Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0884439 DAVENPORT: Do you have any questions that you wish to direct to Mr. Williams (sic)? BRYAN: Yes, sir, I do. But before I do, I would like a point a information. Chandler Bryan sworn by Clerk. DAVENPORT: A point of order just before you start. I didn't ask you to give. I forgot you were there, and I didn't ask you to give an opening statement, and I apologize. I will let you make an opening statement after they conclude their case. I hope it hasn't prejudiced you. BRYAN: If everyone is still awake. May I look at the plat that was submitted? 1 haven't seen it. This plat is not accurate. It does not accurately reflect the development so far, Mr. Davenport. DAVENPORT: I think I'll let you testify to that at your time. Do you have any questions with regard to anything he has said? BRYAN: Yes, I do. DAVENPORT: O.K. Let's cover that and come back t� your point that yet, have .ihon you get ready to make your presentation. BRYAN: Stay with me. I sorta got jumbled up. DAVENPORT: O.K. I'm sorry. I threw you off. I had forgotten that there was an opponent. I apologize. BRYAN: Mr. Hollan, do you have any idea how long package plants have been in existence? HOLLAN: I do not. BRYAN: Would you hazard a guess? Would you say one year, six months, five years, ten years? HOLLAND: I couldn't hazard a guess. I don't know. BRYAN: Have you ever built a development which used package treatment plants? HOLLAN: Yes, I have. BRYAN: How long ago was that? HOLLAN: Within the last year and a half. BRYAN: So you at least know they've been in existence the last year and a half? HOLLAN: That's correct. BRYAN: Did you build one before that, using a package plant? HOLLAN: No. BRYAN: That was the first one? HOLLAN: That's correct. BRYAN: Well, I'm curious because I believe that you are the same Mr. Holland who testified back on January of 1984, let's see if I can find you here, in which your attorney, Mr. Walser, asked you this question: He said, "I have one question, Mr. Hollan, do you plan to build into any nitrofication plan an excess capacity?" And you said, "Yes, we do. There is a requirement that an area be set aside for nitrofication fields which is at least double that which will be required based upon the measurements and the suitability of the soil. And we propose to set aside that 100% additional area as required." WALSER: As a point of order, I wish you would read the series of statements immediately preceding that statement into the record and put that into the record, or at least specify that that is a true a valid transcript. It is on record and we can include any parts of it. BRYAN: I'll be glad to make the motion that Exhibit C, dated January 3, 1984, the entirety of it, be made a part of the record. But to save time, anyone can read it. They have a copy of it also. I would suggest that I be allowed to pick out the things and question and review what he was testifying to. DAVENPORT: I don't see any problems with proceeding the questi^ning, if you can follow what he's asking of you, granted. I think if you offer it into the record. I think we even have a copy of the transcript, if that's an accurate representation of what was said then, that's fine.