Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDivorce Records 1855-1913 Favell-Friese . North ,arolina Superior Court tredell Dounty May term 1899 _—< 6 ep es I j s E Favell, plaintiff. I I Va J Compla int. Ss. P. yavell, defendant. I The plaintiff complains and says; lst---- That she and the defm dant, S.P.Pravell were married on or about the 25th day of December 1887 and lived together as man and wife until about the 16th day of ,ovember 1896; that hhere was born to them and now living one child which child is under the care and control of this plaintiff. 2nd----That on or about the 16th day of wovember 1896 the defen dant, S.P.,avell without any cause or failt on the part of this plaintiff, abandoned her and has lived separate am apart from her from said time until the present, contributing nothing to the support of herself or child. Srd----That plaintiff is and has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two ye rs next before the bringing of this action or the filing of this Complaint and the facts set forth in this her Complaint have axisted for more than two years next preceeding the filing of this Complaint. Wherefore plaintiff demanis judgment; lat--- mhat the bonds of matrimony existing between herself and the defendant be dissolved ami that she be declared free from any and all responsibility by reason of the marriage aforesaid; that the custody of the child be declared to this plaintiff and for the cost of this action to be taxed as required by law. L.C.Caldwell, Atty. as sei S. E. Favell makes oath that the facts set forth in the foregoig Complaint are true as of her own knowledge, except those matters and things stated upon information and beleif and these she be leives to be true. /? of e Nr . Sworn to and subscribed beforpe.me.. 7 ope Rh ob oXae foes uetoe weet on this the | > of May 1899 S. FE. Favell plaintiff in this cause being duly. sowrn says that the facts set forth in this complaint are true to the best of her knowledge and beleif; that s&ad complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and her said hsband; not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the com- plaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint as grounds for a divorce have existed to her knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this camplaint; that plaintiff has been a resident of this State for more than two years next prior to the filing of this canplaint. 7} pl) Sworn to and subscribed before me ee. y MV ; eevee eeeter e*eeee eee this |S day of May 1899 ME hihi d 7 Basues | > | | C+ ras ow aCing 2€ b : as din Ace n Dee i Has pts L234. De as ; ; S ~ ; x Pavell, S. E. vs. Favell, S. P. s E. Partie bn Eka ee: ‘é yi oe mn bende ge ee Zo | 7 Zin. — ‘% ro — Ger rae i a es gilbnaiiicecnoed S ws wcll * ae, ne . ae, aa a. ee sam A ee ace, J ow $e — a baw DK, ae | - wuld is 2 fre FA G pauses eeae hes fimm Meo E Z< Arc E- — - is. oid 4G 9 | - ee ese ae Y2.-, Bae, WOMM Jf’ Pavell, S. E. vs. Favell, S. P. | a Ay J n~ of fru. Cl coax [SR Pave € s , Bet SL davrte, dage a ee aot Ate ford nn. Ai dcee ——_ Pe Ani Za st aigimaicnt_bte Salt | Ee ow Sarl, GRE on etn, 2g Lee Be op ae ied! doe eee Laie Lr | it L/ 2. 2 nee Grind, rete» pret he LERe 0}, Wn aatios, hs form Saw me OO [Pak Aiaf fine ar Me 7 Za ag Oe Me aah fon Des tiee CoS, At. Lied ag. Sia ppet Mee ; j . | 1S... aye -<) a7 <£e< a pre) , |\Zrar Ls eka oe Ae litle Matesirtl, Ge HE LANDMARK One Year, $2.00 Six flonths, _1.00 CALDWELL & CLARK, PROPRIETORS. PF Pee PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FE Yuk t/ ‘hh Aatuty Facet v7. fart, G nas | Melesull OOK gt EGE! a | HE LAN DMARK, DR. | Advertising Rates One Year, $2.00 Furnished Six flonths, _1.00 CALDWELL & CLARK, Proprietors. ” on Application. i Three S, .50 , 4 PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. bs | 7 “ Bax 47 Te Actity Dactth v7. farce, @ Jee | : ’ E ‘4 . nas lay Bw Boom og Me Cor Ozer. KM fhwre , JE tiwig tun, > ee law °C L.4—~~s gl owe bie vetiwtee. Precvn-a ven. a” ine tees Dot. ee = Lo, oO oo__-* laA-e Art . Atfue—-t 22>. af --= atta a+ £474 f= Bilin amy > asa, At ie em 1 eric ptnateicemnisntte, ain oe .j rn —_~Te Gr ae a, A213 d °S "TI@Aey “SA a °S “Tleaeg Pavell, S. E. vs. Favell, S. P. Pavell, S. E. vs. Favell, S. P. Arey, ‘19)su19,] ‘SA UOT] “Ja}sUNID,y S16! the same being the he, of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the ec ourt for said County, days of said Term; and let sai@Defendant... take notice if< hey fail to answer to the said complaint within that fine, the plaintiff... “Si apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge «Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C, 6-9-’09-1M, ese a lll County.-- $n the Superior Court, : \ 4 tr NSS iT Ss px Ve. = 3 ti State of Ng th Carélina, | 2 “ .| we To the Sheriff of County—GREETING: £4 | Dou are hereby Commanded to semen. So Hh Aezeceh~ SiG Tplges sug broht earnestness tesa the defendant. above named, rr fa be found within your to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be’ held for the County of. gf the rt House ‘i in 1 LN LE rhe Ae on the. Z ¢. iced Moiidaty “ahter a Monday of .) Uiaro hk a 1A and answer the complaint, a copy of within the first thiée Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. 1 H04 SHOWWAS 50} aiqeamniay yNoD sopedng 343 jo ry ty iy ~ Arey, “19)Su19.] 