Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDivorce Records 1855-1913 Clark-Dry 5 Seno | CeCe (Ace Aearcau. A CTR Byen..c, | Sf tn hece Mice Ag 0- Jtoar | Oe — as fae ce is Gaal ( than. Cra. Nau. $GMCA KAMNNEG. OK | f eV Oe K eeee A CAR PCA Cee CX eA Pt heperA ECR ap Gy Ao fis Meher Ca Pe ee t= Sha. Cite la pete OC ee Oe il Je, a ClOCe Cay. LOCC | } I~ kx nego. lai tig. Recccane 3 | PR ccs ce Sale. a Acltheee | A. tury denahefiiuiA a. Cc Bon Le SA LR A ia. Seat Mn Gx bye fan Os fae . 2 Lyd eM LARK A Of aK MO CK CP pe aihkowr ANtucrS Av jax PHO lO ae Dace PHO peag: [Pr es CB 6 2 Or CAauBiakd ee l= Lac), fue iil tev a i 1 Sie Lo oc ta) ag Mt 20 le A. acY hat Sh Ga. oe Cx bee. bh Cun slo Ae ¢ Ze. Chad | Of CA HBG in eh | Rd Ue Preull apd. Jhorng fo fees CLA pr CawZFask | lh=Lac/} CA oe aC thd achat Za C Abe aig ae 3 a Inter. (haw Lt (lect | ee CAR Oe A Cha fa etre 2 0 Cenck aa es ges Se Toe Cl ok B oa oo ae CR vee ails KW blake, ahkee Oki xo tne Thea Oe SEES~ : EH Yiu tle; lx Ly QO hit = wk hhc Seca Moh Corec._. Nh rigor Res Onan Ky Bm Cree ne | CC a2 Kas acMteBeegy Slat elt, eee ( FE Z cof elenen ee tinny lax ta. O(a be fla ren Breer tryhice ; eect FAK EA et Ka a SZace Peel C exw if ee Leeac. > ie ae Hugeet ON 8 0 ee tec T= GL ye thm 1 | NORM canouana: Ti Superior Court, Rebecca R. Clark not F. QO, Clark, ' ' i: “) pearing to the Sing dba? A Gs i az ” a - Ute eis heres , foe } € defendant, F. O. Clark, "| dent of the State of North Carolina, h | by notified to appear at the next term of Ire- | dell Superior Court, to be held at the court } house in Statesville, on the 4th Monday before the Ist Monday in September, 1885, and an- | Swer to the complaint of the plaintiff which ] will be filed within the first three days of said term, or judgment will be entered for plaintifr us asked for in the complaint. J. B. CONNELLY, 0.8.9. || D. M. Furches, attorney. 4) | Tune 26, 1885—6t. : / {MA COMME, Me Cinsoped adel lay been frbi & Weeber un Par ie Lh calcio F Nee CAnoonra, Tn Superior Court, j Rebecca R. Olark against F. QO, Clark, Action for divorce. ‘|, Itappearing to the satisfactio of oa : | that the defendant, F. oO. Clark, if’a ” | dent of the State of North Carolina, he is heie- J & tA“ ai 18S € % 8 Ye CE Nalesurlle, Gb ‘ ¥ | dell Superior Court, to be held at the conrt|| house in Statesville, on the 4th Monday before | the Ist Monday in September, 1885, and an- ; , | Swer to the complaint of the plaintiff? which f C f y || Will be filed within the first three days of said |} é term, or judgment will be entered for plaintiff }} as asked for in the complaint. J.B. CONNELLY, 0.8. 9. Boh Tastee sora. Do CLE Ba 7 al mle : GZ, beudspafiel tan fel Ctinting Eile He Lupe : oo Sh. i by notified to appear at the next term of Ire- Madd it ho Uarh £2 Cert éf- | ffico| | Me assed ade hay baow forbi Ay eect ote Vege, Poin 2 a pty EEE ig tie 2 FN ome cancun seperor oon | ~ Rebecca R, Clark agtinst F. QO. Clark. Action for divorce. as lee It appearing to the satisfactiohof | that the defendant, F. oO. Clark, is‘a “TOS be | y 4 | dent of the Siate of North Carolina, he is hete- % Ww | by notified to appear at the next term of Ire- | Me CC. CWialosares LZ ; — | dell Superior Court, to be held at the conrt|| + | | house in Statesville, on the 4th Monday before YY fs 4p Ce , . the Ist Monday in September, 1885, and an- ‘| swer to the complaint of the plaintiff which f Os will be filed within the first three days of said |? é term, or jndgment will be entered for plaintiff |} as asked for in the complaint. J. B. CONNELLY, 0.8. 9, we i 27 (4 D. M. Furches, attorney, tC bedi ufiel nw fol Chnting Citatr CAhement rac fare penemenl Dads te ark U2 Crk 64 ~ | xv" 20 qj oes ae Me Uagapeds ul iy bene fbi © Wola | a out e = yuttee | 1D fb t Cretutty CLS 4 | ’ ' won SEE ' IN ten GARONA, fin Superior Court, |, ‘ : di Rebecca R. Clark against F. O, Olark. ‘ i ‘ 4a es fp oy iv ¢ \ . - F oe Action for divorce, an Mab ol Tt appearing to the satisfactiohof the.on £ J tnat'the defendant, F. O. Clark, isa Hbeorck dent of the Siate of North Carolina, he is heie- by notified to appear at the next term of Ire- } dell Superior Court, to be held at the court + |} house in Statesville, on the 4th Monday before 4] #3 || the Ist Monday .in September, 1885, und an-|/ A fo Swer to the complaint of the plaintiff which V4 ce £ '] Will be filed within the first three days of said é term, or judgment will be entered for plaintiff as asked for in the complaint. J. B. CONNELLY, 0.8. 6 ches, "y, NL yeuon, ee attorney t Va t =P Ge GPUC LUA MOM. CG bespofiel and fol F tunting Ciballishiment ee r See a eee 10 wo yo acer CRN UE cr adnan ES Oe REE eee eg nn al KPGIeR: | a qeepeess ~~ TUAd AN Hark UPACert b4- | S| 00 i / a, aed 4 Ne tnyoped, aut hts be frrnsbed 6 WKihe in he, ate 4 |v Valder Ruts Cute. oar, l22t Gert oe | we : oT Dutluats IG.) Cossvuvig Ate > , ul oo RE NT CAROUING, fin Superior Court, |, Rebecca R, Clark agtinst F. O, Clark, Action for divorce. ‘ | . i 4 ) f oy 4 ‘e ff / aa tae “teil A zo It appearing fo the satisfactiohof the.couct ' ‘ CH los LAL é, . C, smerny capone were 48S that the defendant, F. O. Clark, is a Ron-red mca dent of the Siate of North Carolina, he is heve- || F by notified to appear at the next term of Ire- | dell Superior Court, to be held at the court]) a house in Statesville, on the 4th Monday before || AL the Ist Monday in September, 1885, and an- |} A EP ce Swer to the complaint of the plaintiff which Lf, cé r f will be filed within the first three days of said |! term, or judgment will be entered for plaintiff |} ts asked for in the complaint. J.B. CONNELLY, 0.8. 9, D. M. Furches, attorney. : IY oe Ya HX Git. Aamdmeath June 26, 1885—6t, y ements D7 ips 7 Shes “apiel and fol ef tenting, Citallishiment 0) n ae ad AN Uprh LAC bt- | foo Me Onpeperd otf hay bon fermbot 6 Weekes | > 4? Vakdaueee | how VE FF O~ | fa AN act” te tk. Aileen | | Cee apg han Ag ee LP | , J ne ey eee a a ; A | Sagi vge: ., evute Preletl : S dferar. SOC SOPO : oS aS eT LOC Y tx cx latter tick . with Ki Aflin kant nro Lav~eeh treG ee a x ~ Z a Irom ape Ket De flrr- Lik Ariz hifler Da Vs frlbrriget an tei Flow +» KR R forts et fro lena y tm Exar tn Cesstinehe FD | ak DOCS p~ PE srt g ns Abe we bss 7 Pht low LR Wun g blr bom Jee Ba Afflinr Maet W14 Catne-L, fame Fa flow bff met g Pe | i tuba Ud aa Y . cae wd, 3 eo | | > Arnet hilhin be A124 f> bh | ee Ont a whey A. Dm melhy fry jwr1.2 —s fp La Af fiero) th flor. Ud mfr ith. tee tmnnwwk 111 vo > a, Wr~> prpes J a lif cheese <— 1 {~ (* Sie 15 2 te ove a sla —~ o Br | COrrmfrtet + Kaceetr | Atle Mae Jo ftom 7 J [en ngs A BR femng es ge | 4 nw. tre CA ery a ee. Vive, | Kise ot tu fone tL me Le CZ tg oh, tee he HA hades itn Ox. i e.. O~ Pine ste Privfhas Catt. ot jhe A Mpa f Cer flr 47 nwt run i~a-e7 iF Cree, Cran. 4 CS ei bc tt ~t14. pr Ale . ie (4 se ~ fn cav-Ce rls ot Coed Kee pi la power (- F Ab<s _ The Cort ALE ino satamdn EEN aD PNP cL Se = | ' , ; 1 eis hoc Bax : - / sgh i toe nab th Pres Tt che | f “4 Mild tr Ogle fe ag bet kB Tse trans, Whene ake won’ per ely <> Rach bs Cerny ark ot. | Pe Le IO, Fee Zo. | a _huce tr ALS, bit. the,th.4 5 ae allepaton a qoaep *zeqeIQg “SA 7 6y qooep ‘zeqe19 “SA qooep ‘seqez9 | “7. nt yoo Cae otc ow #F Pood & pe ie : lake! tale hak ot A oy | Mak oh cored frvv I a ore BI 2008 7 Ke YW Ktow a fl Foo oe Gakar — — pees Or » ples a en P<_tliui, /2 cea BBE Re es ls Cite pat * ee | btw Comm FES ; Po ene liye | ow qooep ‘10qez) Y it D te ; 4 : . qooep fa03e1) “SA Wc & &E « - De blk ogg GY Aa at a. > * | hack Moc — race SiS nae. CP ved os ASe a Poe n ely At. Agel frre Fos fe pica eS Be elegy a oe — avr & Dioga Jho VE. a “2 an. se ghee Spe ay4- tea Cie Luk D>: CAS ASE oye ~? coach Gan eee BM OLO Or IV Ge sod BF a, yas f2« Aa “2 Ki Oe as ee ee a CS Lex eS Late TO Be. © C Ax 5%. Ven. Crates SRA Om oe ec T — - ‘ zr Pitas ZA ae r Pat 24 off fe gs con 7 ee. Sa ar | he Bede rg Bee | Ws SE. Bae a: . | rh ek A pee Sz ga. gor ete, A lel ee vn a cw AA. ao eu i coer. Gh CMe Aang ad | Se fe Bg CR ee C&Or Sk Sree. | Lew 0 ee Ql, cols. Lec C few, . 1g flex fle oe - Bans ae Uy AG Jee x a Pa e.< ae FEAT oe eo «+ Oe fad oe erin. oe a 2a & a8 eH nek. +.» ae LHe. c a PEF Whe y Cis PEL Bare Se Sr C cote —— Vea one: Saft a Cee lle fe. ZFtat € las, BG SE ee ua at Aaeltarn~, Reo he ATE OMY wit Men Be Tar aie le oi cece blow fen KS we Mc con's (PRG le hi: eo Si COCA BK | Fee oS <. te po peer Fel. Lae Cr Cae. ho. Pe a ae fr J 2D mage Lao 9 o- 5 Yr © Lite ee Dy Liated (Pilkey, Mek s free CH Mire. ore S Ca 6s oc. | tee hl = e079 bo oA Cee é he A rats a. : Hh AX COMME A aw Ba | > «a oe Bei nba ~ Bue, i IC, fla CAa 4 7 a. a 4 ) Ae : far wee’ fag 2 eapeaggoes Sr gos ‘ 4 wae ae Crgelorn oe as Shia - a4 be peor f cLElLSl i Se . Ura >, May : vs. _ Crater, Jacob A. a bien (Qh face Aree /PEL Mesry. & nde. Ve — a es So Naent. Grater Yor vie, Pafte Patzae , tak at /6%, Que Afftieahrn Rts Athicte LLE : A ccc Saas SOFLR. Mary E. Grote iia ae Jaect Bratt Baw tt Ce fred by fave OL Bs Boast Pla 2h Qreehlurie ered Bouse (t Mat cs Hough he ait oa ee a pou Atfr-. GflecFanwake cele GC Ler wrk ficrhout Jeert Braker yet Hak for x Boy | exe flrecw one & Gh Ea, JOSP Her Oxee fecbawat Kove cefhoe Prrceery PE Rcewe<<~ Ahccace cl cecev €; WF Cre olet Boe <ft Goc << oe y ern e | hak aeherccX zh as bbc Sor Ss ei cL My Sle Mae act & ene Qed Zeige, Grace 20 Geox Gr Aout lech techie Qpaiik ZB ave of BH Hn atl he Gace Zire retin 2S iy 4 2 Lewecoced Wherech CLL" 20 Amin AOL Nihal) A ab dbniad Mince ote en gece rz. e Ke ALE. Sa see. Chins at ee Z, } remre Sneneneantaenenaetranetaraaerneenen te een ere PN mem ore Tee sagt NIN Dicin Che tn prone Meo Ae ge ec em ee Loeune 2 swe gp bey, Die Eee Le: Gb eo ae ee cites a Oey cry Kak fe Corrvreutt never Ce Cotes : huth uiflacrak ans Ler chLiCorre. 