HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93011_1443 (2)output, and to determine this, you need findings of fact. In order for an ordinance to stand up, you need
facts. Then limited duration, and this could be tied to the road (improvements). The most difficult part is
not making the cap arbitrary or capricious. It can't be an absolute cap. Some governments might assign
points. You would need to determine a value system."
Commissioner Johnson and Steve Warren said they understood the cap couldn't be tied to the
road. Johnson mentioned concerns about public safety, and this being used to justify the cap.
Attorney Pope asked the cap's duration, and he mentioned the possibility of placing another fire
station in the area. He also mentioned that he didn't have problems tying the cap to the road. Pope said
someone from EMS or a fire station needed to come and testify, and Department of Transportation data
would need to be supplied. Pope said other states had used a point system to eliminate the perception that
a cap was capricious or arbitrary.
OTIO by Commissioner Johnson for the planning staff, with assistance from Attorney Bill
Pope, and whomever the attorney desired to consult with, to determine the criteria to be used in limiting
building permits on the Brawley peninsula and for there to be a report of the findings at the March 20
board meeting.
VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0.
Chairman Norman said a land transfer fee was included in the list of recommendations. He asked
for more information on this option.
Planning Board Chairman Eric Fields said that as a part of the menu of options, there was a desire
to include methods for improvement and methods for implementation. He said a land transfer fee could be
tacked onto revenue stamps, and the Register of Deeds had confirmed this method. Fields said this option
would not require legislative approval.
The board then reviewed the menu of options for growth management as follows:
Nr
Prepare a Small Area Plan for the Perth Road area
Consider the application of special tax districts to produce additional revenue to
fund improvements for services
�(
Consider the inclusion of officials from NCDOT and both county school systems
early in the review process of new subdivisions by adding them to the Subdivision
Review Committee schools stems to participate only in an advisory capacity)
Evaluate an Adequate Public Facility Ordinance (APFO) targeting areas of critical
needs
Require developers to provide documentation for water availability and fire
suppression through the development review process
.(
Evaluate urban service areas and jurisdictional boundaries in terms of release of
jurisdiction procedures and policies; urban service and growth boundaries issues
between county and municipalities
Evaluate current subdivision ordinance for inclusion of new provisions:
N,
• Interconnectivity requirements
.%
• Turn lanes on roads where traffic improvements are needed
• Open space requirements
j
• Public water/sewer connection requirements
• Fire and emergency service standards and requirements
s J
• Time limitations on approved subdivisions
Consider a subdivision overlay district as a planning tool
�(
Consider requiring submittal of traffic impact analysis from public and
governmental developers for 100 lots or over
Consider overlay zoning districts to protect environmentally sensitive areas
.%
Consider roadway protection overlay district requirements for Perth Road;
evaluate Brawley School Road for changes to existing overlay district
�(
Evaluate implementation of building permit caps on Brawley School peninsula
and Perth Road, understanding the ramifications (May not withstand legal
challenge. Risky to apply to only select areas. Do not have a growth
managementplan.)
�I
Consider addition of new zoning classifications, for example, R-30 and R40
districts not countywide)
Prepare a countywide growth management plan
./
Review, update, and expand small area plans and countywide land use plan
Consider and evaluate land transfer fee with funds to be used for schools stems