Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRailroad Records 1911 tesville, N. C. 6-9-'09-1M. ..County.-~ Gn the Superior Court. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North. Carolina. To the Sheriff of fe. ote County--GREETING: Dou are hereby COMMANDED to summon. enw | Veh eceeaweeetot ce ewwcseidonnsass teres assecesooedvecasscasccsshencandnndobeacnsccsnsecoscccsses ces cceccccnencecscecreccecccccoescesscncccncesccoscencecscccssres coecceccscencecceccecccoce which’ will ‘be deposited i in the office ofthe Clerk of the Superior Court for said County, within the first three’ days }of said: ‘term, and’let said Defendant.......... take notice if.. ifm fail to answer to the said complaint’ within that time, the plaintiff::.....will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this. ¥ rv ae ie . ¥ Bia hea de sity senha, wisp ae sii STATE PF NORTH CAROLINA, \ In the Superior Court. Dollars, to be void, however, if the Plaintiff Dewthern hebrro, arn G om. shall pay the Defendant.........-.all sifch a Plaintiffs Attorney. North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1911. Southern Railway Company oe COMPLAINT. The Bank of China Grove and J.N. Cater. The plaintiff complains and says: - --First-- That it is a corporation duly and originally created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Virginia, That its lines of Railway extend through the States of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and other States, within each of which States, particularly at Statesville, in Iredell County, N.C., for the proper operation and carrying on its business, it has freight and passenger stations, where it receives and ships freight and passengers, for hire, receiving therefor its freight and passenger charges. -~-Second--— That the Bank of China Grove, is a corporation ,duly organized and existing under, and by virtue of , the {ews of the State of North Carolina, where it is engaged in a general Bank- ing Business loaning money and receiving money on deposit. --Third-- That on the 3rd day of March, 1909 , the defendant J.N. Carter, was the agent of the plaintiff at Kannapolis, where he received and delivered freight and collected the charges there- fér, and while such agent at Kannapolis ,N.C., on said date, in payment of freight due the plaintiff by T.C. Thompson & Bro., received one check, drawn by 1.C. Thompson & Bro., to J.3. Cater, Agent,for $355.55; on March 20th,1909, as agent of South- ern Railway Company, received from T.C. Thompson & Bro-, one chegék for $72.54 in payment of "freight, Kannapolis, week ending : oldies ~@ 3/20/09"; on April 3rd, 1909, as agent of Southern Railway Company, received from T.C. Thompson & Bro., oheok for $125.64,"freight ‘at Kannapolis, N.C., week ending 4/2/09"; on April lst, 1909, received a check from Patterson Young Mercantile Company for $8.41, in payment of freight due by said Company to plaintiffl on April 2, 1909, received one check drawn by Patterson Young Mercantile Company, in payment of freight for $29.00; on April 2,1909, received one check drawn by Patterson Young Mercantile Company in payment of freight amounting to $43.66; all of which checks , and the proceeds thereof, were | the property of Southern Railway Company, and were paid to said Cater for freight charges, which Southern Raiiway Company held against the drawers of said described checks. -~Bourth-- That the defendant, The Bank of China Grove, knew before, on and after said above nemed dates, that J.N. Cater, was the Agent of the plaintiff, Southern Railway Company, at Kannapolis, H.C., and that all money collected by him 13 -yeeoat of freight | outgoing and incoming , together with all passenger ticket revenue, belonging to, and was the property of Southern Railway Company. ~-Fifth-- That notwithstanding the defendant »The Bank of China Grove, knew that all of said checks and the proceeds thereof were the property of Southern Railway Company; said Bank in violation of its duty ,when said checks were offered for deposit in said Bank, by said Cater, Agent of Southern Railway Company, unlawfully and wrongfully placed the proceeds thereof to the in- @ividual account of said J.N. Cater, instead of to his ac- count as agent of Southern Railway Company, as was its duty to do, and as the checks themselves informed it, it should do, confused said money and converted the same and thereby q aided and participated in the breach of trust of said Cater. ~--Sixth-- That thereafter, and while said money deposited as aforesaid to the individual account of the said J.N. Cater, was in the care and control of the defendant Bank, said Bank unlawfully and wrongfully per,itted the said J.N. Cater, to withdraw all of said money so deposited, known to said Bank ot be the property of said Southern Railway Company, on his personal check, thereby aiding and participating in his breach of trust, appropriate the same to his own use and misapply the same to the great damage of Southern Railway Company, plaintiff in this action $634.80, and interest thereon. --Seventh-- That prior to the institution of this action, the plaintiff made demand upon the defendant The Bank of China Grove, for re-stitution of and payment to it of the amounts of the above named checks, because it wrongfully placed the proceeds thereof to J... Caterts individual account, instead of to his account, as trustee, and thereby aided and participated in his breach of trust. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands judgment against the defendant, The Bank of China Grove, for the sum of Six Hundred Thirty Four & 80/100--Dollars, the proceeds of the checks above set forth, which were deposited by said Cater, and which were improperly and wrongfully placed to the credit of said Cater?s individual account, and not to his account as trustee; for the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, and for such other and further relief, as may be just and right. ounse or aintiff. North Carolina Iredell County VM Onsen » being duly sworn ,deposes and says, that he is the loca} agent of the Southern Railway Company , at Statesville,N.C., that he has read the foregoing Complaint, and that the same is true of his own knowledge, ex- cept as to matters and things stated therein upon information and Sworn to and s ibed to before me this the Z day of I. ce North Carolina , Superior Court Iredell County seas d Term, Toit. Southern Railway Company Kotion vs for Removal The Bank of China Grove to Rowan County and J. N. Cater cle aato aa The defendant, the Bank of China rare; no ee the Court to