42K . the frevecsts Weed cefeon Au. te Pa ee hearneg hie ferceth fe chive Qi Alain ak @ “irhkh thw wk Le fi kKous art fer wih 2 AGL dhih Met a4 Lh Fett. PK Soe funk Beal fr« wr of ane Ceneae flow een a Aan. Pe Ce. cn Kathy Of Met: iD | eer ions, cana Ane tana pore AM aoieaiohe:, eng Argh: Que Oe fle.hawk weed beep r Qos oe ee coe, aie Cae nag Oh Gud ating @ Bs che of Ke- Cheb int Capper. Banal Cae heat Heat ena, din odbenmd Cis ees, Oe CAPE eed ke OLeeree ey hi Cionns Cetin we KH Ae or olga ‘ hae ce. “w14 Og tin tie asin Cle Keane et, fiercest he fcc ace L a at he . f 444 SOc ih, ia ole me & Cove ce hore, 7 | ae of has A pigs A Bh on a pace en of fiat haye fonnt turk a beneG comaphen, -4 hin hen Lhlne a wrk t~obuwe £4 Eating: tans i MS Alle @bcuntk The Be 2eZ a Afb Ga AE ZZ fun la Zoseper ZT Cem ga neal Ghnaie pecMewcrema Atatrelecek Of the CMa sme i Re ssi ia Ge os ee ae fen eat As aves | Meads Aa co- cl mae | prnae Cocte: Ge, HE | a on v1 irez ae 2b | OP Reset Goats j tect hoon AB sa | Osvowcitt, sbiliiin.s Bile tity tic, Lses Cremtech oath BAA Ae fudts ant fovch, csr le Geek GF her frown lage aut FeAl 2.1 HL Be Glee) Ore6Leccuk cD Rok Prema Cnk of Gorge | he rete fem forms ff Carry forces ov Ofc Pies cies eek feck cin Berns QO Lan, | Cf encarta a Ake ype. Po fem LA Aorvmng Fa. ZR 2aff- Je ee DirPDr le foe ric Prana QA. Claw ee tee Pena fe a apn hoe Al~ SOS aa Ze. etme ee Af a pif tn 7 SG; Ahins FE Ci tneae . e Pr rae Liza Bie. clade a ( Ce. TS a ae i ae i i oe aaa oe Orne AYE Cf LA Bictecgyereet ge fA lt Gee lac” we, nt (P2102zt YeaHy 2 iy PD Aé ip Cae lel te. is nile Ae2 eins ae —_ eile ibe tLe ie Bd ake oo Priv 0 ne Ot ee a. a LY¥82tCEL VEC7371172144. -t_— B2o1e0. Dr 21.0 at fe anil Aaven fee = LG (Anaad aa il Ltn. (22 An LA4 ee ee er ‘ ( Lig vod | by mn ae North arolina — In the Superior Court [Iredell County Febry Term 1898 R. P. Crater, plaintiff. Vs \Isadore Crater, aefendant. ” The plaintiff complains and says, First-- That he and the defendant intermarrieda in the year 1894 Seeond-- That they livea together @s man ant. wife until the 4th day of November following, when the defendant, without any fault or blame upon the part of this plaintiff, abandoned him and sinee said time has lived separate ana apart from this plaintiff anda still lives woparate and apart from him Third-- That the plaintiff is a resiaent of the State of North Carolina and has been for more than two years next presecding the abanaonment ana separation alleged above ami more than two years next preceeding the commeneenent of this action. Wherefore plaintiff prays; Firte-- That the bonds of matrimony heretofore and now exist ing between himself ana the defendant be dissolved. Seeond--That plaintiff be freed ana disehargeca of any and all liability beeause of the relations heretofore existing between them, and for such other ana further releif as may be right L.C.Caldwell Atty R.P.Crater makes oath that the facts set forth in the forego- ing somplaint are true except those matters statea on informa en pce ea oD be Die ti, " Isadore Crater, defendant R.?.crater etre auly sworn says that to the best of his knowl- edge and beleif the facts set forth in his said somplaint are true; that said complaint is not made out of levity or by col- lusion between himself and his este wife ami not for the oe pose of being freed and soparated from each other, but in sin- eerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the eamplaint am that the faete set forth in his said canplaint have existed to his knowledge more than 81x months prior to the filing of the complaint; that plaintiff has been & resident of the state for more than two years next preceeding the filing of this compia int | Issues. First t- Did plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged? | ANS. oe ’ Ye Second:- Did defendant separate herself from and abandon the plaintiff as alleged in the complaint? Ans. met Third:- Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and live separate and apart from him for two years before the coillicnoe- ment of this action? Ans: Fourth t< Was the plaintiff a resident of the State for two years next preceding the conmencenent of this action? Ans. - ro d *Y *2r98qeIp -aoseelt fhopelis 2s ywetatrrotal gashireteb ‘ute Tehealtale Sia ‘ou & 4 A \ . 0 ( ovatsgoa Jnebieted Br -thiiooe8 mob -sada Sasa mort tloavcocd sicieo off ak Soyetia ws Bt hiautsic on? > iw biog be 8d De bs —y EictaLlq od? rrobusdg diuabmetoh off Bid WA wale soted erasev cw? soT : a ww @ rf Ser eer we Law rot 3s : (fhooon, txenr ersey «3! tA we North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County May Term 1898 J I I I () R. P. Crater, plaintiff J Jedgmeant. Vs Isadore Crater, defendant This cause caning on to be heard at this term of the Court before McIver, Judge and a Jury and.being heard upon the whole record and the Jury having found the following ismes in favor of the plaintiff, vis; lst-- Didd plaintiff and dat dchent intermarry as alleged? Answer--Yes. 2nd-- Did defendant separate herself from and abandon plaintiff as alleged in the canplai nt? Answer-- Yes. Srd-- Dia defendant abandon plaintiff and live separate and apart from him for two years before the tommencement of this action? Answer-- Yes. 4th-- was plaintiff a resident of the State for two years next preceeding the cammencement of this action? Answer-- Yes/ It is therefore sonasderes ang adjudged by the Court, that upon the foregoing verdict the plaintiff is entitled to a de- cree of divorce, ana he is hereby discharged from ang and all liability by reason of the marriage aforesaid and the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defen- dant be and the,same are hereby dissolved. DL Vea . Ga Judge Presiding Crater. R. Pp. Ke tf i ee ec: oni ect hak fn Bo oT, o quan’ Oecercx, Feeney fu mors > : of. =e Se a eS trl ron fees (02 frertt forrers fac 4, Geeta weeny ><t-we Lan, cms ede. fe uleweinl PCAmnae~. ZG Gun ee cet titel So Ka Joon aid ae» Asc Jone eoyung ‘1eyo>zTI9 oO "7 - cr ° > @ “ » oO . > ° QoQ 4 = co Q sx <0 or" ae ° @ *y °D ‘aeyozTIO *SA eoyung ‘1eYyo3zT419 eit pat EE Katusd fe a2 eet eee ORS pote Lr? pea Y Sloot aienested ea! GORE 5 hof her eae. WA che mh g Gfnt , ERS Ciel fl Sa ee ches feta Ge 2° Oh Le Fb On Oe Ope — Mt each - hat er : Lofsrct Vas he frost 10 L. aha PP ie ner sy 7 | L. ir $5 ee Sf - TX neogpe oa Mr lees ve Mae Por. Rrablh\ ,R ALR i ence J fan Srerve Q abu. Mok ha A mL Oe an wee. JZ e 43 A z 44 PRM, MAS wees * Be ee Pronk GOL Gol sehen t cng Omen een ha~e < a o & % 4 he 6 & yo ®< ® tah a . E 5 > ° ° ® Critcher, Bunice vs. Critcher, G. A. < o : Z 3 f oO 4 os cr ° s @ “ J Q . > . be bufon—~ Aa. >. id. ee CDnek flees orche., Lenat aus Ce mice < ao o ¢ + © - od@ yo” ese « "§ _ ; = @® Critcher, Bunice vs. Critcher, G. A. BILL OF COSTS.—CIVIL.—Printed and for sale at The Landmark Job Office, Statesville, N. C. 2-1-’96-1m. Originat Summons, or names therein Docket BVORY CODY OF MOIR. oiicccenccsissca sactah crc eas oc IN THE SUPERIOR GOURT, _ || Bona. inctuding Justinention Pigeon sussien Appeal from (Clerk Order for enlarging time of pleading . Interlocutory Orders [ Sofreys ‘IBPMOID "SA ZOU] SITIAY “‘IOPMOID Me MOMOR AGO: POND ii.) ciscsss eddnsuarkovedeoreaneadakaltaiabsntonuie ck ooline Injunction Order, including Bond and Justification £061 Order of Arrest Subpena, each name. Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian.............. kena sink WORM WON g skis sr cussbisics sebsisisbine essustsdossdcadoes Sosssncrensteue olacae ad Against Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing ee ARNO MNMNENED 05.6: <0 Lacapccdesbakeah aante. deoubes asane chenatesaao icia fiidavit, including Jurat and Certificate .. 0... . ...ccesc000 | Motion, Entry and Record ot...b>lK. | Notice | Notice, for each name over one in same paper | Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment Against Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support......0.. 1. co. ceceeee Docketing same. Docketing ex parte Proceedings “ Judgment Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Lae actual Sheriff's Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal..... .... Ty ript to Supreme Court, ..... ...copy sheets, each ounty Tax, w Jury impaneled Referee’s Allowance || Constablé Magistrate } || Plaintiff's Witnesses i i | 1] } | | } 1] 1} | poe WG, (“apo aq} 44 paxy sy ) [1at-S480D fo 1107 “LIAIQIOd TAII Crowder, Willie Inez vs. Crowder, Charles I. 1903 3-29-’011M SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Fhepis ge the Superior Court. | So]JeYD “IspMmoiy “SA ZOU] SILA, “Iapmoig SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. £061 the Defendant above a ae nd within your County, to be and appear before thy Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County ww At the fourt Hou. on the. ewan after the ZO 4 >... Monda f...... the same being the Saat and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if . fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this on Ss day p peg Clerk of Superior aoe SEE County. | So]eY_D “IspMoiy “SA ZOU] SILA, “ISpMmoIig £061 Hermetic entree tet Cette etter eset sniitne 0} I[qQeUINjay ynoD soradng a3 jo JHT9Y BOs SNOWWNS ZAMIONY SyQUreyg ‘Ayunosd eS o61 ‘ula, Fy fo fivp S14) au aLofag pegrs9asqns pun 0} ULOMS ‘suoynoaxa wods yduaxa Ajpsadoad pun sarjyiqny ‘s}qap sty anogn pun 4300 84D]]0p paspuny om) Jo uns ay) Yyj,4om $1 ay shins usoms Guraq (*jpag¢) (*ypag) ("78g ) 061 a ‘¥ fo fivp S14] ‘8]Das puv spuDY Ano ssaupi4y "UOljaD Sy) Ut Hiyumjg ay} fo 4900904 fivwu quD “puafag ay} sp 7809 Yyans 7)D juppuafaq ay) Rod yoys Sywog ay) fi ‘4anamoy ‘pron aq 0} ‘sanpjog JO wins 44} ul Monon siyj ut yuppuaseg ay} Of saajapino abpaymouyon any \ pi ‘os ov / “ALN|OD A / pinoy) sorsadng ay} uy : “YNITIONVD HLNON SAO JALYLS . ‘[ SojreyD “Iapmoig “SA ZOU] STEM ‘IOPMOID £061 tatesvill, J, O2 | olintee LY C HE LANDMAR One Year, $2.00 CALDWELL & CLARK, PROPRIETORS. Six [Months, 1.00 Three Mon A PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIB see } yee ‘[ SapqeyD “Iapmoiy "SA ZOU] SNIEA\ “IOpMosd £061 4 Nalesrtlle, (4, GC “<THE LANDMAR One Year, $2.00 CALDWELL & CLARK, PROPRIETORS. Six Months, 1.00) ________ : PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRID lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally "| Sa]tBYD “Jopmoip "SA ZOU] SN IIA\ “I9PMOID £061 Salesrle, < C@ 4 CALDWELL a CLARK, PROPRIETORS. ~ PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK : TUESDAY AND FRID lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ‘[ sqjzeyp ‘Iopmoiy ‘SA ZOU] STEM “IOPMOID £061 Nataulle, (4, Cr _ oknrce, 00/ C ee = THE LANDMARK naman One Year, $2.00 ~ GALDWELL & VELL & CLARK, PROPRIETORS. Six Months, g.00 | PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRI D Tae « ont fe Kevbert, Ors tor. Cou ty lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally ‘[ SajqeyD “Iapmoig “SA ZOU] STII ‘IOPMOID £061 = ianena eee Gefendant above named wilt “f/f viruipantiarsipete sag i MNatesrlle, 4, 4 one aon that he 1s ot os be Snes aie — “THE E LAN A ND - MA m K One Year, Six Months, : eae Se “PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK : “TUESDAY AND FRID Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally | S3JJeY_D “IapMmoiy "SA ZOU] SII “Iapmois £061 Advertising Rates Furnished CALDWELL & CLARK, PROPRIETORS. PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK : TURSDAY. AND FRIDAY. on Application. | SopJeYD “IapMolD "SA ZOU] STII “IspMmoiy £061 Aalesvill, 1p, O2 ALK Z G02 Furnished HE LANDMARK, & |-== CALDWELL & CLARK, PROPRIETORS. on Application. PUBLISHED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. | SajseyD “Iapmoiy ‘SA ZOU] SIIIA\ “IOpMmosy a ‘Oo So Ww ‘| SopBYD “IapMmoig “SA ZOU] STII “IOpMOID £061 North Carolina, | In the Superior Court, Iredell county, November Term, 1903. Willie Inez Crowder, vs Complaint. Charles I. Crowder. The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges: de That on or about the 29th day of July, 1895, the plaintiff and the defendant intermarried, and ever since said time have been, and now are, husband and wife. 2. That soon after th: said marrtage the defendant became, and has been since, and is now, a habitual drunkard; that the occu- pation of the defendant at the marriage and until he left the plain- tiff, as hereinafter: alleged, was that of an itinerant patent med- icine vendex; that the plaintiff, at the request and solicitation of the defendant, accompanied him while on.the road selling medicine; that the defendant constantly engaged in the practice of getting drunk and leaving the plaintiff alone and unprotected at the hotels and boarding houses where they would be stopping, away from her home among strangers without food and without money, he often being taken by officers of the law and imprisoned for his disorderly con- duct and public drunkenness; that during these drunken debaucheries the defendant was very cruel to the plaintiff often cursing and abus- ing her and without any cause or provocation on her part; and on one Occasion, without provocation on the part of the plaintiff, the de- fendant threatened to shoot the plaintif*; that on another occasion while drunk the defendant violently assaulted the plaintiff and tore her clothes off of her; that these acts were without cause or provo- cation on the part of the plaintiff, and put the plaintiff in fear arm thet her life would be taken or that great bodily tem might be in- fiicted upon her; that the defendant has been frequently confined by judgements of the Courts upon the convict chain gang both in Iredell and ,ecklenburg Counties for his disorderly conduct; that plaintiff has borrowed money to pay fines and costs to keep defend- ant off the chain gang, afterwards repaying it by hen own labor. 3. That during the Summer or Fall of 1900 the plaintiff, on -l- I : | SapIVYD “IopMoIn "SA ZOU] SII “ISpMosia £061 account of the defendant's drunkenness and abuse as alleged in para- graph 2 hereof, and she having been left alone and unprotected without means of support’,, was living with her sister and her husband, Mr. & Mra. W. F. Madison, in the town of Mooresville, North carolina, where she has since lived and is now living; that during the Fall of 1900 the defendant came to the home of Mr. & Mrs. W. F. Madison aforesaid, where the plaintiff, his wife, had resorted for shelter. and support; that when the defendant came he was beastly drunk, so drunk that he was carried from the train to the hotel in Moores- ville; that soon afterrhis arrival, and while he was still dangerous- ly drunk, the defendant went to the home of said madison and wife, and while there cursed and abused the plaintiff, and threatened to kill her if she did not go to the hotel and sleep with him that night; that the plaintiff did not go to the hotel for the reason thet she was afraid the defendant would kill her. That the plein tiff begged the defendant to abandon his drunkenness and cease his abuse of her and live with her as her husband which he refused to ao; during his abuse of her the plaintiff did not quarrel with him and never’did anything to provoke the said conduct on the part of the defendant; that the defendant thereupon left the plaintiff in the home of yadison and wife and went away leaving the plaintiff without means of suppott, and has lived separate and apart from her ever since said time; that the defendant has not furnished anything for the support of the plaintiff since he abandoned her in the Fall of 1900 as aforesaid; that the plaintiff has had no account of him in over two yeare; that the last account she had of him he was said to be in the state of south Carolina; that this conduet on the part of the defendant in separating himself from the pleintirf end livifig separate and apart from her was wilfull on his part and without cause and that she did nothing at that time or any time to cause or pro- voke him to leave her; on the other hand the plaintiff has always been, and was at the time of said separation, a tyue and faithful wife to the defendant; that the defendant has thus wilfully and with out cause abandoned the plaintiff and lived separate and apart from her for more than two years next preceding the bringing of this ac- - Be “ | SojIeYyD “Ispmoiy "SA ZOU] STII “I9pMoip £061 tion and before the lst day of January, 1903. 4. ‘That the plaintiff has been’a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for five years next preceding the commencement of this action. Wherefore the plaintiff demands Judgement - Ais That the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintirr and the defendant beHissolveda and that the relation of husband and wife be determined. 2. For the costs of this action to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court. Bet GAs Attorneys for plaihtiff, Willie Inez Crowder being sworn says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of her knowledge and belief, and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between husband and wife and not for the mere purpose of being freedand separated from each other, but in sincereity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint as grounds for diworce have existed to her knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint; that the plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of North Carolina for five years next preceding the commencement of this action.. Mes. lmao Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 13th day of ge 1903. ] So]JeYD “Iopmoiy “SA ZOU] STII “IOpMOID £061 North parolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell county, November Term, 1903. Willie ynez Crowder, vs Charles I. Crowder, It appearing from the affidavit of Willie Inez Crowder in this action that Charles I. Crowder, the defendant therein, is not to be found in Iredell County, and cannot after due diligence be found within the State, and it further appearing that said action is for divorce and that the said charles I. Crowder is a proper party to said action: It is therefore ordered that n eof this action be publish ed once a week for six weeks i published in Iredell County, setting forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same and requiring the defendant to appear at the November Term of the Superior Court of Iredell Comnty, to be held on the ninth Monday after the first Monday in September, 1905, at the court house in said County and answer or demur to the complaint of 4 the plaintiff or the relief therein demanded will be granted. This the 13th day of July, 1903. Crowder, Willie Inez vs. Crowder, Charles I. 1903 Nerth Carolina, r™ the Superior Court, Iredell County, : November Term, 1903. Willie Inez crowder, | SopIeyD “Iapmoiy “SA ZOU] SII “IOPMOID vs £061 Charles I. Crowder. Willie Inez Crowder being duly sworn deposes and says: That in the above entitled action now pending in the superior Court. of Iredell County, the Sheriff of said County has returned the summons issved to him in said action enodrsed "Charles I. Crowder is not to be found in Iredell County"; that* the defendant therein cannot after due diligence be found within the State; that said action is for divorce and the defendant is a proper party to said action: Wherefore the said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina. This the 13th day of July, 1903. Z, Ge p_durhserchork aa 6 (OAKS 7 BZ CL CL 2D Crowder, Willie Inez vs. Crowder, Charles I. 1903 "[ SopzeyD “Iapmoiy “SA ZOU] STII “ISpMoiy £061 North Carolina # In the Superior Court, Iredell County # November Torm 1903, Willie Inez Crowder # vs, tr Issues, Charles I, Crowdor # (1) Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer:=~ U1, (2) Did‘the defendant wilfully without cause abandon the plaintiff and live separate and apart from g her as alleged in the complaint? Answer:— fo, swer Map (5) Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for five years next preceding the commencment of this , action? / CTE Answer:= WA) Crowder, Willie Inez vs. Crowder, Charles I. 1903 Crowder vs, Crowder * Issues, * ‘ : ~ M ‘[ SojzeyD “Iapmoia "SA ZOU] STII “IapMoly £061 North Carolina # In tho Superior Court, Iredell County # November Term 1903, Willie Inez Crowder # vs. it Judgment, Charles I. Crowder # This cause coming on to be heard at thig term of the Court before His Honor, W. R, Allen, Judge and a jury, and being heard, and the jury having resporsa to the issues submitted to them as follows:-— (1) Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes, (2) Did the defendant wilfully without cause abandon the plaintiff and live separate and apart from her as &lleged in the complaint? Answer:— Yes, (3) Has the plaintiff been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for five years next preceding the commencment of this action? Answer: Yes, It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff have the relief prayed for imothe complaint, and that the bonds of matrimony now existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be and the same are hereby disolved, and that the relation of husband and wife heretofor. existing between the plaintiff and the defendant, be and the same is hereby terminated, It is further considered and adjudged by the Court that the costs of this action, to be taxed by the Clerk of this Court bW paid by the plaintiff, Judge Presiding, {3 «I % antforad donot Nad ede OF % Ysrurod IfLebenl gobvworD son ef ffLLV "[ Sate “Iopmoip ‘SA ZOU] SITIM “IOpMoig w £061 4 A A ALI AA Cc eT Sg earnings Ise “SIUND 6061 ‘sa Allog “stun North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County November Term 1908 Jerry Curtis, plaintiff. vs Complaint. Maggie Curtis, defendsnt. The plaintiff compl@ains of the defendant and says; First. That he and the defendant intermarried about the year 1896 and lived together as man and wife until about the year 1903 Second. That there was born to them a child, now being cared for at Waffney, in the State of South Carolina. Third. That about the year 1903, without any cause or excuse therefor the defendant left the plaintiff and lived in adultery with one Ab Black, as his wife; that defendant has for the past two years lived in adultery with one Arthur Roberts, as his wife. Fourth. That he has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than.two. years next prececding the commencement of this action and the facts herein alleged have existed to his knowl- edge for more than six months next predeeding the filing of th Compleint. s Wherefore the plaintiff demands judgment, That the bonds of matrimont existing between himself and the defendant be dissolved; that the Court decree the custody of the child to the plaintiff and for such other and further re- leif as may be just and right. _ LL Lakh Attorney for Plaintiff OQ e 4. Y Z — i) go w. o 6061 Cr) c 4 - ose ~ a oO + — < < Y Jerry Curtis, plaintiff being duly sworn says; that the facts set forth in his foregoing Complaint are true to his own knowl edge and beleif; that the said Compaaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and the defendant, and not for the mere purpose of being freed from each other, and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the Complaint. That the facts set forth as grounds for divorce have existed to his knowledge for more than six months next preceeding the filing of this complaint a and that he has been a resicent of this State for more than tw years next preceeding the filing of this complaint. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the /Y day of SZ, Lee a Clerk Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N, C 4-21-’07-1M. County.--~In the Superior Court. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Stdte of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of FH, Wou are hereby Commanded to Summon at a Court to be held i the Coun at the Court House in on the...) ak the ce Monday of... Lh Poa of ‘ the same being the... day of , and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this AS day of PI of Superior Court County. assepl ‘SIUND sa Auljog ‘StuND 6061 “03 a1qeainzay P-LZJ JO WAND JOLIadng ay} jo ‘Ayunoy- > Peg LSNIVOV T1179 YOd SNOWWAS “AdUIONHY Syuureyg jo dep SIG} AUT sIOJaq paqtiosqns pu 0} UIOMS ‘suonnsexa mor ydutaxa Ayradoid puv sastiqet ‘syqap sty aaoqe pue 1940 Sie|[Op paipuny Om} jo uINs aq} YjIOM st aq shes GioMS Buteq (“1vg) (‘1e9) (-1eag) o6b1 ‘qd '‘y yo Aep Stq} ‘s[vos puke spuey ino ssonzI "uO1j08 SIq} Ut HUUe[g VY} Jo t9A00e1 Avr JUBPUIJ9Q] 9Y} SB 4S09 yons {8 juepuajeaq ay} Aed [eqs YUAe[I sy} Jt ‘TaAIMoY ‘PIOA aq 0} ‘suv{log gba jO WINS 9} Ut ‘MOTD SI} at UBpUazed 913 OJUN puNnog Saaasino sBpa;Mouyse 9 P 1 / LSNIVOV \ ‘Ajunod *‘yno|D s0yedng ay} UT] { “¥NITOUVYOD HLYNON 4O GL¥LS asseypy ‘SUNS sd Allof ‘stun 6061 O c = - Zz —_ > ga =. o 6061 O c + = ose @ 4 3 or) < w North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County ° November 21st 1908 Jerry Curtis, plaintiff vs Maggie Curtis, defendant. Jerry Curtis being duly sworn deposes and says; That in the’ above enectiled action now pending in the Superior Court of frre dell County, the Sheriff of said County has ~eturned the summons endorsed “Maggie Curtis is not to be found in Iredell County"; that the defendant therein cannot after due diligence be found within the State; that said defendant is a proper party to said action; that an action has been commenced in said Superior Court in said County for Divorce upon the grounds of adultery Wherefore the said paAintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in said County. Sworn to before me this the 2lst day of November 1908 O e& 4 Y > ge S. a 6061 OQ c a a — o 3 M< a Y Gtatewille NC. ), Mascot Publishing Company | VANCE NORWOOD, Lessee. The Evening Mascot The Iredell County Mascot MONDAYS AND THURSOAYS DAILY excePT SUNDAY Siotevile, NC oo UU Mascot Publishing Company § VANCE NORWOOD, Lessee. The Ebenings Mascot The Iredell County Mascot DAILY excerT SUNDAY MONDAYS AND THURSDAYS O cS “4 =. 7 oO + = te < A O c a = y go =. oe 6061 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Seulesvill NC OO Mascot Publishing Company | VANCE NORWOOD, Lessee. The Ebening Mascot The Iredell County Mascot DAILY excePT SUNDAY MONDAYS AND THURSDAYS pe - ¢& aca moe =o =. oF Ga «2 qe = OW 6061 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Sealewill NC. | i ans _ Mascot Publishing Company | VANCE NORWOOD, Lessee. The Ebening Mascot The Iredell County Mascot DAILY eExcePT SUNDAY MONDAYS AND THURSDAYS assep “SIND 2 c en = =. o + 4 4 < A 6061 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally | Selewill, NC, — v Mascot Publishing Campany | VANCE NORWOOD, Lessee. The Evening Mascot The Iredell County Mascot DAILY excePT SUNDAY MONDAYS AND THURSDAYS - c 4 = a oO = = we - ¥ OQ c 4 Se y’ ad nS =) se] 2 oO 6061 lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Salesvile, NE, >), Mascot Publishing Company ¢ S Bie Eisig i NORWOOD, ee ha ile MONDAYS AND THURSDAYS = () Cc B44 BB — oO = Jo «<< We, < oo 6061 ase ‘SHIND 6061 ‘sd Allo ‘stung NORTH CAROLINA | SUPERIOR cour?. IREDELL COUNTY I NOV, 25th, 1908. Jerry Curtis ~vVs- ORDER OF PUBLICATION, Mageie Curtis It appesring from the affidavit in this action, that Maggie Curtis, the defendant therein, is not to be found in Iredell Couty, and cannot after due diligence be found in the State, and it further sounielnc that the ac- tion is one for divorce for adultery; It is therefore ordered, that notice of this ac- tion be published once a week for six weeks in the Mascot, &® newspaper published in Iredell County, setting forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same, together with a brief recital of the subject matter of the same, and requir- hike the defendant to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County, to be held on the 5th Monday before the lst Monday in March, 1909, at the Court House in said County and answer or demur to the Complaint of the plaintiff, or the relief demanded will be granted. * Nov. 25th, 1908. Clerk Superior Court. Curtis, Jerry vs. Curtis, Maggie 1909 assepy ‘SIND 6061 ‘sa Aulog ‘stung NORTH CAROLINA { SUPERIOR COURT. IREDELL COUNTY } JAN. TERM, 1909. —) Jerry Curtis ~vs- COMPLAINT, Maggie Curtis. The plaintiff complains and says;- -First- That he and the defendant intermarried about or nine years ago in the City of Gaffney, in the of South carolina. ~Second- That they lived torether as man and wife until about four or five years ago, when the defendant, without cause separated herself from the plaintiff, and has not lived with him since as his wife. That there was born to plain- tiff and defendant three children, viz. lLandum, Roy and Thomes Curtis, now living in the State of South Carolina. - Thtrd~ That the defendant lived in adultery with one Alec Black for something over a year, and then lived and now lives in adultery with one Arthur Roberts. That plain- tiff has not at any time since said adulterous acts of de- fendant lived with her. -Fourth= That the pleintiff has been a resident of this State for more than three years prior to the beginning of this, ac- tion and has had knowledge of the acts of adultery of the assepy “SIND 6061 ‘sA Aloe ‘stung -2~ defendant for more than two years next preceding the corm~ encement of this action. WHEREFORE, he prays the Court: oe For a qAg RERUN Ron of the bonds of matrimony existing between himself and the defendant and that he have the custdgy and control of his three children. EC Cathucts an, Jerry Curtis being duly sworn says; that the facts set forth in the foregoing Compleint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; that said Complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and the defend- ant and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated fromeach other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes men- tioned in the Complaint ; that the facts set forth in the Complaint have existed to his knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of the Compleint and that he has been a resident of the State for more than two years next preceing the filing of the Complaint. Sworn to and subscribed in full before me \ this the ZZ aay of Decembgr 1908. yea ee J 2 5 - <= > ge =. o 6061 0 c a Z — oO 4 “<< <€ v i EF Res 5 zh SLE. GBS Scat ee ee 2 Jupere ames ress Se SE PE SS et EE Curtis, Jerry vs. Curtis, Maggie 1909 assepy ‘SHIND 6061 Cr & ~ pa § foe Come o = 4 << < a NORTH CAROLINA # IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, IREDELL COUNTY # JAN, TERM, 1909, Jerry Curtis ~vVs- JUDGMENT, Maggie Curtis. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, and being heard by His Honor, E.B. Jones, Judge, and a jury upon the whole record and the issues submitted to the jury, and the jury having found the issues so sub- mitted in favor of the plaintiff: 3 It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing he- tween Jerry Curtis and Maggie Curtis be dissolved and declar= ed of no effect and that the said Jerry Curtis be discharged and freed from all liability in any manner whatsoever towards the said Maggie Curtis. It is further ordered by the Court that the chil- dren of the said Jerry Curtis and Maggie Curtis be and remain under the control of and in the custody of Jerry Curtis. Curtis, Jerry vs. Curtis, Maggie 1909 Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Pricted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Original Summons, or other original process, including all RTE SII vaisins scntnndsocd Steksnabodcedbnises epliiedeliainiae Cia’ $1.00 APOE LOOM IMU WO SU oa ons cae bascc osrnvdsrsass dacecsesiadecs vedecccs 50 Order for enlarging time of pleading.......c.ccccscese cocsssce sseucscoceeee .25 NOOR RUNG ihe clas se Jes lace stances nua: 25 "Pitachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond and and Justification... ..... 1.00 I PAUP cist cid say Mt ies be a eta 1.00 DP@Nna, GACH NAME.........c.00000 veeeese acids ‘Sind pias obenionionnahiniadl wate 15 Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. OMNI fe i cechleasecnsinipcsiedipicipicsoiic’ hac Niu ue unk 80 ave o a Will, entering and docketing Ha ssuing Commission Affidavit, including Jurat and Certiticate...6. 21: AME eodborme «ee Bie Pe ip, ns / Per A oF b- TEE .cescorcncccsencseercesenspacessepeeceseeeresers sebereveccececesesesoncccens seacen = - a - es renee Nd Notice, for each name over one in same paper Impaneliog Jury || Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support Docketing same Docketing ex parte Proceedings “ Judgment. RI NG ici cscs. cccescenndctchacivectscncoucss Execution apd Sheriff's Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 6-15-06. || County Tax, when Jury impaneled Transcript to Supreme Court............ | Referee’s Allowance ‘stun “sA ALlof assepy “SHIND 6061 eee at CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS-CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) a cet cnaeetnorncnenr anaemia ee ae. gpg. ae Curtis, Jerry vs. Curtis, Maggie 1909 e2i[q curr ‘uoyeg "SA “H yor ‘uoyeg [l6I Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF County--GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON _.. John..Allison and Sam. Woods personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county at the Court House in... Statesville, N. next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of... the..plainti fer pila apan pay cl ake in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein Defendant... And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, ........... Jae FOPtneee , Clerk of our said Court, at office ih Statesville, N, bs Coy the Doosccccces ’ Clerk Superior Court for LE PLLL eZI[q ouer “uoyeq ‘SA "H yor ‘uoyeg [Tél -Term, r9@.Q. dowel la # eZI[q sues ‘UOyeEq ‘SA "H uyor ‘uoyeg [16I -County.