Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Divorce Records 1855-1913 Aldridge-Bell
STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY This is to certify that the microphotographs appearing on this reel are true and accurate reproductions of the records listed on the target (title) sheet preceding each volume or series of records microfilmed hereon; that the records were microfilmed on the date and at the reduction ratio indicated; and that on the date of microfilming, the records were in the custody of the North Carolina State Archives. be | i (Signed) O0Cee/ Vig are. 2 Lh Camera pe / Genealogical Society of Utah (Signed) th Lica) ED Morice) State Archivist and Records Administrator } we vs 7 Date 23 Al Lé, 1 ABD? North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Division of Archives and History Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director ATTENTION This reel of microfilm may contain images of documents and records which are difficult to read or are illegible because of ink bleed through, acidic and brittle paper, torn pages, smeared or fading ink, water damage or other dark stains caused by prior improper storage. Quality may also vary due to differing conservation methods used; Barrow lamination may cause a fogged appearance and Mylar encapsulation may cause a glare. Every effort was made to produce the best possible copy from these original records. 4 Catherine J. Morris (deherinehfe Manes State Archivist and Records Administrator MAILING ADDRESS LOCATION 4614 Mail Service Center Telephone 919-733-3952 109 East Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4614 Fax Number 919-733-1354 Raleigh, North Carolina, | OPERATOR SOCIETY, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH NE TE WET STATE ARCHIVES REDUCTION X ey ba ae eee) Naa rw wAlik ~ FILM EMULSION NIU sista LIGHT METER a 64-8 FILM UNIT SER. NO. a | 2446016201201 MOD. £5481 | ! t i | PROJECT NUMBER ROLL NUMBER NAA yactl 066 ie y, MICROFILMED BY THE GENEALOGICAL LOCALITY OF RECORD 10a REDE TITLE OF RECORD U1) Cite CE ITEM 2 rev me ey. ga £ a o =a & CCOl ‘SAT “y ‘oBpupy SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed by Crowson Bros., Printers, Statesville, N. C. Iredell ____County.--In the Superior Court. __A.L, Aldridge _ acanst ~~. ~~~ _-« SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Upha Aldridge __ ar oC oem | State of North Carolina, | To the Sheriff Iredell __County--GREETING: You are Hereby Commanded to summon ee __UPHA ALDRIDGE the defendant. above named, if_..she be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of eens 3..-: at the Court House in ..... Statesville _______.on the..JAth_..__..Monday after the..__.lsat_____ Monday of the same being the 23rd ___day of Bh hetmas oc pniae .19_1.@, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant__take notice if____she fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff. will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this... 8th__day of//_-- a, 1910 / A \ CLE LAAMA4ELL phe Superior wert LAL CLL Cotnty. AGAINST ““guepuejeq oy} JUBPUITA(T 94} SB 4s00 o}UN puNog saAjesino aBpa,mouyoe 0 HHL oy} Jt ‘weaemoy S14} ‘s[ves pue spuey JNO sseUzIM SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Returnable to ---May ___| oi Term, 1910. SIY} OU aOJeq peqiiosqns pue 0} WIOMg jo Wins 84} UI ‘UOT}OR SITY} UT ‘Ayun0g LSNIVDYV | ‘YNIIONVD HLYON 4O ALVLS of the Superior Court of _Iredel1._County. PHUIe[T 943 Jo s9ao001 Low 5 fe ;79 Received (Z/ rh ld tera ee ae Ataclsisng As (AAAS Ln Mil; Awake! fA na ep” ‘yanog Joledng ey} uy ‘suoI}NDeXe WIJ JdWexe AjAzedoid pue sarjITIqQeI] ‘s}qep sIy aAoge pue JaA0 "U0130B SY} UI- L.C. Caldwell, Plaintiff’s Attorney. SiB[[Op perpuny OM} Jo Wins 9y4} YzA0M sI 9y SABS UIOMS ZuIEeq yons |[@-~ “Juepuejeq ey} Aed |yeys *Ploa oq 04 ‘sieijoq-~-~~ Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 > a = a. a # CS 3 = & C76I SA “] “y ‘oSpupry SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N.C. 3-15-13-1M. To the Sheriff of 4“ i Dou are hereby Commanded to suipmon ‘ M4 f the défendant ...above named, if ih be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of -ourt to be held for the County of..¢# ‘ee at the Lifeye, in Oe ee Ce’ on the a day after the - Monday of . r £ 7 5 ig’ the same beitig the MH... day of tor, and answer the complaint, a copy of which will. be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if MjRie..they fail to answer to the said complaint * within that time, the plaintiff....will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand atid seal of said Court, this LE day of Ig! f ” se Clerk of Supérior Court Ah LAY sty 20.1] GS, —_—. Crs oA wang? , DA Ne , JO yIn0d IOLIedNg aj Jo ¥ V\Ge oo v “AdUIOyNY SyyNaeyg 0} BIQeUIN}ay ~“Qd CF, SM n77V to ae ¢ — ) ' 2S ~—~y6r ae foe cS ‘AaTTaa 440i SNOWWNS > a. se o. 02 s cs 3 oo so) ‘SA "J “VW “OBpUplV J“) - ae CTO jo Aep” “sIY} SUI B10Jaq pequiosqns pue-o} nIOMG ‘suolynoexe wio1y ydutexa Ajsadoid pur sarjifiqety ‘s}qap sty aAoge puke 1340 SIe[]Op paspuny OM} jo UINSs 943 YOM st aq SA¥S TIOMS BuIeq* (189s) (1e9g) (eg) 161 ‘qd ‘v “yo Aep “SIy} ‘s[eas pue spuey ino ssanztM * *‘MOIjOR SI} Ur YUUle[g 24} JO 1aA0da1 Avur JUEPUjIq P1[} SB }SOO yons |e ~yuepuajaq 243 Aed [jeqs” is te ~"guareg 24} Ft ‘Taasmoy ‘pIOA aq 0} ‘sie[[0qG a oF “rermerseemeereeeeetQ TINS 94} Ut ‘MOT}OB SIq} Ut juepueajeg 34} “OJUN puNnog saajesino a8pa;mouyIe 9M LSNIVOV (-Ayunod ‘ynog Jowedng aq) a] es ("¥NITONVO HLYON JO IL¥LS + “ Civil Subpoema.—Printed and for sale don Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C: etait . 2M—s—,o4. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Se cleet County--GREETING: Won are hereby Commanded to gli aed. >> Qo. O. cos ne ao. O. go ge os Cc > = —s < “vA Defendent.... Witness | Tcussuny Clerk of our said Court, at office in Monday after the. Monday on C761 k Superior Court for. ronan eee ort preter ene enn Kebeods tet. Gad Ke hair oil. (f) CFL ror L476 5 Lea qr I. be Phe ae ae z APY >> a. A. =e a. o. ge 0g oo Cc > = fs < ~n C761 ~ Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, NC. , 5-15-'07-2M. —e STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF oF Dede lk County--GREETING: OU ABE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON es AL... pergonally to appear before the Judge of, Superior of at the next Court to be held for our said county at the Court House in. Akh ALL ete. Vows. e A tk: on we hustday iol ae inhale. Sad, L- next, then and there to testify and the truth’ to say in behalf Lie ina i, before Defendant... .. And this you'shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. } “ WITNESS, » / 3-4 an / br Court for. (ALS : a ™>. tl _. Plaintiff. ....Defendant........... - tc ne litte attests iowa P f iF a... Me od E At PPiate Lf aut ° Ye. hee . , : : ‘ 7 ih, faceer Cb ; ffx CLM, tat Ip Lihr teri cateletr, an aeetih tha MA: the they y Meet wena f re ee 47 4/ 4h fe O44 Jt > pelle fhellar& an fs C ¥ Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N.C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATEOF NORTH CAROLINA, | > a & a a go 7 a ee Cc > co =e: < wi " Glet, f or vse Loytt, at office i et nsesbusicdin Monday it Gore Monday Clerk Superior Court fo = 2 a ae ge 02 oo Cc > Sr Bt < ¥ ‘ C76 Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. : 2M—~5—-,04, 3 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF.. / County--GREETING: Plaintiff_., and Defendent 2 2 2. 2. = a a. & ge 0 i Cc} Ec gO < “A And this you shgll in no wixeomit, under the penalty prescribed by law. ne ss VV tt a.» Clerk of our said Court, at office in ele , VA MAAMAAANA Fo" ey. Monday after the. | re ..Monday in I} if CC6I perior Court for a & a. go 99 oo CP 3 > < na CTO 25*-1F16 Cobras 21% 9 at +, Civil Subpoena.—Printed sald for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. c. ‘ . STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF-.. Cadden, next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of... @4- in a certain controversy before.said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein Plaintiff... an Defendent Witness _, Clerk of our said Court, at office in Monday in lla Ste me a 6. 2 02 2a Cc > = oe < ~” C761 uperior Court for..... j ees har Against 2 >. a. o = a. o. 02 02 a & Cc > = go < ” C76! Civil sto soo ere and for sale by Ready; The Printer, Sraneerilie, N.C. , : M—s—0t_ 7 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Di 4 County--GREETING: Plaintiff... and Defender... And ibis y you shall in no wise @mit, under the penalty prescribed by law. Witness. ee LP AI RRR OR, sonnet Clerk of our said Court, at office in Monday after the / m a. 2. = ie ao. G2 de e # i = go < ~ Superior Court toe cna County. C76 Rae eat Ne i a Ea gS ONO ROO te Hct a a. a. se ao ge 02 oo Cc > z =: <€ ~” ‘g Mey. Ae | iG ye ene ? L Q ncoges: Ga t.| VOIALA a: (Artes Y A : filed IG ‘Orr 7 : Age - oe. =F a ag s C 3 5 CCOl SA “] “y ‘OBpuply “STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF eae County--GREETING; _ personally to appear before the Judge-of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county at the Court House i 47 / -M- &. A g/C next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of o Piatti in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherei Defendant..... _| And this you shall im m0 wise mit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, .....---22e00-nop Se f AMAA SN AS , Clerk of our said Court, at office SUBPOENA--Civil. Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 Bape: LPS fees Tha Sasa Jae oat mai PEs et a 2o, s ~ 2 ik Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 > ' North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. Octotrer Terp, 1915. Adam Aldridge, ) ) vs “” ) A 8°S WE RY ) ) Euphy Aldridge. The defendant, answerkgine the complaint of Plaintiff, alleres and says: First. That the allerations contained in pararraph number one are admitted. / / Seéond. That the allegations contained in paragraph number tro are untrue and sams are therefore denied.. Three. That the defendant has no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief concerning the allerations contained in = P a. 2 me ot ao. ge 0 a 3 cC> = go < nn paragraph number three, and same are therefore denied. Fourth. That the defendant alleres the truth to be that she CC6I has not had intercourse with the plaintiff for nearly nine ye rrs, for the reason that the plaintiff treated her in such a violent and abusive manner that she informed said plaintiff she would refuse to perform her marital duties in the future unless he treated her with more consideration, and in a wav consistent with the relations existing between them. Fifths.Answering the fifth paragraph, this defendant alleres the truth to be thst she did leave the pliintiff about the time alleged by him in his complaint, and her reasons for leaving himewere follows, to wit: that almost since the time this defendant and plaintiff were intermarried, the nlaintiff treated this defendant in. cruel. an inhuman rarner,avplying the vilest epithets :to her, and makine her life miserable by charging her with acts of infidelity with all most very man with whom she came into contact; without any srounds or > o. = ou a2 2 ~ 3 = = CCOI ‘SAT “Y “OBpUPTY Wherefore this defendant having fully answered the complaint of plaintiff, vrays the court that she be allowed to hence without day, and recover the cost of this action against the plaintiff. 44> we. Attorneys for Defers nt. Puphy Aliridge being sworn doth say that the facts set forth foreroing answer are true of her own knowledge and relief, the matters therein stated on information and telief, and 4s 1 Ut Mb Meee: Sworn and subscribed to before ise this the 7 day of February, . ‘ ve A 0 : >. :. - \ { . > YU. cr0r Suverior Court. to those she believes it to be true. - e a 02 Ms te 0 5 CCO6I ‘SA “J “y ‘o3pupry . Bill of Costs,—Civil.