Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDivorce Records 1855-1913 King-McNeelyes 5 gs > 3 gp 5 Ee. ” < ¥ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. County---GREETING : ou are hereby Cdiitaanoe to’, yolhianon a PAL wa OL val ah AA Z. ; fd the defendant...above named, if shes Ge found within your County, to be V; appear before the fadge of *) oD Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of si RA, qt Lt the Court House in Smad de Akon the! // _...Mondayafter the i Monday, of! PA e A the'same ‘being the ' pe Oawy of Una Se the complaint, a copy of which willi be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Syperior Court’ for'said Comtity; within the first three days; of saidr/Lerm, aud ‘let said) Defendants... take ‘noticd if A bec tina: fail to answer to the said gomplaint Within that,time, the: plaintiff.....;..will apply to the Cougt for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due retfirn. ia A Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this.... Be wig of, Yj ol L isp l ‘Clerk of Sopbion Court...’ oS, LAL 4 9g 2]quEsnzey Axxo 09 ree yp ; 2 i A \ 5 \ § er ! is } \ SN ‘ Z ‘31730 404 SNOWWAS ‘SA SlouBLy “Bury 0 Aes re, “AMWIONY SHYHAw I “— anime rwene: amass SI} 2M DIOJoq pequosqns pue 0} NIOMS *suOTNDexXa wi0I3 ydurexa Ajzado3d pue sarjz]Iqet] ‘syqep sty aAoge pue J2A0 SI¥[JOp pespuny OM} Jo uns 34} YOM st ay Shes MIOMS BuIEq™ “yo Leper] ‘Speas pu spavy Ino ssonzt Byarelg 24} Jo 12A0001 Ava yuBpuazag a4} SB }S00 yons |e HHApE[_ 24) jt “eaamoy *pyoa aq 0} ‘sxe]]0q ISNIVOV ‘Ayunod ‘ynog sopedng 24) Uy] \ ‘¥NITIONVYD HLYON JO SLYLS et Ati - North Carolina ) In the Superior Court Iredell County, ) Term, 1912, Francis King vs. Nelson Kine, The plaintiff complaining of the ‘defendant, alledges: First: That the plaintiff and defendant were married to each al other in Alexander county, N.C. on or about the S/* aay -of Ye 489 ’ and lived together as husband and wife until on or about the day of /70- Second: That on or about the day of /FO 4 the defendant abandoned the plaintiff and comitted fornication and aduitery with one Lillie Redman, as plaintiff is informed and believes; that said defendant took said Lillie Redman and left the state, as she is informed and believes,and is still Ie 5 gs 3) — bs) S QO B <= - living with her; that the defendant has not lived with the plaintiff ; Ai hence? since said date. oat Third: That the plaitiff has been a resident of Iredell county and state of North Carolina for more then two years next preceeding the filing of this complaint, and the cause alledred as srounds for divorece have existed to her knowledge for six moths and more prior to the filing of this complaint. RELIEF, Wherefore, the plaintiff prays for a decree dissolvinre the bonds of matrimony deretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant, for the cost of the action, and for such other and dubther relief as she may be entitled to in premises, Attorneys for plaintiff. ge s gS ge 7 e 3 SR Q SB BR’ < ¥ Cl6I er * Franois King, being duly sworn, says, that the facts set forth in the complaint are true to the best of affiant's knowledge and belief, and that the said complaint is not mado out of levity er by collusion between husband and wife, and not for the mere purpose of baing freed and seperated from oach other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the conplaint, that the facts set forth in the complaint, as srounds for eaerper: have existed to her knowledge more than six months prior to the 6: filing of the complaint; and the complaintant has been a rosident of the kkstate for two years next preceeding the ‘bore of the complaint. TAinvnwin CO Prat Sworn to and subscribed before me this 3 aay of April, 1912. Y yo a /Ultor/ Sire 7 age fet Peled cpt 24, ed | Md My Cd be ood i hate King, Francis vs. King, Nelson 1912 King, Francis vs. King, Nelson 1912 : el { ' i King, Francis vs. King, Nelson 1912 Bill of Coste—Civil.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. or other original process, including all . . + $ T.0off--*- Subpoena, cach name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian ....... Judgment Against ‘SA Slouely ‘Bury Filing Papers. . Postage, actual... . Transcript of Judgment ia Sheriff’s Return Appeal toSupreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00}}__ Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . Cor Constable . Magistrate. ..... Plaintiff's Witnesses. . . Defendant's Witnesses. “ ee CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--GIVIL, (As Fixed by the Code.) King, Francis vs. King, Nelson 1912 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF .—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. County.~- $n the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, a 5 mo. SAE Fe the defendant... above named, if _ Me. be found within oo to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of... LLLCC - at the Court House in : < fs UML FLSLA, { .on the 4 om —) Monday Bpér £5; Monday of MbE ok — 4 oe ae 7 the same being the W day of AA. 19//, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if eke they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return, 4 Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this d / day of Clerk of Superior Court eupy ‘ueWyry “] ‘A Geuppry “SA S16] ~ PeAfeoay “"O} a[qeuaInyey 131798 WOd SNOWWAS “YO JINOD Ioedng 3q3 Jo “AdUIO}Y Sparel “4g Aepo oom S TT BME VIOJG pequosqns pue 0} UIOMG ‘suorjynoexe wio1y ydutexa Ajzedoid pure sartyiqet] ‘siqop sty aAoge pue I9A0 SI¥[JOp pezJpuny OM} JO uINs 94} qWOM st aq Shes UIOMS BuIEq™ (‘1eag) ~ (‘1e9g) (‘Teag): oor VEY yo hep “Siq} ‘s[eas pue spueYy INO ssouy A *‘aoljoe SIq} ur” “Yyurelg 243 Jo raa0001 Ave jUBpUajeqd 243 Se }s00 yons |[e"* juepusjeg oy} Aed [yeys” Hare g oy} jt ‘saAoMoy ‘proA 9q 03 ‘s1B][Oq™ 7 juepusyeq 24} ““OJUN PUNO SeAlasino aBpo;MouyoR 9A LSNIVOV (ee | ‘WNITON¥D HLYON 4O SL¥LS ‘yunod JouedNg 34} Uy eupy ‘UeUyITy ‘SA “] “A UeUITy Sl6l | North Carolina, In the Superior Court. Iredell County. January Term 1911. He. L. Kirkman, Plaintiff. vs. Edna Redman Kirkman, Defendant.. SRSA SRE REESE The plaintiff complaining ef the defendant alleges : First: That the plaintiff and the defendant were married on or about the 28th of February, 1903, in said Coun- ty and State and since that time have been, and now are husband and wife. Second: That on or about the /§“day of *<7—-@~ 1909, the defendant disregarding the solemnity of the mar- riage vow, wilfully and without cause deserted and abandoned the plaintiff and has since then and still continues so to wilfully and without cause desert and abandon the said plain- tiff and to live separate and apart from him, without suff- icient cause or reason. Third: That after the defendant wilfully and with- out cause deserted the plaintiff, as above stated, the defendant left the City of Statesville in company with one Joe Moore and thereafter lived in adultry with the said Joe Moore or another person unknown to the plaintiff. Fourth: That since the defendant has abandoned the plaintiff she has given birth to a child begotten by one Joe Moore or others unknown to the plaintiff. Fifth: That the plaintiff has not received the def- endant in conjugal embraces since she abandoned hin. Sixth: That the plaintiff has been a bona fide res- 4dent of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceeding the institution of this acticn. i Na Rn a , ea eon ae v Seventh: That the facts herein contained and set forth as a complaint, have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for were than six months next preceding the institution of this action; wherefore the plaintiff de- mands judgment against the defendant that he be granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with Porn 2. fp Attorney for the Plaintiff. the defendant. E. L. Kirkman, being duly sworn deposes and Bays that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief and that | g the said complaint is not made out of levity or by coll- wsion between himself and the defendant and not for the purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but, in sincerity and truth for the cause named in the compla- int; that the facts set forth in this complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to his knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint and that the plaintiff has been a resident of this State for two years next proceeding the filing of the a ED Mi PY Sl aintiff. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 19th day of November, 1910. Clerk of Superior Court. vupy ueunyry ‘SA “T° UeWyITy Sl6l AA fe fe: x os 8 Pr tr tr a: -— . fi - e e Sl6l North Carolina I! Superior Court Iredell County | E.L.Kirkman, plaintiff I AFFIDAVIT TO OBTAIN SERVICE BY Edna Kirkman,defendant | PUBLICATION v 7 E.L.Kirkmen, being ent = Trev 20 ee were eee CSCI TA TOW pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County,the sheriff of said County has returned the summons issued to him in said astion endorsed," Hana Kirk- man not to be found in Iredell County"; that the defendant therein ean not after due diligenee be found within the state ;that the said defendant is a proper and neeessary party to gaia aetion; that this is an aetion on the part of plaintiff for an absolute divoree from defendant and that plaintiff is informed and believes that he has a good eause of aetion; WHEREFORE said pleintiff prays that an order be made by the Court that serviee of summons pe made on the said defendant by publieation in some newspaper publighed..in,izedel2.cosme7~ Ladies i kik pe ene in we an a Susseribed ahd sworn to a before me the 14th day of February,1914- o CLK“? GAX North Carolina | Superior Court. Iredell County | B.L.Kirkman I vs J ODER OF PUBLICATION. I Edna Kirkman It appearing from the affidavit of E.L.Kirkman, that Edna Kirkman the defendant therein,is not to be found in Ibedell County,end eannot after due diligenee be found in the State ,and it further appearing that this is an action wherein the plaintirr E.L.Kirkman seeks an absolute divorée from @efendant Edna Kirkman: It is therefore ordered that noti@e of this aetion be’ published onee a week for four weeks in the Sentinal,a newspaper published in Iredell County,setting forth the title of the aetion, the purpose of the same, together with a brief recital of the subjeet matter of the same, ahd recuiring the defendant to aprear at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County,to be held on the llth Monday after the list Monday in Mareh at the Court house in said county,and answer Ai or denur to the eomplaint of the plaintiff,or the relirf therein demanded will be granted. This the 14th day Feb.1914. eupy “UeUyITYy ‘SA J“ UeWyITY Sl6l Ra _a NOTICE OF SUMMON ‘py’ North Carolina, | tp Superior Court. - see lkioan | Notice of Bobiication | — t Summons. “H MONDAY AFTER 1ST MON: e being the 18th day of May, ii, ther al mca = Ae ee the ‘com 4int in seid action, ofthe Pa er y oe <a for the relief d in “eS w laint. ~ Feb. 1 j . ste oie Be cinaae” |te: = oe A. Hartness, | ~ 2-19-4t Clerk Superior cAR RFNT. | . _——- North Carolinas | Iredell County | J.H.Morrison,Editer of The Sentinal,a newspaper publ in Iredell County,and State aforesaid,being duly sworn, says; annexed advertisement of notiee,in the aetion entitled E.L.Ki vs Edna Kirkman,was duly published in the aforesaid newspaper @ week for four weeks,beginning with the issue dated February 19% FI, Wramnew “Eaitor o: sentinel. Sworn to and subseribed before me tnis £34 °a a, My eommission expires Mareh 7th,1915. eupy “UeWyTYy ‘q ueWyry ‘SAY Sl6l incited: sient sential i: ee _a NOTICE OF SUMMON * to | Wee, Y PY ‘North Carolina, | ty Superior Court. reet sete Coun ( ‘liv. EB uct : Notice.of Publication pak ot his Edna ‘Kiva. \ be Summons. Edna Kineman, © the defendant: above | 7; will take notice that an action : niTH MONDAY AUTER 18T. MON: DA AY I IN MARCH 1914, same being the 18th day of May, 1914, at the court house of said coun’ y in Statesville, N. C. and answer OF) 2 - | demur to the compl a Hy - — action, |, of the plaintiff wi 1 Sr ly to i court in said com- for the relief demand 7 19, ie -| plaint. Long & Scott, H. B.G Attorneys for paint” J. A. Hartness, 2-19-4t Clerk saperior Court. ar| +— ‘BAR RENT. North Carolina | Iredell County | J.H.Morrison,Editor of The Sentinal,a newspaper publ in Iredell County,and State aforesaid,being duly sworn, says; Th annexed advertisement of notiee,in the action entitled oe 0 vs Edna Kirkman,was duly published in the aforesaid newspaper @ week f = i or four weeks,beginning with the issue dated February 19% eae Rtmmer ~~KEditor of sentinal. Sworn to and subseribed before me this £4 da My eommission expires Mareh 7th,1915. ‘q ‘ueWyITy =a eupy “UePUDITY “SA Sl6l et ent Nam a NOTICE OF SUMMON * to | oe ea ‘ypy North Caroline, | In Superior Court. reet arenel County jive E. is Kirkman | Notice- ge Sma a Th his Edna Kirkman. Pies agcmsue. 5} Edna Kirkman, the defendant above E take notice that an action | ; menced a ‘ther take noti ‘she ving appear at the next term of e Si sent ior court © of Iredell county to be n a n the wall HTH MONDAY AFTER 1ST MON- | DAY IN MARCH ; 1914, same being the 18th day of May, 1914, at the court house of said county in Statesville, 1 N. C., and answer. or — |demur to the moa in said action, | P of the Plaintift will anded | to the a eth for the relief d emanded in said com-| -| plaint. 19, 1914. Long & Ry ta P. Grier, Attorneys for Plaintiff. ta’ J. A. Hartness, - 2-19-4t Clerk sapeniar Court. w! ar| -— 1 par RENT. North Carolina | Iredell County | | J.H.Morrison,Editor of The Sentinal,a newspaper publ in Iredell County,and State aforesaid,being duly sworn, says;Th annexed advertisement of notiee,in the action entitled te n vs Edna Kirkman,was duly published in the aforesaid newspaper @ week for i k four weeks,beginning with the issue dated February 19% Ad, ptmer “Editor of Sentinal. Sworn to and subseribed before My eommission expires Mereh 7th,19 eupy ‘ueWyTYy “| ‘uewyry ‘SAY Ccl6l eupy ‘uUeWyTy cl6l ‘q URWIyITY “a "SA os es en en at NOTICE OF SUMMOl * to | ta: ‘py | . t ina, : reet North Caney, In Superior Court. -}iy- E. L:, Kirkman | Notice.of oa | Th | ° e. 8. his Edna Kirkman. | Summons. 