HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93011_1517 (2)LOCATION: The property is located at 1124 Charlotte Highway, being in the
southern quadrant of the interchange for 1-77 and Charlotte Highway in
Troutman, NC; more specifically identified as PIN# 4740-92-1175. Directions:
Take Charlotte Highway south from Troutman; property on right approximately
mile south of the existing truck stop.
REQUESTED ACTION.• Rezone subject parcel from RA, Residential Agricultural
to GB-CUD, General Business Conditional Use District.
• All utilities must be underground.
■ Apply Roadway Protection Overlay (RPO) standards; which include
signs, landscaping, and access restrictions.
• Interconnectivity between adjacent parcels.
PROPOSED USE: Any and all GB uses.
SIZE: 14.0 acres.
EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family Residential.
SURROUNDING LAND USE: Residential uses are adjacent to the northeast,
south, and east, with vacant commercial land to the north and west of the
requested property.
WATERSHED REGULATIONS: The subject parcel is not located within a
watershed area.
TRAFFIC: This section of Charlotte Highway had an average of 11,000 vehicles
per day in 2005. According to the 1993 Iredell County Thoroughfare Plan, this
section „,f Charlotte Highway has a carrying capacity of 10,500 vehicles per day.
ZONING HISTORY. The subject parcel was zoned RA when countywide zoning
took effect in 1990. Several rezoning cases have been approved at this
interchange in anticipation of commercial development occurring as the Town of
Troutman extends utilities into this area. Parcels adjacent to west and north of
the requested site have been rezoned as General Business Conditional Use, with
the most recent rezoning approved in March of 2007 for GB-CUD to allow for
possible future commercial development.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Exit 42 Small Area Plan identifies this area as
suitable for future interchange commercial development. The applicant has
chosen the GB-CU District classification, which allows for a greater range of
commercial uses and is similar to other nearby commercial properties. Adjacent
parcels to the north and west are zoned commercial and staff recommends in
favor of this request since it is consistent with the Exit 42 Small Area Plan.
PLANNING BOARD ACTION. On April 4, 2007 the Planning Board voted 8-0 to
recommend approval for the rezoning request.
No one else desired to speak, and Chairman Norman adjourned the hearing.
OTIO by Commissioner Tice, after reviewing the findings of fact and
determining them to be in order, to approve the proposed zoning map amendment and to
make a finding that approval was consistent with the adopted Exit 42 Small Area Plan
and that said approval was reasonable and in the public interest due to its consistency
with the Exit 42 Small Area Plan; as a result, said approval furthers the goals and
objectives of the Exit 42 Small Area Plan.
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
Case No. 0704-2: Bob Rudisill Homes, Inc., A Request to Rezone Property from
Residential Agricultural to Single Family Conditional Use District (R-12/CUD) Location: