Gece fterk Caew4>f Lp Aae£“ ete ke Avec c Lee ern tecc€ ie JtetHe. cee ef c22t WORE <3 4 Liew Lgl A221 ty cee C01 CL CHOC OLS. € Aurd€ prcesan, aArseceere! ZCe222e vr J fiw 7 < Eo a ff tee ee Sos = aa K<e2 tk (aertl t1. @ebete 6 2tI Aster. of, ; C1ed Qo pLee tg tltn E AP LS. ag Office f ! The Landmark Printing Establishment, N. E. Corner Broad and Centre Sts., Statesville, IY G , Tha na te entify Buwv ta. Aten acim of a cia OP eemiriots Beran T feervsnes Cto: Prr ic War pwuittit._t Pa am Lit stethich ie ss FHL ies. Kerc0o fer s-y os ¢ @ % aQ . "3 @ ss | js @ oO ° } 1 | Gd, ccd fir CA tee Powers, Fannie C, vs.