remove this cause for trial to the Superior Court of Rowan bounty, for that:- The plaintiff, the Southern nailway company, is a foreign borporation incorporated under the laws of the state of Vir- Binia, and is not a resident of Iredell county nor of this state. That neither of the defendants are, or were at the commence- ment of this action, residents of the county of lredell. That the defendant the Bank of China Grove is a domestic porporation incorporated der the a of North arolina, b *P P ets li~ 7 ae ee “PIB > y Bhapter 399 Private paws of 1908, wich 1s asked to be taken as pe partphereof as fully as if written herein, and that its home pffice and only place of business is at China Grove, in Rowan pounty, the same being #@ specified and fixed in its said charter . T The said defendant the Bank of China Grove as additional pause for removal, for the convenience of witnesses, the ends tw a0 Df justice, and that a fair trial may be had, moves the court fo remove said cause to Rowan County for trial, for that:- That defendants’ bank and only place of business is located t China Grove in Rowan County, only nine thiles from eros A With which it is in direct and frequent communication by rail- road, wire and telephone; that all the books and records of —_ defendant bank are at China Grove in said Rowan County, and could be mach more conveniently and safely taken to Salis- bury for purposes of the trial than to Statesville. That W. C. Sifferd is the cashier and only active local offi- pial of said bank, residing at China Grove in said county of Rowan, in entire charge of its business, and a material witness | for defendants, and to require him to attend at Iredell Superior | H ourt for the trial of this cemse would be in effect to shut pown the business of the defendant bank during his absence, 4. z #2 and would prove of great damage to its interests, and be a great inconvenience to its patrons. That said W. Cc. Sifferd is a necessary and mater ial witness for said defendant, and that the books and records of said pank are necessary and material to its defense. That all the witnesses. for defendants léve in Rowan County, and so do the witnesses for plaintif?, or most of them, as de- fendant is informed and believes, and all said witnesses could much more conveniently and cheaply attend the trial of said cause at Salisbury, as they would have to pass through that place ed travel twenty-five miies further to rsaeh Statesville, the county seat o” Iredell county C886. Uele- Hk, ® Naa y Attorneys for Defendant. W. C. Siffergd being duly sworn says that he is cashier of defendant Bank of China Grove, that he has read the fore- going motion, and that the same is true to his own khowledge, except as to matters and things therein alleged on infomation and belief and as to those he jelieves it to be true, Svorn and subscrived befora ine this the 3Iday of I9II. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires . Yi gpel9 ll goo One, wher Ll be Ba Lf 7 mew 4 Bat aipintyel Beat, ate te agent tet tee a " a uy Bill of Costs.—Civil.—Prirted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. Original Summons, or other original process, including all I NR accel ccscanraa cao capcadacoceccccousscescccceres geeneane $1.00 Every copy of same..... ........cccsccccsssscesecsesecesese sense Snasaiecusebonsentes .25 Bond, including Justification.................00... sf xeeanbascaisneaensieiveosve .60 PADPOGL THOU SS GION Senccee ces cncccees cares ev ceceseconesesvaccesscessesecesreescee 50 Appeal from Clerk tO 50d g6.-c.-..--c0ccecceccs-c-cesonss-: enssssecescacecsceseses -50 Order for enlarging time of pleading.................. csscsee seseesseeseeee -25 Puterioeat ory Orderescc.cscccsssscocesecesssssel cescseresecsecosesssvsessenceeseorce .25 itiachment, Orderiin erecsrsesscesrstese pacetetecatceseacel Mtcaneesserevtccestesetes 50 njunction Order, including Bond and and Justification..... ..... 1.00 OT OL CATVORU ir ccrscosesecorestrcarelocrecensecesesecieceesesteticreseeaserseresesnees 1.00 na,“each TIAWING, occcccecessccsces escsarcesces) cess sersececsecesccesescose ocssee 15 Notifying Solicitor of Removal of Guardian. .. ..........2:scseeseeeee 1.00 Continuance.. ........... spscascasseccestececseccuster cececaiccceneceresseurecsavarestasee .80 : Caveat to a Pill, entering and docketipg.. ‘ , Affidavit, including Jurat and Certificate....... .......00...cessceeeeeseee Sheen) rae -ccccrcoccerssstscec¢coesescccsectersceasers) ceseresvaretccaseccnsensecen|essecelestroees 25 Motion, Entry and Record Of..... ......-.csssecsece cessesseees ces seseeeeeees -25 INOUICO sronclesscclsacscnstcasecensseeteaticscecel eereenstensereccatrersessacenertess Pesreess io aa = Notice, for each name over One in BAMEe PAPEF...... ........e0eeceeeeee _ 10 ; 2 Impaneling DOTY crc cicceccerereccccrcerel coceneecterereceeterenseceee eceerinecenttiees 10 Judgment Against Justification of Sureties, except as otherwise provided ............. 50 Judgment final in term time .................:cc00e cesecsceeeeeeseees cesseeeeece 1.00 Judgment final before Clerk...... Riascascaccccececteradeccancetsececemneetennetete .50 Judgment in favor of Widow’s Year’s Support...........00. sess cesses .50 ee Dock eting 66 Mi :s.s21-..0cccc cceses sssscecsceeceesiccsssccceces) scevcececsesceses! eres, c2O Docketing ex parte Proceedings... .... ..... . siaesvevescee! cesstecevereeséce .50 - SUGMMENG cc. --occesccsesecsessosseossscsssccscsorscsersiacseecnesteeeeetiece -25 “ SQMMONG ....2cccceceessccesess ee Javesssceserssces)aceesessccceccssesteccseser Indexing Judgment Filing Papers............ Usecenaaccesescesereeees (ese Postage, MOCUAL.. <0... 0000 cccssvccsccsesee coccocsssccer soones’ ccoseccscsecnsaccocceee ° e $6 " SOD COOCEEEEEEES SOPSTEEEEEE COOH EEHEEE RGEC CO HEEE e+ EEE seeeeee Of Defendant’s Witnesses... ............c.csecee cesssccreeenes be cheese csevertevesesrson nace a é Oe: Sasee. saccacuceses Ubsousccsbesecectes eoesccevececses cseeacecces oatioe a WS Wi ccacceneed ce res cucvereveSsececeeseneneuceceteerscieserecedmearine 66 We ices sesee snccecence PORTE E ESET OEEEEEO HEHEHE He +e BERR OR EEE Ee oe Oe: senus’ acecevevacer ounce lesvedeSispecevecccescoes cacecs coeeececs ‘ es We aceseleces erceves sesetcevetce ceecensers cececrceeeceiicts eee se Ne ecccce vers carcecdocececetaree lncoeraccenen etiverenstine ee reeee 4 " ° « “te (*apoD 243 4g pexy sy) “TIAD-S1S0) 40 TIId MWe AE ty aa ety Vee Railroad Records 1911 SUMMONS FOR RELIEF .—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. 6-9-'09-1M, Si Iredell... County.