5 B | DB S i ; 5 | 2 wR: = mn a ' 7 Sl6l 4 of 3 ) —rrereeceenemauaa OU a10Jaq pequiosqns pue 0} TIOMSG *suOI]NOexs wi0Iy 3dutexe Ajsodoid pure sartiqet] ‘s}qep SsIy aAoge pue 12A0 SI¥[JOp pexpuNy O43 jo UINs 943 yWOM st oy Ses MIOMS BuIaq™ yo hep sry. ‘S[eas.pue Spey Ino ssouztT “JIULe[g 24} JO 12A00e1 Aevum JUBPUIZeG 91} SB 3S09 yons [Te oo EBT ONY JE aAaaKoy juepusseq eq) ‘proa aq 03 ‘sre]]0C7 —“—="“OA TT DUNO SPA[ISINO ISpa;MOUAIE 3/4 LSNIVOV ‘Ayanod ‘yunod s0pedng 343 U] \ ‘¥NITIONVYOD HLYON JO SLYLS North Carolina I In the Superior Court | Iredell County . January Term,1916. Leon Feimster, Plaintiff --VS-~ § 6.037 2 .3e, Mary L. Feimster,Defendant. ) The plaintiff complains and says: — es That about three years ago, in Statesville,N.C., he and hy ory the defendant married and lived together for a short time Oo oO a a as man and wife. ss ~ S a Within a short time after the mrriage aforesaid, the © plaintiff because of the alleged conduct of the defendant se- wn parated himself from her, and has not within the past two years lived with her as man and wife or otherwise. cdi aide That the défendant committed adultery with one Alfred Jones, of some other person to this plaintiff unknowm, and about a year ago became pregnant, on or about the --- dayof August,1914, and gave birth to eae child, which child is not the off spring of this plaintif?f. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands judgment, that the bonds of matrimony existine between himself and the defendant be dissolved; that he be freed and discharged from all claims which this defendant may have against him, by reason of Arey ‘1ojsuria ‘SA UOT “JO}SUIID.J SI6l the marriage aforesaid, and for such other and further relief as may be just and right. Attorney or L EE Leon Feimster, being duly sworn says, that the facts set forth in his complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and his said . wife), and not for the mere purpose of being freed and ipacated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in said complaint as grounds for this divorce have existed to his knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this complaint, and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the State for more than two years next preceding the fili of the Somplaipt. vVr2. ' Pr 9 a ‘ v . a * ie Sworn to and subscribed before me this ZX ay of October,1914. Aley| “194SUII9.] "SA UOT “I9}SUIID.J S16l North Carolina 4 In the Superior Court Iredell County j January Term,1915. Leon Feimster, Plaintiff { To | ISSUES. Mary Feimster, Defendant. 4 --First-- Did the lpia smbaee and defendant marry ae al- leged in’ the Complaint? : pee shower: | Ye ig — ~-Second-- Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: Yy bd --Third-- Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State for two years next preceding the institution of this action? Answers (/{U | Mary Feimster, Defendant. 4 4 Sand oh "Sr ft So Lhe < Le SF Ne a a ee i For oo i 4 tress f ow wht aw SS \ ‘ Pitney ne Beni NS. Siac Sner eben Feimster, Leon vs. Feimster, Mary 1915 es CPE teed Leet Goat he deel Gf Gat Cororecxge Lok ta Peccee Bed age depp ewer: ag cc Pocce : QS Fetes dese Paecea oles, C2 peace 2A. a a Sacer, 2gC 1 fee ’ Boby Atece bee Z4e i 1 Gina pits alee 296° 2kect eet: Box he eh Meas ga. da Cak tix mtreloe ects. bis few ano — Ate aredinm Sbapurien Oden Fate) 62-200) 568" ards Ha Aboud’: Oe te eva a? gt > ami. sll ar a alee le a a “lI2Awe Lhe ill aancal ae aa LOT Pirciclatll OP istg f* Ghee: a Wears, re ow (> pee. p- one. ae hihe: tddinainsd unwell: ia a Lo} lao PONE lei ope Cardy He Matt acid Leticia ae die ag nied Ofeut.— hk. gennall mm: Foe Qh yuo tfeadk,~ tieey Liusid ees athe oes Or cide dene | bene Get tema ge ae Gli ~ Leer by Arurteriae Giaae te abasic. | Lat-Hee. pee: Re bin: y ‘eke Jb4 ome ent Z ao K ok de Qi. aolt a F Roe ge 4 Qc ct2-4 el Zo b" 4 je es Si Z ea joe “es Bo 2lZZ. { J? fe fi | 22200, Lv p22-03k a a Oe a a. W4e/ pO IOP JA fo veg eect ek oe KC - terete Jo Cove "tf 5 i } ZL he Ort, At Le) all, g api <> losis Sa ale A gi eis mae hs, fe 4h pave ethane I *y SuouuPouTy "SA I *y ‘aouueouty HeLa wey: + OL4.2 id ie Meh tia ng, Teg ee. 2th ee ae ee Dini oe a heer — Rie ol et ae Keg ae Ori He, AcOrvive dk a Sete or fle b a7, i ob Pes ee cack: oo mie 20 tie, Afr z sensei slice un, te. Av Sn ee wk 4d to fs7te BA-re-1 satay Mind, Lie Last— | | pee Be, sie a se: cr Oz ee a Dg bezectokhel ie feanle Mi fee tice aaa! Aide fp tia Cc boil G2-P3242++- Meacaty Cie Yn it~ ap+.t- Lu, Part AE S82 es ae = 2 LALr+0 tial. LA ae ee edi Lo. oN hg i J ZY ; ; or a as v7? G&G *« o— L4 — ~~ / a a/ C7 6-2-4 C4 ame ~<. Midis, ital e we: 424-4 Ca, aoc ie a ang es O-y>Ae ae > wee ei thie, f 4 thot fbi vane Li 4 ‘ 2428.2 Ze ao te lst trie, , ss ee Zo ; 4 ae f He ‘ , ee o Ok a 2a 426 c AZ nertnes C ZL 4 a4-4.. S217 232027770 the Shan pebirs, 224 Cae iy oe. 3 de Aonvag 2. » ZAAL adhltxs eine. - c p22 41--O¢ hy bate |\Zrv. Sa Fe CO 14-4 o (a Dp ype. - fo ee. aes C4 ee J, Rael, oe ae tA -L7 a att ce Lee ofa food At” Lor Pia Prades Fae a= Jie f 1 a-y. tee ! Ze ~ Levaenitticaspid 2202)> tats Ly. 42 ¢t2027 ee a z on Aa itu neds * a, ° x ee hee POLs2 es AKO! a Ae hes 4 i Low C4 pe 7 a 7 26M Atte, ALia SNES SET in ee Sma ei eAgpherne taemoatene AURA POE 8, aaron eee . tA? eae ‘ 2 mn a 1 Aw Cee te tyes wet gece ge : a [Zorn net Wie ae " ane . * aust 7 bee ier | ete eo: so ateapge a of lan hae! | tha je 6A L arco eS AL aD tfc: Lu ) — ype teeta Ya Ly. 222022 ho Biheanel Le Cees: ice a oe ame aise: Abvagford. for "Zt a- ne SY Prr0r ber £6 pannadetl! Ca- be ea oy Ate Gree ae ee Ae la kai) | ae ce a — ARE C-2P2r AK at Rete cs ot Zee i ea Phot: —-. a Santtienthe otf Pe ee \F 4e< act Bint, Cita yrer ‘tind V ea <x = ol Yr oad ie < os Lo rg Z PM pu+tte C6 Y 4 tarp ony a 7) ‘ Fratton ‘ae forty \ A>. 4 Oa initia. 42 ele LE nee ~ PRACT C Ory 4-4 te es Ut» Care LAG (ges z iis ~ - Z Cs... mnie Jz Aa-iule tly a gf" H.,: “ Fmt 934-O-442 iC PO AER, tg ae = ——_ —_—. 