28-. | Bdna Kirkman, the defendant above | named, will take notice that an action entitled as above has been commence in the Superior court of Iredell county on the of the yn. | for the J ’ calvery on ; ving appear at the nex sent ior court of Iredell county n ow ee the will jyrH MONDAY AFTER 1ST mon-| Dr. DAY IN MARCH : t 1914, same being the 18th day of May, | 1914, at the court house of said county | (irk Statesville, N. C., and answer, or |G — |demur to the eer in said action, | Pe \f the plaintiff will apply to the court x 7 for the relief demanded in said com- Feb. 19, 1914. W Long & Scott, H. P. Grier, w! | Attorneys for Plaintiff. J. A. Hartness, | 2-19-4t Clerk Superior Court. plaint. ar| +— BAR RENT. North Carolina. | Iredell County | | J.H.Morrison,Editor of The Sentinal,a newspaper publ in Iredell County,and State aforesaid,being duly sworn, says; Tha pany advertisement of notiee,in the action entitled E.1 i vs Edna Kirkman,was duly publishec in the aforessid nina ° week for f i our weeks,beginning with the issue dated February 19% 44d, Mtiorr.e7 “Editor of Sentinal. — Sworn to and subseribed before My eommission expires Mareh 7th,1915 4 enanae ce —_ a _a NOTICE OF SUMMON * to fap WY North Caroli reet “Tredel ae In Superior Court. -jiv- E. ie eaeyone | Notice.of even en | h | his | Edna Kirkman. | Summons. | \E Edna Kirkman, the defendant above | | named, will take notice that an action fe ei as above has been commenced 26. in the Superior court of to See } n. | for, the. purpose, ont the f the |p "| paneie of intl ‘vin y 13 4 . Cale Sener aa endanton mc oO tie. pare of of Kirkman, and said defend fr ib. sed, ther take notice that she is Tal ving appear at the next term of the. pa to ah, sent ior court of Iredell county to be eld Gre n day on the Hic Dr | “| HTH MONDAY. AFTER 18ST MON-| DAY IN MARCH _ {Oi "1914, same being the 18th day of May, v \1914, at the court house of said county | {irk Statesville, N. C., and answer OF | ‘5 — |demur to the com Jaint in said action, \or the plaintiff will ap ly to the court | | for. the relief demand in said com- | plaint. Feb. 19, 1914. Long & Scott, H. P. Grier, Attorneys, _ Plaintiff. . Hartness, | 2-19-4t Clerk pieder Court. or — (BAR RENT. North Carolina | Iredell County | By J.H.Morrison,Editor of The Sentinal,a newspaper publ in Iredell County,and State aforesaid,being duly sworn ascii annexed advertisement of notiee,in the action sitial a nil vs Edna Xirkman,was duly publishec in the aforesaid newspaper @ week or 0 o ddd ee de al Me MWtornres Eaitor of sentinal. worn to and subseribed before My eommission expires Mareh 7th,1915 , ° ~* “qj UewW yy 7 eupy “UPUYITS ‘SA clél North Carolina | Iredell County | J-H.Morrison, Editor of The Sentinal,a newspaper published in Iredell County,and State aforesaid,being duly sworn,says;That the annexed advertisement of notiee,in the action entitled E.L.Kirkman vs Edna Kirkman,was duly published in the aforesaid newspaper onee a week for four weeks,beginning with the issue dated February 19th,1914. v ‘ tor of Sentinal. Sworn to and subserived bet me this ‘ hel ie, sald J Vive f—_ Ay 4 Th eu AIA My eommission expires Mareh 7th,1915. eupY “Ue y ‘SA “J “gq URUTY Sl6l Kirkman, E. L. vs. Kirkman, Edna 1915 North Carolina Supertor Court Iredell County. To May Term 1914 E.L. Kirkman { -Vea~ { Complaint . Edna Kirkman { tT}, The plaintiff above named complaining of the defen‘ant for cauee of action alleges and says: First. That on or about the 9th day of Feby 1903., in Iredell County , State of North Carolina , plaintiff and defendant intermarried ,and ever since have veen, and now Second. That the plaintiff is and has been a resijient of the State of North Carolina for the period of two years immediately preceeding the commencement of thie lay of Feby 1906., defend- Nith out cause abandoned plaintiff ,refused to live + fy) with him and left the home of Plaintiff and soon thre- after left the State of North Carolina e plaintiff is , hat or e lay of 194|., a6 well as On other daya before and gince said late while residing ix the unty Of lredell, State aforesaid ,defendant commit- ted adultery with one Earnest (yers ,and that on the Az > > BE P mt -. fi - a ~~ Sl6l Fifth. That each and all of said acts of adultery were committed without the consent ,connivance ,privity or procurement of the plaintiff ,and that plaintiff has not cohabited with defendant since the discovery by him of the commission by the defendant of the said acts of adul- tery aforesaid, Wherefore plaintiff demands judg- ment that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved and annulled and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper, PS y Cal} Attorneya for plaintiff. E.L.Airkman , after being duly sworn says;that the facts set forth in the complaint are true to the best of af- fiants knowledge ,information and belief ,that said compl- aint is not made out of ievity or by collusion between the plaintiff and defendant ,nor for the mere purpose of veing freed and separated from each other ,but in sincer- for the casues mentioned in said complaint. hat the facts set forth for in gaid complaint as ‘rounds for divorce have existed to plaintiff's knowledge for Six months prior to the filing of this complaint and the igsueing of the summons in this proceeding ,and that plaintff is now,and has been for more than two years im iediately preceeding the filing of thie complaint, a res- j e 2 State of North Carolir Sworn to and subscribed before me thia the lay of ¥¢ 1914. ’ W t ; AL¢, ) z / __ ee Ree. LOZ Oy ™~— ’ —e . j ‘ueunTy ‘q Ueunpry rj) U4) eup Sl6l wupy “UeUyITY ‘SA “| “g WRU Sl6l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant ...above named, if. tha. be found within your Gpunty, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of. 4 at the Court House in J atraivet- on the ro Monday after the..." Monday of __ the same being the 14 day of 4d} 1g yf, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant .take notice if bhi _they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this z ¥ day of They IgI st <~>—County. Clerk of Superior Court 3-15- 13-1M. was ; paalsoay “""90} BIQeaIN}ey “JO yU0D Jousdng ay3 jo eee ‘AaITIA AOI SNOW *‘Adu10}Y S,yuUietg jo Aep si} PUI a10Jaq paqliosqns pue 0} IOMS ‘suoljndexe wooly ydurexa Ajsadoid pue saijtiqet| ‘s}qap sty aAoqe puke 49A0 SIe{[Op paspuny OM} JO UNS 34} YOM st oq SX¥S MOMS Su1eq ({e9g) (jeg) (1e@g) 161 ‘q ‘V jo Aep SI} ‘s[vas pus Spuey INO ssonzyIM *"MO1}08 SITY} UI yuareld 24} jo 1aA0001 Aevum JUBpUajeg 3}.Sse ys00 yons |[® juvpuajag ay3 Aed [eqs nr yuarelg oy) ff ‘aAaMoYg ‘pIOA aq 03 ‘sIe[[OG “JO WINS 94} Ut ‘MOTjOB SIq} Ut yuepusjeg 343 “OJUN pUNog SeAlasino sSpa;MouyIe 3M LSNIVOV (-Ayunod | ‘“NITONVD HLNON JO AL¥LS ‘yInoD s0LadNg ay} Uy eupy ‘UeUIyITYy ‘SA “TG ‘UeWyIry Sl6l Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. ot 5-15-'07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF....... 77 CALLA next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of........... L btalefr peidatbe sea ig ei en ag in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein... PRR Ks OOM ic en i he abeeld pea cee a ii, Tee. Sia een eae Defendant... nd this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, ... FAA I / Pe Ul once acaccsas seis. Loicinlicdidil Lele etchalses iadtssecs , Clerk of our said Court, at office 1 io BO ho ye FIN a anaccsaninnessicchcintioslen a een Ge wtih ilove eager Clerk Superior Court for eupy ‘UeUDTY ‘SA “TF UeUyry Sl6l A lo~ &/aS ar ee a aie eee ey ’ i Ge Pian. i Plaintiff } peigooddabaenenssonsadendletdenes, de AUBRRS DEBE cnccne vases | Meeved [ieat} | 1G | hey, Aecacd ch Hee ihe | Mah Uh chdlagy | a ooh. : 9 ncSaaibray | « yy bb bit 8 ; Foto | Aten —— ae eciaimidimmaasimee cameme aa co orice peace uae ee a ee a eupy ‘UeUyTy ‘SA “TF SUeUTy Sl6l North Carolina | Superior Court Iredell County | May Term,1914. A E. L. Kirkman ( vs | I-8s6:.0:238. Edna Kirkman | Were the plaintiff and defendant intermarried as alleged _in the eomplaint ? Answer 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years preeeeding the commencement of this eetion ? Answer AMG Did the defen eommit adultery with Earnest Meyers as is alleged in the eomplaint ? answer 7? a eupy ‘UeUyITYy ‘SA “TG UeWyITYy SI6l S a mrs ilies 19: 1S" O-% Jee. 4 Clana ea foes [4 we Ope: peta oe Compe Cetin. ik Tn Le, via, wae JKS ite os tue po Ae teed | “Tt D0 THe sei Big aeente aL Ba dhate of Wate Le | te Af & Ont Pry ae {eter ~ Poe eu gual, Ges ete ote f hited War eo” | ~ w Attn ¢ +t. kn ZZ. ine ccntinenies Lhhid ives, Gay * ul ee ch Stay Te lt. fied atinat fol AA. nine, dhe fie vupy UeunpTly ‘SA “J “G UeUTy Slé6l LEIA | a . ; T A Aes Nit Kirkman, E. L. vs. Kirkman, Edna 1915 rr Te LOR TN aT em Te ee ey ee SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 3-29-'011M County.~- In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the Defendant above named, if iE be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judgeaf£our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of bree at the Court House in lol. tL on the er Monday after the / =n Monday of CLt the same being the 2 9 and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the be Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendunt take notice if fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint, , day of ... Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this i... day of Qt 190 & Clerk of Superior Court County. ‘AA “OPH ‘SA W'S ‘PE 9061 324 pm IU VY wD ae i ee oe eee x ‘S3eoTI NW ea aoe GivceiragtineBnmanea vara ASM, ~paaras ~ ZL LPR Propooy 0} JQeuinyy LSNIVOV $ I ‘Wud3y, 73g U4 jo junoD IoLsdng 9a} Jo ‘Adus10}}Y SqUuret yA ‘Ajyunod JHTIY YOd SNOMWDS ig Veen oy 061 9 - fo hop S14} aul a4Ofaq Pagisasqns puv 07 ULOMS ‘suongnoaxa wots ydwaxa fijsadoad pun saipinqny ‘s7qap sty anogv pun 4an0 SaDjjop pazpuny omy yo wns ay) yjom s1 ay shins usoms Burag ("798S) (-yoag) ("7ag) 061 ‘a ‘¥ fo hop SI} ‘sjpas pud SpuDYy 4no ssaUuziMy “UO1j9D SIY) UI Siyapg ay} fo 4an0004 fivw uD ~puafag ay] 8D 7809 Yans 1)D juvpuasog ay) fod jjpys Syuwig ayy fi ‘4anamoy ‘pron aq 0] ‘s4anjjoq JO WNS ay) Ul ‘UO1JOD S1yy ul quDpuafeg ay} ojun punog $4Njasino ab paymouyon am LSNIVOV \ "‘ALNNOI 74n0) s014adng ay} uy *YNITIONVOD HLYON AO ALVYLS "IA OPUy ‘SA "W'S “9p 9061 ; North carolina J In the Superior Court q Iredell County { (October Term, 1906. S. M. Krider I vs 1 COMPLAINT, ; W. E. Krider, i a The plaintiff complains and says: --First-- That she and the defendant intermarried on the 6th day of August ,1896 in Rowan County, State of North Carolina; that there was born to herself and the defendant as her husband, 4 child now about six years old in the possession and under the control of the plaintiff. --Second-- That on the 10th day of pebruary, 1901, the defendant, W. BE. Krider unlawfully, wilfully abandoned this plaintiff and her child without any cause whatever for his so doing; that since said date he has absented himself from her, contributed nothing to her su port or that of the child, and as the plaintiff is informed and believes ,ims contrary to law married in the State of Louisana and is there now living as the husband to another than.this plain- tiff. --Third-- That the plaintiff has been a resident of the State of Norh Carolina, all her life, more than two years next preceeding the filing of this Complaint, and that the facts hereinafter set forth have existed to the best of her knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this Complaint. aA “SOPH ‘SA W'S “SOpuy 9061 ‘a A PH ‘SA “W'S SOpuy 9061 Wherefore, the plaintiff. demands judgments --First-- That the Bonds of watrimony existing between herself and the defendant W. FE. Krider, be disolved, and that she be de~ clared free, and discharged from any and all responsibility to and liability of the defendant. --Second-- That the Court decree the plaintiff the proper custo- dian of the child, the off-spring of the marriage. --Third-- And for such other and further relicf as may be just and right. at, S. M. Krider, being duly sworn deposes and says, that the facts set forth in the above entitled Complaint are true to the best of her information, knowledge and belief, and that the said Complaint is not made out of levity or by colusion between her husband and herself; not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and in truth, for the causes mentioned in the Complaint; that-said facts set forth have existed to her knowledge for more than Six months prior to the filing of the Complaint, and that she, as Complainant has been a resident of the said State of North Carolina for more than two years next prececding the filing of the Complaint. SS) Gn Mec, Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 12th day of September, 1906. Qaida LAC. “a “A Jp ‘SA “W'S JOP 9061 North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County Oetober Term, 1906. Se M. Krider vs AFFIDAVIT. W. KE. Krider S. M. Krider being duly sworn that in the above entitled action now pending in the Superior Court of yrede1l County, the sheriff of the said County has returned the Summons issued to him in said action, enioaed ®. KE. Krider, is not to be found in the County of Iredell; that the defendant therein eannot after due diligence be found within the State;that said defendant is a proper party to said action; that said action is brought for the purpose of dissoiving thes bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant. Wherefore, the plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of the summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County. KL GA_SK. ole eis Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 12th, day of September, 1906. Lutlditetez AZ North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County October perm, 1906. S. M. Krider I vs i ORDERe W. HE. Krider ' It appearing from the affidvait of S. M. Krider , that W. EK. Krider, the defendant therein , is not to be found in Ire- dekl County, and cannot after due diligence be found in the State, and it further appearing that a cause of action existing in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. It is therefore ordered that Notice of this action be pub- lished once a week for six weeks in the Mascot, a newspaper publish ed in Iredell County, setting forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same together with a brief recital of the subject matter of the same, and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to be held bn the 29th day of october, 1906 , at the Court House in said County, and answer or demur to the Complaint of the plaintiff or the re- lief there demanded will be granted. This the 12th day of Spetember, vee “ {A 1 nad ‘aM “PH ‘SA “W'S “PU 9061 vs Krider. First:- Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as al- leged in the Complai nt? Answer:= Second:- Did the defendant W. ER. Krider abandon the plaintiff and fail to contribute to her support as alleged in the Complaint? Answer:>- Third:- Has the plaintiff been a resident of North carolina for more than two years next preceeding the filing of the Complaint? Answer:- Fourth:- Have the facts set forth in the Complaint existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months prior to the filing of the Complaint ? Answer:- Krider, S. M. vs. Krider, W. E. 1906 North Carolina In the Superior Court Tredell County October Term, 1906. 1 Krider 7 vs }. JUDGMENT. Krider t This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor Furgeson, hdage, and a Jury, and being heard upon the whole Record and the issues submitted , and the Jury having answered the issues in favor of the plaintiff: It is , therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved, and that the plaintiff be declared free and discharged fromeny and all liability and responsibility to the said W. %. Krider, because of her marriage with him. It is further considered by the Court that the plaintiff child born Sg, M, Krider have the possession of and control of the to herself and the defendant, W. FH. Krider, absolutely - Judge Pre@iding. i OF ad | ‘SA ‘W'S OPH 9061 Krider, S. M. vs. Krider, W. E. 1906 : sh On Dan! 90g — Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Prirted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. County. Po Against Judgment Against ‘aA Jp 9061 Original Summons, or other original process, including all names therein... Every copy of same..... ....... Appeal from @erk to Judge....... Order for enlarging time of pleading... MIRO OER ONT AIPIINIG ccc cssasssssveasenbacdiae’ dbvccuecguncecdchdianepericenseessepee “Attachment, Order in.... Injunction Order, including Bond and andyJustifigation Subpoena, each DAMe.........c:cccce seecersanees coos Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian, 2. ..........c.ssc0eeseeree Continuance.. ........... ploneesepenspepenoonansnnaanesnnanes: esnneescnsonssnenpeooos scenes Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing................sssesssesseeeee PIE CIN Ui covine: sinois cased: casalingohancedshcedecapeancs bongo scosnver Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate....... .......000.ccsessseseeees Sn PT IN IIS Ol iss cccacencrnncacicn: pinvonctics des lhadosoanens PHOGIOD 1c! ac e0k- nntsonsennadebsonessese. pueden sinenghosensdecmnebesoceceaon covers. snereees ° Notice, for each name over One in BAME PAPET...... ........s00eceee-000 OE BRIE Fi costhibissncsessisesen esvcssuion, shakabchenevinsiad sereccoubsleaiens Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided ............. ING TG OR COTE BNI eos cccsstcesccccicactn Sqiccessondnnovcns tcnsen senses RISE PEE OPTI IIOEE ccsicezssenoncesciccsessoisncecsscs :ncosceosesoumsccees Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support............0. ses see I ee aes sce Docketing ex parte Proceedings “ FN ask sticiansenssbsandenins sce tebseteptbeuotons endeosnscoevcinie: eee “ PEE SB enccscctescsceress. cnsenseee:, cnsereotussonidatetyeueh sapoopecoenese FHI PAPO ..20000 00000. .ercseseccsecerssscores sommbvesmoniiossscesens eniose detssibeees Tremmasins Of TOAMUOM,. .01.0..c0cisessee. cose ssccesecccscnecosesencccebesesese Execution Wi Sheriff's Return...........ccccsccsssesssssseese vessneeseen sows Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal....... ... Transcript to Supreme Court............ copy sheets, each County Tax, when Jury impaneled.................cccccsseoesseee coveseeevees Referes’s AMOWAMCS......cccccccceccsssees seecsccecces seve eocceocscoeccosooosensceee BIEN cinink scenctainiinnents deni sonceiiiepuntihepbhierenesiie bin. sim oianeebened, eabpsees ‘ Magistrate. TE PIII nsacinses ‘dickdnunbebotioniadi-nen dumnneensitebiensttinesedbiond $1.00 1.00 A ete CIVIL DOCKET. | » BILL OF COSTS-CIVIL. 4x. | (As fixed by the Code.) I perpen ees cnatavacn ae sncnessnctsnorpareotivenieioaass OTE, 100... Krider. S. M. vs. Krider, W. E. 1906 Maat, che Amc tf cn annchoath : er “oy Com om ln Cur Beas Lat of Atal ete Pot et son 8 ‘a ued Saeed. ot, (ails Bh tala 2 t 3 Laat Ao Dne hespictieig sills, settle aaa SEES one 4 4 5 7 th, obec Sort ee phen, Wee pe ein wae etalk ull ase ae “— Avinel pen 7. obrts Chu a A 7 he ett reel . are Ze “Zarrc& ng mats oe ' beth oat, 7, . ee ol p-p—~ - | a Pe ei fo Ma tS YG | A Jen. & He, Se a 2 2 shy oh Jl ntY.te' ~ dh fo levi nin mt 4% e. ‘LF ore eats Aes ooestiaes nce Mi o ommok ’ 7. pe ott Fon al ber. {io afin Hasso es | mer Se OE De A ee ee ee ce ee anf om otek wn ek J. i esa usaiae me Deco a te ol ik cee Hh at Vale font ot pon TL ae ¢ Leas th Corr Ab aint ee fe ry : ' ; ) ; i Fone od Ww Oman o oleae Cow a Sana ase sy aw A HET” 4g hae Lltir woe ie ae ap Ton ere fo “. ae rey t a Lin~ 5 g oF “Minin CAA ee Caan : © (Lev own y athe eAX| ed WA Rot CFESA LA. EH Ax 77 aling A Wu JETT . ene V anche Z ( ‘i ay saa 7 _ ta ¢ sede SOMO Vi) Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C 2M—5—,04. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Yr ke sh County--GREETING: the Court House in on the. nite 29 2h Any acentim of next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in befialf of..." aN. i KQ. eather oe Bf gs Bf gx < SI6l Defendent ., Clerk of our said Court, at office in ee —Memdarmta— Witness ~f-—:...¢4....< JM oY Ale QAAL 143A. L.¥. Lackey { Vs. { Annie Lackey { Ist. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Ans. a end. Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of Yorth Varolina for two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Ans. : 3rd, Did the gefendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? North Carolina, { In the Superior Court, Iredell County. { January Term,1915, L.M. Lackey { Vs. { JUDGHENT., Annie Lackey { This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard before his Honor, T.J. Shaw, Judge Presiding, and a jury, md the jury having answered the issues submitted to them by His Honor as folbows, to-wit:"Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer Yes""Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of the State of=North Varolina for two years next preceeding the com= mencement of this action"? Answer Yes","Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? andwer Yes", And it appearing to the Court that summons in this cause has been duly made jby publication as required by law; it is adjudged by the Court that servise of summons has been duly made by publication, It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the beads of matrimeny existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be,and the same are hereby desolved, and the plaintiff is granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with the defendant, It is futher ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this action as taxed by the Clerk of This Court. Filial: Shs ity Judge Pygsiding. L.M. Lackey Vs. Annie Lackey ZUDGY ENT. Lackey, L. M. vs. Lackey, Annie 1915 Bill of Costs—Civil.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N, C. | oe See or other original process, er, on | Every copy of same | Bond, including Justification IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. prec: trom justices | Appeal from Clerk to Judge Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders ..County. Attachment, Orderin. ........ * junction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . Order of Arrest Subpoena, cach name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian... .... . Qaveat to a Will, entering and docketing | Issuing Commission Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Judgment Against "— Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . ‘|| Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk j Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . ... . . Docketing ex parte Proceedings ms Judgment Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgm ; Execution ayd)Shefiff’s Return ‘ Aphd | toSuprengé Lourt, including Certificate and Seal 2. Tramp pkeme Court . TAG NL aty) x, Referee's Allowance Constable. ... Magistrate Plaintiff's Witnesses. . CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) —~ Term, 191 .. Lackey, L. M. vs. Lackey, Annie 1915 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. ..County.-~ In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant ....above namet, if... be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of y, our Superior Court, ata a Court to besheld for-.te County of at the Court House i in f\ mA Quis, 1") KAO: Lon “the lt Monday after the ut ~ the same! being the’. / [.....day of KALLA: which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of uperior Court for said Codtity, within the first three’ days of said Term, and let said Defendant take Tidtice if they fail to answer to the said complaint’ within that time, the pleintiff........will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make. due\return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this Z Wa day of / s mie hod LAhsDd Clerk of Supe , County. Wet] “SOUDIMe] ‘SA WIBSepy ‘SousMe’y Clél WIRITTI AA “SOUDIMe’] ‘SA 13SeP “SOUDIME’] Clél ; 2 } oe | -F —F a de ok Ss g Re = qt a: Ss = . om at ae iy = = of = By |. | wo: : : g ened u > | Se pa => } QO - re | a i B 3 Z < | { ee Se eae “a ae “"“$E]} BUI s1OJeq pequiosqns pue 0} WIOMS *suoljndexs wi0Iy }dutexa Aj1adoid pue SII} IQeI] ‘syqap Sty aAOge pu I3A0 SI¥[[Op pezpuny OM} jo Uns 34} 40M st ay Shes MIOMS BUTaqu re (‘peag) sialidepacaipaasnighinle scbdebrcacbeitaacbapiieMeceueapuskeibtccdeidide dulce aide (‘jeag) ieshphabisanbaditnsinnotdeicenmaionssahemetpninssapelineaciassepenihecetbwidieanin (‘eag) Siiatitnoandehsowembastionseninsgehenenamebetioiialiienbdaensmiiénendcenstiehibnenns : anneenrenien OF VE Ws> tT, “ . a ee pue spuey ino ssanjI My “mO}}08 S1q} Ur “"BHUre[_A 243 JO 12a0001 Avr yuepmazagq 34} Se ys00 yons ire duiececacngnenoesit quepuajag au) hed [reys ebisntnoressenbonngendinniaiien edenstdehehhinelhacineivecuiaabasteecsinie chetijsninncinai poureyg au} i ‘TaAaMoY ‘pIOA aq 0} ‘s1e]10q PPOOS Pon cernocccorsngocssnceqoossonebooecoeosonegenoescotcouesosseosnécorncoboonesneoooseeeee jo uns aq) ur ‘no108 Stq3 ure" }Uepaajeg a3 coeccecccses ccececccccocessosos eccccee ececrccocoocccoces cove ee secee Socccccoscoccoocoscce ecove ““OUUN punoq S9A[ISINO a3pe| Mou ye 2M ] | GNO& LISNIVOV ‘Ayunog ‘No? Joyedng 94) UY] ‘ “¥NINIONYO HLYON JO GL¥LS WRIT, “SOUSIMe’T] ‘SA a1dBePy ‘DOUDIMe’] cl6l oc -1§- 13-1M. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C 3 a : . S = <° 3 S : 2 x 7 egg oF Zwirner AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant .. above named, if. he -be found within eae to be and Pp before the Judge of our Spperior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of... <A 2-C. R LL ‘at the Court House in Malet Ts a LAM YANAL Ad. = on the «=....Monday after the the same being the LG... day of ZL. which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk’of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant.......take notice if... -they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. ; Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. : ee L 191 x. Clerk of Superior Court CLMA. i t keounty. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this... Z ae Ch WII, ‘2ousIMe’T ‘SA BIBBeyy “DOUDIMe’] cl6l NNS 8 Pe 2 9 : ® me = oe ie ea s : ; a, WD > ; o S\ale * & iY i: ee Po a : ' i ee ; ANN 3 ° a ' i ; ° Not ASS | Ue o = in {beac d | © ; : ‘ e Na | a 5 ‘lbs banat ape 3 a eh g g iL Ll bo . | ; : Oo Oa < . \ » ee ais 161 yo Aep” SI} SUI as0Jaq paquosqns pue 0} TIOMSG ‘suorjnoaxe wily 3dmaxa Aysadoid pue sartiiqet| ‘siqep Si aA0qe pur 1940 | Siv[JOp paspuny OM} Jo WINS 94} 40M St oq shes uioms 3u1sq | (1e9S) (19g) (189g) 161 ‘qd ‘Vv jo Aep Sty} ‘s[vas pue spuey Ino ssanzI "aorjoe Sq} Ur yuyarel[g 24} Jo JaA0001 Avut JUBPUaJeg {3} SB SOD yons |e juepuajeq ay} Aed [[eqs yuurerg oq} jt ‘seAsmoy Dee Oe ee ee oe jO Wins dy} Ur ‘MOTOR Sty} Ut yuepuejeg 24} 0JUN puNog saajasino adpa;mouyAoe 9M, ‘"GNOe : LSNIVOV ‘Ayunod vanog oHedNS OH NT | NIOUVOD HLYON 4O FL¥LS ‘ North Carolina | In the Superior Court. Iredell County | May Term,1913. Maggie Lawrence i --VS-- j COMPLAINT, Will Lawrence I The plaintiff complaining of the defendant,alleges: (Pirst). | That on or about the ----day of October 1904,in the County of Iredell;North Carolina the plaintiff and defendant were married and lived together as man and wife until the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in September of 1907. (Second). That during the month of September 1907 the defendant ,Will Lawrence,without any cause or reason whatever and without any fault on the part of the plaintiff,left his home and abandoned the plain- tiff,and at the same time taking up with another woman by the name of Laura Jordan,with whom said defendant committed fornication and adultery and has ever sinee,until his arrest for the violation of Law,sometime last year,lived in the unlawful relation of fornication and adultery,thus totally disregarding the solemnity of the mariiage | Vowe (Third). That the plaintiff Jas not received the defendant in conjugal embraces since her knowledge of his conduct and since he abandoned her as above alleged ° (Fourth) That the plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceeding the commenc- ) ment of this action. (Fifth). That the facts set forth and contained herein as a complaint have existed,to the knowledce of the plaintiff,for smore than six months next preceeding the comm encment of this action. WHEREFORE the plaintiff demands judgment that she be granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with the defendant. r . , org Y Aes PB is _—_——— WeI]IA\ ‘SoUDIMe’T ‘SA TSepy ‘SOUDIME’] cl6l WIRI]]IA\ ‘SouUDIMe’y ‘SA ABTepy “DousIMe’] cl6l Maggie Lawrence being duly sworn,deposes and says;that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of her knowledge: and belief and that the compleint is not made out of levity or collu- sion between herself and the defendant,and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other,but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint;that the fasts set forth in the complaint as grounds for divorece,have existed,to affiants knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this com- plaint and that the plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of the State of North Oareliné “Ser more than two years prior to the filing Sworn to and subscribed before me this t Sra day of & pi? 3 erk Sugerior Court. cack of the complaint. Lawrence, Maggie vs. Lawrence, William 1913 ‘f UY ‘ousmey ‘SA “TW “oousmey] 9I6I State of North SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C. ——— Srrvotset, County—In the Superior Court. ~*~ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. . To the Sherif of CACA<eC-e¢ ——_County_GREETING : Payee co YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to summon the defendant__ above named, if be found within your Cepnty , be and appear before the Judge of irc t fhe Court House in County of- our Superior Coury, ata Court to be held for t OS aeeLe on thet ds he. Monday of the same being the 2A -_dyy Te nal 191%, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if. will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- “erk of the Superior Coyrt for said County, within the first Ri. ke fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Y fae. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this / 453 S}q9P STY eAoqe puB JaA0 4 pupby Term, 1916. trot LLGounty OJUN PUNOG S9A[ESINO BSpelMouyoR oy Sureq ops Mate a eee Cee ty gee teen ee aaa ene VYNIIONVS HLYON JO ALVLS ~~" yo Avp------~~sryg ‘spees paw SpuBy Ino sseujzT Ay ee ee “WOTow Sty} UT ~—"--~ BUTE 94} JO 19A000er Avut -----~quepuezeq oy} sv ys00 ‘suOT}Noexe Woy ydulexe Ajsedoid pue sortiqer "J4nog sorsadngy ay} uy mM = z eo 2 © S Q x = z ° 3 @ B ® co e. a ' ' i ' ! ; ' ou © “<< = on ' ' ! ' ! ! ! ! ' ! ' ' ! i ! ' i ! ! i : ! ! pt = — eipuny OM} JO Wns oy} YIAOM st oy SABS TAIOMS OR Se srt re a oe eee ee een ~~" "S30 WINS 94} UT “MoOT}OR Sty} Ul ~~~~juBpuezeq ou} yous [[@ ~~~~-~~guepuezeq 943 Aed OM ent a ee Rt oq} jt ‘T9AeMOY SIB]jOp Pp Cn ee eee ena eand Plaintiff’s Attorney. Lawrence, M. L. Vs. Lawrence, R. J. 1916 Ty “SOUSIME] ‘SA “T ‘ZW “oousmmey] 9161 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County August Term,1916. Mrs.Lottie Lawrence ,Plaintif?f R.J. Lawrence, Defendant. { That the plaintiff complains of the defendant and says: --First-- That she and the defendant married on the 15th day of August,1914, and lived together as man and wife until Septenm- ber, 1915, --Second-- That between the date of the Marriage aforesaid and September ,1915, and since said dates, the plaintiff was a true and faithful wife to the defendant, but the defendant committed fornication and adultery with parties to this plaintiff unknown, and committed other acts of illicit inter- course; that she was compelled to deny further marriage privileges to him, and since said time has not in any manner lived with him as his wife, nor asked support of him. --Third-- That she is now, and has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for a number of years. WHEREPORE, the pleintiff demands judgment: That *he bonds of matrimony existing between herself and the defendant be dissolved; that she recover her cost in her behalf expended and go hence without day. A 4 ‘5 ounse ° e plain . ‘f YU ‘sousimey] ‘SA “T ‘ZW ‘oousmme’y 9161 Lottie Lawrence, the plaintiff, being duly sworn,says, that the facts set forth in the complaint are true,to the best of her knowledge and belief; that said complaint is not made ont of levity, or by cdlusion between herself and her husband, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the Complaint; that the facts set forth as grounds for divorce haved existed bho her knowledge more than six months, prior to the filing of the Complszint, and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the Staite of North Carolina for more than two gears next preceding the filing of the Complaint. Sworn to sand subscribed, before me this the £2 aay of ‘te ----,1916. Uist TA “QOUSIME’] ‘SA “T ‘CW ‘souommey 9161 North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County Mrs. Lottie Lawrence,Plaintiff - -¥S- R.J. Lawrence, Defendant. Le Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry,as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Ur 2. Did the defemiant abandon the plaintiff and commit fornication and adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: ve 3. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State for two years next preceeding the bringing of this action? Answer: h4 ( f Y ‘sousmey ‘SA “T ‘W “oousmmey 9161 RP EEE NRT HMR Cs in le ae me i = gt Si f Y ‘eousimey ‘SA "TW “sousime’y 9161 North Carolina Iredell County Mrs. Lottie Lawrence wetaw JUDGMBNT., R.J. Lawrence, This cause coming on to be heard Before His Honor Prank Carter, Judge and a jury upin the whole record and the issues submitted ,and the jury having found the issues as follows: wl.Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as al- leged in the Company? Answer Yes. 2. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and commit fornication and adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yes. S. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State for two years next preceeding the bringing of this action? Answer : Yes." It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be ,and the same are hereby dissolved. iain & ¢ = x ~ i esiding. Hie . wudge Me. £47 Mrs. Lottie Lawrence ~vs- R.J. Lawrence JUDGMENT Reenter le Lawrence, M. L. vs. Lawrence, R. J. 1916 SIdUBI] “IOtBIQouT] ‘SA OIpN’] “Jorwoqgout’] Li6l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N, C. __tpepexn ~~ County—In the Superior Court. A: iedie Lies Ag aInne SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. i ae Francis.Hinebeaier_________________--_ Sof ee ee ee Sahepieleon tence se fc Loaner son " State of North Carolina. To the Sherif of i .8o3 BEAK iDavie a County—GREETING cr YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED Res bo A a a a ee 2 _....‘Erang4s Linebeaier Be Me) kt re a ee ag ee ee ee Bk oy et ee Rae gk Se our Superior Court, at a Court te be held for the County af. es oan at the Court House in Statesyille,N.C..,, the 2LtKfonday after the...18% Monday of _._March, ig the same being the-2latday of --May,-....--....-..-- 1917_.., and answer the complaint, a copy * which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant- ---- take notice if_._J40___mpqmfail@o answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff-..-- will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this- £OtD aay 6f):..Sanes--= Aig —~LB fy akevog Se ae ee gl a a ices ‘ 4 . 3 4 $ “4 ; D 3 ; : 3 “4 ; 3 ; o4 > " » — ; pane ' gee Yoel asad entvemernerennthin lll nents erent Ria tai , SUMMONS: FOR RELIEF. ~4 =-Term, 191-7_- r ox Returnable to.- May aaaeneaacaennnaanaaa==== ¥9 ABP"--~~"""SIY} OU B10Joq Peqiiosqns pus Oo} UIOMg 161 ‘suoljnoexe Woy yduiexe Ajsodoad puv sarjtIqet] ‘s}qop sty eAoqe pu aeA0 preg etree SAB[[Op peapuny OM} JO wns oy} YOM st oy SARS UIOMS 2 ("[Beg) ~~ ("[Bag ) ) (“[Re ‘s[ve8s PUY Spuvy Ino sseuyT “ ~T FO ABP ~~~ >" SIyg 16t “dG 'v"~ "UOTjOW SITY} UT ~-~---YuUre[g ey} Jo tea00e1 ABU ~-~~~-~juBpuezeqy oy} se 4s00 Or te terete err at Per “BuUreld oy} Jt ‘1Teaemoy yons []@ ~----“juepuezeq oy} Aed [jeys---------- “JO WINS OY} UT “MOT}OR Sty} UI ~--~zUBpUezaqy oy} aq 0} ‘saeyjoq--~ PIOA “-=====<o40M pUnog SaAjesINO aSpe;MouyOe oy bid a be B Lalla le Oe ate \ “utdNvd V SV ZHONOUA LINS XEYK jsumby ‘ANO& VYNI'IOMNV)O HLYON AO ALVLS ) 4nsadngy ay} uy | "Ano; Linebeaier, Ludie vs. Linebeaier, Francis 1917 sisuel “Joreoqour’y] "SA SIPN’] “Jorvoqoul’] Li6l North Carolina | In the Superior Court Iredell County i May Term,1917 . Ludie Linebeszier { Francis Linebeaier 4 The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges: --Pirst. -- ‘ Discerrk That on or about the 14th day of April,1908, in lretezti County, State of North Carolina, the plaintiff and defendant 4intermarried and lived together as man and wife until the defendant abandoned the plaintiff on the ------ day of ,1912, and they are now man and wife. “2a =e SOS ~-Second-= That sometime prior to the ---- day of wnannnne-on-, 1912, as above set forth the defendant, without any cause oT amd without any fault on the part of to shamefully reason whatsoever, the plaintiff, began to neglect, mistreat and abuse the plaintiff by abandoning his home, neglecting and deserting the plaintif?, until on the «----- day ,1912, totally disregarding the solemnity of the marriage vow, the aefendant entirely left and abandon- ed the plaintiff and wilfully and without cause took up with and committed torn pate and adultery with one Maude Stewart } Morn ke and others,, who then lived in Posatas—L— County, which relation continued , State of to exist, constantly and habitually for 4 period of about three months, and defendant then left the State and County and now Live somewhere unknown to plaintiffudLt a About tom, a: Whew Le niitinial, @ He; RD, s1oueI.J “JoIeoqout’y ‘SA OIpN’] “Joreoqout’] LI61 --Third-=- That the plainti f has not received the defendant ‘in congugal embrages since her Imowledge of his conduct and since he abandoned her as set out above. --Fourth-- That the plaintiff has been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceding the commencement of this action. ~-Fifth-- That the facts set forth and contained herein have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months next preceding the commencement of this action: WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands Judgment that she be granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with the defendant. hecrp rates bess Attorneys for the Plaintiff. Ludie Linebeaier, being duly sworn, deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true $o the best of her knowledge and belief, and that said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and the defendant, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincera&ty and truth for the causes mentioned in the Complaint. The facts set forth in the complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to affiant's knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this complaint and the plaintiff? has been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the filing of this complaint, and commencement of this action. P Lee a ‘ tonne Srorn to and aubeors, ed be ore me this the Senhin- day of ---wapfeess-t-.--. ,1917. ek ee of A ¢ “0 lat, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleced in the complaint? Ans, rom, ; pune and, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North | : a q Carolina for two vears ext, preeeedang the bringing of this 4 action? siduel.{ ‘Jo1eaqout’] ‘SA OIpn’y] “Joreoqour’y Li6l stouvI.] “Jo1eoQout’] ‘SA OIPN’] “Joreaqout’y LI6! North Carolina, { In the Superior Court, Iredell Gounty. { August Term, 1917, Ludie Linebearier { Vs, { JUDGMENT, Francis Linebeaier { This Cause coming on to be heard at this Term of he Superidér Court of Iredell County, North Carolima,and being heard before His Honor,E.B.Gline, J presiding, and the juror,hafter being sworn) and eanisaied. havi answered the issues as follows: lst. Did chai phatueare and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? = ’ Ans, "YES" 2nd, Has the plaintiffheen a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceeding the bringing of thés action? Ans, “YES" 3rd, Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the complaint? Ans, "YES" It is therefore, order,ad judged and decreed by the Court that the bonds of matrimonyhheretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be, and the dine are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff is is granted an absolute divorce from the defendant. jIt is futher ordered the plaintiff pay the costs, CFBC ks ————jUDGE PRESIDING. 2 - od > é . 3 es a 3 3 fy a4 “ 4 © a ; ; a 3 : rao @ ; p : 4 3 : . e . a . > ion 3 ’ 5s — a ee Ludie Linebeaier > . 4 > - Seg 7 : r 4 . es ng . So “ ee 2 3 5 - 2" : +3 a tg es ‘ ° ; 5 . per ; Ss (3 er _ -, Francis Linebeaier ; Ss wg % > ween . e ef - es ; Ms i 3} ‘ 2 é o ;" “4 al . : ae ee Pt ve a . se 2 * 5 ag = “ o » = @UDGMENT, ce © =f — — - 4 7 f < c “ae € ; ~ , ge + : 3 . t ° on s = é & bo oad ; : P- i ; se tn 3 : } -% ; i . 5 | 3 = ‘cag S < : : | x " a. ~ — z t J = I we " - fe > * 2 . 4 gz rt - _ ot : : a Fe - ge 4 . -_ : - D - e-4 2 + 4 ct oe , 5 s i - en = : “8 tt 2 2 an c _ . = 3 4 Ri R 2 * - . . = 5 > 3 < “ v a 3 : ae © 8 ‘ es ~~ 2 - : — Py - f = > un . c ™ -- - e : = © fs Linebeaier, Ludie vs. Linebeaier, Francis 1917 stduelJ “Joreoqoul’] ‘SA OIpN’] “Joreaqoul’y LI61 Against Judgment Against Attachment, Orderin. ..... Phi gee wala aioe ty Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . Notice, for each name over one in same paper. .... - Impaneling Jury... . - sce eset re erens Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment finalintermtime.....- +--+ ++:+> Judgment final before Clerk... © 2 - - ee eee Judgment in favor of Widow's Year’s Support. .... . ROURT NOD 5 es kc bes oc ee a ge eee keting ex parte Proceedings. ....-..-+-+-++-+ Tee TE ook a ie eas eh ew 8 arom ae a NR gals a bg Seles wire pede eM Te ie Transcript of Judgment #oxeentionmmd Sheriff’s Return. . ... . - 6 6 2 ee Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each.. = -10}). Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00} _ County Tax, when Juryimpaneled.....--+--+--: 3.00 Dateses’e ANOWONCE . 2 wee et te a Sh ee ke ele abe WO: tes yy Lew Oe Oke UL ee COR Sy 6 Ki ee eo tere e 6 eine 0s we hoe EE OE ae rr re rk a Defendant's Witnesses. SS ae CIVIL DOCKET. = BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL, (As Fixed by the Code.) Dina ae rac 4 aes ee Term, I9] Linebeaier, Ludie vs. Linebeaier, Francis 1917 ‘eT Zuy1 a at *) sewer freee cer. | ell Jee Pe 4 favuce a ec Z a LOS Afra, Sef the i ahenGo Lace Qvcteccct te thee txcke Degh ter i ei? ceuaidl Se a a. tA nhibt. Hella, Corrine ee yles arn tor bering, — nt elu. her A108 Left ar ater eee freee a Conga beneaehs We Pt Srpir.cle A, ail ei Shah re Ye. 10 oe of Nov we Jews rico nie Bepuclawt, ae ee sie; Hit fafiarat. Cate frre | Lew, ott ~ feveviteiny A + teas Fae | chiélelrae ute ane fect 25, Mesa | list Onritbra fe albert elias << fl | pr wer, «=H Za Ofer - ep let . wy verike Aug flats remiss wer fw, te . i ) a ean! iti ras Tf Le a ff > 1012 & A. ek ee af fi. Cane a sz Sxl) SAL farce CAig le A Ze we CBee tte nt Aa fr fife tuliriel fle heer hore ctrok Ae+4 <> Bt FS Zn ning > eas, LL aa et soe Of a rman e270 tucheziaDt~ Stone Crist Aue Aeeecu11l, Cueg sa is, — Ay fb. pes hy Lo. tC nal lene ly LOC la. > Se: ee ee ay A (Yorn f (ef aG ae * se aw ae a A Acarer.a42ter eee, He, Vereen 'S ae) - P< (Mttriags fire LA. a r. tol fa Rees ie SE Sans tele MR cn a | Aecel % ty Fee cl Yer ~S A. ile fo ? Cttt Zice 44 Rt “ 6 Cet Pea€ (ue ue = 4 nggh anet Of fPvnceac'ew 02k frre aS | Fake Fietong. iti. M Be Jon Ei SB rh ead. 7 OO ee <n ee ~ — WE fe. &H 00-Ki vi le ae , Feces re ple 6a i TE ne a | CEE on MK @ece on | & PLS Pree CU Je Let : et me | fam x ae - tn -+ Aw 14) le. +t es re | Service Fas ~~ Pi a GFE s Soi J Jer AG = i a2 oe C104 bf (F414 a A C - : “ 1H en a “ra tg, ee 7 - esieliecietiicinetiRieehiaa sd ok ia ~ eT ee. <cete«, ye 2 si leh art « Ge (Ponca tozlin ow he fue &H pbh-e ee Vag he fe A epenrh ga Kpny es ee aa LL; Cee . 2c? ( fivec eb > 4A-+ ee e rte ck a. po 2 papi ae ag a et Fr LOTECL 0? PL foe se [ir Fee Fo 120g Caress Kifer Gua) Cl Ac ra Gu, A fpr Prd | : | fant € Li yn porte hg! Say as 41s GP os BE thot % fac’ - eek fort e ee, LOE EL Pie tic frat lv tehiy « Mega £& LL igu B on Bn, ZZ hi tyhleb$ oe a shia’ A Aorrpt pa: a ai. Chi fe Bas a: AM ena: Cone, By pt a 4 me eo nee re 7. we me _ fhe ny, a , 2 Oe A : : ' f > sot ae £7 LY 7) aT Tf FD >7 Y Lf bears hb, ae ’ ; vs. Lingle, James C. lo se eh Wisc, 2b trliek, evct® be fh w ae | hfe Tie att ate” | St y net haf fi Le facl oe A tfifenr Arch oS paet, Crnufileist Tho TlH, tt afffly B lhe Cr4 lo ee eg I Mh wee: eee cetn rs BS Annet we Meese cs | “SA “y years ‘oTSUTT *) sewer ‘eT2ut] Lingle, James C. *) sewer ‘eT2uT] Oe oe pec ee Ce Cee Wt a torkvan an 2 a sh diga, ecole Ps <ficr ok gna erences Ba - lece Pe2L0ffr — <> vA Lowey aineammr .sare wicks wf Wor Fumie HAL BH | acd Cupilaet, ak ru | Renn Of Bef em rm YE hatha bor 6 ify | prays lid | L444, 42 Avg 2 ie) ’ Of fectoorh, K 0? tar of N.. Live la aa ibe Lingle, James C. peecrer At sa coal kag _* a L fu uals co eee bie ae le Le — Cat fooceteor Ge. PES Bun Heisk frD bs Wale tf Cars out —_. Kl. aeees (Eu K Vk ot Lecd Wear ae " Me? ip. “cei De _ ws fe“ 2 of tee? Go Joms ee | Oust be, i Pe akighi. b fisssilen Hi fifo Bt | vee ~ ee Bg Vo. b> Ces > Mean hk. (FRC 7 aS LV \ et Re gluilyy hu, Arb | i ti in oli FA a ene id ase — Mes, Cea Se i kg ate ee Mtenripe ( px 7 Zi oe ms : 3 . Ld) lide < a Ee ge yg - 5 = 7 - Sico Ge2Z-.0 a ll Cena Paes get Close. 22. C- erg Lan 4 Dalton 20e <B, for lia fo ZZ ae Bort 2.27 a22thZA fi-b 2a: 4 22 shee ee —ae-+47 oe Pon we, C2se We-8 Fes *m Asmy u099TT “SA : f" 3 g eo Gene: Me VO" ny of el / SEX ; ce ZB dalle 7 Vy A wee eee, | J. A “mM Feuy *U0UFFT *SA FES... we sigan Qa Hedin t2L.7 eg seg aK @a@aire ae oo tt wl 11. © awe afar eA. o pba Oy i: tot aE ai Ae attest 2A er a or, tayo .- Wh hare ptai-LH7 Sper ait / DBP 2S =. a) a huagn ies | LIerrk Cor Bina Woh | [Se aecee an 3f ue, LM ag ‘ “SA *M F2uy *u0zsTT “J wane] £Uu0z3TT a) |\O ans - ae “Z (Ea coy A oman : : 4 a rc ye ~ a 34 ct ct ° ° 5 Ss —s am s r- =, 7 Litton, Laura L. vs Litton, Amzi W. CT eee A, Ireatgoh 2° “you Bor. bet flees LLe- Ars Hig bore + botkintl por aa: hha tl eels wrel Hen. Cette tie eye Shni— fpr Be. ee. i ow, cae co bhA-bdmin Ee oe - Me 3 le Le facy £ a be fe hoot ~§ iy fei We Wehr Lay Chios Gree lhe fens $93. Liles, WHS flank at- Lier id IgenS atlas Mba) bart hed fA. Mg z& EE FS Cis tpans ail ons : a AT (lack hers Cud— | Fy ane agen Aaaer~ hittheaso- | ha Lime... Whe Mba rt tba | Aig Aff a ten aoe | Avil. a) pvarvude Sa Mis Mbit die. aha. Ae Ba met, ote: Mead 3 Trt bane I OP. OO. OREO ero “wel prfoers tahe, To 4 Te Ari ar CBr Mnpacth tan $ Ayer Fiat do Catag: fork Gan Cun Sent “herr bach: pv Mh Arr pr he ass ws Edited otont A tek eS Oe eczel PLS EA ceux SO a IS5 9S A Nae @WJ@ / Me . - ‘ awe Gin in ADU ry ite ee fe (Le grre an atte gee? Je LAY ’ - (Faz pvx~tgy 4 ee 3 te eeig my ee a ge: Te. alee Yor we *Prwaney ‘u039T1 Litton, Laura L. vs. Litton, Amzi W. mM Famy ‘u044TT “SA Wiw Me ee Bim foer Pu OEE |B eee Brrr Fe LOS bed 2a he Come Boring 0S We Oo a Picts wes Bree bey pe bee a. © 7 je LA oe Dore Dek ll iw a frm, ao lr in ADdulE ry rr K ree Chin ZN [(Vogry ow atig—<7 Mord tn ae? ha pre 6 he Crit hte he a rn Ce the Kia hte | ang hitln~ . ate ow Ans | i? le. Z. ie it &e cae Pee Sa S an a. $e Cle | ie A | % anmManom & heer | 4 lene > | Cha es 13 Pode, 3 ov. stpueg (70350T) UEQZOT. A ¥teqoy *(uo43zoT) uTAzoT oo Dec fel Lorri ky 1 fatag oo pga ! : : | hfe Mah, 21: do alles 0: | 7 Aok ney Cbd th hay K (Jo ae Ai Only x Calaily an8 SOL & tah Laren , folacu lf auk Mf. hauk <le. Ae Kus be he at off, 2% Tak plainly ro au9 hor Geen 2 bore fx weld K Be Sit. of fink Carob = | fr x fiend x O71 Cw hee pr free, ntk Ber: Be Fece 7 De Born sour K Min ales. 2. Jiodk. Daw ar aborrZs eA ay oy Gougk S Gos ch Afler Ba. £ hfe hei SR a Aa ay | eee ae peccde fas LQ Kok falatyy | bo alive) o Kees. a ne Miso e e ae | Acnd> > ee a Caer Maer. is oa: | Gauche Lets nid, @reecewe deeseh cc. Le shan Brn pola ly ak Lor Cefetrale ake ofoak fr Kier arehk med. Gace, Bink agiccied Kat —eetee anh atk 2K a C29 4uS . lib ” Shak her “owy Mo Cece a fae Pacrien. Hilhe. fee he falar hewa Iz Confohace 4 SA erpuey *(uoazeT) urazoq "A Weqoe *(uo3z0T) utazoq Oe LevaclriLe fer R ond 0for Quek ocke wfen Bec ULL 20 mrey KR fed wftrake, . | Sf ae | Cte. gr Mon ee, ae. ate Confalacik ia Aiees fe Oe ee | fn (CL acd fi, dace CiYkllasis, 6 2C Aint Cher af. nor for Be men flflor of Gung fre au Cpfhtrclcd fhm Cok oka. | Cif Len Qece are E> aut Src D> CA cee tin det ie. ae Corrpabaceid Sha free Qk fn eK ti. KE tor flask Min Bid ete ge EP I~ Pro <M. Bee Pee te fotin; Z Zi, rw fla at Lez ; Ac deer tg ema, he cd ome dese fn pow ; ofl, ZH Comaricves csr k F ME an ahec, Of or ohn Pe LV. 7 er es JO CORE on LAS . 