Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Divorce Records 1855-1913 Benfield-Byers
O16! Are, ‘ployuag ‘SA “VY 90f “pjoljueg SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed by Crowson Bros., Printers, Statesville, N. C. a rile __County.--In the Superior Court. “ slow 2 Bin Jue e AGAINST ~( SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. { State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff. SPrrhett — Coanty GREETING: You are Hereby Commanded to summon—— “ piensa Nae. tied ache SO isa eh the defendant._above named, itil be found within your a to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of___..-7_ 7 “<*4*“<*-_____. at the Court House in ey sf Ss. atlreey<IJQ on Pee an NR ieee Ge a t , a e | the same being the ea a. vii MOE ic te oa, ita 194, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superion Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant__take notice if. "7 fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff_. will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this oF day of. Met Le Se a 197 (“77 JMOL LEE LA Clerk of Superior ul .County. TO Gee T Mecte” AGAINST “quepuezeq oy} quepueseq oy} se 4s00 Yyure| oy} jt ‘xeAemoy SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. SI} ‘s[ves pus spuvy INO sseUqTM SI} SUL B1OJaq peqliosqns pue 0} UIOMG JO UINS 8Y} UI ‘UOKOR sIyy UI~-~ { “Ayunog --~--- ojUN puNog seajesino eSpe,Mouyoe 9M, LSNIVDV ‘VNITOUVD HLYON AO ALVIS YPHUIL[ J 943 Jo A9ao0001 Avw Ta uates: e Aep- ae ‘yanoD AoLIedng ey} uy ‘suorjynoexe Wor ydwiexe Ajr1edoid puv sarzI{IqGeI] ‘s}qep sIy eAoqe pue 10A0 “U0I}0B SIY} UI- “quepueyeq oy} Avd jyeys ~---------- Plaintiff’s Attorney. SIB[[OP pezpuny OM} Jo WINS OY} YII0M SI oy Shes UIOMS BuIeg ~~--~---------- ‘pIoA oq 0} —_—— yons |[e-~~ arian Benfield, Joe A. vs. Benfield, Mary 1910 O16! Are ‘playuag ‘SA “Y 90f ‘pjolfuog 2 ot cont er eae nieagearaitangerimegmance ne Arata ne one inant Re i North Carolina y In the Superior Court Iredell County I January 51910. Joe A. Benfield q | ‘ vs 1 AFFIDAVIT. ' Mary Benfield I : ; Joe A. Benfield, being duly sworn and says; that in the above entitled action, now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County, the Sheriff of said County has returned the Summons issued to him in said action endorsed " Mary Benfield is not to be found in Iredell Comty"; that the defendant therein cannot after due diligence be found within the State; that said defendmt is a preper party to said ection, being an action brought for an absolute divorce; Wherefore, the plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of the Summons be made on and for de- fendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina. This the _.I=.. ee Januar yf 9i9 A or a Pargptiant/ Ltn ues SJ OX Sy a5: (uicKe ttA¢e a 7 s tet bop ey Coz» Benfield, Joe A. vs. Benfield, Mary 1910 Are ‘pjeyuag ‘SA "V 20f ‘pjayuag O16! North carolina I In the Superior Court Iredell county © | I Januery ,1910. Joe A. Benficld I vs X ORDER, Mary Benfield It appearing from the affidavit of Joe. A. Benfield, that Mary Benfield, the defendant therein,is not to be found in Iredell County, and cannot after due diligence be found in the State, and it further appearing that this is an action instituted for. the purpose of obtaining a divorce absolute; It is, therefore, ordered that notice of the action be published once a week for six weeks in the Landmark » @ newspaper published in Iredell County, settine forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same and requiring the defendant to appear, at the May Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County to be held on the 23rd day of May ,1910, at the Court House in said County, and answer or demur to the complaint-- of the plaintiff, or the relief demanded will be granted. This the f.Qx- day of sanufep, 1910 / Cle rk of the Court. ~ 7 Ue stoned hea nepal emma ree ea na Sen sear aot naman pte \ Benfield, Joe A. vs. Benfield, Mary 1910 Sotesvil, NV 6. pee. - C Are, ‘ployueg SA "VY 30f ‘playusg O16! M+ eo Narhoins Cee. 1E LANDMARK =. q R. R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR. D TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY.. ok —y t_ Sy Are ‘playuag ‘SA “VY 90f ‘plaquag O16! R. R. CLARK, PROPRIETOR. Db TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDAY. ; — al P Ukeen rs Usher | doo se mB dt Sil att ead: ee i Sis I de Na Nl Sh ih ll Ol6I Are ‘pjoyuag "SA “VY 90f ‘Pleyucg os Q In the Superior Court May Term,1910, 7 Worth Carolina Iredell County 0 Jée A. Benfield, Plaintiff. -Vvse- Mary Benfield, Defendant. That the plaintiff complains and says: --First-- That he a citizen and resident of Iredell County and State of North Carolina, and has been for several years. --Second-- That he and the defendant intermarried in the year 1905, and have one child, now in the possession of the plaintiff. - --Third-- That on or Tk November ,1909, eS] yo left the home of the plaintiff ce one Jasper Hyder, and as he is informed and heels poueh Lhe J ee iy with the avs Jasper Hyder, » bree --Fourth-- That he has been a resident and citizem of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceeding the commencement of this action, and the facts set forth herein have been known to him for more than six months prior to the filing of this Complaint. Wherefore, the plaintiff demands judgment that the Bonds of matrimony existing between himself and defendant be dissolved; that he have the custody of the child now in his possession, and for as may be just and right. such other and further relief, Attorney for i" nti Ol6! Are, ‘playuog SA “VY 20f ‘prayuag North Carolina * Iredell County Joe A. Renfield,being duly sworn says, that the foregoing Complaint is true of his own knowledge, except as to matters and things stated therein upon information and _ and as to those he believes it to be true. Titan, Sworn to and subscribed before me this the cae day of July,1910. Arey ‘pjeyuag ‘SA “VW 90f ‘playusg North Carolina In the Superior Court Ol6l Iredell County May Term,1910. Joe A. Renfield, Plaintiff. 4 -vs- (AFFIDAVIT, Mary Benfield, Defendant. Q Joe A. Benfield, being duly sworn alleges, that the facts set forth in the Complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; that said complaint has not been made out of levity or collusion between himself and his wife, and not for the mere purpose of being free and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the Complaint; that the facts set forth in said Complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to his knowledge for six months prior to the filing of the Com- plaint; that he has been a resident of the State for more than two years next proceeding the filing of the,Co Sworn to and subscribed beof me this the on-=te= day of Ju O16! Are ‘playuag SA “VY 20f ‘plaluag North Carolina In the Superior Court id Iredell County t August Term,1910. Joe Benfield vs ¢ ISSUES. Mary’ Benfield ] --First-- Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in the Complaint? Answer :- ime --Second-- Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Caro- lina for two years next prior to the commencement of this suit? snever:- Yoo --Third-- SR Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the Complaint? Answer: - » Benfield, Joe A. vs. Benfield, Mary 1910 RSMeans By In the Superior Court Are ‘Pleyueg ‘SA “VY 90f ‘pazuag North Carolina Iredell County August Term,1910. O16! ‘Joe. Benfield, ' ss JUDGMENT ves Mary Benfield s Rhis oause\agatng on to be heard at this term of the Court before His Honor Joseph S. Adams, Judge and a Jury,. and the jury having found the issues submitted in favor of the plaintiff: It is,therefore , considered and adjudged by the Court that the Bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved; that the plaintiff have the care and custody of their child, and he be freed from any ‘liability by reason of his marriage ae H x 4 2 } “ dge Presiding. } E Be E i t t Benfield, Joe A. vs. Benfield, Mary 1910 ‘DN ‘A1tasepepg- sane yy eUgZp “Dk Vr Tada as “a . Benfield, Joe A. vs. Benfield, Mary 1910 Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N.C, a eh he ch een : STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF oc ee County--GREETING: Wou are hereb Commanded to Summon jd Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein Defendent Witness -; Clerk of our said Court, at office in Monday after the. Monday in we o =) ge " = < ag we a J * & oO Z16l — Ww oa oO oS » go os Oo ao -_ a =; + — — @ oF cl6l AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. | {i i} : 3 [} . the defendant....above named, if Pe. be found within View to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of at the Court House in Sake amy .on ‘the // Monday “after the [PP wins of A the same being the Ze day of Moy 19 Cdgnd answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County,within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if the they fail to answer to the said complaint Withip, that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 47 day of ” 19.4 deem ; , C2. LP ‘ ~<L ti 24 Clerk of Supeyi tACourt i L. a. Kol wnt ‘SA TILA ‘28U9q qd ‘aducg 161 uc yo y3N0D ropsedng 243 50 ~- 7 61 a . wey, 03 aiquamnyey ‘31730 40) SNOWWAS © SI) aur a10jaq poquosqns pue OF TIOMS “snoyynoexa wor ydurexe Ayzadoid pure sarqyiqety ‘s3q@P Sq 24092 pug 12A0 sI¥[jop peypung om3 Jo TINS Of} qyom st aq shes TIOMS u1eq” jo Avp” “siq) ‘sjeas pue spuey INO SSON}M ‘nonoe sq) ay BHA OD yo s2A0001 Avia yuepaayed aq} SB 3S09 ‘pron aq 03 ‘saeyjoq: jaepaayed 24) *Ayanoy 4ynod sopedng 243 BI \ ‘¥YNITIONYO HLNON JO GLYLS SA [LAN ‘93U9q auAW ‘93u0q Tl6l & PE SE, pee eepamare oan mane , ee ee a : ' | i T } Benge, Will vs. Benge, Myrtle 1912 Benge, Will vs. Benge, Myrtle 1912 a ) mw a ee Wha. dite. Aion He, Miniee, Cac, Ong , Covet Oe farry 5 ack } f 3 \ f} ; i f 5 a Se gece te LILO Benge, Will vs. Benge, Myrtle 1912 Summons For Relief—Clerk—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C. IREDELL 3 County. ~~-In the Superior Court. BOB BENSON SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of ___ #BRS_ ROWAN County—GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to summon_._CLARA BENSOW 66 PP OF Es eS < Y [Z6l County, within faiPto answer to the said complaint at that time, the plaintiff....will apply for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. 9, Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this County. AGAINST CLARA BENSON SUMMONS FOR RELIEF Returnable within ‘stttse days into the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court edell County. Received Served < J 33 eS neal 191_Z7._ A AMtg. A, Plaintiff’s Attorney. Fea B/C Benson, Bob vs. Benson, Clara 1921 mw ® oO BB o PP ay Bo < “ [76 Nerth Carelina, { In the Superier Court, Iredell Ceunty. { Bafere the Clerk, Beb Bensen Vs. COMPLAINS, Clara Bensen The plaintiff, Bab Bensen, cemplaining ef the defendant, Clara “ensen, for cuuse ef actien, alieges and says# ~First~ Tpat en er abeut the 17th, day ef Nevember,1910, in Catawha ana defendant Ceunty, Stete ef North Carolina, the plaintiff interrarried and and lived tegether ag man and wife untill the defendant abandened the plaintiff en the25th.aay ef February — ,1915 , and they are new man and wife. “Sec end- Tpat.semetine prier te the 25thday ef February ,1915 as abeve set ferth, the defendant, witheut and cause en the part ef the plaintiff, began te abumecthe plaintiff by abandening his heme, until en the <StWay ef February _ ,igalS , tetally disregarding the selemnity ef the marriage vews, the defendant entirely abandoned the plaintiff and teek up with am cermitea adultry with en Wiis Davis and ethers unknewn te plaintiff;that shertly thereafter she teek up with and cemmited adultry with ene Sheiiy Smyre —_—, and later oe attempted te marry the said Shelly Smyre = = with whem she is new living in the Ceunty ef Rewan, Stuie ef Nerth Carwlina, as man and wife, “Third-tnat t That the plaintiff has net received the defendant in cen jugal erbraces since his knewledge ef her cenduct and since she «band ened him as set eut abbve. ~Feurth~ That the plaintiff has been « beni Gide resident ef the State ef North -grelina fer mere than twe years next preceeding the cem- mencement ef this actien, ww i. 66 PP OF i mo < “ [C6 “Fifth- That the facts set ferth ana contained herein have existed te the knewledge of the plaintiff fer mere than six menths next pre- ceeding the commencment ef this actien, WHEREFORE, the plaintirr dewrands judgerent that he be granted an abselute diverse fren the bends ef matrimony with the defendant, A : ‘ ; ' PA y ‘ iy Atterneys fer Pyaintiff. Bob Benson, being duly swern says: That the facts set ferth in the feregeing eer plaint are true te the best of his knewledge and be lief, and that the said cermplaint is net made out ef levity er by cellusien between ninselt and the defendant,und net fer the mere purpese ef being freed «and deperated from each ether, but in sincerity and in truth fer the causes mentiened in the cemplaint;that the facts set ferth in said complaint «as greunds fer diveree have existed te «ffiants knewled ge ef this actien fer mere than six menths prier te the cermencement er the filing ef this complaint, und that the Plaintiff has beena beni fide resident ef the State ef Nerth C,relina fer rere than twe years prier te the commencement ef this actien er the filing ef this ecemplaint, “worn te and subscribed before me, this the 23rd, day ef ‘Repterber,1919, Ment, Gabce. 