—Prirted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT County. Original] Summons, or other original process, including all names therein di $1 Every copy of same Bond, including Justification Appeal from Justices. Appeal from Clerk to Judge Order for enlarging time of pleading Interlocutory Orders Attachment, Order in Injunction Order, including Bond and and Justification Order of Arrest Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. .. ........cc0.cecsesese0s Continuance. Caveat to a Will, entering and docketing. Issuing Commission Notice, for each name over one in same paper. Impaneling Jury Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided Judgment final in term time NT celltsliiSiidisdeceledisvecaingstpsencdibandihe shieenbtegaimioll sua ” Summons Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal....... ... Transcript to Supreme Court County Tax, when Jury impaneled. CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS-CIVIL. —_—— if J ia seccefnceptnnbesndh whech arthads hel igl tere eannenedgthics tro duchepde kgeines lit tlh pe Aldridge/A. L. vs. Aldridg¢, Upha “ a. ok a: 09 hd CS 3 so & CCOl SA “T “Vy ‘oSpupry SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. ©. Ja.ecet_County—In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Garolina. 1 eS oe To the Sheriff of YOU ARE HEREBY COM the defendant... above named, ls tn found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the QGgunty of-- pp ActaLe LA ai the Coyyt House in wae een the. 4.9 the. haBMoniay of non the same being thatthe day of fs Sas <a : 191 Ge» and, amswer the.complaint, a eopy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk ofthe Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if. _-they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff..... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this.summons make due return. SIY @A0qe puv J2A0 BHU T OY} Jt ‘oAsemoy “SFO WINS Ot} UT “MOTOR Bryy UT ““““jurwpuazedy ay} SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Returnable we Mieccactg Torn, 1914__ or ot Ane Coounty. ~ of the Superiér Count “SI4} ‘S[¥98 PUY Spuvy Ino ssouyT Ay ~~ STY} OU B10Jaq Peqiaosqnus puy 0} TIOMYG ~""""oyUn punog seajosno eBpeymouyoe oy Aup--- VYNI'IONVS HLYON JO ALVLS saa ‘Ayunog--~- HVAT 9y) Jo zwaodver Avu ~""""“gUepuaze(y 917} sv js00 i aoe ‘suOT}NOeXe Woy Jduwexe ApIedoid PUB SeIjTTIqQeT] ‘siqep Sureq - “UOT}OB IY} UT ~m- ‘J4nOg sorsadng oyj uy us 7. £ = ° = é Lt > ® pee Dp = a = = S @ nn S 3 5 © A - = ° > =} s és a a a. => = Yous [[@ ~-~--~juppuezeq | eer agree on an ‘PIOA 8q 04 ‘sayijoq------ Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 | > | North Cerolins , Iredell County,In the *uperior Court, Jan. ferm,1917 Euphia Aaldrédge, VS. adam aldridge, To the Hon.Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County ££. certify that we have examined the case of the vlsinti in the above entitled action,and believe thet she has a~good and meritorious cause of action in fact tive suretie@,or he ebove action + she mey be = 2 . me a. & ge 92 ” Cc > = o ie ~”n CCOl e: a. <5 a ge - te 3 s poe) CCOl ‘SA “"T "WV “OSpUPTY ms : { SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N, C. County—In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant.. above named, he found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Saperior Court, ata Court to be held for pe fons’ of at the Court House in on the. $> Monday r Va cardanemss hemes of mone ic hae aii ; __.. 191, and»answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superi#® Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant....-take notice if they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff..... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Jhad, Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this > Zaabay of Clerk of Superior Court- 2.2L eo £4 County. 8P SITY eA0qe pu 1dA0 BVA Oy Zt ‘ToAomoy Jo UMS 943 UT “MOTOR sryy UT ~““““guEptazaq oy} OFAN PUNO SIA[esINO OBpe|mouyoE 04 a ee a ~~ SIU} OU e10Jeq Peqiiosqus pue 0} a10OMg Ree fh 1 “Jo ABp----~--~s1yy “syres paw Spuvy Ino ssouzT Ay YNIIOMVS HLYON JO FLVLS np ao ‘suorjnoexe woly yduiexe Ayzodoad pue SOTBTTIQUI]T ‘sq “UOKo8 S14} Ul ~--~-"_uUTel_y 943 Jo aeao0er Aum “TTS "“gUBPUszOCT 9173 SY 4s00 "p4n0g snasadng oy} uz ar ) *8) (-qeog)-- (189g) (*yeeRy)------- ' ' i ' ' ' i ' ' ' ' ‘ ' ' ' ' i ' ' ' ' { ' ' ' ' ' ' ’ ' i i i ' ' r = R Q = = 3 = “< a = ® me = = 2 = - @ ze = 5 © —s = = = > a. ed ® => => = . ‘POA OG OF a arta serena t tere oe Tee yous [[@ ~~~“~-~quepuezeq] oy} Avd qeys-----~------- Plaintiff’s » Athoraey. Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 a = a gg Ss & 2 5 C76 ‘SA "Ty “OSpupry North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County ; January Term,1917. Adam Aldridge, Plaintiff wo VS an Euphy Aldridge, Defendant. The defendant answers the Complaint and for. answer gays: ~-First~- : That the allegations contained in the first paragraph of the Complaint are not denied. --Second--~ That the allegations contained in the second paragraph of the Complaint are not true and are denied. ~-Third~-- : That the allegations contained in the third paragraph of the Complaint are not denied. ~-Pourth-~ That the allegations contained in the fourth paragraph of the Complaint are not true and are denied. The truth being that while the defendant was not guilty of the acts alleged in the second paragraph of the Complaint, she alleges that since said date, that the plaintiff has lived with her ; and if she had been unfaithful to him as alleged, which she again denies, that the plaintiff condoned the offense repeated- ly, has lived with the defendant as husband and wife, and had had that intercourse with each other as is proper for per- sons joined in wed-lock,. --Pifth-~- That the allegations contained in the fifth paragraph of the Complaint are not true and are denied. And for a further answer and defense to the Plaintiff's cause of action the defendant says: That since the act or acts alleged against her in the second paragraph of the plain- tiff's Complaint, and which are above denied, and herein again denied, that the plaintiff has lived with her in the same house as husband to her, has occupied the same bed with her and has been a husband to her, in acts of sexual intercourse. And for a further answer and defense, she says, that she has never deserted or abandoned the plaintiff, but because of his cruel and inhuman accusations against her, and his treatment of her, has been such, that at times thet her life was intolerable because of such cruel treatment and accusations, that she has on one or two accasions denied him privileges which he sought. expressly telling him, that whenever he had the proper confi- dence in her, and ceased his cruel treatment of her and accusa- f a. ao ge 02 os Cc > 3 st a tions of her, that then she would submit to his embraces at C761 such times and places as would be acceptable to him and herself. And further answering says, that because of his want of proper provisbon for herself and her children that she has been compelled to so elsewhere and work in order to obtain the proper sustenance to sustain life and to clothe herself and her children, and here alleges that at the filing of this answer and for months frior hereto that she and the plaintiff have lived in the same house together, beded and cohabited to@gether, ~ and heving further answered she asks that she recover her cost in this case expended, together with such alimony, to paid under the orders of the Court as will be sufficient in her station in life, and that of her children to provide sustenance and clothing for them. And the defendant further pmys that the Court will order the plaintiff to pay into Court a reasonable sum to be adjudged by the Court as compensation to enable her to employ counsel to defend her in this action, am she is not able because of the eydy ‘e3puply SA “] “Y ‘ospuply CHI expenditures for herself and her children, out of what she has been able to make herself have deprived her of the nec~ essary money to enable her to prosecute this defense to a Cal Srercce « Cal d< ele ounse or endant. Buphy Aldridge, being duly sworn, says, that she is the final success. defendant in the foregoing action; that she has read the fore- going Answer and that every part thereof is true to the best of her knowledge and belief, except as to those matters and things stated therein upon information and belief, and as to those she believes it to be true. Jin oe Cliwaahbhihe ( Ff Ay Sworn to and subscribed this the dy day of --f*=------ f : i Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-'07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF County--GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON Defendant........__ And this you shall im-no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, a ee nnnnnnonen eccseesceessnnessneeey Clerk of our said Court, at office = > & = a & go ge S$ a> co oh < 1a CTO “af a. =. a gg 5 = 3 5 C76 ‘SA "] “y “oBpupyy No. 102. Subpoena—@ee.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 10-28-’11-2M. COUNTY —In the Superior Court, The State of Worth Carolina, To the Sheriff of COA -72409 County—Greeting: ~ Cyn om, to summon : “ee ; (if to be found i ur coynty), personally to be and appear before his Honor, Judge of our Superior Court for the County of to be held in the Court House in Vhefes vt Lp r the... vr abet G toe is plaintiff and a sasat tina sc onit I E on the part of the Herein fail not at your peril. Given under my hand this == SUBPOENA ee VW Atel La es <_ ee eydy ‘aspupry SA "J "Y ‘oSpuply CCOl on part of the State vs, : = 2 ~» 3 3 3 = & © 3 s > > > i = You are To the Clerk of i a =F a ge £ Cc 3 =¥ ous C761 ‘SA “T “y “O8pupry North Carolina, Tredell County. | In The Superiar Court, October Term, 1917. Buphy Aldridge Adam Aldridge. In this case the court having called the plaintiff and the plaintiff failed to appear and ansser, directed that a non- suit be entered, and it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the defeniant fo without day as upon a judement of non- suit, and the plaintiff to pay the costs of her action. Judge Presiding. - > Qa. take tate a & go 99 e 9 > SY BS < ¥ CCOl STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF IREDELL OCTOBER TERM, I9I7. A. Le Aldridge -Vs- JUDGMENT. Buphy Aldridge This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before His Honor BE. 3. Cline, Judge Presiding, and the plaintiff, through his counsel, D. L. Raymer, making known to the Court that he did not desire to prosecute his action further, but desired to take a voluntary non-suit, . “It is therefore, upon motion of Caldwell & Caldwell, counsel for the defendant, adjudged and ordered that a voluntary non- suit be taken by the plaintiff, and the costs of the action. to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court and paid by the plaintiff. POC dam ~ fe meen eee en Judge Presiding. ' ! z Be Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 3 Gnd) hak we Rat a ma M90 inahiad a. ce a 2 We Pe Dame rae an 2 See Wr. AQAA yo go. 7 $08 ger 57 dye weboel brunfhs L—— ho. oo at J FEES. sche ria 12 - & me a Ge s CC 3 7 > ‘SA “T “VY “o3puply CC6l >. a. <3 a ga # Cc 3 =% = COI ‘SAT "Vy “OSpUPTY CIVIL SUBPOENA—Printed and for sale’ by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, North Carolina. er OF NORTH CAROLINA Yy OMMANDED ’ f “. personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next . Court to be held for our a county at the Court House in Statesville, North Carolina, on the- Jf Ft of Li Wi at sc Sead 1 190.2 then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of he i alee A a > > Qa oO ie: it a. go ge £9 > = eo < ~” CC6l sen e « unty. e Q. =. ou gg a 7 co es & COI ‘SA “TY ‘oSpuply personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, * the next Court to. be held for our said county at the Court House in Statesville, North Carolina, on the_/! P_ -day of there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein , kt Jae Cee e <2<=?, Clerk of our said Court, at office in Statesville, N. C,, > Qa. o. le. os oe oe 2 9 = > ee & < ~” CCOl erk Superior Court for Iredell County. Term, 192__ Or) > /dar Ar—-1 > 1922 y 2 a. 2 Se ao ge ge a2 om Cc > = =" < ~” CCOl BIPTIVIV LIUN STF FO -WOTSTATD SU} UT} VUw "'s*SON SPOT Zuyeq puw swe, ze axons exow-¥/T=2 BATA TMUVS* MipUAyIEq OYF OF SOTO OMEN SOUKTy EPUET : | Dis peepee ot Dee —eaptap ty £20 BUT JO WOYSTATO VG UY T# GOT FO AOUISO WIOFs “oy wetor | See ee Maes “Se Ter WOUKLTTOUTT VLUTOTTIA UO STA 8 OF SOTO BNE S SouSTy epaNT “-~ Jo spuvl ey} Surujofpe ---"Ul PUB] JO [e01"d JO 3981} UTe}100 . ee eee ) g& OP SyuaseAd esay) Aq puL ‘pjos pus pauteBzeq ~~~ ~~ yey ‘PeSpa|mouyow Aqazoy s} Yoryss Jo es ce eines enw oo £q pred nnneennsericreer et eter fe PRR ea oS he Us ~~ JO UoHeAepisuos ul steeweus statiameeeen== s+ nas seanse Senn acento s<°<"* Eee ETy PIM 4] MPPOOe A wwe ome wee et eee een non 70 07898 pay AuneD ‘RUNOIRG) Yproyy Ju aTRIg Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 com 5357 JO WIRD. 043 qSurTese oulEs 94} 03 2/34) ples oy} puejep pue JUBLIBM [LM wg yey} pus *‘go0UBIQUINIU! []B Ws01Z IBO/D PUB O15 tajdulis-eej UL cues on Keauoo 0} 14ZU-~-g~ By pus ‘eoz Ul sest wield pres Jo pozjes” “By” BIeVy) ‘sudjsse puv pres q3uas SBPTIVIV LIV SUT FO UOySTATD WIP UT Hy vaY s *g°SON SPOT Zuyeq puw swe, 10 exert waxow-¥/T=2 MUTA THUTS’ MrpuayIeq OYy OF SOTOL OF" MLE N Sousgy epueT aus & pewte —SSpTIPTY LIM SUT JO WOTSTATO WF UT TH SOT FO LHUIOO WOT OF — ESE: "SFT eT VOUT TOUT T S,WTSUT TA UO Bk Td Bled eae YS vousyy SpayT ————. —-->----=>-- 3 ee a = A 40} Spoeq }0 103s130y 243,U9 ‘uoREsysLHer J0F POT oe ‘a 7 ced eared pemnennaes ae Aep siyy ‘Tees [eloyo pus pusY Aw sseuz1 -pezeysiSer oq ‘seqBoyTyse0 O43 Ya JuoUINIySUT OY} JOT “ABT 0} Buypaosoe pue wi03 enp uy oq 04 peSpnfpe s} JO eyBoyRAed Bujo#e10j OY, pee IAP ey ce eee ‘VNITIOUVO HLUON sso TISL7a tv * 5 Gs porezsidel oq ‘e7BOYT}109 Sty} GTA ‘oues 043 3°] "0701043 S80Uz{M Bulquosqns oy} Sasnsengnagee ometsO8 Perec ae +-*-Jo uoTjsuTMIEXe PUB 4}EO 9} kq ‘ou eroyoq ueaocad Avp sty} sea quoumns3sul BuyoFe10j oy} JO uUoFNIexe OL : *“KINNOO “VNIIOUVO HLYON puwy fui s80u71M ery ‘pessoidxe 7 oy ou e10jeq peSpojmouros Aup sy} seas quoumnsysuy BujoZe10j eyy JO UOPNIEXe OL cowencomngs seeker 3 ‘YNITIOUVO HLUON bk 24% —"" 16E sty} ‘[ees TePyO pus puwy AuI ssoU31 MA -pedeyeiZer oq ‘9}8OY17100 S14} YI ‘ours OF} qe] ‘ojesey) quesse AprequNIoA [1198 4IOP O4s 4843 pus ‘uosied 20430 Aus Jo “pueqeny pres 404 70 uorst~ndw0o 10 qeez yNoyMA fApreQuNjoa pus A]ser} oures au} pouSis ays 3y) 6787s GROW ‘oures O43 Jo UOYNOEXe Axequnjoa 204 Buyqono; ‘pueqsny pres Jey woz qavde pus oqeiedes ‘pouruexe ee “--= pres ey} puw ‘eousfeauoy jo peed pexeuue ay} JO UOTyNOSxe ENP 94} peSpe;mouxyoe pus ‘Kep sty} oul e10zeq pervedde Ajeuosied ‘oxi sty : $9, OSES. FEE P TTT BE ESE EE EEE Wiessse hqeteg 0p I - > we % YNITOUVO HLYON Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 ww oa a we we we a Se + ee ee eee eee ~—<—<—< it? + spn EE ogg uo ‘speep yo yoog ut “n ¢o ~* £4909 ,0°--~- 9B" TET SIG} “OD “N “Aqun0D © JO} speeq JO JeysiZey ey} JO 9d1JJO ey} Ul petejsiBe1 pue~~-~~-~-yo0]0,0 - 10J Spoog JO 103813ey 40J Pepa process, including all ; . » .§ T.0off---- - ee a. =e ao g2 03 S$ ot = ay a ~”n | Docketing ¢z parte Proceedings Judgment “ Summons C761 I CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL. (Aa Fixed by the Code.) Term, 191... Aldridge, A. L. vs. Aldridge, Upha 1922 ~ 4 2 Aan cheat Saloreerye Lelare. 3 Vhale rim Ke Thovel, /§18> Giz Axfaen / 4 thou fare Rie Kaisa bgg ferred [tdiyronr fir fin Hectatlh. agetig eee? OK, a asad Jo par “ey pd aN wr oa ars yee Dy FN posdaeo 6 Fr paw ds Spacsshol Bests eas Ziel TA Yprorenen oe mn . ) AR . cm my Mer »s) Lo ten mA . SY? cas S N S yaw » poe praddc = » Dy ~ : raat AON \ as sy \ sen LYTsS, 43 “\ _ Vers2d pabday a o> vw» +B a) \ ax\ - “aah «+ S-o8 rv) awry \ * fam Yaoekh YO eaDD\ 1233 ' , Ce a ATA 2 22d 3 Vhs os yo * & yon — s > - 2 > »>>% . | i aa ie 2 a: ie JS Diet re on a ¢ : ute etiighes hy Tha pk, tap lacie eee FET ee pad PP Ze : Kod elineecdeut Leb PM acth Bo irbvig fAor 9 ee Meee | | my ‘iis ; ey c | diary f jor Vi Ay ¥ ? ' Cueel ye A Nhe La i © Se eine aia p ) ) ae thy |b Oba, off / WS | . = Las 7 AU he mittee ° | PYAIOLC vs. Alexander, L. Etta | matted (Yoh - Ae. Lg ‘Letve h meth J a a ne ee ee ee ee a eC ee ee 2X1 - Lhe. Gy af br Qeblix Ke l Lola eT ae ci, DL 1-firse 1 Fan senile diated ecg: be~ a ae 39 2 aier_et LK Jut/—- Secu Lef | Lui flawtlG, Wh Fa Ae . ao 4 ahllig LUctA 722t p— Jicacacd | nu tl CaceneG~ A) G<., th 2; mn tiga /— lac Off td at, tad pacts pane Ketan: [isence rei , tL \ — SA Bane] ‘tepuexe Ty WETTTTM *tepuexeTy elie Dk Lliiilgy dig tron 249 Bar| iy fac’ Zt arth 1 Wy 7 a 4 ane, fo 4 Cte % & Affierle/2 tll | y “9 see A Miaf couS Meat Zac J Conn —j fp lece— co stat? rahi secH CreZ- | Or G 9 (2 gb aon . een tap yor Lr mena | hein, [rd aD afer ) a ether Lat ty 26vrtirG acd Cech rr Ltn C Ae eeg 22tecc tng SH ftez CL, CF en woe ~ a , Fy ofl . aga t aa a A 4 1r . Yew x . Cgn hecuhsh <i dite . f & ‘ | AMAL; AG Z- ry i 2" SA ER Mike, CEL ‘ z@pUeXeTY “SA einey WETTTTM *tepuexeTy wate ee oy oT Z : BGK yn Go Yocrntn. 190% by Elta Rebeteas Wel of Ze &Mm8.% De : — WetTTTM puexeTy °SA eine] ‘sepuexeTy Alexander, Laura vs. Alexander, William | cel Lh Ce and ee Ce panne are liga Hihceld a: athige/ ee tim Kans aie Tires ~ . a _ ¥* WETTTTM ‘tepuexeTy "SA Bane] ‘epuexeTy — } > * e 3 o@ ~ = » we v foo 5 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. _Jreae.._ Gauniy.--' In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of... Irede11 County—-GREETING : Wou are Hereby Commanded to summon.......Maggde. Allison >> ay 6 6 PP <> tS) § Oo < “ O16! be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County aot _...kredeld at the Court House in efore Statesville, N.Ceon the Sth Monday 2S the... 18% Monday of : _rghO, and answer the complaint, a copy of the defendant....above named, if..8he the same being the _.18%t._ day of August which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if..82@..they fail to answer to the said’ complaint within that time, the plaintiff........will apply to tae Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this...27%0. day of. “AL iy, i ts " , , Clerk of ie Court... Predeld County. 191.0. f 7 “ROS TOUSTN F UETSns io eHIN}2yY ' a ‘Ayun0y” = TSpoayt 7 yanod sopiedng 243 jo 4 ULL ei OF stow YIM Say Surpesge La “ey FITV Stes “PSs yo} 19 ~HOSELTV: T20GTV SEALS Stitip™ padteooy LSNIVOV ““ETSpezy™” FHIS *% og ee io i --E "AsU10}}Y SBA] = ‘431130 80d SNO SUMS WET aS y “oT 61 ‘m9 >> 66 B 5 = > & ae oO < “ O16! jo dep" “StY} @UL BIOJ9q Pequosqns pu 0} WIOMG "suoTjNdexs mors ydutexe Ayradoid pue sanyiqet ‘siqap sty aAoge pue 19A0 S1¥]]Op PeIpuUNny OM} JO uiNs 94} 4II0M St 9G ShvS BIOMS SuIIq (‘1eg) ~~ (‘Te9g) © yo Aep SI} ‘s[eas pue spuvYy INO sso "MOTB Sq} Ur Yiyurelg 24) Jo 9A00e1 Apu JUBPUajag et} SB 3S09 yons [[eo oo qaepuezeg oy) Aed jyeqs” PUUpeLg ey} gt ‘“taAaMoy ‘pIOA aq 03 ‘srB][Oq™ t rover “JO TIns oy) af ‘UOI;OB SIq} UI" JaEpuayaq eyt OJIN puNnog saalasiINo aBp2| MOU AV 34 ” LSNIVOV f ‘Ayunod ‘no? 10uIedNg aq} UT 4 | ‘WNITIONVO HLYON JO FL¥LS - ze FP Kk & 5, a Ol6] ‘SA WOQTY “WOSHITY Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. ‘ 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF... SA County--GREETING: vp ARE HEBEBY ee j AMAL. ALA all. personally to appear before the Jdge of Superior Court, at the next Court. to be held for our said county at on the next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of Court depending, and then and there tp Planta ......Defendant.......... Allison, Albert vs. Allison, Maggie 1910 ~ = ° P = & ge . a O16! ‘SA UOQTY ‘WostTy North Carolina # In the Superior Court, Iredell County # August Term 1910, Albert Allison, plaintiff, # vs, # Complaint, Maggie Allison, Defendant. ¥ *) | The plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, alleges: First:- That the plaintiff and the defendant intermarried on or about the day of 1896, and ever since said time have been and now are husband and wife, Second:— That the defendant committed adultery with Dave Woods, about the year 1908; that the plaintiff did not live with the defendant as ashe and wife after the plaintiff had knowledge of the fact of her adultery; that the plaintiff has had knowledge of the fact that the plaintiff committed adultery with the said Dave Woods more than six months next preceeding the filing of this complaint, Third:— That there has been no issue of said marriage, Fourth:— That the plaintiff has been a bona fide resident of the State of North Carolina for two years prior ‘to the in- stitution of this action, | Wherefore, the plaintiff demands judgment that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and defendant be dissolved and that the plaintiff be divorced from the defend- ant a vinculo matrimonii, and that he have such other and fur— ther relief as in law and equity ne. action, Albert Allison, being sworn says that the facts set forth in the complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between husband and wife, nor for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in ' o£ . a z r = es, = O16! ‘SA UOqTY ‘WosITy Sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the COMP TRANET | that the facts set forth in the complaint, as grounds for di- yorce, have existed to his knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of this complaint; and that the plaintiff has bem a resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceding the filing of the ee hl d —. Sworn to and subscribed before me, this tha 27th day of June 1910, Clork Superior Court, SUPERIOR COURT--SUMMONS In Accordance With Chapter 66 Public Laws 1927 IREDELL COUNTY—In the Superior Court. Syed “A ‘Uoslopuy "SA “TT SIPIOD ‘UOsIOpuy 6261 \ Cordie Lee Anderson AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF W. Parks Anderson THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Iredell County—GREETING : To THE SHERIFF OF You are Heresy ComMANDED T0 SUMMONS. W, Parks Anderson the defendant... above named, | cena 8 be found within your County, to be and appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court, for the County of Iredell;-at the Court House in Statesville, not later than THIRTY DAYS from date of service of this summons, and answer the complaint, a copy of which is hereto at- n the office of Clerk of Superior Court of Iredell County within the time as set out in the attached order) and let the said defendant... take notice that if...