Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_0356MOTION from Chairman Haire that the nominations be closed and elect Mr. Boone by acclamation. VOTING: Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Hamby) ADJUSTMENTS TO THE AGENDA: Mr. Mashburn pointed out the adjustments that needed to be made in the agenda, and the board concurred with the changes recommended. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF LETTERS OF CREDIT: The two letters of credit were presented by Mr. Jerry Lundy were as follows: MONTERREY LANDING SUBDIVISION - $401,600.00 MOTION from Commissioner Madison to approve the letter of credit as presented. VOTING: Ayes - 5: Nays - 0. DONALDSON LANDING SUBDIVISION - $189,346.50 MOTION from Commissioner Madison to approve the letter of credit as presented. VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0. CONTINUATION OF DI8CU88ION OF OPTONETRIC EYE CARE CENTER - PROP08AL8 PREBENTED: Mrs. Carolyn Harris, Personnel Director, presented three proposals for eye care for county employees that she has received. This service to the employees would not require any county funds. The companies were offering discounts for the county employee group for using their service. Mrs. Harris was asking the board to give permission to the staff to pursue the best proposal on behalf of the county employees and to approve the recommendation of her proposal. She gave the following order of choices: 1. Optometric Eye Care Center (first choice) 2. Allred Optical Company (second choice) 3. McKinnon Eye Clinic (third and least satisfactory proposal) Mr. Mashburn said he had discussed this service with some of the other optometrists in the community and they thought a company could offer this service to county employees without the involvement of the board of commissioners. He said this might be setting a precedent in the future for other services. He thought further consideration is required. MOTION from Commissioner Boone to postpone a decision on this matter indefinitely. VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0. MODIFICATION TO RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD ORDINANCE: Mr. Mashburn addressed this matter to the board. Some discrepancies now occur in the way board members are elected to the recreation advisory board and the way the current ordinance reads; therefore, some changes should be considered for the existing ordinance. The following are the recommended changes: DEC X993 339