1nee Core toiny — bx EK Safenin, Cots Lr LAL Cane | Se ee Un, Chrn Puan | | Le. hecranh apt Fs Cine 99 Bae Boargt mag | hag Km Lo kf CG Mm TMs F Graton, oe. , ab BK BIe[D ‘uosusg qoq ‘wosusg 1761 Benson, Bob vs. Benson, Clara 1921 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 3-15- 13-1M. Iredell County--In the Superior Court. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. vagal ae State of North Carolina, 70 the Shattel . Jredeji® County—GREETING: ou are hereby Commanded to summon Lidis. Black the defendant ...above famed, if... She. be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of....... Lredell at the Court House in on the Monday after the Monday of the same being the 14th day of Ockober 1918, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice ifshe ...they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. Oth day of October Clerk of Superior Court Tredeli County. BIpry] Ped ‘SA UNOS “YOR 616! *‘so0ue? terO°N FO 04 LTD pus [ores snp zeqzy qc ~~ O- Tle pedy--UE~punoz-—-0G--54 ~YFOS Buyprapoay que puerep ~ $08 STOTT Hove ayer “LSqZoOpoo 0} 2[QeUINjJoy LISNIVOV ‘A3ITIA YOI SNOWWAS TOE Tage TreapTEg ‘Aau10}7y Synarerg qou st, “‘AUNOD” FES STI ino; Jouadng 24} jo “161 ae jo Aep S14} SUT a40J9q paquiosqns pure 0} TIOMS ‘SHONNIEXS Woly Ydutaxa Aj1adoid pu SPHIIGel] ‘s}qap sty aaoge pur sas0 S7e[[OP pespuny OM} jo urns 94} 4yII0M st aq sks HIOMS Suteq (jeg) (18g) (jeg) 161 ‘q‘y jo Aep Sty} ‘sjeas pune Spuey Ino ssaujziy ‘uote Sty} ur Hue eq) JO 19A0991 Avur yep Id 9l[} SB jsoD yons |e JUBpurjeq ay} Aed [eys BHU _ 243 jt “aaamoy ‘PIOA 2q 03 ‘sie[joq ~ J0 Uns 94) UF ‘aojDe Stq} ur JUePUsjeq ay} 010N punog saajasino 23pa|mouyoe 34 LSNIVOV (Ajunop ‘¥NITONVYO HLNON dO FUL¥LS ‘NOD s0ladng ay) uy] BIpl'] YOR "SA UYOr “YOR 6l6l he North Carolina superior Court fredell County October Term 1918 John Black, plnintirr, Vs Complaint. Lidia Black, defendant. The plaintirr complains nd Says; First. That he and the defendant married many years ago and lived together as man and wife. until about eleven years &g0 when the defendant without any cause whatsoever Separates #-om the plain tiff 16ft for parts unknown and has not since lived with plain- tiff. wecond . That since the separation aforesaid, the defendant his absented hersel not only from the home and protection of the plaintiff but has left the County and State, and plaintiff? has never =e & word from her in writing or otherwise: nor has any friend or kindred of either himsel \: f of his wife had any information ag to her whereabouts’ that Plaintiff has diligently sought her but to no avail. Third. ; has been a citizen and reftident of the County ‘ TA » } Yt Ttw 7 4 4 . go «(«Y state of North Carolina all his life; has had + 2 ~N6 IT cts herein for ma y yeors. refore he prays that the bonds of matrim ny existing between himself and the defendant be dissolvedland for such other and further releif ag may just and right. Bip] Ped ‘SA UyOr “YOR 616! Bip] PUI ‘SA UYOr “YORIG 6l6l ® In the above entitled case, John Black, plaintiff being duly sworn ssys, thet the f cts set forth in thé his foregoing Comp plaint are true to the best»of affiants knowledge and belbif and that the saud Complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between plaintiff and defendant and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other but in sincerity 2nd truth for the causes set forth in the Complaint thst the facts set for‘h for the grounds of divorce h ve existed to his knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of the Complaint .nd that plaintiff h»s been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two ywars next preceed ing the filing of the Compia int. sworn to and subscribed bef ore me this the 30th day of August 1918. GR \ Dbpoi . UY - eIpr] Yu SA UYor “YeIg 6161 North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County October Term 1918 John Bleck, plaintiff. { Vs ! Affidavit. { Lidia Black, defendunt. John Black, platntiff being duly sworn says. That he has 1 good and meritorious cause of action againt the defendint, that of,Divorce, that his wife, the defendant, has - been absent from him for more than ten years, that he has had no gom uniaction with her and verily beleives she is dead. that she cannot after due search and diligence be found in tthe County of Iredell and State of North Carolina, as evidenced by the Return of the Sheriff of Irefiell County on the Summons is-ued by *he Court, " defendant not to be found in Iredell County and State of North Carolina, after due search and dili- Senunsy dherefore your petitioner prays that service be made upon the defendint by publication, as she is a necessary party. to this action. poles lb20/% Svrorn to and subscribed before me this the 3oth day of \ugust 191 /) 4 Black, John vs. Black Lidia 1919 North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County October Term 1918 John Black, plaintif?. Order of Public: tion. J Vs { ' Lidia Black, defendant. | Upon the affidavit of John Black that Lidia Black is a necessary p-rty to the above entitled action: that she cannot » after due search and diligence be found in the County of Ire’ell and State of North Carolina: that the plaintiff has a good cause of action agsinst the defendant and that the return of the Sheriff shows that the defendant cnnnot be found found: It is therefore ordcreé by the Court, that service of the Summons in the cause be made by publication as requirec by law in like cases. LUMA ee hes Ac Clerk Superior Court o 5 6 ~ oo ag 5 5 < ¥ 6l6l Black, John vs. Black Lidia 1919 IPI] Ye ‘SA uyor “YdeIg 6l6l —L___ Se eat : LEGAL NOTICES SERVICE OF SUMMONS By PUBLICATION North Carolina). - Superior Court Tredell Coun i r. Term 1918 John Black, Pi tiff, Upon the affidavit of the plaintiff that the defendant, Lidia Black, is a necessary party to -the above entitled cause; that shé is a non-resident of the State of North Carolina; that she due be found within. { e State and this action having been brought to dissolve the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and defendant: The defendant will take notice that an action, entitled as above, has been instituted in. the Superior Court of defendant, when and where the de- fendant is notified and required to ap pear and answer or demur to the com- plaint in the cause, or the relief y- for will be granted. J. A, HARTNESS, Clerk of Superior Court. August 30th, 1918. 5t9-30 ea [ESVIELE SENTINEL Leading Semi-Weekly lad in The Sentinel is an investment— Not a speculation.) te USED AND DATE | 12 {13 14 |15 16 |17 [18 {19 20 24 LD ia 24 | 25 | 4 creeds le Aisin a tes = 11 am 011 Uf, Black WS Are Black unt With a “ATES E SENTINEL CO, Inc. Leading Semi-Weekly SHED MONDAYS AND THURSDAYS Established 1892 in The Sentinel is an investment— Not a speculation.) }E USED AND DATE Total Iq) AMOUNT i 13 {14 |15 16 20 |21 |22 | 23 | 24 | oo S & QO 0 ar eS = = 5 a v 6l6l eIpry Yul ‘SA UYor “YORI 6l6l | HL iz “BAL ove : Dery se ; PnP ee fo | eso . pth een + ‘ r, Pen Tes ’ ee = Se aoeafieny ait a eal. Statesville, N. C., ork of Cowt, Iredell Cowmty:- John Black vs Lydia Black, Divorce Account With THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL CO, Ine. Semi-Weekly PUBLISHED MONDAYS AND THURSDAYS Circulates Among the Best People Established 1892 Of Iredell And Adjoining Counties oe (An ad in The Sentinel is an investment—Not a speculation.) AMOUNT OF SPACE USED AND DATE Total In : + 2 a Reagan es Scala itil eshte aac 4 5 8 | 9/| 10) 11; 12) 13) 14) 15] 16] 17 2 | 29] 30 Div oxce| Progeddi Ton: Seca ——= | REMARKS . 3 Ww Ww SS QO oO ~ b. 5 ; WF 5 5 < " 616! / Civil Subpoena,—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-'07-2M. STATE OF. NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF : bee : Cguity--GREETING: ee YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED 10's oe ss 2 f er Court; at thénext Court to be held for our said county at Defendant NU Eg haste icine Mc Rinse till cti iccinsengick Shed hob bintatagl , Clerk of our said Court, at office ¢ Monday after the... cesn.. Monday ay 27/9/49 a Hf My i tryord 1 lw lb, Oo wr’ B 7 I & me & & Oo 0 BS Qa. 5 5 < og 6l6l BIpry] Yea ‘SA uyOr “WORT 616! we > & QO © - nS & = = So 3 < w 6l6l North Carolina Iredell County John Black, plaintiff Vea Lidia Blaek, defendant This caus eoning on to be heard at thie term of the Court before Hie Honor, Marding, Judge ané a dury and being hearé and upon the whole reeord in the saune the Jury having found the iseues in favor of the plaintiff; Tt is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plai-tiz? ané the dofendant be and the same are hereby @iseolved and the plaintiz? declared free ané discharee’ from any and all liability because of the marriage in gaid cause. Whar, f Jehn Black, pltfr Ve Lidia Blaek, deft —— Black, John vs. Black Lidia 1919 BIpry Ped ‘SA UYOr “YOR G 616l Bill Sree rece and for sale id Brady Printing Co., Season i) N. C. No. Docket IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. __County. Judgment Against i} } Original Summons, or ot names therein . Appeal from Clerk‘to Judge. . . . Ojder for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders. Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond and Justification. . . . Order of Arrest Subpoena, each name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian... . Continuance . Caveat ” a will, —, and docketing. * Issuing \Cadbeatinion. | Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate SS iS Motion, Entry and Record of . Notice, for each namie over one in same paper . . Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time.. Judgment final before Glerk.. bide Judgment in favor of Widow's Year's Support. . . . Docketigg Same. . . a ; Do ng @x parte Proceedengs . . r { Judgement “ Summons . . Indexing Judgment.. Filing Papers. . Postage, actual . Transcript of Judgement. ... . Execution gOwherriff’s Return . Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal Transcript to Supreme Court . . . copy sheets, each County Tax, when jury impaneled . Sheriff . OF woebhak. Constable Magistrate . “at Lilie te daly tlh from. Maitix: bevy. Defendant's Witnesses eee. CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS-CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) Black; John’vs... Black Lidia 4919 we b fp = a x ® © oS f nm A oe. tl Qn ie ~ @ 5 T16l oy" hone ter 111 olen lb a sake haw Gisnbigess it fahee thw Oy I 07 Meg ele fn tap ln dal Ybat . Gils. av0tbe~ Corl att, fo “4 ope. abheveux~«~ ad ee ww pede of Faour “s i ES 2tre A leleee no a pote, Dy 2 Lecnon Cope t GEL wh fab sn (4% ee cae’ hta\pth 25%, pote 2 (3 thr JAM a Mate 2x” t hole bw Aethe On” vhp ti via et * fee (Y)S he ‘” q ‘O ‘diysuoyuel” ‘sa QoudI0},{ ‘diysusyue] eq —— a 7161 , J / F cr? At 's 6.2 e/ tte" r lee 0 dt Lewes Z than bn. eet Com —- Alias Riles aretha bat at. he | pa x | | “ayute oe A«~cttoc Lan ae a Ase the is | (4 CackX 23S fant Pa Aoce — é i hakntk 25 5 fielen the Iam Canin ae eacd 2% fe Bor oe ee, elie 7 KIX Mea oa A) AB Wa nther ; Shs Ante Jepkdo, ETF, terececctinallcy | Bi ew AMED stati ypefe tw ee Ope tate | AL, a4 oO; 2 ae LL Ne," fa wf 7 tA” floc a hae 9 shingle ne a La glore a t.— 9 Cw B, Rene te : Lasdae fers fil biorwe Pan ke fu DyromacB ag areal the ifn de, | | (aaace free he Gncerk % aAllgszu- anol Qe ecere « a ie Gra te 141 a Affe. oS a Arvasosiobley 4 : A p< elo Ker Se. gan EF ce” ‘dezel D f % 4 Sf MH MM « «ttf S Ty LL” Pros “ in, A) 2. ‘ / f- Lttoo” « PD SG ? « ~ a ‘q ‘© ‘diysusyueld ‘Sa QoUdI0] 4 ‘diysusyue] _ T16l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C .County.