4 Cnet mage Ms ES os At A hge oo kag oy Ome) Act 4 han ee Pray Aw Os en wl K_, aa are Auaeanor : > ZOE is i ‘3 pH LLLE, ess 25 fe 4, Peas Arey ne =e PLiuat Olt Sh Zé, of. itn. Calc oue | | | - Ao—-c a0 th ae ae 27 = | LorE TPE. ao Tt ae 2 a ey en — Ble Sel tanh pe Jotrresrer eer he tr ade y j-Pheatre -f Zo Mab2le Leced ne SiS de a al iw nyt beg Aen even | ove | Gamal A lang ttn te, | led se 2 oo ea Pe Zap~etaly cant. Li en , ———, —_——— y : Cea = ’ ‘ Afr albert §f Feo eS a | a Jb lepsa00c Z nae , | 4 *T °y SuouUuPoUTY "SA *T *y ‘uouueouty : m= NORTHOAROLINA. $19 <ypertorQour A. L, Pincannon vs, R. L. Fincannon. Action for divorce. It Speeseing to the satisfaction of the couit | that the defendant, R L. Finecannon, is a non- resident of the State of North Our. na, the said defendant is hereby notilied to be and ap- _| pear before the jedavot our Superior Court at a court to be held at the court house in States- ville on the 4th Monday before the lst Monday in September, 1885, and answer to the com- plaint, a copy of which will be aepoesited by | plaintiff in the offiee of the clerk of Superior \ i Court for said county, within :he. against him as asked forin the said complaint. J.B CONNELY, © s-« fiwaltney, attorney. 4? July 3, '85—6t. é Oe Udit afiel’ wand fits: three ‘| days of said term. or judgmant will be 'aken 5 5 | etarill, 4. CC, Kap VESI~ te CME DA | de SillauaeV | ed basicege | : | Yee Mpgoeh odevedconat | ta Me Koid ot’ fFlunting oY Cat taal dihnent., q a fa an fis 3 4. OCaedathl bud ORTH CAROLINA, InEDELL County, A_L. Fincannon vs, R. L. Fincannon. | Action for divorce. It uppearing to the satisfaction of the court wi Ge. | that the defendant, R L. Fincannon, is & non- Caled LC — santo SEE I ~ resident of the State of North Our. lina, the said defendant is hereby notified to be and ap- pear before the judge of our Superior Court at a court to be held at the court house in Stutee- ville on the 4th Monday before the lst Monday in September, 1885, and answer to the com- fin Superior Gourt .) plaint, a copy of which will be deposited by plaintiff in the office of the clerk of Superior Court for said county, within :he firs! three days of said term. or judgment will be taken against him as asked forin the said complaint. J.B CONNEI YA Ss att val attorney. ee : HGF. / seem (GUC , Giandena i Mewspafp htt’ nd foe inting Csabte shnendm awe * MD WY Md Fd Cauca V. pdb A 4 YX ge - We dno adeelidcncat ln fr frig ua Me Raid 4 Oaeduell bust Mey Pg | *T °y SuouUuPoUTY "SA *T *y SuouuPouTy lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally RTH CAROLINA, ‘ . OFS CAReE IA bin Superior Court |) A. L. Fincannon vs, R. L. Fincannon. : Action for divorce. E It appearing to the satisfaction of the couit oe Le _ C, pi : | that the defendant, R L, Finecannon, is a non- Vales “zt —— RTO ACA IN St SEES resident of the State of North Our. lina, the said defendant is hereby notified to be and ap- pear before the judge of our Superior Court at a court to be held at the court house in Stutes- ville on the 4th Monday before the lst Monday in September, 1885, and answer to the com- plaint, a copy of which will be aeposited by plaintiff in the office of the clerk of Superior Court for said county, within :he fits! three days of said term. or judgment will be taken against him as — forin the said complaint. 4) J.B CONNELY,0 5. - Aiwaltney, attorney, ¢ a nae K. y seme One Kand male Mewspapier wand fol ftintine Cy CG Malle. ihement * wane * +. Tt dd PileaunaeV ped lavtegre bl © t Jf ay Ne tuyed eaevliasncal Ane (term, Kvscbedey he Kade “IT *y SuouUuPoUTY "SA *T *y fuouueouTty >t Oa cht | py, Th ta, ‘ Sa ee Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL County, A L. Fincannon ws, R. L, Fincannon, Action for divorce. It appearing to the satisfaction of the const HY Ve, _ € | that the defendant, R L. Fincannon, is a non- Vales “zt Ls —_—— ppihinit ined ieccanctaaeuaidins saploeateaeitade ASSES ma resident of the State of North Our. lina, the ; In Superior Court said defendant is hereby notified to be and ap- pear before the judge of our Superior Court at a court to be held at the court house in Stutees- ville on the 4th Monday before the lst Monday + in September, 1885, and answer to the com- plaint,a copy of which will be aeposited by plaintiff in the office of the clerk of Superior Court for said county, within :he fits: three days of said term, or judgment will be 'aken against him as asked for in the said complaint. J.B ape rey 4 st ear: Gt 00 Hy Alb ale Aes afith’ and fol , f4 uUntling Establihiment, penis Yt Md Well Cauarne’ U4 4d Cartdegeel © ad eave in i ia ua Su Kodayiasr, > f Oneal Ouiohe *T °*y fuouUPoUTY “SA “T °*y ‘uouuPeouTy lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ORTH CAROLINA, IREDELL County, | A L. Fincannon vs, R. L, Fincannon. | Action for divorce, i cde snp re . It appearing to the satisfaction of the court HY, fe Y/ CC ‘ that the defendant, R L. Fincannon, is a non- € Caled welle, vf )e Z resident of the State of North Osr. lina, the said defendant is hereby notified to be and ap- pear before the judge of our Superior Court at u court to be held at the court honse in Stautes- ville on the 4th Monday before the lst Monday + l/ / in September, 1885, and answer to the com- e ° , plaint, a copy of which will be geposited by f “ f plaintiff in the office of the clerk of Superior . Court for said county, within che firs! three days of said term. or judgment will be taken against him as asked forin the said compl: vint. J. B CONNELY, 1 8-4 ii sari See Bh Liddle : In Superior Court SEE I~ Aews/e Vapitl’ and fel G4 uUnling Citallishment a Birsen® ® a. 5 a ey Oh kd. wt L975 Athyn Vo wt Ad latitig eH © a Nee duyoved dase dooeal lan (ren, fry Wily ua Mn Korie My, OCaed (eel bud Mh os| \. | } | | 22 ae + *I *y SuouUuPoUTY "SA *T *y SuouuRoUTY Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Ped Ao frcore Lti2- Ch h _t2t09«7 ; Ce Lk Af ti 9 a2. 