@.......fail to answer the said com- will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the tached, (or which will be filed i plaint within the time required by law, the plaintiff. complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due return. December 1922 Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this LOBh..day of Sohaude Vi ttpatlsas Clerk Superior Court, Iredell County. By SHIed “A\ Uosispuy ‘SA “T SIPIOD ‘uosiapuy 6C61 edusys “M Lf TLepedi Uuosdepuy syieg pus 656 Joey 10y suowumng Lun00 MOMaAdAS TIACAI TIepetT UUM punoy eq 04 qou sft quspuejep eyq ‘fupnbuy 6Z6l *°UIPT Aoqueced styL T + BEL UAH LSqursveg ~. Pearsooy = Mm We, and each of us,/acknowledge ourselves bound unto the Defendant... herein named in this action in the sum of two hundred dollars, to be void, however, if the within named Plaintiff._jshall pay the defendant... all such costs as the Defendant.... may recover of the Plaintiff..in this action. Witness our hand........ and seal... this the - day of 19 (Sea) (SEax) (Srar.) maketh oath that he is a resident of County, North Carolina, and worth TWO HUNDRED dollars over and above all his liabilities and legal exemptions allowed by law. Sworn to and subseribed before me thris.cncceccvcccecceennene day of Hp Clerk Superior Court. Syed ‘A ‘Uosispuy ‘SA “J SIpIoD ‘UuosIopuy 6761 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Tredell County. Ngo Cordie Lee Anderson ) -VS- 0 COMPLAINT W. Parks Anderson The plaintiff complaining of the defendant for cause of action, alleges and says: 1st. That the plaintiff is, and has been for more than two consective years prior to the beginning of this action a bona fide resident and citizen of Iredell County and State of North Carolina, | end. That the plaintiff was married to the defendant on the 24th day of September, 1923, in the County of Iredell, State of North Carolina, which marriage relation has existed since that date and that they are now husband and wife, Srd, That on or about the 22nd day of March, 1929, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff without any cause or fault on the part of this plaintiff and that they have lived separate and apart since said date and that the plaintiff has not received the defendant in conjugal embraces since they were separated as above set forth, 4th. That on or about the _.. day of January, 1929, the said defendant committed adultry with one, Sarah Summers and with divers other persons at various other times. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff prays judgment ageinst the defendant, W. Parks Anderson, for an absolute divorce and dissolution | of the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the said plaintiff and the said defendant, and for such other and further relief as may just and proper. ard ) fei torney for plaintif@? Syed “M\ ‘Uosispuy ‘SA "J SIPIOD ‘Uosiapuy 6¢61 North Carolina, Iredell County. 5 Cordie Lee Anderson, after being duly sworn, says; that she has read the foregoing complaint and that the facts set forth in same are true to the best of her knowledge end belief; that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself and Gatbcca ccs not for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in sincerity and truth and for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint as grounds for divorce have existed to her knowledge at least six months prior to the filing of the complaint; that the plaintiff has been a resident and citizen of the state of North Carolina for more than two years next preceding the filing of the complaint. ——— Sworn to and subscribed before me, this the 10th day of December, 1929, falasch. Tykallaud ner Superior Court S¥ieq “M ‘Uoslopuy ‘SA “'] SIPIOD ‘uossapuy 6c6I oe aa I NRE ON my North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Cordie Lee Anderson -VS- 0 Ack FE: Tbh. VT W. Parks Anderson Cordie Lee Anderson, plaintiff in the above entitled action makes oath that she has a good cause of action against the defendant, W. Parks Anderson, for an absolute on the grounds of fornification and adultry; that the defendant, W. Parks Anderson after due diligence and inquiry on the part of the Sheriff of Iredell County cannot be found within the county or the state of North Carolina; that he was a resident of the state but has departed there- from; that summons in this action was duly issued on the 10th day of December, 1929, by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County and returned by the Sheriff of said county, "after due diligence and inquiry the defendant is not to be Sworn to and subscribed before me, this t Vy December, 1929, CLL LbhAlh tt i, found within Iredell County." uperipr Court Syed “\\ ‘Wosiopuy ‘SA "J SIPIOD ‘UosIopuy 6761 North Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Cordie Lee Anderson -VS- 0 ORDER OF PUBLICATION W. Parks Anderson It appearing from the sworn affidavit of Cordie Lee Anderson, plaintiff in this action, that plaintiff has a good cause of action against the defendant for an absolute divorce and that the defendant after due diligence and inquiry cannot be found within Iredell County or in the state of North Carolina; it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff sues for absolute divorce from said defendant on the grounds of fornification and adultry and that this is one of the cases of which service of \gummons may be made by publication as provided _ by Section 484 of the Consolidated Statutes of 1919 of North Carolina with amendments thereto for publication in divorce suits. It is therefore ordered, adjudged’ and decreed by the Court that summons be served on W. Parks Anderson by publication, and to that end notice of this action be published once a week for four conBecutive weels in the Statesville Daily, & newspaper published in Iredell County, setting forth the title of this action, the purpose of the same and requiring the said defendant to appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County in the Court House in Statesville, N. C., on the 15th day of Juanuary, 19350, and answer or demur to the complaint which is now on file in the office of said Court within the time required by law, or the plaintiff will apply for the relief demanded in the complaint. This the 14th day of December, 1929, C ) ay gk A / i] / AL A LULL ALLAN / F /Clerk Superior Court Syed “A ‘Uosiapuy ‘SA "J SIPJOD ‘uosiopuy 6261 North, Carolina, In the Superior Court, Iredell County. Cordie Lee Anderson } -VS- Q NOTICE OF SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION W. Parks Anderson 0 The defendant, W. Parks Anderson, will take notice that an action entitled as above, has been commenced in the Superior Court of Iredell County, North Carolina for an absolute divorce; that said defendant will further take otice that he is required to appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of said county in the Court house in Statesville, North Carolina, on the 15th day of January, 1930, and answer or demur to the complaint now on file in said court in said action within the time required by law, or the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. This the 14th day of December, 1929 ¢ fe Lua LLLSALAN SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. ©. Sch County—In the Superior Court. “SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Garolina. To the Sheriff of Aigdece 9 “a 5-5 a4 — oo 5s Ss ® oe tT es pw” Z Li6l the defendant... above named, if¢%<_be found within your Coynty, to be and appear before the Judge of at & Court to be }pld for the,County of_- at the Court House in the /L__¥ onday after the..Z. «c~~Monday. of the same being ing Fe of _..2 fete... -.--..191..4., and answer the eomplaint, a eopy of which will be deposited in the oftice of the Clerk of the Superior er ogg said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due. return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this /_»* Eaay a Clerk of Superior Court. .°“-e=-e&4 BUUTeLY Oy} FT ‘T0AdMoY ‘s}qop Sty eAoqe puB J2A0 JO Wins ot} UT “doTjoR BIy} UT ~*--;UBptezecT on} 4 “Jo ABp-----~--s1y} ‘Svs PUY spuYy ano sseuyT AY oyUN PUNOG SXATEsINO BSpe|MOUyOe oy ~"“SIY} OUl a40Feq peqiiosqns pue 04 WI0Mg VYNI'IOMNVIO HLYON JO ALVLS “fiyunop----- HO as Sad hee eee eae ae tae ae E =, s. 2 zB o S = so 3 = 2 = a << ® * ® 5 S - 2 B @® x ® @ > 5 . z “UOTjow SIG UT ~--~""BHUyeL oy} Jo 2vaover Avur ~-~---yuwpuezocy oy} sv 4800 "p4nog sorsadng oy) uy GE. | Sa a ee agony rue os ae ate tPA | Mita i: of oor eewe Na Sheriff. f<++<<<_ County SIB[jop Peipuny Om} Jo wns 94} 40M st oy SXUs UJOMS Zuleq ~------------------------------------- qons [8 ~“"""“guepuszeq) oy} Aed jjeys-~-~--------- “PEO OG OY RR rt en Ht rn tt ee i is Plaintiff’s Attorney. Armstrong, James vs. Armstrong, Emma 1917 e 3 4 a © =] * tr : LI6l ‘SA Sowers “SuonsuTy North Carolina In the Supgrior Iredell County May Term, 1917. James Armstrong vs . COMPLAINT. Emma Armstrong The plaintiff complaining of the defendant alleges and says; : ist. That the pleintiff samixthextefemtent is a res-— ident of the State of North Carolina and has been such resident all his life. 2d. That the plaintiff and the defendant were married about the 2s" rey °flssasy 191Z,and said parties lived together as man an@ wife up until the time hereinazter set out. 3a. Theat on or about the __ day of Mey 191, the plaintiff committed adultery with one Purvey Houpe and with other parties to this defendant unknown. 4th. That upon learning of this violation of the marriage vows upon the part of the defendant, the plaintiff left said defendant and since that time has not lived with her. akux Whkreupon the plaintiff prays thet the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved by a decree of this court and that the plaintiff be granted a divorce a vinculo, North Carolina Iredell County. James Arstrong beiny duly @worn, deposes and says; Thet the facts set forth in the foregoing complaint are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; that said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between the plaintiff e 5 a 5 © S e tr : LI6! "SA Souler “SuoNsuLTy and defendant; that said complsint is not made for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from the defendant, but in sincerity and in truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in the complaint have existed to the knowledge of the plaintiff for more than six months prior to the filing of this complaint, and that the plaintiff has been @ resident of the State of North Carolina for two years next preceding the filing of this compalint. ae Sworn to and subseribed to before me this the 25 __ tifaa W4 £ 1917. get - Clerk b }- Gre he Court. e 3 8 6 3 & tr : LI61 ‘SA Sower “SuoNsuLTy North Carolina, ) In the Superior Court. Iredell County.) James Armstrong, ) ) -vs- ) ‘ ) Emma Armstrong. ) c = being duly sworn / deposes and/gays, that in the above entitled action now pend= ing in the superior Vourt of Iredell County, the Sheriff of said County has returned the summons issued to him in said action endorsed "Search and inquiry made and defendant not to be found in Iredell Younty"; that the defendant therein cannot after due diligence be found within the State; that said de- fendant is a proper party to said action, same being brought to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the varties to this action: Wherefore, the said plaintiff prays that an order may be made by the Court that service of said summons be made on defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County, North Carolina. of March, 1917. ibscribed before me, of March, 1917, s Wann ; Lt Slerk stpertor cs ft Iredell County. Armstrong, James vs. Armstrong, Emma 1917 North Carolina,) . In the Superior Court. Iredell County.) James ANRRATONEY pe ) OR D BR OF PUB ETrGQat tas. ) ) Emma Armstrong. It appearins from the sffidavit of Py fa oe ae in this action that Emma Armstrong, ¢ t the defendant therein, cannot be found in Iredell County and cannot after due diligence be found in the State, and it further appearing that the said action is broucht to dissolve the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and de- fendant: It is therefore ordered that notice of this order ee Zo 66 & mn - o a for once a week for four weeks in the Statesville LI61 imark, & newSpaver published in Iredell vounty, setting forth the title of the action, the purpose of the same and requiring the defendant to appear at the next term of the ‘ Superior Court of Iredell County to be held on the 11th Monday first Monday in March, 1917, the same being the 21st Way, 1917, at the Court House in Statesvi > in said 4 answer or demur to the complaint of the Dlaintiff or therein demanded will be cranted. K This the 7¢ day of March, 1917, Rtas , ArH eras me Ne erk of the Suverior courte c ‘smyywy “q Arey cl6l ‘SAHA ‘Sanu 4 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. NGchece County In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant ...above named, if re found within your ty, to he and appear before the Judge of = at a Court to be held ih. ae oo at the Cougt House in AMM. on the Monday after the Ly r—-..Monday of .. the same being the = Ea day of... Clit aetALvt¥a answer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant .take notice if, he trey~tail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff.......will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this ZA 7 “day 194.22....... CC TA. 2h. wet: Clerk of Sfiperior Courh > 2z. ae CEE County. e ——S “YO 1n0> IoLIadng aq} jo Pearag PeaTaooyy ‘Aun 557 FF BEPUS 0 "03 ajqeusnjey 431734 UO4 SNOWMAS o ISNIVOV ._-.