~~ In the Superior Court. cniprsinieomess Bee MCAU OY mmm AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. ee Statesville Air Line Raitroad Com- _ seve UY ccesesssentntnsesneentntntnensnenenenee - , ee seen | Sees ; sooo - as . . , . i 3 C . Fi i State of Nortb'Carolin na, = Be | i oad = ra, = tf = i : ITo the Sheriff of Ire dete: coe Sonal co - County GREETING: fo Ef 7 Wou are bereby Comiianded to upmon.. se ! Lf a : -Statenvidie Air Line Railrosa Company | i : i oe = , o tT - moo a = i? i iy er | fh enn i fo a “| I 3 1 oe nc f i ee i >, I “f ~~ +] : b=] 8 i Rll. Sac pct ican mn ie Pr OTT EE TRY OTT PEAT ee POLOLG TIME -f fa re - Sadieseceseeesses ws oseseneveere tres tieseeesen caters s2hggye OLCL SEG SpOne Wi Se pte’ Upc s wi lo obo CxeMmbe pom execs (oi: “pom amout esha po ra morgp ope cum OF {nO pongieg qoywie “ (eesy) the defendant....above named, if..4%...... be found within your - County, to be and appear before the a of our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County Of ened FOAL. « sic so he scsat at the Court ead? in Stakerevs Ler eng: on the 8th eieidl the. 1st. ~ Mondayfofl Ses tainber a CHE tsiithe belity® tHe BOG ay EOC OCB oS) $4 FGManswer the complaint, a copy of whieh’ SHILKE GepeEreed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Cottt' fur /shhd Mom iep? thin the firstithrey dugstef cmigh Merit aug thet eetid: Defendatnti:..o,take iotice if... Addy fail to answer to theygaid popsphaing Withip, thahtime dite: plaintifica.pawill apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint... --- ~~... - Hereof fail-not, and of this sammons make due return. > Given under:my hand and seal of said Court, this. ese oe day of ()... epotember— Tot } ° : t - 4 YOVINeL , BOUD i Couns - 2 ‘ ]¥ pe Qubcrio Come 2i¥ LB OLMOKLH CYKOPIAY | STATB 3 NORTH CAROLINA, } In the Superior Court. County. Seeew eee cone cere sen eneneeOe serene heewennmereeeeseees emwecnsere: OFFICE COPY NG23 0 cost ‘as the’ Defendant:..°:: = may recover of the Plaintiff... .in this Action. > Withess Oifhands and seals, this... /. 0... day tet hfe oo) OBS Dg Zoos oo PERM, (6.2-— tens SO AGAINST Statesville Air Line Railroad. a SUMMONS FOR RELIEF, . = = R. _MeAuley 2... -Ausley;See.-&-Breas;-of-the eC. Caldwell. Company ~ eeeeces. Statésviile sir Nine KNaitroad of the Superior Court of..17e@4e11 County. Sept. 4, By. delivering. copy..to..D.M...... Served Returnable to. October. 4 { } } { Plaintiff's Attorney. North Carolina In the Superior Court. Iredell County November Term,1911. E.l.. McAuley,Plaintiff. Statesville,Air Line Railroad, Defendant. The plaintiff complains and says: -~-First-- That he is a citizen and resident of Iredell County, State of North Cerolina, and has been for many years; That he is engaged as a farmer, in the cultivation of the soil; that he is the owner and in possession of, the following described tract of land, in said County, about five miles from the City of Statesville, described and defined as follows: Beginning at the junction of Jonesville and Turnersburg Road running with the Turnersburg Road North 77 East 22 poles and North 68 East 45 poles to a stone where the East Branch crosses the road; thence up the said branch North 11 poles and North 20 East 16 poles to a poplar and North 11 East 15 poles to a small White Oak on the East side of the Branch in Howard's line; thence North 88 West 44-1/2 poles to Center of Jonesville Road; thence with the Center of said raxd-South 1 West101 poles to the-beginning, —-Contetning 30-1/2 acres more or 1068. See Deed of M.G. Morrison and wife and others, Book 31, page 549. --Second-- That the defendant, is a corporation, duly created organized, and existing under, and by virtue of the laws of hin the State of North Carolina, end is now engaged in the con- struction of its road bed, fran Statesville is a Northerly direction; that between the first day of November,1910, and before the issuing of this summons, did unlawfully and wilfully enter upon, unlawfully ,wilfully and negligently begin the construction of, and is now constructing its road bed over, “Hd across the above described tract of land of the plaintiff, against his will and without his permission. --Third-- That after the wilful and unlawful location by the sur- veyor of its line of railroad across and over the lands | of the plaintiff, the defendant without having secured a right of way, by condemnation ,gift or purchase, or in any wise agreeing or contracting with him for the land, wilfully and unlawfully entered upon and appropriated the lands of the plaintiff, destroyed the timber, did and committed acts of spoliation, and began erecting or constructing its line of railroad; that said line of railroad enters the lands of the plaintiff from the South side at or about the intersection of the Jonesville and Turnersburg road, and cuts across and through the abowe tract of land, towards the Northern boundary, quite a distance. That the field, through which said railroad is being constructed, lies in the intersection od the two public roads above, with a beautiful \mo11 thereon for building purposé6s, sloping gradually to the East,South and West; that said defendant entered said field with its line of railroad construction and has cut across said field along and wide cut, some 18 or 20 feet in width at the top, “which cut will “gradually cave in, “thereby cosuming ndx6’ OF Re plaintiff's land; the fill following thereafter, going North q ward is of quite a height, thereby rendering baid fiela of land undesirable for puilding purposes, unattractive and depreciated in value, outting it in two sections,with all the inconveniences incident to a deep cut and high fill across said field. That the seid railroad bed was carelessly and negligently located without due regard to plaintiff's rights and preservation of his property; that because of the negligence of location and construction of said road bed, together with the numerous damages, such as the destruction of timber, washing of the plaintiff's land; the destruction of the site thereon for building purposes, the inexcessibility of his said field, one part to the other, Baa ctie continuation thereof, has caused this plaintiff to suffer damages in the sum of One Thousand Dollars. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands Judgment against the defendant for One Thousand Dollars, for. the unlawful and wilful entering upon and appropriating the lands of the . plaintiff to its use without permi bsion or authority, for the improper and negligent location and construction of said railroad, and for the damages suffered by him, for the cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, and for such other and further relief, as may be just and re ert. L¢ “a Attorney for piney — E.R. McAuley,being duly sworn, /deposes and says: that he is the plaintiff in the foregoing action, that the foregoing Complaint is true of his own knowledge, except as to the matters and things stated therein upon information and belief, and as to those he py it to be true. C DO phe Des heg Sworn to and subscribed. before 14 8 we of OctH#ber,1911, Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. §-15-'07-3M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Lrreotsttl County--GREETING: ov personally to appeat before the Judge of Supetior Court, at the next Court to be held for out said county at Defendant And this you shall in no wise otnit, undet the penalty prescribed by law: WITNESS, ......-5- A. Nach wee eleuperosiegreceniettee gi cease anes ebiieierae , Clerk of our said Coutt, at office v Monday oo, ft tk Ke, Plaintiff ee intron a. i a ee _ ~ a ee ae te wp meals Aagtfieermentrte Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. §-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF oe audeltl_—, County--GREET YOU ARE H Y COMMANDED TO SUMMON . My eee he tee Defendant tT SUBPOENA--Civil, TELK, Mb } : Aaa... nnn a ~ . North Soret ene In the Superior Court. Iredell County. ) November Term, 1911. E. R. McAuley, -Va- Statesville Air Line Railroad Co, The defendant answering the plaintiff's oon- plaint alleges and says: * First: That it admits paragraph first of said compiaint. Second: That in answer to allegations con- tained in paragraph second, the defendant denies each and every allegation therein alleged, except it admits, that it isa ooxrporation duly created, organized and existing poarine the laws of the State of Ban Aeseren, that it is engaged in the construction of a road bed from Statesville in a Northerly direction, which road bed crosses-a part of the lends of the plaintiff. Third; That in answer to the allegations contained in the third paragraph of said complaint, the defendant de- nies each and every allegation therein alleged, except -it | admits that it ie constructing a road bed across a part of the lands described in the plaintiff's complaint. nia further. answering said complaint the defendant i alleges, that in the construction of its road bed acrose the | lands of the plaintiff the same was done lawfully, carefully and scientifically with due regard to the rights of the plain- tare, and with the least injury possible to hts land, and has endeavored amicably to compensate the plaintiff for its right of Way across said land, and adjust any damages , he may have sustained, if any, to the land: and failing in this, if he | has suffered any danges, Which it denies, he has his remedy as provided by law. WHEREFORE it demands that it go without day AD Leven Attorney for Defendant. and recover the cost of the action. Railroad Records 1911 j f Smt SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.—Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. 6-9-’09-1M. =—_ — ——— ue sine EE ec ceigd aed County.~- In the Superior Court. ABs FOPMOM mene AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. wae Statesville Air Line Railroad Co. State of North’€arolina, A af To the Sheriff of Jzade el County—GREETING: i : Wou are hereby Comisanded to: sutnmon ed eee i | Statesville Air Line Railroad Company |; i : - | | i peteseeranenesersatsceateenegerer ee teeeeenT eT Toe a +. seseees + 4h "6 i Lhe ae: : li | ssn fpr Ei Galen 2 { 3 ~ + | iH i 53 ! i l i 3 Scsseeseoousnrsnstdivoervereunsestesieseeteoness estniaiens Bs oriestincscacereroeecfien onserasenseeneesnssoennensis i! { iy°s the defendant ....above named, if.....it.....be found within your County, to be and appear before the Judge a our Superior Court, at a Court to be held for the County of............ Iredell... at the Court House i in .. SVBROBV ATE on ‘the!!!’ Bth Monday‘ after the....... lst _—— Monday ‘of... September. the sathé-being the “SOth day of OF OOfeber 0! 2 G21 Gnd answer the com piaist a copy of whith’ Will ‘be’ deposited in the-office of the @lerk-of the Superior Court for said’ County, svithyn the first thrée ‘days of:said’‘Tetm, and tet said Defendant.) take notice if.>..it:...&ideySfail to answer to the said’ complaint withiy that time, the: plaintiff........will apply to the Couirt for, the peliet demanded i in the complaint, _ ‘.§&-e—- - Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return, eeTALN _BOND Couns } v 4 : Ya (yc 2LYLE OF YOK LH CyYHORrMY ! enbcuo. tony STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, \ In the Superior Court. We acknowledge ourselves bound unto the Defendant.......in this action, in the sum ae FRAO however, if the Plaintiff......... cost as the Defendant.............. may recover of thé Plaintiff... in this action. Witness our hands and seals, this........... Fs day of... woe meee ern e ewe n ween memes ence eeernees semeeaaceseeessesceesaeenanectesse Beeeseeeresteeneseeee being sworn says he is worth the sum of two hundred dollars over and above his debts, liabilities and property exempt from executions. Sworn to and subscribed before me this... day of.. . 19. Ce ee ear ecwennerercencveneeesenawsseseesees rere k Gpeeee wvoeeee 1Q-F-T “of the | SUMMONS FOR RELIEF, Plaintiff's Attorney. Line Railroad. eeqeeeress cccccscccccccercs ceccccccccccocccenccccccesccqococcocecccccoccccs ~~ Ceiipany “& Treas. n AGAINST __ Statesville Air Line Rail- Sec. __road Company. OFFICE COPY. No.___. . _A-B. Harmo on of the Superior Court of Lredell. County. “By delivering copy to Dims tatesville Air 1 5 We Ce... Cal dwe 1] “Ausley Retumable to....0ct»... ~¢ —~ North Carolina .