-- In the Superior Court. ahi - \ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant on named oer IR ne great Coynty, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, seer aber tie Eom oy at the Court Féuse in Tne Lela tla $jen. Sand answer the compl aint, a copy of he MEH ‘Cagatef which_yill be ed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court’ for ‘said County; within terete tale 2 2g KMegnynere , ; aud let said Defendant!) Within that,time, the-plaintiff.s.. thesttme-beingihe—. itake notice if. A-@4leey fail to answer to the said comrphaint ..wil apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. yl be Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this... 2.2 fay of we : bh nther 19.424. eZ... ) es Os oe Clerk of Saberior Court... ACL 42 County. ‘gO ‘diysusqueld ‘sa QoudI0],{ ‘drysusyue] q T16l 131738 80d SNOWNAS SIq} 2M s1Ojaq pequiosqns pur 07 ae “‘SUOTINIIRR w0Iy }dutaxs Ajyradoid pur sarqtIqet] ‘siqep myaoe pue 3240 SI¥I[OP perpuny OM} JO MINS dq} WWOM st aq sh a sseenenesemnenegflnennesesn / ~JUBpUayed 243 s¥ 3900 marry rene BHUJ 94} jt ‘eAaMmoYy ‘Ayano; ‘ynog sopedng 94} uy \ “¥NITIONVYOD HLYON FQ dL¥LS os ‘gO ‘diysusqueld ‘sa qouasol 4 “drysusque| a T16l Che L&zk ; hat aA Cacew eee <M tn prover Dag GS noon | ; Ax OA Par : | . aud Aaw factod : A Pleat tet Bal, - Aecllecee a2cor olin, A he: La arr Cac Acleae cer tfe 5 CoA yon 2B dp eck efrude BD | Sek eeltsttle put 2. abaur js atitg ae SEMIR Ta -b-fp, hrrodt2 (Buu Oca 79 hb hi a ee ey a Bho Alaetom wheel te fol Gf Hm O-ed 7 ee Dal the Atlhrigl eee te ee at A ‘ precy Ce feccdat cu Se 7 gee L Atar Ps 4 . | CVL0r offre che Qe. SL If25 tLakh A «cA i re 4322+ MM fe ae les, paced is oe of ee a ame Gen 22+ >t 2 be: Bag sc Qo | oF : ox» Rs Pica a ; 2 at “4A? oc Pr G, fret ka Cea Bea) cx Boes-~e a2 Ree? Ce Z Ser CCe sie Sf an (hk ae Croc , ‘Jr€ Max = HK ISS GF S/ 3 lek heer pet Y Bevo hr ger thee Sf Vefik gO ‘diysusqueld ‘SA QoUdIO],{ ‘diysusxue] eq Tl6l w Be. ® © 2G eB. ee 3 Qa oy @ 3 S ° o < ¥ Z16l neetetet fine ‘eta inet —rewmsanienins 26 paeeek on eet wie Way, ~aleinnans re Bye Blankenship, Florence vs. Blankenship, Q. B. 1912 ‘aD ‘diysusqueiel usio]{ “diysus query gy Tél “SA 90 du Suabetl Crush aoe aaa ne Poe a / +0. Ke Kevienl aud Tal iin | j Vv A727 he a pact clint of His Uns tae ez Ln ) ne A s Ke LL io Nica dled a aunik ferme Av (Det AAA Ee Aw as Fite sith V fegoe The pucprttl bf tad ron Aeny hud | ons ’ 4 f 7 y sie” A <x | Rehan de Ke hal nuk firernat (flim ol hike. dunt. thar he nik fa / fais Stole Ae. ee Bs, Cte ZF | ! e) ty Az (Lee PaO te pe casera Bega: ee ER RI RE IER oe 7 Blankenship, Florence vs. Blankenship, Q. B. 1912 Sd in aa me mrsinleccneiaeseninnn rete Serre ene te ERT ‘i Oe Se tae EM a MR eee ¥ North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County. october Term 1911. Florence Blankenship VS. SPECIAL APPERRANCE Q.-Blankenship. Defendant ,through his attorney H.P.Grier .enteres his special appearance in the above entitled action for the purpose of.moving to dismiss the same on the follow- ing grounds, First. That the defendant has not been served with summons or other process in said action ,»and the court has no juris- @iction . Wherefore defendant demands that no further pro- ceedings be had in said action and that same be dismissed at plaintiffs costs. Oye a a Te fr~ hv abo z ae. He Fig co SE Bi ened FZ ai tn £ > ‘q °O ‘diysuoqueld ‘SA QOUdIOL{ “diysusyuey gy Tl6l Blankenship, Florence vs. Blankenship, Q. B. 1912 Slaleswille, Si. CG Doar 7 194) --tIN ACCOUNT WITH... THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL Published Every Thursday Morning SUBSCRIPTION PRICE ONE DOLLAR PER YEAR IN ADVANCE Circulates Among the Best People of This and Adjoining Counties Advertising Rates are Reasonable. It Will Bring You Returns Tn} Jo ab ( Pgee Ten, | 921°? woe oo p 22 they Oo Oo — n aA SE. 35 KD ia i Be = o oO < ¥ Tl6l eee. Wy --tIN ACCOUNT WITH,,. THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL Published Every Thursday Morning SUBSCRIPTION PRICE ONE DOLLAR PER YEAR IN ADVANCE Circulates Among the Best People of This and Adjoining Counties Advertising Rates are Reasonable. It Will Bring Ye si > —— oe ; Tegae Perce a eee ww S £ = xe oOo oO = nm wn sw. 3D - ha) . ~ o on se r & | oO 7 “ T16l Slalesvll, H.C. :IN ACCOUNT WITH, THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL Published Every Thursday Morning. SUBSCRIPTION PRICE ONE DOLLAR PER YEAR IN ADVANCE Circulates Among the Best People of This and Adjoining Counties f& Advertising Rates are Reasonable. It Will Bring Yo North Carolina, | In Su Coit _sfeedelt- Count | Bares § |, : efen a 4 hat hes Potato 4. 1911, and answer or demur to ) * the fae or and com t . apply to. thew 2 ee i a y js bat 4 or the is Oct, 2, 1911. en ~~ oo e = 7 Re oO = v 4. 5 3 © w ey a S 2 a e oO = A w, a oc “Tt =~ 5 % oO = oO oO < of 16l u lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally —_ we) = e = ~ > oO = SF — Y con hu a _ ow a = 6 = —s oO = oo. — ~~ =r x 2 = oO = ° oO “ ft L6l & Salesvcle, XC if --:IN ACCOUNT WITH,,. THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL Published Every Thursday Morning SUBSCRIPTION PRICE ONE DOLLAR PER YEAR IN ADVANCE Circulates Among the Best People of This and Adjoining Counties Advertising Rates are Reasonable. It Will Bring Ye 7 1 Oe North Carolina, ! In Superior : [redell County, | Beles the J Jankenship |** | again te tie 7. B. "Blankenship | The de will tak the judge, to have a subsistence Secured to he the estate of her husband. said defendant will take notice ‘shat he is uired to fore the Ju therein. 7 Oct. 2, 1911. . A. HARTNESS, ©. S. C. WEA & Van Hoy AND J. B. ARMFIELD Attorneys, * lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Sialesuclh, No C ray, 7 AtrmnZuek -+:IN ACCOUNT WITH,,. THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL Published Every Thursday Morning SUBSCRIPTION PRICE ONE DOLLAR PER YEAR IN ADVANCE Circulates Among the Best People of This and Adjoining Counties fo f fo ae ( Jeg a Jie roe J Advertising Rates are Reasonable. It Will Bring Yo oa i’) o North Carolina, | In Superior Iredell County, | Before the J ; Blankenship | , f against, * [Notice ankenship |” —” ni - ve The defendant will tak endant above named | complaint in this eeding, or the laintiff wil]| = apply to the court for th ief| * demanded therein. cas a eh Oct. 2, 1911. {1ysudyur] q “SA QOUdIOF J “diysusyUuey ey <¢)-8 L6l c Please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Blankenship, Florence vs. Blankenship, Q. B. 1912 | Sibtle Cacd _— Za ra a | Wnt . Akaer _ : , | : : i Ast ol : Nbswig ae ae he clefencants | tt the Aféeaiad;, wt re af ue ! 7 | Beth fi oae aac ery ee Carr - 7 Kae ma 7 | fa ke Oolerrelers Ze nealion sgcen Athioe _, and fy the ee aR RN FON meee ae ae mr Blankenship, Florence vs. Blankenship, Q. B. 1912 e\ re ant Commission to Take Deposition.—Priuted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. NORTH CAROLINA, } In the Superior Court. hoes DELL ............ COUNTY. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To... pee . GREETING: \ We, reposing special trust and confidence in your integrity, do authorize and empower you to to appear before you at such time and place as you may appoint, and SAID... Q.B.BALANKENSHIP — to examine touching all such matters and things RS :.:. ‘ HE shall know of concerning a certain matter of controversy in our Superior Court for the County of IREDELL pending, wherein FLORENCE BLANKENSHIP plaintiff and Q.B.BLANKENSHIP defendant. And the deposition in writing, by you so taken, the same to transmit, sealed with your seal, to our Superior Court, to be held for said County, on the ‘30th day of 3 May- 1912.. 190 Witness Jas A.Hartness , Clerk of said Court, at office Iredell County Apeil 8th 1912. 199 a . i sy a ee YUU UIVCL2I Clerk Superior Court. we oe a nA es, Eee > QOD ws Pa 2 ° oO < 9 Z16l State of Montana, County of Cascade, Florence Blankenship DEPOSITION vs. Q. B. Blankenship. Pursuant to the annexed commission to me directed, I A. P, MeAnelly, under the authority thereof, on the 29th day of April, 1912, at ten o'clock A. M., in my office in the town of Belt, County of Cascade, State of Montana, the defendant being present, and the plaintiff not present, pro- ceeded to tnke the deposition of Q. B. Blankenship, who,first being duly sworn to speak the; truth between the said plain- tiff and defendant, deposes and says, in answer to inter- rogatories of H. P. Grier, for the defendant: Q. What is your name, age and place of residence? A. ©. RB. Blankenship, age 34 years, residence Belt, Montana. Where did you live before moving to the State of Montana? A. At Statesville, Iredell County, State of North Carolina. @. Do you know Florence Blankenship, the plaintiff, and 9 As wRat relation exists between vo Yes. She is my wife, How long did she live with you as your wife? About five months, State how you treated her after your marriage and or not you mistreated her in any way? I treated her with kindness and never mistreated her in manner whatever. State hownshe treated you, her conduct towards you and what threats, if any, she made against you? A. With extreme cruelty, She threatened to kill me or have some one else kill me, She made threats against my life and abused and slandered me and done everytning she could to make lifw miserable for me, Q. State fully why you left your home in North Carolina, ‘gO ‘diysusqueld ‘SA QoUdI0[,{ ‘diysusyue] _ t16l telling the jury all about it in your own way? A. She trumped yp false charges against me and had me ar- rested and imprisoned on two different occasions, subject- ing me to great humiliation and disgrace. @. Did you voluntarily separate yourself from your wife, and voluntarily live separate and apart from her and refuse to support her according to your means? Ae SS I was driven to leave her on account of her cruel and inhuman condust towards me as I was afraid she would kill me. Q. Did you own any real estate in North Caroline, about how many acres and its value? A. I own eighteen acres of land, which I value at One Thousand ($1000.00). Q, Had you built a dwelling on this real estate for your- self ‘and wife, and was it furnished as a home? -F Lhe. A. Yes. A good house and all furnished ina manner. Q. Who did you leave in possession of this real estate, dwelling and household and kitchen furniture? I left my wife in possession when I left. Q. If I have omitted to ask you any thing, or you desire to make-any further statement, you may do so now? I found that owing to her violent conduct and her ifr sane jealousy I was unsafe to longer live with her, and be- ing in fear of my life, owing to the thents which she had madeagainst re, I concluded that 4$t would be wisdom on my partto leave her and my home, in order to avoid a tradgedy. She was continually threatening that her relatives would murder me and she said that it was her intention to get away with me and get the land which I owned into her posses~ sion, ‘gO ‘diysusqueld ‘sa QoUdIO] 4 ‘diysusyue] gq Z161 The foregoing deposition was sworn to and subscribed before me at the time and place above mentioned. C Notary Public for the State of Morita. Residing at Belt, Montana. My commission expires Jan. 8, 1914; ww BE - o oO BB aE 35 On a Pa 2 © o < 2g Z16l XM ‘q O ‘diysusyuel a “SA QoudIO} J ‘diysusyue] gq 7161 ras 4 j i, North Carolina In The Superior Court Iredell County. To May Term 1912 Florence Blankenship { Q. 5B. Blenkenship ] Defendant by leave of court,reserving his righte under the special appearance entered in this case, answering the petition, says. Firet« That the allegations contained in the first par- agraph are admitted. Second. That the allegations conatined in the second paragraph are untrue and are denied. Third. ; That the facts alleged in the third paragr- aph are untrue and are denied. The thuth being that defendant's life has been spent largly as a hired man upon the farm,and as @ common laborer in other avocations. That by reason of the pers -eoutions of his wife and her threats to take his life he was forced to leave his home, abandon the savings of a lifetime , and seek safty and subsistance: beyond the reach of her ex- prese malice . Fourth. Defendant admite that he owns the lands menti- oned in the fourth paragraph ,but alleges that same are mort- gaged for a large part of their value . That thie mortgege which was original given to Kart Douglass ,yhas as defendant is advised been ,at the instance of plaintiff, been taken over,by one Ab. Johnson ,a near kineman of plaintiff ,with the intent and pur- pose of furthering the design of plaintiff in driving her husband ,this defendant,away from said premises and of securing the same to herself and her people against the rights of this defendant. ‘q °O ‘diysusqueld ‘sa QoUdIOL 4 ‘diysusyue] a T16l \ Fifth. Defendant admite that plaintiffs is a resident of the county of Iredell ,State of North Carolina as alleged ,all other allegations in said paragraph are untrue &nd are denied . Farther answering eaid petition defendant says: First. That soon after his marriage plaintiff evinced a violent and ungoverned temper and would fam without cause, fre- quently quarrell with and abuse defendant . That this dispo- sition inoreased in violence untill plaintiff began to threat- en to take the life of defendant ,and to charge Bim with vio- lations of law and to cause his imprisonment thereunder,so such so ,that on“4<~/—aay of March 1911., plaintiff ,without prob- Whe (3 Tt able cause ,procured a warrant to be issued against defendant charging him with fornication and adultery ,unpon which warrant he was arrested and gave bond for his appearance for trial. Second. That as soon as plaintiff learned that defendant had given bond ,and had not been put in jail upon said charge, her anger rose higher against defendant and she threatened to charge defendant with the detestable crime against nature,and on the /* day of Maroh 1911., and in furtherance of said th- Teat Gnd without probable cause,pleaintiff personally made af- fidavit charging defendant with said detestable crime and pro- cured a warrant against him upon which he was arrested and put la ey aetna een, . . . in jail untill his friend could arrange a bond in the sum of $750. 