HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93011_1038 (2)Commissioner Williams said he had concerns about the request due to the
planning board's denial. He said the planning board members had not reviewed the
four conditions that were later added.
Chairman Tice asked Mr. Warren the specific concerns of the planning board.
Warren said some members had questions, but there was no one at the meeting
that could answer them. He said the questions mostly dealt with mini -storage
businesses.
Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Warren about the WS -II Balance (Coddle
Creek) Watershed. He asked the restrictions on the impervious area. Mr. Johnson said
it didn't appear much damage could occur on 4.67 acres.
Warren said the commercial low density option (10/70 Rule) was 70% and this
was after 101/o of the site had been used. He said there was not an option on
commercial high density for this particular watershed. Warren acknowledged that
anyone re -developing the property would have to abide by the watershed rules.
Chairman Tice asked Warren how much of the 4.67 acres could be built upon.
Commissioner Johnson said a little over three and a quarter acres.
Commissioner Robertson said it appeared the future owners had a plan concept,
and the neighbors did not appear to be totally opposed. Robertson suggested that rather
than totally denying the request, which would require the applicant to wait another year
for reapplication, to send the matter back to the planning board for further review.
No one else desired to speak, and Chairman Tice adjourned the hearing.
OTIO by Commissioner Robertson to remand Case No. 0601-3 (Joe Keiper,
Applicant) to the planning board due to the new information being presented.
Commissioner Norman asked how soon the case could reappear before the
board of commissioners.
Warren said the planning board would reconsider the case in early March. He
said the case would probably be on the commissioners' agenda in April.
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
-'---- —CONSENT AGENDA---------------.-------_
Oby Commissioner Williams to approve the following 17 consent
agenda itemss..
VOTING: Ayes — 5; Nays — 0.
1. Request from the Iredell-Statesville School System for Acknowledgement of
Receipt and Review of the Public School Facility Needs Survey: At the 5:00
o'clock meeting, Iredell-Statesville Schools' Director of Construction Rob Jackson
requested review of a needs assessment survey the state required every five years from
each school unit. Jackson said the needs or numbers were entered into a computerized
survey, and a state formula rendered the costs.
2. Request from the Mooresville Graded School System for Acknowledgement
of Receipt and Review of the Public School Facility Needs Survey: Mooresville
Graded Schools Superintendent Dr. Bruce Boyles said the survey was a "benchmark" to
project what the statewide educational needs were for the state. He said the data could
be used for statewide bonds. Dr. Boyles said construction; however, was more
expensive in this area than in other parts of the state.