- In the Superior Court Iredell County November Term ,1911. A.B. Harmon,Plaintiff, --V8-- COMPLAINT. Statesville Air Line Railroad, Defendant. The plaintiff complains and says: - --First-- That he is a resident of the County of Iredell, and State of North Carolina; and lives about 4-1/2 miles from the City of Statesville, where he is engaged in the cultivation of the soil as a farmer. That he is the owner, and in pos- session of, the following described tract of land situated in said County and State aforesaid. Beginning at a stake on the West side of Turnersburg Road in the Southern Line of the Wiley M. Harmon tract of land; thence in a Northerly direction with the Turnersburg Road; thence in a Westernly direction running parallel with the Southern boundary line of the said Wiley M. Harmon tract - of land 177 feet to a stake; thence in a Southerly direction running parallel with the said Turnersburg Road 490 feet to @ stake in the line of the Wiley M. Harmon tract of land: thence in a Easterly direction with the Southern boundary line of. the said Wiley M. Harmon tract of land 177 feet to the be- ginning. Containing 2 acres more or less. See Deed Book 40, page 415. First Tract: Beginning at a White Oak Adderholt's and Harmon's corner; thence South 89 East 70 poles to a stone; on the East side of the public road; thence North 42 East 20 poles to a stone on the East side of said road; theme North 55-1/q West 55 poles to a stone near branch; thence nh South 40 East 55 poles to the beginning. Containing 13 acres more or less. Second Tract. Beginning at a stake Holland's corner, in Houpe's line running North 124 poles to a stone, | Morrison's line; thence North 87 West 78 poles to ea spanish oak, thence Worth 79 West 63 poles to a stone; thence South 41 West 20 poles to a stone on the public road; thence North 88 West 66 poles to a white oak, Adderholt's corner; thence South 1 East 30 poles to the Black oak, Hol- land's corner; thence South 60-1/2 East 82 poles to a Post Oak; thence South 68 East 150-1/2 poles to the beginning. Containing 11] acres more or less, except about two acres conveyed a8 appears in Book 40, page 415, for description of the last two described tracts of land See Book 41, page 37. --Second-- That the defendant is ea corporation duly created, organized and existing,under , and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Carolina; is now engaged in the construction of its road bed, from said City of Statesville, north through the County of Iredell, to the town,of Mt Airy in North Csrolina; | that between the first day of November, 1910, and before the issuing of this summons the defendant, unlawfully and ‘wilfully entered upon and surveyed a railroad route ana afterwards unlawfully, wilfully and negligently began the constructions of and is now constructing its road bed over and across the above described tracts of land, the property of the plaintiff. Me --Third-- That after the wilful and unlawful. location of its line of railroad as aforesaid, over and across the lands of the plaintiff, which location, as plaintiff is informed and be- a lieves, was negligently done, i11 advised ,and not where it Should have been,the defendant without having secured a right of way, by condemnation ,gift or purchase, or in any Wise agreeing or contracting h the plaintiff for his lands, Over which said railroad was located, has been and is being constructed, the said defendant wijfully, and unlawfully entered upon and appropriated the lands, destroyed the timber, committed acts of damage and began erecting its line af railroad; that said line of railroad enters the land of the plaintiff from the south side on a Sloping hillside, and cuts across, in a northerly direction, his fields of. land to & great distance, by means of cuts, fills and other means, in the construction of its road bed. That said road bed, so Situated, is now Causing and will continue to cause the lana above, on the West side of said road bed, to be damaged by its drains or ditches » by the leaching of the land into cuts ana under the fills thereof, thereby rendering all said land outside of the Right of Way actually being used by the defendant ,of little value, That defendant carelessly and negligently placed culverts or pipes under its said road bed at various places, for the burpose of gathering , into concentrated force and place, the water from the high ground, conducting it through said pipes or culverts under said road bed and turn it loose on the lower land on the East side of said road bed, which water when so negligent - ly turned loose will wash Plaintiff's land in gulleys and ditches, SO that said land will be unprofitable for cultivation, dimin- ished in value, lese easily tultivated and drained of its sub- Stance, That because of the location of said road bed the Plaintiff will be cut off from his fieldg one from the other, * and be utterly unable to pass from one field to the other, Save only at some pretended crossing, ill constructed and more illy preserved ana kept in order by the defendant, thereby on Bus rendering the same always dangerous upon his farm and likely to bring about destruction of life and property, all to the plaintiff's damage in the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands Judgment ageinst the defendant for the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars damages, for the. cost of the action to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court, and for such other and further relief, as may be just CC Attorney for the Plaintiff. and right. A.B. Harmon, being duly sworn, deposes and says, that the foregoing Complaint is true of his own knowledge, except as to matters and things stated therein upon information and belief, and as to those he believes it to be true. Sworn to and subscribed before me this the ---,day of North eee | In the Superior Court. Iredell County. ) November Term, 1911. A. B. Harmon, ) | -vs- nos? . ANSWER. ) Statesville Air Line Railroad Co. The defendant answering the plaintiff's complaint alleges and says: First: That it admits the allegations con- tained in the first paragraph. Second: That in answer to allegations con- tained in the second paragraph, it denies each and every allegation therein set forth, except it admits"that the defendant is a corporation duly created, organized and. existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Carolina, and is now engaged in the construction of its road bed from the City of Statesville, North through the County of Iredell to the town of Nount Airy in North Carolina”. Third: That in answer to allegations contained . in the third paragraph of said complaint, it denies each and every allesation therein alleged, except it admits that it had not secured a right of way by condemnation, gift or purchase, but alleces that it failed to do 80 by reason of the unreasonable denanas of the plaintiff; also admits that it constructed its road bed across a part of the lands aforesaid; but alleges that it aia 80 in the exercise of its rights under its charter and under the laws of liorth Carolina, and that the Same was done in a good, workman like and scientific manner. And further answering said complaint the de- fendant slleges,that, in the construction of its road bed across the lands of the plaintiff, the same was done lawfully, carefully and scientifically with due regard to the rights of the plaintiff and with the least injury possible to his land, and has endeavored anicably to com- pensate the plaintiff for its right of way across said eer and adjust any damages, he may have sustained, if any, to the land: and failing in this, if he has sus- tained any damages, Which it denies, he has his remedy as provided by law. WHEREFORE it demands that it go without day and recover the cost of the action. Hh UA Glen Attorney for Defendant. Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Deol County--GREETING: / personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county at the Court House in.....: 2 Dia a sucsstessnscosceceusesonvesssuseresvsctunesibugeeivesiueeteaceeqeosepmussaniberouecssnueseawecs on tee. Vesa : in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein ‘ ~ Plaintiff , and Sholerr lh k tne Defendant............ And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, a SN Te a cases OG se ceases epmaceaios sineseecaneoeavaree , Clerk of our said Court, at office hon Superior Court for eer Plaintiff Against Term, 1966.2. fee PA / 2 | Pt A 972. TES Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF O , County--GREETING: YOU ARE H Y COMMANDED TO SUMMQ 4D fblhecliuntla E Leute Le pwns oe ie Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. cS 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF....... = County--GR ETING: Lee HEREBY ANDE oP “boo Defendant WITNESS, North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County January Term,1912. A.B. Harmon, vs JUDGMENT. Statesville Ajir Line Railroad. This cause coming on to be heard, at this term of the Court, before G.S. Ferguson, Judge, the plaintiff in open Court submits to a non-suit. | . It is, therefore, adjudged that a non-suit be allowed am taken. Cost to be taxed by the Clerk. fe papeator Judge Presiding. : gt #-S/ es 4 te a Railroad Records 1911 = SUMMONS FOR RELIEF.—Judge.— Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. 6-9-’09-1M,. i eee Gipniy =. In the Superior Court. AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of North Carolina, | To the Sheri of Sed eZ’ cosy GREETING: re Hereby Commanded to summon wou ee necewnnneeencneensnerngesaseanereeeeeeseneneas genes sacenenee ee qenees tenereamesneetacseeces caeesgeaescnceccsnenccnccesececccusssescscnccccececacccence sovcecees dhedecrnccrecbevescesessssaccsccnnwcescoebeebesws assesses eecerer sees see esessnsnenneesenerees seen seeebetecsseneresscasnaacngersssssses. seeswesbeceescesesescerece Within. that time, the plaintiff.......will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this LO. 2GAV LE OL VOH LH TIIRO STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, \ In the Superior Court. Secan-oi'epnracre GAMMA AGAINST .Term, 19h:1--~ AGAINST SUMMONS FOR RELIEF, GePeManday of the Superior Court of..Iredel}....County. Southern Railway Co. Returnable to. Jame---------------- No....... a Pe Rept gas — ? t - DSL CL Bape Lhe of Larrccary Pom 19) | bP Beurndus , Ptritereun CL Anke Cowmfa Larcme arelt a Llag Ate: Ek fat th So thire Pactimag Con | any “tg a covtotahon, ek ctr-alicd, | <9 . Anct tye Vinee acecotchng ba Cauk, avo wae, ac Cig eg eee staf LAA At aliegrect, Qrnct Sh ce, a -—| ee eg wea Ae Ct re chy had le tigpiin i" - (abe fart Leatese, tu filoer-, Po corret—_ vo Z oor Bee saan Lae ax phreck ante Lug Sa ae’ ag ahr 6404 ee ez hee chee Coser | tap fe A aut allah. he Ani sag | 2h eclain Be a1cghe aM He Z a Sna2; cOktee- SAH de - North Carolina, In the Superior Court. [redeli County. C.P.Munday Vs. Applieation to sue as a pauper. The Southern Railway Co. fo the honotable clerk of the superior court of [redell County. This is to certify that I> have examined the cause of the plain-’ tiff in the above entitled action,and that He oe @ good cause of Wel babes / action in fact and law. North Carolina, l Iredell: vomnty4 Cf Dea i : 2 a Me hse oo Le <a eboAng duly sworn says;That he is unable to SEE sureties,or make the deposit required by law,to ena- ae the above action against the defendant -------- and that he therefore prays to be allowed to sue in ion as apauper. GC ay North Carolins, In the superior court. Iredell County. 0.P.Munday V8. Order granting leave to sue as a pauper. The Southern Railway Co. In the above entitled action,upon the certificate and affidavit above set forth,it is ordered: lst.That the above named plaintiff<< at aaclipes allowed to prosecute his said action as a pauper. QndeThat -------- nn nn nnn ren ‘be assigned to him as coun sel to prosecute said action. This ths-/J--day- or Wten-r9 (/ - North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County gyanuary Term,1911. C.P. Munday, Southern Railway Company. The defendant answers the Complaint and says: --First-o That it is a corporation duly and originally created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Virginia, was at the time herwimafter mentioned, and is, engaged in operating a line of railroad from Salisbury to Asheville by way of Statesville, in the State of North Carolina, as well as elsewhere. ~-Second-— The defendant has not sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief, as to the truth of the allegations éontained in the second paragraph of the Compleint, and tiereters denies the same. -~-Phird-- It is true that on the 9th day of December, 1910, the de- fendant placed a car on the side track near the Imperial Furniture Company's place of business, for the purpose of being loaded; all other allegations contained in said paragraph are not true and are denied. --Fourth-- That all the allegations contained in the fourth paragraph and the five sub-divisions thereof, are,each, and every one, not true and are denied. For a further answer and defense to plaintiff's cause of action, the defendant says: --First-- That the plaintiff carelessly and negligently contributed to whatever injury he received at said time and place by carelessly and negligently attempting to open the door of the car ~ t Cal while he was standing on a level platform with the floor of the car and the lower end of the door , by carelessly and negligently catching the door thereof and lifting it up, thereby causing the door to be raised free and clear of the rollers above, allowing the rollers to drop out and the door to come down below the usual and customary position upon the rollers. -~Second-- That the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negli- - gence ,in carelessly and negligently attempting to open the door of the car, while he was standing on a level platform with the floor of the car and the lower end of the door, by carelessly