Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0926481 meeting. At the last meeting, there was no opposition. There was no one present, to my memory, in opposition to it. BECKHAM: Mr. Pope, I have two questions. Cne is to make sure I understand, Mr. Jennings, are you reserving the right to separate units that are presently shown being attached? Do you want that to be an understanding in the record that units #1 and 1`2 could be taken apart and air space with some sort of understanding about set back, or what do you have in mind? JENNINGS:What I have in mind is that the tract that the first two homes ae shown on could be subdivided into two single family building sites. The set backs would be, could be anywhere from attached to detached, to any extent that they wanted to build them. The set backs, and also I would want to have the flexibility of locating the units within, all dwellings to be built within the minimum set back requirements, 35'from the front. Is the front the road? And 35' from the rear or the lake side and 15' from side yards. And then the two outside lots would be, would respect the offset fromas adjacent different zoning. BECKHAM: Mr. Pope, did we determine in an earlier case that piers should be shown on a sketch plan? POPE: Yes. BECKHAM: I would suggest then that we have those added as information on this Plat. JENNINGS: I would like to not have to de that, if posssible, because of the engineering that will be involvedin changing the water front. I own the land under the lake adjacent to several of like on #5 and #6, for instance, that inlet would be, I these pieces, and so there will be some, would need to go through all the appropriate agencies to get (not clear) and put in a sea wall extend to know howwengto and a pier from there, are goiit's be ablelittle tohard treat theput water fronP�ers in without knowing more about it POPE: Perhaps I could ask a few questions. As I count the lots, you propose a maximum of 11 lots, is that right? JENNINGS: I'm proposing a maximum of 21 homes on 23 acres, and the side lines that have been fput in on or purposespof ac seating the ally ldeedingsites on the war the deed to the buyeont�etllintend thoseuse lots asorder bou bouned daries. for property POPE: How do you intend to convey lots #5 and #6, or units #5 and #6, as a condo? JENNINGS: As a tract of land with a metes and bounds description. POPE: With the understanding that the person who bought that tract of land can build two units on it? HEDRICK: Or one? POPE: Or less, yes. JENNINGS: Correct. POPE: Now the lot that has units #1 and #2, does it front the lake? JENNINGS: It has 124.25' on the water. POPE: Will you propose a pier for that lot? JENNINGS: I propose a pier for that lot. That particular situation i will get into by actual- ly dredging back into our property and creating a dock there. In the absence of going through that process there would be, the pier would just come off that water front. POPE: You would propose that the area that includes units #1 and #2 would be sold by metes and bounds by you as just one tract, with the understanding that up to two units could be built on it? JENNINGS: That would be correct. POPE: And that there would be no more than one pier built on it? JENNINGS: That would be correct. POPE: So that maximum number of piers built JENNINGS: Would be ten. POPE: Would be ten. BECKHAM: I think we need to specify that, because I can foresee a problem if there is a buyer in the future that we would possibly be denying a water front property owner the right of a pier. JEMNINGS: I will be dealing with that with deed restrictions, in other words the lot BECKHAM: But if someone comes in with a building permit, we can't deny them a permit subject to deed restrictions. We would reference back to the PRD.