Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDivorce Records 1855-1913 Gaither-Houpe ‘vy ‘f ‘soutien ‘youen) ‘SA ‘CG DOV 061 ¢€ & SUMMONS FOR RELIEF—Judge.—Printed and for sale at Mascot Printing Co., Statesville, N. C. T— sore III aCe = ISS See County.--In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of ee tte, ___County-GREETING : You are Aecreby Commanded to summon the Defendant above named, if Atc be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of te ALL - _. at the Court House in Ht. L- Z ssi on the é Monday after the fe Monday of Pit lath. ... the same being the. 42, day of Prey and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court fér said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant..... take notice if . “fe fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff...... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this, £2... day of Cifeak 190 . nerrentny CF A ez ‘ Clerk Superior Court of / Eee ve a. COuntY. *fguno) ino) 4o14adng ayz fo 4, ajqouanjoy Zz Nay JO, suowUNS “Rausony $.ff1quinid 061 ; fo fiop s1y} au a1o fag pagi4asgns puD 0} ULOMS ‘suoignaaxa mods jduaxa Rjsadoad pun $a1j171901) ‘87Qap Sty anogD pun 4ano sanijop pospuny om} fo wns ay} Y740M $1 OY shvs usoms butaq ("108$) ("79aS) ("798S) O61 ‘a ‘*V r fo fiop $1y) ‘sjDI8 pup Spuby 4NO SSauzM "u0179D $14} Ul Suyuwyg oy) fo 2900904 how quo -puofo(y oy; sp 7800 YONs 7]D° ** quepuafeq ey} find 7;0ys Muu oy7 {1 ‘aanamoy “pron aq 07 ‘8401/00 fo wins ay} ut ‘U0170D $1y7 Ut quppuasog oy} woe oqun punog saajasino abpajmouyan aM ‘INOU gsurpbivo ‘fiqunog "g4n0) LOrtsadng ay) UJ s (‘VNITOUNVO H.LYON SO ALV.LS “yf ‘ONO Ag ay “oqNeD £061 s | North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County, May Term, 1902. Alice D. Gaither, vs COMPLUA YN. _——— = —— ~~ J. Ae Gaither. The Plaintiff complains and alleges: First. That the plaintiff and the defendant intermarriea in the month of Noven- oer, 1891, and lived together as man and wife until about the fifteenth day of September, 1901, when the defendant abandoned her as hereinafter alleged; Second. That they have one child a little girl about the age of six years result of their union; Third. That from their marriage in November, 1891, until about the first of April, 1900, they lived together in peace and harmony with each other, and defendant during this time was good and kind to the plaintiff, and provided her with all the necessary comforts of life; Fourth. That the plaintiff is the second wife of the defendant, he having been mar- ried prior to his marriage with the plaintiff, and as a result of the first marriage there were seven children in the family, and at the time of the mar- s riage of the plaintiff and the defendant there were living in the family of I+na < defendant five of his children, three boys and two girls, who continued as members of his said family after his marriage with the plaintiff until their death or marriage; Fifth. That his oldest son, m. B. Gaither, married a sister of the plaintiff, and after their marriage went to house-keeping to themselves; that in the Spring of 1900, the said Wm. B. Gaither died leaving him surviving his wife; © & se) ’ that sooh after the death of his said son the defendant and his-daughter-in- law, the widow of the said Wm. B. Gaither, became involved in a controversy Over some né real estate in the City of Statesville, which lead to an estrangé- et) "y ‘f ‘JoqNeH ‘SA *C] 2OUV “rouyl 061 ¢ . ment of the friendly feelings between them; Sixth. That soon thereafter; to-wit; after the death of his said son, and after the unfriendly feeling existing between the widow and the defendant, the de~ fendant beeame indifferent to the plaintiff, which indifference continued from time to time until he beoame bitter and cruel towards the plaintiff, and aia from time to time offer such indignities to the person of the plaintiff " as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome by reason of his barbarous treatment and oruvel words uttered against her; Seventh. That on or about August, 1900, the defendant abused, cursed and calied her vile names, and said among other things "that he would not live with *he plan tiff any longer"; that during said month he told the plaintiff to quit gcing to the table with the family to eat, and if she did not he would quit going to the table to eat with her, and if she did not stay away from the table he would; and that during said time he woulda not permit her to exercise the right of a wife in his house and home, and woulda not permit her to prepare the ncas for himself and family, and when she aid he persistently refused *o eat, say= ing “that he wanted her to leave his home; that he did not care to live with : her any longer"; that all of this condvet on the part of the defendant was without provocation or cause on the part of the plaintiff; that prior thereto he was mad at the sister of the plaintiff and the wife of his son, “m B- now Gaither, game out of the controvers: alleged aforesaid, and that he abused the plaintiff's sister and mother because he thought that they were against him, and asked the plaintiff "s¢ she was with him, or with her mother in said matter"? ™o which she replied that she was having nothing to do with it; "that, of course, you could not expect me to be against my mother, al- though I am having nothing to say about the matter”, and the defendant asked her which was the nearest the mother or the husband, and she told him that she could not answer that question, and she declined to answer it; whereupon he became angry and used the words and language above set forth; that at said time they were living in the City of etatesville,and that his daughter by his first marriage, to-wit: Lizzie, was living with them, and she was the only child of the first marfiage then living with them; wighth. That his said daughter, Lizzie, during the month of August aforesaid, being ‘vif ‘yoyyeyH) “q aarp “JOUHED 061 “SA ¢ & Vv f ‘youyeyH Bt) ‘SAO soTV *jouy 061 ¢ 7. unfriendly to the plaintiff, did, on various occasions, call her vile names, "strum curse and abuse her, and among other things caller her “an old hussy", pet", "a fool”, and other similiar epithets, and when she called her hushahdé the defendant's attention, to his daughter's, Lizzie's, conduct to the plain- tiff he would not protect his wife as it was his duty, but permitted her to continue with her abuse; that by reason of his daughter's conduct he became more violent towards the plaintiff, and continued his cursing and abusing of nef, that she always tried to act the part of a good mother and friend to his daughter, and always endeavored to be a dutiful and faithful wife to the de- fendant, and tried to recocile their differences and live in peace and happi- ness to-gether; Ninth. That on account of the annoyance of the defendant to the family of the plan tiff, growing out of the difficulty aforesaid between his daughter-inlaw, and the sister of the plaintiff , who was then living vith their mother abovt sixteen miles from Statesville, he was forbidden to come to the home of her mother by the sister and daughter-in-law aforesaid; that about the last of August or the first of September, 1909, the plaintiff paid a visit to her mother, and remained with her there about a week, and on her return home the Gefendant asked the plaintiff what her ma said about his coming back there; that plaintiff replied that her mother said "she was not talking about him or his business", to which thé defendant replied "She is a liar, and a damed one, and you know it”. "Tt replied: ‘Al you know that is not so"; where- upon he got very angry and abused the plaintiff and struck her in the face and on the cheek bone with his fist, and also inflicted a severe pain by lick on the breast, and on the side of the head against the ear; that by reason of said wounds upon her breast and head inflicted by the defendant she suffered in body for ten or more days to such an extent that she was not able to rest with ease while lying down; that at the time he struck her, as she avers without provocation on her part, except as above set forth, he demanded of her to leave his home; that this took place upon Sunday, the first day of the week; Tenth. That Monday morning following she left his home and wat to her Aunt in the 4 City of Statesville, and on Wednesday following returned *o thé home 0! the defendant, hoping that she might reconeile their differences on account of the love and affection and interest which she had for her only living child, and remained there some three or four days, and during this time he was abso- lutely indifferent to her comfort or her wants, and refused to live with or permit her to enjoy his home as his wife; that he asked her “What she a-going to do"; she being afraid to talk with him said nothing in reply. He then repeated his demand, saying, at the same time, "You have got to do something”. Te plaintiff then said " T don't know what to say; I have got to the place where I am afraid to say anything", but did say: “ IT will leave if I can get my child”. He said in reply, "Go, but you shall not have the child. He then said if she did not leave he would, and after say ing this he became violently mad, and struck her on the head with his fist, and said for her to leave, but she could not take their little daughter, Deu- lah. She left and in a few days returned, hoping that she might live with her child, anti that they, the plaintiff and the defendant, might still recon- cile their differences; Eleventh. That after her return aforesaid she remained until the 15th day of Septem- per, 1901, and from her last return up to the date last above mentioned, he still continued to curse, abuse and offer indignities to her person such as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome, as he had done here- to fore, and as above set forth; and on said 15th day of Spetember, 1901, he said to the plaintiff, that he had no more use for her, and asked her why she kept staying at his home, and demanded of her that she leave forth- with. Seeing that he would not permit her to remain in peace at her home and enjoy the associations of her child in peace, and that he proposed to con tinue his indifference, cruel and barbarous treatment, and being unable to endure it she left and went to the home of her mother, the home of her child- hood where she was surrounded by loving parent, kind and affectionat broth- ers and sisters, and where she had lived in peace and happiness up to the time of her marriage with the defendant; Twelth. That after the abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant, and after the separation aforesaid, on the 15th day of September, 1901, she asked of the “y ‘f ‘romeo “youyey ‘SA “SHV C06! ireimrmutemprtinar cee wa eToys tein aren encanta mbit tener oe: LO ERNMENT HMI SAMIR Dar 8 mT Siege K se MRTETTAMNTS \ defendantthat she might be allowed to take with her to her mother her only child, a little girl, who much needed the car and attention of a mother. He refused this request, but during her absence on her way home she found her little girl at the home of a neighbor nearby when she took her with her to her mother's, where she, the plaintiff, is now living; that avout two weels thereafter the defendant came tc the home of the plaintiff's mother,where she and the little child were then living and Gehde cared for, accompanied by neg friend Offie Stikeleather, and the rlaintiff was asked by Mr. Stike- leather if she had any objections to the @eféndant'’s seeing their child, to which she replied "No", and walked to the gate with the child. At this time the defendant came to the gate, and seeing that no one was at home with the plaintiff took the child, placed it in the buggy and drove away, and from that time up to the present he has persistently refused to allow the child ct i Fh to visit the plain > Thirteenth. That the cefendant d his daughter live in Statesville at the home where the plaintiff and the defendant lived before their separation, that the de- fendant is a man of violent temper indifferent to the moral, intellectual, and industrial training of his children, and permits his daughter to use such language within the hearing of his little child, as will tend to encour- age it in wrong-Going, thus depriving it of all the necessary training that it should rdceive while, go young and of tender age, that her said child is in need of a mother’s care and moral and religious training; and that there is no hope for it to receive such care as it deserves while remaining in the home of the defendant subject to the influences above set forth; Fourteenth. That the pléintiff has alweys striven +o be a useful, dutiful and cbedient wife, and to perform all the duties required of a good mother to her chil- Gren; that her love and affection for her child is so great that she would be ure unwilling for it to remain longer in the home of the defendant with é#e pres- ent environments; Fifteenth. That the defendant is about fifty-five years of age and in réasonable health and by his industry has been able and is able to make a reasonable income rc -5— ‘Vv ‘f SUD 9 SAG] 20ITy “JOUNE > & [061 “SA "q 20tT “JOqNLD 6 | ¢ & for the use and benefit of himself and family; Sixteenth. That he is the owner of the following property, to-wit: -1- A house and lot on the corner of Stookton and Tradd Streets in the City of Statesville on which is situated a six-room cottage of the value of one thousand dollars, Qud Unm Ant C esky hety Mra 7 prteieaK% G00 < -2- That he owns on Tradd Street in said City of Statesville a lot on which is situated a tobacco-box factory with all the necessary machinery for oper- ating the same, and that it is reasonably worth, $1@0 025-5 ~5- That he owns a twenty acre farm in Turnersburg Tewnente near the homeof the plaintiff, sixteen miles from Statesville,on whioh is situated a good Gwelling-house of seven or more rooms, together with all necessary out—build- ings, and that the same is reasonably worth six or eight hundred dollars, -4- That he has considerable personal property consisting of household and kitchen furniture, horses, cattle, farming implements, wagons, buggies, etea., reasonably worth five or six hundred dollars; Seventeenth. That the plaintiff is a resident of North Carolina, and has been for more than two years priorto the filing of this complaint; Eighteenth. That the plaintiff has no means of her own upon which to support herself, nor has she sufficient means whereon to subsists during the prosecution of this suit, and to defray the necessary and proper expenses thereof; that she is now living with her mother in North Iredell about sixteen miles from Statesville, where she is being provided with all the necessaries of life, and on whom she is dependent for a living in the absence of any support from her husband; WHEREFORE SHE PRAYS: -~l- That she be granted a divorce from bed and board; -3—- For a permanent alimony; -3- For alimony pendente lite; ~4— For the custody of their child, Beulah, and for such other and further relief, as she may be entitled to. LAS fs Mit tttran....- Attorneys for Petitioner. Alice D. Gaither being duly sworn maketh oath that the facts set forth Fe ee ee Oe ee = fener skit i in the above complaint are true to the best of affiant's knowledge and be-= lief; and that the said Complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and the defendant; and that the same is not made for the mere purpose of heing freedand separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the Complaint; and that the factsset forth in the aforesaid Complaint as grounds for divoree have existed to her knowledge at least six months rrior to the filing of this her Complaint; and that the Complainant has been a resident of North Carolina for two years next preceeding the filing of this Complaint. : , , 7 co Mis cee! Aiea Subseribed and sworn to before me a kori..M.gaifhies this the -O-aay of April, 1902. “y ‘f ‘soqeyO wey) ‘sa sory 4 £061 © e. = 2 ° x a > a. o ~ 5. i si oO n e & oO v < vi 061 € Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale at the LanpManx Jon Orri B, Statesville, N. C. STATE OF ee To THE SHERIFF OF Jr reee personally to appear before thetwigtof Superior Court, at the next Court to be held tor our said county at the Court House in.. lat iE Defenden And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law Witness: de ro gota , Clerk of our said Court, at office in Monday after the Monday jn , : 3 County. vant bed oe =: 2 Qo ." — , © p 5 @ :* - = o o < r £06! TATE OF pssst CAROLINA, (L REETING, ei DLO frre. Xe _ Civil Rs: —Printed and for sale at the LANDMARK Jon Orri°k, Statesville, N, C. House in on the: aoe -_ ae fe fam, .$a oe Th. e — next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of QD Arne >a. in a certain controversy sy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein A * Plaintiff .........., and mere , And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. personally to mY, before the ee, ce Superior Court, at the next Court to be bela for our said county at the Court « “ a -) & Len ae Defendent ‘ Witness , Clerk of our Sand Courk at office in Dn ¥ ie "x Monday after the a di Of. ‘donde : Superior Court for "yf “soqHeD sa" 201 “294 £061 en) eee. SOREN Fl Megs 7 a T te: 189 a. sn 7$ 3 ney (SC 1e~ 139 sey ca ia oe -— or North Carolina In the Superior Iredell County May Term 1902 Alice D. Gaither. vs ANSWER. JeAe Gaither, The defendant answers the complaint and says; 1---That he admits the allegations contained in the lst paragraph of the complaint, except that portion thereof, which alleges that he a- bandoned the plaintiff and this he most emphatically denies. 