222 et Ate E77 "CO Re aos s¥pueg “(uoazor) urazoy “SA 1g A eee © Re ”, Toftin v8 Candis Loftin ISSUES. i Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as me Oe ee te) ee ee oe alleged in the Complaint ? a. Answer:- Has the plaintiff heen a resident of the motes soo se sass Sins ome ep State of North Carolina five years previous to the bringing of this action? Answer :‘:- gat Did the defendant willfully and withont binds thes aan cause abandon the plaintiff and live separate and apart from him as alleged in the Complaint ? Answer:- 7 ot stpue) (uozzoT) uTAZOT North Carolina Superior Court Iredell Comty January Term, 1905. Re Ve DOttan + vs JUDGYENT. Candis Loftin This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before His Honor Henry R. Brgan, Judge, and a Jury and being heard upon the entire record and the Jury having found the dasue:No. -~l-~- Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Yes. Secong@. Has the plaintiff heen a resident of the state of North Carolina five years previous to the bringing of this action, and did the defendant wilfully and without cause abandon the plaintiff , and live . separate and eapert from hin as alleged in the Complaint ? Yes." Tt is therefore considered and adjudged hy the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the @efendant. be dissolved and that the plaintiff he freed and dischearced from any and all liability and responsibility to and for the defendant on account of the relationship heretorore existing netween theme "SA OTR] UOAT Nerth Carelipa, 4 Iredell Ceunty. § a Mamie Lyen =“ ‘Vs, APPLICA ivi Ao ous AS A PAUPEK O.B.Lyen TO Tet CLExK OF “Hs SUPEKLOR COURT Ur LiKUDELL COUNTY: This is te certify thet we have examined the case ef the plaintiff, in the abeve entitled action, and believe that . she has a ceed and meriterieus cause ef actien in law ane fact, she This the 10th, day ef August,1918, x ee . At terneys Nerth Carelina, lredell Ceunty. Mamie Lyen, being duly swern, says:That she is unable te give securithes, or make the depesit required by law, te enable her te preseeute the abeve entitled actien against the abeve named defendant, and therefere, prays that she be allewed te sue in said@ aetien as a pauper, Swern te and subscribed befere me, ] ‘ this the 10th, day ef August,1918, s C.S.C, Nerth Carelina, lredell Ceunty, Mamie “yen 4 Vs. ¢ ORDEX GHANI1..G LEAVE TO SUE AS A PAUPER. O.s.Lyen 4 IN the ahbeve entiled actien, upen the certificate and affidavid set forth, it is erdered: lst.That the abeve named plaintiff, Mamic lyen,be and she is hereby allewed te sue_as a pauper, 2nd, That lewis & Lewis be asigned te her as ceunsel te presecute said actien, ' This August 10th, ,1918, A. Mirborrs Clegk Superier Ceurt ef Iredell Ceunty. ‘SA OTUIRYY “UOA'T Uvuney Oo . 8 sm aeiae Caurt SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina. To the Sheriff of Iredell the defendant_- above named, if. R¢--be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of- iIredeliL at the Court House in ist Monday of the same being the. +4 th day of 191.8._, and answer the complaint, a copy of whieli will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if he__ BiexX fail @o answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. = Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return./ Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this___) Otigay of Clerk of Superior Court lredell uefy otuew OHNTIGBI ‘S}qap SI eAoqe puB J0A0 jsusmby alojoq peqiiosqnus pue 0} WI0OMgG SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Returnable to Octeber Term, 191_8__ "Jo ABpr- ooo" styg ‘spRes puY spuvYy ano sseuTQT Ay ~-"=""JO WINS ot} UT “MOTOR S14} Ul ~-~-jUBpUEzeq 94) | WNIIONVO HLMON 40 ALVLS ( *Agunog--------tTepeat-------- ‘sUOI}NOexe WOIy Jdulexe Ayledoid pur s “UOT}Ow SI} UI ~~--"“yryuTe,g ey} JO A9A0001 Avur ~---+-;uupasyoq 94} 8B 4S00 "p4n0Q sorsadng oy) Uz casi ieet — ee anne a espa 3 = ® > a =. . y . i ; i ‘ t : i i . t g i 3 Qs i = "A 3 : e S . - i ' i ! ' ' i i ' i i i ! i ' ! ! ! i i ! i i ' ; _ SS — ' ' T 1G i TAs ie “Hen eenaecencececeanseacencconccae-peeg en----""0jun punog seajosino oSpejmouyoe 9) yons [[@ ~~~~~~juaBpuejogd sy} ed en eee ene re oq} jt ‘T9AVMOY SIv[[Op peapuny OM} JO WINS oY} YOM st oy SABS UIOMS Buleq ~-~~-- “PIOA oq 0} ‘SIB]]Oq-~-~ Plaintiff’s Attorney. Lyon, Mamie vs. Lyon, O. B. 1918 ‘SA STUUR “UOAT North Carolina | In the Superior Court | Iredell County | Before the Clerk | Mamie Lyon {f VS. { AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF TO OBTAIN SERVICE OF SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. OB. Lyon Om fo the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County: Mamie Lyon, the plaintiff in the above entitled ac- tion, maketh oath that the defendant, 0.B. Lyon, cannot after due diligence be found in the State of North Caro- lina; that said plaintiff has a good cause of action ageinst defendant, to-wit: a cause of action for divorce absolute on the grounds that said defendant has committed adultry with one Pearl Smith, being the husband of said plaintiff, which act is made a cause for divorce absolute by the laws of the State of North Carolina; that said de- fendant formerly ofS mas departed from the State, and that personal service of summons cannot be had in this action, wherein Mamie lyon, the plaintiff, seeks & divorce absolute from said defendant; that a summons was duly issued on the 10th day of August, 1918, by the Clerk ’ of the Superior Court of Iredell County and returned by Sheriff of Iredell County endorsed “defendant cannot be in the State of North Carolina or Iredell County after due diligence to Locate him". mi. 4 +}, '}+}), This the 10th Sworn to and subscribed to the 10th Nati Glerk superior Court. "SA OTUIRIA] “UOAT North Carelina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. 4 | Before the Clerk, Mamie Lyen Ve. 4 ORDER OF PUBLICATION. 0.B, Lyon “his cause coming en to be heard and being heard, and it appearing to the Court frem the affidavit of Manie Lyon,the plaintiff in the above entitled action, that the defendant cannot,after due dilligence to lecate him, be found in the State of North Carolina,and that the plaintiff has a good cause ef action against the defendant, M@ and it futher appearing to hhe Court that the defendant has departed from the State and that his whereabouts is now unknown to the plaintiff: It is,therefore, ordered by the Court that notice of this actien be advertised in the Sentinel, A newe paper published in Iredell County, State of North Carolina,for four successive weeks, setting forth the title of the actien,with a brief and plain statement of the cause and subject matter of the action, and requiring the defendant to appear at the Next Term of the Supgerier Court of Iredell Ceunty, to be HAMAX held on the 6th, Menday after the lst. Monday of Sephenber,, the same being the 14th. day ef October,1918, and anawer or derur to the compalint ef the plaintiff. This the loth, day of August,1918, "SA OTUIRY SUOAT Netice ef servise ef Summens by Publicatien a Nerth Carelina, ¢ In the Superier Geurt Iredell Veunty. § Mamie Llyen { Vs. @ NOTICE 0. B, Lyon ¢ O.B.Lyen, the defendant abeve named, will take netice that an actien entitled as abeve has been commenced in the Superier Ceurt ef iredell Yeunty, State ef Nerth Carelina,wherein the plaintiff, Mamie Lyen, BKMMX seeks a divoree abeelute frem the pends ef matrimeny With the defendant, 0,B.lyen, en the greunds ef adultry en the part ef the said defendant;and the said defendant will futher take netice that he is required te appear at the Osteber Term,ig1a; ef the Superier Ceurt ef Iredell Ceunty, Nerth Carelina, te be held en the 6th, Menday after the lat, Menday ef September, the same being the 14th, day ef Oeteber, 1918, at the Ceurt Heuse ef said County in Statesville, Nerth Carelina, and answer er demur te the cemplaint in said actien, er the plaintiff will apply te the Ceurt fer the relief demanded in said cemplaint, This 12th, day ef “ugust,1918 rk (ef/the Superier Ceurt ef lredell Ceunty. *% . ¢ P S B. o a North Carolina { In the Superior Court | Iredell County | October Term, 1918 ] Mamie Lyon {f VS. j COMPLAI EF ®. Se aR pS PN Le reneptinn icone: ain Ra INNS rene tis I Sac GARR is The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant for cause of action,alleges and says: ei RS 8: om That on or about the 25th dey of Decembgr, 1903, in Iredell County, State of North Carolina, the Plaintiff and defendant intermarried and lived together as man anu wife until on or about the 23rd day of August, 1913, and they &re now man and wife. SECOND: That about six years after the marriage of the plain- tiff and defendant, the said defendant, without any cause or reason whatsoever, and without any fault on the part of the plaintiff, began to neglect and abuse the plaintir? by use of insulting language to her, until on or about the eord day of August, 1913, totally disregarding her feelings he abandoned her; that soon after he abandoned her he wil- fully and without any cause, only to Shamefully abuse and mistreat the plaintiff, take up with and committed adultry Goth 6th Pirwid untrrw- ta Pp: with one Pearl Smith, which relation continued for D: that plaintiff has not received the defendant, con jugal embraces since her knowledge of his conduct and since he + + abandoned her as set out above. UU eh Be 2S been @ boni fide resident or’ State of North Carolina for more an two years next pre- 2 [Vy 58 2OMmma _aAman + a teal thi Ceains © COmmencement oz 0D ‘SA OTR “UOAT eT a es That the facts set forth and contained herein have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action. WHEREFORE the plaints tt. Jenene judgment that she be granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of he eed ony with the defendant. Mamie Lyon, being duly sworn, deposes and says, that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of her knowledge and belief, and that said com- pléint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and the defendant, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in said complaint as grounds for have existed to affiants knowledge for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action or the filing of Carolina for more than this action or the complaint. ~wWOrn F na sudsc aintiff. B 3 Lewis & Attorneys for P} Lyon, Mamie vs. Lyon, O. B. 1918 Lyon : Lyon, » will tak to appear at ber Term, 1918, of the Super." ior Court. of Tredell County,North Ca- rolina, to be held on the 6th Monday after the 1st Monday of September, the same being the 14th day of Oc- tober, 1918, at the €ourt House “Will apply to aie demanded in said comp This. 12th day of August, 1918, . A. HARTNESS % Clerk of the Superior Court We oar Iredel County. = Lewis & Lewis; 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff. 4t9-2 ‘gd ‘CO UOKT ‘SA OTR] “UOAT 8l6l i* ] i : | e Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ee catia alae a ? - B. rounds of adultery on said defendant; and fi ~ a acai museneemesennes.. ded in | This. 12th day of August, 1918. a, A HARTNESS Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel-County. Lewis & Lewis; Attorneys for Plaintiff. 4t9-2 ‘SA oTURYy ‘UOAT Repeated Intentionally Y of August, 1918, J, Ay HARTNESS Clurk of the Superior Court of Iredel County. Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys for Plaintiff. ‘SA OTR “UOAT 4t9-2 ay : me Mio | a YGF lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally tob said County j rolina, B Hae cs HARTNESS Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredel- County. Lewis & Lewis; Attorneys for Plaintift. 4t9-2 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally < ° Pp <= rX} 3. o < ¥ ID IREORLL COUNTY | SENTINEL CO., INC. MONDAY AND THURSDAY ESTABLISHED 1692 INCORPORATED 1917 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL. STATESVILLE, N. C., May 29-19 i Cowty;- ; ing duly Sworn, Say8:=- That ke is and was Avust 1918 tue editor of The Statesville Uublished in Iredell co unty that the attached entitled, Mamie Lyor agai nat OB Lyons sVeuthd ewepaper on the twelfth day of Augwt 1918 Fe weeks thereaftere Signe ‘oS Oe oe Ue Ge Ee Oe me oe Ww before me -1919 North Carolina, | Iredell County. | Mamie lyon | Vs. J IssusBs, 0.B.Lyon Lst. 91d the Plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? 2nd. Did the defendant commit edultry as alleged in the complaint? "0 ‘UOK] ‘SA OTUeYAy UOAT fh 816l 5rd, Has the plaintiff been a resident of North Carolina for more than two years tre on ts oa ita cece aasen t "” ach. 7 & ° P <= 8. @ < ¥ 7 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell County, | May Term, 1919, Mamie Lyon Vs. TUDGMEN?, 0.B. Lyon This cause coming on to be heard ahd: béing: heara ate this Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, before his Honor, W.F,Harding, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the jury having answereé the issues submitted to them as "lst, follows: Did the plaintire and defendant intermarry complaint? a8 alleged in the Answer Yes 2nd. Did the defendant commit adultry as a1iéged in the Complaint? Answer Yes Srd. Has the plaintirr been anbont fide resident of Worth Carolina for more‘ than two years prior to the commenement of this action? Answer Yes" It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby desolved, and the Plaintiff is Granted an absolute divoree from the defendant? and it ts futher ordered that the plaintirr pay the costs of this action, — Bill of Catton Aun Printed and for sale i by. Brady Printing Co., Sean: N.C Original Summons, or other names therein No. Docket I" | Every copy of same B one IN THE SUPERIOR COURT.|3. a0) AKA “| Appeal from Clerk to Judge. -50}}---- County. Onder for enlarging time of pleading 25 }}--- Interlocutory Orders. ee Sie og re Attachment, Order ih 50 Injunction Order, including Bond and Justification. . . . Order of Arrest Subpoena, each name Notifying Solicitor of Renioval of Guardian Continuance Caveat to a'will, entering and docketing Issuing Commission Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate .4 7Y py Seat... 4s Notice, for each name over one in same paper Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time.. Judgment final before Clerk... . "SA OTUIRIA] “UOAT Judgment in favor of Widow's Year's Support Docketing game DockgtjAg ex parte Proceedengs Judgement Indexing Judgment.. Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgement. Exscution of Sherriff's Return . . Appeal! to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal . . Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when jury impaneled . . Referee’s Allowance . Sheriff se “e Constable. Magistrate... . Plaintiff's Witnesses CIVIL DOCKET. 