HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_0225 (2)AUG2 j`a _08
The definition of a minor or major variance the board
decided to ao with 30$. Major variances will be decided upon by
the State.
The board of adjustment is the board that will make decisions
on the minor and major adjustments. Appeal from the board of
adjustment will be to the state.
How to interpret "existing development." The definitions are
(1) valid building permit as of the effective date of the watershed
ordinance, (2) local governmental approval and a significant amount
of resources have been expended, (3) has an approved site specific
development plan. Staff or the board will have to decide what is
substantial development. This part will not be in the ordinance,
but the board of commissioners need to decide what would be
"substantial development." Lundy said he would lean toward case-
by-case determination because "substantial" can vary from project -
to -project, which could make a major difference. He sugaested
ii- ria be drawn and ogk at the iprojgctss nn a case-by-case basis
The board was in agreement with Mr Lundy's recommendation.
This concluded the discussion of the watershed ordinance
provisions.
Chairman Haire called for a ten-minute intermission prior to
the 7:00 p.m. public hearing.
CATAWBA RIVER BASIS GROUP: Commissioner Stewart inquired if
everyone on the board was in agreement with her attending the
Catawba River Basin Committee meeting. All board members were in
consensus that she should represent the board.
SIGNING UP TO SPEAR ON THE 7:00 P.N. PUBLIC BEARING: Mr.
Mashburn asked those in the audience who wished to speak at the
public hearing to please sign up if they have not done so by
calling into the clerk's office.
P IIB L I C N E A R ING
Chairman Haire announces that this is the date and hour fixed
by the Board of Commissioners for the public hearing upon the
orders entitled" ORDER AUTHORIZING $36,285,000 SCHOOL BONDS" AND
"ORDER AUTHORIZING $4,715,000 COMMUNITY COLLEGE BONDS."
No one appeared, either in person or by attorney, to be heard
on the questions of the validity of each of said orders or the
advisability of issuing said bonds and the Clerk to the Board of
Commissioners announced that no written statement relating to said
questions had been received,
except Donna Wike, residing at Iredell CoLnty, North Carolina,
who appeared in person and stated she was in favor of the bond
referendum on November 2, 1993;
except Tina Swaney, residing at Iredell county North
Carolina, who appeared in person and stated she was in favor of the
bond referendum on November 2, 1993;
except Dr. Jesse Register, residing at IYedell County North
Carolina, who appeared in person and stated he was in favor of the
bond referendum on November 2, 1993;
except R. B. Sloan, Jr., residing at Iredell County North
Carolina, who appeared in person and stated he was in favor of the
bond referendum on November 2, 1993;
except Jane Tarman, residing at Iredell County North
gAolina, who appeared in person and stated she was in favor of the