9 “tH Cee BCE ar iets ; cd Ae toe Gy Oren Lh at By dnd Cpu theo fUucetG po po fit Vere Wed: ems “al A thet f pra cue eee ek pe - bce @ PODS SS ult ME Le Akers Kat Het fiterpor ir~ay FZ gr (lit2rH at ber & oe ae ee Aus Le297-C ArLecw alt ae Lec? Comey Colo) eee, ey 2 2 fre fre tint tan re : 4 Gtx ws Ch ¢ Cov t C21 then n~1 a Coed Piya ae S Ares es hoy Ties te lry 2 Paael Nerctiaeens: "SA °O “WR fuemsedsty euorydos Sueuredsty ee ge: J CPi... Cete Meg i, aa Ca A a ee Oe Fee a PA 6 Lae Seu Fie fue go PAY Aveeno | (Jai cer Covec eet th Cane gene le. x. aes 212 Cle, tte 1h coe Doery afta te "oO “WH fuemredsty SA euorydosg ‘uemredsty } 0 “i supusredsty “SA guoiydog ‘uemsedsty oo yess fies: a i A, £2 yt Eps We eo Act gered A Mh A Ua tdfrer- ebus: ea ; bee ety IC fur Ft tc oe 444 t1t4U LE LOd Mian oar litt eo Ar fer. 90. av Kavee> a. eto + iin kee oe (Tb. Pe Pees th CO Ry eS: Sine DO my peng Wat Te Canes’ Petfenrrnn fa | ae ae WG rcKa Uurctuc? G Lheg 20a, > | Drie Sk ce We eet bp fercs fer Te Sha ey | G FH nutes Cmimarnbeui, hin le appear | A Gn21ehaAnuay Cridy Meee Boke AOD. per Lh nis g Teciee es 2y Lh Coo Pcie ut LL tet C Uh ODA nimGuy fe. Fhe et Siete Ce A wee fev teifistr “y bee ao % d w . = r euoiydes ‘uemredsty “SA “4 % : g 3 3 & te of Worth’ Caroline, } . County. WE, the Subscribers, do jointly and severally bind ourselves, our Heirs, Executors and Ad- ministrators, in the sum of test es ee. . to be paid to fn hoe Att htt ae Heirs, Executors, Administrators or Assigns. he above Obligation to be void on-Condition that Af frgr« . do prosecute a.certain suit brought in the a a annie Meine for the county aforesaid, where the t said tata cs Plantiff , against Spr age oe fm AeaZ ee Defen- dant , and in case of failure, shall pay the said ~ / CPi ein ot gh aC such costs and damages as may be awarded against the said fo fhe. Pe ce sas by the Court having cognizance thereof. Vv Witness our hands and seals, the Q 4—~ dao 6 C614. A. D. 18 re WITNESS, Lz. } Md mr. Se ees Grace nen Fisperman, Sophrona vs. Fisperman, M. 0. ith LEDELS S gos Atl biren BS = 7 set Be a Le foeie t- Dao PP Cima Pb. eS A221 Me [On a2eor? Ces SS, : ee aE Ie _ gracd Lefer fx ie ~~ AS fr Le tecn | SL ? Zhe fon o¥ Crr2efCecee Ad E2ac Sf? Saw Qnr1-nLty frre CCF a shapes ae ZT. Maciek emeiaieei oO ‘e *SA -O *W fueuredst yi euoiydeg ‘ueusedsti Fisperman, Sophrona vs. Fisperman, M. O. seg ‘sIamoy.y ‘SA UNI “SISMOTT [Il6I SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Qa Athteays Lip. son thei: J =* onday after the. Z o=..Monday of County--GREETING : $ Dou are hereby CaynssandeD to summon.: @ ELM, Ahabird the defendant... above named, if... ake: be found within One be and appear before the Judge of eee at the Court House i in the same being the ae + May of. a . 1p , anid answer the complaint, a copy of t which willibe déposited in the office of the Clerk & the Superior Court for said! County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if SA grey. fai to answer to the said complaint Within that time, the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. py Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the ounty of Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this... Log ee Ag LL. si : AVA HA pe Aid: -™ Clerk of ee Leet € D then AQT €KOMMUe 4 © ce pe ‘ AVVO WOMVGAHG Bhi WY —- hue 312g “SIOMOTJ "SA UNIE ‘SIOMOTJ L16l ' ms ' y So oS @ : "Jo ynoz) s01edng eq} jo he Yi, ~~O} d[QeaAnyoy =i a) we i = |. XS : TS 3 \ SS 5 , oy) A 22 7S aes ft ; See 5s om © SF \ — ve A sti x aS Srnarerepnerereceereeseererenaeceerens *- jo &kep™ avereseceraceceone “SIY} am a10jaq peqiiosqus pue oO} aIOMS *‘sMOI]NIeXe woIy }dutexe Ajzodoid pur sarzi[Iqei] ‘syqep sty aAoge pue 13A0 SI¥[[Op pasypuny OM} JO UNS 94} YOM st aq SAes UIOMS BuIEq™ (‘1e9S) ~ _ (1898) © (‘{eag); yo Aep> SIq}.‘Sjvas pue spuey Ino ssenzI Ay er cecerccsces 61 ‘d 'y "MOI}O8 SIG} Ur “Hyarerg Wy} jo s9A0001 Ae JUBPHEZEG 24} SB }S09 yons {pe juepuajag oy) ded jpeys “PET ayy jt aAamoy ‘gepalaniag ‘kauHOGsT MI Tayi or tint rt ronson san JO Wins ay} ur ‘uoIRjDe sIqy Ur 4yUepUsjeq 24} “““OJUN PUNO sedjasINO aBpe|Mouye 9M LSNIVOV jas ‘yanoD sOLIedNg 94} UT | ‘WNITONVO HLYON dO AL¥LS seg “SIOMOT.J "SA UNI ‘SISMOT.T [Il6I Order of publication. North Carolina, Iredell County. Jim Flowers, vs. Bettie Plowers. SRST SEER action, that be found in be found in the fendant, wife abandoned ultry with aintiffr. rt is therefore ordered, a newspaper published title Iredell County and the defendant to appear at Iredell County to be and answer or demur to This the 1B ony of April 1911. held on the the In the Superior Court, It appearing from the affidavit of Jim Flowers Bettie Flowers in this the defendant therein is not ‘eto purpose of the the term complaint CY2 Clerk of t state and it further appearing that of the plaintiff had wilfully and without the plaintiff anda after said abandonment lived one Luther Feimster and others unknown to cannot after due diligence the de- cause in ad- the pl- that notice of this action be published once a week for four weeks in the Landmark, in Iredell County, setting forth the of the action, the same and requiring of the Superior Court of of the plaintirr. e fourth Monday in May 1911 seg “sIaMmoy.y ‘SA UNI “SISMOTT [l6I Service by publication ~-Affidavit. North Carolina, Iredell Sounty,. In the Superior Court. Jim Flowers, vs. Bettte Flowers, SR SESS SRR SR Jim Flowers, being duly sworn, deposes and says: that in the above-entitled action now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell Gounty, the Sheriff of said county has returned the summons