HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0874429
only takes up a small amount of space. It depends on how you define that buffer strip. I
didn't think of it as a building. I didn't think of it as an accessory use because it's
3/4 buried in the ground.
CROSSWHITE: Is your well already located there?
LEWIS: Yes.
STEWART: Mr. Davenport, do you interpret this PRD shall be buffered from adjacent
residential property? The only residential property that is adjacent to it is his own
buildings, and I believe there's more than 45' separation from that area. So the buffe-
ring can be accomplished with natural and existing plants equivalent to a buffer strip as
defined in subsection 41(c) of this ordinance. When a PRD abuts an R/A or R/R or R020
district, there shall be an open space at least 45' or at least three times the height of
the building.
This is not adjacent to any residential area other than you own (not clear)?
DAVENPORT: Miss Beckham, is this land adjacent to an R/A or R/R district?
BECKHAM: Yes.
DAVENPORT: Are the properties that are in those districts, are any of them residen-
tial?
BECKHAM: All golf course.
DAVENPORT: All golf course?
HEDRICK: Crescent Land & Timber is now :rhat use? It is just undeveloped?
DAVENPORT: Non -used land right now.
BECKHAM: I believe that second sentence, "When a PRD abuts any of those districts,
R/A or R-20, that there be open space between those structures and the adjoining property
line, whether or not the adjoining property is developed or undeveloped. That's how I
recall the intent when the draft (not clear).
DAVENPORT: Your language on the space (not clear) The language appears when it
states when a PRD abuts an R/A, R/R or R-20 district, which it clearly does.; at least (not
clear) there should be an open space at least 45' between the building or accessory use
from the property line. I don't think it really (not clear).
HEDRICK: Duane, is that 30' on the west side of the property line?
LEWIS: That's correct.
HEDRICK: What is the line there, that 140' small line, that triangular line, what
does that line represent? That's not the configuration of the treatment facility, is it?
LEWIS: No. That just represents 30' set back that we designated as an area for the
waste treatment facility.
HEDRICK: My question would then be the actual location of the treatment facility, if
it were approved, could it be placed in there in such a manner as to give you the squired
.......
45'?
LEWIS: Yes, sir. I do. I want one person to confirm that for me..
Lisa, let me ask you a question. Did this go in the record? Isn't there an auto-
matic variance of 10% granted on set backs and buffers?
BECKHAM: Not to my knowledge.
LEWIS: It was just a question.
BECKHAM: I know of no variance (not clear).
DAVENPORT: You may just want to take this back and resubmit this after you comply
with this. It looks like on the space you've got a problem. I'm not going to judge for
the board whether they are in fact going to find this as a fact that this is not 45'. It
appears that you might want to consider that without submitting it, just simply re -do the
drawings, furnish additional information to show that this will be met. It looks like
it's a problem.
MURDOCK: I have a question. I don't know whether it's appropriate or not. Lisa, is
this the first time you seen this? Did you come up with this objection this late in the