00 for his appearance to answer said charge. Third. That so violent wae plaintiff against her husband- this defendant,and so determined was she to drive him away from his home and to distroy his reputation and to encompass ~his Tuin ,that she and her friends diligently circulated the charges she had made against him, retained able counsel to prosecute the cases she had prefered against him ,and offered herself as a wit- ness to the alleged detestable crime against nature. ‘gO ‘diysusqueld ‘SA QoUdIOL,{ ‘drysusyue] ey 16l t at \ we 4 gin % . Fourth. That said charges so made against him without probable cause were duly investigated by the Superior. Court of Iredell County at germ 1911., when the bill charging this defendant with fornication and adultery wae returned in open court by the Grand Jury "not a true bill" and the other charge prefered agai- net defendant by plaintiff,to wit ; the crime against nature was investigated by the solicitor and special counsel for plaintiff and abandoned ,whereupon this defendant was discharged by the court. Fifth. Having been thus dealt with by his wife , humiliated disgraced and put in prison ,his life thereatened ,having expe- rianced the fury of her hatred and malice and fearing that she would atteuee bic life ,defendant was forced to leave his home in her possession ,and in a land of strangers, without money and without friends,commence anew the sguumukatteus battle of life. Wherefore having fully answered defendant demands judgment that plaintiff take nothing by her mtz& writ and that he recover his costs of action to be taxed by the clerk of this court and such other and further relief as may be “ and proper. bs Wy. // Z Attorney for pikak defendant. State of Montana Lk fy gl, , ys ! County of Cascade. Q.B.Blankenship after being duly sworn deposes and says that the fofegoing euswer id true of his own knowledge, except as to those matters and things therein stated on informa- tion and belief ,and as to those he believes it to be true. Swodmto and subscribed before me this the < a day f April’.1922. e 1) 2 t C4)a_ 7" Kt y mo N Notary Pubile for the Stete of Montene 7 Residing at Belt, Montana. My Commission expires Jan. 9, 1014 ‘q ° ‘diysuoqurla s101 4 ‘drysusquey a 16l "SA 90U c Attyot efdedotq tuodtiw mid temtsge ebem os eegtsdo bise stadt {fLebetl to t2u0d rolrequa edt yd betegiteevnt ylub etew eBLso ¢uabaeteb etd? gatztedo (Lid edt medw ,.f1@f wivot te ysauod edt yd truco meqo at bhemiutet sew yretiubs bas aoltsoltatot diiw -tegs betetetq eytedo tedto edd bas "Cfid eut? s ton" ytul bastd ecw erutea tentsge emtto eft ¢ tlw of Witalolq yd saabaeted Jac trisaiely Zot feemsoo £8 te a bas sod toltoe ods xe betagiseevnt weno, hae? Ww ene serio Ne ed? yd bests eth esw trebaeteb elit m0 ozedw, pSibbasds ba = 7. <¢Pau00 betsiitaud, etlw eid yd diiw ae seed satvei eq ct tuq bas beocaetpe lh eda tads gattast ‘as eotlsm ta ee ked to vast edt beonsiz emod efd eveel of beotolt sew g & setts Ldyow bas venom tyvodgiw ,etestetts eOtil to slitad aunt yremmoo ,ebasiz: svods ly Scnemabut ebaemeb ¢ashaeteb betewaae ve vad etotetedi tevooet of ted? has thew -auae-sed-yd priddod extst Tiizalely tact » _ bas 2200 eld? to Atelo edt yd bexat ed of moltos to stereo ald eteqoty has teut ed yem as isilet tedstwi base tedvo dove et — ee ee ajo 7 -taabasteb 2uZg tot yeatosszA atainol to etas& e@bacesd To ysauc _ oe) — 2 = on > oO = S — — — ~ K — aw = w —_ > =~ — ¥- oO = a —_ — S _ _ 2 = oO = ° o < Y 4 L6l c 'ASALE OF VALUABLE LANDS. = Floreace Blankenship vs. Q. B. Blankenship. ; DN & een omeaoce re ok Satowile, NO. / the best bidder for cash at the court house door t in Statesville on SATURDAY, JULY 20, 1912, - HELANDMARK > R. R CLARK, PROPRIETOR £ BHED TWICE-A-WEEK: TUESDAY AND FRIDA | we oS & — A Oo Oo S = nm so 35 iF | ° > Qo 3 oO oO < ¥ ‘a0 cl6l fru orders to « 4 ¥ i; wl@ pure Ph ; Wi Blankenship, Florence vs. Blankenship, Q. B. 1912 Vinega: eple - «u€ pure one ord a lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally Blankenship, Florence vs. Blankenship, Q. B. 1912 evle Vinegar made juice, — a — & oo = —] > oO — v —_ +5 Pe a i) — oe _ Ww sy = s 2 x oO = a — so “Tj ~ 2 4 o > ° o _ vi L6l lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally c TERMS OF S&LE OF THE Q.. padi, LANDS. "ALL CROPS RESERVED ?WITH THE RIGHT Ii? THE RECEIVER TO ENTER: AND REMOVE ‘SAPD CROPS AS THEY sneak Foeeeaton OF FACH CULTIVATED FIELD TOCRE GIVEN AS SOON AB CROP S CAN’ ‘BH GATHERED .2AND SUBIZOR TO THIF Rront ‘POsMirestdy. ‘70 | BE GIVEN PURCHASER. UPON.CONFIMATION OF THE SALE, AND PAY* UENT OF. tHe PUR SE -MONBT, *-:. sy = : has “a able i 2 re Ae a ible bid ‘Purghase money i. yable in ut ah} responsible - The sale will not be left open ,vut is subject to the approval of the vse ere ee, - Tredell Bupeeior Court yote. ts Sea ae 3 The’ Commissione?s will repart ‘the sale within the first two days of the July.term of Court-. ~~) The two, ¢ractg will be wold separatly ahd fhgn “f, a whole amd.the highest. bid will be the bid reported “the other Bid being disregarded. This July 2oth 1922. K/ Kone ¢ Wahi Commissioners. ‘gO ‘diysusyueld ‘SA QOUdIO] J ‘diysusyue] ey 7161 we > 2 2 rw o Oo — | myn s 2. 35 4) 7 ox 4 — oO oO < y T16l ww —_— > a re o oa 3 5 uy eS, Ee. re had oo ws Pa » o o - vi c16l Repeated Intentionally North caraeees In the Superior Court, Iredell County. ) July Term, 1912. Florence Blankenship) ~ -vs- IvVaGERAT » ) ) ) Q. Blankenship. This cause coming on to be heard and being heard by His Honor C. M. Cook Judee and it appearing from the report filed in this ease, that same has been compromised; amd it further appearing that, agreeable to said compromise, the lands mentioned and described in the pleadings have been . duly advertised and sold to J. E. Miller at the price of $765.00 for both tracts; and it further appearing that the rents for this year were reserved, and that the receiver was to have the right to enter and remove the crops from said lands as the same mature, giving possession to the purchaser of each field as soon as said crops mature and are gathered therefrom, and that subject to this right in the receiver, possession of said premises is to be siven the purchaser upon confirma- tion of the sale and the payment of the purchase moncy; and it appearing that the price offered for said lands is just and reasonable: . It is.therefore considered. and.adjudged that..said compromise between the parties and the sale thereunder be and the same is hereby in all respects confirmed and approved. It is further considered and adjudged that R. Tf. Weatherman and Harry P. Grier, be and they are hereby appointed Commissioners to execute and deliver to J. E. Miller a deed conveying to him the lands described in the complaint in fee simple free and disc! arzed from any and all claims of the parties to this proceeding, upon the payment to them of the ‘a °O ‘diysuoquela ‘SA QOUdIOL{ ‘diysusyUe] ey 16l u sh scl money in full according to the terms of sale. It. is further considered and adjudged that the said Receiver, his tenants and agents and the plaintiff Florence Blankenship vacate said premises and surrender the»... same to the purchaser subject to the right of said Receiver to enter and gather the crops therefrom as the same mature, It is fruther considered and adjudged that the rents due be turned over to the Receiver.as full compensa- tion for his trouble and expense. Ly. Coek~ Judge Presiding. ww tee Dp © rs e & o & Bo 5. 2. o>? Fo a? a “Wo S oO oO < Y Z16l North Carolina, ) Superior Court. ) Iredell County, ) August Term, 1912. Florence Blankenship ) ) NG. } REPORT — : OF COMPROMISE & SALE, Q. Blankenship. , oe << sag hvaiee The undersigned attorneys of record in the above entitled cause report to the court that on June 29th, 1912, & compromise was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant; plaintiff being represented by her attorneys Messrs. J. B. Armfield and R. T. Weatherman and the defendant by his attorney Harry P. Grier, by the terms of which the lands mentioned and described in the pleadings were to be advertised and sold by R. T. Weatherman and Harry P. Grier to the best advantage, and out of the moneys arising from said sale the costs of this action, including a commissioner's fee to the said “Weatherman and Grier, for advertising and making said sa@le, all taxes due on the land and the note of defendant secured by mortgage on said lands, should first be paid, and after paying the above items the plaintiff should be paid one-third of the balance in full of all claims she has against defendant. Agreeable to this compromise the lands Were adver- tised and offered for sale at public auction at court house door on saturday July 23rd, 1912; and it was publicly announced at said s 1at the sale of said land was subject to the approval of the Judee Presiding at the July Term, 1912 of Iredell Superior Court, And at said sale H. S. Douglass became the last and highest bidder therefor at the price of $740.00 for both tracts. And thereafter to-wit: ON July 27, 1912, J. E. Miller made an advanced bidof $765.00 for said land, on the terms announced at said auction, and the ‘gq °O ‘diysusyuel a ‘Sa QouaIOL 4 ‘diysusyue] ef T16l said H. S. Douglass was immediately notified by letter of said advanced bid and was requested to make a final advanced bid, if he desired to purchase said land, and he declined to make any advanced bid, and your Samawinliee have also endeavored ' to get an advanced bid from other pe TRON e See Pee Nee MK tween cal purchase of said land. As said bid of J. E. Miller is a full and fair price for the lands we ask that the court confirm the sale and appoint and empower some suitable person, or persons, to execute and deliver to the said J. E. Miller a good and sufficient deed conveying the lands described in the pleading in fee simple to said purchaser upon payment of the purchase money and every part thereof, This July 29th, 1912. / While Lith Apprpved. - ' ‘ ww 55 5 x oe @ 3S = = 2. 3 ae OF m3 “ oO ~ oO Oo < yy 7161 4 North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County T.W. Boatright,Pleintiff -V8s- OO. BP Uk PRs L.N. Boatright,Defendant. The plaintiff complains and says: --First-- That he and the defendant married about the year 1898 or 1899 and lived together until about 1903, when the défend- ant without any fault on the part of this plaintiff abandoned the plaintiff, and has not since said date lived with him. --Second-- That as he is informed and believes the defendant com- mitted Adultery with one A.J. Fry, and other parties to this Dw Oo 9° 2 8 5.3. go ge z Ss Zz < ¥ plaintiff unknown. [l6I ~-Third-- That he has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years next preceding the in- stitution of this suit, and that the facts contained here- in have existed to his knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this Complaint. WHEREFORE, the pleintiff demands judgment, that the bonds of matrimony existing between himself end the defendant be lissolved, and that he be declered free and discharged from any obligations to the defendant ,because of the rinatioa- ship existing between them. torney for e Plain . m T.W. Boartight, being duly sworn says, that the facts set forth in the foregoing Complaint are “true , to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that. said complaint is not made out of levity or colusion between himself and his wife, and not 4. > for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other ,but in sincerety and in truth for the causes men- tioned in the Complaint, and that the facts set forth have existed to his knowledge for six months prior to the filing of the Complaint, and that he has been a resident of the State of North Carolina, for two years next preceding the filing of the Complaint. On i CAP ota ty Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 8th day of May,1911. Lh, VV aebs fh Rp Dw oo gs 5. 5. 0a 08 = = ae A= a [161 ae SS 7 cmnaaimna | P Ts Bd Boatwright, T. W. vs. Boatwright, L. 191] ‘'N “7 ‘WYsuMmeog ‘SA “AL WYSuMyeOog — Oo ‘'N “7 WYsumieog ‘SAM LL WYSumjeog _ Oo NOTICE OF SUMMONS. .. otth't '}4n the Superior reget Con al "Gears T.W Clerk Superior This the 5th day of April, #911. do N “7 ‘Wysumieog SAA LL WYSumjeog 116] N “7 Wysumieog ‘SAAD WYSUMIROg L16] dl I NOTICE OF SUMMONS. _ ofth Carolina’} In the St oder Come | Caen T.W. Poa ant | | i L. M; Boatiight=def, ; The defendant’ atove nainell cate ae nced in the Superior rt of Hal f ai Court for the relie ae : n said sais This the sue day — Slalesville, XN Cc Os. yn / : / +-:IN ACCOUNT WITH,,. THE STATESVILLE SENTINEL Published Every Thursday Morning SUBSCRIPTION PRICE ONE DOLLAR PER YEAR IN ADVANCE’ Circulates Among the Best People of This and Adjoining Counties Bratt 3S ong Cer oe i Advertising Rates are Reasonable. It Will Bring You Returns — : 2 |o y & 5 = - 4 SA “AL IYBuMReOg [161 wo © 8 5. a = . 4 [161 ‘SA “ML TWYSuMmRog North Carolina : In the Superior Court Iredell County T.W. Boatright -ve- AFFIDAVIT. L.M. Boatright T .v. Boatright, being duly sworn says that in the above entitled action now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County, the original papers in said case having been lost or misplaced, and for the purpose of substitution of papers of the original papers, plaintiff says: That the Sheriff of Iredell County has returned the Summons issued to him in said action,endorsed L.M. Boatright is not to be found within Iredell County and that the defendant cannot after due diligence be found within the State of North Carolina . That the said defendant is a proper party to said action, which is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to an- null the Bonds of Matrimony existing between them. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of the Summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County,North Carolina. Sworn to and subscribed before me Vv this the dst day of April,1911. / Q. Arar, (p North Carolina Iredell County T.W. Boatright, Plaintiff ve ORDER OF PUBLICATION. L.M. Boatright, Defendant. It appearing from the affidavit of T.W. Boatright, that L.M. Boatright, the defendant therein is not to be found in Iredell County, and cannot after due diligence be found in the State, and it further appearing that this is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to dissolve the bonds of matrimony: It is ,therefore, ee notice &: Stata action be published once a week for six weeks in the Sentinel , & newspaper published in Iredell County, setting forth jthe title of the case, the purpose of the same, together with a brief fecitel of the subject mat-——— tar af +h. =——~-——sseywiee tue -aePenaant Bo appear at the next term Dw oo & 8 5.5. go go zs rs “= 5 of the Superior Court of Iredell County, tofwe neaa in Statesville,N.c. on the 22nd day of May,1911, and answer or demar to the Complaint of [l6I the plaintiff, or the relief there This April 5,1911. Dw ° & 8s 5.4. ge go xs mr N ‘SAM [l6I tern if n / ~< ee eer rg ee ; > 4 YY Oabord l , ss PP eer see aoe Boatwright, T. W. vs. Boatwright,L.N. 1911 SITY “Iousyog Souler “Iousyog Cl6l "SA Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-'07-2M. : | STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ee County--GREETING: : AAW, Ih Ma sertrin. mex; then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of in a certain controversy before-said Court depending, and then an ere to be tried, wherein Defendant WITNESS, O1TV “Iausyog ouler “Iousyou Cl6l “SAS aa PhO 3... Release y VA BOK WALL Plaintiff.......... O1TV “Iausyog Souler “Iousyog Cl6l “SA en a vw 5-15-07-2M. x ans eo for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant............ And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. , Clerk of our said Court, at office WITNESS, ..Monday after the of faz, Lae sy ‘Iouayog oulef “Jousyoq C16! “SAS. No a SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. Soy “Iousyog euler “Jousyog “SAS. C16! State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of bro Lh 4X county—GREETING: Dou are | ms nded tele nn Bohemian the defendant ..above named, if Dh be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for E County of, four Lh at the Court House in ~on the b.- Monday after the... / m Monday of . Mork he the same being the . 2 7 day of foatnnnes 19/2, and answer the complaint, a copy of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three whieh willbe deposited in the office days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if rats.they fail to answer to the said complaint ...will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. within that time, the plaintiff... Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Z, £: Dre ) Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. iSFz day, of ..a=.. eqn han........19-L4....... WA MOAL ALA... | =" 140 perior Court Zit LLL county. Clerk of SIV “Iousyog cules ‘Jouayog Cl6l ‘SAS "0} a[qeaan}ey “Jo Jn0D JoOTIadNg eq} jo “age? ‘m3 ryt LSNIVOV 431799 YO SNOWWAS 7 { Proubyy <gnareia . /\ j ‘ ’ a > - ~~ jo Aep SI} 9M aTOJaq pequosqns puke 0} DIOMG ‘suorynoaxe urtoly ydurexa Ayradoid pur sartiqet] ‘siqep SIy eAoqe pue 19A0 SIB[JOp peypuny Om} JO WINS 94} 40M st aq SXes WIOMS BuIEq (‘je9g) ~ (‘je9g) ~ (1e9g) 61 ‘qa ‘Vv jo Aep Siq} ‘s[vas pue spuey Ino ssouyIM “do1}joe Siq} Ul yuureld 94} JO J9AOV01 Avul juBpUIjeEd aq} se yS09 yons [18 juepuayeg ay} Avd [jeys BUA |_ ya Jf “aaaaoy ‘pIOA aq 03 ‘sIe][OC” jO WINS 34} Ut ‘UOT}OR SIT] UI" yUBpUajeq 343 OJUN pUNog saajasino sBpa;MouyoV 9, ISNIVOV ( ‘Ayanod ‘yunod soOEdNg aq} UT | ‘WNIMONV¥D HLNON 4O SL¥LS North Carolina, In the Superior Court, SOV “Iauayog Souler “Iousyog Iredell County. January,term, 1912, ‘SAS James Bohener " Vs, COMPLAINT Cl6l Alice Bohener The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges: -First- That sometime during the month of February, 1907, in Davie County, State of North Carolina, the plaintiff . s and defendant tnlerarr dal s and lived together as man and wife until the defendant abandoned the p&aintiff in August, 1907 y Ganck ha CNL. Nar rong anh Uf. -~Second-= That soon after the marriage of the plaintiff and defendant , the said defendant, without any cause or reason whatsoever, and without any fault on the part of the plaintiff, began to neglect, mistreatcand to shamefuully abuse’ the plaintiff, by abandoning her home, neglecting and deserting the plaintiff, until in August, 1907, totally disregarding the solemn,of the marriage vow, the defendant entirely left and abandoned the plaintiff and wilfully and without cayse took up with ae commited adultry with one Ed Turneyand Breni—inox hpi colored men, who then lived in Iredell County, which relation contimued to exist, constantly and habitually for a period of about three months, and defendant then left the County and now lives somewhere unknown to plaintiff, and since the defendant abandoned the plaintiff she has given birth to a child not by the plaintiff but whose farther is not known, Jousyog Jousyog sory * SA Soumeg < Cl6l » «Third. That the plaintiff has not received the defendant in congugal embragses since his knowledge of her conduct and since she abandoned him-as set out above, -Fourth- That the plaintiff has been a boni fide resident of the state of North Carolina for more than two years next preceeding théscommencement of this action, -Fifth- That the facts set forth and contained herein “c.seempietet, have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months next preceeding the commencement of this action; WHEREFORE the plaintiff demands judgement that he be granted an absolute divorce from the bomds of f ‘ l Gece matrimony with the defendant. oi James Bohener being duly sworn, deposes and says that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are to the best of his knowlege and belief, and that made out of levity or by true the said complaint is not collusion between himself and the defendant, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in @incerity and truth for the éanses mentioned in the complaint, The facts set forth in the said complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to affiants knowkedge for more than six months prior to the filing of this complaint and that the plaintiff has been a boni fide resident of twis. “thee the State of North Carolina for more thah two years prior t fili f this iplaint, and 1e ent of this to the filing o is complaint, anc ar 1 oe ; - / 7% ie: action, Wig ALA / oN Sworn to and wubscribed before UV Oth 7 TA 1 m6, this themed y of Dec., 1. : Sod MWY sturk, Nps eor@ ss North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County Before the Clerk. SOTY “Iausyog Souler “Iauayog “SAS. Cl6l Yames Bohener --V8s-- AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF TO OBTAIN Alice Bohener SERVICE BY PUBLICATION. James Bohener, the plaintiff in the above entitled action, maketh oath that the defendant Alice Boehner, cannot after due diligence be found within the State of North Carolina; that said plaintiff has a good cause of action against said defendant, to wit, a cause of action for divorce absolute on the grounds thet said defendant has committed the act of adultery, being the wife of said plaintiff, which aerate a cause fon divorce by the laws of North Carolina; that said defendant formerly of Iredell County, North Yarolina, has departed from the State and that personal service cannot, be had in this action wherein James Bohener, plaintiff seeks a divorce absolute from said defendant: That, Summons in said action was duly issued on Le ey of te bin ,1911, by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County, and returned by the sheriff of said County endorsed "Defendant not to be found within the State ar County ,after due dilligence to lccate her." Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 1 0 aay of ee vt Liusre ¥ Bptivae \ Mp4 Py a : l y- Vs () a A Shhu ox: LLL AL, LLAMVA U.5.C. i ”) 4 Nd KZ soy ‘Iouayog ourer ‘Tousyog Cl6l “SAS & North Carolina, { In the Super@or Court, Iredell County, { Before the Clerk. James Bohener { Vs. { ORDER OF PUPLICATION, Alice Bohener {f This cause coming on to be heard and being heard, and it appearing to the Court from the affidavit of James Bohener, the plaintiff in the above entitled action, that the defendant can not after due diligence be found in the State, and thet the plaintaff has a goodcause of action against the defendant, and it futher appearing to the Court that the defendant has departed from the State and that her whwreabouts is now unknown to the plaintiff; it is therefore ordered by the 6ourt thet notice of thas action be advertised in the Sentinel, a newspaper, published in Iredell County, for four suucessivefreeks setting forth the title of the action, with a brief and plain statement of the cause and subject matter of the action and the subject matter thereof, and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of Iredell Superior Court, to be held on the Fifth Monday before the First Vonday of March, the same being the 29th, day of January, 1912, and answer or demur to the complaint of said plaintiff, 9 a ci. This the <@ day of Dec,, 1911, Otsleale, Fi C,- "Ben, 1, 1912 ygg_ Lewis and Lewis, Attorneys NW _5_-x, -Hartnes »-Clerk Superior Court ---IN ACCOUNT WITH... 4 It Will Bring You Returns. . a Bohener, James vs. Bohener, Alice 1912 Po1]Y “Iausyog ouler ‘Jousyog SAS C16! oy Ret ,_ of Iredell ‘County, State of North Carolina, wherein the said_ plaintiff sues. for a divorce absolute from said defendant on the grounds of Adultry on the part of said de- fendant, and the said defendant f required to appear and answer dng-xaeto—! woussen “¥ “= Y/G or demur to the complaint at the an. term of Iredell Superior ‘ourt, which will be held at tatesville, Iredell County, N. “YIM TOF IS ? 1S YP2OPT7O ——— 6 C “""HLIM LNNOOOV NI*** which time sai returnable,-or judgment will be given against her at said term of court. : J. A. Hartness, C. S. C. Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys. — This 2ist day of Dec. 1911. 4t | SN 7 ' | r sfeui0i3y ‘sTMeT pues stMeT ° ‘oO 6 > = to 2 2 ~ 2 zx = | @ 2 e Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally 911V “Iauayog ower ‘Iouayog “SA S ap Bohener | " defendant above named, ~ sf, : Cl6l {t a summons in the above en- | ed action was issued against * fe said defendant on the 19th + Hay of Dec. 1911, by Jas, A. | . ‘Hartness, C. S. C., of Iredefl ~ ‘County, State of North Carolina, } wherein the said plaintiff sues | for a divorce absolute from said ~ defendant on the grounds of Adultry on the part of said de- | fendant; and the said defendant is required to appear and answer or demur to the complaint at the © Jan. term of Iredell Superior i ‘Court, which will be held at © Statesville, Iredell County, N. C., on the ; MONDAY BEFORE ‘THE FIRST MONDAY IN | ‘MARCH, the same being the : 29th day of January, 1912, at — which time said summons ismade — ‘returnable, or judgment will be _ given against her at said term of — J. A. Hartness, C. 8. C. Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys. — This 2ist day of Dec. 1911. 4t ' ——$_$_—_—_————— ° | I 5 dng-ya0to—*mourssH “FF /G 720977?) © 1 w € ee ea “Sis pa HLIM LNNOOOYV NI*** “yIM0N IJ0OF se D LG ina a 4 sfeuir073y ‘stTMe] pues sTMeT - > 3 bw = a < Fe 2 2 . a lease Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally 211y Jousyog ower ‘Jousyog “SAS ofhe defendant above named, 4 » Bohener, will take notice “16 Hay of Dec. 1911, by Jas, A. | . Hartness, C. S. C., of Iredell County, State of North Carolina, ) wherein the said plaintiff sues | for a divorce absolute from said ~ defendant on the grounds of | Adultry on the part of said de- | fendant, and the said defendant a: is required to appear and answer ; or demur to the complaint at the ‘Jan. term of Iredell Superior Court, which will be held at © ‘Statesville, Iredell County, N. C., on the a FIFTH MONDAY BEFORE THE FIRST MONDAY IN ; ‘MARCH, the same being the 29th day of January, 1912, at which time said summons is made returnable, or judgment will be given against her at Said term of court. J. A. Hartngss, C. S. C. Lewis & Lewis, Attorneys. This 2ist day of Dec. 1911. 