4 BILL OF COSTS~CIVIL. t a (As Fixed by the Code.) = > Lyon, Mamie vs. Lyon, O. B. 1918 =. ta -& Co vec 5 og s. ob oe & Maes 2 410 Line Mine: ane a on Pa a ee ito eth hae tee frvet ae tow 8 2 hlacsG co ae Cate better? termes dig 45 Cn fillet W Hfe ok *ha~~ Mba Aire ae Jie « Asgine 20 : Bat: faces Lees. mee denny Arnett Fhe CCele.t e~4 Lote eng eb Canna ol Hee, ein ed fee, Casee Gece’ F-~22 ti OF tds ee pi Alea Haft 20> C2-4iae ea 9 a oF pe eye A 4 Cri ibis ZO @? phget pens Fp rigs Me FS Olr~ Alaceb _ of preterm, BY 020 ott J } yd / AA ° a MtA ere eee Cree filo eile X Alte te we atl she Geel 0 Refine ant bart 6m p22 at nies ie all Aer 2 gl © he oe dal Af FY 2 “SA *yY yeaezrey ‘uosy] "Oo °F *u0sy $-| MW#Hal Hef, act ¢ Pee ee ~ a , a4 ovr Pave Cities + an ‘ 4 eet, J 1 Sat eee Cl frPerG Cre 23 Ayes ~ Cie . a, ae Pei eg: lee. it C2zeel Ahal CLLL0 os ; ? ns : ‘? s > i 2 2? . PP % 4 te A e--7 fn Pras e CchLag itie-elene oe PP, 1 —_—_——-. - * eee. 6 yo wll filo kgg @2r+ereof ken otis uae ee A — Zz > na Ace Qeaee 42 Chee AZ Boal Late, tlle @2.28 ‘de: a ilins ot i snl at L» ste Cs CE Gfooc lame G a Bn nly, C-Btinces Me gt a 2 e-2« Bt is a > Cree A ag ans ill tied to Mey GOrime. Ma oe cs Onn flr abv, y a Brveye Dttae Bawl Cae fev ct hecaae ee out A cee lite ale ey 2 eae Piradhitien iin at. Glow tena Wels ..0€ ha ~~ Le Jibré=« ‘ys pr de Aa ffO> 7 phere Ge Preigl ficaea LE bD >, cia’ a. benny Arncatd the CC ele. C4 ten Ye es etet Bn sot Ale At-Baeeter 5 oO Le-7 fo fh Case ante Oke, ey a aia: ciate, Ave a ME er peret Ae See Cnet he | Bz Bt Pee ey Zo: Cf Ce welt F as FOr ant / 2 [fo | a~ ft if iis if C. ee, CF piiias a tlhe. ~ Zé Got “CPi aa az oF Cecol ff amd Zt ee ee Ff | er ts i as “at fie C2 Cann eee scene ee 3 Ay hem... Mts aes. hahha s “yo ea | ade BGersl Ae s+ ee Preece Ae tin ini ge & ss AP ter Mh ae oJ 1 x ae ae Mifinn Cant has Ms a eel #6. i Cane Cigff 05. ten A 2 Att Ch tease ft» a. £7 Biota ae: Coren allt —., ba ie Cpa Pte ithe. gies ELS heied ae , he i 7 oa Soir eee OO-d. Coo -o 00 Coin ne, ——S a ya tll Aca baneeet tl Clee tiefoue Nest ZA Pea aes cat Chet fe Genel Bz 2 > Cre aed ‘ey 222, 2ae+e Se tte, JZ —_ ; | Cure Zee Maeno phe nn tty a foe \Ze2bl2s42 ~, oboe a A207 Jian Aor... slain tails: | ¢ | a ants 4 i fhast RAEN ieee Ae Bren Sir Axe Of Com tar ety - oF ee tt ee eee xe Of Cnn Op « ConLegee pevteOgl mmc oe, Mo fecesl 25.2<Ce€ Loestmet Sa Ce-<— 0.6) Me fee Gee i Me ian a pe ae ining ial. sa in La | reel fovee Hl yoy cake PASE ao st 4 pe 9S, | : — oa haw Ave On py fr? e-< 2 Ay tes Chae fo Cl.) tik dies tr paw nt 4 | eo a AL ee | @a2see ZAaowrre aL Bevtco ne Ze ae [2st 7 ye ht r, fh Ls ban C | Lae shoot ike 2- Dexa ae 7 as | <Zy Pat n-s<g ae rd | | : : | | ye lla a hi cane BE SGAG Hoy wa | Aon> BE? AG Powe t Rr yom Aled 004 thas | FELGO. Lhe? al 2-29, Zine WX |Anee Gorse Haw Lal Oreceechy Loe.» ALLS pia OO bia. =a ic aceiemerammy aicecad Bibine dovot base | en wan Codd Whe an 80? bvkate | 2 eT Ke C4 fest ienu.. Cotescocsag ng) | Ce pte ey hao 8 AC e700 A ce tue OCee U0 hee Ao dn eb teva he tees ileal J Che Amel Ar? Cal pg nis Ce ai ~~ «2 Ah ney £0 . 4 ae ind lai laa >” ane roe pe pee Bec ad can tiys Ban Heian earn a Pecrece Fan nsn Jeter Lod on% Deeplhil CS os iii Che Phew he 2a Se KC Oia. erat aie as | a 2 ae | a. eae hn Caigh) berries Chee Be ff Aku Amel Pant Cael pore , Qe eo a ee, ae ot bare fire Heo fen Fo Oo <P aa ais ang lie ail —* =e fa B- your ae a Pe a lay > Cov Bi) dees Llc of Cacl yey” Py OF Py ane HE Lote a ae | Arig A Pie Calida: icine Oita, fe Ce 1D aoe 4 oe Let Bia oe ore”: leas ot Aim OP dint nad iin s p2108 cenit anne En ee Fd | fl Fhw Cavys Le Hho C0LL0 ay « Capeve bonne ee ) | aLe Oy Coane) Melk Gp eee fa. - oa ot Saw thee Cla ia bie ie pee ZH AA Ze Cr oi Ee j A i lac Gat Chlabes, 9.0% Ho> Fhe.» Cllls he Cler_ «2. Fa SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 4-21-'07-1M, County.~--9n the Superior Court. Are “op1K7] ‘SA *L “2D ‘OpAT 6061 eae Ze, © Vs SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. messi ag State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of... <4-¢7r t-+€..—.__ County—GREETING: Wou are hereby Commanded to Summon the defendant ...above named, if be found within your nine: to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be a fo Count ...at the Court House in siicnanit A cs Pht the Lo i qieire of “a the same being the... Z 2 OO OF. ht Bilt ree , 190, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office/fof/the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant......take notice if....... they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this...._.«..day off..... tk of Superior Court...’ County. Arey ‘opyAy ‘SA ' - ‘pq 6061 yO 2Qeamay 431139 YOd SNOWMAS Qarerg n pe j * jo Aup SI} Out a10jaq paqiiosqns puv 07 UIOMS ‘SUONNOAXS tO ydittaxa Ayrodold PUY SOHTTIGUE ‘sIqep sty aA0qe puv JaA0 SIPT[OP paipuny om) jo uns ay) YOM 8} Ol BAUS OMS Bujaq (‘|wag) (*1¥9§) (‘1wag) o61 ‘ad “y jo Avp S14) ‘S|vos puv spuvy ino SSOUIIM ‘MOH Ow BIN) UY PNUL | Oy) JO A09a1 Av JUBPNIJ9C] St) SB yS09 yous type Wepusjac, ay) Avd [poqs HHA Oy) Ft “eAsMoy ‘PIOA oq 0} ‘sanTPOd ’ JO WANS OY) UT “uoNoW sry] Of JUBPUdJECT SY} ouun punog SeATASInO a3pay Mou you OM LSNIVOV \ ‘AQuNOD ‘MNO sopedng ey) uy ‘¥NI'IONVD HLNON 4O aLYLs Arey ‘ophy ‘SA 7 —- ‘OpAT 6061 42 72 if eS 9} F[Quunjoy wv Sa ~ JO Jan0D JoLadng 3q3 Jo 431739 Y0d SNOWWAS a Be. o co &. gs) w > or oo ° A o ® * jo Aep ~~ SEQ} 2Ur atojaq pequosqns pue 0} noMG ‘SuOHNIexa mor ydutexa Ajradoid pur St tqer] ‘s}qap sty aAoqe pue zaa0 Ste][OP paipuny OM} Jo uns ay} 430M st ay sXes MOMS Suteq” (1eag): (‘Teag): (19g) OOr Maw "yo Aep S1q} ‘S[eas pue spuvy ino ssanjzt\\ “UO1}OB SIq} UI HHArelg 24} Jo 1aA0001 Ae J” BpUIj9q] 9q} SB 3S09 yons [e juepusjeq] ay} Aed [peqs-----~ are ae 1 wo "BHAT 2} jt ‘WAIMoY ‘ploa aq 0} ‘szeq;oq Tete ct JO WINS 943 UF ‘Mor}DR sty Or ” “JUepusjeq 91} 074N punog sadjesino a3pa;mouyor oy ISNIVOV \ *Ayunog ‘Nod s0uedng 943 uy { “¥NITONVOD HLNON 4O AL¥YLS Are ‘ap47 “SA e = ‘pA 6061 North Carolina, Affidavit. Iredell County. U. T. Lytle VB. Mary Lytle. I ze®. V. Long, being duly sworn, deposes and: Says: That in the above entitled action now Genaing in the Superior Court of Iredell County, the sheriff of said county shall return the summons issued to him in said action, efidorsed "Mary Lytle the defendant named in the within summons is not to be found in Iredell Vounty; due diligence having been made bo find said defendant and said defendant said to be out of the State, and is not to be found within the States" that said defendant is & proper party to said action, that said action is a cause for divorce by the above namea plaintiff, c. T. Lytle agatinst the above named defendant, Mary Lytle; wherefore, the said Plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the court that service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newBpaper published in Iredell vounty, North Carolina. This the Sth day of December, 1908. ~~ eS si fo Pee, a8. Beer hcg AVL... cial befor i. hen, A-26 ty, L9G OF J Attorney. pore Lypeeee Arey ‘api SA “1°93 Oph 6061 North Cardlina, Iredell Vounty. Gg. T. Lytle ' ORDER OF PUBLICATION. VB. Mary Lytle. It appearing in the affidavit of Zeb. V. Long, attorney for plaintiff in the above entitled action that Mary Lytle, the denfendant therein is not to be found in Iredell County, and cannot after due diligence be found in the State, and it further appearing that the said action is a cause seeking a digotce; It is therefore ordered, that notice of this action be published once a week for six weeks in the Mascot a newspaper published Iredell vounty, setting forth the title of the action, purpose of the same, and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of the Superior court of Tredell Vounty, to be held on the 5th Monday before the First Monday of March, the same being the 25th day of January, 1909, at the Court House in said County, and answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff, or the relief therein demanded will be granted. This the 5th day of December, 1908, of a oe SOD Lf, Af, XLLB Z DL CL LacZ North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 1909, Arey ‘pAq ‘SAL *D ‘Oph :@.%, Lytle, ve. 6061 COMPLAINT. Mary Lytle. ‘The’ pleintire above namea complains | of the defednant and alleges: First. Tnat on </ day of December, Ja.shbae tn Cabarrus County, in the State of North Curolina, the plaintiff and defefdant intermarried and ever since have been and now are husband and wife. Second. “hat the plaintiff is and has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for the period of two years immediately preceed- ing the commencement of this action. Third. That on the 16th day of October, 1904, about “years after their marriage, the defendant, Mary Lytle, abandoned the plaintirr and has ever since lived separate and apart from him and that since that date the plaintiff and defendant have not lived together, and have not cohabited as husband and wife, That since the date of the abandonment of the plaintiff by the said defendant, Mary Lytle, she committed adultery with other men, and is now living in adultery with other men, Fourth. That said acXts of adultery were committed without the consent, connivance or procurement of the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff has not lived with or voluntarily cohabited with the defendant since the 16th day of December, 1904, the date off the abandonment of the plaintirr by said defednant, and since the discovery by the plaintirr of the said aces of adultery by the defednant. Fifth. That prior to the abandonment of the Plaintiff by saia defednant as alleged above two children were born to them, one of-which children is dead and the other one, a little girl, is now living and is about the age of seven (7), and is now living with, being provided for ahd cared for by the plaintirr. Arey ‘apyhq ‘SAL “DS ‘OpAT 6061 Wherefore the plaintiff demands judgment that the bonds of | metrimony between himself and defendant be dissolved; and that the little girl child be awarded to him for the purpose of carrying for and raising The plaintirr, C. T. Lytle, being deuly sworn, says: her, and for the cost of this action. That the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to his own knowledge, except as to those alleged upon information and belief, and as to these he believes it to be true; that the said complaint is not for the purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set # forth in the complaint for the grounds of divorce have existed to his knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of the complaint and the plaintiff has been a resident of the State of Nobbh Carolina for two years next preceeding the filing of the complaint. i ial haiti nt . Subscribed and sworn before me, 24th day of December, 1908. Salewile, NG, YM a: ape many Aap. \ », Masrat Vublishing Compe VANCE NORWOOD, LESSEE. The Ebening Mascot The Hcedell County DAILY EXCEPT SUNDAY MONDAYS AND THURSD, ) o ‘ d-tox~G Arey ‘apy SASL DO SPAT 6061 Salevil, NE, YM M. CA apa 6 mang pile Arey ‘ap1h] MLD ae ' dn » Ss , ), Mascot Publishing Compr Che Ebening ooo enreer area County DAILY EXCEPT SUNDAY MONDAYS AND THURSD. 6061 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally 4 Salesvile, NC, AM M. ©. A ohyah i may ye : _ d-tno~G Arey ‘apa ‘SAT “2D ‘opAT |, Mascot Vublishing Compe : QU VANCE NORWOOD, Lessee, The Ebening Mascot The Iredell County 4 DAILY EXCEPT SUNDAY MONDAYS AND THURSD. 6061 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Slewil, NEC. fe ( Sub: 1 Aang >), Mascot Publishing Compe VANCE NORWOOD, LESSEE. The Ebening Mascot The Iredell County MONDAYS AND THURSD. Are “KJ SA “LD Oph 6061 DAILY EXCEPT SUNDAY county to be on the Fifth Mon- day before the First Monday in March, the same the 25th day of January, 1909, at the court house of said county, in Statesville, North Carolina, and answer or demur to the complaint in said action, or the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in said com lain t. This the 5th day of Dec., 1908, J. A. HARTNESS, ©. 8. ©. Zeb V. Long, Atty. 11-7+4t, Me y ee EO" Be pes eS '*§ LBM AOA & a Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Arey ‘aphq ‘SAL “D ‘OPA 6061 ult C. A daa pia chap Salesile, NE, 1 S _¢-to~G q Masrot Wublishing Compa VANCE NORWOOD, LESSEE. The Iredell County 4 < pri = MONDAYS AND THURSD. DAILY EXCEPT SUNDAY Noth Carolina, Tredell County. ‘ior Court of Iredell coun tc obtain a divorce, and the said de- fendant will further take notice that she is required to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of said county to be held on the Fifth Mon- day before the First Monday in March, the same being the 25th day of January, 1909, at the court house of said county, in Statesville, North Carolina, and answer or demur to the complaint in said action, or the | plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in said com lain t. This the 5th day of Dec., 1908. J. A. HARTNESS, C. 8. ©. Zeb V. Long, Atty. 11-74. é ( ty to} @ 4 ( q é é q 4 Dive Tetuwt ot C..: Eph ‘4. roy atts Please Note: Document(s) _ Repeated Intentionally Arey ‘21147 ‘SA Ai ~ ‘opAq 6061 Be a Pa eee Riemann . SANE ot ete TERR ge —— Sealewil, NCE, ffl 1909 dM CoA death aay Lag o , Mascot Publishing Company ay. VANCE NORWOOD, Lessee, The Ebening Mascot The Iredell County Mascot MONDAYS AND THURSDAYS i Hee DAILY EXCEPT SUNDAY I S., disous neti of ©.8: Apt h. ron Aya pi 1K : 6, SA‘T* . is aa Bao ae gat Fb —— Ta Lee foe a die erginnf. Shur eae sce _ jp Lytle, C. T. vs. Lytle, Mary 1909 Arey, ‘2p1h7] SAL OD Sky 6061 Nortn Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredeli County. May Term, 1909. Cc. i. Lytle v8. JUDGMENT. Mary Lytle. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the Court before his Honor, E. B. Jones, Judge, and a jury, and the jury having answered ali the issues as set out in the records in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant: It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defeddant be dissolved and the plaintiff freed and discharged.from any and all liability because of the marriage aforesaid: It is further decreed, ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the plaintiff, C. T. Lytle, shall nave the care, control and custody of the only living issue of said marriage, Flonsa Lytle, and that the deferidant, Mary Lytle,be denied any further interference or right over said Flone Lytle. Lytle, C. T. vs. Lytle, Mary — 1909 Arey ‘247] SA“ “2D Ophq 6061 Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Prirted and for iy Brady, The Cage tere, meres iion IN THE SUPERIOR COURT q County. —————— es ican C.2: 43 Agaikst / . we “Meta, A Cl. 8 Judgment Against Original Summons. oF + oe “icra atte Sale Every copy of same. Bond, including Justification Appeal from Justices....... i Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian... . Continuance Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing. Issuing Commission ........ Notice, for each name over one in same paper.. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk eting ex parte Proceedings SUNMIMAEE nilech lisadid esdcioow sicjacntseridaiadccudsccs Transcript to Supreme Court............ copy sheets, each..... County Tax, when Jury impaneled A Plaintiff's Witnesses CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS—CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) Lytle, C. T. vs. Lytle, Mary 1909 “9 oTSBey ‘AreI99K “SA wy swmous, £58309K ef h Quinn Q Lagpussr Cacch. re leet ong? rd Onn chen CDF £ Hera EP Cong — Se | 7 e Ue fn ff Or Y acre Cree ee OE L-4 60 | a ah a a ” f Mic ges iit fn eae Hafele eae (Pr cc A <a ss leek Fo ee Depo shes <4 -o Gorcee« acces cope sau gee Ca (awe x ae CLL -CxO r fh U Leeer ies GHG: Oz AY ce Finca it isnot olen, Of. JEL Fle lett Bere a OC Abeay 4 oe ea yo (PPE AGL WUUPYo xeece rls < 7 aikes ie He flu Tf he -wea rete pe Fe - a ales By, PE ern ol C-zce SO a annul Phat. ae aad : BL 2a f> eh ie Lore Gh fre he Oce al Bz, got. ©. DP Crecog VE ype ortcC Ce Hole tlerg Lett Guce LE. L272. reg Z Ya 0 sce o ce {7 A fs . ‘ - WA, Wyreese A . ( Da A CATE t Lee 4 Me Va Pot, 6 tha aa 7. A ct? [Pett a Cece feLeve a f f _ ) —_ 2 0 (Covoenar.tleil Beale LvtcK ZZ KA ffl op fo s v YO ot ff Qk Zeuw€x< a e te oct FZ Fe é ‘ae Cel. fect fole At te $0" J 4 A > 4 _ ( 9 Ff A LO LtuUatlCe. fr Alot dads se Mcerrce Lt~-2cf. Y 4 4 a LEPC for ee ig ae x ‘i MN is ie aetna le a AC fore Frevenes Kane gt PED pi a ip ge eas CPrtbewey fares a eeuhca tical > | (oa < eae ae apes eo : Vy ob heel J off--t Lo Meg ceva Fatih Em, Oar Cor fileich 13 nek grade oaX Sf | [Cut > dy Bl letrecee// Mesa. tet ty : laceck: Bodie Heke cs hel sats ; O ii alee fos 7 oe fee ie na : cece. ‘icesiee. el ce He ar fibac eck: Hak Mok he ett fd Monee doc dee Cu fleece K Cem ed Be on Cucet! C£setaal 4 fe Cre Bcc ee at Cez~ekK eu Gee precies _fereer L4- Ze frL. ff at. Cree fe Lovee: = Yiee- Be ee cma roma laa ee Pacnimbmiak tny Me a Pace te fread feecen€e —_ briellter Ceeec thecz i ahfoKk ces << Ca ft CneceK ae ae pelt Go — emi: rrrn Zn Fie Mi ge, Le a Vote. 23% Pek 1h, ge. 8 A Boke s yy ,C— pk Fa At “Ty semoy], “AtetQON Way a iS *SA “J semoyL ‘41819°H _ *9) eTsey ‘AreI0OW a ros OS me earl emirt neonates eo ~crecehentetaheitiet meron tere McCrary, Thomas e vs. McCrary, Maggie C. ef eg te chuc, es 3 Fike i oe Ze - oe ee Acccn aj ea : a la tat cthlecl. ee Aes Arbre Gan Aeeeceeliet — hpcrrevlsoe 18 Aree oT Tys Thomas be vs. McCrary, Maggie C. “7 semoyl ‘A1e199K é ° J. =* & ® | SUMMONS FOR BELIEF.—Judge—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C. _ nua Zr _County—In the Superior Court. SoMa A “STaTueqo SA 9497 ‘SjaruRqoyy AGAINST Sa a 9161 i SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Garolina. + ¢ 4 To the Sheriff of _ Caren ALY L%. ©. ._County—GREETING : YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to summon... A-1.a. 4Ararier YUE Morne l the defendant_. above named, itoks be found within your County, to be gnd appear before the Judge of our Superjor Court; at 4 Court to be held for the County of a) RN i da oi coat at the Court House in Peat Ts 7 Loan. hu A Sa. At. ro cm on theG-=* Monda after the. Z2<<_.Monday of xpelion Re intone . the same. being the Ll.” aay OF ACM cciwicwiniion 191.C__, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant. -__- take notice if. ca¢s¢__they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff____- will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. A Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 77 day ot/.- hi es Wil Leas McDaniels, Zeke vs. McDaniels, Vernice Against ' es Patarlate Term, 191Z.__ of the Superior Court of LAL ene County. Pi 191_G_ te. Aug J Wirnies ZY0.3 ALL Abt as Ox i* a Sa a hl ee Plaintiff's Attotney. SI4} OW at0¥0q paqiiosqns pus 0} mI0Mg ' ' ' i i ' ' a & < ° es) Rr enter tiara shes WI0Ms 3ureq “I8[[0P peapuny om} yo wns oy} YOM st ay TM 11E a SAE 7 oor eter ser amsedm inane jo ABp--------siqy ‘s[ves pue Spuvy ino sseuy 94} JO 19A0001 Lem ~~” “guBpuezeq oy) se woHow Sty} UT ~----~praTeLy fuspuezeqT oy Avd yyeys---------------- PIOA oq 04 ses MN Ati acetate ee TA0MOY ‘ i wEpuEzad oy) UPd yy Ouyoe OM BY Yons ][@ ------ 1 ---- yy u aT oyun punog seajesino eBpoym Jo tins 04) UT ‘TonoER ‘ VYNI'IOMVO HLYON 40 ALVLS ou} Uy ‘JAN0D snsodng SOs A ‘s[aTueqo ‘SA 9497 ‘sjorueqoyy 9161 Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—s5—,04, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF ..SetacnaBee County--GREETING: Dou are Hereby Commanded to Summan ~ personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county at ‘ Clerk Superior Court for... A ‘sjeraeqoyy ‘SA OY¥9Z ‘sjatueqoyjy odIuI9 9161 * ™ SOUS A ‘sjorueqoyy "SA 9497 ‘sjorueqoyy 9161 North Carolina, Treiell County. Zeke NeDaniels, ) : aia vs COM? DA IN TT. ’ Vernice Weduhensa: Setbukewi A j rr} North Carolina; man and wife. That or re he Plaintiff, comnlainires of the Deferdant That this plaintiff and defeniant were i the #&th jay of larch, 1902, in the County of Tred*lh,..State of xr about the day of Ader f : 914, the lefendant commit In the Superior Court, January Term, 1917, » 2llerves and save: ntermarried om or and that for some time therafter, lived torether as econd. ee ted adultery with Henry St. John. mmission-of adultery, thas \doned . , ? A Pus p- ; ork cco ct ha wert fimcrnltnlfiarnctlis acy he del ce ca cnt ate QIWISA ‘S[oTURG I] "SA OYOZ ‘s[stueqoyy 9161 Nerth Carolina, Tredell County. Zeke NoDaniels, being july sworn, doth say that he has red the foregoing comphdint, 2nd that the facts set forth therein are true to rest of his knowledge and belief: that said complaint is not made 2 eut of levity..er. by. .cellusiorn, between himself. and..the. defemdam tiered onal for the purpose of beins freed ani sevarated from each other, cvut in 4 sincerity and truth and for the causes mentioned in the complaint: that 4 the facts set forth therein as grovrds for divorce have existed to his £ kyowledge atrleast six months prior to the filirg of this complaint; and that he has been a resident of the State: of North Carolina, living in Tredell County of said state, for two years next preceeding the filing of this conpalint. This the 14th day of December, 1918. gg, fi — >. Sworn and subscrited to before me this the 14th day of Decmebr, 1914. bY Jur ht Clerk Superior Court. >) A ‘sjerueqoy ‘SA 9497 ‘sjoruRqoy] 9oIuts \©o nN Sandy SOIWIS A ‘sjoTueqoyj ‘SA SY9Z ‘S[sIURqoy 9161 North Carolina, . " In the Superior Court, Iredell County. January Term, 19168. zeke McDaniels, ) Plaintiff, ) vs AFFIDAVIT. Vernice McDaniels. ) Defendant. ) D. F. Mayberry, being sworn, doth say that Vernice McDaniels ig a proper party in the abov entitled action, and that a cause of action exists against her; that he is informed and telieves that after exercising due diligence the said Vernice '"cDariels cannot be found within the state; that a summons issued from the Superior Court of Tredell County to the Sheriff of Catawba County, said Catawba County being her last known residence, for said Vernice McDaniels, has been returned with the following entry made on same, to wit: " After due search Yernice McDani&als not to be found in Catawba County". Vherefore he asks that summons te served on her, the said Verrice McDaniels, by publication. This the 9th day o®” November, 1°18. 7 / ~ a y LF. Wa ptrrry TF. as sworn and subscribed to before me this the 9t} lay of November,’ 1914. Zs UO BB. omc BP <iN eS 3 6 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, oO < ; aQa'n Tredell County. January Term, 1916. 9161 Zeke NcDaniels, Plaintiff, va ) ) ) ORDER. Vernice MoDaniels, ) Defendant. ) This cause coming on to be heard before J. A. Hirtness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and teing heard upon the affidavit filed in the above entitled action, and it avpearinr to the satisfaction of the court that # cause of action exists arainst Vernice VeDaniels, the above defendant, and that the said Vernice McDaniels, after due diligence cannot be found in the state; It is therefore ordered and adjudged that summoner be served on her,the said Vernice McDanhiels, by publishing a notice of the above ac*ion in The Landmark, a. newsnvapver published ir Iredell County, once a week for four successive weeks: said notice to contain 12 statement of the purpose of said action. This the 9th day of Noverbter, 191°. Superior Court. Sold ‘sjoTueqoW ‘SA 9¥9Z *sjorueqoy 9161 forth Carolina, Tredell County. R. Re Clark, being sworn, doth proprietor of " The Landmark ", a newsraper published and that the foregoinr annexed notice was rutlished im ¢ Vv Landmark ", once a week for four consecuti be Lutte.» 1 ending Mecewebr the 29th day of December’, Sworn and subscribed ee ee Clerk Superg » SOMWI3a A, ‘sporueqoy SA S497 ‘sjorueqoyy North Carolina, Tredell County. 9161 R. R. Clark, being sworn, doth Say that he is the editor and proprietor of " The Landmark ", @ newsnaper published in Iredell Court y; and that the foregoing annexed notice was ~ublished in the said, " The Lanirark ", once a week for four consecutie weeks, berinning Marerenbir Lud» 21 onding Necerke. 15% Th, 14/( This the 29th day of December, 1914, Bd Sworn and subscribed to before me this the 29th of December, 1916. SA A te A. i tn cs Clerk Superior Court. a G eee a ee os gy Ped ed LE lee EE ey CDhplacet tat gg 4 gh, : Zk AI Leet i aa es ii Des. vf ATDS IS) Zhe) Mt fa Bibi. Se SS bio Mf eae ae meth 2. Cha, Fae. C14 » Coes <2 eae Bioapae ie Z fa Y : Ey Alta Riles AL AOmee Par. Bb Fe aS Me ae Nee. x Z Hee Llare we a Mr a oe ae ; Z A i 4 . : Z . ; : : j : — ; Lis Fel - : ; fae 4 i P = il Lt2>? (Gf cont 2 teahgf fj VS ae : Pures, Ze GEL, fo 4 . fae flat 1 hha LSU het Lee ae ge 8 o ( tf ee, sabia . han, Feellee ey | SUMMONS FO RELIEF—CIVIL CASES—OClerk—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C, County—In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To the Sheriff of __ Rowan County—GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to summon .-----~--- Zs — SS oO ae tm S: . & < a CC6I _-be found within your County, to appear at the office of the Clerk of the Su- on the...) §--day of _- WK April. pe 1982... and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said the defendant____above named, if- _he__- perior Court for the County of -.._ILredell County, on or before the return date of this summons, and let - take notice that if...he fail to answer to the said complaint within twenty days from said return date, the plaintiff.... will apply for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this sammons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this._.29_- day of AMAA AaALs i Clerk Superior cour AM coun y. ayy Mre.._Nelia MeIntyre AGAINST “--—“queBpusyzac] “S}qep SITY vAOGe pue JaAO ~~ ="“,UBPUVjaqy ay} SB ysoo SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Returnable within days into the LSNIVOV “SIy} ‘S[Bes PUB SpUBY ANO sseUzT AA office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Sslipiietieeligiess sclilad County. ——— Received _ fet te ee eg 1922-__ Po neo eo eLs Car at ee eeeoe ~~"“STQ} ott a10joq Ppeqtiosqnus pue 0} WI0OMg ~-oyon punog seAjes7no apa, mouyoR aM ay} JO raaoder Avut “JO Tins oY} UT ‘MOTOR stqy ur ‘YNITOUVD HLYON SO ALVLS yo Avp * ( a. eee ee ( “poured =: > = S =. = - > w = 5 5 = — 5 a S = a = e << ® x = > io a v = = =. = = ey SAWS UIOMS SUTAq “Foor sty} ut ti ttt Certs ween neh Zs pagsows ‘JanoyQ 4o1zadng ay} uj Sheriff _._ (Ace a County. -DeL.Raymer, Statesville, N.c. Plaintiff’s Attorney. — ~-yuupaezoqy ey) Avd [eys--------~-------- Siv]jop peipuny OM} JO uns oy} YOM SI oq 9} ‘IBog ““""--" ("‘[8eg ) ~~~ a yous je ~~~" Ptoa McIntire, Nelia vs. McIntire, L. E. 1922 4 oo) — aS 83 a ao i = . 2 < “” C761 North Carolina. In the Superior Court. Iredell County. Nelia MeIntire vs. COMPLAINT. L.E.MeIntire ee I el Ne The plaintiff eomplaining of the defendant for cause of action,alleges and says: FIRST. That she and the defendant were married in Iredell County ,North Carolina,on the 22nd day of May 1918,and since that time have been and are now husband and wife. SECOND. That the plaintiff is now and has been for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action,a resident of the County of Iredell and State of North Carolina. THIR®. That on or about Sept.9th,1919,and at diverous times before and since said date the defendant has cursed and abused the plaintiff and otherwise offered sueh indignities to her as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome. Wherefore the plaintiff prays the court that she may be granted a divorse a mensa tho the defendant. t Attorney for the plaintiff. x= — aE # 6 eae oO nS 14 & < " C761 North Carolina, Iredell County. Nelia MeIntire,being duly sworn depoges and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true of her own knowledge except those matters and things therein stated upon infor- mation and belief and as to those matters and things she believes it to be true; that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself an the defendant and not for the pur pose of being freed and separated from each other,but in sincerity and in truth for the causes naripa tn the complaint; that the facts set forth in this complaint as eddnde for divorce have existed to her knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this com- plaint and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the state of North Carolina for more than two years next preceeding the commencement | of this action. Subscribed and sworn en me | Mes (70d this the th dey 0 . je i hats, i oad a * LG / MclIntire, Nelia vs. McIntire, L. E. 1922 = o a eg Sd om Se C761 hai ts Avert wg a ee — A Fw “r Tan. - a warh—w Co. es aa fet a, Wena a d ee ie—iaiae Gash -* 4, ee Yartoe i fier) BOLD. hp pte: Lehi ot Soa ya. @7 AR t : ; : = QO 2 —_— BS a3 oT 2 m &: mi < a CCOI North Carolina, | In the Superior Court. Iredell County. | May term, 1922. Nelia McIntire jf ISSUES vs. { Le Be McIntire { Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? SEE OM sion lhe gta Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Car- Olina for more than two years prior to the commencement of this actio ? Answer: eeeee es Ses ares a Did the defendent curse and abuse the plaintiff and offer such indignities to her as to render her condition intolerable and life burd- ensome as alleged in the complaint? Answers , Ye i er ea jy. / North Garolina, In the Superior Gourt, Iredell County. May term, 1922. Nelia McIntire VS. JUDGMENT L. B. McIntire This cause coming on to be heard at this term of Gourt before His Honor J. Bis Ray, Judge presiding and a jury and the jury having answered the issues as follows, towit;: Did the plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: ..+-++-Yes Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years prior to the commencement of this action? s 8 a eae, tm S: . & < a Answer: ecccere YOS Did the defendent curse and abuse the plaintiff and offer such CCOI indignities to her as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome as alleged in the complaint? ANSWEr: ceecceee YOS It is therefore considered and adjudged that the plaintiff be and she is hereby granted a divorce from bed and board from the defend- ant. Bill of Coste—Civil,—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Bond, uding Justification... ... .f. Appeal from Clerk to Judge. . . . Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . Order of Arrest Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. . .... . Continuance Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing Issuing Commission Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk =< — a5 sa See me - 2 < a Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . ... . . Docketing same eting ex parle Proceedings 5 Judgment Indexing Judgment CC6I Filing Papers Postage, actua! Transcript of Judgment Sheriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00]] __ Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each.. 10 County Tax, when Jury impaneled Referee's Allowance ...... “ Defendant's Witnesses. “ “ I genoa CIVIL DOCKET. ~ BILL OF GOSTS--GIVIL, (As Fixed by the Code.) McIntire, Nelia vs. McIntire, L. E. 1922 a 8 $3 — Oo ES 3 oO < “ 6061 \ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 4-21-'07-1M, Ard k_ 2. Pelh—~ DR SS tie SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. County.--In the. Superior Court. ra * soow State oF N rth Carolina: the defendant...above naméd, if “Te be found within your County, to be and Pent before the Judge of rior Court, at a Court to be he r the Count ; at the Court House in : 3 ilies ‘ the =>..... Monday he me Monday of the same being the..2-.9 Sy of ad 190, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant... take notice if./ il to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiffs will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this aS ™day of Pa. ieee ALM bshitidy, Md Alar of Superior Court. Wd ZZ. Ke La County. Jf A 7\} 219eUIN}ayy 431739 YO SNOWAARS /~J0 j4NoD 1o0113dng 913 jo ro ATTEN “saya ‘SA X9TY “Soyo oc. 5] wa > - co ° A 3 oe e 6061 jo Aep SI} SUI a1Ojaq paqiiosqns pur 0} TIOMG ‘SUOT}NSaxX9 wWOIy ydutaxa Ay10d01d paue saijtiiqery ‘syqap sty aaoqe pue I3A0 SIe][Op peipuny OA} jo uns 94} YOM st oy ses mIOMSs Sutaq ("1Bag)° (‘Teag) (‘{eag) o61 ‘q'y jo Aep S1q} ‘s[eas pue Spuey INO ssanqyiM “DOTjOB STq} ur Huaeg ey) jo IOAODII Avw JUBpUIjoIq oy} SB SOD yons |e yaepusjaq oy} Aed jyeys HHL 9y} Ft ‘TaAamoy ‘PIOA 2q 0} ‘sie[[oq vr ee JO UNS 9} Ot ‘aorjDe sty} Ut JUBPUIJeq] 917} oyun punog SeA[ISINO a3pa| Mou yor 7M LSNIVOV ‘Ayanog ‘NOD s0uedng ay} ay { “¥NITOUVO HLYON 4O AL¥LS SIIION “ayo ‘SA XOTV “2049 Oo a) \o North Carolina, * tm the Superior Court = Jredell County. January ierm-1909, Alex McKee 8. Complaint, Nellie McKee. 8 The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges and says: 1. That in the year 1891,the plaintiff intermarried with tue defendant Nellie McKee according to law,and tnence forward fem-e— from that time until now tne marriage relation has existed between tne said parties. ©, That seven years ago the said Nellie McKee deserted the said Alex McKee and went back to her mother and has from that time lived separate and apart from her said husband and the said Nellie McKee has committed adultry with one Watson Kilpatrick . %.That the said Alex Jchee .me 1.01 lived with tne said ne’7"46 NeKee ror cohebited with her nor condoned the offense in any way since the act was committed. Wherefore the plaintiff makes application to the court for an order granting an absolute divorce from the said Nellie McKee and disolving the bonds of matrimony for the cause above set out and that the cost of this action be taxed by Ra ha of this court, v Attorney for Plaiftiff. Alex McKee being duly sworn deposes and says,that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true, kaxtkexkesk except a6 to those things therein stated on informationgand belief and as to those things he believes it to be true-- that he has filed the said complaint not out of levity or collusion between the said wife and husband-- and not for the mere purpose of waikng freeing and separating the said husband and wife,but in sincerity and truth for the matters and causes mentioned in the complaint- that the said facts have existed to the knowledge of the affiant for at least six months prior to the commencement of this action and that the said Alex McKee has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceding the filing of this complaint. Moe MCL Le Sworn to and subscribed before me ay of ee, 1909. Aas Lig ——— i aad Public/ seTrey pueTTeTOR nt LOAN ONS EES, f i ee 7 Safer Aa Srvoleee ~e oe og Uo yee Mirr71ri« Nh ile Mika nw q Yt Lyn ALL f : , Ohl k. Wi Sf / ¥, Mai hLK iene. aie ok (2 tghi | hl ih 2+. defend an bhi BO he ie pe TPs eared tage aes oe bit tt 4 VET Arnel Crime cl a0 Leitarsl anttop, ttt Q (Fre Pai os Let his yiree LG-F Ae, wher. Difaic Paice Lt piace hg. J i ¥¢ fy ye: tedick «: ag « acest Ji.2+ age cp OMe ohne IZ ow i Pits Aettbing “t 2S & besa er yun Qnctae of oF os Slate AZZ. 4 er aad fee at lti/~,-« + aie or i vet l nee 744 Th. Pda 44d, Cis oe a ae el Pion: 4 A Snttirs 903th roe Mi tr rm lirchrOan VY Gara ages ye i~ Pee ee Cees. Cr ore D or 22 { b, Cl oto es Lif. J /VWheregrrs fila /4 Peernalh Lede Tis Whe: bre of fe ei rc fir ob theins - Lv cee ds La Fuss a a Awd bg 14% S ey e / Radia: ® / ; At zed >o ct cre hn SeTseYD PUeTTeTON *SA big eae wi ror | > mr ee @ o74 bao Lacue 2, Se ota 45 re # tH. fe te ILIV Ses tis ak. PA oe te Hate. a Of OQ 4+ Ge P24. Oot a ye eee oe ae Rl cL, an ve Lad reed. v6, Hise hace DA Hopp i % dre asiig ate Rds ons . ack firth 2+ The oe Ooisr liad pe Frick ? ow phone ote (error 4 Qy Ly ecZL, Sc. Ld Winn aa Bam Sony Siu teonhncL,» Pon Ca SAS ? Wéming co D> fm aah (, pina Lp J . oe, tow beg j ee oo J fe , f Au of | A t-> hig, Un atin Ne Kel face ( 2 d2¢« (5 oe i eae peice JX ae hea Bie vt - oe Jiro» pe C4 Aud s 2 bie / f9 i —/ : J Oh 4 er oe te srty LinSflart 1 J a i Ave vt S$, eT <p be othe ef kh be iD free SeTsey) PUeTTeIOW a aifas ott frit ne Pee eek a t Gere and Tintl por The Cawrce porte. Peis is Tee ee ae gromh er Diver ee Khe dak, ach prik jm The CinMar 7, ae fem fo Sire ee, have pene TT Jeb ee aes Ge ea. Phan ty rch. pore Gtk, fih, el Ke Cr [Lav t! ok berm Lairran tie bec 4 ees gthe. Mts pe i oe es Tees pre k pr cesdine S VY op 9+ % yl bag oe Ar ie fo ) 4 og mi Og oe ng, ew AI Af _-~ YF, P 4/ rg cn f Ex 7 CLA Le ‘ Tigsvcc Di Reieiay Vs : th Pte Wi KM z i ne CnnhlaLt ETL, L SE gy AIT MD 4 ZAA ACA CH L vs * McLelland Charles 8. ihaiiisie Nis ond nd: _ appear, ft _ It rn eae rs that Charles McLelland, defe: is @ non-resi- = and cannot after due diligence mand l appear from returns of the “anor an | that he isa proper and Taltnnd fo eck snk said ee —- s hreby not appear at the February term, ° Tredeil Superior Court, and answer or demur to | the complaint, a copy of which will be filed in. the office of the court on or before the 3d day | of said term, beginning on the fourth Monday || before the first Monday in March, 1895, or the relief Reread } rwill be granted. Nov. 30, J. H. HILL, 0. 8. C, i sswrvonrres| «> THE, LANDMARK. ™ [sree ee et F ish One Year, $2.00 | ~ emma satin Six dey svn 1.00 CALDWELL & CLARK, _Propeterons. on Application. Thre Ss, | i Er eer = ——— Ez Tae BEADING WEEBELT WEWSPAPER IW WoRTE CAROLIITA. | fo re b aohs ey M™Ukellrudk bf Ql eT | ¥ K 4 Q 5 fae) B Q $ & “. w a a "SA opuUTH “pueleTow po roe: LAR Be: Seo! ease Bi Ft see JHA RO. ce | 4G | Mg ih Chart. I Zt - A fpront opts itty, thew gy Dip sein ras cron b The CEH GA. CA vi Ph. at-—mr Let O eS Cade, ee Th. Shag 4 24n7 Cor % oc oo we, (( tr dorre-e “91. d Ne & 4 A ae Hoh afin t Low apt tae Po fe eae a aun Zei A fom Sat & & or a SA Watle ops. vr tk Tf ae, len. em * ge —e< as 8: erica: td adap as resf:: _ ~ a i 2 for eeu penny ~— Cebiis: ee aa feu ) | Piteicayct HC 4 “ Mass REI WL at be a 7 ie, vs. _ Mclelland Charles x S v7 Bs zi ¥, Me Litlacit po hi kitta— ee Se tae, |= ioe Mann DT, eita rf at at as MS ARO a Anton — 2 Bic Drpi dae wha pie nits, ant Cav arith, mith Mira Orr tone fr Tie gear vl frreing licens SO AL Sin RL. L474 niin jill ve th. ach Emmitt “or gal Sy ee Des tne b receding mm. iit Be LAS vs. McLelland Charles SOTIEYD PUETTETOW Wek Ga bind dn fafeosre Gr arnrkiit Cin G Pra, Lr (579 Wit ae We Ketio—<_ [Lenin . i< \ s » i : N More Carey C eeelng oe teinrvel at Th. Fw. 1. Grr PU. ata dane becny Cearel ait The pany Haraz prt 44 TR He flames CHE ted, Rifrmela dt tree peer S'TLsd Sper racd fuer el Cot ti, Slate adh Dis fw abt, rh Kiln Mitt! Keak Marly] ey 6S ane y H, sted erm ce Ea tte, ng ee dk lm 1 Lark, of the A Brig ene? ag Fim iting Met tee tee, pee ha ee . ik, on. 7 C Shc. Arh erneiete Sal af Si» 3 Cort WMT, train of wisn. Np Pre ee Bum t i ain i Llane Lig how are gt opin ferme ete a Chet floily, La V., ea Fan, ag th wit gr pur Anny ad ate ede “ MeLelland, Minnie vs. McLelland Charles as £z oo we Comey & S 55 < y 616] SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Stateaville, N.C. Iredell County—lIn the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. sne the defendant._ above named, if be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court t> be held for the County of Tredeil at the Court House in Monday of 191°___ and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice jf e____they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this/-*:2 = day of OGcel vier of Superior Coie en at tk, tie qoun eens et. HPUULV[T 9Y} Jt “teaemoy JO WINS 94} UT “TOTjoR S14} UT ---~yuUBpuazac ayy jsumby SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Returnable to Term, 19F ___ oyun punoq 898A [98100 aS pe[Mouyoe oM of the Superior Court of ~~“STY} GU a1OJeq paqiiosqns pue 0} TIOMg AN a inna thr tet 9 a en ange lee gO ABP ------siyy “S[ves PUR spuvYy INO sseuzT\y i911 & ( ee VNV'IOMNVI HLYON AO ALVLS 70 Ao" ** ‘suoljnoexe Wory yduiexe Ajsodoid pue sarytiqety ‘syqop SIY 9AOge pue J9A0 "MOHOB SY} UL ~~~ ~~~“ PUUB[_ oy} JO 4aa0001 ABU ~-----guepuezaqy ay} sv ys00 "p4nog sorsadngy ay} uy ~~ ~~ JUBpUVyOd ou} ed Se i ee ee ee ee Le et Ary ————— -----fahdwelle ¢: dwell Plaintiff’s Attorney. \ i i = = -. 5 5 oR Zz = S S 5 5 & zr = > ® pee Dp = S | | = ® n = S = 5 > es) - S <= = ~ = mu 2 = tS a ‘PIOA aq 04 yons ][e ~ McNeely, John vs. McNeely, Laura 1919 North Curolins Superior Court John MeNeely, plainti j j Affid» vit of plaintif? to obtain Vs . , ‘ ie [ Service by publication, ‘War Melleely, defom@ant> | “oO oe? | / fe ' ’ wiu™ s Hin ieNeely BesheApLy sworn Says thet the defendant, Laura YoNeely, Cannot, after due diligence, he found within the State Carolihs, thit suid plointif? has g00d cause of actio > < . ¥ o i Said defendant, viz, to abt & Divorce from her upon th&t the def endant has departed the Or keeps herself where > GC ; be ound to avoid pro- nd that the Sheri ?: iS mad tu he Summond endorsea = 2 & < Be 5 "SA uYor “ATION of State of Nprt 616! McNeely, John vs. McNeely, Laura 1919 = o oA & “ 2 s 6l6l "SA uyor ‘AJOONOWy Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. | STATE OF NORTH GAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OP.......02¢< Ae f._.. County--GREETING*/ i fe z | sr“. ie YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO ee) ert eX 2 bona tecndtnnsuaesshtnghgerengarepecce-esenneseogencssee ys Mocsodh shad tebataabedeauseeuterpetapecaashduscpsmerchnbecnbocrhvessonanngencss next, then and there to testify. and the trith to say in behalf of ; ‘ 7 oat 4 eae Te ot ; a Tn in a certain béfore said Court depending, atid then and there tobe tried, wherein V2e,* Defendant........._ And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. -P . . WITNESS, sotenetnenaicengainensmnenecens ae bec een , Clerk of our said,Court, at office Gp Engi tenn neenscsermnon Monday after the KS ° _ 2 e. _ 3 E = "SA uyor ‘AJOONO|Wy 6161 < Q ie 9 “ c 5 616! "SA uyor ‘ATOONI North Carolina Superior Court Irefell County October Term 1918 John McNeely, plaintiff. Vs Complaint. Laura McNeely, defendsnt. The plaintiff complsins and says: First. That he and the defendant mrriecd about seven or eight years ago and lived together as man and wife for some time, when the defendant Committed adultery, ab ndone’ the plaintiff and sinee has not been in marital relations with him. second. That the defandant committed adultery with one Will Turner and others as plaintiff is informed and beleives. Third. The plaintiff has been a oitizen and resident of the State of North Carolina for miny yenrs, and had knowledge of the facts herein alleged as the cause of this action for more then six months prior to the filing of this complaint. Wherefore pliintif? prays: That the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff? and the defendant be dissolved: that plaintiff be declared free and release’ form all liability be reason of the mirriage aforesaid and for such other and further releif as my be just and right _Cakdnece -Gobsccc Counsel for plnaintif?. North Carolina Superior Court Irdell County. John McNeely being duly s orn says that the f-cts set forth in the Complaint are true to the best of affiant's beleif and knowledge, and that» the said Complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between husband and wife: not for the mere purpose of being freed and sepurated from each other, but in sincerity ond truth for the c-uses mentioned in the Complaint That the grounds for divorce have existed to plaitiffs knowledge at lexst for gix months prior to the filing of this Complaint, thet the plaintiff has been 2 resident of this State for more then two years prior to the filing of this Complaint of the is suing of the Sum-ons in this case. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the /® day of Atgust 1918 i a silt anil o K< o * s, _ i 5 ‘SA UYor “ATZON OY] 616! = QO a @ ©. - - E 9 616l "SA uyor ‘AJOONOW North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County October Term 1918 John McNeely, plaintiff? Vs Order of Publication. Taurn McNeely, deferidunt. a It apnesring to the undersigned Clerk of the Superior Court of Treiell County from the affidavit of the plaintiff in the above ‘ ‘ entitled action that the defendant ik Sas Sat helancs befound in Iredell County and State of North Carolina; therefore orde ' by the Court that notice of this actin for Six weeks in the Landmerk, nev'spnper publishe setting forth the title and csuce of action spoenr at the next ferm of said the sime being O%ctober Term 1918, Octover 14th, and the Conplai nt py of 1ic] ill be filed i ; which will mee wee ee ee ee McNeely, John vs. McNeely, Laura 1919 re -" * "y . a >. sa see =. = “NEE pte ates aA Giiiniacetaae aS aN oes in - re, Ss 2 o cas - the po] co = a "SA uYor “ATION 616 = Fs . “ _ fo 5 s 616! "SA uYOr “AJDONO North Carolina _ Superior Ceurt Iredell County - May Term 1919 John MeNeely, plaintiff Ve J,,dgment . Laura MeNeely, defendant. This cause eoming on to be heard at this tern of the Court before His Honor, Marding, Judge and a Jury and being heard and upon the whole reeord in the eause the Jury having feund the issues in faver of the plaintige; | : It is therefore eonsidered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the Plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved and the Plaintiff declared free and discharged from any and all liability because of the marriage in said eause. Myf / Judge Presiding. ‘ John MeNeely, plaintiff : Yes T Laura MeNeely, defendmt McNeely, John vs. McNeely, Laura 1919 aici , Wy ie es Es ) bes te Weep lain Li hak, Buy 3 — Fhe frou asia Sap ac agg aa (Ank alleges: | | hak buriehine Oteut th year POF A Mow. | Phage ows antraead Ai lek, Llein. | | listiccen te flail Gk ifs. | Mack ui Moca dB. hove, avoliia., Ha. | og etaul at Lab. Lice feciny a eine Gf Pricilt Carin , lanet Gana Licecn /\ | JKut OX Br Ahantl LB Oy tit» (880 chfucsaaat oe, <i - SA seuez ‘f[S°NOK eutudesor ‘ATSONOW eutudesor ‘ £TPONOW *SA seuez ‘ATSONOK | | @ew ct alleges : : || Pheak. dunelhine Ohaus Un Year HOF & Morn. | Carag zeae RT at ae CU laic. | Auk wr Ketoni. 2. Hort. Garona, fa. | | ag ews. auch frlicceclifiK co heec' of Cretett Grud , bowel Carakiccr | Jf Phot On Or ahuntl Lhe Of tt (88 / seca? A “furl, aud Berean Util, , ace of whan | Cifieccduuit 2th Connid Z Sach Gy | Pttepet Lie Latlnr whe hid dere epee | of: Meet ek 1 hae Cheraye hte Set cee | Laan oe fees fileages Perk. f. Qicpfitacicacl Wewen SA seuez ‘ATOONOW = Q = @ ~, gq Cu ° a 3 as ws 3 ® eutydesor ‘ £TOONOW *SA seuez ‘ATOONOW hooey pied Lheot Leer Stacflecil ov “eth oS Or beg CeClececen bahetrese = cat ane tel for Hie Mone | a SRR. OS ea le ne A eutyudesor ‘ATSONOW *SA eeuez ‘ATOONOW of pbacictif,, ant ~ r Selah ay a ae = oe oe a : Pies Corey | é ie, J V ) i} i 4 . ne a oo . Agee Seicci SA seuez ‘AT°ONOH eutudesor ‘ATSONOW McNeely, Zenas vs > McNeely, Josephine McNeely, Zenas : vs. McNeely, Josephine