HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0926 (2)481
meeting. At the last meeting, there was no opposition. There was no one present, to my memory, in
opposition to it.
BECKHAM: Mr. Pope, I have two questions. Cne is to make sure I understand, Mr. Jennings, are
you reserving the right to separate units that are presently shown being attached? Do you want that
to be an understanding in the record that units #1 and 1`2 could be taken apart and air space with
some sort of understanding about set back, or what do you have in mind?
JENNINGS:What I have in mind is that the tract that the first two homes ae shown on could be
subdivided into two single family building sites. The set backs would be, could be anywhere from
attached to detached, to any extent that they wanted to build them. The set backs, and also I would
want to have the flexibility of locating the units within, all dwellings to be built within the
minimum set back requirements, 35'from the front. Is the front the road?
And 35' from the rear or the lake side and 15' from side yards. And then the two outside lots would
be, would respect the offset fromas adjacent different zoning.
BECKHAM: Mr. Pope, did we determine in an earlier case that piers should be shown on a sketch
plan?
POPE: Yes.
BECKHAM: I would suggest then that we have those added as information on this Plat.
JENNINGS: I would like to not have to de that, if posssible, because of the engineering that
will be involvedin changing the water front. I own the land under the lake adjacent to several of
like on #5 and #6, for instance, that inlet would be, I
these pieces, and so there will be some,
would need to go through all the appropriate agencies to get (not clear) and put in a sea wall
extend
to know howwengto
and a pier from
there,
are goiit's
be ablelittle
tohard
treat theput
water fronP�ers in without knowing more
about it
POPE: Perhaps I could ask a few questions. As I count the lots, you propose a maximum of 11
lots, is that right?
JENNINGS: I'm proposing a maximum of 21 homes on 23 acres, and the side lines that have been
fput in on or purposespof ac seating the ally ldeedingsites on the war the deed to the buyeont�etllintend
thoseuse
lots asorder
bou bouned daries.
for
property
POPE: How do you intend to convey lots #5 and #6, or units #5 and #6, as a condo?
JENNINGS: As a tract of land with a metes and bounds description.
POPE: With the understanding that the person who bought that tract of land can build two units
on it?
HEDRICK: Or one?
POPE: Or less, yes.
JENNINGS: Correct.
POPE: Now the lot that has units #1 and #2, does it front the lake?
JENNINGS: It has 124.25' on the water.
POPE: Will you propose a pier for that lot?
JENNINGS: I propose a pier for that lot. That particular situation i will get into by actual-
ly dredging back into our property and creating a dock there. In the absence of going through that
process there would be, the pier would just come off that water front.
POPE: You would propose that the area that includes units #1 and #2 would be sold by metes and
bounds by you as just one tract, with the understanding that up to two units could be built on it?
JENNINGS: That would be correct.
POPE: And that there would be no more than one pier built on it?
JENNINGS: That would be correct.
POPE: So that maximum number of piers built
JENNINGS: Would be ten.
POPE: Would be ten.
BECKHAM: I think we need to specify that, because I can foresee a problem if there is a buyer
in the future that we would possibly be denying a water front property owner the right of a pier.
JEMNINGS: I will be dealing with that with deed restrictions, in other words the lot
BECKHAM: But if someone comes in with a building permit, we can't deny them a permit subject
to deed restrictions. We would reference back to the PRD.