4t ————_—_———————— | I dng-yaeTo !sousseH VF ae EE "HIIM INAODOV NI" ) 5 W778 “YIMOD TOF se e sfeur033zy ‘stMe] pues stMeT Q oO - > S rs 2. a ~~ e 2 = © 2 e Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally edly “Jousyog ower ‘Tousyog C161 “SAS. a's the Best People of Thiand Adjoining Counties ‘ Sialeall, F.C’ ven 1, 1918 ggy —Clerk Superior Court. . Lewis and Lewis, Attorneys -IN ACCOUNT WITH. TH STATESVILLE ‘SENT! NEL Published Every Thursday Morning . SUBSCRIPTION PRICE ONE DOLLAR PER YEAR IN ADVANCE Aldoertising Rates are Reasonatle. It Will Bring You Returns. Publication of notice of summons ; saline Jas. Bohener vs, Alice Bohener Cd re, ee : ‘ Bae Si ali St ST ESR RAN, 2 Joke ve, Manatees Aree ai ete BPS soTV Jousyog cules ‘Tousyog C161 ‘SAS. James Bohener { Vs, { ISSUES, Alice Bohener, |{ lst, Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry - @8 alleged in the complaint? Ans, “fr end, Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State orth Carolina for two years next ‘preceding the bringing of N of this action? Ans, 4d 5rd, Did the defendant commit adultery as alleged in the complaint? Ans, S91TV “Iousyog cules ‘Iousyog Cl6l “SA S North Carolina, { In the Superior Court, Iredell County { May Term, 1912, James Boherer Vs, JUDGMENT, Alice Bohener, This cause coming on to be heard before His, Lane, Judge Presiding, and a jury at the superior Court of Irddell County, Honor, H.P. c , May Term, 1912 of the s follows: hay and the jury having answered the issues a ist, Did the @im plaintiff and defendant as alleged in the complaint? Yes, 9een a resident of the State the plaintiff be two years next preceding the bringing ‘ Has of North Carolina for of this action? Ans, Yes, adultery as alleged ‘ore considered adjudged by the Court atrimony heretofore existing be are hereby ljiafan lant ‘ ‘ A\4C4114U — at a wal pgeipaies eset. wa ing “ena ' | Bohener, James vs. Bohener, Alice 1912 SUMMONS POR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. Yer eh _ County—In the Superiar Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ‘ ey) g Q. © 0 co G < ‘SA JOB “UOpuelg L161 the defendant... above named, if 1 Kesre found within your ae to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of ..-at the, Court House in Sra hele on the--L{ Monday after the.._|____ Monday of m 191.7__, and answer the complaint, a copy of the same being the..*] day OE nn pa which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first they fail to answer to the said three days of said Term, and let said Defendant will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- complaint within that time, the plaintiff plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this bth " Gk Clerk of joumby 8[¥98 PUB SpuBY Ino sseUqT A “4 Term, 191___- oyu Pung s9AjesIno eSpe;MouyoR 04 of the Superior Cotirt of__.___________ County. ~ VYNI'IONVI HLYON AO ALVLS re ere nna ndanenet man go Sup------~-s1yy i—VInuow » f : 3 nD < ° 5 s eS 5 a 7 os 5 & = S = @ B ® co = Be ' ' ' ! i o =x = ° - alt ¢ ‘suor;noexe Worl ydutexe Ayzodoad puv sorytqery ‘S}q9P SIY eAOge puv JdA0 que “moTow Sty} Uy —-—"-“BHUPe_Y oy} JO 1ea00er vu ~-----yuepuezoq oy} se ys00 2 "j4nog 4orsodngy oy} uy x % “ae et Fae We, | Soe ) Deetarterhaetrberlaeeieeterlateteteiatataiatetatatatatatatatetat athe TOY WOE. WIT eae ee ee ‘WoT}Oe SIY} UI ~~--yu¥puezecy oy} yous [[® ~~~---yuepuezeq oy} Aed Wr eee Rey nee ee 04} JI ‘“TeAdmoy (Teg SiB][Op peripuny Om} Jo wns oy} YOM st oy Shes UIOMS BuIeq ~----------------------------------~__ Plaintiff’s Attorney. 4 Brandon, Walter vs. Brandon, Dusty 1917 RIOT ‘Aajmerg "SA assor ‘AoTMeIg LI6l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. OC. hell ____County—In the Superior Court. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant_. above named, if. @ xe found within your County, to ypear before the Judge of ier Coprt; at a Court to be held for thy Copnty_pf_-_- ..-at the Court House in Zon the...2.. Monday 23 the same being the y pence ., and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior ee said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant_....take notice if----= .they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff ----- will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- . on” plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seak of said Court, this JL .-.889 geno ATA : lh ALA Us n_is - Tt <=---*A4 fn nn nena nnn nn ne== Clerk of Superior one eed Ml..conar PVA I OY} Jt “A9aemoy osqus Puv 0} UIOMG ‘8314°P SITY @A0q” puR aeA0 WOrjOw s1y} UT ~"~“pUBpuazaq ayy “SIQ} ‘syves pue Spuvy ano ssouyr yy jsuwby oyUN puNog seaayasino eSpo[mouyoe 04 doid pure SOTTIIQRI] JO ums oy} ur ‘ - eee TS jo | YNITIONVWO HLYION 4O ALVLS ( ‘fijunog--- PNA T Ay} JO taa0001 Leu ~~" “guepuezeqy oy} se ys00 JO ABp---~----sry our alozeq paqt - “SUOT}NOGXe WOIy yduIexe A410 AGS UIOMS JZuteq ~--------------- “UOT}OB SITY} UT ~----- ‘J4AN0D snnsadng ayy uz ‘SaB]oq-~-- GE it: yous |[[@ ~ ~~""“yuepueyaq oyy ed 1eqs---------- “PIOA aq 04 a = ® me a = = 3 co a a = ® n 2 e B > a) oo = Ss S = a s S S Brawley, Jesse vs. Brawley, Lola 1917 Bp] ‘Agmvig "SA ossor ‘Aamelg LI61 Nertk C relina, 4 In the Superier Court, Iredell Geunty. ( January Terwm,1918. Jease Brawley § Va. ¢ COMPLAIN Y, Lela Brawley 4 The plaintiff eewmplaining ef the defendant, fer cause ef action, alleges aw says: ~First~ That en er abeut the 26th. day ef September, 1910, in Iredell C’unty, State ef Nerth Carelina, the plaintiff and the defendant intermarried and lived te gother until their seperation during tae nenth ef Auguat., 1916, and they are “ow man and wife, ~Sacend~ That the defendant teek up With and cemitted adultry with ene Clarence Cgriten during said menth ef August,1916, said action heing the eause ef the seperation ef plaintiff and defendant, and that she, the said defendant, cemmitted adultry with ether persens whose naheos are unmknewn te thés plaintiff. ~Trird~ That the plaiatiff han net received the defendant in eon jugal eubraces since his knowledge ef her conduet end wince they ae perated as abeve set eut, “Feurth- — Tat tke pladatiff has been a buni fide residdnt ef tae State ef Nerth Carelina fer rere than twe years next preceeding the eovmencement of thia action, | -Fifth- That the factsoset ferth and contained herein have existed te the knewledge ef the plaintiff fer mere than six menths next proeceding the eenmencement ef this action. WHERLFORK, the plaintiff demands judgment that he be granted an abselute diveres frem the bends ef matrineny with ihs eee SR rat ye: A Pekan ~4+t~ RIOT ‘Aajmeig "SA OSSof ‘Ao|MBIg LI61 Nerth C relina, 4 In the Superier Court, Iredell Ceunty. § January Terw, 1918. Jease Brawley { Vs. 4 GOR PLA IK FT, Lela Brawley 4 The plaintiff eewplaining ef the defendant, fer cause ef action, alleges aw says: ~First~ That en er abeut the 28th. day ef Soptember,191@, in Iredell CY’pnty, State ef Nerth Carelina, the plaintiff and the defendant intermarried and lived te gether until their seperation during tae nenth ef Auguat , 1916, and they are now man and wife, ~Secend~ That the defendant took up With and comritted adultry with ene Clarence Cgriten during said month of August,1916, said action heing the eause ef the seperation eof plaintiff and defendant, and that ske, the said defendant, committed adultry with ether porsens Whbse nakeos are unknewn te thts plaintiff, ~Trird- That the plaietiff han met received the defendant in eon jugal eubraeen since his knewledgs ef hor conduct end since they seperated as abeve set eut, . ~Feurtk- Taat tko plaintiff has been a buni fide residdnt ef tae State ef Nerth Carelina fer rere than twe years next preeeeding the sovmencement ef thia action, “Fifth~ That the factdoset ferth and contained horein have existed te the knewledge ef the plaintiff fer mere than six menths next proeeeding the eemmencement ef this action, WHERLFORK, the plaintiff demands judgment that he be granted an abselute d@iveree frem the bends ef matrineny With etry efendant. ge fos RIOT ‘Aajmevig © "SA assor ‘Aojmelg Li6! Jease Brawley being duly swern, says:That the faets set. ferth in the feregeing complaint are true te the best ef his knowledge and belief, and that the said cemplaint is net made eut ef levity er by collusion between himself and the defendant, and net fer the mere purpese ef being fraed and seperated fren each ether, but in | sineerity and in truth fer the causes mentioned in the eemplaint ; that the faeta set ferth in said complaint as preunds fer diverse hove exhiated tebffiants knewledge fer mere than six nenths prior te the semencement of this actien er the filing ef this eexpisiant; and that the plaintiff has boen a heoni fide resident ef the State ef Nerth Carelina fer mere than twe years prier te the commencement ef this aetien er the filing ef this eomplaint, Swern te and subseribed before me, this the 4th. day ef December ,1917, Ch Mbt 42 our. i Jesse Bravley § Vs. t Vee vee, RIOT ‘Agjmeig "SA OSSaf ‘AojmBIg Lela, Bravlern ¢ LI61 Ast. Did the plaintiff and defendant intermarry as alleged in.the Cemplaint? Answer. 2nd, Has the plaintiff been a beni fide resident ef the State ef Nerth Carelina fer twe years next proceeding the eomrencerent ef this actien? Answer. 3rd, Did the defendant commit adultry as alleged in the eomplaint? Answer. 2 velwatd @ase’ ~ a -—— ewe ee ee ee oe - Brawley, Jesse vs. Brawley, Lola 1917 ere putt (re sOSE Daven Ss etatzs aticf es Ceoeef hare fee chr tqen tn ae aiff Cunt Caeee SJ 22 0 Lee Lee dh harggte Canine: can. Alek, Mrkdags ee | J0SCO_, Ad tv-cLh and Aa Cocer 22220 ban acc i de, cose coi le 2 eee —_—_— ee Joe frente 1 h2~ 21. /Szesrettey, Zoe ~ cer OR ey oA Jw €c22-ofefeer des | Cater ln LesereG * C4 £, Le Cicer A com einer enced Apnea fe la wt fain PN BP ON EGS otal a AR 5 Znpengllees flr La CL gesme sepa, Ko baa ala Cea, Citieczee comin Menagewng er Mate RS a ce, Oe eeleaes et (lect Joced coc ttt Lice, Conn, Cee 6 ek ahidnrnte af fe- sancti ut ef Little fir. re. £0 CU, Joe dua et ae ag CRGCS gates ian: oe tp. r fe ce Cff J + at atin ae 2C e212 » fle Ute agg@gee€ pled Corre tf Cen oy Lippe Ap hfe toryzec EC ¢ ola hie <i es ff meee Aeclhn iia F V—_— ! ee Ewe les tfeaea Glo 2-4 eccee OS SOPs. DS foc bee t Ae. Aatcct vig gee nea | Foovforss Ate Liesl ivy anaed | 4 tr, te Pe tt. Mei WN ek LeaZ ne wel ee <A, Lege< hip a Lee eee be tee. at / irlece 4 tee feet coe | eee ef. Ae7 Leen | le pol, ee Zoe a Lh prornw Ca Soceeree ZAez, J AC tiny jvc: il a ola SE cet EL cere Keg ceeemngy ea: a eae eee occa le: eel ee A At elt Cen ee z+ a Se ele 2K Leer fo2t-tlatelen Lei a we cf -heertlee~< FE . prec O< fhiecty lan f- i Zoe Mee. Cotter [ 2 Actrlee ameece xtc Livan if Pe mtecectety eerie: eae Lee ce ANA Son bh fered cet | (Le er Jsfowt<«t1 * 4 pup eee GOT Rib aie iD Wate Bivics tie to ae) ee ee (perth te blr Jor pout Crvetf Lecce et ee ee ae bi ketenes f2-eee- ee AS, ee Ltr tA. Cet l flict he ce ce -G ken © Prose Le A, 421 Se ah hes pk wa < aoe ~7 AS at, Z2zZ eve rle_ LL A ca in pe, “242 4 re JF arte ~ las ae aaZar ant | fALG POA ferlh tu klar Jan fret Leetfe Lecce et eee AD fete eeEF fue het -2e a freee a al eee, 44 Cer I tt Loe Viflecs the ce ce Ce-G fe cel Lgl i Gy 421 lel: I 4 let eel tere tel fae Len -<ty 2h Bt Caled. ae tee Laie. bi Azo tend phiceck « Arrey, e218 pu ler 420644 fee a , fr Minter feeZrorip bee <- fe ce +4 ee hificsn Cate fp even Cove, Ct ae Pine ncGpane sen tus Da Sy NS a Ms forded, tetathec tA nnth Local sil sae Let JertOn \Ze~ aoa Curtep “ee~< wel AY S2recereoo FT fo (et O8Es, Lec tn eK Afacd Leet, Lt Ze eF Jateceet : cle, sactwee Pet 1x Pax teeceecsey On-oen bles fe lary Ch Me 4 Cove Jelicoee| ice Bez7 | J heeer 4 LAr XX fir Zitet~ A at aS po (Pt C214 wie ta Zrwe decerD Ce 044. Le alnagg uth Laie ins tiie | at AteLte— Woe-121 GP eg ee Otc sof Kafe. 20 ae (is fi. 4 VAG? ALAS. de Ha i Ber A a Z | 7 + 5 a Luck Me gfereen et 2 he a | leerc Cle hoCeen 2220 Ze22ec< Coot 1 “22% Me! Kap ivg 64 lec per CHEZ Z » Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Distt County--GREETING: Defendant WITNESS, , Clerk of our said Court, at office Monday after the............. .Monday County. BD 5 ° Bp i e. 5 wD & oe 6 P > 5 3 5 < r [161 D 5 ° r a E = wD & a 6 P > & ° 5 < - L161 erne uoLng ‘SA UOIeYy “UOLINg [161 | , N.C, SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville County.