HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93011_0471 (2)I . The design of the subdivision does not create an obstacle to future extensions of
centralized water or wastewater systems.
2. Necessary easements for future water and/or wastewater facilities are dedicated at the
time of the subdivision.
3. The subdivision provides sufficient right-of-way for planned roadways identified in any
plan adopted by the City, County or State.
4. Provisions (necessary easements and agreement to connect at the property owner's
expense) are made for future connection to centralized wastewater systems for any lot
that is smaller than one acre in size.
5. Provisions (necessary easements and agreement to connect at the property owner's
expense) are made for the installation of centralized water lines that provide adequate
water supplies for normal use and adopted _fire flows."
Mr. Lauer then reviewed the proposed boundaries, and he said they were up to the county
planning director for interpretation. He said, "Ultimately, they can be changed, and we do
envision changing them with mutual agreement from the city and county. Changes that need to
be made on the proposed map are as follows:
A. City has annexed the Morrowcroft property north of the hospital and this should be
added.
B. The ETJ around the airport needs to be scaled back.
"Otherwise, the proposed map reflects the discussions of staff and council in past
meetings regarding the USA.
"The city and county may establish reasonable fees for the processing of development
applications, inspection of development, and capital facilities. Approval from the board of
commissioners shall be required prior to the establishment of any fee that will be applicable to
development in unincorporated areas.
"The agreement may be modified, at any time, subject to the review and comment by the
Joint Planning Committee along with approval by the board of county commissioners and the
city council.
"The dispute resolution section stipulates that the parties agree to enter into mediation
before going to court.
"The terms of the agreement are for ten years, unless extended.
"Finally, the agreement envisions the adoption by the county of a number of city
regulations: subdivision regulations to be adopted; building code has already been adopted; and
the standards for public improvements need to be adopted."
Mr. Lauer advised that a few comments had been received regarding the draft, and he
said one was on page 5; item B. Major Subdivisions #2. The last 2 lines should read: The City
may request review of the decision in accordance with Section 8.
Mr. Lauer said he had earlier mentioned that the appeals of staff actions were to be sent
to the board of commissioners. He asked if they should be sent to the BCA or not.
Chairman Steve Johnson clarified that this was the county's Zoning Board of
Adjustment.
County Manager Mashburn said Mr. Lauer needed to know if the commissioners wanted
to hear the appeals or if the Zoning Board of Adjustment should hear them.
Mr. Lauer explained it was his preference to have the appeals heard by the board of
commissioners so the members would be aware of any disputes that might be occurring in
relation to the agreement, especially in regards to any revisions that might be necessary.