Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_0102580 06,61 i Ab Road, 1/B mile north of I-40, and is more specifically identified as a portion of Lots 69 & 70, Block A, of Iredell County Tax Map SM. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Chairman Haire suggested the motion be amended to include the review of the site plan which the planning board did not have at its last meeting. Mr. Lundy said the next meeting of the planning board is tomorrow night, which would not be enough time. The first meeting in June would be a better date. He said the county commissioners were presented evidence that the planning board did not have. He thought that the county commissioners could remand the decision back to the planning board for further consideration in view of the additional evidence the planning board did not have in making its decision, and have them make a further recommendation to the board of commissioners. Chairman Haire inquired if Mr. Boone would be willing to amend his motion to that effect and that it be heard at the first meeting in June, which will be June 2, 1993. Mr. Boone said he would be willing to make that amendment to the motion. VOTING: Ayes - 4 (Boone, Haire, Hamby, Madison) Noes - 1 (Stewart) BITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN POR EARLY VESTING OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS - OAK CREEK - PROPERTY OF HARRY L. TSUNAS, ET AL: Mr. Lundy read the requirements for the Site Specific Development Plan from the Zoning Ordinance. MOTION from Madison to approve a Site Specific Development Plan for Early Vesting of Development Rights, Oak Creek, pursuant to Section 105, as proposed and recommended by the planning board for a period of five years, based on the following findings: A. The use meets all required specifications of the zoning ordinance. B. The use will not materially endanger the public health and safety and will not substantially injure the value of adjoining property if located where proposed. C. That the site specific development plan is vested for a period of five years, based on one or more of the factors so described in Section 105.6, which are: (1) The sizing and phasing (2) The level of investment (3) Market conditions --building permits for all phases cannot be secured within the two-year period of time. VOTING: Ayes - 4 (Madison, Haire, Hamby, Boone) Nays - 1 (Stewart) AMENDMENT TO SECTION 67 01 THE IREDELL COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE: Commissioner Boone said he would like to reiterate that he was not in favor of decreasing the 1/2 mile limitation between mobile home parks. He recognized there were people present who were concerned that the board might decrease this 1/2 mile, and neither he nor any of the other board members, he did not think, were in favor of decreasing this 1/2 mile. MOTION from Commissioner Stewart to approve the proposed amendments to Section 67, making sure that Section 67.45(1)(2) remains as it is presently, with the 1/2 mile separation between mobile homes. VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0.