~ “AsUIONY Syyyet : A Pe Mrefrry; of eo “SIY} BMI a1OJeq pequiosqns pue 0} WIOMSG *‘sHOT}NDexe woIJ }dmexs Ajrado3d pur sayjty1qet] ‘s}qop Sly aAoqe pue I9AO SI¥[JOP pespuny OA} JO UNS 94} G}IOM st aq SAeSs uIOMS BuIAEq (‘1e9g) ° (‘1eag) (‘Te9g): mm Ora 'v jo Aep SIq} ‘s[vas pue spuey Ino ssouyt ‘mo1}0e8 Sq} ur HUULelg 24} Jo 1aA0oe1 Aew JUBPUIJZEQ 2) Se 3S0O yons qe" juepuajeq 243 Aed [peys™ gyuareyg oy} yt “waamoy ‘pIOA 9q 03 ‘sIe][0q~ ’ ras juepuajaq ay} “OJUN PUNO SeATesINO a3pea;Mouyoe 9M LSNIVOV f ‘Ayanodg ‘yNO| sovedng 243 UY | ‘¥WNITON¥D HLYON 4O SL¥LS “gq Areyp ‘sinyury ‘SAH A Sandyy Clél ‘q Arey ‘singuy ‘SA*H A SUNY clél SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N, C. 3-15- 13-1M. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North To the Sheriff of 0 1 Neen County—GREETING: Wou are Hereby Commanded to summon MELE (263]) (263}) (265)) the defendant ...above nained, if ) a found within your Sra to be and appear before the Jud$e of uperior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of....... at the Court House in 8}| eucy on the Monday after the Monday of 2’ {0 pe “a the same being the day of 191....., and answer the complaint, a Copy 6 which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if Mb..ttreg fai? to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return, Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this 14 day of UNM ewbhu/ 191’ Clerk of Superior Court " paateoay “="9} a[qeuInjay ‘AgITIA YO SNOWNWAS 7 JO JNOD AO1adng ayy jo Ayunos SVG?) oN jo Aep S14} SUI s10Jaq paquosqns pue 0} aIOMS ‘suo}Ndax9 wWoIy ydutaxe Aysadoid pue sanitiqer ‘s}qap sty aaoqe pue 1300 SIB]]OP pespuny OM} jo Wns 94) 40M st ay SARS DIOMS Bu1Eq (129g) (189g) (19g) 161 ‘q‘y jo Aep S14} ‘Sjvas pue spuey imo ssanz My ‘uoljoe sty} ur PNUIeg 24} JO 1aa0de1 Aeut JUBPHIZIQ] 213 SB ys09 yous [[e yUepuayeq ay} Aved |jeqs we HHarelq 24} jt ‘aAsmoy ‘pIOA 3q 0} ‘sue[}og “yO Tins 94} Uf ‘node stq] ot JWEPHsjag o43 “OVUN punog seajasino a3pajmouydoe oy LSNIVOV (-Aqunoy ( ‘¥NITIONVO HLYON 4O AL¥LS ‘VND s0luadng ay} uy ‘q Arey, ‘sinqyry ‘SAH (AY “Sinty Clél *q Arey ‘sinyury SA*H “AA Sanqyy clél North Carolina . Superior Court Iredell County. November 19th,1913. Mary ?.Arthurs vs AFFIDAVIT FOR SERVICE OF SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION. Will Arthurs Mary Arthurs,plaintiff above named after being duly Wworn,deposes and says; That in the above entitled aetion now pending in the Superior Court of Iredell County, the Sheriff has returned the summons issued to her in said action endorsed," Defendant Will Arthurs not to be found j in Iredell County, said to be out of the State"; thet the defendant therein cannot,after due diligence, be found within the State; that said defendant is a necessary and proper party to said action the object of which is to seeure a divoree absolute on the grounds of férnieation and adultery on the BWSHNNSN part of said defendant,who is the husband of plaintiff. WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays that an order be. made by the Court thet service of summons be made on said defendant by publication in some newspaper published in Iredell County North Carolina as provided by law. This November 19th,1913. Sworn to and subseribed before me this November 19th,1913. ~ Olerk Superior Court. ‘q Arey ‘sinquy ‘SA "H “AA ‘Sunquy clél North Carolina Superior Court Iredell County Nov.19th,1913. Mary P.Arthurs vs ‘ ORDER OF PUBLICATION, Will Arthurs It appearing from the affidavit of Mary Arthurs, plaint- iff in this action,that Will Arthurs defendant herein,can- not,after due diligence,be found within the State;and it further appearing that this action is for the purpose of securing a divorcee a vineulo on the groungs of fornication and adlultery on the part of the defendant,who is husband of plaintiff: IT is therefore ordered that a hotice of this action be published onee a week for four weeks in the Stat- esville Sentina],a newspaper published in Iredell County, setting forth the title of the action,the purpose of the same together with a brief reeital of the subject matter and requiring the defendant to appear at the next Term of Superior Court of Iredell County to be held on the 5th Monday b efore the lst Mondey in Jan.,same being the 26th day of Jan.1914,at the Court house of said County,and answer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff,or the relief demanded in the compiaint will be granted. This November 19th,1913. Clerk Superior Court Iredell. “SA JeTI2ey *TTemMqy [THM ‘TTemy = ot a Ce A Xx. { ~~ Pores . - lc Ze Pe \ qh Bratt 3 <n Nek. — wie dee ie Pie bee oan a “SA VeTIIeH *TTemqy | jo Copeece Thine act V ln ~ <_ ™ alto i haamamird Bde cscs x + Sa | Herne. grovera PEEE™ 7 ae ercecgcteny - Be Ortry gam [a~Ae4eo~ Gexrok di << Eee ues,” led fo , ve i Firsts © tte, Ca. ts, Leictiieinpne sitll ns ALt tums f . - a = Pa “Tk cial +Y “fe — Herz. po hee D111 es } acho, Ancol Lar ER ema, | S44 OE If OUT = SUPERIOR COURT SUBPQ2NA—Drake & Son, Printers. State of Borth Carolinas, | To the Sheriff of County---Greeting : Mon ave Hereby Commanded to Summon personally to appeay before thy Judge of our Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said County at the Court-House i,Z.£ LAMA: LA ira on the... E... Monday after the. 4 Cy ial onday_in And this you shall Be omit, under the penalty prescribed by Law. witness....2:. ‘7 “AALS ) + POTL Cty i tf . Ta Lo Lae f Sep k i { 4 ‘ j : ‘ / ' ' . | | >» A | PeaT 5 . Ci GB th ele Wd i « or i, 4 i j bd P al | ae | | i & f a: Wilkam, Mare, AM tr fe be ny Ager’ os ee atte bors > ome Menten | a ee ZZ PFE Hong Aasteler Con er nr Pn 2tz Fe | Letl a0 Lo frag | Aleut Pee oe eed Be TA ta a olpe ot ep ean Jae Balen App Pgs Fi fees <a : 7 a: Vi a | i PN: ast ine TOU ust | q | one Di Wesceteseceeeteserese sees LAM seagnrt—U5 THR HETRIOR COURT Hill! THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLIN PZ | : To the Sheriff of, € Cheb La CL- ... County—GREETING : GEE AE ZZ — Monday of , Pie ME: Aff oi and answer the complaint which will be deposited ip the office of the Clerk of the é ; ° hires 1440 » Pf Bice Lh, Kate wa Superior Court for said County, within ummons, and let the said Defendant... ef taKe SA fait to artswer the stid’ compleaiit-wittin that time, the the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Herein fail not, and of this summons make due return. 4) Given under my hand and the seal of said Court, this mat 187. Zs ea Atwell, William vs. Atwell, Harriet SumMons For REBIEF. PRebitimadle to o.oo oes seenses- Term, 187... — _of the Superior Court of........-...+-++++ a vy saw eeerreweeeeeeee eee Peewee eee reer eee eee oan Recsived Rel... Pot Aa Served ocd. ia De - Mg act — semen ees 1 eS ; —— Ez ore _Conity, dppf bore Fecht Gore Hate Lr... CS 2y- coy ce Cobbs elaine ahs Sta sk saa cer Toten ag a ie. Lee Sete QO Ane 4¢0 °S Dive Le Affe or eee ne Crse2ese > act. ic . wa CPS Cees r™ feneo (deo $ Ma. De eonerage Com elor< eft ew, ae A 2nZ. Le Wf net 0 Gi eae eag. iar Ae ER Micehew sec ww << Te rE 7a e272 Honey 4 O 27a Aclitl ry An? Ys | Aa aS ane Creel seenecee Seta? Veg Aecr Lox ~Ftgz2er RE ab tcl ‘Wee Jaume. Lan (Mcce. Gy + anol. Zee Seat (lhe. denial) le: Poeeeen ssi ef ales) Ce“ ot. dine fLte O —2-7' ec Afni Ly Le act Ais A Co-ane he. go-go 2.0 . Pi, en are ree MS F bots Op tha ot (feecSy Ty 4 Lt i vs. Atwell, Harriet North Carolina In the Superior Court ‘Iredell County May Term 1900 Mary E.B.Ayers, plaintiff. Vs Complaint. James Ayers, defendant. The plaintiff complains of the defendant and says; First--- That she and the defendant intermarried some thirteen years ago and lived together as man and wife for several years, Second~-- That the offspring from said marriage are five children, all, now living and residing withthe plaintiff, supported and maintained by her. without any aid or support from the defendant. Third--- That on or about the first day of Qecember 1898, the defendant separated himself from the plaintiff and has not since said date lived with her or in any manner contributed to her support or that of the child dren, their common heritage. That ever since the marriage aforesaid the Plaintiff was a true and dutiful wife, doing in her power to sustain life and bring their children to proper age and responsibility. Fourth--- That plaintiff is and has been a resident of the County of re- dell and State of North carolina all her life and that the facts set forth in her foregoing complaint have existed to her knowledge more than twelve months before the institution of this action, Wrerefore plaintirr demands judgment against the defendant; Pirst--- That the bonds of matrimony axisting betweenherself and the defen dant be dissolved ; that she have the custody of the children, the issue of said marriage and for such other and further releif as may be just and ‘i Ke. §, Pa ricee Atty For plaintiff. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term 1900 Mary E.B. Ayers, plaintiff] Affidavit. ~ Vs James Ayers, defendant. ' ! { { Mary E.B.Ayers being duly sworn Says; that the facts set forth in her com- plaint are true to the best of her knowledge and beleif and that said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between herself andvh her said husband and not for the mere purpose of being freed and sep from each other but in sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint; that the facts set forth in her complaint » &8 grounds for a divorce, have existed for more than twelve months next before the filing of this complaint; that she has been a rsbdent of this State for more than two years next preceeding this complaint Sworn to and Subscribed before me This /'X day of May 1900 One Year, $2.00 Six Months, 1.00 CALDWELL & CLARK, Proprietors. Three 7a .50 2 IssvUED TWICE A WEEE-TVESDATS AWD FRIDA Aatawile, pOlug 2 ¥ = HE LANDMAN ~ omen I Furnished CALDWELL & CLARK, Proprietors. on Application. _ One Year, $2.00 - Six Months, 1.00 | ‘Th pay. .50 Bai. ‘FO & rIssvUED TWicks A WEEIE-TUEBSDATS AWD FRIDATS. ay Pla = = tl’ Ch cotesd aa j | | a Ayers, Mary E. B. vs, Ayers, James Worth Carolina Superior Court Iredell County Febry Term 1901 Vary F.B.Ayers, plaintiff. vs Judgment. i} James Ayers, defendant. This penne coming on to be heprd at this term of the Court before His Honor, Brown, sual, and a me upon the whole “The resord in the cause and being heard, and ‘ehe\ Jury having © foundras its verdict that the defendant abandoned and left ® ~ Se plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint; that he failed ta ” seieee for her and the ehildren , the offspring of their marriage, and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the State for more than two years prior to the bringing of the sui aetion; It is therefore eonsidered and adjudged by the Court, that the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be dissolved; that plaintiff have the custody of said children and that she recover her cost expended. Judge Presiding. tuo) to treque antfows) ds10 LoeL mrieT yideT ystosod LILebertl ottisnielq ,@1evA.4,.7 ytaM tremgbst ay ae ae . trabie ip ,21eYA some ¢uroD edt to orret afd? ta pepo ed ot mo antimoo onuse alKdT a A ae SO Se Se Bee _ afodw eft mnogu yiwt 8 bas ,@pbutl ,mword , tomok art froted B nan . uitvand wisb/ed? bas . brised yal of baa oateso oft at greet . e 4. ‘tel baa benobnseds tnabneteb edt tadt toibiev att Rab rime T ot beftst end tadt ;t¢ntuiqvoo edt nt bogella as ~TYtinialq eds ttedt to gntiqatto edt , motbitdo oft bnew tod tot sbivotg oft to tnebtee: s mood aad Tiitatald oe: it bone ,enein ten edt to nekLuninrd ef? of toltq a isey ows nad? stom tot siasa jfoltos tad? ,two ed? yt begby\bea bra bertedblanoe siotered! ef sI edit bra ttttntalq ent meewted yntteatxe ynominsam To abnod ef? to yvbosavo oft ovet Ttitntealq stadt ,bevloasib od tnabroteb sbebneqxe taoo tod tevooes ofa sad? one newbficdoe biae North Carolina, Iredell County. In The Superior Court. State Of North Carelina, to A.S.MoKay, - Greeting: We, reposing special trust and confidence in your integrity, do authorize and empower you to cause Cristina Bailpy to appear before you on the 26th, day of Jam. 1912, and her on oath to examine touching all such matters and things as she shall know of and concerning a certain matter or contro- versey in our Superior Court for the County of Iredell panding wherein H.C.Bailey is plaintiff and Mammie Bailey is defendant. And the depesition in writing by you so taken the same to tra- usmit sealed with your seal to our Superior Court to be held for / ¢ the County on the 29th day of Jan. 1912. Witness J.A.Hartness at office in Statesville, N.C. this Bec, 14th, 1911 (ug 6 e Suen sure. W e. ee. KS S = z ‘SA *D "H “Ayreg Cl6l Nerth Carolina, Iredell County. H.C.Bailey Vs, Mammie Bailey. pursuant to the annexed commission to me directed, I, A.S.McKay commissioner under the authority thereof, on the 25th, i of Jam. 1912 at one oclock pm. be De OR: Samy County of Iredell State of North Carolina, neither plaintiff or defendant in person nor py att'y, proceeded to take the deposition of Christina Bailey who being first duly sworm to speak the truth between the plaintiff and the defendant deposes and says : Q- What is your name? - Athrrt 1 D 2 oS <= Ss: 30 oO < a Cl6I acs do you live? a- Aawer fro 2 Q Oy is your age and the state of your health? ae Upon, bole gant 3 i YG filial j~ Are you abel to attend Court at Statesville, N.C. at this geason of the year? s- Wor 4 4 Q- De you know Mrs. Mammie Bailey wife of H.C.Bailey? a5 Yl Q- Did You knoe her at the time of her marriage to H.C. Bailey? we Ye. Q-Did you ever at any time after her marriage to H.C.Bailey make an examination of her private parts,if so whem and how many times, and what did you find to be the condition of her. private parts from said examinations? 2- From your examination was she or was she not capable of having sexual intercourse with her husband? -_ Lfet wea w0F 8 q- Did Mrs. Bailey af any time make any statement to you concerning her condition and if so what did she say? | Lntirrs O- oe + ie Six Ne he § Af Tae brace Jiu SF Cee tee 9- Q- Was her condition a natural detpenity of the body? i- A Ly) The foregoing deposition of Christina Bailey was orn to and subacribed before me at the time and place mantioned above, This the 25th, day of Jan. 1912, w =. - KS ry = =. ‘SA “2D *H “Ayreg Cl6l SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. \.County.-- In the Superior Court. by SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. the defendant....above named, if. le; be found within your County, to be and appear before the a, of ou Superior Court, at a Court to be held for th punty of 2 Leaded. le SZ at the Court House Vilieaalhe on the......./ iB =Monday after the £ Si of DMA td the same being the .. ZA 2Aay of GZ CA 19K and dnswer the complaint, a copy of which willbe deposited in the office of the Clerk of the ‘Superior Court for said County, within the fifst three days of said Term, and let said Defendant..........take notice i ‘«.they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff......will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. a i WME 194 Sex (Lad Clerk of it * PeATooay af Ri yinos roredng 3m} jo Ele i oY, Z 0} aqeuanjay ‘431738 40d SNOWWAS : SI} Dat D1OJIq pequosqns pue 0} WIOMG *‘suOI}NIexe wWoIj }dulexe kyxadoxd pue sarzi[iqel] ‘s}qep Siy sAoge pue I32A0 SI¥[[OP pespuny OM} JO WINS 94} YOM St ot sXes uioms 3ureq™ (‘jeag) ~ (‘1e9g) - (-1eag)’ Oe iy ; jo Aep> Siq} ‘s[eas pue spuey Ino ssn "HO1jOe SIq} Ur “"Yyurelg 243 Jo 19A00e1 Avr JUBPHSjed 2} SB 3909 yons |e" juepuayaq oy} Aed [jeqs™~ , ’ ~~ MeL ay ft “aAamoy ‘pIoA 3q 03 ‘sze][Oq™ " fe. yuepusyeq 94} “oyun we S2A[ISINO VSpa| MOU AE IAA oe J) NIVOV na oF SPD 7s : i of { -eD % 7 a SOP y\ ‘yunod s0uedNg 943 UT { ‘¥YNITIONVO HLYNON AO SLY¥LS il i - ae In the Superier Court Herne +022. Nerth Carelina, Iredell County. Heury C. Bailey ; Vs. | GOMPLAI ET . 4 Mamie Bailey. Theplaintiff cemplaining of the defendant alleges: 1.That the said He ury C.Bailey imtermarried with Mamie Batley, the defendant abeve nmamed,on er about the 25th day ef July ,19le,accerding te the laws ef Iredell Ceunty,Nerth Carelina,and that they lived tegether fer a peried ef abeut three weeks,when the said defendamt abandened the said plaintiff,ef her ewn accerd witheut amy cempulsien er ill treatment en the part ef the said plaintiff,amd that she has lived separate and apart frem him since that time,and that her whereabeuts is new unknown te him, 2.That at the time ef the said marriage ef the plaintiff and defendant,she was and still is physically impetent,that she was not capable ef cepulatien,ewing te a defeemity ef her generative ergans. Wherefore the plaintiff prays the ceurt te grant an erder di- vercing the said Weury C.Bailey frem his wife,the said Mamie Bailey,ab- selutely on the account ef the said impetency,and that the clerk tax the cests accerding te law. A a Atty er ain Henry Bailey being duly swern depeses and says : Ti , the facts set ferth in the foregeing cemplaint are trues to the best ef his knew] - ‘edge and belief,except as to th ose matters stated therin on infermatien and belief and as te those he bekieves it te be true;that he has filed the said cemplaint net eut ef cellusien between him abd the said Mamie Bailey,but in sincerity and truth fer the sauses set eut in the complaint; that the said facts have existed te his knowledge fer mere than six menths © praer te the filing ef this complaint;and that the said Hemry C,@ailey and the said Mamie Bailey have resided in this state tex mere that twe years next preceeding the cemmencement of this action. Subscribed and swera te before me, Ih pee eT Nerth Carolina, Im the superier Court. Iredell County, H.C. Bailey Va. ATTidavit. Mamie Bailey J.W.Van Hoy being duly sworn depeses and says that in the abeve enti- tled action now pending in the superior court of said ceunty,the sheriff of said county has returned the summens issued to him in said actien, endorsed ''Not te be found in my ceunty'',that the defendant therein can- not after due diligence and enquiry be found in the state; thai said defend- ant is a proper party te said action,which is an actien breught by H,C. Bailey against ‘famie Bailey. Wherefore, the plaintirr prays that an order be made by the ceurt that summons be served on the said defendant by publication ia some news peper published in [Iredell county, North Carelina, TROL LT Lp, Nerth Carelina, In the superier ceurt. Iredell County ME Pasty Ve It appearing from the affidavit of J.W.Vam Hey in this action that Nnarte Loalad ,the defendant thereia is not te be found in Iredell siotuniiy gale ela after due diligence be feund in the State,and ( Oréér eS publicatien ef summons, 4t further appearing that a summons has been issued to the sheriff of Tredell county commanding him to summon the defendant abeve named to appear in said actien,and that said summons has been returned marked''jjot to be found in my county'',and that said defendant is not to be fount by due diligence and enquiry in the State,and that said defendant is a necessary jana party te said action: It is therefore ordered that notice of this action be published in The Statesville Sentinel,a news paper published in Iredell county ,for four weeks,settim fourta the title of tne action,the purpose ef the same, | { and requiring the defendant te ae ai the term co ~ oe uperior t of AN the ceurt heuse in said ceunty,and amswer or demur to the complaint of the plaintiff ait Glerk of the superier court, This’ day <a Tredell county,to be held on the = Monday Hid “T Gy) eJtveo tet wD e. - = ry 3. a ee) =, i — - OQ < ” Cl6l nue “Ayre SA “DH “Alreg 16] bdo _ tue “Apreg SA zy ‘H ‘Ayreg 16] c please Note: Document(s) Repeated Intentionally SIWUIP Al ‘Apieg Cl6l Document(s) | Repeated Intentionally Please Note: Nerth Carelina, iu The Superier Ceurt, iredell Geunty, August Term,1911, Heury C, Bailey Va. Mamie Bailey. C.S.Alexander,editer and publisher ef The Svatesville Sentinel, & hevWs paper published in irdell Ceunty,state aleresaid, being duly svern Says:That the annexed advertisement ef netice in _he actiea entitled J.Bailey Vs.liamei Baliev, duly published in the ateresaid news paper ence a week fer feur weeks, beginning with the issue ef 27 day er 1911 LU ge tr tegen amd PuOlisher This the 7 day ef Aug. 1911. Halter ; Baily, H. C. vs. Baily, Mamie 1912 e defends Dc hiltha alos en- titled case will take notice that on the 25th day of January 1912, a1 0’clock p, m., and thereafter, at the office of A. S. McCay in Iredell county, North Carolina, before A. S. McCay, commission- er, the-undersigned plaintiff will take the deposition of Christina. Bailey, to be read in evidence for the plaintiff in the above en- titled action which is now pend- . ing in the superior court of Ire- dell county, state of North Caro- lina, and the said defendant will further notice that if the taking of said deposition is not ‘ begun and aaa on the said day, the same will be continued \from day to day-until completed. H. C. Batuey, Plaintiff WEATHERMAN & VAN Hoy, Attorneys. This Dec. 14, 1911. Aetted °O °H Z G7? T?7O , 9 J ‘ c “""HLIM LINNOOOV NI*** DNVACGV Z2T6l ‘Tt *aed TANILN?* a sfeur0zzy ‘oH ueA pues ueUIEy BOM “9]JOuoEDaY, aid £2j0n7 Bujty reap “muanayy NOX Buuey I 44 Hf Stilts, DC, Feb. 1, 1912 y97_ Vv i. c. ‘Bailey —— and Van Hoy, Attorneys ee Ties Advertising Rates are Reasonable. It Will Bring You Returns. the Best People of This and Adjoining Counties naam ; publication of notice of summons | $4 00 orureyy “ATreg SA‘) "H ‘Areg C16I | Way the Alcesie RU ae 6 dale? Ch Corr hlaigh e (pies yee ik a Mae : | Whe fla oe M G be Bale, Le / a oly the ae Abte7 paste ? heh Ya (jur< Attire Pedic / qe 3 I ae C J fe OOF 4s: Jrt a3 [Bartle AX Lfken . TH Pe te. ¢- Ads” 21 ae 32 Se ZA ,hae lef f tine Oy, Kd ee wcll Wherqoe ca lhe 2712fiotenP i or py ddrvac/ 1911- ’ Jy + J Kr in. ce ae UGAMY l_< attire , of re) jot ge ae fe Atecem 7 tA) r31222K Ag 2 - Ha | Z. Lect pf aw? te ae wAcll A fa-422 < cable 27% fit Lent -” fj il / i Coen os. — a nelsoni 25 Pa / / i/ by ZY ™ “OU, | 1 y ae sails hat —L Baily, H. C. vs. Baily, Mamie 1912 North Carolina In the Superior Court Ifedell County January Term, i912. H. C. Bailey vs Judgment Mamie Bailey This cause coming on to ve neara ana veing nearda at the January Term of the Superior Court of Iredell County before His Honor, G. S. Ferguson, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the issues submitted to them as appears in the record, and it appearing to the court from said verdict that the defendant was,at the time of #¢## the said marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant and still is, naturally impotent; It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the plaintiff and the defendant b a same are hereby dissolved mp be o¢ SY 7 Judge Presiding. \ eR FT | AL Badéy (ip Warn Ul Balt, Baily, H. C. vs. Baily, Mamie 1912 ZZ, we. or il eas thet tale | aaa a ar wk Mead tetednw Me Ae Lev Cell A_frec pack ga | SZ Mo fla Gf ever of He Clin. Gf ee el ey on “git ye ae cee) tel oe gy ap GD Dae cn: slate AG Cpct4tr f § FF 2 \W—Ci.htt Ca ona Be Latrtend aus \a/ Aen ae ite... Cre een cte (2 L4ZA \ selleeteat Off <2 v2 cde Pacer <igieae a aoenetaas (2 oat, De Ayper« Baik Corenriticr | aA tec Ng a ta a pees Le, CO Gees = fit acideel 7726 : ; | Deere dnt , eae i spd LFF 8 Ble anon alee age Mee 4 vile Bath ae me He tmntnty Calne JleeinGs ox forwere— | hag Wha fila tiff fd! frr~ Grea a ont eghaoNens hong Bho Gy A a. Cie hegre Naud <a ea | (Phere et (Whee Jo Lan AGY Risececebs ——— A i le A A nm Vom panne | ete ty pi ge L412 CLO Atrnx Ss AG ia ee BOB oan. } Aastedin Q [ “SA Gosttm ‘A[Teg 7 I< sie us il i le Sew a cy fang i, aan Aecceretelyy cd ae gre Sis ssl ata Re ee a ge @e aw Mallaaneinan, Meatless damm Pe ZZ ZZ, dj. Linn tt dna out for Bi ma | Fg Ce a cng od eat Moc ttt Lak oc a ao “. ASTItL ‘AT Teg Peer flaS- aw Lan, Ha ea Dips aS | I ee Fine ne aa Ce a ae | Leg tide ae peli | | | | | Aad eX — ae Protec Corn [At (eae. | 2, Bow, | Lh. Mafe% at afl oe : Qo ~ aS oH Kemi gy 68 24 aT fr mee iP wanes Ct breech Zhe ce re fof 7 nd: he. pn Coole Ke hay of phat a ety Leck LLOWF | fenas le ceted = LEAL (Zee.< Ge el ss protec i paceman ‘petunia Agee Ate (Fx Aas Oe fecer la. ae 7 Ahacy f frees LO at HE 1 ACLLC€ cums Met Cttt CALL eee (Geeeal letrectocecceeseK eo A js 7 fo Clerr<: wo ian 4 neor & exe ee A he Le pee LUAA QBarwlwevr I nig efi hake £ Aur Ae rmed ii gge sees. arp AeoPmr, ' dhe Aaffaus Hak atauwstocnter® ane eae fee A ish, Mee Ae pa cake. Bega e | CiceP lems cats ty Ls ee za Se lave p< ea oe P Ae flee x hE Pein : ; Loe tte “eo be “a Jul ihe sb a 2 (ALC Ee a es fi - ati oe (2 stcacte Capea ae \ootiek Orki.ued ahocek Gevce. cect — | (Hak ectcecy gee of vast Aouad, it oo filer <p prac (eel re Grate rt Ke vce Cécca AL2 Lo Lecoe ps APoPee, she a tassek, tyne ses eae Cece coc llccy ALey Pode Conthe Ma. Cages lak Ae 77 | aa ChpiflerK A Meth ly cole cee Aah fa | dak trek Labins ak ne | Late ade Bees fase,” Paudesc oe AL oa hiuagt. te ; afte ¢ a A tem fe acne fe at A- oe weit Ct ft wet. ALCL CL an. ee tomete. te feceeuts Gov recites ? LAA OPA le (72 wrttlat> for CO GAC4A424£ 2 Hah : Dpbbres Se (a gh Orost vl ae ne hei Cece oom | Q Ve fiatiheceg Y CAS CC CEX-S | Cat Back Ae Oboe 24 (ok Buk coer ae eae yi 5 ic il a Ptr V/A he fit> patch Aa A PO day Crertfla. 9 / WA ” o a Me Ga A (Of e4< @h Japaete (204... #7 COH he Cu tte, ’ A , . a Came FUAPEL. FOO CLAG Se setae al Mean a a ¢ fi ‘ f OL @t-k Ce Ly et.40.40 sf - a ge ~<a, 4 ee vbe ie fle Accel for Aes. ee ths feterceed Aha Mise dian tncte frovece hak Ba Croceed 4 ee aia Mn dudes f #2 & et aS a. O€e e2ex 7 + fetetG - a2eafad al —f. > i as x & Ge cts as a anes) bod, Ar. Airth Cnesbid 1 CR fetuiy Gg Fe vs. Barber, E. WwW. / V4 (Piet He hirnaccerck wich Fe Affice tae ue Gren a Circ iteaden SEEF (A cefesne Czec crcl nk eet ti Je Pence Come aud, ot freer oi fren ty auto! cee an Balak of fore Beek Perloreceeo a .. o> orth Cagoljina, In the Superior Court, r 1l Gounty. November Terme 1897. jab ie Vee Ne — & bs The plaintiff complains and alleges: he That about the eoeeday Of «eseel8Se~ the righté@ of mat- rimony were duly celebrated in the county of Iredell between the plaintiff and the defendant. B. That they lived together in the home Ofsessecsecccccces tte erereeerecceceecs and lived hapily together about the space Of... severe; when the defendant bagan to aet strange- dy::as if affected in mind, and the mother of the defendant @ame and took her to her mother's home, where she has regid- eda ever since. S- That when the defendant returned to her mother's home the defendant recovered of her apparrent strangeness ai once, ami has ever since been in as perfect a condition as she ever was, and soon after her return to her mother's home the pla- intifr tried to induee her to return to him and live with him as she had done before, and he has tried often to cet ‘oO her: tenresum to him, but she has always refused and still refuses to return to the plaintiff, or to allow the Plaintiff to live with her, and she has totally and finally abandoned the plaint iff. 4 That thei plaintiff and the defendant have not lived to- gether BF OMe sc vecreccescvscccesescovccceees elBSee, and the plaintiff has not had the privilege of conjugal embraces from that time to this. e100 OL198qGuB eis al eVORL eaxieT s0odmovol ° “ ee «oe #6 &© &¢ reege dia baw ental ygnoo Yrisnisig T > 3 ionic “gm TO SIiigit ons ecthLesees 10 YBDeces YI tuode saiT ef neowsed LLebe1I to ysm-oo eis ni boeseitdeloo yYivb otow yrromit efoabno'teb eas bas Tiismtaly aiid el evouseueen cae Sa: oe at iendvegors bevil youd seaT oS ond suods ionveyod vdiqed Devil DNB gerecescerosererere® -onmeise JOB Od neged’ Jasbael ob ens moriw ‘gtabtvconst ous 78 Snebnetep ens ‘to i9ensom end bre ,~baim at besoetia ti es: :X4 -bigo? esi on8 oe todw « Omorl e'tendsom ton of “ed woos bite one eg0nmig tove Do ' ' omod a’ tensom Til OF pentwre1 Inapmoleb oad mosw Janit 8 o& como Js eseonoymeise Inetisgges tom Lo poteyooet sasormetvb old novo ore ef noisibnoe 8 soottog ee ni nood eonte Iovo sell us -slq eis emo a'10isom en OF misel TOn sotte coos DMS ,Bs¥ dttw ovtiL base min od miute1 oc ten eoubni os beitts tTiisal go, of netto bolts ean OA baa ,o10ted em» bad ons #8 an {itzse bre beer1o eysvis ean one sud min oF muso? Ov sort “*tgntelq ons wolls ov 10 gttisnzaig ens OF mrivte oF e9avlet sonebnads vilenii one videsos Sal vile eltisnialg oad <7 -os bevil Jom OVS: tmabrot op ois baw Yrrsntelq ond gjatT ef ) fis akscansunengnnsbenaneusssee y s matnamr 10117 Oy do Lane tave 2° onoLtviig o¢ best von ead Viivaiels ois eatus oF emis Jails io TL jaspne lob bits YViisnisly usod sant mot), ato r polity Jeiig O10 OteIe Giily ee ef ef 68 4 cinineeaeaaandeannaniaaanaiiiei scam (2) nencement of this action. b. That the defendant totally and finally abandoned the Lushmites prior to the year 1895, | WHEREFORE your cOmplainant asks judgment that your Honor would make a deeree dissolving the bonds of matrimo- hy which now exist between the plaintiff and; the defendant , Sec Sol; Y -: Z, t ip Attorneys Sor an Plaintiff. a And tbr general relief. g | el a : ‘ ’ easi YiLiggi ‘James H. Bass, the plaintiff fy tie ove case be- ) i NSE RN OBOE. Bt - ae 7 » Says that the facts stat oc the above gom- Plaint of hig own knowledge are true, and tho @ stated on information d belief he believes to be tue}, and that the said Liisa was and is not malle out of levity or by col- lusion with the defendant, and not for the mere purpose of being freed from each other; but said complaint is made in @incerity ana truth, and that the cause of this complaint i= tas existed more than two years to his own knowledge prior Subseribed and sworn to fore me/this t of brett, saa 8") ie ernie to the filing of this cOmplainte ae. emotios afis to Inomeonom eid bomnobasds yYilantt ons “risks tnabrolop ods sadT .0- 208L rs9ey offs Os 10L1g BMilsinisly 1s0¥% Jadt teeagout exes Inanislquoo 1s0oy SAOLaAaHW -omiisam to ebmod os gaivioeatb setp0b & edam bisow 10Noli ae ~HBbyoted) onl fbas Tiiromtaiq oie meswsod teixo, Wor. doipw. va Z 108 evomiossaA 2 : itsntelq ons ,evsd if ob. . owe i wre, 3 deus bane ,outt ote enbolwond mwo fu, to felg etotflor a af Drs oF Sf{s®z1043y d MYpA F Je Bris sseg ATT +n sseg *H soumr os . > . . . ~ & rippe dete eatost ons Janis B8YB2 . tsds brs fours ed ot sevetiod on teitlod b noi seuptotat rd to vtdvel to tuo elem Jon at baw esw Giisl quo: bine / - , 6 BogWw ot%u oAvy Tl Jom Das , TBD. oteb ons dtiw nolfeul mt obem ef snieiquoo bisa sud ,1ens0 nexe mori pee xanisd m inieiqmoo ekis to eevee ond Jend Dae .Adnis bis ystioorn is “uoinq eybeiwond mwo ein oc Bisey OWs Many SOM! beseixe esa etaialguoo eius to gmil:t ous og —wovol to yeabees OAS Bing om ot0lse os m1iowe Dis poditosdue eVGsh1 Oe CG fone ge tok Go f4ABE- 7. oo ht hve) * ZC he caath a wee ae y tha ce teow’ ) bb. ecch ovis & 64 Sx Bbrit,~ tltigaleere cr forepl tte, Gud Atha Gu 2 ha , ‘ WA JZ [hat Wee Leen ADracX, Cllepelgy, jt for 5 ag. Jen. Don “a North Carolina, : In the Superior Court« Iredell County. : July Term-1919. Plorence Freeland Beaver,minor by her next of friend W,.8.Freeland vs. Robert Beaver,minor and his Guardian Ad Litem,J.W.Beaver Complaint. *e *e© ©@ «8 «8 #8 The plaintiffs complain and alleges: 1. That Florence Freeland Beaver is a minor and a resident of Tredell county,N.C. and that the defendant Robert Beaver is a minor without general or testamentary guardian and is a resident of Iredell county ,N.C. and that the said Florence Freeland Beaver intermarried with the said Robert Beaver on the day of December,1917 in the State of South Carolina and that the relation of husband and wife has existed ever since, 2. That because of the cruel and inhuman manner in which the plaintiff Florence Ruuxax Freeland Beaver was treated by the said Robert Beaver,the said Florence Freeland Beaver left the home of the said Robert Beaver on the day of January,1918 and went back 3, That the said Robert Beaver did commit adultry with ~ Williams on or about the dav of Aurust.1°78 an at other and various times in the count@or Tredellfm@r the said Florence Freeland Beaver freeing her absolutely from the bonds of matrimony and that the said bonds of matrimony be dissolve: further relief as she may be entitled to recover. —~. Plorence Freeland Beaver b¥ing duly sworn deposes and says that sho o_f | has read the foregoing complaint and that the things therein stated ¢ stated on infor amtion and belief and as to those she believes it to be true;that this complaint is not made out of levity or by weing freed and separated from each other,but in sincerety and in truth for the causes mentioned in the complaint: that the facts set months prior to the filing of this complaint; that she has been a resident of the State of North Carolina for two pears next to the home of her father,where she has resided continuously since, Wherefore the plaintiffs prgy that a divorce may be granted to and that she recover the cost of this action and:for such other and haricoy for ay are true of her om knowledge except an to those things therein collusion between husband and wife and not for the mere purpose of forth in the complaint have existed to her knowledge more than six preceding the filing of this sgomplaint,. Sworn to and subscribed before me th ¢ July ,191%, Notary Public, yoqoy “Joavog ‘SA “4 DOUDIOL4 ‘IdARIg North Barolina, : In the Superior Court- Iredell County. : July Term-1919. Florence Freeland Beaver,minor by her next of friend,”.S,Freeland . vs, Robert Beaver,minor and his Guardian ad litem,J.W.Beaver. Affidavit. ee s6@ 66 66 To the Clerk of the Superior Court: W.S.Freeland,next of friend of Florence Freeland,Beaver,being duly sworn deposes and says that Robert Beaver,the defendant in the above entitled action is a minor and is a necessary party to this action which is an action for divorce on the fround of adultry. Wherefore the said W.S,Freeland hereby makes application for the appointment of a guardian ad litem by the court of some suitable person to represent and act as guardian ad litem for the said minor,Robert Beaver and to represent him in this proceedings, This the 5th day of July,1919, © this the 5th day of Julyv,1919. Sworn to andssubscribed befor h ly Commission Expires Oct, 28th, 1920 yoqoy “Io2ARag ‘SA “4 Q0USdIO].4 “IDAROg DW Oo oO eS & = < Oo Oo se J Tl) oS ” A 3 as oO Ty < ¥ North Carolina, : In the Superior Court-~ Iredell County. * July Term-1919, Florence Freeland Beaver,minor ! by W.S.Freeland,next of Priend:: vs. Affidavit. Robert Beaver,minor and his $3 suardian ad litem.J.W.Beavor To the Clerk of the Superior Court of Iredell County: W.S.Freeland being sworn deposes and says that in the above entitled procedure,Florence Freeland Beaver is a minor with a general or testamentary guardian and that she is entitled to a divorce from her husband,Robert Beaver on the ground of adultry and that the said plaintiff desires to bring an action in this court for divorce, Wherefore the said W.S.Freeland makes application to said court to appoint a next of friend for the said minor,Florence Freeland Beaver,who is daughter so that she may bring her action. Sworn to and susbscribed bef, me this the 5th day of July,1919. ommission Egpire Qct. 28th, 1920 yoqoy “J9ARIg ‘SA "J DOUDIOL J “JOAROG SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady Printing Company, Statesville, N. C. County—In the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. To the Sheriff of _c4-L YOU ARE ps COMMANDED aac 5 : | the defendant.4_above named, a> found within your County, to be gnd, appear before the Judge of our, Superior Court) at a Court to b& held for thy Cgnpt pape weeds the Court House in AL ithe, MBM 1 Pricncny of the same being the. ’ which will be deposit or said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let said Defendant take notice if they fail to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due returpy Given under my hayd and seal of said Court, this J, Fe of | | : | Noiz 33 ” 4 ° ' Z| BEE ee Oe eee i? ® --~2=------ pee cihccicaa dns we 22S, Pe a4 ' i z 7 8! hos weg) } 1 fees a : ws sh ~ ; ' ' i ae = 5 “J = ® i ’ ; @ OP lett erdnnncnctclicsane ae an : ' ' i = og Pmmeeet it ot ft : gainst. : 34 PeB ER: | = > ¥ ; Py a ; ‘ So « ee = =f : ' i i . 