Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93011_0992IREDELL COUNTY BOARD OF REGULAR MINUTES DECEMBER 20, 2005 The Iredell County Board of Commissioners met in Regular Session on Tuesday, December 20, 2005, at 7:00 P.M., in the Iredell County Government Center (Commissioners' Meeting Room), 200 South Center Street, Statesville, NC. Present were: Sara Haire Tice, Chairman Vice Chairman Godfrey Williams Steve Johnson Marvin Norman Absent: Ken Robertson Staff present: County Manager Joel Mashburn, County Attorney Bill Pope, Deputy County Manager Susan Blumenstein, Planning Supervisor Steve Warren, and Clerk to the Board Jean Moore. CALL TO ORDER by Chairman Tice. INVOCATION by Commissioner Johnson. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ADJUSTMENTS OF THE AGENDA: OTIO by Chairman Tice to adjust the agenda by the following action. Deletion: • Removal of the Public Hearing listed on the Agenda in Conjunction with a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Signs (Section 11.16). (The hearing was held for public comment and adjourned on December 6, 2005.) VOTING: Ayes — 4; Nays — 0. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Consideration of a Proposed Amendment to the Iredell County Zoning Ordinance Section 11.16 - Signs Permitted Without a Permit: Planning Supervisor Warren said this proposed amendment was a "follow-up" from the county attorney in response to ground signs for a volunteer fire department. He said the staff had studied the matter and proposed a zoning ordinance text amendment that would classify volunteer fire departments (VFDs) in the same category as governmental signs. Warren added that governmental signs did not require a permit. He said these agencies would also be relieved of the general requirement of a 10' setback from the edge of the right away for ground signs. Warren said the signs needing to comply with the ordinance would be general private commercial signage. He said the planning board had denied passage of the amendment due to the belief that it was unfair to require a private entity to meet a 10' sign setback and not others. He said there were two purposes for a sign setback, and these were esthetics and safety. Warren said visibility for the motorist was also important, and in terms of a governmental agency, location or prominence was especially important. Warren said it would appear that public safety entities might be given some special privileges. Commissioner Johnson said the board had two alternatives: (1) choose not to accept/approve the amendment, and if this occurred, the staff would be expected to carry out the ordinance and (2) adopt the ordinance to end the possibility of litigation. He said the staff had discovered case law that indicated the county might have problems prevailing in a lawsuit. Johnson asked County Attorney Pope if this was an accurate summation.