HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_20791632
The project is proposed to cost $614,128 from the COBB and the county's share will be $150,000.
There is also a $20,000 contribution from the OCT, Greene said.
May 15th is the deadline to submit the application. A Citizens Advisory Board will need to be
established.
Those speaking on this subject were:
Willie Williams - Recommends the board continue with the project. Is from the area.
No one else spoke for or against the proposal.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REGARDING CASE #9201-2: This amendment is
connected with the William W. Skeen Property request.
No one spoke for or against the amendment.
WILLIAM N. SKEEN PROPERTY (CASE #9201-2) - REZONING REQUEST: Mr. Lundy identified this proper-
ty on the zoning map and stated the rezoning request is from RA to M-l(CUD). The planning board
recommended approval to M-i(CUD) and an amendment to the land development plan.
No one present spoke for or against the rezoning request.
R. R. MARLIN (CASE #9203-1): Mr. Lundy discussed this property. The rezoning request is from
HB to RA. Planning Board recommends the change.
No one present spoke for or against the rezoning.
0. T. KNIGHT ESTATE: Mr. Lundy said this request is from GB to RA. The property is
landlocked. Planning Board recommends the board approve this request.
No one present spoke for or against the rezoning.
DENNIS C. SUTTON AMENDMENT: Requests changing the 112 mile as measured by the shortest
straight line to .7 mile (as measured by public road connecting the closest portions of the lots
containing the two (2) mobile home parks).
Fred Sutton; Everyone is against the trailer park. The chairman asked those who are in
agreement with Mr. Sutton to stand. Approximately 25 persons stood.
Frank Woods. Not in favor.
park. Gary Hartsell for mother, Sara Hartsell. Opposed. Asked for a definition of mobile home
No one else spoke for or against the amendment.
JESSE J. BARNETT PROPERTY (CASE #9204-2): Mr. Lundy said the planning board recommends
rezoning this property from HB to RA.
Josephine Carter - Asked questions about the property. Wants to know what the property is to
be used for. She was in favor of the rezoning if she knew what she would be surrounded by.
Mr. Barnett responded that he was having the rezoning changed because of tax purposes. He has
no plans for development.
No one else spoke for or against the rezoning request.
DWIGHT AND ETHEL GOFORTH (Case #9204-3): This property is located on Highway 70 E and the
request is from RA to M-2. Planning Board recommends.
No one present spoke for or against the rezoning.
JACK E. SHAW PROPERTY (Case #9204-4): Request is for RA to R-8, Two Family Residential Dis-
trict. Planning Board recommends.
No one spoke for or against the rezoning.
Chairman Sloan closed the public hearing.
WILLIAM W. SKEEN - CASE 9201-2: MOTION from Commissioner Stewart to approve the recommendation
of the planning board and rezone the property from RA to M-1(CUD) Light Manufacturing Conditional
Use. The property is located on Triplett Road near Mazeppa Road, more specifically identified as
Lot 6, Block 8, of Iredell County Tax Map 4C and consists of approximately 45 acres. The property
is subject to the following conditions:
1. The proposed rezoning to M-1 CUD is for the purpose of promoting a comprehensively designed and
controlled development. In accordance with zoning ordinance requirements the development shall be
operated in a relatively clean and quite manner which will not be obnoxious to adjacent residential