Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93011_1614STAFF COMMENTS: The Exit 42 Small Area Plan identifies this area as suitable for future interchange commercial development. The applicant has chosen the HB -CUD classification, which allows for a greater range of commercial uses and is similar to other nearby commercial properties. Adjacent parcels to the north are zoned commercial by the County or zoned Highway Business by the Town of Troutman. The majority of parcels abutting this tract to the west, south, or across Charlotte Highway are zoned Highway Business or General Business CUD. Although this request is consistent with the Iredell County Exit 42 Small Area Plan and creates a unified zoning classification along this portion of Charlotte Highway, Staff has some concerns after meeting with Town of Troutman representatives regarding this rezoning request. According to the Town of Troutman, water and sewer capacity has not been allotted by the Board of Alderman to this site. Additionally, the Troutman Exit 42 Plan identifies the northern portion of the requested site as future interchange commercial; however, the southern half is coded as either undesignated, office, or medium density residential uses. Staff feels that in light of the new information, past zoning history of Exit 42, and differences of adopted land use plans, a recommendation for approval, with reservations by staff should be noted. Any future commercial development that requires town utilities will need to approach the Town of Troutman and meet all criteria for such utility extension. PLANNING BOARD ACTION. On June 6, 2007, the Planning Board voted 8-0 to recommend approval of this request and to advise that it is consistent with the Iredell County Exit 42 Small Area Plan. Commissioner Johnson said he recalled the Department of Transportation had strict requirements when the Lowes rezoning occurred in the vicinity. He asked if the state would be involved in the development of this property. Smith said yes, and the Town of Troutman would impose additional standards. Smith said the county did not have traffic impact requirements in the ordinance, and it was difficult to really determine the upfront impact. Commissioner Robertson said the interchange was basically at capacity now and on the opposite side of the Interstate there were many subdivisions being built. He voiced concerns about the similarity between this interchange and Exit 36. No one else desired to speak. OTION,, by Commissioner Johnson to approve the zoning map amendment and to make a finding that the approval was consistent with the adopted Iredell County Exit 42 Small Area Plan and that said approval is reasonable and in the public interest due to its consistency with the Iredell County Exit 42 Small Area Plan; as a result, said approval furthers the goals and objectives of the Iredell County Exit 42 Small Area Plan. VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0. OTIO by Commissioner Tice to approve the Conditional -Use Findings -of -Fact. VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0. Case No. 0706-4: Owners/Applicants William & Teresa Miller, Bobby & Mary Karriker, Doris Bostian, along with Robert L. & Mary B. Kinser Request the Rezoning of Property from Single Family Residential (R-20) to Residential Agricultural: Planning Director Smith said this case involved 83 acres, and R-20 zoning had been imposed since countywide zoning was implemented. He then reviewed the staff report as follows: CASE NO. 0706-4 OWNERS/APPLICANTS: William & Teresa Miller Doris Bostian 165 Big Forest Drive PO Box 325 Statesville, NC 28677 Mt Mourne, NC 28127