Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_0205AUG IIM3 188 This is based on the Average Daily Membership (ADM) for Iredell-Statesville School System and Mooresville Graded School District, and on full-time, unduplicated students for Mitchell Community College, Mrs. Blumenstein said. MOTION from Commissioner Hamby to hold the bond referendum in November for the amount of $41,000,000 for the three school systems in Iredell County. In discussion of the motion, Mr. Mashburn pointed out that the amount for the community college would have to be stated separately from that of the public schools when placed on the ballot. The resolution must be approved in its entirety, Mr. Mashburn said. Mrs. Blumenstein said this is according to the Local Government Commission. Chairman Haire requested Commissioner Hamby to repeat her motion and include the requirements of the Local Government Commission. Commissioner Madison made the following statement and requested that it be placed in the minutes: I have some very strong feelings about this issue and I have tried to put them as concisely as possible and would like to read this into the record. We are being asked tonight to support a bond referendum on November 2nd of this year. As I understand the only advantage of this date is that a positive vote on November 2, 1993 would allow the school board and the present administration an additional six months of planning time. This sounds reasonable on the surface, but is it the only reason? To review a little history on this subject, the school board first requested an October 1993 bond referendum date to coincide with the municipal elections. Could it be that they thought that a small turn -out of municipal voters would help accomplish their goal of putting this County $51 million in debt? 2. The State of North Carolina is having a special election on November 2, 1993 to approve one of the largest bond packages in the history of our state. Is there a possibility that the school board is hoping for a small turn -out with a positive coat tail effect from the state bond vote? We as a board have already approved the May bond issue for school construction in Iredell County. Our staff will have to put this issue on the fast track to accommodate a change of date. The original request from Iredell-Statesville schools was for $41 million in bond. This morning Chairman Long and Dr. Register said that they could get by with less than $30 million. My question is do they really need that? Could they get by with $25 million? What is the real need? I believe instead of rushing around like Chicken Little screaming, "The sky is falling, the sky is falling!" that we should charge the school board to come up with a concrete plan of how they are going to spend $30 million and give us a priority list as to what would be first, second, third, etc. Also we need a detailed list of furniture, fixtures, supplies, equipment, projected operating costs, etc. With this information, we and the people of Iredell County can make an informed choice at the polls in May. In looking at the people who are looking for a fast track vote, I think it rather amusing that it includes a number of past school board members and commissioners who had the opportunity to give the voters of Iredell County a vote on merger of the school systems, but they thought it was not wise to give that much authority to the voters at that time. Have they had a change of heart? I think not. This is the same group that advocated a government of the few, by the few, and for the few.