HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93010_065516. Grocery Store
17, Hardware Store
18. Hobby & Toy Stores
19. Home Furnishings
20. Leather Goods Sales
21. Lighting Goods Sales
22. Miscellaneous Retail Sales
23. Music Stores
24. Newstands
25. Office Supply Stores
26, Optical Goods Sales
27. Paint, Glass and Wallpaper Stores
28. Pet Stores
29. Radio & Television Repairs
30. Record & Tape Stores
31. Retail Sales not classified elsewhere
32. Shopping Centers and Malls
33. Sporting Goods Stores
34. Tobacco Stores
35, Video Tape Rental & Sales
36, Woodworking Shops, Retail
Smith said the existing land use was vacant, and the surrounding land use was
vacant residential -office and commercial (highway and general business). He said the property
was rezoned in 1996 from Residential Agricultural to Residential Office. Mr. Smith said the
property was designated as "transitional" in the River Highway Corridor Study. He said
Neighborhood Business, with the stipulated conditions, would meet the study's designation.
Smith said the planning board on January 2, 2002, unanimously recommended approval.
Commissioner Ray asked about the location of the apartments.
Smith said "they more or less were positioned in a crescent around the property."
Commissioner Bowles asked about landscaping, if the request were granted.
Smith said the developer would be required to do a landscape buffer yardlie said
"standard throughout the ordinance was parking landscaping that included trees, as well as a
screen and buffer, between the apartments and the use."
No one else desired to speak, and Chairman Tice adjourned the public hearing.
MOTTO by Commissioner Johnson, after reviewing the findings of fact and
determining them to be in order, to grant the request of Case No. 0201-2 (Riverpark LL.C) and to
rezone the property from Residential Office to Neighborhood Business Conditional Use District
with the conditions stipulated by the planning supervisor and agreed upon by the applicant.
VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0.
Chairman Tice declared the meeting to be in a public hearing. All individuals desiring to
speak in reference to the case involving Crescent Resources' Vesting Rights for 711 lots were
invited to the dais to be swom in.
PROPOSED VESTING OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHT'S FOR THE POINTE—9—N
I NORMAN AND OTHER PROPERTY SOUTH OF BEECH TREF, ROAD OWNED BY
CRESCENTRFSOtiRCES. INC.: Crescent Resources, Inc., has requested an early vesting of
development rights (2-5 years) for a proposed residential subdivision located on several large tracts
between Beech Tree Road and Chuckwood Road off Brawley School Road, Mooresville, NC:
Smith said Crescent desired the early vesting of development rights (2-5 years for all phases) for
711 residential lots or 828 acres. He said the existing land use was vacant and the surrounding
land use was residential. Mr. Smith said that when the project was completed, possibly around
2010, the development could potentially add up to ten automobile trips per day, per household.
He estimated that 9,200 additional trips would occur. Mr. Smith said the Brawley School Road
presently handled over 19,700 vehicles a day. He said the request probably would not impact the
area that much because it would occur over an extended period of time and road improvements