HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_0356 (2)MOTION from Chairman Haire that the nominations be closed and
elect Mr. Boone by acclamation.
VOTING: Ayes - 4
Nays - 1 (Hamby)
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE AGENDA: Mr. Mashburn pointed out the
adjustments that needed to be made in the agenda, and the board
concurred with the changes recommended.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF LETTERS OF CREDIT: The two letters of
credit were presented by Mr. Jerry Lundy were as follows:
MONTERREY LANDING SUBDIVISION - $401,600.00
MOTION from Commissioner Madison to approve the letter of
credit as presented.
VOTING: Ayes - 5: Nays - 0.
DONALDSON LANDING SUBDIVISION - $189,346.50
MOTION from Commissioner Madison to approve the letter of
credit as presented.
VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0.
CONTINUATION OF DI8CU88ION OF OPTONETRIC EYE CARE CENTER -
PROP08AL8 PREBENTED: Mrs. Carolyn Harris, Personnel Director,
presented three proposals for eye care for county employees that
she has received. This service to the employees would not require
any county funds. The companies were offering discounts for the
county employee group for using their service. Mrs. Harris was
asking the board to give permission to the staff to pursue the best
proposal on behalf of the county employees and to approve the
recommendation of her proposal. She gave the following order of
choices:
1. Optometric Eye Care Center (first choice)
2. Allred Optical Company (second choice)
3. McKinnon Eye Clinic (third and least satisfactory
proposal)
Mr. Mashburn said he had discussed this service with some of
the other optometrists in the community and they thought a company
could offer this service to county employees without the
involvement of the board of commissioners. He said this might be
setting a precedent in the future for other services. He thought
further consideration is required.
MOTION from Commissioner Boone to postpone a decision on this
matter indefinitely.
VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0.
MODIFICATION TO RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD ORDINANCE: Mr.
Mashburn addressed this matter to the board. Some discrepancies
now occur in the way board members are elected to the recreation
advisory board and the way the current ordinance reads; therefore,
some changes should be considered for the existing ordinance.
The following are the recommended changes:
DEC X993
339