and negligently catching the door thereof and lifting it up, thereby causing the door to be raised free and clear of the rollers above, allowing the rollers to drop out and the door to come down below the usual and customary position, upon the rollers. --Third-= In carelessly and negligently failing to pull and slide the door horizontially, whereby it would have remained on the “rollers, but carelessly and negligently lifted said door up and prevented it from rolling horizontially, the rollers thereof dropped out, and the plaintiff's alleged injury occurred. And having fully answered, the defendant asks that it go hence without day. ounse or 6 fendant. B.A. Cowan, being sworn Says, that he is the Local Agent, of the Southern Railway Company, at Statesville,N.C., that he has read the foregoing Answer, and that the Same is true of his own knowl-« edge, except as to matters and things stated therein upon information and belief, and as to those he believes it to be true. Sworn to and subscribed to before me this the -.. Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. . STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ee KLAR... County--GREETING: Y COMMANDED TO SUMMON on CO coco Mn RE IEG og WME: OVP Oh ooovvvvcccceece ee " AE ZL 7 kong el C2 (OOK... before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein... Plaintiff Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF ; Fe nt ORE TING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON Defendant And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, , Clerk of our said Court, at office Clerk Superior Court for... cl, Aellare ana Cac Bez KE iG ses - di fo Gh as Te alk NW ™N ak | ° ¥t A i | j j Yel. | | TS Ls. | Sr | | t | t r a ie ee An S/O Railroad Records 1911 SUMMONS FOR RELIED .—Judge.— —Printed and for sale by Brady, the Printer, Statesville, N. C. 6-9-'09-1M. SUMMONS FOR RELIEF. State of Nogth Carolina, To the Sheriff of hee” County—GREETING : Wou are hereby Commanded to summon... | Cece cccrccce sceceereeensrets ewes ewswwecceseber- ccccccccccscsseccevesscececsccces seeeccncenduns funebachenseres shanesenseneun eneesaneess se nenes passer an nenenensasens reeceanesrmasssceatasreccccscecccccecesescecsccsecees at the Court House in EZ vronday of - LAD Sosa © ccsnverapniiie 19/4 and answer the complaint, a copy of the same. beirig’ the wer day of.............. Dy OS which will be deposited in the office of the Clerk of t pee Court for said County, within the first three - days of said Term, and let said Defendant..........take notice it ot Od ie they, fail, to answer to the said complaint within that time, the plaintiff... will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof fail not, and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand and seal of said Court, this.......7.-...... day Clerk of Su a Returnable to... of the-Superior Court of 273 A<4&. neitg £0 — 19.4.0 a North Carolina 4 In the Superior Court Iredell County § May Term,1910. % J.A. Davidson,Plaintiff . Southern Railway Company ,Defendant. The defendant answers the Complaint in this case and Bays: --First-- That it is a corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of, the laws of the State of Virginia, has been and is now in possession of and operating a line of Railroad through the County of Iredell and State of North Carolina. --Second-- It is true that there is a grade crossing East of the Station in Statesville,N.C., and that the defendant keeps a watchman at said crossing; all other allegations contained im said para- graph are not true and are denied. ~-Third-- It is true that Arthur Johnson was in charge of the team of mules of the plaintiff, and drove the Same upon the track but defendant denies all the other allegations contained in <—s paragraph. And for a further answer and omens to plaintiff's cause of action, the defendant says? ~-First-- That at said crossing the defendant Company not only had erected a sign or warning to the travelers upon the highway that a railroad was there, but had on that day, as upon @ther days, a regular and competent watchman, and that said watch- am on the day named was present and attempted to stop the arivéx of said team from going upon said track, while the train ote 4 e was approaching, but said driver in disregard of the notice, carelessly and negligently failed to stop, look and listen before going upon the track and carelessly and negligently failed to take notice or be governed by the efforts of said watch- man to stop him, but carelessly and negligently drove upon the crossing when he saw or could have seen the engine approaching said crossing. --Second-- That the driver of the plaintiff's team was guilty of contributory negligence in his failure to stop,laok and lis- ten to ascertain if any engine or cars were approaching the cross- ing; in not stopping the team as he could have done; in negligent- ly failing to obey the instructions of the flagman stationed at said crossing. And having fully answered the defendant asks that it recover its cost in its behalf expended and go hence without day. Attorney for Defendant . B.A. Cowan, being duly sworn says that he is Local Agent of the defendant Company, at Statesville,N.C., that he has read the foregoing answer and that the same is true of his own knowl- edge, except as to matters and things stated therein upon informa- tion and belief, and as to those he believes it to be true. Sworn to and subscribed to before me this the ---- day of Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, County--GREETING: Defendant.......... . And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, , Clerk of our said Court, at office Monday alter th@ one Monday = Against _- j / { ow ccwecncncencsscetesesscessccocoses= Korps cero cece ccc ereesececes Defendant SUBPOENA--Civil CIVIL SUBPOEN A.—Printed and for sale at the CaROLINA Mascot office, Statesville, N. C. e State of North Carolina, To the Sheriff of Ireéell County--Greeting: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUFIFMON...........- Hiram. A118 0N,.. COLOLO Dennen &bSi4then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of... Southern. Railway.Co.0. ina certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein... nna ee dvs DEVI 4G0R--— . Plaintiff..., and Sonthern. Railway.Company.is Defendant.......... - And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, Clerk of our said Court, at office in... Sta Gee 16 WC ac eae ka oe ey the.........2h'2 _....Monday after the _18t. .. ___Monday in March ccd SPL LL Clerk Superior Court. 2 LE eee AGAINST sO eRY. CO 2 SUBPOENA.