HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_0017MAP I C 1993
70% Federal, 158 State, and 158 local.
Mr. Garrison asked that the plan be revised to include one
rehabilitated van for the Iredell County Developmental Day Center;
the purchase of a van for Tri -County Mental Health Agency; a
replacement van for the Iredell Vocational Workshop, an expansion
van for the E1derCenter. The E1derCenter has recently been added
to the TDP. The request also included a replacement van for I -
Care. The application for these funds was received the first of
March and they have until May 3rd to submit the application. A
public hearing must be held prior to the submission on May 3rd. It
is urgent for the Board to have this plan prior to the May 3rd
date.
MOTION from Commissioner Stewart to approve the request as
submitted by Mr. Garrison, which is:
1 - van rehabilitation (#1179) for Iredell Developmental Day
Care
1 - expansion van for Tri -County Mental Health
1 - replacement van for Iredell Vocational Workshop (#0463)
1 - replacement van for I -Care (15655)
1 - expansion van for ElderCenter
VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
NON -OWNER PETITION - BELL BARK ROAD AREA: Mr. Jerry Lundy
presented this petition to the board. The petition was submitted
to the Iredell County Planning Board on March 3, 1993. The
petition contains about 565 acres, starting at Fourth Creek and
extending to within 2,000 feet of Highway 70 East. The petitioners
obtained 908 of the owners' signatures, Lundy said. This is 69 out
of 77 owners, who represent 818 of the property. The planning
board recommended to the county commissioners that this petition be
found appropriate. There are 116 properties in this boundary,
which are owned by 77 different property owners, Lundy said.
For the benefit of the members of the board who have not
considered a non -owner petition before, Mr. Lundy explained the
process. it goes through four meetings prior to approval.
Commissioner Hamby inquired how many of the petitioners live
on the west side of Bell Road. Mr. Lundy said there are probably
more on the west side than on the other, but he did not have the
number.
Chairman Haire asked that Mr. Lundy explain the difference in
Residential/Agricultural zoning and the R-20. The major difference
between the RA and R-20, Lundy said, was the RA allows some light,
non-residential uses around intersections and allows mobile homes
on individual lots and mobile home parks. The R-20 essentially
does not allow any non-residential uses and does not allow mobile
homes or mobile home parks. There are some other minor
differences.
Commissioner Madison inquired who determined the original
boundary of the petition. Mr. Lundy said the boundaries are
generally drawn by whomever submits the petition. Sometimes staff
has input and sometime not.
The first 2,000 feet off Highway 70 is suggested by staff to
be omitted from the petitioned area because, according to the Land
Use Plan, this would be a commercial area.
Chairman Haire inquired if the County Manager could give
advice regarding those who were present who wished to speak and
this is not a public hearing. He said a majority of the property