Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_1248Commissioner Johnson asked what would be on the referendum. Madison said the ballot would ask if the people wanted to go under the jurisdiction of Mooresville or not. Johnson asked if the referendum would ask if the people wanted a plan. Madison said he didn't think this was necessary. He mentioned that a plan was nothing but a snapshot of what an area wants to be five or ten years later. Madison said that whoever administers the plan will have to be flexible. Commissioner Johnson said he understood that the plan was a changing organism. His concern has continuously been the representation issue. Commissioner Boone said he saw valid arguments on both sides. The motion (proposal) was an attempt to meet the concerns of both sides. The final decision on any zoning change (if the proposal was adopted) would remain with the commissioners. There are also some provisions that would prohibit Mooresville from revising the conditional uses placed on Crescent Resources two years ago. Boone asked Madison if he would consider a referendum on the information presented in the motion (proposal) or something similar. Commissioner Madison said it was too complicated. Commissioner Stewart said she had concerns for the entire lake area. If a study on planning is embarked upon, then the entire lake area should be reviewed. Chairman Haire said she felt the Board had let the P.O.S.S.E. group down in that a land development plan was not developed by the County. Commissioner Madison said that a precedent could be set at the meeting. He warned the Board about starting quasi -governmental situations. In the future, a proposal could surface from Langtree Road wherein the residents desired to be taken in by the Town of Davidson. Commissioner Stewart concurred -- she said there needed to be an overall plan. Commissioner Boone suggested that a separate board be appointed for the WSIV Critical Area for the remaining areas not included in the plan. MOTION by Commissioner Boone to amend Chairman Haire's motion to request the legislative bill, with the provisions stipulated, be subject to a referendum on the November ballot. (The ballot would include voting on joint jurisdiction -- not a vote on giving all the sovereignty away, but a vote on joint jurisdiction.) Commissioner Madison asked for a legal opinion on whether a joint jurisdiction was legal. Attorney Pope said the Board had the authority to enter into contracts with municipalities to perform certain services for the County and vice versa. Pope said he thought a joint planning board could be established, but he did not know about a joint jurisdiction. VOTING ON COMMISSIONER BOONE'S AMBNDNNNTt Ayes - 1 (Boone) (to place the proposal on November referendum) Nays - 4 VOTING ON ORIGINAL NOTIONi Ayes - 3 Nays - 2 (Madison, Stewart) (endorsement of plan subject to the a conditions) Commissioner Johnson spoke to the audience and cautioned them to remember that simply because the plan said there should be a service or a facility (schools/parks) in an area it did not necessarily mean that this would be accomplished. "Plans do not build things, money does," Johnson said. PUBLIC NNARINGB Chairman Haire adjourned the meeting to public hearing. 5 MAY " 419