HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_1173344
Rose mentioned that some Counties use one of their departments.
Rose advised that the requested action of the commissioners
was to indicate a belief in the planning concept and to give notice
to proceed.
It was the consensus of the commissioners that this item be
tabled until the March 5 meeting.
Rose indicated that any vehicles on order now might be delayed
in arrival if there was too such of a delay in submitting a plan.
DISCOSSION OF PROCEDURES INVOLVING MOBILE NONE UNDERPINNING G
OCCUPANCY: The director of the inspections department, Mr. Lynn
Niblock, recently surveyed adjoining c counties
to determine homesbtheir
o
procedures in allowing any occupancy
underpinning (under certain circumstances, e.g., inclement
weather). Some counties do not give temporary occupancy before
underpinning. Alexander County, however, allows an occupancy time
of 30 days. After this period of time power is disconnected. The
zoning department is responsible for the follow-up inspection.
Commissioner Johnson asked if 30 days was reasonable time in
getting the underpinning. Niblock responded yes, under most
circumstances.
It was the consensus of the Board to request that the
inspections director come back with a procedure to be used somewhat
similar to Alexander County. A combination of methods would be
acceptable. Any extension should be with justification. The
procedure should be as simple as possible, and the fee should be
commensurate with the extra work needed to make the inspection to
insure the underpinning was done.
RNQUEST POA APPROVAL OF JANUARY REPUNDS i RELEASES: Mr. Brent
ended
Weisner approval advisedatr the noted releases
were in Commissionerr,and he Boone had a�motor
vehicle bill on the list of releases.
Approved: ✓ 5� G_ �, 5� _
C erk to the Board
r"TCEENEME
3