-~ In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of NorthiCarolina. Md aE Rite Cou nty-GREETING: the defendant... above Nene, ¢f... ,-be found within your and appear before the a of nty, oe perior Court, ata Court to be held for tt County of. og ak, fat th the C ies sec ael M, on the 4 -Monday after the. { =.........Monday/of' 2. the same being the LO day of 194.4 and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court 'for Said’ County, ‘within the first three’ days of said Term, and let said Defendant))!...,take notice if they fail to answer to the said complaint will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return Within that time, the plaintiff... ' ; Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. oa L Kotaty. Q. ~~ Ye <Z V oF 2 “JO YANO soredng en} jo —“ FHF ‘a9, Spans 2[(QeuINj2y V sgnarelg LSNIVOV $2103} ti 4117374 Y04 SNOWWAS SI} 2UI a10Jeq pequiosqns pu 0} MIOMG ‘snorynoexa wos ydurexa Ayredoid pue sayiiqet] ‘siqep Siq eA0qe pue 1940 SI¥[JOp peypuny OM} jo UNS 34} 40M st oq SX¥S TOMS Su1eq™ “yo Asp ~oooonee gi (sigas PUB SPUBY INO Ssoujt ‘noHoB sq} a BPALET_ 2q} JO Jea0ces Avr yUBpRaFed 94} SB S09 ~~ Baye” yp Ft ‘9Aamoqg LSNIVOV *Ayanog ‘¥NITIONYOD HLYUON JO GLYLS ‘yunod soyedng 24} U] \ eine ‘uouNg ‘SA UOIeYy “UOLINg [161 eine “uouNg ‘SA uoIeYy “UOLNgG 1161 # fe North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Oct., Term, I9II. Aaron Burton Vs. COMPLAINT. Julia Burton. Therlaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges: First.That on or about the- Texas,the plaintiff and defendant were married and lived together as man and wife until the defendant adandoned the plaintiff in July,1903. Second. That soon after the! marriage of of the plaintiff and def- endant,the said defendant,without any cause or reason whatever,and without any fault on the part of the plaintiff,began to neglect , mistreat and to shamefully abuse the plaintiff by abandoning her hone,neglecting and deserting the plaintiff,until in July,of the said year, 1903, totelly disregarding the solenminity of the marriage vow,the defendant entirgly left and abandoned the plaintiff and willfully and without cause took up with and committed the act of adultry end lived in fornication and adultry with one Will.Stewart, . a colored man,who then lived in the City of *tatesville,which re- Jv > , ation continued to exist,constantly and habatually for a period of about me the seid defendant took up with another colored man,one J/illiam “enry,with whom she fleed the State bg a ct AuLee going to the State of Penn-,where she lived in fornication,with’ said r294 I . * a+ William Henry and finally married said “illiem enry and lived in @ bigimous relation with him and still now continues to live,sone- where unknown to this plaintiff,in the ssid unlawful and notorious bigimous relation with the said William 4enry. Third. That the plaintiff has not received the defendant-in cunguga —embrases since hig knowledge of her conduct and since she aband — oned him as above ourth. That ¢t nlaintiff has been a boni tate of N. more than two years next encement of eine “UoUNng "SA uOseYy “WONG 1161 Pifth.That the facts set fourth and contained herein as a comp- laint have exhisted to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more tha«\. six months next preceeding the commencement of thie action: Wherefore the plaintiff demands judgement that he be granted an absolute Divorce from the bonds of matrimony with the defendant. Atty.for pidint Aaron Burton being duly aworn, epeseasend says that the facts set fourth in the foregoing complaint are true tothe best of his kn —~ owledge and belief,and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between himself and the defendant,and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other,b buf in sincerity and trouth for the causes mentioned in the comp- laint. The facts set forth in the said complaint as grounds for divo— ree,have exhisted to affiants knowledgeefor more than six months srior to the filing of this complaint and that the plaiMire has been a boni fide resident of the State of N.C. for more than two years prior to the filing of the complaint. Sworn to and subscribed pefore,This Sth.day of Sept.IgIii. f oS ‘ poeritwernr- =~ gt < North Carolina, In the Superior Court- Iredell County. ; Before the Clerk. Aaron Burton Vs.x Order of Publication: Julia Burton This cause coming on to be heard and being heard and it gppear- ing to the court from the affidavit of Aaron Burton,the plaintiff in the above entitle® action,that the defendant can it etter due diligence be found in the state,and that the plaintiff has a good cause of action against said defendant,and it further appearing that said defendant has departed has departed the "tate and that her whereabouts is now unknown to the Plaintiff; It is therefore ordered by the,court that notice of this action be advertised in the Sentenial,a Newspaper,published in Iredel] County,for four suc- cessive weeks,setting fourth the title of the action,with a brief and plain statement of cause and subject matter of the action and the subject matter thereof,and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of Iredell Superior Court,to be held on the eight Munday after the first Munday of Sept.,the same being the 30th.day of Oct.,i9iI,and answer or demur to the complaint of said plaintiff . This 6th.day of Sept.,I9II. / AG.S.C. ww 55 BB i B 3 3 é L161 Dw 5 & os 5 5 PP i = > = 8 & 6 3 < fh L161 In the Superior Court - North Carolina, Before the Clerk: Iredell County. : Aaron Burton Vs. Affidavit of plaintiff to obtain Julia Burton. service by publication. Aaron “urton,the plaintiff in the above entitled action, maketh oath that the defendant, Julia Surton, cannot after due diligence be found withiz the State of North Yarolina:that said plaintiff has a good cause of action against said defendant,to Wit:a cause of actio for divorce absolute on the grounds that said defendant has committ the act of adultry,being the wife of said plaintiff,which act is ma a cause of divorce by the Laws of N.C.:That said defendant, formally of Iredell CO.,.C.,has departed from the State and that personal service cannot be had in this action wherein Aaron Burton,plaintif?f seaks a divorce absolute from said defendant:That Summons in said action was duly issued on 6th.Sept.I9II,by the Clerk of The Super- ior of iredell CO,,and returned by the sheriff of said CO.endorsed "Defendant notito be found within the State or CO. after due diligence to locate her". Sworn to and subscribed before me, a This 6th.Sept.,I9II. Be Wheat it VA ck. Ruel —_ ~ = a © > = &. 5: wD cS a = > es) 3 ° b= | - Y L161 < North “arolina. In the Superior Court’ lredell Vounty. Oct> Term. ,I9II. ' Aaron urton Vau \ issues / Julia Burton, I. Were the Lpaintiff and deferiant inter-married as alled- ged in the Complaint? Clewctvey~ tA” ©, Has the ‘laintiff been a boni-fide résident of the State of North Carolina for more tham two years next preceeding the commencement of this action- ? 226 CT AA 3. Did the -defendazit.eabandon the “laintiff and commit Adultry as alledged in the Complaint? Cdetwt— ne Burton, Aaron vs. Burton, Julia 1911 PE a a wo & PP j * > &. & = © Oo 3 - ¥ L161 Vv North #rolina, In the Buperior Court, Iredell County Sct. ,Term,, 1911. Aaron Burton ty VS. JUDGEMENT. Julia Burton: This cause coming on to be heard and being heard before lis Honor, M.H.Justice,judge presiding,and the Jury,and the ‘ury having answered ail the issues submitted to them by the Court “in favor of the “laintiff and against the defendant; $e 474 x ui 1erefore ordered and decreed by the Court that the LoD Al bonds Qf matrdmony shall be ,dissdlved and that the *laintiff shall have a Divorce absolute from the defendant. It is further ordered by the Court that the = all costs of this action. Burton, Aaron vs. Burton, Julia 1911 eine ‘UOUNg ‘SA UOIeY ‘UOLINg [16 Judgment Against if g Bond, including Justification... . . ¢|] Appeal from Justices Appeal from Clerk to Judge Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . rder of Arrest Subpoena, cach name Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian .. ... . . Continuance veat to a Will, entering and docketing Iesuing Commission. . . Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support ..... . Docketing same Docketing ¢2 parte Proceedings Judgment . Summons Indexing Judgment Filing Papers. . . Postage, actual Transcript of Jud Execution heriff’s Return. . Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00]]. Transcript to Supreme Court. .. . copy sheets, each. . County Tax, when Jury impareled Referee'’s Allowance Constable. .. Magistrate Plaintiff's Witnesses Defendant’s Witnesses... . CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF GCOSTS--CIVIL. (As Fixed by the Code.) he Burton, Aaron vs. Burton, Julia 1911 3-29-’011M SUMMONS FOR RELIBE,—Judge.—Printed and for Sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. oey ‘siskg ‘SA MOIpUY ‘sIokg 8061 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the Defendant Court, ata = be held for the County of ...¢ 7 &@y—< . at the Court House in —e —_ on the. hl wont Monday after the r ——...... Monday of ee the same being the . EY. air at OY ana answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of ty Superior Court for sai! County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant... take notice if fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff .. will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. 4 LG Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this day of Clerk of Superior Court sey ‘siskg ‘SA MaIpuy ‘sIokg 8061 ‘Asuio}Yy suet “ PIATIOIY ~ 0} aIIqQeUINJey aalTde HOt SNOWANS ynog sonedng ay} jo LSNIVOV ~ fo hop ~ $14) au a40fag pagisosgns pun 0} usomg *suonnoaxa wos ydwaxa Ajsadoad pun sarjipqnry ‘syqep sty anogn pup 4ano SaDyjop paapuny om} yo wns ay2 yj40m $1 ay sfivs usoms Burag ~ (“q0g) “—~ $149 ‘s]Das. pub spuny.ino ssaujijy “uonjaD sty) ul" iguinyy 94) fo uanoved fou’: “puefeq ey} sv 4800 yons yo ~~ yuppuefog oy) find yyoys ay) ft ‘4anamoy ‘pron aq 07 ‘sunjjog "74n0) 4014adns ay} uy '“¥YNITONVOD HLNON AO FLY¥LS 40 wns oy) ut “uonoD sry) ur guopuafog oy; oun punog sanjas..no abpaymouyov a4 LSNIVOV “ALNNOI é-1 : , at a Vylweccar __| Ki. hoy if Vrorek 1908. Cah if difirim Oust Sb) NORTH CAROLINA, } In the Superior Court, IREDELL COUNTY. ) May Term, 1908. aey ‘siokg Andrew Byers, ‘SA MOIpUY ‘sIokg ) Plaintiff, ) v- ) COMPLAINT. ) ) ) 8061 Katie Byers, Defendant. The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges: 5 That the plaintiff and the defendant were married in the State of North Carolina in the month of December, 1896, and lived to- gether as man and wife until the defendant abandoned the plaintiff in the year 1905. 2. That sometime before the defendant abandoned the plaintiff, the defendant committed adultery with one Levi Perry during the . plaintiff's enforced absence from home. That plaintiff did not know of nor suspect the conmission of the said act of adultery until after the defendant abandoned him in the year aforesaid. 3e That the plaintiff has not received +he defendant in conju- gal embraces since she abandoned him. 4 That the vlaintiff has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than two years before the filing of this plaint, or the commencement of this action. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands judgment that he be - granted an absolute divorce from the bonds of matrimony with the fendant. >» Wy Andrew Byers, being duly sworn, says that the facts set forth in the complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and be- lief, and thatthe said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between him and the defendant; and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint. The facts set forth in the complaint, as grounds for divoree, have existed to his know=- ledge at least six months prior to the filing of the complaint, and that plaintiff “as been a resident of the State for two years next vreceding the filing of the complaint. Sworn to and subscrihed before e this Zaday of Zu 1908 ~~ a p ¢ me thisg Amey of 4 ipa & : juris buble c L Lpiviti{-tvre 1 f hey Orenipetecvee Ltflevin fuer 2/70 Byers, Andrew vs. Byers, Katie 1908 — — — = 2 Dat a eee all EERE SS oe Byers, Andrew vs. Byers, Katie 1908 Byers, Andrew vs. Byers, Katie 1908 aney ‘siakg ‘SA MOIpUY ‘sIokg 8061 Ta ST Pe « a a to the te relief demand- ' ed in said complaint. J. A. HARTNESS, ajey ‘siskg ‘SA MaIpUuy ‘sIokg ‘Oo oS oo “ NOTICE, thé defendant above bl will | take notice that an action entitled as above has-been. commenced in- the superior court of Iredell county for absolute divoree on the. ground of adultry committed beh tween Byers and Levi Peary; and; ‘the said defendant will further’ ‘take notice that she is required to. appear at the next term of the su-— perio? court of said county to be’ held on the 11th Monday after the | 1st Monday of Mareh, the same being the 18th day of May, 1908, : at the court house of ‘said county | in Statesville, N. C., and answer or demur to the complaint in said , action, or the plaintiff will apply | to the court for the relief demand- ed in said complaint. J. A. HARTNESS, , Clerk Superior Court. sey ‘siskg ‘SA MAIpUY ‘sIakg ‘Oo oS oo NORTH CAROLINA, . Superior Court, Spring Term 1908. _ Andy Byers vs. Katie Byers. |” ', ~ NOTICE. Thé defendant above named will take notice that an action entitled as above has-been commenced in— the superior court of Iredell county for absolute divorce on the ground of adultry committed be-) tween Byers and Levi Peary; and | ‘the said defendant will further take notice that she is required to | appear at the next term of the su- perior court of said county to be’ held on the 11th Monday after the | 1st Monday of March, the same, being the 18th day of May, 1908, ' at the court house of said county | in Statesville, N. C., and answer or demur to the complaint in said , action, or the plaintiff will apply | to the court for the relief demand- | ed in said complaint. J. A. HARTNESS, Clerk Superior Court. ojey ‘siskg ‘SA MoIpUY ‘sIokg i A GOOD ADVERTISER yy . soyth Iredell. ae Rates Made Known on Request £ L f get. Mooresville, N. c SSS Sees 8061 The en Pa i omy | cL - 2 Commit “a ode th Ye - er 1n~v~. ? t 2. sage <a Cy oes ye Byers, Andrew vs. Byers, Katie 1908 SP Bk SERS ST Fado Ee ee ere a ce i ee ee saree atria sven rennpi ~~ } ; ia te eh aaa artsy Byers, Andrew vs. Byers, Katie 1908 Ai RMR STS RR EN a aN UNE AON SARE TS MR eee EPH Cc 9 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. sarees ~ \_ SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, A Fal To the Sheriff of Gy niet. .County—GREETING : Dou are Derebp COMMANDED to’ summon eeecenvnrnmamennnnnnentnsnntnennennennnene the defendant ...above named, pth. be found within eae to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for, the County of x ¢ Or at ae alvevilh ...on the 6 nc fMonday 7. the [& Monday of -.: ea ot. | the same being the 7! day of QML 40 é...... 191.0, and answer the complaint,'a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the fitst three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if 0 ™ex..they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 43 day vi KA Lf; <4 7 194.2@........ - A Clerk of BEA Cee cL LV, £ 24 County. , Aouen ‘sioAg ‘SA "S SapTeYD “SIOAG L161 LICE OF B[QBEINoYy ‘431134 40d SNOWWAS emo FEE MRP yaNoZ s0ledng eq} jo AMMIONY syyarelg aaa wim “SIY} IMI s1OJaq peqtiosqns pue 0} UIOMS ‘suoIjNoexa wor ydutaxa Ajyradoid pue saryt[1qet] ‘s}qap sy 2Aoge pue 132A0 SI¥[[Op pesJpuny OMj JO UINS 394} 4IOM SI oq Shes UIOMS BuIaq’ (‘jeag) ~ (“]e2g) jo Aep Si} ‘s[vas pue spuey Imo ssouzI My *"dO1j}08 SIq} Ur HyUreld 94} Jo taA0001 Aevum JUBPUJeGq 24} SB 3ys00 yons [Re yuepuajagq ay} Aed jyeys™ Hare] g 94} jt ‘waaamoyq ‘pIOA 9q 0} ‘sre]]Oq~ ; ““JO WINS 34} UT ‘MONjDe sIq} UI" JOepUazeq ey) ‘OJUN PUNO SaAjasIno aspe;Mouyoe 94 LSNIVOV f ‘Ayano en ee YO HLYON 4O TL¥LS “¥NIIO H , Kouen ‘siohg ‘SA “S SapreyD ‘sIohg L16l Kouen ‘sioAg ‘SA “S SapTeYyD ‘sIoAg L161 é a Lae int Reva ft UM Ne < North Carolina { In the Superior Court . Iredell County i October Term,1910 Chas. S. Bgers,Plaintiff. T --V8-- [8 OB PD OL eT Nancy Byers, Defendant I The plaintiff complains and says:- --First-- That he and the defendant intermarried in Iredell County, State of North Carolina, about three years ago, and lived together as man and wife for about one year and a half, when the defendant without any cause on the part of the pleintiff abandoned him, taking with her all of her clothes and possessions and moving away. --Second-- That she declines and refuses to return to the home of the plaintiff, and live with him, es she has not been a wife to him either at home or elsewhere since said abandonment of him and leaving. --Third-- The plaintiff has been a resident 6f the State of North Carolina, and county of Iredell all his life, and he is now about fifty six years of age. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands that a decree of the Court be granted divorcing him from bed and board from the defendant , and that he be free and dieeharged from any and all lisbility and responsibility to the defendent , by rea- son of the marital relations heretofore existing between them , and for such other and further relief, as_mey be just and right. a Pox ce Counsel for Plaintiff, Tee eon) De Sa A it ECR RR ARAL MAN MOR SRO MRT 8 uy ih tag Ee WORN Hane ic mrp Netemtgune mea Te PEL ot ope poe * a North Carolina Iredell County Chas. S. Byers, being duly sworn says, that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that said complaint is not made out of levity or by colusion between husband and wife, and not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the compleint, that the facts set forth in this complaint ,as grounds for divorce have ex- isted to his knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this compleint, and that he has been a resident of this State for more than two years, next proceeding the filing of this Complaint. a (2. Sie Ali psi eat Ato, [| Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 15th day of October,1910. VY MM te batearh Le ae ww tS Oo Oo - Y ¥ ey Be po eo 2 ~~ a < e L161 & North Carolina Iredell County Chas. 8S. Byers, being duly sworn ais: that the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that said complaint is not made out of levity or by colusion betveen husband and wife, anc not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the compleint, that the facts set forth in this complaint ,as grounds for divorce have ex- isted to his knowledge for more than six months prior to the filing of this compleint, and that he has been a resident of this State for more than two years, next proceeding the filing of this Complaint. ee. ie. ix Migueee. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the 15th day of October, a Any G40. O ww i Oo oO 3 re 42 BE eo 2 & “ ~” < ’ L16l wD e *¢ o oe 3 rt. a© a << & “a ye < a L161 Byers, Charles S. vs. Byers, Nancy 1911 | a — C 7 F?0 oy ne 7 3 7 | how Bay pe YG Ph Cote _ a. . — oth “Th ie Ry o~ pe je ak . i Ana yrevred ond Be 2-0 J, La 9 Hh sl Wot i tae ok ae cee J™ ha fto—~ ae : ile LL. ag th Le f rctrie, be deveoS fr bik athea-f 6 a Byers, Charles S. vs. Byers, Nancy 1911 Pika le a Sze ZF VETe 1. boat, se, | Vial Hoe fla FE dirverS fonebgu 2 ea Ves chevelle 1¢ Lo Crib 07 Oe ae ae , yates ng a ae oe deer he : pe Anh COSI Op res ae ee Gh H/ ses es THA. Lap ae Ft flr. F £7 Aten Life we Jiite: K+ ~~ Byers, F. C.— vs. Byers, Levena PR ie: haghs H Lai seek ee CELL Cnet ee ae Pitan ime Mic Lp. lias a Bi Mes Pony wn lenis Prag: Kg. brad co Ctr to ute roe Fuckin, Ce ha & Muth Cogetn, 8% Mey 4g sh rrz6 guy S. po Mes ali Bini fbodin lg. pep, Ome Pian tiles de bah preety ree Lote awe oom & ott. Zuek & A, oN aa Sk reonk epee A, -~ we eek. Kein, aa% Se a) ow het Ate EF Fe ci. — “<.., | ae Hay of — (PE_ a Pecan | Kage fond Contracleh A hee, Oplererecscct haters Blaccdiy a9 Cafe. ctacit fosel Go HCG G An ete tru Goret a Auk ar che frreer4 Lin Mh Gafe tau Rees Lee G SF Ca Lat? Ceeeg aud Noe Hione Clic. Cece Gene frien G Ce Con. . Bnrecceecccee th Lt we Ge _ Afee._tar-€ 2.15 for beco€ echan n Wit Coxe decay Aszicese 2.5 ‘ y is. lH dong fe P-L ff é | - tage! oS oor i. Crnfelacubh ote Gu. Le bash af her Moet tbge anT LAY aut hah Hey Corn - plaid th wh mode aud of peace Se ee aiid kt for Le ae. as Mowry hy 0 (eel?) Pin big Cron tn a por Corrs Jbpere (CL?) hig true re . t | Ck Pi teen Neal Easter aces Mit ane no Aas ROE; oe Le FALLS Fy Th be / | Jaan: Rae es alte. VOW fp S$ ie atrreyg ja Joi Th put Crushes. $ wd Jarfo S$ + FRE | Lng aor Ee V4 9 btedlid ay beatin is inne. Pe Fartety ed ots thn «fp an br priv t her prom e1ta7; wy t- bat, and hg wins LWP eo of lrinerdy she fr 2h har Lowe oS Vow fptan Ay Ha foreZ$ | hanaef fro — hang 6S Boor, Cok! har ete + ici ee co Cn By ok gx fee how ce C, ali Pada Gunn, | Srectece Gun , Lorin. Cent Goi, Sarna Depo ? Ce he in ge Chatenan be Min, ie ee a ee thee aby? Aner Bor DerrerricS, wid ise Ronthes avo oo 2 fhencetegs — Se 8 Le, Sie pene gn fey et a ple nrg oP ae dm tout$ pvt ba ng Poo Cartrwre 10-17 ae ae ete Lt a gets pe oo nny hens Auey W<A-7 CaS wet 2a z, | Main. Oh sin the CG eo 2 Mons e oq | bed furan Pik unecas: | cae eer pro plant ) berth og jit, Ad noflerrerr§ 4 ben LMinr—o ce nnielincitgat Mienctnts inser. me Attn di Res ttn sap Aang ada A lpn - AAt f hy GOD Adiaans saree OS Cy Sty ac ha P< otek, aa bite. in o_ Arravrer, aoe tfp— Povty atuhir nas Ww Co Pace “ 4 | oF a — a. Obwttnt- c. an li~ Lied tA idee GA, ‘ea hve (Ary oti ldrrn— f OT, » hog 2-fuat nS Jazeee 1 efactt hig uo POIAAN “p eines en eee Fo.» are Tas Luin@ ebb an AS Bie arune a an Ls Le Oh Gorse tpn CoN ne Se ai OH ghee 1 Yee AV? A p11 at sir kasi ao Cink ee ae ae Phi i, for os a : ie eto Piaie: 7 Seige ip ifn oon Kot e+ CP et tor nk A. fae s Tiasitnass phn VL CA 7 tt ct cgncaail S$ ogee woh elo a eee ‘ bo of a NF a remud rites otigl Be tpn ere VA; urtre ols oe | beg opt oo Crtot trieart oon f al al ta ohn Cr cemrre of Man +27 -7 2. pencputchihs ft oa sal Pt Mawes 7 mee a. Mart eeeks ee ee Fo. | | ete Meneass Mi. | gees HOA Dd ie Bs ae he , ned tA0rg Jreteeg + hh ett Ace Sire mrdtburnve /— } 5 Pe te. LN ene 0 a. ca aoe uit? ‘ ) 4 | Ao cra Ae Scie r Tre Fore ; | ,o Oo4rAAAS Oe Zp rn oe L7 x | At, Ft, 19-1 FES A GM hauler plz fra Reprod fren Cor, ba nin Aner tt, : AS, purttn, Jrribyy aueord POT Li ffe-etg a2 fori | : ee Vhs i (ofr ‘ } t i | | t owt en ' Vs eu 2 | | y MN Merry lay —we { S &6 l & NG S es 3 ers LN EOL LLL LIELP EAR LEAR A: fe PR tee PE AER eonbay Tee e Ns My ha frver ! ee eee Po. hes i 4 Coating ec SE a eet 5 Fi Fee MALL or | Ce day na et ee ae al y Oe i ng ee tee Pi : i hn WL & 3 yeres ‘siakg 9761 "SA 90f ‘sIohg SUMMONS FOR BELIEF—CIVIL CASES—Olerk—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. Cc. Iredell County—In the Supecior Coutt. AGAINST , SUMMONS Sarah Byers STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To the Sheriff of _Catabaw the defendant..--above named if-.shebe found within your County, to appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for the County of Iredell , on the-.18th ...day of -Maroh and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for ‘said County, on or before the return date of this summons, and let ML Sdckingnbomaebionmant take notice that if fail to answer to the said complaint within twenty days from said return date, the time preseribed by law, the plain- will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this..6th-day of --Me Byers, Joe vs. Byers, Sarah 1926 x SUMMONS FOR RELIEF ~ Returnable within Ne ny © office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of days into the € Tredell County. e 2 : f PSS, Recsived ae 7 » ‘yanoy sowedng yA9yo ' t ' i ' ! a $0 “< a =r ' ' ' t ' ’ ' ' ; ' ' ‘ ' j ' ' t ' ' t / ' ! ' ' ' ' i ' ' ' — Oo tb ' ' t ' SI} 9 alOjJog pPoqisosqns pueB 0} UIOMS lord puv sariyiqey ‘s}qep sty eaoqe pue 1940 ‘suOT}NOeXe WoIy Jdulexe Aj1a¢ Pe re re ere re en ny a erat nar ee SIB[JOP peapuny OA} JO UNS OY} YIAOM St oy SABS UIOMS (-ywag)------ Pe mee eet ee mT Ha eee eee eae ee ae £ep- ~~~ "sty “s] Bas pus spuvy ano SSOURT AM Toe eo “uoTpOR STyy ur~~ ~~~" gure g aq} JO JdvA0001 Agu~~~~juepuazod e} 8B 1800 “~------<—=——1UIBi qT OY} Jt “IaAomoy yons [[e-------~yuepuejeq ey} Avd [[eys----------~ ‘UOTJOR SIY} UI-“--JUBpPUEzeq 843 Ce ee one oe a Wns 8yy Ut ME es, ee ve Cee “Plog 9q 0} To aT ae tt a ot punog S8A[OSINO aspo|MOUyoR oM LSNIVOV “YNITOUYO HLUON AO ALYLS VS SG ere ‘34n07 1012adNg ay} Uj Atal prs EF. | Aint Cheap, atte ge, co SBazad = | nt BE wish th Sa ta Gee DA epprth_ ce er low va i cay Ce Meal, cee FB Kk en age Ae aus age, | eee GO 6, bam oe Che i AL aan tr wt Wh hae ase AE FS eS epee Fhe poe hippie Het oS Gee ree ee : Zi (AC JM Atec aT ak eS ext bb Cisliru ae SK a | ae £72 £ Lal ine Pecan Meera. ce uae Oe Lee ? < ee Lh Col. lc Ch LE Ae Ag CF. en es (fai ep pouty atten g 7 lee aes FL fe rcenal SAY ez ee Sa "his Cre Cy ae a me 2 6 ay, s 4 We Dee c ec. flea ec, O: . | Aang ip he Oh, FEI | tah C Kew St Pre axe | | a Ae e Yeh 46 4, Many, @ CB BOrchee,| “Zire & Ces, ne tg YOO ren Mets MlaG oe \Loce Keene € Ber Aare A, (Bor Cerin | > Lai Mele bhi. cc-m@ (he, pr as ful fix, fens ges | LZ t ghee € pedal ( Caufhor ‘ ra Atheoa_ se Haak aloe € XI i eM CA bh hws pee @ SoU fre N25. Cheek Fe ee | ‘Le MN te cme weet DN JAR py Clek Pacdo.g, Kee ceo Lew C Ake SK ae Ly bhorhic affrr i Deaf foot ier a Je OO ce oD atc PP a SS CF pec aBy 7 Ti. C BDeec The Exec rc: ; of fia tif cok Coffin ha cS ea af pol ~~ Deen b+risftz, Cr Bfudert a f . ae a ft ¢- @« i CE. 4 J ena ete i - AWE BLo ac ews A irae CIE FA tee pb CM da Na EK, CA bing ha a AL Se a A- Ang Pe Ae Be py Peet Cee Ae Ogn whe dh Ms te: cle peng tien ( eee 4 Ma Ste Sat. ns B . ; ; fe* C Aedes wet a Ale pa a lias CP fee € « «al | ‘ ‘aa Pir CFO flad. arn. aa 4 A | fla ¢ Bi fT per rm Kova heres o-rer | jm & SP « ghia Aha epi ‘ wa ( CA. Awe Lae. Tejueg ‘s10dg "SA eTITO “yu ‘sued fi ages 7 Qe — C¢ es rr ha x Poe ; 4 Den ee —_— Oe Bee ee. a hla es \Men a. py ae | ies ec. A Vas bun: ‘ fen, a | helene an. , oe ie Se i ie Ag Me ay SO cae i fan ere Let te As ge | ofte bh ag Ma Cle Aer. pyeeeN Lhe ae: A Cetin. VS a flu OG. Mn | Blin 4 ns Cl dedfee(< Ptenen. bhi x Ze, flea bf CLefier Le ue Coe pa ia a Cun here Ca AG. me, dee My Onn ~ Ahern S| 5, ee Chea CR es ai oe eo A. i Pe aD } ae. tx Sa hOGA L, Syste a4 Thee htt. > fhat fla. EK Aaa yi Ti. Abel. Paps albyeoure af ly Cl fltcec Oren. (Aired, ie Sais ao ae /tacfEX trynons hor Jey JA oul PN [te sue eting Chae AOG a Bul lh a Pk Keo Tie -bCE:. Pg GaP age > a Ay AOL 4 Che Oe } Mies € Fh. Chan 7 aC con Bee @t 3 C Wha ( th. Bf. here. Cc, eee cee Of Dome nek Cala C74 Shame iG ee Matas di Ael, ( 4s ) ferecelinn~, closes Sek form 6 G7 AEG ee Lao. ore ae. Ke Midge « NAGE Off hie Jto-tle fe p ee Oo terol 4 \ i 7. pia ha die welt. la. OO fia o-- c | KK | woe Og kh - Cerela | Cee re [or | Hs pe oe gocrce | 2. vc ve i : Lo ‘ Ja foe be Ofer eur COL | y . Cheep coe L, esagh aerm Mota Len fo Cte. Miss, es ee ce Sallie WS haa Ge Hed Me flan ti (rath) ete cz Tepued Ssr04g "SA STITON *u ‘s204g 3 2 Se ie a) Catan ge 7 pede A eu. C4 pears a ae th |ocectcceeen it of hs mote fo tk ae — RE x (ey fhe 7. C”A | Be Ze Kenn ee duak Afi Nate, eo. fa akulir, Coe Ton ‘mii Sho~G_ @ai+z aca 5 a lace Cf. C@en ae € | f % r k “) | | ' Dac. Cre oa. chtG@unt | Zep ee s fer Ch a. PE | bog bee ee ue FRG Jt fo Cae.lgggc t 2a Cinat~le bor. lo. A Se, Ee Pape fie, Cf com .CErer< j if: ty ? -C ame tithe» cc Sa Wy citele LM fie ect le, ae