HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0929484
back property, so we showed that.
POPE: The street in front of lot #21 or unit #21, is that 60' or 30'?
JENNINGS: 60.
POPE: And 30' of that is owned by Mrs. Cornelius?
JENNINGS: In some cases, it's all (not clear) . . . There's one corner in that 5 -acre tract
where #21 that would be on the (not clear) . . .
POPE: Septic lot?
JENNINGS: And then as it goes on it, if you notice the lots across the street, #1, #2, #3, #4,
it shifts over to, the street right-of-way is on my property at that point. All the way up to lots
#8 and #1
POPE: Any more questions of Mr. Jennings?
BECKHAM: Mr. Pope, I have three things that I want to clarify. First of all 87.2(a), page 60,
that addresses open space, requires that if it is not owned and maintained by the property owners'
association, then other documentation be presented describing tow that open space is owned and
maintained. I don't think Mr. Jennings and I understand this the same way. I my mind, this could
not be deeded to a public utility company unless there's some understanding of preserving it still
as an area as a passive recreation, open space. I think vie need that clarified.
POPE: It would take a modification of the PRD to convey that to a public utility, would it
not?
BECKHAM: In my opinion,
POPE: You can't do it at all?
JENNINGS: We could as a condition of the special use permit.
POPE: I don't know. It's specifically written into the ordinance.
BECKHAM: In my mind, the ordinance requires that there be some kind of open space, and that we
have some explanation of how it's owned and maintained.
JENNINGS: It might be good to replace that, if indeed it becomes a well lot, it might be good
to replace that by way of modification.
POPE: I think it would require that.
BECKHAM: The second thing I want to clarify is that I do believe that the location of the
piers should be shown even if it's only approximate, with some understanding as to what kind of
latitude they can be moved.
The third thing is I also want clarification on separating the units. If in fact someone comes
in for a building permit for what is shown units #1 and #2 and shows them separated that this is in
conformance with the PRD approval.
Those are the three things I wanted to clarify.
POPE: Do you suggest that we make that a condition of the approval, if the commissioners
desire to approve it?
BECKHAM: Yes, I think it would make it much easier once we get to the point of issuing
building permits and we go through this with much scrutiny to make sure that all conditions of
section 87 have been met. Otherwise it could delay Mr. Jennings or whomever is seeking the building
permit if it is not clear.
HEDRICK: I've got a question. According to the information we've been given, Sunny Path Road
is coming across Josephine Cornelius, off of State Road 1332, and then back into your property.
Should our record not reflect or an exhibit not be presented that would show the right-of-way from
Cornelius people is, in fact, given?
JENNINSS: This right-of-way is recorded. And this is on top of the recorded right-of-way that
was provided for this plat.
BECKHAM: It is shown on the tax map.
JENNINGS: In answering Lisa's questions. What's the first one?
3ECKHAM: The three points are maintenance, open space, and
JENNINGS: And we could leave, if we could, let's just leave the open area as is, and it would,
it's a fairly rough spat, and it would be a good, because of the location, the proximity to all the
lots, it would be a great well lot. If and when we did that, we could just handle that by way of ,
modification, if that's agreeable.