HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_0163 (2)4150
BOOK 25 PAGED$
Perhaps I misunderstood that, but if that was the
statement made, I do not understand the meaning of that
statement.
In Dr. Neiter's remarks, there were three items that
I would like to clarify. The first item is that in our
projections in our feasibility study, there are no figures
that had not already been exceeded in terms of patient day
volume. In both the years 1980 and 1979, our patient day
volume was larger than the largest projection in our final
feasibility study. So I did want to clarify that. In
other words, nothing has been projected that we have not
already gone beyond in terms of the last three years.
Secondly, the remark, I believe, was that the medical
staff had not grown in the past eight years. I have been six
years, but I have first hand knowledge, 6k, almost seven
years knowledge of what has taken place during that time.
During that time, we have had three physicians move
away, one who has become disabled from the staff at the
present time. During the second period, we have had
twelve physicians to locate at Lowrance, some of those more
active than others. We have had four added to our full-time
active staff, including Dr. D onatelli, Dr. C. H. Lieu, Dr.
Alfred, and Dr. Copeland.
In addition to that, we have had joining our courtesy
staff specialists in opthomology, neurosurgery, thorasic
surgery (I'm sorry that was Dr. Alfred), orothpedic
surgery, two OB/GYN specialists, and two gastroneurologists,