--In the Superior Court. 7 a, ae SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. * , at a Court to be held for the 7 hs LAE Sy. pas at eT in af the. Monday after the. We tae _Monday of ? ay ae On J the same being the.72 ia ig _....--.----194_@_, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk 4f the tN, for said County, within the first three fail to answer to the said complaint within the orp ss above named, it SAL be found within youf County, to be and appear before the Judgg ef qur days of said Term, and let said Defendant__take notice if that time, the plaintiff__ will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the — Hereof fail nq, and of this summons make due return. y ofs< Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this_/- ‘3 y ff (f. YZ CLP MA (Lat oe / 5 A {Clerk of Superion et Z-C i f ELE County. “yuBpUezeg oy} quBepuezeq] oy SB 4SO0 0JUN puNog seajesano aZpa,MouyoIV 9 SIQ9P Sty sAoge puB IBAO PHU Sy} Ft “t9aemoy SIy} ‘s[ees pue spuey Ino ssouzT *‘Ajunog Returnable oA 7b ee P JO WINS 94} UI ‘UOT}OR SIqQ UI-~~ | ‘YNrIOUVD HLYON AO ALVLS “""""$1Y} OU e1OJEq PEeqLiosqns pu¥ 0} WIOME ““yguietg eu} Jo taAo0e1 Avu Received - VG oo Been dag. Le wis “jo Aep- ‘yanoD sz0lmedng ey} Uy *‘suoIpnoexe Wo Jdulexe Ayredoid pues seiqyiqet “UOT}O" SITY} UI” 6T ” quepueseq ey} Avd jreys ~~ eS 0g a = ° 3 & < we = @® Bs = ° * < = et a @ wm S 3 ° mh Od 4 ° = = 3 A =v 2. o a *PIOA 0q 0} ‘SiB]jOq ~~~ yons [[e- ~~~ Dalton, John H. vs. » Dalton, Jane Eliza 1911 ezI[q ouer “uoyed "SA "H uyor ‘uoyeg Tl6l 4 North Carolina # In the Superior Court, Iredell County # May Term 1910, John Henry Dalton, f ‘Plaintiff, # | “versus if Complaint. Jane Eliza Dalton, # D§fendant. ir 7 The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges:— | First That the plaintiff and the defendant, on or about the day of 19 » intermarried in said County and State, and ever since said time have been, and now sre husband and wife. Second That thereafter and after the plaintiff and defendant had lived together as husband and wife for something like two yeargor there— the defendant committed adultery, and wilfully and without cause and without any fault on the part of the plaintiff, separated herself from the plaintiff andabandoned him and lived in adultery, as plaintiff is advised and believes, has lived in adultery since he soparated herself from the plaintiff as aforesaid, . Third Tha’ h defendant prior to the time she abandoned the plaintiff asaid, committed adultery with John Allison; that the plaintifr » c + » 4} * ‘ f > > + sKwAmTY ) wy - _- : ver lived with the defendant as husband and wife after he was ad— vised that she had committed adultery as aforesaid, sed that she Fourth Car es Olina for eZ quer ‘uoyegq "SA “H yor ‘uoyeg [l6I as he may be entitled to in the premis; ecg Civili. 4 Oe 21 for ie Plaintiff, John Henry Dalton being duly sworn says that the foregoing complaint is true to his knowledge sand that the facts set forth in the Complaint aro true to the best of affiant's knowledre and belief, and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion betwoen hus— band» and wife, and not for the mere vurpose of being freed and sepa— rated from each Other, but in since: y i truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint: ef “© set forth in this com Plaint as perounds for divorce have ex to his knowledge at least six months prior to the f LhHis compla ‘int, and that Plaintiff two years nox regeding the complaint, subscribed before h Zor.) Superior Court, Dalton, John H. vs. Dalton, Jane Eliza 1911 ‘SA "HH gor ‘UoyeEGg [161 ezi[q cues “uoyeq Dalton, John H. vs. Dalton, Jane Eliza 1911 SB gilae( at is ne cue bo A Af) J 4) We So a) Poe eta / ; ; f 7 Ax lacs. teNf Ca 3 at kK 441-9 / i ‘ bx 4 6 > , — + , . ; , 5 yf Saw sas OPE sas Cae SAL Cece. 2 ct € heer — _—— * . é i. 5 ae 5) Pe 4h ct. on < Aeamenty Ae Pe. Fa a dhe tae thee anode Fort cee et “anh, diced. Spe, ee he ag eo AatecA | of Maal 8° Pome RO irtrte f— He ay ae f pee : a bb cs (ce 6 ee poe thi« __a< f ff 4 a Ce Amt _2tsn-7 2 Lé¢ A 4 f . a > FLAT UA 4 ¢ztcateidity / s : ? WA eee ee Oo ae = arms gut teEM ; fa : yf Cc ? F ed kor Cit Smee FPOCAMAD bmn ats tp . 4 Wy (+5 Being » OSC ce™ —S eo Le etd £é. ? ~ / CY € Ch t_ et. jf -<—.->* - & Ap \ 4 4 ae eal | /Lpireos YS ue Pectoral p /y aw. ( / Ad px Le (LL ABV Ate Ce eins < 7 4 f f 4 frr-e-4 ( Cie 4912£ 34 tf~—, (et —— ty jliwe~wv Rant tt CHALE kh Pe m ( sata oe fearon > yi , ‘ aT L f. Cgees Me ot Peis ? \ a . ¢ Kexaceg hhiint Ve: 7 ae Bent (acl aiis 4 cxtcengemeenemecrteineneee ORT Tem AT ? fr «Oe i ee . Mochi,» > lowes Aves -tthaf 2 ax (ha Lefe _ : b q , oe, Md pe CPi eee OE... fo a t & “ + Shy d 7 : 7 4 > ho BHaéeig <takd <-— Cre fO7EG Ohoug ee - Brot >" POooCe coce “ “Fe : : : sinaphede toh 4. ee | pe LE eee €. LOC 4 CE f aH a Fe. oD 4 Ta i ’ 2 y é a cea a detent wii Cte th Sect ht oY it ’ é / 3 7 . gL a 7 | CA 711 ~ H<+ fe Cx 4/0 ™. ¢ “eller serie rs CA: o> : a) » £9? 4 a carriages ; at Attila oF Bete Aabhblecmteciw CBicce-tet | iq /) C, + ee ‘ 7 P 4 ,. i a, | IGM ine eth. et ce? Che A€ge pa a ie, —e . oe : : a mangle | Zeoec UN Zt A Gea Che : PIC P= er fee. 4 f ( } . > if nS Srteces ak (Serge ret a Cartel Fe ¢ se dg < } . on 7 J ‘ i id ‘ at MEE Wa Cn atfpey~ tees err Ket Eine he 8 (te <d 4 n y 4 : —_ ei ; eo ~ Che Geeewe (Jie nCee Bical Pie ChE Ret wl f (Cotte ee re sh hai eeglauig ae ‘ tCH- 9 yr7 c Ces zs 4 / , —. oy) 4 ‘ eae / ——— fo 4 Ps Loa Ce-911- Ohne ee 4 : Ch f— Lhe Qa éiv et Fm , ; i . i gon a ija~o CAPITA L ane amet <ottan/ Bate fe ate ; “ ’ . cy, c ap ee ee f lA ce « RD cece et tl ge /\ CO te te < Litto 2 : 4 J : fey ¥ , , Laced. OL r Se tcc A iT CSPrrecer thang c 4 Fe pte fl< , ‘ @ / ' “ : Pn Ri q a a oe . se o #3 : ot 4 [Cher pt heise ld. Bhat hh SAP fie , s fy es ‘ ‘ ated ’ | UlLaere atts Piao <— tog E £. a s. CP ee et eet , — ry JP? we > Cg ¢ . iB - te ox a pur <= — ¢ c —e taw VEC TPP? COL Che Attics h eal, ZA) . Pos ae ya Ate (A317 4) He tt \ sayy 20 \ ‘ @p i) ate wt Ace sdaaa? a uye Otte oe Ke Cle 2 | fe ber a AW a. Ocebrr As f “as | gas ihe cy, kh Cll f det # bowel mi thot. Le. jfha£ = auf Gd ae. Garner, Gre Ld | Biss: Dp pee oO BL _ Wi es ae a a 4 7 09 a ee as Ss Oo Oo a > =~ S 7 < # £061 SUMIMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 3-29-’011M County.--In the Superior Court. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ¢ State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of c the Defendant above named, ak be Pr yotett within your Ccunty, to be and appear before the Judge t-ver- Superior Court, at a Coupt to be held for the County of at the t House in . gn, the Monday after the Monday of the same being the GF and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of. the Superior Court for said C ounty, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendunt take notice if ... fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 7 J day of en. 190. 2a ck: AML Le. Lew CL. Clerk bedi Court La c At . County. ePV “Joysiq SA “7 ‘f “Toysiq £061 corning nit - ri nm ‘Ayunoz 0} a[quunjzoy ogy be JO }nN0D s01adng ayy jo Ie” Ly 2 3S. seo PeATI09yT ‘Aausoyy s$nureypg / daITaY UOd SNOMWDS Se enineeieesmeneteeieeitleeeey- ces . ¥ 061 ‘may : 5 x * fo fop $14} aut a40 fog pagisosqns puv 0 usoms “suounoaxa mods yduaxa Ajsadoad pun $a1}111901) ‘$3gap sty anogn pun 4900 S4D]]0p paaspuny om} yo wns ay} Yj40M $1 ay shvs Usoms 6urag ("jpeg ) » (*ppag) ("ypag) 061 ‘ad ‘V fo hop S14} ‘S]Das pun spuny sno ssoupiy "u01jaD sy} ut Hiyumjyg 9y3 fo 2an0004 Row qup ~puasag ay} sp 4809 yans 7]0 junpuafag ay} find ppoys Hyung yj fi ‘4anamoy ‘proa aq 04 ‘sanjj0q , 40 WNS AY} Ul “UoNOD sy) ut yuDpuasog ay; ojun punog sanjas.ano abpajmouyan ay LSNIVOV \ ALNNOD "J4no) 4orsadng ayy uy “¥NITONVD HLYON 4O GUL¥LS PV “JOYsiC] “SA ae ‘Toysiq £061 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County November Term, 1903. Je E. Disher, plaintiff vs Complaint. Ada Disher, defendant. The plaintiff complains and says: (22: That he is a citizen and Besident of the City of Statesville, County of Iredell and State of worth carolina, and has been for some time; that the defendant is a ritizen and resident of the town of Lex ington, County of Davidson and State of yorth Carolina. (2) That on the 24th day of ceptember 1903, while plaintiff was engaged at his work with The Key Furniture Company in said City of Statesville, Lee pord and Ford, brothers of the defendant came to Stawweviiie, erosmresd @ warrant to be issued for the plaintiff, the same served upon him, and then had themselves deputed to hold plaintiff in custody and for him to accompany them to the town of Lexington, where they live and where the defendant lives, for the purpose of compelling the plaintiff to marry their sister, the defend ant in this action. (3) That after their arrival at said town of Lexington, the father of the defendant joined them, and the three Fords,father and brothers as afopesaid of the defendant, by intimidation, threats and force com pelled the plaintiff, against his will, and after his repeated asser- tions that he had not promised to marry the ddfendant, to marry the defendant, said father and brothers swearing that they would kill the plaintiff, they then being armed and prepared to carry their threats into execution. That at the time the plaintiff was unarmed and had no nea€s’ of protecting himself against their assaults. @.. That upon his request that he be permitted to consult co -l- 00 xs > > BR > Sm < ¥ £061 he was told by the father and brother of the defendant , that no such request would be granted and that they would not delay the settle» ment of the matter any longer and plaintiff being so situated, threas ened and overpowered and believing said threats would be carried into execution, and plaintiff thereby loose his life, plaintiff unwilling- iy and under protest married the defendant on the 24th day of Septem- ber 1903. That no contract of marriage had ever existed between the plain- tiff and the defendant prior to that time. (4) That since said marriage the plaintiff had separated himself from and lived separate and apart from the defendant. Wherefore the plaintiff demands judgment. ( (1) That the bonds of matrimony so unlawfully and forcibly placed upon him be dissolwed and declared null and void, because of the du- ress imposed upon the plaintiff before and at the time of said mar- riage. (2) That plaintiff be freed from any and all liability and responsi- bility to the defendant. (3) For the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court and for suc§ other and further relief, as may be just and right. LC hth Counsel for Plaintiff. Je BE. Disher being duly sworn, deposes and says, that the forefoing complaint and every part thereof is true as of his own knowledge ox- cept those matters and things stated therein upon information and belief and as to those he believes it to be true. aQu BPV “I9Y4sIq ‘SA “7 “f “Ioysiq £061 Sworn to and subscribed before me this the /O day of bts 1903. f€ higher J. EB. Disher, plaintiff ' vs Affidavit. i { Ada Disher, defendant Je BE. Disher being duly sworn, deposes and says, that the facts set forth in the foregoing Complaint are true to the best of his knowl- edge and belief, end that said Complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and his said wife, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sinceri- ty and thruth for the causes mentioned in the Complaint, that plaine tiff has been a resident of the State for many years ,prior to the fiz ing of this Complainte Sworn to and subscribed before me this / 9 day of lex 1903. £ i Qiedin,, lie Ll 4 " 2 J Siciedic ovths LGC. Se Ce epy ‘Joysiq SA “q ‘f “IOYysiq £061 21 -/Gd6— , Statesville, N. (, 2-1-'96-1m. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT: County. Judgment Against : | " Judgment | | | / ¢ Original Summons. or other original procegs, including all names therein A Vad Shak euagedautapeaeoan’’ gees dune h Lace Every copy of same.................. Bond. including Justifi tion Appeal from Clerk to Judge. ‘ Order for enlarging time of MOP, cccccicqaitic sp coy era Interlocutory Orders Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian Continuance. Caveat toa Will, entering and docketing.............. x edidaiedundbad casas Issuing Commission ! Notice | | Notice, for each name over one in same paper }, Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided aes final in term time Docketing ex parte Proceedings . Summons Indexing Judgment Filing Papers Postage, actual Execution fnd Sheriff's Return | | ee Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal | : > | Transcript to Supreme Court, ..... ...copy sheets, each... .. paadsen | County Tax, when Jury impaneled i] ! Referee’s Allowanee....,...... SO siipiiaseMetbercal | Constable | | Magistrate .. | Plaintiff's Witnesses Defendant's Witnesses jsuivd py (‘apoD 941 & paxy sp ) [tat)—sjso) fo ytgq ‘19990 TIAID sseeceneeceeneseen Ay Disher, J. E. vs. Disher, Ada _— 1903 engage in the pertioue, _- ordered to report himeelf ‘ew Orleans, but an to retarn home end le, na derdied hi ession, and his proficiency we* cumstances. aa UR ork | Jis first exploits in where Geo. Hi apeain ) Cause » SO VIC 33 > ad to-Oh jeultural pursuits. das vorfalfriénds, and the know 5 ‘ih his being reinstalss “was age’ vations of the camp- which port he remained i he was prom riod until 1832, hi country oD the Western during tempore” , wife. In” “tary root ~otoy/ engage in the perilous, | ordered to report himself to*Ggnere ew Orleans, buf an attack of the yellow te, to return home and recryit bis ‘ le, he devated himself assiduously to the stud, ession, and his proficiency W iD uumstances. 7 dis first exploits in arms . Harrison ¥ sylor was attached to Gen. Hlarrison’s force arched against the Indians, and he di ished himself ‘ith so much bravery as to win the highest esteem of his ommander. They were appreciated by resident Madison, “ soe — gare bint a cumin « os. : the sprin: 1812, Captain rr was “placed 10 comman' of Fort arrison, on tk a Patash, and at this period incu bis career 38 8 plary eos tae He d i tly against & system attack of the savage ich he ived the rthanks of the Presi- dent, conferred Upon him@the. rank of Major by bre- } yet. He furtherdis ingul during the war, but at its close, the injustice of government ing reduced to the simplevank of Captain ) taused him to throw up his com- mission and quit the service; and he re dto-his family, and re-engaged i ic arsuits. Oe eae The influence of powerfat fri nda, and the kno\ of his great services, resulted ‘ih his being reinsta i ae President Madison, and ie 1816 be gourse of the yeast, by lied from the bosom of his family to endure’ the | was again ca rivations of thecamp. +40 was ordered to Green Bay, at which port he remained in command four years. In 1819,’ he was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. From that period until 1832, he was in * ~otant. service of b* country on the Western and ‘during tempore wife. In *’ “tary ro°? aeetn engage in the périlou, yrdered to report himself to*Ggneru. ew Orleans, buf an attack of the yellow te. to return home and De. le, he, devated himself assiduously ession, and his proficiency wee soon m umstances. Jis first exploits in ioe, where Gen. Harrison ¥ sylor was attached to Gen., Harriso arched against the Indians, and be distingu ith so much bravery a8 to win the hi ommander. They were appreciated by resident who soon after gave him 8 captain’s commission. Early in the spring of 1812, Captain ‘Taylor wes -placed in command of Fort Harrison, on the * abash, and at this period com- ilitary com er, He defended attack of the savage -_ sed his career 28 & Mt this, Pou tt foe, for*whi oe ther. thanks of the Presi- dent, who conferrgd upon im/'the. rank of Major by bre- } yet. He further-distingul himself duri r, but at its close, the idjustice simple vank of Captain ) caused hi mission and quit the service ; and he re and re-engaged in-agricultural pursuits. ure The influence of powerful friénds, and the knowlegs of |... /f his great services, resulted ‘ih his being reinstate i a4 ¥ gourse of the yeat, by President Madison, andi 18 , was-again called from the bosom of his family to endure ‘the He was ordered to Green Bay, at ur years. In 1819, rivations of the camp. d in command fo nt-Colonel. From which port he remaine 4 to the rank of Lieutenal -otant. service of bi he was promote that period until 1832, he was in * country on the Western and during tempore” wife. In’ “tary ro°e *=oto recruit bis krealth.- to the study of ade manifest by » "SA SETS ‘uemystg © pe wn —- 3 ® be j rt) = | Qa. p a air ke pa) ta hed AeF ene. ot a. fac Lhe; ges Oper te CPE. Gs CEL ia : eae scnitnscti oitdi o. K, mer A Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally CLD aD ‘a sacee, Af? ae Mee Lzeunee. a oa fpCAeTJS Cte tam D Z, i geie ens Ue para ee Ze Pttcre- a ee 7 fpr fete gnk. Atc7 Jee wee ape C heirs tbe By ed Pe Cott 2a as AP-Lo ox. gee ee ccs ee eee Ti pn Se ) me eee eee ng. Le zee fae ee = af + 444, oS =o ‘i toda - wcll Saal Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally td epuruy ‘ueuyst¢ °SA Sets fuewys Oo pie a ot =| rv) pa oe nn . 7) wb Yn oe . A aT a4 MV 2. AS A hide wee hie “4 , if... C8 i) t/ WO CO Anny gy Petree - 4 Es ) Ate pee = € 7 Usa GeTQ a | ferlogt eer (72th © be wn = eS ey 3 ad fo 2 Q fp < “a Oo be w 7 3 ~ pe | oe wy be bw @ o ve fog e Acre af Aud 4rt4 Ber At a €b Ax Th Leto 24 Feiee ne) ce fe é ee / MUNaZ ScTS QD (fev Cregt hy /25 t bd ~ HAVEL Cg Lek ap. 4A? Py weed i amet it ac a tl ~ ee - - Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally i” LAD: ALL sink eal ae aoe ae oD) ee Athy. Z « C GELAG) EDD e444 GC Et bf cx-ee Dy Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally sy Ms et th ted en me A ~ co fs pees RA Sted ig Vine Mpg epueuy ‘uPuYySstq "SA SeltS ‘urwystg Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally watt saphena orati eennet er t ee otete re = = oe 3 8 » < p ~ as - . a - he ~@ 4 3 oo a a @ ‘Please Note: Document( Repeated Intentionally ee. . inp kc A | liste-Ctr 1 Ve Cie LR Ez, Thi aes GPO AT frre IE SP a Win Th fact Merce. Z Bethe Ligh 22122-Zez Cifce frberr; hey fctetedar 3 ee Hefei ip ol 414d rir ey Se folae A eer is Tle Me La Ee ww ican pean) see or ey lr2c0e cP ~ JP Pe hee cu ff paca ice jaw 7? t<ze— Clt4e22 ee a eee GF et ao 4a ficz2 oy 1 ; i : # . : j : : ; t : ’ ok Leck are ne CertCa a =. ae a Kas Thr i aa Jbrd Prey pee Phe 2t ty tet * | petit LAD) Fe, fn eZ > hipaa? Tp xe CPBAtb.6 04 bas Afar polos Lettie. 4 Ly i. Mihai gh eT feels A a Li.clectlnaun LreZh, CD Lit ho Ab fC te 22 eh ez JIL Att ote Saag ; wee | Fralt, Hen f FFE | cia a A. Cle leet Guwnw lH Sewn 1 POS Le Dida tottt. Am SR (M<21< fact. Qler1y. ek he flan tify a> hfe Sank. tee Ab g-Be Hy fbn a-4% 4, Wer. TPAC F9 ey an ta ve. Oe or ; Os Be Gin /fT/ fens ae S- P+2 hn Cocee-L, 4 Ge tc lead 2d Cho eceinne Lowa tae Mid Sao.k Fe ha Cec liocce dD a (PE Perce oo 2 Ot4.A, Sickie auld Biren tae ne im, ae om - 7. / x tipple AE. J / / if \ ; ; q j 2 } as Lpeee ff FE- ae i Dixon, William vs. Dixon, Linda Dy Eo 000 Be vos Culellel, Cater Khir Ma? Le Delituta’ Mien Jt 2b) Ge ae " 4 | i Tk | fe Ke. Cow a tue lea, a Cekwwast | Cat fn ; that be Fe a ees (foe cet plot Hffat Md Rinne ee, . * a ae b/s? TP PTR pre vs. : Dobson, Julia A. o Ss 8 P< es & a) be ® : ee X~ Ae x Filcceg Crrv feta cx / poe . 4 ~~ eee SAHeliece, S Or Le, a Cen a Ltere ang hs Fm ahgoneck, haek or he f 6x art SU& - crn Pe ccctlac. Ad: es 26. Pyupp ek / Pa acria tc a Oa neice cas nan hdina eRNERReaR RnR SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 3-1§- 13-1M. Grew County~-~ In the Superior Court, AGAINST DAL. Beh asta ea oe bs 22 3 CADW O — / SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. To the Sheriff of ete St LIA the defendant ...above named, if. Ky be found within your Cannty, to,be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held i SeasCousity on Cx £ A. .at the PABA oi the ee House in agi Z. acu EG OU. Ron chess the same being the 2 day of fle Ig! and answer the compldint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of tif Clerk of/the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant =... Monday take notice if.............they fail to answer to the said complaint will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 42 day of byes ze Ig! 3 KALQITVL125. A q Ay 7 / f/-/ E Clerk of Superior Court Z (£ & CLE within that time, the plaintiff nty. Si ig 6 PP ios =o 5B 3.5 Qe 7 rlél ~~ 33ea ty BOT JO 31n0> JOLadng 9y3 jo Uy 1) ‘JJITIA NOI SNOWNAS ry NL) cy 5 5 Me n ; ~ > ‘ R . e | S S ~ 161 jo Aep 314} SUI a10Jaq paqliosqns pue 0} nIOMG ‘sMoljnoaxe Woly ydutaxa Aysadoid puv sarjt]1qeI] ‘s}qap sty aaoqe pue 12A0 SIe[[Op paipung OM} jo Uns 94} 4II0M st aq SsAh¥s DIOMS Buleq (jag) (189g) (1e@g) 161 ‘q'‘V jo Aep SI} ‘s[vas pue spuey Ino ssany A "MO1}0B SIy} UI™ Yyarelg 24} Jo 1aA0oa1 Avu JUBpUrjaq] at] SB ys00 yons |[e juepurjaq ay} Aed {eqs os : yuurelg aq} yt ‘aAamoy *pIOA 9q 0} ‘sie[[od ‘JO Uns 94} Ut “UOT}De stg} Ut jaepuajsg 243 “OJUN puNnog Saalasino adpa;Mouyov 394, ‘ONOS& LSNIVOV (‘Ayunod ( *¥NITONVD HLNON JO SUL¥LS ‘ynOD s0uadng aq} uy owe] uosgod ‘sa dwiog “uosqod ri6l ee ore] uosgoqd ‘sa duiog “uosqod rlél i ‘ ¥ North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County. June 12th 1913 Pomp Dobson, plaintiff. -vVs- COMPLAINT. Mamie J.Dobson, defendant. | The plaintiff above named complaining of the defendant ,for cause of action alleges and saye: Firet. That on the 5” day of 4, 1£ 94 jin the county and State aforesaid, plaintiff and defendant intermar- ried ,and ever since have been ,and now are,husband and wife. Second. That the plaintiff ise and has been a resident this Stete all hie life ,and that he is now.s°S yeare of age. Third. That on or about November 12th 1918., the defendant ,without ee ,going with one Walter Brandon to the city of tate ES ine State of Anz. +, That said an and said Walter Brandon lived together in the city of cherish” a for several months after said 12th day of November 1912., living and cohabiting together as man and wife , as plaintiff ie advised and belie- ves. Fourth. That the abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant ,and her living and cohabiting with the said Walter Brandon was without the consent,connivance or procure- ment of plaintiff ,and that plaintiff had not cohabited with the defendant since she abandoned plaintiff and lived and cohabited with the said Walter Brandon,as aforesaid. Fifth. That the issue of said marriage of the rlaintiff and defendant ,are an children as followe , to wits Voc eli, Bamtee nna 4G a ed, Pe. Lica ud jon, 4 ¥ a “r Pe cr < Oar, ¥ tee. "4 , Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment ,that the bonds of i matrimony between himself and the defendant be dissolved ,and q that the custody of the children be awarded to plaintiff. For costs of action to be taxed by the clerk of this igs Ree .. Attorney for plaintiff. Pomp Dobson ,after being duly sworn eays; That the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true of his own knowledge except as to those set forth on information and belief ,and as to those he believes them to be true;that said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and his wife ,nor is it made for the mear purpose of being freed and separated from each other ,but in sincerity and truth for the causes set forth and mentioned in said complaint . That said facte have existed to the knowledge of plaintiff for at least six months before the filing of this complaint ,and that plaintiff hae been a reident of the State of Notth Carolina for more than two yeare ne¢@t preseeding the commencment of this action and the filing of thie complaint. This June 12th 1913. wy anf gis ek. Ln. Plaintiff. Subscribed and sworn to before me hye PY pth say of June pl913. , ly ALNALLA LMU & Lp Io.8.0. omey| uosqod ‘sa duiog “uosqod Priel oe wosgogd ‘sa duog “uosqod rlél er ne ene enna North Carolina ] Superior Court Iredell County. Jf June loth 1913 Pomp Dobson } | va | Notice of service of summons by publication yamie J.Dobeon | The defendant above named will take notice that an action entitled as above has been commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County ; that the object of said action is to secure the disolution of the bonde of matrimony existing between the defendant and plaintiff on the grounds of adultery on the part of the defendant . pefendant will further take notice that she is required to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County at the court house in said county on the Fifth Monday before the First Monday in September 1913., same being the 28th day of July 1913., and that she is required then and there to anewer or demur to the complaint , or the zm- xiafxmumandeadxky plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief.demanded in his complaint. This the 10th day of June a y ) E Lay, q . op A IMM bE Clerk Superior Court Iredell County qrueyy “uosqod ‘sa duiog “Uosqod rlé6l North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County. June 10th 1913. Pomp Dobson vs ORDER OF PUBLICATION. yamie J.Dobson It appearing from the affidavit of Pomp Dobson ,plaintiff in thie action ,that Mamie J.Dobeon defén- ant therein , can not after due diligence be found within the State ; and it further appearing that said is action is for the purpose of securing a divorce on the ground of adultery of the defendant who is the wife of plaintiff : It ie therefore ordered ,that a notice of this action be published one a week for four weeks in the Statesville Sentirel ,a news paper published in Iredell County setting fourth the title of the action ,the purpose of the same together with a brief recital of the subject matter of the same, and requireing the defendant to appear at the next term of the Superior Court of Iredell County , to be held on the 5th Monday before the First Monday in September ,eame being the 28th day of July 1913., at the court house in said county ,and answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff , or the relief demanded therein will be granted Wal ta aoe This June 10th 1913. MV 4 Lift ; thc Clerk Supefior Seest Iredell County. swe “uosqgod sa dwiog ‘uosqod rl6l AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE OF SUMMONS BY North Carolina 1 Superior Court Iredell County. | June 10th 1913 Pomp Dobson i ve j | Mamie J.Dobson PUBLICATION. Pomp Dobson plaintiff above named after being duly eworn says: That in the above entitled action now pending in the Superior court of Iredell county ,the sheriff has returned the summons issued to him in said action endorsed" Mamie J.Dobson defendant not ‘to be “found in Iredell County "; that the défendant therein can not after due diligence be found within the State; that the said defendant is a necessary and proper party to said action the object of which is to secure a divorce on the grounde of adultery ‘committed by the dfendant who is the wife of plain- tiff. Wherefore plaintiff prays that an order be made by the court that service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some news paper p blished in Iredell county , N.C. This June 10th 1913. , Gs spy Sow. Ron ne ea AO , Affiant . ht OO treo <Q pee ee Gennes (OC Re Le“ 2 42 - “Oth LIV Bee a DO je HC SFLO ‘ oY —— oo 656 PP Zo es 3.5 QO 4 rlél of Coste—Civil,—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N Docket... Cabo ae Sr ge. tg CL mn RAMEE RE ~ Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification . . BS NN GET cae a get WN MEM I ee ee : | judgment! final be SEER se ge Sees : a Judgment f final Cue OM ok ee .§0 : Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support. -.-'- - so}]__. neo | Dos! RO APRs ees: shee bk KOSS A SSE ae -25}}. & | De <ing' ex parte Proceedings. .---:-:' °° °° cs) | Y re SEAR nc eke st A ole Dee .25) - SRNR a8 ge Oe ey -251---- a Sacites MUMNER. 5 Se Sheet 10} daa EMI ou, tail oe 8) Sp Ee ol Postage, actual... -- - Ee Transcript of ARN 8 rss) eee os ok ee 2s ot a S Lexectition afd Sheriff's Return. . .-- +> ° oh VO | Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal a. Transcript to Supreme Court. . . - copy sheets, each.. = - 10}. --- County Tax, when Jury impareled Refesee’s Allowance . - eels ek Medd ipa ip f is , Constable ¢ Magitmte..--s+-+-s 5% i Witnesses... .- - | | Defendant’s Witnesses. ! : He ee bh — — ————— ~ err ep ES SE i ee [Original Summons, or other original process, nding all canaee — nn ee L -25 i]---- i .25}]---~ pany 25 a .50]] _- ry 1.00} __ . 1.00]] | ce -18--- “ie ea * Ti ON a EARS, sims Clerk. . ———_= CIVIL DOCKET. Ss | | BILL OF COSTS--GIVIL ft Z a _ (AsPlued by the Code. ) ; ; > Amen ay SEM, ; : Ba Deere! ne ne Ny ‘.* ¥ \ } = : Against * ; << i H.....3 bee it? pine mre pve se art Dobson, Pomp vs. Dobson, Mamie 1914 Pomp Dobson ve. Issues. mamie J.Dobson . First. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry and live together as hueband and wife as alleged in the complaint? Answer. Y LQ. Second. Is the plaintiff a resident of the State of North Carolina ,and hag he resided in said State for more than two years before the commencment of this action ,as alleged in Answer fee a in Third. the complaint ? Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and live \ and cohabit with Walter Brandon as‘alleged in the complaint ? J Answer. FLO/. one “uosqod ‘sa duog “uosqoc] rlél Dobson, Pomp vs. Dobson, Mamie 1914 srureyy “Uosqod ‘sa dwiog “uosqoqd rlél North Carolina { In The Superior Court Iredell County. {| Jany Term 1914. Pomp Dobson { va. { JUDGMENT . Midd Dobson j Thie cause coming on to be heard and being heard before his Honor W.F.Harding Judge presiding and a jury, and His Homor having submitted the issues set out in the record and the jury having answered the issues in favor of the plaintiff as set out in the record: It is therefore considered,adjudged and decreed that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plain- tiff.and defendant be,and the same are,hereby disolved and anulled . tt is further considered ,adjudged and decreed that the custody and tuition of the children of said ma~ rriage be and the same is hereby awarded to the plain- tiff Pomp Dobeon free and diecharged from the inter fer-- anee or control of the said Mamie Dodson . Let the costes of this action be paid by the plaintiff. | Mdlug . ama Judge presiding. a Dobson, Pomp vs. Dobson, Mamie 1914 ‘Wd Ppog ‘SA “7 “7 “Ppoq L061 North Qarolina,* In the Superior Court <. Iredell GVounty.: October Term-1907, E.L.Dodd + vs. E.M.Dodd. The Plaintiff comphaining of the defendant all 8 and says: 1. eee iD. the year 190) on the 27th a of hot Ml defendant Complaint ; county,N.C.,and thence forward from that time until the present time the marriage relation has existed between the said parties. 2. That during the month of September,1904 the said E.M.Dodd deserted the said phaintiff and left the State of North Carolina and went to the State of South Carolina,where on the Srd day of December,1906 the said E.M.Dodd was ngs esery to Ida Bostic by Rev.G.M.Rogers of Anderson,S.C. and that the said E.M.Dodd at once after said illegal marriage,began to live with the said Ida Bostic as man and wife and aa livefn Kauitry with the said Ida Bostic. 