Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0899 (2)454 HEDRICK: We'll rc^onvene info regular meeting. The question before us proposed by Mr. Davenport who has acted as our moderctor this evening, our chairman, is: Is there a need for Heronwood to be here before us this evening? I think we need to address that issue first. I personally think that the need exists. I think that based on the impression, valid or to invalid, on the parts of the commissioners, present and previous, that certain things are going indicates that they do be done, and now changes are going to be done, and now changes are occurring So having said that I would be need to have the approval, in my way of thinking, from this board. interested in hearing any contradictory thoughts to that effect. STEWART: Is that a statement of fact on the part of the board? HEDRICK: No. That's a statement of fact in my way of thinking. STEWART: Will that require a vote? HEDRICK: No. If there is any contradiction or if there were a notion that they need not be here, it would be in order at this time. Hearing none, we will proceed with the findings. I heard no motions. There were no motions nor vote. MILLS: (not clear) objections to your comments. HEDRICK: Right. HEDRICK: We've got to consider the two tests given here, if Mr. Davenport will keep me on met. tract. That is N1, that all development standards established herein have been satisfactorily That's one. DAVENPORT: That's the first test. Do you want to go ahead and address that one first? DAVENPORT: Do you want to go down the standards one by one? HEDRICK: Yes. Let's go over them again. DAVENPORT: First standard is, Does the total development capable of creating an environment of sustained desirability and stability? I think you restrict it only to the nature of the modifica- it might be affected by tion, don't look at the whole development, but only the whole development as the of the modification proposes, that modificati.m. so that is, given the nature of what proposal of sustained desirability and stability? does the development create an environment HEDRICK: This total development, clarify that again, you're saying for us you discount the future completely, total development. You think only in terms of, DAVENPORT: It's still the total development, but the total development considering primarily the sewage treatment, that is as it would be affected by this particular (not clear) HEDRICK: As opposed to septic? DAVENPORT: As opposed to septic. I would ignore the contrast. Say with the proposed develop- ment, given the sewage treatment plant, would it be capable of creating an environment of sustained desirability and stability? HEDRICK: Is there any problem with that test? Or that standard? STEWART: Would you state that one more time? DAVENPORT: All right. The issue is, Given that we have a modification before us for a sewage that treatment plant and a modification of a PRO, would that, would the total development, given desirability and stability? modification, be capable of creating an environment of sustained STEWART: And stability? DAVENPORT: And stability. Sustained desirability and stability. Let me comment. This is the broadest of all the standards that you will be looking at, with the exception of the last standard. If you want to pass on that one and come back to it. MILLS: I think that's the one you have to vote on, that one and the second test. (not clear) be located or operated to create That one and the one "that no part of the proposed development will issue, and frankly I have problems with a nuisance." 1 think that's an issue. I think this is an the waste treatment facility. And the problem is that both systems, both the septic systems and the PRD approved, and they're not going to back away from it. They've already we've already got started building, so we have to pick and choose which one we feel like is most desirable or two undesirable systems for multi -family residences located on the lake. We are not going to have any trouble with any of the other standards, are we? HEDRICK: The rast of them don't appear to be as, I guess, as vague, and left up to individual is to be? The ' interpretation as that one. L'ho knows what sustai:md desirability and stability going