HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0932487
sioners to put it to a vote of the people.
Brief recess.
MOTION from Commissioner Mills to adjourn to public hearing for the purpose of resuming the
Ridgecliff Planned Residential Development Special Use District Hearing.
VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0.
RIDGECLIFF PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - SPECIAL USE DISTRICT HEARING, CONTINUED:
POPE: I believe all the evidence has been presented, is that correct, Miss Beckham?
BECKHAM: Yes.
POPE: Mr. Jennings, do you have any further evidence you desire to present to the commission-
ers in the public hearing on your rezoning request?
JENNINGS: I just wanted to add these.
POPE: We are going to ask the staff if they have any recommendations.
I ask you now, whether there is any other evidence to be presented?
JENNINGS: No.
POPE: Is there any questions by any of the commissioners to either of these witnesses?
Ms. Beckham, I understand the staff has a recommendation to the commissioners, and that is that
- recommendation would assume that the commissioners were able to find facts that would support it.
BECKHAM: Yes.
The first recommendation is that no modification will be permitted except on application of the
homeowners' association.
The second is that 11 piers will be permitted with up to 21 slips allowed. The locations of
the piers will be selected by the homeowners' association.
Number 3. The open space shown on Exhibit #1 will be owned by the home owners association,
subject to a well easement reserved by the developer.
Number 4. The special use permit is subject to:
(a) Approval by the district highway engineer.
(b) Plans for water and sewer be approved by the state or local health
authorities as appropriate.
(c) Liability insurance as required by ordinance in effect at the time
of the issuance of the first building permit.
Number 5. Units shown on Exhibit #1, as attached may be built detached, but no more units per
lot shall be built than are shown on Exhibit #1. No side yard set back will be required between
units shown as attached if built detached.
j Number 6. Lots shown with multiple units may be divided by the developer without requiring a
modification into as many lots as there are units shown on Exhibit #1.
I would recommend that these six recommendations become a part of the Special Use Permit.
MURDOCK: I want you to read #1 please again.
tion.
BECKHAM: No modification will be permitted except on application of the home owners' associa-
The reasoning there is potentially you have as many as 21 different owners in this development,
and to provide for an orderly process of modification, that modification would have to be presented
and agreed upon by the homeowners' association.
Murdock:Ithink I understand what you're saying, but I have a question there. At what point
would the homeowners' association be formed if two or three people, three or four lots are sold,
would it be formed then? Suppose some modification wanted to be in the first lots sold, there would
be no homeowners' association, would there?
BECKHAM: That will be provided for in the bylaws of the homeowners' association. It will be
described at what point the developer would cease to become the homeowners' association. As I
understand it, when it is first set up and Mr. Jennings is the only owner, he is the homeowners'
association. But at such time, be it four units, five units, six units, then he would relinquish
control to that majority.
HEDRICK: That was a good question, Frances, and the first few words that I missed, just read
' the first part of that first recommendation there.
BECKHAM: No modification will be permitted except on application of the homeowners' associa-