HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93009_0099 (2)MAY /'+ � ,, { 084
Traffic has been a question, and Mr. Tsumas feels that the
road will be a major corridor. He said the houses will be about
1800 square feet.
Mildred Martin - Spoke against the Plan for Early Vesting of
Development Rights in Oak Creek. She owns three acres of land.
She inquired about the traffic and the school in the area.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 67 (MOBILE ROME PARRS) OF THE
IREDELL COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE, RECOMMENDED BY THE IREDELL COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD: Mr. Lundy explained the Section 67 of the current
zoning ordinance. The board had asked staff to take a look at this
section with the idea of strengthening the ordinance. The changes
went to the planning board on March 3, 1993, and were in the county
commissioners, packets at the last meeting.
The planning board recommends the following amendments
67.45(c) of current ordinance requires a 40' set -back to the
exterior boundary of the right-of-way. The planning board
recommends increasing this to 501.
67.45(d) is recommended to be replaced with the following:
Streets with over seven mobile homes would have to be paved
and sets forth paving of the streets and also the base for that.
Section 67.45(f) to change 200 square feet to 500 square feet,
which deals with set-aside open space for recreational type
purposes.
Section 67.45(i) (1) would lower the maximum number of mobile
homes that can be placed in a park. Current ordinances says 50.
The planning board recommends reducing this to 40.
Section 67.45(i) (2) requires 1/2 mile separation between
mobile home parks. The planning board is not recommending this be
removed.
Commissioner Stewart asked Mr. Lundy to reiterate this 1/2
mile separation between parks.
Sharon Woods - Represents a group who are concerned about the
1/2 mile separation between the mobile home parks. They do not
want the 1/2 mile separation to be eliminated from the ordinance.
She submitted a petition containing 135 names against any change in
this particular item in the ordinance.
There was no one else to speak for or against any of the three
subjects scheduled for the public hearing.
Commissioner Stewart asked if Mr. Lundy would explain the
Section 67.45(1)(2). This portion of the ordinance will not be
changed from its present status of 1/2 mile separation between
mobile home parks.
Mr. Lundy said staff had recommended that this change be made;
however, the planning board was not recommending this change.
Chairman Haire closed the public hearing.
ERNEST RUNGE PROPERTY, CASE /9304 -is MOTION from Commissioner
Stewart to deny the request of Mr. Ernest Runge to rezone his
property to Highway Business based on the fact that it was denied
by the planning board.
VOTING: Ayes - 1 (Stewart)
Noes - 4 (Haire, Boone, Hamby, Madison)
MOTION from Commissioner Boone to send this matter back to the
planning board so they can consider the site plan. The property
discussed is approximately 11 1/2 acres located on Old Mountain