2---Defendant admist the allegations of the 2nd paragraph of the com plaint. 3<-~ Defendant admits that he and the plaintiff lived together in peace and harmony as alleged for some nine or ten years and regrets that since about April 1901, that he and the plaintiff have not lived together, but avers that the fault is not of this defendant, 4-~-Defendant admits the allegations contained in the 4th paragraph of the complaint. 5--~ pefendant admits the allegations contained in the 5th paragraph of the complaint to be true, but is unable to see or understand why such is incorporated in the complaint, as it is foreign to this actia not pertinent thereto, and is an attempt to resurrect the dead to give stability to the living. 6=---Defendant admits that there exists between himself and the widow of Wm B. Gaither, unfriendly relations, which defendant says has noth ing to do with this controversy and all the other allegations con- tained in said paragraph are not true and are denied. %=--Defendant denies each and every allegation contained in the 7th “y ‘f ‘IoyNeH ‘sa °C 20ITy “OUD C06! wey ‘sa “GQ ITV 494 £06! paragraph of the complaint, except that which alleges that his daugh ter, Lizzie, lives with the defendant and that she was the only child of the first marriage living with then. 8---Defendant denies each and every allegation contained in the 8th paragraph of the complaint, except that portion which alleges the conduct of his daughter to the plaintiff and of this he has no knowl edge or information, but exceedingly doubts the accuracy of the same as no act or word of his daughter has ever been seen or heard which would lead this defendant to beleive such. 9---Defendant says that he has never given the people of the plain~ tiff any trouble or annoyance by his conduct, unless his determina- tion to protect his rights and property from the mercinary hands of those who aided not in producing the same, could be an annoyance; that defendant was forbidden to come upon the lands or to the home of his mother in law where defendant's wife was harbored; all the other allegations in said paragraph are not true and are denied. 10--Defendant admits that on or about the 24th day of June 1901, the plaintiff left his home and went to the house of some of her relative where she ever received advice hostile to him and condusive to her c continued and self imposed separation from this defendant, and all the remaining allegations contained in said paragraph are not true K and are denied..That while his said wife was at the home of same of : relatives in Statesville, this defendant made repeated efforts to see her and prewail upon her to return home, but all to no avail, she was joined to her idol and defendant was compelled to let her alone ll--Defendant denies each and every allegation contained in the llth paragraph of the complaint, unless it be that portion of said paragr graph which alleges that she went" to the home of her childhood, the home of her mother, where she lived in peace and happiness up to the time of her marriage with the defendant," but defendant alleges that while, perhaps, unable to make her surroundings such as she had been accostomed to, he did all in his power to make her happy and comfort able, treated her kindly and gently, bore with her faults as he shoul have done and exceedingly regrets that after many years of associatin sorrow and death, that charges of esuelty, desertion and brutality shoulda be alleged against him; that it is not true; it is unkind, and defendant beleives it is only the carrying out of a pre-arranged plan upon the part of her kindred to harass and humiliate this defendant. 12<--Defendant denies the allegations contained in the 12th paragraph of the complaint and alleges that the plaintiff, 3n company with her brother , took said child against its will, not as alleged while on her way home, but when going to the home of the relative hercinbefore alluded to, and dragged said child through the streets of Statesville unmindful of its pitious appeals to be taken back to this defendant, who was not at home at the time. That defendant has not taken said child to the place where the plaintiff resides, because of the fact, that he has been forbidden to come upon the premises, but has repeate ly requested the plaintiff to come to the little farm near where she stays and meet the child there, but this she refuses to do. That he tries to be a law abiding citizen and does not want to cormit a tres pass, much less subject himself to insult and threatened injury. 13-~Defendant admits that he lives at his home in Statesville with his daughter, Lizzie, but denies he is a man of violent temper, in- aifferent to the moral, intellectual and industrial training of his 4 * children; he denies that his said daughter uses bad and vile language 5 of any kind or that there is any thing in her character that will not compare favorable with that of her traducers. It is true that she has, for many years, been deprived of the gentle, refining and chris tain influences of a blessed mother, long since departed, but says that for some ten years or more, while her young character has been forming and moulding, she has lived in the same home with the plain tiff, and if her character is 80 repulsive, she having been reared "yf ‘ouNED quey ‘SAG TV 7 £061 “y ‘f ‘OUND £061 ‘youyey "SA" OHV and raised in the company of the plaintist , what hopes could be en= tertained for the child, yet Sener. in years, whose oustan is here sought to be dbtained. 14-~ Defendant says that it would be un natural for the plaintiff not to love and charish the child, her off-spring, but defendant denies all the other allegations in said paragraph. 15--Defendant admits his age; admits that he has been able to make a living and hopes to continue to do so, but if harassed with litiga tion and humiliated by charges of cruelty to his wife, which he de- nies, he doubts his ability much longer, to "make tongue and buckle mect",. 16-~ Defendant denies that he is the owner of the house and lot des- cribed, but says that he has a vacant lot for which he paid $120. he says that he has a location for a furniture or box factory, with. an old house thereon, but that there is no machinery or equipment there in as alleged, and that the same is not worth more than $175. That he has a small tract of land containing 28 acres assessed for taxa- tion at about $300. and this is far in excess of its proper assess-~- ment; that he has two horses, both under mortgage, and one cow; he regrets that he has not more of this worlds goods, but that disease and death has garnered very cleanly his fields, until his home is now left unto him almost desolate, save only the love and affection of his daughter, Lizzie, and the samll child, sought to be taken from him in this action. That of all the children said to have been his, death and the grave have claimed them nearly all, and those yet left him share his penury and mourn with him in his loss. 179~ Defendant admits the allegations of the 17th paragraph 18--Defendant admits the allegations contained in the 18th paragraph of the complaint and says, as he has often said, that the plaintiff RL i 3 NO LN ERIE ERIE: TERE ABET A ge i nina has known his financial condition all these years; that he has pro- vided for her all the " necessaries and comforts of life"; has lived with her in peace and harmony until she began to listen to the se- ductive wooings of her kindred, unmindful that she and defendant became one flesh; that he has been kind and good to the plaintiff, and is now and ever been willing and able to make a living and will continue to do so, if she will return to his home and be content with such as he can provide,and dis-entangle herself from the evil influ ences of those who are at enmity with this defendant. That he has tried in all ways to get his said wife to return home and such as he has, will he "give unto her", T°at he desires to end his life in peace and happiness and find some where to lay his weary head and find rest even when a frowning world is freezing up the fountaind of sympathy and love. Wherefore he prays; (1)That the prayer of the petitioner for divorce from bed and board be not granted. (2)That having freely and voluntarily, without cause deserted and a bandoned the ddfendant, that no alimony be granted unto the plain- tiff, either permanent or pendente lite. (3) That the chstody of the child be not, granted to the plantiff. (4) For such orders as the Honorable Court may deem defendant entitle ed to. RC. Calsurcec. Attorney for defendant. J.A-Gaither being duly sworn says, that the foregoing answer and every part thereof is true, as of his own knowledge, except as to those matters and things therein stated upon information and beleif and as to those, he beleives it to be true. Sworn to and subscribed This /@ May 1902 SA °C 20 “OUND 061 € Gaither, Alice D. vs. Gaither, J. A. 1903 “y ‘f ‘soqNeH £061 rep) ‘sa “q aotty 494} North Carolina, Superior Court, Iredell County. August Term, 1902. Alice D. Gaither, v8 AFFIDAVIT. dee Ae Geither: E. G. Gaither, brother of the Plaintiff, being duly sworn, de- poses and says: That he is a brother of the plaintiff, ALice D. Gaither, and is acquainted with the facts herein-after set forth, and this affidavit is made by him for the reason that his sister lives some sixteen miles distance in the country: That at May Term of. Irdell Superior Court His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, made an order, on motion of the Plaintiff's counsel in the a- bove entitled actiom, which is now pending im the Superior Court of said County, that the defendant, J. A. Gaither, pay to the Clerk of the Superior Court: on the 15th day of each month the sua of Fifteen Dollars, as alimony pen dente lite for the use and benefit of the affiant, the plaintiff in the above cause: That the defendant has neglected and refused to pay the Clerk of the said Court the amounts aforesaid, as ordered by the Court, and still refuses to pay the same: That Fifteen Dollars of said alimony was due on the 15th day of June, and Fifteen Dollars the 15th day of July; and that there is now due and payable to the Clerk 2eme@eemder the sum of Thirty Dollars, and there will be due on the 15th day of this month a further sum of Fifteen dollars, making a sum total due on the date last above men- tioned of Forty-five Dollars: Said defendant has wilfully and contemptously refused and neg- lected to pay said amount and to obey the orders bf the Court made in the abowe entitled cause allowed as alimony to the plaintiff, as above set forth: Wherefore; The plaintiff prays the Court to issue an order upon the defendant requiring him to appear before His Honor, Walter R. (Neal, on a day fixed by the Court, and show cause why he shall not be i, adjudged in contempt of Court for disobedience to its orders, and neglect and refusal to pay the alimony aforesaid, as allowed by the Court. Sworn to and subseribed before me this the abe day of August, 1902. © e = is & .” _" > on i) & = - a oO .* -, zs" o o < fs £061 ren) Vv or ‘youyeyH) ‘sa sotTy JOU £061 North Carolina, Superior Court, Iredell County. August Term, 1902. Alice D. Gaither, vs J. A. Gaither. ) ( ) ) ( ) ( ) It appearing to the Court from the affidavit of Ernest G. Gaith- er that the defendant, J. A. Gaither, has wilfully and contemptously disobeyed the orders of this Court in that he failed to pay into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County thesum of Fifteen Dollars a month as alimony pen dente lite fot the plaintiff in the abowe entitled action, as ordered by His Honor, Thos. J. Shaw, at the May Term of this Court: It is therefore ordered that notice begiven to the said defend- ant to appear before His Honor, Walter. Neal, Judge Presiding, on Friday,the 15th day of August, 1902, at ten o'clock, and show cause, if any he has, why he should not be adjudged in contempt of Court. heel. Gaither, Alice D. vs. Gaither, J. A. 1903 Cut y ke ath,’ ~~ f—~ oh. Lr Hh Cog. oF len am aw i IS ele aa) 4 (he Gee. co fie ie ee page | tg gE & fo wg Gi ee yp he On het A 2 et Si Me 3 Bian Ai A. 62 fe Cet Sai eo Aa aan ti C OLY 7 baler Bh 2 © o 2 e. &. > S Oo 2 oe - > >s i o v 061 ¢ MS “SA 7 Gaither, Alice D. vs. Gaither, J. A. 1903 Er Civil rene For sale at The Mascot Job Office, Statesville, N.C STATE OF “NORTH CAROLINA. To the Sherif of Dip hoe l= ebay ceding? You are ee Commanded to’ guanine Mh Va personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Ber at tla next Court to be held be said Cgafnty, fat the Court House in &. AL. eee a eS A ee thes: ey. ee ye Motiday PRG aise siGekaciens } teh os hop ead Monday, in ag... ‘ Sidhe sheen he next; théa ae tifere 6 testify and 1e truth to say in behalf of...... i ar- : . ‘ in a certain controversy before sé¢ Clerk of our said Court, at office in v. A foosessssssseeeesMonday after the.....,...... acs Monday ~~ es 2 Ge =" > oO ,” r ©) & a a oO = > cE oO o < y 6l ¢ & ee mere nee ete nnn teen nnn ener ahem n —¥ *. “ ‘se L “ ‘ + a * Civil Subpena. th Adee? 16 FOS ee FIO ap hear a ha Nt NE i ERE ao = © — a ss gs — > >s r oO = "SA C06! aot Fs) Civil Subpoena—For sale at The Mascot Job Office, Statesville, N ; n.&. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. To the Sheriff of Pre gece frownty—Greesing You are hereby Commanded to sp - Le, personally to Court House in after thie AE oa fecsonric 5 ai obecres Monday. in...»..... Pa. F us Plaintiff Defendant is hall in no wise ogiit, under the penalty prescribed by law. Vg. Aon. Fine Lidia sekiediabeapacapeebone Clerk of our said Court, at office in Monday © © S, &. =— = ao s > >a . o uv “SA £06! of speteeneee Defendant.\... bonne cenene y ~< % 7 eS bane -+- ose n gt s-- $+ - 4! 5 Gaither, Alice D. vs. Gaither, J. A. 1903 eee ISSUES. Pirste ock pro} the vxeeutdien of the noctge ge toethne: plain iff? ANKN2."« “yf ‘sqNED “q sorry “FoqHeD “SA £061 © oO =] P tT} a s, o 616l “SA IBISEC) “UUZIH SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. 0. County—In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Garolind., To the Sheriff of Pe. YOU ARE HEREBY COMI the defendant_. above named, if be found within your yj to be and appear before the Judge of our py Sn at a Court to be held for t County of hha Monday the. - -¢_-_: Monday of the same being restart 19. ., and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Copyt for said County; within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice ees fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. , Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Fe Tee Bela Sas FY Aekemoy “"""""F0 UMS OY} UT “HOT}OR SY} UT ~-~~yUBpuVszacy oy} yumby VNI'IOMNV) HLYON JO ALVLS ‘suOIjNDeXe WoIy yduioxo Ajzodoid puv serjIqQeT] ‘s}qep Sty eAoge puB s92A0 EE ee ee ere ern “WOT}OR SITY} UI ~--~~"yHUTe[T oy} Jo 1aA00e1 Avut ~-----yUEpuesec] 94} se 4S00 *yAnog sorsadng ay} uy _Sheriff__@-? a ~~zCounty ee ere a ar DIOMG awe eee ee eee A; ce ‘s[vos PUB Spuvy ano SSOTI MA ' ' ' ' t ! ' ' t ! i ' ! ' ' ' ' i ' i ! i t ' ' ' ' ! ! 1 ' j ' ; ' ' ! ‘ z 5 og a = i) 5 5 < a iz ® = an =< S a S ot S ® wn S S 5 ° ee et <= <= S > s 5 5 Qa 5 © & mu Vine Gl th Pine OF a agen ee ek PTE CE ca el a es Spa] MouyOR OM qons [je ~-~"""jyuepuszeq ey} Aved [jeys------~------- DOA OG OF MABTORINT T-Sh cman has eer Tee ee SaiB[jop Plaintiff’s Attorney. Glenn, Oscar vs. Glenn, Estelle 1919 QO Oo oO BB aS o om wv 6161 North Carolina | Superior Court fredell County October 21 1918 Oscar Glenn, plhkintiff. { Vs bcricawst of plaintiff to obtain service Rstelle Glenn, defendant. {by Publication. Oscar Glenn, plaintiff?’ in the above entitled action makes oath that the defendant @stelle Glenn cannot after fue diligence be found within the State of North Garolina; that plaintiff has a good Cause of action against said defendant, namely an action for divorce upon the grounds of adultery, that the Summons in said action has been returned by the Sheriff of the County, "defendant not to be found in Trefell Tounty and State of ‘orth Vsarolina” Sworn to and subscribed before me this )ct 2lst 1918 , sus Ser Zan AMAMLLA. undersigned Slerk of the Superior Court of Irdell efendant is 1 necescary party to the «bove entitled annot after due iiligence be found returne he Summons endors-d "d lina and Lredell % summons six weeks ‘ ik rs / ° Ts ? f : vn O'R on z wsp:perpublished i rede row sommunding the AaAnnenT it hla creme Ril a da ee eee alae ~ Oscar Glenn, plaint Ys Estelle Glenn, defend»nt Affidavit to obtain order of Publication. Orfer of Publication Glenn, Oscar vs. Glenn, Estelle 1919 C) @ 5 tT 2 @ o 616! "SA IBISO “UUIH North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County January Term 1919 Oscar Glenn, Plaintiff. Vs Complaint. Estelle Glenn, Defendant. The plaintiff complains and says; First. That he and the defendant married in January 1918 and lived together as man and vife until about October 1917, when the @efendant left the plaintif? and has not since lived with him. Second. That the defendant comnitted adultery with John Tally, Monroe Flint and others as plaixtif?’ ts informe’ and beleives. Third. ‘intif? has live? in the State of North Carolina all his life had knowledge of the facts alleged herein for more than six institution of this action. he prays that the bonds of matrimonry existing defendant be dissolved and for such other and ind right. Cablbeueee x OCB u< at. Counsel for the plaintif:. 2 oO B tr Q e o "SA JBISO “UUd[DH 616I Oscar Glenn being duly sworn says, that the facts set forth ‘in this Complaint are true to his knowledge and beleif; that said Complaint is not made out of.levity or by collusion betweenhinself and the defendant and not for the mere purpose of being freed and sepa rate’ from each other out in sincerity and truth for the causes set forth in the Somplaint; that the facts set forth in said Complaint,as grounds for divorce have existed to his knowledge more than six months prior to the filing of the Complaint and that he has been a resident of the State for more than two ycaré next preceeding the riiing of the Complaint. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 2Ffaay of October 1918 Pe Ah 2 Ziad 2 / ™ 4 Pe ™ VALIOA ys Nf MF ps / “_% as Glerk Superior Court. 2) oO = tr ”n & o "SA IBISC “UUIIH 616! Statesville, N.C. day 23219 39) M__Clerk of Court, J A Hartness, Iredell County Circulates Among the Best People Established 1892 Of Iredell And Adjoining Counties : At “Oscar Giennvs tell Gienn Tongan Turney Attys ~O8ce THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL CO., Inc. PUBLISHED MONDAYS AND. THURSDAYS (An ad in Tine Sentinel ba ine tetvesteniind-"Not 0. grateilathcan.) 1 BAL DUE REMARKS --+-—_——_} ___ AMOUNT OF SPACE USED ANDDATE rae Fae) 5 aie rast ___ |{Petal tn AMOUNT || )e | | 9 |10} 10 | 18 20 4 nD ip Gown thal a Sle eg RE eI Ms ip Rc NN i inet all toe ©) @ 5 33) BQ @ o "SA IBISC “WUIIDH 616! Q North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County : May Term 1919 Osear Glenn, plaintiff Ve J,,dgment . Estelle Glenn, defendant. This cause coming on to be heard at thie term of the Court before His Monor, Harding, Judge and a Jury and being heard and upon the whole reeord in the eause the Jury having found the issues in favor of the plainti£f; It ia therefore eonsidered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are hereby dissolved and the plaintiff declared free and disehareed from any and all liability because of the marriage in said eanse. Hifi Judge Presiding. / Q) © ® & BB 1 © a $ rs 6161 Osear Glenn, plai ntiff : Ve Estelle Glenn, deft Glenn, Oscar vs. Glenn, Estelle 1919 Q) ® 5 a @ Oo 616! ‘SA IBISQ “UUa[H Bill of Costs—Civil—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Co., Statesville, N. C. \ Te . y ] Original Summons, or othgs, satand oh PS RY No. Docket_____: __]] Every copy of same Bond, including Justification. . .,. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT |e tech J. Lf | Appeal from Clerk to Judge. County. Order for enlarging time of pleading =|] Interlocutory Orders. Attachment, Order in Crea Ll Injunction Order, including Bond and Justification. . . . f At AAA eet Order of Arrest Subpoena, each name Against Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian AeA | Continuance Caveat. to ajwill, entering and docketing & Issuing Commission Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate Seal.) . ¢ y = Judgment Against Notice’, Notice, for each name over one in same paper ninscirenasite hia dairies a tethaicalictawn ad lecsaeisaiersciohipiiiespidis dintcahitieata and Impaneling! Jury , Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk... Judgmént in favor of Widow's Year's Support Dockefigg same D ing éx parte Proceedengs Judgement Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgement. Sherriff's Return . . County Tax, when jury impaneled . . Referee's Allowance Constable. Magistrate Plaintiff's Witnesses. . . ae oe oe “a Defendant’ PS ia see fe on Motion, Entry and Record of bkooy aAent ; Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal . . ‘Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS~CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) =. y Ainge = an Pa Glenn, Oscar vs. Glenn, Estelle 1919 et eg Stciwe. Slale x er Paes ces has beeced | Whe srente Centiereceecfs, A214 | ln >licfK, Ke cies Fonahengen. Atecte La Loeet cen A filucnity Ai1telk afijre Pe eects: 2 4 Atrt1s5 Lo wrertify Jn hg ath Meters anes Jerte-et, Loew 1 tfiecr | 422k Blecdi1 te Ler Corte five pen Wa Ctl. Gert Ctaadt Men. Mae Litman Gun. ftewra Lestclis arhrernt wens ot he paces fe errecet oven Lief Centar, wee eae tae aee ae ee ee es Ciba: ses —s patie Lt Aecclewes piltitr, % Jor<ferere A preece oh Ao eare Y Luwte Spor hemche GY Cat el | — élr1t, iain Alpen Tt ~~ 2 bLainlat, fr ec fre Beevezias/ t Arrcpe fetecneZl ere 1 CentierreS An A Sti, tify rele Aeragee tT teste Asa, Me leernce L443 Erect fly tuto 40 Ainunaive T prufereer ee oe ae pfefeurel Cutnre, aun «zuarkKk Lr oo wri bite weir A$ tered f oa et re “9 soup ‘feu “SA "WH YoueBIEy ‘hen head af Cer LIM. 4serred Leis 44h 3 (ne eg oe Ln cfr Pec seed his S LreCtec S$ Cet FA, Oe. etiewl tee Atoms AIEEE reek oO crc!) eka. Mow, An Pee. lé ate MDE oan age tev C ht Led IES Fone, WZ ies we CX. plier jrelCtr1t., lr ia i aert 3 off ee ee ce Lecce? Lsoctiion ctr Arek en C1-ee 71: <, Ce2ete( c f Ole € occ vet Ah ere er tt Coie brad tevettatit tenon ce CO licy de lee tee eek ALLL ited: Soe Mt ae a . ; ii seg tcc etez Z £14 tte CH te ol Cue ; Ltr ” ae a Z, tit “ter . A ¢ “+e Ltt J Lee cod i lk bic. himeder NS be eo a. Lece? od 4 AO erecreccrec€, ieee | A. Cat ema a tpeiles seed Cece Pit ah tere ig, Pa ctetcec:d Ail e her, flr i ALL b2etee Silo. — Ainieti eet ut lw pelrce, ‘ A, bine «ite epee Leg ced plex fre tend, Aer Leecl0tO Lec..e i sii ene Leb bee ai ay ieed oe "yeh re agree Crgete Ler Lezet Liekc af | flint f, 22121 gavccaA heer Capt 2 eu ctls. Orcs Mecolesi cera thex ZBext Loc Ft Cor<~ Aen fn Atte fit Se tee { tin hc Lea 447 gerticrk a Cotati. htt” Cherri OA Geleernrty? VE tee 6 ink | F — a Beetere Cet. fitness ae. i 4324< A2r Lee4 44eC 1 fos ESB te Cre cl _ Ait AO Ke Ga Cerro forheces fer i fecal, trtlevderes Lo tczter€ 4 Ads Maia: bau te, aan Leal Ye Ccete lo Lo-wd 7t-te 1: ele: oo LCe ot; Ji etuT grea tx g a Q . < a . F é ; reset gtr eet poe 3 tical pert Aeiutiae ge Mee Levies 0th. Md Mh Fe ' AI Dae Gri ctenthern, Ceol at PO tea Crefecten A Caveco Cee y, ,trteer Grey Ceres lecesect. Catalan | ee y org ec ece baet0 S222’ et or2e ce a for Jy og | FECHA CR EV i aetcaliaale A AFEeee€,. ex eo. |e et Ewa 4 flced a 4 Crzte ae lo Lecce | 42 CC te oe, Coevlcre7reect hex le2274te 0 e272 Leeace JA late A Mewceey Vilicrtih, terre Fae a Lees Core tk ls t0cdireg Lace leg oO | Erg, etre weer se se 2 ee ee tulifn eds fer “ar Jesces prefer, feel hx A fee ie atl Pu ge Pte [eet cof placerat fp. lathe’ eenree Cte LC og car Arixere 5 a aot tuclh Ue luereteg ff Dadd&eu Gervenr Aes Mn ae ed. Lives q earth Aer Get. Aerur 2 Ato fp eet hard Arena“, Vleed Cy Ma oe, a ae, Ga Ces pitline LOU EY lof wher Cramnclecr Atti, te Ao Bt fh, Cxce1tff Certerecee CG, Hea? Aer Leceet thea gatas EUZEG . Ceaatthe Nite a Lond (nKyz fe ztel fan fs [Peace ocee ch by 1 fee zee) Pi ie. eed, Alaa OO oe ies OH L022 fecergS toocth act A fla Ceee~c tnd firiece tol Gle« Czze fee Cezect Ptecrciel | | pant litc~eCe1wsz101 eel. Cer. ( tr Zecee2we = OD frefietrate Cay ltwes Guts aA Gy ferric gs B ne Marea cl tn Am At feet fev daieite Cee ae te oa tbe 2PZe 2 tC Ce at |S Ply Boor Oa re a ZUZretetr ato | ieczec’ fc eectrcud Mace fle jtCeeer Col F ix lent Brae, oe eae: Auth Comccscicacl eee. aot —| -2 cf, (Aecnrerv Z2rere ne Lo Wile ke: CKcefZit ter Cert are PICetttte1, A277 Aetonaiee 222th ge ct vpaere Zeecct Ate, LCezee_ Creregecag 4 fii-ae flere hen , 2220 okie Lar ecc en) pCi ZG. Pid Lee. A»z226Ad Coe, . Leo i ae. Fe ct re ae ae pre Ze Lier . orm _ ASL Ze Ac frehleec a OPE ek Leoweel_, Ler Cea z4 ow Lf, LY) fice OY fecet< Off Lleol 2224 OZC+ at ae C= imme Zezec a Me eo or : | ey ?. Mo Cetth 71, Ac at Cat esctai ae pCa ffe7 pr ie L eS cartes Va Zt nan a ae Zettrt jeluen CA x. Aes Sahay cateln lead Yer , aurct aw Eee 5 CMLfuc Lee Fe aon flrm. Cerefecr: cert, BE Leer te Gf tirde kn a ea C224 Yt er phe C4241 Aecrec21e79 aie PBC hte te . af heer Lawitditnteeaswe ae {|i yYOCrtewsicttd§del “rer er DBD Me che Cael es. | o2) Wye -4? ofnrs 7°44] ?Df) ~ FP - ~er $ f s 7 toy A vee”. _- ee ae v Ne oetae of ae Caceclet1 cia Lhd eb cite tec Yeltz "a ae "a “ as sf ts oe dV A eos oo Avex Coe a ‘te 4 47€1 234 teP bt Ra, L1he++ Ole~ Lived Lee. ek AE tos a: Sit < =f lef £C CloeSeC Zttle 7 s Fierers X / —ae “oo a Fo * f pr t pre0orrt 1 yew 2 ata 71 7°40 r? t = LU = ee nes \ % +0 oe wre % S RUIAIRaN_arieainenenaiaee ee e Joe iy Risregceso|| eer (ancl Crcakey Keccele & CEE. phe, caw & greece ita ee Aher<er leferrdcerel 22 Fit” Lete a Acer Conf i la C1 22-2200 2 5 2: ae pe Brow C?, hc alto bee Seek 1222, A SOoCte. CoceL0C L203SYC Lipa Cee (ee. Avs ad etal. ey anes eek Ller pruflecl, a2k ffecee Gf ie AI gee Baia. <I A Cagectic, Mia’ CCaia41try Ar wetdad Aa Certr, Len €-<~ jJsred<1eCer Mi Aneto eee YY lve CY HutCwcw A @eerre as prow: ® EM i ae Of J Ahuitiae laws A fh Konak ieee. Jlrat pluerniti, Ma serveveet Prin Wer Leck 4uxk Crack eK Lhcas: Mh iae wees ro Ee Le ae ae cu: fee Col» tothe fit =p r [reper d Oli~ 22220 <j Aerefilev A Aegecth tthe far pie 22 caeteiferete uw ip da Affe 2eclec+tt | 7g Sal Jax eee Gx perceveed (5 pete -<., | | lon Cet aces, Coun c lez’ (gata e deck! P| of hev lv Cle-lclréec~— i pitied, A tives) ' P| Murgleler Pilea a A creer 7 oth é gh "fea Uehd A Attn ao Crt ty /tez Cecen. Ztte places < OP Nene ck Li leeuu Cec c Cee € 2etu acfgcrel, x levy Zetestct L272) ZuteFn 4 ; CHK, - zrel Ge { (#LCCE2ZZzA tcocQ B2ttv~ £te (hme _ Yvy We cea Plier fife : 44 Sf g Lheut Jb ati ff : PECL LOE ZL cet totlecl barck et- Cfecer es fev kK brfffacceced | FZ er 22ceou 4 cOowN Zi rE a CLt2t« t ? - y \ fi4of-< Cf Meer A. Jerk ZéewJitlercecrt~er€ yr , 2 , , Oo ane f Zier AetK Cetecc€. ct)|ezn LZezr b4¢tG6ert Ad blige liad Aerie’ At. — e | Z Paw We t22lbn. | er Jase I eanieeni [ihe (4 tere heb bg heer Cacve Heser heer -o Ml |), Corer ene ck Lhietr1< Che C Cote € | ot efecret« cK ee | CCK, nee 4 Arecaateck, peeps fs Ltn pacity Aptteg Lecet-2 ect letlece tart Let Grrrl D bev, a brffr ccd | | ataseer~4, frrees Wh. Farce. dena | fevitfert; “L Le fer Src CeecF ecere€ a Seffrerw he. CEL ActL A212 loey hs batt Az¢t Cae Lad Zeew A. fierG . AL FV EL-CEECL D “f- Seetp er, Corel C7 tipi<22teect CAL Lows lap eile P ie Olen. teethtuctaths Z rah j tester Cle OCC SM 4 ZLeat Bie~ oan Le“ Ce. frm PLB ee rps Lo Lter LIP Re OS le fez Hh bey 4 4 Mee tee tee fet her acfpiert SAR nay Kfeer c J fut c Urnreess fh wJ tw Lied Ae Cote Lonel Cgesa Sota Zi a Dan ae a ee a Ott dN hted pv IlaeatL7 t y a Maruti ff speantee te. athe. Cleat ees feet] pot fort ave ik: ite atk, Arntfiliceret : a21e Gores VS) Zen aaett af bees Aneocleeet.b Lewtafe ry Att thes. La1e’ Ceretfelcece et 47 220 227-42 Ctat ape en te ttt ¢tteF s tt Ge < fue lek _t4~ Cul CH Le A o - ‘ ccc. I. A221 LL” Lm Eo ee ae ; sspeerten . Sfp Me Bae Pe ence BR fer Cher artaticth. acte~ Lecuh Fle C1 AA Lele - tren monn iy ples ee Finn foe ge ees geen (C205 Zeer, J oS yom . Wz kK ‘ Q .* BB = cl6l Vs. er North Carolina, j wr 4 Im the superior court. Irecell County. { we Mamie Grier Affidavit. ' ee Frank W.Grier. J.W.Van Hoy being duly sworn depeses anf says that in the above enti- tle@ action now pending in the superier court of Iredell County,the sher- ir? ef said county has returned the summons issued to him in said action endorsed,''iot to be found in my county,after due diligence and enquiry’ ’ and said te be out of the state'',that the defendant therein caunot after due diligence be found in the State;that said defendant is a proper party to said action,which is an action brought by Memie Grier,plaintiff,against Frank W.Grier,defendant. Wherefore the plaintiff praymw that an order be made by the court that service of summons be made on the defenflant by publication in some news paper published in Irecell Jounty,Nerth Jare —-— KD 4 b gee OR tay fine e: Atliamt. jf 7 Thisz / day of 1911. superior court,iredei. Cq. ‘IOLID ‘A Yuesy ‘19 W ‘SA ome Cl6I de + “ ( a Ao T Rise fe 4 6% ek % ii . Bo 't- a aR Poe ao we a see ae DIL Sind a4 ae é - v : sv, «+ BMaGu * Og me ‘ > away Le ey Llecer] rT Meteo! . w maby Ase telte ofmel Dbige te x% + , j bans ohn “0 a BB 2: CI6I North Jarelina, In the superior ceurt. Iredell County SY a0tel Laces | a 4D It appearing from the a®fidavit of J.W.Van Hey im this action that ee - . de / Va ye »the defendant therein is not to be found in ( Oréér e® publication ef sumcns. eS = Iredell Vounty,and canmot after due diligence be feumd in the State, and it further appearing that a summons has been issued to the sheriff ef Iredell county commanding him te summon the defendant abeve named te appear im said actien,and that said summons has been returned Marked''Net to be found in my county'',and that said defendant is net to be feumd by due diligence and enquiry in the State,and that said defendant is a necessary party te said action:”- It is therefere etait that metice of this actien be published in The Statesville Sentinel,a mews paper published in Iredell county,for Teur weeks,settim feurin the title or tne action,the purpose ef the same, and requiring the defendant te appear at the term of the superier court ef Iredell, ,ceunty,te pe held om the } ouaulighace He a 19ll,at An the court heuse in said ceunty,and amswer er demur to the cemplaint of the plaintiff Clerk ef the superier court, ThisZ/ day of Wt-tpy91}. = REA TERRIA Ieee Me NETRA Dart Me Bi sess acaiboesahaa atone Rca aaa he anerseatdininnied naan re , : 0 ak 1p ARNO REE om Oo oO we Pry a B. 3 ye = @ . ’ ; rime enc 3 o~ Ss a c mesa me Oo $ ree ) — ¥ No . K % ‘ 4 é or a a , . i L¢@ 2 ‘ 4 [ROL bv ¢ ‘ ‘ \ J Fy . . . x . e i : ‘ - : . e . i, | , . ! yee F 5 “M YueLy “ILI "SA STUTePy “TOL ID cl6l In The Superior Ceurt, As of Nerth Qarolina, Iredell County. May Term.1911. Mamie Grier : Vs. COMPLAINT. Frank W.Grier. me The plaintiff? complaining of the defendant alleges: FIRST. That on or about the 4th day of May,1904,she and the defendant intermar- ried according to the laws of JG \\00 +1 Carolina,and thet they >? lived together as man and wife for a psriod of about three years, 3econd, 1 That on or about the first day of May,1907,the defendant abandoned her of part,and has lived separaie 3 own.accord and without any cause on her nd apart from her since that time;that the Dlaintifz has been a resident of this state Ter mote than two years pregeding the bringing of — Lerel the plaintizs prays that tug court of divorce a nensa et there from the said cet ee er the the costs of this action according to “the law. Or PuialAtiisL % Worth Jarolina, AUP 2 LT Dea Vi F.. Iredell County. ae FE = 5 Mamie M.Grier clot Vs. Frank W. Grier. } The Plaintiff,Mamie M.Grier,being duly sworn deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true of her own knowledge,except those matters stated therein on information and belief and as to those she believes it to be. tmue;That the said com- plaint is not made out of collusion between her and her said husband but in sincerity and truth for the causes alleged in the complaint; that 3 s mere . P gaia complaint is not made for ae purpose of being rveed irom eaca other;that sae has been a resident of tais ovaye for more than two years “ior to the filing of this complaint;and that the facts as alleged in ~ Dp to her knowledge the foregoing complaint nave eo daar ic YOY a than gix months prior to the filing of this complaint. 1 xy ; iiscas We dy Yb tere | Plainit 3 the Oey af July,ivil 3worm to and subscribed jie... LM g Ko head Life 3 Superior + ourt. Qa rR y ‘ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ‘M YUeL “Iotin “SA OTURYy “IolID © State of NorthCarolina. To the Sheet ot \VAebeltl- County-~-GREETING : yer Comisanded to‘guinmon. cvecsbonseesscccepese see covebeeebocgconsseneeiensses! *ORpensese ae SeCeennees $00 seneceser seperoneoronesnecorebesoresenmnonencoeossesosesone ones seseen ses sceseee 7 the defendant ...above named, whee be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of | oy" i our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the Ggunty of A £.....at the Court “bh, ....Monday of i Z7°2=4-54L~ L444. Gon the... 11 “Wciiily after the... / LLY. .19@//, and answer the complaint, a copy of Court for said County, within the first thrée they fail to answer to the said’ complaint the same! being ‘the [2-2— day of which will be dépdsited in the office of the Clerk of the Superi days of said Term, and let said Defendant stake notice if. 7 Within, that time, the plaintiff....will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Niagebd rope Te a vior Court ‘Sot AL Ld LL oonty. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. ue. day of Clerk of Su HSE 9 18! he \ -- OR BuUlL-~-, FAIS A AQT’ evoMnNUs co as . © 4 Y, ‘ f Yao sors YOM BAL WX, « ‘WANG 7 Pat ‘M YURL “Ion ‘SA STUB “JoLID) Cl6lI é ‘i <r paarsoay Pe $-2i3 jo ~~ aBea[tW “JO yinod s0edng.< #4 ¢ ont 731779 801 SHOWN LSNIVOV “7 v oe a “yr 61 wai yg a(qeminyay Go apr soe “AsuIONY SyyAelg ie pe esecsceceg conpenecccepeedinccongmvactapeowsvvdebencsisechsesus sroereerenain Orr erence Ap nnn SET, BUT BIOJEq PequIosqns pue 0} UIOMS *suoT}]Ndex9 wioIj ydutexe Aj1edoid pue sarjtiqet] ‘s}qap siy aAoqe pue 132A0 SIB[[Op posJpuny O43 JO UINs 94} qWIOM st aq Shes UIOMS BuIaq™ (‘Te9g) ~ CMTS? OR aT : jo Asp “SIq} ‘speas pue spuey Ino sseuyiy ‘M01}98 SIq} ur “Harel g 24} Jo 1aA00e1 Avu~" QUBpAezeG >q} SB S09 qens [[e > aepuejeg, 2} 4ed [eqs rs { Wat, 134 ~~ FHA 9y3 it ‘RAIMOY ‘prea aq 0} ‘saeyoq"~ who snnenepeegenpee-eneanedebnnspessnpecashas wovee ° esbepese “STO wns ayy ut ‘no1jo8 siqy ur oneogens juepuayeq oui LSNIVOV f ‘Ayunod ‘yunogd soedng 34} uy { “¥NISIONYOD HLNON AO SALY¥LS Grier; Mamie vs. Grier, Frank W. 1912 Q =. @ o? ory = 2 2 > Cl6l W “915 ‘SA OTe ©.4) a Oo Oo oo — z= > 3 oO =. Y cl6l enti aon Rei ape ee Oo a, Oo Oo 7 a 7 as eS. oa = Cl6l stints , 1911. This 2ist day of Hoy, Weatherman & Van Athy . Q is @ . ee = 2 3 oe = ec has oO -* bo) = = << wi l6l c NOTICE OF SUMMONS. | North Cardlina | Inthe Superior Iredell County | Court. - said complaint. - J. A: Hartness, Clerk Superior Court. This 2ist day of 1911. Weatherman & Van Hoy, Att’ys ‘M URL “IotIH W “31D “SA oTlue C16! ORES ES ek, a NerthCarelina, Iredell Ceunty Statesville Jentinel,a news a.3.Alexauder,publisher ef the aad jtate aferesaid,being duly swern de- paper published in Iredell Jeunty peses and says that the annexed - etice ef summens in the actieu entitled published ix tue aferesaid uews papsr fer ACh 1911. Publisher Mamie grier Va.Frauk W.Grier,was feur weeks beginming With the issue dated A3 day er cs Ca . Us Ca cree LL LO, ee : isan Grier, Mamie vs. Grier, Frank W. 1912 M uel “o1IH ‘SA OTR] “IoD eee Cl6I Seec.Z, Rete 8 é Grier, Mamie vs. Grier, Frank W. 1912 AA YURI “Jatin ‘SA OTe “Jat CI6I North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1912. Mamie Grier vs Judgment Frank Grier This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before His Honor, G. S. Ferguson, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the January Term of the Supertor Court of Iredell county, ana the jury naving answered the issues submitted to them 48 appears in the recora ana it appearing by the verdict of said jury that the defendant abandoned the piaintitf in the year 1907 ana has iivea separate and apart from said plaintitf since ghat time all without any cause on the part of the plaintiff; It is therefore considerea and aajuaged by the court that the pasintiff be granted a divorce a mensa et thoro from the saia defendant ana the ponds of matrimony herefofore existing between the plaintiff ana the aefenaant ve ana tne Same are nereby uissolvea to that extent. It is further considerea, aajuagea and aecreéd that the custody of Gecil Grier the only issue of saia marriage be ana the same is neredy awaraea to the plaintiff, Mamie Judge Presiaing. Grier, Mamie vs. Grier, Frank W. 1912 ta tm *p eoer0yq *uoqduey Aronk, Coratuin DB da VWifesrnisre Gerk. Ge eute Cound { Ve TTY Morac 9. Macuplim Cub, Me obo iiyy, eomplarine of Ln diffe cauh 4 aly L Shek shank fo7 t merncage wad CouGaciac ant hut salunait laolsscece Aertel a—at Mae hilt hack Moraes L.A riufelim Cal. of Caine d Mnlh<g . Digs, gy gg ee aes ae ee bhp tard cbifrea~, hate Lente hn hfe haute, ax | pa Aft of hie treeray ewe Kas fa panes” | hue risnelined tar Cn wiboley atte ah Ceoran. | Sin eee tees Ky Slottnig fer fisrrom a. | ditene Lense — On Gugry md nats Cecrs Oercecasy , ae ty offs G Creny a froretiin Oh mn Ah ainfiy/ a? ty de uae of | er eth Renee 4 ay aunick Lyn | hile winpcadicns usa, tar. ¢ » fre blee;| ot Some & ein leg mele Ffaa8 anh. frne - <4u Afi claw ah ererg Cinre Cofere oe es $ Caz olin , sefartincy ila, cashes nif brn f <p, pe Se ahh hurlrnsnhk Geet Crtrsbbts C004e -” other ff ty ba fiteiwgig or -GHLobGhk,. (a Geet). deoveory Me Rtenee timer 2 Folaa *o ae parent gp Hm hbo ff Capita s GIL poten DA Mis: Aint koe wanted <s elbs Gch tea (“ orn eaorgang Ahan Merete ag a 4 ole. Aone moa cho Zz Beer om and pani u'ncaped Geen agit ote 3 Over’ Ca Ae t Rt Aten 7 Uh ok ain don wens + alias Stee Porn oon fp Mais fin Bicatnn dae th make for a caters qe susest Codsssen einaiit:iasas as dhafferedonets ound goromnetnieg ( Aor ofarsunaey rote of tre > prpeceate of hag Crom aanet leis howto rk nond htseday hain Content, aud fr brwets aetaar 0 froovetier remhier lar prerreetce we thin holies ead or « strictest ya Haw, towes Nase Rey were oe we fartelerney tog obe, Olas ¢ Ctcatesmall. cme amr jerry “ a. & R thing d Hi, Ulan fy Fil Han ptawiity Por leasing ashy tern Ony ile Mok He foe aot forvle te than Casale + are bre fe Maw haot of Des Kav hrwreoryn > hathay ) Hod hav bornuprlint th verdadero howl’ ow Oy Mahtevanen Fotertine fnrrarg! onnd ohne Merete, tue for Mam ture Jerrfirrm tie a ioe tnenehe eenae heh. Mthre ete 2 = Actes Boe wach hea 7 4 pr hlim 4a ~ - £2 | Zo “a ? 4 ihe Vf | romerny ef po 7opreg Axcetsd G eae. ae Fe ~opoe py fr by Pe ~~ i yy hs 4 NRE S206 a ee Caccu® A Calekeg Seen ll ae eee pty cel Clhrer ped 4 $reeck, Aan Cufasrecn eo Seger Gens eZ ahs aevauths ufoen hen aserte Cag Cele? ae ar Berens Gostil, Lauea ge, aug aslinth, td Arce ca per Kor , J dhot- Th. hav rakiiig m~ ahs SZ encelz. oi cfth~ 4er~ chore cna Ae axcig Ly Lex Aacale, get fe ofp omg , a POCO Ki ae Ge cones ti dacfooerd & te Oe ud othe Co OK LaLa. Goo ; ede eae ' bz ath th tth )VAOCH?, Li \ ere se Liac Sher f heb to M0 fijiyph) OA) fl “Mak ha. (0b eR Tote ee eaplacch ane Cree b Glia lack ie ee frcaatidy ard bli lata. clits clas Cah Cucuplacith td nok rade ah of, [Cnt ar br ly tallececa. Ceclssr. Achat ¢ , Mike. on for He ea. fexrfrce of Creep ; dana h~ Alaee FOr OAT ae ae see aia coe frewcea Putt L ofiaue frecwteslye 2h- Lenzi eric eee Re heer Hn feterip . G a; lahesieh tt ) Ven? S Arve ge Vauhllerd Ge; Ve AL. oc Mii 6) Gel ~« E <0 co ° s s @ ° ® qa < a E o ° ae uuy be Mer sted: Ma filr : | | | a f Sptut-, BFL, oF Minutes 2 phe Coltaute C., A.C, — vf crite Se a (reve frrctents Che” Bn tree ff Aur Horyg,! ae eae eee oe dany ee ey ng - 8 s vw ¢ g co ° ® qa pote'ee OG fee Cofoy Lo PPS Lee a Sx: Low costed 4 ee Be | a nae oe Set Jot Ch ite: is ay i Ca BB to 7 i | * « ee et Hampton, Ann vs. * Hampton, Horace J. Poe ae | Ct.. Baer. _ 4 ¥&, > Hie Veeweccfeleie Car. Off | eoeioy ‘uo zduey *SA uuy ‘uo zdurey = Hampton, Ann vs. Hampton, Horace J. SIpue) “yooourzy ‘SAY “q “Yooourpy LI6I et ay Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for iale by Brady, The Primes, © pikamdite: N.C. 2M—5—, med : STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Cee nty--GREETING: , | 7 1 Y pon are hereby Commanded to Summon Plaintiff... an _ And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. Defendent...... i he css eteeeterentatneaninint Nea , Clerk of our said Court, at office in Monday after the... Monday in ..Plainti ....Defendant ..... : i : Tget ms ; eS ; : ; i go ee. Hancock, P. R. vs. Hancock, Candis 1917 SIpue> “yooourzy ‘SAU 'd “‘yooouepy LI6I Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, | County--GREETING: ae OF Fo tes iY To THE SHERIFF OF YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON r Jugge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county Defendant.........._ And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, SIpue> “yooouryy ‘SA "Yl “d “Yooouepy LI6I | No 2 - 3 j 4 \ 4 Against ” bude isbn —-<Pelated aad for ante by Béedy, he Printer Bulag. Gk aie gata / | STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA i To THE SHERIFF OF... County--GREETING: i - sipuea “yooouryy SA "YU ‘d “‘yoooueyy LI6I Wou are Bereby Commanded to Summon.. personally to appear before the Court House jin. , on heed o SA... ee : next, then and there in a certain controve eenvecdopacenancenccesencunsncnsetegesonsecsvesasneeen! ~ ‘Plaintiff Defendent....... And this you shall in no wise omit, under the pen rescribed by law. Witness , Clerk of our said Court, at office in X 4 sIpued “yooourpy ‘SAY “g “yooouryy LI6l Cc : ; st $ ° ; - > t “ TS eee ——— j : aacnennnneee : ey Wee Si it I aiimapenmeenememenen nnn. ee | FT seeenagnaternseeens ‘ \ Yl ctrrved Pn foruid Lb 4c / Si ye Pid shen i SIPUeD “yooourz] SA "Y “d “Yoooueyy LI6I Err ne za ee EE TN ee TTT TETRA — is civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, ‘eisatiote, N.C. te. —_—— SS es i ‘ ' e* An TQ THE SHERIFF OF... Wou are Hereby Commanded to Summon personally to appear before the the Court House_in.... »aA< ¥. on oe pl fran , LAME ot bm Cae B98 pe coca aes bea Ki » next,-then.and there tot y and t truth to say in behalf of...../. ih cis Mstopanstncatcgt EMME AB - e ¥ « 6 in a certain controversy, id Court de nding, and then and a Defendent..... And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. , Clerk of our said Court, at office inj Whitness ..........------- eo atk Fee a saps ll giana aE sIpueD “ydoouerz] "SA "YE 7 “yooouepy LI6l «Plain - ase 4 th artenenecs tthe. ree, Eg 4 ; i " h Me Btu fS > 174A Io, et i FO e Gy ff ; r LA i / / hip ail = 7 ‘ —_— 4 , i x t a ; aa la uf F “Z A SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. County.-- Inthe Superior Court, AGAINS _ \ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. é ale Dou are Berebp Comiianded to summon oo AA > = g 3 Cl6l * (ong : the defendant... above named, if be found within your Sree to be and appear before the per of ; our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of at the or House j fis S427q Lon’ the!) c mene Bee e Zz eof a the’ sine’ being“ the mi day of : EES AGE °F ate ‘answer the complaint, A copy of which willt be deposited in the office of th Superior Cotitt fir'said @omityy within the fitst:thres days of, saigs erm; aud let said. Defendant take notice if they fait'to answer to ‘the, ipaid complaint Withip that time, the plaintiff... » will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint, Hereof fail not, and of this Summons make due return. , , at Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this../. ZZ t kon ‘ L771 7% Peatsooy ’ y ) Fi nh 9} aIquaINnjey ‘131739 HOd SNOWWNS TE? ~ a oneness eseen = fee iFtF HR "OT auarnecenrasrerstrenorebersioanerewewen ni pian Joyiadng aq} jo *> aay o>? > “Aau1oyyy $.gNae]g EGA raT ID. ST IP ITD Re ceeSouvovcossebebtremorsorsebosccccercocenreesereereeoessoreeesosee Serene - ISNIVOV i. eal. of AS aK felt pls Ae > =z J a 8 re r 4 cl6l “oon QUE BIOjeq paquosqns pue 0] DIOMSG *suOTynexe w03j }duiexe Ajsodoid pur saijipiqei] ‘syqep sIy sA0qe pue 13A0 SI¥]JOP pepuny om} Jo uns 9g} qyOM st aq Shes UIOMS Bulaq™ yUBpaayeaq 24} s¥ 3s00 yons {ye BIEL ay Jf FeAamoy ‘pIOA aq 03 ‘sIET]O LSNIVOV “Ayano ~ *ynod soedng 94) U] \ *¥NITIONVYD HLYON AO SLYLS North “arolina, - In Superior Court: tredell County: Aug. TREM.I9Ig. . Martha Hgart COMPLAINT. Vs. Amos Hart. The Plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges: FIRST. That on or about ----day of Oct. ,1906,at “tatesville,I.c., the plaintiff and defendant were married and lived together as man and wife until the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in Oct:, i908. SECOND. That én or about Oct.,Ist.,I908 the defendant,without any cause or reason whatever,and without any fault on the part of the plaintiff,left his home and ae the plaintiff and took up : x with another woman by the name of Revils with whom said defend- bat be A > = 55 “ B and has ever since and is now living in the unholy and un-lawful cl6l relation of FORNICATION AND ADULTRY,thus totally disregarding the soleminity of the marriage vow. THIRD.That the plaintiff has not received the defendant in ecun- ee embraces since her knowledge of his conduct and since he adandoned her as above stated. FOURTH. That the plaintiff has been e boni fide resident of the state of Ii.C. for more than two yewrs next preceeding the commen- cexent of this action. FIFTH.That the facts set forth and contained herein as a complaint have existed,to the knowledge of the plaintiff,for more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action. “herefore the plaintiff demands judgement that she be an absolute divorce from the bonds of matriviony with the Tl Martha hart being duly sworn, deposes and says that the facts set fo— rth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of her knowl- edge and belief,and that the complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between her self and the defendant,and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other ,but in Sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint. The facts set forth in said complaint as grounds for divoree,have exsisted,to affiants knowledge,for more than six months priog to the filing of this complaint and that the plaintiff has been a boni “ide resident of the “tate of N.C.for more than two years prior to the nf of the complaint. Sworn to and subscribed to before me this June,+912 jeomee AS >< BS cl6l soury “Wey ‘SA BYYRYY We cl6l North Yarolina, In the Superior Court’ Tredell County: Aug .Term.+9Ig2. Martha “eart Vs. ORDER OF PUBLICATION. Anos 4erat- 1 I 1 J I J +t appearing from the affidavit ot Licthldad Len 1, this action hat Amos “eart,defendant therein,is not to be found in +redelil County, and cannot after due diligence be found in the ®tate,and it further app- earing that said action is an action against said defendant for DIVORCE; “tis therefore orderedthat wétidd ‘ofthese ae tion Pe Sul tished (And that said plaintiff has a good cause of action against the said defendant, and it further appearing that the said defendant has departed the State and that his whereabouts is not known to the plaintiff,-t is therefore orésred by the Court that notive of this action be advertised in the “ews paper pu blished In Iredell VYounty,for four successivs weeks,setting forth the tittle of the action,with a brief and plain statement of the cause and subject matter of the action and the subject matter thereof,and reqthiring the defendant to appear at the next term of tredell Superior Court,to be held on the FIFTH MUNDAY before the FIRST IN SEPT. ,THE SAME BEING THE 29th.Day of July,191I2.,and answer or demur to the Complaint of said nlaintiff. This 12th.Day of “une,I9Il2- mle ly ap >= g 3 C161 Nerth Carolina, In th “uperior Court. Iredeli County. Aug. Term. ,49I2- or Ch fete yee a Li a Va. & 4 fee 8 evcvee Y fruklebe : Amos Jeart- ' a sili Hees sae ea duly swern,deposes and says:that in the above entitled action nov pending in the Superior Court of “redell County,the Sherriff of said County hes returned the Summons issued to him in said action endorsed "Amos Heart, defendaht not to be found in +redell County"":That the defendant therein cannot after due dili- gence be found within the (tate;that said defendant ic e proper perty to said astion,being théedefendant therein which is an action for DIVORCE On the part of Martha Heart against said amos “eart,her husband, féffon the grounds of FORNICATION AND ADU TRY;wherefore the said plaintiff praye thet an order may be meade by the Court that service of Summons be made on said defendant by publication in some news peper published in /reés1i Younby,3.C. Dated this -“.-</A<asy of Yune, 1912, MAM LUttdee. Jf ¢ Hart, Martha vs. Hart, Amos 1912 wn > : ° ° = 2 ° = ® 3 a Repeated Intentionally Hart, Martha vs. Hart, Amos 1912 on = S 5 o So | 2 © a a @® nl Repeated Intentionally Hart, Martha vs. Hart, Amos 1912 on = S = o So A 2 © = a ® poe Repeated Intentionally Hart, Martha vs. Hart, Amos 1912 Repeated Intentionally o na > S o 5 = © ° = @ S zi @ cu ® a. | i Z. ¥. Long. au Jame l4, 1912. i a ag Hart, Martha vs. Hart, Amos 1912 ‘ In the ®uperior Court* Tredel1 ounty: Aug.*em.lgre* Marthe Heart Vs. Affidavit of The Prinéer: Amos Heart * o R.R.Clark,£ditor of the Landmark, being duly sworn deposes and says; That the notice herewith attached of “ublication of Summons in the Case of “artha Heart VS.Amos Heart was published and appeared in the ~“andmerk for tour successive weeks, beginning onl doy of pfress--r912, and endinga%--day ofeelig, ot2. KE his July 28th. ,I9I2° ff #2 C atk @, . North Carolina, In th *uperior Court. Iredell County. Aug, Term. 491245 | Martha Heart Vs. Amos Heart. j Se IE iii Loe ry the: Macs duly sworn,deposes and says:that in the above entitled action now pending in the Superior Yourt of +redell County,the Sherriff of said County has returned the Summons issued to him in said action endorsed ""Amos Heart,defendaht not to be found - in +redell County"":That the defendant therein cannot after due dili- gence be found within the _tate; That said defendant is a proper party to said action,being &hdedefendant therein which is an action for DIVORCE On the part of Martha Heart agaimst said Amos “eart,her husband, fo#yon the grounds of FORNICATION AND ADULTRY;wherefore the Said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of Summons be made on said defendant by publication in some sOoury “yey ‘SA BYR eH news paper published in +redell Younty,l.c. CI6l Dated this te day of Yune,I9I2, ve x Ce EN ee PE ee eae ‘ eee ee RTE TRE ST RMP REE TE Pearman ar — oi In the Superior Court, North Carolina, | Iredell Sounty* J Feb. ,Term.lol3. 1 Marthe Hart Bris VS.