issued to him endorsed * Bettie.Flowers.is not to be found in Iredell County":- that the defendant therein cannot afte er due diligence be found within the state; that a cause of action exist against the defendant in favor of the plainti= ff as follows: The defendant and Plaintiff were married on or about a day of fauna, LieyY 5 onor abe out the i. “day of fee ae pg defendant wilfully and Without cause abandoned the plaintiff and sénce that time Luther Feimster has lived in adultry with one -e°rs and others un» known to the Plaintiff, wherefore the said plaintirr prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of summons be made on the said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell a N. 0. Vist blew ” Dated this QB Seis of April wae Subscribed and Sworn to before me this pay of April 1911. LA ene of the Superior Court. al}eg “SIOMOLJ "SA UIE ‘SIOMOLF [l6l Service by publi¢ation ~-Affidavit. North Carolina, Iredell Gounty,. In the Superior Court. . Jim Flowers, vs. Bettte Flowers, SRS SESE ARSE Jim Flowers, being duly sworn, deposes and says: that in the above-entitled action now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell Gounty, the Sheriff of said county has returned the summons issued to him endorsed * Bettie Flowers is not to be found in Iredell Gounty":- that the defendant therein cannot aft- er pee diligence be found within the state; that a cause of action exist against the defendant in favor of the plainti~ ff as follows: The defendant and Plaintiff were married on or about a day of Jaennes Lieoy ; onor abe out the jn day of Fee ie oe defendant wilfully and without cause abandoned the plaintiff and stnce that time Luther Feimster has lived in adultry with one cers and others une known to the plaintiff, wherefore the said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of summons be made on the said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell — N. CG. Sind foot Dated this = ae of April sine Subscribed and sworn to before me a this My day of April 1911. of the Superior Court. a19g ‘sIaMO].J ‘SA UIE ‘SIOMOTJ [l6I Herth Carelina, In the Superier Court. Tredell County, May Term 1911, Jim Plewers, ; | Plaintiff, ; vss ; Bettie Plewers, ; The plaintirr Complaining ef the defendant alleges: First: That the Plaintiff and defendant were married on er x About the 7s day ef fee -7 190 Y¥» in said ceunty ana State and since that time have been, and new are husband and wife. Secend: That en er about the LI day ef BateKZ i010 the defendant disregarding the Selemnity ef the marriage vew, wil- fully and witheut cause deserted and abandenea the plaintiff and has since then and Still centinues ge te wilfully and witheut Cause desert and abandon tae said plaintiff and te live separate and apart fron him, witheut Sufficient cause er reason. Third: That after the defendant wilfully and without cause deserted the plaintiff, as above stated she lived in adultry with one Luther Feimster and other persons unknown to the plaintiff, Fourth: That the Plaintiff has not received the defende= ant in conjugal embraces Since she abandoned him as above stated, Fifth: That the plaintiff has been a bona fide resid- ent of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceeding the institution of this action, Sixth: That the facts herein contained and set forth as & complaint, have existed to the knowledge of the plaintirr for more than six months next preceeding the instituion of this action; wherefore the Plaintiff demands Judgment against the defendant, that he be granted an absolute divorce from LU aeg ‘SIOMOLJ “SA WIE “SIOMOL J [1l6I the bonds of matrimony with the defendant. Jim Flowers, being duly sworn deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and the defendant and not for the purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but, in sincerity and truth for the. causes named in the complaint; that the facts set forth in this complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to his knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint and that the plaintiff has been a resident of this the complaint. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the MO =a05 of CCfe 1911. ourt. <a yO ee OR I ft ena : | | } : } \ oman tt te eC viiastshoe ee Flowers, Jim vs. Flowers, Bettie 1911 siog “SIOMOLJ SA Ulf ‘SIOMOLJ — \O — — Flowers, Jim vs. Flowers, Bettie 1911 seg ‘sIaMoy.J SA UII ‘SISMOT.J [161 PERE, TRATIREMeTPee Emo crue ANRY ee Pye terre iy Seep ae ; ° Bill of Coste—Civil.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. IN THE SUPERIOR courr,|:2 A Appeal from Clerk to Judge County. | | Order for enlarging time of pleading | Interlocutory Orders } | Attachment, Order in | Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian . ide | i Continuance | Judgment Against Notice, for each name over one in same paper. | Impaneling Jury | Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . ] Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk y ee Judgment | | Fi E 17 Transcript of Judgment | Hxccution ha Sheriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00 Rie Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when Jury impaneled Referee's Allowance .. ... . . # oa ¥ Ae CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL. | (Aa Fixed by the Code.) Ox web x \ Flowers, Jim vs. Flowers, Bettie 1911 er [e-. as preted je ~f 4 a ae Se <o~ [RANA ES tp og a 7, 23 hee Ch Zee omcl \Ke Ata 2g eo feo a 8 ee a) Tere Ke fact et fH 1 KH 4£~- Lagat ei, Se [> LOSS RS Weise EF ¥ 2S a f= KEP E AME bart Pi . AC f Ct | Pr oo FP ped. or Mee Lk, Die ae. Ka; a <<, (AEST Prey, See « it on Zao f<a<e aK yer aan, Ck f C ho aise - : pF ok ae of ort CG Tf — ee. J ig LA 4 he r