Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93011_175230. Total cost of needlelsyringe for pre -euthanasia drug. $13.565 (Cost ofneedlelsyringe x number ofdogs needing pre -euthanasia anesthesia) 31. Average cost per total animals for needle/syringe for pre -euthanasia drug: $0.00127 (Total cost of needlelsyringe/ total number of animals euthanized) 32. Total supply cost per animal: $1.915 (Sodium pentobarbital per animal + syringe + needle + pre -euthanasia drug + pre -euthanasia needlelsyringe) 33. Total cost per animal: $2.52 (equipment cost per animal + labor cost per animal + supply cost per animal) SUMMARY 34. Cost per year: Carbon Monoxide: $11,880.30 35. Cost per year: Sodium Pentobarbital: $15,062.70 Difference. 3,182.40 `Includes cost of Acepromazine, needlelsyringe. Approximate cost for 50 pound dog: $0.30 x 2985 dogs _ $895.50 Greg Biffle, Chairman of the Friends of the Animals group said the shelter's hours needed to be extended in order for the public to have sufficient time to make adoptions. He submitted a petition and stated 3,000 people had signed it. Biffle said the organization had a long-term goal to build a $2 million adoption center. He said at some point, it was envisioned the adoptions could actually become profitable. Commissioner Robertson asked how many animals had the microchips. He also asked about the proposed employee who would be a trained euthanasia technician. Kramer said nationwide, there were about $15 million microchips, and locally, around 10 to 15 percent of the animal population had them. In regards to the euthanasia technician, she said nationally these people were paid about $45,000. She said that if anyone already employed with the county was interested in taking the training, this would be sufficient. Dr. Kramer said a person could become certified in one week. Commissioner Williams said a visit was made to the shelter earlier in the day, and one concern the employees had about the proposal was that many of the "select" animals would be housed at the new adoption center. He asked if an adoption center was also needed elsewhere in the county. Dr. Kramer said the organization was focused on getting as many animals adopted as possible. She said that with the growth occurring in the county, having more than one adoption center might be realistic. Biffle said an adoption center would make adoptions faster, and this would eliminate so many animal deaths. Commissioner Williams said many microchips didn't work when they were scanned. Kramer said this was true, and there were many companies manufacturing them. She said the group had a goal to buy more scanners. (No action taken by the board.) PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Norman declared the meeting to be in a public hearing. Request for the Consideration of an Enhanced Voluntary Agricultural District (EVAD) Ordinance & a Proposed Conservation Agreement: Planning & Development Director Ron Smith said the Voluntary Farmland Preservation ordinance had been successful with over 13,000 acres of land in the program. He said that in 2005, the state added language to the statute for enhancements, and as such, the EVAD was a stand-alone document. Smith said an EVAD was irrevocable for a ten-year period and properties were eligible to receive a higher percentage of cost -share funds. He stated participation in the program was voluntary, and it wasn't being imposed on anyone.