--Civil. For Hiram.Alliaon,Calored. be seal Ht Lei [is AL At ALM Lah curd Char ae oe rnb, LLU hg wes Race, Att (har Kee | bf; pte ALLL, ee Ke td // MAE? St Le de “a jp z — Cea LA ti apie fprecen® geek te esegvsy fe Iygh, Fre sapere Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF oe eee Counry--GREETING: Wel. é YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON a personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our said county at Poorer Monday in Defendant.......... . And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. _ 5-1§-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF. ~ 227 EC- County--GREETING: ed YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON Dee Mz in a certain LO before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein ae Plaintiff —, , and And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. , Clerk of our said Court, at office Monday after ae Monday CA Superior Court for Nia Civil Subpoena.— Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF opel , County--GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON 280.2 SBNE Nn Grr nennenenennectneneenneneenensnnsneneneanenennenensans peta seecahtcabsseanaasnatn a personally to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the next Court to be held for our. said county at Defendant ees . And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, | , Clerk of our said Coutt, at office Clerk Superior Court for......4./ 204% C. ..County. Term, 190 S Way gr sGt Ds, Yl” Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. . 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, | TO THE SHERIFF OF 2 LO County--GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY Ce, ee eee ee eer eet renn reenter Be eee ee ne Fu ak Cet ee in a certain co ersy before a Court in oe and then and there Ee be tried, wherein fa A Ks GEC{IA Plaintiff Va ees wel 7H Aho AW~ Cr Lk u Defendant.......... . And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, , Clerk of our said Court, at office iis 5 4 : * a h North Carolina Superior vourt Iredell County Joi. Davidson,Plaintiff =-~VS— Southern Kailway Company, Defendant. --First-- Was the plaintiff's mules and wagon injured by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the Complaint? Answer; yr =-Second—— Was the mules and wagon injured by the contributery ucgligence of the plaintiff's driver, as alleged in the Auswer? Answer: fi— ~-Third-- What damage, if any,is the plaintiff entitled to 2 recover? Answer: North Carolina In the Superior Court Iredell County May Term,1911. JA. Davidson ,Plaintiff -vVs- JUDGMENT. Southern Railway Company, Defendant. This cause coming on to be heard at this term of the Court, before His Honor C:C. Lyons, Judge and the jury I upon the whole record and the issues submitted te the Jury and the jury having found that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, end not entitled to recover: It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court, that the plaintiff rece ver nothing because of his writ, and that Seutherm Railway Company, recover its cost in its behalf expended and go hence without 6 JeA. DAVIDSON ,PLAINTIFF enYRoo . SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. DEFENDANT. JUDGMENT. Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—5—,04. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF ¢-<County--GREETING: Wou are Hereby Commanded to Summon Monday in next, then and there to testify and the teres twain Gera t Ole ee ttneeeeeteeatien damien a in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein : a | Defendent And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. Witness ceesssnee! , Clerk of our said Court, at office in Monday in erk Superior Court for.Z7...4< S1E/ 1 een pen O61 ‘Way, Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-'07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Srdte Counry<GREE FING: the Court House ing ~ in a certain controversy before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein ge. Devi 0> ox Plaintiff Defendant.......... . And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. , Clerk of our said Court, at office Y MY Arthinsod Superior Court for. ees “Se , } PY hoy Iona grr BUY = eg. ward YY El LOO BRU ITM) 970 Civil Subpoena.—Prtinted and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—5—,04. S E QF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Dou are Hereby Commanded to van /- depending, and then and t Ged Defendent.._>. Witness . Civil Subpoena.— Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. Cc. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Grr 2X County--GREETING: / on personally to appear before the Judge of le at the next Court to be held for our said county at | Plaintiff Defendant.......... . And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, ‘.., Clerk of our said Court, at office Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, TO THE SHERIFF OF County--GREETING: Li "eC COMMANDED TO SUMMON the Court Hose i 1 ee Seager a Defendant.......... . And this you shall in no wise omit, under the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, . , Clerk of our said Court, at office Monday after the... eee Monday i a a V, [bert cid WE Court for Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 5-15-’07-2M. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, To THE SHERIFF OF Dre dart County--GREETING: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED TO SUMMON ....._ fo vx toe Covel Al La deol Speseonnnassotnannnncninaplersansagpanesnetinsecseonnadsesertetnses ZB ots to appear before the Judge of Superior Court, at the mext Court to be held for our said county at the Court House in... A=“ , SI Defendant.......... . And this you shall in no wise omit, and the penalty prescribed by law. WITNESS, . , Clerk of our said Court, at office Monday after the... eee Monday ee ree Cer Superior Court for Civil Subpoena.—Printed and for sale by Brady, The Printer, Statesville, N. C. 2M—5—,04. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, TO THE SHERIFF OF Ac. | LLC! Couvry-GRE BING. . VA k- Oban Dou are Dereby Commanded to Summon aL ; / the Court House in.......447.~ ; CCA ot arnt hathertheaBen aft next, then and there to testify and the truth to say in behalf of... I ; 7 J a ina C. controversy (before said Court depending, and then and there to be tried, wherein Aa { Atnr«29 La” Ly = Ss 4 Pipitis = vand........ this you shall in no wiscomit, under the penalty prescribed by law. hy ae em LN Crkvtd-ta oe aereeaee , Clerk of our said Court, at office in