3 . That the said plaintiff has not lived with the said E.M.Dodd nor had any communication tthobh the said E.M.Dodd since the time of his illegal marriage with the said Ida Bostic and has in no way condoned the offense. Wherefore the plaintiff prays the court to grant an order divorcing the said E.L.Dodd from her said husband E,M.Dodd on account of his living in adultry as aforesaid,and that the clerk tax the cost of this action according to law. A, ly { Pee Ps alia, J shale for the Pidintart . E.L.Dodd being sworn deposes. and says: That the fackh. set forth in the foregoing complaint are trpe to the best of her knowledge and belief ,except as to those matters stated therein on information and belief and as to those matters she believes tnd to be true=- that she has filed the said complaint not out of levity nor collusion between the said husband and wife- and not for the mere purpose of freeing and separating the said husband and wife,but in sincerety and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint- that the said facts have existed to the knowledge of the affiant for at least six months prior to the filing of thie complaint and the said wife has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for t@ years next preceding the filing of this complaint. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the Sist day Tie.. August , 1907 44 he 4 : eM hetne Prbl se ‘Wd ‘Ppog ‘SA “T “9 ‘ppod L061 dhliot) 5 Rn et Sas ee eeae Le North Garolina,: ty the Superior Court - Iredell County.: October Term-1907, E,L,Dodd : vs : Affidavit. E.M Dodd. 3 | v E.L.Dodd,being duly sworn,deposes and says: That in the above entitled action now pending in the superior court of Iredell county,the sheriff of said county has returned the summons issued to him in said action endorsed "k.M.Dodd not to be found in the county"; that the defendant therein after due diligence cannot be found within the State;that the said BMtarnra 6 rk. defendant is a proper party to said action, is for divorce ;wherefore the said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the court that # service of summons be made on the said defendant by publication in some te Affiant . newspaper published in Iredell county,N.C. This the 3lst day of August ,1907. Sworn to before me this the Slst day of August,1907 ya p~ Lr nr Cou 7 7 al to fdor of Eh heedd vor 2. Vt Mokh | ce ee pra A Li 7, Me ee, bf he $Me ER, aisle, gat se ae Ge opfrr al Gr Be lon _| tpn . 7 RA Ly b ftp | afte. Mp rt at 9 3H Mi! Lh oye he Liver, (te 7, al Me noe ee 4 a! ee, MEG Bok Be] SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant ...above named, if our Superior Court, at a Court to be helg for the County of....// “74-24 at the Sourt House in oy \ ba...0m the: Sf ak... .Monday after the the same being the. Tay OF -neesensnesan-t en 190.2, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first. three days of said Term, and let said Defendant..._...take notice if Crna, Seey fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. 0} B[qBUIN{a xy 431778 YO SNOWWAS Bee eS - 2g. 5. ae | he o a a 8 9 M4 5 3 Ss o * SIY} Sut a10jaq peqiiosqns puv 0} uIOMG ‘SdoHNIexe WoIZ ydutaxa Ajz19do1d pu SPT TIqet] ‘s}qap sty aaoqe pue 13A0 SIPT[OP pespuny OM} jo urns ay} yWIOM St ay skvs aioMs Sutaq- (1eag): (Teas) (19g) 061 “gq ‘yw “yo Aep S14) ‘s[eas pus spuey ino ssamq\ "UOH}OB Sty} UL PHU PY} JO Joaooer Av ‘JUepuajaq 24} se ys0D yons [ee jepusjaq] aq} Aed [jeqs” , ' en BYU 21} Jt ‘FaAaMoy ‘PIOA aq 0} ‘sieT[oq" ST ee ; JO TONS 843 Uy ‘MONDE sty} oF ""yORpuajaq aq} 0}0N Puno saalasino a8paymouyoe oy, LSNIVOV *Ayanod ‘NOD s0padng aq} uy “¥NITOUYO HLNON 4O AL¥YLS 4 = Buchs ar —- eet ented ae oo lerd th EL, faded iA4_ leas, | 2 me, oh Le ES a ' Ce ws 4. BA pw b> | ‘ i i iy i} hy at € , at i L061 ‘Wd “Ppog ‘SA "7 “A “ppog ‘SA "7 “9 “ppog L061 ‘Wd “Ppog |. Cos ee os | a. bo Dodd, E. L. vs. Dodd, E. M. 1907 Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Prirted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Original Summons, or — original process, including all names therein . $1.0 Every copy of same. Bond, including Justi Order for enlarging time of pleading ‘Wd Ppog SA “T “” ‘ppoq Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in L061 iotifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. . ‘ontinuance Caveat to a-Will, entering and docketing. Issuing Commission ...................... Mpnbbskelskwalecscns Notice, for each name over one in same paper Impaneling Jury Judgment final in term time............. Judgment final before Clerk............ Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support... Docketing same || County Tax, when Jury impaneled Referee’s Allowance. WOE css Secale CIVIL DOCKET. OF COSTS—CIVIL. (As fixed by the Code.) r Shed CANT. SBT 2 Thee ion é 34 3 a “J Beret 3 ‘ena Sahai il “TH ‘Aid "SA BYOTIZ ‘AIG 1061 Nps eae NNER Se EN , Summons For Relief. State of Worth Carolina. Go the Sheriff of eve Leomey --- Greeting: You are hereby Commanded (0 Suimmon..... pes SOOO Bee tee ROH e we HEHE HO ee HR eee eee ee sees May maWer Paveseece ee SOCOM EF OH HOH O es FEEDS SHH HHEeEs FEHOEE TREES OHEOEDEDS CHR OEE SES SEOOOOH ES HOOOEE OES HOOCS CHOSE DOES OOO EEE SECC Oe HOEvES ceeee POCO HHH EEE Lee HOHE HOE EHH ODS HOE EHOEES Hed rat MOOOED OEE HEE OES SE OHEOOS OS EETEEES OH SOES FEOEOS OE OOS oeEe HeUeeeteees SPP RCEDE HOHE HORE Heme eee ee HH e eH Heer SHES HHEEEES HOEOOOHRS BH OEEE HEOOES HEEOHOHEEEESD SHES" SHOE Oy HOO es sO eee OSEE Eee se Besos COTOE HHH RHEE He EEO eee Ee HHH OH EEH OES OO OED E SH SHH SHEHES SEO EEESS HHEOHEOHs CORTE OBES BEOOES OUTED EO OOS SECS Oe COE eee Sreees Teeter eee eee eee eee ee eee eee THA ROMER H ETOH ETH EHEEES HH HEHEHE SETHE EHS HEEOEESEE © FHHHSSH SOROTEEOS THRESEOE: SHEHEEEES EOOEES EEHESSOHSEEHS: SEEeee oeeeee the Defendant _@tmtibove named, if ain tele found within your County. to be and appear be- fore the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court tobe held forthe County of . O22 LE- 4 at the Court House in Ate verti. on the GFL. Monday after the Monday of f 2 the same being the I~ _dayof Mip+~_ and an- swer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court {or for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice that of Re. _fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com plaint. Hereof fai not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, thi: Clerk of & erior Court County. @CTHCE OF NORTH CAROLINA... . AGAINST. We acknowledge ourselves bound unto. . the defendant in this action, in the sum of , . plaintiff. . . in this action. Witness our hands and seals, this. . . "7 H ‘Aq "SA BYOIZ ‘AIG 1061 % AGAINST NS FOR RELIEF. | Returnable to 8 of the Superior Court of t eo RR Bl te a ts +» COUNTY. Inthe Superior Court, BOND. v 4 ys ek cg ee one CORON hg panei Oban ar ts Dollars, to be avoid, however, if the plaintiff... . .. . ot ie . Shall pay the defendant . . . all such cost as the defendant. . . niay recover of the . day of . A.D. 9). | ek RE Mw LANE ak Can aah cy ee . (SEAL,) Hs heh eee alata oe hig: bhai goer ous AUER kava . . (SBAL,) > . (SEAT,.) oa A be ~™~ } i e A) _ a ene wae eas, « eases. sed : s - yee ee, 3 7 * } 2 ' ~ % ‘ i = ty = - ' Received ; lt IE exces m sank: Nortn Carolina, In the Superior ourt . [redéll County. Liletta. Dry- ) Pt Go 4 "Oo ee cr . 73 o ty = o > a “ yey Affidavit ee eke ia ee ass ae a a ’ ae : ; dei ALLetia «ULV ,~PsA@INTLILI aAoove napea ,ceins auLY SWOrR devoses and says : That in the above entitled action now pending i: s 5 uf ss . : Tne Superior “ourt of Iredell sunty,the Sheriff of sai Count} has Z i e j ! w retulr i the summo £ ed 4 im in said actic ndorsed H#Net T ‘ 1 « a Hs iss Dt Ot to be o t oun after i LI Ence ,sa to r tat " cm . . / eee ‘ . } 1 Tt 31 v) ALE ; Liha Sa e C Ca } t C A i en ¢ be fou within tae State; tana S defe MiDs ot : . ape , ee ‘ : +3 ok tid : a ti b > i C c s " A VA 3 t OF toa 54a nt r 7 ie até % t yner re tae Sala 4 t i i v A Orcer e nea ) ‘ S our acti aCGC oN es rm 2 : . - - > > 7 ? " > . a” y . 7 > AVA © a . 4 - ~ & a : n4 gainst the said defendant for the abandonment of th s therefore ordered, that notice of this action be ieex LOr six weeks in the Landmar ,a News paper ; 4acTvlOn, the purpose of the same . a requiring tne defendant to pe- } n + \ hay : rc +4 3, ntmn ('- a ioe die 1) (? : $y + “ ar at tne next err of the Suverior Court of iredelil County,to be ~- Dp OO,at the court—house in said 7 Y “~. neld on the Monday Yk * county ,and /answer or demur to tae complaint of the plaintif mt ° ry the’ releif thenein demanded Will be or i ~ y anc si 5 ¥ILCS i 2Uta 2L90C et s . ia : "T H ‘Kd ‘SA BNIOIIZ ‘AIG Dry, Ziletta vs. Dry, H. L. 1901 “1H ‘Ald ‘SA BNOTIZ ‘AIC 1061 Y ) p Gud Z4<2_ Uf kL Cy YL 0g € ck | oa Ol. . ¢ b iG \ Ee ei he fh Ca oe, f rhe g ide Fels hon noe HA "7 ‘H ‘kiq "SA BOIIZ ‘AI 1061 ( Ae cath HK fh 00, be 4 ZE<R_ 2 fp l og K ck btor< ote a] “¥ / y ae Ene ia <c a we wah tis os 4S enh eso henge ent a es acim och FETA hele, ye 1 Mle, ie Peun Cteiog athe 2 A Tubman QMRATLD AL) kk cha? clas N fired itenanys |= 8g Meperte m7 \ =S c re TN oa Zé gait < fr Centon 2 a R 9 a } : ! | "TH ‘Aig "SA BYOIIZ ‘AIG 1061 Pier temas: u \ i Dry, Ziletta vs. Dry, H. L. 1901 In the Superior Court. November Term 1900. Tae pheintiff above named complaining Oc% 870 oO S N e - > < yw "SA BYOTNZ ‘AIG 4 ety > “7 ‘H ‘Aq "SA BYOITZ ‘AIG fl cs tt: Zilletta.Dry. vs. Issues. . H. tL. Dry. I. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the complaint? Answer e 2. Is the plaintiff a resident of the state of Nerth Carolina as alleged? Answer ° 3. Did the defendant abandon the plaintiff and live separate and apart from her as alleged? Answer . 7 H ‘Ad ‘SA BNONIZ ‘AIG 1061 No. 6.—-BILL OF COSTS.—CIVIL.—Printed and for sale by Edwards & Broughton, Printers and Binders, Raleigh, N. C. Docket _.. SUPERIOR COURT. County. | Order for enlarging time of pleading. ..... chindacinaaes i ing all names therein ... 47-07. > 7 Judgment Against Original Summons, or other ki Clerk to Judge Appeal fr: Interlocutory Orders............ : | Subpoena, each name. Referee’s Allowance Sheriff A ee Constable Magistrate Plaintiff ’s Witnesses Defendant's Witnesses i Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian ............... / continuance... eteciacns Suede cote Gees 30 Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing.......00........... 1 00 Issuing Commission 0000000... 0. a 75 Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate............ 25 Seal............ sdigetd ; ; fring [ 25 s Motion, Entry and Record of. A Cy eee 25 Notice, .......... ; J : : 25 Notice, for each name over one in same paper 10 Impaneling Jury...... 10 Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided, 50 Judgment final in term time... : I 00 Judgment final betore Clerk... coceee 50 Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support 50 Docketing same 25 Docketing ex parte Proceedings 5° Judgment 25 Summons 25 Indexing Judgment 10 Filing Papers 10 Postage, actual Transcript of Judgment 25 Execution and Sheriff’s Return 5° Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and fea Coan. 7 ranscript to Supreme Court, copy sheets, each 10 County Tax, when Jury impaneled 3 90 1.20. As. Wy /0 Se er ee Se ee ee nt cingethaknieeniemeraneal qSUlBsY (apog ay7 4q pexg sy) ; *MAIID===SLSOI AO Tid WZAIOT TIAII ‘ON j caccneetnganRRC Dry, Ziletta vs. Dry, H. L. 1901