HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_1218Road east of Mallard Way; more specifically identified as Lot 12,
Block B, of Iredell County Tax Map 2K. The property consists of
approximately 3.9 acres. Adjacent land was commercially zoned
prior to adoption of Land Development Plan in 1987. Recommending
approval would be inconsistent with the County's Land Development
Plan and Mooresville's Land Use Study. The property is more than
2600' to the nearest commercial node. Proposed usage of the land
is for a group of offices to be rented to doctors, dentists,
accountants, and lawyers, etc.
The request is coming from the Planning Board without a
and
seconded dtoirecomm recommend approval; however, it PlanningA motion from the iledrbywa 2 8 votee.)
Bill Neel, attorney, said he represented the owners. They have
a contract with a developer (Ernest Pruitt).
Ernest Pruitt, developer, passed out guidelines for the
proposed development. He mentioned the property was unique,
because it was separated by roads from the residential community.
The proposed use of the property is an up -scale residential office -
professional park.
Pruitt said he was a Brawley School area resident. He
reviewed the guidelines for the design and construction standards.
Pruitt said to alleviate the fears of the area residents, he
would like to drop the open residential office zoning request and
go to conditional use. Conditional use residential office. A
buffer strip would be guaranteed along the backside of the property
as stated in the zoning ordinances. An adjacent property owner has
smallasked for a and Pruitt said he would comply
this
request. Only five of h
the residential office uses would be used.
They are: medical/dental,pharmacies, business/prnd ofessional/public,
opticians/optical goods, p
institutions.
Walter Jones, attorney, said that Mr. Pruitt was offering an
opportunity and not a detriment. Jones said a town almost the size
of Mooresville was being built by Crescent Land & Timber. This
area must have support services.
John Campbell (Opponent) said he would like this request to be
denied. Felt the services mentioned were not needed.
Jack Prichloe (opponent) said he agreed with Mr. Campbell.
Didn't see any reason for the rezoning.
Bob Kunkleman (Proponent) stated he had property in the
immediate area and was building a new home. He is in favor of the
project.
Chairman Haire adjourned the public hearing.
Commissioner Johnson said he was a strong believer in personal
property rights; however, this case differs from the Thompson
request.
Commissioner Boone said he concurred with Mr. Johnson. The
property is surrounded on three sides by land zoned residential.
The Planning Board failed to approve this request on a vote of 2-8.
MOTION by Commissioner Johnson to deny the amendment to the
Land Development Plan pertaining to Case No. 9603-5.
VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0.
MOTION by Commissioner Boone to deny the rezoning request of
Case No. 9603-5.
APR 0,? 1996 389