2 ! gue Fre: | 4 4 ~s---+-~---5,-~--8.-~ oe Sur Bt wR yt SS gee [<4 " a a wm 1 > ' Pe PRP Le Rete si eS Me ph z oe ! s ~ 6 5 3 ' i ; ; o -----~----- Os ww ata guia ec @ ; st ; ' ' i rz ; a i mE Po 4 = | a ® eT Sf th | i ; poi ; o e =e Q ‘ ’ ' =? : ‘ z ~ es a > | ' ; £ ' ae ‘ ; So SUMMONS: FOR “RELIEF gE PR s2 ei A ss ) e — | = i S g ‘ : = | : ' = | . s Ft Fo) See Returnable to. , ' = e-3 os , he = i i i ts i - fan a Gee JeTeorm, 191.._. | ! 5 i eet * Wa cellibogin i c : | fb PAteEi | |g of the Su Se F ae i aut @ ' ; ae of_.<.2. S4.---4 County. E 3 | a 2 i 1 »> a a mie & | = ; oe a? ae Received ...._____ ' Sm wee: i o 8 ; : } ety iisnlicaniiig caitlin Rectan 295 3. ' ta a) a —_ : ' S on ag Ve rin aa lcs ts Gopi id 2 £ ov pk - y ore : he =. ; : > 6 9 + hop Satie ini ’ 8 3 ee i ! < 5 i / ‘ - t ae or ‘ Xs Pe aS pee Bains ee a ° i ; Aad eS ae | ras | epg d ; : ‘ i } DR ' ' { : : ' ' i Cent Ro. | 1 ot Pe i | od @ a4 4 a a : A ; ; ai , f at 3 d WW. .: hes | Oe 4 z mn Jens - ; , ‘ F ae Seeeees | eae : ~ ' = ” = ' - 4 Ae f—§_ ; : S a. ; ' ! 4 i. : i 0 > ae Tee oh Law ; ‘ : B 7 ; : ' ; 3 < : " 2: ! ' : ~ S ' i oo i i t — i y% 5 7 - = - es a es a OP Cee Gt 4 4 ae ee S —-s~e----- j ' n ' i ' ! = 3 i : Ss filly ! i i S ! ' j ® i i © Mileage, Se a ae > i ; t BY ‘ ' oi t + 2 i ’ 2 i ' j ' _ ' ; : i t = ' i . — | ! Ay ps a eed ae ts) | Bees “fH. fe AK ' s : : ; > ~~ | chitown Se oonmeaaommen a ! i —_ i ~ ° ue Pie eet | | eee : : i — C ' ' ' 3 ' i 4 Sheriff AA, oe et | } gehts fe ) my 7 i} Se S| 4 . i — i ; ; : x ; cS ’ ! ae A =. oS. SS es} | ee === 5S fF PP Pp * ; Plaintiff’s Attorney. . EF e 26} 3 4 e = > = 4 5 = ee Beaver, Florence F. vs. Beaver, Robert 1920 Pats ae a oe SE a Rt tr mena AN ARAL AR. dee Ca Ce 4 ue AS aS RPO a8 Ree RPO AIR EON u snore nh eneeReRM eRe North Carolina, : In the superior Court- Tredell County, : July Term-1919. Florence Freeland Beaver,minor — : by her next of friend,W.S,Freeland : vs, : Order appointing Next of Friend, Robert Beaver,minor and his : Guardian Ad litem,J.W.Beaver 3 It appearing from the sworn application in this cause that Florence Freeland Beaver is a minor,without penoral or testamentary guv’adian and that she desires to bring an action against her husband for diverce on the ground of adultry and W.S.Freeland,her father ep aaa having come into court and signified his willingness to act as next : of friend for the said minor: It is therefore ordered that ¥.S.Frebland | be and he is hereby appointed next of friend for the said minor to ; bring an action agaisnt Robert Beaver for divorce on ihe rround of eerie Guha Pec ee> ° syne Superior Court, July 7,1919. aed poqoy “IsARag ‘SA “J 20UDdJO].4 “JOAROg WW Oo oO = & = < Qo oO se Ti oS g 2 S as o “Ti < y North Carolina, : In the Superior Court~ Iredell County, : July Term-1919, Florence Freeland Beaver,minor by her next of friend 7.S.Freeland vs, Order Appointing Guardian Ad Litem Robert Beaver,minor and his Guardian ad litem,J.W.Beaver It appearing from the sorn complaint and application inthtes cause that Robert Beaver,the defendant 41s a minor without renerel or testamentary guardian and that the said minor is a necessary party to this action,and J.W.Beaver,brother of the defendant is willing to act as guardian ad litem,it is ordered that J.W.Beaver,be and he is hereby appointed ruardian ad litem for the infant defendant, Robert Seaver in this action,and is authorized and directed to appear and defend the same on his behalf,as such geuardian, July 7,1919. oO o roe < o Ss x ° % a Ww oO $9 < oO ” ri) ° 3 oO > o oO "Tj < ¥ 0c6l ww o @ fo & =— < Go ~~. ae "t1 oS we 2 Sg a8 o “TI < 9d = Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-'07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF...... Pa het * County--GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON |... UA a err the Court House ig... A A on the... 2s i. ‘S next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of... = Defendant... -And this you shall in-no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. PEs Nanas Secchi hone neces chore es AMIR aoota bee eee a eat oe ca ee ee ,; Clerk of our said Court, at office ene ey 90 /F 22 on *4/7 70 ob nar 0 poi Laqoy “IsAveg ‘SA “4 DOUDIO} J “JOAROG 076! yy Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-'07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, TO THE SHERIFF OF Biscuits. y.. COUNTY--GREETING: OU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMM ! T Z next, then and there to testify and the truth to : y in behalf of..../ in a certain controversy before said Court dependin Peete ON oS : Sis is wy oO oO oe & ¢ 2d Oo @ SS 7 65 q A 38 a8 oO "T] < “7 Laqoy “IaAR0g ‘SA *J DOUDIO]J “IDAROG ee FRE NP a Se SUBPOENA--Civil, Gor a Le To Le Bere 190. 3 Rech £2 Peed feno Dwmuenyr BH ods 192.0 ) AW Ok ncaa Dod ba Ax Guilin: Be / | j 6 (8° ae BD @ > < a Ww o & < o ." me ° 3 o 3 © o a < " yaqoy ‘I 0761 Beaver, Florence F. vs. Beaver, Robert 1920 eo Axrec (fe € ry Beaver, Florence F. vs. Beaver, Robert 1920 yagoy “IaARag ‘SA "J DOUDIO} “IOAveg Against | Original Summons, or other original process, including al} mamestherein. ......., . . «$ 1.00 Pewee Be ce Ree RR OOM mle em Ut kee game GS aT Injunction Order, including Bond aud Justification. . . Order of Arrest PR eRe a at ee ag: ete tele a gles le Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian . . ... Continuance Caveat to a Will, entering minke ihe ae = Issuing Commission Judgment Against Notice, for each name over one in same paper. INNIS cg bk, te em he ce Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided . . Judgment final in term time Judgment final before Clerk Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support . ... . . Docketing same Docketing ex parte Proceedings. .........., . Judgment Summons Bie MR er Ee gla ks Re Bek is +25]. EN a lo aa ote -10 RII Sn ii a ee oe 10 Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . Copy sheets, each.. .10 County Tax, when Jury impareled Referee’s PO {) g fd Transcript of Judgment bie wel wore hla pint Sen S002 Wb Execution and Sheriff’s Return. ............, -50 Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00]] _ CIVIL DOCKET. ee BILL OF COSTS--CIVIL, (As Fixed by the Code.) ee Beaver, Florence F. vs. Beaver, Robert 1920 wo Se, < & e r* vl6! ‘SAT “© ‘TPE SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. Stare of North Capolina, Z To the Sheriff of Sua atse 7 County-—-GREETING : Dou are hereby Commanded to gummon................. the defendant ...above named, if... gle: -be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of at the Court House i in T= a tthe on the... b --v-eMonday after the / Monday of bales the same being ‘the ../..3 day of SOL Hany --1G9¢% and answer the complaint, a copy of which will ‘be deposited in the offect es5 Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three days of said Term, and let enhtdebetith Razake notice if the. they fail to answer to the said’ complaint Within that time, the plaintiff will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due: return. Y Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this...../¢—. of .. S@k 19.452 LL VLA 1, AA fabed., — 77-JO yAN0D sonadng 243 jo non aiquammyey 131130401 SHOWWAS “Taney Pg ‘SA “TE ‘TPG " ER 5 A > | vl6l “""—S1N} OMIM aOJaq peqiiosqns pue 0} WI0MSG *SUOT}NDeX2 wI0Iy ydmexe Ayradoid pue sarjyiqer] ‘syqep siq sAoge pue 1aA0 SI¥][Op pexpuny OM} Jo wns ay} YOM st aq SXes TOMS Zu1aq (qeag) se oie (‘easg) pvececcsvecssnseces “yo Awp “SIq} ‘sjeas pue spaeq ino ssonzI My HHUrelg 243 Jo s9A0001 Avem JUBPUIZIG Pq} SB 3S09 “BHP, 249 Ff aaamoy jaepurjeq 24} OFAN pUNnog sedjosino aBpa;MouyIe 944 ‘Ayanod *‘ynod Jopedng 343 UY \ *¥NITIONYD HLNON SO SDLY¥LS wo ‘ KS & —_ 3 f vi6l ‘SA "TE TP Fisk — Zee «. Hh — dey of tray 112, eo i lain of! Aovihe Bare linc, 4 eS a as a KasabeanD uD conife, bas. ez b jai mil, Maks a dit diicd of & Leite of Porsh YE Crrconentiorsck of Chap @.0Zin/, one Pat minh tracerep. oforract Andriy L- 2halene V3, aT tnd Meer Kh Kama off he fleain GY, 4: Lereractny Annoy | and oh Pew tse Fe fail ff Armd erren/ p> ee B plain Gf tor ri trbinm loniby toh tAL eR Fe Fife Tok, Dreice he Goan D of Be 60h of adtubhry ofenneh. : ba awetetee) andeha K. be grant’ a FhniS ff, a we “y Conn HPL aa Ou bu CR back of-ber A, Gal ht Duh Cm palact 9 Het rade fof ow of Mavihy om by Coetuasioms Gelonitins fore Sth aiffamdn Beisel Sed. fin Bh, On felet, an! hee Te fore a4 fh 3 ke: GE Cup hans, 41 Grenntn fire Meine, Kom noe a ICL Meer tape AT vet tsp tremithe forrve Ftp of % Comet homh and hae Ki teat Ata tec eect Ze q i 2 aS Ge et. ge aor a es fw i, ie aeet Si toh. fore eunsomy A plain ff to Cngfoterk, i t : ) ' lot, Beh, rh ven & LY me Me re— 1943 DB vy. (Brice y, (fo HI f Verh, @ MAAK MI Can h. Voip y Cloak Srfaen 52 Our “Tey Td SA *T'€ TP rlél apo LOVI~H VE Vb lulYr Yt SPU IM SOD GE. Bell, B. L. vs. Bell, Mattie L. & ARE Ea Ris ORE retake (ee /| Art + Ae ee cit | ae An he bust % pres ba il a SG. Ye ee Bitten gah os of Oe Lk Le lof Merk Howcelicna frm & feccenk of Leow es fm P10 lia 6h, ferremdory Ze Qeecrecenteraf of thse ee ae Ahr & & =< Ww Sm Oo < re” vI6l J3 AczL eh fhe thy, Zrrat acct Dance ga, Grecotel Aide, trtk B.A, Phow Aris hae 7 ' : : ; i ' ; ; fs i ; f f Bell, B. L. vs. Bell, Mattie L. 1914 Ora EN Ne Oe rame mre er : : ® Civil Subpoena,—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—5—,04, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, | Counry--GREETING; , next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of... 4 in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein a re Oo oo =< w& St © < re , Clerk of our said Court, at office in my cos Monday after thé... Monday in vI6l NI I i iat Si tne Sane i i i ee = & ar ms rlél Bill of Coste—Civil.—Printed and for sale by Brady, ‘The Printer, Statesville, N. C. - Sash Bond, inclyding Justification IN THE SUPERIOR COURT. Beye ea tn Judgment Against PE z<w © = i oO < er vI6l j Transcript of Judgment ltcmeention Sheriff’s Return Appeal to Supreme Court, including Certificate and Seal 2.00}] ___ | ‘Transcript to Supreme Court. . . . copy sheets, each. County Tax, when Jury impaneled | Referee's Allo CIVIL DOCKET. BILL OF GOSTS--CIVIL (As Fixed by the Code. lagi 4 . Bieiedt eoctas u 3 3 2 ~ ~ = 2 ~ Bell, B. L. vs. Bell, Mattie L. 1914