AO. ober ape y ne lan Kak eat Gaifhita cK Merck | | — Pred. otk yg Crib ecthiwin | Lin 4 at ean Tee | Fee Lame ALt nt fe Mare | efKarmey (2 a. He ne aie ine 2 a Lae poo Caf Lox, “Cherg| . , y 2 eealaalll df "a uYop ‘zeuzI0g “SA f19uyIOg | is? | | iz fe . d ~ RD v2 4 ~ “H wyor ‘zeuqzog "SA : ATFT ‘aeuzt0g — a ec po 7 " wit fees ae, eee pode 734 Ls eT ig > pate Oe we ‘i. it dh cone FC aatadiiQiac fKeokh ZH mee Cig ee | Cf Ane 24e> 7a cae. Uae cat - Act. cz ae Az ri ee a es ane —Desnitaicaniiaiia bs ~AG—3+-e, 1, “Dte. CF abe ae Prez pot Ail ain Dig Loc AY. Gece a” ae | eeilintinee eee” i ~~ "a uyor ‘zeuqz0g i icee dns os De hey Meu thes Zi th ns oe (he; ? Ly, Len D445 fe Pes FTO a4 Ko ake Br | La. COMM: LUA AA CALC he a ‘i Be ee e hePee } He EC MVeck ede ” o o J “ sceat LE. Lin. ro @U a hee Te hy uch toons f Bec ent? G—te a Pte se) we @ i OM LPB I hon a GA) ’ Se ee ae “Sat of a Be i ‘Galina, a WE, Tu Susscrisers, do doiutly and severally County. bind Ourselves, our Heirs, Executors, and Ad- Iennenneeanneneetncees nase ewnensensecen: silbbatiars ts in the sum of _ igo A pee - Dollars to be paid to : hee. nm | Heirs, Executors, Administrators or hnaeca The above Obligation to be void on Condition ee a Pes do prosecute a certain suit brought in the Superior Court for the county aforesaid, where the said ig Plaintiff on Defendant , and in case ot iy shall pay the said a Le ewe. such costs and deibthdie as may be awarded against the said (9 . Ce 7 by the Court having cognizance thereof. Wirvess our hands and seals, the iy day of ae} ct WITNESS, oe Z Z Fox, D. C. vs. Fox, E. -. ying ‘OZ30L] SA “A "W ‘2z0014 616I SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Stategville, N. C. Iredoll County—lIn the Superior Court. a en ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ae ee ee ee ee eee MV. Preese.. Binns ts AGAINST oeetag Ruth Bréene, defendant... mes { 4 te t se foe eee ooo See é cera ne ee ee ee State of North Corolina. | Te he Sheriff of ---Teedsi Pe County-GREETING : YOU ARE HERESY COMMANDED to'vemghdn i. We te mr Se fd sd reo BUR NER i i . o y } oe ee eg ae ae gin tana el naman einem tanienin mathe eeu eteiateieneteeneret cima pte ppl i dn ccnp nies nigh rte SE anata ts wm wise tae the defendant... above named, ifS/1€__be found within your County, to be and appear before the per ss at the Court House in our Superior Court, lag ¢-Oourt to be’ or the County of..Iredell Bt oe --Stotesville___.on the. 8th apie: selec ebehathiyeg November . - the sanie being the..J_...day of _-AS2 S22es - --198.-., and answer the complgint, PyfPRy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, WiliitdBeifinks’. thbR Gad be BAL Tha tla ERP Befdhidinte? + Piake notice if.._she _ thay fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff----- will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof. fail not, and of this summons-make due return. tiven under my hand ‘and seal of said Court, this2Sra2Qd@ay of 2Octaba } ; i 40 ILVLS Za S}qep sIq vA0GB pue J9A0 = VNIV'IONMNVO HL LIEF. Returnable ta LOY a. Derm, 191-F7- _ of the Superiér Court ot ese County, SH 7~ wt 04} Jt ‘taaemoy } UT “WOO” 8143 UT ---~uBpuezed on) 143 ‘s[%es pue spuvy ano sseuyT Ay . z TAO Avur ~~~ ~~ [Yepuezod ey} se Js00 2 ¢ a7 ati > 7 oe, ZEA Punog seajesimo eSpejmouyow oy "‘RiGNOO "~~ eee ASB" S@ SET Om er0goq poquiosqus puw 0} wioMmg ‘uonow sty ur “===--gneteg oy puezoq ay) Avd reys-- Fg Se ee ee aR 5 = Se = = > a ~ = = so 3 o Ss ® 3 % © * ® B =| oe > S B ® ” ® @ = co a4 So = a ‘jsnog sorsadng ay) uy sa Acne eee Yak a 0} aa awe “Be 61~------------ Magnan -- 70 yons [[@ ~----~ju08 S1B[[Op Perpuny OM} Jo Ns 94} YOM st oy S{¥s TIOMS Zurq ~----~S> (*[BOQ) ----n nn nnn ---o--=---- 4-45 -------- *PIOA eq Plainfiff’s Attorney. Freeze, M. V. Freeze, Ruth North Curolina Superior Court ' qiny ‘ezse17 ‘SA “A ‘W ‘0z2017 Iredell County October 23rd 1919 6161 M. V. Preeze, plaintiff. : : Ve Complaint. Ruth Freeze, defendant. iL The plaintiff complains and says; First. That he was born and raised in Iredell County, State of North Gar- Olina and is a resident and eitizwn thereof, Second. That he and the defendant were married on November 18th 1917 ana lived together as man and wife until he was galled to the colors and entered the service of his Country and embarked for over- seas. Third. That the defendant committed afultery with one Williams, during his absence overseas and in service. wu. Wherefore he parys; that the bonds of matrimon existing between himself and the defendant be dissolved and he be free ana discharged from any and all responsibility and liability by reason of the marriage aforesaid, and for such other and further releif as may be just and richt. Counsel for plainti??. M.V. Preoze being duly sworn says; that the foregoing Complaint is true of his ovm knowledge except as those mtters and things statea therein upon information and as to those he beleives it to be true. Sworn to ind subscribed before me this the 23rd day of Oct 1919. qiny ‘ezse17 ‘SA “A ‘W ‘ez001] 6161 cH x M. V. FREEZE BEING SWORN SAYS: That the facts set forth in the complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; that said plaintiff is not made out of levity and collusion between himself and the defendent, his wife, and not for the mere purpose of being freed ond parteaé from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint- that the facts set forth as grounds for divorce have existed for more than six months prior to the filing of the complaint, and that plaintiff has been 4 resident for more than two years next proceeding the filimg of the complaint. Sworn to and subscribed before me, October 23rd., 1919. Yiny ‘ezae17 ‘SA “A ‘W ‘9z001] 6161 