Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_1192Mr. Jenkins, who never actually went to the podium, but spoke from the audience area, asked to eliminate the conditional restrictions. Commissioner Madison asked Mr. Boone if he would reconsider his amendments. Commissioner Boone said he would amend the amendment if Mr. Jenkins would comply with the current watershed restrictions. The amended MOTION will now be to rezone from Highway Business (CUD) to Highway Business (CUD) and the conditions will be: 1. No used units 2. Comply with current watershed restrictions 3. A six foot wooden fence along the back of the property VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0. Chairman Haire declared the meeting to be in public hearing. Rezoning Request; CFS Investments, Inc. Property Case No. 9602-2: Mr. Allison stated that CFS Investments was requesting that a portion of its property be rezoned from RA, Residential Agricultural to HB, Highway Business District. The property is located at the intersection of the Charlotte Hwy. and Shinnville Road; more specifically identified as 1Q -3-A-12 and a portion of 1Q -3-A-15. The property consists of approximately 4 acres. The Land Development Plan shows this property frontage on the Charlotte Hwy. as being future commercial. The property sits at an intersection of a State Road and busy highway. Staff recommends approval. On February 7, 1996, the Planning Board unanimously recommended approval. Mr. Jim Coates spoke and advised that he was one of the principals involved in the request. He mentioned the property was in a major intersection of a U.S. highway and N.C. highway. He requested the property be rezoned for future business use. Commissioner Stewart asked what was currently on the property, and was advised that the property was vacant. Chairman Haire declared the public hearing closed. MOTION by Commissioner Johnson to rezone the property from RA, Residential Agricultural to HE, Highway Business District. VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0. Chairman Haire declared the meeting to be in public hearing. PROPOSED AKENDMSNTO TO TRE IREDELL COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN REGARD TO THE NEN US 64 XWY.: Mr. Allison stated that in October of 1995, a Land Use Study was done in connection with the Hwy. 64 to prepare for upcoming commercial development. The study was done in order to recommend needed changes to the land development plan. Allison described the intersections involved in the study. All four quadrants of Woodbridge Rd. were identified for future commercial growth. The northeast and northwest quadrants of Hwy. 64 and Tarleton Road were identified for future commercial growth. The southwest quadrant of Lippard Farm Road was identified as future commercial growth. In reference to East Lackey Farm Road all four intersections (northeast, northwest, southeast and southwest) have areas identified as future commercial growth. At the intersection of Lackey Farm West, the Board identified the southwest quadrant and a portion of property in the northeast quadrant that adjoins Hwy 90 to be future coramercial. growth. Carolyn Houpe then spoke and asked about her property on East Lackey Farm Road. She asked for a clarification since she had 11 3W