Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0869 (2)424 Secondly, assuming it is needed, whether the applicant, the petitioner, has satisfied the board that the dz­lopment as modified will meet the development standards that are set out in the ordinance. I am going to refer you particularly to Section 87.2 of the Ordinance, and I am going to simply direct you to notice a couple of provisions in there, because I think they arc going to come up as being very applicable in the sense that it,, mainly standards 87.2(a), (b). (e), (f), and (k). I won't get into the standards in terms of giving you any guidance or interpreting at this time, but I may come back at a later time, if the chairman so desires, and answer any questions or give you some comments. Your duty as a board is to make preliminary findings of fact, make findings of fact as to whether the petitioner has satisfied the burdens that are set out for him. That is, whether he meets the standards and is due a modification of the SUP. The procedure that is set out in the regulations, I should note in terms of presen- ting the evidence. I sce no need and certainly do not encourage making objections during the course of the testimony. You may reserve your objections. All objections are preser- ved and will be made in the formal record. When You sce the record itself, it is assumed that at that time Lhat we can prove anything from the record and establish a. formal record that will be acceptable for a decision. So you can reserve your objections for looking at the written transcript. You will have e written transcript prepared, I assume? Secondly, in terns of order I will ask that everyone of the witnesses and persons who are going to make any statements whatsoever or need to ask a question be sworn in. With regard to the order of the the presentation, I am going to ask that the staff give us the presentation first, that we then take opening statements from the parties who have de- clared themselves to have an interest in this proceeding. At that time, after the opening statement, if the openinq statements, in fact, are not waived. After that we will pro- ceed, and what I suggest is that we go with the petitioner's request first. The peti- tioners can either start the case either by cross-examining the staff, if you so desire, or presenting your own case and reserving that cross-examination until the end of your case or whenever you feel it is convenient. Folloving the close of each of the peti- tioner's witnesses, I am going to allow the cross-examination by the opponents that are declared. The other think I would notice is that the board members may at anytime interrupt any of the witnesses to ask any question whatsoever. On the other hand, the audience, we would ask t.'aat yoo reserve your questions until the end of the testimony of the person who is testifying. That's fairly clear. If you need clarification of something said and you can't follrca it, by 711 means interrupt and let's slow it down so we can figure out what's being testified to. At the close of the cast, .,ill Iiave the opponents' closing arguments and the peti- tioners' closing arguments, and the board at that time may decide to either close the hearing or to continue it. I won't try to anticipate what your decision on that might be. Probably that should be the first thing you decide though. Following that if the h^aring is closed, we will proceed to findings of fact. Is t7,are any questions at all with regard to the proceedings? Can you hear me? HEDRICK: Only if ther- is some people wh^ wish to speak for or against the issue that have not registered, we would ask that you do so now. DAVENPORT: O.K. L^tls proceed, if you would, to the Heronwood case. Administer the oath when you cone up to testify. CLERK: Mallard Head is first on the agenda. DAVENPORT: I'm sorry. Let's ga on to Mallard Head. Clerk administers the oath to Lisa Bcckham and Duane Lewis. BECKHAM: My name is Lisa Beckham. I am the planning director for Iredell County. Exhibit 1, site plan, presented to the board. This is the site plan far Mallard Head condominiums, PRD, which was previously approved by this board. Modification of this plan involves location of the wastewater treatment plant. The modification involved is the addition of a wastewater treatment plant on the property. You will note that on the southeast corner of the property, a triangular point of property. This is the only change on the plat or the drawing previously approved. DAVENPORT: Could I ask you, was there a sewage treatment plant in the original