North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County Oct 23rd 1919 M.V.Freeze, plaintiff. { Vs | Affidavit to obtain order of Publication Ruth Freeze, defendant. M.V.Freeze..being. duly. sworn, says. that, this action is. brought heresies all dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between himself and his wife Ruth Freeze; that it is a bona fide cause of action; that the defen- dant after dums diligence and search cannot be found in Iredell County and State of North Carolina; that she is a necessary party to said enause of action and he therefore prays the Court to issue and order of publicition for the defendant to be ahd appear and plead or demur to the Complaint, which Complaint is herewith filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Irdell County. M.V.Freeze Vs RNR ERE ET RE aC Ruth Freeze. Tu iatrronat 3 Sepa ween «5 hee Affidavit to obtain order of Publication Piled in this Office Oct 23rd 1919 i FE fr Freeze, M. V. vs, Freeze, Ruth 1919 qiny ‘ezse17 ‘SA ‘A ‘W ‘dz2017 6161 OL APR Ome oR IR ORRRRERENDRNG North Carolina Superior Court Irdell County . Octv, 23rd 1919 M.V.Preeze, plaintif? Vs ; Order of Publication, Ruth Freeze, defendant. This cause coming on be fore me upon the Affidavit of the Plaintiff and it appearing to the Court that the defendant, Ruth Freeze, is & necessary party to the cause of action, the same being to dissolve the bends of matrimony between plaintiff, that she cannot after due diligence and search be found in Ired@1l County and state of North Carolina, and the Sheriff of the County having made due return that defeniant " not to be founa in Iredell County and State,. It is therefore ordered that publication be made in the Sentinel, a newspaper published in Statesville, Iredell County North Carolina, for the Space of Four weeks, notifying the defendant of the cause of the action and return date, when appearance is required to be made, or the prayer contained in the Complaint, whic is this day filed in this office, will be granted, Clerk Superior Court, M.V.Preeze. Vs Ruth Preeze. Order of Publicstin, this day granted. Oct 23rd 1919 itl ai a oa Freeze, M. V. vs. Freeze, Ruth 1919 yiny “ezseLy ‘SA “A “W ‘8z001,3 6161 TR RES eT ee RII North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County . Oct ‘25rd 1919 M. V. Freeze, plaintiff. Vs | Service by Publication. Ruth Freeze, defendant. i AP EAN ANNI IF cE MES Ger IB NEY lt te ee Sh eg 4 emeinnananennenmencete me ; momma a se) MAE 3 Bisel NS The defendant in the above entitled action will take notice thet an action, entitled as above has been instituted in the Superior Court of Iredell County against her, to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between herself and the plaintiff, her husband; thatsaid action was begun on the 23rd day of Oct 1919, Summons returnable before the Clerk of the Court on the 8th day of November, at which time she is required to appear and answer or demur to the Complaint as she may be advised or the prayer will be granted, Publication of this notice for four weeks in some nwespaper in the County may suspend the time of granting the prayer until the expiration of said time. Done at my Office in the City of Statesville, County of Iredell] and State of North Carolina, this Oct 23rd 1919 Clerk of Superior Court Caldwell & Caldwell, Attys. M.V.Freeze Vs “Ruth Preeze Service by Publication Freeze, M. V. vs. Freeze, Ruth 1919 yiny ‘ezeer7 “SA ‘A W “OZ391q 6161 oe North Carolina Superior Court Irdell County Oct 23rd 1919 M.V.Freeze, plaintiff. | Vs | Tesves, _ j Ruth. Preeze, defendant. First. Did plaintiff and defendant married as aleged in the Complaint? Answer, Second, Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer. Third, Had the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceeding the filing of the Complaint? Answer. Fourth. Did the Plaintiff have knowledge of the act complained of for six months prior to the filing of the Complaint? Answer, M.V.Preeze, plaintiff Vs Ruth Freeze, defendant Freeze, M. V. vs. Freeze, Ruth 1919 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term 1903 Margaret A. freeze, plaintiff vs Complaint. F. A. Freeze, defendant. The plaintiff complains and says;- First.--~-- That she and thedefendant were married on the 16th day of October 1895 and lived together man and wife until the lat day of September 1897. That there was born to the plaintiff and her said husband, one child, now living and in the possession of the plaintiff Second.-~---That on the lst day of September 1897, the defendant, without any cause whatsoever abandoned and left he plaintiff and has not lived with her since said date’. That as plaintiff is in- formed and beleives the said defendant is now and has been since the @ate above named in the State of Texas, and has failed to provide for the plaintiff or the child by him begot en. Tat the plaintiff is now and has been all her life a resident of the State of North carolina and the causeses herein set forth have been known to her for more than two years next preceeding the commencement of “his action, That she has resided in the State for more than five years before commencing this cation, Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment: First.-- That the bonds of matrimony existing between herself and the defendant be dissolved because of the abandoment hereinbefore al} leged, For the cost of the action and for such other and further releif as my be just and right. 2 ae C CLeS9e..c¢ Atty for plaintiff Margaret A. Freeze being dily sworn says that the foregoing Complaint is true as of her own knowledge except as to matters and things there in ated upon information and boleif and as _todhose she belejves it to be true. / nr QA 4 WX Sworn to and subscribed before A MM J Dre “SA “3 : F % 4 Margaret A.Freeze, plaintiff vs Affidavit. F.A.Freeze, defendant. Margaret A.Freeze, plaintiff in the above entitled case being duly sworn says, that the facts set forth in the colplaint to the best of her beleif are true and that her said com lairt is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and her said usband, and not for he mere purpose of being freed and separated from her said hus band, but in sincerity and truth for the cause mentioned in her com- plaint; that the facts set forth in her said complaint have existed to her knowledge for more than two or five years prior to the filing of this complaint; that she has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for many years in fact all her life. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 18th day of May 1905. (Dpangaachs Q. Livegs — a Le oe vs. Freeze, F. A. a | ; - a Ze a = ¢ nowt. og He Pack aXyirr. G Aha. Dou pre- Lk, rrr tiw Oe Lion, Zev — ° X Yh es a | vI6l Bud] ‘eZ201,] ‘SA “TO ‘ozaa1y SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesviffe, N. C. 3-15- 13-1M. County--9n the Superior Court, SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. , - Dou are hereby Conimanded to summon jlo ae Ihe P a the err Gila: egret Atectenag the defendant _ above named, if th be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of uperior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of, 4.74 @ cee. at the Court House in o ee Mkse-tte on the... WS Monday Fo Da Monday of VALa< a the same being thie ZG day of .19\%., and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office“6f the Clerk days of said Term, and let said Defendant .take notice if Pha they fail to answer to the said complaint will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. the Superior Court for said County, within the first three within that time, the plaintiff ali not, and of this summons make due return. er my hand and seal of said Court, this <0 oss. SQLS Given u A A x7 7 Clerk of Supérior Court See cheee County. Fae. Qee se aad Jet pe Ao-thhr ti» Whi 11 tt a—f- a Ch sahuig —_— ) ae , Ger 24 waar) Omed Zo / ‘ — Utherte GK Al, BUT “OZ201,] ‘SA "TO ‘ozao1y vI6l We acknowledge ourselves bound unto the Defendant in this action, in the sum of Dollars, to_be void, | however, if the Plaintiff : shall pay the Defendant all such cost as the Defendant in this action. .... being sworn says he is worth the st of two hundred dollars over and above his debts, liabilities and property exempt from executions. Sworn to and subscribed before me this __ pase y 4 ¢ Plaintiff’s Attorney. AGAINST A of the Superior Court ot Me Ake County. A, tA Ay wtf oi € Received \JXOA » Nit SOS = ~*~ Returnable to. | . ’ bus] ‘3z0015 ‘SA "J 'O ‘ozaa1y vi6l ert Aeeeeesecinneees a =. ee [200 FE Forlenan Pel, . Rm Llu of Morih barbie, a Affe Sauk ’ felec raciuk, fund beer ince Rese teal Deen. Aes, Ioncrboawt, wild ofa heme 4 tei donk of the a ee i Coenee, Arr Gang, He Afar hk Crranitae arieh om tat. rb Mont auf Hpi Atbrnz in no at a Se Pree, & Andinnen be Rh flacuh | ee ea fs ces “ He plait ha me Oh tctte with h tfundrut ee Snes Net. For he Enidloeu) Coe BUdT ‘eZ201,] ‘SA “TO ‘ozoany vi6l p Rage agen bned coker tome bn ee X fre ace catia G2 went for Kv) Me ESS ee ——— fe boek fo arcaied rctin Be fodniy of bn rag ** Ju the, Ax. JPL tor, TLL poehaecty ClLt4 Oey “WIN 4. iY. 1 (eee Mp POIVIR YW WE G7i/ AG -ypr"~ey7 WA 2 ways Rey? we Freeze, Q. L. VS. Freeze, Lena 1914 BUdT “3Z901] ‘SA “TO ‘oza014 vié6l } No. 102. Subpoena—State.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C, 6-12-’06-1M. She Aske. COUNT Y-In the Superior Court. The State of Worth Carolina, To the Sheriff of _.7 Wou are hereby Commanded to summon AA bhafalelas..jjuD- PRE... Been ed a (if to be found in your county), personally to be and appear before His Honor, Judge of our Superior Court for the County of County—-Greeting : on the part of the..........Y.ABROe.. Herein fail not at your peril. Given under my band tbis......... a > Clerk Superior Court, IPs: 9 (SPY. eile 5 C. ‘STATE SUBPOENA eel c¥ a UOWUNS Of PajIastp Agasag 240 NOX ahd ubtiedng 0 y491D 243 OL £ Freeze, Q. L. vs. Freeze,Lena 1914 BUST ‘az901,7 ‘SA “T ‘© ‘oz0015 vi6l Freeze, Q. L. vs. Freeze, Lena Bua ‘oz201,J ‘SA “TO ‘ozao14 vI6l BUST ‘ezao17 SA “TO ‘ozoa1q vi6l sear torr soit: Sieniienseesiieansnaaae ee BUST “oZ201,7 ‘SA “TO ‘ozoony vI6l Bond, including Justification IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. area nen pen, tm . |] Appeal from Clerk to Judge County. | Order for gnlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders | Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . ] Order of Arrest ; FGubpcena, each name | Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. ......, |] Continuance | Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing. ....., °. i : Issuing Commission Judgment Against ‘ Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment final in term time | Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . ..°. . . EN ss 6 wipes bcs a 6 ae ye ex parte Proceedings Judgment Transcript of Judgment Extcution dgd Sheriff's Return Appeal to Supreme Court, inclu | Transcript to Supreme Court. . } County Tax, when Jury impareled nuit AA CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL, (As Fixed by the Code.) Term, 191. al \ \ ed | he Freeze, Q. L. vs, Freeze, Lena 1914 i ke a a Sa OTs nrtrcour2r athe our sods ie os ae Ae Ae ple te. on wm dipdlbewnd Mri rar oa ar Mew prrrinrredg, a chine | chen eetaris “ari Res fod "oe hina | ie ae 9 G ‘2052121 ‘M4ATD “TTIH °H ‘f GSTIAGIAIZ Ooty Nernst } dtd 2 VRegiinn Ae oe Meo. Phi ba Ptr 7 Peon AX Sf: > —e- ay ea Se