# j Issues: Amos Heart‘ 4 I. Was the plaintiff and defendant intermarried as alleged in the Answer ve “Ss Did the defendant desert and abandon the plaintiff and commit fornication and adultry as eallegded in the spunlainy Orme lve ° # : j ns answer, ee ] complaint ) Re soury "WeH ‘SA BYR] “eH cl6l ie ctnsslelcanesnlllseesk a 7s gitites 2 IR ae f a er : % SN & é Hart, Martha vs. Hart, Amos 1912 soury “yey ‘SA BYLBYY “eH cl6l North Yarolins, In the superior Yourt/ Iredell County. Feb. term,{913- Martha Heart Vs. P. Judgment. Amos Heart. ) This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, §efor6 his Honor, Harry W.Whedbee, udge,and the jury,and the jury having answered all the issues submitted to them by the Court,and which are made a part of the record in this cause,in favor of the plain- tiff and against the defendant; It is therefore,ordered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant be disloved and that the plaintiff,Martha Heart,be granted an “bs-- Amos Heart- Judge “residing: Hart, Martha vs. Hart, Amos 1912 A or ale Fi ere fie I” i L Lt ea a nt a in <i a ee ia oe. i ey d Ny D. E. i SN eile eA, 7 i TTS eR ai ta nis tS yi ee as ee LL, AvP Prt claee LF-xz ‘2 eectiay: “~* e Se, C2zec Y a Za 2 —Z } in pon at EE * Pag se ea Cr122K thas aAS3e ‘Uosqoy ‘SA YaqTy ‘uosqoyy 6l6I SUMMONS FOR RELIEF .—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N, C. 3-1§- 13-1M. County--$n the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. .% State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of the defendant .. above nained, if Phe be found within your C uty, to be and appear before the Judge of oy S ; Court, at a Court to be eo Cannty of... Bivintpiae at the Court ae SEZ, zl on the... J7.* Monday after the. Z Monday of Jbi2r the same being the fi day of i 191.4 and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Siti for said County, within the first three €.tex fail to answer to the said complaint days of said“Ferm, and let said Defendant take notice if within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this sumnions make due return. ‘ ; & Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 2d day of G)7a2ch S nF Clerk of Superior Court Ace. County. 6161 assey ‘uosqozy ‘SA YoqTy “‘Wosqoxy : “paareg , “O03 e[QeuInjoy ie eset ;ZJ0 yN0D IOWedng ayi jo LSNIVOV meg: ‘JaITIN YOU SNOWWAS ‘UNO pe ; a =. S o uo. a] an > od oa o * Ss o Pd ‘tie ir jo Aep” S14} SUI a10Jaq paquiosqns pue 0} MI0MG ‘suolndaxa wry ydutaxa Ayiadoid pur saiqtiqety ‘syqap sty aaoge pue 1940 Ss¥[[Op paipuny OM} Jo MINS 34) YOM st aq Shes BIOMS SuI—aq (189g) ({B9g) (Bg) 161 -q-Vv jo Aep SIq} ‘sjvas pue spuey ino ssaujzI Ay “HO!jO8 SI} Ur~ HHUUUeL[_J 2} JO 1aa0001 Aewt JUBPUIJeq I} SB ysoo yons [[e & Wepoajeg 243 Aed jjeqs ar YUUare[g ay) jt ‘waAamoy *‘pIOA aq 03 ‘si¥[jog “JO INS 24) Ot ‘MoOTjDe stq] ut jUepnsjaq aq} | ‘ONOSe . LSNIVOV ‘anO| sJoadng aq) uy 074N puNnog Sadjasino a3pa;mouyAoV aM (‘Ayunoy \“¥NITION¥O HLYON 4O AL¥LS <3 North Carolina Superior Court Tredell County | May Term 1919 assey Uosqoy ‘SA Heqry ‘Uosqopy] 6161 Albert Hobson, plaintifr?. : Ve Complaint. { Magrie Hobson, Defendant. The pleintiff complains and says: First-- That he and the defendant married about -fourteen years ago and lived together as husband and wife until about eight years ago when the defendant, without any cause ,left the plaintiff ana has not lived with him since. Second--That, as plaintif? ig informed and beleives, and alleges,the defendant committed atutiess with a party unknown to him and whose name he has not been able to obtain. Third-- That the facts set froth herein as erounds for a divorce have existed to the knowledge of plaintiff for more than mix months prior to the filing of this Complaint Fourth-- That plaintiff has been a citizen and resident of the State of North Carolina for many years. Wherefore plaintiff? prays judgment; That the bonds of matrimony evisting between himself and the defen- dant be dissolved; that he be free and discharged from any and all liability because of the acts and things done by the defendant Chidecay RA0cee_.. Counsel for Plaintiff. Albert Hobson being sworn says that the Plaint are true » and separated from each other but in mentioned in the Complaint; that the facts set forth in the Complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to his knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of the Complaint and that he has been a resident of the State for more than two years next preceeiing to the filing of the Complai nt. Sworn to and subscribed this/o day ot Che a1dsey ‘Uosqgozy ‘SA WoqTy UosqoH 616! North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County May Term 1919 Albery Hobson, plaintiff. { Vs | Affidavit. Maggie Hobsom, defendant. Albert Hobson, plaintir: being duly sworn says, that the defendant Mageie Hebson cannot after due diligence be found wiyhin the State of North Carolina; that plaintiff has a good Cause of action against her,mamely an action for divorce upon Statutory grounds; that the defendant departed from the State Some yeurs ego and keeps herself without the State for the purpose of avoiding the service of Summons that the Summons in said action was Senued on the 10th day of Mareh 1919 by the Clerk of the Court of said County and the Sherif? has made his return, "Not to be found within Iredell County" Wherefore plaintiff prays the Court for an order of publication notifying the defendant to appear at the May Term 1919- Sworn to and subscribed before me*this the 10th day of March 1919 Mh eat tetsor ~s.. |, Clerk Supervise Court. Worth Carolina ; Superior Ceurt Tredell County May Term 1919 Asse Uosqoqy SA Hoqry “Uosqopy] Albert Eobson, Plaintiff. 6161 ve Caer of publication. v a i $ § : Maggie Hobson, defendant Upom the reading of the affidavit of the plaintirr it appears to the Court that he has a g00d cause of action against the defendant; that the d-fendamt has departed the State and keeps herself absent; that the-Sheriff has made return that defendant cannot after due diligence be found within the County; It is therefore rodered by the Court that publieation for six weeks be made in the Sentinel , amwespaper published in Iredell County requiring the defendant to appear at the May Term of the Court and answer or demur to the complaint, a copy of whieh will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Court. Clex of the COurt Hobson, Albert vs. Hobson, Maggie —_ 1919 aAS3eW Uosqoy ‘SA Hogry “Uosqgop 6161 Statesville, N. C,__May 25919 gy M ee of Cow+t,—Ivedeii County 4-4 falduell Atty, Divorce Procesings THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL CO., Inc. Semi-Weekly PUBLISHED MO AYS AND. THURSDAYS Circulates Among the Best People Of Iredell And Adjoining Counties (An ad in The Sentinel is an investment—Not a speculation.) __AMOUNT OF SPACE USED ANDOATE Bie i 7 6| 9 | 10] n| 19] 13] 14! 15! 16 17 ) Div oxce| pro de aii Ings \ REMARKS Asse ‘Uosgoyy ‘SA HOqTy “‘Uosqoy] 616! a1d3eYy ‘Uosqoyy ‘SA Yaqry ‘uosqoyy 616! North Carolina . Superior Court: Iredell County : ‘May Term 1919 Albert Hobson, plaintiff { Ve Judgment. Mageie Hobson, defendant. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court and being heard before His. Honor, Harding , Judge and a Jury and the Jury having found all the issues in favor of the plaintiff; It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Ceurt that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are ereby) dissolved. Albert Hobson Ve Maggie Hobson Hobson, Albert vs. Hobson, Maggie o Bill of Costs—Civil—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Co., Statesville, N. C. [tamer there” MRR ME patgg a OP HT No. Docket | Every copy of We ein ar 25]. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. Aiosal oie fee. | Appeal from Clerk to Judge. County. Order for enlarging time of pleading Asse ‘Uosqoy ‘SA OqTy ‘Wosqoy — ——— | Interlocutory Orders. ‘a WA ttachment, Order in | | Mere flak 616I Injunction Orde-, including Bond and Justification . . Order of Arrest Against f er Notice.. Notice, for each name over one in same paper Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided. Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk... . . Judgment jn favor of Widow's Year's Support J : Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Transcript of Judgement. Execution 4 Sherriff's Return . . Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal . Transcript to Supreme Court. . . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when jury impaneled . . Referee's Allowance sg ey onstable. Magistrate Plaintiff's Witnesses ed ce CIVIL DOCKET. BL OF cst ateoD to 1a S-CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) Against livi®> : i . Wada Wahisn Hobson, Albert vs. Hobson, Maggie 1919 uOosIeD “URWI]O} ‘SA SITES “UPWTOH £061 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF—Judge.—Printed and for sale at Mascot Printing Co., Statesville, N. C. Prot th County.--In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. To the Sheriff of County —GREETING ; You are hereby Commanded to summon __. Capit i Mee Aid 7 si the Defendant above named, if. /L4,._.be found within your County, to be and appear before the s Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of. ) Le Aslk _ t the Court House in thai. tas on the a pA2% naa her (bd Monday of 47 Ne the same being the_2 7 ye day of __} a and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superio# Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant...... take notice if i Sail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff...... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this mH day of be i Clerk Superior Court of ll is ley in ti y by 8 a1qvuanjay "ohne iD 4 or 4 ap Png doygadns 243 fo ” fo 74n07 wung ng ‘JY 104 suo a CIO * CO6T “wday EF IG/ WS ‘hausony s. {rum fo hop S14} au adofag pagiaasqns pup 02 usomg “suoqgnoexe mods yduaxe Aysodoad puv sarzriqniy ‘syqap sty enogn pun 4ano $4Djjop peapuny omy fo wns ay} yj4om st ay shvs uaoms Butag ha (‘qoasy ("7paS) (*qpas) 061A ‘*¥ fo fiop $14) ‘s]D28 puny Spuvy ino ssauz1y “uonjon siy) ur Jigurmyy ayy fo 49n0004 Row quo ~puafoq 94} 8p 809 yons y~o ** gutpuafeg ey; find ijpys Suyuorg aug ft ‘4anamoy ‘ptoa aq 03 ‘sanqjoq 0 wins ay} Ut “uotzOD sty} ut yuDpuafeg ey} wld, ojun punog sanjasano abpajmouyon a4 ‘INOdU jsurpbo § ‘figunoy "JAN0D 401h0dNg AY) U7 (‘VNITOUNVD H.LYON AO ALV.LS uOsIeD “UPW]OH] ‘SA OITJeS ‘UeWOH £061 uOosIe> “UBW]OH] ‘SA SITTeS “UeWOH £061 SUIMONS FOR RELIEF—Judge,—Printed and for sale ih Mascot Printing Co., Statesville, N. C. Soo SSeS a County.--In the Superior Court, Ye SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of i Xmededa7 Soares SA te Rl eS er / (/ You are hereby Commanded to summon if. Carson Holman whens Nig aids gags the Defendant above named, if he be found within your Cou ity, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of Iredell. at the Court House inStatesville _ sails on the. L1tB, Monday after the Ast, Monday of March "thie Samia being he tye day of May and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if he _ Sail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 17th» day of March sp" mene — ‘ ; Nl ey, ~ % ; a & r ms iad q j : \ & : ¥ a a ‘ : anita vp a . Poe as entaron wa ere | Tr. | Jel ee oe or oe | OR age eee eg ok s Re ae Ce ee | Pe fe , ae wees : Se Beet Ed | ; | ' ' ! i i | 3 > t : ' ' ; tay ae S 5S g . : £ ; } \ | ya ' i 1 : Pooh Bae eee? a | 3: ie ei ‘4 A aed 2 Sif eo i i ah ie | [2 eT OS S | + 5 ie |) ie . RY (te: ‘ee | Yo 2 a io } 5 iO | a mi ei 4 ea] J sg — ie | be = | Belod er oe S: 3 | Pp aii i | ot 6 ' ' i ~ ss | : { t ' ‘ : ' ’ ba | — ' ; me | t i 3 mona | ' ‘ ad > | Rie s ee | ge ON Se al ges 2 ae = I ' ; } ; mind | > cbicittieniinasienciad sii i. i a i C6I fo finp™ $14} aul ado fag pagrsasgns puD 07 uLOMy ‘suongnoaxa wos pduiaxe fijsadoad pun $043171901) ‘szgap Sty anogD pun 4ano Sanzjop paapuny om fo wns ay2 yj4om 81 ay shvs usoms Guraq toe (-ypas) ae (*79a9) ("7DaS$) 061 "a ‘*V fo fvp 814) ‘8]Da8 pun SpuDYy {NO Ssauz14 “uorjoD Sty} ur“ Hyung yy fo 4900004 finw quo : -puafag ay} $v ys00 yons fo = qunpuefeg oy} find ynys tieperl ’ Sryuiig #3 Jr*sanamoy “proa oq 04 ‘savqjoq ¥ eo fo wns ay ut ‘uorjon sty} ut qudpuafog ey} BT ee eae ojun punog saajesino abpaymouyoo amy ‘aNOdU ysurpbn § ‘fiqunog "7An0g L0Lsadng ay) UT (‘VNITOUNVD HLLYON HO ZLV.LS WOSIRD “UBW]OP ‘SA SIPJeS “UeW]OH £061 uOsIeD “UPI O}] ‘SA OI]yeS “UeWTOH] £061 North Carolina, ‘ In the Superior Court, Tredell County. May Term,1902. Sallie Holman * vs. : Complaint.» Carson Holman. : The plaintiff,Sallie Holman,complains and alleges ; First :- That in the year 1889 during the aonth of October — the defendant, Carson Holran intermapried with the plaintiff Sallie /' according to law,ami thenceforward from that time until the present time the marriagé relation has existed between the said parties. Second:- That the said defendant lived with the said vlaintiff some eleven or twelve years as man and wife, Third:~ That during the nonth of Pebruary,1901 the said defendant Carson Holman did wilfully and without Cause abandon the said plaintiff, Sallie Holman and did live in adultry with one Jean Patterson inthe county of Iredell and State of North Caroliga for a month or more and then went with the said Jean Patterson to the home of her father and there continued to live in adultry with the said Jean Patterson for several months. Fourth: That the said plaintiff,Sallie Holman has not lived with the said Carson Holman,since he has lived in adultry with the said Jean Patterson. Wherefor> the plaintiff hereby makes application to the court ;: That the court make an order that the said mérriace be dissolved and that the parties thereto be divorced from the bonds of matrimony upon the ground that the said defendant did live in adultry with the aforenentioned Jean Patterson. — +t oe °° oS & — b & PP an sf BB. S Be ~ £061 Sallie Holman bein duly sworn deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of her knowledge and belief, except as to those matters stated on information and bel@ef and as to that she believes it to be true,and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between husband and wife,and not for the mere ourooss of being freed and severated from each other ,but in sincerity and truth’ for the causes mentioned in the complaint - ~ that the said anes have existed t the inowledge of affiant for more than six months prior to the filing of this — complaint +: that the complainant cia been a resident of the Stiite | of : forth Carolina for two years vreceding war Ae of, this comolaint. z Mh Neh nec tor poy ‘ Affiant. Swora to and subscribed before the undersigned Notary Public of Tredell County, North Carolina,this 7th day of April, 1902. Notary Public. citi sialauialt* oc sale at The Mascot Job Office, Statesville, N. C. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. To the Sheriff of You are hereby Commanded to Summon personally to appear Court House in....£ the truth to say in behalf of ina ——— said gay depending, and then and th ere to be tried, wherein Clerk Supéklor Court of Iredell County. pd baled > i = Be PP NA & & 45 — vi £061 ee . emmemequececewscoosce sn coggive coccanee: soseesher sens cores Zreuendqng 1019 ras PS (ss yrepaayed ; S ceawsaaleg Eo no ee een gees nn cane fan a bn derannens t¢ seweee Holman, Sallie vs. Holman, Carson 1903 oa bt thes oP | : tine. Oa Ae ei daca wag penn oA mere ere i aS AOA, PTET : : f f ‘ { Holman, Sallie vs. Holman, Carson 1903 uosIeD “UeWTOH] ‘SA O1]JBS “UeWOH £061 BILL OF COSTS.—CIVIL.—Printed and for sale at The Landmark Job Office, Statesville, N.C. 1 ee ts RMA hm ARI ECRBAONEH 2-1-’96-1m. Original Summons, or other original process, names therein arging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders.... | Motion, Entry and Record of. Rakes Notice, for each name over one in same paper S | Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support... .. ce cossese Docketing same Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual County Tax, when Jury impaneled Referee’s Allowance Sheriff. Magistrate Plaintiff's Witnesses... (‘apor 2q} 44 paxy sp ) [1at—-S$soD f0 [tT “14990 MAID cesnseneneeneneeeenee Qy Holman, Sallie vs. Holman, Carson 1903 SUMMONS FOR RE.LIEF.—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C 3-15- 13-1M. 2. bee County~- Gn the Superior Court. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant ....above named, if. dda be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of........... Su te (. at the Court House in SLM ou: Lk. on the.4- Ch. Monday atter the./ aq> ......Monday of the same being the...) {Ms day of AA. (, 191.4., and answer the complaint, a copy of g y 9 P PY which will be deposited in the office of {he Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant.........take notice if..4 Ly snes failSto answer to the said complaint will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this S tt. day 9 agit 191.2 Hla Hi QJ 1 ourt ¢ oha.. € County. within that time, the plaintiff Clerk of Super aiyTes “SoWw]OH rlél iS | Fy Pee emery | OL ® 2 Ad «| le bY s} AQ < 8, & g a fei | na i a Ww 5 ny Las nm | Pe. a « a ™ ‘ = o = i 9 « | 1. £. Ge a s> ~*~ | iam yr oe} Br] ° nm |. N ey iN ° : > PIS RY ATS 4 a a TZ °s VA PR A 2 ol: 3 ; eT TPP eo PPA” - ‘) >>| ee hep | Set 1A 7 mo} CN i ok} ’ ¢ ce 3 ne oT fs OP a4 oS & | Ss | 5 : a < mo g¢ + 7% ‘ = a , . ~= 161 jo Aep 314} PUI B10Jaq paqliosqns pue 0} TOMS ‘SHOLjNIaKe WOIy dutaxa Ajiedoid pur sarjiyiqet] ‘syqap sil] DAOge pue 13aA0 Si¥][Op peipuny OM} jo Wns 34) 4jI0M St dy SA¥S DIOMS BuIEq (189) (189g) (189g) 161 ‘qv jo Aep Sty} ‘seas pue spuey ino ssoithin "moTjOR Sty} ur” PUGeg 34} jo 19A0901 Av JUEPHdjeq F1]} se ysOO yons |[e yuepuajeq ay} Aed {yeqs” oa yuurelg oy} jt ‘aasmoy ‘pIOA 9q 03 ‘sre[jog ‘yO Gins 94} Ut “GoIjOR SIq} Ut jUepuajeg 23 “OJAN PUNO SaAjasino adpajMonyoe ay LSNIVOV ‘Ayunod \ *'¥NITONVO HLNON 4O SUL¥LS ‘yNOD s0sadng aq} uy ayes “SoujoH "SA WRG ‘SOW]OH rlél & North Carolina, § In the Superior Court, Iredell County. § As of July Term, 1913, Sam Holmes Vs. , CO 8 LAE ey Sallie Holmes§ laintiff complainin® of the defendant, alleges and says: Firat, time during’ th® month of , 48, in Tredell County, State of North Carolina, the plaintiff and defendant inter- married and lived together as man and wife until in February, 1908, the plaintiff was arrested and placed in the County Jail of Iredell t the Ma the Superior Court of said Couty of to the County Chain Gang for the term he served, Second, That while the plaintiff was confined in the County Jail and serving the term on the Chain gang as aforesaid, the said defendant, | totally disregarding the solemnity of the marradage vow, and without wr - Hy 4 > ault on the part of the plaintiff, took up w th,and com mited with one _.. and divers other persons, as vlaintiff is in= A formed and believes; that while the plainitff was confined in the Jail on the County Chain iforesaid, and not having had sectual period of more than twelve months the reason imprisoned and confimed in the Jail on the whain lefendant save birth to a child whose farther its wlmow ik n to this plaintiff, Third, 6 the plaintiff nas, +.ved with,or received the defendant in since his knowledge of her conduct, and since being unty Jail and on the Chain gang as aforesaid, ayes “SowyjoH ‘SA WRG ‘SOW]OH rlél ates “SouljOH] "SA WBS ‘SOU]OH rlél Foutth, That the plaintiff has been a boni fide resident of the state of North Carolina for more than two years next preceeding the com- mencementtof this action, \ f Fifth, That the facts set forth and contained herein have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action; WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands judgemnt that he be franted an absolate divorce @rom the bonds of matrimony with the defendant, 4a Attorneys for plaintif?, Sam Holmes being duly sworn, deposes and says, that th e facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by colluston between himself and the defendant, and not for the meme purpose of being feeed and seperated from each other, sincerity but in and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that in said complaint as grounds for diy existed to affiants lknow the facts set forth orce have ledge for more than six months prior to the commencement of this action, and that the plaintiff has been a boni fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years FMQEM prior to the commencement of this action or the filing ne of this complaint, Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 28t day of August, 1913, C8. eee ee erdVe Se; Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M--5—,04. ' q STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, — _County--GREETING: | Defendent...... And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. Witness .... Clerk Superior Court for G: CES ayes “sowujoH "SA WRG ‘SOW]OH rlél ~ O 5 = oO yy y i = — ae) a o — = = > oO a5 ~Y 5 < y rlél et TT TT SRT wend or PRPC! Srey FRET EEN pauses ah ; . Loni Ce ANY Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 4 2M—5—,04. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, TO THE SHERIFF OF Be Le. County--GREETING: Dou are ree Commanded to Summon Cf MAL the Court House in on the.. one ($04; ea cues ceiy ms matte, next, then and there fo testify and the truth to say in behalf of... del na ~~ Plaintiff... and..... Defendent..... Witness ... erk Superior Court for ayes “souljoH ‘SA WRG “SOWl]OH rlél “ } hifer. e et Lofts | J 7 Z 7 ESTE Ale Lyf b, 4-4, © Carine arTes “Sew|OH ‘SA WRG “SOU]OF rlé6l ae a mame Pe OG ret | Ch Lh | t Ga ! Obl “ HI e aiyfes ‘Sow]OH ‘SA Wes ‘SOW]OH rlél Holmes, Sam vs. Holmes, Sallie 1914 arffes ‘Sow]OH ‘SA Weg ‘SOW]OH rl6l North Garolina, { In the Superior Court, Iredell County. @ May Term, 1914, Sam Holmes ‘{ Vs. { IUD GBB NT. Sallie Holmes | Ipliyp This cauee coming on to be heard at the May Bene ed the Superior Court of lredell County, and being heard-before His Honor W.F, Harding, Judge Presiding, and a Jury, and the Jury having answered the issues as follows: ist, Did the Plaintiff and the defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer, Yes. 2nd, Has the plaintiff been a boni fide resident of North Carolina for two years next preceeding the commencement of this action? Answer, Yes. 3rd, Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer, Yes. It is therefore order and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of Matrimony existing between the plaintiff, Sam Holmes, and the defendant, Sallie Holmes, be and the same are hereby desolved, and the plaintiff is granted: an absolute divorce from the defendant, Judge Presiding, / ad RAR aN SAY HOLMES vs. SALLIE HOLMES JUDGMENT, Holmes, Sam vs. Holmes, Sallie 1914 Bill of Coste—Civil,—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Print , Statesville, N, C, } Original Summons, a tlier cena prone eee names therein . POLAR Reta s . .$ 1.00] a eee ey a oss -25}}----|- ee ee Pe oh... eee a | Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification . | I AE OU oS ee ee gh alc Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each.. 10 I gS chal igh vai ws ad de selth bh: « peokens Micom CRicm A j Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing. ....... Issuing Commission... ................ Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate. ....... RES aia wie ae Si eae eon oak wR ek Motion, Entry and Record of. ............ J Judgment Against NN EG Se a eRe a a ecg ere oe ate hae | Notice, for each name over one in same paper. .... . 10} Me eS ; EE EMM 55s OLS ed ee a Bl dey eee el es a tee ee Te } Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided... | eee I~ ; / Judgment ffnalintermtime...... 1.00} f 4 i. es ‘ j Judgment final befure Clerk... .........-.., -50 | oa Bee Judgment in favor of Widow's Year’s Support . ... . . a) = sha EN Sh U 5s a vy gi hs ob cas SoS wa he bo 25]... . ae me, er nee eae uae ee x0] at see BS NS EEE AT BONS A OME Ce RTE NE OE 25 | ee __| coe te ee ee eee eee EPRI RUM i OS ea MGS aE yd co on (Vi cpr f ~” . ES oh ecb yt en voy ae oce oem 10}. [A Be ae I gg Cai see ibe CRN as Oe aie ‘ ee oa | : bat Si ee aa aun : SN MINUS 1 ceo Wlicg! “ots aloha area 50 l. i Sa ' Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal oak | ie VN ; geet E a edie PO Lacs Pig County Tax, when Juryimpaneled........... 3.01 xh Lt, Referee's Allo 46 . f£ J b } Sheriff. 7 Y EN i.) bib es! 0 oe oh bik bak LES ES eae Ales a We gk kL ag Pi igid te hig gue va 7, . . . . ayes “sewj]OH ‘SA Weg “SoW]OH rlél CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) Holmes, Sam vs. Holmes, Sallie 1914 "SA “D) “MQ “NOKouOFy ezyq Arey “ynoXouozy cl6l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N.C, SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Dou are Hereby Comitanded to. summon 5 a Te dels abl i itey? £ few *) j \G the defendant... above named, if.< as bE tonne within your Cotnty, to om, op and appear before the Jadge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the Séunty of x Ant the House i in Ltakaada tl, b= Lie / Aa — @ LOM AMK L6H: Monday he Monday? of. : the sane Being the 7 - day of GAMA ty fii L1G f 2mad answer the complaint, a copy of which willbe deposited in the office of the Cletk of the Superior Cotift' for'said Countys'within the fitstithres days; of said: Term, and letsaid. Defendant..:...,take notice if they fail'to answer to thesaid complaint Within that. time, the plaintiff..........will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint, Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due. return. 1 eo Y w11tL i Zr if Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. G3 yay of ff= \ /, Clk of Superior Court... W244 F pee ee Hof onth Te Tteite the When Brinnand this ra Fie o. ~~ tho CLL, f 2 (2 J fo "SA “D) “AQ “WINDKouOFT eziq Arey ‘ynoXouopy cl6l “03 a[quurnzay 1317378 801 SNOWWAS Y —? PUBL VA ~~JO WNOD soyedng 243 jo LSNIVOV i R S}q) 2Ut s10J9q pequiosqns pue 0} nIOMS “SHOWNSEXS Woy yduraxa Ay1adoid pue SPH IGet] ‘syqap sty aaoge pu saA0 S¥[[9P Perpuny OM} jo uINs 243 4}I0M st oq ses TOMS Sutaq" YO epost greg pue spuvy ino ssony My “Ronse sq) a ByUTEL ay) Jo taA0002 Lem JUBpUszeq 24} Se }s00 ~ BABEL” 94) jt ‘raaomoy JO Uns 94} UF ‘aoNDe stqy UF Wepuajaq ay} O74 PUNO SeAlesINO a3p2;monyoE a4, LSNIVOV “Ayano, “‘HNOD s0Vadng 943 Uy] : “¥NIIONYD HLUON 4O FALYLS "SA “D “AQ ‘WNOAsuO0F{ eziyq Arey, ‘ynoAouopy cl6l North Carolina In the Superior Court. Iredell County. July Term,1912. W.T.Honeyeutt -vVSs- CONPLAINT. Mary Elizer Honeycutt. The Plaintiff complaining of the defendant,alleges ; (First) That on or about the_ dey of Feb.1907 the plaintiff and defendant were married and lived together as man and wife until the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in Aug.1907. (Second) That on or ebout the---day of Aug.1907,the defendant disregarding the Solemnity of the marriage vow,wiffully and without cause abandoned the plain- tiff and ever since has,and still continues so to wilfully and without cause desert and abandon the plaintiff and to live Separate and apart from him without any sufficient reason or cause. (Third} That shortly after the marriage of plaintiff and defendant , defendant began to neglect plaintiff and to shirk her duties as a faithful and dutiful wife:that she became very ill tempered and violently querreled with pleintirr 7 that her ill temper grew worse and worse until finally about the---day of Aug.1967, she Shamfully abused the plaintiff and accused him of immoral and unlawful conduct with other women,all of which was without eny foundation and eactree? false,and al whial atime and conduct of this plaintiff by the defendant wendered the ndition of t leintiff intolerable and ourdensome.This conduct and treatment on the part of the defendant to metime in the month of Aug.1907:defendant served ce 01 leintif?’ that she was tired of living with him and would not either longer wi him or bear his name any longer;whereupon defendant did then leave and abandon plaintiff and has so continued to desert and Live separate « him ever That the VS herein contained and set forth as e mplaint have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more six mont iext preceeding the WHEREFORE plaintiff? demands Judement tha granted a DIVORCE "SA “D) “MM “NOAouOFF eziq Arey ynoXouopy cl6l { fi FROM DED AND BOARD, ‘Atty. for Pletntife. W.T.Honeyeutt being duly sworn,deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belie? and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and the defendant, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated fror each other,but in sincerity and truth,for the causes mentioned in the complaint. The facts set forth in said complaint 8S grounds for divorce have existed to affiants knowledge for more than six months frior to the filing of this complaint and that the plaintif? has been a boni fide resident of the state of North Carolina for more than vo years prior to the filing of thia complaint. ZZ ee pelt Sworn to and subseribed before me ~ this the 7#day of Z.41912. Co, ' eziyq Arey] ‘ynoXouop{ "SA “D “A ‘WNdAoUOH ht \o —_ Ww eT AR IE CER ptt. a cee RENE f f | ' E ' é , enema Honeycutt, W. G. vs. Honeycutt, Mary Eliza 1913 "SA “D “MA SNOAQUOPY ezyq Arey ‘ynoXouopy cl6l | Me Vp Uteedbh e+, fart, 2-6 GZ. i | ft 12d ae ere : oe a ; { i } 47 Me Binet, Aidit: yal eh mie sg! ve 07 havea | F-Ag Bivcpoce, pe lpi la ae ee oad nlp ll. Cz dm Osses Sl Mee Fe 2+} Honeycutt, W. G. vs. Honeycutt, Mary Eliza 1913 Bill of Costs—Civil.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N, C. — a . fA ] Appeal from Clerk to Judge County. Order for enlarging time of pleading | Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in } a. Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification . Wt } Order of Arrest ‘SA “ED "A ‘WNoKou07 ezi[q Arey “ynoXouopy cl6l } Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian . . . elec el ” A ZA Motion, Entry and Record of + CV Eee aes Judgment Against Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . ‘j Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Omnpett ow cs Docketing same eting ex parte Proceedings ] ‘ Judgment | _ Summons Indexing Judgment | Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgment xecution anf Sheriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . l Defendant's Witnesses. CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL, (As Fixed by the Code.) Vea St4 Term, ek [ice Back 1% ere? Honeycutt, W. G. vs. Honeycutt, Mary Eliza SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 3-15- 13-1M. Iredell County--9n the Superior Court. Mrs B.C.Horton AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. T.¥.Horton State of North Capolina, To the Sheriff of Iredell County—GREE TING: Dou are Hereby Commanded to summon T.*.Horton the defendant ... above named, if...he.....be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County ee. .......at the Court House in Statesville on the fifth Monday meee the. : Monday of .Maroh 1915 the same being the...... 28th. day of... January..1915. .191...., and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant....take notice if...he..they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Oct 914. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 16 day of woh ober 191 I Clerk of Superior Court... ‘4 jy WoLOH ‘SA “2D “Gg UOHOH 9161 axe : aR BRU Bi NRORES Se nits ‘Py i = ~paaraoayy aSeortyy uy punoz } pousoul 03 e[Qeuinjoy : COLE or cham | wad 161 Dewaerccewecereessccccvegrocove- te ccccececwsesccneneeecoesecsoscsswas rut kuepe ‘4gITIY YO1 SNOWWAS | Yoyo ES Aqunog [lepezr _ “gou st WEST UIST weqoysg =~ CS 161 ‘m1 a “eq. 09 ‘AWUNOOTT Spe jo Wnog aouadng 243 jo ce UP Pr yueys ‘AduIONY s.yryarelg jo Aep SI} 9Ul s10Jaq paqiosqns pue 0} WI0MS ‘suol]NoexH Wor ydutaxe Aj1adoid pue sarjtyi1qet] ‘s}qop SIy aA0qe pue 13A0 SIe[jOp peipuny OM} jo MINS 94} 4VIOM St aq ghes nIOMS Suleq ({e9g) (jeg) (1e9g) jo Aep ““St4} ‘s[eas pue spuey ino ssanzI ‘uO1jOB SIy} UI HUUle[_ 2G) JO 1940901 Avur"~ yuRpuayaq,,aty}. $B ys00 yous |[e yuepurjag ayy, Aed [jeys™ Di YHUre[_ 34) Ft ‘Taaamoy ‘pIOA 3q 0} ‘sie[[og JO WINS 94} UL ‘Gojoe stq} ut JUBPUSjIq 24} ““OJaN punog saatasino s8pa;MouyoE 34, LSNIVOV ‘Ajunod | "‘¥NITONVO HLNON 4O AL¥LS ‘yunoD s0oedng aq) uy _ ‘I ‘UOHOP ‘SA “SQ “Gf “UOHOH 9161 “a7 Uo0vopH ‘SA “CD “G UOYOH 9161 é + North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County. Jany Term 1915. Mrs B.C.Horton 1 v6 { Complaint T.F.Horton . j Plaintiff above named complaining of the @efendant , for cause of action alleges and says: First. That on the 9th day of June 1901,in the- City of Statesville N.C. plaintiff and defendant intermarried , and ever since have been,and now are,husband and wife Second. That plaintiff is and has been a Tres ident of this State for « period of two years ,and more, imme- diately preceeding the commenoment of this action. Third. That on the day of August 1912,de- fendant abandoned plaintiff ,oby wilfully and without cause leaving her at their former home in the City of Statesville N.C. and departing the State,or keeping himself concealed within the State and away from the plaintiff,and negeloting and failing + her with any support whatever Fourth, That on the day seek teas, as Plaintiff ie advised and believes,defendant commited adultry to provide with one Hattie Staley who was then living in the town of Wilkesboro N.C. and that before and since said date the defendant comrited acts of advltry with the said Hattie Staley,and has been living in adultery with said Hattie Staley in the town of Wilks- . boro North Carolina where they lived as man and wife ,at dif- ferent intervals since said day of April 1913,as plaintiff is advised and believes. Wherefore plaintiff demands that the bonds of mat- rimony between hereelf and the defendant be-disolved ,nd for costes of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. FO AF. B.C.Horton after being duly sworn deposes and says ;that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of her knowledge ,information and belief ,and that said complaint is not made out of levity or by, collusion between herself and her husband ,nor for the mear purpose of being freed and separated .from each other but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned therein ;That the facte eet forth in said complaint have existed to her knowledge at least for six mon- the prior to the filing of the complaint ,and that ghe has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years and more next before the filing of the complaint This dayoof November 1914, iy LL | ee eer el inet C.6.C. ‘q [| ‘UOvOH ‘SAD “G “UOLOH 9161 ‘4 (| WouoH] 'SA“2D “g UOMO} 9161 North Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County. Before the Clerk VB. AFFIDAVIT FOR PUBLICATION. } J Mre B.C.Horton | ' T,.F,Horton . Mra B.C.Horton ,being duly sworn ,deposes and says That an the above entitled action now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County ,the sheriff has returned the summons issued to him in said action endorsed "T,F,Horton is not to be found in Iredell County" ; That said defendant can not after due diligence be found within the State ; That the said defendant ig a proper part to said it it being an action to dissolve the bond of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant and to secure an absolute divorce for plaintiff from the defendant on the grounds defendants living in fornication and adultery with a pereon to affiant unknown . Wherefore plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the court that service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some news paper published in Iredell County , N.C. as provided by law in such CaseU. This October 16th 1914. m4 _¢ BL Vorlor [pe Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 16th day of oct 1914. —_— oe $6 PP sw nO < y 9161 ZEB. V. LONG JNO. A. SCOTT, Jr. | Lone & ScorTr ATTORNEYS AT LAW STATESVILLE,N.C. North Carolina ) Iredell County ) JeH. Morr published in Iredell ¢ and says that the fore duly publ&#hed in ison,Editor of the Sentinal a n ounty,N.C.,first being g0ing and ewspaper duly sworn,deposes annexed notice of summons was the said Statesville Sentinal for a period of four consecutice wecks,beginning with the issue o? said dated October 17th,1914 and en i 1914. Subscribed and sworn to before me this the Ala March 7th,1915. printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer,, Statesville, N. C. Civil Subpoena. STATE OF NORTH CAROL To THE SHERIFE OFZ. etl onrennr County--GREETING: Wou are pereby Commanded to Summon personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said count the Court House in Clefk Superior Court for fla pale °° aa 5 6 PF iw 7m O ea vi 9161 af A North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County.’ bipoki © ~ 19 (J Mrs B.C.Horton 1 ve J AMENDED COMPLAINT. T.F.Horton . { The plaintiff above named by leave of court files this he amended complaint in the above entitled action and for cause of action alleges and says. First. That on the 9th day of June A.D. 190D1., in the City of Statesville ,County of Iredell State of North Carolina , plaintiff and defendant intermarried,and ever since said time have been and now are husband and wife. Second. That pliantiff is and has been a res- ident of the State of North Carolina for a period of two years ,and more ,immediately before the commenoment of this action . Third. That on or about the __ day of August 1913., defendant abandoned plaintiff ,by wilfully and without cause leaving he at their home in the city of Statesville N.C. and departing the State of N.C.,or keep- ing himself concealed within the State and away from the plaintiff ,and wilfully failing and neglecting to provide her with any support whatever. Fourth. That on or about the _ day of March 1915., as plaintiff is advised and believes , the defendant conmi ttedgadul tery arte. Hattie Staley who was then living with the defendant in the city of Fit. salw __ ine. and that before and since said day the defendant committed acts of adultery with the said Hattie Staley in said city and elsewhere within the State of North Carolina ,as plaintiff is advised and veleives . Fifth. That said acts of adultery were com- mittted without the consent ,connivance or procurement of thie plaintiff and p&aintiff hae not since nee acte of 4] ‘WOHOH] ‘SA “2 “Gg UOWOH 9161 adultery cohabited with the defendant . Wherefore plaintiff demands that the bonds of matrimony between herself and the plaintiff be disolved and that she be allowed to resume her maiden name ,and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper. Attorney for plaintiff . B.C.Horton ,after being duly sworn deposes and says ; that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of her knowtedge ,information and belief,and that said complaint is not made out of levity or ool- lusion between herself and her husband ,nor for the 7mear purpose of being freed and separated from each other but in sincerity and truth for the casues mentioned therein: That the facts set forth in said complaint have existed to her knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this her amended complaint ,and that she hae been a resi- dent of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next before the filing of her complaint. Thies Sept 15th 1915 Be fee Sw rn to and subscribed before me this the 15th day of Sept 1915. ‘ — 7 yo D e . d ¥ | iiiaatiliaaics ee ae ee +> - QO . * 4 A. /- Po Me. “4 (jy UOWOH ‘SA “SD “g ‘UOHOH 9161 North Carolina, { In the Superior Court, Iredell County. { Before the Clerk, Mrs, B.C, Horton { Vs. { ORDER OF PUBLICATION, T.F,. Horton { This cause coming on to be heard, and being heard,and it nem appearing to the Court from the affidavit of the plaintiff, Mrs, B,C, Horton, that the defendant, T.F. Horton, can not after due diligence to locate him be found in the State of North Carolina or Iredell Younty, and that the plaintiff has a good cause of action against the defendant, and it futher appearing to the Court that the defendant has departed from the State and that his whereabouts is now unknown to the plaintiff: It is therefore ordered by the Court that notice of this action be published in the Sentinel, a news paper published in Iredell County, for four successive weeks setting fotth the title of the action, with a brief and plain statement of the cause and subject matter thereof, and requiring the defendant to appear at the January Term,1915 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to be held on the Fifth Yonday before the First Monday in Warch,1915, the same being the 25th, day of January, 1915, and answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff. his the 16th, cay of October, 1915, of the Superior court. North Carolina, { In the Superior Court, Iredell County. { January Term, 1915, Mrs, B.C, Horton { NOTICE OF SERVICE OF SUMYONS BY PUBLICATION, Vs. T.F, Horton . The defendant above named, T.F. Horton, will take notice that a summons in the above entitled action was issued against the said defendant on the 16th. day of October, 1914, by James A, Hartness, Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell Younty, State of North Carolina, wherein the above named plaintiff sues for a divorce absolute from said defendant on the grounds of Fornication and Adultry on the part of said defendant, and the said defendant is required to appear and answer oe demur to the complaint at the January Term 1915 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, which will be held at Statesville, Iredell County, ‘orth Carolina, on the FIFTH MONDAY BEFORE THE FIRST YONDAY IN MARKCH,1915, the same being the 25th, day of January, 1915, at which time said summons is made returnable, or judgment will be given against him at said term of Court, This the / 7 day of October, 1914, North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County. Jany Term 191 Mre B.C.Horton \ vs ] ISSUES. T. F. Horton 1 Firet. Did the plaintiff and defen’ant intermarry as alleged in the complaint ? Answer ¢ Is the plaintiff4@ resident of the State of North Carolina and has she resided in the State for two years immediate y be- fore the commencement of | this ac}ho Answer A one Hattie Staley Did the defendant commit adultery wit ced in the complaint ? and live in adultery with her as le Answer “qj ‘UOuOH ‘SA “2 “G UOUOH 9161 ‘4 [| WOWOH ‘SA “2D “G UOHOH 9161 North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County. Jany Term 1916 Mre B.C.Horton J vs | Judgement. eG Horton. { This cause coming on to be heard and being heard at this term of the court before His Honor -G.S.Fergueon Judge Presiding and a jury; and His Honor having submitted, and. the Jury having anewered, the following issues as follows, to wit: FIRST.Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Anawer. Yes. SECOND. Is the plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina ,and has she resided in the State for two years immediately before the commenoment of this action? Answer Yes, THIRD. Did the defendant commit fornication and adultery with one Hattie Staley and live in adultery with her as Sllegded in the complaint? Answer Yes. It is therefore considered ,adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and defendant be ,and the same are ,dissolved and the parties plaintiff and de- fendant are hereby divorced from the bonds of matrimony. It is further considered and adjudged that theplaintiff be, and she is hereby , permitted and allowed to resume her maiden name. It is further considered and adjudged that plaintiff pay the coste of this action to be taxed by the clerk of this court. Ud tergadaue Judge Presiding . ‘fl ‘woo ‘SA'S "Gg ‘UOHOH 9161 Bill of Costs—Civil—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Co., Statesville, N. C. No. Docket | Original Summons, Other oF ; 1 SSS names therein ginal process, including all Every copy of same IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. |i." toe [4 i] Appeal from Justices. . Appeal from Clerk to Judge County. Oider for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders. Attachment, Order in Mege| gaint - Injunction Order, including Bond and Justification. . . . Order of Arrest | Subpoena, RaAme... Tilia ’ Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian Continuance. . . Motion, Entry and Record of Notice.. Notice, for each name over one in same paper . . Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided. Judgment final in term time.. Judgment final before Clerk... . Judgment ih favor of Widow's Year's Support. . . . Docketing same Docketing ¢x parte Proceedengs . . . e Summons... . Indexing Judgment.. Filing Papers... .--+--+ Postage, actual S24. C2 r Transcript of Judgement. #xeeution of Sherriff's Return . . Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal . . ‘Transcript to Supreme Court. . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when jury impaneled . . Referee’s Allowance. . Sheriff a a bee aia ai i ia to te nae asec . PRetianrhtl, Aen. Constable. Magistrate Plaintiff's Witnesses. . Defendant's Witnesses . CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS-CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) Horton, B. C. vs. Horton, T. F. soy ‘ednoy ‘SA UlATeD ‘odnopY 7061 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 3-29-’011M Seedick County.--In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. To the Shetict —Setactte County—GREETING: Wou are Hereby Commanded to Summon... the Defendant... above named, y tlhe . be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of .. Lae shee . at the Court House in DP xth. tee Posy Noey ther the . pat . Monday of 27 aeed. the same being the 7 2 day Poet GN answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant... take notice if fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff . will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 4 £ day of 190 x“ Clerk of Superior Court “ Fé cle es County. In the Superior Court. Cenk Th pierce Coil y STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY. Wile 5. 2! SS Renard, to be-voilts however, if the eS .shall pay the Defendant........ ‘all swe cost as the Defend- being sworn says he is worth the sum of two hundred dollars over and above his debts, liabilities and property exempt from executions. Sworn to and subscribed before me this Ax. Term, 1909 Oa t— $ GO. Plaintiffs Attorney. ¥ JAN 16° 1905 JAN- 20-1985 County Received & fee of the Superior Court of C24 Qe ftLa fo. Abs. Fee Mileage, Returnable to - © > A S/S 3 PEN fe a iy a ee = | stead oka sin Rg Q | | = CoQ sory ‘odnoy ‘SA UlATeD ‘odnopY y061 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 3-29-’011M oe ALLE Couinty iS the Superior Court. aN 4 Afy A. AGAINST : SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ie CA ee Bewke os @ zy .. Monday of . acter the same being the es: and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant... take notice if ae. fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff .. will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. -Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. is 2) Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this ..—<» a day of Oz. Sn. 190 *K NAA ates hi Clerk of Superior Court .%@-<-2€<< County. sorry ‘adnoy "SA UlATeD ‘odnopy 061 sorry ‘adnoy ‘SA ulAyeD ‘odnopy 7061 ~ SBearry ‘APMIONY synurelg ~ PPATII9y “Ayunos Ha apprise TUPTEY Od SNOWMDS | LISNIVOV =D - yo meg r0Hedng ax jo fe PALL me P61 “m2, ~ fo hop $14} aul ad0fag pagisosqns pup 0} usoms “suorjnoexa wodf yduaxa fysadoad pun sarzinqny ‘syqgap sty anogn pup 4an0 S4D]/0p paapuny om} yo wns ay} yj40m s1 ay sips usoms Butrag ("yag) (*7pag) ("7pag) 061 ‘a ‘V fo hop . S14} ‘$]Des Pun spuDy imo ssauziy “uonjan sty) ur 5 yuanpg ay) fo 4an0ve4 fom’ ~~qun ~puafaq] ay] 8D 4809 Yyans 7]D quppuafeg ey} find ynys ’ Siang ay) fi ‘4anamoy ‘pron eq 0} ‘sanjjog ~~ Jo Wns ay} Ut ‘uorjOD S14] ul quDpuafeg ay; oyun punog saajas.ino aipajmouyon ony LSNTIVOV ‘ALNNO9 "y4no) aorsadns eyjur =< “¥NIIONVO HLYON SO GL¥LS aay “odnoy ‘SA UIATeD ‘odnoyY y061 r North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County January Term, 1905. Caivin Houpe vs COMPLAINT. Alice Houpe The plaintiff complains of the defendant amd says: First. That he and the defendant married and became husband and wife to each other about 16 years ago and continued to live to gether for sometime. Second. That the defendant in this action some 12 or 14 years ago willfully, knowingly, deliberately and without any provocation or cause or conduct on the part of the plaintiff abandoned him, and has lived separate and apart from him for the past ten yr twelve years. Third. That the plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years next preceeding the commencement of t his action. Fourth. That the facts herein contained and set forth as a Complairt have existed to his knowledge more than five years next preceeding eo 2 Attorney Pa Se 6 Pees Calvin Houpe, the plaintiff in thé ahove entitled action, the commencement of this action. being duly sworn says; that the facts set forth in the foregbing Com- plaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between him- self and the defendant, his wife, nor for the mere purpose of hetng freed and separate from each other, but in sincerity and truth for: 2. G = ° cS e “as = o oo ° 8 O e. < ~~ < 7061 the causes mentioned in the Complaint. The plaintiff further alleges that the facts set forth in his Compleint as grounds for this divorce have existed to his knowledge for more than five years prbor to the filing of this Complaint, and that the plaintiff has been a bona fide red@ident of the State of North Carolina for more than five years next precedding the commencement of this action. Whereforg,the plaintiff demands judgment that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between himself’ and the defendant be dissolved, and that he »be freed and discharged from any lisbilify or responsibility to the defendant because of the relationship here- tofore existing between them. Wworn to and subscribed before me this the 28th day of December 1904. ; Seger ic ee a CaN. sory “odnoy "SA ulAyed ‘odnoy 7061 Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Prirted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT . County. Subpena, each name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian... .. Conti Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing. Issuing Commission TOO ieok spus hosed Notice, for each name over one in same paper Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support } Docketing same Docketing ex parte Proceedings “ Judgment “ Summons Defendant's Witmesses... .....cc..cecsscessee secsosesess,. wiebiabbes “ CIVIL DOCKET. ¢ ‘ ’ BILL OF COSTS—CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) Houpe, Calvin vs. Houpe, Alice 1904 No. 109.---COMPLAINT TO OBTAIN PEACE WARRANT Complaint and Warrant Combined, —Printed and for sale by the Cole Printing Company, Sanford, NN. C. NORTH we a wat 9. AF Hor HW, unlawfully and w ae 3 that$he has reason to fear, and does fear, that the said _ rs LE. will commit the offence so threatened, and prays that the said____ oe fb. Lao "naan sage anan mana anna --------~~--..--..may be required to find sureties to keep the peace. Sworn to before me, this... ee. -day of STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , A AM Canatal) a AN athan Law?y] Officer of Ww Asay Wess vAwie Ul Ww Wael Miss Ud 44iUGi asnaaligbisenpcink vie gilicgeie . County--- GREETING: You are commanded fort hwith to arrest_______ , and him r Safely keep, so that you have him before me at my Office in__._.@2*-&-t 2 wt fy <= tame oe OM some other Magistrate of said county, immediately, to answer the above complaint ae e , and be dealt with as the law directs. P., (SEAL. ) eee . | . | . Houpe, Grace vs. Houpe, J. R. 1914 a8) ° % © 3 2 oO ao < av SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. al Cphcte. County.-- In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant...above named, if. hi be found within your County, to be and appear before the Jadge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of at the Court House in Whe : .on the eo Monday’ after the } som Monday/of )..47Z the same being the 2b day of () AAAA-BRAAA 16! and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court’ for said County; within the firstthree days ofisaid Term, and let said Defendant take notice if fu. they fail to answer to the said complaint withig that,time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this...2 2 +O leg. L Ae A Poh cbe Clerk of Superior Court County. ni—.egbul—.FaligA ROW’ CVOMMVUES Psi of 421734 40d SHOW 05 s01adng-3q3 Jo pf a1qeaINIea ay ° 3 Q = = o o < - SIY} BMI a1OJaq paequiosqns pu 0} TIOMS “suoyyndexe wos }duIexe Aysadoid pue sartiqety ‘siqep siq 2Aoqe pue 7240 SIBIJOp PeIpuny Om} Jo WINS 24} THOM Ss} aq shes uioms 3uleq e048 “Siq} ‘sjees pue SpueYy Ino SSIT}tM PHAre[_ 24} JO 9A0903 Aew JUBpaeyeg, 24}, SB.4809 BAL _ 949 Ff ‘9Aawnog jnEpaajed 943 ‘Ayunod yaunod ioyedng 243 U] \ ‘¥NITIONVO HLUON JO AL¥LS North Carolina Iredell County Grace Houpe,Plaintiff --VS-5 JR. Houpe,Defendant. To Honowrable B.F. “ong, Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District The plaintiff for motion in the above entitled cause moves that she be allowed such alimony pendosite lite es to your Honor, may be thought proper and reasonable, and as justifying her course in making said motion, offerg- to your Honor her affidavit ,as follows; State of North Carolinas Iredell County: Grace Houpe, affiant, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is the pleintiff in a certain agtion entitled Grace Houpe ageinst J.R. Houpe, now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, in which action plaintiff is seeking a divorce under sub-sections three and four of Section #1662 of the Revisal of 1908; that pleintiff hes filed her com- plaint in said action, a copy of which is hereto attached; that plaintiff is without any means of support whatever for herself and children, having nothing to subsist upon during the progress of said action, and nothing with which to defray the necessary and proper expenses of said action, and nothing with which to pay Counsel for bringing this action in her behalf. WHEREFORE, your petitibner prays that notice be served upon the defeniant, to show cause before Your Honor, at such time end place as your honor shall designate, after five days time Chin phot wel Ce athewed AY ate HerZr oo ry. Affiunot. fi Sworn to and/gubscri ore me is 30th day ,of Decem 913. | Mh TE BAG . taud ot | from the date hereof, whey North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1914. Grace Houpe,Plaintiff VS = Complaint. J.R. Houpe,Defendant. The plaintiff complaining of the defendant says: ~-First-- That the plaintiff married the defendant on the 3rd day of June,1896, in the County of Iredell and Btate of North Carolina. | ‘ --Second-- That to this union or marriage ,there has been born to the plaintiff and the defendant six children »five of whom are living, name and age respectively; here given Lillian Vienna 14 years of age; Teddie , eight years of age; Gledys six years of age; Don four years of age; and an infant about fifteen months ola. : --Third-- 4701 That prior to the day of June, the defendant without, any just cause had mistreated and abused the plaintiff by many acts of unkindness, cursing and other indignities, but on said ---- day of June,1911, without any provocation or cause whatever, either by word or act upon the part of the plaintiff, in the preeence of the children of the pleinotiftf oak the de- fendant, and the plaintiff's mother, the defendant violently, and unlawfully cursed the plaintiff, using vile and obscene language towards her and finally on said date assaulted and beat her with two lerge hickories or sticks until the same were worn out, inflicting upon her brugses and wounds serious to be borne. The vlaintiff averring that no resistance was meade by her. That since said date the defafdant has violently he ° z ~ 2 = > o @ < n i assaulted the plaintiff striking her, and upon remonstrance being made to him by their daughter, the defendant then and there assaulted his daughter. : --Fourth-- That before and since said time the defendant has by cruel and barbarous treatment ,endangered the life of the plaintiff and her children, offering such indignities to her person as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome. ~-Fifth-- That immediately after the assault upon her in which she was whipped and bruised with the switches or sticks above alluded to, the plaintiff applied to J.W. Houpe, a Justice of the Peace, Sor such process of lew as would protect her and rights, and prevent further essault and mistreatment upon the part of the defendant, intending at that time to bring an action for divorce from bed and board, and when the same was made known to the defendant, by entreaties upon his part and promises of future good behavior, becoming a husband and father, and the express agreement that he would not at any future time abuse mistreat or strike the plaintiff, the plaintiff was prevailed upon thereby not to institute any action against him, but has remained with her children in their home, trying at all times to perform the duties of a faithful and true wife and mother. That since said time and agreement upon the part of the defendant, not to strike her any more or abuse her in any way, the defendant has cursed her, threatencd her life, and assaulted her, and at the birth of her last child left her alone, declining to call a physician to come to her relief, and actually plowed in the field for many hours during her severe suffering at said time. That the defendant has become so fiolently abusive and threatening towards this plaintiff that she is fearful that he will not only assault her again ,with sticks, but that he will actually kill her and some, if not, all her children. ~-Sixth-- That the defendant is a man of property, being reputed to be worth from Ten to Twenty Thousand Dollars; that he is the owner of Three Hundred acres or more of farm land, exceedingly valuable, and has cash of considerable amount. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays Judgment; (1st) That she be Aoerep A mensa et Thoro from her seid husband: (2nd) ‘That she be Y given’ the custody of her children; (3rd) That she be awarded ‘alipony as to this Court may seem reasonable and her maintainance and that of her children‘while this action is pending, and for costs, inoluding a reasonablg Attorney's fee; (Ap aeydor such other and further relief, babe for Cobou z ate Grace Houpe, being duly sworn, says, that she has read as may be just and right « the foregcing Complaint; that the same is true of her own knowl- edge except as to those matters and things stated therein upon information and belief, and as to those she believes it to be _ Space Pioefe, Sworn to and bécribed before me —5A< “=e tnoze: — 8 Decerber,1913. ke i (ALR BL Laie Tpit Cle Pyoriacl ye true. qe+ mort dttow WTR Die 2 6” Ranem ly O = % ~ ~ ‘SA 20BID ‘odnoy vl6l nly ° 3 © 2 ° @ < 2) North Caroling Iredell County Grace Houpe,Plaintiff --VS-- J.R. Houpe, Defendant. eigen y a" ~ This cause com neon pbotoré ‘th unferasesc’. ‘upon metakn if for “alimony pendente~ eth. “as stated in the | ‘Reosths and Sethe + considered upon the atticavit ate Compras at fle@s ee \T ae It is ordered that fhe fefondant be and Dppredy. Mer Ore: W.F. io a. Harding »Judge of the Supentox, Court” ,at fg i at_4 o'clockP. yon the January’ ‘arn, ,1914, and show cause why such motion should not be granted. A copy of the affidavit and of the Complaint is ordered to be served on the defendant together with this notice,to the end that the defendant may answer game at Pie and place set out above. A mdipets feet Chel genclw the leacud he Sper) © 2 a?r- SAlby, 4. (O* Déet~. Lf A Ae ¢ Judge of Fifteenth Judicial DistricY Houpe, Grace vs. Houpe, J. R. 1914 Houpe, Grace vs. Houpe, J. R. 1914 oo © 3 |) 6 @ < ¥ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. OC. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ear ——— the defendant__. above named, it_Ae/_be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, dt a Court to be held for th ounty of on the: 4. .-Monday the the same being thew. day of which will’ be deposited in the offies of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first thre days of said |Term and let said Defendant take notice if_ (they fail- to answer -to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. qUBpPUaza(] 24} 8B Yoo ‘MOTj08 BI} UL ~~~ ~yuBpUezaq] 9y4 jsumby a10Jaq peqtiosq ns pus 0} UWIOMG oul mehaainieydrtcsnty ioe ia bmn Seam “TAA MO'Y “===-O7UN PUNOG SeAjesINO sFpe[MouyIV 9M “--=="10 WINS 9} Ul ‘fyunog | WNIIOMWO HLMON JO ALVLS { ae Aep-- ae he “‘s[Bos pues spuvy Ano Sssouql Ay Servpa ....f 8 pes Pas 191.57 _ pO £4 ( Lhe fs Sate ead a *‘SUOI}NVGXE WlOIF jdmexe Ajysodoid pue seatjiqer] ‘s}qoap Sty eAOqe pue JeAO “MOT}OR SIY} UL ~~~~~" YUU] ey} JO 1ea0001 ABU ~~~ ~~~ ay} YOM st ay Shes TAOMS Sutoq ‘punog sorsadng ay) Uy eee ee ee eg ee sors ~~" Sstqy UY yons [je ~~-"~~yuepuazeqy ey} Awd [peys---" ~~ S1B]jOop perpuny OM} JO WHS ‘pIoA aq 0} ‘srB[[Oq-- ~~ Plaintiff’s Attorney. Houpe, Grace vs. Houpe, J. R. 1914 jane) oo ec BF = © z oO a vi6l : $ ; j € £ ; s ; ? t ‘ ' } $ $ : i i. t ; i Fi ? Houpe, Grace vs. Houpe, J. R. 1914 ee ee ee en ne eo ee abe $ 1.00 Every copy of same . | Bond, including Justification IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. [Appeal from Justices Judgment Against | Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . ... . . | Docketing same sesiaeitdbesbdniplidhicsdenidertitenetsmareseateatpemenausreee CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) wine) Yo Lit ) livid Houpe, Grace vs. Houpe, J. R. 1914 3-15- 13-1M. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of... \PRE MLC County—GREETING: Wou are Hereby Commanded to summon - as ee es a 5B a Sl6l the same being wh Q Aas day of Oa fetes ee answer the complaint, a copy of i which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superigs Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant.........take notice 114™€2_. they fail to answer to the said complaint will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this... oe 0 of... =*Fa- ¥ Che c t L Clerk of sisal bai TAY within that time, the plaintiff “ z $ : ‘SA ByyRY ‘odnoy Sl6l YD VO} , to ¢ a 775 guna CH fa fy ' i ¢ ‘e 0} a[qeuinjoy © jinos fouadng 243 jo ty? > / Ja0TSa YOI SNOWNAS _ “Aau10},y s s jo Aep St} Sul a40J9q paquiosqns pur 0} TIOMS *SUOI]NSax9 WOIy }dmtaxea Aj19d01d Pue Sar}i[Iqet] ‘syqap SIY 9A0qe pue I3dA0 Si¥[]Op peipuny om} jo wins 94} 410M St dy shes HIOMS 8a1aq ([eag) (jeag) (1eag) 161 ‘q‘y jo Aep S14} ‘s[vas pue Spuey Ino ssaujziy “Gonoe $143 UI FYUIEIG 243 Jo. 1240901 Kem JEPUajed, 213 s¥-yso0 yons |e juBpuajaq] ay} Aed |yeys~ <a FNULelT 243 Ft “aaamoy *‘PIOA aq 0} ‘sIB[[oq jO Wns 34) UF ‘nOTj}OR siq} ua jepusjeq. ayy “OVaN punog saAjasino a8pajmouyoe any LSNIVOV (‘juno (‘¥NITON¥O HLYON 4O qL¥is ‘NOD soladng ay) uy e 3 F S16l ‘SA BypRYy ‘odnoy North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County October Term,1914, Martha Houpe, Plaintiff -VSs- COMPLAINT, Isaac Houpe, Defendant The plaintiff complains and alleges: --First-- That she and the defendant intermarried about twenty eight or twenty-nine years ago, in Iredell County, State of North Carolina, and to their marriage were born thirteen children, ten of whom are living; six of whom now reside with this plaintiff at her home in Bethany Township, Iredell County. The children so living with her are namea respectively, Clyde, Fred, Raymond, Ralph, Gilbert and Mildred Houpe, the young- est thereof being twins ana about the age of six years. That since the marriage ,and at all times thereafter the plaintiff was a faithful and dutiful wife , industrious anda de- Sirous of advancing the interest of her said husband and family. ~-Second-- That some years ago the defendant was the owner of a tract of land in Bethany Township, adjoining the lands of W.F. Coley, John Fox, and Miss Jane Sowers, and others, containing ten acres more or less, The plaintiff having become indebted to various parties, it became necessary to make provision for the payment of his debts, whereupon the defendant agreed with the plaintiff and Eva Houpe and Bell Houpe, two of their children, that if they would pay off and discharge the debt on the land aforesaid, that he would convey to them the said tract of land, and in compliance a0) ° S 8 F S16! ‘SA ByyRYy ‘odnoy : yf ~e therewith the plaintiff and her two daughters paid off said debts and took unto shomenlves the title to the land above described, which now constitutes the home of this plaintiff. --Third-- For many years prior to the filingof this complaint, the de- fendant has ill treated, abused, vilified and scandalized this plaintiff by accusing her of foul and injurious accusations often repeated, and for the past five years has withdram marital relations of intercourse with her caused by the mis-conduct ugon his part; that the defendant has accused this plaintiff repeatedly of infidelity on her part, all of which was untrue and continues so to befoul her name by false and injurious accusations that she can no longer live with him as his wife. That said conduct upon the part of the defendant has annoyed her, and been repeated so often as to become wilful and intentional upon his part, with the purpose to make her life grievous and hard to be borne. She therefore prays the Court to grant her a divoree from her said husband from bed and board, to give her the mstody of the children, now in her possession and under her control, and to grant unto her the free and absolute control of the property above described, to the end that her home may be one of quiet and peace, freed from foul and injurious accusations; where she can raise her children in the manner in which they should be raised without the example of such a parent over their young lives. Attorney for e ain ° Martha Houpe, being duly sworn, says, that the facts set forth in her complaint are tmue to the best of her knowledge and belief; and that said complaint if not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and her said husband, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and ee z e - S16l "SA ByRY ‘odnoy truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in said complaint as grounds for this divorce have existed to her knowledge for more than six months prior to the fil- ing of this complaint, and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the State for more than two years next preceding the filing of the Complaint. | Sworn _b0 and subscribed before me this o> day of -- Snows, 1914. a o ° = 8 : S16! ‘SA Bye ‘odnoy North Carolina : In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term, 19265. "rh Martha Houpe,plaintif?f siete, -“=VS-—< JUDGNUENT. Isaac Houpe, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before His Honor Thos. J. Shaw, Judge, and a Jury upon the whole record, and the jury having answered the issues as follows: 1. Did plaintiff and defendant marry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer; Yes. 2. Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answer: Yes. Se Did the defendant ill-treat, abuse, vilify and Scandalize the plaintiff by accusing her of infedelity and by such indignity render her conditinn intolerable and life burden- some? Answer; Kes. It is,therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff be divorced from the defendant a mensa et thoro, that is, from bed and board ,entitling the plaintiff toa leral separation from the defendant, her said husband. It is further adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff have the custody of the minor children, the off-springs of the marriage aforesaid. It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court. ) Mbit Judge Presifing. ve EN, an es 1 z 8 : Sl6l "SA BYR ‘odnoy and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Against Judgment Against Seseings Resteeey OF thee aengrans process, —e ‘ Every copy of same. . . Appeal from Clerk to Judge Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification . . Order of Arrest Subpoena, cach name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. ..... . Continuance Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing Issuing Commission ; Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment final in term time Judgment final befure_ Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . .... . Docketing same Docketing ex parte Proceedings Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual Transcript of Judgment Buweoution gud Sheriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00]]. Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when Jury impareled Referee's Allowance Consta Magistrate Plaintiff's Witnesses CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF GOSTS--GIVIL (As Fixed by the Code.) Houpe, Martha vs. Houpe, Isaac 1915